of The College of A £ 
 
 V \ UNIVERSITY 
 
 C A L I F O RfcN I A 
 
 LIVE 
 
 PRODUCTION 
 IN CALIFORNIA 
 
 H. T. HARTMANN 
 
 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL 
 Experiment Station 
 Extension Service 
 
 MAI^AL 7 
 
LIVE 
 
 PRODUCTION 
 IN CALIFORNIA 
 
 H. T. HARTMANN 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE 
 Agricultural Experiment Station and Extension Service 
 
THIS MANUAL is one of a series published by the University of California College of Agri- 
 culture and sold for a charge which is based on returning only a portion of the production 
 cost. By this means it is possible to make available publications which, due to relatively high 
 cost of production, or limited audience, would otherwise be beyond the scope of the College 
 publishing program. 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 SECTION 1 1 
 
 The Economic Background ... a short history of olive produc- 
 tion . . . importance of the crop . . . the major varieties. 
 
 SECTION 2 12 
 
 Getting Started . . . choosing a site . . . preparing the land . . . 
 planting and caring for young trees. 
 
 SECTION 3 15 
 
 Propagation, Training, and Pruning . . . information about olive 
 trees that the grower can profitably use. 
 
 SECTION 4 33 
 
 Setting a Satisfactory Crop . . . the effects of controllable and non- 
 controllable influences on fruit set. 
 
 SECTION 5 39 
 
 Production of the Crop . . . the cultural practices that will con- 
 tribute to satisfactory yield through the years. 
 
 SECTION 6 50 
 
 Pests and Diseases . . . how to identify them . . . some recom- 
 mended controls. 
 
Distribution of olive acreage in California. Each dot represents 100 acres. Data from 
 California Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Tulare County leads with 9,019 acres, 
 followed by Butte County with 5,041 acres, and Tehama County with 3,392 acres. 
 
 THE AUTHOR: 
 
 H. T. Hartmann is Assistant Professor of Pomology and Assistant Pomologist in the Experiment 
 Station, Davis. 
 
OLIVE PRODUCTION 
 
 in California 
 
 H. T. HARTMANN 
 
 l.The Economic Background ... a short 
 
 history of olive production . • impor- 
 tance of the crop . • the major varieties. 
 
 
 
 lives are among the important tree 
 fruits produced commercially in Califor- 
 nia. Crop values of olives for a five-year 
 period ending in 1950 held ninth place in 
 the list of California tree fruits — above 
 plums and cherries, but below almonds 
 and apricots. The olive crops showed an 
 average annual valuation of $9,763,000. 
 In bearing acreage, olives ranked tenth 
 in 1950, above apples, plums, and avoca- 
 dos, and just below figs and pears. 
 
 Commercial olive orchards in Califor- 
 nia are located mostly in the Sacramento 
 and San Joaquin valleys. With their rela- 
 tively cold winters and warm summers 
 free of fog, they are more suitable for 
 olive production than the coastal re- 
 gions or southern California. Yields are 
 heavier and more regular, and insect 
 control is less difficult than along the 
 coast. Although many olive plantings 
 were made along the coast in the past, 
 there are few new plantings in this area. 
 However, the olive will grow in all Cali- 
 fornia counties except where winter tem- 
 peratures are low enough to kill the trees. 
 
 How did olive production 
 start in California? 
 
 Commercial olive production is gen- 
 erally found in two belts around the 
 world, one between 30° and 45° N. lati- 
 tude, the other between 30° and 45° S. 
 
 latitude. At higher latitudes the olive can- 
 not be cultivated because of low winter 
 temperatures. Olive trees will not survive 
 temperatures below 10°F. (-12.2°C), 
 most varieties being injured at 15° F. 
 (-9.4°C). Olives will grow vegetatively 
 nearer the equator than 30° N. or S. lati- 
 tude, but with few exceptions are un- 
 fruitful. This is due probably to insuf- 
 ficient winter chilling for proper flower 
 formation. 
 
 There is evidence that olives were first 
 grown on the island of Crete in the Medi- 
 terranean Sea about 3500 B.C., although 
 some historians state that they originally 
 spread from a range in Syria westward 
 along the southern coast of Turkey to- 
 ward Greece. They were not planted in 
 California, however, until 1769, when 
 olive seeds were brought to Mission San 
 Diego from Mexico by Father Junipero 
 Serra and Don Jose de Galvez. 
 
 The variety resulting from this early 
 planting was named the Mission and is, 
 perhaps, a seedling of the Spanish vari- 
 ety, Cornicabra, which it resembles. The 
 Mission today comprises about half of the 
 bearing acreage of olives in California. 
 Other commercial varieties currently 
 grown here were introduced about 1875 
 from Spain and Italy, where they existed 
 as standard pickling varieties. 
 
 Numerous varieties were introduced 
 
 [i] 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 wo a| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 t- CO 
 
 
 
 oqiqcopiqpoqt- 
 
 r| O O H tfi r] O 
 
 IT 
 
 t> 
 
 o o 
 
 
 
 fed© g« 
 
 «> P5 N O H «J 00 r- 
 
 CO O W CO CO rH cs 
 
 
 CN 
 
 c 
 
 d : d 
 
 
 
 <2 o§ 
 
 ft tH 
 
 Cft 00 CO G) CO CO 
 
 T- 
 
 r- 
 
 tH 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 n nh 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 o 
 m 
 
 *-" 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 §5 sg 
 
 J? o b S 
 
 b 3 o ®r 
 
 cd oq to ^ q p to 
 
 (D ^ 00 IO ri 6 IO 
 
 © t- 
 
 • o «o «o Tj< 
 
 ; CO IC9 iH CJ 
 
 
 c 
 
 lO o • o 
 
 -* : d : c 
 
 
 * 
 
 ►— 
 
 ft tH 
 
 co «tf co T-t t- 
 
 t4 
 
 
 I— 
 
 
 
 <N 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 ^-^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3: 
 
 d *" 
 SP* ©g 
 
 oo oj eo ^ n q q 
 
 c- 
 
 CO 
 
 i> in p p 
 
 
 <r 
 
 IC 
 
 iq iq • c 
 
 
 N 00 ri M IO 6 ^ 
 
 CN 
 
 c4 
 
 r-i co tri cc 
 
 
 
 ir: 
 
 rH 
 
 o 
 
 c 
 
 
 O) H 0C 
 
 ) tN CO T* 
 
 C^ 
 
 o 
 
 CO tN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <D 
 
 <:2 oo 
 
 CO © CD 3« 
 
 t-T i-T 
 
 CO 
 
 
 T " 
 
 rH 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 » i-T 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 +> 
 
 *** ' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ° g 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ■^ rH rH rH 
 
 
 (A 
 
 
 (CHN^NNOIM 
 
 t- 
 
 rl © t» OS H r 
 
 CN 
 
 CN 
 
 
 rH O O O O 
 
 
 o 
 
 ^OMoinddi- 
 
 <N 
 
 <n 6 6 d 6 d c 
 
 c 
 
 
 d d d d o 
 
 
 
 M * O 
 
 © h 
 
 CO N H 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 c 
 
 Pk ft 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 w 
 
 0) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 TfoqqqNqiow 
 aJMoiiocodoioc 
 iracocncnoscoTFce 
 
 c^ 
 
 p p tN |p co iq cr 
 d co w i> t-* oo cc 
 
 c 
 
 1- 
 
 IT 
 
 p p iq co o 
 co e4 d d o 
 
 
 3 
 
 IHMH >»** 
 
 Tt 
 
 iH CO CO ^ 
 
 T- 
 
 r- 
 
 
 
 
 O. tH 
 
 CD O CO ** rH CO 
 
 
 iH iH 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ■d 
 
 
 
 
 
 yw ' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 M 
 
 © 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CO 
 
 Q. 
 
 ^?3 
 
 O <N O CO CO O CO 
 
 cc 
 
 c 
 
 O C" 
 
 OJ 
 
 O iH C 
 
 ir. 
 
 
 c 
 
 O O O <tf CC 
 
 
 
 > 
 
 O fc~ ^ ^ t - CJS 'tt* t" 
 
 c^ 
 
 CO -<* 
 
 ^ n d t« 
 
 t> 
 
 
 «* 
 
 lO -^ •* rH 0C 
 ■<* <N ^ CO <M 
 
 y-i 
 
 g 
 
 NH^WHNHr- 
 
 « 
 
 M H N lO IO 05 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 o 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 >> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 "* 
 
 0) 
 
 to 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 © 
 to 
 
 c 
 
 
 
 «o« 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 to 
 
 **s 
 
 (O^Otf 
 
 CO "^ IC 
 
 c 
 
 c 
 
 O <M 
 
 IO O O CN 
 
 CO 
 
 <N 
 
 c 
 
 CO • O rH Tt 
 
 2 
 
 !°» 
 
 CO CO CO e'- 
 
 ■<* 
 
 rH Tt 
 
 cc 
 
 <N 
 
 U3 C^ 
 
 ■^t 
 
 t- CO tJ 
 
 CC 
 
 1- 
 
 IT. 
 
 O • t* 00 CO 
 
 rH 
 
 _fl) 
 
 <J - o. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 03 
 
 0) 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 b 
 
 X 
 
 "2 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •o 
 
 4- 
 
 ft*^ <-l 
 
 en o o c 
 
 Oi tN O O 
 
 t> 
 
 © p CC 
 
 % 
 
 o 
 
 p C5 
 
 a 
 
 (N O C 
 
 p 35 cr 
 
 o 
 
 T* 
 
 8S 
 
 t- CD CS 
 
 CO CO rH 
 
 
 
 h oS d « 
 
 a- 
 
 (N t> 
 
 C5 
 
 (> 
 
 CJ oc 
 
 1- 
 
 i-i CO « 
 
 u: 
 
 c 
 
 tfi 
 
 ^ 
 
 d d c 
 
 o 
 
 in 
 
 0) 
 
 ©°§ 
 
 3 d 
 
 ^C O) w oc 
 
 cc 
 
 oo cr 
 
 "<* r- 
 
 r-T 
 
 CC 
 
 <> 
 
 r- 
 
 00 N t 
 
 c 
 
 c- 
 
 Cn 
 
 
 
 H 00 N « 
 lO" N H r 
 
 > cc 
 
 rH 
 
 <M 
 
 i-t y- 
 
 1- 
 
 
 1— 
 
 H 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 03 
 
 w ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4a 
 
 ^ 
 
 01 to 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 fl 
 
 H- 
 
 0) 4) 
 
 o* do 
 
 O <N O O 
 CM rH O C 
 
 tH 
 IT. 
 
 §§ 
 
 oo 
 
 CO 
 
 
 •^ c 
 
 
 rH O CR 
 
 t- o o 
 
 1- 
 
 c 
 o 
 
 c 
 c 
 
 O <N tN CM CC 
 CO CO <N (N 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 co_ co_ o c 
 
 "tf 
 
 t- IT. 
 
 OS 
 
 
 . © *■ 
 
 
 rH CO w 
 
 > u: 
 
 l« 
 
 __ * 
 
 T^ 
 
 M 
 
 c 
 
 
 
 d oo" d p 
 
 t- lO t- CO 
 i-l rH 
 
 's 
 
 ' ^ CN 
 
 rH r- 
 
 ' 00 
 
 " oc 
 
 * CO~ rt 
 
 " TJ 
 
 " C4" rH~ r- 
 
 1- 
 
 r- 
 
 * 
 
 
 s 
 
 A 
 
 
 XJ--' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •g 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 "O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 V 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 d 
 
 Q. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 "O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 t» 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 
 
 A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 CO 
 
 1. 
 
 (4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 1 
 
 o 
 
 fc 
 
 
 
 
 
 02 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 sa 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 c 
 co 
 
 .1 
 
 o 
 
 £ 
 
 "3 
 
 1 
 
 o 
 
 .1 
 
 1 
 
 Eh 
 
 g 
 
 a 
 
 S 
 
 c 
 
 c 
 
 b 
 
 < 
 
 •c 
 
 1 
 
 V 
 
 A 
 
 
 CO 
 
 "8 1 
 
 1 
 
 p 
 
 hi 
 
 < 
 
 rJ 
 
 •s 
 
 I 
 
 Ph 
 
 el 
 
 t 
 
 < 
 
 o 
 
 s 
 
 a 
 
 4 
 
 32 
 
 si 
 
 wQ 
 * -♦- 
 1 
 
between 1850 and 1900 from the Medi- 
 terranean countries, and much effort was 
 given to testing them, chiefly for oil pro- 
 duction. By 1875 the industry showed 
 promise of becoming important in Cali- 
 fornia agriculture, with about 11,500 
 trees in bearing. In 1910 trees of bearing 
 age numbered 958,000, but the emphasis 
 was shifting from oil to table varieties, 
 with many orchards grafted to the more 
 profitable pickling types. A peak in bear- 
 ing acreage was reached in 1928, but by 
 1950 it had declined from 29,000 to 
 26,826 acres. During the past 4 or 5 years, 
 however, many new olive plantings have 
 been made in California. The nonbearing 
 acreage in 1950 was 4,193 as compared 
 with 620 in 1940. 
 
 The present industry 
 in California 
 
 California produces more than 99 per 
 cent of the olives grown in the United 
 States. Arizona is the only other state 
 having a commercial acreage, with a pro- 
 duction of 100 to 600 tons per year. Olive 
 production in the United States averages 
 about 47,000 tons per year, or almost 1 
 per cent of the total world production. 
 
 The California output of olive oil sup- 
 plied only 14 per cent of the total needs of 
 the United States during the years 1945- 
 50, the remainder being imported, mostly 
 from Spain, Italy, Tunisia, and France. 
 
 Imports of olive oil into the United 
 States are increasing, 10,419,000 gallons 
 having been imported in 1950 — the larg- 
 est amount entering this country in 20 
 years. 
 
 Spanish-green olive production in Cali- 
 fornia accounted for only about 12 per 
 cent of this product consumed in the 
 United States during the years 1945-50, 
 the remainder being imported, mostly 
 from Spain. This type of olive was not 
 processed commercially in California 
 until 1935, and the output has not in- 
 creased since 1940 chiefly because of com- 
 petition from the imported product. 
 
 It is apparent from the data on page 
 
 4 that the olive industry of California 
 is based on the production of canned ripe 
 olives (black-ripe and green-ripe), with 
 the output increasing from 2,300 tons in 
 1919 to 20,400 tons in 1949. 
 
 The production, utilization, and aver- 
 age returns to California olive growers 
 for the postwar years 1945-50 are given 
 on page 6. It may be seen from this 
 table that production of olives for can- 
 ning is usually the most profitable outlet 
 for the grower. During the war years, 
 however, when foreign shipments of olive 
 oil were cut off, the sale of olives for oil 
 manufacture was as profitable as for can- 
 ning. A limited market exists for the ship- 
 ment to eastern cities of fresh, uncured 
 olives that are bought by persons of 
 Mediterranean descent for processing at 
 home. 
 
 The yield per acre for olives varies 
 considerably throughout the state, de- 
 pending upon the district, age of trees, 
 variety, and cultural care. For the 10- 
 year period ending in 1950 the average 
 bearing acreage of all varieties of olives 
 
 Acreage, yields, and returns to growers for 
 California olives from 1922 to 1950. Sharp 
 drop in acreage in 1933 was due to freeze from 
 which trees made a rapid recovery. Data in the 
 graph from Calif. Crop and Livestock Reporting 
 Service. 
 
 [3] 
 
in the state was 24,946, and the average 
 marketable crop was 46,727 tons, giving 
 an average yield per acre for the state of 
 1.87 tons. Heaviest yields are obtained 
 with all varieties in the Tulare County 
 district, with the Manzanillo tending to 
 outyield other commercial varieties in all 
 districts. 
 
 Olive trees generally start bearing in 
 California during the fourth or fifth year 
 and gradually reach full production by 
 the twelfth to twentieth year. It has been 
 the experience of many California olive 
 growers that older trees, 40 to 50 years 
 old, start declining in productivity, espe- 
 
 cially if planted too close together. Close- 
 ness of planting, which affects the ulti- 
 mate size of the tree, is an important fac- 
 tor treated under the section on Establish- 
 ing Your Orchard. 
 
 Marketing your olives 
 
 Processor-canners, of whom there are 
 about 30 in California, handle the mar- 
 keting of olives. Their output is chiefly 
 the canned ripe olive, although most also 
 pack Spanish-green, chopped olives, and 
 other types; some also manufacture olive 
 oil. A few grower-owned cooperatives 
 market a considerable quantity of the 
 
 Comparisons between California production and imports of olive 
 oil, Spanish-green olives, and canned ripe olives. 
 
 
 1930-1940 
 
 1940-1945 
 
 1945-1950 
 
 
 Olive Oil 
 Average annual California 
 
 production 
 
 Average annual U.S. imports 
 Per cent of U.S. consumption 
 of olive oil supplied by 
 California (1945-1950) . . . 
 
 428,000 gal. 
 7,328,000 gal. 
 
 1,200,000 gal. 
 779,000 gal. 
 
 680,000 gal. 
 4,221,000 gal. 
 
 13.9 
 
 Spanish green olives 
 
 Average annual California 
 production 
 
 Average annual U.S. 
 imports 
 
 Per cent of U.S. consump- 
 tion of Spanish-green 
 olives supplied by Cali- 
 fornia (1945-1950) 
 
 588,000 gal. 
 
 (1935-1939) 
 
 6,188,000 gal. 
 
 1,738,000 gal. 
 7,687,000 gal. 
 
 1,251,000 gal. 
 9,437,000 gal. 
 
 11.7 
 
 Canned ripe olives (Black ripe, 
 green ripe) 
 Average annual California 
 production 
 
 Average annual U.S. imports 
 Per cent of U.S. consump- 
 tion of canned ripe olives 
 supplied by California .... 
 
 3,349,000 gal.* 
 
 (9,210 tons) 
 
 none 
 
 5,330,900 gal.* 
 
 (14,660 tons) 
 
 none 
 
 6,878,545 gal.* 
 
 (18,916 tons) 
 
 none 
 
 100 
 
 * A gallon is approximately equal to 5.5 pounds of olives. 
 
 Data from: California Olive Association; Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 678. Production of Spanish-type green 
 olives; Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 370. California olives, Situation and Outlook, 1947. 
 
 [4] 
 
olives produced. About 80 olive-oil plants 
 operate in California, although some do 
 not run every year. Processing olives and 
 olive oil requires considerable capital as 
 well as technical knowledge. 
 
 The California Olive Association, with 
 headquarters in San Francisco, was or- 
 ganized in 1920 to promote the interests 
 of the ripe olive industry, largely through 
 collecting and pooling information. It is 
 a trade association of ripe-olive canners 
 
 but does no marketing of olive products. 
 Under the California Marketing Act of 
 1937 an order was issued entitled, "Mar- 
 keting Order for California Canned 
 Olives and California Green Olives." 
 This was made effective in February, 
 1948. Its principal objectives are: (1) to 
 carry out advertising and sales promotion 
 activities for California canned olives; 
 (2) to establish certain minimum-quality 
 requirements for canned olives and Cali- 
 
 Bearing and nonbearing acreage of olives 
 most important districts as of 
 
 in California in the 
 1950. 
 
 County 
 
 Bearing 
 acreage 
 
 Non-bearing 
 acreage 
 
 Total 
 
 Sacramento valley 
 Butte 
 
 4,473 
 704 
 
 1,813 
 760 
 
 2,839 
 377 
 727 
 
 568 
 
 129 
 
 11 
 
 10 
 
 553 
 
 39 
 
 
 
 5,041 
 
 Glenn 
 
 833 
 
 Sacramento 
 
 1,824 
 
 Shasta 
 
 770 
 
 Tehama 
 
 3,392 
 
 Yolo 
 
 416 
 
 Yuba 
 
 727 
 
 
 
 Total 
 
 11,693 
 
 1,265 
 380 
 344 
 494 
 353 
 
 7,075 
 
 9,911 
 
 1,066 
 
 1,133 
 
 471 
 
 1,062 
 
 1,310 
 
 192 
 
 81 
 
 
 
 150 
 
 85 
 
 1,944 
 
 13,003 
 
 San Joaquin valley 
 Fresno 
 
 1,457 
 
 Kern 
 
 461 
 
 Kings 
 
 344 
 
 Madera 
 
 San Joaquin 
 
 644 
 438 
 
 Tulare 
 
 9,019 
 
 
 
 Total 
 
 2,452 
 
 41 
 
 79 
 
 136 
 
 8 
 
 12,363 
 
 Southern California 
 Los Angeles 
 
 1,107 
 
 Riverside 
 
 San Bernardino 
 
 1,212 
 607 
 
 San Diego 
 
 1,070 
 
 
 
 Total 
 
 All others 
 
 3,732 
 1,490 
 
 264 
 167 
 
 3,996 
 1,657 
 
 
 
 State total 
 
 26,826 
 
 4,193 
 
 31,019 
 
 
 
 Data from California Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. 
 
 [5] 
 

 
 
 • - d 
 
 e> ^ o w o n 
 
 (O t- lO T)i fl) M 
 
 CM 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 © ■£ *-> 
 
 N W H rl H N 
 
 cs 
 
 
 
 •43 
 
 T3 
 
 (► £ 4) 
 
 6* 
 
 69 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 M 
 
 o o o o o © 
 © o o o © o 
 
 CO 
 
 
 o 
 
 o 
 H 
 
 d 
 o 
 
 o o o o o o 
 
 i- 
 
 
 in 
 
 
 H 
 
 d oo d oo » n 
 CO ^ ^ *o CO ^ 
 
 ©5 
 
 
 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 111 
 
 ©■£ n 
 
 OS CO CT> 00 OS © 
 00 O » fj H ^ 
 tN ^ r-i *4 rH lH 
 
 CO 
 
 s 
 
 
 • 
 
 O 
 > 
 
 * 
 
 03 
 
 o 
 
 h 
 
 o 
 
 > © o> 
 
 69- 
 
 69 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 d 
 
 
 
 5 
 
 O 
 
 oi 
 
 © © © © O © 
 
 o o © o o © 
 
 CO 
 00 
 
 1 
 
 o 
 
 
 d 
 o 
 
 » H M N rH <N 
 
 O 
 
 . 5 
 
 
 
 H 
 
 «o «f » d d t-* 
 
 t> 
 
 •a 
 
 "£ 
 
 
 
 r-i 
 
 
 d 
 
 k 
 
 
 
 
 
 cfl 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 "rj" 
 
 M- 
 
 
 
 
 
 9 
 
 23 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 
 © - d 
 
 O « 00 Tj< (35 O 
 ■<* © t> t- t> <N 
 
 3 
 
 O 
 
 CO 
 
 
 j3 
 
 © ■? »* 
 
 CO t)I H H HN 
 
 (N 
 
 
 
 
 oj 
 
 ^s& 
 
 6* 
 
 69 
 
 s 
 
 M- 
 
 <B 
 
 
 
 
 -d 
 
 
 •a 
 
 
 
 
 © 
 
 
 
 
 A 
 
 o 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 
 O. 
 
 o 
 
 £ 
 
 3 
 
 a 
 
 © © o© © © 
 o o © o o o 
 
 CO 
 
 * 
 
 
 ft. 
 0) 
 
 CO 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 o 
 E-» 
 
 H H«D t- tfl N 
 
 ©" 
 
 t 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 d 
 
 
 
 
 
 •3 
 
 If) 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 c 
 
 hi 
 3 
 
 
 ||I 
 
 H CO rl 00 O » 
 HHNH t-O 
 
 § 
 
 w 
 
 
 N N rl H rH 
 
 rH 
 
 (9 
 
 
 
 ft. 
 
 
 0) 
 
 O 
 h 
 
 O 
 
 t> © 4> 
 
 v> 
 
 €0 
 
 01 
 
 44 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 e 
 
 
 o 
 
 W 
 
 u 
 O 
 
 
 o o o o o o 
 
 00 CO § CD D\ C- 
 
 CO 
 
 ft. 
 
 
 CO 
 
 d 
 o 
 
 S 
 
 © 
 
 > 
 
 
 
 
 H 
 
 0> ^ 05 CO C^ CT> 
 
 ua 
 
 
 
 
 H H CO 
 
 rH 
 
 H 
 
 boo 
 
 J. © 
 
 TJ 
 
 
 
 
 
 2 £ 
 
 c 
 
 
 Sag 
 
 si 2 
 
 H O «fi ^ 00 U5 
 
 OIO00CN IOO 
 
 00 
 
 d © 
 csta 
 
 *d 
 
 C4-S 
 
 # 
 
 N 
 
 
 CO ^ tH tN CN CO 
 
 CN 
 
 *8 a 
 
 4) 
 
 2 
 
 > © a) 
 
 69- 
 
 69 
 
 *2 
 
 
 
 
 «■* 
 
 J3 
 
 g 
 
 
 
 
 <2 to 
 
 — I © 
 
 *£ 
 
 
 to 
 
 O O O O O O 
 O O O O O O 
 
 CO 
 
 rH 
 
 3 
 
 
 d 
 
 if) UJ t- IO Tf OJ 
 
 09 
 
 «£: 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 » W.rt 
 
 s 
 
 
 H 
 
 CO t> CO CO O «tf 
 
 « 
 
 «i3 
 
 53 -a 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 rl N H H (N N 
 
 rH 
 
 # 
 
 
 
 
 
 35 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ► * 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^2 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^w 
 
 
 
 ft. 
 
 
 
 
 
 d a 
 11 
 
 a 
 
 
 4) 
 
 
 
 •Ho 
 ^^ 
 
 ©r? 
 
 
 
 O. 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 o 
 
 
 
 !•§ 
 
 
 
 
 IO CS l> CO O) O 
 
 a. 
 
 a 
 
 ■ ? l 
 
 
 
 
 •^ TjH -^ "<* ^ Ifi 
 
 a, 
 
 
 
 
 
 CJS <3> CTS CJ> CT> OS 
 
 > 
 
 
 
 
 
 rH tH rH T-i rH rH 
 
 < 
 
 
 fornia green olives; and (3) to establish 
 certain minimum-size requirements for 
 canned, whole, or pitted olives. 
 
 An Olive Advisory Board of seven olive 
 producers and seven processors was 
 established to make recommendations 
 and assist the Director of Agriculture, 
 California State Department of Agricul- 
 ture, in the administration of the Market- 
 ing Order. 
 
 To carry out the objectives of the Order 
 a compulsory fee not to exceed $12.00 per 
 ton is assessed on all olives received by 
 processors for canning or preservation. 
 One-half this assessment is paid by the 
 processor and one-half by the producer. 
 It is generally believed that the nation- 
 wide advertising campaign carried out 
 under this marketing order has stimu- 
 lated the demand and sale for California 
 ripe olives. 
 
 A second olive Marketing Order en- 
 titled, "Marketing Order for Canned 
 Olive Stabilization," was placed in effect 
 in March, 1952. The principal objectives 
 of this Marketing Order are: (1) to pro- 
 vide reasonable correlation between the 
 supply of canned olives and the consumer 
 demand, and (2) to establish more stable 
 marketing conditions in the canned olive 
 industry. Under this Marketing Order an 
 Olive Stabilization Advisory Board was 
 established consisting of nine members, 
 each a processor of canned olives. 
 
 This marketing order affects the olive 
 grower indirectly, inasmuch as the me- 
 chanics of the order apply only to proces- 
 sors. Should this Marketing Order suc- 
 cessfully attain its stated objectives, how- 
 ever, olive growers will benefit through 
 the increased stability brought to the in- 
 dustry. 
 
 Five varieties are commercially 
 important 
 
 The Mission variety is grown on about 
 52 per cent of the bearing acreage in Cali- 
 fornia (13,846 acres in 1950). Next in 
 order are the Manzanillo, Sevillano, Asco- 
 lano, and Barouni. In nonbearing acres 
 
 [6] 
 
Fruits and pits of the most commonly grown olive varieties in California. Top to bottom: Redding 
 Picholine; Nevadillo; Mission; Manzanillo; Barouni; Ascolano; Sevillano. The sample fru/ts, half- 
 fruits, and pits shown are about nine-tenths actual size. 
 
 [7 
 
in 1950 Manzanillo led with 2,229 acres 
 (or about 53 per cent of the total) fol- 
 lowed by Sevillano, Mission, Ascolano, 
 and Barouni. 
 
 The value per ton of olives increases 
 considerably as the size of the fruit in- 
 creases. Therefore varieties producing 
 large fruits, such as the Sevillano and 
 Ascolano, should be considered in making 
 any new plantings. If these large-fruited 
 varieties were available to processors in 
 considerably greater quantities, however, 
 price differentials between size grades 
 might not be so large. 
 
 In the Tehama County district, Se- 
 villano and, to a lesser extent, Manzanillo 
 are preferred for new plantings and for 
 top-working other varieties. In Butte 
 County, Mission is chiefly grown, the 
 packers in that area favoring this variety. 
 There are small acreages of all the other 
 varieties, with Manzanillo increasing. In 
 Tulare County, Manzanillo is considered 
 the most suitable, with Sevillano and As- 
 colano recommended for more limited 
 plantings. Mission is not advised for new 
 orchards in the Tulare district. 
 
 All the olive varieties grown commer- 
 cially in California are table olives for 
 pickling. No orchards are planted for the 
 express purpose of producing olive oil, 
 as experience has shown that California 
 is unable to produce it as cheaply as the 
 Mediterranean countries. Olive oil pro- 
 duction in California is largely a salvage 
 operation, usually for small, cull, or 
 frozen fruits. 
 
 Each of the five commercial varieties 
 will be treated briefly below. You may 
 find a fuller discussion of varieties in 
 California Agr. Exp. Station Bulletin 720, 
 Olive Varieties in California.* 
 
 Mission. The fruit of this variety is 
 easy to process and its high oil content 
 provides an alternative market for the 
 grower in years when olive-oil prices are 
 satisfactory. Furthermore, this variety is 
 most resistant to cold of any commer- 
 
 * Out of print, but may be obtained in many 
 libraries. 
 
 cial variety grown in California, some old 
 trees surviving temperatures as low as 8° 
 F. in the 1932 freeze. Its disadvantages, 
 however, tend to outweigh its advantages. 
 The fruit is relatively small, with the low- 
 est flesh-pit ratio of any commercial vari- 
 ety. Since the demand is for the larger 
 fruits, this must be met with other vari- 
 eties. Missions of "Mammoth" or larger 
 size are rare. The fruit matures for 
 pickling rather late in the season, during 
 late October or November, when there is 
 danger of freezing injury. If this occurs, 
 the fruit shrivels and is no longer suit- 
 able for pickling but is useful only for 
 oil extraction. 
 
 This variety tends toward alternate- 
 bearing, in which a large crop of small 
 fruit is produced during the "on" year 
 and a small crop of relatively large fruit 
 in the "off" year. Some Mission orchards, 
 however, especially in the Butte County 
 section, bear quite regularly and have 
 been profitable. Mission trees tend to 
 grow tall and unless kept pruned become 
 difficult to harvest. While resistant to 
 attacks of olive knot, Mission is quite 
 susceptible to infections of peacock spot. 
 It is believed that there are several dis- 
 tinct strains of Mission. 
 
 Manzanillo. According to data of the 
 California Livestock and Crop Reporting 
 Service, this is consistently the highest- 
 yielding of the four leading commercial 
 varieties, averaging about 75 per cent 
 higher than Mission. The trees are rela- 
 tively low and spreading and easy to har- 
 vest. Fruits of this variety process easily, 
 are generally larger than those of the 
 Mission, and have a much higher flesh- 
 pit ratio. The oil content is sufficiently 
 high to justify use of the crop for oil ex- 
 traction, if this becomes necessary. Bear- 
 ing is fairly regular, not fluctuating in 
 yield as much as some of the other vari- 
 eties. The fruit matures early enough so 
 that it is rarely injured by early frosts, 
 but trees of this variety are considered to 
 be quite susceptible to low-temperature 
 injury. Manzanillo is not likely to be- 
 
 [81 
 
n bo 
 M O 5 * 
 
 © o » © 
 
 u 
 
 *E 
 
 V. 
 
 
 
 "5 
 u 
 
 c 
 
 
 
 > 
 # > 
 
 "o 
 
 o 
 
 X 
 
 *• 
 
 c 
 o 
 
 4) 
 
 (A 
 
 c 
 o 
 
 "Z 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 E 
 
 o 
 
 v 
 
 £ 
 
 o 
 
 Q ° 
 
 II 
 
 CM ° 
 
 o'S, 
 
 V u c$ 
 
 O 1- 45 05 
 
 *3 to 
 0. ? 
 
 © 05 ._ 
 
 §>.B.a2 
 2 to w ho 
 
 11-1 
 
 
 00 
 
 rH o 
 lO ~ (N 
 
 t- 25 - 
 
 £ 5 
 
 42 
 
 <N o 
 
 - g a> 
 
 *> S3 b 
 
 a a> d 
 
 pq H H 
 
 t- 
 
 - g O) 
 
 ® oS *2 
 
 £ ,2 ^ 
 
 M H H 
 
 o 
 o 
 o *. 
 
 a3 O 
 « ft 
 
 I 1 
 
 o & 
 
 o S 
 
 ® ►». 0) 
 
 O i fl 
 
 4J (« fa 
 
 « <D S 
 
 05 C £ 
 
 CQ dj 
 
 31 
 
 _L «* 
 
 S O 
 
 CD 
 
 a 
 
 £■&£ 
 a bo 
 
 3 C 
 (D 8 J 
 
 | § * I 1 
 
 MOOmO 
 
 is is 
 
 M O ot O 
 
 
 05 
 
 £ £ £ 
 
 P5Cfc 
 
 S 00 
 
come severely infected with the peacock 
 spot disease, but it is much more suscepti- 
 ble to olive knot than Mission, and young 
 trees or new grafts have become heavily 
 infected with this disease, especially in the 
 Butte County area. 
 
 Sevillano. The chief advantage of the 
 Sevillano is its large-sized fruit, for which 
 a considerable premium is paid. It also 
 ranks next to Manzanillo in yields per 
 acre, and the flesh-pit ratio is above both 
 Mission and Barouni. The oil content is 
 not high enough to justify oil extraction 
 in most years. Fruit is usually harvested 
 before danger of early frosts. Because the 
 trees are not upright-growing like the 
 Mission, the fruits are easy to pick. Most 
 packers consider the fruits of this vari- 
 ety more difficult to process and the qual- 
 ity somewhat lower than either Mission or 
 Manzanillo, although with proper treat- 
 ment a very satisfactory product can be 
 obtained. Trees are quite susceptible to 
 olive knot but resistant to peacock spot. 
 
 This variety is susceptible to three physio- 
 logical diseases called "shotberries," 
 "split-pits," and "soft-nose." They are 
 discussed on page 55 et seq. 
 
 Ascolano. Since these fruits are quite 
 tender at maturity, extra care must be 
 taken to avoid bruising during harvest 
 and processing. This is probably why 
 Ascolano is not more widely planted. In 
 addition, yields are usually rather low 
 compared to other varieties. The fruit is 
 almost as large as Sevillano and has a 
 high flesh-pit ratio (8.2:1), which, with 
 its good quality, makes this a fine table 
 olive. Although canned ripe olives of this 
 variety are generally considered excel- 
 lent, they are not suited to Spanish-green 
 pickling because of "salt shrivel" during 
 fermentation. Although its oil content is 
 almost as high as Manzanillo, the fruit is 
 not often used for oil extraction. Its fruits 
 mature earlier than any other commercial 
 variety, usually in late September, so that 
 frost damage is not a problem. Trees are 
 
 4.0 
 
 MANZANILLO 
 
 '^'''•—A SCO LA NO \ 
 
 V 
 
 1940 
 
 41 
 
 42 
 
 43 
 
 44 
 
 45 
 
 46 
 
 Fluctuation of yields of olives by variety, 1940 to 1946. Yields between varieties cannot be com- 
 pared, as different varieties are grown largely in different parts of the state. 
 
 [10] 
 
0) 
 
 o 
 
 (A 
 
 0) 
 
 o 
 
 u 
 O) 
 
 o 
 
 # N 
 
 In 
 
 0> M 
 
 t» ft 
 <! 
 
 05 CD to n 
 ^^1 
 
 2P*S p. 
 
 CO 
 
 o o o o io m 
 
 M t» O) (N M H 
 W «tf CO CO i-4 i-\ 
 
 o'lONOJOOMMOOti 
 <N i-H tH i-l i-H 
 
 o o o o io io 
 
 M t- Oi (M M H 
 
 lO tH CO « H H 
 6©- 
 
 :3 
 
 ® • « h 
 
 CD -t- 
 
 2.2-8 
 > ft CD 1 
 
 <! p. 
 
 Hffloq05t- f N^WO^ 
 l>OCOCO«OCOCOC>Ot> 
 
 o w o o w 
 
 H t- -* OS t* 
 CO N N H 
 
 5 » W M 
 
 q o q q o» ri eg io h h 
 6 d 6 6 t?i i^ i>* h n oi 
 
 H N N tN 
 
 CD -f- 
 
 ^®5 
 
 So.3 w o 
 
 glss 
 
 » » W H 
 
 13 
 
 CO b CO rt 
 
 » h£ ft 
 
 t- ^ OJ t- 
 CO CO tN N rl 
 
 qoqio^o>eooqo5H 
 6 d 6 n od t> n «d ^ t»' 
 
 i-H (N r-l i-H rH 
 
 O N 00 CO If) 
 t> 00 fl> H CO 
 
 ■a e 
 
 ||1 1 
 
 3 © 
 
 W O 
 
 3 
 
 ^3Sh w ^ 
 
 T3 co 
 02 02 
 
 S.S5 
 
 2! en ft 
 
 ss -c 
 
 CO . CD 
 
 3! °o 9 
 a^ c 
 
 »-l<JS eS 
 co^ 3 
 
 >» CD^ 
 CD >>"3 
 J CD M 
 
 «3 " 
 
 fl d • 
 
 lis 
 
 S 2 2 
 £ s 2 
 
 <o ** 
 
 CD CO CD 
 CDS ° 
 
 ftO+* 
 tf .25 
 
 &ls 
 
 -d*J g 
 
 .2-3 & 
 
 JO CD 
 
 4HCM 61 
 
 oo'S 
 
 j85 a 
 
 eel e« 3 
 
 ill 
 
relatively easy to harvest and are fairly 
 resistant to peacock spot and olive knot. 
 Barouni. The fruits of this variety are 
 considered somewhat difficult to process, 
 and the resulting product not as high in 
 quality as some of the other varieties. 
 Fruit is of good size, almost as large as 
 Ascolano, but the flesh-pit ratio is rela- 
 tively low (6.8:1). A considerable por- 
 tion of the crop (500 to 700 tons) is ship- 
 ped fresh each year to eastern cities for 
 home processing. In the north part of the 
 state, Barouni consistently bears very 
 good crops, but in southern California it 
 is reported to be a shy bearer. This vari- 
 ety, the last to be planted in commercial 
 acreages in the state, was introduced in 
 1905 from Tunisia by the U.S.D.A. Divi- 
 sion of Plant Exploration and Introduc- 
 tion. It was widely planted throughout the 
 state in 1920 to 1925, particularly in Butte 
 County. Very few new plantings are now 
 being made. Fruits mature for pickling 
 about the same time as Manzanillo, dur- 
 ing October or early November. The trees 
 are somewhat spreading and are easy to 
 harvest. Barouni is more susceptible to 
 olive knot than Mission, and in the 1932 
 freeze showed greater tree injury. 
 
 Other varieties. A number of vari- 
 eties — mostly remnants of variety intro- 
 ductions from the early days of the in- 
 dustry — are found in scattered locations 
 throughout California. Strictly oil olives, 
 such as the Nevadillo, Redding Picholine, 
 Rubra, Pendulina, and Chemlali, are gen- 
 erally top-worked to large-fruited vari- 
 eties. Pickling varieties include Amellau, 
 Cucco, Lucques, Macrocarpa, Obliza, 
 Polymorpha, Rouget, St. Agostino, and 
 Santa Catarina. Some of these are still 
 being tested for possible commercial 
 value. 
 
 New introductions. Since 1900 the 
 U.S.D.A. Division of Plant Introduction 
 and Exploration has imported some 50 
 olive varieties from all parts of the world. 
 In addition, since 1946 the Department of 
 Pomology of the University of California 
 has imported about 50 varieties, princi- 
 pally from the Mediterranean region. 
 They are all growing and being tested at 
 the University's Wolfskill Experimental 
 Orchards at Winters, California. 
 
 An olive-breeding program by the Uni- 
 versity of California for the possible 
 development of improved varieties is now 
 in progress. 
 
 2. Getting Started . • . choosing a site . . 
 
 preparing the land . • . planting and 
 caring for young trees. 
 
 Choose the right location 
 for your orchard 
 
 Climate. It is probable that the climate 
 throughout the San Joaquin and Sacra- 
 mento valleys of California is suitable for 
 satisfactory yields of olives, with the pos- 
 sible exception of the delta area, where 
 some partial coastal-weather influence is 
 present. In the lower foothills of the 
 Sierra Nevadas, such as the Butte County 
 olive district, satisfactory yields can also 
 be expected. 
 
 While there have been profitable olive 
 orchards south of the Tehachapi Moun- 
 
 tains in southern California, it is some- 
 what difficult to obtain there the yields 
 possible in the Sacramento-San Joaquin 
 valleys. New commercial plantings are 
 not recommended for the southern area, 
 nor for the coastal regions, where low 
 yields and difficult control of black scale 
 have been experienced. Avoid areas 
 where early frosts are probable, as the 
 harvesting of most varieties continues 
 through October and November. Frozen 
 fruits, as explained in Section 5 of this 
 manual, shrivel and cannot be used for 
 pickling. 
 
 [12 
 
Water supply. Few, if any, commer- 
 cial olive orchards are grown in Califor- 
 nia without provision for irrigation, al- 
 though olive trees will live and bear some 
 fruit with only the normal rainfall. The 
 benefits of irrigation are found in larger 
 trees with heavier crops, and larger and 
 non-shrivelled fruits. 
 
 Soil. Olives grow satisfactorily on a 
 wide variety of soil types, from the deep, 
 fertile soils of the central valley to the 
 rocky, shallow soils of the foothills. It is 
 important, however, that olives be 
 planted only on well-drained soils free 
 from alkali. 
 
 Transportation and marketing 
 facilities. The olive grower's immediate 
 market is one of the processors. They are 
 located chiefly in the main olive-produc- 
 ing areas around Corning, Oroville, and 
 Lindsay — in Tehama, Butte, and Tulare 
 counties, respectively — although some 
 are found in other parts of the state. Un- 
 processed olives can be hauled by motor 
 truck for considerable distances, and 
 orchards do not necessarily have to be 
 located close to the processing centers. 
 
 To establish your orchard 
 
 You must usually grade or level the 
 land before installing an irrigation 
 system. 
 
 Grading and leveling. This is highly 
 important as a preliminary step to install- 
 ing some types of irrigation systems, to 
 facilitate the proper distribution of water. 
 If subsoiling appears desirable with hard- 
 pan soils, it should be done before the 
 trees are planted. If sprinkler irrigation 
 is to be used, little, if any, leveling may 
 be necessary. 
 
 Installing the irrigation system. 
 Plan and install this before planting your 
 orchard. The most common systems are 
 the square basin, the check, the contour 
 check, and the furrow. However, the 
 sprinkler system of irrigation coming into 
 widespread use in olive orchards is prov- 
 ing very satisfactory. Because it elimi- 
 nated the need for land leveling it is espe- 
 
 cially valuable in the rolling foothill sec- 
 tions where leveling is impossible and the 
 usual furrow system leads to erosion. 
 Sprinkling also generally results in bet- 
 ter soil-moisture distribution and soil 
 utilization by the roots, especially where 
 the depth of the soil is limited, or in sandy 
 soils where water penetration is very 
 rapid. The first year or two after planting, 
 it is practical to haul water to small basins 
 around the young trees by tank wagons 
 rather than to use the irrigation system. 
 You can find a full discussion of this sub- 
 ject in California Agr. Ext. Cir. 362, 
 Farm Irrigation Structures * and Califor- 
 nia Agr. Ext. Cir. 388, Sprinkling for Irri- 
 gation. 
 
 Laying out the orchard. Most olive 
 orchards in California are planted by 
 the square system. A satisfactory plant- 
 ing distance would be 35 x 35 or — in 
 Tulare County especially — 40 x 40 feet. 
 Some California olive orchards have been 
 planted with a 20 x 20 foot spacing, which 
 has proved far too close. With close plant- 
 ing, yields start declining soon after the 
 trees come into full bearing because of 
 shading out the bearing areas on the sides 
 of the trees and also because of root com- 
 petition. 
 
 Planting the trees. Nursery stock 
 may be obtained growing in gallon cans 
 or bare-rooted. In the latter case the 
 leaves should be removed and the tree cut 
 back to one trunk without branches. The 
 roots should be kept covered and moist at 
 all times. Set out young trees during 
 December, January, or February, but 
 only during times when the soil is not too 
 wet to work. In heavy adobe soils it may 
 be best to delay planting until February. 
 Trees can be kept heeled-in in trenches 
 until the soil is dry enough to handle 
 properly. In planting, the holes need be 
 only large enough to accommodate the 
 roots in their natural position. Extra- 
 long roots can be pruned back, and 
 broken and torn ones cut off. Set the trees 
 
 * This publication is currently out of print, 
 but may be consulted in many libraries. 
 
 [13] 
 
Trees above were set 22 x 22 feet apart. Yields are low, as all the lower fruiting wood has died 
 out because of lack of light. Harvesting and pest control are difficult. 
 
 TREE SPACING IS IMPORTANT 
 
 Planted 40 x 40, trees below are well-shaped and heavy-bearing. Fruit-bearing surfaces reach 
 almost to the ground and are easily harvested and kept free from pests. 
 
 [14 
 
at the same depth to which they grew in 
 the nursery. It is important to firm the 
 soil around the roots as the hole is filled 
 in and to soak the soil thoroughly around 
 the newly planted tree. If spring rains 
 do not occur, further frequent irrigations 
 will be necessary. 
 
 It is advisable to whitewash the trees 
 after planting to prevent sunburning of 
 the trunk. A satisfactory whitewash may 
 be made as follows : quicklime, 5 lb. ; salt, 
 % lb.; sulfur, % lb. Add the salt and sul- 
 fur while the lime is slaking. Age the 
 whitewash several days before using and 
 dilute to a thick consistency so that it can 
 be easily applied with a brush. Although 
 more expensive, a white cold-water paint 
 is a satisfactory substitute for whitewash 
 and will last two to four times as long as 
 the cheaper product. 
 
 Care of the young trees. Keep them 
 growing vigorously with proper weed 
 control and ample irrigation in order to 
 bring them into bearing as soon as possi- 
 ble. Ordinarily nitrogen fertilizers are not 
 necessary until after the trees come into 
 bearing unless the soil is particularly 
 deficient in nitrogen. 
 
 Intercrops can be profitably used the 
 first few years after planting, provided 
 they do not interfere with the growth of 
 the trees. Certain deciduous fruits, such 
 as plums, peaches, and pomegranates 
 have been used successfully as intercrops 
 with olives, 4 or 5 crops being harvested 
 before they were pulled out. Cotton, 
 tomatoes, and most vegetables should be 
 avoided. They tend to spread the fungus 
 disease, Verticillium, which is becoming 
 a serious problem with California olives. 
 
 3. Propagation, Training, and Pruning . • . 
 
 information about olive trees that the 
 grower can profitably use. 
 
 Botany of the olive 
 
 The olive is a broad-leaved evergreen 
 tree capable of living more than a thou- 
 sand years. The wood is very resistant to 
 decay, and if the top dies a new trunk will 
 arise from the roots. Trees are quite shal- 
 low-rooted even on deep soils. The thick, 
 leathery leaves will adhere to the tree for 
 2 to 3 years, dropping mostly in spring. 
 
 Cultivated varieties of the olive of com- 
 merce belong to the species, Olea euro- 
 paea L. of the genus Olea. About 30 spe- 
 cies of this genus are found in the tropical 
 and subtropical areas of the world, but 
 other than Olea europaea L. none of them 
 produces edible fruit. The genus Olea is 
 a member of the family, Oleaceae, which 
 also contains the following well-known 
 genera: Fraxinus (ash) , Syringa (lilac), 
 Ligustrum (privet), Forsythia (Golden 
 Bell), Jasminium (the jasmines), and 
 Forestiera (Forestiera neomexicana — the 
 California "wild olive") . The varieties of 
 
 Olea europaea L. can be grafted success- 
 fully on most of the above genera. 
 
 Flowers of Olea europaea L. are borne 
 on a paniculate inflorescence arising in 
 the axil of each of the oppositely arranged 
 leaves. They are usually produced on 
 branches formed the previous season, 
 but may arise from dormant buds one 
 or two years old. The flowers are small 
 and yellowish-white, with a short, 4- 
 toothed calyx, and a short-tubed corolla 
 with four lobes. There are two stamens 
 and a 2-loculed ovary, bearing a short 
 style and capitate stigma. 
 
 The flowers are of two types: (1) per- 
 fect, containing both stamens and pistil; 
 and (2) staminate, containing only sta- 
 mens, the pistils being abortive and non- 
 functioning. The relative proportion of 
 perfect and staminate flowers varies with 
 varieties. No purely pistillate flowers 
 occur. In the perfect flower the pistil is 
 large, almost filling the entire space with- 
 
 [15] 
 
A*'- S;i'-ir:> 
 
 •\«f2P8fes l ><> 
 
 Top— Enlarged views of olive flowers at full bloom: A, staminate (male) flower; B, perfect (male 
 and female) flower; P, pistil. Center— Photomicrographs of olive pistils (female part that develops 
 into fruit) shortly before bloom; C, aborted pistil in staminate flower; D, developed pistil in perfect 
 flower. Bottom— Inflorescences (flower clusters) shortly before and during bloom. (A and B after 
 Brooks.) 
 
 [16] 
 
in the floral tube. Its color is a light green 
 in the bud, becoming a deep green at 
 full bloom. In the staminate flower, the 
 pistil is rudimentary, barely raised above 
 the floor of the floral tube, while the style 
 is small and either brown, greenish-white, 
 or white. The stigma is not large and plu- 
 mose as it is with functioning pistils. 
 Occasionally, pistils reach an almost nor- 
 mal size before aborting. The reason for 
 the abortion of the pistil in staminate 
 flowers is not known, but it is possibly 
 some nutritive or hormone relationship. 
 
 The normal pistil in the olive flower 
 has two carpels originally, each contain- 
 ing two mature normal ovules capable of 
 fertilization and development. However, 
 in the subsequent fruit only one carpel is 
 found, usually having only one seed. 
 
 The olive fruit is considered a drupe 
 (like the peach, apricot, and plum). It 
 consists entirely of carpel tissue, the wall 
 of the ovary having both fleshy and dry 
 portions, the skin being the exocarp, the 
 flesh the mesocarp, and the stone or pit, 
 the endocarp. The seed is within the endo- 
 carp. 
 
 The mature seed is made up of a thin 
 seed coat, enclosing the starch-filled endo- 
 sperm, which surrounds the tapering, 
 flat, leaflike cotyledons and short radicle 
 (root) and plumule (stem). 
 
 The first evidence of flower formation 
 in olive buds is found about 8 weeks be- 
 fore bloom, with a subsequent rapid de- 
 velopment of floral parts. Full bloom in 
 California occurs from about May 1 to 
 June 1, depending upon the variety, sea- 
 son, and location. The blooming period 
 is generally one to two weeks earlier in the 
 southern than in the northern sections. 
 
 Propagation 
 
 The olive, like other fruit species, fails 
 to produce the true variety from seed, 
 hence must be propagated by budding or 
 grafting the desired variety onto seed- 
 lings, or by some other vegetative method 
 such as cuttings or suckers. A full dis- 
 cussion of propagation will be found in 
 
 California Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 96, Propa- 
 gation of Fruit Plants. 
 
 Nursery stock. Of the methods for 
 starting olive trees used in olive-produc- 
 ing countries, the first three in the list 
 below are the most important. 
 
 1) Grafting or budding seedlings in the 
 nursery or volunteer trees in orchards 
 or forests. 
 
 2 ) Removing suckers from the base of old 
 trees and starting them in the nursery 
 or orchard. 
 
 3) Making cuttings of wood several years 
 old, 1 to 3 inches in diameter. 
 
 4) Making cuttings of year-old growth 
 with leaves attached. 
 
 5) Removing and planting knobby-type 
 growth (ovuli) from trunk and roots of 
 old trees. 
 
 6) Layering suckers from old trees by 
 mounding soil around the base of trees. 
 
 7) Planting truncheons (large pieces of 
 wood horizontally just under the soil) . 
 
 8) Layering the shoots arising from trun- 
 cheons. 
 
 9) Bench-grafting (whip-grafting of 
 scions onto whole or piece roots). 
 
 All the above methods have been used 
 to some extent in California, but the most 
 satisfactory are : propagation by cuttings, 
 both hardwood and softwood, use of de- 
 tached suckers from old trees, and graft- 
 ing or budding onto seedlings. 
 
 Propagation by hardwood cut- 
 tings. If properly done this is probably 
 the best method, as it requires no special 
 equipment. It has the disadvantage of 
 using relatively large branches ; therefore 
 if you want a considerable quantity of 
 cuttings it involves removal of much fruit- 
 ing wood from trees. If you can find an 
 orchard that is being pruned heavily, you 
 can use pruning wood gathering imme- 
 diately after cutting. 
 
 Take care in all types of propagation 
 not to use wood infected with Olive Knot, 
 or the new trees will have this disease. 
 Do not try to start Sevillano trees from 
 cuttings, as they root with difficulty. The 
 use of hormones is beneficial. The figure 
 
 [17] 
 
\ 
 
 i 
 
 Mission olive nursery stock after 2 years in nursery propagated in 3 ways: left— suckers with piece 
 of old root attached; center— hardwood cuttings; right— softwood cuttings. 
 
 on page 20 shows trees propagated by 
 
 this method after one year in the nursery. 
 
 Directions, Prepare cuttings in late 
 
 January or early February from wood 3 
 
 One-year-old cuttings: left, no treatment; 
 right, soaked 24 hours in indoleacetic acid and 
 callused in moist sawdust 30 days at 65° F. 
 
 to 4 years old, and from 1 to 3 inches in 
 diameter. Cut into 1-foot lengths and re- 
 move all leaves. 
 
 Soak the basal few inches of the cut- 
 tings for 24 hours in a fresh solution of 
 indoleacetic acid or indolebutyric acid at 
 a strength of about 13 p. p.m. (% gram 
 in 1 gallon water).* Dissolve the chemi- 
 cal in a small amount of alcohol before 
 adding to the water. 
 
 Bury the cuttings in moist (not wet) 
 sawdust for about 30 days for callusing, 
 preferably in a building where the tem- 
 perature will be from 60° to 70°F. The 
 callusing treatment is essential for this 
 method. Hormone treatments without cal- 
 lusing are of no value. 
 
 After callusing, it has been recom- 
 mended that the cuttings be soaked in a 
 Vitamin B x solution for another 24 hours 
 before planting. Results of tests conducted 
 by the California Agricultural Experi- 
 ment Station showed no benefit from this. 
 
 Plant cuttings in a well-prepared nurs- 
 ery soil, with about % of the cutting 
 above ground. Frequent irrigations dur- 
 ing the summer are essential. 
 
 * Most druggists will weigh these small 
 amounts. 
 
 [18] 
 
Indoleacetic acid and indolebutyric 
 acid, referred to on this page and else- 
 where, are available from the Eastman 
 Kodak Co., Organic Chemicals Division, 
 Rochester 4, N.Y.; or from Thompson 
 Horticultural Chemicals Co., 3600 Monon 
 St., Los Angeles 27, Calif. 
 
 Propagation by softwood cut- 
 tings. With this method many cuttings 
 can be prepared without the removal of 
 an excessive amount of fruiting wood 
 from trees. It has the disadvantage of 
 requiring glass-covered beds or green- 
 house facilities and, preferably, provision 
 for maintaining bottom heat. While the 
 cuttings of most varieties will root even- 
 tually without any hormone treatment, 
 the response is so marked that it is well 
 worth while to use it. This type of cut- 
 ting, even after having rooted, must be 
 handled under almost greenhouse condi- 
 
 tions, or the losses will be heavy. How- 
 ever, if cuttings are properly hardened off 
 they can be lined out in the nursery row. 
 Some nurserymen prefer to transplant 
 rooted cuttings into gallon cans and grow 
 them in the cans until they are large 
 enough to plant in the orchard. Rooted 
 softwood cuttings are shown on page 20. 
 
 Directions. Take cutting wood in Sep- 
 tember from wood of the previous sum- 
 mer's growth, using fairly vigorous water- 
 sprout type of wood. If greenhouse facili- 
 ties are not available, the cuttings should 
 be started soon enough so that they will 
 be rooted before cold weather. 
 
 Prepare the cuttings as indicated 
 above, avoiding the use of the succu- 
 lent terminal portions of the shoots. They 
 should be about 4 or 5 inches long, with 
 the basal cut just below a node. Retain 
 two leaves at the top of the cutting. Keep 
 cutting-wood and cuttings damp at all 
 times. 
 
 Dip the basal ends of the cuttings for 
 
 The use of hormones, callusing treatment, and Vitamin B* in the 
 
 propagation of olives by hardwood cuttings. Cuttings started in 
 
 nursery on April 6, 1951. Mission variety, Davis, California. 
 
 Treatment 
 
 Per cent 
 
 of cuttings 
 
 rooted 
 
 Av. no. of 
 
 roots 
 per cutting 
 
 Av. shoot 
 
 length 
 per cutting 
 
 Check (no treatment) 
 
 
 
 
 
 cm. 
 4 
 
 
 Callused in moist sawdust for 30 days 
 
 15 
 
 2 
 
 30 
 
 Callused in moist sawdust for 30 days. Soaked in hor- 
 mone for 24 hours before callusing and Vitamin B , 
 for 24 hours after callusing. 
 1 Indoleacetic acid (13 p.p.m.f) 
 
 Indolebutyric acid (13 p.p.m.) 
 
 Water check 
 
 50 
 95 
 35 
 
 8 
 22 
 
 4 
 
 52 
 
 124 
 
 70 
 
 
 Callused in moist sawdust for 30 days. Soaked in hor- 
 mone for 24 hours before callusing but not in Vitamin 
 
 Indoleacetic acid (13 p.p.m.) 
 
 Water check 
 
 65 
 50 
 
 13 
 
 4 
 
 131 
 32 
 
 
 * Several Vitamin Bi preparations are available' for use on plants. The one used in this test was "Vita- 
 Flor," containing 0.1 per cent thiamin chloride, used at 8 drops per gallon. 
 t Parts per million. 
 
 [19] 
 
Softwood cuttings after 7 weeks in the rooting medium: left to right, dipped for 1 second in 
 indolebutyric acid at 4,000 p. p.m.; leaves retained but not treated; leaves removed but treated 
 with IBA; leaves removed and not treated. 
 
 1 second in a 50 per cent alcohol solu- 
 tion of indolebutyric acid (see above) 
 at about 4,000 p.p.m. (Add an equal 
 amount of water to 95 per cent alcohol to 
 obtain approximately a 50 per cent alco- 
 hol solution. Dissolve % gram of indole- 
 butyric acid in % pint of the 50 per cent 
 alcohol solution. This will be enough to 
 treat several thousand cuttings. Rubbing 
 alcohol may be used.) 
 
 Place the cuttings in beds of clean sand, 
 or sand and peat moss, or sand and coarse 
 (insulation grade) vermiculite, or coarse 
 vermiculite alone. Keep the cuttings cov- 
 ered with glass at all times and water them 
 frequently, but not excessively, to main- 
 tain a high humidity. Protect them from 
 the full sun. Some provision for bottom 
 heat under the cuttings, such as electric 
 soil cables or a one- or two-foot layer of 
 fresh manure, is desirable but not 
 essential. 
 
 The cuttings will usually root in 10 
 to 15 weeks, when you can remove them 
 and transfer them to pots or gallon cans. 
 Keep them under conditions of high hu- 
 midity for a time after this to prevent 
 
 losses. After being well-established in 
 the soil, they can be moved to the nurs- 
 ery or, if in gallon cans, left until large 
 enough to set out in the orchard. 
 
 Propagation by the use of de- 
 tached suckers. This very simple 
 method of starting new trees is highly 
 successful, requiring no special equip- 
 ment. The suckers are'sometimes planted 
 directly in the orchard, but it is prefer- 
 able to grow them a year in the nursery. 
 All that is necessary is a source of large 
 trees which produce an abundance of 
 suckers from the base. One disadvantage 
 of this method is that the suckers may be 
 of an unknown or an unwanted variety, 
 in which case they must later be budded 
 or grafted to the variety desired. 
 
 Directions. In February remove the 
 suckers from the old tree, using an ax 
 or sharpened heavy shovel to take a piece 
 of the old root with the sucker. Cut back 
 to about 18 inches and remove all leaves. 
 Plant immediately in the nursery with the 
 root piece about 6 inches deep. Irrigate 
 when necessary through the summer. 
 After one year in the nursery, trees are 
 
 [20] 
 
usually large enough to set out in the 
 orchard. 
 
 Propagation by grafting or bud- 
 ding seedlings. There are some claims 
 that olive trees on seedling roots are 
 longer-lived and less likely to blow over 
 in heavy winds than trees started from 
 cuttings. However, no experimental evi- 
 dence exists to support this belief. In 
 California very fine orchards have been 
 propagated by both methods. Starting 
 trees from seedlings is generally slower 
 than using cuttings, but where a very 
 large number of trees is needed and time 
 is not important this is probably the best 
 method. It is almost necessary to use it 
 for propagating the Sevillano variety, 
 which is difficult to root from cuttings, 
 even with the use of root-promoting hor- 
 mones. 
 
 Directions, Germination of seeds. It 
 is advisable to secure seeds in November 
 from black fruits of the Redding Picho- 
 line or some other variety such as the 
 Chemlali, in which a high percentage of 
 the seeds germinate. The seeds are planted 
 in rows in a nursery and grown until they 
 are large enough to bud or graft, which 
 usually requires two years. 
 
 To facilitate germination, gently crack 
 the pits or clip off the tip end. Germina- 
 tion can also be hastened by soaking the 
 pits in concentrated sulfuric acid, which 
 causes partial disintegration of the pit 
 and allows the seedling to emerge more 
 readily. Pits of the Redding Picholine 
 variety were soaked in acid for 26 hours, 
 then washed thoroughly in running water 
 for 2 hours and planted. The seedlings 
 germinated in about 6 weeks, whereas un- 
 treated seed required 5 to 6 months to 
 germinate. The acid-soaking period may 
 be different for different varieties. 
 
 Some nurserymen have as sources of 
 seedlings large Redding Picholine, Mis- 
 
 EXTREME CAUTION should be taken 
 when using concentrated sulfuric acid to 
 avoid contact with the skin or eyes. 
 
 sion, or Manzanillo trees, under which 
 volunteer seedlings can be pulled up each 
 year after rainy periods during the win- 
 ter, thus saving the trouble of germinat- 
 ing seeds. Such seedlings are usually 
 grown another year in the nursery before 
 grafting or budding. 
 
 Grafting or budding the seedlings. The 
 seedlings may be grafted in the nursery, 
 using preferably the side graft shown 
 on page 22, in late February or early 
 March. Cut back the tops above the graft 
 about a month after grafting. Some nur- 
 sery trees are started in California by 
 whip-grafting scions onto seedlings or to 
 short pieces of olive roots dug up from 
 mature trees. After a callusing period in 
 moist sawdust, they are planted in nur- 
 sery rows in March. 
 
 The seedlings may be budded (see 
 lower picture, page 22) in late February 
 or early March, using the "T" or shield- 
 bud method. It is essential to cut back 
 the seedling to the bud 2 to 3 weeks after 
 budding. If the soil is somewhat dry, an 
 irrigation shortly before budding is help- 
 ful in getting the buds to "take." 
 
 The grafted or budded seedlings are 
 usually grown in the nursery row for one 
 or two years before the trees are large 
 enough to set out in the orchard. 
 
 Top-grafting. In many cases it is 
 desired to change the variety of a tree 
 or orchard. This can easily be done by 
 grafting. 
 
 Directions. Do the work in spring — 
 any time from early March to late April. 
 Select 3 to 5 well-spaced scaffold 
 branches, cutting them off as low as pos- 
 sible but leaving a smooth place to graft. 
 Cutting the branches low will eliminate 
 considerable water-sprout growth and 
 will start the tree at a desirably low 
 height. With large branches it is neces- 
 sary to use enough scions (spaced 3 or 4 
 inches apart around the trunk) to obtain 
 satisfactory healing of the stub. One 
 branch, preferably on the south or south- 
 west, should be retained as a "nurse" or 
 "safety" branch to be removed the follow- 
 
 [21] 
 
Left— "Side graft": (A) method of making cuts in stock and scion; (B) graft union tied with plastic 
 tape; (C) graft after 1 year's growth; (D) section cut through graft union. Right— "Whip grafting": 
 scion is about 4 inches long with 4 to 6 buds. Union is tied with string and waxed, or it may be 
 wrapped with tape. 
 
 SOME POINTERS ON GRAFTING 
 
 Satisfactory method of making bark graft for top-working olives: (A) side of scion that rests 
 against the wood of the stock; (B) side view of scion; (C) opposite side from A. Right— Scions in 
 place, held firmly by 2 flat-headed wire nails driven through scion (% inch, 20-gauge nails will 
 serve). After grafting, all cut surfaces are thoroughly covered with grafting wax. 
 
 B C 
 
 [22] 
 
/^i 
 
 XI 
 
 "Twig-bud" method of budding olives, using the T, or shield bud technique: A— bud stick with 
 desirable "twig-bud"; B— "twig-bud" removed; C— stock cut and prepared for insertion of bud 
 piece; D— bud in place and tied with budding rubber. Ordinary dormant buds may be used satis- 
 factorily rather than "twig-buds." 
 
 ing year. The other branches can be re- 
 moved at the trunk, either at the time of 
 grafting or a year later. 
 
 Graft the stubs not more than 3 or 4 
 hours after the limbs are cut back, using 
 the bark-graft method with 2 to 4 scions 
 in each stub unless the branches are quite 
 large, in which case more scions would 
 be necessary. Use scion wood of the de- 
 sired variety taken at the time of graft- 
 ing from trees with good fruit and bear- 
 ing characteristics. It should be % to % 
 inch in diameter, obtained from wood one 
 or two years old. Remove the leaves im- 
 mediately and keep the scion sticks con- 
 stantly moist and cool in damp burlap. 
 Scions ready for insertion should be 5 or 
 6 inches long, with 2 nodes (4 buds) 
 
 Mature tree top-worked to another variety 
 by bark-graft method; branches white-washed 
 to prevent sunburn. "Nurse branch" will be re- 
 moved when grafts can sustain tree. 
 
 above the stub, as shown above. Some- 
 times a longer, slanting cut can be made 
 on the scion, and it can be inserted 
 between the bark and the wood of the stub 
 without slitting the bark. 
 
Above— Mature olive trees shortly after being 
 transplanted to a new location. Below— Tree cut 
 back and ready to be replanted. Photographs 
 courtesy B. E. Glick & Sons, Corning. 
 
 In a test conducted in 1946 by the Cali- 
 fornia Agricultural Experiment Station, 
 a comparison was made between the bark- 
 graft and the cleft-graft methods for top- 
 working olives. Of 152 scions inserted 
 by the bark-graft method, 55 per cent 
 grew vigorously, 30 per cent were weak, 
 and 15 per cent failed to grow. With the 
 cleft-graft method, using 70 scions, 26 
 per cent were vigorous, 41 per cent were 
 weak, and 33 per cent died. 
 
 Immediately after grafting it is very 
 important that all the exposed cut sur- 
 faces be thoroughly covered with grafting 
 wax, either hot wax or one of the commer- 
 cial asphalt-emulsion grafting prepara- 
 tions. The latter type will wash off if rains 
 occur before it dries. The wax often 
 cracks; when this happens the graft 
 unions should be rewaxed once about a 
 week after grafting. 
 
 After waxing, whitewash the scions, 
 branches, and trunk of each tree. This 
 facilitates healing of the graft union by 
 reducing the temperature and prevents 
 death of the exposed wood due to sun- 
 burning. 
 
 If the grafts become very vigorous and 
 top-heavy by midsummer, especially in 
 areas where strong winds may occur, tie 
 them to stakes or prune them back to pre- 
 vent their breaking off. A vigorous sucker 
 and water sprout growth is usually ex- 
 perienced following top-working. These 
 should be removed around the scions but 
 can be left on the trunk for a time during 
 the summer to nourish the tree and to pro- 
 tect the bark from the sun. Head them 
 back, however, to prevent excessive 
 growth. Withhold nitrogenous fertilizers 
 from newly grafted trees for 2 or 3 years, 
 but continue irrigation, although the 
 water requirements are, in many cases, 
 considerably less because of the reduction 
 in leaf area. 
 
 During the next year or two after graft- 
 ing, remove the nurse branch and prune 
 the grafts lightly and judiciously to select 
 the branches that are to be retained per- 
 manently, while cutting back the other 
 
 [24] 
 
grafts gradually until the stub heals over. 
 At this time the excess grafts should 
 be completely removed. The grafted 
 branches will usually be in bearing the 
 third season after grafting. 
 
 Moving large trees 
 
 If the trees have been planted too close 
 together (e.g. 20 x 20), orchards are 
 benefited by the removal of some of them. 
 In such cases, the trees can be pulled out, 
 moved to a new location, and replanted, 
 and will be in bearing again by 3 or 4 
 years. For such an operation to be a suc- 
 cess all the primary scaffold branches 
 should be cut back to the trunk and the 
 digging and moving done during the cool, 
 wet winter months. After replanting, the 
 trees should be thoroughly watered and 
 frequent irrigations continued through 
 the summer. 
 
 Training and pruning 
 olive trees 
 
 The purposes of pruning olives are 
 the same as those outlined by W. P. Tufts 
 in California Ext. Cir. 112, Pruning De- 
 ciduous Fruit Trees: (1) to produce a 
 
 vigorous, mechanically strong, healthy 
 tree, free from sunburn, and capable of 
 producing heavy crops over a long period 
 of years; (2) to secure a tree well-shaped 
 for convenience and economy in orchard 
 management; (3) to distribute the fruit- 
 ing area well over the tree; (4) to insure 
 a succession of profitable crops; and (5) 
 to secure desired size and quality of fruit. 
 
 Young trees. Olive nursery stock in 
 gallon cans or balled and burlaped can 
 be planted with no pruning other than 
 removal of suckers or badly placed 
 branches. Bare-rooted trees should be cut 
 back to 24-30 inches from the ground. 
 After the first growing season, 3 to 5 
 laterals, well distributed around the tree 
 and spaced as widely apart along the 
 trunk as possible, should be selected and 
 the remaining branches, especially suck- 
 ers from the base, removed. By giving the 
 young orchard several summer prunings 
 much can be done at little expense in cre- 
 ating a desirable framework and elimi- 
 nating unwanted branches before they 
 develop. 
 
 The first pruning should be in May or 
 early June with another in August. It is 
 
 i %.<:. 
 
 Left tree— trained to 3 scaffold branches by two summer prunings for two years and one the 
 third. Total pruning time 5 minutes; little or no further pruning needed until tree comes into 
 full bearing. Right— no pruning. Both trees started bearing in their fourth year. 
 
 [25] 
 
The natural fruit-bearing area of olives is a 
 hemispherical shell. If this is kept in a healthy 
 growing condition production is better than if 
 tree is opened at top to try to promote fruit pro- 
 duction inside the tree. 
 
 important that the branches be removed 
 while they are small. Delaying the time 
 of pruning until the unwanted branches 
 attain a considerable size will result in 
 the removal of so much wood that the 
 growth of the tree will be retarded. 
 
 During the second, third, and fourth 
 growing seasons the pruning should con- 
 sist of removal of suckers from the base 
 of the tree, any broken branches, or those 
 crossing over in unwanted positions. Fre- 
 quently in olives there will be a number 
 of vigorous water sprouts rising verti- 
 cally up through the other branches. It 
 is advisable to remove these while they 
 are still small. Keep the pruning at a mini- 
 mum, but at the same time try to develop 
 a satisfactory system of scaffold branches. 
 Excessive cutting will delay the age at 
 which young olive trees come into bear- 
 ing. However, it is not wise to eliminate 
 pruning altogether, as this will necessitate 
 a heavy pruning and the removal of large 
 branches after the tree comes into bear- 
 ing, with no provision for selecting a 
 strong framework of branches. 
 
 Bearing trees. In the olive the fruits 
 are usually borne laterally along shoots 
 of the previous season's growth. The bear- 
 ing area is a more or less hemispherical 
 shell 2 to 3 feet in depth surrounding the 
 tree. Very few fruits are borne inside this 
 
 shell. To get maximum crops the pruning 
 should be designed to keep a continuing 
 supply of new fruiting wood and to keep 
 this entire bearing region in a vigorous 
 condition with a maximum leaf area. 
 
 This is impossible if the trees are 
 planted too close together, in which case 
 excessive shading will reduce the bearing 
 surface to the top, the south half, and 
 perhaps the upper sides of the east and 
 west halves of the tree. This of course 
 results in a reduction in yields. Cutting 
 out the top in order to let light into the 
 north half of the tree will not solve the 
 problem, as this merely eliminates fruit- 
 ing wood from one portion in an attempt 
 to produce it in another. Closely planted 
 orchards should have some trees removed. 
 
 Moderate annual pruning is necessary 
 in mature, bearing olive trees for the 
 following reasons: (1) The stimulation 
 of pruning is necessary to maintain the 
 growth of new fruiting shoots of moder- 
 ate vigor. (2) There is a continuing pro- 
 duction of dead or dying unfruitful twigs 
 caused by shading out in the fruit-bearing 
 "shell." These should be thinned out to 
 admit more light, facilitate harvesting 
 and spraying, and reduce the chance for 
 infestation by insects and diseases. (3) 
 After the tree occupies all the space that 
 can be allotted to it, with allowance for 
 good light conditions on all sides, a mod- 
 erate pruning is necessary to hold it to 
 the desired size. 
 
 Continuing unchecked growth, espe- 
 cially where trees are planted fairly close 
 together, will gradually result in the shad- 
 ing out and death of fruiting wood on the 
 sides, confining the bearing suface to the 
 tops. This condition is accompanied by 
 a marked reduction in yields. With ex- 
 tremely close planting, such as 20 x 20 
 feet, little can be done by pruning to 
 obtain satisfactory yields. Some program 
 of partial tree removal should be consid- 
 ered. 
 
 Sometimes a more severe type of prun- 
 ing is justified. Occasionally the trees 
 show numerous large scaffold branches 
 
 [26] 
 
with, at the top of each one, a small tuft 
 of fruiting wood. A gradual removal, over 
 a period of several years, of a number of 
 these large branches will finally result in 
 a better distribution of fruiting wood. 
 Older trees, especially of the Mission vari- 
 ety, sometimes grow to such great heights 
 that it is impossible to harvest the fruit 
 in the tops. In such cases a severe heading 
 back of the upright branches is justified, 
 followed by an annual cutting back of the 
 branches tending to grow out of reach. 
 
 Neglected orchards, having had little 
 or no pruning for many years, sometimes 
 require severe cutting to remove dead 
 wood and broken or crossing branches. 
 When heavy cutting is practiced, nitrogen 
 fertilizers should be withheld for a year 
 or two to avoid excessive sucker and 
 water-sprout growth. If much bark area 
 is opened to direct sunlight in pruning, 
 whitewash should be applied to avoid 
 sunburning and death of the tissues. 
 
 Once a well-spaced system of scaffold 
 branches has been established and all un- 
 necessary branches eliminated, avoid any 
 type of excessive or severe pruning. This 
 results only in the removal of fruiting 
 wood with a consequent reduction in 
 yields. Encourage instead a maximum 
 fruit-bearing "shell," reaching almost to 
 the ground around the entire tree. All 
 experimental evidence in California has 
 consistently shown that, under irrigated 
 conditions, continued severe pruning of 
 olive trees reduces yields markedly with- 
 out a sufficient increase in fruit size to 
 offset the reduced yields. Many of the 
 Mediterranean olive orchards grown un- 
 der nonirrigated conditions are severely 
 pruned, however, in order to reduce the 
 leaf surface so as to reduce water loss and 
 the development of shrivelled fruits. 
 
 When "Olive Knot" is present in an 
 orchard, the pruning should be done in 
 the summer if possible to guard against 
 spreading the disease. If the pruning must 
 be done in the winter, the tools should 
 be sterilized frequently. A satisfactory 
 solution for sterilizing pruning tools con- 
 
 
 Tree above too severely pruned— most lower 
 fruiting branches removed; tuft of fruiting wood 
 at end of each scaffold branch is hard to har- 
 vest. Tree below had moderate annual pruning 
 for 5 years; vigorous, well-developed bearing 
 surface has low branches easy to harvest. Such 
 pruning results in heaviest yields. 
 
 sists of 1 ounce of corrosive sublimate 
 (mercuric chloride) , 3% gallons distilled 
 water, and y% gallon glycerine. This so- 
 lution is very poisonous. 
 
 In years of excessive fruit set summer 
 pruning may be done about July 1 to thin 
 the crop. Most growers, however, prune 
 during late winter or early spring when 
 labor is more plentiful and working con- 
 ditions are favorable. 
 
 The brush from pruning should be 
 shredded or hauled out of the orchard. 
 
 [27] 
 
Brush burning in the orchard injures the 
 trees and should be avoided whenever 
 possible. 
 
 Fruit growth 
 
 The growth of the olive fruit exhibits 
 a cyclic pattern, the first stage being one 
 of very rapid growth followed by a 
 second stage in August and September 
 when increase in size is slower. The 
 third stage, occurring in October, is again 
 one of rapid growth and comes just be- 
 fore the normal harvest period. There 
 seems to be a further gradual increase in 
 size if the fruit is allowed to remain on 
 the tree, due perhaps to the increased 
 accumulation of oil. This latter stage may 
 not be evident if the fruits are shrivelled 
 by winter freezes. Inasmuch as the value 
 of olive fruits increases markedly with 
 size, it would be very much to the 
 grower's benefit to delay the harvest of 
 canning olives as long as possible to take 
 advantage of the rapid increase in fruit 
 
 40 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 MISSION OLIVE 
 
 
 
 o^ 
 
 
 30 
 
 
 DAVIS 1947 
 
 
 
 FRUIT STARTING 
 ~T0 COLOR 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <— FRESH WEIGHT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 U — MOISTURE 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 ^/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 10 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 ^ 
 
 J 
 
 '•/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . DRY MATTER 
 
 OTHER THAN OIL 
 
 
 •/■ 
 
 
 
 l// 
 
 
 • ^^^ 
 
 •^OIL 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . r 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 JUNE JULY AUG SEPT. OCT. NOV DEC. JAN. 
 
 Graph showing growth curve of olive fruits. 
 
 Fruit growth # 
 
 I Vegetative growth 
 
 100 
 
 90 
 
 BRANCH GROWTH 
 BAR0UNI VARIETY*^ 
 
 ACCUMULATED 
 HOURS OVER 70" 
 
 BRANCH GROWTH 
 MISSION VARIETY ""^ 
 
 1000 < 
 o 
 
 500 
 
 > 
 -I 
 
 e> 
 
 Q. 
 
 H 
 
 >" 
 
 o 
 
 Z 
 
 CD 
 
 or 
 
 or 
 
 >- 
 
 UJ 
 
 2 
 Z> 
 
 5 
 
 o 
 
 o: 
 
 I-: 
 
 >' 
 
 d 
 
 3 
 
 O 
 
 o 
 
 UJ 
 
 < 
 
 UJ 
 
 < 
 
 Q. 
 
 < 
 
 3 
 
 o 
 
 o 
 
 
 -> 
 
 < 
 
 </> 
 
 O 
 
 z 
 
 Q 
 
 ~3 
 
 u. 
 
 i 
 
 < 
 
 2 
 
 ~3 
 
 < 
 
 <o 
 
 O 
 
 z 
 
 <-» 
 
 1949 
 
 1950 
 
 Olives show no distinct "flushes" of growth such as are found in citrus; active vegetative growth 
 seems rather to be correlated with occurrence of temperatures over 70° F. 
 
 [28] 
 
Potassium-deficient leaves (left) show dead areas at tip and along lateral margins. Boron-deficient 
 leaves (right) have dead areas only at tip together with a yellow transition zone. See pages 41-42. 
 
 [29] 
 
Olive parlatoria scale. Purple spots appear on green and red fruits at harvest. See page 50. 
 
 [30] 
 
Oleander scale. Green spots remaining on the dark, ripening fruit are caused by this insect. 
 
 See page 52. 
 
 [31] 
 
Peacock spot. Black spots first appear on the green leaves causing them to turn yellow and drop. 
 
 See page 56. 
 
 [32] 
 
size occurring in October. It is inadvis- 
 able, of course, to delay harvest to the 
 point where the processing qualities of the 
 fruit would be affected, or where damage 
 from early frosts is likely. 
 
 The increase in fruit size coming in 
 October is accounted for largely by an 
 increase in the moisture content of the 
 fruit. Obviously if the tree is suffering 
 from a lack of readily available soil mois- 
 ture during this period the expected in- 
 crease in fruit size might not occur. On 
 the contrary, it is well known that under 
 conditions of high transpiration and low 
 soil moisture the leaves will withdraw 
 water from the fruits, causing them to 
 shrivel. It would seem very important for 
 the grower to keep his trees amply, but 
 not excessively, supplied with water dur- 
 ing the period just preceding harvest of 
 the fruit. 
 
 About August 1 the accumulation of 
 oil in the fruit begins with a gradual in- 
 
 crease through the fall and winter months, 
 reaching its maximum perhaps in late 
 December or January. 
 
 Vegetative growth 
 
 The graph on page 28 shows measure- 
 ments made of the shoot growth of the 
 Barouni and Mission varieties during the 
 period from March 15, 1949, to Decem- 
 ber 15, 1950. Vegetative growth com- 
 mences about the first of April and con- 
 tinues until about the middle of October. 
 The growth rate is fairly uniform, with 
 no abrupt flushes of growth as found in 
 citrus fruits. Also shown in the graph is 
 a curve for the accumulated hours over 
 70 °F., which seems to coincide fairly 
 well with the growth curves. This would 
 indicate that vegetative growth in the 
 olive starts when an appreciable number 
 of hours over 70°F. are experienced daily 
 and ceases when there is a lack of hours 
 above this temperature. 
 
 4. Setting a Satisfactory Crop . . • the 
 
 effects of controllable and noncon- 
 trollable influences on fruit set. 
 
 Olive trees throughout the world some- 
 times fail to set a satisfactory crop even 
 though they are well cared for and make 
 excellent vegetative growth. Part of the 
 problem is simply that of alternate-bear- 
 ing, the trees so exhausting their nutrient 
 reserves with one heavy crop that they 
 are unable to produce in the year fol- 
 lowing. 
 
 However, it is quite common for some 
 orchards to continue for several years 
 setting little or no fruit each year. The 
 causes for such nonbearing are not clear. 
 Evidence indicates that over a period of 
 years the importance of cultural methods 
 as they influence the yields is probably 
 secondary to influences of climate. 
 Weather conditions, varying with seasons 
 and years, are probably the most funda- 
 mental forces. 
 
 In California the period from about 
 February 1 to July 1 is an important one 
 
 in the setting of an olive crop. From 
 March 1 to 15 the first microscopic evi- 
 dence of flower formation in the buds 
 can be seen. Following this is a very rapid 
 development of the floral parts, with the 
 extension of the flower clusters — full 
 bloom occurring about 8 weeks after ini- 
 tiation of the floral parts. Coinciding with 
 this is the beginning of vegetative growth, 
 taking place about April 1 in California. 
 It is obvious, therefore, that a heavy drain 
 on the food reserves in the tree is occur- 
 ring during this period. It would be to 
 the grower's advantage in obtaining a 
 good fruit set to have his trees in top con- 
 dition during this time. 
 
 One of the causes for an unsatisfactory 
 fruit set in some orchards in certain years 
 is the lack of a sufficient number of per- 
 fect flowers. Orchards have been observed 
 where practically the entire bloom was 
 composed of staminate flowers. These are 
 
 [33] 
 
believed to be the result of an abortion of 
 the pistil, occurring during the early de- 
 velopment of the floral parts. It may be 
 that a deficiency of water, mineral nu- 
 trients, carbohydrates, or even some 
 natural flower-forming hormone during 
 the period of floral development (March 
 and April) could lead to an abortion of 
 the pistil. Other factors that influence 
 fruitfulness in the olive will be discussed 
 below. 
 
 Temperature 
 
 The olive tree is unfruitful unless it is 
 exposed to a certain amount of cold dur- 
 ing the winter period. In experiments at 
 Davis, half of a group of young bearing 
 
 trees growing in large containers were 
 kept in a warm greenhouse throughout 
 the winter, while the other half remained 
 out-of-doors. None of the greenhouse 
 trees bloomed or fruited, whereas the out- 
 door trees bloomed and fruited normally. 
 As shown in the table below, high winter 
 temperatures seem to be associated with 
 low-yielding or unfruitful trees. The win- 
 ter-chilling requirement is probably dif- 
 ferent for different varieties. 
 
 Olives in California usually bloom 
 from about May 1 to June 1, depending 
 upon the season, variety, and location. 
 Damage to the crop from spring frosts is 
 rare during bloom, as the average dates 
 for the last killing frost are: Oroville, 
 
 Relationship between the amount of winter cold and 
 fruitfulness in olives. 
 
 Locality 
 
 Mean 
 
 January 
 
 temperature 
 
 Minimum 
 
 recorded 
 
 temperature 
 
 deg. F. 
 
 deg. F. 
 
 45.3 
 
 17 
 
 45.0 
 
 13 
 
 45.4 
 
 18 
 
 44.2 
 
 12 
 
 47.6 
 
 20 
 
 49.6 
 
 22 
 
 45.0 
 
 21 
 
 50.6 
 
 28 
 
 53.3 
 
 23 
 
 53.5 
 
 23 
 
 55.0 
 
 25 
 
 52.0 
 
 21 
 
 53.0 
 
 
 57.6 
 
 
 59.8 
 
 12 
 
 66.8 
 
 26 
 
 63.0 
 
 41 
 
 60.2* 
 
 36 
 
 71.1 
 
 52 
 
 Satisfactory yields 
 
 Orland, California 
 
 Oroville, California 
 
 Lindsay, California 
 
 Marseilles, France 
 
 Athens, Greece 
 
 Seville, Spain 
 
 Rome, Italy 
 
 Tunis, Tunisia 
 
 Unsatisfactory yields 
 
 Santa Barbara, California 
 
 San Fernando, California 
 
 San Diego, California 
 
 Riverside, California 
 
 Famagusta, Cyprus 
 
 Bogota, Colombia 
 
 Trees unfruitful 
 
 Weslaco, Texas 
 
 Homestead, Florida 
 
 Guatemala City, Guatemala . 
 Nairobi, Kenya, Central Africa 
 Honolulu, T.H 
 
 Mean July temperature, corresponding to January temperature in localities north of the equator. 
 
 [34] 
 
March 17; Corning, March 8; Orland, 
 March 4; and Lindsay, March 19. There 
 have been years, however, when the un- 
 opened buds were damaged by late cold 
 spells coming in April. 
 
 The occasional occurrence of hot, dry 
 winds during the blooming period is 
 associated with poor sets of fruit. Such 
 winds occurring during June, when there 
 is a period of natural drop of the young 
 fruit, may increase the amount of fruit 
 dropping. Fruits that are still on the tree 
 by July 1 will as a rule continue on to ma- 
 turity. This is in contrast to the situation 
 in some Mediterranean countries, where 
 there may be several periods of fruit drop 
 throughout the summer. 
 
 Irrigation 
 
 The fact that practically the entire olive 
 acreage in California is grown under sum- 
 mer irrigation is argument for the bene- 
 fits of this practice in securing satisfac- 
 tory crops. Irrigation results in increased 
 yields because of its effect in causing the 
 production of new fruiting wood, increas- 
 ing fruit set as well as fruit size, and pre* 
 venting shrivelled fruits. 
 
 If the normal spring rainfall has been 
 lacking or light, so that the trees may be 
 suffering from a lack of moisture during 
 the critical spring period, one or two pre- 
 bloom irrigations would certainly seem 
 advisable. This is borne out by an irri- 
 gation experiment conducted in the 
 
 spring of 1951 in a Sevillano orchard at 
 Corning in cooperation with the Agricul- 
 tural Extension Service. 
 
 March and April, critical months in the 
 floral development of the olive, were ex- 
 tremely dry — only 0.2 inch of rain fall- 
 ing from about the first of March until 
 April 28. The normal amount of rainfall 
 expected during this period at Corning is 
 about five inches. Three adjacent experi- 
 mental plots were established: No. 1 had 
 one irrigation on April 1; No. 2 had 
 one on April 14; No. 3, the unirrigated 
 plot, had no irrigation until after bloom. 
 
 All three plots experienced about 1.9 
 inches of rain from April 28 to May 7. 
 The unirrigated plot, therefore, was with- 
 out water during most of the time the 
 flower buds were forming, from March 1 
 to April 28. The effect of the three differ- 
 ent irrigation treatments on the crop was 
 determined by making counts of the num- 
 ber of fruits per 100 inflorescences and by 
 obtaining yield records per tree at har- 
 vest. These results are given in the table 
 below. In years of normal or excessive 
 spring rainfall a pre-bloom irrigation 
 would, of course, be unnecessary. 
 
 Rainfall during bloom does not 
 decrease fruit set. Occasionally 
 showers will fall during the olive-bloom- 
 ing period, and the question arises as to 
 how this may affect the set of fruit. Ex- 
 periments were conducted at Davis in 
 1950 in which one tree was kept wet 8 
 
 The effect of pre-bloom irrigation on fruit set and yields of olives 
 
 in a year of low spring rainfall (0.2 inch from March 1 to 
 
 April 28 — normal rainfall, 5 inches), Sevillano variety, 
 
 Corning, thirty trees per plot. 
 
 Plotl 
 Plot 2 
 Plot 3 
 
 Date of first irrigation 
 
 April 1 
 
 April 14. . . . 
 After bloom 
 
 Soil moisture 
 on April 20 
 
 (per cent) 
 
 11.4 
 8.7 
 
 Fruits per 100 
 inflorescences 
 
 2.7 
 2.3 
 
 1.4 
 
 Yields per tree 
 
 lb. 
 101 
 113 
 
 65 
 
 [35] 
 
hours a day during the blooming period 
 by a sprinkler placed in the top of the tree, 
 while an adjacent tree received the same 
 amount of water on the ground under the 
 tree. Fruit-set counts made on both trees 
 showed the sprinkled tree to have a 
 slightly heavier set than the nonsprinkled. 
 The sprinkling seemed to have no adverse 
 effects under the conditions of this test. 
 
 Mineral nutrients 
 
 Nitrogen. Apply nitrogen fertilizers 
 early enough so that they will be absorbed 
 by the tree by March 1. Applications of 
 commercial fertilizers should be made in 
 late December or January, and manures 
 should be applied the previous fall. It is 
 well known that continued application 
 of nitrogen fertilizers will cause increased 
 yields of olives in California. This is due, 
 in part, to the increased production of 
 fruiting wood. Also there is evidence, 
 especially in the shallow soils of Butte 
 County, that nitrogen applied several 
 months prior to bloom will result in in- 
 creased fruit set. Some growers in that 
 area are cautious about applying too 
 much nitrogen for fear of causing an ex- 
 cessive fruit set and developing an alter- 
 nate-bearing condition. Olive trees in 
 deeper and more fertile soils are not so 
 responsive to changes in the nitrogen 
 fertilization practices. 
 
 Boron. One of the symptoms of boron 
 deficiency in Butte County was unfruitful 
 olive trees. Some trees appeared to blos- 
 som and set fruit normally; then most of 
 the immature fruit dropped during July 
 and August. Such trees would be expected 
 to have a boron content of 14 to 15 p.p.m. 
 in the leaves. However, severely affected 
 trees, which would have a boron leaf con- 
 tent of 7 to 13 p.p.m., produced few, if 
 any, blooms. 
 
 Potassium. As shown in the table on 
 page 42, potassium deficiency in olives 
 causes marked reduction in yields. This 
 is due to the lack of new vegetative 
 growth, failure to produce a satisfactory 
 bloom, and a reduction in fruit size. 
 
 Other than the mineral nutrients men- 
 tioned above, there is no evidence that a 
 mineral deficiency in California soils 
 exists sufficient to result in a reduction 
 in the fruit set and yield of olives. 
 
 Carbohydrates 
 
 Little can be done by the grower to 
 increase the carbohydrate level in the tree 
 other than maintaining a heavy, vigorous 
 leaf area. This can be accomplished by 
 irrigation, nitrogen fertilization, wide 
 spacing of the trees, minimum pruning, 
 and control of such diseases as Peacock 
 Spot, which tends to partially defoliate 
 the tree. 
 
 Artifically increasing the carbohydrate 
 level in the tops of trees during the flower- 
 forming period of March and April has 
 been done experimentally by girdling the 
 branches in mid-February. In some cases 
 this has resulted in definite increases in 
 the percentage of perfect flowers, fruit 
 set, and yields. In girdling, a strip of 
 bark about *4 inch wide is removed from 
 most of the primary scaffold branches on 
 the tree. A grape-girdling knife does this 
 very rapidly. The girdled area is covered 
 immediately with grafting compound. 
 
 This practice has been most effective 
 when performed on young, vigorous 
 trees. It has, however, several disadvan- 
 tages and is advisable only as a last resort 
 in getting the trees to set a crop. In or- 
 chards infected with olive knot, it is quite 
 likely that the bacteria will become estab- 
 lished in the girdling cuts. The olive knot 
 can usually be kept out, however, if the 
 cuts are immediately covered with hot 
 grafting wax, then with a Bordeaux-mix- 
 ture paste, and finally with an asphalt- 
 emulsion grafting compound. Bordeaux 
 paste applied directly to the girdling cut 
 causes considerable injury to the tissues 
 and is not advised. 
 
 Alternate bearing 
 
 This occurs in olives as it does in 
 apples, pears, and many other fruit spe- 
 cies. The physiological basis for this con- 
 
 [36] 
 
dition is the fact that flowering and fruit- 
 ing is an exhaustive process, a heavy crop 
 removing a considerable amount of the 
 various carbohydrate materials, organic 
 nitrogenous substances, and other essen- 
 tial nutrients from the tree. Thus ade- 
 quate stored-food reserves are not avail- 
 able for the production of a crop the fol- 
 lowing year. 
 
 Alternate bearing may develop follow- 
 ing an unusually heavy crop. The most 
 satisfactory method for preventing it is 
 the prevention of excessively large crops. 
 In the olive, with its erratic bearing be- 
 havior, it is difficult to predict the occur- 
 rence of an excessive fruit set. Usually it 
 cannot be determined until about the mid- 
 dle to the last of June. Therefore the only 
 practical way to prevent excessively heavy 
 crops is to remove by thinning some of 
 the young fruits after they have set. 
 
 Experiments conducted with olives in 
 Butte County by the Agricultural Exten- 
 sion Service and later experiments con- 
 ducted by the Agricultural Experiment 
 Station in Davis indicate that the alter- 
 nate-bearing tendency can be overcome 
 by fruit-thinning. This must be done early 
 in the season, however, preferably in late 
 June or early July. In controlling alter- 
 nate bearing, thinning would, of course, 
 be done only in years of heavy crop set; 
 and once a regular bearing pattern was 
 established, the thinning could be dis- 
 continued, perhaps for several years. 
 
 There is no clear-cut evidence that al- 
 ternate bearing can be controlled by any 
 pruning method. However, it is possible 
 that, where it is a continuing problem, 
 if the pruning given the trees can be de- 
 layed until late June of the "on" year, 
 it may be used as a substitute for fruit 
 thinning. Pruning may not be as effective 
 as thinning in overcoming alternate bear- 
 ing, however, since leaves as well as fruit 
 are removed. This type of pruning should 
 be "detailed" rather than the removal of 
 large branches. 
 
 With olives as with other fruit crops, 
 no fertilizer practice, either as regards 
 
 time or amount of application, can be re- 
 lied upon to eliminate alternate bearing. 
 Nitrogen fertilization may raise the vol- 
 ume of production without greatly chang- 
 ing the pattern of fluctuating yields 
 through the years, the trend being about 
 parallel with unfertilized orchards. How- 
 ever, excessive applications of nitrogen 
 in the winter or early spring may result in 
 a heavy fruit set and lead to alternate 
 bearing. This is especially true in the 
 Butte County districts. 
 
 Thinning 
 
 Other than the possible alleviation of 
 alternate bearing, the benefits of fruit 
 thinning are as follows: (1) increased 
 fruit size, (2) earlier fruit maturity with 
 less chance for frost-damage and shrivel- 
 ling at harvest, (3) higher oil content, 
 (4) greater flesh-pit ratio, (5) reduction 
 in harvesting cost, (6) less limb break- 
 age, (7) production of more fruiting 
 wood for the next season's crop, and (8) 
 increased yields over a period of years. 
 
 The disadvantages of thinning are the 
 difficulty and cost of obtaining thinning 
 labor and the reduction in total yield the 
 year the thinning is done. The increased 
 fruit size will not offset the reduced num- 
 ber of fruits ; therefore the premium paid 
 for larger fruits must be enough to over- 
 come reduced yields. 
 
 In general, thinning will not pay unless 
 trees are definitely overloaded. When 
 they do have an excessive fruit set, how- 
 ever, especially the Mission olive, thin- 
 ning may be very profitable because it 
 increases to canning size fruit that other- 
 wise may have to be sold for oil extrac- 
 tion. In years when high prices are paid 
 for oil olives, thinning would be of less 
 value, as there is a smaller price differ- 
 ential between the various fruit sizes. 
 Thinning relatively young trees is fairly 
 inexpensive, taking from % to 1% mam 
 hours per tree. For the older, large trees 
 the task is formidable, almost discourag- 
 ing the grower from spending money for 
 thinning. It is possible, however, that 
 
 [37] 
 
satisfactory post-bloom chemical spray 
 thinning may develop to the point where 
 hand labor would be unnecessary. 
 
 Hand thinning. Do not thin trees un- 
 less they are definitely overloaded. Ex- 
 perienced growers know the maximum 
 fruit set their trees can handle and still 
 maintain a satisfactory fruit size at ma- 
 turity. This is approximately 3 to 5 fruits 
 per foot of twig, depending on such fac- 
 tors as age and vigor of trees. 
 
 Do the thinning as early as possible 
 for maximum benefits. From mid-June to 
 July 10 is the preferable time. The bene- 
 fits of reduction in alternate-bearing are 
 obtained only with very early thinning. 
 Later thinning, in late July or August, 
 will cause increased fruit size for the 
 remaining fruits — but the total reduc- 
 tion in yield is proportionately increased. 
 
 For protecting the hands, wear heavy 
 rubber gloves or tape the fingers. 
 
 Use both hands, stripping fruit from 
 several twigs at once. 
 
 Thin only those twigs where at least 
 5 or 6 olives can be removed at one pull. 
 Try to leave, on an average, 3 to 5 olives 
 per foot of twig. Unless enough fruits are 
 removed the benefits of thinning will not 
 be obtained. 
 
 To check on results, at least at first, 
 leave overloaded, unthinned trees near 
 the thinned ones. 
 
 Pollination 
 
 The need for cross-pollination in olives 
 has long been a debated question, both in 
 the Mediterranean countries and in Cali- 
 fornia. Experimental work in Italy 
 showed that most varieties examined 
 were self-sterile, a few were self-fertile, 
 and some were partially self-fertile. The 
 planting of pollinizer varieties was rec- 
 ommended. On the other hand, workers 
 in Portugal found that hundreds of acres 
 of isolated olive orchards of one variety 
 are planted alone where, in some years, 
 fruit production is excessive. 
 
 In California many large orchards of 
 a single variety have borne satisfactory 
 
 crops, although some of the highest and 
 most consistent yields are in orchards 
 where two varieties are interplanted. 
 
 Experimental work now in progress at 
 the California Agricultural Experiment 
 Station has shown that, in some years at 
 least, cross-pollination is decidedly bene- 
 ficial in increasing fruit set. 
 
 Growers contemplating the planting of 
 new orchards of two or more varieties 
 may find it profitable to interplant them, 
 especially if orchards of other varieties 
 are not nearby. It would probably facili- 
 tate harvesting operations to plant the 
 varieties in groups of four rows each. 
 
 Delayed harvest 
 
 Excessively loaded olive trees usually 
 fail to produce fruit of sufficient size by 
 October to justify harvesting them for 
 canning olives. Consequently the fruits 
 are allowed to remain on the trees until 
 January or February and are harvested 
 then for oil extraction. Such late-har- 
 vested trees produce little, if any, fruit 
 the following year. Trees with a light to 
 moderate crop, however, usually produce 
 fruits of size sufficient to be harvested 
 in October for canning olives. These 
 early-harvested trees have usually been 
 observed to return a satisfactory crop 
 the following year. It was concluded from 
 this that late-harvesting was detrimental 
 to the subsequent crop. However, recent 
 experiments in two Mission orchards in 
 Butte County have failed to bear out this 
 opinion. Adjacent groups of trees in the 
 same orchard have been harvested early 
 (October), medium (December), and 
 late (February). Yields the following 
 year were practically the same in each of 
 the three plots. The same results were 
 obtained each year for four years. 
 
 It may be that the lack of a subsequent 
 crop with heavily loaded, late-harvested 
 trees is due simply to alternate-bearing. 
 The trees probably exhausted their stored 
 foods maturing the heavy crop and would 
 not have set a crop the following year 
 even if they had been harvested early. 
 
 [38] 
 
5. Production of the Crop • • • the cuf- 
 
 turai practices that will contribute 
 
 to satisfactory yield through the years. 
 
 Fertilizers 
 
 Nitrogen fertilizers in California 
 olive orchards have been so beneficial in 
 causing increased yields that most grow- 
 ers annually apply nitrogen to their trees 
 at the rate of about % to 2 lb. of actual 
 nitrogen per tree. 
 
 This can be applied as animal manures 
 or as one of the chemical fertilizers listed 
 in the table on page 40. The choice of fer- 
 tilizers should be determined on the basis 
 of which will supply a pound of nitrogen 
 at the lowest cost. Manures should be ap- 
 plied in the fall as they are rather slowly 
 available to the trees, but commercial 
 fertilizers are best applied in late Decem- 
 ber or January. As fruit bud differentia- 
 tion, floral development, and fruit setting 
 occurs in the olive during the period from 
 March 1 to June 15, apply the fertilizers 
 far enough in advance so that they may 
 be absorbed and available to the trees 
 during this time. 
 
 Concentrated organic nitrogen (urea) 
 fertilizers have been applied experimen- 
 tally to olives at the rate of 12 lb. per 100 
 gallons as foliage sprays, during the 
 period of floral development (March 1 to 
 April 15) . Leaf analysis showed that the 
 olive absorbs nitrogen in this form 
 through the leaves. In some experiments 
 fruit set has been increased over the non- 
 fertilized trees, although in general the 
 benefits have not been sufficient to justify 
 the increased cost of this method of ap- 
 plication. 
 
 Nitrogen fertilizers have been applied 
 to olive trees experimentally as high as 
 30 lb. of ammonium nitrate per tree (10 
 lb. of actual nitrogen) without causing 
 any leaf injury or other injurious effects. 
 However, it is uneconomical to practice 
 continued heavy applications of nitrogen 
 fertilizers to olives. Under such condi- 
 tions, the amount of nitrogen in the tree, 
 as determined by leaf analysis, never ex- 
 
 [ 
 
 ceeds about 2 per cent of the dry weight 
 of the leaves, indicating that there is a 
 maximum limit the tree will absorb. Addi- 
 tional nitrogen will be leached out of the 
 soil. At the other extreme, trees greatly 
 deficient in nitrogen never drop below a 
 nitrogen level of about 0.9 per cent of the 
 dry weight of the leaves. Average or- 
 chards in good condition show a nitrogen 
 level in the leaves of about 1.4 to 1.8 per 
 cent. 
 
 If leaves are dark green and the new 
 shoot growth is 4 to 12 inches a year, the 
 trees are probably adequately supplied 
 with nitrogen. If leaves are a medium to 
 light green and are not making a shoot 
 growth of at least 4 inches per year, it is 
 likely that the trees are deficient in nitro- 
 gen and would respond to fertilizer appli- 
 cations. Chemical soil analyses are not 
 considered to be a reliable means of judg- 
 ing the fertilizer requirements of trees 
 because they do not allow for the tree's 
 ability to absorb the elements — nor is it 
 possible to get a soil sample representa- 
 tive of the entire orchard. Leaf analysis 
 is a much better method, although fer- 
 tilizer requirements probably can best be 
 judged by the trees' response to test appli- 
 cations. 
 
 There is some evidence, especially in 
 Butte County, that increased fruit set can 
 be caused by heavy applications of nitro- 
 gen, which have resulted in excessive 
 crops and have caused an alternate-bear- 
 ing condition to develop. This will not 
 always hold true, however, especially if 
 the trees are planted in deep, fertile soils 
 and are already adequately supplied with 
 nitrogen. It has also been reported that 
 applied nitrogen will delay fruit maturity 
 as it does in other fruit crops. This may 
 not necessarily be true unless trees are 
 heavily loaded, in which case fruit matu- 
 rity is generally delayed, regardless of 
 cause. 
 
 39] 
 
It is believed by some that applications 
 of nitrogen following bloom will cause 
 increased fruit size. In general, the ex- 
 perimental work with nitrogen fertiliza- 
 tion of olives, as well as other fruit crops, 
 has not substantiated this belief. It is also 
 the observation of some growers that 
 "soft-nose" (see page 55) may be asso- 
 ciated with heavy nitrogen fertilization 
 practices, especially when nitrogen is ap- 
 plied as manure. 
 
 Two 4-year nitrogen fertilization ex- 
 periments were conducted with Manza- 
 nillo olives by the Agricultural Extension 
 Service in Tulare County from 1937 to 
 1940. One was in an orchard in poor con- 
 
 dition with trees planted 24 x 24 feet, the 
 other in an orchard in fair condition with 
 trees 30 x 30 feet apart. In addition to the 
 check treatment, nitrogen was added to 
 plots in each orchard at the rate of 1 lb., 
 and 2 lbs., of actual nitrogen per tree per 
 year. The average yield per tree for the 
 4-year period was as shown at the top of 
 page 41. 
 
 The main responses to fertilization in 
 both these tests were (1) increased tree 
 growth, providing a large increase in 
 bearing surface; and (2) the setting of 
 larger numbers of fruits. Fruit size was 
 not increased; in fact with some of the 
 very heavy sets size decreased proportion- 
 
 Comparison of some of the common forms of nitrogen-containing 
 
 fertilizers. 
 
 Per cent 
 nitrogen 
 
 (N) 
 
 Per cent 
 phosphate 
 
 (P 2 6 ) 
 
 Per cent 
 potash 
 
 (K 2 Q) 
 
 Approximate 
 number of 
 pounds required 
 to supply 
 one pound 
 of nitrogen 
 
 Inorganic concentrated fertilizers 
 
 Ammonium sulfate 
 
 Calcium nitrate 
 
 Sodium nitrate 
 
 Ammonium nitrate 
 
 Ammonium phosphate (16-20) . 
 Anhydrous ammonia 
 
 Organic concentrated fertilizers 
 
 Nu Green (urea) 
 
 Fish meal* 
 
 Tankage* 
 
 Dried blood* 
 
 Cottonseed meal* 
 
 Bulky organic fertilizers 
 Dairy manure (wet)*. . 
 Dairy manure (dry) * . . 
 Lot fed steer manure* . 
 Poultry manure (wet) * 
 Poultry manure (dry) * . 
 Rabbit manure* 
 
 Sheep manure* 
 Olive pomace*. 
 
 20.5 
 16.0 
 16.0 
 33.0 
 16.0 
 81.0 + 
 
 44.0 
 10.0 
 
 8.0 
 12.0 
 
 7.0 
 
 0.5 
 1.0 
 2.0 
 1.6 
 2.5 
 2.0 
 1.6 
 1.0 
 
 20.0 
 
 6.0 
 10.0 
 
 3.0 
 
 0.3 
 0.5 
 0.6 
 1.3 
 2.3 
 1.3 
 1.0 
 0.3 
 
 2.4 
 
 12.0 
 
 8.0 
 
 2.0 
 
 0.7 
 1.8 
 1.9 
 0.9 
 1.2 
 1.2 
 3.0 
 0.7 
 
 5.0 
 6.3 
 6.3 
 3.0 
 6.3 
 1.2 
 
 2.3 
 10.0 
 12.0 
 
 8.0 
 14.3 
 
 200 
 100 
 50 
 63 
 40 
 50 
 63 
 100 
 
 * These organic materials vary widely in analysis between lots. The figures given are averages and useful 
 only for estimates. 
 
 [40] 
 
Orchard I (24x24) 
 (poor condition) 
 Orchard II (30x30) 
 (fair condition) 
 
 No fertilizer 
 181b. 
 161 
 
 1 lb. N. per 
 tree per year 
 
 141 lb. 
 323 
 
 2 lb. N. per 
 tree per year 
 
 186 lb. 
 367 
 
 ately. No particular difference in time of 
 fruit maturity was reported. 
 
 In orchards already under a high level 
 of nitrogen fertilization, the marked re- 
 sponces obtained above with nitrogen- 
 deficient trees would not be experienced 
 by further increases in nitrogen appli- 
 cations. 
 
 In similar tests conducted by the Agri- 
 cultural Extension Service in Tehama 
 County with Sevillano olives the follow- 
 ing conclusions were drawn: 
 
 ( 1 ) Yield and income tended to increase 
 with each year of application of nitrogen. 
 The fertilizers induced better bud devel- 
 opment and additional growth so that the 
 effect of annual applications was cumula- 
 tive. 
 
 (2) Sizes were reduced by nitrogen ferti- 
 lizers, when expressed on a percentage 
 basis, but the greater total yield resulted 
 in greater production of larger sizes as 
 well as of the smaller sizes. 
 
 (3) The percentages of culls in the ferti- 
 lized olives was higher than in the non- 
 fertilized and seemed to be associated 
 
 with a vigorous, rank type of growth. No 
 marked difference in pickling quality or 
 flavor was apparent in olives from trees 
 with or without nitrogen fertilization. 
 
 Potassium. The paragraphs on potas- 
 sium and boron deficiencies apply only 
 to Butte County; at present there is no 
 record of deficiency of these minerals in 
 any other olive-producing area. 
 
 In 1947, olive trees in the Wyandotte 
 area of Butte County showed leaf symp- 
 toms later identified as caused by potas- 
 sium deficiency. Analysis of these leaves 
 showed them to contain 0.11 per cent 
 potassium on a dry-weight basis. Previous 
 extensive work by Lilleland and Brown 
 of the California Agricultural Experiment 
 Station in orchards in different parts of 
 California had established the average 
 potassium level for olives to be from 0.8 
 to 1.0 per cent. 
 
 Heavy applications of potassium (25 
 to 50 lb. of potassium sulfate per tree) 
 to olive trees in the potassium-deficient 
 areas of Butte County have produced the 
 following responses: 
 
 Left: Mission olives from trees fertilized with one application of 50 lb. potassium sulfate per tree. 
 Right: Fruits from potassium-deficient trees. 
 
 [41] 
 
(1) a change in leaf color from a light 
 bronze-green to dark green; 
 
 (2) elimination of the development of 
 dead areas in margins and tips of the 
 older leaves; 
 
 (3) increased shoot growth; 
 
 (4) increased fruit size; and 
 
 (5) increased yields. 
 
 These responses have been accom- 
 panied by an increase in the potassium 
 content of the leaves. With the exception 
 of the Palermo and Wyandotte areas of 
 Butte County, it is unlikely that olives in 
 the commercial olive-producing sections 
 of the state will respond at the present 
 time to potassium fertilizers. 
 
 Boron. For a number of years olive 
 trees in the Wyandotte area of Butte 
 County exhibited the following symp- 
 toms, diagnosed as being caused by 
 
 For differences in the leaf symptoms 
 of potassium- and boron-deficient trees 
 see page 29. 
 
 boron deficiency: (1) Short, branched 
 growth takes place in contrast to the long, 
 straight shoots of normal trees. (This 
 branching is apparently caused by the 
 death of the terminal bud, which forces 
 growth out from lateral buds. These new 
 terminal buds in turn die, and additional 
 branching occurs.) (2) In severe cases 
 the ends of the limbs die, and, in some 
 cases, the limbs may die back to the main 
 trunk. (3) The leaves are small with 
 brown, scorched tips, and with an inter- 
 mediate golden-yellow area between the 
 dead tips and the green basal area. There 
 are no dead areas along the lateral mar- 
 gins such as occur with potassium-defi- 
 
 Effect of potassium fertilizers on Mission olives in a potassium- 
 deficient soil (Graves orchard), Wyandotte, 
 Butte County, California. 
 
 
 Check 
 (No treatment) 
 
 10 lb. potassium sulfate 
 
 per tree 
 
 (Applied Jan. 1949) 
 
 « * 
 
 50 lb. potassium sulfate 
 
 per tree 
 
 (Applied Nov. 1947) 
 
 Yields per tree 
 
 1948 
 
 lb. 
 
 40 
 36 
 
 21 
 47 
 
 lb. 
 
 84 
 
 116 
 
 53 
 
 lb. 
 151 
 
 1949 
 
 1950 
 
 128 
 173 
 
 1951 
 
 157 
 
 Size grades (per cent) 
 Extra large 
 
 (1949) (1950) (1951) 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 2 1 
 
 17 17 4 
 
 80 81 97 
 
 (1949) (1950) (1951) 
 
 
 
 10 3 
 
 6 2 10 
 
 50 18 36 
 
 43 80 51 
 
 (1949) (1950) (1951) 
 113 
 
 Large 
 
 Medium 
 
 Standard 
 
 Sub-standard 
 
 11 3 2 
 17 20 6 
 49 38 22 
 22 37 67 
 
 
 
 Oil content of fruits 
 (Fresh weight basis) 
 
 23.8 per cent 
 
 
 24.9 per cent 
 
 Leaf analysis (Potassium 
 as per cent dry weight) 
 June, 1947 
 
 0.11 
 0.21 
 0.15 
 
 
 0.11 
 
 Nov., 1948 
 
 0.82 
 
 Aug., 1951 
 
 0.50 
 
 
 
 [42] 
 
Boron deficiency is shown in defective olives (upper) known as "monkey-face" fruits; and in twig 
 dieback (lower), with death of terminal growing point and subsequent branching. 
 
 [43] 
 
cient leaves. (4) The Ijark may become 
 thickened and corky, and in some cases 
 may develop a rough, blister-like appear- 
 ance. (5) Trees affected with this diffi- 
 culty have a high percentage of defective 
 fruits, locally termed "monkey-faced." 
 (6) Yields are reduced because of the 
 early dropping of fruits before harvest. 
 
 Experimental injections of copper, 
 manganese, boron, and zinc salts directly 
 into limbs of affected trees were made in 
 the spring of 1941. A definite response 
 was found only with the boron injections. 
 Later tests showed that this same favor- 
 able response could be obtained by apply- 
 ing borax to the soil under the trees at 1 
 pound per tree. 
 
 There is a correlation between the 
 severity of the symptoms and the boron 
 content of the leaves. Trees showing 
 severe deficiency symptoms have a boron 
 content of 7 to 13 p. p.m. ; mild symptoms, 
 14 to 15 p.p.m.; doubtful range, 16 to 18 
 p.p.m.; normal boron content, 19 p.p.m., 
 and up. 
 
 Olives are semi-tolerant to excess boron 
 and are not likely to be injured by borax 
 applications continued for several years 
 at the recommended rate of % to 1 pound 
 per tree. With the exception of a few 
 isolated cases, definite response of olives 
 to boron applications has been found 
 to occur only in the Butte County olive 
 district. Leaf analyses from trees in well 
 maintained orchards in other commercial 
 areas have shown they are in the normal 
 range for boron, although it is possible 
 for future deficiencies to develop. 
 
 No evidence exists at this time that 
 olives in California will respond to any 
 fertilizer other than nitrogen and (in 
 Butte County only) potassium and boron. 
 Orchards will not respond even to ferti- 
 lizers containing these elements if the 
 trees already have an adequate supply. 
 
 Irrigation is essential 
 in California 
 
 The majority of the olive trees in the 
 world are grown without supplementary 
 
 irrigation, depending only upon natural 
 rainfall. Exceptions are Greece, with 7 
 per cent of the acreage under irrigation; 
 Spain, with 10 per cent; Egypt, with 40 
 per cent; Chile, with 90 per cent; and 
 California with almost 100 per cent. You 
 may want to consult one of the two follow- 
 ing University of California publications 
 for further information: California Agr. 
 Ext. Cir. 50 — Essentials of Irrigation and 
 Cultivation of Orchards; and Calif. Agr. 
 Exp. Sta. Bulletin 715, Irrigation Experi- 
 ments with Olives. 
 
 The olive appears to be well adapted 
 to withstanding drought. The leaves are 
 relatively small and leathery and have a 
 thick cuticle on the upper surface that 
 tends to restrict the loss of water. On the 
 under surface the leaves are protected by 
 a mass of peltate hairs. The stomata, 
 while numerous on the lower surface, are 
 sunken and have small openings. The 
 leaves are apparently uninjured by long 
 periods of hot weather and dry soil condi- 
 tions. It is, however, a misconception that 
 the olive does not use much water. It will 
 use as much as other species, and possibly 
 more if water is available. Oil varieties 
 of olives can be grown quite successfully 
 without irrigation; but table varieties, 
 at least under California conditions, re- 
 quire irrigation to prevent the fruit's 
 shrivelling and to obtain profitable yields. 
 
 Recent experimental work in Califor- 
 nia has shown that olives respond to a 
 lack of readily available soil moisture 
 just as other trees do. The growth rate of 
 the olive fruits is decreased by a lack of 
 readily available soil moisture. In addi- 
 tion to summer irrigation, olives should 
 have earlier spring and later fall irriga- 
 tions than are necessary with deciduous 
 fruits. 
 
 There is no "optimum" or best soil- 
 moisture content for plant growth. Exper- 
 iments with various fruit tree species 
 have shown that water may be used by 
 plants with equal ease throughout the 
 entire range of soil-moisture content 
 
 [44 
 
between the field capacity and the per- 
 manent wilting percentage. 
 
 Field capacity is all the water a soil will hold 
 after it is drained. Permanent wilting percent- 
 age is the soil-moisture condition at which plants 
 cannot obtain water readily. 
 
 Water taken by trees from the soil is 
 almost entirely given off as water vapor 
 through the leaves by transpiration. Soil 
 moisture, sunlight, temperature, humid- 
 ity, and wind all affect the rate of trans- 
 piration. Large trees because of greater 
 leaf area use more water than small ones. 
 The presence or absence of fruit does not 
 materially affect the amount of water 
 used, since the main water loss is through 
 the leaves. Evergreen trees, such as the 
 olive, will use water throughout the year, 
 but much less in winter than in summer. 
 
 The total amount of water that com- 
 parable trees use will not be greater on a 
 clay than on a sandy soil, if both are 
 fertile and have readily available water 
 at all times. Usually on sandy soils, how- 
 ever, water must be applied more fre- 
 quently and in smaller amounts than on 
 clay soils. Likewise, on shallow, hardpan 
 soils, trees should be irrigated more fre- 
 
 quently with smaller applications of water 
 than on deep soils. 
 
 One of the best methods by which the 
 grower can decide when his trees need 
 water is by watching some of the broad- 
 leaved weeds, which may be left as indi- 
 cator plants in various parts of the 
 orchard. Generally, such weeds are deep- 
 rooted enough to indicate by their wilt- 
 ing a lack of readily available water in 
 the soil occupied by the roots of the trees. 
 Where only small streams of irrigation 
 water are available, the time necessary to 
 cover the orchard may be so long that the 
 trees irrigated last are decidedly affected 
 before they receive water. It is important, 
 therefore, to anticipate when the per- 
 manent wilting percentage will be reached 
 so that irrigation may be started soon 
 enough. 
 
 The benefits derived from good irriga- 
 tion practices are cumulative and take 
 several years to appear. Increased crops 
 result chiefly from increased size of trees, 
 which in turn depends on trees being 
 kept healthy and vigorous. One of the 
 chief factors in keeping trees vigorous 
 is an irrigation plan providing readily 
 available soil moisture at all times. The 
 
 Trees on left are in a low, poorly drained spot, tree to right in a better drained area. 
 
 [45] 
 
results of poor irrigation or failure to 
 irrigate, on the other hand, are quick to 
 appear and generally take the form of 
 smaller yields, smaller fruit, poorer fruit 
 quality, and stunted trees. 
 
 It is important that the grower of can- 
 ning olives supply his trees with enough 
 water to prevent fruit-shrivelling. On 
 shallow soils during the hot days of 
 August and September, especially if dry 
 winds are blowing, it may be impossible 
 to keep sufficient water on the entire 
 orchard to prevent at least some trees 
 from showing shrivelled fruit. Although 
 such fruits will regain their turgor after 
 irrigation, they often shrivel again dur- 
 ing processing and become a poor-quality 
 product. 
 
 Poor drainage 
 
 Olives cannot be grown profitably in 
 areas where either the surface or subsoil 
 drainage is poor. Trees in these locations 
 show stunted growth, numerous dead 
 twigs, small, yellowish-green leaves, poor 
 yields, and prematurely ripe fruit — with 
 eventual death of the trees. Unless such 
 portions of the orchard can be adequately 
 drained, it is advisable to discontinue 
 growing olives there; and if you are 
 planting a new orchard you will, of 
 course, want advance information about 
 the drainage characteristics of the site 
 you are considering. 
 
 Soil management 
 
 Covercrops are used chiefly for three 
 purposes: To maintain good soil struc- 
 ture and to increase water penetration. 
 In many soils there is better water pene- 
 tration after a few years of covercrops, 
 resulting in a more economical use of 
 water and a better supply to the roots. 
 The use of covercrops is not a substitute 
 for careful soil handling. Cultivation 
 when the soil is too wet will puddle many 
 soils so badly that years of good care may 
 be required to repair the damage. The 
 use of covercrops under the conditions 
 of California's interior valleys apparently 
 
 does not increase the moisture-holding 
 capacity of the soil, however, as it may 
 under cool, humid climatic conditions. 
 In experiments at Davis, 25 years of 
 annual covercrops have failed to change 
 measurably the moisture-holding capacity 
 of the soil. 
 
 To prevent erosion. Covercrops may 
 be of great value on slopes subject to 
 erosion. Not only do they increase the 
 rate of penetration of water and thus 
 reduce the runoff, but their roots tend to 
 hold the soil in place and reduce the 
 amount of washing by the part that does 
 flow away. 
 
 To increase soil nitrogen with legumi- 
 nous covercrops. Such covercrops with 
 proper inoculation of nitrogen-fixing bac- 
 teria have given increases of total nitro- 
 gen in the soil in cool, humid regions. 
 Experiments carried out in the hot, inte- 
 rior valley surrounding Davis, however, 
 failed to show any measurable nitrogen 
 increase with either summer or winter 
 legumes. In the climatic conditions under 
 which olives are grown, this benefit would 
 be unimportant and commercial fertili- 
 zers should be relied upon to maintain 
 the desired nitrogen level in the soil. 
 
 Some of the annual covercrops used 
 are: (1) the winter legumes — yellow 
 clover (Melilotus indica) , the vetches, 
 and bur clover; (2) the summer leg- 
 umes — cowpeas, soybeans; (3) the win- 
 ter non-legumes — the mustards, rye, oats, 
 barley, and volunteer weeds; (4) the 
 summer non-legumes — orchard grass, 
 sudan grass, and weeds. 
 
 Some of the benefits of covercrops such 
 as improved water penetration can be 
 obtained by bringing into the orchard 
 organic material — sawdust, straw, or 
 manures — and working it into the soil. 
 Strawy material, which is high in carbo- 
 hydrates and low in nitrogen, will cause 
 a depressed nitrate level in the soil for 
 months after being used. (This is due to 
 the utilization of the nitrogen by bacteria 
 in the decomposition of organic mate- 
 rial.) The applications of such material 
 
 [46] 
 
should be accompanied, therefore, by 
 extra amounts of nitrogen fertilizers. 
 
 Remember that covercrops absorb 
 nitrogen while growing, and during that 
 period they may compete seriously with 
 the tree unless additional nitrogen is 
 supplied. The covercrops will use a con- 
 siderable portion of the soil moisture 
 and, if they are grown during the summer, 
 provision should be made for supplying 
 an additional amount of irrigation water. 
 
 Sod culture. Many California olive 
 growers are placing their orchards under 
 permanent sod culture, realizing that they 
 must provide extra water and nitrogen 
 for utilization by the sod. Permanent fur- 
 rows are established before planting the 
 sod, or irrigation may be by sprinkler 
 systems. The grass is kept low by mow- 
 ing, or in some cases livestock is allowed 
 to graze in the orchard. Stock will rarely 
 eat the olive leaves as long as a plentiful 
 supply of grass is available. 
 
 Under this system the expense of culti- 
 vation is eliminated, the entire root zone 
 is undisturbed by cultivation instruments, 
 the sod provides an excellent erosion 
 
 ItliC t.:i. 
 
 Olive orchard under sod culture with sprin- 
 kler irrigation; sod culture is not advisable 
 where water is limited. 
 
 check, and orchard operations are 
 feasible soon after irrigations. Sod cul- 
 ture would not be advisable unless ample 
 irrigation water is available and unless 
 nitrogen is supplied in addition to the 
 amount normally used for the trees alone. 
 For sod culture perennial rye grass has 
 proved satisfactory, and in some cases 
 volunteer native vegetation is sufficient. 
 Clean cultivation. Most California 
 olive orchards are grown under a system 
 of clean cultivation, whose chief purposes 
 are to: 
 
 (1) remove the competition of weeds for 
 available soil moisture; 
 
 (2) facilitate the distribution of irriga- 
 tion water; and 
 
 (3) incorporate covercrops and manure 
 with the soil. 
 
 Since olive trees are shallow-rooted, 
 even on deep soils, deep or excessive 
 cultivation may seriously injure the root 
 system. The practice of subsoiling 
 between tree rows is seldom justified. 
 Where olives are grown on very shallow 
 soils, it may be advisable to eliminate 
 cultivation entirely in order to allow 
 penetration of the entire soil mass by the 
 tree roots. 
 
 Oil sprays have for some years been 
 used to control weeds in citrus orchards 
 and, to a limited extent, in olive orchards. 
 Where this method has been used growers 
 report improved soil conditions, and no 
 harmful effects have been observed. 
 Because of the increasing cost of oil, 
 some olive growers have recently dropped 
 this practice in favor of weed control by 
 mowing. 
 
 Types of sprays that can be used are: 
 (1) the general-contact weed killers, 
 such as Diesel oil, fortified with phenol 
 compounds or sulfur. (For more infor- 
 mation see California Agr. Ext. Cir. 137, 
 General Contact Weed Killers.) (2) emul- 
 sions, made by combining water and oil; 
 and (3) water-soluble materials, such as 
 sodium trichloracetate, or the selective 
 weed killers such as 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. 
 (See also California Agr. Ext. Cir. 133, 
 
 [47] 
 
2,4-D as a Weed Killer — out of print, but 
 available for reference in most Farm 
 Advisor offices.) The selective weed 
 killers are widely used in grain fields for 
 controlling broad-leaved weeds. 
 
 The use of 2,4-D and related materials 
 is hazardous in olive orchards as the olive 
 is especially sensitive to injury, and it is 
 difficult to prevent drift from weeds onto 
 the trees. 
 
 Harvesting the crop 
 
 Harvesting the crop is the largest ex- 
 pense involved in growing olives, repre- 
 senting 50 to 70 per cent of the total pro- 
 duction labor cost, and 30 to 40 per cent 
 of the gross returns from the crop. This 
 expense is increased with very tall trees, 
 
 TO LOWER HARVESTING COSTS 
 Develop a system of pruning and tree 
 spacing that will encourage the natural 
 spreading tendencies of some varieties. 
 Annual removal of dead and interfering 
 branches facilitates picking and encour- 
 ages the production of higher-quality 
 fruit. 
 
 (2) Wherever possible adopt cultural 
 methods which permit the skirts of the 
 trees to reach the ground, using tillage 
 implements designed so that in moving 
 about the grove they will not injure the 
 lower branches. 
 
 (3) Teach pickers to use both hands 
 and pick toward the container. The hands 
 should move together rather than in- 
 dependently. 
 
 (4) The pickers should go to the highest 
 point for the fruit with each new set of 
 the ladder and pick coming down the 
 ladder. 
 
 (5) Many growers would obtain in- 
 creased picker efficiency if they could 
 arrange to manage the picking crew 
 themselves or at least have a good fore- 
 man handle the crew rather than leave 
 it to a picking contractor. 
 
 (These recommendations are based on 
 a harvesting study made in 1948 in Tu- 
 lare County by the Agricultural Extension 
 Service.) 
 
 an excessive amount of bushy, dead 
 growth in the trees, heavy grass in the 
 orchard, severe infestations of black 
 scale, or other factors that make picking 
 difficult 
 
 Canning olives. Olives are harvested 
 for pickles in California from mid-Sep- 
 tember to mid-November, depending 
 upon the variety (see the table on page 
 9). The optimum harvesting time is 
 determined by the color and texture of 
 the olives. It is advisable to delay harvest- 
 ing as long as possible to allow the fruit 
 to attain its maximum size. 
 
 Fruits are picked by hand and must be 
 handled carefully, especially the Ascolano 
 variety, to avoid bruising. Over-mature 
 or badly bruised olives will usually de- 
 velop spoilage during processing. It is 
 important that the olives be taken to the 
 processing plant as soon as possible after 
 picking. The maximum period between 
 picking and placing in the processing 
 solution should be from 12 to 14 hours. 
 For fruits that must be hauled long dis- 
 tances this presents an important prob- 
 lem. Olives kept too long in boxes after 
 harvesting start "sweating"; this gives 
 rise to deterioration during processing. 
 
 Low temperature injury to can- 
 ning fruit. The olive pickling harvest 
 season should be concluded before about 
 November 10 to avoid risk of freezing 
 injury to the fruits. If trees are heavily 
 overloaded the fruit may not be mature 
 enough for pickling by this time. Such 
 trees should have had the fruit thinned 
 in late June, so that proper size and 
 maturity could be obtained before danger 
 of frost. 
 
 The average date of the first killing 
 frost is December 3 at Corning, Novem- 
 ber 26 at Oroville, and November 14 at 
 Lindsay. Freezing temperatures as low as 
 25° to 28° F. (-3.9° to -2.2° C.) for an 
 hour may result in damage to fruits, con- 
 sisting of shrivelling, softening, or pitted 
 flesh. Injury is much more likely to occur 
 if moisture is present on the fruits than 
 if they are dry. When it is suspected that 
 
 [48] 
 
SIZE AND COLOR GRADES OF 
 CANNING OLIVES 
 
 Fruits must reach a certain minimum 
 size at harvest, depending upon variety, 
 or they cannot be used for canning. This 
 is according to regulations of the Market- 
 ing Order for Olives. These are the mini- 
 mum sizes: 
 
 Mission and Manzanillo Standard 
 Obliza Medium 
 
 Ascolano, Barouni, and 
 
 St. Agostino Mammoth 
 
 Sevillano Giant 
 
 Generally accepted color standards 
 to determine harvesting time of the major 
 varieties are as follows: 
 
 Manzanillo — straw color, up to and 
 including a light red blush, covering not 
 more than half of any olive; 
 
 Mission straw color, up to and in- 
 cluding a complete coloring of light red; 
 
 Sevillano — straw color to a light red 
 coloring of not more than half of any 
 olive; 
 
 Ascolano — straw color to not more 
 than a faint blush of red on any olive; 
 
 Barouni — straw color. 
 In addition, any variety of olive is con- 
 sidered immature if it will not yield a 
 characteristic white juice under moderate 
 pressure between the thumb and finger. 
 
 the temperature has dropped to a danger- 
 ously low level during a still night, do not 
 touch the fruits until they warm up 
 gradually. It is possible for their tempera- 
 ture to drop considerably below the freez- 
 ing point without ice crystals forming 
 unless fruits are shaken or jarred, in 
 which case they freeze immediately. 
 
 The damage is variable between or- 
 chards and often does not appear until 
 after processing, when the olives become 
 mealy and soft. There seems to be no 
 difference between varieties in regard to 
 the freezing point of their fruits, although 
 small fruits will freeze more quickly than 
 large ones. Green fruits are more sus- 
 ceptible to freezing injury than red or 
 
 black. Olives that have been frozen are 
 permanently injured, become shrivelled, 
 and will not regain their normal turgor 
 even with added irrigation water or rain- 
 fall. Such fruits cannot be used for can- 
 ning and should be allowed to remain on 
 the tree and harvested for oil extraction 
 later in the winter. 
 
 During the latter part of the harvest- 
 ing period, another type of fruit shrivel- 
 ling often occurs, in which the cells of the 
 fruit are not injured and the canning 
 quality is not impaired. Such shrivelling 
 may develop when minimum night tem- 
 peratures of 32 to 35 degrees F. occur, 
 accompanied by strong, drying winds. 
 The loss of water from the leaves exceeds 
 the uptake of water by the roots, with the 
 consequent withdrawal of water from the 
 olives, shrivelling them. However, if such 
 conditions are followed by low transpira- 
 tion conditions, such as cloudy, rainy, 
 or foggy weather, with higher tempera- 
 tures, the fruit regains its normal turgor 
 and is apparently uninjured. This type 
 of shrivelling is more likely to occur with 
 heavy than with light crops, probably 
 because of the relative immaturity of the 
 fruit on heavily loaded trees. Such green 
 fruit would have a lower carbohydrate 
 content and would be unable to withstand 
 the removal of water by the leaves as well 
 as would more mature fruit with a higher 
 carbohydrate content. 
 
 Oil olives. If during October and 
 November you find that your fruits will 
 not be large enough for canning, you can 
 leave them on the tree until mid-December 
 or as late as mid-February. By this time 
 the fruit is completely black and has 
 attained its maximum oil content. 
 Although it will be shrivelled and perhaps 
 frozen because of the low winter tempera- 
 tures, this does not impair its value for 
 oil extraction. During the canning-harvest 
 season you can pick the trees over for the 
 larger fruits and let the small ones remain 
 for use later in oil extraction, especially 
 with Mission and Manzanillo. In Califor- 
 nia the returns from oil olives are lower in 
 
 [49] 
 
most years than can be obtained for can- 
 ning fruit. 
 
 Oil olives may be harvested by hand- 
 picking or by spreading canvas sheets 
 under the tree and beating the limbs with 
 poles to cause the fruit to drop. This 
 practice is not desirable from the stand- 
 point of the tree as it tends to break off 
 fruiting twigs and causes openings in the 
 
 bark which allow the entrance of olive- 
 knot bacteria. Beating poles may also 
 cause the spread of olive knot through 
 the orchard. Mechanical devices, such as 
 tree shakers, have been tried in California 
 to facilitate the harvesting of oil olives, 
 but none has been entirely successful. In 
 some countries small rakes are used to 
 strip the fruit from the branches. 
 
 6. Pests and Diseases . • • how to identify 
 
 them ... some recommended controls. 
 
 This section on Insect Pests was prepared by E. M. Stafford, Associate Entomologist in the 
 Experiment Station, except for the paragraph on Nematodes, which was prepared by Dr. M. W. 
 Allen, Assistant Professor of Entomology. 
 
 Insect pests 
 
 The three principal pests which olive 
 growers may have to control are olive 
 scale, oleander or ivy scale, and black 
 scale. In some parts of California, grow- 
 ers use the term "olive scale" to designate 
 oleander or black scale. The term "olive 
 scale" can properly be applied only to the 
 olive parlatoria scale, generally distrib- 
 uted only in the San Joaquin Valley from 
 Kern County north through Stanislaus. 
 Oleander and black scales are commonly 
 found in all olive-growing regions of 
 California. 
 
 Olive scale {Parlatoria oleae [Col- 
 vee]). Often a grower finds olive scale 
 for the first time during harvest. Then the 
 sharply outlined dark purple spots caused 
 by the scale appear in marked contrast 
 with the yellow-green background of the 
 ripening fruit. (See color photo, page 
 30.) 
 
 What to look for. The adult female 
 scale has a small gray covering some- 
 what less than % 6 inch long. The cover 
 is circular or oval with a small black 
 spot near the edge. 
 
 The male scale has a narrow elongate 
 cover, with a smaller black spot at one 
 end. Beneath the coverings the bodies of 
 male and female scales are reddish purple. 
 Both male and female may live on any 
 part of the tree above ground. On leaves 
 they may cause a slight chlorosis, and on 
 
 small twigs the wood is often a little de- 
 formed and darkened. 
 
 When the infestation is heavy, the 
 scales settle on the fruit as soon as it is 
 formed in the spring. Often this results in 
 a badly deformed olive at harvest. In 
 early June the scales make their charac- 
 teristic dark purple spots on the small 
 fruit. These tend to fade out as the fruit 
 
 
 Olive fruits at harvest severely damaged by 
 olive (parlatoria) scale. 
 
 [50] 
 
grows rapidly. A grower cannot survey 
 his orchard for the presence or absence 
 of olive scale by looking for purple-spot- 
 ted fruit in mid-season. By mid-August 
 the young, very small (and very difficult 
 to see) scales may be on the fruit without 
 causing any change in color. 
 
 What to do. Natural enemies have 
 given no effective control of olive scale 
 in California. It has been necessary to use 
 chemical control measures wherever sup- 
 pression of this insect was desired. Recent 
 introductions into California of new para- 
 sites and predators of the olive scale may, 
 in time, change this present situation of 
 total dependence on chemical control. 
 
 Best spray control is obtained from 
 treating eggs and young scale of the first 
 brood (late May to July 1) . Use 1 pound 
 of 25 per cent parathion wettable powder 
 plus 1% gallons of light-grade summer 
 oil emulsion per 100 gallons of water. 
 Because of the hazard to honeybees, pa- 
 rathion spray is not permitted until after 
 bloom. Thorough spray coverage is 
 necessary. General experience has shown 
 that better control has resulted from the 
 use of a greater number of gallons of 
 spray per tree. This has been true when 
 spraying with hand operated guns, oscil- 
 lating nozzle boom sprayers, or blower- 
 sprayers. If oil emulsion is not used, the 
 amount of parathion must be increased 
 to 2!/2 pounds of 25 per cent parathion 
 wettable powder per 100 gallons of water. 
 
 If spraying is not completed by July 1 
 the remainder of the application should 
 be delayed until the period — July 15 to 
 August 1. At this later time another brood 
 of eggs and young will be present. During 
 the first part of July the scales are adults 
 and are more difficult to kill. 
 
 Growers may not wish to disturb irri- 
 gation schedules or furrows to prepare 
 the orchard for a spray rig. Mechanical 
 difficulties such as closely set trees with 
 interlaced branches may make spraying 
 operations impractical. In such cases — 
 but only if the scale infestation is light — 
 two applications of 2 per cent parathion 
 
 WARNING— For safely handling pa- 
 rathion follow instructions printed on 
 the package. Orchards sprayed with pa- 
 rathion must be posted. The County Agri- 
 cultural Commissioner will supply infor- 
 mation on laws governing pest control 
 operations. 
 
 dust may be applied by ground rig, fixed- 
 wing airplane, or helicopter. Use 100 
 pounds of dust per acre per application 
 at an interval of from 10 to 15 days, and 
 dust during the period immediately after 
 bloom to June 15, or during the period 
 July 15 to August 1. Dusts applied during 
 the first period give somewhat better 
 control. In general, dusting with parath- 
 ion does not give as effective control 
 as full-coverage parathion sprays. This 
 is especially true of outside tree rows. 
 
 A much less effective spray than pa- 
 rathion, but much less hazardous to ap- 
 ply, is two gallons of medium summer oil 
 emulsion per 100 gallons of water. 
 
 To avoid possible injury to trees, do 
 not spray with either parathion-oil or 
 oil alone when the temperature is over 
 90 °F. Oil spray injury (especially when 
 an excessive dose of oil is used) appears 
 on the fruit as small dark spots or raised 
 corky tissues, where oil has penetrated 
 the pores of the fruit. Usually, the pores 
 of fruit sprayed with oil in July or August 
 are a little darker and more noticeable 
 than those of unsprayed fruit. This condi- 
 tion of the pores cannot be seen on dark 
 ripe olives. It is most easily seen on olives 
 pickled by the "green-ripe" process, but 
 it is not noticeable enough to affect the 
 quality of the canned olives. 
 
 Tent fumigation using HCN (hydrogen 
 cyanide) gas has generally been effective 
 but costly. Certain varieties — especially 
 
 DO NOT SPRAY OR DUST OLIVE FRUIT 
 WITH PARATHION AFTER AUGUST 1. 
 This is a regulation of the State Depart- 
 ment of Agriculture, Bureau of Chemistry. 
 
 [51] 
 
the Mission olive — are susceptible to 
 HCN injury. Trees may be fumigated 
 from about mid-July through the autumn 
 and winter up to March 1. 
 
 Oleander scale (Aspidiotus hederae 
 [ Vallot] ) . In sharp contrast to symptoms 
 of the olive scale, that part of the olive 
 beneath and near an oleander scale is de- 
 layed in maturing. This results in green 
 spots on dark, ripe fruit. (See actual color 
 photo, page 31.) 
 
 What to look for. The whitish cover- 
 ing of the adult female oleander scale 
 may be slightly larger than Y^q inch in 
 diameter. It is circular, with a yellow or 
 light brown spot near the center. Male 
 scales are somewhat elongate. The female 
 scale body beneath the shell is yellow, 
 but that of the male is a brownish yellow. 
 These scales often appear in greatest num- 
 bers on the leaves of the lower inside part 
 of the tree. Oleander scales have the 
 ability to deform the fruit greatly. Very 
 heavy infestations may reduce the oil 
 content as much as 25 per cent. 
 
 What to do. Natural enemies of the 
 oleander scale may keep this insect at a 
 low level for many years. In some regions 
 and in certain years chemical control 
 becomes necessary. 
 
 Spray oleander scale with Yz to 1 
 pound of 25 per cent parathion wettable 
 powder plus 1% gallons of light-grade 
 summer oil emulsion per 100 gallons of 
 water. Sprays may be applied after bloom 
 through June and July up to August 1. 
 Thorough spray coverage is necessary. 
 
 The use of parathion without oil or oil 
 without parathion, tent fumigation, and 
 spraying at temperatures above 90° F. 
 are discussed under olive scale. This dis- 
 cussion also applies to control of oleander 
 scale. 
 
 Black scale (Saissetia oleae [Bern.]). 
 Trees infested with black scale often have 
 black sooty-appearing leaves which are 
 very sticky. Pickers do not like to harvest 
 the black, sticky fruit. Black scale may 
 greatly reduce the vigor and productivity 
 of olive trees. 
 
 What to look for. Black-scale adult 
 females are from % 2 to about % 6 inch 
 long. They are dark brown or black with 
 a very tough outer skin. The ridges on 
 their backs form a characteristic "H" 
 shape. Dead scales may remain attached 
 to the twigs for 2 or 3 years. The young, 
 found on the leaves, are yellow to orange 
 in color. These scales secrete a sticky 
 liquid, or honeydew, which supports the 
 growth of a black fungus. Often the feed- 
 ing of the scale so weakens the trees that 
 many leaves drop and the next season's 
 crop is reduced. Before reaching the adult 
 stage, most of the scales move to the twigs 
 to complete their growth. 
 
 What to do. Prolonged hot weather 
 may kill a large per cent of the very young 
 scale making chemical control unneces- 
 sary. In the northern part of the interior 
 valley of California the black scale is often 
 held in check by natural enemies. This is 
 
 Black scale on olives, in various stages of de- 
 velopment. Younger scales on leaves with "rub- 
 ber" and adult stages on twig. (Photograph by 
 E. M. Stafford.) 
 
 [52] 
 
especially true where sprays for other 
 olive insects and diseases are not neces- 
 sary or are not regularly applied. In this 
 area chemical control of low infestations 
 of black scale may not be advisable. Con- 
 trol chemicals kill both the black scale 
 and its insect parasites and predators. 
 Once started, the grower may thereafter 
 have to depend on chemical control. On 
 the other hand, it has generally not been 
 necessary to spray olives more than two 
 consecutive years for control of black 
 scale anywhere in the interior valley. 
 
 Spray with light-medium grade sum- 
 mer oil at the rate of 1% to 2 gallons per 
 100 gallons of water. In the interior valley 
 this spray should be applied in late July 
 or early August to control the young scale 
 after all the eggs have hatched. In certain 
 regions in the valley — particularly the 
 northern part — hatching becomes ex- 
 tended through the summer and fall. 
 When this occurs oil sprays should be 
 applied from about August 10 to August 
 20. Do not spray when the temperature is 
 higher than 90° F. 
 
 A spray of 1% pounds of 50 per cent 
 DDT wettable powder plus 2 gallons of 
 kerosene per 100 gallons of water may be 
 used to kill young stages. As the scales 
 reach the large gray stages — or "rubber" 
 stage — preceding maturity, they become 
 very difficult to kill with either petroleum 
 oil or DDT. DDT sprays must not be used 
 on the fruit because of their penetration 
 into the oil of the olive. Thus DDT sprays 
 may be used in controlling black scale 
 only after the harvest of pickling varieties. 
 The earlier the olives mature and are 
 picked, the greater are the chances that 
 the grower may spray before the scales 
 reach the rubber stage. 
 
 The development of black scale varies 
 widely from year to year and from or- 
 chard to orchard, even within a county. 
 For best timing of either oil or DDT- 
 kerosene sprays, inspect each orchard to 
 see that (1) the eggs have nearly all 
 hatched and (2) the scales are not too 
 far developed for control. Do not time 
 
 sprays for black scale by calendar date 
 alone. 
 
 Tent fumigation using HCN gives very 
 effective control of black scale on olives. 
 Be very careful in fumigating olive vari- 
 eties susceptible to HCN injury. 
 
 Greedy scale (Aspidiotus camelliae 
 Sign.). This scale insect may easily be 
 mistaken for oleander or olive scale. The 
 shell covering is more conical in shape, 
 however, with a small black spot to one 
 side of the center. The body beneath the 
 shell is yellow. Use the same control meas- 
 ures as for olive scale. 
 
 Red scale (Aoinidiella aurandi 
 [Mask.]). This very important citrus 
 pest is often found on olives in southern 
 California. The female adult has a thin, 
 circular shell about % 6 inch in diameter. 
 The body color is reddish and shows 
 through the scale shell. Use the same con- 
 trol measures as for olive scale. 
 
 Thrips. Occasionally thrips and dam- 
 age attributed to thrips have been 
 reported on olives in California. In the 
 Mediterranean region a species of thrips 
 (not found in California) causes de- 
 formed leaves. Its feeding on the young 
 olives causes dimples, accompanied by 
 scarring typical of thrips. Damage by 
 thrips has never been serious enough in 
 this state to warrant a study of control 
 measures. 
 
 Grasshoppers. These insects cause 
 severe damage to olive fruit, but the 
 amount of fruit attacked does not usually 
 warrant control. Where necessary, spray 
 the ground cover with aldrin. Be very 
 careful that aldrin sprays are not applied 
 to the foliage or fruit on the trees. The 
 federal food and drug administration has 
 no tolerance for aldrin on olive fruit. 
 
 If strong-flying green grasshoppers are 
 in the trees, spray them with TEPP (tetra- 
 ethylpyrophosphate) . 
 
 Branch and twig borer (Polycaon 
 confertus Lee.) . This beetle bores a small, 
 round hole at the base of a bud or in the 
 fork of a small branch. As a result, the 
 twigs may break at these holes. The 
 
 [53] 
 
beetles do not breed in live olive wood. 
 They normally breed in dead wood, 
 chiefly the madrone, oak, and old grape 
 canes. The elimination of such dead wood 
 is probably all that is necessary to prevent 
 severe attacks of this beetle. 
 
 Olive bark beetle {Leperisinus cali- 
 fornicus Swaine). Growers may notice 
 small dead twigs on olive trees near piles 
 of olive prunings. Often this is due to 
 the work of the olive bark beetle, which 
 bores holes in small twigs in much the 
 same manner as the branch and twig 
 borer. The olive-bark beetle is about % 
 inch long and black with a whitish pat- 
 tern on the back. It breeds on unhealthy 
 trees or olive prunings. In areas where 
 this insect is a pest, cut olive wood should 
 be burned, fumigated with HCN, or 
 sprayed with benzene hexachloride. 
 
 American plum borer {Euzophera 
 semifuneralis [Wlkr.]). The moths are 
 pale gray with reddish brown and black 
 markings. Full-grown larvae are about 1 
 inch in length. The larvae of the moth 
 attack soft, spongy tissue such as that of 
 tree wounds, grafts, and olive-knot tis- 
 sue. From such tissue the larvae may con- 
 tinue feeding into healthy tissue and thus 
 
 American plum borer common in Corning 
 area. Above— adult moth; below— larval stage 
 which causes the injury (photo by R. M. Hoff- 
 man). 
 
 Root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus vulnus) 
 causes longitudinal cracking on olive roots at 
 right. At left are uninjured roots. 
 
 girdle fairly large limbs. No effective 
 easy control measure is known, since it 
 is difficult to keep rapidly growing tissue 
 protected by either insecticides, grafting 
 wax, or other coverings. 
 
 Nematodes. The root-lesion nem- 
 atode, Pratylenchus vulnus Allen and Jen- 
 sen, is known to attack the roots of olive 
 trees in several areas in California. In- 
 fested trees may be characterized by 
 symptoms of poor growth and dieback of 
 small branches. Young trees planted in 
 infested soil frequently fail to make satis- 
 factory growth and are dwarfed or 
 stunted. The larger roots of infested trees 
 have symptoms of longitudinal cracking 
 of the root cortex. The area underneath 
 these cracks is darkened and necrotic in 
 appearance. The necrotic lesions are typi- 
 cal of the attack of the root-lesion nema- 
 tode. 
 
 The nematodes are normally present in 
 the root tissue immediately adjacent to 
 the margins of the necrotic area. In addi- 
 tion to causing the formation of necrotic 
 lesions on the larger roots, the nematodes 
 attack and frequently kill small feeder 
 roots. This results in a considerable re- 
 duction in the number of feeder roots on 
 infested trees. 
 
 [54] 
 
The citrus nematode, Tylenchulus 
 semipenetrans Cobb, has been found 
 attacking the roots of olive in a few local- 
 ities in California. In these instances the 
 olive trees have been adjacent to, or 
 planted on, land previously occupied by 
 citrus. Information is not available con- 
 cerning the effect of citrus nematode in- 
 festations on olives. However, infested 
 trees sometimes lack vigor, and their root 
 systems are characterized by considerable 
 disintegration of small feeder roots. 
 
 Poof -knot nematodes, Meloidogyne 
 spp., sometimes attack olive roots, caus- 
 ing the formation of galls or knots on the 
 roots. When roots are heavily infested 
 they cannot carry on their normal func- 
 tions. Infested trees may have reduced 
 vigor and show symptoms of decline. 
 
 There are no known methods of con- 
 trolling nematode infestations on the 
 roots of established trees. Preplanting 
 soil-fumigation treatment of infested soil 
 may be of some value, but has not been 
 tried with olives. The use of nematode- 
 free planting stock constitutes the best 
 available method for limiting the spread 
 of root-infesting nematodes. 
 
 Nonparasitic diseases 
 
 Shotberries. This trouble is most 
 prevalent with the Sevillano and Man- 
 zanillo varieties and takes the form of 
 undersized, round-shaped fruits. It occurs 
 more frequently in some years than 
 others. The fruits develop to varying sizes, 
 and while some of the larger ones have 
 been used in pickling they are generally 
 too small to be of much value. There is no 
 seed within the pits of such fruits, and it 
 is possible that this is a delayed form of 
 pistil abortion, the pistil having developed 
 sufficiently to give some stimulation to 
 fruit growth before aborting. Many of 
 these "shotberries" drop early in the sea- 
 son, but some adhere until maturity. No 
 method is known at present for causing 
 such fruits to develop to normal size. 
 
 Soft-nose. The Sevillano variety is 
 also susceptible to this trouble, which has 
 
 been shown to be nonparasitic. This de- 
 fect does not appear until late in the sea- 
 son, during or at the end of the harvesting 
 period. The fruit starts to color at the 
 apex end, and this is followed by a shriv- 
 elling and softening. This trouble, more 
 prevalent in years of heavy crops, varies 
 in intensity from one orchard to another. 
 
 It has been observed by many growers 
 that this condition may be correlated with 
 heavy nitrogen fertilization practices, 
 especially when nitrogen is applied as 
 manure. Attempts to produce this condi- 
 tion experimentally with very heavy ap- 
 plications of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers 
 were unsuccessful. Tests were established 
 in 1950, a light crop year, in cooperation 
 with the Agricultural Extension Service 
 with the Sevillano variety at Corning. 
 Heavy applications of poultry manure 
 (500 lbs. per tree) and amounts of ammo- 
 ium nitrate equivalent in nitrogen were 
 compared. Analysis of the manure showed 
 it to contain toxic amounts of both sodium 
 and chloride (% per cent sodium and 2 
 per cent chloride). Applications of so- 
 dium chloride in amounts equivalent to 
 that in the manure caused typical "soft- 
 nose" fruit symptoms to develop. How- 
 ever, this condition failed to appear in 
 1950 in the trees treated with manure or 
 ammonium nitrate. In 1951, a heavy crop 
 year, "soft-nose" appeared in the entire 
 orchard, but was especially noticeable in 
 trees having had heavy applications of 
 nitrogen in 1950 both as manure and am- 
 monium nitrate. 
 
 Split-pit. This trouble is also found 
 largely with the Sevillano variety and is 
 a serious problem in some years. The pits 
 split gradually along the suture during 
 fruit growth, resulting in a bluntly flat- 
 tened type of fruit, which can be easily 
 distinguished by its external appearance. 
 Although the fruit is of normal size and 
 seems to process satisfactorily, it makes 
 a poor product because the pit comes 
 apart when the fruit is eaten. The cause of 
 this trouble is not clear, probably being 
 due to some particular group of environ- 
 
 [55] 
 
9 • • 
 
 Common fruit defects found in olives. Upper left: "soft-nose." Upper right: "split-pit." Lower 
 left: "shotberries." Lower right: Spray injury due to summer oil applied in excessive amounts or 
 during hot weather. 
 
 mental conditions occurring at a certain 
 stage in the growth of the fruit. Some 
 growers believe it appears when the or- 
 chard soil is allowed to become dry in 
 the early stages of fruit growth and then 
 the trees are heavily irrigated. 
 
 Parasitic diseases 
 
 Three diseases of commercial impor- 
 tance at present affect olives in California. 
 
 Two are fungous diseases, Cycloconium 
 oleaginum Cast., commonly called "Pea- 
 cock Spot," and Verticillium alboatrum 
 R. and B. The other is a bacterial disease, 
 Bacterium savastanoi E.F.S., known gen- 
 erally in California as "Olive Knot." 
 These diseases are found in the chief 
 olive-producing areas of the state, but 
 orchards can be found that are free of all 
 of them. 
 
 [56] 
 
Peacock spot. This disease, well 
 known in the Mediterranean countries, 
 has been observed in California for over 
 50 years. It is commonly found on the 
 Mission variety, occasionally on Man- 
 zanillo, and to a lesser extent on Sevillano, 
 Barouni, Ascolano, and Nevadillo. 
 
 Outbreaks seem to be associated with 
 years of above-average rainfall. Infection 
 is most prevalent on leaves in the lower 
 parts of the tree and in the interior parts 
 of the orchard, where exposure to sunlight 
 and air movement is at a minimum. The 
 disease was of little commercial impor- 
 tance before 1940 in California, but in 
 outbreaks since 1941 the productiveness 
 of some trees has been reduced by as much 
 as 20 per cent due to partial defoliation. 
 
 Infection and development of the 
 disease in healthy leaves occurs during 
 the rainy season (November through 
 May), with symptoms appearing from 2 
 weeks to 3 months after infection. Moder- 
 ate temperatures and abundant moisture 
 in the form of rain or fogs are favorable 
 to this organism. In central California the 
 activity of this disease organism is low 
 throughout the hot, dry summer months. 
 During this period it exists in diseased 
 leaves on the tree. 
 
 What to look for. Typical leaf symp- 
 toms are shown in the color photo on page 
 32. Usually found on the leaf blade, they 
 may also occur on the leaf petiole, fruit, 
 and fruit stem. Lesions almost always 
 develop on the upper surface of the leaf, 
 first appearing as inconspicuous, sooty 
 blotches and later developing into dark 
 green to black circular spots from % to 
 % inch in diameter. A faint yellow area 
 is sometimes found in the leaf tissues 
 around the spot. As the lesions expand, 
 the rest of the leaf becomes yellow and 
 finally it drops from the tree. 
 
 What to do. The successful preven- 
 tion of infection by protective fungicides 
 depends largely upon timely applications 
 of the spray. Orchards seriously affected 
 should be sprayed as soon as possible 
 after fruit is harvested for pickling. The 
 
 most satisfactory fungicides to use are 
 either a 3 per cent lime-sulfur or a 10-10- 
 100 Bordeaux mixture. The latter material 
 will have a more lasting protective effect 
 and is preferred if the spray cannot be 
 applied until November. 
 
 Verticillium. This fungous disease, 
 which has appeared in recent years in 
 California olive orchards, has been ob- 
 served since about 1900 in peach, apricot, 
 and almond orchards, where it is com- 
 monly known as "black-heart." It is due 
 to a soil-borne fungus that infects the trees 
 through the root system. It is very likely 
 to be found in soil that is or has recently 
 been planted to such crops as potatoes, 
 tomatoes, cotton, or some other truck 
 crops. Mature trees seldom die from this 
 disease, but nursery stock or trees up to 3 
 or 4 years of age may be killed. 
 
 What to look for. The disease may 
 occasionally attack the entire tree, but it 
 is usually confined sharply to one side or 
 even to only one branch. Usual symptoms 
 are the sudden collapse of one or a few 
 branches, which may be followed within a 
 few weeks by the successive collapse of 
 other branches. Very small trees often 
 wilt and die all at once. Usually the symp- 
 toms appear in May or June but some- 
 times do not occur until midsummer. The 
 most striking evidence of verticillium in 
 olives is the persistence of the dead leaves 
 and flowers, which usually remain on the 
 tree throughout the summer. In olives the 
 typical internal symptoms are not present. 
 There is no brown discoloration of the 
 wood such as is characteristic of verti- 
 cillium on other plants. 
 
 What to do. Avoid planting young 
 olive trees in soil that has recently been 
 planted to such susceptible crops as toma- 
 toes, potatoes, or cotton; avoid also in- 
 terplanting such crops in young olive 
 orchards. Since infection takes place un- 
 derground in the root system, it is impos- 
 sible to control the disease with fungicide 
 sprays. Branches killed by this disease 
 should be pruned away carefully and 
 burned. 
 
 [57] 
 
Olive knot. This disease is wide- 
 spread throughout the Mediterranean 
 countries. It was first observed in Cali- 
 fornia in 1893. A severe outbreak oc- 
 curred in Butte County about 1920 and in 
 Tehama County in 1930 and 1932. Since 
 then it has become widespread in olive 
 orchards throughout the Sacramento and 
 San Joaquin valleys. 
 
 Mission is the most resistant variety 
 to this disease, followed by Ascolano, 
 with the Manzanillo, Sevillano, and Neva- 
 dillo very susceptible. In Tulare County 
 Manzanillo is much more susceptible to 
 this disease than Sevillano. 
 
 The olive knot bacteria are abundant 
 in knots with live tissue and are exuded 
 to the surface of the knots and spread 
 downward on the branches by rains. New 
 infections occur largely during the long 
 rainy periods of midwinter, but the knots 
 do not appear until spring. Wounds of 
 some sort are appearently necessary for 
 infection. These may be freezing cracks, 
 pruning wounds, scars from dropped 
 leaves or flower clusters, and injuries 
 from ladders or from cultivation and har- 
 vesting implements. 
 
 The spread of the disease about the tree 
 is due to dissemination of the bacteria 
 over the surface of the branches, and not 
 to internal translocation of bacteria 
 
 Bacterium savastanoi (Olive Knot) injury on 
 olive twigs. 
 
 through the conducting tissues. The in- 
 fection may be spread to adjacent trees 
 by wind-borne rain. Spread of the disease 
 over longer distances is believed to be 
 due to infected pruning tools or to 
 diseased nursery stock. 
 
 What to look for. The presence of 
 this disease is very conspicuous, existing 
 in rough, roundish galls or swellings, 
 sometimes 2 inches or more in diameter, 
 on twigs, branches, trunks, roots, or even 
 on leaf petioles and fruit stalks. Galls are 
 likely to develop on the fruiting shoots in 
 the spring following winters in which low 
 temperature causes defoliation and other 
 injury to the twigs. The disease may kill 
 much of the fruit-bearing area. 
 
 What to do. There is no adequate 
 control at present for this disease in Cali- 
 fornia. Two approaches are possible, how- 
 ever: (1) removal of all knots from the 
 tree in order to reduce sources of infec- 
 tion; and (2) application of preventive 
 sprays to reduce new infections. For badly 
 infected trees the removal of all knots 
 would be impractical as it would involve 
 eliminating all the branches. Where only 
 a few knots have appeared in an orchard, 
 their removal is desirable to prevent fur- 
 ther spread of the disease. 
 
 After the knots are cut out, paint the 
 exposed surface with a disinfectant such 
 as a mixture of 1 part Elgetol to 4 parts 
 alcohol, or a mixture of 1 part Bordeaux 
 paste to 2 parts asphalt emulsion graft- 
 ing wax. Experiments have shown that 
 several applications of an 8-8-100 Bor- 
 deaux mixture during the winter months 
 reduces the number of new infections. 
 The first application should be made in 
 the fall before the rainy season begins. 
 This method may be too costly to use on 
 a commercial scale as a regular practice. 
 
 Since one of the chief methods of 
 spreading this disease is by pruning dur- 
 ing the rainy winter months when active 
 bacteria are present, all pruning in an 
 infected orchard should be done during 
 the dry summer months, when there is 
 little likelihood of spreading the disease. 
 
 [58] 
 
REFERENCES 
 
 Anagnostopoulos, P. TH. 
 
 1951. The XIII International Congress of Olericulture 1(5). Greece. 
 Bioletti, F. T. 
 
 1922. Pruning young olive trees. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 348:87-110. (Out of print.) 
 Brooks, R. M. 
 
 1948. The relative incidence of perfect and staminate olive flowers. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 
 52:213-18. 
 
 Drobish, H. E. 
 
 1930. Olive thinning and other means of increasing sizes of olives. California Agr. Exp. Sta. 
 Bui. 490:1-20. 
 Everett, H. P. 
 
 1942. Progress report on olive die-back. California Agr. Ext. Service Leaflet (Butte County). 
 (Mimeo.) 
 
 Hansen, C. J. 
 
 1945. Boron content of olive leaves. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 46:78-80. 
 Hartmann, H. T., and R. M. Hoffman. 
 
 1950. Tests on girdling olive trees. California Agriculture, February. 
 Hartmann, H. T. 
 
 1951. Time of floral differentiation of the olive in California. Bot. Gaz. 112:323-27. 
 Hendrickson, A. H., and F. J. Veihmeyer. 
 
 1949. Irrigation experiments with olives. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 715:1-7. 
 Jacob, H. E. 
 
 1934. The effect of pruning in the training of young olive trees. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 
 568:1-26. 
 Johnston, J. C, and E. C. Moore. 
 
 1941. Olive orchard fertilization. Progress Report. Tulare County Farm Bureau Olive Committee. 
 King, J. R. 
 
 1938. Morphological development of the fruit of the olive. Hilgardia 11 :437-58. 
 Lelong, B. M. 
 
 1890. The Mission olive. California State Bd. Hort. Ann. Rpt. 185-89. 
 Merrill, Grant. 
 
 1941. Olive fertilization tests in Tehama County. 20th Technical Conference California Olive 
 Assn. Proc. 
 Opitz, Karl, and A. Shultis. 
 
 1949. Tulare County olive harvesting survey, 1948. California Agr. Ext. Ser. Leaflet. (Mimeo.) 
 Scott, C. E., H. Earl Thomas, and Harold E. Thomas. 
 
 1943. Boron deficiency in the olive. Phytopath. 33 :933^11. 
 Stinson, T. E., Jr. 
 
 1951. New trees from old. Pop. Mechanics Magazine 95:81-85. 
 Tufts, W. P. 
 
 1939. Pruning deciduous fruit trees. California Agr. Ext. Cir. 112:1-62. (Out of print.) 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
 
 Appreciation is expressed to Mr. Henry Everett, Mr. Robert Hoffman, and Mr. Karl 
 Opitz of the California Agricultural Extension Service for their assistance in obtain- 
 ing much of the information included in this publication. Thanks is also given to the 
 many growers and packers who have kindly co-operated in carrying out many experi- 
 mental plots, as well as to the California Olive Association for assistance in obtain- 
 ing data concerning the industry. 
 
 Various research workers in the other olive-producing countries of the world have 
 been most generous in supplying information concerning olive-production in their 
 countries. Grateful appreciation is also expressed for their co-operation. 
 
 [59] 
 
In order that the information in our publications may be more intelligible, it is sometimes necessary 
 to use trade names of products and equipment rather than complicated descriptive or chemical 
 identifications. In so doing, it is unavoidable in some cases that similar products which are on the 
 market under other trade names may not be cited. No endorsement of named products is intended 
 nor is criticism implied of similar products which are not mentioned. 
 
 Cooperative Extension work in Agriculture and Home Economics, College <y; Agriculture, University of California, and United States Department of Agriculture 
 co operating. Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8, and June 30, 1914. J Earl Coke, Director, California Agricultural Extension Service. 
 
 5m-4,'53(A2291)AA 
 
THIS MANUAL.. 
 
 contains information of interest to anyone who is cur- 
 rently operating an olive orchard, or who is considering 
 going into the business of producing olives in California. 
 The material in the manual covers practically every phase 
 of olive production, from the economic factors involved, 
 to the diseases and pests that threaten the trees and fruit. 
 
 Selling price $.7284 
 
 State sales tax 0216 
 
 Total price /. $.75