ASTRONOMY, AS IT IS KNOWN AT THE PRESENT DAY AN ACCOUNT OF THE NATURE AND USE OF ASTRONOMICAL INSTRUMENTS, THE MANNER OF CALCULATING THE NOTES OF THE CALENDAR, THE DISTANCES AND MAGNITUDES OF THE PLANETS, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER USEFUL AND INTERESTING CALCULATIONS IN ASTRONOMY. BY GEO. G. CAREY, LECTURER ON NATURAL PHILOSOPHY, CHEMISTRY, ASTRONOMY, &c. Uoutron: PRINTED BY AND FOR WILLIAM COLE, 10, NEWGATE-STREET. 1826". ','; >"* ''V^'s* -; /. mwreir* c Next to the Sun, the Moon is the most remarkable of all the heavenly bodies, and is particularly distinguished by the periodical changes to which her figure and Hght are subject. Among the ancients, Luna > , or the Moon, was an object of very great respect. By the Hebrews she was more regarded than the Sun : and it appears they regulated their time by her motions and appearances. The new moon, or first day of every month, was observed as a festival among them, which was celebrated with sound of trumpets, entertainments, and sacrifices. In the Bible, the Moon is mentioned under several names, as the Queen of Heaven, the Goddess of the Zidonians, and the abomination of the Zido- nians, because she was worshipped by the inhabitants of Zidon or Sidon. The ancient bards and poets have also celebrated the praises of the Moon under various appellations; as Cynthia, Cyllene, Phoebe, Silver Queen of Night, Queen of the Silver Bow, &c. Sister of Phoebus, gentle queea, Of aspect mild and ray serene ; Whose friendly beams by night appear, The lonely traveller to cheer ! The Moon is not a primary planet, but a secondary or satellite, which revolves round the earth, and accompanies it in its annual revolution round the sun. The mean time of a revolution of the Moon round the earth, or the time between two successive conjunc- tions, is 29 days, 12 hours, 44 minutes ; but the time she takes to 54 PHASES OF THE MOON. perform a revolution round her orbit, is only 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes. The former of these periods is called the Synodical, and the latter the Periodical revolution. The difference between these periods is occasioned by the motion of the earth in the ecliptic ; for while the Moon is going round the earth, the earth advances about 29 in the ecliptic, which is nearly 1 per day ; and, therefore, the Moon must advance 29 more than a complete revolution round her orbit, before she can overtake the earth, or be again in conjunction with the sun, which will require 2d. 5h., her daily motion being about 13 degrees. Of all the celestial bodies, the Moon is the nearest to the earth, her mean distance being only 240,000 miles, which is scarcely a four hundred part of the sun's distance from the earth ; but her apparent size is nearly equal to that of the sun, she must therefore be a very small body compared with the sun. Her diameter is only about 2161 miles ; and, therefore the earth is about 48^ times greater ; but the density of the Moon is said to be to that of the earth as 5 to 4, consequently the quantity of matter contained in the earth is only about 39 times that contained in the Moon. Although the Moon moves over a very considerable portion of her orbit in the course of a day, yet on account of its smallness her hourly motion is only about 2290 miles, which is only about 3 oth part of the space passed over by the earth in the same time. But in ail her motions, the Moon is subject to great irregularities, which arise from the eccentricity of her orbit, and her proximity to the earth. The eccentricity of her orbit, as determined from the latest and most accurate observations, is 12,960 miles, or nearly ,gth part of her mean distance ; of course she is about jth part nearer the earth on some occasions than at others. PHASES OF THE MOON. By Thy command the Moon, as daylight fades, Lifts her broad circle in the deep'ning shades ; Arrayed in glory, and enthroned in light, She breaks the solemn terrors of the night ; Sweetly inconstant in her varying flame She changes still, another yet the same ! Now in decrease by slow degrees she shrouds, Her fading lustre in a vale of clouds ; Now of increase, her gathering beams display A blaze of light, and give a paler day. Ten thousand stars adorn her glittering train, Fall when she falls, and rise with her again. BROOME. ' Although the phases of the Moon are among the most frequently observed phenomena of the heavens, yet they are also among the most wonderful. But on account of the frequency and regularity of the changes in the appearances and situation of this beautiful object, the cause of these phenomena are perhaps less thought of by ordinary observers, than if they were less frequent. The Moon being an PHASES OF THE MOON. 55 opaque spherical body, which appears luminous only in consequence of reflecting the light of the sun, can only have that side illuminated which is at any time turned towards the sun, the other side remaining in darkness; and as that part of her can only be seen which is turned towards the earth, it is evident that we must perceive different portions of her illuminated, according to her various positions with respect to the earth and sun. At the time of conjunction, or when the Moon is between the earth and the sun, she is then invisible on the earth, because her enlightened side is then turned towards the sun, and her dark side towards the earth. In a short time after the conjunction, she appears like a fine crescent to the eastward of the sun a little after he sets, as represented by the following figure. This crescent begins to fill up, and the illuminated part to increase, as she advances in her orbit ; and when she has performed a fourth part of a revolution, she appears to be half illuminated, and is then said to be in her first quarter. After describing the second quadrant of her orbit, she is then opposite to the sun, and shines with a round illuminated disc, which is called full moon.* Her appearance at this time is very accurately represented by the following figure. * At the time of full Moon, the Moon appears to be as large as the sun ; for the angle under which the Moon appears when viewed from the earth, is the same as the angle under which the sun appears, and therefore the Moon may hide the sun's whole disc from us, as she sometimes does in solar eclipses, which see. CHASES OF THE MOON. It is necessary, however, to remark, that the Moon does not appear perfectly round when she is full in the highest or lowest part of her orbit ; because we have not a full view of her enlightened side at that time. "When full in the highest part of her orbit, a small deficiency appears on her lower edge ; and the contrary, when full in the lowest part of her orbit. After the full she begins to decrease gradually as she moves through the other half of her orbit ; and when the eastern half of her only is enlightened, she is said to be in her third quarter, and has the following appearance : thence she continues to decrease until she again disappears at the conjunction, as before.* * These various phases may be satisfactorily and pleasantly illustrated, by placing a lighted candle on a table to represent the sun, and a small ball at some distance from it to represent the earth, and then carrying a smaller ball round it, to represent the moon revolving round the earth. PHASES OF THE MOON. Between the third quarter and change, the Moon is frequently visible in the forenoon, even when the sun shines ; and then she affords us an opportunity of seeing a very agreeable appearance, wherever we find a globular stone above the level of the eye, as sup- pose on the top of a gate. For, if the sun shines on the stone, and we place ourselves so as the upper part of the stone may just seem to touch the point of the Moon's lowermost horn, we shall then see the enlightened part of the stone exactly of the same shape with the Moon ; horned as she is, and inclined the same way to the horizon. The reason is plain ; for the sun enlightens the stone the same way as he does the Moon : and both being globes, when we put ourselves into the above situation, the Moon and stone have the same position to our eyes ; and therefore we must see as much of the illuminated part of the one as of the other. The position of the Moon's cusps, or a right line touching the points of her horns, is very differently inclined to the horizon at different hours of the same days of her age. Sometimes she stands, as it were, upright on her lower horn, and then such a line is perpen- dicular to the horizon ; when this happens, she is in what the astronomers call the Nonagesimal Degree ; which is the highest point of the ecliptic above the horizon at that time, and is 90 degrees from both sides of the horizon where it is then cut by the ecliptic. But this never happens when the Moon is on the meridian, except when she is at the very beginning of Cancer or Capricorn. The inclination of that part of the ecliptic to the horizon in which the Moon is at any time when horned, may be known by the position of her horns ; for a right line touching their points is perpendicular to the ecliptic. And as the angle which the Moon's orbit makes with 58 MOTIONS OF THE MOON. the ecliptic can never raise her above, nor depress her below, the ecliptic, more than two minutes of a degree, as seen from the sun, it can have no sensible effect upon the position of her horns. There- fore, if a quadrant be held up, so as one of its edges may seem to touch the Moon's horns, the graduated side being kept toward the eye, and as far from the eye as it can be conveniently held, the arc between the plumb-line and that edge of the quadrant which seems to touch the Moon's horns, will shew the inclination of that part of the ecliptic to the horizon. And the arc between the other edge of the quadrant and plumb-line, will shew the inclination of a line, touching the Moon's horns, to the horizon. These various phases plainly demonstrate that the Moon does not shine by any light of her own ; for if she did, being globular, she would always present a fully illuminated disc like the sun. That the Moon is an opaque body, is not only proved from her phases, but also by the occultation of stars, for her body often comes between the earth and a star, and while she is passing it, the star is hid from our view. MOTIONS OP THE MOON. The neighbouring moon her monthly round Still ending, still renewing, through mid heaven, With borrowed light her countenance triform ;* Hence fills and empties to enlighten th* earth, And in her pale dominion checks the night. MILTON. It has already been remarked, that the motions of the Moon are very irregular. The only equable motion she has, is her revolution on her axis, which is completed in the space of a month, or the time in which she moves round the earth. This has been determined by the important and curious circumstance, that she always presents the same face to the earth, at least with very little variation. But as her motion in her orbit is alternately accellerated and retarded, while that on her axis is uniform, small segments on the east and west sides alternately appear and disappear. This occasions an apparent vibration of the Moon backwards and forwards, which is called her libration in longitude. A little more of her disc is also seen towards one pole, and some- times towards the other, which occasions another wavering or vacil- lating kind of motion, called the libration in latitude. This shows that the axis of the Moon is not exactly, though nearly, perpendicular to the plane of her orbit ; for if the axis of the Moon were exactly perpendicular to the plane of her orbit, or if her equator coincided with that plane, we should perceive no other libration than that in longitude. When the place of the Moon is observed every night, it is found * Increasing with horns towards the east ; decreasing with horns towards the west ; and at the full. OF THE HARVEST MOON. 59 that the orbit in which she performs her revolutions round the earth, is inclined to the ecliptic at an angle of 5 9' at a mean rate ; this angle is not only subject to some variation, but the very orbit itself is changeable, and does not always preserve the same form: for though it is elliptical, or nearly so, with the earth in one of the foci, yet its eccentricity is subject to some variation, being greater when the line of the apsides coincides with that of the syzygies, and least when &ese lines are at right angles to each other. But the eccen- tricity always very considerable, and, therefore, the motion of the Moon is very unequal, for like all other planets, it is quickest in perigee and slowest in apogee. At a mean rate she advances, in her orbit, 13 10' per day, and comes to the meridian about 48 minutes later every day. As the Moon's axis is nearly perpendicu- lar to the plane of the ecliptic, she can scarcely have any change of seasons. But what is still more remarkable, one half of the Moon has no darkness at all, while the other half has two weeks of light and darkness alternately. For the earth reflects the light of the Sun to the Moon, in the same manner as the Moon does to the earth ; therefore, at the time of conjunction, or new Moon, one half of the Moon will be enlightened by the Sun, and the other half by the earth : and at the time of opposition, or full Moon, one half of the Moon will be enlightened by the Sun, but the other half will be in darkness. The earth also exhibits similar phases to the Moon to what she does to the earth, but in a reverse order, for when the Moon is full, the earth is invisible to the Moon; and when the Moon is new, the earth will appear to be full to the Moon, and so on. It has been already mentioned, that the Moon always presents the same face to the earth, from hence it is inferred, that one half of the Moon can never see the earth at all ; whilst from the middle of the other half it is always seen overhead, turning round almost thirty times as fast as the Moon does. From the circle which limits our view of the Moon, only one half of the earth's side next her is seen, the other half being hid below the horizon of all places on that circle. To the Moon, the earth seems to be the largest body in the uni- verse, for it appears about thirteen times greater than the Moon does to the earth. OF THE HARVEST MOON. IT has long been known that the Moon when full, about the time of harvest, rises for several nights nearly at the time of Sun setting ; but the cause of this remarkable phenomenon has not been so long known. This appearance was observed by the husbandman long before it was noticed by the Astronomer ; and on account of its bene- ficial effects in affording a supply of light immediately after Sun-set, at this important season of the year, it is called the Hawest Moon. In order to conceive the reason of this phenomenon it must be recollected, that the Moon is always opposite the Sun when she is 60 OF THE HARVEST MOON. full, and of course in the opposite sign and degree of the zodiac. Now the Sun is in the signs Virgo and Libra in August and Sep- tember, or the time of harvest ; and therefore the Moon when full, in these months, is in the signs Pisces and Aries. But that part of the ecliptic in which Pisces and Aries is situated makes a much less angle with the horizon of places that have considerable northern latitude, than any other part of the ecliptic, and therefore a greater portion of it rises in any given time than an equal portion at any other part of it. Or, which is the same thing, any given portion of the ecliptic about Pisces and Aries rises in less space of time than an equal portion of it does at any other part. And as the Moon's daily motion in her orbit is about 13, this portion of it will require less time to rise about those signs, than an equal portion at any other part of the ecliptic ; consequently, there will be less difference between the times of the Moon's rising when in this part of her orbit than in any other.* At a mean rate the Moon rises 50 minutes later on any evening than she did the preceding evening ; but when she is full about the beginning of September, or when she is in that part of her orbit which rises with the signs Pisces and Aries, she rises only about 16 or 17 minutes later than on the preceding evening ; consequently, she will seem to rise for a few evenings at the same hour. Although this is the case every time that the Moon is in this part of her orbit ; yet it is little attended to, except when she happens to be full at the time, which can only be in August or September. In some years this phenomenon is much more perceptible than in others, even although the Moon should be full on the same day, or in the same point of her orbit. This is owing to a variation in the angle which the Moon's orbit makes with the horizon of the place where the phenomenon is observed. If the Moon moved exactly in the ecliptic, this angle would always be the same at the same time of the year. But as the Moon's orbit crosses the ecliptic and makes an angle with it of 5 9', the angle formed by the Moon's orbit and the horizon of any place is not exactly the same as that made by the ecliptic and the horizon. Some years it is greater, and others less, even at the same time of the year; for it is subject to considerable variations, owing to the retrograde motion of the moon's nodes.-]- If the ascending node should happen to be in the first degree of Aries, it is evident, that this part of the Moon's orbit will rise with the least possible angle, and, of course, any given portion of it will require less time to rise than an equal portion in any other part of the orbit. The most favourable position of the nodes for producing the most beneficial harvest Moons is, therefore, when the ascending node * It would tend very much to make this phenomenon understood, if a terres- trial globe were at hand, and rectified for the latitude of London, when reading this description. t The nodes, or points where the moon's orbit crosses the ecliptic, move back- ward about 19 in a year, by which means they move round the ecliptic in 18 years 225 days. OF THE HARVEST MOON. 61 is in the first of Aries, and of course the descending in the first of Libra. When the nodes are in these points 13 of the Moon's orbit, about the first of Aries, rises in the space of 16 minutes, in the lati- tude of London, and consequently, when the Moon is in this part of her orbit, the time of her rising will differ only 16 minutes from the time she rose on the preceding evening. When the Moon is in the opposite part of her orbit, or about the signs Virgo and Libra, which make the greatest angle with the horizon at rising, 13 of her orbit will require 1 h. 15' to rise, although it were coincident with the eclip- tic ; and if the nodes be in the points just mentioned, the same por- tion of the orbit will require 1 h. 20' to ascend above the horizon of the same place ; and so much later will the Moon rise every night for several nights when in this part of her orbit. As the Moon is full' in these signs in the months of March and April they may be called vernal full Moons. Those signs of the ecliptic which rise with the greatest angle, set with the least; and those that rise with the least, set with the greatest. Therefore, the vernal full Moons differ as much in their times of rising, every night, as the autumnal, or harvest, Moons differ in the times of their setting ; and they set with as little difference of time as the autumnal ones me, supposing the full Moons to happen in oppo- site points of the Moon's orbit, and the nodes to remain in the same point of the ecliptic. In southern latitudes, the harvest Moons are just as regular as in the northern, because the seasons are contrary ; and those parts of the Moon's orbit about Virgo and Libra, where the vernal full Moons happen in northern latitudes, (and the harvest ones in southern latitudes) rise at as small an angle at the same degree of south lati- tude, as those about Pisces and Aries in north latitude, where the autumnal full Moons take place. At places near the Equator, this phenomenon does not happen ; for every point of the ecliptic, and nearly every point of the Moon's orbit, makes the same angle with the horizon, both at rising and setting, and therefore equal portions of it will rise and set in equal times. As the Moon's nodes make a complete circuit of the ecliptic in 18 years 225 days, it is evident, that when the ascending node is in the first of Aries at any given time, the descending one must be in the same point about 9 years 112 days afterwards ; consequently, there will be a regular interval of about 9j-years between the most bene- ficial and least beneficial harvest Moons. APPARENT SIZE OF THE MOON. It has been already remarked at page 55, that the apparent size of the Moon is nearly equal to that of the sun ; but the apparent size of the Moon is not always the same, for she is often much nearer the earth at one time than another ; hence, it is evident, her apparent magnitude must vary, and that it will be greatest when she is nearegt the earth. (See page 54.) 6 G G2 SPOTS, &C. IN THE MOON. But she appears larger when in the horizon than in the zenith even on the same evening ; and yet it may easily be proved, that she is a s.emi-diameter of the earth, or about 4000 miles, farther from the spec- tator when she is in the horizon than when she is in the zenith, and consequently ought to appear smaller, which will be found to be really the case if accurately measured. This apparent increase of magnitude in the horizontal Moon, must therefore be considered as an optical illusion ; and may be explained upon the well known principle, that the eye in judging of distant objects is guided entirely by the previous knowledge which the mind has acquired of the intervening objects. .Hence arise the erroneous estimates we make of the size of distant objects at sea, of objects below us when viewed from great heights, and of objects highly elevated when viewed from below. Now when the Moon is near the zenith, she is seen precisely in this last situation, of course there is nothing near her, or that can be seen at the same time with which her size can be compared ; but the horizontal Moon may be compared with a number of objects whose magnitude is previously known. That the Moon appears under no greater an angle (or is not larger) in the horizon, than when she is on the meridian, may be proved by the following simple experiment. Take a large sheet of paper and roll it up in the form of a tube, of such width as just to include the whole of the Moon when she rises ; then tie a thread round it to keep it exactly of the same size, and when the Moon comes to the meridian, where she will appear to the naked eye to be much less, look at her again through the same tube, and she will fill it as completely as she did before. When the Moon is full and in the horizon, she appears of an oval form, with her longest diameter parallel to the horizon. This appear- ance is occasioned by the refraction of the atmosphere, which is always greatest at the horizon, consequently the lower limb or edge must be more refracted than the upper edge, and therefore these two edges will appear to be brought nearer each other, or the vertical diameter will appear to be shortened ; and as the horizontal diameter is very little affected by the refraction, she must appear to have some- what of an oval shape. The sun is affected in the same manner when in the horizon. SPOTS, MOUNTAINS, &C. IN THE MOON. Turn'd to the sun direct, her spotted disk Shows mountains rise, umbrageous dales descend, And caverns deep, as optic tube descries. THOMSON. When the Moon is viewed through a good telescope, her surface appears to be diversified with hills and valleys ; but this is most dis- cernable when she is observed a few nights after the change or oppo- sition ; for when she is either horned or gibbous, the edge about the confines of the illuminated part is jagged and uneven. SPOTS, &C. IN THE MOON. 63 Many celebrated astronomers have delineated maps of the face of the Moon ; but the most celebrated are those of Hevelius, Grimaldi, Riccioli, and Cassini ; in which the appearance of the Moon is repre- sented in its different states, from new to full } and from full to new. The plate which we have given at page 56, represents the face of the Moon as viewed by the most powerful telescopes, the light or illuminated parts being elevated tracts, some of which rise into very high mountains, while the dark parts appear to be perfectly smooth and level. This apparent smoothness in the faint parts, naturally led astronomers to conclude that they were immense collections of water; and the names given to them, by some celebrated astronomers, are founded on this supposition. For Hevelius distinguished them by giving them the names of the seas on the earth ; while he distinguished the bright parts by the names of the countries and islands on the earth. But Riccioli and Langreni distinguished both the dark and light spots, by giving them the names of celebrated astronomers and mathematicians, which is now the general manner of distinguishing them. That the spots which are taken for mountains and valleys are really such, is evident from their shadows. For in all situations in which the Moon is seen from the earth, the elevated parts are con- stantly found to cast a triangular shadow in a direction from the sun; and on the contrary, the cavities are always dark on the side next the sun, and illuminated on the opposite side, which is quite con- formable to what we observe of hills and valleys on the earth. And as the tops of these mountains are considerably elevated above the other parts of the surface ; they are often illuminated when they are at a considerable distance from the line which separates the enlightened from the unenlighted part of the disc, and by this means afford us a method of even determining their height. Previous to the time of Dr. Herschel, some of the lunar moun- tains were considered to be double the height of any on the earth ; but by the observations of that celebrated astronomer, their height is considerably reduced. For after measuring many of the most conspicuous prominences, he says, " From these observations I believe it is evident, that the height of the lunar mountains is, in general, overrated; and that when we have excepted a few, the generality do not exceed half a mile in their perpendicular elevation." As the Moon's surface is diversified by mountains and valleys as well as the earth, some modern astronomers say they have disco- vered a still greater similarity ; namely, that some of these are really volcanoes, emitting fire, as those on the earth do. An appearance of this kind was discovered by Don Ulloa in an eclipse of the sun, which happened on the 24th June, 1778. It was a small bright spot like a star, near the margin of the Moon, which he supposed at the time to be a hole or valley, which permitted the sun's light to shine through it. Succeeding observations have, however, led astrono- mers to believe, that appearances of this kind are occasioned by the G 2 64 SPOTS, &C. IN THE MOON. eruption of volcanic fire. Dr. Herschel, in particular, has observed several eruptions of this kind, the last of which he has described in the Philosophical Transactions for 1787, as follows : " On April the 19th, at lOh. 6m. I perceived three volcanoes in different places of the dark part of the new Moon. Two of them are either already nearly extinct, or otherwise in a state of going to break out, which perhaps may be decided next lunation. The third shows an actual eruption of fire or luminous matter : its light is much brighter than the nucleus of the Comet which M. Mechain discovered at Paris on the 10th of this month." The following night the Doctor found it burned with greater violence ; and by measurement he found that the shining or burning matter must be more than three miles in diameter, of an irregular round figure, and very sharply defined about the edges. The other two volcanoes resembled large faint nebulae, which appeared to be gradually brighter towards the middle, but no well defined luminous spot could be discovered in them. Dr. Herschel adds, " the appearance of what I have called the actual fire, or eruption of a volcano, exactly resembled a small piece of burning charcoal, when it is covered by a very thin coat of white ashes, which frequently adhere to it when it has been some time ignited ; and it had a degree of brightness about as strong as that with which a coal would be seen to glow in fair daylight." The appearance which Dr. Herschel here describes so minutely, was also observed at the Royal Observatory of Paris, about six days before, by Dominic Nouet, like a star of the sixth magnitude, the brightness of which occasionally increased by flashes. Other astrono- mers also saw the same thing, for M. de Villeneiive observed it on the 22d of May, 1787. This volcano is situated in the north-east part of the Moon, about 3' from her edge, towards the spot called Helicon. After considering all the circumstances respecting these appearances which have just been mentioned, we must subscribe to Dr. Herschers opinion, that volcanoes exist in the Moon as well as the earth. It has long been a disputed point among astronomers, whether or not the Moon is surrounded by an atmosphere. Those who deny that she is, say that the Moon always appears with the same bright- ness when our atmosphere is clear ; which could not be the case if she were surrounded by an atmosphere like ours, so variable in den- sity, and so often obscured by clouds and vapours. A second argument is, that when the Moon approaches a star, Before she passes between it and the earth, the star neither alters its colour nor its situation, which would be the case if the Moon had an atmosphere, on account of the refraction, which would both alter the colour of the star, and also make it appear to change its place. A third argument is, that as there are no seas or lakes in the Moon, there is, therefore, no atmosphere, as there is no water to be raised up into vapour. But those who contend that the Moon is surrounded by an atmosphere, deny that she always appears of the same bright- ness, even when our atmosphere appears equally clear. Instances of the contrary are mentioned by Hevelius and some other astronomers, SPOTS, &C. IN THE MOON. 65 but it is unnecessary to take any farther notice of them here. In the case of total eclipses of the Moon, it is well known that she exhibits very different appearances, which it is supposed are owing to changes in the state of her atmosphere. It is remarked by Dr. Long, that Newton had shown that the weight of any body on the Moon, is but a third part of the weight of what the same body would be on the earth; from which he concludes that the atmosphere of the Moon is only one-third part as dense as that of the earth, and there- fore it is impossible to produce any sensible refraction on the light of a fixed star which may pass through it. Other astronomers assert that they have observed such a refraction ; and that Jupiter, Saturn, and the fixed stars had their circular figures changed into an elliptical one, on these occasions. But although the moon be surrounded by an atmosphere of the same nature as that which surrounds the earth, and to extend as far from her surface ; yet no such effect as a gradual diminution of the light of a fixed star could be occasioned by it, at least none, that could be observed by a spectator on the earth. For at the height of 44 miles our atmosphere is so rare, that it is incapable of refracting the rays of light, now this height is only the 180th part of the earth's diameter; but as clouds are never observed higher than 4 miles, it therefore follows that the obscure part of our atmosphere is about the 2000th part of the earth's diameter, and if the Moon's apparent diameter be divided by this number, it will give the angle under which the obscure part of her atmosphere will be seen from the earth, which is not quite one second, a space passed over by the Moon in less than two seconds of time. It can, therefore, scarcely be expected that any obscuration of a star could be observed in so short a time, although it do take place. As to the argument against a lunar atmosphere drawn from the conclusion, that there are no seas or lakes in the Moon, it proves nothing, because it is not positively known whether there is any water in the Moon or not. The question of a lunar atmosphere seems to be at last settled by the numerous and accurate observations of the celebrated Astrono- mers Shroeter and Piazzi, who have proved as convincingly as the nature of the subject seems to allow, that the Moon has really an atmosphere, though much less dense than ours, and scarcely exceed- ing in height some of the lunar mountains. It is remarked by Dr. Brewster, " The mountain scenery of the Moon bears a stronger resemblance to the lowering sublimity and 5 terrific ruggedness of the Alpin regions, than to the tamer inequalities of less elevated countries. Huge masses of rock rise at once from the plains, and raise their peaked summits to an immense height in the air, while projecting craggs spring from their rugged flanks, and threatening the vallies below seem to bid defiance to the laws of gravitation. Around the base of these frightful eminences, are strewed numerous loose and unconnected fragments, which time seems to have detached from their parent mass, and when we exa- mine the rents and ravines which accompany the overhanging cliffs, 06 CONSTELLATIONS* OR ASTERISMS. we expect every moment that they are to be torn from their base, and that the process of destructive separation which we ha$ only contemplated in its effects, is about to be exhibited before us in tre- mendous reality. The mountains called the Appennines, which traverse a portion of the Moon's disc from north-east to south-west, rise with a precipitous and craggy front from the level of the Mare Imbnim. In some places their perpendicular elevation is above, four miles ; and though they often descend to a much lower level, they present an inaccessible barrier to the north-east, while on the south- west they sink in gentle declivity to the plains." The caverns which are observed on the Moon's surface, are no less remarkable than the rocks and mountains, some of them being three or four miles deep, and forty in diameter. A high angular ridge of rocks marked with lofty peaks and little cavities, generally en- circles them, an insulated mountain frequently rises in their centre, and sometimes they contain smaller cavities of the same nature with themselves. These hollows are most numerous in the south-west part of the Moon, and it is from this cause that this part of the Moon is more brilliant than any other part of her disc. The moun- tainous ridges which encircle the cavities, reflect the greatest quan- tity of light; and from their lying in every possible direction, they appear, near the time of full Moon, like a number of brilliant radia- tions issuing from the small spot called Tycho. It is difficult to explain, with any degree of probability, the forma- tion of these immense cavities ; it is highly probable, that the earth would assume the same figure, if all the seas and lakes were removed ; and that the lunar cavities are either intended for the reception of water, or that they are the beds of lakes and seas which have for- merly existed in the Moon. The circumstance of there being no water in the Moon, affords a strong proof of the truth of this theory." OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, OR ASTERISMS. A spectator who observes the heavens with a tolerable degree of attention, will soon perceive that by far the greater number of the stars never change their situation with respect to each other. Such stars as always appear to occupy the same situation in the heavens, or the same relative distance from one another, have been called fixed stars ; to distinguish them from the planets, whose situations are constantly changing.* The fixed stars constitute by far the most numerous class of celestial bodies ; for on casting the eye quickly to the heavens in a clear winter evening, they appear to be innumerable. * A planet may be known from a fixed star, by the steadiness of its light ; for a fixed star appears to emit a twinkling light, but a planet gives a mild steady light. CONSTELLATIONS, OR ASTERISMS. 67 The grandeur of such a scene with the perpetual and regular change, which the whole appears to undergo by the daily revolution of the earth on its axis, must have attracted the attention of mankind at a very early period. But previous to attempting to make either regular or accurate observations, on the motions aud relative situations of the various booses which compose this splendid scene, it was necessary to invent some method by which the one might be distinguished from the other. To give a particular name to every star which was visible to the naked eye, was impossible. It therefore became necessary to adopt a more general method of distinguishing them. This was accomplished by portioning out the heavens into imaginary figures, of men, birds, fishes, &c. called Con- stellations or Asterisms. After this, the situation of a star could be known by mentioning its place in the Constellation in which it was situated ; as the bull's eye, the lion's heart, the dog's nose, &c. In what age of the world this arrangement of the stars into constellations took place is not known, but it was certainly antecedent to any authentic record ; so that whether the shepherd or the sage, was em- ployed in their formation, cannot now be ascertained. Homer and Hesiod who lived at least 800 years before the Christian era, men- tion several of the constellations. The Pleids, Hyads, with the northern team, And great Orion's more refulgent beam ; To which, around the axle of the sky, The bear revolving points his golden eye, Still shines exalted in th* ethereal plain, Nor bathes his blazing forehead in the main. POPE'S HOMER. In the book of Job, Arcturus, Orion, and the Pleiades, are twice mentioned. Canst thou the sky's benevolence restrain, And cause the Pleiads to shine in vain ? Or, when Orion sparkles from his sphere, PThaw the cold season, and unbind the year ? Bid Mazzaroth his destined station know, And teach the bright Arcturus where to glow ? The writer of the book of Amos has also mentioned Orion and the seven stars; which plainly shews that the constellations must not only have been invented before his time, but that they must have been of some standing at that period. These signs, which now seem so whimsical and uncouth, were not however the offspring of unsystematic fancy ; they appear to have been intended to signify the state of the earth at the different seasons of the year, particularly the figures of the constellations in the Zodiac, which are supposed by some astronomers to be Egyptian hieroglyphics. Among these there are some that have as it were a common relation to every portion of the globe, while others seem to relate to circumstances or events merely local. Aries, is said to signify that the lambs begin to follow the sheep about the time of the 68 CONSTELLATIONS, OR ASTERISMS. vernal equinox, when the sun enters this sign ; and that the cows bring forth their young about the time he approaches the second con- stellation, Taurus, or the Bull. The third sign now called Gemini, was originally two kids, and signified the time of the goats bringing forth their young, which are usually two at a time, while the former (the sheep and the cow) commonly produce only one. A The fourth sign, Cancer the Crab, an animal that goes sideways and backwards, was placed at the northern tropic, or that point of the ecliptic, where the sun begins to return back again from the north to the southward. The fifth sign, Leo, the Lion, as being a furious animal, was thought to denote the heat and fury of the burn- ing sun after he had left Cancer, and entered the next sign Leo. The sixth sign received the sun at the time of the ripening of corn, and the approach of harvest ; which was aptly expressed by one of the female reapers, with an ear of corn in her hand, namely Virgo, or the Virgin. The next sign, Libra, or the Balance, evidently denotes the equality of days and nights, which take place at that season ; and Scorpio, the next sign in order, denotes the time of gathering in the fruits of the earth, which being generally an unhealthily season, is represented by this venomous animal, extending his long claws, threatening the mischief which is to follow. The fall of the leaf was the season of the ancient hunting ; and for this reason the constella- tion Sagittarius represents a huntsman with his arrows and his club ; the weapons of destruction employed by huntsmen at that time. The reason of the Goat being chosen to mark the farthest south point of the ecliptic, is obvious enough, for when the sun has attained his extreme limit in that direction, he begins to return, and mounts again to the northward, which is very well represented by the goat, an animal that is always found climbing and ascending some mountain as it browses. As the winter has always been considered a wet and uncomfortable season, this was expressed by Aquarius, the figure of a man pouring out water from an urn. The last of the zodiacal con- stellations was Pisces, a couple of fishes tied together, which had been caught, which signified that the severe season was over, and though the flocks did not yet yield their store, yet the seas and rivers were open, and fish might be caught in abundance. These ideas have been beautifully expressed by Chatterton, in the following lines : Ou the earth's orbit see the various signs, Mark where the sun our year completing, shines : First the bright Ram his languid ray improves j Next glaring wat'ry thro' the Bull he moves : The am'rous Twins admit his genial ray ; Now burning, thro' the Crab he takes his way ; The Lion, flaming, bears the solar power ; The Virgin faints beneath the sultry shower. Now \hejust Balance weighs his equal force, The slimy Serpent swelters in his course ; The sable Archer clouds his languid face ; The Goat with tempests urges on his race ; Now in the Water his faint beams appear, And the cold Fishes end the circling year. CONSTELLATIONS, OR ASTERISMS. 69 Although these signs might have served to distinguish the seasons of the year when they were first formed, or employed for that pur- pose, yet this is not altogether the case at the present day. For owing to the retrograde motion of the equinoctial points, the constel- lations of the Zodiac have now so far changed their positions, as to be found more than a sign advanced.* The constellation Aries, for example, is now three or four degrees within the sign Taurus, or the first point of Aries, which used to coincide with the equinoctial point, is now about thirty-four degrees farther advanced ; however, the first point of the sign Aries still continues to be reckoned from the equinoctial point. The signs of the Zodiac must therefore now be distinguished from the constellations, the signs merely being ideal, and serving only to designate the course of the sun in thtf ecliptic, while the constellations continue to signify a group or cluster of stars, designated by some particular name. Besides the constellations in the Zodiac, the catalogue of Ptolomy, (which is the first or earliest on record) enumerate 21 to the north, and 15 to the south of it, making in all 48, but these included only the visible part of the heavens, or such as came under their notice. The number of constellations, however, increased, as the knowledge of the stars became more extensive ; and at the same time more stars were introduced into each constellation, as their positions became known. Such stars as were not included in any of these constellations, were called by the ancients informs or sporades stars ; but modern astrono- mers have now reduced these informs, or unformed stars into new constellations, which have now swelled the number to 95. Of these 12 are in the zodiac, the names of which have already been men- tioned; 37 to the north of it, and 46 to the south of it. The northern constellations are Ursa Major Corona Borealis Aquila Ursa Minor Hercules Antinous Draco Cerberus Delphinus *Cepheus Lyra *Taurus Poniatowski Andromeda Cygnus Equulus Cassiopeia *Vulpecula Sagitta Perseus *Anser Auriga Pegasus Lacerta Stellio *Lynx *Canes Venatici *Camelopardalus *Leo Minor Bootes Serpens *Triangulum *Mons Maenalus Serpentarius Triangulum Minus *Coma Berenices Scutum Sobieski *Musca.f *Cor Caroli * See Precession of the Equinoxes, page 9. t The new constellations are those marked thus (*). 70 POSITION OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, &C. The southern constellations are the following : Cetus *Pavo *Octans Hadleianus Eridanus Corona Australia *Cameleon Phoenix *Grus *Piscis Volans Toucan Piscis Australia *Xiphias Orion *Lepus *Officina Sculptoris Monoceras *Columba Noachi *Hydrus Canis Major *Robur Carol! *Fornax Chemica Apus *Crux *Horologium Hydra Argo Navis *Reticulus RhomboidalU Sextans Uraniae Canis Minor *Praxiteles Crater *Apis Musca *EquuIeus Pictorius Corvus Hirundo *Pyxis Nautica Centaurus *Indus *Machina Pneumatica Lupus *Telescopium *Circinus Ara *Microscopium *Quadra Euclidis.t *Triangulum Australe Though the division of the heavens into the constellations above enumerated, be entirely fanciful, yet it is of great advantage in describing the position of particular stars. The judicious and practi- cal astronomer has therefore always resisted every attempt, either to change their names, or to lay them aside, because better could not be substituted in their place ; and because they keep up the greater correspondence and uniformity between the old astronomy and the new. ON THE POSITION OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, AND PRINCIPAL STARS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE. As there is no particular constellation, or star, in the heavens, so singular in its appearance, or so singularly situated with respect to the rest, as to entitle it to the distinction of being first described, but as the constellation Ursa Major, or the Great Bear, never goes below the horizon of places of considerable northern latitude ; and as it is one of the most conspicuous constellations in the northern hemis- phere, we shall not only begin to describe it first, but endeavour to trace out the others by means of it. In the Great Bear there are seven very conspicuous stars, four of which form a trapezium in the body, and the other three are in the tail of that animal. The two former stars in the trapezium are called the guards, or pointers, because a straight line passing through them points out the pole, The pointer which is nearest the pole star is called Dubhe; the first in the tail next the body, Alioth; and the last in the tail, Benetnach.t Nearly in the direction of the pointers, and about five times the interval between them, reckoning from Dubhe, is Alruccabah, or the Pole Star, situated in the tip of the tail of the constellation Uursa Minor, in which there are also seven stars, forming a figure , f The new constellations are those marked thus (*). $ These seven stars form a figure somewhat resembling a plough : hence it is often called Charles' Wain, or the Plough. POSITION OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, &C. 71 like those in the Great Bear, but both the figure and the stars are considerably less. The Lesser Bear Leads from the pole the lucid band : the stars Which from this constellation, faintly shine Twice twelve in number ; only one beams forth Conspicuous in high splendor, nam'd by Greece The CYNOSURE ; by us the POLAR STAR. EUDOSIA. An imaginary line passing from Dubhe through the star in the oppo- site corner of the trapezium, will nearly intersect Cor Caroli, a single star of the second magnitude, whose distance from the latter star is nearly double that between the two former. A straight line from Alioth passing through Cor Caroli, produced a little farther than the distance between them, will reach Vindemiatrix, the farthest northern star in the constellation Virgo. Between Cor Caroli and Virgo is the constellation Coma Berenices, or Berenice's Hair, so named from its resemblance to hair. Then Berenice's locks first rose so bright, The heavens bespangling with dishevelled light. POPE. A straight line from Benetnach passing through Cor Caroli, an$ extending downwards or towards the horizon about double the dis- tance between these two stars, will reach Deneb, a star of the second magnitude in the constellation Leo, or the Lion, and about 25 degrees to the west of Deneb ; and about 3 degrees lower is Regulus, a star of the first magnitude, in the heart of Leo, and almost in the plane of the ecliptic. To the eastward of Deneb, at the distance of about 35 degrees, ib Arcturus, in the constellation Bootes, called the Waggoner. Wide o'er the spacious regions of the North, Bootes urges on his tardy wain. THOMSON. Bootes with his wain the North unfolds ; The southern gate Orion holds. CLAUDIAN. Under Bootes is the constellation Virgo, in which there is a very bright star, called Spica Virginis, which forms with Deneb and Arcturus a very large equilateral triangle. A little to the south-west of Spica Virginis, is the constellation Corvus, the stars of which form a long trapezium, but none of them exceed the third magnitude. The first star is named Algorab, and is in the lower corner of the trapezium, about 18 degrees from Spica Virginis. A line from Vindemiatrix, the third star in Virgo; through Arcturus, will intersect Alphacca, a star of the second magnitude in the constellation Corona Borealis, or the Northern Crown ; the dis- tance between Alphacca and Arcturus being nearly equal to that between the latter and Vindemiatrix. This constellation is very con- spicuous, the stars in it being arranged in a circular form, somewhat resembling a crown. A line passing from Regulus through Spica Virginis, and extending an equal distance beyond the latter, will 72 POSITION OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, &C. reach Antares, a star of the first magnitude in the constellation Scorpio. Between Scorpio and Virgo is the constellation Libra, containing a number of small stars ; and to the south of Scorpio is the constellation Lupus, or the Wolf, which also contains a number of stars ; but none of them exceed the third or fourth magnitude. Nearly in the line produced from Arcturus, through the Northern Crown, and about twice the distance between them, and beyond Alphacca, is one of the brightest stars in the heavens, called Vega, in the constellation Lyra. In the line joining this star and the guards of Ursa Minor, and about 15 degrees distant from the former, is Rastaban, a star of the third magnitude in the constellation Draco, or the Dragon ; and in the opposite direction from Vega, a little to the east of the line, and about 34 degrees distant, is Altair, a star between the first and second magnitude in the constellation Aquila. The stars Altair, Vega, and Deneb, a star of the second magnitude in the constellation Cygnus, form nearly a right-angled triangle, the right angle being at Vega. About 14 degrees north-east of Altair, is a romboidal figure, formed by four stars in the constellation Delphinus ; and about 35 or 36 degrees east of this figure, is the constellation Pegasus, in which there is a bright star in the neck called Scheat. About 13 degrees south of that is Markab, a star of the second magnitude j 16 degrees to the east of Markab is another star of the second magnitude, in the same constellation ; and nearly 14 degrees east of Scheat is a star of the third magnitude, in the head Andromeda. These four stars form a square, usually called the Square of Pegasus. A line from Scheat through Markab, at the distance of 45 degrees from the latter, will nearly intersect Fomalhaut, a star of the first magnitude in the constellation Pisces Austraulis, or the Southern Fish. Between Markab and Fomalhaut, and about 10 degrees south of the former, is the constellation Pisces. To the west of the line joining the two last mentioned constellations is Aquarius, one of the zodiacal constellations. A line from Deneb in Cygnus, passing through Markab, and dis- tant from it about 41 degrees, will point out the second brightest star in the constellation Cetus : and a line from the rhomboid already mentioned, in Delphenus, through Markab, at the distance of nearly 60 degrees from this last star, will intersect Menkar, a star of the second magnitude in the jaw of Cetus. About 37 degrees north of Menkar is Algol, the second star in the constellation Perseus, which is one of those stars that vary in brightness. At the distance of about 27 degrees from the star in the head of Andromeda, and a little to the south of the line, joining it and Markab, is Almaach, a star of the second magnitude in the southern foot of Andromeda : and about half way between it and Markab, is Mirach, a star of the third magnitude in the girdle of that constellation. A little to the north of the same line, at the distance of about 42 degrees, is Algenib, a star of the second magnitude in the constella- tion Perseus. The three stars, Almaach, Algol, and Algenib, form nearly a right-angled triangle, Algol being at the right angle. POSITION OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, &C. 73 Between Mirach and Menkar, about 17 degrees from the former, is a tolerably bright star of the second magnitude in the constellation Aries, between which and Almaach are the two triangles, and about 10 degrees south-east of the triangles is the small constellation Musca, or the Fly. To the north-east of Menkar, about 26 degrees, and as many south-east of Musca, is Aldebaran, a star of the first magnitude, of a red colour, in the constellation Taurus. This star, with several other small ones called the Hyades, forms a triangle. Between this triangle and Musca, is that well-known cluster of stars called the Pleiades, or Seven Stars, which are situated in the neck of Taurus. A line from Aldebaran through Algol, at the distance of 28 degrees from Algol, will intersect Schedar, a star of the third magnitude in the constellation Cassiopeia. This constellation will easily be known, being composed of five or six stars of nearly the same magnitude, and being always on the opposite side of the pole, with respect to the star Alioth, in Ursa Major. About 22 degrees south-east from Aldebaran, are three stars of the second magnitude, in a straight line, and at equal distances from each other, which form the belt of Orion. Below the belt are a few stars that compose the Sword of Orion, in a beautiful nebulae. Above these are two bright stars, distant from each other about 7| degrees; the farthest west one is called Bellatrix, and the other Betelguese ; and, about as far distant on the other side of the belt is Rigel, a star of the first magnitude; all of these are in the constella- tion Orion, which is one of the most beautiful constellations in the heavens. About half way between Rigel and the north pole is Capella, a star of the first magnitude in the constellation Auriga. A line from Menkar through Rigel, at the distance of 23 degrees from the latter, or from Aldebaran, through the middle star of Orion's belt, and about as far below it as Aldebaran is above it, is Sirius, a star of the first magnitude in the constellation Canis Major.* About 5f degrees west from Sirius is a star between the second and third magnitude, and about 11 degrees farther south than Sirius there are three others in a straight line, all of the third magnitude, and in the same constellation. About 26 degrees to the east of Betelguese, and the same distance north-east from Sirius, is Procyon, a star between the first and second magnitude in Canis Minor. In a line with Rigel and the middle star in the belt of Orion, about 44 degrees from the latter, is Castor, a star between the first and second magni- tude, in the constellation Gemini ; and about 4| degrees south-east of Castor is Pollux, a star between the second and third magnitude, in the same constellation. Pollux may also be known by observing, that it is about 45 degrees distant from Aldebaran, in the line pro- duced, passing through it from Menkar. About half way between Procyon and Regulus is Acubens, a star of the third magnitude, in the sign Cancer. Aline from Alioth through Regulus being pro- duced about 23 degrees, will intersect Alphared, a star of the second * Sirius is the brightest star in the heavens, and is by some astronomers supposed to be nearest the earth. No. 7. H 74 POSITION OF THE CONSTELLATIONS, &C. magnitude in the constellation Hydra; and a line from Procyon through Alphared, produced about 24 degrees beyond Alphared, will intersect Alkes in the constellation Crater. This star may also be known by being on the meridian nearly at the same time with the pointers in the Great Bear. As the constellations and stars now described comprise the greater number of those that can be seen in any part of Great Britain, it is unnecessary to take any notice of the others.* The situation of the principal constellations which appear above the horizon of London, during a night about the middle of Decem- ber, are so beautifully and accurately described in the following extract from the philosophic poem entitled Eudosia, that it cannot but be admired by all lovers of Astronomy : Now let us watch the rising of the stars ; And look where mid December points the hour Most apt for contemplation of the scene. The fourth from noon is pass'd, and half the space Fled to the fifth ; in the meridian view Cepheus, sublime ; the Dragon's tortile spire, Where shines to Britain's great metropolis, The correspondent star ; alike remote This from the heavenly, that the earthly pole, And perfectly coincident in place, The greater Bear is seen ; and Pegasus Tends to the south ; the beauteous Twins emerge from the horizon ; Taurus climbs oblique ; Still higher Aries ; the declining Fish Verge to the southern wave ; and Capricorn Glistens, diminish'd, in the western sky : And, near the goal, with languid ray appears Chiron ; but, nigh to the direct of east, Orion half is risen ; nor prevails The horizon even now to eclipse the pomp Of the proud constellation ; his right side Blazes ; the star, which lightens on the left, Is winning now upon our hemisphere : And near him the vast Whale conspicuous shines. The sixth hour is elaps'd, Orion shows His flaming belt ; the Twins are wholly risen ! Soon Procyon appears ! and now the Crown Of Ariadne rises : Charles, thy star, Though never setting to the horizon, stoops. And of the Crab the far distinguish'd light Emerges. Little later than the seventh, Sirius appears : the ninth the Lion shines ; And in the vertex is Medusa seen. Near the tenth hour from noon Hydra appears Southward ; at mid of night Orion's form Fires the meridian ; but the Whale retired ; The radiant Lyra meets the horizons' bound ; The Virgin form shows her ascendant wing ; * Those who are possessed of a celestial globe, and know how to use it, will, in a few evenings, acquire a knowledge of the principal stars that may be above their horizon at that season ; but the foregoing directions will be found to answer the same purpose, with the assistance either of a globe or map of the heavens. THE LUSTRE AND MAGNITUDE OF THE STARS. 75 Capella in the zenith glows ; an hour Is pass'd; Areturus rises : ere the night ' Has mark'd the second hour from its mid space, Shoots in full beam the great NEWTONIAN Star.* The fourth approaches, when the golden star Of Libra gains the eye : the sails retire Of the resplendent Ship ; her lucid mast Shines eminent. The sixth her fetter'd arm Andromeda discovers ; and the heart Of Scorpio rises ; Hydra fills the west ; Medusa's Head sinks, and Orion bears With difficulty his shoulders unsubmerg'd : Monocerous succeeds. Why should I name The Snake or Serpentarius fully risen ? Or why repeat the wonders which before Engag'd our eye ? The great and smaller Bear, With the Camelopard and varied Lynx ! Or gaze on thee, O Perseus ! thee admire, Aquila ; or the Lyre, which re-ascends ? But, rising eastward, beams the glorious arch Of the pure Galaxy ? And now appears Urania's Sextant, and persuades to leave The starry theatre, and yield to dawn ; For now Aurora's fiery coursers gild The frosty summit of the eastern hills. All this delightful scene revolving earth Produces, visiting the several stars ; While undisturb'd remain the heavenly spheres. EUDOSIA. OF THE LUSTRE AND MAGNITUDE OF THE STARS. One sun by day, by night ten thousand shine ; And light us deep into the DEITY. O how loud They call devotion, genuine growth of night ! Devotion, daughter of Astronomy ! An undevout astronomer is mad. YOUNG. The stars are divided into orders or classes according to their apparent magnitudes. Those that appear largest to the naked eye, have been called stars of the first magnitude ; those that appear next largest, the second magnitude ; and so on to the sixth, which compre- hends the smallest stars that are visible to the naked eye. All those that can only be perceived by the help of a telescope, are called telescopic stars. The stars of each class are not all of the same apparent magnitude. In the first class, or those of the first magnitude, there are scarcely two that appear of the same size. There are also other stars, of intermediate magnitudes, which astronomers cannot refer to any particular class, and therefore they place them between two; but on this subject astronomers differ con- * Spica Virginus, the ear of wheat in the constellation Virgo : The star which crowns the golden sheaf, And wants a name, O glory of the skies ! And shall not justice dignify thy sphere With the great name of NEWTON ? Be at least To me. for ever the Newtonian Star. EUDOSIA. H 2 76 OF THE LUSTRE AND MAGNITUDE OF THE STARS. siderably ; some of them classing a star among those of the first magnitude, while others class it among those of the second, and so on with others. In fact it may be said, that there are almost as many orders of stars as there are stars, on account of the great variations observa- ble in their magnitude, colour, brightness, &c. Whether these varie- ties of appearance are owing to a diversity in their real magnitude, or from their different distances, is impossible to determine ; but it is highly probable that both of these causes contribute to produce these effects. To the naked eye, the stars appear of a sensible magnitude, owing to the glare of light arising from the numberless reflections from the aerial particles, &c. about the eye ; this makes us imagine the stars to be much larger than they would appear, if we saw them only by the few rays which come directly from them, so as to enter our eyes without being intermixed with others. Any person may be sensible of this by looking at a star of the first magnitude through a long nar- row tube, which, though it takes in as much of the heavens as would hold a thousand such stars, scarcely renders that one visible. The stars being so immensely distant from the earth, there seems to be but little probability of ascertaining with certainty the real magnitude of any of them. And as Dr. Herschel has very justly remarked, " that, in the classification of stars into magnitudes, there is either no natural standard, or at least none that can be satisfactory ; and that the astronomers who have thus classed them, have referred their size or lustre to some imaginary standard." The same illustrious astronomer observes, " that the inconveni- ence arising from this unknown, or at least ill-ascertained, standard, to which we are to refer, is such, that now our most careful obser- vations labour under the greatest disadvantage. If any dependence could be placed on the method of magnitudes, it would follow, that many of the stars had undergone a change in their lustre or apparent magnitude, even since the time of Dr. Flamstead. Not less than eleven stars, in the constellation Leo, have undergone a change of lustre since his time." This change, Dr. Herschel believes, has arisen from the uncertainty of the standard of magnitudes, and not from any real change in the lustre of the stars : and in order to pre- vent mistakes of this nature to future observers, the Doctor proposes to compare the lustre of any particular star with that of one which is greater, and also one that is less, both of which to be as near the proposed star as possible. This he thinks would answer much better for detecting a change in the lustre of any suspected star than the vague method of magnitudes, which has been hitherto in use among astronomers. As a full display of the Doctor's method would occupy more space than can be allotted to it in this work, those who wish to have more information on the subject, may consult the Phil. Trans, vol. 86. That many real changes in the lustre of stars have taken place, Dr. Herschel acknowledges ; for he says, " If we consider how OF THE LUSTRE AND MAGNITUDE OF THE STARS. 77 little attention has been paid to this subject, and that most of the observations which we have are of a very late date, it will perhaps not appear extraordinary were we to admit the number of alterations that have probably happened to different stars to be 100 ; this, com- pared with the number of stars that have been examined, with a view to ascertain their changes, which we can hardly rate at 3000, will give us a proportion of 1 to 30. But we are certain, that had a num- ber of observers applied themselves to the same subject, many more discoveries might probably have been made of changeable and periodical stars, whose variations are too small to strike a general observer. By observations of this nature," continues this celebrated astronomer. " we are enabled to resolve a problem, not only of great im- portance in itself, but one in which we are all immediately concerned. Who, for instance, would not wish to know what degree of perma- nency we ought to ascribe to the lustre of our sun? Not only the stability of our climates, but the very existence of the whole animal and vegetable creation, are involved in the question. Where can we hope to receive information on this subject, but from astronomical observations ? If the similarity of the stars to our sun be admitted, how necessary does it become to observe the fate of neighbouring suns, in order to guess at that of our own ! That star among the multitude which we have dignified with the name of sun, to-morrow may slowly begin to undergo a gradual decay of brightness, like & in Leo, in Cetus, a in Draco, * in Ursa Major, and many others. It may suddenly increase, like the wonderful star in the back of Cassiopeia's Chair, and the no less remarkable one in the foot of the Serpent; a gradual increase, like & in Gemini, # in Cetus, and many other stars which have been known to increase in lustre. And lastly, it may turn into a periodical one of 25 days, as Algol is of 3 days, * in Cepheus of 5, in Lyre of 6, or as many others are of various periods."* " If by proper attention to this subject," continues the Doctor, " it should be found that all, or many of the stars which we now have reason to suspect to be changeable, are really subject to an alteration in their lustre, it will much lessen the confidence we have hitherto placed on the permanency of the equal emission of light by our sun. Many phenomena in natural history seem to point out some past changes in our climates. Perhaps the easiest way of accounting for them may be to surmise that our sun has been formerly sometimes more and sometimes less bright than it is at present : and that many of the unaccountable varieties which happen in our seasons, such as a general severity or mildness of uncommon winters, or burning * The stars in each constellation are marked or distinguished by the letters of the Greek alphabet; and some remarkable ones have particular names, as Aldebaran, Sirius, Algol, &c. The brightest star in each constellation is marked with the first letter, the next brightest with the second letter, and so on ; but if there should be a greater number of stars in any constellation, than there are letters in the Greek alphabet, the Roman alphabet is then employed, and afterwards the italic. 78 OF THE NUMBER OF THE STARS. sumrters, may possibly meet with an easy solution in the real inequa- lity of the sun's rays." Various hypotheses have been devised to account for the changes and appearances of the stars. Some astronomers have supposed that the periodical stars have vast dark spots, or dark sides, and very slow rotations on their axes, by which means they must disappear when the dark side is turned to the earth. Others are of opinion that the luminous surfaces of these bodies is subject to perpetual change, which sometimes increases their light, and at others extin- guishes it. Some have also ascribed the variation in the light of the stars, to the intesposition of the planets that revolve round them ; but it is not very probable that these planets are sufficiently large to produce such an effect. Several other hypotheses might be mentioned, which have been advanced at different periods to account for these extraordinary changes ; but as they rest upon mere conjecture, and are still more improbable than any of those just mentioned, it is unnecessary to give any account of them. OF THE NUMBER OF THE STARS. Why from yon arch, that infinite of space, ] t With infinite of lucid orbs replete, Which set the living firmament on fire, At the first glance, in such an overwhelm Of wonderful, on man's astonished sight Rushes Omnipotence ? The number of the stars appears to be uncommonly great on first casting the eye to the heavens in a very clear winter evening ; but astronomers have long ago ascertained, that the number of such as are visible to the naked eye in both hemispheres, does not amount to 2000. This may at first appear incredible to some, because at first sight they seem to be innumerable ; but the deception arises from looking upon them hastily, without reducing them into any kind of order. For let any person look steadily for some time upon a large portion of the heavens, and count the number of stars in it, aod he will be surprised to find the number so small. And if the moon be observed for a short space of time, she will be found to pass very few in her way, although there are as many about her path as in any other part of the heavens. Flamstead's Catalogue contains only 3000 stars, and many of these are not visible without a telescope. But although the number may be small when examined with the naked eye, yet when examined with a powerful telescope the number exceeds all computation. For a good telescope directed to almost any part of the heavens, discovers multitudes that are lost to the naked eye. In some places, however, they are crowded together ; and in others there are considerable spaces where no stars can he seen. Tn the small group called the Pleiades, in which 6 or 7 stars OF THE NUMBER OF THE STARS. 79 can only be seen by the naked eye, Dr. Hook discovered 78 stars with a telescope, and F. de Rheita 188. The same astronomer affirms, that he has observed above 2000 stars in the single constel- lation Orion. And Huygens, when looking at the star in the middle of Orion's sword, instead of one, found that there were 12. Galileo found 80 in the space of the belt of Orion's sword, 21 in the nebulous star in his head, and above 500 in another part of him, within the compass of one or two degrees space, and more than 40 in the nebulous star Praesepe. There are also many stars which have the appearance of being single to the naked eye, but when examined with a good telescope, are found to be double, treble, &c. Of these, several have been ob- served by Cassini, Hook, Long, Maskelyne, and some other astronomers ; but Dr. Herschel has been the most successful ob- server of these remarkable objects. Be has already given a cata- logue of above 700 double stars, most of which have never been noticed before by any other person. Among these there are also some stars that are treble, double- double or quadruple, double-treble, and multiple.* So late descried by Herschel's piercing sight, Hang the bright squadrons of the twinkling night : Ten thousand marshall'd stars, or silver zone, Effuse their blended lustres round her throne ; Suns 'call to suns, in lucid clouds conspire, And light exterior skies with golden fire. Resistless rolls th' illimitable sphere, And one great circle forms the unmeasured year. Besides those starry groups, where the individual stars are distinctly visible, there are numbers of small luminous spots, of a cloudy appearance, called Nebulae. Of these a few have been noticed by the ancients ; but since the invention of the telescope, many more have been discovered, particularly by Dr. Herschel, who has given a catalogue of 2500 nebulae. The largest of these nebulse is the Galaxy, or Milky Way, a broad, irregular, luminous zone, which nearly encircles the heavens, and appears to be the nearest of all the nebulae. Nor need we with a prying eye survey The distant skies to find the Milky-Way : It forcibly obtrudes upon our sight. CREECH. From the observations of Dr. Herschel, it appears that this exten- sive portion of the heavens is completely crowded with stars ; for he says, " On applying the telescope to a part of the Via Lactea, (that * This catalogue is contained in the 72d and 75th Vol. of the Transactions of the Royal Society. 80 OF THE NUMBER OF THE STARS. is, the Milky Way) I found that it completely resolved the whole whitish appearance into small stars, which my former telescope had not light enough to effect.* A way there is in heaven's extended plain, Which when the skies are clear is seen below, And mortals, by the name of Milky, know : The ground-work is of stars ; through which the road Lies open to great Jupiter's abode. DRYDEN from OVID. The portion of this extensive tract which it has hitherto been conve- nient for me to observe, is that immediately about the hand and club of Orion. The glorious multitude of stars of all possible sizes that presented themselves here to my view, was truly astonishing ; but as the dazzling brightness of glittering stars may easily mislead us so far as to estimate their number greater than it really is, I endeavoured to ascertain this point, by counting many fields, and computing from a mean of them, what a certain given proportion of the Milky Way might contain. Among many trials of this sort, I found that six fields, promiscuously taken, contained 110, 60, 70, 90, and 74 stars each. I then tried to pick out the most vacant place that was to be found in that neighbourhood, and counted 63 stars. A mean of the first 6 gives 79 stars for each field. Hence, by allowing 15 minutes of a great circle for the diameter of any field of view, we gather, that a field of 15 degrees long, and 2 broad, or the quantity which I have often seen pass through the field of my telescope in one hour's time, could not well contain less than 50,000 stars that were large enough to be distinctly numbered. But, besides these, I sus- pected at least twice as many more, which, for want of light, I could only see now and then, by faint glittering and interrupted glimpses." The Doctor goes on to make some remarks on nebulae and clusters of stars in general, and then observes, " That they are generally arranged in strata, which seems to run on to a great length, some of which I was able to pursue, so as to guess pretty well their form and direction. It is probable enough that they may surround the whole apparent sphere of the heavens not unlike the Milky Way, which undoubtedly is nothing but a stratum of fixed stars. And as this latter immense starry bed is not of equal breadth or lustre in every part, nor runs on in one straight direction, but is curved and even divided into two streams along a very considerable portion of it, we may likewise expect the greatest variety in the strata of other clusters of stars and nebulae. One of these nebulous beds is so rich, that in passing through a section of it, in the time of 36 minutes, I detected no less than 31 nebulae, all distinctly visible on a fine blue sky. Their situation and shape, as well as condition, * The telescope here alluded to was a reflector of 20 feet focal distance, and its aperture 18f g inches. OF THE NUMBER OF THE STARS. 81 seems to denote the greatest variety imaginable. In another stra- tum, or perhaps a different branch of the former, I have seen double and treble nebuloe variously arranged ; large ones with small, seem- ing attendants ; narrow but much extended, lucid nebulae or bright dashes ; some of the shape of a fan, resembling an electric brush, issuing from a lucid point ; others of a cometic shape, with a seem- ing nucleus in the centre ; or like cloudy stars, surrounded with a nebulous atmosphere ; a different sort again contain a nebulosity of the milky kind ; while others shine with a fainter, mottled kind of light, which denotes their being resolvable into stars/' These observations serve to prove the intimate connection between the nebulous and sidereal condition ; and, although in passing from the one to the other, a number of ambiguous objects are to be met with, yet this apparent uncertainty in the construction is only the consequence of the want of an adequate power in our telescopes to shew them of their real form. There is, however, no reason to expect that an increase of light and distinctness in our telescopes would free us altogether from ambiguous objects ; for by improving our power of penetrating into space, and of defining those which at present appear indistinct, we should probably reach so many new objects, that others, of an equally obscure construction, would obtrude themselves, even in greater number, on account of the increased space of the more distant regions in which they were situated. Dr. Herschel is of opinion that there is some operation going on in' the heavens, by which new sidereal bodies are gradually and pro- gressively formed or drawn into clusters or nebulae ; and that these clusters in time become more compressed or condensed, and ulti- mately assume a globular form. The power by which these extra- ordinary operations are performed, Dr. H. calls the clustering power. And he thinks that in time this power will have the effect of com- pletely breaking up the Milky Way, and of converting it into glo- bular insulated clusters. For he says, " Since the stars of the Milky Way are permanently exposed to the action of a power whereby they are irresistibly drawn into groups, we may be certain that from mere clustering stars they will be gradually compressed through successive stages of accumulation, till they come up to what may be called the ripening period of the globular form, and total insulation ; from which it is evident that the Milky Way must be finally broken up, and cease to be a stratum of scattered stars." " From this gradual dissolution of the Milky Way," continues the Doctor, " we may draw a very important conclusion ; for the state into which the incessant action of the clustering power has brought it at present, is a kind of chronometer, that may be used to measure the time of its past and future existence ; and although we do not know the rate of going of this mysterious chronometer, it is nevertheless certain, that, since the breaking up of various parts of the Milky Way affords a proof that it cannot last for ever, it equally d2 O? THE DISTANCE OF THE STARS. bears witness that its past duration cannot be admitted to be infinite.* If we reflect for a moment on the amazing number of stars which the Milky Way contains, and grant that all the other nebulae which the powerful telescopes of Dr. Herschel have enabled him to disco- ver, are composed of distinct individual stars, then may we exclaim with the Psalmist, " The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament sheweth his handy work. OF THE DISTANCE OF THE STARS. How distant some of the nocturnal suns ! So distant says the sage, 'twere not absurd To doubt, if beams set out at Nature's birth, Are yet arrived at this so foreign world ; Though nothing half so rapid as their flight. An eye of awe and wonder let me roll, And roll for ever. Who can satiate sight In such a scene, in such an ocean wide Of deep astonishment? Where depth, heighth, breadth, Are lost in their extremes ; and where to count The thick-sown glories in this field of fire, Perhaps a seraph's computation fails. YOUNG. To find the distance of the fixed stars is a problem which many eminent astronomers have attempted to solve ; but notwithstanding all their skill and exertions, this desirable object has never been satisfactorily accomplished. Various methods have been pursued without success ; and the result of the finest observations has scarcely given us more than a distant approximation. For trigono- metry, by whose powerful assistance the mathematician has boldly ascended to the planetary regions, and measured the diameters and orbits of the various bodies which compose the solar system, for want of a proper base, is here but of little service ; for the whole diameter of the earth's orbit, which is nearly 190 millions of miles, is a mere point when compared with the immense distance of the fixed stars. Now as this base cannot be enlarged, the only chance that remains of solving the problem mathematically, is to endeavour to improve the instruments which are employed in measuring their parallax j for unless this is accurately ascertained, it is impossible to find their real distance. f But the accuracy and nicety of the instruments which have already been employed by the most skilful and assiduous astronomers, in attempts to find the parallax of some of the stars, leave us little hope of this important discovery ever , ' "-" * In Bode's Atlas Coelestis, 157 clusters are given as existing in the Milky Way, to which Dr. Herschel says 68 more must be added, which are to be found in the less rich parts of that surprising region of the heav ens. t See an explanation of this term at page 9. OF THE DISTANCE OF THE STARS. 83 being made. Dr. Bradley assures us, that had the parallax of Y Draconis amounted to a single second, he must have perceived it in the great number of observations he made upon it ; and that it seemed to him, that the annual parallax of this star does not amount to a single second, and consequently that it is above 400,000 times farther from us than the. sun, or 38,000,000,000,000 miles.* But as this is only a bright star of the third magnitude, " it is probable," says Dr. Herschel, " that its parallax is much less than that of a star of theirs* magnitude." Allowing this to be the case, and supposing the parallax of a star to amount to one second, its distance cannot be less than 103,130 times the breadth of the earth's orbit, or 19,594,700,000,000 miles. As these distances are so immensely great, it may amuse as well as assist the mind, in forming a more correct idea of their vastness, to compare them with the velocity of some moving body which may be measured. The swiftest motion of which we have any knowledge, is that of light, which passes from the sun to the earth, or 95 million of miles in 8 minutes 13 seconds, would require more than 6 years to pass over the former of the above distances, or to arrive at the earth from y Draconis : and above 3 years to pass over the latter, or from one of the nearest of the fixed stars. But a cannon-ball, though continu- ing to move at the rate of 20 miles per minute, would be 3 millions 8 hundred thousand years in passing from ? Draconis to the earth, and 1 million 960 thousand years in passing from the nearest fixed star. Sound, which moves at the rate of about 13 miles in a minute, would be 5 million 600 thousand years in traversing the former distance, and 2 million 800 thousand, in passing through the latter. The celebrated astronomer, Huygens, pursued speculations of this kind so far, as to believe it not impossible that there may be stars at such inconceivable distances, that their light has not yet reached the earth since their creation. The late Professor Playfair, in speaking of the fixed stars, says, " As it cannot be doubted that the fixed stars are luminous bodies like the sun, it is probable that they are not nearer to one another than the sun is to the nearest of them. When, therefore, two stars appear like a double star, or very near to one another, the one must be placed far behind the other, but nearly in the same straight line, when seen from the earth. The same must hold, at least in a certain degree, wherever a great number of stars are seen concentrated in a small spot. In the starry Nebulae, such as the Milky Way, which derive their light from the number of small stars, appearing as if in contact with each other, it is plain that the most distant of these must be many thousand times farther off than the nearest, and light must of course require many thousand years to come from them to * Various methods have been proposed and repeatedly attempted, in order to discover the parallax of the stars, by many celebrated astronomers, without suc- cess j but this is a subject which does not belong to a work like the present. 84 OF THE NATURE OF THE FIXED STARS. *4 ' V SI- ' : J. fK, > the earth. The poet has been taxed with exaggeration who spoke of Fields of radiance, whose unfading light Has travelled the profound six thousand years, Nor yet arrived in sight of mortal things. Yet the fields which he describes are far within the circle to which the observations of the astronomer extend." Dr. Halley has also advanced what, he says, seems to be a meta- physical paradox ; namely, that the number of the fixed stars must be more than finale, and some of them at more than finate distances from us ; and Addison has justly observed, " That this thought is far from being extravagant, when we consider that the universe is the work of infinite power, prompted by infinite goodness, and having an infinite space to exert itself in, so that our imagination can set no bounds to it." OF THE NATURE OF THE FIXED STARS. Ten thousand suns appear, Of elder beam ; which ask no leave to shine Of our terrestrial star, nor borrow light From the proud regent of our scanty day. BARBAWLD. The immense distance of the fixed stars leaves us but little hope of ever being able to determine their nature with complete certainty. By analogical reasoning, and a careful attention to the various phe- nomena which they present, we may make approaches to this inte- resting and important discovery. From the fruitless attempts which have often been made to deter- mine their annual parallax, it is fully ascertained that they are many thousand times farther distant from us, than the most remote planet which belongs to the solar system ; and yet some of them shine with a degree of brilliancy, which even rivals that of Venus or Jupiter. Hence it is evident they cannot derive their light from the same source as these planets do, viz. from the sun ; and if they derived their light from any other luminous body which was nearer them, that body would certainly be visible to us, as well as those to which it communicated the light which rendered them visible. But as we know of no other luminous body beside the sun from which they could derive their light, it follows that they shine with their own native light. One powerful argument in support of this opinion is, that the stars appear to be much less when examined with a powerful telescope, than they do to the naked eye ; for they appear to be mere luminous points when viewed through a telescope, which magnifies three or four hundred times. Now, if they shone by a borrowed light, they would be as invisible to the naked eye as the satellites of Jupiter or Saturn. But though these satellites be invisible to the naked eye, yet, when viewed through a telescope of a tolerable OP THE NATURE OF THE FIXED STARS. 8S magnifying power, they are not only seen distinctly, but they appear to be much larger than any of the fixed stars. Hence it is inferred that the fixed stars shine by their own proper light ; and when their immense distances are taken into account, we cannot hesitate to ad- mit that their real magnitude considerably exceeds that of any of the planets. The fixed stars, then, seem to be of a nature very similar to the sun ; and that they are suns in reality scarcely admits of a doubt; for the analogy between them may be traced in many particulars. The sun turns on his axis; so do many of the fixed stars, and most probably all.* The suit has spots on his surface ; so has the star Algol and some others, and probably all the stars of the heavens. On the sun these spots are changeable ; so they are on several of the stars, as Dr. Herschel and some other astronomers have repeatedly observed. If, then, the fixed stars resemble the sun in so many par- ticulars, is it not highly probable that each of them is designed to answer similar purposes ? Is it not reasonable to conceive that each star is the centre of a system, and has planets revolving round it, which are illuminated, warmed, and cherished by its light and heat? We certainly cannot imagine that the fixed stars were formed for no other purpose than to cast a faint light upon the earth, especially when we consider that we have incomparably more light from the moon than from all the stars put together, and that innumerable stars, so far from giving us light, are not even discernable, without the aid of the most powerful telescopes. If our sun, with the whole system of planets, moons, arid comets, were to be removed to the distance of the nearest fixed star, not one of them would be visible except the sun, which would then appear, not with the brilliancy and lustre which he does at present, but like a star of the first or second magnitude. Instead, therefore, of looking upon the fixed stars as a curious species of twinkling flames hung-up in the spacious canopy of heaven, merely to ornament it, or to add to the delight of man, let us suffer our conceptions to expand till they embrace a wider field of contemplation : but in doing this let us also keep within the bounds of probability, which the true astronomef on no occasion goes beyond. When the immense distance of the fixed stars is taken into consi- deration, we shall not be accused of soaring into the regions of fancy, although we affirm each of these stars not only to be a sun with a system of planets and comets moving round it, but that it is highly probable each star is at least equal, both in brilliancy and magnitude, to the sun himself. And if it once be admitted that each star is the centre of a system, and has planets or earths revolving round it in the same manner as our sun has, is it not agreeable both to reason and analogy to suppose these planets inhabited by rational creatures ? When every part of matter upon which we have any opportunity of making observations, is found fitted for the habitation and support of * The period in which the star Algol goes through its variations is two days twenty-one hours. 8. I 86 OF THE NATURE OF THE FIXED STARS. living creatures peculiar to itself; when we meet with no part of na- ture lying waste and useless; and when we find that not only seas, lakes and rivers, mountains and valleys, trees and herbs, grasses and the animals that feed upon them, teem with life ; but even the blood and humours of animals, when alive as well as dead, support their respective inhabitants ; shall we, with such scenes before our eyes, and in direct opposition, as it were, to the voice of nature, indulge the contracted and unreasonable notion, that the millions of globes which compose the universe are barren and void ? Is it not more rational to suppose them the abodes of intelligent beings; of beings capable of loving and adoring their Creator, provided with every thing neces- sary for their comfort and support, and possessed of capacities neces- sary for social intercourse and active life ? Where things do not admit of mathematical certainty, moral cer- tainty ought to be indulged, especially when aided by the analogy of things which are both known and natural. It would almost be as irrational to suppose animals with eyes destined to live in eternal dark- ness, or without eyes to live in perpetual light, as to imagine space illu- minated where there is nothing to be acted upon. The fixed stars were surely not created merely for the purpose of enlightening a void ! All great astronomers, with Newton at their head, have maintained that the stars are all suns, and surrounded with planetary bodies which they enlighten, warm, and cherish in the same manner as the sun does the bodies which circulate round him. And the celebrated Huygens says, " Why should we conclude that our star (that is the sun) has better attendance than others ? They must all have their planets and animals ; nay their rational creatures too." But we forbear to proceed further in the path of speculation on this sublime subject, although it is almost impossible to avoid it ; for when we reflect on the millions of millions of worlds placed at the distance of millions of miles from each other, and each of these worlds inhabited by millions of rational creatures, formed for never-ending felicity, the idea though delightful must necessarily be vague and indefinite. Really when indulging such contemplations, we can scarcely help acknowledging, that all our science is as nothing, and that we have yet to be initiated in the principles of a new notation, which may enable us to comprehend these astonishing numbers. My soul unused to stretch her powers, In flights so daring, drops her weary wing, And seeks again the known accustomed spot, Drest up with sun and shade, and lawns, and streams, A mansion fair and spacious for its guest, And full replete with wonders. BARBAUI.D. OF ECLIPSES. 87 OF ECLIPSES. Of all the various phenomena of the heavens there are none which have created so much curiosity, excited so much interest, or caused so great terror throughout the world, as eclipses of the sun and moon ; and to those who are unacquainted with the principles of astronomy there is nothing perhaps which appears more extraordinary than the accuracy with which they can be predicted. In the earlier ages of the world, before science had enlightened the minds of men, appearances of this kind were generally regarded as alarming deviations from the established laws of nature ; and but few, even among philosophers themselves, were able to account for these extraordinary appearances. At length, when men began to apply themselves to observations, and when the motions of the celestial bo- dies were better understood, their phenomena were not only found to depend upon a regular cause, but to admit of a natural and easy so- lution. There are, however, nations that still entertain the most superstitious notions respecting eclipses, particularly the Mexicans and Chinese, whose conduct on the appearance of a phenomenon of this kind is well described in the fpllowing lines : Thus when the infant moon her circling sphere Wheels o'er the sun's broad disk, her shadow falls On earth's fair bosom ; darkness chills the fields, And dreary night invests the face of heaven. Reflected from the lake full many a star Glimmers with feeble languor. India's sons Affrighted in wild tumult rend the air. Before his idol god with barb'rous shriek The Brachman* falls : when soon the eye of day Darts his all-cheering radiance, from the gloom Emerging. Joy invades the wondring crowd. And acclamation rushes from the tongues Of thousands, that around their blazing pile Riot in antic dance and dissonant song. ZOUCH. Many instances are to be found, not only in ancient, but even in comparatively modern history, where the superstition of the times has continued to connect the records of eclipses with the details of some remarkable event, which either happens soon after or during their con- tinuance. But these details being foreign to the nature of the present work, we shall proceed to give an account of the causes, and various kinds of eclipses of the sun and moon. Teach me the various labours oi the moon, And whence proceed th' eclipses of the sun. * Although the Chinese perform the most ridiculous and superstitious ceremo- nies during the time of an eclipse, yet they can calculate them with the greatest precision. I 2 88 OF ECLIPSES, As every planet belonging to the solar system, both primary and secondary, derives its light from the sun, it must cast a shadow to- wards that part of the heavens which is opposite to the sun. This shadow is of course nothing but a privation of light in the space hid from the sun by the opaque body, and will always be proportionate to the relative magnitudes of the sun and planet. If the sun and planet were both of the same size, the form of the shadow cast by the planet would be that of a cylinder, the diameter of which would be the same as that of the sun or planet, and it would never converge to a point. If the planet were larger than the sun, the shadow would continue to spread or diverge ; but as the sun is much larger than the greatest of the planets, the shadows cast by any one of these bodies must converge to a point, the distance of which from the planet will be proportionate to the size and distance of the planet from the sun. The magnitude of the sun is such that the shadow cast by each of the primary planets always converges to a point before it reaches any other planet; so that not one of the primary planets can eclipse ano- ther. The shadow of any planet which is accompanied by satellites may, on certain occasions, eclipse these satellites; but it is not long enough to eclipse any other body. The shadow of a satellite or moon may also, on certain occasions, fall on the primary and " eclipse it. Eclipses of the sun and moon happen when the moon is near her nodes, that is, when she is either in the plane of the ecliptic or very near it. Those of the sun happen only at new moon, or when the moon is in conjunction with the sun; whilst those of the moon happen at the time of full moon, or when the moon is in opposition to the sun. The sun, earth, and moon, must therefore always Jbe nearly in the same straight line at the time of an eclipse ; and ^cbriv&sely^ when these three bodies are nearly in a straight line, an eclipse must take place. Hence, it is evident, that an eclipse happens in consequence of one of the two opaque bodies, the earth and the moon, being so placed as to prevent the sun's light from falling on the other. See the following figure, which represents the moon passing through the dark shadow of the earth, as she moves in her orbit n z, while tlje earth moves in the ecliptic r g. The interposition of the moon between the sun and the earth pro- duces an eclipse of the sjm ; and the interposition of the earth between the moon and the sun, so that its shadow falls on the moon, produces OF ECLIPSES. 89 an eclipse of the moon. On these principles the whole phenomena of eclipses depend, and admit of complete explanation. If the moon's orbit were coincident with the plane of the ecliptic, '\ the moon's shadow would fall upon the earth, and occasion a central { eclipse of the sun at every conjunction, or new moon; whilst the j earth's shadow would fall on the moon, and occasion a total eclipse \ of that body at every opposition or full moon. For as the moon would then always move in the ecliptic, the centres of the sun, earth, and moon, would all be in the same straight line at both of these times. But the moon's orbit is inclined to the ecliptic, and forms A with it an angle of about 5 10' ; and, therefore, the moon is never in ^ the ecliptic except when she is in one of her nodes: hence, there may be a considerable number of conjunctions and oppositions of the sun ) and moon without any eclipse taking place. The moon is always at some distance from the ecliptic, except -. when she is in one of her nodes ; and this distance is called her lati- \ tude y which is north or south, according as the moon is on the north \ or south side of the ecliptic. Now if the moon has any latitude, / there cannot be a central eclipse, for this can only happen when the moon is in one of her nodes at the moment of conjunction, which is ) very seldom the case ; and, of course, very few central eclipses of \ the sun have taken place since the creation of the world/ But the , section of the earth's shadow (through which the moon passes when she is eclipsed) being much larger than the disc of the moon, the moon may be totally eclipsed, although she be at some distance from / her node at the time of opposition ; but its duration will be the greater ^ the nearer she is to the node. An eclipse of the sun may also happen / although the moon be at some distance from her node at the time of conjunction ; but its form, as well as its duration, depend very much / upon that distance. This circumstance has occasioned the division of eclipses into central, total, annular, and partial. As the meaning of these terms must be obvious to the reader, it is almost unnecessary to give an explanation of them. A central eclipse, is that in which the centre of the shadow falls on the centre of the body which is eclipsed. A total eclipse is the obscuration of the whole body eclipsed. An annular eclipse is that in which the whole of the body eclipsed is hid, except a ring round its edge, which remains luminous. A partial eclipse is that in which part of the eclipsed body is hid from view. The following figure represents a partial eclipse of the sun, which will be visible to that tract of the earth marked npo, the line m n marks when the greatest obscuration. * One of the most remarkable eclipses of this kind which has ever happened, was visible in Britain and several other countries, on the Tth of September, 1820. 90 OF ECLIPSES. If the distance be very small, the eclipse will be the greater and continue the longer ; but no eclipse of the sun can be either central or total, except the moon be in the very node at the time of conjunc- tion. But should she be in this situation, when she is at her least distance from the earth, and the earth, at the same time, at its least distance from the sun, then the eclipse will not only be central but total, and continue so for a few minutes. But if the moon happens to ]be at her greatest distance from the earth, and the earth at its greatest distance from the sun, the eclipse will be annular, or a small space round the sun's centre only will be hid from view, and a bright lucid ring round his edge will remain visible. If the moon be less than 17|- degrees from either node at the time of conjunction, her shadow will fall more or less upon the earth, ac- cording as she is more or less within this limit; and, of course, the sun will suffer a partial eclipse. And if she be less than 12| degrees from either node at the time of orrrjosition, she will pass through more or less of the earth's shadow, according as she is more or less within these lines, and of course she will suffer an eclipse. As these limits form but a small part of the moon's orbit, which is 360 degrees, eclipses happen but seldom ; however in no year can there be fewer than two, and there may be seven of the sun and moon together but taking one year with another, there are about four each year. But as the sun and moon spend as much time below the hori- zon of any place as above it, half the number of the eclipses will be invisible at any particular place, and consequently there will be only two eclipses visible in a year at that place, the one of the sun and the other of the moon.* Every eclipse, whether of the sun or moon, is visible at some place of the earth's surface, and invisible at others; for the rational horizon of every place divides both the earth and heavens into two equal portions or hemispheres ; and as no celestial body can be seen except ) it be above the spectator's horizon, it follows that any eclipse which / is visible in the one hemisphere cannot be visible in the other, because ^ the body which is eclipsed is below the horizon of that other. If a ) lunar eclipse, for example, happens at any hour of the night, between * If there be seven eclipses in any year, five of them must be of the sun and two of the moon. OF ECLIPSES. 91 the time of sun-setting and sun-rising, at any particular place, it will be visible there and invisible to the inhabitants of the opposite hemis- < phere, who have the sun above their horizon at that time ; for the sun and moon are in opposite^ parts of the heavens at the time of a lunar eclipse. And with respect to solar eclipses, it is evident that they can only be seen at any place when the sun is above the horizon of that place. There is, however, a difference with regard to the visi- bility of a solar and lunar eclipse ; for an eclipse of the moon has the same appearance to all the inhabitants of that hemisphere to which the moon is visible at the time, owing, in, part, to the small dis- tance of the moon from the earth. But an eclipse of the sun may be visible to some places and invisible to others in the same hemisphere of the earth, because the moon's shadow is small in comparison of the earth ; for its breadth, excluding the penumbra, is only about 180 miles even in central eclipses.* Hence those places which are con- siderably distant from the path of the shadow will either have no eclipse at all, or a very small one ; while places near the middle of the shadow will have the greatest possible. There is also a difference in the absolute time at which a solar eclipse happens at the various places where it is visible; for it appears more early to the western parts, and later to the eastern, on account of the motion of the moon (and of course her shadow) from west to east. In most solar eclipses the moon's disc may be observed by a teles- cope to be covered by a faint light, whieh is attributed to the re- flexion of light from the illuminated part of the earth. When the eclipses are total, the moon's limb is surrounded by a pale circle of light, which some astronomers consider as an indication of a lunar atmosphere, but others, as occasioned by the atmosphere of the sun ; because it has been observed to move equally with the sun and not with the moon. Dr. Halley, in describing a central eclipse of the sun, which hap- pened at London in April, 1715, says, that although the disc of the sun was wholly covered by the moon, a luminous ring of a faint pearly light surrounded the body of the moon the whole time ; and its breadth was nearly a tenth of the moon's diameter. In lunar eclipses, the moon seldom disappears entirely; and on some occasions, even the spots may be distinguished through the shade ; but this can only be the case when the moon is at her greatest distance from the earth at the time of the eclipse, for the nearer the moon is to the earth the darkness is the greater. In some instances, the moon has disappeared entirely ; and the celebrated astronomer JHeraclius, has taken notice of one where the moon could not be seen even with a telescope, though the night was remarkably clear. Although eclipses of the sun and moon were long considered by the ignorant and superstitious as presages of evil, yet they are of the greatest use in astronomy, and maybe employed to improve some of * A penumbra is the faint shadow produced by an opaque body when opposed to a luminous one. 0$ OF ECLIPSES, / the most important and useful of the sciences. By eclipses of the \ moon the earth is proved to be of a. globular form, the sun to be greater ( than the earth, and the earth greater than the moan. When they are similar in all their circumstances, and happen at considnrable intervals of time, they also serve to ascertain the real period of the moon's mo- tion. In geography, eclipses are of considerable use in determining the longitude of places, and particularly eclipses of the moon, because they are oftener visible than those of the sun, and the same eclipse is of equal magnitude and duration at all places where it is seen. In chronology, both solar and lunar eclipses serve to determine exactly the time of any past event. We, in the dark eclipse, with filial awe i *^ Trace the all-gracious Parent of the spheres ; Their distances and their proportion learn ; Extending navigation ; securing The mariner thro' the tremendous waves. EODOSIA. For the purpose of finding the longitude at places on the earth, eclipses of Jupiter's satellites are found much more useful than eclipses of the moon ; not only on account of their happening more frequently, but on account of their instantaneous commencement and termi- nation. When Jupiter and any of his satellites are in a line with the sun, and Jupiter between the satellite and the sun, it disappears, being then eclipsed, or involved in his shadow. When the satellite goes behind the body of Jupiter, with respect to a spectator on the earth, it is said to be occulted, being hid from our sight by his body, whether in his shadow or not. And when the satellite comes into a position between Jupiter and the sun, it casts a shadow on the face of that planet, which is seen by a spectator on the earth as an obscure round spot. Lastly, when the satellite is in a line with Jupiter and the earth, it appears on his disc as a round black spot, which is termed a transit of the satellite. As these phenomena appear at the same moment of absolute time at all places on the earth to which Jupiter is then visible, but at dif- ferent hours of relative time, according to the distance between the meridian of the places at which observations are made, it follows that this difference of time converted into degrees will be the difference of longitude between those places.* Suppose, for example, that a per- son at London observed an eclipse to begin at 11 o'clock in the evening, and that a person at Barbadoes observed the same at 7 o'clock in the evening, it is certain the eclipse was seen by both per- sons at the same moment of absolute time, although there is four hours' difference in their manner of reckoning that time : and this converted into degrees (at the rate of 15 degrees to an hour) is the * Absolute time is that which is computed from the same moment ; relative is that which is computed from different moments. ON LIGHT. 9# difference of longitude between these two places therefore Barba- does is 60 degrees west from London, the time not being so far ad- vanced there as at London. Another phenomenon, somewhat similar to an eclipse, sometime? takes place, by which the longitude of places may be determined, although not quite so easily, nor perhaps so accurately, as by the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites. This is the hiding or obscuring of a fixed star or planet by the moon or other planet, which takes place when the moon or planet is in conjunction with the star. Appear- ances of this kind are termed occultations. They are very little at- tended to except by practical astronomers, who employ them for the correction of the lunar tables, and settling the longitude of places, as already stated. ON LIGHT. Fairest of beings ! first created light ! Prime cause of beauty ! for from thee alone The sparkling gem, the vegetable race, The nobler worlds that live and breathe their charms, The lovely hues peculiar to each tribe, From thy unfading source of splendour draw In thy pure shine, with transport I survey This firmament, and these her rolling worlds Their magnitudes and motions. MALLET. The nature of Light has been the subject of speculation and con- jecture among philosophers, from the iirst dawnings of philosophy to the present day. But of all the conjectures which have been ad- vanced on this curious and interesting subject, there is scarcely one supported by evidence sufficient to entitle it to preference over the other. There are, however, two opinions on this subject which have prevailed more generally than any of the others, and therefore, it may be proper to notice them here, although the design of the present work is rather to state what is known respecting any phenomenon, than to indulge in conjectures concerning it. The celebrated Huygens considered light as a subtle fluid filling space, and rendering bodies visible by the undulations into which it was thrown. According to this theory, when the sun rises it agitates this fluid, the undulations gradually extend themselves, and at last striking against our eyes, we see the sun. This opinion of Hyugens was adopted by Euler, one of the best mathematicians that ever lived, who exerted the whole of his consummate mathematical skill in its defence. Sir I. Newton and many other distinguished philosophers consider light as a substance consisting of small particles, constantly separating from luminous bodies, moving in straight lines, and rendering other bodies luminous by passing from them and entering the eye. New- ton has been at great pains to establish this theory, and has certainly 94 ON LIGHT* shown that all the phenomena of light may be mathematically deduced from it. While Huygens and Euler have attempted to support their hypo- thesis, rather by starting objections to Newton's, than by bringing forward direct proofs, Newton and his disciples, on the contrary, have shown that the known phenomena of light are mcfmsistent with the undulations of a fluid, and that on such a supposition there can be no such thing as darkness at all. They have also brought forward a great number of direct arguments in support of their theory, which it has been impossible to answer.* But without giving' a decided pre- ference to any theory, we shall proceed to state some of its properties. Roemer, a Danish astronomer, while engaged in making observa- tions on the satellites of Jupiter, found that in eclipses they emerged from the shadow at certain times a few minutes later, and at others a few minutes sooner than they ought to have done according to the tables, which had been previously constructed to shew the times of their revolutions, eclipses, &c. On comparing these apparent irre- gularities together, he found that the eclipses happened before or after the computed time, according as the earth was nearer to or farther from Jupiter. Hence he formed the ingenious conjecture, which was soon demonstrated to be the case, that the motion of light is not in- stantaneous, as was then generally believed, but that it required a certain portion of time, to pass from the luminous body to the eye of the observer. According to Roemer's calculation, it was about seven minutes in traversing the radius of the earth's orbit ; but it has since been found, that when the earth is exactly between Jupiter and the sun, his satellites are eclipsed about 8 \ minutes sooner than the time found by the tables ; but when the earth is nearly in the opposite point these eclipses happen about 8^ minutes later than that deter- mined by the tables. It is therefore concluded that light takes up about 16f minutes of time to pass over a space equal to the diameter of the earth's orbit, which is at least one hundred and ninety millions of miles; it therefore moves at the rate of nearly 200,000 miles per second, which is about 10,300 times faster than the earth in its orbit, and 1,550,000 times quicker than a cannon ball.f Behold the light emitted from the sun ! What more familiar, and what more unknown ? While by its spreading radiance it reveals All Nature's face, it still itself conceals. See how each morn it does its beams display, And on its golden wings bring back the day ! * M. Delaval maintains, that all light is reflected by white particles, and coloured in its transmission. No transparent medium reflects any light when examined within a blackened bottle ; this is shewn by experiments on 68 kinds of fluids, and on many kinds of glasses, and other substances. For this, and for the colours of the sea, M. Delaval proposes a very singular theory; but those who wish to become particularly acquainted with it, must consult his work on the permanent colours of opaque bodies. t The real time which light takes to pass from the sun to the earth is 8 minute 13 seconds. ON LIGHT* Haw soon the effulgent emanations fly Thro' the blue gulf of interposing sky ! How soon their lustre all the region fills, Smiles on the valleys, and adorns the hills : Millions of miles, so rapid is their race, To cheer the earth, they in few minutes pass. Amazing progress ! At its greatest stretch, What human mind can this swift motion reach ? BLACKMOR&. The velocity of light being known, it is easy to know the time it requires to arrive at the earth from any of the planets, or even the fixed stars if their distance be known. For it has been ascertained, that the reflected light of the planets and satellites, travels with the same velocity as the direct light of the sun or fixed stars ; and that the velocity is the same from whatever distance it comes. The discovery of Roemer has been completely confirmed by ano- ther most important discovery made by our countryman Dr. Brad- ley, while engaged in making a series of observations, with a view to determine the annual parallax of the fixed stars. This celebrated as- tronomer found that the aberration or difference between the true and apparent place of a fixed star, is occasioned by the progressive motion of light, combined with the motion of the earth in its orbit ; and that this aberration when greatest amounted to 20>232. Now the earth describes an arc of 20"-232, in 8' 13", the time that light takes to pass over the semidiameter of the earth's orbit. This circumstance, therefore, not only affords one of the most convincing proofs of the motion of the earth in its orbit, but entirely overthrows both the Pto- lemaic and Tychonic systems, and completely establishes the motion of the earth. As the rays of light are known to proceed only in straight lines from luminous bodies, and as the earth is constantly moving forward in its orbit, it is evident that a ray of light proceeding from any celestial body will impinge on the earth at a different point from what it would have done had the earth been stationary. It is therefore ne- cessary, in making astronomical observations with nicety, to make allowance for the aberration. When a fixed star or planet, for ex- ample, is seen through a tube or telescope, the tube does not point exactly to the true place of the star or planet, but to its apparent place, which is always more advanced in the direction we are moving than its true place, by a quantity equal to the aberration of the ob- ject.* But this will, perhaps, be better understood by the following illustration, which is given by M. Maupertius in his Elements of Geo- "The direction," says he, "in which a gun must be pointed to strike a bird in its flight, is not exactly that of the bird, but of a point a little before it, in the path of its flight; and that so much the more as the flight of the bird is more rapid, with respect to the flight * The aberration not only affects the longitude of a star or planet, but also its atitude, declensions, and right ascension. (i OF THET AURORA BOREALIS. of the shot. In this way of considering the matter, the flight of the bird represents the motion of the earth, and the flight of the shot the motion of the light proceeding from the object." Many philosophers have attempted, not only to compare the light of the stars with that of the sun, but also to ascertain their distances by comparisons of this kind. The Rev. Mr. Mitchell, in an elaborate and ingenious paper in the Transactions of the Royal Society, states, that our sun would still appear as luminous as the star Sirius, although removed to 400,000 times his present distance ; and that the fixed stars cannot be nearer than this, if they be equal to the sun in lustre and magnitude, and that they are so is the opinion of the most celebrated astronomers of the present day. Euler, who has already been mentioned, makes the light of the sun equal to 6,500 candles at one foot distance ; the moon equal to one candle at 7-| feet distance ; Venus to one at 421 feet ; and Jupiter to one at 1320 feet. From this comparison it fol- lows, the light of the sun exceeds that of the moon 364,000 times. It is therefore no wonder that the attempts which have been made by some philosophers to condense the light of the moon by lenses, have been attended with so little success. Fjor, should one of the largest of these lenses even increase the light of the moon one thou- sand times, still, in this increased state, it will be three hundred and sixty-four times less than the intensity of the common light of the sun. The intensity of light has been found to vary as the square of the distance ; for, if an object be placed one foot distant from a candle, it will receive four times more light than when it is removed to double the distance; nine times more than when it is removed to three times the distance, and so on. The refraction, &c. of light will be noticed whert treating of the atmosphere. OF THE AURORA BOREALIS. Silent from the north A blaze of meteors shoots : ensweeping first The lower skies, they all at once converge High to the crown of heaven, and all at once, ' Relapsing quick, as quickly reascend, And mix, and thwart, extinguish, and renew, All ether coursing in a blaze of light. THOMSON. The Aurora Borealis, or Northern Lights, are luminous meteors, which sometimes appear in the northern part of the heavens in the winter season, and particularly in frosty weather. They are usually of a reddish colour, inclining to yellow, but they frequently send out coruscations of pale whitish light. These seem to rise from the ho- rizon in a pyramidical form, and move backwards and forwards with a tremulous undulating motion; but on some occasions they shoot to the zenith with the greatest velocity, and then form themselves OF THE AURORA ROREALIS. 97 into the most whimsical figures. This has led M. Godin to suppose, that most of the extraordinary meteors and prodigies which are stated in history to have been seen in the skies, such as battles, and the like, may probably enough have been produced by particular forms assumed by Aurora Borealis. From look to look, contagious thro' the crowd The panic runs, and into wondrous shapes Th' appearance throws : armies in meet array Throng'd with aerial spears and steeds of fire, Till the long lines of full-extended war, In bleeding fight commixt, the sanguine flood Rolls a broad slaughter o'er the plains of heaven. As thus they scan the visionary scene, On all sides swells the superstitious din, Incontinent, and busy Frenzy talks Of blood and battle, cities overturn'd, And late at night in swallowing earthquake sunk, Or hideous wrapt in fierce ascending flame ; I Of sallow famine, inundation, storm ; Of pestilence, and every great distress ; Empires subvers'd, when ruling Fate has struck Th' unalterable hour : even Nature's self Is deem'd to totter on the brink of time. Not so the man of philosophic eye, And inspect sage ; the waving brightness he Curious surveys, inquisitive to know The causes and materials, yet unfix'd, Of this appearance, beautiful and new. THOMSON. This kind of meteor never appears near the equator ; but has fre- quently been seen towards the south pole, as well as the north. Forster, in the account of his voyage round the world with Captain Cook, says he observed them for several nights together, in sharp frosty weather, and that they had much the same appearance as those observed in the north, except that they were of a lighter colour. In the Shetland Islands these phenomena are the constant attend- ants of clear evenings, and afford great relief to the inhabitants in the long and gloomy nights of winter experienced in this part of the world. The same kind of appearances are also seen in the northern parts of Sweden and Lapland, where they are particularly beautiful, and afford light to travellers during the whole night. By dancing meteors then, that ceaseless shake A waving blaze refracted o'er the heavens, And vivid moons, and stars that keener play With keener lustre from the glossy waste. Even in the depth of Polar Night they find A wondrous day : enough to light the chase, Or guide their daring steps to Finland fairs. THOMSON. In Hudson's Bay the Aurora Borealis spread a variegated splendour 9 K OF THE AURORA BOREALIS. over the whole sky, not to be defaced even by the splendour of the full moon. In the north-east parts of Siberia these northern lights are observed to begin -with single bright pillars, rising in the north, and almost at the same time in the north-east, which gradually in- creasing, comprehend a large space of the heavens, rush about from place to place, with incredible velocity, and finally almost cover the whole sky up to the zenith, producing an appearance, as if a vast tent were expanded in the heavens, glittering with gold, rubies, and saphires. A more beautiful spectacle cannot be painted; but no person could behold it for the first time without terror. For, however grand the illumination may appear, it is attended with as much hiss- ing, crackling, and tumult, as if the largest fire-works were playing off. The hunters who pursue the white and blue foxes on the con- fines of the icy sea, are often overtaken in their courses by these northern lights ; their dogs are then so much frightened, that they will not move, but lie obstinately on the ground till the noise has passed. It is chiefly in the arctic regions that the Aurora Borealis are most striking in their appearance. In England it is only their extremities that are seen, and even these have been noticed very seldom : for there are none recorded in our annals between the appearance of the remarkable one of Nov. 14th, 1574, and the surprising one of March 6th, 1716, which appeared for three nights successively. This one was visible from the west of Ireland to the confines of Russia and east of Poland, and from the 30th degree of latitude, over almost all the north of Europe ; and in all places, at the same time, it exhibited the same wonderful appearances. Father Boscovich calculated the height of an Aurora Borealis which appeared on the 16th December, 1737, and found that it was 825 miles; and the celebrated Bergman, from a mean of thirty computations, makes the average height of the Aurora Borealis 70 Swedish or 469 English miles. But Euler and some other philosophers suppose their height to be several thousand miles. Aurora Borealis were long considered by the ignorant and super- stitious as portending war, pestilence, and famine. And this was not only the opinion of the inhabitants of the northern islands, but even the inhabitants of this country were alarmed at their appearance. When the splendid Aurora Borealis of 1716 first made its appear- ance, it was viewed with the greatest consternation by the vulgar ; and considered by them as marking the introduction of a foreign race of princes into this country.* Since that time, these meteors have been so common that they have not excited any particular interest, and are now viewed with the greatest indifference by all classes of society. Many conjectures have been made, at various periods, respecting the cause of this phenomenon; but since the identity of lightning * George the First came to the throne of Great Britain on the 1st of August, 1714. OF THE AURORA BOREALIS. 90 With the electric fluid has been ascertained, philosophers have been naturally led to seek for the explication of aerial meteors in the prin- ciples of electricity ; and there is now little doubt but most of them, and especially Aurora Borealis, are electrical phenomena. Besides the more obvious and known appearances which constitute a resem- blance between this meteor and the electric matter by which lightning is produced, it has been observed, that the Aurora Borealis produces a very sensible fluctuation in the magnetic needle ; and that when it has extended lower than usual into the atmosphere, the flashes have been attended with various sounds of rumbling and hissing, especially in Russia and the other northern parts of Europe. Mr. Canton, soon after he had obtained electricity from the clouds, offered a conjecture that the Aurora is occasioned by the flash- ing of electric fire from positive towards negative clouds at a great distance, through the upper part of the atmosphere, where the resistance is least ; and this appears chiefly in the northern re- gions, as the alteration in the heat of the air in those parts is the greatest. Signior Beccaria supposes that there is a constant and regular cir- culation of the electric fluid from north to south ; and he thinks, that the Aurora Borealis may be this electric matter, performing its circulation in such a state of the atmosphere as renders it visible. Dr. Franklin thinks, that the electric fire discharged into the polar regions, from many miles of vapour raised from the ocean between the tropics, accounts for the Aurora Borealis ; and that this pheno- menon appears first, where it is first put in motion, namely, in the northern regions, and the appearance proceeds southward, though the fire really moves in the opposite direction. Several other eminent philosophers have advanced conjectures respecting the cause of this phenomenon, but our limits will not permit us to insert them.* There is another luminous appearance occasionally seen in the hea- vens after sun-set, and before sun-rise, which somewhat resembles the milky way, but of a fainter light. This phenomenon is called the zodiacal light, because it is only to be seen in the zodiac. Its figure resembles an inverted cone or pyramid, with its base toward the sun, and its axis lying along the zodiac, somewhat inclined to the horizon. It was first discovered by Cassini, in the year 1683; but there is some reason to think it had been observed before that period. The length of this phenomenon, taken from the sun upwards to its vertex, varies from 45 degrees to 100, and even 120 degrees. The season most favourable for observing it, is the beginning of March after sun-set* But its aspect is very different in different years. One of the most brilKant appearances of it was observed at Paris on the 16th of February, 1769. * Seamen who have often visited the north seas consider the appearance of Aurora Borealis as indicative of a gale of wind. K 2 100 OF RAINBOWS, PARHELIA, &C. Various opinions have been advanced respecting the cause of the zodiacal light, as well as the Aurora Borealis ; but the greater num- ber of philosophers agree in ascribing both phenomena to the same cause, namely, the electric fluid. But the celebrated M. de Mairan, who has written a treatise ex- pressly on the Aurora Borealis, supposes that the zodiacal light causes the Aurora Borealis ; and that this light is nothing more than the sun's atmosphere, which is thrown off by means of the rota- tion of that luminary on his axis to such a distance, as to strike on the upper part of the earth's atmosphere, and produce the luminous ap- pearance which we call the zodiacal light. And as this is chiefly collected towards the polar regions, by means of the diurnal revolu- tion of the earth, it will produce the Aurora Borealis. OF RAINBOWS, PARHELIA,* &c. Refracted from yon eastern cloud, Bestriding earth, the grand etherial bow ; Shoots up immense ; and every hue unfolds, In fair proportions running from the red, To where the violet fades into the sky. Here, awful Newton, the dissolving clouds Form, fronting on the sun thy showery prism ; And lo the sage-instructed eye unfold The various twine of light, by thee disclosed From the white mingling maze. THOMSON. Besides the Aurora Borealis, there are several other beautiful phe- nomena occasionally seen in the heavens. Among these may be ranked the Rainbow ; which is, unquestionably, the most beautiful meteor with which we are acquainted. It is never seen but in rainy weather, and in that point of the hea- vens which is opposite to the sun, being occasioned by the refraction and reflection of his rays falling on the drops of rain as they descend to the earth. There are frequently two bows to be seen at the same time an interior and an exterior one. The interior is the brightest, being formed by the rays of the sun falling on the upper parts of the drops of rain ; for a ray of light entering the upper part of a drop of rain, will, by refraction, be thrown upon the inner part of the spherical surface of that drop, whence it will be reflected to the lower part of the drop, where, undergoing a second refraction, it will be bent toward the eye of the spectator. Hence, the rays which fall upon the interior bow come to the eye after two refractions and one reflection; and the colours of this bow from the upper part, are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet. The exterior bow is * Although we have given a short account and representation of the Rainbow in the supplementary part of this work, we have deemed it necessary to give a still more popular account of it here. OF RAINBOWS, PARHELIA, &e. ' 101 formed by the rays of the sun falling on the lower parts of the drops of rain ; these rays also undergo two refractions ; one when they enter the drops, and another when they emerge from them to proceed to the eye : but they suffer two, or more, reflections in the interior sur- face of the drops; hence, the colours of these rays are not so strong and well defined as those in the interior bow, and appear in an inverted order; viz. from the under part they are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet. The rays which fall on the drops that produce the interior bow pro- ceed to the eye of the spectator in a direction, that makes an angle of about 42 degrees with the direction in which they entered the drops ; and those that form the exterior bow at an angle of about 54 de- grees.* This may be proved by a simple experiment, as follows : let a glass globe, filled with water, be suspended in the sun-shine, and let a per- son turn his back to the sun, and view the globe at such a distance, that the part of it which is farthest from the sun may appear of a full red colour ; then will the rays which come from the globe to the eye make an angle of 42 degrees with the sun's direct rays; and, if the eye remain in the same position, while another person gradually lowers the globe, the orange, yellow, and other colours, will appear in succession, as in the interior rainbow. Again : if the glass globe be elevated, till the side nearest the sun appear red, the rays which come from the globe to the eye will make an angle of about 50 degrees; and if the globe be again gradually raised as before, the rays will successively change from red to orange, yellow; &c. as in the exterior bow. Alt rainbows are arcs of equal circles , and, consequently, are all equally large, though we do not always see an equal quantity of them: for the eye of the spectator is the vertex of a cone, and its circular base is the rainbow, of which one half is the greatest portion that can be seen at once. Although lunar rainbows have been observed, yet they occur but very seldom. A very brilliant and remarkable one was seen in the year 1710, at Glopwell Hall, in Derbyshire, about eight o'clock in the evening. The moon had passed the full about twenty-four hours, and the evening had been rainy; but the clouds were dispersed, and the moon then shone very clear. This iris /wwamhad all the colours of the solar iris exceedingly beauti" ful and distinct, but faint in comparison with those that are seen when the sun is shining very bright ; as must necessarily have been the case, both from the different beams by which it was occasioned, and the disposition of the medium. What most surprised the observer was, the largeness of the arc, k which was not much less than that pro- duced by the sun. Several complete and concentric solar rainbows have sometimes * The angle which the emerging ray makes with the incident ray in the Interior bow is 42 2' for the red, and 40 17' for the violet ; and for the Exterior bow, these angles are 50 57' and 54 7'. Therefore, the space between the bows is about 9 degrees broad. 102 OF RAINBOWS, PARHELIA, &C. been observed in mountainous countries. This extraordinary pheno- menon, first seen by Don TJlloa and his companions in fhe wild heaths of Pambamarca, which he describes as follows.'" At the side opposite to that where the sun rose on the mountain, at the dis- tance of about sixty yards from the spot where we were standing, the image of each of us was represented as if in a mirror ; three concen- tric rainbows, the last or more exterior colour of one of them touched the first or interior colours of the following one, being centred on the head. On the outside of these, at an inconsiderable distance from them, was seen a fourth arc, purely white. They were all perpendi- cular to the horizon ; and as any one of us moved from one side to the other, he was accompanied by the phenomenon, which preserved the same order and disposition. But what seemed most remarkable was, that, although six or seven persons were standing close together, each of us saw the phenomenon as it regarded himself, but did not per- ceive it in the others," A similar phenomenon is described by Mr. Hagarth, F. R.S. as having been seen by him on the evening of the 13th of February, 1780, when ascending a mountain at Rhealt, in Denbighshire. Another singular phenomenon is sometimes to be seen in the hea- vens, which very much resembles the sun ; and, on that account, it has received the name of Parhelion, or mock sun. An extraordinary appearance of this kind was seen near Marienberg, in Prussia, on the 5th of February, 1674. It was of the same apparent size with the sun, which was several degrees above the horizon at the time, and shone with great lustre. The mock sun appeared under the real one, and seemed to increase in lustre as the true sun descended to the ho- rizon, insomuch, that the reddish colour it first exhibited completely vanished ; and it put on the genuine solar light, in proportion as the disc of the real sun approached it. At last the real sun immerged into the counterfeit sun, and remained alone. This phenomenon was considered the more extraordinary, as it appeared perpendicularly under the sun, instead of being to the right or left of it, as parhelia usually are, and of a colour so different from that which mock suns usually exhibit. One or two appearances of the same kind have been seen in Eng- land since that time. On the 28th of August, 1698, about eight o'clock in the morning, there was seen at Sutfbury, in Suffolk, the appearance of three suns at the same time, all extremely brilliant, Beneath a dark watery cloud, in the east, the true sun shone with such splendour that the spectators could not look at it ; and on each side were the reflections. The circles were pot coloured like the rainbow, but white. At the same time, the form of a half moon was visible toward the south, at a considerable distance from the other phenomena, but apparently double the size of the half moon, and of a red colour like that of the rainbow. These phenomena faded away gradually, but continued visible for more than two hours. Two mock suns, an arc of a rainbow, and a halo, were seen at Lyndon, in the county of Rutland, on the !>2d of October, 1721, at eleven in the OF THE ATMOSPHERE, AND ASTRONOMICAL REFRACTION. 163 morning. The parhelia or mock suns were bright and distinct.* They were of a reddish colour towards the sun, but pale or whitish toward the opposite sides, which was also the case with the halo. Still higher in the heavens was an arc of a rainbow, of a curiously inverted form, situated about half way between the halo and the zenith. This arc was as distinct in its colours as the common rain- bow, and of the same breadth. The red colour was on the convex, and the blue on the concave of the arc, which seemed to be about 90 degrees in length ; its centre being very near the zenith. On the top of the halo was a kind of inverted bright arc, of considerable extent. This phenemenon was seen on the following day, and again on the 26th of the same month. Several other phenomena are sometimes to be seen in the heavens, but these are too ephemeral to merit any notice here. OF THE ATMOSPHERE, AND ASTRONOMICAL REFRACTION. The earth is surrounded by a thin fluid mass of matter, called the Air or Atmosphere, which revolves with it in its diurnal motion, and goes round the sun with it every year. This fluid is both ponderous and elastic. Its weight is known from the Torricilian experiment, or that of the barometer ; and its elasticity is proved by simply inverting a vessel full of^air in water. The atmosphere of the earth's surface being pressed by the weight of all above it, is there pressed the closest together ; and therefore the at- mosphere is densist of all at the earth's surface ; and its density necessa- rily diminishes the higher up. For each stratum of air is compressed only by the weight of those above it; the upper strata are therefore less compressed, and consequently less dense, than those below them. The pressure or weight of the atmosphere has been repeatedly de- termined, by various experiments, to be about fourteen pounds on every square inch of the earth's surface. Hence, the total pressure on the whole surface of the earth is 10,686,000,000 hundreds of mil- lions of pounds avoirdupois. From a number of experiments made on the density of the atmos- phere, at various altitudes, by means of the barometer, it has been ascertained, that if heights, from the earth's surface, be taken in arithmetical progression, the density of the corresponding strata of air decrease in geometrical progression. Thus the density of the atmosphere is reduced one-half for every 3f miles of perpendicular ascent. At seven miles in height, the corresponding density is only one-fourth- at 10i miles, one-eighth; at 14 miles, one-sixteenth; * A Halo is an extensive luminous ring, which is sometimes seen to surround the sun and moon, and is supposed to be occasioned by the light of these bodies through the intervening clouds. This appearance is most frequent about the moon. 104 OF THE ATMOSPHERE, AND ASTRONOMICAL REFRACTION. and so on. Since the density of the air decreases at this rapid rate, it is evident that at a very moderate distance from the surface of the earth, its density would be so much diminished, as to render it inca- pable of sustaining animal life. From observation and experiment, it is pretty well known that 45 or 50 miles is the utmost height at which the density is capable of refracting a ray of light ; and, therefore, this may be considered the altitude corresponding to the least sensible de- gree of density ; for, according to the law of its decrease, just stated, the density at this altitude is above 10,000 times less than at the earth's surface. , One of the most extraordinary and useful properties of the atmos- phere, is its reflective power, which causes the heavens to appear luminous when the sun shines ; for were it not for this power, the whole of the heavens, and every thing on the earth, would appear black, or completely dark, except what the sun's rays directly im- pinged upon. The stars would be visible by day as well as by night; and we could see nothing except what was fully exposed to the sun. There could be no twilight, and, consequently, the blackest darkness would immediately succeed the brightest sun- shine when the sun sets ; and the transition would be equally sudden frcm the blackest dark- ness to the brightest sun-shine when the sun rose. But by means of the atmosphere we enjoy the sun's light, reflected from the aerial par- ticles for some time before he rises, and also for some time after he sets. For when the earth, by its revolution on its axis, has turned any particular place away from the sun, the atmosphere above that place will continue to be illuminated for some time. However, as the sun gets farther below the horizon, the less will the atmosphere be illuminated; and when he has got eighteen degrees under the horizon, cease to be illuminated, and then all that part of the heavens which is over the place will become dark : for the place will then be turned too far from the sun, and his rays will strike too high on the atmos- phere to be refracted or bent downwards at that place. In conse- quence of the refractive power of the atmosphere, all the heavenly bodies appear higher than they really are ; for, on account of the va- riation in the density of the air, a ray of light in passing through it will be refracted at every instant, and consequently the path of the ray will be a curve. And as an object is always seen in the direction in which the rays of light proceeding from it enter the eye, it is evident every celestial body will appear more elevated above the horizon than it actually is, by a quantity equal to the refraction which a ray of light suffers in passing from it through the atmosphere to the eye of the observer. When the object is in the zenith, the refraction is quite insensible ; but it increases as the altitude of the object diminishes, till it reaches the horizon, and then the refraction is greatest ; for the rays which proceed from the object, in that situation, enter the atmosphere more obliquely than in any other, and consequently are more turned out of their course. This will be evident from an inspection of the following figure. OF THE ATMOSPHERE, AND ASTRONOMICAL REFRACTION. 105 Where BOD represents the surface of the earth, O the place of an observer, and FGH the surrounding atmosphere. A ray of light proceeding from a body, Z, in the zenith, is not refracted ; but if it proceed from a body at A, it will enter the eye at O, and appear in the direction Oa; if the body be in the horizon, as at E, the rays proceeding from it will enter the eye at O, and appear to come in the direction eO. On some occasions, the horizontal refraction amounts to 36 or 37 minutes, and, generally, to about 33 minutes, which is equal to the diameter of the sun or moon ; and therefore the whole disc of the sun or moon will appear above the horizon, both at rising and setting, although actually below. This is the reason 'that the full moon has sometimes been seen above the horizon before the sun was set. A remarkable instance of this kind was observed at Paris, on the 19th of July, 1750, when the moon appeared visibly eclipsed, while the sun was distinctly to be seen above the horizon. At some seasons of the year the sun appears ten minutes sooner above the horizon in the morning, and continues as much longer above 106 OF THE ATMOSPHERE, AND ASTRONOMICAL REFRACTION. it in the evening, than he would do were there no refraction; and at a mean rate, about seven minutes on any day of the year. The refraction varies, however, very much with the state of the atmosphere. In cold dry weather the air is more dense than in warm weather ; conse- quently the refraction is greater in cold weather than in warm ; and for the same reason, it is greater in cold countries than in hot ones. A remarkable instance of this is mentioned by Dr. Smith in his Optics, where he states, that some Hollanders who wintered in Nova Zembla, in the year 1596, were surprised to find that, after three months' constant darkness, the sun began to appear seventeen days sooner than the time by computation deduced from the latitude, which was 76 degrees. Now this phenomenon can only be accounted for by the extraordinary refraction of the sun's rays in passing through the cold dense air in that climate. At the same altitudes, the sun, moon, and stars, all undergo the same refraction ; for at equal altitudes, the rays which proceed from any of these bodies suffer the same inclination. The horizontal refraction being the gteatest, causes the sun and moon, at rising and setting, to appear of an oval form ; for the lower edge of each being seen through denser atmosphere than the upper edge, is more refracted; consequently, the perpendicular diameter must appear shortened, while the horizontal diameter (which is not affected by refraction) remains the same, and in this way the oval ap- pearance is produced. For the same reason, two fixed stars that are nearer the horizon, and right above each other, appear nearer than when they are high above the horizon ; and if they are both in the horizon, but at some distance from each other, then they will appear at a less distance than they really are ; for the refraction makes each of them higher, and consequently must bring them into parts of their respective vertical circles which are nearer to each other, because all vertical circles converge and meet in the zenith. Hence, in all astro- nomical calculations allowance must be made for refraction, before the true altitude of any celestial body can be obtained. Tables, con- taining this allowance for all altitudes, is to be found in every work on practical astronomy. The atmosphere not ortly occasions celestial bodies to appear higher than they really are, by bending the rays of light as they pass through it, but it also affects terrestrial bodies in the same way. The quan- tity of this refraction is, however, found to vary considerably with the different states of the atmosphere, and is therefore very uncertain. But at a mean rate it may be taken at one-fourteenth part of the distance expressed in degrees in a great circle : or, according to Professor Playfair, it is about one-seventh part of the correction for the earth's curvature, answering to the distance between the ob- server and the object.* * For example, suppose the distance between a person and any conspicuous object to be 5 English miles, and he wishes to know how much it is elevated by refraction. The coitectioa for the earth's curvature on this distance is 16* feet, on-seventti part of which is 2 feet 4 inches, which it rawed by refraction. UNUSUAL REFRACTION OF THE ATMOSPHERE. 107 Many carious and even whimsical effects of terrestrial refraction are mentioned by various authors ; but as our business is chiefly with astronomical refraction, we shall only mention a few of these ef- fects, which have been lately noticed by some of the most intelligent philosophers of the present day. UNUSUAL REFRACTION OF THE ATMOSPHERE. Although the phenomena of unusual refraction have been often ob- served by atrononlers and navigators, yet they do not seem to have attracted particular notice till the year 1797. The unusual elevation of coasts, mountains, and ships, have been long known under the name of looming ; and the same phenomena, when accompanied with inverted images, have been distinguished in France by the name of mirage. Mr. Huddart seems to have been the first person who described an inverted image beneath the real objects; he accounts for this, and other phenomena of elevation, by supposing that, in consequence of the evaporation of the water, the refractive power of the air is not greatest at the surface of the sea, but at some distance above it, in- creasing gradually from the surface of the sea to a line, which he calls the tine of maximum density, and thence diminishing gradually till it becomes insensible. He then shows, that, in passing through such a medium, the rays of light would move in curve lines convex upwards, when they passed above the line of maximum density, and convex downwards when they passed below that line. Hence, two pencils from the object will arrive at the eye, which will produce an inverted image of the object. In the year 1798, the Rev. Dr. Vince, of Cambridge, made a series of interesting observations at Ramsgate, on the unusual refrac- tion of the atmosphere. He made his observations with a terrestrial telescope, magnifying between thirty and forty times, when the height of the eye was about twenty-five feet above the surface of the sea. Sometimes the height of the eye was eighty feet ; but this produced no variation in the phenomena. On the 1st of August, between four and eight o'clock, p. M. he saw the topmast of a ship as at A, 106 UNUSUAL REFRACTION OF THE ATMOSPHERE. above the horizon xy of the sea : at the same time, he also discovered in the field of view two complete images, B, C, of the ship in the air, vertical to the ship itself, B being inverted, and C erect, having their hulls joined. As the ship receded from the shore, less and less of its mast became visible; and as it descended, the images B and C ascended; but as the ship did not recede below the horizon, Dr. Vince did not observe at what time, and in what order, the images vanished. He then directed his telescope to another ship A, whose hull was just in the horizon x y, and he observed a complete inverted image B, the mainmast of which just touched that of the ship itself. In this case there was no second image as before. While the ship A moved along, B followed its motion, without any change of appearance. Dr. Vince observed a number of other ships, which produced va- riously formed images ; but our limits will not permit us to give a particular description of them, nor of similar appearances which have been observed on various occasions at land* We shall, however, notice a few of the experiments made by Dr. Wollaston, to illustrate his theory of the cause of unusual refraction. According to this ingenious philoshpher, the varying density of the atmosphere is the principal cause of the singular appearances which we have just mentioned ; and from a number of interesting experi- ments, he found, that the results were perfectly conformable to this hypothesis. He took a square phial, and poured a small quantity of clear syrup into it, and above this an equal quantity of water, which gradually incorporated with the syrup, between the pure water and the pure syrup. The word syrup written on a card, and held behind the bottle, appeared erect through the piire syrup ; but when seen through the visible medium of the syrup and water, it appeared inverted with an erect image above. * This subject has been fully treated by Dr. Wollaston, in the Philosophical Transactions for 1810. / ":. OF THE CLOUDS. 109 Dr. Wollaston then put nearly the same quantity of rectified spirit of wine above the water, and he observed a similar appearance ; only in this case, the true place of the object was seen uppermost, and the inverted and erect images below. When the variations of density are great, the object may be held close to the phial; but when they become more gradual, the object is only elongated, and in order to be seen inverted, must be held one or two inches behind the phial. By examining an oblique line seen in this way, he found, that the appearances continue many hours even with spirit of wine; with syrup, two or three days ; with sulphuric acid, four or five ; and still longer with a solution of gum-arabic. Dr. Wollaston next heated a poker red hot, and looked along the side of it at a paper ten or twelve feet distant. A perceptible refrac- tion took place at the distance of three-eighths of an inch from it. A letter, more than three-eighths of an inch distant, appeared erect as usual ; at a less distance there was a faint reversed image of it ; and still nearer the poker was a second image erect. Although the experimental method of illustrating the phenomena of unusual refraction, as given by Dr. Wollaston, is in every respect an excellent one, yet the employment of different fluids does not repre- sent the case which actually exists in nature. The method employed by Dr. Brewster seems more agreeable to nature. His method consists in holding a keat ed iron above a mass of water, bounded by parallel plates of glass. As the heat descends through the fluid, a regular variation of den- sity is produced, which gradually increases from the surface to the bottom. If the heated iron be withdrawn, and a cold body substituted in its place, or even the air allowed to act alone, the superficial strata of water will give out their heat so as to have an increase of density from the surface to a certain depth below it. Through the medium thus constituted, all the phenomena of unusual refraction may be seen in the most beautiful manner ; the variation of density being produced by heat alone. OF THE CLOUDS. Ye mists and exhalations that now rise From hill or steaming lake, dusky or gray, Till the sun paint your fleecy skirts with gold, In honour to the world's Great Author rise, Whether to deck with clouds th' uncoloured sky, Or wash the thirsty earth with falling showers, Rising or falling, still advance his praise. MILTON. Clouds are generally supposed to consist of vapour which has been raised from the sea and land by means of heat. These vapours ascend till they reach air of the same specific gravity with themselves, 10 L HO OP THE CLOUDS. when they combine with each other, become more dense and opaque, and then become visible. The thinner or rarer the clouds are, the higher do they ascend in the air; however, it seldom happens thatjtheir height exceeds two miles. The greater number of clouds are suspended at the height of one mile ; and when they are highly electrified, their height is not above eight or nine hundred yards. While Don Ulloa was in South America, measuring a degree of the meridian, he was for some time stationed on the summit of Cota- paxi, a mountain about three miles above the level of the sea, where he says the clouds could be seen at a great distance below, and that he could hear the horrid noise of the thunder and tempests, and even see the lightnings issue from the clouds far below him. The wonderful variety observable in the colours of clouds is owing to their particular position with respect to the sun, and the different reflections of his light. The various figures which they so readily assume, is supposed to proceed from their loose and voluble texture, revolving in any form, according to the direction and force of the wind, or to the quantity of electric matter which they contain. Sometime we see a cloud that's dragonish ; A vapour, sometime, like a bear or lion, A towered citadel, a pendent rock, A forked mountain, a blue promontory, With trees upon't that nod unto the world, And mock our eyes with air. That which is now a horse, even with a thought, The rock dislimns, and makes it indistinct As water is in water. SHAKSPEARE. About the tropics the clouds roll themselves into enormous masses, as white as snow, turning their borders into the forms of hills, piling themselves upon each other, and exhibiting the shapes of mountains, caverns, and rocks. "There," says St. Pierre, "may be perceived amid endless ridges, a multitude of valleys, whose openings are dis- tinguished by purple and vermillion." These celestial valleys exhibit, in their various colours, matchless tints of white, melting into shades of different colours. Here and there may be observed torrents of light issuing from the dark sides of the mountains, and pouring their streams, like ingots of gold and silver, over rocks of coral. These appearances are not more to be admired for their beauty than for their endless combinations, for they vary every instant. What, a moment before, was luminous, becomes coloured ; what was coloured, min- gles into shade ; forming singular and most beautiful representations of islands and hamlets, arched bridges stretched over wide rivers, immense ruins, huge rocks, and gigantic mountains. Among the Highlands of Scotland the clouds also display the finest outlines, and assume the most beautiful figures ; more especially when viewed from their rugged and lofty summits. These bold and mag- nificent scenes are finely described by Dr. Beattie in the following lines : OF THE CLOUDS. Ill Oft when the wintry storm had ceased to rave. He roamed the snowy waste at even, to view The clouds stupendous, from the Atlantic wave High lowering, sail along the horizon blue ; Where, 'midst the changeful scenery, ever new, Fancy a thousand wondrous forms descries, More wildly great, than ever pencil drew; Rocks, torrents, gulfs, and shapes of giant size, And glitt'ring cliff's on cliffs and fiery ramparts rise. Minstrel. "Clouds," says Dr. Thompson, " are not formed in all parts of the horizon at once ; the formation begins in one particular spot, while the rest of the air remains clear as before ; and though the greatest quan- tity of vapour exists in the lower strata of the atmosphere, clouds never begin to form there, but always at some considerable height." It is remarkable, says the same author, that the part of the atmos- phere at which they form has not arrived at the point of extreme moisture, nor near that point, even a moment before their formation. They are not formed, then, because a greater quantity of vapour has got into the air than could remain there without passing its maxi- mum. It is still more remarkable, that when clouds are formed, the temperature of the spot does not always suffer a diminution, although this may sometimes be the case. On the contrary, the heat of the clouds themselves is sometimes greater than that of the surrounding air. Neither, then, is the formation of the clouds owing to the capa- city of air for combining with moisture being lessened by cold. So far from this being the case, we often see clouds, which had remained in the atmosphere during the heat of the day, disappear in the night, after the heat of the air was diminished. The formation of clouds and rain, then, cannot be accounted for by the principles with which we are acquainted. It is neither to the saturation of the atmosphere, nor the diminution of heat, nor the mix- ture of airs of different temperatures, as Dr. Hutton supposed; for clouds are often formed without any wind at all either above or below them : and even if this mixture constantly took place, the precipitation, instead of accounting for rain, would be almost imperceptible. It is a well-known fact, that evaporation goes on for a month or two together in hot weather without any rain. This sometimes happens in the temperate zone ; and every year in the torrid zone. At Cal- cutta, during the month of January, in the year 1785, it never rained at all : the mean of the thermometer for the whole month was 66f de- grees : there were no high winds, and, during the greater part of the month, scarcely any wind at all. As the moisture which is thus raised by evaporation is not accu- mulated in the atmosphere, above the place from which it was evapo- rated, it must be disposed of in some othe* way ; but the manner in which this is accomplished is not so well known. If it be carried on daily through the different strata of the atmosphere, and wafted to other regions by superior currents of air, it is impossible to account for the different electrical states of the clouds, situated between dif- ferent strata, which often produce the most violent thunder storms. L 2 112 OF THE CLOUDS THE CIRRUS. For vapours are conductors of the electric fluid, and, of course, would daily restore the equilibrium of the whole atmosphere through which they passed. There would, therefore, be no positive and nega- tive clouds, and consequently no thunder storms. Clouds could not have remained in the lower strata of the atmosphere and been daily carried off by winds to other countries ; for there are often no winds at all, during several days, to perform this office ; nor would the dews diminish as they are found to do when the dry weather continues for a long time. It is impossible for us to account for this remarkable fact upon any principle with which we are acquainted. The water can neither remain in the atmosphere, nor pass through it in the state of vapour. It must, therefore, assume some other form ; but what that form is, or how it assumes it, we do not know. In order to render the study of meteorology more systematic, Mr. Luke Haward has lately introduced a scientific nomenclator for dis- tinguishing the various forms or modifications of clouds, which pro- mises to be of great use in this important, but hitherto neglected, branch of physical science. The simple forms, or modifications, are three in number, and named, Cirrus, Cumulus, and Stratus. These are defined by Mr. Haward as follows : The Cirrus is composed of parallel, flexuous, or diverging fibres, extensible in any or in all directions. The Cumulus, convex or conical, heaps, increasing upwards from a horizontal base. The Stratus, is a widely extended, continuous, horizontal sheet, increasing from below. The intermediate modifications are four in number, each of which is formed from various combinations of the simple modifications just mentioned. They are the Cirro-cumulus, the Cirro-stratus, the Cu- mulo-stratus, and the Cumulo-cirro-stratus, or Nimbus ; and are de- fined as follows. Cirro-cumulus. Small well-defined roundish masses, in close hori- zontal arrangement. Cirro-stratus. Horizontal or slightly-inclined masses, bent down- ward, or undulated, separate, or in groups consisting of a number of small clouds. Cumulo-rstratus. The cirro-stratus blended with the cumulus, and either appearing intermixed with the heaps of the latter, or super- adding a wide-spread structure to its base. Cumulo-cirro-stratus. The rain cloud. A cloud, or system of clouds, from which rain is falling. It is a horizontal sheet, above which the cirrus spreads, while the cumulus enters it laterally, and from beneath. OF THE CIRRUS. Clouds in this modification appear to have the least density, the greatest elevation, and the greatest variety of extent and direction. They are the earliest appearance after serene weather. They are first indicated by a few threads pencilled, as it were, on the sky. OF THE CLOUDS THE CIRRUS. 113 These increase in length, and new ones are in the mean time added laterally. Often the first-formed threads serve as stems to support numerous branches, which in their turn give rise to others. This modification is represented by the following figure. The increase is sometimes perfectly indeterminate, at others it has a very decided direction. Thus the first few threads being once formed, the remainder shall be propagated either in one, wo, or more directions laterally, or obliquely upward or downward, the direction being often the same in a great number of clouds visible at the same time. Their duration is uncertain, varying from a few minutes after the first appearance to an extent of many hours. It is long when they appear alone and at great heights, and shorter when they are formed lower and in the vicinity of other clouds. This modification, although in appearance almost motionless, is intimately connected with the variable motions of the atmosphere. Considering that clouds of this kind have long been deemed a prog- nostic of wind, it is extraordinary that the nature of this connection should not have been more studied, as the knowledge of it might have been productive of useful results. In fair weather, with light variable breezes, the sky is seldom quite clear of small groups of the oblique cirrus, which frequently come on from the leeward, and the direction of their increase is to windward. Continued wet weather is attended with horizontal sheets of this cloud, which subside quickly and pass to the cirro- stratus. Before storms they appear lower and denser, and usually in the 114 OF THE CLOUDS THE CUMULUS. quarter opposite to that from which the storm arises. Steady high winds are also preceded and attended by streaks running quite across the sky in the direction they blow in. The relations of this modification with the state of the barometer, thermometer, hygrometer, and electrometer, have not yet been at- tended to. OF THE CUMULUS. Clouds iii this modification are commonly of the most dense structure : they are formed in the lower atmosphere, and move along with the current which is next the earth. A small irregular spot first appears, and is, as it were, the nucleus on which they increase. The lower surface continues irregularly plane, while the upper rises into conical or hemispherical heaps; which may afterwards continue long nearly of the same bulk, or ra- pidly rise to mountains, as represented by the following figure. In the former case they are usually numerous and near together, in the latter few and distant; but whether there are few or many, their bases always lie nearly in one horizontal plane, and their in- crease upward is somewhat proportionate to the extent of base, and nearly alike in many that appear at once. Their appearance, increase, and disappearance, in fair weather, are often periodical, and keep pace with the temperature of the day. Thus they will begin to form some hours after sun-rise, arrive at their maximum in the hottest part of the afternoon, then go on dimi' nishing, and totally disperse about sun-set. But in changable weather they paitake of the vicissitudes of the atmosphere; sometimes evaporating almost as soon as formed, at others suddenly forming and as quickly passing to the compound modifications. The cumulus of fair weather has a moderate elevation and extent, and a well defined rounded surface. Previous to rain it increases more rapidly, appears lower in the atmosphere, and with its surface full of loose fleeces or protuberances. OF THE CLOUBS THT STRATUS. Independently of the beauty and magnificence it adds to the face of nature, the cumulus serves to screen the earth from the direct rays of the sun, by its multiplied reflections to diffuse, and, as it were, eco- nomise the light, and also to convey the product of evaporation to a distance from the place of its origin. The relations of the cumulus with the state of the barometer, &c. have not yet been sufficiently attended to. The formation of large cumuli to leeward in a strong wind, indicates the approach of a calm with rain. When they do not disappear or subside about sun-set, but continue to rise, thunder is to be expected in the night. - OF THE STRATUS. . This modification has a mean degree of density. It is the lowest of clouds, since its inferior surface commonly rests on the earth or water, as represented by the following figure. Contrary to the last, which may be considered as belonging to the day, this is properly the cloud of night; the time of its first appear- ance being about sun-set. It comprehends ail those creeping mists which in calm evenings ascend in spreading sheets (like an inundation of water) from the bottom of valleys and the surface of lakes, rivers, &c. Its duration is frequently through the night. On the return of the sun the level surface of this cloud begins to put on the appearance of cumulus, the whole at the same time sepa- rating from the ground. The continuity is next destroyed, and the cloud ascends and evaporates, or passes off with the appearance of the nascent cumulus. This has been long experienced as a prognostic of fair weather, and indeed there is none more serene than that which is ushered in by it. The relation of the stratus to the state of the atmosphere as indi- cated by the barometer, &c. appears notwithstanding to have passed hitherto without much attention. 1,6 OF THE CLOUDS THE CIRRO-CUMULUS. OF THE CIRRO-CUMULUS. The cirrus having continued for some time increasing or stationary, usually passes either to the cirro-cumulus or the cirro-stratus, at the same time descending to a lower station in the atmosphere. The cirro-cumulus is formed from a cirrus, or from a number of small separate cirri, by the fibres collapsing as it were, and passing into small roundish masses, in which the texture of the cirrus is no longer discernible, although they still retain somewhat of the same relative arrangement, as exhibited by the following figure. This change takes place either throughout the whole mass at once, or progressively from one extremity to the other. In either case, the same effect is produced on a number or adjacent cirri at the same time and in the same order. It appears in some instances to be ac- celerated by the approach of other clouds. This modification forms a very beautiful sky, sometimes exhibiting numerous distinct beds of these small connected clouds, floating at different altitudes. The cirro-cumulus is frequent in summer, and is attendant on warm and dry weather. It is also occasionally and more sparingly seen in the intervals of showers, and in winter. The following passage is beautifully descriptive of the appearance of this modification by moonlight : For yet above these wafted clouds are seen (In a remoter sky, still more serene) Others, detached in ranges through the air, Spotless as snow, and countless as they're fair ; Scattered immensely wide from east to west, The beauteous semblance of a flock at rest. These to the raptur'd mind aloud proclaim Their mighty shepherd's everlasting name. RLOOMFIELIK It may either evaporate or pass to the cirrus or cirro-stratus. THE CLOUDS THE CUMULO-STRATtfS. 117 OF THE CIRRO-STRATUS. This cloud appears to result from the subsidence of the fibres of the cirrus to a horizontal position, at the same time that they approach towards each other laterally. The form and relative position, when seen in the distance, frequently give the idea of shoals of fish. Yet in this, as in other instances, the structure must be attended to rather than the form, which varies much, presenting at other times the ap- pearance of parallel bars, interwoven streaks like the grain'of polished wood, &c. It is always thickest in the middle, or at one extremity, and extenuated towards the edge, as represented by the following figure. The distinct appearance of a cirrus does not always precede the production of this and the last modification. The cirro-stratus precedes wind and rain, the near or distant approach of which may sometimes be estimated from its greater or less abun- dance and permanence. It is almost always to be seen in the inter- vals of storms. Sometimes this and the cirro-cumulus appear together in the sky, and even alternate with each other in the same cloud, when the different evolutions which ensue are a curious spectacle, and a judgment may be formed of the weather likely to ensue by ob- serving which modification prevails at last. The cirro-stratus is the modification which most frequently and completely exhibits the phe- nomena of the solar and lunar halo, and (as supposed from a few observations) the parhelion and paraselene also. Hence the reason of the prognostic for foul weather, commonly drawn from the appear- ance of the halo. OF THE CUMULO-STRATUS. The different modifications which have been just treated of some- times gives place to each other, at other times two or more appear in 118 OF THE CLOUDS THE CUMULO STRATUS. the same sky; but in this case the clouds in the same modification lie mostly m the same plane of elevation, those which are more elevated appearing through the intervals of the lower, or the latter showing dark against the lighter ones above them. When the cumulus in- creases rapidly, a cirro-stratus is frequently seen to form around its summit, reposing thereon as on a mountain, while the former cloud continues discernible in some degree through it. This state conti- nues but a short time. The cirro-stratus speedily becomes denser and spreads, while the superior part of the cumulus extends itself and passes into it, the base continuing as before, and the convex protube- rances changing their position till they present themselves laterally and downward. These are well represented by the following figure More rarely the cumulus alone performs this evolution, and its superior part constitutes the incumbent cirro-stratus Cither case a large lofty dense cloud is formed, which may be -ompared to a mushroom with a very thick short stem. But when a whole sky is crowded with this modification, the appearances are more mdistmct. The cumulus rises through the interstices of the superior clouds, and the whole, seen as it passes off in the distant ho- ori presents to the fancy mountains covered with snow, intersected with darker ridges and lakes of water, rocks and towers, &c The earanceof ^" S fl tratUS " ^ ^ ? inteFVaI bet ^^n the first ap- .e of the fleecy cumulus and the commencement of rain, while B lower atmosphere is yet too dry; also during the approach of Sffi St0rmS : i he l ndistinCt a PP earance of it is chiefly in the longer or shorter intervals of showers of rain, snow, or hail The cumulo-stratus chiefly affects a mean state of the atmosphere i to pressure and temperature ; but in this respect, like the other modifications, it affords much room for future observation OF THE NIMBUS, OR CUMULO-CIRRO-STRATUS. 119 OF THE NIMBUS, OR CUMULO-CIRRO-STRATUS. Clouds in any one of the preceding modifications, at the same degree of elevation, or in two or more of them, at different elevations, may increase so as completely to obscure the sky, and at times put on an appearance of density which to the inexperienced observer indicates the speedy commencement of rain. It is nevertheless extremely pro- bable, as well from attentive observation as from a consideration of the several modes of their production, that the clouds, while in any one of these states, do not at any time let fall rain. Before this effect takes place they have been uniformly found to un- dergo a change, attended with appearances sufficiently remarkable to constitute a distinct modification, which is represented by the follow- ing figure, called the Nimbus, or Cumulo-cirro-stratus cloud. In this figure a shower is represented as coming from behind an elevated point of land. The nimbus, although in itself one of the least beautiful clouds, is yet now and then superbly decorated with its attendant the rainbow ; which can only be seen in perfection when backed by the widely ex- tended uniform gloom of this modification. The relations of rain, and of periodical showers more especially, with the varying temperature, density, and electricity of the atmos- phere, will probably now obtain a fuller investigation, and with a better prospect of success, than heretofore. 120 MOTIONS OF THE EARTH MOTIONS OF THE EARTH. She from the West her silent course advances With inoffensive pace, that spinning sleeps On her soft axle ; while she paces even, And bears us soft with the smooth air along. MILTON. "When we consider the apparent diurnal motion of all the celestial bodies, we cannot but recognise the existence of one general cause, which produces this appearance. But when we consider that these bodies are not only at different distances from the earth, but at dif- ferent distances from each other, and that these distances are not always the same, we shall find it difficult to conceive that it is the same cause that produces this appearance on all of them. The difficulty, however, becomes considerably less when it is recollected, that a person in motion, looking at an object at rest, per- ceives the same change of position in the object as if he were himself at rest, and the object in motion in the opposite direction. Every one who has looked, for the first time, from the window of a carriage moving quickly along the road ; or from the deck of a ship sailing smoothly along the shore ; fancies that every thing which the carriage or vessel passes is in motion, and that he is himself at rest. An appearance still more deceiving takes place, when a person looks out of the cabin window of a ship, in a dark night, at a distant light apparently in motion. For the change of place in the light may arise either from its being really in motion, or on board of another vessel, while the vessel in which the spectator is placed is at anchor; or the light may be stationary, and its apparent motion occasioned by the motion of the ship which carries the spectator; or it may even be occasioned by the motion of the vessel which carries the light being quicker or slower than the one which carries the spectator. The difficulty in determining to which of these causes the motion of the light is to be attributed, arises from the want of some intervening object whose state is known, and by which the apparent motion may be compared. Now this is precisely the situation in which we stand with regard to the heavenly bodies. For the motion of the earth on its axis, if it really has such a motion, must be incomparably smoother than any vessel or machine made by human art ; and as there is no fixed intermediate object between it and the heavenly bodies, no direct proof of this motion can be obtained. As far, then, as appearances enable us to judge, either the earth may be at rest, and the heavens carried round it every twenty-four hours, or the heavens may be at rest, and the earth revolve round its axis, in the same time. For the rising and setting of the sun and stars, with all the other celestial phenomena, will be presented in the same order whether the heavens revolve round the earth, or the earth round its axis. However, on comparing these appearances with others which are more within our reach, and with the established laws of motion, we MOTIONS OF THE EARTH. 121 shall find it is much more probable they are occasioned by the revo-" iution of the earth on its axis, than the revolution of the whole heavens. For as the heavenly bodies present the same appearances to us, whether the firmament carries them round the earth, or the earth itself revolves in a contrary direction, it seems much more natural to admit the latter hypothesis than the former, and to regard the motion of the heavens as only apparent. The semidiameter of the earth is only about 4000 miles, and conse- quently its circumference is about 25,000 miles. This is, therefore, the space every point of its equator must pass through, if the earth revolves on its axis, which is little more than 1000 miles per hour, or about 17 miles per minute. This velocity is certainly very considerable, being nearly equal to that of a cannon- ball when it leaves the mouth of a cannon ; but it becomes totally insignificant when compared with the motion of some of the heavenly bodies, required on the other supposition. The distance of the sun from the earth is about ninety-five millions of miles ; * and therefore if he revolves round the earth in twenty -four hours, he must pass over more than six times this space in the same time, and consequently must move at the rate of about.25,000,000 miles per hour, which is more than 20,000 times quicker than a cannon-ball. The planet Uranus is about twenty times farther distant from the earth than the sun, and consequently the velocity of its daily motion must be twenty times greater, f But although these velocities are sufficient to startle the imagination, they are really nothing when compared to the ra- pidity with which the fixed stars must move to accomplish a revolution round the earth in twenty-four hours. If the distance of the fixed stars be assumed at 200,000 times the distance of the sun from the earth,; they must move over the space of 1,400,000,000 miles per second, in order to complete a rovolution round the earth in twenty- four hours ! This is a degree of velocity of which we can have no kind of conception ; and yet, if we consider the velocity which those stars must have that are many thousands of times more distant from the earth, it must be almost infinitely greater. If we, therefore, take into consideration the number of bodies that must move, arid the pro- digious rapidity of their motions, to produce the same appearances which the revolution of one body, with a comparatively moderate velocity, can produce, we shall scarcely hesitate a moment in con- cluding that the motion of this one body is the true cause of these appearances. This conclusion must appear still more obvious when we attend to the comparative bulk of these different bodies. Of the planets which belong to the solar system, three of them are known to be much greater than the earth ; Jupiter being nearly fifteen hundred times ; Saturn nine hundred times; and Uranus eighty times. But the sun exceeds them all in magnitude, being considerably more than a mil- lion of times greater than the earth. Our ignorance of the real dis- tances of the fixed stars prevents us fiorn ascertaining correctly their * See page 26. f Page 40. J Page 83. 11 M MOTIONS OF THE EARTH. real magnitudes; bat, from what we know of their distances, we are entitled to conclude that they are at least equal in size to the largest of the planets. If such, therefore, be the magnitude of these bodies, how inconsistent would it be with every idea of order and arrange- ment to suppose, that such a vast number of immense bodies daily revolve round such a little and comparatively insignificant body as the earth ! What extraordinary power would be necessary to retain them in their orbits, and counterbalance the amazing centrifugal force which they must possess ! The idea, too, of so many immense and independent bodies, so vastly distant from the earth and from each other, performing their revolutions round this little ball, exactly in the same number of seconds, is scarcely to be entertained for a single moment : all the phenomena, especially when supposed to arise from these revolutions, can be satisfactorily and easily accounted for, by supposing the earth to revolve oft its axis. If we suppose the planets to be carried round the earth, from east to west, every twenty-four hours, and also allow them a motion pecu- liar to themselves from west to east (which they are observed to have), we produce such a combination of opposite motions, as has never yet been observed in any of the heavenly bodies, and which it would be impossible to reconcile with any of the known principles of mechanics. But the rotation of a body on its axis, combined with a motion in its curvilineal orbit, is what we are quite familiar with, and what is exhibited by a school-boy by spinning his top. But one of the strongest proofs of the rotation of the earth is its figure. For it is now well known tlmt the earth is not a perfect sphere ; its polar diameter being considerably less than its equatorial.* It is also known that this is the shape which a spherical body would in time assume, if it revolved on a fixed axis ; and therefore it is rea- sonable to conclude that the spheroidical figure of the earth is occa- sioned by its rotatory motion. This conclusion is supported by the extraordinary fact, that the difference between the polar and equato- rial axis of the earth, as deduced from theory alone, is nearly the same as from actual measurement of various arcs of meridian circles. The same conclusion is farther supported by analogy. A rotatory motion has been observed in several of the other pla- nets, and from west to east, the direction in which the earth must revolve in order to occasion the apparent diurnal motion of the heavens from east to west. Jupiter, a much larger body than the earth, turns round his axis in less than twelve hours. Now both the earth and Jupiter are known to be flattened at the poles. All these facts, therefore, lead us to conclude that the eartli has really a motion of rotation, and that the diurnal motion of the heavens is only an illusion produced by this rotation. The diurnal rotation of the earth being assented to, its annual motion will scarcely be denied ; for its similarity to the other planets * Some of the objections which have been stated against the rotation of the earith will be noticed in treating of the Ptolemaic and Tychonic systems. MOTIONS OF THE EARTH. 123 is considerably strengthened by this circumstance. For the planets being found to revolve on their axis, and to be flattened at the poles like the earth ; and being found to have periodical revolutions from west to east, we are led to suppose, that the earth has a similar revo- lution, in order to render the analogy between it and the rest of the planets complete. But the appearances afford us as little assistance in ascertaining the truth of this supposition, as in the case of the diurnal motion ; for whether we suppose the earth to be at rest and the sun to move round it in the ecliptic in the course of a year, or the sun to be at rest and the earth to describe this path in the same time ; the phenomena of the seasons, eclipses, and all other appearances connected with the sun's annual motion, may be explained on either hypothesis. But, although this be the case, it is much more pro- bable that these appearances are produced by the annual motion of the earth round the sun, than by the motion of the sun round the earth. For by supposing the earth to move round the sun, we not only give order and simplicity to the solar system, and preserve the analogy, which is so conspicuous among the other bodies which com- pose that system, but we remove several difficulties which unavoidably attend the opposite hypothesis. It has already been remarked, that the earth is considerably smaller than several of the other planets, and that it is about fourteen hundred thousand times less than the sun; it is therefore quite inconsistent with every idea of order aud arrangement to suppose, that bodies of such extraordinary size should revolve round one of comparatively small magni- tude. For, independent of the complication of the planetary motions which such a supposition would introduce, it would overthrow one of the best established principles of mechanics and is quite inconsist- ent with the law which is known to subsist between the times of the revolutions of the planets, and their distance from the sun. For tjhe farther they are from the sun, their motion is the slower. Their periodic times of revolution being to each other as the cubes of their mean distances from the sun. Now according to this remark- able law, the length of a revolution of the earth round the sun, should be exactly a sidereal year. This is therefore an incontestible proof that the earth moves round the sun, like the other planets, and is sub- ject to the same laws. To this we may add, that the aspects of increase and decrease of the planets, the times of their seeming to stand still, and move direct and retrograde, answer precisely with the motion of the earth : but cannot be reconciled with that of the sun, without introducing the most absurd and monstrous suppositions, which would destroy all order, harmony, and simplicity, in the system. But the most direct proof of the earth's annual motion is derived from the aberration of light. For during the time which light takes to pass over the semidiameter of the earth's orbit, which is 8' 13", the earth ought to move 20"-232 in its orbit, and this is found by observations to be actually the case. M 124 MOTIONS OF THE EARTH. The annual as well as the diurnal motion of the earth may there- fore be considered as completely established. The objections which have been urged against these motions, by the supporters of the Pto- lemaic and Tychonic systems of the heavens, will be noticed when treating of these systems. To the texts of Scripture which seem to contradict the motion ot the earth, the following reply may be made to them all. That it is plain from many instances, that the Scriptures were never designed to instruct men in philosophy, but in matters of religion, and are not always to be taken in the literal sense. For Job describes the earth as being supported upon pillars, and in another place as being hung upon nothing ; and Moses calls the moon a great luminary, although it is well known to be an opaque body, which shines only by reflecting the light of the sun. It is perfectly certain these expressions were not meant to convey any astronomical opinion; but employed because they would be easily understood by those to whom they were immediately addressed. In familiar discourse, astronomers themselves speak of the sun's place in the ecliptic, of his rising and setting, &c. ; for if they did not, they would be under the necessity of explaining their meaning every time they had occasion to mention those appearances to those who knew nothing of astronomy. The poet Thomson, though perfectly well convinced of the annual motion of the earth, says At last from Aries rolls the bounteous sun, And the bright Bull receives him. And Baker, in his elegant and truly philosophical poem, entitled the " Universe," says Along the skies the sun obliquely rolls, Forsakes, by turns, and visits both the poles. Diff 'rent his tract, but constant his career, Divides the times, and measures out the year. To climes returns where freezing winter reigns, Unbinds the glebe, and fructifies the plains; The crackling ice dissolves ; the rivers flow ; Vines crown the mountain-tops, and corn the vales below. BAKER. ON THE CHANGE OF SEASONS. 125 ON THE CHANGE OF SEASONS.* At one wide view God's eye surveys His works in every distant clime ; He shifts the seasons, months, and days, The short-lived offspring of revolving time ; By turns they die, by turns are born. Now cheerful Spring the circle leads, And strews with flowers the smiling meads ; Gay Summer next, whom russet robes adorn, And waving fields of yellow corn ; Then Autumn, who with lavish stores the lap of Nature spreads. Decrepid Winter, laggard in the dance, (Like feeble age opprest with pain) A heavy season does maintain, With driving snows, and winds, and rain, Till Spring, recruited to advance, The various years rolls round again. HUGHES. The earth's rotation makes the night and day ; The sun revolving through th' ecliptic way, Effects the various seasons of the year. BLACKMORI;. The alternate succession of day and night, as well as the variety of seasons, depend entirely on the motions of the earth. For if the sun and the earth were perfectly at rest with respect to each other, it is evident that one half of the earth would always be in the light, and the other half in darkness, as the sun can only enlighten one half of its surface at a time. But as the earth turns round its axis once in twenty-four hours, any particular place on its surface will pass through light and darkness alternately. As long as it continues in the en r lightened hemisphere, it will be day at that place ; but while it passes through the opposite hemisphere, it will be night. But although the regular succession of day and night be occasioned by the diurnal revolution of the earth on its axis, yet this motion is not of itself sufficient to produce that variety in the lengths of days and nights, which the various places of the earth experience in the course of a year. For should it revolve on its axis, with one of its poles always pointed exactly to the sun, one half of the earth would be constantly in the light and the other half in darkness, notwithstanding its rota- tion. Again, if we suppose the earth to turn on its axis, with its equator directly pointed to the sun, then the light would just reach both poles, consequently all places would be in light and darkness alternately, and the days and nights would be exactly twelve hours each at every part of the globe. If either extremities of the earth's axis, suppose the northern, were to make an acute angle with an imaginary line joining the centre of * If a terrestrial globe be placed in the various positions mentioned in this article, it will contribute very much to impress the mind with the true sause of the change of the seasons. 126 ON THE CHANGE OF SEASONS. the sun with any point of the earth's equator, it would follow that the north pole, and a certain tract round it, would remain always in the light, notwithstanding the revolution of the earth on its axis. Even those places in the northern hemisphere to which the sun appeared to rise and set, would have their days always longer than their nights; at the equator the days and nights would be equal ; but in the southern hemisphere the reverse would happen to what took place in the northern. For those places to which the sun appeared to rise and set would have their nights longer than their days ; and the south pole would be constantly in darkness, with a tract around it equal to what was constantly in the light round the north pole. It is evident, also, that in this case the sun would be always on the north side of the equator, and vertical to a certain circle parallel to it, which would be as many degrees from the equator as the angle contained between the earth's axis and the imaginary line wanted of a right angle. This last supposition is in some degree similar to what actually takes place in nature; for the axis of the earth makes an angle of 23^ degrees, with a perpendicular to its orbit ; and as the axis always remains parallel to itself, or points in the same direction, this angle must be constantly changing as the earth moves forward in its orbit.* Some say he bid his angels turn askance The poles of earth twice ten degrees and more From the sun's axle ; they with labour push'd Oblique the central globe. MILTON. This is well represented by the following figure, which shews the earth in twelve different positions, or at twelve different times of the year. The line # b is the equator, n the north pole, and * the south. The signs of ^, ~, &c. denote the points of the ecliptic in which the earth is when it has the positions in the figure. * Or, what amounts to the same thing, the axis of the earth makes au angle with the plane of the ecliptic of 664 degrees. ON THE CHANGE OF SEASONS. 127 As the position of the poles of the earth, with respect to the sun, depends entirely on this angle, their position must always be chang- ing; and, of course, every point on the earth's surface must also alter its position with respect to the sun. About the 20th of March, when the sun, as seen from the earth, enters the sign Aries, the line supposed to join the centres of the earth and sun is perpendicular to the earth's axis ; consequently both poles are similarly situated with respect to the sun, as he is then directly over the equator, and the days and nights are equal at every place on the globe. This time of the year is called the vernal equinox, because spring commences to the inhabitants of the northern hemisphere, while autumn begins to those of the southern. After the 20th of March the sun appears to rise every day sensibly more to the northward than he did the day before, to be more elevated at mid-day, and to continue longer above the horizon, till the 21st of June, which is the longest day at all places in the northern hemis- phere. At this time the angle formed by the northern half of the earth's axis and the line joining the centre of the earth and sun is then at the least, which is 66f degrees. The sun will then appear to touch the tropic of Cancer, and be vertical to all places 23 degrees north of the equator. This time of the year is called the summer solstice, because it is the middle of summer, and the sun seems to remain stationary for a few days. After the 21st of June, the angle joining the centres of the earth and sun gradually increases, and the sun appears to recede from the tropic of Cancer, in the same manner as he advanced to it, rising every day a little farther to the south than he did the day before, till the 23 of September, when the axis has a similar position to what it had on the 20th of March, being again at right angles to the line just mentioned, consequently the days and nights are again equal all over the globe, which constitutes the autumnal equinox. The sun now appears to cross the equinoctial, and the south pole^ which, during the last six months, was in the dark, begins to turn towards the sun ; and precisely the same phenomena are exhibited to the southern hemisphere as those already described in the case of the northern half of the eartfi. On the 22d of December the sun appears to touch the tropic of Capricorn, and is vertical to all those places on the earth that are 23^ degrees south of the equator. The days are then longest at all places in the southern hemisphere, but at the shortest in the northern. This time of the year is termed the winter solstice. From the tropic of Capricorn the sun again appears to move for- ward, and to arrive at the equinoctial again on the 20th of March. Thus by a combination of the annual and diurnal motions of the earth, with the parallelism of its axis, and the obliquity of its orbit to the plane of its equator, the various seasons are produced, and the same quantity of light and darkness, in the space of a year, are dis- tributed to every region of the globe. The manner in which the sun enlightens the earth, the parallelism of its axis, and the increase and decrease of the days and nights, 128 ON THE CHANGE OF SEASONS. may be well illustrated by a small terrestrial globe, suspended by a string fastened to its north pole, as represented by the following figure. A circle of wire a b, representing the plane of the earth's equator, may be held parallel to a table, and equal in height with the flame of a candle standing upon it. If the string be twisted a little towards the left hand, and the globe suspended within the circle, with its equator at the same height, the globe will begin to turn on its axis from west to east, and day and night will be represented by the light .and shade produced by the candle on its surface. But if the globe be carried round the wire, to represent a year, the candle will illu- minate both poles, and every spot on its surface will describe half a circle in the enlightened part, and half in the dark part, and make equality of day and night through the year. This is, however, not the case in nature, as has already been fully explained. If then the wire be inclined to the table at an angle of 23* degrees, as represented by the circle abed, and the globe be carried gently round it, the seasons, and increase of day and night, will appear as they are in nature; i. e. when the globe is at , the candle enlightens it no far- ther northward than the arctic circle no; all within which, in the middle of our winter, is deprived of a sight of the sun ; while all places within the antarctic, or opposite circle, have perpetual day : at this time the candle shines vertically on the tropic of Capricorn. As the earth moves towards 6 (the vernal equinox), if a small patch be laid on latitade 51| north, it will shew how the days increase at London, and how the nights decrease. When it has arrived at b, the candle will then be perpendicularly over the equator, and, shining to both poles, equality of day and night will take place: as it proceeds towards c (the summer solstice), the days increase, and the candle shines more and more over the north pole: when it has arrived at c, ON THE CHANGE OF SEASONS. 129 the whole arctic circle, and the countries it includes, will revolve in continual sight of the sun ; and all within the antarctic circle will be deprived of that sight. At this time the candle shines vertically on the tropic of Cancer. Moving from midsummer towards d (the au- tumnal equinox), the days will be found to decrease, and the nights to increase in length, till they come again to equality at d, and thence to the winter solstice, and so on. The particular temperature which distinguishes each of the seasons, at any paiticular place, is owing to a difference in the sun's altitude, and the time of his continuance above the horizon of that place. In winter, th^ rays of the sun fall so obliquely, and the sun is such a short time above the horizon, that his influence in heating the earth is but very little, compared with what it is in summer. For at this season, the sun is so much higher than in winter, that his rays not only fall more perpendicularly, but more of them fall on any given space ; and as the day is also much longer than the night, the tem- perature of the earth and the surrounding atmosphere must be much greater than in winter. Since the power of the sun is greater in heating the earth at any particular place, when his rays fall most directly, and when the days are longest at that place, it may be asked, how does it happen that the heat is greatest about the end of July, when the sun is highest and the day longest about the 21st of June? The reason of this may easily be discovered by attending a little to the manner in which bodies are heated. The heat which the earth receives is not transient, but is retained by it for some time. For, like other solid bodies, it receives heat and parts with it gradually. Now as the earth continues to receive more heat in the day than it gives out in the night, for a considerable time after the 21st of June, its tempe- rature will continue to increase, till the days and nights begin to approach to an equality. But this is not the case till the end of July, at least; the earth goes on increasing in temperature, till about this time, when it is found to be much greater than about the 21st of June, although the sun be then higher at raid-day, and the day longer than at any other time of the year in the northern hemisphere.* The heat in July would be still greater were the sun at his mean distance from the earth ; but this is not the case, for he is then at his greatest dis- tance. However, the difference between his distance at this time and the mean distance being only 6 ^th part of the whole, it could not make a great alteration in the heating power of the rays. But if it does operate in any degree in diminishing the heat in the northern hemisphere in July, the same cause must operate in increasing the heat, but in a double degree, in the southern hemisphere in January. For the sun is ^th part nearer the earth than his mean distance ori the 1st of January. Consequently the heat must be greater in the southern hemisphere in January than in the northern in July, all other circumstances being the same. The effects of the direct in- * The same phenomena take place in the southern hemisphere in a reverse order, or at six months' difference of time. 130 ON THE PECULATION OF TIME, &c. fluence of the sun are, however, greatly modified by the transportation of the temperature of one region into another, in consequence of that disturbance in the equilibrium of the atmosphere which the action of the sun's rays necessarily produce. Thus we see by what simple means the whole variety of the sea- sons are produced; and also how admirably iitted the means are t accomplish the end. These, as they change, Almighty Father, these Are but the varied God. The rolling year Is full of Thee. Forth in the pleasing Spring Thy beauty walks, Thy tenderness and love. Wide flush the fields ; the softening air is balm ; Echo the mountains round ; the forest smiles ; And every sense, and every heart is joy. Then comes Thy glory in the Summer months, With light and heat refulgent. Then Thy sun Shoots full perfection through the swelling year : And oft Thy voice in dreadful thunder speaks j And oft at dawn, deep noon, or falling eve, By brooks, and groves, in hollow-whispering gales. Thy bounty shines in Autumn unconfin'd, And spreads a common feast for all that lives. In Winter awful Thou ! with clouds and storms Around Thee thrown, tempest o'er tempest roll'd, Majestic darkness ! on the whirlwind's wing, Riding sublime ! Thou bidst the world adore. ON THE REGULATION OF TIME BY THE HEAVENLY BODIES. Time of itself is nothing, but from thought Receives its rise ; by labouring fancy wrought From things considered, while we think on some As present, some as past, or yet to come. No thought can think on time that's still confest, But thinks on things in motion or at rest. Though time, considered in an abstract and philosophical point of view, was certainly coeval with the Deity, since nothing can possibly exist but in some portion of it, yet the measuring; of time is a matter of a very different nature; and though various nations have differed on this subject, it is, nevertheless, a subject of the utmost importance to every human being. For the opposite and contradictory me- thods of calculating time have often been productive of very great mischief in the world ; while chronologers, sometimes from igno- rance, and as often from prejudice, have misrepresented events, which, however trifling they might appear to them, may nevertheless affect the happiness of future ages. During the general chaos, or that period when the materials of which the beautiful fabric of the universe was what Ovid calls rudis indigcstaqiie moles, a rude and indigested heap, there were no human beings, and consequently no occasion for any method of measuring or regulating time. But as ON THE REGULATION OF TIME, &C. 131 soon as the world was made a fit habitation for man, the measure- ment of time became necessary on many accounts ; our pleasures as well as our interests, require that this object should be accomplished; but it is only an acquaintance with astronomy that can furnish the means of doing it correctly. For time has always been measured and defined by the motions of the heavenly bodies, and particularly by the sun, as being the most regular and constant in his apparent revolutions.* The principal divisions of time are the year and the day, which are measured by the annual and diurnal revolution of the sun. The day, or the time in which the sun appears to go round the earth, has been divided into twenty-four equal parts, which are called hours, and these again subdivided into minutes, &c. This division is, however, merely arbitrary ; there being no astronomical appearance to warrant or regulate such a division of the day, more than a division into twenty-two, forty-eight, or any other number of equal parts. The length of the tropical year, or the time the sun is in going from any point of the ecliptic to the same again, is 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 49 seconds. But the sidereal year, or the time which intervenes between the conjunction of the sun and any fixed star and his next conjunction with the same star, is 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes, 11^ seconds. The difference between these two periods, which amounts to 20' 22^", is occasioned by the recession of the equinoxes, or the falling back of the equinoctial points 50i seconds of a degree every year. This retrograde motion of the equinoctial points is caused by the joint attraction of the sun and moon upon the earth, in consequence of its spheroidical figure. f Time is distinguished according to the manner of measuring the day, into apparent, mean, and sidereal. Apparent time, which is also called true, solar, and astronomical time, is derived from observations made on the sun. Mean, or mean solar time, some- times called equated time, is a mean or average of apparent time, which is not always equal ; for the intervals between two successive transits of the sun over the meridian are not always the same. This is owing to the eccentricity of the earth's orbit, and its obliquity to the plane of the equinoctial. If the earth's orbit were an exact circle, and coincident with the equinoctial, the sun would always return to the meridian of any place at equal intervals of time, and apparent and mean solar time would be the same. But as this is not the case, mean time is deduced from apparent by adding or subtract- ing the difference between them, which is usually called the equation of time. Mean solar days are all equal, being twenty-four hours each ; but apparent solar days are sometimes more than twenty-four hours, and * As it may contribute to perspicuity in treating of this important subject, we shall consider the apparent motions of the sun as real. t These variations are computed and inserted in a table, which is called a Table of the Equation of Time. 132 ON THE REGULATION OF TIME, &C. sometimes less. A sidereal day is the interval between two succes- sive transits of a star over the same meridian, and is always of the same length ; for all the fixed stars make their revolutions in equal times, owing to the uniformity of the earth's diurnal rotation about its axis. The sidereal day is however shorter than the mean solar day by 3' 5G*". This difference arises from the sun's apparent annual motion from west to east, by which he leaves the star as it were be- hind him. Thus if the sun and a star be observed on any day to pass the meridian at the same instant, the next day, when the star passes the meridian, the sun will have advanced nearly a degree to the east- ward; and, as the earth's diurnal rotation on its axis is from west to east, the star will come to the meridian before the sun, and in the course of a year the star will have gained a whole day on the sun, that is, it will have passed the meridian 366 times while the sun will only have passed it 365 times. Now as the sun appears to perform the whole of the ecliptic in 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 49 seconds, he describes 59' 83", or nearly one degree of it per day, at a mean rate ; and this space reduced to time is exactly 3' 56^', the excess of a mean solar day above a sidereal day.* The equation of time, or the difference between mean and apparent time, as already mentioned, arises from two causes; namely, the ob- liquity of the ecliptic to the plane of the equinoctial, and the eccentri- city of the earth's orbit. There are, however, four days in the year when the equation of time is nothing, or when the mean and apparent time coincide; these days are, at present, the 15th of April, the 15th of June, the 1st of September, and the 24th of December. From the first of these days to the second, the apparent time is before the mean ; from the second to the third, the mean time is before the appa- rent; from the third to the fourth, the apparent is before the mean ; and from the last of those days to the first, the mean is again before the apparent, and so on alternately.! If the revolution of the sun consisted of an entire number of days, for instance 365, the year would naturally be made to do the same, and there would be no difficulty in the formation of the calendar, or in adjusting the reckoning in years and in days to one another. All the years would thus contain precisely the same number of days, and would also begin and end with the sun in the same point of the ecliptic. But the sun's revolution includes a fraction of a day, and therefore a year and a revolution of the sun cannot be precisely completed at the same moment. However, as this fraction makes a whole day in four revolutions, one day is added every four years, in order to make this number of years equal to the same number of re- volutions. The year to which this clay is added therefore contains 366 days. This is the arrangement of what is called the Julian Calendar, and * This excess is sometimes called the acceleration of the fixed stars, t Clocks and watches ought to be regulated by mean time, as none of them can shew apparent time, because they are all constructed on the principle of uniform and equable motion. ON THE REGULATION OF TIME, &C. 133 the year thus computed, is termed the Julian year, from Julius Caesar, by whom it was introduced at Rome.* But as the real length of the year is 365 days, 5 hours, 49 minutes, nearly, the manner of rec- koning adopted by Julius Caesar was not sufficiently exact to preserve the seasons in the same time of the year ; for in four years the dif- ference between the year thus regulated and the true solar year amounted to about 44 minutes, and in 132 years to one entire day. The Julian year must, therefore, have begun one day earlier than the solar year at the end of this period. Consequently, the continuance of this erroneous mode of reckoning would have made the seasons change their places altogether in the course of twenty-four thousand years. At the time of the Council of Nice, in the year 325 of the Christian era, the Julian calendar was introduced into the church ; and at that time the vernal equinox fell on the 21st of March ; but on account of the imperfection of the mode of reckoning just noticed, the reck- oning fell constantly behind the true time : so that in the year 1582, the Julian year had fallen nearly ten days behind the sun ; and the equinox, instead of falling on the 21st of March, fell on the llth of March. The defects of the calendar were discovered long before the year 1582 ; but all attempts made to reform it proved in vain. At last, Pope Gregory, who was desirous of rendering his pontificate illustrious by bringing about a reformation, which his predecessors had failed to accomplish, invited all the astronomers in Christendom to give their opinions on this important affair. This invitation had the effect of bringing forth many ingenious plans, but the one which he ordered to be adopted was afforded by an astronomer of Verona, named Lilius. The first step was to allow for the loss of the ten days; which was done by counting the 5th of October, 1582, the 15th of that month. By this means, the vernal equinox was again brought to the 2lst of March, as it was at the time of the Council of Nice. And to pre- vent the like inconvenience in future, it was decreed that the last year of every century, not divisible by four, should be accounted a com- mon year, which, according to the Julian reckoning, should be leap year ; but that those hundreds which were divisible by four, such as 1600, 2000, 2400, &c. should still be accounted leap year. Although this correction be sufficiently exact to keep the seasons to the same time of the year, yet it does hot altogether correspond with the real length of the year, for the time that the Julian year exceeds the true, will amount to 3 days in 390 years. If, therefore, at the end of 390 years, three days were expunged, the equinox would very nearly keep to the same day of the month ; but by suppressing 3 days * The intercalary day, or the day which was added every fourth year, was accounted the 24th of February, and. called by the Romans the 6th of the Ka- lends of March; on this account there were every fourth year two 6ths of the Kalends of March, and therefore they called this year Bissextile. With us it ii "called Leap Year. 12 N 134 OF THE TIDES. only in 400 years, as in the Gregorian account, a small deviation will take place in the course of twelve or sixteen centuries, but so trifling as scarcely to deserve notice. As this reformation of the calendar was brought about under the auspices of Pope Gregory, it is called the Gregorian Calendar, and sometimes the New Style, to distinguish it from the Julian account. This new calendar was immediately adopted in all Catholic coun- tries; but it was not adopted in this country till the year 1752. In Russia, Prussia, and some other countries, the Julian account is still used. OF THE TIDES. The ebbs of tides, and their mysterious flow, He, as art's elements, shall understand. DRYDEN. The Tides have been always found to follow, periodically, the course of the sun and moon ; and hence it has been suspected, in all ages, that the tides were, some way or other, produced by these bodies. The celebrated Kepler was the first person who formed any con- jectures respecting their true cause. But what Kepler only hinted, has been completely developed and demonstrated by Sir Isaac Newton. After his great discovery of the law of gravitation, he found it an easy matter to account for the whole phenomena of the tides : for, according to this law of nature, all the particles of matter which com- pose the universe, however remote from one another, have a continual tendency to approach each other, with a force directly proportional to the quantity of matter they contain, and inversely proportional to the square of their distance asunder. It is therefore evident, from this, that the earth will be attracted both by the sun and moon. But although the attraction of the sun greatly exceeds that of the moon, yet the sun being nearly four hundred times more distant from the earth than the moon, the difference of his attraction upon different .parts of the earth is not nearly so great as that of the moon ; and therefore the moon is the principal cause of the tides. Attractive pow'r ! whose mighty sway The Ocean's swelling waves obey, And, mounting upward, seem to raise A liquid altar to thy praise. If all parts of the earth were equally attracted by the moon, it would always retain its spherical form, and there would be no tides at all. But the action of the moon being unequal on different parts of the earth, those parts being most attracted that are nearest the moon, and those at the greatest distance least, the spherical figure must suffer some change from the moon's action. Now as the waters of the ocean directly under the moon are nearer to her than the central parts of the earth, they will be more attracted by her OF THE TIDES. 135 than the central parts. For the same reason, the central parts will be more attracted than the waters on the opposite side of the earth, and therefore the distance between the earth's centre and the waters on its surface, both under the moon and on the opposite side, will be increased ; or the waters will rise higher, and it will then be flood, or high water, at those places. But this is not the only cause that pro- duces the rise of the waters at these two points ; for those parts of the ocean which are 90 from them will be attracted with nearly the same force as the centres of the earth, the effect of which will be a small increase of their gravity towards the centre of the earth. Hence, the waters at those places will press towards the zenith and nadir, or the points where the gravity of the waters is diminished, to restore the equilibrium, and thus occasion a greater rise at those points. But in order to know the real effect of the moon on the ocean, the motion of the earth on its axis must be taken into account. For if it were not for this motion, the longest diameter of the watery spheroid would point directly to the moon's centre ; but by reason of the motion of the whole mass of the earth on its axis, from west to east, the most elevated parts of the water no longer answer precisely to the moon, but are carried considerably to the eastward in the di- rection of the rotation. The waters also continue to rise after they have passed directly under the moon, though the immediate action of the moon begins there to decrease ; and they do not reach their greatest height till they have got about 45 farther. After they have passed the point which is 90 distant from the point below the moon, they con- tinue to descend, although the force which the moon adds to their gravity begins there to decrease. For still the action of the moon adds to their gravity, and makes them descend till they have got about 45 farther; the greatest elevations, therefore, do not take take place at the points which are in a line with the centres of the earth and moon, but about half a quadrant to the east of these points, in the direction of the motion of rotation. Thus it appears, if the earth were entirely covered by the ocean, as represented by the the circle b dec in the following figure, N 2 138 OP THE TIDES. that the spheroidical form which it would assume, would be s& situated, that its longest diameter would point to the east of the moon, or the moon would always be to the west of the meridian of the parts of greatest elevation. And as the moon apparently shifts her posi- tion from east to west in going round the earth every day, the longer diameter of the spheroid following her motions will occasion two floods and two ebbs in the space of a lunar day, or 24 hours 48 min^ The moon turns Ocean in his bed From side to side, in constant ebb and flow,j And purifies from stench his wat'ry realms. YOUNG. These are the effects produced by the action of the moon only ; but the sun has also a considerable effect on the waters of the ocean, although it must be much less on account of his immense distance. For, as already observed, it is not the action of these bodies on the arth, but the inequalities of their actions which produce these effects. The sun's action on the whole mass of the earth is much greater than of the moon's ; but his distance is so great, that the dia- meter of the earth is a mere point compared with it ; and, therefore, the difference between his effects on the nearest and farthest side of the earth, becomes on this account vastly less than it would be if the sun were as near as the moon.* However, the immense bulk of the sun makes the effect still sensible^ even at so vast a distance ; and although the action of the moon has the greatest share in producing the tides, yet the action of the SUB adds sensibly to this effect, when his action is exerted in the same direction, as at the time of new and full moon, when these two bodies are nearly in the same straight line with the centre of the earth. When this is the case, the effects of these two bodies are united, so that the tides rise higher than at any other time, and are called spring tides; as represented by the follow- ing figure, where S denotes the sun, dnez the moon, and c the earth. * The mean distance of the moon from the earth is 240,000 miles OF THE TIDES. The action of the sun diminishes that of the moon in the quarters, because his action is opposed to that of the moon ; consequently, the effect must be to depress the waters where the moon's action has a tendency to raise them. These tides are considerably lower than at any other time, and are called neap tides. The spring tides do not take place on the very day of the new and full moon, nor the neap tides on the very day of the quadratures, but a day or two after; because in this case, as in some others, the effect is neither the greatest nor least when the immediate influence of the cause is greatest or least : as the greatest heat, for example, ia not on the solstitial day, when the immediate action of the sun is greatest, but some time after it. And although the action of the sun and moon were to cease, yet the ocean would continue to ebb and flow for some time, as its waves continue in violent motion for some time after a storm. The high water at a given place does not always answer to the same situation of the moon, but happens sometimes sooner and some- times later than if the moon alone acted on the ocean. This proceeds from the action of the sun not conspiring with that of the moon. The different distances of the moon from the earth also occasions a sensi- ble variation in the tides. When the moon approaches the earth, her action in every part increases, and the differences in that action, upon which the tides depend, likewise increase. For the attraction of any body is in the inverse ratio of the square of its distance; the nearer, therefore, the moon is to the earth the greater is her attraction, and the more re- mote, the less. Hence, her action on the nearest parts increases more quickly than it does on the more remote parts, and therefore the tides increase in a higher proportion as the distance of the moon diminishes. Sir Isaac Newton has shown that the tides increase as the cube of the distances decrease, so that the moon, at/ta/f her present distance, would produce a tide eight times greater. Now the moon describes an ellipse about the earth, and, of course, must be once in every revolution nearer the earth than in any other part of her orbit ; con- sequently, she must produce a much higher tide when in this point of her orbit than in the opposite point. This is the reason that two great spring tides never take place immediately after each other; for if the moon be at her least distance at the time of new moon, she must be at her greatest distance at the time of full moon, having performed half a revolution in the intervening time, and therefore the spring tide at the full will be much less than that at the preceding change. For the same reason, if a great spring tide happens at the time of full moon, the tide at the following change will be less. The spring tides are highest and the neap tides lowest about the beginning of the year; for the earth being nearest the sun about the 1st of January, must be more strongly attracted by that body than at any other time of the year : hence, the spring tides which happen about that time will be greater than at any other time. And should 138 OF THE TIDES. the moon be new or full in that part of her orbit which is nearest to the earth, at the same time the tides will b.e considerably higher than at any other time of the year. The tide which happens at any time, while the moon is above the horizon, is called the superior tide, and the other the inferior tide. "When the moon is in the equinoctial, other things remaining the same, the superior and inferior tides are of the same height ; but when the moon declines towards the elevated pole, the superior tide is higher than the inferior. If the latitude of the place and the decli- nation of the moon are of contrary names, the inferior tide will be the highest. But the highest tide at any particular place, is when the moon's declination is equal to the latitude of the place, and of the same name ; and the height of the tide diminishes, as the difference between the latitude and declination increases ; therefore, the nearer any place is to that parallel whose latitude is equal to the moon's decli- nation and of the same name, the higher will the tide be at that place.* Such would the tides regularly be if the earth were all covered over with the ocean to a great depth ; but as this is not the case, it is only at places situated on the shores of large oceans where such tides, as above described, take place. The tides are also subject to very great irregularities from local cir- cumstances; such as meeting with islands, shoals, headlands, passing through straits, &c. In order that they may have their full motion, the ocean in which they are produced ought to extend 90 from east to west, because that is the distance between the greatest elevation and the greatest depression produced in the waters by the moon. Hence it is, that the tides in the Pacific Ocean exceed those of the Atlantic, and that they are less in that part of the Atlantic which is within the torrid zone, between Africa and America, than in the tem- perate zones, on either side of it where the ocean is much broader. In the Baltic, the Mediterranean, and the Black seas, there are no sensible tides ; for they communicate with the ocean by so narrow inlets, and are of so great extent, that they cannot speedily receive and let out water enough to raise or depress their surfaces in any sensible degree. The power of the moon to raise the waters, Sir I. Newton has shown to be about 4| times that of the sun, and that the moon raises the waters 8 feet 7 inches, while the sun and moon together raise them 10^ feet, when at their mean distances from the earth, and about 12 feet when the moon is at her least distance. These heights are found to agree very well with observations onthe coasts of open and deep oceans, but not well on the coasts of small seas, and where the water is shallow. The mean retardation of the tides, or of the moon's coming to the meridian in 24 hours is 48' 45"*7, and the mean interval between two successive tides is 12 h , 25', 14"'2 ; hence, the mean daily retardation of high water is 50' 28"-4 * In comparing the height of the tides at different places, it is supposed that the sun and moon are at the same distances from the earth, and in the same posi- tion with respect to the meridian of these places. OF THE FORCES WHICH RETAIN THE PLANETS, &C. 139 About the time of new and full moon the interval is least, being only 12 h , 19', 28" ; and at the quadratures the interval is the greatest, being 12 h , 30', 7". The common method of calculating the time of high water at any place, is to multiply 50' 28", or the mean daily retardation of the tides by the moon's age, and then to divide the product by 60, which gives the mean time of the moon coming to the meridian on that day, in hours ; to this is added the time of high water on the days of full and change at the given place, and the sum is the time of high water at that place on the afternoon of the given day, if the sum be less than 12 hours; but if greater, 12 hours 25 minutes must be subtracted, in order to have the time on the afternoon of the given day ; and 25 minutes subtracted from this time will give the time of high water on the morning 6f the given day.* The following figure exhibits the progress of the tides from the Atlantic through the channels surrounding the British islands ; the lunar tides happening in any part of the shaded lines nearly at the hour after the moon's southing, which is indicated by the figure an- nexed to it. * This method is far from being exact ; but affords an approximation, which may be useful on some occasions. When accuracy is wanted recourse must be had to other methods; some of which will be given in the Supplement to this work. 140 OF THE FORCES WHICH RETAIN THE PLANETS, &C. OF THE FORCES WHICH RETAIN THE PLANETS IN THEIR ORBITS. Thine these noble works Great universal Ruler! Thy virtual energy the frame of things Pervading actuates ; as at first thy hand Diffused, through endless space this limpid sky, Vast ocean without storm, where these huge globes Sail undisturbed, a rounding voyage each ; Observant all of one unchanging law. Simplicity divine ! by this sole rule, The Maker's great establishment, these worlds Revolve harmonious, world attracting world With mutual love, and to their central sun All gravitating. MALLET. Before the time of Kepler, who flourished about the end of the l(5th century, the planets were supposed to move in circular orbits ; but since his great discovery of the laws which regulate the motions of these bodies, astronomers have been enabled to determine their periods, and the figure of their orbits, with the greatest exactness. The laws of Kepler are, 1. That all the planets move round the sun, in such a manner, that the Radius Vector, or a line joining the sun and planet, passes over equal areas or spaces of the orbit in equal portions of time. 2. That each of the primary planets describes an ellipse, having the sun in one of its foci.* 3. That the squares of the periodic times of the planets are to each other as the cubes of their mean distances from the sun. These three laws are the basis of all physical astronomy. But in a popular work like the present, it would be improper to enter upon any demonstrations of them. However, as it may, perhaps, gratify the reader to see an illustration of the third law, we shall give an example, by comparing the distance and periodic time of Mercury with those of the earth. Suppose the distance of Mercury were given, and it was required to find the time it required to perform a revolution round the sun, having the distance of the earth from the sun and the length of the year given. By the third law of Kepler it would be determined thus : As the cube of the earth's distance (95 3 millions of miles) is to -the cube of Mercury's distance (36| 3 millions), so is the square of ihe earth's periodic time (365^ 2 days) to the square of Mercury's year (88 2 days nearly). The distance may also be found by the same law, if the periodic time be known. Let it be required to find the distance of Mercury, having its periodic time given, then it would be determined thus : as 4he square of 365* days is to the square of 88 days, so is the -cube of 95 millions of miles to the cube of 36| millions of miles, * See fig. page 10. OF THE FORCES WHICH RETAIN THE PLANETS, &C. 141 the distance of Mercury from the sun. In the same way, the distance of any other planet may be determined, if its period be known, or its period if its distance be known.* After the laws of gravitation were known, it was demonstrated by Sir Isaac Newton, a priori, that the laws of Kepler must be those that regulate the system of the world. This extraordinary man found that the laws of motion, and even the general properties of matter, are the same in the heavens as on the earth. That the elliptical figure of the orbits described both by the primary and secondary planets ; the small deviations in the form and position of their orbits, as well as in the place of the planets; the facts which concern the shape, rotation, and position of their axis ; and the oscillation of the waters which surround the earth, are all explained by one principle ; namely, that of the mutual gravi- tation of all bodies with forces directly as their quantities of matter, and inversely as the squares of their distances. But as we cannot follow this celebrated philosopher in all his de- monstrations on this important subject, in a work of this kind, we shall endeavour to give as clear and comprehensive a view of the doctrine of gravitation, as our limits will permit, at the same time avoiding every thing abstruse. Thus, if one body contain double the quantity of matter that another contains, its attractive power will also be double ; if it contain ten, times the quantity of matter, its attractive power will be ten times greater, and so on. But if a body be placed at any distance from another body, and then removed to double the distance, it will attract it only with a fourth part of the force it did before; at three times the distance, with a ninth part of the force ; and at four times the distance only with a sixteenth part, and so on. These are termed the laws of gravitation ; and are known to affect every species of matter, and to connect the most distant bodies in the universe. But what the power or principle is which causes bodies to affect each other according to these laws, we shall not attempt to enquire. Because any enquiry of this kind is not likely to be at^ tended with much success; nor is it necessary to know the cause which produces these effects : for all that the astronomer is concerned to know is, whether such a power or force is exerted by one body ore another, and if it is, what are the laws of its action. Now both of these important facts have been determined with the greatest preci- sion, not only by calculation, but by observation and experiment. Every person knows that a heavy body dropped from any height above the earth's surface descends in a straight line towards the centre of the earth, where the whole force of gravity seems to be accumulated. And although it be difficult to discover any sensible change in the intensity of this force by a direct experiment on the weight of a body, on account of the distances to which we can either * In order to perform the calculation in this example, it is necessary to be ac- quainted with proportion, and the method of extracting the square arid cube roots. 142 OF THE FORCES WHICH RETAIN THE PLANETS, &C. ascend or descend from the earth's surface being so small ; yet the experiments which have been made with the pendulum, lead us to infer, that the force of gravity diminishes as we recede from the centre of the earth, at the rate we have stated above, namely, as the square of the distance increases. The effect of terrestrial gravity, as exhibited in the descent of falling bodies, has been accurately mea- sured, and the law which it observes fully ascertained and confirmed. It had been long known that falling bodies acquire an increase of velocity as they approach the earth ; and consequently that they pass over a greater space in any given time. But Galileo was the first person who made known the law which regulates their descent, which is as follows. When a body falls freely from a state of rest, it passes through the space of sixteen feet one inch in the first second of time ; and at the end of the first second it will have acquired such a degree of velocity as would carry it thirty-two feet two inches in the next second, though it should acquire no new impulse from gravity. But as the same accelerating cause continues constantly to act, it will move sixteen feet and one inch more the next second ; consequently at the end of two seconds it will have fallen sixty-four feet four inches, and acquired such a velocity as would, in the next second, carry it over forty-eight feet, although it received no new impulse, and so on. If a body b'e projected perpendicularly upwards, its motion is continually retarded by the same cause which accele- rates it in descending. But if it be projected in a direction different from the vertical line, that direction will be continually varying, and a curved line will be described in consquence of the incessant power of gravity, which, in such cases, is measured by the degree of curva- ture of the line described by the body. This phenomenon affords a very good illustration of the theory of the planetary motions; for the effect produced is perfectly analogous to the motion of a planet in its orbit. Every person knows that the greater the velocity with which any body is thrown, in a horizontal direction, from an engine, the further will it range before it falls. And though a body cannot be thrown to a very great distance on the earth, yet we can conceive a body projected with such a velocity as to carry it quite round the earth without touching it, and to continue to circulate round it in the same path with undiminished velocity, in every respect as the moon does. By reasoning in this manner, Sir Isaac Newton conceived, that the force that produces pressure in a body that is supported, or that causes a heavy body to fall to the ground, or a body thrown obliquely in the air, to describe a curvi- lineal path, might perhaps be the same that retains the moon in her orbit ; and makes the planets and comets revolve round the sun. Though this was at first only a plausible conjecture, yet, upon an appeal to the phenomena exhibited by these bodies, he was enabled to verify this conjecture. It was, however, a fortunate circumstance for science, as well as for Newton, that the real motions of the heavenly bodies, as well as the laws of Kepler, were known before he undertook the investigation of this subject. For these laws were not only the basis upon which OF THE QUANTITY OF MATTER IN THE SUN, &C. 143 he founded his investigations, but they suggested to him the manner of conducting them. The first law, for example, led him to the important discovery, that the action of a force always directed towards the sun bends the path of each planet into a curve; and the second law not only led him to the knowledge of the changes produced in the intensity of this force, by distance, but to the law which regulates the intensity. And as it was previously known that the planets move round the sun in elliptical orbits, he was enabled to establish this important law, that the force by which a planet describes areas proportional to the times round the focus of its elliptical orbit, is inversely as the square of the distance from that focus. Hence it follows, that each planet is under the influence of a force directed towards the sun, and urging it in that direction, and that the intensity of this force is inversely proportional to the square of the planet's distance from the sun. This power or force is sometimes called the centripetal force ; be- cause it urges the planet in the direction of the centre of its orbit, and prevents it from flying off in a straight line, which every body moving in a curve has a tendency to do ; and that force by which it is urged in a straight line, or endeavours to fly off from the centre, is called the centrifugal force. It is by the nice combination of these two forces, that the whole solar system is preserved in the order in which we behold it, and that every body which forms any part of the whole, performs its revolution round the common centre of the system. If the projectile or centrifugal force that urges the planets forward in their orbits were destroyed, each of them would fall to the sun, by the force of gravity, just as a stone descends to the earth. The time in which the different planets would fall to the sun, from a state of rest, by the action of the centripetal force, or the power of gravity, is as follows: Mercury, in 15 days 13 hours; Venus, 39 days 17 hours; the Earth, 64 days 13 hours; Mars, 121 days 10 hours ; Jupiter, 765 days 19 hours ; Saturn, 1901 days ; Uranus, 5425 days ; and the Moon to the earth, in 4 days 20 hours. As the centripetal force or attractive power of the sun increases, as the square of the distance decreases, it is obvious that the nearer any body is to the sun, the more powerfully will it be attracted by him. This not only accounts for the planets which are nearest the sun moving faster in their orbits than those that are most remote from him ; but also for the motion of a planet being quickest in that part of its orbit which is nearest the sun, and slowest in that part which is farthest distant from him.* For the centrifugal force must always be equal to the centripetal, in order that the planet may continue to revolve in the same orbit. In this manner, all the bodies which com- pose the solar system are attracted by the sun, and made to perform their revolutions round him ; and as action, and re-action are equal, and in opposite directions, the sun is equally attracted by all the bodies that revolve round him. Hence the order and regularity of the whole system is preserved. J* See page 10. 144 OF THE QUANTITY OF MATTER IN THE SUN, &C. As neither our limits nor the nature of the present work will permit us to give a particular account of the planetary disturbances, or the effect which they have on each other, we shall conclude the present article by mentioning the discoveries which have been the result of the investigations of astronomers on this intricate subject. These may be reduced to the two following ; viz. 1st. That all the inequa- lities produced by the mutual action of the planets are periodical; that is, after a certain time they all run through the whole series of changes to which they are subject. 2d. That amid all these changes, two of their elements remain the same the greater axis of the orbit, and the periodic time. Hence, the mean motion of a planet, and its mean distance are constant quantities. For these important disco- veries we are indebted to the celebrated French mathematicians, La Grange and La Place. And, as the late Professor Playfair has observed, they have made known to us one of the most important truths in Physical Astronomy ; namely, that the system is stable ; that it does not involve any principle of destruction in itself; but is calculated to endure for ever, unless the action of an external power be introduced; OF THE QUANTITY OF MATTER IN THE SUN AND PLANETS, AND THE FORCE OF GRAVITY AT THEIR SURFACES. On first view, it almont appears impossible to determine the res- pective masses of the sun and planets, and to measure the height ironi which bodies fall in a given time, by the action of gravity at their surfaces. But the connection of facts with each other, often leads to results which appear inaccessible, when the principle on which they depend is unknown. It was, therefore, perfectly natural even for astronomers to consi- der it impossible to determine the intensity of gravity at the surface of the planets, while the principle of universal gravitation remained unknown;* and it is just as natural for those who are unacquainted with mathematics and astronomy to consider the same thing impos- sible, even although they have heard of such a principle as universal gravitation. We shall, therefore, state what has been the result of the calculations of some of the first-rate astronomers of the present day on this curious and interesting subject. From the fact that action is always accompanied by re-action, astronomers conclude, that gravitation among terrestrial bodies, is the mutual tendency of the particles of matter to one another. And, from analogy, they think it perfectly reasonable to suppose, that this is true in all cases ; and that the force of gravitation towards different * It was this discovery which rendered it practicable to measure the intensity of gravity at the surfaces of the planets. OF THE QUANTITY OF MATTER IN THE SUN, &C. 145 bodies, the distance being the same, is proportional to the quantities of matter, or the masses of the bodies. This supposition is the foundation of ail the calculations respecting the masses of the planets ; and from it formulas have been deduced for calculating the relative quantity of matter in such of the primary planets as have satellites revolving round them ; but the quantity of matter in those that have no satellites can only be guessed at by the effect they produce in disturbing the motions of the other planets.* The quantity of matter in the moon, however, may be determined by comparing its influence with that of the sun in producing the tides, and the precession of the equinoxes. By these means it has been ascertained, that the mass of the moon is about -^th part of that of the earth. And La Place, in his Mecanique Celeste, has de- termined the quantity of matter in each of the primary planets, front the most exact data, to be as follows : Quantity of matter in the Sun ..... 1 Mercur Y ......... The Earth Marc ......... TTTBT'TTS Saturn .......... TJranusf .......... The masses of the planets being known, and their bulks being also known, their densities are easily determined, for these are propor- tional to the masses divided by the bulks. La Place, taking the mean density of the sun as unity, finds the density of such planets as have satellites to be as follows : The Earth, 3-9395; Jupiter, 0-8601; Saturn, 0-4951; Uranus, 1-1370. Knowing the masses of the planets, and their diameters, the force of gravity at their surface maybe determined; for, supposing them to be spherical, and to have no rotation on their axis, the force with which a body placed on their surface gravitates to them, will be pro- portional to their masses divided by the squares of their diameters. From the masses of Jupiter and the Earth, La Place calculates that a body which weighs one pound at the earth's equator, if carried to Jupiter's equator would weigh 2J pounds, supposing these bodies to have no rotation, and supposing the weights to be measured by the pressure exerted in the two situations. If the same body were carried to the surface of the sun, it would weigh about 27 J pounds; from which it follows, that a heavy body would there descend about 444 feet in the first second of time. * The quantities of matter in any two primary planets are directly as the cubes of the mean distances at which their satellites revolve, and inversely as the squares of their periodic times. t By adding these fractions together it will be found that the quantity of matter in all the planets together is not j l 5 th part of the matter in the sun ! 13 O 146 OF THE PRINCIPAL SYSTEMS OF ASTRONOMY, &C, Although all the planets gravitate to the sun, yet the centre of the surt is not the centre of gravity of the whole solar system. The> centre of the sun is, however, never distant from that point so much as his own diameter, consequently the centre of gravity of the whole system is always within the body of the sun. But as this point and the centre of the sun do not coincide exactly, and as the gravitation of the planets to the sun must be accompanied by the gravitation of the sun to the planets, from the quality of action and re-action, it follows that the sun must have a motion in a small orbit round the centre of gravity of the whole system. The form of this orbit is, however, very complicated, on account of the disturbing forces of so many planets, which are sometimes exerted toward one side and sometimes toward another; and even unequally exerted on different sides at the same time, according to the situation of the planets in their orbits. Thus we see the extraordinary and universal principle called gravi- tation has not only been the means of making us acquainted with a great number of inequalities in the motion of the heavenly bodies, which it would have been impossible to have discovered by observa- tion, but it has furnished us with the means of subjecting these motions to precise and certain rules. The motion of the earth, which had obtained the assent of astro- nomers, on account of the simplicity with which it explained the celestial phenomena, has received a new confirmation, which has carried it to the highest degree of evidence of which physical science is susceptible. Without the knowledge of this universal principle, the ellipticity of the planetary orbits ; the laws which the planets and comets obey in their revolution round the sun ; their secular and periodical inequalities; the numberless inequalities of the moon, and the satellites of Jupiter; the precession of the equinoxes ; the nutation of the earth's axis ; the motions of the lunar axis ; and the ebbing and flowing of the sea, would only be insulated facts, and unconnected phenomena. It is, therefore, a circumstance which can scarcely be sufficiently admired, that all these phenomena, which at first sight appear so unconnected, should be explained by one principle that of the mutual gravitation of all bodies with forces directly as their quantities of matter, and inversely as the squares of their distances. OF THE PRINCIPAL SYSTEMS OF ASTRONOMY, WHICH HAVE BEEN PROPOSED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE CELESTIAL PHENOMENA* After the description which has been given of the various pheno- mena of the heavens, both as viewed with the naked eye and the telescope, it may not be unnecessary, nor unacceptable to the reader, to give a short account of the principal theories, or systems, which have been formed at various periods to account for some of these appearances, and particularly for the apparent motions of the celestial bodies, OF THE PRINCIPAL SYSTEMS OF ASTRONOMY, &C. 147 The explanation of the celestial motions which naturally occurred to those who began the study of the heavens, was, that the stars are so many luminous points fixed in the surface of a sphere, having the earth in its centre, and revolving on an axis passing through that centre, in the space of twenty-four hours. When it was observed, that all the stars did not partake of this diurnal motion in the same degree, bat that some were carried slowly towards the east, and that their paths estimated in that direction, after certain intervals of time, returned into themselves, it was believed that they were fixed in the surfaces of spheres, which revolved westward more slowly than the sphere of the fixed stars. The spheres were supposed transpa- rent, or made of some crystalline substance, and from this arose the name of the crystalline spheres, by which they were distinguished* Though this system grew more complicated, as the number and variety of the apparent phenomena increased, yet it was the system of Aristotle and Eudoxus; and, with few exceptions, of all the philosophers of antiquity.* But when the business of observation came to be regularly pur- sued, little was said either of the fixed stars, or of the crystalline spheres ; astronomers being chiefly bent on ascertaining the laws or general facts connected with the motions of the planets. To do this, however, without the introduction of hypothesis, at this period, was scarcely possible. The simplest and most natural hypothesis was, that the planets moved eastward in circles, at a uni- form rate. But when it was found that, instead of moving uniformly to the eastward, every one of them was subject to great irregularity, the motion eastward becoming slower, at certain periods, and at length vanishing altogether, so that the planet became stationary, and afterwards acquiring a motion in the contrary direction, and pro- ceeded for a time to the westward, it was far from obvious that all these appearances could be reconciled with the idea of a uniform circular motion. The solution of this difficulty is attributed to Apollonius Pergaeus, one of the most celebrated mathematicians of antiquity. He con- ceived that each planet moved in a small circle, and that the centre of this small circle moved in the circumference of a large circle, which had the earth for its centre. The first of these circles was called the epicycle, and the second the deferent; and the motion in the circumference of each was supposed uniform. Lastly, it was conceived that the motion of the centre of the epicycle in the circum- ference of the deferent, and likewise the motion of the planet in that of the epicycle, were in opposite directions; the first being towards the east, and the scond towards the west. In this way, the change * Although it is said that Pythagoras taught that the earth was a planet, and that the sun was fixed in the centre of the planetary system ; thai the apparent revolution of the heavens was produced by the diurnal revolution of the earth; and that the apparent annual motion of the sun was occasioned by the earth- moving round him like the other planets ; yet this doctrine was never taught publicly, and in a very short time it was completely forgotten. O 2 148 OF THE PRINCIPAL SYSTEMS OF ASTRONOMY, &C. from progressive to retrograde, as well as the intermediate stationary points, were readily explained. But, notwithstanding the accomplishment of this important object, and some further applications of the method of epicycles by Hip- parchus, to account for the inequality of the sun's apparent motion round the earth, no regular system of astronomy appears to have been framed or taught by any individual till the appearance of the celebrated Ptolemy, who has always been reckoned the prince of ancient astronomers, not so much on account of being the founder of the system which goes by his name, as for the number of observations which he made, and the extent of his astronomical writings. PTOLEMAIC SYSTEM. Ptolemy supposed the earth to be fixed immoveably in the centre of the universe, and that the sun, moon, and planets move round it in the following order; viz. The Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, as represented by the following figure. P.M OF THE PRINCIPAL SYSTEMS OF ASTRONOMY, &C. 149 Above these he placed the firmament of fixed stars, then two crystalline spheres ; all of which were included in what he called theprimum mobile, which was by some unaccountable means turned round once in twenty-four hours, carrying all the rest along with it. From this arrangement, in which the sun is placed between Venus and Mars, it appears, that he was acquainted with the common dis- tinction of inferior and superior planets. It appears, also, that the arrangement of the planets in the above order, was made on consi- dering the time which each of them required to perform a complete circuit of the heavens ; hence we find the moon placed nearest t Argo Navis 2 8 39 52 1-6 54 3 45 S. + 13 Argo Navis 1 9 11 17 0-7 68 59 42 S. -f 15 a Hydra Alphard 2 9 18 56 3-0 7 53 58 S. -f 15 a Leo .. .. REGULUS 1 9 58 59 3-2 12 49 27 N. 17 Ursa Major 2 10 51 10 3-7 57 19 25 N. 19 a Ursa Major .. Dubke 1-2 10 52 47 3-8 62 41 57 N. 19 Leo Deneb 2 11 40 5 3-1 15 33 22 N. - 20 a Crux 1 12 16 54 3-2 62 7 29 S. + 20 y Crux 2 12 21 26 3-3 56 7 21 S. + 20 Crux 2 12 37 30 3'4 58 43 33 S. -f 20 a Virgo SPICA 1 13 15 56 3-1 10 14 19 S. + 19 * Ursa Major .. Benetnach 2 13 40 36 2-4 50 11 42 N. 18 Centaurus 2 13 51 30 4-1 59 31 2 S. + 18 a Draco 2-3 13 59 39 1-6 65 13 8 N. 17 a Bootes .. .. Arcturus 1 14 7 39 2-7 20 6 12 N. 19 a Centaurus 1 14 28 18 4-4 60 7 5 S. + 16 a Libra Zubenesch 2-3 14 41 4 3-3 15 16 48 S. + 15 Libra Zubenelg 2-3 15 7 34 3-2 8 43 38 S. H- 14 a Corona Borealis .. Alphacca 2 15 27 15 2-5 27 18 47 N. 12 a Serpens 2 15 35 36 2-9 6 59 11 N. 12 a Scorpio .. .. ANTARES 1 16 18 37 3-6 26 1 50 S. -f 9 a Hercules .. Ras Algethi 2 17 6 38 2-7 14 35 56 N. 4 a Serpentarius .. Ras AUiague 2 17 26 46 2-8 12 41 47 N. . Q y Draco Rastaban 2-3 17 52 31 1-4 51 30 48 N. 1 a Lyra Vega 1 18 30 59 2-0 38 37 33 N. + 3 a Aquila .. .. ALTAIR 1-2 19 42 12 2-9 8 24 41 N. + 9 a Pavo .. 1*2 20 11 40 4.8 57 17 19 S. 11 a Cygnus . Arided 1-2 20 35 26 2-0 44 39 21 N. + 13 a Cepheus Alderaimin 3 21 14 22 1-4 61 50 31 N. + 15 a Grux .. 2 21 57 6 3-8 47 48 11 S. 17 a Pisces Aus FOMALHAUT 1 22 47 54 3'3 30 33 10 S. 19 Pegasus .. Scheat 2 22 25 15 2-9 27 7 37 N. + 19 a Pegasus .. MARCAB 2 22 56 3-0 14 15 42 N. -f 19 a Andromeda .. Alpheratz 2 23 59 19 3-1 28 17 10 N. + 20 REMARKS ON THE MOON. 17 Remarks on different Hypotheses respecting the Moon, and various Phe- nomena of that Planet. WE make no apology for submitting to our readers the subjoined extracts from a highly ingenious and interesting work, entitled SELENOGNOSTIC FRAGMENTS, published by Dr. Gruithuisen, whose name ranks deservedly high in the list of foreign astronomers. No body in the starry heavens, observes the Doctor, in his intro- duction, excites more general interest than the faithful satellite of the earth : in fact, its surface presents, even to the naked eye, objects so varied, that it instantly inspires the spectator with a wish to inspect this unknown world, with the aid of a powerful telescope. But what especially prompts us to study the physical properties and constitu- tion of the moon, is the expectation of discovering an analogy com- mon to all the great bodies of the universe, with respect to their or- ganization. This, he adds, is what has hitherto been the foundation of my celestial observations, being myself convinced that we shall never attain to any excellence in the study of geognosy, till we have discovered this analogy. It is with this intention that the author has surveyed, examined, and studied many chains of terrestrial moun- tains ; and it is with this view that he publishes the particular appear- ances, which eight years observations have enabled him to remark upon the surface of the moon. To render his work more intelligible to his readers, the Doctor has inserted a lithographic general map of this planet ; for which purpose he has consulted Mayer's draught of the moon, and the special maps given by Schroeter in his Selenographic Fragments. Nor has he neg- lected to avail himself of his own observations. He likewise cites the lunar map of Lambert, and refers to a memoir of that philosopher in the first volume of the Berlin astronomical almanack. Atmosphere of the Moon. Cassini, Louville, Bianchini, Carbone, Euler, Kriiger, Boscovich, Ulloa, Dusejour, Wolf, and Halle, maintain the existence of a lunar atmosphere; while Mayer, Grandjean de Fouchy, De 1'Isle, and De la Hire, deny it. Without dwelling upon the reasons and observations which, before the inven- tion of achromatic telescopes have been alleged on both sides of the questions, Doctor Gruithuisen confines himself to the direct proofs drawn from the discoveries of Schroeter. The latter has calculated the elevation of the twilight observed by him in repeated observa- tions on the increasing moon. This elevation agrees in a surprising manner with the theorem of Melanderhielm ; namely, that on the sur- face of planets the density of their atmospheres is in proportion to the squares of the weight of the bodies. This proportion had been sug- gested to Newton by that of the squares of weights on the surface of the moon, and the surface of the earth. In fact, this latter propor- tion being as 1 to 28'40, is almost equal to the result of Schroeter, who found that the lunar atmosphere is 28*94 times less dense than our own. Hevelius, Deluc, and many other philosophers, have thought that the air on the surface of planets was only ether con- densed, and have considered ether, in its turn, as rarified air, an 18 REMARKS ON THE MOON. opinion, which, in a theoretical point of view, confirms the theorem of Melanderhielm. To attempt to combat this theory, adds our author, would have the effect of entangling us in a multitude of inextricable difficulties; for we must then affirm that ether and air have no communication to- gether; that consequently they cannot mix, and that there is between them a kind of barrier, as if our earth was enclosed in a globe of hol- low glass : yet we know that all gases mingle together, which, moreover, must happen from the pressure of our air upon ether, and, reciprocally, on account of the rapid motion of the earth. It is to this pressure that M. de Zach attributes the diurnal oscillations of the barometer, observed at the equator by H umboldt. We should like- wise be obliged to affirm, that as the air of planets is essentially dif- ferent from ether, there can be no affinity between them, and conse- quently that nobody can burn in ether for want of oxygen, a conclu- sion not warranted by observations, since shooting stars and meteors burn and shine at a height at which in general the presence of atmos- pheric air is not supposed. For example, in 1795, Schroeter saw, with his reflecting telescope of 20 feet long, a shooting star, the height of which he estimated at more than four millions of miles. If then it be admitted that each body of the universe, by the influence of a weight proportioned to its bulk, forms out of ether, the atmos- phere by which it is surrounded, then the moon must also borrow from ether its portion, which becomes condensed and forms its at- mosphere. The existence of water in the lunar atmosphere can no longer be questioned, for clouds have been seen upon its surface, as is proved by the almost innumerable observations of Schroeter, to whose work the Doctor refers for more extensive details. Organised Beings in the Moon. It is a remarkable circumstance, observes M. Gruithuisen, that all those who only take what may be termed a cursory survey of the moon through a telescope, consider it as a desert and globe, upon which nothing lives or grows : on the contrary, others who have explored its surface for many years, speak of it, as if organised beings could not fail to exist there. Shroeter conjectures the existence of a town towards the north of murius (a lunar spot), and the canals which are observable towards hyginus (another spot), and which, after disappearing in some places, are again perceived in others (a thing, says Dr. G. of which I have convinced myself), appear to him very advantageous for the com- merce of the Selcnites: finally, he represents a part of the spot named mare imbrium to be as fertile as Campania. The ancients supposed the moon to be inhabited. Orpheus, Anax- agoras, Xenophon, and Pythagoras, are of this opinion. Their strength of reasoning compensated, in this instance, for their want of telescopes : even Plutarch entertained the idea, that .the obscure places on the moon's surface were seas, which could not reflect the light of the sun. More recently, Kepler, Duhamel, and many others have been of the same way of thinking respecting the existence of the Selenites. Indeed, so general has this sentiment been, that even the American savages have believed the moon to be inhabited. REMARKS ON THE MOON. 19 Iii latter times, some persons have considered the too great rare- faction of the air as an insuperable obstacle to peopling the moon. Without doubt, says our author, this circumstance would not fail to alarm more than one philosopher of a delicate constitution, particu- larly when he knows that neither raisins nor apricots are to be found even on the Chimbora^o. Others, on the contrary, have not forgotten that Mr. Guy-Lussac ascended, with his balloon, to a height greater by 2000 feet than the height of that mountain. So that an inhabitant of our globe, if placed in the lowest regions of the moon, might find himself very ill at his ease, but not so much so as to cause his death. While speaking of the inhabitants of the moon, we may observe, that some theorists have affirmed that no animated beings could exist on that planet, but such as were capable of eating stones, do- ing without drink, living on a scanty supply of air, and supporting the extremes of heat and cold. These particulars, adds Mr. Gui- thuisen, may be considered as a summing up of all the doubts that have arisen on the question whether the planets are habitable or not. He then discusses each of these points. He thinks he can confidently affirm that the moon has vegetables and animals to serve for food to its inhabitants : he even goes so far as to indicate some of their genera and species. In the absence of wine, he continues, the Se- Icnites have water, so that they possess the means of quenching their thirst. They are likewise supplied with air in more than sufficient quantity, only that this air is extremely rarefied. If we admit of lakes and seas in the moon, why should they not contain shell and other fish, and amphibious beings? And that man can accustom him- self to a highly rarefied atmosphere, has been shewn by the aerial ascent of M. Guy-Lussac, already referred to. According to Hum- boldt, the atmosphere supports a column of quicksilver of only twenty inches at Quito ; of eighteen inches at Micuipampa, and of seventeen inches in the latitude of Antisana, all inhabited places upon the earth, notwithstanding this rarefaction. Lastly, the Selen- ites can face the cold and heat with the assistance of fire, which they have the means of procuring in the former case ; and in the latter, by means of the deep caverns, in whose coolness they can obtain refuge from the heat. Waters in the Mom. By these, says our author, I understand all the springs, rivers, lakes, and seas. After having collected and discussed at great length all the facts calculated to illustrate the subject, he thinks he has a right to ask, who can now bring forward any probable argument against the existence of lakes in the moon ? But, he adds, lakes presuppose rivers, or at least simple rivulets or springs, their existence is then sufficiently demonstrated. Of the Lunar Structure. The interior structure of the moon is probably not different from that which is common to all the bodies of the universe ; namely, concentric beds formed by the accumulation of successive strata. Of the Exterior Structure or Constitution. This consists properly in 20 OBSERVATIONS ON THE FIXED STARS. the chains of mountains ; the caverns, the declivities and the acclivi- ties are immediate consequences of this disposition. We shall only add a few words relative to the lithographical map which Doctor Gruithuisen has attached to his work, for the purpose of facilitating the discovery of the points, which he more particularly wishes to designate upon the face of the moon. To accomplish this, he indicates their situation by their distance from two lines, which may be said to represent the equator and the first meridian of the moon, which we consider to be a felicitous and useful imitation of terrestrial longitudes and latitudes. On Professor Struve's Observations to determine the Parallax of the fixed Stars. OF the various attempts to discover the parallax of the fixed stars, the observations of Professor Struve must be regarded as among the best, and most judicious. His object is, by means of an excellent transit instrument furnished with seven wires, to determine the sum of the parallaxes of several fixed stars, differing nearly 12 hours in right ascension from each other. The results which he obtains, seem to verify a remark made by Mr. Pond, that in proportion as any improvement takes place either in our instruments or our processes, the resulting parallax becomes proportionally less. Of fourteen sets of opposite stars thus compared, Mr. Struve finds seven, which give the parallax negative; this circumstance alone should suggest great caution in attributing to the effects of parallax the small positive quantities that are derived from the remaining seven. Mr. Struve however is inclined to assign 0".16 of space as the parallax of 8 Ursae Minoris, and 0".45 for the sum of the paral- laxes of Cigni, and * TJrsae Majoris. His learned coadjutor, M. Walbeck, who, it appears, has undertaken the calculations, is dis- posed to attribute the greatest portion of this parallax to the smaller star; a circumstance so improbable requires very strong evidence for its support. If we take the mean of the fourteen results as relating generally to stars from the 1st to the 4th magnitude, jt will appear that the mean sum of the parallaxes of two opposite stars is equal to 0".036 of space, or the parallax of a single star equal to 0".018. If any reliance can be placed on these observations, evWy at- tempt to determine the parallax of these stars in declination must be entirely hopeless ; since in this case we can only measure the shorter axis of the Ellipse, and the uncertainty of refraction must amount, at least, to twenty times the quantity we are in search of. FIGURE OF THE EARTH. 21 On the Method of Determining the Figure of the Earth by the Pendulum. THE method of determining the figure of the earth by means of the pendulum, depends upon the variation of gravity at the earth's surface. This subtile and pervading power, tends to communicate to bodies exposed to its influence equal velocities in equal times. One of the modifications of this action is the oscillation of the pendulum, which is of longer or shorter dilation, according to the energy of the attrac- tive force, and the square root of the length of the pendulum. If the earth were an exact sphere, destitute of the motion of rotation, and possessing the same density throughout its whole mass, the force of gravity, by which bodies at its surface are drawn towards the centre, would be uniform, and invariable in every latitude. But the elliptical form of the earth destroys this uniformity, and causes the attractive force at the poles to preponderate over that at the equator. This inequality in the force, by which bodies at the surface of the earth retain their positions, is augmented by the diurnal rotation, which, by centrifugal tendency, impresses a greater disposition on bodies to recede from the centre of the earth at the equator than at the poles, where its effects cease to be felt. By the joint operation of these two causes, one of which acts with a force proportional to the square of the sine of the latitude, a sensible difference ought to be observed in the velocity acquired by heavy bodies, in falling through the same space, as we advance from the equator to the poles. An important relation between the time of the vibration of a pendulum, and that of the descent of a heavy body, according to which the lengths of pendulums, vibrating ischronously, are directly as the force of gravity, enables us to submit this conclusion to the test of experi- ment. Newton long ago demonstrated, that if the earth were per- fectly homogeneous, the same fraction, viz. 230 , would express both the compression of the terrestrial ellipsoid, and the increase of gravity from the equator to the poles. This conclusion, which was deduced from the supposition of an uniform density, was afterwards modified, with singular address, by Clairaut, who showed, that the two frac- tions expressing the compression, and the increase of grvity, though not exactly equal, must always together amount to . Assuming the compression, therefore, to be eqnal to 3 } 2 , the increase of gravity from the equator to the poles, or the indication of that increase, as given by the length of the pendulum, should be 3*, 3 } 2 , or ^ nearly. The correctness of this conclusion, if not completely established, is, at least, to a certain extent, confirmed, by the experiments which have been made with the pendulum in different latitudes. La Place having selected fifteen of the best of these observations, and applied to them the necessary corrections, on account of the resistance of the air, difference of temperature, and elevation above the level of the sea, deduced the following results, in which the length of the pendulum at Paris is considered to be unity. 22 FIGURE OF THE EARTH. Latitude. Length of the Seconds Pendulum. Names of the Observers. Places of Observation. Equator 99669 Bouguer Peru 9 32' 56" 99689 Ditto Portobello 11 55 30 99710 Gentil Pondicherry 18 99745 Campbell Jamaica 18 27 99728 Bouguer Petit Grave 34 7 15 99877 La Caille Cape G. H. 43 35 45 99950 Darquior Toulouse 48 12 48 99077 Liesganig Vienna 48 50 1-00000 Bouguer Paris 50 58 1-00006 Zach Gotha 51 30 1-00018 London 58 14 53 1-00074 Mallet Petersburgh 59 56 24 1-00101 Ditto Ponoi 66 48 JL-00137 Grischow Arensberg 67 5 1-00148 Mapertius Tornea The above results indicate obviously an increase of the force of gravity from the equator towards the poles. La Place has shewn that, in whatever way they are combined, it is impossible to avoid an error of less than '00018, on the hypothesis of the variation of gravity at the surface of the earth increasing as the squares of the sines of the latitude from the equator to the poles. The expression for the ellipti- city, which connects best the different equations of condition, is 38 J. 78 , a result which accords in a very remarkable manner with the com- pression deduced from the measures of the French mathematicians in France, and at the equator. It may be inferred from these experiments with the pendulum, that the compression of the earth is greater than is compatible with the supposition of an uniform density. The same anomalies, too, which are discernible in the measurement of a degree of the meridian, and which are undoubtedly owing to the dissimilar structure of the globe, may be traced in the results of these experiments. The beautiful pro- perty of the pendulum, first discovered by Huggens, that the centre of oscillation and the point of suspension, are interchangeable with each other, and which has been so happily applied by Captain Kater, to determine the length of the seconds' pendulum, renders this mechani- cal contrivance infinitely better fitted to ascertain the true figure of the earth, than the complicated methods which were formerly em- ployed for the same purpose. The facility with which the observations may be made, and the certainty of the results with which they are attended, may be expected to furnish much interesting information, not only with respect to the general form of the globe, but also with respect to its structure and composition in particular situations. TABLE. TIME to be ADDED to the RIGHT ASCENSION of a STAR, to find the TIME of it* PASSING the MERIDIAN on any day of the YEAR. Days. Jan. Feb. March April May June July August Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Days h. in. h. in. h. m. h. m. h. m. L. m. h. m. h. in. h. m. h. m. h. in. h. m. 1 5 14 3 2 1 12 23 18 21 37 19 25 17 20 15 15 13 19 11 31 9 35 7 31 1 2 5 10 2 58 1 8 23 15 21 23 19 20 17 16 15 11 13 16 11 28 9 31 7 27 2 3 5 6 2 54 1 4 23 11 21 20 19 16 17 12 15 8 13 12 11 24 9 27 7 23 3 4 5 1 2 50 1 1 23 7 21 16 19 12 17 8 15 4 13 8 11 20 9 23 7 18 4 5 4 57 2 46 57 23 4 21 12 19 8 17 4 15 13 5 11 17 9 19 7 14 5 6 4 52 2 42 53 23 21 8 19 4 17 14 56 13 1 11 13 9 15 7 9 6 7 4 48 2 38 50 22 56 21 4 19 16 56 14 52 12 58 11 9 9 11 7 5 7 8 4 44 2 34 46 22 53 21 18 56 16 51 14 48 12 54 11 6 9 7 7 1 8 9 4 39 2 30 42 22 49 20 56 18 52 16 47 14 45 12 50 11 2 9 3 6 56 9 10 4 35 2 26 39 22 45 20 52 18 47 16 43 14 41 12 47 10 58 8 59 6 52 10 11 4 31 2 22 35 22 42 20 49 18 43 16 39 14 37 12 43 10 55 8 55 6 47 11 12 4 26 2 18 31 22 38 20 45 18 39 16 35 14 33 12 40 10 51 8 51 6 43 12 13 4 22 2 14 27 22 34 20 41 18 35 16 31 14 29 12 36 10 47 8 47 6 39 13 14 4 18 2 10 24 22 31 20 37 18 31 16 27 14 26 12 32 10 44 8 43 6 34 14 15 4 13 2 6 20 22 27 20 33 18 27 16 23 14 22 12 29 10 40 8 39 6 30 15 16 4 9 2 2 17 22 83 20 29 18 23 16 19 14 18 12 25 10 36 8 35 6 25 16 17 4 5 1 58 13 22 20 20 25 18 18 16 15 14 14 12 22 10 32 8 30 6 21 17 18 4 1 55 9 22 16 20 21 18 14 16 11 14 11 12 18 JO 29 8 26 6 17 18 19 3 56 1 51 6 22 12 20 17 18 10 16 7 14 7 12 14 10 25 8 22 6 12 19 20 3 52 1 47 2 22 9 20 13 18 6 16 3 14 3 12 11 10 21 8 18 6 8 20 21 3 48 1 43 23 58 22 5 20 9 18 2 15 59 14 12 7 10 17 8 14 6 3 21 22 3 43 1 39 23 55 22 1 20 5 17 58 15 55 13 56 12 4 10 14 8 10 5 59 22 23 3 39 1 35 23 51 21 57 20 1 17 53 15 51 13 52 12 10 10 8 5 5 54 23 24 3 35 1 32 23 47 21 54 19 57 17 49 15 47 13 48 11 56 10 6 8 1 5 50 24 25 3 31 1 28 23 44 21 50 19 53 17 45 15 43 13 45 11 53 10 2 7 57 5 45 25 26 3 27 1 24 23 40 21 46 19 49 17 41 15 39 13 41 11 49 9 58 7 53 5 41 26 27 3 23 1 20 23 37 21 42 19 45 17 37 15 35 13 37 11 46 9 54 7 48 5 37 27 28 3 18 1 17 23 33 21 39 19 41 17 33 15 31 13 34 11 42 9 51 7 44 5 32 28 29 5 14 1 14 23 29 21 35 19 37 17 29 15 27 13 30 11 38 9 47 7 40 5 28 29 30 3 10 23*26 21 31 19 33 17 24 15 23 13 27 11 35 9 43 7 35 5 23 30 31 3 6 23 22 19 29 15 19 13 23 9 39 5 19 31 WATER SPOUTS. Water Spouts. Remarkable Water-spout in France in 1823. In the arrondissemens of Dreux and of Mantes, about 3 o'clock of the 26th of August, 1823, a storm came on from the S.W., accompanied with a sudden and powerful heat. A water- spout was seen not far from the village of JBoncourt, having its broad base resting on the ground, and its sum- mit lost in the clouds. It consisted of a thick and blackish vapour, in the middle of which were often seen flames in several directions. Advancing along with the storm, it broke or tore up by the roots, in the space of a league, seven or eight hundred trees of different sizes, and at last burst with great violence in the village of Marchepoy, one half of the houses of which were instantly destroyed. The walls, overturned to their foundations, rolled down on all sides ; the roofs, when carried off, broke in pieces, and the debris were dragged to the distance of half a league by the force of this aerial torrent. Some of the inhabitants were crushed to pieces, or wounded by the fall of their houses, and those who were occupied in the labours of the field, were overthrown or blown away by the whirlwind. Hailstones as large as the fist, and stones and other foreign bodies carried off by the wind, injured several individuals. Carts heavily loaded were broken in pieces, and their loads dispersed. Their axle-trees were broken, and the wheels were found at the distance of 200 or 300 paces from the spot where they were overturned. One of these carts, which had been carried off almost bodily, was pitched above a tile- kiln, which had been beaten down, and some of the materials of which had been carried to a considerable distance. A spire, several hamlets, and different insulated houses, were overthrown. Several villages were considerably injured. The lower part of the water- spout is supposed to have been about 100 toises in diameter. See the Moniteur of the 31st October, where the account is signed by M. Foucault, and the Bibl Univers. Oct. 1823, p. 133. Water-spout near Genoa in 1823. In the communes of Quigliano and Valeggia, in the province of Savona, a heavy rain fell on the 16th September, at 5 o'clock in the morning. It increased to such a degree, that at 9 o'clock in the morning the country was inundated. Towards noon there issued from a mountain situated in the parish of Valeggia, a whirlwind of black smoke and fire. It first carried off the roof of a house, in which two children were crushed to pieces, and the parents wounded. The water-spout then advanced to the opposite side of the mountain, called Magliolo ; crossed the river, the waters of which it heaped up in an instant, though they were much swelled ; carried off the roofs of two inhabited houses, and advanced along the same mountain in the district of Quigliano, where it dissipated itself near the Convent of Capuchins, situated in the village. It tore up many large trees of all kinds, and committed ravages, the extent of which is not yet known. The preceding account was sent by the commandant of the province of Savona to the governor of Genoa, in a letter, part of which is published in the Moniteur of the 1st of October, and in the Bibl. Univers. Nov. 1823, p. 135. OF THE RAINBOW. 25 Of the Rainbow. THE phenomena of the rainbow consists, as every person knows, of two bows, or arches, stretching across the sky, and tinged with all the colours of the prismatic spectrum. The internal or principal rainbow, which is often seen without the other, has the violet rays innermost, and the red rays outermost. The external, or secondary rainbow, which is much fainter than the other, has the violet colour outermost, and the red colour innermost. Sometimes supernumerary bows are seen to accompany the principal bows. As the rainbow is never seen unless when the sun shines, and when rain is falling, it has been universally ascribed to the decomposition of white light by the refraction of the drops of rain, and their reflec- tion within the drops. The production of rainbows by the spray of water-falls, or by drops of water scattered by a brush or syringe, is an experimental proof of their origin. Let an observer be placed with his back to the sun, and his eye directed through a shower of rain to the part of the sky opposite to the sun. As the drops of rain are spherical particles of water, they will reflect and refract the sun's rays, according to the usual laws of refraction and reflection. Thus, in the following figure, where ssss represent the sun's rays, and A the place of a spectator, in the centre of the two bows (the planes of which are supposed to be perpendicu- lar to his view), the drops a and b produce part of the inner bow by two refractions and one reflection ; and the drops c and d part of the exterior bow, by two refractions and one reflection. This holds good at whatever height the sun may chance to be in a shower of rain ; if high, the rainbow must be low ; if the sun be low, the rainbow is high : and if a shower happen in a vale when a spec- tator is on a mountain, he often sees the bow completed to a circle below him. So, in the spray of the sea, or a cascade, a circular rain- 26 OF THE RAINBOW. bow is often seen ; and it is but the interposition of the earth that pre- vents a circular spectrum from being seen at all times, the eye being the vertex of a cone, whose base (the bow) is in part cut off by the earth. It is only necessary, for the formation of a rainbow, that* the sun should shine on a dense cloud, or a shower of rain, in a proper situa- tion, or even on a number of minute drops of water, scattered by a brush or by a syringe, so that the the light may reach the eye after having undergone a certain angular deviation, by means of various refractions and reflections, as already stated. The light which is reflected by the external surface of a sphere, is scattered almost equally in all directions, setting aside the difference arising from the greater efficacy of oblique reflection : but when it first enters the drop, and is there reflected by its posterior surface, its deviation never exceeds a certain angle, which depends on the degree of refrangi- bility, and is, therefore, different for light of different colours : and the density of the light being the greatest at the angle of greatest devi- ation, the appearance of a luminous arch is produced by the rays of each colour at its appropriate distance. The rays which never enter the drops produce no other effect, than to cause a brightness, or hazi- ness, round the sun, where the reflection is the most oblique : those which are once reflected within the drop, exhibit the common inter- nal or primary rainbow, at the distance of about 41 degrees from the point opposite to the sun : those which are twice reflected, the exter- nal or secondary rainbow, of 52 degrees; and if the effect of the light, three times reflected, were sufficiently powerful, it would appear at the distance of about 42 degrees from the sun. The colours of both rainbows encroach considerably on each other ; for each point of the sun may be considered as affording a distinct arch of each colour, and the whole disc, as producing an arch about half a degree in breadth, for each kind of light ; so that the arrangement nearly resembles that of the common mixed spectrum. A lunar rainbow is much more rarely seen than a solar one ; but its colours differ little, except in intensity, from those of the common rainbow. The appearance of a rainbow may be produced at any time, when the sun shines, as follows; opposite to a window, into which the sun shines, suspend a glass globe, filled with clear water, in such a manner as to be able to raise it or lower it at pleasure, in order that the sun's rays may strike upon it. Raise the globe gradually, and when it gets to the altitude of forty degrees, a person standing in a proper situation, will perceive a purple colour in the glass, and upon raising it higher the other prismatic colours, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red, will successively appear. After this, the colours will disappear, till the globe be raised to about fifty degrees, when they will again be seen, but in an inverted order; the red appearing first, and the blue, or violet, last. Upon raising the globe to about fifty-four degrees, the colours will totally vanish. In the highest northern latitudes, where the air is commonly loaded with frozen particles, the sun and moon usually appear sur- rounded by halos, or coloured circles, at the distances of about 22 ON THE LINE OF PERPETUAL CONGELATION. 27 and 46 degrees from their centres. Several new forms of halos and paraselenae, or mock-moons, have been described by Captain Ross and Captain Parry. And Captain Scoresby, in his account of the Arctic Regions, has delineated an immense number of particles of snow, which assume the most beautiful and varied crystallizations, all depending more or less on ^six-sided combinations of minute par- ticles of ice. When particles of such forms are floating or descending in the air, there can be no difficulty in deriving from them those various and in- tricate forms which are occasionally met with among this class of phenomena. Halos are frequently observed in other climates, as well as in the northern regions of the globe, especially in the colder months, and in the light clouds which float in the highest regions of the air. The halos are usually attended by a horizontal white circle, with brighter spots, or parhelia, near their intersections with this circle, and with portions of inverted arches of various curvatures; the horizontal circle has also sometimes anthelia, or bright spots nearly opposite to the sun. These phenomena have usually been attributed to the effect of spherical particles of hail, each having a central opaque portion of a certain magnitude, mixed with oblong particles, of a determinate form, and floating with a certain constant obliquity to the horizon. But all these arbitrary suppositions, which were imagined by Huy- gens, are in themselves extremely complicated and improbable. A much simpler, and more natural, as well as more accurate explana- tion, which was suggested at an earlier period by Mariotte, had long been wholly forgotten, till the same idea occurred to Dr. Young. The explanation given by the last mentioned philosophers is, that water has a tendency to congeal or crystallize in the form of a prism, and that the rays of light passing through these prisms (which are disposed in various positions,) by their own weight, are so refracted as to produce the different appearances which halos and parhelia have been observed to assume. The colours which these phenomena exhibit, are nearly the same as the rainbow, but less distinct ; the red being nearest to the luminary, and the whole halo being very ill defined on the exterior side. Some- times the figures of halos and parhelia are so complicated, as to defy all attempts to account for the formation of their different parts ; but if the various forms and appearances which the flakes of snow assume, be considered, there will be no reason to think them inade- quate to the production of all these appearances. On the Line of Perpetual Congelation. In consequence of the diminution of temperature which is experi- enced as we ascend in the atmosphere, it is evident that in every climate a point of elevation may be reached where it will be con- tinually freezing. The altitude of the point above the surface of the earth, will depend partly on the temperature of the lower regions of the atmosphere, and partly on the decrement of heat belonging to the column at the period of observation, Thus, near the equator, it was observed by Bougner, that it began to freeze on the sides of 28 ON THE LINE OF PERPETUAL CONGELATION. the lofty mountain Pinchencha, at the height of 15,577 feet above the level of the sea, whereas congelation was found by Saussure to take place on the Alps at the height of 13,428 feet. By tracing a line on the plane of the meridian, through the points at which it con- stantly freezes, a curve is obtained, which has been denominated the line of Perpetual Congelation. The height at which this curve inter- sects a vertical line in the various latitudes, has been computed by Kirwan, partly from observation, and partly from the mean tempera- ture of the parallel, and the decrement of heat, as we ascend in the atmosphere. The following table exhibits the result of his calcu- lations ; and though it is constructed on the erroneous supposition, that the mean annual temperature of the pole is 31, which, accord- ing to the observations of Captain Scoresby and Captain Parry, must be far beyond the truth, it is tolerably accurate for the more accessible regions of the globe. Mean Height of Line Mean Height of Line Latitude. of Congelation. Latitude. of Congelation. - - - 15,577 45 - - - 7,658 5 - - 15,457 50 - - - 6,260 10 - - - 15,067 55 - - - 4,912 15 - - , 15,498 60 - - - 3,684 20 - - - 13,719 65 - - - 2,516 25 - - - 13,030 70 - - - 1,557 30 - - - 31,592 75 - - - 748 35 - - - 10,664 BO - - - 128 40 - - - 9,016 These numerical relations will be best perceived at a glance, by means of the following diagram : H 14,000 Here E P represents the rectified meridian from the equator to the pole, divided into intervals of 10 each; and the different perpendi- culars or ordinates at the point 0, 10, 20, &c. represent the height of the freezing point at the equator, and at latitude 10, 20, &c. to the pole P. The curve H P, which has a contrary flexure about 60, exhibits the general form of the line of Perpetual Congelation from the equator to the pole. ON THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC CLOCKS. 29 On the manner of Regulating Public Clocks. By J. LlTTROW, Director of the Observatory of Vienna. Up to this time, says the Author, in our town and many others, persons have been appointed for the express purpose of regulating the public clocks : every one knows by experience in what manner they discharge this duty. The first thing to be desired is that public clocks should agree better, if not with the heavens, at least with one another, to obviate the possibility of mistakes arising in keeping appointments at any given time. Undoubtedly it is sufficient for many persons if the town clocks keep time tolerably together, whether right or wrong; but there are likewise many others to whom it is of importance that they should go correctly. In fact, if the principal church clock, by which the others must be regulated, be bad (and the best clocks of this descrip- tion are so, if compared with astronomical clocks), it will go some- times too slow, sometimes too fast, and it will be necessary some- times to put the other clocks-back, and sometimes forward, although they are often better than the principal ones. It will be the same with regard to private clocks, which, adds Mr. Littrow, must be con- tinually adjusted, to make them agree with the principal town-clock, by which all the others must be regulated. Thus the public clocks, if we wish to establish systematic order, ought not only to agree together, but the clock which serves to regulate the others must go well, and correspond exactly to the great celestial clock; this must be the second necessary condition. But how is this conformity to be brought about ? The pretended regulating clocks, or the common pendulums frequently used for that purpose, are of no great utility, on account of their elevated situation, of their being exposed to the influence of variations of temperature, and to the high winds which cannot fail to agitate lofty towers, and of the oscil- latory movement communicated by the bells, at the time of striking, to the whole building. The solar dials of themselves are too small and too imperfect, to expect from them the exactness necessary in such a case. Meridians, besides various other inconveniences, are of no use except when the sun appears precisely at noon. If, which is not uncommon in our foggy months of winter, the sun is three or four weeks concealed behind the clouds, at noon-time, even when the rest of the day is fine, the poor superintendant of the clock-house can no longer discern the time, and must remain inactive, even though his clock should be so much out of order, as to be half an hour too slow or too fast. In order to accomplish this object satisfactorily, a signal should be given from an observatory, the only place in which the time of the day can he known with certainty at every instant. To remedy this double inconvenience, and to regulate for the future the town-clocks (of Vienna), he proposes that, commencing from the 1st of March, 1824, the precise moment of noon shall be coiuiuuni- h 30 ON THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC CLOCKS. cated by a large bell, placed in the observatory for that purpose, in the following manner. Two minutes before noon, the sound of the bell shall give warning for some seconds to inform the superintendants of the public clocks, and all the inhabitants of the town, that it is time to go to their clocks and regulate them. Twenty-four seconds before noon, the same bell to begin striking like a clock, one stroke every two seconds, so that the twelfth and last stroke is the precise moment of noon. Exactly at this last stroke, it shall be previously arranged for the clock of St. Stephen's church to begin striking noon, which will serve as a signal to regulate with axactness all the other public clocks of the town and suburbs. Every inhabitant will like- wise be able to avail himself of this opportunity to regulate his own clock. We think we ought, says M. Littrow, to add two remarks to the preceding. The first relates to the persons to whom the execution of the plan must be principally confided. They have often occasion to know the time almost to a second, and the means which they have hitherto employed effected their purpose badly, or not at all. We are not speaking here of those who, like their predecessors in the last century, make use of solar dials, and other methods equally defective ; for such workmen, who are satisfied with knowing the time within a few minutes, must not be confounded with real artists. But there are men of this class, adds Mr. Littrow, and I myself know several, who would rival the most celebrated artists of England, if they received the necessary encouragements. Every English artist has an obser- vatory in Ijis house for his own use ; it is with this great celestial clock that he compares his instruments ; he corrects and rectifies his work, till he is able to say, with a full conviction to every purchaser who presents himself " It is ready, it is finished, it is complete." Our author's second remark relates to the difference which exists between what is called true time and mean time. He here enters into a long digression on measuring time by the moon. The most ancient nations regulated their weeks by this planet and its dif- ferent phases. Many periods of unequal duration have been invented to calculate centuries and ages, but men have been unanimous in reckoning seven days to the week, the origin of which is lost in re- mote antiquity. Doubtless at first sight, the moon appears, by its continually changing disk, and its striking phases, to have been made expressly to serve as a perpetual calendar : nevertheless, it will soon be perceived, that, of all the heavenly bodies, it has the least right to this prerogative. In fact the Jews, among whom the moon plays the most important part, have the most confused chronology among the moderns. There are no less than six different kinds of years in use among them, and the learned alone can comprehend their calendar, which in exceedingly complicated. But what shall we say of our pwn ecclesiastical computation ? Are there many people, even among the well-informed, who can tell what day Easter or Whitsuntide will fall upon, in any year ? If the moon is so ill adapted for regulating the calendar, we may ON THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC CLOCKS. 31 likewise observe that it is not from the sun we can expect an exact division of the day into hours, minutes, &c. In fact, to adopt popular language, the sun moves in an ellipse, in an oval curve. In winter, he is nearer the earth than in summer, and he moves faster in the former season than in the latter. This circumstance alone would create an inequality in the length of the days, as well as in that of the hours, minutes, &c. But there is besides another cause of ine- quality. The sun moves in the ecliptic, whose plane makes an angle of about 23 28' with that of the equator, and it is to this latter circle that we refer the measure of time. In fact all our determinations on this head are founded on the perfectly uniform rotation of the hea- vens, or rather of the earth, around the axis of the world, that is to say, around the axis of the equator, the direction of which is exactly from south to north. Even were the sun to move uniformly in the ecliptic, for instance, a degree each day, this degree, referred to the equator, would hardly ever correspond to a degree of the latter circle, but would be sometimes more, sometimes less. So that even the motion of the sun at a constantly equal rate would be to no purpose ; his motion would be unequal with respect to us, and could not serve to determine the time exactly. Since the true sun, that king of our days, that dispenser of light and heat, so useful to form great periods of years and centuries, is so little adapted to measure the day and its parts, astronomers have chosen another sun, which assuredly has neither light nor heat, and does not even exist in the heavens, but which is, for that very reason, the better calculated to be the regulator of our clocks. This sun, which is called the mean sun, to distinguish it from the true sun that attracts the eye, moves uniformly in the plane of the equator, so that it completes its annual course in the same time that the real sun tra- verses the ecliptic by an unequal movement. When this mean sun passes over the meridian of a place, we say that it is mean noon in that place ; and often in the course of a year, there is more than a quarter of an hour of difference between this mean noon, and the true noon of the real sun. But as the mean solar days are always of the same length, the mean noon will always be exactly given by the last stroke of the observatory bell, as before explained. In this manner, clocks will no longer be made to go against their nature, that is to say irregularly, but without incessantly altering them, it will be sufficient to see every noon if their movements be regular ; and the superin- tendants of clocks, who have hitherto had no good method of verify- ing the time to a second, will hereafter have an opportunity of ascer- taining daily how far the movement of their pendulums is correct. (Bui. de Sciences.) 32 ON PREDICTING THE WEATHER BY THE BAROMETER. On Predicting the Weather by the Barometer. It is now a considerable time since the barometer was proposed as a a proper instrument for predicting the weather; and hence it obtained the name of weather glass. Accordingly, rules for this purpose have been given by Dr. Halley, Dr. Hutton, Messrs. Pascal, Patrick, Rowning, Changeux, de Luc, Clarke, Dalton, and many others, from whose writings we have collected the following rules. When the mercury in the barometer rises, it is a sign of fair wea- ther, attended with heat, if in summer, but frost in winter. If the mercury falls, it denotes rain, or wind, or perhaps both. If the mercury rises suddenly during the time of rain, the ensuing fair weather will not continue "long ; but if the rise is gradual, and continues for several days, a continuance of fair weather may be ex- pected. If the mercury falls suddenly several divisions, it is a sign that the succeeding rain will not be of long duration. But if the mercury continues to fall regularly for several days, rain or wind, or perhaps both, will be of considerable duration. The mercury falling considerably in autumn, winter, or spring, in- dicates gales of wind, commonly attended with rain, snow, or sleet; but, in summer, it denotes rain, and probably thunder. The mercury is low with high winds, and still lower if accompanied with rain. If the mercury falls quickly in very warm weather, thunder showers may be expected soon after. If the mercury be in an unsettled and fluctuating state the weather has the appearance of being very changeable. If the mercury has been stationary during several days, its surface must be carefully observed, to ascertain whether it is rising or falling. For this purpose, let the exact figure of the surface of the mercury be observed ; then shake the tube a little, and observe if the mercury is more or less convex or concave. If it is more convex, it is a sign the mercury is rising ; if the same as before, it is stationary ; but if less, that it has attained its greatest altitude at that time, and will fall soon. If the mercury was concave before the tube was shaken, and more concave afterwards, the mercury is falling ; if of the same concavity, or nearly so, it is stationary ; but if less concave it is rising. Between the tropics, there is . little variation in the height of the mercury in the barometer ; and the more distant any place is from the equator, the greater is the range of the mercury. Thus, at St. He- lena, the extreme variation is very little ; at Jamaica it is only about three tenths of an inch ; at Naples it seldom exceeds an inch. In England the extreme range amounts to about 2^ inches ; and at Pe- tersburgh to 3 J- inches nearly. ON ASCERTAINING THE LONGITUDE, &C. 3*3 On the. Methods proposed for ascertaining the Longitudes and Latitudes of Places by Magnetical Instruments. THE facility and readiness with which the longitudes and latitudes of places upon the surface of the earth might be ascertained, by means of magnetical instruments, if their performance could be depended upon, has at various times brought forward the proposals of instru- ments, and calculations made expressly for the purpose; but the ac- tual experiments made on those plans have constantly shewn, that both the instruments and the calculations are insufficient to answer that object; and the principal reason of the failure is the uncertainty of the motion of the magnetic poles of the earth, upon which the variation of the compass principally depends. That those poles (which may be considered to be the centres or focuses of all the magnetic bodies contained in the earth) do not remain fixed, but that they do actually move from place to place, is sufficiently evinced by the results of accurate observations ; and no modern writer seems to entertain a doubt about it. The variation of the declination, or the change of variation, is principally attributed to the motion of those poles ; but the difficulty consists in determining whether this motion is regular or irregular, viz. whether it may, or may not, be foretold by calculation, according to any rule what- soever. That nature is regular in her works, and that every natural opera- tion depends upon adequate causes, no person, who is at all ac- quainted with philosophy, can possibly deny. But when a certain phenomenon depends upon the combination of a variety of causes, some of which, and perhaps all of them, arR out of the reach of our senses, and of calculation, we call it irregular or accidental; not for want of a natural dependance upon adequate causes, but because we are unable to discover and ascertain the laws of that dependance. Thus we know that the temperature of the atmosphere in London de- pends on the time of the year, on the point from which the wind blows, on the clearness of the air, &c. yet no one can foretel the precise degree of heat that will be indicated by the thermometer on a particular day of the next year ; because, in the first place, we are not acquainted with all the concurring causes, and secondly, because, from the action of those causes upon each other, their ultimate effect upon the body of the earth becomes the result of an immense and incommensurable combination. With respect then to magnetism, we must first endeavour to dis- cover the causes which occasion the motion of the magnetic poles of the earth ; and secondly, we must consider whether the effects of those causes may or may not be subjected to calculation. The projectors of the methods for ascertaining the longitude and latitude by means of the variation compass, and of the dipping needle, generally frame hypotheses of regular movements, and establish upon them all their rules and calculations, and overlook the natural causes of irregularity or uncertainty. But hypotheses that are not founded upon a constant coincidence of effects, and especially when 34 ON ASCERTAINING THE LONGITUDE, &C. they are insufficient to account for all the phenomena, cannot be con- sidered as guides in the investigation of future events. The magnetic poles of the earth have been supposed to be four in number; though they are at present generally, and more properly, thought to be only two. They have been supposed to reside on the surface of the earth, and to move upon it at a certain annual rate : They have been sup- posed to be fixed to a sort of nucleus within the earth, and to move along with it either from east to west, or from west to east : They have been supposed to be in the atmosphere ; and in short, the con- jectures have been very numerous; but let the hypothesis be what it will, we have no reason to believe that their motion is so regular as to be foretold, which will more evidently appear from the following reasons. In the investigation of natural properties, when they are out of the reach of actual observation or calculation, the imagination must start with, and be guided by the analogy of, established facts and laws; otherwise the probability of being right vanishes entirely. Agreea- bly to this rule, if we attempt to form conjectures relative to the mag- netic poles of the earth, we must in the first place say, that as the magnetic polarity has been found to be a property only of iron or ferruginous bodies, therefore it is likely that the magnetic poles of the earth reside not in the atmosphere, but in the ferruginous bodies con- tained in the earth. Secondly, we have no reason whatever to believe that the earth contains a moveable nucleus or kernel, but we know that in a magnet, whether natural or artificial, the poles frequently change their places, though the magnet has no nucleus ; and there- fore the magnetic poles of the earth may be susceptible of motion independent of a nucleus. Thirdly, it is natural to suppose that the same causes, which have been found to alter the situation of the poles of a magnet, act in the same manner upon the earth, and occasion the motion of its poles. Those causes, and the method of manifest- ing their effects, may be reduced to four ; viz. the action of one mag- net upon the other; the action of heat and cold; the chymical alte- ration or decomposition of the substance affected with magnetism ; and, lastly, the mere mechanical derangement of parts. That all those causes take place in the earth, nobody can deny ; and of course it seems to be as evident, as the nature of the subject will admit of, that the motion of the magnetic poles is governed by the concurrence of all those causes. So far we have considered only the motion of the magnetic poles of the earth, which undoubtedly govern the general variation of the magnetic needle; but if we also take into the account the local causes, which have been indisputably found to affect the needle in particular places, such as the vicinity of great tracts of land, pro- montories, volcanos, &c. we must acknowledge that the prospect is very discouraging, and the probability of our ever becoming able to ascertain the longitude and latitude by means of magnetical instru- ments, seems almost to vanish. In fact, when we examine the differ- ent projects hitherto published, and compare their results, we find an astonishing diversity as well among themselves, as between them and actual observations. TABLE OF LATITUDES AND LONGITUDES. TABLE Of the Latitudes and Longitudes of the Principal Observatories in the World, from the latest and most accurate Observations. Names of Places. Latitude. Londitude. In Degrees. In Time. 52 22 17 N. 4 53 15 E. 6 37 30 W. 106 51 45 E. 13 22 15 E. 11 21 30 E. 8 48 E. 17 2 18 E. 10 32 E. 19 2 30 E 6 17 22 W. 7 34 E. 9 35 18 E. 8 24 42 W. 28 55 15 E. 12 35 6 E. 19 57 9 E. 18 38 5 E. 26 42 E. 13 43 1 E. 6 20 30 W. 3 10 21 W. 11 15 45 E. 9 22 15 E. 8 58 E. 4 16 OW. 10 44 E. 9 56 30 E. 000 6 7 55 W. 15 45 E. 12 21 45 E. 4 29 13 E. 8 54 15 E. 9 8 30 W. 5 47W. 3 42 15 W. 14 30 35 E. 8 28 E. h. m. s. 19 33 E. 26 30 W. 7 7 27 E. 53 29 E. 45 26 E. 35 12 E. 1 8 9 E. 42 8 E. 1 16 10 E. 25 9W. 30 E. 38 21 E. 33 39 W. 1 55 41 E. 50 21 E. 1 19 49 E. 1 14 32 E. 1 46 48 E. 54 52 E. 25 22 W. 12 41 W. 43 3 E. 37 29 E. 35 52 E. 17 4W. 42 56 E. 39 46 E. 000 24 32 E. 1 3W. 49 27 E. 17 57 E. 35 37 E. 36 34 W. 23 W. 14 49 W. 58 2 E. 33 52 E. Armagh 54 21 15 N. 6 9 S. 52 31 45 N. 44 30 12 N. 53 4 38 N Berlin Breslaw 51 6 30 N. 52 16 29 N. 47 29 44 N. 36 32 N. 52 12 43 N. 51 19 20 N. 40 12 30 N. 41 1 27 N. 55 41 4 N. 50 3 38 N. 54 20 48 N. 58 22 47 N. 51 2 50 N. 53 23 13 N. 55 57 57 N. 43 46 41 N. 47 25 40 N. 44 25 N. 55 51 32 N. 50 56 8 N. 51 31 50 N. 51 28 39 N. 43 7 2 N. 51 28 37 N. 51 20 16 N. 52 9 30 N. 53 8 30 N. 38 42 24 N. 51 30 49 N. 40 24 57 N. 35 53 N. 49 29 18 N. Buda Cadiz Cambridge (St.M. Steeple) Cassel Coimbra Constantinople (St.Sophia) Copenhagen Dantzic Dorpat Dublin Florence St. Gall (Switzerland) . . Genoa Glasgow xotha (Seeberg) . . . Gottingen Greenwich Kew Leipsic _ the eye is then to be applied to the upper hole in the sight vane ; otherwise, to the lower hole : and, in this case, the quadrant is to be held so that the sun may be bisected by the line joining the silvered and transparent parts of the glass. The moon is to be kept as nearly as possible in the same position, and the image of a star is to be observed in the silvered part of the glass, adjacent to the line of separation of the two parts. There are two different methods of taking observations with the quadrant. In the first of these the face of the observer is directed towards that part of the horizon immediately under the sun ; and is therefore called the fore observation. In the other method, the ob- server's face is directed to the opposite part of the horizon, and con- sequently his back is towards the part under the sun, and is hence called the back observation. This last method of observation is to be used only when the horizon under the sun is obscured, or rendered indistinct by fog, or any other impediment. This quadrant was first proposed by Newton, but improved, or perhaps re-invented, by Hadley. Its operation depends on the effect of two mirrors which bring both the objects of which the angular distance is to be measured at once into the field of view ; and the inclination of the speculums by which this is performed serves to determine the angle. The ray proceeding from one of the objects is made to coincide, after two reflections, with the ray coming imme- diately from the other* ancl since the inclination f the reflecting surfaces is then half the angular distance of the objects, this inclina- tion is read off on a scale in which every actual degree represents two degrees of angular distance, and is marked accordingly. There is also a second fixed speculum placed at right angles to the movea- ble one, when in its remotest situation, which then produces a deviation of two right angles in the apparent place of one of the objects, and which enables us, by moving the index, to measure any angle between 80 and 90. This operation is called the back observation ; it is however seldom employed, on account of the difficulty of adjusting the spe- culum for it with accuracy. The reflecting instrument originally invented by Hooke was arranged in a manner somewhat different. OF THE CALENDAR. 67 OF THE CALENDAR. ALTHOUGH we have completed the systematic part of this work, we deem it necessary to add a short account of the Calendar, on account of its great importance in regulating time, and preserving the seasons and particular days to the same time of the year. And to render the work as complete as possible, we shall also add the method of performing the most interesting and important calculations in Astronomy ; which we hope to do in a more simple and intelligible manner than what is to be found in works which profess to treat of this subject more fully than we intend to do. Having already treated fully of the change of seasons and the regulation of time, we shall only observe here, that the tropical year exceeds the civil year, five hours, forty-eight minutes, forty-nine seconds. Now if this difference were not attended to, the seasons would soon happen in a different time of the year from what they do at present. This circumstance was known long before the real length of the year was ascertained ; and to prevent it from taking place, the Romans inserted intercalary days ; but without much regularity, till the time of Julius Caesar, who observed that the year was almost 6 hours longer than 365 days : he therefore added a day every fourth year, which made that year 366 days. This intercalary day was counted the 24th of February, and was called by the Romans, sexto calendas Martias, or the sixth of the calends of March ; there was, therefore, in that year two sixths of the calends of March, whence it was called Bissextile. To find Bissextile or Leap Year. Rule. Divide the given year by 4; if nothing remain, that year is leap year; but if 1, 2, or 3, remain, it is as many years after leap year. Example. Let it be required to find if the year 1825 be leap year, or the 1st, 2d, or 3d after it ? 1825 -f- 4 rr 456 with a remainder of 1 ; therefore it is the first after leap year. Note. Even centuries not divisible by 4 are not reckoned leap years, such as 1800, 1900, 2100, &c. ; but 2000, 2400, &c. are reckoned leap years. OF THE DOMINICAL LETTER. It has long been customary to distinguish each day throughout the year by one of the seven first letters of the alphabet ; viz. A, B, C, D, E, Is G. The first, A, is affixed to the first day of January; the next, B, to the second ; C to the third, and so on to the seventh, G; then A to the eighth, B to the ninth, &c. to the end of the year. By this means we know, that if any letter be prefixed to any day of P 58 OF THE CALENDAR. the week, the same letter will represent the same day of the week throughout the year. If the 1st day of January, marked by the letter A, be a Sunday, all the other days of the year, which shall have the letter A prefixed to them, will also be Sundays. If the 3d of January, for which the letter C stands, be Sunday, then all the days of the year, marked by that letter, will be Sundays, and for that reason it is called the Dominical or Sunday Letter : the following letter will also represent the Mondays, and so on with the others. As a common year consists of 365 days, or 7 times 52, and one more, it follows that the letter A, which we prefix to the first day of the year, ought also to represent the last, and if it commenced on a Sunday, it would end on Sunday, and of course the next year would begin on a Monday, and the 7th would be Sunday, which is marked by the letter G ; that letter will then be the Dominical letter, and as this year began on Monday, it will therefore end with a Monday, and the 3d year will begin on a Tuesday ; then the 6th of January, marked F, will be Sunday, and that letter the Dominical letter for the year. In the same way will E become the Dominical letter for the 4th year, D the 5th, and so on in this retrograde order. If every year consisted exactly of 365 days, in the course of seven years, the same day of the month would fall on the same day of the week ; but, as every 4th or leap year consists of 366 days, which is equal to 7 times 52, and two more ; therefore if a leap year begin on a Sunday, it will end on a Monday, and the following one will begin on a Tuesday ; of course Sunday will fall on the 6th of January, and F will be the Dominical letter for the year after Bissextile, sup- posing A to have been the Dominical letter for Bissextile. By means of Bissextile, the order of the Dominical letters is inter- rupted every 4 years, but again returns after 4 times 7 or 28 years. This is what is called the Solar Cycle, after which the days of the month resume the same order as before. Because every Bissextile consists of 366 days, the intercalary day is added to the end of Fe- bruary, which, in that year, will have 29 days, and therefore the first Dominical letter in March will fall a day sooner than in common years, so that leap year will have two Dominical letters, the one serving to the 29th of February, and the other the remainder of the year. It is supposed that the Solar Cycle commenced 9 years A. C., and that it was leap year ; therefore to find what year of that Cycle any proposed year is ; to the given year add 9, and divide the sum by 28, the remainder, if any, is the year of the Cycle, and the quotient shows the number of Cycles since the birth of Christ : if nothing remain, it is the 28th year of the Cycle. Example. What year of the Solar Cycle is 1825? 1834 1825 + 9 = ~rg- zz 65 Cycles, and 14 remains, which is the Solar Cycle. OF THE CALENDAR. $$ ' ' . To find the Dominical Letter. Rule. To the given year of our Lord add its 4th part, neglecting any remainders; divide the sum by 7, and the remainder taken from 8, will be the index of the Dominical letter in common years, (remem- bering that A is 1, B 2, C 3, &c.) but if nothing remain after dividing by 7, then A is the Dominical letter in common years. In leap ^years, to this letter is prefixed its preceding one. in the retrograde order which these letters take, which becomes the Domi- nical letter after the month of February. Example. Required the Dominical letter for the year 1825 ? Here, 1825 divided by 4 is 456, which added to 1825 is 2281, and this divided by 7, leaves a remainder of 6, which taken from 8, leaves 2 for the index of the letter ; therefore B is the Dominical letter for that year. OF THE GOLDEN NUMBER. As it is well known that the periodical returns of the Sun and Moon are constantly the same, and that the moon moves nearly 13 times faster than the sun, it follows, that, after a certain number of revolutions, these two bodies will again be in conjunction in the same place of the heavens. A Greek astrononmer, named Meton, discovered, that the space of time necessary to bring this phenomenon about was 19 years : this period has, on that account, been called the Metonic Cycle ; and was very much used by the ancients for determining the times of new and full moon. For, according to that period, the new and full moon ought to happen the same day, and at the same hour of the day, ac the end of every 19 years. Therefore, if the day and hour of any new or full moon be known in the interval of 19 years, all the new and full moons, for the preceding and following years, will be known. At the time of the Council of Nice, where the question of fixing the Feast ofEaster was discussed, this cycle, of which they made so much use, served as the foundation of their computations. They had found by observation, that in the first year of the cycle the new moons happened on the 23d of January, 21st February, 23d March, &c. opposite to these days, in the calendar, they wrote 1. They had also found, that, in the second of the cycle, the new moons happened on the 12th January, 10th February, 12th March, &c. opposite these they wrote 2 ; and so on for the other years of the cycle. By this means the year of the cycle being given, they found, by inspec- tion, all the new moons of that year, in the same column of the calendar ; and, on account of the great use of those numbers, they were written in characters of gold. Hence the year of the cycle has received the name of the Golden Number. To find the Golden Number. Rule. To the given year add 1 ; divide the sum by 19. The P2 OF THE CALENDAR. quotient is the number of cycles elapsed since the commencement of the Christian era, and the remainder will be the golden number from the last cycle. Example. Required the golden number for the year 1825 ? Then 1825 + 1 = - - - z= 96 cycles, and 2 remains, 1" which is the golden number. As the solar year exceeds the lunar year by 10 d 21 h 0' 11", or nearly 11 days, these intercalary days are named the Epact. The epact is nothing when the golden number is 1. It is 11 when the golden number is 2; 22, or twice 11, when the golden number is 3; and when the golden number is 4, the epact is 3 times 11, or 33, or rather 3, because, when the number is more than 30, the excess i* called the epact. To find the Epact Rule. From the golden number of the given year subtract 1, mul- tiply the remainder by 1 1, and divide the product by 30, if it exceeds that number ; the remainder will be the epact. Example. Required the epact for the year 1825, the golden number being 2 ; 2 1 = 1 x 11 = 11, and therefore 1 is the epact. If the epact, for any year, be subtracted from a mean lunation, or 29 d 12 h 44' 3", the remainder will be the mean new moon in January for that year ; and as that month consists of 31 days, or a day and a half more than a mean lunation, if to the epact we add this day and a half, and subtract the sum from a mean lunation, as above, we shall obtain the time of new moon in February ; and as that month, in common years, consists of 28 days, the months of January and Fe- bruary together make 59 days, or very nearly two lunations, the new moon in March will therefore fall nearly at the same time of that month, as in the month of January. By augmenting the epact in this manner, by the excess of each month above a mean lunation, and retrenching from that sum a lunation, or 29 d 12 h 44' 3", we shall have the mean new moon for every month in the year. Likewise, by adding half a lunation, or 14 d 18 h 22' to the day of new moon, we shall have the day of full moon. But, to avoid fractions, we generally give 30 days to a lunation or synodic period, and add nothing to the epact for January and 2 for February. For March we add 0, for April 2, for May 2, June 3, July 4, August 5, September 7, October 8, Novem- ber 9, and for December 10.* This method will not differ above half a day from the time of the true conjunction, and often agrees very nearly; therefore it may be accounted sufficiently exact for ordinary purposes. In the same manner, we add 15 days to have the day of the following full moon. * These numbers are termed the numbers of the month. OF THE CALENDAR. 61 For example, the epact for 1814 was 9, which subtracted from 30, leaves 21 for the day of new moon in January and also in March For February, we add 2 to the epact, and take 11, the sum, from 30 and there remains 19, the day of new moon in February. For April, we add 2, and take the sum from 30, and the day of new moon for April is the 19th. For May, we add 2, and the new moon is the 19th, and so on. As the epact of any year determines the number of days elapsed from the last new moon to the first day of that year, if we wish to know the moon's age on any day of any month, we only need to add the number for that month, as given above, the epact, and day of the month into one sum, and if it be less than 30 it be the moon's age on that day, but if the sum exceed 30, that quantity must be retrenched. To find the Time of the Moon's Southing. As the moon, at a mean rate, comes to the meridian 49 minutes later on any day than the preceding day, multiply her age by 49, and the product is the time of her southing in minutes ; or multiply her age by 4, and divide by 5, the quotient is the hours, and the remainder multiplied by 12, the minutes when she is south, or on the meridian. To find the Time of high Water at a known Place. Common Method. Rule. To the time of the moon's southing add the time that it is high water at the given place on the days of full and change, the sum, if under 12, is the hour of high water in the afternoon of that day ; if it exceed 12, subtract 12 h 24' ; from this again take 24 minutes, and it will be the time of high water in the forenoon of the given day. It is however necessary to remark, that this method is only an approxima- tion, and may, on some occasions, be an hour, or even an hour and a half, wrong. CYCLES, EPOCHS, &C. If we multiply the solar and lunar cycle together, that is 28 and 19, we shall have a third period of 532, which is called the Victorian or Dionysian Period. At the end of the above number of years, not only the new and full moons return to the same days of the months, but to the same day of the week, and also the same Dominical letters, and all the moveable feasts return in the same order. On this account it is called the Great Pascal Cycle. To find the year of the Victorian Period answering to a current year, because the birth of Christ happened in the 457th year of that period ; to the year of our Lord add 457 years, and divide the sum by 532, the remainder will be the year of the period. Example. Required what year of the Victorian Period the year 1825 was? 1825 +457 =rf = 4, and there remains 154, the year oi the 532 Victorian Period. 6'2 OF THE CALENDAR. Besides the cycles of the sun and moon, the Romans employed another cycle, which they called the Cycle of Indiction. It was a period of 15 years, but had no respect to the movement of any of the heavenly bodies. It is believed that it was established to exact certain tributes or taxes of the provinces. The Emperor Justinian ordered that it should be observed or no- ticed in the public acts ; and the Popes still use it in their Bulls, and they fix the commencement of it to the calends of January, but the Romans gave it another epoch. The fourth year of this cycle cor- responds to the first of the Christian era ; therefore, to find what year of the cycle corresponds to any given year of the Christian era, add 3 to the given year, and divide the sum by 15, the remainder is the year of Indiction. Example. What year of the Indiction was the year 1825 ? 1825 + 3= =121, and 13 remains for the yea; of Indiction. OF PERIODS AND EPOCHS. The continued multiplication of the solar, lunar, and indiction cycles, that is, 28, 19, and 15, gives what is called the Great Julian Period* of 7980 years, which is supposed to have commenced 764 years before the creation, and that then the three cycles began at the same time. It is not yet completed, and it comprehends all the other periods, cycles, and epochs. There is not more than one year in all the period that has the same number for the three cycles, and therefore if historians had marked the three cycles in their annals for every year, there could have been no dispute respecting the time that any event happened. The birth of Jesus Christ took place in the 4713th year of the Julian Period. Therefore, to find what year of that period corresponds to any current year, add 4713 to the given year, and the sum is the year of the Julian Period. In this manner, the year 1825 will be found to be the 6538th year of the Great Julian Period. These are the principal periods ; but there are others less used, such as the year of Jubilee among the Jews, which was composed of seven years of Sabbaths, and returned in about 49 or 50 years. The Olympiads among the Greeks, which consisted of four years ; and the great Platonic Year, so celebrated among historians, which contained the entire revolution of all the stars from the point from whence they set out to the same again. As there are in the heavens certain fixed points from which astro- nomers begin their calculations, historians have also other fixed points, which they call eras or epochs, from whence they set out in fixing the time of any event. The most ancient of these is the Creation of the World, the next i* that of the Deluge, 2956 years before the birth of Jesus Christ ; * From Julius Scaliger, its Inventor. OF THE CALENDAR. 64 the third is that of the Olympiads, which began in Greece 776 years before Christ, in the 3938th year of the Julian period, the solar cycle being then 18, the lunar cycle 5, and the Roman indiction 8. The next remarkable epoch is that of the foundation of Rome towards the end of the third year of the 6th Olympiad, 753 years before Jesus Christ, in the 3961st year of the Julian Period, the cycle of the sun being then 13, the cycle of the moon 9, and the indiction 1. The next in order of time is that of Nabonassar, king of Babylon, to famous in astronomy. It has been employed by Ptolemy, Alba- tegnius, Alphonso, Copernicus, and many others, as the most proper era for calculating the motions of the stars. It began, according to Ptolemy, in the 4th of the calends of March, on a Friday, 747 years before Jesus Christ, in the year 3967 of the Julian Period, the first year of the 8th Olympiad, the solar cycle being 19, the lunar cycle 15, and the indiction 6. After this epoch we have that of Alexander the Great, 424 Egyp- tian years after the commencement of the era of Nabonassar, for Alexander died at Babylon in the 33d year of his age, the first year of the 1 14th Olympiad, on the 3d of the month Desii, according to some historians, but according to others, on the 23d or 27th of the Julian calendar, which is the 20th of May according to the one, and the 9th or 23d June according to the other, and according to some the 25th July. But the astronomers who have employed those epochs, as Alba- tegnius and others, fix it to the 12th of November, a Sunday at mid- day, the first day of the Egyptian month Thoth, 324 years before Jesus Christ, in the 4390th year of the Julian Period, 279 years before the commencement of the Julian Epoch, and 424 complete Egyptian years after the commencement of the era of Nabonassar. The era of the Syrians and Chaldeans began in the reign of Seleu- cus Nicator, who succeeded Alexander the Great, and reigned in Syria and in part of Africa, after the death of Alexander the Great The Julian epoch, adopted by Julius Caesar, began on the 1st of January of the year of the Confusion, which is found to have been on a Tuesday. This prince, seeing that the year established by Numa Pompilius, the second king of Rome, consisted only of twelve lunar months, aad that such a division of the year did not accord with the sun, ordered, in the fourth year of his consulship, 708 years after the foundation of Rome, in the 731st year of the Olympiads, 45 years before the birth of Jesus Christ, that, in future, the year should con- sist of 365 days 6 hours, which Was afterwards, and is still, called the Julian Year. The Spanish Era began in the reign of Augustus, in the 7th year of the Julian Era, 38 years before Jesus Christ, 715 years after the foundation of Rome, and in the 738th year of the Olympiads. It is said it was occasioned by the division ef the empire. Spain was given to Augustus, and when he first took possession, to render that day memorable, it was fixed upon for an epoch, and computed from afterwards, Ab Exordia Regni Augusti These four words were afterwards abridged, and reduced to the initial letters. This, accord- 04- OF FINDING THE LATITUDE OF A PLACE. ing to some authors, was the origin of the word AER A, which now serves to mark the epoch from whence years are reckoned. The next epoch following in the order of time, the most renowned, and the best known of any, is the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ, which, on that account, is called the Christian Era. It began the first minute after the 31st December immediately after his birth, which was on a Saturday, in the 4714th year of the Julian Period, 753 years after the foundation of Rome, in the 747th year of Nabonassar, and 324 years after the death of Alexander the Great, the solar cycle being 10, the lunar cycle 2, and the Roman indic- tion 4. There are other periods less used, as that of the Emperor Diocle- sian, beginning on the 21st April, in the 284th year of Jesus Christ, and 4997 of the Julian Period. There is also the Epoch of the Ethio- pians, of the Abyssinians, and of the Martyrs, because of the great persecution that the Christians suffered in that reign. There is also the Epoch of the Turks, which is called the Hegira, and which began with the Flight of Mahomet from Mecca to go to Gabriel, on Tuesday the 16th July, in the 622d year of the Christian Era, at which time Mahomet preached and spread his fake doctrine. That of the Persians is named the Jesdegird, from the name of one of their kings, who died on Wednesday the 16th July, in the 632 year of the Christian Era. The Jews, in their Calendar, reckon the creation of the world to have taken place 3760 years before the Christian Era, To Draw a Meridian Line. UPON a plain board, set parallel to the horizon, describe several concentric circles ; in the centre of these fix a gnomon, or stile, ex- actly perpendicular to the plane of the board, and of such a height as the shadow of it may fall upon the circumference of all the circles at different times of the day : mark the point where the top of the stile falls in the forenoon, which will be on the circumference of one of the circles ; then watch the time when the shadow falls on the same circle in the afternoon ; and a line drawn from the centre or stile bisecting the distance between these points will be in the direction of the true meridian. The reason of several circles being drawn, is to observe the shadow of the stile on any of them, in case the sun should not be shining out in the afternoon, when he would throw a shadow on the same circle ; and also to perform the same operation with each circle, in order to ensure accuracy, by taking the mean of the observations. The best time of the year for doing this, is about the time of the summer solstice, when the daily difference of declination is least. The reason of this opposition may easily be perceived for at equal distances from the meridian, the suu will have equal altitudes, and, *>f course, the shadow of any object will have the same length. OF FINDING THE LATITUDE OF A PLACE. 65 Of finding the Latitude of a Place. THE latitude of any place is equal to the altitude of the pole above the horizon of that place ; therefore the poles will appear in the ho- rizon of a place which has no latitude, or that is on the equator. This problem is nothing else, than finding the elevation of the pole above the horizon ; but as there is no star exactly in the pole of the heavens, take any star which is not more than 8 or 10 from the pole, and observe with a quadrant its greatest and least meridianal altitudes; then if both observations are on the same side of the zenith, half the sum of the altitude is the latitude. If the ob- servations are on different sides of the zenith, half the difference of the altitudes is the co-latitude. Note. There will be about twelve hours between the observations. Of the Magnitude of the Earth. To find the magnitude of the earth is a problem of such importance in astronomy, that it has been attempted by some of the ablest mathe- maticians, in almost every age, since the days of Eratosthenes to the present. The French mathematicians, by connecting a series of triangles, have lately measured the distance from Dunkirk to For- mentera, which corresponds to an arc of the meridian, of 12 22' 13"-395 ; and from this extensive base the circumference of the earth is computed to be 24,855-42 English miles. A degree of the meridian has been measured in different latitudes, by several astronomers, in order to ascertain the true figure of the earth, as well as to determine its magnitude. Mapertius, along with some other mathematicians, measured a degree in Lapland, at lat. 66 20', and found it 57,438 toises. Another, by La Hire, at latitude 49 22', which was found to be 57,074 toises. Toises. By Cassini and La Caille, at latitude 45 = 57050 By (Pennsylvania) lat. 39 =: 56888 By Bescovich . . . .43 = 56979 By Juan and Ulloa . . . 33 18' = 57037 By Dolumbert (France) . . 46 12' = 57018 By Bouguer (Equator) ... = 56753 By De la Condamini . . 56749 A T*ise is = 1-06577 fathoms. By comparing these numbers with each other, and taking the arithmetical mean of the whole, the equatorial axis is to the polar, as 230 to 228-92974, which is nearly what Sir I. Newton made it by calculation long before. From this it is plain the earth is not exactly spherical, but is a kind of oblate spheroid, flattened at the poles. This proportion makes the equatciial axis exceed the polar by about 34 miles, but some think this statement rather exceeds the truth, and give the compression at -j^j.^j 25*66 miles. 66 TO FIND THE OBLIQUITY OF THE ECLIPTIC. The method of performing the operation of measuring a degree of the meridianal arc, and its corresponding arc of the earth's sur- face, is abundantly simple in theory, although there is scarcely any operation more difficult in execution. It is performed by measuring a base line as nearly as possible in the direction of the meridian, then finding exactly the difference of latitude between the extremities of the base line. Then, as the difference of latitude or celestial arc is to the measured base line, so is one degree of the celestial arc to tho length of a degree of the earth's surface, in the same measure as the base line was taken. In a similar manner may the circumference of the earth's orbit be obtained from knowing the sun's parallax : thus, smd. semids. * 8-f" : 360 : 1 :: 149538, the circumference of the earth's orbit. To find the distance of the sun and earth; then smds. semids. 3-1416x2 : 149538 :: 1 : 23799-8, the earth's distance from the sun. From the above dimensions of the earth, it appears that one degree on the globe is nearly 69| English miles. The length of a degree may be found, very nearly, by the follow- ing theorem : Let L = the latitude, then 60761 (295-75) co-sine 2 L* will be the length of a degree. Example. Required the length of a degree of the meridian, at latitude 51? Here the co-sine of the latitude is -6293, which multi- plied by 2, and by the number 295'75, gives 370, which subtracted from 60761, leaves 60392 fathoms for the length of a degree of the meridian, at latitude 51. To find the Obliquity of the Ecliptic. Rule. -LET the meridian altitude of the sun's centre be observed, on the days of the summer and winter solstices ; the difference of those altitudes will be the distance of the tropics ; and half that dis- tance will be the obliquity of the ecliptic. Rule 2. Or if the latitude of the place be known, the meridian altitude of the sun, at the summer solstice, lessened by the co-lati- tude, will give the obliquity of the ecliptic. The obliquity of the ecliptic for the year 1825, is 23 27' 44". By comparing ancient observations with what have lately been made, it appears that the obliquity is decreasing at the rate of f" annually. Remark. By this last rule the declination of a fixed star may also be determined. * The number 60761 is the radius of the globe, at latitude 45, in fathoms. TO FIND THE PERIODIC TIME OF A PLANET. 67 To find the Time of an Equinox. AT a place, the latitude of which is known, let the sun's meridian altitude be taken the day before the equinox is expected to happen, and also the day after, then the difference between those altitudes, and the co-latitude, will be the sun's declination on those .two days when the altitudes were taken. If either of the altitudes be equal to the co-latitude, that observa- tion was made at the time of the equinox. If not proceed thus : Let A B C be a portion of the equator, and D B E an arc of the ecliptic, D the place of the sun at the first observation, E his place at the secondhand B the equinoctial point ; also, A D the declination at first observation, and E C at second ; then in the right-angled spherical triangles, A B D and E B C, there are given the obliquity of the ecliptic, and the declination A D and E C, to find the sides D B and E B, which being found, are to be added together : then say, D B -f E B is to D B, so is 24 hours to the time between the first observation and the moment the sun entered the equinoctial point. To find the Periodic Time of a Planet. THIS is best done when the planet has no latitude, or in the ecliptic, it will then be in one of its nodes ; this time is to be care- fully noted, and compared with the time when the planet has a like position, both in latitude, longitude, right ascension, and the line of its apsides. If the planet has only performed one revolution, the inter- val betwixt the two observations will be the periodic time of the planet ; but if it has performed more revolutions, the interval is to be divided by the number of revolutions, and the quotient will be the periodic time. From this it is evident, the greater the interval, or the greater the number of revolutions, the more accurately will the pe- riodic time of the planet be found. In this manner the length of the tropical year is found to be 365 d 5 h 48' 48" ; the sidereal year 365 d 6 h 9' 11" ; and the anomalistic year 365 d 6 h 14' 2". The tropical year being shorter by 20' 23" than the sidereal, shows that the sun has returned to the same point of the ecliptic, before he 08 TO FIND THE RIGHT ASCENSION OF THE STARS. has made one entire revolution with regard to the stars: conse- quently, every point, of the ecliptic must have moved backward, or in antecedentia, and this motion is called the precession or recession of the equinoxes. The quantity of the recession may be found as follows : 365 d 6 h 9' 11" : 360 :: 20' 23" : 50J" the recession of the equinoxes annually, which maks one degree nearly in 72 years ; so that in about 2160 years these points change a whole sign in the zodiac, and in 25,920 years will go entirely round the heavens, and perform what is called the grand celestial period. A sidereal revolution being performed sooner by 5' 51" than the anomalistic, shows that the line of the apsides has a motion in con- sequentia ; for, 365 d 6 h 9' 11" : 365 d 6 h 14' 2" : 5' 51" : : 15", the yearly quantity by which the sun's apogee is advanced with respect to the stars : and as the equinoxes move 50|" in antecedentia, and the apsides in 15" consequentia, their sum (65|") is the motion of the apsides from the equinoxes. The periodic time of the moon, (sometimes called a periodic or lunar month,) is the time which she takes to revolve from any point of her orbit to the same again is 27 d 7 h 43'. A synodical month, or the time which the moon takes in passing from one conjunction with the sun to another, is found to be 29 d 12 h 44' 2-8", being 2 d 5 h 1' 2*9" longer than the periodic month. This difference arises from the earth's motion in her orbit ; for while the moon is passing from one conjunction to another, the earth will have advanced considerably in her annual course ; therefore, the moon must advance as mnch more than one revolution as the earth has done since the last conjunction, before she be again in conjunction with the sun. To find the Sun's place in the Ecliptic, or his Longitude. HAVING the sun's declination and the obliquity of the ecliptic, his longitude and right ascension can easily be found, and tables formed which will give his place in the ecliptic, answering to his declination, for every day in the year. Thus, to find the sun's longitude, the rule or analogy is as follows : As sine obliq. eclip. is to sine declination, so is radius to sine sun's longitude. To find the sun's right ascension the analogy is this : As tan. ob. eclip. is to tan. declin. so is radius to co-sine right ascension. To find the Right Ascension of the Stars. HAVING the sun's place in the ecliptic, and a well-regulated clock. The clock being adjusted to sidereal time, when the sun is on the meridian, point the hand to the moment from whence the time is to be reckoned; and observe when the star comes to the meridian ON THE EQUATION OF THE CENTRE. 69 then mark the hour and minute that the hand shews on the clock* The time described by it, turned into degrees and minutes of the equator, will be the difference between the right ascension of the sun and stars. This difference being added to the right ascension of the sun, will give the right ascension of the star. The right ascension of one star being known, that of any other may be obtained by it. This is done by marking the time upon the clock, between the arrival of the star at the meridian whose right ascension is known, and the other star whose right ascension is to be found. This time, converted into hours and minutes of the equator (or mean time), will be the difference of right ascensions ; hence, by addition or subtraction, the right ascension of the star required is found. The right ascension and declination of any star being known, its latitude and longitude may be found ; and hence, catalogues may be formed of all the stars that are visible in the heavens. To find the greatest Equation of the Centre.* THE equation of the centre of any planet, means the difference of the radius victor moving in a circle, and as moving in the planet's orbit : or it is the difference between the true and mean anomaly. And as these are no where the same, but when the planet is in its perihelion or aphelion, their difference is called the equation to the centre; which is greatest when the sun is at his mean distance from the earth. Therefore, find the sun's longitude when he is at his mean distances from the earth, which is about the beginning of Oc- tober and the end of March ; then the difference of longitude will be the sun's true motion in that interval of time. Find, also, his mean motion for that interval of time : then half the difference between the true and mean motions will be the greatest equation of the centre. The sun's mean motion for any interval of time, may be found by multiplying his daily motion, 59' 8"'985647 of a day, by the days and parts of day in that interval. Or say, 365 d 242264 : 360 : : a d : a; ; if the time be reckoned from 1st of January, it will be the sun's mean anomaly; but if from Aries, it will be his longitude, as under :f Example. To find the greatest equation to the centre. In the year 1824, October 1st, at 23 h 49' 12", mean time, the sun's longitude was 6 s 9 32' 6", and in 1825, March 29th, at O h 4' 50", mean time, his longitude was s 8 50"'27 ; therefore the true differ- ence of longitude is 5 s 29 18' 27", and the interval is 178 d O h 15' 38", now 365-242264 : 360 :: 178 d 01085648 : 175-45584 zz 175 27 20" mean motion ; and 179 18' 27"=5 S 29 18' 27" 175 27 20 2) 3 5L 7 1 55' 38" The greatest equation to the centre, according to these observations, * This is called the Keplerian Problem, t Here a is the interval, and x the mean motion. 70 OF SOLAR AND. SIDEREAL TIME, To find the Equation of Time. HAVING already given sorqe account of the difference between mean and apparent time, we shall here show the manner of calculating that difference. As we have already said, it arises from two causes, and therefore consists of two parts, which being rightly put together forms the absolute equation. One of these causes is the obliquity of the ecliptic to the equator ; and the other is, the unequal motion of the earth in her orbit. The greatest part of the equation is that which arises from the former of these causes, and is found by converting the difference between the sun's longitude and his right ascension into time. His longitude and right ascension may both be found from tables, or from his declination and the obliquity of the ecliptic, by solving a right-angled spherical triangle, and hence their difference or this part of the equation may be obtained. That part of the equation arising from the unequal motion of the earth, in different parts of her orbit, is found by taking the difference of the mean and true anomalies, or the equation to the centre, and converting it into time, which is the second part of the equation ; and is to be added to, or subtracted from, the other part, according as they have like or unlike signs, in order to form the absolute equation. The proper sign is affixed to each of these quantities, by considering whether the mean time is preceded by the apparent, or is preceded by it. While the earth is going from her aphelion to her perihelion, the apparent time (depending on this cause) will be before the mean, and therefore this part of the equation must be subtracted from the appa- rent, in order to gain the mean time. But in the other semicircle of her orbit it will be after it, and therefore must be added to gain the mean. From the 14th April to the 15th June, and from the 13th August to the 23d December, that part of the equation depending on the ob- liquity of the ecliptic, is also to be subtracted from the apparent (for the apparent is then before the mean) ; but from the 15th June to the 31st August, and from the 23d December to the 14th April, it is to be added to the apparent in order to gain the mean. The earth's daily motion in apogee, or at her greatest distance from the sun, is 57' 12" ; but in perigee, or at her nearest distance, it is 61' 12". Accordingly, we have the summer longer than the winter by eight days, for she is 8 days longer in passing through the northern half of her orbit than the southern. Of Solar and Sidereal Time. A SIDEREAL day is the interval between two successive transits of a star over the meridian. This interval is uniform, for all the fixed stars, make their revolutions in equal times, owing to the uniformity of the earth's diurnal rotation about its axis. TO FIND THE ECCENTRICITY OF THE EARTH'S ORBIT. 71 The sidereal clay is shorter than the mean solar day by 3' 56"-55. This difference arises from the sun's apparent annual motion from west to east, which leaves the star as it were behind. Thus, if the sun and a star be observed on any day to pass the meridian at the same instant, the next day, when the star returns to the meridian, the sun will have advanced nearly a degree easterly, (which is his daily portion of the ecliptic) and as the earth's diurnal rotation on its axis is from west to east, the star will come to the meridian before the sun ; insomuch, that, at the end of the year, it will have gained a day on the sun, that is, it will have passed the meridian 3G6 times, while the sun will have passed it but 365 times. Now, as the sun appears to perform his revolution of 360 in a year, or 365 d 5 h 48' 48" : 360 : : l d : 59' 8"-3, which is the space the sun would describe in a day, if all the days were of an equal length ; and this space reduced to s time is = 3' 56"-55, the excess of a mean solar day above a sidereal day. Hence, it appears that the earth describes about its axis an angle of 360 59 / 8"-3 in a mean solar day, and an angle of 360 in a side- real day; therefore, as 360 59' 8"-3 : 24 h :: 360 : 23 h 56' 4"-09, the length of a sidereal day in mean solar tim,e, or the interval between two successive transits of a star over the meridian. Hence, the following general rule for converting sidereal into mean time, and the contrary. Rule. As 24 h : 23 h 56' 4"-09 : : any portion of sidereal time to its equivalent in mean time. And as 23 h 56' 4"-09 : 24 h : : any portion of mean time to its equivalent in sidereal time. To find the Eccentricity of the Earth's Orbit. HAVING the greatest equation of the centre, we can easily find the eccentricity of the earth's orbit by the following proportion : As the diameter of a circle in degrees, Is to the diameter in equal parts; So is the greatest equation of the centre in degrees, To the eccentricity in equal parts. Example. The greatest equation of the centre, is 1 55' 33"-l 925833, and the circumference of a circle whose diameter is 1, is 3- 141 5926 ; then, 3-1415926 ; 1 : : 360 : 114-59 15609 equal the diameter; andll4-5915609 : 1 :: 1-925833 : 00168061 eccentricity. Hence 1+ 0-0 168061 =1-01 6806, the aphelion distance ; and 10-016806 -983194, the perihelion distance. The eccentricity of the earth's and moon's orbit may also be found by observing the variations of the apparent diameter of the sun and moon during a complete revolution, (by a micrometer) their distance from the earth being inversely proportional to the angle which they subtend. The ratio of their greatest and least diameters is a measure of the 72 TO FIND THE SUN'S MEAN ANOMALY. relation between their greatest and least distances, and consequently enables us to ascertain the eccentricity of their orbits. Thus, if the diameter of the sun be found to measure 32' 35"-6 when the earth is in one part of her orbit; and 31' 31" when in the opposite point (which is found to be the case on the 1st January and 1st July) then will the ratio of the diameter of the orbit be to the eccentricit as 3$35"'Q 31' / 31 // =l / 4 // -6 and 64"-632 f 35"-6 + 31' eccentricity as 3$35"'Q 31' / 31 // =l / 4 // -6 and 64"-6^_32 f 35"-6 + 31' 31 " 2 ' 2 ooo" . _ = -0168 nearly what it was found to be above. 19233" This method is more liable to error than the first. . To find the Time and Place of the Sun's Apogee. THE apogee is that point of the orbit which is farthest from the focus in which the sun is placed; this problem is therefore no more than to determine at what time the planet is farthest from the sun. By the decrease of the sun's apparent diameter, we can have an idea when this happens, though other methods must be had recourse to, when we wish to determine it accurately ; one of these is as follows : On the day of two successive apsides, observe the sun's place and the time. Then if the interval between those times be equal to the half of 365 d 6 h 15' 28", and the difference of the sun's places be equal to the half of 360 1' 6" (the space he describes in the above time), the observations were made when the sun was in the apsides. But if those observed intervals of time and place differ from the above halves, take the difference between the interval of place and 180 0' 33". Then to the daily motion of the sun in apogee (which is 57' 12") the said difference and 24 h find the proportional time : which proportional time and difference being applied to the time and places of the apogeon observation, gives a time and place when it is 180 0' 33" distant from the observed perigeon place : now, if the interval of these times be 182 d 15 h 7' 44^" the times and places of the apsides are known. But if the interval of time differs from 182 h 15 d 7' 44", say, as the difference between the perigeon and apogeon daily motions, is to the daily motion of the apogee, so is the difference of the interval of time to a second correction of the time of the apogee ; which applied to the apogeon time, corrected as above, will give the true time of the sun's apogee. Also, to the last correction of time, find the proportional motion of the sun's apogee, and apply it to the last corrected place of the apogee, and the true place of the apogee will be obtained. At any Given Time to find the Sun's Mean Anomaly. THE time when the sun passes his aphelion being accurately as- certained, the mean anomaly at any time may be found, by multiply- TO FIND THE SUN'S TRUE ANOMALY. 73 ing the sun's daily mean motion (which is 59' 8") by the number of days, and parts of a day, which he is past his aphelion. Or, as the time of a tropical revolution, or solar year, is to the interval between the aphelion and given time, so is 360 to the degrees of mean anomaly. Or, from the tables of mean motions find the sun's mean motion for the given time, and this will be the mean anomaly. If the earth's orbit were circular, the sun's true place at any time would be the same as shown by the tables of his mean motion ; or the mean and true anomaly would always be the same. But the earth moving in an elliptical orbit, its true anomaly will differ from its mean, in every part of her orbit, except when she is in her perihelion and aphelion, where they coincide. To find the Sun's true Anomaly HAVING the sun's mean anomaly, and the dimensions of the earth's orbit, the eccentric anomaly may be found by the following analogy : As the aphelion distance Is to the perihelion distance ; So is the tangent of half the mean anomaly To the tangent of an arc A ; which arc being added to half the mean anomaly, gives the eccentric anomaly. The sun's eccentric anomaly, and the dimensions of the earth's orbit being known, to find the true anomaly. Rule. As tho square root of the aphelion distance 1 s to the square root of the perihelion distance ; So is the tangent of half the eccentric anomaly, To the Tangent of half the true anomaly. To find the mean Anomaly from the true being given. Rule. As the square root of the perihelion distance Is to the square root of the aphelion distance ; So is the tangent of half the true anomaly To the tangent of half the eccentric anomaly. And, As radius is to the sine of the eccentric anomaly, So is the degrees in an arc equal in length to the eccentricity; To the degrees, &c. in the arc of correction, which being added to the eccentric anomaly, gives the mean anomaly. q 74 TO FIND THE DISTANCES OF THE HEAVENLY BODIES. Greatest equation of the centre 1 55' 38" Eccentricity in parts . - . '01682 Aphelion distance . . 1-01682 Perihelion distance . . -98318 The logarithm of the ratio of the square root of the aphelion dis- tance to the perihelion distance is 0-00731 ; therefore, if this constant log. be added to the log. tangent of f the true anomaly, it will give the tangent of \ the eccentric anomaly. And in the second proportion, the arc equal in length to the eccen- tricity 1682, is also a constant quantity, which may be found as follows: 100000 : 1682 :: 57'29578 : 0- 96375 eccentricity, the log. of which is 9'98396, this added to the log. sine of the eccentric anomaly, abating 10 from the indices of the sun, gives the log. of an arc, the degrees, minutes, and seconds of which being added to the eccentric anomaly, gives the mean anomaly. To find the Distances of the Heavenly Bodies. THE distances of the heavenly bodies are found by discovering their horizontal parallaxes. The horizontal parallax of any body has already been explained to be, the angle under which the semi- diameter of the earth would appear if it were seen from that body, and this is found out by various methods. The parallax most wanted is that of the sun, by which his distance from the earth may easily be found ; and from knowing this, the true distances of the planets from the sun may be otained from their relative distances, by the second law of Kepler. Before the year 1761, the sun's parallax was always stated at 12|" ; but in the above year, Dr. Halley discovered, by the transit of the planet Venus across the sun's disc, that his parallax was only 8|" which makes his distance much greater than it was then supposed to be. Having his parallax, his distance is found by this analogy. As Tan. Parallax . . 8"-6 =5*6227666 Is to Earth's semid. .1 rr SoisRad. ... 90 = 10- To dis. in Semid. Earth 23835 -lzi 4' 3772334 Semid. Earth . . . 3981 =3-6000000 Dist. in Eng. miles 94'897'172 ir: 7'9772334. The nearer any object is to the earth the greater will be its paral- lax ; for the semidiameter of the earth must then appear under a greater angle. The moon being much nearer the earth than the sun, her parallax is much greater : at a mean rate it amounts to 57' 26", Her distance may be found by the same analogy as that given for the sun above, which will be found to be about 240,000 miles. When any object is in the horizon, its parallax is greatest, and it diminishes as the altitude of the object increases. In the zenith it will have no parallax. TO FIND THE DISTANCES OF THE HEAVENLY BODIES. 75 In most calculations, where the moon is concerned, it becomes necessary to find her parallax in altitude ; this is done by saying, As radius is to the horizontal parallax, so is the cosine of the alti- tude to the sine of the parallax in altitude. In the same manner may the distance of any planet be found, if its parallax be known. As the fixed stars have no sensible parallax, their distance can only be guessed at ; for though Dr. Bradley made many attempts, with the best of instruments, to discover the parallax of the star Draconis, he never could find its parallax to amount to a single second. The distances of Mercury and Venus may also be determined by their greatest elongations from the sun. Thus, let S be the sun, T the earth, A VB the orbit of Venus, which suppose perfectly circular, let V represent the place of Venus, at her greatest elongation, and join V T ; then in the triangle S T V, right-angled at V, the angles, viz. the angle V, and the angle S T V, the greatest elongation, and the side S T the earth's distance from the sun are known, therefore, the side S V, Venus's distance from the sun may be found, and the side TV, Venus's distance from the earth, may also be found by plane trigonometry. The distances of the superior planets may be determined by their retrograde motions, and such of them as have satellites, by the eclipses of those satellites. q2 76 TO FIND THE DISTANCES OF THE HEAVENLY BODIES. Let I represent Jupiter, S the sun, and E the earth ; join S I, and produce it to M ; then I M is the axis of his shadow, the posi- tion of which is determined by the eclipses of the satellites, and shews his heliocentric place. Join T I and produce it to N, which will be the place of Jupiter when viewed from the earth. The difference of these places gives the angle N I M, or T I S ; the elon- gation of Jupiter when viewed from the earth atT ; or the angle ITS is easily found by observation, consequently all the angles in the triangle TI S are known, and also the side ST, the distance of the earth from the sun ; therefore the sides SI and T I may both be found, and thus the distance of Jupiter from the sun or the earth is obtained. In the same figure, let I represent any of the superior planets, or any remote object of the system A, the point where the earth passes between the sun S and object I, and let I T be a tangent drawn from I to the earth's orbit, which suppose to be circular : then the earth being at A, the object I will appear in the same place both to the earth and sun ; but when the earth comes to T, supposing I to have no motion, it will appear to the earth to have gone backward by the arc that measures the angle T IS, or the angle which the earth's distance from the sun subtends at the object I ; and this angle being determined by observation, its sine will be to radius, as ST, the dis- tance of the earth from the sun, to S I, the distance of the object from the sun ; or as its co-sine to TI, the distance of the object from the earth. It is in this manner that the earth's annual parallax is used by astronomers instead of the diurnal, in rinding the distances of remote objects not belonging to the solar system ; the semidiameter of the earth being so small in comparison of those distances that they have found it necessary to substitute the semidiameter of her orbit instead of it, which is called the annual parallax. OF THE SUN'S RISING AND SETTING. To find the Periodic Time of a Planet. THE times in which the planets perform their revolutions about the sun are known by observation; therefore, having the distance of any one of them from the sun, the distance of the ethers may be found by Kepler's law. Thus, suppose the distance of the earth from the sun to be 1, and it is required to find the distance of Mercury ; 365| 2 : I 3 : 88 2 : : V05805 = -87; and so of the others. To find the Time of the Sun's Rising and Setting. Rule. To the tangent of the latitude of the place, add the tangent of sun's declination ; the sum, rejecting 10 from the index, will be the logarithm co-sine of an arch, which reduced to time, at the rate of 15 to an hour, will be the time of the rising, when the declination is of the same name with the latitude ; but the time of setting, when it is of a different name. Required the time of the sun's rising in latitude 52 12' N., on the 4th of May? The sun's declination on the 4th of May is 15 64' N. which is there- fore of the same name with the latitude. Hence, in the present example : Tan. 15 54' Log. 9-454628 Tan. 52 12 Log. 10-110318 Co-Sine 68 27' Log. 19-565046 Now, 68 27' converted into time is 4 hours 34 minutes nearly ; which is the time of the sun's rising on the 4th of May, at latitude 52 12' N. To find the Time of a Planet Rising and Setting. IN the same manner may half the time of a star or planet's conti~ nuance above the horizon be found ; but in order to find the time of its rising, this time must be subtracted from the time of its passing the meridian ; and to find the time of its setting, it must be added to the time of its passing the meridian. As the time of a planet's passing the meridian can easily be obtained from an ephemeris, and the time of its half continuance above the horizon by the above rule, it is unnecessary to give an example of computing the time of a planet rising or setting. The time of a fixed star's rising or setting is found exactly in the same manner as that of a planet. 78 REAL MAGNITUDES OF THE PLANETS. To find the Time of a Star or Planet's passing the Meridian on any Day of the Year, &c. Rule. From the right ascension of the star* subtract the right ascension of the sun, for the given day, and the remainder will be the approximated time of the star's passing the meridian. If the star's right ascension be less than the sun's, it must be increased by twenty- four hours. When the time of the star's passage over the meridian is less than twelve hours, the time is P.M.; when greater, it will be as many hours after 12 p. M. of the given day. The approximate time of a planet's passing the meridian may be found in the same manner, if its right ascension be known. To find the Real Magnitudes of the Planets. HAVING found, by observation, the apparent diameters of the planets, either at their greatest or least distance from the earth, and knowing previously the distance of the earth from the sun, and also the distance of the planets, their real magnitudes may be found by a simple calculation. Since the apparent diameters of distant bodies vary inversely as their distances, it is easy to ascertain what must be the apparent diameter of each of the planets viewed from the sun ; or, what is better, the apparent diameter of each of the planets, viewed at a distance equal to that of the sun from the earth. Example. Venus's mean distance from the sun is known to be about 68,000,000 miles, and the earth 95,000,000 miles ; ergo, when Venus is in her inferior conjunction, or nearest to the earth, she is only 27,000,000 million miles from the earth (for 9568=27). We know, from observation, Venus's apparent diameter in this position is 60"; ergo, 27 : 60" : : 95 : 17" nearly diameter of Venus, viewed at as great a distance from the sun as the earth, and the apparent diameter of the earth at the sun is known to be 17"'5 (double 8'"73 the parallax); ergo, as 17"'5 : 7912 m : : 17" : 7686 miles, the real dia- meter of Venus. In like manner, Jupiter in opposition has an appa- rent diameter of 48", his mean distance about 490,000,000 miles ; ergo, at that time his distance from the earth is 395,000,000 miles ; ergo, 395 m : 48" : : 95 m : 199", the apparent diameter of Jupiter at the distance of the earth from the sun. To find his real diameter, we have only to say, 17"-5 : 7912 111 : : 199" : 89160 m . The apparent diameter of the sun, as seen from the earth, is about 32' or 1920'; ergo, 17"'5 : 791 2 m : : 1920" : 870,000 m nearly. The real diameter of the moon and the other planets may be found in a similar manner : and hence their bulks may be easily calculated as follows : * See Table, page 10. OF THE MATTER IN THE SUN AND PLANETS. 19 The sun at his mean distance from the earth, subtends an angle of 32' 12" = 1932", and the earth at the sun 17|", therefore the sun's diameter is to the earth's diameter as 1932" to 17", or as 11 1 to 1 ; and as spheres are to each other as the cubes of their diameters, the bulk of the sun will be to the bulk of the earth as the cube of 111 J to the cube of 1, or as 1386166 to 1. The earth's diameter, as seen from the moon, subtends an angle of double the moon's horizontal parallax, which being taken at 57' 26", or 3446", the earth's must be 1 54' 52", or 6892"; when the moon's horizontal parallax is as here stated, her diameter subtends an angle of 31' 2" = 1862" ; therefore the earth's diameter is to that of the moon's as 3446" to 1862", or as 3*7 to 1 ; and her bulk will be to the moon's as 49-4 to 1. In this manner may the bulk of any of the planets be found : by first finding what angle the planet subtends from the earth, and then comparing its diameter with the earth's diameter. Note. As Venus is seen, sometimes, on the sun's disc, which is at the time she is in her inferior conjunction, or nearest to the earth, it affords an excellent opportunity of measuring her apparent diameter. The elements of the planets are 1st. long, ascending node ; 2d. eccentricity of orbit; 3d. mean longitude, 1st January; 4th. mean longitude perihelion ; 5th. secular variation of perihelion ; 6th. incli- nation of orbit; 7th. sidereal revolution ; 8th. mean distance. Method of finding the Mass of Matter in the Sun and Planets. LET F and f denote the forces by which two bodies revole in circles, whose radii are D and d in the periodic times P and p ; then, by the D d theory of central forces (Dynamics) F : f :: 2 : j^S' Now in the case of the sun and planets, the force F is the amount of the deflections of the revolving body to all the particles in the central body, which, putting M for the mass of matter in that body, M will be expressed by v^ and similarly putting m for the matter in the central body towards which the other body gravitates at the m M m D d distance d, T* therefore, jp : r^ : : p 2 : ~ and consequently D 3 d 3 M : m : : 2 : 2 . Hence it appears, that the mass of matter in the bodies that compose the solar system are directly as the cubes of the mean distances of any bodies which revolve about them, and inversely as the squares of the, times in which the revolutions are performed. The application of the above theorem to determine the quantity of matter in the sun, taking the quantity of matter in the earth as unity. The sun's distance in miles . . 93726900 The moon's distance . ... 240144 Earth's revolution in sidereal days . 365*25 Moon's sidereal revolution . . 27'322 80 OF DETERMINING THE LONGITUDE. Then by the formula : 240144 3 93726900 s tl :: m = 1:M = *" matter w the sun. Therefore M = 9372690 f * 27 ' 322 * = 332669 365-25 2 x 240144 s But this must be increased about ^th, because the moon is here- supposed to revolve about the centre of the earth, whereas she really moves about their common centre, and on this account the gravitation of the earth is estimated greater than it ought to be. Thus increased, the quantity of matter in the sun may be reckoned at 337422 times that of the earth. However this cannot be considered as very accurate, as the sun's distance from the earth is uncertain, it being deduced from his hori- zontal parallax, which is said to be only about 8"'7 or 8"*8, and an error of one-tenth of a second in the parallax will produce an error of -3*3- of the whole, for the error will vary in a triplicate proportion. In the same manner may Jupiter be compared with the earth ; by comparing the gravitation of his nearest satellite with that of the moon. By a calculation similar to the above, it appears that Jupiter contains 313 times more matter than the earth. From the periodic times and distances of the satellites of Saturn and Uranus, may also be estimated the forces by which they gravitate; and hence it is found, by calculation, that the former planet contains 103 times more matter than the earth, and the latter 17 times as much. The quantity of nfatter in those planets that have no satellites can only be guessed from the effect they produce in disturbing the motions of the other planets. The quantity of matter in the moon, however, may be determined with greater certainty, by comparing together the influence of the sun and moon in producing the tides, and the precession of the equinoxes. Hence it is found that the moon is about T J ff of the earth. The quantity of matter in each of the planets has already been stated at page 145 of this Work, to which the reader may refer for more information on this subject. To determine the Longitude of Places on the Earth. THIS is a problem of such great difficulty in practice, that, although the efforts of some of the greatest mathematicians in JEurope have been directed towards the invention of easy, practicable methods, yet none has been hitherto discovered that is not liable to errors ; these errors, it must be remarked, are not to be ascribed entirely to the theory, (which is, at least, with respect to several of the methods, accurate,) but to the practice, particularly when the observations for determining the longitude are taken at sea. Still, however, when a comparison is formed between the modern methods of solving this problem, and those which were practised two centuries ago, it will appear that very considerable advances have been made towards a perfect s htion ; and these are probably, in great measure, to be attribute^ to *^ verv handsome rewards which have been offered by OF DETERMINING THE LONGITUDE. 81 commercial nations to those who should propose the most accurate and practicable way of attaining so desirable an end. It may seem a matter of astonishment, that this question, which is probably the most interesting that ever engaged the human attention, is little more than to be able to tell what o'clock it is elsewhere ; for the longitude is found by the comparison of local or relative time ; and as the hour is easily found at the place of observation by alti- tudes, the only difficulty is, to find the time at the same instant at some other place whose longitude is known. Now as the sun, in his daily course, passes over 360 degrees of longitude in 24 hours, he passes over 15 degrees in one hour, and over any other space in this proportion ; and therefore if the difference in time between any two places be known, the difference of longitude is thence determined. Hence, if a perfect time-keeper could be constructed, it would obviate all difficulty on this subject, and render the longitude as simple a problem as the latitude ; for such an instrument being set to the time of any place whose longitude is known (suppose to that of Greenwich Observatory, from whence we reckon our longitude) it would preserve this time in all other parts of the world ; and, by com- paring this chronometer with a clock or watch properly regulated for the place of observation, the difference would show the longitude. Notwithstanding the great degree of perfection to which time- keepers have been brought, they cannot be supposed such infallible guides to the longitude as the heavenly bodies : the advantage the former have is, that of being at all times most easily consulted ; but the prudent mariner will not trust to chronometers abne, though he must use them as auxiliaries to his astronomical calculations ; for such delicate and complicated pieces of mechanism wil be ever more or less liable to be affected by the violence of motion, or the vicissi- tudes of season and climate, and, like all other productions of human art, must be subject to accident, disorder, and decay : whereas the heavenly bodies are unchangeable ; these only are the unerring time- keepers which exibit a true species of perpetual motion. There are various methods of finding the longitude by celestial observations, but all proceed upon the same principle, or tend to the same object, which is to tell the time at Greenwich Observatory, and this compared with the time at the place of observation, shews the distance east or west from Greenwich, and of course shews the lon- gitude of that place. First method : By the sun's declination. Find the ceclination of the sun at noon, from observations made upon him either at the meridian, or three or four hours from it : take the difference between this com- puted declination, and that for the noon of the same day at Green- wich, as shewn by the Ephemeris ; from which take likewise the daily difference of declination at that time, then employ the following analogy : As the daily difference of declination, is to the difference above found, so are 360 to the difference of longitude. But here a small error in the computed declination, will cause a very considerable one in the difference of longitude ; and as such an error must inevita- bly arise from considering the change of declination, during a day, as regular, this method is not to be recommended in practice. 82 OF DETERMINING THE LONGITUDE. Second method: By the moon's culminating. Seek in the Ephemeris for the time of the moon's coming to the meridian on the given day, and on the day following, and take the difference ; take also the dif- ference between their times of culminating on the same day, as found in the Ephemeris, and as observed ; then say, as the daily difference in the Ephemeris, is to the difference between the times of southing found by the Ephemeris and by observation, so are 360 to the differ- ence of longitude. Here the moon's motion is supposed to be uniform, which is not the case; therefore, since a small error in this respect, or in the time of the moon's culminating, may occasion a great error in the longitude, this method is no more to be recom- mended in practice than the former. Third method: By the distance between the moon and a known fixed star, when both are on the meridian. Let one observer take the alti- tude of the moon's centre when on the meridian (which may be done by taking the altitude of the upper or lower limb, and allowing for the semidiameter), and another the altitude of any such star in the zodiac as then happens to be on or very near the meridian. Now the right ascension of the moon will be equal to the right ascension of the star, if they were on the meridian exactly together : but if they are not on the meridian together, if their difference of culminating do not exceed eight or ten minutes, the right ascension of the moon may be found by adding or subtracting this difference to or from the right ascension of the star, according as the moon culminates after or be- fore the star. Then, knowing the day of the month, with the moon's right ascension^ examine the Nautical Almanac, and find, by propor- tion, at what time at Greenwich the moon had that right ascension. Take also the difference between the meridional altitudes of the moon and the star which is then on the meridian ; this difference (when properly corrected for dip, refraction, and parallax) will be the differ- ence of the declinations of the moon and star, whence, the declination of the star behg known, that of the moon becomes known also. Then find, by means of the Nautical Almanac, at what time on the given day, the mooi had this declination : if the time thus found agree either exactly or very nearly with the time deduced from the right ascension, take the difference between half the sum of them, and the time of the observation (determined by some of the methods before referred to), for the difference of longitude in time, whence the longi- tude in degrees, &c. may be found : but if the times thus deduced do not correspond tolerably accurately, recourse must be had to some of the following methods. Fourth method : By eclipses of the moon. These eclipses are seen at the same instant of absolute time in all parts of the earth : there- fore, if in two or more distant places where an eclipse of the moon is visible, the times of the beginning or ending are carefully observed ; as also the times when any number of digits were eclipsed ; or, which is better, the times when the earth's shadow began to touch, or to leave any remarkable spot on the moon's face ; then will the difference of the times when the observations of like kind were made, give the difference of longitude between the places of observation. Or, in- stead of comparing the observations at two different meridians, the OF DETERMINING THE LONGITUDE. 83 times of the beginning and end of the eclipse, as observed at the place the longitude of which is required, may be compared with the times of beginning and end at Greenwich, as given in the Nautical Almanac, and the longitude may be deduced from the difference of times as before : but the longitude thus found will not be so accurate as that determined by two observations, because of the inaccuracy of the lunar tables, and of the great difficulty of telling exactly the time of the first and last contact of the earth's shadow with the moon's limb. Fifth method: By the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites.. The eclipses of Jupiter's satellites afford one of the readiest, and for general prac- tice one of the best, methods of determining the longitudes of places at land : and whenever Jupiter is to be seen,* they might be applied at sea, oftener than they would be wanted, if they could be observed with sufficient accuracy in a ship under. sail. In order to find the longitude of a place at land by an eclipse of one of Jupiter's satellites, the following directions must be observed : On the day preceding the evening on which it is proposed to observe the eclipse, note the time it will happen at Greenwich, as given in the Nautical Almanac. Let the estimated longitude of the place of observation be converted into time, and, if eastward of Greenwich, added to the time of the beginning of the eclipse, as given in the Nautical Almanac ; but if the place be westward, subtracted ; and it will give the time nearly when the eclipse is to be expected at that place. Begin to observe twenty or thirty minutes sooner than the time thus estimated, and let the instant when the eclipse begins or ends be noted, as shewn by a watch previously regulated to mean time at the place of observa- tion : then the difference between this time and the Greenwich time, converted into degrees, will shew the longitude from Greenwich. If the time at Greenwich be less than the time observed, the longitude is cast; otherwise it is west. The best eclipses for finding the longitude are those of the first satellite, because its theory is most accurately settled ; but it should be observed, that its emersions are not visible from the time of Jupiter's conjunction with the sun to the time of his opposition; and the immersions are not visible from his opposition to his conjunction. A sixth method, is by the difference between the observed times of the moon and a fixed star passing the meridian of each place. But this method is attended with very considerable trouble in the calcula- tion, and is not more accurate than the methods already noticed. The last method we shall notice is that of observing the distance between the moon and the sun, or a fixed star. This is one of the most accurate methods which can be employed, and is peculiarly adapted for determining the longitude at sea. It is, therefore, the only astronomical method to which seamen have recourse to for this * An eclipse will be visible in any place, if Jupiter be 8 or more above the horizon, and the sun as much below it : whether this will or will not be the case at any place where the observation is intended to be made, may be readily found with sufficient accuracy by a celestial globe. 84 OF THE NAUTICAL ALMANACK. important purpose ; but our limits will not permit us to enlarge far- ther upon it. Variation charts have also been recommended ; but they cannot be depended upon for any length of time, as the needle is constantly changing its direction, and the law of its variation is still a secret. Explanation and Use of the Nautical Almanac or Ephemeris. THIS National Almanac is chiefly intended for nautical purposes, but it is of the greatest use in all astronomical calculations. It was begun in 1767, under the direction of the Board of Longitude, on the recommendation of Dr. Maskelyne, who had the immediate conduct- ing of it for many years. All the calculations of the Ephemeris, except those of the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites, are made according; to the apparent time by the meridian of the Royal Observatory at Greenwich : and the sun's, planets', and moon's places, with the particulars depending on them, are computed to the instant of apparent noon, or that of the sun's centre passing the meridian of Greenwich. The day is here supposed, according to the method of astronomers, to begin at noon, or twelve hours later than the civil day of the same denomination, and to be counted up to twenty-four hours, or the succeeding noon, when the next day begins. Thus the day of the month and the hour of the day are the same in this method as in the civil account at noon, and from noon till midnight; but from midnight till noon they differ. There are twelve pages for every month. The first column of the first page of each month contains the day of the week expressed con- cisely by the initial letter or letters; the second the day of the month; the third column exhibits the Sundays and Festivals of the Church of England, and other remarkable days; the last column shows at top the moon's phases, or the times of new and full moon, and of the first and last quarter or two quadratures with the sun ; beneath are con- tained miscellaneous phenomena ; namely, eclipses of the sun and moon, and occultations of planets or fixed stars not less than the " fourth" magnitude, by the moon, which can be occultations any where on the globe, between the latitudes of 60" north and 40 south ; the entrance of the sun into the several signs, and any other re- markable phenomena. The stars are expressed by Bayer's characters of reference. The conjunction of the moon or a planet with a star is denoted by prefix- ing the character of the moon or planet to that of the star, the time of the conjunction being placed immediately before. The case is the same with respect to the occultation of a star or planet by the moon, only this is further distinguished by the addition of im. or immersion, to signify the disappearance behind the moon : and em. or emersion, to signify the re-appearance of the same. Thus 8 d 16 !l 22' D 3" yf > signifies that the moon will be in conjunction with the star S ^f on the eighth day at J6 h 22', exclusive of parallax; and I0 (l D h 14' im. ff n ; 10 d 10 h 23' em. signifies that the moon will eclipse e n on OF THE NAUTICAL ALMANACK. 85 the 10th day, the immersion being at 9 h 14, and the emersion at 10 h 23' apparent time at Greenwich. The occultations set down are only those visible at Greenwich ; the circumstances of which will commonly not differ very widely in most parts of the kingdom ; but in very distant places they will differ very much, owing to the change of the moon's parallax, or it may become no occultation at all. The same may be said of eclipses of the sun. The two first columns of the second page of the month contain the day of the week and month, as before ; next follow the sun's longi- tude, right ascension in time, declination, and the equation of time with its difference from day to day. To find the sun's longitude at any time different from noon, propor- tion must be made according to its daily increase : saying, as 24 h is to the hour from noon reckoned by the meridian of Greenwich, so is the daily variation of the sun's longitude to a fourth number; which added to the sun's longitude at the preceding noon, gives the true longitude at the given time. If the time given be that of a meridian different from Greenwich, it must be first reduced thereto, by adding or subtracting the differ- ence of longitude turned into time at the rate of one hour to 15. The surf's longitude serves also to compute the aberration of the fixed stars and planets. The sun's right ascension in time is useful to the practical astrono- mer in regular observatories, who adjusts his clocks by sidereal time. It is also useful to him for converting apparent into sidereal time ; as suppose that of an eclipse of Jupiter's satellites, in order to know at what time it may be expected to happen by his clock. For this purpose the sun's right ascension at the preceding noon, together with the increase of right ascension from noon, must be added to the appa- rent time of the phenomenon set down in the Ephemeris. The sun's right ascension in time serves also to compute the appa- rent time of a known star passing the meridian : thus, subtract the sun's right ascension in time at noon from the star's right ascension in time, the remainder is the apparent time of the star's passing the me- ridian nearly ; from which the proportional part of the daily mcrease of the sun's right ascension for this apparent time from noon being subtracted, leaves the correct time of the star's passing the meridian. The sun's declination is necessary to find the latitude, whether at sea or land, from his meridian altitude observed. It is also necessary to calculate the apparent time from an observed altitude of the sun at a distance from the meridian, the latitude being given ; or to compute the time of the sun's setting or rising ; which, though a less accurate method than the former of obtaining the time, may yet be useful when that cannot be had. For any of these purposes the sun's declination must be found to the time given nearly, reduced to the meridian of Greenwich, making proportion according to the daily increase or decrease, in like manner as was shown with respect to the sun's longitude. The equation of time is a correction, which added to, or subtracted from the apparent time (according to its title at the top of the column) 86 OF THE NAUTICAL ALMANACK. gives equated or mean time, or that which should be shown by a good clock or watch. The equation of time being set down in the Ephemeris for noon at Greenwich, proportion must be made according to the daily differ- ence, to find what it should be at any given time reduced to the same meridian, as in the preceding articles. The last column of this page, containing the daily differences of the equation, is designed for this purpose. But when time-keepers are used at sea, the apparent time deduced from an altitude of the sun must be corrected by the equation of time, and the mean time found compared with that shown by the watch ; the difference will be the longitude in time from the meridian by which the watch was set, as near as the going of the watch can be depended upon. The time of the sun's semidiameter passing the meridian, page 3d, serves to reduce an observation of a transit of the preceding or subse- quent limb over the meridian to that of the centre, when only one was observed. It signifies a portion of apparent time, or even mean time, the difference being absolutely insensible upon so small an interval. From the time of the sun's semidiameter passing the meridian may also be found the time of its passing the horizontal or vertical wire of a quadrant or sextant, which on some occasions may have its use. The semidiameter of the sun is necessary to reduce the observed altitude of his upper or lower limb to that of the centre ; also to reduce the observed distance of the moon's nearest limb from the sun's nearest limb to the distance of the centres. It is also useful to astronomers to verify or ascertain the exactness of the scale of their micrometers, by comparison with the measure of the sun's horizontal diameter. The hourly motion of the sun is useful in computing solar and lunar eclipses. The logarithm of the sun's distance is useful in the calcu- lation of the places of the planets and comets. The place of the moon's node signifies its mean longitude, and is necessary for finding the equation of the equinoctial points both in longitude and right ascension, the equation of the obliquity of the ecliptic, and the devia- tions of the fixed stars in right ascension and declination. The eclipses of Jupiter's satellites are set down on the lower part of page 3d, and to mean time. They are well known to afford the readiest, and for general practice the best method of settling the longitudes of places at land; and it is by their means principally that geography has been so much reformed since the invention of teles- copes, and the construction of tables for calculating the time of their happening. The eclipses of Jupiter's satellites are observed by astronomers at land, as well in order to provide materials for improving the theories and tables of their motions, as for the sake of comparison with the corresponding observations which may be made by persons in dif- ferent parts of the globe, whereby the longitude of such places will be accurately ascertained. It is indeed to be lamented that persons, who visit distant countries, are not more diligent to multiply observa- OP THE NAUTICAL ALMANACK. 87 tions of this kind ; for want of which, the observations made by astronomers in established observatories lose half their use, and the improvement of geography is retarded. The eclipses, carefully calculated and set down in the Ephemeris, will serve to advertise them and observers in general of the times when they should attend to these observations. The immersions signify the instant of the disappearance of the satel- lite by entering into the shadow of Jupiter; and the emersions sig- nify the first instant of its appearance at coming out of the same. They generally happen when the satellite is at some distance from the body of Jupiter, except near the opposition of Jupiter to the sun, when the satellite approaches nearer to his body. Before the oppo- sition of Jupiter to the sun, the immersions and emersions happen on the west side of Jupiter, and after the opposition on the east side ; but if an astronomical telescope be used, which reverses objects, the appearance will be directly the contrary. Before the opposition, the immersions only of the first satellite are visible ; and after the oppo- sition, the emersions only. The same is generally the case with jespect to the second satellite ; but both the phenomena of the same eclipse are frequently observable in the two outer satellites. The immersions and emersions, marked with an asterisk in the Ephemeris, are those visible at Greenwich. The immersion or emersion of any satellite being carefully ob- served in any place according to mean time, the longitude from Greenwich is found immediately, by taking the difference of the ob- servation from the corresponding time shewn in the Ephemeris, which must be turned into degrees, &c. and will be east or west of Green- wich, as the time observed is more or less than that of the Ephemeris. Example. Suppose an emersion of the first satellite should be observed at the Cape of Good Hope, April 16, 1805, at 13 h 25' 35" mean time ; the time by the Ephemeris being 12 h 12' 2', the differ- ence is l h 13' 33", whence the longitude of the Cape should be 18 23' 15" east of Greenwich, because the time supposed to be observed at the Cape is more than that of the Ephemeris. The longitudes and latitudes of the planets, page 4th, serve to show where to look for them in the heavens, to enable persons less skilled to distinguish them from the fixed stars. They also show when they are in the most important points of their orbits, where it is most ma- terial to observe them. The 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and 1 Ith pages of each month contain the moon's place, and all the circumstances retating to her motion and her distancen from the sun and proper stars, from which her distances should be observed for finding the longitude at sea. For the sake of greater precision, the moon's longitude, latitude, right ascension, declination, semidiameter, horizontal parallax, with its proportional logarithm, are computed twice a day to noon and midnight, and may readily be inferred to any intermediate time with "he greatest exactness. T he moon's longitude and latitude are used in computing the dis- s from the sun and stars contained in the four last pages of the is well as the appulses to stars pointed out in page 1st, and, 8& OP THE NAUTICAL ALMANACK. jointly with her parallax and semidiameter, are necessary for com- puting the eclipses of the sun and moon, and the occultations of fixed stars and planets by the moon. They also facilitate the calculation of the longitude of any place from an observed eclipse of the sun, or occupation of a star or planet by the moon. Or, if the longitude be well known, the parallax and semidiameter serve to deduce the moon's true place in the heavens from the observation, which, com- pared with that given by the Ephemeris, shows the error of the tables at the time. The moon's semidiameter and parallax are applied in correcting almost all observations of the moon. The proportional logarithms of the moon's parallax serve further to facilitate the calcu- lations of parallaxes. The moon's right ascension and declination are useful to compute her altitude at any time, particularly at the observation of her distance from the sun or a star, supposing it was neglected to be or could not be observed properly ; which latter case may sometimes happen in the night. The moon's declination, with her semidiameter and paral- lax, serve for rinding the latitude by the meridian altitude of her upper and lower limb observed at sea. The moon's right ascension and declination also serve to compute the time from her altitude ob- served at the observation of her distance from a star ; whence the longitude may be inferred, though no altitude of the sun or a star was taken for regulating the time. The distances of the moon from sun and fixed stars, contained in the 8th, 9th, 10th, and llth pages of the month, are set down to every three hours of apparent time by the meridian of Greenwich, and are designed to prevent the necessity of a calculation by seamen and others who wish to determine the longitude by lunar observations. The configurations of Jupiter's satellites, page 12th and last, exhi- bit the apparent positions of the satellites with respect to each other, and to Jupiter, at such an hour of the evening or night as they are most likely to be observed, and serve to distinguish the satellites from one another. Jupiter is distinguished by the mark O , and the satel- lites by points with figures annexed ; the figure 1 signifying the first satellite, 2 the second satellite, &c. When the satellite is approach- ing towards Jupiter, the figure is put between Jupiter and the point; and when the satellite is receding from Jupiter, the figure is put on the other side of the point. The satellites are in the superior parts of their orbits, or farthest from the earth, when they are marked to the right hand or west from Jupiter approaching him ; or to the left hand or east of Jupiter receding from him ; but are in the inferior parts of their orbits, or nearest to the earth, when they are marked to the right hand or west of Jupiter receding from him, or to the left or east of Jupiter approaching him. The cipher O , sometimes annexed to the figure of the satellite towards the margin, signifies that it is invi- sible on the face of Jupiter; and the black mark $ signifies that it is invisible, being eclipsed in Jupiter's shadow, or behind Jupiter eclipsed by his body. THE END. Printed by Hodgson and Co. 10, Newgate-street. THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY WILL INCREASE TO SO CENTS ON THE FOURTH DAY AND TO $1.OO ON THE SEVENTH DAY OVERDUE. SEP 261934 a | 3 i $/ ! ! t ? DEC ,< 1034 1 if, *V J , ^ r f 4ft i 2 ^ nes 3 s ^ pT~ ^ MAR 221936 ? 2 ^ s ; ? 199^ ! 1 L- f ^ b P 4 S J J ^ac r T:T 5 v IT.* "z-^y \ \ ^^J"^f LD21-100m-7,'33 / c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY