LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Class 1861-62 Master CHARLES LAWSON of Borthwick Hall Old Master-GEORGE LORIMER Assistants JOHN MOINET JAMES RITCHIE JOHN MILLER JOHN MACKAY JAMES ROBERTSON THOMAS G. STEVENSON ROBERT CHISHOLM FRANCIS RICHARDSON WILLIAM CATTANACH JAMES S. DUNCAN ROBERT BRYSON Treasurer JOHN MENZIES Clerk THOMAS STRONG, W.S. Ecclesiastical Commisisoner CHARLES LAWSON of Borthwick Hall Paving Board Coiijiin WILLIAM BEATTIE Accountant JAMES M. MACANDREW, C A. Medical Referee JAMES D. GlLLESPIE, M.D. Parliamentary Solicitors in London MAITLAND & GRAHAM Officer ARCHIBALD PATERSON 1 The Merchant Company of Edinburgh From CHARLES LAWSON MASTER The Geographical Distribution of Material Wealth BY ALEXANDER KEITH JOHNSTON, F.R.S.E. \\ GEOGRAPHER TO THE QUEEN FOR SCOTLAND II. HISTORICAL NOTES REGARDING THE MERCHANT COMPANY OF EDINBURGH AND THE WIDOWS' SCHEME AND HOSPITALS V (, F THE UNIVERSITY EDINBURGH PRIVA TE PRESS OF PETER LA WSON & SON M.DCCC.LXII. Tf uRAL TO THE MEMBERS OF THE MERCHANT COMPANY. N retiring from the Office ^MAS- TER of the MERCHANT COMPANY, which I have twice held with so much pleasure to myself y and in thanking you for the uniform kindness and support which I have received at your hands, I take this op- portunity of offering for your acceptance the present 189251 IV Address. present Volume, containing (i) the valuable Left u re, delivered by my friend Mr Keith Johnston, at the Conversazione, which you did me the honour to attend in April last ; and (2) some Historical Notes as to the rise, progress, and present position of the Merchant Company. Desirous of presenting the Lecture in as attractive a form as the limited resources of a Private Printing Press would admit of, 1 have called in the aid of our talented young townsman Mr Clark Stanton, to illustrate the different headings. Although the Company, to which we have the privilege to belong, is entitled to the term antient as well as honourable, no printed Account is extant, which can convey to our younger Address. younger Members any idea of the very im- portant position it has occupied from its ear- liest days, nor of the part it has taken, from time to time, in all the leading questions which have engaged the attention of the mercantile community. This I considered to be a great desideratum ; and on mentioning it to Mr A. K. Mackie, the Assistant of our excellent Clerk, he at once offered to prepare some Notes on the subjeff of the Company's early history, to accompany Mr Keith Johnston's Lecture ; and to him, therefore, the Members are indebted for the interesting Historical Notes, which form the Second Part of this Volume. In the sincere hope and assurance that the Merchant Company will go on prospering as it has vi Address, has hitherto done, and that the noble Hospitals under its charge may continue to flourish, I subscribe myself, in all truth and sincerity, Tour 'very faithful Servant, CHARLES LARSON, Master. BORTHWICK HALL, istSept. 1862. Table of Contents. PART I. THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIAL WEALTH. PAGE Introduction I Contents The Mineral Kingdom 18 The Vegetable Kingdom 45 The Animal Kingdom 81 Curiosities of Commerce 101 PART II. HISTORICAL NOTES REGARDING THE MERCHANT COMPANY OF EDINBURGH. The Merchant Company I Charter of Charles II __ 8 Original Rules 17 The Widows' Scheme 95 The Merchant Maiden Hospital 107 George Watson's Hospital liz Gillespie's Hospital and Free School 118 Grindlay's Trust 122, Daniel Stewart's Hospital 124 Vll Vlll Contents. Contents APPENDIX. PAGE. 1. List of the Members since 1 68 1 i 2. Number of Members admitted from 1777 to 1862 xxiv 3. Masters of the Company since 1 68 1 xxv 4. Treasurers of the Company since 1 681 xxvi 5. Copy of Charter of George III., dated 1777 xxviii 6. An Act for enlarging the Powers of the Company of Merchants of the City of Edinburgh, 1798 xxxii 7. An Act to amend an Act for enlarging the Powers of the Company of Merchants of the City of Edinburgh, 1827 xxxviii 8. Extract from Burke's Peerage xlv 9. Report of Conversazione, at which Mr Keith Johnston's Lecture was delivered xlvi ILLUSTRATIONS. FROM THE DESIGNS OF CLARK STANTON. Presentation Plate. Engraved by R. Paterson Vignette Heading The Mineral Kingdom The Vegetable Kingdom The Animal Kingdom The Curiosities of Commerce.. Emblematic Heading the Stock of Broom and Insignia R. Paterson J. R. Corner W. M. Williams J. Borders R. Paterson R. Paterson MAP. PHYSICAL AND COMMERCIAL CHART OF THE WORLD. By Alexander Keith Johnston, F.R.S.E. PHYSICAL ft. COM MERC L CHAKT -JOJF WORLB r. x [> I ,i ii a t KIII ' rr;:-n . T.it'le- lands ^ ]/Lfnntairix 'ftn 'Vn GolcLtm Sihermm Iron ^ /',ii mm HEN my esteemed friend, the MASTER, invited me to read an Address to the Mem- bers of the Antient Company of Merchants, my first idea, on thinking over a subject, was, that we might spend an agreeable hour together in performing an imaginary tour round the world, calling in at those maritime seats of trade, the names of which are more familiar in our tables of imports and exports ; IntrodudHon Geographical Distribution of exports; and making an occasional journey into the interior of countries by means of na- vigable rivers, or by caravan routes in the eastern, and railways in the western hemisphere. Beginning at the cradle of navigation, and the birth-place of all that is great in the early history of human progress, we might have crept cautiously along the shores of the Le- vant, or, sailing from Tyre, the antient c< Queen of the Ocean," with Phoenicians for our pilots, and the stars for our guides, we might have ventured out beyond the Pillars of Hercules, and, steering a dubious course to the north-west, have visited the semi-barbarous in- habitants of a misty and half mythic island, called Britain, to barter with them for the tin of Cassiterides, the only exportable article their poor country afforded. Then, turning in another direction, we might have taken passage on board of one of King Solomon's Material Wealth. Solomon's ships of Tarshish, which left the port of Eziongeber once in three years, and, aided by the south-west monsoon, have rowed eastward across the Arabian Sea to the far dis- tant Land of Ophir ; ruminating as we went on the revolutions of Empires, which, in the course of ages, have placed so large a portion of that once renowned golden region under the sceptre of our Sovereign Lady Victoria, the beloved and revered Queen of England, and Empress of India.* On our return voyage, bringing gold, silver, and ivory, we might have amused ourselves with the " apes and pea- cocks" which formed important items in the royal traders' bill of lading. Once more on terra firma^ and mounting our camels, we might * The Ophir of Scripture was probably the western coast of India j and the name may have extended to the Malay Peninsula, where the word ' Ophir' means a gold mine. Ceylon is believed to be the Tar- shish of Solomon. B 2 Ophir Early Voyagers Geographical Distribution of might have joined company with the Ishmaelite caravan, which, laden with spices and balm from Gilead, carried Joseph into Egypt, to learn from him there a lesson on the manage- ment of our surplus stores in times of scarcity. With Bartolomeo Diaz, we might have doubled the " stormy cape," afterwards the better omened Cape of Good Hope, and predicted, in consequence, the ruin of the lucrative trade from the east by Aden and the Red Sea. By and bye, we might have met with Christopher Columbus, and, entering into his enlightened views, would have embarked in one of his cara- vels at the port of Palos, in Andalucia. We would have shared the terror of his companions as they ploughed through the Sargasso Sea, a meadow in mid-ocean ; but, sustained by the unwavering faith of the great commander, we would have glided gently across what he called the Ladies' Gulf (// golfo de las damas), till, in Material Wealth. in the prophetic words of his dream, we " un- cc barred the gates of ocean ;" and, making our landfall at Watling Island, would have taken part in the discovery of a new world. We would have knelt with Nunez de Balbao, in silent admiration, as from the summit of the Isthmus of Panama he gazed for the first time on the great Southern Ocean ; and, plunging his drawn sword into its waters, took possession, in the name of Spain, of all the lands on its borders. With the intrepid Magellan, we might have passed through the strait that bears his name into the same vast ocean which he found and called the Pacific, and, returning by the Philippines and the Cape, would have witnessed the first circumnavigation of the globe, by which its spherical form was satisfac- torily demonstrated. Then, tracing out the blood-stained career of Pizzaro, and noting the rapidly increasing power and growing avarice Columbus Raleigh and Drake Geographical Distribution of avarice of the Spaniards, their cruel treatment of the noble Montezuma and the peaceful Incas, we would have foreseen the decadence which was sure to follow the fortunes of that State which thus raised itself on the ruin of others. Or, coming nearer home, we might have shared in the enthusiasm of the brave spirits of Elizabeth's time, accompanying Ra- leigh to the land of the far west, which he named after his virgin queen : sympathising with him on the failure of his attempt to dis- cover the often sought, but ever evanescent El Dorado ; helping Drake to lighten the Spanish galleons of their ill-gotten plate and treasure from the port of Acapulco, or witness- ing the destruction of an entire fleet in the Bay of Cadiz, when he and Raleigh returned the compliment intended for us by Philip and his Invincible Armada ! Thus floating down the stream of time, we would have seen navi- gation Material Wealth. gation become a great science, earnestly studied by every enlightened people ; travelling, even in the desert, a pastime participated in by num- bers of the gentler sex ; and commerce gradu- ally developed into a mighty power, engaging the activities of millions, and constantly tend- ing to unite, in one common brotherhood, the scattered family of man. But a little reflection convinced me that this is too large a theme ; that long before we could have completed our circuit, your patience and my time would, alike, have been exhausted ; and second thoughts suggested a more rapid bird's-eye view of the world, looking chiefly at the dis- tribution of material wealth over its surface, in its bearings on commerce and navigation. To this, therefore, I now beg to direct your attention. The term material wealth, as here employed, is meant to embrace all those substances of the natural Material wealth Geographical Distribution of Distribution of wealth natural kingdoms which, whether as raw mate- rials for our manufactures, as necessaries and luxuries for our tables, or ornaments for our toilets, are the objects of commercial enterprise. These substances are so distributed throughout the vast storehouse of nature, that no country, however favoured as to climate and soil, is so rich that it can lay claim to a monopoly ; and none, however apparently barren, is so poor that it cannot add something to the general store. If China furnishes our teas and the Moluccas our spices, Iceland contributes its wool, and Siberia its furs. This beneficent arrangement, while it evinces forethought and design on the part of the Great Architect, affords a proof that the earth was created for the occupation of man as a social being, de- pending for his happiness and his progress on his fellow men. But for this disposition, which sent us to seek for the oil that fed our domestic lamp Material Wealth. lamp to seas within the arctic circle, and scat- tered gold over the surface of Australian wilds, the Greenlander might have been left to pine alone within his ice-girt shores, and the savage of the southern continent might have disap- peared from the face of the globe before the lineaments of his peculiar physiognomy had been photographed for the benefit of future ethnologists. For an explanation of the manner of this distribution, in so far as it can be ex- plained by natural causes, we must look to the facts and deductions of Physical Geography; that interesting branch of knowledge, a com- pound of many of the sciences, which, freed from the trammels of the old cosmography and the more modern routine of analysis, regards our planet not merely as the theatre of man's exploits the scene of his ambition and his crimes, with boundaries traced in blood but as the green earth, fresh from the hands of its Maker, Physical Geography 10 Geographical Distribution of Mountains Maker, whose boundaries are the engirdling waters and the everlasting hills. Physical Geography teaches that there is a majestic harmony in the distribution of the grand masses which form the solid portions of the earth's crust; that these masses are simple in their original types, and that these types have a constant tendency to repeat themselves, as ob- served in the tapering of all the great peninsulas towards the south. But the most prominent characteristic features of the present condition of our planet are the great mountain chains, which, as apparent on the map, form two principal classes: those in the Old World, Asia, with its peninsular prolongation Europe, and the Barbary States ; which extend, with few excep- tions, in the direction of the parallels, or from west to east; and those of the New World, America, which run on the line of the meridians, or from south to north. The map Material Wealth. 1 1 map is so coloured as to convey a general idea of the structure of the globe; the deep green colour is meant to indicate plains and low lands, extending from the level of the sea to 300 or 400 feet above that level ; and the pale green, up to 500 or 600 feet. The pale brown marks out rising grounds, table-lands, and mountain slopes, up to about i ooo feet ; and the dark brown and black, all above this to 29,000 feet, the cul- minating point of the whole. The portions of the mountains which, in nature, are covered with perpetual snow, are marked white on the dark ground; these snow-white patches indicate the highest points of a system, the sites of true glaciers and the sources of great rivers.* Cen- tral Asia is traversed by the highest mountains on the globe, and these support vast table-lands rising * These explanations refer to the large Physico-Commercial Map, now in the Industrial Museum of Scotland. The scale of the sketch map attached is too small to shew particular features. Map explained 12 Mountains and Plains Geographical Distribution of rising to an elevation of 15,000 feet above the sea. In America, the high-lands form a nar- row band extending along its western shores, while the central and eastern portions, almost from the north to the south pole, are occupied by plains, interrupted only by comparatively low hills. There is a remarkable connexion between the configuration of a continent and the civiliza- tion of its tribes and peoples. Mountain chains extending along the parallels of latitude give rise to greater differences between nations than those which stretch along the meridians of longitude ; a circumstance which also affects the fauna and flora of a region. Hence, almost all mixtures of nations and languages have occurred along meridional lines of moun- tains, and the course of war and conquest have been modified by the same cause. Arnold says truly, that Cf the whole character of a Cf nation Material Wealth. " nation may be influenced by its geology and . Craighead William Cock Ja. Smeton Thomas Crichton Georg Bell Geo. M'Kenzie James Bowden Alex. Campbell Rob. Campbell W. Cuninghame Alx. Lessells Jon. Richie Jo. Hunter Thomas Ker Georg Balfour A. Blair John Tennent Hugh Blackie D. Falconer James Clerk John Clerk James Loch Ha. Elphunstone Tohn Cauve Robert Baird Jo. Drummond Jo. Nasmyth Hugh Campbell James Tait David Estoun G. Urummond Laurence Donaldsone James Fergus Arch. Walker Jo. Brown Ja. Gib Ja. Row John Hall James Aitkine Andrew Irvine George Funnestowne Alexander Chanceler W. Neilsone John Corsbie Da. Allan Rob. Lauder Rot. Gibson John Armstrong Stephen Bromfield John Henderson Tho. Young John Wallace In this same record are to be seen the signatures of every Member of the Company to the present day, a record which is thus a singularly interesting one, as also valuable in questions of ancestry. The late Mr James Jollie, W.S., Senior Clerk, prepared and presented to the Company, in 1839, in t ^ e 55th year .of his Clerkship, an alphabetical list of the whole List of Members Members of the Company. This list, brought down to the pre- sent day, is printed in the Appendix. Amongst these and the later names added to the list, will be found almost all the leading men of Edinburgh and Leith for nearly two centuries j not a few of whom were connected with the no- bility Merchant Company of Edinburgh. bility and highest families in the land. The consequence is, that now, as formerly, Membership in the Merchant Company is, as a rule, a very good test of high respefta- bility ; and while many of the principal office-bearers of the Company, such as the Masters and Treasurers, have after- wards become Lord Provosts of the city, and some of them the representatives of the city in Parliament, the office-bearers, generally, have, with very few exceptions, been sele&ed from amongst the foremost business men in Edinburgh. The earlier meetings of the Company were very numerously attended ; but as the absentees were fined, and their goods poinded for the penalties, their strift attention was to be ex- pefted. The Minutes commence generally with the words, 1682. " Almighty and Eternal God : Thy servants now assembled im- plore Early Meetings Prayer i6 Dean Annand Historical Notes as to the plore, according to Thy precious promises, the pardon of all our offences, and Thy Holy Spirit to deliver us from falling into the snares of sin and Satan : Keep us O Lord in peace, purity, brotherly love and concord, by removing pride, prejudice, passion, covetousness, and whatever may offend Thy Blessed Majesty. Bless our King and all the Royal Family, the Magistrates, and all the Incorporations of this City ; the Master and all the Members of this Society, that we may have fellowship with Thee. The sea is Thine, and Thy hands formed the dry land : prosper us in our present undertaking with the bounties of both; above all, with the bounties of Thy Spirit, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen" The Dean referred to was a noted man of his time, and was " the clergyman officially appointed to attend the unfor- tunate Earl of Argyle on the scaffold." " Y e clerk" did not continue long the duty of repeating the Prayer, as the first rule of the Company, made soon afterwards, threw the privilege, in a great majority of cases, on the Master ; and, after some years, the opening of the meetings with prayer fell into disuse. The earliest Rules of the Company are engrossed in the Minutes of the General Meeting of the Company on aznd No- vember 1682. A Committee had been previously appointed to wait upon the Magistrates for a " ratification of certain Rules of the Company or ( Society,' and for a general concurrence to any of their officers in the execution of the afts of the Com- pany against Unfreemen, whether they are altogether strangers or whether they have right to their freedom by their parents' marriages, or apprenticeships, not being actually entered Bur- gesses and Gild Brother of this burgh." These Rules were so ratified Merchant Company of Edinburgh. ratified under the amendment to be afterwards mentioned. We give in extenso these now curious Rules, as shewing the general features of the Company at that early date : RULES OF THE COMPANY. Prayer ConduEt of Members. " Firstly, That at every General Meeting of the Company, and at every Meeting of the Master and Assistants, the Master or Clerk shall say prayers 5 and that the Company, or Master and Assistants, if they think fit, may call one of the Ministers of Edinburgh to that purpose. " Secondly, That no openly profane person, a common and ordinar swearer, drunkard, or whoorer, be admitted to bear any office in the said Society ; and that the assertion of any three or four, or more, of the Company at the election, shall be a sufficient ground to debar any such nominat from being chosen, without any further probation. " Thirdly, That for every rash swearing or cursing, obscene or baudy expression, spoken by any Member in the publick or private meeting of the Society, shall pay Six Shillings Scots, to the poor, for the first fault, and Twelve Shillings thereafter. Membership. " Fourthly, That none hereafter shall be admitted into the Incorpor- ation but such as are Burgesses and Gild Brethren in Edinburgh, at the least, Burgesses. Master and Assistants, and mode of Ele&ion. " Fifthly, That the Master and Assistants be chosen of new every year. But to the effecl, there may be some of the Assistants always upon the Council, that they may be acquaint in the affairs of the So- ciety, the Company may choose for the succeeding year some of the Assistants of the year preceding, not exceeding the number of three, but are not to continue longer tyme than these two years together. " Sixthly, That, upon the last Monday of August, a leet be made of the First Rules i8 Historical Notes as to the First Rules the whole Company for Master and new Assistants, and the leet to consist of three for Master, out of the Assistants, thirty-six for Assistants, and three for Treasurer, of such persons of the whole Company as the Company shall think most fit, and copies to be given thereof by the Clerk to such as shall require it. " Seventhly, That, upon the first Monday of September being the day of election, after saying of prayers, the present Master cause read the whole leet, that the Company know there has been no altera- tion made of the leet, or if any happen to be, it may be objected against by any of the Company, and upon instant probation altered. " EiftttfyfThttt after prayers on the day of election, the first thing to be done by the Clerk is to read over the roll of such as are entered in the Company, and pay their quarterly dues, and mark those present who only are to vote in the election, and all others to be removed. " Ninthly, That those in the leet for Master, and Assistants, and Treasurer, remove after they have given their votes. " Tenthly, The elecYion being thus regularly and orderly finished, the former Master is to cause the Clerk read over the new elected persons, Members, and to take the oath defidell of such as are present. And in case of the absence of the new elected Master, there being seven of the new elected Assistants present, they nominate a Preses to preside and appoint the next meeting ; but if seven, which is a quorum, be not present, the former Master is to do it. " Eleventhly, That if any elected to be Master shall refuse to accept of his office, he shall be obliged to pay to the box Fifty Pounds Scots ; or if the Treasurer or any of the Assistants refuse, each one of them Fifty Merks ; besides, that the persons so elected and refusing, shall not be capable to be elected for any office in the Society for three years thereafter. Here Merchant Company of Edinburgh. " Here follow the Rules to be observed by the Master, Assist- ants, Treasurer, Clerk, and Officer : Meetings. " First, That, upon the first Meeting after the election, the Rules and Orders of the Society be read over by them j and such of them as have not taken the oath de fideli, then take it. " Secondly, That, in the Master's absence, the quorum of the Assis- tants may chuse one of their number to preside. " Thirdly, That, at every Meeting, they appoint the time of the next, with power to the Master and three Assistants, or eight Assistants, without the Master, to call a Meeting before the ordinary diet, in case of any emergent occasion. " Fourthly, That upon every absence from a Meeting appointed twelve hours before, of any of the Members, if in health, or in town, the Master or Clerk shall pay Six Shillings Scots, each time. Each Assistant or Treasurer, Four Shillings Scots, and the Officer, what the Meeting shall judge fit. And for every quarter of an hour after the hour of meeting appointed, Twelve Pennies Scots. Every Member of the Society shall pay for their absence from the General Meeting, Four Shillings Scots, and for sero, Twelve Pennies Scots ; for which fines, the Officer shall poind in case of not payment. Obtaining Netv Members, &c. " Fifthly, That the Masters and Assistants divide themselves in their bounds, to procure an exact list of all their trade in the Merchant's employment, that such as are Unfreemen may be proceeded against with all diligence and without delay, connivance, or tolerance, and that such as are Freemen unentered, may be compelled to enter and pay their quarterly dues, conform to the Patent. " Sixthly, That any information given by any of the Society, and offered to be proven against any Unfreeman trading in the city or sub- urbs, or Burgesses buying from Unfreemen, be presently followed furth and First Rules regulating Office-bearers 2O Historical Notes as to the First Rules and pursued j or any other legal and just complaints given in by any of the Company. Quarter Dues. " Sev enthly, That every quarter day a list be given into the Treasurer of the Members of the Society, that he may exact the quarterly pay- ments, and if they fail, he may cause the Officer poind therefor j and if that any that are entered Members of the Society do not actually trade and refuse to pay their quarterly payments, two terms being run and the third unpaid, he is not to have vote in the General Meeting. 11 Eighthly, That at the next General Meeting every Member pay in his quarterly dues for the time past, and thereafter at two General Meet- ings of the year, which is to be appointed for that effect, and that such as do not pay at these Meetings be poinded for the double by the Officer. Motions. " Ninthly^ That any overtures for the good of the Society, or rules, or orders thought fit to be observed by them, proceeding either from Master or Assistants, or any person of the Society, shall be first ma- turely considered by the Master and Assistants, and unanimously agreed to by them, or major part of them, and which is not to pass at the first General Meeting, but be delayed until a second General Meeting, and then to be determined by plurality of votes. Business above 5. " Tenthly, Before any business of consequence that may cost the Society above Five Pounds sterling, shall be undertaken, a General Meeting is to be called and their consent by plurality of votes obtained for prosecution thereof $ and if the Master and Assistants shall do in the contrary, it shall be upon their own charge ; and if by the General Meeting, it shall be judged to be to their damage, what they have done shall be cancelled and annulled, and the charges not allowed ; and the Treasurer shall not be obliged to answer or pay any sum above Five Pounds Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Pounds sterling by any order from the Master and Assistants, except by an aft passed in the General Meeting. Treasurers Accounts. " Eleventhly, The Treasurer's accounts are to be examined the first Monday of October, by a Committee to be appointed by the General Meeting, consisting of twelve, whereof eight are to be chosen out of the Company, who are in no office, two of the old and two of the new Assistants, whereof any seven is to be a quorum, and the Treasurer's books are to lie in the Clerk's hands, to be seen and perused by any of the Company who shall desire the same, ten days before the accounts be brought in to be approven by a General Meeting. RATIFICATION AND AMENDMENT " The which Rules and Orders particularly above-mentioned, the Council ratifies and approves, and enterpones their authority thereto, and ordains the same to stand in full force and vigour in all time coming, with this express provision, declaration, and amendment, that as to the point of the foresaid general concurrence granted by the Coun- cil to the said Incorporation and Society of Merchants, the same shall be restricted allenarly as to the seizure and apprehending of Unfreemen who are not actually entered Burgess and Gild Brethren of Edinburgh 5 and that the said general concurrence shall not extend any further. As, likewise, with this provision and amendment, that in case the said Incorporation shall admit and receive, or suffer any persons to sit and vote amongst them who is not previously entered Bur- gess and ' Gild' Brother of this burgh, in case they trade in foreign commodities, or if they trade only in inland commodities, that they be simple * Burgess,' or if that they be Burgess' daughters, that they have licence from the Council of Edinburgh, or relicts of Freemen Burgesses, that then the said Incorporation have, by the acceptation hereof, ex- pressly bound and obliged, that if they shall receive or enter any person as said is Members of their Incorporation, without first they be actually entered First Rules 22 "Lady Members Resolve to purchase a Hall Reasons for doing so Historical Notes as to the entered Burgess and Freemen of this burgh, and can produce their Burgess tickets, then to pay to the Dean of Gild of Edinburgh, for the time, the sum of One Hundred Pounds Scots, for every such failure for the use of the town." As regards the Lady Merchants referred to in the above lati- fication, not a few of them entered the Company j and, accord- ingly, in the Record we find such entries as the following : Ahtone^ by virtue of a license from the Dean of Gild, dated 13 Jan. 1683, ye 21 of Oct. 1684 entered." " Eli%abeth Bennet, shopkeeper, in the Change, ed null Burgess : Entered ye 6 Jan. 1685, and paid her dues." " Sarah Cockburn, spouse of Robert Kyle." The wives of Members sometimes paid the entry money j and at a General Meeting on ajth August 1694, it is reported that a certain Burgess and Guild Brother had subscribed the " book, his wife having paid the entry-money. 11 Hitherto the Company had met in the " High Council House j" but the Members having (Minute i6th March 1691) become " convinced that great prejudice had arisen to the So- ciety by the want of a public hall or house for carrying all Unfreemen's goods to, there to lie and remain until sold to Freemen of the said city j for the want whereof, Unfreemen's goods are kept in private houses, and sold clandestinely every day;" therefore, the Master and Assistants " pitched upon the Great Lodging, Yard, and waste ground, lying in the Cow- gate, which belonged to Andrew Crawford, Sheriff-Clerk of Linlithgow." Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Linlithgow." The rental of this property was then seven hun- dred pounds Scots, and the price paid for it was 12,100 merks. This " Great Lodging" had a very aristocratic history ; and as it was one of the most celebrated buildings in the Old Town, and, apart from this, must be of special interest to the Mem- bers, as the Merchant Hall in the olden time, we shall particu- larly refer to it. It stood on the ground on which the southern piers of George IV. Bridge now rest. The ground was, we find from the old title-deeds, first granted by James, King of Scotland, to John, Lord Bothwell, in 1485. It passed rapidly through other hands, and in 1498, the King, who had re-acquired it by the summary mode of revoking all prior donations, granted it to John Ramsay, Knight. In 1543, it passed to Sir John Ramsay's son, William Ramsay of Balmain. David Ramsay of Balmain afterwards (1553) acquired it as heir of his father, and, in 1562, granted a charter to David M'Gill, advocate. In 1582, David and his spouse, Isabel Cunningham, were infeft in it. On 5th May 1586, David, now the King's Advocate, obtained a license from King James, un- der his Privy Seal, for raising the lodging and bringing the same out upon the street free of purprision. In 1586, David gave the property to his son John, reserving, however, right to re- claim it on payment of a crown of gold. He exercised this right against his young son in 1592, after going through vari- ous necessary ceremonies, amongst others, granting a Procura- tory Price This Property of historical celebrity Former Pro- prietors of it Historical Notes as to the tory of Resignation to his other son Alexander, to pass to St Giles's Kirk and redeem the said lodging from John, by pay- ment or consignation of a crown of gold, and by obtaining a Decreet of Redemption from the Lords of Session, on iath August 1592. In 1603, David M'Gill of Cranston-Riddell, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, was infeft in it and in the patronage of St Eloy situate within the parish kirk of St Giles, as heir of his father, the said David M'Gill, his Majesty's Advocate. On i7th July 1619, James M'Gill of Cranston-Riddell, afterwards Viscount of Oxford, father to Robert Viscount of Oxford, acquired it as heir to his brother David. This Robert Viscount of Oxford, got it from his father in 1656, and, in 1683, conveyed it, along with the right of patronage of the chaplainaiy of the altar of " St Elegens the Confessor," to Andrew Crawford, Sheriff-Clerk of Linlith- gow, for the sum of 14,000 merks. In 1691, the Merchant Company acquired the property, with the exception of the pa- tronage of St Eloy. The Disposition by Mr Crawford was granted in favour of Robert Blackwood, then Master, George Warrender, then Treasurer, and George Jollie, James Ritchie, and the other then Assistants, and their successors in office, for the use and behoof of the Company. The property is de- scribed as " All and haill the said Great Lodging or Tenement of land sometime pertaining to David Ramsay of Balmain, and annalized by him to the deceased Mr David M'Gill of Cranston, lying in the burgh of Edinburgh, upon the south side of the high street of the Cowgate thereof ; Merchant Company of Edinburgh. thereof} bigged and waste, back and fore, under and above, with the yard, well, close, and pertinents thereof, lying betwixt the land some- time pertaining to William Hog and Jean Waldersone, thereafter to the deceased Hugh M'Gill, prebender of Corstorphine, on the east ; and the lands pertaining to William Anderson, thereafter to Robert Wilson, and thereafter to the deceased William Speed, bailie, and an certain trance regal leading to the Grayfriar Port, on the west j the arable land or Croft of the Sisters of the Nuns of the Sheyns, on the south ; and the high street of the Cowgate, on the north parts : And which tene- ment and yard is now bounded betwixt the land of John Alexander, watchmaker, and the Hammerman's land, with the King's high way leading to the Society Port, on the west ; and certain houses and build- ings, whereof the most part belong to the Society for brewing, of the good town of Edinburgh, on the south ; the lands of Patrick Chalmers, wright, and the lands of the heirs of the deceased Mr Robert Hamilton, writer to the signet, with the yard belonging to James Smith, candle- maker, on the east ; and the high street of the Cowgate of Edinburgh, on the north parts. The greater portion of this interesting tenement and ad- joining buildings, then called Merchant Court, was sold by the Company by Disposition, dated loth and i3th February 1829, to the Commissioners appointed under the City Improvement A61, along with the close or area, with the Toofall, Stable, and other houses acquired by the Com- pany in 1737, from a Mungo Graham. The price paid by the Commissioners was 2541, io/. This Disposition con- tains an obligation to make the titles, as far as related to the subjects, not thereby conveyed, viz., Merchant Street (for- merly a bowling green), forthcoming to the Company. The property Cowgate Property Sold in I3Z9 Cowgate Property Earl of Haddington Tarn o 1 the Cowgate Historical Notes as to the property was shortly afterwards pulled down by the Commis- sioners, to make way for George IV. Biidge. Before taking farewell of the old Merchant Hall, as to which time is so rapidly wearing out all traces, vse think it right to refer to some of the historical associations, in addition to those above mentioned, which cluster around it, because, as has been remarked by Wilson in his Memorials of Edinburgh, " If we except the old Mint and the venerable chapel of St Magdalene, no other site could have been chosen for the new [George IV.] Bridge where their [the Commissioners] proceedings would have been so destructive. On the ground now occupied by its southern piers, formerly stood Merchant Court, a large area, inclosed on three sides by antique buildings, in a plain but massive style of architecture, and containing, in- ternally, finely stuccoed ceilings, and handsome paneling, with other indications of former magnificence, suitable to the mansion of the celebrated Thomas Hamilton, first Earl of Haddington, President of the Court of Session, and Secretary of State for Scotland, the favourite of James VI., and one of the most eminent men of his day. The King facetiously styled this favourite, Tarn o" the Cowgate. ."* " His Majesty had the custom of bestowing ridiculous sobriquets on his principal counsellors and courtiers. Thus, he conferred upon that grave and sagacious statesman, John Earl of Mar, the nick- name P. 107 Memorials of Edinburgh in the Olden Time, by David Wilson, F.R.S.S.A., vol. ii. Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 27 name, Jock o" Sklates, probably in allusion to some circum- stance which occurred in their young days, when they were the fellow-pupils of Buchanan. On hearing of a meditated alliance between the Haddington and Mar families, his Majesty exclaimed, betwixt jest and earnest, 'The Lord haud a grup o 1 me ! If Tarn o' the Cowgate's son marry Jock o' Sklate's daughter, what's to come o 1 me ? ' The good-natured monarch probably apprehended that so close a union betwixt two of his most subtle statesmen, might make them too much for their master as hounds are most dangerous when they hunt in couples."* It is difficult, at this distant date, to obtain as satisfa&ory a description of the structure and site of the building during its palmy days as we could desire. According to Mr Chambers's account of this " court of old buildings," " the principal room on the second floor, towards the Cowgate, was a very superb one, having a stucco ceiling, divided into square com- partments, each of which contained some elegant device." (Traditions, p. 238). Arnot, in his History of Edinburgh, does not say anything about it. Nor does Maitland. Robertson is also silent. Wilson's remarks we have quoted. But all ac- counts are meagre. We find, amongst some old papers, two, dated in 1691, which throw some light on the size and struc- ture of the house. The first is a curious Inventory of Locks and Keys, as follows : " INVENTAR Jock o' Sklates Interior of Cowgate Property * Traditions of Edinburgh, by Robert Chambers, p. 237. Historical Notes as to the Rooms "INVENTAR OF LOCKS AND KEYS IN LODGING, 1691 " Lonvermost Lodging, possessed by James Dun/op, 25 Sept. 1691. " Hall door, a fine lock and key and a sneck. A Pantry door, a new lock and key, and a sneck on a door within. On ye Lesser Pantry, a new lock. Wester Chamber, a lock without a key, but a sneck. J Closet, not a sneck and key. Inner Chamber, a lock and key. In door of our Gallerie, a lock without a key. 2 doors within Little Chamber with 2 blunt (?) snecks. A lock on their Kitchen Door. " In the Lady Castle mi Ik's Lodging. " In the Easter Chamber to the Hall, lock and key. In the Hall or Mid-room, one sneck. In the Wester Room, one lock and key. In the Closet at the end of the transe, one lock and key. In the New Room to the Gallerie, I lock and key. In the Room at the end of the Gallerie, I lock and key. In the big door to the Wester Room, I sneck. In the Hanging Door in the Stair, I lock and key. In the Kitchen door, i lock and key. In the Outer Room door to the lodging, I sneck. In the Little Closet as they enter to ye Gallerie, i lock and key." The other old paper, of the same date, contains the fol- lowing statement of the rents of the Cowgate property : " Rental Merchant Company of Edinburgh. ** Rental of the Lodging at the foot of Ltbertone^s Wynd, as possestjrom Whitsunday 1691. Patrick Chamers, wright, his Shop . 3368 Janet Craig . . . . 26 13 4 John Couper . . 38 o o Interest of 40 for reparations a 8 o 40 William Robertson, a Cellar within the close 10 o o William Hopkirk, Kitchen, Chambers, and Cellar . . . . 66 13 4 James Dunlop, Under House and 2 Cellars 200 o o Lady Castlemilk, whole Over- Lodging, 2 Cellars, and Wardrop, frae Lambas to Whitsunday . . . 200 o o Mr Dunlop has promised 50 merks to the Company . . . . 33 6 8 610 8 o" This Rental, it is curious to notice, is written on the fly- leaf of an old letter, addressed on the outside "For Mr George Warrender, Merchant in Edinburgh. To be left at Thomas Laurie's Shop in the I.uckenbooths of Edinburgh." This Mr Warrender was a Treasurer of the Company, and an ancestor of the present Baronet of that name. We give, in the Appendix, an extract from Burke" s Peerage and Baronetage as to this family. Many Rental Mr Warren- dcr Historical Notes as to the Excise Office Old Hall Many years after the Company acquired the property, they let a portion of it to the Commissioners of Excise. The Commissioners, however, relinquished the right to the property at Martinmas 1773. During their possession, and subsequently, the tenement was called " The Excise Officer Any reader wishing to visit this old spot, may take his way from George IV. Bridge, down Candlemaker Row, and, pass- ing Merchant Street (formerly the Company's bowling-green), he will reach the Cowgate. Turning to the right, he will soon come to the Magdalene Chapel, " a curious relic of the sixteenth century, belonging to the Corporation of Hammer- men, and to which the body of the Earl of Argyll, after his execution, June 30, 1685, was brought down and de- posited, to await its removal to the family burying-place at Kilmun." (Traditions, p. 238, note.} Passing it and the Hammermen's Close, to the east of the Chapel, he comes to some poor looking shops, close upon the spot where stood the old mansion of the Earl of Haddington, afterwards the Merchant Hall. Here, within the shadow of departed great- ness, is nothing save squalor and poverty ; and any one of a poetic mind may take his stand there and ask, without a chance of a satisfa&ory answer, where are all the nobles who used to flit about this spot? where the noble Earl, the favourite of the King ? where Lady Crammond, Lady Castlemilk, Lord Buchan, Lady Binns, and the other nobility, tenants in the Mer- chant Merchant Company of Edinburgh. chant Company buildings, who oncedwelt here in affluence ? and where the noble old court of buildings, with its " su- perb" second floor? And he will find that all are gone, and, vision like, left not a wreck behind ! We entered a wretched hovel close at hand, and asked where the Mer- chant Court or Excise Office formerly stood, and received for answer, " I never heard o' it : it canna be in this street"! And so, we suppose, when Macaulay's New Zealander comes to Princes Street to complete his Sketch Book with a view of the ruins of the Register House, he may, in answer to his inquiry as to where it once stood, be told, " I never heard o' it: it canna be in this street." Within a stone throw of the southern piers of George IV. Bridge, or area of the old Merchant Hall, resided formerly the Earl of Mar, Lord Minto, Lord Kennet, Lord Coving- ton, Lady Galloway, the latter described as " A Lady well known by her airs, Who ne'er goes to revel but after her prayers !" and many others of the nobility. Near by lived Mrs Syme, whose daughter, shortly after marrying Mr Henry Broug- ham, removed to 19 St Andrew Square, and gave birth, in 1779, to Henry Brougham, afterwards Lord Chancellor of England. The birth-place of Mackenzie, " The Man of Feeling," was also close at hand. Over the way stood the mansion of Sir Thomas Hope, in which the National Covenant Aristocratic Tenants Cowgate Residenters Lord Brougham Historical Notes as to the Covenant is supposed to have been prepared, and in which, also, the Countess of Mar, daughter of the Duke of Lennox, died in 1644.. Up in Brown Square, at a comparatively jeanie Elliot recent period, lived Miss Jeanie Elliot, the authoress of the charming version of " The Flowers of the Forest, 11 beginning, " I've heard the lilting at our yowe-milking, Lassies a-lilting, before the dawn of day j But now they are moaning, on ilka green loaning, The Flowers of the Forest are a' wede away." But we need scarcely single out names, as every old building around has its history, its noted tenants, men who were in their day the lights of the city and of the country. M'Gill David M'Gill of Cranston-Riddell, King's Advocate to James VI., we have already shewn was proprietor of the old Hall premises, and, according to Wilson's Memorials (vol. ii. p. 107), he is said to have died of grief on this Sir Thomas Hamilton (afterwards Earl of Melrose and Haddington), being appointed his colleague. The Cowgate The Cowgate of early days was thus very different from the Cowgate of to-day, so far as everything except its name and locality are concerned ; and the Merchant Company chose for their place of business one of the most aristocratic quarters of the town, as the Cowgate and the Canongate were then the chief places of residence for the nobility. Indeed, so early Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 33 as about 1530, the Cowgate is thus described by Alexander Alesse : " Ubi nihil est humile aut rusticum, sed omnia mag- nifica" ! [Where nothing is humble or homely, but every- thing magnificent ! ] * It is, therefore, not at all surprising to find in the Records, that the Merchant Company were in the habit of letting a portion of their premises, after the purchase, to various members of the aristocracy. In 1694, a Minute states that Lady Alva had taken part of it for a year, at a rent of 20 sterling, and paid js. as earnest money. We have already re- ferred to others of the nobility who were tenants. The Hall of the Company was not in a very complete state of repair when the Company acquired it, as, in August 1691, " it was represented that the ceiling of the Hall was like to fall down, and that it had need to be plaistered," where- upon " the whole Company In one voice appoints it to be plais- tered" Connected with our old Hall property in the Cowgate was a pitce of ground, afterwards converted into a bowling-green. Bowls in those days were not so plentiful as now. Ten pair, at a cost of 6, 4^. 3^., were obtained from abroad ! Almost as much difficulty seems to have been experienced in obtaining Rules as Bowls } and at a General Meeting of the Company on 3oth August 1697, " it being moved by some Members of the Company, Cowgate Bowling- Green Bowls Traditions of Edinburgh, p. 230. 34 Historical Notes as to the Laws of Green Allan Ramsay Merchant Street An- nuities Company, that the Company's bowling green loses many cus- tomers by the tacksman wanting law s to regulate gamesters and bystanders, which all other bowling greens have ; and that there is a person who has the said laws written in a fair hand, and is willing to sell the same for a dollar : the Company or- dains the Treasurer to pay a dollar for the said laws, and de- liver them to John Hislop, present tacksman, upon his receipt to redeliver the same in good condition at the finish of his tack ; or otherwise, to pay the foresaid price for the same." This Green was at one time called Thomson's Green, it being sometime tenanted by a man of that name ; and it is to it that Allan Ramsay alludes in one of his poems : " Driving their ba's frae whins to tee, There's no ae gouffer to be seen, Nor doucer folk wysing a-jee The byas bowls on Tamson's Green." This Green is shewn very distinctly on the old and inter- esting plan annexed to Maitland's History of Edinburgh. The Company's connexion with the Cowgate has not yet wholly ceased, as they still receive 18, i4-f. of ground rents or annuities from a portion of their old property on which Mer- chant Street is built. Annuities which formerly amounted to about 73, were reserved by the Company when disposing of their properties in the Cowgate. This sum of 73 continued till 1852 to be paid to the Company. At that time it stood divided thus : i. Various Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 35 i . Various small properties . . 5 5 2. Mr George Callender, for " area in the old Excise Office Garden " sold to him (1778) 99 3. Improvement Commissioners represented by the Bank of Scotland, the Commer- cial Bank, the Union Bank, and William Bonar, on behalf of the late firm of Ramsay, Bonar, & Company, Bankers .... 58 6 o 73 o o On 4th August 1852, 54, 6s. of the above sum were pur- chased by the Banks from the Company at a price of 1357, ioj., being 25 years purchase. The Company purchased their ground on the west side of Present Hall of Company Hunter Square in September 1788, for 1500, and erected the present Merchant Hall premises upon it.* The estimated value of this property is 4080, and it yields rents to the amount of 225, i2j. On the second floor is the Hall of the Company, and in which they hold their General Meetings. It is a com- modious, and might, at no great outlay, be made a hand- some room. The only ornament in the Hall is the Level which the present Master (Mr Lawson) used at the ceremony of laying the foundation-stone at the New Post-Office. It is handsomely framed in oak, and rests on blue velvet. It has a melancholy * As will be afterwards seen, the Company had also a place of meeting in the Exchange. Historical Notes as to the Present Hall Level used at New Post- Oflice melancholy interest as being so recently used at one of the last public ceremonials, in which the lamented Prince-Consort took part. The following inscription is upon it : LEVEL Used by the MASTER of the COMPANY of MERCHANTS, Edinburgh, At the laying of the Foundation-Stone of the New Post-Office, Edinburgh, By H. R. H. the PRINCE-CONSORT, O&ober 23rd 1861. At the north-west end, is a side-room in which the Master and Assistants, and the Governors and Committees of the Com- pany's Hospitals meet. And there is another side-room at the south-west corner. However interesting the present Hall is, as the scene of many a stirring discussion on public questions, it is matter of surprise that such a wealthy and influential Com- pany has not a more imposing place of meeting But leaving the Halls, past and present, we take up the thread of our narrative as regards the Company's actings in reference to trade and other matters. As was to be expected, the office-bearers had often, during the gradual rise of the Company, besides attending to the protection of their trade, to manage matters of lesser mo- ment A great proportion of the trouble relating to both the important and unimportant affairs of the Company fell on the Treasurer. He Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 37 He sometimes found that his duties were not very pleasant, but he seems to have gone through them with much spirit. At the General Meeting, on 6th December 1708, " The Treasurer reports, that John Beg (the officer), having gone to Leith with William Davidson, Town officer, to poind Mr Comlie, con- form to order the I5th November last, and having offered to draw a poind, were masterfully deforced and abused by the said Henry Comlie j and the Treasurer, with John Arburne and Adam Lin, and two officers, having gone to Leith upon another day, viz., zpth November last, in order to draw a poind, or to persuade him to consign a pledge, and re- fer himself to the Company, he called them 'rogues, villains, and rob- bers,' and uttered several other opprobrious expressions, not only against the above-named persons in particular, but also against the whole Com- pany, and, lifting up a great cannon-ball, declared, * that whoever offered to take any poind from him should be a dead man.' Where- upon the said Henry Comlie being called in and acknowledging as to the complaint, the Master ordained him instantly to find caution to com- pear before the Justice of Peace Court to answer for the said complaint, this day, at 3 afternoon, otherwise appointed two officers to carry him to the guard until he find caution to compear, an said is, upon which he found John Corstorphine, merchant, cautioner to the effedt foresaid ; and the town-officer having instantly cited him to compear, the Trea- surer is appointed immediately to wait upon Mr Samuel Gray, pro- curator-fiscal, to draw the complaint and disburse what may be necessary, and report to next meeting." It may be mentioned, that he was fined five pounds sterling, and committed to prison until he paid the same. Illustrative of the minor matters which the Treasurer had sometimes to attend to, we give the following from the Minutes of zznd November 1697. The Master and Assistants, in conse- quence The Treasurer The Treasurer and the Can- non Ball Historical Notes as to the The Treasurer The Clerk Dean of Edinburgh quence of a communication from " Humbie, complaining that his hearthstone is broken," remit to the " Treasurer to visit the said hearth and try if the said reparation be necessary, as, also, to try what way the hearthstone was broken." The Trea- surer visited the hearthstone, but, " in his opinion, the repara- tion of the hearthstone is not presently necessary." As the business of the Company was increasing, they resolved, in September 1684, to fix some allowance to the Clerk 5 and in the following month (although the Clerk does not appear to have become clamorous), the Master and Assistants appointed the Treasurer, in the meantime, for the Clerk's encouragement, to insure him in as much " money as will mount him in a sufficient suit, with hat and stocking, till they consider further what he shall have conform to the remit from the General Meeting." The Company had a partiality for thus rewarding services, as, shortly afterwards, they ordained Hugh Blair, one of their number, to furnish the Dean of Edinburgh with " six ells of fine black cloth for a gown, and for which the said Hugh Blair is to have from the Company twenty shillings sterling the ell, if it be paid within twelve months, but if it happen to be any longer resting, the price is to be augmented at the discretion of the Company conform to the time." The Minutes of the Company about this time are expressed with much brevity, and readers are not, therefore, surprised to find Robert Russell appointed interim clerk " in respect, Daniel M'Pherson, Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 39 M'Pherson, Clerk to the Merchant Company, is departed this life." And again, at a later period, viz., in the Minutes of September 1704, Walter Cheislie is stated to be elected Preses of that sederunt, " in absence of the Master, who is over the water to the interment of his father-in-law ! " From the very outset of the Company, it received many sub- stantial tokens of goodwill in the shape of donations to the funds, not only from Members, but from strangers onne6t.ed with them by trade in Manchester, London, and elsewhere ; and these strangers were frequently made Members of the Company. The Donors each received a Diploma, as to which great care was shewn. Thus we read as follows in regard to one of these (Minute, nth October 1697) : " The Clerk informs that he has made ready a Diploma for Michael Kincaid, who has already *one for London ; and seeing the persons that was employed likeways in writing this Diploma, the said Clerk demands to know if this Diploma be fine enough for sending to Lon- don, for, in his own opinion, neither the parchment nor write is so good as were requisite to send abroad. Which being considered by the Master and Assistants, they order the Clerk to cause make a new Diploma for the said Michael Kincaid upon finer parchment, and writ by a finer hand ; and the same being put in best dress that may be, the Clerk is ordered to deliver the same to the Treasurer, who is appointed to take care to transmit it to his hand with all convenient diligence." The Company shewed a good deal of shrewdness as to these donations, as a Diploma put in " best dress" was fre- quently presented blank in the sum, and the amount was filled Brevity of Minutes Donations Diploma 4 o Historical Notes as to the Donations filled in at the donor's dictation. It may readily be sup- posed that the fine appearance of the Diploma would occasion- ally tempt the gift of a larger sum than was at first intended. The following is a copy of a sealed Diploma to a resident Member, acknowledging a donation : " Edinburgh, the twentieth day of Julie, one thousand six hundereth and nyntie-one years. " John Duncan, Merchant, Burges and Guild Brother of the City of Edinburgh, was matriculat and admitted in the Societie and Company of Merchants, to enjoy the liberties and privileges thereof. As, also, in the year one thousand six hundereth and nynty-two years, the said John Duncan payed into Walter Cheislie, their Treasurer, the sum of one hundereth merks, Scots, as the voluntar donation to the said Com- pany. Extracted forth of the Records of the said Company, and their common seall appended by R. RUSSELL, C/s. Societal;*." At a date considerably later than that of which we now write, it was still common to give such donations. Thus, from 1768 to 1819, we find the following amongst many others: 1768 Sir Laurence Dundas, Bart. 1769 Mr Beech . 1781 James Hunter Blair, Esq. 1789 William Ramsay, Esq. of Barntt,n 1794 Walter Hogg, Esq. 1798 James Gillespie, Esq. of Spylaw . 1819 Andrew Mein, Esq. . * 300 o 140 II 100 O 105 100 500 o d. o 9 o o o o o o In the year 1693, the Company acquired a legacy of 3500 Scots, Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Scots, left by " the deceased David Aitkenhead, Merchant in Poland ; " and it was paid over by Sir Patrick Aitkenhead, " Comisar " Clerk of Edinburgh, nephew of the donor, to the Company, for the maintenance of a poor decayed Member of the Company, " if there be any such of the said Company, and if not," then to others as then mentioned. It says much for the position of the Company and the individual Members, that when the interest on this sum first became payable, there was " no one of the said Company or Society of Merchants for the time that stands in need of the benefit of this present mortification."" According to custom, a notice of this donation was ordered to be put on the wall of the Hall, and in these terms : " DAVID AITKENHEAD, Merchant in Poland, son of the deceased Mr Thomas Aitkenhead, Advocate, and one of the Comisars of Edin- burgh, out of a special respect for that Citie, wherein many of his pre- decessors had been chief Magistrates, Did mortifie 3500 pounds Scots to be bestowed for any pious use within the same : which sum was paid to the Merchant Company on the 2nd of August 1693, By Sir Patrick Aitkenhead, Comisar Clerk of Edinburgh, nephew to the said deceased David, for maintaining decayed Merchants, conform to a con- tract thereanent passed betwixt the said Sir Patrick and the Merchant Company, which Contract is registrat in the Comisar of Edinburgh, their Court books, upon the gth of March 1696." The Aitkenhead Mortification is valued at 250 ; and a sum of 14, ios.y as the interest of the same, is still paid to a decayed member. In Aitkenhead's Mortification Historical Notes as to the Armcvial Bearings In July 1693 the Company, in terms of their Aft, obtained a Coat of Arms. The following is an extraft of the Masonry of this Coat Armorial : " To all and sundry whom these presents do or may concerne, I, Sir Alexander Erskine of Cambo, Knight and Baronet, Lyon King of Armes, Considering that by the twenty-one Adi of the third session of the second Parliament of King Charles the Second, of ever blessed memory, I am empowered to visit the whole armes of Noblemen, Pre- lates, Barons, and Gentlemen within this kingdom, and to distinguish them with congruent differences, and to matriculate the same in my Books and Registers, and to give armes tv> vertuous and well-deserveing persons, and extracts of all armes, expressing the Blason thereof, under my hand and seall of office, Which Register is by the said Aft ordained to be respected as the true and unrepealable Rule of all Armes and bear- ings in Scotland, to remain with the Lyon office as the publick Register of the Kingdom : Therefore, conform to the tenor of the said Aft of Parliamenr, I testify and make known that the Armes allowed by me to the Company of Merchants in Edinburgh is matriculat in my said Publick Register, upon the day and date of these presents, and is thus blasoned, viz.: Argent, in the Sea a ship under saill proper flagged of Scotland, a cheif tierced per pale azur, vert, and argent In the first a St Andrew's Cross argent, charged with a Thistle vert, and over it a Crown or, In the second, two Ells in Saltyre or, and from a cloud above a hand issuant and holding a pair of Ballances proper In the thrid, a Castle tripled towred sable. Their crest set above the sheild is a Sphere, with this motto in an Escroll Terra marique supported by two Sea Unicorns. Which armes the said Company of Merchants in Edin- burgh may cause ingrave upon their sealls or cause be otherwayes repre- sented for the use of the said Company. In testimony whereof I have subscrived this extraft, and caused append my seall of office hereto, Att Edinburgh, the twentie-fourth day of July, and of the reigne of our Soveraigne Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Soveraigne Lord and Lady, King William and Queen Mary, the fyfth year, 1693. (Signed), " ALEXR. ERSKINE, Lyon." The Company, in virtue of the powers given them by their Charter, exerted their best efforts to prevent unlawful trading in the city. Occasionally, however, such was carried on stealthily, until, by some unlucky indiscretion on the part of the offender, it was discovered. Thus, in 1697, it is reported by the Treasurer " That an unfreewoman, named Mary Flackfield, being a Glasgow woman, har gone thro' Edinburgh for a considerable time, from house to house, with great quantities of muslin plaids and other merchants wares, and having come at last to the said Treasurer's house with four plaids, offering to sell the same, he seized tha said plaids, and produced them instantly at the Board j and the said Mary Flackfield being pre- sent did acknowledge her trading as said is, and submit herself to the Company's determination} which being considered by the Master and Assistants, they ordain the said Mary Flackfield to pay to the Stid Treasurer the sum of twenty pounds Scots ; and appoints the Treasurer to keep the plaids till the said sum is paid." Mary, however, did not quietly submit to this penalty ; on the contrary, in January 1698, she petitioned for pardon, in respecl that she had an aged mother to support j and the Company, with its usual liberality, granted it. The Company had sometimes difficulty in obtaining pay- ment of the dues and fines, and they had occasionally to take curious kinds of security for th'em. Thus, in the Minutes of igth November 1698, we read, that "William Lamb being presented, 43 Unlawful Trading 44 Historical Notes as to the Mrs Chal- mers's Web, Widowhood, and Marriage Lawyers presented, he desired that, seeing he has not ready money to pay what he is resting, the Company therefore may be pleased to accept of three butts of good sack, which he has in hand, and in Leith, in security of their money."" The sack was accepted, but was afterwards (i6th January 1699) ordered to be sold. Captain Chalmers and his wife were both troublesome people, about the year 1700. It is ordered, in September, in reference to a web detained in security of dues owing by the late Captain Chalmers, that " his relick be spoke to and re- quired to pay what her husband owes, and take back the said web." Looking through the subsequent Minutes with mournful feelings to ascertain the fate of this widow's web, the reader is startled by coming upon the following entry in O6lo- ber 1701 : " Mrs Chalmers sent an excuse that she married yesterday night, and so cannot coveniently attend this day to relieve the web, but that she will be ready against next meeting} in respecT: whereof, the rouping of her web is de- layed till she be of new warned." The Merchant Company, unlike some other corporations, do not appear to have expressly excluded lawyers from enter- ing the Company ; and, in point of fac~t, a number did enter. Thus, on 1 8th February 1697, "Charles Mitchell, Writer in Edinburgh, as also Burgess and Gild Brother, hereof, per ticket, dated the i4th of August 1695, subscribed the book and paid his dues to the Treasurer j and thereafter, having given his promise of fidelity, was admitted as a member." Several Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 45 Several of the Writers who entered, appear to have been also merchants. A very long memorial was prepared in 1703 by the Com- pany, as to importing and wearing prohibited goods. It con- tained the following curious account of the trials and troubles of Edinburgh Merchants : " Edinburgh is the chief centre and city of the kingdom for the main transactions of trade, and (by a common mistake) is presumed to be the place where reformation must begin ; and therefore at making prohibitory laws on trade, all rigour and severity is used there, while the whole nation beside goes free. And those Merchants alenarly are haras- sed, while the wearers and all others gae free and uncontrolled through another mistake that if the Merchants be narrowly looked after, the laws will be effectual ; and yet we have found by experience, that unless the wearing be restrained all other endeavours will be to no purpose, for the ready finding of buyers and wearers does alenarly tempt strangers and smuglers to import, yea it is known that some of the Society of Prosecutors are in the transgression for wearing prohibite goods in their families, and have been detected heretofore, but never punished. *' Amongst all the crowd of tiansgressors which have been attacqued or are known, the Merchants of Edinburgh are few, not above three or four, and the latest too, and have been forced to it through the ruin of their trade and livlyhood by the vast import and consumption of pro- hibite goods as is already observed, and the importers and sellers are either unfree, strangers, and smuglers, or the servants of noblemen and gentlemen, and some even gentlemen and ladies themselves, who are protected against the law by the means of persons of dignity and in power, and some favourable excuse made in their favors, or some other shift to bring them off. " In prosecution of the laws, the Merchants are at random harassed by pursuits, and many brought under bonds of ane unaccountable nature, and Trials and Troubles of Edinburgh Merchants Historical Notes as to the Trials and Troubles of Edinburgh Merchants and unprofitable, and were denied the common favour of ane oath of calumny, till by much pains and expenses they obtained ane Interlocu- tor thereon by the Honourable Lords of Sessione in their favours, and the Society of Prosecutors being thereafter straitned in many of their processes to give the oath of calumny, have hired a common fellow on weekly pensione, to depone in all processes ; a most unchristian and unheard of practise, and the delegates of this society have at their own hands, without consent of their constituents who payed the fund of money, appointed a third part of all free funds to be given to the ma- nagers of the process, although they undertook the work gratis for a common benefite, which demonstrates how they chiefly designed their own private profits, both in your pretended silk manufactories, and prosecuting the laws. " The Merchants lye exposed to rude and libertine searching and overturning of their shops and houses upon a general and summar war- rant, without any previous process or cognition taken of a just cause for so doing \ and though found free of prohibite goods, are yet abused by being at pleasure put upon oath to answer various and dubious prying questions never before allowed, without being examined on or allowed to give such a genuine, plain, and conscionable answer as might satisfy any but inquisitors, and have no favour allowed them but the oath of calumny of this common hired swearer. " At searches they are often brought under difficulties by having their sealed goods carried oft" and the sealls broke or defaced by rough handling, or are sometimes so unluckie as to have goods that were sealed, and the seal broke or defaced, and in none of these cases is there any favour to ym agt the rigour and letter of the law, tho' the antiquity and fashion of the goods plainly tells that they have not been unlawfully imported; nor are they allowed redress for spuilzie when their lawful goods are carried away without being measured. Yea, they have no certainty but that a pack of ruffians may attacque their shop (when there is only a servant within) on a pretended war- rant to search for prohibite goods. "The Merchant Company of Edinburgh. " The Merchants are also exposed to unreasonable and expensive pro- cesses for goods found in yr custody, whereof the very like are made in the kingdom, although they be bought at home, and that the pos- sessor was made accessary to unlawful importane, and on they are put to oath on various inquisitory and extraneous questions without being allowed the reasonable demand of a legall probatione to be led against them on the goods; and by this practice are exposed to all imaginable hardships and inconveniences, and the innocent doo often run the hazard of unlawful swearing, or be contemned by consequences. " And notwithstanding of this rigour against Merchants, these pro- secutors must acknowledge that the wearing and using of these pro- hibite goods is almost universall and without controle, albeit probatione can be easily adduced against the transgressors without any oaths, and there has been little or no attempts against the servants of noblemen and gentlemen, and some gentlemen and ladies themselves, for impor- tation, except in a very few instances which were had up, and then let fall at the desire of some great man or other, notwithstanding of the certificatione against connivers. " Yea, some Collonels of Regiments have provided the cloathing, at least of y r Officers, in England, and yet are free as is commonly re- ported. " And therefore, if the Parliament doo not think fitt to rescind the laws against silk, hair, and cotton, but will hear non-proposals of additions thereto, it is humbly and earnestly begged that they will seriously consider what is above represented, and the reasonableness of the demands of the Merchants." Notwithstanding the fines for non-attendance, the Assistants were occasionally absent from meetings, and those present, after waiting about an hour, generally adjourned, first taking care to order the absentees to be poinded. A seemingly very good mode of securing punctual attendance at meetings was fallen 47 Trials and Troubles of Edinburgh Merchants Attendance at Meetings 4 8 Historical Notes as to the Excuses Great Fire fallen on in 1704, as we read in the Minutes of the Master and Assistants, on 25th September 1704: " That the Master, Treasurer, and haill Assistants present, with the Clerk, are of opinion, nomine contradicente, that the consigning ot money will be more efficacious to oblige all due attendance than the signing of a Bond, and therefore resolve, that at the next sederunt the Master, Treasurer, and Clerk shall each of them consign 5, I2j., and each Assistant 2, 165.5 an< ^ that at every sederunt thereafter the Master, Treasurer and Clerk shall, when present, get out 145. each of them, and each Assistant present 75. ; and that the dividend falling due to them, as said is, shall, when they are absent without tymous and relevant excuse, be forfeited and put into the sero-box. And it is farther resolved and agreed, that when the first consignment shall be exhausted, they shall renew the same, according to the proportion and to the ends aoove written. Assistants occasionally sent excuses of their non-attendance at meetings, on the ground of their being absent in London. The journey in those days must have been a serious matter, as the mail-coach, about the year 1700, took 131 hours to go to London. On the night of the 3rd of February 1700, a great fire took place at the north-east corner of the Meal Market, and all the great pile of buildings on the east and south sides of the Par- liament Square or Close, with the Exchange, were burned to the ground. Some of the National Records were lost or de- stroyed on the occasion. It was computed that about 200 families were dislodged by this disaster. Many of the Mem- bers of the Company suffered by it. Accordingly, at the Meet- ing Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 49 ing of the Master and Assistants on the i9th February 1700, it is reported that there had been no Meeting since the 2oth January, "in consequence of the great fire, by which several concerned had their houses and shops, at least one of them, burnt and destroyed." On 24th April 1700, the Town Council having passed an Aft against immorality, and the Company " finding themselves in duty bound to do likewise, 1 ' specially referred to this fire in the following Resolution : " Att Edinburgh, the twenty-ninth day of May 1700 years. The which day the General Meeting of the Merchant Company of Edr. considering the great growth of Immoralities of all sorts, and the fear- ful rebuke of God by a dreadful fyre in the Parliament Close, Kirk- hewgh, and Cowgate, which happened the third day of February last, and other tokens of wrath lately come upon the city, and moved with the zeal of God and the tyes he hath laid on them, and that they have taken upon them to appear for him in their stations, Doe in the Lord's strength, Resolve to be more watchful over their hearts and ways than formerly, and each of them in their several capacities to Reprove vyce with due zeal and prudence as they shall have occasion, and to endea- vour to promote the vigorous execution of these good laws made for the suppressing of vyce and punishing of the vicious j and the said Company appoints their Clerk to read or move the reading hereof every Quarterly Meeting in tyme coming, under the penalty of twenty merks toties The Treasurer appears to have had considerable powers, as, at a General Meeting on 3oth November 1702, he reports having seemingly without any special authority borrowed 800 from George Watson, the Treasurer of the Maiden Hospital Aft against Immorality The Trea- surer 5 Historical Notes as to the Burgess's Daughters Clothiers Papers to be booked Hospital. This George Watson was the founder of the Hospital of that name. On 6th September 1703, it is unanimously agreed, that whatever young women, being Burgess's Daughters, have paid or shall pay their consignation as Merchant Traders, and from that time have paid and shall pay their quarter dues, if these women shall thereafter marry, their husbands shall not be obliged to pay their dues of upset unless they please, but shall have the benefit of their wives' consignation. Although the united businesses of cloth merchant and tailor are now met with on every hand, the amalgamation of them caused at first much complaint. On 2$rd O&ober 1 704, several members complain to a General Meeting " that their trade is almost ruined and taken out of their hands by unfreemen and women who have no privilege, and partly by tailors, who ought either to give over trade in merchandise, or to lay aside their calling as tailors. The Company authorize the Master and Assistants to convene before the Dean of Guild and his Court, such tailors as they know trade in merchan- dise, to the end that they may be obliged either to quit the same, or their calling as tailors." In O6lober 1697, the Master and Assistants being of opi- nion, " that it may be of dangerous consequence to the Com- pany to take their receipts, discharges, and other writs on loose papers, which are apt to be lost ; appointed all such to be written in a book, in all time coming. 1 ' It is much to be regretted Merchant Company of Edinburgh. regretted that this order was not better observed ; as, had it been, copies of many interesting papers conne&ed with the early history of the Company, now lost, would have been extant. At the same Meeting, " the said Master and Assistants being of opinion, that the said receipts and discharges should be writ by the Clerk to the Company : they, therefore, recom- mend to the Treasurer to cause inform the Clerk whenever he may have occasion to pay out money or take receipts or dis- charges, to the end the same may be writ by the Clerk." On ist February 1699, " in a Meeting of the Master and Assistants, called pro re nata, for ele&ing four children to be presented by them to the Maiden Hospital," the mother of one of the children " compeared personally with her said child, and declares solemnly that she is not able to maintain and edu- cate the said child." It was customary for the parents or friends thus to attend. At the same meeting, it was " ordered that John Baly, warn the hail Members of this Company to meet at the Plainstones before Bailie Bowden's shop, to-morrow, a quarter before two in the afternoon, to go in a body, with the Master, to James Blackwood's spouse's burial, at Bristo, and that under the penalty of fourteen shillings Scots, for each person that shall be warned and not attend, and that they be acquainted to be in mournings." The Company, owing to their position, had very easy access to the Scots Parliament. Of this we give an illustration. On 1 4th Clerk to write Receipts, &c. Presentations to Maiden Hospital Attendance at Funerals Historical Notes as to the Company and Parliament i^th August 1704, the Master reported that he had " given in to the Lord Register" a Representation as to Trade, agreed to at last meeting ; " and the same being called for in Parlia- ment by Sir Patrick Johnston, was read, and the masters of the silk manufaftories ordained to see and answer the same ; who having given in their answers, the Representation and an- swers are now lying before the Parliament." The meeting recommended to the Master and Treasurer, and such of the Assistants or other Members as they should call, to speak further to the Members of Parliament, and press the reading of the said Representation. On zist August 1704., the Master presented the draft of an A61 of Parliament, discharging the wearing of all manufac- tured silk, hair, and cotton, whether imported from abroad or manufaftured at home $ which being read, it was recom- mended to the Master, and such as he shall think fit, to call with him, to let Sir David Cunningham see the same, that he may put such amendments thereon as he shall think fit, before it be presented in Parliament ; and advise with the said Sir David, if it be necessary that there should be a draft of another A61 prepared and presented, allowing the import and wearing of all manufaftured silk, hair, and cotton, so that whichever of the two alternatives contained in the Merchants' Representation the Parliament shall most incline to go into, there may be an Aft drafted and presented, to answer the same j as, also, that the Master advise with the said Sir David, if Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 53 if it be necessary to draw replies to the answers given in by the masters of the silk manufactories. On 28th August 1704, the Master reported he had seen Sir David Cunningham, who drew out an A61 allowing the import and wearing of silk, hair, and cotton manufactures, and did also see the A6t formerly drawn discharging the same j both which were transferred, and clear doubles thereof given in to the several Members of Parliament ; but the same are not yet brought in to be considered in Parliament. As, also, he reports that Sir David thought it needless to draw any reply to the answers given in by the masters of the silk manufactories. We have quoted sufficient to shew the close communication betwixt Parliament and the Company. Though Unfreemen were ating injuriously to the Company, Members were unwilling to come forward openly and in- form against them. A happy idea, however, suggested itself; and at a meeting of the Company, held 9th June 1701, it " Overtured, that several regulations might be made in trade, and several abuses committed therein might be rectified, had all Members freedom to signify their mind and give information, without disobliging their particular friends and neighbours : And a motion being made, that a box be bought, with lock and key, and a slit in the head thereof, for receiving in writ, what any Members shall have to signify and in- form towards the end foresaid, the said motion was approven of, and the Treasurer appointed to buy the box : And it is recommended to all M em bers Company and Parliament Unfreemen 54 Historical Notes as to the Unfreemen New Members Members of this Society, who shall have anything to inform for regu- lation of trade or rectifying abuses, or that anyways may tend for the good of this Company, to put the same in writing, and give it in to the box, either at this meeting, or at any other meeting of Master and As- sistants, or of the haill Company : And for preventing the detecting of the person informer, it is ordained, that at every meeting for some time to come every person present shall, in order as they sit, give in a paper to the said box, whether writ or unwrit." It was frequently the custom for a Merchant who had not yet become a Burgess, and so was not entitled to admission into the Company, to pay, when called upon, his entry dues, but not to be formally received as a Member, or to be allowed to sign the record of entrants, until he obtained his Burgess Ticket. A considerable interval sometimes elapsed betwixt the date of payment and of admission ; and confusion was often the consequence. To obviate this in someway, it was, at a meeting held on 3rd January 1698, enacted and or- dained, " That in all time coming, when any Merchant enters to the Com- pany who is entered Surges, his ticket be produced as formerly to the Clerk, who is to write thereon the day of that person's paying his dues, entering, and being matriculate, and sign the same. And where any person consigns his dues, not being Burges, the Clerk is to give a line under his hand bearing the time of his consignation j and the Com- pany declare that, from and after the date of the said payments, the persons entering, as said is, shall be liable for their quarter dues, and not otherways [but they could not vote till they were Burgesses, and signed the book January 1700]; and seeing that this is a new trouble to the Clerk, they are of opinion that he may demand of each entrant half a merk above the former dues." The Merchant Com f any of Edinburgh. 55 The praftice of writing the certificate of entry on the back of the Burgess Ticket still continues. In 1726, the Company, who were now in the custom of meeting in the Council House (having let their property in the Cowgate), purchased a property in the "high Exchange," for a public hall. On 8th August 1751, the Company agreed to sell this property to the town to make way for new buildings j and on the aist of July 1752, there was a gene- ral meeting "called at the desire of the Lord Provost, who wanted this opportunity of laying before the Members the plans of the buildings proposed to be erefted on the north side of the street at the Cross, and on the ruins upon the south side of the Parliament Close. . . . And his Lordship having come to the meeting, he laid before them the plans of the foresaid build- ings, whereby it is intended to remove the front of the build- ings to be raised on the north side of the street at the Cross,a con- venient space backwards, and to have a handsome Exchange or public forum " and various other important buildings. And " his Lordship acquainted the meeting . . . that as the city revenue was not sufficient for answering so great an expense . . . it was proposed that the expense should be partly defrayed by sums raised by voluntary contributions. . . That as the Merchant Company was a very numerous body, and composed of many of the considerable trading burgesses of the city, to whose accommodation some part of what was proposed chiefly tended, he had judged it proper to lay the plans before them." The Old and New Exchange 56 Historical Notes as to the The Company, having considered this statement, agreed to subscribe towards the ereftion of the Exchange, not from the funds of the Company, but out of "their own private pockets."* Sale of Old On z6th December 1753, at a meeting in the "British Exchange Property Coffeehouse," the completion of the sale of the old Exchange property was reported, and the Treasurer laid before the meet- ing an extradt Aft of Council in favour of the Company, as part of the above transaction, which was read, and which the Master and Assistants appointed to be engrossed in this minute, whereof the tenor follows: Company to " Edinburgh, the 6th of December 1752 years, the which day the meet in the Town Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Council, with the Deacons of Crafts, Chambers ordinary and extraordinary, of the city of Edinburgh, being in council as- sembled, Treasurer Fairholme reported that on Friday last he had attended a meeting with the Master and Assistants of the Merchant Company anent the payment of seventy-three pounds sterling, as the price for the old Ex- change purchased by the city, when he found there was no Act of Coun- cil empowering him to make such payment, altho' the Disposition which is signed and extended, bears the foresaid price to be payed by the late Treasurer Mr Sands j which having been considered by the Magistrates and Council, They, with the Extraordinary Deacons, authorized Mr Fairholme, City Treasurer, to pay the foresaid sum of 73, and to take credit therefor in his Accompts. The same day the Treasurer further represented that at the time of making the foresaid purchase, it was amongst other things agreed upon to accommodate the Merchant Com- pany * The foundation stone of the Royal Exchange was laid on ijth September 1753. The building, including the area, cost ^31,000. Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 57 pany in some one or other of the City's publick places or rooms for the Company's meetings, in all time thereafter, free of any charges, as ap- pears by the Council's minutes, of date the Qth day of August last, albeit the same was not specially enacted by the said minute : Which having been considered by the Magistrates and Council, they, with the extraordinary Deacons, did, and hereby do, consent and agree, to accom- modate the said Company at all their meetings in time coming, with the use of some one or other of the City's publick places or rooms free of any expense, and appointed an Extract of these presents to be de- livered to the Preses of the Merchant Company. " Extracted upon this and the preceding page furth of the Council Records of the said City by "Jo. G. WILLIAMSON." Down to the year 1734, the Company had confined their at- tention solely to the management of their own trade, the super- intendence of the hospitals, and the relief of their poor. They now, however, commenced to take part in a wider field, and, from this time downwards, the history of the Company, as re- gards questions of general public importance, may be said to be the history of the city itself. Owing to the great influence of the Company the various measures supported by them were very generally successful ; and many attempts were made to secure their countenance and support in matters also of lesser moment. It would, however, tire our readers were we particularly to advert to the numerous public questions referred to in the Records ; but for the sake of after reference we shall note some of them. We may premise that the whole proceedings of the Company in re- lation to the admission of members, the protection of its trade, the creation and management of its charities, and the part it took Place of Meet- ing of Com- pany provided by Town Company begin to take part in gene- ral Matters Historical Notes as to the Company Records in public questions, have, with the exception of the years from 1714. to 1725 (of which no written records are preserved), been recorded in the Minutes of the Company, down to the present time; and the Records, therefore, offer most tempting pages from which to quote. The Minutes of the Company are contained in the Record of Entrants before alluded to, and the fifteen following volumes : VOL. I. From 1696 to 1704 VOL. II. From 170410 1714 VOL. III. (defective to 1733) From I 7 1 4 to J 74^ VOL. IV From 174610 1767 VOL. V. From 1767 to 1783 VOL. VI .. From 1783 to 1802 VOL. VII. From 1^02 to 1813 VOL. VIII. From 1813 to 1819 VOL. IX From 181910 1825 VOL. X. From 1825 to 1829 VOL. XI From 182910 1834 VOL. XII. From 183410 1839 VOL. XIII From 1839 to 1847 VOL. XIV From 1847 to 1854 VOL. XV. _ From 1854 to 1862 One of the matters which engaged the Company, so far back as 1687, sounds not unlike that which agitated the Com- pany within the last few months, and in which Sir William Johnston did such good service : " The Company appoints application to be made to the Magistrates for taking off the imposition on shops for cleansing of the streets." The Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 59 The Company, in March 1734, petition the Committee of the Convention of the Royal Burghs, in favour of summary diligence on bills being allowed, as well for the expenses of that diligence as for the principal sum and interest. The year 1736 was an eventful one in Edinburgh, as it was in September that the murder of Captain Porteous took place in the Grassmarket, an occurrence which is described so vividly in Sir Walter Scott's famous Heart of Mid-Lothian. The Company did their utmost to defend Edinburgh against the unjust aspersions levelled at it by the Government. As is well known, Queen Caroline was so indignant when she heard of the riot and murder, that it is reported Her Majesty " in the height of her displeasure, told the celebrated John Duke of Argyll, that sooner than submit to such an insult, she would make Scotland a hunting field." " In that case, Madame," answered that high-spirited nobleman, with a profound bow, " I will take leave of your Majesty, and go down to my own country to get my hounds ready." The import of this reply, continues Sir Walter, had " more than met the ear j and as most of the Scottish nobility and gentry seemed actuated by the same national spirit, the royal displeasure was necessarily checked in mid-volley, and milder courses were recommended and adopted." A Bill, however, was brought into the House of Lords, intitled, " An Aft to disable Alexander Wilson, Esquire, from taking, hold- ing, or enjoying any office or place in the Magistracy in the City of Edinburgh, Bills Porieous Mob 6o Historical Notes as to the Porteous Mob Edinburgh, or elsewhere in Great Britain, and for imprisoning the said Alexander Wilson ; and for abolishing the Guard kept up in the said city, commonly called the Town Guard j and for taking away the Gates of the Nether Bow Port, and keeping open the same." The Company resolved to defend the Lord Provost Wil- son, and prepared a petition, praying to be heard by counsel. This petition gives the opinion of the Company as to the origin of the Porteous riots : " Your petitioners look with the utmost detestation and abhorrence upon the late riotous tumults, and the most inhuman murder commit- ted in it on Captain John Porteous, in open violence of all law and justice, contempt of government, and presumptuous obstruction of royal mercy : . . . That, so far as your petitioners know, after all the enquiry that hath been made for discovering the authors and actors of that seditious riot and cruel murder, we have good reason to say, that no one citizen or householder was concerned, and that the same was carried on by strangers, and the very meanest of the popu- lace, unknown to us : . . . That the taking away of the City Guard, and laying open the gates of the Nether Bow Port, besides the ignominy of these being done at such a juncture, will be attended with dangers and inconveniences to the peace and safety of the city, and to the public revenue." The petition, it may be mentioned, though sent to Lon- don, was withdrawn, on the advice of counsel, that it ought not to be presented, " if it is intended to serve the Provost of the city. Besides, if it is presented, we think the House of Lords will either reject it, or order it to lie on the table." The Bill met with stout opposition from the Duke of Argyll, but was, nevertheless, sent down to the House of Commons, Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 61 Commons, where the Scotch Members exerted themselves strenuously in the defence of their capital. The clauses for imprisoning the Lord Provost, abolishing the City Guard, and removing the Nether Bow Port, 'were left out, and a fine of 2000 imposed on the city for the benefit of Porteous's widow. On 1 8th April 1737, the Company had under considera- tion the amendment of the Pedlar Aft. On loth November 1738, proposals were laid before the Company for building and endowing an hospital or work- house for maintaining and employing the poor of the city. On z8th February 1739, they petitioned the House of Commons as to the late Convention with Spain. On 4th August 1740, thanks were voted to the Duke of Argyll for his public-spirited conduft $ and, on loth September 1745, there was an Address to His Majesty on " his safe arrival in the British Dominions, after the pains your Majesty has been taking abroad to secure Europe from the boundless and wicked ambition of France." We now come to the year 1745, when Prince Charles Stuart landed in Scotland, raised the Highland standard at Glenfinnan, and arrived with his followers at Edinburgh on 1 7th September. The Company during these troublous times remained, as it has always done, honourably loyal, and took the first opportunity of presenting the following Address to King George : Porteous Mob Pedlar Aft Workhouse and other Matters The Preten- der, 1745 or THt UNIVERSITY OF Address to the King Historical Notes as to the "To the King's Most Excellent Majesty, the humble Address of the Merchant Company of the City of Edinburgh. "Most Gracious Sovereign, "When some deluded and perjured men, aided by the barbarous Inhabitants of the more remote parts of the Country, and Instigated by the Tool of our Inveterate and ambitious Enemies, dared to disturb your Majestie's mild and legal Government, our Duty and Inclination called upon us to declare our readiness to defend your Ma- jesty and our happy Constitution, with our hands and fortunes : We have shown in some small measure that we were sincere, That our honest Intentions were not so successfull as we wished, will, we hope, appear not to have been our fault. " Sensible of the many inestimable blessings our fathers and we have enjoyed since the Happy Revolution, and which can only be secured to us by the continuance of the Crown in your Majesty's Royal House, vain were all the arts of secret Treachery and open violence to make us change the best of Kings for ane abjured Pretender, the blessings of Li- berty for arbitrary power, and the Protestant Religion for Papal tyranny and persecution. '* Your Majestie's tender care in sending so seasonably His Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland to Scotland, whose name was the terror of the Rebels, and whose valour and conduct has, under God, totally defeated their daring and perfidious attempt, cannot fail to inspire us with the most grateful sentiments. " The known Union of Britons during the late struggle, some few excepted, must demonstrate how delusive the hopes, and how fatal to themselves the conduct of such as would enslave a free and brave people, and will, we trust, at once extinguish the most sanguine Expectations of all your Majestie's and our Enemies, and more firmly establish our happy Constitution, which they intended to destroy. " That your Majesty may long reign over and in the hearts of a free and happy people, and that there may never be wanting one of your August House to perpetuate the Blessing of your Government, nor one of Merchant Company of Edinburgh. of your family to add Lustre to the British Crown, and to be the De- fenders of the Liberties of Mankind, is the prayer of " Signed and sealed in presence of, and by appoint- ment of the Compy. " ARCHD. ANGUS. "EDINBURGH, i May 1746." On 23d June 1746, there is a meeting to consider how the Sett of Burgh might be altered and improved, " and made more agreeable to the constitution of Britain, where the people are represented and governed by men of their own choice ; " and, on 4th August 1746, proposed amendments were reported. On 1 7th February 1749, proposals for support of the poor of the city were again considered. On 8th April 1760, the Company have under consideration the city's application to Parliament as to bringing water into the city, and laying a tax on the inhabitants for same. On a8th November 1760, the Company present an Address of Condolence to the Crown on the death of George II. On ist April 1761, there is a General Meeting called to consider as to a proper person to represent the city in Parliament. A majority of the Town Council having invited a peer of the realm to name a proper person, the Company expressed their strong disapproval of this conduct j and it was stated that the " bad etfefts of this measure already appeared ; for though this city had ever since the Union been represented in Parliament by one of its own citizens, except in one instance, when our Member Sett of Burgh Death of George II. Company pro- tests against interference of Peers and Strangers at Eleftions 6 4 Historical Notes as to the City Repre- sentation Company's Support asked for a Parliament Candidate Member was a gentleman of estate in the neighbourhood, and who, for most part, was a residenter in town 5 yet, on the pre- sent occasion, it was believed the person recommended, and consequently to be chosen, is so far from being a citizen, that he is a stranger in town, and even in this part of the country : that they are far from saying that the gentleman's being born in South Britain incapacitates him from being a Member for North Britain, as they look upon England and Scotland as now happily making but one nation ; but they cannot help thinking that it was the intention of the Legislature, in order- ing Members to be chosen by the different counties and burghs, that such Members should be well acquainted with the consti- tution, interest, and inclinations of those they represented, that the Parliament, when met, might be fully instrufted in what concerned every particular part of the nation." The Company direfted that their opinions should be com- municated to the Lord Provost. On 3rd April 1761, Mr John Fordyce attended a meeting of Master- Assistants, intimated his resolution to stand candidate to represent the city in Parliament, and asked the support of the Company. The meetings of the Company about this time took place in " John's Coffee-house" and the " Exchange Coffee-house." On 22nd April 1761, at a meeting of the Master and As- sistants, it was reported that John Osburn, merchant, late Pro- vost of Edinburgh, had left to the Company, for behoof of George Merchant Company of Edinburgh. George Watson's Hospital, 851, zs. ^d. sterling, under bur- den of a certain annuity. On 22nd April 1762, the Master and Assistants asked to concert some method for discouraging English Riders from coming to this country. The following had sometime before been extensively signed in Edinburgh : Resolution and Agreement amongst certain Merchants of Edin- burgh, to discourage English Eiders from coming into Scotland, dated tfh June 1754. " We Subscribers, Merchants in Edinburgh, considering that the giving orders or commissions to English Riders, or Clerks to. English Merchants, when they come to this city, tends greatly to the dis- tru&ion of the wonted wholesale trade thereof, from which most of the towns in Scotland used to be furnished with goods, and that some of these English Riders not only enhances the said wholesale trade, but also corresponds with and sells goods to private families and persons at the same prices and rates as if to us in a wholesale way ; and that their frequent journeys to this place are attended with high charges, which, consequently, must be laid on the cost of those goods we buy from them j and that we can be as well served in goods by a written com- mission by post, as little or no regard is had by them to the patterns or colours of goods which we order them to send when they are here j therefore, and for the promoting of trade, we hereby voluntarily bind and oblige ourselves, that in no time coming, from and after the date hereof, we, nor either of us, nor any person by our order, or on our account, shall give any personal order or commission for any goods we deal in to any English Dealer, Clerk, or Rider whatever, who shall come to Scotland j and, also, that after the first day of January next, we shall in no shape whatever have any dealings or traffic with any people in England, who shall, after that date, make a practice of coming themselves, English Riders 66 Historical Notes as to the English Riders Insult to the Master themselves, or sending Clerks or Riders into Scotland : and in case either of us shall at any time aft contrary to one or both of these obligations, we bind and oblige ourselves, upon our being convift thereof, voluntarily, and without any process of law, to pay to the Treasurer of the Charity Workhouse of this city, for the time being, for the use of the said house, the sum of Two Pounds Two Shillings, sterling money, toties quoties, for each time we are so convicted, which Treasurer is hereby fully authorized and empowered to sue for, levy, and receive the same. And we consent to the registration hereof in the books of Council and Session, or any others competent, therein to remain for preservation ; or, if need be, that letters of horning on six days charge, and all other executorials needful may pass hereon in form as effeirs. And for that effecl:, we constitute our Pro'rs, &c. In Witness whereof, we have subscribed these pre- sents, written on stamped vellum, by William Dun, Writer in Edin- burgh, at Edinburgh, the fifth day of June, One Thousand Seven Hun- dred and Fifty Two years, before these witnesses, George Waddell, Chair- master in Edinburgh, and the said William Dun. On 3oth August 1762 certain operations of the Turnpike Road Trustees under consideration. The Company shewed a due knowledge of the respect due to them, and would not brook any affront, whether at the hands of strangers or their own members. On the 9th November 1762, they resolved to complain to the Lords of the Admiralty, that, having reported to the Lord Provost their opinion that Captain Keith Stuart, appointed to watch the enemy's priva- teers on the coast of Scotland, was not closely attending to his duty, the Captain had come to Edinburgh " a few days thereafter, and, in a most ungentlemanly manner, insulted the Preses Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Preses with abusive language, and threatened him with per- sonal injury or, to use his own words, ' that he would break every bone in his body.' The Company, therefore, demanded reparation for this insult." Before the despatch of this letter, the family of Galloway applied to the Company, earnestly re- questing them not to forward their complaint to the Admiralty ; and at a meeting on 27th December, the following letter was read and accepted. It shews very clearly that it was considered a dangeious proceeding to risk the enmity of the Company. "LONDON, December nth 1762. "To Mr Alexander Brown, Preses of the Merchant Company, Edinburgh, " SIR, Mr Todd, in the course of our correspondence, informed me how much you and the Merchant Company, in which you have the honour to preside, took amiss some expressions to you which escaped me before I left Edinburgh. You must be sensible, Sir, that you gentle- men on shore, are bred to a delicacy of expression which we seafaring people are often deficient in, but we have sometimes the sense to reflect, and the honesty to acknowledge our error, which I now do to the Com- pany and their President, as the most honorable reparation I can make. I am well apprised from my friend Todd of your readiness to forgive and forget mistakes, and hope you will yourself accept of this apology, and favour me with your good offices to make it acceptable to the Company, for whom I have a great regard, and who I am very sorry to have offended. Your compliance will much oblige, Sir, Your hum- ble servant, K.STUART." " P.S. I have entreated my good friend the Lord Provost to make any further apology for me he may think necessary." We have said that the Company would not permit any in- dignity Reparation for Insult 68 Historical Notes as to the Misconduft of Assistants dignity even from their own Members. The following is an illustration of this : " The Master acquainted the General Meeting, that some of the Assistants had the assurance, in a constituted Meeting of the Master and Assistants, within these few days, to tell him that they and others had concerted to absent themselves from this meeting, to the end there might not be a sufficient quorum of a General Meeting, and that there- by the Annual Election of the Office-bearers of the Company might be disappointed." The Company desired the Master to name these Assistants, which he did. " Whereupon the General Meeting testified their highest displea- sure with the conduct of these Members, not only for their wilfully ab- senting themselves from this meeting but also for throwing such indig- nity upon the Master, in character of Master, and upon the Company, and for acting contrary to the trust reposed in them at their election, when the most valuable rights and privileges of the Company are lodg- ed in their hands, and which they now endeavour to destroy ; and the Company reserve to themselves to consider what further notice shall be taken of this affair." No further mention is made in the Minutes of this matter. On the 25th January 1763, complaints against the manage- ment of Heriot's Hospital are considered. On 3rd June 1763, Sett of the City again under discussion. On 29th August, an application being about to be made to Parliament for augmenting the tolls payable at the several toll bars near the city, the Company and other public bodies intimated their intention to oppose it, whereupon the measure was abandoned. On Merchant Company of Edinburgh. On and July 1764, the Earl of Morton, Lord Clerk Regis- ter, wrote to the Master, proposing to purchase an area in the Excise-Office Garden, " whereupon to build public offices for the safe custody of the writs of the kingdom that come into the custody of the clerks of the Supreme courts." The matter did not go further. On i6th December 1766, the Lord Provost having writ- ten to the Master, inclosing a draft of an Acl of Parliament for the extension of the Royalty over the ground lying to the north of the then city, the Company expressed their approval of it. On 1 7th April 1767, the Company apply to Parliament to delay the Forth and Clyde Canal Bill. On 2ist September 1767, thanks voted to Sir Lawrence Dundas " for 300 to poor of the Company, and 200 to their Maiden Hospital j" and, on i9th O&ober 1767, the Company instruft the Master to communicate to the Lord Provost and Council their opinion that Sir Lawrence Dundas should be asked to become Member of Parliament. On nth May 1769, mortification reported in favour of Com- pany by Mrs Isobel Beech or Drummond, relicT: of George Beech, Merchant in Edinburgh, the interest to be applied in supporting in the Trinity Hospital "a decayed Merchant Burgess of Edinburgh, and Member of the said Merchant Com- pany, or the relicT: or lawfiil son or daughter of such Merchant Burgess and Member of the said Merchant Company, with a preference Cowgate Property Extension of Royalty Canal Bill Sir Lawrence Dundas Beech's Morti- fication Historical Notes as to the Bankruptcy Bill, &c. Forms of Pi ocedure Abuses of Trade Mortmain Aft Preses of Watson's Hospital preference for (i) those named Beech, and (2) those named Drummond." On 1 5th February 1771, Bankruptcy Bill and law as to Bills and Promissory Notes considered. On aoth June 1772, there was a meeting in the High Coun- cil House, at four o'clock in the afternoon, held in consequence of a requisition to the Preses " by several members desiring a general meeting this day on a matter of public concern." One of the requisitionists having stated the obje& of the meeting, it was agreed that as the matter has not first been laid before the Master and Assistants, it did not come regularly before the meeting, and therefore the Company remitted it to the Master and Assistants." On i pth Oftober 1772, general meeting as to abuses in trade. On 1 8th May 1773, Company resolved to oppose Mortmain A6t relating to the vesting of the property of mortmain estates in the public funds. On 2nd June 1773, letter from Sir Law- rence Dundas, that Bill would not pass at least this session. On 28th December 1773, at a meeting in the Exchange Coffee-house, amongst other matters, one of the members stated " that the business of the two Hospitals was at present at a stand, occasioned by, as he thought, a very irregular procedure of the Governors of Watson's Hospital, finding that the Master of the Company (who, in virtue of his office, is Preses of both Hospitals), has no right to vote along with the other Gover- nors, but only a casting vote in case of the votes being equal, whereby Merchant Company of Edinburgh. whereby he thought the rights of the Company were greatly infringed." The meeting remitted consideration of the matter to the Master and Assistants, but nothing further appears to have been done. On 1 6th Oftober 1775, Bill as to improvements at North Bridge considered. On 8th January 1778, letter from Lord Provost as to rais- ing a Regiment of Foot, to be called the Edinburgh Volun- teers. Company agree to subscribe towards it. On 24th December 1778, the Preses (Thomas Elder) laid before the meeting the " great outlines " of a plan for rais- ing a fund for a provision to the Widows of Members of the Company. This was the first step in the establishment of the wealthy Widows' Fund, founded in 1826-27. On nth January 1779, Company resolve to take into con- sideration the general alarm spread over this part of the United Kingdom, by a Bill said to be intended to be brought into Parliament to repeal the penal laws of King William against Popery in Scotland. The Company resolved to oppose the Bill. On 1 9th Oftober 1778, Company being empowered and required by the Statutes of George Watson's Hospital to take all proper care that these Statutes are duly observed, and for that end the Governors are appointed at all times to make the minutes, writings, records, and accounts patent to the Com- pany, or such of their number as they shall authorize ; and as, from the opening of the Hospital, the Company had not exer- ci^ed North Bridge Volunteers Widows' Fund Popery Watson's Hospital Records Historical Notes as to the City Member Police Tax, Mr James Jollie elected Joint-Clerk cised this power, they now remitted to a special committee to examine these books, papers, and accounts, and to report. On 30th August 1779, Report brought up, considered, and ap- proved of. On 23rd Oftober 1780, the Company congratulate Mr William Miller, on his ele&ion as Member of Parliament for Edinburgh : certain Members, however, protested against this. At the same meeting, it was moved by Mr Hunter Blair, and agreed to, that the Preses write to the Lord President of the Court of Session, the Lord Chief Baron of the Court of Exchequer, the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, and the Keeper of the Signet, that it is the unanimous wish of this Company that these great and respe&able bodies of citi- zens may join with the Magistrates and Town Council, and citizens at large, in an application to Parliament, that the taxes for the support of the police and civil government of this city may be levied equally upon all the inhabitants within the Royalty. The result does not appear. On loth June 1783, Resolutions of Company against pro- posed tax on bills, notes, receipts, and discharges. On ist September 1783, Mr James Jollie was conj'oined as Clerk to the Company, along with Mr James Forrest, Writer to the Signet. Mr Jollie continued Clerk for a very long period of years. On nth December 1783, Mr John Thompson, Account- ant Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 73 tant in Edinburgh, asked permission to dedicate The Universal Calculator to the Company j and, as it was " a superior work," the Company gave their consent ! On 1 4th March 1783, proceedings against "unfree traders, hawkers who open temporary shops in the town," con- sidered. On aand March 1786, the Company have before them the heads of a new Bill for the support of the poor, trans- mitted by the Lord Provost and Magistrates, to the Company. On 9th January 1797, Resolutions against Sunday mails. Company, at same meeting, propose to purchase a new hall. On 5th March 1790, Members consider as to raising funds to support a proposed new prison in Edinburgh. Company approve of building of same. On 2nd June 1 792, Company resolve to meet in their Hall on Monday next, immediately after the public celebration of His Majesty's birth ; or sooner, in case of any appearance of riot. The meeting were of opinion that their own Hall was fully a more proper place to meet in than the Council Chamber, which is the rendezvous appointed by the Aft of Council in case of mobs 5 and this alteration in the place of meeting was under- stood by the magistrates, and met their approbation. On 7th June 1792, the Company lay down certain rules to check dis- turbances in the city, and resolve " to subscribe fifty guineas to be given as a reward for the discovery of the leaders and instigators of the late disturbances, or of the writers of any of the incendiary letters, or seditious advertisements, which have lately Book dedica- ed to Com- pany Unfree Traders Poor Sunday Mails New Prison Riots 74 Town- Council and Merchant Company Seditious Meetings Address to the King Historical Notes as to the lately appeared, it being understood that Members should themselves subscribe without encroaching upon the general funds of the Company. On 1 3th June 1792, the Lord Provost, on behalf of the Ma- gistrates and Town Council, and as directed " by them, pre- sented to the Master, Assistants, and individual Members of the Company, their most sincere and grateful acknowledge- ments for the very cheerful and ready promise of support and assistance in case of a continuance of the disturbances.'" It will have been noticed, from many of these extracts, that the Town Council and Company worked for many years most harmoniously together. Having but one aim, they consulted together in nearly all important local questions, and, hand-in- hand, advanced the interests of the city. On nth December 1793, the Company pass resolutions against the " lawless proceedings of a set of persons styling themselves " the British Convention," and in aid of suppress- ing all seditious meetings." On 4th September 1 797, Company resolve to apply for a new Aft of Parliament for enlarging their powers. On 6th June 1800, at a full meeting of the Company, they agreed to address the King, congratulating him on the failure of " the late atrocious and diabolical attempt against his sacred person." The first five or six years of the nineteenth century found the Company busily engaged with discussions about a police bill, Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 75 bill, the corn laws, the north mail, stamp duty on promissory notes, and taxes on bank notes. On 1 3th November 1806, the Company lost an honoured Member in Sir William Forbes, nephew of Lords Forbes and Pitsligo. He served his apprenticeship with Messrs Coutts & Company, bankers. He became a partner of the concern in 1761, and two years afterwards the well-known firm of " Sir William Forbes, J. Hunter, & Company " was formed. In 1783, they began to issue notes which were received as readily throughout Scotland as the coin of the realm. In 1786, Sir William consented to fill the office of Master of the Merchant Company, but he frequently declined representing the city in Parliament. He also refused an Irish peerage. At one time he was a member of the celebrated " London Literary Club/' where he became acquainted with Samuel Johnson, Sir Joshua Reynolds, and other eminent literati. He wrote a life of Dr Beattie, which appeared in 1806, and passed through several editions, and he took a most active part in the originating and managing of many of the Edinburgh philanthropic institu- tions.* In Oftober 1809, the Company formed part of the procession at laying the foundation-stone of a bastion at Leith Docks, the Earl of Moira, afterwards Marquis of Hastings, officiating on the occasion. This day (the 25th October), was held as a Jubilee throughout Corn Laws, &c. Sir William Forbes Company Procession * Anderson's History of Edinburgh, p. 308. Historical Notes as to the Lord Provost Coulter i8o to 1817 East India Trade, &c. throughout Great Britain, George III. having entered on the fiftieth year of his reign. In April 1810, the Company attended the funeral of the Lord Provost (Coulter), of whom so many carious stories are still extant, amongst others, that on one occasion, when replying to the toast of his health, he assured the Company " that though he had the body of a stocking-weaver, he had the soul of a Sheepio Afreecanus" (Scipio Africanus). His funeral was a very gorgeous one. The other two Lord Provosts who have died in office (Adam Brown in October 1711, and Alexander Kincaid in January 1777) had also a public funeral procession. During the seven years following 1810, the Company, amongst other subjefts, had under consideration, trade with the East Indies (1812); a new police bill (1812); the appren- tice tax (1812) 5 resolutions against advance on prices at which grain was imported (1813); distillation from grain (1813); proposition for widow's scheme (1813); amendment of the Bankrupt A61 (1813); Union Canal (1814); corn laws (1814.); trial by jury (1815); resolutions against shop tax (1815)5 new police bill (1815); enlarged nomination of justices of the peace for the city (1816); restriction on hawkers and petty itinerant merchants (1817); widow's scheme, alterations on Watson's Hospital statutes, and burgh reform. The igth of November 1817 was a day of mourning in Edinburgh Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 77 Edinburgh the burial day of the Princess Charlotte of Wales (the presumptive heiress to the British throne, and consort of Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg), and her child. The Com- pany approved of suspending business that day, " as a becom- ing tribute to the memory of this most amiable and excellent Princess, whose unlooked-for death had involved the whole country in the deepest affliction." Shortly afterward, the Company resolved on an Address to His Royal Highness the Prince Regent, and another to the Prince of Saxe-Coburg, on the death of the Princess. The gas bill was before the Company this year. In April of the following year (1818), it may be mentioned, the shops and some of the streets were lighted with gas a great im- provement on the old oil lamps. In 1818, it was proposed to remove the General Post-Office from the Old Town to the Regent Bridge. A considerable number of the Company were strongly opposed to this. Some of the objections stated by the Company to the removal sound curiously at this date. The Company shortly afterwards pre- sented a petition to the Lords Commissioners of His Majesty's Treasury against the removal ; and it may be remarked that this petition runs in the name of " The Company of Mer- chants of the City of Edinburgh, who are composed of a very numerous body of merchants, bankers, and retail dealers, *wfio mostly carry on their business within the antient Royalty of the city." About Death of Princess Charlotte Gas Post-Office Members in Old Town Historical Notes as to the Burgh Reform Supported by Company About this time (1817-18), the Company were taking an enthusiastic interest in the then all important subjecl of Burgh Reform. The matter had been frequently before the Com- pany, and on iyth November 1817 there was a very large meeting of the Company (269 Members) to consider it. Mr Adam Black, seconded by Mr Archibald Anderson, moved as follows : First, That this Company views with great satisfaction the exertions now making to introduce into the Scottish Burghs a more rational and liberal system of town polity, and considers the sound and enlightened principles displayed at the set of Montrose, so congenial to the spirit of the British Constitution, as reflecting the highest honour on the Lord- Advocate of Scotland and his Majesty's Privy Council, and eminently conducive to the welfare of the community, and the respectability of the Magistracy. Second, That this Company being deeply interested in every thing con- nedled with the good of the city j and being the only chartered body of Merchant Burgesses, consider themselves particularly called upon to use every exertion to procure for the Burgesses that influence in the admini- stration of their own affairs to which they are entitled, and to promote such improvements in the set of the city as will conduce to their prosperity. The Master, seconded by Mr Samuel Anderson, moved cer- tain counter resolutions, to the effecl: that Mr Black's should be rejected; but, on a division, 176 voted with Mr Adam Black, and only 87 against him. On loth August 1818, after hearing a report from the Burgh Reform Committee, Mr Adam Black moved " that the Merchant Company of Edinburgh. the sum of one hundred guineas be voted from the funds of the Company, to be placed at the disposal of the Committees who have united for the purpose of endeavouring to procure a moie liberal system of town polity." A counter motion was made, on the ground that the grant "was contrary to the Company's Charter, and injurious to the" interests of their poor," and a number of Members being impressed with this view, and others taking the same side on different grounds, Mr Black's motion was lost by 103 to 75. Immediately afterwards, a private subscription was commenced amongst the Members, and nearly 200 raised in a few days. The discussions at this time led to some temporary party- feeling amongst the Members j and at a meeting of the Master and Assistants, it was stated that it was in contemplation by some of the Members to propose leets of the Master and As- sistants for the ensuing year, without any previous commu- nication with the Master and Assistants. This was found to be the case j as, at a numerously attended meeting of the Com- pany, on 3ist August 1818, an opposition leet to that of the Master and Assistants was proposed by Mr Archibald Ander- son, seconded by Mr Archibald Craig. The meeting was nearly equally divided, but the Master declared that the majority was in favour of his motion ; a declaration that was afterwards unsuccessfully called in question. The leet of 3 for Master, 36 for Assistants, and 3 for Treasurer, lay on the table, according to custom, till the next meeting, on the yth September, 79 Burgh Reform Opposition Leets 8o Historical Notes as to the Lord Cockburn on Merchant Company September, at which there was again a very large attendance 258 Members. A motion that the minutes of the previous general meeting "be not approved of," on the ground of the alleged mistake as to the division, was negatived by 143 to 123. Sir William Forbes, Bart., as Master, the twelve As- sistants, and the Treasurer, were then appointed. It is in reference to the divisions at these last-mentioned meetings, that Lord Cockburn amusingly refers, in his Memo- rials of his Time. We extract a few sentences : " The natural tendency of the folly of the Government in the Burgh Reform question, appeared this year in certain civic proceedings, which, though of no importance in themselves now, are curious historically, and as marking the gradual but rapid rise of popular opinion. " The Merchant Company of Edinburgh, instituted in 1681, was the only respectable mercantile body this unmercantile place possessed. And it had considerable influence . . . Individually, its magnates were very good men, but publicly, its ' Master ' and his * Twelve Assist- ants ' were a King and a House of Lords without the Commons. The people, however, had their Peter Wentworths, who now began to shew that they were no longer to be frightened by hard words. In August 1818, the great men of the last generation were confounded by hearing it seriously proposed to give 100 of the funds in aid of Burgh Reform, which the opponents of this measure now treated as merely a Whig and Tory question. The revolutionary motion was rejected, but only by a small majority. The victory of its authors was, however, complete when they were within two votes of annihilating the system altogether, on a motion denying the Master's privilege of appointing the other office- bearers, and claiming this power for the Company at large. On this the old school withdrew , and the Society has since managed its own affairs, and obtained due public weight." The Merchant Company oj Edinburgh. 81 The two or three subsequent years for we must abbreviate our Notes were partly taken up with meetings as to checking contagious fevers (1818) ; an Address to the Prince Regent on death of the Queen (1818) j qualifications of Members (1819) ; legacy of 105 from Mr Andrew Mein, a Member of the Com- pany (1819) 5 Widows' Scheme (1819) ; vote of thanks to Sir William Forbes, the retiring Master, " for the trouble he has taken in the Company's affairs, and for the dignity and pro- priety with which he has fulfilled the duties of the chair" (1819) ; Address to the King on the death of his father, and on his accession to the throne (1820) ; Widows' Fund, police bill, extra mails (1820); petition to Parliament as to duties on coal (1820) ; improvements on St Giles's Church (1821) ; ferries between Mid- Lothian and Fife (1821) ; Admiralty Bill (1821) ; Leith Walk toll-bar (1821) ; report on Burgh Re- form (1821); Bankrupt Act (1821); police bills (1822); road-money bill (1822) ; Scotch burghs bill (1822)5 burgh accounts bill (1822); and a number of other matters. In many of the above-mentioned aftings, the Company's efforts were supported by the Chamber of Commerce, which had been commenced in 1785, and was incorporated in 1786.* In 1820, the Company very deliberately considered, and strongly * A very interesting account of the Chamber of Commerce, written by Mr George Harrison, now one of the Assistants of the Merchant Company, was printed in the same Press as these Notes, and for the use of the Members, in 1859. It has since been repiinted with additions. 1818 to 1822, Chamber of Commerce 82 Restrictions on Foreign Trade King's visit Historical Notes as to the strongly opposed, restri&ions on foreign trade. They also petitioned Parliament to remove these restrictions. The fol- lowing is an excerpt from this able petition : " Great Britain and France, it must be admitted, are mutually destined for carrying on an extensive and mutually advantageous trade j and yet the restrictions imposed by both countries have checked, and now almost annihilate this trade. To the petitioners it appears that a modification of the duties on the importation of the wines and the cambrics of France, and on such other commodities as to the wisdom of Parliament may appear to be proper, would tend greatly to increase the demand for the manufactures of this country; and that while' this could be done without incurring any loss to the revenue of this country, or any great injury to any class of individuals here, it might be supposed from its liberality, to dispose the French to recede in an equal degree from restrictions on their part." This petition, as well as many of the other petitions, when read in the light of subsequent events, says much for the far- sighted and liberal views of the Company. Much stir was caused amongst the Merchant Company, as well as other public bodies, by the announcement, in July 1822, of the intention of George IV. to visit Edinburgh in August, no Sovereign of the House of Hanover having before entered the city. On the 2nd August 1822,* there was a general meeting held, at which an Address to His Majesty was agreed to, * Hitherto, from 1681, it was always the pratice to mention in the minutes the names of every Member present at the general meetings; but at this meeting this was not done, nor has it been done since. Merchant Company of Edinburgh. to, and the Master and Assistants were directed to wait on His Majesty and present it. The Company agreed, also, to take part in the public ceremonial on His Majesty's progress from Holyrood House to the Castle ; and on 6th August, it is intimated, that three hundred of the Members were expected to be present. The dress to be worn by the Members, like other citizens on the day of procession, was a blue coat, with white vest, and white or nankeen underdress; and it was specially directed that no Member should appear in black. A commemorative ornament was also to be worn by the Company, a figure i or emblem (according to the taste of the Members) in silver, | or in silk, upon a blue silk ground, of an oval or circular form, edged with a double row of narrow blue-and-white silk ribbon, worn on the left breast. The banner of the Company, made specially for the purpose, displayed the matriculated arms of the Company, painted on a white silk ground ; and it was to be borne by the junior Member of the Company, who was directed to take his station on the left of the Master and Assistants, who, on the other hand, were to take their stations in the centre, when the Members came into their places on the street. The place allotted for the accommodation of the Members and their clerks and apprentices, was a space marked off, and extending from Writers' Court to the Fishmarket Close, and was calculated to accommodate 1000 individuals. The Members and those conne6led with them, were to assemble within King's visit to Edinburgh Historical Notes as to the Contest for Mastership Lord Provost Henderson within the Royal Exchange, and be there arranged by the Master and Assistants, who were to wear distinguishing marks, viz., white wands. It was calculated that nearly 300,000 people saw their Sovereign on his entrance into the city on i5th August. It was on the 22nd that he made a royal progress from Holy- rood to the Castle. Hurrying over a few succeeding years (including the great fire and speculation mania year of 1824.), we come to 1826, when a great stir was caused in the Company by the novel occurrence of a contest for the Mastership of the Company. The late Lord Provost, Alexander Henderson of Press, was proposed in opposition to Mr Robert Scott ; and, after a keen contest, Mr Henderson was elecled, on 4th September 1826, by 148 votes against 136. Mr Henderson did not long, however, enjoy the office, as he died on 5th February of the following year. His history is instructive. He came to Edinburgh, a boy, from Peebles- shire j engaged, first as an apprentice, and then master, with a seed-merchant j and, by his honourable conduct and indus- try, made his fortune, became Lord Provost, and afterwards Master of the Merchant Company. He was extremely popu- lar, and warmly promoted all the improvements of the city. The Company offered to attend his funeral, but this was respectfully declined by the family, as it accorded more with their personal feelings that the funeral should be conducted privately. Merchant Company of Edinburgh. privately. His death raised the novel question of the power of the Company to supply the vacancy of Master of the Com- pany, and Preses of the various hospitals ; but, under the advice of counsel, Mr James Moncrieff and Mr John Hope, the Company lost no time in electing a successor. In August 1827, the Company agreed to take part in another public procession, at the laying of the foundation of the Southern and Western Bridges, on the i5th. The Deputy Lord Lyon made up a programme of the procession of the public bodies, giving a precedence to the Company over the Incorporated Trades. This the Trades disputed. The Company, however, insisted on their rights, and main- tained that the same precedence had been given them at the funerals of Provosts Kincaid and Coulter. The matter was referred to Mr Thomas Thomson, advocate, who decided in favour of the Company. We must now, however, draw towards a conclusion, as we have arrived at a period fresh in the recollection of many of the present Members of the Company j and to give details of recent proceedings would be a work of supererogation. In 1826, the Company, which had for many years before been desirous of establishing a Widows' Fund, finally resolved upon one, and in the following year obtained an A61 of Par- liament to carry out their views. Before, however, alluding particularly to this, and the changes thereby made on the entry-dues, it is proper to advert, and Precedence over Trades Widows' Fund 86 Historical Notes as to the History of Entry Dues and we shall do so very briefly, to the dues payable to the Company from its institution in 1681. By the original Charter, as has been seen [page 10 of Notes'], the entrance-dues were 6 Scots (IQJ.), and six shil- lings Scots (6^.) in quarterly payments while in trade. Ap- prentices to Members paid 3 Scots (5^.) on their entry. The practice of exa&ing apprentice-fees ceased about 1725. For many years prior to 1777, persons without the Patent or Charter that is, persons of professions different from the description in the Charter, but merchants, burgesses, and guild brethren were admitted on payment of higher fees than were exacted from persons 'within the Patent; but from 1681 down to 1777, the entrance fees of Members within the Patent had continued at the original sum of 6 Scots, and 6s. Scots, or 2 sterling, including the purchase of the quarter dues. In 1777, however, the Company obtained a new Charter from King George III. [see Appendix}, authorizing them to exaft 6 sterling, and 6s. sterling, in place of the former fees. After this Charter was obtained the entrance fee exacled from Mem- bers within the Patent was fixed at 10, including the purchase of annual dues, and from those without the Patent, at zo. Soon after obtaining the Aft of 1777, the Company increased rapidly in numbers, particularly of persons without the Patent, or " Non-Patent" Members, as they were called. The accession made to the stock of the Company by the admission of this latter class of Members, between 1783 and 1797, was more than Merchant Company of Edinburgh. than a fourth part of the whole accumulated capital of the Company. In 1798, the Company again resolved to raise the entry dues. Power was accordingly obtained \see Aft in Appendix], and the fees were raised from 6 sterling, and 6s. sterling, to iz sterling of entry-money, and 9*. of an- nual dues; while power was obtained to exaft from every entrant, over and above these fees, i, IQJ. sterling, for each year after the first two he had, at his admission, carried on business. By this Aft, it was declared that, whereas " it hath been the praftice of the said Company to admit as Mem- bers, and to the benefits, rights, and privileges arising there- from, persons who do not exaftly fall within the description of sellers and importers of cloths, stuffs, and other merchandise, for the apparel or wear of the bodies of men or women, but bankers and others who are merchants, burgesses, and guild brethren, or entitled to be chosen merchant-councillors, or magistrates of the city of Edinburgh. And whereas, the funds of the said Company have thereby been much benefited, and the charitable purposes thereby provided for very materially promoted, and it is therefore expedient that the above-mention- ed praftice should, under suitable regulations, be continued;" therefore, the Company are authorized " to admit all persons being merchants, burgesses, and guild brothers, or entitled to be chosen merchant-councillors or magistrates of the city of Edin- burgh, as Members," each person paying, in name of entry- money and as composition for annual dues, such sum, not less than History of Entry Dues 88 Historical Notes as to the History of Entry Dues than 25 sterling, as the said Company shall, in the circum- stances of each particular case, deem adequate and reasonable." Upon the passing of this A61, the Company fixed the fees of entry-money of Patent Members at 18, in which was included 6 as the purchase of the annual dues ; and the fees of entry of Non-Patent Members at 25 sterling; and both descriptions paid 3OJ. more for every year but two they had carried on business at their entrance to the Company. Afterwards, the sum of the annual dues was fixed at 9 (equal to 20 years' purchase), which raised the entrance fees from i 8 to 21, to Patent Members ; and the fees of Non-Patent Members was, at the same time, raised to 4.2; both continuing to pay the 30^. of business tax. The following figures shew how much the Company in- creased in property, under their enlarged powers. Abstract State of Annual Sums received from Entrants since the Aft of Parliament 1798, and down to 1820. Year. Treasurer. Total Sum. 1799 to 1802, __ Mr George White 690 o o 1802101805 -- Mr George Brunton 897 o o 1805101808 .. Mr Robert Kerr ..." 907 o o l8o8toi8n .. Mr Adam Freer _ __ 1017 o o 1811 to 1814 __ Mr Robert Plenderleith 2182 10 o 1814101817 __ Mr William Ph in 2092 10 o 1817101820 .. Mr Thomas Blackwood 3715 10 o As will be seen, when we come to the details of the Widows' Scheme, Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Scheme Aft of 1827, the Company again altered their fees of admission. Before, however, taking up this Aft, we stop for a moment to note the description of a few of the persons who have been admitted Members both before and since the Aft, to shew that the Company has not in praftice been restrifted to merchants in the narrowest sense of the term. Bankers and others, when of high standing in the city of Edinburgh and also in Leith, have been admitted, not a few of whom were and are amongst the most valued and useful Members of the Company. Take, say from 1703, there is, in addition to many ordinary' merchants who were admitted, in July of that year, a writer, burgess, and guild brother 5 in February 1705, a writer, mer- chant, burgess, and guild brother; in May 1709, a writer and burgess j in 1720, a wigmaker and merchant burgess; in Oftober 1721, a writer, merchant, burgess, and guild brother. Many Members admitted resided in Leith, Canongate, and Portsburgh. The Minutes between 1714 and 1725 are missing, and those for twenty years after 1725 afford no information as to the description of persons entered. The following, all burgesses and guild brothers, were sub- sequently admitted : An insurance broker, a shipbuilder, a corn merchant, the clerk to His Majesty's Printer, a seal en- graver, various distillers, a coachmaker, a builder, an agent, a general Persons admitted 9 Historical Notes as to the Widows' Scheme Aft of 1827 general agent, a mail-coach contraftor, a mercantile agent, a newspaper agent, a commission agent, auctioneers and ap- praisers, a contractor, a commercial agent, an accountant, a civil engineer, &c. We now come more particularly to that important and useful feature of the Company, technically intitled, under the A61 of Parliament, " The Widows 1 Scheme of the Company of Merchants of the City of Edinburgh " a Scheme which has, in many instances, been the source of benefit to the families of deceased Members. In the year 1826, the Stock of the Company had increased, by excellent management, to 31,479, 15^. i^/. sterling ; and the Members resolved to institute a Widows' Fund for making a certain provision, as a matter of right and of law, to the widow of every Member of the Company, who chose to be- come a contributor to it, and to the widow of every future Member, who, by his entrance into the Company, would, as a matter of course, become a contributor to the Widows' Fund. The rights of the then Members, not becoming contri- butors to this Fund, to remain untouched ; while a sufficient Fund was to be reserved for a provision to decayed Members, and to their widows, in all time coming. In the following year, an A61 of Parliament was applied for and obtained, for carrying this scheme into effect, and by which powers were conferred on the Company to levy the sum of 63 sterling, from individuals of every description entering with Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 9 l with the Company in future, of which sum 42 were allotted to the Widows' Fund, and the remaining 2 1 to the common Stock of the Company, and also to levy 3, 3/. from new entrants, for every year they should be in business after two years, before becoming Members of the Company. This payment is now changed, by a subsequent regulation of the Company, into an Age-tax of twenty-one shillings for each year the age of a new Member exceeds thirty at the period of his joining the Company. Powers were also conferred on the Company to pay over to the Widows' Fund 30 out of the common Stock of the Company for each Member of the Company, at the date of the Aft, who became a contributor to the Widows' Fund, such contributor's widow to have no claim afterwards on the com- mon fund of the Company $ and powers were likewise given to levy 10, IQJ. annually for six years from the then present and future contributors to the Widows' Fund, and also certain Marriage-taxes, according to the age of the parties, with liberty to each contributor to purchase his annual payments for the sum of 50, if such purchase be made on or before the second annual payment of the 10, IQJ. Of the then Members of the Company, 276 became contri- butors to this Fund. At the end of the seventh year of the Fund, the stock of the contributors amounted to the sum of 20,949, u. iod. It is now about 56,000. We may note here the entire moneys exigible under this Aft Historical Notes as to the Entry Money Application of Funds Aft, from Members of the Company and contributors to the Widows' Scheme, and mention a few of the many advan- tages, which flow from Membership. Then, with a few remarks on various general matters connected with the Com- pany, and with a brief reference to the Hospitals, and to the large funds under the charge of the Master, Assistants, and Governors, these Notes will be brought to a close. THE MERCHANT COMPANY. The entry money payable by Members on their admission to the Company (exclusive of Age-tax, if any, and certain tri- fling fees), is now, as shewn, only twenty guineas. This sum, small as it is, proves, as has been seen, amply sufficient for the present purposes of the Incorporation. The twenty guineas are thus applied, in terms of the Aft of Parliament : 1. For the good and utility of the Company. 2. In payment of such allowances or annuities as may be granted to the Members of the Company who are or may fall into indigent and decayed circumstances. 3. In payment of such allowances or annuities as may be granted to the indigent widows of the Members who have died, or of Members in existence at the date of the Act of Parliament, 1827, who may die without Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 93 without becoming contributors to the Widows' Fund. [All Members after 1827 must be contributors to the Widows' Fund.] 4. In payment of the expense of management of the General Fund of the Company } and 5. To any other purposes to which the said Fund may be lawfully applied in terms of the Charters and Afts of Parliament, and according to the lawful usages of the Company. If a Member exceeds the age of 30 years, it becomes necessary to exact, in addition to the 21, an equalizing Age-tax of 1, is. (i.e., interest at five per cent, on 21), for each year he exceeds 30. The reasonableness of this tax is very obvious. Without it the following anomaly might any day occur : a person entering at 60 years of age, and for payment of 21, might have grand-children, and perhaps children not past twelve years of age. Immediately on his thus becoming a Member, his children and grand- children would obtain a preferable right to admission into the Hospitals ; and in a very few years he himself would, if he required it, become entitled to the pension allowed to decayed Members. It is to obviate such an occurrence as this, that the Age-tax is exacted. A few of the advantages of joining the Merchant Company may be thus briefly stated : I. The Member's children and grand-children have a preferable right of admission into George Watson's Hospital, and a right to the Merchant Maiden Hospital ; and in the other Hospitals various mortifi- cations enable the Company to hold out additional advantages. 2. These Age Tax Advantages of Membership Historical Notes as to the 2. These privileges are of the greatest importance. Many of the children are entitled to them as their birthright the result of their parents or grand-parents having been Members of the Merchant Com- pany, and having otherwise occupied a respectable position ; while education in these Hospitals is, as a general rule, an evidence of respect- able parentage. 3. A pleasing feature connected with these institutions is, the warm and affectionate interest taken by the Governors in the children under their charge. The advice given to the boys and the girls on their de- parture from these institutions, to fight the battle of life, is " If you find yourselves in difficulties come to us." And that these are not empty words, those connected with the Hospitals know well. 4. Another great advantage is that Members falling into poverty (and who may not?) receive liberal allowances. 5. Members join the Widows' Fund, and thereby secure a comfort- able annuity to their widows. 6. The Company, even exclusive of the Widows' Fund, for this small sum of twenty guineas, is thus, as has been truly said, a safe- guard for Merchants and their families against the vicissitudes of a mercantile life. 7. Membership in the most influential Company in the city, which, taking, as it does, an important part in great public questions, affecting trade and commerce and the taxes of the people, affords to each Mem- ber a channel for bringing his views before the public, and, indirectly, the legislature, through the medium of the Company. 8. The prospect of becoming a director of the Company and of the various charitable institutions under its charge. We Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 95 We shall now refer to the contributions to, and the benefits derivable by, Members from THE WIDOWS' SCHEME. Every Member of the Company, as already stated, must now join the Widows' Scheme. The entry money is 92, but 50 of it, and the interest, may be paid in twelve half-yearly payments of five guineas each. The advantages of the Fund are considerable : 1. For this comparatively small sum the Member's widow draws, as a legal right, and not as a gift, an annuity, at present of 25, but which will probably ere long be increased. 2. The capital stock of the Widows' Scheme is so large, and the guarantee of its security so good, that it is perfectly secure. 3. Should the widow again marry, the annuity continues, but is not subject to the second husband's debts or control. It is a certain means of livelihood for her. 4. Two great additional advantages of this Fund are, that (i), it is almost absolutely free from that heavy burden on other insurance funds, viz., expenses of management } and (2), that there are no further payments of any kind. On much the same principle as that stated in regard to the Age-tax, it becomes necessary, if a new Member of the Scheme is, on his admission, married, or if not, when he does marry, to exa6l from him a Marriage-tax of 2, io/. for each complete year, after the first five, the age of the Member exceeds that of his wife. If, however, he marries the widow of a former Mem- ber^of the Scheme, he is exempted from this tax altogether, un- less, Widows' Scheme Marriage Tax 9 6 Historical Notes as to the less, of course, on her death he should marry another person, not a contributor's widow. For the purpose of illustration, we give a few more figures: Total Entry ist Illustration shewing Entry Money by a Member aged 30, or under, and unmarried : To the Company 21 o o To the Widows' Fund 92 o o OtherFees i II 6 114 " 6* ind Illustration. When a Member is 32 years of age, is married to other than a contributor's widow, and his wife is six years younger than himself: To the Company 21 o o Do. Age-tax a a o *3 * o To the Widows' Fund 92 o o Do. Marriage-tax a 10 o 94 10 o 117 12 o Other Fees _ I 1 1 6 "9 3 6 Illustration shewing the Entry Money at any age : Add to the above 119, 3*. 67^4 ii M&iden Hospital 127,605 12 Watson's Hospital __ 177,306 9 Stewart's Hospital __ 122,504 19 13 3,33 6 17 5>5 2 9 6 Gillespie's Hospital __ 49,032 19 10 6,495 3,4' 6 ii 17 3 ,7ii 15 3 Total, 557,495 * ro 21,864 16 ii Thus have the charities of the Company, from an humble beginning, attained a most distinguished eminence, and sown broadcast their many benefits ; whilst the funds have been accumulated by the zeal and wisdom of the successive Masters, Assistants, and Governors, without any of them having accepted * Inigo Jones (born 1572, died 1653) is the refuted architect; but there exists no documentary evidence to prove this. See Steven's History of Heriofs Hospital. New Edition by Dr Bedford, pp. 46, 190. Merchant Company of Edinburgh. 127 accepted one shilling, either in its more detailed or general management ; all of which have been conduced by them- selves, from an enlightened public and charitable spirit. Nor have they scrupled to devote a great amount of valuable time to these duties, notwithstanding that most of them have been conducing, at the same time, the largest businesses in the City. We conclude these Notes in the words of one of the most energetic of our former Masters, who when referring to the great amount of property under the charge of the Company, elo- quently and truthfully exclaimed " truly a magnificent sum, held for most noble objects, to shelter the orphan relieve the widow comfort the distressed educate the young and pour the balm of consolation into the cup of the aged and infirm. Let us, then, (he said,) invite every mercantile man to join in upholding this most antient and honourable Corporation, and aid in the work which kind, benevolent, and Christian men have committed to our care" 128 Merchant Campar.y of Edinburgh. NAMES OF ADDITIONAL MEMBERS. Since the Appendix to these Notes was printed off, the following gentlemen, being the last six of the twenty-eight who applied for admission during 1862, have been enrolled as Members : Anderson, Walter __ Sept. 1862 Harper, John Sept. 1862 Purdie, John Sept. 1862 Livingston, James Sept. 1862 Robertson, Robert Sept. 1862 Robertson, George Sept. 1862 APPENDIX. APPENDIX. No. I. Alphabetical List of the Members of the Merchant Company of Edinburgh. Note. Owing to the manner in which the first Records of the Company were kept, a few of the early Names are perhaps omitted in this List; but if so, they will be found o'i reference to the copies of the two first pages of the Record, at pages 13 and 14. Abernethy, Thomas __ Adam, James Adam, Robert Adie, Alexander James Aikman, Archibald __ Aikman, George Ainslie, James Ainslie, James Ainslie, William Ainslie, William Airth, Alexander Aitchison, George Aitchison, James Aitchison, John Aitchison, John Aitchison, William __ Aitchison, William, jun Aitken, Alexander _. Aitken, Andrew Aitken, John Aitken, John Aitken, John, jun.__ Mar. 1819 June 1713 Mar. 1826 Sept. 1816 Mar. 1836 June 1798 Feb. 1682 May 1814 Mar. 1783 May 1814 June 1835 Mar. 1 840 Nov. 1818 Dec. 1782 May 1844 May 1783 .Mar. 1814 Mar. 1836 Jan. 1687 Oct. 1691 July 1801 Mar. 1703 Aitken, Samuel Alexander, Frederick Alexander, John Alexander, John Alexander, Richard Alexander, William __ Alison, Alexander __ Alison, Andrew Allan, Alexander Allan, David Allan, James Allan, James Allan, John Allan, Nichol Allan, Robert Allan, Thomas Allan, Thomas Allan, William Allan, William Allen, James Allison, George Ancrum, Michael Dec. 1817 Oct. 1850 Dec. 1819 Oct. 1850 July 1816 Jan. 1762 Dec. 1790 June 1749 Jan. 1776 July 1804 Oct. 1724 July 1803 Aug. 1754 Mar. 1807 Dec. 1787 Dec. 1790 Oct. 1820 Dec. 1782 Oct. 1799 Jan. 1688 Mar. 1691 Jan. 1762 List of Members ii Appendix* List of Members Anderson, Alexander July 1773 Anderson, Alexander Nov. 1797 Anderson, Archibald Jan. 1783 Anderson, Archibald Nov. 1797 Anderson, Charles __ Jan 1801 Anderson, David Sept. 1815 Anderson, David Nov. 1818 Anderson, George... _ Jan. 1790 Anderson, James June 1725 Anderson, ames Jan. 1761 Anderson, ames Oct. 1811 Anderson, James Feb. 1851 Anderson, John Aug. 1707 Anderson, John Nov. 1790 Anderson, John Mar. 1805 Anderson, John June 1812 Anderson, John, jun. Mar. 1826 Anderson, John Oct. 1837 Arrol, Thomas J u ty '797 Auchenleck, George May 1709 Auld, John -Aug. 1682 Auld, John Jan. 1688 Baiker, Thomas July 1797 Bailey, John _ Aug. 1694 Baillie, George Sept, 1712 Baillie, James Aug. 1745 Baillie, James, jun. __ Aug. 1745 Baillie, John April 1858 Baillie, William Feb. 1736 Bain, James Sept. 1729 Baird, Alexander Dec. 1695 Baird, Henry Nov. 1690 Baird, James Sept. 1732 Baird, James _ Dec. 1806 Baird, John Dec. 1821 Anderson, John Oct. 1855 Anderson, Peter July 1797 Anderson, Robert Sept. 1747 Anderson, Robert Oct. 1795 Anderson, Robert July 1797 Anderson, Robert Oct. 1812 Anderson, Robert Nov. 1831 Anderson Samuel Oct. 1788 Balfour, James Dec. 1691 Bal four, John Sept. 1731 Balfour, John, jun. __ Nov. 1798 Ballantine, James Mar. 1807 Ballantine, ames Mar. 1859 Ballantyne, James Feb. 1703 Ballantyne, James __ Oct. 1811 Balmain, John April 1813 Anderson, William __ Nov. 1690 Anderson, William __ Nov. 1790 Andrew, John Dec. 1786 Bancks Charles James Nov. 1825 Bannatine, Richard __ Mar. 1796 Baptie, Patrick J an - 1710 Angus, Archibald Sept. 1734 Angus, John Oct. 1724 Barclay, George Aug. 1861 Barclay, Robert Feb. 1736 Barclay, William Jan. 1765 Barr, Allan Sept. 1796 Angus Robert Sept. 1731 Arbuthnot, Robert __ Oct. 1746 Arbuthnot, Robert April 1779 Arbuthnot, William __ May 1814 Archibald John Nov. 1782 Baxter, Charles Feb. 1793 Bayne, Robert J u ty 1803 Beatson, Andrew Jan. 1766 Beattie, Adam J une 1850 Armstrong, Andrew.. Jan. 1790 Armstrong, Fergus Oct. 1829 Armstrong, Francis __ Oct. 1767 Beattie, George _ Oct. 1 842 Beattie, William Dec. 1693 Beattie, William July 1840 Beg, Allan Jan 1731 Armstrong, Robert Nov. 1809 Armour, John Feb. 1782 Beg, George _ _ J an - 1684 Begbie, William Mar. 1787 Appendix. iii Beeg, John Mar. 1691 Blyth, Benjamin Hall Aug. 1857 Blyth, Edward Law- rence Ireland Aug. 1857 Blyth, Howard Aug. 1857 List of Members Reich, George _ Aug. 1708 Bell, Alexander Sept. 1772 Bell, Andrew Aug. 1725 Bell, Andrew Nov. 1810 Blyth, James Sept. 1815 Bell, James June 1725 Bell, James J u ty '803 Blyth, Robert Brittain Mar. 1819 Boak, Duncan May 1728 Bogle, Andrew.. Sept. 1817 Bell, Peter Mar. 1840 Bell, William Aug. 1711 Bogle, Robert Sept. 1710 Bernard, James Alex. April 1857 Bertram, Gilbert Jan. 1759 Bertram, Gilbert July 1797 Bertram, John Archd. July 1797 Berwick, William Sept. 1825 Bett, David Mar 1814 Boig, Adam Sept. 1691 Bonar, Alexander Oct. 1788 Bonar, Andrew Oct. 1746 Bonar, Andrew Oct. 1788 Bonar, John Nov. 1818 Beveridge, Alex. June 1862 Beveridge, James June 1742 Beverty, Alexander __ Oct. 1782 Biggar, John Jan. 1766 Bonar, Thomas Feb. 1793 Bonar, William Nov. 1818 Bonthrone, Alexander Mar. 1805 Bortherston, George-- April 1700 Borthwick, Alexander Feb. 1777 Borthwick, Archibald July 1791 Borthwick, James Nov. 1818 Borthwick, Patrick Nov. 1818 Bow, Robert _ Dec. 1782 Biggar, Robert, jun.__ Dec. 1787 Bisgar, Robert May 1789 Biggar, Walter J an - 1766 Binning, John Tan. 1688 Binning, John Aug. 1692 Bishop, James - Oct. 1799 Bowe David Oct. 1833 Black, Adam May 1814 Bowe Tames Aug i8c8 Black, Andrew J un e 1706 Bowe, Thomas April 1834 Black, John Feb. 1752 Bowe, William _ Dec. 1833 Blackadder, James __ Nov. 1841 Black, William April 1848 Blackwood, John July 1804 Blackwood, Thomas__ July 1804 Blackwood, William__ Nov. 1818 Blackwood, William Aug. 1852 Bowie, Archibald Aug. 1745 Bowie, John Dec. 1814 Bowie, Patrick _ Aug. 1745 Boyd, George J an - 175^ Boyd, John May 1860 Boyd, Thos. Jamieson Jan. 1860 Braidwood, William__ Nov. 1790 Braid wood, William Aug. 1807 Brand, John ___ Sept. 1731 Blaikie, Thomas Sept. 1817 Blair, Charles __ __ April 1848 Blair, Francis __ Feb. 1777 Break, James Dec. 1802 Blair, John Mar 1763 Bremner, William Feb. 1851 Bridges, David __ Aug. 1775 Blair, Robert Jan. 1846 Blane, James la Jan. 1700 Blance, Louis Sept. 1725 Bridges, David, jun.__ May 1814 Bridges, John ______ Sept. 1732 Blanshard, George ._ July 1858 Brodie, James __ Nov. 1790 IV Appendix. List of Members Brodie, James July 1844 Brunton, William Dec. 1817 Bryce, David Dec. 1787 Brodie, Francis Mar. 1694 Brook, Adam J<*n* '7^4 Bryce, James Jan 1832 Brooks, Adam, jun.__ May 1810 Brooks, John Aug. 1806 Brymer, John Aug. 1701 Brymers, Alexander __ Oct. 1739 Brymers, James Oct. 1739 Bryson, Alexander __ June 1713 Bryson, George Aug. 1692 Brotherstones, James Oct. 1716 Brown, Adam Feb. 1694 Brown, Alexander __ May 1688 Brown, Alexander __ June 1742 Brown, Alexander,jun. Jan. 1762 Brown, Alexander __ Feb. 1784 Brown, Alexander __ Nov. 1797 Brown, Andrew July 1684 Brown, David Sept. 1727 Bryson, John _ Aug. 1725 Bryson, Robert Mar. 1715 Bryson, Robert Nov. 1857 Buchan, Francis Oct. 1788 Buchan, William Nov. 1790 Buchanan, Patrick __ Sept. 1712 Bullo, William __ __ Aug. 1698 Brown, George. Mar. 1685 Brown, George Dec. 1696 Bunkell, Edward Sept. 1725 Burges, James Oct. 1814 Brown, George Mar. 1826 Brown, James Aug. 1686 Burn, James Feb. 17-82 Brown, James Oct. 1782 Burns, George _ Oct. 1 842 Brown, James _- J u ty ^79* Burns, James April 1701 Brown, John May 1690 Burns, Robert Sept. 1816 Brown, John May 1692 Burr, Alexander Feb. 1821 Burt, Robert, Nov. 1806 Brown, John Dec. 1755 Brown, Matthew Aug. 1745 Brown, Peter May 1810 Burton, James J une 1711 Butler, Charles Aug. 1746 Brown, Robert June 1802 Butler, John Oct. 1782 Brown, Robert Mar. 1 826 Cadell, Robert May 1816 Brown, Thomas Nov. 1790 Brown, William June 1749 Brown, Walter Nov. 1797 Cadell, William July 1791 Cadill, Philip __ _ May 1816 Brown, William Jan. 1698 Brown, William Henry July 1813 Browning, Matthew.. Dec. 1820 Bruce, Alexander Nov. 1797 Bruce, George Nov. 1767 Caithness, Edward __ Aug. 1740 Calder, Peter Nov. 1797 Calder, Thomas June 1829 Calder, William July 1797 Caldwell, Robert June 1839 Caldwell, Thomas June 1701 Callam, George Dec. 1811 Callender, David, Nov. 1836 Bruce, James Oct. 1804 Bruce, John Sept. 1712 Bruce, Robert Dec 1852 Bruce, William Jan. 1776 Callender, James Feb. 1753 Callender, William __ Aug. 1754 Cameron, John Nov. 1801 Cameron, Peter Aug. 1858 Campbell, Alexander Oct. 1830 Brugh, Thomas Mar. 1711 Brunton, George July 1791 Brunton, John Dec. i 770 Appendix. V Campbell, Archibald __ Sept. 1735 Campbell, Archibald __ Aug. 1746 Campbell, Archibald.. Sept. 1796 Campbell, Colin Jan. 1699 Campbell, Gilbert __ Mar. 1695 Campbell, James Sept. 1796 Campbell, John Jan. 17-5 Campbell, John Oct. 1707 Campbell, Thomas _. Nov. 1774 Campbell, Thomas B. Oct. 1845 Carfrae, Tames April 1775 Christie, William Nov. 1844 Clapperton, Alexander May 1810 Clapperton, John Oct. 1773 Clapperton, John July 1851 Clapperton, Thomas. _ June 1812 Clapperton, William __ Feb. 1752 Clark, David _ Jan. 1789 List of Members Clark, Robert Sept 1736 Clark, Robert __ __ Nov. 1851 Cleghorn, Adam J u e I 74 2 Cleghorn, Thomas __ June 1748 Cleghorn, Thomas Sept. 1796 Cleghorn, William __ Oct. 1691 Cleland, Alexander Jan. 1696 Cleland, James Feb. 1697 Carfrae, John __ Mar. 1819 Carfrae, William Jan. 1688 Carfrae, William July 1773 Carmichael, Andrew Aug. 1692 Carmichael, Thomas.. Sept. 1772 Carmichael, William April 1683 Carmichael, William __ Jan. 1712 Carnegie, Johnston __ Dec. 1836 Carnegie, William __ Aug. 1705 Cars, William __ Aug. 1720 Cleland, John _ Aug. 1692 Cleland, John T u ly I 74^ Cleland, William Aug. 1807 Clelland John Sept. 1690 Clelland, Robert Aug. 1731 Clerk, George Aug. 1 704 Carse, John May. 1698 Clerk, John Aug. 1754 Cassels, Andrew Dec. 1790 Cattanach, William Oct. 1832 Cleugh, Robert Feb. 1736 Cleyne, John Dec. iScy Chadwick, James Dec. 1814 Chalmers, Alexander Dec. 1725 Chalmers, George __ Aug. 1746 Chalmers, John Nov. 1759 Chalmers, Patrick __ Sept. 1690 Chalmers, William __ Jan. 1703 Chambers, Robert __ Dec. 1848 Charles, James Nov. 1790 Cochrane, James Sept, 1794 Cochrane, William __ Aug. 1745 Cochrane, William __ Mar. 1814 Cockburn, Archibald Nov. 1683 Cockburn, Archibald Feb. 1694 Cockburn, George Jan. 1699 Cockburn, Robert __ May 1814 Collier, James __ Dec. 1786 Charles, John Nov. 1818 Collin, Lucas Oct. 1814 Charteris, Henry Oct. 1704 Chessley, William __ Sept. 1686 Cheyne, Charles J un e 1742 Cheyne,NinionRichard June 1798 Child, William.. Oct. 1806 Colquhoun, Adam __ June 1812 Colquhoun, John Feb. 1682 Colvill, Thomas Sept. 1736 Congalton, Alexander Dec. 1706 Connel, Tames Oct 1799 Chisholm, John Knox Feb. 1853 Chisholm, Robert __ Nov. 1850 Christie, John Mar. 1826 Constable, Archibald July 1804 Cooper, William Oct. 1799 Christie, John Dec. 1848 Corsbie, John May 1688 Christie, William __ July 1813 Coulter, William Feb. 1782 vi Appendix. List of Members Cotton, William Dec. 1852 Coventry, John July 1699 Cowan, Alexander __ Jan. 1813 Cowan, Charles May 1783 Cowan, Charles, jun. Nov. 1790 Cowan, Charles Oct. 1847 Cowan, Duncan J u 'y I 79 I Cowan, James Nov. 1845 Cuming, Patrick Sept. 1732 Cuming, William Sept. 1706 Cuming, William, jun. July 1739 Cundell, William Nov. 1790 Cuningham, John __ July 1710 Cuningham, Robert .. Jan. 1685 Cuninghame, Robert May 1710 Cunningham, David.- Mar. 1826 Cunningham, Thomas June 1711 Cunningham, Thomas Mar. 1826 Cunninghame, James Sept. 1794 Currie, David May 1844 Cowan, John April 1858 Cowan, William April 1775 Cowan, William Dec. 1848 Grabble, John Jan. 1857 Crabbie, John M. J un c 1862 Currie, James Oct. 1739 Grabble, Muller April 1825 Craig, Alexander Aug. 1691 Craig, Alexander July 1804 Craig, Archibald Aug. 1847 Craig, Archibald Aug. 1857 Craig, Hugh - Sept. 1688 Dallas Alexander J urj e 1749 Dallas, James Sept. 1817 Dallas, John June 1824 Dallas, Thomas Jan. 1798 Dallas, Walter J u ty *7'9 Craig, James Feb. 1848 Dalrymple, James __ Aug. 1720 Dalrymple, John Dec. 1755 Dalrymple, William __ Dec. 1776 Davidson, George Nov. 1691 Davidson, John May 1691 Davidson, Thomas __ April 1695 Davidson, William __ Sept. 1687 Davidson, William __ Mar. 1831 Dawson, William Nov. 1769 Dawson, William July 1791 Deuchar, Alexander.. Mar. 1819 Deuchar, Alex., jun. Nov. 1809 Dewar, George _ April 177 5 Craig, John Dec. 1817 Craig, John Nov. 1825 Craig, John Dec. 1825 Craig, William Nov. 1857 Crawford, Maurice __ Dec. 1802 Crawford, Patrick __ Mar. 1685 Crawford, Robert Feb. 1697 Crease, William July 1804 Cree, James Oct. 1857 Creech, William Oct. 1788 Crerar, John Sept. 1825 Crichton, Alexander Mar. 1787 Crichton, George Nov. 1818 Crichton, Patrick Nov. 1795 Crokat, John Dec. 1790 Dewar, James Nov. 1769 Dick, John Dec. 1783 Dick, John May 1844 Crokat, Patrick Nov. 1724 Crombie, Francis Oct. 1795 Crombie, William __ Nov. 1796 Crooks, William May 1709 Crosbie, James _ Oct. 1684 Dick, Thomas __ Sept. 1824 Dick, William _ Sept. 1764 Dickson, David Oct, 1847 Dickson, James Nov. 1690 Dickson, James May 1814 Dickson, James _ Oct. 1844 Crouch, William Dec. 1838 Crystie, James J u ^y 1 797 Dickson, John May. 1706 Cudbert, Robert Aug. 1693 Dickson, William Oct. 1847 Appendix. vii Dickson, William .. Aug. 1858 Din, John _ Oct. 1721 Duncan, Thomas J u ty 1801 Duncan, William Sept. 1825 Dundas, Thomas, jun. Feb. 1736 Dundas, William Mar. 1704 Duning Matthew July 1734 Dunlop, Archibald __ Dec. 1817 Dunlop, George June 1798 Dunlop, William July 1810 Dunnet, Andrew Oct. 1697 Dunsmure, John Aug. 1740 Dunsmure, George __ Jan. 1751 Easton, John April 1811 List of Members DoSg, Frederick Oct. 1812 Don, John Jan. 1731 Donaldson, Colin Nov. 1823 Donaldson, James __ May 1691 Donaldson, James ]u\y 1724 Donaldson, James July 1734 Dott, Aitken May 1860 Douglas, Archibald __ July 1748 Douglas, James April 1832 Douglas, Robert April 1691 Douglas, William Feb. 1736 Douglas, William Nov. 1796 Edgar, Andrew Feb, 1697 Dow, James Jan. 1680 Edgar, James __ J an - I77 Dowall, Arthur Mar. 1695 Dowell, Alexander __ June 1861 Dowell, James Jan, 1850 Edington, John Nov. 1823 Edington, Thomas __ Nov, 1790 Edmondstone, James Jan. 1689 Edmonston, Thomas Sept. 1815 Elder, John .. _ Feb. 1682 Dowie, William Feb. 1716 Drummond, James __ Mar. 1822 Dryburgh, John Oct. 1849 Elder, Thomas Tan 1769 Dryburgh, Thomas __ Aug. 1858 Drysdale, William __ Jan. 1850 Drysdell, Robert J an 1684 Elliot, Charles Dec. 1787 Elliot, William Feb. 1697 Ellis, Martin Nov 1790 Dudgeon, John Dec. 1790 Dudgeon, William __ Nov. 1818 Dun, William Sept. 1747 Elsplin, John Aug 1740 English, John __ Aug. 1730 Erskine, Charles Aug. 1685 Esdale, John Tan 170? Dunbar, George J an - 1721 Dunbar, Hutchison June 1805 Dunbar, Thomas J an - J ^93 Dunbar, William Dec. 1691 Duncan, Andrew Sept. 1843 Duncan, Archibald .. Dec. 1683 Duncan, George Mar. 1814 Duncan, Henry April 1783 Duncan, Tames May 1814 Ewan, William _ Dec. 1808 Ewart, Adam Sept. 1735 Ewing,' William Jan. 1711 Fairbairn, John Feb. 1817 Fairbairn, Thomas __ Sept. 1821 Fairholm, Adam Sept. 1747 Duncan, Jas. Sandilands April 1848 Duncan, John June 1691 Falkner, Robert Sept. 1817 Falshaw, James Nov. 1861 Farquhar, James Aug 1740 Duncan, John Nov. 1691 Duncan, John Dec. 1698 Farquharson, Chas. H. Nov. 1846 Farquharson, Henry __ Dec. 1786 Farnoles, William Aug. 1710 Duncan, John Oct. 1724 Duncan, John _ Nov. 1822 Duncan, Mark Sept. 1794 viii Appendix. List of Members Fenwick, George Oct. 1690 Fergus, Robert Jan. 1688 Forrest, Walter Mar. 1763 Jan. 1790 April 1820 July 1695 Oct. 1779 Nov. 1782 Dec. 1790 Aug. 1713 Nov. 1823 Sept. 1850 April 1858 Aug. 1731 Sept. 1794 Sept. 1794 Dec. 1827 Mar. 1844 Aug. 1709 Oct. 1779 Mar. 1787 Sept. 1817 Mar. 1813 July 1682 Feb. 1685 June 1862 Aug. 1745 Jan. 1766 July 1773 Jan. 1766 Dec. 1790 Dec. 1790 Nov. 1823 Oct. 1808 Aug. 1705 Dec. 1777 Nov. 1759 Oct. 1806 May 1777 Jan. 1762 Aug. 1725 July 1734 Mar. 1704 Nov. 1769 Forrest, William Forrest, William Forrester, John Ferguson Oct. 1767 Ferguson, Alexander May 1842 Ferguson, Archibald Dec. 1852 Ferguson, David July 1736 Ferguson, John Sept. 1708 Forrester, Peter Forrester, Robert Forrester, William __ Fowler, James __ Ferguson, William Aug. 1807 Fergusson, Alexander Jan. 1684 Ferrier, William Nov. 1691 Fettes, William _ Nov. 1776 Fowler, William Foyer, John Fraser, Alexander Fraser, Charles Fettes, William Nov. 1782 Field, William Sept. 1796 Fraser, Charles Fife, Alexander Jan- 1825 Finlay, Alexander Jan. 1713 Finlayson, George June 1794 Fish, John _ June 1748 Fraser, George _ Fraser, Peter Scott __ Fraser, William Fraser, William Freebairn, David Freer, Adam Fisher, Charles Tan. 1709 Fleming, James Aug. 1682 Fleming, Robert Oct. 1684 Fleming, Robert J une 1749 Fleming, Robert Dec. 1820 Fleming, Thomas Dec. 1704 Flockhart, William __ April 1857 Foggo, Samuel Jan. 1762 Foggo, Thomas Jan. 1761 Forbes, Alex., senr. Dec. 1691 Forbes, George Nov. 1818 French, James Frier John Frogg, Alexander Fullarton, William __ Fulton, Andrew Fyfe, James Fyfe, James Fyfe, James, jun. Fyfe, John Forbes, Patrick Jan. 1685 Fyffe, Barclay Forbes, Peter May 1816 Fyffe, Richard .- Forbes, Sir Wm., Bart. Jan. 1776 Forbes, William July 1801 Ford, James _ Aug. 1858 Gall, James Galloway, Alexander Galloway, James Galloway, John Galloway, William __ Galloway, William _. Gairdner, Ebenezer __ Gairdner, James Gairdner, James Gairdner, Thomas Gardner, Andrew Gardner, John Ford, John H. June 1862 Ford, William _._ Dec. 1808 Forrest, Daniel Feb. 1793 Forrest, Daniel, jun.__ Mar. 1819 Forrest, David Jan. 1687 Forrest, James May 1789 Forrest, John Feb. 1704 Forrest, John, jun. __ Oct. 1767 Forrest, John Oct. 1795 Forrest, John Richard Dec. 1848 Appendix. ix Nov. 1816 Oct. 1850 Aug. 1682 Sept. 1825 Feb. 1697 Nov. 1790 Jan. 1688 Feb. 1682 Sept. 1720 Nov. 1839 Oct. 1776 May 1814 Mar. 1819 Dec. 1823 June 1798 June 1824 Aug. 1807 May 1814 Mar. 1695 Nov. 1819 April 1701 Nov. 1816 April 1833 Oct. 1777 Dec. 1786 Aug. 1858 May 1814 Nov. 1849 Jan. 1770 Oct. 1788 Sept. 1816 Oct. 1814 Dec. 1806 Dec. 1708 Nov. 1796 Nov. 1769 Dec. 1790 Mar. 1844 June 1812 Aug. 1806 Nov. 1790 Dec. 1692 Feb. 1684 Gleig, John Aug. 1692 Aug. 1816 Mar. 1826 Oct. 1836 Mar. 1826 Dec. 1790 Dec. 1755 July 1797 May 1688 Jan. 1684 Oct. 1706 Jan. 1765 Aug 1818 Mar. 1790 Oct. 1771 Aug. 1858 Feb. 1782 Aug. 1725 Aug. 1711 Jan. 1708 Aug. 1692 April 1827 Sept. l82r Sept. 1718 Sept. 1713 Nov. 1703 Feb. 1701 Oct. 1779 April 1700 June 1862 Oct. 1767 Feb. 1684 Mar. 1706 Sept. 1732 Jan. 1769 Aug. 1710 Aug. 1829 Jan. 1854 April 1813 Jan. 1683 Sept. 1785 Jan. 1860 June 1691 List of Members Garvie, Andrew Gaudie, John Glen, Archibald Glen, Archibald, jun. Glen, John Gavin, Hector Ged, William Glen, William Geddes, Archibald Geills, Robert Glenn, John Gloag, John Gellatly, Robert Gloag, John Gellatly, William Gibb, Fulton Glover, William Goldie, J. Gibb, John Goldie, Robert Gibb, William Goodsman, Tames Gibb, William Gordon, Andrew __i_ Gordon, John Gibb, William Gibson, Archibald __ Gibson, David Gordon, Lewis Gordon, Robert Gourlay, Robert Gow, James ___ Gibson, George Gibson, George, jun. Gibson, John Gowdie John Gibson, John Graeme, Patrick Graham, F. S. Gibson, Patrick Gibson, Robert _ Graham, James Graham, R. MurJoch Graham, William Grant, David Gibson, Robert- Gibson, William Gibson, William Gibson, W. Walker.. Giffbrd, Tames Grant, James Grant, John Gifford, John Grant, .Lewis Gilchrist, Archibald __ Gilchrist, Archibald.. Gilchrist, Edward Gilchrist, James Gilchrist, J. Borthwick Gilchrist, Wal'er Grant, Robert Gray, Alexander Gray, Andrew Gray, Charles Gray, David Gray, George Gilchrist, William __ Gillespie, William __ Gilmer, Samuel Gilmore, William Girdwood, William __ Gladstone, Hugh Gladstone, Thomas Grny, Hugh Gray, James Gray, James Gray, James, jun Gray, James Hall Gray, John _ _ Gray, John Glassell, Thomas Gledstanes, William __ Gray, Mordaunt Gray, Robert __ X Appendix. List of Members Gray, Robert J une 1691 Hamilton, Allan May 1688 Gray, William Dec. 1810 Hamilton, Archibald Jan. 1685 Hamilton, Archibald Aug. 1745 Hamilton, David Feb. 1777 Hamilton, Gavin May 1723 Hamilton, George Aug. 1721 Greig, Andrew Sept. 1852 Greig, Benjamin Nov. 1825 Greig, John Nov. 1795 Greig, John J U ^Y 1804 Greig, John May 1816 Hamilton, Hugh Nov. 1746 Hamilton, James Nov. 1690 (jreig, Thomas Sept. 1815 Green, Charles _ Nov. 1814 Hamilton, James Aug. 1714 Hamilton, Robert July 1709 Hamilton, Robert Aug. 1720 Hamilton, Robert May 1816 Hamilton, Thomas Dec. 1690 Greenlees, Robert Oct. 1746 Grierson, Gilbert Nov. 1790 Grierson, Robert Jan. 1688 Grieve, John Sept. 1747 Grieve, John Nov. 1795 Hamilton, Thomas __ Jan. 1825 Hamilton, Walter __ Feb. 1753 Hamilton, William __ Sept. 1721 Hamilton, William __ Oct. 1842 Hammon, Anthony __ Nov. 1816 Harrison, George Nov. 1856 Harris, Robert Sept. 1718 Grieve, Robert Mar. 1819 Grieve, R. Symington Oct. 1845 Grieve, William April 1858 Griffith, William Aug. 1807 Grindlay, George Dec. 1782 Grindlay, John Nov. 1814 Grindley, George Mar. 1796 Grubb, John Stuart _. Feb. 1856 Gullan, John Nov. 1799 Harris, Thomas July 1797 Hart, James Jan. 1688 Hathorn, Heugh Oct. 1706 Hathorn, William __ Jan. 1712 Hawser, William __ Feb. 1682 Gulland, James _ Feb. 1860 Gulland, John June i86z Hackston, William __ July 1683 Hadaway, Patrick Dec. 1790 Hadding, George May 1691 Haden James Mar. 1703 Hay, Adam _____ Nov. 1818 Hay, Charles April 1700 Hay, John Dec. 1787 Hay, Lewis _ __ _ Dec. 1790 Hay, Thomas April 1700 Haig, Alexander Nov. 1818 Haig, James, jun. Nov. 1818 Haliburton, George __ Dec. 1725 Haliburton, Gilbert __ Aug. 1732 Haliburton, John Oct. 1739 Haliburton, John Aug. 1740 Halliday, John Oct. 1691 Hay, Thomas _ Nov. 1825 Hedderwick, Patrick Aug. 1714 Heill, James May 1810 Henderson, Alexander May 1691 Henderson, Alexander Dec. 1802 Henderson, Alexander Oct. 1808 Henderson, Andrew.. Sept. 1717 Henderson, Bernard __ Oct. 1776 Henderson, David Dec. 1817 Henderson, Eagle May 1844 Henderson, Mungo __ Dec. 1817 Henderson, lames Sept. 1701 Hall, David ___ _ Aug. 1706 Hall, Robert J une J 79^ Hall, William Mar 1822 Hall, William ___ __ Oct. 1710 Hall, William Aug 1739 Hall, William __ __ Dec. 1777 Henderson, James __ July 1797 Appendix. XI Henderson, John May 1705 Henderson, John Oct. 1721 Henderson, John Dec. 1817 Henderson, Thomas__ Aug. 1788 Henderson, Thos., jr. June 1808 Henderson, William __ Oct. 1800 Henderson, William.. Oct. 1811 Henderson, William __ Mar. 1819 Henderson, William.. Sept. 1824 Henderson, William Aug 1857 Hume, William Jan. 1762 Hunter, Alexander __ Feb. 1735 Hunter, Andrew Nov. 1790 Hunter, Andrew Oct. 1810 Hunter, David J une '847 List of Members Hunter, David J une '862 Hunter, George July 1804 Hunter, James Feb. 1753 Hunter, James Jan. 1776 Hunter, James _ fuly 1791 Hendry, Robert Mar. 1695 Hepburn, John Mar 1695 Hunter, Fohn Sept. 1690 Hunter, John _ Oct. 1690 Hepburn, J ]u\y J 684 Hunter, John June 1812 Hepburn, Thomas __ Nov. 1754 Heriot, Alexander J u ty 1682 Heriot, Thomas Dec. 1734 Heriot, Thomas Oct. 1782 Heriot, Thomas Sept. 1816 Heswell, James July 1-851 Hewat, John ' Oct. 1845 Hunter, Robert Nov. 1691 Hunter, Robert Oct. 1697 Hunter, Wm., sen. __ Feb. 1736 Hunter, William Oct. 1776 Hunter, William Nov. 1795 Hunter, William Dec. 1834 Hutcheson, William __ Feb. 1694 Hutchison, Alexander Oct. 1782 Hutchison, Archibald June 1711 Hutchison, David Sept. 1706 Hutchison, James Oct. 1750 Hutchison, John Oct. 1767 Hutchison, Robert __ July 1690 Hutchison, Thomas April 1775 Hutton, James J u 'y J 7'8 Hill, Peter __ July 1813 Hill, Robert Mar. 1819 Hill, William, jun. __ Nov. 1816 Hodge, Alexander Dec. 1716 Hog, Walter Mar. 1734 Hogg, Thomas Nov. 1759 Hogg, William Mar. 1709 Hogg, William, jun. __ Aug. 1715 Hogg, William Sept 1815 Hutton, Tames J an> 1721 Home, Alexander Aug. 1701 Hoome, David May 1688 Hutton, John _ Nov. 1790 Hutton, Robert Oct. 1706 Hope, Alexander Jan. 1765 Hope, John Aug 1699 Hutton, Robert June 1839 Hutton, William Jan. 1688 Hopkirk, John Oct. 1691 Hutton, William July 1711 Hutton, William Jan. 1761 Inches, Alexander __ May 1844 Inches, Robert May 1844 Hopkirk, William __ Jan. 1688 Hopkirk, William __ May 1688 Horner, John __ _ _ Feb. 1777 Homer, Leonard Mar. 1825 Horsburgh, John Aug. 1718 Houstoun, Archibald Dec. 1755 Howie, John Sept. 1785 Inglis, Alexander Nov. 1790 Inglis, Charles Dec. 1824 Inglis, Claud J une ' 74^ Hume, Archibald Feb. 1698 Hume, Archibald Aug. 1710 Inglis, George Sept. 1815 Inglis, George, jun. __ Dec. 1820 xii Apfn idix. List of f nglis, lames . Dec. 1780 Kedslie, Andrew _ Dec. 1806 Members I nglis, John Oct. 1746 Kelso, Francis _ Feb. 1736 T nglis, Patrick Oct. 1690 Kennedy, Alexander Oct. 1793 T nglis, Patrick Aug. 1754 Kennedy, Tames Oct. 1799 T nnes, Alexander Jan. 1714 Keir, Adam Nov. 1786 T nnes, Charles Nov. 1774 Kerr, Alexander . April 1811 I nnes. Robert April 1855 Kerr, Andrew Mar 1859 T nnes, Theodore _ Sept. 1716 Kerr, Charles Nov 1790 I reland, Alexander May 1840 Kerr, Tames Mar. 1826 1 reland, Thomas May 1810 Kerr, John Feb. 1682 1 reland, Thomas, jun. June 1830 Kerr, Robert Oct. 1781 1 rvine, Robert Dec. 1843 Kerr, Thomas Sept. 1794 [ack, Andrew 3 J u 'y i%3 1 Kerr, Thomas, jun. Mar. 1819 Kerr, William Aug 1708 J [ackson, Charles __ ._ Dec. 1699 Kerr, William _ Nov. 1790 ackson, Tames J urie *777 Kerr, William Aug. 1857 . affray, William Dec. 1691 amieson, Alexander Sept. 1816 amieson, Peter Aug. 1857 amieson, Thomas __ Nov. 1790 amieson, Thos., jun. July 1797 amieson, William __ Dec. 1820 [effrey, David Aug. 1858 Kilgour, James Nov. 1816 Kilpatrick, John April 1705 Kincaid, Michael Dec. 1690 Kinghorn, Alexander April 1859 Kininmont, Alexander Nov. 1825 Kinnear, Alexander __ Nov. 1790 Kinnear, David Oct. 1793 effrey, John J une 1862 Kinnear, George Nov. 1782 - 'ohnston, A. Hall __ Nov. 1819 ohnston, Alex. Keith Jan. 1853 ohnston, James J u l/ 1801 ohnston, John _ uly 1804 ohnston, John J une '837 ohnston, John Dec. 1850 ohnston, Michael __ Oct. 1853 ohnston, Robert J u ty *797 ohnston, Thos B Tune 1862 Kinnear, George Oct. 1830 Kinnear, Robert July 1810 Kinnear, Thomas Jan. 1759 Kinnear, Thomas Nov. i8r8 Kirkland, Robert Feb. 1736 Kirkwood, James Sept. 1794 Kirkwood, James Oct. 1812 Kirkwood, Robert __ Dec. 1820 Knight, John May 1688 ohnston, Sir William June 1839 Knox, James May 1858 [ohnstone, John April 1693 Knox, Thomas J u ty 1856 [ohnstone, Patrick __ Jan. 1684 [ohnstone, Robert __ Feb. 1697 [ohnstone, Robert Dec. 1755 Lachlan, Joseph Jan. 1765 Laing Aug. 1721 [ollie, George __ Jan. 1688 Laing, James Oct. 1776 [oss, Robert J u ty J 797 Lamb, James __ Nov. 1719 Lamb, John Nov. 1683 Caigan, James April 1711 Lamb, William Aug. 1695 ECay, Thomas Nov. 1851 Lamb, William _ Feb. 1777 A * Appendix. xiii Landale, George Nov. 1816 Lamond, Alexander.. Nov. 1822 Lamond, John Aug. 1739 Lindsay, Robeit Oct. 1849 Lindsay, Thomas Nov. 1691 Lindsay, Thos. Steven Dec. 1858 Lithgow, James Nov. 1683 Lithgow, Robert Aug. 1730 Livingstone, Alexander April 1783 Livingstone, Alexander Nov. 1797 Livingstone, Alexander Sept. 1725 Livingstone, Alexander June 1832 Livingstone, John June 1749 Livingstone, John Oct. 1820 Livingstone, Josiah __ Oct. 1793 Livingstone, Josiah __ Oct. 1847 Livingstone, Josiah __ June 1859 Lizars, Daniel Nov. 1797 List of Members i Lamond, Peter Oct. 1799 Lauder, James _ _ Feb. 1736 Lauder, John Oct. 1804 Lauder, John May 1814 Law, William Oct. 1776 Lawrie, George Sept. 1816 Lawrie, John __ Oct. 1799 Lawson, Alexander __ Jan. 1698 Lawson, Andrew M. Jan. 1857 Lawson, Charles Mar. 1826 Lawson, Charles, jun. Jan. 1857 Lawson, George S. __ June 1862 Lawson, H. Graham Jan. 1860 Lawson, Tames _ Oct. 1782 Lizars, William Home Nov. 1844 Loch, David Oct. 1722 Lawson, Peter Dec. 1811 Loch, John Sept. 1705 Lawson, Robert Dec. 1709 Lawson, Robert Jan. 1860 Lawson, Stephen Oct. 1806 Lawson, William Oct. 1782 Learmont, John Oct. 1690 Learmonth, John, jun. Jan. 1789 Leechman, James Oct. 1814 Legh, Humphrey Sept. 1710 Lermont, Walter Jan. 1685 Leslie, George Nov. 1782 Lockhart, Andrew Sept. 1690 Lorimer, George J u ty- 1841 Lorimer, James J un e !74^ Lothian, George, jun. Jan. 1758 Lothian, John __ J an - J 7S^ Lothian, Mauiice Mar. 1814 Lothian, Walter Feb. 1782 Lothian, William Mar. 1796 Louthian, George Aug. 1691 Louthiane, George Sept, 1727 Low, Hugh Feb 1694 Leslie, John May 1696 Lewis, James _ Feb. i 857 Lucas, Robert Oct. 1806 Lewis, John Dec. 1814 Luke, Adam Feb 1817 Libberton, John Dec. 1684 Libberton, John J une 1696 Lightbody, Robert __ Sept. 1703 Lind, Adam _ J an - 1706 Luke, John Tune 1824 Lumsdaine, Archibald Mar. 1814 Lyall, John Sept l8iC Lyell, Thomas Tan 1708 Li nd, George Jan. 1688 Lyon, William Nov i8 *^93 Pringle, John Jan. 1688 Purdie, Thomas J u e 1861 Purves, Alexander __ Aug. 1740 Purves, Thomas ]uly 1804 Pym, Joseph April 1775 Paton, James . Faton, John Pyper, Thomas Mar 1819 Paton, William Raeburn, William __ Sept. 1794 Raimes, Richard June 1862 Rainie, Robert April 1859 Patterson, Thomas __ Pattison, William Paul, Alexander Pearson, John __ Ramage, Alexander Dec. 1785 Ramage, John Oct I7QX Pearson, William xviii Appendix. List of Membets Ramsay, George Sept 1732 Ramsay, George Dec. 1790 Ramsav, James Oct. 1814 Richardson, William Mar. 1796 Richardson, William May 1844 Richie, James J an - 1687 Ramsay, John May 1810 Richmond, James J U ^Y 1810 Ramsay, John J une 171 3 Richmond, John July 1804 Riddell, Alexander _. Feb. 1698 Riddell, George Feb. 1682 Ritchie, Alexander Jan. 1759 Ritchie, Charles May 1789 Ritchie, George May 1844 Ritchie, James _ __ Aug. ijn Ramsay, Peter Nov. 1818 Ramsav, Robert Feb. 1786 Ramsay, Robert, jun. June 1798 Ramsay, William Feb. 1736 Ramsay, William Mar. 1763 Ramsay, William, jun. Oct. 1788 Ranlten, Robert Dec. 1820 Ritchie, James Mar 1826 Rannie, Thomas June 1749 Rattray, Thomas J an *759 Ravenscroft,Edward__ April 1862 Reid, Alexander Dec. 1714 Reid, Alexander April 1783 Reid, Alexander Oct. 1795 Reid, Andrew _ May 1688 Ritchie, Robert Mar. 1826 Ritchie, William Oct. 1795 Robb, John Tan 1761 Robertson, J. May 1722 Robertson, Charles Aug. 1707 Robertson, Edward _. Dec. 1807 Robertson, Gilbert __ Dec. 1687 Robertson, James Feb. 1752 Robertson, James Oct. 1800 Robertson, James Mar. 1815 Robertson, James Dec. 1848 Robertson, John Dec. 1695 Reid, George Aug. 1731 Reid, Tames _ Sept. 1796 Reid, James, jun Mar. 1819 Reid, John ___ __ June 1725 Reid Tohn J u ty *797 Reid, William Sept. 1815 Robertson, John Oct. 1795 Robertson, John Sept. 1815 Roberts )n, John Mar 1828 Reid, William _ Mar. 1822 Reid William Oct 1847 Renton, Thomas April 1705 Renton, William Mar. 1805 Reoch, James ]u\y 1808 Robertson, John Dec. 1858 Robertson, Peter Oct. 1767 Robertson, Robert __ Feb. 1697 Robertson, William __ May 1699 Robertson, William __ April 1775 Robertson, William __ Oct. 1830 Robertsone, Daniel May 1699 Rodger, Thomas May 1709 Rodger, William Sept. 1693 Romaines, Jamts Dec. 1813 Rose, Hugh Feb. 1848 Reoch, John Dec. 1817 Rhind, Charles Nov. 1759 Richard, George J une 1807 Richardson, Francis__ May 1833 Richardson, James __ Dec. 1826 Richardson, James __ May 1852 Richardson, Jas., jun. Mar. 1819 Richardson, Peter __ Nov. 1818 Richardson, Ralph Jan. 1813 Richardson, Ralph __ Nov. 1823 Richardson, Richard Jan. 1789 Richardson, Robert April 1834 Richardson, Robert.. Oct. 1844 Ross, Alexander May 1810 Ross, David Feb. 1692 Ross David Nov. 1704 Ross, William Feb. 1697 Row, John _ Feb. 1736 Appendix. xix RO\V) Thomas Jan. 1685 Dec. 1858 Feb. 1697 April 1697 Aug. 1692 Nov. 1822 April 1834 Sept 1725 Dec. 1835 Oct. 1708 Sept. 1732 May 1688 June 1742 Dec. 1848 June 1713 Dec. 1776 Dec. 1814 Mar. 1815 Oct. 1739 Dec. 1833 July 1804 Mar. 1822 July 1851 Dec. 1755 Dec. 1811 Dec. 1807 Oct. 1793 Jan. 1765 Mar. 1796 May 1814 Feb. 1817 Sept. 1725 Dec. 1770 Jan. 1790 Dec. 1790 Nov. 1818 Feb. 1715 Oct. 1782 Aug. 1740 Mar. 1796 July 1810 Jan. 1758 Scott, Henry _ __ Dec. 1817 May 1244 Sept. 1747 July 1791 Jan. 1691 May 1810 Oct. 1799 Oct. 1848 Sept. 1703 Aug. 1682 Mar. 1807 May 1856 Nov. 1754 Jan. 1688 Jan. 1725 Sept. 1796 Mar. 1840 Sept. 1712 Nov. 1731 April 1753 Oct. 1788 July 1797 Jan. 1765 Mar. 1826 Nov. 1790 Oct. 1795 June 1749 Aug. 1743 Jan. 1711 Sept. 1714 Aug. 1745 Feb. 1736 June 1717 May 1777 Oct. 1777 Jan. 1789 Dec. 1857 Nov. 1857 April 1700 Nov. 1790 Dec. 1790 April 1832 June 1862 List of Members Roy, James Scott, Henry, jun. __ Scott, James Rule, Archibald Russel, John-- Scott, James Russell, Adam Scott, John Russell, Alexander __ Russell, Alexander __ Russell, David Scott, John Scott; Peter Scott, Peter Redford Scott, Richard Russell, George Eliza Russell, John Scott, Robert Russell, John Scott, Robert Russell, Robert Russell, Robert -Scott, Robert Scott, Robert, jun. __ Scott, Thomas Russell, Thomas Russell, Walter Scott, Thomas Russell Walter, Rutherford, John Rutherford, John Rutherford, William Rutherfurd, William Ruthven, Robert Rymer, David Scott, Thomas Scott, Walter D. Scott, William __ Scott, William Scott, William _ __ Scott, William Scott, William Samuel, Peter Scotland, William Scotland, William Samuel, Robert Sanderson, John Sanderson, Patrick __ Sanderson, Robert __ Sanderson, Thomas __ Sanderson, Thomas __ Sanderson, William __ Sanson, James Scougall, John Scoular, John Selkrig, Robert Seton, Daniel Seton, Tames Seton, James Seton, James, jun. Sawers, Charles Sawers, William Seton, Robert Seton, Walter Sawyers, William Scarth, Tames Shand, Francis Scarth, James Shennan, John Schaw, William Scoffier, Joseph Sheppard, James Sheriff, Charles Sherriff, Alexander ShitrifF, Robert Scott, Alexander Scott, Alexander Scott, Andrew Sibbald, John Scott, George Sibbald, John XX Appendix. List of Members Sibbald, Thomas May 1816 Sibbald, William Nov. 1790 Sifwright, Thomas __ Jan. 1688 Sievwright, Andrew.- Dec. 1801 Si me, Thomas May 1856 Spence, George J u ty 1810 Spence, James Jan. 1687 Spence, John J un ^ '74^ Spens, Robert Feb. 1697 Spital, James, jun. __ Nov. 1819 Spittal, Tames Nov. 1797 Simpson, Andrew June 1742 Simpson, George B Oct. 1849 Simpson, Henry Nov. 1691 Simpson, Henry June 1699 Simpson, James Aug. 1725 Simpson, James July 1797 Simpsone, James Dec. 1692 Simson, John Tan. 1688 Spittal, John Nov 1823 Spottiswood, John __ July 1791 Sprot, Alexander Dec. 1790 Stalker, William J une *7O9 Stark, John Dec. 1817 Steel, Alexander July 1797 Steele, James J an - 1751 Steele, Wilkinson ._ Dec. 1824 Stein, James Sept. 1796 Simson, Robert Jan. 1711 Sinclair, Tames Sept. 1815 Sinclair, John Dec. 1787 Stenhouse, John Tune 1742 Sinclair, John J u ty 1810 Stenson, George Aug. 1714 Stephen, Thomas Sept. 1729 Steven, William Mar. 1822 Stevenson, James J une 1798 Stevenson, John Dec. 1834 Stevenson, Michael May 1709 Stevenson, Peter Nov. 1759 Stevenson, Roger Jan. 1751 Stevenson, Samuel __ Feb. 1753 Stevenson, Thos. Geo. Mar. 1847 Stevenson, William __ June 1805 Stevinson, Alexander Feb. 1694 Stevinson, James Jan. 1688 Stewart, Archibald Aug. 1740 Stewart, Charles July 1714 Stewart, Daniel Sept. 1715 Stewart, David Sept. 1796 Sinclair, Malcolm Nov. 1801 Sivwright, John Feb. 1697 Skae, David Nov. 1782 Skinner, George Aug. 1706 Small, George J u ty 1813 Smellie, Alexander __ Nov. 1810 Smith, Alexander Oct. 1799 Smith, Andrew Jan. 1854 Smith, Donald J an - 1766 Smith, George Oct. 1690 Smith, James Taylor Oct. 1812 Smith, Robert Nov. 1797 Smith, Robert Oct. 1804 Smith, Thomas Mar. 1763 Smith, Thomas Sept. 1794 Smith, William Sept. 1747 Smyth, Robert Nov. 1683 Stewart, David May 1810 Smyth, Robert Feb. 1684 Stewart, George J an - 1762 Stewart, Gilbert Aug. 1682 Stewart, James Jan. 1707 Stewart, Tames _ Dec. 1754 Somervel, Robert July 1715 Somervill, David Aug. 1767 Sommerville, John __ Jan. 1691 Sommerville, William Feb. 1692 Sommerville, William May 1831 Spankie, George Nov. 1790 Speirs, John Aug. 1705 Stewart, James __ __ April 1775 Stewart, John Sept. 1727 Stewart, Malcolm Sept. 1794 Stewart, Mansfield __ Oct. 1782 Stewart, William Dec. 1740 Spence, David Dec. 1698 Appendix. xxi Stewart, William Still, Robert Jan. 1759 Jan. 1784 Aug. 1739 Sept. 1729 Dec. 1776 June 1798 Sept. 1817 Dec. 1836 Jan. 1761 Dec. 1714 Mar. 1825 Nov. 1790 May 1814 Jan. 1847 Dec. 1817 Mar. 1796 July 1707 Sept. 1816 Aug. 1719 May 1814 May 1858 Dec. 1852 Nov. 1797 April 1857 Jan. 1687 Dec. 1820 Aug. 1696 April 1698 Oct. 1840 Dec. 1852 Aug. 1739 Aug. 1713 Oct. 1 86 1 June 1742 Feb. 1690 Oct. 1798 June i 86 i Sept. 1817 Feb. 1701 Mar. 1783 Sept. 1796 May 1844 Thomson, Alexander Thomson, Alexander Thomson, Alex. S. __ Thomson, Andrew Thomson, Andw., jun. Thomson, Andrew A. Thomson, Archibald Thomson, Charles __ Thomson, David Dec. 1848 Feb. 1853 Nov. 1822 Aug. 1699 Nov. 1731 April 1813 June 1812 Mar. 1826 Aug. 1703 Feb. 1793 Dec. 1805 July 1826 July 1826 Feb. 1694 Feb. 1793 May 1810 July 1810 May 1831 Mar. 1840 Jan. 1688 Mar. 1762 Feb. 1793 July 1797 Jan. 1798 May 1810 July 1 80 1 Feb. 1782 July 1791 Mar. 1796 Aug. 1858 Oct. 1810 May 1699 Dec. 1790 Jan. 1798 June 1805 Oct. 1827 May 1816 Nov. 1795 May 1816 Feb. 1824 July 1841 Nov. 1857 Oct. 1724 List of Members Stirling, Alexander __ Stirling, James Stirling, James Stirling John Stodart, Alexander _- atodart, George Stodart, Tames _ Strachan, John Thomson, David Thomson, David Thomson, David J. __ Thomson, George G. Thomson, James Thomson, James Thomson, James Thomson, James Thomson, James Thomson, James G.__ Thomson, John Thomson, John Thomson, John Thomson, John Thomson, John Thomson, John Thomson, John Deas Thomson, John, jun. Thomson, Robert Thomson, Robert __ Thomson, Robert D. Thomson, Thomas __ Thomson, William __ Thomson, William _. Thomson, William __ Thomson, William __ Thorburn, George Thorburn, John Thorburn, William ._ Thorburn, Wm., jun. Tod, James Banks __ Tod, John Strathy, John Strong, Robert Strong, Thomas.. __ Sutherland, David R. Sutherland, John Sutherland, Thomas E. Suttor, William Swan, David Swan, James Swan, John Swan, John Russell Swanson, John Swanston, John Swanston, Thomas ._ Swinton, William __ Syme, John Symmer, John Tait, Alexander Tait, William Tait, William Tailour, John Taylor, John Taylor, John Taylor, William Telford, Charles Tenant, William Thin, James Thomson, Abraham Thomson, Alexander Thomson, Alexander Thomson, Alexander Thomson, Alexander Tod, John Tod, Oliver xxii Appendix. List of Members Tod, Thomas Tune 1740 Walker fames Sept 1704 Tod, William Aug. 171 c Walker, James Dec 1817 Tod, William Jan. 1725 Walker, James Nov. 1818 Tod, William J une 1742 Walker, James Mar 1861 Tod, William April 1825 Walker. Tohn Tulv 1701 Tod, William, sen. __ April 1730 Todd, James May 1609 Walker, John Dec. 181-7 Walker, Robert Aug. 1841 Walker, William Nov. 1724 Todd, Robert _ __ May 1688 Toran, Abraham Aug. 1691 Torry, Archibald July 1804 Torry, James Nov. 1769 Wallace, Alexander __ Dec. 1790 Wallace, Archibald, jun. Aug. 1731 Wallace, Charles Oct. 1767 Wallace, John Aug. 1740 Toward, Francis Jan. 1703 Trail, James May 1688 Wardlaw, Ebenezer __ July 1813 Wardlaw, Thomas __ June 1812 Wardrobe, David Jan. 1761 W^ardrop, John Oct 1806 Traill, John Tune 1725 Trotter, Archibald __ June 1749 Trotter, Thomas Aug. 1691 Trotter, Thomas Oct. 1724 Trotter, Thomas, jun. July 1748 Trotter, William Jan. 1769 Trotter, William J u ty J 797 Turnbull, Cornelius __ May 1688 Turnbull, John Jan. 1688 Turnbull, John Dec. 1699 Turnbull, John July 1804 Turnbull, Robert Dec. 1857 Turnbull, Thomas __ Sept. 1772 Turnbull, William __ Oct. 1782 Tweedie, Alexander.. Jan. 1790 Usher, Andrew May 1816 Valance, David Dec. 1802 Vallance, George April 1 843 Veitch, George Jan. 1766 Veitch, Robert Oct. 1705 Veitch, William June 1862 Waddel, William Aug. 1807 Waddell, William __ Oct. 1709 Walker, Alexander __ Oct. 1708 Walker, Andrew Aug. 1814 Walker, James. Feb. 1703 Waterston, Richard __ Mar. 1819 Waterstone, James __ Aug. 1708 Watherston, James __ Aug. 1861 Watherston, William Aug. 1861 Watkins, Richard __ Nov. 1708 Watson, Ebenezer __ Oct. 1827 Watson, George July 1791 Watson, George Nov. 1809 Watson, James Oct. 1779 Waugh, James, jun. __ June 1748 W^atson, John Aug. 1703 Watson, John Sept. 1732 Watson, John Nov. 1790 W^augh, John Dec 1805 Watson, John Aug. 1847 Watson, John, jun. May 1816 Watson, Robert Feb. 1694 Watson, Robert Jan. 1715 Weddell, James July 1797 Weir, John J U ^Y 1691 Weir, John Jan. 1762 Weir, John Oct. 1847 Weir, John, jun Oct. 1718 Welsh, John __ Aug. 1720 Wemyss, David Sept. 1701 Wemyss, David Sept. 1815 Wemyss, George June 1742 Walker, Tames Sept 1771; Appendix. xxiii White, Adam Dec. 1790 Wood, Christopher __ Dec. 1806 Wood. Tames Nov. 1607 List of Members White, George Oct. 1788 White Tames Mar. 1819 W\jod, James Mar. 1730 White^John Oct. 1786 Wood, John April 1828 White John Oct. 1788 ! Wood, Peter Nov. 1790 White, John Sept. 1704 Wood. Walter . Sent. I?OA White, John Aitken Mar. 1859 Whitehead, William ._ June 1824 Wight, Alexander __ Dec. 1823 Williamson, Duncan Nov. 1693 Williamson, George.. Dec. 1817 Williamson, James __ Oct. 1793 Williamson, James Dec. 1804 Williamson, J.,jun.__ Nov. 1818 Williamson, Robert Jan. 1749 Williamson, Thomas June 1798 Williamsone, John __ May 1688 Wilkie, James _ _ Dec. 1755 Wright, Alexander __ Feb. 1682 Wright, Alexander July 1705 Wright, Alexander __ Nov. 1823 Wright, Alexander B. May 1844 Wright, Charles Wm. June 1862 Wright, George Nov. 1822 Wright, George Aug. 1857 Wright, John _ _ __ Aug. 1686 WVight, John J une '749 Wright, John Oct. 1793 Wright, Malcolm Oct. 1776 Wright, Robert Aug. 1745 Wright, Robert June 1823 Wyber, Patrick Oct. 1710 Wyld, James Dec. 1811 Wilkie, John Feb. 1697 Willison, David Dec. 1790 Willison, Robert April 1698 Wingate, Patrick Aug. 1710 Wingrave, Matthew Dec. 1826 Wilson, Alexander Aug. 1684 Wilson, Andrew April 1775 Wilson, Andrew Dec. 1802 Wilson, James May 1688 Wyld, William Dec. 1820 Wylie, David Aug. 1730 Wylie, Henry Aug. 1683 Yetts, William Dec 1777 Yool, Robert Aug. 1715 Wilson, Tames Sept 1705 Young, Archibald __ Nov. 1839 Young, James _ Aug. 1692 Wilson, James Mar. 1826 Wilson, ohn Tan 1726 Young, fames Nov 1724 Wilson, John _ __ Sept. 1816 Young, James Mar. 1826 Wilson, Robert Nov 1691 Young, Tames Tune 1862 Wilson, Robert Feb. 1753 Wilson, Robert Nov. 1825 Wilson, William Jan. 1687 Wilson, William Jan. 1704 Wishart, James April 1825 Wishart, John Kay __ May 1858 Work, Peter Aug. 1854 Young, John Sept. 1813 Young, Tohn H Aug 1784 Young, Richard June 1802 Young, Robert July 1748 Young, Thomas June 1717 Young, William Nov. 1825 Younger, William __ Aug. 1858 Yule, George July 1 803 Wood, Andrew July 1813 xxiv Appendix* Number of Members No. II. NUMBER of MEMBERS annually ad- mitted into the Merchant Company, from 1777 to 1862. Year of No. of Year of No. of Year of No. of Entry Members Entry Members Entry Members 1777 14 iBcfi TA iS-Jc-^ c 1 778 o 1 807 I C 1876-77 6 1779 6 1780 o 1808 . 6 18:7-78 7 1 8OQ Q 1878-70 1781 __ o l8lO __ 22 *".)" jy *f 187.0-40 _ 8 1782 78 1811 13 1840*41 c 178^ o 1812 13 1 841-42 3 1784. 7 1813 16 1842-4-2 I 7 8c A l8l4. 4O 1847-44 1 6 1786 8 1815 17 1 844-4 c 4 1787 10 1816 36 i8A<;-4.6 6 1788 i<; 1817 71 1846-47 6 1 780 1818 29 1747-48 14 I7QO CO l8lO 27 1848-40 10 I 7QI - I 7 l82O 12 1840-So 8 1 70Z O 1821 3 i8<;o-er to make such additional provision, then it shall and may be lawful :o three-fourths of the Members present at another general meeting, to )e called for the purpose, at the distance of not less than two months rom the said first meeting, at which last meeting not less than thirty- two Members shall be present ; and, upon the report of a person or per- sons, experienced in the calculation of the value of annuities, to fix and modify the rate of the increased annuity to be allowed to the widows, and the sums of money to be levied from the contributors to the said Widows' Fund, which may be considered adequate to the provision of the said additional annuities to the widows, and the sums of money which it may be thought expedient to levy from the Members of the said Company, for the purpose of increasing the allowances to the Mem- bers in decayed or indigent circumstances: provided always, that it shall be optional to the contributors to the Widows' Fund, existing at the time of such resolution, either to pay the additional contributions, and acquire right to the additional annuities, for their widows, or to remain on the former footing: provided always, that it shall not be competent to, nor in the power of the said Company, at any time to raise the entry-money and contributions of the persons applying to be admitted Members of the said Company to a greater extent, upon the whole, than double the amount hereinbefore authorized to be exacted. XXV. Rate of annuity to continue until altered. XXVI. Annuities not to be assignable nor attachable by creditors, nor subject to the jus mariti of any husband whom a widow may after- wards marry, or be liable to his debts or deeds, but the same shall be payable to each widow entitled to the same, upon her own receipt, not- withstanding such arrestment, attachment, or marriage. XXVII. Contributors being married, may declare the annuity to be in part of the provision otherwise made for their wives. XXVIII. Trustees to be chosen at a meeting of contributors Master and Old Master, if contributors, to be Trustees of the said Widows Fund, who shall be called and denominated " The Trustees of the Widows Appendix. xliii Widows' Fund of the Company of Merchants of the City of Edinburgh j" and any three of the said Trustees shall be a quorum. XXIX. Seniority among Trustees how fixed ; Trustees to go out by rotation j one new Trustee to be chosen annually. Trustees going out may be re-elected, after being one year out of office. XXX. Trustees to hold three stated meeting annually ; and besides the above stated meetings, the said Trustees shall hold such occasional meetings as circumstances may require. XXXI. And be it enacted, That at all meetings of contributors to the said Widows' Fund the Master of the said Company, if a contributor, and in his absence the Old Master, if a contributor, and in the absence of both, the senior Trustee present shall be the Preses of such meeting, and such Preses shall have both a deliberative and a casting vote. XXXII. Mode in which rights and securities are to be taken to Trustees. XXXIII. Mode in which moneys belonging to Widows' Fund are to be invested. XXXIV. Trustees may sue or be sued in person of Collector. XXXV. ACollector to be appointed. XXXVI. Collector may be suspended. XXXVII. Collector to make up a state of the arrears. XXXVIII. Collector to give security. XXXIX. Collector's salary or allowance how to be fixed. XL. Collector to deposit the money in a bank or banking-house to be named by the Trustees. XLI. Trustees to be liable for intromissions only, and to be reim- bursed of all necessary expenses. XLII. Power to contributors to make rules and regulations. XLIII. And whereas the said Company of Merchants are by the original Charter, or Letters Patent hereinbefore recited, under which the Company are incorporated, specially empowered to meet annually on the first Monday of September, for the purpose of electing a Master and twelve Assistants, whereof seven are thereby declared to be a quorum, A6tof Parliament i8zy xliv Parliament 1827 Appendix. quorum, with Treasurer, Clerk, and Officer ; but no special power is given to the said Company to supply any vacancy or vacancies which may occur among any of the foresaid office-bearers, by death, resig- nation or otherwise : And whereas it has been found from experience, that a quorum composed of seven of the said Master and Assistants is inconveniently large for the due despatch of business, be it therefore enacted, That in the event of a vacancy occurring at any time among the said Master and Assistants, or other dffice-bearers aforesaid, it shall be lawful and competent to the Members of the said Company, and they are hereby required to elect another person to supply such vacancy, either at the next stated meeting of the Company, or at a general meet- ing of the Company to be called for the purpose, and to be held within one month after the death or resignation of the said Master, Assistant, or other office-bearer aforesaid ; and it is further declared, that at all meetings of the Master and Assistants of the said Company, and at all general meetings of the Company requiring a quorum of the Master and Assistants to be present thereat, to be held after the passing of this Act, any five of the said Master and Assistants present at such meetings shall form a quorum; and in the case of all meetings of the said Master and Assistants such quorum shall have full power to discharge all the ordinary business falling under the administration of the said Master and Assistants. XLIV. Preses of all Meetings, whether of the Company or of the Master and Assistants, to have both a deliberative and a casting vote. XLV. Company not to compel any person to enter. XLVI. Expense of Act how to be defrayed. XL VII. That this Act shall be deemed and taken to be a public Act, and shall he judicially taken notice of as such, by all judges, justices, and others, without being specially pleaded. No. VIII. Appendix. xlv No. VIII. LINEAGE of Sir George War- render of Lochend, Treasurer of the Merchant Company in 1690. [From Burke*; Peerage and Baronetage."} I. GEORGE WARRENDER, Esq. of Lochend, an eminent Merchant of Edinburgh, having filled the office of Lord-Provost of that city in the reigns of King William, Queen Anne, and King George I., was cre- ated a Baronet by the latter monarch, for his zealous loyalty, 2nd June 171 5> from which year he represented the Scottish metropolis in Parlia- ment until the period of his decease. Sir George married, 1st, Margaret Lawrie, by whom he had an only son, JOHN, his successor. He married, zndly, Grisell, daughter of Hugh Blair, Esq., a Merchant and Magistrate of Edinburgh. Sir George was succeeded by the son of his ist wife, II. SIR JOHN, who married, in 1720, Henrietta, daughter of Sir Patrick Johnston. Sir John, dying in 1773, was succeeded by his only surviving son, III. SIR PATRICK, born 7th March 1731 ; a cavalry officer of rank at the battle of Minden, and M.P. for the burghs of Haddington, Dun- bar, &c. Married, in 1780, Miss Blair. Sir Patrick was King's Re- membrancer in the Court of Exchequer. He died in 1799, and was succeeded by, IV. SIR GEORGE, born 5th December 17825 married, 1810, Anne, youngest daughter of George-Evelyn, third Viscount Falmouth. Sir George died in 1849, and was succeeded by his brother, V. SIR JOHN, born in 17865 an officer in the foot guards} married, 1st, Lady Juliana- Jane Maitland, daughter of the Earl of Lauderdale 5 and, 2ndly, the Hon. Frances-Henrietta Arden, sister of Lord Alvanley. No. IX. Lineage of Sir G. Warrender xlvi Appendix. Report of Conversa- zione, 1862 No. IX. REPORT of Conversazione, at which Mr K. Johnston's Lecture was delivered. [From the Newspapers of the day.~] ON Friday the 1 1 th April, the Master of the Merchant Company held a Conversazione in the Hopetoun Rooms, which was attended by about 350 gentlemen, of whom a large proportion were Members of the Company. The entrance-hall was most brilliantly decorated with plants and exotics of rich flowering and verdure, and the rooms were otherwise fitted up in the most tasteful manner. After spending about half-an-hour in conversation, the company assembled in the odtagon, where Mr LAWSON, the Master, took the chair, and the Lecturer's desk was occupied by Mr A. KEITH JOHNSTON, F.R.S.E. Among the audi- tory we observed the following : Lord Ardmillan; SirW. Dick Cunningham, Sir William Johnston ; Professors Christison, Kelland, Macdougall, Laycock, Allman, Balfour, and Archer; Colonel Geddes, C.B. ; Colonel Maclean, R. A. ; Dr New- bigging, P.R.C.S. ; Drs Alex. Wood, Begbie, Andrew Wood, William Brown, Gillespie, Burn Murdoch, Coldstream, James Duncan, Scoresby Jackson, Ormond, Matthews Duncan, Stevenson Macadam, John Struthers, and Sellar ; Rev. Drs Smith, Nisbet, Forbes, Hodson ; Revs. J. F. Montgomery, W. Smith, D. Henderson, W. H. Gray, William Robertson ; Bailies Boyd, Russell, Mossman, Auchie ; Councillors Wil- son, Hope, Mair, Kay, Menelaws, Ridpath, Pearson, Crighton, Hill, White, Cochrane, Callender, Alexander ; Mr Marwick, Town-Clerk ; Mr D. Cousin, Mr R. L. Dymock ; Mr Brand of Union Bank ; Mr Henry Stephens ; Messrs Miller of Leithen, Samuel Raleigh, David Smith, R. Christie, jun. ; A. K. Morrison, Robert Morham, F. Carter, J. S. Darling, W.S. ; David Dickson, W. Forrester, J. Campbell Smith, T. G. Murray, W.S. ; J. A. Campbell, John M'Laren, advocate ; James Bryson, J. C. Thomson, advocate ; George Harvey, R.S.A. ; Robert Horn, Appendix. xlvii Horn, advocate 5 George Meldrum, W.S. j Charles Morton, W.S. 5 John Millar, David Rhind, James Drummond, R.S.A. j Maurice Lothian, Adam Curror, T. B. Johnston, James Hope, D.K.S. $ T. Leburn, S.S.C. j James Macandrew $ &c. Mr LAWSON said My Lord Ardmillan and Gentlemen, my dudes on this occasion in taking the chair are extremely light. As Master of our old and honourable Company, I have to welcome my fellow Members to the reunion this evening ; and I rejoice to see such a large attendance of the Company, and to observe so many, who like myself joined when this century was not half so old as it is at present. I am also not displeased that the limited accommodation of our own Hall in the Old Town gave me an excuse to go elsewhere, and in these rooms afforded me an opportunity of inviting a number of gentlemen distinguished in other communities of the city, whom, on the part of the Company, I thank for the honour of their presence among us this evening. My remaining duty now is the formality of introducing a well-known and much valued Member of the Company, Mr Keith Johnston, who has so kindly undertaken the real business of the even ing. The subject of the Lecture, " The Geographical Distribution of Material Wealth," must be interesting to us all, but more especially to us as a trading community. It is also of peculiar interest at the pre- sent time when in our own city we have just obtained the commence- ment of a most valuable Industrial Museum, under the able direction of Professor Archer, and where we expect shortly to see in the metro- polis of this kingdom the gathering together under one roof of the finest specimens of all the substances, organic and inorganic, which under the hand of man constitute the wealth of the world. No one can handle a geographical subject better than Mr Johnston, to whom in his valuable Atlases, this country and the civilized world at large, are indebted for the greatest and most complete series of illustrations both of common and physical geography. I would allude specially to the latter branch of science, for 1 think in Mr Keith Johnston's great Physical ) we have often in a single page an amount of information in one of Report of Conversa- zione, i86z xlviii Appendix. Report of Conversa- zione, 1862 of the highest departments of human knowledge which he could not obtain otherwise than by the careful study of many volumes. The large map before me and the small one in our hands are apt illustra- tions of what I am saying 5 but I shall not detain you any longer with my remarks, and Mr Johnston will now perhaps favour us by proceed- ing with the Lecture. Mr KEITH JOHNSTON then delivered his Lecture. At the close of the Lecture, Lord ARDMILLAN moved a cordial vote of thanks. He said it was a great honour to Edinburgh to have among its citizens, and to this Company to number among its Members, so distinguished a man of science as Mr Keith Johnston. No subject, he thought, could have been more appropriately chosen for a Lecture to be addressed to a Company that was the representative of Commerce in this community; and no one could have handled the subject more judiciously, attractively, and scientifically, than the gentleman to whom they had just listened with so much pleasure and interest. Dr ALEXANDER WOOD seconded the motion. Mr RICHARDSON, Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce, moved a vote of thanks to Mr Lawson for the excellent entertainment he had provided ; remarking that that gentleman had been selected to fill dif- ferent seats of honour in this city, and was truly worthy of any higher honour which his citizens had yet to confer. Professor ARCHER seconded the motion. Mr LAWSON then expressed his thanks for the kind manner in which the company had been pleased to receive his endeavour to enable them to pass an agreeable evening. The company were then invited to partake of refreshment j and between ten and eleven they gradually separated. Private Press of Peter Lawson & Son, Edinburgh. Jm^H^v * FTH& ^-v t f UNIVERSITY 1 of / UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY BERKELEY Return to desk from which borrowed. This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. NOV 16 Tf> 30 1957 REC'D LD FEB 1 9 1958 REC'D LD DEC 2 7 -63 -2 P LD 21-100m-9,'47(A5702sl6)476