THE CHURCH 
 
 OF 
 
 THE MIDDLE AGES.
 
 THE CHURCH OF THE MIDDLE AGES, 
 
 SERMON, 
 
 ?|reacf)fU in tfje Cfjurc!) of ^t. iBary Uf UoUt, 
 GLOUCESTER, 
 
 MOXDJi; MJV 8, 1837, 
 
 AT THE VISITATION 
 
 OF THE 
 
 VENERABLE JOHN TIMBRILL, D.D. 
 
 ARCHDEACON OF GLOUCESTER. 
 
 BY 
 
 JOHN GOULTER DOWLING, M.A. 
 
 OK WAUHAM COLLEGE, OXFORD, 
 RECTOR OF ST, MARY DE CRVI'T, GLOUCESTER. 
 
 LONDON: 
 I'OIl .1. 'i. AM> I. Kl\ IN(i ION; 
 
 AM) J. I.. LF.A, T. JI.W, AND L. URYAM, ULOI CKSTKn. 
 
 18.'J7.
 
 GI.OTJCESTER : 
 A. A\n 1), M. WALKER, PRINTERS, 
 
 Wedlgate-Strcet.
 
 T(l THK 
 
 VKNKltABLi: JOHN TIM BRILL, 1)1). 
 
 vnCllDKACON OI (il.orCF-STKR, 
 
 .KSn TIIF, 
 
 HKVKI^KND J'HE CLKRGV 
 
 OF Tur: 
 
 i)i;\Ni'.p\ <>) (.i.(ii"CKsTi:i: 
 
 THIS sKinroN 
 
 1^ iJi'si'KCTii I I > i\s(i;iiii.i»
 
 The JVriter fias found it itnposnible to co/nmif this Serntoii 
 to the presn icithout uppe)iding aoiiie Noten. He knows not 
 whether he should apologise for their being so few, or so many. 
 Should any complaint be made on the ground of their number, 
 his excuse, which he cannot but think a very sufficient one, is 
 the copiousness of the subject. If tltey are thought fewer than 
 the text requires for its complete illustration, he can only say 
 that he would have been glad to make them more numerous, 
 but that he considered himself bound to answer the call of his 
 Brethren icithout delay. 
 
 Glmicester, May 1'), 1837.
 
 A SERMON. 
 
 St. Matthew xxviii. 20. 
 
 " Lo, I AM WITH YOU ALWAY, EVEN UNTO 
 THE END OF THE WORLD." 
 
 The passage in connection with these words 
 presents us with a very striking picture. A few 
 poor and dejected men are gathered together in a 
 solitary spot, in expectation of one whom they 
 had learned to love and to venerate as a being 
 more than human. Their mysterious visitor soon 
 joins them, and they bow before him in speech- 
 less wonder. Great indeed is the contrast be- 
 tween those feeble dou])ting worshippers, and 
 Him who "came and spake unto tliem, saying. 
 All power is given unto me in heaven and in 
 earth." It is, however, just the dilTerencc be- 
 tween man and (Jod. Jn the one we see our- 
 Helves ; in the otlnr we see our Redeemer. 
 
 It was on this interesting occasion, when the 
 A])ost]('S ('xliil)iti(l the vcrv cxcmplificalion of 
 mora] and j)hysical weakness, and our Loid had 
 iissertcd in the most emplialic words liis attribute 
 <of omnij)oteuc<'. that he solemnly gave them their 
 
 B
 
 10 
 
 commission — " Go ye therefore, and leach all 
 nations, haptizing them in the name of the Father, 
 and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching 
 them to observe all things whatsoever I have 
 commanded you." They might have pleaded 
 their inability to undertake such a work in their 
 own strength. He therefore' adds the promise, 
 " Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of 
 the world." 
 
 We recognize in the command given by our 
 Lord to the Apostles, the commission of an Apos- 
 tolical Ministry in all ages. And this view of 
 the words has been so often and so ably esta- 
 blished, that it is quite needless on an occasion 
 such as the one on which we are assembled, even 
 to allude to the arguments by which it is sup- 
 ported. We regard the promise too, as intended 
 to apply to the successors of the Apostles in the 
 ministerial office, as well as to the Apostles them- 
 
 ^ M« yap /j,oi rhv ^uaKoxlav, (pi^riv, siitan tuv ispxyixccrm' 
 iya yap il/xt /j,eff 'u(jimv, q TravTa Ttoim suKO^a. S. Chrysost. in 
 loc. Tom. II. p. 551. Edit. Savil. 
 
 yia^nTBuvai yap auTOvi Travra ra eSvjj HsMucra;, xa) Trpoei^uiy 
 wj 0£Of, cuj >.oyi(TiMi ava^aivoucriv Iv raTg xapdian; ai/Tuv^ TTug 
 olov T£ 'iv^ena av^pag TrevvTai, Koi £i/y>>uTTiag sa-TSp-n/xsvoui, Taaav 
 Trw oUou/xBvw iJ.tra^a>.{ir b\U(Te Tr)V a/jLipi^oMav^ km to Jeoj 
 £|£j3a?*fv, Eipmuiy Ka\ l^ou kya //.sff vnuv iliJi.i Trajag ra; vfJLepag^ 
 £Ui TYii (TirJT£\£l(x,g Tou aiuvog. B. Theodoret. Interpret, in .Terft- 
 mia* cap. i. v. 8. Tom. ii. p. 407. Edit. Sohulze.
 
 11 
 
 selves. For they equally stand in need of sup- 
 port, and they are servants of the same gracious 
 Master. 
 
 Regarding, therefore, the words of the text in 
 this light, and believing, as we do, that every 
 word of God must have its fulfihnent, we are 
 certain that the Lord's promise has l)een accom- 
 plished. He has ever been with his Church.' 
 He has never ceased to bless the work of his 
 Ministers. He has always been present in the 
 administration of the sacraments, blessing with 
 supernatural powers the cleansing waters of 
 Baptism, and communicating himself in the 
 blessed Eucharist.- When his Ministers have 
 
 1 " Quia Veritas ipsa dicit iteruni, Ecce ego robiscum sum omnibus 
 diebus usque ad consummationem seculi, procukiubio eiunt semper in 
 Ecclesiii, ruin quibus ille sit, eruntque fortissimi ac robustissimi 
 pugnatores Dei, adversum quos ille qui nunc ligatus est in abysso, 
 solutus, totis viribus perniittetur belligerare, quos divina gratia 
 idoneos rcddet adversum tam immanem bestiam diniicaro, <•( victoros 
 de ea existt^re." S. Agi^bard. dii I'rivil. et.Iurc Saccrdotii. Tom. i. 
 p. 1.38. Kdit. Baluz. 
 
 - 'AvToj o\ KM vuv £7t\ tyi; KoXuu$ridj>3ii roli 7ri(rTtaoii<Ttv aofarwc 
 iplfTarcn' at/rof TrtpiTrrvrffncu roug vioip^ri(Trou( uf ^/xoi/f Kai 
 ahx^ou;' km xi-/f» Trpof ai/Toui^ x^'^f'^- outTOf tu^po<xvvyii km 
 X«p«J ifjLTTtTrXi^Tiv a'jxlv rag Kap^la^ km rif •vj.t/xif. avroj 
 Toi/f pvTTuvTai a7ro7T\uv(i Toiti T»!f x^jSiTo; vsifMxa'tv. ai/Tog tou( 
 avayiWiifxtvoui Xfni tw n:jpu roli llviufjuiTOf. ainoi rpo^tli outuv 
 ylviTM KM rpoipn. S. Gregoriua (I'aU. .Antiucli. .070 - .OIW, ) in 
 .Mulierri* FnRUontif»Tn>«. ap. ('<iml»<»fmii Nfiv. Aiict, F^il>l. I'i'. 
 7'oin. I. <vi| H4.'>. It.
 
 12 
 
 proclaimed the tidings of salvation, and "taught 
 that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, men 
 should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in 
 this present world,"' he has caused his word to 
 come Tvith power, imparting to it a living energy. 
 And " where two or three have been gathered 
 together in his name, there has he been in the 
 midst of them."^ 
 
 We further believe that the promise is being 
 accomplished still. We regard ourselves as going 
 forth to our work supported by the presence of 
 our Master. That, feeble though we be in our- 
 selves, the power of God "is made perfect in our 
 weakness."^ That we are endued with the powers 
 with which he has been pleased to intrust the 
 Ministry for the edification of the Church. And 
 that to us he will, in the exercise of his wisdom 
 and goodness, vouchsafe his blessing. 
 
 But here I panse ; for it would ill become any 
 one standing in this place, on an occasion like the 
 present, to substitute assertion for argument, or 
 decline giving an answer to any fair ol)jection 
 that may be raised against our principles. We 
 regard the text as affording the guarantee of the 
 Saviour's promise for the perpetuity of the 
 Church. But it is objected, that in this sense it 
 has not been fulfilled. That this is so far from 
 
 > T\i\\%. II. 12 2 Matt. xvin. 20. :< 2 Cor. x\\. 9.
 
 13 
 
 having been the case, that during a long course 
 of ages, error and false doctrine overran what 
 was called the Christian world, and utterly de- 
 stroyed the simplicity of the Gospel. This 
 objection threatens to remove from us one of the 
 firmest warrants we can find in the sacred volume 
 for support in the trials and difficulties of our 
 ministry, and even lirings into question the vera- 
 city of the Saviour. My present ol)ject, therefore, 
 is, in dependence on Divine help, to attempt to 
 meet it. I have chosen this as the subject of to- 
 day's discourse, not because I am not fully aware 
 of its difficulty,; not because I am not conscious 
 of the hazard to which it must be exposed in hands 
 so feeble; but as having been led to deem it of 
 urgent necessity that our attention should be 
 directed to it in the present condition of the 
 world and of the Church. 
 
 The members of the Clmrcli of Kngland are, 
 it must b(! confessed, very unfavourably situated 
 for arriving at a proper estimate of tlic condition 
 of the Churcli (hiring tlie period usually denomi- 
 nated the Middle Ages. Enjoying as we do, by 
 the gracious Providence of (iod, a purity of doc- 
 trine and a simplicity of worsliij) truly aj)()stolical, 
 we are a|)f to look back fu limes less enlightened 
 with contempt and prejudice. We are so deeply 
 convinced of the scriptural tnilli of our creed, and 
 the primitive eliaraeter of our eerlosinsticnl polity.
 
 14 
 
 and see them so Avell ada[)ted to the wants of the 
 human mind, and of the human heart, in the exist- 
 ing state of society, that we are little accustomed 
 to look with indulgence upon the opinions which 
 were current in ruder periods, or to reflect whether 
 other states of society may not have had other 
 wants. This state of feeling Avould alone be 
 suflicient to make us unfair to the earlier Church. 
 But there is another circumstance which has had 
 a still more direct tendency to produce this effect. 
 I mean our constant warfare with tlie Church of 
 Kome. As that Church represents itself as iden- 
 tical with the Church of past times, and as it has 
 been too commonly admitted by Protestant con- 
 troversialists that it does actually correspond in 
 faith and discipline with the Western Church of 
 the Middle Ages^ many of us have come pretty 
 much to think, that in our controversy with Rome 
 we are virtually contending with the Church of 
 the period in question, and consequently regard 
 it with suspicion and jealousy. 
 
 I may remark too, that the measure wdiich has 
 sometimes been dealt out to those who have enter- 
 tained the more favourable opinion, has scarcely 
 contributed to bring us nearer to a correct view 
 of the subject. On the one hand they have been 
 denounced as admirers of the spiritual despotism 
 of an ignorant period; and on the other hand they 
 have been suspected of a secret inclination to the
 
 15 
 
 doctrines of Kome. But at all events, it is time 
 for us, my brethren, to submit the whole matter 
 to a serious and careful examination. If we are 
 not prepared to lose the warrant of our Ministry, 
 or to give up our Lord's promise as a signal in- 
 stance of a prediction not fulfilled, it becomes us 
 fairly and openly to meet the difficulty to which 
 I have referred. 
 
 Our Lord promised that he would ])e with his 
 Ministers " unto the end of the world ;" and yet 
 (we are told) during a long course of ages the 
 Church was in grievous ignorance of the truth, 
 and taught very dangerous errors. This is the 
 difficulty,' — which I have endeavoured to state 
 forcibly and fully. The subject is evidently one 
 that cannot properly be treated with ])revity.* 
 But it may perhaps be found possible to suggest 
 in a few remarks, considerations which may tend 
 to break the force of the objection, hi the ]io})e 
 of effecting this I would remark — 
 
 1 I would be understood as freely confessing my belief, flial if 
 tlie truth was not preserved in the Church, it was not preserv imI at all. 
 The notion that it was pri'sorvcd in separated cnminunities can 
 scarcely l>c regarded as any longer tenable. .\s to the All)igense8 
 and Wahlenscs, the distinction bt'twoen (hose sects, and the futility 
 of tlie attf'mpts to maintain the otiioiloxy of tiie one, and the anti- 
 quity of tlie other, seem to have been fully estalilished. 
 
 2 " Habebit tamcn in his iectoris mei curiosa vcstigatio, etsi 
 non copiam satietatis qui delecletur, qualenicunque lamen causam 
 inquisitionis, qua melius exerccafur." Walafridus Siraho de Hcbiis 
 Ecrlesia-iticis. Bibl. PP. Tom. iv. col. .'i7'2. r. Ivlit. 1.^7-''.
 
 16 
 
 I. That the fact which is assumed to 
 
 MILITATE AGAINST THE LITERAL FULFILMENT 
 
 OF OUR Lord's promise is greatly over- 
 stated ; and 
 
 II, That allowing to a certain extent 
 
 THE truth of the FACT ASSUMED AS THE 
 OBJECTION, IT still CANNOT IN ANY SENSE BE 
 REGARDED AS IMPEACHING HiS VERACITY. 
 
 In the first place, then, I humbly submit, that 
 it may safely be maintained, that the representa- 
 tions which are commonly made of the state of 
 the Church during the Middle Ages are unfair 
 and overcharged. The peculiar position of the 
 Anglican Church, to which I have already ad- 
 verted, has concurred with modern arrogance and 
 sciolism in producing a conventional estimate of 
 the elder period of the history of the existing 
 European nations, which those who have made 
 any kind of acquaintance with the original sources 
 of information know to be very far from correct. 
 There is reason, to think that the whole subject 
 has been very greatly misunderstood and misre- 
 presented. But no part of it has suffered more 
 than that which relates to religion. For here 
 additional agencies have been at work in pro- 
 ducing and per2)etuating error. The notions of 
 individual critics with regard to the interpretation
 
 17 
 
 of the prophecies,* have had very considerable 
 influence in forming and modifying the opinion 
 which generally prevails among us. And whole 
 generations have grown up in false views of his- 
 tory, because a writer of note has perhaps left 
 the straight path of literal interpretation, or mis- 
 taken the sense of a particular prediction. 
 
 The period which is represented as that of spi- 
 ritual darkness and degradation is comprised in 
 the thousand years which followed the extinction 
 of the Western Empire.^ Now, though it has 
 been very common to speak of the whole of this 
 long series of centuries as bearing the same 
 general characteristics, and as deserving to be de- 
 scribed in the same terms of oj)pro]H-ium and 
 contempt, a moment's reflection might lead any 
 one to exfiect that the various divisions of it 
 must dilfer very materially, and tliat the pecu- 
 
 J Tlie attempts wliidi have be^n made to establish a correspon- 
 dence between the ehiirdi of Rome and llie prophecies rehilinp to 
 Antichrist, have |)rol)ably done more than any tiling else towards 
 producing the <urrent notions respecting the state of religion in the 
 Middle Ages. The process which has been going on in perverting 
 history and garbling docnments to support tliis opinion, li;is i)een 
 exposed by Mr. .Maitland, in his writings on the I'iWdays — espe- 
 cially in his first " llnfjuiry." 
 
 - A variety of circumst;inces have induced the writer to confine 
 hin remarks in this discourse entirely to Western Christendom. He 
 trusLs, however, that one whos(> studi(>s have been chicHy among the 
 later Greek thcologi<al writers, and who hoj)i's liereafter to ofTcr 
 fuller proofs of the vitahty of the K;L'.tcin ( Inu'li, will not in the 
 m»»an time l>c .Hii«p«,T|pf| «if neglecting or undervjibiing il.
 
 IS 
 
 liarities of one age could not be found to exist, 
 in the same intensity at least, in another. And 
 this is the fact, A mere glance at the records of 
 Church-history is suflicient to convince us that 
 the condition and spirit of different periods in the 
 Middle Ages differ as they do in other times. 
 For somewhat more than two centuries the Church 
 maintained a doubtful conflict with the conquerors 
 of the Western world, alternately enriched and 
 despoiled by the superstition or violence of rude 
 chieftains. Better times' succeeded when the 
 earlier Carlovingians, who imited the dignity of 
 genius with military and political talents, had 
 learned to respect the character of the Clergy, 
 and to protect and encourage moral and intellec- 
 tual worth. The great feudal aristocracy which 
 was established under the later and more feeble 
 monarchs of this dynasty, w^as little favourable 
 to the prosperity of the Church. The Clergy 
 were gradually accustomed to seek from the ser^ 
 of Rome the protection which they could not 
 obtain from their native princes. The Popes at 
 length came to exercise an acknowledged sove- 
 reignty. The schoolmen grew up to inculcate 
 
 1 Lorenz's Life of Alcuin, whicli has recently been translated, 
 contains much interesting information of a popular character respect- 
 ing this period. But many of the German divines, even of the 
 better class, still speak with so much levity and indistinctness on 
 religious subjects, that it is often no easy matter to find out the 
 objects witli whicli they write, or the principles of the writers.
 
 19 
 
 the theology, and the canonists to maintain and 
 teach the laws, of Rome. Bnt this was at the 
 beginning of the thirteenth century. For it was 
 only at this late period that the system of Papal 
 dominion was fully developed. 
 
 Now^ it may be safely affirmed, that during the 
 first and second of the periods 1 have marked in 
 this rapid survey — that is, till the latter part of 
 the ninth century — the doctrine of the Church 
 remained very much what it had been in the days 
 of Jerome and Augustine.' There w^ere super- 
 stitions doubtless, (but this is a part of the sub- 
 ject to be noticed hereafter,) yet the substance of 
 Christian opinion remained wonderfully uniform.^ 
 The Churches on the North of the Alps had all 
 publicly recorded their disapprobation of image- 
 worship'* in the course of the eighth and ninth 
 
 1 Note A, in tlie Appendix. 
 - I say u'onderfalli/ iinit'onn, in reference to (he degree. But the 
 fact was a natural coMsiMjuence of the course of slmly pursued \)\ 
 all who studied at all. The ancient divines were iMi|»licitly followed 
 as teachers, and imitated as models, liy all whu sought to obtain or 
 to conmiunicatc theological knowledge. Towards the very end of 
 the ninth century, Notker, surnamed the Stammerer, a monk of Si. 
 Gall, who died in 9 1 "2, wrote to a friend re<-ommending him a course 
 of theological s(u<ly. 'I'his tract allnrdsa lr)iig list of ancient authors, 
 but only five who wrote later than the time of St. (iregory, namely, 
 Isidore of .Seville, Hhahanus of Mayence, Ilede, Alcuin, ami I^ad- 
 ken ; the last three natives of the British Isles. Notatio Nolkcri dc 
 lllustribus Viris. np. l-'ahricii Bihl. Me<lia' e( Inlim. Latinif. \'o!. 
 V. 0O4— D.VJ. 
 
 •' .Noll- H, III tlif .\pp<"ndi\.
 
 20 
 
 centuries ; and towards the middle of the hitter 
 some of the most eminent writers of Christendom 
 had vigorously opposed the novelty of transub- 
 stantiation.' In the following century perhaps, 
 while the Northmen and Hungarians cruelly 
 ravaged various provinces of the West, and an 
 ambitious nobility, whose privileges and power 
 rendered them so many independent rulers, 
 stripped the Church of its property, and diverted 
 ecclesiastical institutions from their legitimate 
 objects, error was on the increase — though piety 
 put forth some of its fairest blossoms and bore 
 some of its richest fruits.^ The eleventh century 
 too witnessed an opposition to false doctrine.^ 
 And if towards its close the claims of the Papacy 
 were generally acknowledged, we must remember 
 that such was the state of the times, that the 
 establishment of an ecclesiastical monarchy, 
 though a manifest violation of its original con- 
 
 1 Tlie book of Paschasius Radbertus (Abbot of Corbie) " de 
 corpore et sanguine Domini," written in 831, is allowed to have been 
 the earliest exposition of the Romish doctrine. The views which 
 it advocated were expressly opposed by Rhabanus Maurus, (Arch- 
 bishop of Mentz,) Ratramne, (a monk of Corbie,) and our country- 
 man, Joannes Scotus Erigena ; and incidental expressions of several 
 other writers of the centur}- shew that transubstantiation was not 
 then the received doctrine of the Church, 
 
 2 I would here make a general reference to the papers on the 
 Dark Ages, which during the last two years have appeared in the 
 British Magazine. 
 
 •' I allude to the controversy with Berengarius.
 
 21 
 
 stitution, undoubtedly afforded present relief and 
 safety to the Church.^ 
 
 In the middle of the twelfth century, "the last 
 of the Fathers" ^ was called to his rest, and the 
 Schoolmen then became the doctors of the Church. 
 From that era the current theology rapidly tended 
 towards the form presented by the modern doc- 
 trines of Rome. Still, however, there were few 
 barriers^ raised against the possibility of a return 
 to a Scriptural model. It was the social corrup- 
 tion, and those irregularities of the Clergy that 
 were in so great a degree to be attributed to the 
 Romish system now in full activity, which formed 
 the great scandal of Christendom. The mendi- 
 cant Orders — an invention of the adherents of 
 the Papacy, not the native growth of any national 
 church — spread superstition and ignorance among 
 the vulgar ; while the rise of modem litcn-ature,'' 
 
 1 Tlie great error of the adlieronls of tlie cliurcli of Home 
 has been in consecrating abuses. In mistaking a particular position 
 of the church for its natural condition. The pajiary wius during a 
 certain period an instrument of good. Like the (hctatorship, it was 
 salutary in its season— a tyranny when made perpetual. 
 
 2 St. Bernard (Abbot of Clairvaux) died in ll,').'}. The 
 " Master of the S<>ntences," (Peter Iyoml)ard, JJishop of Paris, 
 11.59 — I KV4, ) was therefore his contemporary. 
 
 ^ I'ield, of the Church, l^jok iii. i hap 7, and .\|i|i' ndix to 
 Book III. 
 
 * It is well for it to be distimtly borne in miml, tliat tin* niaicli 
 of intellect, though proceeding in our own times under peculiar 
 Hrf^im^tiincpM, i« no nmi'lfy. It rommencod crrtninly us e«rly
 
 22 
 
 niul, somewhat later, the enthusiastic study of 
 the ancient chissics among the higher and more 
 learned classes of society, tended to draw oil' men's 
 minds from religion altogether. It was not, 
 however, till the German Reformation had shaken 
 the whole fiihric of the Papal ascendancy, and the 
 church of England had reasserted her indepen- 
 dence of foreign domination, that the Romish 
 party took the last fatal step, and intrenched it- 
 self in an unsocial and schismatical position, from 
 which it would almost seem that it cannot he 
 dislodged hut hy some signal interference of the 
 providence of God. 
 
 So much then for the first consideration, namely, 
 that the state of the Church during the middle 
 ages is generally misapprehended. 
 
 II. I now come to the second position I ven- 
 tured to lay down, namely, that allowing (as I 
 freely do,) that the Church was during that long 
 interval greatly under the influence of supersti- 
 tion and error, this was not the case to such a 
 degree, or in such a way, as to involve any vio- 
 lation of the promise contained in the text. 
 
 as tlie thirteenth century. No one doubts the acuteness and 
 industry of the early Schoolmen, who were in their way as much 
 men of a " movement" as the German Rationalists. Italy, at all 
 events, before the end of that century, possessed a national litera- 
 ture. Dante was born in 123.5. And in the following century, 
 Boccaccio and Petrarca, and Chaucer too, were, m tliought and 
 feeling, moderno.
 
 23 
 
 In all inquiries of this natuir we ought con- 
 stantly to rememl)er, that it is aljsolntely impos- 
 sible for US to determine what quantity of gospel 
 truth is necessary for salvation,and that we are 
 quite unable to decide what amount of error Is 
 compatible with the soul's eternal safety. The 
 whole tenor of Scripture leads us to conclude that 
 what God regards in man is not the extent of his 
 know^ledge, but the sincerity of his faith ; and that 
 when the soul has cordially received the revealed 
 truth, whatever it may be, which is made known 
 to it, it is in a justified state, and has a personal 
 interest in the mercy of the gospel.' '' The 
 righteousness which is of faith speakcth in this 
 wise." ... '' That if thou shalt confess with thy 
 mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thy 
 heart that God hath raised him from the dead, 
 thou shalt l)e saved. "'^ Ignorance and error are 
 part of the lot of man in his present state of 
 degradation. At the ])est, " we have the treasure" 
 which (lod lias imparted "ineartlini vessels.""* 
 The analogy of Scripture would lead us to tliink 
 that there has never been a Saint, however great 
 his knowledge and holiness, who has attained on 
 earth a full conception of the whole scheme of 
 
 • "Nihil pcriciili, vcl damnationin inest liio, (|ui sunt in Cliristo 
 Jesn, ab ipso illuminali p(!r fidem." 'I'lioni. A(iuin. Secunda 2u«. 
 q. 2, :ir. .'J. 
 
 2 Rnm. X. r,, W. ' -1 Cnr. iv. "•
 
 21 
 
 salvation. \\\* coinniouly jiult^f upon this prin- 
 ciple of those around us. We make allowances 
 for those who differ from what we believe to be 
 the truth, on the ground of the imperfection of 
 the human understanding, and because we think 
 that certain dangerous errors and practices are 
 still compatible w^ith sincerity and the love of 
 truth. Let us carry this charity with us in our 
 inquiries into the past history of the Church, and 
 be equally candid in estimating the errors of an 
 opposite character* to those on which we are 
 so ready to look with indulgence. 
 
 The Church was setup as the pillar and ground 
 of the truth. The faith and the inspired docu- 
 ments to which in the providence of God the 
 faith was committed, were consigned to its keep- 
 ing. And so far as relates to its fidelity to this 
 solemn trust, the promise of God is pledged for 
 its indefectibility. Now the faith^ committed to 
 the Church was evidently the great fundamental 
 truth, "that God was in Christ reconciling the 
 world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses 
 
 J Note C, in the Appendix. 
 2 " Tiiis is then the foundaticm whereupon the frame of the 
 Gospel is erected ; that very Jesus whom the Virgin conceived of 
 the Holy Ghost, whom Simeon embraced in his arms, whom Pilate 
 condemned, wliom the Jews crucified, whom the Apostles preached, 
 lie is Christ, the Lord, the only Saviour of the world : other fou7t- 
 dation can no man lai/," Hooker, Discourse of Justification, § 23, 
 Works, vt)l. II r. p. 454. Edit. 1820.
 
 25 
 
 unto tliem." This was " the word of reconcili- 
 ation" which under the Gospel God committed to 
 his ministers. And this the Church has ever 
 faithfully preserved.' The doctrines of the 
 Trinity and the Incarnation she has ever main- 
 tained inviolate. Just as the Jewish Church, in 
 spite of all its transgressions and corruptions, did 
 its office in preserving the know^ledge of the unity 
 of God : so the Christian Church has under all 
 the circumstances of its history, maintained the 
 peculiar doctrines of the Gospel. Through the 
 times of the greatest darkness she has confessed 
 the faith in the very same terms as we do. The 
 thre3 creeds have, ever since they were first em- 
 ployed, distinctly exhibited the doctrines of the 
 Church. This is surely a signal proof of the 
 Saviours presence. For the greater we suppose 
 the ignorance and corruption of the Middle Ages, 
 the more difficult must it have been to preserve 
 soundness of doctrine in the most mvstcrious sub- 
 jects of Christianilv. 
 
 Well, Ijiit you aHow that there wore errors — 
 
 ' " Dixit DoniinuM C'liristiis, prtrdicabilur Evcmgelium in laii- 
 vetKO mundo, :ti) noii jxTiliicluiii est ad cxitmii f Item illml ; et 
 porta- infer t nun jira-valibuut adversun h'ccU-.siam, id est, !id\ crsuM 
 fidom nosfram, an hoc fnlsuni oxtitit ? an non extiteruiil plmimi 
 ha-rcsiarcliif, t} runni |>(i(ontiw*iiiii, ct Kegt'» iinpii, qui fuli'in oppug- 
 naniiil, necpic iaiin*ii potiicriint vinccrc cam, rf oxtinguerc ?" 
 Ana.^ta>tiiiM Althas cotitra .Jiidii-os, a|). CnniHii lyrlionc* .Ant. IsHif. 
 fia^nRgf. 'f'oni. ri. I', rii. p. I.^. 
 
 c
 
 ■26 
 
 yes, undoubtedly, serious and pernicious errors. 
 There was much superstiton, much ignorance, and 
 consequently much error. The imagination got 
 to have too much scope in holy things. Opinions 
 of uninspired men, and perversions of scriptural 
 truths, gradually came to be regarded as part of 
 Christianity. The superstitious practices of en- 
 thusiasts were admired and imitated. An extrava- 
 gant veneration for the sacraments tended to pro- 
 duce, what at last it did almndantly produce, false 
 doctrine and formality. We allow all this. Yet 
 we still believe that Christ was with his Church' 
 and his Ministers. For why might he not be ? 
 Surely he did not promise, w^hen he engaged to 
 be vy^ith them to the end of the world, that the 
 outward condition of society should continue un- 
 changed. He did not promise that mankind 
 should maintain the same degree of civilization. 
 But it is quite clear that all changes affecting the 
 condition of society must have more or less influ- 
 ence on the Church. What grew up within the 
 Church, was the natural result of what was going 
 on without. For the Church to have maintained 
 an uniform position in intelligence and sound 
 doctrine, the state of society must have remained 
 uniform too. We cannot help seeing that the one 
 could not but have affected the other. As society 
 
 1 Note D, in the Appendix.
 
 27 
 
 passed from the state in which it existed under the 
 Roman Empire, and assumed that form of greater 
 simplicity which it bore through the greater part 
 of the Middle Ages, it was inevitable that so 
 great a change should tell upon the Church. 
 Men in whom the imagination predominated 
 over the intellect, who were affected more by 
 feeling than by reasoning, craved after something 
 more material and sensible than what was sup- 
 plied by the letter of revelation, and they gradu- 
 ally adopted the growth of their own hearts as 
 part of the substance of their religious opinions. 
 This was just what was to have been expected. 
 It was after all, very much what had come to pass 
 in the divinely constituted " commonwealth of 
 Israel." Unless God had made such changes in 
 his providential government of the world as would 
 perhaps have interfered witli man's free-agency, 
 we see not how it could have been otherwise. 
 The facts I liavc conceded cannot fairly be urged 
 against the fuUilmcnt of our Lord's inoniise. l)e- 
 causc his ])rf)misc only ciii^aizcd Iiim 1o iircscrvc 
 the fundamental |)rinci|)les oi' the gos|)(l. and to 
 make them of jiractical eflicacy on ihc human 
 heart. 
 
 1 have hitlicrto su[)|)Osc(l the corrujjtious which 
 grew up in the ("liurch during tiie period we liave 
 in view, the natural effect of known causes, and 
 regarded them as being counteractive, so to speak. 
 
 c; 2
 
 28 
 
 of tlio purposes intended Ijy the Divine Author 
 of Christianity. I might perhaps safely go a 
 step further, and ask if there is not reason to 
 think that they were made the means of pro- 
 ducing most important good ? Nations in the 
 condition in which the inhabitants of We&tern 
 Europe were during the times in question, needed 
 much visible recognition of spiritual truths ; and 
 the very errors of the Church tended to cover the 
 face of the earth with the outward marks of re- 
 ligion. It is not easy to see how they could have 
 been preserved from absolute barbarism but by 
 the controlling influence of the priesthood ; and 
 minds such as theirs would have been little likely 
 to yield to this moral power but at the call of 
 superstition. Heathen tribes were to be con- 
 verted ; and we have been taught by our own 
 experience, that unless Omnipotence visibly in- 
 terfere, that is an object not easily or speedily 
 accomplished, when Christianity is presented to 
 them in its native purity, and is recommended 
 to them merely by moral suasion. As we can- 
 not see how in the usual order of the Divine 
 government, the state of religion could have been 
 otherwise than it was during the Middle Ages, 
 so we ought to be cautious how we venture to 
 pronounce that it was desirable that it should 
 have been otherwise. Let us take care that we 
 do not rashly assail a great and important chapter
 
 29 
 
 in the history of God's dealings with our species. 
 He who gave the Gospel, surely best knew, how 
 it would most effectually promote the benefit of 
 mankind. 
 
 To doubt that the Gospel was at work even in 
 the most corrupt periods of those times, is not 
 only to close our ears against the testimony of 
 contemporary history, but to shut our eyes to 
 what we might see around us. The writings of 
 contemporary annalists and biographers abound 
 with the most beautiful instances of the triumphs 
 of Divine grace. And when kings, and priests, 
 and penitents, yea and books too, have passed 
 away, — their good deeds are fresh and blooming 
 still. Our fairest temples and our noblest cha- 
 rities are most of them due to the worst portion 
 of those times — I mean the later portion — when 
 the march of improvement was fast bearing down 
 the simplicity of the earlier period. And what is 
 of still gr(;ater importance to us, it was then tliat 
 Christianity sunk so dcej) into our institutions 
 and legislation, thai it would recjuirt.' tlic liand of 
 violence to uproot it. \\ hilc, therefore, we arc; 
 thankful to the gracious Ciivcr for our greater 
 privih'gcs, ht lis krep up ii; our hearts •' the 
 communion of saints,' by entertaining a grateful 
 sense of what we owe to the ancient (liurcli ! 
 
 Ihil I liave trespassed (juite h)ng enougli upon 
 your attention. Ms brethren, we li\e in unusual
 
 30 
 
 times — in times of great excitement. 1 make 
 not allusion to the fact as intending to recur to 
 any exciting to])ic of present interest. It has 
 been a gratification to nie to liave been al)le to 
 select a subject for my discourse that is little of 
 kin to our every day matters of communication. 
 It is ever a privilege to be able to travel away 
 from the turmoil of the present into the dignified 
 stillness of the past. But let us not return un- 
 improved. We need all the comfort and all the 
 wisdom we can gather for our support and guid- 
 ance. i\.nd there is much, very much, to instruct 
 us, both in the fidelity with which the Lord has 
 observed his promise, and in the corruptions which 
 have been allowed to mar the beauty of the 
 Church. While the words of the text shine 
 brightly on the page of revelation we cannot 
 want consolation. The Church is founded upon 
 a rock ; and it is unbelief to doubt the gracious 
 promise, " Lo, I am with you alway, even unto 
 the end of the world." 
 
 We have seen that the chief danger of the 
 Church is in not adhering to ancient and Scrip- 
 tural principles, but in taking up the feelings of 
 the times and in working them into religion. 
 Let it be our care to search out and abide by the 
 great fundamental principles of the Gospel — to 
 cling to the truth which is taught in the word of 
 God : and where there is anv doubt about its
 
 31 
 
 interprelutioii, to employ the noble canon of re- 
 ceiving " what has been always, and universally, 
 and everywhere received in the Church."^ 
 
 Perhaps one of the most important lessons we 
 learn from inquiries of this nature is, the danger 
 there is in excessive opposition even to obvious 
 corruptions. There are many of the errors of the 
 Church of Rome that are hut exaggerated repre- 
 sentations of acknowledged truths. Many spring 
 from valuable and important principles. Let us 
 take care that we do not push our opposition too 
 far.^ Let us take care that while we attempt to 
 
 1 Ciim sit perfectus Scripturaruni canon, sibique ad omnia 
 satis, superque sufficiat, quid opus est ut ei ecclesiasticic intcUi- 
 genti.t jungatur auctoritas ? Quia videlicet Scripturam sacram pro 
 ipsa sua altitudine non uno eodemque sensu universi accipiunt; sed 
 ejusdem eloquia aliter atque aliter alius atque alius interpretatur ; ul 
 pent' quot homines sunt, tot illinc scntentia- enii posse videantur. — 
 In ipsa item catliolica Ecclesia magnopere lurandum est, ut id 
 teneamus quod ubique, quod semj)er, quod ab onuiibus creditum est. 
 Hoc est etenim vere proprieque, catholicuni (quod ipsa vis nominis 
 rati(ique dccjarat) quod omnia fere universaliter comj)reIicndit. 
 Sed hoc ita demuni tiet si sequamur univeisilalem, antiquitateiu, 
 consensionom. Scqucmur :iu(em universitatem hoc modo, si hant 
 unam tidem veram esse latcamur, quam (uta |)er orbeni terraruni 
 confitetur Kcdesia. Aniiquitatem vero ita, si ab his seiisibus nulhi- 
 tenuH recedamus, quos sancUjs Majores ac I'atrcs nostros «'elobiiisse 
 manifestum est. Consensioncm quoquc itidcm, si in ipsii vcdistafe, 
 omnium Sacordotum pariler el Magi^lrorum (K'fmitiones sentoii- 
 tiasque secfiMiiur. Vincent. I/criii. ( 'omnmnit. |) ."{17, •ilH. Jviit. 
 Halo/. 
 
 ' Qui nnir«- f|i' finji«'n<l(» (Mnirr Hoiicilus eHl, lanlmuquf* Iiuju'- 
 modi "ktudio intti")!!, ul xcriliili ipi fi<lem B'ljunci'ic n^m'l, aul illaiii
 
 'A2 
 
 cut away the excrescences, we do not wound the 
 precious substance to which they have adhered. 
 If any of us are called to controversy, let us be 
 careful in the choice of our weapons, and jealous 
 over ourselves that we engage in a right spirit,^ 
 There is no real good to be effected for any cause 
 by loose charges and ignorant or half-learned 
 declamation, by passionate extravagance and ill- 
 digested arguments.^ We can expect to be useful 
 in this field only when we possess an intimate and 
 extensive acquaintance with the subjects in dis- 
 pute, and contend for the faith in a sincere and 
 honest love of truth. 
 
 It must be quite unnecessary for me to remind 
 
 sibi insectandam sumat, ubique fallaciam sibi metuens: alia quidem> 
 via impingit, sed tamen impingit in errorem. Dubitare autem 
 possumus, utri miseriores sint, an qui errorem contrahunt ob cau- 
 tionis defectum ; an qui veritatem repudiant ob ejusdem cautionis 
 excessum. Muratori, de Ingeniorum Moderatione in Religionis- 
 Negotio. Lib. 1, c. 2, p. 14. Edit. 17/9. 
 
 1 Hujus adventui plenum expectationis obsequium pra;be- 
 amus. Nee defendi ante Dominum servi irreligiosa et inverecunda 
 festinatione properemus. S. C^yprianus, de bono Patientia^ p. 220. 
 Edit. Oxon. 
 
 2 Tam solicite, cauteque Veritas investiganda, atque prodenda 
 est, ut Christianae simul Caritatis, ut modestise, ut justitiae maxima 
 ratio habeatur. Quamobrem maledictis, et conviciis perpetuo absti- 
 nendum, calumnite non segnius, quam pestis fugiendae ; hominem 
 graven! ars mimica, virulentai irrisiones, declan)ationesque, minime 
 decent ; in errores vero potius, quam in errantes dimicandum j, 
 tibique, vel quum triumphas de errore deprehenso, exuenda omnis* 
 ambitio. Muratori, in opere supra litato, lib. rir. c 14, p. 577.
 
 33 
 
 you, my Kevereud Brethren, tliat it is our obvious 
 duty to seek diligently the information* -which 
 may qualify us " to give an answer to every 
 man that asketh us a reason of the hope that is 
 in us,"^ and that we have solemnly devoted our- 
 selves to the work of providing our Hocks with 
 the bread of life. But whatever degree of pro- 
 ficiency we may attain in professional studies, 
 may He " who alone worketh great marvels" en- 
 able us all faithfully to preach the Gospel — to 
 teach our people to rest their hopes of salvation 
 on the one foundation, Jesus Christ, to look for 
 the preventing and assisting help of the Holy 
 Spirit, to live in prayer, to ''adorn the doctrine 
 of God our Saviour in all things."^ Al)ove all, 
 may He make us such in our lives, that we may 
 in our measure be able to say to them with the 
 Apostle, " Be ye followers of me, even as I also 
 am of Christ."* 
 
 To you, my l)rethrcn of the laity, I will only 
 say, that we anxiously desire your lovi'. your 
 conticU'iicc. your co-ojx'ratiou. (iod allows you 
 the honour of greatly liclpiiig u^ in oui- work. 
 Without disturljint^ (•cclcsiastical oidci-, all may 
 assist in making known the Ciospcl of Peace. 
 TTonoinable as it is publiel) to |)ror]aim tlie trntli, 
 it is not h'SS excellent to henelit our fellow men 
 
 ' Nod* K, in tin- ,\|»|)<'iiilix. 
 ■J I IVt. III. I.'). •■• Til. II. 10. * I (or. M. I.
 
 34 
 
 ))y our liolinoss aiul oviv prayers.' May avc all 
 prfach ])y our lives ! May the Holy spirit cause 
 the light of faith to burn brightly in us, and may 
 Ave " let our light so shine before men, that they 
 may see our good works, and glorify our Father 
 which is in heaven,"^ and confess that with us at 
 least is fulfilled the Saviour's promise, " Lo, I 
 am with you ahvay, even unto the end of the 
 world." 
 
 ' KjiXov to oia 'Koym u<psX£7v Tolg 'Ssvv&avoiJ.BVovi' iiDii<T<TOv 
 0£, TO o\ apETrii xcci 7rpO(Teux*ii (Tuvipym ai/ToTg • o yap ^la, tovtuv 
 iauTov 7rpo<T(pspci)v tw Oeu, $ov6eT km tu irk'Ka; ^la, tou i^'iou 
 QoYi^YiixaTOi. S. Marcus Eremita, ap. Bibl. PP. Grsecolat. Tom. i. 
 p. 896. A. Edit. 1624. 
 
 2 Mat. V. 16.
 
 APPENDIX 
 
 Note A, p. 19. 
 
 It would be very unreasonable to liope to establish the view 
 here adopted by exiiibiting a nunii)er of extracts from writers of the 
 period. But I cannot forbear taking advantage of the opportunity 
 to introduce a few passages which many excellent persons would 
 little expect to find in writers of the ninth century. " Infer hac 
 omnia caveat fidelis, ne omnino vel in modico in propriis viribus 
 prK'sumat, sed de Dei adjutorio, ut ad finem bonorum pervenire, vol 
 in bono possit opere perdurare : quia Dominus ait : Si/w vie nihil 
 potestin facere. Kt Apostolus ; Dens est (/ui operatur in lobis et 
 telle et jjerficere pro bona voluntate. Et iterum : Ciratiii salvi facli 
 estiis per fidem, ct hocitntier vobis. Kt iterum: A' on quod idonei 
 nimu.s cogitari' nli(juid a nobis ipiasi ex nobis, sed sujficientia nosim 
 ex Deo est. I"]t Dominus : AVwo potest fenire tid wr, nisi Paler, 
 qui misit me, trcuerit eiiw. Midta Dcus facil in homine bona, (jua- 
 non farit homo ; nulla vero facit homo bona, (jua- non Dcus pra-stet 
 ut faciat homo. Suam namque vdhmtatcm homines fariunt, non 
 Dei, (piandt) id aguni quod Deo displicet. Qiiando autom ila faciunt 
 quod voluni ul di\in;i' scrviant \olunlali ; (piamvis volcntcs agani 
 quod agunt, illius taiiien voluntas est a (pio el pra-paralur c>t jultclur 
 qund volunt. Talcs nos annt Dcus, (jualcs fuluri sunuis ipsinn 
 dono, nor. qualcs Mumiis nosiro mcrilo. Sua l»onn Dcus pra-videt, 
 |ir;r^fii, ;idju»a), I'l rcmuncrat in n<il>i-. N'cmn bonus ni^i Hohi"
 
 3() 
 
 Dous, ((111 lion est alterius buiu) bonus. Homines auteni, non pro- 
 prio, sed Dei bono, sunt boni ; qui est fons et oiigo bonltatis ; immo 
 qui est bonitas, a quo oinne bonum, et sine quo nihil boni." S. 
 Agobavdus, (Archbishop of Lyons, 81G— 840,) do Fidei Veritate, 
 0. XIII. Opera, Tom. ii. p. 22, 23. Kdit. Baluz " Subtihter igitur 
 expendat fidelis examinator et pius, quanta fuerit hominis iniquitas, 
 quam nee (|uisquam hominum, net; quilibet angelorum, nisi Dei 
 soUus sanguis valuit expiare. Nee se mereri aliud quam supphcium 
 credat homo, qui post purgationem bai)tismatis, qua etiam parvulis 
 legni coelestis janua aperitur, tametsi qusrdain (Hgua venia suspi- 
 catur se gossisse magis quam novit. JMulta sunt tamen plura, super 
 quibus divini judicii severitatem formidet. Quamquam etiam de 
 bene gestis timendum est, cum tantus vir dicat, omnes justitias 
 noatrae quasi panniis memtruatce. Justitia enim nostra, hcet inter- 
 dum coram liominibus splendeat opere et sermone, in conspectu Dei 
 sordescit prava cDgitatione." Servatus Ijupus ( Abbot of Ferrieres, 
 842 -8G2) de tribus quwst. ap. Sirmondi Opera. Tom. ii. col. 950. A. 
 Edit. Venet. " Nullus tollit peccata, nisi ille de quo dictum est, Ecce 
 Agnus Dei, ecce qui tollit peccata mundi : cui nullum bonum homi- 
 iiis impossibde, nullum malum est insanabile. Quomodo autem 
 Apostolus Petrus ostendit (|ui ait, Non corruptibilibus argenfo vel 
 auro redempti estis de vand vestrd contersat ione paternae traditionis, 
 sed pretioso sanguine quasi ugni incontaminati et immaculati Christi." 
 Florus Magister (Deacon of Lyons, 852.) de Missa. in Bibl. PP. 
 Tom. IV. col. 660. d. Edit. 1575. 
 
 Note B, p. 19. 
 
 The Council of Frankfort, (794,) in its second Canon, (Concil. 
 Labbe, Tom. vii. col. 1057- d.) condemned the second Council of 
 Nice, which in 787 had established the worship of images in the 
 Eastern Church. T!ie Cliurch of England had already taken the 
 same line of conduct. " Anno 792, Carolus rex Francorum misit 
 synodalem librum ad Britanniam, sibi a Constantinopoli directum, in 
 quo libro (heu proh dolor) multa inconvenientia, et verae fidei con- 
 traria reperiebantur ; maxiine, quod pene omnium oiientalium
 
 37 
 
 doctorum nou minus quam trecentoruiu, vel eo aiiipliiis episcoporuin 
 unanima assertione oonfirmatum fuerit, imagines adorari debere, 
 quod omnino ecclesia Dei execratur. Contra quod sciipsit All)inus 
 epistolam ex authoritate divinarum scripturarum mirabiliter affir- 
 matam ; illamque cum eodem libro ex persona Episcoporum, ac 
 principum nostrorum regi Francorum attulit." Rogeri de Hoveden 
 Annal. ap. Scriptores post Bedam. And the Council of Paris, 
 (824,) which also condemned image worship, thus complained of 
 the conduct of the see of Rome : " Maximum voliis in eo obstaculum 
 erat, eo quod pars ilia, quae debebat errata corrigere, suaque aucto- 
 ritate hujusce superstitionis errori obniti, ipsa prorsus eidem super- 
 stitioni, non solum resistere, verum etiam incauta defensione contra 
 auctoritatem divinam et SS. Patrum dicta nitebatur suffiagari." 
 Synod. Paris, ad Ludov. et Lotharium Imp. It is proper to state, 
 that as I have not at present access to tiie collections of Goldastus, 
 (Imperialia Decreta de cultu Imaginum,) or Mansi, (Concil. Tom. 
 XIV.) I liave copied the last extract from Dr. Gieseler. LeI.rbuch der 
 Kirchengeschichte. 2en BandesErsteAbtheilung, s. 80. Bonn, 1831. 
 Agobard, who, according to his editor, the learned and moderate 
 Baluze, only spoke the sentiments which were then universally 
 entertained in France, (Not. ad Lil)rum de Imag.) thus phiinly ex- 
 pressed his opinion: " Quicunque ali(|uam picturam, vel fusilcm 
 sive ductilem adorat statuam, non exhibet cuitum Deo, non honorat 
 angelos, vel homines sanctos, sed simulachra veneratur. Agit hoc 
 nimirum versutus et callidus humani generis inimicus, ut sub pra;- 
 textu honoris sanctorum, rursus idola inlroducat, rursus per divcrsas 
 efligics adoretur; ut avertat nos ab spiritahbiis, ad carnaHa vero 
 demergat ; ac per omnia simus digni ab .Aposlolo audirc : () insrn- 
 sati, ({uis ros fcuscinavil ? — ^ec iterum ad sua laliljuia frauduienla 
 rccurrat astutia, ut dicat se non imagines sanctorum adorare, sed 
 sanctos. Ciumat enim Deus : (lloriain ttwam til/cri iinti i/aho, 7icc 
 laudem meam Kculplilibus. — Si autem aUcpiis homo adoratur, m-I 
 anpehis, pia-lcr enin <)iii et D<mis »•• homo et summi esse consihi 
 angelus, Prupliela testante, pcrliibotiir, non est aliud nomen quod 
 sit \el super hoc nomen (|ut)(l est super omne nomen, nut H'(|uah' 
 ilh. Sc<l quia niilhiM Deo aquah", nullns nlins esflcntiaiitcr Jesus, 
 id est, .'salvator, cxislit, rredamus Apostolo, ccdamus divin.-r 
 ancforiLnli ; (lorfamus gomi in nomine ^nliiis Jcvu, (pirMl (•"( «iqioi
 
 ninuo iionicii ; iic si iilteri liiiiic lioiunciii liil)uiimis, alieiii jmlii'i-- 
 mur a Deo, et liimittiimur secunilum dosidi'iia cmilis iiostri ire 
 ill adinventionibus nostris." Liber dc liiiap;-inibus. Tom. l.j). 2!54, 
 2()7. 
 
 Note C, p. 24. 
 
 Though the remarks heie made have no immediate reference to 
 the present church of Rom(% I cannot forbear quoting the following 
 passage. " Upon this very point (that we acknowledge an honest 
 ignorant Papist may be saved) you and }'our like w^ork upon the 
 advantage of our charity, an:l your own want of it, to abuse the weak. 
 For thus I am told you work upon them. ' You see the Protestants 
 (at least many of them) confess there may be salvation in our 
 church ; we absolutely deny there is salvation in tbeir's : Therefore 
 it is safer to come to our's, than to stay in their's ; to be where 
 almost all grant salvation, than where the greater part of the world 
 deny it,' This argument is very prevailing with men that cannot 
 weigh it, and with women especially, that are put in fear by violent 
 (though causeless) denying heaven unto them. — But though this 
 argument prevails with th ; weak, yet it is much stronger in the 
 cunning, than the true force of it. For all arguments are very 
 moving, that lay their ground upon the adversaries' confession, 
 especially if it be confessed and avouched to be true. But if you 
 W'Ould speak truly, and say, ' Many Protestants indeed confess, 
 there is salvation possi!)le to be attained in the Roman church ; but 
 they say withal, that the errors of that cliurch are so many (and 
 some so great, as weaken the foundation) that it is very hard to go 
 that way to heaven, especially to them that have had the truth mani- 
 fested ;' the heart of this argument were utterly broken." Con- 
 ference with Fi.sher. §. 3.5, p. 185, 186. Edit. 1686. 
 
 Note D, p. 26. 
 *' They are not all faithless that are weak in assenting to the 
 truth, or stiff in maintaining things opposite to the truth of Chris- 
 tian doctrine. Rut as many as hold the foundation which is precious,
 
 :>9 
 
 though they hold it but weakly, and as it were with a slender thread, 
 although they frame many base and unsuitabl-^ things upon it, 
 things that cannot abide the trial of the fire ; yet shall they pass the 
 fiery trial and be saved, which indeed have builded themsehes upon 
 the rock, which is the foundation of the Church. If then our Fathers 
 did not hold the foundation of faith, there is no doubt but they were 
 faithless. If many of them held it, then is therein no impediment, 
 but many of them might be saved." Hooker, Discourse of Justifica- 
 tion. § 14. Works, vol. in. p. 442. Afterwards he goes on to show 
 that they did hold the " foundation." — But even the testimony of 
 Hooker is of less importance for the purpose for which I cite it, than 
 the following very remarkable passage of the great Sa.xon Reformer. 
 Luther thus expresses himself on this very subject in his letter on 
 the opinions of the Anabaptists. Vol. iv. p. .375, of the Altenburg 
 edition of his Works. " Wir bekennen aber, dass unter dem Paps- 
 tumb viel Christliches gutes, ja alles Christlich gut sey, und auch 
 daselbst herkommen sey an uns: Nemlich, wir bekennen, dass ini 
 Pamstumb die rechte heiliche SchrifFt sey, rechte Taufte, recht Sa- 
 crament des Altars, rechte Schliissel zur Vergebung der Siinde, 
 recht Predigampt, rechter Catechisnnis, als zehen Gebot, die Artickel 
 desGlaubens, das Vater unser." Of which the following translation 
 is as literal as I can make it. " We acknowledge however, that 
 under the Papacy there is mmh Christianity, yea ull Christianity, 
 and moreover that the same is thence derived to us : That is to say, 
 we acknowledge, that in the Papacy there is the true Bible, true 
 Baptism, true .Sacrament of the Altar, true keys for the remission of 
 sins, true oflice of preaching, true catechising, for instance tlie Ten 
 Commandinent.s, the Articles of tiie Creed, the I^ord's Prayer." 
 Surely I need no other apology for w hat some perhaps may deem 
 excessive diarifv. 
 
 Note E, p. .'i.'l. 
 
 " D.ita est vobis quu-dam urbs pro|)ria, rives rdigiosi, in (piu »i 
 roncorditer et spiritualiter, Domino pnrstanle, transigitis, cddeslis 
 jam patri.i; pmfiguratione paurlctis. Nojile amnre dcsidiani, (piam 
 Domino i-fignfiscitii ddiomini J'r;r'Kl("i \ribi<i sjnl Siiiii-tJiinni Si ii|i-
 
 >'•. 
 
 10 
 
 turarmii iiistniinentu dugiuatii'a fuai oxpositoiibiis suis, qui veri 
 sunt Horiferi campi, ctrlestis paradisi ponia siuu ia, luidc ct tuleles 
 anima' salubriter imbuantiir, vt lin;;iuc vestrx' non caduco, sed fruc- 
 tifero niniis insJruantur eloquio. Qiiapropter desiderantor introite 
 my>teria Domini, ut sequentlbus iter indicare possitis, quia magna- 
 verccundia- pondus est iiabore quod legas, et ignorare (uiod doceas." 
 Cassiodor. Institut. Divin. Lictionum, c. 32. ap, Bibl. PP. Tom. vi. 
 col. 77. E. Edit. 1575. Never was the admonition of Erasmus 
 more suitable than it is at present. " Videtis jam inverti mundi 
 scenam : aut deponenda est persona, aut agendse sunt sue cuique 
 partes." Colloquia, p. 230. Londini, 1773. 
 
 THE END. 
 
 Bi/ the same Author, 
 
 A LETTER to the Rev. S. R. MAITLAND, on the 
 OPINIONS of the PAULICIxVNS. 8vo. 2.v.
 
 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 ilhli ill 
 
 AA 000 563 999 2
 
 THE folloidng Sermon was preached without the least 
 idea of its publication, which was requested immediately after 
 the service of the Sunday evening on which it was pronounced. 
 It appears as it was delivered, with the exception only of the 
 extract from the Jpjjendix to the Report of the Hibernian 
 Society. The Author requests that his friends and congre^ 
 gation will receive it as a token of his affectionate good zoill. 
 As to the sentiments it contains, they are, it is hoped, derived 
 from the blessed word of God: the fears it expresses result 
 from the invariable testimony of experience upon the subject 
 to which they relate. The whole matter is referred to God, 
 who *' doeth according to his will among the armies of heaven 
 and the inhabitants of the earth," with fervent prayers that 
 his blessing may accompany this effort to advance the glory of 
 his name. 
 
 The Author of this Sermon feels gratified by the rapid sale 
 of the first edition, and the demand ichich is still made for it. 
 This reconciles him completely to its publication. He has 
 added a few notes to explain and to confirm the assertions he 
 has felt it necessary to make. 
 
 Cjmberwell, 
 October 10, 18J2.