Jifornia ional lity THE KING'S CLASSICS UNDER THE GENERAL EDITORSHIP OF PROFESSOR GOLLANCZ THE FALSTAFF LETTERS '/// r/.nr //.*/ Sf.n' /f/JK ff f/t///<- i /^:' THE FALSTAFF LETTERS BY JAMES WHITE ALEXANDER MORING LIMITED THE DE LA MORE PRESS 32 GEORGE STREET HANOVER SQUARE LONDON W 1904 " GOLDEN LADS AND LASSES MUST, AS CHIMNEY-SWEEPERS, COME TO DUST JAMES WHITE IS EXTINCT, WITH HIM THESE SUPPERS HAVE LONG CEASED. HE CARRIED AWAY WITH HIM HALF THE FUN OF THE WORLD WHEN HE DIED OF MY WORLD AT LEAST." " JEM WHITE, THERE NEVER WAS HIS LIKE. WE SHALL NEVER SEE SUCH DAYS AS THOSE IN WHICH JEM FLOURISHED." "A COPY OF THIS WORK SOLD AT THE ROXBURGH SALE FOR FIVE GUINEAS. WE HAVE BOTH BEFORE AND SINCE THAT TIME PICKED IT UP AT STALLS FOR EIGHTEEN PENCE. READER, IF YOU SHALL EVER LIGHT UPON A COPY IN THE SAME WAY, WE COUNSEL YOU TO BUY IT. WE ARE DECEIVED IF THERE BE NOT IN IT MUCH OF THE TRUE SHAKESPEARIAN STUFF." CHARLES LAMB. The Present Edition. This edition of the Original Letters, etc., of Sir John Falstaff has been pre- pared from the editio prince-ps, published in 1796 : " Original Letters, etc., of Sir John Falstaff and his Friends ; now first made public by a gentleman, a descendant of Dame Quickly, from genuine manu- scripts which have been in the possession of the Quickly family near four hundred years. London : printed for the author; and published by Messrs. G. G. and J. Robinsons, Paternoster Row; J. Debrett, Piccadilly; and Murray and Highley, No. 32, Fleet Street." The Dedication to " Master Samuel Irelande " is in black- letter. 1 A second edition, or rather an issue of the old 1 ;'. e. Samuel Ireland, Junior, (William Henry Ireland,) the forger of Shakespeare Manuscripts, then recently exposed by Edmund (" Edmonde") Malone. ix 2063808 copies, with a new title-page, appeared in 1797 ; " the second edition. Dedicated to Master Samuel Irelande." A reprint of the book was published in 1877, by B. Robson, 43 Cranbourn Street, Leicester Square, dedi- cated " to the dear and delightful memory of Charles Lamb " " this new edition of a book which he loved to praise." A monograph on the author was prefixed to the edition. The original frontispiece was not given. It is now reproduced for the first time. The Author. James White, Charles Lamb's schoolfellow and friend, born in 1775, his friend's junior by a few weeks, entered Christ's Hospital in 1783, and remained at the school till 1790, when he was transferred to a clerkship in the treasurer's office. Later on he became a newspaper and advertising agent. Southey records that when he first saw Lamb, at the end of 1794 or early in 1795, "his most familiar friend was White, who held some office at Christ's Hospital, and continued intimate with him as long as he lived." * Lamb, Lloyd and White were inseparable in 1798 ; the two latter at one time lodged together, though no two men could be imagined more unlike each other. Lloyd had no drollery in his nature ; White seemed 1 Southey's Life and Correspondence, 1850, vol. vi. Letter to Edward Moxon, Feb. 2, 1836. x to have nothing else. You will easily understand how Lamb could sympathize with both. White's friends have left affectionate glimpses of the charm, buoyancy and goodliness of his character ; his memory is for ever enshrined in Elia's description of " that annual feast of chimney sweepers," instituted by him, and " at which it was his pleasure to officiate as host and waiter." l In another essay, " On some Old Actors," Lamb tells a good story of " his merry friend Jem White " and Dodd the comedian. From another of White's schoolfellows, John Matthew Gutch, we learn that he was familiarly called " Sir John, from his fondness of personating Falstaff ; so successful was his imitating the character at a masque- rade that he excited the jealousy of some of the company present, supposed to be hired actors for the occasion ; who, with much ill-will, procured a rope and held it across the room (at the Pantheon in Oxford Street), and White was obliged to take a leap over the rope to escape being thrown down." 2 Gutch notes that " White married a daughter of Faulder, the bookseller, the fortunate purchaser of the copyright of Paley's works. He died, I think, in 1 Cf. In Praise of Chimney Sweepers. 2 See Memoir, ed. 1877, p. xix. xi 1822, leaving a widow and three children." But in 1822, the year of Lamb's contribution to The London Magazine in Praise of Chimney Sweepers, White had already been dead two years. The notice of his death is duly recorded in the issue of The Gentleman's Magazine, May, 1820, as follows : " March 13. At his house in Burton Crescent, Mr. James White, Agent of Provincial Newspapers. He was justly endeared to his friends by the qualities of his heart and endearments of his mind. He was the author of an ingenious little work, called " Fal- stafPs Letters,' published soon after the detection of Ireland's celebrated Shakespearian forgery." Charles Lamb and the Falstaff Letters. " He (i.e. Jem White) and Lamb were joint authors of the Original Letters of Falstaff " ; so wrote Southey to Edward Moxon in 1836, and there can be little doubt that White was not only indebted to Lamb for his first introduction to Shakespeare's Henry IV ', but owed to him more than one hint in the composition of the Letters. The Dedication and Preface (more especially the imprecation on the rump of roast pig) are suggestive of the hand of Elia. Most students of Lamb are inclined to assign these passages to his pen. " Be that as it may," writes the last of Lamb's scholarly editors, Mr. E. V. Lucas, " it is probably true that White's zest in the making of this book helped towards Lamb's Elizabethan- izing." l Lamb's enthusiasm for the Letters may be noted in his own Letters, and in his efforts to win recognition for the book. In his letters to Coleridge in 1796 we find two interesting references : " White is on the eve of publishing (he took the hint from Vortigern ^ Original Letters of- Falstaff, Shallow, etc., a copy you shall have when it comes out. They are without exception the best imitations I ever saw." " White's Letters are near publication ; could you review 'em, or get 'em reviewed ? Are you not con- nected with the Critical Review ? His frontispiece is a good conceit Sir John learning to dance to please Madam Page, in dress of doublet, etc., from the upper half, and modern pantaloons, with shoes, etc., of the eighteenth century, from the lower half ; and the whole work is full of goodly quips and rare fancies, * all deftly masqued like hoar antiquity ' much 1 Cf. the Works of Charles Lamb, ed. E. V. Lucas, vol. >> P- 467- 2 ;'. e. Ireland's pseudo-Shakespearian play. xiii superior to Dr. Kenrick's ' Falstaff's Wedding,' l which you have seen." Accordingly the following notice appeared in the Critical Review for June 1797 : " The humorous characters of Shakespeare have seldom been successfully imitated. Dr. Kenrick wrote a play called Falstaff's Wedding, in which he introduced the merry knight and his companions ; but the peculiar quaintness of the character was lost by being sunk in modern wit. The author of the little work before us has, we think, been somewhat more successful, and must have given his days and nights to the study of the language of Falstaff, Dame Quickly, Slender, etc. His object, indeed, seems to be, to ridicule the late gross imposture of Norfolk Street ; and certain it is, that, had these letters been introduced into the world, prepared in the manner of the Ireland MSS., the internal evidence would have spoken more loudly in their favour. But in whatever esteem they may be held as imitations, they argue no small portion of humour in the writer, who, we understand, is a young man, and this his first 1 FalstafFs Wedding ; a comedy ; being a sequel to the second part of the play of King Henry the 4th, by W. Kenrick, London, 1760 (Preface dated 1766). attempt. Our extract shall be confined to the Dedication." A similar notice appeared in the November issue of the Monthly Review. " I hope by this time," Lamb writes to his friend Manning, " you are prepared to say the Falstaff Letters are a bundle of the sharpest, queerest, pro- foundest humours of any these juice-drained latter times have spawned. I should have advertised you that the meaning is frequently hard to be got at ; and so are the future guineas that now lie ripening and aurifying in the womb of some undiscovered Potosi ; but dig, dig, dig, dig, Manning ! " Talfourd, in his " Letters of Charles Lamb, with a Sketch of his Life " (London, 1837), notes tnat " tne work was neglected, although Lamb exerted all the influence he subsequently acquired with more popular writers to obtain for it favourable notices, as will be seen from various passages in his letters. He stuck, however, gallantly by his favourite protege ; and even when he could little afford to disburse sixpence, he made a point of buying a copy of the book whenever he discovered one amidst the refuse of a bookseller's stall, and would present it to a friend in the hope of making a convert. He gave me one of these copies soon after I became acquainted with him, stating that he had purchased it in the morning for sixpence, and assuring me I should enjoy a rare treat in the perusal." l Lamb's Notice in "The Examiner." Happily, before his death, Jem White had proof of his friend's unabated enthusiasm for the work ; above the four asterisks, indicative of his contributions, Lamb made another final effort to revive interest in the Letters by a laudatory notice appearing in The Examiner for September 5, 1819 : " A copy of this work sold at the Roxburgh sale for five guineas. We have both before and since that time picked it up at stalls for eighteenpence. Reader, if you shall ever light upon a copy in the same way, we counsel you to buy it. We are deceived if there be not in it much of the true Shakespearian stuff. We present you with a few of the Letters, which may speak for themselves." ****** 1 Cf. vol. i. pp. 12, 13. 3 Reprinted by Leigh Hunt, in The Indicator, Jan. 24, 1821. In his introductory remarks Leigh Hunt pays an affectionate tribute to White. " Not the least, indeed, of his Shakespearian qualities was an indifference to fame. He was also, like his great inspirer, a gentleman." He adds a reference to their boy- hood at school : " We remember, as he passed through the cloisters, how we used to admire his handsome appearance, and unimprovable manner of wearing his new clothes." xvi " How say you, reader, do not these inventions smack of Eastcheap ? Are they not nimble, forgetive, evasive ? Is not the humour of them elaborate, cogitabund, farciful ? Carry they not the true image and superscriptions of the father which begat them ? Are they not steeped all over in character subtle, pro- found, unctuous ? Is not here the very effigies of the Knight ? Could a counterfeit Jack Falstaff come by these conceits ? Or are you, reader, one who delights to drench his mirth in tears ? You are, or, peradventure, have been, a lover ; a ' dismissed bachelor,' perchance, one that is ' lass-lorn.' Come, then, and weep over the dying bed of such a one as thyself, weep with us the death of poor Abraham Slender" " Should these specimens fail to rouse your curiosity to see the whole, it may be to your loss, gentle reader, but it will give small pain to the spirit of him that wrote this little book ; my fine-tempered friend, J. W. for not in authorship, or the spirit of authorship, but from the fullness of a young soul, newly kindling at the Shakespearian flame, and bursting to be delivered of a rich exuberance of conceits, I had almost said kindred with those of the full Shakespearian genius itself, were these letters dictated. We remember when the inspiration came upon him ; when the plays of Henry the Fourth were first put into his hands. We think at our recommendation he read them, rather late in life, though still he was but a youth. He may have forgotten, but we cannot, the pleasant evenings which ensued at the Boar's Head (as we called our tavern, though in reality the sign was not that, nor the street Eastcheap, for that honoured place of resort has long since passed away) when over our pottle of Sherris he would talk you nothing but pure Falstaff the long evenings through. Like his, the wit of J. W. was deep, recondite, imaginative, full of goodly figures and fancies. Those evenings have long since passed away, and nothing comparable to them has come in their stead, or can come. We have heard the chimes at midnight." xviii PAGE Dedication xxiii Preface xxix I Falstaff to Prince Henry 3 II Falstaff to the Prince 5 III Falstaff to the Prince 10 IV The Bishop of Worcester to his Highness of Wales 13 V The Prince to Falstaff 16 VI Falstaff to the Prince 18 VII Justice Shallow to Davy 21 VIII To the Right Honourable the Lord Shallow Davy to Ditto 24 IX Antient Pistol to Sir John 27 X Falstaff to Antient Pistol 29 XI Corporal Nym to Sir John 31 XII Falstaff to Antient Pistol 32 XIII Antient Pistol to Sir John 35 XIV Deposition taken before Master Robert Shal- low, and Master Slender at Windsor . . 36 XV Antient Pistol and Corporal Nym to Sir John 42 XVI Mrs. Ford to Sir John Falstaff 43 XVII Sir John Falstaff to Mrs. Ford 45 XVIII Falstaff to Brook 47 xix FACE XIX Falstaff to Brook 49 XX Mistress Quickly to Sir John Falstaff . . 51 XXI Mistress Quickly to Sir John Falstaff . . 54 XXII Sir John Falstaff to Mistress Ursula . . . 56 XXIII Master Slender to Ann Page 58 XXIV Sir Hugh Evans to Ann Page 62 XXV Ancient Pistol to Master Abram Slender . 65 XXVI Combination of the Windsor Innkeepers . 66 XXVII Sir John to Antient Pistol 68 XXVIII Sir John to Corporal Bardolph 71 XXIX Sir Hugh Evans of the goot town Windsor, Priest, to Sir John Falstaff, greeting . . 75 XXX Sir John to Corporal Bardolph 79 XXXI Antient Pistol to Sir John Falstaff. ... 83 XXXII Davy to Shallow 86 XXXIII Shallow to Davy 90 XXXIV Davy to Shallow 93 XXXV Captain Fluellin to Mrs. Quickly . ... 97 Notes 103 Index 109 Original Hetters, &c. OF SIR JOHN FALSTAFF AND HIS FRIENDS; NOW FIRST MADE PUBLIC BY A GENTLEMAN, A DESCENDANT OF DAME QUICKLY, FROM GENUINE MANUSCRIPTS WHICH HAVE BEEN IN THE POSSESSION OF THE QUICKLY FAMILY NEAR FOUR HUNDRED YEARS. LONDON : 1796 Jtlaster (Samuel Irtlaunbe. Curtis anfr ^rubitc |tin0fa)Cn: unto gon it i0 tohatte maner of menu* there be in thg0 age, toho fceeme theg hot mankpnlie m0chel 0erbj>, tohan in thegre Unb 0orte tlteg make mocke at treto sc^tnct, tohgch C0nsi0tetlt for the mxr0t parte, it 0holbe 0eeme, in the notice0 toe habc idtt us at antiquitie. '(Ehere be menne, toh0 thinke sconu of pagn0- takeinQ OHight0 (like you 0r me) toho frxmt the mgne0 xrf remote tyme bj) bjjnte of togle bo brjmge forthe to bieto the ptetiou0 golbe anb the 0ylbere, tohere-in it mag not be farce from om bi0cottr0e to remarke after tohatte fa0hgone the mgne0 I here bi0cu00e bo* biffer from mgne0 phg0ic or natural. In a0 moche a0 the0e latter boe renberre uppe thegre trea0ure0 gettt being rube, anb (as menne romonlg 0aicn) in the oarre ; tohereas those mgnes intellectual, abounben in a sorte of metal, tohgche cometh forthe on- mgngleb togthe baser matter, anb beargnge en- graben onne it the marke anb impresse, tohgche t0 mettne skgtfttl in soche thguges, ani ranbtbe, bothe notiffe ani assure its authentidtie. ^er- abbentnre, neebe is I sholbe here fetthe instaunce from thatte treh) mgne anb rgche bein of poesge btujge out in these last bags bg that gotxnge Jpristotogan, anb tohgche to all sounb mgnbes bib ebibenre a genuine bgrthe. (^ho' there be, toho stgcke notte to affgrme that the antio^ie ^Botoleg teas noe ober thanne the strgplinge Chatterton, therein erring.) ^ote thps is a magne bigressgone from the matter in honbe, tho' therein 3E stanbe noite almie, habing notable exemplar in thatte famose SSight of Jlntiquitie, the Ratine poet 'Bergilius (as ^an Chaucer 'clepeth him argghte, tohom the mintgnge month of after tgmes mgs-nameth Virgil). <^lsoe if neebe toere, 5 might here rite the exemplar of thatte grete (Elerke himself e, of tohom his pttpil