\ Immigration and Labor The Economic Aspects of European Immigration to the United States By Isaac A. Hourwich, Ph.D. Second Edition Revised New York B. W. HUEBSCH, 1922 COPYRIGHT, 1912 BY G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS COPYRIGHT. 1923 BY ISAAC A. HOURWICH, PH.D. Printed by Harper & Brother* New York PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION IMMIGRATION is treated in this book solely as an eco- 1 nomic question. In this the author followed the Immi- gration Commission, which was created by Congress in 1907, and presented its report in 1910. He was not unaware of the existence of a sentiment against immigration, based upon other than economic considerations. Indeed, most of the first chapter, and a part of the third, are devoted to this aspect of the question. But he concurs in the opinion of the experts of the Immigration Commission, and of the Com- mission on Industrial Relations, that the objections to im- migration are fundamentally of an economic nature^ Prior to the war, the only real power behind the agitation in favor of restriction of immigration was organized labor. Our statesmen in Washington took scant notice of the academic disquisitions in the domains of anthropology, ethnology, sociology, eugenics, and political science, which presented the old arguments of the Know-Nothings dressed up in a modern scientific garb. But they listened to union officials who proposed to reward their friends and punish their enemies on election "day. Yet the opposition of labor to immigration was outweighed by the influence of capital, which regarded free trade in the labor market as indispensable for the expansion of American industry. The social revolu- tion in Russia and its echoes in Hungary, Germany, and Italy, as well as the growth of the Socialist and Communist parties in all European countries, have aroused a fear of immigration among American capitalists. Labor and capital now united in the demand for restrictive legislation. Or- ganized labor favofta "complete exclusion of immigration, capital favored a "selective \\test meant to bar all immi- iii /V tPr-efctce to the Second Edition '" Bolshevism," which is a comprehensive term for every variety of economic and political heresy. A compromise was reached by the passage of the recent immi- gration act, supplemented by the order of the State De- partment requiring the visaing of the passports of all in- tending immigrants by American consuls in the countries of emigration. Both are merely emergency measures, and the matter will again be before Congress at its regular session. The object of this edition is to aid in the public discussion of this question. The first edition of this book appeared less than two years before the World War. No changes in the structure of society manifest themselves within two years under ordinary conditions. No new immigration legislation was enacted during that time. It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that the normal effects of immigration on the eve of the war were the same as at the time when this book was first pub- lished. The outbreak of the European war produced a revolutionary change. As an ardent advocate of restriction exultingly put it, "the war did to immigration what all the restrictionist agitation in the world could not have accom- plished it stopped it altogether." 1 Here was an opportunity to test the effects of the cessation of immigration upon the condition of labor in the United States. This subject is treated in the new chapter, "The Lessons of the War," dealing with labor conditions during the late war. The forecast of the probable effects of restriction of immigration, which was the concluding chapter of the first edition, has been retained, with the omission of the discussion of some of the recommendations of the Immigration Commission which are now out of date. The reader is thus enabled to verify the deductions drawn from the history of immigration prior to the war, by the experience of labor during a period without immigration. The new chapter may serve as an answer to the main criticisms of the first edition. A reviewer in The Quarterly Journal of Economics scouted 1 Prof. Henry P. Fairchild in The New York Times of October 12, 1919. Preface to the Second Edition v the "elaborate treatment . . . accorded the question 'has emigration from Southern and Eastern Europe checked emi gration from Northern and Western Europe?'" It seemed to him that "restrictionists ... who plan and expect a re- vival of the older immigration, are not conspicuous." Yet this is the avowed aim of the 3 per cent quota of the immi- gration law which was enacted last spring. A detailed analysis of the points raised by critics will be found in the Appendix. ISAAC A. HOURWICH. NEW YORK, September 15, 1921. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION THE Immigration Commission, after three years of investigation, reached the conclusion that our immi- gration policy "should be based primarily upon economic or business considerations." ' This conclusion has determined the scope of the present book: it treats immigration solely as an economic question. For the same reason the dis- cussion is confined to European immigration, Oriental immigration being viewed by many students primarily as a race question, which reaches out beyond the domain of economics. The author gratefully acknowledges his indebtedness to Mr. William W. Bishop, superintendent of the Reading Room, Library of Congress, who obligingly placed at his disposal the exceptional facilities of the Library; to Mr. W. W. Husband, secretary of the Immigration Commission, who courteously gave him access to the proof sheets of the reports of the Commission, in advance of their publication; and to the young men and women who assisted him in the preparation of the material for this book. I. A. rl. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 23, 1912- CONTENTS PART I. SUMMARY REVIEW. PACK Difference between the old and the new immigration quantitative, not qualitative. ..... ! Immigration and emigration regulated by demand for labor . . 3 The myth of imported immigrants 2 Unemployment the result of industrial maladjustment . . 4 Unemployment varies inversely with immigration . . . 5 Limited demand for immigrant labor in agriculture ... 7 Effect of immigration not racial displacement, but evolution of an English-speaking aristocracy of labor .... 9 Causes of the decrease of emigration from Northern and Western Europe 13 Race suicide unrelated to immigration . . . . .18 Economic reason for the predominance of unskilled laborers among the immigrants i The standard of living of the recent immigrant not inferior to that of his predecessors 19 Higher standard of living of the American workman maintained with the aid of his children's wages 22 Native workmen and older immigrants not underbid by recent immigrants 23 Employment of immigrants in large numbers going together with advances in wages 24^, Reduction of child labor in States with a large immigrant popu- lation. Child labor a substitute for immigration . . 26 Reduction of the workday 27 Work accidents not the result of immigration .... 29 Immigration and trade-unionism. Union membership rising and falling with the rise and fall of immigration . 30 Organization among the unskilled 3 2 Regulation of terms of employment by conferences between organ- ized capital and organized labor . 33 vi i J viii Contents PAGE Immigration not the cause of the labor problem . . -34 Restriction of immigration no relief for unemployment . . 35 The lesson of the late war; decline of real wages amidst industrial prosperity, in the absence of immigration . 36 PART II. TOPICAL ANALYSIS. CHAPTER I. STATEMENT OF THE QUESTION. Objections to immigration 40 Old and new immigration 41 What is "undesirable" immigration 41 The problem of assimilation 42 Restriction of competition demanded by organized labor . . 44 Cosmopolitanism and the theory of "seclusion and isolation" . 45 CHAPTER II. THE REPORT OF THE IMMIGRATION COMMISSION. Conclusions of the Commission: Immigration an economic problem 48' Defects of the Report: Absence of a historical view 50 Lack of statistical evidence to support its conclusions . 51 Race distinction the dominant idea of the investigation . 55 Deceptive statistical generalizations . . i . . .58 CHAPTER III. k OLD AND NEW IMMIGRATION. The immigrant of bygone days as popularly pictured . 61 The bulk of immigrants a century ago indentured servants . 62 Destitution of the free immigrants before the era of the "new immigration" 63 Congestion in the settlements of past generations of immi- grants in New York City . .- . . .65 Aversion of the early Irish immigrants to employment in farming 67 Contents IX PACK Majority of the old immigration unskilled laborers ... 67 Percentage of skilled mechanics about the same for the last half century 69 No evidence of a lowered standard of immigration ... 69 The average immigrant intellectually above the average of his countrymen at home 70 Social prejudice against immigrants in the past 73 The "bird of passage" .74 The problem of assimilation . 75 Opposition of organized labor antedates the "new immigration" 78 Note: The Statistics of Italian Illiteracy.^, 80 CHAPTER/IV^ 1r f IMMIGRATION AND THE LABOR MARKET. Demand for labor increasing faster than population ... 82 Immigration follows business conditions 86 How the volume of immigration is regulated .... 93 Importation of contract laborers infrequent .... 99 Character of immigration determined by demand for labor . 101 CHAPTER V. THE DEMAND FOR LABOR IN AGRICULTURE. Relative and absolute decrease of the rural population . .103 Migration of Americans of native stock to the city . . .104 Comparative demand for labor in agriculture and industry . 104 Differentiation of manufacturing from farming . . .106 Centralization of industry and its effect upon farming . .107 Introduction of labor-saving machinery 108 Displacement of the wage-earner IO 9 Low wages . . . . no Long hours IIQ Limits to further growth of agricultural population . . .112 CHAPTER VI. UNEMPLOYMENT. A. The Causes of Unemployment. Unemployment not the result of over-population . . "4 Differentiation of manufacturing from farming leads to un- employment . . 1*4 x Contents PAGE Seasonal trade variations 115 Lack of mobility of skilled labor 117 Cyclical fluctuations of employment 121 Dissipation of the demand for labor 121 The labor reserve 124 B. Unemployment and Immigration. Native and foreign-born workmen equally affected by un- employment 125 Unemployment is in inverse ratio to the relative number of foreign-born 128 Annual variations of the relative number unemployed . 137 Annual variations of the number of working days . .140 Immigration not a contributory cause of unemployment . 145 A remedy against unemployment 146 CHAPTER VII. RACIAL STRATIFICATION. Migratory character of the population of the United States . 148 Industrial growth of the country west of the Atlantic Seaboard States 150 Adjustment of native and foreign elements on the scale of occupations 150 Actual displacement of American wage-earners by immigrants a rare exception ........ 151 Extraordinary expansion of the iron and steel industry. Native Americans employed in increased numbers since immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe has become conspicuous. 158 Economic opportunity for the advancement of English-speaking wage-earners created by immigration . . . .161 "Racial displacement" a negligible quantity . ' . . .165 CHAPTER VIII. EMIGRATION FROM NORTHERN AND WESTERN EUROPE. A. Introductory: Emigration from Northern and Western Europe cannot keep pace with the demand for immigrant labor in the United States ... .177 B. Germany. Excess of immigration to, over emigration from Germany . 180 Sources of immigration to Germany: Southern and Eastern Europe 181 Contents xi PAGE Industrial expansion j8 2 Increased demand for labor . . . . .185 Improvement of the condition of labor . . . .185 Progress of labor legislation . . . . . .188 Agricultural progress. Advance in the wages of farm labor. 189 Co-operation ......... 191 Effects of the repeal, in 1890, of the exceptional laws of 1878 191 Immigration of German unskilled laborers to the United States has increased with the increasing tide of immi- gration from Southern and Eastern Europe . . . 192 C. The Scandinavians. Immigration of Scandinavian breadwinners to the United States highest in 1901-1910 196 Scandinavians seeking employment in competition with im- migrants from Southern and Eastern Europe . . 198 D. Norway. Total number of Norwegian immigrants highest in 1901-1910 202 Recent industrial development of Norway . . . 202 E. Denmark. Conditions of the Danish peasants greatly improved since theSo's. Success of agricultural co-operation . . 203 Polish migration to Denmark 204 Progress of the manufacturing industry. Strong organization oflabor 204 P. Sweden. Cause of the decline of emigration from rural districts: Small demand for farm help in the United States . . 205 Immigration to Sweden 206 Recent industrial development 207 Progress of organized labor 208 G. The United Kingdom. Development of the British colonies drawing immigrants from the mother country 209 Effect of colonial restriction of foreign immigration . 210 Encouragement of immigration of British subjects by the Canadian and the Australian Governments . .210 Emigration from the British Isles to the United States in 1880-1909 not below normal. Rising tide in 1898-1907 . 211 Improvement of living conditions in Great Britain . . 2i4 xii Contents FAGB H. Ireland. Emigration from Ireland decreasing since 1860 . . .215 Effects of land reform 217 Welfare work of the country governments . . . .218 The co-operative movement . . . . . .218 Rise in wages of farm laborers 218 Improvement of the condition of the people . . .219 /. Conclusion: Immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe could not be replaced by immigration from Northern and Western Europe 220 CHAPTER IX. RACE SUICIDE. General Walker's explanation of the decline in the native birth- rate: Native stock replaced by immigration . . .221 Decline of the birth-rate begins in 1810-1830 .... 223 A world-wide phenomenon 224 Race suicide universal among social classes not affected by im- migrant competition 224 CHAPTER X. THE STANDARD OF LIVING. A. Introductory: The subject of inquiry comparative stand- ards of unskilled laborers, past and present . . . 228 B. Congestion in New York City. Overcrowding and filth in the first half of the past century . 229 Squalid rooms of native American sewing women . .231 The shanty dwellers in the middle of the nineteenth century 231 The Irish and German colonies in the 60 's . . . 232 Improved conditions of the Jewish and Italian districts of our day 234 Industrial causes of congestion 235 Effect of congestion upon cost of living and wages . . 240 C. Housing Conditions in the Country at Large. Housing conditions of New England working girls in the 40*3 . 241 Filthy and unsanitary tenements in Boston in the days of the old immigration . . . . . . .241 The same conditions in smaller towns .... 243 Shanty dwellers in Massachusetts 244 Contents xiii PACK Comparison with housing conditions in Ireland . . 245 Housing conditions of native white unskilled laborers in Southern mill towns ...... 246 Cause of bad housing conditions economic, not racial . . 247 Responsibility of the landlords . . . . . 247 Company houses 248 Tendency of the Immigration Commission to shift the blame to the tenant ........ 249 Fallacy of the race classification adopted by the Commission . 250 Rental paid by immigrants as high as, or higher than, that paid by native wage-earners . . . . . 250 Native American wage-earners in small towns with low rents able to underbid the immigrant workers of large cities with high rents 255 D. Food: Existence of a race standard of living not proved . 256 E. Clothing. Prices paid by recent immigrants the same as those paid by native Americans ....... 265 Race variations insignificant 266 F. Savings. Small margin of income left for savings . . . .. 267 American wage-earners not injured by the investments of immigrants in their home countries .... 269 The Mercantilist objection to the exportation of money . 271 CHAPTER XL HOME OWNERSHIP. Point of view of the Immigration Commission not that of the wage-earner 2 74 Irregularity of employment a bar to home ownership . . 274 Handicap in labor disputes . 2 7 6 Tenancy in Boston in 1790, 1845, 1890, and 1900 . .^ . 276 Native home owners before the period of the "new immi- gration" Home ownership decreasing with the increase of land values . 278 Immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe not long enough in the United States to have acquired homes Tenancy increasing with the growth of urban population . . 282 xiv Contents CHAPTER XII. EFFECT OF IMMIGRATION ON WAGES. PAGE Difference in wages due to grade of service, not to country of birth 284 Native American and Americanized families maintain a higher standard with the aid of children's earnings . . . 285 Recently -landed immigrants not engaged at less than the prevail- ing rates of wages 285 Machinery and immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. 28$ Defects of wage statistics . . . . . . 292 Wages in urban and rural manufactures: Country competition of native Americans tends to lower the wages of immigrants 297 Rates of wages not affected by immigration .... 299 Increase of wages result of industrial expansion . . . 302 Wages of railroad employees 302 Low salaries of clerical help 304 Wages in coal mines and steel mills 305 What would have been the increase of wages without immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe? .... 306 Wages of older employees kept up by immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe . 309 x CHAPTER XIII. HOURS OF LABOR. Hours of labor of native American mill hands in the ante-immi- gration period 311 Reduction of hours contemporaneous with immigration . . 313 Foreign unskilled laborers in the steel industry working shorter hours than English-speaking skilled and semi-skilled em- ployees 314 Reduction of the working day in the cotton mills . . .315 Comparative reduction of hours in New York City and in the remainder of New York State, 1901-1910 .... 315 CHAPTER XIV. * CHILD LABOR. Child labor in the early days of the factory system . . . 318 Decrease in the employment of children contemporaneous with in- crease of immigration 318 Contents xv PAGE Employment of children in the South relatively greater than in States with a large immigrant population . . . .319 Child labor in rural Missouri 322 CHAPTER XV. f LABOR ORGANIZATIONS. Conclusions of the Immigration Commission contradicted by its statistics: Trade union affiliation of Jewish and Italian cloth- ing workers in New York City above the average for the wage-earners of the country at large 325 Membership in labor unions unaffected by race . . . 326 Organization among immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe as strong as among natives and immigrants from Northern and Western Europe 327 Labor unions previous to 1880 ephemeral .... 329 Greatest progress coincides with the great tide of immigration of the last decade 330 Union membership in New York State rising and falling with rise and fall of immigration 335 Trade-unionism stronger in New York than in Kansas with its decreasing foreign-born population 337 Trade unions stronger in New York City than in the remainder of the State . . .341 Strikes increasing with immigration 343 Trade unions mostly confined to skilled crafts. Unskilled laborers not eligible for membership in craft unions . . . 34 6 Discrimination against immigrants . . . . . . 347 Conflicting interests of the skilled and the unskilled . . -347 Example of the Lawrence strike 34^ Possibilities of organization among the unskilled . . . 349 Home training of immigrants in organization . r . . . 349 Effect of machinery upon craft unions 35 1 Trusts against unions 35 2 CHAPTER XVI. PAUPERISM AND CRIME. A. Introductory: The period of the greatest immigration at- tended by a decrease of pauperism and crime . . 353 B. Pauperism. Pauperism less frequent among the new immigration than among the old. . 354 xvi Contents Difference not due to "racial displacement. " Pauperism the result of industrial invalidism C. Crime. Supposed criminal proclivities of the foreigner: Popular prejudice unfounded ... Increase of immigration coincident with decrease of crime. PART III. IMMIGRANTS IN THE LEADING INDUSTRIES. CHAPTER XVII. THE GARMENT WORKERS. Origin of the sweating system antedates immigration Real wages of sewing women of past generations lower than to-day. Long hours in the past Competition of farm-house labor in the middle of the nineteenth century . .... Expansion of the clothing industry the result of immigration Introduction of the factory system followed by increase of wages. Rates of wages not influenced by racial factors Earnings of recent immigrant women higher than those of native Americans . . American garment workers in the country accepting a lower rate of wages than Jewish city workers .... Organization among clothing workers more effective than among other industrial workers in the United States CHAPTER XVIII. THE COTTON MILLS. Wages in 1875-1908: intermittent advances and reductions prior to the "new immigration"; upward movement since. Effect of immigration on organization of labor .... No competition between union labor and unorganized immigrants. In labor contests immigrants have supported the unions. Competition of the Southern mills: Cheap white labor of the South keeping down the wages of immigrants in the North. CHAPTER XIX. THE WOOLEN MILLS. The Lawrence strike and public opinion . . . Contents xvii MM! Native Americans left the woolen mills before 1880, not forced out by recent immigrants. . . . . ,g s Americans of native stock coming back to the mills since the arrival of the new immigrants 386 Recent expansion of the woolen industry 387 Wages stationary prior to the new immigration, increasing since. Wages of unskilled laborers increased at a higher rate than those of skilled operatives . . . . . . 388 Tales of induced immigration unconfirmed .... 390 Strike record of English-speaking operatives exceeded by recent immigrants .' ^ . . 392 CHAPTER XX. THE IRON AND STEEL WORKERS. The "princes of labor" and the "white coolies." . . . 394 No "crowding out " of English-speaking workmen by immigrants . 395 Highly paid men a small fraction of the force in the past, as in the present . . . . . . . . 395 Wages of unskilled laborers rising . . . . . 397 Technical revolution in the iron and steel industry . . . 398 Retention of skilled men conditioned upon the employment of in- creasing numbers of unskilled laborers .... 400 New immigrants not working for less pay than natives or older immigrants 401 Wages in the iron and steel industry vary directly as the ratio of recent immigrants . .401 Sunday work and long hours the general rule long before the period of the "new immigration." Demand of employers for an eight-hour day in the 8o's resisted by organized skilled iron v and steel workers. Piece-workers firm for a twelve-hour day . 409 The Amalgamated Association a union of skilled workers only. Common laborers barred from membership . . . 411 Decline of the organization due to substitution of machinery for skill \ 4 Attempt of recent immigrants to organize along industrial lines. 413 CHAPTER XXI. THE COAL MINERS. The "racial displacement" theory of the Immigration Com- mission ....... 4*4 Opening of new mining fields the real cause of the westward move- ment of coal miners. . ... 4*6 xviii Contents PAGE Advancement of experienced miners 421 Other avenues opened by the general expansion of industry . 422 Caste prejudice against the immigrant the outgrowth of occupa- tional stratification 424 Displacement of the pick-miner by the mining machine: employ- ment of unskilled immigrants the effect, not the cause, of the introduction of mining machines 425 Fluctuations in the demand for coal 432 Part-time employment in lieu of unemployment . . . 434 The migratory worker the product, not the cause, of irregularity of employment 435 Average number of days per man has increased with recent immi- gration 436 Rise in wages 438 The company house and the company store as old as the coal- mining industry . 443 History of the miners' unions in the bituminous coal fields. . 445 Biennial conferences between the mine operators and the United Mine Workers in the bituminous coal fields . . . 447 Competition of unorganized Americans of native stock . . 447 Southern and Eastern European immigrants affiliated with miners' organizations since the early 8o's; have joined in every strike . 449 Violence in strikes not a special characteristic of the recent immi- grants .......... 450 Failure of the organization in West Virginia and the Southern fields not due to immigration 451 The language question solved in practice 452 Recognition of the union by the Steel Trust .... 453 Miners' unions in the anthracite fields short-lived prior to 1897. 454 Capacity of Slavs for compact organization .... 455 The strike of 1902: significance of the award of the Anthracite Coal Strike Commission 456 CHAPTER XXII. f WORK ACCIDENTS. Work accidents attributed to recent immigration. An adaptation of the common-law theory of liability for accidents . . 458 Competition among coal operators the primary cause of waste of life in coal mines 462 Majority of accidents preventable by mining legislation and efficient inspection of coal mines ^ 468 Misleading comparisons between English-speaking and non- English-speaking employees 471 Contents XIX Decrease of the accident rate in anthracite coal mines . 473 Increase of the fatal accident rate in bituminous mines explained by their gradual exhaustion .... 4 g o "Negligence" of the miners, psychological effect of mine accidents 48o Speeding the cause of "carelessness" in the steel mills . . 481 "Assumption of risk" by the new immigrants .... 482 Accident rates in coal mines and on railroads compared . . 483 Statistics of strikes against dangerous working conditions in the United States . . 485 PART IV. CONCLUSION. CHAPTER XXIII. PROBABLE EFFECTS OF RESTRICTION A FORECAST. Plan to improve the condition of labor by checking the develop- ment of industry 487 Unemployment can not be reduced by restriction of immigration. 488 Scarcity of labor not necessarily followed by scarcity wages: agricultural labor as an illustration 489 Labor-saving machinery as a substitute for immigration . . 490 Farmers and agricultural laborers as a labor reserve . . . 490 Extension of child labor as a possibility 490 Further depopulation of rural districts must increase the cost of living .......... 491 Emigration and capital 491 Effects of a slow expansion of industry 492 CHAPTER XXIV. THE LESSONS OF THE WAR. Decline of immigration 493 "Salutary effects" predicted by the Commission on Industrial Relations 493 Growth of manufactures, mining, and transportation . . 494 Enormous profits 495 Shortage of labor .... ..498 Importation of Mexican peons permitted by the Department of Labor . . . . 499 xx Contents Mobility of labor 499 Scholastic theory of wages 500 Decline of the purchasing power of wages .... 500 Increase of the proportion of malnourished children . . . 504 Increase in the number of strikes ...... 505 Collective bargaining, encouraged by the government . . 505 Foreign-born workers not responsible for decline in real wages . 506 Movement of labor from the farms to the factories . . . 506 Agricultural production stationary, exports and prices of farm products increasing ....... 506 Migration of Negroes from the South to the North, as a substitute for immigration . . . . . . . . 507 Increased employment of women and children .... 508 American capital seeking investment in Europe . . .510 Monopolistic price control 510 Restriction of immigration no remedy 511 APPENDIX In answer to critics . . , 515 Note. Importation of Mexican contract-laborers . . . 530 Statistical Tables . .. . . . . . . . 531 Alphabetical Index 561 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Per cent who speak English, by years, in the United States. 58 2. Per cent distribution of immigrants by occupations: 1861- 1910 67 3. Ratio of laborers to immigrant breadwinners ... 68 4. Per cent of illiteracy among the population of Russia, Bul- garia, Servia, and Greece, and among the immigrants from the same countries 71 5. Visits abroad made by foreign-born employees in iron and steel mills, by races 75 6. Per cent of Polish and German employees of packing houses in Kansas City, and their foreign-born children six years of age or over, who speak English, by years in the United States . .78 7. Immigration from Europe compared with increase of popu- lation born in Europe . . . . . .88 8. Movement of third-class passengers between the United States and European ports, 1899 to 1909 . . 90 9. Average monthly immigration and emigration, 1907-1909 . 92 10. Immigrants' connections in the United States ... 94 n. Assisted immigration ....... 96 12. Population and immigration 101 13. Decrease of the population of rural territory, 1900-1910 . 104 14. Average annual earnings of farm laborers in Kansas, com- pared with earnings in similar non-agricultural occupa- tions in the same state, 1900 m- 15. Distribution of white male laborers, employed in agriculture and other pursuits in California, by rates of wages per week (without board), 1906 . . . . . in 1 6. Range of fluctuations of employment, 1899 and 1904 . . 123 17. Per cent distribution of native and foreign-born male iron and steel workers sixteen years of age and over, by num- ber of months of employment . . . 127 1 8. Comparative percentages of unemployed and of foreign-born breadwinners, by geographical divisions, 1900 . .128 19. Greatest and least number of male wage-earners employed in manufactures during any one month of the year 1899, greatest number of unemployed, and percentage of foreign-born males engaged in manufactures and me- chanical pursuits in 1900, by groups of states . .13 xxii Contents TABLE PAGB 20. Greatest and least number of female wage-earners employed in manufactures during any one month of the year 1899, greatest number of unemployed, and percentage of foreign-born females engaged in manufactures and me- chanical pursuits, in 1900, by groups of states . .131 21. Laborers (male), foreign-born, and unemployed, 1900 . 136 22. Cotton-mill operatives (male), foreign-born, and unem- ployed, 1900 136 23. Ratio of unemployment in Massachusetts, 1888-1908 . 138 24. Average number of days worked in bituminous coal mines of Pennsylvania, average production per employee per day worked, and number of immigrant miners and laborers destined for Pennsylvania, 1901-1909 . . 140 25. Average number of wage-earners employed in manufactures, 1879-1909 . .... 151 26. Per cent distribution of male breadwinners twenty-one years of age and over, by nativity and class of occupations, 1 900 151 27. Occupations in which the number of native-born decreased, 1890-1900 152 28. Decrease from all causes, compared with loss by death among native white males of native parentage, in selected oc- cupations, 1890-1900 153 29. Increase of the number of laborers in the United States, clas- sified by race and nativity, 1890-1900 . . .156 30. Increase of the number of miners in the United States, clas- sified by nativity, 1890-1900 . . . . .157 31. Decrease of the number of native white miners, 1890-1900 . 158 32. Number of iron and steel workers in the United States, by race and nativity, 1880, 1890, and 1900 . . .159 33. Increase of the number of iron and steel workers in the prin- cipal cities of the Middle West, by race and nativity, 1890-1900 160 34. Number and per cent of skilled and unskilled laborers in one iron and steel concern, 1907 . . . . .162 35. Number of English, Welsh, Irish, and German male bread- winners, 1890 and 1900 ...... 166 36. Shifiing of English and Welsh male breadwinners in selected occupations, 1890-1900 168 37. Shifting of Irish male breadwinners in selected occupations, 1890-1900 169 38. Shifting of German male breadwinners in selected occupa- tions, 1890-1900 . . . . . . .170 39. Principal nationalities of male breadwinners classified by occupation groups (per cent), 1900 . . . .171 Contents xxiii TABLE pA 40. Per cent distribution of foreign-born male breadwinners ac- cording to nationality and grade of occupation, 1900 . 172 41. Increase and decrease of the number of breadwinners in Massachusetts classified by sex, nativity, and occupa- tion groups, 1900-1905 I74 42. Specified occupations in Massachusetts with a decreasing number of native breadwinners, classified by sex and nativity, 1900-1905 I75 43. Foreign-born population of Germany, net emigration and net immigration !g o 44. Migration of workers from Russian Poland to Germany for temporary employment, 1890-1904 . . . .181 45. Comparative growth of railroad mileage and freight traffic in Germany and the United States, 1890-1900 . .183 46. Per cent increase of the population of Germany and of the number of breadwinners in trade and manufactures, 1882-1907^ 185 47. Average annual^earnings in Prussian coal mines, 1890-1910 . 186 48. Membership of trade-unions in Germany, 1890-1900 . .187 49. Progress of organization among female wage-earners, in Ger- many, 1895-1910 188 50. Comparative summary of the principal expenses of the national organizations affiliated with the "General Com- mission of the Trade-Unions of Germany," 1895-1910 . 189 51. Agricultural progress in Germany, 1895-1909 . . .190 52. Co-operative associations in Germany, 1903-1908 . . 191 53. Annual average immigration from Germany, 1875-1910 . 192 54. Emigration from Germany to all countries outside the United States, 1890-1904 194 55. Scandinavian immigration to the United States, 1881-1910 . 196 56. Increase of foreign born from the Scandinavian countries and from Eastern and Southern Europe, 1880-1910, by geo- graphic divisions .... . 199 57. Distribution of Scandinavian immigrant breadwinners by main classes of occupations, 1881-1910 . . . 201 58. Immigration from Norway to the United States . . 202 59. Immigration from Denmark to the United States, 1820-1910 203 60. Annual average emigration from Sweden by destination, 1861-1908 .205 61. Average annual emigration from cities and rural districts of Sweden, 1881-1907 206 62. Annual average emigration from Sweden to other European countries, and immigration to Sweden from other Euro- pean countries, 1881-1908 ..... 207 xxiv Contents TABLE PAGE 63. Per cent of wage-earners employed under the system of col- lective bargaining in the principal industries of Sweden ........ 209 64. Number of emigrants from the United Kingdom by destina- tion, 1840-1909 212 65. Net emigration of British subjects from the United Kingdom by countries of destination, 1895-1909 . . .210 66. Average real wages in Great Britain, 1850-1900 . . .215 67. Annual average emigration from Ireland, May I, 1851, to March 31, 1908 ....... 216 68. Annual average emigration from Ireland by destination, 1876-1908 . . 217 69. Families occupying each class of inhabited houses in rural areas of Ireland, 1861-1901 ..... 219 70. Per cent ratio of native white children under five years of age, born of native mothers, to native white females, fifteen to forty-four years of age, in cities of less than 25,000 inhabitants and rural territory, and per cent ratio of native white male farmers, planters, and overseers, to the total number of white male breadwinners, 1900, by areas comprising states and territories grouped ac- cording to ratio of children, 1900 .... 225 71. Per cent distribution of the families of Boston according to number of families per house, 1855 and 1900 . . 242 72. Number of tenements of one room occupied by three or more persons, 1901 ........ 245 73. Per cent of families keeping boarders or lodgers among the races of the old immigration 252 74. Per cent of foreign-born families in which wife has employ- ment or keeps boarders or lodgers, by yearly earnings of husband . . . . . . . . 253 75. Average annual rent per family and per individual in normal families, by nativity, in Northern states . . . 254 76. Annual rent per family and per individual in normal families, by nativity of head of family ..... 255 77. Average expenditure per man per day of selected families or South Italian and native white workers in the iron and steel district of the South . . . .258 78. Average food expenditures per man per day, by income and nationality 260-261 79. Expenditures for food in normal families with an income from $400 to $700, classified by nativity and income . 262 80. Expenditure for clothing in normal families of unskilled laborers, classified by income and nativity . . 267 Contents xxv TABLE p ACB 81. Surplus of income over expenditure of normal families, clas- sified by country of birth 268 82. Per cent of home-owners in the population of Boston, 1845- 1900 . 377 83. Percentage of native white home-owners to all occupants, classified by parent nativity, in cities with a population of 50,000 and over . 278 84. Percentages of home-owners classified by value of homes, 1 890 278 85. Home ownership and value of real estate in areas, with ratio of home-owners to total families above and below the average, 1890 . . .' 279 86. Number of houses and apartments advertised for rent to white tenants in Washington, D. C., on the last Satur- day in July, 1900 and 1910 282 87. Average annual deficit per working family in Ohio, by occu- pations, 1885 . . . . . . . . 297 88. Average earnings of factory workers, for a year of 300 working days, 1904 . . . . . 298 89. Average annual earnings of male employees in manufactures, collated with the percentages of foreign-born, in the principal states, 1900 300-301 90. Average annual earnings of female employees in manufactures, collated with the percentages of foreign-born, in the prin- cipal states, 1900 . . . . . . . 3 QI 91. Weekly hours of labor in Massachusetts, 1872 and 1903 . 313 92. Per cent distribution of factory operatives by weekly hours of labor in New York City and in New York state outside of New York City, 1901-1910 . . . 3*7 93. Per cent of children under sixteen employed in factories, in the United States and in six leading manufacturing states, and per cent of foreign-born, 1909 . 3'9 94. Distribution, by parent nativity and color, of the number of children of both sexes, ten to fifteen years of age, engaged in manufactures and mechanical pursuits, by geographi- cal divisions, 1900 ..... 3 20 95. Cotton-mill operatives under fourteen years of age in the principal manufacturing states, 1900 96. Organization of native and immigrant labor . . -327 97. Organization of immigrant labor ... .328 98. Number and date of organization of active labor unions in six industrial states . . 334 99. Total wages paid to factory operatives in the United States and in the states of New York and Kansas, 1899 and 1909 . . . 33 xxvi Contents TABLE PACB 100. Per cent ratio of trade-union membership to urban popula- tion in New York and Kansas, 1900-1909 . . . 339 101. Comparative union membership in the state of New York and in the city of New York, 1900 .... 342 1 02. Comparative union membership in the state of New York and in the city of New York, 1900-1910 . . . 343 103. Number of strikes in Massachusetts, 1830-1905, and Penn- sylvania, 1835-1905 344 104. Strikes and immigration of breadwinners by decennial peri- ods, 1861-1905 . .... 345 105. Agricultural labor unions and strikes among agricultural laborers in Italy 350 1 06. Per cent distribution, by nativity, of lodgers at municipal lodging-house in New York City during January, Feb- ruary, and March, 1908, and of the male population twenty-one years of age and over at the XII. Census . 355 107. Per cent distribution, by nativity, of foreign-born recipients of charity, 1854-1860 and 1885-1895, and of the popu- lation of New York City, 1855 and 1890 . . 356 .108. Comparative percentages of English and Irish paupers in Boston, 1837-1845, and in New York City, 1885-1895 356 109. Per cent distribution of charity cases in New York City, by nativity and causes of need 357 no. Comparative growth of the value of the products of the cloth- ing industry in New York and Baltimore, 1890-1905 . 369 in. Per cent distribution of foreign-born adult male clothing workers, eighteen years of age and over, residing in the United States less than five years, by race and weekly earnings 370 112. Per cent of striking employees in the clothing industry and in all the United States, 1887-1905 . . . .373 113. Percentage of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe among the textile mill operatives of Massachusetts, 1880-1900 379 114. Average yearly earnings of cotton-mill operatives, by sex and age, in the principal states, 1904 .... 383 115. Distribution of the operatives of both sexes in the woollen and worsted mills of Lawrence, Mass., by parent nativ- ity, 1900 386 1 16. Number of native Americans of native parentage employed in the woolen and worsted mills of Lawrence, 1 900 and 1 909 387 117. Per cent increase in the rates of wages paid by one of the two largest worsted mills in Lawrence to skilled and un- skilled operatives, in 1889-1899 and 1899-1909 . 389 Contents xxvii TABLE PAGE 1 1 8. Classification of employees in selected rolling mills of Ohio, by rates of weekly wages, 1884 . . . . 395 119. Daily wages of employees in steel company No. i, 1880- 1908 398 120. Comparative wages of laborers in rolling mills, Ohio, 1884- 1902 .. 39 8 121. Employees of Carnegie Steel Company plants in Allegheny County, Pa., classified by skill and racial group, March, 1907 402 122. Per cent of skilled iron and steel workers, by location . . 406 123. Per cent of skilled iron and steel workers, with specified earn- ings in Eastern and Southern mills .... 407 124. Per cent of employees in each department earning twenty-five cents and over per hour, in the Pittsburgh and the Southern District ....... 408 125. Growth of population and of the production of coal, 1880- 1910 . 419 126. Number of wage-earners employed in anthracite coal mines, and production of coal by five-year periods, 1870-1909 . 437 127. Union scale of wages in bituminous coal mines, 1898-1908 . 440 128. Wage scale of employees in the coal mines of one steel com- pany in Pennsylvania, 1895-1908 .... 441 129. Per cent of adult bituminous coal-mine workers of selected races earning each specified amount per day, by locality 44 2 130. Membership of the United Mine Workers of America, 1890- 1904 .... -447 131. Number and per cent distribution of fatal accidents in coal mines of West Virginia, by principal causes and nativity of persons killed, 1899-1908, and per cent distribution of employees by nativity, 1900 474 132. Number and per cent of total accidents to coal miners, clas- sified by nativity and length of experience in West Vir- ginia, 1899-1908 . . 477 133. Indices of manufactures, mining, and transportation: 1910, 1914, 1918 . -495 134. Net immigration or emigration of breadwinners, 1915* I 9 I9 .... ; 498 135. Purchasing power of union wage rates, measured by retail prices of food, 1913-1918 . S^ 1 136. Proportion of malnourished school children in the Borough of Manhattan, New York City 5<>4 137. Wheat produced, exported, and retained for consumption, 1911-1918 . , , . i , 5 06 xxviii Contents TABLE PACK 138. Index numbers of the yearly production, and prices of veg- etable products, 1913-1918 . 507 APPENDIX I. Annual average immigration distributed by occupa- tions, 1861-1910 531 II. Fluctuations of employment of male wage-earners in the month of May, 1899 . . 53 1 III. Maximum and minimum numbers of wage-earners em- ployed in manufactures during any one month, number and per cent unemployed, 1899, and per cent foreign-born engaged in manufacturing and mechanical pursuits, 1900^ by sex and by states, 533 IV. Percentage ratios of unemployed and of foreign white breadwinners in the principal occupations, 1900, 536 V. Bituminous coal mines: greatest and least numbers employed, per cent unemployed at any time during the year 1902, and per cent foreign white miners in 1900, in the principal states .... 538 VI. Laborers, male: per cent foreign white, and per cent unemployed, by states, 1900 . . . -539 VII. Cotton-mill operatives, male: per cent foreign white and per cent unemployed, by states, 1900 . . 540 VIII. Persons employed in all industries of Massachusetts, 1888-1908 541 IX. Immigrant breadwinners destined for Massachusetts, 1897-1908 . . . . . . . 541 X. Increase or decrease of the number of breadwinners, classified by sex, nativity, and occupation, in the United States, 1890-1900 . . . 542 XI. Number and increase or decrease, of foreign-born white male breadwinners, classified by nationality and occupation, 1890-1900 . . Facing 544 XII. Foreign-born engaged in gainful occupations in Ger- many, 1900 . -545 XIII. Foreign born in Germany, by country of birth, 1880- 1900 545 XIV. Foreign-born population from the Scandinavian coun- tries and from Southern and Eastern Europe, by states, 1880, 1890, 1900, and 1910 . . . 546 XV. Emigration from the United Kingdom, by destination of emigrants, 1840-1909 . . . . . 546 Contents xxix TABLH XVI. Congestion in Dublin: classification of tenements of four rooms or less, by number of rooms and by num- ber of persons per tenement, 1901 . . .548 XVII. Representative household expenditures for food in the iron district of the South, for the period of one week in 1909 ........ 549 XVIII. Earnings and expenses in Massachusetts, 1800, 1830, and 1860 ....... 549 XIX. Average income and expenditures of wage-earners in specified occupations, in New Jersey, 1885 . 550 XX. Average income and expenditures of unskilled laborers in New Jersey, classified by nativity and source of income, 1885 ....... 550 XXI. Average wages and average expenses of working families with deficits, in Ohio, 1885 55 1 XXII. Organized workers and male white breadwinners, en- gaged in non-agricultural pursuits, in Illinois and New Jersey, classified by nativity . . . 552 XXIII. Male labor-union membership and immigration, New York state, 1897-1910 ..... 552 XXIV. Urban population, membership of labor unions and per- centage of organized industrial wage-earners in New York and Kansas, 1900-1909 . . -553 XXV. Daily wages in steel company No. i, 1880-1908 . . 553 XXVI. Per cent of machine-mined bituminous coal, and per cent ratio of foreign born from Southern and East- ern Europe for each of the principal coal-producing states, 1900 and 1910 . ... 555 XXVII. Per cent of miners of Southern and Eastern European parentage, lives lost per million tons, and per 1,000 employees, in bituminous coal mines . . . 555 XXVIII. Number of employees, and fatal accident rates in the anthracite mines of Pennsylvania, 1870-1909 . 556 XXIX. Number of fatal accidents, and ratio per 1,000 em- ployees on railroads and in coal mines, 1889-1908 . 557 XXX. Arrival and departure of aliens, 1908-1920 . . 558 XXXI. Immigration and emigration of breadwinners, 1915- 1919 ..... 559 XXXII. Comparison of persons seeking work and workers called for by employers at public employment offices in the state of New York, 1916-1918 . . 559 XXXIII. Exports or principal breadstuffs, other than wheat, from the United States, 1910-1918 . . .560 LIST OF DIAGRAMS DIAGRAM PAGB I. Immigration and business conditions, 1880-1910 . 87 II. Movement of third-class passengers between the United States and European ports, 1899-1909 . 89 III. Monthly immigration and emigration, from July, 1907, to May, 1909 . ... -91 IV. Relative per capita production of coal, agricultural staples and live stock I0 5 V. Average number of male wage-earners employed in manufactures in the United States and in principal states, by months, 1899 118 VI. Per cent unemployed 122 VII. Per cent unemployed at any time during the year, and per cent of foreign born in fifty leading occupations, 1900 . 133 VIII. Ratio of unemployment in bituminous coal mines, 1902, and percentage of foreign-born miners, 1900 . 134 IX. Ratio of unemployment of factory workert m Massachu- setts, and number of immigrant breadwinners des- tined for Massachusetts, 1897-1908 . . -139 X. Average number of days worked in the bituminous coal mines of Pennsylvania, and number of immigrant miners and laborers destined for Pennsylvania, 1901-1909 141 XI. Days of employment in organized trades in the state of New York, and number of immigrant breadwin- - ners destined for New York, 1897-1909 . .144 XII. Per cent of increase of the production of coal in the United States, Germany, and Great Britain, 1890- 1909 .184 XIII. Production of pig iron in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom, 1880-1910 . . 184 XIV. Emigration from Germany to all countries outside of the United States, and per cent of Southern and Eastern European immigration to the total immi- gration to the United States, 1890-1904 . . 195 XV. Increase of Scandinavians and of Southern and Eastern Europeans in a group of eleven western states and in the remainder of the United States, 1 880- 1 9 1 o . 197 Contents DIAGRAM PACK XVI. Net emigration from the United Kingdom, by destina- tion, 1895-1909 214 XVII. Per cent ratio of home owners and tenants to all families, classified by age periods and by geographical divi- sions, 1890 280-281 XVIII. Average daily wages of railroad employees, 1891-1909 . 304 XIX. Medians of relative cost of living and average of bien- nial medians of relative wages, 1861-1865 . . 308 XX. Labor-union membership in the state of New York, number of immigrant breadwinners destined for the state of New York, and combined imports and exports through the port of New York, 1897-1910 336 XXI. Male union membership in the states of New York and Kansas, 1900-1909, per cent ratio to the number of industrial wage-earners in 1900 . . . 340 XXII. Number of persons employed in bituminous coal mines, 1880, 1889, and 1907 ..... 420 XXIII. Per cent of bituminous coal mined by machine, 1900 and 1910, compared with per cent ratio of Southern and Eastern European miners to all miners, 1900; and with per cent ratio of Southern and Eastern Europeans to the total population, 1910, for the principal states ...... 429 XXIV. Coal production by months, in Illinois, 1906-1910 . 433 XXV. Fatal accident rates in coal mines per 1,000 workmen employed in the United States and foreign coun- tries 469 XXVI. Fatal accident rates in coal mines, 1889-1908, and per- centage of miners of 'Slavic and Italian parentage in 1900, in the principal states . . . 472 XXVII. Fatal accident rates in anthracite coal mines, 1870-1909 479 XXVIII. Fatal accident rates per 1,000 employees on railroads and in coal mines, 1889-1908 .... 485 XXIX. Indices of physical production for agriculture, mining, and manufacture, 1899-1919 .... 496 MAPS Per cent ratio of native white children under five years of age, born of native mothers, to native white females fifteen to forty- four years of age in cities of less than 25,000 inhabitants and rural territory, 1900 . . . Facing 227 Production of coal in states with an annual output of not less than 1,000,000 tons 416-417 Immigration and Labor PART I SUMMARY REVIEW IT is the purpose of this review to state briefly for the benefit of the busy reader the results of our inquiry into the various phases of the immigration question. Such a summary must necessarily be dogmatic in form. Every proposition is advanced here, however, merely as a theorem, whose demonstration is presented in its proper place, in another part of the book. It is recognized on all sides that the present movement for restriction of immigration has a purely economic object: the restriction of competition in the labor market. Organized labor demands the extension of the protectionist policy to the home market in which "hands" the laborer 's only commodity are offered for sale. The advocates of restric- tion believe that every immigrant admitted to this country takes the place of some American workingman. At the inception of the restrictionist movement, in the 8o's and the early 90*8, they were avowedly opposed to immigration in general. The subsequent decline of immigration from the British Isles, Germany, and the Scandinavian countries and the increase of immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe have diverted the attack from immigration in general to "the new immigration" from Southern and Eastern 2 2 Immigration and Labor Europe an4 the Asiatic provinces of Turkey. Yet while the root of 'allevil is now sought in the racial makeup of the new imniigratioi?; as contrasted- with the old, every objection to the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe is but an echo of the complaints which were made at an earlier day against the then new immigration from Ireland, Germany, and even from England. Three quarters of a century ago, as to-day, the only good immigrants were the dead immigrants. There is no real ground for the popular opinion that the immigrants of the present generation are drawn from a poorer class than their predecessors. It is a historical fact that prior to 1820 the great majority of the immigrants were too poor to prepay their passage, which never cost as much as $50 per steerage passenger; the usual way for a poor man to secure transportation for himself and family was to con- tract to be sold into servitude after arrival. The next gene- ration of immigrants was not much better off. According to contemporary testimony, the millions of Irish and Germans who came in the middle of the nineteenth century were ignorant and accustomed to a very low standard of living. Since the races of Southern and Eastern Europe have become predominant among immigrants to the United States, the steerage rates have been doubled, the increase being equivalent to a heavy head tax. The higher cost of transportation must have raised the financial standard of the new immigration, as compared with the immigrant? of the 70*5 and the early 8o's. This inference is borne out by the fact that the percentage of illiteracy is much lower among the immigrants than among their countrymen who remain at home. Illiteracy is generally the effect of pov- erty. The higher literacy of the immigrant may be accep- ted as evidence that economically the immigrant must be above the average of his mother country. The complaint that the new immigrants do not easily "assimilate" is also as old as immigration itself. To-day the Germans are reckoned by courtesy among the " English- "Summary Review 3 speaking races." But as late as the middle of the nineteenth century the growth of German colonies in all large cities caused the same apprehension in the minds of their Ameri- can contemporaries as the Jewish, the Italian, and the Slav colonies of our day. Statistics show, however, that the new immigrant races number among them as large a percentage of English-speaking persons as the Germans who have lived in the United States the same length of time. The only real difference between the old immigration and the new is that of numbers. To the workman wKo com- plains that he has been crowded out of his job by another, it would afford little comfort to feel that the man who had taken his place was of Teuton or Celtic, rather than of Latin or Slav stock. The true reason why the "old immi- gration " is preferred is that there is very much less of it. As stated, the demand for restriction proceeds from the assumption that the American labor market is overstocked ; by immigration. Comparative statistics of industry and population in the United States show, however,' that immi- gration merely follows opportunities for employment. In times of business expansion immigrants enter in increasing numbers; in times of business dcglfcjsion their numbers decline. The immigration movemW^.is further balanced by emigration from the United States. As a rule, the causes which retard immigration also accelerate the return move- ment from this country. It is customary to condemn the "bird of passage," but so long as there are variations in business activity from season to season and from year to year, the American wage-earner has no cause to complain of the immigrants who choose to leave this country tempo- rarily while there is no demand for their services, thereby reducing unemployment in its acutest stage. It is broadly asserted by restriction advocates that the hundreds of thousands of Slav, Italian, Greek, Syrian, and other immigrant mine and mill workers have been "im- ported" by capitalists- in other words, that they are all con- tract laborers. This belief offers to the student of folk-lore 4 Immigration and Labor a typical example of twentieth century myth-building. None of the official investigations of immigration has disclosed any evidence of importation of laborers under contract on a large scale, although prior to the enactment of the law of 1885 excluding contract laborers there was no reason to conceal the fact. It is quite conceivable that in the case of a strike a great corporation might have resorted to the importation of a large force of strikebreakers re- gardless of cost. As a general rule, however, with hundreds of thousands of immigrants coming to this country an- nually, it would be a waste of money to "induce" immi- gration. The few actual violations of the contract labor law that elude the vigilance of the immigration authorities cannot affect the labor market. The real agents who regulate the immigration movement are the millions of earlier immigrants already in the United States. It is they that advance the cost of passage of a^ large proportion of the new immigrants. When the outlook for employment is good, they send for their relatives, or encourage their friends to come. When the demand for labor is slack, the foreign-born workman must hold his savings in reserve, JJorovide for possible loss of employ- ment. At such tim(Jpo wage-earner will assume the bur- den of providing for a relative or friend, who might for a long time be unable to secure employment. It is in this way that the business situation in the United States reacts upon the volume of immigration. The fluctuating supply of immigrant labor, like that of any other commodity, may sometimes outrun the demand and at other times lag behind it, yet, if we compare the totals for industrial cycles, com- prising years of panic, of depression, and of prosperity, within the past sixty years, we find that the ratio of immi- gration to population has been well-nigh constant. In the long run immigration adjusts itself to the demand for labor. This proposition seems to be inconsistent with the pres- ence at all times of a vast number of unemployed. Ap- parently, there are already more men than jobs in the Summary Review United States; every new immigrant, in order to live, must take away the job from some one else who has been here before. On closer study, however, it is found that unem- "jgT: ployment is not the effect of an absolute surplus population. .' It arises, notwithstanding a growing demand for labor, from the fluctuations in the distribution of the demand. The most generally recognized cause of unemployment is sea- sonal variation of business activity. There are trades dependent largely upon climatic conditions and partly upon social customs. In the period of maximum activity the demand for labor in such trades may often so far exceed the supply as to necessitate overtime work; yet this shortage of labor will not save a portion of the force from idleness at other times of the year. The only class of labor which is L/ capable of shifting from one industry to another in response to variations in demand is unskilled labor. But the locali- zation of industries sets a limit to the mobility of unskilled labor. In order to eliminate unemployment it would be necessary to dovetail the busy and the slack seasons in the various industries upon such a plan as would produce an even distribution of the work of thej^^n over all seasons of the year. This might be possij^ ^tonines, mills, and transportation lines were operatedB Ration- wide trust. So long, however, as production iSHPned by many com- peting employers, each subject to his own vicissitudes of business, insecurity of employment is inevitable. The normal state of every industry is o have a larger force than can ever find employment in it at any one time. The labor reserve is as much a part of the industrial system as the regular force. / Still, the labor market being normally overstocked, it sounds plausible that the immigrant, who is accustomed to a lower standard of living at home than the American work- man, will be able to underbid and displace his American competitor. : 'lf this view were correct, we should find, in the first place, a higher percentage of unemployment among j *v, - than among the foreign-born breadwinners. Immigration and Labor Statistics, however, show that the proportion of unemploy- ment is the same for native and foreign-born wage-earners. The immigrant has no advantage over the native American in securing or retaining employment. In the next place, , we should find more unemployment in those sections of the United States where the immigrants are most numerous. In fact, however, the ratio of unemployment in manufac- tures is the same in the North Atlantic States with a large immigrant population as in the South Atlantic States where the percentage of foreign-born is negligible. Coal miners are thought to have suffered most from immigration. Yet it ap- pears that Pennsylvania, which is among the States with the highest percentages of foreign-born miners, has the second lowest percentage of unemployment. The highest ratio of unemployment , according to the latest published census data, was found in West Virginia, where the percentage of foreign- born miners was next to the lowest. A similar relation between unemployment and the proportion of immigrants is observed among cotton-mill operatives and common labor- ers: immigrants are not attracted to those States where opportunities for j^ular employment are less favorable. Furthermore, ijfl Hoisted a causal connection between immigration anr: i fcyment, there should have been more unemployrnMMMRose years when immigration was greater, and vice versa. The figures show, on the contrary, that there was less unemployment during the first seven years of the present century with immigration at a high tide than during the preceding decade when immigration was at a low ebb. Still an oversupply of labor may produce a latent form of unemployment which could be described as underemploy- ment: all employees may be kept on the rolls, and yet be idle a part of every week. Again, however, we find that the average number of days of employment per wage-earner increases as immigration increases^-and declines as immi- gration declines. Summary Review 7 The relation between immigration and unemployment may thus be su> -JV^J 1 ^J 16 following propositions: Unemployment and immigf ati6tf are the effects of economic \forces working in opposite directions: those^ which produce business expansion reduce unemployment and attract immi- gration; those which produce business depression increase unemployment and reduce immigration. Yet it may be said that while immigration is not a con- tributory cause of unemployment, restriction of immigra- tion might nevertheless reduce unemployment. This sup- position is negatived by the experience of Australia, where emigration exceeds immigration. Australia is a new coun- try with an area as great as that of the United States, while its population at the census of 1906 was half a million short of the population of New York City at the census of 1910. / Yet Australia has as much unemployment as the State of New York, which is teeming with immigrants. It is evident that unemployment is produced by the modern organiza- tion of industry even in the absence of immigration. There is a widespread belief that, although on the whole the United States is in need of immigrant labor, "the new immigration" has a tendency to stagnate in the overpopu- lated cities, while there is a keen demand for hands in agri- cultural sections. A retrospective view of the history of Immigration shows that this tendency is not peculiar to "the new immigration." For the past ninety years public men ancf social theorists have sought to relieve unemploy- ment in the cities by directing the current of immigration to the farm, but the immigrants have always preferred to seek employment in the cities. The popular mind Which accounts for individual conduct by the "free will" of the individual applies the same criterion to social phenomena: the Italians and the Slavs concentrate in the cjties because they have a "racial tendency" to concentrate^ the cities. That most of the immigrants of those nationalities have grownup in agricultural communities a'nd that many of them after working a few years in a great American city return 8 Immigration and Labor home and go back to the soil, argues against the assumption "lota "racial" dislike for agriculture. The real cause of the Concentration of immigrants in the cities is economic. Even the "desirable" immigrant from Northern and Western . Europe who lands with a capital of fifty and odd dollars ** lacks the funds to rent a farm. At best he can obtain em- ployment only as a farm hand. Since the early days of Irish V and German immigration, however, the growing industries of the cities have offered a better market for labor than agriculture. The industrial development of the United States has manifested itself in a relative, and in some sections an absolute, depopulation of rural territory. There is a large migration of native Americans of native stock from country to city. This movement is the result of the revolution , in American farming conditions and methods, which has * tended to reduce the demand for labor on the farm. The American farm of the first half of the nineteenth century was .the seat of a highly diversified industry. The members of a farm household made their own tools and part of the furni- ture; they were spinners and weavers; they made their own Clothes, and soap and candles for their own use. WitlTsuch a variety of occupations there was work for a hired man at all seasons of the year. But industrial differentiation has removed from the farm one industry after another. The time during which a hired man can be kept employed on the farm has been reduced in consequence to a few months in the year. Still until the middle of the nineteenth century the mills were quite commonly run by water power, which made for decentralization of manufactures. The small country towns accordingly offered to the farm laborer a prospect of employment when work was scarce on the farm. But the general substitution of steam for water power led to the removal of factories from small towns to great commer- /xaal centers. The opportunity to. earn a full year's wages ( in a rural community was gone. While in manufacturing 'the invention of labor-saving Summary Review 9 machinery has resulted in the gradual displacement of the small proprietor by the wage-earner, in American agriculture, on the contrary, the machine has tended to eliminate the wage-earner. As late as the middle of the nineteenth century the agricultural methods of the American farmer differed little from those of his ancestors. Grass was mowed with a scythe. Grain was cut with a sickle and threshed with a flail. Flailing and winnowing grain was the chief farm work of the winter. Corn was planted by hand, cultivated with the hoe, and shelled by scraping the ears against the handle of a frying pan. The cultivation of a farm in this primitive way sustained a demand for steady farm help in all seasons. To-day there is some implement or machine for every kind of farm work. It is estimated that the quan- tity of labor saved by machinery represents the services of one and a half million men working every week day in the year. In consequence of limited demand', agricultural labor is the least remunerative of all occupations. The hours of labor* on the farm are longer than even in the steel mills of Pennsylvania. Small pay, long hours, and irregular employment is what the immigrant can expect on a farm. His preference for city work which pays better can be easily explained without delving into the mysteries of race psy- chology. It merely confirms the rule that immigration follows the demand for labor. The effect of immigration upon labor in the United States ^_ has been, a readjustment of the population on the scalejof ^ occupations. The majority of Americans of native paren- tage are engaged in farrning, in business, in trie? professions, and in clerical pursuits, f The majority of the immigrants, ^ on the other hand, are industrial wage-earners. Only in exceptional cases has this readjustment been attended by actual displacement of the native or Americanized wage- earner. In the course o^trial evolution some fr^es have declined owing to thr !i :; reduction of new methods ot production. In such cases there was naturally a decrease of io Immigration and Labor the number of native as well as of foreign-born workers. As a rule, however, the supply of immigrant labor has been absorbed by the increasing demand for labor in all industries without leaving a surplus sufficient to displace the native or older immigrant wage-earner. There were but a few occu- pations which showed an actual, not a relative decrease of native Americans of native stock. This decrease was due to the disinclination of the young generation to follow the pursuits of their fathers; the new accessions from native stock were insufficient to replace the older men as they were dying off, and the vacancies were gradually filled up by immigrants. But for every position given up by a native American there were many new openings filled by native American wage-earners. The westward movement of American and Americanized wage-earners and the concentration of immigrants in a few Eastern and Central States have been interpreted as the "displacement" of the English-speaking workmen from the mills and mines of the East by the new immigration. An examination of the figures shows, however, that durinf the past thirty years mining and manufacturing grew much faster in the West and South than in the East and drew some of the native workers and earlier immigrants from the older manufacturing. States. But the demand for labor grew in the old States as well. The places left vacant by the old employees who had gone westward had to be filled by new immigrants. The desertion of mills and factories by native American girls has also been explained as their "displacement" by immigrants. The motive assigned is not economic, but racial : it is the social prejudice against the immigrant that has forced the American girl to quit. It seems, however, that this explanation mistakes cause for effect: the social stigma attaching to working association with immigrants is not the cause but the effect of the desertion of the mills and factories by native American women. The psychological interpretation overlooks one of the greatest economic Summary Review n changes that has taken place in the United States since the Civil War: the admission of women to most of the pursuits which were formerly regarded as peculiarly masculine. For every native woman of American parentage who left the mill or clothing factory there were forty women of the same nativity who found new openings. The increase of the number of native American professional women was nearly five times as great as the decrease of the number of native American factory girls. The marvelous progress of the, American educational system has fitted the native American^ woman for other work than manual labor and has at the same time opened to her a new field in which she does not meet the competition of the immigrant. There is absolutely no statistical proof of an oversupply of unskilled labor resulting in the displacement of native * by immigrant laborers. No decrease of the number of common laborers among the native white of native or for- eign parentage appears in any of the great States which serve as receptacles for immigration. The same is true of miners. In none of the States affected by the new immi- gration has there been a decrease in the number of native miners. Such States as Pennsylvania and Illinois showed large increases in the number of native miners, both of for- eign and native parentage. The iron and steel mills are another industry from which the recent immigrants are popularly believed to have forced out the native workmen and older English-speaking immigrants.. The fact is, that in the earlier period of the industry, when immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was negligible, the number of American employees increased very slowly; during the recent period, on the contrary, since the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe have been coming in large numbers, the number of American-born employees of every nativity has more than doubled. The increased employment of native Americans is recorded in the figures for every im- portant iron- and steel-producing State, as well as for every city holding a leading place in the iron and steel industry. 12 Immigration and Labor The effect of immigration upon the occupational distribu- tion of the industrial wage-earners has been the elevation of the English-speaking workmen to the status of an aris- tocracy of labor, while the immigrants have been employed to perform the rough work of all industries. Though the in- troduction of machinery has had the tendency to reduce the relative number of skilled mechanics, yet the rapid pace of industrial expansion has increased the number of skilled and supervisory positions so fast that practically all the English- ^ speaking employees have had the opportunity to rise on the scale of occupations. This opportunity, however, was con- ditioned upon a corresponding increase of the totM opera- ting force. It is only because the new immigration has ! furnished the class of unskilled laborers that the native "~ workmen and older immigrants have been raisedVt .ges of English-speakii "~kmen and of decent imnr : ts. Summary Review 23 But it is argued that the newly arrived immigrant must have work at once and is therefore glad to accept any terms. The Immigration Commission after a study of the earnings of more than half a million employees in mines and manu- factures, has discovered no evidence that immigrants have been hired for less than the prevailing rates of wages. The primary cause which has determined the movement of wages in the United States during the past thirty years has been the introduction of labor-saving machinery. The effect of the substitution of mechanical devices for human skill is the displacement of the skilled mechanic by the unskilled laborer. This tendency has been counteracted in the United States by the expansion of industry: while the* ratio of skilled mechanics to the total operating force was decreasing, the increasing scale of operations prevented an actual reduction in numbers. Of course this adjustment did not proceed without friction. While, in the long run, there has been no displacement of skilled mechanics J3y unskilled laborers in the industrial field as a whole, yet at certain times and places individual skilled mechanics were doubtless dispensed with and had to seek new employment. The unskilled laborers who replaced them were naturally engaged at lower wages. The fact that most of these unskilled laborers were immigrants disguised the substance of the change the substitution of unskilled for skilled labor and made it appear as the displacement of highly- paid native by cheap immigrant labor. To prove that immigration has virtually lowered the rates of wages, would require a comparative study of wages paid for the same class of labor in various occupations before and after the great influx of immigration. This, however, has never been attempted by the advocates of restriction. In fact, the -chaotic state of our wage statistics precludes any but a fragmentary comparison for different periods. In a general way, however, all available data for the period of " the old immigration" agree in that the wages of unskilled laborers, and even of some of the skilled mechanics, did not 24 Immigration and Labor fully provide for the support of the wage-earner and his family in accordance with their usual standards of living. The shortage had to be made up by the labor of the wife and children. If the tendency of the new immigration were to lower the rate of wages or to retard the advance of wages, it should be expected that wages would be lower in great cities where the recent immigrants are concentrated, than in rural districts where the population is mostly of native birth. All wage statistics, concur, however, in the opposite conclusion. Since the United States has become a manufacturing coun- try average earnings per worker have been higher in the cities than in the country. The same difference exists within the same trades between the large and the small cities. Country competition of native Americans often acts as a depressing factor upon the wages of recent immigrants. This fact has been demonstrated in the clothing industry, in the cotton mills, in the coal mines, etc. Furthermore, if immigration tends to depress wages, this tendency must manifest itself in lower average earnings in States with a large immigrant population than in States with a predominant native population. No such tendency, however, is discernible from wage statistics. As a rule, annual earnings are higher in States with a higher per- centage of foreign-born workers. The conditions in some of the leading industries employ- ing large numbers of recent immigrants point to the same conclusions. In the Pittsburgh steel mills the rates of wages of various grades of employees have varied directly with the proportion of recent immigrants. The wageL of the aristo- crats of labor, none of whom are Southern or Eastern Europeans, have been reduced in some cases as much as 40 per cent; the money wages of the skilled and semi-skilled workers, two thirds of -whom are natives or old immigrants, have not advanced notwithstanding the increased cost of living, while the wages of the unskilled laborers, the bulk Summary Review 25 of whom are immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, have been going up. " Another typical immigrant industry is the manufacture of clothing. The clothing industry has become associated in the public mind with the sweating system, and since the employees are, with few exceptions, immigrants from South- ern and Eastern Europe, the conclusion is readily reached that the root of the sweating system is in the character of the new immigration. Yet the origin of the sweating sys- tem preceded the Jewish clothing workers by more than half a century. Throughout the second quarter of the past century native American and Irish women worked in the s,weat shops of New York, Boston, and Philadelphia for only board and lodging, or even for board alone, depending upon their families for other necessities, whereas the Jewish fac- tory girls of the present day are at least self-supporting. In the cotton mills of New England the last quarter of the nineteenth century, when the operatives were practically all of the English-speaking races, was a period of intermittent advances and reductions in wages ; on the whole, wages re- mained stationary. The first years of the present century, up to the crisis of 1908, were marked by the advent of the Southern and Eastern Europeans into the cotton mills, and by an uninterrupted upward movement of wages. The competition of the cheap American labor of the Southern cotton mills, however, tends to keep down the wages of the Southern and Eastern European, Armenian, and Syrian immigrants employed in the New England mills. As a general rule, the employment of large numbers of recent immigrants has gone together with substantial advances in wages. This correlation between the move-^ " ' ments of wages and immigration is not the manifestation of some mysterious racial trait, but the plain working of the law of supply and demand. The employment of a high^ , percentage of immigrants in any section, industry, oroccupa-~ - tion, is an indication of an active demand for labor in pv-.ss 26 Immigration and Labor of the native supply. Absence of immigrants is a sign of a dull labor market. To be sure, the rise in wages is paralleled by a similar movement of prices. The employer of labor seeks to recoup the advance in wages by advancing the price of his product to the consumer. When the advance in the price of manu- factured products becomes general, the wage-earner as a consumer is forced in effect to give up a part or all of his gain in the money rate of wages. The increased cost of living then stimulates further demands for advances in wages. Since combinations of capital in all fields of industry have reduced competition among employers of labor to a minimum, the wage-earners have been at a disadvantage in this continuous bargaining. In general it has been observed by economists that wages, as a rule, do not rise as fast as prices. That this rule holds true irrespective of immigra- tion, is illustrated by the movement of wages and prices during the Civil War. With the exception of the first year, the period was one of prosperity in every branch of industry. The wage-earners were apparently in a favorable situation. The army drew hundreds of thousands of workers from industrial pursuits, while immigration declined. There were at that time no immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, nor was there any oversupply of unskilled labor. Yet while the depreciation of the currency caused a rapid increase in the cost of living, money wages did not keep pace with prices. In other words, real wages decreased. It must be noted that during the war a lively labor agitation was going on; strikes were usually successful. Withal, labor was unable to win increases in wages commensurate with the increased cost of living. Among the factors tending to depress the rate of wages child labor holds a prominent place. The most significant fact to be noted concerning the relation between child labor \and immigration is the large proportion of children em- . ployed in factories in States where there is practically no immigrant population, whereas the lowest per cent is found Summary Review 27 in New York, which is overrun by immigrants. The growth of manufacturing industries in the South being re- stricted by the natural increase of her native population, the manufacturers, in order to extend their operations, must resort to the employment of children, as did their prede- cessors in New England a century ago, before immigration came to supply the needs of American industry. This situ- ation is by no means confined to the South. Absence of ! foreign immigration has created a demand for the labor of native American children in the canneries and shoe factories of rural and semi-rural Missouri. The principal induce- ment for locating new shoe factories in rural sections of Missouri appears to be the availability of the cheap labor of native American women and children, who can underbid the male immigrants employed in the shoe factories of Massachusetts. On the other hand, taking the United States as a whole, we find that during the ten-year period from 1899 to 1909, with its unprecedented immigration, the average number of children employed in factories did not increase, while their relative number decreased. An unerring measure of the effects of immigration on\ labor conditions is furnished by the length of the working day. Aside from the benefits of shorter hours for the physi- cal and mental well-being of the wage-earner, every reduc- tion of the hours of labor, even when not accompanied by an increase of the daily or weekly wage, is equivalent to an increase of the hourly wage. Going back to the beginnings of the factory system in the United States, when the opera- tives were sons and daughters of American farmers, we find that the hours of labor in the factories were from sunrise to sunset, the same as on the farms to-day. The retirement of the native element and their replacement by Irish immi- grants was followed by a reduction of the hours of labor in the textile mills. In recent vears the mills have been run with a polyglot help made up of representatives of all the races of Southern and Eastern Europe and Asiatic Turkey. Compared with the time when the operatives were mostly 8 Immigration and Labor Irish, the factory workers have again won a reduction of an hour and a quarter a day. One need not take an optimistic view of labor conditions in the Massachusetts textile mills to recognize that fifty-four hours a week is a great stride in advance since the time when the regular working day was from sunrise to sunset. The effects of the recent immigration upon the length of the working day can be best observed in the State of New York, which is affected by immigration more than any other State in the Union. The first decade of the present century has witnessed the greatest volume of immigration known in the history of the United States, and the bulk of that immi- gration has come from the countries of Southern and East- ern Europe. And yet the reports of the factory inspectors of the State of New York, covering an average of nearly a . million factory employees annually, show for that decade a I gradual reduction of the hours of labor in the State of New I York. Comparing the city of New York with the remain- der of the State, we find that the population of Southern and Eastern European birth in the great city increased during the same period from one sixth to about one fourth of the total population, whereas in the State outside the city of New York the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe constituted in 1910 only one sixteenth of the total population; yet after a decade of "undesirable immigration " more than two thirds of all factory operatives in New York City work ten hours or less on week days with a half holiday on Saturday, whereas in the remainder of the State, with a working population predominantly native, the majority still work longer hours. The lower wages of tiie native American wage-earners in small cities and country towns might be explained by the lower cost of living, which per- mits the native country worker to enjoy a greater measure of comfort than the more highly paid recent immigrant living in a large city. But the longer hours of the native American wage-earner in the country admit of no such explanation. Summary Review 29 Among the many charges against the recent immigrants not the least important one is that their ignorant acquies- cence in dangerous and unsanitary working conditions is a menace to the safety of the older employees. The Immi- gration Commission has accepted without criticism the employers' defense in work accidents, viz., that the majority of accidents arise from the negligence, the ignorance, and inexperience of the employees. There is, however, another side to the question. Many experts hold that most of the risks are humanly preventable, and their continuance is due to economic conditions beyond the control of the employee, Effective prevention of accidents in mines presupposes a carefully planned equipment involving considerable ex- pense. But competition forces the mine operator to follow unsafe mining methods, which inevitably result in unneces- sary sacrifice of human life. It is not the carelessness of the mine workers, but the carelessness of mine operators and their representatives that is, according to expert opinion, the cause of the high fatality rate in American mines. Similar dangerous conditions once existed in France and Belgium, but they were removed by stringent legislation and by an effective enforcement of the law. The theory which shifts the blame for accidents from the mine operator to the Slav miner tends to prevent the enactment of such legislation in the United States,^/ In the iron and steel mills there is the same popular dispo- sition to shift the responsibility for accidents to "the ignorant foreigner," whereas expert opinion views the tre- mendous speed at which the plants are run as the real cause of danger. The greatest risk of death and personal injury is assumed by railway trainmen, who are all either Americans or natives of Northern and Western Europe. They have strong organizations and could not be replaced by non- English-speaking immigrants. Yet "acquiescence in dan- gerous and unsanitary working conditions" appears to be the general attitude of organized and unorganized workers alike, irrespective of nationality. Obviously, organized 30 Immigration and Labor labor does not feel strong enough to make demands which would involve large outlays by employers for safe equip- ment. Organization of labor is nowadays generally recognized in the United States as the most effective of all existing agencies for the increase of wages and improvement of work- ing conditions. It would therefore be a cause for grave con- cern if it were true, as claimed, that the recent immigrants .were not organizable, and that their employment threat- ened the existing labor organizations with disruption. 'f The fact is, however, that the origin and growth of orga- nized labor in the United States are contemporaneous with the period of "the new immigration," and that the immi- grants from Southern and Eastern Europe are the backbone of some of the strongest labor unions. A notable example is the coal-mining industry, where the mine workers' organi- zation has gained strength only since the Southern and Eastern Europeans have become the predominant element among them. One of the most troublesome problems which the organization of these immigrants has had to face has been the competition of the unorganized Americans of .native stock. "^ ^. Before 1880 all labor organizations were small in member- ship and their effect upon economic conditions was negli- gible. Like everywhere, during the infancy of organized labor, a union would spring into existence under the impulse of a strike, would flourish for a while, if successful, and would soon disintegrate. The work of organization has since been proceeding at an ever increasing pace. During the first decade of the new immigration, 1880-1890, more labor unions were organized than throughout the previous history s-l of the United States. The majority of the trade-unionists and Knights of Labor were of foreign birth, whereas the native Americans contributed less Jhan their qftota to the membership of labor organizations. The greatest success rewarded the efforts of union organizers during the first decade of the present century, the membership of labor Summary Review 31 organizations growing faster than the number of wage- earners. Thus the greatest activity in the field of organi- I zation coincided with the unparalleled immigration of the I past decade. The best field for observation of the effects of immigration upon trade-unionism is the State of New York, which receives more than its proportionate share of immi- grants from Southern and Eastern Europe. A comparative study of trade-union statistics compiled by the New York Bureau of Labor and of the federal immigration statistics shows that union membership rises and falls with the rise - and fall of immigration. The fluctuations of union mem- bership depend upon the business situation, which likewise determines the fluctuations of immigration. The harmoni- ous movement of immigration and organization among wage-earners is thus accounted for by the fact that both are stimulated by business prosperity and discouraged by busi- ness depression. The question arises, however, whether the progress of trade-unionism would not have been greater had there been no immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe during the past decade of industrial expansion. An answer to thil ' question is furnished by the comparative growth of trade- union membership in New York and in Kansas. The ratio of foreign-born in Kansas has been steadily decreasing since 1880. At the same time Kansas has shared in the recent industrial expansion. Statistics show that the relative number of organized workmen is much higher in New York with its large and growing Southern and Eastern European population than in Kansas, where more than nine tenths of the population are of native birth. These comparisons prove that recent immigration has not retarded the progress of trade-unionism, except, of course, where it is the policy of the unions to exclude the recent immigrants by prohibitive initiation dues and other restrictive regulations intended to limit the number of com- petitors within their trades. Language is nowadays no longer a bar to organization JL - 32 Immigration and Labor among immigrants. The membership of every union in- cludes a sufficient number of men of every nationality through whom their countrymen can be reached. Many of the more recent immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe had acquired a familiarity with the prin- ciples of organization in their home countries. In Italy organization has lately made rapid progress not only among industrial workers, but also among agricultural laborers. In Russia, previous to the uprising of 1905, labor organi- zations and strikes were treated as conspiracies, but the revolutionary year 1905 outmatched the labor-union record of any other country. The strikes of that year affected one third of all the factories employing three fifths of all factory workers. The total number of strikers, at a conservative estimate, exceeded three and a half millions. The strikers drew together wage-earners of all those nationalities which make up the bulk of our immigration from the Russian Em- pire: Hebrews, Poles, Lithuanians, Russians, and Ukrain- ians. 1 In this connection, it is worthy of note that the organizations of clothing workers in New York City, nearly all of whom are Russian and Polish Jews and Italians, com- prise a higher proportion of the total number employed in the industry than the average trade-union in the United States. If organized labor in the United States has not succeeded in welding together a majority of the wage-earners, the fault is neither with immigration in general, nor with immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe in particular. The primary cause is the substitution of machinery for human skill, which is taking the ground from the craft union. The latter, however, as a rule, does not seek to organize the un- skilled laborers. Situations have arisen where the interests of the craft union have been antagonistic to organization among the unskilled. That organization among the unskilled j J The revolution of 1917 has made organized labor a part of the machinery of government. . Summary Review 33 is feasible, however, has been demonstrated in the coal-mining industry, " - +he Lawrence strike, and in the recent strikes of the steel workers. Another obstacle to the progress of trade-unionism is that the principal industries to-day are controlled by combina- tions, which have reduced competition among employers of labor to a minimum. In a contest of endurance between a trust and a trade-union, the former is able to hold out longer, since it can shift the losses to the consumers. The only successful strikes against trusts have been those in which the majority of the strikers were immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, viz., the strikes in the anthra- cite coal mines of Pennsylvania and in the woolen mills of Lawrence. One of the reasons for the greater power of resistance exhibited by the Southern and Eastern Europeans is the predominance among them of men without families. 1 The single European wage-earner who manages to save a portion of his earnings can fall back on his savings, if necessary. This relieves the pressure upon the strike fund. On the other hand, the families of recent immigrants, being inured to the most simple life in their home countries, can more easily endure the hardships of a strike than the families of native American wage-earners. The Southern and Eastern European strikers are therefore able to hold out longer in a wage contest than the native wage-earner. The defeat of many strikes is charged against the immi- grant, who, though supposedly too tractable under normal conditions, is said to be inclined to violence when aroused. Suffice it to say that strike riots are as old as strikes in the United States. 1 The proportion of married men among the recent immigrants employed in bituminous coal mines varied from 49.4 per cent to 77.2 per cent; the proportion of married men whose families were living abroad averaged 27.9 per cent for all races, varying from 19.5 to 80.4 per cent. Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, Tables 102 and 104. 34 Immigration and Labor On the other hand, however, the United Mine Workers of America, whose members are mostly immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, has put into practical opera- | tion an industrial parliament, with separate representation ifor employers and employees, for the regulation of the terms of employment. It can not be said then "as a general proposition . . . that all improvement in conditions and in- creases in rates of pay have been secured in spite of the presence of the recent immigrant." 1 The results of the preceding discussion can be summed up as follows: (1) Recent immigration has displaced none of the native American wage-earners or of the earlier immigrants, but has only covered the shortage of labor resulting from the excess of the demand over the domestic supply. (2) Immigration varies inversely with unemployment; it has not increased the rate of unemployment. (3) The standard of living of the recent immigrants is not lower than the standard of living of the past generations of immigrants engaged in the same occupations. Recent immigration has not lowered the standard of living of Ameri- cans and older immigrant wage-earners. (4) Recent immigration has not reduced the rates of wages, nor has it prevented an increase in the rates of wages ; it has pushed the native and older immigrant wage-earners upward on the scale of occupations. (5) The hours of labor have been reduced contempo- raneously with recent immigration: s * (6) The membership of labor organizations has grown apace with recent immigration; the new immigrants have contributed their proportionate quota to the membership 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 541. Since the days of the Immigration Commission another experiment in industrial government, inaugurated by recent immigrants in the clothing factory of Hart, Schaffner and Marx, has attracted wide notice among labor leaders and social workers. Summary Review of every labor organization which has not di. against them, and they have firmly stood by their , dons in every contest. ^There is consequently no specific "immigration proble. There is a general labor problem, which comprises man> special problems, such as organization of labor, reduction of hours of labor, child labor, unemployment, prevention of work-accidents, etc. None of these problems being affected by immigration, their solution can not be advanced by restriction or even by complete prohibition of immigration. > The advocates of restriction are conscious of the fact that i without immigration the industrial expansion of the past^ twenty years would have been impossible. But they be- lieve that the pace of progress has been too fast and that the interests of labor would be furthered by a slower devel- opment of industry which would dispense with Southern and Eastern European unskilled laborers. This was the gist of the recommendations of the Immigration Commission. The weak point in this argument is that it takes no cogni- zance of the cardinal principle of modern division of labor, viz., that in every industrial establishment there is a fixed proportion of skilled to unskilled laborers. Were the expan- sion of industry to slow down in consequence of a reduced supply of unskilled labor, the demand for skilled mechanics would eventually decline in proportion. The slow growth of industry would tend to curtail the opportunities for advance-* ment of the wage-earners who are already here. The skilled crafts whose organizations favor the exclusion of unskilled immigrants would be the first to suffer in consequence| On the other hand, the unemployed could gain nothing - from a slow growth of industry. Seasonal and cyclical variations in the general demand for labor, as well as varia- tions in the demands of individual employers, would continue on a reduced scale -of national production. The mere ex- clusion of immigrants will not provide employment for sail- ors in the winter, or for the full winter force of a Wisconsin Immigration and Labor camp in the summer; nor will it revolutionize the A of fashion. In order to provide regular employment ^r all workers, it would be necessary to run all industries upon a common time schedule, like railway trains are run on connecting lines. No plan of such a readjustment has as yet been suggested by the advocates of immigration restric- tion. Certainly an adjustment of the busy and slack seasons of a quarter of a million factories will not spring up spon- taneously from an act of Congress closing the gates against immigrants. The present -crisis, which has followed a period with immigration reduced to insignificant proportions, dem- onstrates how ineffectual restriction of immigration would be as a remedy -against unemployment resulting from cyclical disturbances of capitalistic industry. As a speculative proposition, it seems quite plausible, that f if restriction of immigration resulted in a scarcity of labor, employers would be forced to pay scarcity rates of wages. A standing refutation of this theory is presented by the con- dition which actually exists in the United States throughout the agricultural sections. Few immigrants seek employment on the farms. The number of Southern and Eastern Euro- pean farm laborers in the United States is negligible. More- over, there is a constant stream of native labor from the farms to the cities, which has led to an actual decrease of the rural population in many agricultural counties. Farmers generally complain of scarcity of farm labor during the agricultural season. Nevertheless, the wages of farm laborers are lower than the wages of unskilled laborers in mines and mills where recent jmmigrants predominate. Scarcity of labor has not forced the farmer to pay scarcity wages, but has merely re- tarded the growth of farming. I The World War offered an opportunity to test the effects pf restriction of immigration under the most favorable con- ditions. The United States became the chief producer of war supplies for the allied nations. ' Beginning with the spring of 1916 the supply of labor in the United States fell short of Summary Review 37 the demand. The entrance of the United States into the war withdrew more than two million workers from industry. Officers of the American Federation of Labor and avowed friends of labor were put in charge of the various war boards which were entrusted with the function of regulating wages in the leading industries. If the economic condition of the American wage-earner could be improved by suspension of immigration, its beneficial effects should have materialized during the war. Volumes of statistics on every aspect of the economic situation during the war period have been published. They show a growth' of production much in excess of the rate of the pre-war years. This unparalleled growth of industry was marked by extraordinary profits, which were far beyond anything that was necessary to stimulate initiative and enterprise. At the same time, the growth of population lagged behind J the industrial expansion. To meet the abnormal demand for common labor caused by the cessation of immigration, the Secretary of Labor, a former labor leader, was obliged to suspend the law to permit mine operators and other employers in the Southwest to import Mexican laborers under contract. This abnormal condition brought about an unprecedented I mobility of labor. Reports from every section of the country to Bradstreefs complained of employees "constantly being enticed from their jobs by competition between employers." 1 Employers were offering high rates of wages to union and non- union workers alike. What, f hen, was the effect of this most favorable com- bination of economic factors upon the condition of the Ameri- can wage worker? In such war-time industries as munition plants, some of the occupations enjoyed increases in wages more than suffi- cient to compensate for the increase in the cost of living. 1 The Literary Digest, December I, 1917, P- 80. 38 Immigration and Labor On the other hand, the wages of the railroad workers, coal miners, and farm laborers, lagged behind the increase in j prices. On the whole, wages did not keep pace with the increasing cost of living. The workers merely struggled to keep their old standards of living, and even in this struggle they did not always succeed. The most telling corroboration of the decline in real wages is furnished by the investigations of medical authorities, which show a decided increase of the proportion of underfed school children during the World War. We have thus witnessed a repetition of the labor conditions which prevailed during the Civil War. This lagging of wages /behind the advancing cost of living cannot be explained by i the alleged submissiveness of the immigrant wage- workers, Who are said to be willing to acquiesce in the terms offered to them by the employers. The statistics of strikes during the World War show that during the three years 1916-1918 the number of strikes per year was more than twice the annual average for the period from 1881 to 1905. More than four fifths of the war-time strikes were led by unions. The annual average number of strikers rose to the unprecedented figure of 1,310,000. Moreover, during the war, the principle of collective bargaining was recognized, under the pressure of the government, by all employers engaged on government orders or in the production of essentials. That the foreign worker can not be held responsible for the decline of real wages is further proved by the fact that the real wages of common laborers in the iron and steel industry, most of whom are foreign born, went up, whereas those of locomotive firemen, most of whom are native-born Ameri- cans, declined to a point much below the minimum budget under American standards. Among the potent factors in the decline of real wages must / be noted the movement of labor from agriculture to urban 1 industries. As a result, agricultural "production during the war remained almost stationary, while the demand for bread- Summary Review 39 stuffs was increased by exports abroad. The big interests which control the produce market were thereby enabled to raise the prices of food. What the wage-earner gained in i money wages he was forced to surrender in the higher prices j of necessities of life. . Let us now examine what were the substitutes for immi- grant labor during the war years. The movement of workers from agriculture to urban industries has already been ad- verted to. Public attention was attracted by the migration! of Negroes from the agricultural South to the industrialj North. The volume of that migration is officially estimated at nearly half a million. Agricultural regions of the Southern states began to suffer for want of the Negro worker. Another substitute for immigrant labor was found in the increased nr\\nyr$er\t QJ jwmrTen^aidchildrer>. The main"torce which was driving childrenlnto inclustry r was the excessive cost of living. Labor commissioners and factory inspectors com- plained of the difficulty experienced during the war years in administering child-labor laws. The scarcity of adult labor made the employer ready to take minors into his employ. What, then, is the outlook in the ligl^of the experience of labor in the late war? We are passmg* 'through one of the cyclical disturbances of modern industry with Jtheir attend- ant acute unemployment. But this ericas will-be over, and American industry wiH~resume. s its usual course. If restric- tion of immigration is to become the settled policy of the United States, substitutes for immigrant labor will be sought. The mines and mills of the Southern states which have failed to attract immigrants utilize the labor of farmers and their sons. The millions of tenant-farmers offer great pos- sibilities as an industrial reserve available during the winter months. The farm being their main source of subsistence, they have been willing to offer their labor during the idle winter months more cheaply than freshly landed immigrants. The efforts of trade-union organizers among this class of English-speaking workers have met with scant success. The 39 a Immigration and Labor substitution of the cheap labor of the American farmer foi the labor of the Slav or Italian immigrant, would tend to weaken the unions and to keep down wages. A stimulated movement of labor from the farm to the factory would check the growth of farming; the prices of foodstuffs would rise in consequence, which would tend to offset the advantages to the wage-earners from a possible rise of money wages. The discontinuance of fresh supplies of immigrant labor for the mills and factories of New England would give a new impetus to the establishment of factories in the South, where there is an abundant supply of child labor. Still, should all the substitutes for immigration prove in- adequate, it does not necessarily follow that scarcity prices would rule in the American labor market. It must be borne in mind that capital is international. Billions of American capital are already invested in foreign enterprises. Hereto- fore these investments could not compare with the profits of American industries annually reinvested at home/ If, how- ever, a permanent scarcity of labor were created in the United States, more American capital would seek investment abroad. The increased investment of American capital in the industrial development of foreign countries, with cheap labor, must eventually react upon labor conditions in the United States. Certain of the most important American in- dustries depend in part upon the export trade. A scarcity of labor in the United States would induce many American manufacturers to follow the example of their European com- petitors, who have found it more profitable to establish fac- tories in foreign countries than to export their products to those countries. It is learned from an official report of the Commercial Secretary of the British Embassy in Berlin, that arrangements have been in progress between American capi- talists and German corporations, looking toward the invest- ment of American capital in German industry. There are other reports to the same effect. Such an emigration of American capital would materially affect the export trade of Summary Review the United States and eventually cut off the avenues of em-- ployment for a number of American wage-earners. It is evident that while restriction of immigration can limit the supply of labor, It is powerless to prevent a corresponding limitation of the demand for labor. The true cause of the decline of real wages during the late war is to be found in the fact that advances in wages are the outcome of the slow process of. collective bargaining, with occasional industrial warfare, whereas the prices of commodi- ties are controlled by monopolistic combinations, which promptly shift every advance in wages to the consumer. Thus the rise of wages in one industry or occupation is, in effect, charged up to the working class as a whole. What is wanted in order to secure to the worker a real advance in wages is regulation of profits in the interest of the consumers, of whom the wage-earners are the most numerous element. Restriction of the supply of labor does not touch the problem of price control. Immigration laws can prevent the American capitalist from employing foreign labor in the United States. But he may find it as profitable to employ the same labor in Europe ;n the manufacture of goods for the world market. The reduction of the supply of labor will be neutralized by a reduction of the demand for labor in the United States. PART II. TOPICAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER I STATEMENT OF THE QUESTION A STUDY of the immigration question involves an ex- amination of every important phase of American eco- nomic, political, and social life. There is scarcely an ailment of our body politic that is not diagnosed in prose and in verse as the effect of unrestricted immigration. The immigrants are blamed for unemployment, female and child labor, the introduction of machinery, unsafe coal mines, lack of organization among wage-earners, congestion in great cities, industrial crises, inability to gain a controlling interest in stock corporations, J pauperism, crime, insanity, race suicide, gambling, the continental Sunday, parochial schools, atheism, political corruption, municipal misrule. The latest count in this long indictment is the McNamara conspiracy, which a noted sociologist has somehow connec- ted with unrestricted immigration. 2 Not only has "recent immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe" lowered the American standard of living, but it threatens to lower "the average stature of the American. "3 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 16, p. 655. * Prof. E. A. Ross, in The Survey, December 30, 1911, p. 1425. Robert Hunter: Poverty, p. 269. 40 Statement of the Question 41 It is conceded that in the past immigration has been a material factor in the economic development of the United States. It is claimed, however, that the new immigrant races are of a different social type lacking the sturdy quali- ties of the old immigration. * ' In the early years of immigra- tion, when it was difficult, if not actually dangerous, to come to the United States, there was a natural selection of the best and hardiest inhabitants of the old world, men willing to risk their all in going to a new country." x . The pioneers of those days were eager for an opportunity to develop the untouched resources of a new land and to advance the march of civilization into the wilderness. The new immigrant, on the contrary, is attracted by the glamor of the city. To be sure, a large percentage of the new immigration comes from the farming sections of Europe ; but brought up, as they are, amidst the congestion of the small agricultural towns of the old world, these new immigrants recoil at the isolation of the American farm and prefer to crowd in the congested districts of the large manu- facturing cities. The cure for the evils of immigration upon which all seem to be agreed is some method of selection which would admit all desirable immigrants and keep out the "undesirable." There is, however, no authoritative definition of a "de- sirable" and an "undesirable " immigrant. Mr. Prescdtt F. Hall, Secretary of the Immigration Restriction League, regards as "undesirable immigration" that " which .fe ig- norant of a trade," 2 while another writer maintains that the races having the highest percentages of unskilled laborers are the most desirable, because they do not com- pete with American mechanics, but men who are "skilled in tailoring, shoemaking, baking, or other trades which do not require much physical strength ... are undesirable immi- grants," because "they enter into direct competition with 1 John Mitchell : Organized Labor, p. 1 77. 'Prescott F. Hall: "Selection of Immigration." Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Science, July, 1904, P- i?5. & Immigration and Labor the American mechanic." 1 Again Mr. Hall would treat as "undesirable immigration" that "which is averse to country life and tends to congregate in the slums of large cities," though "if our recent immigrants were able and willing to go to the West and South, these States do not want them." 2 Along with the Southeastern European immigrant who is accordingly not wanted either in the large cities, or in the agricultural West and South, the same author would class as "undesirable" all immigration "which fails to assimilate in a reasonable time." 3 Prof. Mayo-Smith is more specific in his definition and favors the selection of immigrants with a view, among other things, to the preservation of the "social morality of the Puritans." 4 With respect to assimilation, conditions are said to have undergone a material change. The old immigrants, scat- tered amidst the native American population, were quickly assimilated. Moreover, they were practically all of Teuton and Celtic stock and came from countries with a represen- tative form of government. The recent immigrants, on the other hand, have had no training in self-government at home, and being herded together in foreign colonies, out of touch with native Americans, they are incapable of assimi- lation and present a growing danger to the integrity of American democratic institutions. 5 According to some students, this country is facing a new x Dr. Allan McLaughlin: "Distrust of the Immigrant." Popular Science Monthly, January, 1903, p. 232. 2 Prescott F. Hall, loc. cit., pp. 175, 179. * Ibid., p. 175. * Richmond Mayo-Smith: Emigration and Immigration, p. 5. sA writer, discussing the "perils" of "un-American immigration* in 1894, gave warning that "if foreign immigration continues at the present rate and such immigration continues to come from Middle, Southern, and Northeastern Europe, in 1900 the Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Saxon institutions will no longer J&e the dominant powers in moulding American life and legislation." Rena M. Atchison, Un- American Immigration: Its Present and Future Perils, p. 148. (Chicago 1894.) Statement of the Question 43 race problem, similar to the negro problem. In the opinion of a member of the Immigration Commission the Southern Italian is not "a white man," nor is the Syrian. 1 The presence of these races in large numbers among the working forces of our mines and mills has attached a social stigma to certain occupations; as a result of this race prejudice the native American workmen have withdrawn from those employments where they must work side by side with recent arrivals and overcrowd the less remunerative, but more respectable occupations. 2 Still the fact is that while the root of all evil is sought in the racial make-up of the new immigration, as contrasted with the old, every complaint against the immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe is but an echo of the com- plaints which were made at an earlier day against the then new immigration from Ireland, Germany, and even from England. As observed by the Industrial Commission a decade ago, "on the whole, it does not seem that the newer immigration offers any greater or more serious problems than the old, except in so far as they add to the total numbers . " 3 A retrospective view of immigration will show the problems presented by a polyglot population to be by no means peculiar to our own day. If "assimilation" is taken to mean the substitution of the English language in daily intercourse for the mother tongue of the immigrant, then a century of experience proves it to be an unattainable ideal. But, if "assimilation" means an understanding of 1 Hearings before the House Committee on Immigration and Natural- ization. 6ist Congress. Testimony of Hon. John L. Burnett, of Ala- bama, p. 407. In 1885, in reply to inquiries sent out by the Iowa Bureau of Labor Statistics, a laboring man complained that "the Bohemians . . . will get a job in preference to a white man." (VI. Biennial Report, Iowa Bureau of Labor Statistics, p. 189.) Since that time the Bohemians have been advanced in the publications of the Immigration Restriction League to a place among the "desirable" im- migrants from Northern and Western Europe. 2 Jenks and Lauck: The Immigration Problem, pp. 75-76- a Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 491. 44 Immigration and Labor American institutions, it will readily occur to the student that one of the standard works on the constitutional history of the United States was written in German by von Hoist, an alumnus of a Russian university, and another standard book on the organization of American political parties was written in French by Ostrogorsky, a Russian Jew. The politician who comes in closest personal contact with the mass of citizenship has long since adjusted himself to the conditions created by immigration and finds no difficulty in presenting the issues and the candidates of his party to a mixed constituency in a variety of languages. Moreover, a deeper insight into the social life of the immigrant will dis- cover powerful forces making for social assimilation, in those very institutions which are popularly frowned upon as tending to perpetuate the isolation of the foreigner from American influences. The newspaper printed in a foreign language is virtually a sign of Americanization; the Lithu- anian peasant at home had no newspaper in his own language; the demand for a newspaper has grown on American soil. That it apparently serves its purpose, is conceded by prominent advocates of restriction. 1 The theater where the immigrant sees a play produced in his mother tongue is likewise the outgrowth of the democratic spirit of American social life ; the theater in Eastern Europe caters only to the upper classes. The numerous foreign- speaking organizations owe their existence to the political freedom of the United States. It is through all these social agencies using his native tongue as a medium of communi- cation, that the immigrant who is not a scholar is enabled to partake of the advantages of American civilization. It is realized by the clear-sighted advocates of restriction that "too rnuch emphasis, in the discussion of immigration, within recent years, has been placed upon the social and political results of recent immigration. The problem at 1 "So large a number of periodicals are published in various foreign tongues that it is by no means essential that the immigrant read Eng- lish. " Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., p. 32. Statement of the Question 45 present is really fundamentally an industrial one." 1 The reason the appeals for restriction to-day find a more favor- able hearing than in the days of the Know-Nothing agita- tion, is the growth of organized labor, which demands restriction of immigration as an extension of the protective principle to the home market in which "hands" the laborer's only commodity are offered for sale. All doc- trinaire theories of a civic character are accepted by orga- nized labor in so far as they may be helpful in its campaign for restriction of immigration. The real attitude of orga- nized labor, however, is candidly stated in the testimony of Mr. Roe, representing the railroad brotherhoods, before the House Committee on Immigration and Naturaliza- tion: "Every foreign workman who comes into this country takes the place of some American workingman who wants higher wages and a higher standard of living than the foreigner." 2 All opposition to restriction of immigration is viewed with suspicion by organized labor, as emanating from the employ- ing class or from the steamship companies, which are hiding selfish interests under a cloak of humanitarianism. This view overlooks the millions of foreign-born wage-earners who are bound by family ties with millions of workers across the sea and want them to share in the opportunities which this country holds out to the immigrant for bettering his economic and social conditions. 3 Their appeal from the present-day policy of restriction to old American traditions springs from personal affection and friendship. It must be understood, however, that the United States no longer recognizes the Kantian "ideal demand of the new 1 Ibid., p. 197. a H. R. 6ist. Congress. Hearings before Committee on Immigra- tion and Naturalization, p. 254. s The claim of the pessimists, that the condition of the immigrant workman in the United States is to-day no better than in his native country (Robert Hunter: Poverty, p. 280), is refuted by the millions, of European workers who come to this country to stay and send for their relatives. 46 Immigration and Labor law of nations," x that the individual may have the freedom of the world to choose his domicil, regardless of state boun- daries. The enactment of the Chinese exclusion law signa- lized a reversion of the United States to the old doctrine of sovereignty, which invests the state with the absolute right to exclude aliens from its territory. In opposition to the cosmopolitan theory underlying the free immigration policy of the past, the policy of restriction has elaborated its own social philosophy in the following words of Mr. John Mitchell: To a large extent the progress of nations can best be secured by the policy of seclusion and isolation. By means of barriers which regulate, but do not prohibit, immigration, the various countries of Europe and America can individually work out their salvation, and a permanent increase in the efficiency and remuneration of the workers of the world can thus be obtained. By the maintenance of these barriers the best workingmen in each country can rise to the top, and the great mass of the workingmen can secure a larger share of the wealth produced. 2 It goes without saying that this theory of progress can lay no claim to originality, "the policy of seclusion and isolation" having been consistently followed for many centuries by China. Without venturing, however, into the realm of sociologi- cal speculation, and allowing that if ' ' every foreign work- man who comes into this country takes the place of some American workingman" immigration ought to be pro- hibited, the unprejudiced student of the immigration ques- tion will demand proof that the premises are true. When a million workers are reported to be out of employment and an equal number of immigrants are shown to have been admitted during the same year, the man in the street is apt to jump to the conclusion that the new arrivals have dis- 1 J. C. Bluntschli: Die Bedeutung und die Fortschritte des modern en Volkerrechts, p. 36. _ a John Mitchell: Organized Labor, p. 181. It is stated on p. viii of the book that it has been written in co-operation with Dr. Walter E. Weyl. Statement of the Question 47 placed the native workmen or the older immigrants. On closer scrutiny, however, this superficial conclusion may prove wholly unwarranted. To take but one illustration, the presence of a few thousand unemployed sailors in Buf- falo during the winter months is no proof of an oversupply of sailors during the navigation season or of an overstocked labor market in general. The emigration of all Slav and Italian surface laborers employed during the summer in the iron mines of the Lake Superior region would not create a single job for the unemployed sailors in the winter. On the contrary, the reduction of the working force in the mines during the season which is most favorable for their operation would have the effect of reducing the volume of iron ore carried on the lakes, in consequence of which a number of sailors could be dispensed with in the summer. It is quite obvious that the effects, if any, of immigration upon unem- ployment cannot be determined by deductive reasoning. The same is true of the standard of living, etc. In order to bring to light all the facts respecting immigra' tion, a commission was created in 1907 by an act of Con' gress. The results of the Commission's investigations will next be considered. CHAPTER II THE REPORT OF THE IMMIGRATION COMMISSION THE most valuable contribution of the Immigration Commission to the discussion of immigration is the conclusion that it should be considered "primarily as an economic problem. ' ' x This statement of the question takes it out of the domain of conflicting, more or less specula- tive, social theories and permits of its consideration on the solid basis of measurable economic realities. Of the forty-two volumes of the Commission's report, thirty-one contain primary facts directly or indirectly related to the economic aspects of immigration. 2 The Commission has unanimously recommended restric- tion of immigration, the only dissenting opinion being con- fined to methods of restriction. There are few people who will go beyond the conclusions of the Commission and undertake the task of examining the evidence, presumably stored up in its voluminous report. The lay public will assume that the unanimous conclusions were reached after mature deliberation over the evidence collected by the Commission. An illuminating sidelight upon the supposed connection between its recommendations and its statistics is thrown by ex-Congressman William S. Bennet's dissenting opinion, which contains the statement that the report of the Commission was finally adopted "within a half hour of the 1 -Reports of the Immigration Commission,_yol. I, p. 25. 8 Volumes 3, 4, 6-28, 34, 35, 37, and 40. The remaining portion of the report deals with ethnography, education, legislation, etc., and two of the volumes are summaries of the whole. 48 Report of the Immigration Commission 49 time" when, under the law, it had to be filed, which left "no time for the preparation of an elaborate dissent." It is legitimate to question under the circumstances whether the members of the Commission had the opportunity, amidst their manifold duties, to examine the manuscript of the forty volumes, which did not leave the printing office until more than a year after the Commission had ceased to exist. Apparently, they had before them merely the summary sub- mitted for the Commission's approval by its experts. The unanimity of the Commission thus invests its conclusions with no other authority than the scientific weight of the statistical and descriptive reports of its experts. The most important part of the reports, viz. " Immigrants in Indus- tries" (vols. 6-25), "was prepared under the direction of the Commission" by one expert, Prof. W. Jett Lauck (of course, with the assistance of a staff of field agents and clerks). The student is, therefore, free to judge the reports of the Commission by the same canons as other official statistical publications. The Commission finds: That the numbers of recent immigrants "are so great and the influx is so continuous that even with the remarkable expansion of industry during the past few years there has been created an oversupply of unskilled labor, and in some of the industries this is reflected in a curtailed number of working days and a consequent yearly income among the unskilled workers which is very much less than is indicated by the daily wage rates paid." That the standard of living of "the majority of the employees . . . is so far below that of the native American or older immigrant workman that it is impossible for the latter to successfully compete with them." That "they are content to accept wages and conditions which the native American and immigrants of the older class had come to regard as unsatisfactory . . . and as a result that class of employees was gradually replaced." That the new immigrants have in some degree "lowered the American standard of living." 50 Immigration and Labor That a "characteristic of the new immigrants is the impossibility of successfully organizing them into labor unions. Several attempts at organization were made, but the constant influx of immigrants to whom prevailing con- ditions seemed unusually favorable contributed to the fail- ure to organize." That "the competition of these immigrants . . . has kept conditions in the semi-skilled and unskilled occupations from advancing. ' ' x Every one of the preceding conclusions involved a com- parison of the present conditions with the past. Still it is only as a rare exception that fragments of statistical infor- mation relating to the earlier period of American industrial history can be found in the numerous volumes of the reports of the Immigration Commission. No attempt has been made to utilize the vast statistical material collected by the State bureaus of labor statistics since the establishment of the Massachusetts Bureau in 1 869. This is very much to be regretted. There is no other nation in the world that ex- pends so much for the collection of statistical data and so little for their analysis as the United States. An index prepared by the United States Bureau of Labor to the publications of the State labor bureaus up to 1902 fills a volume. The data contained in these publications were collected at great cost during a period of years, but were for the most part pub- lished in an undigested form. This defect is the result of the prevailing policy of official statistical institutions to elimi- nate as far as practicable all interpretations of their statis- tics in order to escape the suspicion of partisanship. A Congressional commission, however, is free from such limi- tations, its very purpose being to draw conclusions and make recommendations which are of necessity open to controversy. A perusal of the single volume devoted to immigration in the report of President McKinley's Indus- trial Commission shows what a storehouse of original data is available at small cost in the files of official publications ' x Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, pp. 38, 39. Report of the Immigration Commission 51 of States and municipalities. The Immigration Com- mission with its vastly greater resources had the oppor- tunity to make a contribution of inestimable value to the study of the economic and social conditions of the American people at the period of the greatest migration in the history of the world. Unfortunately the Commission expended all its efforts in search for new material, with the result, as candidly admitted by Prof. H. Parker Willis, "the editorial adviser" in the final preparation of its re- port, that the thirty-one volumes have added a fresh stock of ill-digested statistics to that previously accumu- lated. 1 Of what value are the tables showing the rate of unem- ployment of a limited number of selected families when the censuses of 1890 and 1900 have collected and published such data for all bread-winners in the United States? The fact that the wage-earners in some industries were unemployed some part of the year covered by the Com- mission is alone insufficient to support the conclusion that the number of working days has been "curtailed," without a comparison of the number of working days in the same industries for a series of years. "Racial displacement" prominently figures in the tables of contents of every vol- ume and in the subheads of every chapter dealing with the condition in the manufacturing and mining industries, but an inspection of the statistical tables discloses no evidence of actual ' ' displacement. ' ' One example may serve as an illustration. The changes in the population of Birmingham, Alabama, have been the subject of the following commentary: 1 "With so much actually collected in the way of detailed data, and with but scant time in which to summarize these data, lacking, more- over, a sufficient number of trained writers and statisticians to study the information acquired and to set it down with a due proportion of properly guarded inferences, it is a fact that much of the Commission's information is still undigested, and is presented in a form which affords no more than a foundation for the work of future inquirers. " H. Parker Willis in The Survey of January 7, 1911, p. 57 1 - 52 Immigration and Labor It is even more significant, however, that with the exception of the Welsh and Norwegians there was a falling off in numbers from the coun- tries of Great Britain and Northern Europe in 1900 as contrasted with 1890, the increase in the foreign-born population during the ten years 1890-1900 practically all arising from the arrival of races from Southern and Eastern Europe. 1 The numbers which have given occasion to the preceding remarks were as follows: Place of birth 1890 igoo. England. .. 258 233 Germany . . 450 446 Ireland.... 245 218 Scotland. . . 53 52 Sweden. . . . 49 16 It will be observed that the total "falling off in numbers" amounted to 33 Swedes, 27 Irish, 25 English, 4 Germans, and I Scotch in all, 90 persons in ten years. At the same time the native-born population increased by as many as 12,113 persons, while the total increase "from the arrival of races from Southern and Eastern Europe " was less than 2 14 persons. Why should the loss of the 90 natives of Great Britain and Northern Europe be interpreted as their dis- placement by arrivals from Southern and Eastern Europe rather than by native Americans? Moreover, the rate of mortality among those nationalities, except the Swedes, must have reduced their numbers by at least one sixth in ten years, which is more than twice their actual falling-off and suggests that there must have been some increase by immi- gration from the same sources. So the actual falling-off was confined to the Swedes, who if all alive were leaving Birmingham at the rate of three individuals per year. Was the annual loss of three Swedes "significant" enough for a city whose population increased 50 per cent from 1890 to 1900 to be noted as evidence of "racial displacement"? "The impossibility of successfully organizing" the new immigrants "into labor unions" cannot be proved without 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, p. 159. Report of the Immigration Commission 53 statistics of union membership. The Commission has com- piled no statistical table showing the growth of labor unions in various trades during the period of recent immigration. The data collected by the Commission as a part of its study of households are too meager and fragmentary to be of any value. The following table and commentary are a fair specimen of the Commission's trade-union. statistics: 1 TABLE 233. AFFILIATION WITH TRADE-UNIONS OF MALES 21 YEARS OF AGE OR OVER WHO ARE WORKING FOR WAGES, BY GENERAL NATIVITY AND RACE OF INDIVIDUAL. (Study of households.) Number Affiliated with trade-unions General nativity and race of individual complete data Number Per cent Native-born of native father white Native-born of foreign father, by race of father: 47 I O.O (a* j (a) Irish I (a) Polish 2 (a) Foreign-born: Croatian 24.O 2 .8 I 1-9 Irish II (<0 Polish 64 .0 Slovenian I (a) ' Total 424 I .7 Total native-born of foreign father Total native-born . ...... 7 54 w .0 Total foreign-born. 170 3 .8 (a) Not computed, owing to small number involved. The above table disposes the significant fact that an exceedingly small proportion of employees in Kansas City of foreign birth, and none of native birth, are affiliated with labor organizat/Vni. Ibid., vol. 13, p. 300. 54 Immigration and Labor The fact that the field agents of the Commission in a study of households, not of trade-unions happened to come across three trade-unionists in a city of the size of Kansas City, is considered sufficient to justify the conclusion that "an exceedingly small proportion of employees in Kansas City . . . are affiliated with trade-unions "! Another table brings out the "affiliation with trade-unions" of one South Italian wage-earner among 668 householders duly "classified by nativity and race of individual." * When a single trade-unionist in an unorganized mill town is enlarged into an "exhibit by general nativity and race of individual," one cannot help wondering that the economic data of the Commission have been compressed within the small compass of thirty-one volumes. Coming to the standard of living, it is clearly insufficient to compare the sections inhabited by English-speaking skilled mechanics and their families with the settlements of the unskilled Slav laborers, with a view to showing that the former present a better appearance than the latter. The housing conditions of the new immigrants should be com- pared with those of the Irish and German unskilled laborers a generation ago, in order to support the conclusion that the former have "introduced a lower standard." The statistics of earnings classified by race and nativity are spread over hundreds of tables, yet they are vitiated by the absence of a classification by occupations. The only con- clusion that can be drawn from these statistics is that the weekly or annual earnings of the new immigrants are, as a rule, lower than those of the native wage-earners or the older immigrants. But when this information is collated with the fact that the new immigrants are mostly employed in unskilled occupations, while the native Americans and for- eign-born employees of the older class have risen on the scale 1 Ibid., vol. 8, p. 390, Table 286. A similar table comprising two Polish trade-unionists among 441 heads of households will be found in the same volume on p. 765, Table 515, and another in vol. n, p. 701, Table 38. Report of the Immigration Commission 55 of occupations, it is readily seen that the hundreds of tables show nothing beyond the fact that supervisory positions and skilled trades are more remunerative than unskilled labor. It was hardly necessary to expend much time and labor in order to establish this fact which is a matter of common knowledge. To justify the conclusions of the Commission, proof was wanted that the rates of wages of the new immigrants in specified occupations were lower than those paid to native workmen in the same occupations and in the same localities. No such proof was produced ; on the contrary, the Commission found that, as a matter of fact, the new immigrants ' ' were not, as a rule, engaged at lower wages than had been paid to the older workmen for the same class of labor/' * The numerous tables showing variations in weekly earnings by race are therefore meaningless. The popular prejudice against the new immigrant races justified an unbiased comparative study of their social and economic conditions in the United States 2 . Unfortunately the experts and investigators of the Commission were them- selves so completely under the sway of the popular senti- ment that they perceived the effect of race differences even in small variations of the number of mine accidents, where the element of chance called for the exercise of extreme caution in drawing conclusions. The following example is typical of the generalizations which abound in the reports of the Commission. In the year 1907 there were 75 fatal and non-fatal accidents among the Lithuanians and 139 among the Poles employed by one anthracite coal company. As the Lithuanians were somewhat more numerous than the Poles, the following conclusion is drawn in the report: The differences between the Lithuanian and Polish figures, after 1 Reports, vol. I, p. 38. a "In studying the immigration situation in Europe the Commission was not unmindful of the fact that the widespread apprehension in the United States relative to immigration is chiefly due to this change in the character of the movement of population from Europe in recent years. " Ibid., vol. 4, P- I2 - 56 Immigration and Labor making due allowance for error in both cases, is still so great that it gives ground for the inference that here a real race difference is exposed. When it is remembered in how many other instances in this report tables have shown a superiority of the Lithuanians over the Poles, the conclusion gathers strength that the former show greater skill and care- fulness in their work. 1 In Lawrence, Massachusetts, however, "the Lithuanians are said to resemble the Poles in their industrial character- istics, but are thought to be less intelligent or at any rate more illiterate." 2 The average percentage of illiteracy among the Lithuanian immigrants admitted from 1899 to 1910 was 48.9 per cent and amongr the Polish immigrants admitted during the same period 35.4 per cent. 3 These averages are derived from the records of over a million individuals of both nationalities, whereas "the superiority of the Lithu- anians over the Poles'* is deduced from 214 accidents that occurred in one year in the mines of one company. As far as the statistics of the Commission permit to judge jf the antecedents of the Lithuanian and Polish anthra- ite coal workers in their native countries, it appears that aone of them had worked in mines before coming to the United States; 96 per cent of the Lithuanians and 86 per lent of the Poles from whom information was received had been peasants (farmers and farm laborers) in their home countries, the proportion of farmers and farmers' sons being somewhat higher among the Poles than among the Lithuanians, viz., 70 per cent and 60 per cent, respectively, of the total number reported for each race. 4 To judge by the historical experiences of the two races, there is no warrant whatsoever for rating the mass of the Poles below the mass of the Lithuanians. For centuries they have been close neighbors. Since the organic union of Poland and Lithuania in 1386, Polish civilization was dominant in Lithuania. The ruling classes, the landed nobility and the clergy were thoroughly Polonized. Since 1 Reports, vol. 16, p. 667 'Ibid., vol. 10, p. 772. 3 Ibid., vol. I, p. 99. Table II. *Ibid., vol. 16, p. 596, Table 9. Report of the Immigration Commission 57 the policy of Russianization was inaugurated in Poland and Lithuania fifty years ago, the Lithuanians have been at a disadvantage compared with the Poles; the Lithuanian language was barred from the public schools; they were denied the right to have a press in their own language, while the mass of the Lithuanian people do not understand the Russian language. The Immigration Commission has discovered no anthro- pological evidence that would sustain the hypothesis of the superiority of the Lithuanian race, unless the difference of 64 accidents be accepted as such evidence. Yet it appears from the same accident statistics that the native Americans also contributed more than their share of accident victims, whereas the Irish exhibited an exceptionally low accident rate. This variation, however, must not be construed to show a superiority of the Irish over the native Americans, because "for the accident report the State mine inspector generally has to get the nationality from others, usually friends of the victim or his boss," and the informa- tion is often erroneous. "Probably the same source of error accounts for some of the Polish accident excess." 1 Still, if not all of the 64 accidents then some of them are deemed sufficient to place the Poles below the Lithuanians on the sliding scale of foreign races. It would seem as if the investigation of the Immigration Commission proceeded upon the supposition that immigrant races represented separate zoological species. Thus we find the following under the head "diseases peculiar to immigrant races": The testimony of the physicians and hospital authorities is to the effect that apparently (sic/) there are no diseases peculiar to any one single race. The chief diseases among the aliens are the following: (a) Rheumatism; (b) heart diseases; (c) typhoid fever; (d) pneumonia this is one of the diseases most common to the foreign population, but they seem no more subject to it than the natives. 9 Thus it has been officially established that disease 1 Reports, vol. 1 6, p. 667. *Ibid., vol. 8, p. 433- Immigration and Labor " apparently " makes no distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, "the aliens" being subject, alike with native-born and naturalized citizens, to rheumatism and pneumonia. The habits of the new species are described in the language of the naturalist. We learn, e. g., that among the Bulgarians beef "is usualy cooked as a stew with veg- etables and eaten with bread. They also consume all forms of green vegetables in season. . . . The usual drinks are coffee and beer. Many drink hot milk in the morning." ' The adoption of the "race" idea as a basis for classification has inevitably led to the splitting up of all statistical data into minute groups unfit for any generalizations. The Commission has nevertheless systematically reduced all such data to percentages, which are used for comparison among races. It is an elementary rule in statistics that averages and percentages may be used for generalizations only when derived from large numbers, the reason being that where the number of observed cases is small personal characteristics or casual circumstances may affect the results. How deceptive percentage may be when derived from insufficient numbers, is illustrated by the following table compiled from the Commission's statistics, showing the "per cent of foreign-born employees (in the clothing factories investigated) who speak English, by sex, years in the United States, and race." 3 TABLE i. PER CENT WHO SPEAK ENGLISH, BY YEARS, IN THE UNITED STATES Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 years or over Total Male Bohemian and Moravian Polish 22.5 24.8 18.1 19.4 45-0 62.4 sf-5 63-0 75.0 83-2 88.0 89.4 56.0 51-1 54-8 49-9 Female Bohemian and Moravian. . . . Polish 1 Reports, vol. 9, p. 82. 3 Ibid., vol. II, p. 363, Table 95, Report of the Immigration Commission 59 The significance of the preceding table is in the fact that the Bohemians and Moravians are classed by the Immigration Restriction League among "desirable" immigrants, where- as the Poles belong to the "undesirable aliens from Eastern Europe." A comparison of the figures in the first three columns shows, however, that in each group classified according to length of residence in the United States the Poles show a higher percentage of males, as well as females, able to speak English, than the Bohemians. And yet when the totals are compared for both nationalities, irrespective of length of residence in the United States, it appears that the Bohemians exhibit a larger percentage of persons of either sex able to speak English, than the Poles. The reason for this arithmetical aberration is disclosed only in another part of the volume, where the number of persons in each of the preceding groups is given. It appears that about one-half of all Poles had resided in the United States less than five years and accordingly exhibited a small per- centage of persons able to speak English, whereas three fourths of all males and two thirds of all females of Bohemian nationality had resided in the United States over five years and had had more time to learn English. 1 1 The following are the numbers relating to the two rationalities: Male Bohemian and Moravian . . Polish Number reporting complete data Years in the United States Under 5 5 top I o or over Num- ber Number who speak English Num- ber Number who speak English Num- ber Number who speak English 219 153 117 127 - 532 667 347 43i 129 3 02 127 216 29 75 23 42 III 181 87 73 50 "3 50 46 292 184 133 142 Female Bohemian anc Moravian. . Polish 1 Reports, vol. 11, pp. 54<>. 54* Table 53< 60 Immigration and Labor The numbers reported permit of no conclusion beyond the bare fact that the Bohemians are an older immigrant race than the Poles, yet the total percentages tend to create the wholly unjustified impression that the Poles are less capable of " assimilation " than the Bohemians. 1 The defects of the plan and statistical method of the Commission render the bulk of its report on Immigrants in Industries valueless or misleading. 1 The reports of the Immigration Commission abound with such comparative percentages. A few samples only can be quoted in these pages. To judge by percentages, the migratory spirit reaches its extreme height 60.0 per cent among the Greeks employed in the packing industry after they have been in the United States over ten years. On closer examination it appears, however, that there were five Greeks all told who had been in the United States more than ten years, and of their number three had visited abroad. (Reports, vol. 13, p. 151, Table 105.) In another place the following comment is made: "The employment of the wife or keeping boarders or lodgers is less frequent among the native-born of foreign father. " This conclusion is derived from the reports on just four families whose heads are native-born ol foreign father. (Ibid., voL 1 1 , p. 3 1 1 .) CHAPTER III OLD AND NEW IMMIGRATION IT has come to be accepted as an unquestionable truth so often has it been repeated that the type of the old immigrant was superior to the recent immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe : Fifty, even thirty years ago, [said Gen. F. A. Walker in 1896], there was a rightful presumption regarding the average immigrant, that he was among the most enterprising, thrifty, alert, adventurous, and courageous of the community from which he came. It required no small energy, prudence, forethought, and pains to conduct the inquiries relating to his migration, to accumulate the necessary means, and to find his way across the Atlantic. x The immigrants of those happy days did not come because they were assisted by others, they did not come because some one paid their passage to get them out of the old coun- try, but they came because they wanted to be free. . . . They came not at the behest of the agents of the steamship lines or the agent of the large American industries, sent over to buy labor as by auction, in the market. ... No; they came at their own behest, and did not all settle down in the centers of American life to congest it, but struck out into the prairies and forest to build homes for themselves and families. 8 "Those were skilled artisans or progressive farmers of the thrifty, self-reliant type." 3 1 Francis A. Walker: Discussions in Economics and Statistics, p. 446. 3 Statement of Rev. M. D. Lichliter, chaplain of the Junior Order American Mechanics before the House Committee on Immigration an Naturalization, Sixty first Congress. Hearings, p. 49 * 3 Frank Tracy Carlton: The History and Problems of Organized Labor, p. 328. 61 62 Immigration and Labor It is the old story of the Golden Age in a modern version. The cold facts of history, however, do not bear out this popular myth. The great majority of immigrants to this country were so poor that they could not buy their passage, and in order to meet the obligations incurred by them for passage money and other advances, they were sold, after their arrival, into temporary servitude. . . . The prepayment of the passage was the exception, and its subsequent discharge by compul- sory labor the rule. 1 The ship owners and ship merchants derived enormous profits from the sale of bodies of immigrants, as they charged very high rates for the passage, to which they added a heavy percentage often more than a hundred per cent for their risks. But the immi- grants suffered bitterly from this traffic in human flesh. Old people, widows, and cripples would not sell well, while healthy parents with healthy children and young people of both sexes always found a ready market. If the parents were too old to work, their children had to serve so much longer to make up the difference. When one or both parents died on the voyage, their children had to serve for them. The expenses of the whole family were summed up and charged upon the survivor or survivors. Adults had to serve from three to six years; children from ten to fifteen years, till they became of age; smaller children were, without charge, surrendered to masters, who had to raise and board them. As all servants signed indentures, they were called ' ' indentured servants. " Whenever a vessel arrived at Philadel- phia or New York its passengers were offered at public sale. The ship was the market-place, and the servants were struck off to the highest bidder. The country people either came themselves or sent agents or friends to procure what they wanted, be it a girl, or a "likely boy, or an old housekeeper, or a whole family. . . . Parents sold their children in order to remain free themselves. When a young man or girl had an opportunity to get married they had to pay their master five or six pounds for each year they had to serve. Yet a steerage passage never cost more than ten pounds. ... If the master did not want to keep his servant he could sell him for the unexpired time of his term of servitude. a "The newspapers of the time regularly contain advertise- 1 Prof. Commons estimates that probably one half of all the immigrants of the colonial period landed as indentured servants. A. M. Simons: Social Forces in American History, p. 19. a From a paper read before the American Social Science Association in New York City, in 1869, by State Commissioner of Immigration, Friedrich Kapp. X VI. Annual Report of the New York Bureau of Labor Statistics, pp. 964-965. Old and New Immigration 63 ments of the arrival of ships with 'indentured servants' to be sold. In case no buyers came to the ship the pas- sengers were sold to agents, who chained them together and peddled them through the towns and villages." 1 * So great then was the poverty of the early immigrants that for the sum of ten pounds they were willing to sell themselves into peonage. The last sales of immigrants are reported in 1819 in Philadelphia. 2 Nearly a century ago, the managers of the Society for the Prevention of Pauperism in the City of New York spoke of the immigrants "in the language of astonishment and apprehension": Through this inlet pauperism threatens us with the most overwhelm- ing consequences. . . . The present state of Europe contributes in a thousand ways to foster unceasing immigration to the United States. . . An almost innumerable population beyond the ocean is out of employment. . . . This country is the resort of vast numbers of these needy and wretched beings. . . . They are frequently found destitute in our streets, they seek employment at our doors; they are found in our almshouses and in our hospitals; they are found at the bar of our criminal tribunals, in our bridewell, our penitentiary, and our State prison, and we lament to say that they are too often led by want, by vice, and by habit to form a phalanx of plunder and depredations, rendering our city more liable to increase of crimes and our houses of correction more crowded with convicts and felons. 3 Eighteen years later the Mayor of New York City in a communication to the City Council complained that the streets were "filled with wandering crowds" of immigrants "clustering in our city, unacquainted with our climate, without employment, without friends, not speaking our language, and without any dependence for food, or raiment, or fireside, certain of nothing but hardship and a grave." 4 1 Simons, loc. cit., p. 19. a Kapp, loc. cit., p. 965. 3 Second Annual Report of the Managers of the Society for the Pre- vention of Pauperism in the City of New York, 1819. Quoted from the Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 449- 4 H. R., 61 st Congress. Hearings before Committee on Immigration, P- 369. 64 Immigration and Labor This was the period when, according to Gen. F. A. Walker, the average immigrant was "enterprising, thrifty, ,'tlert, adventurous, and courageous." A contemporary writer anticipated General Walker's parallel between the old and the new immigration in almost identical language.' 1 A generation later it is again reported that "the poor and She productive classes of Europe, by hundreds of thousands, have been, and are now coming to our shores, with fixed habits and modes of life. These now constitute, mainly, the army of our unskilled laborers, are ignorant and de- graded, pitifully so." 2 Regarding the standard of living of the Irish peasantry at the beginning of the Irish exodus to America, when, according to General Walker's "rightful presumption," the average immigrant was thrifty and had accumulated the necessary means to pay his way, we have the following description from the same authority: The conditions under which they had been born and brought up were generally of the most squalid and degrading character. Their wretched hovels, thatched with rotting straw, scantily furnished with light, hardly ventilated at all, frequently with no floor but the clay on which they were built, were crowded beyond the bounds of comfort, health, or, as it would seem to us, of simple social decency; their beds were heaps of straw or rags; their food consisted mainly of buttermilk and potatoes, often of the worst, and commonly inadequate in amount ; their clothing was scanty and shabby. * 1 " Then our accessions of immigration were real accessions of strength from the ranks of the learned and the good, from enlightened mechanic and artisan and intelligent husbandman. Now, immigration is the accession of weakness, from the ignorant and vicious, or the priest- ridden slaves of Ireland and Germany, or the outcast tenants of the poorhouses and prisons of Europe." From a paper entitled "Imminent Dangers to the Institutions of the United States through Foreign Immigration," etc., by S. F. B. Morse, 1835. H. R. Sixty-first Con- gress. Hearings before the Committee on Immigration, p. 327. 2 Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor, 1869-1870, p. 88. y Walker, loc. cit., p. 451. The following is quoted elsewhere by the game author from the report of Earl Devon's Commission on Irish Poverty in the 40*3: " In many districts, their daily food is the potato; Old and New Immigration 65 Congestion was a common evil in those days, as it is to-day, and the reason for it was sought in the fact that the Irish immigrant, born in a cabin or a garret, had been used to crowding at home. 1 The New York Weekly Tribune of May 2, 1846, discussing a strike of Irish laborers in Brooklyn, said that their earnings were hardly sufficient to pay the rent of a decent tenement, so "they were allowed to build miserable shanties on ground allotted them by the contractors on the plot occupied by them in performing the work." 2 A quarter of a century later the dwellings of the Irish immigrants in Boston were officially charac- terized as "sickening kennels. " 3 Says Dr. Kate H. Claghorn, comparing the old immigration with the new: "No account of filth in daily surroundings among 4Htai and can outmatch the pictures drawn by observers of the habits of immigrant Irish and even Germans." 4 The living conditions in an Irish district in 1864 were thus described by a city inspector: The tenants seem to wholly disregard personal cleanliness, if not the very first principles of decency, their general appearance and actions corresponding with their wretched abodes. This indifference to per- sonal and domiciliary cleanliness is doubtless acquired from a long their only beverage water; their cabins are seldom a protection against the weather; a bed or a blanket is a rare luxury; and, in nearly all, their pig and manure heap constitute their only property./" Francis A. Walker: t Political Economy, pp. 313-314. "In the 40*8, at the time of the potato famine in Ireland, many of the thousands who came to this country were in serious danger of absolute starvation if they remained at home. Practically none of our immigrants of the present day are in such a con- dition." Jenks and Lauck: The Immigration Problem, p. 12. 1 A contemporary writer had "seen in Ireland a horse, two cows, two goats, grandmother, father and mother, brother and sisters, an infant in a cradle, all in one apartment. "Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 459. 2 Documentary History of American Industrial Society, vol. viii., pp. 225-226. 3 Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor, 1869-70, p. 88. Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 491. 66 Immigration and Labor familiarity with the loathsome surroundings, wholly at variance with all moral or social improvements. 1 A gloomy picture of the moral effects of bad housing conditions in the foreign sections of New York City in 1878, when the immigrants were only Irish and Germans, was drawn in a report of the Association for the Improvement of the Condition of the Poor: In many quarters of the city family life and the feeling of home are almost unknown; people live in great caravansaries, which are hot and stifling in summer, disagreeable in winter, and where children associate together in the worst way. In many rooms privacy and purity are unattainable, and young girls grow up accustomed to immodesty from ^flipAM^ y ea] )M4MN herd together in gangs, and learn the practices of crime and vice' before they are out of childhood. Even the laborers' families who occupy separate rooms in these buildings have no sense of home. 3 Dr. Griscom, as early as 1842, had called attention to the "depraved effects which such modes of life exert upon the moral feelings and habits"; and the city inspector in 1851 remarks that " these over- populated houses are generally, if not always, seminaries of filthiness, indecency, and lawlessness."* Dr. Claghorn concludes her review of the housing con- ditions of the former generations of immigrants with the following remarks: ' The newer immigrants arrive here at no lower social level, to say the least, than did their predecessors. Their habits of life, their general morality and intelligence can not be called decidedly inferior. . . . The Italian ragpicker was astonishingly like his German predecessor, and the Italian laborer is of quite as high a type as the Irish laborer of a generation ago. In some cases the newer immigrants have brought about positive improvements in the quarters they have entered. Whole blocks have been transferred from nests of pauperism and vice into quiet industrial neighborhoods by the incoming of Italians and Hebrews. Throughout the nineteenth century relief against city Report of the Industrial Commission, p. 456. a Ibid., p. 459. * Loc. cit.. p. 458. * Loc. cit. t p. 491. Old and New Immigration 67 poverty was sought in directing the current of immigration to the farm. As early as 1 8 1 7, ' * the same anxiety was felt that is felt to-day to get the immigrant out of the 'crowded' cities into the country beyond." 1 In 1819, the managers of the Society for the Prevention of Pauperism of the City of New York favored the plan of establishing "communica- tion . . . with our great farmers and landholders in the in- terior" with a view to provide "ways and means ... for the transportation of able-bodied foreigners into the in- terior," where labor could be provided for them "upon the soiL" 2 Forty years later the Association for the Improve- ment of the Condition of the Poor complained of the Irish immigrants that "they had an utter distaste for felling forests and turning up the prairies fgf ' Lhemselv^^'JMifey preferred to stay where another race would furnish them with food, clothing, and labor, and hence were mostly found loitering on the lines of the public works, in villages, and in the worst portions of the large cities where they competed ^vith negroes ... for the most degrading employments."^ * The old immigrants, like those of the present generation, were mostly unskilled laborers and farm hands, as will appear from an analysis of Table 2 next following. 4 TABLE 2. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF IMMIGRANTS BY OCCUPATIONS: I86I-I9IO. Occupation 1861- 1870 1871- 1880 1881- 1890 1891- 1900 1901- 1910 Professional. 0.8 1.4 I.I 0.9 1-5 Skilled. 24.0 23.1 20.4 20.1 20.2 17.6 18.2 14.0 II- 4 24-3 Unskilled laborers . . . 4.2.4 41.9 50.2 47.0 34-8 Servants 7.2 7-7 9-4 i5-i 14.1 All other occupations 8.0 7-7 9-4 5-5 5-i Total IOO.O IOO.O IOO.O IOO.O IOO.O 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, p. 449 3 Loc - cit "> P* 4 62 - tReportofthe A. I. C. P., 1860, p. 50- Quoted from Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 462. peachable evidence to the same effect in the report of the Bureau of Labor, to which reference has been made above. The Bureau's investigator examined the books of a number of employment agencies for 1906 and found that they had been unable to supply more than a fraction of their orders for help. 3 1 Frank J. Sheridan: " Italian, Slavic, and Hungarian Unskilled Im- migrant Laborers in the United States." Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 72, pp. 424-425- a Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit. t pp. 17, 140. a "A personal examination of the books of record of another agency, covering a period of eight months, from April I to November 30, 1906, showed that 165 employers in the States of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Virginia made application for 8668 Italian laborers from this one agency. The agency supplied fewer than f 500. Another agency, where no fees were charged, had applications Immigration and Labor Doubtless, demand and supply in the labor market are fluctuating. During the twenty-year period under con- sideration, this country has gone through two industrial crises, when great numbers of wage-earners were suddenly thrown out of employment. The question is, what, if any, is the interdependence between the vicissitudes of the labor market and immigration? The Industrial Commission, in 1901, from a comparative study of the number of immigrants and price index numbers .for a period of sixty years, arrived at the conclusion that ''"immigration follows business conditions in obedience to the opportunities for employment : In times of business ex- pansion, when capital is seeking investment and the re- sources of the country are being eagerly developed . . . immigrants enter in increasing numbers to take a share of the increasing wages and employment, but in times of business depression their numbers decline. " x The report of the Industrial Commission appeared after a decade of declining immigration. Has the unprecedented immigration of recent years changed its relation to business conditions in this country? A comparative view of the fluctuations of business and immigration for the past thirty years, since the tide has set in from Eastern and Southern Europe, can be gained from a glance at Diagram I. 2 It will be observed that the curves representing the production of coal, the volume of railway freight, bank clearings, and immigration run in in seven months for 37,058, and could supply but 3705 newly arrived Italian immigrants. One effect of the scarcity is reported by an Italian agency as follows: " ' Since about July, 1906, on account of the great scarcity, employers pay from $3.00 to $5.00 per man for common laborers. Not for twenty- two years have there been such high fees offered. Since the demand set in the laborer pays no fees.' " (Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 72, pp. 424-425-) 1 Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., pp. 308, 309. See also chart opposite p. 305. 3 Based uoon the figures of the Statistical Abstract of the United States. DIAGRAM I. IMMIORANT5 ARRIVED. TENS OF THOUSANDS PRODUCTION OF COAL, luwr - Z.000.000 LONG TONS LWAY FREIGHT. BILLIONS OF (SHORT) TON HUES .US BANK CLEARINGS: BILLIONS OF DOLLARS COMMERCIAL FAILURES. IU 500,000 "\ / *>/ r 1 Ly I I. Immigration and business conditions, 1880-1910. Immigration and Labor harmony. On the other hand, the decrease of immigration from 1880 to 1899 runs almost parallel with the increase of commercial failures, and vice versa. During the following years of prosperity the amount of commercial failures showed little variation, and the curve of immigration was following the lines of industrial expansion. The years since the last panic again show a parallelism between the decline of immigration and the increase of failures, on the one hand, ajid industrial activity, on the other. It must be borne in mind that the immigration figures represent gross additions to the population of the United States. Attention has frequently been called, however, to the vast disparity between the increase of the foreign- born population from one census to another and the total immigration for the intervening period. The latest figures on the subject are given in Table 7. TABLE 7. IMMIGRATION COMPARED WITH INCREASE OF FOREIGN-BORN POPULA- TION. 1 Decade Immigration (Thousands) Increase in foreign-born population Number (Thousands) Per cent ratio to immigration 1850-1860 2,598 2,315 2,812 5,247 3,688 8,795 5,565 1,928 1,428 I,H3 2,570 1,092 3,175 358 74 62 40 50 29 36 6 1860-1870 1870-1880 1880-1890 1890-1900 19001910 1910-1920 2 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I., pp. 64, 135. XIII. Census. Popu- lation, vol. i., p. 781. J The comparative figures for the last decade do not include Orientals, the preliminary returns of the XIV. Census made public by the Bureau of the Census being confined to foreign-born white. The total number of white immigrants for the period from July i, 1910, to June 30, 1920, has been computed from the Report of the Commissioner - General of Immigration for 1920, Table XV., pp. 181-182. The difference between gross immigration and the net increase of the foreign-born population is the combined result of mortality and emigration. As the foreign-born population increases, an ever larger number of new arrivals DIAGRAM II. II. Movement of third-class passengers between the United States and European pofts, 1899-1909 (Tens of Thousands) 89 Immigration and Labor merely fill up the places of their predecessors claimed by death. The foreign-born white population of the United States in 1920 was twice as great as in iSSo 1 ; accordingly twice as many immigrants were required in 1920 as forty years before only to keep the numbers of foreign-born sta- tionary. The statistics of the inward and outward trans- atlantic passenger traffic are generally taken to represent the immigration and emigration movement. 2 The respec- tive figures for 1899-1909 are reproduced in Table 8 from the Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 4, Table 26, and plotted in Diagram II. on p. 89. TABLE 8. MOVEMENT OF THIRD CLASS PASSENGERS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPEAN PORTS DURING THE CALENDAR YEARS 1899 TO 1909. (THOUSANDS.) Year West-bound passengers East-bound passengers Net immigration ( +) or emigration (. ) 1899 381 118 +263 1900 503 156 +347 1901 545 141 +404 1902 753 177 +576 1903 887 252 +635 1904 762 371 +391 1905 1004 244 +760 1906 1223 338 +885 1907 1378 555 +823 1908 420 657 -237 1909 750 287 +463 1 The foreign-born white population increased from 6,559,679 in 1880 to 13,703,987 in 1920. 2 Richmond-Mayo-Smith: " Immigration and the Foreign-Born Pop- ulation." Publications of the American Statistical Association, vol. iii., pp. 305-306. Roland P. Falkner: "Some Aspects of the Immigra- tion Problem." Political Science Quarterly, March, 1904, p. 38. Our statistics of emigration do not go back of the fiscal year ended June 30, 1908. Nor can they be accepted as quite reliable, being of necessity based upon the declarations of the aliens at the time of their departure. The total number of departing aliens for the period from July i, 1907, to June 30, 1920, exceeded the number of avowed "emi- grants" by 2,513,000, whereas the total number of admitted aliens ex- ceeded the number of immigrants only by 1,867,000, which shows that IS \/ III. Monthly immigration and emigration, from July, 1907, to May, 1909 (thousands). 646,000 persons classified as "non-emigrant aliens," i, e. t 26 per cent, of that class, did not return to the United States. See Appendix, Table XXX. 91 Immigration and Labor It will be observed that the tide of immigration was rising until 1907, with a slight set-back during the Presidential year 1904. During the industrial crisis of 1908 immigration dropped at once nearly a million, compared with the high- water mark of the previous year, while emigration from the United States was about twice the number of 1906. The result was a net loss of nearly a quarter of a million through emigration. In 1909, with returning business confidence immigration increased and emigration receded to its nor- mal level of the years 1903- 1906.* The same tendencies appear still more clearly if the returns are compared by months, as in Table 9, and Diagram III. on p. 91.* TABLE 9. AVERAGE MONTHLY IMMIGRATION AND EMIGRATION. (THOUSANDS), 1907-1909. Net immigration( -f ) Period Admitted Departed or emigration ( ) July i-October 31 , 1907 November, 1907 116 132 47 94 + 69 + 38 Dec. i, 1907-Aug. 31, 1908 45 59 ~ 14 Sept. i, I9o8-Feb. 28, 1909 6l 33 . + 28 March- April, 1909 137 24 + 113 1 An examination of the Italian statistics of emigration to the United States and the return movement from the United States leads the Immi- gration Commission to the conclusion "that as a rule the causes which retard emigration also accelerate the exodus from the United States. . . . The effect of financial and industrial depressions in the United States is clearly apparent. . . . The most conspicuous instance . . . occurred in the year 1894, following the industrial depression of that period. In that year the outward movement from Italy decreased and the inward movement increased to such an extent that the number re- turning was 848 to every I ooo emigrating. The same tendency was shown again in 1904, immediately following the financial depression of the pre- ceding year. " Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 4, p. 229. 2 Annual Reports of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, 1908, p. 228, and 1910, p. 14. The monthly figures are for immigrant and emigrant aliens, as defined in the statistics of the Bureau of Immigration. These two classes are not identical with third-class passengers arriving Immigration and the Labor Market Prom July I, to October 31, 1907, immigration and emi- gration went on normally. The latter part of October witnessed the outbreak of the crisis, and the next month emigration doubled. Immigration still remained normal, inasmuch as those who arrived here in November had left their homes before the crisis. But from December immigra- tion dropped to one third of the number of arrivals in No- vember. During the next nine months emigration exceeded immigration by 14,000 persons monthly. From September I, 1908, the situation began to improve, and the number of immigrants went up again, while departures went down. In the spring of the next year immigration and emigration resumed their normal relation. It is evident that the immigration movement promptly responds to the business situation in the UnitedyStates. The question arises: How does immigration adjust itself to business conditions in America? The method by which this adjustment is effected is thus described by the Immi- gration Commission: It is entirely safe to assert that letters from persons who have emi- grated to friends at home have betp the immediate cause of by far the greater part of the remarkable movement from Southern and Eastern Europe to the United States during the past twenty-five years. There is hardly a village or community in Southern Italy and Sicily that has not contributed a portion of its population to swell the tide of emigration to the United States, and the same is true of large areas of Austria, Hungary, Greece, Turkey, and the Balkan States. ... It was fre- quently stated to members of the Commission that letters from persons who had emigrated to America were passed from hand to hand until most of the emigrants' friends and neighbors were acquainted with the contents. In periods of industrial activity, as a rule, the letters so circulated contain optimistic references to wages and opportunities for employment in the United States. ... The reverse is true during seasons of industrial depression in the United States. At such times intending emigrants are quickly informed by their friends in the United and departing. Those aliens who go to Europe with the expectation of returning may never come again, yet they are not included among " emigrant aliens. " As a result, the net emigration is lower in this 1 in the preceding table. 94 Immigration and Labor States relative to conditions of employment, and a great falling off in the tide of emigration is the immediate result. . . . Emigrants as a rule are practically assured that employment awaits them in America before they leave their homes for ports of embarkation. ... Ir, fact it may be said that immigrants, or at least newly -arrived immigrants, are substantially the agencies which keep the American labor market supplied with unskilled laborers from Europe. ... As a rule, each immigrant simply informs his nearest friends that employment can be had and advises them to come. It is these personal appeals which, more than all other agencies, promote and regulate the tide of European emigration to America. 1 These conclusions of the Immigration Commission are corroborated by Table 10. TABLE TO. IMMIGRANTS' CONNECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.* Immigrant aliens admitted Numbers (Thousands) Percentages 1908 1909 1910 1908 1909 1910 Total 783 752 1042 100 IOO IOO 82 13 5 Going to join: Relative . 596 128 59 t 583 122 47 857 133 52 76 16 8 77 17 6 Friend Neither 4 It appears that most of the immigrants come to join relatives, and that only a small proportion of those who land here have neither relatives nor friends to meet them on arrival. This percentage is much smaller for the new immigration than for the old, viz., 3 per cent for the former as against 10.6 per cent for the latter. 3 There is a remarkable coincidence of the percentage ratios for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1908 and 1909. 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, pp. 187-189. a Annual Reports of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, 1908, p. 15; 1909, p. 23; 1910, p. 21. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 4, Table 38. The figures are for 1908 and 1909. Immigration and the Labor Market 95 Both were partly affected by the crisis. On the other hand, the year 1910 shows an addition of 274,000, i. e. 47 per cent, to the number of immigrants coming to join their relatives, while the number of persons who came in 1908-1910 to join friends, and the number of those who seemingly had neither relatives nor friends in the United States, exhibit only slight fluctuations from year to year. This means that, as soon as conditions improved, the first thought of the older immigrants was of their kin whom they had left behind; friends came next. The correctness of this interpretation is supported by Table n, which shows the fluctuations in the number of immigrants whose passage was paid by their American relatives, compared with the number of dependents ad- mitted in official terminology, "no occupation (including women and children) " and also the fluctuations in the number of persons whose passage was paid by persons "other than self or relative," i. e. by friends. 1 The fiscal year ending June 30, 1908, included four prosperous months from July to October, 1907. Moreover, many of those who reached the United States later in the year had been provided with steamship tickets before the crisis. Their American relatives and friends must have been saving the money with which their passage was paid, for some months previous to their landing. Steamship tickets are quite commonly sold on small weekly payments. The full effect of the crisis therefore manifested itself during the next fiscal year (beginning July I, 1908), when the number of immigrants who arrived on tickets prepaid by their American relatives dropped twenty per cent. In 1910 their number again came up to the level of 1908. In 1908 the number of such immigrants exceeded by 32,000 the number of dependents coming to join their relatives who had preceded them. Evidently some of the resident aliens had raised the means to send for their brothers, sisters, and ' Report of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, 1908, pp. 15, 35; 1999, w- 23. 4*; ifit, 2I - * 9 6 Immigration and Labor J other self-supporting relatives, in addition to the members of their immediate households. In 1909 the number of immigrants assisted by their American relatives was barely equal to the total number of dependents who came to join their husbands and fathers. Apparently while employ- ment was scarce the foreign-born workman could spare no money to send for his more distant relatives. In 1910 im- proved business conditions again brought to this country quite a number of breadwinners (14,000) whose passage was paid by their American relatives. The number of immigrants assisted by their American friends showed similar fluctuations. TABLE it. ASSISTED IMMIGRATION Year' Ending June 30 1908 1909 1910 Assisted immigrants (thousands) : Passage paid, by relative . . 275 22O 27J. Dependents 24. -I 221 */4 2OO Difference +32 I + 14 IO 8 12 * Another potent agency which regulates immigration is the great number of returning immigrants. As a rule, says the Immigration Commission, they are those who have succeeded. "The money they can show makes a vivid impression. They are dispensers of information and inspiration, and are often willing to follow up the inspira- tion by loans to prospective emigrants." 1 During the ten -year period 1900-1909, three million people returned to Europe from the United States. (See Table 8 above.) Compared with this army of promoters of immigration, 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vqj. 4, p. 58. Immigration and the Labor Market 97 the much blamed steamship agent fades into insignificance. A simple calculation will show that the number of steamship agents is grossly exaggerated by popular imagination. In order to make something by "stimulating immigration," an agent must sell at least one ticket a week; his commission on $37, which is the average cost of passage from Europe, could not be too great at that. A good many tickets are prepaid on this side; yet if every steamship ticket were sold through an agent, the annual emigration of a million persons could barely support twenty thousand agents. This scarcely equals one per cent of the volunteer force of immigration promoters who have returned from America within the past ten years, with every allowance made for duplications. It is clearly against all sense of proportion to magnify the "propaganda" of a few thousand ticket agents into a contributing cause of this modern Volkerwanderung. * The facts brought to light by the investigation of the Immi- gration Commission in Europe will tend to dissipate this popular delusion. The Commission found that in Greece, which "according to its population furnishes more immi- grants to the United States than any other country . . . solicitation by steamship companies probably plays rela- tively a small part even as a contributory cause of the movement." In Austria "government officials and others interested in the emigration situation expressed the belief that the solicitations of agents had little effect on the emigration movement, which was influenced almost entirely by economic conditions." Unquestionably, steamship agents in all parts of Europe solicit business in competition with one another, but they do it, as Mr. T. V. Powderly has found, "much as insurance agents do. ... One method adopted is to translate editorials and articles from American newspapers relative to the prosperity of the United States, which articles are distributed among pros- 1 There are some people who similarly believe that the trade-union movement of our days is "stimulated" by the "labor agitators," walking delegates, and business agents of the unions. 98 Immigration and Labor pective emigrants. " The Immigration Commission learned in Hungary that steamship agents addressed "personal letters to prospective emigrants advising how to leave Hungary without the consent of the government. Letters of this nature were presented to the Commission. Some of them are accompanied by crudely drawn maps indicating the location of all the Hungarian control stations on the Austrian border, and the routes of travel by which such stations can be avoided." 1 It is clear that such letters can appeal only to those who have already made up their minds to emigrate. The immigrant is not as simple-mindea and credulous as he is popularly represented to be. ' ' Several American States have attempted to attract immigrants by the distribution in Europe of literature advertising the attractions of such States. A few States ha. ... .om- missioners to various countries for the purpose of inducing immigration, but although some measure of success has attended such efforts, the propaganda has had little effect on the immigration movement as a whole. ' ' 2 There appears to be no sound reason Why the "editorials and articles from American newspapers relative to the prosperity of the United States, " circulated by a steamship agent, should have a greater effect with the European peasant than the literature distributed by an official representative of an American State. The conclusion reached by the Immigra- tion Commission is that "immigration from Europe pro- ceeds according to well-defined individual plans rather than in a haphazard way. " 3 The Commission qualifies this con- clusion by the statement that since "selling steerage tickets to America is the sole or chief occupation of large numbers of persons in Southern and Eastern Europe," and since "these local agents, as a rule, solicit business," they "con- sequently encourage emigration." 4 This argument might be made broader by substituting the principal for the agent : it is the steamship companies that encourage emigration by 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 4, p. 63. 2 Ibid., vol. i, p. 192. 3 Ibid., p. 188. 4 Ibid., vol. 4, p. 62. Immigration and the Labor Market 99 making-it their business to sell steerage tickets to America, for it is a self-evident truth that should the steamship companies discontinue the sale of steerage tickets, emigra- tion would be discouraged. Inasmuch, however, as the Immigration Commission recognizes the difficulty for the ordinary laborer in Southern and Eastern Europe to raise the price of a steerage ticket, "no matter how strong the desire to emigrate may be, " the question is, by what means the local agents encourage the emigration of impecunious laborers who have no relatives or friends in America willing to advance them the price of a ticket. The popular answer, is that the "new immigration" is largely "stimulated" byl employers of labor masquerading as "friends" of the immi- grant It is believed that "the ends of the earth have been ranra 'died in the search for the low standards of living combined with patient industriousness. " * Representatives of labor speak indiscriminately of all Slav and Italian immigration as "imported," in other words as contract labor. The truth is that the frequency of the practice in recent times has been greatly exaggerated by popular imagination. The investigations of the Im- migration Commission, both in the United States and in Europe, failed to disclose any evidence of systematic im- portation of contract laborers. 2 In the Connellsville coke region of Pennsylvania, old inhabitants remember that as far back as 1882 "some companies had agents in -Europe soliciting and encouraging the immigration of Slovaks, Poles, and Bohemians . . . and some immigrants may have been imported as contract laborers. 1 ' 3 Of what little conse- quence these importations could have been, is clear from the fact that eight years later, at the census of 1890, there were 1 John R. Commons: Races and Immigrants in America, p. 152. a The inquiries made by the Commission in Europe "did not disclose that actual contracts involving promises of employment between employers in the United States and laborers in Europe were responsible for any considerable part of the present emigration movement." Reports, vol. 4 p. 60. No figures or specific cases are cited. See also, further, Chapter XIX. 3 /&*, vol. 6, p. 257. ioo Immigration and Labor enumerated in Fayette and Westmoreland counties (the Connellsviile region) 4788 natives of Hungary, Bohemia, and Poland, of both sexes, all ages, and all occupations. 1 It is quite conceivable that in the case of a strike a great corporation might have resorted to the importation of a force of strikebreakers regardless of cost. There is a "legend" in the Pennsylvania anthracite field that during a strike in 1870 a breaker belonging to Eckley B. Coxe was burned down, whereupon he secured through his superin^ tendent "two shiploads of his Hungarian countrymen to man the new structure. There is no evidence of any further importations of immigrants by the mine owners, since there han been no necessity for such an effort. 112 With immigration running into hundreds of thousands annually, there i7 no economic advantage in importing a few thousand a year, as they could have no effect upon labor conditions in general. 3 On the other hand, their importation would in> volve an outlay of money for their passage without any guarantee of repayment, as the contract of employment could not be enforced in law in case the laborer chose to break it. It is not usual for an employer of labor in this country to advance a sum equal to a month's wages without any security to a laborer in his employ. That the personal credit of the laborer should be enhanced by his absence from the United States hardly accords with common ex- perience. Apart from economic considerations, the Immi- gration Commission finds that "owing to the rigidity of the law and the fact that special provision is made for its en- forcement there are probably at the present time relatively few actual contract laborers admitted." 4 This conclusion 1 Population of the United States, XI. Census, vol. i., p. 654 (com- puted). 3 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 16, p. 661. * A sound view of the question is taken by Prof. Adams and Dr. Sumner in their book on I&bor Problems, wHere they say that under the influence of the increase of immigration it is no longer profitable to "induce** immigration (pp. 90-91). Reports, vol. i,p. 29. Immigration and the Labor Market 101 ought to be accepted as final. It would be impossible for any corporation or labor agent to operate on a large scale in violation of the law without being detected. Human experience has no record of a secret guarded by a multitude. The few violations of the contract labor law that elude the vigilance of the immigration officials cannot affect the labor market. 'The supply of immigrant labor is regulated by free com- petition, like that of any other commodity. It may some- times exceed the demand and at other times fall short of it ; in the long run, however, supply adjusts itself to demand. If we compare the totals for industrial cycles, including years of panic, of depression, and of prosperity, we find a remarkable regularity in the ratio of immigration to popula- tion. In Table 12 the addition to population through immigration during the twenty-year period 1891-1910 is collated with the corresponding figures for the preceding two periods of equal length. TABLE 12. POPULATION AND IMMIGRATION Census Population Immigration for twenty years following Year Thousands Thousands Percentage ratio to population at preceding census Period 1850 23,192 38,558 62,622 5,019 8,059 12,483 21.2 20.9 19.9 1851-1870 1871-1890 I89I-I910 l8?O. . . 5* 1800. . f> \ \-> These figures show that during the past sixty years, not- Jlvithstanding the fluctuations from year to year, in the long run the ratio of immigration to population has been well-nigh constant, with a slightly declining tendency as population has grown. Although the total number of immigrants for the period 1891-1910 was 50 per cent in / ^ Immigration and Labor tiie total for the preceding period, yet the addition to population was relatively smaller during the later period. It has also been shown (see Table 2) that the per cent distribution of immigrants by occupations has undergone little change during the past half-century, notwithstanding the rise and fall in numbers from decade to decade. The ratio of skilled mechanics has during the last thirty years remained at 20 per cent, while unskilled laborers have made up 57 per cent of all immigrants. This regularity indicates that the demand for labor determines the character, as as the volume of immigration. CHAPTER V . THE DEMAND FOR LABOR IN AGRICULTURE THE preference of the "new" immigrants for city employ- ments over agricultural pursuits is viewed with appre- hension by philanthropists and sociologists. It is evident, however, that even the "desirable" immigrant from North- ern and Western Europe who brings with him on an average $55* lacks the necessary means to rent a farm, let alone to buy one. 2 At best he can only obtain employment as a farm hand, which depends primarily upon the demand for farm labor. And here he is confronted with the fact that the American farmer cannot keep his own sons on the farm. The industrial development of the United States has manifested itself in a relative decrease, and in some sections in a numerical decrease of the rural population. In New England and New York an actual depopulation of the rural districts was recorded by the census of 1890. The next census showed a loss of rural population in New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, and Kansas. Maryland and Illinois sus- tained similar losses from 1880 to 1890, but recovered them within the next ten years. 3 The published bulletins of the last census show a numerical decrease of the rural population in the following States of the Central West: 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 4 (in press). 3 The average value per farm, exclusive of real estate, in 1900, amounted to $1173. H. W. Quaintance: The Influence of Farm Machinery en Production and Labor, p. 58. * Supplementary Analysis, XII. Census, p. 78, Table XXXIX 103 104 Immigration and Labor TABLE 13. DECREASE OF THE POPULATION OF RURAL TERRITORY, I90O-I9IO State . Number Per cent Illinois 111,963 7.0 Indiana 132,266 9.5 Iowa 152,673 12. i Kansas 4,919 0.5 Michigan 9,946 0.8 Missouri 133.489 8.0 Ohio 93,055 5.3 Wisconsin 8,201 0.7 Even where the total rural population of a State has increased since 1900, the maps given in the census bul- letins show a few agricultural counties with a declining population. This depopulation of rural territory is due to emigration of native Americans of native stock. The figures for 1910 are as yet not available; the census of 1900 recorded in Kan- sas a loss of 2.8 per cent of the native population of native parentage in settlements of less than 2500 inhabitants, and in Nebraska a loss of i .3 per cent of the same element. In New England, New York, and New Jersey the loss was still greater; the maximum was reached in Connecticut, viz., 16.7 per cent. 1 The popular way to account for a social phenomenon is to seek an explanation in the personal tastes and dislikes of individuals or racial groups. "Much has been said of a mad rush to cities," said Prof. Charles H. Cooley before the Michigan Political Science Association, in July, 1902, "and the movement has often been spoken of as if it were altogether a kind of dissipation, like going to the saloon. But if there were no solider ground for the migration than this we should find the migrants plunged into pauperism and vice after they get to the cities, instead of pursuing useful remunerative labor as is ordinarily the case. The real causes of the decrease of rural population are chiefly economic. " These causes affect the native and the foreign 1 Supplementary Analysis, XII. Census, pp. 620-627, Tables 10 and 1 1. fei m DIAGRAM IV. I 1 fifctin 'IC(JU OtKt I I m IV. Relative per-capita production of coal, agricultural staples and live stock. 105 io6 Immigration and Labor current to the cities alike. Since the early days of Irish and German immigration the growing industries of the cities have offered a better market for labor than agri- culture. A comparative view of the demand for laboi in agriculture and in industry since 1870 is furnished in Diagram IV, where the per capita production of the principal agricultural staples and live stock is compared with the per capita production of coal, the latter being chosen as the measure of industrial expansion. 1 Whereas the pro- duction of coal has quadrupled, the increase of the output of cotton is only about 90 per cent, the increase of other farm products less than 50 per cent, and stock breeding has not kept pace with the increase of population. It is patent that the demand for farm hands must have lagged far behind the demand for labor in manufacturing, mining and transportation. The relative number of persons engaged in agriculture fell from 21.79 per cent of the total population in 1840 to X 543 P er cen t in 1870. This decrease was not confined to any one State or section, but was universal, with the exception of Florida. In New York and all New England States there was during the same period an absolute de- crease of the agricultural population from 869,000 to 697,000, i. ., 20 per cent. 2 The revolution wrought in American farming by the industrial development of the past seventy years has tended to reduce the demand for labor on the farm. The American farm of the first half of the nineteenth cen- tury was the seat of a highly diversified business, comprising not only the raising of food and of material for clothing, x The figures for Diagram IV are taken from an article by Prof. Homer C. Price on "The Reorganization of American Farming" in Popular Science Monthly , May, 1910, p. 464; the Census Report on Mines and Quarries, 1902, p. 669, Table 6; and Statistical Abstract, 1911, Table No. 335. The figures for agricultural products are averages for each decade beginning 1866-1875 and for the quadrennial period 1905- 1908. Coal production per capita is for each census year since 1870. 3 Bulletin of the Department of Labor, No. 1 1 , pp. 400, 402. The Demand for Labor in Agriculture 107 but also the preparation and manufacture of these pro- ducts. 1 Wakefield, in 1833, gave the following description of the American farmer: Free Americans, who cultivate the soil, follow many other occupations. Some portion of the furniture and tools which they use is commonly made by themselves. They frequently build their own houses, and carry to market, at whatever distance, the produce of their own industry. They are spinners and weavers, they make soap and candles, as well as, in many cases, shoes and clothes for their own use. 2 With such a variety of occupations there was work for a hired man at all seasons of the year. But the development of manufactures has differentiated from the farming business one industry after another and removed them from the farm. 3 The time during which a hired man can be kept employed on the farm has been reduced in consequence to a few months in the year. Still until the middle of the nineteenth century the mills were quite commonly run by water power, the supply of which determined their location. The small country towns were alive with little industries, which offered to the farm laborer a prospect of employment during the winter when work was scarce on the farm. 4 But the general substitution cf steam for water power and the consequent concentration of industry removed the factories from the small towns to 1 L. H. Bailey: The State and the Farmer, pp. 6, 7. 3 E. G. Wakefield: England and America, vol. i., pp. 21,22. a "At the present time, throughout probably the greater part of the country . . . butter-making is ordinarily done away from the farm, " but in 1870, "butter was made ... on the farms and as part of farm work. The development of the agricultural implement industry is another instance. The manufacture of the implements and machines from being a feature of farm work has become a distinct branch of manufactures, employing, according to the returns of the XII census, during the census year reported on, an 'average number' of 46,582 persons besides 10,046 salaried officials, clerks, etc." M. W. Quaintance , loc. cit., pp. 44-45, 74. * Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. x., pp. cl. and 889. Report o*,,Cdnditinly 40,737, a i.e., about 1 Report on Condition of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States, vol. ix., pp. 80-81 a Frank J. Sheridan: "Italian, Slavic, and Hungarian Unskilled Im- Unemployment 121 17,000 a year. The total number of laborers who were unemployed at any time during the census year 1900 (the latest for which data are available) was 40,108' and the rate of unemployment in 1904-1906, as far as can be judged, was about the same as in 1900.* It is safe to say that the labor agencies were able to place outside of New York City less than one half of all unemployed laborers. The majority stayed in New York waiting for work "to pick up." We come next to the cyclical fluctuations of business which result in variations of the number employed from year to year. A temporary decline in business means unemployment for a number of wage-earners who were employed the year before. Such fluctuations of business occur in countries with a net emigration, like Great Britain, or in France whose population is practically stationary, as well as in the United States. The effect of these fluctua- tions of business activity "is the requirement in each trade of reserves of labor to meet the fluctuations of work inci- dental to years of prosperity." 3 An illustration of the range of these cyclical fluctuations is given in Diagram VI. on p. 1 25.* The most important cause of unemployment in point of numbers affected, however, is to be found in the fact that "the actual demand is that of each of many separate employers in many different places." 5 The effect of this "dissipation of the demand for labor in each trade" 6 upon migrant Laborers in United States," Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 72, p. 417. 1 Occupations at the XII. Census, Table XLIII., p. 634. a According to the statistics of the New York Bureau of Labor, the ratio of unemployed in 1900 was 21.0 per cent; in 1904, 30.5 per cent; in 1905, 14.6 per cent and in 1906, 8.6 per cent, averaging for 1904- 1906, 17.9 per cent. (Report of the New York Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1908, p. xviii., Table 10.) While these figures relate to members of labor unions only, they may serve as a standard of comparison of general business conditions in various years. * Beveridge, loc. cit., p. 13- Based on Report of the New York Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1910, p. viii, s Beveridge, loc. cit., p. 10. 6 IM*., p. 13- 122 Immigration and Labor the mass of wage-earners can be measured by the difference between the aggregate number of hands required by all establishments at their busiest seasons and the aggregate minimum number employed when business is at its lowest ebb. To be sure, this difference does not represent the amount of unemployment at any given date, since the seasonal variations are not simultaneous in all industries and a considerable portion of the unskilled laborers readily shift from one industry to another. But every change of position involves some period of unemployment, as it re- quires some time to find a new job. This is clearly demon- strated by the census statistics of manufactures. The difference between the greatest and the least average number employed during any month in the year is far short of the difference between the aggregate greatest and the aggregate least number employed in all establishments during the same year, as shown in Table 16 next below: TABLE 16. RANGE OF FLUCTUATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, 1899 AND 1904' 185 9 19 34 Number employed (thousands) Simultane- ously, monthly average Aggregate in all establishments at any time during the year Simultane- ously, monthly average Aggregate in all establishments at any time during the year 67 7O6Q 5677 7OI7 Minimum . . 4.Q-J8 4.527 5262 4.CQQ Difference 629 2545 415 2418 Percentage to minimum. . H 56 9 53 1 Compiled from XII. Census Report on Manufactures, Part I, p. 59, Table 3; Genius Report on Manufactures, 1905, Part I, p. Ixxix., Table XXVII. Unemployment 123 In order to ascertain the total number of wage-earners who had steady employment during the year, the number employed by each individual manufacturer on the slackest day in his own business must be added to similar numbers for all others, though the days may not have coincided. It appears that this number was less than the lowest monthly average, which means that even in the worst month of the year more people are wanted on .an average than can be given permanent employment. On the other hand, while during the best month of the year 1899 only fourteen ad- ditional wage-earners were needed over and above every one hundred who had permanent employment, actually four times as many persons were hired for temporary jobs during the same year. In 1904, the proportion was still more striking, the number of persons hired temporarily was nearly six times greater than the actual temporary force needed at the busiest time during the year. In either year there were over one half as many temporary jobs as permanent "positions. Of course, these figures comprise many duplications ; there may have been few wage-earners over the greatest number that could actually have been employed at the same time; in that case each of the tem- porary employees had about four different jobs during the year 1899 and six during the year 1904. The unemploy- ment intervening between one temporary job and another clearly did not depend upon the number of applicants for jobs, but was determined by the vicissitudes of business. The whole problem of unemployment is admirably eluci- dated in Mr. Beveridge's exhaustive treatise on the subject, from which the following is condensed : A general and normal excess of the supply of labor over the demand appears to be explicable only by an excessively rapid increase of popula- tion. But sucb an explanatior does not square with the facts showing irreducible minimum of unemployment precisely in those industries which have grown with exceptional rapidity in recent years. The general formula for the supply of labor in an industry appears to be this: for work requiring, if concentrated at one spot, at most ninety- 124 Immigration and Labor eight men, there will actually be eighty in regular employment; there will be a hundred in all, so that at all times two at least are out of work. The twenty, however, are as much part of the industrial system as are the eighty ; the reserve is as indispensable as the regulars. The idleness, now of some, now of others, of the reserve is mainly responsible for the irreducible minimum of unemployment. The figures here given have only an illustrative value; the proportion of regular and reserve and irreducible minimum vary from trade to trade. The principle is of the greatest generality. The rule for each trade is to have more men than are called for together even at the busiest moment. The normal state of every industry is to be overcrowded with labor, in the sense of having drawn into it more men than can ever find em- ployment in it at any one time. This is the direct consequence of the work of each industry being distributed between many separate em- ployees each subject to fluctuations of fortune. // depends upon the nature of the demand for labor, not upon the volume of the whole supply. To speak of the reserve of labor in a trade may become, in fact, only another way of speaking of the whole volume of unemployment in it. The change, however, is not one of words alone. It implies a revolu- tion of mental attitude. It involves perception of unemployment, not as a thing standing by itself an inexplicable excrescence on the indus- trial system but as a thing directly related to that system and as necessary to it as are capital and labor themselves. Unemployment is not to bz identified as a problem of general over-popula- tion. Unemployment arises because, while the supply of labor grows steadily, the demand for labor, in growing, varies incessantly in volume, distribution, and character. This variation in several of its forms at least flows directly from the control of production by many competing employers. It is obvious that, so long as the industrial world is split up into separate groups of producers each group with a life of its own, and growing or decaying in ceaseless attrition upon its neighbors there must be insecurity of employment. Unemployment, in other words, is to some extent at least part of the price of industrial competition part of the waste without which there could be no competition at all. B. Unemployment and Immigration It has been shown that unemployment does not depend upon the volume of the supply of labor, but is determined by the nature of the demand for labor, which produces a "relative surplus-population." Is itrnot possible, however 1 Beveridge, loc. cit. t pp. 70, 76, 99, 100, 103, 235. "A surplus labor- ing population is ... a condition of existence of the capitalist mode of DIAGRAM VI. Per cent, of employed and unemployed members of trade unions in the State of New York, by months, 1902-1909. production. . . . With accumulation, and the development of produc- tiveness of labor that accompanies it, the power of sudden expansion of capital grows also. . . . There must be the possibility of throwing great masses of men suddenly on the decisive points without injury to the scale of production in other spheres. . . . The whole form of the movement of modern industry depends, therefore, upon the constant transformation of a part of the laboring population into unemployed or half-employed hands. . . . Taking them as a whole, the general move- ments of wages are exclusively regulated by the expansion and con- traction of the industrial reserve army. . . . They are, therefore, not determined by the variations of the absolute number of the working population, but by the varying proportions in which the working class is divided into active and reserve army, by the increase or diminutirti in the relative amount of the surplus population." Karl Marx, Capital, part i., ch. xxv., sec. 3. 126 Immigration and Labor that the effects of ' 'the normal glutting of the labor market" x may be aggravated by immigration? It is asserted, indeed, on the strength of the investigation of the Immigration Commission "that the point of complete saturation has already been reached in the employment of recent immigrants in mining and manufacturing estab- lishments." 2 The Commission holds "that even with the remarkable expansion of industry during the past few years there has been created an oversupply of unskilled labor, which "is reflected in a curtailed number of working days." 3 It is further argued that the oversupply of unskilled labor indirectly affects the skilled trades; more workers who might otherwise find employment as unskilled laborers are pushed up the scale to compete for skilled positions. This is especially felt in slack seasons when skilled mechanics would welcome any kind of work, even unskilled, which would tide them over the hard times. But the oversupply of unskilled labor restricts their opportunities in this field and intensifies competition in the skilled trades. When two competitors apply for one job in an overstocked labor market, the cheaper man will outbid the other. It is accordingly inevitable that the immigrant with a lower standard of living must displace the American workman. If this theory is correct, we must find a higher percentage of unemployment among the native than among the foreign- born breadwinners. In fact, however, we find the following percentages of unemployment ascertained by the census for > x Beveridge, loc. cit., p. 13. * Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., p. 197. 3 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I , p. 39. The Com- mission does not consistently adhere to this view. Elsewhere, in dis- cussing the causes of the outward movement of immigrants leaving the United States permanently, the Commission says: ''That it is not due to lack of opportunity for employment, except in a period of depression, is evident from the fact that there is a steady influx of European laborers who have little or no difficulty in finding employment here." Ibid., vol. 4 (in press). Unemployment 127 1 900: native white males, 21.2 per cent; foreign white males 21.0 per cent. 1 ^The difference between the two classes is negligible. The figures do not sustain the theory that the immigrants have an advantage over the native American workmen in the matter of securing employment. Has the "cheap" immigrant a better chance to hold his job, once secured, than the native American workman? An answer to this question is found in the following table reproduced from the Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, p. 87. TABLE 17. PER CENT, DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND FOREIGN-BORN MALE IRON AND STEEL WORKERS 1 6 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER BY NUMBER OF MONTHS OF EMPLOYMENT Number of months employed Native born Foreign born Of native father Of foreign father 9 and over 6O.2 234 13-5 2.9 50.2 28.3 I7.I 4.4 41.4 32.3 2O. I 6.2 6 and under 9 . . and under 6 ess than 3 Total IOO.O IOO.O IOO.O 1 Occupations at the XII. Census, p. ccxxvi. The census averages for unemployment among female breadwinners are not reliable. The highest ratios of unemployment were found among school teachers, 61.2 per cent, and in agricultural pursuits, 44.3 per cent, (p. ccxxxi), where- as the ratio for manufactures was 22.4 per cent, for domestic and per- sonal service, 17.1 per cent, and for trade and transportation, n.i per cent (p. ccxxviii). The teachers' vacation was included by the compilers of the census data under unemployment. Similarly, we find that in most of the census talles on occupations female members of farmers' families who were helping on the farm were lumped together with hired help under the common designation of "agricultural laborers." These "farm laborers (members of family) " numbered two thirds of all "agricultural laborers" (ibid., p. 7). The part of the year when there was no work for them on the farm was also counted as "unemployment." 128 Immigration and Labor The statistics of the Immigration Commission do not show that the immigrant holds his position longer than the American-born workman. On the contrary, in the iron and steel industry, which is among those most affected by immigration, the native workman is given more steady employment than the immigrant. If there exists a causal connection between immigration and unemployment, we must expect to find more unemploy- ment in those sections of the United States where the immigrants are mostly concentrated. This assumption is disproved by Table 18 next following: TABLE 1 8. COMPARATIVE PERCENTAGES OF UNEMPLOYED AND OF FOREIGN-BORN BREADWINNERS BY GEOGRAPHICAL DIVISIONS, ^Geographical divisions Ratio of for- eign white to total num- ber of bread- winners Ratio of breadwinners unemployed dur- ing a portion of the year to total number in each class and division Manufacturing and mechanical pursuits Domestic and personal service (including la- borers) Continental United States 19-7 2.9 37 23.5 277 31-5 27.2 25.2 28.6 29-5 28.1 25-7 28.1 28.1 31.0 30.7 28.6 24-3 South Atlantic. . . . South Central North Central Western North Atlantic . . . As a result of this method of classification, the number of "unemployed " female agricultural laborers (293,707) exceeded y nearly one third the total number of hired female farm help (222,597). These two classes of occupations furnished two fifths of all unemployed females (494,202 out of a total of 1,241,492), while the ratio of foreign-born was only 5.3 per cent for teachers and 0.8 per cent for agricultural laborers (ibid., pp. 10-11, Table 2). In consequence the average percentage of " unemployment " for native white women in all occupations appears to be higher than for foreign -born. It is evident that the census data on unemploy ent among women are misleading, which is conceded in the census report. 1 Occupations at the XII. Census, Table XCIIL, pp. Ixxxi., ccxxxv., and ccxxxvi., Tables XVII. and XCIII. Unemployment 129 A glance at the table shows that the percentage of un- employment is not affected by the percentage of foreign- born engaged in the main classes of occupations. The variation of the ratio of unemployment from section to section is confined within narrow limits. The ratio of un- employment in manufactures is the same for the South Atlantic and the North Atlantic States, though there are very few foreign-born in the South Atlantic States, while in the North Atlantic States they constitute nearly one third of all operatives. In all other sections of the country the ratio of unemployment is slightly higher than in the North Atlantic States, while the percentage of foreign-born breadwinners engaged in manufactures is less, and in the South Central States much less than in the North Atlan- tic States. The same is true of the miscellaneous collection of occupations lumped together in census statistics under the head of "domestic and personal service," which in- cludes unskilled laborers. We find the lowest ratio of un- employment in the North Atlantic States, with 31.5 per cent of foreign-born breadwinners and the highest in the South Central States, with but 3.7 per cent of foreign-born breadwinners. Comparative statistics showing the ratio of unemploy- ment and the percentage of foreign-born breadwinners by sex and by States are available for the manufacturing industries at the XII. Census. The measure of unemploy- ment, for the purposes of this comparison, is the difference between the total greatest and the total least monthly average number employed, expressed as a percentage of the greatest monthly average. The data for manufactures relate to the calendar year 1899 and the distribution of breadwinners by nativity is for the summer of 1900. The dates are sufficiently close to make the figures comparable. 1 There is considerable variation of the ratio of unemploy- ment, as well as of that of foreign-born, by States. There are some States with a high percentage of foreign-born and 1 See Appendix, Table III. 130 Immigration and Labor low ratio of unemployment and vice versa; there are others with high percentages both of foreign-born and of un- employment and vice versa. The ratio of unemployment seems sometimes to rise and sometimes to fall with the percentages of foreign-born. But a significant correla- tion between the two ratios is disclosed if all States are combined into two areas according to the ratio of foreign-born engaged in manufactures and mechanical pursuits : I. Those States where the ratio of foreign-born in manufactures is below the average for the United States; II. Those States where that ratio is above the average for the United States. The statistics relating to each area are summarized separately for male and female wage-earners in Tables 19 and 20. TABLE 19. ' GREATEST AND LEAST NUMBER OF MALE WAGE-EARNERS EMPLOYED IN MANUFACTURES DURING ANY ONE MONTH OF THE YEAR 1899, GREATEST NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED, AND PERCENTAGE OF FOREIGN- BORN MALES ENGAGED IN MANUFACTURES AND MECHANICAL PURSUITS IN 1900, BY GROUPS OF STATES. States with percentage of foreign-born in manufactures and mechanical pursuits Employed in manufactures (thousands) Unemployed sometime Per cent ratio of foreign- born to all males in manufactures and me- chanical pursuits. Least number Great- est number Thou- sands Percent of greatest number employed Least Greatest Below the average. . Above the average. . 1224 2524 1501 2907 277 383 18.5 13-2 I.O 33-2 31-9 53-8 Total 3748 4408 660 ^5-o Average 32.7 Unemployment TABLE 20. GREATEST AND LEAST NUMBER OF FEMALE WAGE-EARNERS EMPLOYED IN MANUFACTURES DURING ANY ONE MONTH OF THE YEAR 1899, GREAT- EST NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED, AND PERCENTAGE OF FOREIGN-BORN FEMALES ENGAGED IN MANUFACTURES AND MECHANICAL PURSUITS, IN IQOO, BY GROUPS OF STATES. Employed in manufactures Unemployed Per cent ratio of foreign- born to all females in States with percentage of foreign-born in (thousands) sometime manufactures and me- chanical pursuits manufactures and mechanical pursuits Least number Great- est number Thou- sands Per cent of greatest number Least Greatest employed Below the average. . 352 442 90 20.4 0.2 20.3 Above the average. . 573 668 95 14.2 22.7 46.2 Average Total 925 IIIO 185 I6. 4 21.4 Combining all the States where the immigrants furnish from one third to more than one half of all males engaged in manufactures and mechanical pursuits, we find that the ratio of unemployment in that area as a whole is lower than in the other area, where the immigrants are few in numbers, rising in no State to one third of all males employed in manufacturing industries and falling as low as i per cent. The same rule holds true with regard to female wage-earners employed in manufactures. On the whole, unemployment is in inverse ratio to the relative number of foreign-born. The underlying cause of this relation will be apparent, if we remember that the number of foreign-born wage- earners is regulated by immigration and emigration and that both movements promptly respond to changes in the business situation. (See Chapter IV.) Still the variation of the ratio of unemployment by States may be affected by the localization of industries; certain industries concentrated in a State with a small foreign-born population may through climatic or other causes be more subject to ebb and flow than other industries located in a 132 Immigration and Labor State with a large immigrant population. The ratio of unemployment must therefore be compared for different occupations with a varying percentage of foreign-born breadwinners. Diagram VII furnishes the data for a comparative study of fifty leading occupations which gave employment, in 1900, to seven and a half million male breadwinners. 1 If it be true that unemployment is intensified by immi- gration, the aggregations of solid black bars representing unemployment and striped bars representing the percentage of foreign-born male breadwinners in each occupation should be expected to display some similarity in outline. No such tendency is suggested by the diagram ; the variation of the ratio of unemployment for different occupations shows no effects of immigration. Although the number of occupations selected for compari- son, as well as the number of persons engaged in them, is very large and well distributed over all sections of the country, yet, in order to eliminate the possible effect of localization of industries, we shall next compare the varia- tions of the ratios of unemployment and of the percentage of foreign-born within the same occupations by States. Space forbids an exhaustive treatment of all the leading occupa- tions shown in Diagram VII. Our study will be confined to three occupation groups: bituminous coal-miners, common laborers, and cotton-mill operatives. The first two have been selected in view of the popular belief, accepted by the Immigration Commission, that they are suffering from an oversupply of unskilled immigrant labor. The cotton-mill operatives, on the other hand, afford the opportunity to contrast the New England mills, where the majority of the workers are of foreign birth, with the Southern mills dependent almost exclusively upon native labor. Diagram VIII presents in graphic form the ratio of un- 1 The comparative figures for these occupations, as well as for the leading occupations of female breadwinners are given in the Appendix, Table IV. DIAGRAM VII D"~ H J EinfUTttO AU. re/W BY. FoRiton WHrtt VII. Per cent unemployed at any time during the year and per cent of foreign-bora in fifty leading occupations, 1900. T33 134 Immigration and Labor employment in bituminous coal-mining collated with the percentage of foreign-born miners. The former ratio has DIAGRAM VIII Percentage Foreign -bom Ratio of Unemployment VH1. Ratio of unemployment in bituminous coal mines, 1902, and percentage of foreign-born miners, 1900. been computed by the method applied above to manu- factures. The greatest and the least number of wage- earners are taken from the census report on Mines and Unemployment 135 Quarries for 1902, while the percentage of foreign-born is that for 1900, but the dates are sufficiently near for compara- tive purposes. 1 As the statistics of occupations by States do not distinguish coal miners from other miners and quarrymen, the comparison is confined to those States where coal mining was practically the only mining industry. 2 The diagram includes, however, all principal coal-mining States in 1902 which produced 83 per cent of the total coal output of the United States. 3 No connection between unemployment and immigration is disclosed by the diagram. Pennsylvania, which holds the third highest place according to the percentage of foreign-born miners, stands next to the State with the lowest ratio of unemployment. The highest ratio of unemployment is found in West Virginia, where the percentage of foreign-born miners is next to the lowest Similar variations by States appear in the statistics relating to the other two occupations selected for compari- son. To further trace the interdependence, if any, between immigration and unemployment in these occupa- tions, we shall again combine all States into two areas, first, according to the percentage of foreign-born ; and next, in the same manner, according to the ratio of unemploy- ment. The results of these combinations are summarized in Tables 21 and 22. 4 An examination of Table 21 shows that the percentage of unemployment is slightly less in the area where the immigrants furnish 44 per cent of all common labor, than in the rest of the United States where the foreign-born laborers constitute one tenth of the total number. The 1 See Appendix, Table V. 3 In Pennsylvania a large number of coal miners were employed in the anthracite mines; the latter, however, were affected by the strike of 1902 and could for this reason not be included in a comparison between the greatest and the least number employed. But the employment of immigrants is general in both classes of mines. * Mines and Quarries, p. 680. < Detailed statistical data for each State will be found in the Appendix Tables VI. and VII. 136 Immigration and Labor TABLE 21. LABORERS (MALE), FOREIGN-BORN AND UNEMPLOYED, IQOO. Areas Total Foreign-born Unemployed Number Per cent Number Per cent With percentage of foreign-born: Above the average . . . Below the average . . . 1,317,218 1,188,029 580,682 122,853 44.1 10.3 570,401 539,324 43-3 454 With percentage of unemployed: Above the average . . . Below the average . . . 1,031,548 1,473.699 252,453 451 ,082 24.4 30.6 498,881 610,844 484 41.5 Total 2,505,247 703,535 28.1 1,109,725 44-3 TABLE 22. COTTON-MILL OPERATIVES (MALE), FOREIGN-BORN AND UNEMPLOYED, 1900. Areas Total Foreign-born Unemployed Number Per cent Number Per cent With percentage of foreign-born: Above the average . . . Below the average . . . 65,984 59,031 46,009 1,982 69.7 34 7,725 8,551 11.7 14-5 Total 125,015 47.991 384 16,276 13-0 With percentage of unemployed: 1 Above the average . . . Below the average . . . 52,882 7L7I9 10,479 37499 19.8 52-3 8,380 7,842 15.6 9-1 Total 124,601 47,978 38-5 16,222 13-0 1 Exclusive of Kentucky where the percentage of unemployed is equal to the average. Unemployment 137 difference is negligible. Evidently conditions of employ- ment of unskilled laborers are everywhere such that well- nigh one half of them, whether native or foreign-born, have no steady work and lose a part of their time during the year in changing from one situation to another. If the arrange- ment of the States is reversed and they are grouped into two areas according to whether the percentage of unemploy- ment is above or below the average for the United States as a whole, it appears that in the area with the higher ratio of unemployment the percentage of foreign-born laborers is lower. The same relation is disclosed by Table 22 with regard to male cotton-mill operatives. In the area with 70 per cent of foreign-born operatives the percentage of unemployed is slightly less than in the area where 96 per cent of all operatives are of native birth. Reversing the arrangement we find again that in the area with the higher ratio of unemployment only one fifth of all operative are foreign- born, whereas, in the area with the lower ratio of unemploy- ment over one half of the operative force are immigrants. In other words, immigrants, as a rule, are not attracted to the cotton mills of those States where opportunities for steady employment are less favorable. The preceding analysis justifies the conclusion that there is no causal connection between unemployment and immi- gration, the ratio of unemployment within the same occupa- tion being substantially the same in areas with a large immigrant population and with practically none at all. The preceding conclusions have been derived from an inquiry into the conditions of employment for one census year. We shall next examine whether there is any connec- tion between immigration and unemployment compared for a series of years. The Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics has collected annual statistics of the greatest and the least number of wage-earners employed in factories since the middle of the 8o's. Table 23 shows the variation of the ratio of unemployment for twenty years from 1888 138 Immigration and Labor to 1908. The standard of comparison is the same as before, viz., the difference between the greatest and the least number employed. 1 TABLE 23. RATIO OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN MASSACHUSETTS, 1888-1908* Year Percent Year Per cent Year Per cent 1888 23 1895 26 1902 23 1889 23 I8 9 6 33 1903 25 1890 22 1897 28 1904 26 1891 22 1898 30 1905 23 1892 23 1899 26 1906 29 1893 36 I90O 27 1907 25 1894 33 1901 25 1908 33 The years 1893, 1894, an d I 9 8 show the effects of indus- trial crises, and the year 1896 those of the unsettled business situation produced by the free silver agitation. With those exceptions the variation of the ratio of unemployment from year to year is small. The ratio is lower for the seven years of the present century characterized by heavy immi- gration than for the preceding decade when immigration was small. The relation between unemployment and immigration is shown graphically in Diagram IX. 3 It is clearly seen that with increasing immigration unemploy- 1 The returns are not complete, especially for the earlier years; a comparison of the numbers employed would therefore be misleading. Nevertheless, the numbers reported are so large that the percentage of unemployment could not be materially varied by the addition of the missing figures. The inquiries of the Bureau call for the number em- ployed during the current and the preceding year. As a result the figures for the previous year published in every annual report are more complete than those published the year before. A comparison of the percentage of unemployment for each year computed from the numbers published in two consecutive reports shows that the variations do not exceed a fraction of I per cent. In Table 23 fractions of i per cent have been omitted. a See Appendix, Table VIII. 3 See Appendix, Table IX. Unemployment 139 ment decreases, and with declining-immigration unemploy- ment increases. The tendency disclosed by this diagram DIAGRAM IX 00 n.LL,8T oicffiT ,|.Of .q-JI.-tV' * .woiUuM^oH..^^!** 1 ^. AY i and Eastern Europe was negligible^ only 12,000 additional American workmen found employment in thearon and steel industry, or one man to every six who had been employed in 1880; during the period 1890-1900, on -the: other hand, Racial Stratification 159 when immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe began to come in, the number of native employees of every nativity more than doubled. For every one additional American workman engaged in 1880-1890, eight new American work- men were added to the labor forces in 1890-1900, and there was still room for immigrants. TABLE 32. NUMBER OF IRON AND STEEL WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES, BY RACE AND NATIVITY (THOUSANDS), l88o, 1890, AND lucres se Race and Natirity 1880 1890 1900 1880-1890 1890-1900 Native-born, total 7-7 8^ 184 12 White, total n 70 172 yy Q1 Native parents . . . (*> 4.C Q4, 12 yo AQ W -14. 78 Vy AA. Colored (*) 6 12 6 Foreign-born, total 4.2 c8 lO'l 1*6 AC Eastern and Southern Europe . 24. 21 All other countries 42 55 79 13 24 Grand total lie 14.1 287 28 Id.4. (*) Not reported. As stated above, an increase of the total number of native workmen in the United States does not preclude the possi- bility of local displacements of native workmen by immi- grants. As an actual fact, however, no evidence of such displacements can be discovered by a comparison of the distribution of iron and steel workers by States in 1890 and 1900. In two States only the census returns for 1900 showed a decrease of native white iron and steel workers since 1890, viz., in Montana 100 men, and Nebraska 300 men; total, 400 men. Neither of these States holds an important place in the iron and steel industry. Both 1 Compiled from the Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, pp. 21-22, Tables 14 and 15, and vol. I, pp. 784, 785, Table 4. i6o Immigration and Labor States show a general decline of the number of iron and steel workers from 1890 to 1900, viz., Montana from 600 to 300 and Nebraska from 1000 to 500. This decline affected foreign-born as well as native workers. Alabama alone shows a displacement of the majority of colored iron and steel workers (1300 out of a total of 1700) by immigrants. But while the aggregate decrease of the number of native white and colored workers through racial displacement and other causes did not exceed 1700 men in three States, the total increase of the number of native-born iron and steel workers in the United States was as high as 99,000, dis- tributed over all important iron- and steel-producing States. 1 We may go one step further, following the lead of the Immigration Commission into four of the principal centers of the iron and steel industry, but we shall look in vain for evidence of "racial displacement." The results of the comparison are presented in Table 33. TABLE 33. INCREASE OF THE NUMBER OF IRON AND STEEL WORKERS IN THE PRIN- CIPAL CITIES OF THE MIDDLE WEST BY RACE AND NATIVITY, City Native-born Foreign white Grand total White Colored Total Native parents Foreign parents Chicago, Illinois. . . Milwaukee, Wis- 404 110 222 83 1522 1002 1031 152 3707 21 I 39 I 1947 III3 1292 236 1166 1324 2377 249 6113 2437 3669 485 Cleveland,Ohio... Toledo, Ohio Total for the 4 cities SlQ 62 4588 8116 12,704 1 XII. Census, Occupations, Table 41, pp. 220-423; XI. Census, Population, Part II., pp. 530-627. a Computed from Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, p. 9, Tables 559 and 560. Racial Stratification 161 In every one of the four cities chosen for comparison by the Commission we find an actual increase in the number of native workers of native and foreign parentage, white and colored. Of course, this fact does not mean that every individual worker of old American stock who had been employed in the iron and steel mills of Chicago or Cleveland in 1 890 was holding his old place in 1900. Some surely have left the mills and gone to other occupations, while their particular places may have been filled by immigrants, which gives occasion to old-timers to speak in a reminiscent mood of "racial displacement." But the scientific inves- tigator must look beyond individual life stories to the movements of population as reflected in great numbers. The effect of immigration upon the distribution of the native- and foreign-born labor forces is shown in Table 34 next following, compiled from material collected by the Immigration Commission. " In this table skilled laborers are arbitrarily considered to be those who are receiving more than $1.45 per day (i4j/ cents per hour), and unskilled laborers those receiv- ing $1.45 or less per day. The classification is made upon the basis of the wage-scale of the steel company, which provides for a maximum payment of $1.45 for a day of ten hours to unskilled or common laborers." The effect of immigration upon the distribution of the labor forces in the iron and steel industry is apparent from the following table; all but one tenth of the native and Northern and Western European workmen have been shifted to skilled occupations, while nine tenths of all unskilled positions have been filled by new immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. "The change is sometimes described as a forcing out of the American and Americanized foreign employees. That is hardly accurate, however," says the Immigration Commission, "for the 162 Immigration and Labor TABLE 34. NUMBER AND PER CENT OF SKILLED AND UNSKILLED LABORERS IN ONE IRON AND STEEL CONCERN, 1907. r Nationality Number Per cent of total for each national group Total Skilled Unskilled Skilled Unskilled Native white: Foreign- born: From Northern and Western Europe 5257 27 31 4 $ 841 38 731 2434 1371 1391 964 3471 6929 4678 27 30 55 1530 395 346 743 9 l 280 126 84 5 3126 598 579 i 4 157 45 63 3 5 2154 1245 1307 959 345 6331 89.0 1 00.0 96.8 93-2 90.7 89.8 89.6 88.3 18.4 i3-i II-5 9.2 6.0 5 90.1 8.6 II.O o.o i:I 9-3 IO.2 IO.4 II.7 81.6 86.9 88.5 90.8 94.0 95-5 9-9 91.4 Scotch. . . Swedish Welsh English Irish From Southern and Eastern Europe: Bohemian. . . . Magyar Slovak Polish Croatian Italian. Recapitulation: From Northern and Western Europe From Southern and Eastern Europe Total white... 15,657 8402 7253 53-8 46.2 1 Compiled from the Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, p. 350, Table 252. Racial Stratification 163 immigrant does not appear to underbid the American, or at the present time to be even competing with him in any serious way for the better-paid positions. " x In reality, the "racial displacement" has manifested itself in that a part of the earlier employees who remained in the industries in which they were employed before the advent of the Southern and Eastern European, have been able, because of the demand growing out of the general industrial expansion, to rise to more skilled and responsible executive and technical positions which required employees of training and experience . . . The same tendency asserts itself in the distribution of employees according to race in bituminous coal mines, where all occupations of a higher grade are filled by native Americans or older immigrants and their children, while the Southern and Eastern Europeans are confined to pick mining and unskilled and common labor. The same situation exists in other branches of manufacturing enterprise. 3 This racial distribution of the operating forces has developed a deep social tendency which constitutes the main distinction between American and European labor conditions. It is pretty generally accepted by European economists, nowadays, that concentration of industry has reduced the ratio of proprietors to wage-earners and thereby diminished the probability of a wage-earner working his way up to the status of a proprietor; at the same time the introduction of machinery has reduced the relative number of skilled mechanics to a minority of the operating force, leaving to the mass of unskilled laborers few opportunities for advancement on the scale of occupations. As a result, the average European laborer has come to regard his place in the industrial system as fixed. Such has not been the attitude of the American wage-earner. Though the intro- duction of machinery has had the tendency in the United States, as in Europe, to reduce the relative number of skilled mechanics, yet the rapid pace of industrial expansion has increased the number of skilled and supervisory positions r Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, p. 583. 3 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 195, 196. 164 Immigration and Labor so fast that all but "the thriftless, unprogressive elements of the original operating forces " * have had the opportunity to advance on the scale of occupations. The few examples of "captains of industry" who have risen from the ranks of labor will inspire only the most optimistic. But the presence of great numbers of commonplace American work- men who started at the bottom and have advanced to better paid positions in the mills has kept up in the average American wage-earner the ambition to rise individually. A good illustration of these tendencies is furnished by the statistics of the iron and steel industry. Of the 15,657 white iron and steel workers employed in all plants of Industrial Concern No. I in 1907, about one half were American and Americanized skilled men. (See Table 34 above.) Looking back to the time before the advent of the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, we shall find that the oppor- tunity for all of the original operating forces to advance to skilled positions was conditioned upon the concern doubling its force within the period of working efficiency of one generation. It has been shown that the total number employed in the iron and steel industry of the United States doubled from 1890 to 1900. It is easy to calculate what the opportunities of the "English-speaking" 2 wage-earners 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. tit., p. 194. 3 The Immigration Commission has adopted the race classification popularly used in mill towns and mining camps. This classification is thus explained by Mr. Fitch: "By the Eastern European immigration the labor force has been cleft horizontally into two great divisions. The upper stratum includes what is known in mill parlance as the 'English-speaking men'; the lower contains the 'Hunkies' or 'Ginnies.' Or, if you prefer, the former are the 'white men,' the latter the 'for- eigners.' An 'English-speaking' man may be neither native Ameri- can, nor English, nor Irish. He may be one of these, or he may be German, Scandinavian, or Dutch. It is sufficient if the land of his birth be somewhere west of the Russian^ Empire or north of Austria- Hungary. A 'Hunky' is not necessarily a Hungarian. He may belong to any of the Slavic races. 'Ginny' seems to include all the ' Hunkies ' with the Italians thrown in." The Pittsburgh Survey: The Steel Workers, pp. 147-148. Racial Stratification 165 would have been, had the rate of expansion during that decade been as slow as in 1880-1890. Of the total number employed by Concern No. I, 8728 were Americans or older immigrants; the others belonged to the new immigrant races. Had the concern progressed at the 1880-1890 rate, the force would have been increased by one fourth, approxi- mately to 11,000. Only one half of this number, i. e., 5500, could have been given skilled employment, while the other 2304 of the 7804 English-speaking workmen who were so employed in 1907 would have had to content themselves with unskilled work. In other words, a slower expansion of the industry recommended by the Immigration Commission 1 would have deprived more than thirty per cent of the "English-speaking" workmen of opportunities for advancement. Their standard of living would neces- sarily have remained that of unskilled laborers. It is only because the new immigration has furnished the class of unskilled laborers that the native workmen and older immigrants have been raised to the plane of an aristocracy of labor. This evolution must not be lost sight of in the discussion of "racial displacement." That the statistics of iron and steel workers show an increase of 49,000 native-born of native parentage from 1890 to 1900, does not mean that the same individuals were employed in 1900 as ten years before. Some surely have advanced on the scale of occupations and others succeeded them in the mills, still the figures do not disclose the change of individuals. But when English-speaking workers of foreign birth are classified separately, the shifting of a number of Englishmen, Welshmen, and Irishmen to other, more remunerative pursuits, will manifest itself in a corre- sponding reduction of their numbers employed in the iron and steel industry, unless there have been new immigrants of the same nationalities to take their places. This may be observed in many industries. It has been shown that actual displacement of native- by foreign-born wage-earners 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 45. 166 Immigration and Labor is exceptional and negligible. But there has been a decrea & of the number of English, Welsh, and Irish workers in certain occupations, simultaneously with an increase of the number of recent immigrants and native American workers in the same occupations. Upon a superficial glance this coinci- dence might be interpreted as the forcing out of Amer icanized workers by immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe with a lower standard of living. Such an interpretation would not harmonize with the fact that new native workers of native parentage, presum- ably with as high a standard of living as the Irish, have entered the industry in large numbers. A comparative study of the distribution of the foreign-born workers by country of birth and occupation will bring out the real tendencies of the industrial readjustment produced by immigration. We find in the first place, that the total number of English, Welsh, Irish, and German male breadwinners in the United States decreased from 1890 to 1900 as follows: TABLE 35. NUMBER OF ENGLISH, WELSH, IRISH, AND GERMAN MALE BREADWINNERS (THOUSANDS), 1890 and 1900. x Nationality Number Decrease 1890-1900 1890 1900 Number Per cent English and Welsh. . . Irish 487 80 5 1338 439 7M 1276 48 91 62 9-9 II-3 4.6 It must be borne in mind that the number of foreign-born can increase only by immigration, since their children born in this country are classified as native. Had there been no immigration, the four nationalities named should have lost 1 See Appendix, Table XI. Racial Stratification 167 by death from 1890 to 1900 about 20 per cent of their numbers. 1 The actual per cent of decrease indicates that the net immigration of the English and Welsh, Irish, and Germans must have been equal respectively to about 10 per cent, 9 per cent, and 15 per cent of their numbers in 1890. In other words, there was no " displacement" of those nationalities by the races of the new immigration. In the next place, the reduction in numbers affected only certain occupations, while others showed an increase. Among the English and Welsh, the latter class comprised the following occupations: manufacturers, with an increase of 5000; agents and salesmen, with an increase of 3900; and professional men, with an increase of 2500. All other occupations showed a decrease; the greatest numerical decrease was found among the farmers, viz. 14,500 men, or 20 per cent, which was somewhat in excess of the death roll for the ten-year period. 2 Apparently, no new farmers came from England and Wales to fill the places of their countrymen who were carried off by death. This fact, obviously, had nothing to do with the "new immigration," since the "undesirable aliens from South- ern and Eastern Europe" kept away from the farming sections and left the field open for English and Welsh immigrants. The tendency characterizing the readjustment which took place in the occupational field is brought out in the following comparative statement of selected occupations which exhibited a marked divergence, one way or the other, between the percentage of decrease of the number employed and the occupational death-rate : 1 The annual death-rate among the foreign-born, according to the census of 1900, varied from 19 to 20.6 per 1000. XII. Census, Vital Statistics, Part I., p. xc. a The annual death-rate for farmers and farm laborers according to the XII. Census was 17.6 per 1000. XII. Census, Vital Statistics, Part I., p. 209. 168 Immigration and Labor TABLE 36. SHIFTING OF ENGLISH AND WELSH MALE BREADWINNERS IN SELECTED OCCUPATIONS, 1 890-1900. Selected occupations. Per cent ratio to total engaged in each occupation. Aggregate decrease Loss by death Net accretion (+) ordefection( ) Bookkeepers, accountants, and -0.6 -8.3 -2.8 -17.6 20.8 -39.5 -13.6 16.4 io.5 a -8.8 -9.6 -H.8 + 13.0 +8.1 +77 -8.8 II.2 -277 Retail merchants Machinists and blacksmiths Textile mill operatives Miners and quarrymen Tailors The preceding table indicates that while the English and Welsh were leaving the mines, the textile mills, and the tailor shops, their numbers were increasing in some of the better paid skilled trades and in mercantile pursuits. The tendency among the Irish was substantially the same as among the English and Welsh. There were 5000 more manufacturers in 1900 than in 1890; 4700 more agents and salesmen, and 500 more professional men. All other speci- fied occupations showed a decrease. The greatest decrease, both numerical and relative, appeared among farmers, viz., 26,000, or 28 per cent, which was much in excess of the loss by death. It is evident not only that the soil had no attraction for the recent Irish immigrants, but that it could not hold the older Irish farmers who must have given up farming for other pursuits. The direction in which the Irish shifted within non-agricultural pursuits is indicated in Table 37 next below: 1 See Appendix, Table XI. 'The death-rate for 1900 among machinists was 10.5 and among blacksmiths 18.3 per 1000. (Vital Statistics, loc. tit.) In order to make the estimates in this table more conservative, the lower rate has been selected. Racial Stratification 169 TABLE 37. SHIFTING OF IRISH MALE BREADWINNERS IN SELBCTBD~OCCUPATIONS, 1890-1900.* Selected occupations Per cent ratio to total engaged in each occupation Aggregate decrease Loss by death Net accretion ( -f ) or defection( ) Bookkeepers, accountants, and clerks 0.0 -2.3 -10.3 -I4-5 18.0 -25.5 -34-5 -13.6 -lo.s 1 17.0' 10.8 -9.6 -8.8 -II.8 + I3-6 +8.2 4-6.7 = 3 4 -157 -22.7 Machinists and blacksmiths . . Building trades Steam railroad employees Miners and quanymen Textile mill operatives Tailors Simultaneously with the movement of the Irish from the mines, the textile mills, the tailor shops and, presumably, from the lower grades of the railroad service, their number increased in the skilled trades and in clerical pursuits. The occupational changes among the Germans display the same tendencies as have been traced among the English- speaking races, with some variation of detail. The census returns for 1900 record an increase since 1890 in the follow- ing occupations : manufacturers, 7000 ; agents and salesmen, 1 1 ,000; professional men, 2000 ; machinists and blacksmiths, 3000. City laborers, farm laborers, and all other specified occupations show a numerical decrease. In some of the latter, however, the loss by death was partly offset by accretions from the same nationality, while in others actual defections added to the natural decrease by death. The comparative statistics for both classes of occupations are presented in the following table: 1 See footnotes to Table 36. 2 The death-rate for masons in 1900 was 19.9 per 1000; for carpenters and joiners 17.2; for plasterers and whitewashes 17.0. (Vital Statis- tics, loc. cit.) 170 Immigration and Labor TABLE 38. SHIFTING OF GERMAN MALE BREADWINNERS IN SELECTED OCCUPATIONS 1 890-1 900. x Selected occupations Per cent ratio to total engaged in each occupation Aggregate decrease Loss by death Net accretion(+) or defection ( - ) Farmers -6.7 ~4-5 -12.5 i.o 22.O -22.6 -17.6 16.4 -17.0 -9.6 n.o - 8.8 + 10.9 + II.9 +4-5 +8.6 IO.2 -13.8 Building trades Miners and quarrymen Tailors Textile mill operatives Unlike the English, Welsh, and Irish, the Germans, during the last decade of the nineteenth century, show accretions among the farmers, on the one hand, and among the miners and quarrymen, on the other. Defections from textile mills and tailor shops are paralleled by increases among retail merchants and in the building trades. The ultimate effect of immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe upon the readjustment of the various races of foreign-born breadwinners on the scale of occupations appears from the table on page 171. The earlier immigrants have worked their way upward, leaving the coarse grades of labor to later immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. It will be observed that the natives of Austria-Hungary furnish a strikingly high proportion of mine, mill, and factory workers compared with the Germans and Irish. The Poles and Italians furnish a proportion of common laborers higher than the Irish and much higher than the Germans and the British. On the other hand, one fifth of the Germans and Swedes are farmers, whereas the percentage of farmers among the natives of Poland and Austria is very small, and among the Hun- garians and Italians it is negligible. The races of the "old 1 See footnotes to Table 36. Racial Stratification 171 immigration " likewise show higher percentages of skilled mechanics and of persons engaged in business and the professions. TABLE 39. PRINCIPAL NATIONALITIES OF MALE BREADWINNERS CLASSIFIED BY OCCUPATION GROUPS (PER CENT ), 1900. l Nationality Farmers, planters, and overseers Business, pro- fessional and clerical pur- suits* Skilled trades* Mine, mill, and factory workers* Laborers (not on farms) a 1 o 3 1 Scotch. . 12 7 18 7 16 5 English and Welsh... Irish . . . I3.I Q d. M.O./ 177 12 I i*Vd 13-2 Q 1 J 3-4 18.0 Q 7 7 6. 4 33- 31-6 7 Q ~ IOO Germans 2O 7 re -i y-o iii 8.7 ft Q 22.3 TO 2 30.2 .je a Swedes 2O.Q 7.7 I -I C u.y IO Q 12 8 35- *d 2 IOO Poles . c 7 8 7 5T 21 2 2Q I 28 2 IOO Italians . . 1.6 10 2 * 4<7 ,}.<: I/I ^ ^y.i 3-7 2 n groups I II III IV V Total Both Sexes: Native Foreign-born +79-9 +57-3 -I7-3 -5-8 -7.7 II. I -2.8 +3-9 + 1.0 -0.4 +53-1 +43-9 Total Male: Native Foreign-born + 137-2 +48.9 +4I-5 -23.1 -12.8 -3-1 -18.8 -7.7 II. I + 1.1 -2.7 +3-8 +0.6 +0.5 -0.4 +97.0 +26.2 +30-7 Total Female: Native +90.4 -{-31.0 -15-9 4.5 -18.8 + 1.1 O.I +0.1 +0.5 +56.9 +26.9 Foreign-born + 15-8 -2.7 +0.1 o.o + 13-2 Total +46.8 7.2 +O.O +0.5 +40.1 The increase of the native-born is greatest where the increase of the foreign-born is greatest. On the contrary a substantial decrease of native-born breadwinners is found in the second group of occupations where the number of 1 Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 34, pp. 154 /., and Table 41, pp. 300-305. Census of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1905, vol. ii., Occupations, Table I., pp. 9-117. Racial Stratification foreign-born likewise shows a large decrease. The gains of the foreign-born at the expense of the native and vice-versa are insignificant. The decrease of native breadwinners in all occupations aggregated 27,800 persons, but it was offset by a net increase of 80,900 in all other classes of manual labor and clerical occupations, that is to say the loss of one position was compensated by the gain of three. No account is taken here of the increase of native-born breadwinners in business and professional service. As stated above, it is uncertain whether the decrease of the number of laborers was due to industrial changes or to the whims of statistical classification. The details for all other occupations showing a decrease of the number of native breadwinners are given in Table 42. TABLE 42. SPECIFIED OCCUPATIONS IN MASSACHUSETTS WITH A DECREASING NUM- BER OF NATIVE BREADWINNERS, CLASSIFIED BY SEX AND NATIVITY, 1 900-1 905. * Occupations Decrease (Thousands) Occupations Decrease (Thou- sands) GROUP II Native Foreign- born GROUP IV NATIVE Males: Agricultural laborers. . . Butchers 2.5 li 2.2 I.O 3.0 12.8 1.8 I.S 1.2 4-5 .3 .1 4 I.O .2 I.I 3-1 1.5 .9 .2 2.6 Males. Hucksters and peddlers Boatmen and sailors . . . Engineers and firemen . . Porters and helpers Tin plate ana tinware .6 4 3 3 .2 .2 '.6 2.7 I 2.8 Carpenters and joiners. Gold and silver workers Packers and shippers . . All others 2 Barbers and hairdressers Miners and quarrymen. All other" 3 Total Females: Housekeepers and stewardesses Total Females: Agricultural laborers, hucksters.and peddlers Servants and waitresses Total Both sexes 17-3 5.7 Both sexes 1 See footnote to Table 41. * Includes bakers, blacksmiths, brick and "tile makers, confectioners, coopers, gunsmiths, locksmiths and bell hangers, harness and saddle 176 Immigration and Labor As appears from the preceding table, the only possible 4 'displacement" of native- by foreign-born did not exceed 2800 breadwinners in five years, which was less than 3 per cent of the increase of native-born in all occupations exclusive of business and professional service. The total number of immigrant breadwinners who gave Massachusetts as their destination in 1901-1905 reached 220,000 persons of both sexes. x Assuming that 2800 native hucksters and peddlers, boatmen, and sailors, etc., were virtually dis- placed by the immigrants, we find that the measure of "displacement" was equal to one native for every seventy- eight immigrants. These results disclose no material change in the racial make-up of the industrial forces during the first five years of the present century; what was true in 1900 remained so as late as 1905. The immigrants did not "crowd" the native wage-earners, but were absorbed in those occupations where native workers found employment in increasing numbers. Actual "displacement" was a negligible quantity. makers and repairers, hostlers, marble and stone cutters, masons (brick and stone), meat and fruit canners, packers, etc., millers, shirt, collar and cuff makers, stewards, and wheelwrights. 3 Includes brassworkers, cabinet makers, candle, soap, and tallow makers, copper workers, engravers, paper hangers, rope and cordage factory operatives, sail, awning, and tent makers, tobacco and cigar operatives, and upholsterers. 1 Annual Reports of the Commissioner-General of Immigration: 1901, p. 17, Table VIII.; 1902, p. 29, Table IX.; 1903, p. 32, Table IX.; 1904, p. 30, Table IX.; 1905, p. 34, Table IX. CHAPTER VIII EMIGRATION FROM NORTHERN AND WESTERN EUROPE A. Introductory HTHE great influx of Italian, Slav, and Jewish immigrants 1 since 1890 coincides with a decrease of immigration from Northern and Western Europe. This coincidence has been generally accepted as proof that immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe has checked the current of "more desirable*' immigration from Northern and Western Europe. This assertion has been clothed in the scientific garb of "the Gresham law of immigration"; bad immigra- tion, it is said, tends to drive out good immigration. The cum hoc, ergo propter hoc method of reasoning has scarcely ever appeared so undisguised as in this newly discovered "law." No attempt has been made to inquire into the conditions of the countries from which the "old immigra- tion" was drawn, with a view to ascertaining, if possible, whether there were any causes tending to check emigration from those countries. It has been shown in Chapter TV. that in the long run immigration bears an almost constant relation to the popu- lation of the United States. Inasmuch, however, as the latter increases faster than the population of Europe, especially that of the emigration countries, the rate of emigration from those countries must increase much faster than their population in order to supply the industries of the United States with the number of immigrants they can employ. Yet the sources of emigration are not unlimited. 178 Immigration and Labor We may speak, metaphorically, of a Slav "invasion," but such figures of speech merely obscure the real nature of present-day phenomena. The Norman invaders of a thou- sand years ago financed their expeditions by robbing the peaceable population on their way. All they needed was the spirit of adventure. To-day that spirit alone will not carry their descendants across the ocean. The funds for emigration must be raised by the emigrants themselves, or by their relatives and friends. The volume of emigration from a given country can, therefore, not increase beyond a certain limit set by the size of its population. When that point is reached, further industrial expansion in the United States must draw upon the labor supply of other countries. During the ten-year period 1881-1890 the countries of Northern and Western Europe furnished 72 per cent of the total immigration to the United States. x This period included the years of the maximum immigration from Germany and the Scandinavian countries and of the great- est immigration from the United Kingdom since the Irish famine of the '40*8 of the past century. To maintain the same ratio to the total immigration of the past decade, 1901-1910, the countries of Northern and Western Europe should have furnished six and one third million immigrants, i. e., two thirds more than in 1881-1890. In order to replace the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe that were absorbed by the industrial expansion of the past decade, immigration from Northern and Western Europe should have risen 117 per cent above the highest water-mark reached in 1881-1890. During the same period the population of Ireland de- creased 14 per cent, and the population of the other coun- tries of Northern and Western Europe increased from 12.5 to 25.2 per cent. 2 Unless-we allow ourselves to be 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, Table 6, pp. 61-63. *The rates of increase for each of the principal countries were as follows: From Northern and Western Europe 179 carried away by imagination, does past experience warrant the assumption that the volume of immigration from those countries could have so far outrun the increase of their population? The total immigration from Ireland to the United States for 1891-1900 was equal to 655,000 persons. 1 An increase of 117 per cent would have brought up this figure to 1,400,- ooo (in round numbers), i. e., to 31 per cent of the popula- tion of Ireland at the census of 1901.* Such a rate of depopulation was not reached even in the years of the Irish famine. 3 It is needless to repeat this calculation for Great Britain and the Scandinavian countries. It could be shown by a simple computation that, in order to replace the "new immigration" emigration from those countries should have risen to the Irish level. Their recent economic develop- ment, on the contrary, as will next be shown, has had a decided tendency to check emigration. Per cent England and Wales 1881-1901 25.2 Scotland 1881-1901 19.7 Germany 1880-1900 24.6 Denmark 1881-1900 244 Norway 1875-1900 23.1 Sweden 1880-1900 12.5 (Computed from Statesman's Year Book, 1910, pp. 13, 17; and British Statistical Abstract of the Principal and Other Foreign Countries, No. 16, p. 8; No. 35, pp. 8, 10.) 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, Table 9, pp. 89-92. 2 Statistical Abstract for the United Kingdom, Table 114, p. 361. 3 The lowest numerical and relative decrease was in 1871-1881, viz., 237,541 persons, equivalent to 4.4 per cent. The total emigration during the same period was 618,650. The natural increase of popula- tion through the excess of births over deaths was accordingly 381,109 persons, i. e., 7 per cent of the population at the census of 1878. Allowing the same rate for the natural increase of the population of Ireland in 1901-1910, we obtain 24 per cent as the rate of decrease in our hypothetical case, as against 19.8 per cent for the decade 1841-1851 comprising the years of the great Irish famine. (The figures are taken from the Statistical Abstract for the United Kingdom, No. 56, p. 361, Table 114.) i8o Immigration and Labor B. Germany In the closing years of the nineteenth century Germany ceased to be a country of emigration, and became a country of immigration. This transformation is seen from the fol- lowing table: TABLE 43. FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION OF GERMANY, NET EMIGRATION AND NET IMMIGRATION (THOUSANDS). 1 Foreign-born population Year Increase Net emigration ( ) or Number net immigration ( +) Total Annual average 1880 419 1885 433 H 3 980 1890 513 80 16 -331 1895 ... -449 I9OO 830 317 32 + 94 1905 + 52 The increase of the foreign-born population of Germany during the years 1 900-1 907 averaged 79,000 annually. a The annual increase of the foreign-born population of the United States in 1870-1880 averaged 107,000, and in 1890-1900, 109,000. It can be readily seen by comparison that immi- gration to Germany is growing to respectable proportions. Two thirds of the foreign-born male breadwinners are engaged in industrial pursuits. This fact alone would furnish a sufficient explanation of the decline of German immigration to the United States; when there is a call for large masses of immigrant labor, native wage-earners will find a good market at home. 3 It is worthy of note, on the other hand, that Germany 1 Die Statisiik in Deutschland nach ihrem heutigen Stand, I Band (1911), Dr. Herrmann Losch, " Wanderungsstatistik," p. 485. Dr. Friedrich Zahn, " Deutschlands wirtschaftliche Entwickelung," Annalen des Deutschen Reichs, 1910, p. 405. Ibid. See Appendix, Table XII. From Northern and Western Europe 181 draws her immigrant supply from the same sources as the United States. During the twenty years from 1880 to 1900, three fourths of all immigrants to Germany came from Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Italy. 1 Moreover, the Polish or Italian immigrant to the United States comes from a higher social layer than his countryman who goes to Ger- many, the cost of passage from any of these countries to Germany being purely nominal in comparison with the cost of a transatlantic trip. It is evident that the German wage-earner cannot avoid coming in contact with the immi- grant from Southern and Eastern Europe by staying away from the United States. In addition to her permanent foreign-born population Germany has a large floating immigrant labor supply, the so-called "birds of passage," mostly Poles and other Slavs from Russia and Galicia. The latest official data relating to migration from Galicia to Germany place the total number at 26,283 for the year 1899. The movement has considerably grown since that time. Austrian statis- ticians variously estimate the number for the year 1905 at from 60,000 to 100,000. 3 The migration of working men and women from Russian Poland to Germany for temporary employment has grown in the following proportion: TABLE 44* MIGRATION OF WORKERS FROM RUSSIAN POLAND TO GERMANY FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT, 1890-1904.* Year Thousands 1890 17 1900 119 1901 140 1902 136 1903 142 1904 138 1 See Appendix, Table XIII. * Munchener Volkswirtschaftliche Studicn, J. von Trzcinski, "Russisch- Polnische und galizische Wanderarbeiter im Grossherzogtum Posen," p. 44. a Reports of the Warsaw Statistical Committee. Bulletin XXII. t p. 2, 1 82 Immigration and Labor About 95 per cent of the temporary immigrants from Russian Poland find employment as agricultural laborers. 1 But the demand for them is the direct result of the move- ment of Polish peasants from the rural districts of Prussian Poland to the great industrial cities of Germany and particularly to the coal mining districts. In 1898 there were 57,000 foreign-speaking mine workers in Western Germany out of a total of 198,000, i. e., 28.7 per cent, nearly all of whom were Poles from Prussian Poland. 2 According to the latest statistics for the Ruhr district, which produces one half of Germany's coal output, the number of Polish miners has grown to 100,000 out of a total of 350,000. 3 Evidently, there must have been some other cause than reluctance to compete with Polish immi- grants that has " operated to prevent the further coming" of German miners to the bituminous regions of Pennsyl- vania, 4 since they have no alternative but to work with Polish immigrants on either side of the Atlantic. The transformation of Germany from an emigrant- furnishing nation to a country of immigration is the direct result of her recent industrial expansion. Its extent can be gauged by the comparative growth of production of coal and pig iron in Germany and the two other leading indus- trial countries, the United States and Great Britain, as represented graphically in Diagrams XII s and XIII. 6 In coal mining Germany has, in recent years, outrun Great Warsaw, 1906. (In Russian.) General Analysis .of the Statistics of Migration of Workers for Temporary Employment, etc. By K. G. Vobly. * Ibid., p. 21. 3 J. Karski, Die Polnischen Wanderarbeiter, "Die Neue Zeit," 1900- 1901, pp. 722, 723. 3V. Maisky: "The Tragedy of the German Coal Miners," (in Russian) Russkoye Bogatstvo, April, 1912, pp. 35, 47. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 427. s Based upon the Report of the United States Geological Survey, Production of Coal in 1909, p. 60. 6 Figures are taken from The Mineral Industry, 1893, P- 35 1; 1896, p. 334; 1900, p. 395; 1910, p. 381. DIAGRAM xn. Per cent of increase of (lie production of coal in the United States, Germany, and Great Britain, 1890-1909. 5s* ^ DIAGRAM XIII. Production of pig iron in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom, 1880-1910. 183 184 Immigration and Labor Britain. The production of pig iron in Germany increased, within the past twenty years, much faster than in Great Britain; the German rate of growth was not far behind the American. Another index of German industrial progress is furnished by the development of her railway system and freight traffic since 1890. Comparative statistics for Germany and the United States are given in Table 45. TABLE 45. COMPARATIVE GROWTH OF RAILROAD MILEAGE AND FREIGHT TRAFFIC IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES, 1 890-1900. x Country Per cent IB crease Mileage in operation Ton -miles of freight 41.3 n 1 ?.? United States 46.7 18-1.4 The full import of the preceding figures can only be realized if one bears in mind the much smaller area and the greater density of population of Germany, compared with the United States, both factors reducing the distance from mine to mill and from mill to market. The use of mechanical power in the industrial establish- ments of Germany more than doubled within the short space of twelve years, viz., from 3,400,000 in 1895 to 8,800,000 in 1907." 1 Computed from the following sources: Dr. Friedrich Zahn, "Deutsch- lands wirtschaftliche Entwickelung," Annalen des Deutschen Reichs, 1911, No. 3-4, p. 189; Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1910, P- 715. a Zahn, he. cit. t p. 175. , From Northern and Western Europe 185 The effect of the industrial progress of Germany upon the labor market is shown in the comparative increase of the number of breadwinners engaged in trade and manufactures and of the population at large, as shown in Table 46 next following: TABLE 46. PER CENT INCREASE OF THE POPULATION OF GERMANY AND OF THE NUMBER OF BREADWINNERS IN TRADE AND MANUFACTURES, 1882-1907.' Period Population Breadwinners 1882-1895 H-5 39-9 1895-1907 19.2 397 The increased demand for labor in the industrial estab- lishments of Germany resulted in a substantial increase of the rate of wages. " The rate of wages has risen during the recent past . . . more than the price of the necessities of life, showing that the German workingman has shared in the prosperity of the country. " a It is admitted by the German trade-unions that the condition of labor has materially improved. 8 1 Zahn, loc. cit., p. 164. 3 Earl Dean Howard: The Cause and Extent of the Recent Industrial Progress of Germany, p. 118. 3 Zahn, loc. cit., p. 227. If an opinion coming from official sources is preferred, the following quotation from a recent speech by Mr. von Berlepsch, former Prussian Minister of Commerce, will be of interest: "Slowly and by little steps rises the well-being of the general body of the people; and no small number of those classes of the population which thirty years ago obtained a bare subsistence have now made their way into a middle class and enjoy a fairly adequate income. " Howard, loc. cit., p, 181. 1 86 Immigration and Labor The average annual earnings upon which membership dues to the trade-union insurance fund were figured increased from 638 marks in 1890 to 953 marks in 1909, i. e., 50 per cent. The upward tendency of wages is not confined to the skilled trades, but has affected all classes of labor. Un- biased evidence of this fact is furnished by the statistics compiled by local authorities under the provisions of the sick-insurance law, and showing the prevailing rates of wages of day laborers in the large cities. x The rate of increase of the average annual earnings of coal miners appears from the following table: TABLE 47. AVERAGE ANNUAL EARNINGS IN PRUSSIAN COAL MINES, District Number of wage-earners (thousands) 1910 Annual earnings, marks 1890 1910 Per cent of increase Upper Silesia 116 28 335 22 40 6 7 I 735 1,067 878 730 964 974 1,382 1,375 1,089 43-6 32-5 24.8 56.6 49.1 Lower Silesia Dortmund Aix-la-Chapelle Halle At the same time there has been a marked reduction in the number of hours of work per day. 3 Furthermore "there is also less changing of employment and less non-employment in Germany," than in the United States, since, "in most cases the law requires at least a two weeks' notice before the employee can be discharged." 4 All these improvements are in no small degree due to the progress of organization among German wage-earners, which became possible only after the repeal of the anti- Socialist law on October i, 1890.^ Under the operation of 1 Howard, loc. cit., pp. 114-115. Statistical tables on the subject of wages are given on pp. 112-113. _ a Zahn, loc. cit., p. 228. 3 Howard, loc. eit., p. 117. v. / ^f * Ibid., pp. 126-127. From Northern and Western Europe 187 that law, only local trade-unions, without national affilia- tions, had been tolerated, and those, only so long as they confined themselves to mutual benefit and educational objects; by executive order of April n, 1886, strikes of any character were declared to be "revolutionary manifesta- tions." The first national labor convention was held in 1892. It was not until January i, 1900, however, that all laws restricting the right of federating independent local unions were unequivocally repealed. 1 Since that time the membership of labor organizations has progressed by leaps and bounds, leaving behind the older British and American trade-unions, as appears from the following table : TABLE 48. MEMBERSHIP OF TRADE-UNIONS IN GERMANY, 1 890-1900.* Year (Thousands) 1890 . 301 National unions: 1900 932 1901 935 1902 1017 1903 1191 1904 W 1905 1727 1906 2129 1907 2330 1908 2203 1909 2212 1910 2435 Total, including unaffiliated local unions, 1910: Germany 2688 United States and Canada (estimated) 262 5 Great Britain and Ireland 2427 The ratio of organized workers to the total number of wage-earners enumerated in 1907 was estimated at 28 per cent. 3 1 Handwdrterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, vol. iv., pp. 1147-1149. a Statistische Beilage des Correspondenz-Blatt der General-Commission der Gewerkschaften Deutschlands , 1911, No. 6, pp. 161-163; New York Labor Bulletin, No. 48 (September, 1911), P- 4*8. The membership for the United States and Canada seems overestimated. a Handwdrterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, vol. iv., p. 1175. 188 Immigration and Labor A noteworthy development of the German labor move- ment is the progress of organization among female wage- earners, who are, as a rule, unorganized in this country. The efforts of German unions among the women were stimulated, above all altruistic considerations, by recogni- tion of the depressing effect of the competition of unorgan- ized female labor upon the wages of men. The extent to which the women have responded to the efforts of the unions can be measured by the following figures: TABLE 49. ] PROGRESS OF ORGANIZATION AMONG FEMALE WAGE- EARNERS, IN GERMANY, 1895-1910.* Year Number of organized women (thousands) Per cent of total union membership 1895 7 2.7 1000 23 3-3 1905 74 5-7 1906 119 7-1 1007 137 7.3 1908 138 7.6 1009 134 7-3 1910 162 8.0 The assistance rendered by German unions to their members can be measured by the expenditures of the Social- democratic Gewerkschaften, i. e., the national unions affili- ated with the largest and most influential of the German federations of labor. The figures are given in Table 50. The progress of the labor movement in Germany has directly and indirectly stimulated labor legislation, which has resulted in a material improvement of the condition of labor: As a rule [says Dr. Howard], the factories are kept in a much better condition, and have more arrangements for the comfort of the men, 1 Statistische Beilage des Correspondenz-Blatt der General-Commission der Gewerkschaften Deutschlands, 1911, No. 6, pp. 163, 168.' From Northern and Western Europe 189 than in the United States. This is the general opinion of writers who compare the conditions prevailing in the two countries, and it seems to be confirmed by direct observation. The factories usually have good light and air, are clean and orderly. The sanitary arrangements and the facilities for washing and changing clothes are splendid. Most of the factories are provided with lockers for the men, so that they need not leave the place in their working clothes. 1 i TABLE 50. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF THE PRINCIPAL EXPENSES OF THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AFFILIATED WITH THE " GENERAL COMMISSION OF THE TRADE-UNIONS OF GERMANY," 1895-1910. a Object Millions of marks 1895 I90O 1910 Strikes ... 0-3 O.2 0-5 2.7 0.5 I.O 20.4 6.1 11.2 Sick and death benefits and sundry benevolent expenses Germany was the first nation to introduce a system of workingmen's insurance under the control of the govern- ment. "The introduction of insurance laws protecting the workingman against sickness and accidents, and promising him a pension in his old age, has had a tendency to decrease the chances of misfortune in life. " 3 In 1909 there were insured under the provisions of that law over 13,000,000 persons against sickness, over 15,000,000 against old age and invalidity, and nearly 24,000,000 persons against accident, in a total population of 64,000,000 of whom there were less than 19,000,000 wage-earners. 4 The expansion of industry and the resulting improvement of the condition of industrial wage-earners have drawn to the cities and mining sections the whole natural increase of the rural population. 5 1 Howard, loc. cit., pp. 127-128. 3 Ibid., p. 189. 3 Ibid., pp. 124, 131. : g March 31 Is Sg oz 5 .? H II H Australia New Zeal Cape of C Hope and . Si V BJ i i 1 i i! la H 1 1895 6 I 12 I 20 56 56 76 1896 6 I IO 2 19 40 i 41 60 1897 6 4 6 3 19 31 i 32 51 1898 8 4 6 2 2O 29 29 49 1899 I9OO 8 8 8 -6 7 I 2 7 23 39 48 39 48 46 71 1901 7 6 9 3 25 46 i 47 72 1902 1903 15 46 4 4 28 28 3 3 I? 11 i 1 02 147 1904 51 5 i 4 59 67 i 68 127 1905 63 7 3 4 77 6l i 62 139 1906 10 -3 7 105 86 4 90 195 1907 117 14 ~5 5 131 IOO 4 104 235 1908 42 21 -5 i 59 3* i 32 1909 52 25 3 2 82 56 2 58 140 As appears from Diagram XVI, where the same figures are shown graphically, the curves representing net emigra- tion to the United States and to British possessions exhibit a tendency to rise and fall together. From 1898 to 1907 the net immigration to the United States was steadily rising with slight deviations in the years ended March 31, 1901, and 1905, i. e., in the two presidential years. Since the latter year, the immigration countries of the British Empire have drawn and held more immigrants than the United 1 Computed from Statistical Abstract of the United Kingdom, No. 57, PP. 363-364. Tables 117, 118, 119. "Includes 22,719 passengers from 1895 to 1907 whose nationality is not specified. 214 Immigration and Labor States, but the net immigration to the United States also increased. The drop in 1908 affected the net immigration to Canada as much as that to the United States. In 1909 the net immigration to the United States exhibited a greater increase, both absolute and relative, than the net immigra- DlAGRAM XVI. XVI. Net emigration from the United Kingdom by destination, 1895-1909. tion to all British possessions. Obviously, conditions in the United States, notwithstanding immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, compared favorably with those in other immigration countries. Another factor determining the volume of emigration, that must not be lost sight of, is the improvement of living conditions in Great Britain. In the first place, there has From Northern and Western Europe 215 been a decrease in the cost of living. Measuring the cost of living by wholesale prices and taking the Board of Trade index number for 1900 as 100, official estimates put the cost of living in 1878-1887 at 119.5 and in 1898-1907 at 97.8. At the same time the rates of wages have increased. 1 An estimate of the course of average real wages in the second half of the nineteenth century is reproduced in the fol- lowing table: TABLE 66. AVERAGE REAL WAGES IN GREAT BRITAIN, 1850-1900. Year Per Cent 1850 50 i860 55 1870 60 1880 70 1890 84 1895 93 1900 100 During the decade 1850-1859, when immigration from the British Isles to the United States reached its maximum, relative to population, and the decade 1880-1889, when it reached its numerical maximum, the real wages averaged from 50 to 55 per cent and from 70 to 84 per cent, respec- tively, of the wages of 1900. The improvement is sufficient to account for the reduction in the rate of emigration from the United Kingdom. H. Ireland Emigration from Ireland to all countries reached its maximum during the decade ended March 31, 1861, and has since declined. The tide rose again during the '8o's, in the turbulent years of the Irish Land League agitation, and once more during the past decade, but not as high as the water-mark reached in 1852-1861. The figures are given in Table 67 below. 1 Beveridge, loc. cit., p. 9. a Ibid., quoting: A. L. Bowley, National Progress in Wealth and Trade, p. 33. 2i6 Immigration and Labor TABLE 67. ANNUAL AVERAGE EMIGRATION FROM IRELAND, MAY I, 1 85 1, TO MARCH 31, IQOS. s Years ended March 3 x (Thousand*) 1852-1861 115 1862-1871 77 1872-1881 62 1882-1891 77 1892-1901 43 1902-1908 50 There are no accurate statistics showing the distribution of Irish emigrants by destination previous to 1876. The subsequent years 1876-1908 for which such statistics are available may be divided with respect to the racial composi- tion of the immigration to the United States into two periods of nearly equal length; previous to 1891 the races of Northern and Western Europe furnished the bulk of the immigrants, whereas during the more recent period the races of Southern and Eastern Europe became the pre- dominant element among them. The figures are presented in Table 67 on page 216. Two facts are worthy of note in the following compara- tive table: first, that the decline of emigration from Ireland has affected the movement to other countries, as well as to the United States, and second, that the proportion of Irish emigrants destined to the United States during the period of the great influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe was higher than in 1876-1890, when immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was negligible. That the "new immigration" to the United States was not the cause of the decline of Irish emigration is clear from the fact that the decline had set in as early as 1861-1870, at least twenty years before the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe became sufficiently numerous to attract 1 The enumeration of emigrants fronTlrish ports did not commence until May I, 1851. Census of Ireland, 1901, Part II., p. 168, Table 41. Statistical Abstract of the United Kingdom, No. 56, p. 365. From Northern and Western Europe 217 notice. The conclusion suggested by the statistics of Irish emigration is that there must have been forces at work to reduce the number of Irish seeking a better home than their native country. TABLE 68. ANNUAL AVERAGE EMIGRATION FROM IRELAND, BY DESTINATION, I876-I908. 1 To the United States Period To other countries (thousands) Total (thousands) (Thousands) Per cent of total 1876-1890' 69 50 72 19 1891-19083 46 38 83 8 The change in the economic condition of the Irish people since the '8o's may be summed up in the following words of Mr. Dillon: The wretched land system was responsible for most of the misery which the poor suffered. Successive land purchases are gradually restoring the worse than homeless tenants to the land, and each family so restored becomes decently prosperous, because for the first time there is offered a chance to make a living. . . . The helpless, hopeless tenants and the evicted families are being made independent. . . The thousands who have been put in the way of making decent farms and homes have become hopeful and self-reliant instead of despairing. . . . Those families who were struggling against starvation on the rocky hillsides are now cultivating fertile fields. 4 That this is not mere rhetoric a few figures will show. 1 Computed from the following sources: Census of Ireland, i88I, Part II., p. 74; 1891, Part II., p. 74; 1901, Part II., p. 74; 1901, Part II., Table 41, p. 168; Statistical Abstract of the United Kingdom, No. 48, p. 255; No. 56, p. 365; Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, Table 9, pp. 76-92. 3 Calendar years. 3 Total emigration from Ireland for 17^ years, from January i, 1891, to March 31, 1908; immigration to the United States for 17 years from January I, 1891, to December 31, 1908. ^ Hugh Sutherland: Ireland Yesterday and To-day (1909), p. 108. 218 Immigration and Labor Under the operation of the several purchase acts passed since 1885, more than 214,000 tenants have been enabled to buy their land with the assistance of the government. 1 This number is equal to one third of all families enumerated in rural areas at the census of 1901 . 3 Under the provisions of the Wyndham Act of 1903, the government is authorized to expend $800,000,000 in loans to tenants at 3% per cent for the purchase of land, which is to be paid for in 68 J^ years. 3 Furthermore, the rent of the tenants has been substantially reduced by law, to which must be added the creation of a legal interest of a marketable character, together with a chance of further abatements in the future. 4 Other legislation has been enacted for the benefit of agricultural laborers. "County authorities are able to borrow government funds for the erection of decent sani- tary dwellings, which rent for I shilling a week. Nearly 50,000 of these neat cottages have been erected." 5 Another factor which has materially contributed to the improvement of the condition of the Irish farmers has been the co-operative movement which dates from 1889. In 1903 there were more than 800 co-operative societies with an aggregate membership of 80,000 farmers. 6 Perhaps, the most important among these societies are the co-operative agricultural banks, which in the language of Sir Horace Plunkett "perform the apparent miracle of giving sol- vency to a community composed almost entirely of in- solvent individuals." 7 There are more than 200 of these banks which lend money to farmers at 5 or 6 per cent per annum for agricultural improvements. 8 The improvement of the condition of the tenants has * Ibid., p. 114. 3 The Census of Ireland, General Report, Table 49, p. 173. * Sutherland, loc. cit., p. 114. C. F. Bastable: "Some Features of the Economic Movement in Ireland, 1880-1900," Economic Journal, 4901, No. xi., pp. 33, 39. s Sutherland, loc. cit., p. 183. 6 Horace Plunkett : Ireland in the New Century, p. 192. 7 Ibid., p. 195. 8 Ibid., pp. 192, 197* From Northern and Western Europe 219 affected the labor market; there has been a substantial gain in the real wages of farm laborers. 1 The improvement of the living conditions of the Irish people is reflected in the statistics of housing accom- modations. The census of Ireland divides all houses into four classes: "In the lowest of the four classes are com- prised houses built of mud or perishable material, having only one room and window; in the third a better descrip- tion of house, varying from one to four rooms and windows; in the second what might be considered a good farmhouse, having from five to nine rooms and windows; and in the first class all houses of a better description than the preceding." 2 TABLE 69. FAMILIES OCCUPYING EACH CLASS OF INHABITED HOUSES IN RURAL AREAS OF IRELAND, l86l~I9OI.3 Number (thousands) Per cent Census period I II III IV I II III IV Total class class class class class class class class 1861 29 291 471 90 3-3 33-0 53-5 IO.2 IOO 1881 36 309 356 39 4.9 41.7 48.1 54 IOO 1891 4 332 288 20 48.9 42.4 2.9 IOO 1901 41 353 230 9 6.4 55-8 36.4 1.4 IOO While housing conditions in Ireland to-day are still far from ideal, yet they show evidence of very real improve- ment, compared with the days when emigration from Ireland was at its maximum. The number of one-room huts with one window, built of mud or other material of the same class, decreased since 1861 from 90,000 to 9,000. In 1 86 1, there were but one in three houses that might be considered good farm houses; forty years later about the same proportion fell below that definition. 1 Bastable, loc. tit., p. 38. J Census of Ireland, General Report for 1901, p. II. Computed from the Census of Ireland .General Report, Table 49, 220 Immigration and Labor The results of the census of 1911 have as yet not been published. In Mr. Dillon's opinion, "Ireland has made more progress in the last ten years than during the previous two hundred years. " * Is it reasonable to assume that the same rate of emigration from Ireland could be maintained to-day as half a century ago? /. Conclusion To sum up the preceding review of economic conditions in the countries of Northern and Western Europe, it is not because the "new immigration" has had an unfavorable effect upon labor conditions in the United States, but because those countries have become better homes for their citizens, that fewer of them are nowadays coming to the United States. If this country is to have immigration, it will have to come from other sources. To be sure, it may be argued that this country has no further need of immigration in general and can therefore dispense with immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. Be it as it may, it is a fallacy to assume that they could be replaced by potential immigration from Northern and Western Europe. 1 Sutherland, loc. cit. t p. 108. CHAPTER IX RACE SUICIDE IT cannot be seriously disputed that the great immigration of recent years has come in response to a demand for labor in the United States. Industrial progress and im- provement of the condition of the wage-earners and farmers in the countries of Northern and Western Europe rendered the supply of immigrant labor from those sources inadequate. Without the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, the rapid industrial expansion of the past decade would have been impossible. But it seems to the Immigra- tion Commission, that "there is ground for argument or speculation" that "less immigration of a character tending to keep down wages and working conditions might have been attended by a larger natural increase among the native- born portion of the population." 1 This theory, originated by Gen. Francis A. Walker, until lately held unchallenged the field of economic and sociologi- cal discussion. General Walker believed that immigration had caused a decline in the birth-rate of the native American population : The American shrank from the industrial competition thus thrust upon him. He was unwilling himself to engage in the lowest kind of day-labor with these new elements of the population; he was even more unwilling to bring sons and daughters into the world to enter into that competition. Foreign immigration into this country has . . . amounted not to a re-enforcement of our population, but to a replacement of native by foreign stock. ... If the foreigners had not come, the native element would long have filled the places the foreigners usurped. 3 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, p. 494. 'Francis A. Walker: Discussions in Economics and Statistics, pp. 432-425. Ml 222 Immigration and Labor In proof of his theory, General Walker maintained that the decline of the birth-rate among Americans began at the very time when foreign immigration first assumed considerable proportions; it showed itself first and in the highest degree in those regions, in those States, and in the very counties into which the foreigners most largely entered. It proceeded for a long time in such a way as absolutely to offset the foreign arrivals, so that in 1850, in spite of the incoming of two and a half millions of foreigners during thirty years, our population differed by less than ten thousand from the population which would have existed, according to the previous rate of increase, without re-enforcement from abroad. These three facts . . . constitute a statistical demonstration such as is rarely attained in regard to the operation of any social or economic force. 1 General Walker's statistical demonstration consisted in a comparison of the census figures from 1820 to 1890 with a calculation made by Elkanah Watson in 1815 on the basis of the increase of population from 1790 to 1810. The census figures for 1820-1850 closely coincided with Watson's estimates. 2 Yet, whereas prior to 1820 immigration was insignificant, from 1820 to 1850, 2,500,000 foreigners were added to the population of the United States without in- creasing it to any appreciable degree. The inference seemed to be incontrovertible that the development of the natural resources of the United States made provision for a fixed population at every census, so that the two-and-a-half million foreigners merely usurped the places of as many unborn Americans. At every subsequent census Watson's calculations proved to be overestimated, viz.: in 1860 by over 300,000, in 1870 by 3,770,000, in 1880 by more than 1 Walker, loc. cit., p. 441. * Ibid., pp. 120-122: Year Watson's estimates The census Difference 1820 1830 1840 1850 9.625,734 12,833,645 17,116,526 23,185,368 9,633,822 I2,866,O2O 17.069,453 23,191,876 -f 8,088 +32.375 -47.073 + 6,508 Race Suicide 223 six millions, and in 1890 by over fourteen millions. Chief among the social and economic causes of this shortage compared with Watson's calculation was, according to General Walker, "the access of vast hordes of foreign immigrants bringing with them a standard of living at which our own people revolted. " x The revolt assumed the form of a strike of American parents against child-bearing. This conclusion illustrates in a striking manner the effect of a preconceived idea upon the reasoning ability of a scientific writer. Twenty years before promulgating his theory, General Walker had made light of Watson's pre- dictions. Writing in 1873 on the results of the IX. Census (1870), he dwelt upon the social change which began when the people of the United States began to leave agricul- tural for manufacturing pursuits; to turn from the country to the town; to live in up-and-down houses. ... A close observer must discern causes now working within the nation, which render it little less than absurd longer to apply the former rates of growth to the computation of our population at 1880, 1890, or 1900. ... It would be merely an attempt at imposture to assume that numerical data exist for determining, within eight or ten or twelve millions, the population of the country thirty years from the date of the last census. As long as one simple force was operating expansively upon a homogeneous people, within a territory affording fertile lands beyond the ability of the existing popula- tion to occupy, so long it was no miracle to predict with accuracy the results of the census. But in the eddy and swirl of social and industrial currents through which the nation is now passing, it is wholly impossible to estimate the rate of its progress. 3 Still General Walker's later theory stands and falls with Watson's predictions. A reaction against that theory was led by Prof. Wal- ter F. Willcox, in the Supplementary Analysis of the Results of the XII. Census. Later, in a paper read at the an- nual meeting of the American Statistical Association in St. Louis in ipio, 3 Prof essor Willcox proved by an analysis 1 Walker, loc. tit., p. 426. 2 Ibid., p. 43. * "The Change in the Proportion of Children in the United States" etc., by W. F. Willcox : Quarterly Publications of the A merican Statistical Association, March, 1911. 224 Immigration and Labor of population statistics "that the decrease in the proportion of children began in the United States as early as i8io." x The number of children under five years of age to one hundred women of the child-bearing age decreased in 1810- 1830 by 9.9, and in 1880-1900 by 9.4. Thus the twenty- year period of the recent immigration did not substantially differ in this respect from the time when, according to Gen- eral Walker himself, immigration had not affected the birth- rate among native Americans. Moreover, the declining birth-rate is a world-wide social phenomenon of the present day. In the Australian Com- monwealth, with her vast continent as yet unsettled and practically no immigration, as well as in New Zealand, "the decline of the birth-rate has probably been as rapid, " says Professor Willcox, "as among native American stock." 2 The greater decline of the native birth-rate in those sections and counties into which the foreigners most largely enter, goes together with the growth of the urban popu- lation. The percentage ratio of native white children of native parentage under five years of age, to native women of child-bearing age averaged in 1900 for cities with 25,000 inhabitants or over 29.6, and for smaller cities and rural territory 52.2. The latter ratio, of course, is subject to great variation, the limits being 76.7 in Louisiana and 29 . i in Massachusetts. 3 As indicated by these two extremes 1 Walker, loc. cit,, pp. 495-496. ' Supplementary Analysis. XII. Census, p. 410. Carlton, loc. eii., P- 347- " So alarming has this phenomenon of the falling birth-rate become in the Australian colonies, that in New South Wales a special govern- mental commission has voluminously reported upon the subject. It is estimated that there has been a decline of about one third in the fruit- fulness of the people in fifteen years. New Zealand even complains of the lack of children to fill her schools."-^- 4 'Race Progress and Immigra- tion," by William Z. Ripley, Annals of the American Academy m of Politi- cal and Social Science, vol. xxxiv., pp. 132-133. Supplementary Analysis, XII. Census, Table XXII., p. 434. Per cent ratio of native white children under 5 years of age, born of native mothers, to native white females 15 to 44 years of age in cities of less than 25,000 inhabitants and rural territory, 1900. UNDER 50 TO 60 ft 60% ScOVf.fi Race Suicide 225 the variation of the statistical average is to a great extent purely arithmetical, being due to the heterogeneous charac- ter of the settlements combined in this class; on the one hand, there are the manufacturing towns of Massachusetts, on the other, the purely agricultural settlements of Loui- siana. The connection between the agricultural character of the population of this class of settlements and the ratio of native-born children to native women of child-bearing age can be seen from Table 70 in which all States are divided into four areas, according to the ratio of native- born children under five, and the percentage of "farmers, planters, and overseers" to the total number of bread- winners for each group is given in a parallel column. TABLE 70. PER CENT RATIO OF NATIVE WHITE CHILDREN UNDER 5 TEARS OF AGE, BORN OF NATIVE MOTHERS, TO NATIVE WHITE FEMALES, 15 TO 44 YEARS OF AGE, IN CITIES OF LESS THAN 25.OOO INHABITANTS AND RURAL TERRITORY, AND PER CENT RATIO OF NATIVE WHITE MALE FARMERS, PLANTERS, AND OVERSEERS TO THE TOT^L NUMBER OF WHITE MALE BREADWINNERS, IQOO, BY AREAS COMPRISING STATES AND TERRITORIES GROUPED ACCORDING TO RATIO OF CHILDREN, 1900. (THE STATES ARE SHOWN ON THE MAP FACING THE TABLE.) Areas Children 1 Farmers, etc.* I II III IV Over 60 per cent 50 to 60 per cent 40 to 50 per cent Under 40 per cent 6 7 .2 54-2 47-5 35-3 38.4 26.4 21.6 13.3 Continental United States 52.2 24.7 The preceding table clearly shows that the native birth- rate declines with the percentage of farmers among the * Supplementary Analysis, XII. Census, Table XXII, p. 434- a Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 41, pp. 220 et seq. (computed). 226 Immigration and Labor native population. The rearing of children on a farm requires less^ of the mother's time and attention than in the city. Moreover, the child on a farm begins to work at an earlier age than in the city. A numerous family on a farm has the advantages of a co-operative group, whereas every addition to the family of the wage-earner, or of the salaried employee with a fixed income, tends to lower the family's standard of living. On the other hand, the decline of the birth-rate is uni- versal among those classes which are scarcely, if at all, affected by immigrant competition. This observation, advanced by students in America and in England, 1 was substantiated by the Report of the National Birth Rate Commission on the declining birth-rate in the United Kingdom. The results of its studies are summarized in the following proposition: Such statistical evidence as is available for establishing a comparison of the birth-rate among the different social and pecuniary grades of our population indicates that the better-to-do classes restrict more closely the size of their families, and that even among certain of the wage-earning classes the birth-rate varies inversely with the income. 1 Analyzing the interrelation between the declining birth- rate and "the condition of the working-class," the Com- mission concludes: 1 A. Lapthorn Smith: "Higher Education of Women and Race Suicide," Popular Science Monthly, March, 1905, pp. .468, 470. Arthur Newsholme: The Declining Birth-Rate , pp. 32, 33, 42-43. 2 The Declining Birth-Rate, Its Causes and Effects, p. 44. By way of illustration, the statistics of births in 191 1, provided by the Registrar- General for England and Wales are quoted in the table next following (Ibid., p. 9). The returns were classified according to the occupation of the father and summarized "in descending order of social grade." The figures represent the ratio of births per 1 ,000 married males under the age of 55. Social Class Births per 7,000 1. Upper and middle class 1 19 2. Intermediate TV. 132 3. Skilled workmen 153 4. Intermediate class 158 5. Unskilled workmen 213 Race Suicide 227 that every rise in the condition of the artisan tends at present to lower the birth-rate in his class. Wherever political and social conditions bring a man or a class into a position in which he hopes to rise or fears to fall, the family will be restricted. That class of motives, which we may blame as love of comfort, snobbishness, vulgar ambition, timorous- ness, or praise as proper pride, desire for self-improvement, and prudence, is the most potent cause of family restriction. 1 In relation to the United States, similar views were ex- pressed by the late Dr. Billings as far back as 1893. It is the desire of "the lower middle classes" to maintain "social position," along with "the great increase in the use of things which were formerly considered as luxuries, but which now have become almost necessities" that accounts in part for "the deliberate and voluntary avoidance or prevention of child-bearing." 2 Still "the lower middle classes" are scarcely affected by immigration. Their standard of living is, as a rule, higher than that of the wage-earner. Yet it is precisely this higher standard that is productive of a "desire to have fewer children." All speculation to the effect that an increase in the rate of wages "might have been attended" in the past, or is likely to be attended in the future, "by a larger natural increase among the native-born portion of the population," has accordingly no foundation of fact. 1 Ibid., pp. 41-42. 8 Supplementary Analysis, XII. Census, p. 410. CHAPTER X . THE STANDARD OF LIVING. A. Introductory IN so far as immigration is an economic movement, it is obvious that the immigrant's standard of living in his home country must have been below the American standard. This is as true of the old as of the new immigration. Those immigrants only are an exception to this rule who seek to escape from political or religious oppression. Its victims are not confined to the poorer classes, but include people of means and of standing in the community, whose standard of living is often superior to that of the native American mechanic. Since 1890, however, of all the races which have come to this country, the Jews, the Poles, the Lithuanians, the Russians, the Finns, and the Armenians, have furnished the only immigrants of this class. As to all others, it was just the higher standard of living F of the American wage-earner that induced them, like most races that preceded them, to emigrate to the United States. If the lower standard of living to which the immigrant has been accustomed at home tends to reduce the American standard of living, then these effects of immigration must have manifested themselves in the days of the Irish and German immigration as much as to-day. At most there may be only a difference of degree. That the standard of living of the recent immigrant employed as an unskilled laborer is lower than that of the native American mechanic or of the older immigrant engaged in skilled work, is no new 228 The Standard of Living 229 discovery. To prove, however, that the new immigrants have introduced a lower standard of living, it is necessary to show that the standard of living of the recent immigrants employed as unskilled laborers is lower than that of the Irish and German immigrants of past generations who were doing the same grade of work, or of the native American unskilled workers of the time before the Irish and German immigration. The experts of the Immigration Commission, however, have simply taken for granted that the standard of living of the present-day American or Americanized skilled mechanic is identical with that of the unskilled laborer of the same racial stocks in the days before the new immigration. This assumption is not borne out by Ameri- can economic history. The housing conditions of the foreign-born population have been most dwelt upon in the discussion of the standard of living of the immigrant, because they strike the eye of the outsider. On this subject there are ample comparative data. New York has always had more than its propor- tionate share of newly arrived immigrants; its housing problem, as affected by immigration, therefore, calls for separate treatment. B. Congestion in New York City Overcrowding was recognized as a serious evil in New York City as far back as 1834. A city inspector for that year attributed the high rate of mortality to "the crowded and filthy state" in which the population of New York lived. 1 As the city was growing, the well-to-do residents were moving northward and their old dwellings were let to the poor. The traditional American one-family house was adapted to the requirements of a population of inde- pendent artisans and small shopkeepers, many of whom were home-owners. With the growth of great cities and the rise of land values, and with the development of a 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 452. 230 Immigration and Labor wage-earning class, the one-family house became the cause of congestion in its worst form. The rental of such a house was beyond the reach of the wage-earner. Each room was let out to a separate family. Naturally, such improvised dwellings lacked the most necessary accommodations. The basement of the one-family house of the old type, formerly used as a dining-room and kitchen, developed into a separate cellar apartment. Towards the middle of the '40*8 there had grown up in New York a great "cellar population." A pen picture of the condition of the cellars is given in a report on the Sani- tary Condition of the Laboring Population^ which was published in 1845: The most offensive of all places of residence are the cellars. It is almost impossible, when contemplating the circumstances and condi- tions of the poor beings who inhabit these holes, to maintain the proper degree of calmness requisite for a thorough inspection of their miseries and sound judgment respecting them. You must descend to them; you must feel the blast of foul air, as it meets your face on opening the door; you must grope in the dark or hesitate until your eye becomes accustomed to the gloomy place, to enable you to find your way through the entry over the broken floor, the boards of which are protected from your tread by a half inch of hard dirt; you must inhale the suffocating vapor of the heated rooms; and in the dark, dim recesses endeavor to find the inmates by the sound of their voices, or chance to see their figures moving between you and the flickering light of a window, coated with dirt and festooned with cobwebs or, if in search of an invalid, take care that you do not fall full length upon the bed with her, by stumbling against the rags and straw dignified by that name, lying upon the floor, under the window, if window there is. 1 The occupants of these tenements were "principally Irish and German " whose habits were described in 1837 as "more or less filthy." An account of one of these houses, in the rear of No. 49 Elizabeth Street, is given in an official report of a city physician : The front building, a small two-story frame house, was partly occu- 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 453. The Standard of Living 231 pied by the proprietor or lessee of the building as a liquor store and partly sublet to several Irish families. A covered alleyway led to the rear of the building. This was a double frame house of three stories in height. It stood in the center of the yard, ranged next the fence, where a number of pigsties and stables had surrounded the yard on three sides. From the quantity of filth, liquid and otherwise, thus caused, the ground, I suppose, had been rendered almost impassable, and to remedy this, the yard had been completely boarded over so that the earth could nowhere be seen. These boards were partially decayed, and by a little pressure, even in dry weather, a thick, greenish, fluid could be forced up through the crevices. 1 These evils were not confined, however, to the foreign- bom population. The living conditions of the sewing women, a large majority of whom were American-born, were thus described by the New York Tribune, in the same year 1 845: These women generally "keep house" that is, they rent a single room, or perhaps two small rooms, in the upper story of some poor, ill-constructed, unventilated house in a filthy street, constantly kept so by the absence of back yards and the neglect of the street inspector where a sickening and deadly miasma pervades the atmosphere and in summer renders it totally unfit to be inhaled by human lungs de- positing the seeds of debility and disease with every inspiration In these rooms all the processes of cooking, eating, sleeping, washing, working, and living are indiscriminately performed. 2 Bad as these conditions were, they were not the worst. The wages of Irish laborers in Brooklyn were so low that they could not afford to pay any rent at all, so "they were allowed to build miserable shanties on ground allotted them by the contractors on the plot occupied by them in perform- ing the work.'* 3 In the '6o's there was a "shanty population "of about 20,000 on the upper west side of Manhattan Island. It was composed of Germans and Irish. They were largely 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., pp. 45 2 ~453- a Helen L. Sumner: Report of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States, vol. ix., p. 135. 3 Documentary History of American Industrial Society, vol. viii., pp. 225- 226; quoting from New York Weekly Tribune, May 2, 1846, p. 3, col. 3. 232 Immigration and Labor day laborers, employed by contractors in grading, paving, and sewering the streets, and in the removal of rock, or in excavating for public purposes. In a typical shanty, according to an inspector of the council of hygiene, "domi- ciliary and personal cleanliness is almost impossible. In one room are found the family, chairs, usually dirty and broken, cooking utensils, stove, often a bed, a dog or cat, and sometimes more or less poultry. On the outside, by the door in many cases, are pigs and goats and additional poultry. There is no sink or drainage, and the slops are thrown upon the ground." 1 Gloomy pictures of the housing conditions which pre- vailed in the '6o's are drawn in contemporary reports of medical inspectors. They speak in general terms of "the contracted alleys; the underground, murky, and pestilential cellars ; the tenement house, with its hundreds of occupants where each cooks, eats, and sleeps in a single room without light or ventilation, surrounded with filth, in an atmosphere foul, fetid, and deadly." 3 The Thirteenth Ward was densely crowded with working classes, the majority of whom were Irish; Germans ranked next, and Am- ericans last. . . . The ward showed a high rate of sickness and mortality, owing to the over-crowded and ill-ventilated dwellings and to the ignorant and careless habits of the people themselves. . . . From Fortieth to Fiftieth Street the foreign population was mainly Irish or of Irish descent, packed in filthy tenements and of the most unclean and degraded personal habits. . . . The tenement houses in which most of the foreign population found their homes were certainly little calculated to develop high social and moral types, and indeed brought to bear influences working directly the other way. 3 The following description of the tenements in Sheriff Street, which was then settled by Germans, is quoted from contemporary sources: The attic rooms are used to deposit the filthy rags and bones as they are taken from the gutters and slaughterhouses. The yards are filled with dirty rags hung up to dry, sending forth their stench to all the 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 457. Ibid., p. 454. a Ibid., p. 458. The Standard of Living 233 neighborhood. . . . The tenants are all Germans. . . . They are exceedingly filthy in person and their bedclothes are as dirty as the floors they walk on. Their food is of the poorest quality, and their feet and hands, doubtless their whole bodies are suffering from what they call rheumatism, but which in reality is a prostrate nervous system, the result of foul air and inadequate supply of nutritious food. . . . The yards are all small and the sinks running over with filth. . . . Not one decent sleeping apartment can be found on the entire premises and not one stove properly arranged. The carbonic-acid gas, in conjunction with the other emanations from bones, rags, and human filth, defies description. The rooms are 6 by 10 feet; bedrooms 5 by 6 feet. The inhabitants lead a miserable existence, and their children wilt and die in their infancy. 1 When at length the tenement dwellers crowded the old one-family residences to the utmost limit of their capacity, the further growth of population led to the utilization of the back yards, for building purposes. A special type of rear tenement came into existence. The terrible con- ditions that arose from lack of ventilation and sanitary conveniences are vividly depicted in a report of a city inspector concerning a square of front and rear tenements which were occupied mostly by Irish: In a majority of rear tenements . . . the apartments are dirty, dark, and often reeking with filth, the walls wholly innocent of whitewash, and the atmosphere impregnated with the disagreeable odor so peculiar to tenant houses. In some the sun never shines, and the apartments are so dark that unless seated near the window it is impossible to read ordinary type; and yet the inspector often hears the hackneyed expres- sion, "We have no sickness, thank God, " uttered by those whose sunken eyes, pale cheeks, and colorless lips speak more eloquently than words of the anaemic condition inevitably resulting from the absence of pure, fresh air, and the general light of the sun. . . . The tenants seem to wholly disregard personal cleanliness, if not the very first principles of decency, their general appearance and actions corresponding with their wretched abodes. This indifference to personal and domiciliary cleanliness is doubtless acquired from a long familiarity with the loathsome surround- ings, wholly at variance with all moral or social improvements, as well as the first principles of hygienic science.* The fundamental cause of congestion with all its attend- 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 461. *Ibid., p. 456. 234 Immigration and Labor ant evils is the fact that wage- workers must live within an accessible distance from their places of work. This neces- sity puts the owners of real estate in the factory district in a position of advantage over the tenants. The landlord took the utmost advantage of the situation by charging the highest possible prices for the poorest possible accommodations, and disregarding every law of health and decency in erecting big bar- racks meant for occupation by the poor. An inspector for the council of hygiene in 1864 thus reports the landlords' methods with regard to repairs: Every expenditure of money which the law does not enforce to make is refused; and blinds half swung and ready to fall and crash with the first strong wind; doors long off their hinges, which open and shut by being taken up bodily and put out of or in the way; chimneys as apt to conduct the smoke into the room as out of it; stagnant, seething, over- flowing privies, left uncleansed through the hot months of summer, though pestilence itself should breed from them; hydrants out of repair and flooding sink and entry; stairs which shake and quiver with every step as you ascend them; and all this day after day, month after month, year in and year out. 1 Such were the housing conditions to which the "old immigrants" of Teuton and Celtic stock submitted for more than a quarter of a century, at a time when the population of New York was but a fraction of its present size, and there was still an abundance of unimproved land in the upper part of Manhattan Island. These conditions are a thing of the past. The typical tenement house in the Jewish and Italian sections of New York to-day is a decided improvement upon the dwellings of the Irish and the Ger- mans in the same sections a generation or two ago. "The visitor of 1900 could go about dry-shod, at least, in tene- ment yards and courts where thirty-five years before the accumulation of what should have gone off in sewers and drains made access almost impossible." 2 The causes of the present congestion in New York City 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 459. a Ibid., p. 488. The Standard of Living 235 have been the subject of an exhaustive investigation by Professor Pratt, of the New York School of Philanthropy. Although believing that restriction of immigration would have "salutary results in different directions," he found from the mass of statistical evidence collected by him, that congestion is produced by industrial factors which are not related to immigration and over which the immigrants have no control. We must abstain, for want of space, from quoting his statistics. His conclusions are reproduced in condensed form, yet, as nearly as possible verbatim, in the following abstract 1 : " New York City is the great mart of, the American conti- nent. Every company or corporation of any size or import- ance has offices, usually its principal offices, in New York City. The New York market, therefore, is an exceedingly important factor in the concentration of manufacturers in that city. The fact that New York City is large and commercially great, makes it a desirable place in which to locate a manufacturing enterprise. A very large and increasing importance should be attached to this element as a factor in the congestion of manufactures in New York City. During the last half century New York has been changing from a purely commercial city to a manufacturing center as well. The value of manufactured products has increased nearly tenfold. The great bulk of the manufac- turing in greater New York is carried on in Manhattan below Fourteenth Street, on that small but immensely valuable one-hundredth of the city's total land area. Of the whole number of workers engaged in manufactures in Manhattan, 321,488, or 66.8 per cent, work in factories below Fourteenth Street, while only 160,368 or 33.2 per cent work in the much larger area above Fourteenth Street. The problem of congestion of population, then, seems to be closely linked with that of congestion of industries. "Population must live within an accessible distance of its place of work. Hence, it is scarcely necessary to point out how important a cause of congestion of population the concentration of industry, trade, and commerce becomes. 1 Edward Ewing Pratt: Industrial Causes of Congestion of Population in New York City, pp. 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 39, 42, 94, 97, 138, 145, 146, 155, 166, 167, 182, 183, 185, 186, 187, 188, 204. 236 Immigration and Labor The conditions of labor exercise a preponderating influence upon the lives of the workers. Long hours and low pay have compelling force and necessitate the residence of the overworked and underpaid in the over-crowded and con- gested districts of New York City. Even the efficient work- man counts the carfare to distant points a drain on his income, and locates near the industrial districts. The conclusion indicated is irresistible, that the factory and the workshop are the predominant factor in the lives of these workers, and that the factories in the crowded sections of Manhattan are largely responsible for the problem of congestion of population which confronts the city in these districts. The latter being limited in size, buildings must be erected which will house many families. Some students of the problem have discovered the fact that in the most congested districts there are to be found the largest pro- portions of aliens. The conclusion is then drawn that congestion is due to immigration. The best that can be said of this generalization is that it is indeed a hasty one. The tendency for people to group themselves together in a strange land is most natural. The newly arrived immigrant seeks his friends or relatives, if he has none, he seeks com- panionship where he can understand and where he can be understood. From this little nationality group, he makes his start in the struggle of the New World. These steady accessions of newly arrived immigrants no doubt augment the crowded districts, but they are scarcely an important cause. Similar tendencies of congregation among immi- grants are found in sparsely settled Minnesota and in the Dakotas, but we do not find congestion. The logical explanation is, that there are other and perhaps more fundamental causes at work. "One of the most powerful lodestones of the city is the city itself, and within the city, the center is the magnet. These advantages of the city and the center of the city are not purely pleasurable, but are social in the best sense of the word. It is at the center of a great city like New York that educational and cultural facilities are found most highly developed. As a shrewd employer of men once said, 'A man can get more for nothing in New York City than he can buy with his whole wage in a small town. ' He can get more pleasure, more excitement, more education, than he can anywhere else. The city contributes to every side of a man, no matter how varied his nature. This is true, The Standard of Living 237 in general, of the city; it is pre-eminently true of the center of the city's population, where congestion has occurred, or is likely to occur. "Congestion is often attributed to the inordinate desire of certain races or nationalities to congregate. The Jews and the Italians have each been accused of causing conges- tion. These recent arrivals have no doubt largely inhabited congested districts, but it seems unjust and unscientific to assert that congestion is caused by these groups of people. In fact the entire reasoning underlying this theory of congestion is based on a priori logic and is open to serious objections. The returns of workers employed in Lower Manhattan, in the uptown factories, in Brooklyn, near Brooklyn Bridge, in Williamsburg, in Queens Borough, near the 34th Street Ferry, and in suburban factories located on the outskirts of Greater New York, display certain uni- form tendencies which may be formulated as follows: "A working population tends to live in the immediate vicinity of its place of employment. "The distribution of a working population is greatly influenced by such industrial factors as hours of work and wages. The degree of distribution may be termed residence- mobility. "The residence-mobility of a working population varies inversely with the length of the working day or week. The longer the working day the intenser the congestion. "The residence-mobility of a working population varies directly with the wages or labor. The workers earning the lowest wages are the most congested. "The nationality or race of the workers has no appre- ciable effect upon the residence-mobility of a working population. " In the most congested districts a large proportion of the workers find it impossible to secure adequate or comfortable living quarters. Hence we find that the workers employed in Lower Manhattan take, on the average, a longer time in getting to and from work than the workers in any other group. Nor do the workers employed near Manhattan show any tendency whatever, that could be interpreted as indicating a preference for the congested districts. The workers prefer to live near their places of employment. This is the tendency despite nationality, which may be urging them to live among their countrymen. These facts indicate that the recently-arrived Italian or Russian 238 Immigration and Labor Jew does not prefer to live in the congested districts. They are found to reside near their places of work, and when the two alternatives are open to them, the larger proportion embraces the opportunity to live among decent surroundings. The most important finding in the investi- gation of the group of workers employed in Brooklyn near the Brooklyn Bridge is the relatively small proportion who live in Manhattan, in spite of its accessibility. With the crowded down-town colony of Little Italy easily accessible, only 37.8 per cent of these Italians live in Lower Manhattan. Of the group working in Brooklyn, there are more than fifty per cent less Italians, and almost fifty per cent less Russians and Jews living in Manhattan, than of the groups that are employed in Manhattan. This fact shows the effect of concentrating industries in Manhattan and demon- strates what a difference exists when the factories are located only just outside. Manufacturers in suburban sites within accessible distance of Manhattan remove their workmen from the congested districts. The workmen, when given the chance, prefer to live in the less crowded sections. This is true even of the much-maligned Italian and Jew. "When the influence of immigration and the distribution of the various nationalities are carefully considered, the tendency of our immigrant people to live in congested districts near the work places cannot occasion very great surprise, in view of the fact that our foreign population is the most unskilled, and therefore, the lowest paid, and that it is employed in industries working the longest hours. This tendency and the fact that aliens form the largest part of our most congested population is admitted has been frequently seized upon as the explanation of conges- tion, and hence these theorists ihave demanded restriction of immigration as a remedy for congestion. However, if congestion were due to the desire or willingness of our alien population to live in congested districts, we should expect those employed within a reasonable distance of Manhattan to make every effort to live there. But this is exactly contrary to the facts as brought out in the preceding study. The Italians, Jews, and Slavic peoples, who have oftenest been indicted for congestion, have proved themselves innocent and their positive unwillingness to live in Man- hattan, when escape is offered, is evidenced by every group of workers in the factories outside of Lower Manhattan. The Standard of Living 239 If, therefore, this mass of evidence has any weight, the oftrepeated theory of congestion that it is the result of the preference of the people, the gregarious instinct is disproved. "The basic cause of congestion in all great cities is to be found in the failure on the part of the community to provide necessary safeguards. The first of these negative causes is the lack of proper planning of the city. Had our cities been laid out on broad, comprehensive plans, had our streets been laid out on wide, intelligent lines, and adequate parks provided, had our industrial and commercial districts been segregated, and our residence districts reserved, some of the very tap-roots of congestion would have been re- moved. "The lack of adequate building laws is closely linked to that of city planning. The limitation of the area of the lot which can be built upon, the height of the house, the size of the rooms, are all factors which would definitely and certainly confine and limit congestion. But even those laws we have, have not been adequately enforced. Had our laws been enforced in the best possible manner, we would have gained a little in preventing congestion. Of the local conditions peculiar to New York, which with thought and foresight might have been prevented, the first and foremost is the lack of adequate rapid transit. Whenever it has been advantageous to do business in Lower Man- hattan, it has been convenient, because of lack of transit facilities, both to have a permanent place of business there and to live there. Transit not only converged on Lower Manhattan, but what there was of it simply conveyed people into the crowded districts and 'dumped' them. Had transit facilities to neighboring localities been con- venient and adequate, the population might have availed itself of the advantages of the central city, and business might have flourished in other than down-town Man- hattan districts. Important factors in the campaign for the relief of congestion of population in Manhattan are: first, the removal of factories from Manhattan, and their distribution according to some comprehensive plan through- out the outlying suburbs; second, the enactment of laws to prevent the reproduction of bad living and housing con- ditions in the other neighborhoods. This is city planning. ' ' It is evident from Professor Pratt's analysis that conges- 240 Immigration and Labor tion in New York City is not wrought by the habits or standards of living of the immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe, but is forced upon them by conditions not of their own making. As regards the effects of this congestion upon the rate of wages, on the other hand, the determining factor is not the discomfort suffered by the immigrant, but the amount he must expend for rent. And it is a well-known fact that house rent in New York is higher than in the rest of the United States. The average rent in New York City for a normal workingman's family, according to latest pre-war statistics, was $13.50 to $14.00 a month, whereas in the rest of the United States, it ranged from $8.25 to $11.00 per month. 1 The Jewish ,or Italian immigrant in New York City was compelled to expend for rent about $1.00 a week more than the wage-earners in small towns where the native American workmen predominate. The American workman may be better housed, yet when the manufacturer employing immigrant labor in New York must meet in the nation's market his competitor employing native American labor in a small country town, it is the native American workman, rather than the immigrant recently arrived in New York from Southern or Eastern Europe, that can be induced or coerced to accept a lower wage. C. Housing Conditions in the Country at Large In a retrospective view of the New England textile manufacturing towns of the period when the operatives in Amos G. Warner; American Charities, p. 180. "Not only is the cost of housing less in cities outside of New York, but the accommodations enjoyed are better. Detached houses are the rule, with no question of access to light and air. The number of rooms is 3, in only I case of the 53 (Rochester) ; only 6 report 4 rooms, and 7 and 8 rooms are of fre- quent occurrence. . . . For $8.00 a month in the smaller towns of the State, and $10.00 or $n.oo in the cities like Syracuse, better accommo- ations can be secured than for $15.00 in Manhattan." Chapin: The Standard of Living in New York City, p. 303. The Standard of Living 241 the mills were recruited among the farm girls of the neigh- borhood, the Immigration Commission has discovered a description of their living conditions "which affords a pleasing contrast with the Lowell of the present." "The life in the boarding houses was very agreeable. These houses belonged to the corporation," 1 i. e. t they were "company houses," in modern parlance. Dr. Sumner, however, in her History of Women in Industry in the United States, written for the U. S. Bureau of Labor, quotes other contemporary testimony less bucolic in character. From the same town of Lowell, complaints were made in 1845 that a dozen or more of the "daughters of New England" were crowded into "the same hot, ill-ventilated attic." The boarding houses of the Tremont mills in 1847 were described in the following extract from a letter: T is quite common for us to write on the cover of a bandbox, and sit upon a trunk, as tables or chairs in our sleeping rooms are all out of the question, because there is no room for such articles, as 4 to 6 occupy every room, and of course trunks and bandboxes constitute furniture for the rooms we occupy. A thing called a light-stand, a little more than a foot square, is our table for the use of 6. Wash- stands are uncommon articles it has never been my lot to enjoy their use, except at my own expense. 3 Comparative statistics of house tenancy in Boston in 1855 and 1900 show that in the middle of the nineteenth century the tenement house population was as numerous, in proportion, as in our day. This can be seen from Table 71 on page 242. Overcrowded and filthy tenement houses were as preva- lent forty years ago in Boston, as in New York. There also the conversion of the single family house into a tene- ment house, where a whole family was jammed in every room, was productive "of filth and grime." An early report of the Massachusetts Labor Bureau, describing the 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, pp. 508-509. * Helen L. Sumner: Report of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States, vol. ix., pp. 87-88. 242 . Iitomigration and Labor $* tenement houses of Boston and their surroundings, speaks of "hovels rotting with damp and mould," of "puddles reeking with stenchy garbage,*' of "putrid cesspools and uncleansed drains, befouled with unspeakable nastiness." 1 TABLE 71. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF THE FAMILIES OF BOSTON ACCORDING TO NUMBER OF FAMILIES PER HOUSE, 1855 AND IQOO. 3 Per cent of families Living in 1855 1900 1 family houses 31.8 32.2 2 family houses 23.5 26.5 Tenements with 3 or more families 44.7 41 .3 Total 100.0 100.0 The degree of congestion at the close of the '6o's is exem- plified by the description of a block of tenements consisting of fifty-six rooms which were occupied by fifty-four families, mostly Irish. There were also a few English and colored families among them. The stairways were rotten and dangerous. The ventilation of the rooms was very poor. Washing, ironing, and drying were all done in the only room which was both a living room and a sleeping room. 3 The two-room tenements on Meander Street consisted of a living and a sleeping room, both dark and damp and dirty. Other tenements visited were old, rickety frame houses with plastering broken down and full of holes through which rain and sun freely entered. In the summer the houses swarmed with vermin. These houses were occupied by American and Irish tenants. Another tenement house in Kingston Court was a wooden building consisting of six apartments, some with three rooms and some with only one to each. The living rooms 1 Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor, jd Annual Report (1871-1872), pp. 437-438. 3 Census of Boston, 1855, p. n (percentages computed); XII. Census of United States. Population, Part II., p. 186, Table XCVIII. 3 Reports of the Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1870, pp. 164-180. The Standard of Living 243 were 10 by 14; the sleeping rooms 7 by 9. The sun never penetrated the sleeping rooms. Water was obtained from a hydrant in the yard upon which twenty-six families depended. Broken windows patched up with boards and rags, rickety and broken-down stairs were not unusual. We quote the concluding sentence of the report : We could describe other tenement-house abominations of the same foulness and beastly defilement, but it would be but a repetition of nastiness and negligence, and for which neither memory or dictionary could supply words not yet used, or language adequate to the filthy picturing. 1 In the smaller Massachusetts towns, the working people were as badly housed as in Boston. The following is reproduced from contemporary testimony given by a canvasser who went through many of the tenements of Danvers : Take them as a whole, they are horrid; those belonging to the factory especially. There are tenement houses there that ought not to be occupied. Four families have complained to me, that if they go to bed at night and there comes a shower, they have to rise up and put dishes in different places to catch the water, and that they can't sleep in their beds; and to prove it I went and examined and saw it was actually worse than they had said; one house, especially, where a person came to me, and I saw he did n't look right, and I said, "Are you going to work?" "No," he says, "had no sleep last night." It had been raining and his mother had been baking and preparing things for the house, and, in the morning almost everything had swum off and gone away in all directions. . . . Another house, I was almost afraid to go into. I could see right through into the cellar; the plastering was entirely off the ceiling and they told me it leaked in just about the same way. There is another house, where there is a yard square without a shingle on it; and then another has an addition to it, and you can put your whole arm right in betwixt the two. It is more like a pig-pen than a decent house . . . when people are in the water-closet, the people on the road can see them. There is not a good tenement in the village. 2 1 Reports of the Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1871, pp. 517-531. * Ibid., pp. 442-443- 244 Immigration and Labor The same conditions were reported from Salem. The houses were seldom repaired, the plumbing was very poor, and the pump water was often made unfit for drinking purposes by the washings of the yard. The odor in the houses was bad. The following description of a house at No. 1 8 Lemon Street, is quoted as an extreme case, which nevertheless indicates what conditions were tolerated in those days: In connection with the kitchen, and only separated by a door was the pantry, quite reluctantly shown us by the mistress. She said that it being very much out of repair, and not fit to be used as such, they con- cluded it was best to turn it into a cowshed. Here were two cows, and all the accompaniments usually found in a stable, in direct connection with the kitchen, filling the house with its unmitigated stench. In this place pigs and hens were once kept, besides the cow, the former on all occasions making the freest use of the domestic apartments. 1 About the same time (1872) shanty dwellers were found among the laborers of Massachusetts. The paymaster of tunnel laborers employed at North Adams in 1872 testified that many of them lived in shanties on the works and even kept boarders. ''The miners, rockmen, etc., who have no families, board at the shanties. They are filthy, dirty places. The congestion and squalor of the past were no better than the worst housing conditions that were found by the investigators of the Immigration Commission among the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. Yet the tenement-house dwellers of forty years ago were all of Teuton and Celtic stock. As stated in a previous chapter, contemporary observers sought to explain the bad housing conditions of the Irish immigrants by the low standard of living of the people of Ireland. 3 Although living conditions 1 Reports of the Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1870, pp. 372 and 380. a Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor. Third Annual Report (1871-1872), pp. 440-441- * Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 459. The Standard of Living 245 in Ireland have greatly improved since those days, yet they still remain far below the average of the most overcrowded sections of the great American cities. The investigation of the Immigration Commission was confined to "the overcrowded, poor quarters of the city"; in the households investigated, the average number of persons per room was I.34. 1 In the city of Dublin, accord- ing to the census of 1901, four fifths of all tenements con- sisted of four rooms or less with an average of 2.20 persons per room. More than one third of all tenements had three persons .or more per room. Three fifths of all tenements consisted of one or two rooms only. 2 In the whole of Ireland, one third of all families lived in two rooms or less. 3 There were 38,086 families of three or more persons living in one room each. These extremes of congestion comprised 4.2 per cent of all Irish families. The details are given in Table 72. TABLE 72. NUMBER OF TENEMENTS OF ONE ROOM OCCUPIED BY THREE OR MORB PERSONS, I90I.4 Number of Occupied by 3 persons 4 persons 5 persons 6 persons 7 persons 8 persons 9 persons 10 persons 1 1 persons 12 persons or more Total 38,036 If it is maintained that the immigrant tends to transplant to the American soil the standard of living of his native country, it must follow from the latest statistics of housing conditions in Ireland that even the present-day Irish immi- 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. tit., pp. 117, 119. 3 See Appendix, Table XVI. ' Census of Ireland, 1901. General Report, p. 112, Table 9; p. 173, Table 49. Ibid., Table 10. 246 Immigration and Labor grants are open to the same objection as the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. The fact that the investi- gation of the Immigration Commission discovered among the Irish no overcrowding approaching that of their mother country must be taken to mean one of two things : either its investigators overlooked the recent Irish immigrants and selected only old Irish settlers who had in the course of time advanced on the social scale, or else the standard of living of the recent Irish immigrants in the United States was not determined by their living conditions in Ireland, but depended upon their earning ability in this country. In either case the race theory of economics fathered by the Commission fails. That bad housing conditions are not the exclusive char- acteristic of the immigrant, but are found under like econ- omic conditions among the native wage-earners as well, has been shown by the investigation of the Immigration Commis- sion in Alabama, where there are practically no foreigners whose competition might be supposed to have forced down the American standard of living. In the outlying towns, beyond the territory immediately adjacent to Birmingham, many of the bituminous coal mines are operated exclusively by native labor and native white Americans are employed as unskilled laborers. "In these environments the home of the native white laborer is frequently devoid of the more modern equipment and sanitation." 1 Mr. Streightoff , in his study of the standard of living, uses stronger language. According to him, "in the Southern mill towns conditions are about at their worst." The number of foreign-born wage-earners in the Southern mills is negligible and cannot affect the housing situation. The mill workers are country people of old American stock. And yet the company houses in which they live "are neither sheathed, plastered, nor papered, and the tenants suffer intensely from the occasional cold weather." 3 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, p. 229. 3 Streightoff: The Standard of Living, pp. 76-77 and 92. The Standard of Living 247 The preceding comparison between the present and the past, on the one hand, and between native and foreign- born mill and mine workers, on the other, irresistibly leads to the conclusion that the cause of bad housing conditions is not racial, but economic. That the difference among wage-earners in this respect "depends, of course . . . upon the income, " is admitted, "to a considerable extent, " by the experts of the Immigration Commission with the qualification, however, that the difference depends "appar- ently also upon the insistence" of the tenants themselves upon having proper accommodations. * If the South Italian or Irish laborers, or the Southern white mill hands, are not so well housed as their Welsh foreman, or English engineer, it is because, apart from their inability to raise the rent of a substantial dwelling, they do not "insist" upon having it for the money they are able to pay. That the English or German laborers and factory hands of past generations lived in filthy tenements, must have been due, by the same method of reasoning, to lack of "insistence" on their part upon better accommodations. This view implies a belief that the law of supply and demand will assure to the wage- workers such homes as they will "insist" upon. The economic distinction between land and other forms of property is lost sight of. The inadequacy of the law of supply and demand in the matter of housing was conclusively demonstrated by all investigations of the New York housing system, which "agreed in showing the landlord, rather than the helpless tenant, as the primitive cause of tenement evils." 2 In the mill towns and mining camps of to-day, as in the 1 "There seems to be a decided difference . . . among the various races the South Italians and the Syrians among the recent immigrants, the Irish among the older immigrants, not being so well provided with sanitary equipment as are the other races. This depends, of course, to a considerable extent, upon the income, but apparently also upon the insistence of the persons themselves upon having proper water supply and toilet accommodations." Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., p. 126. 3 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 459. 248 Immigration and Labor mill towns of Massachusetts in the days of the "old immigration," the helplessness of the tenant is aggravated by the combination of the landlord and mill owner in the same individual or corporation, whose income is derived from house rents, as well as from manufacturing or mining. "In many industrial localities," say Professors Jenks and Lauck, "especially in those connected with the mining industry, the so-called 'company-house* system prevails under which the industrial worker . . . must live in a house owned by the operating company and rented to him." x This system is as common in the Anglo-Saxon towns of the South, as in the Slav settlements of Pennsylvania. 3 If the mill or mine worker were to "insist" upon a better dwelling, he could not hold his position. The Immigration Commission made no systematic inquiries to ascertain the landlords' share of responsibility for the overcrowding and unsanitary conditions of the houses occupied by the new immigrants in industrial communities. The outspoken tendency of its investiga- tion was to lay the whole blame upon the habits of the immigrants. There are scattered in its reports, however, occasional items of information which tell the other side of the story. The following description of a "company house" is illuminating: The type of company house most frequently seen in the locality adjacent to Birmingham is a one-story frame building containing from two to four rooms, the four-room houses being frequently divided into two apartments. . . . They are usually devoid of any modern con- veniences, such as bath or flush toilet. But these houses are "built in close proximity to the steel, iron, or coke yard in which the laborers are em- ployed," 3 and they have no other choice but to take such houses as the company provides for them, or to travel a distance to and from work. 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., p. 279 * Streightoff, loc. cit., pp. 76-77. Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, p. 232. The Standard of Living 249 From an account relating to another locality we learn that the rent paid by the recent immigrants "is excessive, and yields an unusually large rate of return to his landlord." * It may be surmised from this illustration that the income from company houses also very likely "pays more than the ordinary return on the cost of the building." The effect of the emphasis, however, laid by the Com- mission upon the "tendency . . . characteristic of the South Italian and Slav races" to "settle in that section of the town where . . . the house rent is reduced to a mini- mum" 2 is to divert public attention from the responsibility of the mine and mill operators for the insanitary condition of the tenements provided by them for their employees. 3 The police power of the State is ample to protect the health of the community from the ill effects of insanitary housing conditions. Considered on its own merits, as a problem in public hygiene, the housing of the mine and mill opera- tives, whether native or foreign-born, has therefore no relevancy to the subject of immigration. In reality, however, the housing problem is drawn into 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, pp. 93-94. * Ibid., p. 229. * The following is quoted from a "description of a typical mining and coke village" in Pennsylvania: "The typical company village is exceedingly insanitary. . . . The water supply of the coal and coke town is very impure and a source of disease. The companies usually 'clean up' the towns once a year; sometimes twice, but often not at all. There is little to stimulate cleanliness on the part of the tenants under such circumstances. The mine operators say that the existing conditions result from the fact that the foreigner is too dirty for the town to be other than what it is, but whether this is true or not, it seems that very little effort is made to improve the living conditions." (Ibid., vol. 6, p. 323.) The defense is very typical, indeed. Because " the foreigner is dirty, " the mining company which owns the village provides him with impure water which is a source of disease, and cleans up the village only twice a year. It is evident that the tenants cannot build water-works, nor can they install a system of sewerage. It would not avail them to "insist" upon these improvements, as there is no place to which they could move in case of refusal, these conditions being "typical." 250 Immigration and Labor the discussion of immigration only collaterally, as an argument in support of a theory. The Immigration Com- mission has filled its volumes with statistical tables, some of which show that the English-speaking wage-workers are better housed than the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, and others that the earnings of the former are higher. The impression conveyed by the race classifi- cation 1 is that the wages of the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe are low because they are willing to live in crowded quarters, whereas the wages of the English- speaking workmen are higher, because they "insist" upon the American standard of living. The Immigration Com- mission's own statistics, however, contain a refutation of this theory. In the first place, it appears that there is the widest variation among wage-earners of each race with respect to housing, which shows that there is no common standard of living for all wage-earners of the same race, but that it varies for the individuals of the same race. Neither do the low rents paid by some of them force down the earnings of others of the same race, as demonstrated by the wide varia- tions in earnings among individuals of the same race. In the second place, it is found that "the household of immigrants, as compared with the native born wage-earners pays, generally speaking, the same if not higher rent per room." 2 In some districts the average monthly rent per apartment is also higher for recent immigrants than for American wage-earners of native parentage. In Ensley, 1 Some of the "race" distinctions are unique. Thus we are informed that the Macedonians paid $5.53 per apartment, whereas the Greeks paid $5.94 and the Bulgarians only $4.28. (Ibid., vol. 9, p. 234, Table 687.) It can be found in the Commission's own Dictionary of Races that Macedonia is merely a political division with a mixed population consisting chiefly of Bulgarians and Greeks. Professors Jenks and Lauck also comment upon the per capita jnonthly rent payments of the Bulgarians who paid only $0.97, and the Macedonians who paid $0.78. (Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 131-132.) 3 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit. t p. 122. The Standard of Living 251 Ala., e. ., the latter paid on an average $5.40 per apartment, the Greeks, $5.94, and the Poles, $5.98. The lowest average rent per room was paid by the native white of native parentage, viz., $1.38; the new immigrants ranged in the following order: Slovaks, $1.73; Bulgarians, $1.82; Poles, $1.91; South Italians, $2.09; Greeks, $2.93. 1 It is believed, however, that the difference in rent is reduced by overcrowding, which is "most frequently shown by the keeping of boarders or lodgers." 2 Great stress is laid upon the fact that the Southern and Eastern Europeans "break the independence of family life by taking boarders or lodgers into the home," whereas "the native American and older immigrant employees maintain an independent form of family life," though they send their wives and children to the factory. 3 It is worthy of note, as a his- torical parallel, that in 1873 General Walker spoke of "the detestable American vice of 'boarding* . . . uprooting the ancient and honored institutions of the family." 4 The Commission has laboriously figured out for each race the percentage of families taking lodgers or boarders. Aside from the merits of this criterion which will be considered later, it is open to question, whether the figures of the Commission may be accepted as typical. A similar inves- tigation recently made by the United States Bureau of Labor led to widely divergent results. Out of 1139 Ameri- can households studied by the Immigration Commission only 10 per cent had boarders or lodgers; out of 15,161 American households, however, studied by the Bureau of Labor 22.23 P er cen t kept boarders or lodgers. The variation of the percentage by race in the statistics of the Immigration Commission was from o to 79.3 per cent, whereas in the statistics of the United States Bureau of Labor the range of variation was from 16.50 to 30.77 per 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9., p. 234, Table 687. 2 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., p. 122. a Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 158, 161. * Walker: Discussions in Economics and Statistics, p. 43. 252 Immigration and Labor cent. The discrepancies between the two series of figures relating to the old immigration are shown in Table 73. TABLE 73. PER CENT OF FAMILIES KEEPING BOARDERS OR LODGERS AMONG THE RACES OF THE OLD IMMIGRATION. 1 Nativity Source of information Immigration Commission United States Bureau of Labor .0 2.2 4.1 6-3 6.4 7-i 9.6 20.13 26.89 23.51 26.78 30.71 25.92 2379 Welsh Scotch . , Irish English . . That two official investigations separated by a brief interval of six or seven years have brought such widely divergent results, can probably be accounted for by the fact that the investigations of the Immigration Commission were concentrated upon selected industrial communities, where the English-speaking immigrants were mostly high- priced skilled mechanics, whereas the new immigrants were nearly all unskilled laborers; it has been shown, however, in Chapter VII. that each race is represented in every occu- pation. The investigation of the United States Bureau of Labor, on the other hand, was made in the leading indus- trial centers of thirty-three States and is believed to be "representative of the industrial portion of the country as a whole. " a Apart, however, from the doubtful value of the statistics collected by the Immigration Commission on the subject of boarders and lodgers, the fatal defect of its race per- Jenks and Lauck, loc. tit., p. i6oT Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, p. 261. Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, p. 39. The Standard of Living 253 centages is that they assume by implication a communistic system of housekeeping among the foreign-born. In reality, however, the 52 per cent of the Croatians who keep boarders or lodgers do not help to pay the rent of the other 48 per cent who keep none. The latter must themselves pay the rent in full, which is at least as high as that paid by the natives. It is evident that the wages of those who have no lodgers must be sufficient to enable them to pay the same rent as the native Americans, which goes to show that those of them who do keep lodgers do not force down the earnings of their countrymen. That overcrowding is not a racial characteristic, but an economic phenomenon, appears from the following table showing the comparative frequency of the practice of keeping boarders or lodgers in families of foreign-born garment workers and woolen mill operatives classified by annual earnings. TABLE 74- PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN FAMILIES IN WHICH WIFE HAS EMPLOY- MENT OR KEEPS BOARDERS OR LODGERS, BY YEARLY EARNINGS OF HUSBAND. x Husband's earnings. Per cent of wives keep ng boarders or lodgers Garment workers Woolen mill operatives Under $400 .... 28.2 61 4 $400 and under $600 10.6 AX ? $600 and over IO.O 7T The nationalities comprised in the preceding table are Scotch, Irish, Germans, Norwegians, French, Bohemians, Hebrews, Lithuanians, Poles, South Italians, and Syrians. As shown by the figures, the percentage of families with boarders and lodgers 3 decreases with the increase of earnings. 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, Table 38, p. 685; vol. ii, Table 45, p. 310. 1 The comparative value of the figures could not be affected by the 254 Immigration and Labor The same effect is produced by differences in rent. Among iron and steel workers "both the native and foreign households exhibit the smallest proportion having boarders or lodgers in the South." The reason is that rents are considerably lower in the South than in other sections of the country. 1 Of the South Italian iron workers in the Pittsburgh district 70.6 per cent keep boarders and lodgers, whereas in the Birmingham district there are only 3 per cent with boarders and lodgers. Among the Slovaks the percentages are respectively 43.9 and 15.0.* The United States Bureau of Labor has made a compari- son of the expenditures for rent per person in 3908 foreign and 7248 native "normal" families, which have no children of working age, nor any boarders or lodgers. The results for the North Atlantic and North Central States compare as follows: TABLE 75. AVERAGE ANNUAL RENT PER FAMILY AND PER INDIVIDUAL IN NORMAL FAMILIES, BY NATIVITY, IN NORTHERN STATES. 3 Nativity North Atlantic North Central Per family \ Per individual Per family Per individual Native $125.54 118.21 $33-25 29.09 $97.58 91.94 $2445 22.O2 Difference .... $7-33 $ 4-16 $5.64 $ 2.43 small proportion of married women working for wages who were found in only 5 per cent of all foreign-born households studied by the Immigra- tion Commission. 1 Cottages very similar to, but not so good as those for which the southern mill operatives pay a rent of $3.00 to $3.50 per month, rent in Southwestern Illinois at from $14.00 to $16.00 per month. (Ibid., vol. 9, p. 93.) a Ibid., vol. 8, p. 105. 3 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table V., H. and O., pp. 578, 589, 590. Other sections are omitted from this com- The Standard of Living 255 The difference in the amount of rent paid by native and foreign-born wage-earners amounts to fourteen cents a week per family or eight cents a week per person in the North Atlantic States and to eleven cents a week per family or five cents a week per person in the North Central States. This is the extent to which the scrimping on rent enables the average immigrant to underbid the native wage-earner in the labor market. In Table 75 all foreign-born are combined in one group. In Table 76 the foreign-born are distinguished by nationality for the country as a whole. TABLE 76. ANNUAL RENT PER FAMILY AND PER~INDIVIDUAL IN NORMAL FAMILIES, BY NATIVITY OF HEAD OF FAMILY.* Nativity of head of family Per family Per individual Native white: Foreign-born ... $112 III $29 27 Old immigration: Canada IOQ 27 England . . 125 JI 117 28 IIP ^O IOQ 26 New immigration : Austria-Hungary QO 22 Russia IOI 2*\ Ttalv.. Q7 2$ Another fundamental fact which has been noted by all students of the housing problem is that the wage-earner must expend more for rent in proportion to his income in a large city than in a small town. "Whereas the average outlay for rent in the income group $400-^500 in the city is $120 or $125, that in the country as a whole is $86.54."* The significance of this difference lies in the fact parison because the averages for natives in the South may be reduced by the inclusion of negroes. 1 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table V., J. and P., pp. 581 and 591 respectively. 3 Streightoff: The Standard of Living, p. 12. 256 Immigration and Labor that the recent immigrants are mostly concentrated in great cities, where rent is high, while the native American workmen predominate in small towns with low rents. So when the article produced by immigrant labor in a large city must compete in the market with the article produced by native American labor in a small country town, it is not the recent immigrant that is able to underbid the native American workman, but on the contrary the latter is in a position to accept a cheaper wage. 1 D. Food The Immigration Commission has expressed the opinion that "while it [the new immigration] may not have lowered in a marked degree the American standard of living it has introduced a lower standard which has become prevalent in the unskilled industry at large." 2 This conclusion rests solely on the meagre statistics which were collected by the Commission on the subject of housing. The inconclusive- ness of these statistics has been shown in the preceding section. The food expenditure which absorbs about two fifths of the workman's income, 3 was not included by the Commission in the regular program of its statistical investi- gation. Its reports contain but a few budgets picked up here and there in a casual way. It notes, however, "that, generally speaking, the expenditures for meat are consider- ably higher in the case of the more recent immigrants than in the case of the older immigrant races and the whites native-born of native father." 4 By way of illustration 1 The Industrial Commission found that the average rent paid by a family of a garment worker in the city was $8.95 per month for three rooms, whereas the country garment workers who did not own their houses paid on an average $4.59 for a whole house. (Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 730.) The difference in rent amount- ed to $4.37 per month, i. e., to $1.00 per week. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, p. 39. * Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, p. 96. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 356. The Standard of Living 257 the following items are quoted from some of the published budgets. The Magyar is a great consumer of meat. A butcher states that a group of eight Magyar men on an average eat 4 pounds of beef, 5 pounds of pork, 3 pounds of Polish sausage, and 4 pounds of veal, and often in addi- tion, bacon and ham and other cured meats, each day. (Thus on an average, each man eats 2 pounds of meat each day.) The Bulgarians. Among them bread is the staple article of diet. Each man will consume a three-pound loaf of bread per day. They also use a small quantity of meat each day, usually about a pound per man. (The experts of the Commission consider one pound a day per man "a small quantity." Few boarding houses patronized by university professors serve meat in greater quantities.) The kind of food consumed daily by a Bulgarian couple was about as follows 1 : Breakfast: Tea, cream, cheese, bread. Dinner: Bread, some kind of meat or stew. Supper: Bread, meat stew, or eggs. Presumably these budgets were published by the Immi- gration Commission, because they were regarded as representative. How do these food standards compare with the standard of the native American workingman? We may accept as the official definition of the American food standard the ration fixed by act of x Congress for enlisted men on the warships of the American navy. A specimen bill of fare prepared in accordance with the Navy ration prescribed by Congress, is as follows 2 : Breakfast : Baked beans, tomato catsup, bread, butter, coffee. 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission! vol. 9, pp. 82-96. a Frank J. Sheridan: "Italian, Slavic, and Hungarian Unskilled Immi- grant Laborers in the United States." Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor , No. 72, p. 466. 258 Immigration and Labor Dinner: Roast beef, brown gravy, string beans, sweet potatoes, cottage pudding, vanilla sauce, bread, coffee. Supper : Cold boiled ham, canned peaches, bread, butter, tea. Judged by this official standard, the Hungarian and Bulgarian workmen, with their daily fare of one or two pounds of meat per man, do not appear to have "intro- duced a lower standard." Concerning the Italians, material for a comparison of their food expenditure with that of native white Americans is furnished in the Report of the Immigration Commission on iron and steel manufacturing in the South. The Italians whose budgets were reported were all unskilled, earning from $7.50 to $12.50 per week, with the exception of one foreman of unskilled laborers, who was earning $15.00 and had an 1 8-year-old boy who contributed $7.00 a week to the family income. The Americans were all skilled mechanics with a weekly income of from $18.00 to $25.00, except one carpenter whose wages were $12.00 a week. In Table 77 the food expenditures of these families have been reduced to nutrition units per man per day according to the scale adopted by the United States Department of Agriculture. x Although the budgets secured by the investigation of TABLE 77. AVERAGE EXPENDITURE PER MAN PER DAY OF SELECTED FAMILIES OF SOUTH ITALIAN AND NATIVE WHITE WORKERS IN THE IRON AND STEEL DISTRICT OF THE SOUTH. 3 South Italian Cents Native White Cents No. 3 41 No. 13 62 No. 7 37 No. 10 36 No. 6 36 No. ii 36 No. 2 30 No. 9 32 No. 4 28 _ No. 12 29 1 For an explanation of the method used, see Robert Coit Chapin : The Standard of Living among Workingmen's Families in New York City, pp. 125-126. a For details see Appendix, Table XVII. The Standard of Living 259 the Immigration Commission included none for unskilled American workmen and only one for an Italian employed in a supervisory capacity, all the rest relating to unskilled Italian laborers, yet the preceding table shows that the food expenditure of the South Italian laborer is the same as that of the Southern white skilled mechanic. 1 A special investigation of the expenditures of single laborers in construction camps was made by the Bureau of Labor in 1906. Fresh and salt meats were found to be essential parts of the bills of fare of "Hungarian" and "Slav" 2 laborers. The same information was obtained concerning Hungarian laborers in an iron and steel plant in Ohio: "They used beef as a rule three times a day." At Hansford, Pa., the bill of fare of Hungarians and Slavs on week days was as follows : "Breakfast: Bread and coffee. Lunch: Four or five sandwiches (beef). Dinner in the evening: Soup, boiled or roast beef, one half to three fourths of a pound a head. Vegetables and coffee." According to Dr. Roberts, who has made a study of the conditions of labor in the anthracite coal mines, "the Slavs have good bread made of the best wheat or rye; they con- sume daily about a pound of beef for boiling or of fat pork or bologna sausage, a quantity of potatoes, cabbage, milk, coffee, and beer, butter and cheese, sugar, eggs, and fish." An earlier investigation made by the Bureau of Labor among the Slav and Hungarian workmen in the iron mines of Pennsylvania showed that, in 1890, their bill of fare included "two pounds of meat per man per day, one for dinner and one for supper." 3 1 The one exceptionally high average, 62 cents per man per day, was obtained from a native machinist, who was employed in the railroad shops at $23.00 per week and had only his wife and a small child de- pendent upon him. a The term "Hungarian" often comprises all immigrants from Hungary, most of whom belong to various Slav races. Bulgarians are also " Slavs." ? Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 72, p. 475. 260 Immigration and Labor With respect to Italians, a distinction must be drawn between families and single men, or married men whose families have remained in Italy. It is learned from the investigation of the Bureau of Labor, that men who are employed in construction camps live principally on vege- tables and reduce their expenditures to a minimum, in an effort to save as much as possible of their wages. Italian families, however, do not differ in the matter of food expenditures from families of other nationalities with the same income. Beside the budgets of the Immigration Commission which have been analyzed above, this fact is brought out in Professor Chapin's monograph on the standard of living among New York workingmen, based upon a canvass of 391 families in the summer of 1907. The following table, giving the classification of food expenditures by income and nationality, is compiled from Professor Chapin's budget statistics, the nationalities being arranged in the descending order of their average expendi- ture per man per day: TABLE 78. AVERAGE FOOD EXPENDITURES PER MAN PER DAY, BY INCOME AND NATIONALITY 1 Income group and nationality Expenditure Cents $600 to $699: Italian. 31.1 Bohemian 25.5 Teutonic 25.3 Austrian, Hungarian, and other S. E. European 24.0 Native white 23.9 Colored 23.5 Russian 23.1 Irish 20.8 $700 to $799: Italian 31.2 Irish 30.0 Teutonic 26.4 Native white 77 26.0 Colored 25.7 Austrian, Hungarian, and other S. E. European 25. 1 Bohemian 24.3 1 Robert Chapin, loc. cit., p. 141. The Standard of Living 261 Income group and nationality Expenditure Cents $800 to $899: Italian 33.9 Native white 32.4 Bohemian 30.2 Teutonic 29.5 Irish 26.5 $900 to $999: Native white 33.8 Teutonic 31.6 Italian 31.5 Irish 31.4 Austrian, Hungarian, and other Southeastern European 31.1 Bohemian 28.5 $1000 to $1099: Native white 38.1 Italian 34.3 Irish 32.0 Teutonic 31.9 The Italians in every income group expended more for food than the Hungarians and Slavs. In every income group below $900 per year, they expended more for food than any other nationality, including native Americans. 1 Among the families with an income from $900 to $1000, the Italians expended as much as the Teutons and the Irish, and more than the Bohemians who are regarded as "desir- able" immigrants. In the highest group the Italian ex- pended more than the Celts and the Teutons. According to Professor Underhill, of Yale University, who has made a study of the nutritive value of various foods, 22 cents per man per day must be regarded as the minimum upon which physical existence can be maintained. 2 It appears from the preceding table, that the Irish were the only race which denied themselves that minimum when their earnings were low. To sum up, Professor Chapin's analysis gives no indication of a sliding scale of racial standards of living. 1 All the native Americans but one were sons of native fathers, or of immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. The one exception was the son of a Bohemian father, but Bohemians are not among the "undesirable." Chapin, loc. cit., p. 39. a Chapin. loc. cit., p. 126. 262 Immigration and Labor The most extensive investigation of its kind, comprising more than 25,000 family budgets, was made by the United States Bureau of Labor ten years ago. Table 79, compiled from its report, is a comparative statement of food expendi- tures of "normal" families classified by annual income and country of birth. A "normal " family, it will be remembered, is one supported solely by the earnings of husband and father. All families with abnormally low incomes (under $400 annually) have been excluded from this comparison. No nationality with less than ten families in each income group is shown separately, but all foreign-born are included in the total. TABLE 79. EXPENDITURES FOR FOOD IN NORMAL FAMILIES WITH AN INCOME FROM $4OO TO $7OO, CLASSIFIED BY NATIVITY AND INCOME. r Income *4oo-$499 *500-JS99 *6oo-$699 Native white . . $212 $24.5 $260 Foreign-born 22Q 255 276 Old Immigration : Canada 228 25O fv 267 England 21^ 257 27O Ireland 21.1 26l 278 Sweden 217 24.8 271 Germany. . 224. 254. 277 New Immigration: Austria-Hungary Russia 252 27.5 *O4- 267 27*1 / / 289 2QT Italy 214. */O 275 ^91 26l * u o The lowest expenditures for food within the same income group were found among native white workmen with incomes under $500 and above $600; in the middle group the lowest place was held by the Italians, the next to the lowest by native white Americans. The highest expendi- 1 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table V D. PP- 560-563. The Standard of Living 263 tures were reported by the Russians in the two groups with incomes of $500 and over. In the lowest income group the highest expenditure for food was found among natives of Austria-Hungary, while the Russians were on a par with the English and above the Irish, the Canadians and the Germans. In the other two groups, the natives of Austria- Hungary expended more than the native Americans and more than any of the "old immigrants." The Italians expended more than the native Americans in the two extreme groups, and only $10.00 less per year, i. e., three cents a day less per family in the middle group. It is possible that the higher expenditure for food among the "undesirable" races is accounted for by the size of the family, but the earnings of the head of the family must cover the expense of supporting all its members. It is therefore, the total expense rather than the average per in- dividual that may, by supposition, affect the rate of wages. Still, if we turn to the comparative table of the same report in which the expenditure for food of native and foreign families is reduced to a uniform basis of units of consumption, 1 we observe the same tendency as shown by the comparison of total expenditures. We learn from that table: (1) That among the families having no children the natives of Russia expended $145.24 per one hundred units of consumption, while the natives of the United States expended only $119.85; (2) That among the families with two children, the Russians expended $107.35 as against $95.24 expended by Americans ; (3) That among families with three children, the average expense of the Russians was $108.11, whereas the Americans expended only $85.06; (4) That an Italian family with one child expended on an average $124.73, while an American family of the 1 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commission of Labor, Table V D., p. 102. 264 Immigration and Labor same size was contented with $109.94, a* 1 English family with $107.19, and a Norwegian with $87.53; (5) That an Austro-Hungarian family without children or with one child expended more for food than a Scotch family of the same size; (6) That an Austro-Hungarian family with two children needed $i 17.22, while a native American family of the same size could exist on $95.24, and an English family on $105.86; (7) That an Austro-Hungarian family with three children, expended $98.65 per one hundred units of con- sumption as compared with $85.00 expended by an average American family of the same size, and with $85.20 expended by an average English family; (8) That an Austro-Hungarian family with four or five children, expended more than a Scotch family; (9) That the Scotch were in every group inferior to the Russians; (10) That English families with less than five children had a lower expenditure for food than Russian families of equal size. 1 These budgets have been quoted here as the best evidence that has been collected on the comparative standards of living of native and foreign-bora wage-earners. Still, large as the number of individual families included in the canvass of the Bureau of Labor may look at a superficial glance, it affords too narrow a foundation for nice distinc- tions. Food expenditures vary with the size and the income of the family, and with geographical location affecting the prices of food-stuffs. If the food expendi- tures are to be compared by nationality, under uniform conditions as to location, size of family, and income, some of the groups must be so minute as to preclude the possibility of any reliable generalizations. The last table commented upon may serve as an illustration; among the foreign nationalities, there is no group of more than seventeen 1 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commission of Labor, p. 631, Table VIE. The Standard of Living 265 families, while most of the groups contain less than ten families, and twenty-one consist of only one family. Varia- tions in individual cases, however, are very wide. The only conclusion that is warranted by such statistics as are available is a negative one, viz., that the existence of a race standard of living determining the rate of wages for every race is not proven. 1 "The actual standard that prevails is set primarily by the wages paid and the prices charged." 2 E. Clothing In no other respect is the assimilation of the immigrant accomplished so rapidly as in the matter of dress. The mandates of Herbert Spencer's "ceremonial government" cannot be disobeyed. "Many of the recent immigrants," says the Immigration Commission, "still have some articles of clothing which they brought with them from Europe. Most of their clothing, however, practically all, is made in this country and purchased by them here." 3 The prices which the alien workman must pay in an American depart- ment store for shoes and clothes are fixed, not by his im- 1 In a later work, published in 1917, the chief expert of the Immigra- tion Commission seems to have come to recognize that the standard of living of the new immigrants is not lower than, but different from, that of the native wage-earners. Whereas the immigrant seeks primarily physical comfort, with the sophisticated American worker the con- ventional plays a conspicuous part in his family budget. To put it in Professor Lauck's words: "It is significant to note that all newer immigrants spend a greater proportion of their total expenditures for food than do the native wage- earners. This seems to be due to the fact that their standard of living is less subject to demands created by desires other than for food. In a sense, their standard is more elemental. They are more free to satisfy their natural physical wants, and less restricted than native wage- earners, by the pressure of other wants upon their income. In the selection of their diet it seems to be the consensus of observations that the newer immigrant has the advantage over the native wage-earners." W. Jett Lauck and Edgar Sydenstricker: The Condition of Labor in American Industries, p. 288. * Chapin, loc. cit. t pp. 249-250. 8 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, p. 8l. 266 Immigration and Labor ported individual or racial psychology, but by the Ameri- can manufacturer, the American railway manager, and the American department store proprietor, every one of them eager to make an American profit, in order to maintain an American standard of living for himself. The Immigration Commission secured the transcripts of store accounts, which showed that the prices paid for wear- ing apparel by immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe were the same as those advertised in Washington, D. C., by the department stores and tailor shops catering to the trade of government clerks. 1 The United States Bureau of Labor has published com- parative statistics showing for each nationality the average annual expenditure for clothing. It can be seen at a glance that the expenditure for clothing among the native, as well as among the foreign-born, increases with the increase of their earnings. 2 Whether, or not, the wage-earner's standard of living determines his wages, *. e., whether, or not, he is paid higher wages because he wears better clothes, it is self-evident that his ability to buy clothes is limited by his earnings. A comparison of race standards in the matter of clothing must therefore be made for workmen of the same earning capacity. Table 80 on page 267 follows the arrangement of Table 79. It can be seen from Table 80 that in each of the in- come groups the variations of expenditure by race are confined within very narrow limits, the margin between the highest and lowest expenditure not exceeding $10.00 a year. It is evident that such a margin is too small to produce an appreciable effect upon the rate of wages. 3 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, pp. 81, 84. * Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table V,D. * It must be borne in mind, that the numbers of families in each group being small, the variations may be due to differences in the size of the families, in geographical location, etc. ~Even the earnings may vary within each income group as much as $99.00 per year. Some allowance must be made for the inaccuracy of the figures, inasmuch as they are all mere estimates. The Standard of Living TABLE 80. 267 EXPENDITURE FOR CLOTHING IN NORMAL FAMILIES OF UNSKILLED LABORERS, CLASSIFIED BY INCOME AND NATIVITY. x Country of birth Income ^400-1499 $500-*599 J6oo-|6 9 9 Native $53 $66 $79 Foreign-born, generally . . . Old Immigration: 53 57 63 61 78 82 England 58 67 75 ci 61 7-1 Sweden 48 64 78 Germany 52 63 80 New Immigration : Austria-Hungary. . . . Russia 57 C2 6l 64 82 74. Italv . . C2 cy 7-1 F. Savings The expenses of a normal family for housing, food, and clothing amount in the aggregate to about three fourths of the total expenditure for all objects. 2 The preceding analysis has shown that the variations of these principal items of a workingman's budget are not affected by race. Table 81 on page 268 points in the same direction. It can be seen from the comparative figures that the average wage- earner's family of every nationality lives practically up to its income. A very small margin is left for savings. But while the native workman may save or spend at pleasure, the newly-arrived immigrant must save money. " Before the immigrant can realize any return from his labor in the form of American wages, he must incur the following expense or indebtedness, for even if one or all costs are prepaid for him by relative, friend, or other person, he eventually pays them all by deductions from his wages or otherwise: 1 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, pp. 560-563. 3 Ibid., p. 581, Table 5K. 268 Immigration and Labor TABLE 81. SURPLUS OF INCOME OVER EXPENDITURE OF NORMAL FAMILIES; CLASSIFIED BY COUNTRY OF BIRTH. 1 Country of birth Amount Per cent of income Native $ 37 5.6 26 4. 1 Old immigration: 41 6 I England 40 5.8 38 4.. 2 Germany 2^ 3.6 I5 2.6 New Immigration: Italy 2* 4.6 14. 2. 5 A 0.6 1. Cost of preparation at his home in Europe for the journey. 2 . Cost of transportation from his home to the European seaport. 3. Cost of emigrant head tax to his Government. 4. Cost of immigrant head tax to the United States Government. 5. Cost of steamship transportation, European port to the United States. 6. Cost of labor agency for securing employment at port of entry, if used. 7. Cost of transportation, United States port of entry to place of employment. 8. Cost of living from port of entry to place of destina- tion." 2 The cost of items 3-5 and 7 is further on estimated at $40.00 for a single Italian, Slav, or Hungarian immigrant. If the immigrant has left wife and children in his native country, he must save money to pay their passage. In order to meet these demands the immigrant must curtail his expenses for the necessities of life. This is accomplished 1 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, p. 581, Tables V, J and K. 9 Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 72, pp. 411-412. The Standard of Living 269 in various ways. Living in crowded tenements is one of them. Co-operative boarding, which has been given the odious name of "the boarding boss system," enables the Slav laborer to reduce his board bill much below the price the individualistic Anglo-Saxon has to pay in a boarding house, though, as has been shown, the fare under the co- operative system is at least as wholesome and abundant as in an average boarding house. The fact, however, that the immigrant who has no family in the United States is at first content to deny himself many comforts does not warrant the apprehension that he will be satisfied with a wage just sufficient to provide the bare necessities of life. The Italian railroad laborer who sub- sists on vegetables does not work for the mere price of his vegetables, but saves about 80 per cent of his wages. "Ninety-five per cent of the Italian laborers save from $25.00 to $30.00 of their wages per month. For eight months' work this would amount to over $200 per man." 1 It is a matter of general knowledge that large sums of money are annually sent home by the immigrants. A member of the Immigration Commission who visited a Greek mountain village from which two hundred immigrants had gone to the United States was told that each of the men sent back about $200 annually. 2 It was learned from the records of a post-office in a township of Russian Poland that thirty-seven workmen who had immigrated from that township to the United States sent home in 1903 the sum of 47,862 roubles, i. e., an average of $665 per emigrant. 3 That these are not isolated cases is indicated by the number of international money orders sent from the United States to Europe, which averaged, in 1907-1909, about three millions a year. 4 Moreover, hundreds of 1 Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 72, pp. 469-470, 477, 481. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 4 (in press). a Reports of the Warsaw Statistical Committee, Bulletin XXII. K. B. Vobly: General Analysis of the Statistics of Migration of Workers for Temporary Employment and of the Statistics of Emigration, p. 29. Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 37, p. 280. 270 Immigration and Labor thousands of immigrants annually return home, and their passage must be paid ,out of their savings. The total amount sent abroad by immigrants in the year 1907 is estimated by the Immigration Commission at $275,000,000. This estimate "does not take into account the large sums carried abroad by returning immigrants." 1 A better idea of the average amount an immigrant man- ages to save from his wages can be gained from the economic effects produced by the flow of American money into the rural districts of Southern and Eastern Europe. In Greece much of the money sent home by emigrants is for the payment of old debts and cancellation of mortgages, a considerable part ... for deposits, loans, the purchases of real estate or the improvement of property already owned. . . . Many houses were . . . built by money sent back by emigrants. . . . Usury is receding, fleeing from the glitter of abundant gold which has inundated towns and villages. . . . Nor is it surprising that the rate of interest should have fallen from 20, 15, and 10 per cent to 6 and 5 per cent.* Li Southern Italy, those who return from America pur- chase a house with a small estate. In Austria-Hungary, the enormous influx of money goes partly to pay old debts and to bring over families, but most of it to support rela- tives at home, to invest in land, to build homes, to make improvements, and to buy agricultural machinery. "The desire of the returning emigrant to invest in land has led to a considerable increase in its value, particularly in Croatia, Galicia, and the Slovak district of Hungary. ... In Galicia the buying of large estates by associations of emigrants has become a common practice. Very often from 50,000 to 90,000 acres a year are thus bought up and subdivided among the peasant purchasers. The money is either contributed from the savings of the associated peasants or borrowed from friends who are still in America. ' ' Reports from all emigration countries concur in the state- ment that the standard of living~of the peasants who have 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 37, p. 277. Ibid., vol. 4, p. 413. The Standard of Living 271 returned from the United States is above that of their neighbors. The roomy cottages built by them with money earned in the United States are in striking contrast with the surrounding poverty and dirt. In short, according to the Immigration Commission, the savings of the immigrants " are an important factor in promoting the general economic welfare of several European countries. " It is evident that the wages of the immigrants must needs be sufficient to enable them to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the uplifting of the economic conditions of their native countries, after paying American prices for all necessities of life. Viewed solely with an eye to the economic interests of the American wage-earner, the efforts of the average immigrant from Southern and Eastern Europe "to live upon the basis of minimum cheapness, and to save as much as possible," at the sacrifice of comfort, 1 is a matter of no concern to his competitors in the labor market. Whether he spends his wages on rent, food, and clothing, or saves his money to buy steamship tickets for his family, whether he deposits his savings in a local bank, or sends them to his parents for improving the home farm, his wants in one case are as great and as imperative as in the other, and he must demand a wage which will enable him to satisfy them. Furthermore, contrary to learned opinion, a wage- earner who is able to save four fifths of his earnings need not accept "employment on the terms offered or suffer from actual want, " for he can live four months on the savings of one, and is therefore "in a position to take exception to wages or working conditions" 2 a great deal more readily than the native wage-earner who lives to the limit of his income. This fact has been proved more than once in recent years by the long drawn out strikes of Southern and Eastern European mine and factory operatives. There is a tendency to view with disapproval "the send- ing back to the old country of the savings of the immigrant," upon the old Mercantilist theory that every dollar invested 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 183-184. a Ibid. 272 Immigration and Labor by him in his home country is a loss to the United States: "America, should have the productive influence of not only the labor but also of the capital made from the savings." 1 The same objection certainly applies with far greater force to the investment of American capital in foreign industrial enterprises. One important fact is overlooked in this objection, viz., that the money which is invested in the home farm provides for the relatives of the immigrant who stay in the old country. Were that money invested in the United States they would have to be brought over to the United States. While the capital invested in the United States would be increased, the supply of labor would like- wise be increased. Money being dearer in Europe than in the United States, the savings that are ample to provide employment for the immigrants' relatives at home, would be insufficient, if invested in American industries, to keep an equal number of persons employed in the United States. Their immigration would accordingly tend to increase the supply of labor out of proportion to the demand. The only economic interests affected in a real, not in an imaginary way, by the thrifty habits ("the low standard of living") of the recent immigrant, is the mercantile business which seeks the trade of the wage-earner as a consumer. With many manufacturing and mining concerns the commissary is an important part of the industry. In fact, [says the Immigration Commission] according to the statements of some of the small operators, commissaries as a rule return not only a 20 per cent net profit in normal times to the company, but the system goes so far as to largely determine the race of employees. In certain cases it was stated that negroes were preferred because their improvident habits prevented them from being able to live on a cash income, paid monthly, and thus forced them to draw their wages weekly, and even daily, in the form of commissary checks or store credits. Currency payments were made monthly partly for this purpose. As a result, the negroes are always a little in debt to the commissaries. . . . Their wants are confined to the supply-x>f goods furnished by the com- missaries, with the exception of whiskey, and they have no funds for 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit. t p. 16. The Standard of Living 273 any other purpose than that of bare subsistence .... For the same reason these employers do not encourage immigrant laborers, and in some cases refuse to employ them altogether. The immigrant exhibits a strong tendency to get his wages in cash and to live on the lowest level possible to maintain subsistence. . . . He seeks the cheapest places. ... A careful and detailed inquiry into a comparison of prices in the commissaries and in the city markets and groceries revealed a slight increase in the general run of prices in the former over the latter. 1 The Croatians are good livers in comparison with the other foreign races, and they do not stint themselves in food or drink [say Professors Jenks and Lauck]. Although extravagant, they do not, however, spend as much as the negroes, who loiter about the commissaries looking for something for which to spend their money. The Croatians know what they want and buy it freely, but if there is a surplus of their wages it is saved. The Italians, living as they do, very cheaply, buy little from the commissaries. In a general way the laborers are required to patronize the commissaries 3 . . . . From the point of view of the proprietor of the commis- sary store, an immigrant with a "low standard of living," who buys in the cheapest store, or saves his money instead of leaving it in the commissary, is, naturally enough, "undesirable." 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission^ vol. 9, p. 190. * Jenks and Lauck, he. tit., p. 176. CHAPTER XI HOME OWNERSHIP of homes by wage-earners has been advocated as a proposition of practical social reform, ever since the condition of labor has been recognized as a distinct social problem. The Immigration Commission has given a prominent place in its investigation to home ownership among immigrant races on the ground that "the proportion of the families in a given group of workmen who live in homes owned by themselves may fairly be regarded as an indication, at least, of the social and industrial progress of the group." 1 The Commission fully realizes "that the wage-earner is living and working in a large urban or industrial center where the acquisition of real estate is beyond his resources, " while in small mining towns "the industrial worker is practically not permitted to buy a home, but must live in a house owned by the operating company." 2 The mining companies find it "a better policy to retain the houses because of large profits arising from rent payments and for the additional reason that mine workers may be evicted in the event of a strike." 3 Moreover, the ownership of a home, even when within the reach of the wage-earner, often does not pay as an investment : If an employee should invest in a home near his work and for any reason he should be thrown out of work, the property would not be valuable, because there are no other industries near in which he could 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 7, p. 267. * Ibid., vol. I, p. 467. a Ibid., vol. 6, p. 452. 274 Home Ownership 275 find employment. The coal mines often have periods when work is irregular, or suspend operations for months at a time, which facts tend to make coal-mining labor migratory. 1 These conditions are not peculiar to coal mining alone, but exist generally. 2 Nevertheless, after all that is said, the Commission regards "the number and percentage of families owning their homes," as indications of "racial inclinations toward the acquisition of property." 3 It is noted that "the recent immigrant has no property or other restraining interests which attach him to a community," and the fact is officially recorded among the "salient char- acteristics of the recent immigrant labor supply," 4 This is an error. As far back as 1878, a noted New York philanthro- pist spoke in almost the same terms of the immigrants of his day, who were mostly Irish and Germans: They do not own the house nor any part of it, nor have any interest in it. ... The general effect of the system is the existence of a prole- taire class, who have no interest in the permanent well-being of the community, who have no sense of home, and who live without any deep root in the soil. 5 It is obvious that the subject of home ownership is viewed in these opinions from the standpoint of a middle-class resident of a rural community, not from that of a wage- earner. 6 A farmer, a shopkeeper, or a professional man, is l Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 7, p. 206. 8 An English writer who would encourage "the acquirement by work- ingmen of their homes," recognizes that "a difficulty exists in the fact that a large portion of the working classes are migrating, owing to the changes and irregularities of their means of livelihood." T. L. Worth- ington: Dwellings of the People, (26. edition, 1901), p. 60. ^Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I , p. 467. This view is ex- pressed with all due "qualifications," "reservations," and "limitations." *Ibid., pp. 498, 500 "This characteristic has both a good and a bad influence .... Probably, the bad effect of this characteristic is greater than the good, all things considered." Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit, p. 185. ^Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 459. *"The idea that the working man must buy his dwelling rests upon the reactionary conception that the condition created by modern large scale industry is a pathological degeneration, and that society must be forcibly steered against the stream which has been running for over 276 Immigration and Labor by the nature of his occupation attached to a certain com- munity. With him the ownership of a home is a profitable investment. Considered, however, from the point of view of the wage-earner who lives "in a town dominated by a single industry, home ownership would seriously hinder his defense of his rights in a disagreement with his employers." l In a small town, where many of the workmen own their homes trade-unionism means but little [to them]. If, however, trade-unionism becomes a factor and organization follows, with accompanying demands for shorter hours and more pay, these men would think long and well of their little homes . . . before engaging upon a strike, the outcome of which may possibly mean the loss of many things they greatly prize. It seems that the employers have the upper hand. 8 A wage-earner, on the contrary, who has no property interests attaching him to a certain community, is "free to follow the best industrial inducements." 5 Inasmuch, however, as the ownership of a home is re- garded "as a mark of thrift" 4 it is instructive to compare the extent of home ownership at present and in the past, be- fore "the Slav invasion," and still earlier, before immigration became a social factor in the United States. As early as 1790, when Boston had a population of 18,320, the average number of families to each house in the town was 1.46, which means that at least one third of all Boston families lived in rented houses, even on the assumption that all one-family houses were occupied by their owners and that in the two-family houses one dwelling was occupied by the owner. Half a century later, at the city census of 1845, the proportion of home owners in Boston was found to be only 17.5 per cent. 4 The population of Boston was then only 114,000, and the percentage of foreign-born and a century, into a condition . . . which is generally nothing but an ideal- ized restoration of the moribund small handicraft." Friedrich Engels: Zur Wohnungsfrage. 1 Streightoff, loc. cit., p. 84. Pratt, loc. tit., p. 99. 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 500. 4 Ibid., vol. 6, p. 451. * Census of Boston, 1845, p. 55. Home Ownership 277 their children born in Boston was 32.61. In other words, there were 67.39 per cent of native Americans of native parentage, of whom at most only one fourth owned their homes, even if there was not a single home owner among the foreign-born. The percentage of home owners has since slightly increased, as shown in the following table: TABLE 82. PER CENT OF HOME OWNERS IN THE POPULATION OF BOSTON, 1845-1900.* Year Per cent 1845 17-5 1890 18.43 1900 18.9 The most thorough-going statistical study of home owner- ship in the United States was made at the census of 1890. The data for that year reflect the standard of living of native Americans at a time when it could not have been affected by immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. It will be seen from Table 83 on page 278 that of all American householders of native stock who were living in cities with a population of from 50,000 to 250,000 in 1890, only a little over one fourth owned their homes; in larger cities the percentage was still smaller. And it must be borne in mind that these percentages relate to people in all walks of life, not to wage-earners alone. The prevailing "American standard" in cities is accordingly the standard of a tenant, not that of a home owner. 1 Census of Boston, pp. 26 and 37. The percentage of persons born of foreign parents in the United States outside of Boston could not have affected the situation, as appears from the fact that of the native children of foreign parents there were 10,105 under the age of 20 and only 80 over the age of 20. Evidently, immigration was new and the native children of foreign parents were still very young. a Report on Farms and Homes in the United States at the XI. Census, p. 32. XII. Census, Population, Part II., Table CVL, p. ccv. a The population of Suffolk County representing the economic, though not the municipal, Boston, included 19.36 per cent home-owners. 2 7 8 Immigration and Labor TABLE 83. PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE WHITE HOME OWNERS TO ALL OCCUPANTS, CLASSIFIED BY PARENT NATIVITY, IN CITIES WITH A POPULATION OF 50,000 AND OVER. 1 Population Per cent of 1 tome owners Native parentage Foreign parentage 50,000 to 250,000 27.6 26.4 250,000 and over 21.5 17.7 This fact is not due, however, to a racial disinclination of the American of native stock toward the acquisition of property, but to the fact that the value of a house is beyond the reach of the majority of householders. The proof will be found in Table 84: TABLE 84. PERCENTAGES OF HOME OWNERS CLASSIFIED BY VALUE OF HOMES, 1890." United Cities classifie d by population Value States 8,000 to 100,000 100,000 and over Under $500 O.6^ O.2I O.O4 $500 and under $1000 3.56 2.46 0.61 $1000 and under $2500 17.41 17.04. Q.24 $2500 and under $5000 22.^5 2e Q"* 17.05 $5000 and over "oo S6.o^ ^46 72.l6 More than one half of all homes in the United States were valued in 1890 at $5000 and over; in cities with a population of 100,000 and over the proportion of homes of the same value was nearly three fourths. The relative number of home owners decreased with the growth of the density of population and the resulting 1 Farms and Homes, XI. Census, Table 73, p. 204. ' Ibid., Table 39, p. 87 Home Ownership 279 increase of the value of real estate, as shown in Table 85, where all States and Territories are divided into two areas : I. With ratio of home owners to total families above the average for the United States; II. With ratio of home owners to total families below the average for the United States. TABLE 85. HOME OWNERSHIP AND VALUE OF REAL ESTATE IN AREAS WITH RATIO OF HOME OWNERS TO TOTAL FAMILIES ABOVE (I) AND BELOW (II) THE AVERAGE, Areas Per cent of home owners Population per square mile Average value per home (including incumbrances) I II 46.34 30-53 12 53 $ 2656 3828 To be sure, some of the homes were incumbered (three eighths of all homes in cities with a population of 100,000 and over, and less in smaller cities and towns 2 ), but the average incumbrance in the United States covered only 37.7 per cent of the value. 3 The average equity of the owner ranged from $3200 in cities with a population of 100,000 and over, down to $1400 in settlements of less than 8000 inhabitants. 4 Age is an important factor in home ownership ; under the age of forty-five the majority were tenants (see Diagram XVII) . s This was the rule in every section of the country, in those where the percentage of foreign-born was high, as well as in those where it was low. The percentage of home- owners increases with advancing years, and it is only in old age that a majority become home-owners. It takes a lifetime of savings to acquire a home. Now it must be remembered that most of the immigrants are under the 1 Farms and Homes, XI. Census, Table 16, p. 42. 2 Ibid., Table 14, p:34. J Ibid., Tables 104-106, pp. 421-428. Ibid., Table 38, pp. 83-86. s Ibid., p. 224, Diagram 32. 280 Immigration and Labor DIAGRAM XVII. PER CENT RATIO OF HOME OWNERS AND TENANTS TO UNDER 5 YEARS. 15, TO td UNITED STATES. o 10 to SO 40 So *0 la to -90 30 45 50 55 34 39 44 49 59 60 YEARS* OVER: YSSSSSSSSS/S/SS/SA TMC 58 CITIES or So.ooo POPULATION UNDER 25 YEARS. 15 TO *9 E 40 Owners Tenants age of forty-five on arrival. It was found in 1890, when immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was insig- nificant, that "by far the principal portion of the foreign- born owners of farms and homes have been in this country fifteen years and over." 1 Of all industrial workers from Southern and Eastern Europe, however, who were covered by the investigation of the Immigration Commission, only from 0.9 per cent (Roumanians) to 18.2 per cent (Russian Jews) had been in the United States fifteen years or over. 2 According to the standard set by the immigrants fromNorth- and Homes, XI. Census, p. 163. * Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit. t p. 477. ALL HOME FAMILIES, CLASSIFIED BY AGE PERIODS AND BY GEOGRAPHI- CAL DIVISIONS, 1890. NORTH CENTRAL. UNDK*5 YEARS. 15 TO 19 34 33 * 33 - 40 - 44 - 45 - 43 " 30-34 55 - 53 *0 YEARS &0VER; 30 40 *o TO. 90. ft 10* UNDER JtS YEARS. *3 TO 13 30 ^ 34 33 3d WESTERN. ,0 10 to JO 40 50 *0 70 90 100 NORTH ATLANTIC. o 10 fiO SO 40 SO 60 70 *0 90 U Tenants 281 282 Immigration and Labor ern and Western Europe, the overwhelming majority of the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe had not been long enough in the United States to have raised suf- ficient funds for buying real estate. The inference drawn from the statistics of home owner- ship in 1890 by the authors of the census report "is that home tenancy is increasing in the whole country as the urban population becomes numerically a more important element of the population." 1 The old American standard which found its expression in the one-family residence retreats before the apartment house. This tendency asserts itself even among the well-to-do who could afford to buy a home for the rental they pay for a fashionable apartment. The rate of the change can be observed in a city like Washington, which has but a small foreign popula- tion. 2 A count of the houses and apartments advertised in the Washington Star on the last Saturday in July, 1900 and 1910, for rent to white tenants brought the following results: TABLE 86. NUMBER OF HOUSES AND APARTMENTS ADVERTISED FOR RENT TO WHITE TENANTS IN WASHINGTON, D. C., ON THE LAST SATURDAY IN JULY, IQOO AND IQIO. For rent 1900 1910 Per cent of increase One-family houses 882 1169 j- Apartment houses 64 580 806 The number of apartment houses which advertised apart- ments for rent increased ninefold within ten years, while the number of one-family houses increased only by one third. 1 Farms and Homes, XL Census, p. 54. 3 The ratio of the foreign-born and their children to the population of Washington, D. C., was only 20.6 per cent in 1900 and 21 per cent in 1910. XIII. Census, vol. i, p. 150. Home Ownership 283 It is clear from this example that the tendency toward the apartment house or tenement house has no connection with immigration. It is in line with the general tendency toward concentration characteristic of modern times. 1 1 This has come to be recognized by industrial experts. In the opinion of Mr. Henry Wright, an architect who during the war was town planner of Emergency Fleet Corporation towns and has since made a study of housing conditions for the community planning committee of the American Institute of Architects, the time has come for "a scientific revolution of our methods of building houses." Speak- ing of the present housing situation to a writer for. the Globe of New York, he was quoted (in the issue of June I, 1920) to have said: " ' Own Your Own Home' campaigns to-day are essentially buncombe. They cannot provide houses for the laboring classes; under present conditions no one belonging to the laboring classes can afford to 'own his own home.' . . . We must do away with the old sales system and its single lot, single family house, and surplus street, and come to group and multi-family house building with its savings of billions for the country in street maintenance, constructional costs, and proportion of land to houses. " CHAPTER XII EFFECT OF IMMIGRATION ON WAGES THAT wages in many occupations are barely sufficient to provide for the necessities of life, has been estab- lished by all investigations of the cost of living. That unskilled labor receives a lower wage than skilled labor, is a truism. That the standard of living of unskilled laborers must be lower than that of skilled mechanics, is the neces- sary consequence of the difference in the rates of their compensation. Inasmuch, however, as the skilled me- chanics are mostly native Americans and older immigrant^, whereas the unskilled laborers are mostly new immigrants, the average man with a prejudice against the foreigner overlooks the difference in the grade of the service rendered, and jumps to the conclusion that the American mechanic commands higher wages because he insists upon maintain- ing an American standard of living, whereas the foreign unskilled laborer is willing to accept lower wages, because he is satisfied with a lower standard of living. It has been shown, however, that the standard of living ofjbhe^new immigrants is not lower than that of ^ decessors in the same grades of employment, or than that of the present generation of native Americans engaged in unskilled labor in the South, where there is practically no competition of immigrant labor. Granting that the standard of living determines the rate of wages, there is no escape from the conclusion that thejyagesjof the new immigrants can not be lower than those of the pasfgenera- tion of immigrants wEoTm their day were engaged in un- 284 Effect of Immigration on Wages 285 skilled labor. In other words the logical deduction from the premises is, that the new immigration could not have depressed the rate of wages. On the other hand, though the standard of living of the native or Americanized foreign-born wage-earners be higher than that of the new immigrants, this difference is not necessarily indicative of a higher rate of wages: the higher \ standard may be maintained on the earnings of several members of the family. As a matter of fact, present-day industrial families in the United States find it necessary to add to the earnings of the husband through the employment of wives and children outside the home and the keeping of boarders and lodgers within the home. The native American and older immigrant employees maintain an independent form of family life, but the earnings of the heads are supplemented by the wages of the wives and children. On the other hand, the Southern and Eastern European families have recourse to the keeping of boarders and lodgers as a supplementary source of family income. . . . That contributions of children are less general in the latter class of families is probably due to the fact that children of these households have not in any consider- able proportions reached working age. x It is argued that the newly-arrived immigrant must have work at once and is therefore eager to accept any terms: Another salient fact in connection with the recent immigrant labor supply has been the necessitous condition of the newcomers upon their arrival in America's industrial communities. Immigrants from the South and East of Europe have usually had but a few dollars in their possession when their final destination in this country has been reached. . . . Consequently, finding it absolutely imperative to engage in work at once, they have not been in a position to take exception to wages or working conditions, but must obtain employment on the terms offered or suffer from actual want. a Still, the investigations of the United States Bureau of Labor have shown that only one half of the families of na- tive American wage-earners (51.25 per cent) are able to save, whereas one third (32.2 per cent) are barely able to 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 157-158, 161. 3 Ibid., pp. 183-184. 286 Immigration and Labor make both ends meet, and about one in every seven (15.55 per cent) have a deficit. x Only after the annual income of the native American wage-earner with a normal family has reached $700 is there a surplus left over average expenses. 2 Making allowance for unemployment, an annual income of $700 may be taken as equivalent to about $2.50 a day, which is approximately the dividing line between skilled and unskilled labor. It thus appears that one half of the native American wage-earners, or roughly speaking all unskilled laborers, have no savings and are therefore in the same "necessitous condition" as "the newcomers upon their arrival": they "must obtain employment on the terms offered or suffer from actual want. " The terms of competi- tion are therefore not changed by the arrival of the immigrant. It is further argued that the immigrant is at a particular disadvantage, being a stranger in a strange land : The immigrant unfamiliar with American conditions, often not even understanding the language in which he must make his contract, and ignorant of the working methods which are new to him, while naturally preferring the best that he can get, is often willing to work under conditions and at wages which would not appeal to American working- men, but which to him seem ample and satisfactory, because they are so much better than he has ever known before. Moreover, when the wage-earner is one unfamiliar, as are most immigrants, with American conditions, he is likely to be eager, perhaps too eager, to secure work at almost any wage above that affording a mere subsistence. Usually he is not in touch with the American workingman or with trade unions, and does not know what he could do by proper effort. He is not a member of their trade organization, and cannot bargain through officials who know the conditions. Moreover, if he is one who is expecting as soon as possible to return to his home country with his savings, what he dreads most of all is lack of work, and he is willing to take low wages and bad working conditions, rather than be idle even for a short time and see any of his savings disappear. In the large majority of cases, doubtless, the immediate inducement to the emigrants to leave home and sail for America comes in the form of a personal letter from friends or members of their own families already in t^e United States. It is thus 1 Sixteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, p. 68. 3 Ibid., p. 592. Effect of Immigration on Wages 287 that they learn of the much higher wages and the better living condi- tions ; and usually they are practically sure of a job almost as soon as they arrive, at wages which seem to them more than satisfactory. 1 This statement contains its own refutation. If the immigrants "usually are practically sure of a job almost as soon as they arrive," then there is no occasion for them 1 'to be eager to secure work at almost any wage, etc." Since "in the large majority of cases" the immigrants come in response to "a personal letter from friends or members of their own families already in the United States," it is erroneous to say that they are "not in touch with the American workingman, " unless the term "American" be used in the narrow sense of native American. But the immigrant loses nothing in a pecuniary way by not being in touch with the native workman, since the latter usually works at a skilled trade, whereas the former in most cases seeks employment as a common laborer. On the other hand, in all establishments employing immigrant labor the new applicant, as a rule, finds some one through whom he makes his contract in his native language. It has been shown in the discussion of the standard of living that the new immigrant has obligations which do not permit him "to work at any wage above that affording a mere subsist- ence." As for affiliation with trade unions, it must be borne in mind that they comprise only a small minority of all wage-earners, native as well as foreign-born, and are mostly confined to skilled trades, whereas most of the immigrants are unskilled. Lastly, it is recognized by the Immigration Commission that "it is inaccurate to speak of the immigrant population as being only tempor- ary in this country": most of the recent immigrants come to stay. 2 IS The object for which the Immigration Commission was created was to supply statistical facts which should take 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. tit., pp. 18-19. a See sw/>ra, p. 74. Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, P- 657- 288 Immigration and Labor the place of speculation. After a study of the racial composition of the operating forces in the principal indus- tries, based upon information received for more than half a million wage-earners in mines and manufactures, the Commission discovered no evidence "that it was usual for employers to engage recent immigrants at wages actually lower than those prevailing at the time of their employment in the industry where they were employed." 1 One of the most striking facts indicated by a comparison of the earnings of the races in the different industries [say Professors Jenks and Lauck] is that earning ability is more the outcome of industrial opportunity or conditions of employment than of racial efficiency and progress. This fact becomes evident when the average weekly earnings of the members of a race, or several races, in the cotton or woolen and worsted goods industry, are considered in connection with the earnings of the same race or races in other industries. The Lithuanians, for example, earn an average of $12.24 weekly in the manufacture of agricultural implements and vehicles, $11.60 in clothing, $13.60 in copper mining and smelting, $9.87 in furniture, $12.89 m iron and steel, $11.98 in iron-ore mining, $9.50 in leather, $12.85 m oil refining, $10.87 in shoes, $10.67 ' m sugar refining, but only $7.86 in cotton and $7.97 in woolen and worsted manufacturing. The same condition of affairs is shown by other races in different industries. a That the economists who directed the investigations of the Immigration Commission regard it as a "striking" fact that earning ability is the outcome of economic con- ditions rather than of racial characteristics, indicates that they expected to find the opposite, viz., that earning ability was determined by racial factors.. Yet, notwithstanding the "evident fact" brought to light by the investigations of the Commission, that individuals of the same race, with presumably the same "racial standards," are paid varying rates of wages in different industries, the Commission per- sists in the view that the rate of wages is determined by the standard of living of the wage-earners. The statistics of the Commission show that the earnings of the immigrants 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, pp. 494, 541. 3 Jenks and Lauck, he. cit., pp. 145-146. Effect of Immigration on Wages 289 increase with the length of residence in the United States; there is a ready explanation that "the immigrants of long residence have acquired a higher standard of living and, consequently, demand a higher wage." 1 It would seem as though wages were regulated in accordance with the communistic ideal, "to everybody according to his wants." The question arises, however, why should the employer grant the demand of the immigrant of long residence for a higher wage when there is said to be an "oversupply" of recent immigrants willing to accept "almost any wage above that affording a mere subsistence"? The statistics of the Commission give no answer to this question, because the basis of its classification is race, not character of employ- ment, each race being treated as a homogeneous unit. The real explanation of the variation in wages among individuals of the same race is that the immigrant of long residence has advanced on the scale of occupations and is paid a higher wage for a higher grade of labor. Since he receives a higher wage, he has "consequently" acquired a higher standard of living. The primary cause which has determined the movement of wages in the United States during the past thirty years has been the introduction of labor-saving machinery. The effect of the substitution of mechanical devices for human skill is the displacement of the skilled mechanic by the unskilled laborer. This tendency has been counteracted in the United States by the expansion of industry : while the ratio of skilled mechanics to the total operating force was decreasing, the increasing scale of operations prevented an actual reduction in numbers. The growing demand for unskilled labor was supplied by immigration. 2 Of course, 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 2, p. 370. 9 Prof. Commons, in the Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 305, says: "In manufactures, mining, and transportation there has been a rapid advance in machinery and a better organization and division of labor, whereby the resources of the country are made more productive. This advance in machinery and division of labor often appears in itself to be a means of displacing labor and so of 290 Immigration and Labor this readjustment did not proceed without friction. While, in the long run, there may have been no displacement of skilled mechanics by unskilled laborers in the industrial field as a whole, at certain times and places individual skilled mechanics were doubtless dispensed with and had to seek new employment. As the unskilled laborers who replaced them were naturally engaged at lower wages, and as most of them were immigrants, the change reflected itself in the minds of the displaced American mechanics as substitution of cheap immigrant labor for highly paid American labor. The English, Scotch, Welsh, and Irish miners, e. g. t for some time successfully resisted the introduction of machin- ery. Their resistance was overcome by the employment of Slavs and Italians. The impression was thus created that the introduction of machinery was the effect of Slav and Italian immigration. According to Professors Jenks and Lauck, "the lack of skill and industrial training of the recent immigrants in the United States has stimulated the invention of mechanical methods and processes which might be conducted by unskilled industrial workers as a substitute for the skilled operatives formerly required." 2 This idea had been anticipated by Mr. Leiserson, who expressed the belief that one of the effects "of the influx of Slavs is that lack of intelligence makes improved machinery and a perfected organization of the mining processes abso- lutely essential. There is a direct connection* between the increasing number of unintelligent mining laborers and the use of mining machinery during the last ten or fifteen years." The author is ready to accept at face value the contention of the coal operators "that the scarcity of intelligent labor compelled them to adopt machinery wherever possible. ' ' 3 Presumably, but for the immigration depressing wages, and such would be the case if industry as a whole were not continually expanding. " 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., pp. xxiii., xxxiv. 2 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 186-187. William M. Leiserson: "Labor Conditions in the Mines of the Pitts- Effect of Immigration on Wages 291 of the "unintelligent" Slavs, American industry might have gone on forever without improved machinery, and in- stead of perfecting the organization of the mining processes the mine operators would have encouraged the "arts and crafts" movement in bituminous coal mining. This theory ignores the elementary proposition of po- litical economy, that the main object of labor-saving machinery is to dispense precisely with "intelligent," i. e., high-priced labor, and that, on the contrary, an abundant supply of cheap labor would retard the introduction of improved machinery. 1 The conditions in the coal mines of West Virginia may serve as an example: "The low level of wages in West Virginia may be inferred from the low rate of intro- duction of machinery , ' ' says Prof. John R . Commons . This fact, according to him, is of special significance because burgh District." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March, 1909, pp. 318-319. 1 " If labor is cheap . . . somewhat more labor will be employed and somewhat less machinery installed. ... If wages are high . . . more machinery will be introduced and somewhat less labor employed." C. J. Bullock, Assistant Professor of Political Economy in Harvard University, The Elements of Economics, pp. 79-80. "Higher wages for labor will induce entrepreneurs to economize in the use of labor. . . . In the printing industry, for example, a rise in wages would make it profitable for employing printers to use more labor-saving machinery." Outlines of Economics, by Richard T. Ely, Professor of Political Economy in the University of Wisconsin, revised and enlarged by the author and Thomas S. Adams; MaxO. Lorenz, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science in the University of Wisconsin; Allyn A. Young, Ph.D., Professor of Economics in Leland Stanford Junior University (New York, 1909), p. 369. "Every rise of wages will have a tendency to determine the saved capital in a greater proportion than before to the employment of machinery. Machinery and labor are in constant competition, and the former can frequently not be employed until kbor rises." David Ricardo: Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (London, 1891), p. 386. "Where abundance of cheap labor . . . can be obtained, . . . the development of machinery has been generally slower. " John A. Hobson: The Evolution of Modern Capitalism, p. 69; also p. 81. Cf. also Karl Marx: Capital, Book I., Chapter XV: Machinery and Modern Industry, Sec. 2. 292 Immigration and Labor ''the miners of West Virginia are mainly native Americans, who have only recently turned from home industry to mining." 1 It is patent that the movement of labor from agriculture to mining and manufactures would, even in the absence of all immigration, have overcome the resistance of the English-speaking miners to the introduction of machinery. The number of mines is not fixed. New mines are con- tinually being opened. The operator of a new machine- equipped mine need not face the resistance of old pick- miners; he can engage an entirely new force of operatives, free from any traditions. His competition will ultimately force the owners of old mines to introduce machinery or go out of business. The resistance of English-speaking miners might have some time been strong enough to prevent the introduction of machinery, but at no time could it have forced a mine operator to run his mine at a loss. The shutting down of the unprofitable mines would have put an end to the resistance of the pick-miners. Absence of immigration might have retarded the growth of American industry, but it could not have checked the introduction of machinery. Machinery has so radically changed the technique of all industries that a comparison between past and present wages is beset with extreme difficulties. Many old occu- pations are gone, and even though the name may have remained the same, the substance has changed: a steel- worker to-day is not the same as a steel- worker thirty years ago. 2 A comparison of average wages or earnings for two different periods may therefore be quite misleading. It is possible for the average to show a decrease, though in reality the wages may have increased. This will be clear from the following example in which all figures are purely 1 Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 410. For a discussion of this subject see R. Mayo-Smith: Statistics and Economics, pp. 91-102. (Publications of the American Economic As- sociation, vol. iii., Nos. 4, 5.) Effect of Immigration on Wages 293 arbitrary. Suppose, the working force of a mill in 1882 consisted of 1000 men, of whom 750 were skilled mechanics whose wages averaged $3.50 a day, and 250 were unskilled laborers hired at $1.25 a day. The average wage for all mill workers was, accordingly, $3.00 per day. Suppose, further, that in the thirty years that have elapsed since, the business of the mill has grown and two new departments have been added, with 1000 men in each. But owing to the installation of new machinery the same 750 skilled me- chanics have been distributed over the three plants, and the additional force of 2000 men consists solely of unskilled labor- ers. Suppose, the wages of the skilled mechanics have been raised from $3.50 to an average of $5.00 per day, and the wages of unskilled laborers from $1.25 to an average of $2.00 per day. The average for the three plants, however, would be $2.75 per day, i. e., twenty-five cents less than thirty years ago, notwithstanding the substantial gain in the wages of all employees. The same defect is inherent in the latest refinements of the average, the "median," the "quartile," the "decile," etc. Moreover, our wage statistics present a huge mass of fragmentary and heterogeneous data, which in their present undigested form "are well-nigh inaccessible." 1 The use 1 Hearing : Wages in the United States, p. 7. The defects of our wage statistics are well stated by Professor Nearing in the following paragraphs: "At every turn the need arose for an accurate, concise statement of the wages being paid in the various parts of the United States, yet to date no study has been made which supplies the need. Ryan's Esti- mate is old, and at best incomplete; Mrs. Moore's statement, like the statement in the 1903 Report of the Commissioner of Labor, is of standards of living primarily, and only incidentally of wages. In neither case is the ground covered sufficiently to warrant valuable wage deductions. The Wage Study accompanying the Census of 1900 is old, and rather inadequate, as the compilers themselves point out. . . . The available data on the subject of wages exist chiefly in the reports of State bureaus of labor, and are unfortunately of such a nature as to render comparison with data of a decade since (in the few cases where such data exist) most unsatisfactory. . . . New York wage statistics 294 Immigration and Labor of wage statistics, such as they are, for an analysis of the effects of immigration on wages is restricted by lack of comparable statistics of occupations by nativity. 1 On the other hand, a rise or a fall in money wages is no indication of an increase or decrease of the resources of the wage-earners, unless coupled with comparative statistics of the cost of living. The various index numbers of prices^ however, admit of a wide margin of error. An illustration is furnished by the curve plotted by Mr. Streightoff from the figures of the United States Bureau of Labor on "real wages." 2 It appears that during the period from 1890 to 1907, the purchasing power of full-time weekly wages was at its maximum in 1896, when, according to the statistics of the Massachusetts Bureau, the ratio of unemployment was as high as during the crisis year I9o8; 3 the country had relate to members of labor unions only; the average wage statistics of Pennsylvania are incomplete even those cited are wretchedly compiled and presented; Illinois has published no recent statement of wages except in department stores; Missouri, Michigan, and Indiana publish little or no wage data. The statistics for Ohio are excellent, but very diffuse and unconcentrated. . . . Therefore, of the ten leading indus- trial States, three present worthy wage data; the statistics of two are far from satisfactory; while five of the ten States furnish no current wage material of value to this study. Deplorable as is the lack of statistics in these great industrial States, the conditions in the country at large are infinitely worse. Of the forty-seven States of the Union, not more than five publish up-to-date wage statistics. Of the remaining States, a score publish statistics of average wages only, which, in some cases, are so unrepresentative as to be valueless. ' ' (Pp. 9-15.) "The last Bulletin of the Federal Bureau of Labor relating to wages was published in 1908. . . . The material as a whole permits of practically no deduction, save that wages are considerably higher in the West than in any other section of the country, and that the wages in some trades are very much higher than in others." (Pp. 138-139.) * For example, though the average wages of coal miners can be com- puted from census statistics for every State, it is impossible to ascertain for many States the percentage of Slavs among coal miners, because coal miners are combined in census statistics with metalliferous miners and quarrymen. 2 Streightoff, loc. cit., Chart XI. See Ch. VI., Table 23 and Diagram IX. Effect of Immigration on Wages 295 not recovered from the effects of the crisis of 1893-1894, and the industrial situation was again disturbed by the uncer- tainty of a Presidential campaign fought on one of the most vital economic issues, the money question. No trust can be placed in statistics which lead to conclusions so glaringly at variance with facts still fresh in people's memory. Overlooking, however, the inadequacy of our wage statistics, let us examine the material, such as it is, bearing upon the relation between immigration and wages. We have seen that in the 40*3 the wages of Irish street laborers in Brooklyn were insufficient to provide for rent, and they were compelled to live in shanties. Bad as the housing accommodations of the Italian street laborers may be to-day, they nevertheless earn enough to pay rent, which is indisputable proof of an increase in "real wages." A generation later, a statistical inquiry into the earnings of 75,000 wage-earners in the State of Massachusetts led the Bureau of Labor Statistics to the conclusion that "the average earnings of a majority of the skilled laborers in this State do not reach the average cost of the necessities of life, " with the result that "the children of the poor are taken away early from school, and brought into the labor market ; the son to the factory, store, or shop, and the daughter to the life and wages of a factory or cash girl, or of a serving woman. ' ' a Evidently the skilled mechanics forty years ago did not fare better than the wage-earners of our own day. In the same report there is a comparison of earnings and expenses in Massachusetts for 1800, 1830, and 1860. It is estimated that in 1800 the master mason alone of all crafts- men earned more than his expenses, whereas master carpen- ters and master painters could not pay their expenses; journeymen carpenters, masons, and painters were in the same category. In 1 830 a journeyman mason earned barely 1 New York Weekly Tribune, May 2, 1846. Quoted in Documentary History of American Industrial Society, vol. viii., pp. 225-226. a Third Annual Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor (1871-1872), pp. 531-532- 296 Immigration and Labor enough to support a family of four, but the earnings of a journeyman carpenter were still insufficient to provide for a family of the same size. The wages of a laborer were esti- mated at $226 a year, which was equivalent to a little over one half of the estimated expenses of an average family of four persons. In 1860 neither a master carpenter, nor a master painter earned enough to support a family; no journeyman in the building trades was able to support a family solely on his own earnings. The earnings of a common laborer remained, as thirty years before, at a little over one half of the estimated cost of supporting a family. 1 The Bureau of Statistics of New Jersey in its early days published a number of workmen's budgets. A compilation of the data for 1885 will be found in the Appendix, Tables XIX. and XX. The workmen were either native, or immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. Immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was still too insignificant to affect the labor situation. It appears that of all wage-earn- ers in specified occupations only glass-workers and black- smiths earned enough to support on their wages an average family of about five persons. Other skilled mechanics, such as machinists and carpenters, needed the assistance of mem- bers of their households to support a family of the same size, while workers in textile mills could not meet expenses even with the assistance of members of their families. Among unskilled laborers there were some whose earnings were sufficient to support their families, but their expenses averaged only $i a day. Those families whose expenses averaged about $1.50 a day or more were barely able to keep above water with the aid of the children's earnings. None of the Irish laborers could make both ends meet, although their expenses were somewhat below those of the other English-speaking laborers. There are similar budget data in the report of the Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics for 1885. In a few trades, the 1 Third Annual Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor, (1871-1872), pp. 514-517. See Appendix, Table XVIII. Effect of Immigration on Wages 297 average earnings were insufficient to provide for the support of the wage-earner and his family. The average deficit per family for each occupation is shown in Table 87 : TABLE 87. AVERAGE ANNUAL DEFICIT PER WORKING FAMILY IN OHIO, BY OCCU- PATIONS, 1885.* Occupation Persons in family Annual deficit Stone-cutters 5.O $ 2 Machinists 42 4 5 _5 Iron-workers 5.7 66 Wood -carvers 5-6 lit Cigar-makers 4.8 114 Miners 5-8 IIQ Among the skilled mechanics the stone-cutters and the machinists were on the border line between surplus and de- ficit; the cabinet-makers, wood-carvers and cigar-makers depended upon outside sources, in addition to their wages ; likewise the iron-workers and the miners. The proportion of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe in those occupations five years later varied in Ohio between 2.1 and 5.3 per cent. One fact may be taken as firmly established by the pre- ceding statistics, fragmentary and insufficient as they are for other purposes, viz., that in the days of "the old immi- gration*' the wages of unskilled laborers, and even of some of the skilled mechanics, did not fully provide for the support of the wage-earner and his family in accordance with their usual standards of living. The shortage had to be made up by the wife and children. If the tendency of the new immigration be to lower the rate of wages or to retard the advance of wages, it should be expected that wages would be lower in great cities where the recent immigrants are concentrated, than in rural dis- tricts where the population is mostly of native birth. All ' See Appendix, Table XXI.; 2Q8 Immigration and Labor wage statistics concur, however, in the opposite conclusion. Though the census reports have since 1900 repeatedly warned against the use of census returns for the computation of average earnings, yet the defects of the census statistics of wages do not preclude a fair comparison between the earnings of urban and rural factory operatives. The average number of wage-earners in either case has been computed on a uniform basis of 300 working days per wage- earner. While individual returns may be mere estimates of questionable accuracy, yet these defects are insufficient to obscure a pronounced tendency, such as shown in Table 88. TABLE 88. AVERAGE EARNINGS OF FACTORY WORKERS, FOR A YEAR OF 30O WORKING DAYS, 1904.' Location Men Women ChUdren Urban Rural $566 479 $307 264 $186 158 An examination of previous census reports on manufac- tures as far back as 1870 proves that since the United States has become a manufacturing country average earnings per worker have been higher in the cities than in the country. 2 The effect of this difference is "that the country competi- tion of native Americans where the cost of living is low often acts as a depressing effect on wages in the same occupation in cities. ' ' 3 Prof. Commons gives the following explanation 1 Computed from the Report of the Census of Manufactures, 1905, Part I., United States by Industries, Table I., p. xxxv. 2 See XII. Census Reports. Manufactures, Part I., pp. ccxx., ccxxi., Tables IV.-VI. ; p. cclix., Tables XXVII. and XXVIII. This difference might be accounted for in part by the employment of relatively greater numbers of women and children in smaller cities and rural settlements. The effect upon the wage situation, however, is the same, whether the better paid workman of the city is underbid by a man, woman, or child employed in a country town. 3 Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. xxiv. Effect of Immigration on Wages 299 of "the pressure to reduce wages" which "proceeds from the cheaper labor of country districts employed in the same line of production'*: Wages are necessarily higher in cities than in the country for the corresponding standard of living. In the city there are such additional demands as car fare, the food costs more and must be paid for in cash, because the laborer does not have his patch of ground from which, by the help of wife and children and by his own extra work mornings and evenings and idle days, he can secure a large share of his necessary food supplies. 1 In other words, the American wage-earner in a country district gives more of his time to making a living than the city worker. The same difference exists within the same trades between the large cities and the smaller cities. The Industrial Commission, in its volume on immigration, quotes the following from the reports of the New York Bureau of Labor: Wages at the present time (in 1898) are good throughout the large cities, where it must be barne in mind the men employed in the building trades have themselves ueen immigrants. In the smaller cities, where the wages are much less than in the larger cities, it is the older American labor which controls the field. 3 Another way to trace the connection, if any, between immigration and wages, is to compare the average earnings by States with reference to the percentage of foreign-born ; if immigration tends to depress wages, this tendency will manifest itself in lower average earnings for States with a large immigrant population, and vice versa. No such tend- ency is disclosed by wage statistics. In Tables 89 and 90 the average earnings of male and female wage- workers above the age of sixteen in the principal manufacturing States are collated with the percentages of all foreign-born and of Southern and Eastern Europeans of the same sex engaged in manufactures and mechanical pursuits. Southern States 1 Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 316. * Ibid ., p. 426. 300 Immigration and Labor where the negroes constitute more than 10 per cent of all persons of both sexes engaged in manufactures have been excluded from this table, in order to eliminate the influence of negro competition upon the average earnings. x TABLE 89. AVERAGE ANNUAL EARNINGS OF MALE EMPLOYEES IN MANUFACTURES, COLLATED WITH THE PERCENTAGES OF FOREIGN-BORN, IN THE PRINCIPAL STATES, IQOO. Average annual Per cent of all ma and mechar les in manufactures deal pursuits State earnings Foreign-born Southern and Eastern Europeans Colorado $ 630 38 "i IO O California 589 -14.4. 4 5 Washington 578 14. Q 3-1 New York 558 44 O o TC 4. New Mexico 1 27 O 6 8 Connecticut S^O f 'j? 41.6 8 6 Illinois C-IQ 4.4. 7 8 7 Massachusetts . . 527 ** / xfiA-i 4 8 New Jersey CIQ Hi 94. Oregon 5l8 28.8 2 I Pennsylvania KH i-i 2 T-5 4. Nebraska. . cio *O 7 30 Kansas 4QC IO 1 30 Rhode Island 4.8 5 47. 5.1 Delaware 4.71 17 7 4 A Texas AAX */ / 18 Q 2 2 No definite relation between wages and immigration can be deduced from the preceding tables. States with widely differing percentages of foreign-born male operatives have the same average earnings, e. g., Illinois, Connecticut, and New Mexico, while States with the same percentages of foreign-born male wage-earners widely differ with respect to rates of wages, e. g. , Colorado and New Jersey. Higher *XII. Census. Manufactures, Part I., p. cxv., Table XXXIX.; Population, Part I., pp. cii.-civ., Table XLVL; p. cvi., Table XLVIII., also p. cxiv., Table LIIL Effect of Immigration on Wages 301 percentages of foreign-born go together with higher average earnings, e. #., Rhode Island has more than twice as many foreign-born in proportion as Texas, and the rate of wages in Rhode Island is higher than in Texas. And, on the con- TABLE 90. AVERAGE ANNUAL EARNINGS OF FEMALE EMPLOYEES IN MANUFACTURES, COLLATED WITH THE PERCENTAGES OF FOREIGN-BORN, IN THE PRINCIPAL STATES, IQOO. State Average annual earnings Percentage of all foreign-born females in manufactures and mechanical pursuits Colorado . $ W Id O Massachusetts .... -IIQ do 6 Washington o'-y Il6 10 o Rhode Island . . 1O4 IQ C C onn ect ic u t 102 27 O New York o^-* 208 2Q 6 Illinois . ... 288 26 I California 27Q 17 O New Jersey '9 276 25 1 Pennsylvania 262 11 O Nebraska 258 15.8 New Mexico . 2^5 30 Texas 251 IO d Oregon 24.Q 12.1 215 6.6 Delaware 211 6.7 trary, lower percentages of foreign-born go together with higher average wages, e. g. t Kansas and Rhode Island. Neither does immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe appear to affect the average earnings. New York with the highest percentage of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe has a higher average than Oregon with the lowest percentage of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. The average earnings of women likewise bear no definite relation to the per cent of foreign- born breadwinners. In Massachusetts, which has the maximum per cent (40.6) of foreign-born breadwinners in 302 Immigration and Labor manufacturing and mechanical pursuits, the average earn- ings are $319, whereas in New Mexico, which has the mini- mum per cent of foreign-born breadwinners (3.9), the average earnings are $255. The lowest average earnings, $211 annually, are found in Delaware, with 6.7 per cent of foreign-born women employed in manufactures, while in Massachusetts, with six times as many foreign-born, the average annual earnings were 52 per cent above the Dela- ware average. The preponderance of evidence, to use a legal term, supports the conclusion that, as a rule, the annual earnings are higher in States with a higher percentage of foreign-born factory workers. But making allowance for the few exceptions to this rule, the least that can be said is that there is no proof of a tendency of immigration, old or new, to depress the rate of wages. The preceding conclusions based upon an examination of census statistics of average earnings are corroborated by the results of Prof. Nearing's study of wage statistics published by State labor bureaus. He finds " that average wages are rather constant for a given industry from State to State, and from city to city within a State." 1 As the percentage of immigrants among the wage-earners employed in each in- dustry greatly varies from State to State and from city to city, it is evident that immigration does not affect the rate of wages. "The opportunities for the new hands depend upon the expansion of industry and the resources of the country," says Professor Commons. ' ' Provided this expansion occurs, there is no overcrowding of the labor market. The new resources and new investments demand new labor; and, if the expansion is strong enough, the new labor as well as the existing labor may secure advances in wages." * It is broadly asserted by Professors Jenks and Lauck that the large supply of Southern and^ Eastern European labor "has seriously retarded the advance of wages in those occu- 1 Nearing, loc. ciL, pp. 145-146. a Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 305. Effect of Immigration on Wages 303 pations where such labor could be used to advantage." The case of section hands on the railroads is cited as a spe- cific example: their wages are said to have "varied little during the last fifteen years, although the wages in other lines of industry have advanced materially." 1 This con- clusion is at variance with the statistics of the Interstate Commerce Commission, which furnish an accurate record of the yearly fluctuations of average daily wages for the main classes of railway employees. 2 In order to bring out the effect of the supply of Southern and Eastern European labor upon the wages of section hands on the railways, the varia- tions in their wages must be compared with the variations in the wages of other railway employees. It should not be lost sight of that the rates of wages are governed by de- mand, as well as by supply, not by supply alone. That wages in other lines of industry have advanced more rapidly, may have been due to a greater demand for labor in those lines. It is only when the comparison is confined to railway employees that the changes in the rates of wages can be ob- served under uniform conditions. The data for such a com- parison are presented in graphic form in Diagram XVIII. Of the eight classes shown on the diagram all but the lowest two consist of English-speaking employees, while the two lowest grades are filled very largely by immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. The engineers, conductors, and firemen have strong organizations, while the laborers and trackmen are unorganized. The raises secured by the latter have come solely through the operation of the law of supply and demand. The wage curves for all classes but general office clerks show a rising tendency; the variations from year to year are almost parallel. The office clerks are the only class whose wages have remained practically sta- 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 206-207. In a preceding paragraph this specific example is qualified by the statement that "in certain cases they [immigrants hired for railroad section work] have been paid even more than the laborers previously employed, the latter being insufficient in number to meet the increasing demand. " (p. 206). 2 Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1910, Table 169, p. 266. Immigration and Labor tionary; considering the increased cost of living, their real wages have in fact declined. The clerical force is, with few exceptions, either of native or of Northern and Western European birth. Thus while the wages of Southern and Eastern European section hands have been raised to meet DIAGRAM XVIII. *4 *Z- a I S I TXACfMCM n 8 Woolen goods 66 58 8 * Report of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in United Stofe$,vol.ix.. pp. 62-63, 66. Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor ; 1869-1870, pp. 9 1-92. J See Table 9 1 . Report of Woman and Child Wage-Earners, vol. ix., p. 63. 5 Figures computed from Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1872, pp. 119-217; Nineteenth Annual Report of the Com- missioner of Labor, Table V. 314 Immigration and Labor The factory workers of Massachusetts gained during the period of the new immigration an average reduction of 7.3 hours a week, or about an hour and a quarter per day. In the woolen mills the gain in time was even slightly above the average, although forty years ago the mill operatives were mostly Irish immigrants, whereas lately the mills have been run with a polyglot help made up of all the races of Southern and Eastern Europe and Asiatic Turkey (as has been brought to public attention by the recent strike at Law- rence) . The conditions in the textile mills of Massachusetts are certainly far from ideal; nevertheless fifty-eight hours a week are a great stride in advance since the period when the customary time was from sunrise to sunset, "as long as they could see. " And it cannot be "said that all improve- ments in conditions" of the textile workers "have been secured in spite of the presence of the recent immigrant," 1 because there was no one else to secure those improvements for them. Taking the United States as a whole, we find that since the beginning of the "new immigration" the hours of labor have been gradually reduced; "the decrease in the hours of labor in 1907, as compared with 1890, was 5.7 per cent." 2 This fact shows at least that the recent immigrant has not hindered the movement toward better conditions of employ- ment. It would require some proof to sustain the contention of the Immigration Commission that "his availability and his general characteristics and attitude have constituted a passive opposition which has been most effective." 3 The Commission has made no investigation on the sub- ject of hours of labor, except in a casual way. There is a table giving the hours of work in one unnamed steel concern. It appears that in the blast furnace department all hands, skilled and unskilled alike, work twelve hours. In all other departments the unskilled laborers work ten hours, whereas 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I , p. 541 2 Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 77, p. 4. Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, p. 541. Hours of Labor 315 the hours of the skilled and semi-skilled employees vary as follows: in 7 occupations, 8 hours; in 143 occupations, 10 hours; in 269 occupations, 12 hours. In the coal mines operated by the same concern, the laborers work 10 hours, whereas the skilled and semi-skilled employees in 34 out of 42 occupations work 12 hours, and only in 8 occupations 10 hours. 1 The unskilled laborers in the mines and mills are mostly recent immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, whereas the skilled and semi-skilled positions are filled almost exclusively by native Americans and old Eng- lish-speaking immigrants. The Immigration Commission itself says that "the immigrant does not appear . . . at the present time to be even competing with him [the American] in any serious way for the better-paid positions." 2 It is evident that the longer hours of the English-speaking em- ployees are not the result of recent immigration, since the recent immigrants themselves work shorter hours. The report on the cotton industry shows that in 1845 the working day in the cotton mills averaged 12 hours and 10 minutes; the shortest days were in December and January, averaging 1 1 hours and 24 minutes, and the long- est in April were as high as 13 hours and 31 minutes. At the time the report was written, the working hours were 56 per week, i. e., 10 hours per day with a half holiday on Satur- day. 3 Thus sixty years of immigration have been attended by a reduction of 2 hours and 50 minutes in the length of the working day in the cotton mills. The most complete statistics of hours of labor are con- tained in the reports of the factory inspectors of the State of New York, covering an average of nearly a million factory employees annually , f or 1 90 1 - 1 9 1 o . New York is affected by immigration more than any other State in the Union. The period under consideration has witnessed the greatest volume of immigration known in the history of the United 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, Table 281, pp. 377- 381. a Ibid., vol. 8, p. 583. J Ibid., vol. n, pp. 273 and 290. 3i6 Immigration and Labor > States, and the bulk of that immigration has been from the countries of Southern and Eastern Europe. The reports on factory inspection in the State of New York, therefore, offer the results of observation, under conditions best calculated to bring out the effects of immigration. Moreover, the figures for the city of New York can be compared with those for the rest of the State. In the city of New York the foreign-born population furnished in 1900, 50.7 per cent of all persons engaged in manufactures and mechanical pur- suits, while in the State outside of New York the ratio was only 22.9 per cent. The natives of Southern and Eastern Europe constituted in the same year 16.1 per cent of the total population of New York City, and 2.1 per cent of the total population of the State outside of New York City. By 1910 their proportion in New York City increased to 24.1 per cent and in the remainder of the State to 6.6 per cent. 1 The per cent distribution of factory operatives by the number of hours of work in and outside of New York City is given in Table 92 on the next page. The figures show: (1) That the decade of the heaviest immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was marked by a gradual reduction of the hours of labor in the State of New York; (2) That the percentage of factory operatives working ten hours or less on week days with a half -holiday on Satur- day was much greater in New York City with its large colonies of alien workers than in the remainder of the State with a working population predominantly native; (3) That after a decade of "undesirable immigration" more than two thirds of all factory workers in New York City work ten hours or less on week days with a half holi- day on Saturday, whereas in the remainder of the State the majority still work longer hours. The preconceived notions about the "general character- 1 XIII. Census. Population, vol. i, pp. 79, 148, 825-827, 832 (com- puted). Hours of Labor 3*7 istics" of the recent immigrant do not stand the scrutiny of incontrovertible statistical figures. TABLE 92. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORY OPERATIVES BY WEEKLY HOURS OF LABOR IN NEW YORK CITY AND IN NEW YORK STATE OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK CITY, New York City New York State outside of New York City Year 57 hours or 58 hours and 57 hours or 58 hours and less over less over I9OI 53-7 46-3 I 7 .8 82.2 1902 54-8 45-2 22.2 77-8 1903 65.8 34-2 25.2 74-8 1904 1905 67.4 68.8 32.6 31-2 31-8 34-5 68.2 65-5 1906 69.0 31-0 35-0 65.0 1907 71.2 28.8 38.5 61.5 1908 70.9 29.1 40.9 59-1 1909 71.5 28.5 39-5 60.5 I9IO 75-5 24-5 40.4 59-6 1 Annual Report of the New York Bureau of Labor, vol. ii., 1910, Table 31, p. xlvi. CHAPTER XIV CHILD LABOR labor has a depressing effect upon the rate of wages. Thousands of children of immigrants are employed in the mills of New England and the Middle Atlantic States. The inference which readily suggests itself to the popular mind is that child labor is the product of immigration. It is a historical fact, however, that child labor originated in the United States with the introduction of the factory system during the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Early writers on economic subjects favored the employment of children in factories, because it would save adult male labor for agriculture, fishing, shipping, and the skilled trades. Child labor was advocated on religious and philanthropic grounds. The various immigrant races which succeeded one another in the nineteenth century found child labor as an integral part of the factory system in the United States. 1 During the ten-year period from 1899 to 1909, with its unprecedented immigration, the average number of children employed in factories remained stationary, viz., in 1899- 161,276, in 1909162,493, while the relative number de- creased from 3.4 per cent to 2.4 per cent of all wage-earners. 2 1 Carlton, loc. cit., pp. 380-385. 1 XIII. Census, vol. viii. Manufactures, p. 253. It is probable that the number of children at work has decreased as well. The number of wage-earners for 1899, owing to the method of computation followed at the XII. Census, was considerably underestimated: The average number was computed "by using 12, the-number of calendar months, as a divisor into the total of the average numbers reported for each month." The effect of this method is shown in the case of twelve 318 Child Labor The most significant fact to be noted concerning the rela- tion between child labor and immigration is the large pro- portion of children employed in factories in States where there is practically no immigrant population. Children of native-born American parents are drawn into the mills as a substitute for immigrant labor. This conclusion is derived from Table 93, showing the dependence of factories upon child labor in six leading manufacturing States, according to the recent census. TABLE 93. PER CENT OF CHILDREN UNDER 1 6 EMPLOYED IN FACTORIES, IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN SIX LEADING MANUFACTURING STATES, 1909, AND PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN, I9IO. 1 State Per cent of children to all wage-earners Per cent of foreign- born to total population United States 2.4 14.7 South Carolina I2.Q O 4. North Carolina II .1 o.^ IVtassachtisetts I C IJ C Pennsylvania *.* 18.8 Illinois I c 21 4. New York 0.8 ^O.2 In the four leading manufacturing States of the North with a large immigrant population, child labor holds a sub- ordinate place in the industrial organization, while in North and South Carolina one in every eight or nine factory operatives is under the age of 16. The lowest per cent of child workers is in New York, which is overrun by immi- grants, old and new. selected industries, where the average number computed "as an abstract unit (like the foot-pound) " was 475,473, whereas the total "computed on the basis of time in operation would have exceeded 650,000, " the variation being as high as 36 per cent. XII. Census. Manufactures, Part I., pp. cvi., ex., and cxi. 1 XIII. Census, vol. viii.: Manufactures, pp. 270-271; vol. i: Popu- lation, pp. 161-162. 320 Immigration and Labor The latest available statistics of the distribution of chil- dren employed in manufactures by nativity relate to the year 1900. The figures are given in Table 94. TABLE 94. DISTRIBUTION, BY PARENT NATIVITY AND COLOR, OF THE NUMBER OP CHILDREN OF BOTH SEXES, IO TO 15 YEARS OF AGE, ENGAGED IN MANUFACTURES AND MECHANICAL PURSUITS, BY GEOGRAPHICAL DIVISIONS, Race and Nativity Con- tinental United States North Atlantic Division North Central Division Western Division South Atlantic Division South Central Division Number: White: Native parents II4,88l 46,534 19.155 1,696 35,292 I2,2O4 Foreign parents 159.679 104,574 44.796 3,199 4,172 3,038 Colored 9.7OQ AQT. 670 288 A 78/1 306 s ? Total 283,860 151,601 64.,6'U) 5,081 44,248 18,107 Per cent: White: Native parents Foreign parents Colored 40.5 56-3 5.2 30.7 69.0 O.^ 29.6 69-3 I.I 62.9 c 7 79.8 9-4 10 8 66.7 16.6 16 7 Total IOO.O IOO O IOO.O IOO O IOO O IOO In the country at large, the percentage ratio of children of each nativity employed in manufactures corresponded to the percentage of all breadwinners of the same nativity, engaged in manufacturing and mechanical pursuits. 2 In other words, on the whole the foreign-born sent to the factories no more than their quota of children. There is a marked difference, however, in the ratio of children of native parents for each section of the country: in the South the 1 Occupations, XII. Census, Table LVIIL, p. clix. "The per cent distribution, by parent nativity and color, of persons of all ages engaged in manufactures in the United States was as follows: white of native parentage, 39.8 per cent; white of foreign parentage, 56.0 per cent; colored, 4.2 per cent. Ibid., Table XXXVI., p. cxiii. Child Labor 321 overwhelming majority of factory workers under 16 years of age are children of native parents. Another important fact is the age distribution of children employed in factories. The Immigration Commission in its study of households of cotton-mill operatives in the North Atlantic States found but one child under 14 years of age at work in a total of 795 children between 6 and 13 years, and that a French-Canadian. * There are as yet no comparable data more recent than the census figures for 1900. The latter are presented in Table 95. TABLE 95. COTTON-MILL OPERATIVES UNDER 14 YEARS OP AGE IN THE PRINCIPAL MANUFACTURING STATES, IQOO. 8 State Number New England: Maine 602 New Hampshire 527 Massachusetts 199 Connecticut 50 Rhode Island 615 Middle Atlantic: \ New York 51 New Jersey 1 16 Pennsylvania 311 Southern: j North Carolina 5515 South Carolina 103 Georgia 2637 Alabama 1608 While, as has been shown above, the absolute number of children employed in factories is greater in the North than in the South, the children under 14 in the cotton mills of the South far outnumber those of the same age in the great manufacturing States of the North. This is, no doubt, due to the child-labor laws of the Northern States. No one in the Northern States to-day defends the employ- ment of children under 14 in factories. In the Southern States, however, the economic needs of the growing manu- facturing industries have produced eloquent advocates of 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, Table 46, p. 419. a Occupations at the XII. Census, Table LXV., pp. ckix.-clxxxv. 322 Immigration and Labor child labor in positions of influence. x Foreign-born wage- earners are a negligible factor in the Southern labor market. The growth of manufacturing industries in the South is restricted by the natural increase of the native population. In order to extend their operations, the manufacturers of the South must resort to the employment of children, as did their predecessors in New England a century ago before immigration came to supply the needs of American industry. This situation is by no means confined to the South. Absence of foreign immigration has created a demand for the labor of native American children in the canneries and shoe factories of rural and semi-urban Missouri. The rural districts of Missouri lost, from 1900 to 1910, 3 . 5 per cent of their population. The total population of the State increased only 6 per cent. The foreign-born in 1910, as well as in 1900, constituted 7 per cent of the total population of the State at large, and only ? 3.3 per cent of the State outside of St. Louis and Kansas City. The additions to the foreign-born population through immigration since the census of 1900 averaged only 1310 persons annually, but the increase was concentrated in St. Louis and Kansas City, whereas the remainder of the State lost in ten years 8380 of its foreign-born population. 2 The statistics of the State Labor Bureau show an increase of the number of working children in the smaller cities, the towns and rural sections, "which can be traced to the large number of shoe factories and canneries which sprang up, outside of St. Louis, Kansas City, and St. Joseph, during 1908." The foreign- born labor supply in those sections is negligible. The Commissioner of Labor offers the following explanation for the increase in the employment of children: 1 "The cotton mills are set forth ... as the savior of the people, re- ligiously, educationally, and, according to Dr. Stiles, physically." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , Supplement, March, 1910. A. J. McKelwayrThe Mill or the Farm, p. 54. 2 XIII. Census. Population, vol. i., pp. 27, 61, 135, 149, 178 (com- puted). Child Labor 323 The increase in working women and children in 1908 over 1907, shown by these statistics, does not mean that conditions are such that those who ought to remain at home and take care of domestic affairs must go out into the world and toil, but in reality is due to an increase in the number of establishments in which the light, delicate touch of a gentle hand is needed, instead of strength, endurance, and mechanical labor. . . . It is necessary to state here that while the canning industry of Missouri is still in its infancy, the year 1908 was probably the best the State has ever had in this line, and that is why more employees were needed. . . . The increase in child labor was not due to the stringency, the increased cost of living, or to the poorer condition of the masses, but, instead, to an increased demand for these workers from the new canneries and shoe factories. Both these lines have a class of very light work, suitable only for boys and girls, which does not pay enough weekly for older persons. This assertion is not made in defence of child labor, but merely to explain why it exists in canneries and shoe factories. x The explanation sounds very similar to that offered in the Southern States. 2 It accounts, as far as it goes, for the em- ployment of children in canneries: an agricultural com- munity is the natural location for the canning industry, outside labor is scarce in rural districts and the canning season is short. No local advantage for the shoe factories, however, exists in rural Missouri. The centre of the shoe manufacturing industry is Massachusetts, which in 1905 contributed 45 per cent of the total output of the United States. 3 The seat of the shoe-manufacturing industry of Missouri is St. Louis, whose output increased from 74 per cent of the total for the State in 1899 to 81 per cent in 1904. 4 1 Reports of the Missouri Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1909, pp. 320-321. 3 " The cotton mills were the most powerful opponents [of theLouisiana child-labor law], ably seconded by the canning industries. To hear the representatives of both these industries, one, not knowing any better, would have been convinced that the most healthful, remunerative, edu- cational place in the entire world in which to develop children was in a cotton mill or an oyster cannery. One fairly tingled to spend the rest of life shucking oysters or peeling shrimp." Supplement, Annals of the Am. Acad. of Political and Social Science, March, 1909. Jean M. Gordon: The Forward Step in Louisiana, p. 163. 3 Census Report, Manufactures. 1905, Part I., p. ccxxx. Ibid., pp. ccxxx. and ccxxxi. (computed). 324 Immigration and Labor The principal inducement for locating new shoe factories in rural sections of Missouri appears to be the availability of cheap labor of native American women and children, who can underbid the male immigrants employed in the shoe factories of Massachusetts. " CHAPTER XV LABOR ORGANIZATIONS Immigration Commission has made the statement 1 that " the recent immigrant has not, as a rule, affiliated himself with labor unions, unless compelled to do so as a preliminary step toward acquiring work. . . . Where he has united with the labor organizations he has usually refused to maintain his membership for any extended period of time, thus rendering difficult the unionizing of the occu- pation or industry in which he has been engaged.'* This assertion could be proved only by a statistical study of the membership of labor organizations. It is a characteristic fact that with a Federal Bureau of Labor and a number of State labor bureaus we have no compilation of the total number of organized workers in the United States for a series of years. x A great deal of information on the subject is scattered in the published reports of labor conventions. The inevitable gaps could be supplied from the records of labor organizations. The Immigration Commission, how- ever, made no effort to secure statistics of union member- ship in a systematic way from official sources, but confined its inquiries in the main to the heads of the households covered by its investigation. The report of the Commission contains data concerning 3325 trade unionists, whereas the total membership of labor organizations in the United States was estimated for 1910 at 2,625,000. * The reports of the Commission contain a few fragmentary data on the member- ship of labor organizations, apparently obtained from their 1 Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xvii., p. xviii. *New York Labor Bulletin, September, 1911, p. 418. 325 326 Immigration and Labor officials, but these data flatly contradict the conclusions of the Commission. We learn that "practically 36 per cent of the total number of clothing workers in New York are organized; while 80 per cent of the cutters are members of the cutters' union. Of the organized workers, about 60 per cent are Russian and Polish Hebrews, 30 per cent Italians, and 10 per cent persons of other races including foreign and native-born." 1 To understand the meaning of these percentages, we must compare them with the percentage of organized workers in all industries. The total number of male industrial wage- earners in the United States at the census of 1900 can be estimated at 8,600,000 2 ; since very few women are affiliated with labor organizations the number of males alone need be taken into consideration in computing the percentage of organized workers. The increase of the population of the United States from 1 900 to 1 9 1 o was 2 1 per cent. The num- ber of male industrial wage-earners in 1910 can accordingly be estimated at 10,400,000, and the proportion of organized workingmen in all industries at 25 per cent. Thus while, on an average, only 25 per cent of all male wage-eairners in the United States were affiliated with labor organizations, among the clothing workers in New York City 36 per cent were organized, all but one tenth of the organized workers being Russian and Polish Hebrews and Italians. Of the most skilled among them, the cutters, 80 per cent were mem- bers of their union, i.e., relatively thrice as many as in all industries of the country at large. Of course, the question is whether the condition in the clothing industry of New York may be accepted as typical. The reports of the Immigration Commission furnish no comparable data for the industries of the country at large. The results of the study of households comprise less than two trade-unionists in every 1000. Still, this being the only 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission? vol. II, p. 388. 2 1. A. Hourwich, " Social -Economic Classes of the Population of the United States," Journal of Political Economy, March, 1911, p. 205. Labor Organizations 327 statistical evidence which the Immigration Commission has produced in support of its conclusions regarding the attitude of recent immigrants toward trade unions, it is worthy of note that upon the Commission's own showing trade- unionism is as strong among the immigrants as among the native American workmen. The ratio of organized workers to all male wage-earners in each population group is shown in Table 96. TABLE 96. ORGANIZATION OF NATIVE AND IMMIGRANT LABOR. 1 _ Nativity of wage-earners Native-born of native father: White ............................................ 13 .9 Negro ............................................ 17.9 Native-born of foreign father ....................... . . 14.1 Foreign-born ........................................ 13 .4 While on the whole trade-unionism is very weak in the field covered by the investigation of the Commission, it is manifest from the practical uniformity of the percentages for each group that distinctions of birth, race, and color do not explain this weakness. Neither could a line be drawn in respect of unionism be- tween the " desirable " immigrants from Northern and West- ern Europe and the "undesirable aliens from Southern and Eastern Europe. " This fact is brought to light by the com- parison in Table 97 of the principal immigrant races that are represented by at least 500 persons each 2 in the statistics of the Immigration Commission. On the whole, the aver- age percentage of union men among the "undesirable aliens" is higher than among the immigrants of the preferred races. 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, p. 417. a Smaller groups have been omitted because, where the numbers are small, the ratios are liable to be influenced by exceptional circumstances and local conditions; for example, the highest percentage of organized workmen, 100 per cent, was found among the Mexicans, because the investigators of the Commission chanced to come across 56 Mexican miners in a unionized mine. Ibid., pp. 418-419. 328 Immigration and Labor TABLE 97- ORGANIZATION OF IMMIGRANT LABOR 1 'Desirable" races Total number Organized Number Per cent 573 524 724 515 537 I,IOI 133 87 107 48 26 51 23.2 16.6 14.8 9-3 4-8 4.6 Irish Swedish German Total 3.974 452 II.4 "Undesirable" races North Italian 881 1,408 761 684 1,706 2,428 1,501 3,280 351 497 163 144 234 258 146 313 39-8 35-3 21.4 21. 1 13.7 10.5 9-7 9-5 Hebrew Ruthenian Slovak South Italian Magyar polish Total 12,649 2,106 16.6 The percentage of trade-unionists among North Italians is nearly three times as high as among native Americans of native parentage; the Lithuanians furnish twice as many as the more desirable Englishmen; the Hebrews twice as many as the Swedes; the Ruthenians are far ahead of the Americans of native stock; even the South Italians can boast a percentage twice as high as the Germans; the Mag- yars and the Slovaks march in front of the Swedes; and the Poles, who are at the tail end of the procession of undesirables from Eastern Europe, still outnumber two to one their more 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, p. 418. Labor Organizations 329 favored kinsmen, the Bohemians and Moravians. Con- sidering that the native Americans and the members of the races which contributed most largely to the earlier immi- gration are, as a rule, engaged in higher occupations, where they are for the most part segregated from the recent immi- grants, it is clear that the latter could not be an obstacle in the way of organization among the skilled men ; and that they have not been an obstacle is shown by the fact that the re- cent immigrants themselves furnish a higher percentage of organized workmen. As usual, when the facts do not fit its theory, the Com- mission seeks to qualify the plain language of the figures: These figures must not, however, be taken as representative of racial tendencies except in a few cases, for the reason that the information shown for one race may be for but one or two industries in which the race is employed and which are so controlled by labor organizations that membership in the labor unions is necessary to secure employment. On the other hand, a race or several races may be employed in an indus- try or industries in which no labor unions exist. . . . The fact that certain races are most extensively employed in highly unionized localities and industries is indicative of comparatively greater assimilation and progressiveness on the part of the members of such races. 1 The Commission thus assumes that affiliation of immi- grants with labor organizations is a sign of their "assimi- lation, " which implies that organization of labor is a native growth, and that the foreigner merely imitates the ways of the native. This view has no foundation in the history of organized labor in the United States. The fact is that the membership of most of the labor organizations has from their inception been very largely foreign-born. Historians have traced the embryo of labor organization in America to the colonial period. Labor organizations sprang up here and there during the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Between 1825 and 1850 a number of labor conventions were held. But all labor organizations 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 419. 330 Immigration and Labor before the Civil War were ephemeral and soon disintegrated. Their effect upon economic conditions was negligible. x The depreciation of the currency and the consequent rise of the cost of living during the Civil War stimulated organization among workmen. Still the figures made acces- sible by the research of Dr. Fite "plainly caution the present generation against exaggerating the importance of the war-time unions; they were numerous and bold in leadership, but they were small in membership and em- braced only a small part of the labor world. " 2 The plan of the X. Census comprised an inquiry into the subject of trade unions in the United States. The statisti- cal data collected were fragmentary. The development of labor organizations up to 1880 is summed up as follows: "But very few of the unions reported upon, so far as their age could be learned, have had a long existence. The his- tory of unionism in most cases is that an organization is effected under the stress of some difficulty, flourishes for a while, and then dies out, to be brought to life again in case of urgent need." 3 Five years later, Col. Richard J. Hinton, a strong labor sympathizer, contrasting the British with the American labor organizations, noted with regret that "in the United States the whole movement has hardly reached the stage of toleration." 4 Official inquiries made about the same time in Illinois (1886) and New Jersey (1887) established the fact that the majority of the trade-unionists and Knights of Labor were 1 Mass. Report on Statistics of Labor, 1906, "The Incorporation of Trade Unions," Part. III., pp. 131-134. Frank Tracy Carlton. The History and Problems of Organized Labor, p. 41. Emerson David Fite: Social and Industrial Conditions during the Civil War, pp. 204-205. * X. 'Census, vol. xx. Report on Trade Societies in the United States, p. 3. Richard J. Hinton, "American Labor Organizations," The North American Review, January, 1885, p. 49. ~An official report for the same year states that "trade unions in America are in their infancy yet." Ninth Annual Report of the Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics (1885, p. 20). Labor Organizations 331 of foreign birth, whereas the native Americans contributed less than their quota to the membership of labor organiza- tions. 1 This fact had been generally known before from common ^observation. In the report of the New Jersey Bureau of Statistics of Labor for 1884, immigration was held directly responsible for the organization of labor unions. The writer of an article on "Immigration and the Labor Problem, " after stating that native Americans are displaced by laborers "coming from countries in which wages are lower than our standard" and where the standard of living is therefore lower, goes on to say that to the American laborer of twenty-five or thirty years since, such an occurrence would have been an inconvenience but not altogether a dis- aster. Failing to obtain the work he wanted at one place or in one trade, he would turn to another and yet another, until he had found something by which he could live. But the foreign-born operative has but little of this cat-like facility of falling upon his feet. He knows but a single trade; often, in the subdivision of mechanical employments, which is almost uniformily prevalent and becoming still more so, only a small fraction of that. Thrown out of his place, he must find another almost precisely similar, or acquire a new training by a slow and painful process, during which he earns little or nothing, and he has in far the greater number of cases nothing laid up. That men should grow desperate and wicked under such circumstances is not surprising. That they should combine in leagues of various kinds; limit the hours of labor, or the amount of work to be done in a given time; refuse to work with appren- tices, or men outside of their own associations; strike, and agree not only to remain idle themselves, but to prevent others from working; . . . is the most natural thing in the world. 2 Thus, as late as 1884, the organization of labor unions was decried in a State report as un-American, the work of foreign- ers grown "desperate and wicked." Ten years later the Minnesota Bureau of Labor undertook an investigation to disprove that view. It is instructive to contrast the state of public opinion in the early go's as reflected in the report x The results of those inquiries are given in the Appendix, Table XXII. Seventh A nnual Report of the New Jersey Bureau of Statistics of Labor and Industries (1884), pp. 289-290. 332 Immigration and Labor of the Minnesota Labor Bureau, with the sentiment of our own day, when a Congressional commission regards unionism as a manifestation of Americanism : It has been repeatedly charged by a certain class of writers that American trade unions are conspiracies to prevent American boys from acquiring skilled crafts. This charge has been most clearly stated by the Century Magazine, May, 1893. It says: "Under the present con- ditions of trade instruction and employment in this country the Ameri- can boy has no rights which organized labor is bound to respect. He is denied instruction as an apprentice, and if he be taught his trade in a trade school he is refused admission to nearly all trade unions and is boy- cotted if he attempts to work as a non-union man. The questions of his character and skill enter into the matter only to discriminate against him. All the trade unions of the country are controlled by foreigners, who comprise the great body of their members; while they refuse ad- mission to the trained American boy, they admit all foreign applicants with little or no regard to their training or skill. In fact the doors of organized labor in America, which are closed and barred against Ameri- can boys, swing open wide and free to all foreign-comers. Labor in free America is free to all save sons of Americans. " The same magazine, in its issue of July , 1 893 , says : ' ' They (the trade unions) are afraid of America 's independent ideas in their unions, knowing, as they do, that American workmen are not so servile and not so easily led as the more ignorant foreign workmen. " a The report of the Minnesota Bureau of Labor then pro- ceeds to disprove, by figures relative to Minnesota labor unions, the statements made in the Century articles. It shows that in the three large cities of the State 62 per cent of males of voting age at the census of 1890 were foreign- born, whereas of the total number of trade unionists who replied to the inquiries of the Bureau, 58.54 per cent were 1 Fourth Biennial Report of the Minnesota Bureau of Labor (1893-94), P- 175- 3 The author of a doctor's dissertation, submitted to the University of Chicago at the same time, strongly advocated restriction of immi- gration, to ward off a "peril" which threatened American labor in "the fact that our trade unions are almost exclusively controlled by foreigners . . . incapable by long oppression in the industrial slavery of Europe to understand or appreciate the true dignity or interests of American labor. " Rena M. Atchison : Un-A merican Immigration, p. 1 05. Labor Organizations 333 born in the United States and 41.46 per cent were foreign- born. But a table in the report shows 1 1 of the unions with more than 62 per cent of foreign-born members. Those trades were the granite cutters with 70.09, bricklayers with 72.10, tailors with 100, bakers with loo, carpenters with 75-75 stonecutters with 72.75, blacksmiths with 100 per cent of foreign-born members. The change of public sentiment from 1894, when the "ignorant foreign workmen" were accused of organizing labor unions, to 1910, when the ignorant foreigners were accused of keeping away from labor unions, is symptomatic of the progress of organized labor during the intervening period. In 1894, when the "ignorant foreigners" com- prised mainly the races of "the old immigration," trade unionism was still weak; after eighteen years of "undesir- able immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe," organized labor has gained in numbers and won public recognition. An idea of the comparative strength of labor organizations in the days of the old and the new immigration can be gained from the distribution of the number of existing unions by the period of their organizations, as shown in Table 98. Very few of the existing unions were organized prior to 1880. The work of organization has since been proceeding at an increasing rate of speed. During the first decade of the new immigration, 1880-1890, more unions were organ- ized and survived than throughout the whole previous his- tory of the United States. In the next decade, 1890-1900, when immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe first outran "the old immigration," the number of new unions organized in five of the six States (all but Illinois) exceeded the total number of unions which had survived from pre- vious times. But the greatest success rewarded the efforts of union organizers during the first decade of the present century. In Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Minnesota more new unions were organized since 1900 than during the whole ninteenth century. It must be borne in mind that 334 Immigration and Labor Massachusetts and Connecticut have received large ac- cessions to their population from Southern and Eastern Europe. Thus the greatest activity in the field of organiza- tion coincided with the unparalleled new immigration of the past decade. TABLE 98. NUMBER AND DATE OF ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVE LABOR UNIONS IN SIX INDUSTRIAL STATES. 1 1 1 5 Period g t> at "jj 2 1 B 6 1 | 1 a ii Total number: Prior to 1880. . . 32 24 40 65 40 ii 1880-1889 116 6i 126 254 75 62 1800-1800. . . 107 1 08 7IO 278 24.1 107 Since 1900 6583 24.1 107 s Annual average: 1880-1889 12 6 1 1 2 r 8 6 1800-1800. . . 2O ii 71 28 24. Since 1900 71 28 QI 6 22 The aggregate membership of labor organizations in the United States and Canada was estimated by the Industrial Commission at 1,300,000 for July i, I9OI. 7 The aggregate 'Compiled from Report on Statistics of Labor, Massachusetts, 1908, pp. 185-186. Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics, 24th Annual Report, 1900, p. 297. Minnesota Labor Report, 1905-6, p. 365; ibid., 1907-8, p. 83. Report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of Illinois, 1886, p. 198; ibid., 1901, p. 298. Report of the Connecticut Bureau of Labor Sta- tistics, 1909-1910, p. 217. J2d Annual Report of the Missouri Bureau of Labor. a Periods: Up to 1880; 1881-1890; 1891-1900; 1901-1908. * 1900-1908. < 1900-1909. s 1900-1908. 6 In 1900-1901 183. 7 The total membership of enumerated unions was estimated at 1,208,000, to which was added an arbitrary allowance of 191,100 for the Knights of Labor "and unenumerated organizations. " The former were at the time in a moribund condition, and the Industrial Commission believed that its estimate was subject to a probable error of 100,000. Reports of the Industrial Commission, vol. xvii., p. xix. Labor Organizations 335 membership of all unions in 1910 was estimated by the New York Bureau of Labor at 2,625,000 for the United States and Canada. 1 Thus in nine years from 1901 to 1910, with their unprecedented immigration, the membership of la- bor organizations doubled, whereas the average number of wage-earners employed in manufactures increased from 1899 to 1909 only about 40 per cent, 2 the number of railway employees from 1900 to 1910, 67 per cent, 3 etc. The reports of the New York Bureau of Labor Statistics since 1897 furnish a record of the annual increase or decrease of union membership, which permits of a comparative study of the relation between trade-unionism and immigration. New York State is the receptacle of more than its propor- tionate share of "the new immigration." New York City is a temporary stopping-place for many a stranded immi- grant lacking the funds for continuing his journey to final destination. The evil effects of immigration, if such they be, must appear in aggravated form in the State of New York. The relation between union membership and immi- gration is shown graphically in Diagram XX. 4 The curves representing trade-union membership and the immigration of breadwinners 5 run almost parallel, showing that union 1 New York Labor Bulletin, Sept., 1911, p. 418. 2 XIII. Census, volume viii. Manufactures, p. 240. The real increase of the average number of wage-earners is smaller, because the number for 1910 is the average of 12 monthly pay-rolls, whereas in 1900 the average number was computed "by using 12, the number of calendar months, as a divisor into the total of the average numbers reported for each month. " The effect of this change of method is shown in the case of twelve selected industries, where the average number computed "as an abstract unit (like the foot-pound)" was 475,473, whereas the total "computed on the basis of time in operation would have exceeded 650,000, " the variation being as high as 36 per cent. XII. Census. Manufactures, Part I., pp. cvi., ex., cxi. * Interstate Commerce Commission. Twenty-third Annual Report tf the Statistics of Railways, pp. 33-34. The figures from which the latter is plotted will be found in the Appendix, Table XXIII. A11 immigrants save those that have "no occupation (including women and children)," in official terminology. 336 Immigration and Labor membership rises and falls as immigration rises and falls. The New York statistics thus disprove the conclusion of the DIAGRAM XX. r~ b ^ a \_ /: XX. Labor union membership in the State of New York, number of immigrant bread-winners destined for the State of New York and combined imports and exports through the port of New York. 1897-1910. Immigration Commission that "liis (the recent immigrant's) availability and his general characteristics and attitude have constituted a passive opposition which has been most Labor Organizations 337 effective." 1 The third curve represents the aggregate ex- ports and imports through the port of New York. The import and export trade of New York gives employment, directly and indirectly, to a large portion of the population of the city. It feeds the traffic of all railways in the State with terminals in New York. The fluctuations of the export trade may therefore be taken as an index of the business situation in the State of New York. It will be observed that the curve of union membership follows very closely the curve of foreign trade. The fluctuations of union member- ship accordingly depend upon the business situation. The latter likewise determines the fluctuations of immigration. The harmonious movement of immigration and organiza- tion among workers is thus accounted for by the fact that both are stimulated by business prosperity and discouraged by business depression. The question may be raised, however: given the indus- trial expansion of the past decade, would not the progress of trade-unionism have been greater "without the availability of the recent immigrant labor supply"? An answer to this question is furnished by the comparative statistics of union membership in the States of New York and Kansas for 1900- 1909. While New York has received great numbers of immigrants during this period, the ratio of foreign-born in Kansas has been steadily decreasing since 1880: in the latter year the ratio was n per cent, in 1910 only 8 per cent. The proportion of foreign-born from Southern and Eastern Europe to the population of Kansas was only 2 per cent. 2 At the same time Kansas has shared in the indus- trial expansion of the period, as witnessed by the amounts paid out in wages to factory operatives in 1899 an( ^ i99 shown in Table 99. While the increase in the United States at large amounted to 71 per cent and in New York City to 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i., p. 541. 2 Statistical Abstract, 1910, Table 25, p. 53. XIII. Census. Popula- tion, vol. i., p. 817; vol. ii., p. 669. 338 Immigration and Labor 65 per cent, in Kansas it reached 100 per cent. The comparative growth of trade-unionism in New York and Kansas in 1900-1909 must accordingly reveal the effects of TABLE 99. TOTAL WAGES PAID TO FACTORY OPERATIVES IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN THE STATES OF NEW YORK AND KANSAS (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS), 1899 AND 1909. x 1899 1909 Per cent of increase United States 2008 ^427 71 New York . 7 Gey 6& Kansas I* 26 100 industrial expansion upon the progress of organization among the wage-earners, with and without the availability of the recent immigrant. Table 100 shows the ratio of organized workers in each of the two States to its total urban population. 2 The relative number of organized workmen is higher in New York with a large and growing immigrant population drawn from Southern and Eastern Europe than in Kansas with a small and decreasing foreign-born population. Prior to the recent crisis the percentage of organized workmen in New York was more than twice as high as in Kansas. The industrial depression of 1909 reduced the percentage of organized workmen in New York, while in Kansas the year 1908 was a record year for labor organiz- ations. Yet even then the proportion of organized work- men in New York remained higher than in Kansas. 1 XIII. Census, vol. viii. Manufactures, Table III, pp. 542, 543. * Urban population is defined by the census as "that residing in cities and other incorporated places of 2500 inhabitants or more." (XIII. Census, vol. i. Population, p. 53.) The population for 1900 is that enumerated by the census. The urban population for each subsequent year is estimated in accordance with the method followed by the United Labor Organizations 339 TABLE loo. PER CENT RATIO OF TRADE-UNION MEMBERSHIP TO URBAN POPULATION IN NSW YORE AND KANSAS, 1900-1909.* Year New York Kansas 1900 4.6 1-9 1901 5-0 2-3 1902 5-8 2.1 1903 6-7 2.6 1904 6.4 3<> 1905 6.1 3<> 1906 6.2 2.8 1907 6.6 2.9 1908 5-5 5-2 1909 5-3 4.4 The preceding ratios may be affected by the character of the urban population in the two States : if the proportion of wage-earners to the whole population in New York was higher than in Kansas, the difference might in a measure account for the higher percentage of organized workmen. These doubts are resolved by Diagram XXI., which shows for each State the ratio of union membership to the num- ber of industrial wage-earners at the XII. Census. 2 The curve for New York runs throughout the whole period above that for Kansas. These differences are by no means accidental. In the early period of trade-unionism in the United States, when it was generally regarded as a "foreign" plant and denounced as "un-American," contemporary observers sought to ex- plain the aloofness of the native American wage-earners from labor organizations by their "indisposition to identify themselves permanently with any class." The foreign workman has the tradition of many generations and the walls of caste to restrain him within certain limits as to his occupation; States Bureau of Statistics, by adding to the population of the preceding year one tenth of the increase from 1900 to 1910. * See Appendix, Table XXIV. a Ibid. DIAGRAM XXI. - s \ s XXI. Male union membership in the states of New York and Kansas, 1900-1909; Per cent ratio to the number of in- dustrial wage-earners in 1900. 340 Labor Organizations 341 he has no possibilities beyond a given sphere, and is trained and de- veloped within it. Thus environed, his career and ambitions lie in the paths his fathers have trod, and his associations with his fellow craftsmen make the trade union his natural and necessary place. Transported to this country he brings his feelings for the union and his class associa- tions with him as a habit. But the American mechanic's boy is born to no conditions in life from which he may not rise, of hope to rise, or which at least he may not abandon for better or worse. All the pre- cepts of the schools and teachings of observation suggest other ways of making a living, or at least other avenues in life, than those of his father.* In a later publication of the Massachusetts Labor Bureau the unstable character of trade unions in New England up to 1880 is explained by the fact "that early New England workmen seldom regarded their condition as journeymen as likely to be permanent. They nearly all looked forward with some degree of hope to a time when they would become employers."* This condition still exists in smaller communities where many of the native American wage-earners are home-own- ers, 3 and in country districts where the factory workers are drawn from the farms of the neighborhood. As a result, we find labor better organized in New York City with a high percentage of recent immigrants than in the remainder of the State of New York, with a predominantly native population. In Table 101, the distribution of male trade-union mem- bership between the city of New York and the remainder of the State is presented in parallel columns with the distribu- tion of male breadwinners in non-agricultural pursuits. In New York City one half of all breadwinners in 1900 were foreign-born, whereas in the remainder of the State three fourths were of native birth. At the same time New York City had more than its proportionate share of trade- 1 Fourth Annual Report of the Illinois Bureau of Statistics of Labor (1886), p. 228. * Massachusetts Labor Bulletin, No. 10, April, 1899, p. 55. Pratt, he. cit., p. 99. 342 Immigration and Labor TABLE 101. COMPARATIVE UNION MEMBERSHIP IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, I9OO. 1 Geographical division Union membership (male) Male breadwinners in non- agricultural pursuits per cent Thousands Per cent Ail Nativities Foreign-born Ratio to total State 234 146 88 100 62 38 100 56 44 New York City 11 Outside of New York City union membership. The margin in favor of New York City would be still greater if instead of all breadwinners indus- trial wage-earners alone were considered, the proportion of the latter being larger outside of the great cities than in cities with a population of over 3oo,ooo. 2 The figures are for the year 1900. The conditions have not changed since, as appears from Table 102 on p. 343- The membership of the trade unions in New York City more than doubled from 1900 to 1910, whereas in the re- mainder of the State it increased by less than three fifths. This difference was not due to a proportionate increase of the population of New York City compared with the urban population of the remainder of the State: while the popu- lation of New York City increased somewhat faster than the urban population outside of New York City, the relative number of organized workers in New York City increased still faster. The figures furnish unmistakable evidence of greater progress of trade unions at the gate of the United States, parallel with the growth of the foreign-born popu- 1 Report of the New York Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1910, vol. ii., pp. xlix., L, 15. Occupations, XII. Census, Tables 41 and 43. Hourwich, loc. cit.. Journal of Political Economy, April, 1911, P- 324- Labor Organizations 343 TABLE 102. COMPARATIVE UNION MEMBERSHIP IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 1 900-1910. x Both sexes Year State New York City Outside of New York City Union membership: Absolute number u Increase 1900 1910 Thousands 245 48-2 Per cent Thousands 154 338 Per cent no Thousands 91 144 Per cent V8 Relative number: .8 3-1 14. O 6.6 14. O Italy 2.6 O 7 Russia and Austria-Hungary (Hebrews) a O O.O The proportion of English and Irish paupers in Boston in the '30*8 and '40*8 was about the same as in New York City half a century later: TABLE 108. COMPARATIVE PERCENTAGE OF ENGLISH AND IRISH PAUPERS IN BOSTON, 1837-1845, AND IN NEW YORK CITY, 1885-1895.' In Boston In New York City 1837-1840 6l . 7 1841-1845 59-2 1885-1895 64.8 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., pp. 460, 480. * Census of Boston, 1845, PP- no-ill. Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 480. Pauperism and Crime 357 It is evident from the preceding figures that recent immi- gration is not responsible for the high percentage of pauper- ism among the old English-speaking immigrants. Dr. Kate H. Claghorn, after an exhaustive statistical study of immigration in its relation to pauperism, comes to the conclusion that pauperism " is the result of a considerable period of life and experiences here." It is not the able- bodied workmen and their families, but the industrial invalids that make up the lists of applicants for charity. * Unemployment is responsible for but a minority of the cases of pauperism, as appears from Table 109, based upon a classification of 7225 Charity Organization Society cases in New York City: TABLE 109. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF CHARITY CASES IN NEW YORK CITY, BY NATIVITY AND CAUSES OF NEED (YEAR). 3 Per cent of total for each nationality Nativity Unem- ployment Other mis- fortune All other causes American 24. 57 44 27 *i 16 English 24.68 4.^ .4-7 ?i.85 Irish 18.87 47. -IQ a-i.74 German. 28 62 SO 66 20. 72 Italian Ibid., p. 370. 4 Ibid. The Garment Workers 367 scrutiny. Indeed, if the fact that the older immigrants "demand a higher wage" be sufficient to secure to them an actual increase in weekly earnings, then there is nothing to prevent them from demanding and securing a higher wage, notwithstanding the competition of the recent immi- grants. If, on the contrary, the older employees are unable to meet the competition of the recent immigrants, then the increased period of residence could not help them to a "general increase in weekly earnings." The fallacy of the Commission's reasoning is due to the fact that it mistakes cause for effect: higher earnings are not the effect, but the cause, of a higher standard of living. Wages in the labor market are not determined by the amount the worker desires to spend, but by the services he is able to render. It is plain that competition would not permit the clothing manufacturer to pay higher wages to an older employee merely as a reward for long residence, if recent immigrants could be hired to do the same work more cheaply. If the older employees are able to command, not merely to "de- mand, " a higher wage, it is evidently because their services are worth more than the "inexperienced labor" of the newcomers. And it is equally evident that th!e immigrants who "must have work on landing in New York, and . . . find their way to the clothing manufactories," 1 do not compete with the older employees for the higher positions requiring experience. But it is said that the new immigrants "annually crowd the shops of the city (of New York) in thousands, forcing workers who have preceded them to move up in the scale of occupation or to enter other employment. . . . Some of the displaced workers have opened tailoring or repair shops of their own, others have gone into the shops of custom tailors, and many have entered other lines of work."* In every-day language, the opening of a shop by a former wage- worker is not called "displacement," but advance- * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 1 1, p. 370. *Ibid. 368 Immigration and Labor ment. Custom tailoring requires a higher grade of skill than the manufacturing of ready-made clothing. If a clothing worker vacates his place in the factory to accept a better position with a custom tailor and the vacancy is filled by a new immigrant, no one in the trade will conceive the change as "displacement" of the older employee by a new hand. There remain only the undefined "other lines of work," into which the incoming thousands are said to have crowded those of their predecessors whom they could not "force" to move up. A sidelight upon this residue is thrown by the narrative of the history of the clothing industry in Baltimore. The first people employed in the clothing shops of that city were the Germans, who entered the country in large numbers immediately after the Civil War. Since that time the Russian Hebrews, Lithuan- ians, Poles, Italians, and Bohemians have settled in the city and found employment in the clothing shops, displacing the Germans in the unskilled occupations, and forcing them up into higher work. It is also noticed that, as the Russian Hebrews and Poles work up into the skilled occupations, the Germans leave the industry and enter new fields. This displacement seems to be self-displacement, as there is work for all more work than there are laborers but the Germans are pro- gressive, and as the new races have engaged in the clothing industry they have risen in the scale of occupations, and in many instances have left the industry and found employment in other skilled trades. 1 Thus we learn that, at least in Baltimore, those who have left the industry have "found employment in other skilled trades," and that the "displacement" is therefore "self- displacement"; in other words, no displacement at all. Expressed in more exact language, the report of the Com- mission Shows +Vo+ *V ^k>thJT1 industry of Pfl]tJTnnrfi has gsosm jrnore rapidly than thft supply nf Uhnr. The ex- pansion of the industry created new positions for skilled workers; these positions were filled first by Germans, next by Russian Hebrews and Poles. This expansion not being confined to the manufacturing of clothing, other indus- 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 11, p. 411. The Garment Workers 369 tries offered opportunities of which the Germans availed themselves. It is reasonable to assume that if there is "more work than there are laborers" in Baltimore, the clothing manufacturers of that city would have sufficient enterprise to import some of the thousands who "crowd the shops" of New York City. The fact is that the expansion of the clothing indus- try in New York has been a great deal faster than in Balti- more, as appears from Table no below. It is therefore quite probable that the relation between the demand for, and supply of, labor in the shops of New York is the same as in Baltimore. TABLE no. COMPARATIVE GROWTH OF THE VALUE OF THE PRODUCTS OF THB CLOTHING INDUSTRY IN NEW YORK AND BALTIMORE, 1 890-1905. x City i Millions of dollars Per cent of increase 1890 1900 1905 1890-1900 1900-1905 1890-1905 New York. . . , Baltimore 1 119 so 206 20 306 23 73 25 49 IS 157 44 The statistics of the Immigration Commission do not dis-f close any tendency on the part of the new immigrant racesV to accept lower wages than the immigrants of older races. \ (See Table in on page 370.) The percentage of recent German immigrants earning $15 a week or over is much less than the percentage of Hebrews and Russians and about the same as the percentage of Italians with the same aver- age earnings. On the opposite end, the percentage of Germans earning less than $10 a week within the first five years of their residence in the United States is some- what greater than that of Hebrews, Russians, Poles, and 1 Census Reports, Manufactures, 1905, Part I, Table CLXVIII., p. ccxxxiii. 370 Immigration and Labor Bohemians. These figures show that the "new immi- gration" does not underbid the immigrants of the older races. On the other hand, the variation in the earnings of representatives of each race indicates that the rate of wages r is. not determined by racial factors, but depends upon ? the personal qualifications and opportunities of individual \workers. TABLE in. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF FOREIGN-BORN ADULT MALE CLOTHING WORKERS, 1 8 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER, RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES LESS THAN FIVE YEARS, BY RACE AND WEEKLY EARNINGS . T Race Under Jio $10 to 15 $15 and over Hebrew (not Russian) Hebrew (Russian) 33-9 -in. I 42.2 -JQ.Q 23-9 21 .O 75. -I 46.8 17.9 4O.2 10.8% IO.O Italian North 4.C -i 45. -i 0.4 4.O.O to -o SI .4 9 8.6 Italian, South S7.6*> -la.o 8.5 Polish ' f VI 4 54. l3. 8.5 Bohemian and Moravian. 35-5 ot *<* 57 -0\ 7-5 The Immigration Commission speaks in general terms of the "availability of cheap woman and child labor of the immigrant households" for locating "men's and women's clothing manufacturing establishments" in certain districts "developed in connection with some of the principal indus- tries of the country." * But the statistics of the Commission show that the earnings of recent immigrant women and children in the clothing industry are higher than those of ( native Americans. Thus, adult Russian Hebrew women averaged $8.09 per week, Polish women, $8.07, North Italian women, $7.54, whereas native women of native American parentage earned only $7.41 per week. The majority of Polish women (55.4 per cent) earned more than $7.50 per 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 1 1, p. 301, Table 35. vol. i, p. 541. The Garment Workers 371 week, while the majority of American women of native parentage (57.2 per cent) earned less than that amount. 1 The same is true of girls between the ages of 14 and 18. Russian Hebrew girls earned on an average $6.13 per week, other Hebrew girls $6.24, South Italian girls $5.56, Polish girls $5.25, whereas native American girls of native parent- age made only $5.02 per week. Nearly one half (45.9 per cent) of the latter earned less than $5 while only a little over one fourth (27.4 per cent) .of the Russian Hebrew girls earned less than that amount. 2 Confronted with these facts, Professors Jenks and Lauck_ seek to explain them by the assumption that "the lower earnings of the American women" are due "to their in- ability and disinclination to work such long hours as the v foreign-born females in the case of certain piece-rate occu- pations, as, for example, the clothing industry. 1 ' 3 This explanation, however, is purely a matter of conjecture* since the Immigration Commission has made no inquiries regarding hours of labor in the clothing industry. As shown above, the hours were long in the factories and sweat- shops when the women workers were all Americans, and were reduced with the coming of immigrants. The inquiry of the Industrial Commission concerning the hours of labor in the clothing industry in Pennsylvania brought out the fact that the working hours averaged ten per day alike in the city shops where the employees were Jews and Italians, and in country shops, where none but Americans were employed. 4 The investigations of the Industrial Commission also disclosed the fact that in the beginning of the twentieth century, as half a century before, the American country ^ workers were willing to work for lower wages than the immigrants in the cities. In the country districts of Pennsylvania the garment workers are Americans, some of whom can be further distinguished as "Pennsyl- 1 Reports of ihe Immigration Commission, vol. n, p. 293, Table 26. 2 Ibid., p. 298, Table 32. * Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., p. 143. Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 725. 372 Immigration and Labor vania Dutch." In New Jersey they are Americans and German- Americans ... but there is no evidence of a lower standard of living than among their American neighbors. In spite of this, it is these people and their American co-workers who are accepting a lower rate of wages than the Jews in the city. ' The most striking difference between the country and town shops is that the operators in the town shops are invariably men and in the country shops they are women. . . . The women coat operators in the country who get the highest wages paid women receive $5.34, and the city women basters on vests are receiving $6.59. Here we find women in the city engaged in a lower class of work and receiving higher pay than the women in the country who are doing the highest grade of work. 3 The same difference existed between the wages of men in city and country shops: Jewish pressers in the city averaged $11.38 per week, whereas American pressers in the country earned only $7.62 per week. 3 Because the native American country workers were willing to accept lower wages than the recent immigrants in the cities, the contractors found it profitable to give more steady employment to country than to city workers. While the latter averaged but twenty-eight working weeks in the year, the former were given forty-four weeks, with the result that their annual earnings at lower rates of wages exceeded the earnings of city workers at higher rates. 4 What enables the American country workers of Pennsyl- vania to underbid the Jewish garment workers of Philadel- phia is the fact that the country home workers are usually simply supplementing other earnings. They are farmers' wives and daughters and those of farm laborers. They make clothing in the intervals of housework and farm work, for most of them help in the haying and harvesting. . . . Where the shop replaces the farming-out system, the employees are drawn from these same farmers' families, and a low standard of wages, in- fluenced by the home earnings, prevails throughout.' Another no less important cause of the "low standard of wages" of native American country workers is their 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 730. a Ibid., pp. 727-729- 3 Ibid., p. 726. Ibid., p. 725. $ Ibid., pp. 727-728. The Garment Workers 373 V isolation, in consequence of which "they must accept his [the contractor's] rate of payment offered through the driver who delivers the goods. " * The Southern and East- ern European clothing workers in the cities, on the contrary, are comparatively well organized. As shown in Chapter XV the percentage of organized workers among them is above the average for the country. Their capacity for concerted action finds full expression only in strikes which rally around the unions many workers not regularly affiliated with them. The highest per cent of employees joining in strikes in 1887-1905 was found among clothing workers, as shown in Table 112: TABLE 112. PER CENT OF STRIKING EMPLOYEES IN THE CLOTHING INDUSTRY AND IN ALL INDUSTRIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1887-1905.* Industry Male Female Women's clothing 86.04. 62. II 81.84 4V 06 All industries 44. qi 28. IS The strikes were, as a rule, led by organizations. Of the 20,559 establishments involved in strikes during the twenty- five year period from 1881 to 1905, in only 355 were the strikes not ordered by labor organizations, the annual averages being 835 and 13 establishments, respectively. The proportion of unorganized strikes among workers on men's clothing was 10 per cent; among workers on women's clothing 1 6 per cent, whereas the average for all industries was 31 percent. 3 The percentage of thoroughly successful strikes of clothing workers for the period 1881-1905 was much above the average, viz. : the percentage in establishments manufacturing men's 1 Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv., p. 728. a Twenty- first Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, pp. 90-91. *Ibid., pp. 35-36. 374 Immigration and Labor clothing, 75.51, and in establishments manufacturing women 's clothing 66.37, whereas the average for all indus- tries in the United States was only 47.94.' These figures will enable the student to appraise at its true value the conclusion of the Immigration Commission that "as a gen- eral proposition it may be said that all improvement in conditions and increases in rates of pay have been secured in spite of the presence of the recent immigrant." 2 The strike statistics published by the United States Bureau of Labor permit of a comparison between the recent period beginning with the fiscal year 1895, when the immi- grants from Southern and Eastern Europe for the first time outnumbered all others, and the earlier period from January i, 1881, to June 30, 1894. During the 8o's the principal nationalities employed in the clothing shops were the Germans and the Irish: 3 since 1895 the Jews and the Italians have become the predominating element among the workers. It appears that during the thirteen and a half years previous to the fiscal year 1895 the average annual number of strikers in the clothing industry was 9,094, and during the eleven and a half years following it rose to 38,683.' This is the unbiased testimony of figures in answer to the sweeping generalizations of the Immigration Commis- sion about the reluctance of the Southern and Eastern Europeans "to enter labor disputes involving loss of time," their "ready acceptance of a low wage and existing working conditions" and "willingness seemingly to accept in- definitely without protest certain wages and conditions of employment." 5 1 Twenty-first Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, pp. 81-82. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I , p. 540. *Ibid., vol. i, pp. 516-517. Computed from Annual Reports of the Commissioner of Labor: X., p. 1567; XVI., pp. 15, 34, 355; XXL, p. 16. Reports of the Immigration Commission^ vol. i, pp. 530-540. CHAPTER XVIII THE COTTON MILLS THE cotton mills furnish a good field for the study of the effects of immigration upon the condition of labor in the United States. According to the investiga- tion of the Immigration Commission, 68.7 per cent of the operatives in the New England States were of foreign birth. The races of the "old immigration" were represented by 37.8 percent, and those of the "new immigration" by 30.9 per cent. 1 The latter are mostly recent arrivals. In 1900 the proportion of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe and their American-born children varied from 3.1 per cent in New Hampshire to 13.2 per cent in Massa- chusetts. 3 The Immigration Commission has obtained from one of the largest and oldest mill corporations figures showing the movement of wages since 1875.3 The movement may be divided into two periods: (i) from 1875 to 1898 and (2) from 1899 to 1908. The first period, when the cotton-mill operatives were practically all English-speaking, was one of intermittent advances and reductions; on the whole wages remained stationary. The second period, which is marked by the advent of the Southern and Eastern Euro- peans into the cotton mills, is conspicuous by an unin- terrupted upward movement of wages, which was checked only by the crisis of 1908. Still, even after the reduction 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, Table 7, pp. 14-15. Ibid., Table 19, p. 36. 3 2bid. t p. 291. 375 376 Immigration and Labor made on March 30, 1908, wages remained 15 per cent above the level of 1898. To be sure, the first period was one of falling prices, which enabled the cotton-mill opera- tives to maintain their usual standard of living notwith- standing the ' reductions in wages, whereas, on the other hand, the second period was one of rapidly rising prices which offset the increase in wages. It is therefore possible that the operatives were not better off during the later period of rising wages than during the earlier period. Still, assuming that every cut in wages merely restored the previous relation between earnings and the cost of living, it is plain that these reductions must have caused dissatis- faction among the wage-earners. However, the operatives of the New England cotton mills, all of them of Teutonic and Celtic stock, acquiesced in these reductions. On the other hand, though the advances in 1899-1907 may have been nullified by the rising cost of living, each increase in wages was nevertheless the outcome of successful bargaining by the operatives for better terms of employment. Still the question is whether the industrial expansion of the period from 1899 to 1907 might not have enabled the operatives to win more substantial advances had there been no immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. The only method by which such results could have been accom- plished was organization. The more recent immigrant employees from Southern and Eastern Europe and Asia, however, [says the Immigration Commission in its summary volume], have been a constant menace to the labor organi- zations, and have been directly and indirectly instrumental in weakening the unions and threatening their disruption. The divergence in lan- guage and the high degree of illiteracy and ignorance among the recent operatives have made their work of organization among them very difficult and expensive. 1 This conclusion is at variance with the facts recited in the special report of the Commission on " Cotton goods manufacturing in the North Atlantic States": 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 537. The Cotton Mills 377 "Fall River, Mass., is the only distinctly trade-union locality in New England," yet there, as elsewhere, the unions are confined to the skilled occupations, whereas the recent immigrants upon entering the cotton mills "take up unskilled work. . . . Many of them never advance beyond the unskilled work. These occupations are not organized, and the coming of the foreigner there does not concern the textile unions."* In Cohoes, N. Y., likewise, " the unions manifest little interest in the immigrant employees until they have advanced to the occupations controlled by the labor organizations." 2 It is evident that "their work of organization" among the unskilled immigrants could have been neither "difficult" nor "expensive." With regard to skilled occupations the Immigration Commission has reached two diametrically opposite con- clusions. In the abstract of the reports on immigrants in manufacturing and mining it maintains that the advancement in large numbers of the Southern and Eastern Euro- peans to weaving, spinning, beaming, and similar occupations has tended to bring them into more direct competition with the Americans and older immigrant employees, and to destroy the advantage which the latter class, who control and direct the unions, formerly possessed. * In the special report on cotton goods manufacturing the Commission says, on the contrary, that at no time has there been a sharp competition between unionized laborers on the one hand, and unorganized immigrant laborers in large numbers on the other. The latter conclusion is supported by the following statements : The textile occupations themselves, which are unionized, are protected, by the long time required to attain proficiency, from any sudden or immediate competition of unorganized foreigners. . . . Automatic or improved machinery might change this situation, and the coming of 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, pp. 123, 124. . * Ibid., p, 123. * Ibid., vol. I, p. 538. * Ibid., vol. 10, p. 124. 378 Immigration and Labor the immigrant might then be a more serious matter for the unions and might subject them to a disastrous competition from unorganized workers accustomed to a lower standard of living, . . . but that is not the condition at present. ... As regards the attitude of the immigrants toward the unions, when they advance to the skilled, organized occupations, even if they do not join the unions, they do not oppose the organization or cut under the unions 1 wages. ... At the time of strikes the recent immi- grants come into the unions in large numbers. ... In times of strikes these foreigners have stood by the unions, even though previously they may not have been members. 1 The recent immigrants have not been used as strike-breakers.* The only specific strike described in the report of the Commission took place in Lowell, Mass., 3 in 1903. It is characterized as "the only serious controversy between the cotton manufacturers and the operatives" of that city. The history of that controversy is briefly as follows. The mill owners having refused an increase in wages, the unions declared a strike. The mill owners on the same day re- sponded by a lockout. While the mills remained closed, pro-union meetings were held among the Greeks, the Poles, and the Portuguese, and organizations were formed among them. "At the commencement of the agitation for a ten per cent increase in wages, the membership of the unions constituted but a small fraction of the employees in the mills; gradually, however, this membership increased as the strike sentiment grew.*' The unions were defeated, how- ever, by an unexpected turn in the cotton market. The price of raw cotton began to rise to such an extent that the manu- facturers who had provided themselves with the necessary supply in advance were able to sell at a considerable profit. One mill actually declared a 4 per cent dividend, on the basis of raw cotton sold at a good advance, due to the high prices during the strike. In this way it would have been possible for them to minimize, or even neutralize entirely 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, pp. 124, 125. 'Ibid., vol. i, p. 538. For some unknown reasons, the name-of the city is hidden under the designation of "Community A." The disguise is betrayed, however, in Table 125 on p. 232, which is a reproduction of Table 24 on p. 45, where Lowell, Mass., is named. The Cotton Mills 379 the loss occasioned by the idleness of their plants caused by the strike. It thus became a matter of indifference to them whether work was resumed or not. When this situation generally became known the strike was doomed. 1 After a suspension of work lasting nine weeks the manu- facturers reopened the mills. From one third , to two thirds of the locked-out operatives returned to the mills on the first day. The ranks of the strikers began to weaken, and after staying out for three weeks the unions unanimously voted to call the strike off. a To form a fair judgment of the endurance shown by the Lowell strikers, the length of time they stayed out must be compared with the average duration of strikes in the cotton mills of Massachusetts. The races of Southern and Eastern Europe in 1909 supplied 34 per cent of the total number of operatives in the Lowell cotton mills. 3 In the State at large the proportion of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe and Asia among the mill operatives of the State varied as follows : TABLE 113. PERCENTAGE OF IMMIGRANTS FROM SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROPE AMONG THE TEXTILE MILL OPERATIVES OF MASSACHUSETTS, l88O- IQOO.* Mills , " Year Per cent Cotton (immigrants and their children). . . . Textile (immigrants only) 1900 1890 1880 13-2 2-3 05 The average duration of strikes in the cotton mills of Massachusetts for the twenty-year period from 1881 to 1900 was only thirty-six days. 5 Thus the length of time 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, voL I, pp. 292, 293. 1 Ibid. J Ibid., Table 130, p. 237. Ibid., Tables 14, 17, and 19. * Sixteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table 3, p. 216. 380 Immigration and Labor the Lowell strikers stayed out in 1903 was three quarters in excess of the average for the period when nearly all the operatives were of the English-speaking races. Going over the annals of the strikes in the cotton mills of Massa- chusetts from 1881-1890, when there were scarcely any immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe and Asia among the operatives, we find only one strike that can compare in extent with the Lowell strike of 1903; it was in 1889, when 9000 weavers in thirty-four mills at Fall River struck for a 10 per cent increase in wages. After staying out only seventeen days they returned to work on the old terms. x Thus when the Greek, Portuguese, and Polish strikers in 1903 surrendered after nine weeks of idleness, during which they received no aid from the unions, they gave an exhibition in endurance and adherence to a common purpose, that was far above the average for any race of cotton-mill operatives. Moreover, since the proportion of the strikers who returned to the mills on the first day varied from one third to two thirds, whereas the proportion of Southern and Eastern Europeans among the operatives was less than one third, 2 it is evident that a good many of the English-speaking operatives must have surrendered simultaneously with the Southern and Eastern Europeans. The history of this strike is prefaced by the Commission with the following remark: // is not thought that the presence of immigrants in such large numbers in Community A has exerted a decisive influence upon the success of trade- unionism in the community. The weakness of the unions in Community A is to be traced to less general causes of a local character. The reader is at a loss to reconcile this conclusion, and the facts leading up to it, with the general statement, 1 Tenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, vol. I, Table I, pp. 364-414- a In 1909 the proportion was 34 per cent, but in 1900 only 13.2 per cent; the proportion in 1903 must have been somewhere between these two figures. 3 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, p. 291. The Cotton Mills 381 quoted above from the abstract of the reports on immigrants in manufacturing and mining, to the effect that "the more recent immigrant employees from Southern and Eastern Europe and Asia . . . have been a constant menace to the labor organizations, and have been directly and indirectly instrumental in weakening the unions and threatening their disruption." 1 Considering : (1) That the unskilled operatives have at no time been organized ; (2) That the recent immigrants seldom advance to the skilled crafts ; (3) That when they do advance to skilled occupations they either join the unions of their crafts or stand by the unions though not affiliated with them; (4) That with the machinery heretofore in use there has been no room for competition between organized skilled operatives and unorganized immigrant unskilled la borers ; (5) That in past strikes the recent immigrants have stood by the strikers and have never acted as strike-breakers: It is evident that the presence of recent immigrants has been no hindrance to union activity. The failure of the unions to secure better terms from the mill corporations than they did must therefore be due to other causes than immigration. The real cause of low wages in the cotton mills of New England is the competition of the Southern cotton mills. The subject is only hinted at in the report of the Immigra- tion Commission. No immigrants being employed in the Southern mills, the latter were apparently considered beyond the scope of the Commission's investigation. A 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i., p. 537. Unfortu- nately, the full report on cotton manufacturing has been printed only as a Senate document and is accessible to a very limited number of readers, whereas the misleading conclusions of the abstract on immi- gration in manufacturing and mining have received wide circulation through the free mailing list of the Commission. 382 Immigration and Labor thorough discussion of the subject is found in the report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics for 1906. Comparing labor conditions in New England and South- ern mills, the Massachusetts report says, by inference, that when the sons and daughters of the farmers of the surrounding country were replaced in the Northern mills by foreigners, strikes and lockouts followed, and the doors were opened to the trade unions, with the result that hours of labor were reduced, wages were increased, and child labor was restricted. 1 The development of the cotton manufacturing industry in the South, with its natural advantages and "cheap labor," has made successful competition impossible for Massachusetts mills, unless Massachusetts will "retrograde and increase its hours of labor, reduce its wages, and employ its children to meet the South in a battle on its own ground. " a The ' 'cheap labor" of the Southern cotton mills is the labor of the native white of native stock, who constitute 99 per cent of all cotton-mill operatives in North Carolina, 97 per cent in Georgia and Alabama. 3 The average yearly earnings of the Southern operatives compared as follows with those of the New England operatives, many of whom were Southern and Eastern European, Armenian, and Syrian immigrants : 1 "When the native stock is all employed, the South must look to the immigrant, and then will come the test of her ability to withstand the enactment of just labor laws. She will be compelled to readjust her hours of labor, increase her wages, discharge her child labor, and open her doors to the trade union. She will go through the same experience as the North. The North's first operatives were the sons and daughters of the native farmers round about, but the grandchildren would not follow in their parents' footsteps, preferring to go into other business. This the South is finding to be the case with the children they are attempting to educate, and foreigners must soon be taken to replace them. Then will come a repetition of the experience of the Northern mills. Strikes and lockouts will follow." Thirty- Sixth Annual Report Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor (1906), Part II: Cotton Manufactures in Massachusetts and the Southern States, p. 102. Ibid., p. 1 06. Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 41 (computed). The Cotton Mills 383 TABLE 114. AVERAGE YEARLY EARNINGS OF COTTON-MILL OPERATIVES, BY SEX AND AGE IN THE PRINCIPAL STATES, 1904. x State Men Women Children under I 6 years New Hampshire $4.18 $7-17 $188 Massachusetts . . ... 4.IO 74.0 27-1 Rhode Island 4.00 2-14. 222 Connecticut 5Q2 7.2 c 2IO New York JQ4. 'MO 1 88 524. 714. IQ-l Norfh Carolina 2^6 IQ4, T 7.0 South Carolina ... . 24.4, IQO *o" 1 18 Georgia . . 28l TOO 126 Alabama . . 272 2OS T7O As can be seen from the preceding table the average earnings of adult men in South Carolina are only slightly above the average earnings of children in Massachusetts; the highest average earnings of adult men in the Southern mills are much below the average earnings of women employed in the Northern mills. This is a reversal of the usual relation between men's and women's wages. It is this competition of the cheap American labor of the Southern mills that keeps down the wages of the Southern and East- ern European, Armenian, and Syrian immigrants employed in the cotton mills of the North. 1 Census of Manufactures, 1905, vol. i., Table 5, p. 188. CHAPTER XIX THE WOOLEN MILLS THE recent strike in the woolen mills of Lawrence has forcibly drawn public attention to the condition of labor in the woolen industry. It developed in the hearings held before the Committee of the House of Representatives, and through investigations made by leading magazine writers and social workers, that m this Industry^ protected from foreign competition by the tariff and from domestic competition by a high degree of centralization, the wages of married men were insufficient for the support of their families. The fact that the strikers were mostly recent immigrants diverted the discussion from the issues of the strike to the subject of immigration. It was readily be- lieved that they had been " imported" because of their low standard of living, for the express purpose of reducing the wages of native American and other English-speaking operatives. Professor Lauck, author of the report of the Immigration Commission on "Immigrants in Industries," writing in the North American Review on the Lawrence strike, claimed that the American mill hand . . . because of his inability to work under the same conditions and at the same wages as the recent immigrant, has been forced to leave the woolen-goods manufacturing industry. 1 It has been taken as a self-evident truth that the wages of the recent immigrants were low because they lived in con- 'W. Jett Lauck: "The Lesson from Lawrence," North American Review, May, 1912, p. 664. 384 The Woolen Mills 385 gested quarters, and because they were underfed and poorly clad. There has accordingly been little disposition among people usually friendly to labor to waste sympathy upon men and women who were "willing" to deny themselves the barest necessities of life for the mere privilege of work- ing in the mills. "The lesson from Lawrence" is to these good people that the solution of the labor problem is in keeping out the foreign laborer. As usual in all arguments inspired by this theory, no regard is paid to historical perspective. The American operative was not "forced to leave the woolen-goods manufacturing industry" by the coming of the recent immigrants, because he had left it long before. According to the census of 1880, there were among the 10,395 operatives of the cotton and woolen mills of Law- rence only 41 1 1 native Americans, i. e., only 40 per cent, in- cluding persons of native and of foreign parentage. The majority were immigrants from Ireland, Great Britain, and Canada, with a sprinkling of Germans (4 per cent). 1 The immigrants from all other countries numbered I per cent of all operatives. Thus, if the prevalence of immigrants among the operatives be the result of the "forcing out" of native Americans, it is clear that they were forced out by English-speaking immigrants. Even as recently as 1900 the immigrants from Italy, Russia, Poland, and Austria-Hungary and their American- born children, employed in the woolen and worsted mills of Lawrence, numbered only 721 persons of both sexes, i. e., 10 per cent of all operatives, whereas the total number of native Americans of native parentage did not exceed 374, i. e., 5.2 per cent of the total force. 2 If it be true that all but this little remnant of American operatives had been "forced out" of the mills, is there any reason to attribute their ousting to the pressure of the 10 per cent made up of "recent immigrants" rather than to that of the 85 per cent * Population, X. Census, Table XXXVI., p. 882. 1 Occupations at the XII. Census Table 43. 386 Immigration and Labor representing the English-speaking immigrants and their native-born children? Suppose the 10 per cent contingent of recent immigrants forced out as many Americans, there were still 90 per cent of the places in the mills to be filled, and the contest for these places was between native Ameri- cans of native parentage and English-speaking immigrants and their children. Detailed figures are given in Table 1 15. TABLE 115. DISTRIBUTION OF THE OPERATIVES OF BOTH SEXES IN THE WOOLEN AND WORSTED MILLS OF LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS, BY PARENT NATIVITY, 1900.* Nativity Number Percent Total 7I8O IOO.O Native parentage 374 5.2 6806 Q4.8 Native born 2005 27.O 4801 66. Q Country of birth of parents: Canada (English) 182 2.6 Canada (French) 673 0.4 Great Britain 1^61 18.9 Ireland 2078 28.9 Germany 872 12.2 7 .O Austria-Hungary 45 .6 Italy 402 5.6 Poland no 1.0 Russia 144 2.O Other countries and mixed parentage. . 911 12.7 It is only since the federal census of 1900 that the immi- grants from Southern and Eastern Europe and Syria have become a conspicuous element among the woolen-mill operatives of Lawrence. The report of the Immigration Commission contains figures which "are practically a census of the local establishments " for 1909. According to those figures, 35.5 per cent of the operatives were immigrants 1 Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 43. The Woolen Mills 387 from Southern and Eastern Europe and Turkey. But the proportion of native Americans of native parentage was 6.9 per cent, as against 5.2 per cent in 1900. Since the advent of the "new immigrants" the number of native Ameri- cans of native parentage employed in the woolen and worsted mills of Lawrence has more than doubled. The proof of this fact is given in Table 116 next following: TABLE 116. NUMBER OF NATIVE AMERICANS OF NATIVE PARENTAGE EMPLOYED IN THE WOOLEN AND WORSTED MILLS OF LAWRENCE, IQOO AND 1909. x 1900 1909 Per cent increase 1900-1909 Sex Woolen mill operatives Worsted mill operatives Textile mill operatives not otherwise specified. 3 Total Male Female.. . Total. 142 147 33 52 45 63 22O 262 690 545 213 108 289 85 108 482 1235 156 The only inference justified by the figures of the Immigra- tion Commission is that the same economic conditions which have brought the recent immigrants to the Lawrence woolen mills have also induced increasing numbers of native Americans of native stock to accept employment in the same mills. In 1909, the average number of wage-earners in the woolen mills was 20,203, as against an average number of 12,216 employed in igo4. 3 These figures are 1 Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 43. Report of the Immigra- tion Commission, vol. 10, Table 81, p. 742. The same figures are dupli- cated in Table 85, p. 752. 2 As some of these operatives may have been employed in woolen and worsted mills, their total number is included in this comparative table. The percentage of increase is thereby reduced below the actual figure. * XIIL Census, vol. ix: Manufacturers, p. 527. 388 Immigration and Labor indicative of a great expansion of the industry in recent years, which has created new places both for native Ameri- cans and for new immigrants. What has been the effect of this expansion upon the rates of wages? Professor Lauck, speaking for the Immi- gration Commission, holds that "the rate of wages in the presence of a large supply of immigrant laborers tends to decline." 1 This obiter dictum, however, is unsupported by figures. The statistics of wages quoted further in the report decidedly contradict the opinion of their compiler. In the thirteen occupations selected by him for comparison, " these figures indicate an apparent increase of 19.65 per cent in the rate of weekly wages . . . during the past twenty years." In another mill the average earnings of weavers show "an increase of 75 per cent." 3 If there be such a tendency as that enunciated by Professor Lauck, its operation has apparently been suspended at Lawrence during the past twenty years. The statistics of the Immigration Commission furnish material for a comparison of the variation in the rates of wages in the presence and in the absence of the recent immigrant labor supply, viz., from 1889 to 1899 and from 1899 to 1909. In 1890 the population of Lawrence num- bered in all 159 immigrants fr^m Austria, Portugal, Italy, Russia, and Turkey. 3 By 1900, as stated, their number in the woolen mills reached only 8.6 per cent of all opera- tives. Their presence in the mills was certainly a negligible factor in determining the rates of wages. In the ten years following, however, their numbers increased to 35.5 per cent of the total force. As elsewhere, they have taken over "the simpler, cruder processes, " while the English-speaking operatives have been assigned to the higher grades of work. 4 It is therefore, possible to observe the effect of recent immi- gration upon the rates of wages for unskilled labor, as well as the effect of the absence of ther competition of recent 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, p. 773. Ibid., pp. 773, 774. i Ibid., p. 750. 4 ibid., p. 772, The Woolen Mills 389 immigrants upon the rates of wages in those occupations to which they are not admitted. The comparative rates of increase in the wage scales are presented in Table 117. TABLE 117. PER CENT INCREASE IN THE RATES OF WAGES PAID BY ONE OF THE TWO LARGEST WORSTED MILLS IN LAWRENCE TO SKILLED AND UNSKILLED OPERATIVES, IN 1889-1899, AND 1899-1909.* Occupation Per week Per hour 1889-1899 1899-1909 1889-1899 1899-1909 Skilled: Loom fixers . . . . 0.0 4.7 0.0 16.7 5-3 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 16.4 23.3 5.9 31.2 j 8.3) ji8.o[ 134-3) 12. 1 5-5 28.9 16.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 5.3 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 20.5 0.0 9.5 35- 7 x 25.0 I 35 ' ? (40.0) 16.0 10. 33-4 20.8 Wool sorters Warp dressers Unskilled: Doffers Spinners . . Comb minders Drawing girls: Highest grade Lowest grade Dyehouse hands The preceding table demonstrates : (1) That from 1889 to 1899, the rates of wages of the skilled operatives remained stationary, and that they increased from 1899 to 1909, i. e., during the period of the great influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe and Turkey; (2) That in three of the unskilled occupations the rates of wages remained stationary in 1889-1899, in the absence of "the new immigration,'* and increased in 1899-1909, in the presence of that immigration ; that the wages of spinners were raised during the earlier period 5.3 per cent and during 1 The percentages have been computed from the rates per week and per hour quoted in the Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 10, p. 774. Occupations for which two or more rates were given in 1899 and only one in 1889 and 1909 have been omitted. 390 Immigration and Labor the recent period from 8.3 to 34.3 per cent; that the wages of doffers increased during the first period 16.7 per cent and during the second, 3 1.2 per cent; (3) That since the immigrants from Southern and East- ern Europe and Asiatic Turkey have begun to enter the unskilled occupations in large numbers, the percentage of increase in the wages of unskilled operatives has been greater than the percentage of increase in the rates of skilled workers, who are practically all of the English-speaking races. If the rates of wages are affected by the racial charac- teristics of the immigrants, then the preceding figures admit of no other conclusion than that the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe and Asiatic Turkey have a racial "tendency" to push the wages upward, whereas the English-speaking workmen are willing to acquiesce for a long time (10 years) in such wages as the recent immigrants would consider unsatisfactory. This palpably unsound conclusion is the logical consequence of the false assumption underlying the report of the Immigra- tion Commission on immigrants in manufacturing. The only other possible interpretation of the preceding table of variations in the rates of wages is that the wages remained stationary in 1889-1899 because the growth of the woolen industry was slow during those years and that the wages increased in 1899-1909 owing to the rapid expansion of the woolen industry, which created an active demand for labor. The rapid increase of the number of recent immigrant em- ployees was the effect of the increased demand for labor at higher wages. The growth of a Western city, like Los Angeles, from a city of 102,000 inhabitants in 1900 to one of 319,000 in 1910 through migration of native citizens, is accepted by the American public as a matter of course. But the average American, being out of touch with the strange peoples whom he sees filling the mills of feis growing city, does not realize the simple fact that "the channel of communication between the economic opportunity or labor demand in the The Woolen Mills 391 United States and the labor supply abroad is ordinarily the oral or written accounts of immigrants who have worked in the worsted and cotton mills." The native resident of Lawrence, who may never have been as far away from home as New York, cannot imagine how these thousands of strangers could have found their way to his town without "some organized effort." "Everywhere one goes in the city tales are told of the efforts made by one woolen com- pany to procure laborers in Europe." 1 The Commission has made an effort to investigate these tales with the following results: One informant had a cousin in Glasgow who had written concerning pictures of the new mill which he had seen, and concerning an agent of the woolen company. Nothing more definite could be learned. Another informant who was much exercised over reports of this sort had written to the Secretary of the Wool Sorters' Union of Bradford, England, a district said to have been well covered with advertising matter, asking for information. The English trade-union official had, however, seen no advertisements of this sort. A clergyman in close touch with the industrial situation expressed himself as " convinced that agents are sent to Europe to get labor." The priest of the Italian congregation, one of the largest of the foreign churches the greater part of whose member- ship has come from abroad within the past few years states that accounts of the mills and assertions that "wages of $10 a week" are paid have appeared in Italian and other European newspapers.* It is evident that in this age of the daily press news of the American labor market travels fast all over the globe. It is not at all impossible that the Table on page 774 of the Report of the Immigration Commission on Cotton Goods Manufacturing, showing that some classes of the operatives in the Lawrence mills earned as much as $14, $15, and even $16 a week, may yet be republished in some Old World newspaper and have the effect of stimulating the immigra- tion of a fresh supply of Italian or Syrian laborers for the Lawrence woolen mills. In view of the general conclusion of the Immigration 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. IO., p. 770. 'Ibid. 392 Immigration and Labor Commission that the recent immigrants are willing to work "indefinitely without protest" for low wages, 1 it is interest- ing to note the characterization of the recent immigrants by a number of superintendents and foremen of the two largest Lawrence mills. "While opinions differ somewhat, there appears to be a considerable uniformity of judgment as to their characteristics." The Italians are quick to leave their positions if they see any apparent advantage elsewhere. One mill superintendent stated that "they no sooner get a job than they want something better; they work in droves; discharge one and they all go." a That such characteristics are favorable to concerted action for economic improvement, has been demonstrated by the recent strike of the polyglot working force at the Lawrence mills. An observer whose sympathies were with old-line trade-unionism, noted with surprise that "the capacity of this great host of recent immigrants, represent- ing a number of supposedly alienated nationalities, for continuous, effective solidarity is one of the revelations of the present strike." 3 The measure of success achieved by these alien strikers can be realized by comparison with the statistics of strikes for the twenty-year period 1881-1900, when the operatives in the woolen and worsted mills of Massachusetts were practically all of the English-speaking races. During that period there were in all 81 strikes, of which only 9 were declared by labor organizations, while 72 were unorganized movements, like the recent strike at Lawrence. The aggregate number of strikers in the State of Massachusetts for the twenty years was only 5618, i. e., about one third of the number engaged in the one recent strike at Lawrence. The aggregate number thrown out of employment by the strikes was 10,144 for the whole period, but 16,117 opera- 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 541. 1 Ibid., vol. 10, p. 771. T\it, Survey, March 16, 1912, p. 1930: "The Clod Stirs. " By Robert A. Woods, head worker of South End House of Boston. The Woolen Mills 393 tives remained at work while the strikes were on. Of the 83 mills involved only 31 were forced to close while 52 were able to run with the majority that remained at work. * Thus with all odds against them, the recent immigrants speaking in sixteen different languages, have given proof of far greater cohesion than the English-speaking operatives of former years. x Sixteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table iv. t pp. 332-355- CHAPTER XX THE IRON AND STEEL WORKERS THE twelve-hour day, the twenty-four-hour shift, and Sunday labor, not as an emergency, but as an integral part of the system, have of late caused wide discussion of the iron and steel industry. The public conscience demanded to know who was responsible for those labor conditions. The offenders were easily discovered. Inas- much as three fourths of the unskilled men working those long hours were found to be Southern and Eastern Euro- peans, it became evident that it was they who were to blame for accepting such intolerable working conditions. A representative of a labor constituency, speaking on the floor of Congress, declared that "in the steel mills of Pittsburgh, Chicago, and Milwaukee, where thirty years ago the so-called princes of labor used to get from $10 to $15 a day, the modern white coolies get $1.75 for twelve hours a day, seven days in the week," the change being due to the "Slavonians, Italians, Greeks, Russians, and Armenians," who "have been brought into this country by the million 1 ' and "simply because they have a lower stand- ard of living . . . have crowded out the Americans, Germans, Englishmen, and Irishmen, " from the mills. x Such generalizations as these represent the popular con- ception of the causes of long hours and low wages in the iron and steel industry. The principal fallacy underlying 'Speech of Hon. Victor L. Berger,-of Wisconsin, in the House of Representatives, Wednesday, June 14, 1911. Congressional Record, pp. 2026-2030. 394 The Iron and Steel Workers 395 this interpretation has been shown in Chapter VII.: there has been no "crowding out" of American, English, Irish, or German steel workers by immigrants "brought" from Southern and Eastern Europe. The development of the iron and steel industry has been so rapid that all but a small percentage of the English-speaking workmen have been advanced to higher positions and their places have been filled with Southern and Eastern Europeans. The new immigrants do not compete with the native and older immigrant workmen, and can therefore not affect their wages. 4fc The parallel between the "princes of labor" and the "white coolies" is equaljpr without an historical foundation. Princes have at all times been few. "The old reputation of the steel industry as one of exceptionally high wages is false so far as the rank and file are concerned," says Mr. Fitch of the Pittsburgh Survey staff, who has made a study of the steel workers, "neither, on the other hand, should it be singled out as an unusual type, as an industry in which the majority of the men are paid at the lowest rates." 1 The rollers, heaters, and other skilled men, whose earnings in the early days often exceeded the salary of the superin- tendent, were only a small fraction of the total force. The high earnings of the few skilled men often repre- sented profit rather than wages. In the early '80 's the contract system was the prevailing method of hiring labor in the mills: A man would contract with the company to run a single mill, from the furnaces to the piling beds of the shears, and like any other contractor he derived his profit from the margin between what the company paid him for the tonnage turned out and what he paid the men for it. The contractor, while usually known as the roller, frequently did no work at all, having two practical rollers employed on the mill. At the same time he secured a considerable income for himself by paying the men as low wages as possible, and steel workers got a reputation for being very highly paid workmen on account, of the large earnings of these contractors. A statement from the proprietor of one of the "largest rolling mills in 1 John A. Fitch, " The Steel Workers." The Pittsburgh Survey, p. 150. 396 Immigration and Labor the District," regarding wages paid in his mill in 1881-1882, was to the effect that under the contract system one steel worker had made $25,000 in a year. A sheet shearer made $12.00 per day and paid his helper $2.00. A hammerman in charge of both turns made $i 7.00 per day and paid his helper $2.50.' The proportion of employees who were paid each rate of wages in the rolling mills of Ohio in 1884, when the number of Southern and Eastern Europeans among them was negligible, appears from Table 118. The number of TABLE -C/ llO^k SELECTS? ROLLING f CLASSIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES IN SELECTEU ROLLING MILLS OF OHIO BY RATES OF WEEKLY WAGES, 1884.' Total Rates of weekly wages Skilled* Semi- skilled Laborers Number Per cent Under j $IOtOj 10 \12 699 360 699 360 32-3 16.9 $12 to* 5l5 199 199 9 .6 $15 to 1 >i8 95 95 4-5 $18 to \ $25 to J ^25 flO 415 4 419 H7 19.6 6.9 $30 to $60 158 158 7-5 $60 and over 57 57 2.7 Total 777 298 1059 2134 100.0 "princes of labor" did not exceed 57 in a total force of 2134, i. e., 2.7 per cent. On the other hand, the number of "white coolies" who were paid less than $10 a week, i. e., less than $1.75 per day, was then as high as one third of the total force, and those who were paid less than $12 a week numbered nearly one half of all employees. There is no reason to assume that the wages in Ohio materially 1 Fitch, loc. /., p. 99. 'Report of the Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1885, Table 51, pp. 185-186. The statistics comprise only those mills for which complete data were available. Includes: Rollers, nailers, heaters, and puddlers. The Iron and Steel Workers 397 differed from those paid at the time in other centers of the iron and steel industry. The Immigration Commission made a comparative statistical study of the rates of wages paid by one steel company at different periods, going as far back as 1880, and reached the following conclusion: An inspection of the wage scale paid by the steel company during the past eighteen years the period marked by the coming of the immigrants in greatest numbers reveals the fact that wages have risen and fallen in good and bad times equally for skilled labor, largely free from direct immigration competition, and for unskilled labor, now largely per- formed by immigrants. 1 The wage scale appearing in the report includes no rolling mills where exceptionally high rates were earned by a few men of special skill. The highest rate appearing in the scale for 1 880 is $3 per day paid to engineers ; the highest in 1885 is $3.42 for brick masons. Neither of these two classes were iron and steel workers in a proper sense. The highest paid among iron and steel workers proper in 1880 were boiler-makers, whose maximum rate was $2.75. But the wages of laborers in 1880 were as low as $1.10, and in 1885 as low as $i. There was a general drop in the rates of wages at the blast furnaces and in the Bessemer department between 1880 and 1885, when immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was insignificant. There was also a drop in the rates for several occupations from 1890 to 1895, which was obviously due to the effects of the crisis of 1893. Since 1895 wages at the blast furnaces and in the Bessemer department have been on the increase, while in the mechanical department, the wages of skilled mechanics have been subject to sharp fluctuations. On the other hand, the wages of unskilled laborers, most of whom are from Southern and Eastern Europe, have steadily 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, p. 601. Immigration and Labor risen, while the pay of the engineers, who are mostly "Eng- lish-speaking, " has not come up to the 1880 level. A summary of the figures is given in Table 119 next below. 1 TABLE 119. DAILY WAGES OF EMPLOYEES IN STEEL COMPANY NO. I, l88o-I9O8. Laborers Other unskilled or semi-skilled All others Year Lowest Highest Lowest Highest Lowest Highest 1880 $I.IO $1.23 $1.05 $1-55 $1.60 $3.00 1885 I.OO 1.04 .68 1.48 1-54 342 1890 I.OO I.IO 75 1.25 1.26 2.70 1895 I.OO I.IO I.OO 1-35 145 3.00 I90O I.OO 1.20 1.15 1.50 1-55 3-65 1903 1.30 1.30 I.IO 2.IO 2.25 3-24 1908 1.38 145 1. 20 2.2O 2.25 3-60 As stated, the wage statistics of the Immigration Com- mission do not include rolling mills. From data published by the Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics it appears that the average wages of laborers in rolling mills increased, from 1884 to 1902, 50 per cent, as shown in Table 120: TABLE 120. COMPARATIVE WAGES OF LABORERS IN ROLLING MILLS, OHIO, 1884-1902.' Year Number reported Average daily wages 1884 1902 4,134 11,560 $1.05 1-58 An intelligent comparison of the wages of iron and steel workers at present and in the period preceding the immigra- 1 For details of the scale, see Appendix, Table XXV. Reports of the Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1885, p. 187; 1903, p. 429. The Iron and Steel Workers 399 tion of Southern and Eastern Europeans must take into consideration the revolution in technical methods which has occurred in the iron and steel industry during the interven- ing years. Prior to 1890, less than one half of all pig iron produced was made into steel; in 1909 all but 7 per cent of the pig iron reached the market as steel. Until 1890 the manufacture of iron other than steel exhibited a rapid growth; from 1880 to 1890 its output doubled. Since the latter year, however, it began to decline; from 5,000,000 tons in 1890 it dropped to about 1,800,000 tons in 1909. The majority of the men who had acquired skill in the iron mills found their occupations gone. Judged by the ton- nage of pig iron, the change must have affected as many iron workers as there had been employed in all the mills in 1887. At the same time the production of steel has in- creased sixfold since 1890.* This marvelous growth was made possible only by the adoption of new methods of steel-making. All these changes necessitated a thorough readjustment of the laboring forces. The transformation is well described in the following excerpts from Mr. Fitch's study of The Steel Workers: Through the revolutionary changes in method, machinery has dis- placed men to a remarkable extent. The proportion of skilled steel workers needed for the operation of a plant has decreased. At the same time, the large companies have so increased their capacity that they are employing more men than ever before, until to-day 60 per cent of the men employed in the steel industry are unskilled, and that 60 per cent is greater in numbers than the total working force twenty years ago. In no part of the steel manufacture have inventions and improvements had such an effect upon working conditions as in the rolling mills. Twenty years ago these mills were alive with men. To- day you will find large numbers of men in the guide and merchant mills, but at the blooming mills, the plate mills, and the structural and rail mills, you have to look sharply not to miss them entirely. These mills have become largely automatic. The two improvements that have contributed most to the cutting-down of the laboring force are the electric crane and the movable roll tables. . . . The electric crane 1 Computed from Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1911, p. 710. 400 Immigration and Labor operates over the whole length of the mill. Heavy material, that formerly a dozen moved with difficulty, is now picked up and moved easily by two men, working with a crane. Roll changing has become an easier and swifter process through the aid of the crane, and practically all the heavy lifting and carrying within the mill is thus accomplished by electric power. ... As in the case of blast furnace improvements, the effect has been to reduce the number of men employed. . . . This tendency to make processes automatic has resulted not only in a lessened cost with an increased tonnage, but it has also reinforced the control of the employers over their men. When the roll tables were introduced, they threw many roughers and catchers out of employment; beyond that, they lessened the importance to the employers of the men remaining. Men can learn to pull levers more easily than they can reach the skilled mastery of a position where the greatest dependence is on the man and the least on the machine. Accordingly this develop- ment has lessened the value to the employer of all the men in a plant, and at the same time has made the job of every man, skilled and unskilled, to a greater or less degree insecure. . . . The aim to-day seems to be to make the whole process as mechanical as possible. Fifteen or twenty years ago a large proportion of the employees in any steel plant were skilled men. The percentage of the highly skilled has steadily grown less, and the percentage of the unskilled has as steadily increased. The plants of the Carnegie Steel Company in Allegheny County employ in seasons of prosperity an aggregate of over 23,000 men. Of these about 17 per cent are skilled, 21 per cent semi-skilled, and 62 per cent unskilled, according to the classification employed by the company. 1 Taking the classification of Table 118 as a standard of comparison, we find that in 1884 more than one third of all men employed in rolling mills were skilled, whereas by 1907 their proportion had shrunk to 17 per cent. Had there been no expansion in the steel industry, more than one half of the skilled men employed in 1884 would have been reduced to the semi-skilled grade. But as the growth of production outran the progress of labor-saving methods and machinery, the skilled and semi-skilled men who were displaced from one department were absorbed in others, and still there were openings in the higher grades which were filled by promotion from the ranks of the older unskilled men. Of course the whole trend of the technical progress 1 Fitch t loc. tit., pp. 3-4, 55-56, 139-141- The Iron and Steel Workers 401 in the steel industry being toward elimination of human skill, the advancement of the minority to skilled and semi- skilled positions depended upon the employment of ever- increasing numbers of unskilled laborers. For reasons explained in Chapter VIII., English, Irish, and German immigration began to fall off at just about the time that the steel industry began to expand so rapidly and at the same time to introduce the automatic processes. This created a tre- mendous market for unskilled labor just as the field of immigration was shifting from Northwestern to Southeastern Europe. Slavs coming to America to perform the unskilled manual labor, and finding it in the steel industry, sent for their relatives and neighbors. These automatic accretions, through letters and friends returning to the old country and spreading the tidings of where work is to be had, are at once the most natural and most widespread factors in mobilizing an immigrant labor force. 1 Mr. Fitch is careful to note that "the newer immigrants are not working for less pay for a day's rough work than the races they replaced. The money wages paid for common labor in the Pittsburgh steel mills have been going up during the period referred to. " 2 It is clear that the recent immi- grants were not "brought" to this country to undercut the wages of the older employees. The Irish were -not driven out of the blast furnaces by a fresh immi- gration with lower standards of living [says Mr. Fitch further]; rather the conditions in the industry the twelve-hour day, the days and the weeks without a day of rest, the twenty-four-hour shift made the life intolerable. They could make as good a living working fewer hours a day, and only six days in the week, in other positions and in other industries. So the Irish worker went out and the Slav came in. 3 The effect of these readjustments on the distribution of the working force by race and occupation in the Pittsburgh district can be seen from Table 121. The average proportion of Southern and Eastern Euro- peans among the iron and steel workers, according to the investigations of the Immigration Commission, was 44.5 1 Fitch, loc. cit. t p. 143. Ibid., pp. 142-143. * Ibid., p. 146. 402 Immigration and Labor > 2 00 IO VO IO M I>.M OJ VO N IO W COOO 00 vq to 'S ^ Q\ ^ HH M O O to S 1 -juras N N co CONM " CO M 1 o M vO O N 0000 Tj- tt O 1 i 1 WIPE ^ O O ON cO d IO ^Ci COCO ON CO j> 1 t HV 8 o o o o o o 88 8888 O 8 8 1 4* M I >> O'OOI to co vqvq vq rt- t* t^ i^ q M 00 Jj '> t^-tO I>.N ON VO ON 80 ON M ^ - rt a a ?tuS t>. M M OO ONM CO M co t>- O to n- Is i s i O t*^ ON ON O to 00 U". la ~- w a 1 P * nPIS 8 OO M l^- M ON M IO MM t^. O 00 M H j IO * 00 O t>.vO CO CO CO 1 S IIV 8 M ^^J^^ 00 O co \O ci 3 II pm^san vS CO O ON M O oo w M OO CM C< ON N 10 M IO10VO ON M" O" M M O to N to vo_ H fi ] -juia S 00 t^ r* OO O *^ ON OO_ IO ^-ON M M 1 ci cT 1 u w * 'P'lII^S 00 oo CO f S5I^ to ^* CO o i saptriS nv CO tOM O M CO l>. O co c* O Q t> t^co oo rt-q o IO M" M" COM" M tQ OO 00 rf u K h 4J ro Ss W rt to to ^ i 1 1 i Race and i a-S c % Jllq J ! **^ w c is *J .,- 'J3 ^3 r> W {^ ? The Iron and Steel Workers 403 per cent in the East and 49.4 per cent in the Middle West. * The proportion of Slavs among the employees of the Car- negie Steel Company was accordingly above the average, which ought to emphasize the effects of immigration upon labor conditions in the iron and steel industry. The classification of employees by the Carnegie Steel Company is different from that followed in Table 34. a The Immigration Commission draws the dividing line between skilled and unskilled occupations at $1.45 a day, whereas the Carnegie Steel Company includes among the unskilled some occupations with a higher average wage. Moreover, the Immigration Commission has disregarded the semi- skilled class. According to the classification of the company, a little over one sixth of the "unskilled" employees in 1907 were English-speaking; of the semi-skilled two fifths were immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe ; among the skilled only one tenth were of the new immigrant races. The wages of each of these classes have been variously affected by the changes in machinery and methods. The wages of unskilled laborers, five sixths of whom are immi- grants from Southern and Eastern Europe, "have increased in the last few years. In 1892 they received 14 cents an hour at Homestead. In 1907-08 their pay was i6j^ cents an hour in the mills of the United States Steel Corporation an advance of 18 per cent over the hourly pay of 1892. This increase fell short by 4 per cent in keeping pace with the increased cost of necessities as indicated by the Bureau of Labor Bulletin. ... In May, 1910, announcement was made of a general increase in wages for all employees of the United States Steel Corporation. It was described as approximating 6 per cent over existing rates. Common laborers' pay was increased in the mills of the Corporation in the Pittsburg district from i6j^ cents an hour to 17^2 cents. This is an increase of 25 per cent over the 14-cent rate paid in 1892. " 1 Compiled from the Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, Table 23, pp. 34-35. 3 See Chapter VII. 404 Immigration and Labor At the opposite extreme are placed, by Mr. Fitch, "the men of highest skill, headed by the rollers and heaters, who have gangs working under them and are practically fore- men. These men represent not over 5 per cent of all employees." They are only a minority among the men classed by the company as skilled. Of the latter class, as stated, only one tenth are Southern and Eastern Europeans ; it is reasonably certain, however, that none of them are among "the men at the top." 1 These "aristocrats of labor" have had their earnings reduced since 1892. The cuts vary, according to position, from 5.39 per cent to 41.20 per cent. The intermediate 35 per cent are "the real steel workers. . . . They are men skilled in steel manufacture. . . . These men are individually essential to the industry.''' Their wages have remained in a "stationary condition, and if compared with the increased cost of living," exhibit a "downward tendency. " The proportion of Slavs among them can be estimated at 31 per cent. 2 This class holds in every respect an intermediate place; they have not fared as well relatively as the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe who form the bulk of the unskilled force ; still with one third among them drawn from the new immi- gration they have done better than the "aristocrats of labor" who do not come in contact with the new immigrants. The question arises, has not the competition of the Slav prevented the wages of the skilled men below the grade of foreman from rising apace with the cost of living? An 1 " I was unable to learn of any Slavs who had worked up to positions as rollers or heaters in the Pittsburgh mills," says Miss Byington in her study of Homestead. "This is due without doubt to the poorer industrial equipment of the immigrants, as well as to the unwillingness of the foremen to give the better positions to them.*' The Pittsburgh Survey, "Homestead," p. 148. "This ratio is obtained by computation from Table 121, allowing 5 per cent of all employees for the "men at the top" and placing all skilled and semi-skilled Southern and Eastern Europeans in the inter- mediate class. The Iron and Steel Workers 405 answer to this question may be found if the wages of the Pittsburgh skilled men are compared with those of the skilled men employed in the Southern mills where there is very little competition from new immigration. The boundary line drawn by the Immigration Commis- sion between skilled and unskilled workers $1.45 per day obviously does not fit the conditions in the Pitts- burgh district, where common laborers were paid 16.5 cents per hour previous to the recent raise. The recent report of the United States Bureau of Labor on labor conditions in the iron and steel industry divides all employees into three classes: (i) The lowest class, of the same grade as common laborers, whose earnings are less than 18 cents per hour; (2) the highest class, whose earnings are 25 cents and over per hour; and (3) the intermediate class, from 18 to 25 cents. The proportions of these classes in the total number of employees are: 49.7 per cent for the unskilled, 23.6 per cent for the skilled, and 26.7 per cent for the inter- mediate. 1 The latter class differs too widely from the intermediate class of the Pittsburgh Survey to be comparable with it. A fairly uniform basis, however, can be selected from the three classifications, as follows : (1) From the Pittsburgh Survey: all employees earning over $2.50 per day. 8 (2) From the report of the Bureau of Labor: all employees earning 25 cents and over, per hour. (3) From the report of the Immigration Commission: all male employees 18 years of age and over who earn $17.50 and over per week. The close similarity of the three groups appears from the comparative table on page 406. The proportion of Southern and Eastern Europeans in this grade was 16.1 per cent in the East, while in the South the aggregate of Southern and Eastern Europeans and 1 Summary of Wages and Hours of Labor from the Report on Conditions of Employment in the Iron and Steel Industry in the United States, p. 26. 3 Fitch, loc. tit., Table 8, p. 163. 406 Immigration and Labor negroes in the same grade was only 2.2 per cent. Thus in the East there were relatively about twice as many English- speaking employees receiving the highest rates as in the South, notwithstanding the much higher percentage of Southern and Eastern Europeans competing for the same positions in the East. TABLE 122. PER CENT OF SKILLED IRON AND STEEL WORKERS, BY LOCATION. Earnings Location Source 250. and over per hour $2.50 and over per day 117.50 and over per week Allegheny County Pittsburgh District Pittsburgh Survey U. S. Bureau of Labor 2d 06 28.17 East Immigration Com- mission 24..O South i Immigration ) Commission T 1 2fi I* 6 U. S. Bureau of ( Labor A^.U In order to assemble into one group all Southern mill- workers who perform the same grade of labor as the men employed in Eastern mills at $17.50 per week and upwards, we must descend one step and admit all Southern iron and steel workers earning $15 per week. As can be seen from Table 123 on page 407, two fifths (42 per cent) of the skilled iron and steel workers in the Southern mills earn only from $15 to $17.50 per week, whereas all employees of the same grade in the Eastern mills are paid not less than $17.50 per week. The differ- ence cannot be explained by the competition of Southern and Eastern Europeans or negroesfbecause the aggregate of those two racial groups among Southern iron and steel Corkers earning $15 and over does not exceed 1.8 per cent, The Iron and Steel Workers 407 whereas in the Eastern mills the Southern and Eastern Europeans constitute 16.1 per cent of all mill men earning $17.50 and upwards. TABLE 123. PER CENT OF SKILLED IRON AND STEEL WORKERS WITH SPECIFIED EARNINGS IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN MILLS. 1 District Earnings per week Per cent of all employees Per cent within the grade South ($15 to $17.50 J $17. 50 and over 9.8 13-6 4 2 58 East ( $15 and over $17. 50 and over 23-4 24. O 100 IOO There is considerable variation in the proportion of skilled and unskilled labor employed in various departments of iron and steel mills. This variation may affect geographi- cal comparisons which take no account of industrial speciali- zation. In order to eliminate this source of error the proportions of employees earning 25 cents per hour and over in productive occupations 2 are compared in Table 124 by departments. The figures show that, in all de- partments but one, a larger proportion of all ^employees are paid those rates in the Pittsburgh district than in the South. It may be assumed that the substitution of ma- chinery for human skill in the Pittsburgh district is as far advanced as in the Southern mills; the proportion of skilled 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, pp. 134, 355. 2 The following table is confined to "productive occupations" in order to exclude from the comparison, as far as possible, others than iron and steel workers. "The wages of workmen in mechanical trades are much more nearly standardized in the different districts than of the employees in the productive occupations, who are depend- ent almost entirely on the iron and steel industry for employment. " Summary of Wages and Hours of Labor in the Iron and Steel Industry, P- 33- 408 Immigration and Labor men in each department of the Pittsburgh mills may, there- fore, be accepted as the standard. It follows, accordingly, that in the Southern mills a fraction varying from one sixth to two thirds of all skilled men are paid less than 25 cents per hour, whereas in the Pittsburgh district all men of the same class are paid 25 cents and over. TABLE 124. PER CENT OF EMPLOYEES IN EACH DEPARTMENT EARNING 25 CENTS AND OVER PER HOUR, IN THE PITTSBURGH AND THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT. 1 Department Pittsburgh South Difference Per cent of all employees Per cent of Pittsburgh ratio Puddling mills . . . 70 47 38 36 II 6 58 3i 22 2O 65 22 2 12 -16 -16 -16 + 4 -4 -17 -34 -42 -44 22 -6 7 Blooming mills Bar mills Bessemer converters. . . . Miscellaneous mills Open-hearth furnaces . . . Blast furnaces The exception noted above applies to eleven miscellaneous rod mills in the United States employing a total of 333 men at 25 cents and over per hour, 2 i. e. t about J per cent of the total in productive occupations. The number is too small to affect the labor situation. 3 The preceding comparisons lead to the conclusion that the rates of wages of iron and steel workers vary inversely as the ratio of recent immigrants: The wages of the unskilled, the bulk of whom are Slavs, have kept pace with the cost of living; the wages of the "aristocrats of labor," none of whom are Slavs, have been reduced; the money wages of 1 Summary of Wages and Hours of Labor in the Iron and Steel Indus- try, p. 32. Ibid., pp. 16 and 25. a At the present writing the full report of the Bureau of Labor is still in press, while the published summary does not go into details of a local character. The Iron and Steel Workers 409 other skilled men, two thirds of whom are English-speaking, have remained stationary the wages of this class of em- ployees are lower in the South, where they meet no immi- grant competition, than in the Pittsburgh District. This correlation between the percentage of recent immi- grants and the variation of the rate of wages is not the manifestation of some innate racial predisposition to higher wages, but the working of the law of supply and demand in the labor market. The employment of a high percentage of immigrants in any section, industry, or occupation is an indication of an active demand for labor in excess of the native supply. Absence of immigrants is a sign of a dull market for labor. The wages of the unskilled Slav laborers have been raised because of the increasing demand for unskilled labor, not in the steel industry alone, but in other industries as well. The unskilled Slavs "can dig ditches or heave coal any day just as well as they can throw chains around piles of steel billets or shovel scrap into furnaces." On the contrary, the skilled English-speaking steel workers, though "individually essential to the industry . . . could not enter any other industry without a reduction in earn- ing power, because they are skilled only as steel work- ers. " Hence their acquiescence in a lowered rate of wages, whereas the unskilled Slav with his supposedly "lower standard of living" has been able to command as high a wage (measured by purchasing power) as his English- speaking predecessor. Long hours and Sunday work have not come with the new immigration. "Sunday work has been general in blast furnaces in this country from the beginning." 2 In rolling mills the practice has varied. There were some mills which ran on Sundays, as far back as the 8o's, before "the Slav invasion." The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers in the days of its power raised no objection to labor on Sunday. Its main concern was solely with wages, and it is a historical fact, worthy of notice, 1 Fitch, loc. cit. t p. 154. * Ibid., p. 168. 410 Immigration and Labor that the twelve-hour day was staunchly defended by the organized iron and steel workers when the steel manu- facturers, prompted by technical considerations, attempted to reduce the day to eight hours. The twelve-hour day was the outgrowth of metallurgical conditions in the old iron mills. In puddling one charge has to be melted, worked, and taken out before the next can go in. From the beginning of the industry in the Pittsburgh District, five charges or "heats" have been a day's work for a puddler. In the mills rolling sheet iron, too, the working day was determined by the number of heats. In the early days of the iron industry five heats took about twelve hours. This was the basis of the twelve-hour day with the two-shift system. With the progress of improvements in furnace construction and methods, it became possible to finish a turn of five heats in a shorter time and the actual working day gradually shrank to one of ten hours and even less. As a result of the shortened time, there came to be periods of idleness between shifts. In a sheet mill this interim between shifts was especially objectionable, for sheet iron is rolled so thin that good results can be obtained only when the rolls are expanded by the heat. The rolls are so shaped that when cold they cannot turn out a sheet of uniform thickness ; consequently after a period of idleness hot scrap is sent through them until they reach the correct expansion. To avoid these periods of idleness, the manufacturers, in the 8o's, sought to introduce an eight-hour day. This was for a long time resisted by the union, which stood firmly for the twelve-hour shift. The reason for this unusual attitude was that the skilled men who belonged to the union were paid at piece rates and apprehended a loss of a part of their earnings in case they might not be able to turn out five heats in eight hours. The question was discussed at several national conventions. Some of the officers took the ground that a reduction of hours was desirable even if it originally involved a loss of earnings to individuals. The introduc- tion of a three-shift system would create a demand for half The Iron and Steel Workers 411 as many more skilled men as were employed at the time and would eventually enable the members of the union to win an increase in piece rates. But the rank and file of the membership could not see so far ahead and forced the officers to insist upon the twelve-hour day. Some lodges which had accepted the eight-hour shift were suspended. One of the presidents of the union who supported the manu- facturers in their effort to introduce the eight-hour day was denounced by the membership as a traitor to the cause of labor. The controversy lasted several years in the 8o's, when the iron and steel workers were all of the English- speaking races. Later the union relaxed its rule against the eight-hour system, but the manufacturers had mean- while readjusted themselves to the old twelve-hour shift. 1 This episode characterizes the spirit of the Amalgamated Association. The Association was originally organized as a union of skilled iron workers and was very strong in the iron industry. But with the decline of the latter the power of the organiza- tion began to wane. It never gained strength in the steel mills. Out of 3800 men at Homestead when the strike began in 1892, only 752 were members in good standing of the Amalgamated Association. "The Association has always been an organization of skilled workers and has centered its efforts on securing better conditions for that class of labor alone, " says Mr. Fitch. " It was only in 1889 that the constitution permitted the admission of all men, except, however, common laborers." 2 Nevertheless, when the Amalgamated Association struck in 1892, the common laborers, the despised Hungarians and Slavs, stood by it. 3 The defeat of the Homestead strike broke the organization. It had been rapidly increas- 1 See Fitch, loc. cit. t pp. 90-97. * Ibid . pp. 97, 98. * "A great cause was in the balance, and in their humble way the army of the poor Hungarians and Slavs understood it, " says a trade- union historian of the Homestead strike. Myron R. Stowell: Fort Prick, or the Siege of Homestead, p. 86, 412 Immigration and Labor ing its membership since 1885, when it had numbered only 5700, to the year preceding the great strike, when it reported to the national convention a membership of 24,000, organized in 290 lodges. During the year following the strike, it lost about one half of that number. There were slight increases at times in later years; since 1903, however, it has been gradually declining, until it had, in 1910, only 103 lodges with a little over 8000 members. x This is less than 5 per cent of the total number of iron and steel workers in the United States. 2 The strength of the organization of the iron and steel workers in the 8o's lay in their special skill. Though a minority of the force, they were indispensable to the indus- try, because they could not be replaced. It is for this very reason that they barred common laborers from their organi- zation: they did not want to become involved in con- troversies over the wages of day laborers who could easily be replaced by others. But when improved machinery displaced the skill of the mechanic the organization of the skilled iron and steel workers lost its foothold. To-day, says Mr. Fitch every man is in training for the next position above. If all of the rollers in the Homestead plant were to strike to-morrow the work would go on, and only temporary inconvenience, if any, would be suffered. There would simply be a step up along the line: the tableman would take the rolls, the hooker would manipulate the tables, perhaps one of the shearmen's helpers would take the hooker's position, and some- where, away down the line, an unskilled yard laborer would be taken to fill the vacancy in the lowest position involving skill. The course would vary in the different styles of mills, as the positions vary in number and character, but the operating principle is everywhere the same. In the open hearth department the line of promotion runs through common labor, metal wheelers, stock handlers, cinder-pit man, second helper, and first helper to melter foreman. In this way the companies develop and train their own men. . . . Thus the working 1 Fitch, loc. cit., p. 297. 3 In May, 1910, there were 172,706 workers employed in the steel mills of the United States. Summary of Wages and Hours of Labor in the Iron and Steel Industry, p. 17. The Iron and Steel Workers 413 force is pyramided and is held together by the ambition of the men lower down; even a serious break in the ranks adjusts itself all but automatically. x In 1909, an attempt was made by "the men lower down" to unite all mill workers in a common demand for better terms of employment. In the McKees Rocks strike the leaders and the rank and file were mostly recent immigrants. Of this strike Mr. Fitch has the following to say : In the summer of 1909 there was a demonstration of the spirit of immigrant workmen that opened the eyes of the public to qualities heretofore unknown. For many weeks at McKees Rocks they persisted in their strike against the Pressed Steel Car Company. It had been thought that the Slavs were too sluggish to resist their employers, and unable to organize along industrial lines. It was proved in this conflict that neither theory was correct. 3 'Fitch, loc. cit., pp. 141, 142. Ibid., pp. 237, 238. CHAPTER XXI THE COAL MINERS THE Immigration Commission considered the coal- mining industry as typical of the conditions created by immigration, and gave it accordingly the most promi- nent place in its report. Two volumes are devoted to bituminous coal, and a portion of a third to anthracite. The findings of the Commission may be briefly summed up as follows : the English-speaking mine workers do not desire V to associate with the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, consequently those immigrants are undesirable. There are in the reports some valuable data on the economic side of the question, but they have had no part in shaping the conclusions 6f"the Commission. It views the con- ditions in the coal-mining industry with the eyes of the English-speaking trade-union officials, who apprehend in v the multitudes of Slav and Italian mine workers a growing menace to their influence in the organization. To follow the Commission's summary historical review of the coal-mining industry, the conflict between the English- speaking and non-English-speaking races began in the &o&' when a series of unsuccessful strikes forced "a greater or less number of natives, English, Irish, Scotch, and Germans," to leave "Pennsylvania in search of better working con- ditions in the Middle West or the localities in the Southwest or West to which the recent immigrants had not penetrated in important numbers. " The same situation was repeated in the ^30*5 in West Virginia. The "constantly growing number of Southern and Eastern Europeans . . . com- pletely inundated the older employees," with the result 414 The Coal Miners 415 that many of them "moved westward in search of better working conditions," and "the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe were left in undisputed control of the situation." In their new retreat the English-speaking /? Di- mmers remained undisturbed until the first decade of theT present century, when the advancing columns of the South- ern and Eastern Europeans reached them there. "As the pressure, resulting from the increase in numbers of the recent immigrants has become stronger . . . the older immigrants and natives," who were unable to change their occupation, moved " from localities and Amines where the competition of the Southern and Eastern European has been most strongly felt to other localities in the Middle West or Southwest." But soon the first detachments of the Southern and Eastern Europeans made their appearance in the Southwestern fields and forced the "Americans and individual members of the English, Irish, Scotch, and Welsh races" to retreat to New Mexico and Colorado. The narrative concludes with the following statement, which sounds the keynote, as it were, of the whole report : From the standpoint of the natives and the older immigrant employees, it therefore seems clearly apparent that the competition of recent immi- grants has caused a gradual displacement, commencing in Pennsylvania '^ and extending westward, until at the present time the representatives of the pioneer employees in the bituminous mining industry are making their last stand in the Southwest, and especially in Kansas, where they are gradually being weakened and are withdrawing to the newly opened fields of the West, to which the recent immigrant has not come in jm- portant numbers. Along with this displacement of the older employees in the different coal-producing areas has proceeded the elimination of a correspondingly large proportion from the industry and the development of such working and Hying conditions that the sons of natives and the second generation of immigrant races have only to a very small extent consented to enter the industry. 1 The story of the pioneers "making their last stand" against the invaders has a pathetic sound uncommon in 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, p. 536. PRODUCTION OF COAL IN STATES WITH AN ANNUAL 1880 \20ro39 (i unit = 1 ,000,000 tons) 416 OUTPUT OF NOT LESS THAN I.OOO.OOO TONS. IQOO .^\ . . J ^ ^K- ; / ^'^.^ ^-.yyyo : . :: . : }_ __ ' v WIS. ^ lation of the "representative community" has grown from 1295 in 1890 to 2635 in 1900 and to 4592 in 1910. Two_ 'thirds of this increase were due to immigration, not counting \the native-born children of immigrants. 7 And it is ob- 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, p. 335. The quotatio* relates to Pennsylvania, but the same is true of the United States in general. a The description of that community contains nothing of a confidential nature that would warrant the withholding of its name from the public in an official report. Moreover, the disguise is too thin to be effective: there is only one incorporated place in the State of Pennsylvania that had a population of 2635 in 1900 (XIII. Census: Population, vol. in' P- 558). 3 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 563. See also p -^- \M>id., P . 563. Ibid., p. 532. 6 ^d., p. 563. 7 In 1900 the total number of foreign-born in the borough was 587; in 1908 it was estimated at 1900. Ibid., p. 533. The Coal Miners 423 viously ^^^aSE^S^^LS^^^^-^f-^ borough that has made room for more professional and business men. Speaking generally, the "employees displaced as miners " could not "have gone into manufacturing plants and shops . . . into street railways and trolley service, or into business for themselves," 1 had not the recent immigrants furnished the labor to do the disagreeable and dangerous work in the manufacturing plants and mines and the passengers to ride on the trolley cars. "The displaced employees did not better their economic condition," however, in the Middle West says the Immi- gration Commission. The "subsequent history of the old employees" in that section is recited as follows: No extensive data are available as to the subsequent history of the pioneer miners in the Middle West who were displaced by the recent immigrant. It is well known, and has already been pointed out, that many of them advanced in the industrial scale, becoming foremen and attaining other responsible positions. It has also been mentioned that a large number abandoned the occupation of miner for positions as day or shift men. Many also migrated and located in other sections of the Middle West where hand mining continued to be followed, and many also moved to other coal-fields, principally to Kansas and Oklahoma, in the Southwest. The reports from several communities also show that many of the former miners who left the industry entirely . . . entered mercantile, clerical, mechanical, and other lines of work. The reports further unite in the statement, however, that the displaced employees did not better their economic condition. 3 There are irreconcilable contradictions in this "history." C*^ 1 It seems inconceivable that those of the "displaced" pick miners who "advanced in the industrial scale, becoming foremen and attaining other .responsible positions" (there are alleged to have been "many of them"), "did not better ^- their economic condition." It is contrary to common experience that the "displaced" miners "who left the in- dustry" to enter mercantile or mechanical lines of work should not be earning more as business men or mechanics 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 426. Ibid., p. 668. 424 Immigration and Labor than they had been earning with pick and shovel inside of a coal mine. The "data . . . as to the subsequent history of the pioneer miners" are admittedly scarce. The loose "statement" of the anonymous "reports" is clearly sheer hearsay, which deserves no place in an official report. The Immigration Commission attaches undue importance to the social prejudice against "a Hunkey's job," which it considers "one of the strongest forces toward the displace- ment of the older employees either from the industry or .v'from certain occupations within the industry." 1 The Commission mistakes here cause for effect. The contempt for " a Hunkey's job " did not exist so long as the bulk of the English-speaking operatives were employed on that grade of work. Yet, then as now, the "tendency" on the part of the native American "to abandon the occupation of coal digging and to enter the better class of positions about the mines" must have been "decidedly marked," 2 when- ever an opportunity presented itself. ) We further learn that^ "the exodus of former operatives from the industry" was stimulated by "the fact that there were opportunities to secure work whichjpaid as well or better than mining, that this worlTwas often more agreeable and less dangerous." 3 It was only after their~elevation (or "displacement," as the Commission would have it) from the ranks of coal diggers to the more exalted station of mine bosses and street car conductors that they began to look *down upon those who had succeeded them. This caste feeling is far too general in all climes and conditions of life to be classed ne unsuccessful strike. It is only since the~a3vent~ of the Southern and Eastern Europeans that the union has taken a firm hold of the industry. Dr. Roberts, reviewing the history of unionism in the anthracite coal industry, says : John Graham Brooks, when he studied the Lattimer riots of 1897, found on the Hazleton Mountain over a dozen nationalities. He ex- pressed the conviction that it was a hopeless task to attempt to form them into a labor organization. Paul de Rousiers, in his essay on Les Tentatives de Monopolisation de I' Anthracite, expressed a similar 1 Roberts, loc. cit., p. 184. 456 Immigration and Labor opinion. He compared the present personnel of anthracite employees, "largely composed of Polanders, Hungarians, and Lithuanians, who are turbulent and incapable of being advantageously formed into an association," with the Americans, Germans, and English of 1868, who so successfully organized the Workingmen's Benevolent Association, and believed they could not be successfully organized into a labor organization. Both eminent men have proved to be false prophets. Thestanchest members of the union are the Slavs, and the organizers of the~United Mine Workers of America have successfully overcome racial differences, national antipathies and industrial prejudices, and formed into one body the fifteen or sixteen nationalities now constituting the anthracite mining communities. 1 The opinions of those "false prophets" were still reit- erated after the strikes of 1900 and 1902 by labor men, who "had learned nothing and forgotten nothing," and were embodied by the Immigration Commission in its report. These foreigners, [says Dr. Roberts elsewhere] have proved capable of forming labor organizations which are more compact and united than any which ever existed among the various English-speaking nationalities, who first constituted these communities. It is conceded by men intimate with the situation throughout the coal fields during the last strike, that its universality was more due to the Slav than to any other nationality. There would have been in all probability a break in the ranks in Schuylkill County had it not been for the firm and uncompromising stand of the Slavs in favor of the strike. They have been trained to obedience, and when they organize they move with a unanimity that is very seldom seen among nations who pride themselves on personal liberty and free discussion. 3 These lines were written by Dr. Roberts previous to the strike of 1902. The significance of the latter was that the other side to the controversy was a trust which was (and is) in complete control of the whole anthracite coal industry. The outcome of the contest has been the creation of a demo- cratic organization of all mine workers to which the trust cannot deny recognition, with a machinery for fixing wages and other terms of employment, as well as for the settlement of disputes. After twenty years of immigration from Southern and 1 Roberts, loc. ciL, pp. 196-197. Ibid., pp. 171-172. The Coal Miners 457 Eastern Europe, the coal miners are more strongly organized than they had ever been before the English-speaking mine workers relinquished the lower grades of work to the recent immigrants; the hours of labor have been reduced, wages have risen, and the majority of the older employees have advanced on the scale of occupations. On the other hand, a "small part [of the 'pioneer em- ployees and their descendants'] consisting of the inert, unambitious, thriftless element, have remained on the lower level of the scale of occupations where they are in open com- petition with the majority of the races of recent immigra- tion in comparison with whom they are generally considered less efficient." 1 It is said in their behalf that their anxiety to be "removed from contact and competition with the immigrant" has "forced" them "into day or shift work^at a lower rate of pay than in digging coal." 2 In order to escape the ruinous competition of the recent immigrant, the English-speaking miner, it would seem, is willing to accept lower wages than the immigrant. It may be ques- tioned whether this small residue of English-speaking mine workers who are "considered less efficient" than the South- ern and Eastern Europeans could have succeeded better in competition with native or English-speaking miners, had there been no immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. Probably the reference to "competition with the immigrant" is merely a pleonasm, the idea being that the English-speaking miner is willing to make a financial sacrifice in order to be "removed from contact with the immigrant." The objection to the recent immigrant is accordingly in- spired by pure and simple race prejudice. This is, how- ever, beside the question, so long as it is maintained that immigration should be treated "upon economic or business considerations. ' ' 3 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, pp. 536-537. 2 Ibid., vol. 6, pp. 666-667; vol. 7, p. 222. 3 Recommendations of the Immigration Commission. CHAPTER XXII WORK ACCIDENTS greatest of all the dangers of the new immigration, which have been discovered by the investigation of the Immigration Commission, is that their employment in mines and manufactures jeopardizes the lives of American wage-earners. The Commission has devoted to the sub- ject a special chapter in its report on bituminous coal mines. 1 Its conclusions are summarized by Professors Jenks and Lauck as follows 2 : The lack of industrial training and experience of the recent im- migrant before coming to the United States, together with his illit- eracy and inability to speak English, has had the effect of exposing the original employees to unsafe and unsanitary working conditions, or has 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, chapter viii., pp. 209-241; also, pp. 491-492, 543, 651-652; vol. 7, pp. 68-69. a The Commission is, of course, not responsible officially for the statement of those authors. But the book is very largely a verbatim transcript of the most essential portions of the Commission's voluminous report. On the subject of accidents, the report of the Commission says in Volume 6: "The responsibility for accidents rests in most cases with the men injured . . . they know little or nothing of rock formations, of fire damp, of the properties of coal dust, and of the handling of explosives matters about which every coal miner should be thoroughly informed. To determine whether a piece of slate or -roof is or is not likely to fall often requires a considerable degree of experience, and the majority of the Slavs, Magyars, and Italians have not this experience. Another element of danger is contributed by the fact that few of the recent immigrants speak or understand English, while almost none are able to read or write the language. It is probable that the instructions of the mine bosses and inspectors are, because of this fact, frequently 458 Work Accidents 459 led to the imposition of conditions of employment which the native American or older immigrant employees have considered unsatisfactory and in some cases unbearable. When the older employees have found dangerous and unhealthy conditions prevailing in the mines and manu- facturing establishments and have protested, the recent immigrant employees^ usually through ignorance of mining or other working methods, have manifested a willingness to accept the alleged unsatisfactory conditions. In a large number of cases, the lack of training and experience of the Southern and Eastern European affects only his own safety. On the other hand, his ignorant acquiescence in dangerous and unsanitary work- ing conditions may make the continuance of such conditions possible and become a menace to a part or to the whole of an operating force of an industrial establishment. In mining, the presence of an untrained employee may constitute an element of danger to the entire body of workmen. There seems to be a direct causal relation between the extensive employment of recent immigrants in American mines and the extraordinary increase within recent years in the number of mining accidents. // is an undisputed fact that the greatest number of accidents in bituminous coal mines arise from two causes: (i) the recklessness, and (2) the ignorance and inexperience, of employees. When the lack of training of the recent immigrant abroad is considered in connection with the fact that he becomes a workman in the mines immediately upon his arrival in this country, and when it is recalled that a large proportion of the new arrivals are not only illiterate and unable to read any precautionary notices posted in the mines, but also unable to speak English and consequently without ability to comprehend instructions intelligently, the inference is plain that the employment of recent immi- niisunderstood. An inspector, for example, tells an immigrant miner, in English of course, that his roof needs propping. The miner seems to understand, but does not, and a fall results. In some mines printed signs are used to indicate the presence of gas or other peril. These are quite unintelligible to most of the foreigners, because, through lack of training, they are unable to recognize the presence of danger, and further, because of their keenness for earning money, the immigrants are often willing to work in places where more experienced or more intelligent men would refuse to work. For the same reasons they will frequently be satisfied with and accept mine equipment too defective for safety. . . . The ignorance and inexperience of the workmen of the races of recent immigration employed in mines are responsible in a large measure for the high death rate reported. Owing to the large number of factors affecting the situation, no hard and fast conclusion can be drawn, but the inference from the data available clearly warrants the assertion that the employment of immigrant mine workers has a direct bearing upon mining casualties." (pp. 232-233, 241.) 460 Immigration and Labor grants has caused a deterioration in working conditions. No complete statistics have been compiled as to the connection between accidents and races employed, but the figures available clearly indicate the con- clusion that there has been a direct relation between the employment of untrained foreigners and the prevalence of mining casualties. 1 The two causes from which, according to this explanation, the greatest number of accidents arise, are but the familiar defenses in an employer's liability case under the common law: (i) negligence of the injured employee or of a fellow- servant, (2) assumption of risk by the injured employee. The Immigration Commission rests its conclusions on the opinions of State mining officials and experts of the Federal Government, seemingly supported by an array of statistical figures. An examination of these authorities, however, will show that they have merely accepted the mine operator's point of view without turning their atten- tion to the technical and the economic side of coal mining in the United States. Miss Eastman, in her study of work accidents for the Pittsburgh Survey, has carefully scrutinized the sources of the accepted explanation of the causes of work accidents. In vivid conversational style she thus characterizes the typical attitude "of those best informed upon the subject" 3 : "So you have come to Pittsburgh to study accidents, have you?" says the superintendent, or the claim agent, or the general manager, as the case may be. "Well, I 've been in this business fifteen years and I can tell you one thing right now, p5 per cent of our accidents are due to the carelessness of the man who gets hurt. Why, you simply would n't believe the things they '11 do. For instance, I remember a man," and he goes on to relate the most telling incident he knows to prove his assertion. This is the almost invariable reaction of the Pittsburgh employer and his representatives to a query about industrial accidents. And the statements of such men are the chief source of effective public opinion on the subject in Pittsburgh.* 1 Jenks and Lauck, loc. cit., pp. 189-190. * Phrase used by the Immigration Commission (Reports, vol. 6, p. 216). 3 Crystal Eastman: Work-Accidents and the Law, p. 84. Work Accidents 461 The returns of the mine inspectors on the causes of acci- dents are based upon the results of the coroners' inquests. Miss Eastman questions the reliability of the evidence secured at the inquests : Foremen and fire bosses are required at once to inspect a room where an accident has occurred, and, if death results, one of them is always summoned to the inquest. He almost invariably testifies, "I found plenty of posts in the room." Since it is his business by law to see that there are plenty of posts in the room, and since the inquest is very casual, unimpressive, he could hardly be expected to testify otherwise. Private conversation with miners sometimes brings other information to light. ... An old Scotch miner of sixty, said . . . that he "had often seen the foreman and boss hurry to a room where an accident had happened and fill it with posts, so that when the inspector arrived there would be plenty of posts on hand." 1 The coroners' records were, as a rule, meager, sometimes illegible, and almost never clear and satisfactory in detail. The testimony, moreover, has a tendency to lean to one side. The witnesses are employees of the company, including almost always the superior of the man killed. It is to his interest to clear him- self of all implications; second, to clear his employer. The easiest and safest way of accomplishing these ends is to blame the dead man.* Thus, when we read in the reports of the Pennsylvania Department of Mines for 1907 that "a careful examination of the reports shows that 332 accidents, or 41.19 per cent, were due to the carelessness of the victim," 3 this statement means no more than that the reports which reached the department "blamed the dead man" in two cases out of every five. Of course, 41.19 per cent is still short of a majority, but it is turned into a majority of 62.29 per cent by omitting "the 273 fatalities of the Naomi and Darr mines, which were caused by the carelessness of other persons. ' ' 4 These undefined ' ' other persons ' ' include ' ' offi- cials in direct charge of the mines." The propriety of omitting two great mine disasters, which resulted in the 1 Crystal Eastman: Work- Accidents and the Law, p. 39. a Ibid., p. 85. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 216. * Ibid., p. 216. (Quoted from the report of the Pennsylvania Bureau of Mines.) 462 Immigration and Labor loss of 273 lives through the carelessness of " other persons," is open to question. 1 Yet that statement of the Pennsyl- vania report is the only direct statistical evidence in support of the Commission's conclusion ''that the responsibility for a majority of the accidents in coal mines rests with the men injured. This being the case" continues the Com- mission "it is evident that an inquiry as to the responsi- bility of a given race for accidents may perhaps best be answered by showing the extent to which its numbers are sufferers from accidents.*' 2 Disinterested mining experts, however, do not accept the apologetic theory of the mine operators as an "undisputed fact." At the summer meeting of the Mining Institute of America, held in 1910, shortly after the Cherry Mine holo- caust, the causes of mine fires were discussed in a paper, from which the following is quoted : In looking over the accounts of some of the mine fires which have startled the general public more than others, I was forcibly struck with three of them (Avondale, Hill Farm, and Cherry), especially in the general aspect at least of the similarity of their cause and effect, and of the cycle of years between each. The Avondale Mine was a single- shaft opening. The structural material used in the shaft lining, parti- tions, derrick, and breaker, was composed of wood. The fire originated at the bottom of the shaft, caused by the carelessness of the furnace man in lighting the furnace fire, thereby setting fire to the wooden partition, etc. This fire occurred in the month of September, 1869, and in it 109 lives were lost. As you remember, no adequate means were at hand with which to extinguish the fire. . . . The Cherry Mine'disaster . . . originated at the No. 2 seam landing of the escapement shaft and was 1 Dr. John Randolph Haynes, Special Commissioner on Mining Accidents of the State of California, in a paper read at the last annual meeting of the American Association for Labor Legislation, at Washing- ton, D. C, questioned the independence of State mining inspectors: " They do not wish to lose their positions, which they are very likely to do if they annoy the owners of coal mines, who very commonly own the railroads which carry the coal, and enjoy intimate relations with banks and other corporations that exercise quiet but effective power in State politics." "A Federal Mining Commission," American Labor Legislation Review, vol. ii, No. I, p. 145. * Ibid., p. 233. Work Accidents 463 caused by the ignition of hay from the flame of a crude, improvised, unpro- tected illuminating contrivance. The flame from the hay was commu- nicated to the overabundance of wood supporting material at the landing, and adding thereto the inadequate means available to successfully deal with afire of such magnitude, with the ill-judged actions of the inexperi- enced men at the bottom, the trap was complete and the men caught therein, so we have now to record the greatest and most disastrous mine fire in the history of the coal-mining industry of this country, so far as the loss of life is concerned. Two hundred and sixty -eight lives were lost in the Cherry Mine disaster. It has always appeared to me that the causes of mine fires were so apparent to the thoughtful and intelligent mining men that their occur- rence and their ill effects were unnecessary. . . . The prevention of mine fires lies in the removal of the causes, which are well known, and the knowledge of means and methods to be employed for their elimination, being within the range and scope of the ability of the ordinary mine official, the wonder is that they do happen. To secure freedom from mine fires I believe lies almost entirely within the intelligently directed administrative powers of the mine management, and in my opinion if the mine officials are careful, alert, and capable, immunity from them can be secured. . . . Every coal mine should consist of two separate openings and one of them should be used exclusively for an escapement. . . . The escape- ment shaft, if over one hundred feet in depth, should be equipped with safe and efficient hoisting apparatus. The structure at the hoisting shaft should be built of steel, and the engine and power house should be built of concrete, brick, or masonry; the shaft linings to be of con- crete, and the shaft bottoms, if needing supports for the roof, should be of steel I beams, concrete, or brickwork; doors between main shaft and escapement shaft should be so located as to be easily accessible to the workmen from all parts of the mine by convenient traveling ways, other than those which lead directly to the bottom of the hoisting shaft; mule stables, if not entirely prohibited in the mines, should be built of incombustible material and illuminated with protected incandescent electric lights; all oil, electric, and gasoline pump houses should be kept free from combustible material, and be built of concrete, brickwork, or masonry. When the main workings pf a mine have advanced five thousand feet in length and the remaining extent of the property and the other conditions warrant it, an auxiliary escapement opening should be provided and equipped with efficient and necessary machinery; a water system under sufficient pressure . . . should be installed at all important mines, . . . and all parts and connections kept in first-class condition and ready for use at all times; all electric cables or wires, etc., should be well supported and insulated, and not allowed to come in contact with 464 Immigration and Labor combustible material. . . . A telephone system should be provided at important mines so that communication can be had between persons outside, and all important stations inside of them; refuge chambers, efficiently constructed and equipped and conveniently located, should be provided in all large and dangerous mines. Mines should be provided with a powerful reversible fan, and it should be placed on a separate shaft, cased in steel, and fitted with relief doors. 1 These details have been quoted in order to show that effective prevention of accidents in mines presupposes a care- fully planned equipment involving considerable expense. A separate roadway for miners means additional tunneling work. Two separate openings for every coal mine cost twice as much as one. Refuge chambers require additional excavation and construction work. Concrete or brick is more expensive than wood, which is generally used as structural material in coal mines. A powerful reversible fan placed on a separate shaft cased in steel is another item of expense ; so is a water system under sufficient pressure, a telephone system, etc. All this is well known to mine superintendents, "but they are pressed for dividends by the presidents and their companies; the presidents are not heartless, but they are pressed for dividends by their directors who . . . are interested in the mines only* as a matter of profit." 2 The dilemma of the mine superintendent was set forth in a paper on "Mine Accident Prevention," which was recently read before the Alabama Coal Operators' Associa- tion by Mr. J. J. Rutledge, a geologist and mining engineer of many years' experience, who has made his way from the bottom up, beginning as assistant mine foreman and advan- cing to the positions of mine manager and superintendent. He has visited many of the important coal mines in this country, and has been brought into close personal contact with mine foremen and superintendents. He is of the opinion that "the person who is the greatest factor in the pre- '"Mine Fires," by Thomas K. Adams. Mines and Minerals, De- cember, 1910. a Haynes, loc. cit., p. 145. Work Accidents 465 vention of mine accidents is the mine foreman or manager. . . . He should never cancel any requisition for supplies that are absolutely required. Perhaps the greatest abuse of this sort is the cancellation of supplies which are required to make ventilation more effective." But it is not unusual that the foreman or manager "is handicapped or hindered in his work by the failure to receive proper supplies or equip- ment from his superiors." That he might "be encouraged to demand the same and . . . be insured against possible loss of employment by reason of his making such a demand . . . the law should back him up in making such demands." 1 It is an undisputed fact that poor and defective methods of ventilation largely increase the danger of gas explosion : "An adequate air supply is not only required as a safeguard against the accumulation of dangerous gases, but is pre- requisite to the maintenance of the health of miners and animals employed underground." 2 But the mine manager who is not "insured against pos- sible loss of employment" will take his chances and cancel requisitions for "supplies that are absolutely required." These conditions naturally breed a spirit of carelessness among mine officials, which is, according to expfert opinion, "first among the causes of the high fatality rate in Ameri- can mines." Such was the conclusion reached by three European government experts, among them the Belgian Inspector-General of Mines, who made an examination of American mines upon the invitation of the United States Government. By way of illustration, one of these experts related the following incident: While passing through a mine in West Virginia with a party carrying both naked and safety lamps, he lifted his lamp toward the roof to test for gas and was surprised to find it present in very dangerous quantities. Turning to the mine superintendent, he remarked, " You should not 1 J. J. Rutledge: " Mine Accident Prevention." Mines and Minerals, December, 1910. * F. L. Hoffman: "Fatal Accidents in Coal Mines." Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor, No. 90, p. 471. 466 Immigration and Labor allow naked lamps to be used in this mine." "Oh," replied the super- intendent, easily, "we are installing a ventilating system that in a few months will rid the mine entirely of gas and render the use of safety lamps unnecessary." "Before that time arrives," protested the Euro- pean expert, "your mine will be blown up." And this is precisely what happened. The naked lamps were not excluded, the mine was blown up a few weeks later, and hundreds of miners lost their lives. ... No European mining superintendent would dream of taking such chances as he foolishly took at the cost of so many lives; and, if he were so inclined, the government inspector would not permit him to do so. 1 Mine explosions and mine fires impress the imagination by the appalling destruction of lives in a single accident. A great many more lives, however, are sacrificed under ordinary circumstances in every-day accidents, which find their way only into the statistical reports of State mine inspectors, being too common to be noticed by the news- papers. Every advance in mining engineering within recent years has had the effect of increasing the risks of the miner in the United States. One of the original dangers in underground coal mines is from falls of roof, which are the result, at least in part, of insufficient timbering. This risk has been considerably increased by the use of high explosives. 2 With the installation of improved mining machinery, ex- posure to unguarded machines has been added to other perils of mining. 3 Electrocution threatens the miner as a result of the application of electricity to mining. The chief inspector of coal mines for Pennsylvania gave warning of this danger in his report for 1901 : Electricity in various forms has been the cause of many of the deaths in soft coal mines, either from the men coming in contact with the electric trolley wire, or with the electric wire that carries the power to the electric cutting machines. In my opinion, separate travelling ways should be provided for the workman, when the haulage is done by electricity.* 'Haynes, loc. cit., p. 143. * Eastman, loc. cit., pp. 38-39. Hoffman, loc. cit., pp. 476-477- 4 Ibid., pp. 478-479. Work Accidents 467 When this recommendation was adopted in one Colorado mine ten years later, the Engineering and Mining Journal found the fact of sufficient interest as news to print the following letter from a correspondent: This mine has introduced a decided novelty in the form of a separate roadway for the miners to enter and leave the workings, thus doing away with the necessity of their travelling along the haulage-ways, and pro- viding an additional avenue of escape. in time of danger. 1 The displacement of the mule by the cable car or electric motor has been the source of a new danger to the life of the miner. Many miners are killed by the running trains of coal. This is, of course, clearly the result of their own negligence: why do they travel in the haulage- way? The fact is, however, that the man-entry and track are dark from beginning to end and low, so that one would have to travel in a stooping position all the way. The track is cov- ered with loose slate and big chunks of coal. Therefore the miners prefer the haulage entry, where there are occasional lights, a smooth path to walk, and a higher roof. 2 Most of these risks are humanly preventable, 3 and their continuance is due to economic conditions beyond the control of the mine worker, even with a perfect command of English. The economic cause of the high rate of fatalities in American coal mines was squarely stated by Dr. J. A. Holmes, Director of the Bureau of Mines, in an address delivered at the annual meeting of the National Civic Federation in New York, November 23, 1909: There can be no permanent industry without reasonable profits. It is unjust and irrational that in this great and essential branch of industry reasonable profits or even the payment of operating expenses should be dependent upon met'wds involving unnecessary sacrifice of human life. . . . Ruinous competition exists not only between the operators in the same fields, but between the operators of one field as against those in another field or in another state where different mining laws and regulations are in force. This competition is ... forcing 1 The Engineering and Mining Journal, January 14, 1911, p. 135. 2 Eastman, loc. tit., pp. 38-39. a Ibid., p. 46. 468 Immigration and Labor even the larger operator to mine coal under conditions which he cannot approve, but from which he finds no escape. . . . Each must live (or succumb) by underbidding the other, which he can do only through following the wasteful and unsafe mining methods which prevail in this country to-day in spite of the desire of every operator, to improve them. The American mine owner is as humane as the mine owner of any other country, and he would like to follow every practice and use every appliance for safety to be found in Great Britain, or France, or Belgium, or Germany, or elsewhere, but he pays his miners higher wages and, at the same time, receives for his coal at the mine half the price received for similar coal by the operator in those countries. . . . The ruinous competitive system upon which coal mining in the United States is based at the present time should be changed and the price paid for coal at the mines should be such as will permit and secure safe and efficient mining mining unaccompanied by either this large loss of life or waste of resources, mining which can have due regard not only to the safety, but also to the health and comfort of the men who toil underground. x Thus in the opinion of the head of the bureau created for the purpose of safeguarding the lives of the mine work- ers, "unnecessary sacrifice of human life" is conditioned by competition among mine operators. According to the inspector-general of mines of Belgium (quoted above), "similar dangerous conditions once existed in France and Belgium, now the safest coal-mining countries in the world/* but they were removed by stringent legisla- tion and by an effective enforcement of the law. 2 In Europe wooden shafts are not permitted, the maximum amount of explosives to be used in one blast is limited by law, all machinery must be properly guarded, etc. Dr. Holmes believes that the adoption of similar regulations in the United States would prevent three fourths of the present 'Joseph A. Holmes: "Coal Mine Accidents and their Prevention," Thirty- Fifth Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Mines of the State of Ohio, 1909, pp. 126-128. a Haynes, loc. cit., pp. 148, 150-151. Clarence Hall and Walter O. Snelling: "Coal Mine Accidents: their Causes and Prevention." Bul- letin of the United States Geological Survey, No. 333, p. 6. Eastman, loc. cit., p. 46. Hoffman, loc. cit., pp. 476-477. Work Accidents 469 loss of life, 1 which implies that "the greatest number cf accidents in bituminous coal mines" (contrary to the view accepted by the immigration Commission), do not arise from "the recklessness, ignorance, and inexperience of employees." This opinion is derived from the statistics of accidents in the United States and foreign countries. The comparative rates of fatal accidents in American and foreign coal mines are shown graphically in Diagram XXV., reproduced from DIAGRAM XXV. 4 3.5 3. 3 - 2J5 2.1 3 2 1.93 |. 3 1.71 1.5 to m 1.6 1.46 1 as NITED STAT 1 ERMANY *J DC i -j 1 t USTRIA 1 1 1 :i 4 iBblil QC lo 1^- let <*j| ^ * 2 5 *f 2 tE 25 li a XXV. Fatal accident rates in coal mines per 1000 workmen employed in the United States and foreign countries. the recent study of the Minnesota Bureau of Labor on the subject of industrial accidents. * The rate of fatal accidents in the United States is thrice as high as in France and Belgium, which shows that two thirds of the fatal accidents in the American mines could be prevented. Considering, 1 Haynes, loc. tit., p. 140. Twelfth Biennial Report of the Bureau of Labor, Industries and Com- merce of the State of Minnesota,, 1909-10, p. 203. 470 Immigration and Labor however, that the natural conditions in American mines are more favorable for the safe extraction of coal than in any other country in the world, x Dr. Holmes's estimate that three fourths of all mining accidents are due to absence of proper precautions is quite conservative. The difference between the accident rate in the United States and those in Austria and Russia deserves special attention, a large percentage of American mine workers being Austrian and Russian immigrants. The American fatality rate is twice as high as the Austrian, Of course, the popular explanation is, that the Austrians and Russians employed in American mines do not understand the English language, whereas in their home countries thev work under the direction of foremen who speak their own languages. In so far as the failure of foreign-born mine workers to understand warnings and instructions given in the English language may affect the rate of accidents in American mines, the difference is clearly chargeable to the carelessness, not of the mine workers, but of the mine operators who fail to pro- vide competent foremen speaking the languages of their em- ployees. In Prussia, where a large and growing percentage of the coal miners are Poles, 2 the fatal accident rate is never- theless 37 per cent below the average for the United States. J 1 United States Geological Survey, Bulletin No. 333, p. 13. The European experts above referred to "unanimously reported that the natural conditions in American mines were much better than in Europe. They found, for example, that up to the present time Americans were not operating in the very deep levels of four thousand feet and lower, not uncommon in Europe, where the task of supplying fresh air and getting rid of dangerous gases is very difficult. In America, also, only thick seams more easily ventilated are, as yet, generally worked. . . . Of late years, with the gradual exhaustion of higher levels, of the thicker seams, and of the supplies of supporting timbers, conditions have come to resemble more nearly those found in Europe, and it is for this reason that the percentage of fatalities has so rapidly increased in the past decade." Haynes, loc. cit. t pp. 141-142. * See Chapter VIII., p. 182. The average for 1900-1904 in Prussia was 2.06 per 1000 employees. United States Geological Survey, Bulletin No. 333, p. 8. Work Accidents 471 This comparison may be pursued further. If it is true that the rate of fatalities in the United States is increased by the employment of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, it may be expected that the rate will be higher in those States where the percentage of Southern and Eastern Europeans is higher among the coal miners. The comparative numbers of lives lost per thousand em- ployees and per one million tons of coal mined in the prin- cipal mining States during the twenty-year period 1889- 1908 are shown on Diagram XXVI, the distance from left to right representing the percentage of persons of Slavic and Italian parentage among the miners in I9OO. 1 These States produced, in 1908, 86.6 per cent of the total output of bituminous coal in the United States. 2 We find the highest rate of fatal accidents per one million tons mined, in Oklahoma, with 14 per cent of Southern and Eastern European mine workers; next follow Tennessee and Alabama, with I per cent and 2 per cent of Southern and Eastern Europeans respectively. On the other hand, in Pennsylvania with 36 per cent, and Illinois with 22 per cent, the rate of accidents is much lower, and ap- proximately the same as in Ohio with 9 per cent, and Indiana with 5.5 per cent. The course of the other curve is the same: West Virginia, Alabama, and Tennessee, with small percentages of Southern and Eastern European mine workers, have higher fatality rates per one thousand em- ployees than Pennsylvania and Illinois with much larger percentages of Southern and Eastern Europeans. 1 For rates of fatal accidents cf. Hoffman, loc cit., p. 452; the percent- ages of miners of Southern and Eastern European parentage were computed from XII. Census Report on Occupations, Table 41. The figures are given in the Appendix, Table XXVII. The census classifica- tion of breadwinners by occupation, nativity, and state makes no distinc- tion between coal miners and metalliferous miners. This comparison accordingly comprises only such States in which there are no metalli- ferous mines, or the number of metalliferous miners is negligible, com- pared with the number of coal miners. 3 Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1910, Table 120, pp. 208-209. II Si sis 1 8.3 472 Work Accidents 473 These comparisons are not invalidated by the increase of the proportion of Southern and Eastern Europeans among the coal miners since 1900. The investigation of the Immi- gration Commission in 1900 found 64.3 per cent of Southern and Eastern Europeans among the coal miners of Penn- sylvania, while the official statistics for West Virginia in 1908 showed 28.9 per cent of the same races 1 ; and yet the average fatal accident rate per one thousand employees or per one million tons in West Virginia was much higher than in Pennsylvania. The Immigration Commission lays great stress on the fact that the percentage of fatalities among the foreign- speaking miners in those two States is relatively higher than among the English-speaking employees. This difference, however, proves nothing without a further classification of both language groups by occupation. The distribution of the English-speaking and non-English-speaking mine workers on the scale of occupations is not uniform, and there is a wide range of variation in the degree of risk incident to each occupation. The influence of the first factor will be clear from the following. Machine runners and car loaders work side by side in the mine. The machine runner is the man who runs the mining machinery necessarily a skilled miner; the car loader is a common laborer. And yet we find that in 1899-1908 the proportion of native white among machine runners who lost their lives in West Vir- ginia was 80.8 per cent, while the proportion of Southern and Eastern Europeans among car loaders killed was 48.4 per cent; on the other hand, the proportion of Southern and Eastern Europeans among machine runners killed was only 6.4 per cent, while the proportion of native white among car loaders killed was 24.3 per cent. 2 It would be absurd to infer from these figures that the Southern and Eastern Europeans were more experienced and more careful 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 226, Table 140; p. 228, Table 143. > Jloffnjan, he cit., p. 640. 474 Immigration and Labor than the native white, when the truth is that there are few Southern and Eastern Europeans among the machine runners and few native white among the car loaders. In- asmuch, however, as there are several loaders to one machine runner, more loaders are killed than machine runners. The effect of these arithmetical aberrations upon the general average is to swell the ratio of Southern and Eastern Europeans to the total of fatal accidents. The effect of the nature of the risk upon fatal accidents by lace and nativity is shown in Table 131. TABLE 131. NUMBER AND PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF FATAL ACCIDENTS IN COAL MINES OF WEST VIRGINIA BY PRINCIPAL CAUSES AND NATIVITY OF PERSONS KILLED, 1899-1908, AND PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYEES BY NATIVITY, I9OO. 1 Race or nativity Per cent of employees Falling coal, slate, etc. Explosions Other causes 2 Number s 8 1 Number Per cent Number Per cent Native white 46.3 21.8 3-o 28.9 392 207 68 285 41.2 21.8 7-1 29.9 246 130 59 387 30.0 15-8 7-1 47.1 194 84 8 61 55-9 24.2 2-3 17-6 Negro Northern and Western Europe. . . Eastern and Southern Europe Total IOO.O 952 IOO.O 822 100.0 347 100.0 If the "relative number of fatalities among the employees of a given race or group of races" can "serve as a valuable indication of the extent to which the high death-rate in the mines is to be attributed to the employment of men by 1 Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor, No. 90, Table XX., p. 646. Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p.~228, Table 143. * Cars (inside and outside) , motors and machinery, electrocution and falling into shafts. Work Accidents 475 that race or group, " J then the following conclusions logically follow from the preceding table: 1 . While the recent immigrants contribute no more than their proportionate share of fatalities from falling coal, slate, etc., the high death-rate from explosions is attribut- able to them. On the other hand native Americans con- tribute less than their quota of accidents from these causes. 2. The older immigrants from Northern and Western Europe contribute twice their share of fatalities from falls of roofs and explosions, which indicates that the employ- ment of older immigrants is a menace to the safety of the men inside the mines. 3. The native white contribute more than their quota of fatalities from cars, motors, machinery, and contact with electric wires, whereas the Southern and Eastern Europeans contribute considerably less than their quota, which indi- cates that the high death-rate from those causes is at- tributable to the employment of men of native American stock. 4. The replacement of native Americans by Southern and Eastern European immigrants who apparently show greater aptitude for handling complicated modern machin- ery than native Americans, would tend to reduce the fatality rate from cars, motors, machinery, and electric shocks. On the other hand the displaced American mechanics could be employed to advantage as common laborers in the mines, which would tend to reduce the fatal accident rate from falling roofs and explosions. The palpable absurdity of these conclusions proves that the premises from which they are deduced are untenable. The low percentage of Southern and Eastern Europeans among the sufferers from accidents due to machinery, motors, etc., merely indicates that they do not come in contact with these death-dealing agencies as often as Americans. Similarly, the lower ratio of native white among the sufferers from falling roofs and explosions is 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 233. 476 Immigration and Labor attributable to the fact that a large proportion among them are employed in supervisory positions, where they are not exposed to the ordinary risks incident to working under- ground. It is sought to deduce a causal connection between the increase of the fatal accident rate and the employment of recent immigrants from their ignorance of mining conditions which exposes them to greater danger. If this be so, it is an argument, not against immigration, but against the development of the coal mining industry. It is evident that if the mining industry is to grow apace with the development of the country, new men must continually be engaged. No one is born with mining experience, even in the United States, and there is no other place where mining experience can be gained except in a mine. The danger resulting from allowing inexperienced men, whether native or foreign- born, to work in a coal mine merely emphasizes the need of providing by law for the employment of a sufficient proportion of experienced miners to supervise the work of new employees. x So dangerous, however, are the working conditions in American mines that, according to Mr. Hoffman, "mine experience, even of considerable length, is not necessarily a protective factor." 2 His opinion rests upon a classification of accidents by occupation and length of experience. It appears that in every occupation the majority of those who were killed in West Virginia in 1899- 1 Says Mr. John Laing, chief of the West Virginia Department of Mines, in a letter to the Immigration Commission: "In our large mines where in the past labor was turned loose to shoot coal, load coal, and care for themselves, we now have an officer known as 'assistant mine foreman* employed to every thirty-five men, who works in the mine and whose specific duty is to see that all coal is properly mined, that all places are timbered, that a system of ventilation is properly brought forward, etc., before a miner be permitted to do blasting of any kind." Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 238. 3 "It is significant," says Mr. Hoffman, "that there should have been 43 deaths of men who had been at work from 10-14 years, 13 deaths of men with 15-19 years of mine experience and 1 1 deaths of men with 20 or more years' experience." Loc. cit., p. 485. Work Accidents 477 1908 had an experience of not less than one year, and in some occupations one of more than five years, e. g., fire bosses 100 per cent; track layers 60.8 per cent; machine runners 59.5 per cent, etc. Among the miners, the most numerous and exposed class, 39.7 per cent had an experience of over five years. x The preceding classification deals with length of experi- ence, without regard to race or nationality. It might be argued that the Southern and Eastern Europeans are handi- capped by ignorance of the English language even after years of employment in the mines and possibly swell the numbers of victims with long experience. This supposition is dismissed by the West Virginia statistics in which the accidents are classified by nativity and length of experience, as shown in Table 132: TABLE 132. NUMBER AND PER CENT OF TOTAL ACCIDENTS TO COAL MINERS, CLASSIFIED BY NATIVITY AND LENGTH OF EXPERIENCE IN WEST VIRGINIA, 1899-1908. 3 Numbe r Per cent Length of experience English- speaking white Southern and Eastern European 1 i! IP Southern and Eastern Europeans ! Under I year 124 ISO 66 18 i 24. 4 22.8 15 years 221 ^06 IJC \2 2 *q~4 40.6 1Q.8 14.1 1 6O 1 08 4Q.7 i^y.w 26.O ^7.4 ' Total 686 616 280 IOO O IOO.O IOO.O This table shows that experience of the mine workers counts for very little in fatal accidents: one half of all English-speaking mine workers had had an experience of 1 Hoffman, loc. cit., Table XVII., p. 643, d., Table XIX., p. 645. 478 Immigration and Labor more than five years when they lost their lives. Of the Southern and Eastern Europeans killed, one fourth had worked more than five years in the mines and three fourths more than one year. The smaller percentage of Southern and Eastern Europeans who lost their lives after an experi- ence of more than five years cannot be taken as proof that inexperience was the cause of death in all other cases: it must be borne in mind that most of the Southern and East- ern European miners in West Virginia are recent immigrants, who for this arithmetical reason alone must contribute a larger number to the death roll of persons with brief experi- ence. If it is sought to explain the prevalence of more recent immigrants among the victims of accidents by their negligence, due to inexperience, it must follow as a corollary that the higher percentage of miners of long experience among the English-speaking victims proves them to be twice as careless or as ignorant as the Southern and Eastern Europeans. This assumption does not agree, however, with the fact that the percentage of recent employees among the victims of accidents is approximately the same for every language or race group. It is clear that the knowl- edge of the English language gives the new mine worker scarcely greater immunity from accident than that which the law of chance allows to the non-English-speaking miner. The cause of accidents in coal mines is not philological, but technological. Withal, it is an undeniable fact that the fatal accident rate has increased in the bituminous coal mines of the United States within the last twenty years, simultaneously with the increasing numbers of Slavs and Italians employed in the mines. This coincidence is accepted as sufficient proof that the increasing employment of Southern and Eastern Europeans in coal mines has been the cause of the increase in the fatal accident rate. This explanation is contradicted, however, by the sfatistics of accidents in the anthracite coal mines of Pennsylvania, for which there are data going as far back as 1870. In 1909, 60 per cent I 479 480 Immigration and Labor of the inside employees in the anthracite mines were of the non-English-speaking races. 1 As shown on Diagram XXVII, 2 the greatest relative numbers of fatal accidents were recorded back in 1870-1874, when the employees were all English-speaking. The lowest rate per one million tons mined is reported for the year 1903, and the next lowest for the year 1909. In the face of this fact, the increase in the number of recent immigrant employees cannot stand as an explanation of the increase of the accident rate in bituminous mines. The European mining experts, mentioned before, lay stress upon the " gradual exhaustion of higher levels, of the thicker seams, and of the supplies of supporting timbers, . . . and it is for this reason (they hold) that the percentage of fatalities has so rapidly increased in the past decade." 3 No doubt "contributory negligence" on the part of the Southern and Eastern European may figure as a factor in many accidents. It is claimed, e. g., by American and English-speaking miners, that the lives of the mine workers are endangered by the carelessness of the recent immigrants whose "desire . . . for large earnings . . . leads them to neglect to take the proper measures . . . relative to tim- bering and other precautions, for the reason that these measures require the loss of time from their productive work and the consequent decrease in earnings." 4 This claim is nothing but the outworn common-law defence of "negligence of fellow-servant," in an employer's liability action. From the modern point of view the employer's duty to furnish his employees a safe place of work is not discharged by leaving the necessary timbering to be done by volunteers for the common good without extra compen- sation. It is his duty to hire special men for that work and to keep the mine safe at his own expense. Be it as it may, 1 Report of the Department of Mines of Pennsylvania, 1909, Part I. pp. 25-26. a The figures will be found in the Appendix, Table XXVIII. * Haynes, loc. cit., p. 142. * Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 6, p. 652. Work Accidents 481 it is well to remember, however, that in those days when there were no "ignorant foreigners" to whom the responsi- bility for mine accidents could be shifted, it was the "reck- lessness" of the English-speaking miners 1 that was to blame. As far back as 1875, a Pennsylvania mine inspector said in his report: "I am sorry to have to report that a majority of the accidents that occur in the coal mines are the result of recklessness of the workmen themselves." 2 This comment was as general in the early reports of the Pennsylvania state mine inspectors, according to Dr. Roberts, as in the recent reports quoted by the Immigration Commission. It is evident that an American farmer boy who for the first time goes down into a mine is as incapable of a proper appreciation of the dangers of mining as a recent Slav immigrant. But even an experienced miner faced every day of his life with the "one universal characteristic" of American mining conditions "the criminal disregard of the considerations of safety" 3 at length comes to feel that "a man may as well pass in his checks that way as any other." 4 If he is to continue as a miner, he must develop a frame of mind akin to that of a soldier in war-time. While carelessness on the part of the miners may be a contri- butory cause in many accidents, the "carelessness" itself is, as Dr. Roberts put it a "psychological effect of accidents. " s In the iron and steel mills there is the same disposition as in coal mining to shift the responsibility for accidents to the ignorance of the "Hunkie." Speaking of the "per- sonal factor" in industrial accidents, Miss Eastman sub- ordinates it to "the pressure and speed at which the plant is run, an expression of the employ er's direct financial interest in the output." One of the older and wiser mill superintendents in the Pittsburgh District told me [says she], that the one greatest cause of danger in 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, p. 232. Roberts, loc. cit., p. 154. * Haynes, loc. cit. t p. 148. * Words of a miner quoted from the report of a Pennsylvania mine inspector, Roberts, loc. cit. t p. 154. s Ibid, 482 Immigration and Labor the steel mills is the tremendous rush of the work. "In the mills in England," he said, "they begin to work about 6, stop at 8:30 for forty- five minutes for the men to get breakfast; stop again at I for an hour for the men to get dinner, and stop again at 5 130 for half an hour. At these periods everything stops. The machinery is quiet. This is the reason why the English mills do not produce as much steel in the same length of time as the American mills. Here the machinery never stops. Another shift is always ready and waiting to step into the place of the shift that is leaving. Not a moment is lost. If a mill stops three minutes for repairs, or for any other cause, a detailed report of this must be made by the man in charge. If this happens two or three times under one man, the matter will be taken up with a question as to his efficiency. Under this kind of a drive, how can anybody be careful? " When we read then, of a man who went up to make repairs without stopping the crane, or of a man who tried to throw a belt without slow- ing down the shaft, we must not lay the resulting accident unquestion- ingly to his own personal, ill-considered haste. Perhaps he was but a part of a great machine going too fast for safety. Every man in the process must keep the pace of the whole. He can no more go his own gait than a spoke in a wheel can go its own gait. * But the Southern and Eastern European is charged with more than ignorant carelessness or passive acquiescence in dangerous conditions, the very existence of such con- ditions "has been due to ... his tractability or sub- serviency": When the older employees have found unsafe and insanitary working conditions prevailing in the mines and industrial establishments, and have protested, the recent immigrant employees, usually through ignor- ance of mining or other working methods, have manifested a willing- ness to accept the alleged unsatisfactory condition. 2 As an illustration of such ineffective "protests," the commission cites a case where an American miner was discharged for refusing to work in a chamber which was in need of timbering, and was replaced by a foreigner. 3 Similar examples could, doubtless, be multiplied at will, considering the general disregard for safety in coal mines. Such indi- 1 Eastman, loc. tit., pp. 64, 85, 94. 9 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 501. *Ibid. t vol. 6, p. 241. Work Accidents 483 vidual objections, however, scarcely amount to a "protest." If the English-speaking miners had shown a disposition to "protest" against dangerous working conditions, it cer- tainly must have found some expression in their strikes. We learn that during the twenty-year period from 1881 to 1900, there occurred 2515 strikes in the coal and coke industry, involving 14,575 establishments. Of the latter number there were nine (p) in which strikes were declared against dangerous working conditions. 1 These figures con- clusively prove that the American miners made no concerted protest against dangerous working conditions even in the early *8o's, when the Southern and Eastern Europeans employed in the mines were but a handful. To what extent,if at all, individual objectionsof the "older employees" would have been effective in advancing the introduction of better working conditions, in the absence of Southern and Eastern European immigrant employees, can be judged by a comparison with another extra-hazard- ous industry, viz., steam railroads, in which the proportion of non-English-speaking employees is very small.* 1 Sixteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, pp. 352-353, 480-481. The objects for which these strikes were ordered were as follows: Number of estab- lishments Succeeded For better ventilation A i The same and for repair of machinery For change of machinery I I I Against use of electrical mining machines without jacketed motors . ... I For company to have roadway in mine sprinkled I For enforcement of mining laws concerning the placing of timbers . . I I Total According to the census of 1900, the ratio of non-English-speaking workmen employed on the railroads was only 7.5 per cent. Reports of (he Immigration Commission, vol. i, pp. 821-829. 484 Immigration and Labor There is a marked distinction in this respect between different classes of railroad employees. The trainmen are as a rule, English-speaking, the Slavs, Hungarians, and Italians being employed mainly on construction work. In Diagram XXVIII. are plotted the accident rates per 1000 employees in bituminous and anthracite coal mines and on railroads, for the twenty-year period from 1889 to 1908. l The accident rate for all railway employees is not much lower than the rate for coal miners. But the fatal accident rate among trainmen is a great deal higher and has been steadily increasing since 1894. The number of accidents resulting in personal injuries to railroad employees is still greater. In 1891-1909 it varied from one in every thirty-three, to one in every seventeen employees. The ratio of injured trainmen varied during the same period from one in every twelve, to one in eight. It stood at the last figure in 1906-1908 and declined to one in nine during the year 1909.* This means that in nine years' service every trainman has a probability of one hundred per cent to sustain personal injuries. The ratio of native Americans to all railroad employees killed in work accidents, according to available informa- tion, was 72 per cent in the Pittsburgh district, 3 and 62.8 per cent in Illinois; the proportion of those who suffered personal injuries in Illinois was 66.6 per cent. 4 The trainmen who run the greatest risk of death, or personal injury, are all English-speaking and cannot be replaced by non-English-speaking immigrants. Strike statistics show that the employees in all industries combined under the head of "transportation" struck for 212 different causes 1 The figures on which this diagram is based arc given in the Appendix, Table XXIX. a Statistical Abstract of the United Stales, 1910, Table 181, p. 284. Eastman, loc. cit. t p. 14, Table 3; number of native Americans 89, out of a total of 123 killed in accidents. * Fifteenth Biennial Report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of Illinois, pp. 161, 251. a fi - g "\W -r 486 Immigration and Labor in 3436 establishments, but the number of establishments in which strikes were declared against unsafe machinery and other dangers incident to employment was only seven. 1 This comparison may be extended to all classes of em- ployment, loss of life and limb being an incident rather than an accident of modern industry. The Sixteenth Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of Labor enumerates 1422 different causes of strikes for the twenty- year period 1891-1900. The total number of establishments which were affected by strikes during that period was 117,509. The number among them where strikes were de- clared against unsafe machinery and other dangers incident to employment was only eighty-three. 2 These figures testify that "acquiescence in dangerous and unsanitary working conditions " is the general attitude of organized and unorganized workers in labor disputes. This apparent indifference cannot be explained by the obstruction of the Southern and Eastern Europeans be- cause the majority of the wage-earners as late as 1900 were of native birth. 3 It may reasonably be assumed that organized labor does not feel strong enough to enforce demands which would involve large outlays by employers for safe equipment and other improvements. The indi- vidual workman realizes that it would be quixotic on his part to "protest" singly against evils which organized labor is powerless to remedy. 1 Sixteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, Table X. pp. 510-513. *Ibid., Table XI, pp. 519-541- Hourwich, loc. cit., p. 327, Table VIII. PART IV CONCLUSION CHAPTER XXIII PROBABLE EFFECTS OF RESTRICTION A FORECAST IT was recognized by the Immigration Commission that the industrial expansion of the preceding twenty years would have been impossible without "the new immigration." But the Commission held "a slow expansion of industry" preferable to "immigration of laborers of low standards." 1 The Commission accordingly recommended that "a sufficient number be debarred to produce a marked effect upon the present supply of unskilled labor." 2 What is "a sufficient number"? A learned advocate of restriction, Prof. Fairchild, referring to the period from December, 1907, to August, 1908, when emigration exceeded immigration by 124,124, finds that "this figure is almost infinitesimal compared to the total mass of the American working people or to the amount of unemployment at a normal time, 1 ' The net result of the emigration movement of those nine months was tantamount to a prohibition of immigra- tion, yet it had "a very trifling palliative effect." 3 The slowing down of the pace of industrial development must necessarily curtail the opportunities for advancement of the wage-earners who are already here. 4 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, p. 45. 2 Ibid., p. 47. Henry Pratt Fairchild: "Immigration and Crises," The American Economic Review, December, 1911, p. 758. 4 The skilled crafts whose organizations were urging the adoption of the recommendation of the Commission for the exclusion of unskilled immigrants were apparently willing to swallow the recommendation in favor of legislation that would facilitate the importation of skilled labor under contract. (Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol, i, p. 47-) 487 488 Immigration and Labor On the other hand, the unemployed could gain nothing from a slow growth of industry. In times of rapid indus- trial expansion the demand for labor is more active than in times of industrial stagnation. Inasmuch as unem- ployment is not due to an absolute oversupply of labor, but results from seasonal and cyclical variations in the general demand for labor, as well as from variations in the demands of individual employers, it is clear that these causes could not be removed by reducing the supply of labor. If the industries of the United States can furnish steady employment all year round to eighty per cent of all wage-earners and in times of maximum activity to ninety- five per cent, 2 but must have the full one hundred per cent ready on call, there being no agency for dovetailing the de- mands of scattered individual employers, these ratios will not be affected by the scale of national production. If instead of letting the number of factory workers grow to seven million by 1909, the law had kept it at 5,600,000, as it had been in 1904, i.e., twenty per cent below the 1909 figure, the industrial reserve of twenty per cent would not have been wiped out, but would have only been smaller in proportion. Yet the 1,120,000 irregularly employed in 1904 exerted the same economic pressure on the 4,480,000 who were employed all year around, as the 1,400,000 on the 5,600,000 in 1909. The problem of the five per cent irreducible minimum of unemployed was no less serious when they were only 280,000 in 5,600,000, than when they grew to be 350,000 in 7,000,000. The mere exclu- sion of unskilled immigrants, and even of all immigrants, will not provide employment for all masons and carpenters in the winter, or for the full winter force of a Wisconsin logging camp in the summer. Nor will the restriction of immigration revolutionize the world of fashion, so as to permit of the filling of orders for ladies' garments out of *A11 figures in this example are merely estimates based upon the statistics of the XII. and the XIII. Census. They are used only for purposes of illustration. Probable Effects of Restriction A Forecast 489 season. In order to provide regular employment for the industrial reserve, all industries would have to be run upon a common time schedule, like railway trains are run on connecting lines. No plan of such a reorganization of industry has as yet been proposed that would be acceptable to all advocates of immigration restriction, let alone the proprietors of half a million independent mining, manu- facturing, and mercantile establishments. It is hardly reasonable to expect a systematic adjustment of business activity on such a gigantic scale to grow up spontaneously from a purely negative measure shutting out immigration. As a theoretical proposition, it seems quite plausible that the exclusion of "a sufficient number" of immigrants "to produce a marked effect upon the supply of unskilled labor" must force employers to pay scarcity rate of wages. It is needless, however, to indulge in abstract speculation on the possible effects of a reduced supply of unskilled immigrant labor, when such a condition actually exists in the United States throughout the agricultural sections. Few immigrants seek employment on the farms. At the census of 1900 the total number of Southern and Eastern European male farm laborers in the United States was only 3 7, 40 1. 1 The number of all foreign-born male farm laborers had actually decreased from 1890 to i9oo. 2 Moreover, there is a constant stream of native labor from the farms to the cities, which has led to an actual decrease of the rural population in many agricultural counties. Farmers gen- erally complain of scarcity of farm labor during the agri- cultural season. Nevertheless, the wages of farm laborers are lower than the wages of unskilled laborers in mines and mills, where the proportion of recent immigrants is rapidly increasing. Scarcity of labor has not forced the farmer to pay scarcity wages, but has merely retarded the growth of farming. In many places the area under cultivation has actually decreased. On the other hand, the problem how 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. I, Table A, pp. 821-829. 2 Occupations, XII. Census, Table XXXIV, p. cviii. 490 Immigration and Labor to increase production with the same supply of labor has been solved by labor-saving machinery. The shutting- out of unskilled immigrants would have similar effects in manufacturing and mining. The labor that would thus be displaced would form one substitute for immigration. The coal mines of Alabama and other Southern States which have failed to attract immigrants utilize the labor of farmers and their sons. The 2,300,000 tenant-farmers in particular offer great possibilities as an industrial re- serve available during the winter months when the de- mand for labor in the coal mines is most active. The farm being their main source of subsistence, they are able and willing to offer their labor during the idle winter months more cheaply than freshly-landed immigrants. The efforts of trade-union organizers among this class of English- speaking workers have met with scant success. With the farmer who works in a mine during the winter months, the dominating interest is his farm, whereas his interest in his employment is but transitory. He may not return to the mine the next winter; he accordingly expects no benefit from an eventual gain in wages, whereas a pro- tracted strike may deprive him of his earnings which are needed immediately to pay interest on a mortgage or to buy a machine. He is therefore reluctant to enter into a labor contest. The substitution of the cheap labor of the American farmer for the labor of the Slav or Italian immi- grant would tend to weaken the unions and to keep down wages. The discontinuance of fresh supplies of immigrant labor for the cotton mills of New England would give a new impetus to the development of the cotton industry in the South, where there is an abundant supply of child labor. The shortage of immigrant labor could also be made up for in part by the available reserve of cheap female labor. The employment of all these, substitutes for regular wage-earners certainly has its limitations. Summer is the most active season in many manufacturing industries. Probable Effects of Restriction A Forecast 491 Other industries are localized and cannot spread out to agricultural districts. But there is in the United States, as in all industrial countries, a steady flow of labor from rural to urban districts. In the absence of immigration of unskilled laborers the depopulation of the rural districts would be accelerated. A stimulated movement of labor from the farm to the factory must act as a drawback on the growth of farming, and the prices of foodstuffs would rise in consequence, which would tend to offset the advantages to the wage-earners from a possible rise of wages. Still, should all the substitutes for immigrant labor prove inadequate for the needs of the employers, it does not necessarily follow that scarcity prices would rule in the American labor market. It must be borne in mind that capital is international. Billions of American capital are already invested in Mexican and other foreign undertakings. At present this is but a minor item compared with the profits of American industries annually reinvested at home. If, however, a scarcity of labor were created in the United States, more American capital would seek investment abroad. Instead of investing their profits in new mines and mills in the United States, American capitalists would export their money to build up new enterprises in countries with cheap labor. The increased investment of American capital in the industrial development of foreign countries with cheap labor must eventually react upon labor conditions in the United States. Certain of the most important American industries depend in part upon the export trade. At present the great smelting works of New Jersey import ore from Mexico and employ Slav immigrants to smelt and refine it into lead and copper, a great deal of which is then exported to Europe. Should the immigration of Slav laborers be barred the lead and copper producers could accommodate themselves to the situation by erecting plants in Mexico and exporting the refined lead and copper directly to London. Such a plan would not be a new departure in the world of 492 Immigration and Labor industry. American, English, French, Belgian, and German manufacturers in the past found it more profitable to estab- lish factories in Russia than to export their products to that country. A scarcity of labor in the United States would induce many American manufacturers to extend that policy. Such an emigration of American capital would materially affect the export trade of the United States and eventually throw out of employment a number of American wage- earners dependent upon that trade. It is evident that while restriction of immigration can limit the supply of labor, it is powerless to prevent a cor- responding limitation of the demand for labor. The Immigration Commission believed that "a slow ex- pansion of industry," in the absence of "the immigration of laborers of low standards," would raise "the American standard of wages." Yet the Commission did not explain how a mere Platonic desire to maintain a high standard of living could of itself raise the rates of wages, unless the relation of demand and supply in the labor market were favorable to the wage-earner. The recent crisis has fur- nished a practical illustration bearing upon this point. When the operations of the steel mills were reduced, a great many men were laid off. The companies, however, offered their skilled men positions as laborers. 1 Neither their high American standard of living, nor their high standard of wages, nor their efficiency enabled them to insist upon higher wages than those which had been paid to unskilled laborers before the crisis. "A slow expansion of industry" is synonymous with an inactive demand for labor, and it is an elementary maxim of Political Economy that an inactive demand for labor is unfavorable to in- creases in wages. 1 "The few unskilled places that were open were filled by Americans who were normally skilled workmen, but who at the time of the depres- sion were compelled to take any kind of-work they could get. "Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, pp. 39, 40. "Skilled American employees . . . were glad to turn to unskilled occupations at twelve to fifteen cents an hour." Ibid., p. 597. CHAPTER XXIV THE LESSONS OP THE WAR THE World War offered an opportunity to test the effects of restriction of immigration under the most favorable conditions. During the war immigration was reduced to a very low level. Departing aliens at times outnumbered both the newcomers and returning immigrants. Though the out- break of the war was followed by a year of industrial depres- sion in this country, the United States soon became the chief producer of war supplies for the Allied nations. Beginning with the spring of 1916 the supply of labor in the United States fell short of the demand in the labor market. The entrance of the United States into the war withdrew more than two million workers from industry. The government assumed the function of regulating wages in the leading industries, with the co-operation of the officers of the Amer- ican Federation of Labor. Prominent men of avowed labor sympathies were placed at the head of the War Labor Board. If the economic condition of the American wage earner can be improved by suspension of immigration, here was the opportunity to observe its beneficial effects. Indeed, the final report of the Commission on Industrial Relations, prepared by Mr. Basil M. Manly, Director of Research and Investigation, contains the following state- ment: "The great diminution of immigration as a result of the European war, has already begun to show its salutary effects." l The report does not specify the particulars in which these "salutary effects" had manifested themselves by August 9, 1915, which is its official date. It baldly asserts that the "evidence presented to the Commission" warrants 1 Industrial Relations: Final Report and Testimony, vol. i, p. 144 494 Immigration and Labor the conclusion "that the enormous influx of immigrants dur- ing the past twenty-five years has been the largest single factor in preventing the wage scale from rising as rapidly as food prices." l The evidence was not published by the Commis- sion; reference is only made in the Director's letter of sub- mittal to reports presented to the Commission by Professor Lauck and Mr. Sydenstricker. The data contained in these reports were perused by them in a book published in 19 17.* This is what they actually have to say on the subject: The recent advances in wage rates which have been occasioned by the unusual demand for labor at a time of restricted immigration con- stitute, of course, a certain advantage in economic status to wage earn- ers in many instances. . . . How far these increases in rates, aside from the increases in earnings made possible by steady employment during a period of great industrial activity, have kept pace with increases in prices of necessaries and of the ordinary comforts used by wage-earning families, is impossible of statement until accurate statistics are ob- tained and published. 8 A vast amount of statistical data on every aspect of the economic situation has since been published. A brief sum- mary of t'he available evidence will be sufficient to disprove the optimistic assurance of the Industrial Commission. At the annual meetings of the American Economic and the American Statistical Association held at Atlantic City in December, 1920, two series of index numbers of physical production were presented, one by Dr. Walter W. Stewart, the other by Dr. Edmund E. Day. Though their indices differ for particular years, yet both show a growth of pro- duction during the war period much in excess of the rate of the preceding quadrennial period. A comparative summary of the principal items of both series for the years 1910, 1914, and 1918 is presented in Table 133 next following, where the index numbers are con- 1 Industrial Relations: Final Report and Testimony, vol. i, p. 144. s W. Jett Lauck and Edgar Sydenstricker: Condition of Labor in American Industries, p. xi. 9 Ibid., pp. 70-71. The Lessons of the War 495 verted to the base of 1914 as 100. The comparative growth of manufactures, mining, agriculture, and population, during the war and the preceding period beginning with 1899, is shown graphically in Diagram XXIX, reproduced from Doc- tor Day's Chart A. TABLE 133 INDICES OF MANUFACTURES, MINING, AND TRANSPORTATION, IQIO, 1914, Manufactures Mining Year TVAnJTV>rfr at inn Day's Stewart's Day's Stewart's 1910. . . . 97 9 8 IOO 94 96 1914.... IOO IOO IOO IOO IOO 1918 125 144 138 132 139 This unparalleled growth of industry was marked by ex- traordinary profits. The following analysis is quoted from a survey presented to the United States Railroad Labor Board by Prof. W. Jett Lauck, on behalf of a number of labor unions. His evidence is taken from the financial re- ports of 205 large corporations, with an aggregate capital stock of over $5,000,000,000. Their annual net income in- creased from an average of 8.7 per cent for the pre-war period 1912-1914, to an average of 23.9 per cent for the war period 1916-1918. After all expenses of operation and maintenance had been paid (says Professor Lauck), after all charges for replacement of capital had been set aside in fact, after every conceivable or imaginary expense had been met these great groups of corporations, controlling the various products essential to our life, made profits which were sufficient to re- place the entire value of the capital stock within a period of slightly over four years. This is proved by their own published reports. l , "An Index Number of Production," by Walter W. Stewart. Amer- ican Economic Review, March, 1921, p. 68. "The Measurement of Variations in the National Real Income," by Edmund E. Day. Quar- terly of the American Statistical Association, March, 1921, p. 555. 496 300 Immigration and Labor DIAGRAM XXIX. 200 1099 1905 1910 1915 1919 XXIX. Indices of Physical Production for Agriculture, Mining and Manufacture, 1899-1919. Those corporations were not at all exceptional. The ex- traordinary profits of industry during the war appear in a document submitted to the Senate by the Treasury Depart- ment, entitled "Corporate Earnings and Government Rev- enue." This document shows the incomes of approximately 20,000 corporations. Altogether they earned in 1917 an average return on capital stock of 33.5 per cent, after all taxes had been deducted. Over one-fourth of these corporations, 5,724 in number, showed net profits of over 50 per cent on capital stock. And over one-tenth of them (2,030) showed net profits of over 100 per cent. In other words, there were over 5,000 corporations which, in 1917, earned over one-half the value of their capital stock and over 2,000 that earned the entire value in a single year. 1 1 W. Jett Lauck: The Relation Between Wages and the Increased Cost of Living, pp. 7, 9-12. The Lessons of the War 497 The preceding analysis was made by a representative of organized labor. The same conclusions, however, are reached by Professor Friday, who, in his study of the relations between profits, wages, and prices, endeavors to take a judicial atti- tude, although inclining at times toward the capital side. The net income of all corporations, as reported to the Bureau of Internal Revenue, amounted in 1914 approximately to $3,700,000,000; in 1916 it more than doubled, reaching well nigh $8,600,000,000. When the United States entered the war, the corporations were made to yield to the government in excess profit taxes about $2,000,000,000, and yet their profits for the year 1917 remained at the level of the pre- vious year. Of course the net earnings of the various classes of corporations widely varied. The earnings of mining and manufacturing corporations in 1917 were nearly 330 per cent of those of 1913, the largest pre-war year. A classification of manufacturing, mining, and mercantile corporations ac- cording to the percentage ratio of their net income to in- vested capital shows that more than one-half of the total net income was earned by concerns which made 30 per cent or over. The profits of railroads and other public utility corporations, being regulated by the public authorities, did not rise to such heights, yet in 1916 they were 53 per cent above the 1913 level, and in 1917 they still remained 30 per cent above the pre-war level. "The popular impression," sums up Professor Friday, "that the war has brought a large increase in profits is fully borne out by the facts. The growth has been large, even after the payment of income and excess profits taxes." 1 A glance at Diagram XXIX will show how far the growth of population lagged behind the industrial expansion of the war years. This was directly due to the decrease of immi- gration. The annual net immigration or emigration of bread- winners from July i, 1914, to June 30, 1919, is shown in Table 134. 1 David Friday: Profits, Wages, and Prices, pp. 14, 15, 18, 36, 38, 39. 498 Immigration and Labor TABLE 134. NET IMMIGRATION OR EMIGRATION OF BREADWINNERS, Year ended Net immigration (+) June 30th or emigration (-) 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 Total +138,149 The excess of all alien arrivals over all departing aliens, in- cluding dependents ("persons without occupation, mostly women and children," in official terminology) aggregated during the same period 431,884. Thus, the additions to the population through immigration during the war period rep- resented mostly dependents of immigrants who had previously settled in the United States. The addition of 138,149 immi- grant breadwinners was by far insufficient to make up for the mortality among earlier immigrants. 2 The effects of the cessation of immigration upon the state of the labor market are reflected in the statistics compiled by the New York State Industrial Commission. From the month of March, 1916, to the end of the year 1918, the sup- ply of labor registered at the public employment offices varied from 97.1 per cent to 47.1 per cent of the demand for labor. 3 Such was the relation of supply and demand at the gate- way of the United States. That this condition was not exceptional, is evidenced by the suspension of the contract- labor law in 1917, 1918, 1919, and 1920, in order to enable 1 See Appendix, Table XXXI. 2 During the ten years from July I, 1910, to June 30, 1920, the excess of arriving over departing aliens aggregated 3,123,000 persons (see Ap- pendix, Table XXX.). The increase of the foreign-born population from the XIII. to the XIV. Census (1910-1920) was only 358,000 (see Table 7 on p. 88). The decrease of the number of foreign-born by death thus amounted to 2,765,000. 8 See Appendix, Table XXXII. The Lessons of the War 499 mine operators and other employers in the Southwest to import Mexican laborers under contract. 1 During those four years 50,800 Mexican contract laborers were imported under departmental regulations which were tantamount to peonage. 2 This measure is justified, in a report of a com- mittee appointed by Ex-Secretary of Labor Wilson, by "the fact that immigration from Europe had practically ceased." It is explained that "a dire and imperative need was met in making the exceptions and permitting Mexican labor to enter this country on easy terms to meet the abnormal demand for common labor." It should be remembered that Mr. Wilson was made the first Secretary of Labor as the spokesman for organized labor, having been a vice-president of the Amer- ican Federation of Labor and a district president of the United Mine Workers. Obviously such a striking departure from the policy of organized labor must have been necessi- tated by a genuine scarcity of labor. 8 The effects of the war upon the state of the labor market during the war are well summarized in the following excerpt from a recent book on war-time strikes: In times of emergency and consequent abnormal labor demand, there arises a competition for men which disturbs to a marked degree the wage relationships of normal times. For normal times, as our economic system is constituted, have always meant times of labor surplus. . . . When, however, the demand for men far exceeds the supply, employers compete among one another and are willing in many cases to pay wages even higher than union rates. In open-shop industries men were offered these increased rates irrespective of their union membership. ... A further consequence of the abnormal war conditions was an un- precedented mobility of labor. Every method, including patriotic ap- peals in the press and on public platforms, was used to bring home to the workers of other localities the need of men in places where war 1 Monthly Labor Review, November, 1920, p. 223. 2 See note in the Appendix. 8 Still, the same Secretary Wilson, in a press statement under date of January 10, 1918, said that there was "an ample supply of labor both for the army and for industry." (The Evening Telegram, New York, January 13, 1918.) Apparently, however, such official pronouncements must be taken with a grain of salt. 500 Immigration and Labor material was being produced. Influenced both by the patriotic motive and the desire for better wages, men and women left their homes and traveled to distant cities. This movement of the workers was acceler- ated by the action of employers who, not content with elaborate news- paper advertisements offering high rates of wages, even went as far as to send labor scouts all over the country. Both of these practices had to be curtailed by the government when toward the end of the war the competition for men became fiercer than ever and the U. S. Employment Service was organized in an effort to control the situation. . . . Workers not only left their homes but they changed from one in- dustry to another with a freedom never before known. General wage levels were a matter of common knowledge. And the worker knew not only the pay of men in his own industry but also that of workers in many other trades. 1 According to scholastic theory, "with employers com- peting more eagerly to get workmen, with the better em- ployers ready to pay appreciably higher wages than before, with resident laborers not subject to fresh competition from abroad, the time is ripe for a real increase of wages." 2 Did this ideal combination of economic factors during the late war actually produce the "salutary effects" anticipated by the Commission on Industrial Relations? Applying the standard chosen by the Commission, viz., the rise of the wage scale apace with food prices, we find that the purchasing power of union wages considerably declined dur- ing the war, as shown in Table 135. A painstaking study of the movement of real wages gauged by retail prices of food has been made by Professor Douglas 1 Alexander M. Bing, War-time Strikes, pp. 196-197. According to a special study of mobility of labor made by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics for the decade 1910-1919, "each year, on the average, the number of persons who quit, who were laid off or were discharged, as well as the number who had to be hired, was much larger than the total number of workers on the force at any one time." During the period from the entrance of the United States into the war, to the armis- tice (i.e., from May, 1917, to October, 1918), the monthly mobility rates were far above the average. ' ' Mobility of Labor in American Industry, ' ' by Paul F. Brissenden and Emil Frankel: Monthly Labor Review, June, 1920, pp. 41-43. "Hourwich's Immigration and Labor," by Robert F. Foerster: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1913, p. 668. The Lessons of the War 501 TABLE 135. PURCHASING POWER OF UNION WAGE RATES, MEASURED BY RETAIL PRICES OF FOOD, 1913-19! 8. 1 Year Per hour Per week 1913 100 100 1914 ioo 99 1915 101 101 1916 94 93 1917 78 77 1918 79 77 and Miss Lamberson. They have arrived at the following conclusions concerning the effects of the war upon the con- dition of the American wage worker: All the evidence seems to indicate that at the termination of the great war the return in commodities which the American workman received for an equal length of time worked (one hour) was from 7 to 17 per cent less than it was before the sharp, upward movement of prices in 1916. The purchasing power of the established week's work, moreover, was from 10 to 20 per cent less than in 1915. American labor, as a whole, therefore, cannot legitimately be charged with having prof- iteered during the war. Rather, like Alice in Wonderland, it was compelled to run faster in order to stay in the same place. 2 The material for these conclusions was taken from the wage statistics of ten leading industries. The authors, there- fore, caution the reader against generalization from their re- sults without certain reservations, of which the following are the most important : 1 Monthly Labor Review, March, 1919, p. 120. The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics has expressed the view that union rates of wages are merely minimum rates and that in practice union workers earn more than that minimum. Other students, however, take the opposite view. "The union rates of pay are the so-called minimum rates. As a matter of experience, however, these minimum rates are usually the prevailing rates." Hugh S. Hanna and W. Jett Lauck: Wages and War, p. 2. This view is concurred in by Mr. Bing, an em- ployer of labor, of large business experience, who served the govern- ment during the war. Bing, loc. tit., p. 196. 2 "The Movement of Real Wages," by Paul H. Douglas and Frances Lamberson : The A merican Economic Review, September, 1 92 1 , pp. 425- 426. 502 Immigration and Labor The industries covered do not include such war-time industries as munitions plants. Some of the occupations within these industries enjoyed increases in wages more than sufficient to compensate for the increase in the cost of living. On the other hand, neither are the rail- road workers and the coal miners included, and their wages notoriously lagged behind the increase in prices. Farm laborers also lost during the war period. 1 Still, in recent studies of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, and in the compilations of the National Industrial Conference Board, retail prices of food alone have been con- sidered unsatisfactory as a measure of the cost of living, inasmuch as they do not reflect the changes in other items of the family budget, notably rent. 2 The adequacy of other standards, however, has likewise been questioned. 3 Profes- sor Litman, in his study of prices during the war, comes to the following conclusions: As to any definite conclusions regarding increased cost of living and the effect of this increase upon the status of the workingman and his family, one may subscribe without reservation to the statements of 1 "The Movement of Real Wages,'' by Paul H. Douglas and Frances Lamberson: The American Economic Review, September, 1921, pp. 421- 422. According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average cost of housing for thirty-two cities showed practically no change from 1913 to the end of 1917; in December, 1918, it increased 9.2 per cent from the 1913 average. The increase in rents came as the after- math of the war. Monthly Labor Review, July, 1921, p. 112. * "At the present time, index numbers of the cost of living, like all other index numbers, are still in the experimental stage of development. They cannot yet be considered instruments of precision like thermome- ters or micrometer calipers. And no one is at this time justified in sit- ting with an eye peeled on the index number of the cost of living and measuring its movement in one direction or another, and believing that whatever the index registers is above question or criticism. For retail price quotations of standardized goods and services are not easy to collect, and when one index number is compared with another, small but not unimportant discrepancies frequently appear. . . . They are due to differences in the manner of collecting price quotations, in the instructions to enumerators, in the training and judgment of the enumerators, and in the kinds of goods and services that are included in the survey by each agency." Leo Wolman: "The Cost of Living and Wage Cuts," The New Republic, July 27, 1921. The Lessons of the War 503 the United States Commissioner of Labor Statistics, that after all these years of investigation and statistical toil in the cost-of-living field, we don't know clearly the difference between the higher cost of living and the cost of higher living. 1 Yet, after a careful examination of all available data, Pro- fessor Litman cautiously concludes that "it does not seem that wages rose as rapidly as the prices of commodities. 2 This view is concurred in by those who speak for organized labor. The following is from Prof. Lauck's statement be- fore the United States Railroad Labor Board, quoted on a previous page: An examination of the experience of every industry shows, practi- cally without exception, that wage increases have lagged behind price increases, and usually very far behind. . . . They [the workers] have merely struggled as best they could and in the only way they could to keep their old standards of living. In this struggle they have met with only very partial success. For the great body of wage earners, wages have not kept step with prices. As a result, labor as a class is now worse off than it was before the war. Almost without exception a day's wage buys less than it did in 1912 to 1914. In other words, in the distribution of the income of the country, labor is receiving a smaller proportion than it did before the war, while capital in the form of profits, interest, and rent is receiving a very much larger pro- portion. 3 On the other hand, the same statistical material leads Pro- fessor Friday to the opposite conclusion, viz., "that the real wages of labor have risen, and are higher to-day than they were in 1914." 4 But at the end of the same chapter, he qualifies this general statement as follows: There are so many different kinds of labor, so many different kinds of wage payment, and so many different rates of pay, that the task of obtaining a general view of the course of wages is considered by experts to be one of the most difficult and complicated scientific undertakings 1 Simon Litman: Prices and Price Control in Great Britain and the United States During the World War, p. 201. 2 Ibid., p. 197. 3 Loc. cit., p. 5. * Friday: Profits, Wages, and Prices, p. 107. 504 Immigration and Labor in the whole field of economics Consequently all general statementa regarding wages, of which many are always appearing in print and on the platform, should be accepted with extreme caution. 1 His own computation of the increase in wage rates and employment of from ten to twelve million workers shows that the yearly earnings per employee increased from 1913 to 1917 slightly over 30 per cent, 2 whereas it appears from other sources that the cost of living during the same period increased 42 per cent. 3 The most conclusive corroboration of the decline in real wages is furnished by the investigations of the Bureau of Child Hygiene of New York City, which show a decided in- crease of the proportion of malnourished school children dur- ing the World War. The figures are presented in Table 136. TABLE 136. PROPORTION OF MALNOURISHED SCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN, NEW YORK CITY. 4 Year Per cent I9H 5 1915 6 1916 12 1917 21 This condition was not peculiar to New York City only. Dr. Thomas D. Wood, in an address delivered before the National Council of Education, February 28, 1918, estimated "that between 15 and 25 per cent of our school children are undernourished." 5 ^ Was this lagging of wages behind the advancing cost of living due to the failure of the wage workers to "insist" upon a higher rate of wagesto put it in the language of the eco- 1 Friday: Profits, Wages, and Prices, pp. no-ill. 8 Ibid., p. 122. ' Monthly Labor Bulletin, February, 19*1, p. 61. 4 "What Is Malnutrition?" by Lydia Roberts. Children's Bureau, Publication No. 59, p. 7. 1 Ibid. t pp. 7, 19. The Lessons of the War 505 nomic experts of the Immigration Commission? The statis- tics of strikes during the world war prove that labor did not submissively acquiesce in the terms offered to it by employers. In the period from 1881 to 1905 there occurred on an aver- age 1,532 strikes a year. During the three years 1916-1918 the number of strikes averaged more than twice as many, viz., 3,697. The annual average number of strikers during the decade, preceding the predominance of the "new immi- gration" was 267,000, and in the first decade of its ascend- ancy 344, ooo. 1 During the years 1916-1918, the annual average number of strikers rose to i,3io,ooo, 2 i.e., 391 per cent above the average of 1886-1895, whereas the num- ber of persons engaged in manufacturing and mechanical pursuits, trade, and transportation, increased from the X. to the XIII. Census (1880-1910) only 208 per cent. 3 Nor were those strikes unorganized outbursts of inarticulate dis- content. The percentage of strikes in which the workers were members of unions rose from 82 in 1915 to 90 in 1917, and remained at 83 in 1918. 4 Moreover, strikes were not the only means by which labor was able to assert its claims: During the war the principle of collective bargaining was of necessity, albeit in many cases rather grudgingly, recognized by all employers engaged on direct government work or in the production of essentials. The Quartermaster Corps, the Ordnance Office, the Emergency Fleet Corporation of the Shipping Board, the National War Labor Board, the Fuel Administration, and many other government agencies, sought to secure greater and more continuous production by means of collective agreements covering wages. 5 1 See Table 104, on p. 345. 2 Alexander M. Bing: War-time Strikes, pp. 292-293. 3 XIII. Census Reports, vol. iv, p. 41. * Bing, loc. cit., p. 297. 5 Royal Meeker, Commissioner of Labor Statistics: "Employees Representation in Management of Industry," Monthly Labor Review, February, 1920, p. 2. 506 Immigration and Labor Neither could the presence of the "un-Americanized" for- eign worker serve as an explanation for the decline of real wages. It has been brought out, on the basis of the calcula- tions of the Bureau of Applied Economics, that whereas the real wages of common laborers in the iron and steel industry of whom 64 per cent are foreign born have gone up, those of locomotive firemen of whom 84 per cent are native-born Americans have declined to a point 31 per cent below "the minimum budget under American standards." 1 Among the potent factors in the decline of real wages must be noted the movement of labor from agriculture to urban industries in response to the attraction of higher wages. In consequence, agricultural production during the war barely kept pace with the growth of population, 2 while the demand for breadstuff s was increased by exports abroad, as indicated in Table 137. The great interests which control TABLE 137. WHEAT PRODUCED, EXPORTED, AND RETAINED FOR CONSUMPTION, FISCAL YEARS I9II-I9I8. 3 Millions of bushels Years end< ;d June 30 Increase (+) or decrease ( ) 1911-1914 1915-1918 Per cent Produced l 2 7 en 3IQO -1- 16 Exported, domestic 2 4,-ie OI "? -j-IIQ Domestic, retained for consumption. . . 2,315 2,275 2 Per cent exported 16 2O * The production is of the calendar year preceding the fiscal year 1 including wheat flour reduced to wheat. the agricultural produce market were thereby enabled to raise the prices of food. What the wage earner gained in 1 Editorial in The New Republic, February 25, 1920, p. 373. XIII. Census Reports, vol. iv, Table VI: Laborers in blast furnaces and steel rolling mills, iron foundries, and other iron and steel factories; loco- motive firemen (computed). 9 See Diagram XXIX. 8 Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1918, p. 559. For statistics of exports of other breadstuffs, see Appendix, Table XXXIII. The Lessons of the War 507 money wages, he was forced to surrender in the higher prices of necessities of life. This fact is established by Prof. Wesley C. Mitchell's study of prices during the war, from which Table 138 is compiled. TABLE 138. INDEX NUMBERS OF THE YEARLY PRODUCTION AND PRICES OF VEGETABLE PRODUCTS, 1913-1918. l Years Production Prices] 1913 100 100 1914 106 95 1915 112 98 1916 100 in 1917 107 173 1918 106 191 The next question to be considered is, What were the sub- stitutes for immigrant labor during the war years? The movement of workers from agriculture to urban industries has already been referred to. It struck the public eye in the migration of Negroes from the agricultural South to the industrial East and Middle West. The volume of that migration is officially estimated at from 400,000 to 500,000. "Shortage of labor in Northern industries" is given as "the direct cause of the increased Negro migration during the war period." "The agricultural regions of the Southern states began to suffer for want of the Negro worker." 2 1 "History of Prices During the War," by Wesley C. Mitchell: W. I. B. Price Bulletin No. I, p. 45. "In vegetable husbandry the harvest depends partly upon the acreage sown, which the farmer can control, but quite as much upon the weather. Thus the annual supply of veg- etable products increased in the dull year 1914 and increased largely again in 1915. Nineteen sixteen was a bad year, and all the efforts to encourage agriculture in 1917 and 1918 did not bring the harvests close to the 1915 record." (Ibid., p. 46.) 2 ' ' The Negro at Work During the World War ' ' : Department of Labor Division of Negro Economics, George E. Haynes, Director. Second Study on Negro Labor, p. 10. See also: Emmett J. Scott: Negro Mi- gration During the War, pp. 3, 14. According to a preliminary state- ment issued by the Bureau of the Census, the Negro population of Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana decreased from 1910 to 1920 by 142,598. On the other hand, of the total numerical increase in the Negro population of the United States during that de- 508 Immigration and Labor Another substitute for immigrant labor was found in the employment of women. The statistics on the subject are scattered in government publications. An illustration is fur- nished by the Annual Report of the Director-General of Rail- roads for 1919, from which we learn that in October, 1918, the number of women employed on tbe railroads had in- creased, from the entrance of the United States into the war, by about 70,000, which represented an addition of 225 per cent. 1 The increased employment of children in industry during the war emergency was still another substitute for immigrant labor. The subject is dealt with in a report of the Children's Bureau, from which the following is condensed : By the latter part of 1915 the effect of foreign orders for war goods was beginning to make itself felt in the increased employment of chil- dren. Beginning with the autumn of 1915 an unprecedented rise began in the number of children entering gainful employment, and heavy in- creases were practically everywhere recorded for 1916 and 1917, even before the United States entered the war. After the entrance of the United States into the war the number of children taking out employ- ment certificates continued to rise. The forces at work pushing chil- dren into industry included the growing cost of the necessities of life com- bined, in many cases, with the absence on military duty of members of the family who had previously contributed to its support. High wages offered by employers hard pressed for help proved a powerful magnet, drawing into business and industry many children under sixteen who in normal times would have remained in school. In several cities the increase in 1918 was so striking as to arrest attention even in that year of generally large increases. In Washington, D. C., there was an in- crease of more than 163 per cent in 1917-18 (July 1st to June 3Oth) over 1916-17. In Louisville, Kentucky, there was an increase in 1918 of 52 per cent, following an increase in 1917 of 174 per cent, so that the cade, 69 per cent took place in the North, although its Negro popula- tion in 1920 was only 14 per cent of the total for the United States. In several of the Northern states the rates were extraordinarily large, e.g., in Pennsylvania, 46.7 per cent; in Ohio, 67.1 per cent; in Michi- gan, 251 per cent; in Illinois, 67.1 per cent. 1 Monthly Labor Review. March, 1920, p. 156 The Lessons of the War 509 number of children receiving employment certificates was in 1918 over four times as great as in 1916. In Philadelphia an increase of 82 per cent in 1917 was followed by a still further increase of 15 per cent in 1918. It should be kept in mind that the figures here given relate only to children legally certificated, and give no indication of the numbers going to work without complying with the law. Reports from labor commissioners and factory inspectors indicated the difficulty experi- enced during the war years in adequately administering child-labor laws. Parents and children, tempted by the high wages offered the children at a time when the excessive cost of living presented a serious problem, would connive at evasions of the law in order to have the chil- dren work in factories and munitions plants. In Philadelphia violations of the child-labor law were four times as great in 1917 as in 1916. In inspections made by the Children's Bureau of sixty-three shipyards where steel ships were being built, approximately 60 per cent of the children found at work who claimed to be sixteen and were without certificates were actually only fourteen or fifteen years of age. The reply of the Assistant Secretary of the Industrial Commission of Wis- consin to an inquiry sent out in 1918 by the Children's Bureau in regard to this subject pointed out the fact that "The general effect of the war upon the enforcement of the child-labor law has been to increase the difficulty of enforcing the law. The scarcity of adult labor has made the employer more ready to take minors into his employ. Many em- ployers now employ children who have never done so before to any extent." x What is the lesson that can be drawn from the experience gained in the late war? Amidst the present industrial crisis one must not lose sight of the fact that this is but one of the cyclical disturbances of the capitalistic system which will be followed by resumption of "business as usual." There will be profits which will seek investment in new fields. Prior to the war most of that surplus was applied to the expansion of American industry, which created a demand for immigrant labor. If restriction of immigration is to become the per- manent policy of the United States, our recent war experience does not warrant the assumption that the resulting scarcity of labor will inure to the benefit of the American wage worker. 1 "Trend of Child Labor in the United States, 1913-1920," by Nettie McGill. Monthly Labor Review, April, 1921, pp. 6-10. Immigration and Labor It seems likely that the restriction of immigration of labor from Europe will lead to emigration of American capital to Europe. That this is not mere speculation, appears from an official report of the Commercial Secretary of the British Embassy in Berlin, who states that arrangements have been in progress between American capitalists and German corporations, look- ing toward the investment of American capital in German industry. The electrical and textile industries and shipping are mentioned. 1 The decline of real wages during the late war is merely a repetition of the story of the Civil War; the cause of it has been stated in a previous chapter. 2 The bargaining power of the wage earner does not extend to the market in which he appears as a consumer. Advances in wages come as a result of the slow process of collective bargaining, involving the use of the cumbersome machinery of arbitration, with occasional resort to industrial warfare, whereas the prices of commodities consumed by the wage earner are controlled by monopolistic combinations, which promptly add every ad- 1 General Report on the Industrial and Economic Situation in Germany in December, 1920, p. 6. Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty. London, 1921. In a press dispatch cabled from Paris under date of September n, 1921, it was reported that an agreement was signed between representatives of a big American syndicate and the Archduke Frederick of Austria and his family, by which the syndicate took over the whole of the Archduke's estates in the dismembered Austrian Empire. These estates include the rich steel works and mines at Teschen, vast forest lands stretching across many miles of several new Central European republics, farms, factories, etc. The value of the property is conservatively estimated at $200,000,000. In the syn- dicate which is taking the control of this property are mentioned names prominent in American financial circles. The negotiations began in the summer of 1919. An arrangement was made in October, 1919, whereby the Archduke was to transfer his various properties and in- terests to a corporation which was then organized in Switzerland. The deal involves litigation in the courts of the new republics, and ex- premier Viviani of France is reported to have been retained as counsel to represent the claims of the Austrian Archduke before the League of Nations. * See p. 306. The Lessons of the War 511 vance in wages to the market price of the finished product. 1 Thus the raise of wages of one group of workers is in effect charged up to the working class as a whole. The leak is in the control of prices. The government, dur- ing the war, assumed the authority to regulate prices, but it delegated this authority to representatives of the interests which were to be regulated. 2 The profiteering which resulted from the methods of price control adopted by the various war agencies, was exposed in a report submitted by the Federal Trade Commission to the Senate in the summer of 1918. The profits assured to the big interests were "enor- mous ... far beyond anything that was necessary to keep men in industry and to stimulate their initiative and enter- prise." 3 What is wanted in order to secure to the worker a real advance in wages, is regulation of profits in the interest of the consumers, of whom the wage earners constitute the most numerous single group. Restriction of the supply of labor does not touch the prob- lem of price control. Immigration laws can prevent the American capitalist from employing foreign labor in the United States. But with the present rates of exchange he may find it as profitable to employ the same labor in Europe in the manufacture of goods for the world market. The re- duction of the supply of labor will be met by a reduction of the demand for labor. Restriction of immigration will merely speed the advance of financial imperialism. 1 "Wage earners, as soon as they could make their economic demands felt, thereupon received wage increases so that they might in a measure cope with the advance in the cost of living. This meant increased labor costs to the producers and middlemen, and they instantly advanced prices again. Almost without exception, these price advances were out of all proportion to the increase in labor costs. This necessitated further wage increases to labor, and we find the vicious circle established, with the profiteers invariably in command of the situation." "Profiteers," by W. Jett Lauck: The Socialist Review, July, 1920, p. 52. 1 "Most of the important positions in the Food Administration were entrusted to successful organizers and administrators of private busi- ness enterprises." Litman: loc. cit., p. 211. * Friday: loc. cit., p. 155. Appendix IN ANSWER TO CRITICS 1 THE first edition of this book was attacked by two authors of books on immigration. This record of the critics calls for an examination of their objections. Prof. Fairchild goes at it with the habits acquired in mark- ing examination papers. It could not escape his trained eye that the name of Prof. Willcox was misspelled (with one "1" instead of two). The error is repentantly admitted, and has been corrected in the present edition. He is less fortunate, however, in other attempts of a similar kind. Thus he finds fault with the remark in the footnote on p. 60 that the con- clusion of the Immigration Commission that "'the employ- ment of the wife, or keeping boarders or lodgers, is less fre- quent among the native-born of foreign father' ... is de- rived from the reports in just four families, whose heads are native-born of foreign father." He has taken the pains to look up the reference, and announces to have found that there were 26 such families instead of 4. Examination of Table 44, on p. 310 of the volume quoted shows, however, in the column headed "number of wives having employment or keeping boarders or lodgers," exactly 4 such wives. As there is, presumably, one wife to each family, this is equiva- lent to four families. The critic has evidently been misled by the figure 26, which is shown in another column headed "number of selected families," for the "total native-born of selected families." This desire to pick flaws reaches a climax on p. 762 of Prof. Fairchild's review. In Table 8 the author has copied from the Reports of the Immigration Commission, the sta- 1 Henry Pratt Fairchild, in The National Municipal Review, vol. ii, (1913)- Robert F. Foerster, in The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1913. Appendix tistics of the movement of third-class passengers between the United States and European ports during the calendar years 1899-1909. The number of west-bound passengers is reported to have fallen from 1,378,000 in 1907, to 420,000 in 1908, which shows a decline of 058,000-, the net immigration, i.e., the excess of east-bound over west-bound passengers for the year 1908, is 237,000. These figures are commented upon by the author as follows : During the industrial crisis of 1908, immigration dropped at once nearly a million, compared with the high-water mark of the previous year. . . . The result was a net loss of nearly a quarter of a million through emigration (p. 92). Prof. Fairchild has not troubled himself to look at Table 8, instead of which he has made a computation of his own from some other source he does not take the reader into his secret and has obtained the figures 859,642 and 41,198, re- spectively, instead of those commented upon by the author. On this ground the author is charged with "intent to mis- lead." The American academic world prides itself upon its "catholicity": there are two sides to every question, etc. But, when met by heterodox opinion, the priest of the Tem- ple of Wisdom loses his scholarly poise and falls into the ways of the vulgus profanum. Concerning the merits of the criticisms, it must be noted that both reviewers reject the statistical method of treat- ment of the subject of immigration. Prof. Fairchild exhorts against "the besetting sin of the professional statistician, the assumption that nothing is true which cannot be proved by statistics" (p. 763). He is seconded by Dr. Foerster, who believes that "we must go heavily armed with hypotheses. . . . For to-day [he says] guarded deductive reasoning is in- dispensable, and often by appropriate tests is found valid" (pp. 670, 671). It will be remembered that a Commission was appointed by Congress to investigate the immigration question, and Appendix 517 that after nearly three years of study the Commission brought out a report recommending restriction of immigration, in support of which it presented many volumes of statistical material. This evidence is ruled out by the learned econo- mists, who prefer to go back to deductive reasoning and hypotheses. Is it because they realize that the truth of the conclusions of the Commission "cannot be proved by sta- tistics ' ' ? Still, since other university professors who directed its investigations tried to prove the case for restriction of immigration by statistical evidence, it was incumbent upon the negative side to show that their statistics had failed to establish the truth of their contentions. Let us consider, however, whether deductive reasoning would do better than the inductive method. The prerequisite for the application of the deductive method is the existence of axioms and postulates based upon common observation of facts. In pure mathematics these facts are few and sim- ple, and are within the daily experience of every person. Economic science, on the contrary, deals with a great num- ber of complex phenomena which are not within the knowl- edge of everybody. The so-called deductive Political Econ- omy is in reality also based upon observed facts, but the field of observation is confined to the narrow environment of the scholar. A pertinent illustration is the theory of wages to which both reviewers swear allegiance, viz., that the de- mand for labor at periods of shortage of labor "must of necessity have raised the wages of laborers already in the country, if the foreign sources of supply had been cut off." l The experience of labor in the late war, as well as in the Civil War, has discredited this theory. Mere facts, however, have no place in the speculative theory of the reviewers. What importance can it have says Dr. Foerster to ask whether wages in an immigrant occupation are higher or lower now than they once were? Legislators must ask, how does unrestricted immigration affect wages (p. 658). 1 Fairchild, loc. cit., p. 760. See also Foerster, loc. cit n p. 668. 518 Appendix Obviously he thinks that that question can be answered by intuition, without a comparative study of the actual ratfes of wages. Economists have not agreed, however, upon the premises from which the legislators could readily deduce an answer satisfactory to Dr. Foerster. Prof. Commons, who made a study of immigration for President McKinley's Industrial Commission, reached the conclusion that immi- grants come in response to demand for labor, which is de- pendent upon industrial expansion, and that when the ex- pansion of industry is strong, "there is no overcrowding of the labor market" and "the new labor as well as the existing labor may secure advances in wages" (see pp. 114, 302). In order to answer Dr. Foerster's hypothetical question, the legislators must therefore first ascertain the following facts : (1) Is American industry expanding fast enough to create a demand for immigrant labor or, on the contrary, is there an overcrowding of the labor market ? (2) Has immigrant labor, as well as native labor, actually secured advances in wages, or has immigration retarded the advance of wages ? Answers to these questions imply that very "historical comparison" which is spurned by Dr. Foerster (p. 657). He claims that the Immigration Commission attempted to study the movement of wages in connection with immigra- tion, and indulges in the following speculation: If wages declined as immigrants entered a field and underbid the workers, that would presumably prove that immigration lowers wages" (p. 658). This hypothesis merely proves that Dr. Foerster speaks of the reports of the Immigration Commission without hav- ing familiarized himself with them. The Commission never attempted a historical study of wages, nor has it proved Dr. Foerster's hypothesis. The burden of proof is obviously on the restrictionist, who contends- that contemporary immi- gration is responsible for low wages. The author's task has been purely negative, to show the lack of evidence to support Appendix 519 the contentions of the restrictionists. How was he to go about it? We are taught by Dr. Foerster that "wherever wages change we must note what else characteristically changes" (p. 670). In conformity with this rule, the author compared the wages of immigrant and native railway men for a number of years. Census statistics of wages in manu- factures were compared by states in parallel columns with percentages of foreign-born. If wag;es declined as immi- grants entered a field, states with a large percentage of immigrants would show lower average earnings than those with a smaller percentage of immigrants. Likewise, the movement of wages of railway employees for a period of years would show a greater advance in those occupations in which native Americans predominate than in those in which immigrants are employed. This is, however, not the case. Both reviewers find fault with the author for making com- parisons of money wages "without reference to the relative cost of living." That the author is fully aware of this factor the reader can see from the following sentence, appearing on p. 294: "A rise or a fall in money wages is no indication of an increase or decrease of the resources of the wage-earners, unless coupled with comparative statistics of the cost of living." But when the movement of wages is compared by occupations for a number of years, the change in the cost of living affects all workers alike and may, therefore, be elim- inated. The defects of our statistics of the cost of living do not permit of a thoroughgoing comparison of real wages over different sections of the country. But, relying upon Dr. Hearing's conclusion in hi's Wages in ike United States, "that average wages are rather constant for\ given industry from state to state," we may properly infer that the cost of living must likewise vary but little from state to state. From such data as are available, it does not appear that immigration has had a depressing effect upon real wages. In the woolen mills, "since the immigrants from southern and Eastern Europe and Asiatic Turkey have begun to enter 52O Appendix the unskilled occupations in large numbers, the percentage of increase in the wages of unskilled operatives has been greater than the percentage of increase in the rates of skilled workers, who are practically all of the English-speaking races" (p. 390). Mr. Fitch, in his study of the steel workers for the Pittsburgh Survey, has brought out the fact that the wages of the unskilled immigrants have kept pace with the cost of living, whereas the wages of the skilled native workers have been reduced (see pp. 404-409). Comparisons of the standard of living of the workers at different periods be- ginning with 1800 show a decided improvement of the con- dition of labor, going parallel with immigration (see pp. 295-297). This was, of course, due to the industrial progress of the country, in which the workers had a share. Prof. Fairchild thinks that, with the wonderful development of industry in the United States, the share of the workers should have been larger if it had not been for the influx of immigrants. But this is begging the question. He cites the example of Germany, where the expansion of industry improved the condition of labor, and asks why it has not had the same effect in the United States, the infer- ence being that in the United States the advancement of labor was retarded by immigration. He overlooks, however, the fact that the period of German industrial expansion was also a period of immigration of Polish and Italian workers to Germany. Thus improvement of the condition of labor came along with immigration. But, cleverly interjects Dr. Foerster, if statistics "really prove that heavy immigration does not hurt the terms of employment of labor, then they also prove that such immi- gration betters the terms of employment" (p. 662). He assumes that because a certain proposition is true, the con- verse proposition, too, must be true. Perhaps, however, one must not expect from an economic scholar a familiarity with Euclid's rules of deductive reasoning. From an economic point of view immigration is merely a movement of labor to the market where there is a demand Appendix 521 for it, precisely as the movement from the country to the city. Immigration to the United States supplied the un- skilled labor which was wanted by the rapidly expanding American industries. The expansion of industry created a lively demand for skilled workers, as well as many positions of a supervisory character these positions were filled by native workers and older immigrants. To this extent im- migration indirectly did better their terms of employment. This tendency has been recognized by the experts of the Immigration Commission (see p. 163). On the other hand, reduction of the supply of labor, in- stead of raising wages, may react upon the demand for labor. A demonstration was furnished by the "non-essential" in- dustries during the late war. The supply of foreign labor was cut off, shortage of labor necessitated the suspension of building activities, with the result that whereas from 1897 to 1917 relative full-time weekly earnings in the building trades had grown faster than the average for ten leading industries, in 1918 they fell behind the average. 1 The after- effect of the suspension of building operations has been the present housing crisis, which has raised the cost of shelter 58 per cent since the armistice. 2 This is tantamount to a reduction of the real wages of the working class, as a whole, for the benefit of the landlord class. Deductive reasoning proves as fallacious in relation to the problem of unemployment. Prof. Fairchild rules out all the evidence disproving the hypothesis that immigration is responsible for unemployment. It is wrong to assume, he thinks, that the effects of immigration upon the labor market must manifest themselves immediately; they may be cumu- lative, and will tell a few years later, during a period of in- dustrial depression. Indeed, inasmuch as over five million immigrants were admitted to the United States within the 1 Douglas and Lamberson, loc. cit. t Table IV. 2 Changes in Cost of Living and Prices. Bureau of Applied Economics. Bulletin No. 6, Addendum, September 25, 1920. (Estimate of the National Industrial Conference Board.) 522 Appendix past ten years, and there are to-day over five million un- employed in this country, is it not self-evident that had those five million aliens been kept out, there would be a job for everybody in this country to-day? Yet on the other hand, Australia, with a total population of five millions to a continent as large as the United States, and without immi- gration, has also known unemployment on a scale as large in proportion as the state of New York. Prof. Fairchild dismisses this argument "without opinion," to use a legal phrase. The fallacy of his interpretation of cyclical unem- ployment lies in the ready assumption that unemployment is the result of an excessive supply of labor, whereas, to quote Mr. Beveridge, "it depends upon the nature of the demand for labor, not upon the volume of the whole supply" (see Chapter VI). The advocates of restriction of immigra- tion overlook the fact that parallel with the immigration of labor to the United States prior to the war there was going on an immigration of European capital to the United States. It was estimated that the total amount of European capital invested in permanent securities and loans in the United States was approximately $6, 500,000,000. l This was equal to about 14 per cent of the total capital invested in American industries (exclusive of agriculture). 2 The foreign-born non- agricultural population constituted about the same percen- tage of the total non-agricultural population of the United States. 3 In other words, European capital came together 1 George Paish, The Trade Balance of the United States, pp. 174, 175. (Senate Document 579, Sixty-first Congress, 2d Session.) 1 The wealth invested in mines and quarries, factory land and im- provements, manufacturing machinery, products of mining and manu- facturing in stock, steam railroads, canals and shipping, telegraphs, telephones, street railways, central electric light and power stations, private waterworks, and other business property, was estimated for 1904 at $46,900,000,000. Wealth, Debt, and Taxation (Bureau of Cen- sus), pp. 12, 17, 22, 27. 8 The proportion of foreign-born among the farmers in the United States was 13.2 per cent in 1900 (Occupations at the XII. Census, Table XXXVI., p. cxiii.), i.e. t approximately the same as among the popula- tion at large. Appendix 523 with European labor to assist in the development of American industry. The Immigration Commission contended that there was, nevertheless, an oversupply of unskilled labor due to immi- gration. The guiding idea of its report is the belief that native Americans and older immigrant workers had been displaced by recent immigrants. In support of this theory the Commission quoted census statistics for the decade 1890- 1900. On closer examination, however, the figures of the censuses of 1890 and 1900 proved quite the opposite of what the Commission intended to prove. Yet Prof. Fairchild would not give up a hypothesis merely for want of facts to support it. The decade 1890-1900, he objects, is incon- clusive, because it was a period of light immigration, but if the author had consulted the figures of the XIII. Census, which followed a decade of heavy immigration, they would tell another story. Regardless of the general rule that the burden of proof is not on the negative, but on the affirmative in the present case, upon that side which affirms the theory of "racial displacement" it is characteristic of Prof. Fair- child's easy methods of reasoning that at the time he made this guess the occupation statistics of the XIII. Census had not yet been published, so he manifestly did not know what they would show. The present writer was not satisfied, however, to rest his conclusions on the period relied upon by the Immigration Commission, but, anticipating such hypothetical objections as those of Prof. Fairchild, he perused the report of the Massachusetts state census of 1905, which showed "no ma- terial change in the make-up of the industrial forces during the first five years of the present century" (see p. 176). The years 1900-1905 were marked by heavy immigration; the total for the five-year period, 3,841,646, exceeded the total for the previous decade; 1 the net immigration for the five calendar years 1900-1904, preceding the Massachusetts state census, was nearly equal to the net immigration for the 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. i, pp. 56, 57. 524 Appendix next five years, 1905-1909, preceding the XIII. Census of the United States (see Table 8, on p. 90) ; Massachusetts is one of the states with a large immigrant population. In the absence of any data to the contrary, the results of the Massachusetts census could properly be accepted as an indi- cation that the data for 1890-1900 still held good in 1910. The XIII. Census report on occupations was subsequently published in an uncompleted form, with a new classification which rendered its figures non-comparable with those of the preceding censuses. Another of the popular myths related to the subject of labor supply is the alleged "stimulation" of immigration. The author has quoted the statement of the Immigration Commission that "owing to the rigidity of the law and the fact that special provision is made for its enforcement, there are probably at the present time relatively few actual con- tract laborers admitted." This does not satisfy Prof. Fair- child. He insinuates that the author has deliberately omitted other qualifying statements of the Commission. He quotes a sentence to the effect that "a very large number . . . come in response to indirect assurance that employment awaits them" (which, as a matter of fact, he could have found on p. 94 of this book, reproduced in almost identical language from another page of the same volume). He further quotes the opinion of the Commission that "it is certain that Euro- pean immigrants, and particularly those from southern and eastern Europe, are, under a literal construction of the law, for the most part contract laborers" (p. 761). He is not dis- turbed by the glaring contradiction between this conclusion and the other that "owing to the rigidity of the law" and its effective enforcement there are "few actual contract laborers admitted." He fails to perceive the distinction between a statement of facts and a conclusion, and is apparently un- familiar with the time-honored rule of evidence that one may accept the testimony of witnesses concerning facts, without accepting their conclusions from those facts. Closely connected with the subject of unemployment is Appendix 525 the effect of machinery upon the demand for labor. Here again deductive reasoning has failed our learned economists. Prof. Fairchild denies "the assumption (sic!) that labor- saving machinery supplants skilled labor to a much greater extent than unskilled labor" (p. 763). He is seconded by Dr. Foerster, who has picked out a number of exceptions, of which only one need be mentioned here: "The old cobbler was not superior to the worker in the modern shoe industry" (p. 665). He should brush up on his Taussig, where he will find the following: The cobbler of former days put together a shoe by himself; in a modern factory the shoe goes through some eighty different processes. . . . The machines now used . . . have extended the principle of the automatic repetition of identical movements to tasks long thought too intricate to be amenable to such methods. . . . The skillful work- man and the adaptable tool retain a large place in industry; but the range of their work tends to become more and more restricted. 1 This proposition has become a truism. The author has quoted a statement of Professors Jenks and Lauck which in- cidentally refers to the fact that "the invention of mechan- ical methods and processes" has resulted in the employment of "unskilled industrial workers as a substitute for the 1 Principles of Economics, by F. W. Taussig, vol. i, pp. 35-36. That the theory originated by Prof. Fairchild and Dr. Foerster had been unknown to their predecessors in the field of economics, appears from the following references: "The effect of improvements in machinery," according to an early writer, consists "in substituting one description of human labor for another the less skilled for the more skilled." Andrew Ure: The Philosophy of Manufactures, p. 321 (Third edition, London, 1861). "A factor that has had a real tendency to lower the actual average earnings of the wage-earner in many of the industries is the displacement of the skilled operative by machinery, which permits the substitution of a comparatively unskilled machine hand. This tendency is noticeable in many lines of industry." Twelfth Census, Manufactures, vol. i, p. 123. President McKinley's Industrial Commis- sion, discussing the effects of immigration upon wages, remarked that "machinery ... by displacing the skilled mechanic, makes room for the unskilled immigrant." Report of the Industrial Commission, vol. xv, p. xxiii. f 526 Appendix skilled operatives formerly required" (see p. 290). That in some cases the machine has substituted a new kind of skill for the old one, may be conceded. But the error is in the deductive reasoning from insufficient facts, which are gen- eralized out of all proportion to their real place in modern industry. If Dr. Foerster had taken note of the statistics compiled by Mr. Fitch in his study of the steel workers (reproduced in Table 121 of this book) he would realize that the skilled workers constitute only about one-sixth of the force of a modern steel plant, whereas more than three-fifths are unskilled laborers. Owing to his misconception of the effects of machinery he fails to "see that the introduction of new labor-saving machinery as a substitute for immigration would displace the skilled labor of the native American workers and reduce them to the condition of unskilled laborers (see Chapter XXIII). The contempt of both reviewers for facts is reflected in their judgments on every economic and social problem. Discrimination between recent immigrants from southern and eastern Europe and older immigrants from northern and western Europe, runs through the whole report of the Immigration Commission, yet Dr. Foerster wonders, are there really "persons who ask for restriction on the ground that former immigrants were 'more desirable' than the present ones"? (p. 658). He ridicules the idea that "a re- duction in the day's work, all other things being equal, pro- vides more days of work for every employee." Yet it is a fact that the American Federation of Labor has repeatedly urged the shortening of the work day on this very ground. 1 Prof. Fairchild, speaking of child labor, says: The only reasonable basis of comparison is the total number of chil- dren of the given ages in each nativity group in the country. If the author had made this comparison ... it would have appeared that nearly three times as large a percentage of all children of foreign parents, l See Report on Unemployment, by" John Koren, in "Waste in In- dustry," by The Committee on Elimination of Waste in Industry of the Federated Engineering Societies (1921), p. 296. Appendix 527 of the given ages, are employed in the specified occupations as children of native parents (p. 762). As a matter of fact, the author did make such a compari- son in Table 94, on p. 320, with the result that the percentage of children of foreign parents employed in manufactures was found to be exactly the same as that of children of native parents, and not "three times as large," as Prof. Fairchild imagines. Dr. Foerster interprets the employment of children in large numbers in the Southern mills as the effect of immi- gration. The Southern manufacturers are compelled to em- ploy children in order to meet the competition of the cheap immigrant labor of the North. Reference to Table 114 shows, however, that the average yearly earnings of adult males in the cotton mills of South Carolina were at the cen- sus of manufactures of 1905 about equal to the earnings of children in the cotton mills of Massachusetts ($244 and $233, respectively), and that the earnings of adult males in Pennsylvania were more than double the earnings of adult males in North and South Carolina. It was a case of the native Southerner underbidding the immigrant. The ab- sence of adequate laws against child labor in the South is thus obviously due to the demand for labor, not for cheap labor adult male labor is cheap enough in the South. In the Ncrth, too, child labor was employed in the early days of the cotton manufacturing industry; later, however, with the growth of immigration, the cotton mills secured a supply of adult labor which made it practicable to dispense with child labor (see Chapter XIV). In reference to pauperism, Dr. Fairchild boldly asserts that it would be difficult to find "statistics which would not go to show that the amount of pauperism among the foreign- born was vastly out of proportion to their total numbers in the population'' (p. 762). It does not matter that Tables 106- 109 do present such statistics, drawn from official sources, and that the Immigration Commission, though unfriendly to immigration, after an investigation which covered the activi- 528 Appendix ties of associated charities in forty-three cities, came to the conclusion that "the recent immigrants, even in cities in times of relative industrial inactivity, did not seek charitable assistance in any considerable numbers" (p. 354). A brief chapter has been devoted by the author to the refutation of Gen. Walker's theory that immigration has displaced millions of unborn Americans. To Prof. Fairchild's mind, however, the reiteration of Gen. Walker's hypothesis by other prominent writers (none of whom has contributed a single new fact in support of it) somehow vests it with added authority. Magister dixit. He is not disturbed by his own admission, in his book published a short time before, that "the proposition ... is absolutely incapable of mathe- matical proof." l To prove that the world-wide "volitional limitation of the family" has no relation to immigration to the United States, figures were quoted, in the first edition of this book, from Mr. Newsholme's The Declining Birth Rate, showing the num- ber of children born to an average family of the British aris- tocracy to have declined within half a century from 7 to 3.* The decline of the birth-rate among the upper classes of Eng- land led Prof. Karl Pearson to the following conclusions: The mentally better stock in the nation is not reproducing itself at the same rate as of old. . . . For the last forty years the intellectual classes of the nation, enervated by wealth or by love of pleasure, or following an erroneous standard of life, have ceased to give in due pro- portion the men wanted to carry on the ever-growing work of the Empire. 8 Still, if facts do not count with Prof. Fairchild against a preconceived idea backed up by authorities, the authority of Prof. Willcox, ranged on the opposite side of the question, 1 Henry Pratt Fairchild: Immigration^ pp. 341-342. * These statistics have since been superseded by a nation-wide inves- tigation, the results of which are quoted in the present edition. ' Quoted in the first edition, p. 226, from The Declining Birth Rate, by Arthur Newsholme, pp. 42-43. Appendix 529 ought to have appealed to him. That he has not a word to say about Prof. Willcox's arguments, although he has noticed the wrong spelling of Prof. Willcox's name, is ground for suspicion that he did not read the chapter on Race Suicide, and based his peremptory judgment on the brief summary on p. 18. Verily, there are none so blind as those who would not see. Appendix Note to page 499. IMPORTATION OF MEXICAN CONTRACT-LABORERS. Under the departmental regulations, Mexican contract laborers are admitted on the express condition that they will remain at work with the employer by whom they were imported. If a contract laborer de- serts his employer and attempts to seek work elsewhere, he is to be deported from the United States. There is a possibility that a contract laborer who has deserted his employer might successfully conceal his identity and find other employment. To guard against such an emer- gency the employer is required to withhold a part of the wages of the contract laborer, pending the fulfillment of his contract, and to deposit the same with a postal savings bank in the name of the laborer. In case the latter deserts, he forfeits the amount deposited for his benefit. To be sure, the regulations require the employer to pay his contract laborers the prevailing rate of wages. 1 But this is merely nudum jus, which could not be enforced in practice. Suppose the employer pays his imported laborer under the prevailing rate, what remedy has the latter to enforce his claim? He dare not leave his job and seek employment on better terms, for fear of deportation. For the same reason he dare not strike for higher wages. He must accept the wages stipulated in his contract (made in Mexico) although they may be below the pre- vailing rate paid for the same work in the same locality. "That wages paid and conditions provided" for the imported Mexican laborers were "perhaps in many cases not ideal," is admitted in a report of an investi- gating committee appointed by Secretary Wilson. It is learned from the same report that 10,691 imported contract laborers, i.e., 21 per cent of the total number, deserted. 8 1 "The New Mexican Immigration," by J. B. Gwin: The Survey, August 3, 1918, p. 491. 1 Monthly Labor Review, November, 1920, p. 223. STATISTICAL TABLES TABLE I. ANNUAL AVERAGE IMMIGRATION DISTRIBUTED BY OCCUPA* TIONS (IN THOUSANDS), 1.861-1910. x Occupation 1861-1870 1871-1880 1881-1890 1891-1900 1901-1910 Professional i 2 3* 2 IO Skilled ^o j-i CA AA 1^2 Agricultural pursuits, total 22 26 17 2<\ TCQ Common laborers .... C-I 60 I-I-I IO1 *ov 227 Servants . 9 II 25 l-I O2 All other occupations. . . 10 II 13 12 33 Total 125 14. t 265 210 651 TABLE II: FLUCTUATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT OF MALE WAGE-EARNERS IN THE MONTH OF MAY, 1899.* Greatest number laid off Industry Glucose Fur hats Jewelry Steam fittings and heating apparatus Number 1,267 1,650 1,924 1, 680 Total. 6,521 * Monthly Summary of Commerce and Finance, June, 1903, pp. 4408- 44 1 1 . Reports of the Immigration Commission. A bstract of the Statistical Review of Immigration to the United States, 1820-1910, Tables 11-12. Annual Reports of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, 1899, Table VII.,p. 19; 1900, Table VII., p. 21; 1901, Table IX., p. 26; 1902, Table IX., p. 29; 1903, Table IX., p. 33; 1904, Table IX., p. 30; 1905, Table VIII., p. 29; 1906, Table VIIL, p. 31; 1907, Table VIII., p. 31; 1908, Table VIII., p. 35; 1909, Table X., p. 46; 1910, Table X., p. 45. a Compiled from U. S. XII. Census Report on Manufactures, Pt. I, Table 2, pp. 20 et se^. a Difference between the greatest number employed at any time during the year and the number employed in May (i.e., the least number). 531 532 Appendix TABLE II. (Continued). Greatest number of temporary Help wanted.* Industry Numbet Awnings, tents, and sails 1,312 Bags, paper 33 8 Baskets and rattan and willow ware 1 ,889 Belting and hose, leather 63 Blacksmithing and wheel wrighting 345 Boxes, wooden packing 2,771 Brass castings and brass finishings 7 21 Bread and other bakery products 2,661 Bicycle and tricycle repairing 3,696 Carpets, rag 290 Carriages and wagons 14> l8 7 Cars, general shop construction and repairs by street railroad companies 57^ Cheese, butter, and condensed milk, factory product 5,789 Clothing, men's, custom work and repairing 16,861 Cork, cutting 123 Corsets 84 Dyeing and cleaning 771 Dyestuffs and extracts 178 Electroplating 483 Furniture, cabinetmaking, repairing and upholstering .... 2,384 Gas, machines and meters 193 Gloves and mittens 561 Grease and tallow 142 Grindstones 487 Hosiery and knit goods 1,723 Lamps and reflectors 439 Lock and gun smithing 100 Lumber, planing mill products, including sash, doors, and blinds 13,399 Lumber and timber products 93,238 Monuments and tombstones 4,43 Painting, house, sign, etc 48,838 Paperhanging 5,637 Paper and wood pulp 4,002 Photographic materials 55 Pipes, tobacco 138 Plumbers' supplies 7 834 Refrigerators 383 1 Difference between the number employed in May (i.e., the greatest number) and the least number employed at any time during the year. Appendix 533 TABLE II. (Concluded). Industry Safes and vaults Ship and boat building, wooden Slaughtering, wholesale, not including packing. Tin and terae plate Tobacco, chewing, smoking, and snuff Tobacco, cigars, and cigarettes Washing machines and clothes wringers Window shades Zinc, smelting and refining Total. . Number 137 5,346 743 1.594 3,983 6,348 212 247 590 252,01 7 TABLE III. MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM NUMBER OF WAGE-EARNERS EMPLOYED n MANUFACTURES DURING ANY ONE MONTH, NUMBER AND PER CENT UNEM PLOYED, 1899, AND PER CENT FOREIGN-BORN ENGAGED IN MANUFACTURED AND MECHANICAL PURSUITS, 1900, BY SEX AND BY STATES.' Rank ace ord- Unemployed ing to Number employed ; per cent State* (oo's omitted) 4 :|! . . I .-A 8>H 1 So 8 g g *1 P 1* Maximum month Minimum month *! *liS H I. MALES i 5 North Carolina May 47,9 August 42,5 5,4 11.3 1.0 2 3 South Carolina November 32,8 July 26,0 6,8 20.5 1.7 3 19 Georgia March 70,2 July 59.9 10,3 14.6 2.8 4 Virginia May 60,0 January 52,0 8,0 13.3 3-9 i Tennessee May 44.4 August 41,0 3,4 7.7 4-5 5 42 Mississippi October 28,4 July 19,6 8,8 31.0 4.6 7 25 Alabama October 49,2 July 40,3 8,9 18.1 5-5 8 33 Arkansas November 28,5 July 22,1 6,4 22.5 6.4 9 35 Oklahoma May 2,2 July i,7 5 22.7 9.0 10 ii 12 17 22 47 West Virginia Kentucky Louisiana May 31,9 May 56,9 November 54,3 July 27,4 January 48,0 July 28,3 4,5 8,9 26,0 14.1 15-6 47-9 10.3 "5 12.4 13 43 District of Columbia September 16,7 February 11,1 5.6 33-5 13-0 14 13 Indiana May 144.5 December 125,3 19,2 13-3 14.7 15 16 48 36 Indian Territory Florida November 2,4 March 36,0 June 1,1 July 27,8 1,3 8,2 54-2 22.8 15-2 1 6.0 17 20 Delaware September 19,2 February 16,3 2.9 i5-i 17.7 18 24 Maryland September 80,2 January 66,6 13,6 16.8 18.4 ' Compiled from XII. Census Report on Manufactures, Vol. I, Table 3, pp. 62-63 Occupations at the XII. Census, p. 164, Table 34. a States where the number of males or females, respectively, employed durinj the maximum month was less than 1000, are not included. 534 TABLE III. (Continued) Appendix Rank a ing perc fj ccord- to ent M ^ ~ il <* State Number employed (oo's omitted) Unemployed (Per cent foreign-born Number (oo's omitted) Per cent of greatest num- ber employedj Maximum month Minimum month 19 44 Texas October 56,5 June 37,6 18,9 33-5 18.9 2O 23 Kansas t May 33,3 January 27,8 5,5 16.4 194 21 27 Missouri May 115,2 January 93,1 22,1 19.2 2O.6 22 10 Ohio May 304,6 January 266,5 38,1 12.5 24.1 23 38 Maine September 60,6 January 45,5 15,1 24.9 24.2 24 39 Iowa September 54,9 January 40,0 14,9 27.2 26.5 3 40 21 Oregon Vermont June 1 6, 9 May 26,9 January 12,3 January 22,8 4,6 4,1 27.2 15-2 28.8 29.6 27 2 New Mexico May 2,6 February 2,4 2 7-7 30.c 28 26 Nebraska September 22,6 February 18,4 4,2 18.6 30.7 29 45 Idaho May 1,7 anuary I ,i 6 35-3 30 7 Pennsylvania May 596,7 January 531,5 65,5 II.O 33-2 3 1 3 1 California September 80,4 January 63,2 16,9 2I.O 34-4 32 Washington May 38,0 January 27,0 11,0 29.0 34-9 33 3 New Hampshire May 49,o [anuary 45,0 4,0 8.2 f\ 37-8 34 18 Arizona May 3,5 November 3,0 5 14.2 37-5 35 16 Colorado October 24,3 February 21,0 3,3 13-6 J 38.4 36 12 New Jersey May 191,6 January 166,4 25,2 13.2 38-S 37 II Wyoming August 2,3 February 2,0 3 13-0 40.$ 38 6 Connecticut May 135,2 January 121,2 14,0 IO.4 39 15 Illinois May 345,7 January 299,2 46,5 13-5 44-* 40 28 Michigan May 151,2 January 121,6 29,6 19.6 44-* 41 32 Wisconsin May 134,0 January 104,1 29,9 22.3 44-* 42 43 8 4 New York Massachusetts May 639,9 October 355,2 January 564,5 January 322,8 75,4 32,4 H.8 9.1 44-5 46.3 44 37 Utah September 6,2 February 4,7 24.2 45 9 Rhode Island September 66,9 January 59,0 7\9 11.8 47.C 46 29 Montana May 10,6 February 8,5 2,1 19.8 CJ 47 46 North Dakota September 2,7 February 1 ,6 1,1 40.7 53-! 48 34 Minnesota May 74,2 January 57,5 16,7 22.5 \j*j ^ 53-* UNITED STATES May 4333,9 January 3800,9 533,o 12.3 32-; II. FEMALES I 5 North Carolina May 16,7 July 14,7 2,0 12.0 O.2 2 3 South Carolina March 10,1 September 9,3 8 7-9 3 ii Georgia April 11,6 Bily 10,0 1,6 13-8 o.; 4 34 Mississippi October 2,1 ily 1,4 7 33-3 o.f 5 24 Alabama May 4,3 dy 3,3 1,0 23-3 I.C 6 H Virginia October 13,2 ily ii, i 2,1 15-9 i.t 7 8 Tennessee May 6,2 ebruary 54 8 12.9 j i 8 30 West Virginia October 4,0 July 2,8 30.0 3- ( 9 10 23 Kentucky Indiana April 1 0,0 September 22,8 August 7,8 July 15,9 2 ',2 6,9 22.0 30.3 4.1 5-4 Appendix S3S TABLE III. (Concluded). iank accord- Unemployed ing to per cent Of A+jh Number employed (oo's omitted) tij 3 f| Sd e* DlabC |i 5*1 Jj-5? 9P o y g 8 PH K jr C O PP, Maximum month Minimum month g 5 12.9 214 536 Appendix TABLE IV. PERCENTAGE RATIOS OF UNEMPLOYED AND OF FOREUM Rank according to per cent - | Occupation Unemployed a* any time during Foreign White } I the year I Males Telegraph and telephone operators. 9 .6 6.3 2 34 Confectioners. II.2 35-9 3 47 Bakers. H.3 56.4 4 32 Butchers. H.5 35-2 5 49 Brewers and maltsters. I2.I 71.9 6 27 Bartenders. 12.5 31.1 I 7 37 Porters and helpers (in stores). Cotton mill operatives. 12.6 19.8 38.3 9 Street railway employees. 13-3 24.2 10 19 Machinists. 134 27.7 ii 18 Blacksmiths. 13.7 / / 27.7 12 5 Printers, lithographers, and / / pressmen. 15-0 I 5-9 13 10 Steam railroad employees. 15-8 20.08 14 30 Paper and pulp mill 15 ii operatives. Servants and waiters. 16.9 I7.O 33-0 21.5 If 22 Steam boiler makers. 18.4 9 29.6 17 4 6 Bleachery and dye works T 18 9 operatives. Draymen, hackmen, 19-3 53-0 19 20 21 39 36 3 teamsters, etc. Woolen mill operatives. Brass workers. Messenger, errand, and office 19-3 19-5 19.6 197 20.4 43-1 37-3 boys. 10 8 22 23 24 21 Upholsterers. Cabinet makers. Plumber and gas and steam 20.9 20.9 28.1 56.5 fitters. 22.O IO.I *"* 11 24 2 Tool and cutlery makers. Oil well and oil works 22.0 30.2 27 38 employees. Textile workers (not soe- 22.8 10.5 28 26 cified). Wood workers (not spe- 23.8 41.8 29 30 43 cified). Leather curriers and tanners. Gold and silver workers. 24.6 24.8 25-3 30.8 47-7 34-5 Appendix 537 WHITE BREADWINNERS IN THE PRINCIPAL OCCUPATIONS, 1900. Rank according to per cent % Unemployed at I | Occupation any time during the year White* A 1 .1 1 3 1 44 Wire workers. 25.3 49-8 32 15 Tinplate and tinware makers. 25-9 24.9 33 50 Tailors. 27.0 75-8 34 29 Tobacco and cigar factory operatives. 27.2 32.6 35 35 Iron and steel workers. 28.1 35.9 36 37 42 28 Silk mill operatives. Boatmen and sailors. 29-3 33-3 47.1 31.8 38 39 25 Coopers. Sawing and planing mill 34-3 30.8 employees. 35-1 20.1 40 41 Marble and stone cutters. 39-5 44.6 41 45 Hat and cap makers. 41.0 50.4 42 16 Carpenters and joiners. 41.4 25.4 43 *3 Painters, glaziers, and varnishers. 42.4 23.5 44 40 Miners and quarrymen. 44-3 43.7 45 20 Laborers (not specified). 44-3 28.1 46 47 4 2 3 Paper hangers. Brick and tile makers. 44-5 48.4 13.5 30.0 48 33 Masons (brick and stone). 55-5 35-3 49 17 Plasterers. 56.1 25.8 50 12 Glass workers. 59-9 22.7 Females I I Telegraph and telephone operators. 10.7 6.2 2 14 Servants and waitresses. 14.8 25.9 3 18 Cotton mill operatives. 14.9 38.2 4 3 Printers, lithographers, and 5 presswomen. Bookbinders. 16.5 16.7 7.3 II.O 6 g Dressmakers. 19.8 16.5 7 10 Hosiery and knitting mill operatives. 20.0 17-9 8 7 Box makers (paper). 26.4 14.5 9 16 Woolen mill operatives. 31.1 32.1 10 Q Shirt, collar, and cuff makers. 22.1 1 6.6 II ;? 15 Textile workers (not specified). 22.1 30.7 12 II Seamstresses, 24-2 18.5 1 XII. Census. Occupations, pp. ccxxvii. et seq., Tables LXXXVIIL and LXXXIX.; pp. cxiv.-^xvi., Table XXXVII. 538 Appendix TABLE IV. (Concluded).' Rank according to per cent | 3 1 Occupation Unemployed at any time during the year Foreign White .1 a 3 13 14 12 4 Silk mill operatives. Milliners. 25.8 26.3 23.0 10.9 15 16 17 13 Tailors. Tobacco and cigar factory 26.4 38.2 17 6 operatives. Boot and shoe makers and 27.2 25.2 repairers. 42.5 I4.I 18 2 Laborers (not specified). 44.1 6.8 TABLE V. BITUMINOUS COAL MINES: GREATEST AND LEAST NUMBER EMPLOYED, PER CENT UNEMPLOYED AT ANY TIME DURING THE YEAR 1902, AND PER CENT FOREIGN WHITE MINERS IN 1900, IN THE PRINCIPAL STATES. x Rank according to per cent Number employed Per cent Per cent Foreign- Unem- State 3 unem- ployed white miners born ployed Greatest Least I 3 Texas 2.035 1,881 7.6 62.7 2 3 ii 2 Wyoming Pennsylvania 4,920 93,620 3,481 87,355 29.2 6.7 4 5 Illinois 39,557 32,809 I7.I 48.5 i 10 9 Iowa Kansas 10,719 8,120 7,749 6,179 27.7 23-9 39-7 33-6 I i Ohio IndianTerritory 27,770 5,109 24,241 4,054 12.7 2O.7 27-0 26.9 9 i Maryland 4,881 4,706 3-6 22.3 10 ii 12 7 12 6 Indiana West Virginia Arkansas 11,614 26,197 2,826 9,408 16,564 2,304 19.0 36.7 18.5 21.3 14.3 13-6 1 Compiled from Census Report on Mines and Quarries, 1902, pp. /IO-7I5, Table 60; Occupations at the XIL, Census, Table 41. "All States with less than 1,000 employees have been omitted; likewise New Mexico, Colorado, Missouri, and Washington, there being & large number of metalliferous miners in those States who are not segregated from coal miners in the census statistics of occupations. Appendix 539 TABLE VI. LABORERS, MALE: PER CENT FOREIGN WHITE AND PER CENT UNEMPLOYED, BY STATES, 1900. 1 Rank according to per cent StRtO Foreign White Unemployed Foreign White Unem- ployed I 22 North Carolina . O.I 42.1 2 5 Georgia 0.4 37-4 3 12 South Carolina 0.4 39-8 4 13 Alabama 0.6 40.6 36 Tennessee 0.6 45-5 6 20 Virginia 0.7 41.6 8 II 50 Mississippi Indian Territory 0.9 1-5 39-7 65.0 9 33 Arkansas 1.6 45-o 10 6 Florida 1.7 38-0 ii 42 Kentucky 3-3 49.0 12 49 Oklahoma 3-3 56.5 13 District of Columbia 4.1 38.6 14 30 West Virginia 5-5 44.2 15 26 Louisiana 5-7 43-5 10 40 Kansas 8.8 47.1 17 4 New Mexico 8-9 37-0 18 48 Indiana 9.8 52.1 19 28 Maryland 12.7 44.0 20 44 Missouri 13-3 49.4 21 23 Oregon 14.4 42.4 22 35 Texas 16.8 45-3 23 9 Delaware 17.5 39-3 24 38 Idaho 19.6 45.9 25 47 Iowa 20.9 51-2 26 Nevada 22.8 48.0 27 43 Ohio 24-3 49-3 28 18 Nebraska 26.2 4L5 29 2 Vermont 26.4 35** 3 Colorado 274 40.8 3 Wyoming 28.6 35-5 32 24 Washington 29.9 43-0 33 34 Maine 30.2 45-0 34 46 Utah 30.2 49.6 37 South Dakota 31-3 45-7 96 29 California 32.9 44.0 37 38 15 17 Pennsylvania Arizona 33-4 40.8 40.8 41.2 39 Montana 41.0 44.6 40 32 I Michigan New Hampshire 41.1 43-3 44-8 33.6 42 45 Illinois 44.1 494 1 Computed from Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 41. 540 Appendix TABLE VI. (Concluded). Rank according to per cent State Foreign White Unemployed Foreign White Unem- ployed 43 44 45 46 i 49 50 16 27 25 19 39 7 21 10 Wisconsin New York North Dakota New Jersey Minnesota Connecticut Massachusetts Rhode Island United States 48.0 50.2 52.1 52.9 Si 65.8 65.6 41.0 43-7 434 41-5 46.6 38.1 41.8 39-4 28.1 44-3 TABLE VII. COTTON MILL OPERATIVES, MALE: PER CENT FOREIGN WHITE AND PER CENT UNEMPLOYED, BY STATES, 1900. Rank according to per cent State Pore'gn White Unemployed Foreign White Unem- ployed I 13 North Carolina 0.2 14.8 2 7 South Carolina 0.2 II.4 3 20 Alabama I 7 .6 4 9 Mississippi 0-3 II.5 I 19 15 Georgia Virginia 0.4 0.9 I7.I 15-4 7 i Maryland 1.2 7-5 8 22 Tennessee 1.8 29.6 9 10 Kentucky 3-1 13-0 10 14 Texas 5-3 15.2 ii 23 Louisiana 7.2 34.0 12 3 Indiana 9.1 94 13 4 Delaware 17.8 II. I 14 16 Pennsylvania 19.6 16.1 15 8 Colorado 23.9 11.4 10 12 New York 30-7 14-3 II 17 21 New Jersey Vermont 36.8 48.2 ~ ** 16.4 21.7 19 5 Connecticut 60.5 II. I 20 21 ii 18 Rhode Island Maine 634 65.9 5 22 6 Massachusetts 72.3 Ii. I 23 2 New Hampshire * 74-5 9.1 United States 38.4 13-0 1 Computed from Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 41. Appendix S4i TABLE VIII. PERSONS EMPLOYED IN ALL INDUSTRIES OF MASSA- CHUSETTS, 1888-1908. x a 3 H 11 II | 1 I! Year *** "5 Year 1 c ' o O * II I a li 1888 221,307 169,610 51,697 1899 420,701 312,054 108,647 1889 293,321 224,887 68,434 1900 440,363 322,200 118,163 1890 322,288 251,107 71,181 1901 456,137 339,405 116,732 1891 335,919 260,419 75,500 1902 483,392 373,385 110,007 1892 352,939 271,399 81,540 1903 500,348 377,563 122,785 1893 345,388 222,370 123,018 1904 493,354 363,245 130,109 1894 310,167 206,423 103,744 1905 534,712 411,869 122,843 1895 351,915 258,776 93,139 1906 565,472 448,830 116,642 1896 358,529 241,363 117,166 1907 607,151 453,349 153,802 1897 377,399 272,204 105,195 1908 570,712 383,588 187,124 1898 386,383 271,847 H4,536 TABLE IX. IMMIGRANT BREADWINNERS DESTINED FOR MASSACHU- SETTS, 1 897-1 908. a Year Number Year Number Year Number 1897 17,147 1901 30,174 1905 56,349 1898 15,983 1902 39,747 1906 55,737 1899 21,724 1903 49,941 1907 64,764 1900 29,369 1904 43,998 1908 31,335 1 Massachusetts Statistics of Manufactures, 1889, pp. 61, 68, 202; 1890, pp. 91, 257, 315; 1891, pp. 91, 127, 135; 1892, pp. 33, 47, 399; 1893, pp.4i, 53, 3"! 1894, pp. 51, 89, 204; 1896, pp. 28, 70, 168; 1897, pp. 30, 70, 175; 1898, pp. 29, 31, 33, 35, 73, 169; 1901, pp. 70, 80, 82, 87; I 93, PP- 3 3 2 39, A 2 ' Annual Reports of the Bureau of Labor, XXXVII., pp. 285, 288, 316; XXXVIII., pp. 322, 353, 355, 367, 403; XXXIX., pp- 2, 36; XL., p. 2. 3 Report of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, 1897, Table IX; 1898, p. 26; 1899-1901, Table VII; 1902-1908, Table IX. 542 Appendix TABLE X. INCREASE OR DECREASE ( ) OF THE NUMBER OF BREAD- WINNERS, CLASSIFIED BY SEX, NATIVITY, AND OCCUPATION, IN THE UNITED STATES, 1890-1900 (THOUSANDS). Occupations Aggregate Native white Foreign white Colored Native parents Foreign parents All occupations, exclusive of farmers: Both sexes . 5.304 2,538 1,580 504 682 Males 4,081 1,223 312 2,014 524 I6 4 1,232 348 105 425 79 28 410 272 15 Females A. Professional service: Both sexes. Males 199 "3 1,423 IOI 63 587 65 40 495 24 4 135 9 6 206 178 28 461 Females B. Business and clerical pursuits: * Both sexes Males 1,070 353 3,569 415 172 1,787 376 119 980 IOI 34 341 Females C. All other occupations : Both sexes Males 2,812 757 21 1,498 28 9 5 791 189 ~3 300 4i II 9 2 Females. I. Occupations showing a general decrease in the demand for labor: Both sexes.. Males, total 20 4 i 2 3 ii 2 Brick and tile makers, etc Dairymen. . IO 8 I T 7 I , . T 'Occupations at the XII. Census, Table 34, p. cviii., and Table 2, pp. 10 et seq. Compendium of the XI. Census, 1890, Part III, Popula- tion, Table 78, pp. 452 et seq. * Agents, bankers, and brokers, officials of banks and companies, manufacturers and officials, etc., boarding- and lodging-house keepers, bookkeepers and accountants, clerks and^copyists, stenographers and typewriters, commercial travelers, salesmen and saleswomen, hotel keepers, merchants and dealers (wholesale), restaurant keepers, saloon keepers, livery-stable keepers, and undertakers. Appendix 543 TABLE X. (Continued). Native white Foreign Native parents Foreign parents white Colored All others in this group 3 2 I I Females: total I I Dairywomen I I II. Occupations in which native white have been displaced by immigrants or their children: Both sexes 7 59 37 29 Males, total 22 72 34 15 I Boatmen.canalmen, pilots and sailors i 2 4. Boot and shoe- makers and re- pairers II 12 4 2 I Carpenters anc joiners 18 25 16 8 Masons (brick anc stone) .... 6 5 4 4 Tailors ^8 I 4. "35 Woodworkers (not otherwise speci- fied 1 10 7 I 4, All others in this fiTOUD * 21 18 2 6 i Females, total 29 13 3 14 i Cotton mill opera- 28 25 i 4 _ . Q Seamstresses y I i 5 Other ^textile mill op 3 2 2 2 i All others in thi erouo 5 .. 2 2 'Includes boxmakers (paper), broom and brush makers. * Includes distillers and rectifiers, harness and saddle makers and repairers, hat and cap makers, leather curriers and tanners, marble and stone cutters, millers, and plasterers. s Includes bleachery and dye works operatives, hucksters and peddlers. 544 Appendix TABLE X. (Concluded). Native white Foreign P___- j Occupations Aggregate Native parents Foreign parents parents III. Occupations in which immigrants have been displaced by native white: Both sexes 87Q 678 288 82 c Males, total 810 661 241 40 52 Agri cultural 68=; <;88 i8d IO 77 6 All others in agricul- tural pursuits '. . Blacksmiths . . 13 16 16 7 TO 14 -~2 4 ~ i Clerks and copyists Hostlers 55 U 1 24 32 2 j I Saw and planing- mill employees.. . All others in this 8 24 6 H 3 *j 2 16 j Females, total 69 17 47 42 47 Servants and wait- 69 16 47 41 47 Paper- and pulp- i I IV. Occupations showing a general increase in the demand for labor: Both sexes 2,704 i,i73 658 405 468 Males 2,044 QI3 SIQ 336 276 Females 660 260 T-JQ oo 60 102 A oy 6 Negroes only. There are no comparative data for other colored agricultural laborers at the XI. Census. 'Includes gardeners, florists, nurserymen, etc., lumbermen, wood choppers, etc., stock raisers, herders, and drovers. Includes brewers and maltsters, potters, telegraph and telephone linemen, trunk and leather-case makers, etc. TABLE XL NUMBER AND INCREASE OR DECREASE, OF FOREIGN-BORN (THOUSAN 1 1 ' Occupations. German Irish English and V 1890 1900 Increase (+) or Decrease (-) 1890 Z900 Increase (+) or Decrease 1890 1900 Ir D Farmers, planters, and overseers 282.7 10.7 69.6 19.9 37-9 26.7 95-6 36.2 20.4 19.2 IO.2 36.3 IS-S 154-9 97.0 414.9 263.7 1 8.0 66.5 30-S 30.0 23.0 83.6 39-7 18.8 Z9.0 & 12.0 129.6 8 4 .6 421.6 19.0 + 7-3 3-1 + 10.6 + 2.1 3-7 12.0 + 3-5 1.6 .a ri:J - 3-S -25.3 12.4 + 6.7 93-4 2.9 25.2 IO.2 14.4 IS-4 46.7 21.7 36.5 27-9 2.3 S-8 19.6 202.4 35-9 245.4 67.0 7-9 20.6 14.9 13.9 15.4 41.9 21.2 31.2 22.9 1.7 3-8 14.6 158.9 30.4 247.9 7II.2 -26.4 + 5.0 -4-6 + 4-7 + -5 .0 - 4-8 - .5 - 5-3 - 5-0 - .6 2.O - S.o -43.5 5.5 + 2.5 90.5 7.2 4.6 16.6 10.3 17.2 16.2 40.4 21. 1 9.1 56.7 1.6 3.8 23.8 36.4 26.7 130.7 57.7 9.6 IS.2 14.2 19-7 16.1 32.8 20.5 8.3 44.9 9 2.3 19.6 28.3 21.6 127.3 - Manufacturers and offi- cials etc Merchants and dealers (except wholesale) Bookkeepers, accountants, clerks, and copyists Blacksmiths and m a- chinists . Steam railroad employees. Miners and quarrymen Saw- and planing-raill em- ployees . . Tailors . . Textile mill operatives Laborers (not specified) 3 .. . Agricultural laborers and all others in this class. . . All others Total 1.337-7 1,276.0 -61.7 804.7 487.4 439.0 *XI. Census, Part II., Table 109, p. 484. Reports of the Immigration Cor, Laborers in 1890 include in some agricultural districts agricultural labore [ALE BREADWINNERS, CLASSIFIED BY NATIONALITY AND OCCUPATION IQOO. 1 Scotch. Bohemian. Hungarian. Italian Increase Increase Increase Imcrease JO I90O or Decrease 1890 1900 or Decrease 1890 1900 or Decrease 1890 1900 or Decrease .1 16.5 + -4 14.4 18.1 + 3-7 .8 1.4 f .6 2.2 4.4 + 2.2 .0 3-3 -f 2.3 3 5 h * .2 .6 + -4 .2 l.i f -9 9 7 7 4.4 4.6 5-8 ft? + 2.1 1.2 i 2.1 I.O I.O + .9 + -6 1-3 4 4 2.9 1.4 I.O + 1.6 -f- i.o + .6 7.0 5 2.3 16.0 2.0 3-8 -f 9.0 tii 7 5-3 12.5 + .6 + .2 .6 2.7 .7 3-7 i;z .5 '5 .9 1.4 + '.9 .8 3-3 1.6 IO.2 -f .8 + 6.9 '7 : 3 7.8 2.7 9-7 + T '-l 2.1 x.o .7 9 1.8 .8 1.6 -f .8 + .1 -f- .7 3 X.3 7-3 ,1 26.5 t 5 +19.2 4 10.3 9-7 1.6 17.3 25.5 + 7*0 4-15-8 .4 .1 t-7 r-8 .4 I.O 3-6 7-3 .0 I.I ~ -5 1-3 3-3 .2 8.2 .7 4.9 .4 10.0 - .6 + 1.6 + .2 + 1.8 .1 x.8 3 II. 8 .1 3-7 I.O 19.8 .0 .2 2-3 1.2 39-0 5 7-8 3-9 91.8 -f -3 + 5-5 5 5 . M 7.2 37.8 + -7 + 5-3 3-6 11.9 4.8 19.3 + 7-4 .7 8.8 1.4 23.8 + -7 -fiS.o 6.5 28.2 12.2 76.7 + 5-7 +48.5 129.9 II-7 51-3 71.4 20. 1' 36.S 88.4 +5I-9 114.1 276.4 + 162.3 vol. i, pp. 821-829, Table A. Appendix 545 TABLE XII. FOREIGN-BORN ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS IN GERMANY, 1900.' Occupations Thou sands Males Females Agriculture en 21 Trade 77 IO Transportation M Manufactures 245 12 Common labor 26 IO Professional pursuits 18 IO Living on income from property 18 16 Servants I 21 Total 4.17 122 TABLE XIII. FOREIGN-BORN IN GERMANY, BY COUNTRY OF BIRTH (THOUSANDS), 1880-1900.* Year Total Austria- Hungary Russia Italy All other countries 1880 419 150 57 8 204 1890 518 206 53 13 246 I9OO 823 362 8 9 62 310 Increase 1880-1900 404 212 32 54 1 06 1 Erganzungsheft zu den Viertelsjahrsheften zur Statistik des Deut- schen Reichs, 1905. Heft I. Die Deutschen im Auslande und die Auslander im Deutschen Reich, p. 40. a Ibid. 546 Appendix TABLE XIV. FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION FROM THE SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES AND FROM SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROPE, BY STATES, 1880, 1890, 1900, AND I9I0. 1 States From the Scandinavian Countries From Southern and Eastern Europe 1880 1890 1900 1910 1880 1890 1900 1910 Minnesota.... 107,768 46,046 17,869 16,685 644 1,185 5" 12,755 1,524 1,942 215,215 72,873 65,588 46,341 6,411 3,506 2,382 16.863 21,413 7,333 236,670 72,611 76,051 40,107 9.741 5.621 2,989 18,285 26,254 9,007 243,899 66,586 100,654 39,592 15,513 9,775 4,078 17,826 68,228 20,153 7,577 2,777 6,978 7.006 191 100 78 237 424 991 21,988 3,562 18,787 12,984 2,533 776 1,320 789 4.949 4,005 30,544 6,709 33,735 16,283 6,655 1.280 2,282 1,519 7.657 4,129 110,793 1,603,071 76,833 34,593 65.559 47,177 23,644 7,074 9,607 10,482 44,784 22,503 The Dakotas.. Nebraska Montana Idaho Wyoming Utah Washington . . Total . . , 206,929 233,333 457,925 475,324 497,336 566,973 586,304 664,196 26,359 152,339 71,693 626,677 342,256 4,466,244 All other Total, U. S.. . 440,262 933,249 1,064,309 1,250,500 178,698 698,370 1,713,864 4,808,500 TABLE XV. EMIGRATION FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM, BY DESTINA- TION OF EMIGRANTS, 1840-1909. a Year & I British South Africa Australia and New Zealand Other Countries Tota; X84O 32.2Q7 40,642 IE SCQ T QC8 OO 74.7 1841 38,164 45.OI7 72 .62 5 2786 Il8 5Q2 1842 54,123 6*. 8 52 8.574 1.875 128 74.4 1843 23,518 28,77 1.4.78 *"v)O I.88I 57,212 1844 22 ,924 47,660 2 22Q I 877 7O 686 1845 31,803 58,578 87O 2 770 O7 5OI 1846 43,439 82,279 2,74.7 I 826 I2O 851 1847 109,680 142,154 4.04.0 I 4.87 258 27O 1848 31,065 188,277 27 QO4 A 887 *T*/** 24.8 089 1849 41 ,367 219,450 12 TOT 6 4.QO 2OQ 4.08 1 Compiled from the United States Census of 1880, vol. i., pp. 492- 495; XIII. Census. Population, vol. i., Table 33, pp. 834-838. s Compiled from Statistical Abstracts ofthe United Kingdom of Great Britain. Reprint of the Statistical Abstracts for the United Kingdom for 1840-1854, p. 84; 14, p. 122; 29, p. 161; 42, p. 239; and 57, p. 363. Appendix TABLE XV. (Continued). 547 Year | 1 a British South Africa Australia and New Zealand Other Countries Total 1850 32,961 223,078 I6.O17 8 771 2$O R -in 1851 42,605 267,157 21,5-12 4.472 -l-je r\f)f. 1852 32,873 2 44., 26l 87 881 37/1O o5oy ifiR "7fiA 1851 34*522 210,885 61 ,401 >/4y 3I2Q 300,704 I8S4 43,76i I01,o65 8-1 217 1 166 329,937 1855 17,966 101,414 52.1OQ 3118 o-^O'^y 1 76 8O7 1856 16,378 111,837 44,584 3.755 1 76 ^ 5J A. 1857 21,001 126 QO5 61 248 1 721 1 /",aO'f 212 87 C 1858 9,704 eg, 716 1Q 205 52^7 < 1 2,O75 III Q*72 1850 6,689 7O.1O1 11 .Oil 12 427 i o'y/- I2O A12 1860 9,786 87.5OO 24.1O2 6,88 1 128 j.6o 1861 12,707 40,764 21,7l8 7.56l OI 77O 1862 15,522 c8 706 41 84.1 5141 121 21/1 1863 18,083 14.6 811 51 O54 58O8 221 7^8 1864 12,721 I4.7.O42 4O.Q42 8.IQ5 ^^O'/O 2O8 900 1865 17,211 147,258 17,28l "*yo 8 O4Q 209 801 1866 13,255 l6l,OOO 24.O07 6.51O 204 882 1867 12,160 I26,O5I I4.O21 4.748 I56.O82 1868 12,332 1 08 40O 12 112 5 Oil 1 18 187 1869 20,921 14.6.7-17 14 457 4 185 1 86 300 1870 27,168 ic -i ,4.66 16,526 5.151 202 511 1871 24,954 I 50,788 11,695 5,114 102. 751 1872 I8* 7 ! 24,382 29,045; 161,782 166.710 15.248 25 117 9,082 7 411 210,494 228 145 1874. 20,728 1 1 -1,774. 52.581 IO.l8o IQ7 272 1875 12,306 Sl.IQl 14,7 CQ 12.426 I4O.675 1876 Q,^5 54,554 12,106 Il.l84 IO0.460 1877 7,720 45 48l 1O 1 18 11,856 IO5.IQ5 1878 10,652 54 6Q4 l6 47O II.O77 1 12 ,9O2 1870 17,052 Ot'^yt OI.8o6 4O.Q5Q 11,557 164,274 1880 20,902 166 57O 24 184 15.886 227,542 1881 21.012 176 IO4 22 682 20,^04 24.1,002 i 1882 40,4.4,1 181 001 17,280 10,711 270,166 188-; 44,185 101.57"% 71 ,264 11,006 320,118 1884 -ilj-id. I55.28O 44,255 11,510 242,179 1885 10 818 T -17 68? 1O.1Q5 10,724 207,644 1886 24.745 152 7IO 41.O76 12,169 232,900 1887 12 .02 "5 201,526 14,l8l 13,753 281,487 1888 14.851 105,086 31,127 17,962 279,928 1889 28,269 168,771 28,294 28,461 253,795 Appendix TABLE XV. (Concluded). c o> 3 2 1 11 1 0* oj"c3 Year & 3 1 "3 jl 1 Total 2 21,179 22,004 2l8,Il6 1890 '5 g I ^6*^0 S ^ ' * * / 7 19,547 20,987 218,507 1891 21 26A T so'mo * "*\y^/ 20,799 210,042 T Qft^ 3' 2 I4.8.Q4.Q 1 1 ,203 23,930 208,814 IO 93 T Q.f\A T*7 A Cfi ^Wff^y 104 ooi 10,017 156,030 1094 1895 J. f jnOy 16,622 126,502 20,234 * **ry * / 10,567 1^256 185,181 1896 15,267 98,921 24.594 io,354 12,789 161,925 1897 15,571 85,324 21,109 12,061 12,395 146,460 1898 17,640 80,494 19.756 10,693 12,061 140,644 1899 16,410 92,482 14.432 ",467 11,571 146,362 1900 i8,433 102,797 20,815 14,922 11,848 168,815 1901 15,757 104,195 23,143 15.350 13.270 171,7^5 1902 26,293 108,498 43,206 14,345 13.320 205,662 1903 59,652 123,663 50,206 12,375 14,054 259,950 1904 69,681 146,446 26,818 14.581 27L435 1905 82,437 122,370 26,307 I5',i39 15.824 262,077 1906 II4.859 144,817 22,804 I9,33i 23,326 325.137 1907 151,216 170,264 20,925 24,767 28,508 395.680 1908 81,321 96,869 19.568 33,569 31,872 263,199 1909 85,887 109,700 22,017 37.620 33,537 288,761 TABLE XVI. CONGESTION IN DUBLIN: CLASSIFICATION OF TENE- MENTS OF FOUR ROOMS OR LESS, BY NUMBER OF ROOMS AND BY NUMBER OF PERSONS PER TENEMENT, 1901.* Number of tenements of i room 2 rooms 3 rooms 4 rooms i 3.278 702 172 IOI 2 5.544 2,234 779 597 3 4.392 2,231 900 772 4 3.384 2,240 952 816 5 2,302 2,022 825 818 6 1,477 1.575 765 680 7 797 1,205 620 562 8 362 773 433 422 9 US 367 238 320 10 47 1-75 163 201 ii 13 62 74 9 8 12 or more 6 34 50 97 Total 21,747 13,620 5.971 5.484 1 Census of Ireland, 1901. General Report, p. 173, Table 50. Appendix 549 TABLE XVI. (Continued). Summary Total With 4 rooms or less , Number of persons per room: Not more than one Not more than two Not more than three , More than three.. , Number of tenement* 59.263 46,822 10.351 15.039 9.996 11,436 TABLE XVII. "REPRESENTATIVE" HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES FOR FOOD IN THE IRON DISTRICT OF THE SOUTH, FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE WEEK IN 1909.* o Persons Expenditure "3 t cja per household Nutrition for food kfl Nationality Income Jfe Adults Children household For the week Per man per day 2 ) $10.50 2 3 21.7 $6.48 $0.30 3 4 6 ( South r Italian ) Q.OO 22.OO 10.50 2 3 2 i 2 5 14.7 28.7 28.7 6.1 1 8.16 10.35 0.41 0.28 0.36 7 16.00 3 2 24-5 9.10 0-37 9 ig.OO 3 I 23-8 7.65 0.32 10 ii American White 25.00 18.00 2 2 3 3 21.7 21.7 7.88 7.80 0.36 0.36 12 12.00 2 12.6 3-65 O.29 13 23.00 2 I 15.6 9-63 0.62 TABLE XVIII. EARNINGS AND EXPENSES IN MASSACHUSETTS, 1800, 1830, and 1860.' 1800 1830 1860 Expenses of a family of four &12Q $4. -II $587 Earnings: Master carpenter ^25 455 520 Journeyman carpenter 266 JQO 4.ce Master mason soo soo too 625 Journeyman mason Z7C 4^8 5OO Master painter ^25 455 52O Journeyman painter 26O 455 Laborer 226 V5 1 Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 9, pp. 215-221. 3 Third Annual Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor (1871-1872), pp. 514-517. 550 Appendix TABLE XIX. AVERAGE INCOME AND EXPENDITURES OF WAGE- EARNERS IN SPECIFIED OCCUPATIONS, IN NEW JERSEY, 1885.' Surplus ( -f ) *< J 1 1 *< a or deficit (-) Occupations Number c famlies Average nun in famil3 G O * l! '3 o M t i* M Expenditure family Of head of family 3 Glass-blowers . 48 4-9 1-3 $941 $1,070 $737 +$333 +$204 Other glass- workers . . . 34 4.8 1.6 693 813 654 + 159 + 58 Blacksmiths. . ii 5-9 1.6 712 747 674 + 73 + 19 Iron- workers. 15 4-8 1-5 493^ 573 538 ~ 45 Shoemakers. . 32 1.4 542 583 565 4~ 18 - 23 Carpenters. . . 12 5-5 1-5 545 678 661 + 17 - 16 Machinists. . . 24 4-9 1-5 558 629 619 + 10 - 61 Flax - mill workers .... 28 4.9 1-7 374 482 501 -19 - 127 Silk - mill workers 34 4.2 1-5 322 368 459 -91 - 137 TABLE XX. AVERAGE INCOME AND EXPENDITURES OF UNSKILLED LABORERS IN NEW JERSEY, CLASSIFIED BY NATIVITY AND SOURCE OF INCOME, 1885.* Item t Breadwinners in the family Father alone Father and children Native English Irish Native English Irish Number of families 20 X 9 13 3 6 Earnings of: Father $381 $519 $2 4 6 $368 222 $494 175 $249 246 Children Total $381 361 $519 567 $246 272 $590 578 $669 634 $495 531 Expenditures 1 Eighth Annual Report of the New Jersey Bureau of Statistics of Labor and Ind. (1885), p. 147. a Income of family less expenditures of family. 3 Earnings of head of family less expenditures of family. * Eighth Annual Report of the Bureau of Statistics of New Jersey, 1885, PP- 30-34- Appendix TABLE XX. (Concluded). 551 Item Breadwinners in the family Father alone Father and children Native English Irish Native English Irish Number of families 20 I 9 12 3 6 -$36 -282 Surplus (+) or deficit ( ) +$20 +20 -48 -$26 -26 +$12 210 +$35 140 Earnings of father over expenses Surplus (4-) or deficit ( ) .. TABLE XXI. AVERAGE WAGES AND AVERAGE EXPENSES OF WORKING FAMILIES WITH DEFICITS, IN OHIO, 1885.* |I S, 0) >> Sx to one m if i fc 0) g 75 1*1 Occupation p 2 f a-2 f 3 < o< Stonecutters . . 4 5- 4-5 i.i $505 $507 $2 3-5 Machinists 27 4-2 5-3 0.8 556 571 15 2.4 Cabinet- makers 6 4.5 4.3 1.05 481 537 56 3-5 a Iron workers. . 21 57 5-7 I.O 679 745 66 5-3 Wood carvers . . 5 5-6 3-4 1.6 659 772 113 2.1* Cigar makers... Miners . . . 20 cy 4.8 5-8 3-2 4.1 1-5 1.4 394 3<>3 508 422 114 119 4-5 2.9 1 Eleventh Annual Report of the Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics (1885), Table 27, p. 117. IX Census, Population Part II., p. 596. 3 Cabinet makers and upholsterers. * Woodworkers other than cabinetmakers, carpenters, and joiners. 552 Appendix TABLE XXII. ORGANIZED WORKERS AND MALE WHITE BREAD- WINNERS, ENGAGED IN NON-AGRICULTURAL PURSUITS, IN ILLINOIS AND NEW JERSEY, CLASSIFIED BY NATIVITY.* Illinois, 1886 New Jersey, 1887 Nativity Breadwinners Organized Breadwinners Organized Number: Native Foreign-bora 423.290 308.595 25.985 57.163 243.093 137.385 24,463 26,704 Total Per Cent: Native Foreign-bora 73L885 57-8 42.2 83,148 31-3 68.7 380,478 63-9 36-1 5LI67 47-8 52.2 Total 1 00.0 1 00.0 1 00.0 100.0 TABLE XXIII. MALE LABOR UNION MEMBERSHIP AND IMMIGRATION, NEW YORK STATE, 1897-1910. H in it jl* Year Se Year i] n ||* 3| fz IJs 33 its $** H^'** 1897 1898 1899 162,690 163,562 200,932 55,871 53,310 70,740 1904 1905 1906 378,859 370,971 386,869 193,430 241,689 269,477 I90O I9OI 233,553 261,523 99,104 106,817 1907 1908 422,561 361,761 297,300 173,022 1902 1903 313,592 380,845 154,872 198,620 1909 1910 360,319 453,8oi 145,036 207,021 1 Fourth Biennial Report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of Illi- nois, 1886, pp. 224-226; Population at XI. Census, Part II, pp. 552-553; ibid., Table 116, p. 586; Tenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor and Industries of New Jersey, p. 15. Annual Report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of New York State, 1910, vol. II., Table 34, p. xlix. * Reports of the Commissioner-General ~of Immigration, 1897, p. 38; 1898, p. 26; 1899, p. 17; 1900, p. 20; 1901, p. 17; 1902, p. 29; 1903, P- 33J 1904, p. 30; 1905, p. 345 1906, p. 37; 1907, p. 35; 1908, p. 39; 1909, P- 575I9IO, p. 55. Appendix SS3 TABLE XXIV. URBAN POPULATION, MEMBERSHIP OF LABOR UNIONS AND PERCENTAGE OF ORGANIZED INDUSTRIAL WAGE-EARNERS IN NEW YORK AND KANSAS, 1 900-1909. * Union membership of both sexes Vr Urban population both sexes a Number Percentage of indus- trial wage-earners 3 New York Kansas New York Kansas New York Kansas I9OO 5,293.1" 330,903 245,381 6,341 18.3 57 I9OI 5,486,849 347,191 276,141 8,649 2O.6 7.8 I9O2 5,675,587 363,479 329,101 7,715 24.6 7.0 1903 5,864,225 379,767 395,598 9,657 29.6 8.7 1904 1905 6,052,963 6,241,701 395,953 412,241 391,676 383,226 12,074 12,454 29.3 28.6 10.9 II.2 1906 6,430439 428,529 398,494 12,187 29.8 II.O 1907 6,619,177 444,817 436,792 13.058 32.6 11.8 1908 6,807,915 461 ,005 372,459 23,995 27.8 21.6 1909 6,996,653 477.293 372,729 21,385 27.9 19-3 TABLE XXV. DAILY WAGES IN STEEL COMPANY No. i, 1880-1908.4 Occupations 1880 I88 S 1890 1895 1900 1903 1908 I. Bessemer Depart- ment: Laborer $1.2-? $I.OO $I.IO $I.IO $I.IO I.V> $1.45 I. OS 2.IO 2.2O Fireman 1.38 .89 I.OO .70 I.9O Carpenter 1.22 I. -1C .75 I.9O Metal breaker. . . Skull cracker . . . 2.20 1.32 i-55 i. 60 1-33 1.18 1.38 55 55 1.65 1.64 Ashman . 1.45 .95 I.OO .50 1-55 1 Annual Report of the New York Bureau of Labor, 1909, p. xxxviii, Table 7; Annual Reports of the Kansas Bureau of Labor, 1900-1909. a Census figures for 1900, estimates for subsequent years. * The number of industrial wage-earners at the XII. Census (1900) in New York was 1,337,000, and in Kansas, 110,000. The method of classification and computation is explained in an article by the writer in the Journal of Political Economy, 1911, March and April: "Social- Economic Classes of the Population of the United States. " * Report of the Immigration Commission, vol. 8, pp. 448, 449. 'Only such occupations have been selected for which comparable data are available. 554 Appendix TABLE XXV. (Concluded). Occupation 1880 1885 1800 1805 i poo 1003 1908 1. 08 1.30 I.4O l.d.5 I.OO 1.30 1.35 I.IO I.OO 1.30 1-35 .68 75 I.OO 1.30 1.35 II. Blast Furnaces: z. io 1.04 .00 .00 1.20 1.30 1.^8 Engineer . i.oo 1.65 .60 .60 2.2O 2.50 2.65 .15 1O 65 2.IO 2.25 Blacksmith Helper 1.84 .... oy .26 .IO 45 .15 .60 25 2.00 3 2.10 1.38 1.55 .17 35 3 .84 2.05 Carpenter Fireman 1.55 1.27 I.OO 50 .17 -45 .30 .60 5 .80 .75 1.90 1.85 Hot-stove tender .26 .45 .60 .70 ,80 .IO .OO .20 55 .60 .15 .15 5 .50 .60 Coke fillers Cinder man 1-55 1.55 1. 15 25 .20 .OO .26 .40 50 .45 .60 55 Fillers I.5O I.I5 .25 35 44 .40 50 .OO .20 32 .15 45 .00 1. 20 .32 3O 38 III. Mechanical De- partment: Brick mason: Minimum 1.85 1.57 1.05 1. 80 1. 80 2.25 2.47 Maximum Patternmaker: . Minimum Maximum Blacksmith: Minimum Maximum Boilermaker: Minimum 2-45 1-55 2.50 1.65 2.70 I 60 3-42 1-54 2-43 i 62 2.50 1-35 2. 2O I 75 3-00 1.62 2.58 I 65 3-65 2.10 2.70 I 6O 3-24 1.48 3-00 i-43 2.92 i 48 3-60 1-55 3-25 1-57 3-25 1.62 Maximum Roofer: Minimum 2-75 I 5O 2.25 i ii */> 2.50 I 6O *-v3 2.47 I "?J. 2.85 I 55 2.67 i 10 2-95 I 45 Maximum Carpenter: Minimum Maximum... . . Painter: Minimum 2.OO 1.60 2.50 1. 20 ^o 1 2.50 1. 60 1.80 2.70 t "O e t 2.50 2.OO 2. 2O *OO 2.75 i-55 2.40 *jp* 2.40 1.29 2-37 1.98 2.65 1.41 2.60 2.17 Maximum 2.IO 2 25 2.47 Mason (helper) : Minimum Maximum I.IO 1.30 70 1.48 .... I.I5 1-35 i.iS 1.40 I.IO 1-35 1.20 1.48 Appendix 555 TABLE XXVI. PER CENT OF MACHINE- MINED BITUMINOUS COAL AND PER CENT RATIO OF FOREIGN-BORN FROM SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROPE FOR EACH OF THE PRINCIPAL COAL-PRODUCING STATES, 1900 and 1910.* State Mined by machinery Ratio of Southern and Eastern Europeans to total population 3 Per cent of min- ers of S. and . European par- entage 1910 1900 1910 1900 1900 Ohio 84.44 64.03 48.87 45-51 45-37 38.63 46.53 43-91 27.36 33-65 15.09 19-73 5-5 0-3 1.8 10.9 1.2 7-9 1-5 O.I 0.5 4-9 0.6 3-0 9.0 0-5 5-5 36.0 9-5 22.0 Kentucky. .. Indiana Pennsylvania West Virginia Illinois TABLE XXVII. PER CENT OF MINERS OF SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROPEAN PARENTAGE,* LIVES LOST PER MILLION TONS, AND PER 1,000 EMPLOYEES, IN BITUMINOUS COAL MINES. * State Per cent of miners of S. and E. European parentage. 1900 Fatal accidents per i, ooo employees, 1889-1908 Lives lost per million tons, 1866-1908 Pennsylvania. . . . Illinois 36.0S 22 .0 2.71 2.33 3-83 3-94 Oklahoma West Virginia Chio I4.O 9-5 o.o 5.07 4.64 2.14 I3 4l 3-95 6.0 2.15 5.22 5.5 2.32 3.73 2.O 455 7.27 \laryland IS 1.77 1.96 Tennessee I.O 4.38 9.04 Kentucky 0.5 1. 60 3-34 1 U. S. Geological Survey, Production of Coal, 1910, p. 51. These six States produced 90 per cent of the total output of machine-mined coal in the United States for 1900-1909, and 80 per cent of the total output of bituminous coal for 1910. * Advance information issued to the "press by the [Director of the Census. J Computed from XII. Census Report on Occupations, Table 41. * Bureau of Labor Bulletin No. go, Table XXIX, pp. 452, 6/1. s Includes both bituminous and anthracite mines. 556 Appendix TABLE XXVIII. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AND FATAL ACCIDENT RATES IN THE ANTHRACITE MINES OF PENNSYLVANIA, 1870-1909.' b L Is 1 w/ 3 > S& SB g^ 89 1? 0) m o s'S g l l 8-g 2 'S* > 'S Years i 3s Years jo gJ ^ a O o 3 go I* g2 aj ||1 W^, 3q 3* w*^ 3 M " i i2 M " I" 1870 36 5-93 14.89 1890 120 3-15 8.4O 1871 37 5-60 13.52 1891 123 3-47 8.61 1872 45 4.98 14.32 1892 130 3-21 8.16 1873 48 5.48 12.57 1893 138 3.30 8.63 1874 53 4.33 11.59 1894 I4O 3-19 8.75 1875 70 3-40 10.17 1895 144 2.93 7-39 1876 70 3-24 9.73 1896 150 3-34 9-32 1877 67 2.90 7.85 I8 97 150 2.83 8.04 1878 64 2.92 8.95 1898 142 2.89 7.78 1879 69 3-81 8.44 1899 141 3.28 7.62 1880 1881 11 2-75 3-59 7.22 7.98 1900 1901 144 148 2.86 3-47 7.16 7-65 1882 82 3-54 8.30 1902 148 2.03 7.26 1883 1884 91 IOI 3-53 3-28 8.56 9.10 1903 1904 152 161 3-41 3.69 6.89 8.08 1885 100 3.31 8.68 1905 168 3.83 8.19 1886 103 2.71 7.16 1906 166 3-35 7.72 1887 107 2.97 7-50 1907 169 4.20 8.23 1888 122 2.98 7.81 1908 175 3-88 8.12 1889 120 3-32 9.09 1909 171 3-31 7.07 Report of the Pennsylvania Department of Mines, 1909, Part I, Table L., p. 57. Appendix 557 TABLE XXIX. NUMBER OF FATAL ACCIDENTS AND RATIO PER 1000 EMPLOYEES ON RAILROADS AND IN COAL MINES, 1889-1908. Number Ratio per 1000 employees I !! 1 is mines, Canada S 1 11 1 1 s mines, Canada Years 1 H 1 jl tf II 1 il J <3 7 AGRICULTURE, 103-113, (See also: Rural Depopulation); Centrali- zation of industry: effect upon farming, 107; Demand: for labor in a. and in industry, 7, 104; Differentiation of manu- facturing: from a., 106, 107; Irish Immigrants: reluctance towards a., 66; Machiipry: 108; Wages: low, no; of agricul- tural and other unskilled labor- ers, in ALIENS, arrival and departure of, 1908-1920, 558 AN'THRACITE COAL, (See: Coal Mines, Anthracite) ANTHRACITE COAL STRIKE COM- MISSION, award of the, 456 APARTMENT HOUSES, increase, 282 ARISTOCRACY OF LABOR, English- speaking, created by immigra- tion, 9, 161, 163, 164, 394 ASSIMILATION, English language: ability to speak, 58 ; Problem of: 42, 75; Recent immigrants: 77 B BASTABLE, C. P., 218, 219 BERGER, VICTOR L., 394 BEVERIDGE, W. H., 114, 121, 123, 124, 126, 522; (See also: Un- employment) BING, ALEXANDER M., 500, 501, 505 BIRDS OF PASSAGE, 74; by race, 75 BIRTH RATE, (See: Race Suicide) BITUMINOUS COAL, (See: Coal, Bituminous) BITUMINOUS COAL MINES, (See: Coal Mines, Bituminous) BOARDERS AND LODGERS, Earn- ings: of head of family, 253; Old immigration: per cent of families keeping b. a. 1. among the races of the, 253; Rent: and b. a. 1., 254; Statistics: of the Immigration Commission unre- liable, 251, 252 BOSTON, 25, 65, 241, 242, 356, 363; Home ownership: 1845-1900, 277; Housing: number of fami- lies per house, 1853-1900, 242; Tenancy: 1790, 1845, 1890, and 1900, 276; Tenement houses: 1855 and 1900, 241; unsanitary in the '70*8, 241, 242 BREADWINNERS, English: number, 1890 and 1900, 1 66; in selected occupations, 1 890-1 900, 1 68 ; German: number, 1890 and 1900, 1 66; in selected occupa- tions, 170; Increase or decrease: by sex, nativity, and occupa- tion, 1890-1900, 141; Irish: number, 1890 and 1900, 166; in selected occupations, 169; Welsh: number, 1890 and 1900, 1 66; in selected occupations, 1 68; (See also: Foreign-born; Immigration) BRITISH COLONIES, British immi- gration to, encouraged by colo- nial governments, 210 BRITISH EMIGRATION, decline of, effect of home conditions, 173 BRITISH IMMIGRATION, encouraged by colonial governments, 210 BUDGETS, (See: Family Budgets) BURNETT, JOHN L., 43 562 Index CANADA, (See: Emigration, Amer- ican farmers) CAPITAL, emigration of, 491, 492, 510; immigration of, 522-523 CARLTON, FRANK TRACY, 61, 307, 308, 318, 330, 349, 35i CASTE PREJUDICE, against the immigrant, outgrowth of occu- pational stratification, 424 CHAPIN, ROBERT COIT, 240, 258, 260, 261 CHILD LABOR, 107, 318-324; Cot- ton mills: children under 14 in Northern and Southern, 321; children under 14 in principal States, 321; Decrease: of, con- temporaneous with the increase of immigration, 318; in States with a large immigrant popula- tion, 26; Defenders: of, in the South, 321; Foreign-born: per cent of, and per cent of children under 16 employed in factories in leading States, 319; Increase, during the World War, 508, 509 ; Parent nativity: of children, 10 to 15 years, in manufactures, by geographical divisions, 320; Shoe factories: c. 1. in, of rural Missouri, 322; South: more frequent in the, than in States with large immigrant popula- tion, 319; Substitute for immi- gration, 26, 321, 490, 527 CIVIL WAR, cost of living, 307; labor organizations, 330; wages, 307-308 CLAGHORN, KATE H., 65, 66, 357 CLOTHING INDUSTRY, 265-267 ; (See also: Family Budgets; Farmhouse Labor; Garment Workers); Growth: of, since 1890, 369; Hours of labor: in middle of nineteenth century, 363; Strikes: compared with average for all industries, 1887- !905, 373J Wages, real: of women in the past lower than to-day, 364, 365 CLOTHING WORKERS, (See: Gar- ment Workers) COAL, Demand: fluctuations in the, for, 432, 433, 434; Pro- duction: per capita, 105; by months, 433; and population, 419; in the U. S., 1880-1910, 416-417 COAL, BITUMINOUS, machine mined, per cent of, and per- centage of miners from Southern and Eastern Europe, by States, 429, 555 COAL MINERS, 414-457; Unem- ployed: and per cent foreign white, by States, 538; Westward movement: caused by the open- ing of new mining fields, 418 COAL MINERS, BITUMINOUS, Wage scale: in Pennsylvania, 1895- 1908, 441 ; Wages: by race and locality, 442 COAL MINES, (See also: Coal; Coal Miners ; Fatal Accidents ; Strikes ; Work Accidents) ; Competition: of unorganized native American mine workers, 447; Fatal acci- dents: in the U. S. and foreign countries, 469; Unemployment: part-time employment in lieu of, 434 COAL MINES, ANTHRACITE, (See also: Anthracite Coal Strike Commission; Strikes); Fatal accident rate: 1870-1909, 479, 556; Miners' unions: short lived prior to the New Immigra- tion, 455; Pro duction: of, 1870- 1909, 4371 Wage-earners: num- ber in, 1870-1909, 437 COAL MINES, BITUMINOUS, Days worked: average number of, and variation of the number of immigrant miners and laborers in Pennsylvania, 140, 141; Employees: number, 1880-1907, 420; Fatal accident rate: by nativity and causes, 474; by nativity and length of experi- ence, 477; compared with rail- roads, 485, 557; variation of the percentage of miners of Slavic and Italian parentage, 472, 527; Labor organizations, 445; Un- employment: ratio of, and per- centage of foreign-born miners, 134"; Wages, union scale of, 1898-1908, 440 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, (See : Labor Organizations, World War) Index 563 COMMISSARY STORE, (See: Com- pany Store) COMMONS, JOHN R., 62, 114, 289, 291, 298, 302, 307, 362, 454, 518 COMPANY HOUSES, 247, 248 COMPANY STORE, 272; Movement against: 1849-1897,444; in the South, 443 COMPETITION, IMMIGRANT, new immigrants not working for less pay than natives or older im- migrants, 401 CONGESTION, (See also: Housing Conditions; Tenement Houses); Boston: number of families per house, 1853-1900, 242; Dublin: c. in, 520; Effect: upon cost of living and wages, 240; Failure of the community: to provide safeguards against, 239; In- dustrial causes, 235; Ireland: c. in, 244; New York City: 229- 241; Old Immigration: 65; Race: not a factor, 237; Rear tenements, 233 CONTRACT LABORERS, importa- tion of, infrequent, 99, 394, 524; during the World War, 498-499, 530 COST OF LIVING, 240, 521, (See also: Wages and the Cost of Living) COTTON MILLS, 375-383, (See also: Child Labor); Earnings: of operatives, by sex and age, by principal States, 387; Hours of labor, 31 5; Strikes: much above the average in duration, 379; Unemployed: and foreign-born, 136, 540 CRAFT UNIONS, (See: Labor Or- ganizations) CRIME, 353, 358-361; Immigrants: alleged criminal proclivities of the, 358 ; no more criminal than native Americans, 359 ; Increase of immigration: coincident with decrease of c., 360 DANES, 79, 197, (See also: Scan- dinavians) DANGEROUS WORKING CONDI- TIONS, statistics of strikes against, 486 DAYS WORKED, Bituminous coal mines: d. w. collated with variation of number of immi- grant miners and laborers in Pennsylvania, 140, 141; Organ- ized trades: in the State of New York, and immigration, 1897- 1909, 144 DEMAND FOR LABOR, (See also: Agriculture; Labor Market); A griculture: 1 03-1 1 3 ; Charac- ter and volume of immigration: determined by, 102; Immigra- tion and emigration: regulated by, 3 ; Population of the United States : not increasing as fast as, 84 DENMARK, 16, 179, 202, 203-205, (See also: Northern and Western Europe) ; Decline of emigration: from, due to improvement in condition of people, 205; Eco- nomic conditions: of the peas- ants greatly improved since the '8o's, 203; Emigration: from, to the United States, 1820-1910, 203; Immigration: to, 204; Progress of manufacturing; 204 DESMOND, H. J., 73, 77 DISPLACEMENT, denned by the Oxford Dictionary, 149 DISPLACEMENT, RACIAL, 415 E EARNINGS, (See: Wages) EASTMAN, CRYSTAL, 460, 461, 467, 468, 481, 482, 484 EMIGRATION, American farmers: emigrating to Canada, 112; Immigration : compared with, 90, 557, 558; Industrial crisis, 1907-8, net e. during, 88; Monthly average: 1907-1909, 92; World War, net e. during, 498 EMPLOYMENT, Fluctuations of,i2i, 123, 137, 53i ENGELS, FRIEDRICH, 475-476 ENGLAND, (See: United Kingdom) ENGLISH AND WELSH, 166, 167, 168, 170, 171, 172, 262, 263, 264, 267, 268, 290, 326, 355, 356, 357, 395, 40i, 4U, 415, 425, 436, 437, 442, 447, 449, 545, 546 564 Index ENGLISH LANGUAGE, per cent foreign-born able to speak the, by years in the U. S., 58 F FAIRCHILD, HENRY PRATT, iv; 487; 515-517; 519-529 FALKNER, ROLAND P., 68, 69 FAMILY BUDGETS, Clothing: ex- penditure for, in families of un- skilled laborers, by income and nativity, 267; increases with earnings, 266; prices paid for, by recent immigrants the same as by native Americans, 265; race variations insignificant, 266; Deficit: annual, per work- ing family, by occupations, 1885,297,551; Food: expendi- tures for, by nativity and in- come, 258, 260, 262; in New York City, 260; Slav laborers, standards of, 259; Laborers: unskilled, classified by nativity and source of income, New Jersey, 1885, 550; Massachu- setts: 1800, 1830, and 1860, 549; Rent: paid by immigrants as high as, or higher than, that paid by native wage-earners, 250; by nativity, 254, 255; per person, in families without boarders, the same for native, and foreign-born, 254, 255; South Italians: food expendi- tures of, compared with Ameri- can families, 258; Surplus: of income over expenditure, by country of birth of families, 368; Wage-earners: classified by occupations, New Jersey, 1885, 550 FARMHOUSE LABOR, Competition: of, in the clothing industry, in '40*5 and '50*5, 365; Daughters of American farmers: working for less than cost of living, 365 FARMING, (See: Agriculture) FARM LABORERS, (See: Agricul- tural laborers) FATAL ACCIDENT RATE, (See also: Fatal Accidents); Anthracite coal mines: 1870-1909, 528; decrease simultaneous with in- crease of employment of Slavs and Italians, 478; Bituminous coal mines: 485; collated with variation of the per cent of miners of Italian and Slavic parentage, 472, 555; compared with railroads, 557; increase due to exhaustion of mines, 480; Coal mines: variation by States, 471; by causes and nativity, 474; by length of experience and nativity, 477; Foreign countries: compared with U. S., 469 FATAL ACCIDENTS, (See also: Fatal Accident Rate; Work Acci- dents); Coal mines: negligence of the miners, 480; Railroads: 485; Steel mills: speeding the cause of, 481 FITCH, JOHN A., 164, 395, 399~4oi, 405, 411-413, 520, 526, (See also: Pittsburgh Survey) FOERSTER, ROBERT F., 515-520, 525-527 FOOD, 256-265, (See also: Family Budgets) ; Food: Southern iron district: expenses of typical households for, 549; Immigra- tion Commission's data: 256, 257; Slavs: standards of the, compared with the U. S. Navy ration, 257 FOREIGN-BORN, Breadwinners: by grade of occupation and na- tionality, 172; immigration and emigration of, 1915-1919, 559; increase or decrease of, by occu- pation and nationality, 1890- 1900, Appendix, Table XI; In- crease: compared with immigra- tion, 88; from Scandinavian countries, compared with immi- grants from Southern and East- ern Europe, 1880-1910, 199 FRIDAY, DAVID, 497, 503, 504, 511 GARMENT WORKERS, 362-374, (See also: Clothing Industry) ; Jews: in the cities underbid by Amer- ican country workers, 372; La- bor organizations: affiliations of Jews and Italians with, in New York City above the average for ' the country, 326; more Index 565 effective than among other in- dustrial workers, 373 GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, 2, 3, 8, 12, 15, 52-54, 65, 66, 73, 76-78, 149, 162, 170-172, 180-196, 194, 228-233, 252, 253, 263, 275, 328, 357, 368, 369, 370, 374, 385, 395, 401, 414, 436, 442; Colonies: in the middle of the nineteenth century, 77 ; Congestion: in the settlements in old New York City, 65; Occupations: 1890- 1900, 170; Pennsylvania: in the colony of, 76; Tenement houses: unsanitary, in New York City colonies of, in the '60 's, 232 GERMANY, (See also: German Immigrants; Northern and Western Europe); i, 14, 43, 52, 178-180, 180-196, 255, 262, 267, 268, 355, 356, 386, 520, 545; Ad- vance: in the wages of farm labor, 189, 190; Agricultural progress: 189, 190; in 1895- 1910, 190; Coal: production of, per cent increase of, 1890-1909, 183; Coal miners: increase of annual earnings, 1890-1910, 1 86; Emigration: from, annual average, 1875-1910, 192; to countries outside of the U. S., 1890-1904, 195; net e. from, 1 80 ; of unskilled laborers to the U. S., increasing with the in- creased immigration to the U. S., from Southern and Eastern Europe, 192, 193; Foreign-born: by country of birth, 1880-1900, 545 ; engaged in gainful occupa- tions, 1900, 545; population of, 1 80; Immigration: to, exceeds emigration from, 180; to G. from Southern and Eastern Europe, 181, 520; Industrial expansion: 182, 520; Iron: production of, 1880-1910, 183; Labor: con- dition of, improved, 185; de- mand for, increased, 185; Mi- gration: of workers from Rus- sian Poland to G., 181; Rail- road mileage: growth of, and freight traffic, 1890-1900, 184; Trade-unions: 189; member- ship of, 1890-1910, 187 GREAT BRITAIN, i, 14, 17, 52, 179, 385, (See also: British Immi- gration; English and Welsh; Northern and Western Europe; United Kingdom) ; Immigra- tion: from, rise in 1897-1907, 213; Living conditions: im- provement of, 214; Real wages: 1850-1900, 215 / H HALL, PRESCOTT F., 41, 42 HAYNES, JOHN RANDOLPH, 462, 464, 469, 480, 481 HEBREWS, (See: Jews) HOFFMAN, P. L., 465, 466, 471, 474, 476, 477 HOLMES, JOSEPH A., 467, 468 HOME OWNERSHIP, 274-283, (See also: Apartment Houses); Ages: of home owners, 279-281; Bos- ton: 1845-1900, 277; Cities: with population of 50,000 and over, percentage of native white in, 278; Decreasing: with the growth of urban population, 282; with the increase of land values, 278; Irregularity of em- ployment: a bar to, 274; New immigrants: not long enough in the U. S. to have acquired homes, 282; Labor disputes: handicap in, 174; Laboring classes; not accessible to, 283; Old immigration: 277; Real estate: value of, 278-279; Ten- ancy: in Boston, 1790, 1845, 1890, and 1900, 276; Thrift: and h. o., 276 HOURS OF LABOR, 3ii~3i7, (See also: Clothing Industry); Agri- culture: no; American mill hands: native, in the ante- immigration period, 311, 312; Cotton mills: h. o. 1. reduced in, 315; Massachusetts: 1872-1903, 313; New immigration: 314; New York City: reduction of, compared with remainder of the State, 316, 317; Reduction: contemporaneous with immi- gration, 27; Sewing women: in the middle of the nineteenth century, 363; Steel industry: shorter hours for foreigners than for English-speaking skilled and semi-skilled .employees, 314 S 66 Index HOUSING CONDITIONS, 241-256, (See also: Congestion; Tene- ment Houses); Cause: of bad h. c. economic, not racial, 247; Germans: unsanitary h. c. of, in the past, 230-232; Immigra- tion Commission: tendency to shift the blame to the tenant, 249; Improvements: by Italians and Jews, 66; Irish: unsanitary h. c. of, in the past, 230-232; Italian district: improved h. c. in the, 66, 234; Jewish districts: improved h. c. in the, 66, 234; Landlords: responsibility of, 247; Native white: New Eng- land working girls in the '40*8, 241; sewing women, squalid h. c. in the past, 231; unskilled laborers in Southern mill towns, 246; Old immigration: cellar population in New York City, 230; Massachusetts towns, h. c. in, 243 ; rear tenements in New York City, 233; shanty dwell- ers in Massachusetts in the '70*5, 244; unsanitary tene- ments in Boston, 241, 242 HOWARD, EARL DEAN, 185, 186, 189, 190 HUNGARIANS, (See: Magyars, Slavs) HUNGARY, 98, 100 HUNTER, ROBERT, 40, 45 ILLINOIS, 11, 134, 135, 300, 301, 319, 334. 428-431, 433, 447, 44, 453, 471, 472, 473, 484, 534, T 535, 538, 539, 540, 554, 557 ILLITERACY, immigration from Bulgaria, Greece, Russia, and Servia compared with popula- tion of same countries, 71 ; Italian: statistics of, 80; Sta- tistics: 70, 80 IMMIGRANT COLONIES, Irish and German in middle of nineteenth century, 77 IMMIGRANTS, Connections: in the U. S., 94; Farmers: number of, negligible at all periods, 67; Imported: myth of, 3, 99; Occupations: per cent distribu- tion by, 1861-1910, 67; Old: majority unskilled, 67; Skilled: proportion of, same for last half- century, 67 IMMIGRATION, Annual average: by occupations, 1 86 1-1910, 503 ; Assisted: 96; Breadwinners, immigration and emigration of, 559, net i. of, 1915-1919, 498; Business conditions: and, 1880- 1910, 87; Compared: with emi- gration, 88, 546 ; Decline of, 493, 498; Monthly average: compared with immigration, 1907-1909, 92; Objections: to, 40; Old: compared with New, 6 1 -8 1 ; distribution, before 1840, 63; indentured servants, immigrants a century ago mostly, 62; Opposition: to, by organized labor antedates new, 78; to quantity not quality, 79; Quality of: European opinion, .72; Immigration Commission, conclusion of, 72; intellectu- ally average immigrant above average of countrymen at home, 70; standard not lowered, 69; Restriction of, probable effects of, 487-492; 511; Tractability: of old and new, 346; Volume: how regulated, 93 IMMIGRATION COMMISSION, Con- clusions: of the, 49, 72 ; contra- ' dieted by its statistics, 325 INDUCED IMMIGRATION, uncon- firmed tales of, 391 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY, Immigra- tion: and, 86; Population: and, for the past twenty years, 82 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Commis- sion on, 493, 494, 500 IRELAND, 2, 14, 17, 43, 65, 178, 179, 210, 215-221, 244, 245, 55.0, 551, (See also: Congestion; Irish; Northern and _ Western Europe; United Kingdom); Emigration: from, 1851-1908, 216; decreasing since 1 860, 2 1 6 ; by destination, 1876-1908, 217; Farm laborers: rise in wages of, 219; Housing: in rural areas, 186^-1901, 219; Land reform: effects of, 217, 218; Recent progress: 217-219 IRISH, 12-14, 17, 25, 52, 54, 57, 64-67, 69, 73, 77, 149, !6i, 166, Index 567 169-172, 178, 179, 2IO, 212, 229-232, 244, 247, 252, 253, 255, 260-263, 267, 275, 290, 295, 328, 355, 356, 357, 364, 365, 374, 385, 386, 394, 395, 401, 414, 415, 425, 436, 437, 442, 447, 449, 545, 546, (See also: Ireland) ; Congestion: in the settlements of New York City in the past, 65; Farm work: reluctance of the early immigrants toward, 66; Immi- grant colonies: in the middle of the nineteenth century, 77; Oc- cupations: in the U. S., 1890- 1900, 169; Pauperism: in Bos- ton, 1837-1845, 356; Standard of living: of early immigrants, 64; Sweatshops: in the 'so's, 364; Tenement houses: unsani- tary, in the I. colonies of New York City in the '6o's, 232 IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY, (See also: Iron and Steel Workers); Expansion: of, 158-160; Tech- nical revolution: in the, 399 IRON AND STEEL WORKERS, 394- 413, (See also: Aristocracy of Labor; Rolling Mills; Un- skilled Laborers); Amalga- mated Association: of, common laborers barred, 411; decline due to substitution of ma- chinery for skill, 412; Birds of passage: by race, 75; Crowding out: of English-speaking work- men by immigrants, none, 395; Earnings: in the Pittsburgh and Southern districts. 408; Eight- hour day: demand of the em- ployers, in th '8o's resisted, by the Amalgamated Association, 410, 411; Highly paid men: a small fraction of the force in the past, 395; Hours of labor: shorter for unskilled foreign- ers than for English-speaking skilled and semi-skilled, 314; Machinery: skill displaced by, 399; Months of employment: native and foreign-born male, by per cent distribution, 127; Race: 1880, 1890, and 1900, 159; 1890-1900, in the prin- cipal cities of the Middle West, 1 60; and skill, 402; Racial stratification: 402, 403; Skilled: earnings in Eastern and South- ern mills, 407; proportion of, 162; Sunday work: general rule before period of New Im- migration, 409; Twelve-hour day: insisted on by piece work- ers in the '8o's, 410, 411; Un- skilled: proportion of, 162; Wages: 403; in 1884, 396; in 1880-1908, 398, 553; by occu- pations, 1880-1908, 397; of skilled men higher in Pittsburgh with, than in the South with- out, immigrant competition, 405 ; of skilled men in the Pitts- burgh mills reduced since 1892, 403, 404; vary inversely with the ratio of recent immigrants, 408 IRREGULARITY OF EMPLOYMENT, migratory worker the product of, 435 ITALIANS, 3, 7, 15, 16, 20, 22, 32, 37, 43, 47, 65, 72, 79, 80, 85, 91, 99, 120, 162, 170-172, 193, 200, 201, 209, 234, 237, 238, 240, 253, 255, 258-263, 267-269, 290, 326, 328, 345, 349, 351, 355, 356-359, 368-371, 374, 385, 386, 388, 391, 394, 428, 437, 442, 443, 449, 450, 453, 458, 484, 545, 546, (See also: South Italians) ; Housing conditions: improved by, 66; improved in the I. district, 234; Illiteracy: statis- tics, 80; Labor organizations: affiliation of clothing workers with, above the average for the country, 326 ITALY, 32, 69, 72, 93, 181, 349, 350, 358, 359, (See also: Italians); Labor organizations: 349; agri- cultural, 350; Strikes: of agri- cultural laborers, 350 JENKS AND LAUCK, 43, 44, 65, 68, 84, 85, 126, 163, 164, 173, 245, 247, 248, 250, 251, 271, 272, 273, 275, 280, 285, 287, 288, 290, 302, 303, 346, 35i, 36o, 371, 458, 460 JENKS, JEREMIAH W., (See: Jenks and Lauck) JEWS, 3, 20, 25, 32, 65, 66, 71, 72, 228, 234, 238, 240, 253, 280, 568 Index 326, 328, 351, 356, 362, 363, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 374, (See also: Russians); Housing con- ditions: improved, in the J. districts, 66, 234; Labor organi- zations: affiliation of J. clothing workers with, in New York City above the average for the country, 326; Underbidding: of J. by American country work- ers, 372 LABOR, condition of, has not de- teriorated in the U. S., 23 LABOR AGENTS, before the immi- gration era, 119 LABOR ARISTOCRACY, (See: Aris- tocracy of Labor) LABOR COMPETITION, Immigrants: do not undercut union wages, 378; Southern white: keeping down the wages of immigrants in the North, 381 LABOR MARKET, immigration and the, 82-102, 498-500; mobility of labor, 499-5 LABOR ORGANIZATIONS, 325-352, (See also: Coal Mines; Cotton Mills; Garment Workers; Iron and Steel W9rkers; Woolen Mills); Bituminous coal mines: 445 ; Coal miners: non-English- speaking, affiliated with, 352, 353 ; union of, recognized by the Steel Trust, 453 ; Date of organi- zation: in principal industrial States, 334; Ephemeral: previous to 1880, 330; Garment workers: Jewish and Italian, union affilia- tions above the average for the country, 326; Growth: since 1890,333; Immigrants: discrim- ination against, 347; Immigra- tion: effects of, on 1. o., 376, 377; Machinery: effect upon craft unions, 351; Membership: na- tivity, 552; and immigration, New York State, 552; in the State of New York, and im- migration to the State of New York, 1897-1910, 336; foreign-born predominating in the '8o's, 330, 331; proportion of industrial wage-earners or- ganized, 340, 553; race not a factor, 327; rising and falling with rise and fall of immigra- tion, 30; Native Americans: aloofness from, 339; New York City: stronger than in the re- mainder of the State, 341, 343; New York State, stronger than in Kansas, 337, 339; Progress: greater progress coincident with the great tide of immigration, 3331 Proportion: organized, na- tives and immigrants, 327, 328; Recent immigrants: home train- ing in organization, 32, 349; organizing along industrial lines, 413; as strongly organized as natives and older immigrants, 327; Skilled: interests of, con- flict with those of the unskilled, 348; Unskilled: not eligible to membership in craft unions, 346; organization among the, 32, 349 LABOR PROBLEM, immigration not the cause of, 34 LABOR UNIONS, (See: Labor Or- ganizations) LABORERS, (See: Unskilled Lab- orers) LAUCK, W. JETT, 49, 265, 384, 388, 494, 495, 496, 501, 511, (See also: Jenks and Lauck) LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS, 33, 348, 384-393, (See also: Strikes; Wages; Woolen and Worsted Mills; Worsted Mills); strike of 1912, 348; and public opinion, 384 LEISERSON, WILLIAM M., 290, 44, 454 LITHUANIANS, 32, 55, 56, 57, 75, 228, 253, 328, 351, 368, 370, T 442, 456 LITMAN, SIMON, 502, 503 LIVING EXPENSES, (See: Family Budgets) LODGERS, (See: Boarders and Lodgers) M MACHINE MINING, (See also: Min- ing Machine) ; Bituminous coal: per cent of, machine mined, and per cent ratio of miners from Southern and Eastern Europe, Index 569 by States, 553; Economies: of, 426, 427 MACHINERY, (See also: Agricul- ture; Agricultural Laborers; Iron and Steel Workers); Ef- fects: in general, 231, 525, 526; upon craft unions, 351; Immi- gration: New, and, 289; sub- stitute for, 492 ; Rate of wages: introduction determined by, 290 MAGYARS, 162, 257, 442, 443, 449, 450, 458 (See also: Hungary) MANUFACTURES, wage - earners, 1879-1909, 151 MARX, KARL, 124, 125, 291 MASSACHUSETTS, 27, 138, 139, 174-176, 224, 225, 243, 244, 295, 300, 301, 311, 313, 314, 319, 321, 333, 334, 343, 344, 375, 378-380, 382, 383, 392, 523, 524, 534, 535, 540, 541, 551; Hours of labor: 1872-1903, 313; Immigrant breadwinners: destined for, 1897-1908, 139; Racial stratifi- cation: 1900-1905, 173; Strikes: 1830-1905, 344; Textile mills: percentage of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe employed in, 1880-1900, 370; Unemployment: of factory work- ers, and immigration, 139; Wages and cost of living: 1800, 1830, and i860, 295, 296, 521; in the '7o's, 295; Woolen mills: comparative statistics of strikes in, 392 MAYO-SMITH, RICHMOND, 46, 69, 89, 292 MIGRATORY WORKERS, created by irregularity of employment, 435 MINERS, (See also: Fatal Acci- dents: Labor Organizations; Unemployment); Native white: decrease of the number of, by States, 1890-1900, 158; Racial displacement: of natives by immigrants, none, 156, 157 MINING MACHINE, Pick miner: displaced by the, 425 ; Substitute for immigration: 425; Unskilled immigrants: employment of, the effect not the cause of the intro- duction of the m. m., 425 MITCHELL, JOHN, 41, 46 MITCHELL, WESLEY C., 308, 507 MONEY SENT ABROAD, by immi- grants, 269; mercantilist objec- tion to, 271 N NATIONALITIES, principal, of male breadwinners classified by occu- pation groups, 1900, 171 NATIVE-BORN, decrease of, by occupations, 1890-1900, 152 NATIVE BREADWINNERS, decrease ofi by occupations in Mass., 1900-1905, 175 NATIVE WHITE, of native parent- age, males, decrease in selected occupations, compared with loss by death, 1890-1900, 153 NEARING, SCOTT, 293, 302, 519 NEGROES, migration of, during the World War, 507, 508 NEW IMMIGRATION, compared with the Old, 61-81 NEW YORK CITY, 7, 20, 25, 28, 32, 63, 66, 67, 119, 120, 121, 149, 229-241, 260, 316, 317, 326, 335, 337, 340-343, 354-357, 3^3, 365, 367, 369, (See also: Family Budgets; Congestion); Cellar population: of the '40*3, 230; Congestion: in the Irish and German settlements of the past, 65 ; Hours of labor: reduc- tion of, compared with the remainder of the State, 316,317; Labor organizations: affiliation of Jewish and Italian clothing workers with, above the average for the country, 326; member- ship of, compared with New York State, 341, 343; Pauper- ism: lodgers at the municipal lodging nouses, by nativity, 1908, 355; Paupers: nativity, 1854-1860, and 1885-1895, 356; by nativity and cause, 356, 357 NEW YORK STATE, 27, 31, 140, 143, 144, 146, 300, 301, 315-317, 319, 32i, 335-343, 36o, 383, 534, 535, 540, 554, 555; Hours of labor: compared with New York City, 317; Membership of labor organizations: compared with Kansas, 339; compared with New York City, 342, 343; per- centage of wage-earners organ- ized, 1900-1909, 553; rising and 570 Index falling with immigration, 335, 55 2 NEWSHOLME, ARTHUR, 226, 528 NORTHERN AND WESTERN EU- ROPE, Emigration: from, 177- 220; causes of decrease, 13; cannot keep pace with demand for labor in the U. S., 177; Im- migration: to the United States could not replace immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, 220 NORWAY, 179, 202-203, (See also: Northern and Western Europe) ; Immigration: from, to the U. S., 202; greatest in 1901-1910, 202; Recent industrial development: 202 NORWEGIANS, 52, 197, 252, 253, 264, (See also: Norway; Scan- dinavians) OCCUPATIONS OF IMMIGRANTS, (See: Immigrants) OLD IMMIGRATION, (See: Immigra- tion) OPPOSITION TO IMMIGRATION, (See: Immigration) PAUPERISM, 353~358; Decrease: during period of greatest im- migration, 353; Industrial in- validism: p. due to, 357; New immigration: p. less frequent among the, than among the Old, 354; New York City: lodgers at municipal lodging houses, by nativity, 1908, 355; Racial displacement: p. not due to, 355, 356; Unemploy- ment: a minor cause of p., 357 PAUPERS, English and Irish: 1837- 1845, 356; New York City: nativity of p., in the past, 356, 357 PEARSON, KARL, 226, 528 PENNSYLVANIA, 6, 9, 11, 33, 100, 119, 134, 135, 140, 141, 151, 249, 300, 301, 319, 321, 343, 344, 371, 372, 383, 414, 415, 419-422, 428-431, 437, 439, 442, 445, 446, 449, 454-456, 461, 462, 466, 471-473, 48o, 481, 534, 535, 538- 549, 555-557; (See also: Coal Mines, Bituminous; Coal Mines, Anthracite) ; Bitumi- nous coal mines: days worked, and number of immigrant min- ers and laborers, 141 ; Strikes: 1835-1905, 344 PHILADELPHIA, 25, 363, 372 PITTSBURGH, 24, 306, 394, 401- 410, 439, 454, 460, 484 PITTSBURGH SURVEY, 164, 306, 395, 399-402, 406, 411-413, 454, 460 PLUNKETT, HORACE, 218 POLAND, 56, 100, 181, 182, 190 POLES, 14, 16, 32, 54, 55, 57, 59, 60, 75, 99, 162, 170, 171, 172, 181, 182, 190, 228, 238, 251, 253, 269, 328, 368, 369, 370, 378, 380, 385, 386, 442, 456, 471; Eng- lish-speaking, by years in the U. S., 78 PRATT, EDWARD EWING, 235-239, 276, 341 PREJUDICE, against immigrants in the past, 73 PRICES, control of, 306, 510, 511 8UAINTANCE, H. W., IO3, IO9, IIO UALITY OF IMMIGRATION, (See Immigration) RACE CLASSIFICATION, fallacy of the, adopted by the Immigra- tion Commission, 250 RACE DISTINCTION, dominant'idea of the investigation of the Im- migration Commission, 55 RACE PREJUDICE, motive of oppo- sition to recent immigrants, 457 RACE SUICIDE, 221-227; Birth rate: Commission of Inquiry into the Declining, report of, 226-227; decline of, among the better- to-do, 226; among the English aristocracy, 528; de- cline of, begins in 1810-1830, 2237 native, decreasing with rural population, 224; rise in social condition cause of decline of, 226; varies inversely with income, 226; Walker's theory Index of the decline in the native, 221, 528; Immigration: unrelated to, 18; Universal: among social classes not affected by immi- grant competition, 226; Wat- son's forecast: of the population of the U. S., 222, 223; World- wide: 224 RACIAL DISPLACEMENT, (See also: Racial Stratification); Laborers: none, of native, by immi- grants, 156, 157; Miners: none, of native, by immigrants, 156, 157; Native Americans: em- ployed in increased numbers with increasing immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, 158, 1 60; Negligible: 151, 152, 176 RACIAL STRATIFICATION, 148-176, 150, 151; Massachusetts: 1900- f905 J 73J Occupations: read- justment on the scale of, 170; Shifting: of English and Welsh, Irish and Germans, from lower paid to more remunerative occupations, 165 RAILROAD EMPLOYEES, wages of, 1891-1909, 304 REAL WAGES, (See: Wages) RENT, of native American wage- earners in small towns lower than that of immigrant workers in large cities, 255; increase of, 502, (See also: Family Budgets) RIPLEY, WILLIAM Z., 224 ROBERTS, PETER, 259, 444, 445, 455, 456, 481 ROLLING MILLS, (See also: Iron and Steel Industry, Iron and Steel Workers), Laborers: wages of, 1884-1902, 398; Rates of wages: classification of em- ployees by, 1884, 396 Ross, EDWARD A., 140 RURAL DEPOPULATION, 103-104; migration of native American stock to city, 104; relative and absolute, 103 RURAL TERRITORY, decrease of the population of, 1900-1910, 104 RUSSIA, 32, 69, 71, 146, 1 81, 349- 351; strikes in, 349; unem- ployment insurance, 146 RUSSIANS, 32, 71, 75, 190, 228, 238, 255, 260, 262, 263, 264, 267, 268, 351, 354, 355, 357, 369, 370, 385, 386, 388, (See also: Jews) SABATH, A. J., 347 SAVINGS, Of immigrants: disposi- tion of, does not affect American wage-earners, 271; investments in their home countries, 270; Of wage-earners: small margin of .income left for, 267 SCANDINAVIANS, i, 16, 178, 196- 201, 355, 386, 548; (See also: Danes, Norwegians, Swedes) ; Competing with new immigrants: 200, 20 1 ; Immigration to the United States: of breadwinners highest in 1901-1910, 196; 1881-1910, 196; course of, turned eastward, 197, 198; In- crease: of, in the U. S., by geographic division, 1880-1910, 198, 199; In the United States: compared with Southern and Eastern Europeans by States, 1880, 1890, 1900, and 1910, 545; Occupations: 1881-1910, 20 1 ; Recent immigrants: mostly not of the family type, 197 Scisco, Louis Dow, 73, 77 SCOTCH, 12, 52, 75, 161, 171, 172, 252, 253, 264, 355, 356, 414, 415, 442, 447, 545, 546; immigra- tion not decreased, 173 SCOTLAND, (See: United Kingdom) SIMONS, A. M., 62, 63, 115 SLAVS, Food: standards of, com- pared with United States navy rations, 257; Organization: ca- pacity for, 455, 456; Wages: of unskilled laborers increased, 453, 454 SOUTH ITALIANS, 75, 247, 249, 251, (See also: Italians); Food expenditures: compared with Americans generally, 258; with native white workers in the South, 258 STANDARD OF LIVING, 228-273, (See also: Boarders and Lodgers; Congestion; Family Budgets); Children's earnings: source of higher s. o. 1., maintained by Americans and Americanized families, 22, 285; Old immigra- 572 Index tion: standard low, 64; Race standard: existence of, not proved, 264; Recent immigrants: standard of, not inferior to that of their predecessors, 19 STEAMSHIP AGENTS, effect of so- licitation by, negligible, 97 STEEL MILLS, (See: Iron and Steel Workers; Rolling Mills) STEEL WORKERS, fatal accidents, speeding the cause of, 481, (See also: Iron and Steel Workers; Rolling Mills) STEERAGE RATES, effect of recent increase upon quality of im- migration, 69 STRATIFICATION, OCCUPATIONAL, caste prejudice against the immigrant, the outgrowth of, 424 STREIGHTOFF, F. N., 246, 248, 255, 276, 294 STRIKE BREAKERS, native Ameri- cans as, 345; recent immi- grants as, 346 STRIKES, (See also: Clothing In- dustry; Cotton Mills; Strike Breakers; Woolen Mills); An- thracite coal mines: 1902, 456; Coal mines: Southern and East- ern Europeans identified with every strike in, 447, 448; Immigrants: have stood by the unions, 378; Immigration: and, 1886-1905, 345 ; increasing with, 344; Lawrence, Massachusetts: 392; Massachusetts: 1830-1905, 344; More numerous: since 1881, 343, 344; Pennsylvania: 1835- I9<>5 344; Russia: 349; Woolen and worsted mills: comparative statistics of s. in, 392; World War, s. during, 505 SUMNER, HELEN L., 115, 120, 230, 241, 363, 364, 365, (See also: Women in Industry) SUNDAY WORK, (See: Iron and Steel Workers) SUNDBARG, GUSTAV, 2OI, 2O6, 2O7 SUTHERLAND, HUGH, 217, 218, 220 SWEATSHOPS, Irish, in the 'sp's, 364; older than immigration, 362 SWEDEN, 16, 179, 205-209, (See also: Northern and Western Europe) ; Emigration: from cities and rural districts, 1881-1907, 206; by destination, 1861-1908, 205; Immigration: to, 206; 1881- 1908, 207; Recent industrial development: 207; Rural emi- gration: decline of, due to small demand for farm help in the U. S., 205, 206 SWEDES, 52, 75, 79, 161, 170-172, 197, 255, 262, 267, 268, 328, (See also: Scandinavians; North- ern and Western Europe) TENEMENT HOUSES, (See also: Congestion; Home Ownership; Housing Conditions); One-fam- ily residence: made over into, 229; Past and present: in Bos- ton, 241 ; Unsanitary conditions: in the old Irish and German col- onies of New York City, 232 TEXTILE MILLS, percentage of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe employed, 1880-1900, 379 TRACTABILITY, of old and new immigrants, 346 TRADE-UNIONS, (See also: Labor Organizations) ; mostly confined to skilled occupations, 346, 377 TRZCINSKI, J., 181, 191 TWELVE-HOUR DAY, (See: Iron and Steel Workers) UNDESIRABLE IMMIGRATION, defi- nitions of, 41 UNEMPLOYMENT, 114-147; Aus- tralia: 145; Bituminous coal miners: 132; collated with vari- ation of the percentage of for- eign-born miners, 134; Causes: 4, 114-125; Coal mines: part time employment in lieu of u., 434; Cotton mills: 132; Cyclical variations: 1888-1908, in Mas- sachusetts, 138; Factory workers: u^_ among, and immigration, Massachusetts, 139; Foreign- born: variation of the percentage of, collated with u., by areas, 130,131; by geographical divi- sions, 128; in inverse ratio to u., Index 573 129; Immigration: and u., 125- 147, 432, 433, 434; not a con- tributory cause of, 145; varies inversely with, 5; Labor reserve: 123, 125; Manufactures: aver- age number of male wage- earners employed, by months, 118; variations by States, 129; Measure: of, 121, 125; Monthly variations: in the State of New York, 1902-1909, 125; 1916- 1918, 558: Native: and foreign- born workmen equally affected by, 126; Occupational varia- tions: 131; collated with per cent of foreign-born, 133, 508; Restriction of immigration: no relief for u., 35, 488, 489; Remedy: 146; Seasonal varia- tions: 115; Unskilled laborers: 132; Working days: number of, in New York, 1897-1908, 142, 143 ; in Pennsylvania coal mines, 1901-1909, 140 UNITED KINGDOM, 178, 209-215, 520-522, (See also: Ireland; Northern and Western Europe) ; Emigration by destination: gross, 1840-1909, 212, 546; net, 1895- 1909, 213, 214; Immigration: to the U. S., from, 1890-1909, not below normal, 213 UNITED MINE WORKERS, (See also: Coal Miners; Labor Organiza- tions); growth of, 447; wage conferences with mine operators in the bituminous coal fields, T 439, 450 UNSKILLED LABORERS, (See also: Agriculture; Family Budgets; Hours of Labor; Housing Con- ditions; Illiteracy; Iron and Steel Workers; Labor Organiza- tions; Occupations of Immi- grants; Racial Displacement; Rolling Mills; Slavs; Unem- ployment; Woolen and Worsted Mills); Craft unions: barred from, 346; interests conflicting with, 348; Displacement: of native, by immigrants, none, J 5 6 J 57; Increase: of the number of, by race and nativity, 1890-1900, 156; Iron and steel mills: wages rising, 397; Pre- dominant among the immigrants: 68; economic reason for, 19; Rolling mills: wages in 1884- 1902, 398 ; Slav: food standards, 259; Unemployed: and per cent foreign-born, 136, 538; Wages: in agriculture and other pur- suits, in; in the past, 295 UNSKILLED WORKERS, (See: Un- skilled Laborers) W WAGE-EARNERS, in manufactures, 1879-1909, 151 WAGES, 284-310, (See also: Coal Miners; Coal Mines; Conges- tion; Cotton Mills; Iron and Steel Workers; Wages and the Cost of Living; Woolen and Worsted Mills) ', Advancing: more slowly than the cost of living, 26; with the employment of large numbers of immigrants, 24; Agricultural laborers: com- pared with other unskilled, no, in; Building trades, 521; Cler- ical help: w. of, low, 304; Coal mines: 305; Cotton mills: 1875- 1908, 375, 376; upward move- ment of w. since period of New Immigration, 375; Country com- petition: daughters of American farmers working for less than the cost of living, 365; native Americans undercut wages of immigrants, 298; Difference: in, due to grade of service not to country of birth, 284; not de- termined by distinction of race, 288, 289; Earnings: annual, of male and female employees in manufactures, and proportion of foreign-born, in principal States, 300, 301; variation by States, 299; Immigrants: do not undercut w., 23, 378; female, earnings of, higher than those of native Americans, 370; re- cently landed, not engaged at less than the prevailing rates, 285; Increase: actual, result of industrial expansion, 302; hy- pothetical, without immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, 306; Laborers: in the '40*5, 295 ; in rolling mills, 1 884- 574 Index 1902, 398; Large and small cities: comparative w. in, 299; Older employees: w. of, kept up by immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, 309; Past: real w. of sewing-women lower than to-day, 364, 365; Purchas- ing power, of, during the war, 500-504; Railroad employees: 303; Relation of rent: to, 250; Scarcity of labor: effect of, 489, 521; Southern white competition: tends to keep down the w. of immigrants in the North, 383; Statistics: defects of w., 293; Steel mills: 305; in 1880-1908, 553; Urban and rural manufac- tures: 298; Worsted mills: at Lawrence, w. of skilled and unskilled operatives in, 1889- 1909, 389 WAGES AND THE COST OF LIVING, in Massachusetts, 1800, 1830 and 1860, 295, 296; during the Civil War, 307, 308; in the 'jo's, 295; in the '8o's, 297; during the World War, 500- 504 WALES, (See: United Kingdom) WALKER, FRANCIS A., 18, 61, 64, 65, 221-223, 251 WARNE, FRANK JULIAN, 447, 453 WATSON, ELKANAH, 222, 223 WELSH, 12, 13, 52, 75, 161, 252, (See also: English and Welsh) WEYL, WALTER E., 46 WILLCOX, WALTER F., 223, 224 WILLIAMS, WILLIAM, 69 WILLIS, H. PARKER, 51 WOMEN IN INDUSTRY, 107, 115, 120, 230, 241, 312, 313, 345, 363, 508, (See also: Sweatshops; Wages) WOOLEN AND WORSTED MILLS, 384-393; Americans of native stock: coming back to, since arrival of new immigrants, 387; not forced out by recent im- migrants, 385; number of, employed at Lawrence, 1900- 387; Recent immigrants: strike record of, 392; Strikes: comparative statistics of, 392; Wages: at Lawrence, 1889-1909, 389; stationary prior to the New Immigration, increasing since, 388 ; of unskilled laborers increased at higher rate than those of skilled operatives, 388, 389 WORK ACCIDENTS, 458-486, (See also: Fatal Accident Rate; Fatal Accidents); Coal mines: Americans, compared with Irish, 57; carelessness of mine man- agers, 465; cause of, competi- tion among coal operators, 29, 467, 468; increasing with prog- ress in engineering, 466; Irish, compared with Americans, 57; Lithuanians, compared with Poles, 55; opinions of experts on the causes of, 462; Poles, compared with Lithuanians, 55; preventable by legislation and efficient inspection, 468, 469; prevention of, expensive, 464; Railroads: compared with coal mines, 484; Responsibility: for, shifted to recent immigrants, 458, 459 WORKING DAYS, average number, per man increased with recent immigration, 436, 437 WORLD WAR, lessons of, 493-511; Child labor: increase of, 508, 509; Collective bargaining: 505; Con- trpct laborers: 498-499, 530; Emigration: net, 498; Immigra- tion and emigration: 558 ; Strikes: 505; Wages and the cost of liv- ing: 500-504; Women in indus- try: 508 WORSTED MILLS, (See: Woolen and Worsted Mills) ZAHN, FRIEDRICH, 180, 183, 185, 186, 189-191 THE END 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED LOAN DEPT. RENEWALS ONLY TEL. NO. 642-3405 This book is due on the last date stamped below, or on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. ^2 6 '69 -a AM LOAM DEPT. RBTURNEr ro APR I 8 19?n MWNMlBW LD 21A-38m-5,'68 (J401slO)476B AUTO.DISC.APR27 '87 MAY DEC.OH987 General Library University of California Berkeley A, 93351 U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES 6003017855 - - ffy&k . % *,: .-. .- *v .- ^ . < UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY * * i *" ..