^■-v';l' THE WORKS OF THE REV. JOHN HOWE, M. A. WITH MEMOIRS OF HIS LIFE, BY EDMUND CALAMY, D. D COMPLETE IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. I. NEW-YORK: PUBLISHED BY JOHN P. HAVEN, No. 148 NASSAU STREET. E. Sanderson, Printer, ElizahetMown, N. J. MDCCCXXXVIII. 1% ^7" V. I CONTENTS. The Life of Mr. John Howe. The Living TemiT.e; or a desig^ied Improve- ment of that Notion, That a Good Man is the Tem- ple of God. Part I. Concerning C-^d's Exi.stence, and hi.s Con- ver.sableness with Man. Against Atheism, or the Epicurean Deism Chap. I. This notion common. Authorities need- less. Insignificant with the atheistical, who have made it more necessar}^ to defend religion, and a temple in general, than this, or that. Better defended against them by practice and use, than argument, whereof they are incapable. Often disputes of its principles not necessary to the practice of religion. Some consideration of those supposed in the general notion of a temple, pertinent (however) to this discourse Chap. II. I. The two more principal grounds which a temple supposes. First, The existence of God. Secondly, His conversableness with men : both argued from common consent. Doubt- ful if the first were ever wholly denied in former days. The second also implied. First, In llie known general practice of some or other religion. Evidenced, Secondly, In that some, no strangers to the world, have thought it the diflerence of man. II. The immodesty and rashness of the persons from whom any opposition can be ex- pected. III. These two grounds, namely, the existence of God, and his conversableness with men, proposed to be more strictly considered apart. And, FIRST, The existence of God, where the notion of God is assigned. The parts whereof are proposed to be evinced severally of some existent being. First, Eternity. Secondly, Self-origination. Thirdly, Independency. Fovrf'/i- ly. Necessity of existence. Fifthly, Self-activity. (^The impossibility that this world should be this necessary self-active being. The incon- sistency of necessary alterable matter, more largely deduced in a marginal digression.) Sixthly, Life. Seventhly, Vast and mighty power. A corollary Chap. III. Wisdom asserted to belong to this Being. The production of this world by a mighty agent destitute of wisdom impo.ssible. On consideration of, 1. "What would be adverse to this production. 2. What would be wanting; some effects to which a designing cause will, on all hands, be confessed necessary, having mani- fest characters of skill and design upon them. Absurd here to except the works of nature ; wherein at least equal characters of wisdom and design are to be seen, as in any the most confess- ed pieces of art, instanced in the frame and mo- tion of heavenly bodies. A mean unphilosophical temper, to be more taken with novelties, than common things of greater importance. Further instance, in the composition of the bodies of animals. Two contrary causes of men's not acknowledging the wisdom of their Maker herein. Progress is made from the consideration of the parts and frame, to the powers and func- tions, of terrestrial creatures. Growth, nutrition, propagation of kind. Spontaneous motion, sen- sation. The pretence considered, that the bodies of animals are machines. 1. How improbable it is. 2. How little to the purpose. The powers of the human soul. It appears, notv:ithsianding thevi, it had a cause ; by thim, a wise and intell'- gent cause. It is not matter. That not capable of reason. They not here reflected on who think reasonable souls made of refined matter, by the Creator. Not being matter, nor arising from thence, it must have a cause that is intelligent. Goodness belonging to this Being 14 Chap. IV. Generally all supposable perfection asserted of this Being ; where, First, A being absolutely perfect is endeavoured to he evinced from the (already proved) necessary bei ig; which is shown to import, in the general, the utmost fulness of being. Also divers things in particular that tend to evince that general. As that it is at the remotest distance from no being. Most pure- ly actual. Most abstracted being. The produc- tive and conserving cause of all things else. Un- diminishable. Incapable of addition. Secondly, Hence is more expressly deduced. The infinite- ness of this being. An inquiry whether it be possible the creature can be actually infinite ? Difficulties concerning the absolute fulness and infiniteness of God considered. 2. The oneline.<:s of this being. The trinity not thereby excluded. 30 Chap. V. Demands in reference to what hath been hitherto discoursed, with some reasonings there- upon : 1. Is it possible that, upon supposition of this being's existence, it may be, in any way suitable to our present state, made known to us that it doth exist 1 Proved, 1. That it may. 2. That, since any other fit way that can be thought on is as much liable to exception as that we have already, /Aismustbe, therefore, sufficient. Strong impressions. Glorious apparitions. Terrible voices. Surprising transformations. If these are necessary, is it needful they be universal ? fre- quent 1 if not, more rare things of this sort not wanting. 2. Demand. Can subjects, remote from their prince, sufficiently be assured of his exist- ence 1 3. Demand. Can we be sure there are men on earth 1 37 Chap. VI. What is intended by God's conversa- bleness with men, considered only as fundamen- tal and presupposed to a temple. An account of the Epicurean deity. Its existence impossible any way to be proved, if it did exist. Nor can be affirmed to any good intent. That such a be- ing is not God. That the absolute perfection proved of God represents him a fit object of re- ligion. From thence more particularly deduced to this purpose, His omnisciency, omnipotency, unlimited goodness, immensity. Curcellsus's arguments against this last considered. . . Part II. Containing Animadversions on Spinosa, and a French Writer pretending to confute him. With a Recapitulation of the Former Part, and an Account of the Destitution and Restitution of God's Temple among men Chap. I. Wherein is .shown, the destructivene'^s of Spinosa's scheme and design to religion and the temple of God. The repugnancy of his doctrine to this assertion — That whatsoever exists neces- sarily and of itself, is absolutely perfect j which 45 56 3J;2085'' CONTENTS. is therefore further weighed. His vain attempt to prove what he designs. His second proposition considered. His definition of a substance defec- tive. Proves not his purpose. His third, fourth, and fifth proposition. His eighth scholia. The riMnuductlo ad pantosophiam 59 Chap. II. Animadversions from a French writer, nameles.s. His pretence to confute Spinosa. The opinion of the workl's being made of in- dependent self-existing matter ; chosen by hiin and a.sserted against two other opinions. That of matter's being created out of nothing rejected, and falsel)'^ charged with novelty. Mo.ses, and the author to the Hebrews misalleged, vindicat- ed. Self-originate, independent matter di.sproved: asserted by this author with evident self-contra- diction ; and without necessity Gi Chap. III. The reason of what next follows. Di- rections to readers not wont to inquire into the grounds of their religion. A summary and plainer proposal unto such, of what hath been said in the former Part, concerning God's exist- ence and conversablcness with men. The reason- ableness (so much being already evinced) of alleging, and relying upon the testimony of the Holy Scriptures. The expressness of that testi- mony concerning the unity of the Godhead, the trinity therein. The absolute perlection of the divine nature. The infiniteness of God's know- ledge, power, goodness, and presence. His pro- pensions towards men, and aptness (supposing there were no obstruction) to human converse. Matters of doubt herein resolved 67 Chap. IV. That there is an obstruction to this intercourse. The method of the following dis- course. Man's apostacy from God, and the vitiated state of his nature ; not only represented in the sacred writings, but also acknowledged and lamented by pagans : — very mistakenly, in some respects ; wherein perhaps some of them not justly understood. This not the primitive state of man ; therefore not to be imputed to the Author of nature. The temple of God hereby became unfit for the divine presence. Unsuitable. Disaffected. Hereupon forsaken, and most justly 71 Chap.V. The restitution of this temple undertaken by the Emmanuel : First, more darkly prefigured; afterward, more clearly manifested. This con- stitution of Emmanuel sufiicient. Necessary for this pui-pose. That he was himself to be the plat- form, the foundation, and the founder of it. The original temple. And was, in order hereto, also a sacrifice; to procure that God might honourably, and without wrong to his governing justice, return, and have his abode with men. A.nd that they might become prepared to receive his returning presence. For which purpose he hath in him the power of giving the Holy Spirit, on the account of this sacrifice. That when God is, for the sake of it, willing; we might no longer remain unwilling. That unwillingness to be overcome by the power and spirit of Emmanuel ; as hereafter to be more fully shown. But working (suitably to an intelligent subject) in a rational way. To which a great accom- modateness, in the constitution of Emmanuel. As demonstrating divine love, and holiness. In its loveliness. Possibility of being attained. . 77 Ch.vp. VI. The necessity of this constitution of Emmanuel to the erecting God's temple in the world. The discoursing of this matter, proper on this occasion. As to God's part herein, first, proposed to show, both that a recompense wa.s necessary to be made, and that it could be made no other way. Towards the evincing the former, sundry things gradually laid down. The point itself argued, by considering the injury done to the divine, with what we may suppose done to a human, government ; where repentance not con- stantly thought a sufficient recompense ; other- wise, a penitent delinquent was never to be pu- nished. Difierence between God's pardon and man's in most usual cases. Recompense for wrong done to government, quite another thing from what answers the appetite of private re- venge. Expressions that seem to import it in God, how to be understood. Shown that they import no more than a constant will so far to punish oflences, as is necessary for the asserting and preserving the rights and dignity of his go- vernment. So much most agreeable, and neces- sarily belonging to the perfection of the divine nature. And if' the justice of a human govern- ment requires it, of the divine much more. . . 84 Chap. VII. The notion of justice in the divine government, and in a human, not altogether the same. A thing said to be just, in a negative and a positive sense. The question discussed. Whether God's will to punish sin were, antecedently to his legal constitution to that purpose, just, not only in the former sense, but in the latter alsol Volenti mm ft injuria, as to man needs limita- tion. Holy Scripture speaks of God's punishing sin, not merely as a concomitant of justice, but an effect. His will to punish it must proceed from justice ; not, primarily, according to the common notion of justice, as it respects the rights of another ; therefore another notion of it (as to him) to be sought. God's rights so una- lienable, that he cannot quit them to his owti wrong as man can. Secondarily, according to the other notion, his right to punish depends not on his legal constitution, but that on it. That he cannot altogether quit it, no detraction from him. Justice, in a larger notion, doth further oblige to insist upon recompense ;fi2r. universal justice, as especially it comprehends his holiness, his wisdom. The fitness of God's methods here- in not to be only contemplated by men, but an- gels. In what sense punishments to be reckoned debts. This matter summed up 89 Chap. VIII. The first head thus far insisted on, that a sufficient recompense was necessary : the second succeeds, that no less was sufficient than that made by Emmanuel. Dishonour to have insisted on less. What the divine estimate in this matter was, his own word shows. His love to oflenders otherwise under restraint. Pro- posed to consideration, 1. How great things were to be remitted, the sins of all times, and ages. Not from insufficiency unapplicable to ail sinners. Remission to be granted, by a uni- versal law. 2. How great to be vouchsafed. Which follows 93 Chap. IX. Concerning the gift or communication of the Spirit. The Gospel the means of it. The inseparable connexion hereof with the former, the imparting of righteousness, for removing theguilt of sin. In what sense the Holy Spirit of God is said to be given, or commimicated. What per- sonal union signifies. How personal presence, vital union, communicated influences, concern the inquiry. In what respect the necessity assert- ed of this communication. Since such fulness of Spirit in Emmanuel, purposely for communica- tion ; how comes it to pass he, thereby, raises no more such temples; the necessity of this com- munication, for this purpose, represented two ways: by showing, 1. Thv 'he Holy Scripture leaches that God doth g^vt his Spirit, though under distinct notiojis, only through Christ. 2. That it was most reasonable, and therefore ne- cessary it should be so. The doctrine of Scrip- ture hen:in proposed under sis head-s. . , , , 97 CONTENTS. Chap. X. The fir.";! of the mentioned six heads insist- ed on — Thai the spirit is given both as a Builder, and as an Inhabitant of this temple. Scripture testimony concerning the former of those, and the latter. And for the sake of his death and suffer- ings. Anciently, the blessing of Abraham, and his seed from age to age, upon this account. More copiously and to other nations, when the fulness of time was come. Christ's death hath influence for these two purposes with much dif- ference, to be afterwards explained. Colossians i. 19, 20, 21. largely opened. A digression re- lating thereto. The principal import of that text, to show the dependence Christ's whole work of reconciliation, both of God to us, and of ns to God, had upon his sacrifice on the cross. The latter whereof is elfected by his Spirit, obtained by that sacrifice. Other texts to the same pur- pose. Further noted, that the Spirit is expressly said to be given by Christ, or in his name, &c. Given for building or preparing a temple, by a less certain, known rule 101 Chap. XI. The sixth head proposed before, now insisted on. That for the purpose of inhabiting this temple, already formed, the Spirit is given by the Emmanuel, as a trustee. The Oecnnonius, or chief Steward of God's household. And by a certain, known rule. Giving them, that are to partake therein, the ground of a rightful claim unto this great and most comprehensive gift. Whereupon to be considered. The dueness, amp4itude, or comprehensiveness thereof (1.) The dueness of it. 1. By promise. 2. By this promise, its having the form of a covenant, resti- pulated on their part. 3. From their state of sonship, as regenerate. Adopted. 4. From their being to receive it by faith. (2.) Its ample ex- tent, measured by the covenant, considered partly in actu sigiiato. In actu exercito. Infers recon- ciliation, relation. The summary of the covenant refers to it. The conclusion lOG The Reconcileableness of God's Prescience of the Sins of Men, with the Wisdom and Sincerity of his Counsels, Exhortations, and whatsoever Means he uses to prevent them. In a Letter to the Hon. Robert Bo}le, Esq. To which is added a Postscript in De- fence of the said Letter 114 Man's Creation in a holy but mutable State. — Eccl. vii. 29. Lo, this only have I fmhtul, that God hath made man upright ; but they have sought out many inventions 132 A Calm and Sober Inquiry concerning the Possi- bility of a Trinity in the Godhead, in a Letter to a Person of worth ; occasioned by the lately published Considerations on the Explications on the Doctrine of the Trinity, by Dr. Wallis, Dr. Sherlock, Dr. S — th, Dr. Cudworth, &c. Together with certain Letters, formerly written to the Reverend Dr. Wal- lis on the same subject 136 A Letter to a Friend concerning a Postscript to the Defence of Dr. Sherlock's Notion of the Trinity in Unity, relating to the Calm and Sober Inquiry upon the same subject 151 A View of that part of the late Considerations ad- dressed to H. H. about the Trinity, which concerns the Sober Inquiry on that subject. In a Letter to the former friend 157 A Letter written out of the Country to a Person of quality in the City, who took offence at the late Ser- mon of Dr. Stillingfleet, (Dean of St. Paul'.?,) before the Lord Mayor 168 Some Consideration of a Preface to an Inquiry concerning the occasional Conformity of Dissenters. 180 Thb Blessedness of the Righteous opened, and further recommeaded from the Consideration of 191 194 198 201 the Vanity of this Mortal Life. In Two Treatises, on Psalm xvii. 15. As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness: I shall be salisfcd, v:hen I aicuke, vith thy likeness : and Psalm Ixxxix. 47. Remember ho7C short my time is: wherefore hast th-ou made all men in vain ? 187 Chap. I. A proemial discourse. A reflection upon some foregomg verses of the psalm, by way of introduction to the text. A consideration of its somewhat various readings, and of its literal im- portance. A discussion of its real importance so far as is necessary to the settling the subject of the present discourse Chap. II. A summary proposal of the doctrine contained in this scripture. A distribution of it into three distinct heads of discourse ; viz. 1. The qualified subject. 2. The nature. 3. The season of the blessedness here spoken of. The first of these taken into consideration, where the qualifi- cation, righteousness, is treated of. About which is shown, 1. What it is. 2. How it qualifies. . Chap. III. The nature of this blessedness pro- pounded unto consideration, in the three ingre- dients (here mentioned) whereof it consists. 1. Vision of God's face. 2. Assimilation to him, 3. The satisfaction resulting thence. These pro- pounded to be considered, 1. Absolutely and singly, each by itself 2. Relatively, in their mutual respects to each other. The first of these, Vision of God's face, discoursed of. 1. The ob- ject. 2. The act Chap. IV. The second ingredient into this bless- edness considered. Assimilation to God, or his glory imprest. Wherein it consists, discovered in sundry propositions. The third ingredient, The satisfaction and pleasure which results, sta- ted and opened Chap. V. The relative consideration of these three ingredients of the saints' blessedness ; where it is propounded to show particularly, 1. What relation vision hath to assimilation. 2. What both these have to satisfaction. The relation be- tween the two former, inquired into. An entrance upon the much larger discourse, what relation and influence the two former have towards the third. What vision of God's face or glory con- tributes towards satisfaction, estimated from the consideration, 1. Of the object of the glory to be beheld; as 'tis divine, entire, permanent, appro- priate Chap. VI. AVhat the vision of God's face contri- butes to the soul's satisfaction, estimated from the consideration of the act of vision itself. Wherein this pleasure surpasses that of st-i.se. A comparison pursued more at large, between this intuition and discourse, between it and faith. This intuition more absolutely considered : Its characters, and what they contribute to the satis- faction of the blessed soul : That it is, viz. effica- cious, comprehensive, fixed, appropriate. . . Chap. VII. Wherein assimilation (the likene.^s or glory of God impressed) contributes unto satis- faction ; where is particularly propounded to be shown. What pleasure it involves, what it dis- poses to : What it involves in the esse of it, what in the cogiiosci. 1. The pleasure of being like God discovered. 2. Showing concerning the image of God (generally considered) that it is the soul's health and soundness restored -, that it is a vital, an intimate, a connatural, a perfect image Chap. VIII. The satisfaction carried in the glory of God impressed, further shown by instances. Certain particulars of this: impression instanced in a dependent frame of spirit, subjection or self- devoting^ love, purity, liberty, tranquillity. . . 204 308 211 214 CONTENTS, 221 Chap. IX. The pleasure arising from knowing or considering ourselves to be like God: from con- sidering it, 1. Absolutely, 2. Comparatively, or respectively: To the former state of the soul, To the state of lost souls, To its pattern, To the way of accomplishment. To the soul's own ex- pectations. To what it secures. The pleasure whereto it disposes, of union, communion. A comparison of this righteousness, with this bless- edness 218 Chap. X. The season of this satisfaction, which is two-fold; at death, and at the resurrection. The former spoken to ; wherein is shown. That this life is to the soul (even of a saint) but as a sleep : That at death it awakes. As to the latter; That there is a considerable accession to its hap- piness at the resurrection Chap. XI. An introduction to the use of the doc- trine liitherto proposed. The use divided into Inferences of truth. Rules of duty. 1. Infe- rence, That blessedness consists not in any sen- sual enjoyment. 2. Inference, The spirit of man (since 'tis capable of so high a blessedness) is a being of high excellency 224 Chap. XII. Inference 3. That a change of heart is ncces-^ary to this blessedness. The pretences of ungodly men, whereby they would avoid the necessity of this change. Five considerations proposed in order to the detecting the vanity of such pretences. A particular discussion and re- futation of those pretences 227 Chap. XIII. Fourth Inference, That the soul in which such a change is wrought, restlessly pur- sues this blessedness till it be attained. Fifth Inference. That the knowing of God, and con- formity to him, are satislying things, and do now in a degree satisfy, according to the measure wherein they are attained. Sixih Inference, That the love of God towards his people is great, that hath designed for them so great, and even a satis- fying good 233 Chap. XIV. 7. Inference. That since this bless- edness is limited to a qualified subject, " I in righteousness," the unrighteous are necessarily left excluded. 8. Inference. That righte.ousness is no vain thing, inasmuch as it hath so happy an issue, and ends so well 235 Chap. XV. Two other inferences, from the con- sideration of the season of this blessedness : The former, that inasmuch as this blessedness is not attained in this life, the present happiness of saints must in a great part consist in hope. The latter, that great is the wisdom and sagacity of the righteous man, which waves a present tempo- rary happiness, and chooses that which is distant and future 238 Chap. XVI. The second general head of the im- provement or use of the doctrine propounded from the text, containing certa in rules or prescrip- tions of duty connatural thereto. 1. "I'hat we settle in our minds the true notion of this blessed- ness. 2. That we compare the temper of our own spirits with it, and labour thence to discern ' whethf. r we may lay claim to it or no. ... 240 Chap. XVII. Rule 3. Directing such as upon in- quiry find, or see cause to suspect, a total aver- sation in themselves to this blessedness, to be speedy and restless in their endeavours to have the temper of their spirits altered and made suit- able to it. Doubts and objections concerning the use of such endeavours, in such a case, an- swered. Some considerations to enforce this di- rection propounded and pressed 244 Chap. XVIII. Rule 4. Directing to t\\e endea- vour of a gradual improvement in such a dispo- sedness of spirit (as shall be found in any mea- sure already attained) towards this blessedness. That 'tis blessedness begun which disposes to the consummate state of it. That we are therefore to endeavour the daily increase of our pnsent knowledge of God, conformity to him, and the satisfiedncss of our spirits therein 250 Chap. XIX. Rule 5. Directing to raise our de- sires above the actual or possible attainments of this our present, and terminate them upon the fu- ture consummate state of blessedness. The rule explained and pressed by sundry considerations. Rule 6. That wc add to a desirous pursuit, a joyful expectation of this blessedness, which is pursued in certain subordinate directions. . . 257 Chap. XX. The addition of two rules, that more specially respect the yet future season of this blessedness, after this life ; viz. Rule 7. That we patiently wait for it until death. Rule 8. That we love not too mitch this present life. . . . 262 The Vanity of this mortal life : or, of Man, con- sidered in his present Mortal State. — Psalm Ixxxix. 47, 48. Remeviber how short my time is : wherefore hast thou made all men in vain. What man is he that liveth, and shall not see death? Shall he deliver his soul from the hand of the grave 7 Selah 273 A Discourse relating to the expectation of future Blessedness. — Hebrews x. 3G. f'or ye hare %ccd of patience, that, after ye have done the wilt of God, ye might receive the promise 202 An Appendix, containing some memorial of Dr. Henry Sampson, a late noted Physici.an in the City of London 303 305 The worthy Dr. Grew's Account of this his excel- lent Brother-in-law A Discourse concerning the Redeemer's Dominion over the Invisible World, and the entrance thereinto by death. Some part whereof was preached on occasion of the Deaid do you hurt, and consume you, after tlvat he hath done you good 741 Serm. XIII. The Wicked turned into Hell.-Psalm ix. 17. The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations tliat forget God 746 Sermons : I. On the Gospel recommending itself to every Man's Conscience. Seven Sermons from 2 Cor. iv. 2. But }.ave renounced the hidden things of dishonesty , not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceit fully ; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God 757 II. They to whom the Gospel is hid, are lost souls. Six Sermons, from 2 Cor. iv. 3. But if our Gos- pel bs hid, it is hid to them that are lost 780 III. On Hope. Fourteen Sermons, from Rom. viii. 24. For we are saved by hope ; hut hope that is seen is not hope : for what a man seeth, ichy doth he yet hope for? , 800 IV. Friendship with God. Ten Sermon.s, from James ii. 23. And the scripture was fulfiUed which saith, Abraham believed God, and it ivas im- puted unto him for righteousness : and he was call- ed the friend of God 851 V. On Regeneration. Thirteen Sermons, from 1 John V. 1. llTiosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God : and every one that loveth him tluat begat, loveth him also that is begotl-en of him 8S"2 A Sermon directing what we are to do, after a strict Inquiry, whether or no we truly love God. — John v. 42. But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you 922 A Sermon on the Thanksgiving-day, Dec. 2, 1697. — Psalm xxix. 1. The Lord will bless his people with peace 925 A Sermon for the Reformation of Manners. — 5 CONTENTS. Rom. xui. 4. For he is the minister of God to thee for good A Two-fold Discourse. I. Of Man's Enmity against God. II. Of Reconciliation between God and Man.— Col. i. 21. And yau, that were smietirrie alievMted and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled A Sermon preached on the Fifth of November, 1703.— Col. i. 13. Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the king- dom of his dear Son FcNERdL Sermons. A Funeral Sermon for that faithful and laborious Servant of Christ, Mr. Richard Fairclough, who deceased July 4, 168-2, in the 61st year of his a^e. — Matt. xxv. 21. His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant ; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things : enter thou into the joy of thy lord A Sermon on the much-lamented Death of that reverend and worthy Servant of Christ, Mr. Ri- chard Adams, M. A. sometime Fellow of Brazen- nose College in Oxford, afterwards Minister of St. Mildred, Bread-street, London, more lately Pastor of a Congregation in Soiithwark, who de- ceased Feb. 7, 169'r-8.— Phil. i. 23. Having a desire to depart, and to be ivith Christ ; which is far better A Funeral Sermon for that excellent Minister of Christ, the trulv Rev. William Bates, D. D. who deceased July" 14, 1699.— John xi. 16. Then said Thomas, which is called Didymus, unto his fellow-disciples, Let us also go, that wc may die with him A Funeral Sermon for that very reverend and most laborious Servant of Christ, 'in the Work of the Ministry, Mr. Matthew Mead, who deceased Oct. 16, 1699.— 1 Tim. iv. 16. Thou shall both save thyself and the7n that hear thee A Funeral Sermon for that faithful, learned, and most worthy Minister of the Gospel, the Rev. Peter Vink, B. D. who deceased Sept. 6, 1702. — Acts V. 20. Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life A Funeral Sermon for Mrs. Esther Sampson. — Luke xiii. 16. And ought not this woman, being a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan hath bound, lo, these eighteen years, be loosed from this bond on the sabbath day ? A Discourse relating to the much-lamented Death and solemn Funeral of Clueen Mary. — Heb. xii. 23. A?id to the spirits of just men made perfect. A Funeral Sermon on the Death of Mrs. Margaret Baxter. — 2 Cor. v. 8. We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord A Funeral Sermon on the Death of Mrs. Judith Hammond. — 1 Cor. xv. 54. Death is swallowed up in victory 932 938 956 Howe. — 2 Tim. iii. 14. But continue thou in. the things which thou hast learned a'.id hast been assured of, knowing of whmn thou hast learned them 1040 965 973 978 The Principles cf the Oracles of God. Parts. In Two 996 1004 1012 1021 Letters Fragment of a Sermon Mr. Spademan's Funeral Sermon for Mr. John 6 1030 1036 1039 1049 1056 Part I. containing, I. An Introduction, proving the Necessity of their being taught, in Two Lectures, on Heb. v. 12. Ye have need that one teach you again, which be the first principles of the oracles of God. . . . II. The Existence of God, manifest from the Crea- tion, in Four Lectures, on Rom. i. 20. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead ; so that they are without excuse. . . III. The Divine Authority of the Scriptures, in Four Lectures, on 2 Tim. iii. 16. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God 10(>9 IV. The Unity of the Godhead, in Two Lectures, on James ii. 19. Thou believest that there is one God ; thou doest well : the devils also believe^ and tremble ... 1085 V. The Trinity of Persons in the Divine Essence, in Four Lectures, on 1 John v. 7. For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghoso: and these three are or^ 1091 VI. The Attributes and Perfections of the Divine Being, in Nine Lectures, on Matt. v. 48. Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect 1103 Part II. containing, I. The Decrees or Counsels of God, in Eight Lectures, on Ephes. i. 11. In whom also we havs obtained an inheritance, being predestinated ac- cording to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will. . . . 1133 II. God's Work of Creation, in Seven Lectures, on Heb. xi. 3. Through faith we understand that the worlds v-ere framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen %oere not made of things which do appear 1158 III. God's Creation of Man, in Three Lectures, on Gen. i. 27. So God created man in his own image ; in the image of God created he him. . 1 177 IV. The Fall of the First Man, and the Fallen State of Man, with the Death and Misery conse- quent on each of them, in Fourteen Lectures, on Rom. v. 12. Wherefore, as by one man sin enter- ed into the world, and death by sin ; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned. . 1192 V. The Justice and Righteousness of God vindica- ted, as to all Men's coming into the World with depraved Natures, in Eight Lectures, on Psalm li. 4, 5. Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight : that thou mightesl be justified v;hen thou speakest, and be clear jchen thou judgest. Behold, I icas shapen in iniquity ; and in sin did my mother conceive me. . . . 1233 VI. The General and Special Grace of God, in order to the Recovery of Apostate Souls, in Three Lectures, on Luke ii. 14. Good will towards men , 1255 THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE The lives of persons of worth and eminence, when drawn up with faithfulness and care, have been ever thought very entertaining and improving; and where there has been no hope of recovering any exact account of one of a distinguished character, most people have rather chosen to have some short memorials of him, than that such particulars as might be retrieved, should be al- together buried in oblivion. It may be questioned whether any one now living is capable of doing complete justice to the memory of the truly reverend Mr. John Howe; though there is good reason to believe, that the number of those who would set a value upon an exact account of his significant life (could such a thing be compassed) is far from being small. The history of it could not have been drawn up to ad- vantage by any but himself, or one that had his personal direction and assistance ; or at least to Avhom he had given the free use of his papers, with a liberty of transcribing and inserting what might be likely to give entertainment to the curious and inquisitive : whereas it has unhappily fallen out, that he has been so far from leaving behind hiin any directions for such a purpose, or narrative of the most material passages of his life, or hints of what occur- red in his general and extensive conversation, or even committing his papers to the care of one that was fit to make use of them for the benefit of the public, that before his death he (as we shall hereafter see in the course of these memorials of him) destro)'^ed a number of writings, that might have afforded good materials towards the giving a true historical account of him to after ages. 'Tis not easy for us to judge what particular reasons he might have for this part of his conduct, and therefore it becomes us to be .sparing in our censures : and yet I must own I cannot see why we that are yet living should here- upon slight or throw away, or they that come after us bhould be deprived of, what is still preserved, and may be recovered. Most people, I doubt not, will readily conclude, that the world has this way lost what might have been of no small a Preface to !VIr. Chorlton's Funeral Sennoii for Mr Henry Newcome, use. But after all, partly from the memories of some to whom he was well known, and whom he admitted to free- dom in conversation ; and partly from some letters and pa- pers, copies whereof were carefully- preserved in the hands of his relations, friends, and acquaintance; and partly also from such hints and passages as he has left behind him in the many writings he has published, such frag- ments may be gathered up, as cannot, I think, but be agreeable to those to whom his memory is precious. And though in the memorials of him that are thus recovered, there will appear several gaps which could not be filled up ; yet are some of the papers and things preserved so significant and worthy of notice, that I cannot help ex- pecting to have a good number concurring with me in opinion, that it would be unhappy for them not to be put together, and preserved. It is no difficult thing to foresee that it will occasion no small regret, in some whose respect for the deceased rises high, to find the account given of one that was so eminent in his profession, and who would indeed have shined bright in any .station, is .so very defective and imperfect : and if it may contribute any thing to their satisfaction, the compiler of this life is free to own, he should have been heartily glad to have been in a capacity of drawing it up in such a manner as the subject deserved. He himself had that knowledge of Mr. Howe, that he can readily say of him, as he did of the celebrated Mr. Newcome of Man- chester, that " they that knew him best, could know but a small part of his true and great worth, and might ahvays apprehend when they knew most of him, there was still much more that they knew not."" He laments he could not be better furnished with materials in this underta- king, to which he was encouraged, and in which he was assisted by many. And yet having been at considera- ble pains, in collecting and putting together what is here offered to public view, thinks he may be allowed to hope, that such defects as are ohserved will be easily overlooked, because he can with safety say, it would have been no small pleasure to him to have been able to have supplied them; and that any mistakes he may have run into will be readily pardoned, because he THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. would gladly have avoided them, had he but known how. And if it should so happen, that any into whose hands these papers fall, should find some things represented in a manner that may not be suited to their particular gust, they are desired to consider, that the compiler acted but the part of an historian, upon the best informations he could get, which he would not have regarded, if he had not thought them fairly credible ; but if any are furnished with better accounts, and better vouchers, he not only can readily submit, but shall be glad to be favoured with their intelligence. To begin, then, with the first appearance of this great man upon this earthly stage, our Mr. John Howe was born May 17, 1630, the 29th day of which month was re- markable for the nativity of kmg Charles II. and which very year, a few months after, gave birth to that excel- lent person, Archbishop Tillotson, whhwhom Mr. Howe, in his after-life, had a particular intimacy, and uncom- mon freedom. The place of his birth was Loughbo- rough, a noted market town, in the county of Leicester ; of which town his father was for some time the worthy minister. I have heard his father commended as a per- son of singular piety and probity ; and his mother as a woman of distinguished sense. The father and this son of his, were not the only ministers of the family. For there was one Mr. Obadiah Howe, vicar of Boston, in Lincolnshire, who upon several occasions appeared in print, and died in 1682,b who was our Mr. John Howe's uncle. There was also one Mr. William Howe, of Gedney, in the same coimty, that was (I suppose) of the family, though I cannot be positive how related to him. As to the father of our Mr. Howe, he was settled in the parish of Loughborough by Archbishop Laud, and afterwards thrust out by the same hand, on the account of his siding with the puritans, contrary to the expecta- tion of his promoter. He was one of those who could not be satisfied to give in to that nice and punctilious conformity, upon which that prelate laid so great a stress; and therefore it was not thought fit to suffer him to continue in the exercise of his ministry in that popu- lous town. Great was the rigour that was at that time used in the ecclesiastical courts, by which, as several were driven into America, and others into Holland, and other foreign parts, so was this worthy person from whom Mr. John Howe immediately descended, driven into Ireland, whither he took this his son (then very young) along with him. While they continued in that country, that execrable rebellion broke out, in which so many thousands of the poor protestanls, who were alto- gether unprovided, were so miserably butchered, and a great number of flourishing families ruined and undone, by the enraged papists, whose very tenderest mercies were found to be cruelty. Both father and son were at that lime exposed to very threatening danger, the place to which they had retired being for several weeks to- gether besieged and a.ssaulted by the rebels, though without success. A very special providence did upon b Wood's Athon. Oxon. vol. ii. p. 718. c Atb. Oxon. vol. ii. p. 1014. d Fasti O.xon. p. 750. this occasion guard that life, which was afterwards made so serviceable to great and considerable purposes. Being driven from thence by the war, which continued for some years, the father returned back into his native country, and settled in the county palatine of Lancaster; and there it was that our Mr. Howe went through the first rudiments of learning, and was trained up in the know- ledge of the tongues, though I have not been able to get any certain information who were his particular instruct- ors, nor any further notices relating to his infancy and childhood. He was sent pretty early (I cannot say exactly in what year) to Christ College, in Cambridge, where falling among such persons as Dr. Henry More, and Dr. Cud- worth, of both whom he was a great admirer, I think it is not to be wondered at, that in his early days he received that Platonic tincture, which so remarkably runs through the writings which he drew up and published in his ad- vanced years. As for Dr. More, there was an intimacy between him and Mr. Howe, that continued till the Doc- tor's death; which being known to Dr. Davis of Heyden, (who had the most profoimd veneration imaginable for the Doctor,) he the more respected Mr. Howe upon that account. He continued at Cambridge till he took the degree of B. A. and then removed to Oxford. Mr. Wood, the antiquary, says that he was of Brazen-nose College, in Oxon, and Bible Clerk there in Michaelmas term, 1648,<= and that he there took his Bachelor's degree, Jan. 18, 1649.d It was a common thing then to take the same degree in both universities, and I suppose it is so to this day. He followed his studies close, and his great attainments in learning, joined with his exemplary piety, so recom- mended him, that he was at length duly elected Fellow of Magdalen College, (of which famous society he was a bright ornament,) after he had been made Demy by the parliament visitors. Mr. Wood mentioning this of the visitors, intends it I suppose as a reflection; but I must own that may have been the case, and yet there may be no just matter of reflection in it either on them or on him. Not on them, supposing the person in whose room he suc- ceeded deserved to be ejected ; nor on him, supposing he did nothing unbecoming to get into his place when he was ejected. He had several contemporaries in this college, that afterwards proved nonconformists, as Mr. Theophilus Gale, Mr. Thomas Danson, Mr. Samuel Blower, and Mr. John Spilsbury. Of the two first, Mr. Wood has given some account,* among the Oxford Writers; as I also have done, in my memoirs of those who were eject- ed for nonconformity :f but the two latter are wholly omitted by Mr. Wood, though they were both of them Oxonians, and both of them graduates, because they were not writers. Mr. Blower, who died pastor of a congregation of dissenters, in the town of Abingdon, in the county of Berks," was often used to say with plea- sure, when Mr. Howe was at any time spoken of in his e Athon. Oxon. vol. ii. p. G08, 1016. f Abridg. vol. ii. p. 64, 648. S Abridg. vol. ii. p. 542. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. company, that the}'' two were born in the same town, went to the same school, and were of the same colle^ in the university. And Mr. Spilsbury, who was eject- ed for nonconformity from Bromsgrove in Worcester- shire,ii was one with whom Mr. Howe kept up a most intimate and endearing correspondence by letter to his dying day. I might also mention two others, who were Fellows of the same college, who were ejected in 1G62, whom Mr. "Wood wholly overlooks, viz. Mr. George Por- teri and Mr. James Ashhurst,k who died at Newington Green, near London. It is true that they were neither of them writers, and yet they were both graduates, the former being B. D. and the latter M. A. and therefore some notice ought to have been taken of them in his Fasti. Such things as these make me apprehend that that author designedly omitted several of the noncon- formists, for fear their number should have appeared too large and considerable. The famous Dr. Thomas Goodwin was President of the college, at the same time that Mr. Howe and the others whom I have now mentioned were Fellows. He had a gathered church among the scholars of that house, and finding Mr. Howe, who had an established reputation among them, did not offer himself to join with them, he took an occasion to speak to him about it, when they two were by themselves, without any other company with them; and signified his surprise that one of his character for serious piety should not embrace such an opportunity of Christian fellowship, which might be likely to have many good consequences attending it. Mr. Howe, Avith great frankness, told him that the true and only reason why he had been so silent about that matter, was because he under- stood they laid a considerable stress among them, upon some distinguishing peculiarities, of which he had no fondness, though he could give others their liberty to take their own way, without censuring them, or having any unkind thoughts of them ; but that if they would admit him into their society upon catholic terms, he would readily become one of them. The Doctor em- braced him, and told him he would do it with all his heart; and that, to his knowledge, it would be much to the satisfaction and edification of all that were con- cerned : and he thereupon became a member of that society. It is with no small pleasure that I relate this passage, which is a proof that Dr. Goodwin was not so narrow and confined in his temper and principles as some people have represented him. Mr. Howe's promotion and reputation in the college, and through the university, added new spurs to his diligence and application, which was so great, that he furnished himself with a large fund of rational and theological learning, the fruits whereof were very con- spicuous in his following life. He took the degree of M. A. July 9, 1652 ;i Mr. Theophilus Gale, his fellow- collegiate, whom I was mentioning but now, having taken the very same degree but the month before. And by this time he had not only gone through a course of b Abriik. voL ii. e 772. i lb. p. 70. k lb. p. 71. 1 Fasti Oxon. p. 99. philosophy, conversed closely with the heathen moral- ists, read over the accounts we have remaining of pagan theology, the writings of the school-men, and several s)^stems and common-places of the reformers, and the divines that succeeded them, but (as he himself sig- nified to one from whom I had it) had thoroughly studied the sacred Scriptures, and from thence drawn up a body of divinity for himself and his own use, which he saw very little occasion afterwards to vary from, in compliance with the schemes of others. After his taking his last degree, Mr. Howe became a preacher, and was ordained by Mr. Charles Herle at his church of Winwick in Lancashire, which Mr. Wood says is one of the richest churches in the king- dom. This Mr. Herle was a very noted man in those times ; and upon the death of Dr. Twiss, was chosen prolocutor of the Assembly of Divines at Westminster. In his parish there were several chapelries, and the ministers that officiated in them assisted at Mr. Howe's ordination. And he would often say thai this Mr. Herle was a primitive bishop, and the assistants in his several chapels were his clergy ; and they joining in laying on hands upon him, he thought few in modem times had so truly primitive an ordination as he. And Mr. Howe always spoke of this Mr. Herle with a very great and particular respect. Some time after, by an unexpected conduct of Divine Providence, he was called to the stated exercise of his ministry in the town of Great Torrington, in the county of Devon. Dr. Walker^ tells us that this place is a sort of donative or curacy, belonging to Christ Church in Oxford, but deemed equivalent to one held by insti- tution. He says that Mr. Theophilus Powel was turned out here about 1646, and was succeeded by the famous independent Mr. Lewis Stukely ; and after him came Mr. Howe. He was but young at the time of his first settlement in that town, and j'et even there did he wonderfully fulfil his ministry, and his labours were blessed with great success. When he first came thither, several of the inhabitants were members of the congregational church at Biddeford, of which Mr. William Bartletn was pastor, who had been Mr. Howe's particular ac- quaintance at Oxford. Being weary of the fatigue of going five or six miles every sacrament day, and dis- posed to sit down under Mr. Howe's ministry, these people desired a dismission from the church at Bidde- ford, and Mr. Bartlet readily resigned them to Mr. Howe, in whom there was a general concurrence ; and he had a numerous auditor}', and a very flourishing Christian society under his pastoral care, and thought of no other than of living and dying with them. I shall not easily forget the account he once gave me in private conversation, of the great pains he took among them, without any help or assistance, on the public fasts, which in those days returned pretty fre- quentl}'', and were generally kept with very great so- lemnity. He told rne it was upon those occasions his common way to begin about nine in the morning, with m Attempt, part ii. p. 339. n See Abridg. vol. ii. p. SiO. IT THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. a prayer for about a quarter of an hour, in which he begged a blessing on the work of the day ; and after- wards read and expounded a chapter or psalm, in which he spent about three quarters; then prayed for about an hour, preached for another hour, and prayed for about half an hour. After this, he retired and took some little refreshment for about a quarter of an hour or more, (the people singing all the while,) and then came again into the pulpit, and prayed for another hour, and gave them another sermon of about an hour's length ; and so concluded the service of the day, at about four o'clock in the evening, with about half an hour or more in prayer: a sort of service that few could have gone through without inexpressible weariness both to themselves and their auditories ! But he had a strong head, a warm heart, and a good bodily consti- tution: and the more he spent himself in his Master's service, the more was he beloved by the inhabitants of his parish. While he continued his painful labours in this town, he kept up a good correspondence with the ministers in the neighbourhood, and all over the country, and was greatly esteemed: but there was a particular inti- macy between him and the famous Mr. George Hughes of Plymouth," who made a greater figure, and had a greater interest and influence, than most of the minis- ters in those parts ; and he was married to his daughter March 1, 1654. These two kept up a weekly mutual correspondence by Latin letters, and I have a memor- able passage to relate as to one of them. Mr. Howe happened to have a fire in his house at Torrington, which might have been ruinous to his family, if a vio- lent rain which fell just at that time had not con- tributed greatly to extinguish it. On that very day it so fell out that he received a letter from his father Hughes, which concluded with this prayer ; Sit ros cccli super habilaciduvi vestrum : Let the dew of hea- ven be upon your dwelling : which was a prayer, the Reasonableness of which for his children in the letter of it, the good man could not apprehend at the time of writing ; but they could not but affectionately remark it at the receipt of it. Some time after (I cannot with certainty say how long) Mr. Howe having occasion to take a journey to London, was detained there longer than he intended. He had the curiosity to go one Lord's day (and it was on the last that he designed to continue in town) to be an auditor at the chapel at Whitehall ; but I cannot meet with any one that can with certainty recollect who was to be that day the preacher. Cromwell, who generally had his eyes every where, spied out Mr. Howe in the audilor}-^, and knew him by his garb to be a country minister, and thought he discerned some- thing more than ordinary in his countenance, and sent a messenger to him to desire to .speak with him when the worship of God was over. Upon his coming to him, Cromwell requested him to preach before him the Lord's day following. Mr. Howe weis surprised with the unexpected motion, and modestly desired to be ex- o See Abridg. vol. ii. p. 23S, cused. Cromwell told him it was a vain thing to at- tempt to excuse himself, for that he would take no denial. Mr. Howe pleaded, that having despatched what business he had in town, he was tending home- wards, and could not be absent any longer without in- convenience. Cromwell inquired what great damage he was liable to sustain, by tarrying a little longer 1 Mr. Howe replied, that his people, that were very kind to him, would be uneasy, and think he neglected them, and slighted their respect. Cromwell promised to write to them himself, and to send down one to supply his place, and actually did so; and Mr. Howe staid and preached as he was desired; and when he had given him one sermon, Cromwell still pressed for a second and a third ; and at last, after a great deal of free con- versation in private, nothing would serve him (who could not bear to be contradicted, after he had once got the power into his hands) but he must have him to be his household chaplain, and he would take care his place should be supplied at Torrington, to the full satisfaction of the people. Mr. Howe did all that lay in his power to excuse himself and get off; but no denial would be admitted. And at length (though not without great reluctance) he was prevailed with to comply, and remove with his family to Whitehall, where several of his children were born: and in this difficult station he endeavoured to be faithful, and to keep a good conscience. And this I suppose is the time when, as Mr. Wood informs us,p he became Lec- turer of St. Margaret's church in Westminster. Certain it is, that he was then a celebrated preacher, and gene- rally respected ; and it has been observed by several, that there was hardly any man that was in an eminent public station in those critical times, and that Avas ad- mitted to the knowledge of so many secrets as he, that was so free from censure in the changes that afterwards succeeded. A plain argument of uncommon conduct and caution ! Never can I find him so much as charged, even by those that have been most forward to inveigh against a number of his contemporaries, with improving his interest in those who then had the management of affairs in their hands, either to the enriching himself, or the doing ill offices to others, though of known dif- fering sentiments. He readily embraced every occarsion that offered, of serving the interest of religion and learning, and opposing the errors and designs which at that time threatened both. Among many instances of his generous temper, I shall mention one, which was his seasonable service to Dr. Seth Ward, who was afterwards Bishop of Exeter, and Sarum, successively. The case in short was this. In 1657, that gentleman, who had succeeded Mr. John Greaves some time before as Astronomy professor in the university of Oxon, stood candidate for the principalship of Jesus college in the same university, upon the resignation of Dr. Michael Roberts. Dr. Ward had the majority of the Fellows for him ; but Mr. Francis Howell of Exeter college made an interest in the Protector Cromwell, and obtained p Athen. Oxon. vol. ii. p. 1014. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. his promise for the filling up that vacancy. Dr. Ward not knowing that matters had gone so far, was for making an interest in the Protector loo, and in order to it applied to Mr. Howe, who, without making great promises as to success, readily offered to introduce him to the Protector, and do him what service he was able. Having obtained an audience, and they three being together, Mr. Howe gave Cromwell a great character of Dr. Ward, with respect to his learning, and signified how ill it would sound, if a man of his known merit should be discountenanced; especially when he had the majority of the Fellows on his side. Cromwell replied, that Dr. Roberts having resigned his principalship into his hands, he had been informed that it was his right to fill up the vacancy ; and he had given his promise to Mr. Howell, and could not draw back. But immediately taking Mr. Howe aside, and discoursing him freely about Dr. Ward, and he telling him that in his apprehension it Avould be much for his honour to do something for the Doctor, and that he would thereby encourage men of merit and learning, he returned to Dr. Ward, who continued waiting, and told him that he found Mr. Howe to be much his friend, and was upon his report of him disposed to give him some tokens of his regard : and thereupon he pleasantly asked him what he thought the principalship of Jesus College might be worth 1 The Doctor freely told him what was the value of it according to common com- putation. And thereupon he gave the Doctor a promise, that he would allow him the sum that he mentioned annuall}''. This was at that time reckoned a seasonable kindness : and the Doctor expressed his grateful sense of it to Mr. Howe some time after, when upon the change of the times he became a greater man. There were many others to whom Mr. Howe was very serviceable while he continued at Whitehall : and never was he known to be backward to assist any of the royalists or episcopalians in distress, if they were but persons of real merit. He befriended several with his advice and interest upon their being obliged to ap- pear before the Triers, in order to the having their approbation before their being allowed to ofl[iciate in public as ministers. Among the rest that applied to him for advice upon that occasion, the celebrated Dr. Thomas Fuller, who is so well known by his punning writings, was one. That gentleman, who was gene- rally upon the merry pin, being to take his turn before these Triers, of whom he had a very formidable notion, thus accosted Mr. Howe, when he applied to him for advice. Sir, said he, you may observe I am a pretty corpulent man, and I am to go through a passage that is very straight, I beg you would be so kind as to give me a shove, and help me through. He freely gave him his advice, and he promised to follow it ; and when he appeared before them, and they proposed to him the usual question. Whether he had ever had any experience of a work of grace upon his heart 1 he gave this in for answer, that he could appeal to the Searcher of hearts, that he made conscience of his very thoughts ; with which answer they were satisfied, as indeed they well might. In short, so generous was Mr. Howe, in using his interest on the behalf of pej.sons of any worth that applied to him, that I have been informed Cromwell once freely told him, that he had obtamed many favours for others ; but, says he, I wonder Avhen the time is to come that you will move for any thing for yourself, oi j'our family. A plain argument that he took him for a very disinterested person, and as free from selfishness as he was from partiality. And here I know not how to forbear mentioning a passage that I had from Mr. Howe's own mouth, when I had the happiness of some hours' free conversation with him, without any interruption. I had heard from several, (and it had been confirmed to me by Mr. Jeremy White, who lived at Whitehall at the very same time with Mr. Howe,) that the notion of a par- ticular faith in prayer prevailed much in Cromwell's court; and that it was a common opinion among them, that such as were in a special manner favoured of God. when they offered up prayers and supplications to him for his mercies, either for themselves or others, often had such impressions made upon their minds and spirits by a divine hand, as signified to them, not only in the general that their prayers would be heard, and gra- ciously answered, but that the particular mercies that were sought for would be certainly bestowed; nay, and sometimes also intimated to them in what way and manner they would be afforded, and pointed out to them future events beforehand, which in reality is the same with inspiration. Having heard of mischief done by the prevalence of this notion, I took the opportunity that offered, when there was nothing to hinder the utmost freedom, to inquire of Mr. Howe what he had known about this matter, and what were his appre- hensions concerning itl He told me the prevalence of the notion that I mentioned at Whitehall, at the time when he lived there, was too notorious to be called in question ; and that not a little pains was taken to cul- tivate and support it; and that he once heard a sermon there, (from a person of note,) the avowed design of which was to maintain and defend it. He said, he was so fully convinced of the ill tendency of such a prin- ciple, that afler the hearing this sermon, he thought himself bound in conscience, when it came next to his turn to preach before Cromwell, to set himself indus- triously to oppose it, and to beat down that spiritual pride and confidence, which such fancied impulses and impressions were apt to produce and cherish. He told me, he observed that while he was in the pulpit Cromwell heard him with great attention, but would sometimes knit his brows, and discover great uneasi- ness. When the sermon was over, he told me a person of distinction came to him, and asked him if he knew what he had done ; and signified it to him as his ap- prehension that Cromwell would be so incensed upon that discourse, that he would find it very difficut ever to make his peace with him, or secure his favour for tht future. Mr. Howe replied, that he had but dischargea his conscience, and could leave the event with God He told me that he afterwards observed Cromwell was THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE, cooler in his carriage to him than before ; and some- times he thought he would have spoken to him of the matter, but he never did, and rather chose to forbear. He added, that he had a great deal of satisfaction in what he did in this case, both in the time of doing it, and ever afterwards, to the time of our conversing to- gether upon this subject. I well remember, that upon this occasion I begged of Mr. Howe a sight of the notes of this sermon of his upon a particular faith in prayer, if ever he could recover them, and he gave me a promise ; and when I reminded him of it some time after, he told me he had looked for the notes, but could not find them. And not long since I desired a search might be made for it, among the few notes of his that remain. And what could be found, though it is but a fragment, shall be added in the close of this account. Whilst he continued in Cromwell's family, he was often put upon secret services; but they were always honourable, and such as, according to the best of his judgment, might be to the benefit either of the public, or of particular persons. And when he was once en- gaged he used all the diligence, and secrecy, and des- patch, he was able. Once particularly I have been informed, he was sent by Oliver in haste, upon a cer- tain occaj^ion, to Oxford, to a meeting of ministers there, and he made such despatch, that though he rode by St. Giles's Church at twelve o'clock, he arrived at Oxford by a quarter after five. In short, he so behaved himself in this station, that he had the ill will of as few as any man, and the particular friendship of the great Dr. Wilkins, who was afterwards Bishop of Chester, and several others, wlio were great supports of real piety and goodness in those times, and afterwards eminent under the legal establishment. When Oliver died, his son Richard succeeded him as Protector, and Mr. Howe stood in the same relation to the son, as he had done to the father. He was still chaplain at court, when in October, 1G58, he met with the congregational brethren at the Savoy, at the time of their drawing up their Confession of faith, &c.■>,. having none but Thurlow to abet him; maintaining that the dissolving that parliament would be both his ruin and theirs ! Upon some further discourse on the same subject, Mr. Howe told my friend, that Fleetwood undertook with great solemnity, that if Richard would but comply with the proposal that was made him, the army should not do him the least damage. And he added, that when Fleetwood was afterwards put in mind of this, all the answer he returned was, that he thought he had had more interest in the army than he found he had. And Mr. Howe further added, that ac- cidentally meeting with Major-General Berry, who was in those times so active and busy, some time after the restoration, when he was but in very mean circum- stances, he very freely told him, with tears running down his cheeks, that if Richard had but at that time hanged up him, and nine or ten more, the nation might have been happy. But without applauding what w£is weak, or vindicating what was blameable, it becomes us to be sensible, that the great and infinitely wise God had purposes to serve, that were out of the reach of human foresight. When the army had got their will, and set Richard aside, they, as it was foreseen they would, soon fell themselves; and a way was made by Monk to bring things back into the old channel. Mr. Howe returned to his people at Torrington, and continued his labours among them till the restoration : at which time there was such a madness attending the universal joy, that it is a perfect wonder the nation ever in any measure re- covered it. The king being restored, made for some time more use than was usual of the lords-lieutenants and their deputies to keep the several counties of the kingdom in awe: many were made offenders for a word, and the most cautious preachers were accused and censured, if they were not intoxicated to the same degree with their neighbours. Among the rest, Mr. Howe, though as cautious as most men of giving dis- turbance to any, yet met with some trouble, in the year IGGO, a few months after the restoration, which appears to have been given him by persons that were desirous to do a pleasure to those who then had the ascendant. He was informed against by John Evans and William Morgan, as delivering somewhat that was seditious and even treasonable, in two sermons preached from Gal. vi. 7, 8. on Sep. 30, and Oct. 14. The inform- ation was given before Mr. Wellington the mayor, who took an engagement from Mr. Howe, and othf>rs on his behalf, for his appearance at the next sessions, to answer to that matter. Before that time, some of the deputy-lieutenants of the county (who were not willing the magistrates of the several corporations should be too powerful) sent word to the mayor that they could not be present at the appointed session, but desired to hear the matter at some other time, and pre- fixed a day for that purpose, to which the mayor accord- ingly adjourned the sessions in compliance with their desire. And whereas Mr. Howe in open court demanded the benefit of the statute of 1 Edw. VI. and I Eliz, to THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. vu purge himself by more evidences than the informers, the mayor administered an oath to one and twenty witnesses, who were judicious men, enjoining them on his majesty's behalf to declare the truth of the matter ; and they all clear- ed Mr. Howe from the guilt in the accusation, and the court accordingly discharged him. Some time after this, on November 24th, one of the constables of the town summoned the mayor to appear before the deputy-lieutenant, by a warrant, dated the 14th, which he had kept ten days by him ; and the same being signed by four gentlemen who had been in town the day that the warrant bore date, (which was the very day of the hearing,) and the sheriff's hand, who was not then in town, being also to the warrant, the mayor doubted whether the warrant was made by the gentlemen or not; and thereupon wrote to the sheriff, that in case he might not be excused from appearing, he would prepare for it, as far as would consist with his office and place : but the messenger not returning soon enough, (the summons being for Saturday, and the ap- pearance the Wednesday morning after,) the mayor gave another letter to the deputy-lieutenants to the same purpose, and they presently sent a party of horse for him, who carried him to Exon ; where appearing before the said deputy-lieutenants, they told him he had acted unwarrantably in the case of Mr. Howe, and committed him to the Marshalsea, where he paid three pounds for fees, and afterwards was bound over to ap- pear at the next assizes ; and when they came, this af- fair of Mr. Howe was heard at large before the judge, and the notes that were taken in short-hand by a hearer were read before him; and having heard them out, he said the charge was wholly bottomed upon a mistake, and cleared him. One of the accusers soon left the town, and was seen there no more; and the other cut his own throat, and was buried at a crossroad. It is observable that there were many things of this kind at that time in several parts of England, which seem to have been managed in concert, on purpose to make way for the celebrated Act of Uniformity ; as in the case of Mr. Andrew Parsons, of Wem, in Shropshire,-- Mr. John Sacheverel, of Wincaunton, in Somersetshire, = and divers others. When things were thought sufficiently prepared for it, at length, in 1663, the Act of Uniformity passed the two houses of parliament, though, as it was observed, (and it ought not to this da^^ to be forgotten,) with a very small majority in the House of Commons ; and it took place on August 24th, this year. Mr. Howe on that day preached two very affecting sermons to his people at Torringtoii, and his auditory were all in tears. He consulted his conscience, and could not be satisfied with the terms of conformity fixed by the law, some account of which he gave in his farewell sermons. He here- upon quitted his public station in the church, and be- came a silenced nonconformist : though how that church from which he was excluded, can be that truly primitive and apostolic church that it is represented, and yet exclude one of his latitude, remains to many t Soe CoafoimiBtB Fourth Plea for the NonconformiBts, p. 30, &c. to this day a mystery. I shall not easily forget what he himself has told me, viz. that the first time he accidentally fell into the company of his much valued friend Dr. Wilkins, after the affecting change which that act produced, (under the sad effects whereof many worthy persons are still groaning,) the Doctor in his usual way entering into a free and pleasant conversa- tion with him, told him that that act had had such con- sequences £is a little surprised him. Some, he said, that he should have thought much too stiff and rigid ever to have fallen in with the establishment, had complied and conformed, while others that he thought had a suf- ficient latitude to have conformed, had stood out and continued nonconformists : and he intimated to Mr. Howe that he took him for one of the latter sort, and should therefore be glad to know the reasons of his conduct. Mr. Howe very frankly told him, that he had weighed that matter with all the impartiality he was able, and had not so slender a concern for his own use- fulness and comfort, as not to have been willing and desirous to have been under the establishment, could he but have compassed it with satisfaction to his. con- science : but that the giving him a particular account of the workings of his mind upon that occasion, (which he was free to do without any reserve, when a convenient opportunity offered,) would take up much more time than they then had to spend together ; and that so many things were necessarily to be touched upon in a discourse on that subject, that it was not pos- sible for it to be crowded into a transient conversa- tion, and therefore he should reserve it to a season, when having more time, he might have more scope for enlarging : but one thing, he added, he could tell him with assurance, which was this, that that lalicude of his, which he was pleased to take notice of, was so far from inducing him to conformity, that it was the very thing that made and kept him a nonconformist. The Doctor asked him whether it was the discipline of the church, that was the thing from whence he drew his chief ob- jection 1 To which Mr. Howe replied, that he could not by any means be fond of a church, that in reality had no discipline at all, and that he thought that a very considerable objection against the establishment. The Doctor told him, that though he was sensible there might not then be room for coming to a variety of par- ticulars, yet he should be glad of a general hint from him, about what was his great hinderance in the case, leaving the enlargement to a further opportunity, which he should readily embrace. Mr. Howe then went on, and intimated to him, that he took the public exercise of his ministry to be like a habitation or dwelling ; and that when he was put upon consulting about a dwelling, he could not tell how to reconcile it with common prudence, to enter into a habitation that he was apprehensive had so weak a foundation, as that it was not likely to stand very long. I could not, says he, by any means be for going into a falling house, for fear of its falling about my ears. Of this nature (said he) I take the present constitution to be, compared with that s See Abridgment, \i)l. ii. p. 587— «, THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE, flonrishins: state of real vital religion Mhicli I think I have suflicient warrant liom the word of God to expect and look for. To which the Doctor made this reply : I understand you well, and if that be your sense, take this advice from a friend ; don't think to gain any thing by sneaking or crouching, but bear up against us boldly and bravely ; stand to your principle, and sooner or later you may hope to carry your point. This Dr. Wilkins wa^ ever a great enemy to rigour and severity. When he was made a bishop by king Charles 11. (which was not compassed without con- siderable difficulty,) I have been credibly informed he waited on the famous Dr. Cosins, Bishop of Durham, among other spiritual lords, and desired his company at his consecration dinner. Upon this occasion Bishop Cosins entered into a free discourse with him, about mo- deration on the one hand, and a vigorous supporting the ecclesiastical constitution on the other. Bishop Wilkins frankly told his lordship, that for his part, it ■was his apprehension, that he who was by many (with ill nature enough) reflected on for his moderation, was in reality a better friend to the church than his lord- ship, who was for rigorously supporting the constitu- tion. Bishop Cosins seeming sui-prised. Bishop Wil- kins added this as the reason of his assertion : For while you, my lord, said he, are for setting the top on the piqued end, downwards, you won't be able to keep it up any longer than you continue whipping and scourg- ing; whereas I, says he, am for setting the broad end downward, and so it will stand of itself. 'Tis a pity this good bishop died so soon as 1672, and did not live till the revolution in 1688. What I have just been mentioning, of Mr. Howe's intimating to Dr. Wilkins, that he thought he had a scriptural warrant to expect and look for a more flourish- ing state of real vital religion than we were yet arrived at, very naturally reminds me of a passage I have heard of in conversation, at .some other time, between him and another great friend of his, viz. Dr. Henry More. That Doctor when he came to town, usually paid a visit to Mr. Howe, to whom he was always welcome. Calling once at his house, soon after his coming into the city, and not finding him at home, he left word he would come and dine with him the next day, which was Tuesday. Mr. Howe became that day an auditor at the lecture at St. Laurence's, hoping there to meet with his friend Dr. More, and bring him home along with him. It .so fell out that Dr. More being at that lecture, sat in the same seat with Dr. Sharp, who was afterwards Archbishop of York, who when sermon was over, asked him where he intended that day 40 dine. He told him he had promised to dine that day with Mr. Howe, whom he saw there present in another ■Dew. Dr. Sharp invited himself to dine with him too ; and the company of two such persons was highly pieasing to Mr. Howe, who was in his element when in the company of men of letters. After dinner, among other things tliat were freely discoursed of, they at t Spo T)r. Moif's Prophet icul Exhibition of the Bcveii Epistles, sent to the Bcvcn ChurcJics, cliap. 7. length came to talk of the Revelation of St. John, wliich was one of the Doctor's most common and favourite subjects. The Doctor, who was very fond of the notion, that the epistles to the seven Asian churches, which we meet with in that book, were prophetical, said, and repeated it over and over again, that he thought he had very good evidence to prove that we Avere now in the Sardian state ; with which Mr. Howe was not displeased, though Dr. Sharp seemed not much to relish it, thinking it no gi'eat compliment on the present ecclesiastical constitution. Being informed of this conversation, I took the pains to turn to Dr. More's works, to see what account he gives of the Sardian church; and I find in him these words, when he is giving a particular description of it : ' Though the Sardian church be well rid of the foul idolatries and gross trumperies of the papal church, yet her state as yet is but carnal. It is not the dispensation of the spirit of life, but the main stir is about external opinion and ceremony.'t And he adds a little after : ' As mis- chievous a mark as any of her carnality, is her dissen- sion and schismaticalness, even to mutual persecution ; as also the unnatural and unchristian wars of one part of reformed Christendom against the other.' So that Mr. Howe was not singular in his .sentiments, in firmly expecting that a much more flourishing state of religion would in time take place, than that which was brought in by the Act of Uniformity, in which so many were for acquiescing, without advancing so much as a step further, for fear of I know not what ill consequences that might ensue. But as to him, he had a large soul, and could not bear the thoughts of being cramped and pinioned. He was for the 'union and communion of all visible Christians ; and for making nothing necessary to Christian communion, but what Christ hath made necessary, or what is indeed necessary to one's being a Christian.' And he was convinced that 'such an imioQ must be effected, not by mere htunan endeavour, but by an almighty Spirit poured forth, which (says he) after we have suffered awhile, shall Karapriaai, put us into joint, and make every joint know its place in the body, (1 Pet. v. 10.) shall conquer private interests and inclinations, and overawe men's hearts, by the authority of the divine law, which now, how express soever it is, little availeth against such prepossessions. Till then (he says) Christianity will be among us a lan- guishing, withering thing. When the season comes of such an effusion of the Spirit from on high, there will be no parties. And amidst the wilderness desolation that cannot but be till that season comes, it matters little, and signifies to me (says he) scarce one straw, what party of us is uppermost. The most righteous, as they may be vogued, will be but as briars and scratching thorns; and it is better to suffer by such, than be of them.'" I cannot help saying, that it could never be for the credit of any church, to exclude one of such a make and spirit out of its enclosure. However, being ejected and silenced, Mr, Howe u See Mr. Howe's Funeral Sermon for Mr. Mead, p. 994, 996. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. continued for some time in the county of Devon, preaching in private houses, among his friends and ac- quaintance, as he had opportunity. Having preached at the house of a certain gentleman in those parts, and spent some few days with him, he at his return home, was told that an officer belonging to the Bishop's court had been to inquire after him, and left word that there was a citation out, both against him, and the gentle- man at whose house he had preached. Hereupon, he the very next morning took his horse, and rode to Exeter, and lighting at the inn there which he usually called at, he stood awhile at the gate, considering which way he had best to steer his course. While he stood musing, a certain dignified clergyman, with ■whom he wa^ well acquainted, happening to pass by, looked on him with some surprise, and saluted him with this question, Mr. Howe, what do you do here? to whom he replied, with another question ; Pray, sir, what have I done, that I may not be here 1 Upon which he told him that there was a process out against him, and that being so well known as he was, he did not at all question but that if he did not take care of himself, he would be taken up in a very little time. Among other discourse that passed, he asked him whether he would not go and wait upon the bishop 1 Ele said, he thought not to do it, unless his lordship hearing of his being in that city, should think fit to invite him. Upon this, he advised him to call for a room, and wait there a little, and told him he would go to the bishop, and let him know that he was there, and return to him again, and give him an account, what his lordship said to it. He accordingly left him, and soon returned, and brought him an invitation from the bishop, who signified he would be glad to see him. Waiting on his lordship, he received him with great civility, as his old acquaintance. The bishop presently fell to expostulating with him about his nonconformity. Mr. Howe told his lordship, he could not have time, without greatly trespassing upon his patience, to go through the several objections which he had to make against the terms of conformity. The bishop pressed him to name any one that he reckoned to be of weight. He thereupon instanced in the point of re-ordination. Why, pray sir, said the bishop to him, what hurt is there in being twice ordained 1 Hurt, my lord, says Mr. Howe to him ; the thought is shocking ; it hurts my understanding ; it is an absurdity : for nothing can have two beginnings. I am sure, said he, I am a minister of Christ, and am ready to debate that matter with your lordship, if you please; and I can't begin again to be a minister. The bishop then dropping that matter, told Mr. Howe, as he had done at other times, that if he would come in amongst them, he might have considerable preferments, and at length dismissed him in a very friendly manner. And as his lordship did not take the least notice to him of the process that was issued out against him, so neither did he say any thing of it to his lordship : but taking his le-ave, he mounted w This matter was strenuously and solemnh' argued upon, a great many years after, bj- the managers for tlie House of Commons, in tha trial of Dr. Henrj- Jsacneverel. his horse and rode home, and heard no more of that matter, either with respect to the gentleman, or himself. In 1665, when the dissenting ministers had been three years silenced, they were not a little perplexed in all parts of the kingdom, by the act that passed in the parliament at Oxford, by which they were obliged (under the penalty of not being allowed, unless upon the road, to come within five miles of any city, or cor- poration, or any place that sent burgesses to parliament, or any place where they had been ministers, or had preached after the Act of Oblivion) to swear, ' that it was not lawful, upon any pretence whatsoever,-' to take arms against the king, and that they abhorred the traitor- ous position, of taking arms by his authority against his person, or against those commissionated by him, in pursuance of such commission : and that they would not at any time endeavour any alteration of the govern- ment either in church or state.' They were much divided in their sentiments upon this occasion. There were several among them, who reckoned this oath so insnaring, that they durst not take it: but it was at length taken in London by Dr. Bates, and others to the number of twenty.^ It was also taken in Devonshire by Mr. Howe and others, to the number of twelve ; and by some few in Dorsetshire. The twelve who took this oath in Devonshire, were (as I am informed from a manuscript of Mr. Cluick's) Mr. Humphrey Saunders, Mr. John Howe, Mr. Gunnery, Mr. Mortimer, Mr. Parre, Mr. Francis Whiddon, Mr. Fairant, Mr. Wilkins, Mr. Einmore, Mr. Berry, Mr. Cleveland, and Mr. Bayly. The two last took it voluntarily, before it came in force. The other ten took it at the county sessions, after the taking place of the act. At their appearance for that purpose, one of the company (I find not who) made a declaration in open court, in these words : ' I confess I have had some doubts concerning this oath ; but understanding, partly by discourse about it with some who concurred in making of the law, and partly by consideration of the law itself, and other laws, that the oath hath no other meaning or end, than to secure the person of the king's majesty, and his autho- rity, whether in his person or commissioners, and the government in church and state, from being shaken or subverted, by any unpeaceable or seditious endeavours out of our place and calling, I am abundantly satisfied to tender myself to this honourable court, for the taking of it.' This declaration being candidly accepted by the court, the ten before mentioned immediateh' took the oath. Only Mr. Fairant and Mr. Wilkins took it with this addition, ' so far as the laws of man are agreeable to the word of God.' But as to Mr. Howe, he upon this occasion drew up the following paper, which gives an account of the principles upon which he took the oath that was then imposed ; and at the same time states the matter of oaths in general, as judiciously and fully, a.s can X Soo Abridgment of Mr. Baxter's Life, vol. i. p. 313, THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. ■well be supposed or imagined in so narrow a com- pass. '1. My swearing is my act. 2. The obligation I .lereby contract is x-oluntary. 3. Swearing in a form of woids prescribed by another, I adopt those words, and make them my own. 4. Being now so adopted, their first use is to express the true sense of my heart, touching the matter about which I swear. 5. Their next use, as they have now the form of an oath, is to assure him or them who duly require it from me, that what I express by them is the true sense of my heart. 6. 'Tis repugnant to both those ends, that they should be construed (as now used by me) to signify another thing than what I sincerely intend to make known by them. 7. If the words be of dubious signification, capable of more senses than one, I ought not to hide the sense in which I take them, but declare it, lest I deceive them whom I should satisfy. 8. That declara- tion I ought to make, if I have opportunity, to them whose satisfaction is primarily intended by the oath ; if not, to them whom they intrust and employ. 9. This declared sense must be such as the words will fairly bear, without force or violence.' I have been told, that in this year 1665, Mr. Howe wa.s imprisoned for two months in the Isle of St. Nicolas, which was the place where his father-in-law Mr. George Hughes, and his brother Mr. Obadiah Hughes, had been confined for a longer time : but the occasion of this imprisonment, what was alleged to justify it, and how he obtained deliverance, I have not been able to discover. In a letter he wrote to his brother-in-law Mr. Obadiah Hughes, after they were set at liberty, he expressed him- self thus : ' Blessed be God, that we can have, and hear of, each other's occasions of thanksgiving, that we may join praises as well as prayers, which I hope is done daily for one another. Nearer approaches, and constant adherence to God, with the improvement of our interest in each other's heart, must compensate (and I hope will abundantly) the unkindness and instability of a surly treacherous world, that we see still retains its wayward temper, and grows more peevish as it grows older, and more ingenious in in\'enting ways to torment whom it disaffects. It was, it seems, not enough to kill by one single death, but when .that was almost done, to give leave and time to respire, to live again, at least in hope, that it might have the renewed pleasure of putting us to a further pain and torture in dying once more. Spite is natural to her. All her kindness is an artificial disguise ; a device to promote and serve the design of the former with the more efficacious and piercing malignity. But patience will elude the design, and blunt its sharpest edge. It is perfectly defeated when nothing is expected from it but mischief; for then the worst it can threaten finds us provided, and the best it can promise incredulous, and not apt to be imposed upon. This will make it at last despair and grow hopeless, when it finds that the more it goes about to y See Dr. More'a Life, by Mr. Rich. Ward, p. 21. mock and vex us, the more it teaches and instructs us ; and that as it is wickeder, we are wiser. If we cannot, God will outwit it, and carry us, I trust, safe through, to a better world, upon which we may terminate hopes that will never make us ashamed,' &c. He continued still in those western counties, and went much from one gentleman's house to another, and was ready wherever he came to do any service he was able ; and at length, in the year 1668, he was prevailed with to print a book which met with wonderful accept- ance in the world, and not undeservedly, if either the subject be considered, or the happy management of it. I remember it was a usual saying of Dr. Henry More, who has been already mentioned once and again, that ' if any man had but written, his works would best show to all intelligent readers what he was.'y Perhaps this is as true of Mr. Howe as of most men that ever appear- ed in print. For in some of his writings he has drawn his own very picture, without any disguise or artifice. The first thing of his that was published, was a ser- mon from Eccles. vii. 29. upon ' Man's Creation in an holy, but mutable State.' It is to be met with in the ' Morning Exercise methodized,' printed in 1660. But he at this time published a discourse entitled, The Blessedness of the Righteous, from Psal. xvii. 15. being, as I am informed, sermons preached while he was at Torrington: and this is a treatise that has been well received and greatly valued, by the most serious and judicious of all persuasions. There is something in the preface to this work, that I take to be extremely fine, and that should not be passed over lightly, according to the usual way for the generality of common readers. He there says of that discourse of his, ' That the design of it is wholly practical, and it hath little or nothing to do with disputation. If (says he) there be any whose business it is to promote a pri- vate divided interest, or who place the sum of their re- ligion in an inconsiderable and doubtful opinion, it doth not unhallow their altars, nor offer any affront to their idol. It intends no quarrel to any contending angry party ; but deals upon things, in the substance whereof Christians are at a professed agreement : and hath therefore the greater probability of doing good to some, without the ofience of any. 'Tis indeed equally matter of complaint and wonder, that men can find so much leisure, to avert from such things wherein there is so much both of delight and pleasure, unto what one would think should have little of temptation or allure- ment in it, contentious jangling. It might rather be thought, its visible fruits and tendencies should render it the most dreadful thing to every serious beholder. What tragedies hath it wrought in the Christian church ! Into how weak and languishing a condition hath it brought the religion of professed Christians ! Hence have risen the intemperate preternatural heats and an- gers that have spent its strength and spirits ; and make it look with so meagre and pale a face. We have had a greater mind to dispute than live, and to contend THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. about what we know not, than to practise the far greater things we know, and which more directly tend to nourish and maintain the divine life. The author of that ingenious sentence, Pruritus disputandi scabies ecclesias, whoever he were, hath fitly expressed what is the noisome product of the itch of disputing. It hath begot the ulcerous tumours, which beside their own offensive soreness, drain the body, and turn what should nourish that into nutriment to themselves. And its effects are not more grievous, than the pleasures which it affects and pursues are uncouth and unnatural. The rough touch of an ingentle hand ; that only pleases which exasperates ; (as Seneca the moralist aptly expresses some like disaffection of diseased minds ; ) toil and vexation is their only delight ; and what to a sound spirit would be a pain, is to these a pleasure. ' Which is indeed the triumph of the disease, that it adds unto torment, reproach and mockery, and imposes upon men by so ridiculous a delusion, (while they are made to take pleasure m punishing themselves,) that even the most sober can scarcely look on in a fitter pos- ture than with a compassionate smile. All which were yet somewhat more tolerable, if that imagined vanish- ing pleasure were not the whole of their gain ; or if it were to be hoped that so great a present real pain and smart, should be recompensed with as real a consequent fruit and advantage. But we know that generally, by how much any thing is more disputable, the less it is necessary or conducible to the Christian life. God hath graciously provided, that what we are to live by, should not cost us so dear. And possibly as there is the less occasion of disputing about the more mo- mentous things of religion, so there may be somewhat more of modesty and awe, in reference to what is so confessedly venerable and sacred, (though too many are over-bold even here also,) than so foolishly trifle with such things. Therefore more commonly, where that humour prevails, men divert from those plainer things, with some slighter and more superficial rever- ence to them, but more heartily esteeming them in- sipid and jejune, because they have less in them to gratify their appetite, and betake themselves to such things about which they may more plausibly contend. And then what pitiful trifles often take up their time and thoughts ! questions and problems of like weighty importance (very often) with those which Seneca tells us this disease among the Greeks prompted them to trouble themselves about ! as, what number of rowers Ulysses had 1 which was written first, the Iliad or the Odysses? so that (as he saith) they spend their lives very operosely doing nothing : their conceits being such, that if they kept them to themselves they could yield them no fruit, and if they published them to others, they should not seem thereby the more learned, but the more troublesome. And is it not (says he) to be resented, that men should sell away the solid strength and vital joy, which a serious soul would find in substantial religion, for such toys 1 yea, and not only famish themselves, but trouble the world, and embroil the church with impertinencies 1 If a man be drawn forth, to defend an important truth against an injurious zissault, it were treacherous self-love to purchase his own peace by declining it. Or if be did sometimes turn his thoughts to some of our petite questions, that with many are so hotly agitated, for re- creation sake, or to try his wit, and exercise his reason without stirring his passions, to the disturbance of others or himself; here an iimocent divertisement is the best purpose that things of that nature are capable of serving. But when contention becomes a man's element, and he cannot live out of that fire ; strains his wit, and racks his invention to find matter of quarrel ; is resolved nothing said or done by others shall please him, only because he means to please himself in dis- senting ; disputes only that he may dispute, and loves dissension for itself ; this is the unnatural humour that hath so unspeakably troubled the church, and debased religion, and filled men's souls with wind and vanity, yea with fire and fury. This hath made Christians gladiators, and the Christian world a clamorous theatre, while men have equally affected to contend, and to make ostentation of their ability to do so,' &c. Some time after this, he was earnestly invited by a person of considerable quality into Ireland, and had generous offers made him. He accepted the motion with the greater readiness, and looked upon it as the more providential, because by this time he was reduced to straits, and his circumstances were but low ; which is not at all to be wondered at, considering that he had for some years been out of any settled emplo}Tnent, and had but a small income, several in family, and a ge- nerous spirit of his own, which inclined him upon all occasions to make the best figure he was able. He set sail for Dublin (as I am informed) in the beginning of April, 1671. And here I have a memorable passage to relate, which I have from such hands, that I cannot question the truth of it. When he went for Ireland, taking his eldest son along with him, he was for em- barking at a town in Wales, the name of which my in- formant has forgotten, but I suppose it was Holy-head. The wind not ser^'ing to carry them off, they con- tinued there a Lord's day, and found a large parish church, in which prayers only were to be read as usually, but no preaching was expected. The com- pany that was with Mr. Howe and waited for a wind, were pretty numerous, and they were desirous to find out some private place by the sea-side, where he might preach to them. As they were walking along the sands in search of some such place, they met two men on horseback riding towards the town, who proved to be the parson of the parish and his clerk. The clerk was asked by one in the company whether his master preached that day"? No, said he, my master does not use to preach, he only reads prayers. Upon which it was farther inquired whether he thought his master would be willing to give leave to a minister that was in their company, who was going for Ireland, but wait- ing for a wind, to make use of his pnlpit that day in his room 1 He answered he believed very willingly. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. and they found it so, when the clerk had once made the rnotion to him. Hereupon Mr. Howe and the rest of them returned back to the town, and he preached that day twice to them in the church ; and in the afternoon the auditory was very large, and seemed to be not a little aflected with what was delivered. The wind not serving all the week following, the country all round those parts took notice that neither the vessel nor the minister were gone ; and therefore on the Lord's day after, they came flocking into the town, expecting he would preach that day also. There was a prodigious multitude gathered together ; and the parson, who had had no thoughts about the matter, nor made the least motion for any further assistance from the stranger, observing it, was in no small consternation. Preach himself he could not ; for he had not of a long time been used to it, and he was altogether unprovided ; and if he did not employ the stranger, it would lessen his reputation greatly : but then he did not know, whether as things stood, he could be able to prevail with him. However he sent his clerk to Mr. Howe, and begged he would come and preach again, for that otherwise he knew not what to do, the coimlry being come in from several miles round, in hope of hearing him. Mr. Howe having been much indisposed, was in bed, and in a great sweat, when he received the message, and that made him at first doubtful whether he had best venture to comply. But considering with himself that here was a plain call of Providence, and not knowing but much good might be done in such a place, where preaching was so uncommon a thing, and the people seemed so desirous of the word of God, he sent word he would do it ; and cooled himself with as much speed as he was able with safety, and cast himself upon God, and went and preached with great life and freedom: and he told my informant, that he never in all his life saw people more moved, or receive the word with greater pleasure. And he at the same time added these words, ' if my ministry was ever of any use, I think it must be then.' Very soon after, the vessel went off, and he found no ill effects or conseqxrences at all, of the pains he took in such circumstances. At length he had his whole family with him in Ire- land, where he lived as chaplain to the Lord Massarene in the parish of Antrim, and was received and treated with all imaginable respect. His great learning and Christian temper, (together with that lord's interest and influence,) procured him the particular friendship of the bishop of that diocese, who, (together with his metro- politan,) without demanding any conformit}', gave him fiee liberty to preach in the public church in that town, every Lord's day in the afternoon : and I have been informed that the archbishop in a pretty full meeting of the clergy, told them frankly, that he would have Mr. Howe have every pulpit (where he had any con- cern) open to him, in which he at any time was free to preach. And he manifested his truly peaceable and Christian spirit, both in. his preaching and conversation, and was useful to many. In the very year in which he settled here, he pub- lished a noble discourse upon ' The "Vanity of this mortal Life, or of Man considered only in this present mortal State,' from Psal. Ixxxi. 47, 48. which discourse is usually bound up with his 'Blessedness of the Right- eous.' There is an epistle before this sermon dated from Antrim in 1671, to John Upton, of Lupton in Devon, Esq. his kinsman, signifying that it was composed upon occasion of the death of Anthony Upton, son of the said John, who had lived between twenty and thirty }'^ears in Spain, and had promised to return home ; and being earnestly expected, a sudden disease in so few days landed him in another world, that the first notice his friends had of his death or sickness, was by the arrival of that vessel (clad in mourning attire) which brought over the deserted body to its native place of Lupton ; which providence was therefore the more affecting, because a meeting of the several branches of the family, who lived at distant places, having been appointed, the place and occasion and design of it was this way altered ; and no less than twenty, the brothers and sisters of the deceased, or their consorts, besides many nephews and nieces, and other relations, were brought together to the mournful solemnity of the in- terment. It has been the judgment of many, that this discourse is as noble a piece of true theological oratory, as can be easily met with. In 1674 he published his treatise of 'Delighting m God,' which was the substance of some sermons he had preached twenty years before to the people of Torring- ton, with some additions and enlargements. He de- dicated them to his old friends, the inhabitants of that town, by a masculine, but at the same time most tender and affectionate, epistle to them from Antrim, in which he gives such an account of himself, as may very well heighten our idea of him. Speaking of the sermons which he then published, he expresses himself in this glorious manner. ' They aim (says he) at the promoting of the same end, which the course of my poor labours among you did, (as he that knoweth all things knoweth,) the se- rious practice of the great things of religion, which are known, and least liable to question ; without designing to engage you to or against any party of them that differ about circumstantial matters. They tend to let you see, that formality in any way of religion, unac- companied with life, will not serve your turn, (as it will no man's,) than which there is nothing more empty, sapless, and void both of profit and delight. I have reflected and considered with some satisfaction, that this hath been my way, and the temper of my mind among you. Great reason I have to repent, that I have not with greater earnestness pressed upon you the known and important things wherein serious Christians do generally agree : but I repent not I have been so little engaged in the hot contests of our age, about the things wherein they differ. For as I pretend to little light in these things, (whence I could not have much confidence to fortify me to such an imdertaking,) so I must profess to have little inclina- tion to contend about matters of that kind. Nor yet THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. xm am I indifferent as to these smaller things, that I can- not discern to be in their own nature so. But though I cannot avoid to think that course right which I have deliberately chosen therein, I do yet esteem that but a small thing upon which to ground an opinion of my exceeding them that think otherwise, eis if I knew more than they. For I have often recounted thus seriously with myself, that of every differing party (in those cir- cumstantial matters) I do particularly know some per- sons by whom I find myself much excelled, in much greater things than is the matter of that difference. I cannot ('tis true) thereupon say and think every thing that they do ; which is impossible, since they differ from one another as well as me ; and I understand well there are other measures of truth, than this or that ex- cellent person's opinion: but I thereupon reckon I have little reason to be conceited of any advantage I have of such in point of knowledge ; (even as little as he would have, that can sing or play well on a lute, of him that knows how to command armies or govern a kingdom ;) and can with the less confidence differ from them, or contend with them. Being thereby, though I cannot find that I err in these matters, constrained to have some suspicion lest I do ; and to admit it possible enough, that some of them who differ from me, having much more light in greater matters, may have so in these also. Besides that I most seriously think, hu- milit}', charity, and patience would more contribute to the composing of these lesser differences, or to the good estate of the Christian interest under them, than the most fervent disputes and contestations. I have upon such considerations little concerned myself in contend- ing for one way or another, while I was among you; or in censuring such as have differed from me, in such notions and practices as might consist with our com- mon great end; or as imported not manifest hostility thereto: contenting myself to follow the course that to ray preponderating judgment seemed best, without stepping out of my way to jostle others. But I cannot be so patient of their practical disagreement (not only with all serious Christians, but even their own judg- meiits and consciences also) who have no delight in God, and who take no pleasure in the very substance of religion,' &c. We may from hence take our mea- sures of him both as a minister and a divine; and can hardly forbear making this reflection, that it would be an unspeakable happiness, did but such a spirit as this prevail more among all the parties into which we are divided. In 1675, upon the death of Dr. Lazanis Seaman, he had an invitation gi^sn him to comi and fix in London, by a part of his congregation, and was earnestly press- ed to accept of their call. There was some difference among them about tbe person in whom they should centre. Some were for Mr. Charnock, and others for Mr. Howe: and though they that wrote to him urged a variety of arguments and inducements, yet he could not so well judge of the mattcvs alleged at a distance; and was thereupon prevailed w/h to take a voyage in- to England, and make a visit at l ondon, that he might view and judge of things upon the spot. He upon this occasion, which created him a great many thoughts, and in which he looked seriously upwards for conduct, committed some hints to writing, which have been pre- served, and are here faithfully transcribed from an au- thentic copy. The paper is inscribed after this manner. Considerations avd Communings v:ith myself concervr- ing my present Journey, Dec. 20, 75. By Nighl on my Bed. ' L Cluaere ; Have I not an undue design or self-n- sped in it? ' 1 . I know well I ought not to have any design for myself, which admits not of subordination to the in- terest and honour of the great God, and my Redeemer, and which is not acmally so subordinated. '2. I understand the fearful evil and sinfulness of having such an undue design ; that it is idolatry, the taking another god, and making myself that god. '3. I find (through God's mercy) some sensible stir- rings of hatred and detestation, in my breast, of that wickedness, and a great apprehension of the loveliness and beauty of a state of pure entire devotedness to God in Christ, and of acting accordingly. '4. I have insisted on this chiefly in prayer to God, in reference to this business, ever since it was set on foot, that I might be sincere in it: and though I have earnestly begged light to guide me therein, so as that I might do that herein which in the substance of the thing is agreeable to the holy will of God, yet I have much more importimately prayed that I might be sin- cere in what I do, not only because I know God will pardon ignorance (unremedied by utmost endeavours) where he beholds sincerity, whereas he will never ac- cept the knowledge of our duty, nor the doing what is in substance our duty, if that right manner of doing it, or principle whence it is done, be wanting; but, also, from the higher esteem I have of sincerity, above all light and knowledge without it, and the greater excel- lence of the thing itself. ' 5. I have carefully examined what selfish respects I can have in this matter. Is it worldly emolument"? In this my heart acquits me in the sight of God. Is it that I affect to be upon a public stage, to be popular and applauded by men? To this I say, (L) That Mo verily believe, that I shall be lower in the eye and esteem of the people in London, when I come under their nearer view. I know myself incapable of pleasing their genius. I cannot contrive nor endure to preach with elaborate artifice. They will soon be wear}', when they hear nothing but plain discourses of such matters as are not new to them. Yea, and ministers that noAV judge of me by what I have written, (when matter and words were in some measure weighed,) will find mc, when 1 converse with them, slow to apprehend things, slow to express my own apprehensions, unready, entangled, and obscure in my apprehensions and ex- press' ms : so that all will soon say, this is not the man THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. we took him for. (2.) It displeases me not, that they should find and say this. I hope I should digest it well. (3.) I have found (blessed be God) that the applauses some have prudently given me in letters, (as I have received many of that strain, very many Ion" before this business, and that had no relation unto any such, that no eye hath ever since seen but my own,) an occasion and means to me of deep humiliation, when my own heart hath witnessed to me, my miserable penury, and that I am thought to be what I am not. (4.) So far as I can find, I do not deliberately covet or desire esteem but for my work's sake, and the success of my work. Of applause I have often found an inward abhorrence. I both know I have nothing but what I have received, and that I have received a great deal less than many think I have: which I say with re- flection on myself; not to diminish the bounty of the Free-giver, from whom I know I might have received much more, if I had sought and used his gifts aright. All the design I can more vehemently suspect myself of that looks like self-interest anyway, is, (1.) The im- provement of my own knowledge, which I know there may be great opportunities for, if this journey should issue in my settlement at London. (2.) The disposal of my children. Yet I hope these things are eyed in subordination, and indifferently, so as not to sway with me against my duty. ' n. Cluaere ; Have I not a previous resolution of settling at London before I go up? '1. I have a resolution to do what I shall conceive shall make most to the usefulness of the rest of my life, which resolution I ought never to be without. '2. I am seriously yet at a loss as to judging this case, whether in this country or there. '3. If I can find clearly it is my duty to return in order to continuance at Antrim, I shall do it with high complacency. III. Gluosre ; Am I not afraid of miscarrying in this undertaken voyage, by shipwreck, tJ'C. 7 ' 1. I find little of that fear, I bless God. '2. Nor is it that I think I have attained any emi- nent degree of grace, that I am not afflicted with that fear: nay more than that, I acknowledge, to be de- livered from such fear is itself a great mercy, and gracious vouchsafement. '3. I hope I am in a state of favour and acceptance with God, which I apprehend I owe to infinite rich mercy in the Redeemer's blood. Great forgiveness I need, for I am a miserable sinful wretch: this I trust I have upon gospel terms. ' 4. It is pleasant to me hereupon to think of going into eternity; of laying dowTi the body of flesh and sin and death together ; and of being perfectly holy, and associated with them that are so, in holy work and enjoyment. '5. To put off this tabernacle so easily, I reckon would to me be a merciful dispensation, who am more afraid of sharp pains than of death. I think I should joyfully embrace those waves that should cast me on an tmdesigned shore, and when I intended Liverpool, should land me in heaven. '6. Yet I bless God I have no weariness of life, nor of his work in this world, if he shall yet please further to employ me here. ' IV. Cluaere ; But am I not solicitous, lest if thib should prove the event, it will be judged a testimony against me, as to this present undertaking 7 ' 1. It is an honest design I go upon. I have, as I said, no selfish design that oversways me in it. I have no design to prejudice Mr. C . I believe I shall do him no actual prejudice. Wherein I can justly befriend him, I go resolved to do it. If I can do any thing for the holding of the remainder together, without the neglect of greater work, I do apprehend I shall do a just and needful thing : but should do nothing if I had opportunity, till I knew more. But, '2. To judge of the justice of a cause by the suc- cess, is a most imjust way of judging. Many a just business has miscarried. If I get well into the other world, such censures will be a small matter in my eye ; and they are not great now. '3. God will accept my sincere intentions, though I effect nothing. '4. My journey was to me absolutely necessary, who could without it neither grant nor deny. ' Consolations to my wife and other relatiojis, supposing they hear of my deaih. '1. Whom or what have you lostl A poor creature that could never be of much use to you. ' 2. You are to consider me, not as lost in my prime, but as now I am sensibly under great decays, and not likely to continue long, except some means hitherto not thought on should have been tried. What a summer had I of the last ! seldom able to walk the streets ; and not only often disabled by pain, but weakness. And what great advantage to you would it have been to see me die"? I know not when I have had so much ease and health as in this journey. '3. God not only hath determined the thing, we must die, but all circumstances, when and where, and after what manner, and all wisely and well. Why should you be grieved, that he hath done welll not only well in itself, but well for you, if you love him"? '4. You must ere long follow, and shall not be al- ways in this world without me. '5. What there is of evil in this case, admits of remedy. Draw so much nearer to God, and cease from man : mind heaven more, and your loss is made up. '6. I have, through the grace of God, preached immortal truth, which will survive, and may be to your advantage. '7. As to you who have dependance upon me for worldly concernments: I was never a good projector for the world; so the loss is not great. How many, dear to God, make a shift, in a worse condition I Forget not the motto, God will provide. He that feeds ravens. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE, and takes care of sparrows, will he not take care of you 1 are you of his family, and will he not take care of his own 1 instead of distrust and repining, give thanks, O bless him with all your soul, that he hath revealed and given himself to you for an everlasting portion ; and whose covenant is to be your God, and the Grod of yours, ' 8. Let it be some satisfaction to you, that I go willingly, under no dread, with no regret, but with some comfortable knowledge of my way and end.' With such thoughts and workings of mind as these, did he tmdertake and pursue his voyage and journey, and he arrived safe at London after having been five years in Ireland : and upon mature consideration, he accepted of the call that had been given him, and set- tled there, and made a quiet and peaceable use of King Charles's indulgence, preaching to a considerable and judicious auditory, by whom he was singularly re- spected ; and he was much esteemed, not only by his brethren in the ministry among the dissenters, but also by several eminent divines of the church of England, as Dr. Whitchcot, Dr. Kidder, Dr. Fowler, Dr. Lncas, and others, whom he often conversed with, and that with great freedom and familiarity. He was no sooner settled here, tnan he printed the first part of his ' Living Temple,' by which it was his design to improve that notion, that a good man is the Temple of God. This first part is upon God's exist- ence, and his conversableness with man ; and against Atheism, or the Epicurean deism. 'Tis dedicated to the Lord Viscount Massarene, governor of the county of London-Derr}^, and one of the lords of his majesty's most honourable privy-council in the kingdom of Ire- land : and he signifies to his lordship, that this tract was conceived under his roof, and born out of his house ; and that he therefore thought it decent and just, that it should openly own the relation which it thereby had, and the author's great obligations, to his lordship. In the year 1677, he published a tract, entitled, ' The Reconcileableness of God's Prescience of the Sins of Men wi'.h the Wisdom and Sincerity of his Counsels and Ex- hortations, and whatever other Means he uses to prevent them :' written by way of Letter to the Honourable Robert Boyle, Esq. This treatise was exceedingly admired by some, and as much opposed by others. Mr. Theophilus Gale, in particular, his old fellow-col- legiate, publishing about this time his fourth part of ' The Court of the Gentiles,' made some animadversions upon it.2 Whereupon Mr. Howe added a Postscript, in defence of the said Letter, in which he makes a re- turn to Mr. Gale's remarks. Mr. Danson also wrote against this tract, but I know not that Mr. Howe took any notice of him-, though the ingenious Andrew Marvel, Esq. made a very witty and entertaining re- ply to him. Upon the account of this performance of his, Mr. Wood represents Mr. Howe as a great and strict Arminian ;* but very wrongfully. For that which he mainly asserts in that discourse, is no more than z Seo Court of the Gentiles, part 1. page 522. this, that ' it is inconceivable, that the holy and good God should irresistibly determine the wills of men to and punish the same thing ; that h« should irresistibly determine the will of a man to the hatred of his own most blessed self, and then exact severest punishments for the oflTence done,' which the strictest Calvinist has not the least occasion (as far as I can perceive) to scru- ple to acknowledge. This notion widely difiers from asserting the blessed God imiversally to have left his reasonable creatures an indetermined power, with re- spect to all actions, good as well as evil, to the utter exclusion of efiicacious grace, in reference even to the best actions that are. 'Tis that that is tlie true Armi- nian principle, if we may be allowed to pass a judg- ment, from the works of the most eminent writers that are in that scheme. If all are great and strict Armini- ans, who cannot allow themselves to suppose the blessed God, by internal influence, to have a hand even in the worst and wickedest actions, as far as in the best, I am persuaded there will be very few remaining but what are such, either here at home, or in any of the reformed churches abroad. As to Mr. Howe, he was so well satisfied in the firmness of the grounds he went upon, that at last he did not stick to declare, that ' if he found himself any way obliged further to intermed- dle in this matter, he should reckon the time he had to spend in this world could never be spent to better pur- pose, than in discovering the fearful consequences of the opposite opinion, the vanity of the sitbtei-fuges whereby its assertors think to hide the malignitj' of it, and the inelficacy of the arguments brought for it.'k But this was what he had no occasion for, God had cut out other work for him. He went on quietly in a course of practical preaching in his slated ministry, and was very useful in forwarding many in their way to heaven. In the time of the popish plot, when things took a quite difierent turn from what they had done from the restoration till then, and the city and whole body of the nation was full of terror and melancholy apprehen- sions, he made it his endeavour among tliose with whom he had to do, to make the awful impressions which people were at that time under, serviceable to the pur- poses of serious religion : and in his conversation with the clergy of the established church, or with persons of quality and distinction, which was not unfrequent, he upon all occasions discovered a very peaceable and healing spirit, often giving it as his sense, that an ac- commodation of matters between the church and the dissenters, would be the most effectual waj' to keep out poper}^ And it has been the opinion of many, that a fitter season for a union could not well occur, than did then present itself. The House of Commons who sat at Westminster in 1680, seem to have been of that mind, and therefore they brought in a bill for uniting his majest5''s protestant subjects, and nothing was more commonh' talked of at that time. And not being able to go through with if, they, before they rose, came to a resolution, ' that the acts of parliament made in the a Allien. Oxon. vol. 2. page 1014. b Postscript, page 131. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. reigns of aueen Elizabeth and King James, against popish recusants, ought not to be extended against pro- testant dissenters : and that the prosecution of protest- ant dissenters, upon the penal laws, is at this time grievous to the subject, a weakening the protestant interest, an encouragement to popery, and dangerous to the peace of the kingdom.' Mr. Howe had about this time an invitation from Bishop Lloyd, to come and dine with him the next day. He was apprehensive it could not be without some particular design, that a bishop whom he had not seen, or at least with whom he had no acquaintance, should send to desire him to come and dine with him. He sent his lordship word, that he was engaged that day for dinner, (as he really was before the receipt of the message sent him,) but would not fail of waiting upon him afterwards. Hereupon the Bishop sent again, to let him know, that since he could not dine with him, he would not give him the trouble to come so far as his house, but would meet him at Dr. Tillotson's, the dean of Canterbury. They met there accordingly, and the Bishop told him that the reason why he de- sired a meeting with him, was to know of him, what he thought would satisfy the nonconformists, that so they might be taken into the church.'= Mr, Howe an- swered, that he could not pretend to say what would satisfy any besides himself; for that all had not an equal latitude in such matters. The Bishop hereupon pressed him to give his judgment, what he thought would satisfy the most; for, says he, I would have the terms so large as to comprehend the most of them. Mr. Howe told him, that he thought it would go a considerable way towards it, if the law was but so framed, as that ministers might be enabled to promote parochial reformation. Why, says the Bishop, for that reason, I am for taking the lay chancellors quite away, as being the great hinderance of reformation. At length,' they agreed upon a meeting the next night, at seven o'clock, at Dr. Stillingfleet's, the dean of St. Paul's. Mr. Howe proposed to bring Mr. Baxter along with him; but the Bishop would by no means allow of it. Then he proposed to bring Dr. Bates, and was an- swered, that no man could be more proper. Accord- ingly Dr. Bates and Mr. Howe went at seven in the evening to Dean Stillingfleet's, as had been appointed the day before. The Dean had provided a very hand- some treat, but they found not the company they ex- pected. They waited till eight, till nine, till near ten o'clock ; but the Bishop neither came, nor sent, nor took any notice of the matter afterwards. And that very night, as they heard the next morning, the bill of exclusion was thrown out of the House of Peers, by a majority of thirty voices, fourteen of which were bishops. And after this, there was no further occasion for any talk about a comprehension. For upon this turn of affairs, it is observed by a cele- brated writer on the church side, that ' the clergy struck up with zeal for the duke's succession: as if a popish c A copy of the ' Hcadg of a T?H1 for uniting his Majesty Protpstant Subjects ' which was agreed upon at a committee of the House of Commons Nov 18 1680, may be met with, Abndffment of Mr. Baxter's Life, vol. i. p. 350 ' ' king had been a special blessing from heaven, to be much longed for by the protestant church. They likewise gave themselves such a loose agamst the nonconform- ists, as if nothing was so formidable as that party. So that in all their sermons, popery was quite forgot, and the force of their zeal was turned almost wholly against the dissenters. 'd Amongst the rest, Dean Stillingfleet, from whom it was little expected, on the first day of Easter term, 1680, in a sermon before the lord mayor and aldermen of the city, the judges and Serjeants, from Phil. iii. 16. (which sermon he entitled, ' The Mis- chief of Separation,') took occasion to represent all the nonconformists as schismaticks, and inveigh against them as enemies to peace, and dangerous to the church, &c. This sermon was answered by Dr. Owen, Mr. Baxter, Mr. Alsop, Mr. Barret, and others ; and among the rest Mr. Howe made some remarks upon it, in a pamphlet, entitled, ' A Letter written out of the Country to a Person of quality in the City, who took oiTence at the late Sermon of Dr. Stillingfleet, Dean of St. Paul's, before the Lord Mayor;' which Letter was drawn up with great clearness and strength of reasoning. He therein shows how unreasonably the Doctor endeavours to keep the dissenters, who after the utmost search could not be satisfied to conform, in a state of danma- tion, for scrupMng the ceremonies; at least in a ne- glect of the necessary means of salvation. He shows his arguments, both ad rem, and adi hoviinem too, to be unconcluding ; reflects freely on the Doctor for his too great acrimony, and too little seriousness in his way of management; and yet closes with a very genteel and handsome address to such as were oflfended with the Doctor's sermon, to abate their indignation, and mo- derate their censures, and stir them up to turn their re- flections upon him, into serious prayers for him, for which he shows there weis very just occasion. The Doctor himself sticks not to own, that in this Letter he discourses gravely and piously, without bit- terness and rancour, or any sharp reflections, and some- times with a great mixture of kindness towards him, for which, and his prayers for him, he heartily thanks him.e This warm sermon of the Doctor's was gene- rally reckoned very ill-timed, to which it's not unlikel)' but Bishop Burnet may have a reference, when he says of the great man, that ' he went into the humours of the high sort of people, beyond what became him; per- haps beyond his own sense of things.'f Nor can I forbear to take notice of another sermon, that was preached this year (1680) at court, by Dean Tillotson, from Josh. xxiv. 15. entitled, ' The Protestant Religion vindicated from the charge of Singularity and Novelty.' In this sermon there is this notion; that no man is obliged to preach against the religion of a country, though a false one, imless he has a power of working miracles. King Charles slept most part of the time while the sermon was delivered ; and a certain nobleman stepped to him as soon as it was over, and said, 'Tis a pity your majesty slept; for we had the d Bishop Burnet's History of his own Times, vol. i. p. 501. e Preface to his ' Unreasonableness of Separation,' p. Ixi. Ixii. t History of his owti Times, vol. i. p. 1S9. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. rarest piece of Hobbism that ever you heard in )'our life. Ods fish, he shall print it then, says the king ; and immediately called the lord chamberlain, and gave him his command to the Dean to print his sermon. When it came from the press, the Dean sent it as a pre- sent to Mr. Howe, eis he usually did most of the things he printed. Mr. Howe immediately perused it, and ^vas not a little troubled, to find a notion there, that had so ill a tendency as that forementioned. Whereupon he drew up a long letter, in which he freely expostu- lated with the Dean, for giving such a wound to the Reformation ; signifying to him, that Luther and Calvin, and the rest of our blessed reformers, were (thanks be to God) of another mind. The Christian religion, (said he,) both as to its precepts and promises, is already con- firmed by miracles ; and must it be repealed, every time a wicked governor thinks fit to establish a false religion 1 must no one stand up for the true religion, till he can work a miracle 1 He signified to him, how much he was grieved, that in a sermon against popery, he should plead the popish cause against all the re- formers ; and insisted upon it, that we had incontest- able evidence of the miracles wrought by the apostles, and that we are bound to believe them, and take reli- gion to be established by them, without any further expectations, &c. Mr. Howe carried the letter him- self, and delivered it into the Dean's own hands ; and he taking a general and cursory view of it, signified his willingness to talk that whole matter freely over; but said, they could not be together where they were, without interruption, and therefore moved for a little journey into the coxmtry, that so they might have free- dom of discourse. They accordingly agreed to go and dine that day with the Lady Falconbridge at Sutton- Court, and Mr. Howe re d over the letter to the Dean, and enlarged upon the contents of it, as they were travelling along together in his chariot. The good man at length fell to weeping freely, and said that this was the most unhappy thing that had of a long time befallen him. I see (says he) what I have offered is not to be maintained. But he told him, that it was not his turn to preach as on that day. He that should have been the preacher being sick, the Dean said, he was sent to by the lord chamberlain to supply his place : and he added, that he had but little notice, and so con- sidered the general fears of popery, and this text oflTer- ed itself, and he thought the notion resulted from it ; and, says he, immediately after preaching, I received a command from the king, to print the sermon, and then it was not in my power to alter it. I am the better satisfied that there is no mistake as to the substance of this passage, because he from whom I had it, did not trust to his bare memory, but committed it to writing, presently after he received the account from Mr. Howe himself. And though such a story as this may make us sensible that the very best of men have their slips, yet am I far from thinking it a dishonour to this great man, to be open to conviction. In 1681 the dissenters were prosecuted with great g Hiatory of his own Times, vol. i. page 501. violence both in city and country, and the severe laws that had been made against them some years before, as well as some that were made against the papists in the reign of Q.ueen Elizabeth, were rigorously put in exe- cution against them, without any favour. Several of the bishops concurred, and by influence from court, were prevailed with to do their endeavour to push for- ward the civil magistrate, and to sharpen the rigour of the ecclesiastical courts, and that in defiance of the votes of the House of Commons in their favour. And as Bishop Burnet observes, ' such of the clergy as would not engage in the common fury, were cried out upon as the betrayers of the church, and as secret favourers of the dissenters.'? The author of 'the Complete History of England, 'h says, that ' this year there was a vigorous prosecution of the protestant dissenters, which was ge- nerally thought a piece of court-artifice, to play the church of England against the dissenters, and enrage the dissenters against the church of England, that they might not unite and see their common danger, but rather by destroying one another, might make room for a third party, that lay behind the curtain, and watched an opportunity of the duke's succession.' And at this juncture, Mr. Howe published a discourse of ' Thought- fulness for the Morrow, with an Appendix, concerning the immoderate Desire of foreknowing Things to come,' in 8vo. It is dedicated to the Lady Anne Wharton, of Upper Winchingdon in the county of Bucks, who had expressed a desire of seeing somewhat written on that subject. To which is added, ' A Discourse of Charity, in reference to other Men's Sins, from 1 Cor. xiii. 6.' He this year also published ' A Funeral Sermon on the Decease of Mrs. Margaret Baxter, who died June 28lh, from 2 Cor. v. 8.' In 1682 things were much in the same state as the year before. This year also Mr. Howe published se- veral little things ; as, ' A Discourse on the right Use of that Argument in Prayer, from the Name of God, on behalf of a People that profess it, from Jer. xiv. 21.' 8vo. ' A Discourse on Self-Dedication, at the Anniversary Thanksgiving of the Earl of Kildare, for a great Deli- verance,' in 12mo, and 'A Funeral Sermon for Mr, Richard Fairclough, \vho deceased July 4th, from Matt. XXV. 21.' And he now drew up those Armotations on the three Epistles of St. John, which are to be met with in the second volume, or continuation, of Mr. Pool. In 1683 there was a most cruel order made by the justices of peace at their quarter-sessions at Exon, against all nonconforming ntinisters, allowing a reward of forty shillings to any person that apprehended any oire of them, and declaring their resolution to put in execution against them the severest laws, and par- ticularly that of the 35th of Elizabeth, the penalties whereof are imprisonment, abjuration of the realm, or death. And Bishop Lamplugh (who was afterwards archbishop of York) required the order to be read by all the clergy on the next Sunday after it should be tendered to them, on purpose (as was said) ' that the care of the justices of Devon, for the preservation of h Vol. iii. page 403. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. the public peace, might be fuller known, and have a bet- ter effect.' The same year there was published in the ' Continua- tion of the Morning Exercise,' an excellent sermon of Mr. Howe's, from Col. ii. 2. upon this question, ' What may most hopefully be attempted, to allay animosities among protestants, that our divisions may not be our ruin V 'In order to this, he earnestly recommends to all the professors of religion, the maintaining of a sincere love to one another, and the improving of their faith to greater measures of clearness, certainty, and eflScacy, in reference to the substantials of Christianity. A generous love, not to Christians of this or that party or denomination only, but to all in whom the true essen- tials of Christianity are found, would (he says) greatly contribute to the vigour of the Christian life. It would inspire Christians generally with a sacred courage and fortitude, when they should know and even feel them- selves knit together in love. It would on the contrary extinguish or abate the unhallowed fire of our anger and wrath towards one another. It would oblige us to all acts of mutual kindness and friendship. Pre- judices would cease, and jealousies concerning each other, and a mutual confidence would be produced. It would make us earnestly covet an entire union in all the things wherein we differ, and contribute greatly to it. It would make us much more apt to yield to one another, and abate all that ever we can, in order to as full an accommodation as is any way possible ; that if we cannot agree upon either extreme, we might at last meet in the middle. It would make us abstain from mutual censures of one another as insincere for our re- maining differences ; and convince us that such cen- sures are very unreasonable, because all have not the same understanding, nor the same gust and relish of things. It would oblige us, after competent endea- vours of mutual satisfaction, about the matters wherein we differ, to forbear further urging of one another con- cerning them : and it would make us forbear reviling and exposing one another, and the industrious seeking one another's ruin. And then if, at the same time, we did but endeavour to have our souls possessed with a more clear, efficacious, practical faith of the Gospel, and our hearts so overcome, as practically and vitally to receive it, we should apprehend the things to be truly great wherein we are to unite, and should, in comparison, apprehend all things else to be little ; and so should be more strongly inclined to hold together by the things wherein we agree, than to contend with one another about the things wherein we differ. Thus our religion would revive, and become a vital powerful thing ; and consequently more grateful to God, and awful to men. And if we in our several particular sta- tions are but herein careful, if we but do our own part, we may be able to say it was not our fault, but Chris- tians had been combined, and entirely one with each other ; but they had been more thoroughly Christian, and more entirely united with God in Christ ; and that Christianity had been a more lively, powerful, awful, amiable thing. If the Christian commtmity moulder, decay, be enfeebled, broken, dispirited, and ruined in great part, this ruin shall not rest vmder our hands.' On July 20th this year, that noble patriot, William Lord Russel, was beheaded in Lincolns-Inn-Fields, to the no small terror and consternation of the true lovers of their country, and friends of the protestant religion. This was a severe stroke upon the Bedford family, and an unspeakable loss to the excellent lady, who was left a mournful widow, and continued so to the year 1723, when she went to her grave full of years. Mr. Howe upon this melancholy occasion wrote a consolatory letter to her, which very well deserves to be preserved, and transmitted to posterity ; an authentic copy of which having been kept safe in his family, here follows. ' Madam, ' It can avail you nothing, to let your honour know from what hand this paper comes ; and my own design in it is abundantly answered, if what it contains proves useful to you. Your affliction hath been great, unspeaJc- ably beyond what it is in my power or design to repre- sent ; and your supports (in the paroxysm of your afflic- tion) have been very extraordinary ; and such as wherein all that have observed or heard, could not but acknow- ledge a divine hand. ' But your affliction was not limited and enclosed within the limits of one black day, nor is like those more common ones, the sense whereof abates and wears off by time ; but is continued, and probably more felt, as time runs on : which therefore makes you need con- tinued help from Heaven every da5^ 'Yet there is here a great difference between what expectations we may have of divine assistance, in the beginning or first violence of some great affliction, and in the contintied course of it afterwards. At first we are apt to be astonished, a consternation seizes our thinking faculty, especially as to that exercise of it, whereby it should minister to our relief In this case the merciful God doth more extraordinarily assist such as sincerely trust and resign themselves to him ; unto these, as his more peculiar favourites, his sustaining influences are more immediate, and more efficacious, so as even (in the present exigency) to prevent and supersede any endeavour of theirs, whereof they are, then, less capable. And of the largeness and bounty of his goodness, in such a case, few have had greater experience than your ladyship ; which was eminently seen, in that magnanimity, that composure and present- ness of mind, much admired by your friends, and no doubt by the special favour of Heaven afforded you in the needful season : so that while that amazing ca- lamity was approaching, and stood in nearer view, nothing that was fit or wise or great was omitted, nothing indecent done. Which is not now said, God knows, to flatter your ladyship, (whereof the progress will further vindicate me,) for I ascribe it to God, as I trust your ladyship, with unfeigned gratitude, will also do. And I mention it, as that whereby you are under THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. obligation to endeavour, your continued temper and deportment may be agreeable to such beginnings. ' For now (which is the other thing, whereof a distinct observation ought to be had) in the continuance and settled state of the affliction, when the fury of the first assault is over, and we have had leisure to recollect ourselves, and recover our dissipated spirits, though we are then more sensible of pain and smart, yet also the power of using our own thoughts is restored. And being so, although we are too apt to use them to our greater hurt and prejudice, we are really put again into a capacity of using them to our advantage, which oui" good God doth in much wisdom and righteousness require we should do. Whereupon we are to expect his continual assistance for our support under continued affliction, in the way of concurrence and co-operation with our due use of our own thoughts, aptly chosen, as much as in us is, and designed by ourselves, for our own comfort and support. 'Now as for thoughts suitable to your honour's case, I have reason to be conscious that what I shall write can make but little accession, I will not say to a closet, but to a mind so well furnished, as you are owner of: yet I know it is remote from you to slight a well-in- tended offer and essay, that really proceeds only from a verj' compassionate sense of your sorrows, and un- feigned desire to contribute something (if the Father of mercies, and the God of all comforts and consola- tions, will please to favour the endeavour) to your relief. 'And the thoughts which I shall most humbly offer, will have that first and more immediate design, but to persuade your making use of )'^our own ; that is, that you would please to turn and apply them to subjects more apt to serve this purpose, the moderating your own grief, and the attaining an habitual well-tempered cheerfulness, for your remaining time in this world. For I consider how incident it is to the afiiicted, to indulge to themselves an unlimited liberty in their sorrows, to give themselves up to them, to make them meat and drink, to justify them in all their excesses, as that (otherwise) good and holy man of God did his anger, and say, they do well to be sorrowful even to the death, and (as another) to refuse to be comforted. And I also consider that our own thoughts must and will always be the immediate ministers either of our trouble or comfort, though as to the latter, God only is the supreme Author; and we altogether insufficient to think any thing that good is, as of ourselves. It is God that comforts those that are cast down, but by our own thoughts employed to that purpose, not without them. ' I do not doubt, madam, but if you once fixedly ap- prehend that there is sin in an over-abounding sorrow, you will soon endeavour its restraint: for I cannot think you would more earnestly set 5'^ourself to avoid any thing, than what you apprehend will offend God, especially the doing that in a continued course. Is there any time when joy in God is a duty? 'tis very plain the .sorrow that excludes it is a sin. How the former may appear to be a duty, and how far, let it be considered. ' It is not to be doubled but that he that made us hath a right to rule us; he that gave us being, to give os law: nor again, that the divine government reaches our minds, and that they are the prime and first seat of his empire. His kingdom is within us. We are not then to exercise our thoughts, desires, love, joy, or sorrow, according to our own will, but his; not as we please, or find ourselves inclined, but suitably to his precepts and purposes, his rules and ends. ' 'Tis evident that withal the earthly state is mixed, intermediate between the perfect felicity of heaven, and the total misery of hell: and further, that the temper of our spirits ought to have in it a mixture of joy and sorrow, proportionable to our state, or what there is in it of the just occasions or causes of both. ' Where Christianity obtains, and the Gospel of our Saviour is preached, there is much greater cause of joy than elsewhere. The visible aspect of it imports a design to form men's minds to gladness, inasmuch as, wheresoever it comes, it proclaims peace to the world, and represents the offended Majesty of heaven willing to be reconciled to his offending creatures on earth. So the angel prefaced the Gospel, when our Lord was born into the world, Luke ii. I tell 3'ou glad tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. And so the multitude of accompanying angels sum it up ; Glory be to God in Jhe highest, peace on earth, good will towards men. ' To them that truly receive the Gospel, and wuh whom it hath its effect, the catise of rejoicing riseth much higher. For if the offer and hope of recon- ciliation be a just ground of joy, how much more actual agreement with God, upon the terms of the Gospel, and reconciliation itself! We rejoice in God through Jesus Christ, by whom we have received the atonement, Rom. v. 11. To such there are express precepts given to rejoice in the Lord alwa)"s, Phil. iv. 4. And lest that should be thought to have been spoken hastily, and that it might have its full weight, that great apostle immediately adds. And again I say to you, rejoice. And elsewhere. Rejoice evermore, I Thess. V. 16. ' Hence therefore the genuine right temper and frame of a truly Christian mind and spirit may be evidently con- cluded to be this, (for such precepts do not signify no- thing, nor can they be understood to signify less,) viz. an habitual joyfulncss, prevailing over all the tempo- rary occasions of sorrow, that occur to them. For none can be thought of that can preponderate, or be equal to the jtist and great causes of their ]0}^ This is the true frame, model, and constitution of the kingdom of God, which ought to have place in us; herein it con- sists, viz. in righteousness and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost, Rom. xiv. 17. ' Nor is this a theory only, or the idea and notion of an excellent temper of spirit, which we may contem- plate indeed, but can never attain to. For we find it I also to have been the attainment, and usual temper of THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. Christians heretofore, that being justified by faith, and having peace with God, they have rejoiced in hope of the glory of God, unto that degree, as even to glory in their tribulations also, Rom. v. 1—3. And that in the confidence they should be kept by the power of God, through faith unto salvation, they have hereupon greatly rejoiced, though with some mixture of heaviness (where- of there was need) from their manifold trials. But that their joy did surmount and prevail over their heaviness is manifest ; for this is spoken of with much diminution, whereas they are said to rejoice greatly, and with a joy anspeakable and full of glory, 1 Pet. i. 5, G, 8. ' Yea, and such care hath the great God taken for the preserving of this temper of spirit among his people more anciently, that even their sorrow for sin itself (the most justifiable of all other) hath had restraints put upon it, lest it should too long exclude or intermit the exercise of this joy. For when a great assembly of them were universally in tears, upon hearing the law read, and the sense given, they were forbidden to weep or mourn, or be sorry, because the joy of the Lord was their strength, Neh. viii. 8—10. That most just sorrow had been unjust, had it been continued, so as to ex- clude the seasonable turn and alternation of this joy. For even such sorrow itself is not required, or neces- sary for itself 'Tis remote from the goodness and benignity of God's ever-blessed nature, to take pleasure in the sorrows of his people, as they are such, or that they should sorrow for sorrow's sake; but only as a means and preparative to their following joy. And nothing can be more unreasonable, than that the means should exclude the end, or be used against the purpose tbey should serve. ' It is then upon the whole most manifest, that no temporary afliiction whatsoever, upon one who stands ifl special relation to God, as a reconciled (and which is consequent, an adopted) person, though attended with the most aggravating circumstances, can justify such a sorrow, (so deep or so continued,) as shall pre- vail against and shut out a religious holy joy, or hinder it from being the prevailing principle in such a one. What can make that sorrow allowable or innocent, (what event of Providence, that can, whatever it is, be no other than an accident to our Christian state,) that shall resist the most natural design and end of Chris- tianity itself? that shall deprave and debase the truly Christian temper, and disobey and violate most express Christian precepts 1 subvert the constitution of Christ's kingdom among men 1 and turn this earth (the place of God's treaty with the inhabitants of it, in order to their reconciliation to himself, and to the reconciled the portal and gate of heaven, yea, and where the state of the very worst and most miserable has some mixture of good in it, that makes the evil of it less than that of hell) into a mere hell to themselves, of sorrow without mixture, and ■wherein shall be nothing but weeping and wailing. '■ The cause of your sorrow, madam, is exceeding great. Tne causes of your joy are inexpressibly greater. You have infinitely more left than you have lost. Doth it r.eed to be disputed whether God be better and greater than man"? or more to be valued, loved, and delighted in 1 and whether an eternalrelation be more considerable than a temporary one 1 Was it not your constant sense in your best outward state. Whom have I in heaven but thee, O God, and whom can I desire on earth, in compa- rison of thee ! Psal. Ixxiii. 25. Herein the state of your ladyship's case is still the same (if you cannot rather with greater clearness and with less hesitation pronounce those latter words.) The principal causes of your joy are immutable, such as no supervening thing can alter. You have lost a most pleasant, delectable, earthly rela- tive. Doth the blessed God hereby cease to be the best and most excellent good 7 Is his nature changed 1 his everlasting covenant reversed and annulled 1 which is ordered in all things and sure, and is to be all your salvation and all your desire, whether he make your house on earth to grow or not to grow, 2 Sam. xxiii. 4. That sorrow which exceeds the proportion of its cause, compared with the remaining true and real causes of rejoicing, is in that excess causeless; i. e. that excess of it wants a cause, such as can justify or aflford de- fence unto it. ' We are required, in reference to our nearest relations in this world, (when we lose them,) to weep as if we wept not, as well as (u^hen we enjoy them) to rejoice as if we rejoiced not, because our time here is short, and the fashion of this world passeth away, 1 Cor. vii. 29 — 31. We are finite beings, and so are they. Our passions in reference to them must not be infinite, and without limit, or be limited only by the limited capa- city of our nature, so as to work to the utmost extent of that, as the fire burns, and the winds blow, as much as they can: but they are to be limited by the power, design, and endeavour of our rea.son and grace (not only by the mere impotency of our nature) in reference to all created objects. Whereas in reference to the in- finite uncreated Good, towards which there is no dan- ger or possibility of exceeding in our affection, we are never to design to ourselves any limits at all; for that would suppose we had loved God enough, or as much as he deserved, which were not only to limit ourselves, but him too ; and were a constructive denial of his in- finite immense goodness, and consequently of his very Godhead. Of so great concernment it is to us, that in the liberty we give our affections, we observe the just difference which ought to be in their exercise, towards God, and towards creatures. ' It is also to be considered, that the great God is pleased so to condescend, as himself to bear the name and sustain the capacity of our nearest earthly relations ; which implies that what they were to us, in this or that kiiid, he will be in a transcendent and far more noble kind. I doubt not but your ladyship hath good right to apply to yourself those words of the prophet, Isa. Ivi. 5. Thy Maker is thy husband, &c. Whereupon, as he infinitely transcends all that is delectable in the most excellent earthly relation, it ought to be endea- voured, that the affection placed on him should pro- portionably excel. I cannot think any person in the world would be a more severe or impartial judge of a THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. criminal affection than your ladyship : or that it would look worse unto any eye, if any one should so deeply lake to heart the death of an unrelated person, as never to take pleasure more, in the life, presence, and conver- sation of one most nearly related. And you do well know that such an height (or that supremacy) of affec- tion, as is due to the ever-blessed God, cannot without great injury be placed any where else. As we are to have none other God before him ; so him alone we are to love with all our heart and soul, and might and mind. ' And it ought further to be remembered, that whatso- ever interest we have or had in any the nearest relative on earth, his interest who made both is far superior. He made us and all things primarily for himself, to serve great and important ends of his own ; so that our satis- faction in any creature, is but secondary and collateral to the principal design of its creation. ' Which consideration would prevent a practical error and mistake that is too usual with pious persons, afflicted M-ith the loss of any near relation, that they think the chief intention of such a providence is their punishment. And hereupon they are apt to justify the utmost excesses of their sorrow, upon such an occasion, accounting they can never be sensible enough of the divine displeasure appearing in it; and make it their whole business (or employ their time and thoughts be- yond a due proportion) to find out and fasten upon some particular sin of theirs, which they may judge God was offended with them for, and designed now to punish upon them. It is indeed the part of filial ingenuity, deeply to apprehend the displeasure af our father ; and an argument of great sincerity, to be very inquisitive after any sin for which we may suppo.se him displeased with us, and apt to charge ourselves severely with it, though perhaps upon utmost inquiry, there is nothing particularly to be reflected on, other than common in- firmity incident to the best, (and it is well when at length we can make that judgment, because there really is no more, not for that we did not inquire,) and perhaps also God intended no more in such a dispensa- tion, (as to what concerned us in it,) than only, in the general, to take off our minds and hearts more from this world, and draw them more entirely to himself. For if we were never so innocent, must therefore such a relative of ours have been immortal 1 But the error in practice as to this case, lies here : not that our thoughts are muck exercised this way, but too much. We ought to consider in every case, principally, that which is principal. God did not create this or that ex- cellent person, and place him for a while in the world, principally lo please us ; nor therefore doth he take him away, principally to displease or punish us ; but for much nobler and greater ends which he hath pro- posed to himself concerning him. Nor are we to reckon ourselves so little interested in the great and sovereign Lord of all, whom we have taken to be our God, and to whom we have absolutely resigned and devoted our- selves, as not to be obliged to consider and satisfy our- selves, in his pleasure, purposes, and ends, more than our own, apart from his. ' Such as he hath pardoned, accepted and prepared for himself, are to serve and glorify him in a higher and more excellent capacity, than they ever could in this wretched world of ours, and wherein they have them- selves the highest satisfaction. When the blessed God is pleased in having attained and accomplished the end and intendments of his own boundless love, (too great to be satisfied with the conferring of only temporary favours in this imperfect state,) and they are pleased in partaking the full effects of that love ; who are we, that we should be displeased 1 or that we should oppose our satisfaction, to that of the glorious God, and his glori- fied creature 1 Therefore, madam, whereas you cannot avoid to think much on this subject, and to have the removal of that incomparable person for a great theme of your thoughts, I do only propose most humbly to your honour, that you would not confine them to the sadder and darker part of that theme. It hath also a bright side ; and it equally belongs to it, to consider whither he is gone, and to whom, as whence, and from whom. Let, I beseech you, your mind be more exer- cised in contemplating the glories of that state your blessed consort is translated unto, which will mingle pleasure and sweetness with the bitterness of your afflicting loss, by giving you a daily intellectual parti- cipation (through the exercise of faith and hope) in his enjoyments. He cannot descend to share with you in your sorrows ; you may thus every day ascend and partake with him in his joys. He is a pleasant sub- ject to consider. A prepared spirit made meet for an inheritance with them that are sanctified, and with the saints in light, now entered into a state so con-natural, and wherein it finds every thing most agreeable to itself. How highly grateful is it to be imited with the true cen- tre, and come home to the Father of spirits ! To consider how pleasant a welcome, how joyful an entertainment he hath met with above ! how delighted an a.'^sociate he is with the general assembly, the innumerable company of angels, and the spirits of just men made perfect ! how joyful an homage he continuall}' pays to the throne of the celestial King ! ' Will your ladyship think that a hard saying of our departing Lord to his mournful disciples. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, that I said I go to the Father ; for my Father is greater than I "? As if he had said, he sits enthroned in higher glory than j'ou can frame any conception of, by beholding me in so mean a condition on earth. We are as remote, and as much short in our thoughts as to the conceiving the glorj' of the Supreme Kins:, as a peasant, who never saw any thing better than his own cottage, from conceiving the splendour of the most glorious prince's court. But if that faith, which is the substance of things hoped for, and ihe evidence of things not seen, be much accustomed to its proper work and business, the dail}' delightful visiting and viewing the glorious invisible regions ; if it be often conversant in those vast and spacious tracts of pure and brightest light, and amongst the holy inhabit- ants that replenish them ; if it frequently employ itself in contemplating their cornel}' order, perfect harmony, THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE sublime wisdom, unspotted purit.y, most fervent mutual love, delicious conversation with one another, and per- petual pleasant consent in their adoration and observ- ance of their eternal King ! who is there to whom it would not be a solr>;e to think, I have such and such friends and relatives (some perhaps as dear as my own life) perfeclly well pleased, and happy among them 1 How can your love, madam, (so generous a love towards so deserving an object !) how can it but more fervently sparkle in joy, for his sake, than dissolve in tears for your own 1 ' Nor should such thoughts excite over-hasty impatient desires of following presently into heaven, but to the endeavours of serving God more cheerfully on earth, for our appointed time : which I earnestly desire your ladyship would apply yourself to, as you would not displease God, who it your only hope, nor be cruel to yourself, nor dishonour the religion of Christians, as if ihey had no other consolations than this earth can give, and earthly power take from them. Your ladyship (if any one) would be loth to do any thing unworthy your family and parentage. Your highest alliance is to that Father and family above, whose dignity and honour are I doubt not of highest account with you. ' I multiply words, being loth to lose my designs. And shall only add that consideration, which cannot but be valuable with you, upon his first proposal, who had all the advantages imaginable to give it its full weight ; I mean, that of those dear pledges left behind : my own heart even bleeds to think of the case of those sweet babes, should they be bereaved of their other parent too. And even your continued visible dejection would be their unspeakable disadvantage. You will alwa3's naturally create in them a reverence of 3'^ou ; and I cannot but apprehend how the constant mean aspect and deportment of such a parent will insensibly influence the temper of dutiful children ; and (if that be sad and despondent) depress their spirits, blunt and take off the edge and quickness, upon which their fu- ture usefulness and comfort will much depend. Were it possible their (now glorious) father should visit and inspect you, would you not be troubled to behold a frown in that bright serene face 1 You are to please a more penetrating eye, which you will best do, by put- tmg on a temper and deportment suitable to your weighty charge and duty, and to the great purposes for which God continues you in the world, by giving over unnecessary solitude and retirement, which (though it pleases) doth really prejudice you, and is more than you can bear. Nor can any rules of decency require more. Nothing that is necessary and truly Christian, ought to be reckoned unbecoming. David's example, 2 Sam. xii. 20. is of too great authority to be counted a pattern of indecency. The God of heaven lift up the light of his countenance upon you, and thereby put gladness into your heart ; and give you to apprehend him saying to you. Arise and walk in the light of the Lord. i History of his ovm Times, vol. i. page 388. k See the Life of Mr. Kettlewell, in 8vo. page 58. ' That I have used so much freedom in this paper, I make no apology for ; but do therefore hide myself m the dark, not judging it consistent with that plainness which I thought the case might require, to give any other account of myself, than that I am one deeply sensible of your and your noble relatives' great afflic- tion, and who scarce ever bow the knee before the mercy-seat without remembering it : and who shall ever be, Madam, Your ladyship's Most sincere honourer, and Most humble devoted servant,' Though Mr. Howe did not put his name to this his consolatory epistle, yet the style, and several particu- larities in it, soon discovered who was the author. The lady sent him a letter of thanks, and told him that he must not expect to remain concealed. She promised to endeavour to follow the advice he had given her, and often wrote to him afterwards, some of which letters I have seen and read, and they show that his freedom was taken kindly, and his pains well bestowed. 'Tis observed by Bishop Burnet,i concerning this excellent person the Lord Russell, who died a martyr for the liberties of his country, that he was a man of great candour, and of a general reputation, universally beloved and trusted, of a generous and obliging temper. He had given such proofs of an undaunted courage, and of an unshaken firmness, that the Bishop says, he never knew any man have so entire a credit in the nation as he had. He adds, that he had from his first education an inclination to favour the nonconformists, and wished the laws could have been made eeisier to them. On the other hand, the high party represented him as one that had no very favourable opinion of the English clergy in general, as thinking them for the most part a set of men too much bigoted to slavish principles, and not zealous enough for the protestant religion, or the common interest of a free nation. k 'Tis hoped, that the remaining branches of that noble family will adhere to his principles, and imitate his glorious example. I go on to the year 1G84, in which Mr. Howe pub- lished a treatise, on Luke xix. 41, 42. entitled, ' The Re- deemer's Tears wept over Lost Souls ; with an Appendix,, where somewhat is occasionally discoursed, concerning, the Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, and how God is said to will the salvation of them that perish.' Bishop Burnet owns, that the prosecution of the dis- senters was carried very high all this year. They were not only proceeded against for going to conventicles, as he is pleased to call their private meetings for the worship of God, but for not going to church, and for not receiving the sacrament. The laws made against papists, with relation to those particulars, being now ap- plied to them. Many were excommunicated and ruined by these prosecutions.) I Bishop Bumet's History of his own Times, vol. i. page 591. THE LIFE OP MR. JOHN HOWE. XitU Among other warm things which at that time came from the press, there was a letter published by Bishop Barlow of Lincoln, for the putting in execution the laws against the dissenters: and this was written in concurrence with that whi:h was drawn up by the justices of the peace of the county of Bedford, bear- ing date Jan. 14th, 1684. In answer to this warm and angry printed letter of the Bishop of Lincoln, Mr. Howe sent his lordship a free letter by the post, a copy whereof has been preserved, and here foJlows. ' Right Reverend, 'As I must confess myself surprised by your late published directions to your clergy of the coimty of Bedford, so nor will I dissemble, that I did read them with some trouble of mind, which I sincerely profess was more upon your lordship's accormt than my own, (who for myself am little concerned,) or any other par- ticular person's whatsoever. It was such as it had not been veiy difficult for me to have concealed in my own breast, or only to have expressed it to God in my prayers for you, (which through his grace I have not altogether omitted to do,) if I had not apprehended it not utterly impossible, (as I trust I miight, without arrogating unduly to myself,) that some or other of those thoughts, which I have revolv- ed in my own mind upon this occasion, being only hinted to your lordship, might appear to your very sagacious judgment (for which I have had long, and have still, a continuing veneration) some way capable of being cultivated by your o-mi mature and second thoughts, so as not to be wholly unuseful to your lordship. 'My own judgment, such as it is, inclines me not to oppose any thing, either, 1. To the lawfulness of the things themselves which you so much desire should obtain in the practice of the people under your lord- ship's pastoral inspection : or, 2. To the desirable come- liness of an uniformity in the public and solemn wor- ship of God: or, 3. To the fitness of making laws for the effecting of such uniformity: or, 4. To the execu- tion of such laws, upon some such person as may pos- sibly be found among so numerous a people as are under your lordship's care. 'But the things which I humbly conceive are to be deliberated on, are, 1. Whether all the laws that are in being about matters of that nature, ought now to be executed upon all the persons which any way transgress them, without distinction of either "? 2. Whether it was so well, that your lordship should advise and press that indistinct execution, which the order (to which the subjoined directions of your lordship do succenturiate) seems to intend; supposing that designed execution were fit in itself 'I shall not need to speak severally to these heads: your lordship will sufficiently distinguish what is ap- plicable the one way or the other. But I humbly offer to your lordship's further consideration, whether it be not a supposable thing, that some persons found in the faith, strictly orthodox in all the articles of it taught by our Lord Jesus or his apostles, resolvedly loyal, and subject to the authority of their governors m church and state, of pious, sober, peaceable, just, charitable dispo- sitions and deportments, may yet (while they agree with your lordship in that evident principle, both by the law of nature and Scripture, that their prince and inferior rulers ought to be actively obeyed in all lawful things) have a formed fixed judgment (for what were to be done in the case of a mere doubt, that hath not arrived to a settled preponderation this way or that, is not hard to determine) of the unlawfulness of some or other of the rites and modes of worship enjoined to be observed in this church 1 For my o^mi part, though perhaps I should not be found to differ much from your lordship in most of the things here referred unto, I do yet think that few metaph3'sical questions are disputed with nicer subtlety, than the matter of the ceremonies has been by Archbishop Whitgift, Cartwright, Hooker, Parker, Dr. Burgess, Dr. Ames, Gillespy, Jeanes, Calderwood, Dr. Owen, Baxter, &c. Now, is it impossible that a sincere and sober Christian may, with an honest heart, have so weak intellectuals, as not to be able to understand all the punctilios upon which a right judgment of such a matter may depend 1 And is it not possible there may be such a thing, as a mental as well as a merely sensitive antipathy, not vincible by ordinary methods'? Is there no difference to be put between things essential to our religion, and things confessed indifferent on the one hand, and on the other judged imlawful; on both hands but accidental! (though they that think them unlawful, daxf, not allow themselves a liberty of sin- ning, even in accidentals.) If your lordship were the paterfamilias to a numerous family of children and servants, among whom one or other very dutiful child takes offence, not at the sort of food you have thought fit should be provided, but somewhat in the sauce or way of dressing, which thereupon he for- bears; you try all the means which j'our paternal wisdom and severity thinks fit, to overcome that aver- sion, but in vain; would you finally famish this child, rather than yield to his inclination in so small a thing 1 ' My lord, your lordship well knows the severity of some of those laws which you press for the execution of is such, as being executed, they must infer the utter ruiu of them who observe them not, in their temporal concernment; and not that only, but their deprivation of the comfortable advantages appointed by our blessed Lord, for promoting their spiritual and eternal well- being. I cannot but be well persuaded not only of the mere sincerity, but eminent sanctity of divers, upon my own knowledge and experience of them, who would sooner die at a stake, than I or any man can prevail with them (notwithstanding our rubric, or whatever can be said to facilitate the matter) to kneel before the consecrated elements at the Lord's table. Would your lordship necessitate such, perdere suhstantiam propter accidentia? What if there be considerable numbers of such in your lordship's vastly numerous flock; will it THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. be comfortable to you, when an account is demanded of your lordship by the great Shepherd and Bishop of souls concerning them, only to be able to say, Though, Lord, I did believe the provisions of thine house pur- chased for them, necessary and highly useful for their salvation, I drove them away as dogs and swine from thy table, and stirred up such other agents as I could influence against them, by whose means I reduced many of them to beggary, ruined many families, banished them into strange countries, where they might (for me) serve other gods; and this not for disobeying any immediate ordinance or law of thine, but because for fear of offending thee, they did not in every thing comport with my own appointments, or which I was directed to urge and impose upon theml How well would this practice afree with that apostolical precept. Him thnt is weak in the faith receive, but not to doubt- ful disputations'? I know not how your lordship would relieve yourself in this case, but by saying they were not weak, nor conscientious, but wilful and humoursome. But what shall then be said to the subjoined expostu- lation, Who art thou that judgest thy brother 1 we shall all stand before the judgment-seat of Christ. What if they have appeared conscientious, and of a very tmblameable conversation in all things else? What if better qualified for Christian communion in all other respects, than thousands you admitted 1 If you say you know of none such under your charge so severely dealt with, it will be said. Why did you use such severity toward them you did not knowl or urge and animate them to use it, whom you knew never likely to distin- guish 1 A ■'^ery noted divine of the Church of England said to me in discourse not very long ago, upon mention of tne ceremonies. Come, come, the Christian church and religion is in a consumption; and it ought to be done as in the case of consumptive persons, shave off the hair to save the life. Another (a dignified person) present, replied, 1 doubt not it will be so, in the Phila- delphian state. I long thought few had been in the temper of their minds nearer it than your lordship, and am grieved, not that I so judged, but that I am mis- taken; and to see your lordship the first public example to the rest of your order in such a course. Blessed Lord ! how strange is it that so long experience will not let us see, that little, and so very disputable matters, can never be the terms of union so much to be desired in the Christian church; and that in such a case as ours is, nothing will satisfy, but the destruction of them, whose union upon so nice terms we cannot ob- tain ; and then to call sulitMdinem, pacem ! But we must, it seems, understand all this rigour your lordship shows, to proceed from love, and that you are for de- stroying the dissenters, only to mend their understand- ings, and because afflidio dat intellectum. I hope indeed God will sanctify the affliction which you give and procure them, to blessed purposes; and perhaps m The Complete History of England, vol. iii. paffe 393. tells us, that the Coininons, in 1690, prepared a bill for exempting his majesty's protestant .sub- jects, dissenting from the church of England, from the penalties imposed upon tlie papists, by repealin? the act of HB Eliz. This bill passed the Commons, and was agreed to by ihe Lords, and lay ready for liis majesty's assent. But periissent nisi pentssent : but for the purposes your lordship seems to aim at, I wonder what you can ex- pect. Can you, by undoing men, change the judgment of their consciences 1 or if they should tell you. We do indeed in our consciences judge, we shall greatly offend God by complying with your injunctions, but yet to save being undone, we will do it ; will this qualify them for your communion 1 If your lordship think still, you have judged and advised well in this matter, you have the judgment of our sovereign, upon twelve years' experience, lying against you: you have as to one of the laws you would have executed, the judgment of both houses of parliament against you, who passed a bill (to which perhaps you consented) for taking it away.m You have (as to all of them) the judgment of the last House of Commons sitting at Westminster, so far as to the season then, of executing those laws. It may be your lordship thinks it now a fitter season : but if you have misjudged, or misdone against your judg- ment, I pray God to rectify your error by gentler methods, and by less affliction, than you have designed to your brethren: and do not for all this doubt, (any more for your part than my own,) to meet you there one day, where Luther and Zuinglius are well agreed. If I did think that would contribute any thing to the honest and truly charitable design of this letter, I should freely and at large tell you my name: and do however tell you, I am, A sincere honourer of your lordship. And your very faithful, humble servant.' What effects this letter might have I know not, but I must confess I think it to have been very strong and moving, and likely to make impression. In 1685, the dissenters were run down universally, and hardly any one durst speak or write in their favour ; and the prospects people had with respect to the public, grew every day more and more gloomy. Mr. Howe therefore having an invitation given him by the Lord Wharton to travel with him abroad, into foreign parts, accepted it readily. He had so little time given him to prepare for his voyage, which he entered upon in the month of August this year, that he had not an oppor- tunity of taking leave of his friends, but sent a letter to them from the other side the water, which was thus directed. ' To such, in and about London, among whom I have laboured in the work of the Gospel.' It here follows. 'My most dearly beloved in our blessed Lord and Sa- viour Jesus Christ, grace, mercy, and peace be through him multiplied unto you. ' That I am at this time at this distance from you, is, I am persuaded, (upon the experience I have had of your great love and value of my poor labours,) not pleasant to you, and I do assure you it is grievous to me, though when his majesty came to the throne, to pass this among other bills, this was taken from the table, and never heard of after. Which no man durst have done, without the king's command, or at least liis privityand conni^'ance at it. The loss of this bill was complained of in the next parliament at Oxford, but With- out satisfaction or redress. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. xir I murmur not at the wise and holy Providence that hath ordered things thus, in reference to you and me: but it added to my trouble, that I could not so much as Did farewell to persons to whom I had so great endear- ments, the solemnity whereof you know our circum- stances would not admit. Nor could I have opportu- nity to communicate to you the grounds of my taking this long journey, being under promise while the mat- ter was under consideration, not to speak of it to any one that was not concerned immediately about it: neither could I think that imprudent in itself, where acquaintance was so numerous ; silence towards dearest friends in such cases usually being designed for an apology to all others. And after the resolution was taken, my motion depending on another, I had not time for that, or any such purposes. And should I yet communicate them, as they lie particularly in my own thoughts, it would lose time that I may more profitably employ, for both you and myself, while I do it not. You will, I may be confident, be more prudent and equal, than to judge of what you do not know : but so much I shall in the general say, that the providence of God gave me the prospect of a present quiet abode, with some opportunity of being serviceable; (and I hope, as it may prove through his help and blessing, unto you, if I have life and health to finish what I have been much pressed by some of yourselves to go on with;) which opportunity I could not hope to have nearer you, at least without being imreasonably bur- densome to some, while I was designing service as much as in me lay to all. It much satisfies me that I have a record above, I am not designing for myself; that he who knoweth all things, knows I love not this present world, and I covet not an abode in it, (nor have I when it was most friendly to me,) upon any other ac- count, than upon doing some service to him, and the souls of men. It therefore has been my settled habi- tual sense and sentiment a long time, to value and de- sire (with submission to sovereign good pleasure) peace and quiet, with some tolerable health, more than life. Nor have I found any thing more destructive to my health, than confinement to a room a few days in the city air, which was much better and more healthful to me formerly, than since the anger and jealousies of such as I never had a disposition to offend, have of later times occasioned persons of my circumstances very seldom to walk the streets. ' But my hope is, God will in his good time incline the hearts of rulers more to favour such as cannot be satisfied with the public constitutions in the matters of God's worship, and that are innocent and peaceable in the land ; and that my absence from you will be for no long time, it being my design, with dependence upon his gracious providence and pleasure, in whose hands our times are, if I hear of anj' door open for service with you, to spend the health and strength which God shall vouchsafe me, (and which I find through lus mercy much improved since I left 3'ou,) in his work with and among you. In the mean time, I believe it will not be unacceptable to you, that I offer you some of my thoughts and counsels, for your pre.sent help, such as are not new to me, nor as you will find to )'our- selves, who are my witnesses, that I have often incul- cated such things to you; but they may be useful to stir you up, by putting you in remembrance. 'I. I beseech you, more earnestly endeavour to re- duce the things you know (and have been by many hands instructed in out of the Gospel of our Lord) to practice. IS'othing can be more absurd than to content ourselves with only a notional knowledge of practical matters. We should think so in other cases. As if any man should satisfy himself to know the use of food, but famish himself by never eating any, when he hath it at hand: or that he understands the virtues of this or that cordial, but languishes away to death in the neglect of using it, when it might cheer his spirits, and save his life. And the neglect of applying the great things of the Gospel to the proper uses and purposes of the Christian life, is not more foolish, (only as the con- cernments they serve for are more important,) but much more sinful and provoking to God. For we are to con- sider whence the revelation comes. They are things which the mouth of the Lord hath spoken; uttered by the breath of the eternal God, as all Scriptures are said to be. God breathed, as that expression may be liter- ally rendered, 2 Tim. iii. 16. And how high a con- tempt and provocation is it of the great God, so totally to pervert and disappoint the whole design of that re- velation he hath made to us, to know the great things contained therein, only for knowing sake, which he hath made known that we might live by them. And* oh what holy and pleasant lives should we lead in this world, if the temper and complexion of our souls did answer and correspond to the things Ave knoin'. The design of preaching has been greatly mistaken, when it has been thought, it must still acquaint them who live (and especially who have long lived) under it, with some new thing. Its much greater and more im- portant design is the impressing of known things (but too little considered) upon the hearts of hearers, that they may be delivered up into the mould and form of the doctrine taught them, as Rom. vi. 12. : and may so learn Christ as more and more to be renewed in the spirit of their minds, and put off the old man and put on the new, Eph. iv. 20. The digesting our food is what God now eminentl)'^ calls for. ' II. More particularlj' labour to have your apprehen- sions of the future state of the xmseen world, and eter- nal things, made more lively and efficacious daily, emd that joMT faith of them may be such as may truly ad- mit to be called the very substance and evidence of those things. Shall that glorious everlasting state of things be always as a dark shadow with us, or as the images we have of things in a dream, ineffectual and vanishing, only because we have not seen with our eyes, where God himself hath by his express word made the representations of them to us, who never de- ceived us, as oxir own eyes and treacherous senses have done1 Why do we not live as just now entering into the eternal state, and as if we now beheld the glorious THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. appearing of ihe great God our Saviour, when we are as much, assured of them as if we beheld them 1 Why do we not oftener view the representation of the heavens vanishing, the elements melting, the earth flaming, the angels every where dispersed to gather the elect, and them ascending, caught up to meet the Redeemer in the air, ever to be with the Lordl What a trifle will the world be to us then ! 'III. Let the doctrine of the Redeemer be more studied, and of his mighty undertaking, with the im- mediate design of it, not merely to satisfy for sin by the sacrifice he once for all made of himself, and so to procure our pardon and justification, without effecting any thing upon us, but to redeem us from all iniquity, to purify us to himself, &c. and to form us after his own holy likeness, and for such purposes to give his Holy Spirit to us. Consider that our Redeemer is mighty, who hath such kind designs upon us^ and that as they shall not therefore fijially fail of accomplish- ment, so will they be carried on without interruption, and with discernible success, if we fail not as to what pert in subordination to him belongs to us. How cheerfully should the redeemed of the Lord go on in their course, under such conduct ! 'IV. Endeavour your faith may be stronger, more efficacious and practical, concerning the doctrine of Providence, and that the workings and events of it lie all under the management and in the hand of the Re- deemer, who is head over all things to the church : that therefore how grievous and bitter soever be his people's lot and portion at any time, there cannot but be kind- ness at the bottom; and that not only designing the best end, but taking the fittest way to it. For can love itself be unkind, so as not to design well! or wisdom itself err so, as to take an improper course in order thereto! Hereupon let not your spirits be imbittered by tlie present dispensation of Providence you are under, whereby you are in so great a part deprived of the helps and means of your spiritual advantage, which you like and relish most. And to this purpose consider, ' 1. Our wise and merciful Lord (though perhaps such means might be in some measure useful to us) doth for th€ present judge, that his rebuking our undue use of them will be more useful ; either overvaluing or undervaluing his instruments, turning his ordinances into mere formalities, preferring the means of grace {as they are fitly called) before the end, grace itself '2. Consider whether there be no disposition of Spi- rit, to treat others as you are treated. The inward temper of our minds and spirits is so much the more narrowly to be inspected, by how much the less there is opportunity to discover it by outward acts. As to such as differ from us about the forms and ceremonies that are now required in the worship of God, would we not be glad if they were as much restrained from using them in their worship, as we from worshipping without them? And do not we think that that would &n much grieve them, as our restraint doth us"? And why should we suppose that their way should not as much suit their spirits, and. be as grateful to them, as ours to usl But we are in the right way, some will say, and they in the wrong : and why cannot any man say the same thing with as much confidence as we'i Or do we think there is no difference to be put betweei. controversies about matter of circumstance, and about the essentials of Christianity'? Undoubtedly till those that affect the name of the reformed, and count it more their glory to be called protestants than to be good Christians, have learnt to mingle more justice with their religion, and how better to apply that great ad- vice of our Lord's, Whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do that to them, &c. and till they become studious of excelling other men, in substantial goodness, abstractedness from the world, meekness humility, sobriety, self-denial, and charity, and to lay a greater stress hereon, than on being of one or other denomination, God's controversy will not cease. 'I reckon it much to be considered, and I pray you consider it deeply, that after that great precept, Eph. iv. 30. Grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, it imme- diately follows, ver. 31. Let all bitterness, and anger^ and wrath, and clamour, and evil speaking be put away from you, with all malice : plainly implying that the Spirit of God, that Spirit of all love, goodness, sweet- ness, and benignity, is grieved by nothing more than by our bitterness, wrathfulness, &c. And it appears that the discernible restraint and departure of that blessed Spirit from the Church of Christ in so great a measure, for many foregoing generations, in comparison of the plentiful efl^'usion of it in the first age, hath en- sued upon the growth of that wrathful contentious Spirit which showed itself early in the Gnostick, but much more in the after-Arian persecution, which was not in some places less bloody than the pagan persecu- tion had been before. Oh the gentleness, kindness, tenderness, and compassionateness of the evangelical truly Christian spirit, as it most eminently appeared in our Lord Jesus Christ himself! And we are told, if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none oi his, Rom. viii. 9. And how easy and pleasant is it to one's own self, to be void of all wrathfulness, and vin- dictive designs or inclinations towards any other man! For my own part, I should not have that peace and consolation in a suffering condition, (as my being so many years under restraint from that pleasant work of pleading with sinners that they might be saved, is the greatest suffering I was liable to in this world,) as through the goodness of God I have found, and do find, in being conscious to myself of no other than kind and benign thoughts towards them I have suffered by, and that my heart tells me I desire not the least hurt to them that would do me the greatest; and that I feel within myself an unfeigned love and high estimatioa of divers, accounting them pious worthy persons, and hoping to meet them in the all-reconciling world, that are yet (through some mistake) too harsh towards us who dissent from them: and in things of this nature I pray that you and I may abound more and more. But again, as I would not have your spirits imbittered, so I would not have your spirits discouraged, or sunk THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. in dejection. The Lord will not cast off his people, because it hath pleased him to make them his people, 1 Sam. xii. 22. I do not mean those of this or that party, but who fear God and work righteousness, be they of what party soever. As I often think of that saying of an ancient, {Clem. Alex.) that he counted not that philosophy, which was peculiar to this or that sect, but whatsoever of truth was to be found in any of them; so I say of Christianity, 'tis not that which is appropriate to this or that party, but whatsoever of sincere religion shall be found common to them all. Such will value and love his favour and presence, and shall have it; and he will yet have such a people in the world, and, I doubt not, more numerous than ever. And as the bitterness of Christians one towards another chased away his Spirit, his Spirit shall vanquish and drive away all that bitterness, and consume our other dross. And as the aposiacy long ago foretold, and of so long continuance m the Christian church, hath been begun and continued by constant war agamst the Spirit of Christ; the restitution and recovery of the church, and the reduction of Christianity to its ancient self, and primitive state, will be by the victory of the Spirit of Christ over that so contrary spirit. Then shall all the enmity, pride, wrathfulness, and cruelty, which have rent the church of Christ and made it so little itself, be melted down; and with all their great impurities besides, earthliness, carnality, love of this present world, and prevalence of sensual lusts, be purged more generally away, and his repairing work be done in a way grievous to no one, whereby those that are most absolutely conquered will be most highly pleased: not by might or by power, but by the Spirit of the Lord. ' In the mean time let us draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to us. Let us more study the exercising ourselves to godliness, and take heed of turning the religion of our closets into spiritless uncomfortable formalities. Their hearts shall live that seek God. ' To that blessed, and faithful, and covenant-keeping God I commit you; and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up further, and give j'ou an inheritance among them that are sanctified. ' And as I hope I shall without ceasing remember you in mine, so I hope you will remember too in your prayers, Your sincerely affectionate, Though too unprofitable. Servant in Christ, JOHN HOWE.' In the course of his travels with this noble lord, Mr. Howe had the satisfaction of seeing divers noted places, and conversing freely, not only with a number of learned papists, but several protestant divines, both Lutherans and Calvinists, and making a variety of remarks for his own use : and in the mean time, he was often not a little affected with the melancholy tidings of the swift advances they were making in England towards popery and slavery, which he most heartily lamented, as well as the hardships and severities which his nonconforming brethren met with in particular. And not having any encouragement from the posture of affairs to return home, he at length, in the j^ear 1686, settled in the pleasant city of Utrecht, which is the capital of one of the seven United Provinces. Ha took a house, and resided there for some time, and had the Earl of Sutherland and his countess, and some English gentlemen, together with his two nephews, Mr. George and Mr. John Hughes, boarding with him. He took his turn of preaching at the English church in that city, with Mr. Matthew Mead, Mr. Woodcock, and Mr. Cross, who were there at the same time. They kept frequent days of solemn prayer together, on the account of the threatening state of affairs in their own country: and Mr. Howe generally preached on the Lord's-days in the evening in his o"wn family. And there being several English students then at that university, in order to their being fitted for future use- fulness, Mr. Howe was pleased to favour some of them with hearing their orations and disputations in private, and giving them his particular instructions and advice as they were prosecuting their studies, which some have owned to have been of no small advantage to them. There were also several other worthy persons of the English nation at that time there, and in other parts of the United Provinces, that they might shelter them- selves from prosecutions in their own country ; such as Sir John Thompson, (afterwards Lord Haversham,) Sir John Guise, Sir Patience Ward, and Mr. Papillon; and there was a good harmony and correspondence among them; and Mr. Howe received much respect from them, as well as from the professors in that academy. Among others by whom he was visited while he continued at Utrecht, one was Dr. Gilbert Burnet, afterward Bishop of Sarum, who also preached in the English church there, and very frankly declared for occasional communion with those of different senti- ments. He and Mr. Howe had a great deal of free conversation, upon a variety of subjects: and once discoursing of nonconformit}', the Doctor told him, he was apprehensive that it could not subsist long; but that when Mr. Baxter, and Dr. Bates, and he, and a few more, were once laid in their graves, it would sink, and die, and come to nothing. Mr. Howe replied, that that must be left to God ; though he at the same time intimated that he had different apprehensions ; and did not reckon it to depend upon persons, but upon prin- ciple, which when taken up upon grounds approved upon search, could not be laid aside by men of con- science. The best way, he said, to put an end to non- conformity, would be by giving due liberty under the national settlement, and laying aside needless clogs that would give occasion to endless debates. Were this once done, there would be no room for a conscien- tious nonconformity: but that without it, they could expect no other than that as some passed off the stage, others would rise up and fill their places, who woulJ act upon the same principles as they had done beloro them; though he hoped with a due moderation and THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. temper towards those of different sentiments. And the event has showed, that he was herein in the right. Several years after this, I myself having occasion to wait upon Dr. Burnet, after he had been some time Bishop of Sarum, at his palace in that city, where I was treated with great frankness and civility, his lord- ship signified how well he was pleased with the temper discovered by the rising generation of ministers among the dissenters; though at the same time he intimated, that it was the common apprehension of the great men of their church, that nonconformity would have been re& unius cctatis only, and not have been con- tinued to another generation, but have drawn to an end, when they that were ejected out of the public churches were once laid in their graves. Upon this occasion, I declared to his lordship, that which, having so fair an opportunity, I shall not now be shy of sig- nifying more publicly ; viz. that after the closest search into this matter of which I have been capable, I can- not perceive that while and as long as the spirit of im- position continues, any other can reasonably be ex- pected, than that there will be some who will think themselves obliged to stand up for a generous liberty, the doing of which may be very consistent with all that charity and brotherly love that is required, either by reason or Scripture. And this liberty has, since the death of the greatest part of the ejected ministers, (though with the full approbation of such of them as were then living, and of Mr. Howe in particular,) been defended by some among the dissenters, upon a bottom so truly large and noble, that the sagacious Mr. Locke himself, whom I believe most people will own to have been a pretty good judge, has more than once (as I have been credibly informed) freely owned, that as long as they kept to that bottom, they need not ques- tion being able to stand their ground. And the nvim- ber of their friends and abettors so increased, partly on the account of the largeness of the foundations they went upon, and partly also upon their steady zeal for the government after the revolution, while the estab- lished church was miserably divided, about the oaths, and a great many other things that were very distaste- ful to men of sense emd thought ;» that in all probabi- lity their interest must before this time have had a con- siderable accession of strength, had it not been for their tmaiccountable heals in the reign of King William, and also in the reign of his present majesty King George; by which they have been sadly exposed and weakened. But of all persons, those that are zealous for the established church, have little reason upon this account to insult them, because of the shameful differ- ences they have had amongst themselves, which in a great measure continue to this day. We may here say very safely, Iliacos intra muros peccatur et extra. While Mr. Howe continued in Holland, the late King William, (of glorious and immortal memory,) who was at that time Prince of Orange, did him the honour to admit him several times into his presence, and dis- n The miserable confuBion the high-church party were in after the revolution,' about the oatjisj ajid al?out their prayers, ei^d abw* coi^Mnunion, ^c is most coursed with him with great freedom ; and he eve? after retained a particular respect for him. I well re- member also, that he himself once informed me ol some very private conversation he had with that prince, upon his sending for him, not long before his death. Among other things, the king then asked him a great many questions, about his old master Oliver, as he called him, and seemed not a little pleased with the answers that were returned to some of his questions. In 1687, King James published his declaration for liberty of conscience, upon which the dissenters were freed from their fetters and shackles, and were allowed the freedom of worshipping God in public, in their own way, without any molestation. Mr. Howe's flock in London earnestly pressed for his return to them ac- cording to his promise, and he readily complied. But before he left Holland, he thought it proper to wait on the Prince of Orange, who in his usual way received him very graciously. He signified to his royal highness, that he was returning for England, at the earnest solicitation of his friends there, who were impatient of his absence, now that he was in a capacity of public service among them. The prince wished him a good voyage, and advised him, though he and his brethren made use of the liberty granted by King James, yet to be very cautious in addressing ; and not to be prevailed with upon any terms, to fall in with the measures of the court, as to taking off the penal laws and test, which was the thing intended, but which would have fatal consequences ; and to use his utmost influence in order to the restraining others: which he readily promised ; and he was as good as his word. Upon his return into his own country, which was in May this year, he was gladly received by his old friends and brethren, and v/ith joy (though not without an aching heart, considering the apparent danger of the public) returned to the free exercise of his ministry. He was thankful for a little breathing time afforded, and endeavoured to improve it to the best purposes, and to preserve himself and others from the snares that were laid for them. The author of the life of a celebrated nonjuror, casts some most invidious reflections upon the body of the dissenters, and their conduct in this reign. He in- sinuates, that when that inconsistent people had long cried out against the members of the church of Eng- land as inclinable to popery, they themselves were the first to join hands with this popery, against the church of England, and to favour the designs thereof, which they had but just before so loudly exclaimed against." And it must be owned, that they would have been an inconsistent people indeed, had the body of them acted in that manner : but the best of it is, that this is a sug- gestion that is as void of truth as it is of charity. li some among the dissenters did charge those of the church of England with favouring popery m King Charles's reign, it was because of their appearing so zealous for his brother, who was well known to be a admirably illustrated, by the account given in the Life of Mr. John Kettlewell Part, ni. o Lite of Mr. Kettlewell, in Svo. p. 141. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. papist, and from whom no other could be expected than that he would, if he came to the crown, do his utmost to bring in popery, in opposition to all the laws and securities against it ; and they evidently hazarded the loss of our liberty and religion too, by making the dangerous experiment : and they would boldly venture upon this, though they were freely warned beforehand what the consequence would be. But as for joining hands with this popery, none were more free from that than the dissenters. Bishop Burnet owns, that how much soever a few weak persons might be intoxicated by the caresses of the court, and elevated by an appearance of favour shown them, yet the ' wiser men among them saw through all this, and perceived the design of the papists was now to set on the dissent- ers against the church, as much as they had formerly set the church against them: and therefore, though they returned to their conventicles, (as he is pleased to call them, though not a jot the better thought of upon that account by his warmer brethren,) yet they had a just jealousy of the ill designs that lay hid un- der all this sudden and unexpected show of grace and kindness.'P In confirmation of this, I can upon good grounds assure the reader, that whereas there were about this time great endeavours used to draw in the dissenting ministers to approve the measures of the court, and fre- quent meetings among them to consider of their own behaviour, at which times Mr. Howe was seldom absent, he always declared against approving the dispensing power, or any thing that could give the papists any assistance in the carrying on their designs; and he therein had the full concurrence of the generality of his brethren. I have had a particular account of one meeting at Mr. Howe's own house, in order to consider of the advisableness of drawing up a writing to sig- nify their concurrence with the king, as to the ends of his declaration ; at which time there were two persons present that came from court, and intimated that his majesty waited in his closet, and would not stir from thence till an account was brought him of their pro- ceedings. I have heard that one in the company did intimate that he thought it but reasonable they should comply with his majesty's desire. To which another immediately replied, that he was fully convinced that the sufferings they had met with, had been all along on the account of their firm adherence to the civil interest of the nation, in opposition to tory schemes, rather than on the account of their religious principles: and there- fore if the king expected they should join in approving such a conduct as would give the papists their liberty, and establish a dispensing power, he had rather he should take their liberty again. Mr. Howe, in sum- ming up the matter, signified they were generally of that brother's sentiments, and could by no means en- courage the dispensing power; and it was left to those who came down to them from court, to report that as their common sense to those that sent them. Several p Bishop Bumefs History of liia own Times, vol. 1. pa^e 6T3. q Life of Mr. John Ketllewell, page 147. of their ministers were, it must be confessed, afterwards privately closeted by King James; and I won't say but some few of them, who had personal and particular favours shown them, might be drawn too far into the snare, and use their interest in order to the taking off all penal laws and tests : but they were but very few, and as soon as it was known, their interest and sig- nificance was lessened; the far greater number stood it out; and Mr. Howe particularly, when the king dis- coursed with him alone, told his majesty that he was a minister of the Gospel, and it was his province to preach, and endeavour to do good to the sotils of men ; but that as for meddling with state affairs, he was £is little inclined as he was called to it, and begged to be excused. The same author also observes, ' that upon King James's famous declaration to all his loving subjects for liberty, there followed a vast crowd of congratulatory ad- dresses and acknowledgments, from all sorts of dissenters, complimenting the king in the highest manner, and protesting what mighty returns of loyalty they would make his majesty, for such his favour and indulgence to them. '9 And he adds, 'only the members of the church of England generally were hereat very un- easy.' But Bishop Burnet, who I am apt to think will be most likely to be regarded in the case, gives a quite different representation of the matter. He, speaking of the dissenters, says, ' It was visible to all men, thea the courting them at this time was not from any kind- ness, or good opinion that the king had of them. They needed not to be told, that all the favour expected from popery was once to bring it in, under the colour of a general toleration, till it should be strong enough to set on a general persecution : and therefore, as they could not engage themselves to support such an ar- bitrary prerogative as was now made use of, so neither could they go into any engagements for popery. They did believe that the indignation against the church party, and the kindness to them, were things too imna- tural to last long. So the more considerable among them resolved not to stand at too great a distance from the court, nor to provoke the king so far, as to give him cause to think they were irreconcilable to him, lest they should provoke him to make up matters on any terms with the church party. On the other hand. they resolved not to provoke the church party, or by any ill behaviour of theirs drive them into a reconcilia- tion with the court. '«■ As to the addresses of the dissenters upon this occa- sion, though some of them ran high, j-et the church party had set them the pattern, and therefore it was the less decent in them to make complaints of them. Those of the establishment had in a most luxuriant manner thanked King Charles for dissolving one of the best of parliaments, and as the Earl of Warrington de- clared in his speech, were mighty 'forward in the sur- render of charters ; and in their fulsome addresses and abhorrences, made no other claim to their liberties and r Bp. Burnet't Hutorr of his ovm Times, voL 1. page TOS. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE, civil rights, than as concessions from the crown : telling the king, eveiy one of his commands was stamped with Godls authority,' &c. And the university of Ox- ford in particular, had in one of their public addresses promised King James, that ' they would obey him with- out limitations or restrictions:'^ which was not to be equalled by any thing that came even from the most incautious or the most transported dissenters. And if they did not now preach so much against popery as the churchmen, they may the more easily be excused, because their people did not so much need it. They had little reason to fear that any of their persuasion would be perverted, for that the adhering to their dis- tinguishing principle of the sufficiency of Scripture, would not fail of securing them ; while many of the bishops and doctors of the church of England, had in- stilled into their followers such odd notions, about the power of the church in matters of faith, the apostolical succession and power of bishops, their right to judge of fitness and decency in the worship of God, to which all others must submit, and the binding force of old canons and councils, that it highly concerned them to do all that they were able to deliver them from the consequences which they might easily foresee the Ro- manists would put them upon drawing from such prin- ciples. And the truth of it is, though I han't the least word to say, to the lessening that glorious de- fence of the protestant cause that was at this time made by the writings of the divines of the church party, yet the dissenters may be very well allowed to have taken no small pleasure, in seeing those gentlemen baffle the papists, upon such principles as they might easily discern would help to set the authors themselves more upright than some of them had been before; and in such a case to have offered to take the work out of their hands, had been over-officious, and an indecent intermeddling. However, the king went on with his design, and nothing would satisfy him, but his declaration for liberty must be read in all the churches. The bishops meeting together for consultation, were convinced that their concurring in this step, and sending the declara- tion to all their clergy, and requiring their reading it publicly to the people, would be an owning the dis- pensing power: and therefore they drew up a pefition to his majesty, in which they desired to be excused. This petition was called a libel, and they were sent to the Tower for presenting it. Mr. Howe being at this time invited to dinner by Dr. Sherlock, the Master of the Temple, accepted the invitation, and was very civilly treated ; and there were two or three other clergymen at the table. After dinner, the discourse ran mostly upon the danger the church was at that time in, of being entirely ruined. The Doctor, freely, but pretty abruptly, asked Mr. Howe, what he thought the dissenters would do, sup- posing the preferments of the church should be made vacant, and an offer should be made of filling them up out of their number 1 Mr. Howe was so surprised 8 Bishop Biuret's History of his own Times, vol. 1. p. 620. with such a question as this, which he little expected, that he was at first at a loss for an answer. Where- upon the Doctor drew out his dark and melancholy scheme very distinctly, with all imaginable marks of concern. He told him he thought that the bishops would be as certainly cast, as they were at that time imprisoned in the Tower: that the rest of the clergy, who had so generally refused reading the king's decla- ration, would follow after them : that it was not a thing to be supposed that their places should be suffered to continue vacant : and that no way could be thought of for the filling them up again, but from among the dis- senters: and who know^s, said he, but Mr. Howe may be offered to be Master of the Temple 1 And therefore he intimated he was very desirous to know how they would be inclined to behave, upon such a supposition ; of which he believed him to be as capable of giving an account as any man whatsoever. Mr. Howe told the Doctor, that these were things that were altogether uncertain : but that if it should so happen that matters should fall out according to his fears, he could not pre- tend to answer for the conduct of the dissenters, among whom there were several parties, that acted upon different principles; and that therefore it was most reasonable to suppose, their conduct might be different. He signified to him, that he could answer for none but himself: and that he thought for his part, if things should ever come to the pass he mentioned, he should not baulk an opportunity of more public service, (which he was not aware he had done any thing "o forfeit,) provided it was offered him upon such terms as he had no just reason to except against: but then he added, that as for the emolument thence accruing, he should not be for meddling with that, any otherwise than as a hand to convey it to the legal proprietor. Whereupon the Doctor rose up from his seat, and em- braced him, and said that he had always taken hio for that ingenuous honest man that he now found him to be, and seemed not a little transported with joy. Mr. Howe afterwards telling this passage to a certain great man in the church, to whom the Doctor was well known, and signifying how much he was on a sudden to seek for an answer to a question he so little ex- pected, which was bottomed upon a supposition, that had not so much as once entered into his thoughts be- fore, he immediately made him this reply : Sir, you say you had not once thought of the case, or so much as supposed any thing like it ; but you must give me leave to tell you, if you had studied the case seven years together, you could not have said any thing that had been more to the purpose, or more to the Doctor's satisfaction. When these fears were all blown over, and a happy revolution brought about in 1688, and the Prince of Orange was come to St. James's Palace, the dissenting ministers waited on him in a body, and were intro- duced by the Lords Devonshire, Wharton, and Wilt- shire; at which time, Mr. Howe, in the name of the rest, made a handsome speech, signifying, THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. 'That they professed their grateful sense of his highness's hazardous and heroical expedition, which the favour of Heaven had made so surprisingly pros- perous. 'That they esteemed it a common felicity, that the worthy patriots of the nobility and gentry of this king- dom, had unanimously concurred unto his highness's de- sign, by whose most prudent advice, the administration of public affairs was devolved in this difficult conjunc- ture, into hands which the nation and the world knew to be apt for the greatest undertakings, and so suitable to the present exigence of our case. ' That they promised the utmost endeavours, which in their stations they were capable of affording, for promo- ting the excellent and most desirable ends for which his highness had declared. ' That they added their continual and fervent prayers to the Almighty, for the preservation of his highness's person, and the success of his future endeavours, for the defence and propagation of the protestant interest throughout the Christian world. 'That they should all most willingly have chosen that for the season of paying this duty to his highness, when the lord bishop and the clergy of London at- tended his highness for the same purpose, (which some of them did, and which his lordship was pleased con- descendingly to make mention of to his highness,) had their notice of that intended application been so early, as to make their more general attendance possible to them at that time. ' And that therefore, though they did now appear in a distinct company, they did it not on a distinct account, but on that only which was common to them and to all protestants. ' That there were some of eminent note, whom age or present infirmitiest hindered from coming with them; yet they concurred in the same grateful sense of our com- mon deliverance.' The prince in answer, assured them, ' that he came on purpose to defend the protestant religion, and that it was his o'vvn religion, in which he was born and bred ; the religion of his country, and of his ancestors: and that he was resolved, by the grace of God, always to adhere to it, and to do his utmost endeavours for the de- fence of it, and the promoting a firm union among pro- testants.' In this year 1688, Mr. Howe published a few prac- tical discourses : as, ' A Sermon on John v. 42. directing what we are to do after strict Inquiry, whether or no we truly love God :' and ' Two Sermons preached at Thur- low in Suffolk, on those words, Rom. vi. 13. Yield your- selves to God.' In 1689, he wrote a short letter about the case of the French protestants, which I shall here add, leaving it to the reader to guess (and I cannot myself do more) to whom it was addressed, 'Twas in these words : •Sir, ' BcT that I am learning as much as I can to count t This referred to Mr. Baxter and Dr. Bates. nothing strange among the occurrences of the present time, I should be greatly surprised to find, that divers French protestant ministers, fled hither for their con- sciences and religion, who have latitude enough to con- form to the rites of the church of England, do accuse others of their brethren, who are fled hither on the same accoimt, but have not that latitude, a^ schismatics, only for practising according to the principles and usages of their own church, which at home were common to them both ; and, as schismatics, judge them unworthy of any relief here. Their common enemy never yet passed so severe a judgment on any of them, that they should be famished. This is put into the hands of the appellants from this sentence, unto your more equal judgment. And it needs do no more than thus briefly to represent their case, and me. Most honoured Sir, Your most obliged, and most humble Servant, Apmt"^' • JOHN HOWE.' This year there were many and warni debates in the two houses of Lords and Commons, about a compre- hension, and an indulgence ; for bills were brought in for both, and both were canvassed. Some were so nai- row-spirited and so imgenerous, as, forgetting their pro- mises and repeated declarations in the time of their dis- tress, from which they were just so wonderfully deli- vered, to be for still keeping the dissenters under a brand. Mr. Howe therefore at this time fairly represented their case, and strenuously argued upon it, in a single sheet of paper, which was printed, and is very fit to be transmitted to posterity. The case of the Protestant Dissenters represented and ar- gued. ' They are under one common obligation with the rest of mankind, by the universal law of nature, to worship God in assemblies. ' Men of all sorts of religions, that have ever obtained in the world, Jews, Pagans, Mahometans, Christians, have in their practice acknowledged this obligation. Nor can it be understood, how such a practice shoiild be so universal, otherwise than from the dictate and impression of the imiversal law. 'Whereas the religion professed in England is that of reformed Christianity, some things are annexed to the allowed public worship, which are acknowledged to be no parts thereof, nor in themselves necessary; but which the dissenters judge to be in some part sinful. ' They cannot therefore, with good conscience towards God, attend wholly and solely upon the public worship which the laws do appoint. ' The same laws do strictly forbid their assembling t© worship God otherwise. ' Which is in effect the same thing, as if they who made, or shall continue such laws, should plainly say. If you will not consent with us in our superadded rites and modes against your consciences, you shaL not XZXll THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. ■worship God; or if you will not accept of our additions to the Christian religion, you shall not be Christians: and manifestly tends to reduce to paganism a great part of a Christian nation. ' They have been wont therefore to meet however in distinct assemblies, and to worship God in a way which their consciences could approve; and have many years continued so to do, otherwise than as they have been hin- de; ed by violence. ' It is therefore upon the whole fit to inquire, ' Qu. 1. Whether they are to be blamed for their hold- ing distinct meetings for the worship of God 1 ' For answer to this, it cannot be expected that all the controversies should be here determined, which have been agitated about the lawfulness of each of those things which have been added to the Christian religion and worship, by the present constitution of the church of England. ' But supposing they were none of them simply un- lawful, while yet the misinformed minds of the dissen- ters could not judge them lawful, though they have made it much their business to inquire and search; being urged also by severe sufferings, which through a long tract of time they have undergone, not to refuse any means that might tend to their satisfaction ; they could have nothing else left them to do, than to meet and wor- ship distinctly as they have. ' For they could not but esteem the obligation of the universal, natural, divine law, by Avhich they were bound solemnly to worship God, less questionable than that of a law, which was only positive, topical, and human, re- quiring such and such additaments to their worship, and prohibiting their worship without them. ' The church of England, (as that part affects to be called,) distinguished from the rest by those additionals to Christian religion, (pretended to be indifferent, and so confessed unnecessary,) hath not only sought to en- gross to itself the ordinances of divine worship, but all civil power. So that the privileges that belong either to Christian or human society are enclosed, and made pe- culiar to such as are distinguished by things that in them- selves can signify nothing to the making of persons either better Christians, or better men. ' Qu. 2. Whether the laws enjoining such additions to our religion, as the exclusive terms of Christian worship and communion, ought to have been made, when it is acknowledged on all hands, the things to be added were before not necessary ; and when it is known a great number judge them sinful, and must thereby be restrained from worshipping the true and living Godi ' Ans. The question to any of common sense, answers itself. For it is not put concerning such as dissent from any part of the substance of worship which God hath commanded, but concerning such additions as he never commanded. And there are sufficient tests to distinguish such dissenters from those that deny any substantial part of religion, or assert any thing con- u Vindication of some Protestant Principles, 4te. p. 52. trary thereto. Wherefore to forbid such to worship that God that made them, because they can't receive your devised additions, is to exclude that which is ne- cessary, for the mere want of that which is unneces- sary. ' And where is that man that will adventure to stand forth, and avow the hindering of such persons from pay- ing their homage to the God that made them, if we thus expostulate the matter on God's behalf and their own 1 Will you cut off from God his right in the creatures he hath made 1 Will you cut off from them the means of their salvation upon these terms 1 What reply can the matter admit 1 ' 'Tis commonly alleged that great deference is to be paid to the laws, and that we ought to have forborne our assemblies, till the public authority recalled the laws against them : and we will say the same thing, when it is well proved, that they who made such laws, made the world too. ' And by whose authority were such laws made 1 Is there any that is not from God 1 and hath God given any man authority to make laws against himself, and to deprive him of his just rights from his own crea- tures! ' Nor if the matter be well searched into, could there be so much as a pretence of authority derived for such purposes from the people, whom every one now ac- knowledges the first receptacle of derived governing power. God can, 'tis true, lay indisputable obligations by his known laws, upon every conscience of man about religion, or any thing else. And such as repre- sent any people, can, according to the constitution of the government, make laws for them, about the things they intrust them with : but if the people of England be asked man by man, will they say they did intrust to their representatives, their religion, and their con- sciences, to do with them what they please 1 When it is your own turn to be represented by others, is this part of the trust you commit 1 What Dr. Sherlock" worthily says concerning a bishop, he might (and par- ticularly after, doth) say concerning every other man, He can be no more represented in a council, than at the day of judgment : every man's soul and conscience must be in his own keeping ; and can be represented by no man. ' It ought to be considered that Christianity, wherein it superadds to the law of nature, is all matter of revela- tion. And 'tis well known that even among pagans, in the settling rites and institutes of religion," revelation was pretended at least, upon an implied principle, that in such matters human power could not oblige the peo- ple's consciences. ' We must be excused therefore, if we have in our practice expressed less reverence for laws made by no authority received either from God or man. 'We are therefore injuriously reflected on, when it is imputed to us, that we have by the use of our liberty acknowledged an illegal dispensing power. We have w As by Numa iVom his Egeria. And their priests, to whom the legulatioa 01 such matters was left, were eenerally believed to be inspired. THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. done no other thing herein, than we did when no dispen- sation was given or pretended, in conscience of duty to him that gave us our breath : nor did therefore practise otherwise, because we thought those laws dispensed with, but because we thought thein not laws. Whereupon little need remains of inquiring further, ' Qu. 3. Whether such laws should be continued 1 Against which, besides what may be collected from that which hath been said, it is to be considered, that what is most principally grievous to us, was enacted by that parliament, that, as we have too much reason to believe, suffered itself to be dealt with to enslave the nation, in other respects as well as this ; and which (to his immortal honour) the noble Earl of Danby procured to be dissolved, as the first step towards our national deli- verance. ' And let the tenour be considered of that horrid law, by which our Magna Charta was torn in pieces ; the worst and most infamous of mankind, at our own ex- pense, hired to accuse us ; multitudes of perjuries com- mitted, convictions made without a jury, and without any hearing of the persons accused; penalties inflict- ed, goods rifled, estates seized and embezzled, houses broken up, families disturbed, often at unseasonable hours of the night, without any cause, or shadow of a cause, if only a malicious villain would pretend to sus- pect a meeting there ! No law in any other case like this ! As if to worship God without those additions, which were confessed unnecessary, were a greater crime than theft, felony, murder, or treason ! Is it for our reputation to posterity, that the memory of such a law should be continued 1 ' And are we not yet awakened, and our eyes opened enough to see, that the making and execution of the laws, by which we have suffered so deeply for many by-past years, was only, that protestants might destroy protestants, and the easier work be made for the introduction of po- pery, that was to destroy the residue 1 ' Nor can any malice deny, or ignorance of observing Englishmen overlook, this plain matter of fact. After the dissolution of that before-mentioned parliament, dissenters were much caressed, and endeavoured to be drawn into a subserviency to the court designs, espe- cially in the election of after-parliaments. Notwith- standing which, they every where so entirely and unanimously fell in with the sober part of the nation, in the choice of such persons for the three parliaments that next succeeded, (two held at Westminster, and that at Oxford,) as it was known would, and who did, most generously assert the liberties of the nation, and the protestant religion. Which alone (and not our mere dis- sent from the church of England in matters of religion, wherein Charles II. was sufficiently known to be a prince of great mdifferency) drew upon us, soon afler the dissolution of the last of those parliaments, that dreadfi\l storm of persecution, that destroyed not a small number of lives in gaols, and ruined multitudes of fa- milies. ' Let English freemen remember, what they cannot but know, that it was for our firm adherence to the civil interests of the nation, (not for our different modes of religion from the legal way, though the laws gave that advantage against us, which they did not against others,) that we endured the calamities of so many years. ' When by the late king some relaxation was given us, what arts and insinuations have been used with us, to draw us into a concurrence to designs tending to the pre- judice of the nation! And with how little effect upon the generality of us, it must be great ignorance not to know, and great injustice to deny. 'But he that knoweth all things, knoweth that though, in such circumstances, there was no opportunity for our receiving public and authorized promises, when we were all under the eye of watchful jealousy ; yet as great assurances as were possible, were given us by some that we hope will now remember it, of a future established security from our former pressures. We were told over and over, when the excellent Heer Fagel's letter came to be privately communicated from hand to hand, how easily better things would be had for us, than that encou- raged papists to expect, if ever that happy change should be brought about, which none have now beheld with greater joy than we. ' We are loth to injure those who have made us hope for better, by admitting a suspicion that we shall now be disappointed and deceived, (as we have formerly been, and we know by M'hom,) or that we shall suffer from them a religious slavery, for whose sakes we have suffered so grievous things, rather than do the least thing that might tend to the bringing upon them a civil slavery. ' We cannot but expect from Englishmen that they be just and true. We hope not to be the only instances whereby the Anglica fides and the P^t?^^ca shall be thought all one. ' But if we, who have constantly desired, and as we have had opportunity endeavoured the saving of the na- tion, must however be ruined, not to greaten (one hair) the wealth and dignity of it, but only to gratify the hu- mour of them who would yet destroy it ; we, who are competently inured to sufferings, shall through God's mercy be again enabled to endure: but he that sits in the heavens, will in his own time judge our cause, and we will wait his pleasure; and we hope suffer all that can be inflicted, rather than belraj' the cause of reformed Chris- tianity in the world. ' But our affairs are in the hands of men of worth and honour, who apprehend how little grateful a name they should leave to posterity, or obtain now with good men of any persuasion, if, under a pretence of kindness to us, they should now repeat the arts of ill men, in an ill time. Great minds will think it beneath them to sport themselves with their own cunning, in deceiving other men; which were really in the present case too thin not to be seen through, and may be the e^v at- tainment of any man, that hath enough of opportunity, and integrity little enough for such purposes. And 'tis as much too gross to endeavour to abuse the au- thority of a nation, by going about to make that stoop THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. to so mean a thing, as to make a show of intending what they resolve to their utmost shall never be. ' But some may think, by concessions to us, the church of England will be ruined, and a great advantage given to the bringing in of poper}\ ' To which we say, the generality of the dissenters differ from the church of England, in no substantials of doctrine and worship, no nor of government, provided it be so managed, as to attain its true acknowledged end : the favouring of us therefore will as much ruin the church, as its enlargement and additional strength will signify to its ruin. ' And doth not the world know, that wherein we differ from them, we differ from the papists tool And that for the most part, wherein they differ from us, they seem to agree with them 1 ' We acknowledge their strong, brave, and prosperous opposition to popery: but they have opposed it by the things wherein they agree with us. Their differences from us are no more a fence against popery, than an en- closure of straw is against a flame of fire. ' But 'tis wont to be said, we agree not among our- selves, and know not what we would have. * ' And do all that go under the name of the church of England agree among themselves 1 We can show more considerable disagreements among them, than any can between the most of us and a considerable part of them. They all agree, 'tis true, in conformity ; and we all agree in non-conformity. And is not this merely accidental to Christianity and protestantism '? and herein is it not well known that the far greater part of reformed Chris- tendom do more agree with us 1 ' An arbitrary line of uniformity in some little acci- dents, severs a small part of the Christian world from all the rest. How unreasonably is it expected that therefore all the rest must in every thing else agree among themselves! Suppose any imaginary line to cut off a little segment from any part of the terrestrial globe ; 'tis as justly expected that all the rest should be of one mind. If one part of England be tailors, they might as well expect that all the people besides should agree to be of one profession. 'Perhaps some imagine it dishonourable to such as have gone before them in the same ecclesiastical stations and dignities, if now any thing should be altered, which their judgment did before approve and think fit. ' But we hope that temptation will not prove invincible, viz. of so excessive a modesty as to be afraid of seeming wiser, or better natured, or of a more Christian temper than their predecessors. ' But the most of us do agree not only with one ano- ther, but, in the great things above mentioned, with the church of England too : and in short, that the reproach may cea.se for ever with those that count it one, they will find with us, when they please .to try, a very extensive agreement on the terms of King Charles II.'s declaration about ecclesiastical affairs, in 1660. ' Qu. 4. Whether it be reasonable to exclude all that in every thing conform not to the church of England, from any part or share of the civil power 1 ' A71S. The difference or nonconformity of many is so minute, that it would be as reasonable to exclude all whose hair is not of this or that colour. And what if we should make a distermination, by the decision this way or that of any other disputed question, that may be of as small concernment to religion '( suppose it be that of eating blood, for the decision whereof one way, there is more pretence from God's word, than for any point of the disputed conformity : would it not be a wise constitu- tion, that whosoever thinks it lawful to eat black-pudding, shall be capable of no office, &c. ' But we tremble to think of the exclusive sacramental test, brought down as low as to the keeper of an ale- house. Are all fit to approach the sacred table, whom the fear of ruin or hope of gain may bring thither 1 We cannot but often remember with horror, what happened three or four years ago. A man that led an ill life, but frequented the church, was observed not to come to the sacrament, and pressed by the officers to come ; he yet declined, knowing himself imfit ; at length, being threat- ened and terrified, he came; but said to some present at the time of the solemn action, that he came only to avoid being undone, and took them to witness that what he there received, he took only as common bread and wine, not daring to receive them as the body and blood of Christ. 'Tis amazing, that among Chris- tians, so venerable an institution should be prostituted to the serving of so mean purposes, and so foreign to its true end ! and that doing it after the maimer of the church of England must be the qualification ! as if Eng- land were another Christendom; or it were a greater thing to conform in every punctilio to the rules of this church, than of Christ himself! ' But we would fain know whose is that holy table 1 is it the table of this or that party, or the Lord's table 1 if the Lord's, are not persons to be admitted or excluded upon his terms 1 Never can there be union or peace in the Christian world till we take down our arbitrary en- closures, and content ourselves with those which our common Lord hath set. If he falls under a curse that alters a man's landmark, to alter God's is not likely to infer a blessing. ' The matter is clear as the light of the sim, that as many persons of excellent worth, sobriety, and godli- ness, are entirely in the commimion of the church of England, so there are too many of a worse character, that are of it too ; and divers prudent, pious, and sober- minded persons that are not of it. Let common reason be consulted in this case. Suppose the tables turned, and that the rule were to be made the contrary way, viz. that to do this thing, but not by any means after the manner of the church of England, were to be the qualification: and now suppose one of meaner endow- ments, as a man and a Christian, do what is required, and not in the way of the church of England ; and another that is of much better, does the same thing in that way; were it suitable to prudence or justice, that because it is done after the way of the church of Eng- land, a fitter man should be reckoned unqualified 1 and one of less value be taken for qualified, because he THE LIFE OF MR. JOHN HOWE. does it a different way 1 Then Ls all that soiid weight of wisdom, diligence, sobriety, and goodness, to be weighed down by a feather. ' It must surely be thought the prudence of any go- vernment, to comprehend as many useful persons as it can, and no more to deprive itself of the service of such for any thing less considerable than those qualifications are, by which they are useful, than a man would tear off from himself the limbs of his body, for a spot on the skin. ' And really if, in our circumstances, we thus narrow our interest, all the rest of the world will say, that they who would destroy us, do yet find a way to be our in- structors, and our common enemies do teach us our politics. ' P. S. The names of Mr. Hale, of Eton college, and of a later most renowned bishop of the church of England, who asserted this principle, that " if things be imposed under the notion of indifferent, which many think sinful, and a schism follow thereupon, the imposers are the schismatics," will be great in England, as long as their writings shall live, and good sense can be understood in them.' About this time, some had great expectations from the meetings of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners who were to prepare matters for the convocation. » Mr. Howe was well acquainted, and had free and frequent conversation with several of them, but found such a spirit had got the ascendant among the dignified clergy, of whom the convocation is made up, that there was no room for any thing like an accommodation of the matters in difference, which he often afterwards lamented, where he could use freedom. At length, on May 24th, this year, the ' Act for ex- empting their Majesties' Protestant Subjects, dissenting from the Church of England, from the Penalties of cer- tain Laws,' received the royal assent. The dissenters were hereupon contented and thankful; but the high- flown clergy generally regretted the passing of this act. The author of the Memoirs of the Life of Dr. Robert South, owns in so many words, that that Doctor by no means liked it.y And it was the same as to a great many others of his temper and principles. Se- veral years after. Dr. Henry Sacheverel being im- peached by the Commons of England, the second ar- ticle of the charge against him alleged, that he had ' suggested and maintained, that this toleration granted by law, was unreasonable, and the allowance of it un- warrantable.' (1.) Upon which occasion. Sir Peter King (one of the managers for the Commons) publicly declared ' this toleration to be one of the principal con- sequences of the revolution.' (2.) And the Lord Lech- mere (who was another) declared, ' that the Commons esteemed the toleration of protestant dissenters to be one of the earliest and happiest effects of the revolu- X See a particular account of the proceedings of these comniissioners, m the Abndginent of Mr. Baxter's Life, vol. i. p. 452. y Page 116. z (1.) Trial of Dr Henry Sacheverel, p. 4. (2.) Trial, p. T?. (3.) Trial, p. 24. (4 ) Trial, p 91. (5.) Trial, p. 49. a Mr. Matthew Henry, in his short account of the Life of Mr. Riclianl Stret- tion, wisely calculated for the support and strengthen- ing the protestant interest, the great end of the revolu- tion itself.' (3.) And Mr. Cowper (who was also another) owned, that ' this indulgence was required from the legislators, as they were Christians, and as they were men professing humanity and good-will towards one another.' (4.) And the attorney-general said, that this was ' one of the most necessary acts for the good of the kingdom.' (5.) And hereupon. Dr. Sacheverel's doc- trine of wholesome severities was publicly branded. ^ In order to the preventing (if it might be) flights of this kind, or any thing that might be extravagant in the opposite extreme, Mr. Howe verj' prudently, soon after the toleration act passed, published another sheet of paper, which he intituled, ' Humble Requests both to Conformists and Dissenters touching their Temper and Behaviour toward each other, upon the lately passed Indulgence.''^ And this also deserves to be preserved to posterity. It is there moved, ' 1. That we do not oveivrasignify our differences, or coimt them greater than they really are. I speak now (saj's Mr. Howe) of the proper differences which the rule itself makes, to which the one sort conforms, and the other conforms not. Remember that there are dif- ferences on both parts, among themselves, incompar- ably greater than these, by which the one sort differs from the other. There are differences in doctrinal sen- timents that are much greater. How inconceivably greater is the difference between good men and bad ! between being a lover of the blessed God, the Lord of heavren and earth, and an enemy ! a real subject of Christ, and of the devil ! Have we not reason to ap- prehend there are of both these, on each side 1 Let us take heed of having our minds tinctured with a wrong notion of this matter, as if this indulgence divided England into two Christendoms, or distinguished rather between Christians and Mahometans, as some men's Cyclopic fancies have an tmlucky art to represent things ; creating ordinary men and things into monsters and prodigious shapes at their own pleasure. It has been a u.sual sajing on both sides, that they were (in com- parison) but little things we differed about, or circum- stantial things. Let us not unsay it, or suffer a habit of mind to slide into us, that consists not with it. Though we must not go against a judgment of conscience in the least thing, yet let us not confound the true differences of things, but what are really lesser things, let them go for such. ' 2. Let us hereupon carefully abstain from judging each other's state God-ward upon these differences : for hereby we shall both contradict our common rule, and ourselves. When men make conscience of small and doubtful things on the one hand, and the other, about which they differ, blessed Grod, how little conscience ton, that is subjoined to his Funeral Sermon for liim. n.«crihes this paper to Mr. Strettoii. and intimatei! that he had it from a near relation of his. Iliat he was tlie author of it : but this I have goo id • See the character given of lUem by Cicero, Orat. pro. Marf.. Foil. 6 DEDICATION. case of their refusal : which punishment (as is testified by Julius Caesar*) they accounted the most grievous imagi- nable. And it needs not be said in what part of the world the same engine hath had the same power with men, even since they obtained to be called Chrbiian.. Which, while it hath been of such force with them, who, notwithstand- ing, persisted in courses of the most profligate wickedness ; whence could their religion, such as it was, proceed, save only from a dread of divine revenge 1 What else could it design (though that most vainly) but the averting it, without even altering their own vile course 1 Wow let this be the account and estimate of religion; only to propitiate the Deity towards flagitious men, still re- maining so; and how monstrous a notion doth it give its of God, that he is one that by such things can ever be ren- dered favourable to such men ! Let it not be so, (while you sever its true and proper end also,) how most despicably inept and foolish a thing doth it make religion ! A compages and frame of merely scenical observances and actions, intended to no end at all. In a word, their religion is nothing but foolery, which is not taken up and prosecuted with a sincere aim to the bettering their spirits ; the making them holy, peaceful, meek, humble, merciful, .studious of doing good, and the composing them into temples, some way meet for the residence of the blessed God; with design and expectation to have his intimate, vital presence, settled and made permanent there. The materials and preparation of which temple are no where entirely contained and directed, but in the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: as, hereafter, we may with divine assistance labour to evince. The greater is the ignominy done to the temple of God, and the Christian name, by only titular and nick-named Christianity. Will they pretend themselves the temple of God, partakers in the high privilege and dignity of the Emmanuel, (in whom most emi- nently the Deity inhabiteth,) who are discernibly, to all that know them, as great strangers to God, and of a temper of spirit as disagreeing to him, of as worldly spirits, as unmortified passions, as proud, wrathful, vain-glorious, en- vious, morose, merciless, disinclined to do good, as any other men 1 When Grod cleanses his house, and purges his floor, where will these be foitnd 1 And for this temple itself, it is a structure whereto there is a concurrence of truth and holiness ; the former letting in (it were otherwise a darksome, disorderly, uncomforlable house) a vital, directive, formative light, to a heavenly, calm, God-like frame of spirit, composed and made up of the latter. It is this temple, my Lord, which I would invite you both to continue your respect unto in others, and, more and more, to prepare and beautify in yourself. You will find little, in this part, ofl'ered to your view, more than only its vestibulum, or rather a very plain (if not rude) frontispiece ; with the more principal pillars that must support the whole frame. Nor, whereas (by way of introduction to the discourse of this temple, and as most fundamental to the being of it) the existence of the great Inhabitant is so largely insisted on, that I think that altogether a needless labour. Of aH the sects and parties in the world, (though there are few that avow it, and fewer, if any, that are so, by any formed judgment, unshaken by a suspicion and dread of the contrary,) that of atheists we have reason enough to suppose the most numerous, as ha- ving difiused and spread it.self through all the rest. And though, with the mo.st, under disguise, yet uncovering, with too many, its ugly face : and scarce ever more than in our own days. Wherefore, though it hath never been in any age more strongly impugned ; yet, because the opposition can never be too common, to so common an enemy, this additional endeavour may prove not wholly out of season. And the Epicurean atheist is chiefly designed against in this discourse ; that being the atheism most in fashion. Nor is any thing more pertinent to the design of the discourse intended concerning God's temple ; which, import- ing worship to be done to him, requires, first, a belief that he is. And surely the [E?] inscribed of old, as Plutarch tells us, on the Delphic Temple; signifying, (as, after divers other conjectures, he concludes it to do,) Thou dost exist, is an inscription much more fitly set in view, at our en- trance into the temple of the living God, whose name is, I AM. Amidst the pleasant entertainments of which temple, (made more intimate to you than human discourse can make it,') may you spend many happy days in this world, as a preparative and introduction to a happier eternity in the other. Whereto he is under many and deep obligations, by any means, to contribute to his uttermost, who must (especially in the offices relating to this temple) profess himself. My honoured Lord, Your Lordship's most humble, Devoted Servant, JOHN HOWE. * CnmTBtnl. bh. S. THE LIVING TEMPLE PART I. CONCERNING GOD'S EXISTENCE, AND HIS CONVERSABLENESS WITH MAN. CHAPTER I. THIS NOTION COMMON. AUTHORITIES NEEDLESS. INSIGNIFICANT WITH THE ATHEISTICAL, WHO HAVE MADE IT MORE NECESSARY TO DEFEND RELIGION, AND A TEMPLE IN GENERAL, THAN THIS, OR THAT. BETTER DEFENDED AGAINST THEM BY PRACTICE AND USE, THAN ARGUMENT, WHEREOF THEY ARE INCAPABLE. OFTEN DISPUTES OF ITS PRINCIPLES NOT NECESSARY TO THE PRAC- TICE OF RELIGION. SOME CONSIDERATION OF THOSE SUPPOSED IN THE GENERAL NOTION OF A TEMPLE, PERTINENT (hOWEVEB) TO THIS DISCOURSE. I. It is so well known that this notion hath long obtained in the world, that we need not quote sayings to avouch it ; wherewith not the sacred writings only, but others, even of pagans themselves, would plentifully furnish us. But as authorities are, in a plain case, needless to un- Erejudiced minds ; so will they be useless to the prejudiced, e the case never so plain. Nor is any prejudice deeper, or less vincible, than that of profane minds against religion. With such, it would in the present argument signify little, to tell them wha^ hath been said or thought before by any others. Not because it is their general course to be so very circumspect and wary, as never to approve or assent to any thing, unless upon the clearest and most convinc- ing demonstration : but from their peculiar dislike of those things only, that are of this special import and tendency. Discourse to them what you will of « temple, and it will be nauseous and unsavoury : not as being cross to their reason, (which they are as little curious to gratify as any other sort of men,) but to their ill humour, and the dis- affected temper of their mind; whence also (though thej' cannot soon or easily get that mastery over their under- standings herein, yet because they would fain have it so) they do what they can to believe religion nothing else but the effect of timorous fancy, and a temple, consequently, one of the most idle impertinences in the world. To these, the discussion of the notion we have proposed to consider, will be thought a beating the air, an endeavour to give consistency to a shadow. And if their reason and power could as well serve their purpose as their anger and scorn, they would soon tear up the holy ground on which a temple is set, and wholly subvert the sacred frame. I speak of suck as deny the existence of the ever-blessed Deity ; or (if they are not arrived to that express and formed misbelief) whose hearts are inclined, and ready to deter- mine, even against their misgiving and more su.spicious minds, there is no God: who, if they cannot a^ yet believe, do wish there were none; and so strongly, as in a great degree to prepare them for that belief. That would fain banish him not only out of all their thoughts, but the world too ; and to whom it is so far from being a grateful sound, that the tabernacle of God is with men on earth, that they grudge to allow him a place in heaven. At least, if they are willing to admit the existence of any God at all, do say to him. Depart from us; and would have him so confined to heaven, that he and they may have nothing to do with one another: and do therefore rack their impious wits to serve their hypothesis either way; that under its protection they may securely in- dulge themselves in a course, upon which they find the apprehension of a God, interesting himself in human affairs, would have a very unfavourable and threatening aspect. They are therefore constrained to take great pains with themselves, to discipline and chastise their minds and un- derstandings to that tameuess and patience, as contentedly to suffer the rasing out of their most natural impressions and sentiments. And they reckon they have arrived to a very heroical perfection, when they can pass a scoff upon any thing, that carries the least signification with it of the fear of God; and can be able to laugh at the weak and squeamish folly of those softer and effeminate minds, that will trouble themselves with any thoughts or cares, how to please and propitiate a Deity : and doubt not but they have made all safe, and effectually done their busi- ness, when they have learned to put the ignominious titles of frenzy, and folly, upon devotion, in whatsoever dress or garb ; to cry canting, to any serious mention of the name of God, and break a bold adventurous jest upon any the most sacred mysteries, or decent and awful solemnities, of religion. II. These content not themselves to encounter this or that sect, but mankind ; and reckon it too mean and in- glorious an achievement to overturn one sort of temple or another ; but would down with them all, even to the ground. And they are bound, in reason and justice, to pardon the emulation which they provoke, of vying with them as to the universality of their design; and not to regret it, if they find there be any that think it their duty to wave a while serving the temple of this or that party, as less con- siderable, to defend that on^e wherein all men have a com- mon interest and concernment ; since matters are brought to that exigency and hazard, that it seems less necessary to contend aboiit this or tliat mode of religion, as whether there ought to be any at all. What was said of a former age, could never better agree to an}', than our own, "that none was ever more fruitful of religions, and barren of religion or true piety." It concerns us to consider, whether the fertility of those many doth not as well cause as ac- company a barrenness in this one. And since ihe iniquity of the world luith made that too suitable, which were otherwise unseemly in itself, to speak of a temple as a fortified j)lace, whose own sacredness ought ever to have been its sufficient fortification, it is time to be aware lest our forgetful heat and zeal in the defence of this or that oiU-tcork, do expose (not to say betray) the main fortress to assault and danger. Whilst it hath long been, by this 8 THE LIVmG TEMPLE. Part I. means, a neglected, forsaken thing ; and is more decayed by vacancy and disuse, than it could ever have been by the most forcible battery ; so as even to promise the rude assailant an easy victory. Who fears to insult over an empty, dispirited, dead religion 1 which alive and shining in its native glory, (as that temple doth, which is compacted of lively stones uni'.ed to the living corner stone,) bears with it a magrnificence and state that would check a profane look, and dazzle the presumptuous eye that durst venture to glance at it obliquely, or with disrespect. The temple of the living God, manifestly animated by his vital presence, would not only dismay opposition, but command veneration also; and be both its own ornament and defence. Nor can it be destitute of that presence, if we ourselves render it not inhospitable, and make not its proper inhabitant be- come a stranger at home. If we preserve in ourselves a capacity of the divine presence, and keep the temple of God in a posture fit to receive him, he would then no more forsake it, than the soul a sound and healthy body, not violated in any vital part. But if he forsake it once, it then becomes an exposed and despised thing. And as the most impotent, inconsiderable enemy can securely trample on the dead body of the greatest hero, that alive carried awfulness and terror in his looks; so is the weak- spirited atheist become as bold now, as he was willing be- fore, to make rude attempts upon the temple of God, when He hath been provoked to leave it, who is its life, strength, and gloiy. III. Therefore as they who will not be treacherous to the interest of God and man, must own an obligation and ne- cessity to apply themselves to the serious endeavour of restoring the life and honour of religion ; so will the case itself be found to point out to us the proper course in order hereto. That is, that it must rather be endeavoured by practice, than by disputation; by contending, everyone with himself, to excite the love of God in his own breast, rather than with the profane adversary to kindle his anger, more aiming to foment and cherish the domestic, continual fire of God's temple and altar, than transmit a flame into the enemies' camp. For what can this signify 1 And it seldom fails to be the event of disputing against prejudice, (especially of disputing for the sum of religion at once against tlie prepossession of a sensual profane temper, and a violent inclination and resolvedness to be wicked.) to beget more wrath than conviction, and sooner to incense the impatient wretch than enlighten him. And by how much the more cogent and enforcing reasonings are used, and the less is left the confounded, baffled creatures to say, on behalf of a cause so equally deplorate and vile ; the more he finds himself concerned to fortify his obstinate will ;■ and supply his want of reason with resolution ; to find out the most expedite ways of diverting, from what he hath no mind to consider; to entertain himself with the most stupifying pleasures, (that must serve the same turn that opium is wont to do in the case of broken, un- quiet sleep,) or whatsoever may most effectually serve to mortify any divine principle, and destroy all sense of God out of his soul. And how grateful herein, and meritorious often, are the assistant railleries of servile, and it may be mercenary, wits! How highly shall he oblige them, that can furnish out a libel against religion, and help them with more arti- ficial .spite to blaspheme what they cannot disprove ! And now shall the scurrilous pasquil and a few bottles, work a more effectual confutation of^ religion, than all the reason and argument in the world shall be able to countervail. This proves too often the unhappy issue of misapplying what is most excellent in its own "kind and place, to" im- proper and incapable subjects. IV. And who sees not this to be the case with the modern atheist, who hath been pursued with that strength and vigour of argume-nt, even in our own days, that would have baffled persons of any other temper than their own, into shame and silence 1 And so as no other support hath been left to irreligion, than asenseless stupidity, an obstinate resolvedness not to consider, a faculty to stifle an argument with a jest, to charm their reason by sensual softnesses into a dead sleep; with a strict and circumspect care that it may never awake into any exercise above the condition of dozed and half-witted persons > or if it do, by the next debauch, presently to lay it fast again. So that the very principle fails in this sort of men, whereto, in reasoning, we should appeal, and apply ourselves. And it were al- most the same thing, to offer arguments to the senseless images, or forsaken carcasses of men. It belongs to the grandeur of religion to neglect the impotent assaults of these men : as it is a piece of glory, and bespeaks a worthy person's right understanding, and just value of himself, to disdain the combat with an incompetent or a foiled enemy. It is becoming and seemly, that the grand, ancient, and received tiuth, which tends to, and is the reason of, the godly life, do sometimes keep state ; and no more descend to perpetual, repeated janglings with every scurrilous and impertinent trifler, than a great and redoubted prince would think it fit to dispute the rights of his crown with a drunken, distracted fool, or a madman. Men of atheistical persuasions having abandoned their reason, need what will more powerfully strike their sense — storms and whirlwinds, flames and thunderbolts; things not so apt immediately to work upon their understanding, as their fear, and that will astonish, that they may convince, that the great God makes himself known by the judgments which he executes. Stripes are for the back of fools (as they are justly styled, that say in their hearts. There is no God.) But if it may be hoped any gentler n:ethod may prove effectual with any of them, we are rather to expect the good efiect from the steady, uniform course of their actions and conversation, who profess reverence and devo- tedness to an eternal Being; and the correspondence of their u-ay, to their avowed principle, that acts them on agreeably to itself, and may also incur the sense of the beholder, and gradually invite and draw his observation; than from the most severe and necessitating argumenta- tion that exacts a sudden assent. V. At least, in a matter of so clear and commanding evidence, reasoning many times looks like trifling; and out of a hearty concernedness and jealousy for the honour of religion, one would rather it should march on with an heroical neglect of bold and malapert cavillers, and only demonstrate and recommend itself by its own vigorous, comely, coherent course, than make itself cheap by dis- cussing at every turn its principles : as that philosopher who thought it the fittest way to confute the sophisms against motion, only by walking. But we have nothing so considerable objected against practical religion, as well to deserve the name of a. sophism ; at least, no sophism so perplexing in the case of religious, as of natural, motion ; jeers and sarcasms are the most weighty, convincing arguments; and let the deplorate crew niock on. There are those in the world, that will think they have, however, reason enough to persist in the way of godliness ; and that have already laid the founda- tion of that reverence which they bear to a Deity, more strongly than to be shaken and beaten off from it by a jest ; and therefore will not think it necessary to have the princi- ples of their religion vindicated afresh, every time they are called to the practice of it. For surely thej^ would be re- ligious upon very uncertain terms, that will think them- selves concerned to suspend or discontinue their course as oft as they are encountered in it with a wry mouth or a distorted look; or that are apt to be put out of conceit with their religion by the laughter of a fool ; or by their cavils and taunts against the rules and principles of it, whom only their own sensual temper, and impatience of serious thoughts, have made willing to have them false. That any indeed should commence religious, and persist with blind zeal in this or that discriminating profession, without ever considering why they should do so, is un- manly and absurd; especially when a gross ignorance of the true rea.sons and grounds of religion shall be shadowed over with a pretended awe and scrupulousness to inquire about things so sacred. And an inquisitive temper shall have an ill character put upon it, as if rational and profane were words of the same signification. Or, as if reason and judgment were utterly execrated, and an unaccount- able, enthusiastic fuiy, baptized and hallowed, the only principle of religion. But when the matter hath un- dergone already a severe inquisition, and been search- ed to the bottom; principles have been examined; the strength and firmness hath been tried of its deepest and Chap. II. THE LIVING TEMPLE. most finKlamental grounds, and an approving judgment been past in the case, and a resolution thereupon taken up, of a suitable and correspondent practice; alter all this, it were a vain and unwarrantable curiosity, to be perpetu- all}' perplexing one's easy path with new and suspicious researches into the most acknowledged things. Nor were this course a little prejudicial to the design and end of religion, (if we will allow it any at all,) the refining of our minds, and the fitting us for a happy eternity. For when shall that building be finished, the foundations whereof must be every day torn up anew, upon pretence of further caution, and for more diligent search 1 Or when ■will he reach his journey's end, that is continually vexed (and often occasioned to go back from whence he came) by causeless anxieties about his way ; and whether ever he began a right course, yea or no 1 Many go securely on in a course most ignominiously wicked and vile, without ever debating the matter with themselves, or inquiring if there be any rational principle to justify or bear them out. Much more may they, with a cheerful confidence, persist in their well-chosen way, that have once settled their resolutions about it upon firm and assured grotmds and principles, without running over the same course of reasonings with themselves in reference to each single, devotional act; or thinking it necessary every time they are to pray, to have it proved to them, there is a God. And because yet many of these do need excitation ; and though they are not destitute of pious sen- timents and inclinations, and have somewhat in them of the ancient foundations and frame of a temple, have yet, by neglect, sulTered it to grow into decay. It is therefore the principal intendment of this discourse, not to assert the principles of religion against those with whom they have no place, but to propound what may some way tend to rein- force and strengthen them, -where they visibly languish ; and awaken such as profess a devotedness to God, to the speedy and vigorous endeavour of repairing the ruins of his temple in their own breasts ; that they may thence hold forth a visible representation of an indwelling Deity, in effects and actions of life worthy of such a presence, and render his enshrined glory transparent to the view and conviction of the irreligious and profane. Which hath more of hope in it, and is likely to be to better purpose, than disputing with them that more know how to jest, than reason ; and better imderstand the relishes of meat and drink, than the strength of an argument. VI. But though it would be both an ungrateful and in- significant labour, and as talking to the wind, to discourse of religion with persons that have abjured all seriousness, and that cannot endure to think ; and would be like fight- ing with a storm, to contend against the blasphemy and outrage of insolent mockers at whatever is sacred and di- vine ; and were too much a debasing of religion, to retort sarca.sms with men not capable of being talked with in any other than such (that is, their own) language : yet it wants neither its use nor pleasure, to the most composed minds, and that are most exempt from wavering herein, to view the frame of their religion, as it aptly and even naturally rises and grows up from its very foimdations; and to con- template its first principles, which they may in the mean time find no present cause or inclination to dispute. They will know how to consider its most fundamental grounds, not with doubt or suspicion, but with admiration and de- light ; and can with a calm and silent pleasure enjoy the repose and rest of a quiet and well-assured mind, rejoicing and contented to know to themselves, (when others refuse to partake with them in this joy,) and feel all firm and stable under them, whereupon either the practice or the hopes of their religion do depend. And there may be also many others of good and pious inclinations, that have never yet applied themselves to consider the principal and most fundamental grounds of religion, so as to be able to give or discern anj' tolerable reason of them. For either the sluggishness of their own temper may have indisposed them to any more painful and laborious exercise of their minds, and made them to be content with the easier course of taking every thing upon trust, and imitating the example of others; or they have been unhappily misinformed, that it consists not with the reverence due to religion, to search into the grounds of it. Yea, and may have laid this for one of its main grounds, that no exercise of rea.son may have any place about it. Or perhaps having never tried, they apprehend a greater difliculty in coming to a clear and certain resolution herein, than indeed there is. Now such need to be excited to set their own thoughts a-work this way, and to be assisted herein. They should therefore consider who gave them the understandings which they fear to use. And can they use them to better purpose, or with more gratitude to him who made them intelligent, and not brute creatures, than in labouring to know, that they may also by a reasonable service worship and adore their Maker 1 Are they not to use their very senses about the matters of religion 1 For the invisible things of God, even his eternal power and godhead, are clearly seen, &c. And their faith comes by hearing. But what 1 are these more sacred and divine, and more akin to religion, than their rea.son and jiidgment, without which also their sense can be of no use to them herein 1 Or is it the best way of making use of what God has revealed of himself, by whatsoever means, not to imderstand what he hath revealed "? It is most true in- deed, that when we once come clearly to be informed that God hath revealed this or that thing, we are then readily to subject (and not oppose) our feeble reasonings to his plain revelation. And it were a most insolent and un- creaturely arrogance, to contend or not yield him the cause, though things have to us seemed otherwise. But it were as inexcusable negligence, not to make use of our under- standings to the best advantage ; that we may both know that such a revelation is divine, and what it signifies, after we know whence it is. And anj- one that considers, will soon see it were very imseasonable, at least, to -allege the written, divine revelation, as the ground of his religion, till he have gone lower, and fore-known some things (by and by to be insisted on) as preparator}' and fundamental to the knowledge of this. And because it is obvious to suppose how great an in- crease of strength and vigour pious minds may receive hence, how much it may animate them to the service of the temple and contribute to their more cheerful progress in a religious course ; it will therefore not be besides our present purpose, but very pursuant to it, to consi'iil be sufficient to guide us in our search after his existence, if we can s^ive such a descrip- tion, or assign such certain characters of his being, as will severally or together distinguish him from all things else. For then we shall be able to call him by his own name, and say, This is God ; whatever his being may con- tain more, or whatsoever other properties may belong to it, beyond what we can as yet compass in our present thoughts of him. VIII. And such an account we shall have of what we are inquiring after, if we have the conception in our minds of an eternal, uncaused, independent, necessary Being, that hath active power, life, wisdom, goodness, and whatsoever other supposable excellency, in the highest perfection originally, in and of itself Such a being we would with common consent express by the name of God. Even they that would profess to deny or doubt of his existence, yet must acknowledge this to be the notion of that which they deny or doubt of Or if they should say this is not it, or (which is all one) that they do not deny or doubt of the existence of such a Being as this; they on the other hand that would ai-gue for his existence, may conclude the cause is yielded them; this being that which they designed to contend for. It must indeed be acknowledged, that some things 'be- longing to the notion of God might have been more ex- pressly named. But it was not necessary they should, being sufficiently included here, as will afterwards appear: nor perhaps so convenient ; some things, the express men- tion whereof is omitted, being such as more ca'ptious per- sons might be apt at first to startle at; who yet may possibly, as they are insinuated under other expressions, become by degrees more inclinable to receive them after- wards. And "however if this be not a full and adequate notion, (as who can ever tell when we have an express, dis- tinct, particular notion of G^d, which we are sure is ade- quate and fuin) it mav however suflice, that it is a trne 07ie, as far as it goes, and "such as cannot be mistaken for the notion of anv thing else. And it will be more especially suf- ficient to our present purpose, if enough be comprehended in it to recommend him to us as a fit and worthy object of religion; and whereto a temple ought to be designed: as 12 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. it •will appear there is, when also we shall have added what is intended, concerning his conversableness with men ; the ground whereof is also in great part included in this account of him; so that the consideration of it can- not be wholly severed from that of his existence ; as hath been intimated above. That is, that if such a Being ex- ist, unto which this notion belongs, it will sufficiently ap- pear, he is such as that he can converse with men, though it doth not thence certainly follow that he icill. For it were a rash and bold adventure, to say he could not be God, if he did not condescend to such terms of reconci- liation and converse with apostate creatures. Whereof, therefore, more is to be said, than the mere manifesting his existence, in its own place. And as to this, we shall endeavour to proceed gradual- ly, and in the most familiar and intelligible way we can. I am not unapprehensive that I might here indeed, fol- lowing great examples, have proceeded in another method than that which I now choose. And because we can have no true, appropriate, or distinguishing idea or conception of Deity, which doth not include nece.ssity of existence in it, have gone that shorter way, immediately to have con- cluded the existence of God, from his idea itself. And I see not, but treading those wary steps which the incompa- rable Dr. Cudworth (in his Intell. System) hath done, that argument admits, in spite of cavil, of being managed, with demonstrative evidence. Yet since some most per- tinaciously insist that it is at the bottom but a mere so- phism; therefore (without detracting any thing from the force of it as it stands in that excellent work, and the writings of some other noted authors) I have chosen to go this other way, as plainer and less liable to exception, though further about. And beginning lower, to evince from the certain present existence of things not existing necessarily, or of themselves, their manifest dependence on what doth exist necessarily or of itself; and how ma- nifestly impossible it was that any thing should .exist now, or hereafter to all eternity, if somewhat had not existed necessarily and of itself, from all eternity. And I trust, not only this will appear with competent evidence in the sequel of this discourse, but also that this necessary self- existent Being, is God, a Being absolutely perfect, such to whom the rest of his idea must belong ; and to whom religion or the honour of a temple is due. And because that was the point at which this discourse principally aims, and wherein it finally terminates, not merely the discovering of atheism, but irreligion ; from an apprehension that as to use and practice, it was all one to acknowledge no God at all, as only such a one to whonr no temple or religion could belong; it was therefore be- sides my purpose, to consider the several /wots or schemes of atheism, that have been devised in any age, as that excellent person hath done ; and enough for my purpose, to refute the Epicurean atheism, or theism, (it is indif- ferent which you call it,) because that sect-master, while he was liberal in granting there were deities, yet was so impious as to deny wor.ship to any, accounting they were such, as between whom and man there could be no con- versation ; on their fart by providence, or on manh by re- ligian. Therefore, if we shall have made it evident in the issue, that God is, and is conversable with men, both the Epicit^rean atheism vanishes from ofi^ the stage, and with it all atheism besides, and irreligion. IX. We therefore begin with God's existence. For the evincing whereof we may, 1. Be most assured, that there hath been somewhat or other from all eternity, or that looking backward, somewhat of real being must be confessed eternal. Let such as have not been used to think of any thing more than what they could see with their eyes, and to whom reasoning only seems difficult, because they have not tried what they can do in it, but use their thoughts a little, and by moving them a' few easy steps, they will soon find themselves as sure of this, as that they see, or hear, or understand, or are any thing. For being sure that something now is, (that you see, for instance, or are something,) you must then acknowledge, that certainly either something always was, and hath ever been, or been from all eternity; or else you must sav, that sometime, nothing was; or that all being once was not. And so, since you find that something now is, that there was a time when any thing of being did legin to be, that is, that till that time, there was nothing; bulnow, at that time, somewhat first began to be. For what can be plainer than that, if all being sometime was not, and nov-: some being is, every thing of being had a beginning'? And thence it would follow that some being, that is, the first that ever began to be, did of it.self start up out of nothing, or made itself to be, when before nothing was. But now, do you not plainly see that it is altogether impossible any thing should do so; that is, when it was as yet nothing, and when nothing at all as yet was, that it should make itself, or come into being of itself? For surely making itself is doing something. But can that which is nothing do any thing 1 Unto all doing there must be some doer. Wherefore a thing mu.st be, before it can do any thing ; and therefore it would follow ihat it was before it was ; or u-as and was not, was something and nothing, at the same time. Yea, and it was diverse from itself. For a cause must be a distinct thing from that which is caused by it. Wherefore it is most appa- rent that some being hath ever been, or did never legin to be. Whence further, X. It is also evident, 2. that some being was un- caused, or was ever of itself without any cause. For what never was from another had never any cause, since nothing could be its own cause. And somewhat, as appears from what hath been said, never was from an- other. Or it may be plainly argued thus ; that either some being was uncaused, or all being was caused. But if all being were caused, then some one, at least, was the cause of itself: which hath been already shown im- possible. Therefore the expression commonly used con- cerning the first Being:, that it was of itself, is only to be taken negatively, that is, that it was not of another, not positively, as if it did sometime make itself. Or, what there is positive, signified by that form of speech, is only to be taken thus, that it was a being of that nature, as that it was impossible it .should ever not have been. Not that it did ever of itself step out of not being into being: of which more hereafter. XI. And now it is hence further evident, 3. that some being is independent upon any other, that is, whereas it already appears that some being did never depend on any other, as a productive cause ; or was not beholden to any other, that it might come into being. It is thereupon equally evident that it is simply independent, or cannot be beholden to any for its continued being. For what did never need a productive cause, doth as little need a sus- taining or conserving cause. And to make this more plain, either .some being is independent, or all being is dependent. But there is nothing without the compass of all being, whereon it may depend. Wherefore to say, that all being doth depend, is to say it depends on nothing, that is, that it depends not. For to depend on nothing, is not to depend. It is therefore a manifest contradiction, to say that all being doth depend : against which it is no relief to say, that all beings do circularly depend on one another. For so, however, the whole circle or sphere ol beins: should depend on nothing, or one at last depend on itself; which negatively taken, as before, is true, and the thing we contend for ; that one, the common support ol all the rest, depends not on any thing without itself. Whence also it is plainly consequent, XII. That, 4. such a being is necessary, or doth necessarily exist ; that is, that it is of such a nature as that it could not or cannot but be. For what is in being neither by its own choice, or any other's, is necessarily. But what was not made by itself (which hath been shown impossible that any thing should) nor by any other, (as it hath been proved .something was not,) it is manifest, it neither depended on its own choice, nor any other's, that it is. And therefore its existence is not owing to choice at all, but to the ne cessity of its own nature. Wherefore it is always by a simple, absolute, natural necessity ; being of such a nature, to which it is altogether repugnant, and impossible ever not to have been, or ever to cease from being. And noAV ha- ving gone thus far, and being assured that hitherto we feel the ground firm under us; that is, having gained a full certainly that there is an eternal, uncaused, independent. Chap. II. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 13 necessary Being, and therefore actually and everlasting existing; we may advance one step lurlher, and with equal assurance add, XIII. 5. That this eternal, independent, uncaused, necessary Being, is self-active, that is, (which is at pre- sent meant,) not such as acts upon it.self, but that hath the power of acting upon other things, in and of itself, without deriving it from any other. Or at least that there is such a Being as is eternal, uncaused, &c. having the power of action in and of itself. For either such a Be- ing as hath been already evinced is of itself active, or unactive, or either hath the power of action of itself, or not. If we will say the latter, let it be considered what we say, and to what purpose we say it. First, we are to weigh what it is we affirm, when we speak of an eternal, uncaused, independent, necessarj'' Be- ing, that is of itself totally unactive, or destitute of any active power. If we will say there is some such thing, we will confess, when we have called it something, it is a very silly, despicable, idle something, and a something(if we look upon it alone) as good as nothing. For there is but little odds between being nothing, and being able to do nothing. We will again confess, eternit)'^, self-origination, independency, necessity of existence, to be very great and highly dignifying attributes; and that import a most in- conceivable excellency. For what higher glor)^ can we ascribe to any being, than to acknowledge it to have been from eternity of itself/ without being beholden to any other, and to be such as that it can be, and cannot but be in the same state, self-subsisting, and self-sufficient to all eternity 1 And what inconceivable myriads of little sense- less deities must we upon that supposition admit ! (as would appear if it were fit to trouble the reader with an explication of the nature and true notion of matter, which the being now supposed, must be found to be !) but what can our reason either direct or endure, that we should so incongruously misplace so magnificent attributes as these, and ascribe the prime glory of the most excellent Being, imto that which is next to nothing 1 What might further be said to demonstrate the impossibility of a self-subsist- ing and self-original, unactive Being, will be here unsea- sonable and pre-occupying. But if any in the mean time will be so sullen as to say such a thing. Let it, secondly, be considered to what purpose they say it. Is it to exclude a necessary self-active being 1 But it can signify nothing to that purpose. For such a being they will be forced to acknowledge, let them do what they can (be- sides putting out their own eyes) notwithstanding. For why will they acknowledge any necessary being at all, that was ever of itself? Is it not because they camnot, otherwise, for their hearts tell how it was ever possible that any thing at all could come into being 1 But finding that something is, they are compelled to acknowledge that something hath ever been, necessarily and of itself. No other account r We will acknowledge an impropriety in this word, anil its conjusate, gelf-OTiginate, sometimes hereat>er used : which yet is recompensed by their conveniency ; as they may perhaps find who shall make trial how to ex- press the sense intended by them in other words. And they are used with- out suspicion, that it can he thought they are meant to signify as if ever God gave original to himself; but in the negative sense, tliat he never received it from any other ; yea. and that lie is, what is mire than equivalent to his being, self caused ; namely, a Being of^ himself so excellent as not to need or be capable to admit any cause Vid. c. 4. Sect. 3. And with the ex- pectation of the same allowance which hath licen given to ai'ruirioc, or other like words. We also take it for eraiited, (v\hich ft may suffice to hint here once for all,) that when we use here the word self-sxibsistent, it will be under- stood we intend by it, (without logical or metapfiysical nicety,) not the mere exclusion of dependence on a subject, but on a cause. s And whether by the way this will not aflbrd us (though that be none of our present business) plain evidence that there can be no such thing as necessary, alterable matter, may be examined by such as think lit to give themselves the diversion. For let it be cnnsidered, if every part and par- ticle that makes up the matti'r of this universe were itself a necessary being, and of itself from all eternity, it must have not only it.s simple being, but its being such or such, of itself necessarily ; or rather every thing of it, or any way belonging to it, must be its very simple being itsclT. For wlience should it receive any accession to itself, when it is sup- posed equally independent upon its fellows, ils any of them upon it ? Sup- pose then only their various intercurrent mDlion among themselves, requi- site to prepare them to, and unite them in, the composition of particular bo5ure. Whatso{'\er difticulty we may apprehend in this case or if we cannot so easily conceive how an eternal mind foreseeing perfectly all futurity, together with an elem.il efficacious determination of will concerning the existmcc of such and Mich tliines to such an instant or point of time, can suffice to their production without a super addid efflux nfpertv of acting. Yea. ajid not only doth the former consist with tliis latter, but is inferred by it. Of w liich see GMenf de Ijben. Dei, 4- creat. .4 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part L But if it be said, though eternity be not the measure of one change, it may be of infinite changes, endlessly suc- ceeding one another; even this also will be found contra- dictious and impossible. For, (not to trouble the reader with the more intricate controversy of the possibility or impossibility of infinite or eternal succession, about which they who have a mind may consult others, t) if this signify any thing to the present purpose, it must mean the infinite or eternal chaiiges of a necessary being. And how these very terms do clash with one another, methinks any sound mind might apprehend at the first mention of them ; and how manifestly repugnant the things are, may be collected from what hath been said ; and especially from what was thought more fit to be annexed in the margin. But now since we find that the present state of things is changeable, and actually changing, and that what is change- able is not necessarily, and of itself; and since it is evident that there is some necessary being; (otherwise nothing could ever have been, and that without action nothing could be from it ;) since also all change imports somewhat of passion, and all passion supposes action, and all action active power, and activ^e power an original seat or subject, that is self-active, or that hath the power of action ill and of itself ; (for there could be no derivation of it from that which hath it not, and no first derivation, but from that which hath it originally of itself; and a first derivation there must be, since all things that are, or ever have been, furnished with it, and not of themselves, must either me- diately or immediately have derived it from that which had it of itself ;) it is therefore manifest that there is a neces- sary, self-active Being, the Cause and Author of this per- petually variable state and frame of things. And hence, XV. 6. Since we can frame no notion of life which self-active power doth not, at least, comprehend, (as upon trial we shall fmd that we cannot,) it is consequent, that this Being is also originally vital, and the root of all vi- tality, such as hath life in or of itself, and from whence it is propagated to every other living thing." And so as we plainly see that this sensible world did sometime begin to be, it is also evident that it took its be- ginning from a Being essentially vital and active, that had itself no beginning. Nor can we make a difficulty to conclude, that this Being (which now we have shown is active, and all action implies some power) is, XVI. 7. Of vast and mighty power, (we wall not say infinite, lest we should step too far at once ; not mind- ing now to discuss whether creation require infinite power,) when we consider and contemplate the vastness of the work performed by it. Unto which (if we were to make our estimate by nothing else) we must, at lea.st, judge this power to be proportionable. For when our eyes behold an effect exceeding the power of any cause which they can behold, our mind must step in and supply the defect of our feebler sense ; so as to make a judgment that there is a cause we see not, equal to this effect. As when we behold a great and magnificent fabric, and en- tering in we see not the master, or any living thing, (which was Cicero's observation'*' in reference to this present purpose,) besides mice and weasels, we will not think that mice or weasels built it. Nor need we in a matter so obvious, insist further. But only when our se- verer reason hath made us confess, our further contem- Elation should make us admire, a power which is at once oth so apparent and so stupendous. Corollary. And now, from what hath been hitherto discoursed, it seems a plain and necessary consecta- ry, that this world had a cause div^erse from the mat- ter whereof it is composed. For otherwise matter that hath been more generally t Parker Tentara. Physico=Thool. Dcrodoii. Philoa. cont. Dr. More's En- cWrid. Metaptiys. . u Wliich will also prove it to be a Spirit ; unto which order of beings es- sential vitality, or that life be essential to tliem, seems as di.stin^iisliiii^ a pro- jjorty between it and a body, as any other wi; can fasten iiimn ; that is. tliat thoiijch a body may be truly s.iid to live, yet it lives by a lifi- tlj.it i- :i, ilil'iil.il, uiid separable from it, so as that it may ce.-xse to live, and yfl 1" n linlv ~'ill ; wlicrons a spirit lives by its own essence ; so tliat it can no niun .•.<.-•• u, Ir . lliuii to bo. And as where that eiicncc ii bjrrowod and denv.'d i.,]ly, as it is taken to be of itself altogether unactive, must be stated the only cause and fountain of all the action and motion that is now to be foimd in the whole universe : which is a conceit, wild and absurd enough ; not only as it opposes the common judgment of such as have with the greatest diligence inquired into things of this nature, but as being in itself manifestly impossible to be true ; as would easily appear, if it were needful to press further Dr. More's* reasonings to this purpose ; which he hath done sufficient- ly for himself. And also that otherwise all the great and undeniable changes which continually happen in it must proceed from its own constant and eternal action upon itself, while it is yet feigned to be a necessary being; with the notion whereof they are notoriously inconsistent. Which there* fore we taking to be most clear, may now the more se- curely proceed to what follow. CHAPTER in. Wisdom asserted to belon? to tliis Being. The production of this world by a mighty agent destitute of wisdom impossible. On consideration of, 1. What would be adverse to this production. 2. What would be wanting -, some effects to which a designing cause will, on all hands, be confessed necessary, haling manifest characters of skill and design upon them. Absurd here to accept the works of nature ; wherein at least equal characters of wisdom and design are to be seen, as in any the most confessetl pieces of art, in- stanced in the frame and motion of heavenly bodies. A mean, unptiilo- sophical temper, to be more taken with novelties, than common tilings of greater importance. Further instance, in the composition of the bodies of animals. Two contrary causes of men's not acknowledging the wisdom of their Maker herein. Progress is made from the consideration of the parts and frame, to the powers and functions, of terrestrial creatures. Grouth, nutrition, propagation of kind. Spontaneous motion, sensation. The pre- tence considered, that the bodies of animals are machines, 1. How impro- bable it is. 2, How little to the purpose. The powers of the human soul. It appears, notwlthstanAing them, it had a cause ; by them, a wi.ie and in- telligent cause. It is not matter. That not capable of reason. They not here reflected on who think reasonable souls made of refined matter, by the Creator. Not being matter, nor arising from thence, it must have a cause that is intelligent. Goodness belonging to this Being. T. We therefore add, that this Being is wise and in- telligent, as well as powerful ; upon the very view of this world, it will appear so vast power was guided by equal wisdom in the framing of it. Though this is wont to be the principal labour in evincing the existence of a Deity, namely, the proving that this universe owes its rise to a wise and designing cause; (as may be seen in Cicero's excellent performance in this kind, and in divers later writers ;) yet the placing so much of their endeavour herein, seems in great part to have proceeded hence, that this hath been chosen for the great medium to prove that it had a cause diverse from itself. But if that once be done a shorter way, and it fully appear tliat this world is not itself a necessary being, having the power of all the action and motion to be found in it, of itself; (which already seems plain enough;) and it do most evidently thence also appear to have had a cause foreign to, or distinct from, itself; though we shall not there- fore the more carelessly consider this subject ; yet no place of doubt seems to remain, but that this was an intelligent cause, and that this world was the product of wisdom and counsel, and not of mere power alone. For what imagi- nation can be more grossly absurd, than to suppose this orderly frame of things to have been the result of so mighty power, not accompanied or guided by wisdom and counsel 1 that is, (as the ca.se must now unavoidably be understood,) that there is some being necessarily existent, of an essentially active nature, of inconceivably vast and mighty power and vigour, destitute of all under- standing and knowledge, and consequently of any self- moderating principle, but acting always by the necessity of its own nature, and therefore to its very uttermost, that raised up all the alterable matter of the universe (to whose nature it is plainly repugnant to be of itself, or exist with all created spirits, so its life must neeils be therewithal : so tlie eternal, self-subsisling Spirit, lives necessarily, and of itself, according as necessarily and of itself it is, or hath its being, W^hich is only annoted, with a design not to trouble this discourse with any r.:-. \v Tlr Niitiira nconim, X bciili in lii,s Immortality of the Soul; and Enchirid. Metaphys. ClIAP. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 15 necessarily) out of nothing:-, and by the utmost exertion of that ungoverned power, put all the parts and particles of that matter into a wild hurry of impetuous motion, by which they have been compacted and digested into parti- cular beings, in that variety and order which we now be- hold. And surely to give this account of the world's original, is, as Cicero speaks, not to consider, but to cast lots what to say; and were as mad a supposition, "as if one should suppose the one-and-twenty letters, formed (as the same author elsewhere speaks) in great numbers, of gold, or what you please else, and cast of any careless fashion together, and that of these loosely shaken out upon the ground, Eimius's Annals should result, so as to be dis- tinctly legible as now we see them." Nay, it were the supposition of a thing a thousand-fold more manifestly impossible. II. For before we consider the gross absurdity of such a supposed production, that is, that a thing should be brought to pass by so mere a casualty, that so evidently requires an exquisitely-formed and continued design, even though there were nothing positively to resist or hinder it, let it be con- sidered what there will be that cannot but most certainly hinder any such production. To this purpose we are to consider, that it is a vast power which so generally moves the diffused matter of the universe. Hereof make an estimate, by considering what is requi- site to the continual w^hirling about of such huge bulks as this whole massy globe of earth ; (according to .some ;) or, which is much more strange, the sun, (according to others,) with that inconceivably swift motion which this supposi- tion makes necessary, together with the other planets, and the innumerable heavenly bodies besides, that are subject to the laws of a continual motion. Adding hereto how mighty a power it is which must be sufficient to all the productions, motions, and actions, of all other things. Again, consider that all this motion, and motive power, must have some source and fountain diverse from the dull and sluggish matter moved thereby, unto which it already hath appeared impossible it should originally and essen- tially belong. Next, that the mighty, active Being, which hath been proved necessarily existent, and whereto it must first be- long, if we suppose it destitute of the self-moderating prin- ciple of wisdom and counsel, cannot but be always exert- ing its motive power, invarialily and to the same degree : that is, to its very utmost, and can never cease or fail to do so. For its act knows no limit but that of its power ; (if this can have any ;) and its power is essential to it, and its essence is necessary. Further, that the motion impressed upon the matter of the universe must hereupon necessarily have received a continual increase, ever since it came into being. That supposing this motive power to have been exerted from eternity, it must have been increased long ago to an infinite excess. That hence the coalition of the particles of matter for the forming of any thing had been altogether impossible. For let us suppose this exerted, motive power to have been, any instant, but barely sufficient for such a formation, be- cause that could not be despatched in an instant, it would by its continual, momently increase, be grown so over-suf- ficient, as, in the next instant, to dissipate the particles, but now beginning to unite. At least, it would be most apparent, that if ever such a frame of things as we now behold could have been produ- ced, that motive power, increased to so infinite an excess, must have shattered the whole frame in pieces, many an age ago; or rather, never have permitted that such a thing, as we call an age, could possibly have been. Our experience gives us not to observe any so destructive or remarkable changes in the course of nature : and this (as was long ago foretold) is the great argument of the atheistical scoffers in these latter days, that things are as they were from the beginning of the creation to this day. But let it be soberly weighed, how it is possible the gene- ral consistency, which we observe things are at through- out the universe, and their steady, orderly posture, can .stand with this momently increase of motion. a D. Cartes Princip. Philosopli. part 2. And that such.an increase could not, upon the supposi- tion we are now opposing, but have been, is most evident. For, not to insist that nothing of impressed motion is ever lost, but only imparted to other tilings, (which they that suppose it, do not Uierejore suppose, as if they thought, being once impressed, it could continue of itself, but that there is a constant, equal supply from the first mover,) we will admit that there is a continual decrease, or loss, but never to the degree of its continual increase. For we see when w^e throw a stone out of our hand, whatever of the impressed force it do impart to the air, through which it makes its way, or nut being received, vanishes of itself, it yet retains a part a considerable time, that carries it all the length of its journey, and all does not vanish and die away on the sudden. Therefore, when we here consider the continual, momently renewal of the same force, always necessarily going forth from the same mighty Agent, with- out any moderation or restraint; every following impetus doth so immediately overtake the former, that whatever we can suppose lost, is yet so abundantly over-supplied, that, upon the whole, it cannot fail to be ever growing, and to have grown to that all-destroying excess before mentioned. Whence, therefore, that famed restorer and improver of some principles of the ancient philosophy, hath seen a necessity to acknowledge it, as a manifest thing, " That God himself is the universal and primary cause of all the motions that are in the world, who in the beginning created matter, together with motion and rest ; and doth now, by his ordinar}' concourse onl}-. continue so much of motion and rest in it, as he first put iiuo it. — For (saith he) we understand it as a perfection in God, not only that he is unchangeable in him.self, but that he works after a most constant and unchangeable manner. So that, excepting those changes which either evident experience or divine revelation renders certain, and which we know or believe to be without change in the Creator, we ought to suppose none in his works, lest thereb\' any incon.stancy should be argued in himself."'^ Whereupon he grounds the laws and rules concerning motion, which he afterwards lays down, whereof we referred to one, a little above. It is therefore evident, that as without the supposition of a self-active Being there could be no such thing as motion ; so without the supposition of an intelligent Being, (that is, that the same Being be both self-active and intclUgetd,) there could be no regular motion ; such as is absolutely necessary to the forming and continuing of any the com- pacted, bodily substances, which our eyes behold every day : yea, or of any whatsoever, suppose we their figures, or shapes, to be as rude, deformed, and useless, as we c£m imagine; much less, such as the exquisite compositions, and the exact order of things, in the universe, do evidently require and discover. III. And if there were no such thing carried in this sup- position, as is positively adverse to what is supposed, so as most certainly to hinder it, (as we see plainly there is,) yet the mere want of what is necessary to such a produc- tion, is enough to render it impossible, and the supposition of it absurd. For it is not only absurd to suppose a pro- duction ^vhich somewhat shall certainly resist and hinder, but which wants a cause to effect it ; and it is not less absurd, to suppose it affected by a manifestly insufficient and unproportionable cause, than b\' none at ail. For as nothing can be produced without a cause, so no cause can work above or beyond its own capacity and natural apti- tude. Whatsoever therefore is ascribed to anj' cause, above and beyond its ability, all that surplusage is ascribed to no cause at all : and so an effect, in that part at least, were supposed without a cause. And if then it follow when an effect is produced, that it had a cause ; Mhy doth it not ecjually follow, when an effect is produced, having mani- fest characters of wisdom and design upon it, that it had a wise and designing cause 1 If it be said, there be scune fortuitous cir casual (at least undesigned) productions, that look like the effects of wisdom and contrivance, but indeed are not, as the birds so orderly and seasonalily making their nests, the bees their comb, and the spider its web, which are capable of no design : that exception needs to be wpH proved before it be admitted : and that it be plainly demonstrated, both that these creatures are not capable of design, and that there is not a universal, designing cause, 16 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. from whose directive as well as operative influence, no imaginable efl'ect or event can be exempted; (in which case it will no more be necessary, that every creature that is observed steailily to work towards an end, should itself design and know it, than that an artificer's tools should know what he is doing with them: but if they do not, it is plain he must;) and surely it lies upon them who so ex- cept, to prove in this case what they say, and not be so precarious as to beg or think us so easy, as to grant so much, only because they have thought fit to say it, or would fain have it so. That is, that this or that strange event happened without any designing cause. IV. But, however, I would demand of such as rnake this exception, whether they think there be any effect at all, to which a designing cause was necessary, or which they will judge impossible to have been otherwise pro- duced, than by the direction and contrivance of wisdom and counsell I little doubt but there are thousands of things, laboured and wrought by the hand of man, con- cerning which they would presently, upon first sight, pro- nounce they were the etfects of skill, and not of chance; yea, if they only considered their frame and shape, though they )'et understood not their use and end. They would surely think (at least) some effects or other sufhcient to argue to us a designing cause. And would they but so- berly consider and resolve what characters or footsteps of wisdom and design might be reckoned suflicient to put us out of doubt, would they not, upon comparing, be brought to acknowledge there are no whei:eany more conspicuous and manifest, than in the things daily in view, that go or- dinarily, with us, under the name of tke works of nature 7 Whence it is plainly consequent, that what men com- monly call universal nature, if they would be content no longer to lurk in the darkness of an obscure and uninter- preted word, they must confess is nothing else but com- mon providence, that is, the universal poiver which is every where active in the world, in conjunction with the mier- ring ivisdom which guides and moderates all its exertions and operations; or the wisdom which directs and governs that power. Otherwise, when they see cause to acknow- ledge that such an exact order and disposition of parts, in very neat and elegant compositions, doth plainly argue wisdom and skill in the contrivance; only they will dis- tinguish, and say, It is so in the effects of art, but not of natur",. What is this, but to deny in particular what they granted in general 1 to make what they have said signify nothing more than if they had said. Such exqui- site order of parts is the efiect of wisdom, where it is the effect of wisdom, but it is not the effect of wisdom, where it is not the effect of wisdom 1 and to trifle, instead of giving a reason why things are so and so 1 And whence take they their advantage for this trifling, or do hope to hide their folly in it, but that they think, while what is meant by art is known, what is meant by nature cannot be known 1 But if it be not known, how can they tell but their distinguishing members are co-incident, and run into one 1 Yea, and if they would allow the thing itself to speak, and the effect to confess and dictate the name of its own cause, how plain is it that they do run into one, and that the expression imports no impropriety which we somewhere find in Cicero ; The art of nature ; or rather, that nature is nothing else but divine art, at least in as near an analogy as there can be, between any things di- vine and human. For, that this matter (even the thing itself, waving for the present the consideration of names) may be a little more narrowly discussed and searched into, let some curious piece of worlcmanship be offered to such a sceptic's view, the making whereof he did not see, nor of any thing like it ; and we will suppose him not told that this was made by the hand of any man, nor that he hath any thing to guide his judgment about the way of its becoming what it is, but only his own view of the thing itself; and yet he shall presently, without hesitation, pro- nounce. This was the eflfect of much skill. I would here inquire, Why do you so pronounce 7 Or, What is the rea- son of this your judgment 1 Surely he would not say he hath no reason at all for this so confident and unwavering determination ; for then he would not be determined, but speak by chance, and be indifferent to say that, or any thing else. Somewhat or other there must be, that, when he is asked. Is this the effect of skilll shall so suddenly and irresistibly captivate him into an assent that it is, that he cannot think otherwise. Nay, if a thousand men weie asked the same question, they would as undoubtedly say the same thing ; and then, since there is a reason for this judgment, what can be devised to be the reason, but that there are so manifest characters and evidences of skill in the composure, as are not attributable to any thing CISC'! Now here I would further demand, Is there any thing in this reason, yea, or no? Doth it signify any thing, or is it of any value to the purpose for which it is alleged 1 Surely it is of very great, inasmuch as, when it is con- sidered, it leaves it not in a man's power to think any thing else ; and what can be said more potently and efh- caciously to demonstrate 1 But now, if this reason signify any thing, it signifies thus much ; that wheresoever there are equal characters, and evidences of skill, (at least where there are equal,) a skilful agent must be acknow- ledged. And so it will (in spite of cavil) conclude uni- versally, and abstractedly from what we can suppose dis- tinctly signified by the terms oi art, and nature, that what- soever effect hath such or equal characters of skill upon it, did proceed from a skilful cause. That is, that if this effect be said to be from a skilful cause, as such, {viz. as having manifest characters of skill upon it,) then, every such effect, {viz. that hath equally manifest characters of skill upon it,) must be, with equal reason, concluded to be from a skilful cause. We will acknowledge skill to act, and wit to contrive, very distinguishable things, and in reference to some works, (as the making some curious automato7i, or self-moving engine,) are commonly lodged in divers subjects; that is, the contrivance exercises the wit and invention of one, and the making, the manual dexterity and skill of others: but the manifest characters of both will be seen in the ef- fect. That is, the curious elaborateness of each several part shows the latter ; and the order and dependence of parts, and their conspiracy to one common end, the former. Each betokens design ; or at least the smith or carpenter must be understood to design his own part, that is, to do as he was directed: both together, do plainly bespeak an agent, that knew what he did ; and that the thing was not done by chance, or was not the casual product of only being busy at random, or making a careless stir, with- out aiming at any thing. And this, no man that is in his wits, would, upon sight of the whole frame, more doubt to assent unto, than that two and two make four. And he would certainly be thought mad, that should pro- fess to think that only by some one's making a blustering stir among several small fragments of brass, iron, and wood, these parts happened to be thus curiously formed, and came together into this frame, of their own accord. Or lest this should be thought to intimate too rude a representation of their conceit, Avho think this world to have fallen into this frame and order, wherein it is, by the agi- tation of the moving parts, or particles of matter, without the direction of a wi.se mover: and that we may also make the case as plain as is possible to the most ordinary capacity, we will suppose (for instance) that one who had never before seen a watch, or any thing of that sort, hath now this little engine first offered to his view; can we doubt, but he would upon the mere sight of its figure, structure, and the very curious workmanship which we will suppose appearing in it, presently acknowledge the artificer's hand"? But if he were also made to understand the use and purpose for which it serves, and it were dis- tinctly shown him how each thing contributes, and all things in this little fabric concur to this purpose, the exact measur- ing and dividing of time by minutes, hours, and months, he would certainlj'both confess and praise the great inge- nuity of the first inventor. But now if a b)'--stander, be- holding him in this admiration, would imderlake to show a profounder reach and strain of wit, and should say, Sir, you are mistaken concerning the composition of this so much admired piece ; it was not made or designed by the hand or skill of any one; there were only an innumerable company of little atoms or very small bodies, much too small to be perceived by your sense, that were busily frisk- ing and plying to and fro about I he place of its nativity; and by a strange chance (or a stranger fate, and the necessary Chap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. n laws of that motion which the}' were unavoidably put into, by a certain boisterous, undesigning mover) they fell together into this small bulk, so as to compose it into this very shape and figure, and with this same number and order of parts which you now behold : one squadron of these busy particles (little thinking what they were about) agreeing to make up one wheel, and another some other, in that proportion which you see : others of them also falling, and becoming fixed in so happy a posture and situation, as to describe the several figures by which the little moving fingers point out the hour of the day, and day of the month : and all conspired to fall together, each into its own place, in so lucky a juncture, as that the re- gular motion failed not to ensue which we see is now observed in it, — what man is either so wise or so foolish (for it is hard to determine whether the excess or defect should best qualify him to be of this faith) as to be capable of being made believe this piece of natural history? And if one should give this account of the production of such a trifle, would he not be thought in jest "? But if he persist, and solemnly profess that thus he takes it to have been, would he not bethought in good earnest mad 1 And let but any sober person judge whether we have not unspeak- ably more manifest madness to contend against in such as suppose this world, and the bodies of living creatures, to have fallen into this frame and orderly disposition of parts wherein they are, without the direction of a wise and de- signing cause 1 And whether there be not an incomparably greater number of most wild and arbitrary suppositions in their fiction than in this 7 Besides the innumerable sup- posed repetitions of the same strange chances all the world over ; even as numberless, not only as productions, but as the changes that continually happen to all the things pro- duced. And if the concourse of atoms could make this world, why not (for it is but little to mention such a thing as this) a porch, or a temple, or a house, or a city, (as Tally speaks in the before-recited place,) which were less operose and much more easy performances'? V. It is not to be supposed that all should be astrono- mers, anatomists, or natural philosophers, that shall read these lines; and therefore it is intended not to insist upon particulars, and to make as little use as is possible of terms that would only be agreeable to that supposition. But surely such general, easy reflections on the frame of the uni\'erse, and the order of parts in the bodies of all sorts of living creatures, as the meanest ordinary understanding is capable of, would soon discover incomparably greater evidence of wisdom and design in the contrivance of these, than in that of a watch or a clock. And if there were any whose understandings are but of that size and measure as to suppose that the whole frame of the heavens serves to no other purpose than to be of some such use as that, to us mortals here on earth ; if they would but allow themselves leisure to think and consider, might discern the most con- vincing and amazing discoveries of wise contrivance and design (as well as of vastest might and power) in disposing things into so apt a subserviency to that meaner end. And that so exact a knowledge is had thereby of times and seasons, days and years, as that the simplest idiot in a country may be able"to tell you, when the light of the sun is withdrawn from his eyes, at what time it Mnll return, and when it will look in at such a window, and Avhen at the other ; and by what degrees his days and nights shall either increase or be diminished ; and what proportion of time he shall have for his labours in this season of the year, and what in that ; without the least suspicion or fear that it shall ever fall out otherwise. But that some in later days whose more enlarged minds have by diligent search and artificial helps, got clearer notices (even than most of the more learned of former times) concerning the true frame and vastness of the uni- verse, the matter, nature, and condition of the heavenly bodies, their situation, order, and laws of motion; and the great probability of their serving to nobler purposes, than the greater part of learned men have ever dreamed of be- fore ; that, I say, any of these should have chosen it for the employment of their great intellects, to devise ways of ex- cluding intellectual power from the contrivance of this b Lib. ?. De usu part, ex Lacun. Epit. frame of things, having so great advantages beyond the most of mankind besides to contemplate and adore the great Author and Lord of all, is one of the greatest won- ders that comes under our notice; and might tempt even a sober mind to prefer vulgar and popular ignorance, be- fore their learned, philosophical deliration. VI. Though yet, indeed, not their philosophy by which they would be distinguished from the common sort, but what they have in common wiih them, ought in justice to bear theblame. For it isnot evident, how much soever they reckon themselves exalted above the vulgar sort, that their miserable shifting in this matter proceeds only from what is most meanly so ; i. e. their labouring under the most vulgar and meanest diseases of the mind, disregard of what is common, and an aptness to place more in the strangeness of new, unexpected, and surprising events, than in things unspeakably more consideiable, that are of every day's observation "? Than which nothing argues a more abject, nnphilosophical temper. For let us but suppose (what no man can pretend is more impossible, and what any man must confess is less considerable, than what our eyes daily see) that in some part of the air near this earth, and within such limits as that the whole scene might be conveniently beheld at one view, there should suddenly appear a little globe of pure flaming light resembling that of the sun ; and suppose it fixed as a centre to another body, or moving about that other as its centre, (as this or that h3'pothesis best pleases us,) which we could plainly perceive to be a proporlion- ably-little earth, beautified with little trees and woods, flowery fields, and flowing rivulets with larger lakes into which these discharge themselves ; and suppose we the other planets all of proportionable bigness to the narrow limits assigned them, placed at their due distances, and playing about this supposed earth or sun, so as to measure their shorter and soon absolved days, months, and years, or two, twelve, or thirty years, according to their supposed lesser circuits ; — would they not presently, and with great amazement, confess an intelligent contriver and maker of this whole frame, above a Posidonius or any mortal ] And have we not in the present frame of things a demonstration of wisdom and counsel, as far exceeding that which is now supposed, as the making some toy or bauble to please a child is less an argument of wisdom than the contrivance of somewhat that is of apparent and universal use 7 Or, if we could suppose this present state of things to have but newly begun, and ourselves pre-existent, so that we could take notice of the very pa.ssing of things out of horrid con- fusion into the comely order they are now in, would not this put the matter out of doubt 7 And that this state had once a beginning needs not be proved over again. But might what would yesterday have been the effect of wis- dom, better have been brought about by chance five or six thousand }'ears, or any longer time ago 1 It speaks not want of evidence in the thing, but want of consideration, and of exercising our understandings, if Avhat were new would not only convince but astonish, and what is old, of the same importance, doth not so much as convince 1 VII. And let them that understand any thing of the com- position of ahumanbody (or indeed of any livingcrcature) but bethink themselves whether there be not equal contri- vance at least, appearing in the composure of that admir- able fabric, as of any the most admired machine or engine devised and made by human wit and skill. If we pitch upon anv thing of known and common use, as suppose again a clock or watch, which is no sooner seen than ii is acknowledged (as halh been said) the eflect of a designing caitse ; will we not confess as much of the body of a man ? Yea, what comparison is there, when in the structure of some one single member, as a hand, a foot, an eye, or ear, there appears upon a diligent search, unspeakablv greater curiositv, whether we consider the variety of parts, their exquisite figuration, or their apt disposition to the distinct uses and ends these members serve for, than is to be seen in any clock or watch 1 Concerningwhich uses of the seve- ral parts in man's body, Galen, ^ so largely discoursing in seventeen books, inserts on the by, this epiphonema, upon the mention of one particular instance of our most wise 18 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. Maker's provident care; " Unto whom (saith he) I com- pose these commentaries," (meaning his present work of unfolding the useful figuration of the human body,) " as certain hymns, or songs of praise, esteeming true piety more to consist in this, that I first may know, and then declare to others, his wisdom, power, providence, and goodness, than in sacrificing to him many hecatombs: and in the ignorance whereof there is greatest impiety, rather than in abstaining from sacrifice.*^ Nor" (as he adds in the close of that excellent work) " is the most perfect natu- ral artifice to be seen in man only ; but you may find the like industrious design and wisdom of the Author, in any living creature which you shall please to dissect : and by how much the less it is, so much the greater admiration shall it raise in you; which those artists show, that describe some great thing (contractedly) in a very small space: as thai person (saith he) who lately engraved Phaeton carried in his chariot with his four horses upon a little ring — a most incredible sight '. But there is nothing in matters of this nature, more strange than in the structure of the leg of a flea." How much more might it be said of all its in- ward parts ! " Therefore (as he adds) the greatest com- modity of such a work accrues not to physicians, but to them who are studious of nature, viz. the knowledge of our Maker's perfection, and that (as he had said a little above) it establishes the principle of the most perfect theo- log}', which theology (sailh he)ismuchmoreexcellent than all medicine." It were too great an undertaking, and beyond the de- signed limits of this discourse, (though it would be to ex- cellent purpose, if it could be done without amusing terms, and in that easy, familiar way as to be capable of common use,) to pursue and trace distinctly the prints and footsteps of the admirable wisdom which appears in the structure and frame of this outer temple. For even our bodies them- selves are said to be the temples of the Holy Ghost, 1 Cor. vi. 19. And to dwell a while in the contemplation and discovery of those numerous instances of most apparent, ungainsayable sagacity and providence which offer them- selves to view in every part and particle of this fabric; how most commodiously all things are ordered in it ! With how strangely cautious circumspection and foresight, not only destructive, hut even (perpetually) vexatious and afflicting, incongruities are avoided and provided against, to pose ourselves upon the sundry obvious questions that might be put for the evincing of such provident foresight. As for instance, how comes it to pass that the several parts which we find to be double in our bodies, are not single only '? Is this altogether by chance 1 That there are two eyes, ears, nostrils, hands, feet, &c. what a miserable, shiftless creature had man been, if there had only been allowed him one foot 1 a seeing, hearing, talking, un- moving statue. That the hand is divided into fingers 1 those so conveniently situate, one in so fitly opposite a posture to the rest 1 And what if some one pair or other of these parts had been universally wanting 1 The hands, the feet, the eyes, the ears. How great a misery had it inferred upon man- kind ! and is it only a casualty that it is not so ■? That the back-bone is composed of so many joints, (twenty- four, besides those of that which is the basis and sustainer of the whole,) and is not all of a piece, by which stooping, or any motion of the head or neck, diverse from that of the whole body, had been altogether impossible; that there is such variety and curiosity in the ways of joining the bones to- gether in that, and other parts of the body ; that in some parts, they are joined by mere adherence of one to another,! cither with or without an intervening medium, and both these ways, so diversely; that others are fastened together by proper jointing, so as to suit and be accompanied with motion, either more obscure or more manifest, and this, cither by a deeper or more superficial insertion of onebone into another, or by a mutual insertion, and that so different ways ; and that all these should be exactly accommodated to the several parts and uses to which they belong and serve : — was all this without design 1 Who, that views r. Sub. fill. I 17. d Fiiirtliolin. Riolanu's. c flow foolish to think that art intendod an end in making a window to sne thruugli, and that nature iiileiidcd none in making an eye to see the curious and apt texture of the eye, can think it was not made on purpose to see with,' and the ear, upon the like view, for hearing, when so many things must concur that these actions might be performed by these organs, and are found to do so 1 Or who can think that the sundry little engines belonging to the eye were not made with design to move it upwards, do'viTiwards, to this side or that, or whirl it about as there should be occasion ; without which in- struments and their appendages, no such motion could have been 1 Who, that is not stupidly perverse, can think that the sundry inward parts (which it would require a volume distinctly to speak of, and but to mention them and their uses would too unproportionably swell this part of this discourse) were not made purposely by a designing Agent, for the ends they so aptly and constantly serve for"? The want of some one among divers whereof, or but a little misplacing, or if things had been but a little otherwise than they are, had inferred an impossibility that such a creature as man could have subsisted, or been propagated upon the face of the earth. As what if there had not been such a receptacle prepared as the stomach is, and so formed, and placed as it is, to receive and digest necessary nutriment If Had not the whole frame of man besides been in vain 1 Or what if the passage from it downward had not been somewhat a little way ascending, so as to detain a conve- nient time what is received, but that what was taken in were suddenly transmitted 1 It is evident the whole structure had been ruined as soon as made. What (to in- stance in what seems so small a matter) if that little cover had been wanting at the entrance of that passage through which we breathe; (the depression whereof by the weight of what we eat or drink, shuts it and prevents meat and drink from going down that way ;) had not tmavoidable suffocation ensued 1 And who can number the instances that might be given besides 1 Now when there is a concur- rence of so many things absolutely necessary, (concerning which the common saying is as applicable, more frequently wont to be applied to matters of morality, " Goodness is from the concurrence of all causes ; evil from any defect,") each so aptly and opportunely serving its own proper use, and all one common end, certainly to say that so manifold, so regular, and stated a subserviency to that end, and the end itself, were imdesigned, and things casually fell out thus, is to say we know or care not what. We will only, before we close this consideration, con- cerning the mere frame of a human body, (which hath been so hastily and superficially proposed,) offer a supposition which is no more strange (excluding the vulgar notion by which nothing is strange, but what is not common) than the thing itself, as it actually is ; viz. That the whole more external covering of the body of a man were made, instead of skin and flesh, of some very transparent sub- stance, flexible, but clear as very crystal; through which, and the other more inward (and as transparent) integu- ments or enfoldings, we could plainly perceive the situation and order of all the internal parts, and how they each of them perform their distinct offices : if we could discern the continual motion of the blood, how it is conveyed by its proper conduits, from its first source and fountain, partly downwards to the lower entrails, (if rather it ascend not from thence, as at least what afterwards becomes blood doth,) partly upwards, to its admirable elaboratory, the heart ; where it is refined and furnished with fresh vital spirits, and so transmitted thence by the distinct vessels prepared for this purpose: could we perceive the curiou.s contrivance of those little doors, by which it is let in and out, on this side and on that ; the order and course of its circulation, its most commodious distribution by two social channels, or conduit-pipes, that every where accompany one another throughout the body: could we discern the curious artifice of the brain, its ways of purgation ; and were it possible to pry into the secret chambers and recep- tacles of the less or more pure spirits there ; perceive theii manifold conveyances, and the rare texture of that net, commonly called the u-onderful one : could we behold the veins, arteries, and nerves, all of them arising from their with i as Canipanella in that rapturous discourse of liis Atheismiia triimipha- tu.s. . . f Non prodest cibus neqne corpori acccdit, qui statim sumptus emittitur. Seneca (on another occasion.) Ckap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 19 proper and distinct originals ! and their orderly dispersion for the most part, by pairs and conjugations, on this side and that, from the middle of the back; with the curiously wrought branches, which, supposing these to appear duly diversified, as so many more duskish strokes in this trans- parent frame, they would be found to make throughout the whole of it ; were every smaller fibre thus made at once dis- cernible; especially thi)se innumerable threads into which the spinal marrow is distributed at the bottom of the back : and could we, through the some medium, perceive those numerous little machines made to serve unto voluntary motions, (which in the whole body are computed, by some,? to tlie number of four hundred and thirty, or thereabouts, or so many of them as according to the present supposi- tion could possibly come in view,) and discern their com- position ; their various and elegant figures — round, square, long, triangular, &c. and behold them do their offices, and see'how they ply to and fro, and work in their respective places, as any motion is to be performed by them : were all these things, I say, thus made liable to an easy and distinct view, who would not admiringly cry out, How fearfully and wonderfully am Iviade? And sure there is no man sober, who would not, upon such a sight, pro- nounce that man mad, that should suppose such a produc- tion to have been a mere undesigned casualty. At least, if there be any thing in the world that may be thought to carry sufficiently convincing evidences in it, of its having been made industriously, and on purpose, not by chance, would not this composition, thus offered to view, be esteemed to do so much more"? Yea, and if it did only bear upon it characters equally evidential, of wisdom and design, with ivhat doth certainly so, though in the lowest degree, it were sufficient to evince our present purpose. For if one such instance as this would bring the matter no higher than to a bare equality, that would at least argue a maker of man's body, as wise, and as properly designing, as the artificer of any such slighter piece of workmanship, that may yet, certainly, be concluded the effect of skill and design. And then, "enough might be said, from other instances, to manifest him unspeakably superior. And that the matter would be brought, at least, to an equality ,_ upon the supposition now made, there can be no doubt, if any one be judge that hath not abjured his understanding and his eyes together. And what then, if we lay aside that supposition, (which only somewhat gratifies fancy and imagination,) doth that alter the case 1 Or is there the less of wisdom and contrivance expressed in this work of form- ing man's body, only for that it is not so easily and sud- denly obvious to our sight 1 Then we might with the same reason say, concerning some curious piece of carved work, that is thought fit to be kept locked up in a cabinet, when we see it, that there was admirable workmanship shown in doing it ; but as soon as it is again shut up in its repository, that there was none at all. Inasmuch as we speak of the objective characters of wisdom and design, that are in the thing itself, (though they must some way or other come under our notice, otherwise we can be capa- ble of arguing nothing from them, yet,) since we have suf- ficient assurance that there really are such characters in the structure of the body of man as have been mentioned, and a thousand more than have been thought necessary to be mentioned here ; it is plain that the greater or less facility of finding them out, so that we be at a certainty that they are, (whether by the slower and more gradual search of our own eyes, or by relying upon the testimony of such as have purchased themselves that satisfaction by their own labour and diligence,) is merely accidental to the thing itself we are discoursing of; and neither adds to, nor de- tracts from, the rational evidence of the present argument. Or if it do either, the more abstruse paths of divine wis- dom in this, as in other things, do rather recommend it the more to our adoration and reverence, than if every thing were obvious, and lay open to the fir.st glance of a more careless eye. The things which we are sure (or may be, if we do not shut our eyes) the wise Maker of this world hath done, do sufficiently serve to assure us that he could have done this also; that is, have made every thing in the frame and shape of our bodies conspicuous in the way but g Rlolanus. h Parker Tentani. Pliysico-Tlieol. now supposed, if he had thought it fit. He hath done greater things. And since he hath not thought that fit, we may be bold to say, the doing of it would signify more trifling, and less design. It gives us a more amiable and comely representation of the Being we are treating of, that his works are less for ostentation than use ; and that his wisdom and other attributes appear in them rather to the instruction of sober, than the gratification of vain minds. We may therefore confidently conclude, that the figura- tion of the human body carries with it as manifest, un- questionable evidences of design, as any piece of human artifice, that most confessedly, in the judgment of any man, doth so ; and therefore had as certainly a designing cause. We may challenge the world to show a disparity, unless it be that the advantage is unconceivably great on our side. For would not any one that hath not abandoned at once both his reasonii and his modesty, be ashamed to confess and admire the skill that is shown in making a statue, of the picture of a man, that (as one ingeniously says^ is but the shadow of his skin, and deny the wisdom that ap- pears in the composure of his body itself, that contains so numerous and so various engines and instruments for sundry purposes in it, as that it is become an art, and a very laudable one, but to discover and find out the art and skill that are shown in the contrivance and forma- tion of them "? VIII. It is in the mean time strange to consider from how diflferent and contrary causes it proceeds, that the wise Contriver of this fabric hath not his due acknowledgments on the account of it. For with some, it proceeds from their supine and drowsy ignorance, and that they little know or think what prints and footsteps of a Deity they carry about them, in (heir bone and flesh, in every part and vein and limb. With others, (as if too much learning had made them mad, or an excess of light had struck them into mopish blindness,) these things are so well known and seen, so common and obvious, that they are the less regarded. And because they can give a very punctual account that things are so, they think it, now, not worth the consider- ing^how they come to be so. They can trace all these hidden paths and footsteps, and therefore all seems very easy, and they give over wondering. As they that would detract from Columbus's acquists of glory by the discovery he had made of America, i by pretending the achievement was easy; whom he ingeniously rebuked, by challenging them to make an egg stand erect, alone, upon a pfain table; which when none of them could do, he only by a gentle bruising of one end of it makes it stand on the table with- out other support, and then tells them this was more easy than his voyage to America, now they had seen it done; before, thej^ knew not how to go about it. Some may think the contrivance of the bodv of a man, or other animal, easy, now they know it ; but had they been to project such a model without a pattern, or any thing leading thereto, how miserable a loss had they been at ! How easy a con- fession had been drawn frorii thein of the finger of God, and how silent a submission to his just triumph over their and all human wit, when the most admired performances in this kind, bv any mortal, have been only faint and in- finitely distant" imitations of the works of God ! As is to be seen in the so much celebrated exploits of Posidonius, Resfiomontanus, and others of this sort. IX. And now if any should be either so incurably blind as not to perceive, or so perversely wilful as not to acknow- ledge an appearance of wisdom in the frame and figuration of the bodv of an animal (peculiarly of man) more than equal to what appears in any the miost exquisite piece of human artifice, and which no wit of man can ever fully imitate; although, as hath been said, an acknowledged equality would suffice to evince a wise maker thereof, yet because it is the existence of God we are now speaking of, and that it is therefore not enough to evince, but to mag- nify, the wisdom we would ascribe to him; we shall pass from the parts and frame, to the consideration of the more principal powers and functions of terrestrial creatures; a.scending from .such as agree to the less perfect orders of these, to those of the more perfect, vi~. of man himselC i Arclibishop Abbot's Gis-g. 20 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part i. And surely to have been the Author of faculties that shall enable to such functions, will evidence a wisdom that defies our imitation, and will dismay the attempt of it. We begin with that of groicth. Many sorts of rare en- £^ines we acknowledge contrived by the wit of man, but who hath ever made one that could grow, or that had in it a self-improving power! A tree, an herb, a pile of grass, may upon this account challenge all the world to make such a thing. That is, to implant the power of growing into any thing to which it doth not natively belong, or to make a thing to which it doth. By what art would they make a seed 1 And which way would they inspire it with a seminal form 1 And they that think this whole globe of the earth was compacted by the casual (or fatal) coalition of particles of matter, by what magic would they conjure so many to come together as should make one clod 7 We vainly himt with a lingering mind after miracles ; if we did not more vainly mean by them nothing else but novelties, we are compassed about with such. And the greatest miracle is, that we see them not. You with whom the daily productions of nature (as you call it) are so cheap, see if you can do the like. Try your skill upon a rose. Yea, but you must have pre- existent matter 1 But can you ever prove the Maker of the world had so, or even defend the possibility of uncreated matter 1 And suppose they had the free grant of all the matter between the crown of their head and the moon, could they tell what to do with it, or how to manage it, so as to make it yield them one single flower, that they might glory in, as their own production! And what mortal man, that hath reason enough about him to be serious, and to think awhile, would not even be amazed at the miracle oinutritioii? Or that there are things in the world capable of nourishment! Or who would attempt an imitation here, or not despair to perform any thing like it! That is, to make any nourishable thing. Are we not here infinitely out-done ! Do not we see our- selves compassed about with wonders, and are we not ourselves such, in that we see, and are creatures, from all whose parts there is a continual defluxion, and yet that receive a constant gradual supply and renovation, by which they are continued in the same state ! As the bush burn- ing, but not consumed. It is easy to give an artificial frame to a thing that shall gradually decay and waste till it quite be gone, and disappear. You can raise a structure of snow, that would .soon do that. But can your manual skill compose a thing that, like our bodies, shall be con- tinually melting away, and be continually repaired, through so long a tract of time ! Nay, but you can tell how it is done ; you know in what method, and by what instruments, food is received, concocted, separated, and so much as must serve for nourishment, turned into chyle, and that into blood, first grosser, and then more refined, and that distributed into all parts for this purpose. Yea, and what then ! Therefore you are as wise as your Maker. Could you have made such a thing as the stomach, a liver, a heart, a vein, an artery ! Or are you so very sure what the digestive quality is ! Or if you are, and know what things best serve to maintain, to repair, or strengthen it ; who im- planted that quality! both where it is so immediately u.seful, or in the other things you would use for the service of that ! Or how, if such things had not been prepared to your hand, would you have devised to persuade the par- ticles of matter into so useful and happy a conjuncture, as that such a quality might result ! Or, (to speak more suit- ably to the most,) how, if you had not been shown the way, woukl you have thought it were to be done, or which way would you have gone to work, to turn meat and drink into flesh and blood ! Nor is propagation of their own kind, by the creatures that have that faculty implanted in them, less admirable, or more possible to be imitated by any human device. Such productions stay in their first descent. Who can, by his own contrivance, find out a way of making any thing that can produce another like itself.' What machine did ever man invent, that had this power ! And the ways and means by which it is done, are .such (though he that can do all things well knew how to compass his ends k Des Cartes de passioniUia aiiima;, part 1. atmie alibi. by them) as do exceed not our understanding only, but our wonder. And what shall we sa.y of spontomeoiis motion, wherewith we find also creatures endowed that are so mean and despicable in our eyes, (as well as ourselves,) that is, that so silly a thing as a fly, a gnat, &c. should have a power in it to move itself, or stop its owai motion, at its own pleasure! How far have all attempted imitations in this kind fallen short of this perfection ! And how much more excellent a thing is the smallest and mo.st contemptible insect, than the most admired machine we ever heard or read of; (as Archytas Tarentinus's dove, so anciently cele- brated ; or more lately, Regiomontanus's fly, .or his eagle, or any the like;) not only as having this peculiar power, above any thing of this sort, but as having the sundry other poicers, besides, meeting in it, whereof these are wholly destitute ! And should we go on to instance further in the several powers of sensation, both external and internal, the various instincts, appetitions, passions, sympathies, antipathies, the powers of memory, (and we might add, of speech,) that we find the inferior orders of creatures either generally fur- nished with, or some of them, as to this last, disposed unto. How should we even over-do the present business; and too needlessly insult over human wit, (which we must suppose to have already yielded the cause,) in challenging it to produce and offer to view^ a hearing, seeing engine, that can imagine, talk, is capable of hunger, thirst, of desi re, anger, fear, grief, &c. as its own creature, concerning which it may glory and say, I have done this! Is it so admirable a performance, and so ungainsayable an evidence of skill and wisdom, with much labour and long travail of mind, a busy, restless agitation of working thoughts, the often renewal of frustrated attempts, the varying of defeated trials; this way and that at length to hit upon, and by much pains, and with a slow, gradual progress, by the use of who can tell how many sundry sorts of instruments or tools, managed by more (possibly) than a few hands, by long hewing, hammering, turning, filing, to compose one only single machine of such a frame and structure, as that by the frequent reinforcement of a skilful hand, it may be capable of some (and that, other- wise, but a very short-lived) motion ! And is it no argu- ment, or effect of wisdom, so easily and certainly, without labour, error, or disappointment, to frame both so infinite a variety of kinds, and so innumerable individuals of every such kind of living creatures, that cannot only, with the greatest facility, move themselves with so many sorts of motion, dowaiwards, upwards, to and fro, this way or that, with a progressive or circular, a swifter or a slower, motion, at their own pleasure; but can also grow, propagate, see,- hear, desire, jov, &e. ! Is this no work of wisdom, but only blind either fate or chance ! Of how strangely per- verse and odd a complexion is that understanding, (if yet it may be called an understanding,) that can make this judgment ! X. And they think they have found out a rare knack, and that gives "a great relief to their diseased minds, who have learned to call the bodies of living creatures, (even the human not excepted,) by way of diminution, machines, or a sort of automatons engines. But how little cau.se there is to hug or be fond of this fancy, would plainly appear, if, first, we would allow our- .selves leisure to examine with how sviall pretence this ap- pellation is so placed and applied: and, next, if it be applied rightly, to how little purpose it is alleged ; or that it signifies nothing to the exclusion of divine wisdom from the formation of them. And for the first, because we know^ not a better, let it be considered how defective and unsatisfying the account is, which the greatk and justly admired master in this faculty gives, how divers of those things, which he would have to be so, are performed only in the mechanical way. For though his ingenuity must be acknowledged, in his modest exception of sorte noble operations belonging to ourselves from coming under those rigid necessitating laws^ yet certainly, to the severe inquiry of one not partially addicted to the sentiments of so great a wit, because they were his, it would appear there are great defects, and many Cii.u'. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 21 things yet wanting, in the account which is given us of some of the meaner of those functions, which he would attribute only to organized matter, or (to use his own expression) to the conformation of the members of the body, and the course of the spirits, excited by the heat of the heart, &c. For howsoever accurately he describes the instruments and the way, his account seems very little satisfying of the principle, either of spontaneous motion, or of sensation. As to the former, though it be very apparent that the muscles, seated in that opposite posture wherein they are mostly found paired throughout the body, the nerves and the animal spirits in the brain, and (suppose we) that ^Za/i- dide seated in the inmost part of it, are the instruments of the motion of the limbs and the wholebody ; 3'et, what are all these to the prime causation, or much more, to the spon- taneity of this motion 1 And whereas, with us, (who are acknowledged to have such a faculty independent on (he body,) an act of will doth so manifestly contribute, so that, when we will, our body is moved with so admirable faci- lity, and we feel not the cumbersome weight of an arm to be lifted up, or of our whole coporeal bulk, to be moved this way or that, by a slower or swifter motion. Yea, and when as also, if we will, we can, on the sudden, in a very instant, start up out of the most composed, sedentary po.s- ture, and put ourselves, upon occasion, into the most vio- lent course of motion or action. But if we have no such will, though we have the same agile spirits about us, we find no difficulty to keep in a posture of rest ; and are, for the most part, not sensible of any endeavour or urgency of those active particles, as if they were hardly to be restrained from putting us into motion ; and against a reluctant act of our will, we are not moved but with great difficulty to them, and that will give themselves, and us, the trouble. This being, I say, the case with us; and it being also obvious to our observation, that it is so very much alike, in these mentioned respects, with brute creatures, how inconceivable is it, that the directive principle of their motions, and ours, should be so vastly and altogether unlike 1 (whatsoever greater perfection is required, with us, as to those more noble and perfect functions and operations which are found to belong to us.) That is, that in us, an act of will should signify so very much, and be for the most part necessary to the beginning, the continuing, the stopping, or the va- rying of our motions; and in them, nothing like it, nor any thing else besides, only that corporeal principlei which he assigns as common to them and us, the continual heat in the heart, (which he calls a sort of fire,) nourished by the blood of the veins ; the instruments of motion already men- tioned, and the various representations and impressions of external objects, as there and elsewhere™ he expresses him- self ! Upon which last, (though much is undoubtedly to be attributed to it,) that so main a stress should be laid, as to the diversifying of motion, seems strange; when we may observe so various motions of some silly creatures, as of a fly in our window, while we cannot perceive, andean scarce imagine, any change in external objects about them : yea, a swarm of flies, so variously frisking and plying to and fro, some this way, others that, with a thousand di- versities and interferings in their motion, and some resting ; while things are in the same state, externally, to them all. So that Avhat should cause, or cease, or so strangely vary such motions, is from thence, or any thing else he hath said, left unimaginable. As it is much more, how, in creatures of much strength, as a bear or a lion, a paw should be moved sometimes sogently, and sometimes with so mighty force, only by mere mechanism, without any directive principle, that is not altogether corporeal. But most of all, hoAv- the strange regularity of motion in some creatures, as of the spider in making its web, and the like, should be owing to no other than such causes as he hath assigned of the motions in general of brute creatures. And "what though some motions of our own seem wholl}^ invo- limtary, (as that of our eyelids, in the case which he sup- poses,) doth it therefore follow they must proceed from a Erinciple" only corporeal, as if our soul had no other act elonging to it, but that of willing 1 Which he doth not I De Pa.'ssion. part. 1. art. S. m Princip. Philosopli. Dioptric, c. 4. n De Pass. art. 13. Diisert de metliod. downright say ; but that it is its only, or its chief act : and if it be its chief act only, what hinders but that such a motion may proceed from an act that is not chief? Or that it may have a power that may, sometimes, step forth into act (and in greater matters than that) without any- formal deliberated command or direction of our willl So little reason is there to conclude, that all our motions" common to us with beasts, or even their motions them- selves, depend on nothing else than the conformation of the members, and the course which the .spirits, excited by the heat of the heart, do naturally follow, in the brain, the nerves, and the muscles, after the same manner with the motion of an automaton, &c. But as to the matter of sensation, his account seems much more defective and unintelligible, that is, how it should be performed (as he supposes every thing common to us Avith beasts may be) without a soul. For, admit that it be (as who doubts but it is) by the instruments which he assigns, we are still to seek what is the sentient, or what useth these instruments, and dothsentire or exerci.se sense by them. That is, suppose it be perforthed in the brain,P and that (as he says) by the help of the nerves, which from thence, like small strings,i are .stretched forth unto all the other members ; suppose we have the three things to con- sider in the nerves, which he recites — their interior sub- stance, which extends itself like very slender threads from the brain to the extremities of all the other members into which they are laiit; the verj' thin little skins which en- close these, and which, being continued with those that inwrap the brain, do compose the little pipes which contain these threads ; and lastly, the animal spirits which are conveyed dovrn from the brain through these pipes — j'et which of these is most subservient unto sense 1 That he undertakes elsewhere' to declare, riz. that we are not to think (which we also suppose) some nerves to serve for sense, others for motion only, as some have thought, but that the enclosed spirits serve for the motion of the mem- bers, and those little threads (also enclosed) for sense. Are we yet any nearer our puqiose? Do these small threads sentire'? Are these the things that ultimately receive and discern the various impressions of objects'? And since they are all of one sort of substance, how comes it to pass that some of them are seeing threads, others hearing threads, others tasting, &c. Is it from the diverse and commodious figuration of the organs unto which these descend from the brain 1 But though we acknowledge and admire the curi- ous and exquisite formation of those organs, and their most apt usefulness (as organs, or instruments) to the purposes for which they are designed,yet what do they signify,with- out a proportionably apt and able agent to use them, or percipient to entertain and judge of the several notices, which by them are only transmitted from external things 1 That is, suppose we a drop of ever so pure and transparent liquor, or let there be three, diversely tinctured or coloured, and (lest the)' mingle) kept asunder by their distinct, in- folding coats ; let these encompass one the other, and toge- ther compose one little shining globe: are we satisfied that now this curious, pretty ball can see '? Nay, suppose we it ever so conveniently situate ; suppose we the fore-men- tioned strings fastened to it, and these, being hollow, well replenished Avith as pure air or wind or gentle flame as you can imagine ; yea, and all the before-described little threads to boot ; can it yet do the feat 1 Nay, suppose we all things else to concur that Ave can suppose, except a living principle, (call that by Avhat name you will,) and i« it not still as incapable of the act of seeing, as a ball of clay or a pebble stone 1 Or can the substance of the brain itself perform that or any other act of sense, (for it is superfluous to .speak distinctlyof the rest,) any more than the pulpof an apple or a dish of curds'? So that, trace this matter whither you will, within the compass of A'our assigned limits, and you are still at the same loss: range through the Avhole body, and what can you find hut flesh and bones, marroAV and Mood, strings and threads, humour and vapour; and Avhich of these is capable of sense 1 These are your materials and such like; order them as you wiL, put them into Avhat method you can devise, and exceut o As art. 16. q De Passion, art 11. r Dioptr. c. 4. S. 4, 5. p Princip. Pliilosoph. Sect. 189. 23 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 1 vou can make it live, yon cannot make it so much as feel, | to their several functions; it seems a miich more easy rrniCii less perform all other acts of sense besides, unto | performance, and is more conceivable, and within the which these tools alone seem as unproportionable, as a plough-share to the most curious sculpture, or a pair of tongs to the most melodious music. But how much more inconceivable it is, that the figura- tion and concurrence of the fore-mentioned organs can alone suffice to produce the several passions of love, fear, ano-er, &c. whereof we find so evident indications m brute creatures, it i-s enough but to hint. And (but that all per- sons do not read the same books) it were altogether un- necessary to have said so much, after so plain demonstra- tion^ already extant, that matter, howsoever modified, any of the mentioned ways is incapable of sense. Nor would it seem necessary to attempt any thing in this kind, in particular and direct opposition to the very peculiar sentiments of this most ingenious author, (as he will undoubtedly be reckoned in all succeeding time,) who, when he undertakes to show what sense is, and how it is performed, makes it the proper business of the soul, comprehends it under the name of cogitation ;t naming himself a thinking thing, adds by way of question. What is that? and ainswers, A thing doubting, understanding, affirming, denying, willing, nilling, and also imagining, and exercising sense ; says" expressly it is evident to all that it is the soul that exercises sense, not the body,"*' in as direct words as the so much celebrated poet of old. The only wonder is, that under this general name of cogita- tion he denies it unto brutes; under which name, he may be thought less fitly to have included it, than to have af- firmed them incapable of any thing to which that name ought to be applied ; as he doth not only affirm, but es- teems himself by most firm reasons to have proved.^ And yet that particular reason seems a great deal more pious than it is cogent, which he gives for his choosing his particular v;ay of ditferencing brutes from human creatures, viz. lest any prejudice should be done to the doctrine of the human soul's immortality ; there being no- thing, as he truly says, that doth more easily turn ofl' weak minds from the path of virtue, than if they should think the souls of brutes to be of the same nature with our own ; and therefore that nothing remains to be hoped or feared after this life, more by us than by flies or pismires. For surely there were other ways of providing against that danger, besides that of denying them so much as sense, (other than merely organical,> as he somewhere alleviates ihe harshness of that position, but without telling us what useth these organs,) and the making them nothing else but well-formed machines. But yet if we should admit the propriety of this ap- pellation, and acknowledge (the thing itself intended to be signified by it) that all the powers belonging to mere brutal nature are purely mechanical, and no more ; to what purjTOse is it here alleged, or what can it be understood to signify 1 What is lost from our cause by it'? And what have atheists whereof to glory 1 For was the contrivance of these machines theirs 1 Were they the authors of this rare invention, or of any thing like if? Or can they show any product of human device_^and wit, that shall be capable of vying with the strange powers of those machines 1 Or can they imagine what so highly exceeds all human skill, to have fallen by chance, and without any contrivance or design at all. into a frame ca- pable of such powers and operations 1 If they be machines, they are (as that free-spirited au- thor speaks) to be considered a^ a sort of machine^ made by the hand of God, which is by infinite degrees better ordered, and hath in it more admirable motions, than any that could ever have been formed by the art of man. Yea, and we might add, so little disadvantage would accrue to the present cause (whatever might to some other) by this concession, that rather (if it were not a wrong to the cause, which justly disdains we should allege any thing false or uncertain for its support) this would add much, we will not say to its victory, but to its triumph, that -"e did ac- knowledge them nothing else than mere mechsaiical con- trivances. For, since they must certainly eithei be such, or have each of them a soul to animate, anden&ble them nearer reach of human apprehension, that they should be furnished with such a one, than be made capable of so admirable operations without it; and the former (though it were not a surer) were a more amazing, unsearchable, and less comprehensible discovery of the most transcen- dent wisdom, than the latter. XI. But because whatsoever comes tinder the name of cogitation, properly taken, is assigned to some higher cause than mechanism ; and that there are operations belonging to man, which lay claim to a reasonable soul, as the im- mediate principle and author of them; we have yet this further step to advance, that is, to consider the most ap- parent evidence we have of a wise, designing agent, in the powers and nature of this more excellent, and, among things more obvious to our notice,, the noblest of his pro- ductions. And were it not for the slothful neglect of the most to study themselves, we should not here need to recount unto men the common and well-known abilities and excellences which peculiarly belong to their own nature. They might take notice, without being told, that first, as to their intellectual facility, they have somewhat about them, that can think, understand, frame notions of things; that can rectify or supply the false or defective represen- tations which are made to them by their external senses and fancies; that can conceive of things far above the reach and sphere of sense, the moral good or evil of ac- tions or inclinations, what there is in them of rectitude or pravity ; whaceby they can animadvert, and cast their eye inward upon themselves; observe the good or evil acts or inclinations, the knowledge, ignorance, dulness, vigour, tranquillity, trouble, and, generally, the perfections or im- perfections, of their own minds ; that can apprehend the general natures of things, the future existence of what, yet, is not, with the future appearance of that to us, which, as yet, appears not. Of which last sort of power, the confident assertion, " No man can have a conception of the future, "^^ needs not, against our experience, make us doubt ; especially being enforced by no better, than that vleasant reason there subjoined, for the future is not yet ; that is to say, because it is future ; and so (which is all this reason amounts to) we cannot conceive it, because ice cannot. For though our conceptions of former things guide us in forming notions of what is future, yet sure our conception of any thing as future, is much another sort of conception from what we have of the same thing as past, as appears from its different effects; for if an object be apprehended good, we conceive of it as past with sorrow, as future with hope and joy ; if evil, with joy as past, with fear and sor- row as future. And (which above all the rest discovers and magnifies the intellectual power of the human soul) that they can form a conception, howsoever imperfect, ol this absolutely perfect Being, whereof we are discoursing. Which even they that acknowledge not its existence, cannot deny; except they will profess themselves blindly, and at a venture, to deny they know not what, or what they have not so much as thought of. They may take notice of iheiv poiver of comparing things, of discerning and making a judgment of their agreements and disagreements, their proportions and disproportions to one another ; of affirming or denying this or that, con- cerning such or such things; and of pronouncing, with more or less confidence, concerning the truth or falsehood of such affirmations or negations. And moreover, of their fencer of arguing, and infer- ring one thing from another, so as from one plain and evident principle, to draw forth a long chain of conse- quences, that may be discerned to be linked therewith. They have withal to consider the liberty and the large capacity of the human will, which, when it is itself, rejects the dominion of any other than the supreme Lord, and refuses satisfaction in any other than the supreme and most comprehensive good. And upon even so hasty and transient a view of a thing furnished with such powers and faculties, we have suf- B tn Dr. More'3 Immortality of the SouL u Medit. 2. t Princip. Phil, part 4. 189. w Dioptt. c. i X Resp. Bextae. Dissert, de Method. I Dissert, de Method, sect. 5. y Resp. sexfsE. a Hobbes'6 Hu:nan Nature. Chap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 23 ficient occasion to bethink ourselves. How came such a thing as this. into being 1 whence did it spring, or to what original doth it owe itself] More particularly we have here two things to be discoursed. — E^irst, That, notwith- standing so high excellences, the soul of man doth yet aj)- pear to be a caused being, that sometime had a beginning. — Secondly, That, by them, it is sufficiently evident, that it owes itself to a wise and intelligent cause. As to the former of these, we need say the less, because that sort of atheists with whom we have chiefly now to do, deny not human souls to have had a beginning, eis supposing them to be produced by the bodies they animate, by the same generation, and that such generation did sometimes begin ; that only rude and wildly moving matter ■was from eternity ; and that by infinite alterations and commixtures in that eternity, it fell at last into this orderly frame and state wherein things now are, and became pro- lific, so as to give beginning to the several sorts of living things which do now continue to propagate themselves ; the mad folly of which random fancy we have been so largely contending against hitherto. The other sort, w^ho were for an eternal succession of generations, have been sufficiently refuted by divers others, and partly by what hath been already said in this discourse ; and we may further meet with them ere it be long. We in the mean- time find not any professing atheism, to make human souls, as such, necessary and self-originate beings. Yet it is requisite to consider not only what persons of atheistical persuasions have said, but what also they pos- sibly may say. And moreover, some that have been remote from atheism, have been prone, upon the contem- plation of the excellences of the human soul, to over- magnify, yea and even no less than deify, it. It is therefore needful to say somewhat in this matter. For if nothing of direct and downright atheism had been designed, the rash hyperboles, as we will charitably call them, and un- warrantable rhetorjcations of these latter, should they obtain to be looked upon and received as severe and strict assertions of truth, were equally destructive of religion, as the others' more strangely bold and avowed opposition to it. Such, I mean, as have spoken of the souls of men as parts of God,h one thing with him ; a particle of divine breath ; an extract or derivation of himself ; that have not feared to apply to them his most peculiar attributes, or say that of them, which is most appropriate and incommuni- cably belonging to him alone. Nay, to give them his very name, and say in plain words they were God.'^ Now it would render a temple alike insignificant, to suppose no worshipper, as to suppose none who should be worshipped. And what should be the worshipper, w^hen our souls are thought the same thing with what should be the object of our worship 1 But methinks, when we con- sider their necessitous, indigent state, their wants and cravings, their pressures and groans, their grievances and complaints, we should find enough to convince us they are not the self-originate or self-sufficient being ; and might even despair any thing should be plain and easy to them, with whom it is a difficulty to distinguish themselves from God. Why are they in a state which they dislike 1 Where- fore are thej'^ not full and satisfied 1 Why do they wish and complain 1 Is this Godlike 1 But if any have a doubt hanging in their minds concerning the imity of souls with one another, or with the soul of the world, let them read ■what is already extant : and supposing them, thereupon, distinct beings, there needs no more to prove them not to be necessary, independent, uncaused ones,d than their sub- jection to so frequent changes ; their ignorance, doubts, irresolution, and gradual progress to knowledge, certainty, and stability in their purposes ; their very being united with these bodies in which they have been but a little ■while, as we all know ; whereby they undergo no small change, (admitting them to have been pre-existent,) and b Sen. Ep. 92. Hor. Serm. M. Anton. aTTomraafia eavrov. c The Pythagoreans, concerning whom it is said, they were wont to ad- monish one another to take heed, lest they slwiiM rent God in themneli-es.— Mw ^(aOTTav rot; cv eavToti, dcov. Jamblich. de vit. Pylhas. I'l:tti), who undertakes to prove the iramortaJity of the soul by .«uch arHiiment:J as, it' liiev did conchide any thing, would conclude it to be God : thnt it is the liiuntain", the principle [Trnyi. aai apxn] of motion ; and adds, that the principle is un- beeottcn, &c. in Phredone. Makes it the cause of all things, and the nder of &U, Dc Le? 1. 10. though his words there seem meant of the soul of the world. wherein they experience so many. Yea, whether those changes import any immutation of their very essence or no, the repugnancy being so plainly manifest of the very terms, necessary and chaii extr»>me mad- ness. And whether an Identity were not imagined of our souls, with that ot the world, or with find, is too much left in doubt, both as to lum and some ot his followers : to say nothing of modem enthusiasts. <• i o i »» d Dr. Morx 's Poem. Anlimonopsuchia. His Immortality ot tlie Soul, Mr. Baxter's Appendix to the Reasons of Christian Religion, d-c. . „ - e As is to be seen in that accurate discourse of Mr. Locke. His Lssay ol Human Understanding, pubUshed since this was lirst written. 24 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I That the former, speaking of any continned portion of matter, hath parts actually separable ; the other being ad- mitted to have parts too, but that cannot be actually sepa- rated ; with the power of self-contraction, and self-dilata- tion, ascribed to this latter, denied of the former, seem as intelligible differences, and as little liable to exception, as any we can think of Besides what we observe of dulness, inactivity, insensibility, in one sort of substance; and of vigour, activity,, capacity of sensation, and spontaneous motion, with what we can conceive of self-vitality, in this! latter sort; i. e. that whereas matter is only capable of having life imparted to it, from somewhat that lives of itself, created mind or spirit, though depending for its being on the supreme cause, hath life essentially included in that being, so that it is inseparable from it, and it is the same tiling to it, to live, and to be. But a merely materiate being, if it live, borrows its life, as a thing foreign to it, and separable from it. But if, instead of such distinction, we should shortly and at the next have pronounced, that as mind is a cogi- tant substance, matter is incogitant ; how would this have squared with our present inquiry 1 What antagonist would have agreed with us upon this "state of the question"? i. e. in efiect, whether that can i-e,i*^in or think, that is incapa- ble of reason or thought 1 Such, indeed, as have studied more to hide a bad meaning, than express a good, have confounded the terms matter or bodv, and substance. But take we matter as contradistinguished to mind and spirit, as aljove described : and it is concerning this that we in- tend this inquirjr. And here we shall therefore wave the consideration of their conceits, concerning the manner of the first origina- tion of men, who thought their whole being was only a production of the earth. Whereof the philosophical ac- count deserves as much laughter, instead of confutation, as any the most fabulously poetical : that is, how they were formed (as also the other animals) in certain little ba^s, or wombs of the earth, out of which when they grew ripe, they broke forth, f &c. And only consider what is said of the constitution and nature of the human soul itself; which is said to be com- posed of very well polished, the smoothest and the roundest atoms ;? and which are of the neatest fashion, and every way, you must suppose, the best conditioned the whole coiintry could aflbrd ; of a more excellent make, as there is added, than those of the fire itself. And these are the things you must know, which think, study, contemplate, frame .syllogisms, make theorems, lay plots, contrive busi- ness, act the philosopher, the logician, the mathematician, statesman, and every thing else ; only you may except the priest, for of him there was no need. This therefore is our present theme, whether such things as these be capable of such, or any acts of reason, yea or no 1 And if such a subject may admit of serious discourse ; in this way it maybe convenient to proceed, fis. either any such small particle, or atom (for our business is not now with Des Cartes, but Epicurus) alone, is rational, or a good convenient number of them assembled, and most happily met together. It is much to be feared the former way will not do. For we have nothing to consider in any of these atoms, in its solitary condition, besides its magni- tude, its figure, and its weight, and you may add also its motion, if you could devise how it should come by it. And now, because it is not to be thought that all atoms are rational, (for then the stump of a tree or a bundle of straw might serve to make a soul of, for aught we know, as good as the best,) it is to be considered by which of those properties an atom shall be entitled to the privilege of being rational, and the rational atoms be distinguished from the rest. Is it their peculiar magnitude or size that so far ennobles them 1 Epicurus would here have us be- lieve, that the least are the fittest for this turn. Now if you consider how little we must suppose them generally to" be, according to his account of them ; (that is, that looking f Gasscnd. Epicur. Syntag. . g As may be seen in tlie same Syntag. and in Epicunis's Epist. to Herodot. m Laert. 'E5 arojiajv avri^v c-vyKticBJi AnoraToii', Kat rpoyyvXararoif, .u^y^^'^J^!^ it falls out somewhat crossly, that the least (and consequently the lightest) should be thought htter to be the matter of the rational soul, be- cause they are aptest for motion, when yet 110 other cause is assigned of their upon any of those little motes a stream whereof you may perceive when the sun shines in at a window, and he doubts not but many, myriads of even ordinary atoms, go to the composition of any one of these scarcely discernible motes ;) how sportful a contemplation were it, to suppose one of those furnished with all the powers of a reasonable soul ! Though it is likely they would not laugh at the jest, that think thousands of souls might be conveniently placed upon the point of a needle. And yet, which makes the matter more admirable, that very few, except they are very carefully picked and chosen, can be found among those many myriads, but will be too big to be capable of rationality. Here sure the fate is very hard, of those that come nearest the size, but only, by a very little too much corpulency, happen to be excluded, as unworthy to be counted among the rational atoms. But sure if all sober reason he not utterly lost and squandered away among these little entities, it must needs be judged altogether in- comprehensible, why, if upon the account of mere little- ness, any atom should be capable of reason, all should not be so: and then we could not but have a very rational world. At least, the difference in this point being so very small among them, and they being all so very little, me- thinks they should all be capable of some reason, and have only less or more of it, according as they are bigger or less. But there is little doubt, that single property of less mag- nitude, win not be stood upon as the characteristieal diffei- ence of rational and irrational atoms ; and because their more or less gravity is reckoned necessarily and so imme- diately to depend on that, (for those atoms cannot be thought porous, but very closely compacted each one with- in itself,) this, it is likely, will as little be depended on.h And so their peculiar figure must be the more trusted to, as the differencing thing. And because there is in this resjiect so great a variety among this little sort of people, or nation, as this author somewhere calls them, (whereof he gives so punctual an account,* as if he had been the ge- neralissimo of all their armies, and were wont to view them at their rendezvous, to form them into regiments and squad- rons, and appoint them to the distinct services he found them aptest for,) no doubt it was a difficulty to determine which sort of figure was to be pitched on to make up the rational regiment. But since his power was absolute, and there was none to gainsay or contradict, the roimd figure was judged best, and most deserving this honour. Other- wise, a reason might have been asked (and it might have been a greater difficulty to have given a good one) why some other figure might not have done as well ; unless respect were had to fellow-atoras, and that it was thought, they of this figure could better associate for the present purpose ; and that we shall consider of by and by. We now pro- ceed on the supposition that possibly a single atom, by the advantage of this figure, might be judged capable of this high achievement. And in that case, it would not be im- pertinent to inquire whether, if an atom were perfectly round, and .so very rational, but by an unexpected misad- venture, it comes to have one little corner somewhere clapped on, it be hereby quite spoiled of its rationality? And again, whether one that comes somewhat near that figure, only it halh some little protuberances upon it, might not by a little filing, or the friendly rubs of other atoms, become rational 1 And yet, now we think on it, of this im- provement he leaves no hopes, because he tells us, though they have parts, yet they are so solidly compacted that they are by no force capable of dissolution. And so whatever their fate is in this particular, they must abide it without expectation of change. And yet, though we cannot really alter it for the better with any of them, yet we may think as favourably of the matter as we please; and for any thing that yet appears, whatever peculiar claim the round ones lay to rationality, we may judge as well ; and shall not easily be disproved of any of the rest. Upon the whole, no one of these properties alone is likely to make a rational atom : what they will all do, motion besides their CTBAity, which cannot but be more, as they are bigger : (for no doubt if you sliould try them in a pair of scales, the bigjrest would be found to out weigh ;) whence also it should seem to follow, that the heaviest hai-ing most iji them of that wliich is the cause of motion, should be the most move- able, and so by consequence the biggest. i That they are rouiid, oblong, oval, plain, hooked, rough, smooth, buocb backed, &c. Chap. III. THE LIVING TETvIPLE. 25 meeting together, may yet seem a doubt. That is, sup- posing we could hit upon one single atom that is at once of a very little size, and consequently very light and nim- ble, and most perfectly smooth, and unexceptionaWy refund, (and possibly there may be found a good many such,) will not this do the business 1 May we not now hope to have a rational sort of people among them, that is, those of this peculiar family or tribe ■? And yet still the matter will be found 10 go very hard ; for if we cannot imagine or devise how any one of these properties should contribute any thing (as upon our utmost disquisition we certainly can- not) towards the power of reasoning, it is left us altogether unimaginable how all these properties together should make a rational atom ! There is only one relief remaining, that is, what if we add to these other properties some peculiarly brisk sort of actual motion : (for to be barely moveable will not serve, inasmuch as all are so :) but Avill not actual motion, added to its being irreprehensibly little, light, and round, especially if it be a very freakish one, and made up of many odd, unexpected windings, and turns, effect the business 1 Possibly it might do something to actual reasoning, supposing the power were there before: for who can tell but the little thing was fallen asleep, and by this means its power might be awakened into some exercise 1 But that it should give the power itself^ is abov^e all comprehension ; and there is nothing else to give it. These that have been mentioned, being all the prime qualities that are assigned to atoms singly considered^ all others that can be supposed, belonging to concrete bodies, t.hat are composed of many of them meeting together. And therefore hither in the next place our inquiry must be directed, whether any number of atoms, definite or in- definite, being in themselves severally irrational, can be- come rational by association, or compose and make up a rational soul 1 Hitherto it must be acknowledged we have not fought with any adversary ; not having met with any that have asserted the rationality of single, corporeal atoms; yet because we know not what time may produce, and whither the distress and exigency of a desperate cause may drive the maintainers of it, it was not therefore fit to say nothing to that supposable or possible assertion, I mean possible to be asserted, howsoever impossible it is to be true. Nor yet could it well admit of any thing to be said to it, but in that ludicrous and sportful way. If we will sup- pose any to be so foolish, they are to be dealt with accord- ing to their folly. But now as to this other conceit, that atoms, provided the}'' be of the right stamp or kind, may, a competent num- ber of them assembled together, compose a reasonable soul, is an express article of the Epicurean creed. And there- fore, here, we are to deal more cautiously ; not that this is any whit a wiser fancy than the other, but that the truth in this matter is surer to meet with opposition in the minds of some persons, already formed unto that wild apprehen- sion, and tinctured with it. Wherefore such must be desired to consider in the first place, if they will be true disciples of Epicurus through- out, what he affirms of all atoms universally, that they muse be simple, uncompounded bodies, (or, if you will, corpuscles,) not capable of division or section, by no force dissoluble, and therefore immutable, or in themselves void of any mutation. Hereupon let it be next considered, if there were in them, those that are of the right size, shape, and weight, severally, some certain sparks or seeds of reason, (that we may make the supposition as advantageous as we can,) or dispositions thereto, yet how shall it be possible to them to communicate, or have that communion with one another, as tog;etker to constitute an actually and completely rational or thinking thing 1 If everj^ one could bring somewhat to a common stock that might be serviceable to that purpose ; how shall each one's proportion or share be imparted 1 They can none of them emit any thing, there can possibly be no such thing as an cffluvivm from any of them, inas- much a.s they are incapable of diminution ; and are them- selves each of them as little as the least imaginable cffiuvi- um that we would suppose to proceed from this or that par- ticular atom. They can at the most but touch one another ; penetrate, or get into one another they cannot ; insomuch as if any one have a treasure in it, which is in readiness for the making up an intellective faculty or power among them that should be common to them all, yet each one remains so locked up witliin itself, and is so reserved ami incommunicative, that no other, much less the whole body of them, can be any jot the wiser. So that this is like to be a very dull assembly. But then, if there be nothing of reason to be commu- nicated, we are yet at a greater loss; for if it be said, having nothing else to communicate, they communicate themselves, what is that self 1 Is it a rational self? Or is every single atom that enters this composition reason 7 Or is it a principle of reason "? Is it a seed 1 Or is it a part 1 Is it a thought 1 What shall we suppose '? Or what is there in the properties a.ssigned to this sort of atoms that can bespeak it any of these 1 And if none of these can be supposed, Avhat doth their association signily towards ratiocination "? They are little, what doth that contribute? Therefore there may need the more of them to make a good large soul ; but why must a Litlle thing, devoid of reason, contribute more towards it, than another somewhat bigger ? They are liglit, doth that mend the matter l They are the sooner blown away, rhey can the less cohere, or keep together ; they are the more easily capable of dissipation, the less of keeping their places in solemn counsel. They are round, and exactly smooth. But why do they the more convenientl)^ associate upon that account for this purpose 1 They cannot therefore come so close together as they might have done, had they been of various figures. They cannot, indeed, give or receive so rude touches. This signififis somewhat towards the keeping of state, but what doth it to the exercise of reason 1 Their being so perfectly and smoothly round, makes them the more incapable of keep- ing a steady station, they are the more in danger of rolling away from one another; they can upon this account lay no hold of each other. Their counsels and resolves are likely to be the more lubricous, and liable to an uncertain volubility. It is not to be imagined what a collection of individuals, only thus qualified, can do when Xhey are come together, an assembly thus ■constituted. Are we hence to expect oracles, philosophical determinations, max- ims of state '? And since they are supposed to be so much alike, how are the mathematical atoms to be distinguished from the morall those from the politicall the contem- plative from the active ? Or when the assembly thinks fit to entertain itself with matters of this or that kind, what must be its different composure or posture 1 Into what mould or figure must it cast itself for one puipose, and into what, for another"? It is hard to imagine that these little globular bodies, chat we may well suppose to be as like as one egg can be to another, should b}' the mere alteration of their situation, in respect of one another, (and no alteration besides can be .so much as imagined among them,) make so great a change in the complexion of lliis assembly ; so that now, it shall be disposed to seriousness, and by some transposition of the spherical particles, to mirth ; now to business, and by and by to pleasure. And seeing all human souls are supposed made of the same sort of material, how are the atoms modelled in one man, and how in another 1 What atoms are there to dispose to this sect more, and what to another 1 Or if a good reason can be assigned for their difference, what shall be given for their agreement "? Whence is it that there are so manj^, so unquestionable, common notions ever}' where received? Why are not all things transposed in some minds, when such a posture of the atoms as might infer it, is as sujv posable as any other 1 Yea, and since men are found not always to be of one mind with themselves, it is strange and incomprehensible, that such a situation of these atoms, that constitute his ,soul, should dispose him to be of one opinion, and another of another How are they to be ranged when for the afiirmative 1 how for the negative "? And yet a great deal more strange, that since their situa- tion is so soon changed, and so continually changing, (the veiy substance of the soul being supposed nothing else than a thing very like, but a little finer than a busy and continually moving flame of fire,) any man should ever continue to be of the same opinion with himself, one quar- ter of an hour together ; that all notions are not confounded and jumbled ; that the same thing is not thought and un- no THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part. I thought, resolved and unresolved, a thousand times in a day. That is, if any thing could be thought or resolved at all, or, if this were a subject capable of framing or re- ceiving any sort of notion. But still that is the greatest difficulty, how there can be such a thing as thinking, or forming of notions. The case is plain of such notions as have no relation to matter, or dependence upon external sense. For what doth contri- bute to my contemplation of my own mind, and its acts and powers; to my animadversion, or knowing that I think, or will, this or that 1 But besides, and more generally, what proportion is there between a thought and the" motion of an atom "? Will we appeal to our faculties, to our reason itself? And whither else will we ] Is there any cognation or kindred between the ideas we have of these things, the casual agitation of a small particle of matter, (be it as little or as round as we please to imagine,) and an act of intellection or judgment 1 And what il' there be divers of them toge- ther 1 What can they do more towards the composing an intelligent thing, than many ciphers to the arithmetical composition of a number ■? It would be as rational to suppose a heap of dust, by long lying together, might at last become rational. Yes, these are things that have, some way or other, the power of motion ; and what can they effect by that I They can frisk about, and ply to and fro, and interfere among themselves, and hit, and justle, and tumble over one another, and that will contribute a great deal; about as much, we may suppose, as the shak- ing of such dust well in a bag, by which means it might possibly become finer and smaller something; and by continuing that action, at length rational ! No; but these atoms, of which the soul is made, have a greater advan- tage by their being disposed into a so well-contrived and filly organized receptacle as the body is. It is indeed true, and admirable, that the body is, as hath been before ob- served, so fitly framed for the purposes whereto the whole of it, and its several parts, are designed. But how imfitly is that commodious structure of it so much as mentioned, by such as will not allow themselves to o^vn and adore the wisdom and power of its great Architect. And what if the composure of the body be so apt and useful ; so excellent in its own kind ; is it so in every kind, or to all imagmable purposes "? Or what purpose can we possibly imagine more remote or foreign to the com- position of the body, than that the power of ratiocination should be derived thence 1 It might as well be said it was so made, to whirl about the sun, or to govern the motions of the moon and stars, as to confer the power of reason, or enable the soul to think, to understand, to deliberate, to will, &c. Yea, its organs, some-of them, are much more proportionable to those actions, than any of them unto these. Which, though a well-habited body, while the soul remains in this imprisoned state, do less hinder, yet how doth it help 1 And that it might perform these acts without bodily organs, is much more apprehensible than how they can properlj^be said to be performed by them. And that, though they are done in the body, they would be done much better out of it. But shall it be granted that these soul-constituting atoms, till they be (or otherwise than as they are) united with a duly organized body, are utterly destitute of any reasoning or intelligent power 1 Or are they, by themselves, apart from this grosser body, irrational 1 If this be not granted, the thing we intend must be argued out. Either, then, they are, or they are not. If the latter be said, then they have it of themselves, without dependence on the organized body ; and so we are fairly agreed to quit that pretence, without more ado, of their partaking reason from thence. And are only left to weigh over again what hath been already said to evince the contrary, that is, how manifestly absurd it is, to imagine that particles of matter, by their peculiar size, or weight, or shape, or motion, or all of these together: and that, whether single or associated, should he capable of reasoning. If the former be the thing which is resolved to be stuck to, that is, that they are of them- selves irrational, but they become reasonable b}^ their being united in such a prepared and organized body, this requires to be a little further considered. And to this purpose it is necessary to obviate a pitiful shift that it is possible some may think fit to use, for the avoiding the force of this dilemma; and may rely upon as a ground, why they may judge this choice the more secure; that is, that they say they are rational by dependence on the body they animate ; because they are only f^ound so imited with one another there; that there they have the first coalition; there they are severed from such as serve not this turn ; there they are pent in, and held together as long as its due temperament la.sts ; which, when it fails, they are dissipated, and so lose their great advantage for the acts of reason, which they had in such a body. What pleasure soever this may yield, it wdl soon appear it does them little service. For it only implies, that they have their rationality of themselves, so be it that they were together ; and not immediately from the body ; or any otherwise, than that they are somewhat beholden to it, for a fair occasion of being together ; as il it were, else, an unlawful assembly ; or that they knew not, otherwise, how to meet and hold together. They will not say that the body gives them being, for they are eternal, and self-subsisting, as they will have it. Yea, and of themselves (though the case be otherwise with the Car- tesian particles) undiminishable, as to their size, and, as to their figure and weight, unalterable ; so that they have neither their littleness, their roundness, nor their lightness, from the body, but only their so happy meeting. Admit this, and only suppose them to be met out of the body. And why may not this be thought supposable 1 If they be not rational till they be met, they cannot have wit enough to scruple meeting, at least someM'here else, than in the body. And who knows but such a change may happen 1 As great as this, are by these persons supposed to have happened, before the world could have come to this pass it is now at ; who can tell but such a number of the same sort of atoms (it being natural for things so much of a com- plexion and temper to associate and find out one another) might ignorantly, and thinking no harm, come together 1 And having done so, why might they not keep together "? Do they need to be pent in 1 How are they pent in, whilsL in the body ■? If they be disposed, they have ways enough to get out. And if they must needs be inclined to scatter when the crasis of the body fails, surely a way might be found to hem them in, if that be all, at the time of expira- tion, more tightly and closely, than they could be in the body. And what reason can be devised, why, being be- come rational, by their having been assembled in the body, they may not agree to hold together, and do so in spite of fate, or maugre all ordinary accidents, when they find it convenient to leave it 1 And then upon these no-way im- possible suppositions, (according to their principles, so far as can be understood, with whom we have to do,) will they now be rational out of the body 1 Being still endowed (as they cannot but be) with the same high privileges of being little, round, and light, and being still also together; and somewhat more, it may be, at liberty, to roll and tumble, and mingle with one another, than in the body1 If it be now affirmed, they will, in this case, be rational, at least as long as they hold together, then we are but where we were. And this shift hath but diverted us a little ; but so, as it Avas easy to bring the matter, again, about, to the same point we were at before. Wherefore the shelter of the body being thus quite again forsaken, this poor expulsed crew of dislodging atoms are exposed to fight in the open air, for their rationality, against all that was said before. But if this refuge and sanctuary of the body be not merely pretended to, but really and plainly trusted in, and stuck to, then are we sincerely and honestly to consider what a body so variously organized can do, to make such a party of atoms (that of themselves are not so, singly, nor together) become rational. And surely, if the cause were not saved before, it is now deplorate, and lost without remedy. For what do they find here that can thus, be- yond all expectation, improve them to so high an excel- lency"? Is it flesh, or blood, or bones, that puts this stamp upon theml Think, what is the substance of the nobler parts, the liver, or heart, or brain, that they should turn these, before, irrational atoms, when they fall into them, into rational, any more than if they were well soaked in a quagmire, or did insinuate themselves into a piece ol soft dough 1 But here they meet with a benign and kindly Chap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 27 heat and warmth, which comfortably fosters and cherishes them, till at length it hath hatched them into rational. But methinks they should be warm enough of themselves, since they are supposed so much to resemble fire. And, however, wherein do we find a flame of fire more rational, than a piece of ice 1 Yea, but here they find a due temper of moisture as well as heat. And that surely doth not signify much; for if the common maxim be true, that the dry soul is the wisest, they might have been much wiser, if they had kept themselves out of the body. And since it is necessary the soul should consist of that peculiar sort of atoms before described; and the organical body (which mu.st be said for distinction sake, the soul being all this while supposed a body also) consists of atoms too, that are of a -much coarser alloy, methinks a mixture should not be necessary, but a hinderance, and great debasement, ra- ther, to this rational composition. Besides, that it cannot be understood, if it were necessary these atoms should receive any tincture from the body, in order to their being rational, what they can receive, or how they can receive any thing. They have not pores that can admit an adven- titious moisture, though it were of the divinest nectar, and the body could never so plentifully furnish them with it. Wherein then lies the great advantage these atoms have by being in the body, to their commencing rational! If there be such advantage, why can it not be understood 1 Why is it not assigned '? Why should we further spend our guesses what may possibly be saidl But yet, may not much be attributed to the convenient and well-fenced cavity of the brain's receptacle, or the more seci-et cham- bers within that, where the studious atoms may be very private and free from disturbance ] Yet sure it is hard to say, why they that are wont to do it here, might not as well philosophize in some well-chosen cavern, or hole of a rock ; nor were it impossible to provide them t/iere, wdth as soft a bed. And yet would it not be some relief to speak of the fine slender pipes, winding to and fro, wherein they may be conveyed so conveniently from place to place, that if they do not fall into a reasoning humour in one place, they may in another 1 Why, what can this do 1 It seems somewhat like Balaam's project, to get into a vein of in- cantation, by changing stations. And transplace them as you will, it requires more magic than ever he was master of, to make those innocent, harmless things, masters of reason. For do but consider, what if you had a large phial capa- ble of as great a quantity as you can think needful, of very fine particles, and replenished with them, closely stopped, and well luted ; suppose these as pure and fit for the pur- pose as you can imagine, only not yet rational ; will their faring to and fro, through very close and stanch tubes, from one such receptacle to another, make them at last beccane sol It seems then, do what you will with them, toss and tumble them hither and thither, rack them from vessel to vessel, try what methods you can devise of sublimation or improvement, every thing looks like a vain and hopeless essay. For indeed, do what you please or can think of, they are such immutable entities, you can never make them less, or finer, than they originally were : and rational they were not, before their meeting in the body ; wherefore it were a strange wonder, if that should so far alter the case with them, that they should become rational by it. XIII. And now I must, upon the whole, profess not to be well pleased with the strain of this discourse ; not that I think it unsuitable to its subject, (for I see not how it is fitly to be dealt with in a more serious way,) but that I dislike the subject. And were it not that it is too obvious, how prone the minds of some are to run themselves into any the grossest absurdities rather than admit the plain and easy sentiments of religion ; it were miserable tritlnig to talk at this rate, and a loss of time not to be endured. But when an unaccountable aversion to the aclniowledg- ment and adoration of the ever-blessed Deity, hurries away men, affrighted and oflended at the lustre of his so mani- fest appearances, to take a bad, but the only shelter the case can admit, under the wings of any the most silly, foolish figment ; though the ill temper and dangerous state of the persons is to be thought on with much pity, yet the things which they pretend being in themselves ri^diculous, if we will entertain them into our thoughts at all, cannot . fitly be entertamed but with derision. Nor doth it more unbecome a seriotis person to laugh at what is ridiculous, than gravely to weigh and ponder what is weighty and considerable; provided he do not seek occasion of that former sort, on purpose to gratify a vain humour ; but only allow himself to discourse suitably to them, when they occur. And their dotage who would fain serve themselves of so wildly extravagant and impossible suppositions, for the fostering their horrid misbelief, that they have no God to worship, would certainly justify as sharp"ironies, as the prophet Elijah bestows upon them who worshipped Baal, instead of the true God. XIV. Nor is any thing here said intended as a reflection on such as, being unfurnished with a notion of created, intelligent spirits, that might distinguish their substance from the mo.st subtile matter, have therefore thought that their mind or thinking power might have sonae such sub- slratum, unto which it is superadded, or impressed thereon hy a divine hand; in the meantime not doubting their immortality, much less the existence of a Deity, the Author and former of them, and all things. For they are no way guilty of that blasphemous nonsense, to make them consist of necessary, self-subsistent matter, every minute particle whereof is judged eternal and immutable, and in themselves, for aught we can find asserted, destitute of reason ; and which yet acquire it by no one knows what coalition, without the help of a wise efficient, that shall direct and order it to so imimaginable an improvement. These persons do only think more refined matter capable of that impression and stamp ; or of having such a powef put into it, by the Creator's all-disposing hand. Wherein, to do them right, though they should impose somewhat hardly upon themselves, if they will make this estimate of the natural capacity of matter; or if they think the acts and ptiwer of reason in man, altogether unnatural to him; yet they do, in effect, the more befriend the cause we are pleading for ; (as much as it can be befriended by a mis- apprehension ; which yet is a thing of that untoward genius, and doth so ill consort with truth, that it is never admitted as a friend, in any one respect, but it repays it with a mischievous revenge, in some other; as misht many ways be shown in this instance, if it were within the com- pass of our present design ;) it being evident, that if any portion of matter shall indeed be certainly found the actual subject of such powers, and to have such operations be- longing to it, there is the plainer and more undeniable necessity and demonstratian of his power and wisdom, v.'ho can make an)' thing of any thing ; of stones raise up children to Abraham I and who shall then have done that which is so altogether impossible, except him to whom all things are possible 1 There is the more manifest need of his hand to heighten dull matter, to a qualifiedness for performances so much above its nature; to make the loose and independent parts of so fluid matter cohere and hold together ; that, if it were once made capable of knowledge, and the actnal subject of it, whatsoever notions were impressed thereon, might not be, in a mo- ment, confovmded and lost: as indeed they could not b\U be, if the particles of matter were the immediate seat of reason ; and so steady a hand did not hold them, in a settled composure, that they be not disordered, and mea have, thence, the necessity of beginning afresh, to kTiour any thing, every hour of the day. Though yet it seems a great deal more reasonable to suppose the souls of men to be of a substance in itself more consistent, and more agreeable to our experience ; who find a continual ebbing and flowing of s]nrits, without being sensible of any so notable and sudden changes in our knowledge, as we could not but, thereupon, observe in ourselves ; if they, or any as fluid finer matter, were the immediate subjects of it. It is therefore however sufficiently evident, and out of question, that the human soul (be its own substance what it will) must have an efficient diverse from matter; which it was our present intendment to evince. And so our way is clear to proceed to, XV. The second inquiry, whether it be not also mani- fest, from the powers and operations which belong to it as it is reasonable, that it must have had an intelligent ef- ficient ? That is, since we find, and are assured, that there is a sort of being in the world (yea somewhat of ourselves, 28 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I, and that hath best right, of any thing else about us, to be called ourselves) that can think, understand, deliberate, argue, &c. and which we can most certainly assure our- selves (whether it were pre-existent in any former state, or no) is not an independent orimcaused being, and hath there- fore been the efi'ect of some cause ; whether it be not ap- parently the eflect of a wise caused And this, upon supposition of what hath been before proved, seems not liable to any the least rational doubt. For it is already apparent, that it is not itself matter ; and if it were, it is however the more apparent, that its cause is not matter; inasmuch, as if it be itself matter, its powers and operations are so much above the natural capacity of matter, as that it must have had a cause, so much more noble and of a more perfect nature than that, as to be able to raise and improve it, beyond the natural capacity of matter : which it was impossible for that, itself, to do. Whence it is plain, it must. have a cause diverse from matter. Wherefore this its immaterial cause must either be wise and intelligent, or not so. But is it possible any man should ever be guill}^ of a greater absurdity than to ac- knowledge some certain immaterial agent, destitute of wisdom, the only cause and fountain of all that wisdom, that is, or hath ever been, in the whole race of mankind. That is as nmch as to say, that all the wisdom of mankind hath been caiised without a cause. For it is the same thing, after we have acknowledged any thing to be caused, to say it was caused by no cause, as to say it was caused by such a cause as hath nothing of that in it, whereof we find somewhat to be in the etfect. Nor can it avail any thing, to speak of the disproportion or supeiior excellency in some etlects to their second, or to their only partial causes. As that there are sometimes learned children of unlearned parents. For who did ever in that case say the parents were the productive causes of that learning 1 or of them, as they were learned'! Sure that learning comes from some other cause. But shall it then be said, the souls of men have received their being from some such immaterial agent destitute of wisdom; and afterward, their wisdom and intellectual ability came some other way; by their own observation, or by institution and precept, from others 1 Whence then came their capacity of observing, or of receiving such instruction 1 Can any thing naturally des- titiite even of seminal reason, (as we may call it,) or of any aptitude or capacity tending thereto, ever be able to make observations, or receive instructions, whereby at length it may become rational 1 And is not that capacity of the soul of man a real something 1 Or is there no difler- ence between being capable of reason and incapable'? What, then, did this real something proceed from nothing 1 Or was the soul itself caused, and this its capacity un- caused '? Or was its cause, onl}^, capable of intellectual perfection, but not actually furnished therewith'? But if it were only capable, surely its advantages for the actual attainment thereof have been much greater than ours. Whence it were strange if that capacity should never have come into act. And more strange, that we should know, or have any ground to pretend, that it hath not. But that there was an actual exercise of wisdom in the production of the reasonable soul is most evident. For is it a neces- sary being '? That we have proved it is not. It is therefore a contingent, and its being depended on a free cause, into ■whose pleasure, only, it was resolvable, that it should be or not be ; and which therefore had a dominion over its own acts. If this bespeak not an intelligent agent, what doth'? And thoirgh this might also be said concerning every thing else which is not necessarily, and so might yield a more general argument to evince a free designing cause ; yet it concludes Avith greater evidence concerning the rea- sonable soul, whose powers and operations it is so mani- festly impossible should have proceeded from matter. And therefore even that vain and refuted pretence itself, that other things might, by the necessary laws of its motion, become what they are, can have less place here. Whence it is more apparent that the reasonable soul must have had a free and intelligent cause, that used liberty and counsel, in determining that it should be, and especially that it should be such a sort of thing as we find it is. For when we see how aptly its powers and faculties serve for their proper and peculiar operations, who that is not beside himself can think that such a thing was made by one that knew not what he was doing 1 or that such powers were not given on purpose for such operations'? And what is the capacity, but a power that should sometime be reduced into act, and arrive to the exercise of reason itself 1 Now was it possible any thing should give that power that had it not any way '? That is, in the same kind, or in some more excellent and noble kind 1 For we contend not that this Agent whereof we speak is in the strict and pro- per sense rational, taking that term to import an ability or faculty of inferring what is less known from what is more. For we suppose all things equally known to him, (which, so far as is requisite to our present design, that is, the repre- senting him the proper object of religion, or of that honour which the dedication of a temple to him imports, we may in due time come more expressly to assert,) and that the Imowledge which is with us the end of reasoning, is in him in its highest perfection, without being at all beholden to that 7iicans ; that all the connexion of things with one an- other lie open to one comprehensive view, and are known to be connected, but not because they are so. We say, is it conceivable that man's knowing power should proceed from a cause that hath it not, in the same, or this more perfect kind ■? And may use those words to this purpose, not for their aiUhority, (which we expect not should be here significant,) but the convincing evidence they carry with them, "He that teacheth man knowledge, shall not he know '? " That we may drive this matter to an issue, it is evident the soul of man is not a necessary, self-originate thing ; and had therefore some cause. We find it to have knowledge, or the power of knowing, belonging to it. Therefore we say. So had its cause. We rely not here upon the credit of vulgar maxims, (whereof divers might be mentioned,) but the reason of them, or of the thing itself we allege. And do now speak of the whole, entire cause of this being, the human soul, or of whatsoever is casual of it ; or of' any perfection naturally appertaining to it. It is of an intelligent nature. Did this intelligent na- ture proceed from an unintelligent, as the whole and only cause of it 1 That were to speak against our own eyes, and most natural, common sentiments ; and were the same thing as to say that something came of nothing. For it is all one to say so, and to say that any thing communicated what it had not to communicate. Or (which is alike madly absurd) to say that the same thing was such, and not such, intelligent, and not intelligent, able to communicate an intelligent nature, (for sure what it doth it is able to do,) and not able, (for it is not able to communicate what it hath not,) at the same time. It is hardly here worth the while to spend time in coun- termining that contemptible refuge, (which is as incapable of oflending us, as of being defended,) that human souls may perhaps only have proceeded in the ordinary course of generation from one another. For that none have ever said any thing to that purpose deserving a confutation, ex- cept that some sober and pious persons, for the avoiding of some other ditficulties, have thought it more safe to as- sert the traduction of human souls, who yet were far enough from imagining that they could be total, or first causes to one another: and doubted not, but they had the constant necessary assistance of that same Being we are pleading for, acting in his own sphere, as the first cause in all such, as well as any other, productions. Wherein they nothing oppose the main design of this discourse ; and therefore it is not in our way, to off"er at any opposition unto them. But if any have a mind to indulge themselves the liberty of so much dotage, as to say the souls of men were first and only causes to one another; either they must suppose them to be material beings ; and then we refer them to what hath been already said, showing that their powers and operations cannot belong to matter, nor arise from it; or immaterial, and then they cannot produce one another in the way of generation. For of what pre-existent sub- stance are they made 1 Theirs who beget them 1 Of that they can part with nothing ; separability, at least, of parls being a most confessed property of matter. Or some other 1 Where will they find that other spiritual substance, that belonged not inseparably to some individual being Chap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 29 before 1 And besides, if it were pre-existent, as it must be if a soul be generated out of it, then tliey were not the first and only causes of this production. And in another \Fay than that of generation, how will any form the notion of making a soul 1 Let experience and the making of trial convince the speculators. By what power, or by what art, will they make a reasonable soul spring up out of nothing 1 It might be hoped that thus, without disputing the pos- sibility of an eternal, successive production of souls, this shift may appear vain. But if any will persist, and say, that how, or in what way soever they are pro'^'uced, it is strange if they need any nobler cause than them.selves; for may not any living thing well enough be thought ca- pable of producing another of the same kind, of no more than equal perfection with itself 1 To this we say, besides thai no one living thing is the only cause of another such, yet if that were admitted possible, what will it avail 1 For iiath every soul that hath ever existed, or been in being, been produced, in this way, by another 1 This it were ridiculous to say, for if every one were so produced, there was then so7ae one, before every one ; inasmuch as that which produces, must .surely have been before that which is produced by it. But how can every one have one before it 1 A manifest contradiction in the very terms ! For then there will be one without the compass of every one. And how is it then said to be every one T There is then it seems one besides, or more than all. And so all is not all. And if this be thought a sophism, let the matter be soberly considered thus : The soul of man is either a thing of that nature universally (and consequently every indi- vidual soul) as that it doth exist of itself, necessarily and independently, or not. If it be, then we have, however, a wise intelligent being necessarily existing, the thing we have been proving all this while. Yet this concession Ave will not accept, for though it is most certain there is such a being, we have also proved the human soul is not it. Whence it is evidently a dependent being, in its own na- ture, that could never have been of itself, and consequently not at all, had it not been put into being by somewhat else. And being so in its own nature, it must be thus with every one that partakes of this nature. And consequently it must be somewhat of another nature that did put the souls of men into being. Otherwise, the whole stock and line- age of human souls is said to have been dependent on a productive cause, and yet had nothing whereon to depend : and so is both caused by another, and not caused. And therefore since it is hereby evident it was somewhat else, and of another nature, than a human soul, by which all human souls were produced into being : we again say, that distinct being either was a dependent, caused being, or not. If not, it being proved that the soul of man can- not but have had an intelligent or wuse cause, we have no^v what we seek — an independent, necessary, intelligent being, if it do depend, or any will be so idle to say so ; that, however, will infallibly and very speedily lead us to the same mark. For though some have been pleased to dream of an infinite succession of individuals of this or that kind, I suppose we have no dream as yet, ready formed, to come binder confutation, of infinite kinds or orders of beings, gradually superior, one above another; the inferior still depending on the superior, and all upon nothing. And therefore, I conceive, we may fairly take leave of this ar- gument from the human soul, as having gained from it sufficient evidence of the existence of a necessary being, that is intelligent, and designedly active, or guided by wisdom and counsel, in what it doth. We migh.t also, if it were needful, further argue the same thing from a power or ability manifestly superior to, and that exceeds the utmost perfection of, human nature, viz. that of prophecy, or the prediction of future contingen- cies ; yea, and from another that exceeds the whole sphere of all created nature, and which crosses and countermands the known and stated laws thereof, viz. that of working miracles; both of them exercised with manifest design ; as might evidently be made appear, by manifold instances, to as many as can believe any thing to be true, more than what they have seen with their own eyes ; and that do not take present sense, yea, and their owm only, to be the alone measure of all reality. But it is not necessary we insist upon every thing that may be .said, so that enough be said to serve our present purpose. XVI. And that our purpose may yet be more fully served, and such a being evidenced to exist as we may with satisfaction esteem to merit a temple with us, and the religion of it, it is necessary that we add somewhat con- cerning, 9. The divine goodness; for unto that eternal Being, whose existence we have hitherto asserted, goodness also cannot but appertain ; together with those his other attri- butes we have spoken of It is not needful here to be curious about the usual .scholastical notions of goodness, or what it imports, as it is wont to be attributed to being in the general, what, as it belongs in a peculiar sense to intellectual beings, or what more special import it may have, in reference to this. That which we at present chiefly intend by it, is a propen- sion to do good with delight ; or most freely, without oi her inducement than the agreeablencss of it to his nature who doth it; and a certain delectation and complacency, which, hence, is taken in so doing. The name of goodness (though thus it more peculiarly signifies the particular virtue of liberality) is of a significancy large enough, even in the moral acceptation, to comprehend all other perfections or virtues, that belong to, or may any way commend, the will of a free agent. These therefore we exclude not ; and particularly whatsoever is wont to be signified, as attri- butable unto God, by the names of holiness, as a steady inclination unto what is intellectually pure and comely, with an aversion to the contrary; justice, as that signifies an inclination to deal equally, which is included in the former, yet as more expressly denoting what is more proper to a governor over others, viz. a resolution not to let the transgressions of laws, made for the preservation of com- mon order, pa.ss without due animadversion and punish- ment ; tnith, whose signification also may be wholly con- tained under those former more general terms, but' more directly contains sincerity, unaptness to deceive, and con- stancy to one's word: for these may properly be styled good things in a moral sense ; as many other things might, in another notion of goodness, which it belongs not to our present design to make mention of But these are men- tioned as more directly tending to represent to us an amia- ble object of religion ; and are referred hither, as they fitly enough may, out of an unwillingness to multiply, with- out necessity, particular heads or subjects of discourse. In the meantime, as was said, what we principally in- tend, is. That the Being who.se existence we have been endeavouring to evince, is good, as that imports a ready inclination of will to communicate unto others what may be good to them ; creating, first, its own object, and then issuing forth to it, in acts of free beneficence, suitable to the nature of every thing created by it. Which, though it be the primary or first thing carried in the notion of this goodness, vet because that inclination is not otherwise good than as it consists with holiness, justice, and truth, these therefore may be esteemed, secondarily at least, to belong to it, as inseparable qualifications thereof Wherefore it is not a merelynatural and necessan.' ema- nation we here intend, that prevents any act or exerci.se of counsel or design; which would no way consist with the liberty of the divine will, and would make the Deity as well a necessary Agent, as a necessary Being; yea. and would therefore make all the creatures merely natural and necessary emanations, and so destroy the distinction of necessary and contingent beings : and, by consequence, bid fair to the making all things God. It would infer not only the eternity of the world, but would seem to infer either the absolute infinity of it, or the perfection of it, and of every creature in it, to that degree, as that nothing could be more perfect in its own kind, than it is ; or would infer the finiteness of the divine Being. For it would make what he hoih done the adequate measure of what he con do, and would make all his administrations necessary, yea_ and all the actions of men, and consequently take awav all law and government out of the world, and all measures of right and wron?, and make all punitive justice, barbar- ous cruelty: and consequently, give us a notion of good- ness, at length, plaini)' inconsistent with itself All this is provided against, by our having first asserted 30 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 1. the wisdom of that Being, whereunto we also attribute goodness ; which guides all the issues of it, according to those measures or rules which the essential rectitude of the divine will gives, or rather is, unto it : whereby also a foundation is laid of answering such cavils against the divine goodness, as they are apt to raise to themselves, who are wont to magnify this attribute to the suppression of others ; which is, indeed, in the end, to magnify it to nothing. And such goodness needs no other demonstra- tion, than the visible instances and effects we have of it in the creation and conservation of this world ; and parti- cularly, in his large, munificent bounty and kindness to- wards man, whereof his designing him for his temple and residence, will be a full and manifest proof. And of all this, his own self-sutHcient fulness leaves it impossible to us to imagine another reason, than the de- light he takes in dispensing his own free and large com- munications. Besides, that when we see some semblances and imitations of this goodness in the natures of some men, which we are sure are not nothing, they must needs pro- ceed from something, and have some fountain and original, which can be no other than the common Cause and Au- thor of all things. In whom, therefore, this goodness doth firstly and most perfectly reside. CHAPTER IV. Generally all supposable perfection asserted of tliis Being ; wliero, First, A be- ing al)Solutely perfect is endeavoured tobe evinced fruni Ihc (alicaily proved) necessary being ; which is shown to import, in the gcniral llir utmost ful- ness of being. Also divers things in particular that tend Ui o\iu(:e fliut gene- ral. As that it is at the remotest distance from no being. Most purely act ual. Most abstracted being. The productive and conserving cause of all things else. Undiminishable. Incapable of addition. Stcondly. Hence is more expressly deduced, the infiniteness of this being. An inquiry whether it be possil)le the creature can be actually infinite? Difficulties concerning: the absolute fulness and infiniteness of God considered. 2. The onliness of tliis beins. The Trinity not thereby excluded. I. SoMK account has been thus far given of that Being, whereunto we have been designing to assert the honour of a temple. Each of the particulars having been severally insisted on, that concur to make up that notion of this being, which was at first laid down. And more largely, what hath been more opposed, by persons of an atheistical or irreligious temper. But because, in that fore-mentioned account of God, there was added to the particulars there enumerated, (out of a just consciousness of human inabili- ty to comprehend every thing that may possibly belong to him,) this general supplement, " That all other supposa- ble excellences whatsoever, do in the highest perfection appertain also originally unto this Being," it is requisite that somewhat be said concerning this addition. Espe- cially in as much as it comprehends in it, or may infer, some things (not yet expressly mentioned) which may be thought necessary to the evincing the reasonablene.ss of religion, or our self-dedication as a temple to him. For instance, it may po.ssibly be alleged, that if it were admitted there is .somewhat that is eternal, uncaused, in- dependent, necessarily existent, that is self-active, living, powerful, wise, and good ; yet all this will not infer upon us a universal obligation to religion, unless it can also be evinced, I. That this Being is every way sufficient to sup- ply and satisfy all our real wants and just desires. And, 2. That this Being is but one, and so that all be at a cer- tainty where their religion ought to terminate ; and that the worship of every temple must concentre and meet in the same object. Now the eviction of an absolutely perfect Being would include each of these ; and answer both the purposes which may seem hitherto not so fully satisfied. It is therefore requisite that we endeavour. First, To show that the Being hitherto described is ab- solutely or every way perfect. Secondly, To deduce, from the same grounds, the abso- lute infinity, and the unity or the onliness thereof, II. And for the former part of this undertaking, it mu.st be acknowledged absolute or universal perfection cannot be pretended to have been expressed in any, or in all the works of God together. Neither in number, for aught we know, (for as we cannot conceive, nor consequently speak. of divine perfections, but under the notion of many, what- soever their real identity may be, so we do not know, but that within the compass of universal perfection there may be some particular ones, of Avhich there is no footstep in the creation, and whereof we have never formed any thought,) nor (more certainly) in degree ; for surely the world, and the particular creatures in it, are not so perfect in correspondence to those attributes of its great Architect, which we have mentioned, viz. his power, wisdom, and goodness, as he might have made them, if he had pleased. And indeed, to say the world were absolutely and univer- sally perfect, were to make that God. Wherefore it must also be acknowledged that an abso- lutely perfect being cannot be immediately demonstrated from its efiects, as whereto they neither do, nor is it within the capacity of created nature that they can, adequately correspond. Whence, therefore, all that can be done for the evincing of the absolute and universal perfection of God, must be in some other M^ay or method of discourse. And though it be acknowledged that it cannot be imme- diately evidenced from the creation, yet it is to be hoped that mediately it may. For from thence (as we have seen) a necessary self-originate being, such as hath been descri- bed, is, with the greatest certainty, to be concluded ; and, from thence, if we attentively consider, we shall be led to an absolutely perfect one. That is, since we have the same certainty of such a necessary self-originate being, as we have that there is any thing existent at all ; if we seriously weigh what kind of being this must needs be, or what its notion must import, above what hath been already evinced; we shall not be found, in this way, much to fall short of our present aim, though we have also other evidence that may be produced in its own fitter place. Here therefore let us awhile make a stand, and more distinctly consider how far we are already advanced, that we may with the better order and advantage make our further progress. These two things, then, are already evident : L That there is a necessary being that hath been eternally of itself, without dependence upon any thing, either as a productive or conserving cause ; and, of itself, full of activity and vital energy, so as to be a productive and sustaining cause to other things. Of this any the most confused and indis- tinct view of this world, or a mere taking notice that there is any thing in being that lives and moves, and withal that alters and changes, (which it is impos,sible the necessary being itself should do,) cannot but piTt us out of doubt. 2. That this necessary, self-originate, vital, active being, hath very vast power, admirable wisdom, and most free and large goodness belonging to it. And of this, our nearer and more deliberate view and contemplation of the world do equally ascertain us. For of these things we find the manifest prints and footsteps in it. Yea, we find the derived things themselves, power, wisdom, goodness, in the creatures : and we are most assured they have not sprung from nothing; nor from any thing that had them not. And that which originally had them, or was their first fountain, must have them necessarily and essentially, (together with whatsoever else belongs to its being,) in and of itself So that the asserting of any other necessary being, that is in itself destitute of these things, signifies no more towards the giving any account how these things came to be in the world, than if no being, necessarily existing, were asserted at all. We are therefore, by the exigency of the case itself, con.strained to acknowledge, not only that there is a necessary being, but that there is such a one as could be, and was, the fountain and cause of all those several kinds and degrees of being and per- fection that we take notice of in the world besides. Ano- ther sort of necessary being should not only be asserted to no purpose, there being nothing to be gained by it, no imaginable use to be made of it, as a principle that can serve any valuable esd ; (for suppose such a thing as ne- cessary matter, it will, as hath been shown, be unalterable; and therefore another sort of matter must be supposed be- sides it, that may be the matter of the universe, raised up out of nothing for that purpose, unto which this so un- wieldy and unmanageable an entity can never serve ;) but also it will be impossible to be proved. No man can be able with any plausible show of reason to make it out. :,HAP. IV. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 31 Yea, and much may he said, 1 conceive with convincing evidence, against it. As may perhaps be seen in the sequel of this discourse. In the meantime, that there is, however, a necessary being, unto which all the perfections whereof we have any footsteps or resemblances in the creation do originally and essentially belong, is undeniably evident. Now, that we may proceed, what can self-essentiate, underived power, wisdom, goodness, be, but most perfect power, wisdom, goodness'? Or such, as than which there can never be more perfect '! For since there can be no wisdom, power, or goodness, which is not either original and self-essentiate, or derived and participated from thence; who sees not that the former must be the more perfect? Yea, and that it comprehends all the other (as what was from it) in itself, and consequently that it is simply the most perfect 1 And the reason will be the same, con- cerning any other perfection, the stamps and characters whereof we find signed upon the creatures. But that the being unto which these belong is absolutely and universally perfect in every kind, must be further evi- denced by considering more at large the notion and import of such a self-originate necessary being. Some indeed, both more anciently, ^^ and of late, have inverted this course; and from the supposition of absolute perfection, have gone about to infer necessity of existence, as being contained in the idea of the former. But of this latter we are otherwise assured upon clearer and less ex- ceptionable terms. And being so, are to consider what improvement may be made of it to our present purpose. And in the general, this seems manifestly imported in the notion of the necessary being we have already evinced, that it have in it (some way or other, in what way there will be occasion to consider hereafter) the entire sum and utmost fulness of being, beyond which or without the compass whereof no perfection is conceivable, or indeed (whjch is of the same import) nothing. Let it be observed, that we pretend not to argue this from the bare terms necessary being only, but from hence, that it is such as we have found it ; though indeed these very terms import not a little to this purpose. For that which is necessarily of itself, without being beholden to any thing, seems as good as all things, and to contain in itself an immense fulness, being indigent of nothing. Nor by indigence is here meant cravingness, or a sense of want only; in opposition whereto, every good and virtuous man hath or may attain a sort of durapicEia or self-fulness, and be satisfied from himself: (which yet is a stamp of di- vinity, and a part of the image of God, or such a partici- pation of the divine nature, as is agreeable to the state and condition of a creature:) but we understand by it (what is naturally before that) want itself really, and not in opinion, as the covetous is said to be poor. On the other hand, we here intend not a merely rational, (much less an imaginary,) but a real self-fulness. And so we say, what is of that nature, that it is, and subsists wholly and only of itself, without depending on any other, must owe this absoluteness to so peculiar an excellency of its own nature, as we cannot well conceive to be less than whereby it comprehends in itself the most boundless and unlimited fulness of being, lile, power, or whatsoever can be con- ceived under the name of a perfection. For taking notice of the existence of any thing whatsoever, some reason must be assignable, whence it is that this particular being doth exist, and hath such and such powers and properties be- longing to it, as do occur to our notice therein. When we can now resolve its existence into some cause that put it into being, and made it what it is, we cease so much to admire the thing, how excellent soever it be, and turn our admiration upon its cause, concluding that to have all the perfection in it which we discern in the effect, whatsoever unknown perfection (which we may suppose is very great) it may have besides. And upon this ground we are led, when we behold the manifold excellences that lie dispersed among particular beings in this universe, with the glory of the whole resulting thence, to resolve their existence into a So that wliatevor there is of strcnsth in that way of arcuing, the ?Ioiy of it cannot be without injury appropriated to tlie present age. much les-s to any particular person therein: it havine, since Anselni, been ventilated by divprs otMera heretofore. D. Sect. disf. 2. Q. 2. Th. Aquin. P. 1. Q. 2. a common cause, which we design by the name of God. And now considering him as a wise Agent, (which hath been proved,) and consequent!}' a free one, that acted not from any necessity of nature, but his mere good pleasure herein, we will not only conclude him to have all that perfection and excellency in him which we fmd him to have displaj-ed in so vast and glorious a work, but will readily believe him (supposing we have admitted a con- viction concerning what hath been discoursed before) to have a most inconceivable treasure of hidden excellency and perfection in him, that is not represented to our view in this work of his: and account, that he who could do all this which we see is done, coidd do unspeakably more. For though, speaking of natural and necessitated agents, which always act to their uttermost, it would be absurd to argue from their having done some lesser thing, to their power of doing somewhat that is much greater; yet as to free agents, that can choose their own act, and guide them- selves by wisdom and judgment therein, the matter is not so. As when some great prince bestows a rich largess upon some mean person, especially that deserved nothing from him, or was recommended by nothing to his royal favour, besides his poverty and misery; we justly take it for a very significant demonstration of that princely mu- nificence and bounty, which would incline him to do much greater things, when he should see a proportionable cause. But now, if taking notice of the excellences that appear in created beings, and inquiring how they come to exist and be what they are, we resolve all into their cause; which, considering as perfecth' free and arbitrary in all his communications, we do thence rationally conclude, that if he had thought fit, he could have made a much more pompous display of himself; and that there is in him, besides what appears, a vast and most abimdant store of undiscovered perfection. When next we turn our inquirj' and contemplation more entirely upon the cause, and bethink ourselves. But how came he to exist and be what he isl Finding this cannot be refunded upon any superior cause; and our utmost inquiry can admit of no other result but this, that he is of himself what he is, we will surely say then. He is all in all. And that perfection which before we judged vastly great, we will now conclude altogether absolute, and such beyond which no greater can be thought. Adding, I say, to what pre-conceptions we had of his greatness, from the works which we see have been done by him, (for why should we lose any ground we might have esteemed ourselves to have gained before'?) the con- sideration of his necessary self-subsistence : and that no other reason is assignable of his being what he is, but the peculiar and incommunicable excellency of his own na- ture ; whereby he was not only able to make such a world, but did possess eternally and invariably in himself all that he is, and hath : we cannot conceive that all to be less than absolutely universal, and comprehensive of whatsoever can lie within the whole compass of being. For when we find that among all other beings, (which is most certainly true not only of actual, but all possible beings also,) how perfect soever they are or may be in their own kinds, none of them, nor all of them together, are or ever can be of that perfection, as to he of themselves with- out dependence on somewhat else as their productive, yea and sustaining, cause; we see besides, that their cause hath all the perfection, soiue way, in it that is to be found in them all : there is also that appropriate perfection be- longing thereto, that it could be ; and eternally is (j-ea and could not but be) only of itself, by the underiveti and in- communicable excellency of its own being. And surely, what includes in it all the perfection of all actual and pos- sible beings, besides its own, (for there is nothing pos.■^ible which some cause, yea and even this, cannot produce,) and inconceivably more, must needs he absohiiely and every way perfect. Of all which perfections this is the radical oiie, that belongs to this common Cause and Author of all things, that he is necessarily and only self-subsisting. art. 1. contra Gentil. 1. I. c. 10. Bradwardin. 1. 1. c. 1. And by divers of late, as is snlfiricntly known, some rriecting, others much connduie in iU botli ofthe.se former, oud of iiioderii writers. 33 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 1. For if this high prerogative in point of being had been wanting, nothing at all had ever been. Therefore we at- tribute to God the greatest thing that can be said or thought, (and not what is wholly diverse from all other perfection, but which contains all others in it,) when we affirm of him that he is necessarily of himself For though when we have bewildered and lost ourselves (as we soon may) in the contemplation of this amazing subject, we readily indulge our wearied minds the ease and liberty of resolving this high excellency of self or necessary existence into a mere negation, and say that we mean by it nothing- else than that he was not from ano'her; yet surely, if we would take some pains with ourselves, and keep our slothful shifting thoughts to some exercise in this matter, though we can never comprehend that vast fulness of per- fection which is imported in it, (for it were not what we plead for, if we could comprehend it,) yet we should soon see and confess that it contains unspeakably more than a negation, even some great thing that is so much beyond our thoughts, that we shall reckon we have said but a little in saying we cannot conceive it. And when we have stretched our understandings to the utmost of their line and measure, though we may suppose ourselves to have conceived a great deal, there is infmitely more that we conceive not. Wherefore that is asober and most important truth which is occasionally drawn forth (as is supposed) from the so admired Des Cartes bj' the urgent objections of his very acute, friendly adversary, b that the inexhaustible power of God is the reason for which he needed no cause ; and that since that imexhausted power, or the immensity of his es- sence, is most highly positive, therefore he may be said to be of himself positively, i. e. not as if he did ever by any positive efficiency cause himself (which is most manifestly impossible) but that the positive excellency of his own being was such, as could never need, nor admit of, being caused. And that seems highly rational, (which is so largely in- sisted on by Doctor Jackson, >= and divers others,) that what is without cause must also be without limit of being; be- cause all limitation proceeds from the cause of a thing, which imparted to it so much and no more ; which argu- ment, though it seems neglected by Des Cartes, and is opposed by his antagonist; yet I cannot but judge that the longer one meditates, the less he shall understand, how any thing can be limited ad intra, or from itself, &c. As the author of the Tentam. Phys. Theol. .speaks. But that we may entertain ourselves with some more particular considerations of this necessary being, which may evince that general assertion of its absolute plenitude or fulness of e-ssence : it appears to be such, III. As is first, at the greatest imaginable distance from non-entity. For what can be at a greater, than that which is necessarily, which signifies as much as whereto not to be is utterly impossible 1 Now an utter impossibility not to be, or the uttermost distance from iio being, seems plainly to imply the absolute plenitude oi all being. And, if here it be said that to be necessarily and of itself needs be understood to import no more than a firm possession of that being which a thing hath, be it never so scant or mi- nute a portion of being; I answer, it seems indeed so, if we measure the signification of this expression by its first and more obvious appearance. But if you consider the matter more narrowly, you will find here is also signified the nature and kind of the being possessed, as well as the manner of possession, viz. that it is a being of so excellent and noble a kind, as that it can subsist alone without being beholden : which is so great an excellency, as that it man- ifestly comprehends all other, or is the foundation of all ihat can be conceived besides. Which, they that fondly dream of necessary matter, not considering, unwaringly make one single atom a more excellent thing than the whole frame of heaven and earth : tlud being supposed simply necessary, this the merest piece of hap-hazard, the strangest chance imaginable, and beyond what any but themselves could ever have imagined. And which, being considered, would give us to understand that no minute or finite being can be necessarily. b Ad ob. in Med. re§p. quarts. And hence we may see what it is to be nearer, or at a further distance from not-being. For these things that came contingently into being, or at the pleasure of a free cause, have all but a finite and limited being, whereof some, having a smaller portion of being than others, approach so much the nearer to not-being. Proportionably, what hath its being necessarily and of itself, is at the furthest distance from no-being, as compre- hending all being in itself Or, to borrow the expressions of an elegant writer, translated into our own language,d "We have much more non-essence than essence; if we have the essence of a man, yet not of the heavens, or of angels." "We are confined and limited within a parti- cular essence, but God, who is what he is, comprehendeth all possible essences." Nor is this precariously spoken, or as what may be hoped to be granted upon courtesy. But let the matter be rigidly examined and discussed, and the certain truth of it will most evidently appear. For if any thing be, in this sense, remoter than other from no-being, it must either be, what is necessarily of itself, or what is contingently at the plea- sure of the other. But since nothing is, besides that self- originate necessary being, but what was from it ; and no- thing from it but what was within its productive power ; it is plain all that, with its own being, was contained in it. And therefore, even in that sense, it is at the greatest dis- tance from no-being; as comprehending the utmost fulness of being in itself, and consequently absolute perfection. Which will yet further appear, in what follows. We there- fore add, IV. That necessary being is most unmixed or purest being, without allay. That is pure which is full of itself. Purity is not here meant in a corporeal sense, (which few will think,) nor in the moral ; but as, with metaphysicians, it signifies simplicity of essence. And in its present use is more especially intended to signify that simplicity which is opposed to the composition of act and possibility. We say then, that necessary being imports purest actuality ; which is the ultimate and highest perfection of being. For it signifies no remaining possibility, yet unreplete or not filled up, and consequently the fullest exuberancy and en- tire confluence of all being, as in its fountain and original source. We need not here look further to evince this, than the native import of the very terms themselves; ne- cessity and possibilHy ; the latter whereof is not so fitly said to be excluded the former, as contingency is, but to be swallowed up of it; as fulness takes up all the space which were otherwise nothing but vacuity or emptiness. It is plain then that necessary being engrosses all possible being, both that is, and (for the same reason) that ever was so. For nothing can be, or ever was, in possibility to come into being, but what either must spring, or hath sprung, from the necessary self-subsisting being. So that unto all that vast possibility, a proportionable actuality of this being must be understood to correspond. Else the other were not possible. For nothing is possible to be produced which is not within the actual productive power of the necessary being: I say -within its actual pro- ductive power; for if its power for such production were not already actual, it could never become so, and so were none at all : inasmuch as necessary being can never alter, and consequently can never come actually to be what it already is not; upon which account it is truly said, In ecternis posse el esse sunt idem. Wherefore in it, is nothing else but pure actuality, as profound and vast as is the ut- most possibility of all created or producible being; i. e. it can be nothing other than it is, but can do all things, of which more hereafter. It therefore stands opposed, not only, more directly, to impossibility of being, which is the most proper notion of no-being, but some way, even to possibility also. That is, the possibility of being any thing but what it is; as being every way complete and perfectly full already. V. Again, we might further add, that it is the most ab- stracted being, or is being in the very abstract. A thing much insisted on by some of the schoolmen. And the notion which with much obscurity they pursue after their manner, may carry some such sense as this, (if it may, c Of the Essence and Attributes of God. d Camin. Chap. IV. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 33 throughout, be called sense,) that whereas no created na- ture is capable of any other than mere mental abstraction, but exists al\va3's in concretion with some subject, that, be it never so refined, is grosser and less perfect than itself; so that we can distinguish the mentally abstracted essence, and (he thing which hath that essence ; by which concre- tion, essence is limited, and is only the particular essence of this or that thing, which hath or possesses that essence. The necessary being is, in strict propriety, not so truly said to have essence, as to be it, and exist separately by itself; not as limited to this or that thing. Whence it is, in itself, universal essence, containing therefore, not for- malh^ but eminently, the being of all things in perfect simplicity. Whence all its own attributes are capable of being atfirmed of it in the abstract, >= that it is wisdom, power, goodness; and not only hath these, and that upon this accoimt it is a being, which is necessarily and of itself. For that which is necessarily and of itself, is not whatso- ever it is by the accession of any thing to itself, whereof necessary being is incapable; but by its own simple and unvariable essence. Other being is upon such terras powerful, wise, yea, and existent, as that it maj^ cease to be so. Whereas to necessary being, it is manifestly repug- nant, and impossible either simply not to be, or to be any thing else but what and as it is. And though other things may have properties belonging to their essence not separa- ble from it, 3^et they are not their very essence itself. And, whereas they are in a possibility to lose their very exist- ence, the knot and ligament of whatsoever is most intimate to their actual being, all then falls from them together. Here, essence, properties, and existence, are all one simple thing that can never cease, decay, or change, because the whole being is necessary. Now, all this being supposed, of the ibrce of that form of speech, when we afhrm any thing in the abstract of another, we may admit the common sense of men to be the interpreter. For every body can tell, though they do not know the meaning of the word abstract, what we intend when we use that phrase or manner of speaking. As when we say, by way of hyper- bolical commendation. Such a man is not only learned, but learning itself; or he not only hath much of virtue, justice, and goodness in him, but he is virtue, justice, and goodness itself, (as was once said of an excellent pagan virtuoso, that I may borrow leave to use that word in the moral sense,) every one knows the phrase intends the ap- propriating all learning, virtue, justice, goodness, to such a one. Which, because they know unappropriable to any man, they easily understand it to be, in such a case, a rhetorical strain and form of speech. And yet could not know that, if also they did not understand its proper and native import. An.d so it may as well be understood what is meant by saying of God, He is being itself. With which sense may be reconciled that of (the so named) Dionysius the Areopagite ;f that God is not so properly said to be of, or be in, or to have, or partake, of being, as that it is of him, &c. Inasmuch as he is the pre-existent Being to all being ; i. e. if we understand him to mean all besides his own. In which sen.se taking being for that which is communicated and imparted, he may truly be said, (as this author and the Platonists generally speak,?) to be super-essential or super-substantial. But how fitly being is taken in that restrained sense, we may say more hereafter. In the meantime, what hath been said concerning this abstractedness of the necessary being, hath in it somethings so unintelligible, and is accompanied with so great (un- mentioned) difficulties, (which it would give us, perhaps, more labour than profit to discuss,) and the absolute per- fection of God appears so evidenceable otherwise, by what halh been and may be further said, that we are no way concerned to lay the stress of the cause on this matter only. VI. Moreover, necessary being is the cause and author of all being besides. Whatsoever is not necessary, is caused ; for not having being of itself, it must be put into e To which purpose we may take notice of the words of one. not the less wortliv to hr nnmril, for not being reckoned of tliat fore-menlioned order. Si eiiim denominative de co qciippiam praedicaretur. abstractum esset turn aUud ah if'SO, turn ipso prius. Q,nod .sane impinni est. oimre neqiie ens est sed es- sentia, ncqiie bonui sed bonitits est. Jul. Scr.l Exen: 365 i Kai avTO oe to ctnai ck tov npoovros, xai tiVTOv earc ie to stvat, nat ovk being by somewhat else. And ma.smuch as there is no middle sort of being betwixt necessor}' and not necessary, and all that is not necessary is caused, it is plain that which is necessary must be the cause of all the rest. And surely what is the cause of all being besides its own, must needs, one way or other, contain its own and all other in itself, and is consequently comprehensive of the utmost fulness of being ; or is the absolutely perfect being, (as must equally be acknowledged,) unless any one would imagine himself to have got the notice of some perfection that lies without the compass of all being. Nor is it an exception worth the mentioning, that there may be a conception of possible being or perfection, which the necessary being hath not caused. For it is, manifesilj'', as well the possible cause of all possible being and per- fection, as the actual cause of what is actual. And what it is possible to it to produce, it hath within its productive power, as hath been said before. And if the matter did require it, we might say further, that the same necessary being which hath been the pro- ductive cause, is also the continual root and basis of all being, which is not necessary. For what is of itself, and cannot, by the special privilege of its own being, but be, needs nothing to sustain it, or needs not trust to any thing besides its own eternal stability. But what is not so, seems to need a continual reproduction everj' moment, and to be no more capable of continuing in being by itself, than it was, by itself, of coming into being. For (as is frequently alleged by that so often mentioned author) since there is no connexion betwixt the present and future time, but what is easily capable of rupture, it is no way conse- quent that, because I am now, I shall therefore be the next moment, further than as the free Author of my being shall be pleased to continue his own most arbilrar)' in- fluence, for m}'' support. This seems highly probable to be true, whether that reason signif}^ any thing or nothing. And that thence, also, continual conservation differs not from creation. Which, whether (as is said by the same author) it be one of the things that are manifest by natural light, or whether a positive act be needless to the annihi- lation of created things, but only the withholding of in- fluence, let them examine that apprehend the cause to need it. And if, upon inquiry, they judge it at lea«t evidenceable by natural light to be so, (as I doubt not they will.) they will have this further ground upon which thus to reason : that, inasmuch as the necessary being subsists wholly by itself, and is that whereon all other doth totally depend, it hereupon follows, that it mu.st, some way, contain in itself all being. We may yet fur- ther add. That the necessary being we have evinced, though it have caused and do continually sustain all things, yet doth not itself in the meantime suffer any diminution. It is not possible, nor consistent with the very terms ne- cessary being, that it can. It is true, that if such a thing as a necessary atom were admitted, that would be also undiminishable, it were not else an atom. But as nothing then can flow from it, as from a perfect parvitude nothing can, so it can effect nothing. And the reason is the same of manj' as of one. Nor would undiminishableness, upon such terms, signify any thing to the magnif\-ing the value of such a trifle. But this is none of the present case : for our eyes tell us here is a world in being, which we are sure is not itself necessarily; and was therefore made by him that is. And that, without mutation or change in him ; against which the very notion of a necessary being is most irreconcilably reluctant ; and therefore without diminution, which can- not be conceived without change. h Wherefore how inexhaustible a fountain of life, being, and all perfection, have we here representedioourthoughts ! from whence this vast universe is sprnn?, and iscontintially springing, and that in the meantime receiving no recruits or foreign supplies, yet suffers no impairment or lessening of itself! What is this but absolute all-fulness 1 And it is avToi rnv firat, Ka( cv avrtoi errrt to ctvai, xai ovk aVTO( tv rtot tivai, «raj arrnv rvfi rn firm. >cai ovk ai'To; ?\rf to eivai. De Dirinis nomin. Co. S. e Proclus in Plat. Theol. 1. 2. c 4. It E" r'c -ravTni nit \Ofi£iii, KaOopa. Trriyrjv fin- ^(.ii;f, ti?) j/v ce ►of, ap\r]v oiTos. ayal^ov a(Ttay plt^ap \l'V\ri(; ovk « xto/uycMni air' avTOV eir' (KCO'Coy e\aTTOvvTO)i: Plotinm Enn. 6. 1. 9. C. 9. 34 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part L so far from arguing any deficiency or mutability in his nature, that there is this continual issue of power and virtue from him, that it demonstrates its high excellency that this can be without decay or mutation. For of all this, we are as certain as we can be of any thing : that many things are not necessarily, that the being must be necessary from whence all things else proceed, and that with necessary being change is inconsistent. It is therefore unreasonable to entertain any doubt that things are so, which most evidently appear to be so, only because it is beyond our measure and compass to apprehend how they are so. And it would be to doubt, against our own eyes, whether there he any such thing as motion in the world, or composition of bodies, because we cannot give a clear account, so as to avoid all difficulties, and the entanglement of the common sophisms about them, how these things are performed. In the present case, we have no difficulty but what is to be resolved into the perfection of the divine nature, and the imperfection of our own. And how easily conceivable is it, that somewhat may be more perfect, than that we can conceive it. If we cannot conceive the manner of God's causation of things, or the nature of his causa- tive influence, it only shows their high excellency, and gives us the more ground (since this is that into which both his own revelation and the reason of things most naturally lead us to resolve all) to admire the mighty efficacy of his all-creating and all-sustaining will and word ; that in that easy unexpensive way, by his mere fiat, so great tViings should be performed. VII. We only say further, that this necessary Being is such to which nothing can be added ; so as that it should be really greater, or better, or more perfect, than it was before. And this not only .signifies, that nothing can be joined to it, so as to become a part of it, (which necessary being, by its natural immutability, manifestly refuses,) but we also intend by it, that all things else, with it, contain not more of real perfection than it doth alone. Which, though it carries a difficulty with it that we intend not wholly to overlook when it shall be seasonable to consider it, is a most apparent and demonstrable truth. For it is plain that all being and perfection which is not necessary, proceeds from that which is, as the cause of it ; and that no cause could communicate any thing to another Avhich it had not, some way, in it.self Wherefore it is manifestly consequent that all other being was wholly before com- prehended in that which is necessary, as having been wholly produced by it. And what is wholly comprehended of another, i. e. within its productive power, before it be produced, can be no real addition to it, when it is. Now what can be supposed to import fulness of being and perfection, more than this impossibility of addition, or that there can be nothing greater or more perfect"? And now these considerations are mentioned, without solicitude whether tliey be so many exactly distinct heads. For admit that they be not all distinct, but some are in- volved with others of them, yet the same truth may more powerfully strike some understandings in one form of re- presentation, others in another. And it suffices, that (though not severally) they do together plainly evidence that the necessary being includes the absolute, entire ful- ness, of all being and perfection actual and possible within itself Having therefore thus despatched that former part of this undertaking, the eviction of an every-way perfect being, we shall now need to labour little in the other, viz. VIII. Secondly, The more express deduction of the in- finifeness and onliness thereof. For as to the former of these, it is in effect the same thing that hath been already proved ; since to the fullest notion of infiniteness, absolute perfection seems every way most fully to correspond. For absolute perfection includes all conceivable perfection, leaves nothing excluded. And what doth most simple infiniteness import, but to have nothing for a boundary, or, which is the same, not to be bounded at all 1 We intend not now, principally, infiniteness extrinsi- cally considered, with respect to time and place, as to be eternal and immense do import ; but inlrinsically, as im- porting bottomless profundity of essence, and the full con- fluence of all kinds and degrees of perfection, without bound or limit. This is the same with absolute perfec- tion : which yet, if any should suspect not to be so, they might, however, easily and expressly prove it of the neces- sary being, upon the same grounds that have been already allegedfbrproof of that: — as that the necessary being hath actuality answerable to the utmost possibility of the crea- ture; that it is the only root and cause of all other being, the actual cause of whatsoever is actually •, the possible cause of whatsoever is possible to be: which is most ap- parently true, and hath been evidenced to be so, by what hath been said, so lately, as that it needs not be repeated. That is, in short, that nothing that is not necessarily, and of itself, could ever have been or can be, but as it hath been or shall be put into being by that which is necessa- rily, and of itself So that this is as apparent as that any thing is, or can be. But now let sober reason judge, whether there can be any bounds or limits set to the possibility of producible being; either in respect of kinds, numbers, or degrees of perfection 1 Who can say or think, when there can be so many sorts oi" creatures produced, (or at least individuals of those sorts,) that there can be no morel Or that any creature is so perfect as that none can be made more per- fect 1 Which indeed, to suppose, were to suppose an actual infiniteness in the creature. And then it being, however, still but somewhat that is created or made, how can ilp; maker but be infinite'? For surely nobody will be so ab- surd as to imagine an infinite effect of a finite cause. Either therefore the creature is, or some time may be actually made, so perfect that it cannot be more perfect, or not. If not, we have our purpose ; that there is an infinite possibility on the part of the creature, always unreplete; and consequently, a proportionable infinite actuality of power on the Creator's part. Infinite power, I say; other- wise there were not that acknowledged infinite possibility of producible being. For nothing is producible that no power can produce, be the intrinsic possibility of it (or its not-implying in itself a contradiction that it should exist) what it will. And I say, infinite actual power, because the Creator, being what he is necessarily, what power he hath not actually, he can never have, as was argued before. But if it be said, the creature either is, or may some time be, actually so perfect as that it cannot be more perfect; that, as was said, will suppose it then actually infinite ; and therefore much more that its cause is so. And there- fore in this way our present purpose woirld be gained also. But we have no mind to gain it this latter way, as we have no need. It is in itself plain, to any one that considers, that this possibility on the creature's part can never actu- ally be filled up; that it is a bottomless abyss, in which our thoughts may still gradually go down deeper and deeper, without end: that is, that still more might be pro- duced, or more perfect creatures, and still more, everlast- ingly, without any bound; which sufficiently infers what we aim at, that the Creator's actual power is proportion- able. And indeed the supposition of the former can neither consist with the Creator's perfection, nor with the imper- fection of the creature; it would infer that the Creator's productive power might be exhausted ; that he could do no more, and so place an actual boundary to him, and make him finite. It were to make the creature actually full of being, that it could receive no more, and so would make that infinite. But it may be said, siirce all power is in order to act, and the very notion of possibility imports that such a thing, of which it is said, may, some time, be actual ; it seems very unreasonable to say, that the infinite power of a cause cannot produce an infinite effect; or that infinite possibility can never become infinite actuality. For that were to say and imsay the same thing, of the same; to affirm omnipotency and impotency of the same cause ; possibility and impossibility of the same effect. How urgent soever this difficulty may seem, there needs nothing but patience and attentive consideration to disen- tangle ourselves and get through it. For if we will but allow ourselves the leisure to consider, we shall find that power and possibility must here be taken not simply and abstractedly, but as each of them is in conjunction with infinite. And what is infinite, but that which can never be travelled through, or whereof no end can he ever arrived unto? Now suppo.se infinite power had produced all that ClIAP. IV. THE LIVING TEMPLE. J5 it could produce, it were no longer infinite, there were an and of it : i. e. it had found limits and a boundary beyond which it could not go. If infinite possibility were filled up, there were an end of that also ; and so neither were infinite. It may then be further urged, that there is therefore no such thing as infinite power or possibility. For how is that cause said to have infinite power, which can never pioduce its proportionable etlect, orthat eflfect have infinite possibility, which can never be produced 1 It would follow then, that power and possibility, which are said to be in- finite, are neither power nor possibility ; and that infinite must be rejected as a notion either repugnant to itself, or to any thing unto which we shall go about to affix it. I answer. It only follows, they are neither power nor possibility, whereof there is any bound or end; or that can ever be gone through. And how absurd is it that they shall be said, as they cannot but be, to be both very vast, if they were finite ; and none at all, for no other reason but their being infinite ! And for the pretended repugnancy of the very notion of infinite, it is plain, that though it can- not be to us distinctly comprehensible, yet it is no more repugnant than the notion of finiteness. Nor when we have conceived of power, in the general, and in our own thoughts set boimds to it, and made it finite, is it a greater difficulty (nay, they that try will find it much easier) again to think away these bounds, and make it infinite 1 And let them that judge the notion of infiniteness incon- sistent, therefore reject it if they can. They will feel it reimposing itself upon them, whether they will or no, and It' sticking as close to their minds as their very thinking power itself And who was therefore ever heard of, that did not acknowledge some or other infinite 1 Even the Epicure- ans themselves, though they confined their gods, they did not the universe. Which, also, though some Peripatetic atheists made finite in respect of place, yet in duration they made it infinite. Though the notion of an eternal world is encumbered with such absurdities and impossi- bilities, as whereof there is not the least shadow, in that, of an every way infinite Deit}^ Briefly, it consists not with the nature of a contingent being, to be infinite. For what is upon such terms, only, in being, is reducible to nothing, at the will and pleasure of its maker; but it is a manifest repugnancy, that what is at the utmost distance from nothing (as infinite fulness of being cannot but be) should be reducible thither. Therefore actual infinity cannot but be the peculiar privi- lege of that which is necessarily. Yet may we not say, that it is not within the compass of infinite power to make a creature that may be infinite. For it argues not want of power that this is never to be done, but a still infinitely abounding surplusage of it, that can never be drained or drawn diy. Nor, that the thing it.self is simply impossible. It may be, as is compendiously expressed by that most succinct and polite writer. Dr. Boyle, i in fieri, not in facto esse. That is, it might be a thing always in, doing, but never done. Because it belongs to the infinite perfection of God, that his power be never actually exhausted ; and to the infinite imperfection of the creature, that its possibility or capacity be never filled up: to the necessary self-subsisting being, to be always full and communicative; to the communicated contingent be- ing, to be ever emptj^ and craving. One maj' be said to have that, some way, in his power, not only which he can do presently, all at once, but which he can do by degrees, and supposing he have sufficient time. So a man may be reckoned able to do that, as the uttermost, adequate etlect of his whole power, which it is only possible to him to have effected, with the expiration of his life's-time. God's measure is eternit)^ What if we say then, this is a work possible to be accomplished, even as the ultimate, propor- tionable issue of divine power, (if it were his will, upon which all contingent being depends,) that the creature should be ever growing in the mean while, and be abso- lutely perfect at the expiration of eternity'? If then you be good at suppositions, suppose that expired, and this work finished, both together. Wherefore if you ask. Why can the work of making created being infinite, never be done 1 The answer will be, Because eternity (in every imaginable instant whereof, the inexhaustible power of God can, if he will, be still adding either more creatures, or more perfection to a creature) can never be at an end. We might further argue the infinity of the necessaiy being, from what hath been said of its undiminiskaileness, by all its vast communications. Its impossibilityk to re- ceive any accession to itself, by any its so great productions, both which are plainly demonstrable, as we have seen, of the necessary being, even as it is such, and do clearly, as any thing can, bespeak infinity. But we have thence ar- gued its absolute perl'ection, which so evidently includes the same thing;, that all this latter labour might have been spared; were it not that it is the genius of some persons not to be content that they have the substance of a thing said, unless it be also said in tlieir o^Ti terms. And that the express asserting of God's simple infiniteness, in those very terms, is, in that respect, the more requisite, as it is a form of expression more known and usual. IX. There are yet some remaining difficulties in the matter we have been discoursing of; which partly through the debility of our own minds we cannot but find, and which partly the subtilty of sophistical wits doth create to us. It will be requisite we have some consideration of at least some of them, which we will labour to despatch with all possible brevity ; leaving those that delight in the .sport of tying and loosing knots, or of weaving snares wherein cunningly to entangle themselves, to be entertained by the school-men; among whom they may find enough, upon this subject, to give them exercise unto weariness ; and, if their minds have any relish of what is more savorj', I may venture to say, unto loathing. It may possibly be here said, in short, But what have we all this while been doing? We have been labouring to prove that necessary being comprehends the absolute fulness of all being : and what doth this signify, but that all being is necessary 1 That God is all things, and so that every thing is God ; that we hereby confoimd the be- ing of a man, yea, of a stone, or whatever we can think of, with one another, and all with the being of God. And again, how is it possible there should be an infinite self-subsisting being? For then how can there be any finite, since such infinite being includes all being, and there can be nothing beyond all 1 Here therefore it is requisite, having hitherto only as- serted, and endeavoured to evince that, some way, neces- sary being doth include all being, to show in what way. And it is plain it doth not include all, in the same way. It doth not so include that which is created by it, arid depends on it, as it doth its own, which is uncreated and independent. The one it includes as its own, or rather as itself; tn* other, as what it is, and ever was, within its power to pro- duce. If any better like the terms fo)malhj and virtually, they nviy serve themselves of them at their own pleasure, which yet, as to many, will but more darkly speak the same sense. AVe must here know, the productive power of God ter- minates not upon himself as if he were, by it, capable of adding any thing to his own appropriate being, which is (as hath been evinced already) infinitely full, and incapa- ble of addition, and is therefore all pure act ; but on the creature, where there is still a perpetual possibility, never filled up ; because divine power can never be exhausted. And thus all that of being is virtually in him, which, either having produced, he doth totally sustain, or not being pro- duced, he can produce. Whereupon it is easy to understand, how necessary being may comprehend all being, and yet all being not be necessary. It comprehends all being, besides what itself is, as having had, within the compass of its productive p<^)\ver, whatsoever hath actually sprung from it, and having within tlie conipa,ss of the same power, whatsoever is still possible to be produced. Which no more confounds such produced or producible being with that necessary being which is its cause, than it confounds all the effects of hu- man poM-er with one another, and with the being of a man, to say, that he virtually comprehended them (so far as they I Now Bishop of Clogtier, in liis Contemplat Metaphva. tiolhing added to it ; vet it is without dispute, that whatsoever is so full as that K For ha\vsoevcr Qi.ir]p translumialion. If these are ne- cessar)', is it needfid they be universal? frequent? If not, more rare thinga of tliis sort not wanting, 'i. Demand. Can subject.^, remote from their prince, sufficiently be assiucd of liis e.xistfcnce? 3. Demand. Can we be sure there are men on earth 3 I. And if any should in the meantime still remain either doubtful, or apt to cavil, after all that hath been said for proof of that bcirig's existence which we have described, I would only add these few things, by way of inquir}- or demand: viz. First, Do they believe, upon supposition of the exist- ence of such a Being, that it is possible it may be made knowTi to us, in our present state and circumstances, by means not unsuitable thereto, or inconvenient to the order and government of the world, that it doth exist"? It were strange to say or suppose, that a Being of so high perfec- tion as this we have hitherto given an accoimt of, if he is, cannot in any fit way make it known that he is, to an in- telligent and apprehensive sort of creatures. If indeed he is, and be the common Cause, Author, and Lord of us and all things, (which we do now but sup- pose: and we may defy cavil to allege any thing that is so much as colourable against the possibility of the sup- position,) surely he hath done greater things than the mak- ing of it known that he is. It is no unapprehensible thing. There hath been no inconsistent notion hitherto given of him; nothing said concerning him, but will well admit that it is possible such a Being may be now existent. Yea, we not only can conceive, but we actually have, and cannot but have, some conception of the several attributes we have ascribed to him: so as to apply them, severally, to somewhat else, if we will not apply them, jointly, to him. We cannot but admit there is some eternal, neces- sary being; somewhat that is of it.self active; somewhat that is powerful, wise, and good. And these notions have in them no repugnancy to one another; wherefore it is not impossible they may meet, and agree together, in full per- fection to one and the same existent beinsf. And hence it is manifestly no unapprehensible thing, that such a Being doth exist. Now supposing that it doth exist, and hath been to us the Cau.se and Author of our being; hath given us the reasonable, intelligent nature which we find our- selves possessors of; and that very power whereby we apprehend the existence of such a Being as he is to be pos- sible, (all which we for the present do still but suppose,) while also his actual existence is not unapprehensible; were it not the greatest madness imaginable to say, that if he do exist, he cannot also make our apprehensive nature understand this apprehensible thing that he doth exist 1 We will therefore take it for granted, and as a thing which no man well in his wits will deny, that upon supposition such a Being, the Cause and Author of all things, do exist, he might, in some convenient way or other, with sufficient evidence, make it known to such creatures as we, so as to beget in us a rational certainty that he doth exist. Upon which presumed ground we will only reason thus, or assume to it ; That there is no possible and fit way of doing it which is not liable to as much exception as the evidence we already have. Whence it will be consequent, that if the thing be possible to be fitly done, it is done already. That is, that if we can apprehend how it may he possible such a iBeing, actually existent, might give us that evidence of his existence that should be suitable to our present state, and suflicient to oiU-weigh all objections to the contrary; (without which it were not rationally suf- ficient;) and that we can apprehend no possible way of doing this, which will not be liable to the same, or equal objections, as mav be made against the present means we have for the begetting of this certainty in us, then we have already sufficient evidence of this Being's existence. That is, such as ought to prevail against all objections, and obtain our assent that it doth exist. Here it is only needful to be considered what ways can 2085': 38 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 1. be thoTiglit of, which we will say might assure us in this matter, that we already have not. And what might be objected agamst them, equally, as against the means we now have. II. Will we say such a Being, if he did actually exist, might ascertain us of his existence, by some fowerful iin- pression of that truth upon our minds? We will not insist what there is of this already. Let them consider,who gainsay what they can find of it in their own minds; and whether they are not engaged by their atheistical inclinations in a contention against themselves, and their more natural sen- timents, from which they find it a matter of no .small dif- ficulty to be delivered"? It was not for nothing, that even Epicurus himself calls this of an existing deity, a prolep- fical notion. But you may say, the impression might have been simply rmiversal, and so irresistible as to prevent or overbear all doubt, or inclination to doubt. And, first, for the universality of it, why may we not suppose it already sufficiently universal 7 as hath been heretofore alleged. With what confidence can the few dissenting atheists, that have professed to be of another persuasion, put that value upon themselves, as to reckon their dissent considerable enough to implead the univer- sality of this impression 1 Or what doth it signify more to that purpose, than some few instances may do, of persons so stupidly foolish, as to give much less discovery of any rational faculty than some beasts, to the impugning the universal rationality of mankind 1 Besides that, your contrary profession is no sufficient argument of your contrary persuasion, much less, that you never had any stamp or impression of a Deity upon your minds, or that you have quite rased it out. It is much to be suspected thai you hold not your contrary persuasion with that unshaken confidence, and freedom from all fear- ful and suspicious misgivings, as that you have much more reason to brag of your disbelief for the strength, than you have for the goodness, of it. And that you have those qualmish fits, which bewray the impression, (at least to your own notice and reflection, if you would but allow yourselves the liberty of so much converse with your- selves,) that you will not confess, and yet cannot utterly deface. But if in this you had quite won the day, and were masters of your design, were it not prettv to suppose that the common consent of mankind would be a good argument of the existence of a Deity, except only that it wants your concurrence! If it were". so universal as to in- clude your vote and suffrage, it would then be a firm and solid argument; (as no doubt it is, without you, a stronger one than you can answer;) but when you have made a hard shift to withdraw your assent, you have undone the Deity, and religion ! Doth this cause stand and fall with you, unto which you can contribute about as much as the fly to the triumph"? Was that true before, which now j^our hard-laboured dissent hath made false"? But if this impression were simply universal, so as also to include you, it matters not wha't men would say or object against it; (it is to be supposed thev would be in no disposition to object any thing;) but what were to be said, or what the case itself, objectively considered, would admit. And though it would not (as now it doth not) admit of any thing to be said to any purpose, yet the same thing were still to be said, that you now say. And if we shoiild but again unsuppose so much of the former supposition, as to imagine that some few should ha ve made their escape, and disburthened themselves of all apprehensions of God, would they not, with the same impudence as you now do, say that all religion were nothing else but ehthusiastical fanaticism; and that all mankind, besides themselves, were enslaved fools 1 And for the mere irresistibleness of this impression ; it is true, it would take away all disposition to oppose, but it may be presumed this is none of the rational evidence which we suppose you to mean ; when you admit (if you do admit) that, some way or other, the existence of such a being might be possibly made so evident, as to induce a rational certainty thereof For to believe such a thing to be true only upon a strong impulse, (how certain soever the thing be,) is not to assent to it upon a foregoing reason. Nor can any, in that case, tell why thev believe it, hxitthat they believe it. You will not sure think any thing the truer for this, only, that such and such believe it with a sturdy confidence. It is true, that the universality and naturalness of such a persuasion, as pointing us to a com- mon cause thereof, affords the matter of an argument, or is a medium not contemptible nor capable of answer, as hath been said before. But to be irresistibly captivated into an assent, is no medium at all; but an immediate per.suasion of the thing itself, without a reason. III. Therefore must it yet be demanded of atheistical persons, what means, that you yet have not, would you think sufficient to put this matter out of doubt 1 Will you say, some kind of very glorious apparitions, becoming the majesty of such a one as this Being is represented, would have satisfied"? But if you know how to fancy, that such a thing as the sun, and other luminaries, might have been compacted of a certain peculiar sort of atoms, coming to- gether of their own accord, without the direction of a wise agent; yea, and consist so long, and hold so strangely regular motions; how easy would it be to object that, with much advantage, again'Jst what any temporary apparition, be it as glorious as you can imagine, might seem to signify to this purpose I Would dread/id loud voices proclaiming him to be, of whose existence /ou doubt, have served the turnl It is likely, if your lear would have permitted you to use your wit, you would have had some subtle invention how, by some odd rencounter of angry atoms, the air or clouds might become thus terribly vocal. And when you know already, that they do sometimes salute your cars with very loud sounds, (as when it thunders,) there is little doubt but your great wit can devise a way how possibly such sounds might become articulate. And for the sense and coherent import of what were spoken ; you that are so good at conjecturing how things might casually happen, would not be long in making a guess that might serve that turn also ; except you were grown very dull and barren, and that fancy that served you to imagine how the whole frame of the universe, and the rare structure of the bodies of animals, yea, and even the reasonable soul itself, might be all casual productions, cannot now devise how, by chance, a few words (for you do not say you expect long orations) might fall out to be sense though there were no intelligent speaker. But would strange and wonderful effects that might sur- prise and amaze you do the business "? We may challenge you to try your faculty, and stretch it to the uttermost ; and then tell us what imagination you have formed of any thing more strange and wonderful, than the already extant frame of nature, in the whole, and the several parts of it. Will he that hath awhile considered the composition of the world ; the exact and orderly motions of the stm, moon, and stars; the fabric of his own body, and the powers of his soul, expect yet a wonder, to prove to him there is a God "? But if that be the complexion of your minds, that it is not the greatness of any work, but the novelty and surprisingriess of it, that will convince you, it is not ra- tional evidence you seek: nor is it your reason, but your idle curiosity, you would have gratified; which deserves no more satisfaction than that fond wish, that one might come from the dead to warn men on earth, lest they should come into the place of torment. And if such means as these that have been mentioned should be thought necessary, I would ask. Are they ne- cessarj'' to every individual person, so as that no man shall be esteemed to have had sufficient means of conviction, who hath not with his own eyes beheld some such glorious apparition ; or himself heard some such terrible voice ; or been the immediate witness or subject of some prodigious wonderful work? Or will the once seeing, hearing, or feel- ing them suflice? It is not necessary there .should be a frequent repetition and renewal of these amazing things, lest the impression wearing off, there be a relapse, and a gradual sliding into an oblivion, and unapprehensiveness of that Being's existence, whereof they had, sometime, received a conviction. Now if such a continual iteration of these strange things were thought necessary, would they not hereby soon cease to be strange "? And then if their strangeness was necessary, by that very thing, wherein their sufficiency for conviction is said to consist, they should become useless. Or if by their frequent variations Chap. V. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 39 (which it is possible to suppose) a perpetual amusement be still kept up in the minds of men, and they be always full of consternation and wonder, doth this temper so much befriend the exercise of reason, or contribute to the sober consideration of things? As if men could not be rational, without being half mad ! And indeed they might soon become altogether so, by being but awhile beset with objects so full of tenor, as are by this supposition made the necessary means to convince them of a Deity. ^ And were this a iit means of ruling the world, of preserving order among mankind? What business could then be followed? Who could attend the affairs of their callings? Who could either be capable of governing, or of being governed, while all men's minds should be wholly taken up, either in the amazed view or the suspenseful expec- tation, of nought else but strange things? To which pur- pose much hath been of late, with so excellent reason, discoursed by a noted author, b that it is needless here to say more. And the aspect and influence of this state of things would be most pernicious upon religion, that should be most served thereby, and which requires the greatest severity and most peaceful composure of mind to the due managing the exercises of it. How little would that con- tribute to pious and devout converses with God, that should certainly keep men's minds in a continual com- motion and hurry ! This course, as our present condition is, what could it do but craze men's understandings, as a too bright and dazzling light causeth blindness, or any over-excelling sensible object destroys the sense ; so that we should soon have cause to apply the Erpen. proverb, " Shut the windows that the house may be light." And might learn to put a sense, not intolerable, upon those passages of some mystical writers,'^ that God is to be seen, — in a divine cloud or darkiiess, as one;(i and with closed eyes'" as another, speaks; though what was their very sense I will not pretend to tell. Besides that, by this means, there would naturally ensue the continual excitation of so vexatious and enthralling passions, so servile and tormenting fears and amazements, as could not but hold the souls of men under a constant and comfortless restraint from any free and ingenuous ac- cess to God, or conversation with him; wherein the very life of religion consists. And then, to what purpose doth the discovery and acknowledgment of the Deity serve ? Inasmuch as it is never to be thought that the exist- ence of God is a thing to be known, only that it may be known; but that the end it serves for, is religion; a com- placential and cheerful adoration of him, and application of ourselves with at once both dutiful and pleasant affec- tions towards him. That were a strange means of coming to know that he is, that should only tend to destroy or hinder the very end itself of that knowledge. Wherefore all this being considered, it is likely it would not be in- sisted upon as necessary to our being persuaded of God's existence, that he should so multiply strange and astonish- ing things, as that every man might be a daily, amazed be- holder and witness of them. IV. And if their frequency and constant iteration be acknowledged not necessary, but shall indeed be judged wholly inconvenient, more rare discoveries of him, in the very ways we have been speaking of, have not been want- ing. What would we think of such an appearance of God as that was upon motmt Sinai, when he came dowTi (or caused a sensible glory to descend) in the sight of all that great people ; wherein the several things concurred that were above mentioned ? Let us but suppose such an ap- pearance, in all the concurrent circumstances of it, as that is said to have been. That is we will suppose an equally great assembly or multitude of people is gathered together, and solemn forewarning is given and proclaimed among them, by appointed heralds or officers of state, that, on such a prefixed day, now very nigh at hand, the divine majesty and glory (even his glory set in majesty) will visibly ap- pear, and show itself to them. They are most sev'erely enjoined to prepare themselves, and be in readiness against that day. Great care is taken to sanctify the people, and a Now were not that q most improper course, and unsuitable to the na- ture ot man, that stiould rather tend to destroy his reason or judgment, tlian convince it ? b Dr. Spencer, of Prodigies. A discourse, which, though it disproves not the place; bounds are set about the designed theatre of this great appearance : all are strictly required to observ^e their due and awful distances, and abstain from more au- dacious approaches and gazings ; lest that terrible glory break out upon them, and they perish : an irreverent or disrespectful look, they are told, will be mortal to them, or a very touch of any part of this sacred enclosure. In the morning of the appoinied day, there are thunders, and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the hallowed mount. The exceeding loud sound of trumpet proclaims the Lord's descent. He descends in fire, the flames whereof envelop the trembling mount, (now floored with a sapphire pave- ment, clear as the body of heaven,) and ascend into the middle region, or, as it is expressed, into the midst or heart of the heavens. The voice of words, (a loud and dreadful voice,) audible to all that mighty assembly, in which were six hundred thousand men, (probably more than a million of persons,) issues forth from amidst that terrible glory, pronouncing: to them that I am Jehovah thy God. And thence proceeding to give them precepts so plain and clear, so comprehensive and full, so unexccption- ably just and righteous, so agreeable to the nature of man, and subservient to his good, that nothing could be more worthy the great Creator, or more aplly suitable to such a sort of creatures. It is very likely, indeed, that such a demonstration would leave no spectator in doubt concerning the existence of God ; and would puzzle the philosophy of the most sceptical atheist to give an account, otherwise, of the phe- nomenon. And if such could devise to say any thing that should seem plausible to some very ea.sy half-witted per- sons, that were not present, they would have a hard task of it to quiet the minds of those that were ; or make them believe this was nothing else but some odd conjuncture of certain fiery atoms, that, by some strange accident hap- pened into this occursion and conflict with one another; or some illusion of fancy, by which so great a multitude were all at once imposed upon ; so as that they only seem- ed to them.selves to bear and see, what they heard and saw not. Nor is it likely they would be very confident of the truth of their own conjecture, or be apt to venture much upon it themselves; having been the eye and ear- witnesses of these things. But is it nccessarj- this course shall be taken to make the world know there is a God ? Such an appearance, in- deed, would more powerfully strike sense; but imto sober and considerate reason were it a greater thing than the making such a world a.s this, and the disposing this great variety of particular beings in it, into so exact and elegant an order ; and the sustaining and preserving it in the same state, through so many ages? Let the vast and unknown extent of the whole, the admirable variety, the elegant shapes, tlie regular motions, the excellent faculties and powers of that inconceivable number of creatures contained in it, be considered. And is there any comparison between that temporary, transient, occasional, and this steady, per- manent, and universal discover}^ of God ? Nor (supposing the truth of the history) can it be thought the design of this appearance lo these Hebrews was to convince them of the existence of a Deity, to be worshipped ; when both thej' had so convincing evidence thereof many ways before ; and the other nations, that which they left, and tho^e M'hither they went, were not without their religion and worship, such as it was : but to engage them, by so ma- jestic a representation thereof, to a more exact observance of his will, now made known. Though, had there been any doubt of the former, (as we can hardly suppose they could before have more doubted of the being of a God, than that there were men on earth.) this might collaterally, and besides its chief intention, be a means to confirm them concerning that also: but that it was necessary for that end, we have no pretence to imagine. The like may be said,concerningothermiraclesheretofore wrought, that the intent of them was to justily the divine authority of lym who wrought them, to prove him sent by God, and so countenance the doctrine or message delivered by him. the reality or tnio sifnificancy of such portents, yet aptly tends to prevent or correct the ill use of them. c D. Areop. 1. de niyster. Th«oI. c. 1. d Tif o OCtos yvotfios. e Prod, in Plat. Theol. jtvcavras eveipvcadai T>t a) yc^roji xai Kpxxpiut tuv onTiiiV cvadi. ■ ^ THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. Not that they tended (otherwise than on the by) to prove God's existence : much less, was this so amazing an ap- pearance needful, or intended for that end; and least of all, was it necessary that this should be God's ordinary way of making it known to men that he doth exist : so as that for this purpose he should often repeat so terrible representations of himself. And how inconvenient it were to mortal men, as well as unnecessary, the astonishment "wherewith it possessed that people, is an evidence ; and their passionate aifrighted wish thereupon, " Let not God any more speak to us, lest we die." They apprehended ft impossible for them to outlive such another sight ! And if that so amazing an appearance of the Divine Majesty (sometime affurded) were not necessary, but some way, on the by, useful, for the confirming that people in the persuasion of God's existence, why may it not be useful also, for the same purpose even now, to usl Is it that we think that can be less true now, which was so gloriously evident to be true four thousand years ago 1 Or is it that we can disbelieve or doubt the truth of the his- tory % What should be the ground or pretence of doubt 1 If it were a fiction, it is manifest it was feigned by some person that had the iLse of his understanding, and was not beside himself, as the coherence and contexture of parts doth plainly show. But would any man not beside him- self, designing to gain credit to a forged report of a matter of fact, ever say there were six hundred thousand persons present at the doing of if? Would it not rather have been pretended done in a corner 1 Or is it imaginable it should never have met with contradiction 1 That none of the pre- tended bystanders should disclaim the avouchment of it, ajid say they Imew of no such matter 1 Especially if it be considered that the lav/s'said to be given at that time, chiefly those which were reported to have been written in the two tables, were not so favourable to vicious inclina- tions, nor that people so strict and scrupulous observers ot'them^but that they would have been glad to have had any thing to pretend, against the authority of the legisla- ture, if the case could have admitted it. When they dis- covered, in that and succeeding time, so violently prone and unretractable a propension to idolatry and other wickednesses, directly against the very letter of that law, how welcome and covetable a plea had it been, in their frequent, and, sometimes, almost universal apostacies, could they have had such a thing to pretend, that the law itself that curbed them was a cheat ! But we always find, that though they laboured, in some of their degene- racies, and when they were lapsed into a more corrupted state, to render it more easy to themselves by favour- able glosses and interpretations ; yet, even in the most corrupt, they never went about to deny or implead its divine original, whereof they were ever so religious as- sertors, as no people under heaven could be more ; and the awful apprehension whereof prevailed so far with them, as that care was taken (as is notoriously known) by those appointed to that charge, that the very letters should be numbered of the sacred writings, lest there should happen any the minutest alteration in them. Much more might be said, if it were needfal, for the evincing the truth of this particular piece of history: and it's little'to be doubted but any man who, with sober and impartial reason, con- siders the circumstances relating to it; the easily evidence- able antiquity of the records whereof this a part; the certain nearness of the time of writing them, to the time when this thing is said to have been done ; the great re- putation of the writer even among pagans ; the great mul- titude of the alleged witnesses and spectators; the no- contradiction ever heard of; the universal consent and suffrage of that nation through all times to this day, even when their practice hath been most contrary to the laws then given ; the secrirely confident and unsuspicious refer- ence of later pieces of sacred Scripture thereto, (even some parts of the New Testament,) as a most known and un- doubted thing; the long series and tract of time through which that people are said to have had extraordinary and sensible indications of the divine presence; (which, if it nad been false, could not, in so long a time, but have been evicted of falsehood ;) their miraculous and wonderful cductioa out of Egypt, not denied by any, and more ob- sciu'ely acknowledged by some heathen writers ; their con- duct through the wilderness, and settlement in Canaan ; their constitution and form of polity, known for many ages to have been a theocracy; their usual ways of consulting God, upon all more important occasions : — whosoever, I say, shall soberly consider these things, (and many more might easily occur to such as would think fit to let their thoughts dwell awhile upon this subject,) will not only, from some of them, think it highly improbable, but from others of them, plainly impossible, that the history of this appearance should have been a contrived piece of falsehood. Yea, and though, as was said, the view of such a thing with one's own eyes would make a more powerful impres- sion upon our fancy, or imagination, yet, if we speak of rational evidence (which is quite another thing) of ihe truth of a matter of fact that were of this astonishing nature, I should think it were as much (at least if I were credibly told that so many hundred thousand persons saw il at once) as if I had been the single unaccompanied spectator of it myself. Not to say that it were apparently, in some respect, much greater; could we but obtain of ourselves to distinguish between the pleasing of our curiosity, and the satisfyng of our reason. So that, upon the whole, I see not why it may not be concluded, with the greatest confidence, that both the (supposed) existence of a Deity is possible to be certainly known to men on earth, in some way that is suitable to their present state; that there are no means fitter to be ordinary, than those we already have, and that more extraordinary, additional con- firmations are partly, therefore, not necessary, and partly not wanting. V. Again, it may be further demanded, (as that which may both immediately serve our main purpose, and may also show the reasonableness of what was last said,) Is it sufficiently evident to such subjects of some great prince as live remote from the royal residence, that there is such a one now ruling over them? To say No, is to raze the foundation of civil government, and reduce it wholly to domestical, by such a ruler as may ever be in present view. Which yet is upon such terms never possible to be preserved also. It is plain many do firmly enough believe that there is a king reigning over them, who not only never saw the king, but never beard any distinct account of the splendour of his court, the pomp of his attendance, or, it may be, never saw the man that had seen the king. And is not all dutiful and loyal obedience Wont to be challenged and paid as such, as well as his other subjects'? Or would it be thought a reason- able excuse of disloyalty, that any such persons should say they had never seen the king, or his court '? Or a reasonable demand, as the condition of required subjection, that the court be kept, sometime, in their village, that they might have the opportunity of beholding at least some of the insignia of regality, or more splendid appearances of that majesty, which claims subjection from them"? Much more would it be deemed unreasonable and insolent, that every subject should expect to see the face of the prince every day, otherwise they will not obey, nor believe there is any such person. Whereas it hath been judged rather more expedient and serviceable to the continuing the vene- ration of majesty, (and in a monarchy of no mean reputa- tion for wisdom and greatness,) that the prince did very rarely offer himself to the view of the people. Surely more ordinary and remote discoveries of an existing prince and ruler over them, (the effects ofhis power, and the influences of his government,) will be reckoned sufficient, even as to many parts of his dominions that possibly through many succeeding generations never had ether. And yet how unspeakably less sensible, less immediate, less constant, less necessary, less numerous, are the effects and instances of regal human power and wisdom, than of the divine ; which latter we behold which way soever we look, and feel in every thing we touch, or have any sense of, and may reflect upon in our very senses themselves, and in all the parts and powers that belong to us; and so certainly, that if we would allow ourselves the liberty of serious thoughts, we might soon find it were utterly impossible such effects should ever have been without that only cause : that without its influence, it had never been po.s- sible that we could hear, or see, or speak, or think, or live, or he any thing, nor that any other thing could ever have Ctiap. V. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 41 been, when as the effects that serve so justly to endear and recommend to us civil government, (as peace, safety, order, quiet possession of our rights,) we cannot but know, are not inseparably and incoramunicably approriate, or to be attributed to the person of this or that particular and mor- tal governor, but may also proceed from another; yea, and the same benefits may (for some short time at least) be continued without any such government at all. Nor is this intended merely as a rhetorical scheme of speech, to beguile or amuse the imwary reader ; but, without arro- gating any thing, or attributing more to it, than that it is an altogether inartificial and very defective, but true and naked, representation of the very case itself as it is. It is professedly propounded, as having somewhat solidly argu- mentative in it. That is, that (whereas thereis most con- fessedly sufficient, j'et) there is unspeakably less evidence to most people in the world, under civil government ; that there actually is such a government existent over them ; and that they are under obligation to be subject to it ; than there is of the existence of a Deity, and the consequent reasonableness of religion. If therefore the ordinary effects and indications of the former be sufficient, which have so contingent and uncertain a connexion with their causes, (while those which are more extraordinary are so exceeding rare with the most,) why shall not the more certain ordinary discoveries of the latter be judged suffi- cient, though the most have not the immediate notice of any such extraordinary appearances as those are which have been before mentioned 1 VI. Moreover, I yet demand further, whether it may be thought possible for any one to have a full rational cer- tainty that another person is a reasonable creature, and bath in him a rational soul, so as to judge he hath suffi- cient ground and obligation to converse with him, and carry towards him as a man 1 Without the supposition of this, the foundation of all human society and civil conversation is taken awa^^. And what evidence have we of it, whereunto that which we have of the being of God (as the foundation of religious and godly conversa- tion) will not at least be found equivalent. Will we say that mere human shape is enough to prove such a one a man"? A philosopher would deride us, as the Stagyrite's disciples are said to have done the Platonic man. But we will not be so nice. We acknowledge it is, if no circumstances concur (as sudden appearing, va- nishing, transformation, or the like) that plainly evince the contrary ; so far as to infer upon us an obligation not to be rude and uncivil; that we use no violence, nor carry ourselves abusively towards one that only thus appears a human creature. Yea, and to perform any duty of jus- tice or charity towards him within our power, which we owe to a man as a man. As suppose we see him wronged or in necessity, and can presently right or relieve him ; though he do not or cannot represent to us more of his case than our own eyes inform us of. And should an act of murder be committed upon one whose true humanity was not otherwise evident, would not the offender be justly li- able to the kno'WTi and common punishment of that event 1 Nor could he acquit himself of transgressing the laws of humanity, if he should only neglect any seasonable act of justice or mercy towards him, whereof he beholds the pre- sent occasion. But if any one were disposed to cavil, or play the sophist, how much more might be said, even by infinite degrees, to oppose this single evidence of any one's true humanity, than ever was or can be brought against the entire concurrent evidence we have of the existence of God. It is, here, most manifestly just and equal, thus to state the case, and compare the whole evidence we have of the latter, with that one of the former ; inasmuch as that one alone is apparently enough to oblige us to carry towards such a one as a man. And if that alone be suffi- cient to oblige us to acts of justice or charity towards man, he is strangely blind that cannot see infinitely more to oblige him to acts of piety towards God. But if we would take a nearer and more strict view of this parallel, we would state the general and more obvious aspect of this world on the one hand, and the external aspect and shape of a man on the other ; and should then see the former doth evidence to us an in-dwelling Deil^' diffused through the whole, and actuatiugevery part with incomparably greater certainty, than the latter doth an in-dwelling reasonable soul. In which way we shall find what will aptly serve our present purpose, though we are far from apprehending any such union of the blessed God with this world, as is between the soul and body of a maru It is manifestly possible to our understandings, that there may be, and (ii any hi.story or testimony of others be worthy to be believed) certain to experience and sense, that there often hath been, the appearance of human shape and of agreeable actions without a real man. But it is no way possible such a world as this should have ever been without God. That there is a world, proves that eternal Being to exist, whom we take to be God, (snppo.se we it as rude a heap as at first it was, or as we can sup- pose it,) as external appearance represents to us that cr-ea- ture which we take to be a man : but that as a certain in- fallible discovery, necessarily true ; this but as a probable and conjectural one, and (though highly probable) not im- possible to be false. And if we will yet descend to amore particular inquiry into this matter, w'hich way will we fully be ascertained that this supposed man is truly and really what he seems to be 7 This we know not how to go about, without recol- lecting what is the differencing notion we have of a man 4 that he is, viz. a reasonable, living creature, or a reason- able soul, inhabitinsT, and united with a hoAy. And how do we think to descry that, here, which may answer this common notion we have of a man 1 Have we any way besides that discovery which the acts and effects of reason, do make of a rational or intelligent beingl We will look more narrowly, i. e. unto somcAvhat else than his external appearance; and observe the actions that proceed from a more distinguishing principle in him, that he reasons, dis- courses, doth business, pursues designs; in short, he talks and acts as a reasonable creature: and hence we conclude him to be one, or to have a reasonable soul in him. And have we not the same way of procedure in the other case 1 Our fir.st view or takingnotice of a world full of life and motion, assures us of an eternal active Being, be- sides it, which we take to be God, having now before our eyes a darker shadow of him only, as the external bulk of the human body is onlv the shadow of a man. Whicli, when we behold it stirring and moving, assures us there is somewhat besides that grosser bulk, (that of itself could not so move,) which we take to be the soul of a man. Yet, as a principle that can move the body makes not up the entire notion of this soul, so an eternal active being, that moves the matter of the universe, makes not up the full notion of God. We are thus far sure in both cases, i. c. of some mover distinct from what is moved. But we are not yet sure, by what we hitherto see, what the one or the other is. But as when we have upon the first sight lhou<^ht it was a reasonable soul that was acting in the former or a man, (if we will speak according to their sense who make the soul the man,) in order to being sure, (as .sure as the case can admit,) we have no other way, but to consider what belongs more distinguishmgly to the notion of a man, or of a reasonable soul ; and observe how- actions and effects, which we have opportunity to take notice of, do answer thereto, or serve to discover that, bo when we would be sure what that eternal active Being is (which that it is, we are already sure, and) which we have taken to be God, that, I say, we may be sure of that also, we have the same thing to do. That is, to consider what more peculiarly belongs to the entire notion of Grod, (and would even in"the judgment of opposei-i,be acknowledged to belono- to n ) and see whether his works, more narrowly- inspected, do not bear as manifest correspondency to that notion of God, as the works and actions of a man do to the notion we have of him. And certainly we cannot but find they do correspond as much. And that upon a seri- ous and" considerate view of the works and appearances of God in the world ; having diligently observed and pon- dered the vastness and beauty of this universe, the variety, the multitude, the order, the exquisite shapes and numer- ous parts, the admirable and useful composure, of parti- cular creatures; and especially the constitution and powers of the reasonable soul of man itself; we cannot, surety, if we be not under the possession of a very voluntar}- and obstinate blindness, and the power of a most vicious pre- 42 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 1. judice, but acknowledge the making, sustaining, and go- verning such a world, is as god-like, as worthy of God, and as much becoming him, according to the notion that hath been assigned of him, as at least the common actions of ordinary men, are of a man ; or evidence the doer of them to be a human creature. Yea, and with this advan- tageous difference, that the actions of a man do evidence a human creature more uncertainly, and so as it is possible the matter may be otherwise. But these works of God do with so plain and demonstrative evidence discover him the Author of them, that it is altogether impossible they could ever otherwise have been done. Now therefore, if we have as clear evidence of a Deity, as we can have, in a way not unsuitable to the nature and present state of man ; (and we can have in a suitable way, that which is sufficient ;) if we have clearer and more certain evidence of God's government over the world, than most men have or can have, of the existence of their secular rulers ; yea, more sure than that there are men on earth, and that thence (as far as the existence of God will make towards it) there is a less disputable ground for re- ligioris than for civil conversation ; we may reckon our- selves competently well ascertained, and have no longer reason to delay the dedication of a temple to him, upon any pretence of doubt, whether we have an object of wor- ship existing, 3^ea or no. Wherefore we may also by the way take notice how im- pudent a thing is atheism, that by the same fulsome and poisonous breath whereby it would blast religion, would despoil man of his reason and apprehensive power, even in reference to the most apprehensible thing ; would blow away the rights of princes, and all foundations of policy and government, and destroy all civil commerce and con- versation out of the world, and yet blushes not at the at- tempt of so foul things. VII. And here it may perhaps prove worth our while (though it can be no pleasant contemplation) to pause a little, and make some short reflections upon the atheistical temper and genius, so as therein to remark some few more obvious characters of atheism itself. And Jirst, such as have not been themselves seized by the infatuation, cannot but judge it a most unreasonable thing, a perverse and cross-grained humour, that so oddly writhes and warps the mind of a man, as that it never makes any effort or offer at any thing against the Deity ; but it therein dolh (by a certain sort of serpentine invo- lution and retortion) seem to design a quarrel with itself: that is, with (what one would think should be most inti- mate and natural to the mind of man) his very reasoning power, and the operations thereof So near indeed was the ancient alliance between God and man, (his own Son, his likeness and living image,) and consequently between reason and religion, that no man can ever be engaged in an opposition to God and his interest, but he must be equal- ly so to himself and his own. And any one that takes no- tice how the business is carried by an atheist, must think, in order to his becoming one, his first plot was upon him- self: to assassine his own intellectual i^aculty, by a sturdj^ resolution, and violent imposing on himself, not to consi- der, or use his thoughts, at least with any indifferency, but with a treacherous predetermination to the part resolved on before-hand. Otherwise, it is hard to be imagined how it should ever have been possible that so plain and evident proofs of a Deity as every where offer themselves unto observation, even such as have been here proposed, (that do even lie open,^or the most part, to common apprehen- sion, and needed little search to fuid them out ; so that it was harder to determine what not to say, than what to say,) could be overlooked. For what could be more easy and obvious, than taking notice that there is somewhat in being, to conclude that somewhat must be of itself, from whence whatever is not so must have sprung 1 That, since there is somewhat effected or made, (as is plain, in that some things are al- terable, and daily altered, which nothing can be that is of itself, and therefore a necessary being,) those effects have then had an active being for their cause 1 That since the.se effects are partly such as bear the manifest characters of wisdom and design upon them, and are partly, themselves, wise and designing ; therefore they must have had a wisely active and designing cause 1 So much would plainly con- clude the sum of what we have been pleading for ; and what can be plainer or doth require a shorter turn of thoughts 1 At this eo.sy expense might any one that had a disposition to use his understanding to such a purpose, save himself from being an atheist. And where is the flaw "? What joint is not firm and .strong in this little frame of discourse 1 which yet arrogates nothing to the contri- ver; for there is nothing in it worthy to be called contri- vance ; but things do themselves lie thus. And what hath been further said concerning the perfection and oneness of this Cause of all things, (though somewhat more remote from common apprehension,) is what it is likely would appear plain and natural to such as would allow them- selves the leisure to look more narrowly into such things. Atheism therefore seems to import a direct and open hostility against the most native, genuine, and facile dic- tates of common reason. And being so manifest an enemy to it, we cannot suppose it should be at all befriended by it. For that will be always true and constant to itself, whatsoever false shows of it a bad cause doth sometimes put on ; that having yet somewhat a more creditable name, and being of a little more reputation in the world, than plain downright madness and folly. And it will appear how little it is befriended, by any thing that can justly bear that name, if we consider the pitiful shifts the atheist makes for his forlorn cause ; and what infirm tottering supports the whole frame of atheism rests upon. For what is there to be said for their hypothesis, or against the existence of God, and the dueness of religion 1 For it, there is directly nothing at all. Only a possibility is al- leged, things might be as they are, though God did not exist. And if this were barely possible, how little doth that signify 1 Where reason is not injuriously dealt with, it is permitted the liberty of balancing things equally, and of considering which scale hath most weight. And is he not perfectly blind, that sees flot what violence is done to free reason in this matter 1 Are there not thousands of things, not altogether impossible, which yet he would be concluded altogether out of his wits, that should profess to be of the opinion they are, or were actually so 1 And as to the present case, how facile and imexceplionable, how plain and intelligible, is the account that is given of the- original of this world, and the things contained in it, by resolving all into a Deity, the Author and Maker of them 1 Whereas the wild, extravagant suppositions of atheists, if they were admitted possible, are the most unlikely that could be devised. So that if there had been any to have laid wagers, when things were taking their beginning,there is nobody that would not have ventured thousands to one, that no such frame of things (no not so much as one single mouse or flea) would ever have hit. And how desperate hazards the atheist runs, upon this mere supposed possi- bility, it will be more in our way to take notice by and by. But besides, that pretended possibility plainly appears none at all. It is impossible any thing should spring up of itself out of nothing ; that any thing that is alterable, should have been necessarily of itself, such as it now is ; that what is of itself unactive, should be the maker of other things ; that the Author of all the wisdom in the world, should be, himself, unwise. These cannot but be judged most absolute impo.ssibilities, to such as do not vi- olence to their own minds ; or with whom reason can be allowed any the least exercise. Wherefore the atheistical spirit is most grossly unreasonable, in withholding assent, v/here the most ungainsayable reason plainly exat;ts it. And are not the atheist's cavils as despicably silly against the Deity, and (consequently) religion'? Whosoever shall consider their exceptions against some things in the notion of God, eternity, infinity, &c. which themselves, in the meantime, are "forced to place elsewhere, will he not see they talk idly 1 And as for such other impeachments of his wisdom, justice, and goodness, as they take their ground for, from the state of affairs, in some respects, in this present world, (many of which maybe seen in Lucretius, and ansAvered by Dr. More in his Dialogties,) how incon- siderable will they be, to any one that bethinks himself, with how perfect and generous a liberty this world was? made, by one that needed it not; who had no design, nor could have inclination to a fond, self-indulgent glorying CsAP. V. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 43 and vaunting of his own work ; who did it with the great- est facility, and by an easy, iinexpensive vouchsafement of his good pleasure ; not with an operose curiosity, studious to approve itself to the peevish eye of every froward Mo- mus, or to the nauseous, squeamish gust of every sensual Epicure. And to such as shall not confine their mean thoughts to that very clod or ball of earth on which they live; which, as it is a very small part, may, for aught we know, but be the worst or most abject part of God's creation; which yet is full of his goodness, and hath most manifest prints of his other excellences besides, as hath been observed; or that shall not look upon the present state of things as the eternal state, but upon this world only as an antechamber to another, which shall abide in most unexceptionable perfection for ever: — how fond and idle, I say, will all such cavils appear to one that shall but thus use his thoughts, and not think himself bound to measure his conceptions of God by the uncertain, rash dictates of men born in the dark, and that talk at random ; nor shall affix any thing to him, which plain reason doth not dictate, or which he doth not manifestly assume, or challenge to himself But that because a straw lies in my way, I would attempt to overturn heaven and earth, what raging phrensy is this ! Again, it is a base, abject temper, speaks a mind sunk and lost in carnality, and that having dethroned and ab- jured reason, hath abandoned itself to the hurry of vile appetite, and sold its liberty and sovereignty for the insipid, gustless pleasures of sense ; an unmanly thing — a degrad- ing of oneself For if there be no God, what am I*? A piece of moving, thinking clay, whose ill-compacted parts will shortly fly asunder, and leave no other remains of me than what shall become the prey and triumph of worms ! It is a sad, mopish, disconsolate temper ; cuts off and quite banishes all manly, rational joy ; all that might spring from the contemplation of the divine excellences and glory, shining in the works of his hands. Atheism clothes the world in black, draws a dark and duskish cloud over all things ; doth more to damp and stifle all relishes of intellectual pleasure, than it would of sensible, to extinguish the sim. What is this world (if we should suppose it still to subsist) without Godl How grateful an entertainment is it to a pious mind to behold his glory stamped on eveiy creature, sparkling in every providence ; and by a firm and rational faith to believe (when we can- not see) how all events are conspiring to bring about the most happy and blissful state of things ! The atheist may make the most of this world; he knows no pleasure, but what can be drawn out of its dry breasts, or found in its cold embraces ; which yields as little satisfaction, as he finds, whose arms, aiming to enclose a dear friend, do onl}' clasp a stiff and clammy carcass. How uncomfortable a thing is it to him, that having neither power nor wit to order things to his own advantage or content, but finds himself liable to continual disappointments, and the ren- counter of many an unsuspected, cross accident, hath none to repose on that is vyiser and mightier than himself! But when he finds he cannot command his own affairs, to have the settled apprehension of an Almighty Ruler, that can with the greatest certainty do it for us the best way, and will, if we trust him — how satisfying and peaceful a repose doth this yield ! And how much the rather, inasmuch as that filial, unsuspicious confidence and trust, which natu- rally tends to and begets that calm and quiet rest, is the very condition required on my part ; and that the chief thing I have to do, to have my affaire brought to a good pass, is to commit them to his management ; and my only care, to be careful in nothing. The atheist hath nothing to mitigate the greatness of this loss, but that he knows not what he loses; which is an allay that will serve but a little while. And when the most unsupportahle, pressing miseries befall him, he must in bitter agonies groan out his •wretched soul without hope, and sooner die under his burden, than say. Where is my God and Maker 1 At the best, he exchanges all the pleasure and composure of mind which certainly accompanies a dutiful, son-like trust, sub- f Wliich story I confidently refer to, hein? of late date, and hanng had a r.ertain and circumstantial account of it, by one (a viTy sober and intelligent person) who had the relation from hin> to whom that dreadful warning was given, by his then lately deceased associate. But I shall not by a particular . mission, and resignation of ourselve.% and all our concern- ments, to the disposal of fatherly wisdom and Icve, for e sour and sullen succumbency to an irresistible fate or hard necessity, against which he sees it is vain to contend. So that at the best he not only rages, but tastes nothing of consolation; whereof his spirit is as incapable, as his des- perate affairs are of redress. And if he have arrived to that measure of foriiiude, as not to be much discomposed with the lighter crosses which he meets with in this short time of life, what a dreadful cross is it that he must die! How dismal a thing is a certain, never to be avoided death ! Against which as atheism hath not surely the ad- vantage of religion in giving protection ; so it hath greatly the disadvantage, in afibrding no relief What would the joy be worth in that hour, that arises from the hope of the glory to be revealed 1 And is the want of tliat, the total sum of the atheist's misery at this hour^ What heart can conceive the horror of that one thought, if darted in upon him at that time, (as it is strange, and more sad, if it be not,) What becomes now of me, if there prove to be a God 1 Where are my mighty demonstrations, upon which one may venture, and which may cut off all fear and danger of future calamity in this dark, unknown state I am going into'? Shall I be the next hour nothing, or miserable !? Or if I had opportunity, shall I not have sufficient cause to proclaim, (asf once one of the same fraternity did, by way of warning to a surviving companion) — A great and a terrible God ! A great and a terrible God ! A great and a terrible God. I only add, 'tis a most strangely mysterious and unac- covmtable temper ; such as is hardly reducible to its pro- per causes: so that it would puzzle any man's inquirj' to find out or even give but probable conjectures, how so odd and preternatural a disaffection as atheism should ever come to have place in a human mind. It must be con- cluded a very complicated disease, and yet, when our thoughts have fastened upon several things that have an aspect that way, as none of them alone could infer it, sa it is hard to imagine, how ail of them together should ever come to deprave reasonable nature to such a degree. 'Tis, first, most astonishingly marvellous, (though it is apparent this distemper hath its rise from an HI will,) that any should so much as will that which the atheist hath obtained of himself to believe; or afJect to be, what he is. The commonness of this vile disposition of will, doth but sorrily shift off the wonder, and only with tho.se slight and trifling minds that have resigned the office of judging things to their (more active) senses, and have leanied the easy way of waving all inquiries about common things, or resolving the account into this only, that they are to be seen every day. But if we allowed ourselves to consider this matter soberly, we would soon find, that howsoever it must plainly appear a very common plague upon the spirits of men (and universal till a cure be wrought) to say, by way of wish, No God, or I would there were none: yet by the good leave of them who would thus easily excuse the thing, the commonness of this horrid evil doth so little diminish, that it increases the wonder. Things are more strange, as their causes are more hardly assignable. What should the reason be, that a being of so incomparable excellency, so amiable and allur- ing glory, purity, love, and goodness, is become imdesir- able and hateful to his own creatures! that such creatures, his more immediate, peculiar offsprin'j, stamped with his likeness, the so vivid resemblances of his own spiritual immortal nature, are become so wickedly unnatural to- wards their common and most indulgent parent i what, to wish him dead ! to envy life and being, to him from whom they have rec«ved their own ! 'Tis as strange as it is without a cause. But they have offended him, are in a revolt, and sharply conscious of fearful demerits. And who would not wish to live, and to escape so unsupportahle revenge 1 'Tis still strange we would ever offend such a one! Wherein were his laws imequal, his government grievous 1 But since we have, this only is pertinent to be said by them that have no hope of forgiveness, that are left I relation gratify the .scorn of this sort of men, who. taking advantage from the (sometime deceived) credulity of well-meaning people have but tjiat way of answering all such tilings, by the one word which served so learnedly to ooniufe Bellamiine. i 44 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. to despair of reconciliation— Why do we sort ourselves with devils 1 We profess not to be such. Yea, but we have no hope to be forgiven the sin we do not leave, nor power to leave the sin which now we love. This, instead of lessening, makes the wonder a miracle. O wretched, forlorn creature ! Wouldst thou have God out of being for this'? (I speak to thee who dost not yet pro- fess to believe there is no God, but dost only wish it.) The sustainer of the world ! the common basis of all being ! Dost thou know what thou sayest,'? Art thou not wishing thyself and all things into nothing 1 This, rather than humble thyself, and beg forgiveness ! This, rather than become again a holy, pure, obedient creature, and again blessed in him, who lirst made thee so ! It can never cease, I say, to be a wonder, we never ought to cease won- dering, that ever this befell the nature of man, to be prone to wisk such a thing, that there were no God ! Bat this is, 'tis true, the too common case; and if we will only have what is more a rarity go for a wonder, how amazing then is it. That if any man would, even never so fain, he ever can make himself believe there is no God ! and shape his horrid course according to that most horrid misbelief! By what fatal train of causes is this ever brought to passi Into what can we devise to resolve itl Why such as have arrived to this pitch are much ad- dicted to the pleasing of their senses ; and this they make their business; so as that, for a long time, they have given themselves no leisure to mind objects of another nature; especially that should any way tend to disturb them in their easy course; till they are gradually fallen into a for- getful sleep, and the images of things are worn out with them, that had only more slightly touched their minds Defore. And being much used to go by the suggestions of sense, they believe not what they neither see nor feel. This is somewhat, but does not reach the mark; for there are many very great sensualists, (as great as they at least,) who never arrive hither, but firmly avow it that they believe a Deity, whatsoever mistaken notion they have of him ; whereupon they imagine to themselves impunity in their vicious course. But these, it may be said, have so disaccustomed themselves to the exercise of their reason, that they have no disposition to use their thoughts about any thing above the sphere of sense ; and have contracted so dull and sluggish a temper, that they are no fitter to mind or em- ploy themselves in any speculations that tend to beget in them the knowledge of God, than any man is for discourse or business when he is fast asleep. So indeed, in reason, one would expect to find it; but the case is so much otherwise, when we consider particular instances, that we are the more perplexed and entangled in this inquiry, by considering how agreeable it is, that the matter should be thus; and observing that it proves, oft- times, not to be so ; insomuch that reason and experience .seem herein not to agree, and hence we are put again upon new conjectures what the immediate cause of this strange malady should be. For did it proceed purely from a sluggish temper of mind, unapt to reasoning and dis- course ; the more any were so, the more disposed they should be to atheism : whereas, every one knows that multitudes of persons of dull and slow minds, to any thing of ratiocination, would rather you should burn their houses, than tell them they did not believe in God : and would presently tell you, it were pity he should live, that should but intimate a doubt whether there were a God or no. Yea, and man}', somewhat more intelligent, yet in this matter are shy of using their reason, and think it un- .safe, it not profane, to go about to prove that there is a God, lest they should move a doubt, or seem hereby to make a question of it. And in the mean time, while they offer not at reasoning, they more meanly supply that want, after a sorry fashion, from their education, the tradition of their forefathers, common example, and the universal pro- fession and practice of some religion round about them ; and it may be only take the matter for granted, because they never heard such a thing was ever doubted of or called in question in all their lives. Whereas, on the other hand, they who incline to atheism g Anst. Elli. 1. 3. are, perhaps, some of them the greatest pretenders to rea- son. They rely little upon authority of former times and ages, upon vulgar principles and maxims, but are vogued great masters of reason, diligent searchers into the myste- ries of nature, and can philosophize (as sufficiently appears) beyond all imagination. But 'tis hoped it may be truly- said, for the vindication of philosophy and them that pro- fess it, that modern atheists have little of that to glory in ; and that their chief endowments are only their skill to please their senses, and a faculty with a pitiful sort of drollery to tincture their cups, and add a grace to their otherwise dull and flat conversation. Yet all this howso- ever being considered, there is here but little advance made to the finding out whence atheism should proceed. For, that want of reason shall be thought the cause, what hath been already said seems to forbid ; that many igno- rant persons seem possessed with a great awe of a Deity, from which divers, more knowing, have delivered them- selves. And yet neither doth the former signify any thing (in just interpretation) to the disrepute of religion. For truth is not the less true, for that some hold it they know not how or why. Nor doth the latter make to the reputa- tion of atheism, inasmuch as men, otherwise rational, may sometimes learnedly dote. But it confirms us that atheism is a strange thing, when its extraction and pedigree are so hardly found out, and it seems to be directly of the lineage, neither of knowledge nor ignorance, neither sound reason nor perfect dotage. Nor doth it at all urge to say, And why may we not as well stand wondering, whence the apprehension of a God, and an addictedness to religion, should come, when we find them peculiar neither to the more knowing nor the more ignorant 1 For they are apparently and congruously enough to be derived from somewhat common to them both — the impression of a Deity, imiversally put upon the minds of all men, (which atheists have made a shift to rase out, or obliterate to that degree, as to render it illegi- ble,) and that cultivated by the exercise of reason, in some, and in others, less capable of that help, somewhat con- firmed by education, and the other accessaries mentioned above. Therefore is this matter still most mysteriously intricate, that there should be one temper and persuasion, agreeing to two so vastly different sorts of persons, while yet we are to seek for a cause (except what is most tremendous to think of) from whence it should proceed, that is common to them both. And here is, in short, the sum of the won- der, that any, not appearing very grossly unreasonable in other matters, (which cannot be denied even of some of the more sensual and lewder sort of atheists,) should, in so plain and important a case, be so, beyond all expression, absurd; that they without scruple are pleased to think like other men in matters that concern and relate to com- mon practice, and wherein they might more colourably, and with less hazard, go out of the common road ; and are here only so dangerously and madly extravagant. Theirs is therefore a particidar madness ; the dementia quoad hoc ; so much 'the stranger thing, because they whom it pos- sesses do only in this one case put off themselves, and are like themselves and other men in all things else. If they reckoned it a glory to be singular, they might (as hath been plainly shown) more plausibly profess it as a principle, that they are not bound to believe the existence of any secular ruler (and consequently not be subject to any) longer than they see him, and so subvert all policy and government; or pretend an exemption from all obligation to any act of justice, or to forbear the most injurious vio- lence towards any man, because they are not infallibly certain any one they see is a human wight, and so abjure all morality, as they have already so great a part ; than offer with so fearful hazard to assault the Deity, (of whose existence, if they would but think a while, they might be most infallibly assured,) or go about to subvert the foun- dations of religion. Or, if they would get themselves glory by great adventures, or show themselves brave men by expressing a fearless contempt of divine power and justice ; this fortitude is not human. These are without the com- pass of its object ;£ as inundations, earthquakes, &c., are Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 45 said to be, unto which, that any one should fearlessly ex- pose himself, can bring no profit to others, nor therefore glory to him. In all this harangue of discourse, the design hath not been to fix upon any true cause of atheism, but to repre- sent it a strange thing; and an atheist, a prodigjs a mon- ster, amongst mankind; a dreadful spectacle, forsaken of the common aids afforded to other men ; hnng up in chains to warn others, and let them see what a horrid creature man may make himself by voluntary aversion from God that made him. In the meantime, they upon whom this dreadful plague is not fallen, may plainly see before them the object of that worship which is imported by a temple — an existing Deity, a God to be worshipped. Unto whom we shall yet see further reason to design and consecrate a temple for that end, and even ourselves to become such, when we have considered what comes next to be spoken of: his conversableness with men. CHAPTER VI. what is intended by God's conversableness witli men, considered only as run- damental and presupposed to a temple. An account of the Epicurean deity. Its existence impossible any way to be proved, if it did exist. Nor can be affirmed to any good intent. That such a being is not God. That the abso- lute perfection proved of God represents him a fit object of religion. From thence more particularly deduced to this purpose. His omnisciency, omnipo- tency, unlimited goodness, immensity. Curcclla;us's arguments against tiiis last considered. I. Nor is the thing here intended less nece-ssary to a temple and religion than what we have hitherto been dis- coursing of For such a sort of deity as should shut up itself, and be reclused from all converse with men, would leave us asdisfumished of an object of religion, and would render a temple on earth as vain a thing, as if there were none at all. It were a being not to be worshipped, nor with any propriety to be called God, more (in some re- spect less) than an image or statue. We might with as rational design worship for a god what were scarce worthy to be called the shadow of a man, as dedicate temples to a wholly unconversable deity. That is, such a one as not only will not vouchsafe to convei-se with men, but that cannot admit it ; or whose nature were altogether incapa- ble of such converse. For that measure and latitude of sense must be allowed unto the expression, [conversableness with men,] as that it signify both capacity and propension to such converse : that God is both by his nature capable of it, and hath a gracious inclination of will thereunto. Yea and we will add, (what is also not without the compass of our present theme, nor the import of this word whereby we generally express it,) that he is not only inclined to converse with men, but that he actually doth it. As we call him a con- versable person that upon all befitting occasions doth freely converse with such as have any concern with him. It will indeed be necessary to distinguish God's converse with men, into That which he hath in common with «//??ic?(., so as to sustain them in their beings, and some way influence their actions ; (in which kind he is also conversant with all his creatures ;} and That which he more peculiarly hath with good men. And though the consideration of the latter of these Avill belong to the discourse concerning his temple itself which he hath with and in them ; yet it is the former only we have now to consider as presupposed thereto, and as the ground thereof; together with his gracious propension to the latter also. As the great apostle, in his discourse at Athens, lavs the same ground for acquaintance with God, (which he intimates should be set afoot and continued in another sort of temple than is made with hands,) that he hath given to all breath and being and all things, and that he i.-5"near and ready, (whence they should therefore seek him, if haply they might feel after him, and find him out,) in order to further converse. And here, our business will have the less in it of labour and difficulty ; for that we a Ac designare quidem non licet quibus in locis Dii degant. Cum ne shall have little else to do, besides only the applying of principles already asserted (or po.ssibly the moie express adding of some or other that were implied in what hath been said) to this purpose. From which principles it will appear, that he nui only can, but that in the former sense he doth, converse with men, and is graciously inclined thereto in the latter. And yet because the former is more deeply fimdamental, as whereon all depends, and that the act of it is not denied for any other reason than an ima- gined impos.sibilit}' ; that is, it is not said he doth not sus tain and govern the world upon any other pretence, but that he cannot, as being inconsiMent with his nature and felicity. This we shall therefore more directly apply our- selves to evince. That his nature doth not disallow it, but necessarily includes an aptitude theieto. Nor yet, though it may be a less laborious work than the former that we have despatched, is it altogether need- less to deal somewhat more expressly in this matter , inasmuch as what opposition hath been made to religion in the world, hath for the most part been more expressly directed against this ground of it. I say more expressly ; for indeed by plain and manifest consequence it impugns that also of God's existence : that is, through this it strikes at the other. For surely (howsoever any may arbitrarily, and with what impropriety and latitude of .speech they please, bestow titles and eulogies here or there) that being is not God, that cannot converse with men, supposing them such as what purely and peculiarly belongs to the nature of man would bespeak them. So that they who have imagined such a being, and been pleased to call it God, have at once said and unsaid the same thing. That deity was but a creature, and that only of their own fancy ; and they have by the same breath blown up and blasted their own bubble, made it seem something and signify nothing: have courted it into being, and rioted it again quite out of it. In their conceit, created it a god ; in their practice, a mere nullity. And it equally served their turn, and as much favoured the design of being wicked, to ac- knowledge only a god they could imagine and dis-imagine at their own pleasure, as to have acknowledged none at all. It could do no prejudice to their aflairs to admit of this fictitious deity, that the}' could make be what or where they pleased ; that should afi'ect ease and pleasure, and (lest his pleasure and theirs should interfere) that they could confine to remote territories, and oblige to keep at an obedient and untroublesome distance. Nor, though no imagination could be more madly extravagant than that of a God no way concerned in the forming and governing of the world ; and notwithstanding whom, men might take their liberty to do what they listed ; yet (as hath been observed long ago, that no opinion was ever so monstrously absurd, as not to be owned by some of the philosopher's) hath not this wanted patronage, and even among them who have obtained to he esteemed (not to say idolized) under that name. Which would be seen, if it were worth the while to trouble the reader with an ac- count of the Epicurean deity. As it can only be with this design, that the representation may render it (as it cannot but do) ridiculous to sober men ; and discover to the rest the vanitj^ of their groundless and self-contradict- ing hope, (still too much fostered in the breasts of not a few.) who promise themselves impunity in the most licen- tious course of wickedness, upon the security only of this their own idle dream. That is, if there be a God, (which the}' reckon it not so plausible flatly to deny,) he is a being of either so dull and phlegmatic a temper that he cannot be concerned in the actions and aflairs of men. or so soft and easy that he will not. But because his good will alone was not so safely to be relied on, it was thought the securer way not to let it be in his power to intermed- dle with their concernments. And therefore being to frame their own Gtt)d, to their own turn, thus the matter was of old contrived. First, Great care was taken. That he be set at a di.s. tance remote enough ; that he be complimented oiu of this world, as a pkice loo mean for his reception, and unwor> thy such a presence ; they being indeed unconcerned where J*e^fcad his residence, so it were* not too-near them. nostor quidem hie mundus, digiia sit illonmi sedes.- Phil. Epicur. S>-ntaf. 46 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. So that a confinement of him somewhere, was thought altogether necessaay. Secondly, And then, with the same pretence of great observance and respect, it is judged too great a trouble to him, and inconsistent with the felicity of his nature and being, that he should have given himself any diversion or disturbance, by making the world ; from the care and la- bour whereof "he is with all ceremony to be excused, it being too painful and laborious an undertaking lor an im- mortal and a happy being. Besides tliat he was altogether destitute of instruments and utensils requisite to so great a performance. b Whence also. Thirdly,'^ He was with the same reason to be excused of all the care and encumbrance of govern- ment; as indeed, what right or pretence could he have to the government of a world that chose him not, which is not his inheritance, and which he never made 1 But all is very plausibly shadowed over with a great appearance of reverence and veneration, with magnificent elogies of his never-interrupted felicity ; whence also it is made a very great crime not to free even the divine nature itself from business : though yet the true ground and root of this Epicurean faith doth sometime more apparently discover itself, even an impatiency of the divine government, and a regret of that irksome bondage which the acknowledg- ment of a Deity, that were to be feared by men, would infer upon them. And therefore. Fourthly, He is further expressly asserted to be such as need not be feared, as cares not to be wor- shipped, as with whom neither anger nor favour hath any place. So that nothing more of duty is owing to him than a certain kind of arbitrary veneration, which we give to any thing or person that we apprehend to excel us, and to be in some respect better than ourselves: an observance merely upon courtesy. But obedience and subjection to his government, fear of his displeasure, expectation of his favour and benefits, have no place left ihcra. We are not obliged to worship him as one with whom we have any concern, and do owe him no more homage than we have to the Great Mogul, or the Cham of Tartary, and indeed are less liable to his severity, or capable of liis favours, than theirs ; for of theirs, we are in some remote possi- bility, of his, in none at all. In one word, all converse between him and man, on his part by providence, and on ours by religion, is quite cut off. Which evidently appears (from what hath been already collected out of his own words, and theirs who pretended to speak that so admired author's mind and sense) to be the scope and sum of the Epicurean doctrine, in this matter; and was indeed ob- served to be so long ago, by one that we suppose to have had better opportunitj' and advantages to know it, than we : who, discoursing that a man cannot live pleasantly, according to the principles of Epicurus ; and that accord- ing to his doctrine beasts are more happy than men ; plainly gives thisd reason why he says so, viz: that the Epicureans took away providence, and that the design of their discoursing concerning God w^as, that we might not fear him. Unto which purpose also much more may be seen in the same author elsewhere, when he more directly pleads (among divers more philosophical subjects) on behalf of religion against the Epicurean doctrine, which'' he saith they leave to us in word and sliow^ but by their principles take away indeed, as they do nature and the soul, &c. It is then out of question, that the doctrine of Epicurus utterly takes away all intercourse between God and man. Which yet were little worth our notice or consideration, b —nQcta (pvaii Trpog raxira nTi?iafir] TTp'ioa) caOoi, nXXff aXfiroti/jj ijroj iiiiTrp-taOu), Km cv rqi traiyri' i^otKnpiojriTt. Laertiiis, I. 10. QiiSB molilio, qii« forramcnta, qui vectes, qiisB machinae, qui ministri tanti munerjs tuenint? Veil, apud, Cieer. de Natvra Deoru7n. c Nihil beating, nihil omninoboni-iomniliusartluentius excogitari potest. Niliil eniiii agit, nullisoccupationibus est impticatus, &c. Id. Oraf,rrii' Qciav ^vaiv pn \:'Tovpytoiv airoXocoatv. Laert. ihld. Itaiiue iniposui.sfis cer\'ieibus nos- fri.i serajiitemum dominum. quern, dies et noctes, timerennis. Uuis enim ik)ii timeat omnia providentem, et coj-Ttantem, et animadveiteMtem, et omnia ad se pertinere putantem, curiosum et plenum negotii Deuin Veil, ubi mpra. Hu- mana ante oculos frede cum vita iaceret. In tenis opprcssa gravi sub relijione Primum Grains homo (ineaninsr Epicurus, t)ie first ehampion nf irreli^ion.) Lucret To lohich purpose be.iidesiohatioehaveinLacrt. To pUKcpiov Kai av npof to riftioi Criv ; eirei fc tcXoj r]v tov rrcpi Qcmv Xoyoii, to prj (po/HecaOai 6eof, aWa TtavaaaOai -npaTToptvovi, lief^aiortpov oipai tovto, &c. Plut. e Advcrsus Colotem. 11 ws ovv aTroXctnovat tpvtriv Kat i}^v\rii> xat ^; cos opKOV, (OS svxriv, (OS dvataii, (OS TTpO(TKVi>r]aiv, prjpart Kat Xo} oil, nat r(oi (pauat Kat wpoairottKrQnt Kat ovopat,civ, a rais ap\ats Kat roii ioypaatv avaipovatv. Unto which purpo.se is that also in Ttilly. Atetiamdesancti- tate, de pietate adversus Deos libros scripsit Epicurus. Ad qnomodn in his lo- quitur? ut Conmcanium aut Scaivolam Pontifices ma.vimos teaudire dicasnon eum. nni subtulerit omnem funditus relisionem : Nee manilnis ut Xerxes, sed rationitms Templa Deorum et aras everterit. Dt Natura Deorum. Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 47 to itself, while they would have that to be necessarily- existent (as they must if they will have it existent at all, unto which, in the meantime, they deny the other perfec- tions which necessar)'' existence hath been proved to include. But how vain and idle trifling is it, arbitrarily and by a random fancy to imagine any thing what we please, and attributing of our own special grace Euid favour necessary existence to it, thence to conclude that it doth exist, only because we have been pleased to make that belong to the notion of it ? What so odd and uncouth composition can we form any conception of, which we may not make exist, at this rale 1 But the notion of God is not arbitrary, but is natural, proleptical, and common to men, impressed upon the minds of all : whence they say it ought not to be drawn into con- troversy. What! thef Epicurean notion of him 1 We shall inquire further into that anon. And in the mean- time need not doubt to say, any man might with as good pretence imagine the ridiculous sort of gods described in Cicero's ironical supposition, and affirm them to exist, as they those they have thought fit to feign, and would impose upon the belief of men. And when they have fancied these to exist, is not that a mighty proof that they indeed do so 1 But that which for the present we allege, is, that supposing their notion were ever so absolutely universal and agreeing with the common sentiments of all other men, they have yet precluded themselves of any right to argue. from its commonness, to the existence of the thing itself Nor can they upon their principles form an argument hence, that shall conclude or signify any thing to this pur- pose." None can be drawn hence, that will conclude im- mediately, and itself reach the mark, without the addition of some further thing, which so ill sorts with the rest of their doctrine, that it would subvert the whole frame. That is, it follows not, that because men generally hold that there is a God, that therefore there is one ; otherwise than as that consequence can be justified by this plain and irre- fragable proof — That no reason can be devised of so gene- ral an agreement, or of that so common an impression upon the minds of men, but this only ; that it must have proceeded from one common cause, viz. God himself; who having made man so prime a part of his creation, hath stamped with his own signature this nobler piece of his workmanship, and purposely made and framed him to the acknowledgment and adoration of his Maker. But how shall they argue so, who, while they acknow- ledge a God, deny man to be his creature, and will have him and all things to be by chance, or without dependence on any Maker? What can an impression infer to this purpose, that comes no one can tell whence or how ; but is plainly denied to be from him, whose being they would argue from it 1 The observation of so common an apprehension in the minds of men, might (upon their supposition) beget much wonder, but no knowledge ; and may perplex men much, how such a thing should come to pass, without making them any thing the wiser ; and would infer astonishment, sooner than a good conclusion, or than it would solidly prove any important truth. And do they think they have salved the business, ^.nd given us a satisfying account of" this matter, by telling us, This impression is from nature, as they speak 1 It were to be -wished some of them had told us, or could yet tell us, what they meant by nature. Is it any intelligent principle, or was it guided by any such 1 If yea, whence came this impression, but from God him- self? For surely an intelligent Being, that could have this universal influence upon the minds of all men, is much liker to be God than the imaginary entities they talk of, that are bodies, and no bodies, have blood, and no blood, members, and no members, are some where, and no where ; or if they be any where, are confined to some certain places remote enough from our world ; with the affairs whereof, or any other, they cannot any way concern themselves, without quite undoing and spoiling their felicity. If they say No, and that nature, which put this stamp upon the minds of men, is an utterly unintelligent thing, nor was ever governed by any thing wiser than itself— strange ! that blind and undesigning nature should, without being f Deos, Strabones, psetiilos, n»\'um habeiUes, silos, flaccos, frontones, CApitones.— De Natura Deorum, I. l. prompted, become thus ignorantly ofl^cious to these idle, voluptuary godlings ; and should so efiectually take course they might be known to the world, who no way ever obliged it, nor were ever like to do ! But to regress a little, fain I would know what is this thing they call na- ture 1 Is it any thing else than the course and inclination of conspiring atoms, which singly are not pretended to bear any such impres.sion ; but as they luckily club and hit together, in the composition of a human soul, by the merest and strangest chance that ever happened 1 But would we ever regard what they say whom we believe to speak by chance ? Were it to be supposed that characters and words serving to make up some proposition or other, were by some strange agitation of wind and waves impressed and figured on the sand; would we, if we really believed the matter came to pass only by such an odd cas'ualty, think that proposition any whit the truer for being there, or take this for a demonstration of its truth, any more than if we had seen it in a ballad 1 Because men have casu- ally come to think so, therefore there are such beings, (to be called gods,) between whom and them there never was or shall be any intercourse or mutual concern. It follows as -tvell, a.s that because the staff stands in the comer, the morrow will be a rainy day. The dictates of nature are indeed most regardable things taken as expressions of his mind, or emanations from him, who is the Author and God of nature: but abstracted from him, they are and signify as much as a beam cut off from the body of the sun ; or a person that pretends himself an ambassador, without cre- dentials. Indeed, (as is imported in the words noted from that graves pagan a little before,) the principles of these men destro}'^ quite nature itself, as well as every thing of reli- gion ; and leave us the names and show of them, but take away the things themselves. In sum, though there be no such impression upon the minds of men as tliat which they talk of, yet if there were, no such thing can be inferred from it, as they would infer ; their principles taking away all connexion between the argument, and what they would argue by it. 2. We have also too much reason to add, That as the supposition of such a being, or sort of beings, can have no sufficient ground ; so it is equally unconceivable that it can be intended for any good end. Not that we think the last assertion a .sufficient sole proof of this ; for we easily acknowledge that it is possible enough, men may harm- lessly and with innocent intentions attempt the building very weighty and important truths upon weak and insufii- cient foundations; hoping they have offered that as a sup- port unto truth, which proves only a useless cumber. Nor were it just to impute treachery, where there is ground for the more charitable censure, that the misadventure pro- ceeded only from want of judgment and shortness of discourse. But it is neither needful nor seemly, that charit}' which can willingly wink in some cases, should therefore be quite blind ; or that no difference should be made of well-meant mistakes, and mischief thinly hid and covered over with specious pretences. And let it be so- berly considered, what can the design be, after the cashier- ing of all solid grounds for the proving of a Deity, at length to acknowledge it upon none at all ? As if their acknowledgment must owe itself not to their reason, but their courtesy. And when they have done what they can to make the rest of men believe they have no need to own any God at all, and they can tell how all tliai concerns the making and governing the world may well enough be des- patched without any, yet at last they will be so generous as to be content there shall be one, however. What, I say, can the design of this be, that they who have contended with all imaginable obstinacy against the most plain and convincing evidences, that do even defy cavil ; have quite fought themselves blind, and lost their eyes in the en- counter ; so that they at-e ready to swear the sun is a clod of dirt, and noon-day light is to them the very blackness of darkness 1 They cannot see a Deity encircling them with the brightest beams, and shining upon them with the most conspicuous glory through every thing that occurs, and all things that encompass them on every side. And e Plut&rcb. 48 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. yet when all is done, and llieir thnnder-sinick eyes make them fancy they have put out the sun ; they have won the day, have cleared the field, and are absolute victors ; they have vanquished the whole })ower of their most dreaded enemy, the light that reveals God in his works — after all this, without any inducement at all, and having triumphed over every thing that looked like an argument to prove it, they vouchsafe to say however, of their own accord. There is a God. Surely if this have any design at all, it must be a very bad one. And see whither it tends. They have now a god of their own making; and all the being he hath, depends upon their grace and favour. They are not his creatures, but he is theirs ; a precarious deity, that shall be as long, and what, and where, they please to have him. And if he displease them, they can think him back into nothing. Here seems the depth of the design. For see with what cautions and limitations they admit him into being. There shall be a god, provided he be not meddlesome, nor concern himself in their affairs to the crossing of any inclinations of humours which they are pleased shall command and govern their lives ; being con- scious that if they admit of any at all that shall have to do with their concernments, he cannot but be such as the ways they resolve on will displease. Their very shame will not permit them to call that God, which if" he take any cognizance at all of their course will not dislike it. And herein that they may be the more secure, they judge it the most prudent course, not to allow him anypart or interest in the affairs of the world at all. Yet all this while they court him at a great rate, and all religion is taken away under pretence of great piety : Avor- ship they believe he cares not for, because he is full and needs nothing. In this Avorld he must not be, for it is a place unworthy of him. He must have had no hand in framing, nor can they think fit he should have anv in the government of it. For it would be a great disturbance to him, and interrupt his pleasures. The same thing as if certain licentious cour.tiers, impatient of being governed, should address themselves to their prince in such a form of speech, that it is beneath him to receive any homage from them, it would too much debase majesty ; that his dominions afford no place fit for his residence, and there- fore it would be convenient for him to betake himself into some other country, that hath better air and accommoda- tion for delight; that diadems and sceptres are burthen- some things, which therefore if he will quit to them, he may wholly give up himself to ease and pleasure. Yea, and whatsoever would any way tend to evince his necessary existence, is with the same courtship laid aside ; (although if he do not exist necessarily .and of himself, he cannot have any existence at all ; for as they do not allow him to be the cause of any thing, so they assign nothing to be the cause of him ;) that is, with pretence there is no need it should be demonstrated, because all men believe it without a reason, nature having impressed this belief upon the minds of all ; or (which is all one) they having agreed to believe it because they believe. But though diey have no reason to believe a Deity, they have a very good one why they would seem to do so, that they may expiate with the people their irreligion by a collusive pre- tending against atheism. And because'they think it less plausible plainly to deny there is a God, they therefore grant one to please the vulgar, yet take care it shall be one as good as none, lest otherwise they should displease themselves : and so their credit and their liberty are both cared for together. V. But this covering is too short, and the art by which they would fit it to their design, when it should cheat others, deceives themselves. For it is most evident, 3. That the being with the pretended belief whereof they would mock the world, is no God ; and that conse- quently, while they would seem to acknowledge a deity, they really acknowledge none at all. Our contest hath not, all this while, been a strife about words, or con- cerning the name, but the thing itself And not whe- ther there be such a thing in being to which that name may, with whatsoever impropriety, be given, but whether h OffOl ucv ovv Ta; nOcovi aoKovat rtiXoaociiaf, &e. D. Halicamass. Ant. Rom. I. i See their ambassador's oration, in Q Curtius. there be such a being as whereto it properly belongs : supposing, and taking for granted as a matter out of qiies- tion, that (even in their own sense) if such a being as we have described do exist, it is most properly God ; and that they will not go about to call it by another name ; or that they will not pretend this name agrees to any other thing so fitly as to him. And because we have already proved this Being doth exist, and that there can be but one such, it plainly follows theirs is in propriety of speech (even though he did exist) no God ; and that much less should he appropriate the name, and exclude the only true God. For since the high and dignifying eulogies, which they are wont to bestow upon their feigned deity, do plainly show they would have it thought they esteem him the most ex- cellent of all existent beings; if we have proved a really existent Being to be more excellent than he, it is evident, even upon their own grounds, that this is God. Hither the Deity must be deferred, and theirs must yield, and give out ; inasmuch as we cannot suppose them so void of common sense, as to say the less excellent being is God, and the more excellent is no God. But if they should be so, (whereas the controversy is not about the name,) we have our main purpose, in having proved there is a Being actually existent, that hath all the real excellences which they ascribe to their deities, and infinitely more. And as concerning the name, who made them dictators to all the world, and the sole judges of the propriety of words 1 or with what right or pretence will they assume so much to themselves, so as, against the rest of the world, to name that God, from which they cut off the principal perfections wont to be signified by that name 1 And if we speak of .such perfections as tend to infer and establish religion and providence, who but themselves, did ever call that God in the eminent sense, that they supposed could not hear prayers, and thereupon dispense favours, relieve the afflict- ed, supply the indigent, and receive suitable acknowledg- ments 1 They indeed (saith a famed writerii of Roman history) that exercise themselves in the atheistical sorts of philosophy, {if we may call that philosophy,) as they are wont to jeer at all appearances of tlie gods, whether a,mong the Greeks or the JBarbarians, will make themselves matter of laughter of our histories, not thinking that any God takes care of any man. — Let the story he there tells shift for itself; in the meantime it appears they escaped not the infamy of atheists, who (whatever deities they might imagine be- sides) did deny God's presence, and regard to men. Which sort of persons he elsewhere of ten animadverts upon. But do we need to insist, that all the rest of the world acknowledged no gods, whom they did not also worship 1 What meant their temples and altars, their prayers and sacrifices 1 Or did they take him for God, whom they believed to take no care of them, or from whom they expected no advantage 1 Even the barbarous Scy- thians themselves vmderstood it most inseparable to belong to a deity, to be beneficent; when they upbraidingly tell Alexander,! That if he were a god, (as they it seems had heard he vogued himself) he should bestow benefits upon men, and not take from them Avhat was their own. And by the way, it is observable how contradictious and repugnant the Epicurean sentiments arc in this, even to themselves : that speaking of friendship, u (of which they say many generous and brave things,) they gallantly pro- fess (as Plutarch testifies of them) that it is a more pleasant thing to benefit others than to receive benefits oneself. They yet, while they seem so greatly concernedi that their gods be every way most perfectly happy, deny to them this highest and most excellent part of felicity. That a virtuous man may a great deal more benefit the world than they, and consequently have more pure and lively relishes of a genuine and refined pleasure. Upon the whole, it is manifest they so maim the notion of God, as to make it quite another thing. And if they think to wipe off' any thing of the foul and odious blot wherewith their avowed irreligion hath stained their name and memory, by the acknowledgment of such a God ; they effect the like thing by it, and gain as much to the repu- tation of their piety as he should of his loyalty, who being k Lib. lion posse suav-iter \\\i, &c. 1 Vid. et lib. maxime cum oriiicip. viris Pliil. &c. Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 49 accused of treason against his prince, shall think to vindi- cate himseli' by professing solemnly to own the king ; provided you only mean by it the king of clubs, or any such painted one the pack affords. But here it may be demanded. Is every misapprehension of God to be under- stood as a denial of his being 1 If so, whom can we un- dertake to assoil of atheism'? Or who can certainly acquit himself 1 For how impossible is it to be sure we have no untrue conception of a Being so infinitely, by our own confession, above ail our thoughts'? Or how is it to be avoided, in somewhat or other, to think amiss of so lui- known and incomprehensibly excellent a Being, either by detracting somewhat that belongs to it, or attributing somewhat that belongs not ] And since many, we are sure, have thought and spoken unworthily of God, besides Epicureans, are all these logo into the account of atheists'? Or whereas it is commonly wont to be said. Whatsoever is in God, is God: how can they who deny any thing of him, which is really in him, be excused of denying his whole being'? Or where will we fix the bounds of our censure'? Many things should be said (if we will speak at all) to so manifold an inquiry: but it belongs not to the design of this discourse to examine and discuss all men's senti- ments of God that have been exposed to the view of the world, or arbitrate among the dissenting parties; much less to explain or abet every school-maxim that hath refer- ence to this theme; the authors or lovers whereof will be sufficiently prompted by their own genius to do at least as much as can be requisite herein. But whatever the real sameness is supposed to be, of the things attributed to God, it is acknowledged we cannot but conceive of them as divers; and so that our conception of any one is not adequate to the entire object, which is confessed incom- prehensible. Yet any one attribute gives a true notion of the object, so far as it reaches, though not a full. As I may be said truly to see a man, when I only see his face, and view not every part and limb; or to know him, while }'et I have not had opportunity to discern everj^ quality in his temper, and what his dispositions and inclinations, in all respects, are. Moreover, it's one thing to deny any divine perfection, another, only not to know it. And such mere nescience is so far from being guilty of the horrid crime of atheism, that it's not so much as cul- pable, further than as it is obstinatelj'' persisted in, against sufficient evidence: for we are not obliged to know everj' thing, but what is to us knowable, and what we are con- cerned to know. Again, (and which is most considerable to our purpose,) we are not concerned to know what God is in himself, otherwise than as we may thereby knoM' what he is in relation to us, viz. as he is the Author of our beings, the Governor of our lives and actions, and thereupon the object of our religion; for a religious respect unto him is the very end of that knowledge. Now, if any other than that sort of persons we oppose have taken up apprehensions of him not so suitable to that end, it were to be wished they saw it, and would unthink all those thoughts. But surely, they who must professedly contend against the very notions themselves which directly influ- ence all our practice toward God, so considered," would suggest such as are wholly inconsistent therewith ; who oppose the knowledge of God to the end of that know- ledge, and do not merely mistake the way to that end while they are aiming at it, but most avowedly resist and disclaim the end itself; are to be distinguished from them who professedly intend that same end, only see not wherein their misapprehension are prejudical and repugnant to it; otherwise are ready to reject them. And the former are therefore most justly to be singled out, and designed the objects of our direct opposition. Nor are they so fitly to be opposed under any other notion, as that of atheists. For since our knowledge of God ought chiefly to respect him in that fore-mentioned relative consideration, and the inquiry, What is God 1 signifies, as it concerns us, What is the object of religion'? they denying any such thing, deny there is a God. Nor do they "deny him in that re- lative consideration only; but (as every relation is founded in somewhat that is absolute) the very reason of their denying him so, is, that they deny in him those absolute and positive perfections that render him such; as certain of those do, that have been proved to belong to him. Which is that we have next to consider, viz. VI. That it may evidently be deduced from what hath been said, tending to prove those things of God which are included in the notion of him, and from that notion itself, that he is such as can converse with men. That is, having proved — That there is an eternal, self-subsisting, inde- pendent, necessary Being, of so great activity, life, power, wisdom, and goodness, as to have been the Maker of this world: and by this medium — That we see this world is in being, which otherwise could never have been, much less such as we see it is: it therefore follows, that this great Creator can have influence upon the creatures he hath made, in a way suitable to their natures. It follows, I say, from the same medium, (the present visible existence of this world, which could not olher^vise be now in being,) that he can thus have influence upon his creatures: for it is hence manifest that he hath; they depend on him, and are sustained by him; nor could more subsist by them- selves, than they could make themselves, or of themselves have sprung out of nothing. And if it were possible they could, being raised up into being, continue in being of themselves; yet since our present question is not concern- ing what they need, but what God can do; and our ad- versaries in the present cause do not (as hath been noted) upon any other pretence deny that he doth concern him- self in the affairs of the vmiverse,but that he cannot; (that is, that it consists not with his felicity, and he cannot be happy;) is it not plain that he can with the .same facility continue the influence which he at first gave forth, and with as little prejudice to his felicity'? For if it be neces- sary to him to be happy, or impossible not to be so, he must be ever so. His happiness was not capable of being discontinued, so long as while he made the world, settled the several orders and kinds, and formed the first indi- viduals of every kind of creatures. Therefore having done this, and without diminution to his happiness, Avas it a more toilsome and less tolerable labour to keep things as they were, than to make them so 1 If it was, (which no man that understands common sense would say,) surely that blind thing which they more blindly call nahtre, (not understanding or being able to tell what they mean by it,) and would have be the only cause of all things, acting at first to the uttermost, and having noway to recruit its vigour and reinforce itself, its labour and business being so much increased, and jaded and grown weary ; had given out, and patiently suffered all things to dissolve and re- lapse into the old chaos long ago. But if the labour was not greater, to continue things in the state wherein they were made, than to make them; surely a wise, intelligent Deity, which we have proved made them, could as w'ell sustain them, being made, as their brutal (and as unintel- ligible as unintelligent) nature do both. So much then of intercourse God could have with hi.s creatures, as his continual communication of his influence to be received by them amounts to. And then man, not be- ing excluded their number, must share in this possible privilege according to the capacity' of his nature. And inas- much as we have also proved more particularly concerning man, that he immediately owes the peculiar excellences of his intelligent nature, as it's .such, to God only; it is apparently consequent, that having formed this his more excellent creature, according to his own more express likeness, stamjied it M-ith the glorious characters of his living image, ijiven it a nature suitable to his own, and thereby made it capable of rational and intelligent converse with him; he hath it ever in his power to maintain a con- tinual converse with this creature, by agreeable communi- cations; by letting; in upon it the vital beams and influ- ences of his own lijjht and love, and receiving back the return of its grateful acknowledgments and praises. Wherein it's manifest he should do no greater thing than he hath done : for who sees not, that it is a matter of no greater diflSculiy to converse with, than to make a reason- able creature'? Or who would not be ashamed to deny, that he who hath been the only Author of the soul of man, and of the excellent powers and faculties belonging to it, can more easily sustain what he hath made, and converse with that his creature, suitably to the way wherein he hath made it capable of his converse '? Whereto the consider- 50 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I. ation being added of his gracious nature, (manifested in this creation itself,) it is farther evident, that he is (as things are now ordered, whereof more hereafter) not only able, but apt and ready, to converse with men, in such a way as shall tend to the improving of their being unto that blessedness whereof he hath made them naturally capable; if their own voluntary alienation and aversion to him (yet not overcome) do not obstruct the way of that intercourse. And even this were sufficient to give foundation to a tem- ple, and both afford encouragement and infer an obligation to religion ; although no other perfection had been, or conid be, demonstrated of the Divine Being, than what is immediately to be collected from his works, and the things whereof he hath been the sole and most arbitrary Author. For what if no more were possible to be proved, have we not, even by thus much, a representation of an object suf- ficiently worthy of our homage and adoration 1 He that could make and sustain such a Avorld as this, how inex- pressibly doth he surpass in greatness the most excellent of all mortal creatures! to some or other of whom, upon some (merely accidental) dignifying circumstances, we justly esteem ourselves to owe a dutiful observance and subjection. If he did not comprehend within his own being simply all perfection; if there were many gods and worlds besides, and he only the Creator and absolute Lord of our vortex; were not that enough to entitle him to all the obedience and service we could give him, and enable him suf- ficient h^ to reward it, and render hispresence and cherishing influences (which he could every where diffuse within this circle, and limited portion of the universe) even infinitely covetable and desirable to US'? Yea, if he were the only entire Author of our own particular being, how much more is that, than the partial, subordinate interest of a human parent, to whom (as even an Epicurean would confess) nature itself urges and exacts a duly, the refusal whereof even barbarian ingenuity would abhor, yea and brutal instinct condemn 1 How much greater and more absolute is the right which the parentage ofour whole being challenges! If every man were created by a several god, whose creative power were confined to only one such creature, and each one were the solitary product and the charge of an appropriate deity, whose dominion the state of things would allow to be exteirded so far only, and no further; were there therefore no place left for religion, or no tie unto love, reverence, obedience, and adoration, because the author of my being comprehended not in himself all perfection, when as yet he comprehended so much as to be the sole cause of all that is in me; and his power over me, and his goodness to me, are hereby sup- posed the same which the only one God truly hath and exerciseth towards all 1 If all that I am and have be for him, I cannot surely owe to him less than all. Such as have either had, or supposed themselves to have, their particular tutelary ^'f wit, (of whom there will be more occasion to take notice hereafter,) though they reckoned them but a sort of deputed or vicarious deities, underling gods, whom they never accounted the causes of their being; yet how have they coveted and gloried to open their breasts to become their temples, and entertain the converse of those supposed divine inhabitants! If thcv had taken one of these to be their alone creator, how much greater had their veneration and their homage been ! This, it may be hoped, will be thought sufficiently proved in this discourse, (at least to have been so by some or other,) that we are not of ourselves; and that our extraction is to be fetched higher than from matter, or from only human progenitors. Nothing that is terrene and mortal could be the author of such powers as we find in ourselves; we are most certainly the offspring of some or other deity. And he that made us, knows us thoroughly, can apply himself inwardly to us, receive our addresses and ap- plication, our acknowledgments and adoration; where- unfo we should have, even upon these terms, great and manifest obligation, although nothing more of the excel- lency and perfection of our Creator were certainly known tons. VII. But it hath been further shown. That the neces- sary Being from whence we .sprang, is also an absolutely and infinitely perfect Being: — That necessary Being can- not be less perfect, than to include the entire and inei- haustible fulness of all being and perfection: — That therefore the God to whom this notion belongs, must con- sequently be every way sufficient to all, and be himself but one; the only Source and Fountain of all life and being; the common Basis and Support of the universe; the absolute Lord of this great creation, and the central Object of the common concurrent trust, fear, love, and other Avorship of his intelligent and reasonable creatures. And therefore there remains no greater or other difficulty, in apprehending how he can, without disturbance to him- self or interruption of his own felicity, intend all the concernments of his creatures, apply himself to them ac- cording to their several exigences, satisfy their desires and cravings, inspect and govern their actions and affairs ; than we have to apprehend a Being absolutely and every way perfect. Whereof if we cannot have a distinct apprehen- sion all at once, i. e. though we cannot comprehend every particular perfection of God in the same thought, (as our eye cannot behold, at one view, every part of an over-large olDJect, unto which, however, part by part, it may be suc- cessively applied,) we can yet in the general apprehend him absolutely perfect; or such to whom, we are sure, no perfection is Avanting: and can successively contemplate this or that, as we are occasionally led to consider them : and can answer to ourselves difficulties that occur to us, with this easy, sure, and ever ready solution; That he can do all things; that nothing is too hard for him; that he is full, all-sufficient, and every way perfect. Whereof we are the more confirmed, that we find we cannot, by the utmost range of our most enlarged thoughts, ever reach any bound or end of that perfection, which yet we must conclude is necessarily to be attributed to an absolutely perfect Being. And this we have reason to take for a \'ery sufficient answer to any doubt that can arise, concerning the possibility of his converse with us ; unless we will be so unreasonable as to pretend, that what is brought for sohdion. hath greater difficulty in it than the doubt; or that because we cannot apprehend at once infinite perfection, therefore it cannot be; Avhich Avere as much as to say, that it cannot be because it is infinite ; for it were not infinite, if we could distinctly apprehend it. And so were to make it a reason against itself, which is most injuriously and Avith no pretence attempted, except we could shoAv an inconsistency in the terms; which it is plain we can never do, and should most idly attempt. And it were to make our present apprehension the measure of all reality, against our experience; which (if our indulgence to that self- magnifying conceit do not suspend our further inquiries and researches) would daily bring to our notice things we had no apprehension of before. It were (instead of that just and laudable ambition of becoming ourselves like God, in his imitable perfections) to make him like ourselves ; the true model of the Epicurean deity. Nor can any thing be more easy, than that wherein we pretend so great a difficulty; that is, to apprehend some- Avhat may be more perfect than we can apprehend. What else but proud ignorance can hinder us from seeing, that the more we knoAV, the more there is that we knoAv not ? How often are we outdone by creatures of our own order in the creation ! How many men are there Avhom we are daily constrained to admire, as unspeakably excelling us, and Avhom Ave cannot but acknowledge to be far more knowing, discerning, apprehensive of things, of more composed minds, of more penetrating judgments, of more quick and nimble Avits, easily turning themselves to great variety of objects and affairs without distrac- tion and confusion, of more equal and dispassionate tempers, less liable to commotion and disturbance, than ourselves. HoAv absurd and senseless a pretence is it against the thing itself, that Ave cannot apprehend an infinite perfection in one common fountain of all perfection; or because we cannot go through a multitude of businesses without dis- traction, that therefore he that made us and all thing can- not. If we Avould make ourselves the measure, it is likely we should confess Ave are outstripped, Avhen we are told that Julius Cajsar could dictate letters, when he was intent upon the greatest affairs, to four (and if he had nothing else to diA'ert him, to scA'en) secretaries at once ; that Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 51 Cyrusm could call by name all the soldiers in his numerous army: with divers "other strange instances of like nature. And since the perfections of some so far exceed the measure of the most, why is it then unconceivable that divine perfec- tion should so far surpass all, as that God may intend the affairs of the world, according to the several exigences of his creatures, without any ungrateful diversion to himself, or diminution to his felicity"? And since they who partake of some, and but a small portion of perfection only, can be concerned in many affairs, with little trouble; why cannot he that comprehends all perfection, be concerned in all, without any 1 For though we have, in what hath been last said, endeavoured to represent it as not so unap- prehensible as is pretended, that it may be also ; we take it, in the meantime, as formerly sufficiently proved, that so it is ; that God is a being absolutely perfect, or that in- cludes eminently all perfection in himself. VIII. Which general perfection of his being, as it mo- difies all his attributes, so we shall particularly take notice that it doth so as to those that have a more direct influence upon, and tend more fully to evince, his conversableness with men. As, first, his wisdom and knowledge (for we need not to be so curious as at present to distinguish them) must be omniscient. About which, if any place were left for rational doubt, it would be obvious to them to allege it who are of slower inclinations towards religion ; and ob- ject, (against all applications to, or expectations from, him,) that if we be not sure he knows simply all things, so as wisely to consider them and resolve fitly about them, it will be no little difficulty to determine which he doth, and which not ; or to be at a certainty, that this or that con- cernment of theirs, about which they might address them- selves to him, be not among the unknown things. At least, we shall the less need to be curious in distinguish- ing, or to consider what things may be supposed rather than other, to be without the compass of his knowledge ; if it appear that it universally encompasses all things, or that nothing can be without its reach. And because we suppose it already out of doubt, that the true notion of God imports a Being absolutely or every way perfect; nothing else can be doubted in this matter, but whether the knowledge of all things be a perfection. The greatest difficulty that hath troubled some in this matter, hath been, How it is possible there should be any certain knowledge of eventsyetto come, that depend upon a free and self-determining cause 1 But methinks we should not make a difficulty to acknowledge, that to know these things, imports greater perfection than not to know them ; and then it would be very unreasonable, because we cannot show how this or that thing was per- formed which manifestly is done, therefore to deny that it is done at all. It would be so highly unreasonable to conclude against any act of God, from our ignorance of the manner of it, that we should reckon it very absurd to con- clude so, concerning any act of our own, or our ability thereto. What if it were hitherto an unknown thing, and impossible to be determined, how the act of vision is per- formed by us; were it a wise conclusion, that therefore we neither do nor can see 1 How much more rash and pre- suming a confidence were it to reason thus concerning. the divine acts and perfections ! Would we not in any such case be determined rather by thkt which is more evident, than b}'' what is more obscure 1 As in the assigned in- stance, we should have but these two propositions to compare — That I do (or have such a perfection belonging to me that I can) see, and, — That whatsoever act I do or can do, I am able to understand the course and method of nature's operations therein — and thereupon to judge which of these two is more evident. Wherein it may be supposed there is no man in his wits, to whom the deter- mination would not be easy. Accordingly, in the present case we have only these two assertions that can be in com- petition, in point of evidence, between which we are to make a comparison, and a consequent judgment ; viz. — Whatsoever perfection belongs -to a being absolutely per- fect, enabling it to do this or that, the wit of man can com- prehend the distinct way and manner of doing it; and, — m Plin. Nat. Hist. lib. 7. c. 2.5. Id. 1. 7. c. 24. vid. pt Xenonh. de C>T Ps'd. I. .'5. Who, thou'-'h he expressly s^vs he knew all tlie PoUlicrs' name?, but seems ratlierto mean it of their oiricers, (for, saith he, he reckoned it an ab- It imports greater perfection to know all things, than to be ignorant of some — and here .surely whosoever shall think the determination difficult, accounts the wit of man so exceeding great, that he discovers his own to be very little. For what can the pretence of evidence be in the former assertion 1 Was it necessary that he, in whose choice it was whether we should ever knowany thing or no, should make us capable of knowing every thing belonging to his own being? Or will we adventure to be so assuming, as while we deny it to God that he knows all things, to attri- bute to ourselves that we dol But if we will think it not altogether unworthy of us to be ignorant of something, what is there of which we may with more probability, or with less disparagement be thought so, than the manner of God's knowing things'! And what place is there for com- plaint of inevidence in the latter 1 Is not that knowledge more perfect, which so fully already comprehends all things, as upon that account to admit of no increase; than that which shall be every day growing, and have a continual .succession of new objects emerging and coming into view before altogether unknown 1 And will not that be the case, if we suppose future contingencies to lie concejaled from the penetrating eye of God 1 For whatsoever is fu- ture, will some time be ])resent, and then we will allow such contingencies to be known to him. That is, that God may know them, when we ourselves can; and that nothing of that kind is k-nown to him, which is not know- able some way or other to ourselves, at least successively, and one thing" after another. We will perhaps allow that prerogative to God, in point of this knowledge, that he can know these things now fallen out, all at once ; ice, but by degrees ; while yet there is not any one that is ab- solutely unknowable to us. But why should it be thought unreasonable, to attribute an excellency to the knowledge of God above ours; as well in respect of the manner of knowing, as the multitude of objects at once known 1 We will readily confess, in some creatures, an excellency of their visive faculty above our own ; that they can see things in that darkness, wherein they are to us invisible. And will we not allow that to the eye of God, which is as aflame of fire, to be able to penetrate into the abstrusest darkness of futurity, though we know not the way how it is done ; when yet we know that whatsoever belongs to the most perfect being, must belong to his 1 And that knowledge of all things imports more perfection, than if it were lessened by the ignorance of an}' thing. Some, who have thought the certain foreknowledge of future contingencies not attributable to God, have reckoned the matter sufficiently excused by this. That it no more detracts from the divine omniscience, to state without the object of it things not possible, or that imply a contradic- tion (as thev suppose these do) to be known ; than it doth from his ornnipotency, that it cannot do what is impossi- ble, or that implies" a contradiction to be done. But against this there seems to lie this reasonable exception, that the two ca.ses appear not sufficiently alike ; inasmuch as the supposition of the former will be found not to leave the blessed God equally entitled to omnisciency, as the latter to omnipotencv. For all things should not be alike the object of both ; "and why should not that he under- stood to signify the knou-lcdsc of simply all things, as well as this\\\e pov'cr of doins simply all things 7 Or why should all thiiifis, included in these two words, signify so very diversely; that is, there properly all things, here some things only? And why must we so difference the object of omnisciency and ornnipotency, as to make that so much narrower than this? And then how is it all things, when so great a number of things will be left excluded ? Whereas from the object of ornnipotency (that we may prevent what would be replied) there will be no exclusion of any thing: not of the things which are actually already made ; for they are still momently reproduced by the same power: not of the actions and effects of free causes yet future; for, when they become actual, Gxid doth certainly perform the part of the first cause, (even by common con- sent,) in e,-der to their becoming so; which is certainly doing somewhat, though all be not agreed what that part surd thine a meohanic should know the names of all his tools. 4:c. and a ge- neral not know the names of his captains under him. Sic.) ret he amtb the sol- diers wondered -ojj oi'oa^i^iM ti'trcXX^ro. 52 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I, is. Therefore they are, in the meantime, to be esteemed within the object of omnipotency, or to be of the things which God can do ; viz. as the first cause virtually in- cluding the power of the second. But more strictly ; all impossibility is either natural and absolute, or moral and conditional. AVhat is absolutely or naturally impossible, or repugnant in itself, is not properly any thing. What- soever simple being, not yet existent, we can form any conception of, is producible, and so within the compass of omnipotency; for there is no repugnancy in simplicity. That wherein therefore we place natural impossibility, is the inconsistency of being this thing, whose notion is such ; and another, wholly and entirely, whose notion is diverse, at the same time, that which (more barbarously than insig- nificantly) hath been wont to be called incompnssibility. But surely all things are properly enough said to be natu- rally possible to God, while all simple beings are produci- ble by him, of which any notion can be formed; yea, and compounded, so as by their composition to result into a third thing. So that it is not an exception, to say that it is naturally impossible this thing should be another thing, and yet be wholly itself still at once ; that it should be and not be, or be without itself There is not within the compass of actual or conceivable being, such a thing. Nor is it reasonable to except such actions as are naturally pos- sible to other agents, but not to him ; as to walk, for in- stance, or the like. Inasmuch as, though the excellency of his nature permits not they should be done by him, yet since their power of doing them proceeds wholly from him, he hath it virtually and eminently in himself: as was for- merly said of the infiniteness of his being. And for moral impossibility, as to lie, to do an unjust act ; that God never does them, proceeds not from want of power, but an eter- nal aversion of will. It cannot be said he is not able to do such a thing, if he would; but so is his will qualified and conditioned, by its own unchangeable rectitude, that he most certainly never will; or such things as are in themselves evil are never done by him, not through the defect of natural power, but from the permanent stability and fulness of all moral perfection. And it is not without the compass of absolute omnipotency to do what is but conditionally impossible, that absence of which restrictive condition would rather bespeak impotenc}^ and imperfec- tion, than omnipotency. Therefore the object of omnipo- tence is simply all things ; why not of omniscience as well 1 It may be said, all things, as it signifies the object of omniscience, is only restrained by the act or faculty, signified therewith in the same Avord, so as to denote the formal object of that faculty or act, mz. all knowable things. But surely that act must suppose some agent, whereto that knowable hath reference. Knowable ! To whom? To others, or to God himself ? If we say the former, it is indeed a great honour we put upon God, to say he can know as much as others; if the latfter, we speak absurdly, and only say he can know^ all that he can know. It were fairer to deny omniscience than so inter- pret it. But if it be denied, what shall the pretence bel Why, that it implies a contradiction future contingents should be certainly known ; for they are uncertain, and nothing can be otherwise truly known than as it is." And it must be acknowledged, that to whom any thing is uncertain, it is a contradiction that to him it should be certainly known. But that such things are uncertain to God, needs other proof than I have met with, in Avhat fol- lows in that cited author, or elsewhere : all which will amount to no more than this, that such things as w-e can- not tell how God knows them, must needs be unknown to him. But since we are sure many such things have been certainly foretold by God, (and of them such as we may be also sure he never intended to effect,) we have reason enough to be confident that such things are not unknow- able to him. And for the manner of his knowing them, it is better to profess ignorance about it, than attempt the explication thereof, either unintelligibly, as some have to no purpose, or dangerously and impiously, as others have adventured to do to very bad jm-rpose. And it well be- comes us to suppose an infinite understanding may have n ftiinlis res est talis est roi cosiiitio. Si itaoue res sit inccrta (piita Incer- iuiii est lioo ne sit fiituniin, an non) non datur ulla certa ejus notitia. Quo- nrt/^lo eniin fieri potest uf certo soiatur adfore, quod certo futururn tion est, &c. ways of knowing things which we know nothing of. To my apprehension, that last-mentioned author doth with ill success attempt an explication of God's manner of know- ing this sort of things, by the far less intelligible notion of the indivisibility of eternity, comprehending (as he says) all the parts of time, not successively, but together. And though he truly say that the Scotists' way of expressing how future contingents are present to God, i. e. according to their objective and intentional being only, affords us no account why God knows them, (for which cause he rejects it, and follows that of the I'homists, who will have them to be present according to their real and actual existence,) I should yet prefer the deficiency of the former way, be- fore the contradictiousness and repugnancy of the latter ; and conceive those words in the Divine Dialogues^ as good an explication of the manner of his knoAvledge, as the case can admit, (which yet is but the Scotists' sense,) "That the whole evolution of times and ages is so collect- edly and presentificly represented to God at once, as if all things and actions which ever were, are, or shall be, w-ere at this very in.stant, and so always really present and ex- istent before him." Which is no wonder the animadver- sion and intellectual comprehension of God being abso- lutely infinite, according to the truth of his idea. I do therefore think upon a sober resolution in this matter, " That it seems more safe to allow this privilege to the in- finite understanding of God,P than to venture at all to cir- cumscribe his omniscience : for though it may safely be said that he knows not any thing that really implies a contradiction to be known, yet we are not assured but that may seem a contradiction to us, that is not so really in itself." And when we have only human wit to contest with in the case, reverence of this or that man, though both in great vo^ue in that kind, needs not restrain us from distinguishing Detwcen a mere seeming latent contradic- tion, and a flat, downright, open one. Only as to that instance of the commensiirableness of the diagonal lineol a quadrate to one of the sides ; w^hereas though there are great difficulties on both sides, viz. that these are com- mensurable, and that they are not ; yet any man's judg- ment would rather incline to the latter, as the easier part : I should therefore also think it more safe to make choice of that, as the parallel of the present difficulty. Upon the whole, we may conclude that the knowledge of God is every way perfect ; and being so, extends to all our con- cernments: and that nothing remains, upon that account, to make us decline applying ourselves to religious con- verses with him, or deny him the honour and entertain- ment of a temple: for which we shall yet see further cause, when we consider, next, IX. That his power is also omnipotent. Which (though the discourse of it have been occasionally somewhat min- gled with that of the last) might be directly spoken of for the fuller eviction of that his conversableness with men, which religion and a temple do suppose. Nor indeed is it enough that he knows our concernments, except he can also provide effectually about them, and dispose of them to our advantage. And we cannot doubt but he, who could create us and su<;h a world as this, can do so, even thaugh he were supposed not omnipotent. But even that itself seems a very unreasonable supposition, that less than infinite power should suffice to the creation of any thing. For however liable it may be to controversy, what a second cause might do herein, being assisted by the infinite power of the first; it seems altogether tmimaginable to us, how, though the power of all men were met in one, (which we can easily suppose to be a very vast power,) it could alone be sufficient to make the minutest atom arise into being out of nothing. And that all the matter of the universe hath been so produced, %nz. out of nothing, it will be no great presumption to suppose already fully proved ; in that though any such thing as necessary matter were admitted, yet its essential unalterableness would render it impossible it should be the matter of the universe. Therefore when we cannot devise what finite power can ever suffice (sup- pose it were never so much fncreased, but still finite) to the doing of that which we are sure is done, what is left —Strangiiis de. Votuntate et Jctionihvs Dei, chiefly intend. And for the forvier, I would inquire, Is amplitude of essence no perfection'? Or were the confining of this Being to the very minutest space we can imagine, no de- traction fi-om the perfection of ill What if the amplitude of that glorious and ever-blessed Essence were said to be only of that extent (may it be spoken with all reverence, and resentment of the unhappy necessit)- we have ofma- % Both in his Dialogues and Enchiridion Metaphya. 54 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Fatit I. king so mean a supposition) as to have been confined unto that one temple to which of old he chose to confine his more solemn worship ; that he could be essentially pre- sent, only here at once, and no where else; were $his no detraction 1 They that think him only to replenish and be present by his essence in the highest heaven, (as some are wont to speak,) would they not confess it were a meaner and much lower thought to suppose that presence circum- scribed within the so unconceivably narrower limits as the walls of a house 1 If they would pretend to ascribe to him some perfection beyond this, by supposing his essen- tial presence commensurable to the vaster territory of the highest heavens; even by the same supposition, should they deny to him greater perfection than they ascribe. For the perfection which in this kind they should ascribe, vf eve finite only; but that which they should deny, were infinite. Again, they will however acknowledge omnipotency a perfection included in the notion of an absolutely perfect Being; therefore they will grant, he can create another world (for they do not pretend to believe this infinite; and if they did, by their supposition, they should give away their cause) at any the greatest distance we can conceive from this ; therefore so far his power can extend itself But what, his power without his being? What then is his power 1 something, or nothing:'? Nothing can do no- thing ; therefore not make a world. It is then some be- ing; and whose being is it but his own? Is it a created beingl That is to suppose him, first, impotent, and then to have created omnipotency, when he could do nothing. "Whence by the way we may see to how little purpose that distinction can be applied in the present case of essen- tial and virtual contact, where the essence and virtue can- not but be the same. But shall it be said, he must, in order to the creating such another world, locally move thither where he designs if? I ask then. But can he not at the same time create thousands of worlds at any dis- tance from this round about it ? No man can imagine this to be impossible to him that can do all things. Where- fore of such extent is his power, and consequently his bemg. Will they therefore say he can immensely, if he please, diffuse his being, but he voluntarily contracts it 1 It is answered, Tliai is altogether impossible to a being, that is whatsoever it is by a simple and absolute necessity, for whatsoever it is necessarily, it is unalterably and eter- nally, or is pure act, and in a possibility to be nothing which it already is not. Therefore since God can every where exert his power, he is necessarily, already, every where : and hence, God's immensity is the true reason of his immobility; there being no imaginable space, which he doth not necessarily replenish. Whence also, the sup- position of his being so confined (as was said) is imme- diately repugnant to the notion of a necessary being, as well as of an absolutely perfect, which hath been argued from It. We might moreover add, that upon the same supposition God might truly be said to have made a crea- ture greater than himself, (for such this universe apparently were,) and that he can make one (as they must confess who deny him not to be omnipotent) most unconceivably greater than this imi verse now is. Nothing therefore seems more manifest than that God is immense, or (as we may express it) extrinsically infinite, with respect to place ; as well as intrinsically, in resj>ect to the plenitude of his perfection. Only it may be requisite to consider briefly what is said against it by the otherwise minded, that pre- tend not to deny his infinity in that other sense. Wherein that this discourse swell not beyond just bounds, their strength of argument, (for it will "not l>e so seasonable here to discuss with them the texts of Scripture wont to be in- sisted on in this matter,) shall be viewed as it is collected and gathered up in one of them. And that shall be,Cur- cellagHS,^ who gives it as succinctly and fully as any I have met with of that sort of men. The doctrine itself we may take from him thus, First, On the negative part, by way of denial of what we have been hitherto asserting, he says, " The foundation," (that s De Vocibus Trinit. Ac. t Unto which purpose speaks at large Volkelius de vera Relig. Quia ^Ji i,^Lf,J,' ^^-^''^ et sapientia ad res omnes extenditur, uti et potestas riht *l ;^' ^"^?? "^^^^l P™?ens ommaque numine euo complere di- citiur, &c. I. J. c. 27. Slichwi^iu-s Artie, de JUio Dei. Ad P» I3i» 6 7 is, of a distinction of Maresius's to which he is replying, for so occasionally comes in the discourse,) "viz. the in- finity of the divine essence, is not so firm as i.s commonly thought." And that therefore it may be thought less firm, he thinks fit to cast a slur upon it, by making it the doc- trine of the Stoics, exprest by "Virgil, Jori$ omnia plena ; (as if it must needs be false, because Virgil said it, though I could tell, if it were worth the while, where "Virgil speaks more agreeably to his sense than ours, according to which he might as well have interpreted this passage, as divers texts of Scripture ; and then his authority might have been of some value;) and by Lucan, who helps, it seems, to disgrace and spoil it; Jupiter est quodcnnque vides, quocunqize meveris. He might, if he had a mind to make it thought paganish, have quoted a good many more, but then there might have been some danger it should pass for a common notion. Next, he quotes some passages of the fathers that import dislike of it, about which we need not concern oirrselves ; for the question is not what this or that man thought. And then, for the positive account of his own judgment in the case, having recited divers texts out of the Bible that seemed as he appre- hended to make against him, he would have us believe, that these all speak rather of God's providence and power, by which he concerns himself in all our works, words, and thoughts, wheresoever we live, than of the absolute infinity of his essence.! And afterwards, That God is by his es- sence in the supreme heaven, where he inhabits the inac- cessible light, but thence he sends out from himself a spirit, or a certain force, whither he pleases, by which he is truly present, and works there. But proceed we to his reasons, which he saith are not to be contemned. We shall therefore not contemn them so far, as not to take notice of them; which trouble also the reader may please to be at, and afterward do as he thinks fit. I. That no difl^erence can be conceived between God and creatures, if God, as they commonly speak, be wholly, in every point, or do fill all the points of the universe with his whole essence: for so whatsoever at all is, will be God himself. Answ. And that is most marvellous, that the in-being or one thing in another must needs take away all their difference, and confound them each with other; which sure would much rather argue them distinct. For certainly it cannot, without great impropriety, be said that any thing is in itself; and is both the container and contained. How were these thoughts in his mindl And these very notions which he opposes to each other, so as not to be confounded with his mind, and consequently with one another? So that it is a great wonder he was not of both opinions at once. And how did he think his soul to be in his body, which, though substantially united with it, (and that is somewhat more, as we will suppose he knew was com- monly held, than to be intimately present,) was not yet the same thing? However, himself acknowledges the power and providence of God to be every where : and then at least every thing must, it seems, be the very power and providence of God. But he thought, it may be, only of confuting the words of Lucan, and chastising his poetic liberty. And if he would have been at the pains to turn all their strains and raptures into propositions, and so have gravely fallen to confuting them, he might perhaps have found as proper an exercise for his logic as this. As for his talk of a whole, whereof we acknowledge na parts, (as if he imagined the divine essence to be compounded of such, he should have said so, and have proved it,) it is an absurd scheme of speech, which may be left to him, and them that use it, to make their best of. 2. No idolatry can be committed, if there be not the least point to be found, that is not wholly full of whole God : for whithersoever worship shall be directed, it shall be directed to Grod himself, who will be no less there than in heaven. Answ. This proceeds upon the supposition that the former would be granted as soon as it should be heard, as Nee loqiiitur DimH de Spiritu Sann.fo, ni" peculiaris qiiidem Dei .^piritus est. sed de SpiriUi Dei simpliciter. Nee dicit Spiritum i.stura utiinue re esse .s(d tantum docet nullum, esse locum, ad ouem i.s iiequeat pertingere, &c. b.0 also F. Socin. Smalcius. And {tlioiish not altogether so expressly M (he reati Vorstiua, Crellius, ^-e. «- » Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 55 a self-evident principle, that whatsoever is in another, is that in whict it is ; and so his consequence were most un- deniable. But though we acknowledge God to be in every- thing, yet so to worship him in any thing, as if his essen- tial presence were confined thereto, while it ought to be conceived of as immense, this is idolatry : and therefore they who so conceiv^e of it, as confined, (or tied in any re- spect, wherein he hath not so tied it himself,) are concern- ed to beware of running upon this rock. 3. Nor can the opinion of fanatics be solidly refuted, who call themselves spiritual, when they determine God to be all in all ; to do not only good but evil things, be- cause he is to be accoimted to be essentially in all the atoms of the world, in whole ; and as a common soul, by which all parts of the universe do act. Answ. We may in time make trial whether they can be refuted or no, or whether any solid ground will be left for it; at this time it will suffice to say, that though he be pre- sent every where as a necessary being, yet he acts as a free cause, and according as his wisdom, his good pleasure, his holiness and justice do guide his action. 4. So God will be equally present with the wicked, and with the holy and godly, with the damned in hell, and devils, as with the blessed in heaven, or Christ himself. Ansxo. So he will, in respect of his essential presence. How he is otherwise (distinguishingly enough) present in liis temple, we shall have occasion hereafter to show. 5. That I say not how shameful it is to think, that the u In his Dialogues. most pure and holy God should be as much in the most nasty places as in heaven, &c. (I forbear to recite the rest of this uncleanly argument, which is strong in nothing but ill savour.) But for Answ. How strange a notion was this of holiness, by which it is set in opposition to corporeal filthiness ! As if a holy man should lose or very much blemish his sanctity, by a casual fall into a puddle. Indeed, ii sense must give us measures of God, and every thing must be reckoned an offence to him that is so to it, we shall soon frame to our- selves a God altogether such a one as ourselves. The Epicureans themselves would have been ashamed to reason or conceive thus of God, who tell us the Divine Being is as little capable of receiving a stroke, as the inane ; and surely (in proportion) of any sensible offence. We might as well suppose him in danger, as Dr. More" fitly expresses it, to be hurt with a thorn, as offended with an ill smell. We have then enough to assure us of God's absolute immensity and omnipresence, and nothing of that value against it as ought to shake our belief herein. And surely the consideration of this, added to the other of his perfec- tions, (and which tends so directly to facilitate and strengthen our persuasion concerning the rest,) may render us assuredly certain, that we shall find him a conversable Being; if we seriously apply ourselves to converse with him, and will but allow him the liberty of that temple within us, whereof we are hereafter (with his leave and help) to treat more distinctly and at large. THE LIVING TEMPLE. PART II. CONTAINING ANIMADVERSIONS ON SPINOSA, AND A FRENCH WRITER PRETENDING TO CONFUTE HIM. A RECAPITULATION OF THE FORMER PART, AND AN ACCOUNT OF THE DESTITUTION AND RESTITUTION OF GOD'S TEMPLE AMONG MEN. A PREFACE, SHOWING THE INDUCEMENT AND GENERAL CONTENTS OF THIS SECOND PART. THE OCCASION OP CONSIDERING SPmOSA, AND A FRENCH WRITER WHO PRETENDS TO CONFUTE HIM. A SPECIMEN OF THE WAY AND STRENGTH OF THE FORMER'S REASONING, AS AN INTRODUCTION TO A MORE DISTINCT EXAMINATION OF SUCH OF HIS POSITIONS, AS THE DESIGN OF THIS DISCOURSE WAS MORE DIRECTLY CONCERNED IN. It is not worth the while to trouble the reader with an account why the progress of this work (begun many years ago, in a former part) hath been so long delayed ; or why it is now resumed. There are eases wherein things too little for public notice, maybe sufficient reasons to oneself: and such self-satisfaction is all that can be requisite, in a matter of no more importance than that circumstance only, of the time of sending abroad a discourse, of such a nature and subject, as that if it can be useful at any time, will be so at all times. The business of the present discourse, is religion ; which is not the concern of an age only, or of this or that time, but of all times ; and which, in respect of its grounds and basis, is eternal, and can never cease or vary. But if in its use and exercise it do at any time more visibly languish, by attempts against its foundations, an endeavour to establish them, if it be not altogether unfit to serve that purpose, will not be liable to be blamed as unseasonable. Every one will understand, that a design further to establish the grounds of religion, can have no other meaning, than only to represent their stability unshaken by any attempts upon them; that being all that is either possible in this case, or needful. Nothing more is possible : for if there be not already, in the nature of things, a sufficient foundation of religion, it is now too late ; for their course and order cannot begin again. Nor is any thing, besides such a representation, needful : lor have the adventures of daring wits (as they are fond of being thought) altered the nature of things'? Or hath their mere breath thrown the world off from its ancient basis, and new-moulded the universe, so as to make things be after the way of their own hearts 1 Or have they prevailed upon themselves, firmly to believe things are as they would wish 1 One would be ashamed to be of that sort of creature, called Alan, and count it an unsufTerable reproach to be long unresolved, Whether there ought to be such a thing in the world as religion, yea, or no. Whatever came on't, or what- soever I did or did not besides, I would drive this business to an issue ; I would never endure to be long in suspense about so weighty and important a question. But if I inclined to the negative, I would rest in nothing short of the plaiinest demonstration : for I am to dispute against mankind ; and eternity hangs upon it. If I misjudge, I run counter to the common sentiments of all the world, and am lost for ever. The opposers of it have nothing but inclina- tion to oppose it, with a bold jest now and then. But if I consider the unrefuted demonstrations brought for it, with the consequences, religion is the last thing in all the world upon which 1 would adventure to break a jest. And I would ask such as have attempted to argue against it, Have their strongest arguments conquered their fear 1 Have they no suspicion left, tha;t the other side of the question may prove true 1 They have done all they can, by often repeating their faint despairing wishes, and the mutterings of their hearts, " No God ! no God V to make themselves believe there is none ; when yet the restless tossings to and fro of their uneasy minds ; their tasking and torturing that little residue of wit and common sense, which their riot hath left them, (the excess of which latter, as well shows as causes the defect of the former,) to try every new method and scheme of atheism they hear of, implies their distrust of all; and their suspicion, that do what they can, things will still be as they were, /. e. most adverse and unfavourable to that way of living, which however at a venture, they had before resolved on. Therefore, they find it necessarj'- to continue their contrivances, how more etiectiially to disburden themselves of any obligation to be religious ; and hope, at least, some or other great wit may reach further than their own ; and that either by some new model of thonghts, or by not thinking, it may be possible at length to argue or wink the Deity into nothing, and all religion out of the world. And we are really to do the age that right, as to acknowledge, the genius of it aims at more consistency and agree- ment with itself, and more cleverly to reconcile notions with common practice than heretofore. Men seem to be grown weary of the old dull way of practising all manner of lewdness, and pretending to repent of them; to sin, and say they are sorry for it. The running this long-beaten circular tract of doing and repenting the same things, looks ridicu- lously, and they begin to be ashamed on't. A less interrupted and more progressive course in their licentious ways, looks braver ; and they count it more plausible to disbelieve this world to have any ruler at all, than to suppose it to hava PREFACE. 57 such a one as they can cheat and mock with so easy and ludicrous a repentance, or reconcile to their wickedness, only by calling themselves wicked, while they still mean to continue so. And perhaps of any other repentance they have not heard much; or if they have, they count it a more heroical, or feel it an easier thing to laugh away the fear of any future account or punishment, than to endure the severities of a serious repentance, and a regular life. Nor can they, however, think the torments of any hell so little tolerable as those of a sober and pious life upon earth. And for their happening to prove everlasting, they think they may run the hazard of that. For as they can make a sufficient shift to secure themselves from the latter sort of torments, so they believe the champions of their caube have taken sufficient care to secure them from the former. As religion hath its gospel and evangelists, so hath atheism and irreligion too. There are tidings of peace sent to such as shall repent and turn to God ; and there have been those appointed, whose business it should be to publish and expound them to the world. This also is the method for carrying on the design of irreligion. Doctrines are invented to make men fearless, and believe they need no repentance. And some have taken the part to assert and defend such doctrines, to evangelize the world, and cry " Peace, peace," to men, upon these horrid terms. And these undertake for the common herd, encourage them to mdulge themselves in all manner of liberty, while they watch for them, and guard the coasts: and no faith was ever more implicit or resigned, than the infidelity and disbelief of the more unthinking sort of these men. They reckon it is not every one's part to think. It is enough for the most to be boldly wicked, and credit their common cause, by an open contempt of God and religion. The otlier warrant them safe, and confidently tell them they may securely disbelieve all that ever hath been said, to make a religious regular life be thought necessary; as only invented frauds of sour and ill-natured men, that envy to mankind the felicity whereof their nature hath made them capable, and which their own odd preternatural humour makes them neglect and censure. And for these defenders of the atheistical cause, it being their part and province to cut off tlie aids of reason from religion, to make it seem an irrational and a ridiculous thing, and to warrant and justify the disuse and contempt of it, and as it were, to cover the siege, wherewith the common rout have begirt the temple of God; they have had less leisure themselves, to debauch and wallow in more grossly sensual impurities. Herewith the thinking part did kss agree: and they might perhaps count it a greater thing to make debauchees than to be such, and reckon it was glory enough to them to head and lead on the numerous throng, and pleasure enough to see them they had so thoroughly disciplined to the service, throw dirt and squibs at the sacred pile, the dwelling of God among men on earth, and cry, " Down with it even to the ground." Nor for this sort of men, w^hose business w-as only to be done by noise and clamour, or by jest and laughter, we could think them no more fit to be discoursed with than a whirlwind, or an ignis fatuus. But for such as have assumed to themselves the confidence to pretend to reason, it was not fit they should have cause to think themselves neglected. Considering therefore, that if the existence of a Deity were fully proved, {i. e. such as must be the fit object of religion, or of the honour of a temple,) all the little cavils against it must signify nothing, (because the same thing cannot be both true and false,) we have in the former part of this discourse, en- deavoured to assert so much in an argumentative way. And therefore first laid down such a notion of God, as even atheists themselves, wiiile they deny him to exist, cannot but grant to be the tnve notion of the thing thej- deny ; tisr. summarily that he can be no other than a being absolutely perfect. And thereupon next proceed to evince the exist- ence of such a being. And whereas this might have been attempted in another method, as was noted Part 1. CA. 1. by concluding the existence of such a being first from the idea of it, which (as a fundamental perfection) involves ex- istence ; yea, and necessity of existence, most apparently in it. Because that was clamoured at as sophistical and captious, (though very firm unsliding steps might, with caution, be taken in that way,*) yet we rather chose the other as plainer, more upon the square, more easily intelligible and convictive, and less liable to exception in any kind; i. e. rather to begin at the bottom, and rise from necessity of existence, to absolute perfection, than to begin at the top, and prove downward, from absokite perfection, necessity of existence. Now, if it do appear from what hath been said concerning the nature of necessarj', self-existing being, that it cannot but be absolutely perfect, even as it is such, since nothing is more evident than that some being or other doth exist necessarily, or of itself, our point is gained without more ado ; i. e. we have an object of religion, or one to whom a temple duly belongs. We thereupon used some endeavour to make that good, and secure that more compendious way to our end ; as may be seen in the former Part. Which was endeavoured as it was a nearer and more expeditions course ; not that the main cause of religion did depend upon the immediate and self-evident reciprocal connexion erf the terms necessary existence, and absolute perfectiori, as we shall see hereafter in the follow-ing discourse; but because there are other hypotheses, that proceed either upon the denial of any necessary being that is absolutely perfect, or upon the assertion of some necessary being that is not absolutely perfect ; it hence appears requisite, to undertake the exa- mination of what is said to either of these purposes, and to show with how little pretence a necessary most perfect being is denied, or any such imperfect necessary being, is either asserted or imagined. We shall therefore in this Second Part, first, take into consideration what is (with equal absurdity and impiety) asserted by one author, of the identity of all substance, of the impossibility of one substance being produced by another, and consequently of one necessary self-existing being, pretended with gross self-repugnancy, to be endued with infi- nite perfections, but really represented the common receptacle of all imaginable imperfection and confusion. — Next, what is asserted by another in avowed opposition to him, of a necessary self-existent being, that is at the same time said to be essentially imperfect. — Then we shall recapitulate what had been discoursed in the former Part, for proof of such a necessarily existent and absolutely perfect being, as is there asserted. — Thence we shall proceed to show how reasonably Scripture testimony is to be relied upon, in reference to some things concerning God, and the religion of his temple, which either are not so clearly demonstrable, or not at all discoverable the rational way. — And shall lastly show how it hath come to pass, if God be such as he hath been represented, so capable of a temple with man, so apt and inclined to inhabit such a one, that he should ever not do so ; or how such a temple should ever cease, or be unin- habited and desolate, that the known -R-ay of its restitution may be the more regardable and marvellous in our eyes. The authors against whom we are to be concerned, are Benedictus Spinosa, a Jew, and an anonymous French writer, who pretends to confute him. And the better to prepare our way, we shall go on to preface something concerning the former, viz. Spinosa, whose scheme,+ though, with great pretence of devotion, it acknowledges a Deity, yet so con- founds this his fictitious deity with every substantial being in the w-orld besides, that upon the whole it appears al- together inconsistent with any rational exercise or sentiment of religion at all. And indeed, the mere pointing with the finger at the most discernible and absurd weakness of some of his principal supports, might be sufficient to over- mrn his whole fabric ; though perhaps he thought the fraudulent artifice of contriving it geometricaDy must-conloimd all the world, and make men think it not liable to he attacked in any part. But whether it can, or no, we shall make some present trial ; and for a previous essay, (to show that he is not invul- nerable, and that his scales do not more closely cohere, than those of his brother-leviathan,) do but compare his defi- nition of an attribute,* " That which the understanding perceives of substance ; as constituting the essence thereof,' * As by tJie excellent Dr. Cudworth, in liis Intellectual System, we find ia done. ♦ As U laid down in his Poslhvnious Elhics. I Etliic. Put 1. DkL 4. 68 PREFACE. ■with his fifth Proposition, " There cannot be two or more substances of the same nature or attribute ;" which is as much as to say that two substances cannot be one and the same substance. For the attribute of any substance (saitn he) constitutes its essence ; whereas the essence therefore of one thing, cannot be the essence of another thing, if such an attribute be the essence of one substance, it cannot be the essence of another substance. A rare d'scovery ! and which needed mathematical demonstration! Well, and what now 1 Nothing, it is true, can be plainer, if by the same attribute or nature, he means numerically the same ; it only signifies one thing is not another thing. But if he mean there cannot be two things or substances, of the same special or general nature, he hath his whole business yet to do ; which how he does, we shall see in time. But now compare herewith his defuiition of what he thinks fit to dignify with the sacred name of God : " By God (saith he*) I understand a being absolutely infinite ; i.e. a substance consisting of infinite attributes, every one whereof expresses an iniinite essence." And behold the admirable agreement ! how amicably his definition of an attribute, and that mentioned proposition, accord with this definition (as he calls it) of God ! There cannot be two substances, he saith, that have the same attribute, i. e. the same essence. But now it seems the same substance may have infinite attributes, i. e. infinite essences ! O yes, very conveniently : for he telist you that two attributes really distinct, we cannot conclude do constitute two divers substances. And why do they not 1 Because it belongs to the nature of substance, that each of its attributes be conceived by itself, &c. Let us consider his assertion, and his reason for it. He determines, you see, two really distinct attributes do not constitute two divers substances. You must not here take any other man's notion of an attribute, according to which, there may be accidental attributes, that, we are sure, would not infer diversity of substances for their subjects; or, there may be also essential ones, that only flow from the essence of the thing to which they belong ; so, too, nobody doubts one thing may have many properties. But we must take his own notion of an attribute, according whereto it constitutes, or (which is all one) is, that very essence. Now -will not such attributes as these, being really distinct, make divers substances 1 Surely what things are essentially diverse, must be concluded to be most diverse. But these attributes are by himself supposed to be really distinct, and to constitute (which is to be) the essence of the substance. And how is that one thing, or one substance, which hath many essences 1 If the essence of a thing be that, by which it is what it is, surely the plurality of essences must make a plurality of things. But it may be said. Cannot one thing be compounded of two or more things essential diverse, as the soul and body of a man ; whence therefore, the same thing, viz. a man, will have two essences 1 This is true, but impertinent. For the very notion of composition signifies these are two things united, not identified, that are capable of being again separated ; and that the third thing, which results from them both united, contains them still distinct from one another, not the same. But it may be said, though these attributes are acknowledged and asserted to be distinct from one another, they are yet found in one and the same substance common to them all. And this no more ought to be reckoned repugnant to common reason, than the philosophy heretofore in credit, which taught that the vast diversity of forms throughout the imiverse, which were counted so many distinct essences, do yet all reside in the same first matter, as the common re- ceptacle of them all. Nor yet doth this salve the business, were that philosophy never so sure and sacred. For you must consider he asserts an attribute is that which constitutes the essence of the substance in which it is. But that philosophy never taught the forms lodged in the same common matter were its essence, though they were supposed to essentiate the composifa, which resulted from their union therewith. Yea, it did teach they were so little the essence of that common matter, that they might be expelled out of it, and succeeded by new ones, and yet the matter which received them still remain the same. But that an attribute should be supposed to be the essence of the substance to which it belongs ; and that another superadded attribute, which is also the essence of .substance, should not make another .substance essentially distinct, is an assertion as repugnant to common sense, as two and two make not four. But that which completes the jest, (though a tremendous one upon so awful a subject,) is, that this author* should so gravely tell the ■world, they who are not of his sentiment, being ignorant of the causes of things, confound all things ; imagine trees and men speaking alike, confound the divine nature with the human, &c. Who would imagine this to be the com- plaining voice of one so industriously labouring to mingle heaven and earth ! and to make God, and men, £ind beasts, and stones, and trees, nil one and the same individual substance! And now let us consider the reason of that assertion of his ; why two attributes really distinct, do not constitute two beings, or two distinct substances; because, saith he,§ it is of the nature of substance that each of its attributes be conceived by itself, &c. A marvellous reason ! Divers attributes, each whereof, as before, constitutes the essence of substance, do not make divers substances; because those attributes may be conceived apart from each other, and are not produced bj' one another. It was too plain to need a proof, (as ■was observed before,) that there cannot be two substances of one attribute, or of one essence, (as his notion of an attribute is,) i. e. two are not one. But that two attributes or essences of substance, cannot make two substances, because they are diverse, is very surprisingly strange. This was (as Cicero upon as good an occasion speaks) not to consider, but to cast lots what to say. And it deserves observation too, how well this assertion, " That two distinct attributes do not constitute two distinct substances," agrees ■with thatjii " Two substances having divers attributes, have nothing common between them." This must certainly suppose the diversity of attributes to make the greatest diversity of substances imaginable; when they admit not there should be any thing (not the least thing) common between them ! And yet they make not distinct substances I But this was only to make way for what was to follow, the overthrow of the creation. A thing he was so over- intent upon, that in the heat of his zeal and haste, he makes all fly asunder before him, and overturns even his own batteries as fast as he raises them ; says and unsays, does and undoes, at all adventures. Here two substances are supposed having distinct attributes, that is, distinct essences, to have therefore nothing common between them ; and yet presently after, the two, or never so many distinct attributes, give unto substance two, or never so many distinct essences, yet they shall not be so much as two, but one only. For to the query put by himself. By what sign one may discern the diversity of substances 1 he roundly answers,ir The following propositions would show there was no other substance but one, and that one infinite, and therefore how substances were to be diversified would be inquired in vain. Indeed, it would be in vain, if knowing them to have different essences, we must not yet call them different substances. But how the following propositions do show there can be no more than one substance, we shall see in time. We shall for the present take leave of him, till we meet him again in the following discourse. • Definit. 6. t Schol. in Prop. 10. J Schol, S, in Prop. 8. Part k § Schol. in Prop. 10. D Prop. 2. IT Schol. in Prop. 10. THE LIVING TEMPLE. PART IL CHAPTER L WHEREIN tS SHOWN, THE DESTRUCTIVENESS OF* SPINOSa's SCHEME AND DESFGN TO RELIGION AND THE TEMPLE OF GOD. THE REPUGNANCY OF HIS DOCTRINE TO THIS ASSERTION — THAT WHATSOEVER EXISTS NECESSARILY AND OF ITSELF, IS AESOLUTELT PERFECT; WHICH IS THEREFORE FURTHER WEIGHED. IIIS VAIN ATTEMPT TO PROVE WHAT HE DESIGNS. HIS SECOND PROPO- SITION CONSIDERED. HIS DEFINITION OF A SUBSTANCE DEFECTIVE. PROVES NOT HIS PURPOSE. HIS THIRD^ FOURTH, AND FIFTH PROPOSITION. HIS EIGHTH SCHOLIA. THE MANUDUCTIO AD PANTOSOPHIAM. Hitherto we have discoursed only of the Owner of this temple, and shown to whom it rightfully belongs ; viz. That there is one only necessary, self-existing, and most absolutely-perfect being, the glorious and ever-blessed God — who is capable of our converse, and inclined thereto; whom we are to conceive as justly claiming a temple with us, and ready, upon our willing surrender, to erect in us, or repair such a one, make it habitable, to inhabit and re- plenish it with his holy and most delectable presence, and converse with us therein suitably to himself and us ; i. e. to his own excellency and fulness, and to our indigency and wretchedness. And now tlie order of discourse would lead us to behold the sacred structure rising, and view the surprising methods by which it is brought about, that any such thing should have place in such a world as this. But we must yield to stay, and be detained a little by some things of greater importance than merely the more even shape and order of a discourse ; that is, looking back upon what hath been much insisted on in the former Part — That some being or other doth exist necessarily and of itself, which is of absolute or universal perfection — and taking notice of the opposite sentiments of some hereto- because the whole design of evincing an object of religion would manifestly be much served hereby, we could not but reckon it of great importance to consider what is said against it. We have observed in the Preface a two-fold opposite hypothesis, which therefore, before we go further in the discourse of this temple of God, require to be dis- cussed. I. The first is that of Spinosa, which he hath more ex- pressly stated, and undertaken with great pomp and boast to demonstrate, in his Postkummis Ethics ; which "we shall therefore so far consider, as doth concern our present design. He there, as hath been noted in the preface, as- serts all " substance to be self-existent, and to be infinite ; that one substance is improducible by another ; that there is but one, and this one he calls God, &c." Now this hor- rid scheme of his, though he and his followers woitld cheat the world with names, and with a specious show of piety, is as directly levelled against all religion, as any the most avowed atheism : for, as to religion, it is all one whether we make nothing to be God, or every thing; whether we allow of no God to be worshipped, or leav^e none to worship him. His portentous attempt to identify and deify all substance, attended with that strange pair of attributes, extension and tkeught, (and an infinite number of others besides,) hath a manifest design to throw reli- gion out of the world that way. II. And it most directly opposes the notion of a self- existent Being, which is absolutely perfect: for such a being must be a substance, if it be any thing ; and he allows no substance but one, and therefore none to be perfect, unless all he so. And since we are sure some is imperfect, it will be consequeEt there is none absolutely perfect ; for that the same should be imperfect, and abso- lutely perfect, is impossible. Beside.';, that he makes it no way possible to one substance to produce another, and what is so impotent must be very imperfect: yea, and whatsoever is not omnipotent, is evidently not absolutely perfect. We are therefore cast upon reconsidering this proposition — Whatsoever being exists necessarily and of itself, is absolutely perfect. It is true that if any being be evinced to exist necessarily and of itself, which is ab- solutely perfect, this gives us an object of religion, and throws Spinosa's farrago, his confused heap and jumble of self-existent being, into nothing. But if we carry the universal proposition as it is laid down, though that will oblige us afterwards as well to confute his French eon- futer, as him ; it carries the cause of religion with much the greater clearness, and with evident, unexceptionable self-consistency. For indeed that being cannot be under- stood to be absolutely perfect, which doth not eminently comprehend the entire fulness of all being in itself; as that must be a heap of imperfection, an everlasting chaos, an impossible, self-repugnant medley, that should be pre- tended to contain all the varieties, the diversifications, compositions, and mixtures of things in itself formally. And for the universal proposition : the matter itself re- quires not an immediate, self-evident, reciprocal connex- ion of the terms — necessarily self-existent, and absolutely perfect. It is enough that it however be brought about by gradual steps, in a way that at length cannot fail; and I conceive hath been in the method that was followed in the former Part. For, to bring the business now within as narrow a compass as is possible : nothing is more evident than that some being exists necessarily, or of itself; otherwise no- thing at all could now exist. Again, for the same reason, there is some necessarj^ or self-existent being that is the cause of whatsoever being exists not of itself; otherwise nothing of that kind could ever come into being. Now that necessary being, which is the cause of all other being, will most manifestly appear to be absolutely perfect. For, if it be universally causative of all other being, it mu.st both have been the actual cause of all being that doth actually exist, and can only be the possible cause of ali that is possible to exist. Now so universal a cause cac be no other than an absolutely or universally perfect being. For it could be the cause "of nothing, which it did not virtually or formally comprehend in itself And that being which comprehends in itself all perfection, both actual and possible, must be absolutely or universally perfect. And such a being, as hath also further more particularly been made apparent, must be an intelligent and a designing agent, or cause ; because, upon the whole universe of pro- duced beings, there are most manifest characters of design, in the passive sense. They are designed to serve ends to which they have so direct and constant an aptitude, as that the attempt to make it be believed they were forced or fell in that posture of subserviency to such and such ends, by any pretended necessity upon their principal cause or causes, or bv mere casualty, looks like the most ludi- crous triflins; to any man of sense. And because that among produced beings there are found to be many, that are them- 60 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. selves actively designing, and that do understandingly intend and pursue ends; and consequently that they themselves must partake of an intelligent, spiritual nature, since mere inatter is most manifestly incapable of thought or design. And further, by the most evident consequence, that their productive cause, {viz. the necessary, self-ex- isting Being, whereto all other things owe themselves,) must be a mind or spirit, inasmuch as to suppose any effect to have any thing more of excellency in it than the cause from whence it proceeded, is to suppose all that ex- cellency to be effected without a cause, or to have arisen of itself out of nothing. See former Part, Chap. III. Sect. XII. &c. Therefore if it did not immediately appear that neces- sary being, as such, is absolutely perfect being ; yet, by this series of discourse, it appears that the main cause of religion is still safe ; inasmuch as that necessary Being which is the cause of all things else, is however evinced to be an absolutely perfect Being, and particularly a neces- sary self-existent Mind or Spirit, which is therefore a most apparently tit and most deserving object of religion, or of the lionour of a temple ; which is the sum of what we were concerned for. Nor needed we be solicitous, but that the unity or onliness of the necessary Being, would afterwards be made appear, as also we think it was. For since the whole universe of produced being must arise out of that which was necessary self-existent Being, it must therefore comprehend all being in itself, its own formally, and eminently all other; i. e. what was its own, being for- mally its own, must be eminently also all being else, con- tained in all possible simplicity, within the productive power of its own. This Being therefore containing in itself all that exists necessarily, with the power of pro- ducing all the rest, which together make up all being, can primarily be but one, inasmuch as there can be but one all. Upon the whole therefore, our general proposition is suf- ficiently evident, and out of question — That whatever ex- ists necessarily, and of itself, is absolutely perfect. Nor is it at all incongruous that this matter should be thus argued out, by such a train and deduction of consequences, drawn from effects, that corne under our present notice; for how come we to know that there is any self-existing Being at all, but that we find there is somewhat in being that is subject to continual mutation, and which therefore exists not necessarily, (for whatsoever is what it is neces- sarily, can never change, or be other than what it is,) but must be caused by that which is necessary and self-exist- ent. Nothing could be more reasonable or more certain than the deduction from what appears of excellency and perfection in such being as it is caused ; of the corres- pondent and far-transcendent excellency and perfection of its cause. But yet, after all this, if one set himself at- tentively to consider, there must appear so near a con- nexion between the very things themselves, self -existence and absolute perfection, that it can be no easy matter to conceive them separately. Self-existence ! Into how profound an abyss is a man cast at the thought of it ! How doth it overwhelm and swallow up his mind and whole soul ! With what satis- faction and delight must he see himself comprehended, of what he finds he can never comprehend! For contem- plating the self-existent Being, he finds it eternally, neces- sarily, never not existing! He can have no thought of the self-existing Being, ^ as such, but as always existing, as having existed always, as always certain to exist. Inquir- ing into the spring and source of this Being's existence, whence it is that it doth exist ; his own notion of a self-existing Being, which is not arbitrarily taken up, but which the reason of things hath imposed upon him, gives him his answer; and it can be no other, in that it is a self- existing Being, it hath it of itself, that it doth exist. It is an eternal, everlasting spring and fountain of perpetually- existent being to itself. What a glorious excellency of being Ls this ! What can this mean, but the greatest re- moteness from nothing that is possible; i. e. the most absolute fulness and plenitude of all being and perfection! And whereas all caused being, as such, is, to every man's understanding, confined within certain limits ; what can a 1)es Cartw. b Dr. More. the uncaused seif-existent Being be, but most unlimited, infinite, all-comprehending, and most absolutely perfect 1 Nothing therefore can be more evident, than that the self- existent Being must be the absolutely perfect Being. And again, if you simply convert the terms, and let this be the proposition, — That the absolutely-perfect Being is the self-existent Being — it is most obvious to every one, that the very notion of an absolutely-perfect Being carries necessity of existence, or self-exisfence, in it ; which the notion of nothing else doth. And indeed one great mas- terb of this argument for the existence of God, hath him- self told me, " That though when he had puzzled divers atheists with it they had been wont to quarrel at it, as so- phistical and fallacious, he could never meet with any that could detect the sophism, or tell where any fallacy in it lay ; and that, upon the whole, he relied upon it as most solid and firm." And I doubt not but it may be managed with that advantage as to be very clearly concluding; yet, because I reckoned the way I have taken more clear, I chose it rather. But finding that so near cognation and reciprocal connexion between the terms both ways, I reck- oned this short representation hereof, annexed to the larger course of evincing the same thing, might add no unuseful strength to it ; and doubt not to conclude, upon the whole, that — whatsoever Being exists necessarily, and of itself, is absolutely perfect — and can, therefore, be no other than an intelligent Being; i. e. an infinite, eternal Mind, and so a most fit, and the only fit, deserving object of religion, or of the honour of a temple. III. But now, be all this never so plain, it will, by some, be thought all false, if they find any man to have contrivance enough to devise some contrary scheme of things, and confidence enough to pretend to prove it ; till that proof be detected of weakness and vanity, which must first be our further business with Spinosa. And not intending to examine particularly the several parts and junctures of his model, inasmuch as I find his whole de- sign is lost, if he fail of evincing these things, — That it belongs to all substance, as such, to exist of itself, and be infinite — And, (which will be sufficiently consequent here- upon,) That substance is but one, and that it is impossible for one substance to produce another. I shall only attend to what he more directly says to this effect, and shall par- ticularly apply myself to consider such of his propositions as more immediately respect this his main design: for they will bring us back to the definitions and axioms, or other parts of his discourse, whereon those are groimded, and even into all the darker and more pernicious recesses of his labyrinth ; so as every thing of importance to the mentioned purpose will be drawn imder our considera- tion, as this thread shall lead us. His first proposition we let pass; " That a substance is, in order of nature, before its affections ;" having nothing applicable to his purpose in it, which we shall not other- wise meet with. His second, " That two substances, having divers attri- butes, have nothing common between them ; or, which must be all one, do agree in nothing, I conceive it will be no great presumption to deny. And since he is pleased herein to be divided from himself, it is a civility to hi? later and wiser self to do so, who will afterwards have substance, having a multitude of distinct attributes, i. e, essences,'^ and which therefore cannot but be manifold, tc have every thing common. So little hath he common with himself. And it will increase the ooligation upon him, to deliver him from the entanglement of his demonstration, as he calls it, of this proposition ; as I hope we shall also of the other too, for no doubt they are both false. Of this pro- position his demonstration is fetched from his third defini- tion, viz. of a substance, " That which is in itself, and conceived by itself; i. e. whose conception needs the con- ception of nothing else, whereby it ought to be formed;" so is his definition defined over and over. We are here to inquire : — 1. Into his definition of a substance. 2. Whether it sufficiently prove his proposition. IV. F'irst, For his definition of a substance. He himself tells us, one infi- niteh substance in being. It is true indeed, that the defini- tion of a thing (which we have before said is of specific nature, not of individuals) expresses not any certain num- ber of existing individuals, (be it man, or triangle, or what else you please,) nor any at all. For surely the defiiiiiion o^" man, or triangle, would be the same, if every individual of each should be abolished and cease. But that, if any do exi.st, some cause must be assignable why they exist, and why so many only. What is to be inferred from this ? That the reason being the same, as to every substance whose essence involves not existence in it, (which that the essence of every substance doth, or of substance as such, he hath not proved, nor ever can) when any such substance is found to exist, the cause of its existence, not being in its own nature, must be external. And there- fore, so many only do exist, because a free agent, able to produce them, (for the very substance of created beings itself, owes not its production to a merely natural, unde- signing, or to any subordinate agent onlj',) was pleased to produce so many, and no more. And so hath this unhap- py author himself, with great pains and sweat, reasoned out for us the very thing we assert. But that it may be further seen, how incurious a writer this man of demonstration is, and how fatally, while he is designing the overthrow of religion, he overthrows his own design, I shall not let pass what he says, in demon- strating Ids twelfth prop. — " That no attribute of substance can be truly conceived, from which it may follow, that substance can be divided." How he proves it by prop, eighth, and after by the sixth, I shall not regard, till I see those propositions better proved. But that which I at pre- sent remark, is his argument from prop, fifth, — " That if substance could be divided, each part must consist of a dilTerent attribute ; and so of one sub.stance many might be constituted." A fair confession, that many attributes will constitute many substances. And himself acknow- ledges many attributes of substance, (def. sixth, and prop, eleventh.) And therefore, though he here call this an absurdity, it is an absurdity which he hath inevitably now fastened upon himself, having here allowed, plainly, the consequence (as was above promised to be shown) that if there be diversity of attributes, they will constitute a di- versity of substances, which it was before impossible to him to disallow, having defined an attribute (as was form- erly noted) to bei that which constitutes the essence of sub- stance. Therefore, his whole cause is here fairly given away ; for his one substance is now scattered into many, and the pretended impossibility of the creation of any substantial being, quite vanished into thin and empty air. The many inconsistencies to be noted also in his annexed letters, with several parts of his discourse, it is not my business particularly to reflect on. It is enough, to vuj purpose, to have shown he comes short of his. X. Upon the whole, little more seems needful for the refutation of this his horrid doctrine of the unity, .self- existence, and infinity of all substance, than only to oppose Spinosa to Spinosa. Nor have I ever met with a discourse so equally inconsistent with all principles of reason and religion, and with itself. And so frequently doth he over- throw his own ill design, in this very discourse, that it is altogether unnecessary to insist on the inconsistencies of this, with his demonstrations of Des Cartes's principles, }> P 31. i net. 4. i A?J"^ asserting God to be a most simple t)einff, and tliat his attrihules do only difter, ratione Wherea.'i, now. lie makes his attributes as divers, as exten- sion and tbouelit. and says, they i.uplit to be conceived as really distinct. .«!ihnl. ui Prop. 10. There ho asserts all things to be created by God, here, noUilnj;. written divers years before. Against which, every one that hath compared, knows these his later sentiments to import so manifest hostility, that I may well spare that vain and useless labour, it being sufficient only to note the more principal, in the margin. k His following propositions (and among them those most surprising ones, the sixteenth and twenty-eighth) tend to evince the onliness of substance, and the absolute necessity of all actions ; but upon grounds so plainly already dis- covered to be vain and false, that we need follow him nc further. Nor is it necessary to di.sprove his hypothesis, or charge it with the many absurdities that belong to it ; they are so horrid and notorious, that to any one who is not in love with absurdity for itself, it will abtmdantly suffice to have .shown he hath not proved it. XI. I cannot but, in the meantime, take some notice of the genius, which seems to have inspired both him and his devotees. A fraudulent pretence to religion, while they conspire against it. Whereof many instances might be given ; as the prefixing that text of Holy Scriptu^re to so impure a volume, on the title-page, 1 John iv. 13. " By this we know that we dwell in God, and God dwelleth in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit." That the pre- face to his posthumous works is filled up with quotations out of the Bible ; which it is their whole design to make signify nothing. The divine authority whereof, an anony mous defender of his, in that part of his work which he entitles. Specimen artis ratiucinandi, no.turalis ci ardficialh ad pantosophi<£ j^rincipia munuiuccns, undeitakes to de- monstrate (because, as he says, all religion depends upon the word of God) by an argument, which, he says, he can glory, that after many years meditation, the divine grace favouring him, he hath found out, by which he tell us,i he is able (to do what, that he knows, no man hath ever done before him) to demonstrate naturally the truth of the sacred Scripture, that i.s. That it is the word of God. An argument, he says, able to convince the most pertinacious pagan, &c. And it is taken from the idea of God, com- pared with that divine saying, Exod. iii. 14. " I am that I am." Whereupon what he says will to any one who at- tentively reads show his design, viz. at once to expose religion, and hide himself. And so do;h his collusion sufficiently appear in making the soul philosophically mortal, aiid Christianly immortal, p. 70, &c. But if the philosopher perish for ever, what will become of the Christian "? This author also finds great fault with the instances usually given to exemplify the common definition of sub- stance. That is, a bciiig subsisting hj itself, or in itself,"' because he thought them not agreeable enough to his master Spinosa's notion of the unity and identity of all substances, and consetjuently of the improductibility of any. And he fancies them to contradict themselves, that while they call the sun, the moon, the earth, this or that tree, or stone, substances, they yet admit them to be pro- duced by another. For how "can it be, saith he, that they should be in or by themselves, and yet depend on another, as on a subject, or as an efficient cause 1 He is very angry, and says they by it do but crucify and mock their readers, only because it crosses and disappoints his and his master's impious purpose of deifying every substance. And there- fore, to serve that purpose as he fancies the better, he would more aptly model all things, and reduce them to two distinct kinds only, viz. Of things that may be conceived primarily and in themselves, without involving the concep- tion of a'nother ; and again, of things that we conceive not primarily and in themselves, but secondarily and by ano- ther, whose conception is involved in their conception. But all the while, what is there in this, more than what is common and acknowledged on all hands 1 as the sense of the trivial distich he takes the pains to recite, Summus Aristoteles, &c. But when all this is granted, what is he nearer his mark 1 Of that former sort, still some are from another; and one other only of and from itself. But then (says he) There be makes corporeal .siiKstance divisible ; here, all substance imlivisililc, &c. And yet in this work (vide Schol. hi Prop. 19 ) refsrs us to the former, & if, when the one destroys the other, Ixjth were firm. 1 P. 241, &-c. m nioiiuduct. p. 11, 12. 64 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part I[. how are those former conceived in and by themselves 1 Well enoug:h, say I; for they are to be conceived, as they are to be deliiied; but the definition of a thing is to ex- press only its own nature and essence (as Spinosa himself says, Schol. 2. in Prop. 8.) considered apart by itself, into which (as hath been said) the efficient cause, which is ex- trinsical to it, enters not; and without considering wliether it exist or exist not. Because definitions are of special kinds, or common natures, that exist not as such ; not of existing individual.^, except the one only self-subsisting, original Being, of whose essence existence is; which Spi- nosa himself acknowledges, and makes his twentieth pro- position ; as on the other hand, that " The essence of things produced by God involves not existence," is his twenty- fourth. XII. But that the substance of things, whose essence involves existence, and whose essence involves it not, should be one and the same, exceeds all wonder! One would think, so vastly different essences of substance should at least make different substances; and that when Spinosa hath told us so expressly, that an " attribute of substance constitutes the essence of substance ; and that all the attributes of substance are distinctly conceived ; the conception of the one, not involving the conception of ano- ther;" and so do most really differ from each other, and make so many essences therefore, of substance really dis- tinct, (though he once thought otherwise of the divine at- tributes, that they did only differ from each other rationc, and that God was a most simple Being, which he also takes pains to prove, R. D. Cartes. Princip. Philos. Ap- pend, part 2d. cap. 5. p. 117, 118,) one would surely here- upon think, that so vastly different attributes, as necessary existence, and contingent, should constitute the most dif- ferent substances imaginable. For what is an attribute"? Jd quod intclleclus de sviisiantia pcrcipit, tanqvnm ejus es- sejitiam constituens. (Def. 4.) Now the essence of some substance the understanding most clearly perceives as in- volving existence in it. Existence therelbre constitutes the essence of such substance, and is therefore an attribute of it. Some other essence it as clearly perceives, that in- volves not existence. Now this sort of essence is the at- tribute of somewhat. And of what is it the attribute? Why, he hath told us, "An attribute is what the under- standing perceives of substance as constituting its essence ;" therefore, some substance hath such an essence as involves not existence. Now let it hereupon be considered (albeit that I affect not to give high tides to any reasonings of mine) whether this amount not to a demonstration against the hj'pothesis of Spinosa, and the rest of his v.'ay, that all substance is self-existent ; and that, even upon their own principles and concessions, so frequently acknowledging the world to be produced, and not self-existent, that even the substance of it is produced also ; which they deny, viz." That whose essence, this unnamed author says, includes not existence, either hath some substance belonging to its essence, or it hath not. If not, it may exist without substance; and then unto what is it an attribute, or what doth it modify? If yea, there is then some substance, and particularly that of this world, in whose essence existence is not included; and that by consequence, the substance of this world is produced. But if any make a difficuliy of it to under- stand, how all being and perfection should be included in the Divine Being, and not be very God; so much is already said to this in the former Part of this discourse, (viz. Chap. 4. Sect. XII. &c.) that as I shall not here re- peat what hath been said, so I think it unnecessary to say more. And it is what Spinosa hiinself had once such sobriety of mind as to apprehend, when (Princip. R. D. Cart. Phi- losoph. more Geometr. demonsirat. Append, part 1. cap. 2.) he says thus of God, or of increate substance, that God doth eminently contain that which is found formally in created things, i. c. God hath that in his own nature, in which all created things are contained in a more eminent manner; and that there is some attribute in God, wherein all the perfections, even of matter, are after a more excel- lent manner themselves contained. Having before told us, n Maniiduct. p. 107. (Princip. Ps.rt I. Axiom 8.) That by eminently, he under- stood when a cause did contain all the reality of its effect more perfectly than the effect itself; by formally, when it contained it in equal perfection. And so he might have told himself of somewhat sufficiently common (though not univocally) to the substance of the Divine Nature, and that of creatures ; whereon to found the causality of the former, in reference to the latter, as effected thereby. But as he grew older, his understanding either became less clear, or was more perverted by ill design. CHAPTER II. Animadversions from a French writer, nameless. His pretence to confufe Spi- nosa. The opinion of the world's being made of independent self-e.xisting matter ; cliosen by liim and asserted against two other opinions. Tliat of matter's being created out of nothing rejected, and falsely charged with novelty. Moses, and the author to the Hebrews misalleged, vindicated. Self-originate, independent matter disproved : asserted by tnis author with evident self-contradiction ; and without necessity. I. But having here done with him and that sort of men, I shall now very briefly consider the fore-mentioned Mon- sieur's way of confuting him. The conceit, that there must be such a thing as necessary self-subsisting matter, hath I confess seemed to be favoured by some or other name among the Ethnics of that value, as to have given some countenance to a better cause ; besides some others, who with greater incongruity, and more injury to it, have pro- fessed the Christian name. It hath been of late espoused, and asserted more expressly, by this French gentleman, who hath not thought fit to dignify it with his name, doubting perhaps whether the acquainting the world wilh it, might not more discredit his cause, than his cause (in this part of it) could better the reputation of his name. However it be, though my inquiry and credible informa- tion hath not left me ignorant, I shall not give him occa- sion to think him.self uncivilly treated, by divulging what he seems willing should be a secret. For though it was not intrusted to me as such, I shall be loth to disoblige him by that, whereby that I know I can oblige nobody else. It is enough that his book may be known by its title, VImpie convaincu. It is professedly written against the atheism of Spinosa. And when I first looked into ii, I could not refrain thinking of Plato's repartee to Diogenes, when the latter undertook to reprehend the other's pride, that he did it with greater pride. Although I think not the application is to be made in the strictest terms. For I will neither be so indulgent to Spinosa, as to reckon that any man's atheism can be greater than his ; nor so seveie to this his adversary, as positively to conclude he designed the service of any atheism at all. But I think him at least, unwarily and without any neces.sity, to have quitted one of the principal supports of the doctrine of a Deity; and that he hath undertaken the confutation of atheism, upon a ground that leads to atheism. II. He thinks, it seems, Spinosa not otherwise confuta- ble, than upon the hypothesis of eternal, independent matter, which he thus explains in his preface, it being the second of the three distinct hypotheses whereof he there gives an account. The second," he says, is theirs who assert two beings or two substances increate, eternal, independent, as to their simple existence, though very differently ; the former whereof is God, the infinitely perfect Being, almighty, the principle of all perfection ; and the second, matter, a being essentially imperfect, without power, without life, without knowledge ; but capable nevertheless of all these perfections, by impression from God, and his operations upon it. This he pretends to have been the hypothesis of the ancient philosophers and divines (after he had acknow- ledged the former hypothesis — " That the world, and the matter of it, v/ere drawn out of nothing by the infinite power of the first and supreme Being, which itself alone was eternal and independent," — was the hj'pothesis of the greater part of Christian divines and philosophers.) And this second, he says, is the hypothesis which he shall fol- a La leconde eBt celle de ceux qui, &c. AvertiBsemont. Chap. II. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 65 low, rejecting the first, but now menlionecl ; and in oppo- sition to the third, which makes the world and its produc- tion to be nothing else than an emanation of the Divine Substeince, whereby a part of itself is formed into a world. And this, he says, was the opinion of the ancient Gnostics and Priscillianists, and is for the most part of the Cabba- lists, of the new Adamites or the illuminated, and of an infinite number of Asiatic and Indian philosophers. III. To qualify the ill .savour of that second opinion which he follows, he would have us believe it to be the more creditable, than the (rejected) first, which he says is a new thing in the world, and that it was not born till some ages after Christ; which is gratis dictum. And whereas he tells us, he takes notice, that Tertullian was the first that maintained it against a Christian philosopher, who defended the eternal existence of matter; he had only reason to take notice, That the philosopher he mentions, was the first, that calling himself a Christian, had the con- fidence to assert an opinion so repugnant to Christianity and to all religion, and who therefore first gave so con- siderable an occasion to one who was a Christian indeed, to confute it. Nor was Hermogenes a much more credit- able name with the orthodox, ancient Christians, than those wherewith he graces the third opinion, besides the other ill company which might be assigned it, if that were a convictive way of fighting, by names. IV. And for what he adds. That Moses was, he dares say, of his opinion ; because he only gives such an account of the creation, as that it was made of an unformed pre- existent matter; and the Apostle Paul to the Hebrews, saying, God drew these visible things out of those that were not visible. He shows, indeed, more daringness than solid judgment, in venturing to say the one or the other upon so slender a ground. As if every thing were false, which Moses and Paul did not say. But it appears rather from his way of quoting, (who, it is like, did not much concern himself to turn over the leaves of the Bible, that he might be sure to quote right,) that God did create that unformed matter, as he calls it. For it is expressly said, God created heaven, and earth, and that this earth (not matter) was without form, and void. Gen. i. 1,2. And if this unformed earth and matter be, as with him it seems, all one, then the unformed matter is said to have been created. For God is said to have created that unformed earth; which must indeed pre-exist, unformed, to its be- ing brought into form, not imto all creation. And the same thing must be understood of the unformed heaven too, though Moses's design was to give us a more distinct account of what was nearer us, and wherein we were more concerned. And indeed, is seems most agreeable to the letter of the text, and to the following history, so to under- stand those words, " In the beginning God created heaven and earth," viz. That in the beginning he created that which afterwards became heaven and earth, i. e. unformed matter. For heaven and earth as now they are, or as they were in their formed state, were not created in a moment, in the very beginning ; but in several successive days, as the following history shows. And so much Tertullian aptly enough intimates to that Pseudo-Christian Her- mogenes, Terra; nomen redigit in maferiam, d^'C. Nor is Heb. xi. 3. capable of being tortured into any sense more favourable to his gross fancy, which (as the Greek text, if any will con.sult it, shows) "says not. The things that are seen were made of things not appearing, but were not made of things appearing. As to what he adds touching the word crcer. &c. I let it pass, not liking to contend about words often promiscuously used, but shall apply myself to the consideration of the thing in question, and show — 1. How inconsistently this author asserts inde- pendent matter, both with the truth and with himself— 2. How unnecessarily he doth it, and that the defence of the common cause against Spinosa did no way oblige him to it. V. FHrst, How inconsistently he asserts it, 1. With the truth of the thing; for, (1.) Whatsoever exists independently and necessarily, is infinite. And herein I must do Spinosa that right, as to acknowledge he hath, in asserting it, done right to truth; though the grounds upon which he asserts it, are most perniciously false. But I conceive it is capable of being clearly proved (and hath been proved. Part 1st) otherwise, i-iz. that necessary, self-originate being, is the root and fountain of all being, whetlier actual or possible ; since there is nothing actual brought into being, which is not actually from it, and nothing possible, but whose possi- bility depends upon it. And what virtually comprehends all being, actual and po.ssible, cannot but be infinite. For without the compass of such all-comprehending being, there is nothing to bound it. And what is bounded by nothing, is unboimded or infinite. Whereupon also, matter plainly appears not to be of itself. For if it were, for the same reason it must be infinite and all comprehending. But nothing were more apparently contradictious and self- repugnant, than the assertion of nvo all-comprehending beings ; and if there be but one, that matter is not that one. But that it must be a necessary, self-originate, intel- ligent Being, which is the root of all being, I conceive already suihciently proved in the former part of this dis- course. Wherein it is also shown, that finite created be- ings, arising from that infinite self-originate one, limit it not, nor do detract any thing from its infinity, but concur to evidence its infinity rather; inasmuch as they could never have been, had they not been before contained within the productive power of that increate self-originate Being. It is, by the way, to be noted that the notion of infinity we now intend, doth not merely import unconfinedness to this or that certain space, (though it include that too,) for that, alone, were a very maimed, defective notion of inhnitencss. But we understand by it the absolute all-comprehending profundity and plenitude of essence and perfection. Where- upon, it signifies nothing to the preserving entire the infi- nity of the self-originate, intelligent Being, only to suppose it such, as that it can permeate all the space that can be taken up by another (.supposed) self-originate being. For still, since its essence were of itself, it were not virtually contained in the other. Which therefore would evince that other not to be in the true sense infinite. Where- upon we, (2.) Proi^e the impossibility of independent, self-origi- nate matter, from the known, agreed notion of God, viz. That he is a Bei7ig absolutely perfect, or comprehensive of all perfection. Even they that deny his existence, confess (though to the contradiction of themselves) this to be the notion of the thing they deny. Now, though this Eissertor of independent matter acknowledges it a being essentially imperfect, he can only mean by that, less perfect ; not that it hath, simply, no perfection at all. 'Tis idle trifling to brangle about words. Perfection hath been wont to go for an attribute of being. He calls it a being; it must therefore have some perfection, some goodness, be of some value. Is it not better than nothing 1 Then, that perfec- tion must be eminently contained in God ; otherwise, how is he a Being comprehensive of all perfection 1 The imper- fections of matter belong not to him; nor of any thing else. For imperfection is nothing; nor do the perfections of any creature belong to him formally, or in the same special kind, hut eminently, and in a higher and more noble kind. And so, to have all being and perfection, either for his own, or within his productive power, cannot, without contradiction, be denied of him, who is confessed to be God. And again, to be able to create, is surelv a perfection. Omnipotency, more a perfection than partial impotenc}'. Wherefore to assert matter could not be cre- ated by God, is to assert an impotent, imperfect God. Or since God can be conceived under no other notion than of a Being absolutely perfect) to assert none at all. (3.) This supposition not only denies to God all perfec- tion, but it ascribes to matter, which he himself confesses the meanest sort of being, (as shortly it will be fitter to take further notice,) the high excellency of self-subsist- ence, the first and most fundamental of all divine per- fections. (4.) If matter be, as such, an independent, self-originate thing, then every part or particle of matter must be so. And then, let such matter be supposed to fill up infinite space, we shall have an infinite number of independent entities, co-existing for ever ; for a finite number cannot replenish infinite space : or let it be supposed (more agree- ably to the pretended sentiments of this author") confined within the limits of the formed universe: ana how un- 66 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part IL reasonably is such a thing as independent matter, sup- posed to be of itself, limited to one spot of immense space ! For let the universe be supposed finite, though ever so vast, it must yet be conceived but as a minute spot, to the infinite unbounded vacuity that lies without it ; and which yet he seems to acknowledge replenished with the Divine Being. Now let a man set himself to consider, and try how easy it will be to his thoughts to conceive one little portion of boundless space, taken up with a mean being, next to nothing, that is of itself there, and cannot but be there, and no where else, imposed upon the infinitely per- fect Being ; the all-wise and almighty God, who fills up all space unavoidably and from all eternity, so that he could not, if he thought it a cumber, disencumber or rid himself of it ; and rather seemed of necessity, than of choice, to have made a world of it, as not knowing else what to do with it ; with which imagination also the youth of the world so ill agrees, for why then was it so lately made? (5.) But it further seems very evident, and more fully evidential of the absurdity of this conceit, that if there were such matter, the world could never have been made of it. For how great alterations must such rude, undi- gested, unformed matter have undergone, in forming of such a world as this? But what greater inconsistency can we imagine, than that what exists necessarily, or of itself, should be alterable 1 What is of itself what it is, must be eternally and without change what it is. So absurd, as well as profane, it will be to ascribe to dull and senseless matter, or to any thing else, so peculiar and appropriate an attribute and name as that of the Deity, /«?« that lam. For, hereupon, such matter were not only supposed vainly and to no purpose, being never possible to be the matter of the world, but destructively, and against the very pur- pose that should be served by it. For such matter being supposed to occupy the space of the formed world, must exclude thence any other matter of which it could be formed ; and make it, consequently, impossible there should ever have been any such world as this, where the supposition itself makes it be. This see discoursed more at large, Part I. Chap. 2. (6.) And whereas his great reason for such self-originate, independent matter, viz. the imagined impossibility of creation, or that any thing can be produced out of nothing, (which so far as is needful, we partly have and further shall consider, in its proper place,) doth as much oppose the creation of^any spiritual being, as material. If all that hath been said in the former part of this discourse, and by many authors besides, do suificiently prove there are such spiritual or immaterial beings that are created, or are not of themselves ; and that, of the property of thought, which is found belonging to them, matter is not capable, (which I shall think to have been done till I see the contrary evinced,) we must judge him very absurdly to have as- serted such self-originate, independent matter. And as he hath asserted it very inconsistently with the truth of the thing ; so, VI. 2. It will appear he hath done it as little consist- ently with himself. For, (i.) He acknowledges God to be Vetre infiniment par- fait, tout jmissant, el le principe de toute perfection — a Being infinitely perfect, almighty, and the principle of all perfection. Now how is he infinitely perfect, if his being include not all perfection 1 How is he almighty, if he cannot create 1 How is he the fountain or principle of all perfection, if the perfection of matter (which, as hath been said, though he make it essentially imperfect, must have some perfection belonging to it, since it is not mere no- thing) be not eminently comprehended in his being? Besides that here acknowledging God to be omnipoten-t, and having denied the necessary, eternal, independent matter, which he imagines to be infinite, but limited and confined to the created universe only; I would hereupon demand of him, Cannot the blessed God, if he please, cre- ate many worlds 1 If he say, No, then how is he omni- potent ? — If Yea, of what matter must they be made ? Not of his (imagined) necessary, independent matter, for of that really none could : but according to him the present uni- b P. 47, 48. c P. 110. verse is made : it is already taken up, and pre-engaged therein, and it is limited thereto. Therefore the matter ii yet to be created, of which the other worlds are to be made . and it can be so, otherwise no more worlds can be made; and thereupon the great God is, not without blasphemy, said to have gone to the utmost of his power, to have done in this kind all that he can. And this must be said, by this author, in express contradiction to the truth of the thing, to the most common and agreed idea or notion of the Divine Being ; and now, most apparently, to himself. And therefore his high rant against Spinosa,b (in this point more orthodox than himself,) That he confounds in his philosophy being and perfection, Prctcndant que, ce qui est, et ne rcnferme aucune negation d'etre, est une perfec- tion, (^c. — Pretending that whatsoever is, and includes not in lis notion any negation of being, is a perfection, <^c. i" vain, and as much without cause, as what he afterwardf, says about it is without sense. For he adds, That for hii, part he finds nothing more false or extravagant; and why so ? Because then pain and sorrow must be reckoned among perfections, and such real perfections as are worthy of God, or a Being infinitely perfect. And upon this, he triumphs over such men, as supplanters of the Deity, in- stead of defenders of so great a Being, and as having lost their senses and their reason, &c. But if he had not lost his own, and abandoned himself to that fury and rage ol insolence which he there inaputes to his opposers, he might have been capable of so much calm and sober considera- tion, as to have bethought himself, that among creatures, a sense of pain, real grief and sorrow, correspondent to their present, true causes, import more perfection, than stupidity, insensibleness, and apathy; and if so, though pain and grief cannot formally agree to the most perfect being of God, to whom their causes cannot agree, that the life and percipiency do eminently agree to him, by which he can apprehend an injury, though not a real hurt, (which he can therefore only not apprehend, not because the per- ceptive principle is wanting, but the object, ") and by the power of imparting whereof, he is able to maKe a creature capable of pain and grief, where the objects shall (as they may deservedly) occur, and meet the perceptive principle; and that the power of making such a creature, is a greater perfection than an impotency of doing it. Which perfec- tion therefore, he could not, consistently with himself, deny to God, having acknowledged him a Being infinitely perfect, or comprehensive of all perfection. Nor, (2.) Doth he assert necessary increate matter, consist- ently with his own reasonings for the possibility of a vacu- um,c where he takes it for granted, that God can aneantir une petite partie de la matiere, d^c. — annihilate some s'tnall particle of matter, one stone, for example, or one grain of sand. Which how ridiculously is it supposed, by one who supposes such matter necessarily self-existent ! For who sees not that necessity of existence, and impossibility of non-existence, do infer one another, or signify rather the same thing. Therefore, no man, except Spinosa, could be at once more daring and more unhappy than this author. And as it hath thus appeared, that he hath asserted such self-originate, independent matter, very inconsistently both with the truth of the thing and himself; so, VII. Secondly, It will also appear he hath done it very unnecessarily ; " and particularly, without that necessity which he pretends of answering Spinosa. For there is no necessity of it so much as pretended, upon any account besides that of the common maxim, that nothing can come out of nothing ; the sense whereof must first be inquired before it can be understood, how far it will serve his pur- pose, or infer the necessity of independent matter. The sense of it must either be this — That a being could never arise out of no-being, of itself, without a pre-existent, cre- ative cause ; whichis most evidently true, but as evidently not to his purpose : or this — That what once "was not, could never be produced into being by a pre-existent, omnipotent Cause : which were to his purpose, but is evidently, and by apparent self-contradiction, untrue.^ And what can make it have so much as the least sem- blance of truth 1 Either the authority of the maxim, or some plausible reason. For its authority; though that d of thia fee at \ajffi Dr. Cudwoitli's Intellectual System. Chap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 67 which he claims lo it of the ancient philosophers were little considerable, if ever so truly claimed, we have no ground to think it otherwise claimed than most untruly. Its authority, as he represents it, depends upon a worse authority. He is so modest as to expect it to be believed, upon his bare word, that this was the opinion of all the ancient philosophers before Christ's time; while yet he thinks not fit to tell us his name. But if their reasonings from it be considered, that generations are out of matter, and corruptions are into matter, we have no cause to ap- prehend they understood it otherwise than that natural agents did neither create nor annihilate any thing. Besides that, there is positive ground enough to ^conclude, that the more instructed and wiser pagans, long before Christ's time, did believe all things to have sprang from one intel- ligent, self-subsisting original, matter itself not being ex- cepted. As, with the Egj-ptians, the inscription of the temple at Sais shows, " I am all that is, or was, or shall be," &c. and with the Grecians, their worshipping God, under the name of Pan ; which could mean no other thing, than that they thought the Deity to comprehend eminently or virtually all beings besides, in its creatire or productive poM^er. And we have reason to think that pagan philosophers since Christ, such as Hierocles, Jam- blichus, Porphyry, Plotinus, &c. who (as others have observed) were manifestly of this .sentiment, understood the minds of the more ancient philosophers as well as this Monsieur ; nor do they pretend to contradict them herein. And for the reason of the thing itself, he hath not the least appearance of any on his part, but that, because the finite power of a creature cannot bring a thing out of no- thing, therefore omnipotency cannot ; which is so far from concluding for him, that (as hath been intimated) it mani- festly contradicts itself, and concludes the contrary. For how" is that omnipotency, which cannot do everything that implies not a contradiction 1 And how is that a con- tradiction, that what once was not, should afterwards come to be 1 there being no objective impossibility or intrinsic repugnancy in the thing itself to exist, but that it were truly ens possib)le ; (and we are out of doubt concerning matter for instance, or whatsoever else we are sure doth exist, ;hat it could exist;) and supposing also that there be a suf- ficient, causative power, to make it exist, or produce it into being : and what cause can be more sufficient than an om- nipotent one, such as our author confesses God to bel Nor doth he deny that there are intelligent spirits, that were not of themselves; only he would have us think them but finer matter, impres.sed with intellectual power. But what akin is a mind to matter, except his own 1 And supposing a mind or intellect be stamped upon matter, it is then but added to it, not drawn out of it, as if matter had before contained it. And even thus, since mind or intellect is not nothing, (unless he will say, himself diflfers by nothing from unthinking clay,) we have something out of nothing. And who can think it more impossible to Omnipotency, to create matter, than a mind 1 But if he reckon thought, or intellect, is contained in matter, or included in the notion of it, then matter, as such, must be intelligent, and consequently all matter ; and this will be absurdity enough, to give him as good a title to the privilege of not being reasoned against, as, from his magisterial way of writing, we may count Spinosa thought himself to have. Nor indeed will it leave any man so much as a conjecture at the reason why he should pretend to differ from him. For who can imagine, why his matter, endued with the attributes of extension and thought, might not do as well as Spinosa's substance 1 Or if he think matter, as such, to have only seminal reason or intellect in it, antecedently to his supposed di- vine impress upon it, how will that agree with his making it essentiellevient imparfatt ,'' — essenlial/y impcrf(>ct ? Or what means his added capable neunmnins, its he'mg never- theless capable of all such perfections by the impression of God upon it 1 Is that capacity something, or nothing 1 Or what sense is it to make it capable of having those per- fections, which it is essential to it not to have 1 And surely, as he will attribute to matter more perfec- tion than he intended, so he will attribute less to God. For he will, at this rate, attribute no more to him. than hath been generally ascribed to ordinary natural agents ; i.e. to produce into actual being, out of matter, that whereto there was in it some seminal disposition before. And here, indeed, is the S(jurce of his error, his reducing infinite power to the measures of finite ; an insolent pre- suming to circumsciibe Omnipotenc}', and making that simply impossible even lo Almightir^ess itself, which is only so to created agents. And to this purpose, I find some reasonings in Sextus Empiricus, who tells us how the sceptics attempted to prove (besides their disputing against the other three sorts of causation) that dawfiaToi — an incorporeal thing, cannot be uitiov otj'tjiaToi — the cause of any thing corporeal ; arguing (and slightly enough) from the common methods of subordinate agents, to the opera- tions of the Supreme Cause. Nor is it apprehensible, how one can find a medium ; or while they make matter in- dependent, how not to make God dependent. And when the Monsieur we are concerned with took a friendly notice of Hermogenes's consent with him upon this subject, he might as well have been at the pains to consider somewhat of what Tertullian wrote anainst him, that hereby, in some respect, God is made inferior and svbject to matter, when without it he coaild not hare made a world. Materia superior invenilur, qua illi capiam ope- randi subministravit, et Deus subjectus materia yidetur, cujus substantia eguit ; nemo non subjicitur ei cujus eget, (f-c.f — Every one is subject to what he stands in need of. CHAPTER III. The reason of what next follows. Directions to readers not wont to inquire into the grounds of their reli^on. A summary and plainer proposal unto such, of what hath been said in the former Part, concerning God's existence and conversableness with men. The reasonableness (so much beine already evinced) of alleging, and rebing upon the te.stimony of the Holy Scnptures. The expressness of that testimony concerning the unity ot the Godhead, the trinity therein The absolute perfection of the Divine Nature. The infimle- iiess of God's knowledge, power, goodness, and presence. His propensions towards men. and aptness (supposing there were no obstruction) to human converse. Matters of doubt herein resoh-ed. I. And having thus far established and vindicated so principal a ground-work in this important cause, — That what is necessarily, or of itself, is an absolutely perfect Being, di.stinct from all things else ; and a proper Object of religion, or whereto a temple, and all the worship there- of, duly belong, I shall now only suffer myself to be a little further diverted from my intended course, apprehend- ing that their case is also to be considered, who have been less accustomed to this course, of reasoning out to them- selves the principles of their religion: unto whom there- fore what hath been hitherto attempted may seem, if not obscure in its parts, yet so tiresome in the whole, as not to meet with patience enough to trace ihe design that hath been driven on, to its issue and period; it being very in- cident to unexercised and less attentive readers, to lose their thread, and forget the scope of a discourse, and so still have the truth to seek even in the midst of it. And if what hath been hitherto said, prove unsatisfying to any, that justice must be done to the cause itself and to them, as to avow it must rather proceed either from this infirmity in the reader, or from the unskilfulness of the writer to propound things happily and to advantage ; than either from the inevidence of the things themselves, or frrm want of capacity, even in an ordinary understanding. Nor doth any undertaking seem more feasible, or less to be despaired of, than plainly and satisfyingly to evince, to an unprejudicecl understanding that shall attend, these first foundations of a religion and a temple, vi~. That God is; and — That he is conversable with men. or is such as is capable and apt to receive worship from men, and impart blessedness to them. We shall therefore so far interrupt the current of this discourse, as to endeavour this, by giving a brief and plain sum of the more principal things that have been said to this purpose already. And to pre- f Tertull. contra Hemiog. 68 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part IL pare for it, must desire you that have not been, as yet, wont to employ your minds this way, to observe the fol- lowing directions : First, That you would not give place to discourage- ment, nor think too meanly of the understanding whereby God hath distinguished you from the inferior creatures. There is that mind and spirit in man, which doth compass many things of far greater difficulty than it is here to be employed about ; though it can be exercised about nothing of so great consequence. That apprehensive power that can take in the orderly frame of such notions as are requi- site to the exact skill of numbering or of measuring things, of navigation, of trade, of managing the common afiairs of human life ; that can lay down to itself such prudent maxims and rules whereby the inconveniences may in great part be avoided which are incident to common con- versation, and the advantages gained which may serve one's own private and secular interests ; that understand- ing which can do all this, would far more easily compre- hend as much as is needful to the certain knowledge of God's existence, and that he is such as we ought to wor- ship, and may enjoy, if it apply itself hereto. Do not so despair as not to make an attempt ; you know not the strength of your own mind till you have tried it. Secondly, That you indulge not, or do not suffer your- selves to be insensibly seized by, a mean and sordid sloth. Set your thoughts a-work with vigorous diligence. Give not out before you have well begun. Resolve, since you have a thinking power about you, you will use it to this most necessary purpose ; and hold your thoughts to it. See that your minds do not presently tire and flag ; that you be rationally peremptory, and soberly obstinate, in this pursuit : yield not to be diverted. Disdain, having minds that can reach up to the great Original and Author of all things, that they should be confined to this dirty earth, or only to things low and mean. Thirdly, Look on the things that are rationally evident to your understandings, as equally certain with what you see with your eyes. Are you not as sure that two and two make four (which judgment is the act of your mind) as that this thing which you look upon is black or white, or of this or that shape or figure 1 Do not so debase your own understandings, as to think nothing certain that comes under their judgment. It is true, they are apt enough to be deceived in many things, and so is your sense too; but if your sense could make you certain of nothing, what would become of justice and government among men % Who could take an oath before a magistrate 1 What would become of the common actions and affairs of life 1 How could you eat or drink, or buy or sell, if you could not certainly distinguish one thing from another ? Some things are so plain as that you can be in no doubt about them, as that this is bread, not a stone ; that a horse, not a sheep ; otherwise all the world must stand still, and all commerce and action cease. And if there were not some things sure to your minds, that you may ccrlainly say, in some plain cases at least, this is true and that false, this right and that wrong, you would be at as great a loss. Otherwise, you might be apt to think a part of a thing greater than the whole, or that the same man might be at London and at Rome at the same time; and you might be as ready to kill your own father as to do him rever- ence, or to commit robbery upon your rich neighbour as relieve the poor, and judge the one as good an action as the other. Fourthly, As any particular thing is offered to you, for the purpose we are here aiming at, consider it well by itself, before you go further; and think thus. Is this plain and certain, yea or no 1 If at the first sight you think it not so, observe diligently what is brought for the proof of it, and see whether now it be not manifestly certain ; and when you once find it is, fix it in your mind as a certain- ty ; say. Thus far I am sure. Let not your thoughts run back to this as a doubtful thing any more, or unravel their own work; but make use of it as a certainty, to your further purpose. II. Being thus prepared, take this brief account of what hath before been discoursed more at large. And, First, As to this first and great principle, — That there is a God. Be but patient of being led by the hand a few easy steps in a way that is in some part sufficiently beaten, however, that is sufficiently plain, and it is to be hoped you will soon see that matter put out of all doubt. Let this then be your first step : 1. That somewhat or other there is, that hath been from all eternity necessarily and of itself, without dependence upon any thing else. If this be not at the first view evi- dent to you. or if it seem too large a step, we will divide it into parts; and consider well what is said for the proof of it, by these degrees. (1.) Somewhat or other must ever have been; for other- wise, how could anything come to be at all? Do you think it was possible, if ever there was nothing at all in being, of one sort or other, that any thing should have come into being 1 No surely, for which way should it bel It could not be made by another, there being no other to make it ; and it could not make itself, itself being as yet nothing. But sure you can easily apprehend, that to make a thing be, is to do something ; and as easily, that Avhat is nothing, can do nothing. Therefore, when your eyes tell you that something now is, you maybe as sure, as of what you see with your eyes, that somewhat or other hath ever been. Say with j'ourself. Somewhat now is, therefore some- what hath ever been. If you discern not the clearness of this consequence, take the opposite to it : Nothing now is, therefore nothing will ever he ; it is as broad as long. (2.) You may next proceed thus, that something or other hath been of itself ; that is, Mnthout depending upon any thing else, or being beholden to any other thing for its being. Now here pause awhile, and consider what is said to make this plain to you. Either you must acknow- ledge something hath ever been of itself, or yon must say that all things that are, or ever have been, were fromano- ther, without any exception. But mark now, if you say that all things that are, or ever have been, without except- ing any, were from another, you contradict yourself; for besides all things that are, or ever have been, Avithout ex- cepting any, there is not another from whom they could be. Therefore it is impossible that all things without ex- ception should have been from another ; whence then it is plain that something must have been of itself, without de- pending for its being upon any thing else : for it will come to the same contradiction, if }''ou say all things depend upon some other ; since there is nothing beyond all things : therefore, to say that all things depend, is to say they de- pend on nothing, that is, they do not depend. And to say they have all depended on one another for their being, or made one another, is altogether as absurd; for it will make the whole compass or circle of all being to depend upon nothing, or come at length to this, that some one made itself, or even (which is more gross) made its own maker; unless you will rest in some one that made all the other, and was itself not made by any of them. If you do not apprehend this yourself, desire any one that hath a better understanding to explain it to you, and you will soon see the matter intended by it to be as evident as your heart can wish. And so this will be out of question with you — That somewhat was oiitself ; which added to what was proved before, comes to this — That somewhat was ever of itself And both these thus conjoined, plainly ap- pear from what hath been said. For we have seen that nothing could possibly make itself, (which would absurdly imply, that before, it both was and was not,) and therefore, whatsoever was of itself, must ever have been, or never had beginning of being. So much, then, I suppose you take to be most certain, that something hath ever been of itself Whereupon )'ou may further add, (".) That what was ever of itself, was necessarily. I hope you understand what is meant by being necessarily, that is, being so as that it could not possibly but be. You may perceive that some things are so as that it was possi- ble they might not have been, as a house, a town, a gar- ment, or whatsoever was made by such makers as might have chosen whether they would have made it, or no. Yea, or whatsoever is any way made to be, having before not been ; for what once was not, it is manifest it was then possible for it not to be. But to be necessarily, is to be so as that it could never possibly but have been; that is, what is necessarily, is somewhat of so excellent a nature, as that it could never be out of being. Now what was Chap. III. THE LIVING TEMPLE. ever of itself, it was in this sense necessarily ; viz. so as that the excellency of its nature was such, as could never permit that it should not be ; whence the name I AM agrees peculiarly and always thereunto. Nothing can other- wise be of itself, (not by making itself, which you have seen is impossible,) but' by an everlasting possession of that excellency of being, which excludes all possibility of not being. It depends upon no one's choice or power, whether that which is of itself shall be or not be. (4.) What hath thus ever been nccessarilJ/, still is, and will ever be ; which is plain upon the same ground. What could never but be, can never but be ; for its nature is such, as whereto not to be is impossible. Otherwise, if its nature had not been such, there being nothing else by which it should be made, it could never have been. Wherefore thus far you have firm footing in this first step ; no part of the ground which it measures shakes un- der you. You may say you are sure of this — That some- what there now is, that hath been from all eternity neces- sarily and of itself, without dependence upon any thing else, and that can never ceai>e to be. — Set this down there- fore for a certainty, and then add to it, 2. That whatsoever is not necessarily and of itself, is from and by that which is necessarily and of itself, as the first Author and Cause thereof. This is so certain, that nothing needs to be said for the proof of it more than hath been said already, so that you do but understand the meaning of it; which you cannot but do, if you consider that all things that are, or ever were, must be of one of these two sorts, viz. what was of itself, and what was not of itself, but from another : therefore, what is not of the first sort, must be of the second ; that is, what was not of itself, must be from another ; and then, what other must it be from'? Surely from what was of itself, as its first and chief cause, whatsoever inferior or secondary causes it may have had besides, that were before it, caused by that first. So that you have now plainly before you, and in view, some or other eternal, necessary Being, not only to be con- sidered as it is in itself, but as the original and root of all besides. Then go forward a little, and further add, 3. Neither this visible world, nor any thing of it, is ne- cessarily, or of itself, without depending upon any thing else; and was therefore created and made by some more excellent Being that was so, and is quite distinct and diverse from it. That this may be evident to you, con- sider, (1.) That whatsoever is changeable or imperfect, and capable of becoming more perfect, is not necessarily, and of itself, without dependence on any thing else. For what is of itself necessarily, and without dependence on any other, must have whatsoever belongs to it, all at once ; for from whence should any addition or change happen any way to it 1 Not from any other, for it no more depends on another for addition, than it is liable to diminution by another, being what it is necessarily, or from itself: for nothing can impart or add what it hath not ; and what it hath was in it before, and was in it necessarily, and there- fore unalterably, and without possibility' of any change. Now you know this visible world is continually changing, and in an imperfect state ; and we may add, that there is somewhat invisible, of whose present being we are certain, that was not of itself, and that did not make this world. For instance, we are certain of the present being of our o-wTi mind and spirit, which we cannot see with our eyes, but by self-reflection we are sure we have somewhat in us that can think. Nor is there any thing that comes under our immediate, certain observation, more excellent than man himself, especially his mind and soul. And do vou not yourself know, and find how changeable, indigent, and imperfect that is"? Therefore you maybe sure it is not of itself, or the maker of this visible world. If all the men in the world should join all their wit and pov/er together, which way would they go to work to make such a world as thisl yea, or even to make one single pile of grass, or grain of sand 1 Which way can you devise, then, they should make the .sun or stars, or such an earth as this? It is plain, then, that all this world had a maker, distinct from itself (2.) Whatsoever being is of itself, is more excellent than what is not of itself This 3'ou cannot but assent to at the first sight : for besides that you must needs acknowledge it better to live of oneself, than to be beholden to another, you must also know that whatever being is not of itself, hath no excellency in it, but what was in that being that was of itself before ; and therefore it had in it all the ex- cellency that is in such things as proceeded from it, (una- bated because in it necessarily,) together with the proper excellency of its own being, "whereas the other sort of beings have but their own derived excellency only. Wherefore this also is most evident, that this world had a maker distinct from and more excellent than itself, that changes not, and whereto that name most properly agrees, I AM THAT I AM. Being sure of this, you may pro- ceed, and conclude, 4. That the things which are manifestly not of them- selves, but created and made, do plainly show that the Maker of them doth excel in power, wisdom, and good- ness. The greatness of his works shows his mighty power; the nature, exactness, and order of them, his admirable wisdom ; and his own self-sufficiency, and independency on the things made, show his rich and vast goodness in making them, as you may see more at large in Part I. Now therefore, if you have attended, you cannot but find you are sure and at a plain certainty concerning these four things : (I.) That somewhat was ever, and is necessarily. Ci.') That what was not so did arise from that which was. (3.) That this w'orld being not so, did therefore spring from that eternal, necessary, self-subsisting Being. (4.) And that this Being hath those particular excellences, whereof there are the manifest appearances and footsteps in the works that are made by him, (viz. especially power, wis- dom, and goodness,) in himself. And thus the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood bj^ the things that are made, even his eternal power and godhead ; so that they who see them not are without excuse. Rom. i. 20. If 5-ou be sure that any thing is, you may be sure somewhat was ever of itself: if you be sure any thing that was not of itself hath appearances of power, wisdom, and goodness in the frame of it, you may be sure that Being which was of itself is thB powerful, wise, and good Creator and Maker of it. It is to be hoped, then, you are at a certaintj-, — That God is. III. Secondly, And now as to the second principle, that hath been insisted on also in the former Part, — That this God is conversable with men. You cannot surely doubt, but that he that made you, and gave j-ou all that any way belongs to your being, can apply himself to you, or any of his creatures, in a way suitable to the natures which he hath put into you and them; nor that he is read}- to con- verse with you, in a way suitable to the nature he hath given you, if you be such towards him, and so apply yourself to him, as you ought. For it is not a greater thing to do so, nor more exceeding or going beyond the reach of his power, wisdom, and goodness, as you cannot but see, than to have given being to 3'ou, and a.il things. But now if what is further discoursed in that former Part, concerning the oneness of the Divine Being, and the infiniteness thereof, or concerning any other perfec- tions there particularly asserted unto it, seem not so plain to you as is requisite to guide and facilitate your applica- tions to him ; what hath been more plainly said in this, ia however sufficient, as more primarih' fundamental and pre-requisite to that further knowledge of liis nature and will towards you, which in another way is to be had and sought after. A cloud and darkness are now drawn over the world of mankind; and though it be still very easily discernible that God is, it is yet more difficult to attain to so distinct apprehensions u-hat he is, as are necessary to our convers- ing with him. Against this difficulty, he hath aflbrded a gracious relief ; that is, he hath pi ovided there should be a more express discovery of him extant among men, than can be collected bj' their making observations upon this world. The case was such with man, (grown now so great a stranger to God,) as to require a written revelation of his nature and will ; and we have it in those scriptures which bear with us the name of the word of God. It were in- deed very unseasonable and absurd, to urge their authority in the inquiry, whether there be a God or no 1 For what THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. authority have they more than other writings, bat as they are God's word 1 Therefore to expect or give assent to them as such, vsrhile yet it remains an undecided contro- versy, whether there be any such one, or no, for whose sake the assent should be given, were to expose our reli- gion, not to prove it. These holy writings were not in- tended, by their affirmation of it, to inform us of God's existence, which they suppose, and do not prove, as a thing we may otherwise be certain of; but to teach us our duty towards him, and what our expectations may be from him ; and do therefore give us a true representation and discovery of his nature, (so far as it was needful for us preparatively first to know it,) and then next, of the pre- sent state of things between him and us, that we might be directed how to apply ourselves to him suitably to both the one and the other. It is true, that we can never know that there is a God, without knowing somewhat of his nature, or what a one he is. We cannot so much as in- quire whether he be or no, but we must have some notion in our minds of the thing we inquire about ; and so much as is necessary to this purpose, may be plainly gathered in the way we have gone hitherto. For if we understand the diflerence between something and nothing, between being and no being, and find that something is, or that there is some being ; and again, if we understand the difference between a thing's being of itself, and being of or from another, and find the former must be the original of t-he latter, we cannot but understand ourselves, when we say there is an Original Being. And having some under- standing what is meant by power, wisdom, and goodness; withal finding that not only the effects of these, but these very things themselves, are in the world, we cannot but be sure (because these things come not of nothing) that the Original Being is powerful, wise, and good. And now when we have thus found out an Original Being, that is of wisdom, power, and goodness sulficient to be the Author of such a world as this, we at once know both what God is, (sufficiently to distinguish him from all things else,) and are at a certainty that he is. When we perceive that he hath given to all breath and being and all things ; we have sought, and even felt and found him out, and found that he is not far from any one of us, since in him we live and move and have our being ; that he is every where present, in this his creation, as the great Sustainer and the Life of the universe ; and foras- much especially as we are his oflspring, (as even the light of a heathen poet could reach to discover, a sort of intelli- gent, designing, active beings,) that therefore the Godhead is not like silver, or gold, &c., but of a nature more nearly resembling that of our own souls, and the higher excel- lences of the best of his creatures although eminently con- taining in himself also all the real perfections, virtues, and powers of all the re.st. When we understand so much of God, (as we may by the light of our own reason,) we un- derstand enough to give a fuvuulation to religion, and to let us see he ought to have a temple, and worship ; and another sort of temple than is made by men's hands, other worship Ihan can be performed by the hands of men; as is there clearly argued, and inferred by the apostle, upon those plain grounds. Now when we are arrived thus far, it is seasonable to make use of the further help which we may observe the great, and wise, and good God to have most condescendingly,^ most aptly, and most mercifully afforded us, for our more distinct understanding of his nature, and our own state ; and how we are to behave our- selves towards him thereujion. IV. Taking notice therefore that there is a written reve- lation of him extant in the world, that bears his name, and gives itself out to be from him ; if now we look into it, observe the import and design of it, compare it with what we before knew of his nature and our own ; consider what is most obvious to an easy self-reflection in our own state and case, and how exactly this written revelation agrees and corresponds to those our former notices ; taking in withal the many considerations that concur besides, to evidence to us the divine original and authority thereof: we camiot but have much rational inducement and obliga- a If we take notice that in some parts of this volume there are very ancient predictions, of the strongest and most unhliely events, that we see exactly ful- filled in the other parts. tion to receive, with all reverence and gratitude, this reve- lation, as from God ; and to rely upon it, as a sure and sacred light sent down from heaven, to direct us in all our concernments God-ward. For finding our own great need of such additional light, and apprehending it sufficiently agreeable to the divine goodness to afford it, and expecting it to be sufh, in its scope and design, as we find it is: if we further consider it must have had some author, and perceiving it not easy, with any plausible pretence, to affix it to any other than to God himself; if we consider that it was impossible it could be invented by men, without some design of self-advantage, either iu this world or in the other; and how absurd any such expectation must be, either from men here, (the contents thereof being so re- pugnant to the common inclinations o-f men, as to oblige those that owned them to the severest sufferings on that account,) or from God hereafter, who could not be expected to reward forgery, falsehood, and the usurpation of his name : if, again, we further observe the positive attesta- tions whereby he hath challenged and owned it as his own, and wherein the divine power hath borne witness to the divine truth contained in it : if the matters of fact on which all depends appear not less certain than that there were men and nations in the world, that we have not seen, and before we were born; if we see it not only improbable, but even next to impossible, that the records of those mi- raculous attestations should have been forged, and nations imposed upon thereby ; and amongst them, many of the wisest of men in those very times when the things recorded were alleged to have been done, and in a matter wherein their eternal hope was concerned ;.'' we shall upon the whole see cause to judge. That as it were most absurd to suppose such a revelation given by God, and no sufficient rational evidence withal given that it is from him, (without which it cannot serve its end, and s'O would signify no- thing,) so that there is nothing wanting, in divine estimate itself, to make up such a sufficient, rational evidence ; nor in our own, unless we would suppose it necessary that every man should have a Bible reached him down by an immediate hand from heaven, or make some other .suppo- sition as fond and vain as that ; or that we count not that sufficient evidence, which ought to satisfy our reason, if it do not gratify our fancy and curiosity too. It is not fit, here, to say more of the divine original of those holy writings, nor needful ; so much being written already,b with so great clearness, on that subject, by many. That therefore being out of question what you cannot reason out yourselves, or apprehend from the reasonings of others, concerning God's nature, tending to represent him worthy of a temple with you, and capable of receiving and re- warding your sincere and spiritual worship, fetch out from that divine volume ; for you may be sure, though you cannot search him out imto perfection, he perfectly understands himself, and is certainly such, as he there tells you he is : and he there reveals himself to be such, as to whom the temple and worship we here intend, cannot be doubted (as he hath ordered things) to be both dxie and grateful. Whatever might be otherwise matter of doubt, is, by his express discovery of himself, taken away. V. If it were still a doubt, after all that hath been for- merly said for the reasoning out of these things, whether the Deity be one only, or manifold; whether the world had but one, or had not many makers ; and so, whether there be no danger of misapplying our religion, or of mistaking the object of our worship. This word plainly tells us. There is but 07ic God, the Father, of whom are all things. 1 Cor. viii. 6. That he is God, and there is none else. Isa. xiv. 21, 22. And that however there be three that bear witness in heaven, and the stamp of whose name is, in our baptism, distinctly and solemnly put upon us ; Matt, xxviii. 1 John v. yet (as in many other instances, that may be in some respect three, which in some other respect is but one) without the unnecessary, punctual de- claration, how these are three, and how but one, it ex- pressly tells us, these three are 07ie. And if it be yet a doubt with us (in which the reasonings of some may be too short to determine and resolve them) b Dr. Stillingfleet, in his Origines .Sacrae, Grotius de Verit. Chr. Relis. Hiief. Demonstr. Evangel. &c. Mr. Baxter's Reasons of Cluiatian Religion. With many more. Chap. IV. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 71 whether this one God be so absolutely and every way per- fect as to be sufficient for us all ; whether he can under- stand all our concernments, relieve us in all our necessi- ties, hear our prayers, satisfy our desires, receive our ac- knowledgments and thanksgivings, and take notice with what love and sincerity they are tendered unto him ; or, if he can do for us according to our necessities, and rea- sonable desires ; whether we have any ground to believe that he will ; this word of his plainly assures us. That he is God all-sufficient. Gen. xvii. 1. ; that he halh all fulness in him. It often represents him to us, under the name of the Lord God Almighty ; tells us that he can do every thing, and that he doth whatsoever it pleaseth him. It tells us his understanding is infinite, and particularly as- sures that he searches the hearts of men, and tries their reins; that they cannot think a thought, or speak a word, but he understands them afar off, and knows them alto- gether : that his eyes are upon all the ways of men ; that he knows all things, and therefore knows if they love him: And that we may be the more fully put out of doubt how easy it is to him to do so, we are assured. That he is everywhere present, that he fills heaven and earth, that the heaven, and heaven of heavens, cannot contain him ; that there is no going from his Spirit, or flying from his presence ; that if one go up to heaven, he is there ; lie down in hell, he is there ; go to the uttermost part of the sea, yet there his hand shall lead, and his right hand hold him. VI. And that all doubt may vanish, concerning his will and gracious inclination, how expressly doth he make himself known by his name 1 viz. That he is the Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, &c. Exod. xxxiv. 7. And by the same blessed and inspired penman of a part of these holy writings, (the beloved disciple, who lay in the bosom of his only-begotten Son ; who also is in the bosom of the Father, and hath declared him,) we are not only told that God is Light, whereby the knowledge, purity, simplicity, and glory of the Divine Being are represented ; but also, once and again, that God is Love, that we might imder- stand him as a Being not of more glorious excellency in himself, than of gracious propensions towards his creatures. And lest it should be thought our meanness should ex- empt us, and put us beneath his regard, we are told. He taketh care for sparrows, he heareth the ravens when they cry ; and generally, that the eyes of all wait upon him, and he gives them their meat in season, Psal. cxlv. (which even the brute creatures are emphatically said to seek of God,) and that he opens his hand, and satisfies the desires of every living thing, Psal. civ. And besides what he hath so expressly testified concerning his own nature, his favourable inclinations towards men might sufficiently be collected from that ver}' nature which he hath given to man, considered in comparison and reference to his own ; that he made him in his own image ; and that he being the Father of spirits, hath placed a spirit in man, so agree- able to his own spiritual nature ; and by his own inspira- tion given him that understanding, that the mind begotten corresponds, by its most natural frame and constitution, to the mind that begot, the vovi naTpiKds,<^ (as it was anciently called,) his mm Eternal Mind ; and that if its own origi- nal be remembered, it turns itself towards him, seeks his acquaintance by an instinct he halh himself implanted in it, and cannot rest till he have such a temple erected in it, where both he and it may cohabit together. By all this, his aptness to that converse with men, which is imported in the notion of a temple, doth so far appear, that at least it is evident such converse cannot fail to ensue, supposing that there w^re nothing in the way that might be a present obstruction thereto. And it will more appear, when we have considered (since there is somewhat that obstructs this converse) what he hath done to remove the obstruc- tion, and how he hath provided that the intercourse may be restored, and his temple be resettled with men, upon everlasting foundations. e Hieroc. a Poms and Penia. CHAPTER IV, That tlicre is an obstrurlion to this intercourse. The method of the following discourse. Man s aposlacy from God, and the vitiated slate of hie nature ; not only repreHented in the saorcd wrilinifs, but also ucknowledKcd and la- mented liy pagans :— very nii.stakeiily, in some resftecls ; wherein periiapa some of them not justly understood. This not the pnnjitive state of man : therefore not to be imputed to (he Author of nature. The trmple of God herebybecame unfit for the divine presence. Unsuitable. Disafll-cted. Here- upon forsaken, and most justly. I. But so far it is, that there should want probability of a very inward commerce between God and man, that we have reason to think it rather strange, considering his na- ture and our own, it should not have been continual; and that his unbounded and self-communicative fulness was not by him always afforded, and always imbibed and drawTi in by so capable and indigent a creature. One would wonder what should have di.sconlinued this intercourse ! What can be so apt to give and flow out, as fulness 1 What should be so apt to receive and take in, as w^ant and emptiness 1 Sucji a commerce then as can be supposed between one* that is rich and full, and them that are poor and necessitous, one would think should have never failed. So a fabulous dream may be significant, and not unin- structive, touching the reason and w^ay of commerce be- tween God and creature. We are therefore put upon at new inquiry, and need no longer spend ourselves in anxious thoughts. Can there be any converse between God and men 1 That w-e ma)' rather say. How can it not bel or. How strange is it there is not more ! that he hath not a temple in every human breast, repleni.shed with his vital presence ! that there are notliing but ruins and desolation to be fotmd, where one would expect a fabric worthy of God, and an in-dwelling Deity ! This must therefore be the sad subject of our thoughts awhile, What halh render- ed the blessed God so much a stranger on earth, and occa- sioned him in so great part to forsake his terrestrial dwelling 7 Whence we shall have the advantage (seeing how just cause there was, on his part, for this deplorable distance) to adore the grace that returns him to us, and inclined him to take that strange course, which we find he did, to repair his forlorn temple, and fill this desolate, forsaken world with the joyful sound of those glad tidings, " The tabernacle of God is with men." II. We shall find he is no further a stranger in this world, than as w-e have made and continued him so : _^no further a home-dweller in it, than as by an admirable con- trivance of wisdom and love, that will be the eternal won- der of the other world, he hath made way for himself: whereby his propensions towards men, prevailing against so great an obstruction, do even now appear at once both evident and marvellous, and ought to be not only the matter of our belief, but admiration. Wherefore our discourse must here proceed by these steps, to show — \. That mankind hath universally revolted, and been in a state of apostacy from God ; — 2. That hereby the temple of God in man hath been generally made waste and desolate; — 3. That he hath laid both the new founda- tians and the platform of his present temple in Immanuel, God with ns, his own incarnate Son, who rebuUds, beau- tifies, furnishes, inhabits it, and orders all the concern- ments of it. III. \. The first we do little need to labour in — every man's own reflection upon the vitiated powers of his own soul, would soon, as to himself, ptit the matter out of doubt ; whence each one's testimony concerning his own case, would amount to a universal testimony. No man that takes a view of his owti dark and blinded mind, his slow and dull apprehension, his uncertain staggering judg- ment, roving conjectures, feeble and mistaken reasonings about matters that concern him most ; ill inclinations, propension to what is unlawlul to him and destructive, aversion to his truest interest and best good, irresolution, drowsy sloth, exorbitant and ravenous appetites and de- sires, impotent and self-vexing passions — can think human, nature, in him, is in its primitive integrity, and so pure as when it first issued from its high and most pure original. By such reflection, every man may perceive liis own ill b Plat. Sympo?. n THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. case, in these and many more such respects ; and by ob- serving the complaints of the most serious, and such as have seemed most to study themselves, collect it is gene- raUy so with others also. IV. They that have read the sacred volume, cannot be ignorant that <= all flesh have corrupted their way ; that the great God, looking d down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, that did seek God, hath only the unpleasing prospect before his eyes even of a universal depravation and defection ; that every one of them is gone back ; they are altogether be- come filthy, there is none that doeth good, no not one ; that all have sinned,^ and come short of the glory of God ; that this world lieth in wickedness ;f and that this was not the first state of man, but that he is degenerated into it from a former and better state; that? "God made him upright," but that he is become otherwise, by his own "many inventions :" that by trying conclusions to better a state already truly good, he brought himself into this woful plight ; and by aiming at somewhat above, sunk so far be- neath himself into that gulf of impurity and misery, that is now become to him as his own element ajjd natural state. Yea and the matter hath that evidence, that even many of them who, for ought we know, never conversed with those sacred records, have no less clearly discovered their sense of the present evil state of man, than their ignorance of the original of that evil,h though some of them carefully acquit God of it. We find their complaints of the malig- nity of ignorance j-^ surrounding all the earth, and that cor- rupts the soul shut up in the body ; that, as a garment and web, inwraps the minds of men, that they cannot look to him whose pleasure it is to be known, and who is not to be heard with ears, nor seen with eyes, nor expressed by words. That till it be rent in pieces, they have upon them the bond of corruption,'^ the dark coverture, the living death, the sensible carcass, a moving sepulchre, which they carry about with them. We find complaints, that by bonds and chains^ our mind is held, from our infancy : of certain " mean and debasing passions, that do fasten and even nail the soul to the body :" of much greater evils,'" and more grievous, than the most fainful bodily diseases, gouts, stranguries, dysenteries, and myriads of the like ; viz. all manner of sins, wickednesses, transgressions, ungodlinesses, which we have to lament as the maladies or disaffections of our soul. Of certain old or inveterate spots,'" that are by all means to be washed and purged out : that there are certain p7-in,- ciplcs of viciousness,° as pleasures, griefs, lusts, fears, en- kindled from the body, but mixed with the soul, and that absurdly bear rule over it. And the naturalness p of these is more than intimated, while they are said to be rather from parents and our first elements than ourselves : or, rather to be imputed, as is else- where ■! said, to those that plant, than those thai are planted,. Whence also, vice is said to be involmitary :' (being rooted in our natures :) that whosoever are vicious, become so from such things as do even prevent our choice. And c Gen. vi. d Psal. xiv. and liii. e Rom. iii. f 1 John v. g Eccl. ix. h Max. Tyr. Diss. 25. i Tlie so controverted Merc. Trisraei?. c. 7. Seeund. M. Ficin. Interpret, i; Trjff ay ft,^tTla5 KiiKia. k Tr}i (pdofiai f^erjjiov. 1 cipyfioiv xai avi'6c(TCoiv rov KaTCxoutvoVr ck ppcdxov, vow. Iamb, de vit Pythas. m -Tepi TO a-ajjjia TrXcvpiTi8ei,Ttpi7!'Ktvfioviai,.^pcviTiici,TTodaypat, srpay- yovpiai, Svaevnpiai, 4-C. irepi Scrrjv ipvxw toAAcoi pti^ovaKai x'iXs'i'WT-e- pa, adeafia, KOKa. -rt-upavoyiiai, aae0ri^iaTa. Idem. n — cyKarenKippGijicvat KijXiSts, p. 256, Hippar. Pythag. o ap\at xnKins. p £«■ Tbjv yciiCTop!,n Kai ro'VO", /laWov r] cl ajiuov. Piat. Tim. Locr. q aiTiarcnv ucf tov; (ivrevovras act, rcov avTCVouevuv uaWof. Idem. Tiniffiua. r KaKoi di aKovcnciirara yiyvope&a. Ibid. a ap^apivot ex TzaiSioi', koi ef apapravovciv okovts;. Idem. Hipp. Major, p. ;296. t uKovata vaOnpaTa. Plotin. Enne. 1. lib. &. u pcptyptvt] ) ap ovvon n^uv Koauov dtvatiCK T£ vov,Kac avctyKrj;. Idem. P- 77, w Ttiii dc rnf apernv ehovacov uvai cmrat to ttiv KOKtav OKOvotov vnap- X^ii'.&e. AJpinous, Cap. 30. X £f aiiToipvovs pox&npiai. Max. Tyr. Dissert. 25. y TO Trape-rropcvov ttj ovctat ripov Kmov. Hiero. in Carm. Pytha.^. z TOX'g eKTnopcvopevovs eii tov (itovirOTt^ci, fravTei ■nivovaiv, aXKa oi pcv -k\clov.ol & nrrov. Tab. Cebetis. a Empedoclcs and Heraclitiis represented as ToXXaicif oSvpoptvot xai \ot6opovm-£s Tr)ii (fivaiv c's ai'ajK»)i' Kai noXciiov ovaav, autyci St firicev /i1<)< uXtKtpiirci iX'^vatw. that all men do more evil than good,^ beginning even from their very childhood. And (as another expresses it') we offend from certain in^ voluntary passions, in which the pravityof the soul is made to consist : or that we here partake a certain mundane » Tia- ture, which, he says, is mixed of mind and necessity. And even from hence that virtue is.voluntary ; vice is, by another, concluded to be involuntary.'^ " For," says that author, " who can willingly, in the most lovely and most noble part of himself, choose that which is the greatest of all evils 1" esteeming vicious inclination the most repug- nant thing to liberty, (as it is indeed in the moral sense,) and the greatest slavery. Whereupon, another inquiring,' since God doth nothing but what is good, whence evils should come, resolves that whatsoever is good is from heaven, but all evil from our self-natural vilentss. And y another speaks of an evil adhering to our being, and not only acquired, but even connatural to us ; yea, and this evil is said to be the very death of the soul. The sadness of the common case of man in this respect, hath been therefore emblematically represented by a ^ potion of error and igno- rance, presented to every one at their first coming into the v;orld, and whereof it is said all do drink, more or less ; a woman called Imposture, accompanied by other harlots, Opinion, Lust, Pleasure, &c. seizing and leading away every one. ^ And hence are bitter complaints and accusa- tions poured forth even against nature itself, as being a mere force and war, and having nothing pure or sincere in it, but having its course amidst many unrighteous passions ; 3'ea, and its rise and first production are lamented, as founded in unrighteousness. The discontentful resentments where- of have made some not spare to censure our very make and frame, t the uniting of an immortal thing to a mortal in the composition of man, as a kind of distortion of na- ture, that the thing produced, should be made to delight in having parts so unnaturally pulled and drawn together. VI. So that some of the ethnick philosophers have been so far from denying a corruption and depravation of na- ture in man, that they have overstrained the matter, and thought vicious inclination more deeply natural than in- deed it is ; and so taxed and blamed nature, in the case of man, as to be too liable to implied reflections even on the blessed Author of nature himself": Whereto the known principles of the sect of the Stoics do too plainly tend, who give in so vast a catalogue of the diseases and distempers of the mind of man ; taking every thing into the account that hath the least of perturbation in it, with- out excepting so much as mercy itself, or pity towards them that suffer unjustly; and yet seem to subject all things to fate and natural necessity, whereby all these evils in the mind of man would be rejected upon the holy God, as their original cause. d Whence therefore some that were more sober have made it their business to vindi- cate God from so horrid an imputation ; and one of much note animadverts upon the mistakes of such as seemed so to charge him, sharply blaming them for such an inti- mation; but more sharply (quarrelling others in his own dubious twilight) for the excuse they give of it, viz. b Ttoi OvrjTOM avvepxopcvov adavoTOV. Plut. de .Solert. Anim. p. 964. c D Laert. L. 7. But perhaps tliey have been somewhat misunderstood by their prejudiced opposers, or some unwary expression of theirs been stretched beyond what was meant. For though they reckon f Afoj among tlie distempers of the mind ; yet so afterivards they do avtXtripoavvr] too Whence il is proba- ble they intended to place tXcn^ among the evils of man's nature no otherwise than as it should mclude undue perturSation in it, or as it might urge those who are more apt to be passionate upon such occasions, than just and wise, to the doing of unfit or unseasonable things for the atflicled person's relief; than which nothing is more supposable : which occasioned that famous general Agesilaus, when his sick friend importuned him witb tears, to stop the (then necessarj') march of his army tor his sake, (looking sadly back upon him,) to say. wj \a- XtTzov cs'iv cXecivKai fpovciv. How hard is it to be pitifid and wise • Phitar. Apophtheg; Lacon. And that aflerwanis making aveXerifxofTvvri vicious too, their meaning was, that a calm and sedate will or propension to relieve persons in distress was the virtue, both the otber the opposite >Tces. 'Which seems more likely than Menagius's way of salving the evavTiotpai'CS, by supposing avc^cripoovvti tiere to have been misprinted for cKeripotrn'r}, by some very as- suming transcribers, that were willing rather to express their own mind than their author's. Obser\'. in Locum. d And though in what follows they are sharply taxed, as laj-mg all the e\'il3 of the world (moral as well as other) upon God and nature, this seems to have proceeded from some lavish speeches of Chrj^ippus, that justly fell under the reprehension of Plutarch's severer and more sound judgment. Yet surely they did suppose another and purer state of na- ture, out of which man was lapsed ; otherwise, how come they, wben they assign the common notion of vicious perturbation or passion, to call it an irrational and {trapa (pvniv Kivrfoti] preternatural motion? What nature is that, which it is supposed to swerve from ? Re.sides that, they constantly call these diseases of the soul, therefore they understood them not to be its very nature : for then what were the diseased subject ? Nor Chap. IV. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 73 «That God dotli what they attribute to him in tliis matter, for the punishment of wicked men ; falleging it were a grievous matter that God should will and revenge the same thing, that wickedness should both be, and be pu- nished, according to the mind of God. ?Some do, with great reverence of the divine majesty, confess the rise of all this evil to be from man himself, viz. even that sort of evil which is called by the name of wickedness, is said to be from an innate principle, which the arbitrary power of a man's own soul hatcheth and fosters, and the fault is his who admits it ; but God is faultless : i> that God did place the soul over a terrene body, as a charioteer over a cha- riot, which it might governor neglect, &c. So another says, tkat 'whatsoever things come iiito this ICO rid from, God., are good ; but evils proceed from a certain ancient nature, tf-c. By which what could he mean, but the hereditary pravity which hath in a long series de- scended from depraved progenitors, so as no longer to be a new thing ; but of a forgotten original, and from of old reigning in the w^orld 1 They of this famous sect, the Platonists, seem often to attribute vicious inclination to the soul's being united with the body; (as supposing it to have existed pure and sin- less before ;) yet even thej"^ appear also not to have thought it impossible a human soul should sometime have been in an earthly body without sin. For their renowned leader discourses at large of a former incorrupt state of man in the body, (a golden age, as others also call it,) and of a defection or apostacy from it; which state, though his Eg}^lian tradition misinformed him about the continuance of it, he excellently describes, (as also man's declining from it,) telling us, that " then God familiarly conversed with men, taking care of them, as a shepherd of his flock ; !i that he w-as chiefly intent upon the ducture and govern- ment of their minds ; ithat (as he afterward says in another part of that unfinished discourse) while the godlike nature continued in sufficient vigour with them, they were obedient 10 laws, and behaved themselves friendly towards that '^divine thing that was akin to them. Then they possessed thoughts that were true, and altogether great ; using meek- ness and prudence in reference to their own conditions and one another ; that they disregarded all things in com- parison of virtue. They easily bore a prosperous condi- tion, esteeming all outward things little. They were not intoxicated or drunken with sensual delights; but sober and quick-sighted, and all things increased upon them through their mutual love and virtue. But they growing at length into a too great esteem and love of terrene things — n and that participation which they had of God decaying, (whereas all was well while the Divine nature remained with them,) and being variously intermingled with much deadly » evil, and a kind of human custom or course of living," as elsewhere he so expresses sinful corruption, "prevailing among them, and they not able to bear a pros- perous condition, came to shame, and ruin with it ; having lost the loveliest of their most precious things." Agreeably whereto, another, discoursing of the nature and original of evil, places it in our being plunged and sunk into mat- ter and corporeity : and commenting upon a noted Ppassage of his master, viz. " That our recovery must be by a speedy flight to God," &c. says, that this fight is not to de- part from the earth, 'ibut that ice become, even while we are on earth, righteous, a?id holy, and wise. Therefore also have we with this sort of men, so fre- quent discourses of the purgative virtues, "^ which suppose a lapse into great impurities; yet not so inseparable from oar natures, but that by divine help ^which thej- also sometimes speak of as necessary) a cure and redress may be wrought. VII. Nor, if we consider, can it be so much as imagin- able to us, that the present state of man is his primitive could it agree with that known dogma of tlieirs, that virtue is <5if5af rov tl, a ttiine to be taiietit, if tlicy should suppose ^^ce in tliat sense natural. And indeed, that Plutarch entitles that book he hath against them, Tupt ^oiKutv evavTjuijia, arsues. they intended not the gross things he refutes, for no man intends contradiction to himself. And since no man can hold both parts of a contradiction, it Li candid to snppose they would have chose rather, to let go the worserparf. e A>Aa ficv tov Occv KoXa^eiv dtrjat ttiv xaKiav Kai no\\a voteiv eiri ko. f'Ei^Ti ficv ovf TOVTO iiivov re Kai yii/tadat rnv xaxtav Kai Ko\a!^sadat Kara tov rov^wi \oyov. Plular. de Rcpugnan. Stoiconim. tafncnv rt\v avToipvr), if 'ifvxii c^ovata Kt/taKCi n Kai rt'Kcaipopei rji state, or that he is now such as he was at first made. For neither is it conceivable, the blessed God should have made a creature w-ith an aversion to the only imjKjrtant ends, whereof it is naturally capable; or, particularly, that he created man with a disaffection to himself; or that ever he at first designed a being of so high excellency as the spirit of man, to drudge so meanly, and be so basely servile to terrene inclinations ; or, that since there are manifestly powers in him of a superior and inferior sort and order, the meaner should have been, by original in.sti- tution, framed to command, and the more noble and ex- cellent, only to obey and serve; as now, every one that observes may see the common case with man is. Axid how far he is sw^erved from what he wa-s, is easily conjec- turable, bj' comparing him with the measures which show what he should be. For it cannot be conceived for what end laws were ever given him, if, at least, we allow them not the measures of his primitive capacity, or deny him ever to have been in a possibilit3'^ to obe}'. Could they be intended for his government, if conformity to them were against or above his nature 1 or were the)' only for his condemnation "? or for that, if he was never capable of obeying them 1 How inconsistent were it with the good- ness of the blessed God, that the condemnation of bis creatures should be the first design of his giving them laws ; and with his justice, to make his laws the rule of punishment, to whom they could never be the rule of obedience and duly; or with his wisdom, to frame a sys- tem and body of laws, that should never serve for either purpose, and so be upon the w-hole useful for nothing! The common reason of mankind teacheth us, to estimate the wisdom and equity of lawgivers, by the suitableness of their constitutions to the genius and temper of the people for w-hom they are made ; and we cojumonly reckon nothing can more slur and expose government, thaa the imposing of constitutions most probably impracticable, and which are never likely to obtain. How^ much more incongruous must it be esteemed to enjoin such as never possibly could ! Prudent legislators, and studious of the common good, would be shy to impose upon men under their power, against their genius and common usages, neither alterable easily, nor to an}' advantage. Much more absurd were it, with great soleninity and weighty sanc- tions to enact statutes for brute creatures ! And wherein were it more to purpose to prescribe unto men strict rules of piety and virtue, than to beasts or trees, if the former had not been capable of observing them as the latter were not 1 We insist not on the written precepts in the sacred volume, (where we have also the history of man's creation and fall,) but let the law be considered which is written in men^s hearts; the vSfios ^rj^novpyiKof, the ru^i? ewo^og, or the lex nata,^ (in the ethnick language.) tvhich the eternal, laiogiving mind hath created in mir souls. And how evi- dentl}' doth that law convince, that we neither are nor do what we should ! How gross and numerous deformities do we daily behold by that shattered and broken glass! how many things which we disapprove, or certainly would, if we discussed the matter with ourselves ! How "frequent buffetings are many, when the}' reilecT, constrained to suffer at their own hands ; even w'herein (not having an- other law) they are only " a law to themselves,'" Rom. ii. and have only their own thoughts, either their excusers, or accusers! And what doth that signify, but a lapse and recess from their original slate 1 the broken imperfect me- morials whereof, are a standing testimony against their present course; their notions of right and wrong, comely and uncomely, remonstrating against their vicious inclina- tions and ways. For would they ever reprove themselves for what was not possible to be otherwise'? Or was man created a mere piece of self-contradiction ; or with a nature made up of repugnancies, and perpetually at war with ovn/ia ftoxdnp'" avTOV tov cXofievov airiaf Qcos aiairiof. Ma.v. Tjr. ubi supra. h As he there proceeds. i oaa TTapa dcovayada. rait xaxa CKrrii apxa'as (bvoctic. Plot Enuead. 1. lib. 8. p. 77. kTheastet. \ ri tov Qzov (pvaii aVTOiit^ripKU. m T/) )? TO (Ti'y) fi'Cf Sttov. n v tov deov ttotpa. o TToAXwi roll OvrtTWt. p In Thestet. q ov TO CK yrj a-zcXBctv aWa, &c. Plot. Enne. 1. lib 1. r Marin Procl. s TiivTao voiioacTttivovi itaxieouodsTa rati \pv\ais. Hierocl. p. 19 and 210. 74 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. itself? This I should do, but that which is clean contrary I have a mind to. Were these ever like to be impressions, both signed upon him by the same hand 1 Nothing is plainer, therefore, than that he is corrupted from his pj'i- mitive integrity, and become a depraved and a degenerate thing. VIII. 2. We go on then, in the next place, to show, — That by this degeneracy, the temple of the living God among men became waste and desolate: viz. hoih unin- habitable or unfit for his blessed presence ; and, thereupon, deserted and forsaken of it. And (because in breaches and disagreements man hath tlie first hand and part) we shall therefore treat, First, Of the unaptne.ss of man, in his state of apostacy, to entertain the divine presence, or be any longer God's temple ; Second, Of the blessed God's absenting himself, and estrangement from him hereupon. 1. That the spirit of man, by his having apostatized, be- came unft to answer the purposes of a temple, will too plainly appear, by considering the nature of that apostacy ; which, what was it but a severing himself from God ; a recess and separation 1 Not in respect of place, (which was impossible,) but the temper of his mind and spirit ; or not by a local removal, but by unsuitableness and disaf- fection, departing in heart from the living God. 'Tis true indeed, that by this his revolt, he became indisposed to all other converse which belonged to him as a creature intel- ligent and virtuous, but chiefly to divine : the blessed God being the chief term of this defection and revolt. For man, by his original rectitude, was principally determined towards God: and by the same due bent and frame of spirit by which he stood rightly postured towards him, he was in a right disposition to everything besides wherewith he had any concern. And adhering to him as his centre and prime object, he kept his due order towards all other things : whence by forcing and relaxing the bonds that held him united to God, and by changing his posture towards him, he came to stand right no way. Turning to him tlie back, and not the face, all things are inverted to him. He is now become most directly opposite to God, and unduly disposed towards other things only by means of that opposition. As then he is unfit for every other good use, so most of all for that of a temple ; and that upon both the above-mentioned accounts, as being first unsuitable to the blessed God, and then thereupon disaf- fected. Ist. Man was become most unsuitable to him ; the di- vine image (which where should it be but in his temple) being now defaced and torn down. We speak not now of the natural image of God in man, or the representation the soul of man hath of its Maker in the spiritual, intelli- gent, vital, and immortal nature thereof, which image we know cannot be lost ; but its resemblance of him in the excellences which appear to be lost, and which were his duty, a dehitum i?iesse, and could not be lost but by his own great default. And those are both such as wherein the soul of man did imitate and resemble God, as know- ledge, purity, justice, benignity, &c. and such as wherein though it could not imitate him, yet was to bear itself correspondently towards him ; as he being the absolute Sovereign, to be subject to him, obey and serve him : and he being the all-sufficient Good, to trust in him, depend upon him, know, love, and delight in him, unite with him, and expect blessedness only in and from him. How unlike and disagreeable to God in all these respects is apostate man ! That whereas the notion given us of God, is, that he is Light, and with him is no darkness at all ; (1 John i.) it is said of such as have been involved in the common apostacy, in reference to that their former state, " Ye were darkness ;" as if that were the fittest and truest account that could be given of this revolted creature : not that he is in darkness, or there is much darkness in him, but, " He is darkness," Ephes. v. He and darkness may define one another — That is he ; and he is that. A dismal horrid cloud hath inwrapped his soul, that resists and yields not easily to the most piercing beams, excludes light, wheresoever it would insinuate itself This hath made the soul of man a most unmeet receptacle for the divine presence, and more like a dungeon than a temple. And as he is now sunk into carnality, and a low, abject, earthly spirit, how unfit is he for divine converse ! How unapt to savour the things of God ! How unlike the Father of Spirits ! And whereas he was of a middle na- ture, partaking somewhat of the angelical, somewhat of the animal life, how is he swallowed up of the latter, and become like the beasts that peri.sh ; as the horse and mule without understanding, as the dog and swine both for fierceness and impurity ; as the one is both apt to bite and devour, and return to his own vomit, and the other both to rend such as stand in his way, and wallow in the mire. We might add the sundry other Scripture resemblances of wolves, bears, lions, serpents, adders, vipers, &c. where- by many brutes seem to meet in one man ; and to have made a collection, and contributed their worst qualities, and all the venom of their natures, to the making up of one mischievous composition in him. So that instead of a temple, he is a cage of every unclean and hurtful thing : he is, in short, of a reprobate mind, full of all unrighteous- ness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, &c. How repug- nant, in all respects, to the holy, pure, benign, merciful nature of God ! How remote from the imitation of his Maker, wherein he hath offered himself as his most imitable pattern ! And wherein he is not imitable, but requires a proportionable and correspondent deportment or conformity ; as by trust to his all-sufiiciency, by subjec- tion to his sovereign power and government. How dismal is the case, and how horrid the effects, of the apostacy in these regards ! How preposterous and perverse are his dispositions and the course he hath run ! For wherein it was permitted to him to imitate and affect likeness to a Deity ; where he was put under no restraints, and his highest aspirings had been not only innocent, but most worthy of praise, (as to imitate God in wisdom, righteou.s- ness, sincerity, goodness, purity, &c.) here nothing would please but utmost dissimilitude, and to be as unlike God as he could devise. But in those things that were within the enclosure, and appropriate most peculiarly to the God- head ; to be the "first and the last, the Alpha and Omega ; the only one on whom ail must depend, and to whom all must bersubject and obey : these sacred regalia, the highest rights and flowers of the eternal crown, these are thought fine things, and beheld with a libidinous devouring eye, caught at by a profane sacrilegious hand. Nothing would satisfy but to be Godlike in this most disallowed and im- possible sense. Man, when he hath reduced himself to the lowest pitch of vileness, misery, and penury, now will be self-sufficient ; and when he is become the most abject slave to ignominious lusts and passions, now he will be supreme : that is, having made himself viler than the meanest creature, and worse than nothing, he vnW be a god, even his own, a god to himself Having severed and cut himself off from God, he will supply the room, and live only within himself: be to himself what God was, and should ever be. He now moves wholly in his own sphere, disjoined from that of the whole world, and is his own centre. All he does is from himself, and for himself. Thus is the true image of God torn down from his own temple, and that alienated, and become the temple of a false god, dedicate to that abominable idol, self. IX. 2nd. Whence it comes to pass, that man is most dis- affected to God, and full of enmity. So Scripture testifies concerning the carnal mind, Rom. viii. 8. And whom it had before represented (ch. ii.) full of all malignity, it afterwards .speaks of as directing it (most horrid to think) against this blessed object; "Haters of God, despiteful," &c. Nor is any thing more natural ; for, in part, the con- trariety of their nature to his, more immediately begets this enmity, which always rises out of dissimilitude ; and partly it is fomented and increased to a great degree, by a secret consciousness of that dissimilitude, and the misgivings ot their own guilty fears thereupon ; which must tell them, whensoever they have so much communication with them- selves, that they are unlike, and cannot but be impleasing to him; and this infers some kind of dread; whence (as hath been commonly observed) the passage is short and easy unto hatred. And though the more positive workings of this enmity do not (perhaps with the most) so ordinarily discover themselves ; and they do not see or suspect that they hate him, while they are not urged to self-reflection ; and when they are hardly admit a conviction that they do: Chap. IV. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 75 yet the matter carries its ovra evidence with it, and would soon be put beyond a question, if men were Avilling to understand the truth of their own case. For whence else do they so slowly entertain the knowled°:e of God, when the whole earth is full of his glory"? When so manifest Srints and footsteps of his wisdom, power, and goodness, o offer themselves to view in every creature, whence can it be, but that they like not to retain him in their know- ledge ■? Rom. i. And that their very hearts say to him, Depart from us, we desire not the knowledge of thy ways ? Job xxi. Why is so bright a light not observed, but that it shines amidst a malignant darkness, that, resisting, com- prehends it not 1 Why are the thoughts of God so un- pleasant to men, and unfrequent, that when one would suppose no thoughts should be so obvious, none so wel- come, yet it is become the character of an unrenewed man to forget God, (Psal. ix.) or not to have him in ail his thoughts 1 Psal. x. Why do men decline his acquaint- ance, live volimtary strangers to him all their days, and as without him in the world 1 Ephes. ii. Why are men so averse to trust him, and turn to him, even upon so mighty assurances 1 What makes them shy to take his word, but rather count him a liar, though they know it incon- sistent with his nature ; and can form no notion of God, without including this conception therein, that he cannot lie; when as yet they can ordinarily trust one another, though there be so much colour to say, " All men are liars '?" Why do they resist his authority, against which they carmot dispute, and disobey his commands, unto which they cannot devise to frame an exception 1 What, but the spirit of enmity, can make them regret so easy a yoke, reject so light a burthen, shun and tly off froni so peaceful and pleasant paths; yea, and take ways that so manifestly take hold of hell, and lead down to the cham- bers of death, rather choosing to perish than obey 1 Is not this the very height of enmity 1 What further proof would we seek of a disaffected and implacable heart 1 Yet to all this, we may cast in that fearful addition, their saying in their heart. No God ; (Ps. xiv.) q. d. O that there were none ! This is enmity, not only to the highest pitch of wickedness, (to wish their common Parent extinct, the Author of their being,') but even unto madness itself For in the forgetful heat of this transport, it is not thought on that they wish the most absolute impossibility, and that, if it were possible, they wish, with his, the extinction of their owti, and of all being; and that the sense of their hearts, put into words, would amount to no less than a dire- ful and most horrid execration and curse upon God, and the whole creation of God at once ! as if by the blasphemy of their poisonous breath, they would ■gather all nature, blast the whole universe of being, and make it fade, lan- guish, and drop into nothing. This is to set their mouth against heaven and earth, themselves, and all things at once, as if they thought their feeble breath should over- power the omnipotent word, shake and shiver the adaman- tine pillars of heaven and earth, and the almighty Jiat be defeated by their nay ; striking at the root of all ! So fitly is it said. The fool hath in his heart muttered thus ! Nor are there few such fools : but this is plainly given us as the common character of apostate man, the whole re- volted race ; of whom it is said in very general terms, " They are all gone back, there is none that doeth good." This is their sense, one and all ; i. e. comparatively ; and the true state of the case being laid before them, it is more their temper and sense to say no God, than to repent, and turn to him. What mad enmity is this ! Nor can we de- vise into what else to resolve it. This enmity, indeed, more plainly shows itself where the Divine glory (especially that of his grace, and good- will towards men, a thing not less evident, than strange) more brightly shines : yet there are so manifest appear- ances of it every where, and he hath so little left himself " without witness" unto any, that the universal strange- ness of men towards him apparently owes itself more to enmity than ignorance ; and even where there is much darkness, there is more ill-will. For their ignorance by which they are alienated from fhe life of God, is called blindness of heart; i. e. voluntary, affected blindness, Er>h. iv. 18. It can be imputed to nothing else, that they who ha\'e Grod so near to every one of them, who live and move, and have their being in him, do not }'et seek after him, and labour to feel and find him out; i. e. that they can miss of God so nigh at hand, when they have even, palpable demonstrations of his nearness, and kind propen- sions towards ihem. Now this being the ca.se, whatever this degenerate vile creature might serve for else, he was plainly most unfit for the use of a temple, or to be the dwelling-place of God. 2. Nor can it now be a wonder that the divine presence should be hereupon withdrawn ; that the blessed God ab- sents himself, and Ls become a stranger to this his once beloved mansion. We shall here lake notice how appa- rent it is — 1. That he hath done so, — 2. That he was most highly justifiable herein. And, first. That he hath withdraxni himself, and left tliis his temple desolate, we have many sad and plain proofs before us. The stately ruins are visible to every eye, that bear in their front (yet extant) this doleful inscrip- tion — fiere 606 once iiwlt. Enough appears of the admi- rable frame and structure of the soul of man, to show the divine presence did sometimes reside in it ; more than enough of vicious deformity, to proclaim he is now retired and gone. The lamps are extinct, the altar overturned; the light and love are now vanished, which did the one shine with so heavenly brightness, the other burn with so pious fervour; the golden candlestick is displaced, and thrown away as a useless thing, to make room for the throne of the prince of darkness ; the sacred incense, which sent rolling up in clouds its rich perfumes, is exchanged for a poisonous, hellish vapour, and here is, " instead of a sweet savour, a stench." The comely order of this house is turned all into confusion; "the beauties of holiness" into noisome impurities ; the " house of prayer to a den of thieves," and that the worst and most horrid kind ; for every lust is a thief, and every theft sacrilege: continual rapine and robbery is committed upon holy "things. The noble powers which were designed and dedicated to divine contemplation and delight, are alienated to tlie service of the most despicable idols, and employed unto vilest intu- itions and embraces ; to behold and admire lying vanities, to indulge and cherish lust and wickedness." What have not the enemies done wickedly in the sanctuary 1 How have they broken do^^'n the carved work thereof, and that too with axes and hammers, the noise whereof was not to be heard in building, much less in the demolishing this sacred frame ! Looli upon the fragments of that curious sculpture which once adorned the palace of that great king; the relics of common notions ; the lively prints of some undefaced truth; the fair ideas of things; the yet legible precepts that relate to practice. Behold ! with what accuracy the broken pieces show these to have been engraven by the finger of God, and how they now lie torn and scattered, one in this dark corner, another in that, buried in heaps of dirt and rubbish ! There is not now a system, an entire table of coherent truths to be found, or a frame of holiness, but some shivered parcels. And if any, with great toil and labour, apply themselves to draw out here one piece, and there another, and set them to "'"sen t" ut uie p atfo".n. the foundation, and the lounder of .t. Th;- ;-"^';";; , ^f ">'' «;,^^f, "^ was, in order hereto, also a sacrifice ; 1».1'"'<^"J'^ '''^\' V^V' 'h', aS t^^^^ and without wrong to his f.'oVLrninfe' justice, retun,, aii.l h.iu; '"^ abwle «i h men. And that they misht Ik-,-,,,,,,- |,r,|i,-in-rl i., "'''^'JV,; , :n,l h/iv Snir^ eencc. For which purpos,. ,.■ Imi , ,„ ''7' 'I';:!"'"''.''' y'^ '' ^l ''V,,^ '' '^ "': on the account of this sa.-utuv. 1 hat u i.n l..„d ,s. Inrih.- >ak,. o it i ig wemieht no longer remain unwilling, lliat iunvillin!;iie=s to lie inn o ne tiy 0.e Tower and spirit of Kmmaimel : as liereulUr to.be more lully shown. But working (suitably to an inielligent subject) m a rational way. lo wliicti a great acconnnodateness, in the consUtution ot Emmanuef As demon- siruting divine love, and holuiess. In its loveliness. Possibdity of being attained. And indeed, what was to be designed and done, did every way call for so great an undertaker.— The indignity offered to the majesty of the most high God, in his so igno- minious expulsion from his own temple, was to be recom- pensed; — and the ruin must be repaired which had be- fallen his temple itself I. In reference to both these performances, it was deter- mined Emmanuel, i. e. his own Son, his substantial Ima^e, the Biightness of his glory, the eternal Word, should be- come incarnate ; and being so, should undertake several parts, and in di-stinct capacities, and be at once a single Temple himself, and that this temple should be also a sacrifice, and thereby give rise to a manifold temple con- formed to that original one, of each whereof, in the virtue of that s icrifice, he was himself to be the glorious Pattern, the firm Foundation, the magnificent Founder, and the most curious Architect and Former, by his own various and most peculiar influence. This hath been the result of the divine counsel, and the Lord's own doing, most justly marvellous in our eyes, VIZ. (which we are next to consider.) II. That the blessed God hath laid the platform and the foundations of his temple, as it was to be restored and set up again among men, in and by that great Emmanuel, his own Son made flesh. It is to be considered that (as hath been shown) the world had a long time lain deluged with wickedness, sunk in sensuality, and a deep oblivion of God ; his memorial was even lost among men, and no- thing less thought of than a temple in the true design and meaning of it ; the notices of God, and any inclination to religion that remained, (too deeply infixed into the mind and nature of men to be quite extinct,) were yet so faint and weak, carnal and terrene propensions so strong, that the vital religion which was the proper business of a living temple, could have noplace. It was not only so in the pagan worlds, from which God had further withdrawn himself, but even with that select people to whom he vouchsafed more peculiar manifestations and symbols of his mind and presence. They had a figurative temple by his own appointment, erected in much glory among them, that might have in- structed them, and by degrees the rest of the world, if they would have understood its true meaning and signification, that God was yet willing to dwell with men on earth, and that it should be a " house of prayer for all nations," who ought, upon those glorious appearances of God among that people, to have gradually proselyted themselves unto them. It prefigured what he intended, viz. in his ap- pointed season, by his own Son to descend and inhabit, make and constitute him a much more glorious temple than could be built of wood or stone, or by the hands of men : that in after-time " Shiloh should come, unto whom the gathering of the people should be," and by whom he would reconcile and re-collect the apostate world back again to himself But all this was an unintelligible mys- tery on all hands ; entered not into the minds of men of either sort, but much less into their hearts ; and the Jews did much more afl"ect to paganize, and go further oif from God, than the pagans (which in this they ought) to judaize, and draw nearer to him. The natural sentiments of reli- gion, which were common to all men, did run out only into mere external observances and empty (though some- what different) formalities, that might we'll enough agree with a sensual life, transacted in habitual estrangement from God, and as without him in the world ; so as not only not to answer the true intent and use of a temple, but to frustrate and elude it. III. When this was the state of things with this world, and the fulness of time was now come, wherein God in- tended, with more vigour and efficacy, to renew and rein- force his mighty and merciful work of setting up his temple, and to make it rise in splendour and glory in the world, he at length sends down his Son : he puts on man ; be- comes Emmanuel ; an incarnate God among men ; and a Man inhabited by all the fulness of God. This Man w-as, therefore, a most perfect Temple ; the origiiwl one : i. e. not only a single one himself, but an exemplary Temple, to which all other were to be conformed ; the advantage whereof to the forming of more we shall see hereafter : whereby he was also a virtual one, from which life and inlluence was to be transfused to raise and form all others. But in order to its being so, this very temple must become a sacrifice ; and by dying, multiply : a seminal temple, as w^e shall hereafter show, and as he himself represents the matter. John xii. 24. And which is in the full sense of it .said, 1 Pet. ii. where, when we were first told, {v. 4, 5.) we must come to him as unto a living stone, and as lively stones be built up a spiritual house; we are further told, {v. 24.) that he himself bare our sins is his own body on the tree, (where he was offered as a sacrifice,) that we might die to sin, and live to righteousness. For now, a temple being, in its proper u.-;e and design, intended for divine honour, could not have its foundation in the ruin thereof, or be built upon his unremedied dishonour: the Son of God, by tendering himself for a valuable recom- pense, must be the Corner-stone of this new building. The wrong that man had done to the divine majesty should be expiated by none but man, and could be by none but God. Behold then the w^onderful conjunction of both in the one Emmanuel ! who was, by his very constitution, an actual Temple; "God with us;" the habitation of the Deity returned, and resettling itself with men ; and fitted to be (what it must be also) a most acceptable sacrifice. For here were met together man that could die, and God that could overcome death ; man, that might suffer, and God, that could give sufficient value to those sufferings; sufficient to atone the offended Majesty, and procure that life might be diffused, and spread itself to all that should unite with him ; whereby they might become living stones, joined to that living Corner-stone; a spiritual temple, again capable of that divine presence which they had for- feited, and whereof they were forsaken. That all this may be the better understood, we shall endeavour to show, more distinctly, 1. The sufficiency and aptness of the constitution and appointment of Emmanuel, (considering what he was, and what was underiaken to be suffered and performed by him,) as the most proper and adequate means for the restoring of God's temple with men. 2. The necessity of this course for this end. L And for the former, the aptness and sufficiency of this course, or what the setting up of Emmanuel might do for this purpose, may be seen in the suitableness hereof to the foregoing state of the case, and by comparing therewith what he is, and hath done and suffered in order hereto We have seen that the former desolate slate of this tcmplfi was occasioned and inferred by man's aposiacy, (whereby he became incapable of serving any longer the purposes of a temple, and God's departure thereupon. There was therefore the concurrence of somewhat on man's part, and somewhat on God's, unto this desolation; on man's, what was unjust, leading, and casual ; on God's what was most just, consequent, and caused thereb}'; man's unrighteous and ill-deserving aversion from God . and God's most righte- ous and deserved aversion hereupon from him : the one caused by the other, but both causing in different kinds the vacancy and deserted state of this temple which en- sued ; the former as a sinning cause, the latter as a pun- ishing. Now what we have considerable in the Emma- nuel towards the restoration of this temple, and that it might become again habitable and replenished by the Divine presence as before, is answerable to this state of the case ; and directly tending to compose thinirs between the distanced parties, both on the one part and the other. And because God was to have the first and leading part in reconciliations, as man hath in disagreements, we have 78 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. enough in him, whereupon — God might express himself willing to rebuild and return to his former dwelling; — and man be willing to render it back to him, and admit the operation of the fashioning hand whereby it is to be prepared and refitted for its proper use. IV. L The former is eflected ; and a foundation is laid for the effecting of the other too, in his becoming a sacri- ^ce to justice; a sacrifice so rich and fragrant, so full of value and grateful savour, as that abundant recompense is made by it for the wrong man had done to the Majesty of heaven, by profaning and polluting this temjile, and expelling so contumeliously its great Inhabitant : — an in- jury, to which the creation, consuming in a universal flame, had been an unproportionable sacrifice : but the sacrifice ot himself, the Emmanuel, God-man, could be defective in nothing ; was both suitable and equal to the exigency of the case. For the sacrifice of him who was man, was suitable to the offence of man ; and of him who was God, was equal to the wrong done to God. Long before this sacrifice was offered, the expectation of it, and since, the remembrance have been precious. It Avas of sufficient virtue to work and diffuse its influence at the greatest dis- tance ; and not of time onl}', but of place too ; to perfume the world, and scatter blessings through all the parts and nations of it, as well as through all the ages. When no other sacrifice or offerings could avail any thing, (Psal. xl. Heb. X.) lo ! He comes into a body prepared on purpose: which, though it was not formed and assumed until the fulness of time, (Gal. iv. 4,) was yet reckoned as slain from the beginning of it. Rev. xiii. 8. This was the seed in which, though it sprung up only in Judca, yet all the na- tions of the earth were to be blessed. Gen. xxii. 18. Long was this body in preparing, and the seed transmitted through many generations, whence it was at length to arise; into which, as its last preparation, the Deity descended ; and that it might be a suflicientlj^ costly sacrifice, filled it with the divine fulness ; for in him dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. Col. ii. 9. When we read Abel's sacri- fice to have been more excellent than Cain's (Heb. xi. 4.) the Greek word is, it was fnlli;r. How full a one was this ! That was filled by faith with a derivative fulness; this, immediately by God himself, with his own self-fulness, which filleth all in all, and whence all must receive. Being so filled, it was a temple, and must now further be a sacrifice. Both are signified in that one short passage, which himself let fall, (John ii. 19.) " Destroy this tem- ple :" i. e. that he M^as a Temple, and was to be destroyed ; which is carried m the notion of a sacrifice. This he said of his body, v. 21. Strange mystery ! The very temple itself a consuming oblation, self-devoted even to destruc- tion, and out of that again self-raised! The Divine justice could not hereby but be well satisfied, and say. It was enough, when the whole temple became all propitiatory, and the profanation of the former temple was expiated by the immolation of the new : so that, in point of honour and justice, no exception could now lie against the re- turn of the Divine presence to its wasted and forsaken temple. V. Only his return could not, as yet, be presently to dwell there, (for it was most unfit,) but to refit and prepare it for his future dwelling. It had been long desolate, and hereby was become decayed and ruinous, full of noisome impurities ; yea, the habitation of dragons, and devils of Ziim, and Jiim, and Ochim. Many an abominable idol was set up here, that filled up the room of the one God that had forsaken and left it. It was wholly in the pos- session of false gods, for whose use it was the more fit, by how much it wa.s the less fit for his ; for amidst darkness, confusion, and filthiness, was the chosen seat of the prin- cipalities and powers that now did dwell and rule here. Here was the throne of the prince of darkness, the resort of his associates, the altars of as many lusts as the heart of man, now wholly given up to all manner of wicked- ness, could multiply unto itself; by whose consent and choice, this horrid alienation had been made and con- tinued. Upon such terms the "strong man armed kept the house." The blessed God might now return, but he must build before he dwell, and conquer ere he build. He might return, but not upon other terms than the expiatory value, and actual or ascertained oblation of that above-mentioned sacrifice : for when he forsook this his temple, he left it with just resentment, and his most righteous curse upon it — a curse that was of this import, " Never anything holy or pure any more come here, or any thing good and plea- sant. The light of the sun never shine any more at all on thee : the voice of joy and gladness never be heard any more at all in thee." The powerful horror of this curse held it doomed to all the desolation and misery that were upon it ; confirmed it in the power of him that ruled here, at his will. Hence, had the magic and charms of the evil one, their permitted, unresisted efficacy, rendered it an enchanted place; related and adjoined it to the nether world, the infernal region ; made it the next neighbour- hood, even of the very suburbs of hell ; barred out all divine light and grace, all heavenly beams and influences from it. So that, had it not been for this Sacrifice, this temple had been and remained, even in the same kind, an accursed place, as hell itself: the Spirit of God should have had no more to do here, than there; for so the sen- tence and curse of his violated law had determined : " Thou shalt die the death," did say no less. VI. But now, (Gal. iii.) Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us : for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree : that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. He was made a curse for us ; not the same in kind which we had incurred, (which it were horrid to think,) but such as his slate could admit, and ours could lequire. For that a person so immutably pure and holy should become an impure thing, was what his state could not admit ; and that one of so high dignity should willingly suffer to that degree which he did for us, was a thing of so great merit and value, as to answer the uttermost of our ill-deservings ; than which the exigency of our case could not, in that respect, call for more. And the end or design of his be- coming to that degree a curse for us, being expressly said to be this, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit, (or the promised Spirit,) implies that the curse upon us had intercepted and cut off from us all influence of that holy blessed Spirit; for the fresh emission whereof, in God's own stated method, he had now again opened the way. That this blessing is hereby said to become the por- tion of the Gentiles, was enough to the apostle's present purpose, writing to the Galatians ; the Jews having, upon the same terms, had the same privilege formerly from age to age : " Thou gavest thy good Spirit to instruct them ;" (Neh. ix. 20.) which also is implied in their being charged with vexing and rejecting this blessed Spirit, one genera- tion after another, Isa. Ixiii. 10. Acts vii. 51. And they had now the same gospel, and are here also included, in that it is said to be the blessing of Abraham ; into the communion whereof the Gentiles are now declared to have been admitted, about which so great a doubt had been in those days. That therefore the Spirit might be given for the mentioned purpose, on the account of the Son of God's oblation of himself, is out of question. The necessity that he should be only given on these terms, will be seen here- after, in its proper place, in ch. ix. But whereas it hath been designed in all this discourse to represent the constitution of Immanuel (being first made a personal Temple, then a Sacrifice) as an apt and fit means to multiply this one temple into many, and bring it about, that upon just and honourable terms God might again return to inhabit the souls of men : it may perhaps be alleged, by some, — That it seems an unrighteous thing God should appoint his own innocent Son to be punished for the sins of offending creatures, and let them escape. And then how could an unjust act make for the honour of his justice, or that which was in itself unfit, be a fit means to any good end 1 — The loud clamours wherewith some later contenders have filled the Christian world upon this subject, make it fit to say somewhat of it; and the thing itself needs not that we say much. We do know that the innocent Son of God was crucified ; we know it was by God's determinate counsel ; we know it was for the sins of men ; (which the adversaries, in a laxer and less signifi- cant sense, deny not, though it must by no means be understood, say they, as a punishment of those sins;) we Chap. V. THE LIVING TEMPLE. T9 know many of those sinners do finally escape deserved punishment.. The truth of these things, in fact, is disputed on neither side : all these then are acknowledged recon- cilable and consistent with the justice of God. What then is to be inferred^ Not that these things are not so, ; for that they are, is acknowledged on all hands. What then ? That God is unjust 1 Will their zeal for the repu- tation of God's justice admit of this 1 No ; but it is only unjust to count this suftering of his Son a punishment : that is, 'tis unjust he should sutler for a valuable and necessary purpose ; not that he should sufier needlessly, or for no purpose that might not have been served without it! But why may not the sufferings of Christ be looked on as a punishment! Because they will have it be essen- tial to pimishment, that it be inflicted on the person that offended ; and then inconsistent with its notion and essence, that it be inflicted on an innocent person. But if so, the Eretence for the cry of injustice vanishes, vmless they will e so absurd as to say. It is very just to afflict an inno- cent person, but not to punish him; when the punishment hath no more in it of real evil to him that suffers it, than the admitted affliction. And when they say, The very no- tion of punishment carries in it an essential respect to that personal guilt of him that bears it, it implies that in the present case punishment hath no place, not because it is unjust, but because it is impossible. In the meantime, how vain and ludicrous is that pretence, that all the real evil which God determined should befall his Son he .should let come upon him with ackuQwledged justice, but that the injustice must lie only in a notion ; i. e. if he look upon it as a pimishment. Yet also the pimishing of one for another's offence is forbidden to men, as themselves allege from Deut. xxiv. 16. (as it is not strange God should disallow men that dominion over one another, which he mny claim to himself, and which he is in no such possibi- lity to abuse as they,) which therefore shows their notion of punishment is false, by which they would make it im- possible for one man to be puni-shed for another's faults, (as the ''learned Grotius acutely argues,) inasmuch as it were absurd to forbid a thing that is impossible. And that God himself doth often pimish the sins of some upon others is evident enough from many places of holy Scrip- ture ; particularly the second commandment, (Exod. xx. 5.) " I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, vi.siting the sins of the fathers upon the children," &c. 2 Sara. xxiv. 15, &c. 1 Kings xiv. Lam. v. 7. Whereas therefore they are wont, on the contrary, to allege that of Ezek. xviii. " Ye shall no more use this proverb, The fathers have eaten the sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge," V. 2, 3. and 19, 20, &c. It is plain, in that it is said. Ye shall no more, &c. that the blessed God speaks here of what, in merciful indulgence, he for the future would not do, not of what in strict justice he might not ; for can it be supposed he owns himself to have dealt un- justly with them before. It is evidently therefore neither impossible nor unjust to punish one for another's offence ; and the matter only .seems harsh, to such as have misshapen to themselves the notion of punishment, and make it only correspond to the appetite of private revenge : whereas it only answers to a just will of vindicating the rights and honour of govern- ment ; which may most fitly be done, upon another than the offender, not at random, or in an undistinguishing pro- miscuous hurry, but upon the two suppositions mentioned by the above-recited author. 1. If there be a near con- junction between the person punished, and the person offending. 2. If there be a consent and voluntary sus- ception of the former on behalf of the other. And we add, a.s a 3. Especially if there be thereupon a legal substitu- tion, the supreme ruler upon that consent also agreeing, providing, by a special law made in the case, for such transferring of the guilt and punishment. All which have so eminently concurred in the present case, that it can proceed from nothing but a disposition to cavil, further to msist and contend about it. And we know that such translations have among men not only been esteemed just, but laudable ; as in the known story of Zaleucus, who having ordained that adultery among" his Locricas should a De Satisfact, be punished with the loss of lx)th eyes, and his own son afterwards being found guilty of that crime, was content to lose one of his own eyes, that justice might be done to the public constitution, and mercy be .shown to his son in saving one of his : and that of the Pythagoreans, Damon and Pythias, the one of whom pawned his own life to the tyrant, to procure time for ?he other (condemned to die) wherein to settle some affairs abroad before his death; who returning within the limited time to .save his faith and his friend's life, by surrendering his own, so moved tlie tyrant that he spared both. The common case of man, forsaken of the divine presence, and not to be restored without recompense, was the most deplorable and the most important that could be tliought. And it may now be compassionately cared for; this having been obtained by this great sacrifice, that the divine justice is so well satis- fied, and his majesty and honour .so fully asserted and vin- dicated, as that he now mav, without wrong to himself, (his justice and the dignity of his goveinment not reclaim- ing against it,) cast a compassionate and favourable eye upon the desolations of his temple; take up kind thoughts towards it ; send forth his mightier Spirit to di.spossess the " strong man armed," to vanquish the combined ene- my-powers, to build and cleanse and beautify the habita- tion of his holiness, and then inhabit and dwell in it: upon which account it is now called, the temple of the Holy Ghost ; the Spirit which the Father .sends, in the name of the Son, upon this errand; he having obtained that it should be sent. By which Spirit also ihe Emma- nuel was .sufficientlj' enabled to gain our consent unto all this ; for his dying on the cro.ss was not that he mijfht have the Spirit in himself, but that he might have the power of communicating it: and so (as was before inti- mated) might the foundation he laid fen- what i; to be done on our part, by the offering of this sacrifice : of which we are next further to treat. VII. Wherefore, '2(Ui/, That which was to be done on <«ir part, in order to the restoring of God's temple in us, was, that we be made vUUng of his return, and that there be wrought in us whatsoever might tend to make us fitly ca- pable of so great a presence. More needs not to be said (but much more easily might) to show thnt we were most unwilling. And that our becoming willing was requisite, is sufficiently evident. For what sort of a temple are we to be? Not of wood and stone; but a.s our worship must be all reasonable service, of the same constitution mu.st the temple be whence it is to proceed. We are to be tem- ples, by self-dedication, separating ourselves unto that purpose; and are to be the voluutar}' under-labourers in the work that is to be done for the preparing of this temple for its proper use: and the use which is to be made of it, that there the blessed God and we might amicably and with delight converse together, supposes our continual willingness, which therefore must be once obtained. Now unto this purpose also, the constitution of Emmanuel was most .suitable; or the setting up of this one eminent tem- ple first, God ill Christ. This was a leading case, and had a further design : it was never meant that the Divine presence should be confined to that one single Person, or only that God should have a temple on earth as long as the Man Christ should reside there ; but he was to be the priviary original Tempk ; and his being so, did contribute to the making us willing to become his temples al.-^o. iKl. As here was the fulness of that Spirit, by whose power and influence that, and all the subsequent work, was to be wrought in us: which fulness is bv that blessed name EMMANUEL, signified to be in him on purpose to be communicated, or as what must be some way com- mon unto God with us. Our aversion was not easily vincible: the people, it was said, (speaking of the reisrnof Emmanuel,) should be willing in the day of his power; (Ps. ex. 3.) and as it follows, in the beauties of holiness, 1 Chr. xvi. 29. This was a known name of God's tem- ple, for the building whereof David wa-s now preparing, and whereto the passages agree, Ps. xxvii. 4. Ps. xc\n. 8, 9. And that spiritual one whereof we speak must be here chiefly meant, whereof the Christian world, in its exterior frame, is but the outer court ; or is subordinate to the interior 80 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. frame, and to the work thereof, hut as scafTolds to the build- ing which they enclose. The people shall be loilling, but not otherwise than being made so by his 'power ; and that not always put forth, but in the day of his power; on a noted memorable day; a day intended for the demonstra- tion and magnifying of his power ; i. e. the season when Emmanuel (the Lord, to whom the speech was addressed) would apply and set himself, even with his might, to the great work of restoring and raising up the temple of God : a work not to be done by might and power, (according to the common, vulgar notion thereof, by which nothing is reckoned might and power but a visible arm of flesh, hosts and armies, horses and chariots,) but by my Spirit, saith the Lord of hosts, Zech. iv. Then, though the spirits of men swell as mountains, in proud enmity and opposition, (which must be levelled where this building is designed,) those mountains shall appear bubbles : what are they be- fore this great undertaker 1 They shall become a plain, when the Head-stone is brought forth with shoutings, unto which the cry shall be, Grace, grace. tThis is the Stone laid in Zion for a foundation, sure and tried, elect and <= precious; disallowed by men, but chosen of God; the d chief Stone of the corner ; a living, spirituous Stone, from which is a mighty effluence of life and spirit, all to attract and animate other stones, and draw them into union with itself, so as to compact and raise up this admirable fabric, a spiritual house for " spiritual sacriiice, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ:" a Stone that shall spread life through the whole frame ; called therefore a ^Branch, as well as a Stone, whereto is attributed the work and the glory of building God's temple. " Behold the Man whose name is the Branch ; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord ; even he shall build the temple of the Lord ; and he shall bear the glory," &c. chap. vi. A plain indication, that the prophecies of that book did not ultimately terminate in the restoration of the temple at Jerusalem; but, more mystically, intended (he great comprehensive temple of the living God, which the Messiah should extend and ditfuse, by a mighty communication of his Spirit, through the world ; when (as is afterwards said, v. 15.) " they that are afar off shall come and build in the temple of the Lord ; " and the inhabitants of one city shall go to an- other, saying, Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of hosts ; I will go also. Many people and strong nations," &c. chap. viii. 20, 21, 22. Ten men out of all languages to one Jew, that shall say, We will go with you, for we have heard that God is with you. Mic. iv. 2. This, 'tis said, shall be at Jerusalem, but it must be principally meant of the New Jerusalem, that Cometh down from heaven, that is from above, that is iree with her children, and is the mother of us all. And how plentiful an effusion of Spirit ! how mighty and gene- ral an attraction, by it, is signified in all this, by which so deeply rooted an aversion to God and serious living re- ligion, as is known to be common to men, is overcome, and turned into willingness and inclination towards him ! And whereby that great primary temple, CHRIST, replenished with the divine fulness, multiplies itself into so many, or enlarges itself into that one, his church ; called also his body, (as both his very body and that church are called his temple,) the fulness of him that filleth all in all. Nor needs it scruple us, or give us any trouble, that we find this name of a temple placed upon a good man singly and alone, sometimes upon the whole community of such together. Each one bears a double habitude — direct towards God, by which he is capable of being his private mansion ; collateral towards our fellow Christians, where- by he is a part of his more enlarged dwelling. Whensoever then any accession is made to this spiritual temple, begun in Christ himself, it is done by a further diffusion of that Spirit, whereof that original Temple is the first receptacle. VIII. But moreover, because it was a rational subject that was to be wrought upon, it is also to be expected that the work itself be done in a rational way. These that must be made living, and that were before intelligent stones, were not to be hewed, squared, polished, and moved to and fro by a violent hand; but being to be rendered b Isa. xxviii. cPsuMii cxvfu. dl Peter ii. willing, must be dealt with in a way suitable to the effect to be wrought. They are themselves to conie as lively stones, to the living Corner-stone, by a vital act of their own will; which, we know, is not to be moved by force, but rational allurement. Wherefore this being the thing to be brought about, it is not enough to inquire or under- stand by what power, but one would also covet to know by what motive or inducement, is this willingness and vital co-operation brought to pass ; and we shall find this origi- nal Temple, the Emmanuel, had not only in it a spring of sufficient power, but also, 2dly, Carried with it enough of argument and rational inducement, whereby to persuade and overcome our wills into a cheerful compliance and consent. And that, IX. 1. As it was itself the most significant demon- stration of divine love, ih?ir\. which nothing is more apt to move and work upon the spirit of man. The bonds of love are the cords of a man, (Hos. xi. 4.) of an attractive power, most peculiarly suitable to human nature: We love him, because he first loved us, 1 John iv. This is rational magnetism. When in the whole sphere of beings we have so numerous instances of things that propagate themselves, and beget their like, can we suppose the divine love to be only barren and destitute of this power"? And we find, among those that ^re born of God, there is no- thing more eminently conspicuous, in this production, than love. This new creature were otherwise a dead creature. This is its very heart, life, and soul ; that which acts and moves it towards God, and is the spring of all holy ope- rations. Since then love is found in it, and is so eminent a part of its composition, what should be the parent of this love, but lovel Nor is this a blind or unintelligent production, in respect of the manner of it, either on the part of that which begets, or of that which is begotten : not only he who is propagating his own love, designs it, and knows what he is about, but he that is hereby made to love, knows whereto he is to be formed, and receives, through an enlightened mind, the very principle, power, and spirit of love. Is his love the cause of ours ; or do we love him, because he loved us first 1 And what sort of cause is it 1 or how doth it work its effect, otherwise than as his love, testified and expressing itself, lets us see how reasonable and congruous it is," that we should love back again 1 As is more than intimated, by the same sacred writer, in that epistle : " Hereby perceive we the love of God," &c. chap. iii. 16. Somewhat or other must first render his love perceivable to us, that thereby we may be induced to love him for his own, and our brother for his sake. And again, " We have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love," &c. After which it shortly follows, " We love him, because he first loved us;" q. d,. The way of God's bringing us to that love- union with himself, that we by love dwell in him, and he in us, is, by his representing himself a Being of love. Till he beget in us that apprehension of himself, and we be brought to know and believe the love that he hath to- wards us, this is not done. But where have we that representation of God's love toward us, save in Emmanuel 1 This is the sum of the ministry of reconciliation, or which is all one, of making men love God, to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself, &c. 2 Cor. v. 18, 19. This was the very make and frame, the consti- tution and design, of the original Temple, to be the " Ta- bernacle of witness ;" a visible testimony of the love of God, and of his kind and gracious propensions towards the race of men, however they were become an apostate and degenerous race; to let them see how inclined and willing he was to become acquainted again with them, and that the old intimacy and friendship, long since out-worn, might be renewed. And this gracious inclination was testified, parity by Christ's taking up his abode on earth ; or by the erecting of this original Temple, by the Word's being made flesh, (John iv.) wherein (as the Greek ex- presses it f ) he did tabernacle among us. That whereas we did dwell here in earthly tabernacles, (only now destitute and devoid of the divine presence,) he most kindly comes and pitches his tent amongst our tents ; sets up his taberna- cle by ours, replenished and full of God ; so that here the e Zecli. ill. 8, 9. f MKr)V(jiOev. Chap. V. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 81 divine glory was familiarly visible, the glory of the only begotten Son of the Father, shining with mild and gentle rays, such as should allure, not affright us, npr their terror make us afraid. A vail is most condescendingly put on, lest majesty should too potently strike disaccustomed and misgiving minds ; and what is more terrible of this glory, is allayed by being interwoven with " grace and truth." Upon this account might it now truly be proclaimed, " Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men !" That is performed which once seemed hardly credible, and (when that temple was raised that was intended but for a type and shadow of this) was spoken of with wondering expos- tulation : " In very deed will God dwell with men on earth !" "Whereas it might have been reasonably thought this world should have been for ever forsaken of God, and no appearance of him ever have been seen here, unless with a design of taking vengeance ; how unexpected and surprising a thing was this, that in a state of so comfortless darlcness and desolation, the " day-spring from on high should visit it," and that God should come down and settle himself in so mean a dwelling, on purpose to seek the acquaintance of his offending, disaffected creature ! But chiefly and more eminently this his gracious inclina- tion was testified, — By the manner and design of his leaving this his earthly abode, and yielding that his temple to destruction : " De- stroy this temple, and I will raise it up." This being an animated living temple, could not be destroyed without sense of pain, unto which it could not willingly become subject, but upon design ; and that could be no other than a design of love. When he could have commanded twelve legions of angels to have been the guardians of this temple, to expose it to the violence of profane and barbarous hands ! this could proceed from nothing but love ; and greater love could none show, especially if we consider what was the designed event. This temple was to fall but single, that it might be raised manifold : it was intended (as it came to pass) to be multiplied by being destroyed ; as himself elegantly illustrates the matter : " Verily, verily, I say imto you. Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone; but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit ;" (John xii.) which he afterwards expresses without a metaphor. " And I, if I be lifted up from the earth," signifying, as it follows, the death he should die, " will draw all men unto me." We will not here insist on what was said before, that hereby the way was opened for the emission of the Spirit, which, when it came forth, performed such wonders in this kind, creating and forming into temples many a disaffected unwilling heart. Whence it may be seen, that he forsook that his present dwelling ; not that he might dwell here no longer, but only to change the manner of his dwelling, and that he might dwell here more to common advantage: the thing he intended, when he came down. He came down, that b}^ dying, and descending low into the lower parts of the earth, he might make way for a glorious ascent; and ascended, that he might fill all things; (Eph. iv.) that he might give gifts to men, even the rebellious also, that he might dwell among them, Ps. Ixviii. Not, I say, to insist on this, which shows the power by which those great effects were wrought, we may also here consider the way wherein they were wrought ; ?'. e. by way of representalion and demonstration of the divine love to men. How brightly did this shine, in the glorious ruin and fall of this temple ! Herein, how did redeeming love triumph ! how mightily did it conquer, and slay the enmity that wrought in the minds of men before ! Here he overcame by dying, and slew by being slain. Now were his arrows sharp in the hearts of enemies, by which they became subject, Ps. xlv. What wounded him, did, by a strong reverberation, wound them back again. How inwardly were thousands of them pierced by the sight of him whom thev had pierced ! How sharp a sting" was in those words, " There- fore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye crucified, both Lord and Christ !" Acts ii. For it immediately follows, " When they heard this, they were pricked to the heart." They that crucified him, are crucified with him; are now in agonies, and willing to vield to any thingthev are required: " Men and brethren, what shall we do "!" He mav have temples now, for taking tnem ; the mo.st obdurate hearts are overcome : and what could be so potent an argument 1 what so accommodate to the nature of man ; so irresistible byiti To behold this live-temple of the living God, the sacred habitation of a Deity, full of pure and holy life and vigour, by vital union with the eternal Godhead, volunta- rily devoted and made subject to the most painful and ignominious suffering, purposely to make atonement for the offence done by revolted creatures against their rightful Lord ! What rocks would not rent at this spectacle 1 Enough to put the creation (as it did) into a paroxysm, and bring upon it travailing pangs ! And how strange if the hearts of men, only next and most closely concerned, should alone be unmoved, and wit! out the sense of such pangs! Well might it be said, " I, if I be lift up, will draw all men," without any such diminishing sense as to mean by that all a very few only ; not intending so much by it the effect wrought, (though that also be not incon- siderable,) as the power, or natural aptitude of the cause, q. d. This were enough to vanquish and subdue the world, to mollify every heart of man ; and to leave the character upon them of most inhuman creatures, and imworthy to be called men, that shall not be dra-^Ti. It might be 'ex- pected, that every one that hath not abandoned humanitj', or hath the spirit of a man in him, should be wrought upon by this means : and they cannot but incur most fear- ful guilt, even all men, who once having notice of this matter, are not effectually wrought upon by it. Upon which account, the apostle asks the Galatians, (who had not otherwise seen this sight than as the gospel- narrative had represented it to them,) who had bewitched them that they should not obey, before whose eyes Christ had been set forth crucified among them ; intimating, that he could not account them less than bewitched, whom the representation of Christ crucified did not captivate into his obedience. And since, in his crucifixion, he was a sacri- fice, i. e. placatory and reconciling, and that reconciliations are always mutual, of both the conlending parties to one another, it must have the proper influence of a sacrifice immediately upon both, and as well mollify men's hearts towards God, as procure that he should express favourable inclinations towards them. That is, that all enmity should cease, and be abolished for ever ; that wrongs be forgotten, rights restored, and entire friendship, amity, emd free con- verse, be renewed, and be made perpetual. All which signifies, that by this means the spirits of men be so wrought upon that they render back to God his own tem- ple, most willingly, not merely from an apprehension of his right, but as overcome by "his love; and valuing his presence more than their own life. Guilt is very apt lo be always jealous. No wonder if the spirits of men, conscious of so great wrong done to God, (and a secret consciousness there may be even where there are not very distinct and explicit reflections upon the case,) be not very easily in- duced to think God reconcilable. And while he is" not thought so, what can be expected but obstinate aversion on their part 1 For what so hardens as despair 1 Much indeed might be collected, by deeply-considering minds, of a propension, on God's part, to peace and friendship, from the course of his providence, and present dispensation towards the world ; his clemenc}-, long-suffering, and most of all his bounty, towards them. These lead to repent- ance in their own natural tendency : yet are thev but dull insipid gospel in themselves, to men drowned in sensualitv, buried in earthliness, in whom the Divine Spirit breathes not, and who have provoked the B. Spirit to keep at a distance, by having stupified and laid asleep the consider- ing power of their own spirit. Nor are these the usual means, apart and by themselves, which the Spirit of Gxxl is wont to work by upon the hearts of men. as experience and observation of the common stale of the pagan world doth sadly testify, and without the concurrence of that blessed Spirit, even the most apt and suitable means avail nothing. But now where this is so express a testification, as we find in the gospel of Christ, of Grod's willingness to be reconciled ; a proclamation distinctlv made, that imports no other thing but srlory to God in the highest, peace on earth, and good-will towards men ; (for confirmation whereof, the Son of God incarnate is represented slain. THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. and offered up a bloody sacrifice ; and that we might see at once both that God is reconcilable, by the highest de- monstration imaginable, and how or upon what terms he comes to be so;) no place for reasonable doubt any longer remains. We have before our eyes what, by the wonder- ful strangeness of it, should engage the most stupid minds to consider the matter; what ought to assure the most misgiving doubtful mind, that God is in good earnest, and^intends no mockery or deceit in his offer of peace ; and what ought to melt, mollify, and overcome the most obdurate heart. Yea, not only what is in its own nature most aj.t to work towards the producing these happy effects is here to be foimd, but wherewith also the Spirit of grace is ready to concur and co-work ; it being his pleasure, and most lit and comely in itself, that he should choose to unite and fall in with the aptest means, and apply him- self to the spirits of men in a way most suitable to their own natures, and most likely to take and prevail with the-n: whereupon the Gospel is called the "ministration of spirit and life, and the power of God to salvation." But that this gospel, animated by that mighty and good Spirit, hath not universally spread itself over all the world, only its own resolved and resisting wickedness is the faulty cause ; otherwise there had been gospel, and temples raised by it, every where. IX. 2. This original primary temple hath matter of rational inducement'in it ; as it gives us a plain represent- ation of divine holiness, brightly shining in human nature. For here was to be seen a most pure, serene, dispassionate mind, unpolluted by any earthly tincture, inhabiting an earthly tabernacle, like our own. A mind adorned with the most amiable, lovely virtues, faith, patience, temper- ance, godliness ; full of all righteousness, goodness, meek- ness, mercifulness, sincerity, humility ; most abstracted from this world, unmoveably intent upon what had refer- ence to a future stale of things, and the affairs of another yountiy ; inflexible by the blandishments of sense ; not «pt to judge by the sight of the eye, or be charmed by what •were most grateful to a voluptuous ear ; full of pity towards a wretched, sinful world, compassionate to its calamities, unprovoked by its sharpest injuries ; bent upon doing the greatest good, and prepared to the suffering of whatsoever evil. Here was presented to common view a life transacted agreeably to such a temper of mind ; of one invariable tenor : equal, uniform, never unlike itself, or disagreeing with the exactest or most strict rules. Men might see a God was come down to dwell among them ; " The Bright- ness of the Father's glory, and the express Image of his person ;" a Deity inhabiting human flesh ; for such pur- poses as he came for, could not be supposed to carry any more becoming appearance than he did. Here was, there- fore, an exemplary temple, the fair and lovely pattern of what we were each of us to be composed and formed unto : imitating us (for sweeter insinuation and allurement) in what was merely natural, and inviting us to imitate him in what was (in a communicable sort) supernatural and divine. Every one knows how great is the power of example, and may collect how apt a method this was to move and draw the spirits of men. Had only precepts and instructions been given men, how they were to prepare and adorn in themselves a temple for the living God, it had, indeed, been a great vouchsafement ; but how much had it fallen short of what the present state of man did, in point of means, need, and call for ! How great a defalca- tion were it from the gospel, if we did want the history of the life of Christ ! But not only to have been told of what materials the temple of God must consist, but to have seen them composed and put together ; to have opportu- nity of viewing the beautiful frame in every part, and of beholding the lovely, imitable glory of the whole, and which we are to follow, though we cannot with equal steps; how merciful condescension, and how great an advantage is this unto us ! We have here a state of entire devoted- nesR to God (the principal thing in the constitution of his temple) exemplified before our eyes, together with what was most suitable besides to such state. Do we not see how, in a body of flesh, one may be subject to the will of God ; to count the doing of it our meat and drink 1 When it imposes any thing grievous to be suffered, to say, " Not luy will, but thine be done"?" How in all things to seek not our own glory, but his? and not to please ourselves, but him "? How hereby to keep his blessed presence with us, and live in his constant converse and fellowship, nevei to be left alone ; but to have him ever with us, as alway.' aiming to do the things that please him 1 Do we not know how to be tempted, and abstain ; injured, and forgive ; disobliged, and do good ; to live in a tumultuous world, and be at peace within ; to dwell on earth, and have our conversation in heaven 1 We see all this hath been done, and much more than we can here mention : and by so lively a representation of the brightest divine excellences, beautifying this original exemplary temple, we have a two- fold most considerable advantage towards our becoming such ; viz. that hereby both the 'possibility and the loveliness of a temple (the thing we are now ourselves to design) is here represented to our view ; by the former whereof we might be encouraged, by the latter allured, unto imitation ; that working upon our hope, this upon our desire and love, in order hereto. 1. The possibility. I mean it not in the strict sense only, as sigfnifying no more than that the thing, simply consider- ed, implies no repugnance in itself, nor is without the reach of absolute omnipotence ; for as no one needs to be told that such a thing is (in this sense) possible, so to be told it, would sigTiify little to his encouragement. There are many things in this sense not impossible, whereof no man can, however, have the least rational hope ; as, that another world may shortly be made ; that he may be a prince, or a great man, therein ; with a thousand the like. But I mean it of what is possible to divine power, {i. e. to the grace and Spirit of God,) now ready to go forth in a way and method of operation already stated and pitched upon for such purposes. For having the representation before our eyes of this original Temple, i. e. God inhabiting hu- man flesh on earth, we are not merely to consider it as it is in itself, and to look upon it as a strange thing, or as a glorious spectacle, wherein we are no further concerned, than only to look upon it, and take notice that there is or hath been seen such a thing ; but we are to consider how it came to pass, and with what design it was that such a thing should be, and become obvious to our view. Why have we such a sight offered us 1 or what imports it unto us1 And when we have informed ourselves, by taking the account the gospel gives us of this matter, and viewed the inscription of that great name, Emmanuel, by wonderful contrivance, inwrought into the very constitution of this temple, we will then find this to be intended for a leading case ; and that this temple was meant for a model and platform of that which we ourselves are to become ; or, after which the temple of God in us must be composed and formed ; and so, that this matter is possible to an ordinate, divine power, even to that mighty Spirit that resides eminently in this temple, on purpose to be trans- mitted thence to us, for the framing of us to the likeness of it ; and so that the thing is not merely possible, but de- signed also, viz. that as he was, so we might be in this world : (1 John iv.) unto which is necessary our believing intuition towards him, or a fiducial acknowledgment that this Jesus is the Son of God, come down on purpose into human flesh, to bring about a union between God and us whereupon that union itself ensues : the matter is brought about, we come to dwell in God, and he in us, v. 15. And this wc collect and conclude from hence, that we find the same Spirit working and breathing in us, which did in him ; " Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit," v. 13. And though it was an unmeasured fulness of this Spirit which dwelt in tins primary temple, yet we are taught and en- couraged hence to expect that a sufficient and proportion- able measure be imparted to us, that we may appear not altogether unlike or unworthy of him ; that this temple and ours are of the same make, and " both he that sancti- fieth, and they that are sanctified, are all of one ;" that we so far agree with our original, that he may not be ashamed to call us brethren, Heb. ii. And how aptly doth this tend to excite and raise our hope of some great thing to be effected in this kind in us, when we have the matter thus exemplified already before our eyes, and do behold the exact and perfect model according whereto we ourselves are to be framed. Nor doth that signify a little to the Jhap. V. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 83 drawing of our wills, or the engaging us to a consent and co-operation, as the under-bnilders, in the work of this temple. A design that in itself appears advantageous, needs no more to set it on foot, than that it be represented hopeful. No one, that understands any thing of the nature of man, is ignorant of the power of hope. This one engine moves the world, and keeps all men busy. Every one soon finds his present state not perfectly good, and hopes some way to make it better ; otherwise, the world were a dull scene. Endeavour would languish, or rather be none at all : for there were no room left for design, or a rational enterprising of any thing ; but a lazy unconcerned tnflmg, without care which end goes forward, and with an utter indiflerency whether to stir or sit still. Men are not, in their other designs, without hope, but their hope is placed upon things of no value ; and when they have gained the next thing they hoped for and pursued, they are as far stiU as they were from what they meant that for. They have obtained their nearer end, but therein have mistook their way; which they designed by it, to their further end. When they have attained to be rich, yet they are not happy; perhaps much further from it than before. When they have preyed upon the pleasure they had in chase, they are still imsatisfied ; it may be, guilty reflections turn it all to gall and wormwood. Many such disappointments might make them consider, at length, they have been out all this while, and mistaken the whole nature and kind of the good that must make them happy. They may come to think with themselves, Somewhat is surely lacking, not only to our present enjoyment, but to our very design ; somewhat it must be without the compass of all our former thoughts, wherein our satisfying good must lie. God may come into their minds ; and they may cry out, Oh ! that is it ; here it was I mistook, and had forgot myself. Man once had a God ! and that God had his temple, wherein he resided, and did converse with man : hither he must be invited back. Yea, but his temple lies all in ruin, long ago deserted and disused, forsaken upon provocation, and with just resentment ; the ruin to be repaired by no mortal hand ; the wrong done to be expatiated by no ordinary sa- crifice. All this imports nothing but despair. But let now the Emmanuel be brought in ; this origimal Temple be offered to view, and the design and intent of it be un- folded and laid open ; and what a spring of hope is here ! Or what can now be wanting to persuade a wretched soul of God's willingness to return 7 Or, being now sensible of his misery by his absence, to make it willing of his re- turn ; yea, and to contribute the utmost endeavour that all things may be prepared and put into due order for his reception 1 Or if any thing should be still wanting, it is but Avhat may more work upon desire, as well a,s beget hope : and to this purpose, a narrower view of this origi- nal Temple also serves ; that is, it not only shows the pos- sibility, but gives us opportunity to contemplate, 2. The loveliness too of such a temple. For here is the fairest representation that ever this world had, or that could be had, of this most delectable object. The Divine holiness incarnate did never shine so bright. And we may easily apprehend the great advantage of having so lively and perfect a model set before us of what we are to design and aim at. Rules and precepts could never have afibrd- ed so full a description, or have furnished us with so per- fect an idea. He that goes to build a house, must have the project formed in his mind before ; and (as hath been said) he is to make a material hou.se of an immaterial. So here, we may say the real house is t-o be built out of the mental or notional one. It is true indeed, when we have got into our minds the true and full idea or model of this temple, our greatest difficult)^ is not yet over: how happy were it, if the rest of our work would as soon be done ! And our hearts would presently obey our light. If they were ductile, and easy to )aeld, and receive the stamp and impression that would correspond to a well enlightened mind ; if we could presently become conform and like to the notions we have of what we should be : what excel- lent creatures should we appear, if on the sudden our spi- rits did admit the habitual, fixed frame of holiness, where- of we sometimes have the idea framed in our minds! But though to have that model truly formed in our under- standings be not sufficient, it is however necessary: and although our main work is not immediately done by it, it can never be done without it. Truth is the means of ho- liness : " Sanctify them through thy truth." John xvii. 17. God hath chosen us to salvation, through sanctification of the Spirit and beliefof the truth, 2Thess. ii. 3. Therefore it is our great advantage to have the most entire and full notion that may he, of that temper and frame of spirit we should be of. When the charge was given Moses of com- posing the tabernacle, (that moveable temple,) he had the perfect pattern of it shown him in the mount. And to re- ceive the very notion aright of this spiritual living tem- ple, requires a some-way prepared mind, purged from vi- cious prejudice and perverse thoughts, possessed with dis- like of our former pollutions and deformities ; antecedent whereto is a more general view of that frame whereimto we are to be composed, and then a more distinct represen- tation is consequent thereon. As we find the prophet is di- rected first to show the people the house, that they might be ashamed : whereupon it follows, if they be ashamed of that they have done, then he must show them the form of the house, and the fashion thereof, and the goings out thereof, and the comings in thereof, and all the ordinances thereof, Ezek. xliii. 10, 11. How much would it conduce to the work and service of God's temple in us, if upon our having had some general intimation of his gracious propensions towards us, to repair our ruins, and restore our forlorn, decayed state, we begin to lament after him, and conceive inward resentments of the impurities and desolations of our souk : and shall now have the distinct representation set before our eyes, of that glorious work- manship which he means to express in our renovation ! How taking and transporting a sight will this be to a soul that is become vile and loathsome in its own eyes, and weary of being as without God in the world ! But now, wherein shall he be understood to give us so exact an ac- count of his merciful intendments and design in this mat- ter, as b)' letting us see how his glory shone in his own incarnate Son, his express Image ; and then signifying his pleasure and purpose to have us conformed to the same image. This is his most apt and efficacious method, when he goes about to raise his new creation, and erect his inner temple ; (as it was, in some respect, his way, when he made his first great outer temple of the M'orld ;") "God, that commanded light to shine out of darkness, haln shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ," 2 Cor. iv. That glory shines with greatest advantage to our transforma- tion, in the face or aspect of Emmanuel. When we set our faces that way, and our eye meets his, we put ourselves into a purposed posture of intuition, and do steadily look to Jesus ; " when we, with open face, behold as in a glass the glory of the Lord, we are changed from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord," 2 Cor. iii. His very Spirit enters with those vital beams; enters at our eye, and is thence transfused through our whole soul. The seed and generative principle of the new creature is truth ; " Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but incorruptible, the word of God," 1 Peter i. '23. We must understand it of practical truth, or that which serves to show what we are to be and do, (ck. ii. 1, "2, 3, 4.) in our new and regenerate state. Hereby souls are begotten to God, hereby they live and grow, hereby they come and join as living stones to the living Corner-stone, in the com- position of this spiritual house : as we see the series of discourse runs in this context. Now we have this practical truth, not only exhibited in aphorisms and maxims in the word, but we have it exemplified in the life of Christ. And when the great renovating work is to be done, the old man to be put off, the new man to be put on, the spiric of our mind to be renewed, our business is to learn Christ, and the truth as it is in Jesus : (Eph. iv. 20, 21, 23, 24.) so is accomplished the formation of that new man that is after God. And when we become his (second) M-orkmauship, we are created in Christ Jesus imto good works ; caught into union with that Spirit which showed itself in the whole course of his conversation on earth, and is gradually to work and form us to an imitation of him. Whereunto we are not formed by mere looking on, or by our own con- templation only of his lite and actions, on the one hand: (our rigid hardness and ilitf aversion to such a temper and 84 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part n. course a^ his was, is not so easily altered and overcome :) nor, on the other hand, is our looking on useless and in vain, as if we were to be formed, like mere stones, into dead unmoving statues, rather than living temples ; or as if his Spirit were to do that work upon us, by a violent hand, while we know nothing of the matter, nor any way comply to the design. But the work must be done by the holding up the representation of this primary temple before our eyes, animated and replenished with divine life and glory, as our pattern, and the type by which we are to be formed, till our hearts be captivated and won to the love and liking of snch a state ; i. e. to be so united with God, so devoted to him, so stamped and impressed with all imi- table Godlike excellences, as he was : we are to be so ena- moured herewith, as to be impatient of remaining what we were before. And such a view contributed directly hereto, and in a way suitable to our natures. Mere tran- sient discourses of virtue and goodness, seem cold and un- savoury things to a soul drenched in sensuality, sunk into deep forgetfulness of God, and filled with aversion to ho- liness ; but the tract and course of a life evenly transacted, in the power of the Holy Ghost, and that is throughout uniform, and constantly agreeablelo itself, is apt, by often repeated insinuations, (as drops wear stones,) insensibly to recommend itself as amiable, and gain a liking even with them that were most opposite and disaffected. For the nature of man, in its most degenerate state, is not wholly destitute of the notions of virtue and goodness, nor of some faint approbation of them. The names of sincerity, hu- mility, sobriety, meekness, are of better sound and import, even with the worst of men, than of deceit, pride, riot, and wrathfulness : nor are they wont to accuse any for those former things, under their own names. Only when they •see the broken and more imperfect appearances of theni, and that they are rather otTered at than truly and con- stantly represented in practice ; this begets a prejudice, and the pretenders to thein become suspected of hypocrisy, or a conceited singularity, and are not censured as not being grossly evil, but rather that they are not thoroughly good. But when so unexceptionable a course is in con- stant view as our Saviour's was, this procures, even from the ruder vulgar, an acknowledgment he doth all things well, and carries that lustre and awful majesty, as to com- mand a veneration and respect; yea, is apt to allure those that more narrowly observe into a real love both of him and his way ; especially when it hath such a close and is- sue, as appears no way imworthy of himself, or his former pretensions. But all being taken together, resolves into the plainest demonstration of most sincere devotedness to God, and good-will to men ; upon which the great stress is laid : " And I, if I be lift up, will draw all men unto me." And how great a thing is done towards our entire com- pliance with the Redeemer's design of making us tem- ples to the living God, as he himself was, Avhen he, under that very notion, appears amiable in onr eyes ! How na- tural and easy is imitation unto love ! All the powers of the soul are now, in the most natural way, excited and set on work ; and we shall not easily be induced to satisfy ourselves, or admit of being at rest, till we attain a state, ■with the loveliness whereof our hearts are once taken and possessed beforehand. But nothing of all this is said with design, nor hath any tendency, to diminish or detract from that mighty power of the blessed Spirit of God, by whom men become willing of the return of the Divine presence into its ancient residence, and, in subordina- tion, active towards it ; but rather to magnify the excel- lency of that wisdom, which conducts all the exertions and operations of that power so suitably to the subject to be wrought upon, and the ends and purposes to be effected thereby. Upon the whole, the setting up of this original temple, inscribed with the great Emmanvel, or the whole consti- tution of Christ the mediator, hath, we see, set a very ap- parent aptitude- and rich sufficiency in its kind, to the com- posing of things between God and men ; the replenishing this desolate world with temples aa:ain every where, and those with the Divine presence; both as there was enough m it to procure remission of sin, enough to procure the emission of the Holv Spirit: an immense fulness both of righteousness and Spirit ; of righteousness for the former purpose, and of Spirit for the latter, and both of these, in distinct ways, capable of being imparted; because the power of imparling them was upon such terms obtained, as did satisfy the malediction and curse of the violated law, which must otherwise have everlastingly Avithheld both from apostate, offending creatures. It is not the righteousness of God, as such, that can make a guilty crea- ture guiltless, (which must rather oblige him still to hold him guilty,) or the Spirit of God, as such, that can make him holy. Here is a full fountain, but sealed and shut up; and what are we the better for that 1 But it is the right- eousness and Spirit of Emmanuel, God with us ; of him who was made sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him ; and who was made a curse for us, that we might have the blessing of the promi.sed Spirit: otherwise, there were not in him a sufficiency to answer the exigency of the case ; but as the matter is, here is abundant sufficiency in both respects, as we have already seen. And therefore, the only thing that remains to be shown herein, — is the necessity and requisiteness of such means as this, unto this end. For Avhen w^e take no- tice of so great and so rare a thing as an Emmanuel, set up in the world ; and find by this solemn constitution of him, by the condition of his person, his accomplishments, performances, sufferings, acquisitions, the powers and vir- tues belonging to him, that everj' thing hath so apt an as- pect, and is so accommodate to the restitution of lost man, and of God's temple in and with him ; we cannot but con- fess, here is a contrivance worthy of God, sufficient for its end. So that the work needs not fail of being done, if in this way it prove not to be overdone ; or if the apparatus be not greater than was needful for the intended end ; or that the same purposes might not have been effected at an easier rate. I design therefore to speak distinctly and se- verally of the necessity of this course, in reference, 1. To the remission of sin. 2. To the emission or communica- tion of the Spirit : and do purposely reserve several things concerning this latter, to be discoursed under this head: after the necessity of this same course for the former pur- pose (Avherein the latter also hath its foundation) hath been considered. CHAPTER VI, The nece^nity of ttiis constihition of Emmanuel to the erecting God's temple in the world. The discoursing of this matter, proper on this occasion. As to God's part herein, tirst, proposed to show, hoth that a recompense was ne- cessarj' to be made, and that it could be made no other way. Towards the evincing the ff)rmer, sundry things gradually laid down. The point itselfar- gued, by considering the injury done to the divine, with m hat we may sup- pose done to a human government ; where repentance not constantly thought asufficient recompence ; othenvise, a penitent delinquent was never to be punished Difference between God's pardon and man's in most usual cases. Recompense fijr wrong done to government, quite another thing from what answers the appetite of private revenge. Expressions that seem to import it in Ciod, how to be understood. Sliown that they import no more than a constant will so far to punish offences, as is necessary for the asserting and preserving the righ'^ and dignity of his government. So much most agreeable, and necessarily belonging to the perfection of the divine na- ture. And if the justice of a human government requires it, of the divine much more. It may here perhaps be said. Why might not the matter have been otherwise brought about ? Or, might not God of his mere sovereignty have remitted the wrong done to him, without any such atonement ; and, upon the same ac- count, have sent forth his Spirit to turn men's hearts'? And if that must work by arguments and rational persua- sives, w^ere there not others to have been used, sufficient to this purpose, though the Son of God had never become man, or died upon this account"? To use means exceeding the value of the end, may seem as unsuitable to the divine wisdom, as not to have used sufficient. And who can think the concernments of silly worms impossible to be managed, and brought to a fair and happy issue, without so great things as the incarnation and death of God's own Son ? Wherefore we proceed to show, as was promised, 2. The necessity, as the case stood, that this course should be taken for this end. No man can here think we mean that the end itself was otherwise necessary, than as the freest love and good- will made it so ; but /A«i sup- posed, we are only to evince that tliis course was the Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 83 necessary means to attain it. And as to this, if indeed that modesty and reverence were every where to be found, wherewith it would become dim-sighted man to judge of the ways of God, any inquiry of this kind might be for- borne ; and it would be enough to put us out of doubt, that this WELs the most equal and fittest way, that we see it is the way which God hath taken. But that cross temper hath foimd much place in the world, rather to dispute God's methods, than comport with them, in an obedient thankful compliance and subserviency to their intended ends. And how deeply is it to be resented, that so mo- mentous a thing in the religion of Christians, and that above all other should be the subject and incentive of ad- miring, devout thoughts and affections, should ever have been made intricate and perplexed by disputation ! That the food of life should have been filled with thorns and gravel ! And what was most apt to beget good blood, and turn all to strength, vigour, and spirit, should be rendered the matter of a disease ! This can never enough be taken to heart. What complaints might the tortured, famished church of Christ send up against the ill instruments of so great a mischief! " Lord ! we asked bread, and they gave us a stone. They have spoiled the provisions of thy house. Our pleasantest fare, most delicious and strengthening viands, they have made tasteless and unsavoury." What expostulations might it use with them ! " Will you not let us live? Can nothing in our religion be so sacred, so im- portant, as to escape your perverting hands V The urgency of the case itself permits not that this matter be silently passed over : a living temple needs the apt means of nourishment and growth ; and it must be nourished and grow, by what is suitable to its constitu- tion : unto which nothing is more inward, than the laying this " living Corner-stone." We will acknowledge the reasons of divers things in God's determinations and appointments may be very deeply hidden, not only from our more easy view, but our most diligent search: where they are, his telling us the matter is so, or so, is reason enough to us to believe with reve- rence. But when they offer themselves, we need not be afraid to see them ; and when the matter they concern is brought in question, should be afraid of being so treache- rous as not to produce them. Now that it was requisite this temple should be so found- ed as hath been said, is a matter not only not repugnant to the common reason of man, but which fairly approves itself thereunto: that is, so far as that though it exceed all human thought, the great Lord of heaven and earth, infinitely injured by the sin of man, should so wonderfully condescend ; yet w^hen his good pleasure is plainly ex- pressed, touching the end, that nothing could be so appa- rently congruous, so worthy of himself, so accommodate to his design, as the way which he hath avowedly taken to bring it about. That it might be brought about, (as in all reconciliations, and as hath been said concerning this,) a compliance was necessary, and a mutual yielding of both the distanced parties; i. e. that God consent to return to his desolate temple, and that man consent or be willing he should. We have sho'mi that the constitution and use of the original temple, whereof the account hath been given, was sufficient, and aptly conducing unto both. Now being to show wherein they were also requisite or necessary to the one and the other, we must acknowledge them not alike immediately necessary to each of these ; and must there- fore divide the things in order whereto this course was taken, and speak of them severall}'. Nor are they to be so divided, as though the procurement of God's return for his part, and of man's admitting thereof for his part, were throughout to be severally considered ; for God's part is larger than man's, and some way runs into it : he is not only to give his own consent, but to gain man's ; and be- sides his own willing return to repossess this his temple, he is to make man willing also : or rather that return or repossession, rightly understood, will be found to include the making of man willing ; i. e. in that very return and repossession, he is to put forth that measure of power and influence, by which he may be made so. All this is Gtod's a This 2d head cornea to be diacouraed Chap. vtii. Sect. 1, &c. 10 part, which he doth graciously undertake, and ■without which nothing could be effected in this matter. But then because man is to be wrought upon in a way suitable to his reasonable nature, he is to have such things offered to his consideration, as in their own nature tend to persuade him; and which that power and spirit, to be put forth, may use as proper means to that purpose. Now it is man's part to consider such things, and consent thereupon. Our business here, therefore, is to show how necessary the con- stitution of Emmanuel was, chiefly and principally as to what now appears to be God's part: and afterward, to say somewhat as to our own. — To the former, it was requisite that the original Temple, Emmanuel, should be set up, and be used to such immediate purposes as have been ex- pressed ; to the latter, was requisite the declaration hereof. — To the one, that such a constitution should be ; to the other, that it be made known to man. II. First, then, in reference to the former, this constitution was necessarj", that so there might be a sufficient means for the previous expiation of the offence done to the majesty of God ; or that the injurious violation of his sa- cred rights might be sufficiently recompensed. And here, more particularly, two things are to be cleared ; fHrst, That in order to God's return, it was necessar}' such a full recompense should be made him ; secondly, That it could not be full any other way than this, by Emmanuel.'' In discoursing of which things, it is not intended to go in the usual way of controversy, to heap up a great number of arguments, and discuss particularly ever}- little cavil that maybe raised on the contrary part ; but plainly to offer such considerations as may lend to clear the truth, and rather prevent than formally answer objections against it. Wherefore we say, (1.) it was necessary God's return and vouchsafement of his gracious restored presence to man, as his temple, should be upon teims of recompense made him (or as certain to be made) for the indignity and wrong done in the former violation thereof. We do not here need to be curious in inquiring, whether the consideration of this recompense to be made, had influence on the gracious purpose of God in this matter, or only on the execution thereof. Nor indeed hath the doubt anyproper ground in the present case, which, where it hath disquieted the minds of any, seems to have pro- ceeded from our too great aptness to measure God by ourselves, and prescribe to him the same methods we our- selves are wont to observe. That is, we find it is our way, when we have a design to bring about, upon which we are intent, first to propound the end to ourselves which we would have effected, then to deliberate and consult by what means to effect it: whereupon, we assign to the blessed God the same course. But to him, all his works are known from the beginning of the world ; and he ever beheld, at one view, the whole tract and course of means whereby any thing is to be done, which he intends with the intended end itself So that we have no reason to affix to him any thought or purpose of favour towards the sinful sons of men, ancienter or more early than his prospect of the way wherein that favourable purpose was to be accom- plished. Nor again can any act or purpose of his towards his creatures be otherwise necessary to him, than from the essential rectitude of the counsels of his own will : the determinations whereof are such as might not have been, or might have been otherwise, where the thing determined was, by those measures, a matter of indifferency. Where it was not so, thej' are (however necessary, yet also) in that sense most free ; as they are directed and approved by his infinite wisdom, and attended with that complacency which naturally accompanies any act or purpose that is in itself most exceptionably congruous, just, and good. It may furthermore be truly said, that nothing ought to be reckoned possible to him, upon the agreement only which it holds lo some one attribute of his, considered singly and apart from all the rest : as, for instan<"e. in what is next our present case, to forgive all the sins that ever were committed against him, without insisting upon any compensation, were vainly alleged to be correspondent to boundless sovereign mercy, if it will not as well accord THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. with infinite wisdom, justice, and holiness; as it would be imreasonably said to be agreeable enough to him, to thr&w all the creatures that never offended him mto an endless nothingness, in consideration only of the abso- luteness of his power and dominion. But whatsoever he can do, must be understood to be agreeable to a Being absolutely and every way perfect. Moreover we add, that whatsoever is most congruous and fit for him to do, that is truly necessary to him : he cannot swerve in the least tittle, we will not only say from what strict and rigorous justice doth exact and challenge, but also not from what is requisite, under the notion of most comely and decent. Hath it been said of a mortal man, that it was as easy to alter the course of the sun, as to turn him from the path of righteousness 1 We must suppose it of the eternal God equally impossible that he should be diverted from, or ever omit to do, what is most seemly, becoming, and worthy of himself In such things wherein he is pleased to be our pattern, what we know to be oar own duty, we must conclude is his nature : we ought to be found neither in an unjust act or omission, nor undecent one; and he cannot. And if it belong to us to do what is good, it more necessarily belongs to him to do what is best; i. e. in all things that are any way capable of coming under a moral consideration : for as in other matters it is permitted to us to act arbitrarily, so there is nothing hinders but he may much more. Wherefore it is not hence to be thought that therefore it was necessary this imiverse and every thing in it should have been made as perfect as thev could be ; as if we ourselves will make any thing for our own use, nothing obliges us to be so very curious about it, as that it may be as neat and accurate as we can devise to make it ; it will sufhce if it be such as will serve our turn. And indeed, in the works of nature, it would have been less worthy of God to have expressed a scrupulous curiosity that nothing might ever fall out be- sides one fixed rule, (especially in a state of things de- signed for no long continuance,) that should extend to all imaginable particularities ; as that all men should be of the comeliest stature, all faces of the most graceful aspect, with a thousand the like. But in matters wherein there can l>e better and worse, in a moral sense, it seems a prin- ciple of the plainest evidence, that the blessed God cannot but do that which is simply the best ; yea, while a neces- sity is upon us not only to mind things that are true, and just, and pure, but also that are lovely and of good report, we have no cause to doubt, but whatsoever is comely, and beseeming his most perfect excellences, is an eternal, in- dispensable law to him: wherefore it is not enough to con- sider, in the present case, what it were strictly not unjust for him to do, but what is fit and becoming so excellent and glorious a majesty as his. Nor now can it be a" doubt, but that he only is the compe- tent Judge of what is becoming and worthy of himself; or what is most congruous and fit in itself to be done ; (Isa. xl.) " Who hath'directed the Spirit of the Lord, or being his counsellor, hath instructed him !" &c. Surely the best reason we can exercise in this case, is to think that course reasonable which we find God hath chosen, although we had no insight at all into the matter. There are many constitutions which we have occasion to observe in the course of God's government over the world, which, by the constancy of them, we have ground to think founded in indispensable necessity; though the reasons whereupon they are necessary, are most deeply latent and hidden from us. Not to speak of the abstruser paths and methods of nature, wherein while we observe a constancy, yet perhaps we apprehend it might have been some other way as well : perhaps it might, but it is more than v/e know. And though, as hath been said, we have reason to suppose that the ways God hath taken, in matters of this sort, may be more absolutely arbitrary ; yet the constant iteration of the same thing, or continuation of the ancient settled course, shows the peremptoriness of the Creator's counsel; and seems to carry with it an implied rebuke of our ignorant rashness, in thinking it might as well be otherwise ; and a stiff asserting of his determinations against us. There are none so well studied naturalists, as to be able to give a rational account why it is so, and so, in many instances ; wherein they may yet discern the inflexibleness of nature,, and perceive her methods to be as unalterable, as they are unaccountable. 'Tis true, this is obvious to be seen by any eye, that where things are well, as they are, constancy doth better than innovation, or change ; but it very much becomes human modesty to suppose, that there may, in many cases, be other reasons to justify the present course, which we see not. But we may, with more advantage, consider the fixedness of that order which God hath set, unto the course of his dispensation, towards his intelligent creatures : wherein we shall only instance in some few particulars. As first, that there is so little discernible commerce, in the present state, between the superior rank of these crea- tures, and the inferior. That whereas we are well assured there are intelligent creatures, which inhabit not earthly bodies like ours, but hold an agreement with us in greater things ; they yet so rarely converse with us. When we consider that such of them as remain innocent, and such of us as are, by Divine mercy, recovered out of a state of apostacy, are all subject to the same common Lord ; ob- serve the more substantial things of the same law; have all the same common end ; are acted by the same principle of love, devotedness, and zeal for the interest and honour of ihe great Maker, and Lord of all things. We are all to make up one community with them, and be associates in the same future blessed state ; yet, they have little inter- course with us, they shun our sight. If sometimes they appear, it is by transient, hasiy glances ; they are strangely shy and reserved towards us, they check our inquiries, put us, and appear to be themselves in reference thereto, under awful restraints. We know not the reason of all this, sometimes we may think with ourselves, those pure and holy spirits cannot but be full of kindness, benignity, and love, and concerned for us poor mortals, whom they see put to tug and conflict with many difficulties and calamities ; abused by the cimning malice of their and our enemy; imposed upon by the illusions of our own senses. How easily might they make many useful discoveries to us, relieve our ignorance in many things, acquaint us, more expressly, with the state of things in the other world, rectify our dark or mistaken apprehensions, concerning many both religious and philosophical matters I But they refrain, and we know not why. Again, that in the days of our Saviour's converse on earth, there should be so strange a connexion as to them, on whom he wrought miraculous cures, between the Di- vine power, and their faith ; so that, sometimes, we find it expressly said, He could do no mighty work, because of their unbelief. And we, lastly, instance in the fixedness of that course, which God hath set, for making known to the world the contents of the gospel of Christ: so that little is ever done therein, immediately, or by extraordinary means. The apostle Paul is stopped in the career of his persecu- tion, by an amazing voice, and vision; but he is left for instruction, as to his future course, to Ananias. Unto Cornelius an angel is sent, not to preach the gospel, but to direct him to send for Peter, for that purpose. The Lord doth not immediately himself instruct the Eunuch in the faith of Christ, but directs Philip to do it ; and experi- ence shows, that(according totherulesetin that case, Rom. X.) where they have no preachers, they have no gospel. Now^ as to all these cases, and many more that might be thought on, can it be said it would have been unjust, if God had ordered the matter otherwise than he hath 1 That we cannot so much as imagine, nor are we to think the matter determined as it is, in all such cases, bjr mere will and pleasure, without a reason ; which were an ima- gination altogether unworthy the Supreme wisdom; but that there are reasons of mighty force and weight, or cer- tain congruities, in the natures of things themselves, obvi- ous to the Divine understanding, which do either wholly escape ours, or whereof we have but very shallow, dark, conjectural apprehensions ; as he that saw men as trees, or as some creatures, of very acute sight, perceive what to us seems invisible. And yet those occult and hidden reasons and congruities have been the foundation of con- stitutions and laws, that hold things more steadily than adamantine bands ; and are of more stability than the foundations of heaven and earth. Chap. VI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 87 Furthermore it is to be considered, that the rights of the Divine government, the quality and measure of offences committed against it, and when or upon what terms they may be remitted, or in what case, it may be congruous to the dignity of that government to recede from such rights ; are matters of so high a nature, that it becomes us to be very sparing in making an estimate about them ; especially a more diminishing one than the general strain of Scrip- ture seems to hold forth. Even among men, how sacred things are majesty, and the rights of government! And how much above the reach of a vulgar judgment ! Suppose a company of peasants, that understand little more than what is within the compass of their mattock, plough, and shovel, should take upon them to judge of the rights of their prince, and make an estimate of the measure of offences, committed against the majesty and dignity of government ; how competent judges would we think them "? And will we not acknowledge the most refined human understanding as incompetent to judge of the rights of the Divine government, or measure the injuriousness of an offence done against it ; as the meanest peasant to make an estimate of these matters, in a human government 1 If only the reputation be wronged of a person of better quality, how strictly is it insisted on to have the matter tried by peers, or persons of equal rank ! such as are ca- pable of understanding honour and reputation ! How would it be resented, if an affront, put upon a nobleman, should be committed to the judgment of smiths, and cob- blers ; especially if they were participes criminis, and as well parties, as judges'? When the regalia of the great Ruler and Lord of heaven and earth are invaded, his temple violated, his presence despised, his image torn down thence and defaced ; who among the sons of men are either great, or knowing, or innocent enough to judge of the offence and wrong 7 or how fit it is that it be remitted, without recompense 1 or what recompense would be proportionable 1 How sup- posable is it, that there may be congruities in this matter, obvious to the Divine understanding, which infinitely ex- ceed the measure of ours 1 III. And yet, because God speaks to us about these matters, and they are our own concernments, as being of the offending parties ; it is necessary we apply our minds to understand them, and possible to us to attain to a true, though not to a full, understanding of them. And though we can never fully comprehend in our own thoughts the horror of the case, that reasonable creatures, made after God's image, so highly favoured by him, capable of blessedness in him, incapable of it any other way, should have arrived to that pitch of wickedness towards him, and unnaturalness towards themselves, as to say to him, Depart from us, and cut themselves off from him : though we may sooner lose ourselves in the contemplation, and be overwhelmed by our own thoughts, than ever see through the monstrous evil of this defection: yet we may soon see it incomparably to transcend the measure of any offence, that can ever be done by one creature against another ; or of the most scandalous affront the meanest, the vilest, the most ungrateful, ill-natured wretch could have devised to put upon the greatest, the most benign, and best deserving prince the world ever knew. And if we can suppose an offence, of that kind, may be of so heinous a nature, and so circumstanced as that it cannot be congruous it should be remitted, without some repara- tion made to the majesty of the prince, and compensation for the scandal done to government; it is easy to sup- pose it much more incongruous it should be so in the present case. Yea, and as it can never be thought congruous, that such an offence, against any human governor, should be pardoned without the intervening repentance of the delin- quent ; so we may easily apprehend also the case to be such, as that it cannot be fit it should be pardoned upon that alone, without other recompense. Whereof if any should doubt, I would demand, is it in any case fit that a penitent delinquent, against human laws and government, should be punished, or a proportionable recompense be exacted for his offence, notwithstanding! Surely it will be acknowledged ordinarily fit, and who would take upon him to be the censor of the common justice of the worla, in all such cases 1 or to damn the proceedings of all times, and nations, wheresoever a penitent offender hath been made to suffer the legal punishment of his offences, not- withstanding his repentance 1 How strange a maxim of government would that be : that it is never fit an offender, of what.soever kind, should be punished, if he repent him- self of his offence ! And surely if ever, in anv case, some- what else than repentance be fitly insisted on", as a recom- pense for the violation of the sacred rights of government ; it may well be supposed to be so, in the case of man's common delinquency and revolt from God, much more. Unto which purpose it is further to be considered, that in this case the matter is much otherwise between God and man, than, for the most part, between a secular prince and a delinquent subject : that is, that pardon, be it never so plenary, doth (as pardon) no more than restore the de- linquent into as good a condition as he was in before. But what was, for the most part, the ca.se before of delinquent subjects "? There are very few that were before the prince's favourites, his intimate associates and friends, with whom he was wont familiarly to converse. Very often the con- dition of the offender was such before, that his pardon only saves him from the gallows ; lets him live, and enjoy only the poor advantages of his former mean condition ; and not always that neither : yea, or if he were one whose higher rank and other circumstances had entitled him to a nearest attendance on the person of the prince, and a daily, inward conversation with him ; it is possible he might be pardoned with limitation as to his life, or it may be, fur- ther, to his estate, without being restored to the honours and offices about the person of the prince, which he held only by royal favour: for though princely compassion might extend so far as to let his offence be expiated by less than his utter ruin, yet also his prudent respect to the dig- nity of his government might not admit that a person under public infamy should have the liberty of his pre- sence, intermingle with his councils, or be dignified with more special marks of his favour and kindness. Whereas in the restitution of man, inasmuch as before he wa,s the temple and residence of the great King, where he afforded his most inward, gracious presence, the design is to restore him into the same capacity, and to as good condition as he was in before in these respects: yea, and not only so, but unspeakably to better his case, to take him much nearer to himself than ever, and into a more exalted state. In order whereto, it was the more highly congruous that his offence be done away by a most perfect, unexception- able expiation; that so high and great an advancement of the most heinous offenders, might not be brought about upon other terms than should well accord with the ma- jesty of his government over the world. IV. Here, therefore, let a comparative view be taken of the fearful malediction and curse of God's law upon the transgressors of it, and of the copious blessing of the gos- pel : that thereupon we may the more clearly judge how improbable it was there should be so vast a difference and translation between two so distant states, without atone- ment made for transgression of so high demerit, Emd so deeply resented. 1. As to the former, we are in the general told, (Gal. iii.) that "cursed is everyone that continues not in all things written in the book of the law, to do them." As- tonishing thing ! That he should curse me who made me! That my being, and a curse upon me, should proceed from the word and breath of the same sacred mouth ! Of how terrible import is his curse ! To be made an anathema, separate and cut off from God, and from all the dutiful and loyal part of his creation ! Driven forth from his deliffhtful presence ! In the same breath, it is said to the loathed wretch. Depart— accursed ! To be re- duced to the condition of a vagabond on the earth, not knowing whither to go ! Naked of Divine protection from any violent hand; yea, marked out for the butt of the sharpest arrows of his own indignation ! How voluminous and extensive is his curse ! reaching to all one's concern- ments in both worlds, temporal and eternal, of outward and inward man. To be cursed in one's basket and store, in the citv and field, in going out and coming in ! Espe- ciallv to have all God's"curs"es and plagues meeting and centring in one's very heart, to be there smitten with THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. blindness, madness, and astonishment ! How efficacious is this curse ! Not a faint, impotent wishing ill to a man, but under which he really wastes, and which certainly blasts, withers, and consumes him, and even turns his very blessings into curses ! How closely adhering, as a gar- ment wherewith he is clothed, and as a girdle with which he is girt continually ! How secretly and subtly insinuat- ing, as water into his bowels, and oil into his bones ! And how deservedly doth it befall 1 The curse causeless shall not come ; this can never be without a cause. If another curse me, it shows he hates me ; if the righteous God do so, it signifies me to be in myself a hateful creature, a son and heir, not of peace, but of wrath and a curse. And the effect must be of equal permanency with its cause ; so as that God is angry with the wicked every day, and rains upon them fire and brimstone, and a horrible tempest, as the portion of their cup ; indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that does evil, and continually growing into a treasure, against the da)^ of wrath. 2. View, on the other hand, the copious, abundant blessing contained and conveyed in the gospel. It is a call to blessing, that we may inherit a blessing: it dis- covers a state begun with the blessedness of having ini- qiiity forgiven ; a course, under a continued blessing, of meditating on the word of God with delight, day and night ; of being undefiled in the way : gives characters of the subjects of blessings showered down from the mouth of Christ on the poor in spirit, pure in heart, the meek, mer- ciful, &c. : aims at making them nigh, that were afar off; taking them into God's own family and household ; making them friends, favourites, domestics, sons, and daughters ; engaging them in a fellowship with the Father and Son : yet were all these the children of wrath, by nature. Whence is this change? A regression became not the majesty of heaven. God's original constitution, that connected sin and the curse, was just; he abides by it, reverses it not. To have reversed it, was not to have judged the offenders, but himself; but having a mind to show men mercy, he provides for the expiation of sin, and salving the rights of his government, another.way — by transferring guilt and the curse, not nutting them. V. Whereupon, we may also see what made atonement for sin so fundamental to a design of grace ; the magnifying the divine law; (Isa. xlii. 41.) the asserting the equity and righteousness of the supreme government ; not, as some odiously suggest, the gratifying of what, with us, is wont to go for a private appetite of revenge, from which the support of the honour and the dignity of the govern- ment is most remote : yea, it were horrid to suppose that any such thing can have place with the blessed God, which is one of the most odious things in the disposition of lapsed, degenerate man — an aptness to take complacency in the pains and anguish of such as have offended us; unto which purpose, how feelingly v/ould a malicious, ill- minded man, oftentimes utter the sense of his heart, and say, O the sweetness of revenge ! So black a thought of God will be most remote from every pious breast, or that is capable of savouring real goodness. Nor doth any pre- cept within the whole compass of that revelation which he hath given us, express more fully, at once, both our duty and his own nature, than that of loving our enemies, or of forgiving men their trespasses. There is, perhaps, some- where (but O how rarely ?) to be found among men, that benign, generous temper of mind, as when an enemy is per- fectly within one's power, to be able to take a real solace in showing mercy; when he is in a fearful, trembling ex- pectation, and hath even yielded himself a prey to revenge, to take pleasure in surprising him by acts of kindness and compassion : one that can avow the contrary sentiment to the spirit of the world, and to them who so emphatically say. How sweet is revenge ! and can with greater -rraBoi oppose to it that, as the undisguised sense of his soul, O but how much sweeter is it to forgive ! Than this, there is no where to be seen a more lively resemblance of God ; a truer and more real part of His living image, who hath commanded us to love our enemies ; if they hunger, to feed them ; to bless them that curse us ; to pray for them that despitefuUy use us, and persecute us ; that we may ne his childr^en, tjiat we may show ourselves born of him, and to have received from him a new, even a divine, na- ture, one truly agreeable to and resembling his own ; and unto him, the acts and operations that naturally proceed from this temper of spirit, are more grateful and savoury than all whole burnt-ofi'erings and sacrifices. So are we to frame our conceptions of the ever blessed God, if either we will take the rationally coherent and self-consistent idea of an absolutely perfect Being, or his own frequent affirmations who best understands his own nature, or the course of his actual dispensations towards a sinful world, for our measure of him. VI. But is it a difficulty to us to reconcile with all this such frequent expressions in the sacred volume, as import a steady purpose that all the sins of men shall be answered with an exactly proportionable measure of punishment 1 That every transgression shall have a just recompense of reward 1 That death is the stated wages of sin ! Or do we find ourselves more perplexed how to understand, con- sistently with such declarations of his merciful nature, those passages which sometimes also occur, that seem to intimate a complacential vindictiveness, and delight taken in punishing — the Lord is "jealous, the Lord revengeth :" yea, he seems to appropriate it as peculiar to himself — "Vengeance is mine, and I will repay it:" "indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish, shall be upon every soul of man that doth evil." We meet with passages that speak of his laying up sin, sealing it among his treasures ; of his waiting for a day of recompenses ; of his whetting his glittering sword, his making his bow ready, and pre- paring his arrows on the string ; of his being refreshed by acts of vengeance, his satiating of his fury, and causing it hereupon to rest, as having highly pleased and satisfied himself therewith. If any thing alien to the Divine nature, and disagreeable Vo the other so amiable discoveries of it, be thought imported in such expressions, let it only be considered, first, what must be allowed to be their import; and next, how well so much will agree with a right con- ception of God. For the former, it is not necessary that such expressions be understood to intend more, and it seems necessary they be not understood to import less, than a constant, calm, dispassionate, complacential will, so far to punish sin, as shall be necessary to the ends of his government. That they do import a will to punish, is evident ; for they are manifest expression of anger, whereof we can say nothing more gentle, than that it is a will to punish. It cannot signify punishment, without that will ; for though the word anger, or wrath, be sometimes used in Scripture for the punishment itself, yet even then that will is supposed; otherwise what is said to be punishment, were an unin- tended accident; and then how were it a punishment'? Much less can it signify only God's declaration of his will to punish, excluding that will itself; for then what is it a declaration of? Or what doth it declare ? Surely we will acknowledge it a true declaration ; then it cannot be the declaration of nothing, but must have somewhat in God correspondent to it ; viz. the will which it declares. Which being plain, that it be also a dispassionate will, accom- panied with nothing of perturbation ; that it be a constant will, in reference to all such occasions, wherein the sacred- ness of the divine government, violated, requires sueh reparation ; and without any change, (other than what we may conceive imported in the different aspects of the same object, conceived as future, present, or past, and beheld be- fore, with purpose, afterwards with continual approbation,) the most acknowledged perfection on the divine nature doth manifestly not admit only, but require. For that such a calm, sedate, steady, fixed temper of mind in a magistrate is an excellency, even common reason apprehends: there- fore is it said, by a noted pagan, that judges ought to be teguvi similes — like the Mies themselves ; which are moved by no passion, yet inflexible : and then where can such an excellency have place in highest perfection, but in the blessed God himself? Yea, and that it be also a conipla.- cential will, as some of the expressions above recited seem to import, may very well be admitted, if we right *■• con- ceive and state in our own minds the thing willed by it ; i. e. the preserving the honour and dignity of the supreme government. Indeed, simply to take pleasure in the pain and misery of another, is so odd and unnatural a disaffec- tion, that it is strange how it can have place any where ;, Chap. VII. THE LIVING TEMPLE. and where it seems to have place among men, though too often it really hath so in more monstrou.sly vicious tem- pers, yet, with many others, (who herein are sufficiently blameable also,) the matter may, perhaps, be somewhat mistaken ; pleasure may possibly not be taken in the af- flicted person's mere suffering, for itself, but only a-s it is an argument or evidence of the other's superiority, wherein he prides himself, especially if he before misdoubted his own power, and that there'hath been a dispute about it, which is now only thus decided. In this case a secret joy may arise unto the prevailing party, upon his being delivered from an afflicting fear of being so used himself; and whereas he took it for a disparagement that the other did so far lessen and diminish him in his own thoughts, as to suppose or hope he should prove the stronger ; a pleasure is now taken in letting him feel and have so sensible a demonstration of his error. VII. But that wherewith we must suppose the blessed God to be pleased, in the matter of punishing, is the con- gruity of the thing itself, that the sacred rights of his go- vernment over the world be vindicated; and that it be understood how ill his nature can comport with any thing that is impure : and what is in itself so highly congruous, cannot but be the matter of his delectation. He takes eternal pleasure in the reasonableness and fitness of his own determinations and actions, and rejoices in the works of his own hands, as agreeing with the apt, eternal schemes and models which he hath conceived in his most wise and all-comprehending mind : so that though he desireth not the death of sinners, and hath no delight in the sufferings of his afflicted creatures, which his immense goodness rather inclines him to behold with compassion, yet the true ends of punishment are so much a greater good than their ease, and exemption from the suffering they had de- served, that they must rather be chosen, and cannot be eli- gible for any reason, but for which also they are to be delighted in ; i. e. a real goodness, and conducibleness to a valuable end, inherent in them. Upon which account, the iust execution of the Divine pleasure in the punishment of insolent offenders is sometimes spoken of under the notion of a solemn festival, a season of joy, yea even of a sacrifice, as having a fragrancy or delectable savour in it. But whereas some of the above-mentioned expressions do seem to intimate a delight in satisfying a furious, vindictive ap- petite; we are to consider, that what is spoken for the warning and terror of stupid besotted men, was necessaril}' to be spoken with some accommodation to their dull ap- prehension of the things which they yet see and feel not. For which purpose the person is put on, sometimes, of an enraged, mighty man ; the terror of which representation is more apprehensible to vulgar minds, than the calm, de- .iberate proceedings of magistratical justice ; it being man}' imes more requisite, that expressions be rather suited to vhe person spoken to, though they somewhat less exactly square with the thing itself intended to be spoken. VIII. Wherefore this being all that we have any reason to understand imported in such texts of Scripture as we before mentioned, viz. a calm and constant will of preserv- ing the divine government from contempt, by a due punish- ment of such as do offer injurious affronts to it ; and that takes pleasure in itself, or is satisfied with the congruiiy and fitness of its o\vn determination ; what can there be in this unworthy of God? what that disagrees with his other perfections'? or that the notion of a Being, every way perfect, doth not exact and claim as necessarily belonging to it 1 For to cut off this from it, were certainly a veiy great maim to the notion of such a Being, if we consider it as invested with the right and office of supreme rector, or ruler of the world. For if you frame such an idea of a prince as should exclude a disposition to pimish offenders, who would not presently observe in it an intolerable defect 1 Suppose Xenophon to have given this character of his Cyrus — That he was a person of so sweet a nature, that he permitted every one to do what was good in his own eyes; if any one put indignities upon him, he took no offence at it ; he dispensed favours alike to all ; even they that despised his authority, invaded his rights, attempted the subversion of his government, with the disturbance and confusion cf all that lived under it, had equal countenance and kindness from him, as they that were most observant I of his laws, and faithful to his interest; and it were as safe for any one to be his sworn enemy, as his mo.st loyal and devoted subject: — who would take this for a com- mendation, or think such a one fit to have s"wayed a scep- tre? Can there be no such thing as goodness, without the exclusion and banishment of wisdom, righteousness, and truth 1 Yea, it is plain they not only CMisist with it, but that it is a manifest inconsistency it should be without them. The several virtues of a well-instructed mind, as they all concur to make up one entire frame, so they do each of them cast a mutual lustre upon one another ; much more is it so with the several excellences of the Divine Being. But how much too low are our highest and mo.st raised thoughts of the Supreme Majesty! How do we falter when we most earnestly .strive to .speak and think most worthily of God, and suitably to his excellenl greatness! CHAPTER VIL The notion of justice in the divine government, and in a human, not altogether the same. A thing said to brt just, in a negative and a positive sense. Tho question discussed, Whettier God's will to puni.sh sin wtre. antecedently to his legal constitution to that purpose, just, not only in the former sense, but in the latter also? Volenti non /it injuria, as to man needs limitation. Holy .Scripture speaks of God's punishing sin, not merely as a concomitant of justice, but an clfect. His will to punish it must proceed from justice ; not. primarily, according to the common notion of justice, as it resjiects llie rights of another ; therefore another notion of it (as to him) to be sought. Gai'M rights so unalienable, that he cannot quit them to his own wroiig a.s rrtan can. .Secondarily, according to the other notion, his right to puiMsh depends not on his legal constitution, but that on it. That he cannot altogether quit it. no detraction from him. Justice, in a larger notion, do'h further oblige to insist upon recompense ; viz. universal justice, as especially it comprehends his holiness, his wisdom. The fitness of God's methods herein not to be only contemplated by men, but angels. In what sense punishmentji to be reckoucd debts. This matter summed up. I. We must also acknowledge a very vast difference be- tween God's government over his intelligent creatures, and that of a secular prince over his subjects ; and are there- upon to inquire, whether the notion of justice, as it is ap- plied to the one government and the other, can be the same. A secular ruler is set up and established pui-posely for the good of the community, as the more principal end of his constitution. The people are not formed for him, but he for them ; whence the administration of justice is a public and common right, wherewith he is intrusted by the Supreme Ruler for them, in order to the common good. Well, therefore, may his decrees and edicts go in this form, and have this for their chief scope and end : Nc quid de- trivienti respnblica capiat. And hence the neglect duly and seasonably to animadvert upon offenders, is a violation of the public justice committed to his management, for which he is accountable to him that intrusted him: it is a wrong done to the community, of whose rights he is the appointed guardian. And whereas such oflences as more directly strike at his crown, and disnit}', as treason or re- bellion, seem more principally levelled against himself and his own rights, so is the legal punishment of them to be more at his arbitrement, whether to inflict or not inflict it; because it maj- seem in any one's power to dispense with or recede from his own rights. Yet indeed if the matter be more narrowly scanned, the relaxation of these should be, in reason, less in his power than of any other ; because they more directly affront that Supreme Ruler whom he represents, and threaten the dissolution of the government, which is the principal civil good of the whole commtmity, and the benefits whereof are their highest right. If vio- lence be done to a private subject, the impunity of the oflender would be a public wrong; because it remotely tends, by the badness of the example, to the hurt of the whole community. But in this case, without any such circulation, all the rights of the community are immedi- ately struck at together, in their central knot and juncture; wherefore here, most of all, the prince is debtor to the com- munity. But now, the great Lord and Ruler of the world owes his own creatures nothing : he is, by his goodness, inclined to take care of them, and preserve common order among them ; but not owing them any thing, (except by his own word he makes himself a debtor,) he cannot be said to 90 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. ■wrong the community, by not providing that punishments be inflicted upon delinquents, according to demerit. What he can be understood, originally, to owe herein, he owes only to himself; whence also the notion of justice which we herein attribute to him, seems very different from that which belongs to human governments ; which, though it allows not the disposal of another's right, to his prejudice, forbids not the remitting of one's own. II. Whereas, therefore, a thing may be said just, in a two-fold sense; either negative, as it is that which justice does not disapprove, or positive, as that whereto also jus- tice doth oblige: it is hereupon a question of great moment. Whether God's will to punish sinners, antecedent to his legal constitution to that purpose, were just in the former sense only, or also in the latter 1 Can we say, God had been unjust, in not so determining 1 Whose rights had he violated in willing otherwise 1 Not man's, to whom he did owe nothing. Will we say. His ownl But volenti nan fit injuria — which maxim doth not set us at liberty absolutely to do whatsoever we will with ourselves, and what is ours ; because of others, whose rights are compli- cated with ours, the chief Ruler and Lord of all especially, who hath principal interest in us, and all that we have. Yet it holds even as to us: for though we may mjure others, God especially, by an undue disposition of our properties, which he intrusts us with ; (not for ourselves only, but for himself chiefly, and for other men, whom therefore, in the second place, we may wrong, by disabling ourselves to do them that good which we ought;) and though we may also prejudice ourselves, yet, "ourselves apart, we cannot be said so far to wrong, by our own con- sent, as to be able to resume our right ; because, by that consent, (supposing it imprudent, or any way undue,) we have quilted and even forfeited the right, which, for our- selves, we had. But as to God, who has no superior, nor owes any thing to any one, whom can he be thought to wrong, by departing from any of his own rights 1 Inasmuch therefore as justice, in the common and most general notion of it, is ever wont to be reckoned conversant about d\\6Tpuiv dyiiGov — tJie good of others, even that whereto they have a right ; it seems not intelligible, how justice, according to this usual notion of it, could primarily oblige God to inflict deserved punishment upon transgressors, if he had not settled a legal constitution to this purpose, and declared that should be the measure of his proceedings herein; both because it is so little conceivable how the punishments of the other state (which we are chiefly to con- sider) can be a good to them who do not suffer them, (as we are sure they can be none to them that do,) and also that it is not to be understood how, if they were, they could otherwise have any right thereto, than by that con- stitution by which (as, before, God's dominion was that of an absolute, sovereign Lord) he now undertakes the part of a governor, ruling according to known and estab- lished laws. III. Yet very plain it is, that for the actual infliction of such punishments, holy Scripture speaks of it not merely as a concomitant of justice, or as that which may consis't with it, but as an eftect; which the nvTaTT6ioaii, mentioned by the apostle, plainly signifies, (-2 Thess. i. 9.) when he tells us it is with God a righteous thing, — iUaiov (that must be not only what justice doth admit, but exact,) to recom- ve7ise — ivraTTo^Svai, tribulation to the troublers of his people, &c. And Avhen we are told, (Rom. ii. 6.) that God will reyyder (or recompense — a-aoiii^a) to every one according to his works, even in the day above mentioned, {v. 5.) which is called, ^^itpu i^yfti, koi d-roKa'Xiipcms iiKaioKpiaiai, — the day of wrath, and of the revelation of the righteous judg- ment of God; and that 'tis said, the world was to become vv6SLKni — guilty, (we read,) liable to be impleaded before God, Rom. iii. 19. And again, {ch. xii. 19.) that iKiiKvan —vengeance is said to belong to him, and he will repay; with many more passages of the like import. But to carry the matter higher : it being evident it is that which justice doth require, to punish sin, according to such a constitution once made; vet all this while, how the constitution was any necessary effect of justice, appears not. Nor are we helped by the common notion of justice herein, and are therefore cast upon the inquiry. Whether any other notion of justice be fitly assignable, according whereto it may be understood to have required the making that constitution itself 1 IV. It is here to be considered, whence, or from what fountain, any man, or community of men, come to have right to any thing. It cannot be, but that the Fountain of all being must be the Fountain of all rights. From whence things, absolutely considered, descend, all the relations that result must also descend. There can there- fore be no pretence of right to any thing, among creatures, but from God ; He, as the sovereign Proprietor and Lord of all, settles such and such rights in creatures, which they hold and retain dependenlly on him, upon terms and ac- cording to rules which he hath prescribed ; so as that by transgression men may forfeit such rights, or by consent and mutual contracts transfer them to one another. Where- upon they have no unalienable rights, none whereof they may not be divested, either by their default or consent: sometimes by both together, as by a faulty consent. And indeed if it be by the former, it must be by the latter ; be- cause no man is supposed to commit a fault against his will. But it may be by the latter without the former, as none can doubt but one may innocently divest himself, in many cases, of his own present right; otherwise, there could be no such thing in the world as either gift or sale. And hence it comes to pass, that the justice which is in- herent in any man, comes to be conversant about the rights of another, not his own ; so far as to oblige him not to in- trench upon the rights of another, while yet it forbids him not to dispose of his own, as they are merely his. And there is no such thing as justice towards a man's self, so inhibiting him, as (though perhaps such an act ought not to have been done) to make his act in that kind invalid, when he hath done it, only because he hath thereby wronged himself; or which he can, afterwards, allege against his own act or deed. For he hath no other rights in any thing, than what are derived, borrowed, dependent on the Supreme Proprietor, mea,surable by his rules, by which they are not unalienable ; yea, justice obliges, if he swear to his own hurt, not to change, Ps. xv. V. But now, with the Supreme Proprietor, there cannot but be unalienable rights, inseparably and everlastingly inherent in him: for it cannot be, but that He that is the Fountain of all rights, must have them primarily and originally in himself; and can no more so quit them, as to make the creature absolute and independent, than he can make the creature God. Wherefore, though with man there can be no such thing as justice towards one's self, disenabling him to forego his own rights, the case cannot but be quite otherwise as to God, and for the same reason for which it cannot agree to man ; because man hath none but borrowed and alienable rights, which he can forego to his own prejudice, and God hath none that he can so part with. Hereupon, therefore, God did owe it to him- self, primarily, as the absolute Sovereign and Lord of all, not to suffer indignities to be offered to him, without animadverting upon them, and therefore to determine he would do so. VI. But withal, he having undertaken the part of a legal Governor, and to rule by established laws, which should be the stated measures of sin and duty, of punishments and rewards ; hereby common order was to be preserved in the governed community: and having published his constitution in his word, and otherwise sufficiently to thaK purpose, he hath hereby, secondarily, made himself DebtOi to the community, and by his constitution given men some right to the benefit of that order which was to be maintained among them by these means: which benefit they do here, in this present state, actually partake in some measure ; and might in a greater measure, if they were more governable, or would regard and be awed more by the laws (with their sanctions) of their great and rightful Ruler and Lord. Wherefore, though men have no benefit by the punishments of the future state, they have, or might have, by the feared commination of them, which, neglected, made the actual infliction of them necessary. Nor had they only the probable benefit of present order hereb}', but of a future well-being ; it bemg the design of that, as of all the comminations of wise and good rulers, to prevei-t the desert of the threatened punishment, and consequently the punishment itself. And though men could have no right Chap. VII. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 91 to any such benefit, before the constitution ; yet it is not inconceivable, that by it they might have some; viz. an inferior and secondary right. VII. Wherefore the blessed God, by making the legal constitution, that he will have stand as the measure of his government, hath not added to his own right to govern and punish as there is cause ; for it was natural, and needed nothing to support it. The constitution rather limits than causes his right, which depends not on it, but gives rise to it rather. He gives assurance, by it, of his equal deal- ing, and that he will not lay upon man more than is riglit, that he should enter into judgment with God, Job xxxiv. 12, 23. And whereas he hath been pleased to publish his constitution, in the form of a covenant, variously attem- pered to the different states of men, nothing accrues to him by their stipulating with him thereupon. He is their Governor, as he is their Maker; not at their choice, which in propriety thecase admits not, there being no competitor that pretends against him; but is only a loyal, dutiful consent, or recognising his former right. They that con- sent to it, do therefore more deeply oblige themselves to their own duty, and entitle themselves to his covenanted favours ; but can entitle him to nothing, for their all was his before : his contract shows his condescension, not de- fective title. And this his antecedent, original right, that peculiar excellency of his nature, his justice to himself in- violably preserves, as the faithful guardian of all his sacred rights. So that when he undertakes the part of a legal Governor, it indispensably necessitates his doing whatso- ever is requisite for supporting the honour and dignity of his government ; and can permit nothing that shall detract from it, or render it less august and awfuL Yet need we not here over scrupulously defend the common notion of justice, in the utmost strictness of it, that makes it conversant only about another's right, and seems therefore to imply that a man can owe nothing to himself That love to others, which comprehends all our duty to them, is to be measured by love to ourselves, which seems equally comprehensive of duty which we are supposed to owe to ourselves. Nor shall we dispute whether in no sense one can be both creditor and debtor; or whether insobriety be not properly unrighteousness, and sobriety justice, even towards oneself; subordination to God being still preserved, under whom, and for whom, only we can owe any thing to ourselves or others. Only supposing, among men, such a thing as self-justice, it is with them a weaker and more debile principle, that may betray and lose their rights, which then no justice can reclaim. Whereas, with God, it is, as all other excellen- cies are, in highest perfection, and hath always the force with him of an eternal and immutable law. VIII. And if any should imagine this to detract from the absoluteness of God's dominion and sovereignty, and set him in this respect beneath his own creatures, that whereas tkey can quit their rights, it should be supposed he cannot forego his; 'tis answered. It hath not been said, that God can forego none of his own rights; it is plain he doth when having the right to punish a sinner, he by pardon confers upon him right to impunity : but he cannot do it to the prejudice and dishonour of his glorious excellences, and the dignity of his government. And therefore, if some preparation were requisite to his doing it, consistently with the due honour and reputation thereof, justice towards himself required he should insist upon it ; which is no more a detraction from his absoluteness, than that he cannot lie, or do any thing unworthy of himself. He is f;o eibsoluf-c, that he can do whatever he pleases; but so jvst, that he cannot be pleased to do an unrighteous thing. IX. But besides that stricter notion of God's justice, as k is conversant about, and conservative of, his own rights ; we may also consider it in a larger and more comprehen- sive notion, as it includes his several moral attributes and excellences, and answers to that which among men is called universal justice, and reckoned to contain in it all virtues.* For so taken, it comprehends his holiness, and perfect detestation of all impurity, in respect whereof he cannot be perpetually inclined to animadvert with severity upon sin ; both because of its irreconcilable contrariety A 'Ev 6eiucaioavvm ffvXXij/J^ijv irof a/ier' ff'. to his holy nature, and the insolent affront which it there- lore directly oilers him ; and because of the implicit, most injurious misrepresentation of him, which it contains in it, as if he were either kindly or more indifferently affected towards it: upon which accounts, we may well suppose him to esteem it necessary for him, both to constitute a rule for punishing it, and to punish it accordingly ; that he may both truly act his own nature, and truly represc/ii it. X. And again, if we take the notion of his justice ia this latitude, it will comprehend his governing vnsdom; the part of which attribute it is, to determine and direct the doing whatsoever is fit to be determined and done ; as it is the part of his righteousness (taken in the strictest sense) to resolve upon and execute whatever the rules of justice do require and call for. 'Tis the judge of decencies, or what is meet and becoming him, a-s the Lord and Ruler of the world, to do or not do. And a very reasonable account might be given of this matter, that we may renew and somewhat further insist on what was said above, chap. vL s. 5, &c. There are many just laws made by hunran le- gislators, to the making whereof, though justice (in the strictest sense) did not rigidly oblige them, so that they had been unjust if they had not made them, yet this other principle, of equal importance to government, and which also doth not altogether refuse the name of justice, might require the making them, and would not be well comport- ed with by omitting to make them. Hereupon therefore if it should be inquired. Was it, antecedently to the making of this constitution, an indif- ferent thing with God, whether to determine sin should be punished, or not 1 I answer, even upon this ground. No; it was not indifferent, but most indispensably necessary. Any thing is with him necessary, as he is the Supreme Governor, that is upon a prudential account most fit and conducible to the ends of government An antecedent necessity we might therefore assert, such as not only arises from his justice, most strictly taken, but his wisdom also; whose part it is to judge of congruities, as it is the part of strict justice to determine matters of right. Nor is it unfit to say, Wisdom is the chief principle exercised in making laws, justice in governing according to laws already made. I say, the chief; for justice hath that part in legislation too, which hath been assigned it, as wisdom hath also its part in the consequent administration. And what can be more necessary to the great God, than to do ever what is most becoming and worthy of himself? And what could have been so becoming of him, as to let it appear to the world how sacred the rights of his empire over ii are 1 how horrid a thing the defection of a reasonable creature is. from the great Author and Lord of its life and being? how costly an expiation it did require 1 how solemn rights were to be performed 1 how great and awful transactions, that sin might become pardonable 1 What could so tend to exalt majesty, to magnify the reputation of his govern- ment, to possess his reasonable creatures with awful ap- prehensions, and make them dread to offend 1 In a pru- dent government, how great a thing is reason of state ! Even where there is the greatest inclination imaginable to be in all things most strictly and unexceptionably just, yet is that the only care with prudent governors, that they mavbe able to approve the justice of their administrations 1 There are manv things which, without transgressing par- ticular rules of justice, misht have been omitted, from which vet, upon mere reason of state, you can no more make them swerve one ace, than you can remove the earth from its centre, or change the ordinances of day and nieht : and whereas that hath place in all things that tend to the keeping up the reputation and grandeur of govemment, where can it claim to have place with equal right asliere 1 Whereupon we mav, with greatest assurance, assert, that in thingswhichhave this reference, 'tis equally impossible to the absolute perfection of the divine nature, that God should do an inept or unfit thing, as an unjust. And whereas his righteousness is the directive principle, in respect of equity or iniquity ; so is his wisdom, of congruity and incongruitV, decencv and indecency; and that 'tis^ equally necessary to hini to do what is most worthy ol 93 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. himself, and most becomins; his excellent greatness, as what is most strictly just. Therefore that when his most transcendant greatness is represented m terms as high and great as could come under human conception, (Heb. li. 10.) He, viz. for whom arc all things, and by whom are all ihi'ngs ; (and what could sound higher'?) As such it is considered what was most becoming of him ; and deter- mined that it became Him, for and by whom all things were, since there was one (though so great a one) that had j undertaken for sinners, to be the Prince or Prefect t over the great affair of their salvation, especially being to make | them, of rebels, sons, and as such, bring them to glory, | .out of the meanest and most abject state ; that he should .not be made perfect, (not be duly initiated into his great ■office, or not be complete master of his design,) otherwise than by his own intervening suffering. Meaner persons might do as became their meaner condition ; but He, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, must do as best became the most glorious greatness of Him, who is the First and the Last, the Author and End of all things ■? ^ XI. We are prone to confine our apprehensions of things to our own narrow sphere, that have reference also to another besides, and greater than ours. If God had no creatures but man, capable of government by laws, the case had been much other than it is ; for considering that men have all been in one common case of apostacy and condemnation, they who should be restored to favour and a happy state, should have no reason to look strangely upon one another, whatsoever the way and terms were of their restitution, being all dealt with alike. But we are to de- sign a larger field and scene for our thoughts, and to con- sider, that besides men, that shall be restored from a fallen and lapsed state, there are numberless myriads of pure and loyal spirits, that never fell, and with whom restored men are to make one entire, happy community, for ever. Now we are to consider what aspect the matter would have in their eyes, if not a single person, or two, but so vast a multitude, (and not guilty of some light, transient offence only, but of insolent, malicious enmity and rebellion against the divine government, propagated and transmitted from age to age, through all the successions of time,) should be brought in upon them, to partake in the dignities and blessedness of their state, without any reparation made of so great and continuing an injury ! Though their perfect subjection in all things to the good pleasure of God would not allow them to be exceptions, and apt to censure his doings or determinations, yet also his most perfect wisdom and exact judgment, and knov/ledge of what is in itself most fit, could much less admit he should do any thing liable to be censured by his creatures, as less fit. And no doubt so large and capacious intellects may well be sup- posed to penetrate far into the reason and wisdom of his dispensations; and so not only to exercise submission, in an implicit acquiescence in the unseen and only believed fitness of them, but also to take an inexpressible compla- cency and satisfaction in what they manifestly discern thereof, and 'o be able to resolve their delectation in the ways and works of God into a higlier cause and reason than the mere general belief that he doth all things well ; viz. their immediate, delightful viewof tlie congruity and fitness of what he does. When they behold the apostacy and revolt of the sons of men expiated not by one of them- selves, but with whom the Divine Nature, in his own Son, was so intimately united, that the atonement made was both fit, as from them, and adequate, as to him : this they cannot but behold with complacential approbation and admiration ; for, no doubt, he made creatures of such a capacity, with a design to gratify the understandings he gave them, by approving and recommending the exactness and accuracy of his methods thereto ; otherwise, a far lower measure of intellectual ability, in these creatures, had answered the Creator's purpose as well. They cer- tainly cannot but approve that way lie hath taken, for itself; and do doubtless stoop down to look into it, not with less complacency than wonder; it being, in the congruity of it, as suitable to their bright and clear intellects, being revealed, as for the strange contrivance thereof it had been b apxnyoi'. altogether above them, if it had not been revealed. They cannot, Avhen they behold a full, glorious vindication of the offence and wrong done to their common Lord, and the dignity of his government, by his revolted creatures antecedent to the reception of any of them into grace and favour, but highly admire the lovely comeliness and con- gruity of this whole di.spensation, and express their plea- sant resentments, by bearing a part with the redeemed society in such strains of praise, such admirations and ap- plauses, as these : " Holy and marvellous are thy works, LordGod Almighty ; just and true are thy judgments, thou King of nations and of saints!" XII. Upon the whole, there appears sufficient reason to conclude, not only upon the account of justice more strictly taken, but also of congruity and fitness, or according to such a larger notion of justice as imports an inflexible propension to do what is fit and congruous to be done, it was indispensably necessary the holy God should, in order to his return to his temple among men, insist to have a recompense made for the wrong that was done him by the violation of it. Nor let this be understood to detract from, but add to, what hath been above discoursed of justice, taken in a mo.st strict sense, and most appropriate to God, as it is, primarily and in the first place, conservative of his own most sacred rights; which must be, by conse- quence, vindictive of the violation of them : and this is the original justice, (as his are the original rights, and the fountain of all other,) and must have had place, though he had settled no express constitution of government. And also as, secondarily, it is conservative of the rights of the governed community, which, by the constitution, once settled, accrue to it. Whereupon also it maybe understood, in what sense punishments, passively taken, are to be accounted debts. And it is fitter to distinguish, and thereupon to explain, how they are or are not so, than at random to deny they are so at all, when our Lord hath taught us to pray, " For- give us our debts;" and when it is so plain in itself, that he who by delinquency hath forfeited his life, is most truly said to owe it to justice. Yea, and when, though the creditor pmna is said not to be so easily assignable, yet no doubt at all is made concerning the debtor ; for how ab- surdly should he be said to be a debtor, that owes no debt ! Therefore punishments are not of the nature of those debts, that according to the rules of communicative justice, arise by contract between man and man ; and which, as they arise by consent between the two covenanting parties, may as well cease by consent. But nothing hinders, but they may be such debts as are to be estimated by the dis- tributive justice of rulers, whereof we must either say, that of some, justice doth oblige human and secular rulers to exact the punishment ; or else, that magistratical justice would allow the remitting of all, and that no offences of any kind be ever at all punished. But if the justice of any secular rulers oblige them to punish some oflienders, then most of all that of the supreme and most absolute Ruler and Lord of all, whose rights are natural, and depend not on our consent, or any contract with us, no more than our consent was previous to our coming into being, or our becoming his creatures ; and whose justice must be more concerned to protect and vindicate his rights, than that of any earthly governor can be to preserve the rights of even the most considerable community : no community, nor all taken together, nor even the whole creation, being of any comparable value with the interest of the supreme and universal Ruler, himself alone; in respect of whom all nations are as the " drop of the bucket," &c. especially if we add, (though that be but of secondary consideration,) that the rights of the greatest, even the universal commu- nity of all mankind, are involved with his own, and that their common peace and order are to be preserved by punishments, even eternal ones, not as executed, but as threatened ; which, as hath been said, made the execution necessary, where the terms and method of remission are not complied with. And whereas it is reckoned difficult to assign the cre- ditor pcena:, the reason of that is not difficult to be assigned, if we consider what the true notion of a creditor is. And Chap. VIII. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 93 :t is not taken passively, for him who is intrusted with ano- ther's rights, at least is not so to be limited ; inasmuch as a man may be more properly creditor of what is his own than of what is another's; but actively, for one who trusts another. But the debitor poena is not intrusted with any thing, but is only to be punished when he can be met with, and duly brought thereto ; and therefore is not bound to offer himself to punishment, as another debtor is to pay what he owes ; who is to be active in the solution ; the de- linquent, passive only ; whence dare panas is rightly in- terpreted to siiffer punishment. And that this is all he is obliged to, is plain, if we consider that it is not the precept of the law that in this case obliges him, which only obliges to the doing of duty, but the annexed commination, which can only oblige to undergo punishment. Creditor indeed is chosen as a fit word to express the correlative unto debitor pasna ,- but by it we are to under- stsuid no more than only the object of this solution : so in iiuman governments, the governor is improperly, viz. as be is intrusted with the rights of the community. But in ■^ ■ the divine government, God himself, originally and radi- i S^ cally, as he is Maker and Lord of all ; immediately and < ». formally, as he is the supreme Ruler, and such a one there- fore as governs principally, sua jure, and for himself, not for others. For he cannot hut be his own supreme end ; that he also doth undertake the care of the concernments and good of others, is of mere vouchsafement and conde- scension, not from any antecedent obligation so to do. The sum of all therefore is, that whether we take Divine justice in the larger sense, as it comprehends all the moral excellences that relate to the government of God overman, especially his wisdom and his holiness, or whether we take it in a stricter sense, for a principle inclining him to maintain and vindicate the rights and dignity of his go- vernment, it did direct as well his making a constitution for the punishing of affronts and offences committed against it, as to proceed according to it, so as not to remit such injuries to the offender without most sufficient re- compense. CHAPTER VIII. The first head thus far insisted on, that a sufficient recompense was necessary : the second succeeds, that no less was sufficient than that made by Emmanuel, liishonour to have insisted nn less. What the divine estimate in this matter was. his own word shows. His love to oHenders otherwise under restraint. Proposed to consideration, 1 How ^reat tilings were to be remitted, the sins of all tinips, and ages. Not from nisufficiency unapplicable to all sinners. Remission to be granted, by a universal law. 2. How great to be vouclisafed. Wliich follows. I. 2. And so much being clear, there is less need to insist copiously in showing what comes next to be con- sidered; that"* no recompense could be sufficient for ex- piating the wrong done by the violation of God's temple among men, and the laying its foundations anew, besides that which hath been made by the Son of God, Emmanuel, God with us : becoming him.self first an original Temple, a Man, inhabited with all the fulness of God, and then made also a Sacrifice to the offended majesty and justice of Heaven, for those great and high purposes, the expia- ting the indignity of violating God's former temple, and the raising, forming, and beautifying il anew, in conformi- ty to its present pattern and original ; and then possessing, inhabiting, and restoring the Divine presence in it. II. For as it hath been shown already, that this recom- pense could not but be full, and apt to answer these pur- Eoses; so it is in itself evident, that whatsoever should e tendered in the name of a recompence, ought to he full, and proportionable to the wrong done, and to the favours afterwards to be shown to the transgressors. For it were manifestly more ht)nourable and worthy of God not to have exacted any recompense at all, than to have accepted, in the name of a sacrifice, such as were unproportionable, and beneath the value of what was to be remitted and conferred. What had been lower must have been infuiitely lower ; let any thing be supposed less than God, and it falls immensely short of him. Such is a Which i» the second head proposed to be discoursed, ch. vi. s. 2. the distance between created being and uncreated, that the former is as nothing to the latter; and therefore, bring the honour and majesty of the Deity to any thing less than an equal value, and you bring it to nothing. And this had been quite to lo.se the design of insisting upon a re- compense ; it had been to make the majesty of Heaven cheap, and depreciate the dignitj- of the divine govern- ment, instead of rendering it august and great. Therefore the whole constitution of En)manuel, his undertaking, per- formances, and acquisitions, ai)pearto have been not only apt, suitable, and sufilcient to the intended purposes, (which was first proposed to be shown,) but also requisite and necessary thereto. III. And for the evincing hereof, let us apply our minds to meditate silently and intently awhile on those words of our Lord, (John x. 17.) " Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life:" and let us consider them -with that reverence which we cannot but conceive due to words we esteem most sacred and divine ; i. e. thai they could not be rashly or lightly spoken : whereupon, let us bethink ourselves. Have those words a meaning 1 T'his, our awful regard to the venerable greatness of Him that spoke them, cannot suffer us to doubt. And if they mean any thing, it is impossible they should not mean some- what most profound and great; somewhat that implies a reference to a peculiar Qt'nrpcrii,i. e. a divine decorum, that as an eternal law perpetually conducts all the propen- sions and determinations of God's most perfect will, that could by no means suffer any violation : what wa^; most becoming of God ; viz. what might best " become him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things;" (Heb. ii. 10.) worthy of the great, all-comprehending, central, original Being, from whence all things sprang, and wherein all terminate. Here is some gradual reieclion (if we consider what immediately follows, " in bringing many sons to glory," &c.) of the veiled arcana of the Di- vine Being: if we may, on so fit occasion, allude to the in- scription in the Egyptian temple, elsewhere mentioned in this discourse — " I am all that was, and is, and shall be, and who is he that shall draw aside my veil ?" Here is, in some part, a withdrawing of that sacred veil, by Hira to whom by prerogative it belonged, and of whom it is said, " No man hath seen God at any time, but the only-begot- ten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath de- clared him," John i. IS. Here is some disclosure of the mystery of God, of the Father, (Col. ii. 2.) in whom the Divine nature was primarily, and as in that first founiain ; and of Christ, the mystery of the Mediator, of whom Christ was the distinguishing name. The agreement, hitherto inconceivable and most mysterious, of the absolute purity and perfection of the Divine nature, with the admirable mercifulness of the constitution of Emmanuel, of God and man united in one, in order to the reconciliation of the holy, blessed God, with unholy, miserable man. How was it to be brought about, in a way becoming him for whom and by whom all things were, so great, so august a Majes- ty ! that He should admit that so despicable and rebellious a race should not only be saved, but be made sonsl This could never be, though his immense and boundless love most strongly inclined him to it, but by their having one of highest dignity, his own Son, set as a Prince or Prefect t)ver the whole affair of their salvation ; nor by him but upon his own intervening suffering ! This was according to fixed rule indispensably necessary; i. e. by the inviola- ble maxims of the Divine government. But because, through the inconceivable riches of his own goodness, this was a thing he was most propense unto, and intent upon ; yet because the death of his own Son in their stead could neither be meritorious nor just, without his own free con- sent, therefore, says our Lord, doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life — What conceivable reason can there be of this connexion, (" He therefore loves me. because I lay down my life,") without the concurrence of these two things to be considered conjunctly 1 A most in- tense, vehement love to a perishing world. An inflexible regard to the eterna', immutable measures of right and wrong, fit and unfit, decent and indecent, that had their fixed, everlasting seat in the mind of God. 94 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. IV. The former made the cMfi necessary, the preventini,' the total, eternal ruin of a lost world ; the latter made the Son of God's death, and his own consenl thereto, the neces- sary means to this end. The former, viz. the end, was not otherwise necessary than upon supposition; it was not so absolutely necessary, that by any means, right or wrong, fit or unfit, such a ruin (even most deserved^ must be pre- vented. But it was so far necessary, as tnat if, by any rightful and decorous means, this ruin could be prevented as to many, and a contrary blessed state of perpetual life be attained by them, this must be efiected and brought about for them. Not, 'lis true, for all offenders, but as many as the like eternal, indispensable means and mea- sures of equal and imequal, fit and unfit, capable and in- capable, should not exclude. All this we have in that most admirable text of Scrip- ture, (John iii. 16.) "God .so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." So loved! The matter is signified in such a way, as to leave all men amazed ! and by their astonishment to supply their most defective conception of so stupendous a love. The ^corUl is an indefinite term, that contains the special and the afterwards specified object of this love; not a single per- son, but a whole race of intelligent creatures, a world inhabited by such, that were not to be left, and finally all swallowed up together in one common ruin ; that upon this account he gave his only-begotten Son to death, as the event and known design showed. And how incon- ceivable must his love be tohisonly-begoUen Son ! " The Brightness of his glory, the express Image of his person !" always his delight ! Yet rather than allthis world should be lost for ever. He is thus given up ! " That whosoever believe on him, should not perish," &c. which expresses the certain, specified, declared object of this love : leaving them certainly excluded, who, after sufficient proposal, re- fuse their homage to the throne of Emmanuel; choose rather their forlorn souls should be for ever forsaken of the Divine presence, than unite with him, and surrender themselves to him, by whom alone they might be refitted, an imated again, and inhabited as his living temples. Their exclusion is necessary, by such measures as those, by which such means were necessary to the salvation and ble-ssedness of the others. But who can doubt hereupon, but that this course was indispensably necessary to this end? Especially if (reviewing that first-mentionsd text) we consider, that our Lord represents his laying down his life as an une.xpressible additional endearment of him to the Father : q. d. " O thou Son of my delights, thou hast now set my love to lost souls at liberty, that hath been ever pregnant with great and godlike designs towards them, and that must otherwi.se have been under perpetual re- straint:" which is most evidently implied. V. But it may be said. Could the love of God be under restraint 1 And I say no, it could not; therefore, to the all-comprehending Mind, where ends and means lie con- nected together under one permanent, eternal view, this course presented itself, as peculiarly accommodate to this end; and was therefore eternally determined by easy con- cert between the Father and the Son, not to remedy, but prevent any such restraint. Yet it may be further urged, Cannot the absoluteness and omnipotency of a God enable him to satisfy his own propensions, if it were to save never so many thousand worlds of offending creatures, without taking such a circuit as this "? It was once said to a human mortal king, that had about him but a thin shadow of sovereignty, Dost thou now govern Israel, and not make thy will any way take place 1 Much more might it here be said, Dost thou govern the world 1 Art thou not God 1 Yes ! and may freely say, I can the less, for that I am God, do what is not Godlike; i. e. can therefore the less break through established, eternal measures, and counteract ni}^- self I must do as becomes Him, for whom and by whom are all things. Others may assume to themselves an ima- gined, unhallowed liberty of pursuing, at the next, their own inclinations; but it is beneath divine greatness to do so. Yet in this case (it may be further said) why did not love to his Son preponderate? Which our Lord himself in great part obviates by whnt is subjoined— "because I lay down my life." How ? With a power and design to take it again, as v. 18. " I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again, q. d. This is a matter agreed, I am not to lie under a perpetual death ; that could neither be grateful to my Father, nor is in itself possible. But as things are staled, I am prepared to endure the cross, and despise the shame, for the joy set before me ; which joy will be everlastingly common to him and me, and to the whole redeemed community, according to their measure." But was all this unnecessary trifling 1 What serious man's reverence of Deity can let him endure to harbour so profane a thought 1 Therefore take we now the entire state of this matter, as it lies plainlj^ in view be- fore us, in these texts of Scripture. 1. Here is an unex- pressibie love of God to undone, lost sinners. 2. Here is a plain intimation that this love must have been under a suspension and a restraint, if God's own Son had not laid down his life for them. 3. It is as plainly signified, that the Son of God's laying down his life for them, was, in divine estimate, a sufficient expedient to prevent this re- straint upon his love to sinners. 4. That this expedient was reckoned by tJie blessed God more eligible, than that his love to sinners should be under perpetual, everlasting restraint. 5. That it was only reckoned more eligible, as there was a conjunct consideration had of his laying it down, with a power and design of resuming and taking it again. 6. That therefore, as the eternal God had a most constant, unquestionable love to his only-begotten Son, his love to him hath a peculiar and most complacential exercise, on the account of his concurring with him upon this expedient ; choosing rather to endure all the dolours of that " one hour, and power of darkness," that was to come upon him, than that a whole world of rea.sonable creatures, his own offspring, and bearing his own image, should all perish together everlastingly. But who now sees not that this was the determinate judgment of the great God, viz. that his gracious designs towards guilty creatures were not otherwise to he effected, than in this way? And yet, for the further clearing of this matter, taking Heb. x. 4. that the blood of the Lord Christ, and of bulls and goats, are put in direct opposition to each other; and hereupon, that it is said of the latter, "It is not possible it should take away sin;" what can that imply less, than that the former was necessary to the taking it away ? Let us but appeal to ourselves, what else can it mean ? Will we say, though sin could not be taken away by the blood of bulls and goats, it might by some nobler sacrifice of an intermediate value ? But is not this mani- festly precluded, and barred by the immediateness of the opposition? These two only are in competition, and it is said, not this, but that. Other sacrifices God would not; (Psal. xl. 6, 7.) then, saith our Lord, " Lo ! I come." These are rejected, this is chosen ; he takelh away the first, that he may establish the second, Heb. x. 9. When it is said, (Mic. vi. 6, 7.) not thousands of rams, or ten thousand rivers of oil; if one should say, Yea, but eleven thousand might serve ; were not this trifling, not reason- ing ? Is it not plain all other were refusable, for the same reason ? I shall now somewhat enlarge (as was formerly designed) upon the two tilings already intimated under the foregoing head of Emmanuel's sufficiency, &c. as having acquired the two-fold power of forgiving sin, and giving the Spirit. And shall now show, further, the necessity of his engaging in this afrair(the restoringof God's temple) with reference to bot?i these things, requisite thereto. And to this purpose, let it be considered — What was to be remitted, and what was to be conferred, by the procure- ment. 1. What was to be remitted. It was not the single trespass of one or a few delinquent persons, but the revolt and rebellion of a vast community; a universal hostility and enmity, continued and propagated through many suc- cessive agents, that was now, once for all, to be atoned for. It is hereupon to be considered — How great the offence was that must be remitted. The way and manner in which the grant was to be made of this remission. 1. How great was the offence to be remitted ! A whole race and order of creatures had been in a conspiracy against their rightful Lord, to deface his temple, tear down his image, invade his rights, withhold and incapacitate them- Cmv. VIII. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 95 selves for his worship, substitute, instead of that, highest contempt, banish his presence, and as much as in them lay raze out his memorial, that he might be no more known, feared, or served upon earth ! How horrid a prospect had the Lord from heaven, when, from the throne of his glory there, he beheld the state of thmgs below ! (Ps. xiv. 2, 3.) " The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if any did understand, and seek after God ; they are all gone back, none that does good, no not one." All were become such mischievous, wicked fools, els to say, with one consent, in their hearts, — No God ! And though, it is true, this wickedness was not in event to be actually remitted to all, the case was to be so stated, that remission might be universally offered ; and that it be left to lie upon men's own score if it were not accepted ; and therefore, that a sacrifice must be offered up, of no less value than if every single transgressor was to have his actual, sealed pardon. VI. For let it be considered what sort of transgressors are excluded the benefit of remission, on the account of that great Sacrifice that once for all was offered up ; and we find it not difficult to apprehend other most important reasons why they are excluded ; but no colour of a reason that it should be for want of sufficient value in this Sacri- fice. i. As for the angels that fell, though their case comes not directly under our present consideration, yet occasion- ally, and as (d fortiori) we may argue from it, some thoughts may usefully be employed about it. The Divine pleasure herein is indeed intimated, in the Son of God's not taking tkeir nature, but ours ; and his known measure of showing mercy is, that he will show mercy, because he will show mercy. Yet, whereas we find that the most sovereign act of grace, the predestinating of some to the adoption of children, is ascribed to the good pleasure, (Eph. i. 5.) the same act is ascribed also to the counsel of his will, I'. II. And when we see the apostle in that holy transport, (Rom. xi. 33.) crying out, in contempla- tion of distinguishing mercy, w pa9os — Othe depth! he doth not say of the sovereign power, but of the wisdovi and knowledge of God ; and admires the unsearchableness, not of his arbitrary determinations, but of his judgments and wa)''s, or judicial proceedings towards them that believed, or believed not: (Ps. xxx. 31, 32.) implying he had rea- sons to himself, though past our finding out, of his different proceedings towards some, and others. And as for the angels that fell, and whom he thought fit not to spare, (2 Pet. ii. 4, 5. Jude 6.) he threw them into chains of dark- ness, resolving to deal with them, not upon terms of abso- lute Sovereignty, but of justice, therefore reserving them to the judgment of the great day ; not in the meantime affording them a second trial, in order to their recovery, as he hath to us, even of mere mercy ; for no justice could oblige him to offer us new terms. Yet their case and ours so differed, that there are reasons obvious to view, and which must lie open to all, in the public, final judgment, why he might judge it fitter to design the objects of mercy among men, than the apostate angels. As, 1. That we must suppose them (cir. the angels) created, each of them, in perfect inaturily, unto which we (our first parents excepted) grow up gradually and by slow degrees. Thei/ had their intellectual ability lit lor present exercise, when they first existed, and did all then at once co-exist ; (as we generally reckon, having nothing to induce us to think otherwise ;) we come into being successively, and exist here but in a succession. 2. Whereas they therefore must be understood to have been originally under a sort of covenant of works, (as we were,) or were some way or other made to understand what, lay the law of their creation, was their duty towards the Author of their beings, and what their expectations might be from him ; we have no reason therefore to appre- hend that they were treated with, in one common head of their own order, in whom they should stand or fall, as we were ; our case not admitting it to be otherwi.se, because we were not co-existent with him. But we must conceive them to have been, every individual of them, personal covenanters, each one in his own person receiving the sig- nification of their Maker's will; and if there were reason or need of solemn restipulation, each one in his own per- son as it were plighting his faith, and V3wing his alle- giance to the celestial crown and throne. They ihcrefbre, from a self-contracted malignity, rebelled wiih open eyes; and though an obligation by a common head were bind- ing, theirs, by their own act and deed, must be more strongly binding, and their revolt more deeply and more heinously criminal. 3. The posterity of our apostate first parents have bui a limited time, in this state of probation, wherein to under- stand the present altered state of things between them and their offended Lord : within which time, though he foresaw the malignity of very many would never be overcome by his goodness, in the ordinarj' meihods wheiein he reckoned it became him to discover and exercise it towards them, yet according to the course and law of nature he had now settled for this apostate sinful world, their course would soon be run out, and they w^ould not have opportunity long to continue their rebellion, and obstruct his interest and designs on earth. And also, having all things ever present to his all-comprehending view, he foreknew and foredetermined that great numbers should become the captives of his grace, and that the love and blood of an Emmanuel should not be lost and thrown away upon them. He should make them " willing in the day of his power" to fall in with gracious intendmenis, and their Re- deemer should see his seed, and the travail of his .soul, and be satisfied therein : whereas he beheld the apostate spirits of that higher order fixed in enmity, not vincible by any ordinary methods. Nor was it to be expected he should exert (in this case) his absolute power, and act ad iilti- vmm, as a natural agent doih, to its very uUermost. (Had he thought fit, he could as well have prevented their re- volt.) Or that he should have appointed a Redeemer for their recovery, who were irrecoverable : their case at first being (probablv) very parallel to theirs among men, who sin "that sin a"gainst the Holy Ghost." And as things lay in divine prospect, their malicious opposition to God's designs in this world was not bounded within the narrow limits of a short human life, their natures not being sub- ject to a law of mortality, as it is with every sinner among men; but they were beheld as continually filling this world with mischiefs, with wickednesses and rni.^erics, and counterworking all God's glorious and merciful de- signs in it ; even every one of them, from his first apos- tacy, as long as the world shall last. 4. Man sinned at first, being seduced, tempted, and de- ceived by the devil. The devils, as being their own tempters, sin had in and from them its original and first rise in the creation of God. In all agency, whether of good or evil, much is wont to be attributed to this, Who •was first in it ? In point oi good, the blessed God hath no competitor ; he is the undoubted first Fountain of all good, and is therefore acknowledged the supreme Good. In point of evil, (viz. moral,) there is none prior to the devil, who is therefore eminently called the evil, or icicked one. And as the devils were first in sin, so they led us into it, b)' deceiving us; the malignity of it was therefore the greater on their parts, and proportionably the less on ours. The more knowing are the more deeply guilty,thedeceivei than the deceived, and deserve the more stripes. 'Tis true that none can deserve mercy, for then it were justice, and not mercy ; but though none can deseiwe to have mercy shown them, they may deserve not to have it. The more a ruler is above us, and the less he needs us, the less pos- sible it is for us to oblige him, and the more possible to disoblige and offend him, and the more heinous will the offence be : therefore, though none can claim mercy, they may forfeit it; and will, by the deeper guilt, incur such a forfeiiure, by how much the more and clearer the light and knowledge is against which they offend. And this we find to have been a measure with the blessed God, in the exercise of his mercy, even in some of the highest instances hereof that we meet with in holy Scripture ; " I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly, in unbelief," I Tim. i. Not that this could specify a more deserving object of mercy ; for where there can be no desert at all, tiiere can be no more, or less. VII. But it represents the occasion and season of show- ing mercy more fitly, in the estimate of the Divine wisdom, which conducts the acts of sovereignty ; and judges of 96 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 11, congruities, as justice doth of right and wrong. Where indeed, among the objects of mercy, there is an absolute parity, there (as to them) mere sovereignty determines; as it may be ordinarily, in God's electing among men the objects of his free favour. Where there is no objective reason of eligibility in one more than another, especially if there be such as would rather persuade the contrary way, wisdom hath no proper exercise. But occasions are of greater latitude, and comprehend all considerable cir- cumstances and consequences ; and many things lie open to the Divine eye, that are hid to ours. But now, whereas we cannot doubt, that besides such considerations as occur to us, the blessed God saw super- abundant ground of not making such provision for the re- covery of fallen angels, as of lost men ; we can have none, whereupon to imagine the former partake not of the bene- fit with the latter, for want of value in the sacrifice of Emmanuel. For when the blood of his cross is intimated to extend to all things both in heaven and earth; (Col. i. 20.) to diffuse an influence through the universe ; to be the cement of the creation, in what part and for what time it shall continue, subordinately to the Creator's pleasure and purposes ; and that by Him, who shed it even as such, all things are said to consist: and that besides his natural right, he hath acquired by the superabundant value of this sacrifice, (the odours whereof are spread through all worlds,) a universal dominion ; and particularly, to be Head of all principalities and powers ; to establish the faithful and loyal, to judge and punish the disloyal, over whom he so gloriously triumphed on the cross ; (Col. ii. 15.) to have every knee bow to him, &c. (Phil. ii. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.) it cannot be, doubtless, but the value of the same sacrifice had sufficed to obtain a power as well as to govern and judge all, to establish and reward the good, to punish the bad; to have obtained that, upon terms, par- don and mercy might have reached down into the infernal regions, if they that inhabit them cwild upon other accounts have been thought a pardonable or tractable sort of delin- quents. And if we cannot apprehend this great Sacrifice to want value even to make atonement for devils, we can as little think it .should want value to save. VIII. 2. The impenitent and unbelieving among men, nnder the gospel ; and that it must therefore also be for some other reason, that such perish. As, (1.) If there be any thing of reason in -what hath been discoursed concerning the state of the lapsed angels, their continuance in wilful impenitency and infidelity partly supposes, partly makes, the state of things with them the same. 1. Partly supposes it so. For it implies they have been applied to and treated with personally, upon the terms of the second covenant ; i. e. the covenant of God in Christ, as the apostate angels were upon the first. And if the guilt of the former apostates was so horridly great upon this account, the guilt of the latter must be proportionably so on the same account. 2. Partly makes it the same. For hereby, as they were violators first and immediately in their own persons of the first covenant, so are these of the second. For, generally, they that live under the gospel are professed covenanters ; and if they were not, they could not but have become obliged to have been so, by the very proposal and tender thereof unto them; or, as soon as the mind of Him who made them, concerning this matter, was known. They were not obliged by their own consent, but they were obliged to it; and by an incomparably greater and deeper obligation ; not by their own act and deed, but by His who gave them breath. What is their authority over themselves, compared with that of the Supreme Lawgiver? A mere borrowed subordinate thing, without and apart from him, without whom their being itself were mere no- thing ! An argument ad homincvi, is convictive, in dispu- tation, between one man and another ; but how much more overpowering means of conviction will there be in the judgment of the great day! And the parity of cases be- tween the angels that fell, and insolent sinners under the gospel, is intimated as monitory to the latter, in those texts of Scripture that speak of God's most just and terrible se- verity to the former ; viz. the sin of both was apostacy, according to the different covenants or laws under which they stood. For as the one 5ort were apostates from God, so the others were from Christ, denying the Lord that bought them, 2 Pet. ii. 1. And again, " turning the gra.ce of God into lasciviousness, rind denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ," Jude 4. Whereupon, this example of God's vengeance upon the angels that fell is subjoined in both places. Besides what was common to them with the apostate angels, there were some things peculiar to these wilful refusers of the grace of the gospel, and violators of the gospel-covenant. As, 1. That the guilt of wilful sinners under the gospel ad- mits of this aggravation above that of the rebelling angels, that they oflend against the grace of the remedy, never offered to the other ; treading underfoot the Son of God, profaning the blood of the covenant, wherewith they were sanctified, as an unholy thing, and doing despite unto the Spirit of grace, Heb. x. 29. And, 2. That the offer itself, made to them, carried in it a. manifest signification of their (remote) claimable right to the benefits of the gospel-covenant, on supposition of their compliance with the terms of it, (unto which the fallen angels could have no pretence,) barred only by their non- acceptance or refu.sal, which appears in the general tenor of the gospel-covenant itself: " Ho, every one that thirsts" — " Whosoever will, let him come, and take of the waters of life freely" — " God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him, should not perish." — And it is here to be noted, that a secret in- tention gives not a claimable right, but some overt-act or deed ; and it must be claimable, before it ought to be claimed or accepted. This is the case then with the wil- fully impenitent and rebellious under the gospel, that it may be truly said of them, " You might have had pardon and eternal life, if you had not rejected the kindest ofiers." It is not therefore want of value in this sacrifice, but their rejection, whence it is unavailable to them. As for them that could never have the gospel, or infants incapable of receiving it, we must consider the Holy Scriptures were written for those that could use them, not for those that could not ; therefore to have in.serted into them an account of God's methods of dispensation towards such, had only served to gratify the curious and unconcerned, not to in- struct or benefit such as were concermed. And it well be- came hereupon the accurate wisdom of God, not herein to indulge the vanity and folly of man. IX. 2. Now let it hereupon be considered, in what way was this to be done ; not otherwise than by enacting and publishing a universal law, that whosoever should comply with such and such terms, expressed in that law, (as, for instance, repentance towards God, and faith in Jesus Christ,) should be actually and finally pardoned and saved. And this being now the plain slate of the case, let any sober unprejudiced mind make a judgment of it, what this matter would come to, if there had not been a com- pensation made, as a formdation to this law, and the pub- lication of it. They that exalt one Divine perfection, to the diminution of several others; that, for instance, so plead for the absoluteness and sovereignty of God's mercy, as not to adjust therewith the determinations of his wisdom, purity, righteousness, forget that they hereby make any satisfaction by a Redeemer unnecessary, (and by conse- quence make Christ, whom they cannot deny to have suf- fered and died, being innocent, to have died in vain,) nor do allow in their own thoughts its just weight to this state of the case, — that the method in which God was to exer- cise his pardoning mercy, was by publishing an edict for that purpose, that was to extend all the world over, and through all the successions of time. They know this is the course the wisdom of God hath pitched upon, and yet, taking the case as it is, would have this large, uni- versal tenor of the gospel to proceed upon no foregoing compensation. The great God requires it should be pro- claimed to all the world, " Ho, every one that thirsts, come to the waters" — " Whosoever believes shall not perish, but have life everlasting" — " If the wicked turn from all the sins he hath committed, he shall not die : all his transgressions shall not be mentioned" — " Repent, so your iniquities shall not be your ruin" — " Come to me, all ye that are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest" — " Go preach the go.spel to every creature; whoso- Chap. IX. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 9j ever believes shall he saved." This is the known tenor of the gospel, directed without liniiialion to all the ends of I the earth; "Look to me, and be saved; all sin and blas- tphemy shall be forgiven lo men." That gospel which de- termines whosoever believes shall be saved, is directed to be preached to all nations. He did first, by his angels from heaven, indefinitely proclaim, " Peace on earth, and good-will towards men:" and pursuant hereto was the commission given by our ascending Lord to his apostles and ministers that should succeed to the end of the world. Now suppose that without reference to, or mention any where made of, this compensation to the justice of God, there must be an offer made of such mercy, not to pre- sent delinquents only, but to all, in all future times and ages ! X. With what methods of government would such a course as this agree 1 I the rather insist upon this, both as apprehending it to have its own great weight, and that perhaps it hath escaped the consideration of the most, in treating of this important subject ; yet, what is more ob- vious 1 It is one thing for a prince, bj'^ a private act of grace, to pardon a particular person that hath offended him without insisting upon any recompense ; another thing to do it to a multitude, not only that had now trans- gressed, but that should do so in any future time. Lighter minds may perhaps at first sight reckon this would only so much the more magnify the mercy of God above that of man, "whose ways are not as our ways, nor his thoughts as our thoughts." And so indeed doth the way he hath taken for the pardoning of sin infinitely exceed all human thought, Isa. Iv. 6,7, 8. Butw^e must take heed of being so inconsiderately officious, as to prescribe him wa3's of exalting one attribute, to the depressing of another ; and so lo set him above men in one respect, as to throw him in another below himself, yea, and below men too : i. e. not more to set him above them in point of mercy, than be- neath them in point of governing wisdom and righteous- ness. And if any would be so insolent to prescribe to him, they might have thought the inconvenience of such a uni- versal edict might have been avoided, by his sending an angel, or affording some particular revelation, to every man he would have turn to him, and repent. But were it dutiful so to correct his way of dispensation 1 And con- sider how this way he hath chosen would square with the ordinary measures of government, without the foundation laid which we are asserting. That prince would cer- tainly never be so much magnified for his clemency and mercy, as he would be despised by all the world for most remarkable defects of government, that should not only pardon whosoever of his subjects had offended him, upon their being sorry for it, but go about to provide a law that should obtain in his dominions, through all after-time, that whosoever should oft'end against the government, with whatsoever insolency, malignity, and frequency, if they repented, they should never be punished, but be taken forthwith into highest favour. Admit that it had been congruous to the wisdom and righteousness of God, as well as his goodness, to have pardoned a particular sin- ner, upon repentance, without satisfaction; yet nothing could have been more apparently unbecoming him, than to settle a universal law, for all future time, to that pur- pose ; that let as many as would in any age, to the world's end, affront him never so highly, invade his rights, trample his authority, tear the constitution of his government, thev should, upon their repentance, be forgiven, and not only not be punished, but be most highly advanced and digni- fied. XI. And though he hath, upon the recompense made him by his Son for all this injury, declared he will do all this ; they ccepting their Redeemer and Saviour for their Ruler and Lord, and returning to their state of subjection and duty to him.self, in him ; yet it were enough to make the world tremble and fall astonished at his foot-stool, to have peace and reconciliation offered them only upon such terms ; and to behold God's own Son made a sacrifice to his justice, and a public spectacle to angels and men, for the expiation of the wrong done ; and "enough to make all men despair of ever finding such another sacrifice, if they should reject the terms upon which only the value and meritoriousness of this can be available for them. They can never, .after this, have pretence to think it a light matter to offend God, or to think that he looks with indifferency upon sin, or counts it a sujall matter. And suppose it possible a single delinquent might have been pardoned, without such atonement made for his offence; the design of God's unbounded mercy not being so nar- row, but so vastly oomprehensive as to require the settling of a stated course for the reducing and saving of lost souls, in all times and ages; .since a Redeemer of so high dig- nity was to be constituted for this purpose; it had been an unexpressible injury to him, a detraction from the kind- ness of his undertaking and the authority of his office, that any thing of mercy should be shown in this kind, but in him and by him alone. But that it may be further understood how requisite it was such atonement should be made, such a sacrifice of- fered, for the sins of men, in order to Go#s settling his temple and presence with them ; we were to consider, not only what was to be remitted, which we have done, but also what was to be communicated, viz. his blessed Spirit, in pursuance of the same gracious purpose ; which re- mains to be done in what follows. CHAPTER IX. ConceiTiing the gift or communication of the .^rint- The gospel the means of it. The inseparable conne.\ion hereof with llie former, the imparting of" righteousness, for removing the guilt of sin. In what sense the Holy Spirit of God IS said to be given, or communicated. What personal union signifies. How personal presuJice, vital union, communicated influences, concern the inijuiry. In what respect the necessity asserted of this communication. Since such fulness of^Spirit in Emmanuel, purposely for communication ; how comes it to pass he, thereby, raises no more such temples ? The neces- sity of this communication, for this purijose. represented t«o ways : bv show- ing, 1 That thi- Holy Scripture teaches that God doth give his Spirit.' thouch undtrdisliiict nutions, only through Christ. 2. That it was most rcasonabfe, and thrriliirr ruri'ssary it should be so. The doctrine of Scripture herein proposed under si.\ heads. 1. Whsreas there could be no restoration of this tem- ple of God with men (as hath been shown) without the concurrence of these two things: remission of sin — emis- sion of the Holy Spirit — and that it was undertaken to show, that these were so great things, as that the wisdom of God judged it not meet to vouchsafe them in another way, than by constituting the Emmanuel invested with a full power, by his own acquisition, in an unexceptionable, legal way, to dispense, and effect both of them ; where- upon, as we have seen, this constitution was abundantly sufficient, so it now also must appear necessary, for this purpose. Having endeavoured to evince this necessity concerning the former of these, remission of sin, upon con- sideration of the vast amplitude and the peculiar way of this remission ; we are now to show it concerning the latter, viz. the emission or communication of the Holy Spirit. The rich sufficiency of Emmanuel, so constituted, as to be furni.shed with this power of giving the Spirit, hath been already seen, and that in a two-fold respect; viz. both in respect of the end of its communication, that the indi.sposed, unwilling heart of man might be prepared and maile willing again to receive the Divine presence ; and in respect of the way wherein it was to be communicated ; viz. in a way suitable to man's intelligent nature, by re- presentation of the glorious object by which his souTwas to be impressed. Emmanuel himself, represented as the original, excvipJary temple ; and also represented as made a sacrifice: as Avas discoursed chap. v. Whereby the two purposes are answered, mentioned chap. vi. s. 1. For which it was requisite this constitution of Emmanuel should be, and should be declared and made known tons: that the blessed God might, upon terms not injurious to himself, give his own consent ; and might, in a wav not unsuitable to us, gain ours. Both which he is graciously pleased to assume to himself, for his part, in his transac- tions with us about this matter ; leaving it for our parr, being so assisted, to consider what is represented to us : and thereupon, actually to give our own consent. Whereupon we are not to look upon the gospel of the Son of God as a useless or unnecessary thing. It is the ministration of .spirjt and life, (2 Cor. iii". 6.) aiid the power 98 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. of God to salvation to every one that believes ; (Rom. i. lo.) all apt instrument of such impressions upon the spi- rits of men as are necessary to their being formed into living temples; the sword of the Spirit. Not that any good ■work is wrought by the inanimate gospel: the letter kills; but it is the Spirit that gives life, 2 Cor. iii. An instru- ment comes under the general notion of means, which signify somewhat middle between the efficient and the ef- fect. And suppose an agent able etfectually to use them ; a sword is a fit instrument for its proper use, supposing a hand able to wield it. The communication therefore of the Spirit, is t^at we are principally now to consider. And as the constitution of Emmanuel was sufficient, in its own kind, and for its own proper purpose, in this restoration ; so we are to show the necessity of it, for this same purpose. There ought to be a concurrence of these two, in the Cause, the Restorer, of this temple; viz. A fulness of righteousness, to be so imparted as that it may be a ground upon which sin may be forgiven : and, A fulness of Spirit, from whence vital influence may be communicated and transfused . Inasmuch, as it is most evident, there cannot but be a connexion of what is correspondent thereto in the eifect, viz. the temple itself restored, it must be full of life, 1 Pet. ii. 4, 5. For can it be thought the righteousness of the Son of God should ever be the clothing of a carcass 1 Wiihout union with Christ, no man can have either: neither his righteousness nor his indwelling Spirit. Nor can they be separable, with reference to the designed end. It is an unsupposable thing, that one should be God's temple enlivened, and animated by his own Spirit, and yet be rmder remaining guilt, and liable every moment to his consuming wrath ; or that he could be any whit the better, to have all his former guilt taken off, and be still " dead in trespasses and sins !" Wherefore this latter is of equal necessity. Hither therefore we have reserved the larger discourse we intended of the gift or communication of the Spirit, as the most proper place for it. And by way of preparation hereto, two things are liot unfit to be briefly opened. I. How or in what sense the Spirit is said to be given at all, or communicated. 2. In what respect we assert a ne- cessity in reference to this communication. II. 1. It will not be inconvenient to say somewhat of the true import of the phrase giving the Spirit. It is evident, that whereas giving imports some sort of communication, there is yet a sense wherein that blessed Spirit is, to any creature, simply incommunicable. There is a T!coix'''9')<'ii, or m\\U\^\ in-being, of the .sacred Persons in the Godhead, which is most peculiar to themselves, not communicable to creatures with them ; and which is natural and neces- sary, not gratuitous, and whereto therefore the notion of gift no way agrees. We cannot yet be ignorant, that be- cause the Holy Spirit is sometimes called the Spint of God, sometimes the Spirit of Christ, some bold, assuming en- thusiasts, upon pretence of being possessed of this Spirit, have taken the liberty of uttering " great swelling words of vanity," and to talk of being godded with God, and christed with Christ. Yet, because the expressions of giving the Spirit, of receiving, of having the Spirit, of our being in the Spirit, and of his being and dwelling or abiding in us, are phrases of known and frequent use in Scripture ; whether in relation to extraordinary purposes and operations, peculiar to some, or to ordinary, common to all that are sincere in the Christian church : such ex- pressions are therefore by no means to be rejected or dis- used; but cautiously used, and vmderstood in a sound and sober sense. We find no difficulty in apprehending how God is said to give any thing diverse or distinct from himself; as houses, lands, riches, &c. when in the mean- time we will confess it not so easy to conceive of his giving what is within the verge of Deity, or that is of and belonging to himself. Same have thought, that by the Spirit jjiven, we are to understand the operations and ef- fects of the Spirit, cvtraordinanj, as of prophecy, working miracles, &€. and ordinary, (which concern our present purpose,) the graces, habits, acts, and influences of the Spirit. Others, finding it so expressly said of the Spirit himself, spoken of as a person, that he shall be given, he shall abide with, and shall or doth dwell with or in you ; (John xiv. 15, 16. Rom. viii. in divers verses of those chapters ;) have thought it too diminishing, and beneath the sense of those places, to understand them of any thing less than the very person of the Spirit. And some, reckon- ing the particle in to import union, have therefore incogi- tantly spoken of a personal union between the Holy Spi- rit and believers. Others, more cautiously, of his indwell- ing, personal presence in them : as a greater thing, and more answerable to the letter of such texts, than their only having in thejn his graces or gracious influences. Ill If one may adventure to give a censure and judg- ment upon all this, I conceive, 1. That if any will make use of metaphysical terms, they should take them in the sense Avherein metaphysi- cians use them ; which they do not, who speak of a per- sonal tinion between Christ, or the Spirit of Christ, and believers. For by personal union is never wont to be meant a union of one person with another, but a union of the singular nature with this peculiar manner of subsist- ence, whereby is constituted one person ; i. e. that by per- sonal union is meant, not the subjects of union, as if it only signified that several persons remaining distinct were yet some way or other united v/ith one another ; which, so taken, were a very lax expression, and which, according to various capacities persons may admit of, would be of vast extent, and may reach to domestical, political, and I know not how many more imions ; which cannot but be much beneath what such men must be understood to intend : but that expression, personal miion, means the result of union, whereby the mentioned two become one person. And therefore they that speak in this stricter and more proper sense of personal union of the Spirit and believers, do most unwarily assert a nearer union between the Spirit and believers than that of the sacred persons in the God- head with each other. For they who acknowledge them one in Godhead, do yet as commonly deny them to be one person, and assert them to be ever three distinct persons: and this must be as much above what such men will avow and stand by. Therefore that expression can, in this case, admit no tolerable sense ax all, distinctly expressive of any thing that can be truly meant by it. 2. That, of a personal indtuelling presence, can by no means be denied. The plain import of many texts of Scripture is so full to this purpose, that to take them other- wise, exclusively of this, is not to i/Uerpret Scripture, but deny it. 3. Yet this expression oi a per sono2 indwelling presence, taken alone, doth not signify any peculiar distinguishing privilege of believers from others ; but what is common to all men and creatures. For can we acknowledge God to be omnipresent, and deny it of any person of the Godhead 1 Therefore, the Spirit's personal presence alone doth not distinguish believers from others, even though we suppose that presence to be never so intimate: God is all, and in all, more inward or intimate to ns than ve are to our- selves ; an assertion carrying its own evidence so fully in itself, as easily to be transferred from the pagan academy to the Christian church, so as generally to obtain in it. 4. That therefore such as speak of the Spirit's being present, by his gracious influences, operations, and effects, suppose his personal presence, from which they can no more be severed, than the beams from the body of the sun. The way of Divine operation being also by an immediate- ness both virtutis et supposili, of both poorer and person, as it is commonly, and fitly enough, wont to be spoken. If any therefore should speak of the Spirit's personal presence, as secluding gracious effects wrought thereby, they do not herein say a greater thing than the others, but much less. For though there can't be any gracious effects without the present person of the Spirit, jei we all know he may be personally present where he produces no such effects: it is therefore his being so present, as to be the productive cause of sUch blessed effects, that is any one's peculiar advantage. It is very possible to have the person- al presence of some great and munificent personage, and be nothing the better for it, if his favour be shut up to- wards m». It is only his communicative presence that I can be the better for, which depends upon free good-will. 5. It is therefore only the free, gracious presence of the Chap. IX. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 99 Spirit, that can be the matter of gift and of promise ; not that which is necessary, or impossible not to be, which is peculiar and distinguishing. Mere personal presence, as the Divine essence itself, is every where, by necessity of nature, not by vouchsafement of grace ; and therefore no way comports with the notion of giving, or of promise. 6. Therefore giving the Spirit import.s, in the full sense of it, two things : (I.) Somewhat real, when he vouchsafes to be in us, as the spring and fountain of gracious communications, influ- ences, and effects, which are most distinct from himself For the cause is uncreated : the eflect is the new creature, ■with whatsoever was requisite to produce, sustain, im- prove, and perfect it; though so like its cause, in nature, as to bear its name. " That which is born of the Spirit, is spirit," John iii. 6. And because he is said to be in Christians, who are truly such, and they in him ; which are words very expressive of union ; that union is most properly vital, as whereof holy life is the immediate re- sult : " I live, yet not I, but Christ" {i. c. by his Spirit) " liveth in me." Nor, otherwise, could such be living temples, animated from Emmanuel. (2.) Somewhat relative, the collation of a right to such a presence, for such purposes; which hath no dithculty. We easily conceive how the meanest persons may, by vouchsafement, have relation to, and interest in, the great- est ; so God gives Himself, his Son, his Spirit, to them that covenant with him, as we also take the Father, Son, and Spirit, to be our God ; as the baptismal form signifies. And when we so covenant, then hath this giving ils full and complete sense. And now, having thus far seen in what sense the blessed Spirit of God may be said to be given or communicated, we come next briefly to show, as the other intended premise, IV. 2. In what respect we arc here, pursuantly to the drift and design of the present discourse, to afhrm a neces- s^itij, in reference to this communication. It may admit a twofold reference : backward, to the constitution of Em- manuel, on which it depends; — forward, to the restoration of God's temple, which depends on it. There was a con- sequent, moral necessity of this communication ; upon what the Emmanuel was, did, suffered, and acquired. There was an antecedent, natural necessity of it, in order to what was to be effected, and done by it. Ln the former respect, it was necessary in point of right, as it stood re- lated to its meriting cause. In the latter respect, it was necessity in fact, as it stood related to its proper designed effect, which could only be brought about by it. In short ; the communication of the Spirit was necessary to the re- storing of this temple. The constitution of Emmanuel Avas necessary to the communication of the Spirit. This former necessity hath, in great part, been evinced already, in representing the ruinous state of God's temple among men, when Emmanuel undertook the reparation of it ; and in treating of his abundant rich sufficiency for this undertaking. Yet, there will be farther occasion to say more of it in the progress of the following discourse ; the other will more directly come under our consideration in what follows; wherein, however, we must have reference to both promiscuously, pursuant to what hath been said. For as we have shown, that the immense fulness of both righteousness and Spirit, treasured uj) in Emmanuel, could not but be abundantly sufficient for the purpose of restor- ing God's temple ; and have also shown, that his fulness of righteousness was in order to the remission of sin, as well necessary, as sufficient, to the same purpose ; so it remains further to be shown, that his fulness of Spirit, as it was sufficient, so is the emission or immission of it also necessary, for that part it was to have in this restoration. And that the whole course of Divine dispensation, in re- storing of this temjile, imports a steady comportment with this necessity in both the mentioned kinds of it. There- fore, the Emmanuel being the procurer of this restoration, as this may fitly be styled the temple of Christ, or of God in him: so the Spirit being the immediate actor herein, is also styled the temple of the Holy Ghost, aa we find in many texts of Scripture, Eph. ii. 20, 21. 1 Cor. iii. KJ. and vi. 19. 2 Cor. vi. 18, 19. 1 Peter ii. 4, 5. which the re^.der may consult at leisure. And they all show, how a tvcp)ovvToi. important and necessary a part the blessed Spirit hath in this merciful and glorious work. As withal, it being con- sidered what relation the Spirit bears to Christ, a.s he is Emmanuel and Mediator between God and man ; it evi- dently shows the necessity of his being constituted and made such, in order to the Spirit's part herein. V. God's own judgment is the surest measure to direct ours of what was necessary, in this case. And so far as the ground of his judgment is, by himself, made visible to us, we are neither to put out our own eyes, nor turn them away from beholding it. We arc to reckon it always safe and modest to follow him, by an ob.sequious, ductile judg- ment of things apparent, and which he offers to our view, or appeals to us about them. To go before him by a pre- ventive judgment of the secret things that belong to him, or pretend to give reasons, or an account of his matters, where he gives none himself, argues rashness, arrogance, and self-confidence, whereof we can give no account. But our judgment may be truly said to follow his, when he having in his word declared his choice of such a course, which he steadily pursues in his consequent dispensations; we thereupon conclude that course to be most fit, and that what he judged most fit, was to him (as formerly we have insisted) necessary. Therefore may we with just confi- dence undertake to show. That his declared, chosen, constant course of giving the Spirit, for restoring his temple with men, is to do it in and by Christ, or Emmanuel, the constituted Mediator between God and man. And that it was apparently reasonable and becoming of himself so to do. Whereby the necessity will appear, both of his giving the Spirit, for the restoring of his temple ; and of his set- tling the constitution of Emmanuel, or such a Mediator in order to the giving his Spirit. Only, before we proceed more distinctly to discourse these things, it seems requisite to consider and discuss a difficulty, which may give great amusement to the minds of many, viz. That since, by the drift and tendency of this discourse, it would appear, that the Son of God, Emmanuel, God with us, hath by his own dear purchase, a fulness of Spirit in him for this blessed work; and now hath it in his power to raise temples every where at his pleasure, That yet so great a part of the world is still desolate, full of idols' temples : yea, the \'isible temple of God full of idols, destitute of the Divine Spirit, under the poisonous influence of the prince of the poM-er of the air, the spirit that works in the hearts of the children of disobedience, Eph. ii. 2. and by an efficacious energy,'^ as the word there used emphatically signifies. For what hath that accursed spirit more power to destroy, than the Son of God manifested to dissolve and destroy the works of the devil, and his blessed Spirit hath to save 1 Some considerations tending to disamuse men's minds about this matter, may make way for our clearer and less interrupted progress in the following discourse. There- fore consider, VI. 1. That the raising up of temples to God in the souls of men, with the dispossessing of that wicked one, must by no means be understood to be the work of mere power; as if no other excellency of the Divine Being were concerned in it. Nor is it fit to say (as elsewhere is insisted) that God can do every thing that almightv power can do. Almighty power gives us not an adequate no- tion of God. He is every other excellency as well as power ; and can do nothing but what agrees with every other perfection of his nature, wisdom, justice, holiness, truth, &c. as well as his power. 2. The Son of God, Emmanuel, having obtained an in- finite fulness of power to reside in himself cannot be ex- pected to exert it to the utmost, as natural, unintelligent agents do ; but so far as is suitable to the proper ends of his undertaking, and the office which he bears. 3. It ought to be deeply considered, as a truth both of clearest evidence and great importance, (though perhaps it may have escaped the thoughts of many,) that the prin- cipal end of our Lord's undertaking and office, was not the salvation of men, but the glory of God. This is that whereupon his design did ultimately terminate. The 100 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part 11. other he coultl only intend secondarily, and as a means to this ; otherwise he should make the creature his chief end, and place upon it a most appropriate Divine prero- gative, to be the last, as he is the first, to all things ; which is said of the great God, in reference to this very case, the saving of some, and rejecting of others. In contempla- tion whereof, the apostle, crying out, O the depth ! asserts God's absolute liberty, as debtor to no man, (Rom. xi. 33, 34, 35.) and subjoins the true reason hereof. That of him, and by him, and to him, are all things, that to him might be glory, &c. This is the avowed design of our Lord Christ's office, in both his lowest humiliation, and highest exaltation. The desire of being saved from the (approach- ing) hour and power of darkness vanishes, and gives place to this, — Father, glorify thy name, John xii. 27, 28. When, for his obedience to death, that of the cross, he is highly exalted — all are to confess him Lord, to the praise and glory of God, Phil. ii. 8, 11. He, who is the most competent and most rightful Judge, determines when it will be more for the glory of God, to dispossess the strong man armed, being himself the stronger, and erect that house into a temple : and when it will most serve this his great end, to leave the strong man armed still in his possession, and finally to doom the possessor and the possessed to take their lot together. In the former case, there are vessels unto honour, framed by his own hand, to the praise of the glory of grace, Eph. i. 6. In the latter, vessels unto dis- honour, to glorify his power, by making known his wrath and just resentments. For that honourable purpose, none are of themselves fit ; but he makes them meet for that glorious slate, Col. i. 12. before he makes them partakers of it ; but none serve the dishonourable use, but who are, of themselves, vessels of wrath fitted for destruction, Rom. ix. 22. Our Lord was faithful as a Son ; and was there- fore content to die upon a cross, that he might, in a way against which the strictest justice should not reclaim, ob- tain to himself a power of giving an apostate world a time of trial ; and as men should acquit themselves, by com- plying or not complying with his methods, glorify the Father, whose glory he sought as being sent by him, and vindicate the rights of the Divine government, both in them that are " saved, and in them that perish." VII. 4. But it may gain us further advantage, to con- sider the great God doth not pursue ends, as we are wont to do, who commonly apprehend ourselves to stand in need of the things we pursue as our ends. But he acts agree- ably to his self-sufficient fulness, who dwells not in tem- ples made with hands, nor in any human temple, " as if he needed any thing, seeing he gives to all life and breath, and all things;" Acts xvii.25. and expects hereupon, men si nfiulo8 inhabitaro dignatur, non in omnibus, quam diffusion, nor more particular distribution, signifying him to be greater or less, in ail, in every one. He so takes care of all as of every one, and of evei7 one as if he were the only one under his care. Id. He is the first-born among many brethren ; and as that imports dignity, so it doth employment ; it being his part as such to provide for the good state of the family : which is all named from him, both that part in heaven, and that on earth, Eph. iii. 15. Yea, and he may in a true sense be styled the Pater- familids, the Fatker of the family : though to \\\& first in Godhead he is the Son, to us he is styled the everlasting Father, Isa. ix. 6. Therefore he is under obli- gation hereto, by his Father's appointment, and his own undertaking. And that which he hath obliged himself to, is to give the Holy Spirit, or take continual care that it be commu- nicated from time to time, as particular exigencies and occasions shall require. It was a thing full of wonder, that ever he should be so far concerned in our affairs ! But being concerned so deeply as we know he hath been ; to be incarnate for us ; to be made a sacrifice to God for us, that he might have it in his power to give the Spirit, having become a curse for us, that he might be capable of con- ferring upon us this blessing; 'tis now no wonder he should oblige himself to a continual constant care that his own great and kind design should now not be lost or miscarry. After he had engaged himself so deeply in this design for his redeemed, could he decline further obli- gation ? And his obligation creates their right, entitles them to this mighty gift of his own Spirit ; concerning which we shall consider — The dueness, and the greatness, or ampli- tude, of this Gift : or show, that, as their case is now stated, upon their regeneration, they have a pleadable right to this high privilege, the continued communication of the Spirit. And next show, of how large extent this privilege is, and how great things are contained in it. I scruple not to call it a Gift, and yet at the same time to assert their right to it, to whom it is given ; not doubting but every one will see, a right accruing by free-promise (as we shall show this doth) detracts nothing from the freeness of the gift. When the promise only, with what we shall see is directly consequent, produces or creates this right, it is unconceiv- able that this creature, by resulting naturally, should injure its own parent or productive cause. We shall therefore say somewhat briefly, II. 1. Of the dueness of this continued indwelling pre- sence of the blessed Spirit to the regenerate: (intending to speak more largely of the amplitude and extensiveness of it, on the account afterwards to be given :) And, (1.) It is due (as hath been intimated) by promise. It is expressly said lo be the promise of the Spirit, Gal. iii. 14. But to whoml To the regenerate, to them who are born after the Spirit, as may be seen at large, chap. iv. These (as it after follows) are the children and heirs of the promise, which must principally mean this promise, as it is eminently called. Acts ii. 38. "Repent," (which con- notes regeneration,) "and ye shall receive the Holy Ghost; for the promise is to you, &c. and lo as many as the Lord shall call :" which calling, when effectual, includes re- generation. When (Eph. i. 13.) this blessed Spirit is called the Spirit of promise, what can that mean but the promised Spirit 1 (2.) Their right is the more evident ; and what is pro- mised the more apparently due, in that the promise hath received the form of a covenant, whereby the covenanters have a more strongly pleadable right and claim ; to which the rest of men have no such pretence. It is true that we must distinguish of the covenant, — as proposed, and entered. The proposal of it is in very general terms, " Ho, every one that thirsts" — Isa. Iv. 1. " Incline your ear — and I will make an everlasting covenant with you" — v. 3. And so it gives a remotCj future right to such" as shall enter into it. But only they have a present actual right to what it con- tains, that have entered into it : and their plea is strong, having this to say; " I have not only an indefinite, or le.is determinate, promise to rely upon ; but a promise upon in singulis major. Quoniam nee mole diateiiditur, nee partitiooe minuitur. Aug. de Civ. Dei, lib. 18. cap. 45. Chap. XI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 107 terms expressed, which I have agreed to ; and there is now a mutual stipulation between God and me : He offered himself, and demanded me; I have accepted him, and given myself. And hereupon I humbly expect and claim all further needful communications of his Spirit, as the principal promised blessings of this covenant." Such a one may therefore say, as the Psalmist hath taught him. Remember thy word to thy servant, in which thou hast caused me to hope, Psal. cxix. 49. I had never looked for such quickening influences, if thou hadst not caused me, and been the Author to me of such an expectation. Now as thou hast quickened me by thy word, v. 50. so quickening me according to thy word. " I wiU put my Spirit within you," is a principal article of this covenant, Ezek. xxxvi. 27. And this expression of putting the Spirit within, must signify not a light touch upon the soul of a man, but to settle it as an the innermost centre of the soul, in order to a fixed abode. And how sacred is the bond of this covenant! it is founded in the blood of the Mediator of it. This is, as he himself speaks, the new testament (or covenant) in my blood, Luke xxii. 20. Therefore is this, in a varied phrase, said to be the "blood of the covenant;" and therefore is this covenant said to be everlasting, Heb. xiii. 20. referring to a known maxim among the Hebrews: Pacts, confirmed by blood, (^sanguine saucita,) can never be abolished. " The God of peace — by the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you perfect in every good work;" which must im- ply a continual communication of the Spirit- for it is also added, to do always what is well-pleasing in his sight ; which, who can do without iuch continual aids 2 "Coming to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, we come to the blood of sprinkling," Heb. xii. 24. He could not mediate for us upon other terms; and upon those, obtains for us the better promises, " spiritual blessings in heavenly things," Eph. i. 3. And further, this covenant is ratified by his oath who formed and made it. "My covenant will I not break — Once have I sworn," Ps. Ixxxix. 34, 35. By these two immutable things, (even to our apprehension,) 'tis impos- sible for God to lie, Heb. vi. 17, 18. Regeneration is the Duilding of this temple ; covenanting on our part contains the dedication of it ; and what then can follow btit con- stant possession and use 1 (3.) The regenerate, as such, are sons,bofh by receiving a new nature, even a divine, 2 Pet. i. 4. in their regenera- tion; and a new title, in (what is always conjunct) their adoption. Now, hereupon the continual supplies of the Spirit in this house (or temple') of his are the children's bread, Luke xi. 13. Because tney are sons, therefore God sends the Spirit of his Son into their hearts. Gal. iv. G. and he is styled the Spirit of adoption, Rom. viii. 14, 15. Therefore have a right to the provisions of their Father's house. (4.) The Spirit is given unto these children of God upon their faith ; which must certainlj' suppose their previous title for the ground of it. They receive " the promise of the Spirit by faith," (Gal. iii. 14.) as by faith they are God's children, v. 26. Receiving the Son, who was emi- nentlj' so, and to whom the sonship did primarily or origi- nally belong; and believing in his name, they thereupon have ^ power or right to become the sons of God, John i. 12. being herein also regenerate, born not of flesh and blood, — but of God. And thus, by faith receiving him, by faith they retain him, or have him abiding in them, as he abides in them: for the union is intimate and mutual, John XV. 5. They first receive him upon the gospel offer, which, as was said, gave them a remote right, and now re- tain him, as having an actual right. He dwells in the heart by faith, Eph. iii. 17. But what he doth, in this respect, his Spirit doth ; so he explains himself, when, in those valedictory chapters of St. John's gospel, xiv. xv. jcvi. he promises his disconsolate disciples, he would come to them, he would see them, he would manifest himself to them, he would abide with them, within a little while they should see him, &c. intimates to them, that heprinci- Eally meant all this of a presence to be vouchsafed them by is Spirit, cL xiv. v, 16, 17, 18, 19. And he concerns the b e^ov(Ttav. Father also with himself in the same .sort of commerce; (v. 20.) " At that day ye shall know that I am in my Fa- ther, and you in me, and 1 in you^" as also v. 21, and 23. Thus in another place, we find the Spirit promiscuously spoken of as the Spirit of God, and the Spirit of Christy and the inbeingor indwelling of Christ, and of the Spirit, used as expressions signifying the same thing; when also the operation of God is spoken of by the same indwelling Spirit, Rom. viii. 9,10, 11. Which an eminent father observing, intakes occasion to speak of the joint presence of the several persons of the Trinity, with such with whom any one is present, because each bears itself inseparably towards the other, and is unite/I most intimately therewith, v-ker€Soever one hypostasis (or peisons, as by the Latins we are taught to s]pea\<) is present, there tke v:hole Trinily is present — Amazing thing! that the glorious Suljsistents in the eternal Godhead, should so concentre in kind design, influence, and operation towards a despicable impure worm ! But this conjunction infers no confusion; breaks not the order, wherein each severally acts towards one end. But that, notwithstanding, we may conceive from whom, through whom, and by whom, what was lately a ruinous heap is become an animated temple, inhabited by the Di- vine presence, wherein we ought not to forget, how emi- nent and conspicuous the part is of our Lord Christ, and upon how costly terms he obtained, that the blessed Spirit should so statedly, and upon a right claimable by faith, employ his mighty agency in this most gracious and won- derful undertaking! being (as hath been observed) made a curse for us, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit by faith, Gal. iii. 13, 14. Whence also it is said, that after our believing we are sealed with the Spirit of promise ; (Eph. i. 13.) i. e. by that seal, by which God knows, or owns, or acknowledges, them that are hi-s, (2 Tim. ii. 19.) though they maj- not alwa3's know it themselves. Hereupon also our Lord hath assured us, from them that believe in him, shall flow (as out of the belly of a conduit) rivers of livmg water, -which it is said he spoke of the Spirit, which they that believed should receive, John vii. 37. Much more might be alleged from many texts of the Old and New Testament to evince the right which believ- ers, or they who are God's more peculiar people, have to the abiding indwelling presence of his Spirit, as the inha- bitant of that temple which they are now become. III. But that matter being plain, we shall proceed to what was next proposed ; to show, (2.) The ample extent and comprehensiveness of this privilege, which I shall the rather enlarge upon, that from thence we may have the clearer ground upon which after- wards to argue; — how highly reasonable and congruous was it, that so great a thing, and of so manifest importance to God's having a temple and residence among men, should not be otherwise communicated than in and b)- Emman- uel, the Founder and Restorer of this temple. And we cannot have a truer or surer measure of the amplitude and extensiveness of this gift, than the extent and comprehensiveness of the covenant itsell", to which it belongs. To which purpose, let it be considered that this covenant of God inChiist,of which we are now speaking, may be looked upon two ways ; i. e. We may view it abstractedly, taking the frame and mode) of it, as it were in adu signato, to be collected -and ga- tliered out of the Holy Scriptures. Or we may look irpou it as in adu cxercito, viz. as it is noir transacted and en- tered into by the blessed God, and this or that awakened, considering, predisptised soul. Now here, 1. Take it the former way, vj\A you find this article, concerning the gift or communication of the Holy Ghost ; standing there as one great grant contained in the gospel- covenant. And it is obvious to observe, as it is placed there, what aspect it hath upon both the parts of the cove- nant, I will be your God — )-ou shall be im People, Which will be seen, if, 2. You consider this covenant as actually ejiicred into, or as the covenanting parties are treating, the one lo draw, the other to enter, this covenant. And so we shall see that c Oifoii yap Tl fta T""?? rptaSos viros-aais TOf ij waoa xapc^iv n rpiat, Chmt. in Cpiit. ad Roman. 108 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. cnr consent, both that God shall be our God, and that we will be his people, with all previous inclinations thereto, and what immediately results from our covenanting, do all depend upon this communication of the Spirit ; and otherwise, neither can he do the part of a God to us, nor we, the part that belongs to his people towards him. By all which we shall see the va,st extent of the gift. It is the Mediator's part to bring the covenanting parties toge- ther. He is therefore said to be the Mediator of the new covenant, Heb. xii. 24. He rendered it possible, by the merit of his blood, that the offended Majesty of heaven might, without injury to himself, consent ; and that the Spirit might be given to procure our consent, which, as Mediator or Emmanuel, he gives. When he gives it in so copious an effusion, as to be victorious, to conquer our aversion, and make us cease to be rebellious, then he en- ters to dwell, Ps. Ixviii. 18. Till then, there is no actual covenanting ; no plenary consent on our part to what is proposed in the covenant, in either respect: we neither agree that God shall be our God, nor that we will be of his people. This speaks this gift a great thing and of vast extent, looking for the present upon the two parts of the covenant summarily; and afterwards considering what each part more particularly contains in it. But if in prac- tice it be so far done as is reguisite to a judicious and preponderating determination of will, (which may yet afterwards admit of higher degrees,) how great a thing is now done ! Their state is distinguished from theirs Who are strangers to the covenant, who are without Christ, and without God in the world. From hence results, 1. An express reconciliation between God and thee; for this is a league of friendship, enmity ceasing. 2. A fixed special relation : (Ezek. xvi. 8.) " I entered into covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou be- camest mine." How great and high a privilege ! Relations are said to be of minute entity, but great efficacy. All the Divine Being related to me a worm ! IV. And that all this may be the plainer, let us but consider, more distinctly, what the great summary of God's part of this covenant contains; what is the most principal promise of it; the dependence of our part there- on ; upon what terms that which is distinct is promised ; how far what is distinctly promised, is coincident with this gift of the indwelling S])irit, both in respect of this present, and the future eternal state. 1. The known and usual summary of this covenant, on God's part, is, " I will be their God;" as it is set douTi in many places of both Testaments. Now, what can be meant, more principally, by his being their God, than giv- ing ihem his indwelling Spirit 1 Wherein without it can he do the part of a God to them"? By it he both governs and satisfies them: is both their supreme and sovereign Lord, in the one regard, and their supreme and sovereign good, in the other. Doth being their God intend no more than an empty title? or, what would be their so great advantage, in having only a nominal God? Yea, and he is pleased himself to expound it of his continued gracious presence, (2 Cor. vi. 16.) "I will dwell in them, and walk m them, and I will be their God ;" alluding to his contin- uing his tabernacle among them, as is promised, Lev. xxvi. 11, 12. " I will set my tabernacle among you, and my soul shall not abhor you; and I will walk among you, and I will be your God," &c. And what did that tabernacle signify but this living temple, whereof we speak, as a certain type and shadow of ill Agreeably whereto his covenant is expressed, with evident reference to the days of the gospel, and the time of the Messiah's king- dom, (plainly meant by David's being their king and prince for ever,) Ezek. xxxvii. 24, 25, 26, 27. " David, my servant, shall be king over them," (spoken many an age after he was dead and gone,) — " and their prince for ever. Moreover, I will make a covenant of peace with them, it shall be an everlasting covenant with them, and I will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore. My tabernacle also shall be with them; yea, I will be their God." That yea, the exegetical note, is observable, "my sanctuary and tabernacle shall be with them." (i. c. " I wixl dwell in them," as it is expounded before, 2 Cor. vi. d Templum Dei tetlificatum per Testamentiun Novum lapidibus vii-is eloriosior quum illud quod a Rege Soloraone coiistmotum est, &c Aue do Civ. Cei. 1. 18. c. 4fl. ) *• 16. And could it be meant ol' an uninhabited, desolate sanctuaiy or tabernacle, that should be with them for ever- more ■?) And why is this his constant inhabiting presence to be with theml The emphatical yea, with what follows, informs us: Yea, I will be their God: q. d. I have under- taken to be their God, which I cannot make good unto them, if I afford them not my indwelling presence. To be to them a distant God, a God afar off", can neither answer my covenant, nor the exigency of their ca'se. They will but have a God, and no God, if they have not with them, and in them, a divine, vital, inspiriting, inactuating pre- sence, to govern, quicken, support, and satisfy them, and fill them with an all-sufficient fulness. They would soon, otherwise, be an habitation for Ziim and Ochim, or be the temple but of idol gods. It is therefore evident that this summary of God's part of his covenant, I will be their God, very principally in- tends his dwelling in them by his Spirit. V. And the restipulation, on their part, to be his people, (which is generally added in all the places, wherein the other part is expressed,) signifies their faith, by which they take hold of his covenant, accept him to be their God, dedicate themselves to be his people, his peculiar, his man- sion, his temple, wherein he may dwell. Now this their self-resigning faith, taken in its just latitude, carries with it a twofold reference to Him, as their sovereign Lord, as their sovereign Good ; whom, above all other, they are to obey and enjoy. But can they obey him, if he do not put his Spirit into them, to write his law in their hearts, and "cause them to walk in his statutes 1" Ezek. xxxvi. 27. Jer. li. 35. Or can they enjoy him, if they love him not as their best good 1 which love is the known fruit of his Spirit. Whereupon, after such self-resignation and dedication, what remains, but that "the house of the Lord be filled with the glory of the Lord?" as 2Chron. vii. 2. 2. Let us consider what is the express, more peculiar kind of the promises of this covenant, in the Christian contradistinct to the Mosaical administration of it. It is evident, in the general, that the promises of the gospel covenant are in their nature and kind, compared with those that belonged to the Mosaical dispensation, more spiritual; therefore called better promises, Heb. viii. 6. They are not promises of secular felicity, of external pros- perity, peace, and plenty, as those other most expressly vfevQ. It is true indeed that the covenant with Israel, with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and their seed, was not exclusive of spiritual good things. For the communica- tion of the Spirit was (as hath been noted) the blessing of Abraham, (Gal. iii. 14.) and that, as he was the father of that people, the head of a community, now lo he much more extended, and take in the Gentiles the time being come, when all nations were to be blessea in him, which is said to be the gospel that was preached to Abraham, Gal. iii. 8. But in the mean time, the Spirit was given less generally, and in a much lower measure ; wherefore, in that purposed comparison, 2 Cor. iii. between the legal and the evangelical dispensation; though a certain glory did attend the former, yet that glory is said to be no glory, in respect of the so much excelling glory of this latter, t;. 10. And the thing wherein it so highly excelled, was the much more copious effiision of the Spirit. That whereas, under the former dispensation, Moses was read for many ages, with little efficacy, a veil being upon the people's hearts, signified by the (mystical) veil wherewith, when he conversed with them, he was wont to cover his face; that comparative inefficacy proceeding from hence, that little of the light, life, and power of the Spirit accompanied that dispensation: now, under the gospel dispensation, the glory of the Lord wai; to be beheld as in a glass, with unveiled face, so as that, beholding it, we might be changed (so great an efficacy and power went with it) into the same likeness, from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord ; which is the scope of the latter part of that chapter, from v. 10 to 18. d How great was the splen- dour and magnificence of Solomon's temple, yet how much more glorious is that which is built of living stones I And as the whole frame of that former economy was always less spiritual, a lower measure of the Spirit always accom- Chap. XI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 109 panyingit; so -when it stood in competition, as corrival to the Christian dispensation, being hereupon quite de- serted bv the Spirit, it is spoken of as weak, worldly, car- nal, and" beggarly, Gal. iv. i). Col. ii. 20. Heb. ix. 2, 10. Therefore the apostle expostulates with the Galatian Chris- tians, verging towards Judaism; "Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith 1 Are ye so foolish, having begun in the Spirit, are you now made peifeet by ihe flesh ?" Gal. iii. 2, 3, and ch. iv. from V. 22 to 32. Speaking of the two covenants, under alle- gorical represcntaiion, he makes Ihe former, given upon Mount Sinai, to be signified by Agar the bondwoman, and by the terrestrial Jei-usalem, which was then in bond- age, with her children, as productive but of a servile race, born after the flesh only, as Ishmael was, destitute of the Divine Spirit ; (which where it is, there is liberty, 2 Cor. iii. 17.) the other by Sarah, a freexvoman, and by the celestial Jerusalem, which is free, with her children, all born from above, of the Divine Spirit; (John iii. 3, 5, as nvyhf there signifies;) which spiritual seed, signified by Isaac, are said at once to be born after the Spirit, and by promise, v. 23, 28, 29. And this can import no less than, that the ancient promise, (given long before the law, upon Mount Sinai, vi~. four hundred and thirty years. Gal. iv. 17, and expressly called the covenant of Gfod, in Christ : most eminently to be made good in the days of the gospel; after the cessation of the Mosaical institution, as it was made before it,) must principally mean the promise of the Spirit. Which is most plain from that of the apostle Peter to his convinced, heart-wounded hearers. Acts ii. 38, 39. " Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost ; for the promise is unto you, and j'our children, and to all that are afar ofl^," (this promise not being to be confined to them and their children, but to reach the Gentiles also, as Gal. iii. 14.) " even as many as the Lord our God shall call." And surely that which is, by way of excellency, called the promise, must be the more principal promise of this cove- nant ; which it is also signified to be, in that account given of it by the prophets, Isa. xliv. 3. and lix. 20, 21. Jer. ixxi. 33. quoted Heb. viii. 10. (where though the Spirit be not expressly named, yet those eflfecls of it are, which manifestly suppose it,) and Ezek. xxxvi. 25, 27. Joel ii. 28. This new coveirant is distinguished from the former, by the more certain, more general, and more efficacious communication of the Spirit promised in it, as is plainly implied, Jer. xxxi. and (^which refers thereto) Heb. viii. 9, 10, 11. VI. 3. It will further tend to evidence, that the Spirit is given as a settled Inhabitant, upon the known terms of this covenant : if we consider upon what terms it is pro- mised, what is distinctly but however most conjunctly promised therewith, viz. all the relative graces of justifi- cation, pardon of sin, and adoption. These are promised, as is apparent, in the same covenant, and upon laith, which is our taking hold of and entering into the cove- nant, our accepting God in Christ to be our God, and giv- ing up ourselves to be his people ; and is (according to that latitude, wherein faith is commonly taken) inclusive of repentance. For a sinner, one before in a state of apostacy from God, cannot take him to be his God, but in so doing he must exercise repentance to\x ards God. His very act of taking him, in Christ, is turning to him through Christ, from the sin by which he had departed and apostatized from him before. Therefore must the indwelling Spirit be given, upon the same certain and known terms as is also expressed in (the before-mentioned) Gal. iii. M. Eph. i. 13, &c. Acts ii. 38, 39. 4. Now faith and repentance being first given in forming God's temple, consider, how coincident the gift of the Spirit, is an Inhabitant, is with remission of sin, or with whatsoever relative grace as such, is distinct from that which is inherent, subjected in the soul it.self, and really transmutative of its subject. But we are to consider with- al, how manifestly the latter of the.se is involved in the former. Giving the Spirit (the root and original of sub- jective grace) implies two things: 1. Conferring a right to it: 2. Actual communication, The former belongs to relative grace, the latter to real; (as they commonly dis- tinguish :) but the former is in order to ihc latter, and the lattermost certainly follows upon the former. Both are signified by one name of giving ; and do both, in a sort, make one entire legal act, (though there are distinct physi- cal ones,) which the former (usually) begins, and the latter consummates. Divers things are not herein given, but only a title to, and the possession of, the same thing: nor by divers donations; but by the concurrence of such things as are requisite to make up one and the same. VII. And let it now be considered. What there is pro- mised in the gospel-covenant, besides what may be com- prehended in the gift of the Spirit. We will first set a.side what is manifestly not promised in it besides ; and then, more closely inquire about what may seem distinctly pro- mised, and see in how great part that residue will be re- ducible hither. 1. As to what is manifestly not promised besides ; it is plain, there is not promised in it a part and portion in a particular land or country on earth, as there was in the old covenant (contra-distinguished to this new one) to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and their seed, which land was, we know, called the " land of promise ;" and unto which the body of that people had so certain a title, upon the condition of their continued obedience, that they were sure never to be removed out of it; or if they had made a general defection, and were thereupon forsaken of God, and given up to invading enemies, that should dispossess them, they were as sure, upon their general repentance, to be restored, and settled there again ; as may be seen in Solomon's pra3'er, at the dedication of the temple, and God's most gracious and particular answer thereto, and in divers places of the Old Testament besides. If particular persons brake this covenant, by grosser transgressions, they were to be cut off from this good land, and, by Moses's law, at the mouth of two or three wit- nesses, to die without mere)'; and so, by such execution of justice, the bodj'^ of the people was kept safe from Divine displeasure ; the land was not defiled, so as to spew out its inhabitants. But if the people did generally revolt, so as that the ordinary methods of punitive justice could have no place, God took the matter into his own hands, and did justice upon them himself, by casting them out. This is the covenant Vvhich, it is said, they brake, Jer. xxxi. and Heb. viii. The new gospel covenant is apparently of no such import, or hath no such additament to the spiritual bless- ings of it. Nor again doth it promise, more indefinitely, temporal blessings of any kind, with certainty, upon any condition whatsoever, even of the highest faith, the most fervent love to God, or the most accurate obedience, and irreprehen- sibje sanctity, attainable on earth ; as if the best and holiest men should therefore be any whit the more assured of constant health, ease, opulency, or peace in this world. We know the ordinary course of providence (which can- not justly be understood to be a misinterpreter of God's covenant) runs much otherwise; and that such things as concern the good estate of our spirits, and inward man, are the only things we can, upon any terms, be sure of, by this covenant ; the tenor of it not warranting us to look upon external good things, as otherwise promised, than so far as they may be subservient to these, and to our better serving the interest and honour of God and the Redeemer; of which things he reserves the juderment to himself And unto Him, by this covenant, we absolutely devote our- selves to serve and glorify him in his own way. and in whatsoever external circumstances his wisdom and good pleasure shall order for us; being ourselves only assured of this in the general, That all things shall work together for good to us, if we love him, &c. but still esteeming it our highest good (as we cannot but do, if we love him as we ought) to be most serviceable to his glory, and conform- able, in our habitual temper, to his will. Spiritual good things, then, are by the tenor of this covenant our only certainties, Other things indeed cannot be the matter of absolute universal promise. Their nature refuses it and makes them incapable. They are but of a mutable good- ness ; may be sometimes, in reference to our great end, good for us ; and sometimes, or in some circumstances, evil and prejudicial. And being in a possibilitj' to become no THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II, evil in that relative sense, (as what hinders a greater good, is then an evil,) if they ever be actually so; tiiey are then no longer matter of a promise. The promise would in that case cease to be a, promise; for can there be a promise of an evill It would then necessarily degenerate, and turn Liito a threatening. VIII. But it may be said of those good things that are of a higher kind and nature, that respect our souls and our states Godward, there seem to be some vastly difi'erent from this of giving the Spirit. Therefore, 2. We are next to inquire what they are, and how far they may be found to fall into this. Remission of sin is most obvious, and comes first in view, upon this account. And let us bethink ourselves what it is. We will take it for granted, that it is not a mere concealed will or purpose to pardon, on the one hand, (for no one in common speech takes it so ; a purpose to do a thing signifies it not yet to be done,) nor mere not punishing, on the other. If one should be never so long only forborne, and not punished, he ma}' j-et be still punishable, and will be always so, if he be yet guilty. It 's therefore such an act as doth, in law, take away guik, iz. the reatuvi fana, or dissolve the obligation to sitffcr punishment. It is therefore to be considered, what punishment a sin- ner was, by the violated law of works and nature, liable to in this world, or in the world to come; and then what of this, is, by virtue of the Redeemer's sacrifice and cove- nant, remitted. He was liable to whatsoever mi.series in this life God should please to inflict; to temporal death, and to a state of misery hereafter, all comprehended in this threatening, " Thou shalt die the death ;" if we will take following scriptures and providences for a commen- tary upon it. Now the miseries to which the sinner was liable in this world, were either external, or internal. Those of I lie former sort, the best men still remain liable to. Those of the inner man were certainly the greater, boih in them- selves, and in their lendencj' and consequence; especially such as stand in the ill dispositi-ons of men's minds and spirits Godward, unapprehensiveness of him, alienation from him, willingness to be as without him in the world. For that the spirits of men should be thus disaffected, and in this averse posture towards God, in whomonl)'^ it could be possible for them to be happy, how^ could it but be most pernicious to them, and virtually comprehensive of the worst miseries'? And M'hence came these evils to fall into the reasonable, intelligent spirit of man ? Was it by God's infusion 1 Abhorred be that black thought ! Nor could it be, if they were not forsaken of God, and the holj^ light and influence of his Spirit were not withheld. But is more evil inflicted upon men than either the threatening or the sentence of the law contained 1 That were to say, he is punished above legal desert, and beyond what it duly belonged to him to suffer. Experience shows this to be the common case of men. And had that threatening and sentence concerned Adam only, and not his poste- rity, how come they to be mortal, and otherwise externally miserable in this world, as well as he 1 But how plainly is the matter put out of doubt, that the suspension of the Spirit is part (and it cannot but be the most eminent part) of the curse of the law, hj that of the apostle, " Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us, that this blessing — might come upon us," (even the Gentiles, as well as Abraham's seed,) " that we might receive the promise of the Spirit," Gal. iii. 13, 14. But now what is there of all the misery duly incumbent upon man in this world, by the constitution of that law of works and nature, remitted and taken off by virtue of the covenant or law of grace or faith, from them that have taken hold of it, or entered into it 1 Who dare say, God doth not keep covenant with them 1 And we find they die as well as other men ; and are as much subject to the many inconveniences and grievances of human life. And it is not worth the while fo talk of the mere notion, under which they suffer them. It is evident that God doth them no wrong, in letting them be their lot ; and therefore that as they were, by the law of nature, deserved, so God hath not obliged himself, by the covenant or law of grace, to lake or keep them off; for then surely he had kept his word. That he hath obliged himself to do that which is more, and a greater thmg, to bless and sanctify them to their advantage and gain, in higher respects, is plain and out of question ; which serves our present purpose, and crosses it not. For upon the whole, that which remains the actual mat- ter of remission, in this world, is whatsoever of those spi- ritual evils would be necessarily consequent upon the total restraint, and wiihholdingof the Spirit. And that this is the remission of sin in this life, which the Scripture intends, is plain from divers express places, Acts ii. 37, 38. When the apostle Peter's heart-pierced hearers cry out, in their distress, "What shall we do'?" he directs them thus : " Repent, and be baptized, every one of you, for the remission of sins, and ye shall (he adds) receive the Holy Ghost ; for the promise is to you, and your children;" q. d. " The great promise of the gospel- covenant, is that of the gift of the Holy Ghost. It doth not promise you worldly wealth, or ease, or riches, or ho- nours; but it promises you that God will be no longer a stranger to you, refuse your converse, withhold his Spirit from you ; your souls shall lie no longer waste and deso- late. But as he hath mercifully approached your spirits, to make them habitable, and fit to receive so great and so holy an intimate, and to your reception whereof, nothing but unremitted sin could be any obstruction ; as, upon y(5ur closing with the terms of the gospel-covenant, by a sincere believing intuition towards him whom you have pierced, and resolving to become Christians, whereof your being baptized, and therein taking on Christ's badge and cognizance, will be the fii and enjoined sign and token, and by which federal rite, remission of sin shall be openly con- firmed, and solemnly sealed unto 5'ou; so by that remis- sion of sin the bar is removed, and nothing can hinder the Holy Ghost from entering to take possession of your souls as his own temple and dwelling-place." We are by the way to take notice, that this fulfilling of tiie terms of the gospel-covenant is. aptly enough, in great part, here expressed by the word 7'c;7C7;<2wcc; most com- monly it is by that oi faith. It might as fitly be signified by the former in this place, if you consider the tenor of the foregoing discourse, rf.2r. that it remonstrated to them their great wickedness in crucifying Christ as a malefactor and impostor, whom they'ough* to have believed in as a Sa- viour; now to repent of this, was to believe., which yet is more fully expressed by that which follows ; and be bap- tized in (or rather into) the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is in the whole plain, that their reception of the Holy Ghost, as a Dweller, sinnds in close connexion, as an immediate consequent, with their having their sins ac- tually remitted, and that, with their repenting their former lefusing of Christ as the Messiah, their now becoming Christians, or taking on Christ's name, whereof their being baptized was to be only the sign, and the solemnization of their entrance into the Christian state, and by conse- quence, a visible confirmation of remission of sin to them. Irhey are therefore directed to be baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, i-i tm oi/ii/mri, or unto a covenant- surrender of themselves to Christ, whereof their baptism was, it is true, to be the signifying token for the remission of sins; which remission therefore must be understood con- nected, not with the sign but with the thing which it signi- fied. And it was only a more explicit repentance of their former infidelity, and a more explicit faith, which the apostle now exhorts them to, the inchoation whereof he might already' perceive, by their concerned question, " What shall we do'?" intimating their willingness to do any thing that they ought; that their hearts were already overcome and won ; and that the Holy Ghost had conse- quently began to enter upon them : the manifestation of whose entrance is elsewhere, as to persons adult, found to bean antecedent requisite to baptism, and made the argu- ment why it should not be withheld, as Acts x. 47. " Can any man forbid that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Ghost, as well as we'?" Rcvtission of sin, therefore, as it signifies giving a right to future impimity, signifies giving a right to the participa- tion of the Spirit; the withholding whereof was the prin- cipal punishment to be taken off. And as it signifies the actual taking off of that punishment, it must connote the Chap. XI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. Ill actual communicalion of the Spirit. Therefore, upon Uiat faith which is our entrance into the gospel-covenant, the curse which withheld the Spirit is removed, and so we receive the promise of the Spirit (or the promised Spirit) by faith ; as is plain in that before mentioned, Gal. iii. 13, 14. The same reference of giving (or continuing) the Spirit imto forgiveness of sin, we may observe in that of the Psalmist: " Hide thy face from iny sins, and blot out all mine iniquities. Creaie in me a clean heart, and renew a right Spirit within me. Cast me not away from thy presence, and take not thy Holy Spirit from me;" (Ps. li. 9, 10, 11.) which it is plain was dreaded and deprecated as the worst of evils; but which would be kept off, if ini- quity were blotted out. And as to this, there was no more difference in the case, than between one whose state was to be renewed, and one with whom God was first to begin. And that summar)^ of spiritual blessings promised in the new covenant. Jar. xxxi. 31, 32, &,c. and Heb. viii. which all suppose the promised gift of the Spirit itself, as the root of them all — " I vrill put my law in their inward parts, and will write it in their hearts," &c. is all grounded upon this : " For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." When therefore the punish- ment of sin is remitted, quoad jus, or a right is granted to impunity, the Spirit is, de jure, given; or a right is confer- red unto this sacred gift. When actually (upon that right granted) the punishment is taken off, the Spirit is actually given ; the withholding whereof was the principal punish- ment we were liable to, in this present state. IX. And as io justification, \he. case cannot differ, which itself so little differs from pardon, that the same act is par- don, being done by God as a sovereign Ruler acting above hiw, viz. the law of works ; and justification, being done by him a.s sustaming the person of a judge according to law, viz. the law of grace. Adoption also imports the privilege conferred of being the sons of God. And what is that privilege 1 (for it is more than a name ;) that such are led by the Spirit of God : (Rom. viii. 14.) which Spirit is therefore, as the peculiar cognizance of the state, called the Spirit of adoption, {v. 15.) and forms theirs suitably thereto: for it was not fit the sons of God should have the spirits of slaves. 'Tis not the .spirit of bondage that is given them, as there it is expressed, but a free generous spirit; not of fear, as there, and 2 Tim. i. 7. but of love and power, and of a sound mind. Most express is that parallel text, Gal. iv. Because they are sons, he hath sent the Spirit of his Son into their hearts, that enables them (as also Rom. viii. 16. speaks) to say, Abba, Father, makes them understand their state, whose sons they are, and who is their Fatlier, and reallv implants in them all filial di<;positions and affections Wherefore it is most evident that the relative srrace of the covenant only gives a right to the real grace of it ; and that the real grace communira'ed in this life, is all com- prehended in the gift of the Spirit, even that which flows in the external dispensations of Providence, not excepted. For as outward good things, or immunity from outward afflictions, are not promised in this new covenant, further than as they shall be truly and spiritually good for us; but we are, by the tenor of it, left to the suffering of very sharp afflictions, and the loss or want of all worldlv com- forts, with assurance that will turn to our srreater spiritual advantage; so the grace and sanctifying: influence, that shall make them do so, is all from the same Fountain, the issue of the same blessed Spirit. We only add, that eter- nal life in the close of all depends upon it, not only as the man}' things alreadv mentioned do so, that are necessary to it, but as it signified to be itself the immediate perpetual spring thereof. Thev that sow to the Spirit, shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. Gal. vi. 8. And how plainlv hath our blessed Lord signified the vast extent of this gift. when by good things in general, Matt. vii. 11. he lets us know he means the Holy Spirit, Luke xi. 13. We therefore see, that this great gift of the Holy Ghost is vouchsafed entirely upon the Redeemer's account, and by the authority of his office, for the buildins and inhahitins the desolated temple of God with men: for the rebuild- ing of it ; by that plenipotency, or absolute fulness of power, whicH, by the sacrifice of himself, he hath obtained should be in him: for the re-inhabiting of it, by virtue, and accordingto the tenor, of that covenant, now .solemnly entered; and which was established and ratified in the blood of that same Sacrifice. Wherein appears the due- ne.ss of it to the regenerate ; or that they have a real right to it, who are born of the Spirit; and have also seen the large amplitude and vast comprehensiveness of this gift. We therefore proceed to what was, in the next place, pro- mised, and wherein, after what hath been said, there will need little enlargement, i. e. X. 2. To give an account, (as was proposed in ch. ix sect, vii.) How highly reasonable it was trie Holy Spirit of God should not be vouchsafed for these purposes, upon other terms. And this we shall see, 1. By mentioning briefly, .what we have been showing all this while — The xast e.rtent and amplitude of this gift. Let it be remembered that the most considerable part of the penalty and curse incurred by the apostacy, was the withholding of the Spirit; from which curse in the whole of it Christ was to redeem us, by being made a curse for us. By the same curse, also, our title to many other benefits ceased and was lost, and many other mi- series were inferred upon it. But this one of being de- prived of the Spirit did so far surmount all the rest, that nothing" else was thought worth the naming with it, when the curse of the law, and Christ's redemption of us from. it, are so designedly spoken of together. If only lessei penalties Avere to have been remitted, or favours conferred of an inferior kind, a recompense to the violated law and justice of God, and the affronted majesty of his govern- ment, had been less necessarily insisted on. But that the greatest thing imaginable should be vouchsafed upon so easy terms; and without a testified resentment of the in- jury done by ruining his former temple, was never to be expected. JN'othing was more becoming or wortliy of God, than when man's revolt from him so manifestly implied an insolent conceit of his self-sufliciency, and that lie could subsist and be happy alone, he should presently withhold his Spirit, and leave hiiu to sink into that carnalitv which involved the fulness of death and misery in it. ("To be carnallv minded is death.") It belonged to the majesty and grandeur of the Deity, it was a part of Godlike state and greatness, to retire and become reserved, to reciude himself, and shut up his holy cheering influences and communications from a haughty miscreant; that it might try and feel what a sort of god it could be to itself: but to return; the state of the case being unaltered and every way the same as when he withdrew, no reparation being made, no atonement offered, had been, instead of judging his offending creature, to have judged himself, to rescind his own sentence as if it had been unjust; to tear his act and deed as if it had been the product of a ra.sh and hasty passion, not of mature and wise counsel and judgment; the indecencv and unbecomingness whereof had been the greater and the more conspicuous, by how much the greater and more peculiar favour it was to restore his gracious presence, or (which is all one) the influences of his Holy Spirit. Further consider, 2. That since nothing was more necessary for the restitu- tion of God's temple, it had been .strange if, in the consti- tution of Emmanuel for this purpose, this had been omitted: for it is plain that without it things could never have come to anv better state and posture between God and man ; God must liave let him he at the same distance, without givinsf him his Spirit. Neither could he honourably converse with man ; nor man possibly converse with him. Man would ever have borne towards God an implacable heart. And whereas it is acknowledged, on all hands, his repentance at least was necessary both on God's account and his own, that God might be reconciled to him, who without intolerable diminution to himself, could never otherwise have shown him favour. He had always carried about him the ^.ip.'i'.ii' (iusrajifX/jr.n, the h':art that could not repent. The " carnal mind," which is " enmity against God," is neither subject to him nor can be, had remained in full power; there had never been any stooping or yield- ing on man's part. And there had remained, besides, all manner of impurities : fleshlv lusts had retained the throne ; the soul of man had continued a cage of every noisome and hateful thing, the most unfit in all the wo- Id 112 THE LIVING TEMPLE. Part II. to have been the temple of the holy blessed God. It had neither stood with his majesty to have favoured an impe- nitent, nor with his holiness to have favoured so impure, a creature. Therefore, without the giving of his Spirit to mollify and purily the spirits of men, his honour in such a reconciliation had never been salved. And take the case as it must stand on man's part, his happiness had remained impossible. He could never have conversed with God, or taken complacency in him, to whom he had continued everlastingly unsuitable and dis- aflected. No valuable end could have been attained, that it was either fit God should have designed for himself, or was necessary to have been effected for man. In short, there could have been no temple : God could never have dwelt with man; man would never have received him to dwell. 3. But it is evident this was not omitted in the constitu- tion of Emmarruel. It being provided and procured by his dear expense, that he should have in him a fulness of Spirit : not merely as God ; for so in reference to offend- ing creatures it had been enclosed : but as Emmanuel, as a Mediator, a dying Redeemer; for only by such a one, or by him as such, it could be communicated ; so was there a sufficiency for this purpose of restoring God's tem- ple. And why was he in this way to become sufficient, if afterwards he might have been waived, neglected, and the same work have been done another way? 4. It could only be done this way, in and by Emmanuel. As such, he had both the natural and moral power in con- junction, which were necessary to effect it. (I.) The luitural power of Deity which was in him, was only competent for this purpose. Herein had he the ad- vantage infinitely of all human power and greatness. If an offended secular prince had never so great a mind to save and restore a condemned favourite, who besides that he is of so haughty a pride, and so hardened in his enmity, that he had rather die than supplicate, hath contracted all other vicious inclinations, is become infinitely immoral, debauched, unjust, dishonest, false, and we will suppose stupid, and bereft of the sprightly wit that graced his for- mer conversation ; his merciful prince would fain preserve and enjoy him as before; but he cannot change his quali- ties, and cannot but be ashamed to converse familiarly with him, while they remain unchanged. Now the blessed Emmanuel, as he is God, can, by giving his Spirit, do all his pleasure in such a case. And he hath as such too, (2.) The moral po^ver of doing it most righteously and becomingly of God, i. e. upon consideration of that great and noble sacrifice, which as such he offered up. He is now enabled lo give the Spirit : he might otherwise do any thing for man rather than this : for it imports the greatest intimacy imaginable. All external overtures and expressions of kindness, were nothing in comparison of it. And no previous disposition towards it, nothing of com- pliance on the sinner's part, no self-purifying, no self- loathing for former impurities, no smiting on the thigh, or saying, " What have I done," could be supposed antece- dent to this communication of the Spirit. The universe can afford no like case, between an offending wretch, and an affronted ruler. If the greatest prince on earth had been never so contumeliously abused by the most abject peasant; the distances are infinitely .ess, than between the injured glorious Majesty of heaven, ami the guilty sinner ; the injury done this majesty incomprehensibly greater. And besides all other differences in the two cases, there is this most important one, as may be collected from what hath been so largely discoursed, that the principal thing in the sentence and curse upon apostate man, was, That God's Spirit should retire and be withheld, so that he should converse with him, by if, no more. The condemn- ing sentence upon a criminal, doth in secular governments extend to life and estate; such a one might be pardoned as to both, and held ever at a distance. If before he were a favourite, he may still remain discourted. Familiar con- verse with his prince, was ever a thing to which he could lay no legal claim, but was always a thing of free and arbitrary favour. But suppose, in this case of delinquency, the law and his sentence did forbid it for ever; and sup- pose we that vile insolent peasant, before under obligation to his prince, for his daily livelihood and subsistence, now under condemnation for most opprobrious affronts and ma- licious attempts against him ; he relents not, scorns mercy, defies justice ; his compassionate prince rushes, notwith- standing, into his embraces, takes him into his cabinet, shuts himself up with hiin in secret: but all this while, though by what he does he debases himself, beyond all expectation of decency ; the principal thing is still want- ing, he cannot alter his disposition. If he could give him a truly right mind, it were better than all the riches of the Indies. This greatest instance of condescension he can- not reach, if he never so gladly would. It is not in his power, even when he joins bosoms, to mingle spirits with him ; and so must leave him as incapable of his most va- luable end, as he found him. In the present case, what was in itself so necessary to the intended end, was only possible to Emmanuel ; Avho herein becomes most intimate to us, and in the fullest sense admits to be so called ; and was therefore necessary to be done by him : unless his so rich sufficiency, and the end itself, should be lost together. XI. Thus far we have been considering the temple of God individually taken as each man, once become sin- cerely good and pious, renewed, united with Emmanuel, i. e. with God in Christ, and animated by the Spirit, may be himself a single temple to the most high God. I might now pass on to treat of the external state of the Christian church, and of the whole community of Christians, who collectively taken, and built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief Corner-stone, in whom fitly fiamed and builded together, they grow unto an holy temple in the Lord; and are in this compacted state a habitation of God, through the Spirit. Eph. ii. 20. But this larger subject, the outer-court of this temple, is, I find, beset and overspread with scratching briers and thorns. And for the sacred structure itself, though other foundation none can lay, than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ, 1 Cor. iii. II, &c. yet some are for superstructing one thing, some another; some gold, silver, precious stones ; others wood, hay, stubble. I am, for my part, content, that every man's work be made manifest, when the day shall declare it. Great differences there have long been, and still are, about setting up (the Trrrpi'yia) the pinnacles, and adjoining certain appendicles, which some have thought may inno- cently and becomingly belong to it. And very different sentiments there have been about modifying the services of it. Some too are for garnishing and adorning it one way, some another. And too many agitate these little differences, with so contentious heats and angers, as to evaporate the inward spirit and life, and hazard the con- sumption of the holy fabric itself. Ill-willers look on with pleasure, and do hope the violent convulsions which they behold, will tear the whole frame in pieces, and say in their hearts, " Down with it even to the ground." But it is built on a rock, against which the gates of hell can never prevail ! It ought not to be doubted, but that there yet will be a time of so copious an effusion of the Holy Spirit, as will invigorate it afresh, and make it spring up out of its maci- lent withered state, into its primitive liveliness and beauty; when it shall, according to the intended .spiritual meaning, resemble the external splendour of its ancient figure, Sion, the perfection of beauty; and arise and shine, the glory of the Lord being risen upon it. But if before that time there be a day that shall burn as an oven and make the hemisphere as one fiery vault; a day wherein the jealous God shall plead against the Christian church for its lukewarmness and scandalous coldness in the matter of serious substantial religion; and no less scandalous heats and fervours about trivial formalities, with just in- dignation, and flames of consuming fire, then will the straw and stubble be burnt up; and such as were sincere, though too intent upon such little trifles, be saved, yet so as through fire. A twofold effusion we may expect, of the wrath, and of the Spirit of God. The former to vindicate himself; the other to reform us. Then will this temple no more be termed forsaken; it will be actually, and in fact, what in Chap. XI. THE LIVING TEMPLE. 113 right it is always, " Bethel, The house of God, and the gate of heaven." Till then, little prosperity i.s to be hoped for in the Christian church ; spiritnal, -without a large communiiation of the Spirit, it cannot ^ave ; exter- nal {\vnho\\l it) it cannot 6m/-. It was a noted " pagan's observation and experiment, How incapable a n-cak inind is of a prosperous state. In heaven there will be no need of afflictions : on earth, the distempers of men's minds do both need and cause ihem. The pride, avarice, envyings, self-conceitedness, abounding each in their own sense, minding every one their own things, without regard to those of another, a haughty confidence of being always in the right, with contempt and hard censures of them that differ, spurning at the royal law of doing as one would be done to, of bearing with others as one would be borne with ; evil surmisings, the imperiousness of some, and peevishness of others, to be found among them that bear the Christian name, will not let the church, the house of God, be in peace, and deserve that it should not ; but that he should let them alone to punish themselves and one another. But the nearer we approach, on earth, to the heavenly state, which only a more copious and general pouring forth of the blessed Spirit will infer, the more capable we shall be of imcard and outward prosperity both together. Then will our differences vanish of course. The external pompousness of the church will be less studied, the life and spirit of it much more ; and if I may express my o\\ti sense, as to this matter, it should be in the words of that f worthy ancient, viz. That supposing the option or choice were left me, I would choose to have lived in a time when the temples were less adorned with all sorts of marbles, the church not being destitute of .spiritual graces. In the mean time, till those happier days come, wherein Chris- tians shall be of one heart and one way, happy are they that can attain so far to bear one another's yet remaining differences. And since it is impossible for all to Avorship together within the walls of the same material temple, that they choose ordinarily to do it, where they observe the nearest approach to God's own rule and pattern ; and where, upon experience, they find most of spiritual advan- tage and edification, not despising, much less paganizing, those that are built with them upon the same foundation, because of circumstantial disagreements; nor making mere circumstances, not prescribed by Christ himself the measures and boundaries of Christian communion, or any thing else that Christ hath not made so : that abhor to say (exclusively) Christ is here, or there, so as to deny him to be any where else; or to confine his presence to this or that party ; or to a temple so or so modified, by no direc- tion fjom himself Or if any, through mistake, or the pre- judices of education and converse, 1 e of narrower minds, and will refuse our communion, unless we will embrace theirs upon such terms as to abandon the communion of all other Christians, that are upon the same bottom with ourselves and them; that even as to them we retain a charitable hope, that our blessed Lord will not therefore exclude them ; because, through their too intense zeal for the little things, whereof they have made their partition- wall, they exclude us. If again, we be not too positive, or too prone to dispute about those minute matters that have been controverted bj"- the most judicious and sincere ser- vants of our Lord, on the one hand, and the other, in former days, and with little effect; as if we understood more than any of them, had engrossed all knoAvledge,and wisdom were to die with us ! and that with our bolt, too suddenly shot, we could out-shoot all others that ever had e Infirmi est animi, non posse pati di\itias. Sen. gone before us : if our minds be well furnished with hu- mility, meekness, modesty, sincerity, love to God. and his Christ, and our brethren, no otherwise distinguished, than by their visible avowed relation to him, this will constitute us such temples, as whereunto the blessed God will never refuse his presence. And do more to keep the Christian church in a tolerable good state, till the wa^iyycffo-ia, the times of restitution, come, than the most fervent disputa- tions ever can. And so I shall take leave of this subject, in hope that, through the blessing of God, it may be of use to some that shall allow themselves to read and consider it ; request- ing only.'^uch as are weary of living as without God in the world, that they defer not to invite, and admit the Dii'ine presence, till they see all agreed about every little thing that belongs to his temple, or that may be thought to be- long to it, but resolve upon what is plain and great, and ■which all that are serious, that have any regard to God, or their own everlasting well-being, cannot but agree in, i. e. forthwith to " lift up the evei lasting doors, that the King of glory may come in." Do it without delay, or disputa- tion. Let others dispute little punctilios with one another as they please ; but do not you dispute this grand point with him. Look to Emmanuel ; consider him in the several capacities, and in all the accomplishments, per- formances, acquisitions, by which he is so admirably fitted to bring it about, that God may have his temple iii your breast. Will you defeat so kind and so glorious a design 1 Behold, or listen, doih he not stand at the door, and knock 1 Rev. iii. 20. Consider, as exemplary, the temper of the royal Psalmist, how he sware — how he vowed — I will not come into the tabernacle of my house, nor go up into my bed; I will not give sleep to my eyes, nor slumber to my eye-lids, till I have found out a place for the Lord, a habitation for the mighty God ! Ps. cxxxii. Yours is a business of less in- quisition, less expense ! His temple is to be within j-ou. Lament, O bitterly lament the common case, that he may look through a whole world of intelligent creatures, and find every breast, till he open, shut up against him ' All agreeing to exclude their most gracious rightful Lord, choosing rather to live desolate without him ! The preparation, or prepared mansion, is a penitent, purged, willing heart ! Fall down and adore this most admirable and condescending grace; that the high anil lofty One, who inhabits eternity, who having made a world, and surveying the work of his own hands, inquires, " Where shall he my house, and the place of my rest 1" and thus resolves it himself: " The humble, broken, con- trite heart! there, there I will dwell !" If you have such a temple for him, dedicate it. Make haste to do so: doubt not its suitableness. 'Tis his own choice, his own workmanship; the regeneiate new crea- ture. He himself, as Emmanuel, hath procured and pre- pared it, knowing what would be mo.st grateful, most agreeable to him: to the most exalted Majesty; the most profound, humble self-abasement. Upon this consum- mative act, the dedicating of this temple, I might here fitly enlarge; but having published a discourse already some years ago, under the title of Self-dedication ; (which you ma}' either find annexed to this, or have apart by itself, at your own choice;) thither I refer j-ou. And because this must be a livin? temple ; there is also another extant, upon these words : Yield ymirsclres to God. as those that are alive frovi the dead. That also, such as are inclined may. through God's gracious assistiug influence, with eyes lift up to heaven, peruse unto some advantage. f aipcaii ftoi. Isidor. Telus. L. 2. Ep. 23«. THE RECONCILEABLENESS OF GOD'S PRESCIENCE OF THE SINS OF MEN, WISDOM AND SINCERITY OF HIS COUNSELS, EXHORTATIONS, AND WHATSOEVER MEANS HE USES TO PREVENT THEM. IN A LETTER TO THE HON. ROBERT BOYLE, Esq. TO WHICH IS ADDED, A POSTSCRIPT IN DEFENCE OF THE SAID LETTER. Sir, The veneration I have long had for your name, could not permit me to apprehend less obligation than that of a law, in your recommending to me this subject. For within the whole compass of intellectual employment and affairs, none but who are so unhappy as not at all to know you, would dispute your right to prescribe, and give law. And taking a nearer view of the province you have assigned me, I must esteem it alike both disingenuous and undutifnl, wholly to have refused it. For the less you could think it possible to me to perform in it, the more I might perceive of kindness allaying the authority of the imposition ; and have the apprehension the more obvious to me that you rather designed in it mine own advantage, than that you reckoned the cause could receive any, by my undertaking it. The doubt, I well know, was mentioned by you as other men's, and not your own; whose clear mind, and diligent inquiry, leave you little liable to be encumbered with greater difficulties. "Wherefore that I so soon divert from you, and no more allow these papers to express any regard unto you, till the shutting of the discourse, is only a seeming iisrespeci or indecorum, put in the stead of a real one. For after you have given them the countenance, as to let it be understood you gave the first rise and occasion to the business and design of them ; I had little reason to slur that stamp put upon them, by adding to their (enough other) faults, that of making them guilty of so great a misdemeanor and impertinency, as to continue a discourse of this length, to one that hath so little leisure or occasion to attend to any thing can be said by them. Sect. I. What there is of difficulty in this matter I ;annot pretend to set down in those most apt expressions wherein it was represented to me, and must therefore en- deavour to supply a bad memory out of a worse invention. So much appears very obvious, that ascribing to the ever blessed God, among the other attributes which we take to belong to an every way perfect Being, a knowledge so perfect as shall admit of no possible accession or increase; and consequently the prescience of all future events, as whereof we doubt him not to have the distinct knowledge when they shall have actually come to pass. Since many of those events are the sinful actions or omissions of men, which he earnestly counsels and warns them against ; this matter of doubt cannot but arise hereupon, viz. " How it can stand with the wisdom and sincerity which our own thoughts do by the earliest anticipation challenge to that ever happy Being, to use these (or any other means) with a visible design to prevent that, which in the mean time appears to that all-seeing eye sure to come to pass." So that, by this representation of the case, there seem to be committed together, — either, first, God's wisdom with this part of his knowledge, for we judge it not to consist with the wisdom of a man, to design and pursue an end, which he foreknows he shall never attain : — orsecondl3\ the same foreknowledge with his sincerity and uprightness, that he seems intent upon an end, which indeed he intends not. The matter then comes shortly to this sum. Either the holy God seriously intends the prevention of .such foreseen sinful actions and omissions, or he doth not intend it. If he do, his wisdom seems liable to be impleaded, as above. If he do not, his uprightness and truth. My purpose is not, in treating of this affair, to move a dispute concerning the fitness of the words prescience or foreknowledge, or to trouble this discourse with notions I understand not, of the indivisibility and unsuccessiveness of eternal duration, whence it would be collected there can be no such thing as first or second, fore or after, knowledge in that duration ; but be contented to speak as I can un- derstand, and be understood. That is, to call that fore- knowledge which is the knowledge of somewhat that as yet is not, but that shall sometime come to pass. For it were a mere piece of legerdemain, only to amuse inquirers whom one would pretend to satisfy ; or to fly to a cloui for refuge from the force of an argument, and avoid ai occurring difficulty by the present reliefless shift of in volving oneself in greater. Nor shall I design to mysel so large a field as a tractate concerning the Divine presci- ence : so as to be obliged to discourse particularly what- soever may be thought to belong to that theological topic. But confine the discourse to my enjoined subject. And offer only such considerations as may some way tend to expedite or alleviate the present difficulty THE RECONCILEABLEjS'ESS OF GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. 115 Sect. II. It -were one of the greatest injuries to religion, a subversion indeed of its very foundations, and tlian by doing which, we could not more highly gratify atheistical minds, instead, and under pretence of ascribing perfections to the nature of God, to ascribe to it inconsistencies, or to give a self-repugnant notion of that adorable Being, the parts whereot should justle and not accord with one ano- ther. And yet equal care is to be taken, lest while we en- deavour to' frame a consistent notion of God, we reject from it any thing that is truly a perfection, and so give a maimed one. Whereby we should undo our own de.-;ign, and by our over-much caution to make our conception of him a^'ree with itself, make it disagree to him. For to an absolutely perfect being, no other can agree than that, which not only is not made up of contradictious ; but which also comprehends in it all real perfections either explicitly, or which leaves room for all, by not positively excluding any of them. Which to do, and afterwards to assign that as ihe proper notion of God, -were itself the greatest con- tradiction. We need therefore to be very wary, lest we pronounce too hastily concerning any thing, which to oar most sedate thcugbls. appears simph^ a perfection in itself, that it carries with it a repugnancy to somewhat else, ne- cessary to be ascribed to him. We are first to suspect (as there is greatest cause) and inquire whether the ail be not wholly in our own minds. Which in this and such like cases, we certainly shall, upon due reflection, find labouring under the natural defect of that incomprehensive narrowness that is, in some degree, unavoidably followed with confusion and indistinctness of thoughts. And may perhaps find cause to accuse them of the more culpable evils, both of slothfulness, that with- holds them from doing what they can, and self-conceit, by which they imagine to themselves an ability of doing what they cannot. It cannot be unobserved by them that have made themselves any part of their own stud}"^, that it is very incident to our minds, to grasp at more than they can compass ; and then, through their own scantiness, (like the little hand of a child,) to throw away one thing that hath pleased us, to make room for another, because we cannot comprehend boih together. It is not strange, that our so straitly limited understandings should not be able to lodge commodiously the immense perfections of a Deity ; so as to allow them liberty to spread themselves in our thoughts in their entire proportions. And because Ave can- not, we complain, when we feel ourselves a little pinched that the things will not consist ; when the matter is, that we have unduly crowded and huddled them up together, in our incomprehensive minds, that have not distinctly con- ceived I hem. And though this consideration should not be used for the protection of an usurped liberty of fastening upon God, arbitrarily and at random, what we please; (as indeed what so gross absurdity might not any one give shelter to by such a misapplication of it 1) we ought yet to think it seasona- bly applied, when we find ourselves urged with difficulties on one hand and the other ; and apprehend it hard, with clearness and satisfaction, to ascribe to God, what we also find it not easy not to ascribe. Nor would it be less unfit to apply it for "the patronage of that slothfulness wherein our discouraged minds are sometimes too prone to indulge themselves. To which purpose I remember somewhat verv apposite in Minucius Felix, that many, through the mere tediousness of finding out the truth, do rather, by a mean succumbency, yield to the first specious show of any opin- ion whatsoever, than be at the trouble, by a pertinacious diligence, of applying themselves to a thorough search. Thotigh the comprehension of our minds be not infinite, it might be extended much further than usually it is, if we would allow ourselves with patient diligence to consider things at leisure, and so as gradually to stretch and en- large our own understandings. Many things have car- ried the appearance of contradiction and in-consistency, to the first view of our straitened minds, which afterwards wc have, upon repeated consideration and endeavour, found room for, and been able to make fairly accord, and lodge together. Especially we should take heed lest it be excluded by over-much conceitedness, and a self-arrogating pride, that disdains to be thought not able to see through every thin?. by the first and slightest glance of a haughty eye; and peremptorily determines that to be unintelligible, that an arrogant and uninstrucled mind, hath only not humility enough to acknowledge difficult to be understood. Whence it is too possible some may be over-prone to detract from God what really belongs to him, lest any thing should seem detracted from themselves, and impute imperfections to him rather than confess their own. And may be so over- ascribing to themselves, a.s to reckon it a disparagement not to be endured, to seem a little puzzled for the present, to be put to pause, and draw breath awhile, and look into the matter again and again; which if their humility and patience would enable them to do, it is not likely that the Author of our faculties would be unassisting to them, in those our inquiries which concern our duty towards him- self. For though in matters of mere speculation, we may be encountered with difficulties, whereof perhaps no mor- tal can ever be able to find out the solution, (which is nc great prejudice, and may be gainful and instructive to us,^ yet as to what concerns the object of our religion, it is tc be hoped we are not left in unextricable entanglements; nor should think we are till Ave have made our utmost trial. The design being not to gra'iiy our curiosity, but to relieve ourselves of uncomfortable doubtfulness in the matter of our worship, and (in a dutiful zeal towards the blessed object thereof) to vindicate it against the cavils of ill-minded men. Sect. III. But if the nnsucce.s.sfulness of often repeated endeavours make us despair of being able, with so full sa- tisfaction, to reconcile some things which we haA^e thought were to be attributed to God ; it will be some relief to us, if we find the things about which the doubt lies, are not of the same order, nor such as with equal eA-idence and necessity are to be affirmed of him. And when we make a comparison, we maA' find ourselves at a certainty con- cerning those his attributes Avhich most commonh', and at the first view, approA-e themseh-es to eA'ery man's under- standing. Among Avhich Ave little hesitate, (as we are most concerned not to do,) about those which carr)' with them the import of moral goodness; and which renderlhe object of our religion, at once, both most A'encrable and loA'ely. For none do more naturally obtain for common notions concerning him ; so as even to preA-ent ratiocina- tion or argument, with Avhomsoever the apprehension ol his existence hath place. Every man's mind, it being once acknowledged that there is a God, refuses to conceive otherwise of him, than that he is hol)^, just, merciful, true, &c. and rejects with abhorrence the notion of an impure, unrighteous, crnel, deceitful Deity. As for those that, by a long train of our own more uncertain and lubricous reasonings, we endea- vour to deduce ; if we find ourselves constrained any Avhere to admit a diffidence, it were rather to be placed here. For it is at first sight eA'idenl, since God is most certainly willing to be knoA\Ti of them that are sincerely willing to knoAv him ; that what is a natural impression stamped by his oAvn hand on every man's mind, hath more of absolute certainty, tlian Avhat depends on metaphysi- cal subtlety ; whereof so A'erv feAv are capable, and Avhereby diA'ers pretenders thereto, do so frequently (and perhaps A^ery dangerously) insnare themseh-es. And it is of far greater importance, such a notion of God be entertained, as Avherebv he may be rendered amiable, and an inviting object of love, (the very life and soul of all religion.) than such as shall be the result, and entertainment, only of scholastic Avit. Yet also, since it is A^ery manifest that man is now be- come a degenerate creature, and in an apostacA' from God, he is A'ery little to be trusted Aviih the framing his own idea of him ; being certainly most unapt to alloAV any thing a place in it, that Avould haA-e an unfavourable as- pect upon his vicious inclinations and his guilty state. And the contaofion of man's sinfulness having spread itself as far as he hath propagated his oAvn nature ; so as no notion in his mind can be more common than the perver- sion and distemper of his mind itself; the possibility and danger is very obvious, of mistaking a dictate of depraA-ed nature for an authentic con^mon notion. And though these are not impossible to be distinguished, and in some cases very easy, as Avhen men fmd it imposed unavoidably^ 116 1 tIE RECONCILEABLENESS upon them, to apprehend and acknowledge some things which they are very unwilling should be true, (in which case their sentiments have the same right to be believed as the testimony of an enemy on the opposite parly's be- half,) we have yet no reason to neglect any other means, whereby we may be more certainly directed how to con- ceive of God, or what we are to attribute to him, and what not. Sect. IV. Nor can we be at a greater certainty, than in admitting such things to belong to the blessed God as he plainly affirms of himself; or any way, by his word, evi- dently discovers to belong to him. For as none knows the things of man, but the spirit of man that is in him, so the things of God are known to none but the Spirit of God. » Taking therefore his own word for our measure in the present case, (which I will suppose the reader not to think it unreasonable to appeal to ; and what is here said, is in- tended only for those that have that estimate of the wri- tings wont to go under that name,) what it says of him (much more what it proves) will no doubt be admitted for certain truth. Though, if it say such things, as, to us, seem not so manifestly to agree with one another, our en- deavour must be the more earnest and solicitous (as also it ought to be the more modest) to discuss, and remove the cj'di/rioc/iai'/s or whatsoever semblance of disagreement. And whosoever concern themselves to peru.se that venerable book, will find every where, on the one hand, proclaimed and magnified in it, (what our own minds cannot but have been pre-posse.ssed of,) the most exquisite wisdom of God, whereby he forms and contrives the methods of all his dis- pensations, and disposes them in the aptest subserviency to his own great and most important ends: that "all his ways are judgment," b and that he '' worketh all things ac- cording to the counsel of his will.'o In sum, that all wis- dom is appropriated to him, that he is celebrated in the style of " God, only vvi.se." d Nor are we therefore to think it strange, if, many times, we are not able to trace him out, or understand the reason of every thing he thinks fit to do. For the paths of the more perfect wisdom, must therefore be expected to be the mor'; abstruse, and remoter from common apprehension. How ofien do we find ourselves so far outgone by wise and designing men, as that we are sometimes constrained to confess and admire their great prudence and conduct (when they have efl^ected their purposes) in those manage- ments, which we have before beheld, either with silent ig- norance, or perhaps, not without censure. How much less should the wisest of men regret it, to find all their con- jectures exceeded by the infinite wisdom : in the contem- plation whereof, we find the great apostle (notwithstand- ing the vast capacity of his divinely enlightened un- derstanding) exclaiming in a transport, O the depths ! "^ And when our eyes tell us, from so manifest stupendous effects, how far we are exceeded by him in power, it were reasonable to expect he should surpass us proportionably in the contrivances of his wisdom also. And whereas the conjimction is rare, among men, of deep political wis- dom with integrity and strict righteousness; this proceeds from the imperfection and insuflficiency of the former in great part, that they know not how to compass their de- signs, unless often, by supplying their want of wisdom, out of the spoil and violation of their justice and honesty. Otherwise, these are things not altogether so out of credit in the world, but that men would rather accomplish their purposes bj' fair and unexceptionable means, if they could tell how. Only the respect and deference they have for them is less, than what they bear to their own interests and ends. But besides the natural, inflexible rectitude of the Di- vine will, we are secured, from his all-sufficiency, that we shall never be fraudulently impo.sed upon by any of his declarations unto the children of men. For there is no- thing to be gained by it: and we cannot conceive what inducement he should have, to make use of any so mean and pitiful shiAs for the governing of his creatures, whom he spontaneously raised out of notliing, and hath so per- fectly Avithin his power. Unless we should be so most a 1 Cor. ii. II. b Dent, xxxii. il T^mn XV i lilt. e Roni. \'. 33. K Isa. xin. 9, 10. with chap, xl' 22 23. cEph. in. f Psol. xi. 7. intolerably injurious to him, as to imagine a worse thing of him than we would of the worst of men, that he loved falsehood for its own sake. And that against his so con- stantly professed detestation of it, the declared repugnan- cy of it to his nature, and the even tenor of his word (eve- ry where agreeing with itself herein) so often describing him by that property, "God that cannot lie." And, with the same positiveness, avowing his own uprightness, and requiring it, expressing his great love to it, and the high delight he takes to find it, in his intelligent creatures. The righteous God loveth righteousness, and with his countenance doth he behold the upright, f Nor is his tes- timony the less to be regarded for that it is laudatory, and of himself. For we are to consider the prerogative of him that testifies, and that if he were not avrd-nTus he were not God. Besides that his giving us this or any repiesentation of himself (to whom it were enough to enjoy his own per- fections) is a vouchsafement, and done of mere grace and favour to us, that we may by it be induced to place with satisfaction our unsuspicious trust and confidence in him. As also, that he says in all this, no other thing of himself, than what our own minds, considering him as God, must acknowledge most worthy of him, and agreeing to tiim with the most apparent necessity. This part, therefore, of the idea of God hath so firm a foundation, both in the na- tural complexion of our own minds, and the report which his word makes of him, that on this hand we are hemmed in as by a Avail of adamant : and cannot have the thought of defending his prescience, by intrenching upon his wis- dom and truth, without offering the highest violence both to him and ourselves. Sect. V. On the other hand also, as it cannot but seem to us a higher perfection to know all things at once, than gradually to arrive to the knowledge of one thing afler an- other; and so proceed from the ignorance of some things to the knowledge of them ; and that nothing is more cer- tain, than that all possible perfection must agree to God ; so we find his own word asserting to him that most perfect knowledge which seems to exclude the possibility of in- crease ; or that any thing should succeed into his know- ledge. For how plainly is it affirmed of him that he knows all things. And even concerning .such future things as about which our present inquiry is conversant, the affir- mation is express and positive. I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done.e Nor is the affirmation naked, and unfortified. For in the same sacred records, we hav'e the same thing both affirmed, and proved: inasmuch as we find, in a great part thereof, are contained things foretold by most express prophecy, unto which the events recorded in other parts (and many of them in other unquestioned writings besides) have so punctually corresponded, as to leave no place for doubt or cavil. Instances are so plain and well known that they need not be mentioned. And surely what was so expressly foretold could not but have been foreknown. It seems then an attempt also eqitally hopeless and unrelieving, as it were adventurous and bold, to offer at the protection ol his Avisdom and sincerity, by assaulting his prescience or certain foreknowledge of whatsoever shall come to pass. And that their defence is not to be attempted this way, Avill further most evidently appear from hence, that it is not impossible to assign particular instances of some or othermost confessedly wicked actions; against which God had directed those ordinary means of counselling and de- horting men, and which yet it is most certain he did fore- knoAV they would do. As though it was so punctually determined evenh to a day, and was (though not so punc- tually i) foretold unto Abraham, how long, from that time, k his seed should be strangers in a land that was not theirs; yet how frequent are the counsels and warnings sent to Pharaoh to dismiss them sooner; yea, how often are Moses and Aaron directed to claim their liberty, and exhort Pha- raoh to let them go, and at the same time told, i he should not hearken to them. Nor indeed is it more seldom said that the Lord hardened Pharaoh's heart, lest he should. Though it ma}' be a doubt Avhether those passages be truly h Exod. xi. 41. i Gen, xv 3. k What tlierp is of difficulty or doubt about llii« propliecj', sec fully cleared in the late letter to the Deist. 1 Ejod iv. &c. OF GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. 117 translated; for the gentler meaning of the Hebrew idiom being well known, it would seem more agreeable to the text, to have expressed only the intended sense, than to have strained a word to the very utmost of its literal im- port, and manifestly beyond what was intended. After the like manner is the prophet Ezekiel sent to the revolted Israelites. And directed to speak to them with God's own words, the sum and purport whereof was to warn and dehort them from their wicked ways lest they should die; when as yet it is plainly told him, but the house of Israel will not hearken to thee, for they will not hearken to me.™ Unto which .same purpose it is more pertinent, than necessary to be added, that our Saviour's own plain a-ssertions that he was the Son of God, the many miracles by which he confirmed it, and his frequent exhortations to the Jews to believe in him thereupon, had a manifest ten- dency to make him be known and believed to be so, and consequently to prevent that most horrid act of his cruci- fixion; for it is said, and the matter speaks itself, that, if they had known they would not have crucified the Lord of glory:" notwithstanding that it was a thing which God's hand and counsel had determined before to be done.° That is, foreseeing wicked hands would be prompted and ready for this tragic enterprise, his sovereign power and wise counsel concurred with his foreknowledge so only, and not with less latitude, to define or determine the bounds and limits of that malignity, than to let it proceed unto this execution. And to deliver him up (not by any formal resignation, or surrender, as Ave well know, but per- mitting him) thereunto. Though the same phrase of de- livering him hath, elsewhere, another notion, of assigning or appointing him to be a propitiation for the sins of men, by dying; which was done by mutual agreement between both the parties, him that was to propitiate, and him who was to be propitiated. In which respect our Saviour is also said to have given himself for the same purpose;? which purpose it was determined not to hinder prepared hands to execute in this way. Now if it did appear but in one single instance only, that the blessed God did foreknow, and dehort from the same act, it will be plainly consequent, that his warnings, and dehortations from wicked actions in the general, can with no pretence be alleged as a proof against his universal pre- science. For if the argument, he dehorted from the doing such an action, therefore he did not foreknow it, would be able to conclude any thing, it must be of suflicient force to conclude universally; which it cannot do, if but a single instance can be given, wherein it is apparent he did both dehort and foreknow. It can only pretend to raise the doubt which we have in hand to discuss, how fitly, and with what wisdom and sincerity, he can be understood to interpose his counsels and monitions in such a case. Sect. VI. Wherefore nothing remains but to consider how these may be reconciled, and niTade appear to be no way in onsistent with one another. Nor are we to appre- hend herein so great a diificulty, as it were to reconcile his irresistible pre-determinative concurrence to all actions of the creature, even those that are in themselves most malis:nantly wicked, with the wisdom and righteousness of his laws against them, and severest punishments of them according to those laws. Which sentiments must, I con- ceive, to any impartial understanding, leave it no way suf- ficiently explicable, how the influence and concurrence, the holy God hath to the worst of actions, is to be distin- guished from that which he affords to the best; wherein such inherently evil actions are less to be imputed to him who forbids them, than to the malicious tempter who prompts to them, or the actor that does them ; or ^'herein not a great deal more. And leave it imdeniable, that the matter of all his laws, in reference to all .such actions that ever have been done in the world, was a simple and most natural impossibilit}\ Nothing being more apparently so, than either not to do an action whereto the agent is deter- mined by an infinite power; or to separate the malignity thereof, from an intrinsically evil action; and that this natural impossibility of not sinning was the ineluctable fate of his (at first) innocent creatures. Who also (as the case IS to be conceived of with the angels that kept not their first station) must be understood irreversibly con- m Ezek. iii. 4. n 1 Cor. ii. 12 demned to the suffering of eternal punishment, for the doing of what it wa.s (upon these terms) so absolutely impossible to them to avoid. Sect. VII. niis too hard province the present design pretends not to intermeddle in, as being neither appre- hended manageable, for those briefly mentioned considera- tions, and many more that are wont to be insisted on in this argument. Nor indeed at all necessary; for though many consider- ations have been, with great subtlety, alleged and urged to this purpose, by former and some modern writers, (which it is besides the design of these papers severally to discuss,) these two, which seem the most importunate and enforc- ing, will, I conceive, be found of little force; and then, the le.ss strength which is in others, will Ije nothing for- midable : viz. that it necessarily belongs to the Original and Fountain Being, to be the first Cause of whatsoever being; and consequently that what there is of positive being in any the most wicked action, must pi incipally owe it.self to the determinative productive influence of this first and sovereign Cause. Otherwise it would seem there were some being that were neither primum, nor a prinio. And again, (which we are more concerned to consider, because it more concerns our present subject,) that it were otherwise impossible God should foreknow the sinful ac- tions of men, (many whereof, as hath been observed, he hath foretold,) if their futurition were a mere contingency, and depended on the uncertain will of the subordinate agent, not determined by the .'supreme. But neither of these seem able to infer tlie dismal conclusion of God's con- curring by a determinative influence unto wicked actions. Not the former : for it may well be thought suflicienlly to salve the rights and privileges of the first Cause, to assert that no action can be done but by a power derived from it; which in reference to forbidden actions, intelli- gent creatures may use or not use as they please, without over-asserting, that they must be irresistibly determined also, even to the worst of actions done by them. Besides that it seems infinitely to detract from the perfection of the ever-blessed God, to affirm he was not able to make a creature, of such a nature, as, being continualh' sustained by him, and supplied with power every moment suitable to its nature, should be capable of acting unless whatso- ever he thus enables, he determine (that is, for it can mean no less thing, impel it to do also. And except it were afiirmed impossible to God to have made such a creature, (that is, that it implied a contradiction, which certainly can never be proved.) there is no imaginable pre- tence why it should not be admitted he hath done it ; rather than so fatally expose the wisdom, goodness, and righteousness of God,' by supposing him to have made laws for his reasonable creatures, impossible, through his own irresistible counter-action, to be observed ; and afterwards to express himself displeased, and adjudge his creatures to eternal punishments, for not observing them. I am not altogether ignorant what attempts have been made to prove if impossible, nor again, what hath been done to manifest the vanity of those attempts. But I must confess a greater disposition to wonder, that ever such a thing should be di.spuled, than dispute so plain a case. And that a matter whereupon all moral government depends, both human and divine, should not have been determined at the first sight. 'Tis not hard for a good wit to have somewhat to .say for any thing. But to dispute against the common sense of mankind, we know before- hand, is but to trifle ; as the essay to prove the impossi- bility of local motion. The notion of the goodness and righteousness of God, methinks, should stick so close to our minds, and create such a sense in our souls, as should be infinitelv dearer to us than all our senses and powers. And that we should rather choose to have our sight, hear- ing, and motive power, or what not besides disputed, or even torn away t'rom us, than ever .suffer ourselves to be disputed into a belief, that the holy and good God should irresistiblv determine the wills of men to. and punish, the same thing. Nor is it difficult to urge more puzzling so- phisms as:ainst the former, than for tliis latter. But the efforts of a sophistical wit against sense, and more against the sense of our souls, and most of all against the entire o Acts iv. 23. P Tit, ii. H. 118 THE RECONCILEAELENESS sum and substance of all morality and religion, at once, are but like the attempt to batter a wall of brass with straws and feathers, Kor is the assault, on this part, more feeble and impotent, than the defence is wont to be of the other. For I would appeal to the quick refined sense of any sober and pious mind, after serious, inward consulta- tion with itself; being closely urged, with the horror of so black a conception of God, that he should be supposed irresistibly to determine the will of a man to the hatred of his own most blessed self, and then to exact severest pmiish- ments for the offence done, what relief it would now be to it, to be only taught to reply, that man is under the law, and God above it. A defence that doubles the Ibrce of the assault. What ! that God should make a law, and neces- sitate the violation of it ! and yet also punish that violation ! And this be thought a sufficient salvo, that himself is not subject to any law ! Will a quick-scenled, tender spirit, w^ormded by so unsutferable indignity, offered to the holy God, be any whit eased or relieved, by the thin sophistry of only a collusive ambiguity in the word law ] which sometimes signifies the declared pleasure of a ruler to a subject, in which sense any eye can see God can be under no law, having no superior. But not seldom, also, an habitual fixed principle and rule of acting after one steady tenor. In which sense how manifest is it, that the perfect jectitude of God's own holy gracious nature is an eternal law to him, infinitely more stable, and immutable, than the ordinances of day and night ! Or what relief is there in that dream of the supposed possibility of God's making a reasonable creature Avith an innocent aversion to himself? For what can be supposed more repugnant 1 or what more impertinent '? If innocent, how were it punishable 7 A law already made in the case, how can it be innocent 1 But whatsoever strength there may be in arguments, and replies, to and fro, in this matter ; that which hath too apparently had greatest actual efficacy, with many, hath been the authority and name of this or that man of repu- tation, and the force of that art of imputing a doctrine, already under a prejudicial doom, to some or other ill-re- puted former writer. I profess not to be skilled in the use of that sort of weapons. And what reputation ought to be of so great value with us, as that of God and religion 1 Though if one would take that invidious course, it were easy to evince, that such a predeterminative influx to the production of all whatsoever actions, is the dearly espoused notion of one, of as deservedly an ill character, as ever had the name of a Christian writer. And whether he would not take that name for a dishonour to him, I pre- tend not to know. But let us take this sober account of the present case, that in this temporary state of trial, the efficacious grace of God is necessary to actions sincerely good and holy ; which therefore all ought undespairingly to seek and pray for. But that in reference to other ac- tions, he doth only supply men with such a power, as whereby they are enabled, either to act, or, in many in- stances, (and especially when they attempt any thing that is evil,) to suspend their own action. And surely it carries so unexceptionable a face and aspect with it, that no man that is himself sober, vWll think the worst name, of who- soever shall have said the same thing, were a prejudice to it ; or should more oblige him to reject it, than we would think ourselves obliged to throw away gold, or diamonds, because an impure hand hath touched them ; or to deny Christ, because the devils confessed him. Though also, if any should impute the so stating of this matter to any author, that hath been wont to go under an ill name and character, in the Christian church ; there were a great over- sight committed ; to say no harder thing of it. For the writers whose names would be supposed a prejudice, have neither said the same thing, nor with the same design. They would have this indetermination of the power afforded to the creature, to be so universal, as to extend equally to evil actions and to good. And have asserted it with a manifest design to exclude efficacious grace, in reference to the best actions. Whereas this account would make it not of so large extent: (as it were very unreasonable any «.hould;) for though it may well be supposed extendible to many actions, besides those that are intrinsically evil, or to any "that are not spiritually good, yet nothing enforces (nor can it be admitted) that it should actually and always extend so far. For who can doubt but God can overrule the inclinations and actions of his creature, when he pleases; and, as shall best consist with his wisdom, and the purity of his natiire, either lay on or take ofi" his de- termining hand. Nor is it here asserted with any other design, than to exempt the blessed God, as far as is pos- sible, from a participation in the evil actions of his crea- tures; in the meantime entitling him most entirely to those that are sincerely good. Though it must be left imputable to men themselves (it being through their own great default) if they have not the grace which might effectually enable them to do such also. And as for the latter. This supposed indetermination of the human will, in reference, especially, to wicked actions, is far from being capable of inferring, that God cannot therefore foreknow them ; or any thing more, than that we are left ignorant of the way, how he foreknows them. And how small is the inconvenience of acknowledging that, yea, and how manifest the absurdity of not acknowledging the like, in many cases! since nothing is more certain, than that God doth many things besides, whereof the manner how he does them, we can neither explicate nor understand ! For neither is it difficult to assign instances more than enough of actions done by ourselves of the manners whereof we can give no distinct account, as those of vision, intel- lection, with sundry others. Some have been at great pains we well know to explain the manner of God's foreknowledge of these futurities, otherwise than by laying the foundation thereof in his supposed efficacious will or decree of them. They that can satisfy themselves with what Thomas and Scotus have attempted, and the followers of them both ; that can un- derstand what it is, with the one, for all things to be eter- nally present to the Divine intellect in esse reali, and not understand by it, the world to have been eternal. Or, what with the other, that they be all present only in esse representativo, and not understand by it barely that they are all known, and no more, (which seems like the expli- cation of the word invasion by invasion,) let them enjoy their own satisfaction. For my own part, I can more easily be satisfied to be ignorant of the modus or medium of his knowledge, while I am sure of the thing; and I know not why any sober-minded man might not be so too. While we must all be content to be ignorant of the manner, yea, and nature too, of a thousand things besides, when that such things there are, we have no doubt. And when there are few^ things, about which we can, with less disadvantage, suffer our being ignorant; or with less disreputation, pro- fess to be so. It cannot therefore be so affrightful a thing, to suppose God's foreknowledge of the most contingent future actions, well to consist with our ignorance how he foreknows them, as that we should think it necessary to overturn and mingle heaven and earth, rather than admit it. Sect. VIII. Wherefore waving that unfeasible, unne- cessary, and unenjoined task, of defending God's predeter- minativ^e concourse unto sinful actions; our encounter must only be of the more superable difficulty, to reconcile his prescience of them with his provisions against them, i. s. how fitly the wise and holy God can have interposed his precautions and dissuasions, in their own nature, aptly tending to withhold and divert men from those evil ac- tions, which he yet foresees they will do. And it is, in the first place, evident, there can be no pretence to allege that there is any such repugnancy in the matter, as shall amount to a contradiction, so much as virtual, or which the things signified, on the one part and the other, can be understood any way to import, that indeed there should be a direct and explicit contradiction between foreknowing and de- horting, we may, at first sight, perceive the terms cannot admit ; for there is nothing enunciated (affirmed or denied) in either. But let the sense of both be resolved into pro- positions, capable of being confronted to one another, and all that can be made of the former, will only come to this, " You will do such a thing," and of the latter, no more but this, "You ought not to do it :" these are at as great distance, as can be imagined, from grating upon, or jarring with, one another. And wherein is the indecorum of it, that both these effata should proceed from the same mouth, viz. of a governor, or one that hath authority over others. OP GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. 119 We will, for discourse sake, suppose a prince endowed frith, the gift or spirit of prophecy. This most will ac- Knowledge a great perfection, added to whatsoever other his accomplishments. And suppose we this his prophetic ability so large, as to extend to most events that shall fall out within his dominions. Is it hereby become unfit for him to govern his subjects by laws, or any way admonish them of their duty 1 Hath this perfection so much dimin- ished him as to depo.se him from his government! It is not indeed to be dissembled, that it were a difficulty to determine, whether such foresight were, for himself, better or worse. Boundless knowledge seems only in a fit con- junction with as unbounded power. But it is altogether unimaginable that it should destroy his relation to his sub- jects. As what of it were left, if it should despoil him of his legislative power, and capacity of governing according to laws made by itl And to bring back the matter to the supreme Ruler: Let it for the present be supposed onh^, that the blessed God hath, belonging *o his nature, the universal prescience whereof we are discoursing ; we will, surely, upon that supposition, acknowledge it to belong to him as a perfection. And were it reasonable to affirm that by a perfection he is disabled for government; or were it a good consequence, " He foreknows all things, he is therefore unfit to govern the world." Sect. IX. And, that we may consider the matter more narrowly, would the supposition of such foreknowledge in God, make that cease to be man's AxAy, which had other- wise been sol and take away the diflTerences of good and evin Would it nullify the obligation of God's law, and make man's own inclination his only rule 1 or, if it be said, because it is foreknown, man will do such a thing, there- fore he may, where is the connexion 1 For what influence can foreknowledge have, to alter or efl^ect any way, either the nature of the thing foreknown, or the temper of the person that shall do it ; any more than the present know- ledge of the same thing, now in doing 1 which knowledge none would deny to God; and which, when it Occurs to a man, is no more understood to make an evil action inno- cent, than the action makes the eye guilty, of him that beholds it only, and detests it at once. Surely what is, in its own nature, whether good or evil, can never not be so, be it foreknown or not foreknown. But if what was otherwise man's duty, be still his duty, what can make it unfit that it be declared, and made known to him to be so % and how is that otherwise to be done, than by these disputed means 1 yea (for this is the case) what can make it less fit, than it would be that God should cease to rule over the world ; and quit the right of his government to his revolted creatures, upon no other reason, than only that he foresees the)' have a mind to in- vade it 1 It may now perhaps be said, all this reasoning tends indeed to establish the contrary assertion, that not- withstanding God do foreknow man's sin, it is however necessary he forewarn him of it — but it answers not the objected "difficulty, viz. how reasonably any such means are used for an unattainable end. As it is manifest, the end, man's obedience, cannot be attained when it is foreknown he will not obey. Sect. X. It may here, before we proceed further, not be unseasonable to consider, (a matter, as is known, wont to be much vexed in the schools,) how God may be said to act for any end at all. And it appears verj' certain, that he who is so every way absolutely perfect and happy, can- not be thought to intend and pursue an end, after the same manner as we are wont to do. We being conscious to ourselves of indigency, or, at the best, of obligation to the Author of our beings, are wont to design this or that end for the relieving of ourselves, or the approving ourselves to him. And, our satisfaction depending upon the attain- ment of it, we solicitously deliberate about the fittest means to attain it ; and are to.ssed with various passions, of desire, and hope, and fear, and joy, and grief, according as the end is apprehended more or less excellent, or likely to be attained; varying often our course upon new emerirencies, as this or that may probably promote or hinder the suc- cess of our pursuit. In short, we pursue ends, as being both impatient of disappointment, and uncertain of iheir attainment. q Acts IV. 13. The blessed God, being indigent of nothing, nor under obligation to any one, cannot be supposed to propound an end to himself as that whereupon his satisfaction depends, which were inconsistent with his already complete felicity, and would argue hirn but potentially happy. But acting always from an immense self-sufficient fulness of life, and of all perfections, doth ever satisfy him.self in himself, and take highest complacency in the perfect goodness, con- gruity, and rectitude of his own most holy will and way. And again, as he doth not seek a yet unattained satisfac- tion, in any end he can be supposed to propound to him- self; so nor can he be thought to deliberate, as we are wont to do, concerning the means of effecting any. For deliberation would imply doubtfulness and uncertainty, which his absolute perfection cannot admit ; nor doth need, the whole frame and compass of things intended by him, in their distinct references and tendencies, being, at once, present to his all-comprehending view; so that there can be no place for any intermediate knowledge with him, or for any new resolves thereupon. Known to the Lord are all his works from the beginning of the world.i Sect. XI. This being premised ; it is now further to be considered, that howsoever one end oftentimes is not at- tained, unto which the publicly extant declarations of the Divine will have a visible aptitude, viz. the obedient com- pliance of men with them ; another more noble end wa.s, however, attainable, not unbecoming the designment of the Divine wisdom, and which it was every way most worthy of God to be more principally intent upon. It is fit the mention of this be prefaced with an obvious remark ; — that the misapprehension of the state of things between God and man doth, in great part, owe itself to our aptness to compare unduly the Divine government with that of secular rulers ; and our expectation to find them in all things agreeing with each other. Whereas there cannot but be a vast difference, between the constitution and end of God's government over his creatures, and more espe- cially mankind, and that of man over his fellow-creatures of the same kind. The government of secular, human rulers, can never be, in the constitution of it, altogether absolute, nor ought, in the design of it, primarily to intend the personal advantage of the ruler himself, who as much depends upon his subjects, and hath (at least) as great need of them, as they can be understood to have of him. But as to the blessed God the matter is apparent, and hath its own triumphant evidence, that since he is the original and root of all being, that all things are mere dependencies upon his absolute pleasure, and entireh' of him, and by him, all ought to be to him, that he alone might have the glory. -^ Wherefore, it must be asserted, and cannot fail of ob- taining to be acknowledged, by every impartial and sober considerer of things, that there is a much more noble and important end, that all God's public edicts and declara- tions to men, (the instruments of his government over them,) do more principally aim at, than their advantage, viz. the dignity and decorum of his government itself; and that he may be found in everything to have done as be- came him, and was most worthy of himself And what could be more so, than that he should testify the aversion of his own pure and holy nature, to whatsoever was un- holy and impure, his love of righteousness and compla- cency to he imitated herein, together with his steady, gra- cious propension to receive all them into the communion of his own felicity or blessedness (for the Redeemer's sake) who should herein comply with him 1 Nor are we to un- derstand that he herein so designs the reputation of his government, as men are often wont to do things out of design for their interest in that kind, that are, otherwise, against their overruled inclination. But we are to accoun' these his declarations (although they are acts of an intel ligent Agent, and the products of wisdom and counsel, yet al.so)"the spontaneous emanations of his own holy and gracious nature, such as wherein he most fully agrees, and consents with himself And is it now to be ex pected, that because he foresees men will be wicked, and do what shall be unworthy of them, he must therefore lay aside his nature, and omit to do what shall be worthy ol himself? r Rom. n. 130 THE RECONCILEAELENESS Sect. XIL And hereupon it may be expected, the more ingenuous and candid -RiU allo-vv themselves to think the matter tolerably clear, in reference to the former part of the proposed difficulty ;, i. e. will apprehend this way of dealing with men not imprudent, or inconsistent with the Divine wisdom, since, though one end, in a great part, fail, yet another, more valuable, is attained. But yet, as to the latter part, the difficulty may still urge, viz. how it can stand with sincerity ; whereas that end also which fails, seems to have been most directly intended, that the blessed God should seem so earnestly intent upon it : since it is hardly conceivable, that the same thing should be, at once, seriousl)' intended as an end, and yet, at the same time, give the eye, which seems to design it, no other prospect than of a thing never to be brought to pass. Wherefore we are next to consider, that we may pro- ceed gradually, and not omit to say what is in itself con- siderable ; though it is not all (which cannot be said at once) that is to be said ; — that the public declarations of the Divine will, touching man's duty, do attain that very end, his obedient compliance therewith, in great part, and as to many (although it be foreknown they will prove in- effectual with the most) are the no less successful, than the apt. means of attaining it. Nor, certainly, if it were fore- known the world would be so divided, as that some would obey, and others not obey, was it therefore the fittest course, that these two sorts should, by some extraordinary act of providence, be carefully severed from each oiher ; and those be dealt withal apart from the rest. But rather, that the Divine edicts should be of a universal tenor, and be directed to all as they are ; the matter of them being of maiversal concernment, and eqaally suitable to the com- mon case of all men. Sect. XIII. Neither yet was it necessary, that effectual care should be taken, they should actually reach all, and be applied to every individual person. Since it is appa- rently to be resolved into the wickedness of the world, that they do not so; and that there is not a universal dif- fusion of the gospel into every part. For it being evident to any one's reflection, that men are in a state of apostacy and defection from their Maker and common Lord, and therefcsre subject to his displeasure ; whereas the merciful God hath done his own part, and so much beyond what was to be expected from him ; issued out his proclama- tions of peace and pardon, upon so easy and indulgent termSy aS'- are expressed in his gospel; if, hereupon, men also did their part, behaved themselves suitably to the ex- igency of their case, and as did become reasonable crea- tures, fallen under the displeasure of their Maker, (whereof their common condition affords so innumerable, so preg- nant proofs,) the gospel, wheresoever it should arrive, would have been entertained with so great a transport of joy, and so ready and universal acceptance, as very soon to have made a great noise in the world ; and being found to be of a universal tenor and concernment, and that what it says to one nation, it equally says the same to every one ; it could not but be, that messengers would inter- changeably have run from nation to nation; some to com- municate, others to inquire after, those strange tidings of great joy unto all people, lately sent from heaven j con- cerning the Emmanuel, God with us; God, again upon his return to man, and now in Christ reconciling the world to himself. And thus how easily, and even naturally, would the gospel soon have spread itself through the world! es- pecially the merciful God having so provided, that there should be an office constituted, and set up ; a sort of men, whose whole business it should be, to propagate and pub- lish those happy tidings. But that men should so indulge their sensual, terrene inclination, as not at all to use their understandings and considering power, about other mat- ters than only what are within the sight of their eye, when by so easy and quick a turn of thoughts they might feel and find out who made them, and was the Original of their life and being, and that things are not right, and as they should be, between him and them; and so by what is within the compass of natural revelation, be prepared for what is supernatural. And not that only, but to that stupidity, by which they are unapt to inquire after and )receive, to add that obstinate malignity by which they ate apt to reject and oppose the merciful discoveries and overtures of their offended, reconcileable Creator and Lord. How manifestly doth this devolve the whole busi- ness of the little, slow progress of the gospel in the world, upon themselves onl}" ! As suppose we a prince of the greatest clemency, benignity, and goodness, from whom a whole country of his .subjects have made a most causeless defection ; hereupon to send to the whole body of the re- bels a gracious proclamation of free pardon upon their return to their allegiance and duty; and it only from hence comes to pass, that every individual person of them distinctly understands not what the message from their prince did import ; because, they that heard it would not, many of them, allow themselves to consider and regard it ; and others of them, with despiteful violence, fell upon the heralds, barbarously butchering some of them, and igno- miniously repulsing the rest : who would not say, that prince had fully done his part, and acquitted himself an- swerably to the best character, though he should send to the rebels no further overtures 1 Much more, if through a long tract of time, he continue the same amicable en- deavours for their reducement ; notwithstanding the con- stant experience of the same ill success; who would not cast the whole business of the continued ill understanding, between him and the revollers, upon themselves'? and reckon it impossible, an)' should be ignorant, of his kind and benign inclinations and intentions, if an implacable enmity, and disafl'eclion to him and his government, were not their common temper 1 Though so infinitely do- the mercies of God exceed those of the most merciful prince on earth, as well as his knowledge and power ; that wheresoever there are any exempt cases, we must conceive him equally able and in- clined to consider them distinctly. And so vastly differ- ent may we well suppose the degrees of happiness and misery to be, in the other world ; as that there may be latitude enough, of punishing and rewarding men, propor- tionably to the degrees of light they have had, and the more or less malignity, or propension to reconciliation, was found with them thereupon. Sect. XIV. Nor again was it at all incongruous, oi unbecoming, that the blessed God, this being the common temper and disposition of all men, to reject his gracious tenders, should provide, by some extraordinary means, that they might not be finally rejected by all. For what can be more appropriate to sovereignty (even where it is infinitely less absolute) than arbitrarily to design the ob- jects of special favour 1 Who blames a prince, for placing special marks of his royal bounty, or clemency, here and there as he thinks fit ? or that he hath some peculiar fa- vourites, with whom he familiarly converses, whom he hath won, bysome or other not common inducements, and assured their loyal affection ; though there be thousands of persons in his dominions besides, of as good parts, dis- positions, and deserts as they? It belongs to sovereignly, only so to be favourable to some, as, in the mean time, to be just towards all. Yea, and it must be acknowledged, such are the dispensations of the holy God towards the whole community of mankind, as import not only strict righteousness, but great clemency and mercy also. Though they might easily understand themselves to be offenders, and liable to the severities of his justice, they are spared by his patience, sustained by his bounty, protected by his power; their lives and properties are fenced by his own laws. And whereas they are become very dangerous enemies to one another; and each one his own greatest enemy ; it is provided by those laws, even for the worst of men, that none shall injure them, that all love them, and seek their good. He interposes his authority on their be- half; and, if any wrong them, he takes it for an affront done to himself. By the same laws they are directed to industry, frugality, sobriety, temperance, to exercise a government over themselves, to bridle and subdue their own exorbitant lusts and passions, their more immediate tormentors, and the sources of all the calamities and mise- ries which befall them in this world. By all which evi- dences of his great care, and concern for their welfare, they might understand him to hare favourable propensions towards them, and that though they have offended him, he is not their implacable enemy ; and might; by his good- ness, be led to repentance. OP GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. 121 Yea and moreover ; Ix? hath sent thein a Redeemer, liis own Son, an incarnate Deity, who came duwn into this workl, full of grace and truth, upon the must merciful errand. And they have some of them been in transports, when they have but fancied such a descent, for tlie doing them only some lighter good turn ; as upon the cure ot' the cripple. The gods (say they) arc come down in the likeness of men ! » He being filled with the glorious ful- ness of the Godhead, hath been a voluntary .sacrifice for the sins of men ; and if they would believe and obey him, they would find that sacrifice is accepted, and available for them. And though they are disabled to do so only by their own wicked inclination, even against that also they have no cause to despair of being relieved, if they would (which they might) admit the thoughts of their im- potency, and the exigency of their case, and did seriously implore Divine help. Sect. XV. Now with whom these methods succeed well, there is no suspicion of insincerit3^ Lei us see what pretence there can be for it, with the rest. It is to be considered, that, as to them he doth not apply himself to every, or to any, person immediately, and severally, after ; some such tenor of speech as this, " I know thee to be a profligate, hopeless wretch, and that thou wilt finally dis- regard whatsoever I say to thee, and consequently perish and become miserable. But however (though I foresee m.ost certainly thou wilt not, yet) I entreat thee to hear, and obey, and live." Indeed, sending a prophet to a pro- ; miscuous people, he foretells hira of such ill success, t! But it is not told hira he should succeed so ill universally, and it is implied, he should not. " But the course the great God takes, is only to apply himself to these (as hath been said) in common with the rest. For if it be said he also applies himself to them b}' the private dictates of his Spirit ; he does not, by it, make formed speeches to men. But as to those its common motions, whereby it applies itself imto them, doth only solicit, in a slated manner of operation, in and by their own reason and consciences, (as he concurs with our infe- rior faculties, and with the inferior creatures, suitable to their natures and capacities,) speaking no other than their own language, as the}'' are instructed out of his word, or by other means. Which he usually continues to do, till by their resistances, they have sealed up their own con- sciences, and consequently (according to its more ordinary fixed course, and laws of access and recess) shut out the Holy Spirit both at once. Nor is it more to be expected he should universally alter that course ; tlian that he should alter the courses of the sun, moon, and stars, and innovate upon universal nature. So that what is endea- voured for the reducement of such, as finally refuse to re- turn, by particular applications to this or that person, and beyond what is contained in the public declarations of his written word, is by substituted ministers and inferior agents, that know no more of the event, than they do themselves. And that this was the fittest way of dealing with reason- able creatures, who, that will use his own reason, sees not 1 Sect. XVI. That our disquisition may be here a little more strict we shall inquire both, — What may be sup- posed po.ssible to be alleged out of God's word, in refer- ence to them that persist in wickedness till they finally perish, which it can be thought not consistent with sin- cerity, to have inserted, upon the supposed foresight of so dismal an issue. And what more convenient course we can think of, which sincerity (as we apprehend) would have required. As to the former. It may, perhaps, be alleged, that he professes to will the salvation of all men. « Not to desire the death of hira that dieth. y Yea, and professes himself grieved that any perish. ^ Now these things, compared with his public declarations and tenders, directed, in a universal tenor, lo all men, carry that appearance and show with them, as if he would have it believed, his end were to save all. Wherewith his foresight of the perdition of so many seems ill to agree. For how can that end be seriously intended which it is foreseen will not be brought about 1 And how can it be thought to consist with sin- cerity, that there should be an appearance of his having such an end, unto which, a serious real intention of it « Act« )dv. t Ezek. ili. 7. u Vor. -il. doth not correspond 1 Wherefore we shall here examme, what appeaianco such expressions as those above recited, can, by just interpretation, be understood to amount unto. And liien show that there is really with the ble.ssed GihI, wliai doth truly and fully corresixmd to that appeai-ance; and very ngieeably too, with the hypothe.-is of his foresee- ing how' tilings will finally issue, wiih very many. And first, that \vc may understand the true import of the expressions which we have mentioned, and others ot like sound and meaning. We are to consider, that though being taken severally and apart, they aie not capable ola sense, prejudical to the cau.se, the defence whereof we have undertaken, which we shall aJierwards more distinctly evince, yet, it were very injurious, lo go about to a/hx a sense unto a single expression, without weighing tJie general design of the writings, whereof it is a part. It were quite to frustrate the use of words, when a matter is to be represented, that is copious, and consists of many parts and branches, which cannot be comprehended in one of a few sentences ; if we will pretend to estimate and make a judgment of the speaker's full meaning, by -this or that single passage onl)^, because we have not jiatience or lei- sure to hear the rest ; or perhaps have a greater dispositioa to cavil at his words, than understand his meaning. If a, course resembling this should be taken, in interpreting the edicts or laws of princes and stales, (suppose it were a proclamation of pardon to delinquent subjects,) and only this or that favourable clause be fastened upon, without regard to the inserted provisos and conditions ; the (con- cerned) interpreters might do a slight, temporary, and easily remediable wrong to the prince, but are in danger, more fatally, to wrong themselves. The edicts of the great God, that are publicly extant to mankind, (the universal publication «'hereof thej' partly withstand, and which they too commonly deprave, and perversely misinterpret, where they do obtain,) carry no such appearance with them, as if he had ever proposed it to himself, for his end, to save all men, or any man, let them do what they please, or how destructive a course soever they lake, and shall finally persist in. If that were supposed his design, his so seemingly serious counsels and exhortations were as ludicrous, as they could be thought, if it were as peremptorily determined all should perish. For what God will, by almighty power, immedi- ately work, without the subordinate concurrence of any second cause, must be necessarily. And it is equally vain, solicitously to endeavour the engaging of subordinate ngents, to "do that which without them is absolutely neces- saiT, as it were to endeavour that, bj' them, which is abso- lutelv impossible. Sect. XVII. That which his declarations to men do amount unto, is, in sum, thus much, — that, whereas they have, bv their defection and revolt from him, made them- selves liable to his justice, and very great consequent miseries; he is willing to pardon, save, and restore them to a blessed state, upon such terms as shall be agreeable (the recompense due to his injured law being othei-wise provided for, at no expense of theirs) to the nature of that blessedness they are to enjoy, the purity of his own nature, and the order and dignity of his government. That is, that thev seriouslv repent and turn to him, love him as the Loid their God, wiih all their heart and soul, and might and mind ; and one another as themselves; (being to make together one happ)' community, in the participation of the same blessedness ;) commit themselves by entire trust, subjection, and devoledne.ss to their great and merciful Redeemer, according to the measure of light wherewith he shall have been revealed and made known to them-, submit to the motions and dictates of his blessed Spirit, whereby the impression of his own holy imase is to be renewed in theni^and a divine nature imparted to them: and carefully atteifd to his word as the means, the impres- sive instrument or seal, by which, understood and con- sidered, that impression shall be ntade, and the very seeds out of which that holy nature, and the entire frame of the new creature, shall result and spring up in them ; so as to make them apt unto the obedience that is expected from them, and capable of the blessedness they are to expect; that if they neglect to attend to these external discoveries V T.zA. \-.ii! 35. 7 P«. K.vsi. 12, 13. X 1 Tim. ii. 4. THE RECONCILEABLENESS and refuse the ordinary aids and assistances of his good Spirit and offer violence to their own consciences, they are not to expect he should overpower them, by a strong hand and save them against the continuing disinclination of their own wills. Nor (whatsoever extraordinary acts he may do upon some, to make them willing) is there any universal promise in his word, or other encouragement, upon which any may reasonably promise themselves that, in the neglect and disuse of all ordinary means, such power shall be used with them, as shall finally overcome their averse, disaffected hearts. Sect. XVIII. 'Tis true that he frequently uses much importunity with men, and enforces his laws with that earnestness, as if it were his own great interest to have them obeyed ; wherein, having to do with men, he doth like a man, solicitously intent upon an end which he can- not be satisfied till he attain. Yet withal, he hath inter- spersed, every where in his word, so frequent. Godlike expressions of his own greatness, all-sufficiency, and inde- pendency upon his creatures, as that if we attend to these his public declarations, and manifests of himself entirely, so as to compare one thing with another, we shall find the matter not at all dissembled ; but might collect this to be the state of things between him and us, that he makes no overtures to us, as thinking us considerable, or as if any thing were to accrue to him from us. But that, as he takes pleasure in the diffusion of his own goodness, so it is our interest to behave ourselves suitably thereunto, and, according as we comply with it, and continue in it, or do not, so we may expect the delectable communications of it, or taste, otherwise, his just severity. That, therefore, when he exhorts, obtests, entreats, beseeches that we would obey and live ; speaks as if he were grieved at our dis- obedience, and what is like to ensue to us therefrom ; these are merciful condescensions, and the efforts of that goodness, which chooseth the fittest ways of moving us, rather than that he is moved himself, by any such passions as we are wont to feel in ourselves, when we are pursuing our own designs. And that he vouchsafeth to speak in such a way as is less suitable to himself, that it may be more suitable to us, and might teach us, while he so far complies with us, how becoming it is that we answerably bend ourselves to a compliance with him. He speaks, sometimes, as if he did suffer somewhat human, as an apt means (and which to many proves effectual) to bring us to enjoy, at length, what is truly divine. We may, if we consider, and lay things together, understand these to be gracious insinuations ; whereby, as he hath not left the matter liable to be so misunderstood, as if he were really affected with solicitude, or any perturbation concerning us, (which he hath sufficiently given us to understand his blessed nature cannot admit of,) so nor can they be thought to be disguises of himself, or misrepresentations, that have nothing in him corresponding to them. For they really signify the obedience and blessedness of those his crea- tures that are capable thereof, to be more pleasing and agreeable to his nature and will, than that they should disobey and perish ; (which is the utmost that can be im- derstood meant by those words, God will have all men to lie saved and come to the knowledge of the truth ;) but withal, that he so apprehends the indignity done to his government, by their disobedience, that if they obey not (as the indulgent constitution and temper of his law and government now are, in and by the Redeemer) they must perish. And that he hath also such respect to the con- gruity and order of things, as that it shall not be the ordi- nary method of his government over reasonable creatures, to overpower them into that obedience, by which it may come to pass that they perish not. All which may be collected from those his own plain words, in that other recited text, and many besides of like import. When, "with so awful solemnity, he professes, that as he lives he takes no pleasure in the death of sinners, but that they may turn and live ; and adds. Turn ye, turn ye, why will you die 1 * That is, that their repentance, and consequent welfare, would be more grateful tohim than their perdition, upon their persevering in destructive ways ; but yet, that if they were not moved to repent, by these his pleadings and expostulations used with them, they should die, and were therefore concerned to attend and hearken to such his reasonings and warnings, as the apt means to work their good ; not expecting he should take extraordinary courses with them, in order to it. And that the real re- spect he had thereunto, should never induce him to use any indecorous course to bring it about; but that he had a more principal respect to the rules of justice, and the order of his government, than to their concernments. And that he, notwithstanding, expresses himself aggrieved that any finally perish. If we consider and recollect, what notices he hath furnished our minds with, of the per- fections of a Deity, and what he hath remonstrated to us of his own nature, so plainly in his word; we cannot understand more by it, than the calm dispassionate resent- ment and dislike, which most perfect purity and goodness have, of the sinfulness and miserable ruin of his own creatures. In all which we have a most unexceptionable idea of God, and may behold the comely conjuncture of his large goodness, strict righteousness, and most accurate wisdom altogether: as we are also concerned, in making our estimate of his ways, to consider them : and not to take our measure of what is suitable to God, by considering him according to one single attribute only; but as they all are united, in his most perfect being. And in that blessed harmony, as not to infer with him a difficulty what to do, or what'not. Which sometimes falls out with men, where there is an imperfect resemblance of those divine excel- lencies, not so exactly contempered together. As it was with that Spartan prince and general in Plutarch, when finding a necessity to march his army, and taking notice of one, for whom he had a peculiar kindness, that through extreme weakness was not possibly to be removed, he looked back upon him, expressing his sense of that exi- gency, in those emphatical words. How hard a matter is it at once iXcav Kat ippovciv, to exercise pity and be wise i God's own word misrepresents him not, but gives a true account of him, if we allow ourselves to confer it with itself, one part of it with another. Nor doth any part of it, taken alone, import him so to have willed the happiness of m.en, for any end of his, that he resolved he would, by whatsoever means, certainly effect it: as we are wont, many limes, with such eagerness to pursue ends upon which we are intent, as not to consider of right or wrong, fit or unfit, in our pursuit of them, and so let the cost ol our means, not seldom, eat up our end. Nor did that be- long to him, or was his part as our most benign, wise, and righteous Governor, to provide that we should certainly not transgress, or not suffer prejudice thereby ; but that we should not do so, through his omission of any thing, which it became him to do to prevent it. Sect. XIX. It may therefore be of some use further to take notice, that a very diverse consideration must be had, of the ends which shall be effected by GoJ's own action only, and of those which are to be brought a. out (in con- currence and subordination to his own) by the interveni- ent action of his creatures. Especially (which is more to our purpose) such of them as are intelligent, and capable of being governed by laws. As to the former sort of thevse ends, we may be confident they were all most absoluteh intended, and can never fail of being accomplished. Fo^ the latter, it cannot be luiiversally said so. For these be ing not entirely his ends ; but partly his, and partly pre scribed by him, to his reasonable creatures, to be theirs We are to conceive he always, most absolutely, intends tr do, what he righteously esteems congruous should be his own part ; which he extends and limits as seems good untc him. And sometimes, of his own good pleasure, assumes to himself the doing of so much, as shall ascertain the end , effectually procuring, that his creature shall do his pari also. That is, not only enacts his laws, and adds exhorta- tions, warnings, promises, to enforce it, but also emits that effectual influence, whereby the inferior wheels shall be put into motion, the powers and faculties of his governed creature excited and assisted, and (by a spirit in the wheels) made as the chariots of a willing people. At other times', and in other instances, he doth less, and meeting with re sistance, sooner retires ; follows not his external edicts and declarations, with so potent and determinative an influence ; a Ezek. .\xxiii. U. OF GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. Dut that the creature, tlirough his own great default, may omit to do his part, and so that end be not effected. That the course of his economy towards men on earth is, de facto ^ ordered with this diversity, seems out of ques- tion. Manifest experience shows it. Some do .^ensibly perceive that motive influence, which others do not. The same persons, at some times, find not that, which at other times they do. His own word plainly asserts it. " He works in us to will and to do, of his own good pleasure."* Where he will, he, in this respect, shows mercy ; where he will, he hardeneth, or doth not prevent but that men be hardened. And indeed, we should be constrained to rase out a great part of the Sacred Volume, if we should not admit it to he so. And as the equity and fitness of his making such difference (when it appears he doth make it) cannot without profaneness be doubted, so it is evident, from what was before said, they are far removed from the reach and confines of any reasonable doubt ; since he for- sakes none, but being first forsaken. Nor have men aaiy pretence to complain of subdolous dealing, or that they are surprisingly disappointed, and lurched of such help, as they might have expected; inasmuch as this is so plain- ly extant in God's open manifests to the world, that he uses a certain arbitrariness, especially in the more exube- rant dispensation of his grace 4 and is inserted to that purpose, that they may be cautioned not to neglect loiver assistances; and warned, because he works to will and to do of his own pleasure, therefore to work out their own salvation with fear and trembling.b Whereupon, else- where, after the most persuasive alluring invitations : Turn ye at my reproof, I will pour out mj' Spirit to you, I will make known my words to you, it is presently sub- joined. Because I called and ye refused, I stretched out my hand and no man regarded; but ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof; I also will laugh at your calamity, I will mock when your fear cometh.<= From all which it is plainly to be understood, that the general strain and drift of God''s external revelation of his mind to man, in his word, and the aspect of eveji those passages, that can, with most colour, be thought to signify any thing further, do amount to nothing more than this, that he doth so far really will the salvation of all, as not to omit the doing that which may effect it, if they be not neglectful of themselves ; but not so as to efl'ect it by that extraordinary exertion of power, which he thinks fit to employ upon some others. Nor is it reaisonably to be doubted, -(such a will being all that can be pretended to be the visible meanixig of the pa.ssages before noted,) whether there be such a will in God or no : and so somewhat really corresponding (the next thing promised to be discoursed) to the aspect and appearance hereof, which is offered to our view. For what should be the reason of the doubt % He, who best understands his own nature, having said of himself what imports no less ; why should we make a difficulty to be- lieve him "? Nor indeed can any notices we have of the perfections of the Divine nature be less liable to doubt, than what we have of his unchangeaWe veracity ; whence, as it is impossible to him to lie, it must be necessary, that he be really willing of what he hath represented himself so to be. I must here profess my dislike of the terms of that common distinction, the i-olvntas bcneplaciti, ct signi, in this present case. Under which, such as coined, and those that have much used it, have only ratlier, I doubt not, concealed a good meaning, than expressed by it an ill one. It seems, I confess, by its more obvious aspect, too much to countenance the ignominious slander, which profane and atheistical dispositions would fasten upon God, and the course of his procedure towards men ; and which it is the design of these papers to evince of as much absurdity- and folly, as it is guilty of impiety and wickedness : as though he only intended to seem willing of what he really was not ; that there was an appearance to which nothing did subessc. And then why is the latter called voluntas? un- less the meaning be he did only will the sign, which is false and impious ; and if it were true, did he not will it with the will of good pleasure *? And then the members of the distinction are confounded. Or, as if the evil actions b Phil. ii. 12, 13. 123 of men were more truly the objects of his good pleasure, than their forbearance of them. And of these faults the ap- plication of the distinction of God's secret will, and reveal- ed, unto this ca-^e, though it be u^^eful in many, is as guilty. Sect. XXI. The truth is, (unto which we must esteem ourselves obliged to adhere, both by our assent and de- fence,) that God doth really and complacentially will (and therefore doth with most unexceptionable sincei-ity declare himself to will) that to be done and enjoyed b^- many men, which he doth not, universally, will to make them do, or irresistibly procure that they shall enjoy. Which is no harder assertion, than that the impure will of degenerate, sinful man is opposite to the holy will of God ; and the malignity of man's will to the benignity of his. No harder than that there is sin and misery in the world, which how can we conceive otherwise, than as a repugnancy to the good and acceptable will of Godl Melhinks it should not be difficult to us to acknowledge, that God doth truly, and with complacency, will whatsoever is the holy, righte- ous matter of his own laws. And if it should be with any a difficulty, I would only make this supposition. What if all the Avorld were yet in innocency, yielding entire universal obedience to all the now extant laws of God, which have not reference to man as now fallen, (as those of repentance^ faith in a Mediator, &c.) would it now be a doubt with any, whether God did truly and really will, and were pleased with, the holiness and righteousness which were every where to be Ibund in the world ? Surely we would not, in this case, imagine the creature's will more pure and holy than tJie Divine ; or that he were displeased with men for their being righteous and holy. Now again, suppose the world revolted, what then is that holy will of God changed ? will we not say it remains the same holy will still ? and stands the same rule of righteousness and duty that it was ? Doth the change of his rebel creatures infer any with him'? or do only the declarations of his former will remain to be their rule, and keep them still obliged, his will itself being become another from what it was 1 Surely he might as easily have changed his laws. And if we say his will is changed, how should we know it to be so ? If we know it not, surely such a thing should not be said or thought. If we know it, how should those yet extant laws and declarations continue to oblige, again.st the Lawgiver's known will? And tlien the eas}* expedient to nullify the obligation of a la\v, that were thought too re- strictive, were to disobey it. And men might, by sinning once, license themselves to do the same thing (though ihea we could not call it sinning) always. And so the creature's should be the supreme and ruling will. Nor had it been a false suggestion, but a real truth that man, by becoming a sinner, might make himself a god. Or, if it shall be thought fit to say, that the Divine will would not, in that supposed case, be said to be changed ; but only, that now the event makes it appear not to have been what we thought it was; that were to impute both imp\irity and dissimulation to the holy, blessed God, as his fixed attri- butes. And Avhat we thought unfit, and should abhor, to imagine might have place with him one moment, to affix to him for perpetuity. Sect. XXII. And whereas it may be thought to follow hence, that hereby we ascribe to God a liablenessto frus- tration, and disappointment. That is without pretence. The resolve of the Divine will, in this matter, being not concerning the event what man shall do, but concerning his duty what he should, and concerning the connexion between his duty aud his happiness. Wliich we say he doth not only seem to will, but wills it really and truly. Nor would his prescience of the event, which we all this while assert, let frustration be so much as possible to him. Especially, it being at once foreseen, that his will, being crossed in this, would be fulfilled in so important a thing, as the preserving the decorum of his own government- AVhich had been most apparently blemished, beyond what could consist with the perfections of the Deity, if either his will concerning men's dutv, or the declarations of that will, had not been substantially the same that they are. We are, therefore, in assigningthe object of this or that act of the Divine will, to do it entirely, and to take the whole object together, without dividing it, as if the will ot c Prov. L 134 THE RECONCILEABLENESS God did wholly terminate upon what indeed is but a part (and especially if that be but a less considerable part) oi the thin? willed. In the present case, we are not to con- ceive that God, only, wills either man's duty or lelicity, or that herein his will doth solely and ultimately terminate. But in the whole, the determination of God's will is, that mail shall be duly governed, that is, congruously both to himself, and him. That such and such things, most con- gruous to both, shall be man's duty, by his doing whereof, the dignity and honour of God's own government might be pre1;erved, which was the thing principally to be de- signed, and in the first place. And, as what was secondary thereto, that hereby man's felicity should be provided for. Therefore it being foreseen a violation would be done to the sacred rights of the Divine government, by man's dis- obedience, it is resolved, they shall be repaired and main- tained by other means. So that the Divine will hath its ef- fect ; as to what was its more noble and principal design, the other part failing only by his default, whose is the loss. And if yet it should be insisted, that in asserting God to will what by his laws he hath made become man's duty, even where it is not done we shall herein ascribe to him, at least, an ineffectual and an imperfect will, as which doth not bring to pass the thing willed. It is answered, that imperfection were with no pretence imputable to the Divine will, merely for its not effecting every thing, whereto it may have a real propension. But it would be more liable to that imputation, if it should effect anything, which it were less fit for him to effect, than not to effect it. The absolute perfection of his will stands in the propor- tion, which every act of it bears, to the importance of the things about which it is conversant. Even as, with men, the perfection of any act of will is to be estimated, not by the mere peremptory sturdiness of it, but by its proportion to the goodness of the thing willed. Upon which account, a mere velleity (as many love to speak) when the degree of goodness in the object claims no more, hath uncon- ceivably greater perfection in it, than the most obstinate volition. And since the event forbids us to admit that God did ever will the obedience and felicity of all, with such a will as should be effective thereof; if yet his plain word shall be acknowledged the measure of our belief, in this matter, which so plainly asserts him someway to will the salvation of all men, 'tis strange if, hereupon, we shall not admit rather of a will not-effective of the thing will- ed, than none at all. The will of God is sufficiently to be vindicated from all imperfection, if Ave have sufficient reason for all the pro- pensions and determinations of it, whether from the value of the things willed, or from his own sovereignty who wills them." In the present case, we need not doubt to af- firm, that the obedience and felicity of all men, is of that value, as whereunto a propension of Avill, by only simple complacency, is proportionable. Yet that his not procur- ing, as to all, (by such courses as he more extraordinarily takes with some,) that they_^hall, in event, obey and be happy, is upon so mitch more valuable reasons (as there will be further occasion to show ere long) as that, not to do it was more eligible, with the higher complacency of a determinntive will. And since the public declarations of his good will, towards all men, import no more than the former, and do plainly import so much ; their correspond- ency to the matter declared is sufficiently apparent. And so is the congruity of both with his prescience of the event. For though, when God urges and incites men, by exhorta- tions, promises, and threats, to the doing of their OAvn part, (which it is most agreeable to his holy, gracious nature to do,) Jie foresee many will not be moved thereby ; but per- sist in wilful neglect and rebellions till they perish : he, at the same time, sees thai they might do otherwise, and that, if they would comply with his methods, things would otherwise issue with them. His prescience, no way, im- posing upon them a necessity to transgress. For they do it not because he foreknew it, but he only foreknew it be- cause they would do so. And hence he had, as it was ne- cessary he should have, not only this for the object of his foreknowledge that they would do amiss and perish ; but the whole case in its circumstances, that they would do so, not through his omission, but their own. And there had been no place left for this state of the case, if the public edicts and manifests had not gone forth, in this tenor, as they have. So that the consideration of his prescience being taken in, gives us only, in the whole, this state of the case, that he foresaw men would not take that course which he truly declared himself willing they should (and was graciously ready to assist them in it) in order to their own well-being. Whence all complaint of insincere deal- ing is left without pretence. Sect. XXIII. Nor (as we also undertook to show) could any course (within our prospect) have been taken, that was fit, in itself, and more agreeable to sincerity. There are only these two ways to be thought on besides ; either, that God should wholly have forborne to make overtures to men in common ; or, that he should effica- ciously have overpowered all into a compliance with them. And there is little doubt, but upon sober consideration, both of these will be judged altogether unfit. l!he former ; inasmuch as it had been most disagreeable — to the exact measures of his government, to let a race of sinful crea tures persist, through many successive ages, in apostacy and rebellion, when the characters of that law, first writ- ten in man's heart, were in so great a measure outworn, and become illegible ; without renewing the impression, in another way, and re-asserting his right and authority, as their Ruler and Lord ; — to the holiness of his nature, not to send into the world such a declaration of his will, as might be a standing testimony against the impurity whereinto it was lapsed ; — to the goodness of it, not to make known upon what terms, and for whose sake, he was reconcileable ; and — to the truth of the thing, since he really had such kind propensions towards men in common, not to make them known : — that it had, itself, been more liable to the charge of insincerity, to have concealed from men what was real truth, and of so much concernment to them. And he did, in revealing them, but act his own nature ; the goodness whereof is no more lessened, by man's refusal of its offers, than his truth can be made of none effect by their disbelief of its assertions : besides the great use such an extant revelation of the way of recovery was to be of, to those that should obediently comply with it, even after they should be won so to do. Sect. XXIV. "And the latter we may also apprehend very unfit too ; though, because that is less obvious, it re- quires to be more largely insisted on. For it would seem that if we do not effect any thing which we have a real will unto, it must proceed from impotency, and that we cannot do it, which, who would say of the great Godi Herein, therefore, we shall proceed by steps. And gradu- ally offer the things that follow to consideration. As, that it were indeed most repugnant to the notion of a Deity, to suppose any thing, which includes in it no contradiction impossible to God, considered according to that single attribute of power only. But yet we must add, that this were a very unequal way of estimating what God can do, that is, to consider him as a mere Being of power. For the notion of God so conceived, were very inadequate to him, which taken entirely, imports the com- prehension of all perfections. So that they are two very distant questions, — What the power of God alone could do 1 and — What God can do 1 And whereas to the for- mer the answer would be, — whatsoever is not in itself repugnant to be done. To the latter, it must only be, — whatsoever it becomes or is agreeable to a Being every way perfect to do. And so it is to be attributed to the excel- lency of his nature, if amongst all things not simply im- possible, there be any, which it may be truly said he can- not do. Or, it proceeds not from the imperfection of his power, but from the concurrence of all other perfections in him. Hence his own word plainly affirms of him that he cannot lie. And by common consent it will he ac- knowledged, that he cannot do any unjust act whatsoever. To this I doubt not we may with as common suffrage (when the matter is considered) subjoin, that his wisdom doth as much limit the exercise of his power, as his righte- ousness or his truth doth. And that it may with as much confidence, and clearness, be said and understood, that he cannot do an unwise or imprudent act as an unjust. Further, that as his righteousness corresponds to the jus- tice of things, to be done or not done, so doth his wisdom to the congruity or fitness. So that he cannot do what it OF GODS PRESCIENCE, &c. 125 is unfit for him to do, because lie is wise ; and because he is most perfectly and infinitely -wise, therefore nothing that is less fit. Butwhatsoever is fittest, when a coinpari;>on is made between doing this or that, or between doing and not doing, that the perfection of his nature renders neces- sary to him, and the opposite part impossible. Again, that this measure must be understood to have a very large and most general extent unto all the affairs of his government, the object it concerns being so very large. We, in our observation, may take notice, that fewer questions can occur concerning what is right or wrong, than what is fit or unfit. And whereas any man may in a moment be honest, if he have a mind to it; very few (and that by long experience) can ever attain to be wise. The things about which justice is conversant being reducible to cer- tain rules, but wisdom supposes very general knowledge of things scarce capable of such reduction. And is, besides, the primary requisite, in any one that bears rule over others: and must therefore most eminently influence all the managements of the Supreme Ruler. Sect. XXV. It is moreover to be considered, that in- numerable congruities lie open to the Infinite Wisdom, which are never obvious to our view or thought. As to a well-studied scholar, thousands of coherent notions, which an illiterate person never thought of; to a practised cour- tier, or well-educated gentleman, many decencies and inde- cencies, in the matter of civil behaviour and conversation, which an unbred rustic knows nothing of; and to an ex- perienced statesman, those importancies, which never occur to the thoughts of him who daily follows the plough. What government is there that hath not its arcana, pro- found mysteries, and reasons of state, that a vulgar wit cannot dive into 1 And from whence, the account to be given, why this or that is done or not done, is not, always, that it would have been unjust it should be otherwise, but it had been imprudent. And many things are, hereupon, judged necessary not from the exigency of justice, but reason of state. Whereupon men of modest and sober minds, that have had experience of the wisdom of their governors and their happ)' conduct, through a considerable tract of time ; when they see things done by them, the leading reasons whereof they do not understand, and the effect and success comes not yet in view, suspend their censure ; while as 5'et all seems to them obscure, and wrapt up in clouds and darkness. Yea though the course that is taken have, to their apprehension, an ill aspect. Accounting it becomes them not, to make a judgment of things so far above their reach, and confiding in the tried wisdom of their rulers, who, they believe, see reasons for what they do, into which they find themselves unable to penetrate. With how much more submiss and humble veneration, ought the methods of the Divine government to be beheld and adored, upon the certain assurance we have, *hat all things therein are managed by that wisdom, which could never in an v thing mistake its way ! Where- as, there was never any continued administration of human government, so accurate and exact, but that after some tract of lime, some or other errors might be reflected on therein. Again, it may further be said, M'ithout presuming beyond due bounds, that though infinite congruities musl be sup- po.sed to lie open to the divine understanding, which are concealed from ours, yet that these two things in the gene- ral are very manifestly congruous to any sober attentive mind, that directly concern, or mav be a]iplied to the case under our present consideration, riz. That the course of God's government over the world, be, for the most part, steady, and uniform: not interrupted by ver\' frequent, extraordinary, and anomalous actions. And again, That he use a royal liberty, of stepping out of his usual course, sometimes, as he sees meet. It cannot but appear to such as attend, highly incon- gruous, should we affirm the antithesis to either of these; or lay down counter-positions to them, and suppose the course of the Divine government to be managed agreeablj'- thereunto. Sect. XXVI. For, as fo the former; what confusion would it make in the world, if there should be perpetual innovations upon nature ; continual or exceeding frequent impeditions, and restraints of second causes. In the sphere of nature, the virtues and proper qualities of things, being never certain, could never be understood, or knowTi. In that of policy, no measures, so much as piobable, could ever be taken. How much better is it, in both, that second cau.ses ordinarily follow their inclinations! And why is it not to be thought congruous, that, in some de- gree, things should be proportionably so, in the sphere of grace 1 whereto by and by we shall speak more direct- ly. We pray, when our friends are sick, for their recovery. What can be the sober meaning and design of such prayers! Not that God would work a miracle for their restitution, (for then we might as well pray for their revival after death,) but, that God would be pleased so to co-ope- rate, in the still and silent way of nature, with second causes, and so bless means, that they may be recovered, if he see good. Otherwise that they and we may be pre- pared to undergo his pleasure. And agreeable hereto ought to be the intent of our prayers, in reference to the public affairs, and better po.sture of the world. And we may take notice, the Divine wisdom lays a ver}' great stress upon this matter, the preserving of this common order of things ; and cannot but observe a certain inflexibleness of Providence herein. And that it is very little apt to divert from its wonted course. At which weak minds are apt to take offence : to wonder, that against so many prayers and tears God will let a good man die ; or one w hom they love; or that a miracle is not wrought to prevent their own being wronged at any time; or, that the earth doth not open and swallow up the person that halh done them wrong : are apt to call for fire from heaven, upon them that are otherwise minded, and do otherwise than they would have them. But a judicious person would consider, if it be so highly reasonable that my desires should be complied with so extraordinarih^, then why not all men'sl And then were the world filled with prodigies and con- fusion. The inconveniencies would soon be to all equally discernible and intolerable : (as the heathen poet takes notice, should Jupiter's ear be over-ea.sy ;) yea, and the im- pos.sibility were obvious of gratifying all, "because of their many counter-desires. And for the other, it were no less incongruous, if the Supreme Power should so tie its own hands, and be so astricted to rules and methods, as never to do anv thing extraordinary, upon never so important occasion. How ill could the world have wanted such an effort of omnipo- tency, as the restriction upon the flames from destroying Shadrach, Meshach, and Abediiego ! or the miracles wrought in our Saviour's and the next following days! Such things are never done, but when the all-compre- hending wisdom sees it most congruous ; and that the cause will over-recompense the deflection from the common course. If no such thing did ever fall out, what a tempta- tion were it to mankind, to introduce into their belief an unintelligent fate instead of a Deity! Besides that the convincing testimony were wanting, which we see is so necessary for the confirmation of any particular revelation from God, which comes not within the compass of nature's discovery, (upon which account also, it is as apparently necessary such extraordinary works should not be over- frequent, for then they become ordinary, and useless to that special end,) so that here the exertions both of the ordinate and absolute power of God (as some distinguish) have their so appropriate, and so visibly apt and congruous, uses, that they are discernible to a very ordinary under- standing, how much more to the infinite wisdom of God ! Sect. XXVII, Now hereupon we say further, there is the like congruity, upon as valuable (thouerh not altogether the same) reasons that, in the affairs of grace, there be somewhat correspondent : that, ordinarily, it he sought and expected, in the use of ordinary means. And that, sometimes, its sovereignty show itself in preventing exer- tions; and in working so heroically, as none have, before- hand, in the neglect of its ordinary methods, any reason ic expect. And we may fitly add, that where sovereignty is pleased thus to have its exercise and demonstrate iiseli", it is sufficient that there be a general congruity. that it do so sometimes, as an antecedent reason to the doii^g of some such extraordinary things, but that there should be a par- ticular, leading congruity or antecedent reason, to invite those extraordinary operations of grace, to one person more 196 THE RECONCILE ABLENESS, &c. than another, is not necessary. But it is most congruous, that, herein, it be most arbitrary ; most agreeable to the supremacy of God; to the state of sinful man, who hath infinitely disobliged him, and can deserve nothing from him ; yea, and even to the nature of the thing. For, whcrethere is a parity, in any objects of our own choice, there can be no leading reason to this, rather than that. The most prudent man, that is wont to guide himself by never so exquisite wisdom, in his daily actions, where there is a perfect indifferency, between doing this thing or that, is not liable to censure, that he is not able to give a reason why he did that, not the other. Wisdom halh no exercise in that case. But that the blessed God doth ordinarily proceed in these affairs, by a steady rule, and sometimes show his liberty of departing from it, is to be resolved into his infinite wisdom, it being, in itself, most fit he should do both the one and the other; and therefore to him most necessary. Whereupon, the great apostle Saint Paul, dis- coursing upon the subject, doth not resolve the matter into strict justice, nor absolute sovereignly; (both which have their place too, in his proceedings with men, as the sacred writings do abundantly testify ;) but we find him in a transport, in the contemplation of the Divine wisdom, that herein so eminently shines forth. O the depths of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out ! d Sect. XXVIII. To sum up all, we conclude it obvious to the apprehension of such as consider, that it was more congruous the general course of God's government over man should be by moral instruments. And howsoever it were very unreasonable to imagine, that God cannot in any case extraordinarily oversway tlie inclinations, and determine the will of such a creature, in a way agreeable enough to its nature, (though we particularly know not, as we are not concerned to know, or curiously to inquire in what way,) and highly reasonable to admit that in many cases he doth. It is notwithstanding manifest, to any sober reason, that it were very incongruous, this should be the ordinary course of his conduct towards mankind, or the same persons at all times. That is, that a whole order of intelligent creatures should be moved only by inward impulses ; that God's precepts, promises, and commina- tions, whereof their nature is capable, should be all made impertinencies, through his constant ov^erpowering those that should neglect them ; that the faculties, whereby men are capable of moral government, should be rendered, to this purpose, useless and vain ; and that they should be tempted to expect to be constantly managed as mere ma- chines, that know not their own use. Nor is it less apprehensible, how incongruous it were also, on the other hand, to suppose that the exterior frame of God's government should be totally unaccompanied with an internal vital energy; or exclude the inward mo- tions, operations, and influences, whereof such a creature is also fitly capable; or that God should have barred out himself from all inward access to the .spirits of men, or commerce, with them : that the supreme, universal, pater- nal Mind (as a heathen called it) should have no way for efficacious communications to his own offspring, when he pleases ; that so (unsuitably to sovereignty) he should have no objects of special favour, or no peculiar ways of ex- pressing it. It is manifestly congruous that the Divine government over man, should be (as it is) mixed or com- posed of an external frame of laws, with their proper sanc- tions and inforcements, and an internal effusion of power and vital influence, correspondent to the several parts of that frame ; and which might animate the whole, and use it, as instrumental, to the begetting of correspondent im- pressions on men's spirits; — that this power be put forth, not like that of a natural agent, ad uUimum, (which if we would suppose the Divine power to be, new worlds must be springing up every moment,) but gradually, and with an apt contemperation to the subject, upon which it is de- signed ; to have its operations and withal arbitrarily, as is becoming the great Agent from whom it proceeds, and to whom it therefore belongs to measure its exertions, as il Rom xi. 33. See to the sarao purpose, ch xvi. 25, 26, 27. and Eph. i. 5,6, 7 with the 8th. seems meet unto him: — that it be constant.y put forth (though most gratuitously, especially the disoldigation of the apostacy being considered) upon all to that degi ee, as that they be enabled to do much good, to which they are not impelled by it : — that it be ever ready (since it is the power of grace) to go forth in a further degree than it had yet done, wheresoever any former issues of it have been duly complied with. Though it be so little supposable that man should hereby have obliged God thereto, that he lialh not any way obliged himself, oiherwi.se, than that he hath implied a readiness to impart unto man what shall be ne- cessary to enable him to obey, so far as, upon the apostacy, is requisite to his relief: if he seriously endeavour to do his own part, by the power he already hath received. Agree- ably to the common saying, hovtini facienti qvod in se est, 4-c. That, according to the royal liberty wherewith it works it go forth, as to some, with that efficacy, as not- withstanding whatever resistance, yet to overcome, and make them captives to the authority and love of Christ. Sect. XXIX. The universal, continued rectitude of all intelligent creatures had, we may be sure, been willed with a peremptory, efficacious Avill, if it had been best. That is, if it had not been less congruous than to keep them sometime (under the expectation of future confirma- tion and reward) upon trial of their fidelity, and in a state wherein it might not be impossible to them to make a de- fection. And so it had easily been prevented, that ever there should have been an apostacy from God, or any sin in the world. Nor was il either less easy, by a mighty irresistible hand, universally to expel sin, than prevent it; or more necessary or more to be expected from him. But if God's taking no such course, tended to render his go- vernment over the world more august and awful for the present, and the result and final issue of all things more glorious at length, and Avere consequently more congru- ous ; that could not be so Avilled, as to be effectually pro- cured by hiin. For whatsoever obligation strict justice hath upon us, that congruity cannot but have upon him. And whereas it would be concluded, that whatsoever any one truly wills, they would effect if they could, we admit it for true, and to be applied in the present ca.se. But add. That as we righly esteem that impossible to us, which we cannot justly do, so is that to him, not only which he cannot do justly, but which, upon the whole matter, he cannot do most wisely also. That is, which his infinite wisdom dolh not dictate is most congruous and fit to be done. Things cohere and are held together, in the course of his dispensation, by congruities as by adamantine bands, and cannot be otherwise. That is, comparing and taking things together, especially the most important. For other- wise, to have been nicely curious about every minute thing, singly considered, that it might not possibly have been iDeiler, (as in the frame of this or that individual ani- mal or the like,) had been needlessly to interrupt the course of nature, and therefore, itself, to him an incongru- ity. And dolh, in them that expect it, import more of a trifling disposition than of true wisdom. But to him whose being is most absolutely perfect, to do that which, all things considered, would be simply best, i. e. most becoming him, most honourable and Godlike, is abso- lutely necessary. And consequently, it is to be attributed to his infinite perfection, that, unto him, to do otherwise, is absolutely impossible. And if we yet see not all these congruities which, to him, are more than a law ; it is enough that they are obvious to his own eye, who is the only competent Judge. Yet, moreover, it is finally to be considered, that the methods of the Divine government are, besides his, to be exposed to the view and judgment of other intellects than our own, and we expect they should to our own, in another state. What conception thereof is, already, received and formed in our minds, is but an em- bryo, no less imperfect than our present state is. It were very unreasonable to expect, since this world shall continue but a little while, that all God's manage- ments, and ways of procedure, in ordering the great affairs of it, should be attempered and fitted to the judgment that shall be made of them in this temporary slate, that A POSTSCRIPT TO THE LATE LETTER, &c. 127 will so soon be over; and to the present apprehension and capacity of our now so muddied and distempered minds. A vasi and stable eternity remains, wherein the whole ce- lestial chorus shall entertain themselves with the grateful contemplation and applause of his deep counsels. Such things as now seem perplex and intricate to us, will appear most irreprehensibly fair and comely to angeli- cal minds, and our own, when we shall be vouchsafed a place amongst that happy community. What discovery God affords of his own glorious excellencies and perfec- tions, is principally intended to recommend him in that state wherein he, and all his ways and works, are to be beheld with everlasting and most complacential approba- tion. Therefore though now we should covet the clearest and most satisfying account of things that can be had, we are yet to exercise patience, and not precipitate our judg- ment of them before the time: as knowing our present conceptions will differ more from what they will be here- after, than those of a child from the maturer thoughts of the wisest man. And that many of our conceits, M'hich we thought wise, we shall then see cause to put away childish things. The disorder. Sir, of this heap rather than frame of thoughts and discourse, as it cannot be thought more un- .suitable to the .subject, than suitable to the author ; and the less displease, by how much it could less be expected to be otherwise, from him, even in the best circumstances; so it may lay .some claim to your ea.sier pardon, as having been, mostly, huddled up in the intervals of a troublesome, long journey. Wherein he was rather willing to lake what opportunity the inconveniences and hurry of it could allow him, than neglect any, of using the earliest endeavour to approve himself, as he is your great admirer, Most honoured Sir, Your most obedient Immble servant, H. W. A POSTSCRIPT TO THE LATE LETTER OF THE RECONCILEABLENESS OF GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. Finding that this discourse of the reconcilcablcriess of God's prescience of the sins of vien, with the icisdom and, sincerity of his counsels, exhortations, (f-c. ha'.h been mis- understood and misrepresented ; I think it requisite to say somewhat briefly in reference thereto. I wrote it upon the motion of that honourable gentleman to whom it is in- scribed ; who apprehended somewhat of that kind might be of use to render our religion less exceptionable to some persons of an inquiring disposition, that might perhaps be too sceptical and pendulous, if not prejudiced. Having finished it, I thought it best the author's name should pass under some disguise, supposing it might .so better serve its end : for knowing my name could not give the cause an advantage, I was not willing it should be in a possibility of making it incur any disadvantage. And therefore, as I have observed some, in such cases, to make use only of the two last letters, I imitated some other, in the choice of the pcn^uUimate . But perceiving that dis- course now to fall under animadversion, I reckon it be- coming to be no longer concealed. It was unavoidable to me, if I would, upon reasonable terms, apply myself to the consideration of the matter I had undertaken, of showing the consistency of God's prescience of the sins of men, with the preventive methods we find him to have used against them, to express .somewhat of my sense of (what I well knew to have been asserted by divers school- men) God's predeterminative concurrence to the sins of men also. For it had been (any one may see) very idle and ludicrous trifling, to offer at reconciling those methods with God's prescience, and have waived that manifestly greater diSiculty of J'econciling them with his predetermi- native concourse, if I had thought there had been such a thing. And were a like case, as if a chirurgeon, under- talring a wounded person, should apply himself, with a great deal of diligence and address, to the cure of a finger slightly .scratched; and totally neglect a wound feared to be mortal in his breast. And whereas I reckoned God's prescience of all what- soever futurities, and consequently of the sins of men, most certain and demonstrable, (though it was not the business of this discourse to demonstrate it, but, supposing it, to show its reconcileableness with what it seemed not so well to agree,) if I had believed his predeterminative concurrence to the sins of men to be as certain ; perfect despair of being able to say any thing to purpose in this case, had made me resolve lo say nothing in either. For. to show how it might stand with the wisdom and sincerity of the blessed God, to counsel men not to sin, to profess his hatred and detestation of it, to remonstrate to men the great danger they should incur by it ; with so great ap- pearance of seriousness to exhort, warn, expostulate with them concerning it, express his great displeasure and grief for their sinning, and consequent miseries; and yet all the while act them on thereto, by a secret, but might)' and irresistible, influence, seemed to me an utterly hopeless and impossible undertaking. The other, without this, (supposing, as *o this, the case to have been as some have thought it.) a very vain one. But being well assured, thai what seemed the greater difficulty, and to carry most of terror and affright in the face of it, was only a chimera; I reckoned the other very superable, and therefore directed my discourse thither, according to the first design of it, which was in effect but to justify God's making such a creature as man, and governing him agreeably to his nature. Now judging it requisite, that he who should read tha' discourse concerning this designed subject, with any aa vantage, should have the same thoughts of the other which was waived, that I had ; I apprehended it necessarj' to communicate those thoughts concerning that, as I did. Not operosely, and as my business, but only on the bye, and asAvas fit in reference to a thing that was to he waived, and not insisted on. Now I perceive that some persons, who had formerly entertained that strange opinion of God's predeterminative concurrence to the wickedest ac- tions, and not purged their minds of it, have been offended with that letter, for not expressing more respect unto it. And yet offered nothing themselves, (which to me seems exceedinar strange,) for the solving of that great difficulty and encumbrance, which it infers upon our religion. Nor do I much wonder, that this opinion of predeterminative concourse, to sinful actions, should have some stiff ad- herents among ourselves. For having been entertained by certain Dominicans, that were apprehended in some things to approach nearer us, than others of the Roman church ; it came to receive favotir and countenance from some of our own, of considerable note for piety and learning, whose 128 A POSTSCRIPT TO THE name and authority cannot but be expected to have iiiiicli influence on ihe minds of many. Knt I .somewhat wonder, that they who have had no kindnes.s for thi.s letter, upon the account of it.s di.s.sent from them, in this par- ticular, .should not allow it common justice. For because it hath not said every thing they would have had it say, and that would have been grateful to them.selves, tliey im{)ule to it the having said what it said not, and what they appreliended would be most ungrateful to all pious and sober men. The sum is, they give out concerning it, that it denies the providence of God about sin, which all good men ought to abhor from; and insinuate that it falls in with the sentiments of Durandus, which they know maiiv think not well of. All thai I intend to do, for the present, upon this oc- ca,sion, shall be to show wherein the letter is misrepre- sented, and charged with what it hath not in it. To remark what is .said against that supposed sense of it, and give the true sense of what it says touching this matter; with a further account of the author'.s mind herein than it was thought fit to insert into .so transient and occasional a ' The other, though he also excludes not the immediate efficacy of God in reference to the actions of men, yet is so far from making it determinative, that ihe reason he gives why, in evil actions, man sins, and God does not, is that the one of those causes posset rcctitudinem dare actui qvam tenctur dare: ct tamen non dut. Alia autem, licet non tencotiir cam dare: tamen quantvvi est ex se daret, sivohintas creata co-nperarclur ; ' in the veiy place which himself refers to. Wherein they dift'er from this author toto ca;lo, and from me, in that they make not deter- minative influence necessary in reference to good actions, which I expressly do. Thus far it may be seen what pretence or colour he had to make my opinions the same with Durandus's, or his own the same with that of Thomas and Scotus. But if he knew in what esteem I have the schoolmen, he would hardly believe me likely to step one foot out of my way, either to gain the reputation of any of their names, or avoid the disreputation. He, notwithstanding, supposed his own reputation to be so good (and I know no reason why he might not suppose so) as to make it be believed 1 was any thing he pleased to call me, by such as had not opportunity to be otherwise informed. And thus 1 would take leave of him, and permit him to use his own reflections upon his usage of me, at his own leisure ; but that civility bids me (since he is pleased to be at the pains of catechising me) first to give some answer to the questions wherein he thus expostulates with me. CI. 1. Whether there be any action of man on earth so good, which hath not some mixture of sin in if? And if God concur lo the substrate matter of it as good, must he not necessarily concur to the substrate matter as sinful 1 For is not the substrate matter of the act, boih as good and sinful, the same 1 A. 1. It seems then, that God doth concur to the matter of an action as .sinful. Which is honestly acknowledged, since by his principles it cannot be denied; though most d la Q. 83. c L. 2. Dist. 27. Q. 2. 130 A POSTSCRIPT TO THE of hh way mince the business, and say the concurrence is only to the action which is sinful, not as sinful. 2. This I am to consider as an argument fur God's pre- determinalive concurrence to wicked actions. And thus it must be conceived : That if God concur by determinative influence to the imperfectly good actions of faith, repent- ance, lov^e to himself, prayer ; therefore to the acts of en- mity against himself, cursing, idolatry, blasphemy, &c. And is it not a mighty consequence 1 If to actions that are good quoad substantiam, therefore to such as are in the substance of them evil 1 We ourselves can, in a remoter kind, concur to the actions of others : because you nray afford, yourself, your leading concurrence to actions im- perfectly good, therefore may you to them that are down- right evil 1 because to prayer, therefore to cursing and swearing 1 and then ruin men for the actions you induced .hem to 1 You will say, God may rather, but sure he can much less do so than you. How could you be serious in .he proposal of this question 1 We are at a loss how it should consist with the Divine wisdom, justice, goodness, and truth, to design the punish- ing man, yet innocent, with everlasting torments, for ac- tions which God, himself, would irresistibly move him to ; whereas his making a covenant with Adam in reference ■.0 himself and his posterity, implied there was a possibility it might be kept; at least that he would not make the keeping of it, by his own positive influence, impossible. And you say, if he might concur to the substrate matter of an action as good, (which tends to man's salvation and blessedness,) he must necessarily concur (and that by an .rresistible determinative influence, else you say nothing 10 me) to the substrate matter of all their evil actions, as 2vil, which tend to their ruin and misery, brought upon '.hem by the actions which God makes them do. I sup- pose St' Luke vi. 9. with Hos. xiii. 9. show a ditference. If you therefore ask me, why I should not admit this conse- quence 1 I say it needs no otlier answer, than that I take wisdom, righteousness, goodness, and truth, to belong more to the idea of God, than their contraries. CL. 3. Is there any action so sinful that hath not some natural good as the substrate matter thereof? A. True. And what shall be inferred 1 That therefore God must by a determinative influence produce every such action whatsoever reason there be against it % You might better argue thence the necessity of his producing, every hour, a new world; in which there would be a great deal more of positive entity, and natural goodness. Cer- tainly the natural goodness that is in the entity of an action, is no such invitation to the holy God by determinative influence to produce it, as that he should offer violence to his own nature, and stain the justice and honour of his government, by making it be done, and then punish it being done. Q,. 3. Do we not cut off the most illustrious part of Divine Providence in governing the lower world, &c. ? A. What 1 by denying that 'tis the stated way of God's government, to urge men, irresistibly, to all that wicked- ness, for which he will afterwards punish them with ever- lasting torments 1 I should least of all ever have expected such a question to this purpose, and am ashamed further to answer it. Only name any act of providence, I hereby deny, if you can. In the next place, that my sense may appear in my own words ; and that I may show how far I am of the same mind with those that apprehend me at so vast a distance from them; and where, if they go fur- ther, our parting point must be ; I shall set down the par- ticulars of my agreement with them, and do it in no other heads than they might have collected, if they had pleased, out of that letter. As, 1. That God exerciseth a universal providence about all his creatures, both in sustaining and governing them. 2. That, more particularly, he exerciseth such a provi- dence about man. 3. That this providence about man extends to all the actions of all men. 4. That it consists not alone in beholding the actions of men, as if he were a mere spectator of them only, but is positively active about them. 5. That this active providence of God about all the actions of men consists not merely in giving them the natu- ral powers, whereby they can work of themselves, but in a real influence upon those powers. 6. That this influence is in reference to holy and spirit- ual actions (whereto since the apostacy the nature of man is become viciously disinclined) necessary to be effica- ciously determinative; such as shall overcome that disin- clination, and redirce those powers into act. 7. That the ordinary, appointed way for the communi- cation of this determinative influence, is by our intervening consideration of the inducements which God represents to us in his word, viz. the precepts, promises, and commina- tions, which are the moral instruments of his government. No doubt but he may (as is intimated in the letter) extra- ordinarily act men in some rarer cases, by inward impulse, without the help of such external means, as he did pro- phets or inspired persons ; and when he hath done so, we were not to think he treated them unagreeably to their natures, or so as their natures could not, without violence, admit. But it hath been the care and designment of the Divine wisdom, so to order the way of dispensation to- wards the several sorts of creatures, as not only not, ordi- narily, to impose upon them what they could not conve- niently be patient of, but so as that their poM'ers and faculties might be put upon the exercises whereof they were capable, and to provide that neither their passive capacity should he overcharged, nor their active be unem- ployed. And whereas the reasonable nature of man renders him not only susceptible of unexpected internal impres- sions, but also capaole of being governed by laws, which requires the use of his own endeavour to understand and obey them; and whereas we also find such laws are actu- ally made for him, and propounded to him with their prc>- per enforcements. If it should be the fixed course of God's government over him, only to guide him by inward im- pulses ; this (as is said in that letter) would render those laws and their sanctions impertinencies, his faculties whereby he is capable of moral government so far, and to this purpose, useless and vain ; and would be an occa- sion, which the depraved nature of man would be very apt to abuse into a temptation to them, never to bind their powers to the endeavour of doing any thing that were of a holy and spiritual tendency, (from which their aver- sion would be always prompting them to devise excuses,) more than a mere machine would apply itself to the uses which it was made for and doth not understand. Therefore, lest any should be so unreasonable, as to ex- pect God should only surprise them,Avhile they resolvedly sit still and sleep; he hath, in his infinite wisdom, with- held from them the occa' ion hereof; and left them desti- tute of any encouragement (whatsoever his extraordinary dealings may have been with some) to expect his influ- ences, in the neglect of his ordinary methods, as is dis- coursed p. 121. and at large in the following pases. And which is the plain sense of that admonition, Phil. ii. 12, 13. Yea, and though there be never so many instances of merciful surprisals, preventive of all our own considera- tion and care, yet those are still to be accounted the ordi- nary methods which are so dc jure, which would actually be so, if men did their duty, and which God hath obliged us to observe and attend unto as such. 8. That in reference to all other actions which are no; sinful, though there be not a sinful disinclination to them, yet because there may be a sluggishness and ineptitude to some purposes God intends to serve by them, this influ- ence is also always determinative thereunto; whensoever to the immense wisdom of God shall seem meet, and con- ducing to his own great and holy ends. 9. That, in reference to sinful actions, by this influence God doth not only sustain men who do them, and con- tinue to them their natural faculties and powers, whereby they are done, but also, as the first mover, so far excite and actuate those powers, as that they are apt and habile for any congenerous action, to which they have a natural designation ; and whereto they are not sinfully disin- clined. 10. That, if men do then employ them to the doing of any sinful action ; by that same influence, he doth, as to him seems meet, limit, moderate, and, against the inclina- tion and design of the sinful agent, overrule and dispose it to good. But now if, besides all this, they will also LETTER ON GOD'S PRESCIENCE, &c. 131 assert; that God doth, by an efflcacious influence, move and determine men to wicked actions. This is that which I most resolvedly deny. Tliat is, in this I shall ditfer with them, that I do not suppose God to have, by in- ternal influence, as far a hand in the worst and wickedest actions, as in the best. I assert more to be necessary to actions to which men are wickedly disinclined ; but that less will suffice for their doing of actions to which they have inclination more than enough. I reckon it sufficient to the production of this latter sort of actions, that their powers be actually habile, and apt for any such action, in the general, as is connatural to them ; supposing there be not a peccant aversion, as there is to all those actions that are holy and spiritual ; which aversion a more potent (even a determinative) influence is necessary to overcome. I explain myself by instance. A man hath from God the powers belonging to his na- ture, by which he is capable of loving or hating an appre- hended good or evil. These powers being, by a present Divine influence, rendered habile, and apt for action; he can now love a good name, health, ease, life, and hate dis- grace, sickness, pain, death : but he doth also by these powers, thus habilitated for action, love wickedness, and hate God. I say, now, that to those former acts God should over and besides determine him, is not absolutely and always necessary ; and to the latter, is impossible. But that, to hate wickedness universally, and as such, and to love God, the depravedness of his nature, by the apos- tacy, hath made the determinative influence of efficacious grace necessary. Which, therrfore, he hath indispensable obligation (nor is destitute of encouragement) earnestly to implore and pray for. My meaning is noAV plain to such as have a mind to understand it. Having thus given an account wherein I agree Avith them, and wherein, if they please, I must differ. It may perhaps be expected I should add further reasons of that difference on my part. But I ;hall for the present forbear to do it. I know it may be alleged, that some very pious as well as learned men have been of their opinion. And I seriously believe it. But that signifies nothing to the goodness of the opinion. Nor doth the badness of it ex- tinguish my charity nor reverence towards the men. For I consider, that as many hold the most important truths, and which most directly tend to impress the image of God upon their souls, that yet are never stamped with any such impression thereby ; so, it is not impossible some may have held v^ery dangerous opinions, with a notional judgment, the pernicious influence wheieof hath never distilled upon their hearts. Neither shall I be willing without necessity to detect other men's infirmities. Yet if I find myself any way obliged further to intermeddle in this matter. I reckou the time I have to spend in this world, can never be spent to better purpose, than in discovering the fearful conse- quences of that rejected opinion, the vanity of the subter- fuges whereby its assertors think to hide the malignity of it ; and the ineflicacy of the arguments brought for it. Especially those two which the letter takes notice of. For as so ill-coloured an opinion ought never to be admitted without the most apparent necessity, so do I think it most apparent there is no necessity it should be admitted upon those grounds or any other. And doubt not but that both the governing providence of God in reference to all events whatsoever, and his most certain foreknowledge of them all, may be defended, against all opposers, without it. But I had rather my preparations to these purposes should be buried in dust and silence; than I should ever see the occasion which should carry the signification with it of their being at all needful. And I shall take it for a just and most deplorable occasion, if I shall find any to assert against me the contradictory to this proposition : — That doth not by an efficacious influence, universally move and determine men to all their actions ; even those that are most wicked. — Which is the only true and plain meaning of what was said, about this ousiness, in the before-men- tioned letter. MA N'S CREATION A HOLY BUT MUTABLE STATE. 1 ECCLES. VII. 29. LO, THIS ONLY HAVE I FOUND, THAT GOD HATH MADE MAN UPRIGHT ; TUT THEY HAVE SOUGHT OUT MANY INTENTIONS. In these words you have the result of a serious inquiry into the state of mankind. In the verse immediately fore- going, the preacher speaks his own experience, touching each sex distributively ; how rare it was to meet with a wise and good man, how much rarer with a prudent and virtuous woman ; (so he must be understood, though these qualities are not expressed;) then in the text gives this verdict touching both collectively, tending to acquit their Maker of their universal depravation, and convict them. " Lo, this only have I found," &e. The words contain two propositions. — The first touching man's perfection by his creation, " God made," &c. The second touching his defection by sin, " But they have sought," &c. Together with a solemn preface introducing both, and recommending them as well-weighed truths, " Lo, this only have I found," &c. q. d. " I do not now speak at random, and by guess ; no, but I solemnly pronounce it, as that which I have found out by serious study and dili- gent exploration, that God made man upright," &c. The terms are not obscure, and are fitly rendered. I find no considerable variety of readings, and cannot needlessly spend time about words. Only in short, — By man you must understand man collectively, so as to comprehend the whole species. — Making him upright, you must under- stand so as to refer malcing not to the adjunct onlv, supposing the subject pre-existent, but to both subject and adjunct together; and so 'tis man's concreate and original righteousness that is here meant. — By i?ivcntions under- stand (as the antithesis doth direct) such as are alien from this rectitude. Nor is it altogether improbable that in this expression, some reference may be had to that curious de- sire of knowing much that tempted Adam and Eve into the first transgression. — Many inventions, seems to be spo- ken in opposition to that simplicity and singleness of heart which this original rectitude did include ; truth is but one ; falsehood, manifold. God made man upright, i.e. simple, plain-hearted, free from all tortuous windings, and invo- lutions. (So the word rendered upright in the text doth signify ; and Jeshurun derived therefrom, which God thought a fit name for his people Israel, the seed of plain- hearted Jacob, to be known by; answerably whereto Na- thanael is said to be a true Israelite,'' in whom was no guile.) Such man was at first; now, in the room of this simplicity, you find a multiplicity : he was of one constant, uniform frame and tenorof spirit, held one straight, direct, and even course; now he is become full of inventions, grown vafrons, multiform as to the frame of his spirit, im- certain, intricate, perplexed in all his ways. — Sought out, this notes the voluntariness, and perfect spontaneity of his defection ; 'twas his own doing. God made him upright ; he hath sought out means to deform and undo himself. — The words thus opened afford us two great go.spel truths. Doct. 1. That God endued the nature of man, in his creation, with a perfect and universal rectitude. 2. That man's defection from his primitive state was Eurely voluntary, and from the unconstrained choice of is own mutable and self-determining will. (Though the latter part of the text would afford a suf- ficient ground to treat of the state of man now fallen ; yet that being by agreement left to another hand, I observe no more from it than what concerns the manner of his fall, and that only as it depended on a mutable will.) In handling these truths, I shall, 1. Open them in certain explicatory theses. 2. Improve them in some few practical and applicatory inferences. 1. About the former — that God endued, &c. — take these propositions for explication. Prop. I. All created rectitude consists in conformity lo some rule or law. Rectitude is a mere relative thing, and its relation is lo a rule. By a rule, I here mean a law strictly taken ; and therefore I speak this only of created rectitude. A law, is a rule of duty given by a superior to an inferior ; nothing can be in that sense a rule to God, or the measure of increated rectitude. Prop. 2. The highest rule of all created rectitude, is the will of God, considered as including most intrinsically an eternal and immutable reason, justice, and goodness. 'Tis certain, there can be no higher rule to creatures than the Divine will ;b and as certain that the government of God over his creatures, is always reasonable, and just, and gracious; and that this reasonableness, justice, and good- ness, by which it is so, should be subjected any where but in God himself, none that know what God is, according to our more obvious notions of him, can possibly think. Prop. 3. Any sufficient signification of this will, touch- ing the reasonable creature's dnty, is a law, indispensably obliging such a creature. A law is a constitution de debito, and 'tis the legislator's will (not concealed in his own breast, but) duly expressed that makes this constitution, and infers an obligation on the subject. Prop. 4. The law given to Adam at his creation wa.s partly natural, given by way of internal impression upon his soul ; partly positive, given (as is probable) by some more external discovery or revelation. That the main body of law, whereby man was to be governed, should be at first given no other way than by stamping them upon his mind and heart, was a thing congrnous enough to his innocent state ; (as it is to angels and saints in glory ;) it being then exactly contempered to his nature, highly ap- provable to his reason, (as is evident, in that being fallen, his reason ceases not to approve it, Rom. ii. 18.) fully suitable to the inclination and tendency of his will, and not at all regretted by any reluctant principle that might in the least oppose or render him doubtful about his duty, b Rom. vii. IS. xii. 1, 2. Ezck. n-iii. 25. chap, xxxiii. MAN CREATED MUTABLE. 133 Yet was it most reasonable also, that some positive commands should be superadded, that God's right of do- minion and government over him as Creator, might be more expressly asserted, and he might more fully appre- hend his own obligation as a creature to do some things, because it was his Maker's will, as well as others, because they appeared to him in their own nature reasonable and fit to be done ; for so the whole of what God requires of man, is fitly distinguished into some things which he com- mands because they are just, and some things that are just because he commands them. Prop. 5. Adam was endued in his creation with a suf- ficient ability and habitude to conform to this whole law, both natural and positive; in which ability and habitude his original recitude did consist. This proposition carries in it the main truth we have now in hand, therefore re- quires to be more distinctly insisted on. There are two things in it to be considered — the thing itself he was en- dued with — the manner of the endowment. 1. The thing itself wherewith he was endued. That was uprightness, rectitude, (otherwise called the image of God, though that expression comprehends more than we now speak of, as his immortality, dominion over the in- ferior creatures, »&c.) which uprightness or rectitude con- sisted in the habitual conformity, or conformability, of all his natural powers to this whole law of God ; and is there- fore considerable two ways, viz. in relation to its subject, and its rule. 1. In relation to its subject ; that was the whole soul, (ia some sense it may be said the whole man,) even the several powers of it. And here we are led to consider the parts of this rectitude, for 'tis co-extended (if that phrase may be allowed) with its subject, and lies spread out into the several powers of the soul ; for had any power been left destitute of it, such is the frame of man, and the de- pendence of his natural powers on each other, in order to action, that it had disabled him to obey, and had destroyed his rectitude ; for bonum non oritur nisi ex causis integris, malum vero ex quovis defectu. And hence (as Davenanf^ well observes) according to the parts (if I may so speak) of the subject wherein it was, man's original rectitude must be understood to consist of, 1. A perfect illumination of mind to understand and imow the will of God. 2. A compliance of heart and will therewith. 3. An obedient subordination of the sensitive appetite, and other inferior powers, that in nothing they might resist the former. That it comprehends all these, appears by comparing Col. iii. 10. where the image of God, wherein man was created, is said to consist in know- ledge, that hath its seat and subject in the mind, with Eph. iv. 24. where righteousness and holiness are also mention- ed; the one whereof consists in equity towards men, the other in loyalty and devotedness to God ; both which neces- sarily suppose the due framing of the other powers of the soul, to the ducture of an enlightened mind And besides, that work of sanctification (which in these scriptures is expressly called a renovation of man according to the im- age of God wherein he was created) doth in other scrip- tures appear (a.s the forementioned author also observes) to consist of parts proportionable to these I mention, riz. illumination of mind, Ephes. i. 18. conversion of heart, Ps. li. 10. victory over concupiscence, Rom. vi. 7, throughout. 2. Consider this recitude in relation to its rule ; that is, the will of God revealed,d or the law of God. Sin is the transgression of the law ; and accordingly righteousness must needs be conformity to the law ; viz. actual righte- ousness consists in actual conformity to the law ; that habitual rectitude which Adam was furnished with in his creation, (of which we are speaking,) in an habitual con- formity, or an ability to conform to the same law. This habitual conformity was, as of the whole soul, so to the whole law, i. e. to both, the parts or kinds of it, natural and positive. He was furnished with particular princi- ples, inclining him to comply with whatsoever the law of nature had laid before him ; and with a general principle, disposing him to jield to whatsoever any positive law should lay before him as the will of God. And if it be said, c Davcnant de justitiahabituali, &c. d 1 John iii. 4. e Aquin. Sumin. f Aug. de civitate Dei. e 1 Kings viii. 46. Psal. xiv. l. Rom. iii. 12, &c. cap. v. 12, 13, &c. 1 John V. 19, &c. 13 (in reference to the former of these,) that this law of na- ture impressed upon Adam's soul, was his very rectitude; therefore how can this rectitude be a conformity to this law? I answer, 1. A law is twofold, regnlans, regulator. * •2. The law of nature impressed upon the .soul of Adam, must be considered; — 1. as subjected in his mind; soil consisted of certain practical notions about good and evil, right and wrong, &c.— 2. as subjected in his heart, so it consisted in certain habitual inclinations to conform to those principles. Now these inclinations of the heart, though they are a rule to actions, thej' are yet something ruled in reference to those notions in the mind ; and their conformity thereto makes one part of original rectitude. And those notions, though they are a rule to these inclina- tions, yet they are something ruled in reference to the will of God signified by them ; and in the conformity thereto, consists another part of this original rectitude. 2. We have to consider the manner of this endowment. And as to this, 'tis much disputed among the schoolmen, whether it were natural or supernatural. I shall only lay down, in few words, what I conceive to be clear and in- disputable. 1. If by natural, you mean essential, (whether constitu- tively, or consecutively,) so original righteousness was not natural to man ; for then he could never have lost it, without the loss of his being. 2. If by natural, you mean connatural, i. e. concreate with the nature of man, and consonant thereto, so I doubt not but it was natural to him. Prop. 6. This rectitude of man's nature, could not but infer and include his actual blessedness, while he should act according to it. According to the tenor of the cove- nant, it could not but infer it. And consider this rectitude in itself, it must needs include it : the rectitude of his un- derstanding including his knowledge of the highest good; and the rectitude of his will and affections, the accept- ance and enjoj'ment thereof; as Augustine f in this case, nullum bonum abcssct hoviini quod recta voluntas optare posset, cf-c. Thus far of the holiness and blessedness of man's first state. It follows to speak of the matability of it, and of his fall as depending thereon. Doct. 2. That man's defection from his primitive state was merely voluntary, and from the unconstrained choice of his own mutable and self-determining will. For the asserting of this truth, take the following propositions: Prop. 1. That the nature of man is now become uni- versally depraved and sinful. This, Scripture is full of,? and experience and common observation puts it beyond dispute. 'Tis left then that sin must have had some ori- ginal among men. Prop. 2. The pure and holy nature of God could never be the original of man's sin. This is evident in ii.'^elf. God h disclaims it: nor can any affirm it of him without denying his very Being. He could not be the cause of unholiness, but by ceasing to be holy, which would sup- pose him mutably holy ; and if either God or man must be confessed mutable, 'tis no difficulty where to lay it; whatever he is, he is essentially; and necessity of exist- ence, of being alwavs what heis, i remains everlastingly the fundamental attribute of his Being. 3. 'Tis blasphemous and absurd to talk of two princi- ples, (as the Manichees of old.) the one good per se, and the cause of all good ; the other evil per sc, and the cause of all evil. Bradwardine's k two arguments, 1. that this would sup- pose two gods, two independent beings, 2. that it would suppose an evil god, do sufficiently convince this to be full both of blasphemy and contradiction. 4. It was not possible that either external objects, or the temptation of the devil, should necessitate the will of man to sin. External objects could not ; for that were to reject all upon God ; for if he create objects with such an aliective power in them, and create such an appetite in man as cannot but work inordinately and sinfully towards those objects, it must needs infer his efficacious necessita- tion of sin, being it would destroy the truth already estab- lished, that God created man with such a rectitude as that h Deut. xxxii. 4. Psal. v. 4. 3 John 11. i James i 17. k Bradwardine de causa Dei. 134 MAN CREATED MUTABLE. there was a siifficient ability in his superior powers for the cohibition and restraint of the inferior, that they should not work inordinately towards their objects. The devil could not do it for the same reason, having no way to move the will of man but by the proposal of objects; yet that by this means (which he could in many respects manag-e most advantageously) he did much help forward the first sin, Scripture leaves us not to doubt. 5. The whole nature of sin consisting only in a defect, no other cause need be designed of it than a defective ; i.e. an understanding, will, and inferior powers, however originally good, yet mutably and defectively so. I shall not insist to prove that sin is no positive being; but I take the argument to be irrefragable, (notwithstanding the cavils made against it,) that is drawn from that com- mon maxim, that ovine ens positivum est vel primum, vel a primoA And that of Dionysius the Areopagite is an in- genious one : he argues that no being can be evil per se ; for then it must be immutably, to which no evil can be, for to be always the same, is a certain property of goodness; 'tis so even of the highest goodness. And hence sin being supposed only a defect, a soul that is only defectibly holy, might well enough be the cause of it; i. e. the deficient cause. Nor is it in the least strange that man should be at first created with a defectible holiness ; for if he were immutably holy, either it must be ex natitrd, or ex gratia: ex naturd it could not be, for that would suppose him God; if it were ex gratia, then it must be free; then it might be, or might not be ; therefore there was no incon- gruity in it that it should not be. And indeed it was most congruous that God having newly made such a creature, furnished with such powers, so capable of government by a law, of being moved by promises and threats, he should for some time hold him as a viator, in a state of trial unconfirmed, (as he did also the innocent angels,) that it might be seen how he would behave himself towards his Maker, and that he should be rewardable and punish- able accordingly, in a state that should be everlasting and unchangeable: the liberty therefore of the viators and the comprehensors, ""Gibieuf well distinguishes into inchoata or consummabilis, and perfecta or cnnsinnvwM ; the former such as Adam's was at his creation ; the latter such as is the state of angels and saints in glory; and as his would have been had he held out and persisted innocent through the intended time of trial. It was therefore no strange thing that man should be created defectible ; it was as little strange that a defectible creature should deficere. For the manner of that defec- tion, (whether error of the understanding preceded, or in- consideration only, and a neglect of its office,) with the great difficulties some imagine herein, I waive discourse about them ; judging that advice good and sober, for to consider more how sin may be gotten out of the world, than how it came in. Though 'tis most probable there was in the instant of temptation a mere suspension of the understanding's act, (not as previous to the sin, but as a part of it,) and thereupon a sudden precipitation of will, as Estius doth well determine. 6. Man being created mutable as to his holiness, must needs be so as to his happiness too. And that both upon a legal account, (for the law had determined that if he did sin he must die,) and also upon a natural ; for it was not possible that his soul being once depraved by sin, the powers of it vitiated, their order each to other, and to- wards their objects, broken and interrupted, there should remain a disposition and aptitude to converse with the highest good. The use follows, which shall be only in certain practical inferences that will issue from these truths, partly con- sidered singly and severally, partly together and in con- junction. From the First. 1. Did God create man upright as hath been shown 1 then how little reason had man to sin ! how little reason had he to desert Grod ! to be weary of his first estate ! Could God's making him, his making him upright, be a reason why he should sin against him 1 was hjs directing his heart, and the natural course of his affections towards himself, a reason M^hy he should forsake him 1 What was there in his state that should make it 1 Dion de Div. nom. m Gihicuf Jq libertate Dei ct creatunE. grievous to him "? Was his duty too much for him "? God made him upright, so that every part of it was connatural to him. Was his privilege too little "? He knew, and loved, and enjoyed the highest and infinite good. O think then how unreasonable and disingenuous a thing sin was! that a creature that was nothing but a few hours ago, now a reasonable being, capable of God, should yet sin i Urge your hearts with this, we are too apt to think ourselves unconcerned in Adam's sin ; we look upon ourselves too abstractly, we should remember we are members of a community, and it .should be grievous to us to think that our species hath dealt so unkindly and unworthily with God : and besides, do not v/e sin daily after the similitude of Adam's transgression 1 and is not sin as unreasonable and unjust a thing as ever % 2. Was our primitive state so good and happy, how justly may we reflect and look back towards our first state ! how fitly might we take up Job's words ! O that I were as in months past ; — as in the days of my youth; — when the Almighty was yet with me : — when I put on righte- ousness and it clothed me ; — when my glory was fresh in me, &c.n With what sadness may we call to mind the things that are past, and the beginnings of ancient time ! when there was no stain upon our natures, no cloud upon our minds, no pollution upon our hearts ; when with pure and undefiled souls we could embrace and rest, and re- joice in the eternal and incomprehensible good ! When we remember these things, do not our bowels turn 1 are not our souls poured out within us 1 From the Second. 1. Did man so voluntarily ruin him- self; how unlikely is he now to be his own saviour ! He that was a self-destroyer from the beginning, that ruined himself as soon as God had made him, is he likely now to save himself? Is it easier for him to recover his station than to have kept it 1 or hath he improved himself by sin- ning, and gained strength by his fall for a more difficult undertaking 1 Is he grown better natured towards himself and his God, than he was at first 1 2. How little reason hath he to blame God, though he finally perish ! What would he have had God to have done more to prevent it; he gave his law to direct him, his threatening to warn him ; his promise for his encourage- ment was evidently implied ; his nature was sufficiently disposed to improve and comport Avith all these : yet he sins ! Is God to be charged with this 1 Sins upon no ne- cessity, with no pretence ; but that he must be seeking out inventions, trying experiments, assaying to better his state, as plainly despising the law, suspecting the truth, envying the greatness, asserting and aspiring to the sovereignty and Godhead of his Maker. Had we (any of us) a mind to contend with God about this matter, how would we order our cause 1 how would we state our quarrel 1 If we complain that we should be condemned and ruined all in one man ; that is to complain that we are Adam's children. A child might as well complain that he is the son of a beggar or a traitor, and charge it as injustice upon the prince or law of the land that he is not born to a patri- mony ; this is a misery to him, but no man will say it is a wrong. And can it be said we are wronged by the com- mon Ruler of the world, that we do not inherit from our father the righteousness and felicity he had wilfully lost long before we were his children 1 If we think it hard we should be tied to terms we never consented to, might not an heir as well quarrel with the magistrate, that he suffers him to become liable to his father's debts, and to lie in prison if he have not to payl But besides, who can imagine but we should have con- sented, had all mankind been at that time existent in in- nocency together 1 i. e. let the case be stated thus : Sup- pose Adam, our common parent, to have had all his children together with him before the Lord, while the covenant of works was not as yet made, and while as yet God was not under any engagement to the children of men. Let it be supposed, that he did propound it to the whole race of mankind together, that he would capitulate with their common parent on their behalf, according to the terms of that first covenant ; if he stood, they should stand, if he fall, they must all fall with him. Let it be con- sidered, that if this had not been consented to, God mighi n Jobsxix. 2,4,5 14,20 MAN CREATED MUTABLE. 135 (^•without the least colour of exception, being as yet under no engagement to the contrary) have annihilated the whole species ; for wherein can it seem hard, that what was no- thing but the last moment, should the next moment be suf- fered to relapse into nothing again 1 Let it also be consi- dered, that Adam's own personal interest, and a mighty natural affection towards so vast a progeny, might well be thought certainly to engage him to the uttermost care and circumspection on his own and their behalf. It must also be remembered, that all being now in perfect innocency, no defect of reason, no frowardness or perverseness of will can be supposed in any, to hinder their right judgment, and choice of what might appear to be most for their own advantage, and the glory of their Maker. Can it now possibly be thought (the case being thus stated) that any man should rather choose presently to lose his being, and the pleasures and hopes of such a state, than to have consented to such terms "? It cannot be thought. For consider the utmost that might be objected ; and suppose one thiis to reason the matter with himself : " Whyl 'tis a mighty hazard for me to suspend my ever- lasting happiness or misery upon the uncertain determi- nations of another man's mutable will ; shall I trust my eternal concernments to such a peradventure, and put my life and hopes into the hands of a fellow-creature V It were obvious to him to answer himself, " Aye, but he is my father ; he bears a natural affection to me, his own concernment is included, he hath power over his own will, his obedience for us all will be no more difficult than each man's for himself; there is nothing required of him but what his nature inclines him to, and what his reason (if he use it) will guide him to comply with ; and though the hazard of an eternal misery be greatly tremendous, yet are not the hopes of an everlasting blessedness as greatly consolatory and encouraging 1 and besides, the hazard will be but for a time, which if we pass safely, we shall shortly receive a full and glorious confirmation and advancement." Certainly no reasonable man, all this considered, (though there had been no mention made of a means of recovery in case of falling, the consideration whereof is yet also to be taken in by us,) would have re- fused to consent. And then what reasonable man but will confess this to be mere cavil, that we did not personally consent ; for if it be certain we should have consented, and our own hearts tell us we should, doth the power of a Creator over his creatures signify so little that he might not take this for an actual consent 1 for is it not all one, whether you did consent, or certainly would have done it, if you had been treated with 1 Covenants betwixt superi- ors and inferiors, differ much from those betwixt equals; for they are laws as well as covenants, and therefore do suppose consent, (the terms being in se reasonable,) as that which not only our interest but duty would oblige us to. 'Tis not the same thing to covenant with the great God, and with a fellow-creature. God's prescience of the event, (besides that no man knows what it is, yet,) whatever it is, 'tis wholly immanent in himself, (as also his decrees,) o Rom. ui. 24 &c. 1 Cor. i. 30, 31. Eph. i. 6, 7. Tit. ii. 11—14. therefore could have no influence into the event, or be any cause of it; all depended, as hath been shown, on man's own will ; and therefore if God did foresee that man would fall, yet he knew also, that if he would he might stand. F'rom both joinUy. 1. Were we once so happy, and have we now undone ourselves 1 how acceptable should this render the means of our recoverv to us ! That 'tis a recovery we are to endeavour, (which implies the formei truth,) that suppo.ses us once happy, who would not be taken with such an overture for the leyainin:: Of a happi- ness, which he hath lost and fallen froml 'Tis a douBle misery to become from a happy estate miserable ; 'tis yet as a double happiness to become happy from such misery ; and proportionably valuable should all means appear to us that tend thereto. Yea, and 'tis a recovery after self-de- struction, (which asserts the former truth,) such ade.struc- tion as might reduce us to an utter despair of remedies, as rendering us incapable to help ourselves, or to expect help or pity from others. O how welcome should the tidings of deliverance now be to us! how joyful an entertainment should our hearts give them upon both these accounts ! How greatly doth Scripture " commend the love and grace of Christ, under the notion of redeeming ! a word that doth not signify deliverance from simple misery onh', but also connote a precedent better state, as they expound it who take the phrase, as Scripture uses it, to allude to the buying out of captives from their bondage. And how should it ravish the heart of any man to have mercy and help offered him by another hand, who hath perished by his own ! how taking should gospel-grace be upon this ac- count ! hoM' should this consideration engage souls to value and embrace it ! It is urged (we see) to that pur- pose, Hos. xiii. 9. O Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself, but in me is thy help ; and, v. 10. it follows, I will be thy King; where is anj^ other that will save thee "? &c. And ch. xiv. 1. O Israel, return unto the Lord, for thou hast fallen by thine iniquity. Now (friends) do but seriously consider this. If you believe the truths you have heard, how precious should Christ be to you ! how precious should the gospel, the ordinances, and ministry of it be ! Do you complain that formerly you were not treated with"? By all the.'^e God now treats with you. Now your own personal consent is called for ; not to any thing that hath the least of hazard in it, but what shall make you certainly happy, as miserable as you have made yourselves ; and there is nothing but your consent wanting, the price of your redemption is already paid ; 'tis but taking Christ for your Saviour and your Lord, and living a life of dependence and holiness for a few days, and you are as safe as if you were in glory. "Will you now stick at this 1 O do not destroy yourselves a second time, and make yourselves doubly guilty of your own ruin. 2. Was our state so gooi, but mutable 1 What cause have we to admire the grace of God, through Christ, that whom it recovers it confirms ! It was a blessed state, that by our own free will we fell from ; but how much better (even upon this account) is this, which by God's free grace we are invited and recalled to ! A CALM AND SOBER INQUIRY CONCERNING THB POSSIBILITY OP % A TRINITY IN THE GODHEAD, IN A LETTER TO A PERSON OF WORTH; OCCASIONED BY THE LATELY PUBLISHED CONSIDERATIONS ON THE EXPLICATIONS ON THE DOCTRINE OP THE TRINITY, BY DR. WALLIS, DR. SHERLOCK, DR. S — TH, DR. CUDWORTH, &C. TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN LETTERS, FORMERLY WRITTEN TO THE REVEREND DR. WALLIS, ON THE SAME SUBJECT, Sir, I INTEND not this discourse shall be concerned in what this author hath said of the several explications given oy the persons named on his title-page. The only thing it is designed for, is the discoursing with him that single point which he refers to, in his twenty -ninth and thirtieth pages, and which, in this controversy, is on all hands con- fessed to be the cardinal one, viz. Whether a trinity in the Godhead be possible or no 1 I put not the question about three persons ; both because I will not, in so short a discourse as I intend to make this, be engaged in discussing the unagreed notion of a person ; and because the Scripture lays not that necessity upon me, though I do not think the use of that term, in this affair, either blameable or indefensible. But I shall inquire whe- iher the Father, the Son, or Word, and the Holy Ghost, cannot possibly admit of sufficient distinction from one another to answer the parts and purposes severally assigned them by the Scripture, in the Christian economy, and yet be each of them God, consistently with this most inviola- ble and indubitable truth, that there can be but one God. This author concludes it to be impossible in the men- tioned pages of his discourse, and thereupon seems to judge it necessary that two of them be excluded the God- head, as manv others, some going the Arian, some the Photinian, more lately called the Socinian way, have done before him. He acknowledges, page 30, col. 1. there may be "some secret revealed by God, because it was above human capacity to discover it; and sometimes also to comprehend how it can be;" but adds, " there is a vast difference between my not being able to conceive how a thing should be, and a clear apprehension and sight that it cannot be." What he says thus far is unexceptionable, and I heartily concur with him in it. But for what he subjoins, (wherein he might have spoken his mind of the matter in controversy with as much advantage to his cause, without reflecting upon his adversaries, as if they con- sidered these things either with no intention, or with no sincerity, not allowing them even the never so little of the one or the other,) that " three distinct Almighty and All- knowing persons, should be but one Almighty, or but one All-knowing, or but one God, a man, who considers with never so little intention and sincerity, clearly sees that it cannot be. In short, that it is not a mystery, but, as Dr. South speaks, an absurdity and a contradiction." This is that I would consider with him, if he will affix these words of his, " a man who considers, &c. clearly sees it cennot be, and it is an absurdity and a contradiction," to the question a^ I hare set it down above. In the mean- time he cannot be ignorant that, as he hath represented the matter, he hath here either not truly, or at least not fairly, given the sense of any of them whom he pretended to oppose. For when by those words, " But that three Divine per- sons, or that three distinct Almighty and All-knowing per- sons, should be but one Almighty, but one All-knowing, ar but one God," he would slily insinuate to his unwary and less attentive reader, that the same men held three Almighties, and but one ; he well knows, and elsewhere confesses, (though he might suppose that some readers would not be at leisure to compare one place of his writings with another, but hastily run awaj' with the ap- prehension, that such as were not of his mind spake no- tning but nonsense and contradictions,) that not only his later opposers since P. Lumbard, as he speaks, but divers much more ancient, as Athanasius, and the rest of the Nicene fathers, &c. denied three Almighties, though they affirmed each of the persons to be Almighty, understand- ing omnipotency, as they do omnisciency, to be an attribute not of the person, as such, but of the essence, as such, which they affirm to be but one, i. e. that they are each of them Almighty, by communication in one and the same almighty essence. And if their sentiment be so very ab- surd, he needed the less to fear representing it as it is. And the other who seems to grant three Almighties, doth never say there is but one Almighty ; though such say too there is but one God, placing the unity of the God- head in somewhat else, as he hath himself taken notice ; which is remote from express self-contradiction also. But I shall concern myself no further about the one or the other of these ways of explaining the doctrine of the three persons. Only shall inquire concerning the possibility of such a trinity in the Godhead as was above expressed, re- quiting the uncharitableness of this author, in imputing carelessness or insincerity to all that think it possible, with so much charity, as to believe he would not (against the plain tenor of Scripture) have rejected the doctrine of the trinity, as he professes to do that of the incarnation, if he had not thought it every way impossible. And here I premise, 1. That the present undertaking is not to show that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are three, and but one, in the same respect; which I would adventure, in this au- thor's words, to say, no man that considers with never so little intention and sincerity would offer at. But when they are supposed to be but one, in respect of Deity, they are thought to be three in some other respect. 2. That what I now design is only to represent this A CALM DISCOURSE OF THE TRINITY &c. 137 matter as possible to be some way, and in the way here proposed for ought we know, not as definitely certain to be this way or that. The former is enough to our present purpose, i. e. if any way it can be conceived, without ab- surdity or contradiction, that these may be three with sufiicient distinction to found the distinct attributes which the Scriptures do severally give them, so as some things may be affirmed of some one, and not be afSrmed of the other of them, and yet their unity in Godhead be con- served; our point is gained, and the clamour of this and every other opposer ought to cease, for our asserting what every one, that considers, clearly sees cannot be. Now, so much being forelaid, that we may proceed with clearness and satisfaction of mind — If we would under- stand whether it be possible that these three may be suffi- ciently distinguished for the mentioned purpose, and yet be one in Godhead, or in divine being; we are to recollect ourselves, and consider what we are wont, and find our- selves indispensably obliged, to conceive of that ever bless- ed Being, and what is with less certainty or evidence said or thought of it. Therefore, I. We cannot but acknowledge, that whereas we do with greatest certainty and clearness conceive of it as an intel- lectual Being, comprehensive, with that, of infinite and universal perfection ; so we do, most expressly, though this be implied in universal perfection, conclude it a Being most necessarily existent : which God hath himself been pleased to signify to us by the appropriated name, I am, or I am what I am. Hereby is this most excellent of beings infinitely dis- tinguished from all creatures, or from the whole creation. All created being is merely contingent, i. e. (according to the true notion of contingency) dependent upon will and pleasure. So he hath himself taught us to distinguish ; and with such distinction to conceive of the creation. Rev. iv. II. Thou hast made all things, and for {or by, 6ia) thy pleasure (or will, QiMna an) they are, or were created. Whatsoever being is necessarily existent, the excellency of its nature being such, as that it was necessary to it to exist, or impossible not to exist, is God, or is divine being. Notwithstanding what some have imagined of necessary matter, we might adventure to affirm this uni- versally of all necessary being, that it is divine, taking it to be plainly demonstrable, and to have been demonstrated beyond all contradiction, by the learned Dr. Cudworth, and many others long before him. And doubt not to evince, (though that is not the present business,) that sup- posing the imagination of necessary matter were true, this sensible world could never possibly have been made of it, by any power whatsoever; the only pretence for which it is imagined. But if any have a mind to make this a dis- pute, to avoid being unseasonably involved in it at this time, it will serve my present purpose to assert onl)% what- soever intellectual being is necessarily existent is divine. , And on the other hand, whatsoever being is contingent, i. e. such as that it depended on a mere intervening act of will (viz. even the sovereign and supreme will) whether it should be or not be, is created, or is creature. II. Whatsoever simplicity the ever blessed God hath by any express revelation claimed to himself, or can by evident and irrefragable reason be demonstrated to belong to him, as a perfection, we ought humbly, and with all possible reverence and adoration, to ascribe to him. But such simplicity as he hath not claimed, as is arbitrarily ascribed to him by over-bold and adventurous intruders into the deep and most profound arcana of the Divine nature, such as can never be proved to belong to him, or to be any real perfection, such as would prove an imper- fection, and a blemish, would render the Divine nature less intelligible, more impossible to be so far conceived as is requisite, as would discompose and disturb our minds, confound our conceptions, make our apprehensions of his other known perfections less distinct or inconsistent, ren- der him less adorable, or less an object of religion, or such as is manifestly unreconcileable with his plain affirmations concerning himself, we ought not to impose it upon our- selves, or be so far imposed upon, as to ascribe to him such simplicity. It would be an over-officious and too meanly servile religiousness, to be awed by the sophistiy of presumptuous scholastic wits, into a subscription to 'their confident de- termmations concerning the being of God, that such and such thmgs are necessary or impossible thereto, beyond what the plain undisguised reason of things, oi his own express word, do evince : to imagine a sacredne.ssin their rash conclusions, so as to be afraid of searching into them or of examining whether they have any firm and solid ground or bottom ; to allow the schools the making of our Bible, or the foiming of our creed, who license (and even sport) themselves to philosophize upon the nature of God, with as petulant and irreverent a libert3', as they would upon a worm, or any the meanest insect, while yet tbey can pronounce little with certainty even concerning that- hath nothing in it either of the Chri.stian or the man. It will become as well as concern us, to disencumber our minds, and release them from the entanglements of their unproved dictates; whatsoever authority they may have acquired, only by having been long, and commonly, takea for granted. The more reverence we have of God, the less we are to have for such men, as have themselves ex- pressed little. III. Such as have thought themselves obliged by the plain word of God to acknowledge a trinity in the God- head, viz. of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, 'but withal to diminish the distinction of (he one from the other, so as even to make it next to nothing, by reason of the straits into which unexamined maxims have cast their minds, concerning the Divine simplicity; have yet not thought that to be absolute or omnimodo^is. For the allowing ol three sonewhats in the Divine nature (and what less could have been said ?) cannot consist with absolute simplicity in all respects, ina.sinuch as they cannot be three without difl^ering, in some respect, from one anothei . Since therefore there is a necessity apprehended of ac- knowledging three such somevhats in the Godhertd, both because the word of God (who best understands his own nature) doth speak of three in it so plainly, that, withom notorious violence, it cannot be understood' otherwise, and because it affirms some things of one or other of t^em, which it affirms not of the rest; it will therefore be neces- sary to admit a true distinction between them, otherwi.se they cannot be three ; and safe to say there is so much, as is requisite to found the distinct affirmations, which we find in God's word, concerning this or that, apart from the other, otherwise we shall, in effect, deny what God af- firms; and modest to confess that how great the distinction is, with precise and particular limitation, we do not know nor dare be curious to determine or inquire : only that as it cannot be less, than is sufficient to sustain distinct pre- dicates or attributions; so it cannot be so great, as to in- trench upon the unity of the Godhead. Which limits, on the one hand, and the other, God hath himself plainly set t.s. IV. Therefore since we may ofiend verv highl'v bv an arrogant pretence to the knowledge we have not, biit .shall not offend by confessing the ignorance which we cannot (and therefore need not) remedy, we should abstain from confident conclusions in the dark, and at random, espe- cially concerning the nature of God ; and for instance, from saying. We clearly see a sufficient distinction of Father, Son, and Spirit, in the Godhead cannot be, or is impossible. It expresses too little revei-«nce of God, as if his being had any, or so narrow, limits as tobe presently seen through; an over-magnifying opinion of ourselves, as if our eye could penetrate that vast and sacred darkne.ss, or the glorious light, (equally impervious to us,) wherein God dwells; too great rudeness to the rest of men, more than implicitly representing all mankind besides as stark blind, who can discern nothing of what we pretend clearly to see. And it is manifest this cannot be said to be impossible, upon any other pretence, but that it consists not with the vnity of the Godhead, in opposition to the multiplication thereof, or with that simplicity which stands in opposition tothe concurrence in all perfections therein, with distinction greater than hath been commonly thought to belong to divine nature. For the former, we are at a certainty : but for the latter, how do we know what the original, natural state of the Divine Being is, in this respect ? or what simplicity belongs to it 1 or what it may contain or com- prehend in it, consistently with the unity thereof! or so, 138 A CALM DISCOURSE OF but that it may still be but one Divine Being 1 What dis- tinction and unity (conserved together) we can have, otherwise, an idea of without any apprehended inconsist- ency, absurdity, or contradiction, we shall rashly pro- nounce to be impossible (or somewhat imperfectly resem- bled thereby) in the Divine Being, unless we understood it better than we do. Some prints and characters of that most perfect Being may be apprehended in the creatures, especially that are intelligent ; such being expressly said to have been made in the image of God. And if here we find oneness, with dislincLion, meeting together in the same created intelligent being, this may assist our understand- ings in conceiving what is possible to be, (in much higher perfection,) though not to the concluding what certainly is, in the v.ncrealed. V. Waving the many artificial unions of distinct things, that united, and continuing distinct, make one thing under one name, 1 shall only consider what is natural, and give instance in what is nearest us, owr very selves ; though the truth is, we know sro little of our own nature, that it is a strange assuming when we confidently determine what is impossible to be in the Divine nature, besides what he hath told us, or made our own faculties plainly tell us, is so; and what he hath made any man's faculties to tell him, he halh made all men's that can use them. But so much we manifestly find in ourselves, that we have three natures in us very sufficiently distinguishable, and that are intimately united, the vegetalive, sensitive, and the intellective. So that notwithstanding their manifest distinction, no one scruples, when they are united, to call the whole the huvian nature. Or if any make a difficulty, or would raise a dispute about the distinction of these three natures, I for the present content myself with what is more obvious, not doubting to reach any mark by de- grees, viz. that we are made up of a mind, and a body, somewhat that can think, and somewhat that cannot ; sufficiently distinct, yet so united, that not only every one, without hesitation, calls that thing made up of them, one man ; but also every one that considers deeply, will be transported with wonder by what more than magical knot or tie, two things, so little akin, should be so held together, that the one that hath the power of will and choice cannot sever itself, and return into the same union with the other, at pleasure. But, VI. Since we find this is a thing actually done, the making up of two things of so different natures into one thing, that puts the maUer out of doubt that this was a thing possible to be done, 'twas what God could do, for he hath done it. And if that were possible to him, to unite two tilings of so very diflerent natures into one thing ; let any colourable reason be assigned me, why it should not be as possible to him, to unite two things of a like nature ; i. e. if it were possible to him, to unite a spirit and a body, why is it less possible to him to have united two spirits? And then I further inquire, if it were possible to him to unite two, would it not be as possible to unite three ? Let reason here be put upon its utmost stretch, and tell me what in all this is less possible than what we see is ac- tually done ! Will any man say two or three spirits united, being of the same nature, will mingle, be confounded, run into one another, and lose their distinction] I ask, suppos- ing them to pre-exist apart, antecedently to their union, are they not now distinguished by their own individual es- sences ; let ihem be as much united as our souls and bodies are, why should they not as much remain distinct by their singular essences 1 There is no more hazard of their losing their distinction, by the similitude of their natures, than of our soul and body transmuting one another by their dissimilitude. I know not but the dictates of so vogued an author with many in this age, as Spinosa, may signify somewhat with some into whose hands this may fall ; who, with design bad enough, says, that from whence one might collect the remaining distinction of two things of the same nature in such a supposed union, were the more easily conceivable of the two, i. e. than of two things of different natures. For in his Posthumous Ethics, de Deo, he lays this down in explication of his second definition, Cogitatio alia cogi- tatione terminatur. At corpus nan terminatur cogitatione, nee cogitatio corpore. Some may regard him in this, and it would do our business. For my part, I care not to be so much beholden to him ; for it would, at the long run, overdo it; and I know his meaning. But I see not but two congenerous natures are equally capable of being united, retaining their distinction, as two of a different kind; and that sufficiently serves the present purpose. However, let any man tell me, why it should be im- possible to God so to unite three spirits, as by his own power to fix their limits also, and by a perpetual law inwrought in their distinct beings, to keep them distinct, so that they shall remain everlastingly united, but not iden- tified ; and by virtue of that union, be some one thing, which must, yet, want a name, as much, and as truly, as our soul and body united do constitute one man. Nor is it now the question, whether such a union would be con- venient or inconvenient, apt or inapt ; but all the question is, whether it be possible or impossible ; which is as much as we are concerned in at this time. But you will say, Suppose it be possible, to what purpose is all this ? how remote is it from the supposed trinity in the Godhead ! You will see to what purpose it is by and by. I there- fore add, VII. That if such a union of three things, whether of like or of different natures, so as that they shall be truly one thing, and yet remain distinct, though united, can be effected, as one may with certainty pronounce, there is no- thing more impossible or unconceivable in it, than we find is actually done, then it is not intrinsically impossible, or objectively ; it is not impossible in itself. No power can effect what is simply and in itself impossible. There is therefore no contradiction, no repugnancy, or inconsist- ency, as to the thing, nor consequently any shadow of ab- surdity in the conception hereof. Whereupon, VIII. If such a imion with such distinction be not impossible in itself, so that by a competent power it is suf- ficiently possiblp to be effected, or made ; we are to con- sider whether it will appear more impossible, or whether I shall have a conception in my own mind any thing more incongruous, if I conceive such a union, with such dis- tinction, unmade, or that is original and eternal in an un- raarle or uncreated being. For we are first to consider the thing in itself, abstractly from made or unmade, created or uncreated, being. And if it pass clear of contradiction or absurdity, in its abstract notion, we are so far safe, and are not liable to be charged as having the conception in our minds of an impossible, absurd, or self-repugnant thing. So that clamour and cry of the adversary must cease, or be itself absurd, and without pretence. This now supposed, union with such distinction, must if it be judged impossible, as it is in our thoughts introduced into unmade being, can no longer be judged impo.ssible as it is a union of distinct things, but only as it is unmade, or is supposed to have place in the unmade eternal Being. IX. This is that then we have further to consider, whe- ther, supposing it possible that three spiritual beings might as well be made or created in a state of so near union with continuing distinction, as to admit of becoming one spiri- tual being, to be called by some fit name, which might easily be found out, if the thing were produced, as that a spiritual being and a corporeal being may be made and created in a state of so near union with continuing distinc- tion, as to become one spiritual-corporeal being, called by the name of man ; I say, whether, supposing the former of these to be as possible to be done, or created, as the latter, which we see done already, we may not as well suppose somewhat like it, but infinitely more perfect, to be original and eternal in the uncreated Being] If the first be pos- sible, the next actual, what pretence is there to think the last impossible] X. I might add, as that -which may be expected to be significant with such as do seriously believe the doctrines both of the incarnation and the trinity, though I know it will signify nothing with them who with equal contempt reject both, that the union of the two natures, the human, made up of a human body and a human soul, which are two exceedingly different natures, with the divine, which is a third, and infinitely more different from both the other in one person, viz. of the Son of God, cannot certainly appear to any considering person more conceivable or pos- sible, than that which we now suppose, but assert not, of THE TRINITY IN THE GODHEAD. J39 three distinct essences united in the 07ie Godhead, upon any account, but this only, that this is supposed to be an un- made, eternal union, the other made and temporal; which renders not the one less conceivable than the other, as it is union, but only as in the several terms ol'this union it is supposed eternally to have place in the being of God ; whereas that other union, in respect of one of its terms, is acknowledged de novo to have place there. In short, here is a spiritual created being, a human soul, setting aside for the present the consideration of the human body, which united therewith made up the man, Christ, confessed to be in hypostatical union with the uncreated spiritual being of God-, not as that being is in the person of the Father, nor as in the person of the Holy Ghost, for then they should have become man too; but as it was in the person of the Son only. Why shall it be thought less possible t4iat three rmcreated spiritual beings maybe in so near a union with each other as to be one God, as that a created spirit, and body too, should be in so near a union with one of the persons in the Godhead only, as therewith to be one person? Will it not hereby be much more easily apprehensible how one of the persons (as the common way of speaking is) should be incarnate, and not the other two 1 Will not the notion of person itself be much more unex- ceptionable, when it shall be supposed to have its own in- dividual natm-e 1 And why is a natural, eternal union of uncreated natures, with continual distinction, or with- out confusion, sufficient unto the imity of the Godhead, less supposable, than a temporal contracted union with created natures, without confusion too, that shall be suffi- cient to the unity of a person 1 Will it be any thing more contrary to such simplicity of the Divine nature as is ne- cessarily to be ascribed thereto 1 or will it be Iritheism, and inconsistent with the acknowledged inviolable unity of the Godhead 1 XI. That we may proceed to speak to both, let these things be considered with seriousness and sobriety of mind, as to ourselves ; with all possible reverence towards the blessed God ; and with just candour and equanimity to- wai'ds other men. And first, we must leave it to any one's future representation (not being hitherto able to discern any thing) what there is in all this that is here supposed any way repugnant to such simplicity, as Grod any where claims to his own being, or that plain reason will constrain us to ascribe to him, or that is really in itself any perfec- tion. We are sure God hath not by his word taught us to ascribe to him universal absolute simplicit}' ; or .sug- gested to us any such notices as directly and evidently in- fer it to belong to him; nor hath seemed at all intent upon cautioning of us lest we should not ascribe it. The v-ord we find not among his attributes mentioned in the Holy Scriptures. The thing, so far as it signifies any general perfection, we are sure belongs to him; but the Scriptures are not written with visible design to obviate any danger of our misconceiving his nature, by not apprehending it to be in every respect most absolutely simple. It doth teach us to conceive of him as most powerful, most wise, most gracious ; and doth not teach us to conceive all these in the abstract, viz. power, wisdom, and goodness, to be the same thing. Yet we easily apprehend, by refleciing upon ourselves, that, without multiplying the subject, these may all reside together in the same man. But our dilhculty is greater to conceive what is commonly taught, that these, without real distinction, or with formal only, as contradis- tinguished to the dilTerence of thing from thing, are in the abstract affirmable of God, that he is power, wisdom, good- ness : that to his being belongs so ab.solute simplicity, that we must not look upon these as things really distinguishable, there, from one another, but as diflFerent conceptions of the .same thing. We must conceive of things as we can, not 35 we cannot : and are only concerned to take heed of un- revealed, and undemonstrable, and peremptory' concep- tions concerning that glorious, most incomprehensible, and ever blessed Being; to beware of too curious prying into the nature of God, when it was so penal to look unduly into, or even to touch, that only-hallowed symbol of his presence, his ark, beyond what he hath revealed expressly, or we can most clearly, by generally received light, appre- hend.' When we know there is a knowledge of him so ••eserved from us, whereof our minds are so little receptive, that it seemed all one, whether he told us he did dwell in thick darkness, or in inaccessible lighi. 'Twill be a re- proach to us, if we shall need to be taught reverence o£ him by pagans; or that such a document should need to be given us for our admonition, as that very ancient in- scription in one of their temples imported, " lam whatso- ever was, is, or shall be, and who is he that shall draw aside my veil 1" XII. If we should .suppose three spiritual necessary be- ings, the one whereof were mere power (or furious might) destitute of either wisdom or goodness ; another mere wis- dom (or craft rather) destitute of euher goodness or power; a third mere goodness (or fond and fruitless kindness) destitute of either power or wisdom; existing separately and apart from each other ; this triple conception would overthrow it.self, and must certainly allow little ease to any considering mind. Nor could any of these be God. Biit if we conceive essential power, wi.- to have come down from heaven, was, even while he was on earth, at that time, said to be in heaven : — that we are told by himself," he and his Father are one thing : — that he is not only saido to know the heart, but to know all things : — that even he who p according to the flesh came of the Israelites, is yet expressly said to be over all, God blessed for ever: — that when he was"! in the form of God, he humbled himself to the taking on him the form of a servant, and to be found in fashion as a man : — that 'tis said,' all things were created by him, that are in heaven, and on earth, visible and invisible, thrones, dominions, principalities, powers, — and that all things were created by him, and for him ; than which nothing could have been said more peculiar or appropriate to Deity : — that even of the Son of God it is said,^ he is the true God and eternal life : — that we are so plainly told, heist Alpha and Omega, the first and the last," he that was, and is, and is to come,* the Lord Almighty, the beginning of the creation of God: the searcher of hearts: — that the Spirit of God is said y to search all things, even the deep things of God : — that lying to him is said ^ to be lying to God : — that the great Chris- tian solemnity, baptism, is directed to be in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost: — that it is so distinctly said,"^ there are three that bear record in heaven, the Fa- ther, the Word, and the Spirit, and that these three are one thing. I cannot imagine what should oblige us so studiously to wiredraw all this to quite other meanings. XXIV. And for the leaving out of the last mentioned q PMl ii. X Cliap. iii. r Col. i. 8 1 John v. t Rev. i. u Chap. ii. y I Cor. ii. z AcU v. a l John v. THE TRINITY IN THE GODHEAD. 143 text in some copies, what hath been said (not to mention divers others) hjMhe famously learned Dr. Hammond upon that place, is so reasonable, so inod«i ate, so charitable to the opposite party, and so apt to satisfy impartial and un- prejudiced minds, that one would scarce think, after the reading of it, any real doubt can remain concerning the auiheniicness of that 7th verse in 1 John v. Wherefore now taking all these texts together; with many more that might have been mentioned, 1 must indeed profess to wonder, that with men of so good sense, as our Socinian adversaries are accounted, this consideration should not have more place and weight, That it being so obvious to any reader of ihe Scriptures to apprehend from so numerous texts, that Deity must belong to the Son of God, and that there wants not sufficient inducement to conceive so of the Holy Ghost also ; there should be no more caution given in the Scriptures themselves to prevent mistake (if there were any) in apprehending the matter ac- cordingly: and to obviate the unspeakable consequent danger of erring in a case of so vast importance. Ho\v unagreeable it is to all our notions of God, and to his usual procedure in cases of less consequence ! How little doth it consist with his being so wise and so compassion- ate a lover of the souls of men, to let them be so fatally exposed unto so inevitable and so destructive a delusion ! that the whole Christian church should through so many centuries of years, be even trained into so horrid and con- tinued idolatry by himself who so severely forbids it! I cannot allow myself to think men of that. persuasion in- sincere in their professing to believe the divine authority of the Holy Scriptures, when the leader and head of their party wrote a book, that is not without nerves, in defence of it. But I confess I cannot devise, with what design they can think those Scriptures were written I or why thej' should count it a thing worthy of infinite wisdom to vouch- safe such a revelation to men, allowing them to treat and use it as they do! And that till some great Socinian wits should arise fifteen hundred years after, to rectifj' their notions in these things, men should generally be in so great hazard of being deceived into damnation by those very Scriptures, v/hich were professedly writ to make them wise to salvation ! XXV. Nor is it of so weighty importance in this contro- versy, to cast the balance the other way, that a noted critic (upon what introducement needs not be determined) changed his judgment, or that his posthumous interpreta- tions of some texts (if they were his interpretations) carry an appearance of his having changed it ; because he thought such texts might possibl)^ admit to be interpreted otherwise, than they usually were, by such as alleged them for the trinity, or the (disputed) Deity of the Son or Spirit, or that the cause must be lost, upon his deserting it. or that he was still to be reckoned of the opposite party, (as this author calls it,) and that such texts as we most relied upon, were therefore giv^en up by some of our own. And it is really a great assuming, when a man shall ad- venture to pronounce so peremptorily, against the so common judgment of the Christian church, without an}^ colour of proof, that our copies are false copies, our trans- lations, our explications false, and the generality of the wisest, the most inquisitive, most pious, and most judicious assertors of the Christian cause, for so many continued ages, fools, or cheats, for o'WTiing and avowing them ; for no other imaginable reason, but only because they make against him ! How will he prove any copies we rely upon to be false ? Is it because he is pleased to suspect them 1 And is an interpretation false, because the words can possibly be tortured unto some other sense 1 Let him name me the text, wherein any doctrine is supposed to be delivered that is of merely supernatural revelation, of which it is not pos- sible to devise some other meaning, nor more remote, alien, or unimaginable, than theirs, of most of the disputed texts. Nor indeed do we need to expect that natural sentiment in itself, that there is but one God, (which this author takes such pains to prove, as if he thought, or would make other men think, we denied it.) For though it is so generally ac- knowledged, doth he not know it is not so generally un- derstood in the same sense 1 Against whom doth he write 1 Doth he not know they understand this oneness in one sense, he in another 1 they in such a sense as admits a triaily, he in a sense that excludes if? But (lor such things as did need a superadded verbal revelation) how easy is it to an inventive, pervicacious wit, to wrest words this way, or that. XXVI. The Scriptures were writ for the instruction of sober learners; not for the pastime of contentious wits, that affect only to play tricks upon them. At their rate of interpreting, among whom he ranks himself, 'tis impossible any doctrine can with certainly be founded upon them. Takeihefirstchapterof St. John's Gospel, for instance, and what doctrine can be asserted in plainer words, than the Deity of Christ, in the three first verses of that chapter ? Set any man of an ordinary, unprepossessed undt^rsianding, to read them, and when he finds that by the Word is meant Jesus Christ, (which themselves admit,) see if he will not judge it plainly taught, that Jesus Christ is God, in the most eminent, known sense ; especially when he shall take notice of so many other texts, that, according to their most obvious appearance, carry the same sense. But it is first, through mere shortness of discourse, taken for granted, and rashly concluded on, that it is absolutely impossible, if the Father be God, the Son can be God too, (or the Holy Ghost,) upon a presum.ption, that we can know ever)- thing that belongs to the Divine nature ; and what is possible to be in it, and what not ; and next, there is hereupon not only a license imagined, but an obligation, and necessity, to shake heaven and earth, or tear that divine word that is more stable into a thousand pieces, or expound it tc nothing, to make it comply with that forelaid presumptu- ous determination. Whereas if we could but bend our minds so far to comply with the plain duel u re of that re- velation God hath made unto us of himself; as to appre- hend that in the most only Godhead there may be di.-^iinc- tions, which we particularly understand not, sufficient to found the doctrine of a trinity therein, and very consistent with the unity of it; we should save the Divine word, and our own minds, from unjust torture, both at once. And our task, herein, will be the easier, that we are neither con- cerned nor allowed to determine, that things are precisely so, or so; but only to suppose it possible ihat so they may be, for ought that we know. Which will I am certain not be so hard nor so bold an undertaking, as his, who shall take upon him to prove, that any thing here supposed is impossible. Indeed if any one would run the discourse into the abyss of infinity, he may soon create such difficulties to himself, as it ought not "to be thousrht strange, if they be greater than any human understanding can expedite. But not greater than any man will he entangled in, that shall set himself to consider infinity upon other accounts : which yet he will find it imposed upon him unavoidably to ad- mit, whether he will or no: not greater than this author will be equally concerned in, upon his doinsr that right to truth, in opposition to the former leaders of his own party, as to acknowledge the omnipresence of the Divine essence, (p. 32.) which he will find, let him try it when he will : nor yet so great, nor accompanied with so gross, so palpable and horrid absurdities, as he will soon be encountered with, should he retract his grant, or entertain the monstrous- ly maimed, and most deformed, impious conceit of a finite, or limited Deity. XXVII. Yet" also in this present case, the impossibility to our narrow minds of comprehending infinity, is most rationallv improveable to our very just advaniaee. It ought to be upbraided to none as a pretext, or a coA'er to sloth, or dulness, 'Tis no reproach to us that we are creatures, and have not infinite capacities. And it ought to quiet our minds, that they may so certainly know they have limits; within which, we are to content ourselves with such notions, about indemonstrable and unrevealcd things, as they can, wiih great ease to themselves, find room for, lean reflect upon nothing in what is here proposed, but what is intelligible without much toil, or much metaphysics. As matters, of so common concernment, ought, to our uttermost, to be represented in such a way that they may be so; we need not be concerned in scholastic di.-=quisi- tions about union ; or by what peculiar name to call that which is here supposed! It's enough for us to know there niav be a real, natural, vital, and very intimate union, of 144 A CALM DISCOURSE OF things that shall, notwithstanding it, continue distinct, and that shall, by it, be truly one. Nor do we need to be anx- iously curioua in stating ihe notions oi person ox personality, of suppositum and siuppositality, though I tliink not the term person disallowable in the present case. Nor will I say what that noted man (so noted that I need not name him, and who was as much acquainted with metaphysics as most in his age) published to the world above twenty years ago, that he counted the notion of the schools about suppositum a foolery. For I do well know, the thing itself, which our Christian metaphysicians intended, to be of no small importance in our religion, and especially to the doctrine of redemption, and of our Redeemer. XXVIII. But I reckon they that go the more metaphy- sical way, and content themselves with the modal distinc- tion of three persons in the Godhead, say nothing herein that can be proved absurd or contradictious. As to what is commonly urged, that if there be three persons in the Deity, each pers'":. must have ilsAisXmcl individual essence, as well as its distinct personality, I would deny the conse- quence, and say, that though this be true in created per- sons (taking person in the strict metaphysical sense) it is not necessary to be so in uncreated : that the reason is not the same between finite things and infinite ; and would put them to prove, if they can, that the same infinite essence cannot be whole and undivided in three several persons ; knowing there can be nothing more difiicult urged in the case, than may against the Divine omnipresence ; which irrefragable reasons, as well as the plainest testimony of Scripture, will oblige us to acknowledge. But I think, though this hypothesis, abstractedly con- sidered, and by itself, is not indefensible, it doth not alto- gether so well square with the Christian economy, nor so easily allow that distinction to the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which seems requisite to found the distinct attribu- tions that ate severally given them in the Holy Scriptures. XXIX. To conclude, I only wish these things might be considered, and discoursed with less confidence, and pe- remptory determination ; with a greater awe of what is divine and sacred; and that we may more confine our- selves to the plain words of Scripture in this matter, and be content therewith. I generally blame it in the Socini- ans, (who appear otherwise rational and considering men,) that they seem to have formed 'heir belief of things, not ■possible to be known but by the Scriptures, without them ; and then think they are by all imaginable arts, and they care not what violence, (as Socinus himself hath in effect confessed,) to mould and "orm them according to their preconceived sense. Common modesty, and civility, one would have thought, should have made Schlictingius ab- stain from prefixing, and continuing that as a running title to a long chapter : Articulus Eva.ngelicorum de Trinitate ium sensu communi piignat ; engrossing common sense to himself and his party, and reproaching the generality of Christians, as not understanding common sense. They should take upon them less, and not vaunt, as if they were the men, and wisdom must die with them. For this author, I congratulate his nearer approach to us, from those who were formerly^ leaders of his party, in the doctrines of God's omnipresence, and the perceptiveness and activity of separate souls. He writes with sprightliness ^/nd vigour, and, I doubt not, believes really, what he writes with so little seeming doubt. And because his spirit appears to be of a more generous, exalted pitch, t^an to comport with any thing against his judgment, for secu- Ar interest and advantage, I reckon it the greater pity it should want the addition of what would be very orna- mental to it, and which he wishes to two of the persons, to whom he makes himself an antagonist, more of the ten- derness and catholic charity of genuine Christianity, (p. 19. col. 2.) to accompany those his abilities and learnicg, which would not thereby be the lesser (as he speaks) nor the less conspicuous. I believe few would have thougi^: «'Jt^ to see the less clearly, if he had been content to see for himself, not for mankind. And if he had not talked at that rate, as if he carried the eyes of all the world in his pocket, they would have been less apt to think he carried his own there. Nor had his performance, in this writing of his, lost any thing of real value, if in a discourse upon so grave a subject, some lepidities had been left out, as that ol Duhi^inea del Toboso, tf'C. And to allude to what he says of Dr. Cudworth, his displeasure will not hurt so rough an author as Arnobius, so many ages after he is dead, if he should happen to ofl^end him, by having once said, Dissoluti — est pectoris in rebus seriis quarere voluptatcm — ? I'Tr/ipicus was the gcnitvm or spiratnm as to the two latter: a notion that is either too fine, or too little solid, for some minds to grasp, or take any hold of: others that the Divine nature might itself be some way said to be communicated to them. But I pa.'ss to the II. Inquiry, Whether some further distinction may not be admitted as possible 1 The only thing that straitens us here, is the most unquestionable unity or vnicity (as we may call it) of the Godhead. Which, if it cannot be otherwise defended, I must yet for my part, notwith.stand- ing these hardships (and I know no man with wh(>m I could do it with more inclination) fall in with you. But I must crave it of you, so far to tall in with you know not who, as to apply your clearer mind, as I do my more cloudy one, to consider whether it can or no. You will here say, Further than what 1 and what would I have further '1 To the former of these, I only say, further than the as- serting, in very deed, but one hypostasis, in the Godhead, distinguished no otherwise into three, than b}' certain re- lative capacities, like those which may among men be sus- tained by one and the same man; and which distinction, as you after add, is analogous to what, in created beings, is called distinctio modalis. To the latter, I desire you to observe what I generally propose, not that we may positively assert any further determinate distinction as certain and known ; hut only whether we may not admit some further distinction to be possible, in consistency with the unity of the Godhead. I do equally detest and dread to speak with rash and pe- remptory confidence about things both so mysterious and so sacred. But may we not modestly say, thai if to that economy which God hath represented himself in his word, to bear, and keep afoot, towards his creatures, any further distinction than hath been assigned is necessary, it is also possible, and may be, for ought we know: if indeed we know nothing to the contiary. What is iinpossiblc we are sure cannot be 7iccessary. But God himself best and only 148 A CALM DISCOURSE OF K-nows his own nature, and wliat his own meaning is in the representation he hath made to us. If we sincerely aim to understand his meaning, that we may bear ourselves towards him accordingly, he wilt with merciful indul- gence consider our short, or mis-apprehensions. But we need not say there is not this or that distinction, if really we do not know there is not. While we know so little of natures inferior to our own, and even of our own nature, and how things are distinguished that belong to ourselves, we have little reason to be shy of confessing ignorance about the nature of God. Therefore I most entirely agree to the two conclusions of the ingenious W. J. wherewith he concludes his letter. But in the meantime (and pursuantly enough thereto) can- not but doubt the concludingness of his very acute rea- sonings against, at least, some of the expressions of that learned person, (Dr. Sherlock,) which he animadverts upon as I perceive you also do, p. 16. of your seventh letter. And even W. J. himself, for with a pious modesty he tells us — concerning infinite natures he presumes not to deter- mine. Letter, p. 8. What he objects against that author's having said the Divine persons are three beings really distinct, (wherein I instance, not intending to rim through that elaborate let- ter,) that then there must be three distinct essences — seems to me a irdpcpynv. I doubt not the author will easily admit it. But what will be the consequence 1 That therefore there are three Deities 1 That cannot be his meaning, nor be consequent from it, if he only means that the Deity comprehends in it three such essences. If indeed he think those three beings are as distinct as Peter, James, and John ; what is said by W. J. against him, I think irrefragable, that then they are no otherwise one, than Peter, James, and John ; and by him against himself; for Peter, James, and John, are not mutually self-conscious, as they are asserted to be : which mutual self-consciousness, since it is sup- posed to make the three Divine persons one, cannot be supposed to leave them so distinct, as tl.ey are with whom it is not found. As to what is observed of the defective expression of this unitive principle by the word consciousness, that bare consciousness, without consent, is no more than bare om- nisciency; sure it is not so much, for consciousness doth not signify omnisciency. We are conscious to ourselves, yet are not omniscient. But I reckon, (as I find he also doth,) that even consent added to consciousness, would yet leave the expression defective, and still want the unifying power which is sought after. For it would infer no more than a sort of moral union, which, in the kind of it, may be found among men, between whom there is so little of natural union (speaking of the numerical nature) that they are actuall)'^ separate. But now may we not suppose (as that which is possible, and actually is, for ought we know) what may be funda- mental to both consciousness and consent, a natural union even of the numerical natures 1 Such a union would not infer a itnity, or identity of these natures, essences, sub- stances, or beings themselves. For, as W. J. hath well urged, (Letter, p. 5, 6.) " Substances upon union are not confounded or identified, or brought to unity of substance, but continuing numerically distinct substances, acquire some mutual community or communication of operations, &c. And deferring the consideration awhile what this would signify towards the unity, notwithstanding, of the Godhead, we shall take notice how accommodatingly to our present purpose W. J. speaks in what I'ollows, where instancing in the chief unions that are known to us, he says, " Our soul and body are tM'o substances really dis- tinct, and in close union with one another. But notwith- standing this, they continue distinct substances under that union. In like manner the human soul of Christ is in union with the Logos, or second person of the trinity, which we call an hyposfatical union. But neither dotli this union make a unity of substance. For the two sub- stances of the Divine and human natures continue dis- tinct under that union." 'Tis true, he adds, " which must not be Eillowed in the unity of the Godhead, where there can be no plurality or multiplicity of substances." Nor do I say that it must, I only say, Do we know, or are we sure, there is no sort uf plurality 7 But if we are sure that there are temporal unions, (i. e. begun in time,) as in ourselves, for instance, of two sub- stances that make but one man, and in our Saviour a hu- man nature and divine that make but one Emmanuel ; how do we know but that there may be three in the God- head that make but one God"? And the rather, because this being supposed, it must also be supposed that they are necessarily and eternally united, and with a conjunct natural impossibility of ever being, or having been, other- wise, whereof the absolute immutability of God must upon that supposition most certainly assure us. And such a sup- posed union will be most remote from making the Deity an aggregate. And for any thing of composition, I reckon we are mo.st strictly bound to believe every thing of the most perfect simplicity of the Divine Being which his word informs us of, and to assent to every thing that is with plain evidence demonstrable of it. But not every thing which the schools would impose upon us, without such testimony or evidence. For as none can "know the things of a man, but the spirit of man which is in him ; so nor can any know the things of God, but the Spirit of God." Nor can I think the argument concluding from the imperfection of a being, in which distinct things concur that were separate, or are de woro united, to the imperfec- tion of a being, in which things some way di.stinct are ne- cessarily and eternally self-united. Nor can therefore agree with W. J. that we are to look (universally) upon real distinction as a mark of superability ; or that clear and distinct conception is to us the rule of partibility. For though I will not affirm that to be the state of all created spirits ; yet I cannot deny it to be possible that God might have created such a being, as should have in it distinct, (assignable) parts, all of them essential to it, and not se- parable from it without the cessation of the whole. But now, as the accession of the human nature to the Divine in the hypostatical union infer no imperfection to the Di- vine, so much le.ss would what things we may suppose naturally, necessarily, and eternally united in the God- head, infer any imperfection therein. I easily admit what is said by W. J., Letter, page 8, That we have no better definition of God, than that he is — a Spirit infinitely perfect. But then, being so far taught by himself my conception of him, I must include in it, this trinal distinction, or a triple somewhat which he af- firms of himself, and without which, or any one whereof, he were not infinitely perfect and consequently not God, and that all together do make one God. As you most apt- ly say of your resemblance of him, a cube, there are in it three dimensions truly distinct from each other, yet all these are but one cube, and if any one of the three were wanting, it were not a cube. Set this down then for the notion of God, that he is a Spirit infinitely perfect, comprehending in that omnimo- dous perfection a trinal distinction, or three persons truly distinct, each whereof is God. What will be the conse- quence 1 that therefore there are three Gods 1 Not at all, but that each of these partaking divine nature give us an inadequate, and altogether a most perfectly adequate and entire, notion of God. Nor would the language of this hy- pothesis being pressed to speak out (as he says in his let- ter) he this — these are not fit to be called three Gods; but not possible (with any truth) to be so called. And whereas he after tells us, these three beings united b)^ similitude of nature, mutual consciousness, consent, co-operation vmder the greatest union possible ; and in that state of union do constitute the to 9ciov, the entire all-com- prehensive Godhead, and adds, this looks somewhat like a conceivable thing. To this I note two things : 1. That he makes it not look like so conceivable a thing, as it really may do. For he leaves out the most important thing, that was as supposable as any of the rest, and prior to a mere similitude, viz. a natural union of fhese (sup- posed) distinct essences, without which they are not under the greatest union possible ; and which, being supposed necessary, and eternal, cannot admit these should he more than one God. 2. I note, that what he opposes to it (.so defectively re- presented) is as defective, that the Christian trinity doth not use to be represented thus, &c. What hurt is therein it, if it can be more intelligibly represented than hath been THE TRINITY IN THE GODHEAD. 149 used 1 Bui his gentle treatment of this hypothesis, which he thought, as he represents it, not altogether unintelligi- bl«, and which with some help may be more intelligible, became one inquiring what might most safely, and with least torture to our own minds, be said or thought in so awful a mystery. It however seems not proper to call this an hypostatical union — much less to say it amounts to no more. It amounts not to so much. For an hypostatical or personal union would make the terms united (the unita, the things or somewhats under this union) become by it one hypostasis or person ; whereas this union must leave them distinct persons or hypostases, but makes them one God. In the use of the phrase hypostatical or personal union the denomination is not taken from the subject of the union, as if the design were to signify that to be divers hypostases, or persons, but from the effect or result of the mentioned union, to signify that which results to be one person or hypostasis. As the matter is plain in the in- stance wherein it is of most noted use, the case of the two natures united in the one person of the Son of God ; where the things united are not suppose^ to be two persons, but two natures so conjoined, as yet to make but one person, which therefore is the negative result or effect of the union, viz. that the person is not muliiplied bj^ the acces- sion of another nature, but remains still only one. But this were a union quite of another kind, viz. of the three hy- postases, still remaining distinct, and concurring in one Godhead. And may not this be supposed without preju- dice to its perfection. For the schools themselves suppose themselves not to admit a composition prejudicial to the perfection of the Godhead, when they admit three modes of subsistence, which are distinct from one another, and from the God- head, which they must admit. For if each of them were the very Godhead, each of them (as is urged against us by you know who) must have three persons belonging to it, as the Godhead hath. And yourself acknowledge three somewhats in the Godhead distinct, or else they could not be three. I will not here urge that if they be three some- whats, they must be three things, not three nothings ; for however uneasy it is to assign a medium between something and nothing, I shall waive that metaphysical contest. But yet collect, that simplicity in the very strictest sense that can be conceived, is not, m your account, to be ascribed to God, either according to his own word, or the reason of things. It may here be urged, How can we conceive this natural union (as I have adventured to phrase it) of the three per- sons, supposing them distinct things, substances, or spirits 1 Is such a union conceivable, as shall make them be but one God, and not be such, as shall make them cease to be three distinct things, substances, or spirits 1 We fmd in- deed the mentioned unions of soul and body in ourselves, and of the two natures in Christ, consistent enough with manifest distinction ; but then the things united are in themselves of most different natures. But if things of .^ congenerous a nature he united, will not their distinction be lost in their union 1 I answer, 1. That a spirit and a spirit are numerically as distinct, as a body and a spirit. And, 2. That we may certainly conceive it as possible to God to have united two or three created spirits, and by as strict imion as is be- tween our souls and bodies, without confounding them ; and I reckon the union between our souls and bodies much more wonderful than that would have been. Why then is an unmade, uncreated union of three spirits less conceivable as that which is to be pre-supposed to their mutual consciousness "? I shall not move, or meddle with, any controversy about the infinity of these three supposed substances or spirits, it being acknowledged on all hands that contemplations of that kind cannot but be above our measure. And well knowing how much easier it is to puzzle oneself upon that question, Anpnssib dari infinitum infinito infinitius, than to speak salisfyinerly and unexceptionabl}' about it to ano- ther. And though I will not use the expressions, as signifying my formed judgment, that there are three things, sub- stances, or spirits in the Godhead, (as you that there are three somewhats,) yet, as I have many years thought, I do 14 still think, that what the learned W. J. doth but more lightly touch of the Son and the Holy Ghost being pro- duced (which term I use, but reciting it, as he doth) not by a voluntary external, but by an internal, necessary, and emanalive act, hath great weight in it. In short, my sense hath long lain thus, and I submit it to your searching and candid judgment, viz. That though we need not have determinate thoughts, how far the Fa- ther, Son, and Holy Ghost are distinguished ; yet we must conceive them in the general to be so far distia- guished, as is really necessary to the founding the di.stinct attributions which the Scriptures do distinctly give them. And that whatever distinction is truly necessary to that purpose, will yet not hinder the two laUer's part'icipation with the first in the Godhead, which can be but one; be- cause that though we are led by plain Scripture, and the very import of that word, to conceive of the Father as the Fountain, yet the Son being from him, and the Holy Ghost from thein both, not contingently, or dependently on will and pleasure, but by eternal, natural, necessary promanation, these two latter are infiiiitely distinguished from the whole creation ; inasmuch as all creatures are contingent beings, or dependent upon will and pleasure, as the character is given us of created things. Rev. iv. 11. Thou hast made all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created. But that whatever is what it is neces- sarilj^, is God. For I have no doubt but the dreams of some, more anciently, and of late, concerning necessary matter, and the sophisms of Spinosa and some others, tending to prove the necessity and identitj' of all substance, are (with what they aim to evince) demonstrably false. The sum of all will be this, 1. That we can be more certain of nothing than that there is but one God. 2. We are most sure the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are sufficiently distinguished to give a just ground to the distinct attributions, which are in the Scripture severally given to them. 3. We are not sure what that sufficient distinction is; (wherein I find j-ou saying with me over and over) but whereas you rightly make the v.'ord person applicable to God, but in a sense analogous to that which olnains of it with men ; why may it not be said it may be filly applica- ble, for ought we know, in a sense analogous to that no- tion of it among men, which makesa/;c/-5<)7i signify an in- telligent hypostasis, and so three distinct intelligent hypos- tases. 4. But if that sufficient distinction can be no less, than that there be in the Godhead three distinct intelligent hy- postases, each having its own distinct singular intelligent nature, with its proper personality belonging to it, we know nothing to the contraiy, but that the necessary eter- nal nature of the Godhead may admit thereof. If any can from plain Scripture testimonj*, or cogent reason, evince the contrary, let the evidence be produced. In the mean- time we need notimpcse upon ourselves any formal denial of it. 5. If the contrary can be evidenced, and that hereupon it be designed to conclude that there can be but one intel- ligent hypostasis in the Godhead, and therefore that the Son and the Holy Ghost are but creatures, the last refuge must be to deny the former consequence, and to allege that though the same finite singular nature cannot well be understood to remain entirely to one, and be communica- ted entirely to another, and another, the case will not be the same, speaking of an infinite nature. ^ Sir, If what is here said shall occasion to you any new thoughts that you shall judge maj-^ be of common use, I conceive there will be no need of publishing my letter, but only that you be pleased to communicate your ovro. senti- ments, as from yourself which will have so much the more of authoiity and usefulness with them. The most considerable thing that I have hinted, is the necessary pro- manation of the Son, and Holy Ghost, that must distin- guish them from contingent beings, and so from creatures; which if vou think improveable to any good purpose, as it hath been with me a thought many years old. so I suppose it not new to you, and being now' resumed by you, upon 150 A CALM DISCOURSE OP this occasion, you will easily cultivate it to better advan- tage than any words of mine can give it. But if you think it advisable that any part of my letter be published, if you please to signify your mind to that purpose in one line to marked it will come sealed to my view, and will give opportunity of offering my thoughts to you, what parts I would have suppressed, which will be such only, as shall leave the rest the fuller testimony of my being, Sir, Your most sincere honourer, and most respectful humble servant, Anonym. Poiret's method of proving a trinity in the Godhead, though it call itself mathematical or geometrical, is with me much less convictive, than the plain scriptural way. LETTER n. Sin, Your eighth letter happening to come to my view be- fore it W3,s printed off, I have the opportunity of taking no- tice to you that it quite misrepresents the intent of the let- ter to you subscribed Anonymous, which it makes to be the defending or excusing some expressions of Dr. Sher- lock's ; which indeed was the least considerable thing, if it were any thing at all, in the design of that letter, and not altogether accidental to it. The true design of it was, that there might be a clearer foundation asserted (as possible at least) to the doctrine of the incarnation and satisfaction of the Son of God. Nor can the forti quod sic here be solved by \.\\q forte quod non, the exigency of the case be- ing such, as that if more be possible it will be highly requi- site ; and that it cannot well be avoided to assert more, unless it can be clearly evinced that more is impossible. Nor yet is it necessary to determine how much more is necessarj'. But not only the commonly received frame of Christian doctrine doth seem to require somewhat be- yond what the mere civil or respective notion of the word person imports; but also the plain letter of Scripture, which says, Heb. i. 3, that the Son of God is the express image of the Father's hypostasis, which seems to signify there are two hypostases, and other Scriptures seem to say enough, whence we may with parity of reason collect a third. Now that letter intimates, I think, sufficient mat- ter of doubt, whether hypostasis doth not signify much more than person, in }'our sense. The principal thing that letter humbly offered to consi- deration — i. e. whether supposing a greater distinction than you have assigned be necessary, it may not be defend- ed, by the just supposal that the proinanation of the second or third persons (or hypostases rather) howsoever diverse they are, is by natural eternal necessity, not contingent, or depending upon will and pleasure, as all created beings is and doth — is altogether waived. That letter was written with design of giving you the occasion of considering what might be further requisite and possible to bea.sserted for the serving of the truth, and with that sincerity and plenitude of respect to you that it might be wholly iii your own power to do it in such a way, as wherein not at all to disserve yourself. Which temper of mind is still the same with Rev. Sir, Your most raifeigned honourer, and humble servant. Anonym. Decemb. 91. LETTER III. Worthy Sir, I AM v«ry loath troublesomelv to importune you. But »he very little time I had for the view of your eighth let- ter, before I wrote mine by the last post, not allowing me fully to write my sense as to that part which concerned my former letter, I take leave now to add, thi-t my design in it (as well as the professed design of the letter itself) was to offer you the occasion of employing that clear un- derstanding, wherewith God hath blest you, above most, in consideringwhether a greaterlatitude cannot be allowed us in conceiving the distinction of the three in the God- head consistently with the unity thereof, than your notion of a person will extend to. And if it can, whether it ought not to be represented (at least as possible) to give a less exceptionable ground to the doctrines of the incarnation and satisfaction of the second person, in order whereto it seems to me highly requisite. This was that I really in- tended, and not the vindicating the sentiments of that au- thor, which 3^ ou might observe that letter animadverts upon. The Scripture seems to allow a greater latitude, by the ground it gives us to apprehend three hypostases ; which so much differ from the notion you give of persons, that one hypostasis may sustain three .such persons as you de- scribe. The only thing that seems to straiten us in this matter, is the usual doctrine of the schools about the Di- vine simplicity. I confess I greatly coveted to have had your thoughts engaged in sifting and examining that doctrine ; so far as to consider whether there be really any thing in it cogent and demonstrable, that will be repug- nant to what is overturned in that letter. And I the rather desired more room might be gained in this matter, appre- hending the unitarians (as they more lately affect to call themselves) might upon the whole, think you more theirs than ours ; and while they agree with you concerning the possibility of such a trinity as you assert, may judge their advantage against the other mentioned doctrines, no less than it was. My desiring that letter of mine might not be printed, was most agreeable to what I intended in writing it ; that was, only to suggest to you somewhat (very loosely) that I reckoned you more capable than any man I knew, to cultivate, and improve, to the great service of the common Christian cause. And that you might seem to say, what you might, upon your own search, find safe and fit to be said, as merely from yourself, without taking notice what occasion was given you by any such letter at all. Had I designed it for public view, it should have been writ with more care, and with more (expressed) respect to you. But if, upon the whole, you judge there is nothing in it consi- derable to the purposes it mentions, my further request is, you will please rather to suppress that part of your letter which concerns it, (for which I suppose there is yet oppor- tunity,) and take no notice any such letter came to your hands. I am, Reverend Sir, Your most respectful, humble servant, Anonym. December 19, 91. SUMMARY PROPOSITIONS. Collected, owt of the foregoing discourses, more briefly offer- ing to view the substance of what is cowtairied in them. 1. Of the unity of the Godhead there can be no doubt, it being in reason demonstrable, and most expressly often asserted in Scripture. 2. That there is a trinity in the Godhead, of Father, Son, or Word, and Holy Ghost, is the plain, obvious sense of so many scriptures, that it apparently tends to frustrate the design of the whole Scripture revelation, and to make it useless, not to admit this trinity, or otherwise to under- stand such scriptures. 3. That therefore the devising any other sense of such scriptures ought by no means to be attempted, unless this trinity in the Godhead can be evidently demonstrated to be impossible. 4. That the impossibility of it can never be demonstra- THE TRINITY IN THE GODHEAD. 151 ted from the mere uniti/ ol me Godhead, -vhich may be such, as to admit these distinctions in it, for aught we know. 5. Nothing is more appropriate to the Godhead than to be a necessarily existent, intelligent Being : since all crea- tures, whether intel igent or unintelligent, are conlingent, depending upon the will of the necessary, intelligent Be- ing. 6. If therefore the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost do co- exist in the Godhead necessarily, they cannot but be God. 7. And if the first be conceiv^ed as the fountain, the se- cond as by natural, necessary (not voluntary, promanation from the first, the third by natural, necessary (not volun- tary) spiration, so as that neither uf these latter could have been otherwise ; this aptly agrees with the notions of Fa- ther, Son, and Spirit distinctly put upon them, and infi- nitely distinguishes the two latter from all creatures that depend upon will and pleasure. 8. Whatever distinction there be of these three among themselves, yet the first being the original, the second be- ing by that promanation necessarily and eternally united with the first, the third by such spiration united necessari- ly and eternally with both the other, inasmuch as eternity and necessity of existence admit no change, this union must be inviolable and everlasting, and thereupon the Godhead which they constitute can be but one. 9. We have among the creatures, and even in ourselves, instances of very different natures, continuing distinct, but so miited as to be one thing ; and it were more easily .sup- posable of congenerous natures. 10. If such union with distinction be impossible in the Godhead, it must not be from any repugnancy in the thing itself, since very intimate union, with continuing distmc- tion, is in itself no impossible thing; but from somewhat peculiar to the Divine Being. 11. That peculiarity, since it cannot be unity (which be- cause it may admit distinctions in one and the same thing, we are not sure it cannot be so in the Godhead) must be that simplicity commonly wont to be ascribed to the Di- vine nature. 12. Such simplicity as shall exclude that distinction, which shall appear necessary in the present case, is not by express Scripture any where ascribed to God ; and there- fore must be rationally demonstrated of him, if it shall be judged to belong at all to him. 13. Absolute simplicity is not a perfection, nor is by any ascribed to God. Not by the Socinians themselves, who ascribe to him the several intellectual and moral excellen- cies, that ai'e attributed to him in the Scriptures, of which they give very different definitions, as may be seen in their own Volkelius at large, which should signify them not to be counted, in all respects, the same thing. 14. That is not a just consequence, which is the most plausible one that seems capable of being alleged for such absolute simplicity, that otherwise there would be a composition admitted in the Divine nature, which would import an imperfection inconsistent with Deity. For the several excellencies that concur in it, howsoever distin- guished, being never put together, nor having ever ex- isted apart, but in eternal, necessar}'^ union, though they may make some sort of variety, import no proper compo- sition, and carry with them more apparent perfection, than absolute omnimodous simplicity can be conceived to do. 15. Such a supposed possible variety even of individual natures in the Deity, some way differing from each other, infers not an unbounded liberty of conceiving what plu- ralities therein we please or can imagine. The divine reve- lation, which could only justify, doth also limit us, herein, mentioning three distinct I's or He's, and no more. 16. The several attributes which are common to these three, do to our apprehension, and way of conceiving things, require less distinction; no more, for ought we know, than may arise from their being variously modified, according to the distinction of objects, or other extrinsical things, to which they may be referred. We that so little know how our own souls, and the powers and principles that belong to them, do differ from one another, and from them, must be supposed more igno- rant, and should be less curious, in this. A LETTER TO A FRIEND, CONCERNING A POSTSCRIPT. TO THE DEFENCE OE DR. SHERLOCK'S NOTION OF THE TRIN- ITY IN UNITY, RELATING TO THE CALM AND SOBER IN- quiky upon the same subject. Sir, I FIND a postscript to the newly published deience of Dr. Sherlock's notion of the Trinity in Unity, takes no- tice of the inquiry concerning the possibilitv of a trinity in the Godhead. He that writes it seems .somewhat out of humour, or not in such as it is decent to hope is more usual with him : and I can't guess for what, unless that one, whom he imagines a dissenter, hath adventured to cast his eyes that way that he did his. But for that imagina- tion he may have as little ground, as I to think the dean's de- fender is the dean ; and a.s little as he had to saj- the in- quirer took great care that no man should suspect that he favours the dean in his notion. Here he is quite out in his guess ; for the inquirer took no such care at all, but nakedly to represent his own sentiments as they were, whether they agreed with the dean's, or wherein they difiered : and really cares not who knows that he hath not so little kind- ness either for truth or for him, as to abandon or decline what he thinks to be true for his sake, or (as he expressed himself, p. 29. of that discourse) because he said it. But the defender represents the dean as much of ano- ther temper, and that he will thank him for not favouring him in his notions. But yet he says, that though the in- quirer doth not in every particular say what the dean says, yet he says what will justify him against the charge of tri- theism. And is there any hurt to him in that 1 What a strange man doth he make the dean ! as if he could not be pleased unless he alone did engross truth! Will he thank a man for not favouring his notions, and yet would blame him for not saying in every particular what he says, though he say what will justify him against the heaviest charge framed against him"? may one neither be allowed to agree with him, nor disagree 1 But, Sir, the defender's discourse hath no design (nor I believe he himself) to disprove the possibility of a trinity in the ever blessed Godhead. Therefore the inquirer is safe from him as to the principal design he is concerned for, it is all one to him if it still appear possible in what way it be so represented, that is intelligible, consistent with itself, and with other truth ; so that it is hardly worth the while to him, further to inquire whether the dean's In-postasis or his be better, if cither be found imexceptionably safe and good. But because the defender hath, to give preference to the one, misrepresented both with some appearing dis- advantage to the cause itself, what he says ought to be considered. And the whole matter will be reduced to this twofold inquiry : 1. Whether the inqiiirer hath said more than the dean, or more ihan is defensible, of the distinction of the sacred three in the Godhead. 2. Whether the dean hath said so much as the inquirer, or so much as was requisite of their union. 1. For the former, the defender, p. 103. mentions the dean's notion of three infinite minds or spirits ; and makes the inquirer to have been proving three spirits, three dis- tinct essences, three individual natures, in the Godhead; and then adds, " for my part, I cannot tell where the differ- ence is, unless it be in the term infinite." 'Tis indeed strange the inquirer should have said more than the dean, if there were no difference, unless in the term infinite, wherein he must have said infinitely less. But he at length apprehends another difference, though he after labours to make it none, riz. that the inquirer disputes, but asserts nothing, and be fancies he doth so to shelter himself from the animadverter, of whom he says he seems to be terribly afraid. Here he puts the dean into a fit of kindness and good nature, allowing the inquirer to partake with him in his fears, though not in his notions, as more sacred. But he herein understands not the inquirer, who if he had been so terriblv afraid, could very easily have said nothing; and who was reallv afraid of a greater animadverter, thinking it too great boldness, under his 152 A LETTER TO A FRIEND eye, to speak confidently of his own peculiarities, and that lay folded up in so venerable darkness. He thought it enough, in oppcsition to the daring person (whoever he was) with whom he was concerned, that so peremptorily pronounced the trinity an absurdity, a contradiction, non- sense, and an impossibility, to represent what he proposed as possible for ought he knew. And now the defender will have the dean to have done no more. And with all my heart let him have done no more, if he and his animadverter, and the rest of the world, will so agree it: but he will have the inquirer to have done more, and to be much more exposed to the charge of tri- theism, by asserting three distinct essences, three Individ ual natures, and three spiritual beings in the Godhead. This is indeed very marvellous, that the inquirer should expose himself to the charge of tritheism by asserting all this, when but a few lines before, upon the same page, he is said to have asserted nothing ! But he may as well make the inquirer in asserting nothing to have asserted all this, as the dean in asserting all this to have asserted nothing. And where the inquirer hath said in express words that the sacred three are three distinct substances I can't find. And we must in great part alter the common notion of substance to make it affirmable of God at all, vi^. that it doth substare accidentibiis, which I believe the dean will no more than the inquirer .suppose the Divine Being to admit. But 'tis true, that there is somewhat more con- siderable in the notion of substance, according whereto, if the dean can make a shift to avoid the having of any in- convenient thing proved upon him by consequence, I hope the inquirer may find a way to escape as well. But whereas he says, the dean allows but one divme es- sence, and one individual nature, in the Godhead repeated in three persons, but without multiplication, as he says he had already explained it; this hath occasioned me to look back to that explanation, and if he thinks the allowing but one divine essence, and one individual nature, in the God- head, will agree with what the dean hath said in his vindi- cation, I shall not envy him, nor vow go about to disprove it. But I confess I see not how it can agree with what the defender says in this his explanation itself, when, p. 23. he tells us, the Son is the living subsisting image of the Father, and the image and the prototype cannot be the same, but must be two. No man is his own image, nor is an image the image of itself And he adds, this is so self-evident, &c. But whereas the distinction all this while might be understood to be hut modal, and that appears to be the defender's present (whatever was the dean's former) meaning, that the three subsistences differ only in their different manner of subsisting; yet with this meaning his other words do little agree, for he plainly asserts a real distinction of three in the same individual numerical na- ture. And who did ever make a real distinction to be but modall More expressly he had said before, (p. 18.) the Divine nature is one individual nature, but not one single nature, for one single nature can be but one person whe- ther in God or man. I shall not here discuss with him the criticism upon which he lays so mighty stress, of one individual nature and one single nature, hut take the terms he chooses, and if the Divine nature be not one single nature, it must be double, it must be triple. And what doth this come to Jess than three natures 1 unless all ordinary forms of speech must be quite abandoned and forsaken. And wherein doth it come short of what is said by the inquirer! p. 141. " This iQvm individual must (in the case now supposed, as possible not as certain) admit of a twofold application, either to the distinct essence of the Father, or of the Son, or of the Holy Ghost; or to the entire essence of the Godhead, in which these three do concur. Each of these conceived by itself, are (according to this supposition) individual es- sences, but conceived together they are the entire indivi- dual essence of God, for there is but one such essence and no more, and it can never be multiplied nor divided into more of the same name and nature." Duplicity, tripli- city, are admitted ; simplicity rejected. If simple and single be of the same signification, where is the differ- ence, but that the one thinks absolute omnimodous simpli- city is not to be affirmed of the Dmne nauire, as lie often a Lettor, p. 24, SS. speaks : the other says downright, it is not single or sim- ple without limitation. The one denies multiplication of it, so doth the other. The one indeed speaks positively, the other doth but suppose what he says as possible, not certain. And there is indeed some difference between supposing a thing as possible for ought one knows ; and affirming it so po.sitively, as to impute heresy, and non- sense, to all gainsayers. But both bring for proof, the same thing, the incarnation ; as in the postscript, the de- fender takes notice the inquirer doth, p. 102. And so doth he himself in his letter, p. 102. — " The Divine nature was incarnate in Christ, he was perfect God and perfect man ; and if there was but one single Divine nature in all three persons, this one single Divine nature was incarnate, and therefore the Father and the Holy Ghost, who are this sin- gle Divine nature, as well as the Son, must be as much in- carnate as the Son was." He makes the contrary absurd, and brings in (fitly enough) VictorinusAfer teaching, that we ought not to say, nor is it lawful to say, that there is but one substance, i. e. as he paraphrases it, one single sub- sisting nature (therefore there must be three single subsist- ing natures) and three persons. For if this same sub- stance did and suffered all (patri-passiani et nos) we must be Patripassians, which God forbid. And what the defender alleges from the ancients, against the Sabellians, allowing only =^ a trinity of names, and his taking the rpoirot v-nap^ecoi in the concrete not in ab- stract^ fully enough speaks the inquirer's sense, his account- ing the contrary too fine and metaphysical for him, was what was writ to Dr. Wallis, (Calm Discourse, p. 147.) too fine or too little solitl, &c. In short, till it can be effectually proved, that mind and spirit do not signify somewhat as absolute as nature or es- sence, (or rather more than the former, which signifies the principle of operation as the other of being,) and till it can be as well proved, that asserting a thing as certain, so as to pronounce it heresy and nonsense to think otherwise, is less than only to propose it as possible, or inquire whether it be so or no, the dean must be judged by every one that understands common sense, to have heightened the dis- tinction of three persons at least as much as the inquirer. And whether the inquirer have supposed more than is de- fensible against the defender's objections, will be considered by and by in its proper place. In the meantime let it, 2. Be examined whether the dean has said as much for salving the unity of the Godhead as the inquirer, or as much as is requisite to that purpose. And here our busi- ness will be short, for it all turns upon that one single point, whether mutual consciou.sness be that union which must be acknowledged, or suppose it only. For which we need only appeal to common reason, whether being do not in the natural order precede even the power of working; and consequently whether being united vitally, precede not the possibility of acting agreeably to that united state: where- upon the inquiry is not concerning actual conscience only, but (as he speaks) consciousness. Is it possible any three persons or intelligent subsistences, should naturally have vital perception of each other's internal motions and sen- sations, without being vitally preunited 1 I say naturally, for that God might give to three created spirits a temporary perception of each other without bringing them into a stated union each with other, is little to be doubted; as a spirit may assume a body and animate it pro tempore without being substantially united with it. And if that body were also a spirit, they might 7;ro tevipore, for ought we know, by extraordinary divine disposition (for within the ordinary course of nature we know of no such intimacy of created spirits to another) be quasi anima: to one another. But if naturally they were so to mingle and transfuse sensations mutually into each other, they must be naturally, first, in vital union with one another. Nor therefore did the in- quirer mistake the dean's notion as the defender fancies in the passage he quotes, p. 104, as if he took mutual con- sciousness for mere mutual perspection. For though scire abstractedly taken, doth not signify more than perspicere, yet the inquirer in that passage, speaking of a never so per- fect mutual perspection, properly enough expressed there- by as great a feeling such spirits were supposed lo have ol each other, in themselves, as mutual consciousness is apt CONCERNING THE POSTSCRIPT, &c. to sigaily, or as the dean can yet be supposed to have meant, that perspection being more perfect which produces gusts and relishes suitable to the object, than that which stays in mere speculation only. And upon the whole, it seems very strange the defender should say. " If such an internal, vital sensation, be not an essential union, he believes no man can tell what it is." For how can such adiuil sensation be imagined to be u7iion? As well might the use of sense itself (speaking of any thing singly to which it belongs) be said to be constituent form, or (consequently) the doing any thing that proceeds from reason, to be the form of a man. So the writing a book, should be the author. And whereas he says, " it is certain the dean took it to be so, and therefore he did not leave out a natural eternal union;" it follows, indeed, that he did not leave it out, in his mind and design, but he neveriheless left it out of his book, and therefore said not enough there to salve the unity of the Godhead, but ought to have insist- ed upon somewhat prior to mutual consciousness, as con- stituent of that unity, and which might make the three one, and not merely argue them to be so. But now (p. 105) he comes to find as great fault with the inquirer's way of maintaining this unity, and because he is resolved to dislike it, if he can't find it faulty, sets himself to make it so. The temper of mind wherewith he writes to this purpose what follows, (p. 105.) and onwards to the end, so soon and so constantly shows itself, that no man whose mind is not in the same disorder will upon trial apprehend any thing in it, but such heat as dwells in darkness. And he himself hath given the document, which may be a measure to any apprehensive reader :i< " True divine wisdom rests not on an illnatured and per- verse spirit;" I understand it, " while the ill fit lasts." But 'lis strange he could write those words without any self- reflection. The thing to be revenged is, that the inquirer did freely speak his thoughts, wherein he judged the dean's Ay^o/iie.si's defective, his not taking notice of what he reckoned natu- rally antecedent and fundamental to mutual con.sciousness: a most intimate, natural, necessary, eternal union of the sacred three. If the inquirer spake sincerely, as he under- stood the matter, and him, and it evidently appear the de- fender did not so, I only say the wronged person hath much the advantage, and wishes him no other harm, than such gentle regrets, as are necessary to set him right with himself, and his higher Judge. He says, he (the inquirei) represents this unity by the union of soul and bod}'^, and by the union of the Divine and human nature, &c. 'Tis true, he partly doth so, but more fully by the (sup- posed union of) three created spirits; (to which he that will may see, he only makes them a lower step;) and he says, (with respect especially to the former of these,) " That a union supposable to be originally, eternally, and by natu- ral necessity in the most perfect Being, is to be thouglit imexpressibly more perfect than any other." But (he adds) " these are personal imions, and therefore cannot be the union of the Godhead." And he very well knew (for he had but little before cited the passage) that the inquirer never intended them so, but only to represent that the union of the three in the Godhead, could not be reasonably thought less possible. What he further adds is much stranger, (and yet herein I am resolved to put charity towards him to the utmost stretch, as he professes to have done his understanding,) for he says — as far as he can possibly understand, and that he should be glad to be better informed, though there is some reason to apprehend that former displeasure darkened his understanding, (and even dimmed his eye-sight,) which yet I hope hath its more lucid intervals, and that this dis- temper is not a fixed habit with him. And what is it now that he cannot possibly understand otherwise 1 — that no other union will satisfy him {viz. the inquirer) but such a union of three spiritual beings and individual natures as b)^ their composition constitute the Godhead, as the com- position of soul and body do the man ; i. e. he cannot understand but he means what he expressly denies. Who can help so cross an understanding"? If he had not had his very finger upon the place where the inquirer says"^ in express words, " I peremptorily deny all composition in b Sec his letter, p. 1. e Ca.!m Discmirie. 153 the being of God," this had been more excusable ; besides much said to the same purposed elsewhere. It had been ingenuous in any man not to impute that to another, as his lueaning, which in the plainest terms he dLsavows, as none of his meaning : and it had been prudent m the dean Cor of his defender) of all mankind not to have done so in the pre- sent case, as will further be seen in due time. But he takes it for an affront, when he fancies a man to come too near him. He adds, " for this reason he disputes earnest!} against the universal, absolute, omnimodous simplicity of the Divine nature, and will not allow that wisdom, power and goodness, are the same thing in God, and distinguished into different conceptions by us, only through the weak- ness of our understandings, which cannot comprehend an infinite Being in one thought, and therefore must, as well as we can, contemplate him by parts." I know not what he means by earnestly, the matter was weighty, and it is true. He was in writing about it in no disjjosition to jest. But it's said, "he disputed against the universal, absolute^ omnimodous simplicity of the Divine nature." I hope the defender in this rneajis honestly, but he speaks very improperly, for it supposes him to think that the universal, absolute, omnimodous simplicity, so earnestly disputed against, did really belong to the Divine nature ; but I can scarce believe him to think so, and therefore he should have said, his disputation tended to prove it not lo belong. If he {viz. the defender, or the dean) did really think it did, they^ or he, must be very singular in that sentiment, I would have them name me the man that ever laid do-wn and asserted such a po>i(ion. Some I know have said of that sacied Being, that it is summe simpler, or more simple than any thing else; but that imports not universal, abso- lute, omnimodous simplicity, which is impossible to be s. perfection, or therefore to belong to the Divine nature. No man that ever acknowledged a trinity- of persons even modally distinguished, could ever pretend it, for such sim- plicity excludes all modes. Nay, the antitrinitarians them- selves can never be for it, as the Calm Discourse hath shown. And if the dean be, he is gone into the remotest extreme from what he held (and plainly enough seems still to hold) that ever man of sense did. But for what is added, that he " will not allow that v%is- dom, power, and goodness, are the same thing in God:" this is not faiil}^ said, civility allows me not to say, untrul}-. There is no word in the place he cites, nor any where in that book, that signifies not allowing; 'tis intimated we are not instructed " by the Scripture to conceive of the Divine nature, as, in every respect, most absolutely simple," or that power, wisdom, goodness in the abstract, are the snme thing, and that our difficulty is great to apprehend tJiem really undistinguishable. And let me serio\isly a.-ik him- .sclf. doth he in good earnest think it is only through the weakness of our understandings that we distinguish the notions of the Divine wisdom, power, and goodness? Cer- tainly it were great weakness of understanding to define them alike. I believe he never met Miih the wri'er yet thai distinguished them less, than ratione ratiocim'.ta In contradistinction to ratiocinmile, which implies somewhat corresponding to our distinct norions of them (eminently and not formally) in iiatura rei. And whereas he further says, "This prepared his wnv to make goodness, wisdom, power, — a natural trinitA- in unity," herein the defender is mistaken. This is not the trinitij which the inquirer's discourse was ever intended to terminate in, as he himself hath expressly said, and the defender takes notice of it; which makes me wonder how he could think it v^-tis so intended.citing the very passage,' where the inquirer "professes not to judge, that we ai^ under the precise notions of power, -wisdom, and goodness, to conceive of the Father, Son, and Hoh- Ghost." But why then were these three so much discoursed of before? They are three most celebrated di\ane attributes, wherein we have our most immediate and very principal concern. And some have thought the trinity was most fitly to be conceived by them. The inquirer did not think so : but he thought, first, it would be requisite to have our minds dis- entangled from any apprehended necessity of conceiving them to be in all respects the very same things; nor are they the very same, if they be so "distinguished, as Ls ex- d Calm Disroiitse. e Calm Dneoune. 154 A LETTER TO A FRIEND pressed in the sixteenth of the summary propositions-/ where also they are each of them said to be common to Father Son and Holy Ghost, whence therefore it is im- possible they should be thought to distinguish Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. But that some distinction being adm'itted even of them, this might facilitate to us our con- ception of the greater distinction which must be, of Father, Son, and Spirit, as is expressed p. 140. Indeed he did not think fit to interrupt his discourse by staying to show reasons why he did not rest in that account alone of the trinity, though it might seem plausible, or not absurd, but proceeded further to what was more satisfying to himself, and might be so to other men. And (as the intervening series of his discourse leads thereto) this is more directly done, &c. especially where he comes to speak of the ne- cessary coexistence, and the (as necessary and natural) order of the Father, Son, and Spirit, towards each other. The second being, not by any intervening act of will, but by necessary eternal promanalion, from the first, and the third from both. And the true reason why power, wisdom, and goodness, were not thought expressive of the distinc- tion of Father, Son, and Spirit, but common to each of them (as is said, Summary Prop. 16.) was, that the two latter cannot but be necessary emanations, most connatural to their original, as is truly suggested by the defender, p. HI. If you object, (as the defender brings in the inquirer saying,) That this gives us the notion of a compounded Deity, &c. this, i. e. the supposition that absolute omni- modous simplicity belongs not to it, is the thing which may be thought to give us this notion. And he tells us, he (the inquirer) answers this difficulty, by giving us a new notion of a composituni. And what 's that which he calls a new notion 1 That a compositum seems to imply pre- existing component, that brings such things together; and supposes such and such more simple things to have pre- existed apart, or separate, and to be brought afterwards together into a united state. And indeed is this a new notion 1 as new as the creation ? Let him show me an instance through the whole created universe of beings, (and for the uncreated being the de- fender (now at this time) disputes against any composition there, und the inquirer denies any,) first, where there hath been a composituvi without a pre-existing component, or next, the compounded parts whereof, if substantial, did not in order of nature pre-exist separate ; i. e. whether esse simplidter, do not naturally precede esse tale, or which is all one, to our present purpose, whether they were not capable hereof if the Creator pleased. Let any man, I say, tell me where was there ever a.co7nposituni made by substantial union that did not consist of once separate or of separable parts. But note his admirable following supposition, that is to say, That if a man, suppose, who consists of body and soul, had been from eternity, without a maker, and his soul and body had never subsisted apart, he could not have been said to have been a compounded creature 1 This is said with design most groundlessly (as we shall see) to fasten an absurd consequence upon the inquirer, and see how it lucks. Did ever any man undertake to reprove an absur- dity with greater absurdity 1 A creature without a maker ! what sort of creature must this be 1 We have a pretty say- ing quoted in the defender's letter; He that writes lies down ; and we are apt enough too, when we write, to trip and fall down, and ought in such cases to be merciful to one another, even though he that falls should be in no danger of hurting his forehead, much more if he be. What was another man's turn now, may be mine next. But let the supposition proceed, and put we being in- stead of creature, which no doubt was the defender's mean- ing, for creature he must needs know it could not be that had no maker. And what then 1 " Why he should not" (says he) '" have been said to be compounded, though he would have had the same parts that he has now." We have here a self-confounding supposition, which having done that first, cannot hurt him whom it was designed to confound, being taken in season. Grant one, and you grant a thousand. A being made up of a soul and a bod)'', is so imperfect an entity, as could not be of itself Nothing is of itself which is not absolutely perfect. If he mind to disprove this, let him try his faculty when he pleases against f Calm Discourse. it, and (which I sincerely believe he never intends) toge- ther with it, against all religion. But besides, he hath destroyed his own supposition himself (to put us out of that danger) by saying in plain words, p. 10. '' We have no notion of an eternal and necessary existence, but in an absolute perfect and infinite nature." Now say I, what is so perfect, and hath whatever belongs to it necessarily, though distinguishable things belong to it, hath no parts; for what are parts, but such things as can be parted 1 Such things as never were parted, and never can be, (as 'tis non- sense to talk of those things being parted that are united necessarily, and of themselves,) are no parts, if partiri, whence they are so called, must not (and herein he cannot so fool the whole Christian world, as to make it concur wiih him) lose its signification to serve a turn. Though the things be real, their partibility is not real. If any indeed will call them parts, because they may be conceived or con- templated apart, as parts merely conceptible are no preju- dice to the perfection of the Divine Being, so are such conceivable parts acknowledged by this author himself in express words ;? " we cannot comprehend an infinite Being in one thought, and therefore must as well as we can contemplate him by parts." God can as little admit to be a part of any thing, as to have any thing a part of him. And yet 'tis no prejudice to the dignity and perfec- tion of his being, to conceive of him conjunctly with other things, as when we make him depart (subject or predicate) of a proposition. All his disputation therefore against parts and composition in the Deity, is against a figment, or no present adversary. For my part I am of his mind, and I should be obliged to thank him that this once he vouchsafes to let me be on his side, when he knows I am, if he did not take so A'ast pains to make others not know it. How hard a thing is it for an angry man (especially when he knows not wh\') to write with a sincere mind. But hath he in all this fervent bluster a present concern at this time for the honour of the Divine Being, (as God forbid I should think he never hath,) what is that he sup- poses injurious to it % Is it the words, parts and compounds 1 or is it the things supposed to be united in the Divine Being 1 The words he knows to be his own, and let him dispose of them more ineptly if he can tell how : parts that were never put together, never parted, nor ever shall be the one or other ; i. e. that never were or will be parts, and a compound of such parts ! But now for the things upon which he would obtrude these words, — three essences, natures, (or if you please, infinite minds or spirits,) sig- nified by the names of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, m eternal union, but distinct in the being of God. — Let us consider his disputation against them united, or in union, according to its double aspect: First, upon the hypothesis or supposition of them : Secondly, upon himself. First, Consider his disputation as levelled against the hypothesis or supposition of such distinct essences, na- tures, minds, spirits, in necessary, eternal union in the Divine Being. And one of his arguments against it is in those words of his : One principal argument against it (here put out parts and composition which are his own, and we have no more to do with them) is, that God is eternal and unmade, and whatsoever hath parts, (says he,) hath such essences in it, must have a maker. And here let him prove his consequence, and his business is done, viz. both ways, as will be seen by and by. But let him show the incon- sistency between a thing's having such distinct essences naturally and necessarily united in it, (as the supposition to be argued against is, and before ought to have been justly stated,) and it's being eternal and unmade. But how that is to be evinced I cannot so much as guess ; con- fident afl[irmation, against the most obvious tenor of God's own word, is of little account. Who shall ascend into the heavens'? or fathom the depths'? or can have that perspec- tion of God's incomprehensible nature, as without (and visibly against) his own revelation to be able, without great rashness, to pronounce .so concerning him'? Butsotoyishan argument as here follows, is worse than the position ; i. e. when one shall say, that for ought we know there may be three distinct essences by an eternal unmade union, united into one, in the being of God ; any man should say, and be so vain as to expect to be regarded, that because they g His Letter, p. 105. CONCERNING THE POSTSCRIPT, &c. 155 are united by an eternal and unmade union, therefore they are not united by an eternal and natural luiion ! If there be not a contradiction in the terms to disprove a thing, by itself, is to say nothing, or is all one with proving a thing by itself. He proceeds, to what hath nothing in it like an argument, but against its own conceit of parts, and that very trifling too : " There can be but one eternal nature in God; but if there be three — there must be three." This 'tis now come to, proving his point by itself Here he makes sure work to have nothing denied, but then nothing is proved, no advance is made; if there be three, there must be three. But if there be three what ? eternal parts ? there must be three different natures, or else they would be the same. (What! though distinct?) But this supposes somebody said the lir.st ; and who 1 himself; therefore he is disproving himself If I had said so, I would have denied his consequence, far there may be simi- lar parts; whereas by different, he seems to mean dis- similar. He says, " not only distinct, but different natures." Now j'ou have that wonderful thing talked of sometimes, but never brought to view before, a di.stinction without a difl"erence. 'Tis strange how an}- things should be dis- tinct, and no way different. What distinguishes them if they differ by nothing 1 This different, applied to this pre- sent case, is his own word, coined to introduce a notion that is not new to Christians only, but to all mankind. If by different natures he means (as he seems) of a different kind, who thought of such a difference 1 But I trow, things that differ in number, do as truly differ, (however essentially cohering,) though not so widely. His next is, that though we have a natural notion of an eternal Being, we have no notion of three eternal essences (which again I put instead of his parts) which necessarily' coexist in an eternal union. Doth he mean we are to dis- believe every thing of God whereof we have not a natural notion '? Then to what purpose is a divine revelation 1 Is this notion of God pretended to be naturaH 'Tis enough, if such a notion be most favoured by his own revelation, who best understands his own nature, and theie be not evident natural notion against it. He forgot tliat he had said, (Defence, p. 5.) " If every thing which we have no positive idea of must be allowed to contradict reason, we shall find contradictions enough ;" adding, " We must con- fess a great many things to be true, which we have no idea of," &c. He adds, " Once more, we have no notion of an eternal and necessary existence, but in an absolutely per- fect and infinite nature, but if there be" (I here again leave out his three parts, because I design to consider if there be any thing of strength brought against what was supposed possible by the inquirer, not against his fiction, which I trouble not myself any further with) " three spiritual beings — neither of them can be absolutel}^ perfect and infinite," (I would rather have said none, or no one, than neither, since the discourse is of more than two. I thought the meaning of uter and nevler had being agreed long ago,) " though we could suppose their union to make such a per- fect Being, because they are not the same, and (neither) no one of them is the whole," &c. This is the only thing that ever came under my notice among the school-men, that hath any appearing strength in it, against the hypothesis which I have proposed as possible for ought I knew. They generally dispute against many sorts of compositions in the being of God, which I am not concerned in: that of matter and form, which is alien from this affair; of quantitative parts, which is as alien: of subject and accident, which touches us not; of act and power, which doth it as little: each suhsistent, being eternally in utmost actuality. And by sundry sorts and methods of argument, whereof only this can seem to signify any thing against the present supposition. And it wholly resolves into the notion of infinity, about which I g^enerally spoke my sense in that first h Letter to Dr. "VVallis. And as I there intimated how much easier it is to puzzle another upon that subject than to satisfy oneself, so I here say, that I doubt not to give any man as much trouble about it in respect of quantitative extension, as he can me, in this. I think it demonstrable, that one Infinite can never be from another by voluntarv production, that ^t cannot by necessary emanation, I think not so. In the h Seo Calm Discourse. i Ibid. k Hi« Letter, p. 5. I Calm Disc, meantime, when we are told so plainlv bv the divine ora- cles, of a sacred three, that are each of' them God, and of some one whereof some things are spoken that are not nor can be of the others ; I think it easier to count three than to determme of mfiniteness : and accordingly to form one's belief But of this more when we come to compare him with himself ■ And for what he discourses of the aspect this supposition hath upon the Trinity, and the Homo- ousion ; it all proceeds still upon his own fiction of parts, and upon the invidious straining of thai similitude of the union of soul and body, as he himself doth tanhim non con- fess; except that he lessens it by saying most untruly (hat he (the inquirer") doth expressly own the consequence. Therefore if he do not own the consequence, then the de- fender confesses himself to have invidiously devised it. And what is it 1 That if all three by this composition are but one God, neither of them by himself is true and perfect God. The divinity is like the English ; biu both his own. The inquirer denies both antecedent (which he knows) and consequent too. Leave out, by this composition, (his own figinen!,) and his argument as much disproves any trinity at all as it doth the present hypothesis. But wherein doth the inquirer own it ? because such a similitude is used (as 'lis often in that discourse) of the union between soul and bod)', (declared elsewhere to be un- expresslj' defective,) that therefore the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are each of them by himself no more truly Lord or God, according to the Athanasian creed, or other- wise than in as improper a sense, as the body of a man, excluding the soul, is a man, or a human pei-son. Or as if Deity were no more i-n one of the persons, than huiiianity in a carcass ! Who that looks upon all this with equal eye-s, but will rather choose as doubtful a notion, than so ap- parently ill a spiiit7 Are similitudes ever wont to be alike throughout, to what they are brought to illusirate ? It might as well be said, becaiL<;e he mentions with appro- bation such as illustrate the doctrine of the trinity by a tree and its branches, that, therefore, there we are to expect leaves and blo.ssoms. Is it strange the -created universe should not afford us an exact representation of uncreated Being 1 How could he but think of that ; " To whom do ye liken mel" At least one would have thought he should not have forgot what he had so lately said himself k We must grant we have no perfect example of any a^ich union in nature. What appetite in him is it, that now seeks what nature doth not afford ? A very unnatural one, we mav conclude. 'Twere trifling to repeat what was said, and was so plain, before, that the union between soul and body was never brought to illustrate personal unioa but essential. The former is here imagined without pre- tence, there being no mention or occasion for the mention- ing of persons in the place he allege.--, i But to make out his violent consequence he foists in a supposition, that never came into any man's imagination but a Socinian's and his own : — ^(which I say, contradistinguishing him to them, that the matter may (a.s it ought) appear the more strange. •") If God be a person, he can be but one. Is God the appropriate name of a person? then indeed there will be but one person; but who here says so bin himself? The name of God is the name of the essence, not the distin- guishing name of a person. But if three intelligent natures be united in one Deiiy, each will be persons, and each will be God, and all will be one God ; not by parts, other than conceptible, undivided, and inseparable, as the soul and body of a man are not. Which sufhciently conserves the Christian trinity fiom such furious and impotent at- tacks as these. And the homo-ausiotcs is most entirely conserved too: for what are three spiritual natures no more the same, than (as he grossly speaks) the soul and bodv are ? no more than an intelligent mind, and a piece of clay 1 Bv M-hat consequence is this said, from any thing in the inquirer's hypothesis'? Whereas also he expressly insists, n that the Father, as Fons trinitatis. is first, the Son of the Father, the Holy Ghost from both. Is not the water in the streams the same that was in the fountain 1 and are not the ° several attributes eypressly spolcen of a.s common to these three"? Essential power, wisdom, goodness, (which are denied to be the p ecise notions of Father, Son. and Spirit,) said by more tha n a ^sfUKC^pian, as that may be m His Letter r V.i. I Olm Disr. o Ibid. 156 A LETTER TO A FRIEND understood to signify, mere presence, (how intimate soever,) but by real vital union, as much as each one's, as any one's? and all other conceivable perfections besides! Why were these words read with eyes refusing their office, to let them into the reader's mind 1 whence also how fabu- lous is the talk of p power begetting wisdom, &c. against what is so plainly saidi of the order of priority oxiA pos- teriority, &c. There had been some prudence seen in all this conduct, if the defender could have taken effectual care, that every thing should have been blotted out of all the copies of that discourse, but what he would have thought fit to be per- mitted to tlie view of other eyes than his own. For then, though in so gross prevarication he had not preserved his innocency, he might have saved in some degree his reputa- tion. Yet also he should have taken some heed that anger might not so have discoloured his eye, as to make so inju- dicious a choice what to confess and what to conceal. For had he not himself blabbed, that it was said, we are not under the precise notions of power, v.'isdom and goodness, to conceive of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost ; he might more plausibly have formed his odd births, and fathered them where he dolh. But wrath indulged will show its governing pow'er. And all this fury and vengeance (upon the inquirer, and the dean too) he reckoned was due, only because it was so presumptuously thought, that somewhat in his hypothesis (or which he defends) might have been better, and that he (probably) sees it might; so much a greater thing (in some ill fits) is the gratifying a humour than the Christian cause ! 2. But let us now see ho^v all this turns upon himself. And how directly his ill polished (not to say envenomed) darts, missing their designed mark, strike into that very breast which he undertakes to defend. Whereas there are two things, principally, to be designed in a discourse of this subject, viz. 1. The explaining the unity of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, so as that though they are some way three, they may yet be concluded to l>e in Godhead but one ; 2. The evincing, notwithstanding that unity, the possi- bility of their sutScient distinction, to admit the disti ict predicates fhat are severally spoken of them in the Holy Scriptures : The inquirer's discourse chiefly insists upon these two things. 1. That necessity of existence is the most fundamental attribute of Deity. And that therefore the Father, as the Fountain, being necessarily of himself, the Son necessarily of the father, the Holy Ghost necessarily from them both; each cannot but be God, and the same one'God. (In refer- ence to the former purpose.) 2. That absolute omnimodous simplicity, is never as- serted, in Scripture, of the Divine Being, nor capable of being, otherwise, demonstrated of it; and that it is impos- sible, either from Scripture, or rational evidence, accurately to assign the limits thereof, and determine what simplicity belongs to that ever blessed Being, and what not : if it be necessary to our apprehending liow such A^iinci predicates and attributions may severallj^ belong to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, that we conceive three distinct essences necessarily coexisting, in an eternal, vital, inseparable union in the Divine Being; the thing may be in itself pos- sible for ought we know. And this is propounded to serve the latter purpose. The defender of the dean seems to think otherwise of these two things, viz. of necessity of existence, common to the sacred three, which will prove each of them to be God, and, belonging to them in the mentioned order, as Father, Son, and Spirit, will prove them necessary to be one God. And of what is said of simplicity, which might admit their sufficient distinction ; of both these, I say, he seems to think otherwise by neglecting both, lest that discourse should be thought anyway pertinent, or useful to its end; and disputes vehemently against the latter. How strongly and successfully he does it, in respect of the truth of the thing, we have seen. But whether weakly or strongly, that his disputation tends to wound the dean's cause, all that it can, shall now be made appear. p Postscript to his Letter, p. Hi. r Ibid. q Calm Disc. It is notorious the dean hath asserted, so positively, three infinite Minds or Spirits, that the benign interpretation wherewith this defender would salve the matter, (a new vocabulary being to be made for him on purpose, and the reason of things quite altered,) will to any man of sense seem rather ludicrous, than sufficient, without express re- tractation. For which the inquirer thinks he is upon some- what better terms, than he, if there were occasion for it, both by the tenor of his whole discourse, and by what he hath particularly said' in the 28th sect. But after the interpretation offered, see whether such things are not said over and over in the defence, as make the defender (and the dean if he speak his sense) most obnoxious to the whole argumentation in the postscript. So as, if a part was acted, it was carried so untowardly, that it seemed to be quite forgotten what part it was, and all the blows (for it was come now to offending instead of defending) fall di- rectly upon him, whom the actor had undertaken to defend. It hath been noted already, that the defender says ex- pressly, « " the Divine nature is one individual nature," fand so says the inquirer, ') — but not one single nature ; (then it must be double and triple, not absolutely simple, as also the inquirer says;) to which he {viz. the defender) adds, " one single nature can be but one person, whether in God or man." Now let any man judge whether all his reasonings are not most directly applicable against him, (if they signify any thing,) which are contained in his post- script, p. 106, 107, 108, &c. How furiously doth he exagitate that saying, " " When you predicate Godhead, or the name of God, of any one of them, (viz. Father, Son, or Holy Ghost, ^ you herein express a true but inadequate conception of God," &c. insisting that the whole " undivided Divine nature" (no doubt it is ever- lastingly undivided wherever it is) "subsists entirely in three distinct persons." This the inquirer never denied, though he charges it upon him, that he makes no one of the persons to be^ true and perfect God. But how well doth that agree with what he had himself said, (Defence, p. 2(J.) Though God be the most absolute, complete, independent Being, 3'^et neither the Son, nor the Holy Ghost, can be said to be an absolute, complete, independent God. He falsely charges it upon the inquirer that he makes the per- sons severally not perfect God, and he denies two of them to be complete God. To say not perfect is criminal, (as indeed it is,) to say not complete is innocent ! But his saying the Son and Holy Ghost are not complete God ; how doth it consist with what is said. Postscript, p. 109. " The same whole entire divinity distinctly and insepara- bly subsists in the person of the Son and of the Holy Ghost." What is wanting to make him complete God, in whom " the whole, entire divinity subsists 1" No won- der if he quarrel with all the world who so little agrees with him whose defence he undertakes, or with himself. In the meantime the inquirer hath the less reason to com- plain, when he manifestly treats himself as ill as him. I only add, that for his Discourse concerning " the one Divinity, or one Divine Nature, subsisting wholly and en- tirely, three times," (whereas I had thought three persons had subsisted at all times, and all at once,) and the per- sons of the Son and Holy Spirit, not being emanations ; Not the Son, because he is the Father's image; and an image is not an emanation, but a reflection ; (but how should there be a reflected image without an emanation 7) "nor the Holy Ghost, being vpoffoXn, not in the sense of emanation, but of the mysteriotis procession ;" I shall make no guesses about it, (for it concerns not the inquirer,) only I think it very secure against the formidable objection which he mentions, p. 35. of its being too intelligible. Upon the whole matter, I see not what service it can do him, to put intelligent persons instead of mind; for I thought every person had been intelligent. Boethius his definition, which he alleges, plainly implies so much, and one would think he must know that it is the usual notion of a person to understand by it suppositvm roiionale or in- telligens. Therefore methinks he should not reckon it ne- cessary to distinguish persons (as he doth by this addition of intelligent) into such as are persons and such as are no persons. s Dpfence, p. IS. p. 18. u Post-script. t Calm Diacoune. vibid. CONCERNIXG THE POSTSCRIPT, &c. 157 But since he expressly says, (and I think for the most part trul}'',) " that *• ilie three persons or subsistences, in the ever blessed trinity, are three real, substantial subsistences, each of which hath entirely, all the perfections of the Di- vine nature, divine wisdom, power, and g;oodness ; and therefore each of them isciernal, infinite mind, as distinct from each othei as any other three persons ; and this he believes the Dean will no more recant, than he will re- nounce a trinity ; for all the wit of man cannot find a me- dium between a substantial trinity and a trinity of names, or a trinity of mere modes, respects, and relations in the same single essence, v/hich is no trinity at all." As also he had said much to the same purpose before, " that to talk of three subsistences in the abstract, without three that subsist, or of one single nature which hath three subsist- ences, when it's impossible that in singularify there can be more than one subsistence," &c. I believe he will find no small difficulty to name what it is, that with the peculiar distinct manner of subsistence makes a person ; not the very same common nature, for the persons cannot be dis- tinguished from each other by that which is common to them all. Therefore the divine nature which is common to the three, must according to him comprehend three single natures, and not be absolutely simple. Hither must be his resort at last, after all his earnest disputation against it. And these he will have to be parts, which because they are undivided, impartible, inseparable, everlastingly and necessarily united, I do reckon the inquirer did with very sutTicient reason, and with just decency, and doth still con- tinue very peremptorily to deny. And whereas he contends that the whole divine nature is entirely in each subsistence, (as he dees again and again,) I think the term whole improper, where there are no proper parts. And I doubt not, when he gives place to cooler thoughts, he will see cause to qualify that assertion For if he strictly mean that every thing that belongs to the Godhead is in each person ; I see not how he will fetch himself from the Socinian consequence, that then each person must have a trinity subsisting in it, and be Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. For I doubt not he will acknow- ledge that the entire divinity includes in it the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. And thei^efore he must be beholden to an inadequate notion in this very case, when all is done, how much soever he hath contended against it. I do how- ever think it safe and free from any other difficulty, that we unavoidably have in conceiving intiniies, to say. That all perfection is in each subsistent (which I like better than subsistence, as more expressive of the concrete) as far as their natural, necessary, eternal order, towards one an- other, as the first is the fountain or radix, the second from that, and the third from both, can possibly admit. All must be originally in the Father, with whom the other two have that intimate, vital, eternal union, that what is in him the other communicate tlierein, in as full perfection as is inconceivable, and more than it is possible for us or for any finite mind to conceive. Therefore since that differ- ence which only proceeds from that natural, eternal order, is conjecturable only, hut is reallv unknown, unrevealed, and inscrutable; it is better herein to confess the imper- fection of that knowledge which we have, than to boast that which we have not, or aspire to that which we cannot have. A VIEW OP THAT P.1RT OF THE LATE CONSIDERATIONS ADDRESSED TO R H. ABOUT THE TRINITY. WHICH COXCERNS THE SOBER INaUIRY ON THAT SUBJECT. IN A LETTER TO THE FORMER FRIEND. Yon see. Sir, I make no haste to tell you my thoughts of ■what hath been published since my last to you, again.st my sentiments touching the Holy Trinity. I saw the matter w Defence, p. 30. less required my lime and thoughts, than my other affairs ; and so little, that I was almost indifrerent wheiJKT I took any notice thereof or no. There is really noihing of argu- ment in what I have seen, but what I had suggested before, and objected to myself, in those very discourses of mine, now animadverted on ; which not having prevented, with me, the opinion I am of, can as litile alter it, and should as little any man's else. But a little leisure, as it can, without extortion, be gained from other occasions, I do not much grudge to bestow on this. I find my.self concerned in the late considerations on the explications of the doctrine of the trinity — in a letter to H. H. The author is pleased to give me the honour of a name, a lank, unvocal one. It is so contrived, that one may easily guess whom he means; but the rea.son of liis doing so i cannot guess; it is because he knew himself, what he would have others believe. But I suppose he as well knew his own name. If he knew not the former, he ran the hazard of injuring either the supposed author, or the true, or both. I could, 1 be- lieve, make as shrewd a guess at his name, and express it as plainly. But I think it not civil to do so; because I apprehend he hath some reason to conceal it, whereof I think he hath a right to be the judge. But I will not pre- scribe to him rules of civility, of which that he is a great judge, I will not allow myself to doubt. Yet I will not suppose him to have .^ ver\' diminishing thoughts of our Saviour, as not to acknowledge and rever- ence the authority of that great rule of his. which he knows gained reverence with some who called not themselves Christians, " Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you — &c." Nor can divine what greater reason he should have to hide his own name, than to expose mine, or make the person he indigitates be thought the author of the dis- course he intended to expose; since no man can imagine how, as the Christian world is constituted, any one can be more obnoxious for denying three persons, than for a^^sert- ing three Gods: which latter his impotent attempt aims to make that author do. For his censures of that author's style, and difficulty to be understood, the)' ofl'end me not. But so I have known some pretend deafness, to what they were unwilling to hear. There is indeed one place, Sobet Inquiry, in the end of sect. 8. where must should have been left out, upon the adding afterwards q{ can, that might gi^-e one some trou- ble. In which yet, the supposal of an (not unusual) asyn- deton, would, without the help of magic, have relieved a considering reader. And for his compliments, as they do me no real good, so, I thank God, they hurt me not. I dwell at home, and better know my own furniture than another can. For himself, I discern and readily aclcnow- ledge in him, those excellent accomjilishments, for which I most heartily wish him an advocate in a better cause, without despair he will yet prove so; when I take notice of some pa.ssages which look like indications of a serious temper of mind, as of choosing God, and the honour of his name, for our portion and design : and that he lives in vain, who knows not his Alaker, and his God : with the like. But on the other hand, I was as heartily sorry to meet with an expression of so different a strain, on so awful a subject, of " making a coat for the moon." That precept whiuh'' Josephus inserts among those given the Jews, doth for the reason it ha;h in it, abstracting from its au- thority, deserve to be considered. It seems to import a decency to the rest of mankind, whose notions of a Deity did not argue them sunk into the lowest degrees of sottish- ness and stupidity. Good Sir, what needed (think you) so adventurous boldness, in so lubricous a case 1 It gains nothing to a man's cause either of strength or reputation with Avise and good men. A sound argument will be as sound without it. Nor should I much value having them on my side, whom I can hope to make laugh at so hazard- ous a jest. I can never indeed have any irreat veneration for a morose sourness, whatsoever affected appearance it may have with it, of a simulated sanctimony or religious- ness; but I should think it no hardship upon me to re- press that levitj', as to attempt dancing upon the brink of so tremendous a precipice. And would always express a %\ao^t<.oi must not be so taken, as if it were to be torn away from its coherence, and from itself. When therefore he says the TO jiiv dylvvr)Tov, Kai ysi'i'ijrdi', Koi CxTropevrdv, the being unbc- gotlen, begotten, and having proceeded, are not the names of the essence, but (rpdiroi imdfi^twc,') modes of subsisteiwe ; he must mean they are not immediately names of the essence, but mediately they cannot but be so. For what do they modify 1 not nothing. When they are said to be modes of subsistence, what is it that subsists? We cannot pluck away these modes of subsistence from that which subsists, and whereof they are the modes. And what is thai 1 You will say the fiia aaia, the mie essence, which he had men- tioned before ; and that one essence is, 'lis true, as perfectly one as 'tis possible; for what is of itself, and Avhat are from that, to be with each other, i. e. that they are conge- nerous, as the sun and its rays, (according to that, Heb. i. 3. (i-ui.yaT/ia rijf <5i5|/)?, the effulgency of glory, ^ or as mind, and (where there is nothing else but substance) con.substantial thought or word. Therefore this oneness of essence must be taken in so large and extensive a sense, as that it may admit of these differences. For so he afterwards plainly speaks, if " h jiiv, ny€vvr]T<.>i e-^ci ; if the one (the Father) hath his existence without being begotten, 6 yei/unTUM, another (the Son) by being begotten, to M, iKjrif>£OTi: E .9. TTi-. ber of very pertinent and home quotations, hath proved that his explication (I mean that part of it which makes the three persons to be .so many distinct essences, or sub- stances) is the doctrine of the principal if not of all the fathers, as well a.s of the Platonisls." And 'tis added, " and I, for my part, do grant it." Upon the whole, then, I reckon that as to this first part, we stand clear not only to the rest of the world, but with this author himself, that to be a real trinitarian is not so unheard of a thing, or what no learned divine of any persuasion ever dreamt of before the inquirer. But now for the Second part. The delicious society supposed to be be- tween (or rather among) the three persons. Is this a dream? and so strange a onel Why, good Sir ! can you suppose three persons, i. e. three intellectual subsistences, perfectly wise, holy, and good, coexisting with, inexisting in, one another to have no society'? or that socieiy not to be delicious"? He say.?. How can it be 1 I say. How can it but bel Herein I am sure the inquirer hath far more company than in the former. For whether the three per- sons have all the same numerical essence, or three distinct, all agree they most delightfully converse. Will he pre- tend never to have read any that make love (as it were in tercurrent between the two first) the character of the third 1 In short, is it the thing he quarrels with as singular, or the word ? At the thing, supposing three persons, he can have no quarrel, without quarrelling with the common sense of mankind. For the word, he hath more wit and knowledge of language than to pretend to find fault with that. For let him consult expositors (even the known cri- tics) upon the mentioned place, Prov. viii. (whom, in so plain a case, I will not be at the pains to quote and tran- scribe,) and take notice whether none read those words fui in deliciis. Therefore I believe the considerator will be so ingenuous, as to perceive he hath, in this part of his discourse, grossly overshot, or undershot, or shot wide of, his own mark, if indeed he had any, or did not (letting his bolt fly too soon) shoot at rovers, before he had taken steady aim at any thing. In short, all this dust could be raised but with design only, because he could not enlight- en his readers, lo blind them. But now, when he should come by solid argument to disprove the hypothesis, by showing that three individual divine natures, or essences, can possibly have no nexus, so as to become one entire divine nature, and, at the same time, (which this hypothesis supposes,) remain still three individual divine natures and essences, he thinks fit to leave it to another to do it for him, who, he sa\'s, if he cannot prove this, can prove nothing. And when we see that proof, it will be time enough to consider it. In the meantime, I cannot here but note what I will neither, in charity, call forgery in the considerator, nor, in civility, ignorance, but it cannot be less than great over- sight; hist&\koi thesethree,^oumiedasXo bec^/me o-ne. The inquirer never spake (nor dreamt) of their becoming one, but of their being naturally, necessarily, and eternaHy so. Then he comes to put the question, as (he says) it is between the inquirer and the Socinians. And he puts it thus : How three distinct, several, individual divine beings, essences, or substances, should remain three several indi- vidual sub.stances, and yet, at the same time, be united into one divine substance called God 1 One would have thought, when he had so newly waived the former ques- tion, as wherein he meant not to be concerned, he should presently have put a new one, upon which he intended to engage himself But we have the same over again, even with the same ill look of an equivalent phrase unto becom- ing united into one, to insinuate to his reader, as if his an- tagonist thought these three were dc novo united, not in but into one. Which he knew must have a harsh sound, and as well knew it to be most repugnant to the inquirer's most declared sentiment. Nor will it be any presumption, if I take the liberty to set down the question according to the inquirer's mind, who hath as much reason to know it as he; and I am sure it will be more agreeable to the tenor of his discourse now referred to, " Whether the TO Otiov, or the Divine Being, may not possibly, for ought we know, contain three natures, or essences, under the names of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, so far distinct, as ICO A VIEW OF THE LATE CONSIDERATIONS is necessary to found the distinct predications or attributes severally given them in the Holy Scriptures, and yet be eternally, necessarily, naturally, vitally so united, as not- withstanding that remaining distinction, to be one God." And let us now see what he hath to say, first, to the in- quirer's illustrations of it, as possible: secondly^ what he brings to prove it impossible. As to the former part, he first falls upon what the in- quirer hath said concerning the vegetative, sensitive, and intellective natures in oursej ves. And upon this he insists so operously, as if the whole weight of the cause had been laid upon it, and seems to think the inquirer had forgot the question, when he mentioned it; because he says, those are only distinct faculties, not persons, or substances, (though persons were not in his question,) without ever taking any notice of the inquirer's waiving it, with these words, " that he would content himself with what was more obvious." But this is all art: to raise a mighty posse, and labour to seem to those that he believed would read what he writ only, not what the other did, most effec- tually to expunge what he saw was neglected, though not altogether useless ; as we shall see anon. In the meantime, it is observable how needlessly he slurs himself in this his first brisk onset. He says, " No man ever pretended — that the vegetative, sensitive, and intel- lective faculties (or powers) are so many distinct, indi- vidual persons, substances, or essences, we grant," &c. What, did no man ever pretend that these three distinct natures, the vegetative, sensitive, intellective, were in man, three distinct substances, or souls, concurring by a certain subordination in him"? What necessity was there, that to heighten his triumph, in the opinion of his credulous fol- lowers, he should, with so glorious a confidence, put on the vain and false show of having all the world on his side ; and herein either dissemble his knowledge, or grossly be- wray his ignorance in the mere history of philosophy ; and most imprudently suppose all his readers as ignorant, as he would seem 1 ' What, did he never hear of an Averroes in the world 1 Doth he not know that physician and phi- losopher, and his followers, earnestly contended for what he says no man ever pretended to? Or that divers other commentators upon Aristotle, have some abetted, others as vehemently opposed, them in it 1 Not to insist also that some thought the Intelledus Agens, and Palicns, to be dis- tinct substances, belonging to the nature of man, as others had also other conceits about the former 1 And if he look some hundreds of years back, as far as the time and extant work of Nemesius, bishop and philosopher, (as he writes himself,) of the nature of man, (who lived in the time of Gregory Nazianzen, as appears by an epistle of his writ to him, and prefixed to that little book of his,) he will find that author takes notice there were divers that took man to consist of mind, soul, and body, and that some did doubt <= ■whether tke mind supervening to the sovi as one to the other, did not make the latter intelligent. And in several other parts of that work, easy, if it were necessary, to be recited, he speaks it as the judgment of some,^ that the nnreason- ahle nature in man did exist by itself, as being of itself om unreasonaile soul, not a part of the reasonable ;^ accounting it one of the greatest absurdities, that the unreasonable soul should be a part of that which is reasonable. And he carries us yet much further back, referring us to f Plotinus, in whom any that will, may read much more to that purpose in many places. It matters not whether this opinion be true or false, but a great mistake (or misrepre- sentation) it was, to say no man ever pretended to it. And be that as it will; if all the readers will suspend their judgments, that a trinity in the Godhead is impossible, till the considerator shall have proved, by plain demonstra- tion, the concurrence of three such spirits (a vegetative, sensitive, and intellective) vitally united in the constitution of man, is a thing simply impossible, I believe he will not, in haste, have many proselytes. I, for my part, as his own eyes might have told him, laid no stress upon it; but only mentioned it in transitu, as I was going on to what is obvious, and in view to every man, the union between our soul and body. Nor was I solicitous to find this an exact parallel, as he fancies I c TioTipnv Trponc\Ot,>v, o vovi Tt\ l/^ii,\fj (0{ aXXoj aWt] vocpav avrriv sirotriocv, &c cap. I. was obliged to do. What if there be no exact parallell Will any man of a sober mind, or that is master of his oivn thoughts, conclude every thing impossible in the un- created Being, whereof there is not an exact parallel in the creation'! If any man will stand upon this, come make an argument of it, let us .see it in form, and try its stren.gth. — Whatsoever hath not its exact parallel in ihe creation, is impossible in God, &c. — He will sooner piove himself ridiculous, than prove his point by such a medium. 'Tis enough for a sober man's purpose, in such a case as we are now considering, if we iiud such things actually are (or might as easily be, as what we see actually is) among the creatures, that are of as difficult conception, and explication, as what appears represented in the in- quirer's hypothesis concerning a trinity. 'Tis trifling to atcempt to give, or to ask, a parallel exact per omnia. It abundantly serves any reasonable purpose, if there be a parallel quoad hoc, viz. in respect of the facilit}- or difii- culiy of conception. And though the vegeiaiive, sensi- tive, and intellective natures be not so many distinct sub- stances, a trinity is not less conceivable in the Divine Being, than three such natures, or natural powers, in the one hu- man nature. And whoever they be that will not simplify the Divine Being into nothing, (as the excellent author of the 28 pro- positions speaks,) must also acknowledge the mo.'st real perfections in the Divine Being, though not univocal, but infinitely transcendent to any thing in us. And are they no way distinct ? Let any sober understanding judge, will the same nothing agree to them alll Is his know- ledge, throughout, the same with his effective power 1 Then he must make himself. For who can doubt he knows himself? And is his will the self-same untlisiinguishalile perfection, in him, with his knowledge 1 Then the pur- poses of his will must be to effect all that he can. For doth he not know all that he can do? And the complacencies of his will must be as much in what is evil, as good, even in the most odious turpitude of the vilest, and most im- moral evils! For he knows both alike. I know what is commonly said of extrinsical denominations : but are such denominations true, or false 1 Have they any thing in re correspondent to them, or have they not 1 Then .some dis- tinction there must be of these perfections themselves. If so, how are they distinguished! And there appears great reason, from God's own word, to conceive greater distinction of the three hypostases in his being, than of the attributes which are common to them, as is said. Sober Inquiry, page 151. In reference whereto, it is not improper or impertinent to mention such diflferences, as we find in our own being, though they be not distinct substances. Less distinction in ourselves may lead us to conceive the possibility of greater in him in whom we are wont to apprehend nothing but substarce. What he adds concerning the union of soul and budy in ourselves, (which he cannot deny to be distinct substances,) is, from a man of so good sense, so surprisingly strange, and remote from the purpose, that one would scarce think it from the same man ; but that he left this part to some other of the club, and afterwards v/rote on, himself, with- out reading it over ; or this was with him (what we are all liable to) some drowsy interval. For when he had himself recited as the inquirer's words, or sense, " If there be this union between two so contrary natures and substances, as the soul and bod}', why may there not be a like union between two or three created spirits'?" he, without shadow^ of a pretence, feigns the in- quirer again to have forgot the question, because soul and body are not both intelligent substances. And why. Sir, doth this argiie him to have forgot the question 1 'Tis as if he expected a man to be at the top of the stairs, as soon as he touched the first step. In a series of discourse, mtist the beginning touch the end, leaving out what is to come between, and connect both parts'? What then serve me- diums for'? And so farewell to all reasonings, since no- thing can be proved by itself He expected, it seems, I should have proved " three intelligent natures might be united, because three intelligent natures might be united." But say I (and so he repeats) if there be so near union (\ Ka9' cavrr/v eivai (Oi Xo}oi/ \pvxif. e T<'Ji' aroiroraTWi', cap. 16. f Enn. 6. lib. 7. cap. 5, 8, 7, &c. ADDRESSED TO II. H. ABOUT THE TRINITY. 161 oetween things of so contrarj' natures as soul and body, why not between two or three created spirits 1 The ques- tion is, as he now stales it himself, why may not three intelligent substances be united 1 And hither he (with jialpable violence) immediately refers, the mention of the union of soul and body; and, says he, "Why, Sir, are body and soul intelligent substances!" And, say I, But why. Sir, are not the three (supposed) created spiiits in- telligent substances 1 And now, thinKs he, will my easy admiring readers, tJiat read me only, and not him, say, What a baffle hath he given the inquirer ! What an igno- rant man is this Mr. , to talk of soul and body, as both intelligent substances! But if any of them happen upon the inquirer's book too, thei; must ihey say, How scurvily doth this matter turn upon himself! how inconsiderate a prevaricator was he that took upon him the present part of a considerer, so to represent him ! And I myself would say, had I the opportunity of free discourse with him in a corner, (which because I have not, I say it here,) Sir, is this sincere writing 1 Is this the way to sift out truth 1 And I niust further say, this looks like a man stung by the pungency of the present question. " If soul and body, things of so contrar)- natures, that is, of an intelligent and unintelligent nature, can be united into one (human) na- ture, why may not three created spirits, all intelligent na- tures, be as well united into some one thing 1 It appears you knew not what to say to it ; and would fain seem to say something, when you really had nothing to say, and therefore so egregiously tergiversate, and feign yourself not to understand it, or that your antagonist did not under- stand himself. The inquirer's scope was manifest. No- thing was to be got by so grossly perverting it. Is there no argument but a pari? Might you not plainly see, he here argued a fortiori ? If contrary natures niight be so united, why not much rather like natures 1 When 3'ou ask me this question, " Do not bod}'' and soul remain two sulstances, a bodily and a spiritual, not- withstanding their concurrence to the constitution of a manl" I answer, Yes. And I thank you. Sir, for this kind look towards my hypothesis. If thej' were not so, the mention of this union had no way served it. You know 'tis only union, with continuing distinction, that is for m}' purpose. I doubt you nodded a little, when you asked me that question ; and I do annuere. But when the discourse was only of a natural union, what, in the name of wonder, made you dream of a Christ- mas-pie 1 Had you writ it at the same time of 3'ear I am now writing, I should have wondered less. Btit either you had some particular, preternatural appetite to that sort of delicate; or you gave your fancy a random liberty, to make your pen write whatever came to your fingers' end, and that whirled you unaware into a pastry, and so, by mere chance, you came to have 3^our finger in the pie. Or you thought to try whether this wild ramble might not issue as luckily for you, as Dr. Echard's jargon of words for- tuitously put together (to ridicule Hobbes's fatal chain of thoughts) at length ending in a napkin ; which was mighti- ly for your turn, in your present case. But upon the wliole matter, when you let your mind so unwarily be in palinis, your cookery quite spoiled j'our philosophy. Otherwise, when j'ou had newly read those words in the Sober Inquiry, as I find you had, page 138. " Waiving the many artificial unions of distinct things, that united, and coniinuingdistinct, make one thing under one name, I shall only consider what is natural," you would never let it (3'our mind, I mean so fine a thing) be huddled up, and sopped, with meat, plums, sugar, wine, in a Christmas-pie ; or have thought that the union of a human soul with a human bod}' was like such a jumble as this. I believe when some among the ancients made use of this union of soul and body, (as I find the}' have,) to represent a very sacred, viz. the h3'postatical one, they little thought it would be so debased ; or that any thing would be said of it so extravagant as this. And, if we design doing any body good by writing, let us give over this way of talk, lest people think, what I remember Cicero once said of the Epicureans arguing, that they do not .so much consider, as sortiri, cast lota what to sav. But now 'tis like we may come to some closer discourse. V/e see what is said to the inquirer's elucidation of his h}-pothesi> to represent it possible, which b3' mere oversight and incogitance (as I hope now appears) was too hastily pronounced an over- sight, or incogitancy. 2. We are next to consider what he says to prove it im- possible. And so far as I can apprehend the drift of ihe discourse, what he alleges will be reduced to these two heads of argument, viz. — that three such hypostases (or stibsisients, as I have chosen to call them) can have no possible nexus, by which to be one God: (1.) Because they are all suppo.sed intelligent: (2.) Because they can neither be said to be finite, nor infinite. He should not therefore have said the hypothesis was mere incogitance and oversight ; for he knows 1 saw, and considered them both; (in the Sober Inquiry itself: the former, page 138, the latter, page 143, with page 149,) and thought them un- concluding then, as I still think. Nor do 1 find the con- siderer hath now added any strength to either of them. But I .shall, since he is importune, go to the reconsidera- tion of them with him. And, (1.) As to the former, I cannot so much as imagine what should make him, confessing (which he could not help) the actual union of an intelligent and unintelligent being, deny the possible union of intelligent beings. He seems to apprehend many dangeious things in it, that if he can- not reason he may fright, a man out of it, and out of his wits too. It ■will infer associating, discoursing, solacing. But where lies the danger of ail this 1 or to whom is it dangerous? He says it introduces three omniscient, al- mighty Beings, as I expressly call them, associating, &c. But he cites no place where, and I challenge him to name any persons among whom, I so expressly called them. He may indeed tell wheie I blamed him for representing some of his adversaries, as afiirming three Almighties, and de- nying more than one; but that is not expressly calling them so myself And he ma}- know in time 'tis one thing expressly to call them so, and another to put him (as he is concerned) to disprove it. Aye, but it will further infer tritheism. It will make three Gods. And if this be not to make three Gods, it can never be made appear that the pagans held moie gods. Yes, if there be no natural, vital ncxvs, if they be united in one, of which the pagans never talked : or, if they be co- ordinate, not subordinate, as Dr. Cudworth .speaks. And I add, if that subordination be, not arbitrary, but by neces- sary, natural, continual emanation of the second from the first, and of the third from both the other ; so as that their goings forth may be truly from everlasting, as is said of the one, and may as well be conceived of another of them. I would have the trinitarians be content with tlie re- proach of falling in, quoad hoc, with Plato; and not en^y their antagonists the honour of more closely following Mahomet. And, Sir, there is more paganism in denying this, and the divine revelation upon which it is grounded, than in supposing it. No. But there can be no such «i».r«5. Conversation, con- .sociation, mutual harmony, agreement, and delectation — cannot be conceived, but between beings so distinct and diverse, that they can be one in no natural respect, but only in a civil, or economical. This is loud, and earnest. But why can there nof? Setting aside noise and clamour, I want to know a reason, why intelligent beings may not be as intimately and naturally united with one another, as unintelligent and intelligent! and if so, why such union should spoil mutual conversation and delight 1 Perhaps his mind and mine might not do well together ; for he can- not conceive, and I, for my part, cannot but conceive, that most perfect intelligent natures, vitally united, must have the most delightful conversation, harmony, and agreement together ; and so much the more, by how much the more perfect they are, and by how much more perfect their union is. Whereas then I expect a reason, why intelligent beings cannot be capable of natural union, and no other is given me, but because they are intelligent. And again, why such beings naturally united cannot converse, and no other is given me, but because they are naturally united, ?". e. such things cannot be, because they cannot be. By 1 ow much the less such reasons have to convince, they have the more to confirm me, that the hypothesis I have proposed is ncl IbS A VIEW OF THE LATE CONSIDERATIONS capable of being disproved. And for my increased con- fidence I must profess myself so far beholden to the con- siderator. This, in the mean time, I do here declare, that I see not so much as the shadow of a reason from him, why three spiritual or intelligent beings cannot be natvirally and vitally united with each other, with continuing distinction, so as "to be really and truly one thing. If they cannot, 1 would know why 1 i. e. Why they cannot as well, or much rather than the soul and body, so as to be one entire man. If they can, such a created union is acknowledged pos- sible; which is all that part of our discourse contends for. And 'tis enough for our present purpose; for this will be a union of o^ooiitna, i. e. of things of the same nature, the soul and body are hepovaia, i. e. things of very different natures. And it sufficiently prepared our way, as was in- tended, to advance further, and add. That if such a created or made union be possible, it cannot be understood why a like uncreated or unmade union should be thought impossible. And if it be possible, the noisy clamour, that a trinity in the Godhead is impossible, or that it will infer tritheism, must cease, and be hushed into everlasting silence. Or if it shall still be resolved to be kept up, to carry on the begun humour, can only serve to fright children, or un- thinking people ; but can never be made articulate enough, to have any signification with men of sense. For when the Father is acknowledged on all hands to be the original, or fountain-being, existing necessarily and eternally of him- self ; the Son existing by eternal promanation necessarily of, and from, and in the Father ; the Holy Ghost of and in them both ; these, because they all exist necessarily, cannot but be each of them God, and, because they exist in necessary, natural, eternal union, cannot but be one God. And he that shall attempt to make tritheism of this, will sooner prove himself not a third part of a wise man, than from hence prove three Gods. We may truly and fitly say, the Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Ghost is God; but that form of speech, the Father is a God, the Son is a God, the Holy Ghost is a God, I think unjusti- fiable. The former way of speaking well agrees with the hotiiu-ou.notes of the Deity, the substance whereof is con- generous. You may fitly say of three drops of the same water, they are each of ihem water. But if 3'ou should say they are each of them a water, one would understand you to mean they were all drops of so many dilferent sorts of water. I do upon the whole judge the substance or essence of the three hypostases, to be as perfectly one, as can possibly consist with the emanation of some from other of them. But now next, (2.) In his way to his second topic of argumentation, he is guilty of a strange sort of omission, i. e. he twice over says he will omit, what he greatly insists upon, as a mighty matter, that this (meaning the inquirer's hypothesis) is heresy among those of his own party, whether they be the nominal or the real trinitarians; who all agree, that each of the divine persons is perfect God, in the most adequate and perfect sense ; and this too, as such person is con- sidered sejunctly, or, as the Athanasian creed speaks, by himself, &c. To this I only say, in the first place, that if this weigh any thing, it ought in reason to be as heavy upon him, as me; for I believe the same people that will call this ac- count of the trinity heresy, will call his denial of it heresy much more. But if he be not concerned at that, I am the more obliged to him, that he hath a kinder concern for me than himself And if he really have, let it ease his mind to know, that let the opinion be heresy never so much, I, for my part, am however resolved to be no heretic, as he and they may well enough see, by the whole tenor of that discourse. But yet I humbly crave leave to differ from him in this, as well as in greater matters. I am apt enough, indeed, to think that the nominal trinitarians will judge the opinion of the real trinitarians to want truth; and the real will, perhaps, more truly judge theirsio want sense. But neither the one nor the other will say that each of the divine per- sons is perfect God, in the most adequate and perfect g Ciiispsliones aliie. sense. For both cannot but agree that God, in the most adequate and perfect sense, includes Father, Son, and Holy Ghost ; but they will none of them say that each, or any, of the persons is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. And I am very confident, he that shall so represent them, will betray them by it into such inconveniences, and so much against their mind and intent, that if ever they did trust him as I believe they never did this considerator, to ex- press their sense for them, they never will do it more. As for Athanasius himself, whose creed he mentions, though he often speaks of an equality of the persons in point of Godhead : (tom. 2. p. 576.) yet he most expressly excepts the differences (which I take to be very important) of being unbegotten, begotten, and proceeding. And, which is a difference with a witness, in his questions and answers, he asks, "How many causes are there in God 1" (p. 11. TTdaa diria,) and answers, " one only, and that is the Father." And then asks, (CL. 12. vdaa dinuTa) " How many effects, or things caused 1" And answers, " two, the Son and the Spirit." , And adds, •' the Father is called a cause, because he begets the Son, and sends out the Spirit; the Son and Spirit are said to be caused, because the Sou is begotten, and doth not beget; the Spirit is sent forth, and doth not send." Now can he be thought all this while to mean an absolute equality 1 And whereas he uses the term inwaSiKois, which our author renders sejimdhj, or by himself, that he may make it seem opposite to what is said by the inquirer, page 156. I, for my part, say, as Athanasius doth, that each of the.se persons is nova6tKO!i, singly God, and Lord ; but I say not, as he doth not, (and he denies what the Sober Inquiry denies, in the mentioned place,) " that any one of the persons sejunctly, is all that is signified by the name of God ;" which words this author slily leaves out, for what purpose he best knows. But liis ])urpose, be it what it will, can no longer be served by it, than till the reader shall lake the pains to cast back his eye upon the Sober Inquiry, vide page 141. And I must here put the considerator in mind of what I will not sup- pose him ignorant, but inadvertent only, at this time; That one may be sejoined or abstracted from another two ways, or by a twofold abstraction, precisive or negative : that we may truly say of the Father, Son, or Holy Ghost, that the one of them is or is not God, abstracting from both the other, accordingly as you differently abstract. If you abstract any one of the persons from both the other by precisive abstraction, and each of them is God or Lord, jinmiiKioi or Singly considered ; but if by negative abstrac- tion, you sever any one from the other, so as to say the one is God, and not the other, or any one is all that is signified by the name of God, I deny it, as before I did; for so you would exclude the other two the Godhead ; which is but what was expressly enough said. Sober In- quiry, page 141. The Father is God, but not excluding the Son and the Holy Ghost; the Son is God, but not excluding — &c. And if (as this author quotes) we are compelled by the Christian verity so to speak, I wonder it should not com- pel him, as it is Christian verity, or at least as it is verit}^ as well as the rest of Christians, or mankind. Why hath he only the privilege of exemption from being compelled by truth 1 Athanasius's word is hvayKa^iiinBa. we are ne- cessitated ; and if the considerator's own translation grieve him, he might relieve himself by considering that all ne- cessity is not compulsive. And because he hath brought me to Athanasius, I shall take the occasion to say, I can- not apprehend him to have any sentiment contrary to this hypothesis. His business was against the Arians, or the Ariomanites (as he often called them, as symbolizing al.so with Manes.) And because Avith them the controversy was, " whether the Son and Spirit were creatures'?" m opposition hereto he constantly as.serts their consubstan- tialitjr with the Father, never intending (for aught that appears) that their being was numerically the same with his ; but of the same kind, uncreated, coessential, coeternal with his own. For so he expressly speaks in his ' other or additional questions, i. e. asking (quest. 6.) " How many essences ndrra? ovfria?, i. c. how many sorts of essence (as the answer will direct us to rmderstnnd it) do you acknowledge in God V ADDRESSED TO H. H. ABOUT THE TRINITY. 163 The answer is, I say, "one essence, one nature, one form," (iiopfhi',) and adds, " one kind," (rV ytw?,) which sufficiently expounds all the rest. He acknowledged no ditferent kinds of essence or nature in the Godhead, but that one only, which was eternal and uncreated ; ai,'reea- blv to what he elsewhere saysh against the followers of Sabellius. " 'Tis impossible things not eternal beings, not partaking Godhead, should be ranked or put in the same order with the Godhead." Afterwards speaking of the Father and the Son, he says, T, when by the latter, in that case, he must mean the same thing as by the former 1 In the forecited questions, he expressl}" says we were to acknowledge in the Deity rpm arojia, three individuals. Answ'jr to question 7. nbi prius. And elsewhere he as distinctly asserts rpia npayfiara, three things. And what could he mean by three things, not three deities, (as he often inculcates,) but he must certainly mean three enti- ties, three essences ; for by three things, he could not pos- sibly mean three non-entities, or three nothings. His great care plainly was to assert the true Deity of the Son and Spirit, or their pre-eternity, or that it could never be said {nv ore o,v jji) there was a time when they were not, which he inculcates in a hundred places, still insisting that one deity, one essence was common to them, but still ■with distinction; andas warmly inveighs against Sabellius and P. Samosatensis, as against Arius, eveiy whit. And that which puts his meaning quite out of doubt, k speaking how the Father, Son, and Spirit, though of one and the same sort of essence, are three hypostases, he plainly says the nature wherein they partake is so one, as the hu- man nature is one in all men. We men, saith he, consist- ing of a body and a soul, are all ^lu? fiatoi, *-ui oiaiac,, of one nature and substance, or essence ; but we are many hy- postases. And to the same purpose (Dial. 2. de Trinitate) his anovueos comparing the Father, Son, and Spirit, to a bishop, presbyter, and deacon, he brings in the orthodox saying, they have all the same nature, being each of them man ; as an angel, a man, and a horse, have different na- tures. In the mean time, because men are not inseparably and vitally united with one another, as the Divine Persons are, and cannot but be, by reason of the necessary, eternal, per- petual emanation of the two latter from the first, they can- not admit to be called one man, as the three persons in the Godhead are, and cannot but be one God. Insomuch a.s these three Divine Persons partake real Godhead (as ex- isting necessarily each of them) they are each truly God ; but because they partake it in necessary, eternal, vital union ; and so that the first is the radix, the second perpe- tually springing from the first, and the third from both the other, the)' are therefore together one God as branches, though really distinct from each other, and the root, are altogether notwithstanding but one tree, and all hfimoousial, or cnnsnbstajttial to one another : which is an illustration familiar with the ancients. And if there be any, now-a-days, that will call this heresy, (though as I said, I will be no he- retic however,) yet if I must make a choice, I had rather be a heretic with the Ante-Nicene and Nicene fathers, and Post Nicene, for ought appears to the contrary, through some following centuries, than be reputed orthodox with P. Lombard, &c. whom a German divine, not of meanest account, calls "one of the four evangelists of antichrist." But having now done with what he said he would omit, but did not, (though he might to every whit as good pur- pose,) we come to what he overlooks not, because (he inti- mates) he cannot. And let us see whether he looks into it, to any better purpose than if he had quite overlooked it. He is indeed the more excusable that he overlooks it not, h Contra .Sahellii Gregatcs. i EkC -ni-. Tom \ ?'. ^-ll. EMit Paris. k. Tractat. de Defiiiitionibus, Tom. 2. 43. ubi. vid. plura. because (he says) he could not. In tliat ca.se there is no remedy. Nor do I see how he well could, when the sober inquirer had once and again so directly put it in his view, and, as was said, objected it to himself. But he thinks, however, to make an irrefragable battering ram of it, wherewith to shiver this doctrine of the trinity all to pieces ; and he brings it into play with the two horns before mentioned. The Father, he says, for instance, is either infinite in his substance, his wisdom, his power, his good- ness, or he is not. With the like pompous apparatus, and even in the same terms, i 1 find a series of argumentatioc is by a noted sceptic adorned, and set forth against the be- ing, of any God at all. If there be any Divine Being, 'tis either finite or infinite, tfc. And he reasons upon each head, as the matter could admit, and probably thought as well of the performance as our author doth of his. But let us see how much to the purpose our author uses it in the present case. The inquirer had represented»»hree really distinct subsistents in the Godhead as po.ssible, for ought we know, not presuming to determine herein, this way or that, beyond what is plain in itself, or plainly re- vealed. And so still he thinks it may be, for ought he knows ; for he professes not to know any thing to the contrary. Yes, saith the considerator, but I do. No doubt, if any man. But say I, How know you 1 I know, saith he, they can neither be finite nor infinite, therefore there can bo no such thing at all. But, say I, do you know wliat infinite is, or can you comprehend it 1 ™ Yes, very well, says he, for I have an infinite, all-comprehending mind. What a cy- clopic understanding is this! Nay, and he pretends he can comprehend the very being of God (otherwise all re- ligion must cease) after he had granted, "we (including himself) cannot comprehend the least spire of grass." And yet that being of God is nothing el.'-e with him, but existence, {i.e. not to be nothing,) which he there vafrous- ly inserts, but very imprudently ; for every one sees he said it only to avoid the purpose he was to speak to, and so said it not to any present good purpose at all ; as if it had been the bishop's word, and all one with God's being. 'Tis true that his being includes his existeijce: but hath he therefore a clear, distinct, and adequate conception what God is, because he, indistinctly, conceives a being, vulgar- ly signified by the name of God, doth exist 1 Bring the matter to creatures, and because he knows, as he may by the sight of his eye, that such a creature exists, doth he therefore understand its nature 1 Existence is to be extra causas, and this is common to all creatures; as to be ne- cessarily, and without a cause, is peculiar to God. If therefore exi.stence and their beingbe all one, all creatures are the same, and differ not from one another ; for to be extra causas is that wherein they all agree. And extend it further, as existence is to be, mrervm natvra, abstract- ing from being caused, oruncaused ; and so God and crea- tures will be all one. And see whether this will not make all religion cease too % But if he say, though existence abstractly taken distin- guishes not God from creatures; yet his existence doth distinguish him. Very true ; but that leads us hack to the consideration of his being, of what sort that is. Which, therefore, if he had pleased, he might as well have let stand before as it was; and might have considered that existence, and that which doth exist, are not of the same import. Or that it is not all one, to say that God doth ex- ist, and what he is that doth exist. But it will be worth the while to examine alittle further this author's comprehension of infinites. He says it is to have a clear, distinct, and adequate conception of them; so he comprehends the infinite attributes of God. His eternity, i- e. that duration by which he is without all be- ginning and end. This tells us what it is not. But doth it tell us what it is? q. d. An infinite duration is a bound- less duration: a grammatical definition! or rather a mere translation of Latin into English. And so he might teach a mere Latinisi what boundless is, by turning the English back again into Latin. And greatly hath he edified his disciple ! As much as he should, without such change of language, by saying invasion is invasion. And doth he 1 £1 eart ri Ori-^i; 77701 -KnTepaaftevov ij airetpov, &c. Sext. Empir. advereua Matlinnialiro.5, I.il>. S. ra Considerations on the Lord Bishop of Worcester's Scnnon, p. 7, 8. 164 A VIEW OF THE LATE CONSIDERATIONS. give any better account of infinite wisdom and power 1 Are his conceptions of them clear and distinct 1 'Tis pos- sible to know much, and not be very wise. I do not think that therefore, which he gives, a very good account of wisdom. Again, knowing is doing somewhat. He speaks not now of making this or that, but more generally of do- ing any thing. Nor doth any one know any thing, but what he can know. Therefore his wisdom is power ; for so is an ability to know, power, as truly as an ability to do any thing else. Here is confusion, therefore, instead of distinction. And to the comprehending any thing, I should think it as requisite a man's conception be true as distinct. Now when he pretends to have distmct concep- tions of God's infinite wisdom and power, and if also his conceptions be true, those infinite attributes aie distinct. I am sure he comprehends them not, if, whereas, he clear- ly conceives them distinct, they are not so. But if they are dfetinct, they are distinct, what 1 Substances'? or ac- cidents 1 If the former, according to him, distinct divine substances must be distinct Gods. If the latter, let him weather the difliculties as he can of admitting accidents in the Divine Being. Either way, he must as little pre- tend to believe an omnimodous simplicity there, as the in- quirer. But would he then have him give better and ful- ler conceptions of these infinite attributes, or rather of the infinity of them, which is his present business"? No, no, tliat is none of the inquirer's part. He pretends not to comprehend infiniteness. 'Tis enough for o7j,e, among mor- tals, to offer at that ingcns ausum, so great a thing ! When again he says his conception of the infinite di- vine wisdom, power, &c. is adequate, telling us they are those properties whereby God knows, and can do, whatso- ver implies not a contradiction to be known, and done. I ask, but doth he comprehend in his mind all those things which it implies not a contradiction for him to know and do ! If not, what is become of his adequate conception 1 He may so comprehend all that the most learned book contains, because he knows the title, or something of its cover; and he hath a very adequate conception of all that is contained in the universe, because he has some general notion of what is signified by the word world. Let him then pretend as long as he please to comprehend infinite- ness, no sober man will believe him, and the less because he pretends it. If he put his mind upon the trial, and deal justly and truly when he hath tried, I would ask him, let him put the notion of infiniteness upon what he pleases, space, for instance, whether, as he thinks away any what- soever bounds of it, new ones do not immediately succeed ; and let him think away those, whetlier still he doth not presently conceive new 1 Yes, but he can divert and think no more of it, i. e. he can think what infinite is, by not thinking! And yet, if he did understand infinites never so well, it would be no small spite to him if a man did but assert the infiniteness of one of the persons, (the Father,) and only iT^yf'" as to the other two, as knowing their inti- mate union with him, makes his wisdom, power, &c. as truly theirs, as if it first resided in themselves; his argu- ment is quite undone by it to all intents and purposes. But I shall, however, further state and weigh this case of— knowing, or not knowing, three such hypostases can- not be infinite; and, 1. Show what might cast a thinking man upon suppo- sing they may be all infinite for ought one knows : 2. Then consider the ditficuUy that is in it. 1. As to the former. That the Father virtually (or emi- nently rather) comprehends all being, created and uncrea- ted, there is no doubt. Nor asrain, that what is froin him, by perpetual, natural, necessary emanation, cannot but be homoousial to himself, the Athanasian differences only sup- posed, of being unbegotten, and begotten, &.c. Bat how to understand these is the difficulty ; i. e. how the same numerical nature is both begotten and not begotten ; nor will I determine it. Let them do it that can better. I for my part, as I have said, assert nothing in this matter, only have proposed to be considered what may be thought possible nerein. But if any would set themselves to consider this matter, I would have them take the difficulty they are to consider, entirely, and as it tinly is in itself; that they may not be n Tliese Considcrationsi, p. 31, 32. short in their reckoning. And to that purpose to bethink themselves what is the proper character (as Athanasius, and before him Justin Martyr, phrase it) or modus of the Son (for instance) that 'tis to be begotten. Thi;;, methinks, should bear very hard upon the mere modalisls, who here- upon must say, that to be begotten is the only thing begot- ten ; and so, consequently, that to be begotten, is the thing that is peculiarly said to be incarnate, and that .suflered, (fee. For they must assign that which distinguishes the Son from the Father, otherwise they will make the Father be begotten, which is somewhat harder than to be Patri- pasxians, or to make him to have suffered. But it must also be upon the matter even the same diffi- culty, to say, " the same numerical nature, with the modus, is begotten." For then the same numerical nature must still be both unbegotten, and begotten, which is very hard. And if they reply, Yes, but under a distinct modus : Well ; but what IS that distinct modus ? And when they find it is but to be begotten, they must be hugely abashed, as one of less deep thought than they would think. For so, the nature being common both to the Father and the Son, all that is peculiar to the begotten from the begetter, will still be but to be begotten ; i. e. when the question is asked, What only is begottCLn 1 the answer will be but as above. To be begot- ten. It hath hitherto, therefore, been only inquired, whe- ther it will not seem easier to suppose each subsistent to have its own singular nature, though homoousial, as the two latter being by emanation from the first, it cannot but be "? Which hath been often inculcated, and is plain in it- self. Mere arbitrary productions may be very diverse from their original ; but purely natural, especially emana- tive, cannot be so. And then the only considerable difficul- ty which remains is this now before us, vi2. the finiteness or infiniteness, of these three hypostases. 'Tis plain they can- not all be finite. But here our present adversary places his j»rincipal pains and labour, to prove, what he knows nobody will deny, that they cannot be so. And hence he carries awa)' glorious trophies, that three, or three thousand finiies, will never make one infinite. — Spolia ampla. But how knows he they are not all infinite 1 That, in short, which he ha!h here to say, is but this, and can be no more than this, till his thoughts have run through and compassed the never-utmost range of infiniteness, Tt^sr. That he knows they are not he knows not what ! But how can he soberly say that 7 How can he either affirm or deny of another what he doth not understand 1 Is this his de- monstration of the im»possibility of a trinity in the God- head 1 Suppose the Father infinite, cannot the other two be infinite also, for ought he knows 1 How doth he know they cannot 1 By the same medium, by which he knows it, he may make other mortals know it too, if he think fit to communicate it. Which, from so mighty confidence, es- pecially \^•ilen he pretends it to be so ea.sy, I have hitherto expected, but in vain. Is it because the first is infinite, therefore the two other cannot be sol I am sure he ought not to say so, whatever others may, or whatsoever the truth of the thing is, (which we shall inquire into by and by,) for lie hath over and over acknowledged more infinites than one; as when he ascribes infinite comprehension to the mind of man, (as hath been noted,) page 8. of these Considerations. He doth not indeed say the mind is sim- ply in itself infinite, but it is so in respect of its compre- hension, which comprehension must therefore be infinite. How agreeable or consistent these terms are, the infinite comprehension of a finite mind, we are not to consider ; let him take care for that, who can easily make light of such trivial difficulties as these. But in the meantime this infinite comprehension is an infinite something, not an infi- nite nothing; and then so many minds, so many comprehen- sions, and so many infinites. No doubt he includes his OAvn mind ; and 'tis possible he may think some other minds as comprehensive as his own. And ought not to think it im- possible, supposing an imcrealed eternal Word, and Spirit, in the Deity, that they may be infinite, as well as the com- prehension of his own and some other minds. " Besides what he seems to grant of infinite guilts, and punishments due, though he doth not grant the Sacrifice of Christ to be an equivalent for them. All .show he thinks there may be many infinites, and even in the same kind. ADDRESSED TO H. II. ABOUT THE TRINITY. 165 But though to him, to whom it is not easy to guess what would be ditficult, this would seem a very vincible diffi- culty ; it is of much greater importance, that we may do right to truth, to consider it as it is in itself. And I ac- knowledge it (as I have said over and over) to be in itself a great difficulty, as all sober men have been wont to do, that have had any occasion to employ their thoughts that way. But my part herein hath less of difficulty in it ; which is only to expect, and examine, what another will attempt to prove from this topic, not to assert any thing myself. My opponent takes upon him boldly to pronounce, " there can- not be three distinct hypostases in the Deity." Why 1 say I. Because, saith he, that will suppose each of them infinite, which cannot be. I say. Why can it not be 1 He perhaps may tell me, If any one be infinite, nothing can be added thereto, or be without its compass, much less can there be another infinite added to the former. I only now say, you talk confidently in the dark, you know not what : and so as to involve yourself in contradictions, do what you can : 1. In saying nothing can be added to what is infinite. 2. In pretending to know, if any thing can be added, how much or how little can. 1. In saying nothing can be added to, or be without the compass of, what is infinite. For then there could be no creation, which I cannot doubt him to grant. Before there was any, was there not an infinitude of being in the eternal Godhead 1 And hath the creation nothing in it of real being? Or will you sa}'' the being of the creature is the being of God 1 I know what may be said (and is else- where said) to this, and 'twill better serve my purpose than his. 2. In pretending to know what can or cannot be added. Or that, in the way of necessary eternal emanation, there cannot be an infinite addition ; though not in the way of voluntary, or arbitrary and temporary, production. The reason of the difference is too obvious to need elucidation to them that can consider. But for your part (I must tell my antagonist) you have concluded yourself, even as to that which carries the greatest appearance of impossibility: come off as you can. You say,° "a body of an inch square, is not only not infinite in extension, but is a very small body; yet it hath this infinite power, to be divisible to infinity." So, I suppose you must say of half that inch, or a quarter, or the thousandth part of it, much more of two, or twenty, or a thousand inches. You say, indeed, " this body itself is not infinite." Nor will I insist upon the trite and common objection against 5rou: "How can any thing- be divisible into parts which it hath not in it 1" Which yet men have not talked away, by talking it often over. Still harct latcri. — Nor of an infinite power^s being lodged in a finite (and so minute a) subject. But, in the meantime, here are infin- ites upon infinites, an infinite power upon an infinite power, multiplied infinitely ; and still these infinite powers greater and less than other, as either the inch is augmented or di- minished. And he saith, p " the mind of man hath the property of infinite or eternal duration." Therefore so many minds, so many infinities. And he must suppose the infinite duration of some minds to be greater than of others, unless he think his own mind to be as old as Adam's ; or do not only hold their pre-existence, but that they were all created in the same moment. Which if he do, I am sure he can never prove. And so, for ought he knows, there may not only be many infinites, but one greater than ano- ther. What therefore exceeds all limits that are assignable, or any way conceivable by us, as we are sure the Divine Being doth, it is impossible for as to know what differences that vast infinitude contains. And we shall, therefore, but talk at random, and with much more presumption than knowledge, when we lalce upon us to pronounce it impossible there should be three infinite hypostases in the Godhead. Especially considering that most intimate vital union that they are supposed to have each with other, in respect whereof, the Son is said to be ivz6s-ariH, existing in the Father (as Athanasius's phrase is) agreeably to the lan- guage of Scripture, John xiv. 11. and elsewhere. And which, by parity of reason, is to be conceived of the Holy Ghost too, who is also said to search all things, even the o Considerations, page B. 15 deep things of God, 1 Cor. ii. 10. In respect of which union, and the ifnrcoixi'P'i'Jii, which may thence be collected whatever of real perfection, wisdom, power, goodness, &c! is in any one, is each one's as truly as any one's, all being originally in the Father, as the first and everliving Foun- tain of all. As was said. Sober Inquiry, p. 139. . But whereas the considerator urges, " If the Father be infinite in his substance, in his wisdom, his power, his goodness, he is God in the most adequate and perfect sense of the word." I say. Well, and what then 1 If therefore he mean the Son and the Holy Gho.-t must be excluded the Godhead, let him prove his-consequence if he can. And he may find the answer to it. Sober Inquiry, page 141. I shall not transcribe, nor love, when I have writ a book, to write it over again. His notion may fit pagans well enough, or those who are not otherwise taught. Christians are directed to understand that the Deity in- cludes Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Their equality I acknowledge with the mentioned Athanasian exception ; notwithstanding which, that they equally communicate in the most characteristic difference, of the Deity, from all creatures, viz. necessity of existence, is conceivable enough. To sum up all, the considerator I understand, even by the whole management of his discourse, and especially by the conclusion of that part wherein the inquirer is concern- ed, to have most entirely given up this cause, as ever did man. The inquirer's onh^ undertaking was to maintain " the possibility of a trinity in the Godhead," in opposition to his former daring assertion, of its being impossible, and nonsense. He now, in conclusion, says, the inquirer saw there must be a nexus ; intimating, if there can, that he hath gained his point; but, 'tis added, "he durst not venture to say what it was." To which I nuist say. That this is most uncautiously said ; I will not say, deceitfully, though I know 'tis said untruly : and he might have known (or remembered) too, that he, (the inquirer) often spoke of it, as a necessary, natural, eternal, vital, and most intimate imion. He further says, he only ex- plains it by the union of soul and body. Which asrain, 1. Is so great a misrepresentation, that I wonder he would say it here, when he himself but two or three pages off recites as the inquirer's words, " If God could unite into one, two such contrary natures, let any man give me a reason why he might not (much more) first make, and then unite two, and if two, why not three, spirits," &c. Is this only to explain it by the union of soul and body ] But by the way, that " first make, and then unite," was none of the inquirer's, but appears thrust in to make what was manifestly po.ssihle, seem impossible. Sic notus — let two substances be created entire, with no nafural propen- sion to each other, they are capable of no natural union, without change of their natures. Who sees not, it were a contradiction to suppose them still the same, and not the same? But suppose them created with mutual aptitudes to union, and united, what should hinder but they may continue united, without being confounded? 2. And 'tis said impertinently, as well a-s untruly ; for what if he had not explained it at all, is it therefore im- possible, which it belonged to him to prove, or he did nothing; and he hath done nothing towards it. I have asked him before, and now I put it again seriously to him, whether he do in his conscience believe this a good argu- ment : " such a union, i. e. natural, necessar}"^, &c. hath no pattern or parallel in the creation ; therefore it is impossi- ble in the nature of God ?" For what he adds, " That the soul and body in a man are not united into one substance or essence, nor possibly can be ;" the cause indeed depends not on it, but lies re- mote from it. Methinks however it is very feat, and shows him pinched, that he can be brought to this ! Haih a man no substance ? Is he a shadow ? Or hath he no essence 1 Is he a non-entity ? or is his essence a body ? Then a body is a man. Or his essence a spirit? Then, a spirit is a man. If he sav either of these, I wish he would tell us the quantitv of those propositions, that we may know whether hemeans that everv body is a man, or every spirit is a man ? I am sure where the" essence is, there must be p Considerations, p. S. 166 A VIEW OF THE LATE CO^^SIBERATIONS, &c. the essentiatim. Or whether soul and body united, make nothing different from eiiher, or boih disunited 1 Or whe- ther a man be only such a thinj^ as a pie 1 Or why might not a pudding serve as well, if made up of several in- gredients "? He hath greatly indeed obliged mankind for such an honour done them flf indeed the cause depended on it, he would have good store of philosophers to confute, and ail that have any concern for their own kind, before he could disprove the possibility of the supposed union in the Deity ; and you have nothing for it but his bare word, which (at least, without the addition of his name) will not do the business. -Nor, if he could also bring us a demon- stration against the union of soul and body, can he thereby prove such a union as we suppose in the Godhead im- possible. The case is quite another. The union of the soul and body was never by me called essential ; for I well know, if they were essentially united, in the strict sense, they could never be disuniied. But 'tis commonly called a substantial union, and I called it natural in respect of the principle, nature, in contradistinction to art. As for the supposed union we speak of in the Deity, that, being necessary, original, eternal, it must be essential, or none : but with such distinction as before was supposed. For it was union, not identity, that was meant, which union, with such distinction, till they be proved impossible, the inquirer's cause is untouched. And is certainly to any such pui-pose,^ not in the least touched by the considerator. Whether there be any such union that may admit to be called essential among the creatures, doth neither make nor mar. We have never said there was, nor doth the stress of the cause lie upon it. I find indeed an ingenious, merry gentleman, animad- verts upon a postscript writ against the Sober Inquiry, and upon a letter in answer to it, who at a venture calls all essential union, essential contradiction, and substantial nonsense. Who this is, I will not pretend to guess, only I guess him not to be the same with the considerator, for this, besides other reasons, that he calls the author of the considerations a great man ; and I scarce think he would call himself so. His wit and sportful humour, I should have liked better in a less serious affair. For this he bold- Iv pronounces, in immediate reference to the trinity itself, (that the world might know he hath a confidence, at least equal to his wit,) I can easily abstain from asserting that any created unions are to be called strictly essential, be- cause then they must be simply indissoluble. And I see not but whatsoever things the Creator hath united, he ma}' disunite, if he be so pleased. Yet one might have expected this author to have been a little more civil to him whom he styles the late famous Dr. More, who hath published to the world his express sentiments in this matter, that created spirits have real amplitude, made up of indiscerptible parts, essentially united, so as not to be separable, without an- nihilation of the whole. One would think he should not have treated him so, as to make his essential union sub- stantial nonsense. But there are those left in the world, who have that veneration for the Doctor, as to think it no indecent rudeness to this gentleman, not to put his judg- ment in the balance against the Doctor's, or to distinguish between his calling it nonsense, and proving it so. But if any wonder that they w'ho think there is no such thing as an essential union among creatures, do yet think there may be in the uncreated Being, they will show them- selves mighty wise in their wonder, i. eAn wondering that the creatures are not God. And if they further hereupon inquire, why we will then make use of unions not essen- tial, among creatures, to illustrate that which is supposed essential in the uncreated being, and expect very particular, distinct accounts of every thing so represented ; they w\\{ show themselves as wise in their expectations, i. e. that p Mejiepiiriievas Ex6. tti^. r Liber. Epist ad Atban. »v /(ipifsrai. they think nothing can serve to illustrate, unles^it be like in all re>pcc' ■. That question still returns. Is every thing to be judged by any man of sense impossible in God, whereof he hath not given distinct and explicit accounts, and illustrations from somewhat in the creatures'? And another will be added. Is there any thing originally in God, not essential to him ] But when the world is so full of instances of substantial unions, without confusion, or identification, that he cannot so much as name me a created substance, that he can be sirre exists absolutely simple, I am sure it can be no contradiction to suppose that there may be un- created, necessary, eternal union, without confusion or identification ; and that it would be, as he phrases it, es- sential contradiction, or substantial nonsense, to say that things united necessarily (though distinct) can possibly ever admit of separation. And if our modern anti-trini- tarians (for I will not call them by the inept name of uni- tarians, which as rightfully belongs to them whose adver- saries the}' are pleased to be, as to themselves, and therefore cannot distinguish the one from the other) would allow it to be their method to understand the doctrine of the or- thodox ancients, before they decry and hoot at it, they W"ould find that as they allow sufficient distinction of the sacred hi/posfases ; so the union they assert, is not such as identifies them, but only signifies them to be inseparable. So speaks Athanasius himself, " we think not, as the Sa- bellians, that the Son is of one and the same essence with the Father, but consubstantial — nor do we assert? three hT/postascs separated as with men, bodily, lest with the Gentiles, we should admit polytheism," &c. So do Liberius and he agree in sentiment. The one says, "■ " The Son is not separated from the Father's hypos- tasis." The other, » " We hold not the Son divided from the Father," &c. And upon the most impartial, faithful, and diligent search and consideration, I do solemnly declare there needed not more of rationality or intelligibleness in this doctrine, to keep it from being ridiculed, as contradictious, and non- sense; but only less prejudice, and more modesty, in the opposers of it, with more reverence of the Divine Majesty, upon this (obvious) apprehension, that if it be true, it must be sacred, divine truth. This author would fain have me with him to the play- house, whither really I have no leisure to accompany him, nor much temptation ; for I perceive it hath filled his mind with ideas not useful to my purpose ; nor, I think, to any good one of his own. If there he learned to jest away that which should be the best part of himself; and of which Socrates, dying, told his friends it would be gone far enough out of their hands, and for that which was left behind, they might bury, or do with it what they pleased ; if there he was taught to ridicule the holy apostle's dis- tinction of an h £V(o, and b t'^w, an inner and an outer man; and when he hath thrown the former of these out of his notion of himself ; for my part, I must think of that which is left, that the silly Indian is the less silly creature of the two. And besides as he is too much given to play, to mind any thing of serious discourse, so I find he is not through- out honest in his play neither ; but that even when he pretends to sit out, and be but a spj^ctator, only taking care that there be fair play, he falls in himself, and plays booty. Nor do I find he hath any thing of argument in his dis- course, which hath not been considered already in the dis- course I have had with the considerator. I therefore take leave of them both toge'iher, and of you too, Sir, being in great sincerity, Your affectionate humble servant, The Inquirer. a Rescript. Ath. ad Lflienon. ov iiaKCx,wpi<7jievov. ADVERTISEMENT. The " Letter to the Clergy of both Universities," came not to my sight, or notice, till some hours after the last sheet of this discourse was brought to me from the press ; I have not time therefore to say much to it, nor yet snould say more than I do had I never so much. The author seems to think what he was now doing, as to the inquiry, super- fluous, because he said it was so fully done by an abler hand, &c. In the meantime, he was in ill case, tliat he was neither able to write to any purpose, nor be silent : a most deplorable double impotency ! But he hath, notwithstanding his modesty, shown a double ability, to invent and make an hypothesis of his own fingers' ends, and then most dexter- ously to combat that shadow. Three inadequate Gods is indeed (to vise his own phrase) his own invention, constantly disavowed by the inquirer, who with the generality of trinitarians, calls the three subsisients in the Godhead, God ; being each of them necessarily existent, but none of them alone, exclusively, a God. What art he hath, is shown in fighting this his own figment. As also that of parts of the Deity, other than con- ceptible, which no man can avoid. So we have his dream of a third part of a God, about which he so learnedly raves in his dream, as to disprove, as effectually, any God at all. For I appeal to what sense he hath left himself, whether power alone be God, exclusive of wisdom and goodness 1 Then 'tis an inadequate, or a not complete, notion of God ; then, by his profound reasoning, not eternal. No more are Father, Son, and Holy Ghost parts, unless you be ena- moured of the bull, impartible parts, that never were parted, nor ever can be. As what are neces-sarily united (though unconfounded) cannot, without nonsense and contradiction, be said to be parted. His fiction, that what is from the eternal Father by neces.sary emanation, cannot be eternal, but must have a beginning, is of the same stamp. He did not need when he writ, to have abandoned all logic and common sense, that would have told him rclata sunt simul natura. His so confidently taking it for granted on all hands, that all infinites are equal, shows his little compass of thought, and how unacquainted he is with the diificulties of a controversy, wherein yet he will be so over-meddle- some. Q,ui pauca respicit, tf-c. But who so bold as 1 1 leave him to compound that difference with his abler con- siderator, whether one inch and two inches be equal 1 and so bid him good night. A LETTER WRITTEN OUT OF THE COUNTRY TO A PERSON OF aUAUTY IN THE CITY, WHO TOOK OFFENCE AT THE LATB SERMON OF DR. STILLINGFLEET, (DEAN OF ST. PAUL'S,) BEFORE THE LORD MAYOR. CONSIDERING THYSELF LEST THOG ALSO BE TEMPTED. GAL. VI. 1. JOHANNES COLETCS, DECANHS aUEM DICUNT, DIVI FAULT, — APUD SUOS ANGLOS ALTER PENE APOSTOLUS PAULUS HABITUS EST. POLYD. VIRGIL. Sir, I PERCEIVE your mind is disturbed, which my friend- s-hip -^'ith you can no more let me be unconcerned for, than if I heard you were sick ; nor less to study yovtr re- lief. Such may be the cause and measare of your pas- sion, and such the disproportion between the one and the other, as to need it a great deal more, though yet perhaps to deserve it less. For your sickness might be 3'our infe- licity only, but a perturbation that exceeds its cause, can- not bat be j'our faiilt. Which kind of evil, though it be much greater, and therefore needs no application for the removing of it ; yet it can challenge less help from ano- ther, because you are your own aiilicter, and may, by de- pendence on Divine help, when you please, cure yourself, which no man else can do for you. But if another may contribute towards it, by laying before you apt considera- tions which you are yourself to apply, you know you are to expect it from no man's good will more than mine. If indeed you expect much from my ability, that is another fault, entirely your own, and whereto you could have no temptation. Thus much I freely profess to you, that I have a great value of an equal temper and composure of mind, not apt to be unduly moved, or entertain anything that occurs with indecent perturbation, or other resentment than is due and suitable to the occasion : and desire it more than either to be in the best external circumstances, or not to be in the worst. As I wish for myself, I wish for you ; and therefore am willing to place my endeavour accord- ingly, where it may be in a possibility of effecting some- what to your advantage, and where it is most desirable it should. In the present case, the fault I find with you is, that your resentment of the matter you complain of is undue, and not proportionabfe to the occasion. And whereas you seem to labour imder the distemper and excess of a two- fold passion; of fear, lest a just and good cause (as you and I do both account) should suffer some erreat prejudice, by this opposition of Dr. Stillingfleet; and of anger, that he from whom better things might have been expected, should attempt any thing in this kind. I shall hereupon endeavour to represent to you the causelessness both of your fear, and (in great part) of your anger. And first defend the cause against Dr. Stillingfleet, and then add somewhat in defence of Dr. Stillingfleet against you. 1. As to the former we are, I. To give the plain state of it, with the Doctor's judg- ment against us in it. II. To discuss the matter with the Doctor, and show ; 1. The indefensibleness of that judgment; 2. The ineffi- cacy of the Doctor's attempt to defend it. I. It is first necessary that we have a true state of the cause itself before our eyes; which is plainly this, — That as there are very great numbers of people, beyond what the ministers of parishes, in divers places, can possibly perform ministerial duty unto ; so there are withal very many that cannot be satisfied in conscience, to intrust their souls and their spiritual concernments to the pastoral care and conduct of the parochial ministry only ; though they generally have a reverend esteem of divers who are of it, do, many of them, very frequently partake of some part of their labours, and rejoice in them as great ornaments and real blessings of the Christian church. But these are very unproportionable in number to the necessities of the people, and are by legal restraints tied up one way, as they by conscientious are another, in respect of some principal parts of Christian worship ; without which they should be visibly in the condition of pagans. There are also many persons who ha ve been devoted to the service of God and his church in the ministerial func- tion ; some of them in the way which now obtains, others in a way which this reverend author did not disapprove, who are not satisfied in conscience about the terms upon which they might have continued, or may be admitted, parochial incumbents. So that here are numerous flocks scattered without pastors, here are many pastors without flocks. The people, it is true, on whose behalf these papers are more especially written, are in this destitute condition by their own scruples. Nor is it the present design to justify all those scruples. But they are, with many, of long con- tinuance, and, for ought appears, unremovable. If they should be deferred, and bidden to use patience, while such further endeavours are used with them as this sermon con- tains, yet death will hav^e no patience, nor be deferred. So that there are multitudes passing into eternity out of a Christian nation, having no benefit of Christian ordinan- ces; no means of instruction in the truth and doctrines of the Christian religion, in order to their salvation. The cau.se which is de facto tnken in this distress for their relief, is that which the reverend author bends himself against in this sermon. And there are two sorts of persons concerned in it. The people ; who, rather than return to the state of paganism, implore the help of these imemployed ministers, desiring them to perform the duty of Christian ministers towards them. And the ministers ; who, rather thaii they A LETTER CONCERNING DR. STILLINGFLEETS SERMON. 169 should cease to be Christians, or themselves always cease from the work of ministers, comply with their desires, and, as they can, allow them their desired help. This author doth more directly and professedly speak to the case of the people ; to that of the ministers, only by way of oblique reflection. You and I who (among the former) do often partake in the worship and ordinances of God, in the separate assemblies, (though we are not so squeamish as to balk the public, nor so unjust and un- grateful, as not to thank God for the excellent advantages that are sometimes to be met with there,) are both concern- ed, and led by the Doctor's discourse, to consider what is said as to this case of ours. Which yet I would have us consider not so appropriately, as to exclude them our very compassionate consideration, that are more pinched and contined to narrower limits, by their own scruples, than we are ; and whose number you cannot but apprehend to be so great, as to call for a very large compassion in con- sidering their case. It is indeed a case of far-prospect, and which looks down upon after-times. You know how easily it may be deduced all along from the beginning of the English re- formation, when some very eminent among our reformers M'cre not well satisfied with the ceremonial part of the constitution settled at that time; how an unsatisfied party hath gradually increased from age to age among the com- mon people also. They are now grown very numerous. And unless some very overpowering impression upon men's minds (not reasonably to be expected according to common measures) should alter the case, it is still likely to increase in succeeding ages. You are ignorant that no one thing is more commonly scrupled by this unsatisfied party, than the addition of that federal rite in the dedicat- ing of Iheir children to God, the signing them with the sign of the cross; which many (how justly or unjustly I am not now to discuss) esteem so sinful a practice, tiiat, rather than admit it, they will choose not to offer their children to baptism. Nor is it itself of less weight (per- haps 'tis of much greater) that, in this solemn dedication, they have no opportunity of performing the parental duty, of covenanting with God on behalf of their own children ; but that part (with the exclusion of themselves) is to be done by others whom God hath not concerned in the business; and who, after the solemnity is over, are never like to concern themselves. And there are divers other scruples besides, in reference to this and other parts of worship, that, with multitudes, are in no great probability to admit of cure. Now let us see what the reverend Doctor's judgment is upon this state of our case, who dissent from the estab- lished way, whether the people, or their ministers ; and that both concerning what they do, and what, by conse- quence from his judgment ujion their case, they are to suffer. For the practice of the people in this case (at least the negative part of it) he hath some charity in his censure, for in their declining to join in the public assemblies, he believes them generall}^ to practice according to their judg- ment, as he professes, page 37 of his sermon. For the ministers, most of them, none at all, who, as he says in the same place, he believes go against theirs. His words are, " I dare say, if most of the preachers at this day in the separate meetings, were soberly asked their judgments, whether it were lawful for the people to join with us in the public assemblies, they would not deny it ; and yet the people that frequent them, generally judge otherwise. For it is not to be supposed, that faction among them should so commonly prevail beyond interest." But his judgment concerning what both are to undergo is eventually, and in the sequel, as he states their case, much more hard in respect of the people, who cannot re- lieve themselves ; whereas the ministers, according to the notion he hath of them, presently may. We are to attend chiefly to what he says in reference to the lay people, and shall consider, I. How severe he is towards them; and, 2. How well consistent he is therein ■with himself. 1. His severity towards those of us in respect of what we practise, who put ourselves under the pastoral care of other than the parochial ministers, is to be seen in what he pro- poses to himself to evince, page 20. viz. That our pro- ceeding to the forming of separate congregations, t. e. under other teachers, and by other rules, than what the established religion allows, is the present case of separation which he uitends to consider, and to make the sinfulness and mischiel of it appear. He doth, you see, in short, absolutely pro- nounce our practice in this case to be sinful and mis- chievous. Now it is hence also to be collected, how hard things he would have us suffer upon supposition of our only remain- ing unsatisfied to join ourselves into the parochial coc- munion. He doth not indeed bespeak for us gibbets, whipping-posts, or dungeons ; nor (directl3-) any thing grievous to our flesh. But to such as consider themselves to have souls made for an everlasting state, the doom which his words imply, in the mentioned place, cannot be thought gentle. Which that^-ou may apprehend the more distinctly; observe that he hath nothing to say against our bare suspending communion in some particular riles which we modestly .scruple, while we use it in what we judge lawful, page 20. (whereas, page 37. he supposesus generally to judge it unlawful to join in the public assemblies,) to which purpose he also speaks in his late dialogues, page 171. and 172. (giving his antagonist an accoimt of what he had said in his J/cnicitm to the matter now in discourse,) viz. That some scrupulous and conscientious men, after all endeavours used to satisfy themselves, may remain unsatis- fied a,s trj tlifi lawfulness of some imjiosed rites, but dare not proceed to positive separation from the church, but are willing to comply in all other things save in those rites which they still scruple : and concerning these he puts the question, whether such bare nonconformity do involve such men in the guilt of schism. And this he confesses he resolved negatively (approving or not disavowing that reso- lution.) Thus far indeed he well agrees with iiimself j and seems to have no quarrel with u.s. But coiisider the fatal consequence. He well knows that if we suspend communion in the rite of the cross, (upon our never so modest scruple,) m'c cannot have our children ministerially dedicated to God in the ordinance of baptism, nor be so ourselves, if being adult, we remain any of us unbaptized ; (as he may well apprehend many among us are ;) nor if we decline the use of sponsors as to what we conceive should be performed by parents for their children, and by adult persons for themselves. Aotl that if we kneel not before the consecrated elements at the Lord's table, we are not to partake of his holy supper. Yea, and what if we scruple somewhat that is more than ritual, to sit under the ministry of a noted drunkard, or open enemy to godliness, as our teacher and guide, when we might enjoy the fruitful labours of one that hath not his qualifications every Lord's day ? No, by no means, without limitation, or the supposition of any possible case wherein it may be otherwise, a meeting never so little be- sides the established course, he will make appear is sinful and mischievous, and not tolerable upon any terms. What then would he have us do 1 He directs us indeed afterw ard to the endeavour of satisfaction. But what shall we do if after our utmost endeavours our dissatisfaction remain ? What, while we are endeavouring 1 which may be all our days in vain. What if we can never be satisfied concerning the established way of baptism for oui-selves and our children, and of partaking the btxly and blood of our Lord and Saviour 1 Nor to hear or give countenance to such a, one pretending to preach the glorious gospel of the blessed God, who either sub.>tantially perverts and de- praves it, or whose profligate life proclaims him an ojjposer and enemy to the holy rules and design of it 1 Nor to commit ourselves to the pastoral care and charge of a less exceptionable person, yea though otherwise never so de- serving, that hath tied his own hands, and is under such restraints that he cannot, or so disinclined that he will not, dispense the ordinances of Christ in such a way, as wherein with satisfaction to our consciences we may enjoy them. ■ . , Read over the Doctor's sermon ag-ain and agam, anci you will find no course is prescribed us. but to sit still without any enjoyment of Christian ordinances at all. And with how great "numbers must this be the case! tor him- self professes to believe, that the people that Irequent the separate meetings (who vou know are not a few) do gene- 170 A LETTER CONCERNING rally judge it to be unlawful to join in the public assem- blies. And are we always to sit still thus 1 That is to exchange visible Christianity for visible (at least negative) paganism ! This, if you take the whole compass of it, is a thing of awful importance that so great a limb of a Chris- tian nation, they and their posterity, should be paganized from age to age, and cut of from the whole body of the Christiancommunity ,onlybccause they scruple some things, the least exceptionable whereof are no part of the Christian institution, (as himself, and they whose advocate he is, will freely confess,) nor do necessarily belong to it, being (as they contend) but indifferent things. He seems rather contented we should not be Christians at all, than not to be Christians of this particular mode: that we should rather want the substance of Christ's gospel and sacra- ments, than not have them accompanied with confessedly needless additions, and which we fear to be forbidden us by their Lord and ours. We do sincerely profess wherein we decline the commu- nion he invites us to, we only displease him, and those of his way and mind, out of a real fear of otherwise displeas- ing God. We agree with them in far greater things than we can differ in. We are of that one body which they themselves profess to be of, so far as mere Christianity is the distinction, and collective bond of it, and desire to be under the conduct and government of that one Spirit. We are called with them in that one hope of our calling, and earnestly expect (whatever hard tlioughts they have of us) to meet many a one of them in the participation of the blessed hoped end of that calling. We acknowledge that one Lord, that one faith, that one baptism, (or covenant which the bnptism of our Lord"'s appointment seals,) and that one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in us all. Yet because we cannot, we dare not consent with them to the additions wliich belong- not (and which we fear are unduly affixed) to the religion of Christians, we are adjudged to be (as much as in them is) cut off from Christ, deprived of the dear pledges of his love, and acquisitions of his blood, are driven out from the inheritance of the Lord, and it is effect said to us. Go and serve other gods. Thus far the severity of this reverend author tov/ards us extends. Which while we thus truly represent and recount, let us also, 2. Consider what agreement it holds with Avhat we else- where observe from him: We have already taken notice, that for our bare nonconformity he acquits "us of the guilt of schism. And, page 20. of this sermon, he says, he doth "not confound bare suspending communion in some par- ticular rites, which persons do modestly scruple, and using it in what Ihey judge to be lawful, with either total, or at least ordinary forbearance of communion in what they judge to be lawful : and proceeding to the forming sepa- rate congregations," &c. 'Tis this latter he severs and singles out for his opposition. Against our suspending communion in some particular rites, (which we judge un- lawful,) if we ttse it in what we judge lawful, (which I, with him, presume the lay-dissentcrs in England generally do,) he hath nothing to say: yea, and undertaking to "show what error of conscience doth excuse a man from sin. in following the dictates of it ; he tells us, page 44. that '" if the error be wholly involuntary, t. e. if it be caused by invincible ignorance," (which he thus explains in the fol- lowing words,) "or after using the best means for due in- formation of his conscience; though the act may be a fault in itself, yet it shall not be imputed to him for a sin, because it wanted the consent of the mind by which the will is determined." And now, Sir, I beseech )'ou consider, (L) When he confesses if we be willing to be .satisfied, and our error be involuntary, it shall not be imputed to us for a sin ; why are Ave so severely dealt with for what is not to be imputed to us for a sin 1 If it were any, rae- thinks it should not deserve such rigour at tlie hands of men, that are themselves also liable to mistakes a.nd errors. Is it so very criminal, if every poor illiterate dissenter in England (man or woman) cannot m all their days attain to a better and more seUled judgment in such "dubious matters, than this reverend person had himself arrived to twenty years ago 1 Especially that never had, or were ca- pable of having, tho.se peculiar helps and inducements, to temper and reform their judgments, that he hath enjoyed. 'Tis a long time that his own judgment has been ripening to that maturity, as, at length, to think it fit and seasonable to say so much as he hath, for the reforming of ours, even in this sermon. Methinks he should not be so very quick and hard towards us, upon so slender a cause, as our scrupling .some particular rites, to adjudge us and ours to be totally deprived of baptism, which themselves count necessary to our salvation, and of the other ordinances of Christ, whichthey donot think unnecessary. And consider, (2.) Whereas he says, that if a man err after using the best means for due information of his conscience, — it shall not be imputed to him as a sin. What if we err this error (as he counts it) after using the best means for due infor- mation ; that we ought rather than to return to the state of paganism, to bear our part in the forming of such meet- ings for the worship of God, as wherein we may, with the satisfaction of our own consciences, enjoy all his holy ordinances 1 It will surely be within the compass of this his general position, and not be imputable as a sin. Then it is to be hoped we should rather choose to do so, than pa- ganize ourselves, or live in the wilful neglect of his institu- tions : which to do by our own choice, wlien we might do otherwise, we cannot but think a very great sin. If here the Doctor should assume to himself to tell us not only that we err herein, (whereof we are to regard his proof, as it shall be considered by and by, more than his affirmation,) but also that our error is wilful, we shall appeal from him to one that better knows, how willingly, how gladly we should receive information, and admit the belief, tha;t we ought to content ourselves entirely and only with such provisions as the established religion (to use the Doctor's phrase) allows us, if the evidence of the thing it- self did not seem irresistibly and unavoidably to persuade, us otherwise. And for him to say so, were but to suppose men wilful, only for not being of his mind, who can us easily think him so, for not being of theirs. But this can- not be a question between the Doctor and us; whom, as we have taken notice above, he hath so far obliged, as to admit, (page 37.) " that we generally judge as we practise, and that it is not to be supposed that faction among us should so commonly prevail bej'ond interest." But since this appears to be his determination concerning us, and that his assertion seems positive and peremptor}', page 20. " That in this our case, to proceed to the forming of con- gregations under other teachers, and by other rules than what the established religion allows, were a sinful and mischievous separation," — v/e are in the next place, II. To discuss the matter with the Doctor; wherein we shall endeavour to show, — 1. The indefensibleness of Ihe judgment the Doctor hath given in this case ; which will both infer, (and in some part excuse) what we are after- wards to discover ; viz. — 2. The infirmity of what is alleged by him in this attempt of his to defend it. 1. For the former, it being obvious to common observa- tion, that a natural self-indulgence and aptness to decline and waive what is of more terrible import to themselves, doth usually insinuate and influence men's minds in their judging of such cases ; we are the more concerned (because a favourable false judgment will do us no good) with an impartial strictness to hold ourselves to the thing itself. And when we most strictly do so, methinks the doctor should have somewhat a hard province of it. Foi his de- termination amounts to thus much, (ihat we ought to be kept in a .state of damnation for scrupling the ceremonies,) i. e. to be deprived of the necessary means of our salvation. And that, while he accounts our scruple (after the use of due means for our information) not imputable to us as a sin : and not that only, but that M^e ought to consent to our own damnation for this no sin of ours; inasmuch as it would be sinful and mischievous to procure to ourselves the necessary means of our salvation in another way, while we apprehend that, without our sin, we cannot have them in the way which he allows us. We are indeed satisfied, that our sin one way or other would contribute little to our salvation. But when also we are satisfied that we cannot enjoy the means of salva- tion in his way without sin ; and he tells us, we cannot without sin enjoy them in our own : we hope every door is not shut up against us, and cannot think the merciiul and holy God hafh so stated our case, as to reduce us to DR. STILLINGFLEET S iiiERMON. 171 a necessity of sinning to get out of a state of damnation. And therefore this reverend author having already deter- mined that our remedy cannot lie (as our consciences are hitherto informed) in coming over to him and his way : for he believes we generally judge itunlav^lul to join with them in the public assemblies, page 37. and says, page 43. "that no man that hath any conscience will speak against the power of it, and he that will speak against it, hath no reason to be regarded in what he .sa3's-" (as no question }ie expected to l)e, otherwise he had not given himself so much trouble;) and concludes, page M. " that we should sin in going against it." As lie also thinks we should in acting with it, which (as is necess-arily implied) we as 3'et see not. Our great hope upon the whole matter is, that our relief must lie in taking the way which Ave do take ; and that it cannot be proved to be sitiful. We reckon it is not, and that the Doctor's judgment herein is simply indefensible, because whatsoever is sin- ful must transgress some law immediately divine, or that obliges by virtue of the divine law. And we cannot find that God hath made an;,' law, or enabled any made by others, to oblige us so far, in our present circumstances, as that we sh<.)uld be involved in the guilt of sin, by some variation I'rom the letter of it. For any divine law that can be supposed to oblige us to the use of the things we scruple, or else to live without the worship and ordinances of God, not knowing any sucli ourselves, we must wait till we be informed of it. And that his law doth give an obliging force so far to any oihei', we asj'et understand not. Wheresoever he hath been pleased to lodge and intrust the keys of tlie church, we do not find he hath appointed them to that use, to ad- mit us into the communion of his worship and ordinances, or totally to exclude us, upon such terms. And herein v.e suppose we have the Doctor consenting with us; who, in his Irenicum, (j'age 21G.) plaiTily a.sserts, "that the dliice which the power of the keys implies is ministerial, and not authoritative ; declarative, and not juridical." And sa3's in the preface to the same book, that "he that tame to take away the unsupportable yoke uf the Jewis'h eeremo- nies, did never intend to gall the disciples' necks with an- other instead of it." Whereto he immediately adds in the same preface: "And it would be strange the church should require more than Christ himself did ; and make other condiiions of her communion, than our Saviour viid of discipleship. What possible reason can be assigned or given wh}' such things should not be sufficient for com- munion with a church, which are sufficient for eternal saivalion? And certainly those things are suflieient [ov that, which are laid down by our Lord and Saviour in his Avord. AVhat ground can there be why Christians should not stand upon the same terms now, Avhich the}' did -in the timeof Christ and his apostles] Was not religion sutti- ciently guarded and fenced in them 1 Was there ever moi e true and cordial reverence in the worship of God 1 What charter halh Christ given the church to bind men up to more than himself hath done, or to exclude tho^^e ficm lier society, who may be admitted into heaven 1 Will Christ ever thank men at the great day for keeping sncli out from communion with his church, whom he wil! vouchsafe not only crowns of glory to, but it may be avrc- olce too, if there be any such things there "? The grand commission the apostles were sent out with, was only to teach what Christ had commanded them. Not the least intimation of any power given them to impose or require any thing beyond what himself had spoken to them, or thej' were diiected to by the immediate guidance of the Spirit of God. It is not whether the things commanded and required be lawful or no; it is not whether indiffer- ences ina^' be determined or no ; it is not how far Chris- tians are bound to submit to a restraint of their Christian lihert}', which I now inquire after; (of those things in the treatise itself:) but whether they do consult for the church's peace and unitT,' who suspend it upon such thinsrs 1 how lareiiher the example of our Savio'.ir or his apostles doth warrant such rig irons impositions ! We never read the anosiles making laws but of things supposed necessary. When the council of apostles met at Jerusalem for deci- ding a case that disturbed the church's peace, we see they will lay no other burden rXfr nrn- iTzivayKti ruvrotv besides these necessar\' things. Acts xv. 29. It was not enough with them that the Things would be necessar)- when they had required them, but they looked on an anlecedem necessity either absolute or for the present slate, Avhich was the only groiuid of iheir imposing those commands upon the Gentile Chi istians. There were, after this, great di'^«rsities of praciice and varieties of observations among Christians, but the Holy Ghost never thought those things fit to be made matters of laws, to which all parties should conform ; all that the apostles required ai; to these, was mutual forbearance and condescen.sion towards each other in them. The apostles valued not differences at all, and tho.se thing.s it is evident they accounted such, which whe- ther men did them or not, was not of concernment to sal- vation. And what reason is there why men should be so stiictly tied up to such things, which they may do or lei alone, and yet be veiy good Christians still ? Without all controversy the main inlet of all the distractions, confu- sions, and -divisions of the Christian world, halh "been by adding other condiiions of church-communion than Christ hath clone." Nor am I now inquiring whether the things commanded be lawful or no; nor whether indiderences may be deter- mined 01- no ; nor how far Christians are bound to submit to a restraint of their Christian liberty 1 But only inquir- ing (as he there doth) concerning the charter given by Christ for the binding men up more than himself hath done. And I fuither inquire, by what power they can be bound which Christ hath not given 1 And if iheie be no such power to bind them, suppose the tilings required were all lawful, (which if it can be evinced, I should re- joice to see done,) yet while, lliey cannot in conscience think th'Cy arc, how can they apprehend them.selves bound iobewiihout the means of salvation, which Christ's cliar- ier entitles them to"? I readily giant it is fit a man do many things for peace and common order's sake whiciij othenvise, no law doth formally oblige him to, i. e. suj>- po.^ing he can do those things without intolerable prejudice to himself. And sj it is commonly determined in the inalter of scandals. But can it be thcaight a man is to pnt himself out of the state or way of .salvation in the compli- ment to such as will otherwise take offence ? and be so courteous as to perish for ever, rather than they shall be displeased? Yea, and it maybe moreover added, that our course be- ing accounted lawful, must also (as the Doctor speak.*;, in another -case) be tivought ^ duty: for the things that are as means necessary to our salvation, are al.so nece.>-sary by divine precejjt. We are commanded to hear God's woi d, to devote ourselves and our children to God in baptism; and, at the Lord's own table, to remember him, and show forth his death till he come. And if we compare together certain positions of this reverend author, we cannot see but he must, as our case is, aclcnowledge our obligation to the piactiee which he here seems to blame. For in his Ireni- cum (pa be com- mended, who after being made a deacon in the church of An-ioch bv Meletius, upon his dearh, bccau-^e Flavianus came in irreorularlv as bishop of the church, woulil nei- ther communicate with him, nor with Paulinu'*, another 172 A LETTER CONCERNING bishof) at tlial time in the city, nor with the Meletians ; but for three years' time withdrew himself from commu- nion with any of them." And, page 113. " Where any church is guilty of corruptions both in doctrine and prac- tice, which it avoweth and professeth, and requireth the owning them as necessary conditions of communion with her, there a non-communion with that church is necessa- ry, and a total and positive separation is lawful and con- venient." What he discourses page HI, 112. upon the question, "Whether it is a sin to communicate with churches true as to essentials, but supposed corrupt in the exercise of discipline 1" many of us will no doubt heartily concur with him in. But it touches not the case of many more, who do not so much fear upon the account of the neglect of discipline, to be involved in the guilt of other men's sin ; (as there seems to be little cause, that part being not incumbent upon us :) nor, if that be his meaning, when he speaks of separating on a pretence of great purity, is it the case with most of us : but we justly fear (and therefore avoid) to be made to sin ourselves, by having such things as we judge to be sinful imposed on us, as the conditions of our communion. And as to this case, this reverend author speaks our sense in this last cited proposition, and pleads our present cause. Nor need we more to be said on behalf of it than what is reducible to that general pro- position ; or particularly, to that second thing, compared with the third, which (page 115.) he says " makes separa- tion and withdrawraent of communion lawful and neces- sary ; viz. corruption of practice, where we say as he doth, we speak not of practice, as relating to the civil conver.sa- lion of men, but as it takes in the agenda of religion ; when unlawful things of that kind are not only crept into a church, but are the prescribed devotion of it : thqse being required (which he adds as an accession to the foregoing) as necessary conditions of communion from all the mem- bers of their church, which makes our withdrawing from them unavoidably necessary, as long as we judge them to be such corruptions as indeed they are." And whereas he instances only in such things as belong to the head of idolatrous customs, (suppressing what might be instanced under the other head, which he also there mentions, viz. superstitious practice,) yet we doubt not if other things also, that appear to be sinful, besides idolatrous customs, be required as necessary conditions of communions, the case will be the same, unless we will distinguish sins into such as be lawful, and such as be unlawful. Or there be any that may be committed, that we may be admitted to the communion of this or that church. Now, to reduce things to the method which suits the pre- sent case ; if this reverend author do still judge, — that where sinful conditions of communion are imposed, there non-communion is necessary, (and those things be sinful to us which our consciences judge to be so,) as he hath ac- knowledged: — and again, if he still judge, — that we are under an obligation to join in church-society, so as to own our religion publicly, and to partake of the ordinances and sacraments of the gopsel ; — he must certainly account that our duty, which he taxes in this sermon as our fault, at ]east till our consciences be otherwise informed, whereof many of us have no great hope. We are indeed not so stupid, as not to apprehend there are laws, the letter whereof seems adverse to us. Nor are we so ungrateful, as not to acknowledge his majesty's cle- mency in not subjecting us to the utmost rigour of those laws ; whom we cannot, without deep regret, so much as seem not, in every thing, exactly to obey. Nor can it enter into our minds to imagine, that he expects to be obeyed by us at the expense of our salvation. Or that it would be at all grateful to him, that being, as we are, unsatisfied in some things that are by the law made necessary to our par- taking the privileges of the Christian church, we should become pagans in duty to him. His majesty was once pleased to give an ample testimony, by his never to be forgotten gracious declaration of March 15, 1672, how re- mote any such thought was from his royal breast; and though we humbly submit to the exigency of those rea- sons of state from whence it proceeded, that we enjoy not the continued positive favour which his majesty was then pleased to express towards us ; yet we have no reason to doubt, but his pretensions are equally benign as they were. Nor, thoiigh it be uncertain to us what laws they are, the authority whereof this reverend person relies upon to make our practice sinful, yei we hope he doth not mean to urge us herein with the laws of the civil government, be- cause those as much forbid our non-communion, (and un- der as severe penalty,) for which, he acquits us from the guilt of schism, or, if we endeavour satisfaction, from any sin imputable to us. But if that should be his meaning, we desire it may be considered how unreasonable it seems, that the design of the law relating to that part of our piactice, which the Doctor in this sermon condemns, being declaredly to pre- vent sedition; they should take themselves to be meant who are conscious of no such design or disposition. And again, that it is not with any reason, charity, or justice, to be supposed, that when that and other restrictive laws were made, either the temporal ruin of so great a part of the nation, as are now found to be dissenters, was intended by the legislators, or the reducing them to the condition of heathens. But a uniformity in the worship of God, being in itself a thing really desirable, this means was thought fit to be tried, in order to that end. And so are human laws, about such mutable matters, generally designed to be probationary ; the event and success being unforeknown. Whereupon, after a competent time of trial, as his majesty was graciously pleased to declare his own favourable sense and intention, so it is very commonly known, that the like propensions were by common sufiiage expressed in parliament, viz. to gr'ant a relaxation. So that the law, being in its own nature nothing else but an indication of the legislator's will, we may account the thing was in substance done, so far as may satisfy a man's pri- vate reason and conscience concerning the lawgiver's m- tention and pleasure ; though it were not done with that formality as uses (and is generally needful) to be stood upon, by them who are the ministers of the law. And that it was not done with that formality also, seemed rather to be from a disagreement about the manner or method of doing it, than about the thing to be done. And how usual is it for laws, without formal repeal, gently and gradually to expire, grow old, and vanish away, not being longer useful, as the ritual part of the Mosaical law did become an ineffectual and unprofitable thing! And how easy were it to instance in many other laws, the letter of which, they that urge these against the dissenters, do without scruple transgress! and from which no such weighty reasons do urge to borrow now and then a point. How many dispense with themselves in many parts of their re- quired conformity, that have obliged themselves to it ! The priests in the temple transgress the law, and are blame- less. Yea, and he that knows all things, and who is Judge of all, knows how little scruple is made of transgressing the laws by gross immoralities and debaucheries. Men learn to judge of the sacredness of laws by their own in- clinations. Any that can be wire-drawn, and made by tor- ture to speak against religion not modified their way, must be most binding. Such as prohibit the vilest and most open wickedness, bind as the withs did Samson. The sum of all is, that whereas we are under the obliga- tion of the divine law to worship God in the use of those his' ordinances which require to be dispensed and attended in society, and that we apprehend we cannot do it without sin in the way this reverend author invites us to. Where- as also we do, with this author, deliberate, whether Christ hath given any power to men to oblige us to the things we scruple, or disoblige us from the things we practise, and judge it unproved. We cannot but reckon the judgment the Doctor hath given in our case (that our practice is sin- ful) is erroneous and indefensible by any man, but least fitly, of most other men, attempted to be defended by him- self. From whom it would little have been expected that he should so earnestly recommend that very thing to us, as the only foundation of union, which he had so publicly told us in his preface to the Irenicum, "was, without con- troversy, the main inlet of all the distractions, confu- sions, and divisions of the Christian world, viz. the adding other conditions of church-communion than Christ hath done." And though he hath lately told the world, there are some passages in that book that show only the inconsiderateness DR. STILLIXGFLEET'S SERMON. 173 of youth, and that he seems to wish unsaid, yet he hath not, that we know, declared that these are some of them. However, since this present determination and judgment of his against us is so peremptory and positive, as well as severe, let us, in the next place, 2. Consider, and carefully examine, as we are concerned, what he hath performed iii defence of it ; and, it is to be hoped, the inefficacy and weakness of his attempt therein will sufficiently appear. What I can find in his sermon hath anv aspect or design that way, is either ad rem, or ad homhiem. And, to my apprehension, his reasonings, of the one kind or the other, are altogether unconcluding. (1.) As to what may be supposed to be ad rem, if you look narrowly, you w'lll find, that the principal things allegf^d by him, "that can, under that notion, give support to his cause, are only affirmed, but not. proved. For in- stance, page 9. when he tells us, that the " apostle sup- posed the necessity of one fixed and certain rule," &c. This had been very material to his purpose; if, 1. He had told us, and had proved, the apostle meant some rule or o'her superadded to the sacred Scriptures ; for then he might, it is to be presumed, as easily have let us know what that rule was, which, most probably, would have ended all our controversy ; it being little to be doubted, we should all most readily have agreed to obey it : or, secondly, If he had proved, that, because the apostle had power to make such a rule, and oblige the churches to observe it, that therefore such church-guides as they, whose cause the Doctor pleads, have an equal power to make other rules divers from his, containing many new things, which he never enjoined, and to enforce them upon the church (though manifestly tending to its destruction, rather than edification.) But these things he doth but suppose himself, without colour of proof Again, for his notion of churches, page 16, 17, 18, 19. examine as strictly as you will what he says about it; and see whether it come to any thing more than only to repre- sent a national church a possible thing 1 And whereto the name church may without absurdity be given. His own words seem to him no higher. " Why may there not be one national church from the consent in the same articles of religion, and the same order of worship 1" page 18. " The word was used in the first ages of the Christian church, as it comprehended the ecclesiastical governors, and the people of whole cities. And why many of these cities being united together under one civil government and the same rules of religion, should not be called one national church, I cannot understand," page 19. But can it now be inferred thence, that therefore God hath actually constituted every Christian kingdom or na- tion such a church 1 Can it further be inferred, that he hath invested the guides of this church, not chosen by the people (according to Scripture, and primitive practice for some ages) with a power to make laws and decrees, pre- scribing not only thing necessary for common order and decency, but new federal rites, and teaching signs and symbols, superadded to the whole Christian institution; with many more dubious and unnecessarj^ things besides 1 And to exclude sober and pious Christians from the pri- vileges that are proper to the Christian church, as such, merely for that out of conscience towards God, they dare not admit into their ■worship those additions to the Chris- tian religion 1 To take order they shall have no pastors, no sacraments, no assemblies for worship 1 And because they will not be so much more than Christians, that they shall not be Christians at all 1 He that would go about to make these inferences merely from the forementioned ground, would gain to be laughed at by all sober men, instead of a conclusion ; whatsoever better success he should have, who should undertake to prove the same things any other way. This reverend author was so wise as not to attempt either of these. But then, in the meantime, what doth the mere possible notion of such a church advantage his cause 1 Because it is possible, there might have been such a Macedonian, or such a Lydian church, is such a one therefore necessary 1 and any other constitution of a Christian church impossible, or unlawful 1 Or because the general meeting of magistrates of the whole city and people together in pagan Athens was called 'Ev.:,\/;Tia, therefore such must be the constitution of a Christian church? and therefore such a church hath such powers from Christ as were above mentioned 1 Here how.soever we make our stand, and say that till the Doctor hath proved these two things ; [1.] That such a church as he hath given us the notion of, as of a thing merely possible, is actually a divine in- stitution ; and, [2] That God hath given to the ecclesiastical governors in it never chosen by the Christian community, or to any other power, to superadd institutions of the nature above mentioned, and to enforce them under the mentioned penalties : all his reasonings that pretend to be ad rem, are to no purpose, and do nothing at all advantage his cause. Yet there are some passages in this part of his dis- course, that though they signify nothing to his main pur- pose, are yet very remarkable, and which 'tis fit we should take some notice of. As when, page Ki. he tells us what he means by whole churches ; viz. " The churches of such nations, which upon the decay of the Roman empire, resumed their just power of government to themselves ; and upon their own- ing Christianity, incorporated into one Christian >ocietv, under the same common ties and rules of order and gov- ernment." As if there could be no whole churches in the world that had not been of the Roman empire, or as if those of the Roman empire could not have been \\ hole churches without resumption of the civil government ; as wc suppose he means. Or, as if (which he intimates, page 19.) we needed this (so dearly e.spoused notion as a ground) to acquit us from the imputation of schism, in our separating from the church of Rome. Which certainl}' it were not for the advantage of the protestant cause to admit ; for then all that remain within the empire, were bound to continue in the com- munion of the Roman church. And in the other kinsr- doms, where princes have not resumed their just rieht of reforming errors in doctrine and corruptions in wur- ship, all should be schismatics that should separate from the church of Rome. Again, when, page 17. he would confute that great mistake, the making the notion of a church barely to re- late to acts of worship ; (a mistake whereof I never knew any man guilty ;) he surely runs into as great an opposite mistake, in making the notion of a church to be no more than of a society of men united together, for their order and government, accoiding to the rules of the Christian religion. Now faith and worship are quite excluded the notion of a church ; and order and government, and the. rules of the Christian religion, but as they refer to these, only included. Whence it will come to pass, thai we can have no notion of one catholic church, fromM'hich yet he argues at the bottom of the same page. Nor, though I dislike the thing, do I understand the strength of the Doctor's argument, against making the notion of the church barely to relate to acts of worship; riz. That if this held true, the church must be dissolved as soon as the congregation is broken up. For will it not also follow as well, that if the notion of a church relate only to order and government, ever}- time any meeting for afiairs of order and government is broken up, the church is dissolved 7 And that an assembler of the states in any kingdom or nation cannot break up without a dissolution of the government ? A parliament (at least) not adjourn or be prorogued without being dissolved 1 And whereas he adds. But if they retain the nature of a church, when they do not meet together for worship, then there is some other bond that unites them, and whatever that is. it con- stitutes the church. Is it not possible there mav be such a bond for worship, as well as for government 1 an obliga- tion to meet at stated limes for that purpose, when they are not met 1 And then (if this were all that were to be said to the contrary) why might not that bond as well serve to constitute the church 1 But, (2.) For his reasonings ad hominevi, they need not de- tain us long ; he argues from the judgment of the assembly of divines and others. All which arguing must suppose, if it concern us, that we are bound to be of ihe same judg- ment with the ministers that are and have been so and so minded ; which I for my part understand not. But I per- 174 A LETTRR CONCERNING ceive here his intention is, having endeavoured to draw us off Iroin our ministers ; now to move another stone, and try if he can draw them otf from ns. For the assembly, I think it fit those that survive of them should be as much concluded by what they then de- termined, as this reverend author by the Irenicum. But I know no reason that such as they represented, nor who ever pretended to be of their party, should be concluded to the world's end. Nor do understand why even the same party may not be as well supposed in a possibility to vary from itself in forty years, as the same man from him- self in less than twenty. If they did incline to deal too hardly with their brethren, that will not justify them who deal more hardly. 'Tis hoped such as have been so in- clined, have been smitten, and suffered the rebukes of the Almighty, repented it, and are become wiser : and when some think themselves grown wiser by prosperity, others by adversity, there is less reason to suspect the latter. Yet also this reverend author ought to have considered the great disparity of the cases he would parallel. For when one sort of men are considering of having only such a frame of things settled, as are imposed by Christ him- self, whether they judge rightly or no, that he hath im- posed every part of that frame, yet while they think and judge that he hath, and consequently that nothing is to be abated of it : 'twere very unfitly argued, that therefore another sort professing to impose many things never im- posed by Christ, should abate nothing of their unnecessary impositions. For such as the Doctor quotes besides of the nonconform- ists, acknowledging the parish churches true churches, and the lawfulness of holding, sometimes, communion with some of them ; it is not to be thought but among so many parlies as come all under one common notion of dissenters from the public rule, (and whom that rule did not find one, but made them so in that common notion,) there must be great diversity of opinions, and proportion- ably differing practices in these matters. I heartily prefer the most moderate, as I believe you do. But here this reverend author takes occasion for so ignominious reflec- tions upon our preachers, as insincere, dishonest, and un- conscientious, as I doubt not, in one twenty years more, his ingenuity will oblige him to repent more heartily, than ever it permitted him to do of his Irenicum. Because he can allege a very few persons that have spoken to this pur- pose, therefore, first, it must be represented to the world as their common judgment; next they are charged with con- cealing this judgment ; (why is this kept up as such a mighly secret in the breasts of their teachers'? page 37.) and then it is endeavoured to make men think they practise against their own judgments, in preaching to separate congregations. Surely you and I are concerned, as we have occasion, to say what we truly can, for the just vindication of our ministers. I doubt riot but you believe, and you have, for some, particular reason to be confident ; it is for our .sakes they expose themselves to the displeasui'e of such men as Dr. St. I must, for my part, sa}', [1.] That I believe it to be the judgment of very few, that every parish is, as such, a true Christian church. I am sorry I have such a ground to fear it of one kind, viz. that some may not be so, as not having among them any tolerable understanding of the most confessedly funda- mental principles of Christian religion. What say you to such, where the minister is grossly ignorant of the princi- ples of religion, or habitually vicious, and of a profligate life 1 Do mere orders make him a minister, who (perhaps since he received them) is become destitute of the most es- sential qualifications 1 any more tiian the habit, a monk"? or a beard, a philosopher 1 Can a Mercury be made of every log '? Not to insist that this reverend author can scarce think they are, from a ground of another kind, because they assemble only for worship, and not for government. [2.] And- surely, a church may be unfit to be commu- nicated with, although it be a true church; (those words of the reverend and worthy dean of Canterbury carry their own light with them to this purpose ; •') as a man may be truly and really a man, though he have the plague upon him, and for that reason be fit to be avoided by all that wish well to themselves. 'Tis true, there are vastly difler- a Scnnon on Josh. xxiv. 15. ent degrees of that unfitness. But I see not how they can apprehend there is the fitness which is simply necessary, who judge there are conditions of communion imposed that are sinful. And I believe this reverend author will think it possible a true church may impose some sinful conditions of her communion ; in which case, he hath determined a non- communion with her necessary and unavoidable. [3.] For those that are of that judgment, the parochial, a.ssemblies ought to be communicated with so far as is alleged was declared. As I know none of the dissenting ministers, that thought they ought always and only to be communicated with, so I see not wilh what pretence it can be said they keep up their judgment herein, as a mighty secret. If it be so, how came this author to have it re- vealed to him 1 Is printing it to the world keeping it secret 1 Some have published it in that way, as we see is known to the Doctor. Others, by their frequent discourses, and their own practice. And, to my observation, divers of them have in their sermons made it much their business to dispose the minds of their hearers to a truly catholic Christian union, as I have been much pleased to take no- tice, some of the conforming clergy do also. But if this be the Doctor's quarrel with any of our ministers, (who thinly such communion lawful) that they do not constantly, in every sermon, inculcate the business of communicating in the ceremonial way, for my part, I shall blame them as much as he, when once he hath made it very evident, that the ceremonies are more profitable, and likely to do more good to the souls of men, than repentance, the faith of the gospel, the fear of God, a good life in this world, and eternal life in the other; which I confess are the more usual subjects, so far as I have had the opportunity to ob- serve, of their preaching. And, let me add, that I can tell you of a secret, which some might be apt to think (as it is really so) is indus- triously and much more unrighteously kept up in one man's breast, that may be conscious of a great design in it. The author of the book, entitled, The Weapon Salve, or Irenicum, seems to have found it some inconveniency to him, to have been the author of so good a book ; where- upon, in a certain soliloquy, (though he is pleased to re- present It as a tripartite dialogue,) he asks himself his own opinion of it, and gives himself this answer : I will tell you freely (as you know men use great liberty in talking with themselves, though prudence would direct that to be done in some cases with great caution, and not to talk in- convenient things too loud, le.st they be too much over- heard) I believe there are many things in it, which if Dr. St. were to write now, he would not have said ; for there are some things which show his youth, and Avant of due consideration ; others, in which he yielded too far, &c. Now here (though I believe he had begun to be inclined to throw away his salve, and use only the weapon for the wounding of sound parts, not the cutting off the incurable, yet) I conceive one may safely enough take it for granted, his intention was not to retract the whole book. But whereas he tells us not what he doth : how would the Doctor take it if one should ask, Why is this kept up as such a mighty secret in his own breast 1 Or, .say the ten- derness cf his mind might, 'tis likely, out of mere shame- facedness, keep him from declaring against what his own conscience tells him is truth ; however, this retractation cannot make that which was true become false. The reason of things is sullen, and will not niter to serve men's conveniences. Perhaps, indeed, his judgment is really altered. If therefore he would acquit himself like an honest and conscientious man, let him tell the world plainly, which be the pernicious principles of that book, that honest and conscientious men, who have thought well of many things in it, (and perhaps the same things which he now disapproves,) may not always be deceived by the shows of reason that deceived him.self, and by which he deceived them. The same justice that obliges not to lay a stumbling-block in the way of the blind, doth also oblige him to remove it who hath laid it : which is to be done, not by professing another opinion, for we depend not on his authority, which he hath himself so much dimin- ished ; but on the reasons he alleged, which if they were Dll. STILLIXGFLEET'S SERMOX. r fallacious, let him show wherein, and answer his own reasons. To sa}"- the truth, the gravity and seriousness wherewith that book was written, appears to have so little of the youih in it, in comparison of the jocularity and sportful humour of some of his latter writings, when he hath been discussing the most weighty and important cases of conscience, that it seems as a prodigy in nature, and that he began his life at tlie wrong end ; that he was old in his youth, and reserved his puerility to his n:iore grown age. But we hope there is a great residue behind, wherein he may have opportunity and inclination to show the world, that he did not repent the pious design of that book; or, at least, with a repentance that (can as well as that) ought to be repented of [4.) And whereas such of the dissenting ministers, as have most openly declared for communicating at some limes with some of the parochial churches, have also de- clared theii' judgment of the lawfulness and necessity of preaching and hearing, and doing otlier religious duties, in other congregations also : if now either the Doctor discern not the inconsistency of these things, or they discern not their inconsistency ; is there nothing to be said or thouglit, but that they acquit not themselves like honest and con- scientious men '! Must it be taken for a demonstiation of a man's want of honesty and conscience, not to be pre- senth' of the Doctor's opinion in eveiy thing ■? or not to see every consequence which he sees, or thinks he sees 1 But let us consider the goodness of this consequence, whicli it must be so great a piece of dishonesty not to dis- cern. If it be the duty of some to communicate some- times with some parish churches, (for this is the most the Doctor could make of that relator's concession, whom he cites page 21, 22. of his sermon.) therefore it is the duly of every one to communicate with any parish church where his abode is, so constant!}' and entirely as never to have any communion with any otherwise constituted con- gregation. This is the thing must be to his purpose inferred ; yea, and he would have it be from somewhat a lower premise. For he 'ells us, page 37. "that he dare say, if most of the preachers at this day in the separate meetings were soberly asked their judgments, whether it were lawful (only) for the people to join with us in the public assemblies, the}' ■would not deny it." He surely dares not say that their meaning was, that it was lawful constantly to join with them in all their parochial assemblies, unless he dares say, what he hath not, from any of them, the least ground io think. Now hereupon he collects, page 38. that our min- isters cannot declare so much in a separate congregation, but this truth must fly in their faces; because he suppo- scth it repugnant to it, to preach at all in a separate con- gregation; and yet afterwards, on the same ])age, he so well agrees with himself as to bid them, if they \vould ac- quit themselves like honest and conscientious men, tell the people plainly that they look on our churches as true churches, and that they may lawfully communicate with us in prayers and sacranients. And where are they to tell them so, but in the separate congregations 1 Singly and severallv he knows it were impossible. Nor do I think he would reckon honesty and conscience obli2:ed them to come and tell the people so in their congregations. Now I am afraid there are but a very few honest and conscientious men in the world at this day, if none are to go for such, but who can perceive the strength and reason- ableness of the above-mentioned consequence. And that you mav farther see what reasons our minis- ters may have, notwithstanding all the alleged concessions, to administer in the worship of God in our assemblies; though it were never so much their common universal judgment, that they and we might sometimes communicate in some of the parochial ; let us consider, that in the more populous and frequented places, as with you at London for instance, the churches cannot receive, some not a tenth part, some not half the people belonging to them, few can receive all. Methinks good men should not be otTended that multitudes do in this di.^tress relieve themselves bv resorting to other places for necessary instruction. And though they be the inclinations of the people that divide ihem this way, and that (as it can be nothing else) though places for their resort be not every where mo it couveniemly situate for their resort, where there is most need, (which must be taken not always where it were most desirable, but where they can be had,) yet they that have a mind, had better go to places at a more inconvenient distance, than have no whither to go; and it is better the necessities of many should be provided for in such an exigency, than of none. In the meantime, the churches of worthy "conform- ing ministers in such populous places are generally filled, as I have been informed, and have sometimes had occasion to observe. Do not necessities of a much lower nature oblige us to recede from stated human rules 1 It is well known there is a law against relieving such as begoiu of their own pa- rishes. But if one find upon the road such a poor wietch ready to perish, am I not bound, notwithstanding, if I can, to relieve him? And who would think, in such a case, I transgressed the true intention of the law? Yea, and God's own laws respecting rituals, common order, and the external part of religion, were by his own direction to yield to far less urgent necessities; to the plucking an ass or an ox out of a ditch ; how much more the souls of men ! Have we not read what David did when he was an hungered, and they that were with him, how he entered into the liouse of God, and did eat the shew-bread, which it was not lawful foi'him lo eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests'? How expressly is it alleged by our blessed Saviour, against those nice and punctilious observers and urgers of the letter of the law, the Pharisees, I will have mercy and not sacrifice. And if he were willing to abate a sacrifice lo himself, that there might be room for the exercise of meicy towards men's bodies, how monitory and rcfuehensive should that be to such merciless persons, as would have the very souls of men themselves be sacrificed to theirsliff and unyielding humours ! Positive laws cease to bind when, by accident, they thwart the law of nature. Which binds to nothing more deeply than the endeavour of saving one's own soul, and (within the bounds of his calling) his neisfhbour's as his own. What if many of our ministers think it lawful, and, at some times, a duty, to join in soiue of the public assem- blies! It is not then their duty, when an inviiiiig oppor- tunity, and so urging necessities, lay betore them greater duty. This reverend author tells us, very pertinently lo this purpose, when he was declaiming against us and our ministers, page 31. of his sermon: "It is a great fault ajuong some who pretend to great niceness in some posi- tive duties, that they have some little regard to com- parative duties; for that which may be a duty in one case, when it comes to thwart a greater duty, may be none." This doctrine we learn from our blessed Saviour in the case of the obligation of the Sabbath ; which he makes to yield to duties of mercy. And can we think that a duty lying upon us, which, in our circumstances, makes a far greater duty impracticable 1 We acknowledse order and unity very lovely and desirable things, but we think it of greater importance that the ministers with whom such fault is found, conduct men, though not in so accurate order, (which thev cannot help,) to heaven, than let them go in the best order, yea (and as the case is) without any at all, lo hell. And what though the necessity of many of us arise from our own scruples, and what though those scruples were without ground, doth it therefore follow we must be aban- doned to perish ? when our very error, if we be willing to admit conviction, (as we sincerely are, could the matter admit it,) is not imputable to us for a sin. This author was once pleased to make it one of his proposals for ac- commodation, page 64. of his Irenicum ; " That no sanc- tions be made, nor mulcts nor penalties be inflicted en sucli, M'ho only dissent from the use of some things, whose lav.tulness they at present scruple, till si'fficient time and means be usee things, as was necessary to my own practice. I reckoned an unproportionable measure of the short time we liave to live in this world, was not to be taken up about them: that it consisted not with a man's designed progress towaids his end, to be always, or too long, inquiring about his way : that disputes of that kind have little savour in them, compared with the great, agreed matters of our faith and hope. I was loth to disquiet others, or cast stumbling-blocks before them, who seemed as well satisfied, in their way, as I was in mine. I observed such altercations seldom better men's spirits, but that often they make them worse. I had a great reve- rence for divers that differed from me in these things: I knew several of them to be much superior to me, in all sorts of more valuable knowledge ; as also I did of them that therein agreed with me. Comparisons I thought odious and vain. I could not be ol' every worthy and good man's mind, when they were not all of the same mind. I had enough, I thought, to satisfy myself in refer- ence to my own practice, not enough to change theirs; or enable me to set up to be a decider of such controversies. It was remote from me to think sincere religion, either con- fined to any party, distinguished by these little things, or excluded from any. That the kingdom of God consisted not in them, but in righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. I have thought, that as things that were most necessary were most plain ; so things that were so very little plain were the less necessary. Those particles of matter must have very little of real entity in them, that escape theacies, and discerning, of the finest and quickest eye. I have hardly known any point in metaphysics or scholastic divinity, disputed with greater niceness and sub- tlety, than our controversy about the ceremonies; and though I never thought myself to be any of the quickest in the art of disputing, yet I think, taking which side I will in this disputation, I could easily puzzle the most, of plain people, and that are but of an ordinary understanding, about them; much more easily than I could convince, or satisfy them, (or perhaps, did myself,) the one way, or the other. The matter were indeed easy, if (for instance) in a select gathered church (of one or other whereof I suppose you are) one conscience, or a few men's, would serve for the whole body ; or by parity of cases, of a whole parish or nation. But when we consider, that every one must give an account of himself to God; and that in matters which concern our own duty Godward, we are no more capable of having it done by another for us, than (as a noted per- son in our time aptly speaks) of being represented by another in the day of judgment ; this will bring the matter with weight, upon our spirits, lest we should be found transgressors in Bethel, and to have offered strange fire, in- stead of a sacrifice, on the one hand ; or needlessly, on the other hand, set on fire the temple itself. This will, in God's time, I doubt not, be considered by such as can make the occasion cease, of such difficulties. In the mean time, it is of great consolation to those that sincerely fear God, that if with upright minds they principally study to approve themselves to him, and if they mistake, do only err for fear of erring ; he will not Math severity animad- vert upon the infirmity of a weak and merely misguided judgment. It is a most sure truth, and worth all this world, that to an honest unbiassed heart, 'tis a far easier thing to please God, than men. — I have also considered, that some that can contend fervently, and conclude positively, concerning church power, where it is lodged, and how far it can ex- tend, in making rules, and inflicting censures, discover too often more confidence than knowledge and solid judgment, in those very things themselves ; but much oftener, little of the Spirit of Christ and the Gospel ; little of that meek- ness, humility, charity, that are most essential, and inward to true Christianity; and are too apt to magnify the tithing of mint, annis and cummin, above faith, mercy, and the love of God. — I have sometimes thought that to be some- what instructive, which is storied of Plato,i' that having one in his academy that had great skill in driving a chariot, wilh that exactness, as not to swerve one jot from the b 5:1. Var. Hist. 16 lines on which the wheels were, verj' swiftly to move ; nor could be satisfied till he had prevailed with that great man to be the spectator of his performance herein, he was so far from applaud mg him, that turning away with con- tempt, he said, "they that mind, -with such exactness, little things, will never mind great." — I detract nothing from the exact care that ought to be had in observing God's own revelations and injunctions, if j^ou understand aright under what notion, anil for what ends, he intended them. Nothing is to be thought little in religion, that truly be- longs to it. But, Sir, if you should take upon you to de- vise rules and measures of your own and then put a sacredness upon them ; j'ea more, insist to have them observed with greater strictness, and for more distinguish- ing purposes, than ever God intended divers of his own revelations for ; tliis I must tell you were bold, and extra- vagant. And how you are concerned herein, we shall see in the progress of this discourse. To come somewhat closer to you therefore, Mr. Prefa- cer, I shall first consider how reasonably and justly you offer to engage me in this quarrel ; and this will lead me on to take a view of your treatment of that honorable per- son, against whom your quarrel is more principally meanf- As to your endeavour to involve me in this affair, 1 iniik' before you had offered at it, you should have been well assured of these two things ; at least of the one or the ol^vr of them: 1. That I really did concern myself to advise, one way or other, as to the lawfulness or unlawfulness of that occasional conformity, about which you contend. 2. That I ought to have done so. If neither of these can be made to appear, I cannot but think it was a distemper of mind, an immoderate scripturiency, or what shall I call it 1 too great an affectation of intermeddling beyond any call you had, that could lead you to it. And whereas you think you have not exceeded, herein, the rules of charity or good manners ; as to the point of manners, I will not take upon me to be your judge; I believe you guess me to be no master of ceremonies. But as to the much greater busi- ness of chanty, I must tal'K with you more about that be- fore we part. For it is a matter of much greater compa.ss. And in your measures and exercise whereof the generality of serious Christians are concerned as well as I. But as concerning myself, can }'0U make either of these appear! 1. As to the former, I am sure yon cannot, nor any man. Nor ought you to have presumed it, unless j'ou had been sure of the 2nd, That I ought. I, for my part, judged I ought not. Whether I did truly judge or no, that leads into the main cause, that will lie between us, wherein I shall be no less cautious tfian you, though therein I shall not so far compliment you, as to pretend I more follow your example in it, than my own inclination ; i. e. I shall not undertake to determine, whether the action (as circum- stanced) of that honourable personage you principally re- flect upon, were lawful or unlawful. This I meddle" not with ; and you pretend to decline it too ; (either j'ou, or the author you recommend and follow, which is all one to me ;) viz. the question, whether this or that commiuiion be law- ful or unlawful ; but are so little true to that pretence, as to judge that person who occasionally partakes in the le- gally established church's communion, unfit, ever after, to be received, otherwise than as a penitent, to any other Christian communion. And I think no man is to do the part of a penitent, hut for what was unlawful, or a fault. Now I, for my part, shall not take so much upon me as to determine, not being called, if I were never so compe- tent, whether there were anything faulty in that action or no. But in this I am neither in doubt, nor without a suffi- cient occasion to declare, that I can judge it no such fault (if it be one) as should exclude one, that in all other re- spects appears a serious and an orderly Christian, from any other Christian communion, to which he may have thought fit to adjoin himself And that I may se"t in view the ground for my not judging otherwise, and for the follow- ing discourse, we must distinguish, I. Of the obligation of precepts negative, and affirma- tive, or against sins, and unto duties, r/~. against or unto, such things, as, bv those precepts, become sins or duties. And of these, I shall speak only so far, as concerns our present purpose,!, e. as they are" to come under considera- 183 CONSIDERATION ON A PREFACE. tion in foroecclesia, or in a visible church of Christ. And so, there are sins consistent with the Christian state. And vhere are sins inconsistent with it ; or destructive of it. Duties that are matter of simple pTecept, and duties that are also conditions of Christian communion. We are also to distinguish the obligation of negative and affirm- ative precepts, as 'tis usual and common, viz. that the for- mer bind (unless the precept were repealed) semper, et ad semper, always, and to every point of time. The latter, always, while the precept stands in force, but not to every point of time. Of this we shall make the proper use, in the lit place. 2. Of the different notions under which, or causes for which, men of different sentiments or persuasions may decline the communion of this or that church : viz. Some may decline the communion of this or that church, as judging it essentially defective ; so as not to have in it the essentials of a Christian church. (Whether that judgment be right or wrong, true or false, is not now the question ; or under our present consideration.) Others may decline it, as judging it defective in respect of some accidentals, or circumstances; either simply considered, or compared with some other Christian church, that they may appre- hend to come nearer the Christian rule ; and wherein the administration of Christ's ordinances may be more profit- able, and tend more to their advantage and benefit, in their spiritual concernments. These distinctions we shall consider severally, both by way of explication and application to the present case. 1. For the former, when we speak of sins consistent or inconsistent with the Christian state; of duties that are merely such ; or that also are required as necessary to Christian communion; we intend the distinction as refer- ring to visible Christianity. And mean, that as there are sins inconsistent with visible Christianity : avowed atheism, open idolatry, infidelity, apostacy, total, or in respect of some or other known fundamental or Christian religion ; contumacious and continuing rebellion against the autho- rity and known laws of Christ; which, without visibly serious repentance and reformation, slur and deface a man's character, as a visible Christian : so there may be faults that do it not ; which may yet come under common notice, or view. I only instance in what is more agreeable to our present case, as misjudging in some circumstantial matters, and very disputable, that are extra-essential to the substance of Christianity ; and practising according to that erring and mistaken judgment ; even though the mis- take be continued, never discerned, and never repented of or reformed as long as one lives. Such were the differences in judgment and practice about meats and days, Rom. xiv. 2, &c. wherein there could not but be right and wrong. Both sides could not be in the right, i. e. referring their practice to their judgment. The question being, whether such and such things were lawful or unlawful, and that the one side judged them lawful, the other, unlawful. The one side must be in the wrong. The things about which they differed, could not be both lawful and unlawful. It must be sin to judge and do amiss ; duty, to judge aright, and practice accordingly. And what was now to be done in this easel Were they to excommunicate, and curse, and damn one another! Some that presided in the Christian church did, 'tis true, in process of time, come to use an unchristian severity in such cases. As when some tied themselves to the eating of herbs only, and abstained from flesh (whether they de- rived their opinion from the school of Pythagoras, or how- ever they came by it, matters not.) And it was determined concerning them, (I could show where and when were it needful,) that if they would use abstinence, upon other considerations, they might; but if upon a judgment, or opinion, that the eating of flesh was unlawful, they should be excommunicated. And this was thought a sufficient reason for that hard censure, because they denied Christ to have given that liberty, as tomcats, which he had really given. But was this according to the mind of God 1 No, quite contrary ; we see it otherwise determined by apos- tolical authority. Him that is weak in the faith, receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations, Rom. xiv. 1. The case follows. The charge is, Receive them, take them into yx>ur communion, and dispute not his doubting judgment with him, or pass you no judgment upon it, so as to vex or disquiet him with iL Let him alone with his judg- ment and practice together ; but receive him. And the forementioned rigour, we find to have been corrected in after-time. And the like charges are elsewhere given in reference to the differences between the Jewish and the Gentile Christians, the circumcised and the uncircumcised ; i. e. that in the Christian state, no distinction was to be made of Jews or Greeks, circumcision or uncircumcision, them that used or disused the Jewish rites and ceremonies ; but all were to be esteemed as one in Christ Jesus, or Christ to be all in all among them. Gal. iii. 28. Col. iii. 11. i. e. God makes no difference, supposing they be good men, sincere Christians, or become new creatures ; he stands neither upon their being circumcised, or uncircumcised, Gal. vi. 15. Retaining or quitting the subsequent judaical observances ; so tenderly, and by so gentle a hand, did the Divine wisdom and goodness draw off the judaizing Chris- tians from those things, whereof he designed the total abolition ; whereof they had more pretence to be tenacious, being things enjoined by God himself. Therefore God treats them with more indulgence. And what example should we rather choose to follow 1 especially, what indul- gence doth the case itself challenge, in not pressing, under penalty, what there can be no pretence of divine authority for 1 And we find this is the measure according to which we are to go, in receiving persons into our communion. We are to receive such as we have reason to think God receives ; in the forecited, Rom. xiv. 3. Do not judge, but receive him, for God hath received him. There are therefore two plain rules, laid down by that great apostle, in reference to such dubious and small mat- ters ; viz. one concerning such scrupulous persons them- selves, that they be fully persuaded in their own minds, (ver. 5.) and do nothing against the judgment of their own consciences, in those matters ; which he enforces, verse 23. The other concerning the carriage of fellow Chris- tians tovva-i-ds them, that they judge them not, but receive them, verse 1, 2, 3 — 10. Whereupon Mr. Prefacer, I con- ceive myself clear in not judging. And you will be clear in judging, if not only you are an abler judge, (which I will never dispute with you,) but also, that you were called to judge ; and that your judgment is most assuredly true. If God have authorized you, and revealed to you, not only what was right or wrong, in the case itself, but the secrets of his heart, whom you judge ; and that he prac- tised what he thought to be wrong : i. e. that he is a hypo- crite, and that he hath, against his conscience, yielded to do that for (an unprofitable) preferment, probably to his great loss, (as some have found it,) which he himself thought unlawful ; if you know him to be of so vam and light a mind, that not for any real advantage, but for a little temporary, evanid honour and gayety,he hath offered this violence to the judgment of his own conscience ; if God revealed this to you, and charged you to proclaim it to the world ; then hath he indeed set you over him, and far above him ; placed you in a much higher seat of judicature, than that wherein he is seated ; dignified you with an authority superior to what he ever conferred upon any apostle, or on the whole Christian church, or on any, besides his own Son. But if there be nothing of all this; then, though your judgment should happen to be true, yet if it were without any ground, upon which you could know it to be true; and so it were only right by chance : if it were without call ; if you had nothing to do with the matter ; if it come among the exempted cases reserved by the great God to his o%vn tribunal, and which he hath subjected to no ecclesiastical nor human cognizance; being, as to the matter itself, very minute, not so much as a doubtful ac- tion; but the circumstance of an action, and that touches not any vital of religion ; as to the lawfulness of that cir- cumstance, disputable ; a ceremony ; one of them, that were not less disputed, by men of excellent wisdom, and piety on both sides, than the Jewish ones, in the time when they were matter of controversy to the Christian church : and after all that di.sputation, determinable, for aught I know, chiefly, by the majus or minus btmum ecclesia ; as in the time when that Jewish rite of circumcision was the occa- sion of so much disquiet to the primitive Christians, St. RELATING TO OCCASIONAL CONFORMITY. 183 Paul circumcised Timothy, for the greater service of the Christian interest; and being, as to the inward intention, motive, and inducement, secret, and liable only to the Divine view; then, I say, upon all this, even siipposmg the thing you censure were faulty, yet it is no such fault as can slur the character of a man, otherwise appearing a serious Christian. If the contrary were duty, 'tis no such duty as is necessary to entitle a man to any Christian com- munion. Yea, and I add, your censuring it, as you do, is a thousand-fold (even unconceivably) more faulty. And if you could truly say, as Diogenes did, trampling upon Plato's rich bed, calco Platonisfastum, I tread upon Plato'' s pride, it might more justly be replied, as the latter did reply, sed majori fastu, bid you do it ivith greater pride. You take upon you to invade the throne of the Most High ; and may take that as said to you, Who art thou that judg- est another's servant T Why dost thou judge thy brother"? We must all stand before the judgment-seat of Christ, Rom. xiv. 4 — 10. And I wonder you did not dread those awful words, of that very Judge, Matt. vii. 1. Judge not that ye be not judged. And shall more wonder, if yet you perceive not, when you thought a mote was in ano- ther's eye, that there was a beam in your own, as verse 3. A thing that among heathens ■= has been animadverted on with just severity. Nor shall I recharge you in the fol- lowing words, Thou hypocrite, (for I know not your heart in this matter,) but I would have 5'ou re-consider, with how little warrant you have broadly charged that worthy person your quarrel is about, with hypocrisy ; that he acted against his own conscience, because he acted not accord- ing to yours: as if yours were to be the standard, and the conscience-general to mankind ! But that you may appre- hend it not impossible for a man to follow the dictate of conscience, and perhaps as good a one as yours, though he do not follow yours; I shall yet have recourse to a second distinction, before laid down, viz. between the dif- ferent notions under which, or causes for which, men of different sentiments may decline the communion of this, or that church, viz. some, as thinking it essentially defec- tive — others, as judging it defective in some circumstances only. — Now, Sir, if any man decline the communion of what is (however) vulgarly called a church, as counting it really no church at all, his withdrawing or abstaining from its communion, must be total and constant, he can have no communion with it as a Christian church at all. But if one avoid more ordinary communication with a church, as judging it, though not essentially defective, yet to want or err in some circumstances so considerable, as that he counts another church comes nearer the common Christian rule, the Holy Scriptures ; and finds its admin- istrations more conducing to his spiritual advantage; he may be led, by the judgment of his conscience ; both, sometimes, upon weighty and important reasons, to com- municate with the former, and continue therein, accord- ing as those reasons shall continue urgent upon him ; and yet, sometimes, as the cessant or diminished weight of such reeisons shall allow, to communicate with the other. They that will not admit of this distinction, thus gene- rally proposed, as a ground of such different practice in the general, as is here expressed ; hut judge not only es- sential perfection, but a perfection by the concurrence of all desirable accidents, to be necessary also unto Christian communion, can have no communion with a^y Christian church on earth ; for where is any to be found every way perfect 1 'Tis true, that accidental defects may be more or less, and it requires great accuracy to apply what is here generally said to particular cases; nor shall that be my present business ; I have somewhat else of greater im- portance to do. All that I concern myself for, is only to have it considered, that a man of conscience may, upon the grounds generally mentioned, vary his communion as hath been said, while he keeps himself within the limits of a Christian church, essentially true, and that hath no additions destructive of that essence. And if he mistake in making application hereof to a particular case, it proves him not to be a man of a profligate conscience, or of none at all. He may have arguments so specious, that, suppos- c Cum tua pemdeas ociili.3n Sept. Ekw^c ev diKato(TMt.n 0(pdrianiint, twi Tpr'acJTTi.ii aov xopTacQ^anpiai Cf rroc ovqaai rm' oofai' oov. The vuUrar Latin, B^o autein in ju-stitia apparcho conspecfui tuo, satlnbor cum np-paruerit gloria ttta. Exactly following the Seventy, as doth the Btiuopic. The Chaldee paraphnue disagrees little ; the Arabic As if in all this he had pleaded thus : " Lord, thou hast abundantly indulged those men already, what need they more 1 They have themselves, from thy unregarded boun- ty, their own vast swollen desires sufficiently filled, enough for their own time ; and when they can live no longer in their persons, they may in their posterity, and leave not strangers, but their nmnerous offspring, their heirs. Is it not enough that their avarice be gratified, except their ma- lice be also 1 that they have whatsoever they can conceive desirable for themselves, unless they may also infer what- ever they can think mischievous on me ?" To this descrip- tion of his enemies, he ex ojrposito, subjoins some account of himself in this his closure of the Psalm : As for me. Here he is at his statique point; and, after some appearing discomposure, his spirit returns to a consistency, in con- sideration of his own more happy state, which he opposes and prefers to theirs, in the following respects. Timl they were wicked, he righteous. " I will behold thy face in righteousness." That their happiness was worldly, terrene, such only as did spring from the earth; his heavenly and divine, such as should result from the face and image of God. Theirs present, temporary, compassed within this life; his future, everlasting, to be enjoyed when he should awake. Theirs partial, defective, such as would but grat- ify their bestial part, fill their bellies ; his adequate, com- plete, (the ivSiii^wvia Tov avvBiTov,') such as should satisfy the man. " I shall be satisfied," &c. The variety of rendering this verse (to be seen by com- paring the original and translation noted in the margin*^) need not give us any trouble, the differences not being ol great moment, nor our own reading liable to exception. The word niion about which is the greatest diversity, hath the significancy we here give it, in the second com- mandment, and constantly elsewhere. And then, what more proper English can this text be capable of, than it hath in our Bibles 1 Each word hath its true and genuine import ; and the syntax is suflficiently regular and gram- matical of the whole. Only as to the former, that usual and obvious observation must here have place ; that the a prefixed to |5^x and which with it we read in righteousness, doth often signify among its various acceptations, by or through ; and that not only as denoting instrumentality, but more at large, the place of any medium necessary to the attainment of the end it subserves to ; whence the same use of the Greek v, that answers thereimto, is wont to go for a Hebraism. And as to the latter, the only thing liable to controversy, is whether the gerundf ■i>pr^2 is to be construed with the person speaking, when I awake ; or in my awaking , or with the thing ; the likeness or image spoken of in the awaking of thine image, or when thine image shall awake : and I conceive we need not discuss it, but following our own translation, leave the judgment of it to the ear itself, which, (as Elihu tells us,) trieth words. In the meantime, the rea't, importance of this scrip- ture more calls for discussion than the literal ; concerning which, a threefold inquiry will be necessary tor the settling the subject of the following discourse. — 1. What relation this righteousness must be understood to have to the vision of God's face, and the other consequent blessedness. — 2. What time or state awaking refers to, and — 3. What is intended by the likeness of God. To the first. It is only necessary to say at present, that the already noted import of the preposition? in being supposed most suitable to this text, (as apparently it is,) righteousness must be looked upon in reference to this vision, not as in an idle or merely casual concomitancy, or as an imconcerned circumstance, that hath nothing to do with the business spoken of; but as in a close and intimate connexion therewith ; being, 1. antecedent, 2. conducible, 3. necessary thereto. Nor can I better express its place, and reference to it, generally and in one word, than in saying it qualifies for it; which how It doth, will be more proper to consider hereafter. It mny now suffice to say, those words give us the qualified sub- less ; the SsTiac mistook, it seems, l~i3''Dn for ^^3^D^l and so read that word faith \vhicl\ we read likeness. f HieronymiLS (juStta Hebr.) reads the words exactly as we do: Ego in juntitia vklebofaciern tumii. i»iiplebor. cum evigilaveio, simiHtvdine tva. g pTS3 seems best to be rendered here, by, or through righteousness, as by the condition in which he may e.vpect the return of God's mercies here, or the eter- nal nsion of him hereafter, &c. So the learned Dr. Hammond, AJinot. in loc. quoting also Castellio to the same purpose. Chap. 1. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 193 ject of this blessedness, " I in righteousness," a righteous person as such. To the secand : Taking it for granted, that none will understand this awakening as opposed to natural sleep; in the borrowed or tropical sense, it must be understood to intend either some better state in this life, in comparison whereof the Psalmist reckons his pre- sent state but as a sleep ; or the future state of blessedness in the other life. There have been some who have under- stood it of the former, and thought the Psalmist to speak only of a hoped freedom from his present temporal afflic- tions; but then, that which will be implied, .seems not so specious : that trouble and affliction should be signilied by the necessarily pre-supposed sleep, which sure doth more resemble rest than trouble. I conceive it less exceptionable to refer awaking to the blessed state of saints after this life. For, that saints, at that time when this was writ, had the knowledge of such a state, (indeed a saint not believing a life to come, is a perfect contradiction,) no doubt can be made by any that hath ever so liltle read and compared the Old and New Testament. We are plainly told, that those excellent per- sons mentioned in the famous roll,h lived by that faith, which was the substance of things hoped for, and the evi- dence of things not seen. That of them, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, while they lived in Canaan, yet sought abetter, a heavenly country, confessing themselves pilgrims, and strangers on earth. We know it was the more general belief of the Jews in our Saviour's time. And whence should they have it, but from the Old Testament 1 Thither our iSaviour remits them to search it out, and the way to it. The apostle Saint Paulk gives it as the common faith of the twelve tribes, grounded upon ihe promise made to their forefathers; and thence prudentially he herein states the cause wherein he was now engaged; supposing it would be generally resented, that he should be called in question for avowing (only) so known and received a truth. Sure they were beholden "to these .sacred writings they had then among them, for so common a belief; and since it is out of question, from our Saviour's express words, they do contain the ground of that belief; what cause have we to be so shy of so interpreting scriptures that have a fair as- pect that way % It is, that we can devise to fasten here and there another sense upon divers such 1 I wonder what one text can be mentioned in all the Old Testament to this pur- pose, wherein one may not do so. And what then would be the tendency of this course, but to deny in all the par- ticulars, what, upon so clear evidence, we are in the general forced to admit 1 and to put Moses, and Abraham, and David, in a lower class than Pythagoras, and Socrates, and Plato 1 And I think if would not be easy to find one text in all that part of the Bible, where both the words thereof, and the context, do more fairly comply, than in this, so as not only to admit, but even to invite, that interpretation. For the term awake, about which the present inquiry is, how apt and obvious is the analog}^ between our awaking out of natural sleep, and the holy soul's rising up out of the darkness and torpor of its present state, into the en- livening light of God's presence 1 It is truly said so to awake, at its first quitting these darksome regions, when it lays aside its cumbersome night-vail. It doth so more perfectly, in the joyful morning of the resurrection-day, when mortalitjr is swallowed up in life, and all the yet hovering shadows of it are vanished and fled away. And how knowTi and usual an application this is of the meta- phorical terms of sleeping and awaking in holy writ, I need not tell them who have read the Bible. Nor doth this interpretation less fitly accord to the other contents of this verse : for to what state do the sight of God's face, and satisfaction with his likeness, so fully agree, as to that of future blessedness in the other world ? But then the contexture of discourse in this and the foregoing verse to- gether, seems plainly to determine us to this sense : for what can be more conspicuous in them, than a purposed comparison and opposition of two states of felicity mutually each to other 1 That of the wicked, whom he calls 7«c?i of time, (as the words are rendered byi one, and do literall)- signify,) and whose portion, he tells us, is in this life: and h Heb. ri. 1,9. !3, 14, 15, 16. i Jolin v. 39. k Acts xxvi. & 6. 7. compared with the 8- I Tyno OTioO. Hominee de tempore. Pagnin. the righteous man's, his OAvn ; which he expected not to be till he should awake, i.e. not till after this life. Thirdly. It is farther to be inquired, how we are here to understand the likeness of God ? I doubt not but we are to understand by it, his glor\'. And the only difficulty which it will be necessar)' at present to consider about it, is, whether we are to take it objective!}', or subjectively ; for the glory to be represented to the blessed soul, or the glory to be impressed upon it ; the gloiy which it is to behold, or the glory it shall bear. And 1 conceive the difference is more easily capable of accommodation, than of a strict decision on either part. By /«c€ is undoubtedly meant objective glory, and that in iis most perfect repre- sentation ; the face being, as we know with men, the chief seat of aspectable majesty and beauty. Hence when Moses desires to see God's glory^ though he did vouchsafe some d i - covery of it, yet he tells him his face cannot be seen. Here- upon, therefore, the next expression, thy likeness, might the more plausibly be restrained to subjective glor\-,.soas to denote the image of God now in its most perfect impressiun, on the blessed .soul. But I hat I insist not on. Supposing, therefore, that what is signified by face, be repeated oyer again in this word likeness, yet I conceive the expression is not varied in vain ; but having more to say than only that he expected a stale of future vision, viz. that he assured himself of satisfaction too, another word was thought fit to be used, that might signify also somewhat that must intervene in order to that satisfaction. 'Tis certain the mere objective representation and consequent intuition of the most excellent (even the Divine) glory, cannot satisfy a soul remaining disafl^ected and unsuitable thereunto. It can only satisfy, as being represented ; it forms the soul into the same image, and attempers it to itself, q. d. " I expect hereafter to see the blessed face of God, and to be myself blessed or satisfied by his gloiy, at once appearing to me, and transfusing itself upon me." In short, there- fore, I understand by that term, the glor\' of God a.s trans- forming, or as impressive of itself. If therefore glory, the object of the soul's vision, shall by any be thought to be intended in it, I contend not; supposing only, that the object be taken not materially, or potentially only, for the thing visibly in itself considered : but formally, and in esse actuali objccti, that is, as now, actvally iynprcssing it- self or as connoting such an impression upon the behold- ing soul; for so only is it productive of such a pleasure and satisfaction to it, as must ensue. As in this form of speech, " such a man takes pleasure in knowledge," it is evident knowledge must be taken there both objec- tively, for the things known, and subjectively, for the actual perception of those things ; inasmuch as^ apparently, both must concur to work him delight. So it will appear, to any one that attentively considers it, glory must be taken in that passage,™ "We rejoice in hope of the glory of God." 'Tis divine glory both revealed and received ; his exhibition and communication of it, according to his ivimcnsihr, and our panicipation of it, accordingto our measvrc, that must concur to our eternal satisfaction. Herein the Platonic adage » haih evident truth in it ; Pleasure is here certain- ly made vp of something finite and something infinite, viecting together. 'Tis not (as the philosopher speaks) a ^iooktov, but a KTTiron Ti ; not any thing separate from the soul, but something it possesses, that can make it happy. 'Tis not happy by an incommunicate happiness, nor glorious by an incommunicale irUuy. Indeed, the discovery of such a glorv to an inglorious, unholy soul, must rather torment than satisfv. The future glory of saints is therefore called o a glory to be revealed in them (or into them, as the word signifies.) And in the foregoing words, the apostle assures Christ's fellow-suffiiers, that they shall be glorified toge- ther with him. Surely the notation of that word, the for- mal no'ion of glorification, cannot import so little as only to be a .spcctattir of glory ; it must signify a being made glorious. Nor is the common and true maxim otherwise intelligible, that grace and glory difler only in degree. For certainly it could never enter into the mind of a sober man (though how dangerously some speak, that might possibly haTf m Rom. V ?. n Vohiptiitis srenpititio pst ex hifiniti ct finiti copulatione. o Roni. viii. IS. cis q/Kii. 194 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. II. been so if too much learning had not made them mad, will be animadverted in its p.ace,) that objective glory, and grace in saints, were the same specific (much less the same numerical) thing. 'Tis true, that Scripture often ex- presses the future blessedness, by vision of God. But where that phrase is used to signify it alone, 'tis evident, (as within the lower regions of grace, words of knowledge do often imply ali'ection, and correspondent impressions on the soul) it must be understood of afi'ective transformative vision, such as hath conformity to God most inseparably conjunct with it. And, that we might understand so much, they are elsewhere both expre.ssly mentioned together, as joint ingredients into a saint's blessedness; as in those words so full of clear and rich sense : " When he shall appear, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is." Which text 1 take for a plain comment upon this ; and methinks it should not easily be supposable, they should both speak so near the same words, and not intend the same sense. — You have in both, the same season, "When he shall appear, When I shall awake:" the same i-wiyVc^, The rigAteoMi per- son born of God ; (compare the close of the former chapter with the beginning of this ;) and, " I in righteousness ;" the same vision, " We shall see him as he is, I shall behold his face:" the same assimiiatimi, "We shall be like him ; I shall be satisfied with his likeness" (concerning the x^'^'s or habitude this vision and assimilation mutually have to one another, there will be consideration had in its place.) I therefore conceive neither of these notions of the Divine likeness to exclude the other. If it be inquired, which is principally meant 1 That needs not be determined. If the latter, it supposes the former ; if the former, it infers the latter. Without the first, the other cannot be; without the other, the first cannot satisfy. If any yet disagree to this interpretation of this text, let them affix the doctrine propounded from it, to that other last mentioned, (which only hath not the express mention of a consequent satisfaction, as this hath ; whence, therefore, as being in this respect fuller, my thoughts were pitched upon this.) Only withal let it be considered how much more easy it is to imagine another sense, and suppose it possible, than to disprove this, or evince it impossible. — 5How far probable it is, must be left to the judgment of the indifferent : with whom it may not be insignificant to add, that thus It hath been understood by interpreters (I might adventure to say the generality) of all sorts. However, the iew annexed? (for I neither apprehend the necessity, nor have the present conveniency, of alleging many) will suf- fice to avoid any imputation of singularity or novelty. CHAPTER II. A summarj' proposal of the doctrine contained in tliis scripture. A distri- linlion of it into tliree distinct heads of discourse : viz : 1. The qnaUtied suliji'Ct. 2. The nature. 3. The seasoEi of tlie blessedness here spoken of The tirst of these talcen into consideration where the qualification, righte- ousness, is treated of About whicli is shown, 1. What it is. 2. How it quuUfied. Now the foregoing sense of the words being supposed, it appears that the proper argument of the scripture is, — The blessedness of the righteous in the other life, consisting in the vision and participation of the Divine glory, with the satisfaction that resulteth thence. In which summary ac- count of the doctrine here contained, three general heads of discourse offer tiiemselves to our view : — The subject, the nature, and the season of this blessedness : — Or to p A^itur de re'iirrectione et manifestatione glorise ccplestis. Ruffin in loc— Cum appamerit gloria tua, i. e. gloria resurrectionis. Bed. Comment, in Psalm. . , How the Jews were wont to understand it. may be seen at one view in that of Petnis (iaialinns in loc Duo mi Capnio me hie per prisca.s Judaorum Scripturas osfendere liortaris. et generalem mortnonmi resurrectionem fijtu- ram esse et earn per Me.'siam (actum in, prim.um itaque patet non solum ptrsacrae script urae testimonia venmi etiam per Talmndistarum dicla. Nam illuil quidom, Vfa\. xvii dictum ego injiislilia— &c. sic e.vponunt, et presertim Ral)l>i Aliraham Aven Ezra et Rabbi .Solomo, ifcc. And so he goes on to re- cite their words, De Arcanis Catholicse veritatis. Opponis hpec, iis quae de impiis dixerat. Illi Sapiunt teiTena Saturantur filiis et portionem suam in hac vita ponunt, milii vero contenipta est ha>c vita ; ad futuram festino, ubi non in divitiis, sed in justitia yidebo, non tcrrcna hsec transitura, sed ipsam faciemtuam. nee saturaborin (iliis camis sed cum evi'.'ilavero tua similitudine, sicut. 1 Job. lii. 2. — Cum appamerit, &c. Liith. in PsnI. „ . .,. ... , R"=uigam e mnrtuis — videbo de r>erfecti.93ime sicut es, Similis cro tibt. Jun. and Tremel on Psalm 17. whom it belongs, wherein it consists, and when it shall be enjoyed. FHrst, then, we begin with the consideration of the sub- ject unto whom this blessedness appertains. And we find it expressed in the text, in these only words, " I; in righte- ousness ;" which amounts to as much as, a righteous per- son as such. They represent to us the subject of this bless- edness in its proper qualifications ; wherein our business is to consider his qualification, righteousness, under which notion only he is concerned in the present discourse ; and about which, two things are to be inquired — What it im- ports, and — How it qualifies. First, What it imports. I take righteousness here to be opposed to wickedness in the foregoing verse ; (as was intimated before;) and so understand it in equal latitude, not of particular, but of universal righteousness. That is, not that particular virtue which inclines men to give every one their right, (unless in that every one, you would in- clude also the blessed God himself, the sovereign common Lord of all,) but a universal rectitude of heart and life, comprehending not only equity towards men, but piety towards God also. A conformity to the law in general, in its utmost* extent, adequately opposite to sin, (which is in- deed of larger extent than wickedness; and in what dif- ferent respects righteousness is commensurate to the one and the other, we shall see by and by,) as that is, generally, said to be avofna, ha transgression of the law. Among ■^moralists, such a comprehensive notion of righteousness as is incliLsive of all other virtues, is not unknown. But in Scripture, it is its much more ordinary acceptation. To give instances, were to suppose too much ignorance in the reader ; and to enumerate the passages in which this term is taken in that extensive sense, were too great an unnecessary burden to the writer. It were indeed to tran- scribe a great part of the Bible. How familiar is the op- position of righteous and wicked, and righteous and sinner, in sacred language ! And how fully co-extent righteousness is, in the scripture notion of it, to the whole law of God, that one passage sufficiently discovers ; where 'tis said of Zacharias and Elisabeth, d that they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandm.ents and ordi- nances of the Lord blameless. 'Tis true, indeed, that when the words godliness or holiness are in conjunction with this term, its significancy is divided and shared with them; so as that they signify in that case, conformity to the will of God in the duties of ihe first table, and this is confined to those of the second: otherwise, being put alone, it signifies the whole duty of man, as the other expressions also do in the same case, especially the latter of them. As it seems not to be within the present design of the context to take notice of any imputed wickedness of the opposite sort of persons, other than what was really in them; and whereby they might be fitly characterized; so I conceive, that imputed righteousness is not here meant, lliat is inherent in the person of the Mediator; but that which is truly subjected in a child of God, and descriptive of him. Nor must any ihink it strange, that all the requi- sites to our salvation are not found together in one text of Scripture. The righteousness of him, whom we are to adore as made sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him, hath a much higher sphere, peculiar and appropriate in itself. This of v.'hich we now speak, in its own inferior and subordinate place, is neces- sary also to be both had and understood. It must be un- derstood by viewing it in its rule, in conformity whereto it stands ; which must needs be some law of God. There Mollenis thinks it ought not to be restrained to life eternal, hut saith, some un- dc-stand of the glory, qua nmahuntur pii in \'ita fetema And adds, — etquidem non male In — Ego vero et omncs clecfi tui — pie et juste vivimus in hoc s«- culo, ut aliquando in fiituro sseculovideamus faciem tuam, et easatiemur cum sc a pulvere terrae e\igila\ erimus et reformat! fuerimus ad similitudinem Christi tui. .Srb Muiis'er in notis in loc. Ciuii i-(i ail iiiiauinem tuani conditus resurrexero. Vatablus : though he adds, alii ail rrsurrcrTinncni non reterunt. De liitm-i ^]l.•l■ frlicitate^ait, satiabor quum expergiscnr, i. e. quum resurgam e mortui-i—lSimilitudine tua, hoc est videbo de perfecti.ssime, sicuti es ; et Sinii- lis ero fibi qiuim patefactus Christus glorioso adventu suo. 1 John iii. 2. Fabrit. Cone, in Psal. 17 «lt. Descril)it his verbis Psalmographus beatitudenem a»temam filiorum Dei. Ges- nerus in loc. a 1 John i. 9. x > o . ''1 John iii. 4. c E ■ f5f ci^moavvri avAAr,pdriv ttco' apcr' lart. d Luke i. 5, 6. Chap. II. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS 195 hath been a twofold law given by God to mankind, as the measure of a universal righteousness, the one made for in- nocent, the other for lapsed man ; which are distinguished by the apostle under the names of the 'law of works, and the law of faith. It can never be possible, that any of the apostate sons of Adam should be denominated righteous by the former of these laws, the righteousness thereof con- sisting in a perfect and sinless obedience. The latter there- fore is the only measure and rule of this righteousness, viz. the law of l*aith ; not that part of the gospel-revelation which contains and discovers our duty, what we are to be and do in order to our blessedness ; being, as to the mat- ter of it, the whole moral law, before appertaining to the covenant of works, attempered to the state of fallen sinners, by evangelical mitigations and indulgence, by the super- added precepts of repentance and faith in a Mediator, with all the other duty respecting the Mediator, as such ; and clothed with a new form as it is now taken into the con- stitution of the covenant of grace. This rule, though it be in the whole of it capable of coming under one common notion, as being the standing, obliging law of Christ's me- diatory kingdom ; yet according to the different matter of it, its obligations and annexed sanctions are different. As to its matter, it must be understood to require : 1. The mere being and sincerity of those gracious prin- ciples, with their essential acts (as there is opportunity) expressed therein, in opposition to the nullity and insin- cerity of them. 2. All the possible degrees and improvements of such principles and acts, in opposition to any the least failure or defect. In the former respect, it measures the very essence of this righteousness, and enjoins what concerns the being of the righteous man as such. In the latter, it measures all the super-added degrees of this righteousness, (which relations, where they have a mutable foundation, admit,) enjoining what concerns the perfection of the right- eous man. In the former respect, righteousness is opposed to wickedness, as in that of the Psalmist, fl have kept the ways of the Lord, and have not wickedly departed from my God — therefore hath the Lord recompensed me ac- cording to my righteousness. In the latter to sin, with which the apostle makes unrighteousness co-extent, in these words. If we say we have no sin, we deceive our- selves, &c. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighte- ousness. Accordingly are its sanctions divers. For wherein itenjoins the former of these, the essence of this righteous- ness, in opposition to a total absence thereof, it is consti- tutive of the terms of salvation, and obligeth under the penalty of eternal death. So are faith, repentance, love, subjection, &c. required : "If ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins. He that believeth not is con- demned already. — The wrath of God abideth on him. — hlf ye repent not, ye shall all likewise perish. iRepent, that your sins may be blotted out — Him hath God exalted to be a prince and a Saviour, to give repentance and remission of sins, klf any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be anathema maran-atha. iHe that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me, &c. "'If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife and children, and brethren and sisters, yea, and his own life also, (that is, as the former scripture expounds this, loves them not less than me,) he cannot be my dis- ciple ; i. e. while he remains in that temper of mind he now is of, he must needs be wholly unrelated unto me, and incapable of benefit by me, as well as he is indocible, and not susceptible of my further instructions, neither capable of the precepts or privileges belonging to discipleship. "He is the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey him ; and will come in flaming fire to take vengeance of those that know not God, and obey not his gospel ; who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, &c. W-.ere it is only the sincerity of those several requisites, »bat is under so severe penalty exacted and called for ; ina,smuch as he that is sincerely a believer, a penitent, a lo^^r of God or Christ, an obedient subject, is not capable ol the contrary denomination, and therefore f p."!. xviii. 21, St e Rom. iii. 27. ^ Jolin viii. 24. chap. iii. 18, 26. h Luke xiii 3. 5. • Acts iii. 19. chap. v. 31. k 1 Cor. xvi. 22. not liable, according to the tenor of this law, to be pun- ished as an infidel, an impenitent person, an enemy, a rebel. When it enjoins the latter, viz. all the subsequent duty, through the whole course whereof the already sincere soul must be tending towards perfection ; though it bind not thereto under pain of damnation, further than as such neg- lects and miscarriages may be so gross and continued, as not to consist with sincerity, yet such injunctions are not wholly without penalty; but here it obliges, under less penalties, the hiding of God's face, and other paternal se- verities and castigations. They that thus only offend, "are chastened of the Lord, that they may not be condemned with the world. Their iniquity is visited with the rod, and their transgression with stripes, though loving-kindness be not taken away. — Yea, and while they are short of perfect holiness, their blessedness is imperltect also ; which is to be acknowledged a very grievous penalty, but unconceiv- ably short of w-hat befalls them that are simply unrighte- ous. That it obliges thus diversely, is evident ; for it doth not adjudge unto eternal death without remedy, for 'he least defect ; for then what other law should relieve against the sentence of this 1 or wherein were this a relieving law 1 Yet doth it require perfection, that we Pperfect holiness in the fear of God ; that we be perfect as our Father in heaven is perfect. And otherAvise, did it bind to no other duty than what it makes simply necessary to salvation ; the defects and miscarriages that consist with sincerity were no sins, not being provided against by any law that is of present obligation (unless we will have the law of na- ture to stand by itself as a distinct law, both from that of works, and of grace ; which is not necessary ; but as it did at first belong to the former, so it doth now to the latter, as shall further be shown by an' oy.) For to suppose the law of works in its own proper form and tenor, to be still obliging, is to suppose all under hopeless condemnation, inasmuch as all have sinned. And besides, it should oblige to cast off all regard to Christ, and to seek blessedness without him ; yea, and it should oblige to a natural im- possibility, to a contradiction, to make that not to have been, which hath been ; a sinner to seek happiness by never having sinned. It cannot therefore entirely, in its own form, as it was at first made and laid upon man, be of present and continuing obligation to him. But in what part and respect it is, or is not, comes now more distinctly to be shown. Here know, the law of nature, with fit ad- ditionals, became one formed constitution ; which being violated by the apostacy, became unuseful to the end it was made for, the containing of man within the bounds of such duty as should be conjunct with his ble.sseilness. Therefore was the new constitution of the law of grace made and settled, which alters, adds to, takes from it, re- laxes, or re-enforces it, according as the matter of it, the exigency of man's case, and God's gracious purpose and design, could admit, and did require. For the promise, (implied in the threatening) it ceased ; sin having disobliged the promiser. For the precept, the expressed positive part is plainly abrogated. i For the natural part, as it was not necessary, so nor was it possible it should be so ; its tbunda- tions being more stable than heaven and earth. For the commination, we must understand two things in it : first, that for every transgression, a proportionable punishment must become due : secondly, that this debt be in event exacted; or, that God do actually inflict the deserved penally entirely and fully upon the oft'ending person. The former of these is in the strictest and most proper sense natural, and therefore also unalterable. This dueness arising immediately from the relation of a reasonable crea- ture offending, to his Maker. Whence also it is discern- ible to mere natural light. Pagans are said (Rom. i. 3'2.) to have known the righteous judgment of God, that they who commit such things (as are there mentioned) are worthy of death. And hence was the mention and dread of a Nemesis, and an ti^ifcnv oftfia. a vindictive Deity, and a re- vengeful eye, over them, so frequent with them. " If there- fore (as the learned Grolius speaks') there hail never been a penal law ; yet a human act, having in it.>;elf a pravity, whether intrinsical, from the immutable nature of the thing,- 1 Matt. X. 37. m Luke .viv. 56. n Hfb. v. 9. S Thes. 1, S. 9. &c. o I Cor. >i. Psol. Ixxxix. p 2 Cur. vii. 1. IVIau. v. q 1 Tim. ir. 4. r Dc Satisf. cap. 3. 19G THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. II. or even extrinsical, from the contrary command of God, had deserved punishmem, and that very grievous." Now what an arbitrary constitution did not create, it could not nullify ; but might add strength, and give a confirmation to ii. But now for the latter, that this debt be entirely and fully exacted of the sinner himself; though that be also natural, yet not in the strictest and most proper sense, i. e. it is convenient and agreeable to the nature of the thing ; not what it doth so necessarily require, that it can upon no terms be dispensed with. It is so natural, as that^ the son inherit from his father, which yet may, sometimes, for just causes be ordered otherwise. It is what, if it were done, justice could not but approve ; not what it doth strictly and indispensably require ; or, is a debt which it might exact, but which may, without injustice, upon valu- able considerations be remitted. The former of these, there- fore, the new constitution doth no way infringe or weaken, but confirm and reinforce. The latter it so far dispenses with, as that, for the satisfaction made by the Redeemer, the debt incurred by sin, be remitted to the sinner that truly repents and believes, and continues sincerely (though imperfectly) to obey for the future. So that his after-de- linquencies, consisting with such sincerity, do not actu- ally, or in event, subject him to other penalties, than the paternal rebukes and chastenings before mentioned. But this latter part considerable in the commination, the deter- mination of the full penalty to the very person of the transgressor : it doth not dispense with to others (i. e. of the adult, and of persons in a present natural possibility of understanding the Lawgiver's pleasure herein) than such before described ; but says expressly,' He that be- lieveth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him. That indignation and wrath, tribu- lation and anguish, shall be upon every soul of man that doth evil. Therefore the morally preceptive part of the law of works is not in force as man's rule of duty, considered in con- junction with the promise: that is, it doth not now say to any man, Do this, i. e. perfectly obey without ever hav- ing sinned, that thou may'st live. Both which he was obliged to eye conjunctly; the former as containing the rule ; the other the end, in part, of his obedience. But it is m force even by the new constitution itself, as God's rule of judgment, considered in conjunction with the commina- tion, upon all whom the law of grace relieves not, as not coining up to the terms of it; whom also this supervening law brings under a supervening aggravated condemnation. For where the obligation to obedience is violated, the obli- gation to punishment naturally takes place. We see then how far the law' of works is in force, and how far not. But that so far as it is in force, it is to be looked on as taken into the new constitution of the law of grace, is evident. For it is new modified, and hath received a new mould and stamp by this law : which is now become (so far as it is promulgate) the standing rule of government over the lapsed world. The principal modifying act herein, is dis- pensation. Now this, 'tis true, may be so understood, or may be taken in such a sense, as wherein it will only be- long to the executive part of government : that is, when it is not the act of the same power that made the law ; as where only the execution of a deserved penalty is dispensed with, which may be done, in some cases, by a judge that is only a minister of the law, and not the maker of it; being (as may be supposed) enabled thereto by that law itself, or by an authority annexed to his office ; or by virtue of instructions, which leave to him some latitude of man- aginglhe afTairsof his judicaturein a discretionary way, as present occasions shall dictate. And yet by none of these would any change be made in the laM^ : but this is dispen- sation in a le.ss proper sense. In the proper and more famous sense, dispensation belongs to the legislative part of government, being the act of the same power that made the former law, now dispensed with ; and an act of the same kind, viz. legislation ; the making of a new law that alters the former which it halh relation to: whence it was wont to be reckoned among those things that make a change in a law." And so the case is here. The former law is dispensed with by the making of a new one; which a Grot Iliid. u Vid. Suarez de Legibiis. t John iii. 36. Rom. ii. 8. 9. V Matt. V 22. so alters and changes it in its matter and frame, and more immediate end, as hath been shown: and a changed law is not the same. Nor is it at all strange, that the minatory part of the law of works related to the preceptive, so as with it to constitute the debt of punishment, should be now within the compass of the Redeemer's law. For by this applied and urged on the consciences of sinners, he performs a necessary pre- paratory part of his work for their recovery, riz. the awa- kening, the humbling them ; and reducing them to a just and useful despair of relief and help, otherwise than by his merciful hand and vouchsafement ; and the rendering them hereby capable of his following applications. Cutting or lancing, with other such severities, are as proper and useful a part of the chirurgeon's business, as the applying of healing medicines: nor have they the same design and end for which wounds are inflicted by an enemy, the taking away of life, but the .saving of it. And the matter is out of doubt, that the most rigorous determination of the pen- alty that shall be understood duly belonging to the least sin, hath a place, and doth stand visibly extant to view in the publicly avowed declaration, and among the placita or decretals of the Redeemer. We there read, that who- soever shall say to his brother," fool, shall be in danger of hell-fire : (yea, and that lower degrees of the same kind of sin, do expose to lower degrees of the same kind of pun- ishment, as our Saviour's words must be understood, if we attend the plain meaning of his allusive and borrowed phrase of speech :) *That the wages of sin is death. That as many as are of the works of the law, are under the curse: for it is written. Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things written in the book of the law to do them. And we are told,^ that the Scripture (which is the word uf Christ, and was written not for innocent but lapsed man) hath concluded all under sin. Where also we find what is the true intent and end of this rough and sharp dealing with men, the shutting them up, like sentenced malefac- tors, as in order to execution, (which seems to be the im- port of the word ^here used,) viz. that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe (or to them believing, as the words may be read.) And more- over the Spirit, which breathes not in the law of works, as such, but in the law of grace, performs that operation which belongs to it, as it hath the name of the spirit of bondage, by applying and binding on the sentence of death, as due to the guilty person. Therefore we must understand the Redeemer's consti- tution to have two parts. 1. An assertion and establish- ment of the ancient determined penalty due for every transgression ; and to be certainly inflicted on all such as accept not the following offer of mercy upon the terms prescribed. Whereby the honour and justice of the Cre- ator is salved and vindicated, in reference to that first co- venant made with man. And the case of the sinner is plainly stated before him, that he may have a distinct and right apprehension of it. 2. The grant of pardon and eternal life to those that repent unfeignedly of their sins, and turn to God ; believing in the Mediator, and resigning themselves to his grace and government, to be by him con- ducted, and made acceptable to God in their return, and that continue sincere herein to the end. Whereby the won- derful mercy of God in Christ is demonstrated, and the remedy is provided and ascertained to the, otherwise, lost and hopeless sinner. And these two parts therefore are to be looked on in this constitution, though distinctly, yet not separately. The sinner is, at once, to consider the same penalty as naturally, and by divine sanction, due to him ; but now graciou.sly to be remitted : the same blessedness as justly lost, but mercifully to be restored, with a high improvement. And to own both these jointly, as the voice of the Redeemer in his gospel. Death is due to thee; blessedness forfeited by thy having sinned ; but if thou sincerely repent, believe, and obey for the future, thou art pardoned, and entitled to everlasting life. It therefore now appears, that as the law or dictates of pure nature, comprehended together with other fit addi- tionals, became at first one entire constituti(m aptly suited to the government of man in his innocent state, unto which w Rom vi 23. Gal. iii. 10. X Vers? 22. y avvetycictv. Ibid. Chap. II. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 197 the title did well agree of the law or covenant of works ; so the same natural dictates, transcribed and made express, (because now sullied, and not so legible in the corrupted nature of man,) do, with such allays and additions as the case required, compose and make up the constitution which bears the title of the law or covenant of grace, or the law of faith, or the gospel of Christ, and is only suitable to the state of man lapsed and fallen ; as the measure of that righteousness which he is now to aim at, and aspire unto. The rule of this righteousness therefore being evidently the law of faith, the gospel revelation, wherein it is perceptive of duty; this righteousness can be understood to be no- thing but the impress of the gospel upon a man's heart and life: a conformity in spirit and practice to the revelation of the will of God in Jesus Christ ; a collection of graces exerting themselves in suitable actions and deportments towards God and man ; Christ formed in the soul, or put on ; the new creature in its being and operations ; the truth learned as it is in Jesus, to the putting of!" the old man, and the putting on the new. More distinctly, we may yet see wheiein it lies, upon a premised view of some few things necessary to be fore-known in order thereunto. As, That this righteousness is a renewing righteousness, or the righteousness of one formerly a sinner, a lapsed perishing wretch, who is by it restored into such a state towards God, as he was in before that lapse (in respect of certain great essentials, though as yet his state be not so perfectl}^ good, while he is in his tendency and motion ; and shall, by certain additionals, be unspeak- ably better, when he hath attained the end and rest he is tending to.) That a reasonable creature, yet untainted with sin, could not but have a temper of mind suitable to such apprehensions as these, fiz. That as it was not the author of being to itself, so it ought not principalh' to study the pleasing and serving of itself, but him who gave it being ; that it can no more continue and perfect itself unto blessedness, than it could create itself; and can therefore have no expectation hereof, but from the same author of its being ; and hence, that it must respect and eye the great Grod-, its Creator and Maker, as — the sovereign authority whom it was to fear and obey, and — the sovereign good whom it was to love and enjoy. But because it can per- form no duty to him, without knowing what he will have it to do; nor have any particular expectation of favours from him, without knowing what he will please to bestow; and is therefore obliged to attend to the revelations of his will concerning both these; it is therefore necessary, that he eye him under a notion introductive and subservient to all the operations that are to be exerted towards him, under the two former notions ; i. e. as the eternal never- failing trvth, safely to be depended on, as intending no- thing of deceit in anj' the revelations, whether of his right- eous will, concerning matter of duty to be done; or of his good will, concerning matter of benefit to be expected and enjoyed: That man did apostatize and revolt from God, as considered under these several notions; and re- turns to him, when a holy rectitude is recovered, and he again becomes righteous, considered rmder the same : That it was not agreeable to God's wisdom, truth, and legal justice, to treat with man a sinner in order to his recovery, but through a mediator ; and that therefore he was pleased in wonderful mercy to constitute and appoint his own Son Jesus Christ, God-man, unto that office and undertaking ; that through him, man might return and be reconciled to himself, whom he causelessly forsook ; designing that he shall now become so affected towards himself, through the Mediator ; and firstly therefore towards the Mediator's own person, as he was before, and ought to have been towards himself immediately. Therefore, whereas God was considerable in relation to man, both in his innocency and apostacy, under that fore- mentioned twofold notion of the supreme authority and goodness ; he hath also set up and exalted our Lord Jesus Christ, and represented him to sinners under an answerable twofold notion of a Prince and a Saviour; i. e. a medi- ating Prince and Saviour; to give repentance first, to bow and stoop the hearts of sinners, and reduce them to a sub- ject posture again ; and then by remission of sins to restore iRom. av. IT. a PhiJ. i. 11. 17 I them to favour, and save them from the wrath to come. i Him hath the father clothed with his own authority, and I filled with his grace; requiring sinners to submit them- selves to his ruling power, and commit themselves to his saving mercy ; now both lodged in this his Son : to pay him immediatclij all homage and obedience, and through him idtimo.ldij \o hirnst-lf; from him immediately to ex- pect salvation and blessedness, and through him ultimately, from himself. That whereas the spirits of men are not to be wrought to this temper, but by the intervention of a discover^' and revelation of the Divine will to this purpose ; our Lord Jesus Christ is further appointed by the Father to reveal all this his counsel to sinners, and is eminently spoken of in Scripture upon this account, under the notion of the truth ; in which capacity he more effectually recom- mends to sinners both his authority and his grace. So that his threefold (so much celebrated) office of King, Priest, and Prophet, (the distinct parts of his general office as mediator,) which he manages in order to the reducement of lost sinners, exactly correspond (if you consider the more eminent acts and properties of each office) to that threefold notion under which the spirit of man must always have eyed and been .acted towards God, had he never fallen : and hence this righteousness, which consists in conformity to the go.spel, is the former righteousness, which was lost ; with such an accession as is necessary, upon considera- tion that it was lost, and was only to be recovered by a mediator. Therefore you may now take this short and as compen- dious an account as I can give of it, in what follows. Il includes so firm and imderstanding an assent to the truth of the whole gospel revelation, as that the soul is thereby brought, through the power of the Holy Ghost, sensibly to apprehend its former di.sobedience to God, and distance from him, the reasonableness of subjection to him, and de- sirableness of blessedness in him; the necessity of a Re- deemer to reconcile and recover it to God ; the accomplish- ments and designation of the Lord Jesus Christ to that purpose : and hence, a penitent and complaccntial return to God, as the supreme authority and sovereign good, an humble and jovful acceptance of our Lord Jesus Christ, as its Prince and Saviour, with submission to his authoritj^, and reliance on his grace; (the exercise of both which are founded in his blood;) looking and pitching upon him, as the only medium, through which he and his duties can please God, or God and'his mercies approach him; and through wliich he hath the confidence lo venture upon a covenant acceptance of God, and surrender of himself to him, afterward pursued to his uttermost, by a continiied course of living in his fear and love, in obedience to him, and communion with him through the Mediator; always, while he is passing the time of his pilgrimage in this world, groaning under remaining sin, and pressing after perfect holiness ; with an earnest expectation (animating him to a persevering patience through all difficulties) of a blessed eternity in the other world. That such a conformity to the gospel'should be expressed by the name of righteousness, cannot seem strange to such as acquaint themselves with the language of the Scripture. That gracious frame which the gospel (made effectual) impresses upon the soul, is the kingdom of God, in the passive notion of it, his kingdom received, and now actually come with power upon our spirits. And this kingdom (sometimes also by an am s}-nec- doche called judgment in the same notion) is .said to con^ sist in righteousness ; whence then result also,^ peace and joy in the Holy Ghost. The same holy impressions and consequent operations are mentioned by the apostle under the name of^* fruits of righteousness, wherewith he prays his Philippians might be filled. It was Elvmas's opposi- tion to the gospel, that stigmatized him with that brand, " Thou enemy of all righteousness." To yield ourselves servants to righteousness, in opposition to a former servi- tude to sin, is"b obeying from the heart the doctrine of the o-ospel into the type or mould whereof we have been cast or delivered. And sure, both the seal and the impression, God's revelation and holiness, (however now more explicit and distinctlv conspicuous in all their parts.) are the same, with us substantiallv, and in David's time: whence wa need make no difficiilty to own this latter, when we meet b Rom. \i. 17. 199 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. III. with it, as here, under the same name. By what hath hitherto been said, it may be already seen in part, how exactly this righteousness corresponds to the blessedness for which it qualities; whereof we shall have occasioa hereafter to take further notice. ■ In the meantime, it will be requisite to show, which was promised to be done in the next place. How it qualifies. To which I say (very briefly) that it qualifies for this blessedness two ways : 1. Legally, or in gencre Morali, as it describes the per- sons, who by the gospel-grant have, alone, title thereunto. — <= The righteous into life eternal.— The imrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Say to the righteous it shall be well with them. The righteousness of the righte- ous shall be upon him. — In his righteousness he shall live. In which last words, how this righteousness conduceth to life, is expressed by the same preposition as in the text. In this kind it is not at all casual of this blessedness, but 'tis that which the free, and wise, and holy Law-giver thought meet, by his settled constitution, (besides what necessity there is of it, upon another account,) to make requisite thereto. The conformity of our Lord Jesus Christ to that severer law, under which he is said to have been made, is that which alone causes, merits, purchases, this blessed- ness ; which yet is to be enjoyed, not by all indiscrhnina- tim, or without distinction, but by such alone, as come up to the terms of the gospel ; as he did fully satisfy the strict exactions of that other rigid law, by doing and suffer- ing for their sakes. 2. Naturally, or in gencre Physico. In this kind it may be said to be some way casual, that is, to be a ca.usa male- rialis disposiliva, by a proper positive influence, disposing the siibject unto this blessedness; which that it shall, yet, enjoy, is wholly to be resolved into the Divine good plea- sure ; but it is put by this holy rectitude in that temper and posture that it may enjoy it, through the Lord's gracious vouchsafement ; when without it, 'twere naturally impossi- ble that any should. An unrighteous impure soul, is in a natural indisposition to see God, or be blessed in him. That depraved temper averts it from him ; the steady bent of its will is set another way, and 'tis a contradiction that any {in sensu composiio) should be happy against their wills, i. e. while that aversion of will yet remains. The un- righteous banish themselves from God, they shun and hate his presence. Light and darkness cannot have communion. The sun doth but shine, continue to be itself, and the dark- ness vanishes, and is fled awa}'. When God hath so de- termined, that only the pure in heart shall see him ; that \vithout holiness none shall ; he lays no other law upon unholy souls, than what their own impure nature lay upon themselves. If therefore it should be inquired, Why may not the unrighteous be subjects of this blessedness, see God, and be satisfied with his likeness, as well as the righteous 1 the question must be so answered, as if it were inquired. Why doth the wood admit the fire to pass upon it, suffer its flames to insinuate themselves till they have introduced its proper form, and turned it into their own likeness ; but we see water doth not so, but violently re- sists its first approaches, and declines all commerce with it 7 The natures of these agree not. And is not the con- trariety here as great 1 We have then the qualified subject of this blessedness, and are next to consider this blessed- ness itself. CHAPTER III. The nature of this blessedness, propoundetl unto consideration, in the three ingredients (here mentioned) whereof it consists. 1. Vision of God's face. 2. Assimilation to him. 3. The satisfaction resulting thence. These pro- pounded to be considered, 1. Absolutely and singly each by itself. 2. Rela- tively, in their mutual respects to each other. The first of these, Vision of God's face, discoursed of I. The object. 2. The act. Now for the nature of this blessedness, or the inquir}^ wherein it lies, so far as the text gives us any account of it, we are invited to tuiTi our thoughts and discourse to it. And we have it here represented to us in all the particulars that can be supposed to have any nearer interest in the r Matt. XXV. 1 Cor vi. Isa. iii. Ezek. x\iii. d Numb, xli 8. Etseh i. 28. Exod. xxiiv. xxxv &c. business of blessedness, or to be more intimate and intrin- sical thereimto. For (the beatific object supposed) what more can be necessary to actual, complete, formal blessed- ness, than the sight of it, an adaptation or assimilation to it, (which is nothing else but its being actually communi- cated and imparted to the soul, its being united and made as it were one with it,) and the complacential fruition the soul hath of it so communicated, or having so transformed it into itself. And these three are manifestly contained in the text: (the beatific object being involved with them :) the first in the former cause, " I shall behold thy face;" the second and third in the latter, " I shall be satisfied with thy likeness ;" where, being made like to God hath been discovered to be supposed ; and the satisfaction, the pleasant contentful re- lishes consequent thereto, plainly expressed. We shall therefore have stated the entire nature of this blessedness in the handling of these three things ; — vision of the face of God, — participation of his likeness, and — satisfaction therein. And I shall choose to consider them, 1. Absolutely, and singly, each by itself. 2. Relatively, in the mutual respects (by way of influence and dependence) they may be found to have towards each other. Therefore first, in the absolute consideration of them severally, we begin with. First, the \ision of God's face, where — the object, the face of God, and — the act of seeing and beholding it, are distinctly to be spoken to. 1. The face of God, the object of this vision, -w^hich is his glory represented, offered to view. And this object or exhibited glory is twofold: — 1. Sensible, such as shall incur and gratify (after the resurrection) the bodily eye — 2. Intellectual, or intelligible; that spiritual glory that only comes under the view and contemplation of the glo- rified mind. 1. A sensible glory (to begin with what is lower) is fitly in our way to be taken notice of, and may well be comprehended (as its less principal intendment) within the significancy of the expression; the face of God. So in- deed it doth evidently signify, Exod. xxxiii. 11. And if we look to the notation of the word, and its frequent use as applied to God, it may commodiously enough, and will often, be found to signify, in a larger and more extended sense, any aspect or appearance of God. And though it may be understood, ver. 23. of that chapter, to signify an overcoming spiritual glory, as the principal thing there intended, such as no soul dwelling in flesh could behold, without rending the vail, and breaking all to pieces; yet, even there also, may such a degree of sensible glory be secondarily intended, as it was not consistent with a state of mortality to be able to bear. And supposing the other expression, " Thy likeness," to signify, in any part, the objective glory saints are to behold ; it is veiy capable of being extended so far, as to take in a sensible appearance of glory also, which it doth in these words,d " The similitude of the Lord shall he behold:" yet even that glory also was transformative and impressive of itself: Moses so long conversed with it, till he became incapable, for the present, of converse with men, as you know the storj' relates. Such a glory as this, though it belong not to the being of God, yet it may be some umbrage of him, a more sha- dowy representation, as a man's garments are of the man, which is the allusion in that of the Psalmist,* Thou art clothed with majesty and honour : Thou coverest thyself with light as with a garment. And inasmuch as that spi- ritual body (f the house not made with hands) wherewith the blessed are to be clothed upon, must then be under- stood to have its proper sensitive? powers and organs refined to that degree, as may be agreeable to a state of glory ; so must these have their suitable objects to con- verse with. A faculty without an object, is not possible in nature, and is altogether inconsistent with a state of blessedness. The bodies of saints will beh raised in glory, fashioned like Christ's glorious body; must bear the image of the heavenly; and this will connaturalize them to a region of glory, render a surrounding sensible glory necessary and natural to them, their own element : they e Psal. civ. 1, 2. f 2 Cor. v. 1. g Cuilibet potentifp acti\-ip respon- det passiva, sive objcctiva. h i Cor. w. 43. Phil. iii. 21. Chap. III. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 199 will, as it were, not be able to live but amidst such a glory. Place is conservative of the body placed in it, by its suitableness there. Indeed every created being (inas- much as it is not self-sufficient, and is obliged to feich in continual refreshings from without) must always have somevi^hal suitable to itself to converse with, or it presently languishes. By such a harmony of actives and passives, the world consists and holds logether. The least defect thereof then, is least of all supposablein the state of bless- edness. The rays of such a glory have often shone down into this lower world. Such a glory we know showed itself upon the Mount Sinai ; afterwards often about the taber- nacle, and in the temple ; such a glory appeared at our Saviour's birth, baptism, and transfiguration ; and will do at his expected appearance ; which leaves it no miimagin- able thing to us, and shows how facile it is to God to (do that which will then be, in some sort, necessary) create a glory meet for the entertainment and gratification of any such faculty, as he shall then continue in being. But, 2. The intellectual glory, that which perfected spirits shall eternally please themselves to behold, calls for our more especial consideration.! This is the glory that ex- celleth, hyperbolical glory, as that expression imports; .such, as in comparison whereof, the other is said to be no glory : as the apostle speaks, comparing the glory of the legal with that of the evangelical dispensation ; M'here the former was, we must remember, chiefly a sensible glory, the glory that shone upon Mount Sinai ; the latter a purely spiritual glory ; and surely, if the mere preludes of this glory, the primordia, the beginnings of it, the glory — yet shining but through a glass, (as he there also speaks of this glory,) were so hyperbolicaliy glorious, what will it be in its highest exaltation, in its perfected state Ik The apostle cannot speak of that, but with hyperbole upon hyperbole in the next chapter. As though he would heap up words as high as heaven to reach it, and give a just account of it. Things are as their next originals. This glory more im- mediately rays forth from God, and more nearly represents him. 'Tis his more genuine production. He is styled thei Father of glory : every thing that is glorious issome way like him, and bears his image. But he is as well the" i VKcnBaWovBiqi So^rji. 2Cor. iii. 10. k Ka9' V!Tcpl3o\r\v eis virepP >\r]ti. 2 Cor. iv. 17. 1 Uph. i. m Heh. xii. n Not being willing to trouWe a discourse wholly of another nature and de- sign with any thing of controversy, I have chosen only to annex a marginal di- pression, wherein somewhat to animadvert upon tlie over-bold disputes and de- finitions of the scholastic generation, touching what we have now under con- .<;i(leratiori .Some of whose writings seem the very springs of the putid conceits (there not wanting those, that are ollicions enough to serve the illiterate, in accommodating things of that kind to their genius and language) so greedily imbibed hy mcxlern enthusiasts. 'Tia a question nnich a;.'ilatod among the school-men. Whether the Divine essence be exluliitiii to ilic xipwul' \\v blessed in heaven, in itself immedi- ately, or by the iiiicrvoniiun iif any rn^ated likeness or similitude? Had it been agreed to Pirbi'ai looking within this vail, (the rude attempt whereof, rather rends than draws it aside, and to shut up all discourse of this kind) in a modest awful silence ; or had the adventures some have made been foolish only, not pernicious, this present labour had been sp.ircd. Cut when iiiiii speak oi things above their reach, not to no piirpnsf Imirly. but lo very bad. what they say ought to be considered. The Di\ in, . --( w,-:-. say Ibc Thomists. (and the Scotist-s here disagree not,) is itself iiniiire cap,".hle of ibat intenr.tation / e. It becomes his likeness, his idea, his representation now f.iirii.-d in it. when any such inter\enins likeness or representation is ut- lerlv denied : and Ibatsupposed si>ecies is saiil to be the sinuMe Divine essence itself: and if the Divine e.ssenw itselflK! th.af s|x-cies by which 'tis mtderslood, w ill it np found t'lulty of so pro- foiuidly learned inconsistencies, or to speak ahsurdly atbr surb pnlrims. And what should occasion these men so to involve themselves I caiinnt tind or di- vine uiori- tbiin this, that they were not able to fasten upon anv more tolrralde sense of the word KnQo>i, I Cor. xiii. 12. 1 John iii. 2. but taking,' that in its highest pit eh of significancy, all their arguments are generally levelled at this mark, to prove that no created species can possibly n pn-.^i'iit God sicnti pst, aiid thence infer, that he cannot be seen by any eretitcd species in the glorified state, where he is to be seen sicuti est. But could we rnnlcnt ourselves with a moilest interpretation of these words, and understand them to speak not of a ■parily but of a similitude only, between God's knowledge and ours, nor of an absolute omnimodous similitude, but comparative only ; that is, that comparing our future with our present state, the former shall so fkr excel this, that m comparison thereof it may be said to be a knowing of God as we are known, and as he is ; insomuch as our future know lcdi;c of him shall approach so im- .speakalily nearer to his most perfect knowLdj/e of iis, and the truth of the tli>ng, than our present knowledi'c dolh or can: by such an interiireta- tion we are cast u|(on no such difficulties. For admit that no species can represent God as he is in the highest sense of these words ; yet sure in the same sense wherein he ran lie seen by us as ho is, he may he repre- sented to us as he is. And what can be more frivolous than that fore-recited prehend somewhat of whatsoever he reveals to be m him- self ; yet when all is done, how little a portion do we take up of him I Our thoughts are empty and languid, strait and narrow, such as diminish and limit the Holy One. Yet so far as our apprehensions can correspond to the discovery he aflbrds us of his several excellencies, we have a present view of the Divine glory. Do but strictly and distinctly survey the many pprfections comprehended in his name, then gather them up, and consider how glorious he is ! Conceive one glory resulting from substantial wisdom, goodness, power, truth, justice, holiness, that is, beaming forth from him who is all these by his very es- sence, necessarily, originally, infinitely, eternally, with whatsoever else is truly a perfection. This is the glory blessed souls shall behold for ever. For the excellency of it, 'tis called by way of discrimi- nation, o " The excellent glory." There was glory put upon Christ in the transfiguration; of which, when the apostle speaks, having occasion to rhention withal the glory of heaven itself, from whence the voice came ; he adds to this latter, the distinguishing note of the excellent. He himself was eye-witness of the honour, and majesty, and glory, which the Lord Jesus then received ; but beyond all this, the glory from whence the voice came, was the Pexcellent or stately glory, as the word imports. 'Tis a great intimation how excellent a gloiy this is, that 'tis said to be a glory lyet to be revealed; as if it had been said, whatever appearances of the Divine glories are now offered to your view, there is still somewhat undiscovered, some- what behind the curtain, that will outshine all. You have not seen so much, but you are still to expect unspeakably more. Glory is then to shine in its noon-day strength and vigour : 'tis then in its meridian. Here, the riches of glory are to be displayed, certain trea-sures of glory, the plenitude and magnificence of glory. We are here to .see him as he is; to know him as we are known of him. Certainly, the display of himself, the rays of his discovered excellency, must hold proportion with that vision, and be therefore exceeding glorious. ■" 'Tis the glory Christ had with the Father before the foundations of the world were laid ; into the vision and communion whereof holy souls shall now be taken, according as their capacities can ad- mit : that wherewithal his great achievements and high merits shall be rewarded eternally ; that wherewith he is to be glorified in heaven, in compensation of having glo- rified his Father on earth, and finished the work whereto he was ajtpointed. This cannot but be a most transcendent glory. 'Tis in sum, and in the language of the text, the glory of God's own face, his most aspectdble, conspicuous glory. Whose transforming beams are productive of the glory impressed, the next ingredient into this blessedness, which will presently come to be spoken of, after we have given you some short account of, rensotring to the contrary? "There can be no created representation of God (sicuti est) adequate to the vision the blfcS9«d have of him ; but they see more than any created representation can contain, for they see injinitiim, though not infinite. For how must we understand the infinitum they are said to see? Materially or formally? Must we understand by it him that is infinite oidy, or as he is infiiute? If it be said the latter, that is to say they see infi- nite too If the former only, do not saints on earth see Wz. mentally, which is the Wsion we are speaking oO him who is infinite, in their present slate, where it is acknowledgi'd the knowledge is by species. Vet wouH 1 not hence conclude that the knowledge saints shall have of God hereafter shall be by species; lor my design in all this is hut to discover the vanity (jf too |iositive and definitive conceptions concerning it, beyond the nieusure of (iod's r< \elatinn. and the ducture of clear and unentanglcd reason. All knowle(L'e batli been thoiight to be by assimilation, i. e. by recer\ing the species or iina^'es of the tilings known. So the intellect is not really turned info the things which it understands, hut only receives their siiecics, wherewith It is united so closely, that it is therefore said to be hke to them. Virtuosi of France, confer. 65. One way or other it hath been judged necessary the mind should he furnished with such images of fhe thing it is said to understand ; which therefore some have Ihongbt aninate : others supplied by sense totally : others by a separate i»lc!l)Cli/.i offnis : which some have thought to be God himself: others one common intelligence ; others a particular genius. So indispensably necessary it hath !)eeu reckoned unto intellection, that the office of furnishing llie mind wirh the imasres of the things to Ite understood, should be perfonned by one or other If any clearer exjilication can be given, or better way assigned, of the soul's knowing tilings, it cannot but be welcome to rational men. But I see no necessity or reason it should have a specifically distinct way ot knowing here and in heaven. Much less that we should imagine to our- selves such a one as to that other state, as is altogether unaccountable and capable of no rational explication ; and reckon if nuich more becoming fo be silent, than on pretence of any mysteriousness in the things we discourse of, to talk absurdly and uninfellipibty about them A confessed ignorance in this case is liecoming, fo say with that great apostle. If doth not apficar what «e shall be ; but fo conclude and defuic such matters, is surely ippovciv trap o act ^>p'n>ctv. o 2 Pet. i. 17. p McjtXoJrptn-fjf. q 1 Pet. iv. 13. r .lohn xvii. Chap. IV. THE BLESSED^fESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 201 2. The act of beholding: the vision or intuition itself, by which intervening the impression is made. Glory seems to carry in it a peculiar respect to the visive power ; (wliether corporeal or mental, as it is itself of the one kind or the other;) 'tis something to be contemplated, to be looked upon. And being to transmit an impression and consequent pleasure to another subject, it must necessarily be so, it can neither transform nor satisfy but as it is be- held. And here the sensitive intuition I shall not insist on, as being less intended in the text, and the discourse of it less suitable to such as with a spiritual mind and design set themselves to inquire into the nature of the saints' blessedness. Yet, as this is the most noble, com- prehensive, quick, and sprightly sense, so is the act of it more considerable, in the matter of blessedness, than any other of the outward man, and the most perfect imitation of the act of the mind ; whence also this so often borrows the name of the other, and is called seeing. 'Tis an act indeed very proper and pertinent to a state of glory. By how much more any sensible object is glorious, (supposing the sensorium to be duly disposed and fortified, as must be here supposed,) so much is it the fitter object of sight ; hence when we would express a glorious object, we call it conspicuous ; and the less glorious or more obscure any thing is, the less visible it is, and the nearer it approaches to invisibility; whence that saying in the common phi- losophy,' " To see blackness is to see nothing." What- soever a glorified eye, replenished with a heavenly vitality and vigour, can fetch in from the many glorified objects that encompass it, we must suppose to concur to this bless- edness. Now is the eye satisfied with seeing, which be- fore never could. But 'tis intellectual sight we are chiefly to consider here, that whereby we see him that is invisible, and ap- proach the inaccessible light. tThe word here used, some critics tell us, more usually signifies the sight of the mind. And then, not a casual, superficial glancing at a thing, but contemplation, a studious, designed viewing of a thing when we solemnly compose and apply ourselves thereto; or the vision of prophets, or such as have things discovered to them by divine revelation, (thence called chozim, seers,) which imports (though not a previous design, yet) no less intention of mind in the act itself And so it more fitly expresses that knowledge which we have, not by discourse and reasoning out of one thing from another, but by im- mediate intuition of what is nakedly, and at once, offered to our view, which is the more proper knowledge of the blessed in heaven. They shall have the glory of God so presented, and their minds so enlarged, as to comprehend much at one view; in which respect they may be said, in a great degree, to know as they are known, inasmuch as the blessed God comprehends all things at once, in one simple act of knowing. Yet that is not to be understood as if the state of glory should exclude all ratiocination, more than our present state doth all intuition ; (for firs.' and indemonstrable principles we see by their own lie-'if, with- out illation or argument;) nor can it be inco'^venient to admit, that while the knowledge the blesspj have of God, is not infinite, there may be use of their discursive faculty -with great fruit and pleasure. "Pare intuition of God without anv mixture of reasoni--«g, is ack-nowledged (by such as are apt enough to be over-ascnbmg to the creature) peculiar to God alone. V'^i as the blessed God shall con- tinually aflTord (if we «iay spealf of continuity in eternity, which yet we cannot otherwise apprehend) a clear dis- covery of him?rilf, so shall the principal exercise and fe- licity of the blessed soul consist in that less laborious and more pieasant way of knowing, a mere admitting or enter- taining of those free beams of voluntary light, by a grateful intuition ; which way of knowing, the expression of sight, or beholding, doth most incline to, and that is, we are sure, the ordinary language of Scripture* about this matter. s kxiat. in 3. Meteorolog. Cap. de Iride. tnn. u CoffDoacere Deum clare et intuitive eat proprium ct naturale soli Deo, sicut CHAPTER IV. The second ingredient into this blessedness considered, Assimilation to Gf«l, or his glory imprest. Wherein it consists, discoveredui suwii^'proriositiuiis. riie third infrtdient. Tho satisfaction aiul pleasure wliich r^ulte, staled and opeiieu. And now, upon this vision of the blessed face of God, next follows, in the order of discourse, The soul's perfect assimilation unto that revealed glory, or its participation thereof; (touching the order the things themselves have to one another, there will be consideratioa had in its proper place ;) and this also must be considered as a distinct and necessary ingredient into the state of blessedness we are treating of Distinct it is, for though the vision now spoken of doth include a certain kind of assimilation in it, as all vision doth, being only a reception of the species or likeness of the object seen ; this assimi- lation we are to speak of, is of a very different kind. That, is such as affects only the visive and cognitive power, ajid that not with a real change, biU intentional 5, as the issue itself would he strange 1 Is it not an over-bold desire; too daring a thought; a thing unlawful to be affected, as it seems impossible to be attained "? It must be acknowledged there is an appearance of high arrogance in aspiring to this, to be like God. And the very wish or thought of being so, in all respects, were not to be enter- tained without horror. 'Tis a matter therefore that requites some disquisition and explication, wherein that impressed likeness of God consists, which must concur to the saints' blessedness. In order hereunto then take the foDowing propositions : Prop. 1. There is a sense wherein to be like God j^ altogether impossible, and the ver\- desire of it the mo- horrid wickedness. The prophet" in the name of G bonus ririnceps facieiuio docet. Ciimnue sic imperio max- iiniis, r\cm;.l.) major eself of. Its very spiritual, immortal nature itself, is a representation of his. Its intellective and elective powers are the irr.age of what we are constrained to conceive under the notion of the same powers in him. Yea, the same understanding, with the memory and will, in one soul, are thought a lively resemblance of the » tri- une Deity. But there is further a similitude of him in respect of moral p virtues or perfections answering to may see much of the like import alleged by Natal. Com lib. i p 13 Which (by the way) discovers how flatly opposite the idolatry forbidden in Ae second commandment, is to the light of nature itself Which halh been also iiie iust apology of the ancient patrons of the Christian cause, forthe simplicity of xVeir worsiap in this respect ; and their not Imitating the pompous vanity of pagan image-worship. Ovh Bcias eiKovas vn-o\ap0aiiopev civai ra ayaXpara, arc nopipriv aoparov Oeov Kai aawparov pr) SiaypadiopTtS- Origen contr. Cel- sum lib. 7. ; To which purpose see at large, Min. Felix, ftuod simulacnira Deo fingam ? &c. And surely it is as improvable against the same piece of Christian paganism. The usually assigned diflerenccs would easily be shown to be trifling miperti- nences. m Corpus hominis non animum esse imaginem Dei : Aug. (if it be Augus tine's) hb. de haeresibus. See Dr. Charleton of his image of God in man. n Est Dei similitudo qua-dam, quam nemo vivens, nisi cum vita exuit : quam habct homo et volens, et nolens, «!kc. Bernard, de vita Solitar. o D. Aug. (fuse) lib. 10. de Trinitat. p Sefibili. Aquin Sun. 804 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. V. diversified only by the distance or presence of the same object : which, when 'tis distant, the soul, acted and prompted by love, desires, moves towards it, pursues it; when present and attained, delights in it, enjoys it, stays upon it, satisfies itself in it, according to the measure of goodness it finds there. Desire is therefore love in motion ; delight is love in rest. And of this latter, delight or joy. Scripture evidently gives us the notion ,^ he will rejoice over thee with joy, (unto which is presently added as exe- getical,) he will rest in his love ; which resting can be but the same thing with being satisfied. This satisfaxtion then is nothing else but the repose and rest of the soul amidst infinite delights ; its peaceful acquiescence, having attained the ultimate term of all its motions, beyond which it cares to go no further ; the solace it finds in an ade- quate, full good ; v;hich it accounts enough for it, and beyond which, it desires no more ; reckons its state as good as it can be, and is void of all hovering thoughts, (which perfect rest must needs exclude,) or inclination to change. And so doth this being satisfied, not only generally signify the soul to be at rest; but it specifies that rest ; and gives us a distinct account of the nature of it. As, that it is not a forced, violent rest ; such as proceeds from a beguiled ignorance, a droM'sy sloth, a languishing weakness, or a desire and hope of happiness, by often frustrations baflled into despair, (to all which, the native import and propriety of that Avord satisfaction doth strongly repugn.) But it discovers it to be a natural rest ; I mean, from an internal principle. The soul is not held in its present state of en- joyment by a strong and violent hand ; but rests in it by a connaturalness thereunto ; is attempered to it, by its own inward constitution and frame. It rests not as a descend- ing stone, intercepted by something by the M^ay, that holds and stop.s it ; else it would fall further : but as a thing would rest in its own centre ; with such a rest as the earth is supposed to have in its proper place ; that, being hung upon nothing, is yet unmoved, pondcribus librata suis, equally balanced by Us own weight every tcay. It is a roMonal, judicious rest ; upon certain knowledge that its present state is simply best, and not capable of being changed for abetter. The soul cannot be held un- der a perpetual cheat, so as ahvays to be satisfied with a shadow. It may be so befooled for a while, but if it remain satisfied, in a state that never admits of change, that state must be such, as commends itself to the most thoroughly informed reason and judgment. It is hence a free, voluntary, chosen rest; such as God professes his own to be in ZionV This is my rest, here will I dwell, for I have desired it. It is a comjilaccntial rest, wherein the soul abides steady, bound only tr/ the chords of love ; a rest in the midst of pleasantness ; i-The Lord is my por- tion, the lots are fallen to me in arridnitatibus ; it cannot be more fitly expressed than amidst •pleasantnesses ; and this speaks not only what the Psalmist's condition was, but the sense and account he had of it. That teni-per of mind gives us some idea of that contentful, satisfied aix^de with God, which the blessed shall have. He intimates, how undesirous he was of any change. <=Their sorrows (he told us above) should be multiplied that hasten after anothf god. Hereafter there will be infinitely less appearance of reason for anv such thought. Now, it is the sense of a holy soul, " Whom have I in heaven but thee 1 and there is none I desii'e on earth besides thee :" q. d. Heaven and earth yield not a tempting object, to divert me from thee : 'tis now so, at some times, when faith and love are in their triumph and exaltation (but the Lord knows how seldom !) but mtich more when we see him as he is, and are satisfied with his likeness! It's an active, vigorous rest. Action about the end shall be perpetuated "here, though action towards it ceases. 'Tis the rest of an awakened, not of a drowsy, sluggish soul; of a soul satisfied, by heavenly sensations and fruitions, not incapable of them, or that I Zeph. iii. 17. a Psal. cxxxii. 14. t) Psal. xvi. 8. Q'^n^yn. c Ver. 4. d I think it not worth the while to engage in tlie dispute (so much agitated l)etvvcLMi the Thomi?t3 and Scotists) whether blessedness do formally consist in this sntisfying fniition, or in the antecedent vision ; this satisfaction is cer tainly inseparable from it, and I see not how to be excluded out of its formal notion ; 'tis not vision as vision, but as satisfying, that makes us hapny ; and to talk oftlie satisfaction or pleasure which the understanding hath in knowing 18 uiaipid ; while the soul understanding, i. e. the mind, knows, 'tis the soul finioyinir, i. e. tlie wiU, is pleased and finds content ; and till tlie soul be fully hath its powers bound up by a stupifying sleep. It's the rest of hope, perfected in fruition, not lost in despair ; of satisfied, not defeated, expectation. dDespair may occasion rest to a man's body, but not to his mind ; or a cessation from further endeavours, when they are constantly found vain, but not from trouble and disquiet ; it may suspend from action, but never satisfy. This satisfaction therefore speaks both the reality and nature of the soul's rest in glory; that it rests; and with what kind of rest. CHAPTER V. The relative consideration of these tliree ingredients of the saints' blessedness ; where it is propounded to show particularly, 1. What relation vision hathte assimilation. 2. What both these have to satisfaction. The relation between the two former, inqiiired into. An entrance upon the much larger discourse, what relation and iiiHuence the two former have towards the third : What vision of God's face or glory, contributes towards satisfaction, estimated from the consideration, l. Of the object, the glory to be beheld; as 'tis divine, entire, permanent, appropriate. Thus far have we viewed the parts or necessary concur- rence, of which the blessedness of the saints must be composed absolutely and severally each from other : we proceed. Secondly, To consider them relatively, viz. in the mu- tual respects they bear one to another ; as they actually compose this blessed state. Wherein we shall show par- ticularl}-^ : 1. The relation, by way of influence, and de- pendence, between vision, and assimilation: and — Be- tween both these and the satisfaction that ensues : which latter I intend more to dwell upon • and only to touch the former, as a more speculative ana less improvable sub- ject of discourse, in my way to this. 1. First, It may be considered — What relation there may be between vision of God, and assimilation, or being made like to him ; and it must be acknowledged (according to what is commonly observed of the mutual action of the understanding and will) that the sight of God, and like- ness to him, do mutually contribute each towards other. The sight of God assimilates, makes the soul like unto him ; that likeness more disposes it for a continued re- newed vision. It covild never have attained the beatifical vision of God, had it not been prepared thereto, by a gra- dual previous likeness to him.^ For righteousness (which we have shown qualifies for this blessedness) consists in a likeness to God ; and it could never have been so prepared, had not some knowledge of God introduced that confor- mity and yielding bent of heart towards him. For the entire frame of thcb new man, made after the image of God, is renewed in knowledge. But, as notwithstanding the circular action of the understanding and will upon one another, there must be a beginning of this course some- where, and the understanding is usually reckoned the hycjioviKov, the first mover, the leading faculty : so, notwith- standing the mutual influence of these two upon each other, seeing hath a natural precedency, and must lead the way unto being like ; which is sufficiently intimated in the text, " I shall behold thy face," and then " I shall be satisfied with thy likeness ;" and more fully in that pa- rallel scripture, " We shall be like him, for we shall see him," 6co,. From whence also, and from the very nature of the thii.jr^ "we way fitly state the relation of the first of these to the =^cond, to be that of a cause to its eflect ; sight begets likeness, is antecedent to it, and productive of it. That is, the face or glory of God seen ; that glory in conjunction with our vision of it ; for the vision ope- rates not, but according iq the efficaciousness of the thing seen ; nor can that glory have any such operation, but by the intervention of vision. 'Tis therefore the glory of God seen, as seen, that assimilates, and impresses its likeness contented, it is not blessed ; and it is by being so, when it saith "Now I am fully sati.sfied, I have enough, I desire no more." ' a Which nece.ssity of a iikene,ss to God t/> dispose for the vi.iion of him, is excellently expressed by a Platonic pliilosopher. The Di\ine nature to (isiov, which he saith, is liable to no sense, fiovoM f,c rwi ttjj ij/i)\i?? ),a,\>(s-(tii Ka\ KaQapoiTariM. Kai vocp-.naTMi Kill kovot.ii,h, Kai TrpeofSxnariM op'nrov df ofioiornTa, &c. is yet visible to that in the smd, which is most beavtiful, ?iiost pure, vwst jien^phuimm. most subtmie, most noble, in respect ofacer- tain similitiide and cognation that is betxceen thein. Ma.i Tyr b Col. iii. 10. Chap. V. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS, 205 upon the beholding soul ; and so its causality is that of an objective cause, (which, whether it belong to the eflicient or final, I shall not here dispute) that operates only as it is apprehended: so introducing its own Ibrm and similitude into the subject it works upon. Such a kind of cause were Jacob's streaked rods of the production that ensued : and such a cause is any thing whatever, that begins an impression upon an apprehensive subject, by the mediation and ministry, whether of the fancy or unders-tanding. — This kind of causality the word hath in its renewing, transforming work ; and the sacraments, wherein they are causal of real physical mutations on the subjects of them. So much of the image of God as is here impressed upon souls by gospel -dispensations, so much is impressed of his glory. The work of grace is glory begun. And now, as glory initial, and progressive in this life, enters at the eye ; ((^beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, we are changed ; .so doth perfect and consummate glory in the other life. For we have no reason to imagine to ourselves any alteration in the natural order the powers of the soul have towards each other, by its passing into a state of glory. The object seen, is unspeakably ethcacious; the act of intuition is full of lively vigour ; the subject was prepared and in a disposition before ; and what should hinder, but this glorious effect should immediately ensue 1 as the sun no sooner puts up his head above the hemisphere, but all the vast space, whither it can diffuse its beams, is presently transformed into its likeness, and turned into a region of light. What more can be wanting to cause all the dark- ness of atheism, carnality, and every thing of sin, forever to vanish out of the awakening soul, and an entire frame of holiness to succeed; but one such transforming sight of the face of God 1 One sight of his glorious majesty pre- sently subdues, and works it to a full subjection ; one sight of his purity makes it pure ; one sight of his loveliness turns it into love; and such a sight always remaining, the impress remains always actually (besides that it is in itself most habitual and permanent, in the soul's noAV con- firmed state) fresh and lively. The object hath quite another aspect upon a wicked soul, when it awakes; and the act of seeing is of another kind; therefore no such effect follows. Besides, the subject is otherwise disposed ; and therefore a.s the sun enlightens not the inward parts of an impervious dunghill, but it en- lightens air ; so the sight of God transforms and assimi- lates at last, not a wicked, but it doth a godly, soul. That which here makes the greate.st difference in the temper of the subject is love. I look upt)n the face of a stranger and It moves me not; but upon a friend, and his face presently transforms mine into a lively cheerful aspect. dAs an iron sharpens iron, so doth the face of a man his friend ; puts a sharpness and quickness into his looks. The soul that loves God, opens itself to him, admits his influences and impressions, is easily moulded and wrought to his will, yields to the transforming power of his appearing glory. There is no resistant principle remaining, when the lov:e of God is perfected in it; and so overcoming is the first sight of his glory upon the awaking soul, that it perfects it, and so his likeness, bofh at once. But enmity fortifies the soul against him, as with bars and doors ; averts it from him; carries with it a horrid, guilty consciousness, which fills it with eternal despair and rage, and inwraps it in the blackness of darkness forever. 2. Both the vision of God, and likeness to him, must be considered in their relation to the consequent sa.tisfaclion. and the influence they have in order thereto. I say, both ; for though this satisfaction be not expre.ssly and directlv referred by the letter of the text, to the sight of God's face": yet its relation thereto, in the nature of the thing, issurti ciently apprehensible and obvious ; both mediate, in respect of the influence it hath towards the satisfying assimilation ; and immediate, (which we are now to consider,) a.s it is so highly pleasurable in itself; and is plainly enough intima- ted in the text; being applied, in the same breath, to a thing so immediately and intimately conjunct with this vision, as we find it is. Moreover, supposing that likeness here do (as it hath been granted it may) signify objective c 2 Cor. iu. 18, d prov. xxvii. 17. e Psal. xv\. H. t Acta ii. 38. which indeed is the Seventy's reading of llie PsaUnist's words. glory also, as well a.s subjective, and repeat what is con- tained in the former expression, " the face of God," the re- ference satisfaction hath to this vision (which the re-men- tion of its object, though under a varied lorm ol expres- sion, supposes) will be more express, therefore we shall show, 1. What the vision of the Divine glory contributes to the satisfaction of the blessed soul, and what felicity it inust needs take herein: which caruiot but be very great, whether we respect — the glory seen, the object of this vision ; or — the act of vision, or intuition itself. L The object, the glorj' beheld. What a spring of pleasure is here ! what rivers of pleasures flow hence ! "■In thy presence (saith the Psalmist) is fulness of joy: at thy right hand are pleasures for evermore. The awaking soul, having now passed the path of life, (drawn through Sheol itself, the state of deadly-head,) appears imme- diately in this presence; and what makes this presence so joyous, but the pleasant brightness of this face "? To be in the presence of any one, and before his face, in con- spectu, are equivalent expressions ; therefore the apostle, quoting this passage, renders it thus, fThou hast filled me with gladness, by thy countenance ; now in this glorious presence, or within view of the face of God, is fulne.ss of joy, i. e. joy under satisfaction. And the Apostle Jude, speaking of this presence under this name, (a presence of glory,) tells as of an ' exceeding joy, a jubilation, (an liyiUtao-i?,") that shall attend the presentment of saints there. Tne holy .soul now enters the divine hShechinah, the chamber o. presence of the great King, the habitation of his holiness and glory, the place where his honour dwelleth. Here his glory surrounds it with encircling beams; 'tis beset with glory, therefore surely also filled with joy. When the vail is drawn a-side; or we are within the vail; in that very presence whither Jesus the forerunner is for us entered, (through that path of life,) O the satisfying overcoming pleasure of this sight ! Now that is to us revealed or unvailed glory, which was hid- den before. Here the ^glory set in majesty, (as the expres- sion is, concerning the glory of the temple) is presented to view openly and without umbrage. God is now no longer seen through an obscuring medium. They are not now shadowed glimmerings, transient, oblique glances, but ihe direct beams of full-e3'ed glory, that shine upon us. The discovery of this glory is the uUimate product of that in- finite wisdom and love, th-at have been working from e;er- nity, and for so many thousand years, through all the successions of time, towards the heirs of salvation. The last and complete issue of the great achievements, sharp conflicts, glorious victories, high merits of our mighty Redeemer. All these end in the opening of heaven (the laying of this glory as it were common) to all believers. This is the upshot and close of that great design: will it not, think ye, be a satisfying glory ? The full blessedness of the redeemed, is the Redeemer's reward. He cannot be satisfied in seeing his seed, if they should be unsatisfied. He cannot behold them with content if his heart tell him not, that he hath done well enough for them. tGod wouhl even be ashamed to be called their God. had he not made provision for their entertainment worthy of a God. 'Tis the season of Christ's triumphs, and saints are to enter into his joy. 'Tis the appointed jitbilee, at the finishing of all God's works from the creation of the world, when he shall purposely show himself in his most adorable majesty, and when CTirist shall appear in his own likeness ; (he appeared in another likeness before ;) surely glory must be in its exaltation in that day. But take a more distinct account, how grateful a sight this glory will be, in these following particulars: L It is the Divine glory. Let your hearts dwell a little upon this consideratrLin. 'Tis the glory of God, i. e. the glory which the blessed God both enjoys and affords, which he contemplates in himself, and which rays from him to his saints; 'tis the felicity of the Divine Being. It satisfies a Deity, will it not a worm ? 'Tis a glory that results and shines from him : and in that sense alsi> divine, (which here I mainly intend,) the beauty of his own face, the lustre of divine perfections ; every attribute bears a I Ezck, vii. h Ver 94. k Heb. zi. l •206 THE BLESSEDNESS OP THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. V part, all concur to make up this gloi-y. And here pre- j termitting those which are less liable to our apprehension, ' his eternity, immensity, simplicity, &c. (of which, not having their like in us, we are the more incapable to form distinct conceptions, and consequently of perceiving the pleasure that we may hereafter, upon the removal of other impediments, find in the contemplation of them,) let us bethink ourselves, how admirable and ravishing the glory will be. 1. Of his unsearchable wisdom, which hath glory pe- culiarly annexed and properly belonging to it. Glory is, as it were, by inheritance, due to wisdom. iThe wise shall inherit glory. And here now, the blessed souls behold it in its first seat, and therefore in its prime glory : wisdom, counsel, understanding, are said to be with him; as if no where else. Twice we have the apostle describing glory to God, under the notion of ™only wise ; which is but an acknow>3dging him glorious in this respect. Wisdom, we know, is the proper and most connatural glory of intel- lectual nature ; whether as it relates to speculation, when we call it knowledge; or, action, when 'tis prudence. How pleasant will the contemplation be, of the Divine wisdom, in that former notion ! When in that glass, that speculum alernitatis, we shall have the lively view of all that truth, the knowledge whereof can be any way possible and grateful to our natures ; and in his light, see light ! When all those vast treasures of wisdom and knowledge which already, by their alliance to" Christ, saints are interested in, shall lie open to us ! When the tree of knowledge shall be without enclosure ; and the most voluptuous epicurism, in reference to it, be innocent ! Where there shall neither be lust, nor forbidden fruit ; no withholding of desirable knowledge, nor affectation of undesirable ! When the pleasure of speculation shall be without the toil ; and that maxim be eternall)'^ antiquated, that increased knowledge increases sorrow ! As to the other notion of it ; how can it be less grateful to behold the wisdom that made and governed the world ; that compassed so great designs "^ and this, no longer in its effects, but in itself 1 Those Avorks were honourable and glorious, sought of all them that have pleasure in them. What will be the glory of their cause 1 It would gratify some men's curiosity to behold the unusi;al motion of some rare autcmaton; but an ingenious person would, with much more pleasure, pry into the secret springs of that motion, and observe its inward frame and parts, and their dependence and order to each other. 'Tis come- ly to behold the exterior economy of a well governed peo- ple, when great affairs are, by orderly conduct, brought to happy issues ; but to have been at the helm; to have seen the pertinent, proper application of such and such maxims to the incident cases ; to have >.nown all the reasons of state ; heard debates ; observed with what great sagacity inconveniencies have been foreseen, and with w^hat dili- gence prevented; would much more gratify an inquiring genius. When the records of eternity shall be exposed to view ; all the counsels and results of that profound wisdom looked into : how will it transport ! when it shall be dis- cerned, Lo ! thus were the designs laid ; here were the apt junctures, and admirable dependencies of things ; which, when acted upon the stage of the world, seemed so perplexed and cross, so full of mysterious intricacy ! If St. Paul were so ravished at those more obscure appear- ances of Divine wisdom, which we find him admiring, (Rom. xi. 33.) O the depths, &c. what satisfaction will it yield, to have a perfect model of the deep thoughts and counsels of God presented to open view ! How is the happiness of Solomon's servants magnified, that had the privilege continually to .stand before him, and hear his wisdom ! But this happiness will be proportionably greater, as Solomon's God is greater than he. 2. The glory of his power will add comeliness to the object of this vision. Power duly placed and allayed is lovely. Beauty consists much in a symmetry or proportion of parts. So must there be a concurrence of Divine per- fections, to compose and make up the beautiful complexion of his face ; to give us a right a.spect, the true idea of God : and here his power hath a necessary ingrediency. How 1 Prov. iii 35. Job xii. m Rom. xvi. 27. 1 Tim. i. 17 n Col. ii. 3. o Kparoi rns dJ^m- <"ol. i. 11. P Rom. vi. 4. q Cliap. iii. 16. r Job %xvi. 9. incoherent, and disagreeing with itself, were the notion of an impotent God ! His power gives lively strokes to his glor)'. 'Tis called" glorious power, or the power of glory; yea, 'tis simply called glory itself: the apostle tells usp Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, when 'tis plain he means power. And the same apostle prays on the behalf of the lEphesians, 'that God would grant them according to the riches of his glory to be strengthened with might, &c. How frequently are power and glory ascribed to him in conjunction ! intimating that, as he is powerful, he is glorious. And certainly, even this glory cannot but cast a grateful aspect upon the blessed soul, and be infinitely pleasant to behold. What triumphs doth it now raise in gracious spirits, to behold the " exer- tions of it in his works ; to read its descriptions in his word ; while as yet he holds back the face of his throne ; while the countenance of enthroned majesty cannot be seen ; when so little a portion is heard of him, and the thunder of his = power so little understood ! The infi- nitely fainter rays of this power in a creature ; power in that unspeakable diminution and abatement ; that derived, precarious power; when 'tis innocently used, is observed with pleasure. Here is power in the throne, power in its chief and highest seat ; essential, and self-originated power ; the root and fountain, the very element of power ; power in its proper situation, in its native place, to which it be- longs. t God hath spoken once, twice have I heard this, that power belongeth unto God. It languishes in a crea- ture, as in an alien subject. If I speak of strength, lo, he is strong, " saith Job ; q. d. " Created power is not woTth the speaking of; here is the power that deserves the name, that is so indeed." How satisfying a pleasure will this afford, to contemplate this radical power I this all-creating, all-ruling power, the principle of all action, motion and life, throughout the whole creation ! This wil. be as natural a pleasure, as the child takes in the mother's bosom, and in embracing the womb that bare it. How grateful to behold whence the vast fi ame of nature sprang . what stretched out the heavens, established the earth, sus- tained all things ! what turned the mighty wheels of Pro- vidence, throughout all the successions of time ! what or- dered and changed times and seasons, chained up devils restrained the outrages of a tumultuous world, preserved God's little flock ! especially, what gave being to the new creation 1^ (the exceeding greatness of power that wrought in them that believed, &c.) what made hearts love God, embrace a Saviour ! what it was that over- camey their own, and made them a willing people in that memorable day ! How delightful a contemplation to think, with so enlarged an understanding, of the possible effects of this power; and so far as a creature can range into infinity, to view innumerable creations, in the creative power of God ! And yet how pleasant to think, not only of the extents, but of the restraints of this power ; and how, when none could limit, it became ordinate, and did limit itself! that since it could do so much, it did no more ; turned^ not sooner a degenerous world ^into flames ; withheld itself from premature revenge, that had abortived the womb of love, and cut off all the hopes of this blessed eternity that is now attained ! This also speaks the greatness of power : "^ Let the power of my Lord be great, according as thou hast spoken, the Lord is gracious, long-suffering, &c. — This was his mightiest power, whereby he overcame him- self : Portior est qui se, &c. 3. And what do we think of the ravishing aspects of his love, when it shall, now, be open faced, and have laid aside its vail ! when his amiable smiles shall be checkered with no intermingled frowns ; the light of that pleasing countenance be obscured by no intervening cloud ! when goodness, which is love issuing into benefaction, or doing good ; grace, which adds freeness unto goodness ; mercy, which is grace towards the miserable ; shall conspire in their distinct, and variegated appearances to set off each other, and enhance the pleasure of the admiring soul ! when the wonted doubts shall all cease, and the difficulty vanish, of reconciling (once necessary) fatherly severity with love ! when the full sense shall be unfolded to the s Ver. It. u Chap xxvi. z Posse et nolle iiobilo. t Psal I.\ii. 11. Power to God, Hcbr. X Eplu i. 19, 20. y Psal. ex. 3. a Numb. xiv. 17,18. CriAP. V. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 207 life, ofthatdesci'iption of the Divine nature, "God is love;" and the soul be no longer put to rtad ihe love of God in his name, (as Moses was when the sight of his face could not yet be obtained,) shall not need to spell it by letters and syllables; but behold it in his very nature itself, and see how intimately essential it is to the Divine Being ! How glorious will this appearance of God be, (we, now, hear, something of the glory of his grace,) and how satisfying the tuition of that glory! Now is the proper season for the full exercise and discovery of love. This day hath been long expected, and lo, now 'tis dawned upon the awakening soul ; it's now called forth; its senses unbound ; all its powers in- spirited, on purpose, for love-visions and enjoyments: 'tis now to take its fill of loves. The apostle's ecstatical prayer is now answered to the highest degree possible with re- spect to such a one. He is now, "^according to the riches of Divine glory, strengthened with might, by the Spirit, in the inner man — to comprehend with all saints, what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height ; to know that love that passeth knowledge, &c. He shall now no longer stand amazed, spending his guesses, what manner of love this should be ; and expecting fuller discoveries, further effects of it, that did not yet appear ; but sees the utmost, all that his soul can bear, or wish to see. He hath now traced home the rivulets to their fountain, the beams to the very sun of love. He hath got the prospect, at last, into that heart, where the great thoughts of love were lodged from everlasting ; where all its counsels and de- signs were formed. He sees what made God become a man ; what clothed a Deity with human flesh ; what made eternity become the birth of time, when come to its partu- rient d fulness ; what moved the heart of the Son of God to pitch his tabernacle among men ; what engaged him to the enterprise of redeeming sinners; what moved him so earnestly to contest with a perishing world, led him at last to the cross, made him content to become a sacrifice to God, a spectacle to angels and men, in a bitter reproachful death, inflicted by the sacrilegious hands of those whom he was all this while designing to save. The amazed soul now sees into the bottom of this design ; understands why itself was not made a prey to Divine revenge; whence it was, that it perished not in its enmity against God ; that he was not provoked by the obstinacy of its disobedience, and malice of its unbelief, beytmd the possibility of an atonement; why he so long suffered its injurious neglects of him, and unkind repulses of a merciful Saviour; and persuaded, till at last he overcame, made the averse heart yield, the careless disaffected soul cry out, "Where is my God ?" Now a Christ, or I perish 1 All this is now re- solved into love ; and the adoring .soul sees how well the effects agree to their cause, and are owned by it. Nothing but heaven itself, that gives the sense, can give the notion of this pleasure. 4. Nor will the glory of holiness be less resplendent ; that great attribute which, even in a remote descent from its original, is frequently mentioned with the adjunct of "^beauties. What loveliness will those beauties add to this blessed face ! Not here to insist (which is besides my pur- pose) upon the various notions of holiness :f real holiness Scripture states in purity, an alienation from sin ; 'tis set in opposition to all filthiness, to all moral impurity: and in that notion it best agrees to God; and comprehends his righteousne.ss and veracity, and indeed, whatever we can conceive in him, under the notion of a moral excellency. This may therefore be styled a transcendental attribute, that as it were runs through the rest, and casts a glory upon every one: 'tis an attribute of attributes. Those are fit predications, holy power, holy truth, holy love, &c. And so it is the very lustre and glory of his other perfections; ?he is glorious in holiness. Hence in mat- ters of greatest moment, he is sometimes brought in i> swearing by his holiness, (which he is not wont to do by any one single attribute,) as though it were a. fuller b Eph. i. 6. c Epti. iii. 16, 17, 18, 19. d Gal. iv. 4. e Psal. ex. 3, &c. f 2 Cor. vii. I. s Exod. xv. 11. li Psal. hxxix. 35. Amos iv. 2. i 1 .Sam. \i. k Exod. XV. 11. 1 Sam. ii. 2. Psal. xxx. ). xcvii 12. I Si ergo pnlihritndo di\ina noiidiim visa, sed solum crcdita et sporala, tan- turn i^em desiderii c.xcitat : Quid taciet cum. romnto vplo. ut est iu sp ron- ipicitur'Omiiiiio id faciei ut torreute voluptatis illiua iiiebriuti, neijue veliiiuis. ezyression of himself, an adaquatior conceptits, than any of the rest. What is of so great an account with him, will not be of least account with his holy ones, when they appear in his glorious presence. Their own holiness is a conformity to his ; the likeness of it. And a.s their beholding it forms them into that likem;.ss; so that likeness makes them capable of beholding it with plea.sure. Divine holiness doih now more ravish than affright. This hath been the language of sinful dust.i Who can stand before this holy God'! when holiness haih appeared armed with terrors, guarded with flames, and the Divine Majestj' been repre- sented as a consuming fire. Such apprehensions sin and guilt naturally beget; the sinners of Sion were afiaid. But so far as the new man is put on, created after God, and they, who were darkness, are made light in the Lord, he is not under any notion more acceptable to them, than as he is the Holy One. They love his lav, because holy ; and love each other because holy; and hate themselves because they are no more so. Holiness hath still a pleasing aspect when they find it in an ordinance, meet it in a sab- bath; every glimpse of it is lovely. But with what tri- umphs hath the holiness of God himself been celebrated even by saints on earth Ik Who is a God like unto thee, glorious in holiness ! There is none holy as the Lord, for there is none besides thee. Sing unto the Lord, all ye saints of his, and give thanks at the remembrance of his holiness. What thoughts will they have of it,i when their eyes can behold that glory ; when they immediately look on the archet>T)al holiness, of which their own is but the image ; andean view that glorious pattern, they were so long in framing to 1 How joyfully will they then fall in with the rest of the heavenly host ; and join in the same adoration and praise, in the same acclamation and triumphant song, Holy, holy, holy. Lord God of Sabaoth ! How uncon- ceivable is the pleasure of this sight ; when the dvrn Ka>6v, the first pulchritude, the original beauty offers it.self to view! Holiness is intellectual beauty; Divine holiness is the most perfect and the measure of all other; and what is the pleasure and satisfaction, of which we speak, but the perfection and rest of love "? Now" love, as love, respects and connotes a pulchritude in its object. And then the most perfect pulchritude, the ineffable and immortal pul- chritude, that cannot be declared by words, or seen with eyes, (they are a heathen's" expressions concerning it,) how can it but perfectly and eternally plea.-^e and satisfy 1 And we are told by the great pagan theologue," in what state we can have the felicii}'^ of that s^jectacle. Not in our present state; when we have, indeed, but obscure repre- sentations of such things as are, with souls of highest ex- cellency ; but when we are associated to the llcsscd quire ;P When we are delivered from the body; (which we now carry about, as the oyster doth its'^ shell ;) M'hen we are no longer sensible of the evils of time. When we wholly ap- ply ourselves to that blessed vision; are admitted to the beholding of the simple permanent sights ; and behold them,'' being ourselves pure, in the pure light : then have we the view of the bright shining jmlchriiude, &c. 2. It is an entire or united glory. We have some- thing of the Divine glory shining now upon us; but the many interpositions cause a various refraction of its light. We have but its dispersed rays, its scattered, dishevelled beams : we shall then have it perfect and full. 'TIS the eternal glory we are hereafter to behold. Eternity (as the notion of it is wont to be stated) is a duration that ex- cludes both succession and end. And if it be an unsnc- cessive duration, (thou£:h it is more difficult to apprehend how the being or enjoyments of a creature can come under that mensuration, or how there can he any such,) the glory presented to the view of a blessed soul, cannot be presented by parcels, but at once.^ In our temporary state, while we are under the measure of time, we are not capable of the fulness of blessedness or misery ; for time exists not altc neque possimus, vcl nd punctum tpmix)ris, oculos ab ea djvcrtarp. Bollami- dc asceus. mentis ad Deimi, grad. 2. in Max. Tyr dissert. 11. n Id. ibid. o Plato in Phsrdro pa.4sim. (Though he there sptalis these tilings as the memoirs of his supix)sed pre-existciit soul.) p E"('"i/ioii \"(Ja/ir/Ooi'. s .lEteriiitus est intemiiiiabiiis vita tola siniul et periccta jiossessio. Boeth. 208 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. VI gether but by parts. And indeed we can neither enjoy nor suffer more, at once, than can be compassed within one moment; for no more exists together. But our relation to eternity (according to this notion of it) will render the same invariable appearance of glory, always presentaneous to us, in the entire fulness of it. We read indeed' of cer- tain ir^pfifara iri^ eoj(, aftcrhigs of faith, {a.s it may he signifi- cantly enough rendered, let but the novelty of the expres- sion be pardoned,) things lacking we read it ; but there will be here no Wf^pftjiara Jtff/j;, afte rings of glory. What is perfect admits no increase; 'tis already "full : and why should not a full glory satisfy ? There is here no expecta- tion of (greater) future, to abate the pleasure of present discoveries. Why therefore shall not this satisfaction be conceived full and perfect 1 It must be the fulness of joy. 3. 'Tis permanent glory ; a never fading, unwithering glory," (a^Oa^ros anapavTix;,) glory that will never be sullied, or obscured, never be in a declination. This blessed face never grows old ; never any wrinkle hath place in it. 'Tis the eternal glory, (in the other part of the notion of eter- nity,) as it imports an endless duration, neither subject to decay, in itself, nor to injury, or impairment,'' from with- out. As stable as the Divine Being; Thy God, thy glory; the Lord thy everlasting light : if that have a true sense with respect to any of the church militant on earth, it must needs have a more full sense, in reference to it triumph- ing in heaven. As, therefore, full entire glory affoids ful- ness of joy ; permanent, everlasting glory affords y plea- sures for evermore. 4. An appropriate glory, even to them 'tis so ; a glory wherein they are really interested. 'Tis the glory of their God, and tlieir happiness is designed to them from it. They are not unconcerned in it, as 'tis the glory of God. It cannot but be grateful to them to behold the shining glory of their God; whom they feared and served before, while they could have no such sight of him. That glory of his was once under a cloud, concealed from the world, wrapt up in obscvrrity : it now breaks the cloud, and jus- tifies the fear and reverence of his faithful and loyal ser- vants, against atheistical rebels, that feared him not. 'Tis infinitely pleasing to see him now so glorioiis, whom they thought to have a glory beyond all their conceptions before ; while others would not think so of him, but judged it safe to slight and set him at nought. Subjects share in their prince's glory, children in their father's. But besides that collateral interest, that interest by reflection, they have a more direct interest in this glory. A true and real right, upon a manifold title : the Father's gift. Son's purchase. Holy Ghost's obsignation and earnest ; the promises' ten- der ; their faith's acceptance ; their forerunner's prepos- session: yea, 'tis their ^ inheritance; they are children and therefore heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, to the same glory with him. They are by him received to the glory of God, called to his kingdom and glory. Will it not contribute exceedingly to their satisfaction, when they shall look upon this glory, not as unconcerned spectators, but as interested persons'! This is my happiness, to be- hold and enjoy this blessed God ! What a rapturous ex- pression is that,m God our own God shall bless us ; and that, Thy God thy glory ! Upon interest in God, follows their interest in his glory and blessedness ; which is so much the dearer, and more valuable, as it is theirs: their glory, from their God. They shall be blessed by God, their own God ; drink waters out of their own well. How endearing a thing is propriety ! Another man's son is in- genious, comely, personable, this may be a matter of envy ; but mine own is so, this is a joy. I read in the life of a devout nobleman of France," that receiving a letter from a friend, in which were inserted these words, Dcus vieus, et omnia; My God, andviy all ; he thus returns back to him, " I know not what your intent was, to put into your letter these words, Dcus mens, et omnia, ; My God, and my all ; only you invite me thereby to return the same to you, and 1 1 "DiesB. iii. 10. u 1 Pet. i. 3. 2 Cor. iv. 17. 2 Tim. ii. 10. 1 Pet. v. 10. X Isa. Ix. 14. y P.sat xvi. 11. z Rom. viii. 17. cli. rv. 7. 1 Thees. ii. 12. ni Psalm Ixvii. 6. n Monsieur de Renti. a Res simt perfectiores vel imperfectiorcs prout a summa perfecfione mapiB vclminime abscedunt. Pet. Moliii. and all arms are of an equal size ; or are content with their own measure. 2. 'Tis more certain. For what do we use to reckon so certain as what we see with our eyes'? Better (even in this respect) is the sight of the eyes, than the wandering of the desire. While here the mind is carried, with most earnest desire, to pursue knowledge, it very often mistakes its way, and miserably wanders. In our most wary ratiocinations, we many times shoot at rovers ; but when we know by this vision, our mark is immediately presented to our eye. We are in no danger to be imposed upon by delusive ap- pearances of things. We look through no fallacious mo- diums, are held in no suspense ; puzzled with no doubts, whether such consequences will hold, such conclusions be rightly inferred ; and so are not retarded from giving a present unwavering assent. Here are no perplexing in- tricacies, no dubious hallucinations, or uncertain guesses. We see things, as they are, by a simple and undeceiving light, with both subjective and objective certainty, being secure both from doubt and error. 2. Faith. How magnificent things doth Scripture speak of this grace ! which the experience also of such as have been wont to live by it {i. e. to make it the governing prin- ciple of their lives) doth abundantly confirm. Hovv clear c Niinniilli tapcUo investisniKias veritatis, cuililtet opinioni potiii.'s ignavi Bucciimbiiiiti (inam in e.xploranda veritate, pertinaci diligentfa perseverare volunt. Min. Folix. Oct. 9. d Atoue ut lioinini .fedenti ad ri(i«m fluminis. sola aqua presens est qufe ei hoc tennwris puiictnio otiyenatiir ; eidcni vero tiomini, tntnm flumen presens eswt, ui supra sumniatn aeris regionem crectiis, iiiio aspnctii fontini are its apprehensions ! f 'tis the evidence of things not .seen : how sweet its enjoyments !& whom not seeing ye love; and though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice, with joy unspeakable, and full of glory. Even the heathen theology hath magnified it above knowledge. "What is it (saith one) that unites us with the self-goodne.ss, and so joins us ihet eto, that it quiets or gives rest to all our action and motion 1 I will express it in one word ; 'lis (ail h itself, which unspeakably, and after a hidden manner, doth unite and conjoin happy souls with the self-good. For (saith he) it concerns us not, either in the way of sci- ence, !■ or tcith any imperfection, to inqv.ire after the good ; but to behold ourselves in the Divine light, and so shutting our eyes, to be placed in the un^;nov:n and secret unity of being's." And a later writer gives us this, as a conclusion from that former author, That as faith, which is credulity,i is below science ; so that faith, which is truly so called, is, super-subsianlially, above science and intelligence, imme- diately uniting us to God. But 'tis evident, intuitive knowledge far exceeds even faith also. 1. 'Tis more distinct and clear. Faith is taking a thing upon jeport ;ii Who hath believed our report 1 And they are more general, languid apprehensions we have of thing.-s this way. Faith enters at the ear;' it comes by hearing. And if we compare the perceptions of these two external senses, that of hearing, and sight ; the latter is unspeaka- bly more clear, and satisfying. He that hath knowledge of a Ibreign country, only by report of another, liath very indistinct apprehensions of if, in comparison of him who hath travelled it himself While the queen of Sheba only heard of Solomon's glory, she could not .satisfy herself without an avri'ipm, the sight of her own eye; and, when she saw it, she saith, the one half was not told her of what she now beheld. The ear more slowly and gradually re- ceives, and the tongue more defectively expresses to an- other, an account of things; than one's ocular in.spection would take it in. But, as to the excellency of this intuitive knowledge above faith ; the comparison "lies not between knowing by the ministry of a more noble sense, and a less noble ; but knowing by dependence on a less noble, and wiinout dependence upon any at all. When God hath been pleased to afford discoveries, in that way of vision, to men in the body, (his prophets, &c.) he hath usually bound up their senses, by sleep or trances; sense hath had no p>art or lot in this matter; unto believing it must necessarily concur. 2. More effective. What we see, even with our exter- nal eye, much more powerfully moves our heart, than what we only give credit to upon hearsay. The queen of Sheba much admired, no doubt, Solomon's famed splendour and magnificence, while she only heard of it ; but when she saw' it, it put her into an ecstasy; it ravished away her soul ; she had no more spirit, &c. What would the sight of the Divine glory do, if God did not strengthen with all might; were there" not as well glorious power to support, as powerful glory to transform ! Job had heard of God by the hearing of the ear, but when once his eye saw him, (whether that were by the appearance of any sensible glory; which is probable enough, for 'tis said, the Lord answered him out of the whirlwind ; or whether by a more immedi- ate revelation, 'lis less material,) what work did it make in his soul ! The devils believe, and tremble; so impressive are the pre-apprehensions of judgment to come, and the consequents thereof, with them; yet their present torment, thence, is no torment, in comparison (art thou come to torment us before the time]) of what they expect. Let wicked men consider this ; (they will have their intuition in hell too;) were yourbelief and terrortheicupon, with re- ference to the eternal judgment, and the impendent wrath of God, equal to what the devils themselves have, upon the same accoimt; actual sensation will make you more exceed yourselves in point of misery, than the devils do now exceed you. There is, no doubt, a proportionable difference between the impressions of present faith, and future vision, with holy souls. Now, not seeing, yet be- lievi/ig, they rejoice, with joy unspeakable. Their present ct ostium fluniinis posset aspicere : Ita oculo Di'i. *c. P. INloliiieus de cogiiit. r>ii. e Hprticrl. f EXfj-ynj. Heb. xi 1. g 1 Pet i. S. hoc ) r.'CdfWf, ovAe aT£>(OS, aXX'iniOJi'TUf.tavrot'S rioi OcKot vton, &c. Prnrliio in Plat Tiieol. i I'iciw Mirand. k Isa. liii. 1. 1 Rom. .x. 16. 310 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Ciup. vr. joy cannot be spoken ; their future then cannot be thought ! Experience daily tells us, how greatly sensible, present objects have the advantage upon us, beyond those that are spiritual and distant, though infinitely more excellent and important. When the tables are turned, the now sensible things disappear; a new scene of things, invisible and eternal, is immediately presented to our view ; when the excellency of the objects, the disposedness of the subjects, the nature of the act, shall all multiply the advantages, on this part. How affective will this vision be, beyond what we have ever found the faint apprehensions of our so much disadvantaged faith to amount to ! A kind message from an indulgent father, to his far-distant son, informing of his welfare, and yet continuing love, will much affect; but the sight of his father's face, will even transport, and over- come him with joy. But further consider this intuition a little more particu- larly and absolutely in itself So, you may take this somewhat distincter account of it, in some few particulars, corresponding to those, by which the object (the glory to be beheld) was lately characterized. — 1. It will be a vi- gorous, cfficacioits intuition ; as that which it beholds is the most. excellent ; even the Divine glory. Such an object cannot be beheld, but with an eye full of lively vigour; a sparkling, a radiant eye : a weak eye would be struck blind, would fail, and be closed up at the first glance. We must suppose, then, this vision to be accompanied with the highest vitality, the strongest energy, a mighty plenitude of spirit and power, no less than the Divine : nothing but the Divine power t-an sufficiently fortify the soul to behold Divine glory. When the apostle speaks only of his desire of glory, He that hath wrought us to this self-same thing (saith he) is God, he that hath moulded us, suitably framed us (as the word signifieth) for this thing, is God : 'tis the work of a Deity to make a soul desire glory : certainly, then, 'tis his work to give the power of beholding it. And by how much the more of power, so much the more of pleasure in this vision. Weak sight would afford but lan- guid joy : but when the whole soul, animated with divine power and life, shall seat itself in the eye ; when it shall be, as it were, all eye, (as one said of God, whom now it perfectly imitates,) and be wholly intent upon vision ; ap- ply itself thereto with all its might, as its only business;'" what satisfying joys doth it now taste ! renewed by every repeated view! how doth it now, as it were, prey upon glory ; as the eye of the eagle upon the beams of the sun ! We meet with the expression of aurcs bibula ; here will be oculi hibuli, f.hirsty eyes; a soul ready to drink in glory at the eye. If vision be by intromission, what attractiv^e eyes are here, drawing in glory, feeding upon glory ! If by ex- tramission, what piercing, darting eyes, sending forth the soul at every look to embrace the glorious object! There is a great power that now attends realizing though ts of God : whether it appear in the consequent working of the soul directly towards God ; or by way of reflection upon itself. If directly towards God ; how mightily is he admired ! " Who is a God like unto thee 1" If by reflec- tion upon our own sin, and vileness; how deeply doth it humble ! — " Now mine eye seeth thee, therefore I abhor myself — Wo is me, I am undone, — mine eyes have seen the Lord of glory." If by way of reflection, upon our in- terest in him, or relation to him ; how mightily doth it support and comfort !» " I will look to the Lord, — my God will hear me." How full of rich sense is that scrip- ture," They looked to him and were lightened ! One look clothed them with light, cast a sflory upon their souls, filled them with life and joy ; 'twas but a thought, the cast of an eye, and they were as full as hearts could hold. O the power then of these heavenly visions, when we dwell in the views of that transforming glory ! — 2. This will be a comprehensive intuition ; as its object is entire glory. I mean comparatively, not absolutely comprehensive. More of the Divine glory will be comprehended, unspeakably, than before. 'Tis called, we know, by the schoolmen, the knowledge of comprehensors, in contradiction to that of viators. W^e shall better be able to discern the Divine ex- cellencies together; have much more adequate concep- m S. Hipronyni. n Mic. vii. 7. o P»al. xx.viv. .">. tions ; a fuller, and more complete notion of God : we shall see him as he is. 'Tis too much observable, how in our present state, we are prejudiced by our partial conceptions of him; and what an inequalit}' they cause in the temper of our spirits. For wicked men, the very notion they have of God proves fatal to their souls, or is of a most destruc- tive tendency ; because they comprehend not together what God hath revealed of himself Most usually, they confine those few thoughts of God they have, only to his mercy; and that exclusively, as to his holiness and justice; hence their vain and mad presumption. The notion of an unholy (or a not-holy, and not-just) God, what wickedness would it not induce ! " Thou thoughtest I was altogether such a one as thyself:" a God after their own hearts; then the reins are let loose. More rarely, when the conscience of guilt hath arrested the self-condemned wretch, God is thought of under no other notion, than of an irreconcilable enemy and avenger; as one thirsting after the blood of souls, and that will admit of no atonement. So without all pretence, and so flatly contrary to all his discoveries of himself, do men dare to affix to him black and horrid cha- racters, forged only out of the radicated and inveterate hatred of their ow-n hearts against him, (that never take up good thoughts of any one,) only because they have no mind to acquaint themselves with him ; and that they may have some colour for their affected distance ; and so, per- haps, never return ; but perish under a horrid wilful despair. And even the people of God themselves are too apt some- times, so wholly to fix their eye upon love and grace, that they gro-w into an unbecoming, uncreaturely familiarity ; while the thoughts of infinite majesty, adorable greatness and glory, are asleep : sometimes, possibly, ihey apprehend vindictive justice, the indignation and jealousy of God against sin, (precluding meanwhile the consideration of his indulgent compassions towards truly humble and penitent souls,) to that degree of affrightment and dread, that they grow into an unchildlike strangeness towards him, and take little pleasure in drawing nigh to him. But when, nmo, our eye shall take in the discovery of Divine glory equally, how sweet and satisfying a pleasure will arise from that grateful mixture of reverent love, humble joy, modest confidence, meek courage, a prostrate magnanimity, a triumphant veneration; a soul shrinking before the Di- vine glory into nothing, yet not contenting itself W'ith any less enjoyment, than of him, who is all in all ! There is nothing here in this complexion, or temper of soul, but hath its warrant, in the various 8ispect of the face of God comprehensively beheld ; nothing but what is (even by its suitableness) highly grateful and pleasing. — 3. 'Twill be fixed, steady intuition, as its object is permanent glory. The vision of God can neither infer, nor admit weariness. The e)'e cannot divert ; its act is eternally delectable, and affords an unvariable, undecaying pleasure. Sensual de- lights soon end in loathing; quickly bring a glutting sur- feit ; and degenerate into torm^ents,? when they are con- tinued and unintermittent. A philosopher, i in an epistle which he writes to a friend, from the court of Dionysius, where he was forcibly detained, thus bemoans himself, " We are unhappy, O Anlisthenes, beyond measure! and how can we but be unha,ppy, that are hirdened by the tyrant every day with suviptuons feasts, plentifid compotations, precious ointments, gorgeous apparel ? and I knew as soon as I co.nie into this island amd city, hoxc unilMppy my life would be." This is the nature and common condition of even the most pleasing sensible objects : they first tempt, then please a little, then disappoint, and lastly vex. The eye that beholds them, blasts them quickly, rifles and de- flowers their glory ; and views them with no more delight at first, than disdain afterwards. Creature-enjoyments have a bottom, are soon drained and drawn dry: hence there must be frequent diversions ; other pleasures must be sought out ; and are chosen, not because they are better, but because they are new. This demonstrates the emptiness and vanity of the creature. Affection of variety only proceeds from sense of want; and is a confession, upon trial, that there is not in suet an enjoyment what was expected. Proportionably, p Proba istaa. qiiae voluptales vocantiir, ubi modum transcomlorint, pa'nas es.ae. Sen. Ep. 83. „ . « q K'UoJ(ii/< .vjvuef, w Avriadcve;, ov jiSTpius, &c. 3ocraticorum. Epist. 9. ClTAP. VII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE HIGHTEOUS. 211 in the state of glory, a constant indeficient fulness, renders the blessed soul undesirous of any change. There is no need of varieties, or diversions : what did once please, can never cease to do so. This glory cannot fade, or lose any thing of its attractive power. The faculty cannot languish, or lose the disposition, by which it is contempered and made proportionable thereto. Hence no weariness can en- sue. What ! a soul in which the love of God is perfected, grow weary of beholding him ! The sun will sooner grow weary of shining; the touched needle of turning itself to its wonted point ; every ihing will sooner grow weary of its centre ; and the most fundamental laws of nature be sooner antiquated and made void for ever. The eye of the fool, Solomon tells as,"- is in the ends of the earth. His, only, is a rolling wandering eye, that knows not where to fix. Wisdom guides, and fixes the eye of the holy soul ; determines it unto God only :« I will bless the Lord, who hath given me counsel, my reins also instruct me, — I have set the Lord always before me. Surely heaven will not render it less capable of dijudication; of passing a right judgment of the excellency and worth of things. And here, a rational judgment will find no want; and an irrational will find no place. Therefore, as permanent glory will certainly infer a perpetual vision ; perpetuated vision will as certainly perpetuate the soul's satisfaction and blessed- ness. — 4. 'Twill be a possessive intuition : as 'tis an appro- priale glory which it pitches upon. 'Twill be the language of ever)^ look, " This glory is mine." The soul looks not upon it shyly, as if it had nothing to do with it ; or with slight and careless glances : but the very posture of its eye speaks its interest, and proclaims the pretensions it hath to this glory. With how different an aspect doth a stran- ger passing by, and the owner, look upon the same house, the same lands ! A man's e3'e lays his claim for him and avows his right. A grateful object that one can say is his own, he arrests it with his eye; so do saints with appropri- ative looks behold their God, and the Divine glory. Even with such an eye as he was wont to behold them;' To this man will I look, &c. that is, as the place of my rest, mentioned before ; he designs him with his eye. Which is the import of that expression," The Lord knows who are his; his eye marks them out ; ot\tis them as his own : as concerning others, whom he disowns, the phrase is, I know you not. And how vastly different is such an intu- ition, from that, when I look upon a thing with a himgry, lingering eye, which I must never enjoy, or never expect to be the better for ! This vision is fruitive, imites the soul with the blessed object : which kind of sight is meant, when actual blessedness is so oflen expressed by seeing God. We see then what vision, the sight of God's face, contributes to the satisfaction of blessed souls. CHAPTER VII. Wherein assimilation (the likeness or glory of God impressed) contributes imto satisfaction : where is particularly propounded to be showTi, Wliat pleasure it involves, what it disposes to : What it involves in the «.?«(; of it, what in the cognosci. 1 The pleasure of being like God discovered. 1. Showing concerning the image of God (generally considered) that it is the soul's health and soundness restored ; that it is a vital, an intimate, a connatiu'al, a per- fect image. 2. OoR next business is to discover, what assimilation, or the impressed likeness of God, may further add to this satisfied state ; or, what satisfying pleasure the blessed soul finds in this, that it is like God. And here we are distinctly to inquire into — the pleasure which such an as- similation to God involves in itself, and — that which it tends and disposes to. I. The pleasure it involves in itself; or, which is taken in it abstractedly considered ; which we may more par- ticularly unfold by showing — the pleasure involved, 1. in being like God : and — 2. in knowing or reflecting upon the same : the esse and the cognosci of this assimilation. 1. The pleasure in being like God ; which may be dis- r Prov. xvii. 24. s Psal. xvi, 7, 8. t Isa. Ixvi. 1,9. , H 2 Tim. ii 19. a TiiJt'tirepov xpvxri amnaro';, to ie rifiibiTcpov ayaQov fxcti^ov, to fie T(ot liCiZovt, ayaOioi euavTioi', ficiZnv KOKOvayadov Se jxet^ovvi ctn xpvxm vyaas ooijiaTOi, jiei^nv ovv kukov vooji ipv\r}s, voirov acofiaTOi, I'Offos \pv\rii fiox- dnpia, &c. Max. Tyr. dissert. 41. covered both by a general consideration hereof, and by in- stancing in some particulars, wherein blessed souls shall be like him. L It is obvious to suppose an inexpressible pleasure in the very feeling, the inward sensation, the holy soul will have of that happy frame in general, whereinlo it is now brought ; that joyful harmony, that entire rectitude, it finds within itself. You may as soon separate light from a sun- beam, as plea.sure from such a state. This likeness or conformity to God is an cvKpaaio, a perfect temperament; an athletic healthine.ss ; a strong sound consiitution of soul. Do but imagine, what it is to a man's body, after a wasting sickness, to find himself well. Frame a notion of the pleasure of health and .soundness, when both all the parts and members of the body are in their proper places and proportions, and a lively, active vigour, a sprightly strength, possesses every part, and actuates the whole ; how plea.sant is this temper ! If we were all body, there could be no greater felicity than this. But by how much the more noble an)' creature is, so is it capable of more exqui- site pains, or pleasures. ''Sin is the sickness and disease of the soul ; enfeebles all its powers, exhausts its vigour, wastes its strength. You know the restless tossings, the weary roslings to and fro, of a diseased languishing body ; such is the case of a sinful soul. Let it but seriously be- think itself, and then speak its own sen.se; (but here is the malignity of the disease, it cannot be serious, it always raves ;) What will it bel "01 can take no rest !" The way of wickedness is called ba way of pain : sinners would find it so, if the violence of the disease had not be- reft them of sense: Nothing savours with me; I can take comfort in nothing. The wicked are as a troubled sea (as their name imports") that cannot rest, whose waters, &.c. The image of God, renewed in holiness and righteousness, is health restored, after such a consuming sickness; which ■u'hen we awake, when all the drowsiness that attends our disease is shaken ofl^, we find to be perfect. The fear of the Lord, (an ordinary paraphrase of holiness or piet\',) is said to be health to the navel and marrow to the bones. Our Lord Jesus invites'^ wearied sinners to come to him, to take his yoke on them, to learn of him, that is, to imitate him, to be like him ; and promises the}' shall find rest to their souls. How often do we find grace and peace in conjunction in the apostles' sahitations and benedictions ! We are told that the ways of Divine wisdom {i. e. which it prescribeth) are alln, as Rom. xiv. 17. above : so 1 John v. 3. This is love iha', &c. So here, such a mind is life and peace (though the copula be not in the original, it is fitly supplied in the translation.) You cannot separate {q. d.) life and peace from such a mind: it hath no principle of death or trouble in it. Let such as know any thing of this blessed temper and complexion of soul, compare this scripture and their own experience together ; when at any time they find their souls under the blessed empire and dominion of a spiritual mind, Avhen spirituality wholly rules and denominates them. Arenot their souls the very region of life and peace 1 both these in conjunction, life and peace 1 not raging life, not stupid peace ; but a placid, peaceful life, a vital, vigor- ous rest and peace: 'tis not the life of a fury, nor peace of b 2:f J7 Tit Psal. cxxxix. 84. V&'"' Isa. Uii. 20. Hinc ilbid rt tspdium et di.spli- ceutia sui, et nusqiiam residentis aiiimi volutatio, &c. Sen. ile Tranqu. aninii. c Mat, xi. 2S. d Prov. iii 1.'?. P.h. v. Jamea i. blessedness. Nothing can be necessary to its full satisfac- tion which it hath not in itself, by a gracious vouchsafe- ment and communication. The good man, (in that de- gree which his present state admits of,) Solomon tells us,' is satisfied from himself: he doth not need to traverse the world, to seek his happiness abroad ; he hath the matter of satisfaction, even that goodness which he is now en- riched with, in his own breast and bosom ;= yet he hath it all by participation from the fountain-goodness. But that participated goodness is so intimately one with him, as sutficiently warrants and makes good the assertion, he is satisfied from himself: viz. from himself, not primarily, or independently ; but by derivation from him who is all in all, and more intimate to us than we ourselves. And what is that participated goodness, but a degree of the Divine likeness 1 But when that goodness shall be fully participated, when this image and imitation of the Divine goodness shall be complete and entire, then shall we know the rich exuberant sense of those words. How fully will this image or likeness satisfy then ! And yet more dis- tinctly, we may apprehend how satisfying this likeness or image impressed will be, if, a little further deferring the view of the particulars of this likeness which we have de- signed to instance in, we consider these general properties ofit. 1. 'Tis a vital image : not the image only of him that lives, the living God ; but it is his living and soul-quick- ening image. 'Tis the likeness of him, in that very res- pect; an imitation and participation of the life of God ; by which, once revived, the soul lives that wa.s dead before. 'Tis not a dead picture, a dumb show, an unmoving statue ; but a living, speaking, walking image ; that wherewith the child is like the father : the veiy life of the subject where it is ; and by which it lives as God, speaks and acts con- formably to him. An image, not such a one as is drawn with a pencil, that expresses only colour and figure ; but such a one as is seen in a glass, ' that represents life and motion, as v.'as noted from a worth}^ author befcue. 'Tis even, in its first and moi'e important draught, an analogi- cal participation (as we must understand it) of the" Divine nature; before which first tincture, those preludious touches of it upon the spirit of man, his former state is spoken of as ^ an alienation from the life of God ; as having no interest, no communion therein. The y putting on of the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness, is presently mentioned, in direct oppo- sition to that dismal state, implying that to be a participa- tion of the Divine life: and certainly, so far as it is so, 'tis a participation of the Divine blessedness too. 2. 'Tis an image most intimate, therefore, to its subject. Glory it is ; but not a superficial skin-deep glory; such as shone in Moses's face, which he covered with a vail. 'Tis thoroughly transformative ; changes the soul throughout; not in external appearance, but in its very nature. All outward embellishments would add little felicity to a ptt- trid, corrupt soul. That would be but painting a sepul- chre ; this adds ornament unto life; and both, especially to the inward man. 'Tis not paint in the face, while death is at the heart; but 'tis the radication of such a principle within as will soon form and attemper the man univer- sally to itself. 'Tis glory, blessedness, participated, brought home and lodged in a man's own soul, in his own bosom; he cannot then but be satisfied. A man may have a rich stock of outward comforts, and while he hath no heart to enjoy them, be never the happier. But 'tis impossible, that happiness should be thus lodged in his soul, made so intimate, and one with him ; and yet, that he should not be satisfied, not be happy. 3. An image connatural to the spirit of man. Not a thing alien, and foreign to his nature, put into him pur- posely, as it were, to torment and vex him ; but an ancient well-known inhabitant, that had place in him from the beginning. Sin is the injurious intruder ; which there- fore puts the soul into a commotion, and permits it o Xdaipa t/."XJjf aiinfM/j?, orav firiTe CKTCivrirai Jiri ti, iirtre eato (rvvrpe- XI, finrf avvi^ai'ri, aWa (biOTi \afi7rr]Tat, &c. Marc. Antonin. lib. U. p Omnia non tain habere quam esse. Sen. q I Cor. xi. 7. r Prov. xiv. M. s Intimo nostro intimior. Essenostnim laudahile. Giliienf. He libertate, ci. Plat ct. An?. tSir ocnios. sic ille nianns. sic era ferebaf. u 2 1'ct. i. X Eph. iv. IS. y Ver. 83, 34. Chap. v't. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 213 not to rest, while it hath any being there. This image calms it, restores it, works a peaceful, orderly composure within; returns it to itself, to its pristine, blessed state; being reseated there, as in its proper, primitive subject. For though this image, in respect of corrupted nature, be supernatural; in respect of institute, and undefiled nature, it was in a true sense natural, a.s hath been demonstrated by divers of ours against the papists ; and upon the matter, yielded by some of the more moderate among themselves.^ At least it was connate with human nature, consentaneous to it, and perfective of it. We are speaking, it must be remembered, of that part of the Divine image that con- sists in moral excellencies; there being another part of it, as hath been said, that is, even in the strictest sense natu- ral. There is nothing in the whole moral law of God, (in conformity whereunto this image did, ab origine, consist,) nothing of what he requires from man, that is at all destruc- tive of his being, prejudicial to his comforts, repugnant to his most innate principles: nothing that clashes with his reason, or is contrary to his interest ; or that is not, most directly conservative of his being and comforts, agreea- ble to his most rational principles, subservient to his best and truest interest, for what "doth God the Lord require, but fear and love, service, and holy walking from an en- tire and undivided soul 1 what, but what is good; not only in itself, but for us ; and in respect whereof, his law is said to beb holy, just and good 1 And what he requireth, he impresseth. This law, written in the heart, is this like- ness. How grateful, then, will it be, when, after a long extermination and exile, it returns and re-possesses the soul, is recognized by it, becomes to it a new nature, (yea, even a divine, )■= a vital, living law, the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus ! What grievance, or burden, is it to do the dictates of nature 1 actions that easily and free- ly flow from their own principles 1 and, when blessedness itself is infolded in those very acts and inclinations ■? How infinitely satisfying and delightful will it be, when the soul shall find itself connaturalized to every thing in its duty ; and shall have no other duty incumbent on it than to be happy ! when it shall need no arguments and exhortations to love God: nor need be urged and pressed, as hereto- fore, to mind him, to fear before him! when love, and re- verence, and adoration, and praise ; when delight, and joy, shall be all natural acts ! Can you separate this, in your own thoughts, from the highest satisfaction ■? 4. This image will be now perfect; every way, fully perfect. — L In all its parts, as it is in the first instant of the soul's entrance into the state of regeneration ; the womb of grace knows no defective maimed births. And yet here is no little advantage," as to this kind of perfec- tion. For now those lively lineaments of the new creature all appear, which were much obscured before : every line of glory is conspicuous, every character legible, the whole entire frame of this image is, in its exact symmetry and apt proportions, visible at once. And 'tis an unspeakable addition to the pleasure of so excellent a temper of spirit, that accrues from the discernible entireness of it. Here- tofore, some gracious dispositions have been to seek, (through the present prevalence of some corruption or temp- tation,) when there was most need and occasion for their being reduced into act. Hence the reward and pleasure of the act, and improvement of the principle were lost to- gether. Now, the soul will be equally disposed to every holy exercise that shall be suitable to its state. Its temper shall be even and symmetral; its motions uniform and agree- able: nothing done out of season; nothing seasonable omitted, for want of a present disposition of spirit thereto. There will be not only an habitual, but actual entireness of the frame of holiness in the blessed soul. — 2. Again this image will be perfect in degree ; so as to exclude all degrees of its contrary, and to include all degrees of itself. There will be now no longer any colluctation with contra- ry principles; no law in the members warring against the law of the mind ; no lustings of the flesh against the spi- rit. That war is now ended in a glorious victory, and eternal peace. There will be no remaining blindness z As may \w seen liy rnmparinir wliat Estiussaysto tlic two question?. I. An gratia fuorit prirno liomini naturalis ? 2. Utrum originalis justitia fui-rit tiomi- ni supematuralis ? I. 2. (list. 25. a Deut. X. 18. Mic. vi. 3. b Rom. ni. 12. 18 of mind, nor error of judgment, nor perver.seness of will, nor irregularity or rebellion of affections : no ignoranceof God, no aversation from him, or disaffection towards him. This likeness removes all culpable dissimilitude orunlike- ness. This communicated ^ory fills up the whole soul, causes all clcjuds and darkness to vanish, leaves no place for any thing that is vile or inglorious ; 'tis pure glory, free from mixture of any thing that is alien to it. And it is itself full. The soul is replenished, not with air)', eva- nid shadows; but with substantial, solid glor}',(i a massive, weighty glory ; for I know not but subjective glory may be taken in within the significancy of that known scripture, if it be not more principally intended ; inasmuch as the text .speaks of a glory to be wrought out by afflictions, which are the files and furnaces, as it were, to polish or refme the soul into a glorious frame. 'Tis cumulated glory, glory added to glory. Here 'tis growing, progressive glory,' we are changed into the same- image from glory to glory. It shall, now, be stable, consistent glory ; that carries a self- fulness with it: (which some include also in the no- tion of purity :)f 'tis full itself, includes every degree re- quisite to its own perfection. God hath now put the last hand to this glorious image, added to it its ultimate ac- complishments. Now a conformity to Christ, even in the resurrection from the dead, in his glorious state, is fully attained. That prize of the high calling of God is now won. And the humble sense of not having attained as yet, and of not being already perfect, (in which humility the foundation of the temple of God in a saint Ls laid, and the building raised.) is turned into joyful acclamations, " Grace, grace !" for the laying on of the top stone, the finishing of this glorious work. And when ihis temple is filled with the glory of the Lord, the soul itself reple- nished with the divine fulness, will not its joys be full tool For here is no sacrifice to be offered but that of praise, and joy is the proper seasoning for that sacrifice. Now, the new creature hath arrived to the measure of the stature of a perfect man in Christ Jesus. The'first formation of this spiritual, as well as of the natural man, was hidden and secret, it was curiously wrought, and in a way no more liable to observation, than that of framing the child in the womb; as that is as hidden as the con- coction of minerals, or precious stones, in the lower parts of the earth. No secrets of nature can outvie the mysteries of godliness. Its growth is also by ver}' insensible de- grees, as it is with the products of nature : but its arrival to perfection is infinitely more strange than any thing in nature ever was. How sudden and wonderf'ul is the change, when, in the twinkling of an eye, the blessed soul instantly awakes out of drowsy languishings, and mi- serable weakness, into perfect strength and vigour !? As a man is, so is his strength; and as his strength is, so is his joy and pleasure. The sun is said to go forth as a strong man, rejoicing to run his race. When a man goes, in the fulness of his strength, upon anj' enterprise, how doth his blood and spirits triumph before-hand! No motion of hand or foot, is without a sensible delight. The strength of a man's spirit, is, unspeakably, more than that of the outward man ; its faculties and powers more refined and raised; and hence arc rational or intellectual exercises and operations much more delightful than corporeal ones can be. But (still as the man is, so is his strength) 'tis an incomparably greater strength that attends the heaven-born man. This man born of God, begotten of God, after his own likeness ; this hero, this son of God, was born to conflicts, to victories, to triumphs. While he is yet but in his growing age, he overcomes the world; (as Hercules the serpents in his cradle ;") overcomes the wicked one, and is at last more than conqueror. A mighty power attends godliness; "a spirit of power, and of a sound mind; but how much this divine creature grows, so much the more like God : and being perfect, conflicts cease : he had overcome and won the crown before. And now all his strength runs out into acts of plea.^ure. Now when he shali go forth in his might to love God, (as we are re- quired to love him now with all our might, and every act c Rom. viii. 2. d 2 Cor. iv. 17. e 2 Cor. iii. 18. f Puniin est quod est plenum sui, et quod minimum babet aUem. g Psal. xi-x. V!14 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. CHip. VIII. of praise shall be an act of power, done with a fulness of strength, (as 'tis said their praises, at the bringing home of the ark, were with all their might,) O ! what will the pleasure be that shall accompany this state of perfection ! Perfect power and perfect pleasure are here met, and shall for ever dwell together, and be always commensurate to one another. They are so here, in their imperfect state : our feeble, spiritless duties, weak, dead prayers ; they have no more sweetness than strength, no more pleasure than power in them. Therefore we are listless, and have no mind to duties, as we find we are more frequently desti- tute of a spiritual liveliness and vigour therein. When a spirit of might and power goes on with us in the wonted course of our converses with God, we then forecast oppor- tunities, and gladly welcome the season, when it extraor- dinarily occurs, of drawing nigh to him. It cannot be thought, that the connexion and proportion between these should fail in glory ; or that, when every thing else is per- fect, the blessed soul itself made perfect, even as God him- self is perfect, in this bearing his likeness, should be unlike him in bliss ; or its satisfaction be imperfect. CHAPTER VIII. The satisfaction carried in the glory of God impressed, further shown by in- stances. Certain particulars of this ; impression instanced in a dependent frame of spirit, subjection or self devoting, love, purity, liberty, tranquil- hty. But besides the general consideration of this likeness, we shall instance in some of the particular excellencies comprehended in it, wherein the blessed shall imitate and resemble God : whence we may farther estimate the plea- sure and satisfaction that being like God will afford. — Only here let it be remembered, that as we all along in this discourse, speak of likeness to God in respect of mo- ral excellencies; so by likeness to him, in respect of these, we understand, not only a participation of those which are communicable ; but a correspondent impress also as to those that are incommunicable ; as hath been more dis- tinctly opened in the propositions concerning this likeness. "Which being premised, I shall give instances of both kinds, to discover somewhat of the inexpressible pleasure of being thus conformed to God. And here, pretermitting the im- press of knowledge of which we have spoken imder the former head of vision, we shall instance, 1. In a dependent frame of spirit, which is the proper im- press of the Divine all-sufficiency and self-fulness, duly ap- prehended by the blessed soul. It is not easy to conceive a higher pleasure than this, compatible to a creature, — the pleasure of dependance; yea, this is a higher than we can conceive. Dependance (which speaks the creature's Tx^c'i or habitude to its principle, as the subserviency which imports its habitude to its end) is two-fold. — I. Natural : which is common and essential to all creatures ; even when no such thing is thought on, or considered by them. The creatures live, move, and have their beings inGod, whether they think of it or no. — 2. Vohmtary, or rational : which is de facto, peculiar; and de jure, common to reasonable creatures as such. A dependance that is, Ik Tzpoaipiinwi, elective f and, with a foregoing reason, (which I under- stand by elective, not a liberty of doing, or not doing it,) and concomitant consideration of what we do, and animad- version of our own act : when knov/ingly and willingly, understanding ourselves in what we do,"we go out of our- selves, and live in God. This is the dependance of which I speak. And it cannot but be attended with transcendant pleasure in that other state, when that knowledge and ani- madversion shall be clear and perfect: both, as this depen- dance imports— a nullifying of self— and magnifying (I may call it omnifying) of God, a making him all in all. — As it imports (which it doth most evidently) a self-anni- hilation, ap^tre nullifying of self , 'tis a continual recogni- tion of my own nothingness, a "momently, iterated confes- sion, that my whole btnng is nothing, but a mere puff of precarious breath, a bubble raised from nothing, by the arbitrary fiat of the great Creator ; reducible, had he so a Gal. ii. 20. pleased, any moment to nothing again. These are true and just acknowledgments, and to a well-tempered soul infinitely pleasant, when the stale of the case is thoroughlj' understood, (as now it is,) and it hath the apprehension clear ; how the creation is sustained, how, and upon whai terms, its own being, life and blessedness are continued to it; that it is every moment, determinable upon the con- stancy of the creator's will, that it is not simply nothing. 'Tis not possible that any thing should hinder this consi- deration from being eternally delightful, but that diaboli- cal uncreaturely pride, that is long since banished heaven, and that banished its very subjects thence also. Nothing can suit that temper, but to be a god; to be wholly inde- pendent, to be its own sufficiency. The thoughts of living at the will and pleasure of another, are grating; but they are only grating to a proud heart, which here, hath no place. A soul naturalized to humiliations, accustomed to prostrations and self-abasements, trained up in acts of mortification, and that was brought to glory through a continued course and series of self-denial ; that ever since it first came to know itself, was wont to depend for every moment's breath, for every glimpse of light, for every fresh influence, ("I live, yet not I — ) with what pleasure doth it, now, as it were, vanish before the Lord ! what de- light doth it take to diminish itself, and as it were, disap- pear ; to contract and shrivel up itself, to shrink even into a point, into a nothing, in the presence of the Divine glo- ry ; that it may be all in all ! Things are now pleasant, (to the soul, in its right mind) as they are suitable ; as they carry a comeliness and congruity in them ; and no- thing now appears more becoming, than such a self-annihila- tion. The distances of Creator and creature, of infinite and finite, of a necessary and arbitrary being, of a self- originated and a derived being, of what was from ever- lasting, and what had a beginning ; are now better imder- stood than ever. And the soul, by how much it is now come nearer to God, is more apprehensive of its distance. And such a frame and posture doth, hence, please it best, and doth most fitly correspond thereto. Nothing is so pleasing to it, as to be as it ought. That temper is most grateful that is most proper, and which best agreed with its state. Dependance therefore is greatly pleasing, as it is a self-nullifying thing. And yet it is, in this respect, pleasing, but as a means to a further end. The pleasure that attends it, is higher and more intense, according as it more immediately attains that end, viz. the magnifying and exalting of God : which is the most connatural thing to the holy soul ; the most fundamental and deeply im- pressed law of the new creature. Self gives place, that God may take it : becomes nothing, that he may be all : it vanishes, that his glory may shine the brighter. — Dependance gives God his proper glory. 'Tis the peculiar honour and prerogative of a Deity, to have a world of creatures hanging upon it, staying themselves upon it ; to be the fulcrum, the centre of a lapsing creation. When this dependance is voluntary and intelligent, it carries m it a more explicit owning and acknowledgment of God. By how much more this is the distinct and actual sense of my soul, Lord, I cannot live but by thee ; so much the more openly and plainly do I speak it out. Lord, thou art God alone; thou art the fulness of life and being; the only root and spring of life ; the everlasting I AM ; the Being of beings. How unspeakably pleasant, to a holy soul, will such a perpetual agnition or acknowledgment of God be ! when the perpetuation of its being shall be nothing else than a perpetuation of this acknowledgment; when every renewed aspiration, every motion, every pulse of the glorified soul, shall be but a repetition of it; when it shall find, itself, in the eternity of life, that everlasting state of life which it now possesses, to be nothing else than an everlasting testi- mony that God is God : He is so, for, I am, I live, I act, I have the power to love him; none of which could otherwise be. When amongst the innumerable myriads of the heavenly host, this shall be the mutual, alternate testimony of each to all the rest throughout eternity, will not this be pleasant 1 when each shall feel continually the fresh illapses and incomes of God, the power and sweetness of Divine influences, the enlivening vigour of Chip. VIII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 215 that vital breath, and find in themselves, thus we live and are sustained : and are yet as secure, touching the con- tinuance of this state of life, as if every one were a god to himself; and did each one possess an entire godhead. When their sensible dependance on him, in their glorified state, shall be a perpetual triumph over all the imaginary deities, the fancied AVm/i*/, wherewith he was heretofore provoked to jealousy; and he shall now have no rival left, but be acknowledged and known, to be all in all. How Eleasant will it then be, as it were, to lose themselves in im ! and to be swallowed up in the overcoming sense of his boundless, all-sufficient, every-where flowing fulness ! And then add to this ; they do by this dependance ac- tually make this fulness of God their own. They are now met in one common principle of life and blessedness, that is sufficient for them all. They no longer live a life of care, are perpetually exempt from solicitous thoughts, which here they could not perfectly attain to in their earthly state. They have nothing to do but to depend ; to live upon a present self-sufficient good, which alone is enough to replenish all desires ; else it were not self-suffi- cient. bHow can we divide, in our most abstractive thoughts, (he highest pleasure, the fullest satisfaction, from this dependance ] 'Tis to live at the rate of a God ; a God- like life : a living upon immense fulness, as he lives. 2. Subjection; which I place next to dependance, as being of the same allay ; the product of impre.ssed sove- reignty ; as the other, of all-sufficient fulness. Both im- pressions upon the creature, corresponding to somewhat in God, most inconomunicably appropriate to him. This is the soul's real and practical acknowledgment of the supreme Majesty ; its homage to its Maker ; its self-dedi- cation : than which nothing more suits the state of a crea- ture, or the spirit of a saint. And as it is suitable, 'tis pleasant. 'Tis that b}'' which the blessed soul becomes, in its own sense, a consecrated thing, a devoted thing, sacred to God : its very life and whole being referred and made over to him. With what delightful relishes, what sweet gusts of pleasure, is this done ! while the soul tastes its own act; approves it with a full ungainsaying judg- ment ; apprehends the condignity and fitness of it ; assents to itself herein; and hath the ready suffrage, the harmo- nious concurrence, of all its powers ! When the words are no sooner spoken, "Worthy art thou, O Lord, to receive glory, honour, and power, for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created ;" but they are resounded from the penetralia, the mmpst bmreh, the most intimate receptacles and secret chambers of the soul, O Lord, thou art worthy: worthy, that I, and all things, should be to thee : worthy, to be the Omega, as thou art the Alpha, the last, as thou art the first ; the end, as thou art the beginning, of all things; the ocean into which all being shall flow, as the fountain from which it sprung. My whole self, and all my powers, the excellencies now im- planted in my being, the privileges of my now glorified state, are all worth nothing to me but for thee ; please me only, as they make me fitter for thee. O the pleasure of these sentiments, the joy of such raptures; when the soul shall have no other notion of itself, than of an everlasting sacrifice, always ascending to God in its own flames. For this devotedness and subjection speak not barely an act, but a state ; a "^being to the praise of grace ; a living to God. And 'tis no mean pleasure that the sincere soul finds, in the imperfect beginnings, the first essays of this life, the initial breathings of such a spirit, its entrance into this blessed state ; when it makes the first tender and prosent of itself to God ; (as the apostle expresses it ;) when it first begins to esteem itself a hallowed thin?, separate and set apart for God ; its first act of unfeigned self-resig- nation ; when it tells God from the very heart, "I now give up myself to thee to be thine." Never was marriage- covenant made with such pleasure, with so complacential consent. This quitting claim to ourselves, parting with ourselves upon such terms, to be the Lord's for ever : O the peace, the rest, the acquiescence of spirit that attends it I When the poor soul that was weary of itself, knew not what to do with itself, hath now on the sudden found b T'l i^t aiiTO/wrEf TiOcjxtv, o tiovovfievov aiperov rroici tov fftoi', oai ftriSc V .? evocai. Arist. dc mor. lib. l. c. 4. c Rom. xii. I. dRom. vi. 13. e Ver. 16. this way of disposing itself to such an advantage ; there is pleasure in this treaty. Even the previous breakings and releniings of the .soul towaids God are pleasant. But O the pleasure of consent ! ofd yielding ourselves to God, as the apostle's expression is ; when the soul is overcome, and cries out, " Lord, now I resign, I yield ; possess now thy own right, I give up myself to thee." That j-ielding is subjection, .self-devoiing; in order to future service and obedience, ^To whom ye yield ourselves servants to obey &c. And never did any man enrol himself, as a servant to the greatest prince on earth, with such joy. What plea- sure is there in the often iterated recognition of these trans- actions ; in multijjlying such bonds upon a man's own soul (though done faintly, while the fear of breaking checks its joy in taking them on !) When in the uttering of these words, f I am thy servant, O Lord ; thy servant, the son of thine hand-maid, i. e. thy born-servant, (allud- ing to that custom and law- among the Jews,)? thy servant devoted to thy fear ; a man finds they fit his spirit, and are aptly expressive of the true sense of his .soul ; is it not a grateful thing "? And how pleasant is a state of life con- sequent and agreeable to such transactions and covenants with God ! When 'tis meat and drink to do his will ! When his zeal eats a man up ; and one shall find himself secretly consuming for God ! and the vigour of his soul exhaled in his service ! Is it not a pleasant thing bo to spend and be spent 1 When one can in a measure find that his will is one with God's, transformed into the Divine will: that there is but one common will, and interest, and end between him and us; and so, that in serving God we reign with him ; in spending ourselves for him, we are per- fected in him. Is not this a pleasant Ufe"? Some heathens have spoken at such a rate of this kind of life, as might make us wonder and blush. One speaking of a virtuous person saith, " iii/e is a good soldier that bears wovnds, and numbers scars; and at last, smitten through with darts, dying, will love the emperor for whom he falls ; he will (saith he) keep in mind that ancient precept, Follow God. But there are that complain, cry out and groan, and arc compelled by force to do his commands, and hurried into them against their will ; and what a madness is it (said he) to be drawn rather than follow !" And presently after sub- joins, " We are born in a kingdom ; to obey God is liberty." The same person writes in a letter to a friend : " ilf thou believe me when I most freely discover to thee the most secret fixed temper of my soul, in all things my mind is thus formed : I obey not God so properly as I assent to him. I fallow him with all my heart, not because I cannot avoid it." And another, " kLead me to whatsoever I am appointed, and I will follow thee cheerfully; but if I re- fuse, or be unwilling, I shall follow notwithstanding." A soul cast into such a mould, formed into an obedien- tial subject frame, what sweet peace doth it enjoy ! how pleasant rest! Every thing rests most composedly in its proper place. A bone out of joint knows no ease, nor lets the body enjoy any. The creature is not in its place but when 'tis thus subject, is in this subordination to God. By flying out of this subordination, the world of mankind is become one great disjointed body, full of weary toss- ings, unacquainted with ease or rest. That soul that is, but in a degree, reduced to that blessed state and temper, is as it were in a new world ; so great and happy a change doth it now feel in itself But when this transformation shall be completed in it; and the will of God shall be no sooner known than rested in with a complacential appro- bation; and every motion of the first and great Mover shall be an efficacious law, to guide and determine all our motions; and the lesser wheels shall presently run at the first impulse of the great and master-wheel, without the least rub or hesitation ; when the law of sin shall no longer check the law of God ; when all the contentions of a rebellious flesh, all the coimtcr-strivings of a perverse, ungovernable heart, shall cea. proaches therefore of the soul to God ; its most intimate union with him, and entire subjection to him in its glorified state, makes its liberty consummate. Now is its deliverance complete, its bands are fallen ofl'; 'tis perfectly disentangled from all the snares of death, in which it was formerly held; 'tis imder no restraints, oppressed by no weights, held down b}^ no clogs ; it hath free exercise of all its powers ; hath every faculty and affection at command. How unconceivable a pleasure is this! With what delight d(ith the poor prisoner entertain himself, when his manacles and fetters are knocked off! Avhen he is enlarged from his loathsome dungeon, and the house of his bondage ; breathes in a free air ; can dispose of himself, and walk at liberty whither he will ! The bird escaped from his cage, or freed from his line and stone, that resisted its vain and too feeble stragglings before; how pleasantly doth it range! with what joy doth it clap its M'ings, and take its flight ! A faint emblem of the joy, wherewith that pleasant cheerful note shall one day be sung and chanted forth. C)nr soul is escaped, as a bird out of the snare of the foAvler ; the .snare is broken and we are escaped. There is now no place for such a complaint, I would, but I cannot ; I would turn my thoughts to glorious objects, but I cannot. The blessed soul feels itself free from all confinement: nothing resists its will, as its will doth never resist the will of God. It knows no limits, no restraints; is not tied up to this or that particular good ; but expatiates freely in the immen.se, universal, all-comprehending good- ness of God himself And this liberty is the perfect image and likeness of the liberty of God, especially in its con- summate state. In is progress towards it, it increases as the soul draws nearer to God : which nearer approach is u Lilierfas nostra non e^t sutyectio ad Deum formalifer, sed amplitudo con- Beqiiens earn. Gibieuf. De libcrt. Dei et creatune. lib. 1. c. 32. X ftuam invexere isibi, adjuvant sa-\ituleni. Et .sunt, qiiodammodo, propria Libertate captivi. Boeth. ex Gib. Nectit qua valcattiuhi catenam. ?en. Trag. y Rom. vi. 20. z 2 Peter ii a Lil)erior quo divina; gratise subjectior. Priinum Libenim arbitrium, quod homini datum est, quando primum creatus est rectus, potuit non peccare ; sed potuit et peccare. Hoc antem no\-i8simum eo potent lus eril, quo peccare non potuit. Aug. de Civ itat. Dei. lib. 22 c. 30. b Libertas nostra inhseret di\infE. utexemplari. et in perpctua ejus imifatione versatur. sive ortum. sive progressum, sivc cinisunimatidnrni ', that he might be in us (that is, the same image that bears his name) our final consum- mate glory itself also: with what pleasure will these har- monious congruities, these apt correspondencies, be looked into at last ! Now may the glorified saint say, I here see the end the Lord Jesus came into the world for ; I see for what he was lift up, made a spectacle ; that he might be a transforming one: what the effusions of his Spirit were for; why it so earnestly strove with my wayward heart. I now behold in my own soul, the fruit of the travail cf his soul. This was the project of revoci. Greg. Nyss. in vertia Faciamus hominein, &c. Orat. l. a Matt. V. 6. b 1 Thess. v. 6. Eph. v. U. these two things, — 1. That its condition in this life, even at the best, is in some sort but a sleep: 2. That when it passes out of it into the invisible regions, 'tis truly said to awake. 1. Its abode in this mortal body, is but a continual sleep ; its senses are bound up; a drowsy slumber posses.'-es and suspends all its faculties and powers. Before the reno- vating change, how frequently doth the Scripture speak of sinners as men asleep! bLet not us sleep a.s do oihers. Awake thou that sleepest, and stand up from the dead, &c. They are in a dead sleep, under the sleep of death: they apprehend things a.s men asleep. How slight, obscure, hovering notions have they of the most momentous things ! and which it most concerns them to have thorough real apprehensions of! All their thoughts of God, Christ, hea- ven, hell, of sin, of holiness, are but uncertain, wild gues.scs, blind hallucination.s. incoherent fancies ; the absurdity and inconcinnity whereof, they no more reflect upon than men asleep. They know not these things, but only dream of them. They put darkness for light, and light for dark- ness; have no senses exercised to discern between good and evil. The mo.st substantial realities are with them mere shadows, and chimeras ; fancied and imagined dan- gers startle them, (as 'tis wont to be with men in a dream,) real ones, though never so near them, they as little fear as they. The creature of their own imagination, the lion in the" way, which they dream of in their slothful slumber, aff'rights them; but the real roaring lion that is ready to devour ihem, they are not afraid of And conversion doth but relax, and intermit; it doth not totally break off this sleep: it, as it were, attenuates the consopiting fumes, doth not utterly dispel them. What a difficulty is it to watch but one hour! There are some lucid and vivid intervals, but of how short continuance ! how soon doth the awakened soul close its heavy eyes and falls asleep again ! how often do temptations surprise even such, in their slumbering fits, while no sense of their dan- ger can prevail with them to w'atch and pray (with due care and constancy) lest they enter thereunto! -^Hitherare most of the sins of our lives to be imputed and relerred ; not to mere ignorance, that we know not sin from duty, or what will please God and what displease him ; but to a drowsy inadvertency, that we keep not our spirits in a watchful considering posture. Our eyes that should be ever towards the Lord, will not be kept open, and though w^e resolve, we forget ourselves ; before we are aware, we find ourselves overtaken ; sleep comes on upon us like an armed man, and we cannot avert it. How often do we hear, and read, and prav, and meditate as persons asleep, as if we knew not what we were about? How remarkable useful providences escape either our notice or due improve- ment, amidst our secure slumbers! How many visits from heaven are lost to us, when we are a-s it were, between sleeping and waking !'i I sleep, but my heart waketh, and hardly own the voice that calls upon us, till our beloved hath withdrawn himself 1 Indeed, what is the whole of our life but a dream"? the entire scene of this sensible world but a vision of the night ; where every man-^ walks but in a vain show 1 Where we are mocked with shadows, and our credulous sense abused by impostures and delusive appearances "? Nor are we ever secure from the most de- structive, mischievous deception, further than as our souls are possessed with the apprehensions, that this is the very truth of our case ; and thence instructed to consider, and not to prefer the shadows of time before the great realities of eterniiy. Nor is this sleep casual, but even connatural to our pre- sent state, the necessarv result of so strict a union and commerce with the bodv, which is to the in-dwelling spirit as a dormitory or charnel-house rather than a mansion. A soul drenched in sensualitv,) a Lethe that hath too little of fiction in it, and immured "in a slothful, putrid flesh, ^jeeps as it were by fate, not by chance, and is only capable of full relief by sufterinir a dissolution ; which it hath reason to welcome' as a jubilee, and in the instant of departure to sacrifice as he did, f (with that ea^y and warrantable c So well doth the apostle's watch-word suit our case. Awake to riffhteous- no^s. and sin not, &c. 1 Cor. xv. 34 , • , d ran' V 2 e Psal. xxnx. «. f V7-. Seneca. Wlw at the time of liis Ut ath sprinkled water upon the ser- 932 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. X. change, to make a heathen expression scriptural,) Jehoi-a. libcratori, to adore and praise its great Deliverer: at least (accounts being once made up, and a meetness in any mea- sure attained for the heavenly inheritance, &c.) hath no reason to regret or dread the approaches of the eternal day, more than we do the return of the sun after a dark and longsome night. But as the sluggard doth nothing more unwillingly than forsake his bed, nor bears any thing with more regret than to be awaked out of his sweet sleep, though you should entice him with the pleasures of a pa- radise to quit a smoky, loathsome cottage ; so fares it with a sluggish soul, as if it were lodged in an enchanted bed : 'tis so fast held by the charms of the body, all the glory of the other world is little enough to tempt it out, than which there is not a more deplorable symptom of this sluggish, slumbering state. So deep an oblivion (which you know is also naturally incident to sleep) hath seized it of its own country, of its alliances above, its relation to the Father and world of spirits, it takes this earth for its home, where 'tis both in exile and captivity at once : and (as a prince stolen away in his infancy and bred up in a beggar's shed) so little seeks, that it declines a better state. This is the degenerous, torpid disposition of a soul lost in flesh, and inwrapt in stupifying clay, which hath been deeply resented by some heathens. So one brings in Socrates pathetically bewailing this oblivious dreaming temper of his soul, " which (saith he) had seen that pulchritude (you must pardon him here the conceit of its pre-existence) that nei- ther human voice could utter, nor eye behold ; but that now, in this life, it had only some little remembrance thereof, as in a dream ; being both in respect of place and condition, far removed from so pleasant sights, pressed down into an earthly station, and there encompassed with all manner of dirt and filthiness, &c. And to the same purpose Plato often speaks in the name of the same person, and particularly of the winged slate of the good soul? when apart from the body, carried in its triumphant flying chariot, (of which he gives a large description, somewhat resembling Solomon's rapturous metaphor, ii " Before I was aware, my soul made me as the chariots of Ammina- dab ;") but being in the body, 'tis with it as with a bird that hath lost its wings, it falls a sluggish weight to the earth. Which indeed is the state even of the best, in a degree, within this tabernacle. A sleepy torpor stops their flight ; they can fall, but not ascend ; the remains of such drow- siness do still hang even about saints themselves. The apostle therefore calls upon such toi awake out of sleep ; from that consideration, (as we know men are not wont to sleep so intensely towards morning,) that now their salva- tion was nearer than when they believed, i. e. (as some vants about him, addita voce, se Uqnorem ilium libare Jovi lijjeratori. Tacit Aniial. e TT-repiOjia. In Ph«dro. h Cant, vi 13. i Rom. xiii. 11. k Aretius, Beza, &c. IPsal xxx. 5. m In his Saint's Rest. p. 2, c 10. n Luke xxiii. 43. o 2 Cor. v. 8. p Phil. i. 23. q Heb. xii 23. r 'Tis true, that divers of the fathers and others have spoken, some dubiously, Bome very diminishingly, of the blessedness of separate .souls ; many of whose word.s may be seen together in that elaborate tractate of the learned Parker, De Descena. 1 secund. p. 77 Yea, and his own assertion in that very page (be it spoken with reverence to the memory of so worthy a person) argues some- thing gross, and I conceive, unwarrantable tlwjughts of the soul's dependence on a body of earth. His words are Tertium viilnim. (speaking of tlie preju- dices the soul receives by its separation ftoui the budy.) onmes operationes etiam svoji, outE^untprasertiinad extra, extingiiit. Wliere he makes it a difliculty to allow it any operations at all, as appears by the prasertim insert- ed. He first indeed denies it all operations, and then, more confidently and especially, those ad extra. And if he would be understood to exclude it only from its operations ad extra, (if he takes operations ad extra as that phrase is wont to l)e taken,) he must then mean by it all such operations as have their objects, not only those that have their terms to which without the agent, i. e. not only all transient, but all imminent, acts that have their objects without them. As when we say, all God's acts ad ^xtra are free : we nn-an it even of his im- manent acts that have their objects without him. llviiifli they do not ponere tenninum extra Deum; as his election, hi.^ Icivi" of llie elect And so he must be understood to deny the separate snuN (and Ibiit with a pra-^ei-tim too) the operations ofknowing God, of loving him. anddilieliting in him ; which are all operations ad extra, as having their objects extra animmn, though their terminus ad quern be not so : which makes the condition of the separate souls of saints unspeakably inferior to what it was in the body, and what should occasion so dismal thoughts of that state of separation. I see not. Scripture gives no ground for them, but evidently enoughspeaks Ihe contrary. Reason and philosophy offer nothing that can render the sense we put upon the afore- mentioned plain scripture, self-contradictious or impossible. Yea, such as had no other light or guide, have thought the facility of the soul's operations, being separate from its earthly body, much greater by that very separation. And upon this score doth St. Augustine, with great indignation, inveigh against the philosophers, (Plato more especially.) because they judged the separation of the soul from the body necessary to its lili'^^i-dnoss. Qid rideUcet ejusper- feetam beatitudinem tunc illi Jleri e.rlnlhtwiit cxni nnnti prornis corpore exuta, ad Dctim simplex, etsola etr/'irylinnimKln iimln rlJierit, (De civif Dei. 1. 13 c 16. )unto which purpose the words ot PbilolausPythagoricus.of Plato.of Porphyrius, are cited by Ludovicus Vives, in his comment upon that above-men- judicious interpretersk understand that place,) for that they were nearer death and eternity than when they first became Christians; though this passage be also otherwise, and not improbably, interpreted. However, 2. The holy soul's release and dismission from its earth- ly body, which is that we propounded next to be con- sidered, will excuss and shake off this drowsy sleep. Now is the happy season of its awaking into the heavenly, vital light of God; the blessed morning of that long desired day is now dawned upon it, the cumbersome night-vail is laid aside, and the garments of salvation and immortal glory are now put on. It hath passed through the trouble and darkness of a wearisome night, and now is joy arrived wiih the morning, as we may be permitted to allude to those words of the i Psalmist, though that be not supposed to be the peculiar sense. I conceive myself here not con- cerned operously to insist in proving, that the souls of saints sleep not in the interval between death and the ge- neral resurrection, but enjoy present blessedness. It being besides the design of a practical discourse, which rather in- tends the propounding and improvement of things acknow- ledged and agreed, for the advantage and benefit of them wiih whom they are so, than the discussing of things du- bious and controversible. And what I here propound in order to a consequent improvement and application, should, methinks, pass for an acknowledged truth among them that professedly believe, and seriously read and consider, the Bible ; (for mere philosophers that do not come into this account, 'twere impertinent to discourse with them from a text of Scripture ;) and where my design only obliges me to intend the handling of that, and to deliver from it what may fitly be supposed to have its ground there, unless their allegations did carry with them the show of demon- strating the simple impossibility of what is asserted thence to the power of that God whose word we take it to be ; which I have not found any thing thej' say to amount to. That we have reason to presume it an acknowledged thing, among them that will be concluded by Scripture, That the soul (ioth not sleep when it ceases to animate its earthly body, many plain texts do evince, which are amassed to- gether by the reverend Mr. Baxter ;"> some of the princi- pal whereof I would invite any that waver in this matter seriously to consider: as the words of our Saviour to the thief on the cross," This day shalt thou be with me in pa- radise. That of the apostle," we are Willing rather to be absent from the body, and present with the Lord. And that,P I am in a strait, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ. That passage,<) The spirits of just men made perfect, &c. Which are expressions so clear, that it is hard for an industrious caviller to find what to"' except lioned passage. The first speaking t\ms—Deposito corpore kominem Deum rm- mortalemfieri. Thesecond Mwis—Trahinos a corpore ad iwa,et a cogitatiorte superarum rerwn subinde revocari: ideo relin/iuendiiin corpus, et hicquan- twm pnssuwus et in altera vitaprorsum, ut libcri et expediti, vervtn ipsi videamus et optimum amemiis. The third denies— AUteryi.eri beatv-m quen- qiiani posse, nisi relinqvat corpits et affigatitr Deo. I conceive it by tho way not improbable, that the severity of that pious father against the dogma of the philosophers, tnight proceed upon this ground, that what they said of the impossibiliiv nf liring happy in an earthly body, he unders'ood meant by them of an-inip(nsilijlity to be happy in any body at all ; when 'tis endently the com- mon opinion of the Pl.atonists, that the soul is always united with some body or other, and that even the daemons have bodies, (aerial or sEtherial ones,) which Plato himself is observed by St. Augustine to affirm, whenre he would fasten a contradiction on him. ibid not considering ('tis likely) that he would much less have made a difficulty, to concede such bodies also to human souls after they had lost their terrestrial ones, as liis sectatots do not ; who hold they tlien presently become daemons In the meantime 'tis evident enough, the doctrine of the separate soul's present blessedness, is not destitute of the patron- age and suffi-aee of philosophers. And 'tis indeed the known opinion of as ma- ny of them as ever held its immortality, (which all of all ages and nations have done, a very few excepted.) for inasmuch as they knew notliingof the resurrec- tion of the body, they could not dream of a sleeping intenal. And 'tis at least a shrewd presumption, that nothing in reason lies against it, when no one in- stance can he given, among them tliat professedly gave up themselves to its onlv guidance, of any one, that granting the immortality of the soul, and its separableness from its terre.strial body, ever denied the immediate blessednes.? of good souls in that state of separation. Nor (if we look into the thing itselt) is it at all more unapprehensible that the soul should be independent on the body in its operations than in its existence. If it be possible enough to form an un- exceptionable notion of a spiritual being distinct and sef.arable from any cor- poreal substance, (which the learned Doctor More hath sufficiently demon- strated in his treatise of the Immortality of the Soul,) with its prmier attributes, and powers peculiar to itself: what can reasonablji withhold me from asserting, that being separate from the body, it may as well operate alone, (I mean exert such operations as are proper to such a being.) as exist alone? That we find it here de facto, in its present state, acting only with dependence on aboily. will no more infer, that it can act no otherwise, than its present existence in a body will tlutt it can never e_xist out of it. neither whereof amounts to more than the trifliiiL'PMiloded argument « woness*' ad «»n posse, and would be as good sense as to sav. .-^nch a rme walks in his clothes, therefore out ofthem he cannot move a foot Yea. and the very use itself which the soul nowmakesof corporeal organs I and instruments, plainly evidences, that it doth exert some action wherein they Chap. X. THE BLESSEDNESS OP THE RIGHTEOUS. 223 to them; and, indeed, the very exceptions that are put in, arc so frivolous lliat they carry a plain confession there is nothing colourable to be said. Yea, and most evident it is from those texts, not only that holy souls sleep not, in that state of separation ; but that they are awaked i)y it, (as out of a former sleep,) into a much more lively and vigorous activity than they enjoyed befoie; and translated into a state as much better than their former, as the tor- tures of a cross are more ungrateful than the pleasures of a paradise; these joys fuller of vitality, than those sick- ly dying faintings ; as the immediate presence and close embraces of the Lord of life, are more delectable than a niournlbl disconsolate absence from him, (which the apos- tle therefore tells us he desired as far better, and with an emphasis which our English too faintly expresses: for he uses a double comparative, ttoXAu fiaXXov Kptiaaoi — by mvch more better ;) and, as a perfected, i. e. a crowned triumph- ant spirit, that hath attained the end of its race, (as the words import in the agonistical ^ notion,) is now in a more vivid joyous state, than when, lately, toiling in a tiresome way, it languished under many imperfections. And it is observable, that in the three former scriptures, that phrase, of being with Christ, or, being present with him, is the same which is used by the apostle, (1 Thess. iv. 17.) to express the state of blessedness after the resurrection ; in- timating plainly, the sameness of the blessedness before and after. And though this phrase be also used to signify the present enjoyment saints have of God's gracious pre- sence in this life ; which is also in nature and kind the same; yet it is plainly used in these scriptures (the two latter more especially) to set out to us such a degree of that blessedness, that in comparison thereof, our present being with Christ is a not-being with him ; our presence with him now, an absence from him: While we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord, and, I am in a .strait betwixt two, desiring to depart, (or having a de- sire unto dissolution,) and to be with Christ, &c. How strangely mistaken and disappointed had the blessed apos- tle been, had his absence from the body, his dissolution, his release, set him further oil" from Christ, or made him less capable of converse with him, than before he was ! And how absurd would it be to say, the spirits of the just are perfected, by being cast into a stupifying sleep; yea, or being put into any state, not better than they were in before ! But their stale is evidently far better. The body of death is now laid aside, and the weights of .sin, that did so easily beset, are shaken off ^ flesh and sin are laid down together; the soul is rid of its burthensome bands and shackles, hath quitted its filthy darksome prison, (the usual place of laziness and sloth,) is come forth of its drowsy dormitory, and the glory of God is risen upon it. 'Tis now come into the world of realities, where things appear as they are, no longer as in a dream, or vision of the night. The vital quickening beams of Divine light are darting in upon it on every side, and turning it into their own likeness. The shadows of the evening are va- nished, and fled away. It converses with no objects but what are full themselves, and most apt to replenish it with energy and life. This cannot be but a joyful awaking, a assist it not. For it supposes an nprration upon tlii>ni antpceilcnt to any opor- ation by them. Nothing can beth'- in^triiMimt wliich ii tk.I first tlip sulji-ct of my action ; as when I use a pen. I m-i iinim it in order to inv aelion hv it, L f. I impress a motion upon it, in order wliereiiiito I u.*e nnl that or any oiiii r such instrument ; and though I cannot proilircethe designed efi'eot. leave such charac- t<>re so and so figured, without it ; my hand can yet. without it, perform its own action, proper to itself, and produce many nobler effects When, therefore, the soul makes use of a bodily organ, its action upon it mivst needs at last tie with- out tlie ministry of any organ, unless you multiply to it body upon body '" hit!- nitinm. And if, possibly, it perform not some meaner and grosser pieces of drudgery when out of the liody, wherein it made iL«e of its help and service be- fore; that is no more a disparagement or diminution, than it is to the magis- trate, that law and decency permit him not to apprehenil or execute a male- factor with his own liand. It may yet perform those operations which are pro- per to itself: that is. such as are more noble and excellent, and immediately con- ducive to its own felicity. Which sort of actions, as cogitation for instance, and dilection, though being done in the body, there is conjunct w itli them an agi- tation of the sjiirits in the brain and heart : it yet seems' to me more reasona- ble, that as tn those acts, the spirits are rather subjects than instruments at all of tliem ; that the whole essence of these acts is antecedent to the motion of the spints ; and that motion cert.ainly (but accidentallv) conseoucnt, only by reason of the present, but soluble, imion the soul hath with the body And that the purity and refinedness of those spirits doth only remove what would hinder such acts, rather than contribute posit iveJy thereto. And so little is ttie alliance between a thought, and any bodily tiling, even those very finest snirits tliiio- 8clves : that I dare say whoev.->r s.'ts himself closely and strictly to consi- der and debate the matter with his own faeid'ies will find it much mor.' easily apprchoHiiible how the acts of intelleclionand volition may be t>erfonne(l \miIi- blesscd season of satisi"action and delight indeed, to the enlightened, revived soul. But, II. It must be acknowledged, the further and rore emi- nent season of this blessedness will be the general resur- rection day, which is more expressly signified in Scripture by this term of av-aking ; as is manifest in many plain texts, t where 'tis either expressly thus used, or implied to have this meaning in the opposite sen.se of the word sleep. What additions shall then be made to the saints blessed- ness, lies more remote from our apprehension ; inasmuch as Scripture states not the degree of that blessedness which shall intervene. We know, by a too sad instructive experience, the calamities of our present state, and can therefore more easi'y conceive, wherein it is capable of betterment, by the deposition of a sluggish, cumbersome body, where those calamities mostly have their spring: but then we know less where to fix our foot, or whence to take our rise, in estimating the additional felicities of that future state, when both the states to be compared are so unknown to us. But that there will be great additions is plain enough. The full recompense of obedience and devotedness to Christ, of foregoing all for him, is affixed by his promise to the resurrection of the just ; The judg- ment-day gives every one his portion according to his works. Then must the holy, obedient christian hear from his Redeemer's mouth, Come ye blessed of the father, in- herit the kingdom, &c. Till then the devils think their torment to be before their time. 'Tis when he shall appear we shall be like him, and see him as he is. That noted day is the day of being presented faultless with exceeding joy. And divers things there are obviously enough to be reflected on, which cannot but be understood to contribute much to the increase and improvement of this mchoate blessedness. The acquisition of a glorified body. For our vile bodies shall be so far transfigured, as to be made like " [conform toj the glorious bodyof the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ : and this shall be when he shall appear from heaven, where saints here below are required to have their commerce, as the enfranchised citizens there- of, and from whence they are to continue looking for him in the meantime. When he terminates and puts a period to that expectation of his saints on earth, then shall that great change he made, i. e. when he actually appears, at which time the trumpet sounds, » and even .sleeping dust itself awakes; the hallowed dust of them that slept in Jesus first, who are then to come with him. This change may well be conceived to add considerably to their felici- ty. A natural congruity and appetite is now answered and satisfied, which did either lie dormant, or was under somewhat an anxious restless expectation before; neither of which could well consist with a state of blessedness, every way already perfect. And that there is a real de- sire and expectation of this t^hange, seems to be plainly in- timated in those words of Job, y All the daj's of my ap- pointed time will I wait till my change come ; where he must rather be understood to speak of the resurrection than of death ; (as his words are commonly mistaken, and mi.sapplied;) as will appear by setting down the context from the seventh verse, for there is hope of a tree, if it be out those very corporeal spirits than by IJiem. However. euppo.»e them never so indisi>ensably necessarj- to those more noble operations of the soul, it may easily be furnished with Ihi-m. and in ereater pleiitv and puritv, fKim the am- bient air, -, that it should be able to do nothing- but sli>ep in tjie meanwhile. Whereas it seems a gn^at deal mon' unconcei' able, how such a being as the -oul is, once auit of the entanglements and encumbrances of the body, should sleep at all, than how it should act without th.- body. s .-^f)!' Dr Hammond's Annot in loc. t nan. xii. a. John xiv. 12. 2 Cor. xv. -2 Thess. iv. &c. ti M '"oyajiaTicsi, tTvuuooiior. Phil iii. 30, 01. .X 1 Tlie-ss iv. 14, 15, 16. y Chap. xiv. H. 224 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Ciup. XI. cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease. Though the root thereof wax old in the earth, and the slock thereof die in the ground: yet through the scent of water, it will bud and bring forth boughs like a plant. But man dieth and was- teth away ; yea, man giveth up the ghost, and Avhere is he 1 As the waters fail from the sea, and the flood decayeth, and drieth up ; so man lieth down, and raiseth not till the hea- vens be no more : they shall not be awakened nor raised out of their sleep. O that thou wouldst hide me in the grave, that thou wouldestkeep me secret till thy wrath be past, that thou wouldest appoint me a set time, and remem- ber me ! If a man die, shall he live again ? All the days of my appointed time will I wait tilt my change come. Thou shalt call, and I will ansM'er thee ; thou wilt have a desire to the work of thy hands. He first speaks accord- ing to common apprehension, and sensible appearance, touching the hopeless state of man in death ; as though it were less capable of reparation than that of some inferior creatures, unto the end of ver. JO. And then gradually discovers his better hope ; betrays this faith, as it were, obliquely, touching this point; lets it break out, first, in some obscure glimmerings, (ver. II, 12.) giving us, in his protasis, a similitude not fully expressive of his seeming meaning, for waters and floods that fail may be renewed ; and in his apodosis more openly intimating, man's sleep should be only till the heavens were no more : which till might be supposed to signify never, were it not for what follows, ver. 13, where he expressly speaks his confidence by way of petition, that at a set and appointed time, God would remember him, so as to recall him out of the grave : and at last, being now minded to speak out more fully, puts the question to himself. If a man die, shall he live again 1 and answers it, All the days of my appointed time, i. e. of that appointed time which he mentioned before, when God should revive him out of the dust, will I wait till ray change come ; i. e. that glorious change, when the cor- ruption of a loathsome grave should be exchanged for immortal glory; which he amplifies, and utters more expressly, ver. 15. Thou shalt call, and I will answer; thou shalt have a desire to the work of thy hands : Thou wilt not always forget to restore and perfect thy own crea- ture. And surely that waiting is not the act of his inanimate sleeping dust ; but though it be spoken of the person totally gone into hades, into the invisible state, 'fis to be understood of that part that should be capable of such an action ; q. d. I, in that part that shall be still alive, shall patiently await thy appointed time of reviving me in that part also, which death and the grave shall insult over (in a temporary triumph) in the meantime ; and so will the words carry a facile commodious sense, without the unne- cessary help of an imagined rhetorical scheme of speech. And then, that this waiting carries in it a desirous expec- tation of some additional good, is evident at first sight ; which therefore must needs add to the satisfaction and bless- edness of the expecting soul. And wherein it may do so, is notaltogether unapprehensible. Admit, that a spirit, had it never been embodied, might be as well without a body, or that it might be as well provided of a body out of other materials ; 'tis no unreasonable supposition, that a connate aptitude to a body, should render human souls more happy in a body sufficiently attempered to their most noble operations. And how much doth relation and pro- priety endear things, otherwise mean and inconsiderable 1 Or why should it be thought strange, that a soul connatu- ralized to matter, should be more particularly inclined to a particular portion thereof? so as that it should appropri- ate such a part, and say 'tis mine 1 And will it not be a pleasure, to have a vitality difflised through what even more remotely appertains to me, to have every thing be- longing to the suppositvvi perfectly vindicated from the tyrannous dominion of death"? The returning of the spi- rits into a benumbed or sleeping toe or finger, adds a con- tentment to a man which he wanted before. Nor is it hence necessary the soul should covet a re-union with every effluvious particle of its former body: a desire im- planted by God in a reasonable soul will aim at what is convenient, not what shall be cumbersome or monstrous. z 1 Cor. XV a 2 Thess i. 10 And how pleasant will it be to contemplate and admire the wisdom and power of the great Creator in this so glo- rious a change, when I shall find a clod of earth, a heap of dust, refined into a celestial purity and brightness '- when what was sown in corruption shall be raised in in- corruption ; what was sown in dishonour, is raised in glo- ry ; what was sown in weakness, is raised in power; what was sown a natural body, is raised a .spiritual body ! when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal, immortality, and death be wholly swallowed up in victor}^ ! So that this awaking may well be understood to carry that in it, which may bespeak it the proper sea- son of the saints' consummate satisfaction and blessedness. But besides what it carries in itself, there are other (more extrinsical) concurrents that do farther signalize this sea- son, and import a greater increase of blessedness then to God's holy ones. The body of Christ is now completed, the fulness of him that filleth all in all, and all the so near- ly related parts caimot but partake in the perfection and reflected glory of the whole. There is joy in heaven at the conversion of one sinner, though he have a trouble- some scene yet to pass over afterwards, in a tempting, wicked, unquiet world; how much more when the many sons shaJl be all brought to glory together ! The designs are all now accomplished, and wound up into the most glorious result and issue, whereof the Divine Providence had been, as in travail, for so many thousand years. 'Tis now seen how exquisite wisdom governed the world, and how steady a tendency the most intricate and perplexed methods of Providence had, to one stated and most worthy end. Specially the constitution, administration, and ends of the Mediator's kingdom, are now beheld in their exact aptitudes, order, and conspicuous glory ; when so blessed an issue and success shall commend and crown the whole undertaking. The Divine authority is now universally acknowledged and adored ; his justice is vindicated and satisfied; his grace demonstrated and magnified to the ut- termost. The whole assembly of saints solemnly acquit- ted b}"- public sentence, presented spotless and without ble- mish to God, and adjudged to eternal blessedness. 'Tis the day of solemn triumph and jubilation, upon the finish- ing of all God's works, from the creation of the world wherein the Lord Jesus* appears to be glorified in his saints, and admired in all that believe : upon which envies the resignation of the Mediator's kingdom, b (all the ends of it being now attained,) that the Father himself may be immediately all in all. How aptly then are the fuller ma- nifestations of God, the more glorious display of all his at- tributes, the larger and more abundant effusions of himself, reserved (as the best wine to the last) unto this joj'ful day ! Created perfections could not have been before so absolute, but they might admit of improvement ; their capacities not so large, but they might be extended further ; and then who can doubt but that divine communications may also have a proportionable increase, and that upon the concourse of so many great occasions they shall have so 1 CHAPTER XL An introduction to the use of the doctrine liitherto proposed. The use divided into Inferences of truth, Rules of duty. 1. Inference, That blessedness con- sists not in any sensual enjoyment. 2. Inference. The spirit of man (since 'tis capable of so high a blessedness) is a being of high excellency. Use. And now is our greatest work yet behind ; the im- provement of so momentous a truth, to the affecting and transforming of hearts ; that (if the Lord shall so far vouch- safe his assistance and blessing) they may taste the sweet- ness, feel the power, and bear the impress and image of it. This is the work, both of greatest necessity, difficulty, and excellency, and unto which, all that hath been done hi- therto, is but subservient and introductive. Give me leave, therefore, reader, to slop thee here, and demand of thee ere thou go further; hast thou any design, in turning over these leaves, of bettering thy spirit, of getting a more refined, heavenly temper of souH Art thou weary of thy dross and earth, and longing for the first fruits, the begin- nings of glory "? Dost thou wish for a soul meet for the b 1 Cor XV. 28. Chap. XI. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 225 blessedness hitherto described 1 What is here written is designed for thy help and lurlherancc. But if thou art looking on these pages with a wanton rolling eye, hunting for novelties, or what may gratify a prurient wit, a coy and squeamish fancy; go read a romance, or some piece of drollery : know here's nothing for thy turn ;^ and dread to meddle with matters of everlasting concernment with- out a serious spirit ; read not another line till thou liave sighed out this request, " Lord, keep me from trifling with the things of eternity.'' Charge thy soul to consider, that what thou art now reading; must be added to thy account against the great day. 'Tis amazing to think, with what vanity of mind the most weighty things of religion are entertained amongst Christians. Things that should swallow up our souls, drink up our spirits, are heard as a tale that is told, disregarded by most, scorned by too many. What can be spoken so important, or of so tremendous consequence, or of so confessed truth, or with so awful solemnity and premised mention of the sacred name of the Lord, as not to find either a very .slight entertainment or contemptuous rejection ; and this by persons avowing themselves Christians '! We seem to have little or no advantage, in urging men upon their own principles, and with things they most readily and professedly assent to. Their hearts are as much untouched, and void of impres- sion by the Christian doctrine, as if they were of another religion. How unlike is the Christian world to the Chris- tian doctrine ! The seal is fair and excellent, but the im- pression is languid, or not visible. Where is that serious godliness, that heavenliness, that purity, that spirituality, thai righteousness, that peace, unto which the Christian religion is most aptly designed to work and form the spi- rits of menl We think to be saved by an empty name; and glory in the show and appearance of that, the life and power whereof we hate and deride. 'Tis a reproach with us not to be called a Christian, and a greater reproach to be one. If such and such doctrines obtain not in our pro- fessed belief, we are heretics or infidels; if they do in our practice, we are precisians and fools. To be so serious, and circum.spect, and strict, and holy, to make the prac- tice of godliness so much our business, as the known and avowed principles of our religion do plainly exact from us, (yea, though we come, as we cannot but do, unspeak- ably short of that required measure,) is to make one's self a common derision and scorn. Not to be professedly reli- gious is barbarous, to be so in good earnest ridiculous. In other tilings men are wont to act and practise according to the known rules of their several callings and professions, and he would be reckoned the common fool of the neigh- bourhood that should not do so ; the husbandman that should sow when others reap, or contrive his harvest into the depth of winter, or sow fitches and expect to reap wheat ; the merchant that should venture abroad his most precious commodities in a lealry bottom, without pilot or compass, or to places not likely to afiford him any valuable return. In religion only it must be accounted absurd, to be and do according to its known, agreed principles, and he a fool that shall but practise as all about him profess to believe. Lord ! whence is this apprehended inconsistency between the profession and practice of religion 1 What hath thus stupified and unmanned the world, that serious- ness in religion should bethought the character of a fooH that men must visibly make a mockery of the most funda- mental articles of faith onlj^ to save their reputation, and be afraid to be serious lest they should be thought mad ? Were the doctrine here opened believed in earnest, were the due proper impress of it upon our spirits, or, (as the pagan moralist's expression is,h) were our minds transfi- gured into it, what manner of persons should we be in all holy conversation and godliness 1 But 'tis thought enough to have it in our creed, though never in our hearts ; and such as will not deride the holiness it should produce, yet endeavour it not, nor go about to apply and urge truths upon their own souls to any such purpose. What should turn into grace and spirit and life, turns all into notion and talk; and men think all is well if their heads be filled and a Dis3<)luti est pectoris in rebus seriis quserere voluptafem. Amob. 1) Srientiam qui didicit, et facicnda ct \itanda prsecepit, nondum sapiens est, ni.si in ea (luae didicit transfipirahis est animus. c Non prodeat cibus, m.-c conwri ucccdit, (jui stalim suniptiis emittitiir. Sen. Epi^t. their tongues tipt with what should transform their souls and govern their lives. How are the most awful truths, and that should have greatest power upon men's spirits, trifled with as matters only of speculation and discourse ! They are heard but as empty airy words, and presently evaporate, pass away into words again ; like food (as "^Se- neca speaks) t/uit cumes up presently, the same that it iras taken in ; which (as he saith) profits not, nor makes any ac- cession to the body at all. A like case, (as another ingeni- ously speaks,'i) o.s if sheep, when they liad been feeding, should present their shepherds with the very grass itself which they hud cropt, and shoio how much they liud eaten. No, .saith he, they concoct it, a/iid so yield them wool and milk. And so, saith he, do not you {viz. when you have been in- structed) presently go and utter words among the more ig- norant, (meaning they should not do so in a way of osten- tation, to show how much they knew more than others,) "but works that follow upon the concoction of what hath been by words made known to them." Let Christians be ashamed that they need this instruction from heathen teachers. Thy words were found and I did eat them, (saith the prophet,) and thy word was to mc the joy and rejoicing of my heart. Divine truth is only so far at present grateful, or useful for future, as 'tis received by faith and consider- ation, and in the love thereof, into the ver}' h?art, and there turned in succum et sangninem — into real nutriment to the soul ; so shall man live by the word of God. Hence is the application of it (both personal and ministerial) of so great neces.sity. If the truths of the gospel were of the same alloy with some parts of philosophy, whose end is attained as soon as they are known; if the Scripture doc- trine (the whole entire s)'stem of it) were not a doctrine afier godliness, if it were not designed to sanctifj' and make men holy ; or if the hearts of men did not reluctate, were easily receptive of its impressions; our work were as soon done as such a doctrine were nakedly proposed : but the state of the case in these respects is known and evident. The tenour and aspect of gospel truth speaks its end ; and ex- perience too plainly speaks the oppositeness of men's spirits. All therefore we read and hear is lost if it be not urgently applied : the Lord grant it be not then too. Therefore, reader, let thy mind and heart concur in the following im- provement of this doctrine, which will be wholly compre- hended under these two heads, — Inferences of truth, and — Rulesof duty, — that are consequent and connatural thereto. 1. Inferences of truth deducible from it. 1. Infer. True blessedness consists not in any sensual enjovment. The blessedness of a man can be but one ; most only one. He can have but one highest and best good. And its proper character is, that it finally satisfies and gives rest to his spirit. This the face and likeness of God doth ; his glory beheld and participated. Here then alone his full blessedness must be understood to lie. Therefore as this might many other ways be evinced to be true ; so it evidently appears to be the proper issue of the present truth, and is plainly proved by it. But, alas! it needs a great deal more to be pressed than proved. O that it were but as much considered as it is known ! The ex- perience of almost six thousand years, hath (one would think sufficiently) testified the incompetency of every worldly thing to make men happy ; that the present plea- sing of our senses, and the gratification of our animal part, is not blessedness; that men are still left unsatisfied not- withstanding. But the practice and course of the world are such, as if this were some late and rare experiment; which (for curiosity) every one must be trying over again. Every age renews the inquiry after an earthly felicity: the design is entailed, (as the Spanish designs are said to be.) and reinforced with as great a confidence and vigour from age to age, as if none had been baffled or defeated in it be- fore ; or that they were very likely to take at last. Had this been the alone folly of the first age, it had admitted some excuse ; but that the world should still be cheated by the same so oft repeated impostures, presents us with a sad prospect of the deplorable state of mankind.*^ This their d 'Erf( Kai ra -zpojiaTa, ov xoprov (pepov-a rots ^oipcoty crriSttKytvei iro- aovtcat y a\a icat ov TOivvv,pri ruxcoK pttpara rati tStioratf iiriSeiKici'r, oAXaar' avrtoy rr^ 9fvrtereiint, &c Auiz ilc Tiv Oil, 1 •i'i c. 24. p Nut thai thi^^ lilt'ssedness can beattairicill)v incri' liiirnan iTuIi^avours. (more whfroor.ji'r uiiiliT the next inference.) b' it Ihrrr is aiiiiicliiiatioii. a certain pon dimnaturiE, (as .some school-men speali,) by which it propcnds towards it ; or Iliore is the radix, or fundamrnf inn. or capncitas, (as some others,) f. e. that it not only may receive it ; but that it may be elevated by grace, actively to concur, by its natural powers, as \ital principles towards the attainment of it, according to t!iat known saying of Saint Augustine Posse credere natnne est hominis, i-c. they not with an heroic scorn turn away their eyes from beholding vanity, did they consider their own capacity of beholding the Divine glory ? could they satisfy themselves to become b like the beasts that perish, did they think of being satisfied with the likeness of God 1 And who can conceive unto what degree this aggravates the sin of man, that he so little minds (as it will their misery, that shall fall short of) this blessedness ! They had spirits capable of it. Consider, thou sensual man, whose happiness lies in colours, and tastes, and sounds, (as the moralist ingeniously speaks,) that herdest thyself with brute creatures, and aim- est no higher than they ; as little lookest up, and art as much a stranger to the thoughts and desires of heaven : thy creation did not set thee so low ; they are where they were ; but thou art fallen from thy excellency. God did not make thee a brute creature, but thou thyself Thou hast yet a spirit about thee, that might understand its own original, and alliance to the Father of spirits ; that hath a designa- tion in its nature to higher converses and employments. Many myriads of such spirits, of no higher original excel- lency than thy own, are now in the presence of the highest Majest}'^ ; are piying into the Eternal glory, contemplating the perfections of the Divine nature, beholding the un- vailed face of God, which transfuses upon them its own satisfying likeness. Thou art not so low-born, but thou mightest attain this state also. That sovereign Lord and Author of all things calls thee to it ; his goodness invites thee, his authority enjoins thee, to turn thy thoughts and designs this way. Fear not to be thought immodest or pre- sumptuous: ''tis but a dutiful ambition ; an obedient a.s- piring. Thou art under a law to be thus happy ; nor doth it bind thee to any natural impossibility ; it designs instruc- tions to thee, not delusion; guidance, not mockery. When thou art required to apply and turn thy soul to this blessed- ness, 'tis not the same thing as if thou wert bidden to re- move a mountain, to pluck down a star, or create a world. Thou art here put upon nothing but what is agreeable to the primeval nature of man ; and thorigh it be to a vast height, thou must ascend: 'tis by so easy and familiar me- thods, by so apt gradations, that thou will be sensible of no violence done to thy nature in all thy wa}'. Do but make some trials with thyself; thou wilt soon find nothing is the hinderance but an nnwilling heart. Try however (which will suffice to let thee discern thy own capacity, and will be a likely means to make thee willing) how far thou canst understand and trace the way (complying with it at least as reasonable) that leads to this blesseilness. Retire a little into thyself; forget awhile thy relation to this sensible world ; summon in thy self-reflecting and considering pow- ers : thou wilt presently perceive thou art not already hap- py, thou art in some part unsatisfied ; and thence wilt easily tinderstand, inasmuch as thou art not happy in thyself, that it must be something, as yet without thee, must make thee so : and nothing can make thee happy, but what is in that respect better than thyself; or hath some perfection in it, which thou findesl wanting in thyself A little fur- ther discourse or reasoning with thyself, will easily per- suade thee, thou ha.st something better about thee than that luggage of flesh thou goest with to and fro ; for thou well Imowest, thatk is not capable of reason and discourse : and that the power of doing so is a higher perfection than any thou canst entitle it to; and that therefore, besides thy bulky, material part, thou must have such a thing as a spi- rit or soul belonging to thee, to which that, and thy other perfections, not compatible to gross matter, may agree. Thou wilt readily assent, that thou canst never be happy, while thy better and more noble part is unsatisfied; and that it can only be satisfied with something suitable and connatural to it. That therefore thy happiness must lie in something more excellent than this material or sensible world, otherwise it cannot be grateful and suitable to thy soul, yea, in something that may be better, and more ex- h Volnptas honnm pecoris est Hunc tu (non dico infer viros scd) inter ho- mines numeia-s? cuius siimmum bonum saporibus, ac coloribus, ac sonis con- stat? cxcedat ex hoc animalium nnmoro pulcberrimo, ac diis secundo ; mutis ag^cgetur animal pabiilo natiim. Sen. Ep. 92. i Hie Deos aequat, illo tendit, originis suae meraor. Nemo, improlx", eo co- natur asccndere unde descenderat — socii eis sumus et membra, &c. Sen. Ep. 92. k \oytt7^o^ ?iZKatvov^^oVK£Ti raxna (Toypari St^byatp nvra^Kat •yapep')OV auriJi'OD (!i upyavoiv TtXttrat ron ooiiiaTOi Cfino^iov yap tovto, £»rif avro) ev rati (TKCif/cat npoxpMTo. Plotin. Ennead. 4. lib. 3. Chap. XII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 227 cellent than thy soul itself, otherwise how can it better and perfect that.i As thou canst not but acknowledge thy soul to be spiritual and immaterial, so if thou attend ihou wilt soon see cause to acknowledge a spiritual or immate- rial being, better and more perfect than thy own soul. For its perfections were not self-originate, they were therefore derived from something, for that reason confessedly more excellent ; whence at last also thou wilt find it unavoidably imposed upon thee, to apprehend and adore a Being abso- lutely perfect, and than which there cannot be a more perfect; the first subject and common fountain of all per- fections, which hath them underived in himself, and can derive them unio inferior created beings.™ Upon this eter- nal and self-essential Being, the infinitely lilessed God, thou necessarily dependest, and owest therefore constant subjection and obedience to him. Thou hast indeed of- fended him, and art thereby cut off" from all interest in him, and intercourse with him ; but he hath proclaimed in his gospel, his willingness to be reconciled, and that through the sutferings, righteousness, and intercession of his only- begotten Son, thy merciful Redeemer, the way is open for th)-^ restitution and recovery ; that thou mayst partake from him whatever perfection is wanting to thy blessedness. Nothing is required from thee in order hereunto, but that, relying on and submitting to thy Redeemer's gracious con- duct, thou turn thy mind and heart towards thy God, to know him, and conform to him; to view aad imitate the Divine perfections; the faithful endeavour and inchoation whereof, will have this issue and reward, the clear vision and full participation of them. So that the way and work differ not, in natttre and kind, from thy end and reward; thy duty from thy blessedness. Nor are either repugnant to the natural constitution of thy own soul. What violence is there done to reasonable nature in all this 1 or what can hinder thee herein, but a most culpably averse and wicked heart 1 Did thy reason ever turn off thy soul from God 1 was it not thj' corruption only 1 What vile images dost thou receive from earthly objects, which deform thy soul, while thou industriously avertest thy Maker's likeness that would perfect it ! How full is thy mind and heart of vanity! how empty of God! Were this through natural incapacity, thou wert an innocent creature; it were thj^ infelicity, (negative I mean,) not thy crime; and must be resolved into the sovereign will of thy Creator, not thy own disobedient will. But when this shall appear the true state of thy case, and thou shalt hear it from the mouth of th}^ Judge, " Thou didst not like to retain me in thy knowledge or love; thou hadst reason and will to use about meaner objects, but none for me; thou couldst sometimes have spared me a glance, a cast of thine eye at least, when thou didst rather choose it should be in the ends of the earth : a thought of me had cost thee as little, might as soon have been thought, as of this or that vanity; but thy heart was not with me. I banish thee, therefore, that presence which thou never lovedst. I deny thee the vision thou didst always shun, and the impression of my likeness which thou didst ever hate. I eternally abandon thee to the darkness and deformities which were ever grateful to thee. Thine is a self-created hell ; the fruit of thy own choice ; no invitations or persuasions of mine could keep thee from it." How wilt thou excuse thy fault, or avert thy doom! what arguments or apologies shall defend thy cause against these pleadings 1 Naj'', what ar- mour shall defend thy soul against its ow^n wounding self-reflections hereupon 1 when every thought shall be a dart ; and a convicted conscience an ever-gnawing worm, a fiery serpent with endless involutions ever winding about thy heart 1 It will now be sadly thought on, how often thou sawest thy way and declinedst it ; knewest thy duty and didst waive it ; vmderstoodest thy interest and didst slight it ; appro- vedst the things that were more excellent, and didst re- ject them. How often thou didst prevaricate with thy light, and run counter to thine own eyes; while things, 1 SicHt non est ac ame, spd super campm, ouod camem facit vivere : sic non est ab homme. «ed super hominem, quod hominem, facit beate vivere. D. Aug. de CiWt. Dei. lib. 19. c. 25. m Ut in ordine causanim efficientium, ita et in gradibus \irtutis et perfec- tioni?. non datur proereAsus in infinitmii : sed oportet sit aliqua prima et Fumma perfpciio: Pet. Molin de cocniiione Dei. Not to insist upon wlmt hath been much urged by learned men of farmer and latter (yea, and of the prvicir) confessedly most worthy of thy thoughts and pursuits, were overlooked, and empty shadows eagerly pursued. Thy own heart will now feelingly tell thee, ii was not want of capacity, but inclination, that cut thee off" from blessed- ness. Thou wilt now bethink th5'.self, that when life and immortality were brought to light before thy eyes in the gospel, and thou wast told of this future blessedness of the saints, and pressed to follow holiness, as without which thou couldst not see God ; it was a rea.sonable man was .spoken to, that had a power to understand, and judge, and choose ; not a stone or a brute. Thy capacity of this blessedness makes thee capable also of the most exquisite torment; and reflected on, actually infers it. How pas- sionately, but vainly, wilt thou then cry out, "O that I had filled up the place of any the meanest creature through- out the whole creation of God, that I had been a gnat, or a fly, or had never been, rather than to have so noble, abused powers eternally to reckon for ! Yea, and thou must reckon for not only the actual light and good impres- sions thou hadst, but even all thou wast capable of and mightest have attained. Thou shalt now recount with an- guish and horror (and rend thy own soul with the thoughts) what thou mightest now have been ; how excellent and glorious a creature ! hadst thou not contrived thy own misery, and conspired with the devil again.st thyself, how to deform and destroy thy own soul. While this remem- brance shall always afresh ret urn, that nothing was enjoined thee as a duty, or" propounded as thy blessedness, but what thou wast made capable of; and that it was not fatal ne- cessity, but a walful choice, made thee miserable. CHAPTER XII. Inference 3. That a change of heart is necessary to this blessedness. The pretences of ungodly men, whereby they would avoid the necessity of thia change Five considerations proposed in order to the delecting the vanity of such pretences. A particidar discussion and refutation ol those pre- tences. 3. 'Tis a mighty change must pass upon the souls of men in order to their enjoyment of this blessedness. This equally follows from the consideration of the nature and substantial parts of it, as of the qualifying righteousness pre-required to it. A little reflection upon the common state and temper of men's spirits, will soon enforce an acknowledgment that the vision of God, and conformity to him, are things above their reach, and which they are never likely to take satisfaction in, or at all to savour, till they become otherwise disposed than before the reno- vating change thev are. The text expresses no more in stating the qualified subject of this blessedness in rigUe- ousnfus, than it evidently implies in the account it gives of this blessedness itself, that it lies in seeing God. and being satisfied with his likeness. As soon as it is considered, that the blessedness of souls is stated here, what can be a more obvious reflection than this ; Lord, then how great a change must they undergo ! What, such souls he blessed in seeing and partaking the divine likeness, that never loved it ! were so much his enemies! 'Tis true they are naturally capable of it, which speaks their original excel- lency ; but they are morally uncapable, i e. indisposed and averse, whichas truly, and most sadly speaks, their present vileness; and the sordid, abject temper they now are of. They are destitute of no natural powers necessary to the attainment of this blessedness; but in the mean time have them so" depraved by impure and vicious tinctures, that they cannot relish it," or the means to it. They have rea- sonable souls, furnished with intellective and elective fa- culties, but labouring under a manifold distemper and dis- affection ; that theyb cannot receive, they cannot savour, the things of God, or what is spiritual. They want the ti'^ea'ta. (as we express it,) the well-disposedncss for the kingdom of Gfod, intimated Luke ix. 62. the 'iKavorin, time.— that whossoever denies the existence of an absolute perfect being, con- tradicts himself in the denial, inasmucli as necessity of existence is included in tlie very suliiecl of the ne^tion, — some accounting it sophism, and it beiop uiiso!i.i \'idetnr hat)ore, nisi ad Deumretulcrit, etiam iosa ntia suntpotius qnam virtutes. Aug. de Civit. Dei, 1. 19. r. 25. i; Matt, xxiii. 37. See Psal. Ix.vxi. 8—13. Prov. i. »)— w, &c. Hos. jii. 4. Chap. XII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 231 at the feet of a man that may help or hurt them ; while still the same persons retain indomitable unyielding spirits towards God, under their most afflictive pressure. Though his gracious nature and infinite fulness promise the most certain and liberal relief, 'tis the remotest thing from their thoughts to make any address to him. hThey cry because of (he oppression of the mighty, but none says. Where is God my Maker, who giveth songs in the night 1 rather perish under their burthens than look towards God, when his own visible hand is against them, or upon them, and their lives at his mercy; they stand it out to the last breath; and are more hardly humbled than consumed; sooner burn than weep; shrivelled up into ashes sooner than melted into tears; i scorched with great heat, yet re- pent not to give glory to God ; gnaw their tongues for pain, and yet still more disposed to blaspheme than pray or sue for mercy. Dreadful thought ! As to one another reconciliations among men are not impossible or unfre- quent, even of mortal enemies; but they are utterly im- placable towards God ! Yet they often wrong one another: but they cannot pretend God ever did them the least wrong, yea, they have lived by his bounty all their days. They say to God, " Depart from us," yet he filleth their houses with good things. So true is the historian's i< obser- vation, " Hatred is sharpest where most unjust." Yea, when there seems at least to have been a recon- ciliation wrought, are treacheries, covenant breakings, revolts, strangeness, so frequent among men towards one another, as from them towards God 1 How inconsistent with friendship is it, according to common estimate, to be always promising, never performing ; upon any or no oc- casion to break off intercourses, by unkind alienations or mutual hostilities ; to be morose, reserved each to other ; to decline or disaffect each other's converse; to shut out one another from their hearts and thoughts. But how common and unregretted are these carriages towards the blessed God ! It were easy to expatiate on this argument, and multiply instances of this greater disaffection. But in a word, what observing person may not see, what serious person would not grieve to see, the barbarous sooner put- ting on civility; the riotous, sobriety; the treacherous, fidelity; the morose, urbanity; the injurious, equity; the churlish and covetous, benignity and charity ; than the un- godly man, piety and sincere devotedness unto God 1 Here is the principal wound and distemper sin hath infected the nature of man with : though he have suffered a uni- versal impairment, he is chiefly prejudiced in regard of his habitude and tendency towards God, and what concerns the duties of the first table. Here the breach is greatest, and here is the greatest need of repair. True it is, an inoffensive, winning deportment towards men, is not without its excellency, and necessity too. And it doth indeed unsufferably reproach Christianity, and unbecome a disciple of Christ; j^ea, it discovers a man not to be led by his Spirit, and so to be none of his; to indulge himself in immoral deportments towards men ; to be un- dutiful towards superiors ; unconversable towards equals ; oppressive towards inferiors ; unjust towards any. Yet is a holy disposition of heart towards God most earnestly and in the first place to be endeavoured, (which will then draw on the rest,) as having in it highest equity and ex- cellency, and being of the most immediate necessity to our blessedness. Fifthly, Consider, that there may be some gradual ten- dencies, or fainter essays, towards godliness, that fall short of real godliness, or come not up to that thorough change and determination of heart Godward, that is necessary to blessedness. There maj'' be a returning, but not to the Most High, I and wherein men maybe (as the prophet im- mediately subjoins) like a deceitful bow, not fully bent, that will not reach the mark; they come not home to God. Many may be almost persuaded, and even within reach of heaven, not far from the kingdom of God ; may seek to enter, and not be able ; their hearts being somewhat in- clinable, but more averse ; for they can onlv be unable as they are unwilling. The soul is in no possibility of taking up a complacential rest in God, till it be brought to this, h Job xxxv. i Rpv. \\i. k Tacitus speaking of the hatred of Tilx'rius und Augiista against Gemiaiii- eus, the causers whereof, saith he, wcro acriorcs, tjuia iniquie. to niove toward him spontaneously, and with, as it were, a self-motion. And then is it self-moved towards God, when its preponderating bent is towards him. As a ma.ssy stone that one attempts to displace, if it be heaved at till it pre- ponderate, it then moves out by its own weight; other- wise it reverts, and lies where and as it did before. So 'tis with many men's hearts, all our lifting at them is but the rolling of the returning stone; they are moved, but not re- moved : sometimes they are lifted at in the public ministry of the word; sometimes by a private, sea.sonable admo- nition ; sometimes God makes an affliction his minis- ter ; a danger startles them; a sickness shakes thern ; and they think to change their course: but how soon do they change those thoughts, and are where they were ! What en- lightenings and convictions, what awakenings and terror, what remorses, what purposes, what tastes and reli.shes, do some find in their own hearts, that yet are blasted and come to nothing ! How many miserable abortions after travailing pangs and throes, and fair hopes of a happy birth of the new creature ! Often somewhat is produced that much resembles it, but is not it. No gracious principle but may have its counterfeit in an ungracious heart; whence they deceive not others onh', but themselves, and think verily they are true converts while they are yet in their sins. How many wretched souls, that lie dubiously struggling a long time under the contrary alternate impressions of the gos- pel on the one hand, and the present evil world on the other; and give the day to their own sensual inclinations at last! In some degree,™ escape the corruptions of the world, by the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, but are again entangled and overcome, so as their latter end is worse than their beginning. Such a man is so far from being advantaged by his former faint inclina- tions towards God, that he M'ould be found at last under this aggravated wickedness beyond all other men ; that when others wandered from God through inadvertency and inconsideration, this man will be found to have been his enemy upon deliberation, and against the various strivings of his convinced heart to the contrary. This is more eminent!}^ victorious and reigning enmity ; such a one takes great pains to perish. Alas 'lis not a slight touch, an overly superficial tincture, some evanid senti- ments of piety, a few good thoughts or wishes, that be- speak a new man, a new creature. 'Tis a thorough pre- vailing change, that quite alters the habitual posture of a man's soul, and determines it towards God, so as that the after-course of his life may be capable of that denomina- tion, a living to God, a living after the spirit ; that exalts the love of God into that supremacy in him, that it be- comes the governing principle of his life, and the reason and measure of his actions; that as he loves him above all things else, better than his own life, so he can truly (though possibly sometimes with a doubtful, trembling heart) re- solve the ordinary course of his daily walking and practice into that love, as the directive principle of it. 1 pray. I read, 1 hear, because I love God. I desire to be just, sober, charitable, meek, patient, because I lore God. This is the perfection and end of the love of God, (there- fore that must needs be the principle hereof.) obedience to his will.n Herein appears that power of godliness de- nied (God knows) by too many that have the form : the spirit of lov^e, power, and of a sound mind. That only is a sound mind in which such love rules in such power. Is not love to God often pretended by such that, whenever it comes to an actual competition, discover they love their ovm flesh a great deal more"? that seldom ever cross their own wills to do his, or hazard their own fleshly interest to promote his interest 1 We may justly say. (as the apostle, in a case fitly enough reducible hither,)" how dwells the love of God in that man"? Notwithstanding such a sub- dued ineffectual love to God, such a one shall be denomi- nated and dealt with as an enemy. 'Tis not likely any man on earth hates God so perfectly as those in hell. And is not every quality, not yet perfect in its kind, and that is yet grow- ing more and more intense, in the meantime allayed by some degree of its contrarj'"? Yet that over-masicred de- gree denominates not its subject, nor ought a man from 1 Hos. \'ii. 16. n John ii. 5. TtrfXfiojrai. m SPet. il o 8 Tim. iii. 5. chap. J. 239 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XII. such a supposed love to God to have the name of a lover of him. That principle is only capable of denominating the man, that is prevalent and practical, that hath agovern- ing influence on his heart and life. He in whom the love of God halh not such power and rule, whatever his fainter inclinations may be, is an ungodly man. And now melhinks these several considerations com- pared and weighed together, should contribute something to the settling of right thoughts in the minds of secure sinners, touching the nature and necessity of this heart- change; and do surely leave no place for the foremen- tioned vain pretences that occasioned thera. For (to give you a summary view of what hath been propounded in those foregoing considerations) it now plainly appears, — That the holy Scripture requires in him that shall enjoy this blessedness, a mighty change of the very temper of his soul, as that which must dispose him thereto; and which must therefore chiefly consist, in the right framing of his heart towards God; towards whom it is most fixedly averse, and therefore not easily susceptible of such a change. And that any slighter or more feeble inclina- tion toward God will not serve the turn ; but such only whereby the soul is prevalently and habitually turned to him. And then what can be more absurd or unsavoury, what more contrary to Christian doctrine, or common reason, than instead of this necessary heart-change, to in- sist upon so poor a plea, as that mentioned above, as the only ground of so great a hope 1 How empty and frivo- lous will it appear in comparison of this great soul-trans- forming change, if we severally consider the particulars of it. As for orthodoxy in doctrinals, 'tis in itself a highly laudable thing; and in respect of the fundamentals (for therefore are they so called) indispensably necessary to blessedness. As that cannot be without holiness, sonor holiness without truth.? But, (besides that this is that which every one pretends to,) is every thing which is ne- cessary sufftcienf? As to natural necessity, (which is that we now speak to,) reason and intellectual nature are also necessary; shall therefore all men, yea, and devils too, be saved 1 Besides, are you sure you believe the grand arti- cles of the Christian religion'l Consider a little, — the grounds and effects of that pretended faith. First, Its grounds. Every assent is as the grounds of it are. Deal truly here with thy soul. Can you tell where- fore you are a Christian 1 What are thy inducements to be of this religion! are they not such as are common to thee with them that are of a false religion? (I am here hap- pily prevented by a worthy author,- Gospel is the power of God to p John xvii 17. q Mr. Pink's Trial of sincere love to Christ. r Rom. 1. 10. 1 Thes. u. la s Heb. vi. t Rom. vi. 17. u Matt \ix. X 1 .John vi. y That moral incapacity is also in some sense tnilv natural, that is, in the M-iiie scn-se vvliPrfin wp are said to be by nature the childrrn of WTatli, Eph. ii. 3. Theretnre human natme miL-st be considered as created by God. and a^ pro- Pasa'ed by man. In tlu- fomipr sen.se, as God is the author of it. 'tis taken in this distinction, of moral and natural impotoQcv, which needs not furtlier expli- salvation to every one that believes ; to them that believe it not, it signifies nothing. The word of God received with a divine faith, as the word of God, works effectually upon all that so receive it, i. e. all that believe. What such efficacious workings of it hast thou felt upon thy soul 1 Certainly, its most connatural efl^ect is that very change of heart, and inclination Godward, of which we have been speaking. What is so suitable to the gospel- revelation, as a good temper of heart Godward ? Ani how absurd is it to introduce the cause on purpose to ex- clude its genuine inseparable effect! But evident it fs, (though true faith cannot,) that superficial, irrational assent, in wliich alone many glory, may too well consist with a disaffected heart towards God : and can it then signify any thing towards thy blessedness ? Sure to be so a solifi- dian is to be a nullifidian. Faith not working by love is not faith ; at least profits nothing. For thy outward con- formity in the solemnities of worship, 'tis imputable to so corrupt motives and principles, that the thing itself, ab- stractively considered, can never be thought characteristical and distinguishing of the heirs of blessedness. The worst of men may perform the best of outward duties. Thy most glorious boasted virtues, if they grow not from the proper root, love to God, they are but splendid sins, a.s above appears, and hath been truly said of old. Thy re- pentance is either true or false ; if true, it is that very change of mind and heart I speak of, and is therefore eminently signalized by that note, 'tis repentance towards God; if false, God will not be mocked. For thy regene- ration in baptism ; " what can it avail thee, as to this blessedness, if the present temper of thy heart be unsuit- able thereto? Didst thou ever know any that held, that all the baptized should be saved ? Will thy infant sanc- tity excuse the enmity and disaffection to God of thy riper age? In short, if we seclude this work of God upon the soul, how inconsiderable is the difference between the Christian and the heathen world! Wherein can it then be under- stood to lie, but in some ineffectual notions, and external observances? And can it be thought that the righteous, holy God, will make so vast a difference in the states of men hereafter, who differ so little here? or that it shall so highly recommend a man to God, that it was his lot to be born, and to have lived upon such a turf or soil, or in such a clime or part of the world ? His gracious providence is thankfully to be acknowledged and adored, ihat hath assigned us our stations under the Gospel : but then it must be remembered, the Gospel hath the goodness, not of the end, but of the means ; which, as by our improvement or non-improvement, it becomes effectual or ineffectual, doth acquit from, or aggravate, condemnation : and that it works not as a charm or spell, we know not how, or why, or when we think not of it ; but by recommending itself, in the demonstration and power of the Holy Ghost, to our reason and consciences, to our wills and affections,' till we be delivered up into the mould or form of it. Surely were it so slight a matter, as too many fondly dream, that must distinguish between them that shall be saved and shall perish, there would need no striving to enter in at the strait gate ; and the disciple's question would never have been, Who then shall be saved? but rather. Who shall not be saved? nor would it have been resolved by our Saviour into the immediate power of him alone," to whom all things are possible, that any are saved at all; nor have been so earnestly asserted by him, that "none could come to him hut whom his Father draws. The obvious import of which passages is such, that if careless sinners could once obtain of themselves seriously to consider them, methinks they would find little rest in their spirits, till they might discern a work wrought there, in some degree worthy of God ; an impression some way proportionable to the power of an almighty arm, and that might speak God its author. For notwithstanding the soul's natural capa- cities before asserted and inferred, its y moral incapacity, cation ; yet you may take this account of it from Dr. Twisse. Impofenfia fa- ciendi (|uod Deo pratum est et acreiitinn. non est impotentia natur to make us partakers of his holiness. And (as well it might) 'tis in- stanced as an efl^ect and argument of love, (for sure chas- tening itself, abstracted from that end of it, doth not import love,) whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, — and then by and by, in the same series and line of discourse, is added, — to make us partakers of his holiness. Love alwaj's either supposes similitude, or intends it; and is sufficiently argued by it either way. And sure, the love of God cannot be more directly expressed, than in his first intending to make a poor sonl like him, while he loves it with compassion ; and then imprinting and perfecting that likeness, that he may love it with eternal delight. Love is here the first and the last, the beginning and end in all this busmess. CHAPTER XIV. 7. Inference. That since tliis blessedness is limited lo a qualified subject, " I in righteousness," the unrighteous are necessarily left excluded. 8. Inference. That righteousness is no vain thing, ina.smuch as it hath so happy an issue, and ends so well. 7. Infer. Considerino this blessedness is not common, but limited to a qualified subject, " I in righteousness," a person clothed in righteousness ; it evidently follows, the unrighteous are necessarily excluded and shut out, can have no part nor portion in this blessedness. The same thing that the apostle tells us, without an inference ; "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God, &c. Intimating that to be a most confessed known thing : know ye not 1 is it possible ye can be ignorant of this! The natural necessit}' of what hath been here in- ferred, hath been argued already from the consideration g 1 John ii. ult. h iii. 1. i Ilcb, .vii. of the nature of this blessedness. The legal necessity of it, ari.sing from the Divine will and law, is that I mamly intend at present. By such a necessity also, they are exclil- ded, who by God's rule (according to which the supreme judgment must be managed) shall be found unrighteous: those that come not up to the terms of the gospel-covenant ; never accepted the oilers, nor submitted to the commands of it ; and that hence consequently are unrelated to Christ, and ununited to him; no way capable of advsmtage by his most perfect and all-sufficient righteousness, that alone fully answers all the exactions and demands of the cove- nant of works : and so, who are at last found unrighteous by the old law and the new, the law both of the Creator and Redeemer too. There is the same necessity these should be excluded, as that God should be just and true. The word is gone forth of his mouth in righteou.sness, and cannot return. He did not dally with sinners, when he settled those constitutions, whence this necessity results. He is not a man, that he should lie ; nor the son of man, that he should repent. A heathen understood so much of the nature of God. I have thought sometimes, with much wonder, of the stupid folly of unsanctified hearts ; they are even con- founded in their own wishes; and would have (in order to their security) they know not what. Were the question faithfully put to the very heart of such a one, What wouldst thou have done in order to thy eternal .safety from Divine wrath and vengeance 1 would not the answer be, O that God would re-call those severe constitutions he nath made; and not insist so strictly on what he halh required in the gospel, in order to the salvation of sinners. But foolish wrelch ! dost thou know what thou sayest? wouldst thou have God repeal the Gospel, that thou rnayst be the more secure 1 in what a case art thou then 1 Hast thouno hope if the gospel stand in force 1 what hope wilt thou have if it do not f Must the hopes of all the world be ruined to establish thine 1 and yet leave them involved in the com- mon ruin too 1 What but the go.spel gives the least hope to apostate sinners'? There is now hope for thee in the gospel-promise, if thou return to God. tLet the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts - and let him turn to the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him ; and to our God, and he will abundantly pardon. But take away the gospel, and where art thou 1 Were it pos- sible for thee to repent, and become a new man ; what set- tles the connexion between repentance and salvation, but the gospel-promise 1 Will the violated law of works ac- cept thy repentance instead of obedience 1 Doth it not ex- pressly'preclude any such expectation 1 Doth it give any ground to look for any thing but death after sin 1 Thou must therefore fly to the Gospel, or yield th5'self lo*.t. And know, it contains none but faithful and true sayings, that have more stability in them than the foundations of heaven and earth : therefore expect notliing to be altered for thy sake. The gospel-constitution was settled long before thou wast born : thou comest loo late with thy exceptions (if thou hadst any) asrainst it. Remember therefore this is one of the ui alterable determinations of this gospel, with- out holiness thou shall never see God, or (which amounts to the same) thou canst not behold his face but in right- eousness. There is no word in all the Bible of more cer- tain truth than this. In this also how apt are sinners fool- ishly to entangle themselves ! The Gospel is true, and to be believed, till they meet with something that crosses them, and goes against the hair, and then they hope it is not so. But vain man ! if once thou shake the truth of God, what wilt thou stay thyself upon 1 Is God true when he promises 1 and is lie not as true when he threatens? If that be a tnic saving, " Say to the righteous, it shall be well with him," — is not that as much to be regarded, " Wo to the wicked, it shall be ill with him 1 The right- eousness of the risrhteous shall be upon him. and the wick- edness of the wicked shall he upon him." Are not these of equal authority 1 If thoTi hadst any reason to hope tboii mayst be happy though thou never be righteous ; is there not" as much i-eason^ to fear thou mightst be miserable though thou be ; since the one is as much against the flat express word of God as the other"? Let not thy love to sin betray thee out of all religion and thy wits together. a 1 Cor. vi. b Isa. Iv. 336 THE BLESSEDNESS OP THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XIV. Wherein wilt thou beliere one upon the bare value of his word, that will lie to thee in any thing! Yea, and as it is the same authority that is affronted in every command, whence disobedience to one is a breach of all ; so is the same vera'city denied in every truth, and the disbelief of one belies all; and wilt thou believe him in any thing, thou hast proclaimed a liar in every thing 1 Therefore, so little hast thou gained by disbelieving the divine revelation in this thing, that thou hast brought thyself to this miserable dilemma; If the word of God be false, thou hast no fotm- datmn of any faith left thee ; if it be true, it dooms thee to eternal banishment from his blessed face, while thou re- mainest in thy unrighteousness. It will not be thy advan- tage then to disbelieve this gospel-record, but to consider it "and take it to heart ; 'twill prove never the less true at last, fur that thou wilt not believe it ; shall thy unbelief make the truth of God of none effect 1 And if thou wouldst but reasonably consider the case, methinks thou shouldst soon be convinced. Since thou acknowledgest (as I sup- pose thee to do) that there are two states of men in the other world, a state of blessedness, and a state of misery ; and two sorts of men in this world, the righteous and the unrighteous ; let thy reason and conscience now judge who shall be allotted to the one state, and who to the other. Sure, if thou acknowledge a righteous Judge of all to the world, thou canst not think he will turn men piomiscu- ously into heaven or hell at random, without distinction ; much less canst thou be so absurd and mad, as to think all the unrighteous shall be saved, and the righteous perish. And then what is left thee to judge but that which I am now urging upon thee, that when the righteous shall be admitted to the vision of God's blessed face, the unright- eous shall be driven forth into outer darkness. It may be some here will be ready to say, " But to what purpose is all this, they were of the same mind before, and cannot think that any one would ever say the contra- ry." Nor do I think so either ; but 'tis one thing not to be- lieve a conclusion to be true, and another to profess a con- trary belief; and one thing to believe a conclusion, ano- ther to think we believe it. Men often know not their own minds. In practical matters, 'tis best known what a man's belief is by his practice: for when any profess to believe this or that practical truth, relating to their salvation, if they believe it not practically, i- e. with such a belief as will command their suitable practice, it matters not what belief they are of, or whether they were of that judgment or no: yea, it will prove in the issue better for them they had been of another, when their own professed belief shall be urged against them. But let us consider a little, how in practical matters of less concernment we would estimate a man's belief You meet a traveller upon the way, who tells you, the bridge over such an unpassable river is broken dov/n, and that if you venture you perish ; if you believe him, you return ; if you hold on, he reasonably concludes you believe him not; and will therefore be apt to say to you, if you will not believe me you may make trial. Your physician tells you a disease is growing upon you, that in a short time will prove incurable and mortal, but if you presently use the means he shall prescribe, 'tis capable of an easy remedy; how would yoti yourself have your be- lief of your physician judged of in this case 1 Would you expect tobe believed, if you should say, you do not at all dis- trust your physician's integrity and judgment, but yet you resolve not to" follow his directions ; unless you would have us believe too, that you are weary of your life, and would fain be rid of if? There is no riddle or mystery in this. How ridiculous would men make themselves, if in mat- ters of common concernment they should daily practise di- rectly contrary to their professed belief! How few would Believe them serious, or in their wits'? But however, call this believing, or what you will, we contend not about the name ; the belief of such a thing can no further do you pood, you can be nothing the better for it, further than as it engages 5^ou to take a course suitable and consequent to such a belief To believe that there is a hell, and run into it; that unrighteousness persisted in will damn you, and yet will live in it. To what purpose is it, to make your boasts of this faith 1 But since you are willing to call this believing: all the foregoing reasoning is to engage you to c Job XXXV, consider what you believe. Do you believe that unright- eousness will be the death of your soul ; will eternally se- parate you from God, and the presence of his glory 1 and when you have reasoned the matter with yourself, you find it to be certainly so : should not ':ach a thing be more deeply pondered 1 The bare proposal of an evident truth commands present assent ; but if I further bend my mind to reason out the same thing to myself, I am occasioned to take notice of the grounds, dependencies, the habitudes of it, what it rests upon, and whither it tends, and thence more discern its importance, and of what moment it is, than I should have done, if upon first view I had Eissented only, and dismissed it my thoughts. And yet is it po.ssi- ble, you should think this to be true, and not think it a most important truth 1 Is it a small matter in your ac- count, whether you shall be blessed or miserable for ever! whether you be saved or perish eternally ! Or is it consi- dered by you, according as the weight of the matter re- quires, that as you are found righteous or rmrighteous, so will it everlastingly fare with you 1 You may possibly say, you already conclude yourself righteous, therefore no further employ your thoughts about it. But methinks, you should hardly be able however to put such a thing out of your thoughts ; while as yet the final determination is not given in the case. If a man have a question yet depending, concerning his life or estate ; though his business be never so clear, he will hardly forget it, the trial not being yet past. And though in this matter, you have no reason to suspect error or corruption in your Judge, (through which many honest causes may miscarry in a human judicature,) yet have you no reason to suspect yourself! If the Holy Spirit hath assured you, it hath not stupified you; but as you have then the less of fear, you have the more of love and joy. Therefore you will not thence mind such a concernment the less, but with the more delight ; and therefore also, most probably, with the more frequency and intension. What a pleasure will it be to review evidences, and say, Lo! here are the medi- ums by which I make out my title to the eternal inherit- ance. Such and such characters give me tne confidence to number myself among God's righteous ones. And do you lead that heavenly raised life 1 do you live in those sweet and ravishing comforts of the Holy Ghost, that may be.'^] eak you one whom he hath sealed up to the day of redemption 1 If you pretend not to any such certainty, but rely upon your own judgment of your case ; are you sure you are neither mistaken in the notion of the righteousness required, nor in the application of it to )'^our own soul 1 Possibly, you may think yourself, because in your ordinar}^ dealing you wrong no man, (yourself being judge,) a very righteous person. But evident it is, when the Scripture uses this term as descriptive of God's own people, and to distinguish be- tween them that shall be saved and perish, it takes it in that comprehensive sense before explained. And, however, it requires at least much more of thee, under other expres- sions, as thou canst hardly be so ignorant but to know. And do but use thy reason here a little, and demand of thyself: Is he to be accounted a righteous person, that thinks it fit to avoid wronging a man, but makes no con- science at all of wronging God 1 More particularly : Is it righteous, to live all thy days in a willing ignorance of the Author of thy being, never once to inquire, >= Where is God my Maker 1 Is it righteous to forget him days without number, not to have him from day to day in all thy thoughts'? Is it righteous to estrange thyself from him, and live as without him in the world, while thou livest, movest, and hast thy being in him 1 not to glorify him in whose hands thy breath is ? to be a lover of pleasure more than God! a worshipper, in thy very soul, of the creature more than the Creator 1 Is it righteous to harden thy heart against his fear and love "? to live under his power, and never reve- rence it 1 his goodness, and never acknowledge it 1 to af- front his authority, to belie his truth, abuse his mercy, im- pose upon his patience, defj' his justice ; to exalt thy own interest against his ; the trifling petite interest of a silly worm, against the great all-comprehending interest of the common Lord of all the world 1 to cross his will, to do thy own "? to please thyself, to the displeasing of him'? Whence hadst thou thy measures of justice, if this be just 1 Ciup. XIV. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 237 Again, is it righteous to deny the Lord that bought thee, to neglect that great salv^ation which he is the author ol"? And whereas he came to bless thee in turning thee from thine iniquities, wilfully to remain still in an accursed ser- vitude to sin? when he was made manifest to destroy the works of the devil, still to yield thyself a captive at his will ■? Whereas he died that thou mighlcst not any longer live to thyself, but to him that died for thee, and rose again; and that he might redeem thee from thy vain con- versation ; and that thou art so expressly told, that such as still lead sensual lives, mind earthly things, have not their conversation in heaven, are enemies to the cross of Christ. Is it no unrighteousness, that in these respects thy whole life should be nothing else but a constant contradiction to the very design of his dying? a perpetual hostility, a very tilting at his cross 7 Is there no unrighteousness in thy obstinate infidelity, that wickedly denies belief to his glo- rious truths, acceptance of his gracious offers, subjection to his holy lawsl No mirighteousness in thy obslinate, remorseless impenitency 1 thy heart that cannot repent 1 that melts not, while a crucified Jesus, amidst his agonies and dying pangs, cries to thee from the cross, O sinner, enough, thy hard heart breaks mine ! yield at last, and turn to God. Is it righteous, to live as no way under law to Christ "? to persist in actual rebellion against his just go- ^'•ernraent, which he died, and revived, and rose again, to establish over the livang and the deadl yea, and that while thou.pretendest thy.self a Christian 1 In a word : Is it righteous to tread imder foot the Son of God, to vilify his blood, and despise his Spirit 1 Is this the righteous- ness that thou talkest of? Are the.se thy qualifications for the everlasting blessedness 1 If thou say, thou confessest thou art in thyself, in these several respects, altogether unrighteous, but thou hopest the righteousness of Christ will be sufficient to answer for all ; no doubt Christ's righteousness is abundantly available to all the ends for which it was intended by the Father and him; but it shall never answer all the ends that a foolish, wicked heart will fondly imagine to itself. In short, it serves to excuse thy non-performance of, and stands instead of thy perfect sinless obedience to, the law of works; but itserv^es not instead of thy performance of what is required of thee, as the condition of the gospel- covenant. That is, it shall never supply the room of faith, repentance, regeneration, holiness, the loving of Christ above all, and God in him; so a.s to render these unneces- sary, or salvation possible without them. There is not one tola or little in the Bible, that so much as intimates an unregenerate person, an unbeliever, an impenitent or unholy person, shall be saved by Christ's righteousness ; but enough to the contrary, everyone knows, that hath the least acquaintance with the Scriptures. Vain man! what, is Christ divided, and divided against himself; Christ without against Christ within "? his sufferings on the cross and foregoing obedience, against his Spirit and govern- ment in the soul "? Did Christ die to take away the neces- sity of our being Christians'? And must his death serve not to destroy sin out of the world, but Christianity 1 Who hath taught thee so wickedly to misunderstand the design of Christ's dying 1 And when the Scripture so plainly tells thee, d that God so loved the w^orld, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life ; and •■ that he became the author of eternal salvation to them that obey him ; yea, and that he will come in flaming fire to take vengeance on them that know and obey him not ; what should induce thee to think thou mayest be saved by him, whether thou believest and obeyest or not ■? No, if ever thou think to see God, and be happy in him, thou must have a righteousness in thee resembling his; the very product, the thing wrought in the work of regeneration, f If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that doeth righteousness is born of him. Whereupon follows the description of the blessedness d John iii. 16. K John V. 37. e Heb. v. 9. h Prov. X. 16. fl Johnii. 29. i Ch. xi. 14, 18. of such righteous ones, in the beginning of the next chapter, They are sons they shall be like, &.c. So that in a word, without some sight oi God here, there is no seeing him hereafter; without some likeness to him how, none hereafter. And such as are destitute of that heart-conformity to the gospel, wherein ihe evangelical righteousness stands, are so far from it, that we may say to them as our Saviour to the Jews,? Ye have neither heard his voice, nor seen his shape, i. e. you have never had right notion, or any the least true glimpse of him; your hearts are wholly destitute of all divine impressions whatsoever. 8. Infer. We may further infer, from this qualification of the subject of blessedness, that righteousness is novain thing. That is not in vain, that ends so well, and ha'th so happy an issue at last. Scripture tells us,h that the labour of the righteous tendeth to life : and that we may under- stand it of their labour as they are righteous, we are more plainly told, that i righteousness tendeth to life ; t and that to thein that sow righteousness shall be a sure reward. That the righteous shall shine as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. The righteous into eternal life, i And we here see that righteousness ends in the bles.sed sight of God's glorious face, in being satisfied with the Divine likeness. Fool-ish sinners are justly upbraided that they spend their ■" labour for that which satisfies not ; take much pains to no purpose. Such are all the works of sin, toilsome, fruitless :■> What fruit had ye of those things {viz. which ye wrought when you were free from righteousness) whereof ye are now ashamed ; for the end of those things IS death. " But (it follows) being now made free from sin, and become servants to God, (which is paraphrased above by servants to righteousness,) ye have your fruit unto ho- liness, and the end everlasting life. The fruit is a con- tinual increase of holiness, a growing more and more like God ; till at last everlasting life, satisfaction with his like- ness, do crown and consummate all. You have now what to answer to the atheist's profane query. What profit is it to serve Godi to what purpose to lead so strict and precise a life 1 You may now see to what purpose it is ; and whereunto godliness (which right- eousness here includes) is profitable, a* having, besides what it entitles to here, the promise of that life which is to come. There needs no more to discover any thing not to be vain (inasmuch as nothing can be said to be so, but in reference to an end, as being good for nothing) than the eviction of these two things :— that it aims at a truly worthy and valuable end; and — that its tendency thereto is direct and certain. In the present case, both these are obvious enough at the first view. For as to the former of them: all the world will agree, without disputing the mat- ter, that the last end of man (i. e. which he ultimately pro- pounds to himself) is his best good: and that he can de- sign no further good to himself than satisfaction ; nothing after or bevond that : and what can afford it, if the vision and participation of the Divine glory do not 1 As to the latter: besides all that assurance given by Scriplure-con- stitution to the righteous man, concerning his future re- ward, let the consciences be consulted of the most besotted sinners, in any lucid interval, and they will give their suftYage, (Balaam, that so earnestly followed the reward of unrighteousness, not excepted,) that the way of right- eousness is that only likely way to happiness ; and would therefore desire to die, at "least, the righteous man's death, and that their latter end should be like his. So is wisdom (I might call it righteousness too; the wicked man is the Scripture fool, and the righteous the wise man) justified not by her children only, but by her enemies also. And sure,' 'tis meet that she should be more openly justified by her children, and that they learn to silence and repress those misgiving thoughts;'" Surely I have washed my hands in vain, &c. ; and p be steadfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as they know their labour is not in vain in the Lord. k Matt. xiii. 13. n Rom. vi. 20, 21. I Chap. XXV. 4«. o Psal. 1x301. m Isa. Iv. 2. p 1 Cor. XV. 58. S38 THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XV. CHAPTER XV. Two other inferences, from the consideration of the season of this blessedness : The former, that inasmuch as this blessedness is not attained in this life, the present happiness of saints must in a great part consist in hope. The latter, that great is the wisdom and sagacity of the righteous man, which waives a present temporary happiness, and cliooses that which is distant and future. Inasmuch as the season of this blessedness is not on this side the grave, nor expected by saints till they awake ; we may further infer, 9. Infer. Ninthly, That their happiness in the meantime doth very much consist in hope ; or that hope must needs be of very great necessity and use to them in their present state for their comfort and support. It were not otherwise possible to subsist in the absence and want of their highest good, while nothing in this lower world is, as to kind and nature, suitable to their desires, or makes any colourable overture to them of satisfaction and happiness. Others (as the Psalmist observes) have their portion in this life ; that good, which as to the species and kind of it, is most grateful to them, is present, under view, within sight ; and (as the aposlle^) Hope that is seen is not hope, for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for it 1 But those whose more refined spirits, having received the first fruits of the Holy Spirit of God, prompt them to groan after something beyond time, and above this sublunary sphere ; of them the apostle there tells us, that they are saved by hope. They (as if he should say) subsist by it ; they were never able to hold out, were it not for their hope ; and that a hope too, beyond this life, as is the hope of a Christian ; b if in this life only we had hope in Christ, &c. The hope of a Christian, as such, is suitable to its productive cause, the resurrection of Christ from the dead ; begotten to '^ a lively hope by the resurrection, &c. Thence is it the hope of a renewed, never-dying life, the hope of a blessed im- mortality; whereof Christ's resurrection was a certain argument and pledge. Indeed the new creature is, ab orighie, and all along, a hoping creature, both in its privmvi and its porro esse : 'tis conceived, and formed, and nursed up in hope. In its production, and in its progress towards perfection, 'tis manifestly influenc d thereby. In the first return of the soul to God, hope, being then planted as a part of the holy, gracious nature, now manifestly discovers itself; when the soul begins to act, (as turning after the reception of the Divine influence is its act,) hope insinuates itself into (or induces rather) that ver}^ act. Returning is not the act of a despairing, but hoping soul. 'Tis God apprehended as reconcilable, that attracts and wins it; while he is looked upon as an implacable enemy, the soul naturally shuns him, and comes not nigh, till drawn d with those cords of a man, the bands of love. While it says. There is no hope, it says withal, (desperately eaough,) " I have loved stran- gers, and after them will I go. But if there be any hope in Israel, concerning this thing : if it can yet apprehend God willing to forgive, then f Let us make a covenant, &c. This presently draws the hovering soul into a closure and league with him. And thus is the union continued, s Un- Eteadfastness in the covenant of God, is resolved into this not setting or fixing of hope in him ; or (which amounts to the same) setting of hope in God is directed as a means to h steadfastness of spirit with him, and a keeping of his covenant. Revolting souls are encouraged to turn to the Lord upon this consideration, that salvation is i hoped for in vain from any other ; the case being indeed the same in all after-conversions as in the first. God as multipljungto pardon, and still retaining the same name,k The Lord, the Lord gracious and merciful, (which name in all the seve- rals that compose and make it up, is in his Christ,) invites back to him the backsliding sinner, and renews his thoughts of returning. And so is he afterwards under the teachings of grace, led on by hope, through the whole course of re- ligion towards the future glory. Grace appears, teaching sinners to deny ungodliness, &c. and in the i looking for the blessed hope, the glorious appearing of the great God, a Rom. viii. 24. b 1 Cor. XV. 19. c 1 Pet. i. 3. n 1 John iii. 3. d Hos. xi. e Jer. ii. f Ezra X. 2, 3. (] 1 Thess. V. 8. r Psal. Ixxnii. 7, 13. K Exod. xxxiv. 6. h Vcr. 10. i Jer. iii. 22, 23. s Hab. u. 4. ITit. ii. 1), 12, 13. m Rom. ii. 7. u 2 Cor. iv. 16, 18 &c. So do they keep themselves in the love of God, look- ing for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. Thus is the new creature formed in hope, and nour- ished in hope ; and if its eye were upon pardon at first, 'tis more upon the promised glory afterwards. And yet that last end hath in a degree its attractive influence upon it, from the first formation of it ; 'tis even then taught to de- sign for glory. 'Tis begotten to the lively hope, (where though hope be taken objectively, as the apposition shows of the following words, to an inheritance, yet the act is evidently connoted ; for the thing hoped for, is meant under that notion, as hoped for,) and its whole following course is an aiming at glory; a'" seeking glory, honour, immor- tality, &c. Thus is the workof sanctification carried on ;" He that hath this hope purifieth himself Thus are losses sustained ; ° The spoiling of goods taken joyfully through the expectation of the better and enduring substance. The most hazardous services undertaken, even an apostleship to a despised Chri.st, — p In the hope of eternal life, which God that cannot lie hath promised. All difficulties en- countered and overcome, while thei helmet is the hope of salvation. All worldly evils are willingly endured ; and all suc/i good things quitted and forsaken, for Christ's sake and his elect's. And if the question be asked, (as it was once of Alexander, when so frankly distributing his treasures among his followers,) What do vou reserve for yourself 1 The resolved Christian makes (with him) that short and brave reply, HOPE. He lives upon things future and un- seen. The objects any one converses with most, and in which his life is as it were bound up, are suitable to the ruling principles of life in him. ' They that are after the flesh, do .savour the things of the flesh ; they that are after the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. The principle of the fleshly life is sense : the principle of the spiritual life is faith. Sense is a mean, low, narrow, incomprehensive principle, limited to a point, this centre of earth, and to vw, this note of time ; it can reach no higher than terrene things, nor further than present things ; so brutish is the life of him that is ltd by it ; wholly confined to matter and time. But the righteous live by faith. Their faith governs and maintains their life. They steer not their course according to what they see, but according to what they believe : and their daily sustenance is by the same kind of things. Their faith influences not their actions only, but their comforts and enjoyments. They subsist by the things they believe, even invisible and eternal things ; but it is by the intervening exercise of hope, whose object is the same. The apostle having told us from the prophet, that the ^ just shall live by faith, presently sub- joins a description of that faith they live by, I'iz. that it is ' the substance of things hoped for, and the evidence of things not seen; it substantiates and realizes, evidences and demonstrates those glorious objects, so far above the reach and sphere of sense. It is constantly sent out to forage in the invisible regions for the maintenance of this life; and thence fetches in the provisions upon which hope feeds, to the strengthening of the heart, the renewing of life and spirits. Our inward man, (saiththe apostle)" is renewed day by day ; while we look, or take aim (which is next in the series of the discourse, for the intervening vei'se is ma- nifestly parenthetical) not at the things that are seen, but at the things that are not seen; for the things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are not seen are eternal. And the word here rendered^ ^ooA: doth plainly signify the act of hope as well as that of faith ; for it doth not import a mere intuition or beholding, a taking notice or assenting only that there are such things, but a designing or scoping at them (which is the very word) with an appropriative eye ; as things that, notwithstanding their distance, or what- soever imaginable difficulty, are hoped to be attained to and enjoyed. And here are evidently the distinct parts of fait li and hoj)e in this business ; faith, upon the authority and credit of the Divine word and promise, persuades the heart that there is such a glorious state of things reserved for the saints in general, (faith can go no further, for the word of promise goes no further,) and so serves instead of eyes in the Divine light, to view those glories; or it presents them o Heb. X. 34. p Tit. i. 1, a. r Rom. vlii. 5. t Heb. xi. 1. X CKOTTOVVTbll/. j Chap. XV. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 239 (as so many substantial realities,) demonstrates tliem, sub- mits them to view, whence hope reaches Ibrih to them ; contends against and triumphs over all attending difficul- ties, and pcvssesses them; gives the soul an early antici- pated fruition of them, for its present support and relief. So that it y rejoices m the hope of the glory of God. It might well therefore be said, I had fainted, if I had not believed, or who can express how sad my case had been, if I had not believed 1 for there is an elegant aposiopesis in the Hebrew text, the words " I had fainted" being sup- plied in the translation. If I had not believed, what had be- come of me then '\ q. d. Inasmuch as faith feeds, as it were, those hopes wliich more immediately, the Lord makes use of, for the strengthening his people's hearts, as it was intimated in the following words, compared with Psal. xxxi. 24. In the present case; faith a.scertains the heart of the truth of the promises, so that thus the soul states the case to itself. Though I have not walked to and fro in those upper regions, nor taken a view of the heavenly inheri- tance; though I have not been in the third heavens, and seen the ineffable glory; yet the gospel revelation, which hath brought life and immortality to light, the word of the eternal God, who hath told me this is the state of things in the other world, cannot but be true : my faith may therefore be to me instead of eyes : and the Divine testimony must supply the place of light : both together, give, methinks, a fair prospect of those far distant, glorious objects which I have now in view. Now this awakens hope, and makes it revive, and run to embrace what faith hath discovered in the promise : ^ In the hope of eternal life, which God that cannot lie hath promised. 'Tis " the word of God that causes the soul to hope, (i. e. believed, for disbelieved, it signifies nothing with it,) and that not only as it contains a narration, but a promi.se concerning a future state. I may without much emotion of heart, hear from a travel- ler the description of a pleasant country, where I have not been; but if the lord of that country give me, besides the account of it, an assurance of enjoying rich and ample possessions there, this presently begets a hope, the plea- sure whereof would much relieve a present distressed es- tate ; and which nothing but that of actual possession, can exceed. That 'tis not more so with us here, admits of no excuse. Is God less to be believed than a manl Will we deny him the privilege of being able to discover his mind, and the truth of things credible, which we ordina- rily allow to any one that is not a convicted liar 1 Christ expects his disciples should very confidently assure them- selves of the preparations made for them in another world, upon that very ground alone, that he had not told them the contrary : b Let not your hearts be troubled, ye believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father's house are many mansions, if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare, &c. intimating to them, they ought to have that opinion of his plainness and sincerity, as never to imagine he would have proselyted them to a religion that should undo them in this world, if there were not a suffi- cient recompense awaiting them in the other, but he would certainly have let them knov\Ti the worst of their case : much more might he expect, they should be confident upon his so often and expressly telling them, that so it is. If his silence might be a ground of hope, much more his word. And surely so grounded a hope cannot but be con- solatory and relieving in this sad interval, till the awa- jjing hour. 10. Infer. Lastly, Since this blessedness of the riglite- ous is, as to the season of it. future, not expected till they awake, we may infer, that 'tis great wisdom and sagacity that guides the righteous man's choice ; while he waves a present and temporary, and chooses this future and ex- pected, blessedness. 'Tis true, that philosophy hath been wont to teach us, that choice or election hath no place about the end, because that is but one, and choice always implies a competition. But that very reason evinces, that in our present stale and case, choice must have place about the end. That philosophy might have suited better the state of innocent Adam ; when there was nothing to blind and bribe a man's judgment, or occasion it to deliberate about the supreme end, (then it might be truly said, deli- beration itself was a defection,) nor to pervert and misin- cline his will ; and so its action, in proposing its end, would be simple intention, not choice. But so hath the apostacy and sin of man blinded and befooled him, that he is at a loss about nothing more than what is the chief good. And though St. Augustine "= reduce Varro's two hundred and eighteen differing .sects about it to twelve, that's enough to prove (but daily experience doth it more convincing- ly, and sadly) a real, though most unjust competition. Therefore a sinner can never be blessed without cnoosing his blessedness ; and therein it highly concerns him to choose aright, and that a spirit of wisdcjrn and counsel guide his choice. While man had not as yet fallen, to de- liberate whether he should adhere to God or no, was a gradual declension, the very inchoation of his fall ; but having fallen, necessity makes that a virtue which was a wickedness before. There is no returning to God without considering our ways. The so much altered state of the case, quite alters the nature of the things. It was a consulting to do evil before ; now to do good. And hence also, d choosing the Lord to be our God, be- comes a necessary duty. Which is to make choice of this very blessedness, that consists in the knowledge, likeness, and enjoyment of him. And now, inasmuch a.s this bless- edness is not fully attained by the longing soul, till time expire and its eternity commence ; here is a great disco- very of that wisdom which guides this happy choice. This is great wisdom in prospect ion; in taking care of the future; and at how much the further distance one can provide, so much the greater reputation of wisdom is justly acquired to him ; yea, we seem to place the sum of practical wisdom in this one thing, while we agree to call it providence, un- der the contracted name of prudence. The wise man makes it at least an evidence or part of wisdom, when he tells us ' the prudent foreseeth, &c. The righteous man so far ex- cels in this faculty, as that his eye looks through all the periods of time, and penetrates into eternity, recommends to the soul a blessedness of that same stamp and alloy, that will endure and last forever. It will not content him to be happy for an hour, or for any space tliat can have an end; after which it shall be possible to him to look back and recount with himself how happy he was once: nor is he so much solicitous what his present state be, if he can but find he is upon safe terms as to his future and eternal slate. As for me, saith the Psalmist, (he herein sorts and severs himselt from them whose portion was in this life.) ( I shall behold — I shall be satisfied, when I awake ; he cauld vot say it u-as veil with him, bid shall be, q. d. Let the purblind, short-sighted sensualist embrace this present world, who can see no further: let me have my portion in the world to come ; may my soul always lie open to the imprecision of the powers of the coming world ; and in this, .':o use every thing as to be under the power of nothing. What are the pleasures of sin, that are but for a season ; or what the sufferings of this nmo, this moment of affliction, to the glory that shall be revealed, to the exceeding and eter- nal glory 1 He considers, patient afflicted godliness will triumph at last, when riotous raging wickedness shall la- ment for ever. He may for a time weep and mourn, while the world rejoices; he may be sorrowful, but his sorrow shall be turned into joy, and his joy none shall take from him. Surely? here is wisdom; this is the wisdom that is from above, and tends thither. This is to be wise unto salvation. The righteous man is a judicious man ; he hafh in a measure that judgment (wherein the apostle prays the Philippians might ii abound) to approve things that are excellent, and accordingly to make his choice. This is a sense (little thought of by the author) wherein that sober speech of the voluptuous philosopher is most certainly true, > A man cannot live happily, without living •wisely. No man shall ever enjoy the eternal plea.sures hereafter, that in this acquits not himself wisely here, even in this choosing the better part, that shall never be taken from him. In this the plain righteous man outvies the greatest sophies, the scribe, the disputer, the politician, thr, prudent mammonisi, the facete wit; who, in their several y Rom. V. 2. xii. fa John xiv. 1,2. d Josh. xxiv. 15. P.9al. x.\vii. 13. 14. 7. Tit. i. 2. a Psal. xi.\. 49. c DeCivit. Dei, lib. 19. e Prov. xxii. 3. f E.St bene non potuit dir«re dicit erit. g John xn. 20, 22. h Phil. i. 9, 10. i EviiruruB. 240 THE BLESSEDNESS OP THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XVI. kinds, all think themselves highly to have merited to be accounted wise : and that this point of wisdom should es- cape their notice, and be the principal thing with him, can be resolved into nothing else but the Divine good pleasure! In this contemplation our Lord Jesus Christ is said to have rejoiced in spirit, (it even put his great comprehensive soul into an ecstacy,) k Father 1 thank thee, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and revealed them to babes; even so Father, because it pleased thee ! Here was a thing fit to be reflect- ed on, as a piece of Divine royally ; a part worthy of the Lord of heaven and earth. And what serious spirit would it not amaze, to weigh and ponder this case awhile ; to see men excelling in all other kinds of knowledge, so far excelled by those they most contemn, in the highest point of wisdom ; such as know how to search into the most ab- struse mysteries of nature ; that can unravel, or see through the most perplexed intrigues of state ; that know how to save their own stake, and secure their private interest in what- soever times ; yet so little seen, (often, for not many wise) in the matters that concern an eternal felicity ! It puts me in mind of what I find observed by some, the particular madness, (a dementia quo ad hoc,) as 'tis called ; when per- sons, in every thing else, capable of sober, rational dis- course, when you bring them to some one thing, (that in reference to which they became distempered at first) they rave and are perfectly mad. How many that can manage a discourse with great reason and judgment about other matters, who, when you come to discourse with them about the affairs of practical godliness, and which most directly tend to that future state of blessedness, they are as at their wit's end, know not what to say; they savour not those things ! These are things not understood, but by such to whom it is given ; and surely that given Avisdom is the most excellent wisdom. Sometimes God doth, as it were, so far gratify the world, as to speak their own lan- guage, and call them wise that affect to be called so, and that wisdom which they would fain have go under that name ; Moses, it is said, was skilled in all the i wisdom of Egypt, &c. But at other times he expressly calls those wise men fools, and their wisdom, folly and madness ; or annexes some disgraceful abject for distinction sake ; or applies those appellatives ironically, and in manifest deri- sion. No doubt, but any such person as was represented in the parable, would have thought himself to have done the part of a very wise man, in entertaining such delibe- ration and resolves, as we find he had there with himself. How strange was that to his ears, >" Thou fool, this night shall they require thy soul, &c. Their wisdom is some- times said to be foolish ; or else called the wisdom of the flesh, or fleshly wisdom; said to be earthly, sensual, devil- ish ; they are said to be wise to do evil ; while to do good they have no understanding ; they are brought sometimes as it were upon the stage with their wisdom, to be the matter of Divine triumph ; where is the wise 7 and that which they account foolishness is made to confound their wisdom. And indeed do they deserve to be thought wise, that are so busily intent upon momentary trifles, and trifle with eternal concernments 1 that prefer vanishing shadows to the everlasting glory "? that follow lying vanities, and forsake their own mercies 1 Yea, will they not cease to be wise in their own eyes also, when they see the issue, and reap the fruits of their foolish choice 1 when they find the happiness they preferred before this eternal one is quite over ; and nothing remains to them of it, but an afflictive remembrance 1 that the torment they were told would fol- low, is but now beginning, and without end 1 when they hear from the mouth of their impartial Judge, Remember, you in your life-time had your good things, and my faith- ful servants their evil; now they must be comforted, and you tormented 1 when they are told, " you have received the consolation ; you were full, ye did laugh, now you must pine, and mourn, and weep'? Will they not then be as ready to befool themselves, and say as they, " See, those (righteous ones) are they whom we sometimes had in de- rision, and for a proverb of reproach: we fools counted their life madness, and that their end was without honour; but now, how are they numbered among the sons of God, k Luke X. 21. II Luke xi. at, i». 1 Aotg vii. 22. o Wisd. V. 3. &c. ra Luke .\ii. 20. p 1 Cor. i. 21. and their lot is among the saints ? They that were too wise before, to mind so mean a thing as religion (p the world through wisdom knew not God ; strange wisdom !) that could so wisely baffle conscience, and put fallacies upon their own souls ; that had so ingenious shifts to elude ■> conviction, and divert any serious thought from fastening' upon their spirits ; that were wont so slyly to jeer holi- ness, seemed as they meant to laugh religion out of coun- tenance ; ithey will now know, that a circumspect walk- ing, a faithful redeeming of time, and improving it in or- der to eternity, was to do, not as fools, but as wise; and be- gin to think of themselves, now at last, as all wise and so- ber men thought of them before. CHAPTER XVI. The second general head of the improvement or use of the doctrine propound- ed from the text, containing certam rules or prescriptions of duty connatural thereto. 1. That we settle in our minds the true notion of this blessedness. 2. That we compare the temper of our own spirits with it, and labour thence to discern whether we may lay claim to it or no. Thus far we have the account of the truths to be con- sidered and weighed that have dependence on the doctrine of the text. Next follow the duties to be practised and done in refer- ence thereto, which I shall lay down in the ensuing rules or prescriptions. 1. That we admit and settle the distinct notion of this blessedness in our own minds and judgments ; that we fix in our own souls apprehensions agreeable t-o the account this scripture hath given us of it. This is a counsel lead- ing and introductive to the rest; and which if it obtain with us, will have a general influence upon the whole course of that practice which the doctrine already opened calls for. As our apprehensions of this blessedness are more distinct and clear, it may be expected more powe>r- fully to command our hearts and lives. Hence it is, in great part, the spirits and conversations of Christians have so little savour and appearance of heaven in them. We rest in some general and confused notion of it, in which there is little either of efficacy or pleasure ; we descend not into a particular inquiry and consideration what it is. Our thoughts of it are gloomy and obscure ; and hence it is our spirit is naturally listless and indifferent towards it, and rather contents itself to sit still in a region all light- some round about, and among objects it hath somepresent acquaintance with, than venture itself forth as into a new world which it knows but little of. And hence our lives are low and carnal ; they look not as though we were seeking the heavenly country ; and indeed who can be in good earnest in seeking after an unknown state ? This is owing to our negligence and infidelity. The blessed God hath not been shy and reserved ; hath not hidden or concealed from us the glory of the other world ; nor locked up heaven to us ; nor left us to the uncertain guesses of our own imagination, the wild fictions of an unguided fancy ; which would have created us a poetical heaven only, and have mocked us with false elysiums : but though much be yet within the vail, he hath been liberal in his discoveries to us. Life and immortalit)' are brought to light in the gospel. The future blessedness (though some refined heathens have had near guesses at it) is certainly apprehensible by the measure only of God's revelation of it ; for who can determine, with certainty, of the eflfects of Divine good pleasure ('tis your Father's good pleasure to give you a kingdom ?) Who can tell beforehand what so free and boundless goodness will do, further than as he himself discovers it ? The discovery is as free as the donation. The things "that eye hath not seen, and ear not heard, and which have not entered into the heart of man, God hath revealed to us by his Spirit ; and it follows, ver. 12. We have received the spirit of God, that we might know the things freely given us of God. The Spirit is both the principle of the external revelation, as having inspired the Scriptures which foreshow this glory, and of the inter- nal revelation also, to enlighten blind minds that would otherwise (/luuml^sn') never be able to discover things at so n Folly is joy to him that is destitute of wisdom. Prov. xv. a 1 Cor. ii. 9. Chap. XVI. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 341 great a distance, see afar off; therefore called the spirit of wisdom and revelation, by which bihe eyes of the under- standing are enlightened to know tiie hope of that calling, and the riches of the glory of his inheritance among the saints, as the ck there is most fitly to be rendered. But this internal discovery is made by the mediation and interveniency of the external ; therefore having that before our eyes, we are to apply our minds to the study and consideration of it ; and in that way to expect the free illumination of the Holy Spirit. In the meantime we must charge our ignorance, and the darkness of our cloudy thoughts, touching these things, upon our carelessness, lhat\vc do not attend; or our incredulity, that we will not believe what God hath revealed concerning them : 'tis therefore a dutiful atlenlion, and reverential faith, that must settle and fix the notion of this blessedness. If we will not regard nor give credit to what God hath discovered concerning it, we may sit still in a torpid, disconsolate darkness, which we ourselves are the authors of, or (which is no less pernicious) compass ourselves with sparks beaten out of our own forge, walk in the light of our own fire, cheat our souls with the fond dream of an imagined lieaven, no where to be found, till we at length lie down in soriow. How perverse are the imaginations of men in this (as in reference to the way, so) in respect of the end also; for as they take upon them to fancy another way to happiness quite besides and against the plain word of God ; so do they imagine to themselves another kind of happiness, such as shall gratify only their sensual desires ; a Alahometan, indeed a fool's, paradise; or at best 'tis but a negative heaven ; they many times entertain in their thoughts (of which their sense too is the only measure) a state wherein nothing shall offend or incommode the flesh ; in which they shall nor hunger, not thirst, nor feel want : and when they have thus stated the matter in their own thoughts, we cannot beat them out of it, but that they desire to go to heaven; {viz. the heaven of their own making;) when, did they conceive it truly and fully, they would find their hearts to abhor from it, even as hell itself Therefore here we should exercise an authority over ourselves, and awaken conscience to its proper work and business ; and demand of it. Is it not reasonable these divine discoveries should take place with rael hath not God spoken plainly enough 1 why should my heart any longer hang in doubt with me, or look wishly towards future glory, as if it were an uncouth thing 1 or is it reasonable to confront my own imaginations to his discoveries 1 Charge conscience with the duty it owes to God in such a case ; and let his reve- lations be received with the reverence and resignation which they challenge ; and in them study and contemplate the blessedness of awakened souls ; till you have agreed with yourself fully how to conceive it. Run over every part of it in your thoughts ; view the several divine excellencies which you are hereafter to see and imitate ; and think v/hat every thing will contribute to the satisfaction and contentment of your spirits. This is a matter of unspeak- able consequence. Therefore, to be as clear as is possible, you may digest what is recommended to you in these more particular directions. 1. Resolve with yourselves, to make the divine reve- lation of this blessedness the prime measure and reason of all your apprehensions concerning it. Fix that purpose in your own hearts, so to order all your conceptions about It, that when you demand of yourselves, what do I con- ceive of the future blessedness 1 and why do I conceive sol the divine revelation may answer both the questions. I apprehend what God hath revealed, and because he hath so revealed. The Lord of heaven sure best understands it, and can best help us to the understanding of it. If it be said of the "^origin of this world, 7rts-£< vooiitcv, it may much more be said of the state of the other, we under- stand it by faith : that must inform and perfect our intel- lectuals in this matter. 2. Therefore reject and sever from the notion of this blessedness, whatsoever is alien to the account Scripture gives us of it. Think not that sensual pleasure, that a b Eph. i. 17. c Heb. xi. 3. d Yvl^riv dtois 'Zvl^n ('t Oenis o avvcxbis Scikvvs cavTOi; rriv cavTov \lAi\r]v apcTKOfitvrjv fitvTZ roii airovtjiopicvoif : -noiovrrav 6e oaa Pox'Xctoi n iai/iMV, ovCKa^uiTrpos'aTm't&c.—.'vroifees'iveKas'ovvovsKat Xoyof. Marc. Ant. 1. 5. liberty of sinning, that an exemption from the divine dominion, distance and estrangedness from God (which by nature you wickedly aflect) can have anyingrediency into, or consistency with, this stale of blessedness. 3. Gather up into it whatsoever you can find by the Scripture-discovery to appertain or belong thereto. Let your notion of it be to your uttermost, not only true^ but comprehensive and full, and as particular and positive, as God's revelation will warrant : especially remember 'tis a spiritual blessedness, that consists in the refining and per- fecting of your spirits by the vision and likeness of the holy God, and the satisfying of them thereby for ever. 4. Get the notion of this blessedness deep imprinted in your minds; .so as to abide with you, that you may not be always at a loss, and change your apprehensions every time you come to think of it. Let a once well-formed idea, a clear, full state of it be preserved entire, and be (as a lively image) always before your eyes, which you may readily view upon all occasions. 2. J?K^^. That having well fixed the notion of this blessed- ness in your minds, you seriously reflect upon yourself, and compare the temper of your spii it with it ; that you may find out how it is affected thereto; and thence judge in what likelihood you are of enjoying it. The general aver- sion of men's spirits to this so necessary work of self- refleclion, is one of the most deplorable s],Tnptoms of lapsed degenerated humanity. The wickedne.ss that hath overspread the nature of man, and a secret consciousness and misgiving, hath made men afraid of themselves, and studiously to decline all acquaintance with their own souls ; to shun themselves as ghosts and spectres; they cannot endure to appear to themselves. You can hardly impose a severer task upon a wicked man, than to go retire an hour or two, and commune with himself : he knows not how to face his own thoughts ; his own soul is a devil to him, as indeed it will be in hell, the most frightful, tor- menting devil. Yet, what power is there in man, more excellent, more appropriate to reasonable nature, than that of reflecting, of turning his thoughts upon himself! Sense must here confess itself outdone. The eye that sees other objects cannot see itself: but the mind, a rational sun, cannot only project its beams, but revert them ; make its thoughts turn inward. It can see its own face, contemplate itself And how useful an endowment is this to the nature of man ! If he err, he might perpetuate his error, and wander infinitely, if he had not this self-reflecting power; and if he do well, never know without it the comfort of a rational self-approbation : which comfort paganish morality hath valued so highly, as to account it did associate a man with the inhabitants of heaven, and make him lead his life as among the gods (as their pagan language is) ; though the name of the reflecting power, conscience, they were less ac- quainted with; the thing itself they reckoned as a kind of indwelling deity, as may be seen at large in those discourses of Maximus Tyrius, and Apuleius, both upon the same subject, concerning the god of Socrates. And another giving this precept, a Familiarize thyself with the gods, adds, (ind this shall thou where your treasure is, there will your hearts be also. If thy treasure, thy great interest, thy pre- cious and most valuable good be above, that will attract thy heart, it will certainly be disposed thitherward. "Yet here it must carefully be considered, that inasmuch as this blessedness is thy end, i. e. thy supreme good, (as the notion of treasure also imports,) thy heart must be set upon it above any other enjoyment ; else all is to no pur- pose. 'Tis not a faint, slight, over-mastered inclination that k Rom. ii. 6, 7. 1 Phil. iii. 18, 19, 20. m Col. ill. 1,2, 3, 4. will serve the turn, but (as all the fore-mentioned Scrip- tures import) such as will bespeak it a man's business to seek heaven, his main work ; and give ground to say of him, his heart is there. If two lovers solicit the same per- son, and speaking of them in comparisons she say, this hath my heart; is it tolerable to understand her, as mean- ing him she loves less 1 So absurd would it be to under- stand Scriptures, that speak of such an intention of heart heaven-ward, as if the faintest desire, or coldest wish, or most lazy inconstant endeavour, were all they meant. No, 'tis a steady, prevalent, victorious direction of heart towards the future glory, in comparison whereof, thou despisest all things else, (all temporal terrene things, that must be the evidential ground of thy hope to enjoy it. And therefore in this, deal faithfully with thy own soul, and demand of it. Dost thou esteem this blessedness above all things else 1 Do the thoughts of it continually return upon thee, and thy mind and heart, as it were, naturally run out to it 1 Are thy chiefest solicitudes and cares taken about it, lest thou shouldst fall short and suffer a disappointment "? Dost thou savour it with pleasure 1 hath it a sweet and grateful relish to thy soul ■? Dost thou bend all thy powers to pursue and press on towards it 1 Urge thyself to give answer truly to such inquiries ; and to consider them seriously, that thou mayst do so. Such whose spirits are either most highly raised and lifted up to heaven, or most deeply de- pressed and sunk into the earth, may make the clearest judgment of themselves. With them that are of a middle temper, the trial will be more difficult, j'et not fruitless, if it be managed with serious diligence, though no certain con- clusion or judgment be made thereupon. For the true de- sign and use of all such inquiries and reflections upon our- selves (which, let it be duly considered) is, not to bring us into a state of cessation from further endeavours ; as if we had nothing more to do (suppose we judge the best of our state that can be thought) but to keep us in a wakeful tem- per of spirit ; that we may not forget ourselves in the great business we have yet before us, but go on M'ith renewed vigour through the whole course of renewed endeavours, wherein we are to be still conversant, till we have attained our utmost mark and end. Therefore is this present in- quiry directed, as introductive to the further duty, that in the following rules is yet to be recommended. CHAPTER XVII. Rule 3 Directing such as upon inquiry find, or see cause to suspect, a tolal aversalion in themsolves to ttiis blesseitness, to be speedy and restless in their endeavours to have the temperof their spirits altered and made suitable to it. Doubts and objections concemine the use of such endeavours, in such a case, answered. Some considerations to enforce this direction propounded and pressed. 3. Rule. That if upon such reflection we find or suspect ourselves wholly disaffected and unsuitable to this blessed- ness, we apply ourselves to speedy, incessant endeavours to get the temper of our spirits changed and fitted thereto. The state of the case speaks itself, that there is no sitting still here. This is no condition, soul, to be rested in ; unless thou art provided to encounter the terrors of eternal darkness, and endure the torture of everlasting burnings. Yet am I not unapprehensive how great a difficulty a carnal heart will make of it to bestir itself in order to any redress of so de- plorable a case. And how real a difiiculty it is, to say arty thing that will be thought regardable to such a one. Our sad experience tells us, that our most efficacious words are commonly wont to be entertained as neglected pufts of wind ; our most convictive reasonings and persuasive ex- hortations lost (yea, and though they are managed too in the name of the great God) as upon the deaf and dead: which is too ofte.i apt to tempt into that resolution, of " speaking no more in that name." And were it not that the dread of that great Majesty restrains us, how hard were it to forbear such expostulations ; " Lord, why are we commonly sent upon so vain an errand 1 why are we re- quired to speak to them that will not hear, and expose thy sacred truths and counsels to the contempt of sinful worms ; to labour day by day in vain, and spend our strength for nought 1" — Yea, we cannot forbear to complain, "None so n Heb. xi. 1, 13, 16. o Matt. \\. 19, 20, 21. Chap. XVII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 245 labour in vain as we : of all men none so generally un- prosperous and unsuccessful. Others are wont to see the fruit of their labours, in proportion to the expense of strength in them : but our strength is labour and sorrow (for the most part) without the return of a joylul fruit. The husbandman ploughs in hope, and sows in hope, and is commonly partaker of his hope : we are sent to plough and sow among rocks and thorns, and in the high-Avay; how seldom fall we upon good ground ! Where have we any increase 1 Yea, Lord, how often are men the harder for all our labours with them, the deader for all endeavours to quicken them 1 Our breath kills them whom thou send- est us to speak life to; and we often become to them a deadly savour. Sometime, when we think somewliat is done to purpose, our labour all returns, and we are to begin again ; and when the duties we persuade to, come directly to cross men's interests and carnal inclinations, the)' revolt and start back, as if we were urging them upon flames, or the sword's point ; and their own souls and the eternal glory are regarded as a thing of nought : then heaven and hell become with them fancies and dreams ; and all that we have said to them false and fabulous. We are to the most as men that mock, in our most serious warnings and cotmsels ; and the word of the Lord is a reproach. We sometimes fill our mouths with arguments, and our hearts with hope, and think, sure they will now yield ; but they esteem our strongest reasonings (as Leviathan doth iron and brass) but as straw and rotten wood ; and laugh at Di- vine threatenings as he doth at the shaking of the spear. Yea, and when we have convinced them, yet we have done nothing ; though we have got their judgments and con- sciences on our side and their own, their lusts only reluc- tate and carry all. They will now have their way though they perish. We see them perishing under our very eye, and we cry to them (in thy name, O Lord) to return and live, but they regard us not. For these things, sometimes we weep in secret, and our eyes trickle down with tears ; yea, we cry to thee, O Lord, and thou hearest us not ; thy hand seems shortened, that it cannot save ; it puts not on strength as in the days of old : it hath snatched souls by thousands, as firebrands out of the fire ; but now thou hidest and drawest it back. Who hath believed our report 1 To whom is the arm of the Lord revealed 1 Meanwhile even the devil's instruments prosper more than we ; and he that makes it hisbusiness to tempt and entice down souls to hell, succeeds more than we that would allure them to heaven." But we must speak, whether men will hear or forbear ; though it concerns us to do it with fear and trembling. Oh, how solemn a business is it to treat with souls ! and how much to be dreaded, lest they miscarry through our imprudence or neglect ! I write with solicitude what shall become of these lines ; with what effect they will be read (if they fall into such hands) by them whom they most concern : yea, and with some doubt, whether it were best to write on or forbear. Sometimes one would incline to think it a merciful omission, lest Ave add to the account and torment of many at last ; but sense of duty towards all, and hope of doing good to some, must oversway. Consi- dering therefore the state of such souls I am now dealing with, I apprehend there may be obstructions to the enter- tainment of the counsel here recommended, of two sorts; partly in their minds, partly in their hearts ; something of appearing reason, but more of real perverse will. That which I shall do in pursuance of it, will fall under two answ^erable heads; 1. A reply to certain doubts and ob- jections, wherein to meet with the former : and — 2. The proposal of some considerations, wherein to contend against the latter. As to the first : It appears, men are grown ingeniously wicked, and have learned how to dispute themselves into hell ; and to neglect what concerns their eternal blessed- ness with some colour and pretence of reason. It will therefore be worth the while to discuss a little their more specious preteno^e, and consider their more obvious (sup- posable) scruples, which will be found to concern, either the po.ssibility, lawfulness, advantage, or necessity of the endeavours we persuade to. Doubt 1. Is it a possible undertaking you put us upon ; or, is there any thing we can do in order to the change of our own hearts'? We find ourselves altogether undesirous 20 of those things wherein you state blessedness, and they are without savour to us. If therefore the notion you give us of blessedness be right, all the work necessary to qualify us for it is yet to be done ; we yet remain wholly destitute of any principle of life, that may dispose us to such re- lishes and enjoyments. If the new creature (as you say) consist in a suitable temper of spirit unto such a state as this, 'lis as yet wholly unformed in us : and is there any thing to be done by a dead man in order to lifel Can a child contribute any thing to its first formation"? or a creature to its coming into being 1 Reply. If you were serious in what you say, methinks you should have little mind to play the sophisters, and put fallacies upon yourselves, in a matter that concerns the life of your soul. And what else are you now doing! For sure, otherwise one would think it were no such diffi- culty to understand the difference between the esse simpli- citer, the viere being of any thing, and the esse tale, its Icing such or such ; by the addition of somewhat afterward to that being. Though nothing could contribute to its own being simply; yet sure when it is in being, it may contri- bute to the bettering or perfecting of itself, (even as the unreasonable creatures themselves do :) and if it be a crea- ture naturally capable of acting v.ith design, it may act designedl}' in order to its becoming so or so qualified, or the attaining of somewhat yet wanting to its perfection. You cannot be thought so ignorant, but that 3'ou know the new creature is only an additional to your former being ; and though it be true, that it can do no more to its own pro- duction than the unconceived child, (as nothing can act before it is,) doth it therefore follow, that 3'our reasonable soul, in which it is to be formed, cannot use God's pre- scribed means in order to that blessed change 1 You can- not act holily as a saint ; but therefore can you not act ra- tionally as a manl I appeal to your reason and conscience in some particulars. Is it impossible to you to attend upon the dispensation of that gospel, which is God's power unto salvation, the seal bj- which he impresses his image, the glass through which his glory shines to the changing souls into the same likeness 1 Are you not as able to go to church as the tavern ; and to sit in the assembly of saints as of mockers'? Is it impossible to you, to consult the written word of God, and thence learn what you must be, and do, in order to blessedness "? Will not )'our eyes serve you to read the Bible as well as a gazette or play-book 1 Is it impossible to inquire of j'our minister, or an understand- ing Christian neighbour, concerning the way and terms of blessedness "? Cannot your tongue pronounce these words, What shall I do to be saved, as well as those, Pray what do you think of the weather "? or. What news is there go- ing 1 Yet further : Is it impossible to apply your thoughts to what you meet with suitable to your case, in your at- tendance upon preaching, reading, or discourse 1 Have all such words a barbarous sound in your ear "? Can you not consider what sense is carried under them ; what they import and signify 1 Can you not bethink yourself, Do the doctrines of God and Christ and the life to come, signif}' something or nothing '? or do they signifj' any thing worth the considering, or that 'tis fit for me to take notice of 1 And yet to proceed a little further with you : I pray you once more demand of yourselves, and put j'our consciences closely to it. whether, when they have told you (as no doubt the}' will) that such things deserve your considera- tion, it be impossible to you to use your considering power thus, and employ it even about these things'? Do but make this easy trial, and then say, whether it be impossi- ble. See if you cannot select one hour on purpose, where- in to sit down by yourselves alone, with this resolution ; Well, I will now spend this hour in considering my eter- nal concernments. When you have obtained so much of j'ourself ; set your thoughts on work, (you will find them voluble and unfixed, very apt to revolt and fly ofl^ from things you have no mind to, but) use vour authority with yourself, tell your soul (or let it tell" itself) these things concerning tliy life. At least, taking this prepared matter alons: with thee, (that thou mavst not have this pretence, thouknowcst not what to think of,) try if thou canst not think of these things, now actually suggested and offered to thy thoughts : as namely, Consider, that thou hast a rea- 246 THE BLESSEDNESS OP THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XVII. sonable, immortal soul, which as it is liable to eternal misery, so it is capable of eternal blessedness: that this blessedness thou dost understand to consist only in the vision of the blessed God, in being made like to him, and in the satisfaction that is thence to result and accrue to thee. Consider, (what thy very objection snpposeth,) that thou findest the temper of thy spirit to be altogether indis- posed and averse to such blessedness. Is it not sol is not this thy very easel feel now again thy heart ; try, is it not at least coldly affected towards this blessed state 1 Is it not then obvious to thee to consider, that the tem- per of thy Spirit must be changed, or thou art undone 1 that inasmuch as thy blessedness lies in God, this change must lie in the alteration of thy dispositions and the pos- ture of thy spirit towards himl Further, Canst thou not consider the power and fixedness of thy aversation from God, and with how mighty a weight thy heart is carried and held down from him 1 Try, lift at thy heart, see if it will be raised God- ward and lieaven-ward 1 Dost thou not find it is as if thou wert lifting at a mountain, that it lies as a dead Aveight and stirs not 1 Ponder thy case in this re- spect. And then, is it not to be considered, that thy time is passing away apace 1 that if thou let thyself alone, 'tis likely to be as bad with thee to-morrow as this day, and as bad next day as to-morrow 1 And if thy time expire and thou be snatched away in this state, what will become of thee 1 And dost thou not therefore see a necessity of con- sidering whatever may be most moving and most likely to incline thy heart God-ward, of pleading it more loudly and importunately with thyself 1 And canst thou not consider and reason the matter thus 1 " O my soul, what is the rea- son that thou so drawest back and hangest off from thy God 1 that thou art so unwillmg to be blessed in him 1 that thou shouldst venture to rim thyself upon eternal perdition rather 1 What cause hath he ever given thee to disaffect him 1 What is the ground of thy so mighty prejudice? Hath he ever done thee hurt 1 Dost thou think he will not accept a returning soull That is to give the lie to his Gos- pel! and it becomes not a perishing wretch so to provoke him in whom is all its hope. Is the eternal glory an un- desirable thing 1 or the everlasting burnings tolerable 1 Canst thou find away of being forever blessed without God; or whether he will or no 1 or is there a sufficient pleasure in thy sinful distance from God, to outweigh heaven and hell 1 Darest thou venture upon a resolution of giving God and Christ their last refusal ; or say, thou wilt never hearken to, or have to do with them morel or darest thou venture to do what thou darest not resolve; and act the wickedness thou canst not think ofl scorn eternal majesty and love; spurn and trample a bleeding Saviour 1" Commune thus awhile with thyself ; but if^'et thou find thy heart relent nothing, thou canst yet further consider, that it lies not in thy power to turn thy own heart, (or else how comest thou thus to object 1) And hence, canst thou avoid considering this is a distressed case 1 that thou art in great straits ; liable to perish, (yea, sure to do so if thou continue in that ill tem- per of spirit,) and wholly vmable to help thj-self 1 Surely thou canst not but see this to be a most distressed case. I put it now to thy conscience, whether being thus led on, thou canst not go thus far 1 See whether upon trial thy conscience give thee leave to say, I am not able thus to do or think : and be not here so foolish, as to separate the first cause and the second, in judging thy ability. Thou mayst say, No, I cannot think a good thought without God ; true, so I know thou canst not move thy finger without God ; but my meaning in this appeal to thy conscience is, ■whether upon trial thou findest not an assistance sufficient to carry thee thus far 1 Possibly thou wilt say, Yea, but what am I the better 1 I am only brought to see myself in a distressed perishing condition, and can get no further. I answer, 'Tis well thou art got so far, if thou indeed see thyself perishing, and thy drowsy soul awake into any sense of the sadness of thy case. But I intend not thus to leave thee here; therefore let me furthermore demand of thee, What course wouldst thou take in any other distress, wherein thou knowest not what to do to help thyself 1 would not such an exigency, when thou findest thyself pinched and urged on every side, and every way is shut up to thee, that thou art beset with calamities", and canst no a Audio vulgiis cum ad coelum manu9 tendunt nilul aliud quet* Deum dicunt, way turn thyself to avoid them ; would not .such an exigency force thee down on thy knees, and set thee a-crying to the God of mercy for relief and help 1 Would not nature itself prompt to this 1 Is it not natural to lift up hands and eyes to heaven when we know not what to do 1 "^ Therefore having thus far reasoned with thee about thy considering power; let me demand of thee if thou canst yet go somewhat further than considering 1 that i-s, in short, Is it impossible to thee to obey this dictate of nature 1 Imean, represent the deplorable case of th}' soul before him that made it : and crave his mer- ciful relief. Do not dispute the matter ; thou canst not but see this is a possible and a rational course as thy case is. Should not a people seek unto their God 1 Fall down therefore low before him ; prostrate thyself at the foot- stool of his mercy seat. Tell him, thou understandest him to be the Father of spirits, and the Father of mercies ; that thou hast heard of his great mercy and pity towards the spirits of men in their forlorn lapsed state : what a bless- edness he hath designed for them ; what means he hath de- signed to bring them to it. Tell him thou only needest a temper of spirit suitable to this blessedness he invites thee to 1 that thou canst not master and change thy sensual, earthly heart ; thou knowest he easily can ; thou art to im- plore his help, that his blessed and Holy Spirit may de- scend and breathe upon thy stupid, dead soul ; and may sweetly incline and move it towards him ; that it may eternally resi in him ; and that thou may'st not perish, after so much done in order tO thy blessedness, only for want of a heart to entertain it. Tell him, thou comest upon his gracious encouragement, having heard he is as ready to give his Spirit to them that ask him, as parents bread to their craving children rather than a stone : that 'tis for life thou beggest : that 'tis not so easy to thee, to think of perishing for ever; that thou canst not desist and give up all thy hopes ; that thou shalt be in hell shortly if he hear and help thee not. Lastly, If thus thou obtain any communication of that holy, blessed Spirit, and thou find it gently moving thy dead heart, let me once more de- mand of thee : Is it impossible to forbear this or that ex- ternal act of sin at this time, when thou art tempted to it 1 sure thou canst not say, 'tis impossible. What necessitates thee to it 1 And then certainly thou may'st as well ordi- narily withhold thyself from running into such customary sensualities, as to tend to grieve the Spirit, debauch con- science, stupify thy soul, and hide God from thee. And if thou canst do all this, do not fool thy slothful soul with as idle a conceit, that thou hast nothing to do, but to sit still, expecting till thou drop into hell. Doubt 2. But have I not reason to fear, I shall but add sin to sin in all this 1 and so increase the burden of guilt upon my soul ; and by endeavouring to better my case, make it far worse. Two things I consider, that suggest to me this fear, — the manner and end of the duties you put me upon, as they will be done by me in the case wherein I apprehend myself yet to lie. — 1. Manner. As to the positive action you advise to, I have heard, the be.st actions of an unregenerate person are sins, through the sinfulness of their manner of doing them ; though as to the matter of the thing done, they be enjoined and good : and though it be true, that the regenerate cannot perform a sinless duty neither; yet their persons and works being covered over with the righteousness of Christ, are looked upon as having no sin in them, which I apprehend to be none of my case. — 2. End. You put upon me these things in order to the attaining of blessedness; and to do such things with intu- ition to a reward, is to be (as maybe doubted) unwarrant- able, mercenary, and servile. Rcphi. First, As to this former reason of your doubt, methinks the proposal of it answers it. Forasmuch as you acknowledge the matter of these actions to be good and duty, (and plain it is they are moral duties, of common perpetual concernment to all persons and times,) dare you decline or dispute against your duty 1 Sure if we compare the evil of what is so substantially in itself, and what is so circumstantially, only by the adherence of some undue modus or manner : it cannot be hard to determine which is the greater and more dreadful evil. As to the pre.'^ent case ; shouldst thou when the great God sends abroad his proclamation of pardon and peace, refuse to attend it, vulgi iste naturalis est genno. Min. FeJ. Octav. Chap. XVII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 247 to consider the contents of it, and thy own case in re- ference thereto, and thereupon to sue to him lor the life of thy own souH Dost thou not plainly see thy refusal must needs be more provoking than thy defective performance"? This, speaks disability, but that, rebellion and contempt.b Besides, dost thou not see, that thy objection lies as much against every other action of thy life '] The wise man tells us,<= the ploughing of the wicked is sin ; (if that he literally to be understood ;) and what, wouldst thou therefore sit still and do nothing 1 Then how soon would that idleness draw on gross wickedness ! And would not that be a dreadful confutation of thyself, if thou who didst pretend a scruple, that thou mightest not pray, read, hear, meditate, shalt not scruple to play the glutton, the drunkard, the wanton, and indulge thyself in all riot and excess 1 Yea, if thou do not break out into such exorbitancies, would any one think him serious that should say, it were against his conscience to be working out his salvation, and striving to enter in at the strait gate ; seeking first the kingdom of God, &c. Would not this sound strangely 1 And espe- cially, that in the meantime it should never be against his conscience, to trifle away his time, and live in perpetual neglects of God, in persevering atheism, infidelity, hardness of heart, never regretted or striven against; asif these were more innocent 1 And what thou sayst of the different case of the regenerate, is impertinent ; for as to this matter the case is not diflerent, they that take themselves to be such, must not think that by their supposed interest in the righteousness of Christ, their real sins cease to be such, they only become pardoned sins ; and shall they therefore sin more boldly than other men, because they are surer of pardon 1 Secondly, As to the other ground of this doubt, there can only be a fear of sinning, upon this account, to them that make more sins and duties than God hath made. The doubt supposes religion inconsistent with humanity : and that God were about to rase out of the nature of man, one of the most radical and fundamental laws written there, — a desire of blessedness ; — and supposes it against the ex- press .scope and tenor of his whole gospel revelation. For what doth that design, but to bring men to blessedness 1 And how is it a means to compass that design, but as it tends to engage man's spirits to design it too 1 unless we would imagine they should go to heaven blindfold, or be rolled thither as stones that know not whither they are moved; in which case the gospel, that reveals the eternal glory, and the way to it, were a useless thing. If so express words had not been in the Bible, as that Moses had respect to the recompense of reward ; yea, that our Lord Jesus himself, for the joy set before him endured the cross, &c., this had been a little more colourable, or more modest. And what, do not all men, in all the ordinary actions of their lives, act allowably enough, with intuition to much lower endsl even those particular ends which the works of their several callings tend to, else they should act as brutes in every thing they do. And would such a one scru- ple, if he were pining for want of bread, to beg or labour for it for this end, to be relieved 1 'Tis the mistaking of the notion of heaven that hath also an ingrediency into this doubt, if it be really a doubt. Whaf? is it a low thing to be filled with the Divine fulness 1 to have his glory replenish- ing our souls 1 to be perfectly freed from sin? in every thing conformed unto this holy nature and will 1 That our minding our interest in this, or any affairs, should be the principal thing with us, is not to be thought; our supreme end must be the same with his, who made all things for himself, of whom, through whom, and to whom all things are, that he alone might have the glory. But subordinates need not quarrel. A lower end doth not exclude the higher, but serves it : and is, as to it, a means. God is our end as he is to be glorified and enjoyed by us : our glorifying him is but the agniiion of his glory ; which we do most in beholding and partaking it; which is therefore in direct subordination thereto. Doitbt 3. But it may further be doubted. What if it be acknowledged, that these are both things possible and law- ful ; yet to what purpose will it be to attempt any thing in b Therefore as to that fbnn of expression— tliat such acts of unregenerate men are sm" The wicked shall he turned into hell, and all the people that forget God. That heap, that mass of wickedness, of pride, of persecution, cursins:, blasphemv, deceit, and mischief, all meet in one that hath. not God in all his thoughts. fh'onpha glass, beyond that which we have by hearing a reported descriptioB of him. thoiiijh by himself unseen. This is acquaintance with God. q 1 Kinffs ix 3. Job x.xxvi. 7. Psal .wxiii- 18. and ixxiv. IS. r Cant ii u. s Psal. rvi ?. xw. 15. 1 1 John v. 19, SO. u 1 John iii. S. x Psal. 1. T P««' ix. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XVIII But who is so hardy to look the holy God in the face, and sin against him ! What an astonishment is it, when he watches over present sin, or brings forth former sins out of secret darkness, and sets them in the light of his countenance ! Who that understands any thing of the na- ture and majesty of God, dare call him for a witness of his sinning"? The worst of men would find themselves under some restraint, could they but obtain of themselves, to sit down sometimes, and soleimaly think of God. Much more would it prove an advantage to them, (whom I most intend,) such as sin within the nearer call and reach of mercy ; that sin not to the utmost latitude ; even such as lead the strictest lives, and are seldomer found to transgress. Are not their sins wont to begin with forgetting Godl Did they eye God more, would they not sin less frequent- ly, and with greater regret 1 You his saints, that have made a covenant with him by sacrifice, that profess the greatest love and devotedness to him, and seem willing yourselves to become sacrifices, and lay down your lives for his sake ; what, is it a harder thing to give him a look, a thought ! or is it not too common a thing, without ne- cessity, (and then not without injury,) to withhold these from him "? Let us bethink oui'selves, are not the princi- pal distempers of our spirits, and disorders yet observable in our lives, to be referred hither 1 As to enjoined ser- vices ; what should we venture on omissions, if we had God in our eye 1 or serve him with so declining, backward hearts 1 Should we dare to let pass a day, m the even whereof we might write down, Nothing done for God this day 1 Or should we serve him as a hard master, with sluggish, despondent spirits 1 The apostle forbids ser- vants to serve with eye-service, as men-pleasers ; meaning they should eye men less, and God more. Sure, as to him, our service is not enough eye-service. We probably eye men more than we should ; but we do not eye him enough. Hence such hanging of hands, such feebleness of knees, such laziness and indifferenc}', so little of an ac- tive zeal and laborious diligence, so little fervency of spirit in serving the Lord. Hence also such an aversion to hazardous services, such fear of attempting any thing (though never so apparent important duty) that may prove costly, or hath danger in it. We look not to him that is invisible. And as to forbidden things ; should we be so proud, so passionate, so earthly, so sensual, if we had God more in view 1 should we so much seek ourselves, and indulge our own wills and humours, drive a design with such solicitude and intention of mind for our private in- terests "? Should we walk at such a latitude, and more con- sult our own inclination than our rule, allow ourselves in so much vanity of conversation, did we mind God as we ought 1 And do we not sensibly punish ourselves in this neglect 1 What a dismal chaos is this world while we see not God in it ! To live destitute of a Divine presence, to discern no beam of the heavenly glory ; to go up and down day by day, and perceive nothing of God, no glim- mering, no appearance; this is disconsolate as well as sinful darkness. What can we make of creatures, what of the daily events of Providence, if we see not in them the glory of a Deity ; if we do not contemplate and adore the Divine wisdom, power, and goodness, diffused every where 1 Our practical atheism, and inobservance of God, make the world become to us the region and shadow of death, states us as among ghosts and spectres, makes all things look with a ghastly face, imprints death upon every thing we see, encircles us with gloomy, dreadful shades, and with uncomfortable apparitions. To behold the tragical spectacles always in view, the violent lusts, the rapine and rage of some, the calamitous sufferings, the miseries and ruins of others; to hear every corner re- sounding Avith the insultations of the oppressor, and the mournful groans of the oppressed ; what a painful con- tinuing death were it to be in the world without God ! At the best, all things were but a vanishing scene, an image seen in the dark. The creation a thing the fashion whereof were passing away, the whole contexture and system of Providence were mere confusion, without the least con- cinnity or order; religion an acknowledged trifle, a mere mockery ! What, to wink ourselves into so much darkness z Sio certe vivendura est tanciuam in conspectu vivamus, &c. Sen. Epist lifxiu. and desolation, and by sealing up our eyes against the Di- vine light and glory, to '•'.nfirm so formidable mis?rie? upon our own soul* ' How dreadfully shall we herein re- venge our own folly, in nullifying him to ourselves, who is the all in all ! Sure there is little of heaven in all this ! But if now we open our eyes upon that all-comprehending glory, apply them to a steady intuition of God, how heaven- ly a life shall we then live in the world ! To have God always in view, as the director and end of all our actions ; to make our eye crave leave of God, to consult him ere we adventure upon any thing, and implore his guidance and blessing; upon all occasions to direct our prayers to him and look up ; to make our eye wait his commanding look, ready to receive all intimations of his will ; this is an an- gelic life. To be as those ministers of his that are always ready to do his pleasure ; to make our eye do him homage, and express our dependance and trust ; to approve our- selves in every thing to him, and act as always in his pre- sence, observing still how his eye observes us, and expo- sing ourselves willingly to its inspection and search, con- tented always he should see through and tlirough us ; surely there is much of heaven in this life; so we should endeavour to live here. I cannot omit to give you this instruction in the words of a heathen. ^ We ought, (saith he) so to live, as always within view, order our cogitatiims as if some one might or ca.n look into the very inwards of our breast. Por to what purpose is it, to hide any thing from man 7 from God nothing can he hid ; he is continually pre- sent to our spirits, and comes amidst our inmost thoughts, &c. This is to walk in the light, amidst a serene, placid, mild light, that infuses no unquiet thoughts, admits no guilty fears, nothing that can disturb or annoy us. To eye God in all our comforts, and observe the smiling as- pects of his face, when he dispenses them to us ; to eye him in all our afflictions, and consider the paternal wisdom that instructs us in them ; how would this increase our mercies, and mitigate our troubles ! To eye him in all his creatures, and observe the various prints of the Cre- ator's glory stamped upon them; with how lively a lustre would it clothe the world, and make every thing look with a pleasant face ! What a heaven were it to look upon God, as filling all in all ! and how sweetly would it, ere-while, raise our souls into some such sweet seraphic strains, "" Holy, holy, — the whole earth is full of his glory ! To eye him in his providences, and consider how all events are with infinite wisdom disposed into an apt subserviency to his holy will and ends; what difficulties would hence be solved ! what seeming inconsistencies reconciled ! and how much would it contribute to the ease and quiet of our minds ! To eye him in his Christ, the express image of his person, the brightness of his glory ; and in the Chris- tian economy, the gospel revelation and ordinances, through which he manifests himself; to behold him in the posture wherein he saves souls, clad with the garments of salvation, girt with power, and apparelled with love, travelling in the greatness of his strength, mighty to save : to view him addressing himself to allure and win to him the hearts of sinners, when he discovers himself in Christ, upon that reconciling design, makes grace that brings sal- vation appear, teaching to deny ungodliness, &c. to behold him entering into human flesh, pitching his tabernacle among men, hanging out his ensigns of peace, laying his trains, spreading his net, the cords of a man, the bands ol love: to see him in his Christ, ascending the cross, lifted up to draw all men to him ; and consider that mighty love of justice and of souls, both so eminently conspicuous in that stupendous sacrifice; here to fix our eyes looking to Jesus, and beholding him whom we have pierced : to see his power and glory, as they were wont to be seen in his sanctuaries; to observe him in the solemnities of his wor- ship, and the graceful postures wherein he holds com- munion with his saints, when he seats himself amidst them on the throne of grace, receives their addresses, dispenses the tokens and pledges of his love : into what transports might these visions put us every day! Let us then stir up our drowsy souls, open our heavy eyes, and turn them upon God, inure and habituate them to a constant view of his (yet veiled) face, that we may not a laa. vi, % 3. Chap. XVIII. THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE RIGHTEOUS. 253 see him only by casual glances, but as those that seek his face, and make it ourbusine.ss to gain a thorough knowledge of him. But let us remember, that all our present visions of God must aim at a furtlier conformity to him; they must design imitation, not the satisfying of curiosity : our looking must not therefore be an inquisitive, bu.sy prying into the unrevealed things of God. Carefully abstain from .such over-bold presumptuous looks. But remember, we are to eye God as our pattern. Wherein he is to be so, he hath plainly enough revealed and proposed himself to us. And consider, this is the pattern, both to which we ought and to which we shall be conformed, if we make it our business ; so will sense of duty and hope of success concur to fix our eye and keep it steady. Especially, let us endeavour to manage and guide our eye aright, in be- holding him, that our sight of him may most effectually subserve this design of being like him ; and herein nothing will be more conducible, than that our looks be qualified with — reverence, and — love. 1. Let them be reverential looks. We shall never be careful to imitate a despised pattern, or that we think meanly of When this is the intimate sense of our soul. Who is a God like unto thee in holiness "? there is none holy as the Lord : this will set our powers on work ; such sights will command and over-awe our souls into conformity to him. Subjects have sometimes afliected to imitate the very im- perfections and deformities of their adored prince. Let us greaten our thoughts of God. Look to him with a sub- missive, adoring eye. Let every look import worship and subjection. Who can stand before apprehended sovereign majesty with such a temper of soul as shall signify an aff"ront to it ? This will make every thing as suitable to God, yield and render our souls susceptible of all divine and holy im- pre.ssions. 2. Let them be friendly and (as far as may consist with that reverence) amorous looks. 'Tis natural to affect and endeavour likeness to them we love. Let love always sit in our eye, and inspirit it ; this will represent God always amiable, will infinitely commend us to his nature and at- tributes, and even ravish us into his likeness. The loving spouse often glories to wear her beloved husband's picture on her breast. The love of God will much more make us affect to bear his image in our hearts. His law is a true representation of him, and lave is the fulfilling of that law, an exemplification of it in ourselves. Love will never enter a quarrel, nor admit of any disagreement with God. His more terrible appearances will be commendable in the eye of love. It thinks no evil. But so interprets and com- ments upon his severer aspects, whether through his law or providence, as to judge all amiable, and frame the soul to an answerable deportment. 2. In this way then let us endeavour a growing con- formity unto God. It hath been much (and not unneces- sarily) inculcated already, that the blessedness of the right- eous hereafter, doth not consist merely in beholding an ex- ternal, objective glory, but in being also glorified. They are happy by a participated glory; by being made like God, as well as seeing his glorious likeness ; whereby the constitution of their spirits is changed and reduced to that excellent, harmonious, agreeable temper, that holy com- posure and peaceful state, from which blessedness is inse- parable. As far as we are capable of blessedness in this world, it must be so with us here. Glory without us will not make us happy in heaven; much less will any thing without us make us happy on earth. 'Tis an idle dream, of sickly, crazy minds, that their blessedness consists in some external good, that is separable and distant from them ; which therefore as they blindly guess, they uncertainly pur- sue ; never aiming to become good, without which thev can never know what it is to be blessed What felicity are men wont to imagine to themselves in this or that change of their outward condition ! were their state such orsuch, then they were happy, and should desire no more. As the child's fancy suggests to it, if it were on the top of such a hill, it could touch the heavens, but when with much toil It hath got thither, it finds itself as far off as before. We have a shorter and more compendious way to it, would we b Epist. 92. c Max. Tjr. dissert. 2. who adds, For a good man cannot receive detiimeiit from an evil man. allow ourselves to understand it. A right temper fif mind involves blessedness in itself; 'tis this only change we need to endeavour. We wear out our days in vanity and misery, while we neglect this work, and busy ourselves to catch a fugitive shadow, that hovers about us. It can never be well, till our own souls be a heaven to us. and blessedness be a domestic, a home dwelling inhabitant there. Till we get a settled principle of holy quietude into our own breasts, and become the sons of peace, with whom the peace of God may find entrance and abode ; till we have that treasure within us, that may render us insensible of any dependence on a foreign good, or fear of a foreign evil. Shall that be the boa.st and glory of a philosojdier only, I carry all my goods with me wherever I go 1 and that, A virtuous, good man, is liable to no hurt 1 f Seneca thinks "they discover a low spirit, that .say, exieri.als can add any thing (though but a very liule) to the felicity of an honest "mind; asif(saith he) men could not be content with the light of the sun without the help of a candle or a spark." And speaking of the constancy of the virtuous man, (saith he,) " They do ill that say, such an evil is tolerable to him, such a one intolerable, and that confine the great- ness of his mind within certain bounds and limits. Adver- sity (he tells us) overcomes us, if it be not wholly over- come. Epicurus, (saith he,) the very patron of your sloth, acknowledges yet, that unhappy events can seldom disturb the mind of a virtuous person, (and he adds,) how had he almost uttered, the voice of a man ! 1 pray, (saith he,)speak out a little more boldly, and say he is above them altoge- ther. "= Such apprehensions the more virtuous heathens have had of the efficacy and defensative power of n;oral goodness, however defective their notion might be of the thing itself Hence Socrates the pagan martyr is reported to have cried out, (when those persons were persecuting him to death,) Anytus and Meletus can kill me, but they cannot hurt me. And Anaxarchus the philosopher, having sharply reproved Nicocreon, and being by him ordered to be beaten to death with iron mallets, bids. Strike on, strike on, thou mayest (saith he) J break in pieces this vessel of Anaxar- chus, but Anaxarchus himself thou canst not touch. Shall Chri-stianity here confess itself outvied ? shall we, to the reproach of our religion, yield the day to pagan mo- rality, and renew the occasion of the ancient complaint, « that the faith of Christians is out-done by the huithcn infide- lity'} It is, I remember, the challenge of Cicilius in Mi- nutius. " There is Socrates (saith he) the prince of wis- dom, whosoever of you Christians is great enough to at- tempt it, let him imitate him if he can." Methinks we should be ambitious to tell the world in our lives, (for Christians should live great things, not speak them,f) that a greater than Socrates is here : to let them see in us our represent- ed pattern: to show forth higlier virtues than those of Socrates; even his, who hath called us out of darkness into his glorious and marvellous light. Certain it is, thai the sacred oracles of the gospel set before us a more ex- cellent pattern, and speak things not less magnificent, but much more modest and perspicuous; with less pomp of words they give us a much clearer account of a far more excellent temper of mind, and prescribe the direct and certain way of attaining it. (Do but view over the many passages of Scripture occa.sionally glanced ai. Chap. 7.) But we grope as in the dark for blessedness; we stumble at noon-day as in the night, and wander as if we had no eyes ; we mistake our business, and lay the scene of a happy state at a great distance f'rom us, in thines which we cannot reach, and which if we could it were to little purpose. Not to speak of greater sensualists, (whom at present I have less in my eye,) is there not a more refined sort of persons, that neglecting the great business of inspecting, and labouring to better and improve their spirits, are wholly taken up about the affairs of another sphere ; that are more solicitous for better times, for a better world, than better spirits ; that seem to think that all the hajipiness they are capable of on earth, is bound up in this or that exter- nal state of things 1 Not that the care of all public con- cernments should be laid aside; least of all, a just solici- d Dio?en. Laert. Anaxarctius. e Non pnnstat fides quod pra-stitit infidelitas. r A3 tliis author's exprc.-sioii is. 254 THE BLESSEDNESS OP THE RIGHTEOUS. Chap. XVIII. tude for the church's welfare : but that should not be pre- tended, when our own interest is the one thing with us. And when we are really solicitous about the church's in- terests, we should state them aright. God designs the af- flictions of his people for their spiritual good, therefore that is a much greater good, than their exemption from suffering these evils ; otherwise his means should cat up his end, and be more expensive thaji that will countervail ; which were an imprudence no man of tolerable discretion would be guilty of We should desire the outward pros- perity of Sion, for it is a real good; but inasmuch as it hath in it the goodness, not of an end, but only (and that but sometimes neither) of a means ; not a constant, but a mutual goodness; not a principal, but a lesser subordinate goodness ; we must not desire it absolutely, nor chiefly, but with submissive limited desires. If our hearts are grieved to hear of the sufl^erings of the church of God in the world, but not of their sins ; if we more sensibly re- gret, at any time, the persecutions and oppressions they undergo, than their spiritual distempers, their earthliness, pride, cold love to God, fervent animosities towards each other; it speaks an uninstructed carnal mind. We take no right measure of the interests of religion, or the church's welfare, and do most probabl}' mistake ourselves as much in our judging of our own ; and measure theirs by our own mistaken model. And this is the mischievous cheat many put upon their own souls, and would obtrude too often upon others too ; that overlooking the great design of the gospel, to trans- form men's spirits and change them into the Divine like- ness, they think 'tis religion enough to espouse a party, and adopt an opinion; and then vogue themselves friends to religion according to the measure of their zeal for their own party or opinion ; and give a very pregnant proof of that zeal, by magnifying or inveighing against the times, according as they favour or frown upon their empty, un- spirited religion. It being indeed such (a secret conscious- ness whereof they herein bewray) as hath no other life in it, than what it owes to external favour and countenance. And therefore all public rebukes are justly apprehended mortal to it ; whereas that substantial religion that ade- quately answers the design, and is animated by the spirit of the gospel, possesses the souls of them that own it, with a secure confidence, that it can live in any times, and hold their souls in life also. Hence they go on their way with a free unsolicitous cheerfulness, enjoying silently in their own bosoms that repose and rest which naturally results from a sound and well-composed temper of spirit. They know their happiness depends upon nothing without them.s That they hold it by a better tenure than that of the world's courtesy. They can be quiet in the midst of storms, and abound in the want of all things. They can in patience possess their own souls, and in them a vital spring of true pleasure, when they are driven out of all other possessions. They know the living sense of these words. That the good man is satisfied from himself: That to be spiritually-minded is life and peace: That nothing can harm them that are followers of the good : That the way to see good days, is to keep their tongues from evil, and their lips from speaking guile, to depart from evil and do good, to seek peace and pursue it. They cannot live in bad times ; they carry that about them that will make the worst days good to them. Surely they can never be happy in the best times, that cannot be so in any. Outward prosperity is quite besides the purpose to a distempered soul ; when nothing else troubles, it will torment itself Besides, we cannot command at pleasure the benign as- pects of the world, the smiles of the times ; we may wait a life's-time, and still find the same adverse posture of things towards us from without. What dotage is it to place our blessedness in something to us impossible, that lies wholly out of our power ; and in order v.'hereto we have nothing to do, but sit down and wish ; and either faintly hope, or ragingly despair 1 We cannot change times and seasons, nor alter the course of the world, create new heavens and new earth. Would we not think ourselves mocked, if God should command us these things in order gl^itOTOV s'aaii Kai xapaKrrip,ov6i:7roTC £j eavTov TrpoaioKa axpcXciav r/ fi\il3riv, aXX' aiTO tuivcI^m