MAIN DEPT. BIOLOGY LIBRARY G MATERIALS FOR A MONOGRAPH OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ORTHOPTERA. BY SAMUEL H. SCUDDER [From the Boston Journal of Natural History, Vol. VII. No. 3.] CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON. 1862. BIOLOGY LIBRARY G MAiN . LTURE DEFT. ART* VIIL Materials for a Monograph of the North American Orthoptera^ including a Catalogue of the known New England Species. By SAMUEL H. SCUDDER. [Read May 21st, 1862.] THE North American Orthoptera have been very much neglected, very little special attention having been paid to them ; for besides the earlier general works of Lin- neus, Fabricius, De Geer, Stoll, and Palisot de Beauvais, and the more recent ones of Burmeister and Serville, which included descriptions of North American Orthop- tera among others, the only other notices of our species have been in the few scattered descriptions by Say, Hal- deman, Kirby, Girard, and myself, if we except only these two : Harris's mention of the New England Orthoptera in his " Report on Insects of New England Injurious to JOURNAL B. S. N. H. 52 NOVEMBER, 1862. 51723: 410 * $La}erj,alS'Jor a Monograph "Vegetation," which, though very meagre indeed, is yet a fuller treatment of them than has been given by him to any other group in his Report ; and De Saussure's short diagnoses of new species in the " Revue et Magasin de Zoologie," about three years since, which have reference principally to tropical forms. My earliest intention in this paper was to restrict my- self to a critical revision of the Orthoptera of New Eng- land, known to me, whether described or undescribed; and this has continued to be the main purpose of the article, in its present form, more enlarged, because it was readily seen that a much better understanding might be obtained of the peculiarities of its fauna by compar- isons, the more extended the better, with species closely allied from without its limits. This has been the case, particularly among the Locustarice ; and it is hoped that some better understanding may thereby be had of the Orthopteran fauna of the whole of North America.* To further my purposes I solicited the assistance of many of my friends, and have invariably received their kindest cooperation. The original collection of Dr. T. W. Harris, in the Society's possession, has been invaluable to me ; for by it I have been enabled to know exactly the extent of his knowledge of our fauna, as well as to de- termine his species directly from his types. The collec- tion of the Museum of Comparative Zoology has been of great assistance to me, containing as it does many species I could not otherwise have seen from the southern * The whole number of species mentioned is 115, of which 78 are found in New England, distributed among the different families as follows: Whole No. From New England. Forficulariae .- : ;: -'V' "' ? - ' : "" *''.>'*, 2 2 Blattariae .,;,,.- ,4- : -. ; - i ..-f ,-...../> ,,i>,j' : 9 7 Phasmida . . . f . . ; . . . . 1 1 Gryllides '.'^ ; 'L '" ''v' -^ V 14 11 Locustariae * ^>-s .- .' a'. >.]. . . 41 16 Acrydii . ,,../- .,, .. ._ ..... ( < . . 48 41 115 78 of the North American Orthoptera. 411 and western portions of our country, besides the New England collection of Mr. A. Agassiz. To Mr. P. R. Uhler, of Baltimore, - almost the only one in our coun- try who studies the Orthoptera, I am greatly indebted, both for many valuable suggestions, and for some very interesting insects from various parts of our Union, and especially for the opportunity of examining many species of CeuthophiluSi new to me. From Mr. F. G. Sanborn I have received very rich collections from Massachusetts, including the Orthoptera of the State Cabinet. My thanks are also due to Miss A. M. Edmands, of Cambridge ; Messrs. C. A. ShurtlefF, of Brookline, Mass. ; Edward Norton, of Farmington, Conn* ; and A. S. Packard, Jr., of Brunswick, Me., who have generously placed all their collections from their several vicinities in my hands, and to Mr. C. Thomas, of Murphysboro', Illinois, for many specimens from that State. By my own collections along the route taken by Sir John Richardson in Northwest America, I have been enabled to determine the few species described by Kirby, as well as to add others to its fauna, and by specimens collected for a number of years in the New England States, to add considerably to my material for this investigation* Such have been my opportunities for the study of our Orthoptera, so far as native species are concerned ; but there have also been of very material assistance to me in generic determinations, - the large series of European Orthoptera in the Cambridge Museum, and a very fully represented and beautiful collection of European species which I have received from Herrn Brunner von Wattenwyl, who has in his possession the original collection which formed the basis of Fischer's elaborate work. I have only made mention in this paper of species which I have myself seen, with but a single exception Ceuthophilus scabripes, and have endeavored to verify 412 Materials for a Monograph every synonymical reference. Of the work of Stoll, I have only been able to make a hasty examination, with- out the opportunity of direct comparison with specimens ; and the references to Palisot de Beauvais are not so com- plete as they would have been had I ever seen a perfect copy. In my references to Harris's Report, I have quoted the last (third) edition only, because it is better known, has illustrations of many species, and there has been no essential alteration in the text of the three editions. To those who would not otherwise understand the claim of prior description in some cases, I would say that the first edition was published in 1841. I have also made full ref- erences to his " Catalogue of the Insects of Massachu- setts," (published in 1835, in Hitchcock's " Report on the Geology, Mineralogy, Botany, and Zoology of Massachu- setts," and also in a smaller volume extracted from it, under the title, " Catalogue of the Animals and Plants of Massachusetts,") not because the names given there have any value in questions of priority, but because Dr. Harris had sent away many collections correspondingly labelled. To prevent misunderstanding, I may state that where I have not indicated the number of specimens examined, it is to be taken for granted that I have seen a consider- able number ; and where no reference is made to the sexes seen, I have examined both. The measurements given have been, so far as possible, average measure- ments. The length of the body has been given as a straight line, connecting (in the natural attitude of the" Orthopteron) the tip of the vertex and the extremity of the abdomen excluding the ovipositor in the females of Gryllides and Locustarise, and including the inarticulated abdominal appendages in the males ; the length of the ovipositor is given as a straight line, connecting its tip with the point of junction of the upper and lower valves at its base. of the North American Orthoptera. 413 For more easy reference I have prefixed an asterisk (*) to such species as I have seen from New England. In giving localities, I have only referred to those from which I have myself seen specimens, and have appended to them the names of the collectors ; or where that was not known, the person from whom I received them. I add here a Table for the more ready determination of the genera, which I have made as simple and concise as possible. It is strictly limited to the genera of New Eng- land, and is not intended for reference to the species out- side its limits. A TABLE TO FIND THE GENERA OF NEW ENGLAND ORTHOPTERA. 1. Hind legs longest; hind femora thickened 4 1. Legs of nearly equal length; hind femora not thickened ... 2 2. Abdomen armed behind with a forceps . . . (Forficularice) 6 2. Abdomen not armed behind with a forceps 3 3. Body broad and flat (Blatlarice) 7 3. Body long and exceedingly slender, with slender legs. (Phasmida) Diapheromera. 4. Antennaj long and tapering 5 4. Antennae short . (Acrydii) 23 5. Wing covers with the outer portion bent abruptly downwards. ( Gryllides) 11 5. Wing covers sloping downwards at the sides . . (Locuslarice) 15 FORFICULARICE. 6. Antennae with less than 12 joints Labia. 6. Antennae with more than 20 joints Labidura. BLATTARI^E. 7. Winged 8 7. Wingless Pycnoscelus. 8. Females with developed wings ......... 9 8. Females with rudimentary wings Stylopyga. 9. Basal joints of tarsi longer than the others 10 9. Basal joints of tarsi shorter than the others Ectobia. 10. Supraanal plate deeply fissured Periplaneta. 10. Supraanal plate not deeply fissured Platamodes. GRYLLIDES. 11. Fore-tibiae broad 12 11. Fore-tibiae slender . 13 12. Insect large Gryllotalpa. 12. Insect small Tridactylus. 13. Hind-femora stoutish ........... 14 13. Hind-femora slender (Ecanthus. 414 Materials for a Monograph 14. Last joint of the maxillary palpi of the same length as the penultimate Gryllus. 14. Last joint of the maxillary palpi double the length of the penultimate Nemobius. LOCUSTARI^E. 15. Wingless, or with rudimentary wings and wing-covers . . . .16 15. Winged 17 16. Wingless; pronotum not extended over meso- and metanotum . Ceuthophilus. 16. With rudimentary wings and wing-covers ; pronotum extended over meso- and metanotum Thyreonotus. 17. Wing-covers expanded in the middle ....... 18 17. Wing-covers not expanded in the middle 20 18. Wing-covers much broadened in the middle, concave . . Cyrtophyllus. 18. Wing-covers somewhat broadened in the middle, not concave . . .19 19. Ovipositor very small Microcentrum. 19. Ovipositor of medium size Phylloptera. 20. Vertex of the head with a conical projection forwards . Conocephalus. 20. Vertex of the head without a conical projection 21 21. Ovipositor straight, or very nearly so; insect small . . Xiphidium. 21. Ovipositor curved ; insect large 22 22. Ovipositor curved sharply upwards Phaneroptera. 22. Ovipositor ensiform ......... Orchelimum. ACRYDII. 23. Pronotum produced backwards, covering abdomen . . . . .31 23. Pronotum not produced backwards over abdomen .... 24 24. Antenna? broad and flattened at base, acuminate . . . Opomala. 24. Antennas filiform, or slightly flattened 25 25. Prosternum with a slender central spine . . . . . . .26 25. Prosternum without a spine 28 26. Sternal spine prominent 27 26. Sternal spine but slightly raised Arcyptera. 27. Lateral carinas of pronotum more or less prominent ; medial carina scarcely elevated ; extremity of abdomen of males much swollen . Caloptenus. 27. Lateral carina? of pronotum wanting; medial carina generally prominent ; extremity of abdomen in males not swollen . . . Acridium. 28. Front, nearly perpendicular, generally swollen; vertex not prom- inent (Edipoda. 28. Front considerably oblique, sloping inwards; vertex prominent . . 29 29. Hind-border of pronotum sharply angulated .... Tragocephala. 29. Hind-border of pronotum docked or rounded ...... 30 30. Foveolse on the vertex; lateral carinae of pronotum incurved . Stenobothrus. 30. No foveolas on the vertex; lateral carinas of pronotum parallel or nearly so Chloealtis. 31. Pronotum arched roundly . Batrachidea. 31. Pronotum nearly or quite horizontal ....... 32 32. Antennae 13-14 jointed Tettix. 32. Antenna? 22 jointed . Tettigidea. of the North American Orthoptera. 415 FORFICULARUE, Latreille. SPONGOPHORA, SERVILLE (emend.) * 1. S. BIPUNCTATA, HOV. Sp. The head, antennae, and prothorax are reddish brown ; eyes black ; elytra darker brown, with a rather large pale spot equi-distant from the base and either border ; wings at rest, extending nearly twice as far back as the elytra, pale, with a dark brown band along the inner edge be- yond the elytra; there is a faintly impressed longitudinal line on the prothorax. Length from front of prothorax to tip of wings, .3 in. I place this species in this genus with some degree of doubt, because I have but a single mutilated specimen to examine, which wants abdomen and legs, the elytra and wings of one side, and the principal part of the antennae ; but the parts that remain exhibit good specific characters. Mass. (H. Coll.) Taken May 30. 1 specimen. LABIA, LEACH. * 1. L. MINUTA, nov. sp. Thorax, elytra, and exposed portion of wings yellowish brown, covered with shortish hairs; middle of abdomen reddish brown ; sides of the abdomen above and the head dark reddish brown approaching a black ; last segment of abdomen and forceps reddish brown; abdomen also and forceps thickly beset with shortish hairs ; legs shining pale yellow ; parts of the mouth and antennae yellowish brown ; abdomen beneath brownish yellow ; $ forceps slender, of nearly equal width throughout, curving outwards slightly at the middle, and then inwards towards the tip ; slightly falciform, and meeting only at the tip ; minute triangular black teeth on the lower inner edge ; 9 forceps diminish- ing in size to the tip, which is very slightly curved in- wards ; otherwise they are straight, meeting along the whole inner edge, which is toothed as in the $ ; tips as 416 Materials for a Monograph united together rounded, very slightly shorter than in the so commonly in use, which was not proposed till four years later. If, however, the species having but two of the slender appen- dages at the termination of the posterior tibiae should be found to differ generically from those having three, Tri- dactylus would have to be retained for the latter, with Heteropus as a synonym ; and Xya should be applied to the former. That this may yet be found to be the truth, is indicated still further by the fact that the three-fingered species found in this country have a peculiar conformation of the anterior tibiae, which, however, is a feature of the structure of the male alone, a fact for which I am in- debted to the scrutiny and kind communication of Mr. Uhler; this peculiarity is a lateral projection of an ad- uncate appendage inwards at the base, to the extremity of which, beside the hook, the tarsi are attached. As a fig- ure will explain much better than any description I can give the form of these parts, I have drawn the anterior tibiae and tarsi of T. apicalis. Say <. In the two species (T. apicalis, Say, and T. terminalis, Uhl.) which show this character, a further difference is to be seen between the males and females, in the more swollen prothorax of the former. of the North American Orthoptera. 425 1. T. APICALIS, Say, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phil. ; IV. 310. (Fig. 1.) (1825.) T. apicalis^ Say, Ent. of N. Am. (ed. Le Conte) ; II. 239. (1859.) Xya apicalis, Burm., Handb. d. Ent. ; II. 742. (1838.) This is our largest species, the length of the body being fully one third of an inch in both sexes, and of a lighter color than the other species. I suspect that Say had speci- mens both of this and T. terminalis, Uhl., and confounded them together ; his description applies best to this, while he endeavored to include them both when he said, " length, more than one fifth of an inch." Alabama, Prof. Hentz, (H. Coll.) Kentucky, Mr. J. P. Wild, (Uhler.) 2 ,1 9. *2. T. TERMINALIS, Uhler Mss. This species is darker than T. apicalis^ the head and thorax being sometimes pitchy black, at others showing upon these parts reddish brown spots similarly disposed to those upon T. apicalis ; the two broad transverse fasciae and the terminal spot upon the outside of posterior femora, which are only faintly indicated in T. apicalis, are here black and very distinct ; the wings reach only the tip of the abdomen, while in the males of T. apicalis they extend considerably beyond it ; it is a much smaller species than the preceding, and occupies a more northern area. Length from .25 to .30 inches. Cambridge, Mass., May 20, (H. Coll.) Maryland, (Uhler.) So. Illinois, (Thomas, Uhler.) 1 blam- ing Harris for a mistake never made by him, (see below, under (Ecanthus niveus^ p. 432,) who, he says, " was evi- dently unacquainted with the work of De Geer and the characters he assigns to these insects, or he would have been aware of his error, the marks by which this species is distinguished being so plain, and so explicitly stated by that author." How was it possible for so acute an ob- server as Dr. Fitch to overlook the close resemblance between De Geer's figure (save in the length of the wings), and our common Nemobius vittatus, Harr., and refer the species to (Ecanthus^ especially when (Ecanthi of the same sex are figured upon the same plate ! Moreover, is it not " explicitly stated by that author," in his description of G. fasciatus, that the posterior femora are stout and very wide, that the tibias of the same pair have long spines, and that the head and thorax are more hairy than ordinarily ? Are these characters of (Ecanthus^ or of Ne- mobius and Gryllus? Burmeister has already intimated that the relations of this very species are with Gryllus rather than with (Ecanthus. (Burm., Handb. II. 733.) (ECANTHUS, SERVILLE. * 1. CE. NIVEUS, Serv., Ann. Sc. Nat. ; XXII. 135. (1831.) (Ecanthus niveus, Serv., Hist. Nat. d. Orth. ; 361. (1839.) " Harr., Cat. Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) " " Harr., Report, 3d e.d. ; 154, figs. 71, 72. (1862.) " " Fitch, 3d Report, Noxious Ins. N. Y. ; 131. (1856.) Gryllus niveus, De Geer, Mern. ; III. 522, pi. 43, fig. 6. (1773.) Oliv., Enc. Meth. ; IV. 637. (1791.) (Ecanthus cylindricus, Say Mss., and Harr., Cat. Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) 432 Materials for a Monograph (Ecanthus fasciatus. Fitch, 3d Report, Noxious Ins. N. Y. ; 132 (omitting reference). (1856.) Not only do individuals of this species differ from one another, as Fitch mentions in his distinctions between (E. niveus and (E. fasciatus, but even to a much greater extent, some males having three branches of the " fiddle-bow," and some even five, while they take their origin and ter- mination at very different points in different individuals, and vary besides very much in coloration, many individ- uals being met with of quite a dark color, especially upon the abdomen and legs. These all belong, however, to one species, no differences being discoverable upon which true natural groups can be founded ; nor are there any such concomitant characters among them as Fitch asserts ; neither did Harris make any such blunder as to have mis- understood the sexes in this^ genus as is alleged by him. It would be strange indeed if an entomologist were not acquainted with the very apparent differences existing between them in the prolonged ovipositor of the female, and peculiar structure of the wing-covers in the male. Mass., (H. Coll., Miss Edmands, Sanborn, Shurtleff, S. H. S.) Conn., (Norton, S. H. S.) I have never met with Gryllus bipunctatus, De Geer, which Fitch refers to under the name of (E. punctulatus. (3d Rep. 133). LOCUSTARI^3, Latreille. In a paper OH the genus Raphidophora, (Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. ; VIII. 6,) I enumerated the known species inhabiting the United States, amounting in all to three, and added to them descriptions of four others. Since then I have had an opportunity of examining many other species from various parts of the country, through the kindness of Mr. Uhler, arid have made a study of others in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, so that the num- ber of species is found to be very considerable, and to of the North American Orthoptera. 433 form quite a distinct feature of the North American Orthopteran fauna. I was able to show there that R. xanthostomd) Scudd. should not be united in the same genus with the others, and that R. subterranea, Scudd. had features in its structure which lacked conformity with those possessed by other members of the genus. A closer and more extended study has convinced me that there are here three well-marked genera, and that no one of them can properly be referred to Rhaphidophora. Ceuthophilus may be applied to the more abundant forms, living in concealment under stones, with which must be associated R. stygia, Scudd., found in the shallow Hickman's Cave ; of this genus I am acquainted with no less than twelve species, besides one which I have not seen, Phal. scabripes, Hald., undoubtedly belonging here. Under the genus Hadenoecus we may place R. subterranea, Scudd., restricted to the deep caves of Kentucky, while Tropidischia is pro- posed for the genus under which R. xanthostoma^ Scudd. of California, should be placed. CEUTHOPHILUS, Nov. gen. (mtfof, ttog). Head rather large, oval; antennas long, slender, cylin- drical ; first joint as broad as long, larger and stouter than the rest, which are about equal in thickness, gradually tapering to the extremity; second quite short; third long- est; the remainder unequal. Eyes subpyriform, subglo- bose, crowded against the first swollen joint of antennas. Maxillary palpi long and slender; first two joints equal, smallest; third fully equal in length to first and second together ; fourth three-fourths as long as third ; fifth nearly as long as third and fourth together, somewhat curved, swollen towards extremity, split on the under side almost its entire length. Sides of the thoracic nota broad, mostly concealing the epimera ; wings wanting ; legs rather long ; coxae carinated externally, the third pair but slightly, the JOURNAL B. S. N. H. 55 NOVEMBER, 1862. 434 Materials for a Monograph first pair having the carina elevated into a sharp, the sec- ond into a dull, point at the middle ; first two pair of femora mostly wanting spines ; hind femora thick and heavy, turned inward at the base, channelled beneath. Ovipositor generally rather long, nearly straight, but a little concave above, rounded off somewhat abruptly at the extremity to the sharp, upturned point. This genus differs from Rhapidophora in the much shorter legs, in the comparative length of the joints of the maxillary palpi, in wanting the terminal spines of the first two pair of femora, and the unusual development of the terminal spines of posterior tibiae, as also those upon the first tarsal joints, in the non-compressed joints of the tarsi, and the shortness of the cerci. *1. C. MACULATUS. Ephippigera maculata, Say Mss., and Harr. Cat. Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) Raphidophora maculata, Harr., Report, 1st ed. ; 126. (1841.) Phalangopsis maculata, Harr., Report, 3d ed. ; 155, fig. 73. (1862.) Phalangopsis lapidicola, Burm., teste Erichson, Archiv. f. Nat. ; 9.227, (see No. 3.) (1843.) Raphidophora lapidicola^ (pars) Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. ; VIII. 7. (1861.) (Not Phalangopsis lapidicola^ Burm.) This species has the posterior tibiae of the male waved at the base in mature individuals, which is true of this species only. Mass., (H. Coll., Agassiz, Shurtleff, Sanborn, S. H. S.) Vermont, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) Norway, Maine, (Verrill.) Cape Elizabeth, Maine, (Morse.) Anticosti, Gulf of St. Lawrence, (Verrill.) *2. C. BREVIPES, nov. sp. A species very closely allied to the preceding, but of a of the North American Orthoptera. 435 smaller size, and differing from it in its markings and pro- portions. It is of a pale : dull, brown color, very profusely spotted with dirty white spots, not so large or so fre- quently confluent as in C. maculatus, except near the ex- tremity of the hind femora, where they nearly form an annulation. The mottling of the pronotum is somewhat different than in C. maculatus ; the hind legs are propor- tionably shorter, as is also the ovipositor, the spines of whose inner valves are duller. Length scarcely more than half an inch ; average length of hind femora, .44 inch ; average length of ovipositor, .25 inch; 2 6 9. Grand Manan Is., Maine, (Verrill.) 3. C. LAPIDICOLUS. Phalangopsis lapidicola^ Burm., Handb. d. Ent. ; II. 723. (1838.) Eaphidophora lapidicola, Burm., Germ. Zeitsch. f. Ent. ; II. 72. (1840.) " (pars) Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. ; VIII. 7. (1861.) This species is very closely allied to C. maculatus^ differ- ing from it in style of mottling of the upper surface, and in that the males do not have the posterior tibiae waved. Since there are two species, (this and the following,) which both correspond to the description of Burmeister's lapidicola, I have chosen to apply his name to that one, of which a specimen is to be found in the Cam- bridge Museum, labelled thus by Mr. Haldeman some years since. I had not seen it or any southern species previous to the publication of my paper on Raphidophora. 4 $ 3 9. Maryland, (Uhler.) Pennsylvania, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) Georgia, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) 4. C. UHLERI, nov. sp. This species also is closely allied to all the preceding, 436 Materials for a Monograph but especially to C. lapidicolus, from which, however, it differs in its markings more than C. lapidicolus does from C. maculatus. The ground-color is reddish brown, and the spots which make up the mottling are distributed more regularly than in the preceding. It differs from it further in the greater length of the antennae, and in the presence of spines upon the under side of the hind femora ; these are spined both upon the inner and outer edge, those of the inner edge being minute, regularly arranged, and of equal size, while those of the outer edge to the number of 5-8 only, are much larger, longer, of unequal length, and irregularly arranged. As the only female I have seen wants the hind femora, I cannot tell whether the males and females differ in the character of these spines as is the case in some species. The hind legs of this species are proportionally longer than in any previously mentioned. Average length of body .65 inches ; average length hind femora .70 inches ; length of antennae about l inches ; length of ovipositor .35. 3^19. Maryland, (Uhler.) 5. C. SCABRIPES. Phalangopsis scabripes, Hald., Proc. Ac. Nat. Sc. Phil. ; VI. 364. (1853.) Raphidophora scabripes, Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist.; VIII. 7. (1861.) This is the only described species of the genus which I have not seen. The darker portions of the hind femora of all the species have scabrous surfaces. Alabama, (teste Haldeman.) 6. C. DIVERGENS, HOV. Sp. A species recalling C. lapidicola by its coloration and markings, which in general appearance it much resembles, but from which, as from all others I know, it may be dis- tinguished by the peculiar disposition of the spines upon the posterior tibiae, which, in addition to the row of min- of the North American Orthoptera. 437 ute crowded spines directed downward which all have upon either edge of the under-side, have also five spines of a peculiar character placed in each of these rows ; they are quite long, placed at regular distances from one another, from the tip of the tibiae to near its base, those upon either row alternating with one another, and directed in almost exactly opposite directions ; they do not point backwards at the same angle with the others, but are turned outwards nearly at right angles to the tibise ; the tibiae of the other legs also partake of this character to some extent ; in this species the spines of the posterior femora are altogether wanting in the female, while the male has spines similar to those of C. Uhleri. Antennae quite long ; hind femora in male stouter than in female. Length of body, .45-.60 in.; hind femora, .25-.30 in. ; antennae, 1.5-2 inches. 1 < 2 9. Nebraska, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) 7. C. LATENS, nov. sp. Pale yellowish brown, with darker streaks upon the hind femora and two broad bands of dark reddish brown along the whole dorsum, extending half-way down the sides, dotted irregularly with brownish yellow spots most profusely on the abdomen, and separated from one an- other by a narrow, irregular band of the same color ; head above, reddish brown ; below, yellowish brown ; tips of the femora dark ; no spines upon the under-side of the hind femora. The hind femora are thick and stout, and the whole hind leg shorter than in most of the species. The ovipositor is shorter than usual in this species, though not nearly so short as in C. californianus. Length of body, .65 in. ; of hind femora, .5 in. ; of ovipositor, .27 in. 1 9 (antennae broken). Illinois, (Uhler.) 8. C. NIGER, nov. sp. Most nearly allied to C. latens by the shortness of the 438 Materials for a Monograph hind-legs and of the ovipositor. It is, however, wholly of a black color with a reddish tinge, especially about the head, under-surface of body, hind femora, and ovipositor; the spines of the legs are all reddish brown ; there are also some traces of a reddish tinge upon the pronotum, which thus exhibit obsolete vestiges of the peculiar markings of the Ceuthophili hitherto mentioned ; the hind femora are unusually slender though short ; the claws of all the feet are twice as long as ordinarily, and the denticulations of the inner valves of the ovipositor are very slender and long ; the antennae are quite short ; the eyes are more nearly circular and more globose than usual, and do not hug the base of the antennae so closely. Length of body, .6 in.; of hind femora, .4 in.; of ovi- positor, .27 ; of antennae, 1 in. 1 9 . Rock Island, Illinois, (Uhler.) 9. C. CALIFORNIANUS, HOV. Sp. Fuscous, paler beneath and upon the front of the head ; a narrow pale median line ; eyes black ; palpi pale ; antennae light brown. The hind femora are short and thick, and have no spines upon the under-surface ; the claws of all the tarsi are quite long ; the ovipositor is re- markably short, no longer than the cerci ; the denticula- tions of the inner valves are rather prominent but dull. Length of body, .53 in. ; of hind femora, .22 in. ; of ovi- positor, .09 in. 19. San Francisco, Cal. (Mus. Comp. Zool.) I have a species from Texas, apparently more closely allied to this than to any other, though with an ovipositor of ordinary length, but in too mutilated a condition for description. 10. C. STYGIUS. Raphidophora stygia, Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. ; VIII. 9. (1861.) Hickman's Cave, Kentucky, (Hyatt.) of the North American Orthoptera. 439 11. C. AGASSIZII. Raphidophora Agassizii, Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist; VIII. 11. (1861). Gulf of Georgia, Washington Territory, (A. Agassiz.) 12. C. GRACILIPES. Phalangopsis gracilipes, Hald., Proc. Am. Ass. Adv. Sc. ; II. 346. (1850.) Raphidophora gracilipes, Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. ; VIII. 7. (1861.) This has longer legs than any other species, unless it be C. stygia, which it much resembles in style of marking and length of antennae ; this, together with the two pre- ceding species, frequently have little suppressed spines upon the inner edge of the upper posterior half of the hind femora. S. Illinois, (Uhler.) N. York, (Uhler.) Schooley's Mt., New Jersey, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) 3 g. The first eight species of Ceuthophilus mentioned agree together remarkably in the distribution of the markings of the dorsum, as do also the three last among them- selves, while C. californianus and the undescribed Texan species form a third distinct group. HADENCECUS, Nov. gen. (adrje, Body small and slender ; head similar to Ceuthophilus ; antennae, very long and slender, exceeding the length of the body many times ; basal joints much as in Ceuthophi- lus^ except that the second is broader, and the fourth is more than half the length of the third ; eyes as in Ceu- thophilus; maxillary palpi very long and slender ; first joint short ; second fully twice as long as first ; third quite long, fully equalling twice the length of second ; fourth nearly as long as the third, slender at the base, thickened towards the tip ; fifth, longer than third, of a similar form to the fourth, but more incrassated at the tip, compressed lat- 440 Materials for a Monograph erally, slightly curved, and split on the underside only at the tip. Tubercle of the vertex very small, pointed, bilobed. Epimera of the meso- and metathorax not cov- ered by the sides of the meso- and metanotum ; wings wanting ; metasternum with a short sharp spine ; legs re- markably long and slender ; coxae carinated externally, the first pair having the carina elevated in the middle to a point ; femora without spines; hind femora turned inwards and a little swollen at the base, extending over only the basal half; under-surface delicately channelled; the two anterior tibiae are slightly longer than their corresponding femora ; tarsi much compressed laterally ; anal cerci long and slen- der ; ovipositor long and slightly ensiform, rounded off very gradually at the extremity to a delicate point. This genus differs from Rhaphidophora in the propor- tional lengths of the joints of the maxillary palpi, in the want of spines on the first two pair of femora, and the peculiarity of character in those of the posterior tibise and basal tarsal joint, as well as the shape of the latter, in the convexity of the eyes, and in the non-development of spines on the coxae of the mesothoracic legs ; most prob- ably Raphid. palpata, Charp., of Europe, belongs to this genus. 1. H. SUBTERRANEA. Raphidophora subterranea. Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. ; VIII. 8. (1861.) Mammoth Cave, Kentucky, (Hyatt, D. C. Scudder.) TROPIDISCHIA, Nov. gen. (T/DOTUC, to%ia). Head similar to Ceuthophilus ', antennae long and slen- der, about three times the length of the body ; first joint large and stout, considerably longer than broad ; second much smaller but broader than the succeeding ; third long and slender, narrowing anteriorly, the rest unequal ; eyes subovate, very globose, slightly removed from the basal of the North American Orthoptera. 441 joint of antennas; maxillary palpi, long and slender; first and second joints short, the second a little the longer; third more than twice the length of the second ; fourth nearly as long as third ; fifth nearly equal to third and fourth together, a very little curved, swollen at the tip, and split a little way down the under-side ; tubercle of the vertex small, but sharply prominent, deeply bisected ; sides of the thoracic nota shorter than in Hadenoscus^ the meso- and metanotum not extending downwards so far as the pro- notum ; wings wanting ; legs long and slender, especially the hindmost pair ; the coxae have the lower edge pro- duced on the inner side to a small dull spine, and they are also carinated externally, the carinae of the pro- and meso- thorax being produced to a spine as in Ceuthophilus ; the femora and tibiae are four-sided, and have all the edges minutely and closely spined, except the posterior femora ; these are swollen, though not heavily, at the basal portion, which is not turned inwards, as in the two preceding genera, and has the rectangular spinous character of the other femora upon the terminal half, and even affecting the swollen portion ; the under-surface is deeply and nar- rowly channelled ; the two anterior tibiae are somewhat longer than their corresponding femora ; there are no heavy spines upon any portion of the legs except upon the extremity of the hind tibiae where there is a pair of moderately long ones ; tarsi much compressed laterally ; anal cerci blunt, channelled interiorly. This genus differs from Raphidophora in the character of its maxillary palpi, the absence of any peculiar develop- ment of spines upon the legs, in the shape of the joints of the tarsi, and the globosity of the eyes. 1. T. XANTHOSTOMA. Raphidophora, xanthostoma, Scudd., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. : VIII. 12. (1861.) Crescent City, Cal. (A. Agassiz.) JOURNAL B. S. N. H. 66 NOVEMBER, 1862. 442 Materials for a Monograph UDEOPSYLLA, Nov. gen. (oiJd This genus is to be placed between Ceuthophilus and Daihinia. The body is heavier and stouter than in Ceu- thophilus^ with a larger head; the form of the body is that of Ceuthophilus; antennaB as in Daihinia; first joint larger and stouter than the rest, as broad as long, com- pressed anteriorly ; third joint twice as long as second ; remainder unequal ; eyes small, subpyriform, docked on the antennal border, globose; maxillary palpi rather long; first and second joints equal and small ; third, more than equal to the preceding together ; fourth, little more than half as long as third ; fifth, a little longer than third, some- what curved, split along the whole under side ; as in Ceu- thophilus the pro- meso- and metanota nearly conceal the epimera of the thoracic segments ; coxae differing but slightly from Ceuthophilus ; hind femora very heavy, thick, and especially broad, but not so much so as in Dai- hinia^ where, as in this genus, the whole limb is swollen, and not the basal portion only, as in the preceding genera ; in the males the hind femora are spined beneath ; the fore and middle femora are shorter and heavier here and in Daihinia than in Ceuthophilus ; tarsi, with the first and fourth joints equal and longest ; second and third equal and small, the second overlapping the third above ; t^^-^ ^ ne ovipositor is rather short, thick at base, slen- Fig. 2. der at apical half, terminating much as in Ceu- thophilus. This genus differs from Daihinia in the longer, more slender, less robust, and less spinous legs, in the some- what more slender body and smaller head, in the shorter maxillary palpi, and in the structure of the tarsal joints. See figs. 2, 3. 1. U. ROBUSTA. Phalangopsis (Daihinia) robustus, Hald., Proc. Am. Ass. Adv. Sc.; 11.346. (1850.) of the North American Orthoptera. 443 Platte River above Fort Laramie, Nebraska, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) 2^29. I have examined Haldeman's types. 2. U. NIGRA, nov. sp. (Fig. 2.) Shining black, with a faintly indicated, narrow, reddish dorsal line, a reddish tinge on the front of the face, the basal half of the inner surface of hind femora and the ter- minal half of the ovipositor, reddish. The hind femora of the male have, upon either edge of the under-surface, but especially on the inner, short but heavy spines, not crowded ; the hind tibiae are furnished on either edge of the upper surface with four or five opposite, long, and slen- der spines, between each two of which are placed three or four suppressed spines ; there is a single row of short spines upon the under-surface, which become double to- wards the tip ; the inner valves of the ovipositor have five teeth, growing longer and more curved towards the tip, where they are very long and slender. Length of body, .8-.9 in. ; of hind femora 9 .56 in. ; $ .68 in. ; of ovipositor, .33 in. ; of antennae, about an inch. 1 $ 1 9. Red River of the North, (Kennicott.) Minnesota, (S. H. S.) DAIHINIA, HALDEMAN. In this genus, while the tarsi of the mesothoracic legs are as they appear in allied genera, the tarsal joints of the anterior and posterior pair are only three in num- ber, the first and last being of nearly equal a length, with a single small joint between them, a very interesting exception to the almost univer- ^ < ~~ sal rule among the Locustarice. (See Fig. 3, Fig. 3. a.b.) 1. D. BREVIPES, Hald., Proc. Am. Ass. Adv. Sc. ; II. 346. (Fig. 3.) (1850.) D. brevipes, Girard, Orthop. in Marcy's Expl. Red River of Louisiana ; 246. Zool. PI. XV. figs. 9-13, (1854.) 444 Materials for a Monograph Platte River above Fort Laramie, Nebraska, (Mus. Com p. Zool.) 2 , 1 9. I have examined Haldeman's types. CYRTOPHYLLUS, BUKMEISTEK. * 1. C. CONCAVUS. Pterophylla concava, Say Mss. and Harr., Enc. Am.; VIII. 42. (1831.) " Harr., Cat, Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) Platyphyllum concavum, Harr., Report, 3d ed. ; 1 58, fig. 74. (1862.) Platyphyllum perspicillatum^ Serv. teste Erich son, Archiv- f. Nat. ; IX. 227. (see No. 2.) (1843.) " Uhl. in Harr., Report, 3d ed. ; 158. (1862.) (Not Locusta perspicillala, Fabr.) Mass., (H. Coll., Agassiz.) Conn., (Norton.) N. Y., (Edwards, Akhurst.) 2. C. PERSPICILLATUS, Burm., Handb. d. Ent. ; II. 697. (1838.) Locusta perspicillata, Fabr., Spec. Ins. ; I. 357. (1781.) Fabr., Mant. Ins. ; 1.233. (1787.) Fabr., Ent. Syst. ; II. 36. (1793.) " " Stoll, Spectres, etc. ; PI. VII. a. fig. 23. (1813.) Platyphyllum perspicillatum^ Serv., Hist. Nat. d. Orth. ; 445. (1839.) This species differs from the northern one in its shorter, but equally broad wing covers, in the slightly broader so- norous apparatus of the male, and in the more robust legs. i $. Texas, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) PHYLLOPTERA, SERVILLE. * 1. P. OBLONGIFOLIA, Burm., Handb. d. Ent. ; II. 693. (1838.) of the North American Orthoptera. 445 Locusta oblongifolia, De Geer, Mem.; III. 445. PL 38, fig. 2. (1773.) Gryllus oblongifolius, Harr., Cat. Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) Phylloptera oblongifolia^ Harr., Report, 3d ed. ; 159. (omitting figure) (1862.) Mass., (H. Coll., Agassiz, S. H. S.) 3 Westwood in Drury, 111. ; I. 121. PI. 49, fig. 2. (1837.) (Not Gryllus tartaricu's^ Linn., &c.) N. Carolina, (H. Coll.) Southern States, (Mus. Comp. * According to Westwood in his edition of Drury ; the only copies of the old edition of Drury, which I have seen, have no appendix in any volume. of the North American Orthoptera. 467 Zool.) Florida, (Norton.) Alabama, (H. Coll.) Texas, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) S. Illinois, (Thomas.) 3. A. OBSCURUM, Burm., Handb. d. Ent; 11.632. (1838.) Gryllus obscurus, Fabr., Syst. Ent. Suppl. ; 194. (1798.) This species has much stouter legs than the others. Texas, (Mus. Comp. Zool., Uhler.) (" The obscurum ? F. of H. Cat. is not in cabinet of T. W. H." Harris Mss.) * 4. A. RUBIGINOSUM, Harris Mss. " Light rust-red ; face with four elevated lines, the two lateral ones not so distinct as in A. alutaceum; thorax with a very distinct ridge along the middle ; wing-covers opaque, rather paler on the overlapping portion than else- where, with a projection on the outer margin near the .shoulder; wings transparent and glassy, slightly reddish towards the tip and netted with blackish veins ; hindmost thighs reddish within and without, the whitish part bound- ed on both sides by a row of distant black dots, and crossed like a herring-bone with reddish lines ; knees of the same legs with a curved black line on each side, spines of the shins white tipped with black. Length, If in. ; expanse of wings, nearly 3 inches. So. Carolina, from Mr. Nuttall and Dr. Holbrook." Harris Mss. Dr. Harris does not mention the faint dark spots on the wing-covers, similar in disposition to those on A. alu~ taceum; there is some variation in the elevation of the medial carina of the pronotum, some individuals showing it but indistinctly. Cape Cod, (Sanborn, S. H. S.) Conn., (Norton.) South- ern States, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) Alabama, (H. Coll.) So. Carolina, (H. Coll.) . (EDIPODA, LATREILLE. I have here included all the species which would be embraced in the old genus (Edipoda of Latreille ; it is 468 Materials for a Monograph easy to see that it should be divided, 'and especially that CE. Carolina, Burm., and (E. sordida, Burm., should each be separated from it, but the desire of having fuller ma- terial before attempting such a task prevents my under- taking it at present. * 1. CE. CAROLINA, Burm., Handb. d. Ent. ; II. 643. (1838.) (E. Carolina, Serv., Hist. Nat. d. Orth. ; 722. (1839.) Uhl. in Harr., Report, 3d ed. ; 176. (1862.) Locusta caroliniana etc. Catesby, Nat. Hist, of N. Car. ; II. 89. Tab. 89. (1743.) Gryllus (Locusta) carolinus, Linn., Syst. Nat. ; II. 701. (1767.) " " " Stoll, Spectres, &c. PI. XVIII. b. fig. 68. (1813.) Gryllus carolinus, Fabr., Syst. Ent. ; 291. (1775.) Spec. Ins.; I. 368. (1781.) Mant. Ins. ; I. 238. (1787.) Ent. Syst; II. 58. (1743.) Acridium carolinum, De Geer, Mem. ; III. 491. PI. 41, figs. 2, 3. (1773.) " Oliv., Enc. Meth. ; IV. 225. (1791.) Acridium carolinianum, Pal. de Beauv., Ins.; 147. PI. IV, fig. 6. (1805.) Locusta Carolina, Harr., Cat. Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) " Harr., Report, 3d ed.; 176. PI. 3, fig. 3. (1862.) Mass., (H. Coll., Miss Edmands, Shurtleff, Agassiz, San- born, S. H. S.) Maine, (Packard.) Conn., (H. Coll., Nor- ton.) * 2. CE. PHOENICOPTERA, Germ, in Burm., Handb. d. Ent. ; II. 643. (1838.) " " Germ., teste Erichson, Archiv. f. Nat. IX. 229. (1843.) (Edipoda obliterata, Germ, in Burm., Handb. d. Ent.; II. 643. (1838.) of the North American Orthoptera. 469 Locusta apiculata, Say Mss., and Harr., Cat. Ins. Mass. ; 56. (1835.) Locusta corallina, Harr., Report, 3d ed. ; 176. (1862.) Mass., (H. Coll., Shurtleff, Sanborn, S. H. S.) Maine, (Packard.) Conn., (Norton.) 3. CE. DISCOIDEA, Serv., Hist. Nat. d. Orth.; 724. (1835.) Acridium tuberculatunij Pal. de Beauv., Ins. ; 145. PL IV, fig. 1. (1805.) (Not Gryllus tuber culatus, Fabr.) N. Carolina, (H. Coll.) Southern States, (Mus. Comp. Zool.) * 4. CE. RUGOSA, nov. sp. This species is closely allied to CE. discoidea. The head and thorax are dark brown ; two yellowish bands run from behind the eye backwards and inwards, nearly or quite meeting one another a little in advance of the middle of the pronotum, where they diverge and strike the hinder edge of the pronotum at the outer angles ; there are two yellow- ish spots, one below the other, on the sides of the pronotum ; the wing-covers are marked much as in (E. discoidea, but the dark blotches are larger and fully as abundant, gener- ally occupying the larger portion of the wing, so that it might better be described as very dark brown with light blotches ; the tip of the wing-cover is pellucid, nearly free of spots ; the wings are as in (E. discoidea, with the basal color pale-yellowish instead of red, and the apical portion less dusky than there. Length of body, $ 1.1 in., 9 1.4 in. ; expanse of wings,