LB 
 
 UC-NRLF 
 
 o 
 o 
 
 L 
 
^'2^-^:'^-T--^:^^m^ 
 
 I 
 
 GIFT OF 
 

 THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION 
 
 FOR THE ADVANCEMENT 
 
 OF TEACHING 
 
 FOUNDED 1905 
 
 Mgitized by the I ht§rriet Archive 
 
 in 2007 with funding from 
 — IVIicrosoft Corporation 
 
 ^^^- - ' ^^ R ST T V 
 
 REPRINTED FROM A HANDBOOK OF THE PUBLIC 
 BENEFACTIONS OF ANDREW CARNEGIE 
 
 1919 
 
 http://www.archive.org/details/carnegiefoundatiOOconcrich 
 
THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION 
 
 FOR THE ADVANCEMENT 
 
 OF TEACHING 
 
 FOUNDED 1905 
 
 REPRINTED FROM A HANDBOOK OF THE PUBLIC 
 BENEFACTIONS OF ANDREW CARNEGIE 
 
 1919 
 

 THE RUMFORD PRESS 
 CONCORD, N. H. 
 
 i^ 
 
THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE 
 ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 
 
 Founded 1905 
 
 The six institutions described in the first section of this Manual 
 were founded in years so recent that their beginnings are today- 
 fresh in the memory of those fortunate enough to have been 
 associated in their inception and development. To them the 
 personality of the founder, his belief in human progress, his opti- 
 mism for the future, his sincere desire to do the best with the great 
 fortune genius had brought together, were part and parcel of these 
 early associations. 
 
 Before the memories of these days grow dim, while the founder 
 is with us, still full of faith for the future, notwithstanding the 
 confusion and the pain that have fallen upon the world, it seems 
 fitting to set down in the pages of this handbook an account of 
 these beginnings, to tell briefly the story of how these enter- 
 prises were launched, what were the visions that set them afloat 
 on the stream of time, and to render some account of the short 
 voyage they have made in common. The statement which 
 follows is the story of the first twelve years of the Carnegie 
 Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, the fourth in time 
 of Mr. Carnegie's spiritual children, born in 1905, and christened 
 by an Act of Congress in the spring of 1906. 
 
 For a special reason the present moment is fitting for an account 
 of the Carnegie Foundation, told not entirely in statistics but in 
 terms of human experience. 
 
 When the Carnegie Foundation was begun neither the founder 
 nor the Trustees conceived of the teacher's pension except in 
 terms of a free gift to a man grown old in a life of unselfish service. 
 While the Act of Incorporation and the Rules adopted by the 
 Trustees reserved to them full power to change their policy and 
 plans, this conception of the teacher's pension seemed at that 
 time the basis of a permanent policy. 
 
>■ » » « p 
 
 2 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 Quid non longa valehit permutare dies? or as Mr. Carnegie pre- 
 ferred to quote from one of his own poets — "Nae man can tether 
 time or tide." Time has moved swiftly with the Carnegie 
 Foundation, and the lapse of twelve years finds it working for 
 the same objects for which it was founded but through plans 
 greatly modified by experience and study. 
 
 In no respect did Mr. Carnegie show greater foresight than in 
 emphasizing, as usual, in his letter of gift the freedom left to his 
 Trustees to modify, or, under certain circumstances, tochangecom- 
 pletely the methods of applying the great endowments entrusted 
 to them. To the Trustees of the Carnegie Foundation was com- 
 mitted the problem of teachers' pensions. The pension problem, 
 not alone for teachers but for all groups in the body poUtic, 
 became within a few years thereafter a social and economic ques- 
 tion of the highest importance. The Trustees of the Foundation 
 were led after years of study to a conception of a pension system 
 widely different from that with which they started. As honest 
 and ponscientious Trustees, they have sought to face resolutely 
 the difficulties of the transformation they conceived to be neces- 
 sary. 
 
 In this process the founder has himself taken the keenest 
 interest. It is a source of the deepest satisfaction that he has 
 lived to approve step by step the process under which the original 
 plan of administration of the Carnegie Foundation has been 
 modified, in the light of experience and study. In his judgment 
 these changes are changes in method only, whose only object is 
 to serve in a deeper and larger way the great purpose for which 
 the Foundation came into being. 
 
 I 
 
 ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 
 
 The Carnegie Foundation was the outcome of Mr. Carnegie's 
 sympathy with the cause of education, and of his desire to be of 
 service to the teachers of America. In a letter of April 16, 1905, 
 announcing a gift for this cause, he wrote ''I have reached the 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 6 
 
 conclusion that the least rewarded of all the professions is that 
 of the teacher in our higher educational institutions. . . . 
 Able men hesitate to accept teaching as a career, and many old 
 professors whose places should be occupied by younger men can 
 not be retired. ... I have, therefore, transferred to you 
 and your successors, as Trustees, $10,000,000 five per cent first 
 mortgage bonds of the United States Steel Corporation, the rev- 
 enue from which is to provide retiring pensions for the teachers 
 of universities, colleges and technical schools in our country, 
 Canada and Newfoundland, under such conditions as you may 
 adopt from time to time." This letter was addressed to twenty- 
 five men including in their number many of the best known 
 presidents of colleges and universities in the United States, such 
 as President Eliot of Harvard, President Harper of Chicago, and 
 President Wilson of Princeton. A list of this first group of Trust- 
 ees is given in the appendix of this paper. 
 
 The first Executive Committee was composed of the following 
 Trustees: Henry S. Pritchett, ex officio, Nicholas Murray Butler, 
 Robert A. Franks, Charles C. Harrison, Alexander C. Humphreys, 
 Frank A. Vanderlip, Woodrow Wilson. 
 
 The Executive Committee, by the direction of the Board, 
 obtained from the Congress of the United States an act of in- 
 corporation. 
 
 This act enabled the corporation to receive and maintain funds 
 for paying pensions to college teachers in the United States, 
 Canada and Newfoundland, and ''in general to do and perform 
 all things necessary to encourage, uphold and dignify the pro- 
 fession of the teacher and the cause of higher education" in 
 these three countries. The act is printed in full in the appendix. 
 
 Of the original members of the Board fifteen still remain in 
 service. President William R. Harper died before taking his 
 seat. Other members have resigned as they have given up their 
 university places. 
 
 The by-laws of the Board of Trustees provide for the election 
 each year of a chairman of the Board, who has duties independent 
 of the President, including the presiding over meetings, the ap- 
 
4 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 pointment of committees, and the designation each year of an in- 
 dependent auditor to examine the books and accounts of the 
 Foundation. The following Trustees have served as chairman 
 of the Board: President Charles W. Eliot, from 1905 to 1909; 
 Provost Charles C. Harrison, from 1909 to 1910; Principal Wil- 
 Uam Peterson, from 1910 to 1914; President William Frederick 
 Slocum, from 1914 to 1917; President Arthur Twining Hadley, 
 since 1917. 
 
 The administrative officers of the Board are: Henry S. Prit- 
 chett. President; Robert A. Franks, Treasurer; Clyde Furst, 
 Secretary. 
 
 These officers are appointed by and hold office at the pleasure 
 of the Board. 
 
 The annual meeting of the Board of Trustees is held on the 
 third Wednesday in November, a date which falls near the birth- 
 day anniversary of Mr. Carnegie. It has been the custom at the 
 annual gatherings for Mr. Carnegie to meet the Board at a luncheon 
 held between the morning and afternoon sessions at which, with- 
 out taking part in the business meeting, he has been able to ex- 
 press his conception of the scope and development of the work 
 of the Foundation. These conferences, particularly those of the 
 earlier years, will long be remembered by the Trustees as gather- 
 ings from which they came away full of the hope and the faith of 
 which the founder was so triumphant a representative. 
 
 When the Board had obtained a charter and was duly organized 
 for its work, the first task to be met was the formulation of defi- 
 nite rules for the granting of retiring allowances. 
 
 it was clear that the granting of such allowances upon petition 
 and fortuitously could serve no permanent purpose. Retiring; 
 allowances to be of value must come in accordance with rules 
 under which a teacher would be entitled to anticipate such an 
 allowance under stated conditions. Furthermore, it was clear 
 that the funds at the disposition of the Trustees could provide 
 retiring allowances for a limited number of teachers only. The 
 Trustees therefore admitted to the privileges of the retiring allow- 
 ances certain institutions, whose work was clearly of true college 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 0« 
 
 or university quality, and fixed rules for retirement under which 
 the teachers in these institutions might expect retiring allowances. 
 These are known as associated institutions. 
 
 The rules adopted for conferring retiring allowances were 
 based upon length of service and upon age. Twenty-five years 
 of service as a professor was the minimum basis of the service 
 pension and sixty-five years the minimum limit of age at which 
 retirement could be asked. 
 
 In making and announcing these rules, the Trustees of the 
 Foundation took pains not to bind themselves to any contractual 
 arrangement or to promises they might be unable to fulfil. In 
 connection with the announcement of the rules, and as part of the 
 same memorandum, they reserved the right to make such changes 
 as experience might indicate as desirable for the benefit of the 
 whole body of teachers. This right was soon exercised, in 1908, 
 by the extension of the privileges of the Foundation to widows of 
 teachers and to instructors as well as to professors, and in 1909 
 by the elimination of the pension granted on the basis of service 
 alone. 
 
 Notwithstanding the need to grant retiring allowances accord- 
 ing to rule, rather than in response to requests and recommenda- 
 tions, the Trustees realized that it was Mr. Carnegie's wish to 
 serve the old and faithful teachers of this generation, to as great an 
 extent as possible. The Trustees have therefore always devoted a- 
 considerable proportion of the income of the Endowment to the 
 payment of retiring allowances to individual teachers, in institu- 
 tions not associated with the Foundation, but who had grown old 
 in teaching, and who had rendered long and distinguished service 
 in their respective States. The income of the Foundation has 
 never been pledged for the indefinite future to a group of teachers. 
 
 Immediately upon the announcement of the rules of retirement, 
 the Trustees were called upon to decide a difficult question of 
 general poUcy. Mr. Carnegie, in the language of his letter of 
 gift, did not ''presume to include" institutions controlled and 
 supported by the States. The representatives of the tax-sup- 
 ported institutions made vigorous application to be included iA 
 
6 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 the list of institutions sharing in the pension privileges. The 
 inclusion of State institutions was urged mainly upon three 
 grounds — that these institutions were nonsectarian and therefore 
 belonged to the class of colleges in which Mr. Carnegie was most 
 interested; that to omit them from the pension privileges of the 
 Foundation would divide American institutions of learning into 
 two contrasted groups, and in the third place it was argued that 
 the States of the Union and the provinces of Canada would never 
 pay pensions to teachers, and therefore aid from private sources 
 was essential if pensions were ever to be obtained by the teachers 
 in tax-supported institutions. 
 
 By direction of the Trustees the matter was made the subject 
 of a special report by the President. This report presented the 
 arguments for and against the establishment of a pension system 
 in State institutions by private endowment, and urged in con- 
 clusion that the best interests of the teachers in State institutions 
 would be conserved by obtaining pension privileges through the 
 State governments, even though it might require time to educate 
 the pubUc to this notion. 
 
 Mr. Carnegie in March 1908, offered five millions of dollars 
 ■additional endowment to enable the Trustees to enlarge the num- 
 ber of institutions *' should the governing boards of any State uni- 
 -versities apply for participation in the fund and the legislature 
 and governor of the State approve such appU cation." He di- 
 rected that the two funds thus provided be considered a single 
 endowment. In accordance with these conditions, application 
 has been made on behalf of all of our State universities for a share 
 in the pensions provided by this endowment, and these appUca- 
 tions have been approved by the legislatures and governors of the 
 respective States. Similar action has been taken in the provinces 
 of Canada. 
 
 It is interesting to note that although little more than ten years 
 have elapsed since this discussion, pensions for teachers are al- 
 ready being paid in whole or in part by the following State or 
 Provincial Governments: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecti- 
 cut, IlUnois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minne- 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 7 
 
 seta, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North 
 Dakota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West 
 Virginia, and Wisconsin, and in the Canadian provinces of Ontario 
 and Saskatchewan. 
 
 Seventy-three institutions of higher learning have been ad- 
 mitted to the list of associated institutions. Of these, sixty- 
 three are endowed colleges controlled by boards of trustees, 
 while ten are tax-supported institutions controlled by State, 
 provincial, or municipal governments. 
 
 Of the seventy-three associated institutions seventy are in the 
 United States and three in Canada. There are in the United 
 States approximately one thousand institutions granting college 
 degrees. In the Dominion of Canada, where the degree-granting 
 power has been much more carefully guarded, there are some 
 seventy institutions bearing the name college or university. The 
 institutions whose professors participate in the privileges of the 
 pension system of the Foundation include, therefore, only about 
 seven per cent of the degree-granting institutions of the United 
 States and Canada, but as these institutions include some of the 
 largest endowed and tax-supported universities their teachers 
 constitute a much larger percentage of the total number of coUege 
 teachers in the two countries. A list of the associated colleges 
 and universities is given in the appendix. 
 
 The Carnegie Institute of Technology also enjoys the privi- 
 leges of an associated institution, thus bringing the total to 
 seventy-four. 
 
 In these seventy-four colleges, universities and technical schools 
 there were, as of date April 1, 1917, 6,593 teachers including 
 professors, associate or assistant professors, and instructors. Of 
 these 715 were women. 
 
 The cost of the retiring allowances for these teachers and of 
 pensions for widows of teachers amounted for the year ending 
 June 30, 1918, to $680,855.71. For the thifteen years of its 
 existence ending November 20, 1918, the Foundation has granted 
 469 retiring allowances and 151 widows' pensions in the associated 
 institutions at a cost of $4,910,967.17 and 135 allowances and 43 
 
8 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 widows' pensions in87 other institutions at a cost of $1,349,532.99. 
 The total expenditure for the entire 798 allowances and pensions 
 amounted therefore at the date mentioned to $6,260,500.16. 
 These payments were made, in the main, to men and women 
 grown old in a profession in which there had been scant oppor- 
 tunity to provide against dependence in old age. How much of 
 human anxiety the expenditure of this money has relieved, no 
 one can tell. To have rendered this service has been to the 
 founder of this institution one of the greatest satisfactions amid 
 the gradually lengthening shadows of advancing age. To him 
 the occasional letter of appreciation from an old teacher, or from 
 a teacher's widow, has meant a true benediction. 
 
 The administration of the Trust so far as Newfoundland is con- 
 cerned has presented difficulties. When it became necessary, in 
 the judgment of the Trustees, to pay retiring allowances through 
 institutions of college grade, articulating with a secondary school 
 system, the educational system in Newfoundland was so unlike 
 those in the United States and Canada, that it has been found 
 necessary to grant such retiring allowances as were paid to teachers 
 in Newfoundland to individuals, upon the recommendation of the 
 Newfoundland authorities. 
 
 The transformation of the retiring allowance system into a con- 
 tributory form, as described hereafter, will offer to teachers in 
 higher education in Newfoundland, and in particular to those 
 hereafter entering the profession, exactly the same opportunities 
 as to those in the United States and Canada. 
 
 Among the distinguished scholars and teachers who have re- 
 ceived retiring allowances at the hands of the Trustees of the 
 Foundation have been the following: Professors William James, 
 Palmer, Peabody, and Toy of Harvard, Beers, Sumner, Ladd, and 
 Woolsey of Yale, Corson and De Garmo of Cornell, Burgess and 
 Chandler of Columbia, Ormond of Princeton, March of Lafayette 
 and Gildersleeve of Johns Hopkins; Deans Wright of Yale, Van 
 Amringe of Columbia, Stoddard of New York University , and Snow 
 <ind Woodward of Washington University; Edgar Gardner Mur- 
 phy, secretary of the Southern Education Board; Presidents 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 9 
 
 Eliot of Harvard, Patton of Princeton, Remsen of Johns Hopkins, 
 Seelye of Smith, and Taylor of Vassar, Gordon of Queen's Univer- 
 sity, Northrup of Minnesota, Jesse of Missouri, Jordan of Leland 
 Stanford; WiUiam Pilot, president of the Council of Education of 
 Newfoundland; and William T. Harris, United States Commis- 
 sioner of Education. 
 
 II 
 
 STUDIES IN EDUCATION 
 
 In the charter of the Foundation, provision is made for engag- 
 ing in any endeavor within the field of education that tends to 
 promote and advance the profession of the teacher. It has always 
 been recognized by the Trustees that the study and report upon 
 educational problems is one of the fruitful fields of endeavor upon 
 which such an endowed agency could enter. For this work, the 
 detachment of the Foundation from local interests and institution- 
 al plans presents a certain advantage. It goes without saying that 
 those in charge of such an organization can assume to possess no 
 wisdom superior to that of college teachers, or of university 
 presidents, or of officials of State systems of education. They 
 may, however, by reason of the very detachment of such an 
 endowment, be able to approach such questions free, to some 
 extent at least, of local interest or of institutional parallax. If 
 the studies of the Foundation have resulted in a real service to 
 education, the result is due, in part at least, to this fact. 
 
 Recognizing the value of such work, Mr. Carnegie, as president 
 of the Carnegie Corporation, addressed a letter on January 31, 
 1913, to the Trustees of the Foundation in which he offered 
 $1,250,000 of four per cent bonds as an endowment for a Division 
 of Edui^ation al Enq uiry. The Trustees accepted this gift as a 
 separate trust, and the fifty thousand dollars of annual income 
 has been devoted to the work of educational enquiry. In making 
 such studies, the effort has been made to avoid the formation of a 
 bureau having a fixed organization and a crystalUzed educational 
 program. The principal studies have been made by men selected 
 
10 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 for their special qualifications, who have come temporarily to 
 the service of the Foundation, giving their whole time and thought 
 to the study during the period of their stay, and at the com- 
 pletion of the study, returning to their former places. Universi- 
 ties and colleges have cooperated most cordially with the Founda- 
 tion by lending their professors for periods of one, two, or three 
 years for such studies. Among those who have temporarily 
 served the Foundation in its various studies are Abraham Flexner, 
 now secretary of the General Education Board ; Morris Llewellyn 
 Cooke, now of the War Industries Board; Professor Josef Red- 
 lich of the University of Vienna; Charles Riborg Mann, now 
 adviser to the War Department Committee on Education ; Deans 
 Pound, Stone, Hall, Bates, James, and McGovney, and Professor 
 Costigan of the law schools of Harvard, Columbia, Chicago, 
 Michigan, Missouri, Iowa, and Northwestern; among professors- 
 of education: Thorndike and Strayer of Columbia, Dearborn of 
 Harvard, McMurry of George Peabody College, Bagley of 
 Illinois, Josselyn of Kansas, and Elliott of Montana; and Com-^ 
 missioner Hillegas of Vermont. Technical advice has been se- 
 cured from a large number of others. 
 
 In the prosecution of educational studies, the Foundation has 
 offered to those who thus cooperated with it the largest measure 
 of freedom, both in their methods and in their utterances. The 
 discussions and papers relating to educational enquiries have been 
 printed in part in the annual reports of the President, and in part 
 in special publications known as bulletins. These discussions, 
 and reports have covered a wide range of topics, such as miUtary, 
 civil, clerical, industrial, and teachers' pension systems; State, 
 provincial, and denominational support and control of higher edu- 
 cation and financial reporting; college advertising and catalogues; 
 college entrance requirements and their administration; the ap~ 
 pointment, salaries, tenure, and retirement privileges of college 
 teachers; the reporting of college finances; the present state of 
 agricultural, engineering, legal, and medical education and the 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 11 
 
 training of teachers; academic standards in general; education 
 and politics; State educational reports; the legislative history of 
 federal aid to education, and European views of American educa- 
 tion. The Foundation has just issued bulletins concerning En- 
 gineering Education and Pensions for Public School Teachers. 
 Studies of the training of teachers and of legal aid societies are 
 nearly ready. Steady progress is being made on a comprehensive 
 study of legal education. 
 
 In the prosecution of these studies the Foundation has had an 
 enlightening experience, not only as to the difficulty of obtaining 
 men fitted for the discriminating and laborious study of educa- 
 tional enquiry, but also as to the expenditure of time and money 
 necessary to obtain the information upon which alone a just and 
 useful report could be based. 
 
 The re port o n medical education in the United States and in 
 Europe, contained in two bulletins, occupied four years in prep- 
 aration and cost, including publication, approximately forty 
 thousand dollars. 
 
 The re^port on the educational system of Vermont occupied 
 two years in preparation, and cost in its preparation and publica- 
 tion twenty thousand dollars. 
 
 The study of the training of teachers, part of which is now in 
 presS; has engaged first and last the services of seventy-five per- 
 sons, and deals comprehensively with the training institutions 
 and the twenty thousand teachers of a great State. It has oc- 
 cupied more than four years and has cost seventy-five thousand 
 dollars. 
 
 The report on legal education begun in 1913 is not yet complete. 
 One bulletin has already appeared dealing with the Case System 
 of instruction in law schools. A second bulletin, entitled ''Justice 
 and the Poor," is now in press. The study has involved not 
 only the examination of every law school in the country but the 
 study of the system of admission to the bar in forty-eight States. 
 At times as many as fifty people have been occupied simultane- 
 ously in this study. The mass of material brought together is 
 
12 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 enormous, but it has gradually been digested to the point where 
 its evidence can be made clear, not only to the trained lawyer, 
 but to the intelligent layman interested in the administration of 
 justice. 
 
 In a country so large as ours where conditions are so varied 
 and the number of men and of organizations to be considered in 
 any educational enquiry is so great, the mere gathering of the in- 
 formation necessary to come to a fair knowledge of the truth is a 
 costly and laborious undertaking. 
 
 Whenever the Foundation has undertaken a study of this char- 
 acter, it has adopted the principle that a thorough and painstaking 
 study, based upon full evidence and fairly and honestly inter- 
 preted, is worth more than any number of superficial and partial 
 reports. Having begun such an enquiry, it has 'spared neither 
 expense nor time to procure the information deemed necessary 
 by those having the study in charge, and it has steadily declined 
 to publish a report until the subject has been, to the best of our 
 knowledge and ability, worked out. Having reached that point, 
 the Foundation has endeavored to print its reports in as clear and 
 simple a form as possible. One must under such conditions 
 sometimes be disappointed by unexpected delays. Time is itself 
 a factor in the value of a report or of an educational study. 
 Nevertheless, the dangers from delays due to such causes are not 
 to be compared to those that arise from hasty investigations. 
 
 A list of the publications of the Foundation, including the an- 
 nual reports and the bulletins devoted to special enquiries, is given 
 at the end of this paper. There is a cumulative index to the first 
 ten reports. 
 
 Ill 
 
 THE REORGANIZATION OF THE PENSION SYSTEM 
 
 When the Carnegie Foundation was incorporated in the spring 
 of 1906, there was no conception of a pension plan in the minds of 
 Mr. Carnegie and of his Trustees, except that of the free payment 
 of pensions to as many teachers as the income of the endowment 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 13 
 
 would provide. In making such payments, the Trustees had 
 clearly recognized that such pensions or allowances must be sti- 
 pendiary in character, that is to say, they must have some fair 
 relation to the active salary. In general, the rules aimed to pro- 
 vide an old age pension equal to approximately sixty per cent of 
 the active pay during the last five years of service. The rules 
 were so framed that this proportion was about sixty per cent f®r 
 the average pay of the full professor; being larger than sixty per 
 cent for smaller salaries and less than sixty per cent for larger 
 ones. Thus a man retiring at sixty-five on a salary of $1200 re- 
 ceived a retiring allowance of SI 000; one retiring on a $3000 salary 
 a $1900 allowance, while one retiring on a $6000 salary received an 
 allowance of $3400. The maximum allowance granted was $4000. 
 
 The Trustees likewise adopted as a general policy the confer- 
 ring of retiring allowances through designated colleges and uni- 
 versities. No other plan was possible if the teacher was to re- 
 ceive his allowance under definite rules, while at the same time 
 the number of teachers to whom pensions could be given was 
 necessarily limited. The system of retiring allowances set up by 
 the Trustees in accordance with the general desire of the founder, 
 was, therefore, a non contributory pension, established in a 
 limited number of colleges and universities, under rules fixed by 
 the Trustees, and subject to modification as time and experience 
 might indicate. 
 
 Within a very short time the defects of this plan began to show 
 themselves. The establishment of a privilege so valuable as a 
 free pension, when restricted to a limited number of institutions, 
 involved discriminations between institutions which as time passed 
 became more and more difficult to justify. 
 
 The working of the rules themselves began to show results not 
 anticipated. Mr, Carnegie had in mind the offer of a pension to 
 the teacher grown old in the service. To the old teacher, such 
 a privilege coming unexpectedly at the end of long and faithful 
 work was a gracious and friendly service. The situation was 
 entirely different when the promise of a pension was held before 
 the eyes of the man who was twenty, thirty, or forty years away 
 
14 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 from retirement. Within a few years, both Mr. Carnegie and the 
 Trustees began to have serious doubts of the wisdom of any sys- 
 tem of pensions provided entirely without the cooperation of the 
 beneficiary, whether he were a teacher, a government employe, or 
 an industrial worker. 
 
 There was only one thing that right-minded and courageous 
 men could do under such circumstances, and that was to make 
 a thorough study of the whole subject and, after full knowledge, 
 to go forward to ^ constructive and permanent solution of the 
 problem of teachers^ pensions. 
 
 As a preliminary, the literature of the world bearing on such 
 questions was brought together and discussed. The reports of 
 the Foundation and the material gathered at its office contain 
 probably the most complete statement of pension literature in ex- 
 istence. In addition, the Trustees of the Foundation sought the 
 advice and aid of expert actuaries, statisticians, and economists. 
 
 The pension problem has become in the last twelve years a 
 social and economic question of the first importance, and the 
 Trustees soon realized that the right solution of their problem 
 was one of far-reaching effect. They endeavored, therefore, to 
 deal not only with the details of teachers' pensions, but to deter- 
 mine the fundamental principles that must underlie a pension 
 system designed for any group in the body politic. 
 
 This study extended over a series of years. The steps by which 
 the various conclusions were reached are given in detail in the 
 reports and bulletins of the Foundation. They can be best ex- 
 amined in these publications. 
 
 The conclusions to which the Trustees were led were so impor- 
 tant, that these should be briefly stated in any account of the 
 first twelve years of the Foundation's history. 
 
 The facts clearly estabUshed by these investigations were the 
 following: 
 
 A pension system paid out of income, whether of a government 
 or of a corporation, at no cost to the beneficiary is expensive be- 
 yond all anticipation. Its cost is not only impossible to estimate 
 in advance, but has proved an intolerable burden even to the 
 practically unlimited income of a government. 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 15 
 
 Experience shows further that while under the noncontrib- 
 utory plan the beneficiary appears to get something for nothing, 
 it is certain that in a limited number of years the pension will be 
 absorbed in the wage or salary schedule, and become practically 
 deferred pay, received by only a minority of those interested. 
 
 The effect of the so-called free pension upon the individual is 
 distinctly demoralizing. The notion of getting something for 
 nothing appeals to our universal human nature, but it is a prolific 
 breeder of human selfishness. Not only is this true, but the 
 Ufting from the shoulders of the individual of a responsibihty 
 properly and rightfully his is a source of weakness, not of strength. 
 What society needs is the machinery under which the individual 
 shall be able to discharge his obHgation, without making an 
 unreasonable demand either upon his financial resources or upon 
 his self-control. 
 
 The evidence brought together convinced the Trustees that a 
 noncontributory pension system, such as they had inaugurated, 
 was not in the permanent interest of the college teacher, and that 
 it should be transformed into a system in which the expense could 
 be definitely estimated in advance, in which the teacher should 
 have the security of an individual contract, and in which the 
 teacher and his employer, the college, should cooperate in estab- 
 lishing, maintaining, and governing the organization through 
 which the contracts for retiring allowances were to be made and 
 carried out. It is a source of great satisfaction that the founder 
 himself approved these conclusions heartily and completely. 
 
 When the Trustees had come thus far, their task was only be- 
 gun. It is one thing to point out the defects of a piece of social 
 mechanism; it is quite another to construct in its place one that 
 will serve. In this constructive effort the Trustees sought to avail 
 themselves of every possible aid from experts in America and 
 Europe, and they endeavored also to consult all those directly 
 interested in the outcome, desiring not only to obtain the benefit 
 of constructive suggestion, but also to meet as far as possible the 
 points of view of the teachers themselves, and of the various col- 
 leges and universities. With this end in view the Foundation 
 
16 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 corresponded not only with hundreds of individual teachers, and 
 with college and university authorities, but invited organizations 
 such as the Association of American Universities, the Association 
 of State Universities, the Association of American Colleges, and 
 the American Association of University Professors to criticize the 
 provisional plans proposed, and to set forth themselves such con- 
 structive measures as in their individual or collective judgment 
 were desirable or important. These exchanges occupied more 
 than two years, and afforded every opportunity for conference with 
 and the cooperation of those interested. 
 
 Finally, the Trustees of the Foundation appointed a commis- 
 sion to consider a provisional plan, and to report upon the funda- 
 mental principles of a pension system. Besides Trustees of the 
 Foundation, this commission contained representatives of the 
 various organizations just mentioned. The commission had the 
 assistance of expert actuaries. In their report to the Foundation 
 the commission stated in definite and carefully chosen words, the 
 fundamental principles of a sound pension system. These prin- 
 ciples fall into two groups, the one resting upon economic and 
 social considerations, the other upon actuarial and financial facts. 
 The principles thus formulated by the commission were the 
 following: 
 
 1. The function of a pension system is to secure to the individual who 
 participates in it protection against the risk of dependence due to old age or to 
 disability. 
 
 2. The obligation to secure this protection for himself and for his family 
 rests first upon the individual. This is one of the primary obUgations of the 
 existing social order. Society has done its best for the individual when it pro- 
 vides the machinery by which he may obtain this protection at a cost within 
 his reasonable ability to pay. 
 
 3. Men either on salary or on wages are, in the economic sense, employes. 
 The employer, whether a government, a corporation, or an individual, has a 
 direct financial interest in the establishment of some pension system which 
 shall enable old or disabled employes to retire under satisfactory conditions. 
 In addition, society demands today that the employer assume some part in the 
 moral and social betterment of his employes. The obligation of the employer 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 17 
 
 to cooperate in sustaining a pension system is primarily a financial one, and in 
 the second place, a moral one. 
 
 4. A pension system designed for any group of industrial or vocational 
 workers, should rest upon the cooperation of employe and employer. 
 
 5. Teachers' pensions should be stipendiary in character, amounting to a 
 fair proportion of the active pay. 
 
 II 
 
 1. In actuarial terms, a pension is a deferred annuity upon the life of one or 
 more individuals, payable upon the fulfilment of certain conditions. 
 
 2. In order that an individual participating in a pension system may be 
 assured of his annuity when due, one condition is indispensable: There must 
 be set aside, year by year, the reserve necessary, with its accumulated interest, 
 to provide the annuity at the age agreed upon. On no other conditions can 
 the participator obtain a satisfactory contract. The man of thirty who partici- 
 pates in a pension plan under which he expects an annuity thirty-five or forty 
 years in the future, will take some risk of disappointment in accepting any 
 arrangement less secure than a contractual one. 
 
 3. A pension system conducted upon the actuarial basis of setting aside, 
 year by year, the necessary reserve is the only pension system whose cost can 
 be accurately estimated in advance. 
 
 4. A method by which a pension is paid for in advance in annual or monthly 
 instalments is the most practical plan which can be devised for purchasing a 
 deferred annuity, provided that the contributions begin early in the employe's 
 career, and provided also that the contributions paid in year by year receive 
 the benefit of the current interest for safe investments. 
 
 5. As a matter of practical administration, a pension system should apply to 
 a group whose members live under comparable financial and economic condi- 
 tions. To attain its full purpose, participation in the pension system to the 
 extent of an agreed minimum, should form a condition of entering the service 
 or employment the members of which are cooperating in the pension system. 
 
 In addition to this formulation of the underlying principles of 
 a pension or annuity system, the commission pointed out that the 
 problem of affording protection to the teacher against dependence 
 in old age, both for economic and for financial reasons, should 
 be coordinated with that of protection for his family against de- 
 pendence in case of his premature death. In other words, an in- 
 surance contract covering the active period of a teacher's service 
 ought to articulate with an annuity contract when income earning 
 power diminishes. The question of obtaining such facilities 
 
18 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 through existing insurance companies was carefully considered, 
 and the opinions of actuaries and of the experts in state depart-^ 
 ments of insurance were obtained. These opinions were unani- 
 mous in recommending the creation of an agency specially devoted 
 to this purpose. The commission, therefore, approved and rec- 
 ommended to the Trustees of the Foundation a plan for an in- 
 surance and annuity company to be chartered under State law, 
 which should offer to teachers, as they enter their profession, 
 insurance and annuity contracts at net rates and in forms best 
 adapted to their needs. This recommendation has been carried 
 out by the establishment of the Teachers Insurance and Annuity 
 Association of America, chartered under the laws of the State of 
 New York, and supplied by the Carnegie Corporation, at the rec- 
 ommendation of the Foundation, with a capital and surplus of 
 one million dollars. In this agency is now provided the machin- 
 ery through which the teacher may obtain, through insurance and 
 annuity contracts, requisite protection for himself and for his de- 
 pendents. The handbook of the Association describes in detail 
 the various policies, their cost, and the arrangement under which 
 the premiums may be paid in annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or 
 monthly payments. Any information desired concerning the 
 policies of the Association can be had by addressing the Actuary 
 of the Association at 576 Fifth Avenue, New York City. 
 
 Unless one has had the time and the patience to read the Htera- 
 ture of old age pensions and of social insurance, he can not appre- 
 ciate at its full value the significance to the teaching profession 
 of the solution of the problem of old age pensions and teachers' 
 insurance thus worked out. Teachers themselves will perhaps 
 appreciate its significance only after the lapse of some years, 
 blinder the conditions thus established, a young instructor at 
 'thirty can carry five thousand dollars of insurance at an approxi- 
 mate cost of five dollars a month. By a similar monthly payment 
 in cooperation with his college, he may secure an annuity contract 
 which, if he lives to sixty-five, will provide an annual income of 
 one thousand dollars, or in case of death before that age, will be 
 added with its accumulations to the insurance payment. In a 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 19 
 
 word, the conditions have been estabhshed under which the am- 
 bitious and high-minded man entering the profession of the teacher 
 may, within his reasonable abihty to pay, protect himself and his 
 family, and may do this with full consciousness of manly inde- 
 pendence, of financial security, and of freedom in his profession. 
 By such a process as that described, the problem that Mr. 
 Carnegie set before his Trustees has been brought to a solu- 
 tion. 
 
 When the Trustees of the Foundation had determined upon the 
 wisdom of transforming the noncontributory pension system, up- 
 on which they had entered, into a contributory system of annuity 
 contracts, and of offering with these the insurance contracts that 
 would naturally supplement the annuities, they still had to decide 
 the question: What is a just and reasonable fulfilment of the ex- 
 pectations of the six thousand teachers now in the associated 
 institutions under the old rules? 
 
 While the Foundation had explicitly reserved from the begin- 
 ning the right to change the rules governing the granting of these 
 allowances, nevertheless there was a very natural tendency on 
 the part of the beneficiaries, both individuals and colleges, to 
 construe these privileges as contracts. The Trustees of the 
 Foundation in consultation with many teachers and college offi- 
 cials, as well as with high-minded and disinterested men of affairs, 
 sought to determine the question what would be a just and gener- 
 ous fulfilment of these expectations without involving the Founda- 
 tion in an unwarrantable use of trust funds for a very long period 
 of years to the exclusion of the claims of the great body of teachers 
 in the United States and Canada? In making such a determina- 
 tion the Foundation necessarily took counsel with the Trustees 
 of the Carnegie Corporation, to whose generous interest they 
 were indebted for the additional funds necessary to provide these 
 pensions for the distant future. 
 
 It was clear that teachers nearing retirement had expectations, 
 of a very different sort from those of young men twenty-five, 
 thirty, or forty years away from retirement, and who through the 
 Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association could at very small 
 
"20 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 <;ost supplement their pensions by additional annuities. To all 
 younger men in the associated colleges the facilities of the new 
 association were quite as valuable as to teachers in colleges not 
 associated with the Foundation. 
 
 The following plan was therefore adopted: For five years no 
 change is made. At the end of that period the minimum age of 
 retirement is raised, year by year, one year at a time, for a second 
 period of five years, by which time it has been brought to seventy 
 years. After the first five years, a teacher retiring before the 
 minimum age will receive an allowance diminished by one-fifteenth 
 for every year by which he anticipates the minimum age. This 
 arrangement will still require a very large expenditure, and one 
 that will absorb practically the whole income of the Foundation 
 for fifty years. In addition there will be expended the entire 
 principal and interest of one million dollars accumulated by 
 the Foundation and a large reserve fund of eleven millions of dol- 
 lars, contributed by the Carnegie Corporation for this purpose. 
 The Foundation will expend, during the next fifty years, some 
 sixty millions of dollars in carrying out the expectations of the 
 teachers in the associated institutions. 
 
 While the income of the Foundation will thus be devoted for 
 many years to come to the payment of pensions of teachers in the 
 associated colleges, its great endowment of fifteen millions of 
 dollars is untouched. Its income, as it is set free, will be devoted 
 to the advancement of teaching along such lines as the Trustees 
 of that day may decide. 
 
 The gift of the Founder of this institution was conceived in the 
 most generous spirit. It has enabled hundreds of college teachers 
 grown old in service to retire in comfort and security. As a per- 
 manent solution of the problem of the protection of teachers from 
 the risk of dependence, the plan originally adopted by Mr. Carne- 
 gie and by the Trustees of the Foundation was insufficient. It 
 has served its purpose. The real gain to colleges, both of the 
 associated Hst of institutions and of those not so related, hes in 
 the fact that the pension problem has been worked out and its 
 solution provided for upon a basis that is reasonable, sound, and 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 21 
 
 enduring. The solution of the fulfilment of reasonable expecta- 
 tions of teachers under the old rules that has finally been reached 
 is made possible by the generous aid of the Carnegie Corporation. 
 This solution is regarded by high-minded and thoughtful men 
 looking at the matter from a detached and disinterested point of 
 view as a most generous fulfilment of the expectations of these 
 teachers. It is believed that it will be so regarded by the teachers 
 themselves. 
 
 The obligations in this matter do not He wholly with the Trus- 
 tees of the Carnegie Foundation. There are also obligations 
 upon the teachers and the associated colleges who have been for 
 twelve years, and who will continue to be for fifty years to come, 
 the chief beneficiaries of the trust. The common obligations of 
 Trustees and beneficiaries have perhaps been nowhere better 
 stated than in the following words from the president of the 
 American Association of University Professors, in the presidential 
 address of four years ago : 
 
 The founder's idea was a noble and unique one; himself and his Trustees are 
 entitled to our heartiest gratitude and cordial sympathy. The grumbUng and 
 even hostile attitude sometimes exhibited is not justifiable. All parties can 
 and should approach the subject in a spirit of desire for frank exchange of views 
 and of mutual support. . . . The situation at the outset was novel; the 
 enterprise was in some degree inevitably experimental and alterable. The 
 Trustees were and are morally entitled to make such changes as may seem 
 -absolutely necessary; the propriety of fulfilling natural expectations of bene- 
 ficiaries being as obvious to the Trustees as to others. Whatever change of 
 plan is proposed will properly rest for its adoption upon the just and enlight- 
 ened judgment of the Trustees after full deliberation. 
 
 The story of the twelve years of the Carnegie Foundation here 
 briefly told touches a problem of vast importance to the people 
 and to the government of the United States. War pensions in 
 the past have constituted the greatest source of political demorali- 
 ization of which our government can be charged. The legislation 
 relating to our Civil War pensions is a monument to the weakness 
 of our legislators and our Presidents, with the notable exception 
 of Grover Cleveland. The increases of these pensions even 
 during the last year, a half century after the war ended, has 
 
22 MANltAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 raised the annual pension roll to a new and unheard of load of 
 $220,000,000. 
 
 We are now involved in a war in which the number of soldiers 
 engaged enormously exceeds that of the Civil War. If there 
 should follow upon the heels of peace such pension legislation as 
 followed the Civil War, no one can estimate the staggering sum 
 that may be imposed upon the country in the matter of pensions. 
 And the money cost is only the smallest part of the load. The 
 demoralization of such wholesale exploitation of the treasury of 
 the government is beyond words. It has in the past corrupted 
 parties, poisoned legislation, and spoiled the sweet taste of pa- 
 triotic devotion for millions of our people. 
 
 Very wisely our government is seeking to forestall such an event 
 by a generous system of insurance for soldiers upon the lines 
 adopted in the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association. 
 Our past experience, however, indicates that once the people are 
 taught to expect something for nothing, nothing short of an edu- 
 cation as to the fundamental principles of a pension will suffice to 
 prevent in the future a demand for free pensions more costly and 
 more demoralizing than those of the past. 
 
 The Trustees of the Foundation have sought honestly and sin- 
 cerely to apprehend and to state clearly the fundamental condi- 
 tions for a pension system that shall be effective but shall not 
 demoralize. In formulating these principles and in reconstruct- 
 ing their own system in accordance therewith, they have dealt in 
 a small way with a question with which the nation must deal on 
 a far greater scale. The Trustees have sought to discharge their 
 obhgation, not only to a trust and to a particular group in the 
 body politic but an obligation to the country as well. 
 
 Henry S. Pritchett. 
 
 February, 1919. 
 
APPENDIX 
 
 The following documents bearing upon the organization, 
 history and work of the Foundation are included in the 
 Appendix. 
 
 (1) The Letter of Mr. Carnegie establishing the trust. 
 
 (2) The Original Board of Trustees and the constitution of the Board as of 
 July 1, 1918. 
 
 (3) The Executive Officers. 
 
 (4) The Charter. 
 
 (5) List of Associated Colleges and Universities. 
 
 (6) List of PubUcations. 
 
 New York. April 16, 1905. 
 Gentlemen : 
 
 I have reached the conclusion that the least rewarded of all the professions is 
 that of the teacher in our higher educational institutions. New York City 
 generously, and very wisely, provides retiring pensions for teachers in her 
 public schools and also for her policemen. Very few indeed of our colleges are 
 able to do so. The consequences are grievous. Able men hesitate to adopt 
 teaching as a career, and many old professors whose places should be occupied 
 by younger men, can not be retired. 
 
 I have, therefore, transferred to you and your successors, as Trustees, 
 $10,000,000.00, 5% First Mortgage Bonds of the United States Steel Corpora- 
 tion, the revenue from which is to provide retiring pensions for the teachers of 
 Universities, Colleges, and Technical Schools in our country, Canada and 
 Newfoundland under such conditions as you may adopt from time to time. 
 Expert calculation shows that the revenue will be ample for the purpose. 
 
 The fund appUes to the three classes of institutions named, without regard 
 to race, sex, creed or color. We have, however, to recognize that State and 
 Colonial Governments which have established or mainly supported Universi- 
 ties, Colleges or Schools may prefer that their relations shall remain exclusively 
 with the State. I can not, therefore, presume to include them. 
 
 There is another class which states do not aid, their constitution in some 
 cases even forbidding it, viz.. Sectarian Institutions. Many of these estab- 
 lished long ago, were truly sectarian, but today are free to all men of all creeds 
 or of none — such are not to be considered sectarian now. Only such as are 
 under the control of a sect or require Trustees (or a majority thereof), Officers, 
 Faculty or Students to belong to any specified sect, or which impose any 
 theological test, are to be excluded. 
 
24 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 1 Trustees shall hold office for five years and be eligible for reelection. The 
 first Trustees shall draw lots for one, two, three, four or five year terms, so- 
 that one-fifth shall retire each year. Each institution participating in the 
 Fund shall cast one vote for Trustees. 
 
 The Trustees are hereby given full powers to manage the Trust in every 
 respect, to fill vacancies of non-ex-officio members; appoint executive com- 
 mittees; employ agents; change securities, and, generally speaking, to do all 
 things necessary, in their judgment, to secure the most beneficial administra- 
 tion of the Fimds. 
 
 By a two-thirds vote they may from time to time apply the revenue in a, 
 different manner and for a different, though similar purpose to that specified,^ 
 should coming days bring such changes as to render this necessary in their 
 judgment to,produce the best results possible for the teachers and for educa- 
 tion. 
 
 No Trustee shall incur any legal liabihty flowing from his Trusteeship. All 
 travelling and hotel expenses incurred by Trustees in the performance of their 
 duties shall be paid from the Fund. The expenses of a wife or daughter accom- 
 panying the Trustees to the Annual meeting are included. 
 
 I hope this Fund may do much for the cause of higher education and to 
 remove a source of deep and constant anxiety to the poorest paid and yet one 
 of the highest of aU professions. 
 
 Gratefully yours, 
 
 (Signed) Andrew Carnegie. 
 
 ijn view of the desirability of a permanent, self -perpetuating goyerniag 
 board, the provisions of this paragraph were, upon the advice and with the 
 consent of Mr. Carnegie, omitted from the Act of Incorpcwatiou which forms 
 the present charter of the Foundation. 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 
 
 25. 
 
 ORIGINAL TRUSTEES OF THE CARNEGIE 
 FOUNDATION 
 
 Hill McClelland Bell 
 
 President of Drake University 
 Nicholas Mukray Butler 
 
 President of Columbia University 
 T. Morris Carnegie 
 Edwin Boone Craighead 
 
 President of Tulane University 
 William Henry Crawford 
 
 President of Allegheny College 
 George Hutcheson Denny 
 
 President of Washington and Lee 
 University 
 Charles William Eliot 
 
 President of Harvard University 
 Robert A. Franks 
 
 President Home Trust Company 
 Arthur Twining Hadley 
 
 President of Yale University 
 William Rainey Harper 
 
 President of the University of 
 Chicago 
 Charles Custis Harrison 
 
 Provost of the University of 
 Pennsylvania 
 Edwin Holt Hughes 
 
 President of DePauw University 
 Alexander Crombie Humphreys 
 
 President of Stevens Institute of 
 Technology 
 
 David Starr Jordan 
 President of Leland Stanford Junior 
 University 
 
 Henry Churchill King 
 
 President of Oberlin College 
 Thomas McClelland 
 
 President of Knox College 
 Samuel Black McCormick 
 
 Chancellor of the University of 
 Pittsburgh 
 William Peterson 
 
 Principal of McGill University 
 Samuel Plantz 
 
 President of Lawrence University 
 Henry Smith Pritchett 
 
 President of the Massachusetts 
 Institute of Technology 
 Jacob Gould Schurman 
 
 President of Cornell University 
 Laurenus Clark Seelye 
 
 President of Smith College 
 Charles Franklin Thwing 
 
 President of Western Reserve^ 
 University 
 
 Frank Arthur Vanderlip 
 Vice President National City Bank 
 New York 
 
 WooDROW Wilson 
 
 President of Princeton University- 
 
26 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 PRESENT TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS OF 
 ADMINISTRATION 
 
 TRUSTEES 
 
 Akthur Twining Hadley, Chairman 
 Henry Churchill King, Vice Chairman 
 Charles Franklin Thwing, Secretary of the Board 
 
 William Lowe Bryan Thomas William Lamont 
 
 Marion Le Roy Burton Abbott Lawrence Lowell 
 
 Nicholas Murray Butler Samuel Black McCormick 
 
 Thomas Morris Carnegie William Peterson 
 
 William Henry Crawford Samuel Plantz 
 
 George Hutcheson Denny Henry Smith Pritchett 
 
 Robert Falconer Jacob Gould Schurman 
 
 Robert A. Franks Edgar Fahs Smith 
 Alexander Crombie Humphreys Frank Arthur Vanderlip 
 
 James Hampton Kirkland 
 
 Henry Smith Pritchett, President 
 Robert A. Franks, Treasurer 
 Clyde Furst, Secretary 
 
 New York Office : 576 Fifth Avenue, New York City 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 27 
 
 AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR 
 THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 
 
 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
 States of America in Congress assembled, 
 
 That the persons following, namely, Arthur T. Hadley, Charles William 
 EHot, Nicholas Murray Butler, Jacob G. Schiuman, Woodrow Wilson, L. Clark 
 Seelye, Charles C. Harrison, Alexander C. Humphreys, S. B. McCormick, 
 Edwin B. Craighead, Henry C. King, Charles F. Thwing, Thomas McClelland^ 
 Edwin H. Hughes, H. McClelland Bell, George H. Denny, William Peterson, 
 Samuel Plantz, David S. Jordan, William H. Crawford, Henry S. Pritchett, 
 Frank A. Vanderlip, T. Morris Carnegie, Robert A. Franks, their associates 
 and successors duly chosen are hereby incorporated and declared to be a body 
 corporate, of the District of Columbia, by the name of The Carnegie Founda- 
 tion for the Advancement of Teaching, and by that name shall be known and 
 have perpetual succession, with the powers, limitations and restrictions herein 
 contained. 
 
 Section 2. That the objects for which said corporation is incorporated 
 shall be — 
 
 (a) To receive and maintain a fund or funds and apply the income thereof 
 as follows : 
 
 To provide retiring pensions, without regard to race, sex, creed or color, for 
 the teachers of universities, colleges and technical schools in the United States, 
 the Dominion of Canada, and Newfoundland, who, by reason of long and 
 meritorious service, or by reason of old age, disabihty, or other sufficient reason, 
 shall be deemed entitled to the assistance and aid of this corporation, on such 
 terms and conditions, however, as such corporation may from time to time 
 approve and adopt: Provided, however. That the said retiring pensions shall 
 be paid to such teachers only as are or have been connected with institutions 
 not under control of a sect or which do not require their trustees, their officers, 
 faculties, or students (or a majority thereof) to belong to any specified sect, 
 and which do not impose any theological test as a condition of entrance therein 
 or of connection therewith. 
 
 (b) In general, to do and perform all things necessary to encourage, uphold 
 and dignify the profession of the teacher and the cause of higher education 
 within the United States, the Dominion of Canada, and Newfoundland afore- 
 said, and to promote the objects of the Foundation, with full power, however, 
 to the Trustees hereinafter appointed and their successors from time to time to 
 modify the conditions and regulations under which the work shall be carried on, 
 so as to secure the application of the funds in the manner best adapted to the 
 conditions of the time: And provided, That such corporation may by a vote of 
 two-thirds of the entire number of Trustees enlarge or vary the purposes herein 
 
28 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 set forth, provided that the objects of the corporation shall at all times be 
 among the foregoing and kindred thereto. 
 
 (c) To receive and hold by gift, bequest, devise, grant, or purchase, any- 
 real or personal property, and to use and dispose of the same for the purposes 
 of the corporation. 
 
 Section 3. That the direction and management of the affairs of the cor- 
 poration, and the control and disposition of its property and funds, shall be 
 vested in a Board of Trustees, twenty-five in number, to be composed of the 
 following individuals: Arthur T. Hadley, Charles William Eliot, Nicholas 
 Murray Butler, Jacob G. Schurman, Woodrow Wilson, L. Clark Seelye, Charles 
 O. Harrison, Alexander C. Humphreys, S. B. McCormick, Edwin B. Craighead, 
 Henry C. King, Charles F. Thwing, Thomas McClelland, Edwin H. Hughes, 
 H. McClelland Bell, George H. Denny, William Peterson, Samuel Plantz, 
 David S. Jordan, William H. Crawford, Henry S. Pritchett, Frank A. Vander- 
 lip, T. Morris Carnegie, and Robert A. Franks, being twenty-four in number 
 with power to said Board to increase the same to twenty-five in all, who shall 
 constitute the first Board of Trustees and constitute the members of the cor- 
 poration. Vacancies occurring by death, resignation, or otherwise shall be 
 filled by the remaining Trustees in such manner as the by-laws shall prescribe, 
 and the persons so elected shall thereupon become Trustees and also members 
 of the corporation. 
 
 Section 4. The principal office of the corporation shall be located in the 
 District of Columbia, but offices may be maintained and meetings of the cor- 
 poration or the Trustees and committees may be held in other places, such as 
 the by-laws may from time to time fix. 
 
 Section 5. The said Trustees shall be entitled to take, hold, and administer 
 any securities, funds, or property which may be transferred to them for the 
 purposes and objects hereinbefore enumerated, and such other funds or prop- 
 erty as may at any time be given, devised or bequeathed to them, or to such 
 corporation, for the purposes of the trust; with full power from time to time 
 to adopt a common seal, to appoint officers, whether members of the Board of 
 Trustees or otherwise, and such employes as may be necessary in carrying on 
 the business of the corporation and at such salaries or with such remuneration 
 as they may think proper; and full power to adopt by-laws and such rules or 
 regulations as may be necessary to secure the safe and convenient transaction 
 of the business of the corporation; and full power and discretion to invest any 
 principal and deal with and expend the income of the corporation in such man- 
 ner as in their judgment will best promote the objects hereinbefore set forth; 
 and in general to have and use all the powers and authority necessary to pro- 
 mote such objects and carry out the purposes of the donor. 
 
 The said Trustees shall have further power from time to time to hold as in- 
 vestments any securities transferred or which may be transferred to them or 
 ^to such corporation by any person, persons, or corporation, and to invest the 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 29 
 
 same or any part thereof from time to time in such securities and in such form 
 and manner as is or may be permitted to Trustees or to savings banks or to 
 charitable or literary corporations for investment, according to the laws of the 
 District of Columbia or in such securities as may be transferred to them or 
 authorized for investment by any deed of trust or gift or by any deed of gift or 
 last will and testament to be hereafter made or executed. 
 
 Section 6. That the said corporation may take and hold any additional 
 donations, grants, devises, or bequests which may be made in the further sup- 
 port of the purposes of the said corporation. 
 
 Section 7. That the services of the Trustees of the said corporation, acting 
 as Trustees, shall be gratuitous, but such corporation may provide for the 
 reasonable expenses incurred by Trustees in the performance of their duties. 
 
 Section 8. That as soon as may be possible after the passage of this act, 
 a meeting of the Trustees hereinbefore named shall be called by Henry S. 
 Pritchett, Charles William Eliot, Arthur T. Hadley, Nicholas Murray Butler, 
 Woodrow Wilson, Jacob G. Schurman, Charles C. Harrison, Alexander C. 
 Humphreys, and George H. Denny, or any six of them, at the Borough of 
 Manhattan, in the City and State of New York, by notice served in person, 
 or by mail, addressed to each Trustee at his place of residence; and the said 
 Trustees named herein, or a majority thereof, being assembled, shall organize 
 and proceed to adopt by-laws, to elect officers, fix their compensation, and gen- 
 erally to organize the said corporation. 
 
 The corporation hereby incorporated may accept a transfer of all real and 
 personal property of any other corporation created for similar objects, not- 
 withstanding the fact that both said corporations may have common Trustees, 
 upon such terms as may be agreed upon, and may receive, take over, and enter 
 into possession, custody, and management, of all such property, real and 
 personal. Provided, however, that such property shall be applied to the pur- 
 poses of the corporation hereby incorporated as hereinbefore set forth. 
 
 Section 9. That such corporation hereby incorporated, upon accepting a 
 transfer of all the real and personal property of such other corporation shall 
 eucceed to the obligations and liabilities and be held liable to pay and dis- 
 charge all the debts, liabilities, and contracts of any such corporation so exist- 
 ing, to the same effect as if such corporation hereby incorporated had itself 
 incurred the obligation or liability to pay such debt or damages. 
 
 Section 10. That Congress may from time to time alter, repeal, or modify 
 this act of incorporation, but no contract or individual right made or acquired 
 shall thereby be divested or impaired. 
 
 Section 11. This act shall take effect immediately on its passage. 
 
 Approved March 10, 1906. 
 
30 
 
 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 LIST OF ASSOCIATED INSTITUTIONS 
 
 Allegheny College 
 
 Meadville, Pennsylvania 
 Amherst College 
 
 Amherst, Massachusetts 
 Bates College 
 
 Lewiston, Maine 
 Beloit College 
 
 Beloit, Wisconsin 
 BowDOiN College 
 
 Brunswick, Maine 
 University of California 
 
 Berkeley 
 Carleton College 
 
 Northfield, Minnesota 
 Carnegie Institute of Technology 
 
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
 Case School of Applied Science 
 
 Cleveland, Ohio 
 Central University of Kentucky 
 
 Danville 
 University of Cincinnati 
 
 Cincinnati, Ohio 
 Clark University 
 
 Worcester, Massachusetts 
 Thomas S. Clarkson Memorial 
 College op Technology 
 
 Potsdam, New York 
 CoE College 
 
 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 
 Colorado College 
 
 Colorado Springs 
 Columbia University 
 
 New York City 
 Cornell University 
 
 Ithaca, New York 
 Dalhousie College and University 
 
 Halifax, Nova Scotia 
 Dartmouth College 
 
 Hanover, New Hampshire 
 
 Dickinson College 
 
 Carlisle, Pennsylvania 
 Drake University 
 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 Drury College 
 
 Springfield, Missouri 
 Franklin College of Indiana. 
 
 Franklin 
 Grinnell College 
 
 Grinnell, Iowa 
 Hamilton College 
 
 Clinton, New York 
 Harvard University 
 
 Cambridge, Massachusetts- 
 HoBART College 
 
 Geneva, New York 
 Indiana University 
 
 Bloomington 
 Johns Hopkins University 
 
 Baltimore, Maryland 
 Knox College 
 
 Galesburg, Illinois 
 Lawrence College 
 
 Appleton, Wisconsin 
 Lehigh University 
 
 South Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 
 Leland Stanford Junior Uni- 
 versity 
 
 Stanford University, California 
 McGiLL University 
 
 Montreal, Quebec 
 Marietta College 
 
 Marietta, Ohio 
 Massachusetts Institute of Tech- 
 nology 
 
 Boston 
 University of Michigan 
 
 Ann Arbor 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 
 
 31 
 
 MroDLEBUBY College 
 
 Middlebury, Vermont 
 University of Minnesota 
 
 Minneapolis 
 University of Missouri 
 
 Columbia 
 Mount Holyoke College 
 
 South Hadley, Massachusetts 
 New York University 
 
 New York City 
 Oberlin College 
 
 Oberlin, Ohio 
 University of Pennsylvania 
 
 Philadelphia 
 University op Pittsburgh 
 
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
 Polytechnic Institute of Brook- 
 lyn 
 
 Brooklyn, New York 
 Princeton University 
 
 Princeton, New Jersey 
 Purdue University 
 
 Lafayette, Indiana 
 Radcliffe College 
 
 Cambridge, Massachusetts 
 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 
 
 Troy, New York 
 RiPON College 
 
 Ripon, Wisconsin 
 University op Rochester 
 
 Rochester, New York 
 Rose Polytechnic Institute 
 
 Terre Haute, Indiana 
 Smith College 
 
 Northampton, Massachusetts 
 Stevens Institute op Technology 
 
 Hoboken, New Jersey 
 :Swarthmore College 
 
 Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 
 February, 1919. 
 
 University of Toronto 
 
 Toronto, Ontario 
 Trinity College 
 
 Hartford, Connecticut 
 Tufts College 
 
 Tufts College, Massachusetts 
 TuLANE University op Louisiana 
 
 New Orleans 
 Union University 
 
 Schenectady, New York 
 Vanderbilt University 
 
 NashviUe, Tennessee 
 Vassar College 
 
 Poughkeepsie, New York 
 University of Vermont 
 
 Burlington 
 University of Virginia 
 
 Charlottesville 
 Wabash College 
 
 Crawfordsville, Indiana 
 Washington and Jefferson Col- 
 lege 
 
 Washington, Pennsylvania 
 Washington University 
 
 St. Louis, Missouri 
 Wellesley College 
 
 Wellesley, Massachusetts 
 Wells College 
 
 Aurora, New York 
 Wesleyan University 
 
 Middletown, Connecticut 
 Western Reserve University 
 
 Cleveland, Ohio 
 Williams College 
 
 WiUiamstown, Massachusetts 
 University op Wisconsin 
 
 Madison 
 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 
 
 Worcester, Massachusetts 
 Yale University 
 
 New Haven, Connecticut 
 
 Total— ?6 
 
32 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 
 THE ANNUAL REPORTS 
 
 These contain in each instance: (I) An account of the business of the year, 
 including the meetings of the Trustees and of the Executive Committee, the 
 admission of institutions to the associated list, the voting of retiring allowances, 
 and the general administration of the trust; (II) sundry results of inquiry into 
 educational problems that affect the advancement of teaching. Some refer- 
 ence to these records is given in the following summaries ; (III) brief biographies 
 of recipients of retiring allowances who have died during the year; and (IV) 
 the report of the Treasurer. 
 
 The First Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 84 pages. 
 
 1906. 
 
 Including an historical sketch of the Foundation; a study of army and 
 
 professorial pensions; and a statement of the general policy, the educational 
 
 standards, and the administrative rules of the Foundation. {Out of print.) 
 
 The Second Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 124 pages. 
 1907. 
 Including discussions of the place of the college and the university in the 
 United States, the function of college entrance requirements, the forms of 
 denominational control, the relation of the Foundation to denominational 
 and State institutions, and the ratio between institutional cost and 
 efficiency. {Out of print.) 
 
 The Third Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 211 pages. 
 1908. 
 Including academic and financial data concerning institutions on the ac- 
 cepted list; and discussions of the problems of financial reports, pensions, 
 and life insurance; of the governmental and political aspects of tax-sup- 
 ported institutions; of entrance requirements, instruction, higher and 
 professional education, and of the influence of denominational boards of 
 education. 
 
 The Fourth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 201 pages. 
 1909. 
 Including discussions of the rules for retirement, of agricultural education, 
 of college administration and advertising, and complete records of the 
 practice of the institutions on the accepted list of the Foundation in ad- 
 mitting regular, conditioned, and special students. 
 
 The Fifth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 113 pages. 
 1910. 
 Including discussions of the relation of colleges to professional, technical, 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 33 
 
 and industrial education, to secondary schools, to the training of teachers, 
 and to State supervision; together with the comments of Oxford tutors oa 
 American education as represented by Rhodes scholars. 
 
 The Sixth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 154 pages. 
 1911. 
 Including discussions of the application of the rules for retirement, and 
 the obligations and influences of pension systems; together with a critical 
 and constructive survey of education from a national point of view, as this 
 is reflected in legislation. State systems, regional conditions, the relations 
 of school, college, and university, in professional and graduate study and 
 religious education, and in the problems of political and alunmi influence. 
 
 The Seventh Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 194 pages. 
 1912. 
 Including discussions of actual and possible systems of college pensions; 
 State, district, and local pensions for public school teachers; industrial 
 and civil service pensions; contributory and noncontributory, subsistence 
 and stipendiary pensions in general; and a review of the administrative, 
 financial, and educational experience of the Foundation; together with 
 comments upon admission to college and to advanced standing, medical 
 progress, college financial reporting, advertising in education, education 
 and pontics, and sham universities. 
 
 The Eighth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 158 pages. 
 1913. 
 Including discussions of recent pension developments, of the Carnegie 
 Corporation of New York, of the establishment of the Division of Educa- 
 tional Enquiry and its studies of medical education, education in Vermont, 
 and legal education ; together with comments on college entrance require- 
 ments, the State regulation of higher education, politics and education in 
 Iowa, the improved financial status of college teachers, and college cata- 
 logues. 
 
 The Ninth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 154 pages. 
 1914. 
 Including discussions of pension principles and of recent developments in 
 the field of teachers, industrial, and federal pensions; records of the prog- 
 ress of the Foundation's studies of legal education, engineering education, 
 and the training of teachers; comments upon the results of its Study of 
 Education in Vermont and upon recent developments in medical educa- 
 tion; and discussions concerning educational standards. State educational 
 reports, and educational surveys. 
 
 The Tenth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 142 pages. 
 1915. 
 Including discussions of pensions for public school and for university 
 
34 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 teachers, clergy pension funds, and industrial pensions, with tabular 
 statements of 65 teachers and 58 industrial and institutional pension 
 systems; together with reports of the progress of the Foimdation's studies 
 of legal education, engineering education, and the training of teachers in 
 Missouri, the results of its study of Education in Vermont; and a discus- 
 sion of college charges for tuition. 
 
 Cumulative Index of the First Ten Annual Reports, 78 pages. 1916. 
 
 The Eleventh Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 172 
 pages. 1916. 
 Including discussions of a comprehensive plan of insurance and annuities 
 for college teachers with the comments of the Associated Institutions, and 
 discussions of teachers, industrial, and clergy pension funds in general; 
 together with reports of progress in the Foundation's studies of legal 
 education, engineering education, agricultural education, and the training 
 of teachers; and a study of college entrance certificates, with suggestions 
 
 ! for a uniform blank. 
 
 The Twelfth Annual Report of the President and of the Treasurer, 154 
 pages. 1917. 
 Including discussions of insurance and annuities for college teachers, with 
 the report of a Conmiission on Insurance and Annuities and the charter of 
 the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America; descriptions 
 of current developments in the general field of pensions; and reports of 
 progress in the Foundation's educational enquiries. 
 
 THE BULLETINS 
 
 Number One. Papers Relating to the Admission of State Institutions to the 
 System of Retiring Allowances of the Carnegie Foundation, 45 pages. 
 1907. 
 Including arguments in favor of the admission of State and provincial 
 universities to the benefits of the Foundation, and a statement by the 
 President of the administrative and financial problems involved. {Out of 
 print.) 
 Number Two, The Financial Status of the Professor in America and in 
 Germany, 101 pages. 1909. 
 A study of the expenditure for instruction in one hundred and fifty-six 
 American institutions, with comparisons of the maximum and average 
 salaries, the average age, the amount of teaching, the appointment, tenure, 
 and retirement privileges of professors in the United States and Canada 
 and in Germany. (Out of print.) 
 Number Three. Standard Forms for Financial Reports of Colleges, Uni- 
 versities and Technical Schools, 37 pages. 1910. 
 Containing twenty-five typical blank forms for the public reporting of the 
 
FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 35 
 
 financial receipts and expenditure of universities and colleges, with an 
 introduction recommending the modification of current practice in direc- 
 tions commended by educators, financiers, and accountants. {Out of 
 print; a new edition is in preparation.) 
 
 Number Four. Medical Education in the United States and Canada, 346 
 pages. 1910. 
 A comprehensive report to the Foundation, by Abraham Flexner, on 
 medical education in the United States and Canada, with regard to the 
 course of study, financial aspects, medical sects, State boards, post-gradu- 
 ate schools, and other special forms of medical education; with descriptive 
 and tabular accounts of all the medical schools throughout the United 
 States and Canada; and a general plan for reconstruction, with an introduc- 
 tion by the President of the Foundation. 
 
 Number Five. Academic and Industrial Efficiency, 134 pages. 1910. 
 A report to the Foundation, by Morris Llewellyn Cooke, on the teach- 
 ing and research in physics in eight American universities, colleges, and 
 technical schools, with an endeavor to estimate efficiency in organization, 
 teaching, research, the use of buildings, and in financial, departmental, 
 and student administration, (Out of print.) 
 
 Number Six. Medical Education in Europe, 357 pages. 1912. 
 A report by Abraham Flexner concerning the contemporary condition in 
 Germany, Great Britain, and France, of the basis of medical education, 
 the preliminary and the medical sciences, clinical instruction, curricula 
 and examinations, post-graduate education, the medical education of 
 women, the number and distribution of physicians, the financial aspects 
 of medical education, and the problem of sects and quacks; together with 
 an introduction by the President of the Foundation, contrasting these 
 European conditions with those in the United States and Canada. 
 
 Number Seven. Education in Vermont, 241 pages. 1914. 
 A study prepared at the request of the Vermont Educational Commission, 
 giving the reason for and the method of the enquiry, description and dis- 
 cussion of the entire educational system of the State, with certain conclu- 
 sions and recommendations, and a brief statistical appendix. 
 
 Number Eight. The Common Law and the Case Method in American 
 University Law Schools, 84 pages. 1914. 
 A report to the Foundation by Joseph Redlich, of the University of 
 Vienna, dealing with law as a science and a profession, early methods of 
 legal instruction, the development and success of the Case Method, its 
 weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement in legal instruction, scholar- 
 ship, and research. 
 
 Number Nine. A Comprehensive Plan of Insurance and Annuities for Col- 
 lege Teachers, 68 pages. 1916. 
 A discussion, by the President of the Foundation, of pensions, annuities, 
 
36 MANUAL OF THE CARNEGIE BENEFACTIONS 
 
 and life insurance in general and for teachers in particular, with indications 
 of the limitations of the Foundation's present system and suggestions for 
 the development of a comprehensive and permanent plan. 
 (Confidential edition for officers and professors of the institutions that are 
 associated with the Foundation, October, 1915. Reprinted, with a 
 preliminary statement, for general distribution, April, 1916.) 
 
 Number Ten. Federal Aid for Vocational Education, 127 pages. 1917. 
 A study, by I. L. Kandel, dealing with the legislative history of the various 
 acts for the establishment and support of land grant colleges, the poUtical 
 and educational policies underlying this form of legislation, the develop- 
 ment of the land grant colleges and their relation to social demand, and 
 the influence of the precedents established by these acts on the recent move- 
 ment for federal aid for vocational education. 
 
 Number Eleven. Engineering Education, 135 pages. 1918. 
 A study, by Charles Riborg Mann, at the request of a joint committee 
 of the national engineering societies, of the development of engineering 
 schools in the United States, — their aims, resources, administration, cur- 
 ricula, instruction, and student progress; the chief problems of engineering 
 education, — admission, curricula, courses, testing, and grading; with sug- 
 gestions concerning the curriculimi, speciahzation, teaching, and the pro- 
 fessional spirit. 
 
 Number Twelve. Pensions for PubHc School Teachers, 90 pages. 1918. 
 A report, by Clyde Furst and I. L. Kandel, for the Committee on Sal- 
 aries, Pensions, and Tenure of the National Education Association, 
 describing all existing systems of pensions for teachers, discussing their 
 limitations in the light of experience and the fundamental principles for 
 pensions, and presenting an illustration of a financially and socially sound 
 State system of pensions for teachers, based upon a complete census of 
 the teachers in the State of Vermont. 
 
 OTHER PUBLICATIONS 
 
 Rules for the Admission of Institutions and for the Granting of Retiring 
 
 Allowances, 16 pages, 1906. Revised, 12 pages. 1908; 12 pages. 1910; 
 
 10 pages. 1913; 12 pages. 1918. 
 A Plan for an Exchange of Teachers between Prussia and the United States, 
 
 7 pages. 1908. 
 An American Teacher's Year in a Prussian Gynmasium, 37 pages. 1911. 
 Curricula designed for the Professional Preparation of Teachers for American 
 
 Public Schools, 60 pages. 1917. Provisional suggestions for discussion. 
 List of Pubhcations, 16 pages. 1917. 
 Bulletins on Legal Education, the Training of Teachers, and Justice and the 
 
 Poor are in press. 
 
14 DAY USE 
 
 RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED 
 
 LOAN DEPT. 
 
 This book is due on the last date stamped below, or 
 
 on the date to which renewed. 
 
 Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. 
 
 9m 
 
 un' 
 
 bscr 
 
 
 uO 
 
 — , - '.. :l^ iff* _ 
 
 1970 S ti 
 
 ^^^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 JVJUY5 
 
 1987 
 
 mjLTTm 
 
 A^^ Z7- 
 
 AUG 4 1987 
 
 LD 21A-50m-8,'57 
 (C8481sl0)476B 
 
 General Library 
 
 University of California 
 
 Berkeley 
 
w^^^m^Wt^'^ 
 
 
 
 ^^^"S^^m**- 
 
 lU O Z'+u/ 
 
 
 U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES 
 
 398585 
 
 UNIX'ERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVEESITY OF CALIFOENIA LIBEARY,