UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES CHARLES DARWIN. THE DESCENT OF MAN And Selection in Relation to Sex By CHARLES DARWIN, M.A..F.R.S. Author of "THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES," etc., etc.; Reprinted from the Second English Edition, Revised and Augmented ILLUSTRATED A. L. BURT COMPANY, j j . j j* * * * ji PUBLISHERS, NEW YORK QH |SW- PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. DURING the successive reprints of the first edition of this work, published in 1871, I was able to introduce sev- eral important corrections; and now that more time has elapsed I have endeavored to profit by the fiery ordeal through which the book has passed, and have taken ad- vantage of all the criticisms which seem to me sound. I am also greatly indebted to a large number of correspond- ents for the communication of a surprising number of new facts and remarks. These have been so numerous that I have been able to use only the more important ones; and of these, as well as of the more important corrections, I will append a list. Some new illustrations have been in- troduced and four of the old drawings have been replaced by better ones, done from life by Mr. T. W. Wood. I must especially call attention to some observations which I owe to the kindness of Prof. Huxley (given as a supple- ment at the end of Part I), on the nature of the differences between the brains of man and tile higher apes. I have been particularly glad to give these observations, because during the last few years several memoirs on the subject have appeared on the Continent and their importance has been, in some cases, greatly exaggerated by popular writers. I may take this opportunity of remarking that my critics frequently assume that I attribute all changes of corporeal structure and mental power exclusively to the natural se- lection of such variations as are often called spontaneous; whereas, even in the first edition of the " Origin of Species," I distinctly stated that great weight must be at- iv PREFACE. tributed to the inherited effects of use and disuse, with re- spect both to the body and mind. I also attributed some amount of modification to the direct and prolonged action of changed conditions of life. Some allowance, too, must be made for occasional reversions of structure; nor must we forget what I have called " correlated " growth, meaning thereby that various parts of the organization are in some unknown manner so connected, that when one part varies so do others; and if variations in the one are accumulated by selection other parts will be modified. Again, it has been said by several critics that when I found that many details of structure in man could not be explained through natural selection, I invented sexual selection; I gave, how- ever, a tolerably clear sketch of this principle in the first edition of the " Origin of Species/' and I there stated that it was applicable to man. This subject of sexual selection has been treated at full length in the present work, simply because an opportunity was here first afforded me. I have been struck with the likeness of many of the half-favorable criticisms on sexual selection, with those which appeared at first on natural selection; such as, that it would explain some few details, but certainly was not applicable to the extent to which I have employed it. My conviction of the power of sexual selection remains unshaken ; but it is probable, or almost certain, that several of my conclusions will hereafter be found 'erroneous; this can hardly fail to be the case in the first treatment of a subject. When naturalists have become familiar with the idea of sexual selection, it will, as I believe, be much more largely ac- cepted; and it has already been fully and favorably re- ceived by several capable judges. DOWN, BECXENHAM, KENT, September, 1874 CONTENTS. PAGE. INTRODUCTION 1 PART I. THE DESCENT OR ORIGIN OF MAE". CHAPTER L The Evidence of the Descent of Man from Some Lower Form. . 5 CHAPTER II. On the Manner of Development of Man from Some Lower Form 29 CHAPTER III. Comparison of the Mental Powers of Man and the Lower Animals 73 CHAPTER IV. Comparison of the Mental Powers of Man and the Lower Animals continued 110 CHAPTER V. On the Development of the Intellectual and Moral Faculties During Primeval and Civilized Times 144 CHAPTER VI. On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man 166 CHAPTER VIL On the Races of Man. . . .189 fi CONTENTS. PART II. SEXUAL SELECTION. CHAPTER VHL Principles of Sexual Selection 234 CHAPTER IX. Secondary Sexual Characters in the Lower Classes of the Ani- mal Kingdom 294 CHAPTER X. Secondary Sexual Characters of Insects 811 CHAPTER XI. Insects, continued Order Lepidoptera. Butterflies and Moths. 348 CHAPTER XII. Secondary Sexual Characters of Fishes, Amphibians, and Reptiles 375 CHAPTER XHL Secondary Sexual Characters of Birds 407 CHAPTER XIV. Birds continued 459 CHAPTER XV. Birds continued 505 CHAPTER XVI. Birds concluded 628 CHAPTER XVTI. Secondary Sexual Characters of Mammals 570 CONTENTS. Tii CHAPTER XVIII. PAOI. Secondary Sexual Characters of Mammals continued 600 PART III. SEXUAL SELECTION IN KELATION TO MAN, AND CONCLUSION. CHAPTER XIX. Secondary Sexual Characters of Man , 684 CHAPTER XX. Secondary Sexual Characters of Man continued. 668 CHAPTER YXT. General Summary and Conclusion 693 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE 709 INDEX , 715 THE DESCENT OF MAN; AND SELECTION IN RELATION TO SEX. INTRODUCTION. THE nature of the following work will be best understood by a brief account of how it came to be written. During many years I collected notes on the origin or descent of man, without any intention of publishing on the subject, but rather with the determination not to publish, as I thought that I should thus only add to the prejudices against my views. It seemed to me sufficient to indicate, in the first edition of my " Origin of Species," that by this work " light would be thrown on the origin of man and his history;" and this implies that man must be included with other organic beings in any general conclusion respecting his manner of appearance on this earth. Now the case wears a wholly different aspect. When a naturalist like Carl Vogt ventures to say in his address as President of the National Institution of Geneva (1869), " personne, en Europe au moins, n'ose plus soutenir la creation independ- ante et de toutes pieces, des especes," it is manifest that at least a large number of naturalists must admit that species are the modified descendants of other species; and this es- pecially holds good with the younger and rising naturalists. The greater number accept the agency of natural selection; though some urge, whether with justice the future must decide, that I have greatly overrated its importance. Of the older and honored chiefs in natural science, many un- fortunately are still opposed to evolution in every form. In consequence of the views now adopted by most natu- ralists, and which will ultimately, as in every other case, be 2 THE DESCENT OF MAN. followed by others who are not scientific, I have been led to put together my notes, SQ as to see how far the general con- clusions arrived at in my former works were applicable to man. This seemed all the more desirable, as I had never deliberately applied these views to a species taken singly. When we confine our attention to any one form, we are de- prived of the weighty arguments derived from the nature of the affinities which connect together whole groups of organisms their geographical distribution in past and pres- ent times, and their geological succession. The homologi- cal structure, embryo-logical development, and rudimentary organs of a species remain to be considered, whether it be man or any other animal, to which our attention may be directed; but these great classes of facts afford, as it ap- pears to me, ample and conclusive evidence in favor of the principle of gradual evolution. The strong support derived from the other arguments should, however, always be kept ' sfore the mind. The sole object of this work is to consider, firstly, whether man, like every other species, is descended from ^some pre-existing form; secondly, the manner of his devel- opment; and thirdly, the value of the differences between the so-called races of man. As I shall confine myself to these points, it will not be necessary to describe in detail the differences between the several races an enormous sub- ject which has been fully discussed in many valuable works. The high antiquity of man has recently been demonstrated by the labors of a host of eminent men, beginning with M. Boucher de Perthes; and this is the indispensable basis for understanding his origin. I shall, therefore, take this conclusion for granted, and may refer my readers to the admirable treatises of Sir Charles Lyell, Sir John Lubbock, and others. Nor shall I have occasion to do more than to allude to the amount of difference between man and the anthropomorphous apes; for Prof. Huxley, in the opinion of most competent judges, has conclusively shown that in every visible character man differs less from the higher apes than these do from the lower members of the same order of Primates. This work contains hardlv any original facts in regard to man; but as the conclusions at which I arrived, after drawing up a rough draft, appeared to me interesting, I thought that they might interest others. It has often and INTRODUCTION. 3 confidently been asserted that man's origin can never be known: but ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science. The^con- clusion thatjnan jsjhe _co-iLescendant -with other species of some ancient, lower, and extinct form, is not in any degree new. Lamarck long ago came to this conclusion, which has lately been maintained.. by several eminent naturalists and philosophers; for instance, by Wallace, Huxley, Lyell, Vogt, LubboCk," Buchner, Kolle, etc.,* and especially by Hackel. This last naturalist, besides his great work, "Generelle Morphologic* (1866), has recently (1868, with a second edition in 1870), published his "NatUrliche Schopfungsgesehichte," in which he fully discusses the genealogy of man. If this work had appeared before my essay had been written, I should probably never have com- pleted it. Almost all the conclusions at which I have arrived I find confirmed by this naturalist, whose knowl- edge on many points is much fuller than mine. Wherever I have added any fact or view from Prof. HackeFs writ- ings, I give his authority in the text; other statements I leave as they originally stood in my manuscript, occasion- ally giving in the footnotes references to his works, as a confirmation of the more doubtful or interesting points. During many years it has seemed to me highly probable that sexual selection has played an important part in differentiating the races of man; but in my "Origin of Species" (first edition) I contented myself by merely alluding to this belief. When I came to apply this view to man, I found it indispensable to treat the whole *As the works of the first-named authors are so well known, I need not give the titles ; but as those of the latter are less well known in England, I will give them : " Sechs Vorlesungen iiber die Darwin'sche Theorie," zweite Auflage, 1868, von Dr. L. Buchner ; translated into French under the title " Conferences sur la Theorie Darwinienne," 1869. " Der Mensch, im Lichte der Darwin'sche Lehre," 1865, von Dr. F. Rolle. I will not attempt to give references to all the authors who have taken the same side of the question. Thus G. Canestrini has published (" Annuario della Soc. d. Nat.," Modena, 1867, p. 81), a very curious paper on rudimentary characters, as bearing on the origin of man. Another work has (1869) been published by Dr. Francesco Barrago, bearing in Italian the title of " Man, made in the image of God. was also made in tke image of the ape." 4 THE DESCENT OF MAN. subject in full detail.* Consequently, the second part of the present work, treating of sexual selection, has extended to an inordinate length, compared with the first part; but this could not be avoided. I had intended adding to the present volume an essay on the expression of the various emotions by man and the lower animals. My attention was called to this subject many years ago by Sir Charles Bell's admirable work. This illustrious anatomist maintains that man is endowed with certain muscles solely for the sake of expressing his emotions. As this view is obviously opposed to the belief that man is descended from some other and lower form, it was necessary for me to consider it. I likewise wished to ascertain how far the emotions are expressed in the same manner by the different races of man. But owing to the length of the present work, I have thought it better to re- serve my essay for separate publication. * Prof. Hackel was the only author, who, at the time when this work first appeared, had discussed the subject of sexual selection, and had seen its full importance, since the publication of the "Origin;" and this he did in a very able manner in his various works. PART I. THE DESCENT OR ORIGIN OF MAN. CHAPTER I. THE EVIDENCE OF THE DESCENT OP MAN FKOM SOME LOWER POEM. Nature of the evidence bearing 1 on the origin of man Homologous structures in man and the lower animals Miscellaneous points of correspondence Development Rudimentary structures, muscles, sense-organs, hair, bones, reproductive organs, etc. The bearing of these three great classes of facts on the origin of man. HE who wishes to decide whether man is the modified descendant of some pre-existing form, would probably first inquire whether man varies, however slightly, in bodily structure and in mental faculties; and if so, whether the variations are transmitted to his offspring in accordance with the laws which prevail with the lower animals. Again, are the variations the result, as far as our ignorance permits us to judge, of the same general causes, and are they governed by the same general laws, as in the case of other organisms; for instance, by correlation, the inherited effects of use and disuse, etc. ? Is man subject to similar malcon- f prmations, the result of arrested development, of reduplica- tion of parts, etc., and does he display in any of his anoma- lies reversion to some former and ancient type of structure? It might also naturally be inquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub- races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful Bpecies? How are such races distributed over the world; and how, when crossed, do they react on each other in the first and succeeding generations? And so with many other points. 6 THE DESCENT OF MAN. The inquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence ; and conse- quently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct ? We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be an- swered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals. But the several considerations just referred to may be conveniently deferred for a time : and we will first see how far the bodily structure of man shows traces, more or less plain, of his descent from some lower form. In succeeding chapters the mental poAvers of man, in com- parison with those of the lower animals, will be considered. The Bodily Structure of Man. It is notorious that man is constructed on the same general type or model as other mammals. All the bones in his skeleton can be compared with corresponding bones in a monkey, bat, or seal. So it is with his muscles, nerves, blood-vessels, and internal vis- cera. The brain, the most important of all the organs, follows the same law, as shown by Huxley and other anato- mists. Bischoff,* who is a hostile witness, admits that every chief fissure and fold in the brain of man has its analogy in that of the orang ; but he adds that at no period of de- velopment do their brains perfectly agree ; nor could per- fect agreement be expected, for otherwise their mental pow- ers would have been the same. Vulpianf remarks : " Les differences reelles qui existent entre Fencephale de 1'homme et celui des singes superieurs, sont bein minimes. II ne faut pas se faire d'illusions a cet egard. L'homme est bein plus pres des singes anthropomorphes par les caracteres anatomiques de son cerveau que ceux-ci ne le sont non seul- ement des autres mammif res, mais me'me de certains quad- rumanes, des guenons et des macaques." But it would be * " Grosshirnwindungen des Menschen," -1868, s. 96. The con-- elusions of this author, as well as those of Gratiolet and Aeby, con- cerning the brain, will be discussed by Prof. Huxley in the Appendix alluded to in the Preface to this edition. f'Lec. sur la Phys.," 1866, p. 890, as quoted by M. Dally, " L'Ordre des Primates et le Transformisme," 1868, p. 29. HOMOLOGICAL STRUCTURES. 7 superfluous here to give further details on the correspond- ence between man and the higher mammels in the structure of the brain and all other parts of the body. It may, however, be worth while to specify a few points, not directly or obviously connected with structure, by which this correspondence or relationship is well shown. Man is liable to receive from the lower animals, and to communicate to them, certain diseases, as hydrophobia, variola, the glanders, syphilis, cholera, herpes, etc. ;* and this fact proves the close similarity! of their tissues and blood, both in minute structure and composition, far more plainly than does their comparison under the best micro- scope, or by the aid of the best chemical analysis. Mon- keys are liable to many of the same non-contagious diseases as we are; thus Eengger, J who carefully observed for a long time the Cebus Azarce in its native land, found it liable to catarrh, with the usual symptoms, and which, when often recurrent, led to consumption. These monkeys suffered also from apoplexy, inflammation of the bowels, and cata- ract in the eye. The younger ones when shedding their milk-teeth often died from fever. Medicines produced the same effect on them as on us. Many kinds of monkeys have a strong taste for tea, coffee, and spirituous liquors : they will also, as I have myself seen, smoke tobacco with pleasure. Brehm asserts that the natives of north-eastern Africa catch the wild baboons by exposing vessels with strong beer, by which they are made drunk. He has seen some of these animals, which he kept in confinement, in * Dr. W. Lauder Lindsay has treated this subject at some length in the "Journal of Mental'Science," July, 1871; and in the "Edin- burgh Veterinary Review," July, 1858. f A Reviewer has criticised ("British Quarterly Review," Oct. 1, 1871, p. 472) what I have here said with much severity and contempt ; but as I do not use the term identity, I cannot see that I am greatly in error. There appears to me a strong analogy between the same infection or contagion producing the same result, or one closely simi- lar, in two distinct animals, Lfld the testing of two distinct fluids by the same chemical reagent. J " Naturgeschichte der Saugethiere von Paraguay," 1830, s. 50. The same tastes are common to some animals much lower in the scale. Mr. A. Nichols informs me that he kept in Queensland, in Australia, three individuals of the Phaseolarctus cinereus ; and that, without having been taught in any way, they acquired a strong taste for rum and smoking tobacco. 8 THE DESCENT OF MAN. this state; and ha gives a laughable account of their behav- ior and strange grimaces.' 1 On the following morning they were very cross and dismal; they held their aching heads with both hands, and wore a most pitiable expression; when beer or wine was offered them, they turned away with dis- gust, but relished the juice of lemons.* An American monkey, an Ateles, after getting drunk on brandy, would never touch it again, and thus was wiser than many men. These trifling facts prove how similar the nerves of taste must oe in monkeys and man, and how similarly their whole nervous system is affected. Man is infested with internal parasites, sometimes causing fatal effects; and is plagued by external parasites, all of which belong to the same genera or families as those infest- ing other mammals, and in the case of scabies to the same species, f Man is subject, like other mammals, birds, and even insects, J to that mysterious law, which causes certain normal processes, such as gestation, as well as the matura- tion and duration of various diseases, to follow lunar periods. His wounds are repaired by the same process of healing; and the stumps left after the amputation of his limbs, es- pecially during an early embryonic period, occasionally possess some power of regeneration, as in the lowest animals. The whole process of that most important function, the reproduction of the species, is strikingly the same in all mammals, from the first act of courtship by the male, | to *Brehm, " Thierleben," B. i, 1864, 8.75, 86. On the Ateles, s. 105. For other analogous statements, see s. 25, 107. f Dr. W. Lauder Lindsay, " Edinburgh Veterinary Review," July, 1858, p. 13. \ With respect to insects see Dr. Laycock " On a General Law of Vital Periodicity," "British Association," 1842. Dr. Macculloch, " Silliman's North American Journal of Science," vol. xvii, p. 305, has seen a dog suffering from tertian ague. Hereafter I shall return to this subject. 1 have given the evidence on this head in my "Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, p. 15, aud more could be added. J Mares e diversis generibus Quadrumanorum sine dubio dignos- cunt feminas humanas a maribus. Primurn, credo, odoratu, postea aspectu. Mr. Youatt, qui diu in Hortis Zoologicis (Bestiariis) medi- cus animalium erat, vir in rebus observandis cautus et sagax, hoc mihi certissime probavit, et curatores ejusdeui loci et alii e ministris confirm* verunt. Sir Andrew Smith et Brehm notabant idem in Cyuo HOMOLOGICAL STEVCTVUEh. 9 the birth and nurturing of the young. Monkeys are born in almost as helpless a condition as our own infants; and in certain genera the young differ fully as much in appearance from the adults, as do our children from their full-grown parents.* It has been urged by some writers, as an import- ant distinction, that with man the young arrive at maturity at a much later age than with any. other animal: but if we look to the races of mankind which inhabit tropical coun- tries the difference is not great, for the orang is believed not to be adult till the age of from ten to fifteen years, f Man differs from woman in size, bodily strength, hairiness, etc. , as well as in mind, in the same manner as do the two sexes of many mammals. So that the correspondence in general structure, in the minute structure of the tissues, in chemical composition and in constitution, between man and the higher animals, especially the anthropomorphous apes, is extremely close. Embryonic Development. Man is developed from an ovule, about the 125th of an inch in diameter, which differs in no respect from the ovules of other animals. The embryo itself at a very early period can hardly be distin- guished from that of other members of the vertebrate king- dom. At this period the arteries run in arch-like branches, as if to carry the blood to branchiae which are not present in the higher vertebrata, though the slits on the sides of the neck still remain (/, g, fig. 1), marking their former posi- tion. At a somewhat later period, when the extremities are developed, "the feet of lizards and mammals," as the illustrious Von Baer remarks, "the wings and feet of birds, no less than the hands and feet of man, all arise from the same fundamental form/' It is, says Prof. Huxley, J ceplialo. Illustrissimus Cuvier etiam narrat multa de Me re, qua" ut opinor, nihil turpius potest indicari inter oninia borninibus et Quadrumanis communia. Narrat enim Cynocepbaluin quendam in f urorem incidere aspectu feuiinarum aliquaruin, sed nequaquam ac- cendi tanto furore ab omnibus. Semper eligebat juniores, et dignos- cebat in turba, et advocabat voce gestuque. *Tbis remark is made with respect to Cynocephalus and tbe antbropomorpbous apes by Geoffrey Saint-Hilaire and F. Cuvier, " Hist. Nat. des Mammiferes," torn, i, 1824. f Huxley, " Man's Place in Nature." 1863, p. 34. J ibid., p. 67. 10 THE DESCENT OF MAN. " quite in the later stages of development that the young human being presents marked differences from the young ape, while the latter departs as much from the dog in its developments as the man does. Startling as this last asser- tion may appear to be, it is demonstrably true." As some of my readers may never have seen a drawing of an embryo, I have given one of man and another of a dog, at about the same early stage of development, carefully copied from two works of undoubted accuracy,* After the foregoing statements made by such high authorities, it would be superfluous on my part to give a number of borrowed details, showing that the embryo of man closely resembles that of other mammals. It may, however, be added, that the human embryo likewise resem- bles certain low forms when adult in various points of structure. For instance, the heart at first exists as a simple pulsating vessel ; the excreta are voided through a cloacal passage ; and the os coccyx projects like a true tail, " ex- tending considerably beyond the rudimentary legs."f In the embryos of all air-breathing vertebrates, certain glands, called the corpora "Wolffiana, correspond with, and act like the kidneys of mature fishes. J Even at a later embryonic period, some striking resemblances between man and the lower animals may be observed. BischofE says that "the convolutions of the brain in a human fo3tus at the end of the seventh month reach about the same stage of development as in a baboon when adult. " The great toe, as Prof. Owen remarks, | " which forms the fulcrum when standing or walking, is perhaps *The human embryo (upper fig.) is from Ecker, " Icones Phys.," 1851-1859, tab. xxx, fig. 2. This embryo was ten lines in length, so that the drawing is much magnified. The embryo of the dog is from Bischoff, " Entwicklungsgeschichte des Hunde-Eies," 1845, tab. xi, fig. 42 B. This drawing is five times magnified, the embryo being twenty-five days old. The internal viscer: have been omitted, and the uterine appendages in both drawings removed. I was directed to these figures by Prof. Huxley, from whose work, " Man's Place in Nature," the idea of giving them was taken. Hackel has also given analogous drawings in his " Scho'pfungsgeschichte." fProf. Wyman in " Proc. of American Acad. of Sciences," vol. iv, I860, p. 17. JO wen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. i, p. 583. "Die Qrosshirnwindungen des Menschen." 1868, s. 95. U "Anatomy of Vertebrates." vpl. ii, p. 553. HOMOLOGICAL STRUCTURES. 11 Jiff. 1. Upper figure human embryo, from Ecker. Lower figure that of a dog, from BischofE. a. Fore-brain, cerebral hemispheres, etc. b. Mid-brain, corpora quadrigemina. c. Hind-brain, cerebellum, medulla oblongata, d. Eye. . Ear. f. First visceral arch. ff. Second visceral arch. H. Vertebral columns and muscles in process of development. . L. Tail or os coccyx. 12 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the most characteristic peculiarity in the human struct, ure;" but in an embryo, about an inch in length, Prof. Wyman* found "that the great toe was shorter than the others; and, instead of being parallel to them, projected at an angle from the side of the foot, thus corresponding with the permanent condition of this part in the quadrumana." I will conclude with a quotation from Huxley, f who after asking, does man originate in a different way from a dog, bird, frog, or fish? says, "the reply is not doubtful for a moment; without question, the mode of origin, and the early stages of the development of man, are identical with those of the animals immediately below him in the scale: without a doubt in these respects he is far nearer to apes than the apes are to the dog." Rudiments. This subject, though not intrinsically more important than the two last, will for several reasons be treated here more fully. J Not one of the higher animals can be named which does not bear some part in a rudi- mentary condition; and man forms no exception to the rule. Rudimentary organs must be distinguished from those that are nascent; though in some cases the distinction is not eas} r . The former are either absolutely useless, such as the mammae of male quadrupeds, or the incisor teeth of ruminants, which never cut through the gums; or they are of such slight service to their present possessors, that we can hardly suppose that they were developed under the conditions which now exist. Organs in this latter state are not strictly rudimentary, but they are tending in this direction. Nascent organs, on the other hand, though not fully devel- oped, are of high service to their possessors, and are capa- ble of further development. Rudimentary organs are eminently variable; and this is partly intelligible, as they are useless, or nearly useless, and consequently are no * " Proc. Soc. Nat. Hist.," Boston 1863, vol. ix, p. 185. f "Man's Place in Nature," p. 65. I had written a rough copy of this chapter before reading a valu- able paper, " Caratteri rudimentali in ordine all" origine dell' uomo" (" Annuario della Soc. d. Nat.," Modena, 1867, p. 81), by G. Canes- trini, to which paper I am considerably indebted. Hackel has given admirable discussions on this whole subject, under the title of Dys- teleology, in his " Generelle Morphologic" and " Scho'pf ungsge- schichte." RUDIMENTS. 13 longer subjected to natural selection. They often become wholly suppressed. When this occurs, they are neverthe- less liable to occasional reappearance through reversion a circumstance well worthy of attention. The chief agents in causing organs to become rudiment- ary seem to have been disuse at that period of life when the organ is chiefly used (and this is generally during matu- rity), and also inheritance at a corresponding period of life. The term "disuse" does not relate merely to the lessened action of muscles, but includes a diminished flow of blood to a part or organ, from being subjected to fewer alterna- tions of pressure, or from becoming in any way less habitu- ally active. Rudiments, however, may occur in one sex of those parts which are normally present in the other sex; and such rudiments, as we shall hereafter see, have often originated in a way distinct from those here referred to. In some cases, organs have been reduced by means of nat- ural selection, from having become injurious to the species under changed habits of life. The process of reduction is probably often aided through the two principles of com- pensation and economy of growth; but the later stages of reduction, after disuse has done all that can fairly be at- tributed to it, and when the saving to be effected by the economy of growth would be very small,* are difficult to understand. The final and complete suppression of a part, already useless and much reduced in size, in which case neither compensation nor economy come into play, is perhaps intelligible by the aid of the hypothesis of pangene^ sis. But as the whole subject of rudimentary organs has been discussed and illustrated in my former works, f I need here say no more on this head. Eudiments of various muscles have been observed in many parts of the human body ;| and not a few muscles, * Some good criticisms on this subject have been given by Messrs. Murie and Mivart, in "Transact. Zoolog. Soc.," 1869, vol. vii, p. 92. f " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, pp. 317 and 397. See also "Origin of Species." JFor instance M. Richard (" Annales des Sciences Nat., 3d series, Zoolog., 1852, torn, xviii, p. 13) describes and figures rudiments of what he calls the " muscle pedieux de la main," which he says is sometimes " infiniment petit." Another muscle, called " le tibial posterieur," is generally quite absent in the hand, but appears from time to time in a more or less rudimentary condition. 14 THE DESCENT OF MAN, which are regularly present in some of the lower animals, can occasionally be detectedjn man in a greatly reduced con- dition. Every one must have noticed the power which many animals, especially horses, possess of moving or twitching their skin ; and this is effected by the panniculus carnosus. Remnants of this muscle in an efficient state are found in various parts of pur bodies ; for instance, the muscle on the forehead, by which the eyebrows are raised. The platysma myoides, which is well developed on the neck, belongs to this system. Prof. Turner, of Edinburgh, has occa- sionally detected, as he informs me, muscular fasciculi in five different situations, namely in the axillae, near the scapulae, etc., all of which must be referred to the system of the panniculus. He has also shown* that the musculus sternalis or sternalis brutorum, which is not an extension of the rectus abdominalis, but is closely allied to the pan- niculus, occurred in the proportion of about three per cent. in upwards of 600 bodies ; he adds, that this muscle affords " an excellent illustration of the statement that occasional and rudimentary structures are especially liable to variation in arrangement. " Some few persons have the power of contracting the superficial, muscles on their scalps ; and these muscles are in a variable and partially rudimentary condition. M. A. de Candolle has communicated to me a curious instance of the long-continued persistence or inheritance of this power, as well as of its unusual development. He knows a family, in which one member, the present head of the family, could, when a youth, pitch several heavy books from his head by the movement of the scalp alone ; and he won wagers by performing this feat. His father, uncle, grand- father, and his three children possess the same power to the .same unusual degree. This family became divided eight generations ago into two branches ; so that the head of the above-mentioned branch is cousin in the seventh degree to the head of the other branch. This distant cousin resides in another part of France ; and on being asked whether he possessed the same faculty, immediately exhibited his power. This case offers a good illustration how persistent may be the transmission of an absolutely useless faculty, probably derived from our remote semi-human progenitors; Prof. W Turner, " Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh," 1866-67, p. 66. RUDIMENTS. 15 since many monkeys have, and frequently use the power, of largely moving their scalps up and down. * The extrinsic muscles which serve to move the external ear, and the intrinsic muscles which move the different parts, are in a rudimentary condition in man, and they all belong to the system of the panniculus; they are also vari- able in development, or at least in function. I have seen one man who could draw the whole ear forward; other men can draw it upward; another who could draw it backward;! and from what one of these persons told me, it is probable that most of us, by often touching our ears, and thus directing our attention toward them, could recover some power of movement by repeated trials. The power of erect- ing and directing the shell of the ears to the various points of the compass, is no doubt of the highest service to many animals, as they thus perceive the direction of danger; but I have never heard, on sufficient evidence, of a man who possessed this power, the one which might be of use to him. The whole external shell may be considered a rudiment, to- gether with the various folds and prominences (helix and anti-helix, tragus, and anti-tragus, etc.) which in the lower animals strengthen and support the ear when erect, with- out adding much to its weight. Some authors, however, suppose that the cartilage of the shell serves to transmit vibrations to the acoustic nerve; but Mr. Toynbee,J after collecting all the known evidence on this head, concludes that the external shell is of no distinct use. The ears of the chimpanzee and orang are curiously like those of man, and the proper muscles are likewise but very slightly developed. I am also assured by the keepers in the Zoological Gardens that these animals never move or erect their ears; so that they are in an equally rudimentary condi- tion with those of man, as far as function is concerned. * See iny "Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals," 1872, p. 144. j- Canestrini quotes Hyrtl. ("Annuario della Soc. dei Naturalist!," Modena, 1867, p. 97) to the same effect. J "The Diseases of the Ear," by J. Toynbee, F. R. S., 1860, p. 12. A distinguished physiologist, Prof. Prey'er, informs me that he had lately been experimenting on the function of the shell of the ear, and has come to nearly the same conclusion as that given here. ^Prof. A. Macalister, "Annals and Mag. of Nat. History," voL vii, 1871, p. 343. 16 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Why these animals, as well as the progenitors of man, should have lost the power, of erecting their ears, we cannot say. It may be, though I am not satisfied with this view, that owing to their arboreal habits and great strength they were but little exposed to danger, and so during a length- ened period moved their ears but little, and thus gradually lost the power of moving them. This would be a parallel case with that of those large and heavy birds, which, from inhabiting oceanic islands, have not been exposed to the attacks of beasts of prey, and have consequently lost the power of using their wings for flight. The inability to move the ears in man and several apes is, however, partly compensated by the freedom with which they can move the head in a horizontal plane, so as to catch sounds from all directions. It has been asserted that the ear of man alone possesses a lobule; but "a, rudiment of it is found in the gorilla;"* and, as I hear from Prof. Preyer, it is not rarely absent in the negro. The celebrated sculptor, Mr. Woollier, informs me of one little peculiarity in the external ear, which he has often observed both in men and women, and of which he per- ceived the full significance. His attention was first called to the subject while at work on his figure of Puck, to which he had given pointed ears. He was thus led to ex- amine the ears of various monkeys, and subsequently more carefully those of man. The peculiarity consists in a little blunt point, projecting from the inwardly folded margin, or helix. When present, it is developed at birth, and, ac- cording to Prof. Ludwig Meyer, more frequently in man than in woman. Mr. Woolner made an exact model of one such case, and sent me the accompanying drawing. (Fig. 2. ) These points not only project inward toward the center of the ear, but of ten a little outward from its plane, so as to be visible when the head is viewed from directly in front or behind. They are variable in size, and somewhat in position, standing either a little higher or lower ; and they sometimes occur on one ear and not on the other. They are not con- fined to mankind, for I observed a case in one of the spider- monkeys (A teles Beelzebuth) in our Zoological Gardens; and Mr. E. Ray Lankester informs me of another case jn a chimpanzee in the gardens at Hamburg. The helix ob- *Mr. St. George Mivart, " Elementary Anatomy," 1873, p. 396. RUDIMENTS. viously consists of the extreme margin of the ear folded inward ; and this folding appears to be in some manner connected with the whole external ear being permanently pressed backward. In many monkeys, which do not stand high in the order, as baboons and some species of Macacus,* the upper portion of the ear is slightly pointed, and the margin is not at all folded inward ; but if the margin were, to be thus folded, a slight point would necessarily project inward toward the center, and probably a little outward from the plane of the ear ; and this I believe to be their origin in many cases. On the other hand, Prof * L. Meyer, in an able paper recently published,! maintains that the whole case is one of mere variability; and that the projections are not real ones, but are due to the internal cartilage on each side of the points not having been fully developed. I am quite ready to admit that this is the correct explanation in many in- stances, as in those figured by Prof. Meyer, in which there are several minute points, or the whole margin is sinuous. I have myself seen, through the kindness of Dr. L. Down, the ear of a microcephalous idiot, on which there is a projection on the outside of the helix, and not on the inward folded edge, so that this point can have no relation to a former apex of the ear. Nevertheless in some cases, my original view, that the points are vestiges of the tips of formerly erect and pointed ears, still seems to me probable. I think so from the frequency of their occurrence, and from the general correspondence in position with that of the tip of a pointed ear. In one case, of which a photograph has been sent me, the projection is so large, that supposing, in ac- cordance with Prof. Meyer's view, the ear to be made per- See also some remarks, and the drawings of the ears of the Lem- uroidea, in Messrs, Murie and Mivart's excellent paper in "Transact. Zoolog. Soc.," vol. vii, 1869, pp. 6 and 90. f Ueber das Darwin'sche Spitzolu- "Archiv filr Path. Anat. imd Phys.," 1871, p. 485. Fig. 2. Human Ear, mod- eled and drawn by Mr. Woolner. a. The projecting point. 18 THE DESCENT OF MAN. feet by the equal development of the cartilage throughout the whole extent of the margin, it would have covered fully one-third of the whole eaV. Two cases have been commu- nicated to me, one in North America and the other in England, in which the upper margin is not at all folded inward, but is pointed, so that it closely resembles the pointed ear of an ordinary quadruped in outline. In one of these cases, which was that of a young child, the father compared the ear with the drawing which I have given* of Kg. 3. Foetus of an Orang. Exact copy of a photograph, showing the form of the ear at this early age. the ear of a monkey, the CynopUhecus niger, and says that their outlines are closely similar. If, in these two cases, the margin had been folded inward in the normal manner, an inward projection must have been formed. I may add that in two other cases the outline still remains somewhat pointed, although the margin of the upper part of the ear is normally folded inward in one of them, however, very narrowly. The above wood-cut (Fig. 3) is an accurate copy of a photograph of the fretus of an orang (kindly sent me by Dr. Nitsche), in which it may be seen how different the pointed outline of the ear is at this period from ita adult condition, when it bears a close general resemblance *"The Expression of trie Emotions/' p. 136. RUDIMENTS. 19 to that of man. It is evident that the folding over of the tip of such an ear, unless it changed greatly during its further development, would give rise to a point projecting inward. On the whole, it still seems to me probable that the points in question are in some cases, both in man and apes, vestiges of a former condition. The nictitating membrane, or third eyelid, with its ac- cessory muscles and other structures, is especially well developed in birds, and is of much functional importance to them, as it can be rapidly drawn across the whole eye- ball. It is found in some reptiles and amphibians, and in certain fishes, as in sharks. It is fairly well developed in the two lower divisions of the mammalian series, namely, in the monotremata and marsupials, and in some few of the higher mammals, as in the walrus. But in man, the quadrumana, and most other mammals, it exists, as is ad- mitted by all anatomists, as a mere rudiment, called the semilunar fold.* The sense of smell is of the highest importance to the greater number of mammals to some, as the ruminants, in warning them of danger; to others, as the carnivora, in finding their prey; to others, again, as the wild boar, for both purposes combined. But the sense of smell is of extremely slight service, if any, even to the dark colored races of men, in whom it is much more highly developed than in the white and civilized races, f Nevertheless it does not warn them of danger, nor guide them to their *Muller's "Elements of Physiology," Eng. translat., 1842, vol. ii, p. 1117. Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 260; ibid, on the Walrus, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," November 8, 1854. See also R. Knox, "Great Artists and Anatomists," p. 106. This rudiment ap- parently is somewhat larger in Negroes and Australians than in Euro- peans, see Carl Vogt, " Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., p. 129. f The account given by Humboldt of the power of smell possessed by the natives of South America is well known, and has been con- firmed by others . M. Houzeau (" Etudes sur les Facultes Mentales," etc. , torn, i, 1872, p. 91) asserts that he repeatedly made experiments, and proved that Negroes and Indians could recognize persons in the dark by their odor. Dr. W. Ogle has made some curious observa- tions on the connection between the power of smell and the coloring matter of the mucous membrane of the olfactory region, as well as of ths 8kin of the body. I have, therefore, spoken in the text of the dark colored races having a finer Sense of smell than the white races. See his paper, " Medico-Chirurgical Transactions," London, vol. liii, 1870, p. 276. 20 THE DESCENT OF MAX. food; nor does it prevent the Esquimaux from sleeping in the most fetid atmosphere, nor many savages from eating half-putrid meat. In Europeans the power differs greatly in different individuals, as I am assured by an eminent naturalist who possesses this sense highly developed, and who has attended to the subject. Those who believe in the principle of gradual evolution will not readily admit that the sense of smell in its present state was originally acquired by man as he now exists. He inherits the power in an enfeebled and so far rudimentary condition, from some early progenitor to whom it was highly serviceable, and by whom it was continually used. In those animals which have this sense highly developed, such as dogs and horses, the recollection of persons and of places is strongly associ- ated with their odor; and we can thus perhaps understand how it is, as Dr. Maudsley has truly remarked,* that the sense of smell in man "is singularly effective in recalling vividly the ideas and images of forgotten scenes and places." Man differs conspicuously from all the other Primates in being almost naked. But a few short straggling hairs are found over the greater part of the body in the man, and fine down on that of the woman. The different races differ much in hairiness; and in the individuals of the same race the hairs are highly variable, not only in abundance, but likewise in position; thus in some Europeans the shoulders are quite naked, while in others they bear thick tufts of hair, f There can be little doubt that the hairs thus scat- tered over the body are the rudiments of the uniform hairy coat of the lower animals. This view is rendered all the more probable, as it is known that fine, short, and pale- colored hairs on the limbs and other parts of the body, occasionally become developed into "thickset, long, and rather coarse dark hairs/' when abnormally nourished near old-standing inflamed surfaces. J I am informed by Sir James Paget that often several members of a family have a few hairs in their eyebrows much longer than the others; so that even this slight * " The Physiology and Pathology of Mind," 2d edit., 1868, p. 134. f Eschricht, Ueber die Richtung der Haare am raenschlichen KCr- per, "Muller's Archiv fiir Anat. nnd Phys.," 1837, s. 47. I shall often have to refer to this very curious paper. J Paget, "Lectures on Surgical Pathology," 1853, vol. i, p. 71. RUDIMENTS. 21 peculiarity seems to be inherited. These hairs, too, seem to have their representatives; for in the chimpanzee, and in certain species of Macacus, there are scattered hairs of con- siderable length rising from the naked skin above the eyes, and corresponding to our eyebrows; similar long hairs pro- ject from the hairy covering of the superciliary ridges in Borne baboons. The fine \vool-like hair, or so-called lanugo, with which the human foetus during the sixth month is thickly cov- ered, offers a more curious case. It is first developed, dur- ing the fifth month, on the eyebrows and face, and espe- cially round the mouth, where it is much longer than that on the head. A mustache of this kind was observed by Eschricht* on a female foetus; but this is not so surprising a circumstance as it may at first appear, for the two sexes generally resemble each other in all external characters during an early period of growth. The direction and arrangement of the hairs on all parts of the foetal body are the same as in the adult, but are subject to much varia- bility. The whole surface, including even the forehead and ears, is thus thickly clothed; but it is a significant fact that the palms of the hands and the soles of the feet are quite naked, like the inferior surfaces of all four extremi- ties in most of the lower animals. As this can hardly be an accidental coincidence, the woolly covering of the foetus probably represents the first permanent coat of hair in those mammals which are born hairy. Three or four cases have been recorded of persons born with their whole bodies and faces thickly covered with fine long hairs; and this strange condition is strongly inherited, and is correlated with an abnormal condition of the teeth, f Prof. Alex. Brandt in- forms me that he has compared the hair from the face of a man thus characterized, aged thirty-five, with the lanugo of a foetus, and finds it quite similar in texture; therefore, as he remarks, the case may be attributed to an arrest of development in the hair, together with its continued growth. Many delicate children, as I have been assured by a surgeon to a hospital for children, have their backs *Eschricht, ibid., s. 40, 47. f See my " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,** vol. ii, p. 327, Prof. Alex. Brandt has recently sent me an additional case of a father and son, born in Russia, with these peculiarities. I tave receiver] drawings of both from Pans. 22 THE DESCENT OF MAN. covered by rather long silky hairs; and such cases probably come under the same head. It appears as if the posterior molar or wisdom teeth were tending to become rudimentary in the more civilized races of man. These teeth are rather smaller than the other molars, as is likewise the case with the corresponding teeth in the chimpanzee and orang; and they have only two separate fangs. They do not cut through the gums till about the seventeenth year, and I have been assured that they are much more liable to decay, and are earlier lost than the other teeth; but this is denied by some eminent dentists. They are also much more liable to vary, both in structure and in the period of their development, than the other teeth.* In the Melanian races, on the other hand, the wisdom teeth are usually furnished with three separate fangs, and are generally sound; they also differ from the other molars in size, less than in the Caucasian races, f Prof. Schaaffhausen accounts for this difference between the races by " the posterior dental portion of the jaw being always shortened" in those that are civilized, | and this shortening may, I presume, be attributed to civilized men habitually feeding on soft, cooked food, and thus using their jaws less. I am informed by Mr. Brace that it is becoming quite a common practice in the United States to remove some of the molar teeth of children, as the jaw does not grow large enough for the perfect development of the normal number. With respect to the alimentary canal, I have met with an account of only a single rudiment, namely the vermiform appendage of the cascum. The caecum is a branch or diver- ticulum of the intestine, ending in a cul-de-sac, and is ex- tremely long in many of the lower vegetable-feeding mam- * Dr. Webb, "Teeth in Man and the Anthropoid Apes," as quoted by Dr. C. Carter Blake in "Anthropological Review," July, 1867, p. 299. fOwen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, pp. 320, 321 and 325. j " On the Primitive Form of the Skull," Eng. translat. in" Anthrop- ological Review," Oct. 1868, p. 426. Prof. Montegazza writes to me from Florence, that he has lately been studying the last molar teeth in the different races of man, and has come to the same conclusion as that given in my test, viz. : that in the higher or civilized races they are on the road toward atrophy or elimination. RUDIMENTS. 23 mals. In the marsupial koala it is actually more than thrice as long as the whole body.* It is sometimes produced into a long gradually tapering point, and is sometimes con- stricted in parts. It appears as if, in consequence of changed diet or habits, the caecum had become much short- ened in various animals, the vermiform appendage being left as a rudiment of the shortened part. That this ap- pendage is a rudiment, we may infer from its small size, and from the evidence which Prof. Canestrini f has collected of its variability in man. It is occasionally quite absent, or again is largely developed. The passage is sometimes completely closed for half or two-thirds of its length, with the terminal part consisting of a flattened solid expansion. In the orang this appendage is long and convoluted : in man it arises from the end of the short caecum, and is commonly from four to five inches in length, being only about the third of an inch in diameter. Not only is it useless, but it is some- times the cause of death, of which fact I have lately heard two instances : this is due to small hard bodies, such as seeds, entering the passage, and causing inflammation. J In some of the lower Quadrumana, in the Lemuridae and Carnivora, as well as in many marsupials, there is a pas- sage near the lower end of the humerus, called the supra- condyloid foramen, through which the great nerve of the fore limb and often the great artery pass. Now in the humerus of man, there is generally a trace of this passage, which is sometimes fairly well developed, being formed by a depending hook-like process of bone, completed by a band of ligament. Dr. Struthers, who has closely attended to the subject, has now shown that this peculiarity is some- times inherited, as it has occurred in a father, and in no less * Owen, " Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, pp. 416, 434, 441. f'Annuario della Soc. d. Nat.," Modena, 1867, p, 94. JM. C. Martins ("De I'Unite Organique," in "Revue des Deux Mondes," June 15, 1862, p. 16), and Hackel (" Generslle Morpholo- gic," B. ii, s. 278), have both remarked on the singular fact of this rudiment sometimes causing death. With respect to inheritance, see Dr. Struthers in tli "Lancet," Feb. 15, 1873, and another important paper, ibid., Jan. 84, 1863, p. 83. Dr. Knox, as I am informed, was the first anatomist who drew attention to this peculiar structure in man ; see his ' ' Great Artists and Anatomists," p. 63. See also an important memoir on this pro- cess by Dr. Gruber, in the " Bulletin de 1'Acad. Imp. de St. PSters- bourg," torn, zii, 1867, p. 448- 24 THE DESCENT OF MAN. than four out of his seven children. When present, the great nerve invariably passes through it ; and this clearly indicates that it is the homologue and rudiment of the supra-condyloid foramen of the lower animals. Prof. Turner estimates, as he informs me, that it occurs in about one per cent, of recent skeletons. But if the occasional development of this structure in man is, as seems probable, due to reversion, it is a return to a very ancient state of things, because in the higher Quadrumana it is absent. There is another foramen or perforation in the humeras, occasionally present in man, which may be called the inter- condyloid. This occurs, but not constantly, in various an- thropoid and other apes,* and likewise in many of the lower animals. It is remarkable that this perforation seems to have been present in man much more frequently during ancient times than recently. Mr. Buskf has collected the following evidence on this head: Prof. Broca "noticed the perforation in four and a half per cent, of the arm-bones collected in the ' Cimetiere du Sud/ at Paris; and in the Grotto of Orrony, the contents of which are referred to the Bronze period, as many as eight humeri out of thirty-two were perforated ; but this extraordinary proportion, he thinks, might be due to the cavern having been a sort of 'family vault/ Again, M. Dupont found thirty per cent, of perforated bones in the caves of the Valley of the Lesse, belonging to the Keindeer period; while M. Leguay, in a sort of dolmen at Argenteuil, observed twenty-five per cent, to be perforated; and M. Pruner-Bey found twenty-six per cent, in the same condition in bones from Vaureal. Nor should it be left unnoticed that M. Pruner-Bey states that this condition is common in Gruanche skeletons." It is an interesting fact that ancient races, in this and several other cases, more frequently present structures which resemble those of the lower animals than do the modern. One chief cause seems to be that the ancient races stand somewhat *Mr. St. George Mivart, "Transact. Pliil. Soc.," 1867, p. 310. \" On the Caves of Gibraltar," "Transact. Internat. Congress of Prehist. Arch." Third Session, 1869, p. 159. Prof. Wyrnan has lately shown (Fourth Annual Report, Peabody Museum, 1871, p. 20), that this perforation is present in thirty-one per cent, of some human re- mains from ancient mounds in the Western United States, and in Florida. It frequently occurs in the negro. RUDIMENTS. 25 nearer in the long line of descent to their remote animal- like progenitors. In man, the os coccyx, together with certain other verte- brae hereafter to be described, though functionless as a tail, plainly represent this part in other vertebrate animals. At an early embryonic period it is free, and projects beyond the lower extremities; as may be seen in the drawing (Fig. 1) of a human embryo. Even after birth it has been known, in certain rare and anomalous cases,* to form a small ex- ternal rudiment of a tail. The os coccyx is short, usually including only four vertebras, all anchylosed together; and these are in a rudimentary condition, for they consist, with the exception of the basal one, of the centrum alone.f They are furnished with some small muscles; one of which, as I am informed by Prof. Turner, has been expressly de- scribed by Theile as a rudimentary repetition of the exten- sor of the tail, a muscle which is so largely developed in many mammals. The spinal cord in man extends only as far downward as the last dorsal or first lumbar vertebra; but a thread-like structure (the filum terminate) runs down the axis of the sacral part of the spinal canal, and even along the back of the coccygeal bones. The upper part of this filament, as Prof. Turner informs me, is undoubtedly homologous with the spinal cord ; but the lower part apparently consists merely of the pia mater, or vascular investing membrane. Even in this case the os coccyx may be said to possess a ves- tige of so important a structure as the spinal cord, though no longer inclosed within a bony canal. -The following fact, for which I am also indebted to Prof. Turner, shows how closely the os coccyx corresponds with the true tail in the lower animals: Luschka has recently dis- covered at the extremity of the coccygeal bones a very pe- culiar convoluted body, which is continuous with the mid- dle sacral artery; and this discovery led Krause and Meyer * Quatrefages lias lately collected the evidence on this subject. " Revue des Cours Scientifiques," 1867-1868, p. 625. In 1840 Fleisch- ruann exhibited a human foetus bearing a free tail, which, as is not always the case, included vertebral bodies; and this tail was critically examined by the many anatomists present at the meeting of natural- ists at Erlangen (see Marshall in ' ' Niederlandischen Archiv f iir Zoolo- gie," December, 1871). f Owen, "On the Nature of Iambs," 1849, p. 114. 26 TUB DESCENT OF MAN. to examine the tail of a monkey (Macacus), and of a cat, in both of which they found a similarly convoluted body, though not at the extremity. The reproductive system offers various rudimentary struct- ures; but these differ in one important respect from the foregoing cases. Here we are not concerned with the ves- tige of a part which does not belong to the species in an efficient state, but with a part efficient in the one sex, and represented in the other by a mere rudiment. Nevertheless, the occurrence of such rudiments is as diffi- cult to explain, on the belief of the separate creation of each species, as in the foregoing cases. Hereafter I shall have to recur to these rudiments, and shall show that their presence generally depends merely on inheritance, that is, on parts acquired by one sex having been partially trans- mitted to the other. I will in this place only give some in- stances of such rudiments. It is well known that in the males of all mammals, including man, rudimentary mammae exist. These in several instances have become well de- veloped, and have yielded a copious supply of milk. Their essential identity in the two sexes is likewise shown by their occasional sympathetic enlargement in both during an attack of the measles. The vesicula prostatica, which has been observed in many male mammals, is now universally acknowledged to be the liomologue of the female uterus, together with the connected passage. It is impossible to read Leuckart's able description of this organ, and his reasoning, without admitting the justness of his conclusion. This is especially clear in the case of those mammals in which the true female uterus bifurcates, for in the males of these the vesicula likewise bifurcates.* Some other rudi- mentary structures belonging to the reproductive system might have been here adduced, f The bearing of the three great classes of facts now given is unmistakable. But it would be superfluous fully to recap- itulate the line of argument given in detail in my " Origin of Species." The homological construction of the whole *Leuckart, in Todd's " Cyclop, of Anat.," 1849-52, vol. iv, p. 1415. In man this organ is only from three to six lines in length, but, like so many other rudimentary parts, it is variable in development as well as in other characters. I See, on this subject, Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, pp. 675, 676, 706. RUDIMENTS. 27 frame in the members of the same class is intelligible, if we admit their descent from a common progenitor, together with their subsequent adaptation to diversified conditions. On any other view, the similarity of pattern between the hand of a man or monkey, the foot of a horse, the nipper of a seal, the wing of a bat, etc., is utterly inexplicable.* It is no scientific explanation to assert that they have all been formed on the same ideal plan. With respect to de- velopment, we can clearly understand, on the principle of variations supervening at a rather late embryonic period, and being inherited at a corresponding period, how it is that the embryos of wonderfully different forms should still retain, more or less perfectly, the structure of their common progenitor. No other explanation has ever been given of the marvelous fact that the embryos of a man, dog, seal, bat, reptile, etc., can at first hardly be distinguished from each other. In order to understand the existence of rudi- mentary organs, we have only to suppose that a former pro- genitor possessed the parts in question in a perfect state, and that under changed habits of life they became greatly reduced, either from simple disuse, or through the natural sfliection of those individuals which were least encumbered with a superfluous part, aided by the other means pre- viously indicated. * Prof. Bianconi, in a recently published work, illustrated by ad- mirable engravings (" La Theorie Darwinienne et la creation dite in- d6pendante," 1874), endeavors to show that homological structures, in the above and other cases, can be fully explained on mechanical principles, in accordance with their uses. No one has shown so well, how admirably such structures are adapted for their final purpose ; and this adaptation can, as I believe, be explained through natural selection. In considering the wing of a bat, he brings forward (p. 218) what appears to me (to use Auguste Comte's words) a mere met- aphysical principle, namely, the preservation "in its integrity of the mammalian nature of the animal." In only a few cases does he dis- cuss rudiments, and then only those parts which are partially rudimentary, such as the little hoofs of the pig and ox, which do not touch the ground ; these he shows clearly to be of service to the ani- mal. It is unfortunate that he did not consider such cases as the minute teeth, which never cut through the jaw in the ox, or the mammae of male quadrupeds, or the wings of certain beetles, existing under the soldered wing-covers, or the vestiges of the pistil and stamens in various flowers, and many other such cases. Although I greatly admire Prof. Bianconi's work, yet the belief now held by most naturalists seems to me left unshaken, that homological struct- ures are inexplicable on the principle of mere adaptation. 28 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Thus we can understand how it has come to pass that man and all other vertebrate animals have been con- structed on the same general model, why they pass through the same early stages of development, and why they retain certain rudiments in common. Consequently we ought frankly to admit their community of descent ; to take any other view, is to admit that our own structure, and that oS all the animals around us, is a mere snare laid to entrap our judgment. This conclusion is greatly strengthened, if we look to the members of the whole animal series, and con- sider the evidence derived from their affinities or classifica- tion, their geographical distribution and geological succes- sion. It is only our natural prejudice, and that arrogance which made our forefathers declare that they were de- scended from demi-gods, which leads us to demur to this conclusion. But the time will before long come, when it will be thought wonderful that naturalists, who were well acquainted with the comparative structure and development of man, and other mammals, should have believed that each was the work of a separate act of creation. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. CHAPTER II. ON THE MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT OF MAN FROM SOME LOWER FORM. Variability of body and inind in man Inheritance Causes of varia- bility Laws of variation the same in man as in the lower ani- mals Direct action of the conditions of life Effects of the increased use and disuse of parts Arrested development Keversion Correlated variation Rate of increase Checks to increase Natural selection Man the most dominant animal in the world Importance of his corporeal structure The causes which have led to his becoming erect Consequent changes of structure Decrease in size of the canine teeth Increased size and altered shape of the skull Nakedness Absence of a tail Defenceless condition of man. IT is manifest that man is now subject to much variabil- ity. No two individuals of the same race are quite alike. We may compare millions of faces, and each will be dis- tinct, There is an equally great amount of diversity in the proportions and dimensions of the various parts of the body; the length of the legs being one of the most variable points.* Although in some quarters of the world an elongated skull, and in other quarters a short skull prevails, yet there is great diversity of shape even within the limits of the same race, as with the aborigines of America and South Australia the latter a race " probably as pure and homogeneous in blood, customs, and language as any in existence" and even with the inhabitants of so confined an area as the Sandwich Islands.f An eminent dentist assures, me that * " Investigations in Military and Anthropolog. Statistics of Ameri- can Soldiers," by B. A. Gould, 1869, p. 256. f With respect to the " Cranial forms of the American Aborigines," see Dr. Aitken Meigs in "Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.," Philadelphia, May, 1868. On the Australians, see Huxley, in Lyell's " Antiquity of Man," 1863, p. 87. On the Sandwich Islanders, Prof. J. Wyman, "Observations on Crania," Boston, 1868, p. 18. 30 THE DESCENT OF MAN. there is nearly as much diversity in the teeth as in the feat- ures. The chief arteries' so frequently run in abnormal courses, that it has been found useful for surgical purposes to calculate from 1040 corpses how often each course pre- vails.* The muscles are eminently variable : thus those of the foot were found by Prof. Turner f not to be strictly alike in any two out of fifty bodies ; and in some the de- viations were considerable. He adds, that the power of performing the appropriate movements must have been modified in accordance with the several deviations. Mr. J. Wood has recorded \ the occurrence of 295 muscular variations in thirty-six subjects, and in another set of the same number no less than 558 variations; those occurring on both sides of the body being only reckoned as one. In the last set, not one body out of the thirty-six was " found totally wanting in departures from the standard descrip- tions of the muscular system given in anatomical text books." A single body presented the extraordinary num- ber of twenty-five distinct abnormalities. The same mus- cle sometimes varies in many ways : thus Prof. Macalister describes no less than twenty distinct variations in the palmaris accessorius. The famous old anatomist, Wolff, | insists that the inter- nal viscera are more variable than the external parts: Nulla particula est qua non aliter et aliter in aliis se liabeat homimlus. He has even written a treatise on the choice of typical examples of the viscera for representation. A discussion on the beau-ideal of the liver, lungs, kidneys, etc., as of the human face divine, sounds strange in our ears. The variability or diversity of the mental faculties in men of the same race, not to mention the greater differ- ences between the men of distinct races, is so notorious that not a word need here be caid. So it is with the lower ani- mals. All who have had charge of menageries admit this fact, and we see it plainly in our dogs and other domestic * "Anatomy of the Arteries," by K. Quain. Preface, vol. i, 1844. f "Transact. Royal Soc. Edinburgh," vol. xxiv, pp. 175, 189. t " Proc. Royal Soc.," 1867, p. 544 ; also 1868, pp. 483, 524. There is a previous paper, 1866, p. 229. "Proc. R. Irish Academy," vol. x, 1868, p. 141. j " Act. Acad. St. Petersburg," 1778, part ii, p. 217. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 31 animals. Brehm especially insists that each individual monkey of those which he kept tame in Africa had its own peculiar disposition and temper: he mentions one baboon remarkable for its high intelligence; and the keepers in the Zoological Gardens pointed out to me a monkey, belonging to the New World division, equally remarkable for intelli- gence. Eengger, also, insists on the diversity in the vari- ous mental characters of the monkeys of the same species which he kept in Paraguay; and this diversity, as he adds, is partly innate, and partly the result of the manner in which they have been treated or educated.* I have elsewhere f so fully discussed the subject of In- heritance, that I need here add hardly any thing. A greater number of facts have been collected with respect to the transmission of the most trifling, as well as of the most important characters in man, than in any of the lower ani- mals; though the facts are copious enough with respect to the latter. So in regard to mental qualities, their trans- mi^sion is manifest in our dogs, horses, and other domestic animals. Besides special tastes and habits, general intelli- gence, courage, bad and good temper, etc., are certainly transmitted. With man we see similar facts in almost every family ; and we now know, through the admirable labors of Mr. Galtonf that genius which implies a wonder- fully complex combination of high faculties, tends to be inherited; and, on the other hand, it is too certain that in- sanity and deteriorated mental powers likewise run in families. With respect to the causes of variability, we are in all cases very ignorant; but we can see that in man as in the lower animals, they stand in some relation to the conditions to which each species has been exposed during several gen- erations. Domesticated animals vary more than those in a state of nature; and this is apparently due to the diversified and changing nature of the conditions to which they have been subjected. In this respect the different races of man *Brehm, " TMerleben," B. i, s. 58, 87. Ttengger, " Saugethiere von Paraguay," s. 57. f "Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, chap. xii. t" Hereditary Genius: an Inqniry into its Laws and Conse- quences," 1869. 32 THE DESCENT OF MAN. resemble domesticated animals, and so do the individuals of the same race, when inhabiting a very wide area, like that of America. We see the influence of diversified con- ditions in the more civilized nations; for the members be- longing to different grades of rank, and following different occupations, present a greater range of character than do the members of barbarous nations. But the uniformity of savages has often been exaggerated, and in some cases can hardly be said to exist.* It is, nevertheless, an error to speak of man, even if we look only to the conditions to which he has been exposed, as " far more domesticated "f than any other animal. Some savage races, such as the Australians, are not exposed to more diversified conditions than are many species which have a wide range. In an- other and much more important respect, man differs widely from any strictly domesticated animal; for his breeding has never long been controlled, either by methodical or uncon- scious selection. No race or body of men has been so com- pletely subjugated by other men, as that certain individuals should be preserved, and thus unconsciously selected, from somehow excelling in utility to their masters. Nor have certain male and female individuals been intentionally picked out and matched, except in the well-known case of the Prussian grenadiers; and in this case man obeyed, as might have been expected, the law of methodical selection; for it is asserted that many tall men were reared in the villages inhabited by the grenadiers and their tall wives. In Sparta, also, a form of selection was followed, for it was enacted that all children should be examined shortly after birth; the well-formed and vigorous being preserved, the others left to perish. J *Mr. Bates remarks (" The Naturalist on the Amazons," 1863, vol. ii, p. 159), with respect to the Indians of the same South American tribe, "No two of them were at all similar in the shape of the head ; one man had an oval visage with fine features, and another was quite Mongolian in breadth and prominence of cheek, spread of nos- trils, and obliquity of eyes." f Blumenbach, " Treatises on Anthropolog.," Eug. translat., 1865, p. 205. f Mitford's "History of Greece," vol. i, p. 282. It appears also from a passage in Xenophon's "Memorabilia," B. ii, 4 (to which my attention has been called by the Rev. J. N. Hoare), that it was a well recognized principle with the Greeks, that men ought to select their wives with a view to the health and vigor of their children. The MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 33 If we consider all the races of man as forming a single species, his range is enormous; but some separate races, as the Americans and Polynesians, have very wide ranges. It is a well-known law that widely ranging species are much more variable than species with restricted ranges; and the variability of man may with mere truth be compared with that of widely ranging species, than with that of domesti- cated animals. Not only does variability appear to be induced in man and the lower animals by the same general causes, but in both the same parts of the body are affected in a closely analogous manner. This has been proved in such full de- tail by Godron and Quatrefages, that I need here only refer to their works.* Monstrosities, which graduate into slight variations, are likewise so similar in man and the lower animals, that the same classification and the same terms can be used for both, as has been shown by Isidore Geoffroy St.-Hilaire.f In my work on the variation of domestic animals, I have attempted to arrange in a rude fashion the laws of variation under the following heads : The direct and definite action of changed conditions, as exhibited by Grecian poet, Theognis, who lived 550 B.C., clearly saw how import- ant selection, if carefully applied, would be for the improvement of mankind. He saw, likewise, that wealth often checks the proper action of sexual selection. He thus writes : " With kine and horses, Kurnus! we proceed By reasonable rules, and choose a breed For profit and increase, at any price; Of a sound stock, without defect or vice. But, in the daily matches that we make, The price is every thing: for money's sake, Men marry: women are in marriage given The churl or ruffian, that in wealth has thriven. May match his offspring with the proudest race; Thas every thing is mix'd, noble and base! If then in outward manner, form, and mind, You find us a degraded, motley kind, Wonder no more, my friend! the cause is plain, And to lament the consequence is vain." (The works of J. Hookham Frere, vol. ii, 1872, p. 334.) * Godron, "De 1'Espece," 1859, torn, ii, livre 3. Quatrefages, " Unite de 1'Espece Humaine," 1861. Also Lectures on Anthropol- ogy, given in the " Revue des Cours Scientifiques," 1866-1868. Hist. Gen. et Part, des Anomalies de rOrganisation," in three torn, i, 1832. f " Hisl volumes, 34 THE DESCENT OF MAN. all or nearly all the individuals of the same species, varying in the same manner under the same circumstances. The effects of the long-contiiiued use or disuse of parts. The cohesion of homologous parts. The variability of multiple parts. Compensation of growth ; but of this law I have found no good instance in the case of man. The effects of the mechanical pressure of one part on another; as of the pelvis on the cranium of the infant in the womb. Arrests of development, leading to the diminution or suppression of parts. The reappearance of long-lost characters through reversion. And lastly, con-elated variation. And these Bo-called laws apply equally to man and the lower animals ; and most of them even to plants. It would be superfluous here to discuss all of them; * but several are so important, that they must be treated at considerable length. The Direct and Definite Action of Changed Conditions. This is a most perplexing subject. It cannot be denied that changed conditions produce some, and occasionally a considerable effect, on organisms of all kinds; and it seems at first probable that if sufficient time were allowed this would be the invariable result. But I have failed to obtain clear evidence in favor of this conclusion; and valid reasons may be urged on the other side, at least as far as the in- numerable structures are concerned which are adapted for special ends. There can, however, be no doubt that changed conditions induce an almost indefinite amount of fluctuating variability, by which the whole organization is rendered in some degree plastic. In the United States, above 1,000,000 soldiers, who served in the late war, were measured, and the States in which they were born and reared were recorded, f From this astonishing number of observations it is proved that local influences of some kind act directly on stature; and we further learn that " the State where the physical growth has in great measure taken place, and the State of birth, *I have fully discussed these laws in my "Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, chap, xxii and xxiii. M. J. P. Durand has lately (1868) published a valuable essay " De 1'Influ- ence des Milieux," etc. He lays much stress, in the case of plants, on the nature of the soil. f "Investigations in Military and Anthrop. Statistics," etc., 1869, by B. A. Gould, pp. 93, 107, 126, 131, 134. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 35 which indicates the ancestry, seem to exert a marked in- fluence on the stature." For instance, it is established, " that residence in the Western States, during the years of growth, tends to produce increase of stature." On the other hand, it is certain that with sailors, their life delays growth, as shown "by the great difference between the statures of soldiers and sailors at the ages of seventeen and eighteen years." Mr. B. A. Gould endeavored to ascertain the nature of the influences which thus act on stature; but he arrived only at negative results, namely, that they did not relate to climate, the elevation of the land, soil, nor even "in any controlling degree" to the abundance or the need of the comforts of life. This latter conclusion is directly opposed to that arrived at by Villerme, from the statistics of the height of the conscripts in different parts of France. When we compare the differences in stature between the Polynesian chiefs and the lower orders within the same islands, or between the inhabitants of the fertile volcanic and low ban en coral islands of the same ocean,* or again between the Fuegians on the eastern and western shores of their country, where the means of subsistence are very different, it is scarcely possible to avoid the conclusion that better food and greater comfort do influence stature. But the preceding statements show how difficult it is to arrive at any precise result. Dr. Beddoe has lately proved that, with the inhabitants of Britain, residence in towns and certain occupations have a deteriorating influence on height; and he infers that the result is to a oertain extent inherited, as is likewise the case in the United States. Dr. Beddoe further believes that wherever a " race attains its maximum of physical development, it rises highest in energy and moral vigor, "f Whether external conditions produce any other direct effect on man is not known. It might have been expected that differences of climate would have had a marked influ- ence, inasmuch as the lungs and kidneys are brought into *For the Polynesians, see Prichard's "Physical Hist, of Man- kind," vol. v, 1847, pp. 145, 283. Also Godron, " De 1'Espece," torn, ii, p. 289. There is also a remarkable difference in appearance be- tween the closely allied Hindoos inhabiting the Upper Ganges and Bengal ; see Elphinstone's "History of India," vol. i, p. 324. f " Memoirs, Anthropolog. Soc.." vol. iii, 1867-69, pp. 561, 565. 36 THE DESCENT OF MAN. activity under a low temperature, and the liver and skin under a high one.* It was formerly thought that the color of the skin and the character of the hair were determined by light or heat; and although it can hardly be denied that some effect is thus produced, almost all observers now agree that the effect has been very small,, even after exposure during many ages. But this subject will be more properly discussed when we treat of the different races of mankind. With our domestic animals there are grounds for believing that cold and damp directly affect the growth of the hair; but I have not met with any evidence on this head in the case of man. Effects of the Increased Use and Disuse of Parts. It is well known that use strengthens the muscles in the individ- ual, and complete disuse, or the destruction of the proper nerve, weakens them. When the eye is destroyed, the optio nerve often becomes atrophied. When an artery is tied, the lateral channels increase not only in diameter, but in the thickness and strength of their coats. When one kid- ney ceases to act from disease, the other increases in size, and does double work. Bones increase not only in thick- ness, but in length, from carrying a greater weight, f Dif- ferent occupations, habitually followed, lead to changed proportions in various parts of the body. Thus it was as- certained by the United States Commission! that the legs of the sailors employed in the late war were longer by 0.217 of an inch than those of the soldiers, though the sailors were on an average shorter men ; while their arms were shorter by 1.09 of an inch, and therefore, out of proportion, shorter in relation to their lesser height. This shortness of the arms is apparently due to their greater use, and is an unexpected result: but sailors chiefly use their arms in pull- ing, and not in supporting weights. With sailors, the girth of the neck and the depth of the instep are greater, while *Dr. Brakenridge, "Theory of Diathesis," ''Medical Times," June 19 and July 17, 1869. f 1 have given authorities for these several statements in my " Variation of Animals under Domestication," vol. ii, pp. 297-300- Dr. Jaeger, " Ueber das Langenwachsthuni der Knochen," " Jenaia chen Zeitschrift," B. v, Heft. i. J " Investigations," etc. By B. A. Gould, 1869, p. 388 MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 37 the circumference of the chest, waist, and hips is less than in soldiers. "Whether the several foregoing modifications would be- come hereditary, if the same habits of life were followed during many generations, is not known, but it is probable. Rengger* attributes the thin legs and thick arms of the Payaguas Indians to successive generations having passed nearly their whole lives in canoes, with their lower extremi- ties motionless. Other writers have come to a similar con- clusion in analogous cases. According to Cranz,f who lived for a long time with the Esquimaux, " the natives believe that ingenuity and dexterity in seal-catching (their highest art and virtue) is hereditary; there is really something in it, for the son of a celebrated seal-catcher will distinguish himself, though he lost his father in childhood." But in this case it is mental aptitude, quite as much as bodily structure, Avhich appears to be inherited. It is asserted that the hands of English laborers are at birth larger than those of the gentry. J From the correlation which exists, at least in some cases, between the development of the ex- tremities and of the jaws, it is possible that in those classes which do not labor much with their hands and feet, the jaws would be reduced in size from this cause. That they are generally smaller in refined and civilized men than in hard-working men or savages, is certain. But with savages, as Mr. Herbert Spencer || has remarked, the greater use of the jaws in chewing coarse, uncooked food, would act in a direct manner on the masticatory muscles, and on the bones to which they are attached. In infants, long before birth, the skin on the soles of the feet is thicker than on any other part of the body;! and it can hardly be doubted that this is due to the inherited effects of pressure during a long series of generations. It is familiar to every one that watchmakers and engrav- ers are liable to be short-sighted, while men living much out of doors, and especially savages, are generally long- * " Saugethiere von Paraguay," 1880, s. 4. f" History of Greenland," Eng. translat., 1767, vol. i, p. 230. i " Intermarriage." By Alex. Walker, 1838, p. 377. " The Variation of Animals under Domestication," vol. i, p. 173. | "Principles of Biology," vol. i, p. 455. f Paget, " Lectures on Surgical Pathology," vol. ii, 1853, p. 209. 38 THE DESCENT OF MAN. sighted.* Short-sight and long-sight certainly tend to be inherited, f The inferiority of Europeans, in comparison with savages, in eyesight and in the other senses, is no doubt the accumulated and transmitted effect of lessened use during many generations ; for Kengger J states that he has repeatedly observed Europeans, who had been brought up and spent their whole lives with the wild Indians, who nevertheless did not equal them in the sharpness of their senses. The same naturalist observes that the cavities in the skull for the reception of the several sense-organs are larger in the American aborigines than in Europeans ; and this probably indicates a corresponding difference in the dimensions of the organs themselves. Blumenbach has also remarked on the large size of the nasal cavities in the skulls of the American aborigines, and connects this fact with their remarkably acute power of smell. The Mon- golians of the plains of Northern Asia, according to Pallas, have wonderfully perfect senses; and Prichard believes that the great breadth of their skulls across the zygomas follows from their highly developed sense-organs. The Quechua Indians inhabit the lofty plateaux of Peru; and Alcide d'Orbigny states || that, from continually breath- ing a highly rarefied atmosphere, they have acquired chests and lungs of extraordinary dimensions. The cells, also, of the lungs are larger and more numerous than in Europeans. * It is a singular and unexpected fact that sailors are inferior to landsmen in their mean distance of distinct vision. Dr. B. A. Gould (" Sanitary Memoirs of the War of the Rebellion," 1869, p. 530), has proved this to be the case ; and he accounts for it by the ordinary range of vision in sailors being " restricted to the length of the vessel and the height of the masts." f " The Variation of Animals under Domestication," vol. i, p. 8. $ " Saugethiere von Paraguay," s. 8, 10. I have had good oppor- tunities for observing the extraordinary power of eyesight in the Fuegians. See also Lawrence (" Lectures on Physiology," etc. , 1822, p. 404) on this same subject. M. Qiraud-Teulon has recently col- lected (" Revue des Cours Scientifiques," 1870, p. 625) a large and valuable body of evidence proving that the cause of short-sight, " O'est le trcvoatt assidu, de pres." % Prichard, " Phys. Hist, of Mankind," on the authority of Blum- enbach, vol. i, 1851, p. 311 ; for the statement by Pallas, vol. iv, 1844, p. 407. I Quoted by Prichard, " Researches into the Phys. Hist, of Man- kind," voL v, p. 468. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 39 These observations have been doubted ; bat Mr. D. Forbes carefully measured many Aymaras, an allied race, living at the height of between 10,000 and 15,000 feet ; and he in- forms me * that they differ conspicuously from the men of all other races seen by him in the circumference and length of their bodies. In his table of measurements, the stature of each man is taken at 1,000, and the other measurements are reduced to this standard. It is here seen that the ex- tended arms of the Aymaras are shorter than those of Europeans, and much shorter than those of Negroes. The legs are likewise shorter ; and they present this remarkable peculiarity, that in every Aymara measured, the femur is actually shorter than the tibia. On an average, the length of the femur to that of the tibia is as 211 to 252 ; while in two Europeans, measured at the same time, the femora to the tibise were as 244 to 230 ; and in three Negroes as 258 to 241. The humerus is likewise shorter relatively to the forearm. This shortening of that part of the limb which is nearest to the body, appears to be, as suggested to me by Mr. Forbes, a case of compensa- tion in relation with the greatly increased length of the trunk. The Aymaras present some other singular points of structure, for instance, the very small projection of the heel. These men are so thoroughly acclimatized to their cold and lofty abode, that when formerly carried down by the Spaniards to the low eastern plains, and when now tempted down by high wages to the gold- washings, they suffer a frightful rate of mortality. Nevertheless Mr. Forbes found a few pure families which had survived during two genera- tions : and he observed that they still inherited their char- acteristic peculiarities. But it was manifest, even without measurement, that these peculiarities had all decreased ; and on measurement, their bodies were found not to be so much elongated as those of the men on the high plateau ; while their femora had become somewhat lengthened, as had their tibiae, although in a less degree. The actual measurements may be seen by consulting Mr. Forbes* memoir. From these observations, there can, I think, be no doubt that residence during many generations at a great *Mr. Forbes' valuable paper is now published in the "Journal of the Ethnological Soc. of London, "new series, vol. ii, 1870, p. 193. 40 THE DESCENT OF MAN. elevation tends, both directly and indirectly, to induce in- herited modifications in the proportions of the body.* Although man may not have been much modified during the latter stages of his existence through the increased or decreased use of parts, the facts now given show that his liability in this respect has not been lost ; and we positively know that the same law holds good with the lower animals. Consequently we may infer that when at a remote epoch the progenitors of man were in a transitional state, and were changing from quadrupeds into bipeds, natural selec- tion would probably have been greatly aided by the in- herited effects of the increased or diminished use of the dif- ferent parts of the body. Arrests of Development. There is a difference between arrested development and arrested growth, for parts in the former state continue to grow while still retaining their early condition. Various monstrosities come under this head; and some, as a cleft-palate, are known to be occa- sionally inherited. It will suffice for our purpose to refer to the arrested brain-development of microcephalous idiots, as described in Vogt's memoir, f Their skulls are smaller, and the convolutions of the brain are less complex than in normal men. The frontal sinus, or the projection over the eye-brows, is largely developed, and the jaws are pro- gnathous to an " effrayant " degree; so that these idiots somewhat resemble the lower types of mankind. Their in- telligence, and most of their mental faculties, are extremely feeble. They cannot acquire the power of speech, and are wholly incapable of prolonged attention, but are much given to imitation. They are strong and remarkably ac- tive, continually gambolling and jumping about, and mak- ing grimaces. They often ascend stairs on all-fours; and are curiously fond of climbing up furniture or trees. We are thus reminded of the delight shown by almost all boys in climbing trees; and this again reminds us how lambs and kids, originally alpine animals, delight to frisk on any hillock, however small. Idiots also resemble the lower *Dr. Wilckens (" Landwirthschaft. Woclienblatt," No. 10, 1869) has lately published an interesting Essay showing how domestic ani- mals, which live in mountainous regions, have their frames modified. f " Mernoire suT les Microcephales, " 1867, pp. 50, 125, 169, 171, MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 41 animals in some other respects; thus several cases are re- corded of their carefully smelling every mouthful of food before eating it. One idiot is described as often using his mouth in aid of his hands while hunting for lice. They are often filthy in their habits, and have no sense of de- cency; and several cases have been published of their bodies being remarkably hairy.* Reversion. Many of the cases to be here given, might have been introduced under the last heading. When a structure is arrested in its development, but still continues growing, until it closely resembles a corresponding struct- ure in some lower and adult member of the same group, it may in one sense be considered as a case of reversion. The lower members in a group give us some idea how the com- mon progenitor was probably constructed; and it is hardly credible that a complex part, arrested at an early phase of embryonic development, should go on growing so as ulti- mately to perform its proper function, unless it had ac- quired such power during some earlier state of existence, when the present exceptional or arrested structure was normal. The simple brain of a microcephalous idiot, in as far as it resembles that of an ape, may in this sense be said to offer a case of reversion, f There are other cases * Prof. Laycock sums up the character of brute-like idiots by call- ing them theroid ; "Journal of Mental Science," July, 1863. Dr. Scott ("The Deaf and Dumb," 2d edit., 1870, p. 10) has often ob- served the imbecile smelling their food. See> on this same subject, and on the hairiness of idiots, Dr. Maudsley, "Body and Mind," 1870, pp. 46-51. Pinel has also given a striking case of hairiness in an idiot. f In my "Variation of Animals under Domestication" (vol. ii, p. 57), I attributed the not very rare cases of supernumerary mammae in women to reversion. I was led to this as a probable conclusion, by the additional mammae being generally placed symmetrically on the breast; and more especially from one case, in which a single effi- cient mammae occurred in the inguinal region of a woman, the daugh- ter of another woman with supernumerary mammae. But I now find (see, for instance, Prof. Preyer, " Der Kampf um das Dasein," 1869, s. 45) that mammae erraticce occur in other situations, as on the back, in the armpit, and on the thigh; the mammae in this latter instance having given so much milk that the child was thus nourished. The probability that the additional mammae are due to reversion is thus much weakened ; nevertheless, it still seems to me probable, because two pairs are often found symmetrically on the breast ; and of this I myself have received information in several cases. It is well known 42 THE DESCENT OF MAN. which come more strictly under our present head of rever- sion. Certain structures, regularly occurring in the lower members of the group to which man belongs, occasionally make their appearance in him, though not found in the normal human embryo ; or, if normally present in the human embryo, they become abnormally developed, al- though in a manner which is normal in the lower members of the group. These remarks will be rendered clearer by the following illustrations. that some Lemurs normally have two pairs of mammae on the breast. Five cases have been recorded of the presence of more than a pair of mammae (of course rudimentary) in the male sex of mankind ; see "Journal of Anat aiM Physiology," 1872, p. 56, for a case given by Dr. Handyside, in which two brothers exhibited this peculiarity ; see also a paper by Dr. Bartels, in " Reichert's and du Bois-Reymond's Archiv.," 1872, p. 304. In one of the cases alluded to by Dr. Bartels, a man bore five mammae, one being medial and placed above the navel ; Meckel von Hernsbach thinks that this latter case is illus- trated by a medial mammae occurring in certain Cheiroptera. On the whole, we may well doubt if additional mammae would ever have been developed in both sexes of mankind, had not his early progeni- tors been provided with more than a single pair. In the above work (vol. ii, p. 12), I also attributed, though with much hesitation, the frequent cases of polydactylisin in men and various animals to rever- sion. I was partly led to this through Prof. Owen's statement, that some of the Ichthyopterygia possess more than five digits, and there- fore, as I supposed, had retained a primordial condition ; but Prof. Qegenbaur (" Jenaischen Zeitschrift," B. v, Heft. 3, s. 341), disputes Owen's conclusion. On the other hand, according to the opinion lately advanced by Dr. Giinther, on the paddle of Ceratodus, which is provided with articulated bony rays on both sides of a central chain of bones, there seems no great difficulty in admitting that six or more digits on one side, or on both sides, might reappear through reversion. I am informed by Dr. Zouteveen that there is a case on record of a man having twenty-four fingers and twenty-four toes ! I was chiefly led to the conclusion that the presence of supernumerary digits might be due to reversion from the fact that such digits, not only are strongly inherited, but, as I then believed, had the power of regrowth after amputation, like the normal digits of the lower verte- brata. But I have explained in the second edition of my Variation under Domestication why I now place little reliance on the recorded cases of such regrowth. Nevertheless it deserves notice, inasmuch as arrested development and reversion are intimately related pro- cesses ; that various structures in an embryonic or arrested condition, such as a cleft palate, bifid uterus, etc., are frequently accompanied by polydactylism. This has been strongly insisted on by Meckel and Isidore Geoff roy St.-Hilaire. But at present it is the safest course to give up altogether the idea that there is any relation between the de- velopment of supernumerary digits and reversion to some lowly or- ganized progenitor of man _ MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 43 In various mammals the uterus graduates from a double organ with two distinct orifices and two passages, as in the marsupials, into a single organ, which is in no way double except from having a slight internal fold, as in the higher apes and man. The rodents exhibit a perfect series of gra- dations between these two extreme states. In all mammals the uterus is developed from two simple primitive tubes, the inferior portions of which form the cornua; and it is, in the words of Dr. Farre, "by the coalescence of the two cornua at their lower extremities that the body of the uterus is formed in man; while in those animals in which no mid- dle portion or body exists, the cornua remain ununited. As the development of the uterus proceeds, the two cornua be- come gradually shorter, until at length they are lost, or, as it were, absorbed into the body of the uterus." The angles of the uterus are still produced into cornua, even in ani- mals as high up in the scale as the lower apes and lemurs. Now in women, anomalous cases are not very infrequent, in which the mature uterus is furnished with cornua, or is partially divided into two organs; and such cases, according to Owen, repeat " the grade of concentrative development," attained by certain rodents. Here perhaps we have an in- stance of a' simple arrest of embryonic development, with subsequent growth and perfect functional development; for either side of the partially double uterus is capable of per- forming the proper office of gestation. In other and rarer cases, two distinct uterine cavities are formed, each having its proper orifice and passage.* No such stage is passed through during the ordinary development of the embryo ; and it is difficult to believe, though perhaps not impossible, that the two simple, minute, primitive tubes should know how (if such an expression may be used) to grow into two distinct uteri, each with a well-constructed orifice and pas- sage, and each furnished with numerous muscles, nerves, glands and vessels, if they had not formerly passed through a similar course of development, as in the case of existing marsupials. No one will pretend that so perfect a struct- ure as the abnormal double uterus in woman could be the result of mere chance. But the principal of reversion, by * See Dr. A. Farre's well-known article in the " Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology," vol. v, 1859, p. 642. Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, 1868, p. 687. Prof. Turner, in "Edinburgh Medical Journal," Feb., Iggo- 44 THE DESCENT OF MAN. which a long-lost structure is called back into existence, might serve as the guide for -its full development, even after the lapse of an enormous interval of time. Prof. Canestrini, after discussing the foregoing and various analogous cases, arrives at the same conclusion as that just given. He adduces another instance, in the case of the malar bone,* which, in some of the Quadrumana and other mammals, normally consists of two portions. This is its condition in the human foetus when two months old ; and through arrested development, it sometimes remains thus in man when adult, more especially in the lower prognathous races. Hence Canestrini concludes that some ancient progenitor of man must have had this bone normally divided into two portions, which afterward be- came fused together. In man the frontal bone consists of a single piece, but in the embryo, and in children, and in almost all the lower mammals, it consists of two pieces separated by a distinct suture. This suture occasionally persists more or less distinctly in man after maturity ; and more frequently in ancient than in recent crania, especially, as Canestrini has observed, in those exhumed from the Drift, and belonging to the brachycephalic type. Here again he comes to the same conclusion as in the analogous case of the malar bones. In this, and other instances presently to be given, the cause of ancient races approach- ing the lower animals in certain characters more frequently than do the modern races, appears to be, that the latter stand at a somewhat greater distance in the long line of descent from their early semi-human progenitors. *"Annuario della Soc. del Naturalisti in Modena," 1867, p. 83. Prof. Canestrini gives extracts on this subject from various authori- ties. Laurillard remarks, that as he has found a complete similarity in the form, proportions, and connection of the two malar bones in several human subjects and in certain apes, he cannot consider tins' disposition of the parts as simply accidental. Another paper on this same anomaly has been published by Dr. Saviotti in the " Gazzetta delle Cliniche," Turin, 1871, where he says that traces of the division may be detected in about two per cent, of adult skulls; he also re- marks that it more frequently occurs in prognathous skulls, not of the Aryan race, than in others. See also G. Delorenzi on the same subject ; " Tre nuovi casi d'anomalia dell' osso malare," Torino, 1872. Also, E. Morselli, " Sopra una rara anomalia dell' osso malare," Modena, 1872. Still more recently Grnber has written a pamphlet on the division of this bone. I give these references because a re- viewer, without any grounds or scruples, has thrown doubts on my statements. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 45 Various other anomalies in man, more or less analogous to the foregoing, have been advanced by different authors, as cases of reversion ; but these seem not a little doubtful, for we have to descend extremely low in the mammalian series, before we find such structures normally present.* In man, the canine teeth are perfectly efficient instruments for mastication. But their true canine character, as Owenf remarks, " is indicated by the conical form of the crown, which terminates in an obtuse point, is convex outward and flat or sub-concave within, at the base of which surface there is a feeble prominence. The conical form is best ex- pressed in the Melanian races, especially the Australian. " The canine is more deeply implanted, and by a stronger fang than the incisors." Nevertheless, this tooth no longer serves man as a special weapon for tearing his enemies or prey; it may, therefore, as far as its proper function is con- cerned, be considered as rudimentary. In every large col- lection of human skulls some may be found, as HackelJ observes, with the canine teeth projecting considerably be- yond the others in the same manner as in the anthropomor- phous apes, but in a less degree. In these cases, open spaces between the teeth in the one jaw are left for the re- ception of the canines of the opposite jaw. An interspace of this kind in a Kaffir skull, figured by Wagner, is sur- prisingly wide. Considering how few are the ancient skulls which have been examined, compared to recent skulls, it is an interesting fact that in at least three cases * A whole series of cases is given by Isid. Geoffrey St.-Hilaire, " Hist, des Anomalies," torn, iii, p. 437. A reviewer (" Journal of Anat. and Physiology," 1871, p. 366) blames me much for not having discussed the numerous cases, which have been recorded, of various parts arrested in their development. He says that, according to my theory, " every transient condition of an organ, during its develop- ment, is not only a means to an end, but once was an end in itself." This does not seem to me necessarily to hold good. Why should not variation occur during an early period of development, having no relation to reversion ; yet such variations might be preserved and ac- cumulated, if in any way serviceable, for instance, in shortening and simplifying the course of development? And again, why should not injurious abnormalities, such as atrophied or hypertrophied parts, which have no relation to a former state of existence, occur at an early period, as well as during maturity? f "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, 1868, p. 323. % " Generelle Morphologic," 1866, B. ii, s. civ. Carl Vogt's "Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., 1864, p. 151. 46 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the canines project largely ; and in the Naulette jaw they are spoken of as enormous.* Of the anthropomorphous 'apes the males alone have their canines fully developed ; but in the female gorilla, and in a less degree in the female orang, these teeth project con- siderably beyond the others ; therefore the fact, of which I have been assured, that women sometimes have considerably projecting canines, is no serious objection to the belief that their occasional great development in man is a case of re- version to an ape-like progenitor. He who rejects with scorn the belief that the shape of his own canines, and their occasional great development in other men, are due to our early forefathers having been provided with these formidable weapons, will probably reveal, by sneering, the line of his descent. For though he no longer intends, nor has the power, to use these teeth as weapons, he will unconsciously retract his " snarling muscles " (thus named by Sir 0. Bell),f so as to expose them ready for action, like a dog prepared to fight. Many muscles are occasionally developed in man, which are proper to the Quadrumana or other mammals. Prof. VlacovichJ examined forty male subjects, and found a mus- cle, called by him the ischio-pubic, in nineteen of them; in three others there was a ligament which represented this muscle; and in the remaining eighteen no trace of it. In only two out of thirty female subjects was this muscle de- veloped on both sides, but in three others the rudimentary ligament was present. This muscle, therefore, appears to be much more common in the male than in the female sex; and on the belief in the descent of man from some lower form, the fact is intelligible; for it has been detected in several of the lower animals, and in all of these it serves exclusively to aid the male in the act of reproduction. Mr. J. Wood, in his valuable series of papers, has mi- *C. Carter Blake, on a jaw from La Naulette, " Anthropolog. Review," 1867, p. 295. Schaaffhausen, ibid., 1868, p. 426. f " The Anatomy of Expression," 1844, pp. 110, 181. J Quoted by Prof. Canestrini in the " Annuario," etc., 1867, p. 90. These papers deserve careful study by any one who desires to learn how frequently our muscles vary, and in varying come to re- semble those of the Quadrumana. The following references relate to the few points touched on in my text : "Proc. Royal Soc.," voL xiv, 1865, pp. 379-384 ; vol. xv, 1866, pp. 241, 242 ; vol. xv, 1867, p. 544 ; vol. xvi, 1868, p. 524. I may here add that Dr. Murie and Mr MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 47 nutely described a vast number of muscular variations in man, which resemble normal structures in the lower ani- mals. The muscles which closely resemble those regularly present in our nearest allies, the Quadrumana, are too numerous to be here even specified. In a single male sub- ject, having a strong bodily frame, and well-formed skull, no less than seven muscular variations were observed, all of which plainly represented muscles proper to various kinds of apes. This man, for instance, had on both sides of his neck a true and powerful " levator claviculce," such as is found in all kinds of apes, and which is said to occur in about one out of sixty human subjects.* Again, this man had "a special abductor of the metatarsal bone of the fifth digit, such as Prof. Huxley and Mr. Flower have shown to exist uniformly in the higher and lower apes." I will give only two additional cases; the acromio-basilar muscle is found in all mammals below man, and seems to be correl- ated with a quadrupedal gait,f and it occurs in about one out of sixty human subjects. In the lower extremities Mr. Bradley^ found an abductor ossis metatarsi quinti in both feet of "man; this muscle had not up to that time been re- corded in mankind, but is always present in the anthropo- morphous apes. The muscles of the hands and arms parts which are so eminently characteristic of man are extremely liable to vary, so as to resemble the corresponding muscles in the lower animals. Such resemblances are either perfect or imperfect; yet in the latter case they are manifestly of a transitional nature. Certain variations are more common in man, and others in woman, without our being able to assign any reason. Mr. Wood, after describing numerous St. George Mivart have shown in their Memoir on the Lemuroidea ("Transact. Zoolog. Soc.," vol. vii, 1869, p. 96), how extraordinarily variable some of the muscles are in these animals, the lowest members of the Primates. Gradations, also, in the muscles leading to structures found in animals still lower in the scale, are numerous In the Lemuroidea. *See also Prof. Macalister in "Proc. R. Irish Academy," vol x, 1868, p. 124. fMr. Champneys in "Journal of Anat. and Phys.," November. 1871, p. 178. \ " Journal of Anat. and Phys.," May, 1872, p. 421, Prof. Macalister (ibid., p. 121) has tabulated his observations, and finds that muscular abnormalities are most frequent in the fore- arms, secondly, in the face, thirdly, in the foot, etc. 48 THE DESCENT OF MAN. variations, makes the following pregnant remark: "Notable departures from the ordinary type of the muscular struct- ures run in grooves or directions, which must be taken to indicate some unknown factor, of much importance to a comprehensive knowledge of general and scientific an- atomy."* That this unknown factor is reversion to a former state of existence may be admitted as in the highest degree probable, f It is quite incredible that a man should through mere accident abnormally resemble certain apes in no less than seven of his muscles, if there had been no genetic con- nection between them. On the other hand, if man is de- scended from some ape-like creature, no valid reason can be assigned why certain muscles should not suddenly reap- pear after an interval of many thousand generations, in the same manner as with horses, asses, and mules, dark col- ored stripes suddenly reappear on the legs, and shoulders, after an interval of hundreds, or more probably of thous- ands of generations. These various cases of reversion are so closely related to those of rudimentary organs given in the first chapter, that many of them might have been indifferently introduced either there or here. Thus a human uterus furnished with cornua *The Rev. Dr. Haughton, after giving ("Proc. R. Irish Academy," June 27, 1864, p. 715) a remarkable case of variation in the human flexor pollicis longm, adds : ' ' This remarkable example shows that man may sometimes possess the arrangement of tendons of thumb and fingers characteristic of the macaque ; but whether such a case should be regarded as a macaque passing upward into a man, or a man passing downward into a macaque, or as a congenital freak of nature, I cannot undertake to say." It is satisfactory to hear so capable an anatomist, and so embittered an opponent of evolutionism, admitting even the possibility of either of his first propositions. Prof. Macalister has also described (" Proc. R. Irish Acad.," vol. x, 1864, p. 138) variations in the flexor pollicis longus, remarkable from their relations to the same muscle in the Quadrumana. f Since the first edition of this book appeared, Mr. Wood has pub lished another memoir in the "Phil. Transactions," 1870, p. 8!5, on the varieties of the muscles of the human neck, shoulder, and chest. He here shows how extremely variable these muscles are, and how often and how closely the variations resemble the normal muscles of thfa lower animals. He sums up by remarking: " It will be enough for my purpose if I have succeeded in showing the more important forms which, when occurring as varieties in the human subject, tend to exhibit in a sufficiently marked manner what may be considered as proofs and examples of the Darwinian principle of reversion, or law of inheritance, in this department of anatomical science." MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 49 may be said to represent, in a rudimentary condition, the same organ in its normal state in certain mammals. Some parts which are rudimentary in man, as the os coccyx in both sexes, and the mammge in the male sex, are always present; while others, such as the supra-condyloid foramen, only occasionally appear, and therefore might have been in- troduced under the head of reversion. These several rever- sionary structures, as well as the strictly rudimentary ones, reveal the descent of man from some lower form in an unmistakable manner. Correlated Variation. In man, as in the lower ani- mals, many structures are so intimately related, that when one part varies so does another, without our being able, in most cases, to assign any reason. We cannot say whether the one part governs the other, or whether both are gov- erned by some earlier developed part. Various monstrosi- ties, as I. Geoffroy repeatedly insists t are thus intimately connected. Homologous structures are particularly liable to change together, as we see on the opposite sides of the body, and in the upper and lower extremities. Meckel long ago remarked, that when the muscles of the arm depart from their proper type, they almost always imitate those of the leg; and so, conversely, with the muscles of the legs. The organs of sight and hearing, the teeth and hair, the color of the skin and of the hair, color and constitution, are more or less correlated.* Prof. Schaaffhausen first drew attention to the relation apparently existing between a mus- cular frame and the strongly pronounced supra-orbital ridges, which are so characteristic of the lower races oi man. Besides the variations which can be grouped with more or less probability under the foregoing heads, there is a large class of variations which may be provisionally called spontaneous, for to our ignorance, they appear to arise without any exciting cause. It can, however, be shown that such variations, whether consisting of slight individ- ual differences, or of strongly marked and abrupt devi- ations of structure, depend much more on the constitu- tion of the organism than on the n-ature of the conditions to which it has been subjected, f *The authorities for these several statements are given in my "Variation of Animals under Domestication," vol. ii, pp. 320-335. fThis whole subject has been discussed in chap, xxiii, vol. ii, of my " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication." 50 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Mate of Increase. Civilized populations have been known under favorable conditions, as in the United States, to double their numbers in twenty-five years ; and, accord- ing to a calculation, by Euler, this might occur in a little over twelve years.* At the former rate, the present popu- lation of the United States (thirty millions), would in 657 years cover the whole terraqueous globe so thickly, that four men would have to stand on each square yard of sur- face. The primary or fundamental check to the continued increase of man is the difficulty of gaining subsistence, and of living in comfort. We may infer that this is the case from what we see, for instance, in the United States, where subsistence is easy, and there is plenty of room. If such means were suddenly doubled in Great Britain, our number would be quickly doubled. With civilized nations this primary check acts chiefly by restraining marriages. The greater death-rate of infants in the poorest classes is also very important; as well as the greater mortality, from various diseases, of the inhabitants of crowded and miser- able houses at all ages. The effects of severe epidemics and wars are soon counterbalanced, and more than counter- balanced in nations placed under favorable conditions. Emigration also comes in aid as a temporary check, but with the extremely poor classes, not to any great extent. There is reason to suspect, as Malthus has remarked, that the reproductive power is actually less in barbarous, than in civilized races. We know nothing positively on this head, for with savages no census has been taken ; but from the concurrent testimony of missionaries, and of others who have long resided with such people, it appears that their families are usually small, and large ones rare. This may be partly accounted for, as it is believed, by the women suckling their infants during a long time ; but it is highly probable that savages, who often suffer much hardship, and who do not obtain so much nutritious food as civilized men, would be actually less prolific. I have shown in a former work,f that all our domesticated quad- rupeds and birds, and all our cultivated plants, are more fertile than the corresponding species in a state of nature. * Bee the ever memorable " Essay on the Principle of Population," by the Rev. T. Malthus, vol. i, 1826, pp. 6, 517. f " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, pp. 111-113, 163. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 51 It is no valid objection to this conclusion that animals sud- denly supplied with an excess of food, or when grown very fat, and that most plants on sudden removal from very poor to very rich soil, are rendered more or less sterile. We might, therefore, expect that civilized men, who in one sense are highly domesticated, would be more prolific than wild men. It is also probable that the increased fertility of civilized nations would become, as with our domestic animals, an inherited character : it is at least known that with mankind a tendency to produce twins runs in families.* Notwithstanding that savages appear to be less prolific than civilized people, they would no doubt rapidly increase if their numbers were not by some means rigidly kept down. The Santali, or hill-tribes of India, have recently afforded a good illustration of this fact ; for, as shown by Mr. Hunter, f they have increased at an extraordinary rate since vaccination has been introduced, other pestilences mitigated, and war sternly repressed. This increase, however, would not have been possible had not these rude people spread into the adjoining districts, and worked for hire. Savages almost always marry ; yet there is some prudential restraint, for they do not commonly marry at the earliest possible age. The young men are often required to show that they can support a wife ; and they generally have first to earn the price with which to purchase her from her parents. With savages the difficulty of obtaining subsistence occasionally limits their number in a much more direct manner than with civilized people, for all tribes periodically suffer from severe famines. At such times savages are forced to devour much bad food, and their health can hardly fail to be injured. Many accounts have been published of their pro- truding stomachs and emaciated limbs after and during famines. They are then, also, compelled to wander much, and, as I was assured in Australia, their infants perish in large numbers. As famines are periodical, depending chiefly on extreme seasons, all tribes must fluctuate in number. They cannot steadily and regularly increase, as there is no artificial increase in the supply of food. Sav- ages, when hard pressed, encroach on each other's terri- tories, and war is the result ; but they are indeed almost *Mr. Sedgwick, "British and Foreign Medico-Chirurg. Eeview," July, 1863, p. 170. f " The Annals of Rural Bengal," by W. W. Hunter, 1868, p. 259. 52 THE DESCENT OF MAN. always at war with their neighbors. They are liable to many accidents on land and water in their search for food ; and in some countries they suffer much from the larger beasts of prey. Even in India, districts have been depop- ulated by the ravages of tigers. Malthus has discussed these several checks, but he does not lay stress enough on what is probably the most import- ant of all, namely, infanticide, especially of female infants, and the habit of procuring abortion. These practices now Ere vail in many quarters of the world; and infanticide seems mnerly to have prevailed, as Mr. M'Lennan* has shown, on a still more extensive scale. These practices appear to have originated in savages recognizing the difficulty, or rather the impossibility of supporting all the infants that are born. Licentiousness may also be added to the forego- ing checks; but this does not follow from failing means of subsistence; though there is reason to believe that in some cases (as in Japan) it has been intentionally encouraged as a means of keeping down the population. If we look back to an extremely remote epoch, before man had arrived at the dignity of manhood, he would have been guided more by instinct and less by reason than are the lowest savages at the present time. Our early semi- human progenitors would not have practiced infanticide or polyandry; for the instincts of the lower animals are never so perverted f as to lead them regularly to destroy their own offspring, or to be quite devoid of jealousy. There would have been no prudential restraint from marriage, and the sexes would have freely united at an early age. Hence the progenitors of man would have tended to increase rapidly; * " Primitive Marriage," 1865. f A writer in the " Spectator " (March 12, 1871, p. 320) comments as follows on this passage: "Mr. Darwin finds himself compelled to reintroduce a new doctrine of the fall of man. He shows that the instincts of the higher animals are far nobler than the habits of sav- age races of men, and he finds himself, therefore, compelled to re- introduce in a form of the substantial orthodoxy of which he appears to be quite unconscious and to introduce as a scientific hypothesis the doctrine that man's gain of knowledge was the cause of a temporary but long-enduring moral deterioration, as indicated by the many foul customs, especially as to marriage, of savage tribes. What does the Jewish tradition of the moral degeneration of man through his snatching at a knowledge forbidden him by his highest instinct assert beyond this t " s MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 53 but checks of some kind, either periodical or constant, must have kept down their numbers, even more severely than with existing savages. What the precise nature of these checks were we cannot say, any more than with most other animals. We know that horses and cattle, which are not extremely prolific animals, when first turned loose in South America, increased at an enormous rate. The elephant, the slowest breeder of all known animals, would in a few thousand years stock the whole world. The increase of every species of monkey must be checked by some means; but not, as Brehm remarks, by the attacks of beasts of >rey. No one will assume that the actual power of repro- uction in the wild horses and cattle of America, was at first in any sensible degree increased; or that, as each dis- trict became fully stocked, this same power was diminished. No doubt in this case, and in all others, many checks con- cur, and different checks under different circumstances; periodical dearths, depending on unfavorable seasons, being probably the most important of all. So it will have been with the early progenitors of man. Natural Selection. We have now seen that man is vari- able in body and mind; and that the variations are induced, either directly or indirectly, by the same general causes, and obey the same general laws, as with the lower animals. Man has spread widely over the face of the earth, and must have been exposed, during his incessant migrations,* to the most diversified conditions. The inhabitants of Tierra del Fuego, the Cape of Good Hope, and Tasmania in the one hemisphere, and of the Arctic regions in the other, must have passed through many climates, and changed their habits many times, before they reached their present homes, f The early progenitors of man must also have tended, like all other animals, to have increased beyond their means of subsistence; they must, therefore, occasionally have been exposed to a struggle for existence, and consequently to the rigid law of natural selection. Beneficial variations of all kinds will thus, either occasionally or habitually, have been preserved and injurious ones eliminated. I do not refer to strongly marked deviations of structure, which occur only * See some good remarks to this effect by W. Stanley Jevons, "A Deduction from Darwin's Theory," " Nature," 1869, p. 231. f Latham, "Man and his Migrations," 1851, p. 135. 54 THE DESCENT OF MAN. at long intervals of time, but to mere individual differences. We know, for instance, that the muscles of our hands and feet, which determine our powers of movement, are liable, like those of the lower animals,* to incessant variability. If then the progenitors of man inhabiting any district, es- pecially one undergoing some change in its conditions, were divided into two equal bodies, the one-half which included all the individuals best adapted by their powers of move- ment for gaining subsistence, or for defending themselves, would on an average survive in greater numbers, and pro- create more offspring than the other and less well endowed half. Man in the rudest state in which he now exists is the most dominant animal that has ever appeared on this earth. He has spread more widely than any other highly organized form: and all others have yielded before him. He mani- festly owes this immense superiority to his intellectual fac- ulties, to his social habits, which lead him to aid and defend his fellows, and to his corporeal structure. The supreme Importance of these characters has been proved by the final arbitrament of the battle for life. Through his powers of intellect, articulate language has been evolved; and on this his wonderful advancement has mainly depended. As Mr. Chauncey Wright remarks :f""* f a psychological analysis of the faculty of language shows, that even the smallest pro- ficiency in it might require more brain power than the greatest proficiency in any other direction." He has in- vented and is able to use various weapons, tools, traps, etc., with which he defends himself, kills or catches prey, and otherwise obtains food. He has made rafts or canoes for fishing or crossing over to neighboring fertile islands. He has discovered the art of making fire, by which hard and stringy roots can be rendered digestible, and poisonous roots or herbs innocuous. This discovery of fire, probably the greatest ever made by man, excepting language, dates from before the dawn of history. These several inventions, by * Messrs. Murie and Mivart in their " Anatomy of the Lemuroidea " ("Transact. Zoolog. Soc.," vol. vii, 1869, pp. 96-98) say, "some muscles are so irregular in their distribution that they cannot be well classed in any of the above groups." These muscles differ even on the opposite sides of the same individual. f Limits of Natural Selection, "North American Review," Oct. 1870, p. S95. MANNER OP DEVELOPMENT. 55 which, man in the rudest state has become so pre-eminent, are the direct results of the development of his powers of observation, memory, curiosity, imagination, and reason. I cannot, therefore, understand how it is that Mr. Wallace* maintains, that " natural selection could only have endowed the savage with a brain a little superior to that of an ape." Although the intellectual powers and social habits of man are of paramount importance to him, we must not un- derrate the importance of his bodily structure, to which subject the remainder of this chapter will be devoted; the development of the intellectual and social or moral facul- ties being discussed in a later chapter. Even to hammer with precision is no easy matter, as every one who has tried to learn carpentry will admit. To throw a stone with as true an aim as a Fuegian in defend- ing himself, or in killing birds, requires the most consum- mate perfection in the correlated action of the muscles of the hand, arm, and shoulder, and, further, a fine sense of touch. In throwing a stone or spear, and in many other actions, a man must stand firmly on his feet; and this again demands the perfect co-adaptation of numerous muscles. To chip a flint into the rudest tool, or to form a barbed spear or hook from a bone, demands the use of a perfect hand; for, as a most capable judge, Mr. Schoolcraft,f re- marks, the shaping fragments of stone into knives, lances, or arrow-heads, shows ''extraordinary ability and long * " Quarterly Review," April, 1869, p. 392. This subject is more fully discussed in Mr. Wallace's " Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection," 1870, in which all the essays referred to in this work are republished. The " Essay on Man," has been ably criti- cized by Prof. Claparede, one of the most distinguished zoologists in Europe, in an article published in the " Bibliotheque Universelle," June, 1870. The remark quoted in my text will surprise every one who has read Mr. Wallace's celebrated paper on ' ' The Origin of Human Races deduced from the Theory of Natural Selection," orig- inally published in the "Anthropological Review," May, 1864, p. clviii. I cannot here resist quoting a most just remark by Sir J. Lubbock ("Prehistoric Times," 1865, p. 479) in reference to this paper, namely, that Mr. Wallace, "with characteristic unselfishness, ascribes it (i. e. the idea of natural selection) unreservedly to Mr. Darwin, although, as is well known, he struck out the idea inde- pendently, and published it, though not with the same elaboration, at the same time." f Quoted by Mr. Lawson Tait in his "Law of Natural Selection," "Dublin Quarterly Journal of Medical Science," Feb., 1869. Dr. Keller is likewise" quoted to the same effect. 56 THE DESCENT Off MAN. practice. " This is to a great extent proved by the fact that primeval men practiced a division of labor ; each man did not manufacture his own flint tools or rude pottery, but certain individuals appear to have devoted themselves to such work, no doubt receiving in exchange the produce of the chase. Archaeologists are convinced that an enormous interval of time elapsed before our ancestors thought of grinding chipped flints into smooth tools. One can hardly doubt, that a man-like animal who possessed a hand and arm sufficiently perfect to throw a stone with precision, 01 to form a flint into a rude tool, could, with sufficient prac- tice, as far as mechanical skill alone is concerned, make almost any thing which a civilized man can make. The structure of the hand in this respect may be compared with that of the vocal organs, which in the apes are used for uttering various signal-cries, or, as in one genus, musical cadences; but in man the closely similar vocal organs have become adapted through the inherited effects of use for the utterance of articulate language. Turning now to the nearest allies of men, and therefore to the best representatives of our early progenitors, we find that the hands of the Quadrumana are constructed on the same general pattern as our own, but are far less perfectly adapted for diversified uses. Their hands do not serve for locomotion so well as the feet of a dog; as may be seen in such monkeys as the chimpanzee and orang, which walk on the outer margins of the palms, or on the knuckles.* Their hands, however, are admirably adapted for climbing trees. Monkeys seize thin branches or ropes, with the thumb on one side and the fingers and palm on the other, in the same manner as we do. They can thus also lift rather large objects, such as the neck of a bottle, to their mouths. Baboons turn over stones, and scratch up roots with their hands. They seize nuts, insects, or other small objects with the thumb in opposition to the fingers, and no doubt they thus extract eggs and the young from the nests of birds. American monkeys beat the wild oranges on the branches until the rind is cracked, and then tear it off with the fingers of the two hands. In a wild state they break open hard fruits with stones. Other monkeys open mussel- enells with the two thumbs. With their fingers they pull *0wen, " Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 71. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 57 out thorns and burrs, and hunt for each other's parasites. They roll down stones, or throw them at their enemies: nevertheless, they are clumsy in these various actions, and, as I have myself seen, are quite unable to throw a stone with precision. It seems to me far from true that because ( ' objects are grasped clumsily" by monkeys, "a much less specialized organ of prehension " would have served them* equally well with their present hands. On the contrary, I see no reason to doubt that more perfectly constructed hands would have been an advantage to them, provided that they were not thus rendered less fitted f or x climbing trees. We may sus- pect that a hand as perfect as that of man would have been disadvantageous for climbing; for the most arboreal mon- keys in the world, namely, Ateles, in America, Oolobus, in Africa, and Hylobates, in Asia, are either thumbless, or their toes partially cohere, so that their limbs are converted into mere grasping hooks, f As soon as some ancient member in the great series of the Primates came to be less arboreal, owing to a change in its manner of procuring subsistence, or to some change in the surrounding conditions, its habitual manner .of progression would have been modified; and thus it would have been rendered more strictly quadrupedal or bipedal. Baboons frequent hilly and rocky districts, and only from necessity climb high trees ; J and they have acquired almost the gait of a dog. Man alone has become a biped; and we can, I think, partly see how he has come to assume his erect atti- tude, which forms one of his most conspicuous characters. Man could not have attained his present dominant position in the world Avithout the use of his hands, which are so admirably adapted to act in obedience to his will. Sir C. Bell insists that "the hand supplies all instruments, and *" Quarterly Review," April, 1869, p. 392. f In Hylobates syndactylus, as the name expresses, two of the toes regularly cohere ; and this, as Mr. Blyth informs me, is occasionally the case with the toes of H. agilis, lar, and leucisciis. Colobus is strictly arboreal and extraordinarily active (Brehin, " Thierleben," B. i, s. 50), but whether a better climber than the species of the allied genera, I do not know. It deserves notice that the feet of the sloths, the most arboreal animals in the world, are wonderfully hook-like. $ Brehm, "Thierleben," B. i, s. 80. " The Hand," etc. " Bridgewater Treatise," 1833, p. 88. 58 THE DESCENT OF MAN. by its correspondence with the intellect gives him universal dominion." But the hands and arms could hardly have become perfect enough to ''have manufactured weapons, or to have hurled stones and spears with a true aim, as long as they were habitually used for locomotion and for supporting the whole weight of the body, or, as before remarked, so long as they were especially fitted for climbing trees. Such rough treatment would also have blunted the sense of touch, on which their delicate use largely depends. From these causes alone it would have been an advantage to man to become a biped,; but for many actions it is indispensable that the arms and whole upper part of the body should be free; and he must for this end stand firmly on his feet. To gain this great advantage, the feet have been rendered flat; and the great toe has been peculiarly modified, though this has entailed the almost complete loss of its power of pre- hension. It accords with the principle of the division of physiological labor, prevailing throughout the animal kingdom, that as the hands became perfected for prehen- sion, the feet should have became perfected for support and locomotion. With some savages, however, the foot has not altogether lost its prehensile power, as shown by their manner of climbing trees and of using them in other ways.* If it be an advantage to man to stand firmly on his feet and to have his hands and arms free, of which, from his pre-eminent success in the battle of life, there can be no doubt, then I can see no reason why it should not have been advantageous to the progenitors of man to have become more and more erect or bipedal. They would thus have been better able to defend themselves with stones or clubs, to attack their prey, or otherwise to obtain food. The best built individuals would in the long run have succeeded best and have survived in larger numbers. If the gorilla and a few allied forms had become extinct, it might have been argued, with great force and apparent truth, that an * HRckel has an excellent discussion on the steps by which man became a biped: "Natiirliche Schopfungsgeschichte," 1868, s. 507. Dr. Biichner ("Conferences sur la Th6orie Darwinienne," 1869, p. 185) has given good cases of the use of the foot as a prehensile organ by man ; and has also written on the manner of progression of the higher apes, to which I allude in the following paragraph ; see also Owen (" Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 71) on this latter subject. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. k 59 animal could not have been gradually converted from a quadruped into a biped, as all the individuals in an inter- mediate condition would have been miserably ill-fitted for progression. But we know (and this is well worthy of re- flection) that the anthropomorphous apes are now actually in an intermediate condition ; and no one doubts that they are on the whole well adapted for their conditions of life. Thus the gorilla runs with a sidelong shambling gait, but more commonly progresses by resting on its bent hands. The long-armed apes occasionally use their arms like crutches, swinging their bodies forward between them, and gome kinds of Hylobates, without having been taught, can walk or run upright with tolerable quickness ; yet they move awkwardly and much less securely than man. We pee, in short, in existing monkeys a manner of progression intermediate between that of a quadruped and a biped; but, as an unprejudiced judge* insists, the anthropo- morphous apes approach in structure more nearly to the bipedal than to the quadrupedal type. As the progenitors of man became more and more erect, with their hands and arms more and more modified for urehension and other purposes, with their feet and legs at the same time transformed for firm support and progres- sion, endless other changes of structure would have be- come necessary. The pelvis would have to be broadened, the spine peculiarly curved, and the head fixed m an altered position, all of which changes have been attained by man. Prof. Schaaffhausenf maintains that " the pow- erful masicoia processes of the human skull are the result of his erect position;" and these processes are absent in the orang, chimpanzee, etc., and are smaller in the go- rilla than in man. Various other structures, which appear connected with man's erect position, might here have been added. It is very difficult to decide how far these corre- lated modifications are the result of natural selection, and how far of the inherited effects of the increased use of cer- tain, parts or of the action of one part on another. * Prof. Broca, La Constitution des Vertebres caudales ; " La Revue d' knthropologie," 1872, p. 26 (separate copy). f " On the Primitive Form of the Skull," translated in " Anthrop- ological Eeview,"Oct 1868, p. 438. Owen ("Anatomy of Verte- brates," vol. ii, 1866, p. 551) on the ruastoid processes in the higher apes. 60 THE DESCENT OF MAN. No doubt these means of change often co-operate; when certain muscles, and the crests of bone to which they are attached, become enlarged by habitual use, this shows that certain actions are habitually performed and must be serviceable. Hence the individuals which per- formed them best would tend to survive in greater numbers- The free use of the arms and hands, partly the cause and partly the result of man's erect position, appears to have led in an indirect manner to other modifications of structure. The early male forefathers of man were, as previously stated, probably furnished with great canine teeth; but as they gradually acquired the habit of using stones, clubs, or other weapons for fighting with their enemies or rivals they would use their jaws and teeth less and less. In this case the jaws, together with the teeth, would become reduced in size, as we may feel almost sure from innumerable analogous cases. In a future chapter we shall meet Avith a closely parallel case in the reduction or complete disappearance of the canine teeth in male ruminants, apparently in relation with the development of their horns; and in horses in relation to their habits of fighting with their incisor teeth and hoofs. In the adult male anthropomorphous apes, as Riiti- meyer* and others have insisted, it is the effect on the skull of the great development of the jaw-muscles that causes it to differ so greatly in many respects from that of man, and has given to these animals " a truly frightful physi- ognomy." Therefore, as the jaws and teeth in man's pro- genitors gradually become reduced in size, the adult skull would have come to resemble more and more that of exist- ing man. As we shall hereafter see, a great reduction of the canine teeth in the males would almost certainly affect the teeth of the females through inheritance. As the various mental faculties gradually developed themselves the brain would almost certainly become larger. No one, I presume, doubts that the la-'ge proportion which the size of man's brain bears to his body, compared to the same proportion in the gorilla or orang, is closely connected with his higher mental powers. We meet with closely analogous facts with insects, for in ants the cerebral gan- glia are of extraordinary dimensions, and in all the Hyme- *"Die Grenzen der Thierwelt, eine Betrachtung zu Darwin's Lhre," 1868, s. 51. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 61 noptera these ganglia are many times larger than in the less intelligent orders, such as beetles.* On the other hand, no one supposes that the intellect of any two ani- mals or of any two men can be accurately gauged by the cubic contents of their skulls. It is certain that there may be extraordinary mental activity with an extremely small absolute mass of nervous matter: thus the wonder- fully diversified instincts, mental powers and affections of ants are notorious, yet their cerebral ganglia are not so large as the quarter of a small pin's head. Under this point of view the brain of an ant is one of the most mar- velous atoms of matter in the world, perhaps more so than the brain of a man. The belief that there exists in man some close relation between the size of the brain and the development of the intellectual faculties is supported by the comparison of the skulls of savage and civilized races, of ancient and modern people, and by the analogy of the whole vertebrate series. Dr. J. Barnard Davis has proved, f by many careful meas- urements, that the mean internal capacity of the skull in Europeans is 92.3 cubic inches; in Americans 87.5; in Asiatics 87.1; and in Australians only 81.9 cubic inches. Professor Broca J found that the nineteenth century skulls from graves in Paris were larger than those from vaults of the twelfth century, in the proportion of 1484 to 1426; and that the increased size, as ascertained by meas- urements, was exclusively in the frontal part of the skull the seat of the intellectual faculties. Prichard is per- suaded that the present inhabitants of Britain have " much more capacious brain-cases " than the ancient in- habitants. Nevertheless, it must be admitted that some skulls of very high antiquity, such as the famous one of Neanderthal, are well developed and capacious. With *Dujardin, " Annales des Sc. Nat.," 3d series Zoolog. torn, xiv, 1850, p. 203. See also Mr. Lowne, " Anatomy and Phys. of the Musca vomitoria," 1870, p. 14. My son, Mr. F. Darwin," dissected for me the cerebral ganglia of the Formica rufa. f " Philosophical Transactions," 1869, p. 513. j " Les Selections," M. P. Broca, " Revue d'Anthropologies," 1873 ; see also, as quoted in C. Vogt's " Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., 1864, pp. 88, 90. Prichard, Phys. Hist, of Mankind," vol. i, 1838, p. 305. In the interesting article just referred to, Prof. Broca has well remarked, that in civilized nations*.the average capacity of the skull 62 THE DESCENT OF MAN. respect to the lower animals, M. E. Lartet,* by comparing th crania of tertiary and recent mammals belonging to the same groups, has come to the remarkable conclusion that the brain is generally larger and the convolutions are more complex in the more recent forms. On the other hand, I have shown f that the brains of domestic rabbits are considerably reduced in bulk, in comparison with those of the wild rabbit or hare; and this may be attributed to their having been closely confined during many genera- tions, so that they have exerted their intellect, instincts, senses and voluntary movements but little. The gradually increasing weight of the brain and skull in man must have influenced the development of the sup- porting spinal column, more especially while he was becom- ing erect. As this change of position was being brought about, the internal pressure of the brain will also have in- fluenced the form of the skull; for many facts show how easily the skull is thus affected. Ethnologists believe that it is modified by the kind of cradle in which infants sleep. Habitual spasms of the muscles, and a cicatrix from a se- vere burn, have permanently modified the facial bones. In young persons whose heads have become fixed either side- ways or backward, owing to disease, one of the two eyes has changed its position, and the shape of the skull has been altered apparently by the pressure of the brain in a new direction.^ I have shown that with long-eared rabbits must be lowered by the preservation of a considerable number of in- dividuals, weak in mind and body, who would have been promptly eliminated in the savage state. On the other hand, with savages, the average includes only the more capable individuals, who have been able to survive under extremely hard conditions of life. Broca thus explains the otherwise inexplicable fact, that the mean capacity of the skull of the ancient Troglodytes of Lozere is greater than that of modern Frenchmen. * " Comptes-rendus des Sciences," etc., June 1, 1868. J"The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," . i, pp. 124-129. J Schaaffhausen gives from Blumenbach and Busch, the cases of the spasms and cicatrix, in " Anthropolog. Review," Oct. 1868, p. 420. Dr. Jarrold (" Anthropologia," 1808, pp. 115, 116) adduces from Camper and from his own observations, cases of the modification of the skull from the head being fixod in an unnatural position. He believes that in certain trades, such as that of a shoemaker, where the head is habitually held forward, the forehead becomes more rounded and prominent. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 63 even so trifling a cause as the lopping forward of one ear drags forward almost every bone of the skull on that side; so that the bones on the opposite side no longer strictly correspond. Lastly, if any animal were to increase or diminish much in general size, without any change in its mental powers, or if the mental powers were to be much increased or diminished, without any great change in the size of the body, the shape of the skull would almost cer- tainly be altered. I infer this from my observations on domestic rabbits, some kinds of which have become very much larger than the wild animal, while others have re- tained nearly the same size, but in both cases the brain has been much reduced relatively to the size of the body. Now I was at first much surprised on finding that in all these rabbits the skull had become elongated or dolichocephalic; for instance, of two skulls of nearly equal breadth, the one from a wild rabbit and the other from a large domestic kind, the former was 3.15 and the latter 4.3 inches in length.* One of the most marked distinctions in different races of men is that the skull in some is elongated and in others rounded ; and here the explanation suggested by the case of the rabbits may hold good; for Welcker finds that short " men incline more to brachycephaty, and tall men to dolichocephaly;"f and tall men may be compared with the larger and longer-bodied rabbits, all of which have elongated skulls, or are dolichocephalic. From these several facts we can understand, to a certain extent, the means by which the great size and more or less rounded form of the skull have been acquired by man; and these are characters eminently distinctive of him in com- parison with the lower animals. Another most conspicuous difference between man and the lower animals is the nakedness of his skin. "Whales and porpoises (Cetacea), dugongs (Sirenia) and the hippo- potamus are naked; and this may be advantageous to them for gliding through the water; nor would it be injurious to them from the loss of warmth, as the species which in- habit the colder regions are protected by a thick layer of blubber, serving the same purpose as the fur of seals and *" Variation of Animals," etc., vol. i, p. 117, on the elongation of tlie skull ; p. 119, on tlie effect of the lopping of one ear. (Quoted by Schaaffhausen, in " Anthropolog. Review," Oct., 1868, p. 419. 64 THE DESCENT OF MAN. otters. Elephants and rhinoceroses are almost hairless; and as certain extinct species, which formerly lived under an Arctic climate., were covered with long wool or hair, it would almost appear as if the existing species of both genera had lost their hairy covering from exposure to heat. This appears the more probable, as the elephants in India which live on elevated and cool districts are more hairy * than those on the lowlands. May we then infer that man became divested of hair from having aboriginally inhabited some tropical land? That the hair is chiefly retained in the male sex on the chest and face, and in both sexes at the junction of all four limbs with the trunk, favors this inference on the assumption that the hair was lost before man became erect; for the parts which now retain most hair would then have been most protected from the heat of the sun. The crown of the head, however, offers a curious exception, for at all times it must have been one of the most exposed parts, yet is thickly clothed with hair. The fact, however, that the other members of the order of Primates, to which man belongs, although inhabiting various hot regions, are well clothed with hair, generally thickest on the upper surface, f is opposed to the supposi- tion that man became naked through the action of the sun. Mr. Belt believes J that within the tropics it is an advant- age to man to be destitute of hair, as he is thus enabled to free himself of the multitude of ticks (acari) and other parasites, with which he is often infested, and which some- times cause ulceration. But whether this evil is of suffi- cient magnitude to have led to the denudation of his body through natural selection, may be doubted, since none of the many quadrupeds inhabiting the tropics have, as far as *0wen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 619. f Isidore Geoffrey St.-Hilaire remarks ("Hist. Nat. Generate," torn, ii, 1859, pp. 215-317) on the head of man being covered with long hair ; also on the upper surfaces of monkeys and of other mammals being more thickly clothed than the lower surfaces. This has like- wise been observed by various authors. Prof. P. Gervais (" Hist. Nat. des Mammiferes," torn, i, 1854, p. 28), however, states that in the gorilla the hair is thinner on the back where it is partly rubbed off, than on the lower surface. | The " Naturalist in Nicaragua," 1874, p. 209. As some confirma- tion of Mr. Belt's view, I may quote the following passage from Sir W. Denison ("Varieties of Vice-Regal Life," vol. i, 1870, p. 440): " It is said to be a practice with the Australians, when the vermin gt troublesome, to singe themselves." MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 65 I know, acquired any specialized means of relief. The view which seems to me the most probable is that man, or rather primarily woman, became divested of hair for orna- mental purposes, as we shall see under Sexual Selection, and, according to this belief, it is not surprising that man should differ so greatly in hairiness from all other Primates, for characters, gained through sexual selection, often differ to an extraordinary degree in closely related forms. According to a popular impression, the absence of a tail is eminently distinctive of man ; but as those apes which come nearest to him are destitute of this organ its disap- pearance does not relate exclusively to man. The tail often differs remarkably in length within the same genus : thus in some species of Macacus it is longer than the whole body, and is formed of twenty-four vertebrae; in others it consists of a scarcely visible stump, containing only three or four vertebrae. In some kinds of baboons there are twenty-five, while in the mandrill there are ten very small stunted caudal vertebrae, or, according to 'Cuvier,* some-- times only five. The tail, whether it be long or short, almost always tapers toward the end ; and this, I presume, results from the atrophy of the terminal muscles, together with their arteries and nerves, through disuse, leading to the atrophy of the terminal bones. But no explanation can at present be given of the great diversity which often occurs in its length. Here, however, we are more specially concerned with the complete external disappearance of the tail. Prof. Broca has recently shownf that the tail in all quadrupeds consists of two portions, generally separated abruptly from each other; the basal portion consists of vertebrae, more or less perfectly channeled and furnished with apophyses like ordinary vertebrae; whereas those of the terminal portion are not channeled, are almost smooth, and scarcely resemble true vertebrae. A tail, though not externally visible, is really present in man and the anthro- pomorphous apes, and is constructed on exactly the same pattern in both. In the terminal portion of the vertebrae, *Mr. St. George Mivart, " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1865, pp. 562, 583. Dr. J. B. Gray, "Cat. Brit. Mus.: Skeletons." Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. ii, p. 517. Isidore Geoffroy "Hist. Nat. G6n." toru. ii, p. 244. f " Revue d'Anthropologie," 1872 ; " La Constitution des Vertebras caudales." 66 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. constituting the os coccyx, are quite rudimentary, being much reduced in size and. number. In the basal portion, the vertebrae are likewise few, are united firmly together, and are arrested in development ; but they have been ren- dered much broader and flatter than the corresponding vertebras in the tails of other animals ; they constitute what Broca calls the accessory sacral vertebras. These are of functional importance by supporting certain internal parts and in other ways ; and their modification is directly connected with the erect or semi-erect attitude of man and the anthropomorphous apes. This conclusion is the more trustworthy, as Broca formerly held a different view, which he has now abandoned. The modification, therefore, of the basal caudal vertebras in man and the higher apes may have been affected, directly or indirectly, through natural selection. But what are we to say about the rudimentary and variable vertebras of the terminal portion of the tail, form- ing the os coccyx ? A notion which has often been, and will no doubt again be, ridiculed, namely, that friction has had something to do with the disappearance of the external portion of the tail, is not so ridiculous as it at first appears. Dr. Anderson* states that the extremely short tail of Maca- cus brunneus is formed of eleven vertebras, including the imbedded basal ones. The extremity is tendinous and contains no vertebras; this is succeeded by five rudimentary ones, so minute that together they are only one line and a half in length, and these are permanently bent to one side in the shape of a hook. The free part of the tail, only a little above an inch in length, includes only four more small vertebras. This short tail is carried erect; but about a quarter of its total length is doubled on to itself to the left; and this terminal part, which includes the hook-like portion, serves " to fill up the interspace between the upper divergent portion of the calosities;" so that the animal sits on it and thus renders it rough and callous. Dr. Anderson thus sums up his observations : " These facts seem to me to have only one explanation; this tail, from its short size, is in the monkey's way when it sits down, and frequently becomes placed under the animal while it is in this atti- tude; and from the circumstance that it does not extend * M Proc. Zoolog._Soc." 1872, p. 210. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 67 beyond the extremity of the ischial tuberosities, it seems as if the tail originally had been bent round by the will of the animal, into the interspace between the callosities, to es- cape being pressed between them and the ground, and that in time the curvature became permanent, fitting in of itself when the organ happens to be sat upon." Under these circumstances it is not surprising that the surface of the tail should have been roughened and rendered callous, and Dr. Murie,* who carefully observed this species in the Zoological Gardens, as well as three other closely allied forms with slightly longer tails, says that when the animal eits down the tail "is necessarily thrust to one side of the buttocks; and whether long or short its root is consequently liable to be rubbed or chafed." As we now have evidence that mutilations occasionally produce an inherited effect, f it is not very improbable that in short- tailed monkeys the projecting part of the tail, being functionally useless, should after many generations have become rudimentary and distorted, from being continually rubbed and chafed. We see the projecting part in this condition in the Maca- cus brunneus, and absolutely aborted in the M. ecaudatus and in several of the higher apes. Finally, then, as far as we can judge, the tail has disappeared in man and the anthropomorphous apes, owing to the terminal portion having been injured by friction during a long lapse of time; the basal and embedded portion having been reduced and modified so as to become suitable to the erect or semi-erect position. I have now endeavored to show that some of the most iistinctive characters of man have in all probability been acquired, either directly, or more commonly indirectly, through natural selection. We should bear in mind that modifications in structure or constitution which do not serve to adapt an organism to its habits of life, to the food *"Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1872, p. 786. f I allude to Dr. Brown-Sequard's obseivations on the transmitted effect of an operation causing epilepsy in guinea-pigs, and likewise more recently on the analogous effects of cutting the sympathetic nerve in the neck. I shall hereafter have occasion to refer to Mr. Salvin's interesting case of the apparently inherited effects of mot- mots biting off the barbs of their own tail-feathers. See also on the general subject "Variation of Auimals and Plants under Domesti- cation," vol. U, pp. 28-24 68 THE DESCENT OF MAN. which it consumes, or passively to the surrounding con- ditions, cannot have been, thus acquired. We must not, however, be too confident in deciding what modifications are of service to each being; we should remember how little we know about the use of many parts, or what changes in the blood or tissues may serve to fit an organism for a new climate or new kinds of food. Nor must we forget the principle of correlation, by which, as Isidore Geofl'roy has shown in the case of man, many strange deviations ot structure are tied together. Independently of correlation; a change in one part often leads, through the increased 01 decreased use of other parts, to other changes of a quite unexpected nature. It is also well to reflect on such facts, as the wonderful growth of galls on plants caused by the poison of an insect, and on the remarkable changes of color in the plumage of parrots when fed on certain fishes, or inoculated with the poison of toads; * for we can thus see that the fluids of the system, if altered for some special purpose, might induce other changes. We should especially bear in mind that modifications acquired and continually used daring past ages for some useful purpose, would probably become firmly fixed, and might be long inherited. Thus a large yet undefined extension may safely be given to the direct and indirect results of natural selection; but I now admit, after reading the essay by Nageli on plants, and the remarks by various authors with respect to ani- mals, more especially those recently made by Prof. Broca, that in the earlier editions of my "Origin of Species" I perhaps attributed too much to the action of natural selec- tion or the survival of the fittest. I have altered the fifth edition of the "Origin "so as to confine my remarks to adaptive changes of structure; but I am convinced, from the light gained during even the last few years, that very many structures which now appear to us useless, will here- after be proved to be useful, and will therefore come within the range of natural selection. Nevertheless, I did not formerly consider sufficiently the existence of structures, which, as far as we can at present judge, are neither bene- ficial nor injurious; and this I believe to be one of the greatest oversights as yet detected in my work. I may be * " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, pp. 280, 282. MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 69 permitted to say, as some excuse, that I had two distinct objects in view; firstly, to show that species had not been separately created, and secondly, that natural selection had been the chief agent of change, though largely aided by the inherited effects of habit, and slightly by the direct action of the surrounding conditions. I was not, however, able to annul the influence of my former belief, then almost universal, that each species had been purposely created; and this led to my tacit assumption that every de- tail of structure, excepting rudiments, was of some special, though unrecognized, service. Any one with this assump- tion in his mind would naturally extend too far the action of natural selection, either during past or present times. Some of those who admit the principle of evolution, but reject natural selection, seem to forget, when criticising my book, that I had the above two objects in view; hence, if I have erred in giving to natural selection great power, which I am very far from admitting, or in having exagger- ated its power, which is in itself probable, I have at least, as I hope, done good service in aiding to overthrow the dogma of separate creations. It is, as I can now see, probable that all organic beings, including man, possess peculiarities of structure, which neither are now, nor were formerly of any service to them, and which, therefore, are of no physiological im- portance. We know not what produces the numberless slight differences between the individuals of each species, for reversion only carries the problem a few steps back- ward, but each peculiarity must have had its efficient cause. If these causes, whatever they may be, were to act more uniformly and energetically during a lengthened period (and against this no reason can be assigned), the re- sult would probably be not a mere slight individual differ- ence, but a well-marked and constant modification, though one of no physiological importance. Changed structures, which are in no way beneficial, cannot be kept uniform through natural selection, though the injurious will be thus eliminated. Uniformity of character would, however, naturally follow from the assumed uniformity of the excit- ing causes, and likewise from the free intercrossing of many individuals. During successive periods, the same organism might in this manner acquire successive modifi- cations, which would be transmitted in a nearly uniform 70 THE DESCENT OF MAN. state as long as the exciting causes remained the same and there was free intercrossing. With respect to the exciting causes we can only say, as when speaking of so-called spon- taneous variations, that they relate much more closely to the constitution of the varying organism, than to the nature of the conditions to which it has been subjected. Conclusion. In this chapter we have seen that as man at the present day is liable, like every other animal, to mul- tiform individual differences or slight variations, so no doubt were the early progenitors of man; the variations being formerly induced by the same general causes, and governed by the same general and complex laws as at present. As all animals tend to multiply beyond their means of subsistence, so it must have been with the pro- genitors of man; and this would inevitably lead to a strug- gle for existence and to natural selection. The latter pro- cess would be greatly aided by the inherited effects of the increased use of parts, and these two processes would in- cessantly react on each other. It appears, also, as we shall hereafter see, that various unimportant characters have been acquired by man through sexual selection. An unex- plained residuum of change must be left to the assumed uniform action of those unknown agencies, which occasion- ally induce strongly marked and abrupt deviations of struc- ture in our domestic productions. Judging from the habits of savages and of the greater number of the Quadrumana, primeval men, and even their ape-like progenitors, probably lived in society. With strictly social animals, natural selection sometimes 'acts on the individual, through the preservation of vari- ations which are beneficial to the community. A com- munity which includes a large number of well-endowed individuals increases in number, and is victorious over other less favored ones ; even although each separate member gains no advantage over the others of the same community. Associated insects have thus acquired many remarkable structures, which are of little or no service to the individual, such as the pollen-collecting appa- ratus, or the sting of the worker-bee, or the great jaws of soldier-ants. With the higher social animals, I am not aware that any structure has been modified solely for the good of the community, though some are of secondary MANNER OF DEVELOPMENT. 71 service to it. For instance, the horns of ruminants and the great canine teeth of baboons appear to have been ac- quired by the males as weapons for sexual strife, but they are used in defense of the herd or troop. In regard to cer- tain mental powers the case, as we shall see in the fifth chapter, is wholly different; for these faculties have been chiefly, or even exclusively, gained for the benefit of the community, and the individuals thereof have at the same time gained an advantage indirectly. It has often been objected to such views as the forego- ing, that man is one of the most helpless and defenseless creatures in the world; and that during his early and less well developed condition he would have been still more helpless. The Duke of Argyll, for instance, insists* that "the human frame has diverged from the structure of brutes in the direction of greater physical helplessness and weakness. That is to say, it is a divergence which of all others it is most impossible to ascrible to mere natural selection." He adduces the naked and unprotected state of the body, the absence of great teeth or claws for de- fense, the small strength and speed of man, and his slight power of discovering food or of avoiding danger by smell. To these deficiencies there might be added one still more serious, namely, that he cannot climb quickly and so escape from enemies. The loss of hair would not have been a great injury to the inhabitants of a warm country. For we know that the unclothed Fuegians can exist under a wretched climate. When we compare the defenseless state of man with that of apes we must remember that the great canine teeth with which the latter are provided are possessed in their full development by the males alone, and are chiefly used by them for fighting with their rivals; yet the females, which are not thus provided, manage to survive. In regard to bodily size or strength, we do not know whether man is descended from some small species, like the chimpanzee, or from one as powerful as the gorilla; and, therefore, we cannot say whether man has become larger and stronger, or smaller and weaker than his ances- tors. We should, however, bear in mind that an "Primeval Man," 1869, p. 66. 72 THE DESCENT OF MAN. possessing great size, strength, and ferocity, and which, like the gorilla, could defend itself from all enemies, would not perhaps have become social: and this would most effect- ually have checked the acquirement of the higher mental qualities, such as sympathy and the love of his fellows. Hence it might have been an immense advantage to man to have sprung from some comparatively weak creature. The small strength and speed of man, his want of nat- ural weapons, etc., are more than counterbalanced, firstly, by his intellectual powers, through which he has formed for himself weapons, tools, etc., though still remaining in a barbarous state, and secondly, by his social qualities which lead him to give and receive aid from his fellow-men. No country in the world abounds in a greater degree with dan- gerous beasts than Southern Africa; no country presents more fearful physical hardships than the Arctic regions; yet one of the puniest of races, that of the Bushmen, main- tains itself in Southern Africa, as do the dwarfed Esqui- maux in the Arctic regions. The ancestors of man were, no doubt, inferior in intellect, and probably in social dis- position to the lowest existing savages; but it is quite con- ceivable that they might have existed, or even nourished, if they had advanced in intellect, while gradually losing their brute-like powers, such as that of climbing trees, etc. But these ancestors would not have been exposed to any special danger, even if far more helpless and defenseless than any existing savages, had they inhabited some warm continent or large island, such as Australia, New Guinea, or Borneo, which is now the home of the orang. And natural selection arising from the competition of tribe with tribe in some such large area as one of these, together with the inherited effects of habit, would, under favorable con- ditions, have sufficed to raise man to his present high position in the organic scale. MENTAL POWERS. 73 CHAPTER III. COMPARISON" OF THE MENTAL POWERS OF MAN AND THE LOWER ANIMALS. The difference in mental power between the highest ape and the lowest savage, immense Certain instincts in common The emotions Curiosity Imitation Attention Memory Imagi- nation Reason Progressive improvement Tools and weapons used by animals Abstraction, self-consciousness Language Sense of beauty Belief in God, spiritual agencies, superstitions. WE have seen in the last two chapters that man bears in his bodily structure clear traces of his descent from some lower form; but it maybe urged that, as man differs so greatly in his mental power from all other animals, there must be some error in this conclusion. No doubt the difference in this respect is enormous, even if we compare the mind of one of the lowest savages, who has no words to express any number higher than four, and who uses hardly any abstract terms for common objects or for the affections,* with that of the most highly organized ape. The difference would, no doubt, still remain immense, even if one of the higher apes had been improved or civilized as much as a dog has been in comparison with its parent-form, the wolf or jackal. The Fuegians rank among the lowest barbarians ; but I was continually struck with surprise how closely the three natives on board H.M.S. "Beagle," who had lived some years in England, and could talk a little English, resembled us in disposition and in most of our mental faculties. If no organic being excepting man had possessed any mental power, or if his powers had been of a wholly different nature from those of the lower animals, then we should never have been able to convince ourselves that our high faculties had been gradually developed. But * See the evidence on those points, as given by Lubbock, " Prehis- toric Times," p. 354, etc. ?4 THE DESCENT OF MAN. it can be shown that there is no fundamental difference of this kind. We must also admit that there is a much wider interval in mental power between one of the lowest fishes, as a lamprey or lancelet, and one of the higher apes, than between an ape and man; yet this interval is filled up by numberless gradations. Nor is the difference slight in moral disposition between a barbarian, such as the man described by the old navi- gator Byron, who dashed his child on the rocks for drop- ping a basket of sea-urchins, and a Howard or Clarkson; and in intellect, between a savage who uses hardly any ab- stract terms, and a Newton or Shakespeare. Differences of this kind between the highest men of the highest races and the lowest savages are connected by the finest grada- tions. Therefore it is possible that they might pass and be developed into each other. My object in this chapter is to show that there is no fun- damental difference between man and the higher mammals in their mental faculties. Each division of the subject might have been extended into a separate essay, but must here be treated briefly. As no classification of the mental powers has been universally accepted, I shall arrange my remarks in the order most convenient for my purpose; and will select those facts which have struck me most, with the hope that they may produce some effect on the reader. With respect to animals very low in the scale, I shall give some additional facts under Sexual Selection, showing that their mental powers are much higher than might have been expected. The variability of the faculties in the individ- uals of the same species is an important point for us, and some few illustrations will here be given. But it would be superfluous to enter into many details on this head, for I have found on frequent inquiry that it is the unanimous opinion of all those who have long attended to animals of many kinds, including birds, that the individuals differ greatly in every mental characteristic. In what manner the mental powers were first developed in the lowest organ- isms, is as hopeless an inquiry as how life itself first origi- nated. These are problems for the distant future if they are ever to be solved by man. As man possesses the same senses as the lower animals, his fundamental intuitions must be the same. Man has also some few instincts in common, as that of self-preserva- MENTAL POWERS. 75 tiou, sexual love, the love of the mother for her new-born offspring, the desire possessed by the latter to suck, and so forth. But man, perhaps, has somewhat fewer instincts than those possessed by the animals which come next to him in the series. The orang in the. Eastern islands and the chimpanzee in Africa build platforms on which they sleep; and as both species follow the same habit, it might be argued that this was due to instinct, but we cannot feel sure that it is not the result of both animals having similar wants and possessing similar powers of reasoning. These apes, as we may assume, avoid the many poisonous fruits of the tropics, and man has no such knowledge; but as our domestic animals, when taken to foreign lands, and when first turned out in the spring, often eat poisonous herbs, which they afterward avoid, we cannot feel sure that the apes do not learn from their own experience or from that of their parents Avhat fruits to select. It is, however, certain, as we shall presently see, that apes have an instinctive dread of serpents, and probably of other dangerous animals. The fewness and the comparative simplicity of the in- stincts in the higher animals are remarkable in contrast with those of the lower animals. Cuvier maintained that instinct and intelligence stand in an inverse ratio to each other ; and some have thought that the intellectual faculties of the higher animals have been gradually de- veloped from their instincts. But Pouchet, in an interest- ing essay,* has shown that no such inverse ratio really exists. Those insects which possess the most wonderful instincts are certainly the most intelligent. In the ver- tebrate series, the least intelligent members, namely fishes land amphibians, do not possess complex instincts ; and 'among mammals the animal most remarkable for its instincts, namely the beaver, is highly intelligent, as will be admitted by every one who has read Mr. Morgan's excellent work.f Although the first dawnings of intelligence, according to Mr. Herbert Spencer, J have been developed through the multiplication and co-ordination of reflex actions, and although many of the simpler instincts graduate into reflex * " L'Instinct cliez les Insectes," "Revue des Deux Mondes," Feb. 1870, p. 690. f " The American Beaver and His Works," 1868. J" The Principles of Psychology," 3d edit., 1870, pp. 418-443. 76 THE DESCENT OF MAN. actions, and can hardly be distinguished from them, as in the case of young animals sucking, yet the more complex instincts seem to have originated independently of intelli- gence. I am, however, very far from wishing to deny that instinctive actions may lose 'their fixed and untaught char- acter and he replaced by others performed by the aid of the free will. On the other hand, some intelligent actions, after being performed during several generations, become converted into instincts and are inherited, as when birds on oceanic islands learn to avoid man. These actions may then be said to be degraded in character, for they are no longer performed through reason or from experience. But the greater number of the more complex instincts appear to have been gained in a wholly different manner, through the natural selection of variations of simpler instinctive actions. Such variations appear to arise from the same unknown causes acting on the cerebral organization, which induce slight variations or individul differences in other parts of the body ; and these variations, owing to our ignorance, are often said to arise spontaneously. We can, I think, come to no other conclusion with respect to the origin of the more complex instincts, when we reflect on the marvelous instincts of sterile worker-ants and bees, which leave no offspring to inherit the effects of experience and of modified habits. Although, as we learn from the above-mentioned insects and the beaver, a high degree of intelligence is certainly compatible with complex instincts, and although actions, at first learned voluntarily, can soon through habit be performed with the quickness and certainty of a reflex action, yet it is not improbable that there is a certain amount of interference between the development of free intelligence and of instinct, which latter implies some in- herited modification of the brain. Little is known about the functions of the brain, but we can perceive "that as the intellectual powers become highly developed the various parts of the brain must be connected by very intricate channels of the freest intercommunication; and as a conse- quence each separate part would perhaps tend to be less well fitted to answer to particular sensations or associations in a definite and inherited that is instinctive manner. There seems even to exist some relation between a low de- gree of intelligence and a strong tendency to the formation MENTAL POWERS. 77 of fixed, though not inherited habits; for as a sagacious physician remarked to me, persons who are slightly imbecile tend to act in everything by routine or habit; and they are rendered much happier if this is encouraged. I have thought this digression worth giving, because we may easily underrate the mental powers of the higher ani- mals, and especially of man, when we compare their actions founded on the memory of past events, on foresight, reason and imagination, with exactly similar actions instinctively performed by the lower animals; in this latter case the capacity of performing such actions has been gained, step by step, through the variability of the mental organs and natural selection, without any conscious intelligence on the part of the animal during each successive generation. No doubt, as Mr. Wallace has argued,* much of the intelligent work done by man is due to imitation and not to reason; but there is this great difference between his actions and many of those performed by the lower animals, namely, that man cannot, on his first trial, make, for instance, a stone hatchet or a canoe, through his power of imitation. He has to learn his work by practice; a beaver, on the other hand, can make its dam or canal, and a bird its nest, as well, or nearly as well, and a spider its wonderful web, quite as well,f the first time it tries as when old and experienced. To return to our immediate subject; the lower animals, like man, manifestly feel pleasure and pain, happiness and misery. Happiness is never better exhibited than by young animals, such as puppies, kittens, lambs, etc., when playing together, like our own children. Even insects play together, as has been described by that excellent observer, P, Huber,J who saw ants chasing and pretending to bite each other, like so many puppies. The fact that the lower animals are excited by the same emotions as ourselves is so well established that it will not be necessary to weary the reader by many details. Terror acts in the same manner on them as on us, causing the muscles to tremble, the heart to palpitate, the * "Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection," 1870, p. 212. f For the evidence on this head, see Mr J. Traherne Moggridge's most interesting work, "Harvesting Ants and Trap-door Spiders/' 1873, pp. 126, 128. \ " Recherches sur les Mosurs des Fourmis," 1810, p. 178. 78 THE DESCENT OF MAN. sphincters to be relaxed, and the hair to stand on end. Suspicion, the offspring of .fear, is eminently characteristic of most wild animals. It is, I think, impossible to read the account given by Sir E. Tennent, of the behavior of the female elephants, used as decoys, without admitting that they intentionally practice deceit, and well know what they are about. Courage and timidity are extremely variable qualities in the individuals of the same species, as is plainly seen in our dogs. Some dogs and horses are ill-tempered and easily turn sulky; others are good-tempered; and these qualities are certainly inherited. Every one knows how liable animals are to furious rage and how plainly they show it. Many, and probably true, anecdotes have been published on the long-delayed and artful revenge of various animals. The accurate Rengger and Brehm* state that the American and African monkeys which they kept tame certainly revenged themselves. Sir Andrew Smith, a zoolo- gist whose scrupulous accuracy was known to many persons, told me the following story of which he was himself an eye- witness: At the Cape of Good Hope an officer had often plagued a certain baboon, and the animal, seeing him ap- proaching one Sunday for parade, poured water into a hole and hastily made some thick mud, which he skillfully dashed over the officer as he passed by, to the amusement of many bystanders. For long afterward the baboon re- joiced and triumphed whenever he saw his victim. The love of a dog for his master is notorious ; as an old writer quaintly says; f "A dog is the only thing on this earth that luvs you more than he luvs himself. " In the agony of death a dog has been known to caress his master, and every one has heard of the dog suffering under vivisection, who licked the hand of the operator; this man, unless the operation was fully justified by an increase of our knowledge, or unless he had a heart of stone, must have felt remorse to the last hour of his life. As Whewell % has well asked ; " Who that reads the *A11 the following statements, given on the authority of these two naturalists, are taken from Rengger's " Naturgesch. der Saugethiere von Paraguay," 1830, B. 41-57, and from Brehm's " Thierleben," B. i, s. 10-87. f Quoted by Dr. Lauder Lindsay, in his " Physiology of Mind in the Lower Animals;" "Journal of Mental Science," April, 1871, p. 38. \ " Bridgewater Treatise," p. 263. MENTAL POWERS. 79 touching instances of maternal affection, related so often of the women of all nations and of the females of all ani- mals, can doubt that the principle of action is the same in the two cases?" We see maternal affection exhibited in the most trifling details; thus, Rengger observed an Ameri- can monkey (a Cebus) carefully driving away the flies which plagued her infant; and Duvaucel saw a Hylobates washing the faces of her young ones in a stream. So in- tense is the grief of female monkeys for the loss of their young that it invariably caused the" death of certain kinds kept under confinement by Brehm in N. Africa. Orphan monkeys were always adopted and carefully guarded by the other monkeys, both males and females. One female baboon had so capacious a heart that she not only adopted young monkeys of other species, but stole young dogs and cats, which she continually carried about. Her kindness, however, did not go so far as to share her food with her adopted offspring, at which Brehm was surprised, as his monkeys always divided everything quite fairly with their own young ones. An adopted kitten scratched this affec- tionate baboon, who certainly had a fine intellect, for she was much astonished at being scratched, and immediately exam- ined the kitten's feet, and without more ado bit off the claws.* In the Zoological Gardens I heard from the keeper that an old baboon (C. cliacma) had adopted a Rhesus monkey; but when a young drill and mandrill were placed in the cage she seemed to perceive that these monkeys, though distinct species, were her nearer relatives, for she at once rejected the Rhesus and adopted both of them. The young Rhesus, as I saw, was greatly discontented at being thus rejected, and it would, like a naughty child, annoy and attack the young drill and mandrill whenever it could do so with safety; this conduct exciting great indignation in the old baboon. Monkeys will also, according to Brehm, defend their master when attacked by any one, as well as dogs to whom they are attached, from the attacks of other dogs. But we here trench on the subjects of sympathy and fidel- ity, to which I shall recur. Some of Brehm's monkeys *A critic, without any grounds (" Quarterly Review," July, 1871, p. 72), disputes the possibility of this act as described by Brehm, for the sake of discrediting niy work. Therefore I tried, and found that I could readily seize with my own teeth the sharp little claws of a kitten nearly five weeks old. 80 THE DESCENT OF MAN. took muoh delight in teasing a certain old dog whom they disliked, as well as other animals, in various ingenious ways. Most of the more complex emotions are common to the higher animals and ourselves. Every one has seen how jealous a dog is of his master's affection if lavished on any other creature; and I have observed the same fact with monkeys. This shows that animals not only love, but have a desire to be loved. Animals manifestly feel emulation. They love approbation or praise; and a dog carrying a bas- ket for his master exhibits in a high degree self-complac- ency or pride. There can, I think, be no doubt that a dog feels shame, as distinct from fear, and something very like modesty when begging too often for food. A great dog Bcorns the snarling of a little dog, and this may be called magnanimity. Several observers have stated that monkeys certainly dislike being laughed at; and they sometimes in- vent imaginary offenses. In the Zoological Gardens I saw a baboon who always got into a furious rage when his keeper took out a letter or book and read it aloud to him; and his rage was so violent that, as I witnessed on one occasion, he bit his own leg till the blood flowed. Dogs show what may be fairly called a sense of humor as distinct from mere play; if a bit of stick or other such object be thrown to one, he will often carry it away for a short distance ; and then squatting down with it on the ground close before him, will wait until his master comes quite close to take it away. The dog will then seize it and ru&h away in triumph, re- peating the same maneuver, a\id evidently enjoying the practical joke. We will now turn to the more intellectual emotions and faculties, which are very important, as forming the basis for the development of the higher mental powers. Animals manifestly enjoy excitement, and suffer from ennui, as may be seen with dogs, and, according to Kengger, with mon- keys. All animals feel Wonder and many exhibit Curiosity. Tbe> sometimes suffer from this latter quality, as when the hunter plays antics and thus attracts them; I have wit- nessed this with deer, and so it is with the wary chamois, and with some kinds of wild-ducks. Brehni gives a curious account of the instinctive dread, which his monkeys exhib- ited, for snakes; but their curiosity was so great that they could not desist from occasionally satiating their horror in a most human fashion by lifting up the lid of the box MENTAL POWERS. 81 in which the snakes were kept. I was so much surprised at his account that I took a stuffed and coiled-up snake into the monkey-house at the Zoological Gardens, and the excitement thus caused was one of the most curious spec- tacles which I ever beheld. Three species of Cercopithecus were the most alarmed ; they dashed about their cages and uttered sharp signal cries of danger, which were understood by the other monkeys. A few young monkeys and one old Anubis baboon alone took no notice of the snake. I then placed the stuffed specimen on the ground in one of the larger compartments. After a time all the monkeys col- lected round it in a large circle, and, staring intently, pre- sented a most ludicrous appearance. They became ex- tremely nervous; so that when a wooden ball, with which they were familiar as a plaything, was accidentally moved in the straw, under which it was partly hidden, they all in- stantly started away. These monkeys behaved very dif- ferently when a dead fish, a mouse,* a living turtle, and other new objects were placed in their cages; for though at first frightened, they soon approached, handled and ex- amined them. I then placed a live snake in a paper bag, with the mouth loosely closed, in one of the larger com- partments. One of the monkeys immediately approached, cautiously opened the bag a little, peeped in, and instantly dashed away. Then I witnessed what Brehm has described, for monkey after monkey, with head raised high and turned on one side, could not resist taking a momentary peep into the upright bag, at the dreadful object lying quietly at the bottom. It would almost appear as if monkeys had some notion of zoological affinities, for those kept by Brehm ex- hibited a strange, though mistaken, instinctive dread of innocent lizards and frogs. An orang, also, has been known to be much alarmed at the first sight of a turtle, f The principle of Imitation is strong in man, and espe cially, as I have myself observed, with savages. In certain morbid states of the brain this tendency is exaggerated to an extraordinary degree; some hemiplegic patients and others, at the commencement of inflammatory softening of the brain, unconsciously imitate every word which is uttered, whether * I have given a short account of their behavior on this occasion in my "Expression of the Emotions," p. 43. fW. 0. L, Martin, " Nat. Hist of Mammalia." 1841, p. 405. 88 THE DESCENT OF MAN". in their own or in a foreign language, and every gesture 01 action which is performed near them. * Desor f has re- marked that no animal voluntarily imitates an action per- formed by man, until in the ascending scale we come to monkeys, which are well known to be ridiculous mockers Animals, however, sometimes imitate each other's actions ; thus two species of wolves, which had been reared by dogs, learned to bark, as does sometimes the jackal, J but whether this can be called voluntary imitation is another question, Birds imitate the songs of their parents, and sometimes of other birds; and parrots are notorious imitators of any sound which they often hear. D ureau do la Malle gives an account of a dog reared by a cat, who learned to imitate the well- known action of a cat licking her paws, and thus washing her ears and face; this was also witnessed by the celebrated naturalist Audouin. I have received several confirmatory accounts; in one of these, a dog had not been suckled by a cat, but had been brought up with one, together with kittens, and had thus acquired the above habit, which he ever afterward practiced during his life of thirteen years. Bureau de la Malleus dog likewise learned from the kittens to play with a ball by rolling it about with his fore paws and springing on it. A correspondent assures me that a cat in his house used to put her paws into jugs of milk having too narrow a mouth for her head. A kitten of this cat soon learned the same trick, and practiced it ever afterward whenever there was am opportunity. The parents of many animals, trusting to the principle of imitation in their young, and more especially to their instinctive or inherited tendencies, may be said to educate them. We see this when a cat brings a live mouse to her kittens; and Bureau de la Malle has given a curious ac- count (in the paper above quoted) of his observations on hawks which taught their young dexterity, as well as judg- ment of distances, by first dropping through the air dead mice and sparrows, which the young generally failed to *I>r. Bateman "On Aphasia," 1870, p. 110. f Quoted by Vogt, " Memoire sur les Microcephales," 1867, p. 168. * " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. I, p. 27. " Annales des Sc. Nat." (1st series), torn, xxii, p. 397. MENTAL POWERS. 83 catch, and then bringing them live birds and letting them loose. Hardly any faculty is more important for the intellectual progress of man than Attention. Animals clearly manifest this power, as when a cat watches by a hole and prepares to spring on its prey. Wild animals sometimes become so absorbed when thus engaged that they may be easily ap- proached. Mr. Bartlett has given me a curious proof how variable this faculty is in monkeys. A man who trains monkeys to act in plays used to purchase common kinds from the Zoological Society at the price of five pounds f 01 each; but he offered to give double the price if he might keep three or four of them for a few days in order to select one. When asked how he could possibly learn so soon whether a particular monkey would turn out a good actor, he answered that it all depended on their power of atten- tion. If when he was talking and explaining anything to a monkey its attention was easily distracted, as by a fly on the wall or other trifling object, the case was hopeless. If he tried by punishment to make an inattentive monkey act it turned sulky. On the other hand, a monkey which carefully attended to him could always be trained. It is almost superfluous to state that animals have excel- lent memories for persons and places. A baboon at the Cape of Good Hope, as I have been informed by Sir An- drew Smith, recognized him with joy after an absence of nine months. I had a dog who was savage and averse to all strangers, and I purposely tried his memory after an absense of five years and two days. I went near the stable where he lived and shouted to him in my old manner; he showed no joy, but instantly followed me out walking, and obeyed me exactly as if I had parted with him only half an hour before. A train of old associations, dormant during five years, had thus been instantaneously awakened in his mind. Even ants, as P. Huber* has clearly shown, recog- nized their fellow-ants belonging to the same community after a separation of four months. Animals can certainly by some means judge of the intervals of time between recurrent events. The Imagination is one of the highest prerogatives of man. By this faculty he unites former images and ideas, *"Les Mceurs des Fourmis," 1810, p. 150. 84 THE DESCENT OF MAN. independently of the will, and thus creates brilliant and novel results. A poet, as Jean Paul Eichter remarks,* ' ' who must reflect wlietlier he shall make a character say yes or no to the devil Avith him ; he is only a stupid corpse." Dreaming gives us the best notion of this power; as Jean Paul again says, " The dream is an involuntary art of poetry." The value of the products of our imagination depends of course on the number, accuracy, and clearness of our impressions, on our judgment and taste in selecting or rejecting the involuntary combinations, and to a certain extent on our power of voluntarily combining them. As dogs, cats, horses, and probably all the higher animals, even birds f have vivid dreams, and this is shown by their movements and the sounds uttered, we must admit that they possess some power of imagination. There must be something special which causes dogs to howl in the night, and especially during moonlight, in that remarkable and melancholy manner called baying. All dogs do not do so; and, according to Houzeau,;J; they do not then look at the moon, but at some fixed point near the horizon. Hotizeau thinks that their imaginations are disturbed by the vague outlines of the surrounding objects, and conjure up before them fantastic images ; if this be so, their feelings may almost be called superstitious. Of all the faculties of the human mind, it will, I pre- sume, be admitted that Reason stands at the summit. Only a few persons now dispute that animals possess some power of reasoning. Animals may constantly be seen to pause, deliberate, and resolve. It is a significant fact, that the more the habits of any particular animal are studied by a naturalist, the more he attributes to reason and the less to unlearned instincts. In future chapters we shall see that some animals extremely low in the scale apparently display * Quoted in Dr. Maudsley's " Physiology and Pathology of Mind," 1868, pp. 19, 220. f Dr. Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. i, 1862, p. 21. Houzeau says that his paroquets and canary birds dreamed: " Facultes Mentales," torn, ii, p. 136. J " Facultes Mentales des Animaux," 1872, torn, ii, p. 181. Mr. L. H. Morgan's work on "The American Beaver," 1866, offers a good illustration of this remark. I cannot help thinking, however, that he goes too far in underrating the power of instinct. MENTAL POWERS. 85 a certain amount of reason. Xo doubt it is often difficult to distinguish between the power of reason and that of in- stinct. For instance, Dr. Hayes,, in his work on "The Open Polar Sea/' repeatedly remarks that his dogs, instead of continuing to draw the sledges in a compact body, diverged and separated when they came to thin ice, so that their weight might be more evenly distributed. This was often the first warning which the travelers received that the ice was becoming thin and dangerous. Now, did the dogs act thus from the experience of each individual, or from the example of the older and wiser dogs, or from an inher- ited habit, that is, from instinct? This instinct may pos- sibly lia^'e arisen since the time, long ago, when dogs were first employed by the natives in drawing their sledges; or the Arctic wolves, the parent-stock of the Esquimau dog, may have acquired an instinct impelling them not to attack their prey in a close pack, when on thin ice. AYe can only judge by the circumstances under which actions are performed, whether they are due to instinct, or to reason, or to the mere association of ideas; this latter principle, however, is intimately connected with reason. A curious case has been given by Prof. Mobius,* of a pike, separated by a plate of glass from an adjoining aquarium stocked with fish, and who often dashed himself with such violence against the glass in trying to catch the other fishes, that he was sometimes completely stunned. The pike went on thus for three months, but at last learned caution, and ceased to do so. The plate of glass was then removed, but the pike would not attack these particular fishes, though he would devour others which were afterward introduced ; so strongly was the idea of a violent shock associated in his feeble mind with the attempt on his former neighbors. If a savage, who had never seen a large plate-glass window, were to dash himself even once against it, he would for a long time afterward associate a shock with a window-frame; but, very differently from the pike, he would probably reflect on the nature of the impediment, and be cautious under analogous circumstances. Now with monkeys, as we shall presently see, a painful or merely a disagreeable impression, from an action once performed, is sometimes sufficient to prevent the animal from repeating it. If we * "Die Bewegungen der Tliiere," etc=, 1873, p. 11. 86 THE DESCENT OF MAN. attribute this difference between the monkey and the pike solely to the association of ideas being so much stronger and more persistent in the one than the other, though the pike often received much the more severe injury, can we maintain in the case of man that a similar difference implies the possession of a fundamentally different mind? Houzeau relates* that, while crossing a wide and arid ; >lain in Texas, his two dogs suffered greatly from thirst, and that between thirty and forty times they rushed down the hollows to search for water. These hollows were not valleys, and there were no trees in them, or any other differ- ence in the vegetation, and, as they were absolutely dry, there could have been no smell of damp earth. The dogs oehaved as if they knew that a dip in the ground offered tnem the best chance of finding water, and Houzeau has oftened witnessed the same behavior in other animals. I have seen, as I dare say have others, that when a small object is thrown on the ground beyond the reach of one of the elephants in the Zoological Gardens, he blows through his trunk on the ground beyond the object, so that the cur- rent reflected on all sides may drive the object within his reach. Again, a well-known ethnologist, Mr. "Westropp, informs me that he observed in Vienna a bear deliberately making with his paw a current in some water, which was close to the bars of his cage, so as to draw a piece of float- ing bread within his reach. These actions of the elephant and bear can hardly be attributed to instinct or inherited habit, as they would be of little use to an animal in a state of nature. Now, what is the difference between such actions, when performed by an uncultivated man, and by one of the higher animals? The savage and the dog have often found water at a low level, and the coincidence under such circumstances has become associated in their minds. A cultivated man would perhaps make some general proposition on the sub- ject; but from all that we know of savages it is extremely doubtful whether they would do so, and a dog certainly would not. But a savage, as well as a dog, would search In the same way, though frequently disappointed, and in both it seems to be equally an act of reason, whether or not any general proposition on the subject is consciously placed *Facult6sMentales des Animaux," 1872, toin. ii. p. 265 MENTAL POWERS. 87 before the mind.* The same would apply to the elephant and the bear making currents in the air or water. The savage would certainly neither know nor care by what law the desired movements were effected; yet his act would be guided by a rude process of reasoning, as surely as would a philosopher in his longest chain of deductions. There would no doubt be this difference between him and one of the higher animals, that he would take notice of much slighter circumstances and conditions, and would observe any connection between them after much less experience, and this would be of paramount importance. I kept a daily record of the actions of one of my infants, and when he was about eleven months old, and before he could speak a single word, I was continually struck with the greater quickness with which all sorts of objects and sounds were associated together in his mind, compared with that of the most intelligent dogs I ever knew. But the higher ani- mals differ in exactly the same way in this power of associ- ation from those low in the scale, such as the pike, as well as in that of drawing inferences and of observation. The promptings of reason, after very short experience, are well shown by the following actions of American mon- keys, which stand low in their order. Rengger, a most careful observer, states that when he first gave eggs to his monkeys in Paraguay they smashed them and thus lost much of their contents; afterward they gently hit one end against some hard body, and picked off the bits of shell with their fingers. After cutting themselves only once with any sharp tool, they would not touch it again, or would handle it with the greatest caution. Lumps of sugar were often given them wrapped up in paper ; and Rengger sometimes put a live wasp in the paper, so that in hastily unfolding it they got stung; after this had once hap- pened they always first held the packet to their ears to de- tect any movement within, f * Prof, Huxley has analyzed with admirable clearness the mental steps by which a man, as well as a dog, arrives at a conclusion in a case analogous to that given in my text. See his article, "Mr. Dar- win's Critics," in the "Contemporary Review," Nov, 1871, p. 462, and in his " Critiques and Essays/' 1873, p. 279. fMr. Belt, in his most interesting work, "The Naturalist in Nic- aragua," 1874 (p. 119), likewise describes various actions of a tamed Cebus, which, I think, clearly show that this animal possessed somf dthics advocated in this chapter were ever generally accepted, j. cannot bos oeiieve that in the hour of their triumph would be sounded 'cho .snell ji ins virtue of mankind.*' It is to be hoped ihat the belief ui die perma- nence of virtue on this earth is not held by many persons on so weak a tenure. 114 THE DESCENT OF MAN. strong mutual affection the two former kinds, at least, show on their reunion. It % is curious to speculate on the feelings of a dog, who will' rest peacefully for hours in a room with his master or any of the family, without the least notice being taken of him; but if left for a short time by himself, barks or howls dismally. We will confine our at- tention to the higher social animals, and pass over insects, although some of these are social, and aid one another in many important ways. The most common mutual service in the higher animals is to warn one another of danger by means of the united senses of all. Every sportsman knows, as Dr. Jaeger remarks,* how difficult it is to approach animals in a herd or troop. Wild horses and cattle do not, I believe, make any danger-signal ; but the attitude of any one of them who first discovers an enemy, warns the others. Rabbits stamp loudly on the ground with their hind feet as a signal ; sheep and chamois do the same with their fore feet, uttering likewise a whistle. Many birds and some mammals, post sentinels, which in the case of seals are saidf fenerally to be the females. The leader of a troop of mon- eys acts as the sentinel, and utters cries expressive both of danger and of safety. Social animals perform many little services for each other; horses nibble, and cows lick each other, on any spot which itches; monkeys search each other for external parasites; and Brehm states that after a troop of the Cercopithecus griseo-viridis has rushed through a thorny brake, each monkey stretches itself on a branch, and another monkey sitting by, " conscientiously " examines its fur, and extracts every thorn or burr. Animals also render more important services to one another; thus wolves and some other beasts of prey hunt in packs, and aid one another in attacking their victims. Peli- cans fish in concert. The Hamadryas baboons turn over stones to find insects, etc. ; and when they come to a large one, as many as can stand round, turn it over together and *"Die Darwin'sche Theorle," s. 101. fMr. R. Brown in "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1868, p. 409. f Brehm, " Thierleben," B. i, 1864, s. 52, 79. For the case of the monkeys extracting thorns from each other, see s. 54. With respect to the Hamadryas turning over stones, the fact is given (s. 76) on the evidence of Alvarez, whose observations Brehm thinks quite trust- worthy. For the cases of the old male baboons attacking the dogs, see a 79; and with respect to the eagle B. 56. MORAL SENSE. 115 share the hooty. Social animals mutually defend each other. Bull bisons in North America, when there is danger, drive the cows and calves into the middle of the herd, while they defend the outside. I shall also in a future chapter give an account of two young wild bulls at Ohillingliam attacking an old one in concert, and of two stallions together trying to drive away a third stallion from a troop of mares. In Abyssinia, Brehm encountered a great troop of baboons who were crossing a valley ; some had already ascended che opposite mountain, and some were still in the valley; the latter were attacked by the dogs, but the old males im- mediately hurried down from the rocks, and with mouths widely opened, roared so fearfully that the dogs quickly drew back. They were again encouraged to the attack; but by this time all the baboons had reascended the heights, excepting a young one about six months old, who, loudly calling for aid, climbed on a block of rock and was sur- rounded. Now one of the largest males, a true hero, came down again from the mountain, slowly went to the young one, coaxed him, and triumphantly led him away the dogs being too much astonished to make an attack. I cannot resist giving another scene which was witnessed by this same naturalist ; an eagle seized a young Cercopithecus, which, by clinging to a branch, was not at once carried off; it cried loudly for assistance, upon which the other mem- bers of the troop, with much uproar, rushed to the rescue, surrounded the eagle, and pulled out so many feathers that he no longer thought of his prey, but only how to escape. This eagle, as Brehm remarks, assuredly would never again attack a single monkey of a troop.* It is certain that associated animals have a feeling of love for each other which is not felt by non-social adult animals. How far in most cases they actually sympathize in the pains and pleasures of others is more doubtful, especially with respect to pleasures. Mr. Buxton, however, who had excel- lent means of observation,! states that his macaws, which * Mr. Belt gives the case of a spider-monkey (Ateles) in Nicaragua, which was heard screaming for nearly two hours in the forest, and Tvas found with an eagle perched close by it. The bird apparently feared to attack as long as it remained face to face; and Mr. Belt be- lieves, from what he has seen of the habits of these monkeys, that they protect themselves from eagles by keeping two or three together. " The Naturalist in Nicaragua," 1874, p. 118. f" Annals of Mag. of Nat. Hist.." Nov., 1868, p. 382. 116 THE DESCENT OF MAN. lived free in Norfolk, took "an extravagant interest" in a pair with a nest; and whenever the female left it she was* surrounded by a troop " screaming horrible acclamations in her honor." It is often difficult to judge whether animals have any feeling for the sufferings of others of their kind. Who can say what cows feel when they surround and stare intently on a dying or dead companion; apparently, how- ever, as Houzeau remarks, they feel BO pity. That animals sometimes are far from feeling any sympathy is too certain; for they will expel a wounded animal from the herd, or gore or worry it to death. This is almost the blackest fact in natural history, unless, indeed, the explanation which has been suggested is true, that their instinct or reason leads them to expel an injured companion, lest beasts of frey, including man,, should be tempted to follow the troop, a this case their conduct is not much worse than that of the North American Indians, who leave their feeble com- rades to perish on the plains; or the Fijians, who, wlin their parents get old, or fall ill, bury them alive.* Many animals, however, certainly sympathize with each other's distress or danger. This is the case even with birds. Capt. Stansburyf found on a salt lake in Utah an old and completely blind pelican, which was very fat, and must have been well fed for a long time by his companions. Mr. Blyth, as he informs me, saw Indian crows feeding two or three of their companions which were blind; and I have heard of an analogous case with the domestic cock. We may, if we choose, call these actions instinctive; but such cases are much too rare for the development of any special instinct. J I have myself seen a dog, who never passed a cat who lay sick in a basket, and was a great friend of his, without giving her a few licks with his tongue, the surest sign of kind feeling in a dog. It must be called sympathy that leads a courageous dog to fly at any one who strikes his master, as he certainly will. Sir J. Lubbook, "Prehistoric Times/' 2d edit., p, 446. f As quoted by Mr. L. H. Morgan, " The American Beaver," 1868, p. 272. Capt. Stansbury also gives an interesting account of the manner in which a very young pelican, carried away by a strong rtream, was guided and encouraged in its attemps to reach the shore by half a dozen old birds. JAs Mr. Bain states, "effective aid to a sufferer springs from sympathy proper." " Mental and Moral Science," 1868, p, 245. MORAL SENSE. 117 I saw a person pretending to beat a lady, who had a very timid little dog on her lap, and the trial had never been made before; the little creature instantly jumped away, but after the pretended beating was over, it was really pathetic to see how perseveringly he tried to lick his mistress' face, and comfort her. Brehm * states that when a baboon in confinement was pursued to be punished, the others tried to protect him. It must have been sympathy in the cases above given which led the baboons and Cercopitheci to defend their young comrades from the dogs and the eagle. I will give only one other instance of sympathetic and heroic conduct, in the case of a little American monkey. Several years ago a keeper at the Zoological Gardens showed me some deep and scarcely healed wounds on the nape of his own neck, inflicted on him, while kneeling on the floor, by a fierce baboon. The little American monkey, who was a warm friend of this keeper, lived in the same large compartment, and was dreadfully afraid of the great baboon. Nevertheless, as soon as he saw his friend in peril, he rushed to the rescue, and by screams and bites so distracted the baboon that the man was able to escape, after, as the surgeon thought, running great risk of his life. Besides love and sympathy, animals exhibit other quali- ties connected with the social instincts, which in us would be called moral; and I agree with Agassiz f that dogs possess something very like a conscience. Dogs possess some power of self-command, and this does not appear to be wholly the result of fear. As Braubach J remarks, they Avill refrain from stealing food in the absence of their master. They have long been accepted as the very type of fidelity and obedience. But the elephant is like- wise very faithful to his driver or keeper, and probably con- siders him as the leader of the herd. Dr. Hooker informs me that an elephant, which he was riding in India, became so deeply bogged that he remained stuck fast until the next day, when he was extricated by men with ropes. Under such circumstances elephants will seize with their trunk? any object, dead or alive, to place under their knees, to * " Thierleben," B. i, s. 85. f " De 1'Espece et de la Classe," 1869, p. 97. j "Die Darwin'sche Art-Lehre," 1869, s. 54. 118 THE DESCENT OF MAN. prevent their sinking deeper *. the mud; and the driver was dreadfully afraid lest the animal should have seized Dr. Hooker and crushed him to death. But the driver himself, as Dr. Hooker was assiired, ran no risk. This for- bearance, under an emergency so dreadful for a heavy animal, is a wonderful proof of noble fidelity.* All animals living in a body, which defend themselves or attack their enemies in concert, must indeed be in some degree faithful to one another ; and those that follow a leader must be in some degree obedient. When the baboons in Abyssiuiaf plunder a garden, they silently follow their leader; and if an imprudent young animal makes a a noise, he receives a slap from the others to teach him silence and obedience. Mr. Galton, who has had excellent opportunities for observing the half-wild cattle in S. Africa, says,J that they cannot endure even a momentary separa- tion from the herd. They are essentially slavish, and accept the common determination, seeking no better lot than to be led by any one ox who has enough self-reliance to accept the position. The men who break in these ani- mals for harness, watch assiduously for those who, by graz- ing apart, show a self-reliant disposition, and these they train as fore oxen. Mr. Galton adds that such animals are rare and valuable; and if many were born they would soon be eliminated, as lions are always on the lookout for the individuals which wander from the herd. With respect to the impulse which leads certain animals to associate together, and to aid one another in many ways, we may infer that in most cases they are impelled by the same sense of satisfaction or pleasure which they experi- ence in performing other instinctive actions ; or by the same sense of dissatisfaction as when other instinctive actions are checked. We see this in innumerable instances and it is illustrated in a striking manner by the acquired instincts of our domesticated animals; thus a young shep- herd-dog delights in driving and running round a flock of sheep, but not in worrying them ; a young fox-hound delights in hunting a fox, while some other kinds of dogs, * See also Hooker's " Himalayan Journals," vol. ii, 1854, p. 333. fBrehm, "Thierleben," B. i, s. 76. JSee Ms extremely interesting paper on " Gregariousness in Cat- tle and in Man," "Macmillan's Mag.," Feb., 1871, p. 353. MORAL SENSE. 119 as I have witnessed, utterly disregard foxes. What a strong feeling of inward satisfaction must impel a bird so full of activity, to brood day after day over her eggs. Migratory birds are quite miserable if stopped from migra- ting; perhaps they enjoy starting on their long flight; but it is hard to believe that the poor pinioned goose, described by Audubon, which started on foot at the proper time for its journey of probably more than a thousand miles, could have felt any joy in doing so. Some instints are determined solely by painful feelings, as by fear, which leads to self- preservation, and is in some cases directed toward special enemies. No one, I presume, can analyze the sensations of pleasure or pain. In many instances, however, it is probable that instincts are persistently followed from the mere force of inheritance, without the stimulus of either pleasure or pain. A young pointer, when it first scents game, apparently cannot help pointing. A squirrel in a cage who pats the nuts which it cannot eat, as. if to bury them in the ground, can hardly be thought to act thus, either from pleasure or pain. Hence the common assumption that men must be impelled to every action by experiencing some pleasure or pain may be erroneous. Although a habit may be blindly and implicitly followed, independently of any pleasure or pain felt at the moment, yet if it be forcibly and abruptly checked, a vague sense of dissatisfaction is generally experienced. It has often been assumed that animals were in the first place rendered social, and that they feel, as a consequence uncomfortable when separated from each other, and com- fortable while together; but it is a more probable view that these sensations were first developed in order that those animals which would profit by living in society should be induced to live together, in the same manner as the sense of hunger and the pleasure of eating were, no doubt, first acquired in order to induce animals to eat. The feeling of pleasure from society is probably an extension of the parental or filial affections, since the social instinct seems to be developed by the young remaining for a long time with their parents; and this extension may be attributed in part to habit, but chiefly to natural selection. With those animals which were benefited by living in close association, the individuals which took the greatest pleasure in society would best escape various dangers, while those that cared 120 THE DESCENT OF MAN. least for their comrades, and lived solitary, would perish in greater numbers. With respect to the origin of the parental and filial affections, which' apparently lie at the base of the social instincts, we know not the steps by which they have been gained; but we may infer that it has been to a large extent through natural selection. So it has almost cer- tainly been with the unusual and opposite feeling of hatred between the nearest relations, as with the worker-bees which kill their brother drones, and with the queen bees which kill their daughter queens; the desire to destroy their nearest relations having been in this case of service to the community. Parental affection, or some feeling which replaces it, has been developed in certain animals extremely low in the scale, for example, in star-fishes and spiders. It is also occasionally present in a few members alone in a whole group of animals, as in the genus Forficula, or earwigs. The all-important emotion of sympathy is distinct from that of love. A mother may passionately love her sleep- ing and passive infant, but she can hardly at such times be said to feel sympathy for it. The love of a man for his dog is distinct from sympathy, and so is that of a dog for his master. Adam Smith formerly argued, as has Mr. Bain recently, that the basis of sympathy lies in our strong retentiveness of former states of pain or pleasure. Hence, "the sight of another person enduring hunger, cold, fatigue, revives in us some recollection of the states, which are painful even in idea." AVe are thus impelled to relieve the sufferings of another in order that our own painful feelings may be at the same time relieved. In like manner we are led to participate in the pleasures of others.* But I cannot see how this view explains the fact that sympathy is excited, in an immeasurably stronger degree, by a beloved, than by an indifferent person. * See the first and striking chapter 'in Adam Smith's " Theory of Moral Sentiments." Also Mr. Bain's " Mental and Moral Science," 1868, pp. 244 and 275-282. Mr. Bain states, that "sympathy is, in- directly, a source of pleasure to the sympathizer;" and he accounts for this through reciprocity. He remarks that " the person bene- fited, or others in his stead, may make up, by sympathy and good offices returned, for all the sacrifice." But if, as appears to be the case, sympathy is strictly an instinct, its exercise would give direct pleasure, in the same manner as the exercise, as before remarked, of almost every other instinct. MORAL SENSE, 121 The mere sight of suffering, independently of love, would suffice to call up in us vivid recollections and associations. The explanation may lie in the fact that, with all animals, sympathy is directed solely toward the members of the same community, and therefore toward known and more or less beloved members, but not to all the individuals of the same species. This fact is not more surprising than that the fears of many animals should be directed against special enemies. Species which are not social, such as lions and tigers, no doubt feel sympathy for the suffering of their own young, but not for that of any other animal. With man- kind selfishness, experience, and imitation, probably add, as Mr. Bain has shown, to the power of sympathy; for we are led by the hope of receiving good in return to perform acts of sympathetic kindness to others; and sympathy is much strengthened by habit. In however complex a manner this feeling may have originated, as it is one of high importance to all those animals which aid and defend one another, it will have been increased through natural selec- tion; for those communities, which included the greatest number of the most sympathetic members, would flourish best and rear the greatest number of offspring. It is, however, impossible to decide in many cases whether certain social instincts have been "acquired through natural selection, or are the indirect result of other instincts and faculties, such as sympathy, reason, experience, and a ten- dency to imitation; or again, whether they are simply -the result of long-continued habit. So remarkable an instinct as the placing sentinels to warn the community of danger can hardly have been the indirect result of any of these faculties; it must, therefore, have been directly acquired. On the other hand, the habit followed by the males of some social animals of defending the community, and of attack- ing their enemies or their prey in concert, may perhaps have originated from mutual sympathy; but courage, and in most cases strength, must have been previously acquired, probably through natural selection. Of the various instincts and habits, some are much stronger than others; that is, some either give more pleas- ure in their performance, and more distress in their pre- vention, than others; or, which is probably quite as impor- tant, they are, through inheritance, more persistently f ollowed, without exciting any special feeling of pleasure 122 THE DESCENT OF MAN. or pain. "We are ourselves conscious that some habits are much more difficult to cure or change than others. Hence a struggle may often be observed in animals between dif- ferent instincts, or between an instinct and some habitual disposition; as when a dog rushes after a hare, is rebuked, pauses, hesitates, pursues again, or returns ashamed to his master; or as between the love of a female dog for her young puppies and for her master for she may be seen to slink away to them as if half-ashamed of not accompanying her master. But the most curious instance known to me of one instinct getting the better of another, is the migratory instinct conquering the maternal instinct. The former is wonderfully strong; a confined bird will at the proper season beat her breast against the wires of her cage until it is bare and bloody. It causes young salmon to leap out of the fresh water, in which they could continue to exist, and thus unintentionally to commit suicide. Every one knows how strong the maternal instinct is, leading even timid birds to face great danger, though with hesitation, and in opposition to the instinct of self-preservation. Nevertheless, the migratory instinct is so powerful that late in the autumn swallows, house-martins, and swifts fre- quently desert their tender young, leaving them to perish miserably in their nests.* "We can perceive that an instinctive impulse, if it be in any way more beneficial to a species than some other or opposed instinct, would be rendered the more potent of the two through natural selection; for the individuals which had it most strongly developed would survive in larger num- bers. Whether this is the case with the migratory in com- parison with the maternal instinct, may be doubted. The * This fact, the Rev. L. Jenyns states (see his edition of " White's Nat. Hist, of Selborne," 1853, p. 204) was first recorded by the illus- trious Jenner, in " Phil. Transact.," 1824, and has since been confirmed by several observers, especially by Mr. Blackwall. This latter care- ful observer examined, late in the autumn, during two years, thirty- six nests; he found that twelve contained young dead birds, five con- tained eggs on the point of being hatched, and three, eggs not nearly hatched. Many birds, not yet old enough for a prolonged flight, are likewise deserted and left behind. See Blackwall, " Researches in Zoology," 1834, pp. 108, 118. For some additional evidence, although this is" not wanted, see Leroy, " Lettres Phil.," 1802, p. 217. For swifts, Gould's "Introduction to the Birds of Great Britain," 1823, p. 5. Similar cases have been observed in Canada by Mr. Adams; "Pop. Science Review," July, 1873, p. 283. MORAL SENSE. 123 great persistence or steady action of the former at certain seasons of the year during the whole day, may give it for a time paramount force. Man a Social Animal. Every one will admit that man is a social being. We see this in his dislike of solitude, and in his wish for society beyond that of his own family. Solitary confinement is one of the severest punishments which can be inflicted. Some authors suppose that man prime vally lived in single families; but at the present day, though single families, or only two or three together, roam the solitudes of some savage lands, they always, as far as I can discover, hold friendly relations with other families inhabiting the same district. Such families occasionally meet in council, and unite for their common defense. It is no argument against savage man being a social animal, that the tribes inhabiting adjacent districts are almost always at war with each other; for the social instincts never extend to all the individuals o the same species. Judging from the analogy of the majority of the Quadrumana, it is probable that the early ape-like progenitors of man were likewise social ; but this is not of much importance for us. Although man, as he now exists, has few special instincts, having lost any which his early progenitors may have possessed, this is no reason why he should not have retained from an extremely remote period some degree of instinctive love and sympathy for his fellows. We are indeed all con- scious that we do possess such sympathetic feelings;* but pur consciousness does not tell us whether they are instinct- ive, having originated long ago in the same manner as with the lower animals, or whether they have been acquired by each of us during our early years. As man is a social animal, it is almost certain that he would inherit a tendency to be faithful to his comrades and obedient to the leader of his tribe; for these qualities are common to most social animals. He would consequently possess some capacity for self-command. He would from an inherited *Hume remarks ('An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals," edit, of 1751, p. 132), "There seems a necessity for con- fessing that the happiness and misery of others are not spectacles altogether indifferent to us, but that the view of the former . . . communicates a secret joy; the appearance of the latter . . throws a melancholy damp over the imagination." 124 THE DESCENT OF MAN. tendency be willing to defend, in concert with others, his fellow-men; and would b6' ready to aid them in any way, which did not too greatly interfere with his own welfare or his own strong desires. The social animals which stand at the bottom of the scale are guided almost exclusively, and those which stand higher in the scale are largely guided, by special iastincts in the aid which they give to the members of the same commu- nity; but they are likewise in part impelled by mutual love and sympathy, assisted apparently by some amount of reason. Although man, as just remarked, has no special instincts to tell him how to aid his fellow-men, he still has the impulse, and with his improved intellectual faculties would naturally be much guided in this respect by reason and experience. Instinctive sympathy would also cause him to value highly the approbation of his fellows; for, as Mr. Bain has clearly shown,* the love of praise and the strong feeling of glory, and the still stronger horror of scorn and infamy, " are due to the workings of sympathy." Consequently man would be influenced in the highest degree by the wishes, approbation, and blame of his fellow- men, as expressed by their gestures and language. Thus the social instincts, which must have been acquired by man in a very rude state, and probably even by his early ape-like progenitors, still give the impulse to some of his best actions; but his actions are in a higher degree determined by the expressed wishes and judgment of his fellow-men, : and unfortunately very often by his own strong selfish desires. But as love, sympathy and self-command become strengthened by habit, and as the power of reasoning becomes clearer, so that man can value justly the judgments of his fellows, he will feel himself impelled, apart from any transitory pleasure or pain, to certain lines of conduct. He might then declare not that any barbarian or unculti- vated man could thus think I am the supreme judge of my own conduct, and in the words of Kant, I will not in my own person violate the dignity of humanity. Tlie More Enduring Social Instincts Conquer the Less Per- sistent Instincts. We have not, however, as yet considered the main point, on which, from our present point of view. " Mental and Moral Science," 1868, p. 254. MORAL SENSE. 125 the whole question of the moral sense turns. Why should a man feel that he ought to obey one instinctive desire rather than another? Why is he bitterly regretful, if he has yielded to a strong sense of self-preservation, and has not risked his life to save that of a fellow-creature? or why does he regret having stolen food from hunger? It is evident, in the first place, that with mankind the instinctive impulses have different degrees of strength; a savage will risk his own life to save that of a member of the same community, but will be wholly indifferent about a stranger ; a young and timid mother urged by the maternal instinct will, without a moment's hesitation, run the greatest danger for her own infant, but not for a mere fellow-creature. Nevertheless many a civilized man, or even boy, who never before risked his life for another, but full of courage and sympathy, has disregarded the instinct of self-preservation, and plunged at once into a torrent to save a drowning man, though a stranger. In this case man is impelled by the same instinctive motive which made the heroic little American monkey, formerly described, save his keeper, by attacking the great and dreaded baboon. Such actions as the above appear to be the simple result of the greater strength of the social or maternal instincts than that of any other instinct or motive; for they are performed too instantaneously for reflection, or for pleasure or pain to be felt at the time; though, if prevented by any cause, distress or even misery might be felt. In a timid man, on the other hand, the instinct of self-preservation might be so strong, that he would be unable to force himself to run any such risk, perhaps not even for his own child. I am aware that some persons maintain that actions per- formed impulsively, as in the above cases, do not come under the dominion of the moral sense, and cannot be called moral. They confine this term to actions done deliberately, after a victory over opposing desires, or when prompted by some exalted motive. But it appears scarcely possible to draw any clear line of distinction of this kind c * * I refer here to the distinction between what has been called mutt rial and formal morality. I am glad to find that Prof. Huxley ("Critiques and Addresses," 1873, p. 287) takes the same view on this subject as I do. Mr. Leslie Stephen remarks (" Essays on Free- thinking and Plain Speaking," 1873, p. 83), "the metaphysical dis- tinction, between material and formal morality is as irrevelant as other such distinctions." 126 THE DESCENT OF MAN. As far as exalted motives are concerned, many instances have been recorded of savages, destitute of any feeling of general benevolence toward mankind, and not guided by any religious motive, who have deliberately sacrificed their lives as prisoners,* rather than betray their comrades; and surely their conduct ought to be considered as moral. As far as deliberation, and the victory over opposing motives are concerned, animals may be seen doubting between opposed instincts, in rescuing their offspring or comrades from danger; yet their actions, though done for the good of others, are not called moral. Moreover, anything per- formed very often by us, will at last be done without deliberation or hesitation, and can then hardly be distin- guished from an instinct; yet surely no one will pretend that such an action ceases to be moral. On the contrary, we all feel that an act cannot be considered as perfect, or as performed in the most noble manner, unless, it be done impulsively, without deliberation or effort, in the same manner as by a man in whom the requisite qualities are innate. He who is forced to overcome his fear or want of sympathy before he acts, deserves, however, in one way higher credit than the man whose innate disposition leads him to a good act without effort. As we cannot distinguish between motives, we rank all actions of a certain class as moral, if performed by a moral being. A moral being is one who is capable of comparing his past and future actions or motives, and of approving or disapproving of them. We have no reason to suppose that any of the lower animals have this capacity; therefore, when a Newfoundland dog drags a child out of the water, or a monkey faces danger to rescue its comrade, or takes charge of an orphan monkey, we do not call its conduct moral. But in the case of man, who alone can with certainty be ranked as a moral being, actions of a certain class are called moral, whether per- formed deliberately, after a struggle with opposing motives, or impulsively through instinct, or from the effects of slowly gained habit. But to return to our more immediate subject. Although some instincts are more powerful than others, and thus lead to corresponding actions, yet it is untenable, that in man * I have given one such case, namely, of three Patagonian Indiana who preferred being shot, one after the other, to betraying the plans of their companions in war (" Journal of Researches," 1845, p. 103). MORAL SENSE. 127 the social instincts (including the love of praise and fear of blame) possess greater strength, or have, through long habit, acquired greater strength than the instincts of self- preservation, hunger, lust, vengeance, etc. Why then does man regret, even though trying to banish such regret, that he has followed the one natural impulse rather than the other; and why does he further feel that he ought to regret his conduct? Man in this respect differs profoundly from the lower animals. Nevertheless we can, I think, see with some degree of clearness the reason of this difference. Man, from the activity of his mental faculties, cannot avoid reflection; past impressions and images are incessantly and clearly passing through his mind. Now with those animals which live permanently in a body, the social instincts are ever present and persistent. Such animals are always ready to utter the danger-signal, to defend the com- munity, and to give aid to their fellows in accordance with their habits; they feel at all times, without the stimulus of any special passion or desire, some degree of love and sym- pathy for them; they are unhappy if long separated from them, and always happy to be again in their company. So it is with ourselves. Even when we are quite alone, how often do we think with pleasure or pain of what others think of us of their imagined approbation or disapproba- tion; and this all follows from sympathy, a fundamental element of the social instinctSo A man who possessed no trace of such instincts would be an unnatural monster. On the other hand, the desire to satisfy hunger, or any passion such as vengeance, is in its nature temporary, and can for a time be fully satisfied. Nor is it easy, perhaps hardly pos- sible, to call up with complete vividness the feeling, for instance, of hunger; nor indeed, as has often been remarked, of any suffering. The instinct of self-preservation is not felt except in the presence of danger, and many a coward has thought himself brave until he has met his enemy face to face. The wish for another man^s property is perhaps as persistent a desire as any that can be named: but even in this case the satisfaction of actual possession is generally a weaker feeling than the desire; many a thief, if not an habitual one, after success has wondered why he stole some article. * * Enmity or hatred seems also to be a highly persistent, feeling, perhaps more so than aoy ether that can be named. Envy is defined 128 THE DESCENT OF MAN. A man cannot prevent past impressions often repassing through his mind; he wiU thus be driven to make a com- parison between the impressions of past hunger, vengeance satisfied, or danger shunned at other men's cost, with the almost ever-present instinct of sympathy, and with his early knowledge of what others consider as praiseworthy or blameable. This knowledge cannot be banished from his mind, and from instinctive sympathy is esteemed of great moment. He will then feel as if he had been balked in following a present instinct or habit, and this with all animals causes dissatisfaction, or even misery. The above case of the swallow affords an illustration, though of a reversed nature, of a temporary though for the time strongly persistent instinct conquering another in- stinct, which is usually dominant over all others. At the proper season these birds seem all day long to be impressed with the desire to migrate ; their habits change ; they become restless, are noisy and congregate in flocks. While the mother-bird is feeding, or brooding over her nestlings, the maternal instinct is probably stronger than the migra- tory; but the instinct which is the more persistent gains the victory, and at last, at a moment when her young ones are not in sight, she takes flight and deserts them. When arrived at the end of her long journey, and the migratory instinct has ceased to act, what an agony of remorse the bird would feel if, from being endowed with great mental as hatred of another for some excellence or success; and Bacon in- sists (Essay ix), "Of all other affections envy is the most importune and continual." Dogs are very apt to hate both strange men and strange dogs, especially if they live near at hand, but do not belong to the same family, tribe, or clan; this feeling would thus seem to be innate, and is certainly a most persistent one. It seems to be the complement and converse of the true social instinct. From what we hear of savages, it would appear that something of the same kind holds good with them. If this be so, it would be a small step in any one to transfer such feelings to any member of the same tribe if he had done him an injury and had become his enemy. Nor is it probable that the primitive conscience would reproach a man for in- juring his enemy; rather it would reproach him, if lie had not revenged himself. To do good in return for evil, to love your enemy, is a height of morality to which it may be doubted whether the soc'al instincts would, by themselves, have ever led us. It is necessary that these instincts, together with sympathy, should have been highly cultivated and extended by the aid ot reason, instruc- tion, and the love or fear of cial instincts, that is with the good of others; but in order to be quite free from self-reproach, or at least of anxiety, it is almost necessary for him to avoid the disap- probation, whether reasonable or not, of his fellow-men. Nor must he break through the fixed habits of his life, especially if these are supported by reason; for if he does, he will assuredly feel dissatisfaction. He must likewise avoid the reprobation of the one God or gods in whom, according to his knowledge or superstition, he may believe; but in this case the additional fear of divine punishment often supervenes. The Strictly Social Virtues at First Alone Regarded. The above view of the origin and nature of the moral sense, which tells us what we ought to do, and of the conscience which reproves us if we disobey it, accords well with what we see of the early and undeveloped condition of this faculty in mankind. The virtues which must be practiced, at least generally, by rude men, so that they may associate in a body, are those which aie still recognized as the most important. But they are practiced almost exclusively in relation to the men of the same tribe; and their opposites are not regarded as crimes in relation to the men of other tribes. No tribe could hold together if murder, robbery, treachery, etc., were common, consequently such crimes within the limits of the same tribe " are branded with everlasting infamy;"* but excite no such sentiment beyond these limits. A North American Indian is well pleased with himself, and is hon- ored by others, when he scalps a man of another tribe; and a Dyak cuts off the head of an unoffending person, and dries it as a trophy. The murder of infants has prevailed on the largest scale throughout the world, f and has met with no reproach; but infanticide, especially of females, has been thought to be good for the tribe, or at least not injurious. Suicide during former times was not generally *See an able article in the " North British Review," 1867, p. 395 See also Mr. W. Bagehot's articles on the " Importance of Obedience" end "Coherence to Primitive Man," in the " Fortnightly Review," 1867, p. 529, and 1868, p. 457, etc. \ The fullest account which I have met with is by Dr. Gerland, in hi* " Uebor d, Mr. Winwood Reade informs me that the Negroes on the Gold Coast, though admir- ing white men and mulattoes, have a maxim that mulattoes should not intermarry, as the children are few and sickly. This belief, as Mr. Reade remarks, deserves attention, as white men have visited and resided on the Gold Coast for four hundred years, so that the natives havfs had ample time to gain knowledge through experience. f" Military and Anthropolog. Statistics of American Soldiers," by B. A. Gould, 1869, p. 319. 196 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the degrees of difference between the parents in external structure or habits of life. Man in many respects may be compared with those animals which have long been domes- ticated, and a large body of evidence can be advanced in favor of the Pallasian doctrine,* that domestication tends to eliminate the sterility which is so general a result of the crossing of species in a state of nature. From these sev- eral considerations, it may be justly urged that the perfect fertility of the intercrossed races of man, if established, would not absolutely preclude us from ranking them as distinct species. Independently of fertility, the characters presented by the offspring from a cross have been thought to indicate whether or not the parent-forms ought to be ranked as * " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, p. 109. I may here remind the reader that the sterility of species when crossed is not a specially acquired quality, but, like the inca- pacity of certain trees to be grafted together, is incidental on other acquired differences. The nature of these differences is unknown, but they relate more especially to the reproductive system, and much less so to external structure or to ordinary differences in constitution. One important element in the sterility of crossed species apparently lies in one or both having been long habituated to fixed conditions; for we know that changed conditions have a special influence on the reproductive system, and \ve have good reason to believe (as before remarked) that the fluctuating conditions of domestication tend to eliminate that sterility which is so general with species, in a natural state, when crossed. It has elsewhere been shown by me (ibid., vol. ii, p. 185, and " Origin of Species," 5th edit., p. 317),' that the steril- ity of crossed species has not been acquired through natural selection; we can see that when two forms have already been rendered very sterile, it is scarcely possible that their sterility should be aug- mented by the preservation or survival of the more and more sterile individuals; for, as the sterility increases, fewer and fewer offspring will be produced from which to breed, and at last only single indi- viduals will be produced at the rarest intervals. But there is even a higher grade of sterility than this. Both Gartner and K61 renter have proved that in genera of plants, including many species, a series can be formed from species which, when crossed, yield fewer and fewer seeds, to species which never produce a single seed, but yet are affected by the pollen of the other species, as shown by the swelling of the germen. It is here manifestly impossible to select the more sterile individuals, which have already ceased to yield seeds; so that the acme of sterility, when the germen alone is affected, cannot have been gained through selection. This acme, and no doubt the other grades of sterility, are the incidental results of certain unknown differences in the constitution of the reproductive system of the species which are crossed. THE RACES OF MAN. 197 species or varieties; but after carefully studying the evi- dence, I have come to the conclusion that no general rules of this kind can be trusted. The ordinary result of a cross is the production of a blended or intermediate form; but in certain cases some of the offspring take closely after one parent-form and some after the other. This is especially apt to occur when the parents differ in characters which first appeared as sudden variations or monstrosities.* 1. refer to this point because Dr. Rohlfs informs me that he has frequently seen in Africa the offspring of negroes crossed with members of other races, either completely black or completely white, or rarely piebald. On the other hand, it is notorious that in America mulattoes commonly present an intermediate appearance. Vfe have now seen that a naturalist might feel himself fully justified in ranking the races of man as distinct spe- cies; for he has found that they are distinguished by many differences in structure and constitution, some being of importance. These differences have also remained nearly constant for very long periods of time. Our naturalist will have been in some degree influenced by the enormous range of man, which is a great anomaly in the class of mammals, if mankind be viewed as a single species. He will have been struck with the distribution of the several so-called races, which accords with that of other undoubtedly dis- tinct species of mammals. Finally, he might urge that the mutual fertility of all the races has not as yet been fully proved, and even if proved would not be an absolute proof of their specific identity. On the other side of the question, if our supposed nat- uralist were to inquire whether the forms of man keep dis- tinct like ordinary species when mingled together in large numbers in the same country, he would immediately dis- cover that this was by no means the case. In Brazil he would behold an immense mongrel population of Negroes and Portuguese; in Chili and other parts of South Amer- ica he would behold the whole population consisting of In- dians and Spaniards blended in various degrees, f In many * " The Variation of Animals," etc., vol. ii, p. 92. | M. de Quatrefages has given (" Anthropolog. Review," Jan., 1869, p. 22) an interesting account of the success and energy of the Paulistas in Brazil, who are a much crossed race of Portuguese and Indians, with a mixture of. the Wood of other races. 198 THE DESCENT OF MAN. parts of the same continent he would meet with the most complex crosses between Negroes, Indians, and Europeans; and judging from the vegetable kingdom such triple crosses afford the severest test of the mutual fertility of the parent forms. In one island of the Pacific he would find a small population of mingled Polynesian and English blood; and in the Fiji Archipelago a population of Polynesian and Negritos crossed in all degrees. Many analogous cases could be added; for instance, in Africa. Hence the races of man are not sufficiently distinct to inhabit the same country without fusion; and the absence of fusion affords the usual and best test of specific distinctness. Our naturalist would likewise be much disturbed as soon as he perceived that the distinctive characters of all the races were highly variable. This fact strikes every one on first beholding the negro slaves in Brazil, who have been imported from all parts of Africa. The same remark holds good with the Polynesians, and with many other races. It may be doubted whether any character can be named which is distinctive of a race and is constant. Savages, even within the limits of the same tribe, are not nearly so uniform in character as has been often asserted. Hotten- tot women offer certain peculiarities, more strongly marked than those occurring in any other race, but these are known not to be of constant occurrence. In the several American tribes, color and hairiness differ considerably; as does color to a certain degree, and the shape of the features greatly, in the negroes of Africa. The shape of the skull varies much in some races;* and so it is with every other character. Now all naturalists have learned by dearly bought experience how rash it is to attempt to define species by the aid of inconstant characters. But the most weighty of all the arguments against treat- ing the races of man as distinct species, is that they gradu- ate into each other, independently in many cases, as far as we can judge, of their having intercrossed. Man has been studied more carefully than any other animal, and yet there is the greatest possible diversity among capable judges whether he should be classed as a single species or race, or * For instance, with the aborigines of America and Australia. Prof. Huxley says (" Transact. Internal. Congress of Prehist. Arch.," 1868, p. 105) that the skulls of many South Germans and Swiss are " as short and as broad as those of the Tartars," etc. THE RACES OF MAN. 199 as two (Virey^, as three (Jacquinot), as four (Kant), five (Blumeiibach), six (Buff on), seven (Hunter), eight (Agas- siz), eleven (Pickering), fifteen (Bory St. Vincent), sixteen (Desmoulins), twenty-two (Morton), sixty (Crawfurd), or as sixty-three, according to Burke.* This diversity of judgment does not prove that the races ought not to be ranked as species, but it shows that they graduate into each other, and that it is hardly possible to discover clear i distinctive characters between them. Every naturalist who has had the misfortune to under- take the description of a group of highly varying organ- isms has encountered cases (I speak after experience) precisely like that of man; and if of a cautious disposition, he will end by uniting all the forms which graduate into each other under a single species; for he will say to him- self that he has no right to give names to objects which he cannot define. Cases of this kind occur in the order which includes man, namely in certain genera of monkeys; while in other genera, as in Cercopithecus, most of the species can be determined with certainty. In the American genus Cebus, the various forms are ranked by some naturalists as species, by others as mere geographical races. Now if numerous specimens of Cebus were collected from all parts of South America, and those forms which at present appear to be specifically distinct were found to graduate into each other by close steps, they would usually be ranked as mere varieties or races; and this course has been followed by most naturalists with respect to the races of man. Never- theless, it must be confessed that there are forms, at least in the vegetable kingdom,! which we cannot avoid naming as species, but which are connected together by numberless gradations, independently of intercrossing. Some naturalists have lately employed the term f ' sub- species " to designate forms which possess many of the char- acteristics of true species, but which hardly deserve so high *See a good discussion on this subject in Waitz, " Introduct. to Anthropology," Eng. translat., 1863, pp. 198-208, 227. I have taken some of the above statements from H. Tuttle's " Origin and Antiquity of Physical Man," Boston, 1866, p. 35. f Prof. Nageli has carefully described several striking cases in his " Botanische Mittheilungen, " B. ii, 1866, ss. 294-369. Prof. Asa Gray has made analogous remarks on some intermediate forms in the Composites of Nor 200 THE DESCENT OF MAN. a rank. Now if we reflect on the weighty arguments above given, for raising the races of man to the dignity of species, and the insuperable difficulties on the other side in denning them, it seems that the term " sub-species " might here be used with propriety. But from long habit the term " race " will perhaps always be employed. The choice of terms is only so far important in that it is desirable to use, as far as possible, the same terms for the same degrees of difference. Unfortunately this can rarely be done; for the larger genera generally include closely-allied forms, which can be distin- guished only with much difficulty, while the smaller genera within the same family include forms that are perfectly dis- tinct; yet all must be ranked equally as species. So again, species within the same large genus by no means resemble each other to the same degree; on the contrary, some of them can generally be arranged in little groups round other species, like satellites round planets.* The question whether mankind consists of one or sev- eral species has of late years been much discussed by anthro- pologists, who are divided into the two schools of monogen- ists and polygenists. Those who do not admit the prin- ciple of evolution must look at species as separate creations, or as in some manner as distinct entities; and they must decide what forms of man they will consider as species by the analogy of the method commonly pursued in ranking other organic beings as species. But it is a hopeless endeavor to decide this point, until some definition of the term "species "is generally accepted; and the definition must not include an indeterminate element such as an act of creation. We might as well attempt without any definition to decide whether a certain number of houses should be called a village, town or city. We have a practical illus- tration of the difficulty in the never-ending doubts whether many closely-allied mammals, birds, insects and plants, which represent each other respectively in North America and Europe, should be ranked as species or geographical races; and the like holds true of the productions of many islands situated at some little distance from the nearest continent. Those naturalists, on the other hand, who admit the principle of evolution, and this is now admitted by the *" Origin of Species," 5th edit. p. 68. THE RACES OF MAN. 201 majority of rising men, will feel no doubt that all the races of man are descended from a single primitive stock ; whether or not they may think fit to designate the races as distinct species, for the sake of expressing their amount of difference.* With our domestic animals the question whether the various races have arisen from one or more species is somewhat different. Although it may be admit- ted that all the races, as well as all the natural species within the same genus, have sprung from the same primi- tive stock, yet it is a fit subject for discussion, whether all the domestic races of the dog, for instance, have acquired their present amount of difference since some one species was first domesticated by man; or whether they owe some of their characters to inheritance from distinct species, which had already been differentiated in a state of nature. With man no such question can arise, for he cannot be said to have been domesticated at any particular period. During an early stage in the divergence of the races of man from a common stock, the differences between the races and their number must have been small; consequently as far as their distinguishing characters are concerned, they then had less claim to rank as distinct species than the existing so-called races. Nevertheless, so arbitrary is the term of species, that such early races would perhaps have been ranked by some naturalists as distinct species, if their differences, although extremely slight, had been more con- stant than they are at present, and had not graduated into each other. It is, however, possible, though far from probable, that the early progenitors of man might formerly have diverged much in character, until they became more unlike each other than any now existing races; but that subsequently, as suggested by Vogt, f they converged in character. When man selects the offspring of two distinct species for the same object, he sometimes induces a considerable amount of convergence, as far as general appearance is concerned. This is the case, as shown by Von Nathusius,t with the *See Prof. Huxley to this effect in the " Fortnightly Review," 1865, p. 275. f " Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., 1864, p. 468. t"Die,Racen des Schweines," 1860, s. 46. " Vorstudien fur Geschichte, etc. Scliweineschadel," 1864, s. 104. With respect to cattle, see M. de Qiiatrefages, "Unite de 1'Espece Humaine," 1861, p. 119. 202 THE DESCENT OF MAN. improved breeds of the pig, which are descended from two distinct species; and in a less marked manner with the improved breeds of cattle. A great anatomist, Gratiolet, maintains that the anthropomorphous apes do not form a natural sub-group ; but that the orang is a highly devel- oped gibbon or semnopithecus, the chimpanzee a highly developed macacus, and the goriHa a highly developed man- drill. If this conclusion, which rests almost exclusively on brain-characters, be admitted, we should have a case of con- vergence at least in external characters, for the anthropomor- phous apes are certainly more like each other in many points than they are to other apes. All analogical resemblances, as of a whale to a fish, may indeed be said to be cases of con- vergence; but this term has never been applied to super- ficial and adaptive resemblances. It would, however, be extremely rash to attribute to convergence close similarity of character in many points of structure among the modi- fied descendants of widely distinct beings. The form of a crystal is determined solely by the molecular forces, and it is not surprising that dissimilar substances should some- times assume the same form; but with organic beings we should bear in mind that the form of each depends on an infinity of complex relations, namely, on variations due to causes far too intricate to be followed on the nature of the variations preserved, these depending on the physical conditions, and still more on the surrounding organisms which compete with each and lastly, on inheritance (in itself a fluctuating element) from innumerable progenitors, all of which have have had their forms determined through equally complex relations. It appears incredible that the modified descendants of two organisms, if these differed from each other in a marked manner, should ever after- ward converge so closely as to lead to a near approach to identity throughout their whole organization. In the case of the convergent races of pigs above referred to, evidence of their descent from two primitive stocks is, according to Von Nathusius, still plainly retained in certain bones of their skulls. If the races of man had descended, as is sup- posed by some naturalists, from two or more species which differed from each other as much, or nearly as much, as does the orang from the gorilla it can hardly be doubted that marked differences in the structure of certain bones would still be discoverable in man as he now exists. THE RACES OF MAN. 203 Although the existing races of man differ in many re- spects as in color, hair, shape of skull, proportions of the body, etc., yet if their whole structure be taken into con- sideration they are found to resemble each other closely in a multitude of points. Many of these are of so unimpor- tant or of so singular a nature that it is extremely improb- able that they should have been independently acquired by aboriginally distinct species or races. The same remark holds good with equal or greater force with respect to the numerous points of mental similarity between the most distinct races of man. The American aborigines, Negroes and Europeans are as different from each other in mind as any three races that can be named; yet I was incessantly struck while living with the Fuegians on board the " Beagle" with the many little traits of character showing how similar their minds were to ours; and so it was with a full-blooded negro with whom I happened once to be intimate. He who will read Mr. Tylor's and Sir J. Lubbock's in- teresting works* can hardly fail to be deeply impressed with the close similarity between the men of all races in tastes, dispositions and habits. This is shown by the pleas- ure which they all take in dancing, rude music, painting, tattooing and otherwise decorating themselves; in their mutual comprehension of gesture-language, by the same expression in their features, and by the same inarticulate cries, when excited by the same emotions. This similarity, or rather identity, is striking, when contrasted with the different expressions and cries made by distinct species of monkeys. There is good evidence that the art of shooting with bows and arrows has not been handed down from any common progenitor of mankind, yet as Westropp and Nilsson have remarked, \ the stone arrow-heads, brought from the most distant parts of the world, and manufactured at the most remote periods, are almost identical; and this fact can only be accounted for by the various races having similar inventive or mental powers. The same observation * Tylor's " Early History of Mankind," 1865; with respect to ges- ture-language, see p. 54. Lubbock's ' Prehistoric Times," 2d edit., J"0n Analogous Forms of Implements," in "Memoirs of Anthro- og. Soc.," by H. M. Westropp. "The Primitive Inhabitants of candinavia," Eng. translate edited by Sir J. Lubbock, 1868, p. 104. 204 THE DESCENT OF MAN. has been made by archaeologists * with respect to certain widely-prevalent ornaments, such as zig-zags, etc.; and with respect to various simple beliefs and customs, such as the burying of the dead under megalithic structures. I remember observing in South America f that there, as in so many other parts of the world, men have generally chosen the summits of lofty hills to throw up piles of stones, either as a record of some remarkable event, or for burying their dead. Now when naturalists observe a close agreement in numerous small details of habits, tastes, and dispositions between two or more domestic races, or between nearly allied natural forms, they use this fact as an argument that they are descended from a common progenitor who was thus endowed; and consequently that all should be classed under the same species. The same argument may be applied with much force to the races of man. As it is improbable that the numerous and unimportant points of resemblance between the several races of man in bodily structure and mental faculties (I do not here refer to similar customs) should all have been independently acquired, they must have been inherited from progenitors who had these same characters. We thus gain some insight into the early state of man, before he had spread step by step over the face of the earth. The spreading of man to regions widely separated by the sea, no doubt, preceded any great amount of divergence of character in the several races; for otherwise we should sometimes meet with the same race in distinct continents; and this is never the case. Sir J. Lubbock, after comparing the arts now practiced by savages in all parts of the world, specifies those which man could not have known, when he first wandered from his original birthplace; for if once learned they would never have been forgotten. J He thus shows that "the spear, which is but a development of the knife-point, and the club, which is but a long hammer, are the only things left." He admits, however, that the art of making fire probably had been already discovered, for it is common to all the *Westropp, "On Cromlechs," etc., "Journal of Ethnological Soc.," as given in " Scientific Opinion," June 2, 1869, p. 3. f "Journal of Researches; Voyage of the ' Beagle,' " p. 46. j " Prehistoric Times," 1869, p. 574. THE RAGES OF MAN. 205 races now existing, and was known to the ancient cave- inhabitants of Europe. Perhaps the art of making rude canoes or rafts was likewise known; but as man existed at a remote epoch, when the land in many places stood at a very different level to what it does now, he would have been able, without the aid of canoes, to have spread widely. Sir J. Lubbock further remarks how improbable it is that out earliest ancestors could have " counted as high as ten, con- sidering that so many races now in existence cannot get beyond four." Nevertheless, at this early period, the intel- lectual and social faculties of man could hardly have been inferior in any extreme degree to those possessed at present by the lowest savages; otherwise primeval man could not have been so eminently successful in the struggle for life, as proved by his early and wide diffusion. From the fundamental differences between certain lan- guages, some philologists have inferred that when man first became widely diffused, he was not a speaking animal; but it may be suspected that languages, far less perfect than any now spoken, aided by gestures, might have been used, and yet have left no traces on subsequent and more highly- de\ eloped tongues. Without the use of some language, however imperfect, it appears doubtful whether man's intel- lect could have risen to the standard implied by his domi- nant position at an early period. Whether primeval man, when he possessed but few arts, and those of the rudest kind, and when his power of lan- guage was extremely imperfect, would have deserved to be called man, must depend on the definition which we employ. In a series of forms graduating insensibly from some ape-like creature to man as he now exists, it would be impossible to fix on any definite point when the term " man " ought to be used. But this is a matter of very little importance. So again, it is almost a matter of indif- ference whether the so-called races of man are thus desig- nated, or are ranked as species or sub-species; but the latter term appears the more appropriate. Finally, we may con- clude that when the principle of evolution is generally accepted, as it surely will be before long, the dispute between the monogenists and the polygenists will die a silent and unobserved death. One other question ought not to be passed over without 206 THE DESCENT OF MAN. notice, namely, whether, as is sometimes assumed, each sub-species or race of man has sprung from a single pair of progenitors. With our domestic animals a new race can readily be formed by carefully matching the varying off- spring from a single pair, or even from a single individual possessing some new character; but most of our races have been formed, not intentionally from a selected pair, but unconsciously by the preservation of many individuals which have varied, however slightly, in some useful or desired manner. If in one country stronger and heavier horses, and in another country lighter and fleeter ones, were habitually preferred, we may feel sure that two distinct sub-breeds would be produced in the course of time, with- out any one pair having been separated and bred from, in either country. Many races have been thus formed, and their manner of formation is closely analogous to that of natural species. We know, also, that the horses taken to the Falkland Islands have, during successive generations, become smaller and weaker, while those which have run wild on the Pampas have acquired larger and coarser heads; and such changes are manifestly due, not to any one pair, but to all the individuals having been subjected to the same conditions, aided, perhaps, by the principle of rever- sion. The new sub-breeds in such cases are not descended from any single pair, but from many individuals which have varied in different degrees, but in the same general manner; and we may conclude that the races of man have been similarly produced, the modifications being either the direct result of exposure to different conditions, or the indirect result of some form of selection. But to this latter subject we shall presently return. On the Extinction of the Races of Man. The partial or complete extinction of many races and sub-races of man is historically known. Humboldt saw in South America a parrot which was the sole living creature that could speak a word of the language of a lost tribe. Ancient monuments and stone implements found in all parts of the world, about which no tradition has been preserved by the present inhabitants, indicate much extinction. Some small and broken tribes, remnants of former races, still survive in isolated and generally mountainous districts. In Europe THE RACES OF MAN. 207 the ancient races were all, according to Schaaffhausen,* "lower in the scale than the rudest living savages ;" they must therefore have differed, to a certain extent, from any existing race. The remains described by Prof. Broca from Les Eyzies, though they unfortunately appear to have belonged to a single family, indicate a race with a most singular combination of low or simious, and of high char- acteristics. This race is " entirely different from any other, ancient or modern, that we have heard of."f It differed, therefore, from the quaternary race of the caverns of Belgium. Man can long resist conditions which appear extremely unfavorable for his existence. J He has long lived in the extreme regions of the north, with no wood for his canoes or implements, and with only blubber as fuel and melted snow as drink. In the southern extremity of America the Fuegians survive without the protection of clothes, or of any building worthy to be called a hovel. In South Africa the aborigines wander over arid plains, where dangerous beasts abound. Man can withstand the deadly influence of the Terai at the foot of the Himalaya and the pestilen- tial shores of tropical Africa. Extinction follows chiefly from the competition of tribe with tribe and race with race. Various checks are always in action, serving to keep down the numbers of each savage tribe such as periodical famines, nomadic habits and the consequent deaths of infants, prolonged suckling, wars, accidents, sickess, licentiousness, the stealing of women, infanticide, and especially lessened fertility. If any one of these checks increases in power, even slightly, the tribe thus affected tends to decrease ; and when of two adjoining tribes one becomes less numerous and less power- ful than the other, the contest is soon settled by war, slaughter, cannibalism, slavery, and absorption. Even when a weaker tribe is not thus abruptly swept away, if it once begins to decrease, it generally goes on decreasing until it becomes extinct. * Translation in "Anthropological Review," Oct., 1868, p. 431. {"Transact. Tnternat. Congress of Prehistoric Arch.," 1868, pp. 172-175. See also Broca (translation) in " Anthropological Review," Oct., 1868, p. 410. Dr. Gerland, " Ueberdas Aussterben der Naturvolker," 1868, s,8g. gGerland (ibid, s. 13) gives facts in support of this statement. 208 THE DESCENT OF MAN. When civilized nations come into contact with barba- rians the struggle is short, except where a deadly climate gives its aid to the native race. Of the causes which lead to the victory of civilized nations some are plain and sim- ple, others complex and obscure. We can see that the cultivation of the land will be fatal in many ways to sav- ages, for they cannot, or will not, change their habits. New diseases and vices have in some cases proved highly destructive; and it appears that a new disease often causes much death until those who are most susceptible to its destructive influence are gradually weeded out;* and so it may be with the evil effects from spirituous liquors, as well as with the unconquerably strong taste for them shown by so many savages. It further appears, mysterious as is the fact, that the first meeting of distinct and separated people generates disease, f Mr. Sproat, who in Vancouver Island closely attended to the subject of extinction, believed that changed habits of life, consequent on the advent of Euro- peans, induces much ill -health. He lays, also, great stress on the apparently trifling cause that the natives become " bewildered and dull by the new life around them; they lose the motives for exertion and get no new ones in their place. "I The grade of their civilization seems to be a most impor- tant element in the success of competing nations. A few centuries ago Europe feared the inroads of Eastern barba- rians; now any such fear would be ridiculous. It is a more curious fact, as Mr. Bagehot has remarked, that savages did not formerly waste away before the classical nations as they now do before modern civilized nations; had they done so the old moralists would have mused over the event; but there is no lament in any writer of that period over the perishing barbarians. The most potent of all the causes of extinction appears in many cases to be lessened fertility *See remarks to this effect in Sir H. Holland's "Medical Notes and Reflections," 1839, p. 390. fl have collected ("Journal of Researches, Voyage of the Beagle,'" p. 435) a good many cases bearing on this subject; see also Gerland, ibid, s. 8. Poeppig speaks of the " breath of civiliza- tion as poisonous to savages. " J Sproat, " Scenes and Studies of Savage Life," 1868, p. 284, g Bagehot., "Physics and Politics," "Fortnightly Review," Aprf J, 1868, p. 455. THE RACES OF MAN. 209 and ill-health, especially among the children, arising from changed conditions of life, notwithstanding that the new conditions may not be injurious in themselves. I am much indebted to Mr. H. H. Howorth for having called my attention to this subject and for having given me informa- tion respecting it. I have collected the following cases: When Tasmania was first colonized the natives were roughly estimated by some at 7,000, and by others at 20,000. Their number was soon greatly reduced,, chiefly by fighting with the English and with each other. After the famous hunt by all the colonists, when the remaining natives deliv- ered themselves up to the government, they consisted only of 1'20 individuals,* who were in 1832 transported to Flinders Island. This island, situated between Tasmania and Aus- tralia, is forty miles long, and from twelve to eighteen miles broad; it seems healthy, and the natives were well treated. Nevertheless, they suffered greatly in health. In 1834 they consisted (Bonwick, p. 250) of forty-seven adult males, forty-eight adult females, and sixteen children, or in all of one hundred and eleven souls. In 1835 only one hundred were left. As they continued rapidly to decrease, and as they themselves thought that they should "not perish so quickly elsewhere, they were removed in 1847 to Oyster Cove in the southern part of Tasmania. They then con- sisted (Dec. 20, 1847) of fourteen men, twenty-two women and ten children, f But the change of site did no good. Disease and death still pursued them, and in 1864 one man (who died in 1869) and three elderly women alone survived. The infertility of the women is even a more remarkable fact than the* liability of all to ill-health and death. At the time when only nine women were left at Oyster Cove they told Mr. Bouwick (p. 386) that only two had ever borne children; and these two had together produced only three children! With respect to the cause of this extraordinary state of things Dr. Story remarks that death followed the attempts to civilize the natives. " If left to themselves to roam as they were wont and undisturbed they would have reared more children and there would have been less mortality." * All the statements here given are taken from "The Last of the Tasmanians," by J. Bonwick, 1870. f This is the statement of the Governor of Tasmania, Sir W. Deni son, " Varieties of Vice-Regal Life," 1870, vol. i, p. 67. 210 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Another careful observer of the natives, Mr. Davis, remarks, " The births have been few and the deaths numerous. This may have been in a great measure owing to their change of living and food; but more so to their banishment from the mainland of Van Diemen's Land and consequent depression of spirits " (Bonwick, pp. 388, 390). Similar facts have been observed in two widely different parts of Australia. The celebrated explorer, Mr. Gregory, told Mr. Bonwick, that in Queensland "the want of repro- duction was being already felt with the blacks, even in the most recently settled parts, and that decay would set in." Of thirteen aborigines from Shark's Bay who visited Murchison River, twelve died of consumption within three months.* The decrease of the Maories of New Zealand has been carefully investigated by Mr. Fenton, in an admirable report, from which all the following statements, with one exception, are taken, f The decrease in number since 1830 is admitted by every one, including the natives themselves, and is still steadily progressing. Although it has hitherto been found impossible to take an actual census of the natives, their " numbers were carefully estimated by resi- dents in many districts. The result seems trustworthy, and shows that during the fourteen years, previous to 1858, the decrease was 19.42 per cent. Some of the tribes, thus carefully examined, lived above a hundred miles apart, some on the coast, some inland; and their means of sub- sistence and habits differed to a certain extent (p. 28). The total number in 1858 was believed to be 53,700, and in 1872, after a second interval of fourteen years, another census was taken, and the number is given as only 36,359, showing a decrease of 32.29 per cent. ! J Mr. Fenton, after showing in detail the insufficiency of the various causes usually assigned in explanation of this extraordinary decrease, such as new diseases, the profligacy of the women, drunkenness, wars, etc., concludes on weighty grounds that it depends chiefly on the unproduc- *For these cases see Bonwick 's "Daily Life of the Tasmanians," 1870, p. 90; and the " Last of the Tasmanians," 1870, p. 386. f ' ' Observations on the Aboriginal Inhabitants of New Zealand " published by the Government, 1859. t " New Zealand," by Alex. Kennedy, 1873, p. 47. THE RACES OF MAN. 211 tiveness of the women and on the extraordinary mortality of the young children (pp. 31, 34). In proof of this he shows (p. 33) that in 1844 there was one non-adult for every 2.57 adults; whereas in 1858 there was only one non- adult for every 3.27 adults. The mortality of the adults is also great. He adduces as a further cause of the decrease the inequality of the sexes; for fewer females are born than males. To this latter point, depending perhaps on a widely distinct cause, I shall return in a future chapter. Mr. Fenton contrasts with astonishment the decrease in New Zealand with the increase in Ireland; countries not very dissimilar in climate, and where the inhabitants now follow nearly similar habits. The Maories themselves (p. 35) " attribute their decadence, in some measure, to the intro- duction of new food and clothing, and the attendant change of habits;" and it will be seen, when we consider the influence of changed conditions on fertility, that they are probably right. The diminution began between the years 1830 and 1840; and Mr. Fenton shows (p. 40) that about 1830, the art of manufacturing putrid corn (maize), by long steeping in water, was discovered and largely prac- ticed; and this proves that a change of habits was begin- ning among the natives, even when New Zealand was only thinly inhabited by Europeans. When I visited the Bay of Islands in 1835, the dress and food of the inhabitants had already been much modified ; they raised potatoes, maize and other agricultural produce, and exchanged them for English manufactured goods and tobacco. It is evident from many statements in the life of Bishop Patteson,* that the Melanesians of the New Hebrides and neighboring archipelagoes, suffered to an extraordinary degree in health, and perished in large numbers, when they were removed to New Zealand, Norfolk Island and other salubrious places, in order to be educated as missionaries. The decrease of the native population of the Sandwich Islands is as notorious as that of New Zealand. It has been roughly estimated by those best capable of judging, that when Cook discovered the Islands in 1779, the popula- tion amounted to about 300,000. According to a loose census in 1823, the numbers then were 142,050. In 1832, *"Life 'of J. C. Patteson," by C. M. Younge, 1874; see more especially vol. i, p. 530. 212 THE DESCENT OF MAN. and at several subsequent periods, an accurate census was officially taken, but I have been able to obtain only the fol- lowing returns: Annual rate of decrease per YBAB. NATIVE POPULATION. (Except during 1832 and 1836, when the few foreigners in the islands were included.) cent., assuming it to have been uniform between the successive censuses ; these censuses being taken at ir- regular intervals. 1832 130,313 4.46 1836 108,579 2.47 1853 71,019 0.81 1860 67,084 2.18 1866 58,765 2.17 1872 51,531 We here see that in the interval of forty years, between 1832 and 1872, the population has decreased no less than sixty-eight per cent. ! This has been attributed by most writers to the profligacy of the women, to former bloody wars, and to the severe labor imposed on conquered tribes and to newly introduced diseases, which have been on sev- eral occasions extremely destructive. No doubt these and other such causes have been highly efficient, and may account for the extraordinary rate of decrease between the years 1832 and 1836; but the most potent of all the causes seems to be lessened fertility. According to Dr. Kuschen- berger of the United States Navy, who visited these islands between 1835 and 1837, in one district of Hawaii, only twenty-five men out of 1,134, and in another district only ten out of 637, had a family with as many as three children. Of eighty married women, only thirty-nine had ever borne children ; and " the official report gives an average of half a child to each married couple in the whole island/' This is almost exactly the same average as with the Tasmanians at Oyster Cove. Jarves, who pub- lished his history in 1843, says that "families who have three children are freed from all taxes; those having more, THE RACES OF MAN. 213 are rewarded by gifts of land arid other encouragements." This unparalleled enactment by the government well shows how infertile the race had become. The Eev. A. Bishop stated in the Hawaiian ''Spectator " in 1839, that a large proportion of the children die at early ages, and Bishop Staley informs me that this is still the case, just as in New Zealand. This has been attributed to the neglect of the children by the women, but it is probably in large part due to innate weakness of constitution in the children, in rela- tion to the lessened fertility of their parents. There is, moreover, a further resemblance to the case of New Zeal- and, in the fact that there is a large excess of male over female births; the census of 1872 gives 31,650 males to 25,247 females of all ages, that is 125.36 males for every 100 females; whereas in all civilized countries the females exceed the males. No doubt the profligacy of the women may in part account for their small fertility; but their changed habits of life is a much more probable cause, and which will at the same time account for the increased mor- tality, especially of the children. The islands were visited by Cook in 1779, by Vancouver in 1794, and often subse- quently by whalers. In 1819 missionaries arrived, and found that idolatry had been already abolished, and other changes effected by the king. After this period there was a rapid change in almost all the habits of life of the natives, and they soon became " the most civilized of the Pacific Islanders." One of my informants, Mr. Coan, who was born on the islands, remarks that the natives have under- gone a greater change in their habits of life in the course of fifty years than Englishmen during a thousand years. From information received from Bishop Staley, it does not appear that the poorer classes have ever much changed their diet, although many new kinds of fruit have been introduced, and the sugar-cane is in universal use. Owing however, to their passion for imitating Europeans, they altered their manner of dressing at an early period, and the use of alcoholic drinks became very general. Although these changes appear inconsiderable, I can well believe, from what is known with respect to animals, that they might suffice to lessen the fertility of the natives.* * The foregoing statements are taken chiefly from the following works: " Jarves' History of the Hawaiian Islands," 1843, pp. 400- 407, Cbeever, "Life in the Sandwich Islands," 1851, p. 277. 214 TUB DESCENT OF MAN. Lastly, Mr. Macnamara states * that the low and de graded inhabitants of the Andaman Islands, on the eastern side of the Gulf of Bengal, are " eminently susceptible to any change of climate; in fact, take them away from their island homes, and they are almost certain to die, and that independently of diet or extraneous influences." He further states that the inhabitants of the Valley of Nepal, which is extremely hot in summer, and also the various hill-tribes of India, suffer from dysentery and fever when on the plains; and they die if they attempt to pass the whole year there. We thus see that many of the wilder races of man are apt to suffer much in health when subjected to changed conditions or habits of life and not exclusively from being transported to a new climate. Mere alterations in habits, which do not appear injurious in themselves, seem to have this same effect; and in several cases the children are particularly liable to suffer. It has often been said, as Mr. Macnamara remarks, that man can resist with impunity the greatest diversities of climate and other changes; but this is true only of the civilized races. Man in his wild condition seems to be in this respect almost as susceptible as his near- est allies, the anthropoid apes, which have never yet sur- vived long, when removed from their native country. Lessened fertility from changed conditions, as in the case of the Tasmanians, Maories, Sandwich Islanders, and apparently the Australians, is still more interesting than their liability to ill-health and death; for even a slight degree of infertility, combined with those other causes which tend to check the increase of every population, would sooner o/ later lead to extinction. The diminution of fertility may be explained in some cases by the profligacy of the women (as until lately with the Tahitians), but Mr. Fenton has shown that this explanation by no means suffices with the New Zealanders, nor does it with the Tasmanians. Ruschenberger is quoted by Bonwick, "Last of the Tasmanians," 1870, p. 378. Bishop is quoted by Sir E. Belcher, " Voyage Round the World," 1843, vol. i, p. 272. I owe the census of the several years to the kindness of Mr. Coan, at the request of Dr. Youmans, of New York; and in most cases I have compared the Youmans figures with those given in several of the above-named works. I have omitted the census for 1850, as I have seen two widely different num- bers given. * "The Indian Medical Gazette," Nov. 1, 1871, p. 240. THE RACES OF MAN. 215 In the paper above quoted, Mr. Macnamara gives reasons for believing that the inhabitants of districts subject to malaria are apt to be sterile; but this cannot apply in sev- eral of the above cases. Some writers have suggested that the aborigines of islands have suffered in fertility and health from long continued inter-breeding; but in the above cases infertility has coincided too closely with the arrival of Europeans for us to admit this explanation. Nor have we at present any reason to believe that man is highly sen- sitive to the evil effects of inter-breeding, especially in areas so large as New Zealand and the Sandwich Archi- pelago with its diversified stations. On the contrary, it is Known that the present inhabitants of Norfolk Island are nearly all cousins or near relations, as are the Todas in India, and the inhabitants of some of the Western Islands of Scotland; and yet they seem not to have suffered in fertility.* A much more probable view is suggested by the analogy of the lower animals. The reproductive system can be shown to be susceptible to an extraordinary degree (though why we know not) to changed conditions of life; and this susceptibility leads both to beneficial and to evil results. A large collection of facts on this subject is given in chap- ter xviii, of volume ii, of my " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication." I can here give only the briefest abstract; and every one interested in the subject may consult the above work. Very slight changes increase the health, vigor and fertility of most or all organic beings, while other changes are known to render a large number of animals sterile. One of the most familiar cases is that of tamed elephants not breeding in India; though they often breed in Ava, where the females are allowed to roam about the forests to some extent, and are thus placed under more natural conditions. The case of various American mon- keys, both sexes of which have been kept for many years together in their own countries, and yet have very rarely or never bred, is a more apposite instance, because of their relationship to man. It is remarkable how slight a change * On the close relationship of the Norfolk Islanders, see Sir W. Denison, "Varieties of Vice-Regal Life," vol. i, 1870, p. 410. For the, Todas, -see Col. Marshall's work, 1873, p. 110. For the Western Islands of Scotland, Dr. Mitchell, "Edinburgh Medical Journal," March to June, 1865. 216 THE DESCENT OF MAN. in the conditions often induces sterility in a wild animal when captured; and this is the more strange as all our domesticated animals have become more fertile than they were in a state of nature; and some of them can resist the most unnatural conditions with undiminished fertility.* Certain groups of animals are much more liable than others to be affected by captivity; and generally all the species of the same group are affected in the same manner. But sometimes a single species in a group is rendered sterile., while the others are not so; on the other hand, a single species may retain its fertility while most of the others fail to breed. The males and females of some species when confined, or when allowed to live almost but not quite free, in their native country never unite; others thus circum- stanced frequently unite but never produce offspring; others again produce some offspring, but fewer than in a state of nature; and as bearing on the above cases of man it is important to remark that the young are apt to be weak and sickly, or malformed, and to perish at an early age. Seeing how general is this law of the susceptibility of the reproductive system to changed conditions of life, and that it holds good with our nearest allies, the Quadrimiana, I can hardly doubt that it applies to man in his primeval state. Hence, if savages of any race are induced suddenly to change their habits of life they become more or less sterile, and their young offspring suffer in health in the same manner and from the same cause as do the elephant and hunting- leopard in India, many monkeys in America, and a host of animals of all kinds on removal from their natural conditions. We can see why it is that aborigines, who have long inhabited islands, and who must have been long exposed to nearly uniform conditions, should be specially affected by any change in their habits, as seems to be the case. Civil- ized races can certainly resist changes of all kinds far better than savages ; and in this respect they resemble domesticated animals, for though the latter sometimes suffer in health (for instance European dogs in India), yet they are rarely rendered sterile, though a few such *For the evidence on this head, see " Variation of Animals," etc., vol. ii, p. 111. THE RACES OF MAN. 217 instances have been recorded.* The immunity of civilizeu. races and domesticated animals is probably dne to their having been subjected to a greater . extent, and, therefore, having grown somewhat more accustomed, to diversified or varying conditions, than the majority of wild animals; and to their having formerly immigrated or been carried from country to country, and to different families or sub-races having inter-crossed. It appears that a cross with civilized races at once gives to an aboriginal race an immunity from the evil consequences of changed conditions. Thus the crossed offspring from the Tahitians and English, when settled in Pitcairn Island, increased so rapidly that the island was soon overstocked; and in June, 185G, they were removed to Norfolk Island. They then consisted of 60 married persons and 13-4 children, making a total of 194. Here they likewise increased so rapidly that, although 16 of them returned to Pitcairn Island in 1859, they numbered in January, 1868, 300 souls; the males and females being in exactly equal numbers. What a contrast does this case present with that of the Tasmanians; the Norfolk Islanders increased in only twelve and a half years from 194 to 300; whereas the Tasmanians decreased during 15 years from 120 to 46, of which latter number only 10 were children, f So again in the interval between the census of 1866 and 1872 the natives of full blood in the Sandwich Islands decreased by 8,081, while the half-castes, who are believed to be healthier, increased by 847; but I do not know whether the latter number includes the offspring from the half-castes, or only the half-castes of the first genera- tion. The cases which I have here given all relate to aborigines who have been subjected to new conditions as the result of the immigration of civilized men. But sterility and ill- health would probably follow if savages were compelled by any cause, such as the inroad of a conquering tribe, to desert their homes and to change their habits. It is an * " Variation of Animals," etc., vol. ii, p. 16. f These details are taken from " The Mutineers of the ' Bounty," " by Lady Belcher, 1870; and from "Pitcairn Island," ordered to be printed by- the House of Commons, May 29, 1863. The following statements about the Sandwich Islanders are from the ' ' Honolulu Gazette," and from Mr. Coan, 218 THE DESCENT OF MAN. interesting circumstance that the chief check to wild ani- mals becoming domesticated, which implies the power of their breeding freely when first captured, and one chief check to wild men, when brought into contact with civil- ization, surviving to form a civilized race, is the same, namely, sterility from changed conditions of life. Finally, although the gradual decrease and ultimate extinction of the races of man is a highly complex problem, depending on many causes which differ in different places and at different times ; it is the same problem as that presented by the extinction of one of the higher animals of the fossil horse, for instance, which disappeared from South America, soon afterward to be replaced, within the same districts, by countless troups of the Spanish horse. The New Zealander seems conscious of this parallelism, for he compares his future fate with that of the native rat now almost exterminated by the Euro- pean rat. Though the difficulty is great to our imagi- nation, and really great, if we wish to ascertain the precise causes and their manner of action, it ought not to be so to our reason, as long as we keep steadily in mind that the increase of each species and each race is constantly checked in various ways; so that if any new check, even a slight one, be superadded, the race will surely decrease in number; and decreasing numbers will sooner or later lead to extinc- tion; the end, in most cases, being promptly determined by the inroads of conquering tribes. On the Formation of the Races of Man. In some cases the crossing of distinct races has led to the formation of a new race. The singular fact that the Europeans and Hin- doos, who belong to the same Aryan stock and speak a, language fundamentally the same, differ widely in appear- ance, while Europeans differ but little from Jews, who belong to the Semitic stock and speak quite another lan- guage, has been accounted for by Broca,* through certain Aryan branches having been largely crossed by indigenous tribes during their wide diffusion. When two races in close contact cross the first result is a heterogeneous mix- ture; thus Mr. Hunter, in describing the Santali or hill- *" On Anthropology," translation " Anthropolog. Review," Jan., 1868, p. 88. THE RAVES OF MAN. 219 tribes of India, says that hundreds of imperceptible grada- tions may be traced " from the black, squat tribes of the mountains to the tall olive-colored Brahman, with his intel- lectual brow, calm eyes, and high but narrow head;" so that it is necessary in courts of justice to ask the wit- nesses whether they are Santalis or Hindoos.* Whether a heterogeneous people, such as the inhabitants of some of the Polynesian islands, formed by the crossing of two distinct races, with few or no pure members left, would/ ever become homogeneous, is not known from direct evi-i dence. But as with our domesticated animals, a cross- breed can certainly be fixed and made uniform by careful selectionf in the course of a few generations, we may infer that the free intercrossing of a heterogeneous mixture during a long descent would supply the place of selection and overcome any tendency to reversion ; so that the crossed race would ultimately become homogeneous, though it might not partake in an equal degree of the characters of the two parent-races. Of all the differences between the races of man, the color of the skin is the most conspicuous and one of the best marked. It was formerly thought that differences of this kind could be accounted for by long exposure to different climates ; but Pallas first showed that this is not tenable and he has since been followed by almost all anthropologists. \ This view has been rejected chiefly because the distribution of the variously colored races, most of whom must have long inhabited their present homes, does not coincide with corresponding dif- ferences of climate. Some little weight may be given to such cases as that of the Dutch families, who, as we hear on excellent authority,! have not undergone the least change of color after residing for three centuries in S. Africa. An argument on the same side may likewise be drawn * " The Annals of Rural Bengal," 1868, p. 134. f "The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, p. 95. \ Pallas, "Act. Acad. St. Petersburg," 1780, part ii, p. 69. He was followed by Rudolphi, in his " Beytrage zur Anthropologie," 1812. An excellent summary of the evidence is given by Godron, " De 1'Espece," 1859, vol. ii, p. 246, etc. Sir Andrew Smith, as quoted by Knox, " Races of Man," I860, p. 473, 220 THE DESCENT OF MAN. from the uniform appearance in various parts of the world of gypsies and Jews, though the uniformity of the latter has been somewhat exaggerated.* A very damp or a very dry atmosphere has been supposed to be more influential in modifying the color of the skin than mere heat; but as D'Orbigny in South America, and Livingstone in Africa, arrived at diametrically opposite conclusions with respect to dampness and dryness, any conclusion on this head must be considered as very doubtful, f Various facts, which I have given elsewhere, prove that the color of the skin and hair is sometimes correlated in a surprising manner with a complete immunity from the action of certain vegetable poisons, and from the attacks of certain parasites. Hence it occurred to me, that negroes and other dark races might have acquired their dark tints by the darker individuals escaping from the deadly influence of the miasma of their native countries, during a long series of generations. I afterward found that this same idea had long ago occurred to Dr. Wells. J It has long been known that negroes, and even mulattoes are almost completely exempt from the yellow fever, so destructive in tropical America. They likewise escape to a large extent the fatal intermit- tent" fevers that prevail along at least 2,600 miles of the shores of Africa, and which annually cause one-fifth of the white settlers to die and another fifth to return home invalided. || This immunity in the negro seems to be partly inherent, depending on some unknown peculiarity of con- stitution and partly the result of acclimatization. PouchetT states that the negro regiments recruited near the Soudan *See De Quatrefages on this head, "Revue des Cours Scien- tifiques," Oct. 17, 1868, p. 731. | Livingstone's "Travels and Researches in S. Africa," 1857, pp. 338, 339. D'Orbigny, as quoted by Godron, " De 1'Espece," vol. ii, p. 2C6. \ See a paper read before the Royal Soc. in 1813 and published in his Essays in 1818. I have given an account of Dr. Wells' views in the Historical Sketch (p. 16) to my " Origin of Species." Various cases of color correlated with constitutional peculiarities are given in jny " Variation of Animals under Domestication," vol. ii, pp. 227,335. See, for instance, Nott and Gliddon, " Types of Mankind," p. 68, J Maj. Tulloch, in a paper read before the Statistical Society, April 80, 1840, and given in the "Athenaeum," 1840, p. 353. ^[" The Plurality of the H.m.an Race " (tranala.U 1864, r 60, THE RACES OF MAN. 221 an>), writes thus: "Gratiolet a eu entre les mains le cerveau d'un foetus de Gibbon, singe eminemment supe- rieur, et tellement rapproche de 1'orang, que des naturalistes tres-competents 1'ont range parmi les anthropoides. M. Huxley, par exemple, n'hesite pas sur ce point. En bien, c'est sur le cerveau d'un foetus de Gibbon que Gratiolet a vu " les oil-convolutions du lobe tempoio-sphenoidal deja dereloppees torsqu'U n'exist- ent pas encorj de plis sur le lobe frontal. II etait done bien autorise a dire que, chez 1'Homme les circonvolutions apparaissent d'a en w, tandis que chez lea singes elles se develoooent d'* aJi and in some cases can hardly be distinguished from them: we see instances of this in the complex append- ages at the apex of the abdomen in male insects. Unless indeed we confine the term " primary" to the reproductive SEXUAL SELECTION. 235 glands, it is scarcely possible to decide which ought to be called primary and which secondary. The female often differs from the male in having organs for the nourishment or protection of her young, such as the mammary glands of mammals and the abdominal sacks of the marsupials. In some few cases also the male possesses similar organs, which are wanting in the female, such as receptacles for the ova in certain male fishes, and those temporarily developed in certain male frogs. The females of most bees are provided with a special apparatus for col- lecting and carrying pollen, and their ovipositor is modified into a sting for the defense of the larvae and the community. Many similar cases could be given, but they do not here concern us. There are, however, other sexual differences quite unconnected with the primary reproductive organs, and it is with these that we are more especially concerned, such as the greater size, strength and pugnacity of the male, his weapons of offense or means of defense against rivals, his gaudy coloring and various ornaments, his power of song and other such characters. Besides the primary and secondary sexual differences, such as the foregoing, the males and females of some animals differ in structures related to different habits of life, and not at all, or only indirectly, to the repro- ductive functions. Thus the females of certain flies (Culicidae and Tabanidas) are blood-suckers, while the males, living on flowers, have mouths destitute of mandi- bles.* The males of certain moths and of some crustaceans (e. g. Tanais) have imperfect, closed mouths, and cannot feed. The complemental males of certain Cirripedes live like epiphytic plants either on the female or the hermaph- rodite form, and are destitute of a mouth and of prehensile limbs. In these cases it is the male which has been modi- fied and has lost certain important organs which the females possess. In other cases it is the female which has lost such parts; for instance, the female glow-worm is des- titute of wings, as also are many female moths, some of which never leave their cocoons. Many female parasitic crustaceans have lost their natatory legs. In some weevil- *Westwood, "Modern Class of Insects," vol. ii, 1840, p. 541. For the statement about Tanais, mentioned below, I am indebted to Fritz Mtiller. 236 THE DESCENT OF MAN. beetles (Curculionidge) there is a great difference between the male and the female in the length of the rostrum or snout; * but the meaning of this and of many analogous differences is not at all understood. Differences of structure between the two sexes in relation to different habits of life are generally confined to the lower animals; but with some few birds the beak of the male differs from that of the female. In the Huia of New Zealand the difference is wonderfully great, and we hear from Dr. Buller f that the male uses his strong beak in chiseling the larvse of insects out of decayed wood, while the female probes the softer parts with her far longer, much curved and pliant beak; and thus they mutually aid each other. In most cases differences of structure between the sexes are more or less directly connected with the propagation of the species; thus a female, which has to nourish a multitude of ova, requires more food than the male, and consequently requires special means for procuring it. A male animal, which lives for a very short time, might lose its organs for procuring food through disuse, without detriment; but he would retain his locomotive organs in a perfect state, so that he might reach the female. The female, on the other hand, might safely lose her organs for flying, swimming, or walking, if she gradually acquired habits which rendered such powers We are, however, here concerned only with sexual selec- tion. This depends on the advantage which certain indi- viduals have over others of the same sex and species solely in respect of reproduction. When, as in the cases above mentioned, the two sexes differ in structure in relation to different habits of life, they have no doubt been modified through natural selection, and by inheritance limited to one and the same sex. So again the primary sexual organs, and those for nourishing or protecting the young, come under the same influence; for those individuals which generated or nourished their offspring best, would leave, cceteris paribus, the greatest number to inherit their superiority; while those which generated or nourished their offspring badly would leave but few to inherit their weaker powers. As the male has to find the female he requires *Kirby and Spence, "Introduction to Entomology," vol. iii, 1826, p. 309. f " Birds of New Zealand," 1872, p. 66. SEXUAL SELECTION. 237 organs of sense and locomotion, but if these organs are necessary for the other purposes of life, as is generally the case, they will have been developed through natural selec- tion. When the male has found the female he sometimes absolutely requires prehensile organs to hold her; thus Dr. Wallace informs me that the males of certain moths cannot unite with the females if their tarsi or feet are broken. The males of many oceanic crustaceans, when adult, have their legs and antennae modified in an extraordinary manner for the prehension of the female; hence we may suspect that it is because these animals are washed about by the waves of the open sea that they require these organs in order to propagate their kind, and, if so, their develop- ment has been the result of ordinary or natural selection. Some animals extremely low in the scale have been modified for this same purpose; thus the males of certain parasitic worms, when fully grown, have the lower surface of the terminal part of their bodies roughened like a rasp, and with this they coil round and permanently hold the females.* When the two sexes follow exactly the same habits of life, and the male has the censory or locomotive organs more highly developed than those of the female, it may be that the perfection of these is indispensable to the male for finding the female; but in the vast majority of cases, they serve only to give one male an advantage over another, for with sufficient time the less well-endowed males would suc- ceed in pairing with the females; and judging from the structure of the female, they would be in all other respects equally well adapted for their ordinary habits of life. Since in such cases the males have acquired their present struct- ure not from being better fitted to survive in the struggle *M. Perrier advances this case ("Revue Scientifique," Feb. 1, 1873, p. 865) as one fatal to the belief in sexual selection, inasmuch as he supposes that I attribute all the differences between the sexes to sexual selection. This distinguished naturalist, therefore, like so many other Frenchmen, has not taken the trouble to understand even the first principles of sexual selection. An English naturalist insists that the claspers of certain male animals could not have been devel- oped threugh the choice of the female ! Had I not met with this remark I should not have thought it possible for any one to have read this chapter and to have imagined that I maintain that the choice of the female had anything to do with the development of the prehensile organs in the male. 238 THE DESCENT OF MAN. for existence, but from having gained an advantage ovei other males, and from having transmitted this advantage to their male offspring alone, sexual selection must here have come into action. It was the importance of this distinction which led me to designate this form of selection as sexual selection. So again, if the chief service rendered to the male by his prehensile organs is to prevent the escape of the female before the arrival of other males, or when assaulted by them these organs will have been perfected through sexual selection, that is, by the advantage acquired by certain individuals over their rivals. But in most cases of this kind it is impossible to distinguish between the effects of natural and sexual selection. Whole chapters could be filled with details on the differences between the sexes in their sensory, locomotive and prehensile organs. As, however, these structures are not more interesting than others adapted for the ordinary purposes of life I shall pass them over almost entirely, giving only a few instances under each class. There are many other structures and instincts which must have been developed through sexual selection, such as the weapons of offense and the means of defense of the males for fighting with and driving away their rivals their courage and pugnacity their various ornaments their contrivances for producing vocal or instrumental music and their glands for emitting odors, most of these latter structures serving only to allure or excite the female. It is clear that these characters are the result of sexual and not of ordinary selection, since unarmed, unornamented, or unattractive males would succeed equally well in the battle for life and in leaving a numerous progeny, but for the presence of better endowed males. We may infer that this would be the case, because the females, which are unarmed and unornamented, are able to survive and procreate their kind. Secondary "sexual characters of the kind just referred to, will be fully discussed in the following chap- ters, as being in many respects interesting, but especially as depending on the will, choice, and rivalry of the indi- viduals of either sex. When we bebold two males fighting for the possession of the female, or several male birds dis- playing their gorgeous plumage and performing strange antics before an assembled body of females, we cannot doubt that, though led by instinct, they know what they are SEXUAL SELECTION. 239 about, and consciously exert their mental and bodily powers. Just as man can improve the breed of his game-cocks by the selection of those birds which are victorious in the cock-pit, so it appears that the strongest and most vigorous males, or those provided with the best weapons, have pre- vailed under nature, and have led to the improvement of the natural breed or species. A slight degree of variability leading to some advantage, however slight, in reiterated deadly contests would suffice for the work of sexual selec- tion; and it is certain that secondary sexual characters are eminently variable. Just as man can give beauty, accord- ing to his standard of tase, to his male poultry, or more strictly can modify the beauty originally acquired by the parent species, can give to the Sebright bantam a new and elegant plumage, an erect and peculiar carriage so it appears that female birds in a state of nature have by a long selection of the more attractive males added to their beauty or other attractive qualities. No doubt this implies powers of discrimination and taste on the part of the female, which will at first appear extremely improb- able; but by the facts to be adduced hereafter, I hope to be able to show that the females actually have these powers. When, however, it is said that the lower animals have a sense of beauty, it must not be supposed that such sense is comparable with that of a cultivated man, with his multiform and complex associated ideas. A more just comparison would be between the taste for the beautiful in animals, and that in the lowest savages, who admire and deck themselves with any brilliant, glittering, or curious object. From our ignorance on several points, the precise manner in which sexual selection acts is somewhat uncertain. Nevertheless, if those naturalists who already believe in the mutability of species, will read the following chapters, they will, I think, agree with me that sectual selection has played an important part in the history of the organic world. It is certain that among almost all animals there is a struggle between the males for the possession of the female. ' This fact is so notorious that it would be super- fluous to give instances. Hence the females have the oppor- tunity of selecting one out of several males, on the suppo- sition that their mental capacity suffices for the exertion of 240 THE DESCENT OF MAN. a choice. In many cases special circumstances tend to make the struggle between the males particularly severe. Thus the males of our migratory birds generally arrive at their places of breeding before the females, so that many males are ready to contend for each female. I am informed by Mr. Jenner Weir,, that the bird-catchers assert that this is invariably the case with the nightingale and blackcap, and with respect to the latter he can himself confirm the statement. Mr. Swaysland, of Brighton, has been in the habit during the last forty years of catching our migratory birds on their first arrival, and he has never known the females of any species to arrive before their males. During one spring he shot thirty-nine males of Ray's wagtail (Budytes Itaii) before he saw a single female. Mr. Gould has ascer- tained by the dissection of those snipes which arrive the first in this country that the males come before the females. And the like holds good with most of the migratory birds of the United States.* The majority of the male salmon in our rivers on coming up from the sea are ready to breed before the females. So it appears to be with frogs and toads. Throughout the great class of insects the males almost always are the first to emerge from the pupal state, so that they generally abound for a time before any females can be seen, f The cause of this difference between the males and females in their periods of arrival and maturity is sufficiently obvious. Those males which annually f? :st migrated into any country, or which in the spring were first ready to breed, or the most eager, would leave the largest number of offspring; and these would tend to in- herit similar instincts and constitutions. It must be borne in mind that it would have been impossible to change very materially the time of sexual maturity in the females with- out at the same time interfering with the period of the *J. A. Allen on the "Mammals and \Vinter Birds of Florida,' 1 Bull. Comp. Zoology, Harvard College, p. 268. f Even with those plants in which the sexes are separate, the male flowers are generally mature before the female. As first shown by <"". K. Sprengel, many hermaphrodite plants are dichogamons; that is, their male and female organs are not ready at the same time, so that they cannot be self-fertilized. Now in such Mowers the pollen is in general matured before the stigma, though there are exceptional cases in which the female organs are beforehand. SEXUAL SELECTION. 241 production of the young a period which must be deter- mined by the seasons of the year. On the whole, there can be no doubt that with almost all animals in which the sexes are separate there is a constantly recurrent struggle between the males for the possession of the females. Our difficulty in regard to sexual selection lies in under- standing how it is that the males which conquer other males, or those which prove the most attrative to the females, leave a greater number of offspring to inherit their superiority than their beaten and less attractive rivals. Unless this result does follow the characters which give to certain males an advantage over others could not be per- fected and augmented through sexual selection. When the sexes exist in exactly equal numbers the worst endowed males will (except where polygamy prevails) ultimately find females and leave as many offspring as well fitted for their general habits of life as the best-endowed males. From various facts and considerations I formerly inferred that with most animals, in which secondary sexual charac- ters are well developed, the males considerably exceeded the females in number; but this is not by any means always true. If the males were to the females as two to one, or three to two, or even in a somewhat lower ratio the whole affair would be simple; for the better armed or more attractive males would leave the largest number of offspring. But after investigating as far as possible the numerical proportion of the sexes I do not believe that any great in- equality in number commonly exists. In most cases sexual selection appears to have been effective in the following manner: Let us take any species, a bird for instance, and divide the females inhabiting a district into two equal bodies, the one consisting of the more vigorous and better-nourished individuals, and the other of the less vigorous and healthy. The former, there can be little doubt, would be ready to breed in the spring before the others ; and this is the opinion of Mr. Jenner Weir, who has carefully attended to the habits of birds during many years. There can also be no doubt that the most vigorous, best-nourished and earliest breeders would on an average succeed in rearing the largest number of fine offspring.* The males, as we have * Here is excellent evidence on the character of the offspring from an experienced ornithologist. Mr. J. A. Allen, in speaking (" Main- 342 THE DESCENT OF MAN. seen, are generally ready to breed before the females; the strongest, and with some species the best armed of the males, drive away the weaker; and the former would then unite with the more vigorous and better-nourished females, because they are the first to breed.* Such vigorous pairs would surely rear a larger number of offspring than the retarded females, which would be compelled to unite with the conquered and less powerful males, supposing the sexes to be numerically equal; and this is all that is wanted to add, in the course of successive generations, to the size, strength and courage of the males, or to improve their weapons. But in very many cases the males which conquer their rivals do not obtain possession of the females, independently of the choice of the latter. The courtship of animals is by no means so simple and short an affair as might be thought. The females are most excited by, or prefer pair- ing with, the more ornamented males, or those which are the best songsters, or play the best antics; but it is obviously probable that they would at the same time prefer the more vigorous and lively males, and this has in some cases been confirmed by the actual observation.! Thus the more vigorous females, which are the first to breed, will have the choice of many males; and though they may not always select the strongest or best armed, they will select those which are vigorous and well armed, and in other respects the most attractive. Both sexes, therefore, of such early pairs would, as above explained, have an advantage over others in rearing offspring ; and this apparently has sufficed during a long course of generations to add not mals and Winter Birds of E. Florida," p. 229) of the later broods after the accidental destruction of the first, says that these " are found to be smaller and paler- colored than those hatched earlier in the sea- son. In cases where several broods are reared each year, as a general rule the birds of the earlier broods seem in all respects the most per- fect and vigorous." * Hermann Muller has come to this same conclusion with respect to those female bees which are the first to emerge from the pupa each year. See his remarkable essay, " Anwendung den Darwin'schen Lehre auf Bienen," " Verh. d. V. Jahrg.," xxix, p. 45. f With respect to poultry, I have received information, hereafter to be given, to this effect. Even with birds, such as pigeons, which pair for life, the female, as I hear from Mr. Jenner Weir, will desert her mate if he is injured or grows jiveak. SEXUAL SELEGTIOir. &3 only to the strength and fighting powers of the males, but likewise to their various ornaments or other attractions. In the converse and much rarer case of the males select- ing particular females it is plain that those which were the most vigorous and had conquered others would have the freest choice; and it is almost certain that they would select vigorous as well as attractive females. Such pairs would have an advantage in rearing offspring, more especially if the male had the power to defend the female during the pairing-season as occurs with some of the higher animals, or aided her in providing for the young. The same principles would apply if each sex preferred and selected certain individuals of the opposite sex; supposing that they selected not only the more attractive, but likewise the more vigor- ous individuals. Numerical Proportion of the Two Sexes. I have remarked that sexual selection would be a simple affair if the males were considerably more numerous than the females. Hence I was led to investigate, as far as I could, the proportions between the two sexes of as many animals as possible; but the materials are scanty. I will here give only a brief abstract of the results, retaining the details for a supple- mentary discussion so as not to interfere with the course of my argument. Domesticated animals alone afford the means of ascertaining the proportional numbers at birth; but no records have been specially kept for this purpose. By indirect means, however, I have collected a considerable body of statistics, from which it appears that with most of our domestic animals the sexes are nearly equal at birth. Thus 25, 560 births of race-horses have been recorded during twenty-one years, and the male births were to the female births as 99.7 to 100. In greyhounds the inequality is greater than with any other animal, for out of 6,878 births during twelve years, the male births were to the female as 110.1 to 100. It is, however, in some degree doubtful whether it is safe to infer that the proportion would be the same under natural conditions as under domestication; for slight and unknown differences in the conditions affect the proportion of the sexes. Thus with mankind, the male births in England are as 104.5, in Eussia as 108.9, and with the Jews of Livonia as 120 to 100 female births. But I shall recur to this curious point of the excess of male births 244 THE DESCENT OF MAN. in the supplement to this chapter. At the Cape of Good Hope, however, male children of Europeon extraction have been born during several years in the proportion of between 90 and 99 to 100 female children. For our present purpose we are concerned with the pro- portion of the sexes, not only at birth, but also at maturity, and this adds another element of doubt; for it is a well- ascertained fact that with man the number of males dying before or during birth and during the first few years of infancy is considerably larger than that of females. So it almost certainly is with male lambs, and probably with some other animals. The males of some species kill one another by fighting; or they drive one another about until they become greatly emaciated. They must also be often exposed to various dangers while wandering about in eager search for the females. In many kinds of fish the males are much smaller than the females, and they are believed often to be devoured by the latter or by other fishes. The females of some birds appear to die earlier than the males; they are also liable to be destroyed on their nests or while in charge of their young. With insects the female larvae are often larger than those of the males, and woiild conse- quently be more likely to be devoured. In some cases the mature females are less active and less rapid in their move- ments than the males and could not escape so well from danger. Hence, with animals in a state of nature we must rely on mere estimation in order to judge of the propor- tions of the sexes at maturity; and this is but little trust- worthy except when the inequality is strongly marked. Nevertheless, as far as a judgment can be formed, we may conclude from the facts given in the supplement that the males of some few mammals, of many birds, of some fish and insects, are considerably more numerous than the females. The proportion between the sexes fluctuates slightly during successive years; thus with race-horses, for every 100 mares born the stallions varied from 107.1 in one year to 92.6 in another year, and with greyhounds from 116.3 to 95.3. But had larger numbers been tabulated through- out an area more extensive than England these fluctuations would probably have disappeared; and such as they are, would hardly suffice to lead to effective sexual selection in a state of nature. Nevertheless, in the cases of some few SEXUAL SELECTION. 245 wild animals, as shown in the supplement, the proportions seem to fluctuate either during different seasons or in dif- ferent localities in a sufficient degree to lead to such selec- tion. For it should be observed that any advantage gained during certain years or in certain localities by those males which were able to conquer their rivals, or were the most attractive to the females, would probably be transmitted to the offspring and would not subsequently be eliminated. During the succeeding seasons, when from the equality of the sexes every male was able to procure a female, the stronger or more attractive males previously produced would still have at least as good a chance of leaving offspring as the weaker or less attractive. Polygamy. The practice of polygamy leads to the same results as would follow from an actual inequality in the number of the sexes; for if each male secures two or more females many males cannot pair; and the latter assuredly will be the weaker or less attractive individuals. Many mammals and some few birds are polygamous, but with animals belonging to the lower classes I have found no evi- dence of this habit. The intellectual powers of such ani- mals are, perhaps, not sufficient to lead them to collect and guard a harem of females. That some relation exists be- tween polygamy and the development of secondary sexual characters appears nearly certain ; and this supports the view that a numerical preponderance of males would be eminently favorable to the action of sexual selection. Nevertheless many animals which are strictly monogamous, especially birds, display strongly marked secondary sexual characters; while some few animals which are polygamous do not have such characters. We will first briefly run through the mammals and then turn to birds. The gorilla seems to be polygamous, and the male differs considerably from the female; so it is with some baboons/ Which live in herds containing twice as many adult females as males. In South America the Mycetes caraya presents well-marked sexual differences, in. color, -beard, and vocal organs ; and the male generally lives with two or three wives; the male of the Cebus capuci- nu$ differs somewhat from the female, and appears to be 246 THE DESCENT OF MAN. polygamous.* Little is known on this head with respect to most other monkeys, but some species are strictly monoga- mous. The ruminants are eminently polygamous,, and they present sexual differences more frequently than almost any other group of mammals; this holds good, especially in their weapons, but also in other characters. Most deer, cattle, and sheep are polygamous; as are most antelopes, though some are monogamous. Sir Andrew Smith, in speaking of the antelopes of S. Africa, says that in herds of about a dozen there was rarely more than one mature male. The Asiatic Antilope saiga appears to be the most inordinate polygamist in the world; for Pallas f states that the male drives away all rivals and collects a herd of about a hundred females and kids together; the female is hornless and has softer hair, but does not otherwise differ much from the male. The wild horse of the Falkland Islands and of the Western States of North America is polygamous, but, except in his greater size and the propor- tions of his body, differs but little from the mare. The wild boar presents well-marked sexual characters, in his great tusks and some other points. In Europe and in India he leads a solitary life, except during the breeding-season ; but as is believed by Sir W. Elliot, who has had many opportunities in India of observing this animal, he consorts at this season with several females. Whether this holds good in Europe is doubtful, but it is supported by some evidence. The adult male Indian elephant, like the boar, passes much of his time in solitude; but as Dr. Campbell states, when with others, " it is rare to find more than one male with a whole herd of females ;" the larger males expelling or killing the smaller and weaker ones. The male differs from the female in his immense tusks, greater size, strength and endurance; so great is the difference in these respects, that the males when caught are valued at *On the Gorilla, Savage and Wyman, "Boston Journal of Nat. Hist.," vol. v, 1845-47, p. 423. On Cynocephalus, Brebm, " lllust. Thierleben," B.i, 1864, s. 77. On Mycetes, Rengger, " Naturgesch. : Saugethiere von Paraguay," 1830, ss. 14, 20. Cebus, Brehm, ibid, s. t Pallas, "Spicilegia Zoolog., Fasc.," xii, 1777, p. 29. Sir Andrew Smith, " Illustrations of the Zoology of S. Africa," 1849, pi. 29, on the Kobus. Owen, in his " Anatomy of Vertebrates " (vol. iii, 1868, p. 633) gives a table showing incidentally which species of antelopes are gregarious. SEXUAL SELECTION. 247 one-fifth more than the females.* The sexes of other pachydermatous animals differ very little or not at all, and, as far as known, they are not polygamists. Nor have I heard of any species in the orders of Cheiroptera, Edentata, Insectivora and Rodents being polygamous, excepting that among the Eodents, the common rat, according to some rat-catchers, lives with several females. Nevertheless the two sexes of some sloths (Edentata) differ in the character and color of certain patches of hair on their shoulders, f And many kinds of bats (Cheiroptera) present well- marked sexual differences, chiefly in the males possessing odoriferous glands and pouches, and by their being of a lighter color. J In the great order of Rodents, as far as I can learn, the sexes rarely differ, and when they do so it is but slightly in the tint of the fur. As I hear from Sir Andrew Smith, the lion in S. Africa sometimes lives with a single female, but generally with more, and, in one case, was found with as many as five females; so that he is polygamous. As far as I can dis- cover he is the only polygamist among all the terrestrial Carnivora, and he alone presents well-marked sexual char- acters. If, however, we turn to the marine Carnivora, as we shall hereafter see, the case is widely different; for many species of seals offer extraordinary sexual differences, and they are eminently polygamous. Thus, according to Peron, the male sea -elephant of the Southern Ocean always possesses several females, and the sea-lion of Forster is said to be surrounded by from twenty to thirty females. In the North the male sea-bear of Steller is accompanied by even a greater number of females. It is an interesting fact, as Dr. Gill remarks, that in the monogamous species, " or those living in small communities, there is little differ- ence in size between the males and females; in the social species, or rather those of which the males have harems, the males are vastly larger than the females. " *Dr. Campbell, in " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1869, p. 138. See also an interesting paper, by Lieut. Joknstone, in ' ' Proc. Asiatic Soc. of Bengal," May, 1868. fDr. Gray, in "Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," 1871, p. 302. fSee Dr. Dobson's excellent paper in "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1873, p. 241. The Eared Seals, " American Naturalist," vol. iv, Jan., 1871. 248 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Among birds, many species, the sexes of which differ greatly from each other, are certainly monogamous. In Great Britain we see well-marked sexual differences, for instance, in the wild duck which pairs with a single female, the common blackbird, and the bullfinch which is said to pair for life. I am informed by Mr. Wallace that the like is true of the Chatterers or Cotingidse of South America, and of many other birds. In several groups I have not been able to discover whether the species are polygamous or monogamous. Lesson says that birds of paradise, sc remarkable for their sexual differences, are potygamous, but Mr. Wallace doubts whether he had sufficient evidence. Mr. Salvin tells me he has been led to believe that hum- ming - birds are polygamous. The male widow - bird, remarkable for his caudal plumes, certainly seems to be a polygamist.* I have been assured by Mr. Jenner Weir and by others that it is somewhat common for three starlings to frequent the same nest; but whether this is a case of polygamy or polyandry has not been ascertained. The Gallinaceae exhibit almost as strongly marked sexual differences as birds of paradise or humming-birds, and many of the species are, as is well known, polygamous; others being strictly monogamous. What a contrast is pre- sented between the sexes of the polygamous peacock or pheasant, and the monogamous guinea-fowl or partridge! Many similar cases could be given, as in the grouse tribe, in which the males of the polygamous capercailzie and black-cock differ greatly from the females; while the sexes of the monagamous red grouse and ptarmigan differ very little. In the Cursores, except among the bustards, few species offer strongly-marked sexual differences, and the great bustard ( Otis tarda) is said to be polygamous. With the Grallatores extremely few species differ sexually, but the ruff (Machetes pitgnax) affords a marked exception and this species is believed by Montagu to be a polygamist. Hence it appears that among birds there often exists a close relation between polygamy and the development of strongly - *"The Ibis," vol. iii, 1861, p. 133, on the Progne Widow-bird. See also on tbe Vidua axillaris, ibid., vol. ii, 1860, p. 211. On the polygamy of the Capercailzie and Great Bustard, see L. Lloyd, "Game "Birds of Sweden," 1867, pp. 19, 182. Montagu and Selby speak of the Black Grouse as polygamous and of the Bed Grouse aa monogamous. SELUAL SELECTION. 249 marked sexual differences. I asked Mr. Bartlett, of the Zoological Gardens, who has had very large experience with birds, whether the male &ragopan (one of the Gailin- acese) was polygamous, and I was struck by his answering, " I do not know, but should think so from his splendid colors." It deserves notice that the instinct of pairing with a single female is easily lost under domestication. The wild-duck is strictly monogamous, the domestic duck highly polyga- mous. The Rev. W. D. Fox informs me that out of some half -tamed wild ducks, on a large pond in his neighbor- hood, so many mallards were shot by the gamekeeper that only one was left for every seven or eight females; yet unusually large broods were reared. The guinea-fowl is strictly monogamous; but Mr. Fox finds that his birds suc- ceed best when he keeps one cock to two or three hens. Canary-birds pair in a state of nature, but the breeders in England successfully put one male to four or five females. I have noticed these cases as rendering it probable that wild monogamous species might readily become either tem- porarily or permanently polygamous. Too little is known of the habits of reptiles and fishes to enable us to speak of their marriage arrangements. The stickle-back (Gasterosteus), however, is said to be a polyg- aniist;* and the male during the breeding season differs conspicuously from the female. To sum up on the means through which, as far as we can judge, sexual selection has led to the development of second- ary sexual characters. It has been shown that the largest number of vigorous offspring will be reared from the pair- ing of the strongest and best-armed males, victorious in contests over other males, with the most vigorous and best- nourished females, which are the first to breed in the spring. If such females select the more attractive, and at the same time vigorous males, they will rear a larger number of off- spring than the retarded females, which must pair with the less vigorous and less attractive males. So it will be if the more vigorous males select the more attractive and at the same timg healthy and vigorous females; and this will espe- cially hold good if the male defends the female and aids in providing food for the young. The advantage thus *Noel Humphreys, " River Gardens," 1857. 250 THE DESCENT OF MAN. gained by the more vigorous pairs in rearing a larger number of offspring has apparently sufficed to render sex- ual selection efficient. But a large numerical preponder- ance of males over females will be still more efficient; whether the preponderance is only occasional and local, or permanent; whether it occurs at birth, or afterward from the greater destruction of the females; or whether it in- directly follows from the practice of polygamy. The Male Generally More Modified than the Female. Throughout the animal kingdom when the sexes differ in external appearance, it is, with rare exceptions, the male which has been the more modified; for, generally, the female retains a closer resemblance to the young of her own species and to other adult members of the same group. The cause of this seems to lie in the males of almost all animals having stronger passions than the females. Hence it is the males that fight together and sedulously display their charms before the females; and the victors transmit their superiority to their male offspring. Why both sexes | do not thus acquire the characters of their fathers will be I considered hereafter. That the males of all mammals eagerly pursue the females is notorious to every one. So it is with birds; but many cock birds do not so much pursue the hen, as display their plumage, perform strange antics, and pour forth their song in her presence. The male in the few fish observed seerns much more eager than the female; and the same is true of alligators, and apparently of Batrachians. Throughout the enormous class of insects, as Kirby remarks,* " the law is that the male shall seek the female," Two good authorities, Mr. Blackwall and Mr. C. Spencc Bate, tell me that the males of spiders and crusta- ceans are more active and more erratic in their habits than the females. When the organs of sense or locomotion are present in the one sex of insects and cru ing part of one of the abdominal segments. In the nearly allied Oopris lunaris an excessively narrow fine rasp runs along the sutural margin of the elytra with another short rasp near the basal outer margin; but in some other Coprini the rasp is seated, according to * Schiodte, translated in " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. xx, 1867, p. 37. fWestring has described (Kroyer, "Naturhist. Tidskrift," B. ii, 1848-1849, p. 334) the stridulating organs in these two, as well as in other families. In the Carabidse I have examined Elaphrus uligi- nosus and BletMsa multipunctata, sent to me by Mr. Crotch. In Blethisa fhe transverse ridges on the furrowed border of the abdom- inal segment do not, as far as I could judge, come into play in scrap- ing the rasps on the elytra. Hind leg of Geotrupes stercorarius. From Landois r. Rasp. c. Coxa. 344 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Leconte,* on the dorsal surface of the abdomen. In Oryctes it is seated on the propygidium; and, according to the same entomologist, in some other Dynastiui on the under surface of the elytra. Lastly, "\Vestring states that in OmalopUa brunnea the rasp is placed on the pro-sternum and the scraper on the meta-sternum, the parts thus occu- pying the under surf ace -of the body instead of the upper surface, as in the Longicoms. We thus see that in the different coleopterous families the stridulating organs are wonderfully, diversified in position, but not much in structure. Within the same family some species are provided with these organs, and others are destitute of them. This diversity is intelligible, if we suppose that originally various beetles made a shuf- fling or hissing noise by the rubbing together of any hard and rough parts of their bodies, which happened to be in contact; and that from the noise thus produced being in some way useful, the rough surfaces were gradually devel- oped into regular stridulatiug organs. Some beetles as they move now produce, either intentionally or unintentionally, a shuffling noise without possessing any proper organs for the purpose. Mr. Wallace informs me that the Eucliirus longimanus (a Lamellicorn, with the anterior legs wonder- fully elongated in the male) " makes, while moving, a low hissing sound by the protrusion and contraction of the abdomen ; and when seized it produces a grating sound by rubbing its hind legs against the edges of the elytra." The hissing sound is clearly due to a narrow rasp running along the sutural margin of each elytron; and I could like- wise make the grating sound by nibbing the shagreened sur- face of the femur against the granulated margin of the cor- responding elytron; but I could not here detect any proper rasp; nor is it likely that I could have overlooked it in so large an insect. After examining Cychrus, and reading what Westring has written about this beetle, it seems very doubtful whether it possesses any true rasp, though it has the power of emitting a sound. From the analogy of the Orthoptera and Homoptera, I expected to find the stridulating organs in the Colpeotera differing according to sex; but Landois, who has carefully * I am indebted to Mr. Walsh, of Illinois, for having sent me ex- tracts from Leconte's " Introduction to Entomology," pp. 101, 143. INSECTS. 345 examined several species, observed no snch difference; nor did Westring; nor did Mr. Gr. R. Crotch in preparing the many specimens winch he had the kindness to send me. Any difference in these organs, if slight, would, however, be difficult to detect, on account of their great variability. Thus, in the first pair of specimens of Necrophorus humator and of PeloMus which I examined, the rasp was considerably larger in the male than in the female; but not so with succeeding specimens. In Geotrupes stercorarius the rasp appeared to me thicker, opaquer and more prominent in three males than in the same number of females ; in order, therefore, to discover whether the sexes differed in their power of stridulat- ing, my son, Mr. F. Darwin, collected fifty-seven living specimens, which he separated into two lots, according as they made a greater or lesser noise, when held in the same manner. He then examined all these specimens and found that the males were very nearly in the same proportion to the females in both the lots". Mr. F. Smith has kept alive numerous specimens of Monoynchus pseudacori (Cur- culionida?), and is convinced that both sexes stridulate, and apparently in an equal degree. Nevertheless, the power of stridulating is certainly a sexual character in some few Coleoptera. Mr. Crotch dis- covered that the males alone of two species of Heliopathes (Tenebrionidae) possess stridulating organs. I examined five males of H. gibbus, and in all these there was a well- developed rasp, partially divided into two, on the dorsal surface of the terminal abdominal segment; while in the same number of females there was not even a rudiment of the rasp, the membrane of this segment being transparent and much thinner than in the male. In H. cribratostriatus the male has a similar rasp, excepting that it is not par- tially divided into two portions, and the female is com- pletely destitute of this organ; the male in addition has on the apical margins of the elytra, on each side of the suture, three or four short longitudinal ridges, which are crossed by extremely fine ribs, parallel to and resembling those on the abdominal rasp; whether these ridges serve as an inde- pendent rasp or as a scraper for the abdominal rasp, I could not decid"e ; the female exhibits no trace of this latter structure. Again, in three species of the Lamellicorn genus Oryc- 346 THE DESCENT OF MAN. tes, we have a nearly parallel case. In the females of 0. gryplius and nasicornis the ribs on the rasp of the pro- pygidium are less continuous and less distinct than in the males; but the chief difference is that the whole upper sur- face of this segment, when held in the proper light, is seen to be clothed with hairs, which are absent or are repre- sented by excessively fine down in the males. It should be noticed that in all Coleoptera the effective part of the rasp is destitute of hairs. In 0. senegalensis the difference be- tween the sexes is more strongly marked, and this is best Been when the proper abdominal segment is cleaned and viewed as a transparent object. In the female the whole surface is covered with little separate crests bearing spines; while in the male these crests, in proceeding toward the apex, become more and more confluent, regular and naked; so that three-fourths of the segment is covered with ex- tremely fine parallel ribs, which are quite absent in the female. In the females, however, of all three species of Oryctes, a slight grating or stridulating sound is produced when the abdomen of a softened specimen is pushed back- ward and forward. In the case of the Heliopathes and Oryctes there can hardly be a doubt that the males stridulate in order to call or to excite the females; but with most beetles the stridu- lation apparently serves both sexes as a mutual call. Beetles stridulate under various emotions, in the same manner as birds use their voices for many purposes besides singing to their mates. The great Chiasognathus stridu- lates in anger or defiance; many species do the same from distress or fear, if held so that they cannot escape ; by striking the hollow stems of trees in the Canary Islands, Messrs. Wollaston and Crotch were able to discover the presence of beetles belonging to the genus Acalles by their stridulation. Lastly, the male Ateuchus stridulates to en- courage the female in her work, and from distress when she is removed.* Some naturalists believe that beetles make this noise to frighten away their enemies; but I cannot think that a quadruped or bird, able to devour a large beetle, would be frightened by so slight a sound. The belief that the stridulation serves as a sexual call is sup- M. P. de la Brulerie, as quoted in " Journal of Travel," A. Mur- raj, vol. I, 1868, p. 185. INSECTS. 347 ported by the fact that death-ticks (Anolium tessellatum) are well known to answer each other's ticking, and, as I have myself observed, a tapping noise artificially made. Mr. Doubleday also informs me that he has sometimes ob- served a female ticking,* and in an hour or two afterward has found her united with a male, and on one occasion sur- rounded by several males. Finally, it is probable that the two sexes of many kinds of beetles were at first enabled to find each other by the slight shuffling noise produced by the rubbing together of the adjoining hard parts of their bodies; and that as those males or females which made the greatest noise succeeded best in finding partners, rugosities on various parts of their bodies were gradually developed by means of sexual selection into true stridulating organs. * According to Mr. Doubleday, "the noise is produced by the insect raising itself on its legs as high as it can, and then striking its thorax five or six times in rapid succession against the substance upon which it is sitting." For references on this subject see Landois, " Zeitschrift f iir wissen. Zoolog.," B. xvii, s. 131. Olivier says (as quoted by Kirby and Spence, " Introduct.," vol. ii, p. 395) that the female of Pimelia striata produces a rather loud sound by striking her abdomen against any hard substance, " and that the male, obedi- ent to this call, soon attends her, and they pair." 348 THE DESCENT OF MAN. CHAPTER XI. INSECTS, continued. OEDEE LEPIDOPTERA. (BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS.) Courtship of butterflies Battles Ticking noise Colors common to both sexes, or more brilliant in the males Examples Not due to the direct action of the conditions of life Colors adapted for protection Colors of moths Display Perceptive powers of the Lepidoptera Variability Causes of the difference in color between the males and females Mimicry, female butterflies more brilliantly colored than the males Bright colors of caterpillars Summary and concluding remarks on the secondary sexual char- acters of insects Birds and insects compared. IN this great order the most interesting points for us are the differences in color between the sexes of the same species, and between the distinct species of the same genus. Nearly the whole of the following chapter will be devoted to this subject; but I will first make a few remarks on one or two other points. Several males may often be seen pur- suing and crowding round the same female. Their court- ship appears to be a prolonged affair, for I have frequently watched one or more males pirouetting round a female until I was tired, without seeing the end of the courtship. Mr. A. G. Butler also informs me that he has several times watched a male courting a female for a full quarter of an hour; but she pertinaciously refused him, and at last set- tled on the ground and closed her wings, so as to escape from his addresses. Although butterflies are weak and fragile creatures, they are pugnacious, and an Emperor butterfly* has been capt- ured with the tips of its wings broken from a conflict with another male. Mr. Collingwood, in speaking of the fre- quent battles between the butterflies of Borneo, says: " They * Apatura Iris: "The Entomologist's Weekly Intelligence," 1859, p. 189. For the Bornean Butterflies, see C. Collingwood, " Ramble* of a Naturalist." 1868, p. 183. INSECTS. 349 whirl round each other with the greatest rapidity, and appear to be incited by the greatest ferocity." The Ageronia feionia makes a noise like that produced by a toothed wheel passing under a spring catch, and which can be Jieard at the distance of several yards; I noticed this sound at Rio de Janeiro, only when two of these butterflies were chasing each other in an irregular course, so that it is probably made during the courtship of the sexes.* Some moths also produce sounds; for instance, the males of Thecophora fovea. On two occasions Mr. P. Buchanan White f heard a sharp quick noise made by the male of Hylophila prasinana, and which he believes to be produced, as in Cicada, by an elastic membrane, furnished with a muscle. He quotes, also, Guenee, that Setina produces a sound like the ticking of a watch, apparently by the aid of " two large tympaniform vesicles, situated in the pectoral region;" and these "are much more developed in the male than in the female." Hence the sound-producing organs in the Lepidoptera appear to stand in some relation with the sexual functions. I have not alluded to the well-known noise made by the Death's Head Sphinx, for it is generally heard soon after the moth has emerged from its cocoon. Giard has always observed that the musky odor, which is emitted by two species of Sphinx moths, is peculiar to the males; \ and in the higher classes we shall meet with many instances of the males alone being odoriferous. Every one must have admired the extreme beauty of many butterflies and of some moths; and it may be asked, are their colors and diversified patterns the result of the direct action of the physical conditions to which these insects have been exposed, without any benefit being thus derived? Or have successive variations been accumulated and determined as a protection, or for some unknown pur- pose, or that one sex may be attractive to the other? And, * See my "Journal of Researches," 1845, p. 33. Mr. Doubleday Las detected ("Proc. Ent. Soc.," March 3, 1845, p. 123) a peculiar membranous sac at the base of the front wings, which is probably connected-with the production of the sound. For the case of Theco- phora, see "Zoological Record," 1869, p. 401. For Mr. Buchanan White's observations, " The Scottish Naturalist," July, 1872, p. 214. f "The Scottish Naturalist," July, 1872, p. 213. t " Zoological Record," 1869, p. 347. 350 THE DESCENT OF MAN. again, what is the^meaning of the colors being widely dif- ferent in the males and females of certain species, and alike in the two sexes of other species of the same genus? Before attempting to answer these questions a body of facts must be given. With our beautiful English butterflies, the admiral, pea- cock, and painted lady (Vanessae), as well as many others, the sexes are alike. This is also the case with the magnifi- cent Heliconidae, and most of the Danaidae in the tropics. But in certain other tropical groups, and in some of our English butterflies, as the purple emperor, orange-tip, etc. (Apatura Iris and Anthocharis cardamines), the sexes differ either greatly or slightly in color. No language suf- fices to describe the splendor of the males of some tropical species. Even within the same genus we often find species presenting extraordinary differences between the sexes, while others have their sexes closely alike. Thus in the South American genus Epicalia, Mr. Bates, to whom I am indebted for most of the following facts, and for looking over this whole discussion, Informs me that he knows twelve species, the two sexes of which haunt the same stations (and this is not always the case with butterflies), and which, therefore, cannot have been differently affected by external conditions.* In nine of these twelve species the males rank among the most brilliant of all butterflies, and differ so greatly from the comparatively plain females that they were formerly placed in distinct genera. The females of these nine species resemble each other in their general type of coloration; and they likewise resemble both sexes of the species in several allied genera found in various parts of the world. Hence we may infer that these nine species, and probably all the others of the genus, are descended from an ancestral form which was colored in nearly the same manner. In the tenth species the female still retains the same general coloring, but the male resembles her, so that he is colored in a much less gaudy and contrasted manner than the males of the previous species. In the eleventh and twelfth species the females depart from the usual type, for they are gayly decorated almost like the * See also Mr, Bates' paper in " Proc. Ent. Soc. of Philadelphia," 1865, p. 206. Also Mr, Wallace on the same subject, in regard to Diadema, in "Transact. Entomolog. Soc. of London," 1869, p. 278. INSECTS. 351 males, but in a somewhat less degree. Hence in these two latter species the bright colors of the males seem to have been transferred to the females; while in the tenth species the male has either retained or recovered the plain colors of the female, as well as of the parent-form of the genus. The sexes in these three cases have thus been rendered nearly alike, though in an opposite manner. In the allied genus Eubagis, both sexes of some of the species are plain-colored and nearly alike; while the greater number of the males are decorated with beautiful metallic tints in a diversified manner, and differ much from their females. The females throughout the genus retain the same general style of coloring, so that they resemble one another much more closely than they resemble their oAvn males. In the genus Papilio all the species of the ^Eneas group are remarkable for their conspicuous and strongly con- trasted colors, and they illustrate the frequent tendency to gradation in the amount of difference between the sexes. In a few species, for instance in P. ascanius, the males and females are alike; in others the males' are either a little brighter, or very much more superb than the females. The genus Junonia, allied to our Vanessae, offers a nearly parallel case, for although the sexes of most of the species resemble each other, and are destitute of rich colors, yet in certain species, as in /. cenone, the male is rather more bright - colored than the female, and in a few (for instance J. andremiaja) the male is so different from the female that he might be mistaken for an entirely distinct species. Another striking case was pointed out to me in the Brit- ish Museum by Mr. A. Butler, namely, one of the tropical American Theclae, in which both sexes are nearly alike and wonderfully splendid; in another species the male is colored in a similarly gorgeous manner, while the whole upper surface of the female is of a dull uniform brown. Our common little English blue butterflies of the genus Lycaena illustrate the various differences iu color between the sexes almost as well, though not in so striking a manner, as the above exotic genera. In Lyccena agestis both sexes have wings of a brown color, bordered with small ocellated orange spots and are thus alike. In L. cegon the wings of the male are of a fine blue bordered with black, while those of the female are brown with a similar border closely 352 THE DESCENT OF MAN. resembling the wings of L. agestis. Lastly, in L. arion both sexes are of a blue color and are very like, though in the female the edges of the wings are rather duskier with the black spots plainer; and in a bright-blue Indian species both sexes are still morte alike. I have given the foregoing details in order to show, in the first place, that when the sexes of butterflies differ the male as a general rule is the more beautiful and departs more from the usual type of coloring of the group to which the species belongs. Hence in most groups the females of the several species resemble each other much more closely than do the males. In some cases, however, to which I shall hereafter allude, the females are colored more splen- didly than the males. In the second place, these details have been given to bring clearly before the mind that within the same genus the two sexes frequently present every gradation from no difference in color to so great a difference that it was long before the two were placed by entomologists in the same genus. In the third place, we have seen that when the sexes nearly resemble each other this appears due either to the male having transferred his colors to the female, or to the male having retained or per- haps recovered the primordial colors of the group. It also deserves notice that in those groups in which the sexes differ the females usually somewhat resemble the males, so that when the males are beautiful to an extraordinary degree the females almost invariably exhibit some degree of beauty. From the many cases of gradation in the amount of difference between the sexes, and from the prev- alence of the same general type of coloration throughout the whole of the same group, we may conclude that the causes have generally been the same which have determined the brilliant coloring of the males alone of some species, and of both sexes of other species. As so many gorgeous butterflies inhabit the tropics it has often been supposed that they owe their colors to the great heat and moisture of these zones; but Mr. Bates* has shown by the comparison of various closely-allied groups of insects from the temperate and tropical regions that this view cannot be maintained; and the evidence becomes con- clusive when brilliantly colored males and plain colored * "The Naturalist cm the Amazons," vol. i, 1863, p. 19. INSECTS. 353 females of the same species inhabit the same district, feed on the same food and follow exactly the same habits of life. Even when the sexes resemble each other we can hardly believe that their brilliant and beautifully arranged colors are the purposeless result of the nature of the tissues ani of the action of the surrounding conditions. "With animals of all kinds, whenever color has been modified for some special purpose, -this has been, as far as we can judge, either for direct or indirect protection, or as an attraction between the sexes. With many species of butterflies the upper surfaces of the wings are obscure; and this in all probability leads to their escaping observation and danger. But butterflies would be particularly liable to be attacked by their enemies when at rest; and most kinds while resting raise their wings vertically over their backs, so that the lower surface alone is exposed to view. Hence it is this side which is often colored so as to imitate the objects on which these insects commonly rest. Dr. Eossler, I believe, first noticed the similarity of the closed wings of certain Vanessae and other butterflies to the bark of trees. Many analogous and striking facts could be given. The most interesting one is that recorded by Mr. Wallace* of a common Indian and Sumatran butterfly (Kallima), which disappears like magic when it settles on a bush; for it hides its head and antennas between its closed wings, which, in form, color and veining, cannot be distinguished from a withered leaf with its footstalk. In some other cases the lower surfaces of the wings are brilliantly colored, and yet are protective; thus in Thecla rubi the wings when closed are of an emerald green and resemble the young leaves of the bramble, on which in spring this butterfly may often be seen seated. It is also remarkable that in very many species in which the sexes differ greatly in color on their upper surface, the lower surface is closely similar or identical in both sexes, and serves as a protection, f Although the obscure tints both of the upper and under sides of many butterflies no doubt serve to conceal them, yet we cannot extend this view to the brilliant and conspicuous colors on the upper surface of such species as our admiral and * See the interesting article in the " Westminster Review," July, 1867, p, 10, A wood-cut of the Kallima is given by Mr. Wallace iu "Hardwicke's Science Gossip," Sept., 1867, p. 196. | Mr. Q. Fraser, in "Nature," April, 1871, p. 489. 354 THK DESCENT OF MAN. peacock Vanessae, our white cabbage-butterflies (Pieris), or the great swallow-tail Papilio which haunts the open fens for these butterflies are thus rendered visible to every living creature. In these species both sexes are alike; but in the common brimstone butterfly (Gonepteryx rliamni], the male is of an intense yellow, while the female is much paler; and in the orange-tip (Anthocharis cardamines) the males alone have their wings tipped with bright orange. Both the males and females in these cases are conspicuous, and it is not credible that their difference in color should stand in any relation to ordinary protection. Prof. Weismann remarks * that the female of one of the Lycasnas expands her brown wings when she settles on the ground, and is then almost invisible; the male, on the other hand, as if aware of the danger incurred from the bright blue of the upper surface of his wings, rests with them closed; and this shows that the blue color cannot be in any way protective. Nevertheless, it is probable that conspicuous colors are indirectly beneficial to many species, as a warning that they are unpalatable. For in certain other cases, beauty has been gained through the imitation of other beautiful species, which inhabit the same district and enjoy an im- munity from attack by being in some way offensive to their enemies; but then we have to account for the beauty of the imitated species. As Mr. Walsh has remarked to me, the females of our orange-tip butterfly, above referred to, and of an American species (Anth. genutia) probably show us the primordial colors of the parent-species of the genus; for both sexes of four or five widely-distributed species are colored in nearly the same manner. As in several previous cases, we may here infer that it is the males of Anth. cardamines and genutia which have departed from the usual type of the genus. In the Anth. sara from California, the orange tips to the wings have been partially developed in the female ; but they are paler than in the male, and slightly different in some other respects. In an allied Indian form, the Iphias glaucippe, the orange-tips are fully developed in both sexes. In this Iphias, as pointed out to me by Mr. A. Butler, the under surface of the wings marvelously resem- bles a pale-colored leaf; and in our English orange-tip, the * Einfluss der leolirung auf di. Artbildung," 1872, p. 68- INSECTS. 355 under surface resembles the flower-head of the wild parsley, on which the butterfly often rests at night.* The same reason which compels us to believe that the lower surfaces have here been colored for the sake of protection, leads us to deny that the wings have been tipped with bright orange for the same purpose, especially when this character is con- fined to the males. Most moths rest motionless during the whole or greater part of the day with their wings depressed; and the whole upper surface is often shaded and colored in an admirable manner, as Mr. Wallace has remarked, for escaping detec- tion. The front-wings of the Bombycidae and N"octuidae,f when at rest, generally overlap and conceal the hind wings; so that the latter might be brightly colored without much risk; and they are in fact often thus colored. During flight, moths would often be able to escape from their ene- mies; nevertheless, as the hind wings are then fully exposed to view, their bright colors must generally have been acquired at some little risk. But the following fact shows how cautious we ought to be in drawing conclusions on this head. The common yellow under wings (Triphaena) often fly about during the day or early evening, and are then conspicuous from the color of their hind wings. It would naturally be thought that this would be a source of danger; but Mr. J. Jenner Weir believes that it actually serves them as a means of escape, for birds strike at these brightly colored and fragile surfaces, instead of at the body. For instance, Mr. Weir turned into his aviary a vigorous speci- men of TripJicena pronuba, which was instantly pursued by a robin: but the bird's attention being caught by the col- ored wings, the moth was not captured until after about fifty attempts, and small portions of the wings were repeat- edly broken off. He tried the same experiment in the open air, with a swallow and T. fimbria ; but the large size of this moth probably interfered with its capture. J We are thus reminded of a statement made by Mr. Wal- * See the interesting observations by Mr. T. W. Wood, " The Student," Sept., 1868, p. 81. f Mr. Wallace in " Hardwicke's Science Gossip, " Sept., 1867, p. 193. \ See also on this subject, Mr. Weir's paper in " Transact. Ent Soc,," 1869, p. 23. 356 THE DESCENT OF MAN. lace,* namely, that in the Brazilian forests and Malayan islands, many common and highly-decorated butterflies are weak flyers, though furnished with a broad expanse of wing; and they "are often captured with pierced and broken wings, as if they had been seized by birds, from which they had escaped; if the wings had been much smaller in proportion to the body, it seems probable that the insect would more frequently have been struck or pierced in a vital part, and thus the increased expanse of the wings may have been indirectly beneficial. " Display. The bright colors of many butterflies and of some moths are specially arranged for display, so that they may be readily seen. During the night colors are not vis- ible, and there can be no doubt that the nocturnal moths, taken as a body, are much less gayly decorated than butter- flies, all of which are diurnal in their habits. But the moths of certain families, such as the Zygaenidse, several Sphingidge, Uraniidae, some Arctiidae and Saturniidse, fly about during the day or early evening, and many of these are extremely beautiful, being far brighter-colored than the strictly nocturnal kinds. A few exceptional cases, how- ever, of bright - colored nocturnal species have been recorded. f There is evidence of another kind in regard to display. Butterflies, as before remarked, elevate their wings when at rest, but while basking in the sunshine often alternately raise and depress them, thus exposing both surfaces to full view; and although the lower surface is often colored in an obscure manner as a protection, yet in many species it is as highly decorated as the upper surface, and sometimes in a very different manner. In some tropical species the lower surface is even more brilliantly colored than the upper. J In the English fritillaries (Argynnis) the lower surface *" Westminster Review," July, 1867, p. 16. f For instance, Lithosia; but Prof. Westwood ("Modern Class, of Insects," vol. ii, p. 390) seems surprised at this case. On the relative colors of diurnal and nocturnal Lepidoptera, see ibid., pp. 333, 392; also Harris, "Treatise on the Insects of New England," 1842, p. 315. \ Such differences between the upper and lower surfaces of the wings of several species of Papiliomay be seen in the beautiful plates to Mr. Wallace's "Memoir on the Papilionidae of the Malayan Begion," in "Transact. Linn. Soc.," vol. xxv, part i, 1865. INSECTS. 35? alone is ornamented with shining silver. Nevertheless, as a general rule, the upper surface, which is probably more fully exposed, is colored more brightly and diversely than the lower. Hence the lower surface generally affords to entomologists the more useful character for detecting the affinities of the various species. Fritz Miiller informs me that three species of Castnia are found near his house in S. Brazil; of two of them the hind wings are obscure, and are always covered by the front wings when these butter- flies are at rest; but the third species has black hind wings, beautifully spotted with red and white, and these are fully expanded and displayed whenever the butterfly rests. Other such cases could be added. If we now turn to the enormous group of moths which, as I hear from Mr. Stainton, do not habitually expose the under surface of their wings to full view, we find this side very rarely colored with a brightness greater than, or even equal to, that of the upper side. Some exceptions to the rule, either real or apparent, must be noticed, as the case of Hypopyra.* Mr. Trimen informs me that in Guenee's great work three moths are figured, in which the under sur- face is much the more brilliant. For instance, in the Aus- tralian Gastrophora the upper surface of the fore wing is pale grayish-ochreous, while the lower surface is magnifi- cently ornamented by an ocellus of cobalt-blue, placed in the midst of a black mark, surrounded by orange-yellow, and this by bluish-white. But the habits of these three moths are unknown; so that no explanation can be given of their unusual style of coloring. Mr. Trimen also informs me that the lower surface of the wings in certain other Geometrae f and quadrifid Noctuae are either more variegated or more brightly-colored than the upper surface; but some of these species have the habit of "holding their wings quite erect over their backs, retaining them in this position for a considerable time/' and thus exposing the under surface to view. Other species, when settled on the ground or herbage, now and then suddenly and slightly lift *See Mr. Wormald on this moth; " Proc. Ent. Soc.," March 2, 1868. f Se also an account of the South American genus Erateina (one of the Geometrae) in "Transact. Ent. Soc.." new series, vol. v, pis xv and xvi. 358 THE DESCENT OF MAN. up their wings. Hence the lower surface of the wings being brighter than the upper surface in certain moths is not so anomalotis as it at first appears. The Saturniidaj include some of the most beautiful of all moths., their wings being decorated, as in our British Emperor moth, with fine ocelli; and Mr. T. W. Wood * observes that they resemble butterflies in some of their movements; "for instance, in the gentle waving up and down of the wings as if for dis- play, which is more characteristic of diurnal than of nocturnal Lepidoptera." It is a singlar fact that no British moths which are brilliantly colored, and, as far as I can discover, hardly any foreign species, differ much in color according to sex; though this is the case with many brilliant butterflies. The male, however, of one American moth, the Saturnia lo, is described as having its fore wings deep yellow, curiously marked Avith purplish-red spots; while the wings of the female are purple-brown, marked with gray lines, f The British moths which differ sexually in color are all brown, or of various dull yellow tints, or nearly white. In several species the males are much darker than the females, J and these belong to groups which generally fly about during the afternoon. On the other hand, in many genera, as Mr. Stainton informs me, the males have the hind wings whiter than those of the female of which fact Agrotis exclamationis offers a good instance. In the Ghost Moth (Hepialus humuli) the difference is more strongly marked; the males being white and the females yellow *"Proc. Ent. Soc. of London," July 6, 1868, p. 27. f Harris, "Treatise," etc., edited by Flint, 1862, p 395. J For instance, I observe in my son's cabinet that the males are darker than the females in the Lnsiocampa qutrcus, Odonestis pota- toria, Hypogymna dispar, Dasychira pudtbunda and Cycnia mendica. In this latter species the difference in color between the two sexes is strongly marked; and Mr. Wallace informs me that we here have, as lie believes, an instance of protective mimicry confined to one sex, as will hereafter be more fully explained. The white female of the Cycnia resembles the very common Spttosoma mentkrasti, both sexes of which are white; and Mr. Stainton observed that this latter moth was rejected with utter disgust by a whole brood of young turkeys, which were fond of eating other moths; so that if the Cycnia was commonly mistaken by British birds for the Spilosoma, it would es- cape being devoured, and its white, deceptive color would thus be highly beneficial. INSECTS. 359 with darker markings.* It is probable that in these cases the males are thus rendered more conspicuous, and more easily seen by the females while flying about in the dusk. From the several foregoing facts it is impossible to admit that the brilliant colors of butterflies, and of some few moths, have commonly been acquired for the sake of pro- tection. We have seen that their colors and elegant pat- . terns are arranged and exhibited as if for display. Hence I am led to believe that the females prefer or are most excited by the more brilliant males; for on any other sup- position the males would, as far as we can see, be orna- mented to no purpose. We know that ants and certain Lamellicorn beetles are capable of feeling an attachment for each other, and that ants recognize their fellows after an interval of several months. Heuce there is no abstract improbability in the Lepidoptera, which probably stand nearly or quite as high in the scale as these insects, having sufficient mental capacity to admire bright colors. They certainly discover flowers by color. The humming-bird sphinx may often be seen to swoop down from a distance on a bunch of flowers in the midst of green foliage; and I have been assured by two persons abroad that these moths repeatedly visit flowers painted on the walls of a room and vainly endeavor to insert their proboscis into them. Fritz Miiller informs me that several kinds of butterflies in S. Brazil show an unmistakable preference for certain colors over others. He observed that they very often visited the brilliant red flowers of five or six genera of plants, but never the white or yellow flowering species of the same and other genera growing in the same garden; and I have received other accounts to the same effect. As I hear from Mr. Doubleday, the common white butterfly often flies down to a bit of paper on the ground, no doubt mistaking it for one of its own species. Mr. Collingwoodf * It is remarkable that in the Shetland Islands the male of this moth, instead of differing widely from the female, frequently resem- bles her closely in color (see Mr. MacLachlan, " Transact. Ent. Soc.," vol. ii, 1866, p. 459). Mr. G. Fraser suggests ("Nature," April, 1871, p. 489) that at the season of the year when the ghost-moth ap- pears in these northern islands, the whiteness of the males would not be needed to render them visible to the females in the twilight night. f " Rambles of a Naturalist in the Chinese Seas," 1868, p. 183. 360 THE DESCENT OF MAN. in speaking of the difficulty in collecting certain butter- flies in the Malay Archipelago, states that "a dead speci- men pinned upon a conspicuous twig will often arrest an insect of the same species in its headlong flight and bring it down within easy reach of the net, especially if it be of the opposite sex." The courtship of butterflies is, as before remarked, a prolonged affair. The males sometimes fight together in rivalry; and many may be seen pursuing or crowding round the same female. Unless, then, the females prefer one male to another the pairing must be left to mere chance, and this does not appear probable. If, on the other hand, the females habitually, or even occasionally, prefer the more beautiful males, the colors of the latter will have been rendered brighter by degrees, and will have been trans- mitted to both sexes or to one sex, according to the law of inheritance which has prevailed. The process of sexual selection will have been much facilitated, if the conclusion can be trusted, arrived at from various kinds of evidence in the supplement to the ninth chapter; namely, that the males of many Lepidoptera, at least in the imago state, greatly exceed the females in number. Some facts, however, are opposed to the belief that female butterflies prefer the more beautiful males; thus, as I have been assured by several collectors, fresh females may fre- quently be seen paired with battered, faded, or dingy males; but this is a circumstance which could hardly fail often to follow from the males emerging from their cocoons earlier than the females. With moths of the family of the Bom- bycidae, the sexes pair immediately after assuming the imago state; for they cannot feed, owing to the rudiment- ary condition of their mouths. The females, as several entomologists have remarked to me, lie in an almost torpid state, and appear not to wince the least choice in regard to their partners. This is the case with the common silk-moth (B. mori), as I have been told by some continental and English breeders. Dr. Wallace, who has had great experi- ence in breeding Bonibyx cyntliia, is convinced that the females evince no choice or preference. He has kept above three hundred of these moths together, and has often found the most vigorous females mated with stunted males. The reverse appears to occur seldom; for, as he believes, the more vigorous males pass over the weakly females, and are INSECTS. 361 attracted by those endowed with most vitality. Never- theless, the Bombycidse, though obscurely colored, are often beautiful to our eyes from their elegant and mottled shades. I have as yet only referred to the species in which the males are brighter colored than the females, and I have attributed their beauty to the females for many generations having chosen and paired with the more attractive males. But converse cases occur, though rarely, in which the females are more brilliant than the males; and here, as I believe, the males have selected the more beautiful females, and have thus slowly added to their beauty. We do not know why in various classes of animals the males of some few species have selected the more beautiful females instead of having gladly accepted any female, as seems to be the general rule in the animal kingdom; but if, contrary to what generally occurs with the Lepidoptera, the females were much more numerous than the males, the latter would be likely to pick out the more beautiful females. Mr. But- ler showed me several species of Callidryas in the British Museum, in some of which the females equaled, and in others greatly surpassed, the males in beauty ; for the females alone have the borders of their wings suffused with crimson and orange and spotted with black. The plainer males of these species closely resemble each other, showing that here the females have been modified; whereas in those cases, where the males are the more ornate, it is these which have been modified, the females remaining closely alike. In England we have some analogous cases, though not so marked. The females alone of two species of Thecla have a bright purple or orange patch on their fore wings. In Hipparchia the sexes do not differ much ; but it is the female of H. janira which has a conspicuous light brown patch on her wings; and the females of some of the other species are brighter colored than their males. Again, the females of Colias edusa and Jiyale have "orange or yellow spots on the black marginal border, represented in the males only by thin streaks;" and in Pieris it is the females ,which "are ornamented with black spots on the fo're wings, and these are only partially present in the males." Now the males of many butterflies are known to support the females during their marriage flight; but in the species just named it is the females which support the 362 THE DESCENT OF MAN. males; so that the part which the two sexes play is reversed, as is their relative beauty. Throughout the animal king- dom the males commonly take the more active share in wooing, and their beauty seems to have been increased by the females having accepted the more attractive individuals; but with these butterflies the females take the more active part in the final marriage ceremony, so that we may sup- pose that they likewise do so in the wooing; and in this case we can understand how it is that they have been rendered the more beautiful. Mr. Meldola, from whom the fore- going statements have been taken, says in conclusion: " Though I am not convinced of the action of sexual selec- tion in producing the colors of insects, it cannot be denied that these facts are strikingly corroborative of Mr. Darwin's views. * As sexual selection primarily depends on variability, a few words must be added on this subject. In respect to color there is no difficulty, for any number of highly variable Lepidoptera could be named. One good instance will suffice. Mr. Bates showed me a whole series of specimens of Papilio sesostris and P. childrence; in the latter the males varied much in the extent of the beautifully enameled green patch on the fore wings, and in the size of the white mark, and of the splendid crimson stripe on the hind wings; so that there was a great contrast among the males between the most and the least gaudy. The male of Papilio sesostris is much less beautiful than of P. childrence; and it like- wise varies a little in the size of the green patch on the fore wings, and in the occasional appearance of the small crimson stripe on the hind wings, borrowed, as it would .seem, from its own female; for the females of this and of many other species in the JEneas group possess this crimson stripe. Hence between the brightest specimens of P. ses- ostris and the dullest of P. childrencB there was but a small interval; and it was evident that as far as mere variability is concerned, there would be no difficulty in permanently increasing the beauty of either species by means of selec- tion. The variability is here almost confined to the male * "Nature," April 27, 1871, p. 508. Mr. Meldola quotes Donzel, in "Soc. Ent. de France," 1837, p. 77, on the flight of butterflies while pairing. See also Mr. G. Eraser, in "Nature," April 20, 1871, p. 489, on the sexual differences of several British butterflies. INSECTS. 363 sex; but Mr. Wallace and Mr. Bates have shown * that the females of some species are extremely variable, the males being nearly constant. In a future chapter I shall have occasion to show that the beautiful eye-like spots, or ocelli, found on the wings of many Lepidoptera are eminently variable. I may here add that these ocelli offer a difficulty on the theory of sexual selection; for though appearing to us so ornamental, they are never present in one sex and absent in the other, nor do they ever differ much in the two sexes, f This fact is at present inexplicable; but if it should hereafter be found that the formation of an ocellus is due to some change in the tissues of the wings, for instance, occurring at a very early period of development, we might expect, from what we know of the laws of inherit- ance, that it would be transmitted to both sexes, though arising and perfected in one sex alone. On the whole, although many serious objections may be iirged, it seems probable that most of the brilliantly-colored species of Lepidoptera owe their colors to sexual selection, excepting in certain cases, presently to be mentioned, in which conspicuous colors have been gained through mimicry as a protection. From the ardor of the male throughout the animal kingdom he is generally willing to accept any female; and it is the female which usually exerts a choice. Hence, if sexual selection has been efficient with the Lepidoptera, the male, when the sexes differ, ought to be the more brilliantly colored, and this undoubtedly is the case. When both sexes are brilliantly colored and resemble each other the characters acquired by the males appear to have been transmitted to both. We are led to this conclu- sion by cases, even within the same genus, of gradation from an extraordinary amount of difference to identity in color between the two sexes. But it may be asked whether the differences in color between the sexes may not be accounted for by other means * Wallace on the Papilionidae of the Malayan Region, in "Trans- act. Linn. Soc.," vol. xxv, 1865, pp. 8, 36. A striking case of a rare variety, strictly intermediate between two other well-marked female varieties, is given by Mr. Wallace. See also Mr. Bates, in "Proc. Entomolog. Soc.,'.' Nov. 19, 1866, p. 40. f Mr. Bates was so kind as to lay this subject before the Entomo- logical Society, and I have received answers to this effect from several entomologists. 364 THE DESCENT OF MAN. "besides sexual selection. Thus the males and females of the same species of butterfly are in several cases known* to inhabit different stations,, the former commonly basking in the sunshine, the latter haunting gloomy forests. It is therefore possible that different conditions of life may have acted directly on the two sexes; but this is not probable, f as in the adult state they are exposed to different conditions during a very short period ; and the larvae of both are exposed to the same conditions. Mr. Wallace believes that the difference between the sexes is due not so much to the males having been modified, as to the females having in all or almost all cases acquired dull colors for the sake of protection. It seems to me, on the contrary, far more probable that it is the males which have been chiefly modified through sexual selection, the females having been comparatively little changed. We can thus under- stand how it is that the females of allied species generally resemble one another so much more closely than do the males. They thus show us approximately the primordial coloring of the parent-species of the group to which they belong. They have, however, almost always been somewhat modified by the transfer to them of some of the successive variations, through the accumulation of which the males were rendered beautiful. But I do not wish to deny that the females alone of some species may have been specially modified for protection. In most cases the males and females of distinct species Avill have been exposed during their prolonged larval state to different conditions, and may have been thus affected ; though with the males any slight change of color thus caused will generally have been masked by the brilliant tints gained through sexual selec- tion. When we treat of birds, I shall have to discuss the whole question, as to how far the differences in color between the sexes are due to the males having been modi- fied through sexual selection for ornamental purposes, or to the females having been modified through natural selec- tion for the sake of protection, so that I will here say but little on the subject. In all the cases in which the more common form of equal *H. W. Bates, "The Naturalist on the Amazons," vol. ii, 1863, p. 228. A. R. Wallace, in " Transact. Liun. Soc.," vol. xxv, 1865, p. 10. f On this whole subject see " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," 1868, vol. ii, chap, xxiii. INSECTS. 365 inheritance by both sexes has prevailed, the selection of bright-colored males would tend to make the females bright colored ; and the selection of dull-colored females would tend to make the males dull. If both processes were carried on simultaneously, they would tend to coun- teract each other ; and the final result would depend on whether a greater number of females from being well pro- tected by obscure colors, or a greater number of males by being brightly colored and thus finding partners, succeeded in leaving more numerous offspring. In order to account for the frequent transmission of char- acters to one sex alone, Mr. Wallace expresses his belief that the more common form of equal inheritance by both sexes can be changed through natural selection into inheritance by one sex alone, but in favor of this view I can discover no evidence. We know from what occurs under domestica- tion that new characters often appear, which from the first are transmitted to one sex alone ; and by the selection of such variations there would not be the slightest difficulty in giving bright colors to the males alone, and at the same time or subsequently, dull colors to the females alone. In this manner the females of some butterflies and moths have, it is probable, been rendered inconspicuous for the sake of protection, and widely different from their males. I am, however, unwilling without distinct evidence to admit that two complex processes of selection, each requir- ing the transference of new characters to one sex alone, have been carried on with a multitude of species that the males have been rendered more brilliant by beating their rivals, and the females more dull colored by having escaped from their enemies. The male, for instance, of the common brimstone butterfly (Gonepteryx), is of a far more intense yellow than the female, though she is equally conspicuous; and it does not seem probable that she specially acquired her pale tints as a protection, though it is probable that the male acquired his bright colors as a sexual attraction. The female of Anthocharis cardamines does not possess the beautiful orange wing-tips of the male ; consequently she closely resembles the white butterflies (Pieris) so com- mon in our gardens; but we have no evidence that this resemblance is beneficial to her. As, on the other hand, she resembles both sexes of several other species of the genus inhabiting various quarters of the world, it is probable that 366 THE DESCENT OF MAN. she has simply retained to a large extent her primordial colors. Finally, as we have seen, various considerations lead to the conclusion that with the greater number of brilliantly col- ored Lepidoptera it is the male which has been chiefly modified through sexual selection; the amount of difference between the sexes mostly depending on the form of inherit- ance which has prevailed. Inheritance is governed by so many unknown laws or conditions that it seems to us to act in a capricious manner;* and we can thus, to a certain ex- tent, understand how it is that with closely allied species the sexes either differ to an astonishing degree, or are iden- tical in color. As all the successive steps in the process of variation are necessarily transmitted through the female, a greater or less number of such steps might readily become developed in her; and thus we can understand the frequent gradations from an extreme difference to none at all between the sexes of allied species. These cases of gradation, it may be added, are much too common to favor the supposi- tion that we here see females actually undergoing tile process of transition and losing their brightness for the sake of protection; for we have every reason to conclude that at any one time the greater number of species are in a fixed condition. Mimicry. This principle was first made clear in an ad- mirable paper by Mr. Bates, f who thus threw a flood of light on many obscure problems. It had previously been observed that certain butterflies in South America belong- ing to quite distinct families resembled the Heliconidae so closely in every stripe and shade of color that they could not be distinguished save by an experienced entomologist. As the Heliconidas are colored in their usual manner, while the others depart from the usual coloring of the groups to which they belong, it is clear that the latter are the imi- tators, and the Helicpnidae the imitated. Mr. Bates further observed that the imitating species are comparatively rare, while the imitated abound, and that the two sets live min- gled together. From the fact of the Heliconidae being * " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," voL ii, chap, xii, p. 17. f "Transact. I4nn. Soc.," vol. xxiii, 1863, p. 495. INSECTS. 367 conspicuous and beautiful insects, yet so numerous in indi- viduals and species, he concluded that they must be pro- tected from the attacks of enemies by some secretion or odor; and this conclusion has now been amply confirmed,* especially by Mr. Belt. Hence Mr. Bates inferred that the butterflies which imitate the protected species have acquired their present marvelously deceptive appearance through variation and natural selection, in order to be mistaken for the protected kinds, and thus to escape being devoured. No explanation is here attempted of the brilliant colors of the imitated, but only of the imitating butterflies. "We must account for the colors of the former in the same gen- eral manner as in the cases previously discussed in this chapter. Since the publication of Mr. Bates' paper similar and equally striking facts have been observed by Mr. Wal- lace in the Malayan region, by Mr. Trimen in S. Africa, and by Mr. Eiley in the United States, f As some writers have felt much difficulty in understand- ing how the first steps in the process of mimicry could have been effected through natural selection, it may be well to remark that the process probably commenced long ago between forms not widely dissimilar in color. In this case even a slight variation would be beneficial if it rendered the one species more like the other; and afterward the imitated species might be modified to an extreme degree through sexual selection or other means, and if the changes were gradual the imitators might easily be led along the same track, until they differed to an equally extreme degree from their original condition; and they would thus ulti- mately assume an appearance or coloring wholly unlike that of the other members of the group to which they belonged. It should also be remembered that many species of Lepidoptera are liable to considerable and abrupt varia- tions in color. A few instances have been given in this chapter; and many more may be found in the papers of Mr. Bates and Mr. Wallace. *"Proc. Ent. Soc.," Dec. 3, 1866, p. 45. ,f Wallace, "Transact. Linn. Soc.," vol. xxv, 1865, p. 1 ; also ''Transact. Ent. Soc.," vol. iv (3d series), 1867, p. 301. Trimen, "Linn. Transact.," vol. xxvi, 1869, p. 497. Riley, "Third Annual Report on the Noxious Insects of Missouri," 1871, pp. 163-168. This latter essay is valuable, as Mr. Riley here discusses all the objections which have been raised against Mr. Bates' theory. 368 THE DESCENT OF MAN. With several species the sexes are alike, and imitate the two sexes of another species. But Mr. Trimen gives, in the paper already referred to, three cases in which the sexes of the imitated form differ from each other in color, and the sexes of the imitating form differ in a like manner. Several cases have also been recorded where the females alone imitate brilliantly-colored and protected species, the males retaining " the normal aspect of their immediate con- geners." It is here obvious that the successive variations by which the female has been modified have been trans- mitted to her alone. It is, however, probable that some of the many successive variations would have been transmitted to, and developed in, the males had not such males been eliminated by being thus rendered less attractive to the females; so that only those variations were preserved which were from the first strictly limited in their transmission to the female sex. We have a partial illustration of these remarks in a statement by Mr. Belt; * that the males of some of the Leptalides, which imitate protected species, still retain in a concealed manner some of their original characters. Thus in the males " the upper half of the lower wing is of a pure white, while all the rest of the wings is barred and spotted with black, red and yellow, like the species they mimic. The females have not this white patch, and the males usually conceal it by covering it with the upper wing, so that I cannot imagine its being of any other use to them than as an attraction in courtship, when they exhibit it to the females, and thus gratify their deep- seated preference for the normal color of the order to which the Leptalides belong." Bright Colors of Caterpillars. While reflecting on the beauty of many butterflies it occurred to me that some caterpillars were splendidly colored; and as sexual selection could not possibly have here acted, it appeared rash to attribute the beauty of the mature insect to this agency, unless the bright colors of their larva? could be somehow explained. In the first place, it may be observed that the colors of caterpillars do not stand in any close correlation with those of the mature insect. Secondly, their bright colors do not serve in any ordinary manner as a protection. * " The Naturalist in Nicaragua," 1874, p. 385. INSECTS, 369 Mr. Bates informs me, as an instance of this, that the most conspicuous caterpillar which he ever beheld (that of a Sphinx) lived on the large green leaves of a tree on the open llanos of South America; it was about four inches in length, transversely banded with black and yellow, and with its head, legs and tail of a bright red. Hence it caught the eye of any one who passed by, even at the distance of many yards, and no doubt that of every passing bird. I then applied to Mr. Wallace, who has an innate genius for solving difficulties. After some consideration he replied: " Most caterpillars require protection, as may be inferred from some kinds being furnished with spines or irritating hairs and from many being colored green like the leaves on which they feed, or being curiously like the twigs of the trees on which they live." Another instance of protection, fur- nished me by Mr. J. Mansel Weale, may be added, namely, that there is a caterpillar of a moth which lives on the mimosas in S. Africa, and fabricates for itself a case quite indistinguishable from the surrounding thorns. From such considerations Mr. Wallace thought it probable that conspicuously colored caterpillars were protected by having u nauseous taste; but as their skin is extremely tender, and as their intestines readily protrude from a wound, a slight peck from the beak of a bird would be as fatal to them as if they had been devoured. Hence, as Mr. Wal- lace remarks, " distastefulness alone would be insufficient to protect a caterpillar unless some outward sign indicated to its would-be destroyer that its prey was a disgusting morsel." Under these circumstances it would be highly advantageous to a caterpillar to be instantaneously and certainly recognized as unpalatable by all birds and other animals. Thus the most gaudy colors would be service- able, and might have been gained by variation and the survival of the most easily recognized individuals. This hypothesis appears at first sight very bold, but when it was brought before the Entomological Society* it was supported by various statements; and Mr. J. Jenner Weir, who keeps a large number of birds in an aviary, informs me that he has made many trials and finds no * " Proc. Entoinolog. Soc.," Dec. 3, 1866, p. 45, and March 4. 1867, p. 80. 370 THE DESCENT OF MAN. exception to the rule that all caterpillars of nocturnal and retiring habits with smooth skins, all of a green color and all which imitate twigs are greedily devoured by his birds. The hairy and spiiiose kinds are invariably rejected, as were four conspicuously colored species. When the birds rejected a caterpiller they plainly showed by shaking their heads and cleansing their beaks that they were disgusted by the taste.* Three conspicuous kinds of caterpillars and moths were also given to some lizards and frogs by Mr. A. Butler and were rejected, though other kinds were eagerly eaten. Thus the probability of Mr. Wallace's view is con- firmed, namely, that certain caterpillars have been made conspicuous for their own good, so as to be easily recog- nized by their enemies, on nearly the same principle that poisons are sold in colored bottles by druggists for the good of man. We cannot, however, at present thus explain the elegant diversity in the colors of many caterpillars; but any species which had at some former period acquired a dull, mottled or striped appearance, either in imitation of surrounding objects or from the direct action of climate, etc., almost certainly would not become uniform in color when its tints were rendered intense and bright; for in order to make a caterpillar merely conspicuous there would be no selection in any definite direction. Summary and Concluding Remarks on Insects. Looking back to the several orders we see that the sexes often differ in various characters, the meaning of which is not in the least understood. The sexes, also, often differ in their organs of sense and means of locomotion, so that the males may quickly discover and reach the females. They differ still oftener in the males possessing diversified contrivances for retaining the females when found. We are, however, here concerned only in a secondary degree with sexual dif- ferences of these kinds. In almost all the orders the males of some species, even of weak and delicate kinds, are known to be highly pug- *See Mr. J. Jenner Weir's paper on Insects and Insectivorous Birds, in "Transact. Ent. Soc.," 1869, p. 21; also Mr. Butler's paper, ibid., p. 27. Mr. Riley has given analogous facts in the "Third Annual Report on the Noxious Insects of Missouri," 1871, p. 148. Some opposed cases are, however, given by Dr. Wallace and M. H. d'Orville; see " Zoological Record," 1869, p. 349. INSECTS. 371 nacious; and some few are furnished with special weapons for fighting with their rivals. But the law of battle does not prevail nearly so widely with insects as with the higher animals. Hence it probably arises that it is in only a few cases that the males have been rendered larger and stronger than the females. On the contrary, they are usually smaller, so that they may be developed within a shorter time, to be ready in large numbers for the emerg- ence of the females. In two families of the Homoptera and in three of the Orthoptera, the males alone possess sound-producing organs in an efficient state. These are used incessantly during the breeding-season, not only for calling the females, but ap- parently for charming or exciting them in rivalry with other males. Xo one who admits the agency of selection of any kind, will, after reading the above discussion, dis- pute that these musical instruments have been acquired through sexual selection. In four other orders the mem- bers of one sex, or more commonly of both sexes, are pro- vided with organs for producing various sounds, which ap- parently serve merely as call-notes. When both sexes are thus provided the individuals which were able to make the loudest or most continuous noise would gain partners before those 'which were less noisy, so that their organs have proba- bly been gained through sexual selection. It is instructive to reflect on the wonderful diversity of the means for pro- ducing sound possessed by the males alone, or by both sexes in no less than six orders. We thus learn how effectual sexual selection has been in leading to modifications which sometimes, as with the Homoptera, relate to important parts of the organization. From the reasons assigned in the last chapter, it is proba- ble that the great horns possessed by the. males of many Lamellicorn, and some other beetles, have been acquired as ornaments. From the small size of insects we are apt to undervalue their appearance. If we could imagine a male Chalcosoma (see fig. 16), with its polished bronzed coat of mail and its vast complex horns, magnified to the size of a horse, or, even of a dog, it would be one of the most impos- ing animals in the world. The coloring of insects is a complex and obscure subject. When the male differs slightly from th$ female, and neither are brilliantly colored, it is probable that the sexes 372 THE DESCENT OF MAN. have varied in a slightly different manner, and that the variations have been transmitted by each sex to the same, without any benefit or evil thus accruing. When the male is brilliantly colored and differs conspicuously from the female, as with some dragon-flies and many butterflies, it is probable that he owes his colors to sexual selection , while the female has retained a primordial or very ancient type of coloring, slightly modified by the agencies before explained. But in some cases the female has apparently been made obscure by variations transmitted to her alone, as a means of direct protection; and it is almost certain that she has sometimes been made brilliant, so as to imitate other protected species inhabiting the same district. When the sexes resemble each other and both are obscurely colored there is no doubt that they have been in a multitude of cases so colored for the sake of protection. So it is in some instances when both are brightly colored, for they thus imi- tate protected species, or resemble surrounding objects such as flowers; or they give notice to their enemies that they are unpalatable. In other cases in which the sexes resem- ble each other and are both brilliant, especially when the colors are arranged for display, we may conclude that they have been gained by the male sex as an attraction, and have been transferred to the female. We are more especially led to this conclusion whenever the same type of coloration pre- vails throughout a whole group, and we find that the males of some species differ widely in color from the females, while others differ slightly or not at all with intermediate gradations connecting these extreme states. In the same manner as bright colors have often been par- tially transferred from the males to the females, so it has been with the extraordinary horns of many Lamellicorn and some other beetles. So, again, the sound-producing organs proper to the males of the Homoptera and Orthop- tera have generally been transferred in a rudimentary, or even in a nearly perfect condition, to the females ; yet not sufficiently perfect to be of any use. It is also an interest- ing fact, as bearing on sexual selection, that the stridu- lating organs of certain male Orthoptera are not fully developed until the last moult; and that the colors of cer- tain male dragon-flies are not fully developed until some little time after their emergence from the pupal state, and when they are ready to breed. INSECTS. 373 Sexual selection implies that the more attractive indi- viduals are preferred by the opposite sex ; and as with injects, when the sexes differ, it is the male which, with some rare exceptions, is the more ornamented, and departs more from the type to which the species belongs; and as it is the male which searches eagerly for the female, we must suppose that the females habitually or occasionally prefer the more beautiful males, and that these have thus acquired their beauty. That the females in most or all the orders would have the power of rejecting any particular male, is probable from the many singular contrivances possessed by the males, such as great jaws, adhesive cushions, spines, elongated legs, etc., for seizing the female; for these con- trivances show that there is some difficulty in the act, so that her concurrence would seem necessary. Judging from what we know of the perceptive powers and affections of various insects, there is no antecedent improbability in sexual selection having come largely into play; but we have as yet no direct evidence on this head, and some facts are opposed to the belief. Nevertheless, when we see many males pursuing the same female, we can hardly believe that the pairing is left to blind chance that the female exerts no choice, and is not influenced by the gorgeous colors or other ornaments with which the male is decorated. If we admit that the females of the Homoptera and Orthoptera appreciate the musical tones of their male part- ners, and that the various instruments have been perfected through sexual selection, there is little improbability in the females of other insects appreciating beauty in form or color, and consequently in such characters having been thus gained by the males. But from the circumstance of color being so variable, and from its having been so ol ten modified for the sake of protection, it is difficult to decide in how large a proportion of cases sexual selection has played a part. This is more especially difficult in those orders, such as Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera, in which the two sexes rarely differ much in color; for we are then left to mere analogy. With the Coleoptera, how- ever, as .before remarked, it- is in the great Lamellicorn group, placed by some authors at the head of the order, and in which we sometimes see a mutual attachment be- tween the sexes, that we find the males of some species pos- sessing weapons for sexual strife, others furnished with 374 THE DESCENT OF MAN. wonderful horns, many with stridulating organs, and others ornamented with splendid metallic tints. Hence it seems probable that all these characters have been gained through the same means, namely, sexual selection. With butterflies we have the best evidence, as the males sometimes take pains to display their beautiful colors; and we cannot be- lieve that they would act thus, unless the display was of use to them in their courtship. When we treat of birds we shall see that they present in their secondary sexual characters the closest analogy with insects. Thus many male birds are highly pugnacious, and some are furnished with special weapons for fighting with their rivals. They possess organs which are used during the breeding-season for producing vocal and instrumental music. They are frequently ornamented with combs, horns, wattles and plumes of the most diversified kinds, and are decorated with beautiful colors, all evidently for the sake of display. We shall find that, as with insects, both sexes in certain groups are equally beautiful, and are equally provided with ornaments which are usually confined to the male sex. In other groups both sexes are equally plain-colored and unornamented. Lastly, in some few anomalous cases the females are more beautiful than the males. We shall often find, in the same group of birds, every gradation from no difference between the sexes to an extreme difference. We shall see that female birds, like female insects, often possess more or less plain traces or rudiments of characters which properly belong to the males and are of use only to them. The analogy, indeed, in all these respects between birds and insects is curiously close. Whatever explanation applies to the one class probably applies to the other; and this explanation, as we shall here- after attempt to show in further detail, is sexual selection. FISHES. 375 CHAPTER XII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF FISHES, AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES. FISHES: Courtship and battles of the males Larger size of the females Males, bright colors and ornamental appendages ; other strange characters Colors and appendages acquired by the males during the breeding-season alone Fishes with both sexes brilliantly colored Protective colors The less conspicu- ous colors of the female cannot be accounted for on the principle of protection Male fishes building nests and taking charge of the ova and young. AMPHIBIANS: Differences in structure and color between the sexes Vocal organs. REPTILES : Chelonians Crocodiles Snakes, colors in some cases protective Lizards, battles of Ornamental appendages Strange differences in structure between the sexes Colors Sexual differences almost as great as with birds. WE have now arrived at the great sub-kingdom of the Vertebrata, and will commence with the lowest class, that of fishes. The males of Plagiostomous fishes (sharks, rays) and of Chimseroid fishes are provided with claspers which serve to retain the female, like the various structures possessed by many of the lower animals. Besides the claspers, the males of many rays have clusters of strong sharp spines on their heads and several rows along "the upper outer surface of their pectoral fins." These are present in the males of some species, which have other parts of their bodies smooth. They are only temporarily developed during the breeding-season ; and Dr. Giinther suspects that they are brought into action as prehensile organs by the doubling inward and downward of the two sides of the body. It is a remarkable fact that the females and not the males of some species, as of Raia davata, have their backs studded with large hook -formed spines. * The males alone of the capelin (Mallotus villosus, one of *Yarrell's "Hist, of British Fishes," vol. ii, 1836, pp. 417, 425, 436. Dr. Giinther informs me that the spines in fi. clavata are peculiar to the female. 376 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Salmonidae) are provided with a ridge of closely-set, brush- like scales, by the aid of which two males, one on each side, hold the female, while she runs with great swiftness on the sandy beach and there deposits her spawn.* The widely distinct Monacantlms scopas presents a somewhat analogous structure. The male, as Dr. Giinther informs me, has a cluster of stiff, straight spines, like those of a * comb, on the sides of the tail ; and these in a specimen six inches long were nearly one and a half inches in length; the female has in the same place a cluster of bristles, which may be compared with those of a toothbrush. In another species, M. peronii, the male has a brush like that possessed by the female of the last species, while the sides of the tail in the female are smooth. In some other species of the same genus the tail can be perceived to be a little roughened in the male and perfectly smooth in the female; and lastly in others, both sexes have smooth The males of many fish fight for the possession of the females. Thus the male stickleback ( Gasterosteus leiurus) has been described as " mad with delight " when the female comes out of her hiding-place and surveys the nest which he has made for her. " He darts round her in every direc- tion, then to his accumulated materials for the nest, then back again in an instant; and as she does not advance he endeavors to push her with his snout, and then tries to pull her by the tail and side-spine to the nest."f The males are said to be polygamists; J they are extraordinarily bold and pugnacious, while "the females are quite pacific." Their battles are at times desperate; "for these puny combatants fasten tight on each other for several seconds, tumbling over and over again, until their strength appears completely exhausted." With the rough-tailed stickleback (G. trachu- rus) the males while fighting swim round and round each other, biting and endeavoring to pierce each other with their raised lateral spines. The same writer adds, "the bite of these little furies is very severe. They also use their *"The American Naturalist," April, 1871, p. 119. f See Mr. R. Warington's interesting articles in " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," Oct., 1852, and Nov., 1855. J Noel Humphreys, "River Gardens," 1857. Loudon's " Mag. of Nat. History," vol. iii, 1880, p. 381. FISHES. 377 lateral spines with such fatal effect that I have seen one during a battle absolutely rip his opponent quite open, so that he sank to the bottom and died." When a fish is con- quered, "his gallant bearing forsakes him; his gay colors fade away; and he hides his disgrace among his peaceable companions, but is for some time the constant object of his conqueror's persecution." The male salmon is as pugnacious as the little stickle- back; and so is the male trout, as I hear from Dr. Giinther. Mr. Shaw saw a violent contest between two male salmon which lasted the whole day; and Mr. R. Buist, Superin- tendent of Fisheries, informs me that he has often watched from the bridge at Perth the males driving away their rivals whib the females were spawning. The males "are constantly fighting and tearing each other on the spawning- beds, and many so injure each other as to cause the death of numbers, many being seen swimming near the banks of the river in a state of exhaustion, and apparently in a dying state." * Mr. Buist informs me that in June, 1868, the keeper of the Stormontfield Breeding-Ponds visited the northern Tyne and found about 300 dead salmon, all of which with one exception were males; and he was convinced that they had lost their lives by fighting. The most curious point about the male salmon is that during the breeding-season, besides a light change in color, "the lower jaw elongates, and a cartilaginous pro- jection turns upwarl from the point, which, when the jaws are closed, occupies a deep cavity between the inter- maxillary bones of the upper jaw."f (Figs. 27 and 28.) In our salmon this change of structure lasts only during the breeding-season; but in the Salmo lycaodon of North- western America the change, as Mr. J. K. Lord J believes, is permanent and best marked in the older males which have previously ascended the rivers. In these old males the jaw becomes developed into an immense hook-like projec- tion and the teeth grow into regular fangs, often more than *"The Field," June 29, 1867. For Mr. Shaw's statement, see " Edinburgh Review," 1843. Another experienced observer (Scrope's "Days of -Salmon Fishing," p. 60) remarks that like the stag, the male would, if he could, keep all other males away. f Yarrell, "History of British Fishes," vol. ii, 1836, p. 10. % " The Naturalist in Vancouver's Island," vol. i, 1866, p. 54 378 THE DESCENT OF JUAN. half an inch in length. With the European salmon, according to Mr. Lloyd,* the temporary hook -like structure Kg. iff. Head of male common salmon (Salmo solar) during the breedlng- [Thls drawing, as well as all the others in the present chapter, have been exe- cuted by the well-known artist, Mr. G. Ford, from specimens in the British Museum, under the kind superintendence of Dr. Qunther.] to strengthen and protect the jaws, when one male charges another with wonderful violence; but the greatly developed teeth of the male American salmon may be com- "Scandinavian Adventures," vol. i, 1854, pp. 100, 104 FISHES. 379 pared with the tusks of many male mammals, and they indicate an offensive rather than a protective purpose. The salmon is not the only fish in which the teeth differ in the two sexes; as this is the case with many rays. In Fig. 2a Head of female salmon. the thornback (Raia Clavatd) the adult male has sharp, pointed teeth, directed backward, while those of the female are' broad" and flat, and form a pavement; so that these teeth differ in the two sexes of the same species more than is usual in distinct genera of the same family. The teeth of the male become sharp only when he is adult; while young they are broad and flat like those of the female. A9 380 THE DESCENT OF MAN. so frequently occurs with secondary sexual characters, both sexes of some species of rays (for instance R. batis), when adult, possess sharp, pointed teeth; and here a character, proper to and primarily gained by the male, appears to have been transmitted to the offspring of both sexes. The teeth are likewise pointed in both sexes of R. maculata, but only when quite adult; the males acquiring them at an earlier age than the females. We shall hereafter meet with anal- ogous cases in certain birds, in which the male acquires the plumage common to both sexes when adult, at a somewhat earlier age than does the female. With other species of rays the males even when old never possess sharp teeth, and consequently the adults of both sexes are provided with broad, flat teeth like those of the young, and like those of the mature females of the above-mentioned species.* As the rays are bold, strong and voracious fish, we may suspect that the males require their sharp teeth for fighting with their rivals; but as they possess many parts modified and adapted for the prehension of the female, it is possible that their teeth may be used for this purpose. In regard to size, M. Car onnierf maintains that the female of almost all fishes is larger than the male; and Dr. Giinther does not know of a single instance in which the male is actually larger than the female. With some Cyprinodonts the male is not even half as large. As in many kinds of fishes the males habitually fight together, it is surprising that they have not generally become larger and stronger "than the females through the effects of sexual selection. The males suffer from their small size, for, according to M. Carbonnier, they are liable to be devoured by the females of their own species when carnivorous, and no doubt by other species. Increased size must be in some manner of more importance to the females than strength and size are to the males for fighting with other males; and this perhaps is to allow of the production of a vast number of ova. In many species the male alone is ornamented with bright colors; or these are much brighter in the male than the female. The male, also, is sometimes provided with * See Tarrell's account of the rays in his " Hist, of British Fishes,'* rol, ii, 1836, p. 416, with an excellent figure, a.p.c( pp. 4^2, 43$, f As quoted in " The Farmer," 18R, p. 8ft& FISHES. 381 appendages which appear to be of no more use to him for the ordinary purposes of life than are the tail feathers to the peacock. I am indebted for most of the following facts to the kindness of Dr. Giinther. There is reason to suspect that many tropical fishes differ sexually in color and structure; and there are some striking cases with our British fishes. The male Callionymus lyra has been called the gemmeous dragonet " from its brilliant gem-like colors." Fig. 29. Callionymus lyra Upper figure, male ; lower figure, female. N. B. The lower figure is more reduced than the upper. When fresh caught from the sea the body is yellow of various shades, striped and spotted with vivid blue on the head; the dorsel fins are pale brown with dark longitudinal bands; the ventral, caudal and anal fins being bluish-black. The female, or sordid dragonet, was considered by Lin- naeus and by many subsequent naturalists as a distinct species; it is of a dingy reddish-brown with the dorsal fin brown and the other fins white. The sexes differ also in the proportional size of the head and mouth and in the position of the eyes;* but the most striking difference is the extraordinary elongation in the male (fig. 29) of the *I have drawn up this description from Yarrell's "British Fishes," vol. i, 1836, pp. 261, 266. 382 THE DESCENT OF MAN. dorsal fin. Mr. W. Saville Kent remarks that this ' ' sin- gular appendage appears from my observations of the species in confinement to be subservient to the same end as the wattles, crests and other abnormal adjuncts of the male in gallinaceous birds for the purpose of fascinating their mates."* The young males resemble the adult females in structure and color. Throughout the genus Callionymusf the male is generally much more brightly spotted than the female, and in several species, not only the dorsal, but the anal fin is much elongated in the males. The male of the Coitus scorpius, or sea-scorpion, is slenderer and smaller than the female. There is also a great difference in color between them. It is difficult, as Mr. LloydJ remarks, " for any one who has not seen this fish during the spawning season when its hues are brighest to conceive the admixture of brilliant colors with which it, in other respects so ill-favored, is at that time adorned." Both sexes of the Labrus mixtus, although very different in color, are beautiful; the male being orange with bright blue stripes and the female bright red with some black spots on the back. In the very distinct family of the Cyprinodontidae inhabitants of the fresh waters of foreign lands the sexes sometimes differ much in various characters. In the male of the Mollienesia petenensis,% the dorsal fin is greatly de- veloped and is marked with a row of large, round, ocellated, bright-colored spots; while the same fin in the female is smaller, of a different shape, and marked only with irregu- larly curved brown spots. In the male the basal margin of the anal fin is also a little produced and dark colored. In the male of an allied form, the Xiphophorus Hellerii (fig. 30}, the inferior margin of the caudal fin is developed into a long filament, which, as I hear from Dr. Giinther, is striped with bright colors. This filament does not contain any muscles, and apparently cannot be of any direct use to the fish. As in the case of the Callionymus, the males *" Nature," July, 1873, p. 264. f " Catalogue of Acantb. Fishes in the British Museum," by Dr. Utinther, 161, pp. 138-151. $ " Game Birds of Sweden," etc., 1867, p. 466. With respect to this and the following species I am indebted to Dr. Qtlnther for information; set- also his paper on the " Fishes of Central America," in "Transact. Zoolog. Soc.," vol. vi, 1868, p. 485. FISHES. 383 while young resemble the adult females in color and struct- ure. Sexual differences such as these may be strictly com- pared with those which are so frequent with gallinaceous birds.* In a siluroid fish, inhabiting the fresh waters of South America, the Plecostomus barbatus\ (fig. 31), the male has its mouth and inter-operculum fringed with a beard of stiff hairs, of which the female shows hardly a trace. These Fig. 30. Xiphophorus Hellerii. Upper figure, male ; lower figure, female. hairs are of the nature of scales. In another species of the same genus, soft flexible tentacles project from the front part of the head of the male, which are absent in the. female. These tentacles are prolongations of the true skin, and therefore are not homologous with the stiff hairs of the former species; but it can hardly be doubted that both serve the same purpose. What this purpose may be it is difficult to conjecture; ornament does not here seem prob- able, but we can hardly suppose that stiff hairs and flexible *Dr. Giinther makes this remark; "Catalogue of Fislies in the British Museum," vol. iii, 1861, p. 141. t See Dr. Giinther on this genus, in " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1868, p. THE DESCENT OF MAN. Fig. 81. Plecostomus barbatus. Upper figure, head of male ; lower figure, female. FISHES. 385 filaments can be useful in any ordinary way to the males alone. In that strange monster, the Chimcera monstrosa, the male has a hook-shaped bone on the top of the head, directed forward, with its end rounded and covered with sharp spines ; in the female " this crown is altogether absent," but what its use may be to the male is utterly unknown.* The structures as yet referred to are permanent in the male after he has arrived at maturity; but with some Blen- nies, and in another allied genus, f a crest is developed on the head of the male only during the breeding season, and the body at the same time becomes more brightly colored. There can be little doubt that this crest serves as a tem- porary sexual ornament, for the female does not exhibit a trace of it. In other species of the same genus both sexes possess a crest, and in at least one species neither sex is thus provided. In many of the Chromidae, for instance in Geophagus and especially in Cichla, the males, as I hear from Prof. Agassiz,J have a conspicuous protuberance on the forehead which is wholly wanting in the females and in the young males. Prof. Agassiz adds: "I have often observed these fishes at the time of spawning when the protuberance is largest, and at other seasons when it is totally wanting, and the two sexes show no difference whatever in the outline of the profile of the head. I never could ascertain that it subserves any special func- tion, and the Indians on the Amazon know nothing about its use." These protuberances resemble in their periodical appearance the fleshy carbuncles on the heads of certain Birds; but whether they serve as ornaments must remain at present doubtful. I hear from Prof. Agassiz and Dr. Giinther that the males of those fishes which differ permanently in color from the females often become more brilliant during the breeding season. This is likewise the case with a multitude of fishes, the sexes of which are identical in P. Bnckland in "Land and Water," July, 1868, p. 377, with a figure. Many other cases could be added of structures peculiar to the male, of"which the uses are not known. f Dr. Giinther, "Catalogue of Fishes," vol. iii, pp. 221 and 240. j See also " A Journey in Brazil," by Prof, and Mrs. Agassiz, 1868, p. 220. 386 THE DESCENT OF MAN. color at all other seasons of the year. The tench, roach and perch may be given as instances. The male salmon at this season is "marked on the cheeks with orange- colored stripes, which give it the appearance of a Labrus, and the body partakes of a golden-orange tinge. The females are dark in color, and are commonly called black- fish/'* An analogous and even greater change takes place with the Sal/no eriox or bull trout ; the males of the char (8. umbla) are likewise at this season rather brighter in color than the females, f The colors of the pike ( Esox reticulatus) of the United States, especially of the male, become, during the breeding-season, exceedingly intense, brilliant, and iridescent. J Another striking instance out of many is afforded by the male stickleback (Gastcrosteus leiurus), which is described by Mr. Warmgton, as being then "beautiful beyond description." The back and eyes of the female are simply brown and the belly white. The eyes of the male, on the other hand, are " of the most splendid green, having a metallic luster like the green feathers of some humming-birds. The throat and belly are of a bright crimson, the back of an ashy-green, and the whole fish appears as though it were somewhat translucent and glowed with an internal incandescence." After the breeding-season these colors all change, the throat and belly become of a paler red, the back more green, and the glowing tints subside. With respect to the courtship of fishes, other cases have been observed since the first edition of this book appeared, besides that already given of the stickleback. Mr. W. S. Kent says that the male of the Labrus mixtus, which, as we have seen, differs in color from the female, makes " a deep hollow in the sand of the tank, and then endeavors in the most persuasive manner to induce a female of the same species to share it with him, swimming backward and for- ward between her and the completed nest, and plainly exhibiting the greatest anxiety for her to follow. The males of Cantharus lineatus become, during the breeding- * Yarrell, "British Fishes," vol. ii, 1836, pp. 10, 12, 35. |W. Thompson, in "Annals and Mag. of Nat. History," vol. vi, 1841, p. 440. J" The American Agriculturist," 1868, p. 100. " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," Oct., 1852. FISHES. 387 season, of deep leaden-black; they then retire from the shoal, and excavate a hollow as a nest. " Each male now mounts vigilant guard over his respective hollow, and vig- orously attacks and drives away any other fish of the same sex. Toward his companions of the opposite sex his con- duct is far different; many of the latter are now distended with spawn, and these he endeavors by all the means in his power to lure singly to his prepared hollow, and there to deposit the myriad ova with which they are laden, which he then protects and guards with the greatest care."* A more striking case of courtship, as well as of display, by the males of a Chinese Macropus has been given by M. Carbonnier, who carefully observed these fishes under con- finement, f The males are most beautifully colored, more so than the females. During the breeding-season they con- tend for the possession of the females ; and, in the act of courtship, expand their fins, which are spotted and orna- mented with brightly colored rays, in the same manner, according to M. Carbonnier, as the peacock. They then also bound about the females with much vivacity, and appear by "1'etalage de leurs vives couleurs chercher a attirer Fattention des femelles, lesquelles ne paraissaient indifferentes a ce manege, elles nageaient avec une molle lenteur vers les males et semblaient se complaire dans leur voisinage." After the male has won his bride he makes a little disk of froth by blowing air and mucus out of his mouth. He then collects the fertilized ova dropped by the female in his mouth; and this caused M. Carbonnier much alarm, as he thought that they were going to be devoured. But the male soon deposits them in the disk of froth, after- ward guarding them, repairing the froth, and taking care of the young when hatched. I mention these particulars because, as we shall presently see, there are fishes the males of which hatch their eggs in their mouths; and those who do not believe in the principle of gradual evolution might ask how could such a habit have originated; but the diffi- culty is much diminished when we know that there are fishes which thus collect and carry the eggs; for if delayed by any cause in depositing them, the habit of hatching them in their mouths might have been acquired. * "Nature," May, 1873, p. 25. f " Bull, de la Soc. d'Acclimat.," Paris, Juty, 1869, and Jan. 1870. 388 THE DESCENT OF MAN. To return to our more immediate subject. The case Btands thus; female fishes, as far as I can learn, never will- ingly spawn except in the presence of the males; and the males never fertilize the ova except in the presence of the females. The males fight for the possession of the females. In many species the males while young resemble the females in color; but when adult become much more brilliant, and retain their colors throughout life. In other species the males become brighter than the females and otherwise more highly ornamented, only during the season of love. The males sedulously court the females, and in one case, as we have seen, take pains in displaying their beauty before them. Can it be believed that they would thus act to no purpose during their courtship? And this would be the case unless the females exert some choice and select those males which please or excite them most. If the female exerts such choice, all the above facts on the ornamentation of the males become at once intelligible by the aid of sexual selection. We have next to inquire whether this view of the bright colors of certain male fishes having been acquired through sexual selection can, through the law of the equal trans- mission of characters to both sexes, be extended to those groups in which the males and females are brilliant in the same, or nearly the same, degree and manner. In such a genus as Labrus, which includes some of the most splendid fishes in the world for instance, the Peacock Labrus (L. pavo], described,* with pardonable exaggeration, as formed of polished scales of gold, incrusting lapis-lazuli, rubies, sapphires, emeralds and amethysts we may, with much probability, accept this belief, for we have seen that the sexes in at least one species of the genus differ greatly in color. With some fishes, as with many of the lowest ani- mals, splendid colors may be the direct result of the nature of their tissues and of the surrounding conditions, without the aid of selection of any kind. The gold-fish (Cyprinus auratus), judging from the analogy of the golden variety of the common carp, is perhaps a case in point, as it may owe its splendid colors to a single abrupt variation, due to the conditions to which this fish has been subjected under *Bory de Saint Vincent, in "Diet. Class. d'Hist. Nat.," torn. ix f 1826, p. 151. FISHES. 389 confinement. It is, however, more probable that these colors have been intensified through artificial selection, as this species has been carefully bred in China from a remote period.* Under natural conditions it does not seem prob- able that beings so highly organized as fishes, and which live under such complex relations, should become brilliantly colored without suffering some evil or receiving some bene- fit from so great a change, and consequently without the intervention of natural selection. What, then, are we to conclude in regard to the many fishes, both sexes of which are splendidly colored? Mr. AVallace f believes that the species which frequent reefs, where corals and other brightly-colored organisms abound, are brightly colored in order to escape detection by their enemies; but according to my recollection they were thus rendered highly conspicuous. In the fresh waters of the tropics there are no brilliantly-colored corals or other organisms for the fishes to resemble; yet many species in the Amazons are beautifully colored, and many of the car- nivorous Cyprinidse in India are ornamented with " bright longitudinal lines of various tints. "\ Mr. McClelland, in describing these fishes, goes so far as to suppose that "the peculiar brilliancy of their colors" serves as "a better mark for king-fishers, terns, and other birds which are destined to keep the number of these fishes in check;" but at the present day few naturalists will admit that any animal has been made conspicuous as an aid to its own destruction. It is possible that certain fishes may have been rendered conspicuous in order to warn birds and beasts of prey that they were unpalatable, as explained when treating of caterpillars; but it is not, I believe, known that * Owing to some remarks on this subject made in my work " On the Variation of Animals under Domestication," Mr. W. F. Mayers ("Chinese Notes and Queries," Aug. 1868, p. 123) has searched the ancient Chinese encyclopedias. He finds that gold-fish were first reared in confinement during the Sung Dynasty which commenced A. D. 960. In the year 1129 these fishes abounded. In another place it is said that since the year 1548 there has been " produced at Hangchow's a variety called the fire-fish, from its intensely red color. It is universally admired and there is not a household where it is not cultivated, in rivalry as to its color, and as a source of profit." f " Westminster Review," July, 1867, p. 7. J" Indian Cyprinidae," by Mr. M'CleUand, "Asiatic Researches," . xix, part ii, 1839, p. 230. 390 THE DESCENT OF MAN. any fish, at least any fresh-water fish, is rejected from being distasteful to fish-devouring animals. Ou the whole, the most probable view in regard to the fishes, of which both sexes are brilliantly colored, is that their colors were acquired by the males as a sexual ornament, and were transferred equally, or nearly so, to the other sex. We have now to consider whether, when the male differs in a marked manner from the female in color or in other ornaments, he alone has been modified, the variations being inherited by his male offspring alone ; or whether the female has been specially modified and rendered inconspicu- ous for the sake of protection, such modifications being inherited only by the females. It is impossible to doubt that color has been gained by many fishes as a protection; no one can examine the speckled upper surface of a flounder and overlook its resemblance to the sandy bed of the sea on which it lives. Certain fishes, moreover, can through the action of the nervous system change their colors in adapta- tion to surrounding objects, and that within a short time.* One of the most striking instances ever recorded of an animal being protected by its color (as far as it can be fudged of in preserved specimens), as well as by its form, is that given by Dr. Gimtherf of a pipe-fish, which, with its reddish streaming filaments, is hardly distinguishable from the sea-weed to which its clings with its prehensile tail. But the question now under consideration is whether the females alone have been modified for this object. We can see that one sex will not be modified through natural selection for the sake of protection more than the other, supposing both to vary, unless one sex is exposed for a longer period to danger, or has less power of escaping from such danger than the other; and it does not appear that with fishes the sexes differ in these respects. As far as there is any difference the males, from being generally smaller and from wandering more about, are exposed to greater danger than the females; and yet when the sexes differ the males are almost always the more conspicuously colored. The ova are fertilized immediately after being deposited; and when this process lasts for several days, as in the case of the salmon, t the female during the whole *Q. Pouchet, L'Institut, Nov. 1, 1871, p. 184. t " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1865, p. 327, pi. xiv and xv. j Yarrell, " British Fishes," vol. ii, p. 11. FISHES. 391 time is attended by the male. After the ova are fertilized they are, in most cases, left unprotected by both parents, so that the males and females, as far as oviposition is con- cerned, are equally exposed to danger, and both are equally important for the production of fertile ova; consequently the more or less brightly colored individuals of either sex would be equally liable to be destroyed or preserved, and both would have an equal influence on the colors of their offspring. Certain fishes, belonging to several families, make nests, and some of them take care of their young when hatched. Both sexes of the bright- colored Crenildbrus mttssa and melops work together in building their nests with sea- weed, shells, etc.* But the males of certain fishes do all the work and afterward take exclusive charge of the young. This is the case with the dull-colored gobies, f in which the sexes are not known to differ in color, and likewise with the sticklebacks (Gasterosteus), in which the males become brilliantly colored during the spawning season. The male of the smooth-tailed stickleback ( 0. leiurus} performs the duties of a nurse with exemplary care and vigilance during a long time, and is continually employed in gently leading back the young to the nest when they stray too far. He courageously drives away all enemies, including the females of his own species. It would indeed be no small relief to the male if the female after depositing her eggs were immediately devoured by some enemy, for he is forced incessantly to drive her from the nest.J The males of certain other fishes inhabiting South Amer- ica and Ceylon, belonging to two distinct orders, have the extraordinary habit of hatching within their mouths, or branchial cavities, the eggs laid by the females. I am informed by Prof. Agassiz that the males of the Amazonian * According to the observations of M. Gerbe; see Giinther's " Eecord of Zoolog. Literature," 1865, p. 194 tCuvie"r, " Regne Animal," vol. ii, 1829, p. 242. \ See Mr. Warington's most interesting description of tlie habits of the Gasterosteus leiurus in " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.." Nov., 1855. Prof. Wyman, in "Proc. Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist.," Sept. 15, 1857. Also Prof. Turner, in "Journal of Anatomy and Phys.," Nov. 1, 1866, p. 78. Dr. Giinther has likewise described other 392 THE DESCENT OF MAN. species which follow this habit, ( ' not only are generally brighter than the females, but the difference is greater at the spawning-season than at any other time." The species of Geophagus act in the same manner; and in this genus, a conspicuous protuberance becomes developed on the fore- head of the males during the breeding-season. With the various species of Chromids, as Prof. Agassiz likewise informs me, sexual differences in color may be observed, " whether they lay their eggs in the water among aquatic plants or deposit them in holes, leaving them to come out without further care; or build shallow nests in the river mud, over which they sit, as our Pomotis does. It ought also to be observed that these sitters are among the bright- est species in their respective families; for instance, Hygro- gonus is bright green with large black ocelli, encircled with the most brilliant red." Whether with all the species of Chromids it is the male alone which sits on the eggs is not known. It is, however, manifest that the fact of the eggs being protected or unprotected by the parents, has had little or no influence on the differences in color between the sexes. It is further manifest in all the cases in which the males take exclusive charge of the nests and young, that the destruction of the brighter-colored males would be far more influential on the character of the race than the destruction of the brighter-colored females; for the death of the male during the period of incubation or nursing would entail the death of the young, so that they could not inherit his peculiarities; yet in many of these very cases the males are more conspicuously colored than the females. In most of the Lophobranchii (Pipe-fish, Hippocampi, etc.) the males have either marsupial sacks or hemispherical depressions on the abdomen, in which the ova laid by the female are hatched. The males also show great attachment to their young.* The sexes do not commonly differ much in color; but Dr. Giinther believes that the male Hippo- campi are rather brighter than the females. The genus Solenostoma, however, offers a curious exceptional case,f for the female is much more vividly colored and spotted * Yarrell, " Hist, of British Fishes," vol. ii, 1836, pp. 329, 338. f Dr. Qiinther, since publishing an account of this species in " The Fishes of Zanzibar," by Col. Play fair, 1866, p. 137, has re-examined the specimens and has given rue the above information. FISHES. 393 than the male, and she alone has a marsupial sack and hatches the eggs; so that the female of Solenostoma differs from all the other Lophobranchii in this latter respect, and from almost all other fishes, in being more brightly colored than the male. It is improbable that this remarkable double inversion of character 'in the female should be an accidental coincidence. As the males of several fishes, which take exclusive charge of the eggs and young, are more brightly colored than the females, and as here the female Solenostoma takes the same charge and is brighter than the male, it might be argued that the conspicuous colors of that sex which is the more important of the two for the welfare of the offspring, must be in some manner pro- tective. But from the large number of fishes, of which the males are either permanently or periodically brighter than the females, but whose life is not at all more important for the welfare of the species than that of the female, this view can hardly be maintained. "When we treat of birds we shall meet with analogous cases, where there has been a complete inversion of the usual attributes of the two sexes, and we shall then give what appears to be the probable explanation, namely, that the males have selected the more attractive females, instead of the latter having selected, in accordance with the usual rule throughout the animal kingdom, the more attractive males. On the whole we may conclude, that with most fishes, in which the sexes differ in color or in other ornamental char- acters, the males originally varied, with their variations transmitted to the same sex, and accumulated through sexual selection by attracting or exciting the females. In many cases, however, such characters have been transferred, either partially or completely, to the females. In other cases, again, both sexes have been colored alike for the sake of protection; but in no instance does it appear that the female alone has had her colors or other characters specially modified for this latter purpose. . The-iast point which need be noticed is that fishes are known to make various noises, some of which are described as being musical. Dr. Dufosse, who has especially attended to this subject, says that the sounds are voluntarily pro- duced in several ways by different fishes; by the friction of the pharyngeal bones by the vibration of certain muscles attached to the swim-bladder, which serves as a resounding 394 THE DESCENT OF MAN. board and by the vibration of the intrinsic muscles of the swim-bladder. By this latter means the Trigla produces pure and long-drawn sounds which range over nearly an octave. But the most interesting case for us is that of two species of Ophidium, in which the males alone are provided with a sound-producing apparatus, consisting of small mov- able bones, with proper muscles, in connection with the swim-bladder.* The drumming of the Umbrinas in the European seas is said to be audible from a depth of twenty fathoms; and the fisherman of Eochelle assert "that the males alone make the noise during the spawning-time; and that it is possible by imitating it to take them without bait."f From this statement, and more especially from the case of Ophidium, it is almost certain that in this, the lowest class of the Vertebrata, as with so many insects and spiders, sound-producing instruments have, at least in some cases, been developed through sexual selection, as a means for bringing the sexes together. AMPHIBIANS. Urodela. I will begin with the tailed amphibians. The sexes of salamanders or newts often differ much both in color and structure. In some species prehensile claws are developed on the fore legs of the males during the breeding-season; and at this season in the male Triton palmipes the hind feet are provided with a swimming-web, which is almost completely absorbed during the winter; so that their feet then resemble those of the female. J This structure no doubt aids the male in his eager search and pursuit of the female. While courting her he rapidly vibrates the end of his tail. With our common newts (Triton punctatus and cristatus) a deep, much indented crest is developed along the back and tail of the male during the breeding- season, which disappears during the * "Comptes Rendus." Tom. xlvi, 1858, p. 353. Tom. xlvii, 1858, p. 916. Tom. liv, 1862, p. 393. The noise made by the Umbrinas (Scicena aqutta), is said by some authors to be more like that of a flute or organ, than drumming: Dr. Zouteveen, in the Dutch trans- lation of this work (vol. ii, p. 36), gives some further particulars on the sounds made by fishes. f The Rev. C. Kingsley, in " Nature," May, 1870, p. 40. ; Bell "History of British Reptiles," 2nd edit. 1849, pp. 156-159 AMPHIBIANS. 395 winter. Mr. St. George Mivart informs me that it is not furnished with muscles, and therefore cannot be used for locomotion. As during the season of courtship it becomes edged with bright colors, there can hardly be a doubt that it is a masculine ornament. In many species the body. pre- sents strongly contrasted, though lurid tints, and these become more vivid during the breeding-season. The male, for instance, of our common little newt (Triton punctatus) is " brownish-gray above, passing into yellow beneath, which in the spring becomes a rich bright orange, marked everywhere with round dark spots." The edge of the crest Fig. 32. Triton cristatus (half natural size, from Bell's " British Reptiles "). Upper figure, male during the breeding-season; lower figure, female. also is then tipped with bright red or violet. The female is usually of a yellowish-brown color with scattered brown dots, and the lower surface is often quite plain.* The young are obscurely tinted. The ova are fertilized during the act of deposition, and are not subsequently tended by either parent. We may therefore conclude that the males have acquired their strongly-marked colors and ornamental appendages through sexual selection; these being transmit- ted either to the male offspring alone, or to both sexes. Anura or Batrachia. With many frogs and toads the colors evidently serve as a protection, such as the bright *Ben, "History of British Reptiles," 2d edit., 1849, pp. 146, 151. 396 THE DESCENT OF MAN. green tints of tree frogs and the obscure mottled shades of many terrestrial species. The most conspicuously-colored toad which lever saw, the Pliryniscusnigricans,* had the whole upper surface of the body as black as ink, with the soles of the feet and parts of the abdomen spotted with the brightest vermilion. It crawled about the bare sandy or open grassy plains of La Plata under a scorching sun, "and could not fail to catch the eye of every passing creature. These colors are probably beneficial by making this animal known to all birds of prey as a nauseous mouthful. In Nicaragua there is a little frog " dressed in a bright livery of red and blue " which does not conceal itself like most other species, but hops about during the daytime, and Mr. Belt says f that as soon as he saw its happy sense of security he felt sure that it was uneatable. After several trials he succeeded in tempting a young duck to snatch up a young one, but it was instantly rejected; and the duck ' ( went about jerking its head as if trying to throw off some unpleasant taste." With respect to sexual differences of color Dr. Giinther does not know of any striking instance either with frogs or toads; yet he can often distinguish the male from the female by the tints of the former being a little more intense. Nor does he know of any striking difference in external structure between the sexes, excepting the prominences which become developed during the breeding-season on the front legs of the male, by which he is enabled to hold the female. \ It is surprising that these animals have not acquired more strongly-marked sexual characters; for though cold-blooded their passions are strong. Dr. Giinther informs me that he has several times found an unfortunate female toad dead and smothered from having been so closely embraced by three or four males. Frogs have been observed by Prof. Hoffman in Giessen fighting all day long during the breed- ing season, and with so much violence that one had its body ripped open. * "Zoology of the Voyage of the 'Beagle,' " 1843. Bell, ibid, p. 49. f " The Naturalist in Nicaragua," 1874, p. 321. \ The male alone of the Bufo sikimmensii (Dr. Anderson, " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1871, p. 204) has two plate-like callosities on the thorax and certain rugosities on the fingers, which perhaps subserve the same end as the above mentioned prominences. REPTILES. 397 Frogs and toads offer one interesting sexual difference, namely, in the musical powers possessed by the males; but to speak of music, when applied to the discordant and overwhelming sounds emitted by male bull-frogs and some other species seems, according to our taste, a singularly inappropriate expression. Nevertheless, certain frogs sing in a decidedly pleasing manner. Near Rio Janeiro I used often to sit in the evening to listen to a number of little Hylae perched on blades of grass close to the water, which sent forth sweet chirping notes in harmony. The various sounds are emitted chiefly by the males during the breed- ing-season, as in the case of the croaking of our common frog.* In accordance with this fact the vocal organs of the males are more highly developed than those of the females. In some genera the males alone are provided with sacs which open into the larynx, f For instance, in the edible frog (Rana esculenta) "the sacs are peculiar to the males, and become, when filled with air in the act of croaking, large globular bladders, standing out one on each side of the head near the corners of the mouth/' The croak of the male is thus rendered exceedingly powerful; while that of the female is only a slight groaning noise. J In the sev- eral genera of the family the vocal organs differ considerably in structure, and their development in all cases may be attributed to sexual selection. REPTILES. Chelonia. Tortoises and turtles do not off er well-marked sexual differences. In some species the tail of the male is longer than that of the female. In some the plastron or lower surface of the shell of the male is slightly concave in relation to the back of the female. The male of the mud- turtle of the United States ( Chrysemys pictd) has claws on its front feet twice as long as those of the female; and these are used when the sexes unite. With the huge tortoise of the Galapagos Islands ( Testudo nigra) the males * Bell, " History of British Reptiles," 1849, p. 93. fj. Bishop, in "Todd's Cyclop, of Anat. and Phys.," vol. iv, p. {Bell, ibid, pp. 113-114. , Mr. C. J. Maynard, "The American Naturalist," Dec. 1869, p. 398 THE DESCENT OF MAN. are said to grow to a larger size than the females. During the pairing season, and at no other time, the male utters a hoarse, bellowing noise which can be heard at the distance of more than a hundred yards; the female, on the other hand, never uses her voice.* With the Testudo elegans of India it is said " that the combats of the males may be heard at some distance from the noise they produce in butting against each other. "\ Crocodilia. The sexes apparently do not differ in color; nor do I know that the males fight together, though this is probable, for some kinds make a prodigious display before the females. BartramJ describes the male alligator as striving to win the female by splashing and roaring in the midst of a lagoon, "swollen to an extent ready to burst, with its head and tail lifted up, he springs or twirls round on the surface of the water like an Indian chief rehearsing his feats of war." During the season of love a musky odor is emitted by the submaxiliary glands of the crocodile and pervades their haunts. Ophidia. Dr. Gunther informs me that the males are always smaller than the females, and generally have longer and slenderer tails; but he knows of no other difference in external structure. In regard to color, he can almost always distinguish the male from the female by his more strongly pronounced tints; thus the black zigzag baud on the back of the male English viper is more distinctly defined than in the female. The difference is much plainer in the rattlesnakes of North America, the male of which, as the keeper in the Zoological Gardens showed me, can at once be distinguished from the female by having more lurid yellow about its whole body. In S. Africa the Bucephalus capensis presents an analogous difference, for the female " is never so fully variegated with yellow on the sides as the male. || The male of the Indian Dipsas cynodon, * See my " Journal of Researches during the Voyage of the 'Beagle, '"1845, p. 384. fDr. Gunther, " Reptiles of British India," 1864, p. 7. \ " Travels through Carolina," etc., 1791, p. 128. iOwcn, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. i, 1866, p. 615. (Sir Andrew Smith, " Zoolog. of S. Africa: Reptilia," 1849, pi. x. REPTILES. 399 on the other hand, is blackish-brown, with the belly partly black, while the female is reddish or yellowish-olive, with the belly either uniform yellowish or marbled with black. In the Tragops dispar of the same country the male is bright green and the female bronze colored.* No doubt the colors of some snakes are protective,, as shown by the green tints of tree-snakes and the various mottled shades of the species which live in sandy places; but it is doubtful whether the colors of many kinds, for instance of the common English snake and viper, serve to conceal them; and this is still more doubtful with the many foreign species which are colored with extreme elegance. The colors of certain species are very different in the adult and young states, f During the breeding-season the anal scent-glands of snakes are in active function; J and so it is with the same glands in lizards, and as we have seen with the submaxiliary glands of crocodiles. As the males of most animals search for the females, these odoriferous glands probably serve to excite or charm the female, rather than to guide her to the spot where the male may be found. Male snakes, though appearing so sluggish, are amorous; for many have been observed crowding round the same female, and even round her dead body. They are not known to fight together from rivalry. Their intellectual powers are higher than might have been anticipated. In the Zoological Gardens they soon learn not to strike at the iron bar with which their cages are cleaned; and Dr. Keen, of Philadelphia, informs me that some snakes which he kept learned after four or five times to avoid a noose, with which they were at first easily caught. An excellent observer in Ceylon, Mr. E. Layard, saw a cobra thrust its head through a narrow hole and swallow a, toad. " With this incumbrance he could not withdraw himself; finding this, he reluctantly dis- gorged the precious morsel, which began to move off; this *Dr. A. Giintlier, "Reptiles of British India," Ray Soc., 1864, pp. 304, 308. f Dr. Stoliczka, " Journal of Asiatic Soc. of Bengal," vol. xxxix, 1870, pp. 205, 211. J Owen, " Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. i, 1866, p. 615. " Rambles in Ceylon," in " Annals and Mag. ol tfai. Hist.," 3d series, vqi. ix, 1852, p. 333. 400 THE DESCENT OF MAN. was too much for snake philosophy to bear, and the toad was again seized, and again was the snake, after violent efforts to escape, compelled to part with its prey. This time, however, a lesson had been learned, and the toad was seized by one leg, withdrawn, and then swallowed in triumph." The keeper in the Zoological Gardens is positive that certain snakes, for instance Crotalus and Python, distin- guish him from all other persons. Cobras kept together in the same cage apparently feel some attachment toward each other.* It does not* however, follow because snakes have some reasoning power, strong passions and mutual affection, that they should likewise be endowed with sufficient taste to admire brilliant colors in their partners, so as to lead to the adornment of the species through sexual selection. Nevertheless, it is difficult to account in any other manner for the extreme beauty of certain species; for instance, of the coral-snakes of South America, which are of a rich red with black and yellow transverse bands. I well remember how much surprise I felt at the beauty of the first coral- snake which I saw gliding across a path in Brazil. Snakes colored in this peculiar manner, as Mr. Wallace states on the authority of Dr. Grunther,f are found nowhere else in the world except in South America, and here no less than four genera occur. One of these, Elaps, is venomous; a second and widely-distinct genus is doubtfully venomous, and the two others are quite harmless. The species belong- ing to these distinct genera inhabit the same districts, and are so like each other that no one " but a naturalist would distinguish the harmless from the poisonous kinds." Hence, as Mr. Wallace believes, the innocuous kinds have proba- bly acquired their colors as a protection, on the principle of imitation; for they would naturally be thought dangerous by their enemies. The cause, however, of the bright colors of the venomous Elaps remains to be explained, and this may perhaps be sexual selection. Snakes produce other sounds besides hissing. The deadly Ecliis carinata has on its sides some oblique rows of scales of a peculiar structure with serrated edges ; and *Dr. Giinther, " Reptiles of British India," 1864, p. 340. f " Westminster Review," July 1, 1867, p. 33. REPTILES. 401 when this snake is excited these scales are rubbed against each other, which produces "a, curious prolonged, almost hissing sound. " * With respect to the rattling of the rattlesnake, we have at last some definite information; for Prof essor Aughey states, f that on two occassons, being him- self unseen, he watched from a little distance a rattlesnake coiled up with head erect, which continued to rattle at short intervals for half an hour; and at last he saw another snake approach, and when they met they paired. Hence he is satisfied that one of the uses of the rattle is to bring the sexes together. Unfortunately he did not ascertain whether it was the male or the female which remained stationary and called for the other. But it by no means follows from the above fact that the rattle may not be of use to these snakes in other ways, as a warning to animals which would otherwise attack them. Nor can I quite dis- believe the several accounts which have appeared of their thus paralyzing their prey with fear. Some other snakes also make a distinct noise by rapidly vibrating their tails against the surrounding stalks of plants ; and I have myself heard this in the case of a Trigonocephalus in South America. Lacertilia. The males of some, probably of many kinds of lizards, fight together from rivalry. Thus the arboreal Anolis cristatellus of South America is extremely pugna- cious: " During the spring and early part of the summer, two adult males rarely meet without a contest. On first seeing one another, they nod their heads up and down three or four times, and at the same time expanding the frill or pouch beneath the throat; their eyes glisten with rage, and after waving their tails from side to side for a few seconds, as if to gather energy, they dart at each other furiously, rolling over and over, and holding firmly with their teeth. The conflict generally ends in one of the com- batants losing his tail, which is often devoured by the victor. " The male of this species is considerably larger than the female;! and this, as far as Dr. Giinther has been *Dr. Anderson, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1871, p. 196. t " The American Naturalist/' 1873, p. 85. | Mr. N. L. Austen kept these animals alive for a considerable time; see ',' Land and Water," July, 1867, p. 9. 402 THE DESCENT OF MAN. able to ascertain, is the general rule with lizards of all kinds. The male alone of the Cyrtodactyhis rubidus of the Anda- man Islands possesses pre-anal pores; and these pores, judg- ing from analogy, probably serve to emit an odor.* The sexes often differ greatly in various external charac- ters. The male of the above-mentioned Anolis is f umished with a crest which runs along the back and tail, and can be erected at pleasure ; but of this crest the female does not exhibit a trace. In the Indian CopJiotis ceylanica the female has a dorsal crest, though much less developed than in the male; and so it is, as Dr. Giinther informs me, with the females of many Iguanas, Chameleons and other lizards. In some species, however, the crest is equally developed in both sexes, as in the Iguana tuberculata. In the genus Sitana, the males alone are furnished with a large throat- pouch (fig. 33), which can be folded up like a fan, and is Sitana minor. Male with colored blue, black and red; but these splendid colors are exhibited only during the pair- ing-season. The female does not possess even a rudi- ment of this appendage. In the Anolis cristatellus accord- ing to Mr. Auster . the throat pouch, which is bright red marbled with yellow, is present in the female, though in a rudimental condition. Again, in certain other lizards, both sexes are equally well provided with throat pouches. Here we see with species belonging to the same group, as in BO many previous cases, the same character either con- fined to the males or more largely developed in them than in the females, or again equally developed in both sexes. The little lizards of the genus Draco, which glide through the air on their rib-supported parachutes, and which in the beauty of their colors baffle description, are furnished with skinny appendages to the throat " like the wattles of gall- inaceous birds." These become erected when the animal * Stoliczka, " Journal of Asiatic Soc. of Bengal," vol. xxxiv, 1870, p. 166. REPTILES. 403 is excited. They occur in both sexes, but are best devel- oped when the male arrives at maturity, at which age the middle appendage is sometimes twice as long as the head. Most of the species likewise have a low crest running along the neck; and this is much more developed in the full-grown males than in the females or young males.* A Chinese species is said to live in pairs during the spring; "and if one is caught the other falls from the tree to the ground, and allows itself to be captured with im- punity/' I presume from despair, f There are other and much more remarkable differences between the sexes of certain lizards. The male of Ceratophora aspera bears on the extremity of his snout an appendage half as long as the head. It is cylindrical, covered with scales, flexible and apparently capable of erection; in the female it is quite rudimental. In a second species of the same genus a ter- minal scale forms a minute horn on the summit of the flexible appendage; and in a third species n vt 1J i" (fi Q/(\ 44, V. l Fig. 34. Ceratophora Stoddartn. 6. Stoddarhl (fig. 34), the whole Upper figure, male; lower appendage is converted into a horn, figure, female, which is usually of a white color, but assumes a purplish tint when the animal is excited. In the adult male of this latter species the horn is half an inch in length, but it is of quite minute size in the female and in the young. These appendages, as. Dr. Giinther has remarked to me, may be compared with the combs of gall- inaceous birds, and apparently serve as ornaments. In the genus Chameleon we come to the acme of differ- ence between the sexes. The upper part of the skull of the male C. Mfurcus (fig. 35), an inhabitant of Madagascar, is produced into two great, solid, bony projections, covered * All the foregoing statements and quotations in regard to Copho- tis, Sitana and Draco, as well as the following facts in regard to Ceratophora and Charnaeleon, are from Dr. Gtinther himself, or from his magnificent work on the "Reptiles of British India," Ray Soc.. 1864, pp. 122, 130, 135. fMr. Swlnhoe, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1870, p. 240. 404 THE DESCENT OF MAN. with scales like tne resT; of the head; and of this wonderful modification of structure the female exhibits only a rudi- ment. Again, in Chamceleo Owenii (fig. 36), from the vest coast of Africa, the male bears on his snout and fore- Pig. 85. Chanueleo bif urcus. Upper figure, male ; lower figure, female. head three curious horns, of which the female has not a trace. These horns consist of an excrescence of bone covered with a smooth sheath, forming part of the general integuments of the body, so that they are identical in structure with those of a bull, goat, or other sheath-horned ruminant. Although the three horns differ so much in appearance from the two great prolongations of the skull REPTILES. 405 in O. Mfurcus, we can hardly doubt that they serve the same general purpose in the economy of these two animals. The first conjecture, which will occur to every one, is that they are used by the males for fighting together; and as these animals are very quarrelsome,* this is probably a cor- rect view. Mr. T. W. Wood also informs me that he once watched two individuals of C. pumilus fighting violently on the branch of a tree; they flung their heads about and tried to bite each other; they then rested for a time and afterward continued their battle. Pig. 36. Chamasleo Owenil. Upper figure, male; lower figure, female. With many lizards the sexes differ slightly in color, the tints and stripes of the males being brighter and more dis- tinctly defined than in the females. This, for instance, is the case with the above Cophotis and with the Acantlio- dactylus capensis of S. Africa. In a Cordylus of the latter country, the male is either much redder or greener than the female. In the Indian Galotes nigrilabris there is a still greater difference; the lips also of the male are black, while those of the female are green. In our common little viviparous lizard (Zootoca vivipara) " the under side of the body and base of the tail in the male are bright orange, *Dr. Bucholz, 78. * Monatsberioht K. Preuss. Akad,," Jan,, 1874, 406 THE DESCENT OF MAN. spotted with black; in the female these parts are pale gray- ish green without spots."* We have seen that the males alone of Sitana possess a throat-pouch; and this is splen- didly tinted with blue, black and red. In the Proctotretus tenuis of Chili the male alone is marked with spots of blue, green and coppery red. f In many cases the males retain the same colors throughout the year, but in others they become much brighter during the breeding-season; I may give as an additional instance the Calotes maria, which at this season has a bright red head, the rest of the body being green. J Both sexes of many species are beautifully colored exactly alike; and there is no reason to suppose that such colors are protective. No doubt with the bright-green kinds which live in the midst of vegetation, this color serves to conceal them; and in N. Patagonia I saw a lizard (Proctotretus multimaculatus) which, when frightened, flattened its body, closed its eyes, and then from its mottled tints was hardly distinguishable from the surrounding sand. But the bright colors with which so many lizards are ornamented, as well as their various curious appendages, were probably acquired by the males as an attraction, and then transmitted either to their male offspring alone, or to both sexes. Sexual selection, indeed, seems to have played almost as important a part with reptiles as with birds; and the less conspicuous colors of the females in comparison with the males cannot be accounted for, as Mr. Wallace believes to be the case with birds, by the greater exposure of the females to danger during incubation. *Bell, " History of British Reptiles," 2d edit., 1849, p. 40. f For Proctotretus see "Zoology of the Voyage of the 'Beagle;' Reptiles," by Mr. Bell, p. 8. For the lizards of S. Africa, see " Zoology of S. Africa: Reptiles," by Sir Andrew Smith, pi. 25 and 39. For the Indian Calotes, see " Reptiles of British India," by Dr., Giinther, p. 143. JGuntherin "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1870, p. 778, with a colored figure. BIRDS. 407 CHAPTER XIII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF BIRDS. Sexual differences Law of battle Special weapons Vocal organs Instrumental music Love-antics and dances Decorations, permanent and seasonal Double and single annual moults Display of ornaments by the males. SECONDARY sexual characters are more diversified and conspicuous in birds, though not perhaps entailing more important changes of structure, than in any other class of animals. I shall, therefore, treat the subject at consider- able length. Male birds sometimes, though rarely, possess special weapons for fighting with each other. They charm the female by vocal or instrumental music of the most varied kinds. They are ornamented by all sorts of combs, wattles, protuberances, horns, air-distended sacks, top-knots, naked shafts, plumes and lengthened feathers gracefully spring- ing from all parts of the body. The beak and naked skin about the head and the feathers are often gorgeously col- ored. The males sometimes pay their court by dancing or by fantastic antics performed either on the ground or in the air. In one instance, at least, the male emits a musky odor, which we may suppose serves to charm or excite the female; for that excellent observer, Mr. Eamsay,* says of the Australian musk duck (Biziura lobata) that "the smell which the male emits during the summer months is confined to that sex, and in some individuals is retained throughout the year. I have never, even in the breeding- season, shot a female which had any smell of musk." So powerful is this odor during the pairing-season that it can be detected long before the bird can be seen.f On the whole, birds appear to be the most aesthetic of all animals, excepting of course man, and they have nearly the same * " Ibis," vol. iii (new series), 1867, p. 414. 4 Gould, "Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," 1865, vol. ii, p. 408 THE DESCENT OF MAN, taste for the beautiful 'as we have. This is shown by our enjoyment of the singing of birds, and by our women, both civilized and savage, decking their heads with borrowed plumes and using gems which are hardly more brilliantly colored than the naked skin and wattles of certain birds. In man, however, when cultivated the sense of beauty is manifestly a far more complex feeling and is associated with various intellectual ideas. Before treating of the sexual characters with which we are here more particularly concerned, I may just allude to certain differences between the sexes which apparently depend on differences in their habits of life; for such cases, though common in the lower, are rare in the higher classes. Two humming - birds belonging to the genus Eustephanus, which inhabit the Island of Juan Fernandez, were long thought to be specifically distinct, but are now known, as Mr. Gould informs me, to be the male and female of the same species, and they differ slightly in the form of the beak. In another genus of hum- ming-birds ( Grypus] the beak of the male is serrated along the margin and hooked at the extremity, thus differing much from that of the female. In the Neomorpha of New Zealand, there is, as we have seen, a still wider difference in the form of the beak in relation to the manner of feed- ing of the two sexes. Something of the same kind has been observed with the goldfinch (Carduelis elegans), for I am assured by Mr. Jcnner "Weir that the bird-catchers can distinguish the males by their slightly longer beaks. The flocks of males are often found feeding on the seeds of the teazle (Dipsacus), which they can reach with their elongated beaks, while the females more commonly feed on the seeds of the betony or Scrophularia. With a slight difference of this kind as a foundation we can see how the beaks of the two sexes might be made to differ greatly through natural selection. In some of the above cases, however, it is possible that the beaks of the males may have been first modified in relation to their contests with other males; and that this afterward led to slightly changed habits of life. Law of Battle. Almost all male birds are extremely pugnacious, using their beaks, wings, and legs for fighting together. .We see this every spring with our robins and BIRDS. 409 sparrows. The smallest of all birds, namely, the humming- bird, is one of the most quarrelsome. Mr. Gosse* describes a battle in which a pair seized hold of each other's beaks, and whirled round and round till they almost fell to the ground; and M. Montes de Oca, in speaking of another genus of humming-bird, says that two males rarely meet without a fierce aerial encounter; when kept in cages " their fighting has mostly ended in the splitting of the tongue of one of the two, which then surely dies from being unable to feed."f With Waders, the males of the common water- hen (Gallinula chloropus) "when pairing, fight violently for the females; they stand nearly upright in the water and strike with their feet." Two were seen to be thus engaged for half an hour, until one got hold of the head of the other, which would have been killed had not the observer interfered; the female all the time looking on as a quiet spectator. \ Mr. Blyth informs me that the males of an allied bird ( Gallicrex cristatus) are a third larger than the females, and are so pugnacious during the breeding-season that they are kept by the natives of Eastern Bengal for the sake of fighting. Various other birds are kept in India for the same purpose, for instance, the bulbuls (Pycnonotus hcemorrhous) which " fight with great spirit." | The polygamous ruff, Machetes pugnax (fig. 37), is notorious for his extreme pugnacity; and in the spring, the males, which are considerably larger than the females, .con- gregate day after day at a particular spot, \vhere the females propose to lay their eggs. The fowlers discover these spots by the turf being trampled somewhat bare. Here they fight very much like game-cocks, seizing each other with their beaks and striking with their wings. The great ruff of feathers round the neck is then erected, and according to Col. Montagu " sweeps the ground as a shield to defend the more tender parts;" and this is the only instance known to me in the case of birds of any structure serving as a shield. The ruff of feathers, however, from its varied and * Quoted by Mr. Gould, "Introduction to the Trochilidae," 1861, p. 29. f Gould, ibid, p. 52. j W. Thompson, " Nat Hist, of Ireland; Birds," vol. ii, 1850, p. 327. Jerdon, "Birds of India," 1863, vol. ii, p. 96, 410 THE DESCENT OF MAN, rich colors probably serves in chief part as an ornament. Like most pugnacious birds, they seem always ready to fight, and when closely confined often kill each other; but Montagu observed that their pugnacity becomes greater during the spring, when the long feathers on their necks are fully developed; and at this period the least movement BIRDS. 4H by any one bird provokes a general battle.* Of the pug- nacity of web-footed birds, two instances will suffice ; in Guiana " bloody fights occur during the breeding-season between the males of the wild musk-duck (Cairina mo- schata) ; and where these fights have occurred the " river is covered for some distance with feathers." f Birds which seem ill-adapted for fighting engage in fierce conflicts; thus the stronger males of the pelican drive away the weaker ones, snapping with their huge beaks and giving heavy blows with their wings. Male snipe fight together, "tug- ging and pushing each other with their bills in the most curious manner imaginable." Some few birds are believed never to fight; this is the case, according to Audubon, with one of the woodpeckers of the United States (Picu sau- ratus), although " the hens are followed by even half a dozen of their gay suitors." J The males of many birds are larger than the females, and this no doubt is the' result of the advantage gained by the larger and stronger males over their rivals during many generations. The difference in size between the two sexes is carried to an extreme point in several Australian species; thus the male musk-duck (Biziura) and the male Cinclor- amplius cruralis (allied to our pipjs) are by measure- ment actually twice as large as their respective females. With many other birds the females are larger than the males; and, as formerly remarked, the explanation often given, namely, that the females have most of the work in feeding their young, will not suffice. In some few cases, as we shall hereafter see, the females apparently have acquired their greater size and strength for the sake of con- quering other females and obtaining possession of the males. The males of many gallinaceous birds, especially of the polygamous kinds, are furnished with special weapons foi fighting with their rivals, namely spurs, which can be used * Macgillivray, "Hist. Brit. Birds," vol. iv, 1852, pp. 177-iSl. fSir R. Schomburgk, in " Journal of R. Geograph. Soc.," vol. xiii, 1843, p. 81. | " Ornithological Biography," vol. i, p. 191. For pelicans and snipes, see vol. iii, pp. 138, 477. jGould, "Hand-book of Birds of Australia," vol. i, p. 395; vol. ii, 412 THE DESCENT OF MAN. with fearful effect. It has been recorded by a trustworthy writer* that in Derbyshire a kite struck at a game-hen accompanied by her chickens, when the cock rushed to the fescue, and drove his spur right through the eye and skull of the aggressor. The spur was with difficulty drawn from the skull, jpd as the kite, though dead, retained his grasp, the two birds were firmly locked together ; but the cock when disentangled was very little injured. The invincible courage of the game-cock is notorious ; a gentleman who long ago witnessed the brutal scene, told me that a bird had both its legs broken by some accident in the cock-pit, and the owner laid a wager that if the legs could be spliced so that the bird could stand upright, he would continue fighting. This was effected on the spot, and the bird fought with undaunted courage until he received his death- stroke. In Ceylon a closely allied, wild species, the Gallus Staiileyi, is known to fight desperately " in defense of his seraglio," so that one of the combatants is frequently found dead.f An Indian partridge (Ortygornis gularis), the male of which is furnished with strong and sharp spurs, is so quarrelsome " that the scars of former fights disfigure the breast of almost every bird you kill."J The males of alriaost all gallinaceous birds, even those which are not furnished with spurs, engage during the breeding-season in fierce conflicts. The Capercailzie and Black-cock (Tetrao urogallus and T. tetrix) which are both polygamists, have regular appointed places, where during many weeks they congregate in numbers to fight together and to display their charms before the females. Dr. W. Kovalevsky informs me that in Russia he has seen the snow all bloody on the arenas where the capercailzie have fought; and the black-cocks " make the feathers fly in every direction," when several " engage in a battle royal." The elder Brehm gives a curious account of the Balz, as the love-dances and love-songs of the black-cock are called in Germany. The bird utters almost contin- uously the strangest noises: "he holds his tail up and spreads it out like a fan, he lifts up his head and neck with all the feathers erect, and stretches his wings from the *Mr. Hewitt in the "Poultry Book by Tegetmeier," 1866, p. 137. f Layard, " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. xiv, 1854, p. 63- | Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 574. BIRDS. 413 body. Then he takes a few jumps in different direc- tions, sometimes in a circle, and presses the under part of his beak so hard against the ground that the chin feathers are rubbed off. During these move- ments he beats his wings and turns round and round. The more ardent he grows the more lively he becomes, until at last the bird appears like a frantic creat- ure." At such times the black-cocks are so absorbed that they become almost blind and deaf, but less so than the capercailzie; hence bird after bird may be shot on the same spot, or even caught by the hand. After performing these antics the males begin to fight; and the same black-cock, in order to prove his strength over several antagonists, will visit in the course of one morning several Balz-places, which remain the same during successive years.* The peacock with his long train appears more like a dandy than a warrior, but he sometimes engages in fierce contests; the Rev. W. Darwin Fox informs me that at some little distance from Chester two peacocks became so excited while fighting that they flew over the whole city, still engaged, until they alighted on the top of St. John's tower. The spur, in those gallinaceous birds which are thus pro- vided, is generally single; but Polyplectron (see fig. 51) has two or more on each leg; and one of the blood-pheas- ants (Ithaginis criientus) has been seen with five spurs. The spurs are generally confined to the male, being repre- sented by mere knobs or rudiments in the female; but the females of the Java peacock (Pavo muticus) and, as I am informed by Mr. Blyth, of the small fire-backed pheasant ( Euplocamus erythropthalmus) possess spurs. In Gralloper- dix it is usual for the males to have two spurs, and for the females to have only one on each leg. f Hence spurs may be considered as a masculine structure, which has been occasionally more or less transferred to the females. Like most other secondary sexual characters, the spurs are highly variable, both in number and development, in the same species. Various birds have spurs on their wings. But the Egyp- *Brelim, " Illust. Thierleben," 1867, B. iv, s. 351. Some of the foregoing statements are taken from L. Lloyd, " The Game Birds of Sweden," etc., 1867, p. 79. f Jerdon, " Birds of India," on Ithaginis, vol. iii, p. 523; on Gallo- perdix, p. 541. 414 THE DESCENT OF MAN. tian goose (Cktitoalopex cegyptiacus) has only "bare obtuse knobs," and these probably show us the first steps by which true spurs have been developed in other species. In the spur-winged goose (Plectropterus gamlensis) the males have much larger spurs than the females; and they use them, as I am informed by Mr. Bartlett, in fighting to- gether, so that, in this case, the wing-spurs serve as sexual ^weapons ; but according to Livingstone, they are chiefly used in the defense of the young. The Palamedea (fig. 38) is armed with a pair of spurs on each wing; and these are such formidable weapons that a single blow has been known to drive a dog howling away. But it does not appear that the spurs in this case, or in that of some of the spur- winged rails, are larger in the male than in the female.* In certain plovers, however, the wing-spurs must be con- sidered as a sexual character. Thus in the male of our common peewit ( Vanellus cristatus) the tubercle on the shoulder of the wing becomes more prominent during the breeding-season, and the males fight together. In some species of Lobivauellus a similar tubercle becomes developed during the breeding-season " into a short, horny spur." In the Australian L. lobatus both sexes have spurs, but these are much larger in the males than in the females. In an allied bird, the Hoplopterus armatus, the spurs do not in- crease in size during the breeding-season; but these birds have been seen in Egypt to fight together, in the same man- ner as our peewits, by turning suddenly in the air and striking sideways at each other, sometimes with fatal results. Thus also they drive away other enemies, f The season of love is that of battle; but the males of some birds, as of the game-fowl and ruff, and even the young males of the wild turkey and grouse^ are ready to *For the Egyptian goose, see Macgillivray, "British Birds," vol iv, p. 639. For Plectropterus, " Livingstone's Travels," p. 254. For Palamedea, Brehm's "Thierleben," B. iv, s. 740. See also on this bird Azara, "Voyages dans 1'Arnerique merid.," torn, iv, 1809, pp. 179, 253. fSee, on our peewit, Mr. R. Carr in "Land and Water," Aug. 8, 1868, p. 46. In regard to Lobivanellus, see Jerdon's " Birds of India," vol. iii. p. 647, and Gould's "Hand-book of Birds of Austra- lia," vol. ii, p. 220. For the Holopterus, see Mr. Allen in the " Ibis," vol. v, 1863. p. 156. \ Audubon, "Ornith. Biography," vol. ii, p. 492; vol. i, pp. 4-13. BIRDS, 15 fight whenever they meet. The presence of the female is Pig. 88, Palamedea cornuta (from Brehm), showing the double wing-spurs and the filament on the teterrjima belli causa. The Bengali baboos make the pretty little males of the amadavat (Estrelda amandavd) 416 THE DESCENT OF MAN. fight together by placing three small cages in a row with a female in the middle: after a little time the two males are turned loose and immediately a desperate battle ensues.* When many males congregate at the same appointed spot and fight together, as in the case of grouse and various other birds, they are generally attended by the females, f which afterward pair with the victorious combatants. But in some cases the pairing precedes instead of succeeding the combat; thus according to Audubon,J several males of the Virginian goat -sucker (Caprimulgus virginianus) " court in a highly entertaining manner the female, and no sooner has she made her choice than her approved gives chase to all intruders, and drives them beyond his dominions." Generally the males try to drive away or kill their rivals before they pair. It does not, however, appear that the females invariably prefer the victorious males. I have indeed been assured by Dr. W. Kovalevsky that the female capercailzie sometimes steals away with a young male who has not dared to enter the arena with the older cocks, in the same manner as occasionally happens with the does of the red-deer in Scotland. When two males contend in presence of a single female, the victor, no doubt, com- monly gains his desire; but some of these battles are caused by wandering males trying to distract the peace of an already mated pair. Even with the most pugnacious species it is probable that the pairing does not depend exclusively on the mere strength and courage of the male: for such males are generally decorated with various ornaments, which often become more brilliant during the breeding - season, and which are sedulously displayed before the females. The *Mr. Blyth. " Land and Water." 1867, p. 212. f Richardson on Tetrao umbellus " Fauna Bor. Amer. : Birds,* 1831.. p. 343. L. Lloyd, " Game Birds of Sweden," 1867, pp. 22, 79, on the capercailzie and black-cock Brehin, however, asserts ("Thierleben," etc., B. iv, s. 352) that in Germany the gray-hens do not generally attend the Balzen of the black-cocks, but this is an exception to the common rule; possibly the hens may lie hidden in the surrounding bushes, as is known to be the case with the gray- hens in Scandinavia, and with other species in North America. t " Ornithological Biography," vol. ii. p. 275. KBrehm, "Thierleben," etc., B iv, 1867, p. 990. Audubc0, " Ornith. Biography,'' vol ii, p, 492. * BIRDS. 417 males also endeavor to charm or excite their mates by love- notes, songs and antics ; and the courtship is, in many instances, a prolonged affair. Hence, it is not probable that the females are indifferent to the charms of the oppo- site sex, or that they are invariably compelled to yield to the victorious males. It is more probable that the females are excited, either before or after the conflict, by certain males, and thins unconsciously prefer them. In the case of Tetrao umbellus, a good observer * goes so far as to believe that the battles of the males "are all a sham, performed to show themselves to the greatest advantage before the admiring females who assemble around; for I have never been able to find a maimed hero, and seldom more than a broken feather." I shall have to recur to this subject, but I may here add that with the Tetrao cupido of the United States, about a score of males assemble at a particular spot, and, strutting about, make the whole air resound with their extraordinary noises. At the first answer from a female the males begin to fight furiously, and the weaker give way; but then, according to Audubon, both the victors and vanquished search for the female, so that the females must either then exert a choice, or the battle must be renewed. So, again, with one of the field-starlings of the United States (Sturnella ludoviciana) the males engage in fierce conflicts, " but at the sight of a female they all fly after her as if mad." f Vocal and Instrumental Music. With birds the voice serves to express various emotions, such as distress, fear, anger, triumph, or mere happiness. It is apparently sometimes used to excite terror, as in the case of the hissing noise made by some nestlings-birds. Audubon J relates that a night-heron (Ardea nycticorax, Linn.) which he kept tame, used to hide itself when a cat approached, and then " suddenly start up uttering one of the most frightful cries, apparently enjoying the cat's alarm and flight." The common domestic cock clucks to the hen, and the hen to her chickens, when a dainty morsel is * " Land and Water." July 25, 1868. p. 14. f Audubon's " Ornitholog. Biography;" on Tetrao cupido, vol. ii, p. 492; on the Sturnus, vol. ii, p. 219. \ " Ornithological Biograph.," vol. v, p. 601. 418 THE DESCENT OF MAN. found. The hen, when she has laid an egg, " repeats the same note very often, and concludes with the sixth above, which she holds for a longer time;"* and thus she expresses her joy. Some social birds apparently call to each other for aid; and as they flit from tree to tree the flock is kept together by chirp answering chirp. During the nocturnal migrations of geese and other water-fowl sonorous clangs from the van may be heard in the darkness overhead, answered by clangs in the rear. Certain cries serve as danger signals, which, as the sportsman knows to his cost, are understood by the same species and by others. The domestic cock crows, and the humming-bird chirps in triumph over a defeated rival. The true song, however, of most birds and various strange cries are chiefly uttered during the breeding-season, and serve as a charm, or merely as a call-note to the other sex. Naturalists are much divided with respect to the object of the singing of birds. Few more careful observers ever lived than Montagu, and he maintained that the " males of song-birds and of many others do not in general search for the female, but on the contrary, their business in the spring is to perch on some conspicuous spot, breathing out their full and amorous notes, which, by instinct, the female knows, and repairs to the spot to choose her mate."f Mr. Jenner Weir informs me that this is certainly the case with the nightingale. Bechstein, who kept birds during his whole life, asserts " that the female canary always chooses the best singer, and that in a state of nature the female finch selects that male out of a hundred whose notes please her most.";); There can be no doubt that birds closely attend to each other's song. Mr. Weir has told me of the case of a bullfinch which had been taught to pipe a German waltz, and who was so good a performer that he cost ten guineas; when this bird was first introduced into a room where other birds were kept and he began to sing, all the others, consisting of about twenty linnets and canaries, *The Hon. Daines Barrington, " Philosoph. Transact.," 1773, p. 252. f" Ornithological Dictionary," 1833, p. 475. $ " Naturgeschichte der Stul)rnvogel," 1840, s. 4. Mr. Harrison Weir likewise writes to ine: "I am informed that the best singing males generally get a mate first, when they are bred in the same " BIRDS. 419 ranged themselves on the nearest side of their cages and list- ened with the greatest interest to the new performer. Many naturalists believe that the singing of birds is almost ex- clusively " the effect of rivalry and emulation," and not for the sake of charming their mates. This was the opinion of Daines Barrington and White of Selborne, who both especially attended to this subject.* Barrington, however, admits that "superiority in song gives to birds an amazing ascendency over others, as is well known to bird- catchers." It is certain that there is an intense degree of rivalry between the males in their singing. Bird fanciers match their birds to see which will sing longest; and I was told by Mr. Yarrell that a first-rate bird will sometimes sing till he drops down almost dead, or according to Bechstein,f quite dead from rupturing a vessel in the lungs. What- ever the cause may be, male birds, as I hear from Mr. Weir, often die suddenly during the season of song. That the habit of singing is sometimes quite independent of love is clear, for a sterile, hybrid canary-bird has been described}: as singing while viewing itself in a mirror and then dash- ing at its own image ; it likewise attacked with fury a female canary when put into the same cage. The jealousy excited by the act of singing is constantly taken advantage of by bird-catchers; a male, in good song, is hidden and protected, while a stuffed bird surrounded by limed twigs is expose to view. In this manner, as Mr. Weir informs me, a man has in the course of a single day caught fifty, and in one instance seventy male chaffinches. The poAver and inclination to sing differ so greatly with birds that although the price of an ordinary male chaffinch is only sixpence, Mr. Weir saw one bird for which the bird-catcher asked three pounds ; the test of a really good singer being that it will continue to sing while the cage is swung round the owner's head. That male birds should sing from emulation as well as for charming the female is not at all incompatible; and it might have been expected that these two habits would * "Philosophical Transactions," 1773, p. 263. White's " Natural History of Selborne," 1825, vol. i, p. 246. f " Naturgesch. der Stubenvogel," 1840, s. 252. $Mr. Bold, "Zoologist," 1843-44, p. 659. 420 THE DESCENT OF MAN. have occurred, like those of display and pugnacity. Some authors, however, argue that the song of the male cannot serve to charm the female, because the females of some few species, such as of the canary, robin, lark and bull- finch, especially when in a state of widowhood, as Bech- stein remarks, pour forth fairly melodious strains. In some of these cases the habit of singing may be in part attributed to the females having been highly fed and con- fined,* for this disturbs all the usual functions connected with the reproduction of the species. Many instances have already been given of the partial transference of sec- ondary masculine characters to the females, so that it is not at all surprising that the females of some species should possess the power of song. It has also been argued that the song of the male cannot serve as a charm, because the males of certain species, for instance of the robin, sing during the autumn, f But nothing is more common than for animals to take pleasure in practicing whatever instinct they follow at other times for some real good. How often do we see birds which fly easily gliding and sailing through the air obviously for pleasure.'' The cat plays with the captured mouse and the cormorant with the captured fish. The weaver-bird (Ploceus), when confined in a cage, amuses itself by neatly weaving blades of grass between the wires of its cage. Birds which habitually fight during the breeding-season are generally ready to fight at all times; and the males of the capercailzie sometimes hold their Balzen or leks at the usual place of assemblage during the autumn. J Hence it is not at all surprising that male birds should continue singing for their own amusement after the season for courtship is over. As shown in a previous chapter, singing is to a certain extent an art, and is much improved by practice. Birds can be taught various tunes, and even the unmelodious sparrow has learned to sing like a linnet. They acquire the song of their foster parents, and sometimes that of *D. Barrington, "Phil. Transact.," 1773, p. 262. Bechstein. " StubenvOgel," 1840, s. 4. f This is likewise the case with the water-ouzel; see Mr. Hepburn in the " Zoologist," 1845-46, p. 1068. J L. Lloyd, " Game Birds of Sweden," 1867, p. 25. Barrington, ibid, p. 264, Bechstein, ibid, s. 5. BIRDS. 421 their neighbors.* All the common songsters belong to the Order of Insessores, and their vocal organs are much more complex than those of most other birds; yet it is a singular fact that some of the Insessores, such as ravens, crows, and magpies, possess the proper apparatus,! though they never eing, and do not naturally modulate their voices to any great extent. Hunter asserts J that with the true songsters the muscles of the larynx are stronger in the males than in the females ; but with this slight exception there is no dif- ference in she vocal organs of the two sexes, although the males of most species sing so much better and more con- tinuously than the females. It is remarkable that only small birds properly sing. The Australian genus Menura, however, must be excepted; for the Menura Alberti, which is about the size of a half- grown turkey, not only mocks other birds, but " its own whistle is exceedingly beautiful and varied." The males congregate and form " corroborying^ places," where they sing, raising and spreading their tails like peacocks, and drooping their wings. It is also remarkable that birds which sing well are rarely decorated with brilliant colors or other ornaments. Of our British birds, excepting the bullfinch and goldfinch, the best songsters are plain- colored. The kingfisher, bee-eater, roller, hoopoe, wood- peckers, etc., utter harsh cries; and the brilliant birds of the tropics are hardly ever songsters. || Hence bright colors and the power of song seem to replace each other. We can perceive that if the plumage did not vary in brightness, or if bright colors were dangerous to the species, other means would be employed to charm the females; and melody of voice offers one such means. In some birds the vocal organs differ greatly in the two', * Bureau de la Malle gives a curious instance (" Annales des Sc. Nat.," 3d series, Zoolog., torn, x, p. 118) of some wild blackbirds in his garden in Paris, which, naturally learned a republican air from a caged bird. f Bishop, in "Todd's Cyclop, of Anat. and Phys.," vol. iv, p. 1496. J As stated by Barrington in " Philosoph. Transact.," 1773, p. 262. Gould, "Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, 1865, pp. 308-310. See also Mr. T. W. Wood in the " Student," April, 1870, p. 125. fl See remarks to this effect in Gould's ' Introduction to the Tro> chilidse," 1861, p. 22. 422 THE DESCENT OF MAN. In the Tefrao cupido (fig 39) the male lias two bare, orange-colored sacks, one on each side of the neck ; and these are largely inflated when the male, during the breeding-season, makes his curious hollow sound, audible at a great distance. Audubon proved that the sound was intimately connected with this apparatus (which reminds us of the air-sacks on each side of the mouth of cer- tain male frogs), for he found that the sound was much diminished when one of the sacks of a tame bird was pricked, and when both were pricked it BIRDS. 423 was altogether stopped. The female has "a some- what similar, though smaller naked space of skin on the neck ; but this is not capable of inflation."* The male of another kind of grouse (Tetrao urophasianus), while courting the female, has his " bare yellow oesophagus inflated to a prodigious size, fully half as large as the body;" and he then utters various grating, deep, hollow tones. With his neck-feathers erect, his wings lowered, and buzz- ing on the ground, and his long pointed tail spread out like a fan, he displays a variety of grotesque attitudes. The oesophagus of the female is not in any way remarkable, f It seems now well made out that the great throat-pouch of the European male bustard (Otis tar da), and of at least four other species, does not, as was formerly supposed, serve to hold water, but is connected with the utterance during the breeding-season of a peculiar sound resembling " oak."f A crow-like bird inhabiting South America, Cephalopterus ornatus (fig. 40), is called the umbrella-bird from its im- mense top-knot, formed of bare white quills surmounted by dark-blue plumes, which it can elevate into a great dome no less than five inches in diameter, covering the whole head. This bird has on its neck a long, thin, cylindrical, fleshy appendage, which is thickly clothed with scale-like blue feathers. It probably serves in part as an ornament, but likewise as a resounding apparatus; for Mr. Bates found that it is connected " with an unusual development of the trachea and vocal organs." It is dilated when the bird, utters its singularly deep, loud and long-sustained fluty *"The Sportsman and Naturalist in Canada," by Maj. W. Ross King, 1866, pp. 144-146. Mr. T. W. Wood gives in the " Student" (April, 1870, p. 116) an excellent account of the attitude and habits of this bird during its courtship. He states that the ear-tufts or neck-plumes are erected so that they meet over the crown of the head. See his drawing, fig. 39. f Richardson, "Fauna Bor. American: Birds," 1831, p. 359, Audu- bon, ibid, vol. iv, p. 507. \ The following papers have been lately written on this subject: Prof. A. Newton in the " Ibis," 1862, p. 107; Dr. Cullen, ibid, 1865, S145; Mr. Flower in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1865, p. 747; and Dr. urie in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1868, p. 471. In this latter paper an excellent figure is given of the male Australian bustard in full dis- play with the sack distended. It is a singular fact that the sack is not developed in all the males of the same species. 424 THE DESCENT OF MAN. note. The head-crest and neck-appendage are rudimentary in the female.* The vocal organs of various web-footed and wading birds are extraordinarily complex, and differ to a certain extent in the two sexes. In some cases the trachea is convoluted, Tig. 40. The Umbrella-bird or Cephalopterus ornatus, male (from Brehm). like a French horn, and is deeply embedded in the sternum. In the wild swan (Cygnus ferus) it is more deeply embedded in the adult male than in the adult female or * Bates, " The Naturalist on the Amazons," 1863, vol. ii, p. 284; Wallace, in " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1850, p. 206. A new species, with a still larger neck appendage ((J. penduliger), has lately been dis- covered, see "Ibis," voL i, p. 457. BIRDS. 425 young male. In the male Merganser the enlarged portion of the trachea is furnished with an additional pair of mus- cles.* In one of the ducks, however, namely, Anas pundata, the bony enlargement is only a little more devel- oped in the male than in the female, f But the meaning of these differences in the trachea of the two sexes of the Anatidse is not understood ; for the male is not always the more vociferous; thus with the common duck, the male hisses, while the female utters a loud quack. J In both sexes of one of the cranes (Grus virgo] the trachea pene- trates the sternum, but presents " certain sexual modifica- tions." In the male of the black stork there is also a well- marked sexual difference in the length and curvature of the bronchi. Highly important structures have, therefore, in bhese cases been modified according to sex. It is often difficult to conjecture whether the many strange cries and notes uttered by male birds during the breeding-season serve as a charm or merely as a call to the female. The soft cooing of the turtle-dove and of many pigeons, it may be presumed, pleases the female. When the female of the wild turkey utters her call in the morning, the male answers by a note which differs from the gobbling noise made, when with erected feathers, rustling wings and distended wattles, he puffs and struts before her. || The spel of the black-cock certainly serves as a call to the female, for it has been known to bring four or five females from a distance to a male under confinement; but as the black-cock continues his spel for hours during successive days, and in the case of the capercailzie ' ' with an agony of passion," we are led to suppose that the females which are present are thus charmed. 1' The voice of the common * Bishop, in Todd's " Cyclop, of Anat. and Phys.," vol. iv, p. 1499. f Prof. Newton, " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1871, p. 651. \ The spoonbill (Platalea) has its trachea convoluted into a figure of eight, and yet this bird (Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 763) is mute; but Mr. Blyth informs me that the convolutions are not constantly present, so that perhaps they are now tending toward abortion. " Elements of Comp. Anat.," by R. Wagner, Eng, translat., 1845, p. 111. With respect to the swan, as given above, Tarrell's "Hist, of British Birds," 3d edit, 1845, vol. iii, p. 193. I C. L. Bonaparte, quoted in the " Naturalist Library; Birds," vol. xiv, p. 126. ^[L. Lloyd, " The Game Birds of Sweden." etc., 1867, pp. 22, 81. 426 THE DESCENT OF MAN. rook is known to alter during the breeding-season, and is therefore in some way sexual.* But what shall we say about the harsh screams of, for instance, some kinds of macaws; have these birds as bad taste for musical sounds as they apparently have for color, judging by the inhar- monious contrast of their bright yellow and blue plumage? It is indeed possible that without any advantage being thus (gained, the loud voices of many male birds may be the ] result of the inherited effects of the continued use of their vocal organs when excited by the strong passions of love, jealousy and rage; but to this point we shall recur when we treat of quadrupeds. We have as yet spoken only of the voice, but the males of various birds practice, during their courtship, what may be called instrumental music. Peacocks and birds of paradise rattle their quills together. Turkey-cocks scrape their wings against the ground, and some kinds of grouse thus produce a buzzing sound. Another North American grouse, the Tetrao unibellus, when with, his tail erect, his ruffs displayed " he shows off his finery to the females who lie hid in the neighborhood,", drums by rapidly striking his wings together above his back, according to Mr. E. Haymond, and not, as Audubon thought, by striking them against his sides. The sound thus produced is compared by some to distant thunder and by others to the quick roll of a drum. The female never drums, " but flies directly to the place where the male is thus engaged. " The male of the Kali j -pheasant in the Himalayas, " often makes a sin- gular drumming noise with his wings, not unlike the sound produced by shaking a stiff piece of cloth." On the west coast of Africa the little black-weavers (Ploceus?) congre- gate in a small party on the bushes round a small open space and sing and glide through the air with quivering wings, ''which make a rapid whirring sound like a child's rattle." One bird after another thus performs for hours together but only during the courting-season. At this season, and at no other time, the males of certain night-jars (Caprimul- gus) make a strange booming noise with their wings. The various species of woodpeckers strike a sonorous branch with their beaks with so rapid a vibratory movement that * Jenner, " Pkilosoph. Transactions," 1824, p. 20. BIRDS. 427 " the head appears to be in two places at once." The sound thus produced is audible at a considerable distance, but cannot be described; and I feel sure that its source would never be conjectured by any one hearing it for the first time. As this jarring sound is made chiefly during the breeding-season, it has been considered as a love-song; but it is perhaps more strictly a love-call. The female, when driven from her nest, has been observed thus to call her mate, who answered in the same manner and soon appeared. Lastly, the male hoopoe ( Upupa epops] combines vocal and instrumental music; for during the breeding-season this bird, as Mr. Swinhoe observed, first draws in air and then taps the end of its beak perpendicularly down against a stone or the trunk of a tree, " when the breath being forced down the tubular, bill produces the correct sound." If the beak is not thus struck against some object the sound is quite different. Air is at the same time swallowed and the oesophagus thus becomes much swollen; and this probably acts as a resonator, not only with the hoopoe but with pigeons and other birds. * In the foregoing cases sounds are made by the aid of structures already present and otherwise necessary; but in the following cases certain feathers have been specially modified for the express purpose of producing sounds. The dramming, bleating, neighing or thundering noise (as expressed by different observers) made by the common snipe (Scolopax gallinago) must have surprised every one who has ever heard it. This bird, during the pairing- season, flies to "perhaps a thousand feet in height," and after zig-zagging about for a time descends to the earth in *For the foregoing facts see, on birds of paradise, " Brehm, ' Thierleben," Band iii, s. 325. On grouse, Richardson, "Fauna Bor. Americ.: Birds," pp. 343, 359; Maj. W. Ross King, "The Sportsman in Canada," 1866, p. 156; Mr. Raymond, in Prof. Cox's "Geol. Survey of Indiana," p. 227; Audubon, "American Ornith- olog. Biograph.," vol. i, p. 216. On the Kali j -pheasant, Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 533. On the weavers, "Livingstone's Expedition to the Zambesi," 1865, p. 425. On woodpeckers, Mac- gillivray, " Hist, of British Birds," vol. iii, 1840, pp. 84, 88, 89, 95. On the hoopoe, Mr. Swinhoe, in " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," June 23, 1863, 1871, p. 348. On the night-jar, Audubon, ibid, vol. ii, p. 255, and "American Naturalist," 1873, p. 672. The English night- jar likewise makes in tb*> spring a curious noise during its rapid flight. 428 THE DESCENT OF MAN. a curved line with outspread tail and quivering pinions and surprising velocity. The sound is emitted only during this rapid descent. No one was able to explain the cause until M. Meves observed that on each side of the tail the outer feathers are peculiarly formed (fig. 41), having a Fig. 41. Outer tail-feather of Scolopax gallinago (from " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1858.) stiff saber-shaped shaft with the oblique barbs of unusual length, the outer webs being strongly bound together. He found that by blowing on these feathers, or by fastening them to a long, thin stick and waving them rapidly through the air, he could reproduce the drumming noise made by the living bird. Both sexes are furnished with these feath- ers, but they are generally larger in the male than in the female and emit a deeper note. In some species, as in 8. frenata (fig. 42), four feathers, and in S. javensis (fig. 43), no less than eight on each side of the tail are greatly Pig. 42. Outer tail-feather of Scolopax frenata. Pig. 43. Outer tail-feather of Scolopax Javensis. modified. Different tones are emitted by the feathers of the different species when waved through the air; and the Scolopax Wilsonii of the United States makes a switching noise while descending rapidly to the earth.* In the male of the (Jliamcepetes unicolor (a large galli- naceous bird of America), the first primary wing-feather is arched toward the tip and is much more attenuated than in *See M. Meves' interesting paper in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1858, p. 199. For the habits of the snipe, Macgillivray, "Hist. British Birds," vol. iv, p. 371. For the American snipe, Capt. Blakiston, " Ibis," vol. v, 1863, p. 131. BIRDS. 429 the female. In an allied bird, the Penelope mgra, Mr. Salvin observed a male, which, while it flew downward " with outstretched wings, gave forth a kind of crashing, rushing noise," like the falling of a tree.* The male alone of one of the Indian bustards (Sypheotides auritus) has its primary wing-feathers greatly acuminated; and the male of an allied species is known to make a humming noise while courting the female, f In a widely different group of birds, namely, humming-birds, the males alone of certain kinds have either the shafts of their primary wing feathers broadly dilated, or the webs ab- ruptly excised toward the extrem- ity. The male, for instance, of SelaspJiorus platycercus, when adult, has the first primary wing- leather (hg. 44) tllUS excised. phvrus platycercus (from While flying from flower to flower SS*S?vKffi, Yo P he makes " a shrill, almost whist- figure, corresponding feather ling noise ;"J but it did not appear ' to Mr. Salvin that the noise was intentionally made. Lastly, in several species of a sub-genus of Pipra or Manakin, the males, as described by Mr. Sclater, have their secondary wing-feathers modified in a still more remarkable manner. In the brilliantly-colored P. deliciosa the first three secondaries are thick-stemmed and curved toward the body; in the fourth and fifth (fig. 45, a) the change is greater; and in the sixth and seventh (b, c) the shaft "is thickened to an extraordinary degree, forming a solid horny lump." The barbs also are greatly changed in shape, in comparison with the corresponding feathers (d, e, /) in the female. Even the bones of the wing, which support these singular feathers in the male, are said by Mr. Fraser to be much thickened. These little birds make an extraordinary noise, the first " sharp note being not unlike the crack of a whip." *Mr. Salvin, in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1867, p. 160. I am much indebted to this distinguished ornithologist for sketches of the feathers of the Chamaepetes and for other information. f Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. iii, pp. 618, 621. JGould, "Introduction to the Trochilidae," 1861, p. 49. Salvin, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc ," 1867, p. 160. SclatQr, in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1860, p. 90, and in "Ibis," voj, iv, 1862, p. 175. Also Saivin, in ' Ibis," 1860, p. 37. 430 THE DESCENT OF MAN. The diversity of the sounds, both vocal and instrumental, made by the males of many birds during the breeding- Fig. 45. Secondary wing-feathers of Pipra deliciosa (from Mr. Sclater, in "Proo. Zool. Soc.," 1800. The three upper feathers, a, 6, c, from the male; the three lower corresponding feathers, d, ,/, from the female. a and d, fifth secondary wing-feather of male and female, upper surface. b and . O. Klliot, in " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1869, p. 589. 8 NHwr,K' ' Pterylography," edited by P. L. Sclater. Ray Soc., 1067, ( . &. BIRDS. 443 t??allatores, the sexes of which resemble each other, but in which the summer and winter plumage differ slightly in color. The difference,, however, in these cases is so small that it can hardly be an advantage to them; and it may, perhaps, be attributed to the direct action of the different conditions to which the birds are exposed during the two seasons. Thirdly, there are many other birds the sexes of which are alike, but which are widely different in their summer and winter plumage. Fourthly, there are birds the sexes of which differ from each other in color; but the females, though moulting twice, retain the same colors throughout the year, while the males undergo a change of color, sometimes a great one, as with certain bustards. Fifthly and lastly, there are birds the sexes of which differ from each other in both their summer and winter plumage; but the male undergoes a greater amount of change at each recurrent season than the female of which the ruff ( Ma- chetes pugnax) offers a good instance. With respect to the cause or purpose of the differences in color between the summer and winter plumage, this may in some instances, as with the ptarmigan,* serve during both seasons as a protection. When the difference between the two plumages is slight it may perhaps be attributed, as already remarked, to the direct action of the conditions of life. But with many birds there can hardly be a doubt that the summer plumage is ornamental, even when both sexes are alike. We may conclude that this is the case with many herons, egrets, etc., for they acquire their beautiful plumes only during the breeding-season. Moreover, such plumes, top-knots, etc., though possessed by both sexe^ are occasionally a little more developed in the male than in the female; and they resemble the plumes and ornaments possessed by the males alone of other birds. It is also known that confinement, by affecting the reproductive system of male birds, frequently checks the development of their secondary sexual characters, but has no immediate influence on any other characters; and I am informed by Mr. Bart- * The brown mottled summer plumage of the ptarmigan is of aa much importance to it, as a protection, as the white winter plumage; for in Scandinavia during the spring, when the snow has disap- nred, this bird is known to suffer greatly from birds of prey, before AS acquired its summer dress; see Wilhelm. von Wright, b Llcyd, Game Birds of Sweden," 1807, p. 125, 444 THE DESCENT OF MAN. lett that eight or nine specimens of the Knot (Tnnga canutus) retained their unadorned winter plumage in the Zoological Gardens throughout the year, from which fact we may infer that the summer plumage, though common to both sexes, partakes of the nature of the exclusively masculine plumage of many other birds.* From the foregoing facts, more especially from neither sex of certain birds changing color during either annual moult, or changing so slightly that the change can hardly be of any service to them, and from the females of other species moulting twice yet retaining the same color through- out the year, we may conclude that the habit of annually moulting twice has not been acquired in order that the- male should assume an ornamental character during the breeding-season; but that the double moult, having been originally acquired for some distinct purpose, has subse- quently been taken advantage of in certain cases for gaining a nuptial plumage. It appears at first sight a surprising circumstance that some closely-allied species should regularly undergo a double annual moult, and others only a single one. The ptarmigan, for instance, moults twice or even thrice in the jrear, and the black-cock only once; some of the splen- didly colored honey-suckers (Nectariniae) of India and some sub-genera of obscurely colored pipits (Anthus) have a double, while others have only a single annual moult, f But the gradations in the manner of moulting, which are known to occur with various birds, show us how species or whole groups might have originally acquired their double annual moult, or having once gained the habit, have again lost it. With certain bus- tards and plovers the vernal moult is far from complete, some feathers being renewed, and some changed in color. There is also reason to believe that with certain * In regard to the previous statements on moulting, see, on snipes, etc., Macgillivray, " Hist. Brit. Birds," vol. iv, p. 371; on Glareolae, curlews and bustards, Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. iii, pp. 615, 630, 683; on Totanus, ibid, p. 700; on the plumes of herons, ibid, p. 738, and Macgillivray, vol. iv, pp. 435, 444, and Mr. Stafford Allen, in the "Ibis," vol. v, 1863, p. 33. | On the moulting of the ptarmigan, see Gould's " Birds of Great Britain." On the I^oney-suckers, Jerdon, "Bjrds of India," vol. i, pp. 359, 865, 869. On the moulting qf ^thue, roe Blorth, in " Ibis,'' 1867. p. 32. BIRDS. 445 bustards and rail-like birds, which properly undergo a double moult, some of the older males retain their nuptial plumage throughout the year. A few highly modified feathers may merely be added during the spring to the plumage, as occurs with the disk-formed tail-feathers of certain drongos (Bhringa) in India, and with the elon- gated feathers on the back, neck, and crest of certain herons. By such steps as these, the vernal moult might be rendered more and more complete, until a perfect double moult was acquired. Some of the birds of paradise retain their nuptial feathers throughout the year, and thus have only a single moult ; others cast them directly after the breeding-season, and thus have a double moult; and others again cast them at this season during the first year, but not afterward; so that these latter species are interme- diate in their manner of moulting. There is also a great difference with many birds in the length of time during which the two annual plumages are retained ; so that the one might come to be retained for the whole year, and the other completely lost. Thus in the spring Machetes pugnax retains his ruff for barely two months. In Natal the male widow-bird (Chera progne) acquires his fine plumage and long tail-feathers in December or Janu- ary, and loses them in March ; so that they are retained only for about three months. Most species which undergo a double moult keep their ornamental feathers for about six months. The male, however, of the wild Gallus ban- kiva retains his neck-hackles for nine or ten months; and when these are cast off the underlying black feathers on the neck are fully exposed to view. But with the domesti- cated descendant of this species the neck-hackles of the male are immediately replaced by new ones ; so that we here see, as to part of the plumage, a double moult changed under domestication into a single moult.* * For the foregoing statements in regard to partial moults, and on old males retaining their nuptial plumage, see Jerdon, on bustards and plovers, in " Birds of India," vol. iii, pp. 617, 637, 709, 711. Also Blyth in " Land and Water," 1867, p. 84. On the moulting of Paradisea, see an interesting article by Dr. W. Marshall, " Archives Neerlandaises," torn, vi, 1871. On the Vidua, " Ibis," vol. iii, 1861, p. 133. On the Drongo-shrikes, Jerdon, ibid, vol. i, p. 435. On the vernal moult of the Herodias bubulcus, Mr. S. S. Allen, in " Ibis," 1863, p. 33. On Gallus liankiva, Blyth, in " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. i, 1848, p. 455; see also on this subject, my " Vari- ation of Animals under Domestication," vol. i, p. 236. 446 THE DESCENT OF MAN. The common drake (Anas boschas) after the breeding- season, is well known to lose his male plumage for a period of three months, during which time he assumes that of the female. The male pin-tail duck (Anas acutd) loses his plumage for the shorter period of six weeks or two months ; and Montagu remarks that " this double moult within so short a time is a most extraordinary cir- cumstance that seems to bid defiance to all human reason- ing. " But the believer in the gradual modification of species will be far from feeling surprise at finding grada- tions of all kinds. If the male pin-tail were to acquire his new plumage within a still shorter period the new male feathers would almost necessarily be mingled with the old, and both with some proper to the female; and this appar- ently is the case with the male of a not distantly allied bird, namely, the Merganser serrator, for the males are said to " undergo a change of plumage which assimilates them in some measure to the female." By a little further acceleration in the process the double moult would be com- pletely lost.* Some male birds, as before stated, become more brightly colored in the spring, not by a vernal moult, but either by an actual change of color in the feathers or by their obscurely colored deciduary margins being shed. Changes of color thus caused may last for a longer or shorter time. In the Pelecanus onocrotalus a beautiful rosy tint with lemon-colored marks on the breast overspreads the whole plumage in the spring; but these tints, as Mr. Sclater states, " do not last Igng, disappearing generally in about six weeks or two months after they have been attained." Certain finches shed the margins of their feathers in the spring and then become brighter colored, while other finches undergo no such change. Thus the Fringilla tristis of the U nited States (as well as many other Ameri- can species) exhibits its bright colors only when the winter is past, while our goldfinch, which exactly represents this bird in habits, and our siskin which represents it still more closely in structure, undergo no such annual change. But a difference of this kind in the plumage of allied species *See Macgillivray, "Hist. British Birds," (vol. v, pp. 34, 70, 223) on the moulting of the Anatklae, with quotations from Waterton and Montagu. Also Yarrell, " Hist, of British Birds," vol. iii, p. 243. BIRDS. 447 is not surprising, for with the common linnet, which belongs to the same family, the crimson forehead and breast are displayed only during the summer in England, while in Madeira these colors are retained throughout the year. * Display by Male Birds of Tlieir Plumage. Ornaments of all kinds, whether permanently or temporarily gained, are sedulously displayed by the males, and apparently serve to excite, attract or fascinate the females. But the males will sometimes display their ornaments when, not in the presence of the females, as occasionally occurs with grouse at their balz-places, and as may be noticed with the peacock; this latter bird, however, evidently wishes for a spectator of some kind, and, as I have often seen, will show off his finery before poultry, or even pigs, f All naturalists who have closely attended to the habits of birds, whether in a state of nature or under confinement, are unani- mously of opinion that the males take delight in displaying their beauty. Audubon frequently speaks of the male as endeavoring in various ways to charm the female. Mr. Gould, after describing some peculiarities in a male humming-bird, says lie lias no doubt that it has the power of displaying them to the greatest advantage before the female. Dr. JerdonJ insists that the beautiful plumage of the male serves " to fascinate and attract the female." Mr. Bartlett, at the Zoological Gardens, expressed himself to me in the strongest terms to the same effect. It must be a grand sight in the forests of India ' ' to come suddenly on twenty or thirty pea-fowl, the males displaying their gorgeous trains, and strutting about in all the pomp of pride before the gratified females/' The wild turkey-cock erects his glittering plumage, expands his finely-zoned tail and barred wing-feathers, and altogether, with his crimson On the pelican, see Sclater, in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1868, p. 265. he American finches, see Audubon, " Ornith. Biography," vol. i, 174, 221, and Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. ii, p. 383. On the On the American finches, see Audubon, " Ornith. Biography," vol. i, pp. 174, 221, and Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. ii, p. 383. On the Fringilla canndbina of Madeira, Mr. E. Vernon Harcourt, " Ibis," vol. v, 1863, p. 230. fSee also " Ornamental Poultry," by Rev. E. S. Dixon, 1848, p. 8. | " Birds of India," introduct., vol. i, p. 24, on the peacock, vol. iii, p. 507. See Gould's " Introduction to the Trochilid*," 1861, pp. 15, 111. 448 THE DESCENT OF MAN. and blue wattles, makes a superb, though, to our eyes, grotesque appearance. Similar facts have already been given with respect to grouse of various kinds. Turning to another order. The male Rupicola crocea (fig. 50) is one of the most beautiful birds in the world, being of a splendid orange, with some of the feathers curiously truncated and Fig. 50. Rupicola crocea, male (T. W. Wood). plumose. The female is brownish -green, shaded with red, and has a much smaller crest. Sir R. Schomburgk has described their courtship; he found one of their meeting- places where ten males and two females were present. The space was from four to five feet in diameter, and appeared to have been cleared of every blade of grass and smoothed as if by human hands. A^U^le^" was capering te the BIRDS. 449 apparent delight of several others. Now spreading its wings, throwing up its head, or opening its tail like a fan; now strutting about with a hopping gait until tired, when it gabbled some kind of note, and was relieved by another. Thus three of them successively took the field, and then, with self -approbation, withdrew to rest." The Indians, in order to obtain their skins, wait at one of the meeting- places till the birds are eagerly engaged in dancing, and then are able to kill with their poisoned arrows four or five males, one after the other.* AVith birds of paradise a dozen or more full-plumaged males congregate in a tree to hold a dancing-party, as it is called by the natives; and here they fly about, raise their wings, elevate their exquisite plumes, and make them vibrate, and the whole tree seems, as Mr. Wallace remarks, to be filled with waving plumes. When thus engaged they become so absorbed that a skillful archer may shoot nearly the whole party. These birds, when kept in confinement in the Malay Archipelago, are said to take much care in keeping their feathers clean; often spreading them out, examining them, and removing every speck of dirt. One observer, who kept several pairs alive, did not doubt that the display of the male was intended to please the female, f The gold and Amherst pheasants during their courtship not only expand and raise their splendid frills but twist them, as I have myself seen, obliquely toward the female on whichever side she may be standing, obviously in order that a large surface may be displayed before her.]; They likewise turn their beautiful tails and tail-coverts a little toward the same side. Mr. Bartlett has observed a male Polyplectron (fig. 51) in the act of courtship, and has shown me a specimen stuffed in the attitude then assumed. The tail and wing feathers of this bird are ornamented with beautiful ocelli, like those on the peacock's train. * " Journal of R. Geograph. Soc.," vol. x, 1840, p. 236. f" Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. xiii, 1854, p. 157; also Wallace, ibid, vol. xx, 1857, p. 412, and "The Malay Archipelago," vol. ii, 1869, p. 252. Also Dr. Bennett, as quoted by Brehni, " Thier- leben/'^B. iii, s. 326. JMr.'T. W. Wood has given ("The Student," April, 1870, p. 115) a full account of this manner of display by the gold pheasant and by the Japanese pheasant, Ph. versicolor; and he calls it the lateral or one-sided display. 4:50 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Now when the peacock displays himself he expands and Fig. 51. Polyplectron chinquis, male (T. W. Wuod). erects his tail transversely to his body, for he stands in front of the female, and has to show olf at the same time BIRDS. 451 his rich blue throat and breast. But the breast of the Poly- plectron is obscurely colored, and the ocelli are not con- fined to the tail-feathers. Consequently the Polyplectron does not stand in front of the female; but he erects and expands his tail-feathers a little obliquely, lowering the ex- panded wing on the same side and raising that on the opposite side. In this attitude the ocelli over the whole body are exposed at the same time before the eyes of the admiring female in one grand bespangled expanse. To whichever side she may turn the expanded wings and the obliquely-held tail are turned toward her. The male Trag- opan pheasant acts in nearly the same manner, for he raises the feathers of the body, though not the wing itself, on the side which is opposite to the female, and which would otherwise be concealed, so that nearly all the beautifully spotted feathers are exhibited at the same time. The Argus pheasant affords a much more remarkable case. The immensely developed secondary wing-feathers are confined to the male; and each is ornamented with a row of from twenty to twenty-three ocelli above an inch in diameter. These feathers are also elegantly marked with oblique stripes and rows of spots of a dark color, like those on the skin of a tiger and leopard combined. These beau- tiful ornaments are hidden until the male shows himself off before the female. He then erects his tail and expands his wing-feathers into a great, almost upright, circular fan or shield, which is carried in front of the body. The neck and head are held on one side, so that they are concealed by the fan; but the bird in order to see the female, before whom he is displaying himself, sometimes pushes his head between two of the long wing-feathers (as Mr. Bartlett has seen), and then presents a grotesque appearance. This must be a frequent habit with the bird in a state of nature, for Mr. Bartlett and his son, on examining some perfect skins sent from the east, found a place between two of the .feathers which was much frayed, as if the head had here frequently been pushed through. Mr. Wood thinks that the male can also peep at the female on one side beyond the margin of the fan. The 'ocelli on the wing-feathers are wonderful objects, for they are so shaded that, as the Duke of Argyll remarks,* * "The Reign of Law," 1867, p. 203. 452 THE DESCENT OF MAN. they stand out like balls lying loosely within sockets. When Fig. 52. Side view of male Argus pheasant, while displaying before the female. Observed and sketched from nature by Mr. T. W. Wood. I looked at the specimen in the British Museum, which is mounted with the wings expanded and trailing downward, BIRDS. 453 I was, however, greatly disappointed, for the ocelli appeared flat, or even concave. But Mr. Gould soon made the case clear to me, for he held the feathers erect, in the position in which they would naturally be displayed, and now, from the light shining on them from above, each ocellus at once resembled the ornament called a ball and socket. These feathers have been shown to several artists, and all have expressed their admiration at the perfect shading. It may well be asked, could such artistically shaded ornaments have been formed by means of sexual selection ? But it will be convenient to defer giving an answer to this ques- tion until we treat in the next chapter of the principle of gradation. The foregoing remarks relate to the secondary wing- feathers, but the primary wing-feathers, which in most gallinaceous birds are uniformly colored, are in the Argus pheasant equally wonderful. They are of a soft brown tint with numerous dark spots, each of which consists of two or three black dots with a surrounding dark zone. But the chief ornament is a space parallel to the dark-blue shaft, which in outline forms a perfect second feather lying within the true feather. This inner part is colored of a lighter chestnut, and is thickly dotted with minute white points. I have shown this feather to several persons, and many have admired it even more than the ball and socket feath- ers, and have declared that it was more like a work of art than of nature. Now these feathers are quite hidden on all ordinary occasions, but are fully displayed, together with the long secondary feathers, when they are all ex- panded together so as to form the great fan or shield. The case of the male Argus pheasant is eminently inter- esting, because it affords good evidence that the most re- fined beauty may serve as a sexual charm, and for no other purpose. We must conclude that this is the case, as the secondary and primary wing-feathers are not at all dis- played, and the ball and socket ornaments are not exhibited in mil perfection until the male assumes the attitude of courtship. The Argus pheasant does not possess brilliant colors, so that his success in love appears to depend on the great size of his plumes and on the elaboration of the most elegant patterns. Many will declare that it is utterly in- credible that a female bird should be able to appreciate fine ehading and exquisite patterns. It is undoubtedly a mar- 454 THE DESCENT OF MAN. velous fact that she should possess this almost human degree of taste. He who thinks that he can safely gauge the dis- crimination and taste of the lower animals" may deny that the female Argus pheasant can appreciate such refined beauty; but he will then be compelled to admit that the extraordinary attitudes assumed by the male during the act of courtship, by which the wonderful beauty of his plum- age is fully displayed, are purposeless; and this is a conclu- sion which I for one will never admit. Although so many pheasants and allied gallinaceous birds carefully display their plumage before the females, it is remarkable, as Mr. Bartlett informs me, that this is not the case with the dull- colored eared and cheer pheasants (Crossoptilon auritum and Phasianus wallichii); so that these birds seem conscious that they have little beauty to display. Mr. Bartlett has never seen the males of either of these species fighting together, though he has not had such good opportunities for observing the cheer as the eared pheasant. Mr. Jenner Weir, also, finds that all male birds with rich or strongly-characterized plumage are more quarrelsome than the dull-colored species belonging to the same groups. The goldfinch, for instance, is far more pugnacious than the linnet, and the blackbird than the thrush. Those birds which undergo a seasonal change of plumage likewise become much more pugnacious at the period when they are most gayly ornamented. No doubt the males of some obscurely colored birds fight desperately together, but it appears that when sexual selection has been highly influential, and has given bright colors to the males of any species, it has also very often given a strong tendency to pugnacity. We shall meet with nearly analo- gous cases when we treat of mammals. On the other hand, with birds the power of song and brilliant colors have rarely been both acquired by the males of the same species; but in this case the advantage gained would have been the same, namely, success in charming the female. Neverthe- less it must be owned that the males of several brilliantly colored birds have had their feathers specially modified for the sake of producing instrumental music, though the beauty of this cannot be compared, at least according to our taste, with that of the vocal music of many songsters. We will now turn to male birds which are not orna- mented in any high degree, but which nevertheless display BIRDS. 455 during their courtship whatever attractions they may pos- sess. These cases are in some respects more curious than the foregoing, and have been but little noticed. I owe the following facts to Mr. Weir, who has long kept confined birds of many kinds, including all the British Fringillidae and Emberizidae. The facts have been selected from a large body of valuable notes kindly sent me by him. The bullfinch makes his advances in front of the female, and then puffs out his breast, so that many more of the crim- son feathers are seen at once than otherwise would be the case. At the same time he twists and bows his black tail from side to side in a ludicrous manner. The male chaffinch also stands in front of the female, thus show- ing his red breast and " blue bell," as the fan- ciers call his head ; the wings at the same time being slightly expanded, with the pure white bands on the shoul- ders thus rendered conspicuous. The common linnet dis- tends his rosy breast, slightly expands his brown wings and tail, so as to make the best of them by exhibiting their white edgings. We must, however, be cautious in conclud- ing that the wings are spread out solely for display, as some birds do so whose wings are not beautiful. This is the case with the domestic cock, but it is always the wing on the side opposite to the female which is expanded, and at the same time scraped on the ground. The male gold- finch behaves differently from all other finches; his wings are beautiful, the shoulders being black, with the dark- tipped wing-feathers spotted with white and edged with golden yellow. When he courts the female he sways his body from side to side, and quickly turns his slightly expanded wings first to one side then to the other with a golden flashing effect. Mr. Weir informs me that no other British finch turns thus from side to side during his court- ship, not even the closely allied male siskin, for he would not thus add to his beauty. Most of the British buntings are plain-colored birds; but in the spring the feathers on the head of the male reed-bunting (Emberiza schoeniculus) acquire a fine black color by the abrasion of the dusky tips; and these are erected during the act of courtship. Mr. Weir has kept two species of Amadina from Australia; the A. castanotis is a very small and chastely colored finch, with a dark tail, white rump and jet-black upper tail coverts, each of the 456 THE DESCENT OF MAN. "\atter being marked with three large conspicuous oval spots of Avhite.* This species when courting the female slightly spreads out and vibrates these parti-colored tail coverts in a very peculiar manner. The male Amadina Latliami behaves very differently, exhibiting before the female his brilliant!/ spotted breast, scarlet rump and scarlet upper tail coverts. I may here add from Dr. Jerdon that the Indian bulbul (Pycnonotus licBinorrhous) has its under tail coverts of a crimson color, and these, it might be thought, could never be well exhibited; but the bird " when excited often spreads them out laterally so that they can be seen even from above, "f The crimson under tail coverts of some other birds, as with one of the woodpeckers, Picus major, can be seen without any such display. The common pigeon has iridescent feathers on the breast, and every one must have seen how the male inflates his breast while courting the female, thus showing them off to the best advantage. One of the beautiful bronze- winged pigeons of Australia (Ocypliaps lophotes) behaves, as described to me by Mr. AVeir, very differently. The male while standing before the female lowers his head almost to the ground, spreads out and raises his tail and half expands his wings. He then alternately and slowly raises and depresses his body, so that the iridescent metallic feathers are all seen at once and glitter in the sun. Sufficient facts have now been given to show with what care male birds display their various charms, and this they do with the utmost skill. While preening their feathers they have frequent opportunities .for admiring themselves and of studying how best to exhibit their beauty. But as all the males of the same species display themselves in exactly the same manner it appears that actions, at first perhaps intentional, have become instinctive. If so, we ought not to accuse birds of conscious vanity; yet when we see a peacock strutting about with expanded and quivering tail feathers he seems the very emblem of pride and vanity. The various ornaments possessed by the males are cer- tainly of the highest importance to them, for in some cases * For the description of these birds see Gould's " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, 1865, p. 417. f " Buds of India," vol. ii, p, 96. BIRDS. 45? they have been acquired at the expense of greatly impeded powers of flight or of running. The African night-jar (Cosmetornis), which during the pairing-season has one of its primary wing- feathers developed into a streamer of very great length, is thereby much retarded in its flight, although at other times remarkable for its swiftness. The "unwieldy size" of the secondary wing-feathers of the male Argus pheasant is said "almost entirely to deprive the bird of flight." The fine plumes of male birds of para- dise trouble them during a high wind. The extremely long tail-feathers of the male widow-birds (Vidua) of South- ern Africa render " their flight heavy;" but as soon as these are cast off they fly as well as the females. As birds always breed when food is abundant, the males probably do not suffer much inconvenience in searching for food from their impeded powers of movement; but there can hardly be a doubt that they must be much more liable to be struck down by birds of prey. Nor can we doubt that the long train of the peacock and the long tail and wing feathers of the Argus pheasant must render them an easier prey to any prowling tiger-cat than would otherwise be the case. Even the bright colors of many male birds cannot fail to make them conspicuous to their enemies of all kinds. Hence, as Mr. Gould has remarked, it probably is that such birds are generally of a shy disposition, as if conscious that their beauty was a source of danger, and are much more difficult to discover or approach than the somber colored and com- paratively tame females or than the young and as yet unadorned males.* It is a more curious fact that the males of some birds which are provided with special weapons for battle, and which in a state of nature are so pugnacious that they often kill each other, suffer from possessing certain orna- ments. Cock-fighters trim the hackles and cut off the combs and gills of their cocks; and the birds are then said to be dubbed. An undubbed bird, as Mr. Tegetmeier *0n the Cosraetornis, see Livingstone's "Expedition to the Zam- besi," 1865, p. 66. On the Argus pheasant, Jardine's " Nat. Hist. Lib.: Birds," vol. xiv, p. 167. On birds of paradise, Lesson, quoted by Brehffl, " Thierleben," B. iii, s. 325. On the widow-bird, Bar- row's "Travels in Africa," vol. i, p. 243, and "Ibis," vol. iii, 1861, p. 133. Mr. Gould, on the shyness of male birds, "Hand-book to Birds of Australia," vol. i, 1865, pp. 210, 457. 458 THE DESCENT OF MAN. insists, "is at a fearful disadvantage; the comb and gills offer an easy hold to his adversary's beak, and as a cock always strikes where he holds, when once he has seized his foe, he has him entirely in his power. Even supposing that the bird is not killed, the loss of blood suffered by an undubbed cock is much greater than that sustained by one that has been trimmed."* Young turkey-cocks in fighting always seize hold of each other's wattles; and I presume that the old birds fight in the same manner. It may per- haps be objected that the comb and wattles are not orna- mental and cannot be of service to the birds in this way; but even to our eyes the beauty of the glossy black Spanish cock is much enhanced by his white face and crimson comb; and no one who has ever seen the splended blue wattles of the male Tragopan pheasant distended in court- ship can for a moment doubt that beauty is the object gained. From the foregoing facts we clearly see that the plumes and other ornaments of the males must be of the highest importance to them; and we further see that beauty is even sometimes more important than success in battle. *Tegetnieier, " The Poultry Book," 1866, p. 139. BIRDS. 459 CHAPTER XIV. BIRDS continued. Choice exerted by the female Length of courtship Unpaired birds Mental qualities and taste for the beautiful Preference or antipathy shown by the female for particular males Variability of birds Variations sometimes abrupt Laws of variation Formation of ocelli Gradations of character Case of peacock, Argus pheasant and Urosticte. WHEN the sexes differ in beauty or in the power of sing- ing, or in producing what I have called instrumental music, it is almost invariably the male who surpasses the female. These qualities, as we have just seen, are evidently of high importance to the male. When they are gained for only a part of the year it is always before the breeding- season. It is the male alone who elaborately displays his varied attractions, and often performs strange antics on the ground or in the air, in the presence of the female. Each male drives away, or, if he can, kills his rivals. Hence we may conclude that it is the object of the male to induce the female to pair with him, and for this purpose he tries to excite or charm her in various Avays; and this is the opinion of all those who have carefully studied the habits of living birds. But there remains a question which has an all-important bearing on sexual selection, namely, does every male of the same species excite and attract the female equally? Or does she exert a choice and prefer certain males? This latter question can be answered in the affirmative by much direct and indirect evidence. It is far more difficult to decide what qualities determine the choice of the females; but here again we have some direct and indirect evidence that it is to a large extent the external attractions of the male; though no doubt his vigor, cour- age, and other mental qualities come into play. We will begin with the indirect evidence. 460 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Length of Courtship). The lengthened period during which both sexes of certain birds meet day after day at an appointed place probably depends partly on the courtship being a prolonged affair, and partly on reiteration in the act of pairing. Thus in Germany and Scandinavia the balzing or leks of the black-cocks last from the middle of March all through April into May. As many as forty or fifty or even more birds congregate at the leks; and the same place is often frequented during successive years. The lek of the capercailzie lasts from the end of March to the middle or even end of May. In North America "the partridge dances " of the Tetrao phasianellns " last for a month or more." Other kinds of grouse, both in North America and Eastern Siberia,* follow nearly the same habits. The fowlers discover the hillocks where the ruffs congregate by the grass being trampled bare, and this shows that the same spot is long frequented. The Indians of Guiana are well acquainted with the cleared arenas, where they expect to find the beautiful cocks of the rock; and the natives of New Guinea know the trees where from ten to twenty male birds of paradise in full plumage congre- gate. In this latter case it is not expressly stated that the females meet on the same trees, but the hunters, if not specially asked, would probably not mention their presence, as their skins are valueless. Small parties of an African weaver (Ploceus) congregate, during the breeding-season, and perform for hours their graceful evolutions. Large numbers of the solitary snipe (Scolopax major] assemble during dusk in a morass; and the same place is frequented for the same purpose during successive years; here they may be seen running about "like so many large rats/' puffing out their feathers, flapping their wings, and uttering the strangest cries, f *Nordman describes ("Bull. Soc. Imp. des Nat. Moscou," 1861, torn, xxxiv, p. 264) the balzen of Tetrao urogalloides in Amur Land. He estimated the number of birds assembled at above a hundred, not counting the females, which lie hid in the surrounding bushes. The noises uttered differ from those of T. urogallus. \ With respect to the assemblages of the above-named grouse, see Brehm, "Thierleben," B. iv, s. 350; also L. Lloyd, "Game Birds of Sweden," 1867, pp. 19, 78. Richardson, " Fauna Bor. Americana.: Birds," p. 362. References in regard to the assemblages of other birds have already been given. On Paradisea, see Wallace, in "Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. xx, 1857, p. 412. On the snipe, Lloyd, ibid, p. 221. BIRDS. 461 Some of the above birds the black-cock, capercailzie, pheasant-grouse, ruff, solitary snipe, and perhaps others are, as is believed, polygamists. With such birds it might have been thought that the stronger males would simply have driven away the weaker, and then at once have taken possession of as many females as possible; but if it be indis- pensable for the male to excite or please the female, we can understand the length of the courtship and the congrega- tion of so many individuals of both sexes at the same spot. Certain strictly monogamous species likewise hold nuptial assemblages; this seems to be the case in Scandinavia with one of the ptarmigans, and their leks last from the middle of March to the middle of May. In Australia the lyre- birds (Menura superba) forms ie small round hillocks/' and the M. Alberti scratches for itself shallow holes, or, as they are called by the natives, corroborying places, where it is believed both sexes assemble. The meetings of the M. superba are sometimes very large; and an account has lately been published * by a traveler, who heard in a valley beneath him, thickly covered with scrub, "a din which completely astonished " him ; on crawling onward he beheld, to his amazement, about one hundred and fifty of the magnificent lyre-cocks " ranged in order of battle and fighting with indescribable fury." The bowers of the bower-birds are the resort of both sexes during the breed- ing-season; and "here the males meet and contend with each other for the favors of the female, and here the latter assemble and coquet with the males." With two of the genera, the same bower is resorted to during many years.f The common magpie (Corvus pica. Linn.), as I have been informed by the Kev. W. Darwin Fox, used to assemble from all parts of Delamere forest, in order to celebrate the "great magpie marriage." Some years ago these birds abounded in extraordinary numbers, so that ,a gamekeeper killed in one morning nineteen males, and another killed by a single shot seven birds at roost together. They then had the habit of assembling very early in the spring at particular spots, where they could be seen in * Qudled by Mr. T, W Wood in the " Student," April, 1870, p. 125. f Gould, " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, pp. 300, 308, 448, 451. On the ptarmigan, above alluded to, see Lloyd, ibid, p. 139. 462 THE DESCENT OF MAN. flocks, chattering, sometimes fighting, bustling and flying about the trees. The whole affair was evidently consid- ered by the birds as one of the highest importance. Shortly after the meeting they all separated, and were then observed by Mr. Fox and others to be paired for the season. In any district in which a species does not exist in large numbers great assemblages cannot, of course, be held, and the same species may have different habits in dif- ferent countries. For example, I have heard of only one instance, from Mr. Wedderburn, of a regular assemblage of black game in Scotland, yet these assemblages are so well known in Germany and Scandinavia that they have received special names. Unpaired Birds. From the facts now given, we may conclude that the courtship of birds belonging to widely different groups is often a prolonged, delicate, and trouble- some affair. There is even reason to suspect, improbable as this will at first appear, that some males and females of the same species, inhabiting the same district, do not always please each other, and consequently do not pair. Many accounts have been published of either the male or female of a pair having been shot and quickly replaced by another. This has been observed more frequently with the magpie than with any other bird, owing, perhaps, to its conspicuous appearance and nest. The illustrious Jenner states that in Wiltshire one of a pair was daily shot no less than seven times successively, " but all to no pur- pose, for the remaining magpie soon found another mate;" and the last pair reared their young. A new partner is generally found on the succeeding day ; but Mr. Thomp- son gives the case of one being replaced on the evening of the same day. Even after the eggs are hatched, if one of the old birds is destroyed a mate will often be found; this occurred after an interval of two days in a case recently observed by one of Sir J. Lubbock's keepers.* The first and most obvious conjecture is that male magpies must be much more numerous than females; and that in the above cases, as well as in many others which could be given, the males alone had been killed. This apparently holds *0n magpies, Jenner, in "Phil. Transact.," 1824, p. 21. Macgil- livray, " Hist. British Birds," vol. i, p. 670. Thompson, in "Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. viii, 1842, p 494. BIRDS. 463 good in some instances, for the gamekeepers in Delamere forest assured Mr. Fox that the magpies and carrion-crows which they formerly killed in succession in large numbers near their nests were all males; and they accounted for this fact by the males being easily killed while bringing food to the sitting females. Macgillivray, however, gives, on the authority of an excellent observer, an instance of three mag- pies successively killed on the same nest, which were all females; and another case of six magpies successively killed while sitting on the same eggs, which renders it probable that most of them were females; though, as I hear from Mr. Fox, the male will sit on the eggs when the female is killed. Sir' J. Lubbock's gamekeeper has repeatedly shot, but how often he could not say, one of a pair of jays (Garrulus ylamlftrius), and has never failed shortly afterward to find the survivor rematched. Mr. Fox, Mr. F. Bond and others have shot one of a pair of carrion-crows (Corvus corotie), but the nest was soon again tenanted by a pair. These birds are rather common; but the peregrine-falcon (Falcopere- grinus) is rare, yet Mr. Thompson states that in Ireland " if either an old male or female be killed in the breeding- season (not an uncommon circumstance) another mate is found within a very few days, so that the eyries, not- withstanding such casualties, are sure to turn out their complement of young." Mr. Jenner "Weir has known the same thing with the peregrine-falcons at Beachy Head. The same observer informs me that three kestrels (Falco tinnunculiis), all males, were killed, one after the other, while attending the same nest; two of these were in mature plumage, but the third was in the plumage of the previous year. Even with the rare golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos}, Mr. Birkbeck was assured by a trustworthy gamekeeper in Scotland, that if one is killed another is soon found. So with the white owl (Stnx flammea) " the survivor readily found a mate, and the mischief went on." White of Selborne, who gives the case of the owl, adds that he knew a man, who, from believing that partridges when paired were disturbed by the males fighting, used to shoot hem; and though he had widoAved the same female several times, she always soon found a fresh partner. This same naturalist ordered the sparrows, which deprived the house-martins of their nests, to be shot; but the one which 464 THE DESCENT OF MAN. was left, "be it cock or hen, presently procured a mate, and so for several times following." I could add analogous cases relating to the chaffinch, nightingale and redstart. With respect to the latter bird (Phcenicura ruticilla), a writer expresses much surprise how the sitting female could so soon have given effectual notice that she was a widow, for the species was not common in the neighborhood. Mr. Jenner Weir has mentioned to me a nearly similar case: at Blackheath he never sees or hears the note of the wild bullfinch, yet when one of his caged males has died a wild one in the course of a few days has generally come and perched near the widowed female, whose call-note is not loud. I will give only one other fact, on the authority of this same observer; one of a pair of starlings (Sturmis vulyari*) was shot in the morning; by noon a new mate was found; this was again shot, but before night the pair was complete; so that the disconsolate widow or widower was thrice consoled during the same day. Mr. Engleheart also informs me that he used during several years to shoot one of a pair of starlings which built in a hole in a house at Blackheath; but the loss was always immediately repaired. During one season he kept an account, and found that he had shot thirty-five birds from the same nest; these consisted of both males and females, but in what proportion he could not say; nevertheless, after all this destruction, a brood was reared.* These facts well deserve attention. How is it that there are birds enough ready to replace immediately a lost mate of either sex? Magpies, jays, carrion-crows, partridges, and some other birds are always seen during the spring in pairs, and never by themselves; and these offer at first sight the most perplexing cases. But birds of the same sex, although of course not truly paired, sometimes live in pairs or in small parties, as is known to be the case with pigeons and partridges. Birds also sometimes live in triplets, as has been observed with starlings, carrion-crows, parrots and partridges. With partridges two females have been *0n the peregrine falcon, see Thompson, "Nat. Hist, of Ireland- Birds," vol. i, 1849, p. 39. On owls, sparrows and partridges, see White, "Nat. Hist, of Selborne," edit, of 1825, vol. i, p. 139. On the Phoenicura, see London's " Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. vii, 1834, p. 245. Brehin (" Thierleben," B. iv, s. 991) also alludes to cases of birds thrice mated during the same day. BIRDS. 465 known to live with one male, and two males with one female. In all such cases it is probable that the union would be easily broken; and one of the three would readily pair with a widow or widower. The males of certain birds may occasionally be heard pouring forth their love-song long after the proper time, showing that they have either lost or never gained a mate. Deatli from accident or dis- ease of one of a pair would leave the other free and single; and there is reason to believe that female birds during the breeding-season are especially liable to premature death. Again, birds which have had their nests destroyed, or barren pairs, or retarded individuals, would easily be induced to desert their mates, and would probably be glad to take what share they could of the pleasures and duties of rearing offspring, although not their own.* Such con- tingencies as these probably explain most of the foregoing cases, f Nevertheless, it is a strange fact that within the same district, during the height of the breeding-season, there should be so many males and females always ready to repair the loss of a mated bird. Why do not such spare birds immediately pair together? Have we not some reason to suspect, and the suspicion has occurred to Mr. Jenner Weir, that, as the courtship of birds appears to be in many * See White (" Nat. Hist, of Selborne," 1825, vol. i, p. 140) on the existence, early in the season, of small coveys of male partridges, of which fact I have heard other instances. See Jenner, on the retarded state of the generative organs in certain birds, in "Phil. Transact." 1824. In regard to birds living in triplets, I owe to Mr. Jenner Weir the cases of the starlings and parrots, and to Mr. Fox, of partridges; on carrion-crows, see the " Field," 1868, p. 415. On various male birds singing after the proper period, see Rev. L. Jenyns, "Ob- servations in Natural History," 1846, p. 87. f-The following case has been given ("The Times," Aug. 6, 1868) by the Rev. F. 0. Morris, on the authority of the Hon. and Rev. O. W. Forester. " The gamekeeper here found a hawk's nest this year with five young ones in it. He took four and killed them, but left one with its wings clipped as a decoy to destroy the old ones by. They were both shot next day in the act of feeding the young one, and the keeper thought it was done with. The next day he came again and found two other charitable hawks who had come with an adopted feeling to succor the orphan. These two he killed and then left thejiest. On returning afterward he found two more charitable individuals on the same errand of mercy. One of these he killed; the other he also shot but could not find. No more came on the lika fruitless errand." 466 THE DESCENT OF MAN. cases prolonged and tedious, so it occasionally happens that certain males and females do not succeed, during the proper season, in exciting each other's love, and consequently do not pair? This suspicion will appear somewhat less improba- ble after we have seen what strong antipathies and prefer- ences female birds occasionally evince toward particular males. Mental Qualities of Birds and Tfietr Taste for the Beautiful. Before we further discuss the question whether the females select the more attractive males or accept the first whom they may encounter, it will be advisable briefly to consider the mental powers of birds. Their reason is generally, and perhaps justly, ranked as low; yet some facts could be given* leading to an opposite conclusion. Low powers of reasoning, however, are compatible, as we see with mankind, with strong affections, acute perception, and a taste for the beautiful; and it is with these latter qualities that we are here concerned. It has often been said that parrots become so deeply attached to each other that when one dies the other pines for a long time; but Mr. Jenner Weir thinks that with most birds the strength of their affection has been much exaggerated. Neverthe- less, when one of a pair in a state of nature has been shot, the survivor has been heard for days afterward uttering a plaintive call; and Mr. St. John gives various facts proving the attachment of mated birds, f Mr. Bennett relates}; that in China after a drake of the beautiful mandarin teal had been stolen the duck remained disconsolate, though sedu- lously courted by another mandarin drake, who displayed * I am indebted to Prof. Newton for the following passage from Mr. Adam's "Travels of a Naturalist," 1870, p. 278. Speaking of Japanese nut-hatches in confinement, he says: " Instead of the more yielding fruit of the yew, which is the usual food of the nut-hatch of Japan, at one time I substituted hard hazel-nuts. As the bird was unable to crack them, he placed them one by one in his water- glass, evidently with the notion that they would in time become softer an interesting proof of intelligence on the part of these birds." f'A Tour in Sutherlandshire," vol. i, 1849, p. 185. Dr. Buller says ("Birds of New Zealand," 1872, p. 56) that a male King Lory was killed; and the female "fretted and moped, refused her food, and died of a broken heart." J " Wanderings in New South Wales," vol. ii, 1834, p. 62. BIRDS. 467 before her all his charms. After an interval of three weeks the stolen drake was recovered, and instantly the pair recognized each other with extreme joy. On the other hand starlings, as we have seen, may be consoled thrice in the same day for the loss of their mates. Pigeons have such excellent local memories that they have been known to return to their former homes after an interval of nine months, yet, as I hear from Mr. Harrison Weir, if a pair which naturally would remain mated for life be separated for a few weeks during the winter, and afterward matched with other birds, the two, when brought together again, rarely, if ever, recognize each other. Birds sometimes exhibit benevolent feelings; they will feed the deserted young ones even of distinct species, but this perhaps ought to be considered as a mistaken instinct. They will feed, as shown in an earlier part of this work, adult birds of their own species which have become blind. Mr. Buxton gives a curious account of a parrot which took care of a frost-bitten and crippled bird of a distinct species, cleansed her feathers and defended her from the attacks of the other parrots which roamed freely about his garden. It is a still more curious fact that these birds apparently evince some sympathy for the pleasures of their fellows. When a pair of cockatoos made a nest in an acacia tree " it was ridiculous to see the extravagant interest taken in the matter by the others of the same species. These parrots also evinced unbounded curiosity and clearly had " the idea of property and possession/'* They have good mem- ories, for in the Zoological Gardens they have plainly recognized their former masters after an interval of some months. Birds possess acute powers of observation. Every mated bird, of course, recognizes its fellow. Audubon states that a certain number of mocking-thrushes (Mimus polyglottus) remain all the year round in Louisiana, while others migrate to the Eastern States; these latter on their return are instantly recognized and always attacked by their southern brethren. Birds under confinement distinguish different persons, as is proved by the strong and permanent antipathy or affection which they show without any appar- * " Acclimatization of Parrots," by C. Buxton, M. P. "Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," Nov., 1868, p. "381. 468 THB DESCENT OF MAN. ent cause toward certain individuals. -I have heard of numerous instances with jays, partridges, canaries, and especially bullfinches. Mr. Hussey has described in how extraordinary a manner a tamed partridge recognized everybody; and its likes and dislikes were very strong. This bird seemed "fond of gay colors, and no new gown or cap could be put on without catching his attention."* Mr. Hewitt has described the habits of some ducks (recently descended from wild birds) which at the approach of a strange dog or cat would rush headlong into the water and exhaust themselves in their attempts to escape; but they knew Mr. Hewitt's own dogs and cats so well that they would lie down and bask in the sun close to them. They always moved away from a strange man, and so they would from the lady who attended them if she made any great change in her dress. Audubon relates that he reared and tamed a wild turkey which always ran away from any strange dog; this bird escaped into the woods, and some days afterward Audubon saw, as he thought, a wild turkey and made his dog chase it; but to his astonishment the bird did not run away, and the dog when he came up did not attack the bird, for they mutually recognized each other as old friends, f Mr. Jenner Weir is convinced that birds pay particular attention to the colors of other birds, sometimes out of jealousy and sometimes as a sign of kinship. Thus he turned a reed-bunting (Eniberiza sclmniculus), which had acquired its black head-dress, into his aviary, and the new- comer was not noticed by any bird except by a bullfinch, which is likewise black-headed. This bullfinch was a very quiet bird, and had never before quarreled with any of its comrades, including another reed-bunting, which had not as yet become black-headed ; but the reed-bunting with a black head was so unmercifully treated that it had to be removed. Spiza cyanea, during the breeding-season, is of a bright blue color; and though generally peaceable, it attacked 8. ciris, which has only the head blue, and com- pletely scalped the unfortunate bird. Mr. Weir was also * " The Zoologist," 1847-1848, p. 1602. f Hewitt on wild ducks, " Journal of Horticulture," Jan. 13, 1863, ?. 39. Audubon on the wild turkey, "Ornith. Biography," vol. i, p. 4. On the mocking-thrush, ibid, vol. i, p. 110. BIRDS. 469 obliged to turn out a robin, as it fiercely attacked all the birds in his aviary with any red in their plumage, but no other kinds; it actually killed a red-brested crossbill and nearly killed a goldfinch. On the other hand, he has observed that some birds, when first introduced, fly toward the species which resemble them most in color, and settle by their sides. As male birds display their fine plumage and other orna- ments with so much care before the females, it is obvi- ously probable that these appreciate the beauty of their suitors. It is, however, difficult to obtain direct evidence of their capacity to appreciate beauty. When birds gaze at themselves in a looking-glass (of which many instances have been recorded) we cannot feel sure that it is not from jealousy of a supposed rival, though this is not the conclu- sion of some observers. In other cases it is difficult to dis- tinguish between mere curiosity and admiration. It is perhaps the former feeling which, as stated by Lord Lil- ford,* attracts the ruff toward any bright object, so that, in the Ionian Islands, " it will dart down to a bright-col- ored handkerchief, regardless of repeated shots." The common lark is drawn down from the sky, and is caught in large numbers, by a small mirror made to move and glitter in the sun. Is it admiration or curiosity which leads the magpie, raven, and some other birds to steal and secrete bright objects, such as silver articles or jewels? Mr. Gould states that certain humming-birds decorate the outsides of their nests " with the utmost taste ; they instinctively fasten thereon beautiful pieces of flat lichen, the larger pieces in the middle, and the smaller on the part attached to the branch. Now and then a pretty feather is intertwined or fastened to the outer sides, the stem being always so placed that the feather stands out beyond the. surface." The best evidence, however, of a taste for the beautiful is afforded by the three genera of Australian bower-birds already mentioned. Their bowers (see fig. 46), where the sexes congregate and play strange antics, are variously constructed, but what most concerns us is, that they are decorated by the several species in a different manner". The satin bower-bird collects gayly-colored arti- cles, such as the blue tail-feathers of paroquets, bleached The "Ibis," vol. ii, I860, p. 344. 470 THE DESCENT OF MAN. bones and shells, which it sticks between the twigs 01 arranges at the entrance. Mr. Gould found in one bowel a neatly- worked stone tomahawk and a slip of blue cotton, evidently procured from a native encampment. These objects are continually rearranged, and carried about by the birds while at play. The bower of the spotted bower- bird " is beautifully lined with tall grasses, so disposed that the heads nearly meet, and the decorations are very profuse." Round stones are used to keep the grass-stems in their proper places and to make divergent paths leading to the bower. The stones and shells are often brought from a great distance. The regent bird, as described by Mr. Ramsay, ornaments its short bower with bleached land- shells belonging to five or six species, and with "berries of various colors, blue, red, and black, which give it when fresh a very pretty appearance. Besides these there were several newly-picked leaves and young shoots of a pinkish co_lor, the whole showing a decided taste for the beautiful." Well may Mr. Gould say that " these highly decorated halls of assembly must be regarded as the most wonderful instances of bird-architecture yet discovered;" and the taste, as we see, of the several species certainly differs.* Preference for Particular Males by the Females. Having made these preliminary remarks on the discrimination and taste of birds, I will give all the facts known to me which bear on the preference shown by the female for particular males. It is certain that distinct species of birds occasion- ally pair in a state of nature and produce hybrids. Many instances could be given; thus Macgillivray relates how a male blackbird and female thrush " fell in love with each other," and produced offspring.! Several years ago eight- een cases had been recorded of the occurrence in Great Britain of hybrids between the black grouse and pheasant;^ but most of these cases may perhaps be accounted for by solitary birds not finding one of their own species to pair with. With other birds, as Mr. Jenner Weir has reason to * On the ornamental nests of humming-birds, Gould, "Introduc- tion to the Trochilidffi, 1861, p. 19. On the bower-birds, Gould, " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," 1865, vol. i, pp. 444-461. Ramsay, in the "Ibis," 1867, p. 456. f " Hist, of British Birds," vol. ii, p. 92. J" Zoologist," 1858-1854, p. 3940. BIRDS. 471 believe, hybrids are sometimes the result of the casual inter- course of birds building in close proximity. But these remarks do not apply to the many recorded instances of tamed or domestic birds, belonging to distinct species, which have become absolutely fascinated with each other, although living with their own species. Thus Waterton* states that out of a flock of twenty-three Canada geese, a female paired with a solitary Bernicle gander, although so different in appearance and size; and they produced hybrid offspring. A male wigeon (Mareca penelope) living with females of the same species has been known to pair with a pintail duck, Querquedula acuta. Lloyd describes the re- markable attachment between a shield-drake (Tadorna vulpanser) and a common duck. Many additional instances could be given; and the Rev. E. S. Dixon remarks that " those who have kept many different species of geese together well know what unaccountable attachments they are frequently forming, and that they are quite as likely to pair and rear young with individuals of a race (species) apparently the most alien to themselves as with their own stock." The Rev. W. D. Fox informs me that he possessed at the isame time a pair of Chinese geese (Anser Cygnoides) and a common gander with three geese. The two lots kept quite separate, until the Chinese gander seduced one of the common geese to live with him. Moreover, of the young birds hatched from the eggs of the common geese, only four were pure, the other eighteen proving hybrids; so that the Chinese gander seems to have had prepotent charms over the common gander. I will give only one other case: Mr. Hewitt states that a wild duck, reared in captivity, " after breeding a couple of seasons with her own mallard, at once shook him off on my placing a male pintail on the water. It was evidently a case of love at first sight, for she swam about the new-comer caressingly, though he appeared evidently alarmed and averse to her overtures of * Waterton, "Essays on Nat. Hist.," 2d series, pp. 42, 117. For the following statements see on the wigeon, Loudon's " Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. ix, p. 616. L. Lloyd, " Scandinavian Adventures," vol. i, 1854, p'. 452. Dixon, " Ornamental and Domestic Poultry," p. 137; Hewitt, in "Journal of Horticulture," Jan. 13, 1863, p. 40; Bech- stein, " Stubenvogel," 1840, s. 230. Mr. Jenner Weir has lately given me an analogous case with ducks of two species, 472 THE DESCENT OF MAN. affection. From that hour she forgot her old partner. Winter passed by, and the next spring the pintail seemed to have become a convert to her blandishments, for they nested and produed seven or eight young ones." What the charm may have been in these several cases, beyond mere novelty, we cannot even conjecture. Color, however, sometimes comes into play; for in order to raise hybrids from the siskin (Fringilla spinus) and the canary, it is much the best plan, according to Bechstein, to place birds of the same tint together. Mr. Jenner Weir turned a female canary into his aviary, where there were male linnets, goldfinches, siskins, greenfinches, chaffinches and other birds, in order to see which she would choose; but there never was any doubt, and the greenfinch carried the day. They paired and produced hybrid offspring. The fact of the female preferring to pair with one male rather than with another of the same species is not so likely to excite attention as when this occurs, as we have just seen, between distinct species. The former cases can best be observed with domesticated or confined birds; but these are often pampered by high feeding, and sometimes have their instincts vitiated to an extreme degree. Of this latter fact I could give sufficient proofs with pigeons, and espe- cially with fowls, but they cannot be here related. Vitiated instincts may also account for some of the hybrid unions above mentioned; but in many of these cases the birds were allowed to range freely over large ponds, and there is no reason to suppose that they were unnaturally stimulated by high feeding. With respect to birds in a state of nature, the first and most obvious supposition which will occur to every one is that the female at the proper season accepts the first male whom she may encounter; but she has at least the oppor- tunity for exerting a choice, as she is almost invariably pursued by many males. Audubon and we must remem- ber that he spent a long life in prowling about the forests of the United States and observing the birds does not doubt that the female deliberately chooses her mate; thus, speaking of a woodpecker, he says the hen is followed by half a dozen gay suitors, who continue performing strange antics, "until a marked preference is shown for one." The female of the red-winged starling (Agelcsus pJiceniccus) is likewise pursued by several males j " until, becoming BIRDS. 473 fatigued, she alights, receives their addresses, and soon makes a choice." He describes also how several male night-jars repeatedly plunge through the air with astonish- ing rapidity, suddenly turning, and thus making a singular noise; " but no sooner has the female made her choice than the other males are driven away/' With one of the vultures (Catliartes aura) of the United States, parties of eight, ten, or more males and females assemble on fallen logs > "exhibiting the strongest desire to please mutually," and after many caresses each male leads off his partner on the wing. Audubon likewise carefully observed the wild flocks of Canada geese (Anser canadensis), and gives a graphic description of their love antics; he says that the birds which had been previously mated "renewed their courtship as early as the month of January, while the others would be contending or coquetting for hours every day, until all seemed satisfied with the choice they had made, after which, although they remained together, am person could easily perceive that they were careful to keep in pairs. I have observed also tlmt the older the birds the shorter were the preliminaries of their courtship. The bachelors and old maids, whether in regret or not caring to be disturbed by the bustle, quietly moved aside and lay down at some distance from the rest/'* Many similar statements with respect to other birds could be cited from this same observer. Turning now to domesticated and confined birds, I will commence by giving what little I have learned respecting the courtship of f owls c I have recieved long letters on this subject from Messrs. Hewitt and Tegetmeier, and almost an essay from the late Mr. Brent. It will be admitted by every one that these gentlemen, so well known from their published works, are careful and experienced observers. They do not believe that the females prefer certain males on account of the beauty of their plumage; but some allow- ance must be made for the artificial state under which these birds have long been kept. Mr. Tegetmeier is con- vinced that a gamecock, though disfigured by being dubbed and with his hackles trimmed, would be accepted as readily as a male retaining all his natural ornaments. Mr, Brent, * Audubon, " Ornitholog. Biography," voL i, pp. 191, 849j vol. iL pp. 42, 275; vol. iii. jk a 474 THE DESCENT OF MAN. however, admits that the heauty of the male probably aids in exciting the female; and her acquiescence is necessary. Mr c Hewitt is convinced that the union is by no means left to mere chance, for the female almost invariably prefers the most vigorous, defiant and mettlesome male; hence it is almost useless, as he remarks, " to attempt true breeding if a gamecock in good health and condition runs the local- ity, for almost every hen on leaving the roosting-place will resort to the gamecock, even though that bird may not actually drive away the male of her own variety." Under ordinary circumstances the males and females of the fowl eeem to come to a mutual understanding by means of cer- tain gestures, described to me by Mr. Brent. But hens will often avoid the officious attentions of young males. Old hens and hens of a pugnacious disposition, as the same writer informs me, dislike strange males, and will not yield until well beaten into compliance. Ferguson, how- ever, describes how a quarrelsome hen was subdued by the gentle courtship of a shanghai cock.* There is reason to believe that pigeons of both sexes prefer pairing with birds of the same breed; and dove-cote pigeons dislike all the highly improved breeds, f Mr. Har- rison Weir has lately heard from a trustworthy observer who keeps blue pigeons that these drive away all other colored varieties, such as white, red and yellow; and from another observer, that a female dun carrier could not, after repeated trials, be matched with a black male, but imme- diately paired with a dun. Again, Mr. Tegetmeier had a female blue turbit that obstinately refused to pair with two males of the same breed, which were successively shut up with her for weeks; but on being let out she would have immediately accepted the first blue dragon that offered. As she was a valuable bird, she was then shut up for many weeks with a silver (*. e., very pale blue) male, and at last mated with him. Nevertheless, as a general rule, color appears to have little influence on the pairing of pigeons. Mr. Tegetmeier, at my request, stained some of his birds with magenta, but they were not much noticed by the others. f "I voiii, " Rare and Prize Poultry," 1854, p. 27. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," p. 108. BIRD 8. 475 Female pigeons occasionally feel a strong antipathy toward certain males, without any assignable cause. Thus MM. Boitard and Corbie,, whose experience extended over forty- five years, state: " Quand une femelle eprouve de 1'antip- athie pour un male avec lequel on veut 1'accoupler, malgre tous les feux de 1'amour, malgre 1'alpiste et le cheinevis dont on la nourrit pour augmenter son ardeur, malgre un em- prisounement de six mois et mme d'un an, elle refuse con- stamment ses caresses; les avances empressees, les agaceries, les tournoiemens, les tendres roucoulemens, rien ne peut lui plaire ni Pemouvoir ; gonflee, boudeuse, blottie dans un coin de sa prison, elle n'en sort que pour boire et manger, ou pour repousser avec une espece de rage des caresses devenues trop pressantes.*' * On the other hand, Mr. Harrison Weir has himself observed and has heard from several breeders, that a female pigeon will occasionally take a strong 'fancy for a particular male, and will desert her own mate for him, Some females, according to another experienced observer, Riedel,f are of a profligate disposi- tion, and prefer almost any stranger to their own mate. Some amorous males, called by our English fanciers " gay birds," are so successful in their gallantries that, as Mr. H. Weir informs me, they must be shut up on account of the mischief which they cause. Wild turkeys in the United States, according to Audu- bon, " sometimes pay their addresses to the domesticated females, and are generally received by them with great pleasure." So that these females apparently prefer the wild to their own males. J Here is a more curious case^ Sir E. Heron during many years kept an account of the habits of the pea-fowl, which he bred in large numbers. He states that '' the hens have frequently great preference to a particular peacock. They were all so fond of an old pied cock that one year, when he was confined, though still in view, they were constantly assembled close to the trellised-walls of his prison, and would * Boitard and Corbie, "Les Pigeons, etc.," 1824, p. 12. Prosper Lucas ("Traite de 1'Hered. Nat.," torn, ii, 1850, p. 296) has himself observed nearly similar facts with pigeons. f"Die Taubenzucht,'-' 1824, s. 86, J "Ornithological Biography," vol. i, p. 13. See to the same effect. Dr. Bryant, in "Allen's Mammals and Birds of Florida," p. 476 THE DESCENT OF MAN. not suffer a japanned peacock to touch them. On his being let out in the autumn, the oldest of the hens instantly courted him and was successful in her courtship. The next year he was shut up in a stable, and then the hens all courted his rival."* This rival was a japanned or black- winged peacock, to our eyes a more beautiful bird than the common kind. Lichtenstein, who was a good observer and had excellent opportunities of observation at the Cape of Good Hope, assured Rudolphi that the female widow -bird (Chera progne) disowns the male when robbed of the long tail feathers with which he is ornamented during the breeding- season. I presume that this observation must have been made on birds under confinement, f Here is an analogous case: Dr. Jaeger, J director of the Zoological Gardens of Vienna, states that a male silver-pheasant who had been triumphant over all other males and was the accepted lover of the females had his ornamental plumage spoiled. He was then immediately superseded by a rival who got the upper hand and afterward led the flock. * It is a remarkable fact, as showing how important cojor is in the courtship of birds, that Mr. Boardman, a well- known collector and observer of birds for many years in the Northern United States, has never in his large experi- ence seen an albino paired with another bird; yet he has had opportunities of observing many albinos belonging to several species. It can hardly be maintained that albinos in a state of nature are incapable of breeding, as they can be raised with the greatest facility under confinement. It appears, therefore, that we must attribute the fact that they do not pair to their rejection by their normally colored comrades. Female birds not only exert a choice, but in some few *"Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1835, p. 54. The japanned peacock is con- sidered by Mr. Sclater as a distinct species, and has been named Pavo nigripennis; but the evidence seems to me to show that it is only a variety. fRudolphi, " Beytrage ziir Anthropologie," 1812, s. 184. j " Die Darwin'sche Theorie, und ihre Stellung zu Moral und Religion," 1869, s. 59. SThis statement is given by Mr. A. Leith Adams, in his "Field and Forest K*mbles," 1878>" p. 76, wad awrds with hie owji BIRDS. 477 cases they court the male, or even fight together for his possession. Sir E. Heron states that with peafowl the first advances are always made by the female; something of the same kind takes place, according to Audubon, with the older females of the wild turkey. With the capercailzie, the females flit round the male while he is parading at one of the places of assemblage and solicit his attention.* We have seen that a tame wild duck seduced an unwilling pin- tail drake after a long courtship. Mr. Bartlett believes that the Lophophoms, like many other gallinaceous birds, is naturally polygamous, but two females cannot be placed in the same cage with a male as they fight so much together. The following instance of rivalry is more sur- prising as it relates to bullfinches, which usually pair for life. Mr. Jenner Weir introduced a dull-colored and ugly female into his aviary and she immediately attacked another mated female so unmercifully that the latter had to be separated. The new female did all the courtship, and was at last successful, for she paired with the male; but after a time ^he met with a just retribution, for, ceas- ing to be pugnacious, she was replaced by the old female, and the male then deserted his new and returned to his old love. In all ordinary cases the male is so eager that he will accept any female, and does not, as far as we can judge, prefer one to the other ; but, as we shall hereafter see, exceptions to this rule apparently occur in some few groups. With domesticated birds I have heard of only one case of males showing any preference for certain females, namely, that of the domestic cock, who, according to the high authority of Mr. Hewitt, prefers the younger to the older hens. On the other hand, in effecting hybrid unions between the male pheasant and common hens, Mr. Hewitt is convinced that the pheasant invariably prefers the older birds. He does not appear to be in the least influenced by their color; but " is most capricious in his attachments;" f from some inexplicable cause he shows the most determined *In regard to peafowl, see Sir R. Heron, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1835, p.-54, and the Rev. E. S. Dixon, "Ornamental Poultry," 1848, p. 8. For the turkey, Audubon, ibid, p. 4. For the capercailzie, Llo 165. yd, " Game Birds of Sweden," 1867, p. 23. fMr. Hewitt, quoted in " Tegetmeier's Poultry Book " 1866. 478 THE DESCENT OF MAN. aversion to certain hens, which no care on the part of the breeder can overcome. Mr. Hewitt informs me that some hens are quite unattractive even to the males of their own species, so that they may be kept with several cocks*during a whole season, and not one egg out of forty or fifty will prove fertile. On the other hand, with the long-tailed duck (Harelda glacialis], " it has been remarked," says M. Ekstrom, " that certain females are much more courted than the rest. Frequently, indeed, one sees an individual surrounded by six or eight amorous males." Whether this statement is credible, I know not ; but the native sportsmen shoot these females in order to stuff them as decoys.* With respect to female birds feeling a preference for particular males we must bear in mind that we can judge of choice being exerted only by analogy = If an inhabitant of another planet were to behold a number of young rustics at a fair courting a pretty girl and quarreling about her, like birds at one of their places of assemblage, he would, by the eagerness of the wooers to please her and to display their finery, infer that she had thfc power of choice. Now with birds the evidence stands thus; they have acute powers of observation, and they seem to have some taste for the beautiful both in color and sound. It is certain that the females occasionally exhibit, from unknown causes, the strongest antipathies and preferences for par- ticular males. When the sexes differ in color or in other ornaments the males with rare exceptions are the more decorated, either permanently or temporarily during the breeding-season. They sedulously display their various ornaments, exert their voices, and perform strange antics in the presence of the females. Even well-armed males, who, it might be thought, would altogether depend for success on the law of battle, are in most cases highly ornamented ; and their ornaments have been acquired at the expense of some loss of power. In other cases ornaments have been acquired at the cost of increased risk from birds and beasts of prey. With various species many individuals of both sexes congregate at the same spot, and their courtship is a prolonged affair. There is even reason to suspect that tb> males and females within the same district do not always succeed in pleasing each other and pairing. *Quoted in Lloyd's "Game Birds of Sweden," p. 345. BIRDS, 479 What then are we to conclude from these facts and con- siderations? Does the male parade his charms with so much pomp and rivalry for no purpose? Are we not justi- fied in believing that the female exerts a choice, and that she receives the addresses of the male who pleases her most? It is not probable that she consciously deliberates; but she is most excited or attracted by the most beautiful, or melodious, or gallant males. Nor need it be supposed that the female studies each stripe or spot of color ; that the peahen, for instance, admires each detail in the gorgeous train of the peacock she is probably struck only by the general effect. Nevertheless, after hearing how carefully the male Argus pheasant displays his elegant primary wing- feathers and erects his ocellated plumes in the right posi- tion for their full effect; or again, how the male goldfinch alternately displays his gold-bespangled wings, we ought not to feel too sure that the female does not attend to each detail of beauty. We can judge, as already remarked, of choice being exerted, only from analogy; and the mental powers of birds do not differ fundamentally from ours. From these various considerations we may conclude that the pairing of birds is not left to chance; but that those males, which are best able by their various charms to please or excite the female, are under ordinary circumstances accepted. If this be admitted, there is not much difficulty in understanding how male birds have gradually acquired their ornamental characters. All animals present individ- ual differences, and as man can modify his domesticated birds by selecting the individuals which appear to him the most beautiful, so the habitual or even occasional preference by the female of the more attractive males would almost certainly lead to their modification; and such modifications might in the course of time be augmented to almost any extent, compatible with the existence of the species. Variability of Birds, and Especially of Their Secondary Sexual Characters. Variability and inheritance are the foundations for the work of selection. That domesticated birds have varied greatly, their variations being inherited, is certain. That birds in a state of nature have been modi- fied into distinct races is now universally admitted. * Vari- * According to Dr. Blasius ("Ibis," vol. ii, 1860, p. 297), there are 425 indubitable species of birds which breed in Europe, besides sixty 480 THE DESCENT OF MAN, ations may be divided into two classes; those which appea; to our ignorance to arise spontaneously, and those which are directly related to the surrounding conditions, so that all or nearly, all the individuals of the same species are similarly modified. Cases of the hitter kind have recently been observed with care by Mr. J. A. Allen,* who shows that in the United States many species of birds gradually become more strongly colored in proceeding southward, and more lightly colored in proceeding westward to the arid plains of the interior. Both sexes seem generally to be affected in a like manner, but sometimes one sex more than the other. This result is not incompatible with the belief that the colors of birds are mainly due to the accumulation of successive variations through sexual selection ; for even after the sexes have been greatly differentiated, climate might produce an equal effect on both sexes, or a greater effect on one sex than on the other, owing to some consti- tutional difference. Individual differences between the members of the same species are admitted by every one to occur under a state of nature. Sudden and strongly marked variations are rare ; forms, which are frequently regarded as distinct species. Of the latter, Blasius thinks that only ten are really doubtful and that the other fifty ought to be united with their nearest allies; but this shows that there must be a considerable amount of variation with some of our European birds. It is also an unsettled point with naturalists, whether several North American birds ought to be ranked as specifically distinct from the corresponding European species. So again many North American forms which until lately were named as distinct species, are now considered to be local races. *" Mammals and Birds of East Florida," also an "Ornithological Reconnaissance of Kansas, etc." Noth withstanding the influence of climate on the colors of birds, it is difficult to account for the dull or dark tints of almost all the species inhabiting certain countries, for instance, the Galapagos Islands under the equator, the wide, tem- perate plains of Patagonia, and, as it appears, Egypt (see Mr. Harts- horne in the "American Naturalist," 1873, p. 747). These countries are open and afford little shelter to birds; but it seems doubtfuV whether the absence of brightly colored species can be explained on the principle of protection, for on the Pampas, which are equally open, though covered by green grass, and where the birds would be equally exposed to danger, many brilliant and conspicuously colored species are common. I have sometimes speculated whether the pre- vailing dull tints of the scenery in the above-named countries may not have affected the appreciation of bright colors by the birds inhab- iting them. BIRDS. 481 it is also doubtful whether if beneficial f ^ey would often be preserved through selection and transmitted to succeeding generations.* Nevertheless, it may be worth while to give the few cases which I have been able to collect, relating chiefly to color simple albinism and melanism being excluded. Mr. Gould is well known to admit the exist- ence of few varieties, for he esteems very slight differences as specific; yet he statesf that near Bogota certain hum- ming-birds belonging to the genus Cynanthus are divided into two or three races or varieties, which differ from each other in the coloring of the tail " some having the whole of the feathers blue, while others have the eight central ones tipped with beautiful green. " It does not appear that intermediate gradations have been observed in this or the following cases. In the males alone of one of the Austra- lian paroquets " the thighs in some are scarlet, in others grass-green." In another paroquet of the same country "some individuals have the band across the wing-coverts bright yellow, while in others the same part is tinged with red."J In the United States some few of the males of the Scarlet Tanager ( Tanagra rubra) have " a beautiful trans- verse band of glowing red on the smaller wing-coverts;" but this variation seems to be somewhat rare, so that its preservation through sexual selection would follow only under unusually favorable circumstances. In Bengal tho honey buzzard (Pernis cristata) has either a small rudi- * " Origin of Species." 5th edit., 1869, p. 104. I had always per- ceived that rare and strongly marked deviations of structure, deserv- ing to be called monstrosities, could seldom be preserved through natural selection, and that the preservation of even highly beneficial variations would depend to a certain extent on chance. I had also fully appreciated the importance of mere individual differences, and this led me to insist so strongly on the importance of that unconscious form of selection by man which follows from the preservation of the most valued individuals of each breed, without any intention on his part to modify the characters of the breed. But until I read an able Article in the " North British Review " (March, 1867, p. 289, ctseq.), which has been of more use to me than any other review, I did not see how great the chances were against the preservation of variations, whether slight or strongly pronounced, occurring only in single individuals. f " Introduct. to the Trochilidae," p, 102. j: Gould, " Hand-book to Birds of Australia," vol. ii, pp. 32, 68. Audubon. "Ormtholog. Biography," 1838, vol. iv, p. 389. 482 THE DESCENT OF MAN. mental crest on its head, or none at all; so slight a differ- ence, however, Would not have been worth notice, had not this same species possessed in Southern India a well-marked occipital crest formed of several graduated feathers."* The following case is in some respects more interesting. A pied variety of the raven, with the head, breast, abdomen, and parts of the wings and tail-feathers white is con- fined to the Feroe Islands. It is not very rare there, for Graba saw during his visit from eight to ten living speci- mens. Although the characters of this variety are not quite constant, yet it has been named by several distin- guished ornithologists as a distinct species. The fact of the pied birds being pursued and persecuted with much clamor by the other ravens of the island was the chief cause which led Briiunich to conclude that they were specifically distinct; but this is now known to be an error, f This case seems analogous to that lately given of albino birds not pairing from being rejected by their comrades. In various parts of the northern seas a remarkable variety of the common Guillemot ( Uria troile) is found; and in Feroe one out of every five birds, according to Graba's esti- mation, presents this variation. It is characterized;]; by a pure white ring round the eye, with a curved narrow white line an inch and a half in length extending back from the ring. This conspicuous character lias caused the bird to be ranked by several ornithologists as a distinct species under the name of U. lacrymans, but it is now known to be merely a variety. It often pairs with the common kind, yet intermediate gradations have never been seen; nor is this surprising, for variations which appear suddenly are often, as I have elsewhere shown, transmitted either unal- tered or not at all. We thus see that two distinct forms of the same species may co-exist in the same district, and we cannot doubt that if the one had possessed any advantage *Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. i, p. 108; and Mr. Blyth, in " Land and Water," 1868, p. 381. f Graba, "Tagebuch Reise nacb Faro," 1830, ss. 51-54. Macgilli- vray, "Hist. British Birds," vol. iii, p. 745. "Ibis," vol. v, 1863, p. 469. f Graba, ibid, s. 54. Macgillivray, ibid, vol. v, p. 327. " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, "vol. ii, p. 93. BIRDS. 483 owr the other it would soon have been multiplied to the exclusion of the latter. If, for instance, the male pied ravens, instead of being persecuted by their comrades, had been highly attractive (like the above pied peacock) to the black female ravens their numbers would have rapidly increased. And this would have been a case of sexual selection. With respect to the slight individual differences which are common, in a greater or less degree, to all the mem- bers of the same species, we have every reason to believe that they are by far the most important for the work of selection. Secondary sexual characters are eminently liable to vary, both with animals in a state of nature and under domestication.* There is also reason to believe, as we have seen in our eighth chapter, that variations are more apt to occur in the male than in the female sex. All these contingencies are highly favorable for sexual selec- tion. Whether characters thus acquired are transmitted to one sex or to both sexes depends, as we shall see in the following chapter, on the form of inheritance which prevails. It is sometimes difficult to form an opinion whether cer- tain slight differences between the sexes of birds are simply the result of variability with sexually limited inheritance without the aid of sexual selection or whether they have been augmented through this latter process. I do not here refer to the many instances where the male displays splen- did colors or other ornaments of which the female partakes to a slight degree; for these are almost certainly due to characters primarily acquired by the male having been more or less transferred to the female. But what are we to conclude with respect to certain birds in which, for instance, the eyes differ slightly in color in the two sexes ?f In some cases the eyes differ conspicuously; thus with the storks of the genus Xenorhynclms, those of the male are blackish - hazel, while those of the female are gamboge- yellow; with many hornbills (Buceros), as I hear from Mr. Blyth.,1 the males have intense crimson eyes, and those of *On these points see also " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. i, p. 253; vol. ii, pp. 73, 75. f See, for instance, on the irides of a Podica and Gallicrex in "Ibis," vol. ii, 1860, p. 206; and vol. v, 1863, p. 426. {See also Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. i, pp. 243-245. 484 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the females are^ white. In the Buceros fiicornis, the hind margin of the casque and a stripe on the crest of the beak are black in the male, but not so in the female. Are we to suppose that these black marks and the crimson color of the eyes have been preserved or augmented through sexual selection in the males? This is very doubtful; for Mr. Bartlett showed me in the Zoological Gardens that the inside of the mouth of this buceros is black in the male and flesh-colored in the female; and their external appear- ance or beauty would not be thus affected. I observed in Chili * that the iris in the condor, when about a year old, is dark-brown, but changes at maturity into a yellowish- brown in the male, and into bright red in the female. The male has also a small, longitudinal, leaden-colored, fleshy crest or comb. The comb of many gallinaceous birds is highly ornamental, and assumes vivid colors during the act of courtship; but what are we to think of the dull-colored comb of the condor which does not appear to us in the least ornamental? The same question may be asked in regard to various other characters, such as the knob on the base of the beak of the Chinese goose (Anser cygnoidcs), which is much larger in the male than in the female. No certain answer can be given to these questions; but we ought to be cautious in assuming that knobs and various fleshy appen- dages cannot be attractive to the female, when we remem- ber that with savage races of man various hideous deformities deep scars on the face with the flesh raised into protuberances, the septum of the nose pierced by sticks or bones, holes in the ears and lips stretched widely open are all admired as ornamental. Whether or not unimportant differences between the sexes, such as those just specified, have been preserved through sexual selection, these differences, as well as all others, must primarily depend on the laws of variation. On the principle of correlated development, the plumage often varies on different parts of the body, or over the whole body, in the same manner. We see this well illustrated in certain breeds of the fowl. In all the breeds the feathers on the neck and loins of the males are elongated and are called hackles; now when both sexes acquire a top-knot, which is a new character in the genus, the feathers on the " Zoology of the Voyage of H. M. S. ' Beagle, ' " 1841, p. 6. BIRDS. 485 head of the male become hackle-shaped, evidently on the principle of correlation; while those on the head of the female are of the ordinary shape. The color also of the hackles forming the top-knot of the male is often cor- related with that of the hackles on the neck and loins, as may be seen by comparing these feathers in the golden and silver - spangled Polish, the Houdans and Creve-creur breeds. In some natural species we may observe exactly the same correlation in the colors of these same feathers, as in the males of the splendid gold and Amherst pheasants. The structure of each individual feather generally causes any change in its coloring to be symmetrical; we see this in the various laced, spangled, and penciled breeds of the fowl; and on the principle of correlation the feathers over the whole body are often colored in the same manner. We are thus enabled without much trouble to rear breeds with their plumage marked almost as symmetrically as in natural species. In laced and spangled fowls the colored margins of the feathers are abruptly defined ; but in a mongrel raised by me from a black Spanish cock glossed with green, and a white game-hen, all the feathers were greenish-black, excepting toward their extremities, which were yellowish- white; but between the white extremities and the black bases there was on each feather a symmetrical, curved zone of dark-brown. In some instances the shaft of the feather determines the distribution of the tints; thus with the body-feathers of a mongrel from the same black Spanish cock and a silver-spangled Polish hen, the shaft, together with a narrow space on each side, was greenish-black, and this was surrounded by a regular zone of dark-brown, edged with brownish-white. In these cases we have feathers symmetrically shaded, like those which give so much ele- gance to the plumage of many natural species. I have also noticed a variety of the common pigeon with the wing- bars symmetrically zoned with three bright shades, instead of being simply black on a slaty-blue ground, as in the parent-species. In many groups of birds the plumage is differently col- ored in the several species, yet certain spots, marks, or stripes are retained by all. Analogous cases occur with the breeds of the pigeon, which usually retain the two wing- bars, though they may be colored red, yellow, white, black, or blue, the rest of the plumage being of some wholly dif- 486 THE DESCENT OF MAN. ferent tint. Here is a more curious case, in which certain marks are retained, though colored in a manner almost exactly the opposite of what is natural ; the aboriginal pigeon has a blue tail, with the terminal halves of the outer webs of the two outer tail-feathers white ; now there is a sub - variety having a white instead of a blue tail, with precisely that part black which is white in the parent- species." * Formation and Variability of tlie Ocelli or Eye- Like Spots on the Plumage of Birds. As no ornaments are more beautiful than the ocelli on the feathers of various birds, on the hairy coats of some mammals, on the scales of reptiles and fishes, on the skin of amphibians, on the wings of many Lepidoptera and other insects, they deserve to be especially noticed. An ocellus consists of a spot within a ring of another color, like the pupil within the iris, but the central spot is often surrouded by additional concentric zones. The ocelli on the tail-coverts of the peacock offer a familiar example, as well as those on the wings of the peacock-butterfly (Vanessa). Mr. Trimen has given me a description of a South African moth (Gynanisa isis), allied to our emperor moth, in which a magnificent ocellus occupies nearly the whole surface of each hinder wing ; it consists of a black center, including a semi-transparent crescent-shaped mark, surrounded by successive ocher- yellow, black, ocher-yellow, pink, white, pink, brown and whitish zones. Although we do not know the steps by which these wonderfully beautiful and complex orna- ments have been developed the process has probably been a 'simple one, at least with insects; for, as Mr. Trimen writes to me, " no characters of mere marking or coloration are so unstable in the Lepidoptera as the ocelli, both in number and size." Mr. Wallace, who first called my attention to this subject, showed me a series of specimens of our common meadow-brown butterfly (Hipparchia janira) exhibiting numerous gradations from a simple minute black spot to an elegantly shaded ocellus. In a South African butterfly (Gyllo leda, Linu.), belonging to the same family, the ocelli are even still more variable. In some specimens *Bechstein, " Naturgeschicbte Deutschlands," B. iv, 1795, s. 3J, on a eub- variety of the Monck pigeon. BIRDS. 487 (a, fig. 53) large spaces on the upper surface of the wings are colored black, and include irregular white marks; and from this state a complete gradation can be traced into a tolerably perfect ocellus (a 1 ), and this results from the contraction of the irregular blotches of color. In another series of specimens a gradation can be followed from excessively minute white dots, surroundeJ by a scarcely visible black line (b), into perfectly symmetrical and large Pig. 53. Cyllo leda, Linn, from a drawing by Mr. Trimen, showing the extreme range of variation in the ocelli. a. Specimen, from Mauritius, upper surface of fore wing. a 1 . Specimen, from Natal, ditto. 6. Specimen, from Java, upper sur- face of hind wing. ft 1 . Specimen, from Mauritius, ditto. ocelli (5 1 ).* In cases like these, the development of a perfect ocellus does not require a long course of variation and selection. With birds and many other animals it seems to follow from the comparison of allied species that circular spots are often generated by the breaking up and contraction of stripes. In the Tragopan pheasant faint white lines in the * This wood-cut has been engraved from a beautiful drawing, most kindly made for me by Mr. Trimen ; see also his description of the wonderful amount of variation in the coloration and shape of the wings of this butterfly, in his " Rhopalocera Africse Australia," p. 186. 488 THE DESCENT OF MAN. female represent the beautiful white spots in the male;* and something of the same kind may be observed in the two sexes of the Argus pheasant. However this may be, appearances strongly favor the belief that, on the one hand, a dark spot is often formed by the coloring matter being drawn toward a central point from a surrounding zone, which latter is thus rendered lighter; and, on the other hand, that a white spot is often formed by the color being driven away from a central point, so that it accumulates in a surrounding darker zone. In either case an ocellus is the result. The coloring matter seems to be a nearly constant quantity, but is redistributed, either centripetally or cen- trifugally. The feathers of the common guinea-fowl offer a good instance of white spots surrounded by darker zones; and wherever the white spots are large and stand near each other the surrounding dark zones become confluent. In the same wing-feather of the Argus pheasant dark spots may be seen surrounded by a pale zone and white spots by a dark zone. Thus the formation of an ocellus in its most elementary state appears to be a simple affair. By what further steps the more complex ocelli,, which are surrounded by many successive zones of color, have been generated, I will not pretend to say. But the zoned feathers of the mongrels from differently colored fowls, and the extraor- dinary variability of the ocelli on many Lepidoptera, lead us to conclude that their formation is not a complex process, but depends on some slight and graduated change in the nature of the adjoining tissues. Gradation of Secondary Sexual Characters, Cases of gradation are important as showing us that highly complex ornaments may be acquired by small successive steps. In order to discover the actual steps by which the male of any existing bird has acquired his magnificent colors or other ornaments we ought to behold the long line of his extinct progenitors; but this is obviously impossible. We may, however, generally gain a clew by comparing all the species of the same group if it be a large one; for some of them will probably retain, at least partially, traces of their former characters. Instead of entering on tedious details respecting various groups, in which striking instances of * Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 517. BIRDS. 489 gradation could be given, it seems the best plan to take one or two strongly marked cases, for instance that of the peacock, in order to see if light can be thrown on the steps by which this bird has become so splendidly decorated. The peacock is chiefly remarkable from the extraordinary length of his tail-coverts; the tail itself not being much elongated. The barbs along nearly the whole length of these feathers stand separate or are decomposed; but this is the case with the feathers of many species and with some varieties of the domestic fowl and pigeon. The barbs coalesce toward the extremity of the shaft forming the oval disk or ocellus, which is certainly one of the most beautiful objects in the world. It consists of an iridescent, intensely blue, indented center, surrounded by a rich green zone, this by a broad coppery-brown zone, and this by five other narrow zones of slightly different iridescent shades. A trifling character in the disk deserves notice; the barbs for a space along one of the concentric zones are more or less destitute of their barbules, so that a part of the disk is surrounded by an almost transparent zone, which gives it a highly finished aspect. But I have elsewhere described* an exactly analogous variation in the hackles of a sub- variety of the gamecock in which the tips, having a metallic luster, " are separated from the lower part of the feather by a symmetrically shaped transparent zone composed of the naked portions of the barbs." The lower margin or base of the dark blue center of the ocellus is deeply indented on the line of the shaft. The surrounding zones likewise show traces, as may be seen in the drawing (fig. 54), of indentations, or rather breaks. These indentations are common to the Indian and Javan peacocks (Pavo cristatus and P. muticus) ; and they seem to deserve particular attention as probably connected with the devel- opment of the ocellus; but for a long time I could not conjecture their meaning. If we admit the principle of gradual evolution there must formerly have existed many species which presented every successive step between the wonderfully elongated tail-coverts of the peacock and the short tail-coverts of all ordinary birds; and again between the magnificent ocelli * "Variation of Animals and Plants under Domesticatiop," vol. i. p. 254. 490 THE DESCENT OF MAN. of the former and the simpler ocelli or mere colored spots on other birds; and so with all the other characters of the peacock. Let us look to the allied Gallinaceas for any still- existing gradations. The species and sub-species of Poly- plectrbn inhabit countries adjacent to the native land of the peacock; and they so far resemble this bird that they are sometimes called peacock-pheasants. I am also informed Fig. 54. Feather of peacock, about two-thirds of natural size, drawn by Mr. Ford. The transparent zone is represented by the outermost white zone, confined to the upper end of the disk. by Mr. Bartlett that they resemble the peacock in their voice and in some of their habits. During the spring the males, as previously described, strut about before the com- paratively plain-colored females, expanding and erecting their tail and wing feathers, which are ornamented with numerous ocelli. I request the reader to turn back to the drawing (fig. 51) of a Polyplectron. In P. napolconis the ocelli are confined to the tail, and the back is of a rich BIRDS. 491 metallic blue; in which respects this species approaches the Java peacock. P. hardwicMi possesses a peculiar top-knot, which is also somewhat like that of the Java peacock. In all the species the ocelli on the wings and tail are either circular or oval, and consist of a beautiful, iridescent, greenish-blue or greenish-purple disk with a black border. This border in P. chinquis shades into brown, edged with cream color, so that the ocellus is here surrounded with variously shaded, though not bright, concentric zones. The unusual length of the tail-coverts is another remark- able character in Polyplectron; for in some of the species they are half and in others two-thirds as long as the true tail feathers. The tail-coverts are ocellated as in the peacock. Thus the several species of Polyplectron mani- festly make a graduated approach to the peacock in the length of their tail-coverts, in the zoning of the ocelli, and in some other characters. Notwithstanding this approach, the first species of Poly- plectron which I examined almost made me give up the search; for I found not only that the true tail-feathers which in the peacock are quite plain, were ornamented with ocelli, but that the ocelli on all the feathers differed fundament- ally from those of the peacock, in there being two on the same feather (fig. 55), one on each side of the shaft. Hence I concluded that the early progenitors of the pea- cock could not have resembled a Polyplectron. But on continuing my search I observed that in some of the spe- cies the two ocelli stood very near each other; that in the tail-feathers of P. hardiuickii they touched each other ; and finally that on the tail-coverts of this same species as well as of P. malaccense (fig. 56) they were actually con- |fluent. As the central part alone is confluent, an indenta- ' tion is left at both the upper and lower ends; and the sur- rounding colored zones are likewise indented. A single ocellus is thus formed on each tail-covert, though still plainly betraying its double origin. These confluent ocelli differ from the single ocelli of the peacock in having an indentation at both ends instead of only at the lower or basal end. The explanation, however, of this difference is not difficult; in some species of Polyplectron the two oval ocelli on the same feather stand parallel to each other; in other species (as in P. chinquis) they converge toward one end; now the partial confluence of two convergent ocelli 492 THE DESCENT OF MAN. would manifestly leave a much deeper indentation at the divergent than at the convergent end. It is also manifest that if the convergence were strongly pronounced and the confluence complete, the indentation at the convergent end would tend to disappear. The tail-feathers in both species of the peacock are en- tirely destitute of ocelli, and this apparently is related to their being covered up and concealed by the long tail- coverts. In this respect they differ remarkably from the Fig. 55. Part of a tail-covert of Poly- Fig. 56. Part of a tale-covert of Poly- plectron chinquis, with the two plectrou malaocense, with the two ocelli of natural size. ocelli, partially confluent, of nat- ural size. tail-feathers of Polyplectron, which in most of the species are ornamented with larger ocelli than those on the tail- coverts. Hence I was led carefully to examine the tail- feathers of the several species, in order to discover whether their ocelli showed any tendency to disappear; and to my great satisfaction this appeared to be so. The central tail- feathers of P. napoleonis have the two ocelli on each side of the shaft perfectly developed; but the inner ocellus be- comes less and less conspicuous on the more exterior tail- feathers, until a mere shadow or rudiment is left on the inner side of the outermost feather. Again, in P. malac- BIRDS. 493 cense, the ocelli on the tail-coverts are, as we have seen, confluent; and these feathers are of unusual length, being two-thirds of the length of the tail-feathers, so that in both these respects they approach the tail-coverts of the peacock. Now in P. malaccense the two central tail-feathers alone are ornamented, each with two brightly colored ocelli, the inner occellus having completely disappeared from all the other tail-feathers. Consequently the tail-coverts and tail- feathers of this species of Polyplectron make a near approach in structure and ornamentation to the corresponding feathers of the peacock. As far, then, as gradation throws light on the steps by which the magnificent train of the peacock has been acquired, hardly anything more is needed. If we picture to ourselves a progenitor of the peacock in an almost exactly intermediate condition between the existing peacock with his enormously elongated tail-coverts ornamented with single ocelli, and an ordinary gallinaceous bird with short tail-coverts merely spotted with some color, we shall see a bird allied to Polyplectron that is, with tail-coverts capable of erection and expansion, ornamented with two partially confluent ocelli, and long enough almost to conceal the tail-feathers, the latter having already partially lost their ocelli. The indentation of the central disk and of the surrounding zones of the ocellus in both species of peacock speaks plainly in favor of this view and is otherwise inexpli- cable. The males of the Polyplectron are no doubt beautiful birds, but their beauty, when viewed from a little distance, cannot be compared with that of the peacock. Many female progenitors of the peacock must, during a long line of descent, have appreciated this superiority; for they have unconsciously, by the continued preference of the most beautiful males, rendered the peacock the most splendid of living birds. Argus Pheasant. Another excellent case for investiga- tion is offered by the ocelli on the wing-feathers of the - Argus pheasant, which are shaded in so wonderful a manner as to resemble balls lying loose within sockets and consequently differ from ordinary ocelli. No oi?e, I pre- sume, will attribute the shading, which has excited the admiration of many experienced artists, to chance to the fortuitous concourse of atoms of coloring matter;- That 494 THE DESCENT OF MAN. these ornaments should have been formed through the selec- tion of many successive variations, not one of which was originally intended to produce the ball-and-socket effect, seems as incredible as that one of Kapheal's Madonnas should have been formed by the selection of chance daubs of paint made by a long ABC succession of young art- ists, not one of whom intended at first to draw the human figure. In order to discover how the ocelli have been developed we cannot look to a long line of progenitors nor to many closely allied forms, for such do not now exist. But fortunately the several feathers on the wing suffice to give us a clew to the problem, and they prove to dem- onstration that a gra- dation is at least pos- sible from a mere spot to a finished ball-and- socket ocellus. The wing - feathers, bearing the ocelli, are covered with dark stripes (fig. 57) or with rows of dark spots (fig. 59), each stripe or Part of secondary wing-feather of ,. nw f c-n^tc vnnniiirr _; pheasant, showing two perfect ocelli, row ol 6 P ots H'nillllg a and b. A, B, C, D, etc., are dark stripes running obliquely down, each to an ocellus. [Much of the web on both sides, especially to the left of the shaft, has been cut off.] obliquely down the outer side of the shaft to one of the ocelli. The spots are gen- erally elongated in a line transverse to the row in which they stand. They often become confluent either in the line of the row and then they form a longitudinal stripe or transversely, that is, with the spots in the adjoining rows, and then they, form transverse stripes. A spot sometimes BIRDS. 495 breaks up into smaller spots,, which still stand in their proper places. It will be convenient first to describe a perfect ball-and- socket ocellus. This consists of an intensely black circular ring, surrounding a space shaded so as exactly to resemble a ball. The figure here given has been admirably drawn by Mr. Ford and well en- graved, but a wood-cut cannot exhibit the exqui- site shading of the original. The ring is almost alwa} r s slightly broken or inter- rupted (see fig. 57) at a point in the upper half a little to the right of and above the white shade on the inclosed ball; it is also sometimes broken toward thebase on the right hand. These little breaks have an important meaning. The ring is always much thick- ened, with the edges ill- defined toward the left- hand upper corner, the feather being held erect in the position in which it is here drawn. Beneath this thickened part there is on the surface of the ball an ob- lique, almost pure white mark which shades off downward into a pale-leaden hue, and this into yellowish and brown tints, which insensibly become darker and darker toward the lower part of the ball. It is this shading which gives so admirably the effect of light shining on a convex surface. If one of the balls be examined it will be seen that the lower part is of a brown tint and is indistinctly separated -by a curved oblique line from the upper part, which is yel- lower and more leaden; this curved oblique line runs at right angles to the longer axis of the white patch of light, and indeed of all the shading; but this difference in color, which cannot of course be shown in the wood-cut, does not in the least interfere with the perfect shading of the ball. . 58. Basal part of the secondary wing-feather nearest to the body. 496 THE DESCENT OF MAN. It should be particularly observed that each ocellus stands in obvious connection either with a dark stripe or with a longitudinal row of dark spots, for both occur indifferently on the same feather. Thus in fig. 57 stripe A runs to ocellus a; B runs to ocellus b; stripe C is broken in the upper part and runs down to the next succeeding ocellus, not represented in the wood-cut; D to the next lower one, and so with the stripes E and F. Lastly the several ocelli are separated from each other by a pale surface bearing irregular black marks. I will next describe the other extreme of the series, namely, the first trace of an ocellus. The short secondary wing-feather (fig. 58), nearest to the body, is marked like the other feathers, with oblique, longitudinal, rather irreg- ular rows of very dark spots. The basal spot, or that near- est the shaft in the five lower rows (excluding the lowest one), is a little larger than the other spots of the same row, and a little more elongated in a transverse direction. It differs also from the other spots by being bordered on its upper side with some dull fulvous shading. But this spot is not in any way more remarkable than those on the plum- age of many birds, and might easily be overlooked. The next higher spot does not differ at all from the upper ones in the same row. The larger basal spots occupy exactly the same relative position on these feathers as do the per- fect ocelli on the longer wing-feathers. By looking to the next two or three succeeding wing- feathers, an absolutely insensible gradation can be traced from one of the last described basal spots, together with the next higher one in the same row, to a curious ornament, which cannot be called an ocellus, and which I will name, from the want of a better term, an "elliptic ornament." These are shown in the accompanying figure (fig. 59). AVo here see several oblique rows, A, B, C, D, etc. (see the let- tered diagram on the right hand), of dark spots of the usual character. Each row of spots runs down to and i connected with one of the elliptic ornaments, in exactly the same manner as each stripe in fig. 57 runs down to, and is connected with, one of the ball-and-socket o'celli. Looking to any one row, for instance, B, in fig. 59, the lowest mark (b) is thicker and considerably longer than tho upper spots, and has its left extremity pointed and curve. I upward. This black mark is abruptly bordered on its BIRDS. 49? upper side by a rather broad space of richly shaded tints, beginning with a narrow brown zone, which passes into orange, and this into a pale leaden tint, with the end toward the shaft much paler. These shaded tints together fill up the whole inner space of the elliptic ornament. The mark Pig. 59. Portion of one of the secondary wing-feathers near the body, showing the so-called elliptic ornaments. The right-hand figure is given merely as a diagram for the sake of the letters of reference. A, B, C, D, etc. Rows of spots running down to and forming the elliptic ornaments. b. Lowest spot or mark in row B. c. The next succeeding spot or mark in the same row. d. Apparently a broken prolongation of the spot C in the same row B. (b) corresponds in every respect with the basal shaded spot of the simple feather described in the last paragraph (fig. 58), but is more highly developed and more brightly col- ored. Above and to the right of this spot (b fig. 59), with i-ts bright shading, there is a long, narrow, black mark (c), belonging to the same row, and which is arched a little downward so as to face (b). This mark is sometimes broken into two portions. It is also narrowly edged on the lower side with a fulvous tint. To the left of and above (c), in the same oblique direction, but always more or less distinct 498 THE DESCENT OF MAN. from it, there is another black mark (d). This mark is generally sub-triangular and irregular in shape, but in the one lettered in the diagram it is unusually narrow, elon- gated and regular. It apparently consists of a lateral and broken prolongation of the mark (c), together with its con- fluence with a broken and prolonged part of the next spot above; but I do not feel sure of this. These three marks, (b), (c) and (d), Avith the intervening bright shades, form together the so-called elliptic ornament. These ornaments placed parallel to the shaft, manifestly correspond in posi- tion with the ball-and-socket ocelli. Their extremely ele- gant appearance cannot be appreciated in the drawing, as the orange and leaden tints, contrasting so well with the black marks, cannot be shown. Between one of the elliptic ornaments and a perfect ball-and-socket ocellus the gradation is so perfect that it is scarcely possible to decide when the latter term ought to be used. The passage from the one into the other is effected by the elongation and greater curvature in the opposite directions of the lower black mark (b fig. 59), and more especially of the upper one (c), together with the contrac- tion of the elongated sub-triangular or narrow mark ^d), so that at last these three marks become confluent, forming an irregular elliptic ring. This ring is gradually rendered more and more circular and regular, increasing at the same time in diameter. I have here given a drawing (fig. 60) of the natural size of an ocellus not as yet quite perfect. The lower part of the black ring is much more curved than is the lower mark in the elliptic ornament (b fig. 59). The upper part of the ring consists of two or three separate portions; and there is only a trace of the thickening of the portion which forms the black mark above the white shade. This white shade itself is not as yet much concentrated; and beneath it the surface is brighter colored than in a per- fect ball-and-socket ocellus. Even in the most perfect ocelli traces of the junction of three or four elongated black marks, by which the ring has been formed, may often be detected. The irregular sub-triangular or narrow mark (d fig. 59), manifestly forms, by its contraction and equal- ization, the thickened portion of the ring above the white shade on a perfect ball-and-socket ocellus. The lower part of the ring is invariably a little thicker than the other parts (see fig. 57), and this follows from the lower black BIRDS. 499 mark of the elliptic ornament (3 fig. 59) having originally "been thicker than the upper mark (c). Every step can be followed in the process of confluence and modification; and the black ring which sur- rounds the ball of the ocellus is unquestionably formed by the union and modification of the three black marks, b, c, d, of the elliptic ornament. The irregular zigzag black marks between the successive '. GO. Kig. 61. Fig. 60. An ocellus in an intermedate condition between the elliptic ornament and the perfect ball-and-socket ocellus. Fig. 61. Portion near summit of one of the secondary wing-feathers, bearing perfect ball-and-socket ocelli, a. Ornamented upper part. b. Uppermost, imperfect ball-and-socket ocellus. (The shading above the white mark on the summit of the ocellus is here a little too dark.) c. Perfect ocellus. ocelli (see again fig. 57) are plainly due to the breaking up ot the somewhat more regular but similar marks between the elliptic ornaments. The successive steps in the shading of the ball-and- socket ocelli can be followed out with equal clearness. The brown, orange and pale-leadened narrow zones which border the lower black mark of the elliptic ornament can iN30 THE DESCENT OF MAN. be seen gradually to become more and more softened and shaded into each other, with the upper lighter part toward the left-hand corner rendered still lighter, so as to become almost white and at the same time more contracted. But even in the most perfect ball-and-socket ocelli a slight dif- fereace in the tints, though not in the shading, between the upper and lo\*er parts of the ball can be perceived, as before noticed; and the line of separation is oblique in the same direction as the bright-colored shades of the elliptic flrnamects. Thus almost every minute detail in the shape and coloring of the ball-and-socket ocelli can be shown to follow f/om gradual changes in the elliptic ornaments; and the development of the latter can be traced by equally 6m all steps from the union of two almost simple spots, the lower one (fig. 58) having some dull fulvous shading on its upper side. The extremities of the longer secondary feathers which bear the perfect ball-and-socket ocelli are peculiarly orna- mented (fig. 61). The oblique longitudinal stripes sud- denly cease upward and become confused; and above this limit the whole upper end of the feather (a) is covered with white dots surrounded by little black rings standing on a dark ground. The oblique stripe belonging to the uppermost ocellus (b) is barely represented by a very short irregular black mark with the usual curved, transverse base. As this stripe is thus abruptly cut off we can per- haps understand from what has gone before how it is that the upper thickened part of the ring is here absent; for, as before stated, this thickened part apparently stands in some relation with a broken prolongation from the next higher spot. From the absence of the upper and thickened part of the ring the uppermost ocellus, though perfect in all other respects, appears as if its top had been obliquely sliced off. It would, I think, perplex any one who believes that the plumage of the Argus pheasant was created as we now see it to account for the imperfect condition of the uppermost ocellus. I should add that on the secondary wing-feather farthest from the body all the ocelli are smaller and less perfect than on the other feathers and have the upper part of the ring deficient, as in the case just mentioned. The imperfection here seems to be con- nected with the fact that the spots on this feather show less tendency than usual to become confluent into stripes; BIRDS. 501 they are, on the contrary, often broken up into smaller spots, so that two or three rows run down to the same ocellus. There still remains another very curious point, first observed by Mr. T. W. Wood,* which deserves attention. In a photograph, given me by Mr. Ward, of a specimen mounted as in the act of display, it may be seen that on the feathers which are held perpendicularly, the white marks on the ocelli, representing light reflected from a convex surface, are at the upper or farther end, that is, are directed upward; and the bird while displaying himself on the ground would naturally be illuminated from above. But here comes the curious point, the outer feathers are held almost horizontally, and their ocelli ought likewise to appear as if illuminated from above, and consequently the white marks ought to be placed on the upper sides of the ocelli; and, wonderful as is the fact, they are thus placed! Hence the ocelli on the several feathers, though occupying very different positions with respect to the light, all appear as if illuminated from above, just as an artist would have shaded them. Nevertheless they are not illuminated from strictly the same point as they ought to be; for the white marks on the ocelli of the feathers, which are held almost horizontally, are placed rather too much toward the farther end; that is, they are not sufficiently lateral. We have, however, no right to expect absolute perfection in a part rendered ornamental through sexual selection, any more than we have in a part modified through natural selection for real use; for instance, in that wondrous organ the human eye. And we know what Helmholtz, the highest authority in Europe on the subject, has said about the human eye, that if an optician had sold him an instrument BO carelessly made, he would have thought himself fully justified in returning it. f We have now seen that a perfect series can be followed, from simple spots to the wonderful ball-and-socket orna- ments. Mr. Gould, who kindly gave me some of these feather*, fully agrees with me in the completeness of the gradation. It is obvious that the stages in development * The " Field," May 28, 1870. f " Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects," Eng. trans., 1873, pp. 219. 227, 269, 890. 502 THE DESCENT OF MAN. exhibited by the feathers on the same bird do not at all necessarily show us the steps passed through by the extinct progenitors of the species; but they probably give us the clue to the actual steps, and they at least prove to demon- stration that a gradation is possible. Bearing in mind how carefully the male Argus pheasant displays his plumes before the female, as well as the many facts rendering it probable that female birds prefer the more attractive males, no one who admits the agency of sexual selection in any case will deny that a simple dark spot with some fulvous shading might be converted, through the approximation and modification of two adjoining spots, together with some slight increase of color, into one of the so-called ellip- tic ornaments. These latter ornaments have been shown to many persons, and all have admitted that they are beau- tiful, some thinking them even more so than the ball-and- socket ocelli. As the secondary plumes became lengthened through sexual selection, and as the elliptic ornaments increased in diameter, their colors apparently became less bright; and then the ornamentation of the plumes had to be gained by an improvement in the pattern and shading ; and this process was carried on until the wonderful ball- and-socket ocelli were finally developed. Thus we can understand and in no other way as it seen.? to me the present condition and origin of the ornaments on the wing-feathers of the Argus pheasant. From the light afforded by the principle of gradation from what we know of the laws of variation from the changes which have taken place in many of our domesti- cated birds and, lastly, from the character (as we shall hereafter see more clearly) of the immature plumage of young birds we can sometimes indicate, with a certain amount of confidence, the probable steps by which the males have acquired their brilliant plumage and various ornaments; yet in many cases we are involved in complete darkness. Mr. Gould several years ago pointed out to me a humming-bird, the Urosticte benjaniini, remarkable for the curious differences between the sexes. The male, besides a splendid gorget, has greenish-black tail-feathers with the four central ones tipped with white; in the female, as with most of the allied species, the three outer tail- feathers on each side are tipped with white, so that the BIRDS. 503 male has the four central, while the female has the six exte- rior feathers ornamented with white tips. What makes the case more curious is that, although the coloring of the tail differs remarkably in both sexes of many kinds of hum- ming-birds, Mr. Gould does not know a single species, besides the Urosticte, in which the male has the four central feathers tipped with white. The Duke of Argyll, in commenting on this case,* passes over sexual selection, and asks: " What explanation does the law of natural selection give of such specific varieties as these ?" He answers " none whatever;" and I quite agree with him. But can this be so confidently said of sexual selection ? Seeing in how many ways the tail-feathers of humming-birds differ, why should not the four central feathers have varied in this one species alone, so as to have acquired white tips ? The variations may have been gradual or somewhat abrupt, as in the case recently given of the humming-birds near Bogota, in which certain individuals alone have the " central tail-feathers tipped with beautiful green." In the female of the Urosticte I noticed extremely minute or rudimental white tips to the two outer of the four central black tail-feathers; so that here we have an indication of change of some kind in the plumage of this species. If we grant the possibility of the central tail feathers of the male varying in whiteness, there is nothing strange in such variations having been sexually selected. The Avhite tips, together with the small white ear-tuffs, certainly add, as the Duke of Argyll admits, to the beauty of the male ; and whiteness is apparently appre- cited by other, birds, as may be inferred from such cases as the snow-white male of the bell-bird. The statement made by Sir R. Heron should not be forgetten, namely, that his peahens, when debarred from access to the pied peacock, would not unite with any other male, and during that season produced no offspring. Nor is it strange that variations in the tail-feathers of the Urosticte should have been specially selected for the sake of ornament, for the next succeeding genus fn the family takes its name of Metallura from the splendor of these feathers. We have, moreover, good evidence that humming-birds take especial pains in dis- *" The Reign of Law," 1867, p. 247. 504 THE DESCENT OF MAN. w their tail-feathers; Mr. Belt,* after describing the iuty^of the Florisuga mellivora, says: " I have seen the female sitting on a branch and two males displaying their charms in front of her. One would shoot up like a rocket, then, suddenly expanding the snow-white tail, like an inverted parachute, slowly descend in front of her, turning round gradually to show off back and front. . . . The expanded white tail covered more space than all the rest of the bird, and was evidently the grand feature in the per- formance. While one male was descending the other would shoot up and come slowly down expanded. The entertainment would end in a fight between the two per- formers; but whether the most beautiful or the most pugna- cious was the accepted suitor, I know not." Mr. Gould, after describing the peculiar plumage of the Urosticte, adds, "that ornament and variety is the sole object, I have myself but little doubt."f If this be admitted, we can per- ceive that the males which during former times were decked in the most elegant and novel manner would have gained an advantage, not in the ordinary struggle for life, but in rivalry with other males, and would have left a larger number of offspring to inherit their newly acquired beauty. *The Naturalist in Nicaragua," 1874, p. 112. f " Introduction to the Trochilidse," 1861, p, 110. BIRDS. 505 CHAPTER XV. BIEDS continued. Discussion as to why the males alone of some species, and both sexes of others, are brightly colored On sexually limited inheritance, as applied to various structures and to brightly colored plumage Nidification in relation to color Loss of nuptial plumage dur- ing the winter. WE have in this chapter to consider why the females of many birds have not acquired the same ornaments as the male; and why, on the other hand,, both sexes of many other birds are equally, or almost equally, ornamented? In the following chapter we shall consider the few cases in which the female is more conspicuously colored than the male. In my " Origin of Species"* I briefly suggested that the long tail of the peacock would be inconvenient and the conspicuous black color of the male capercailzie dangerous to the female during the period of incubation; and conse- quently that the transmission of these characters from the male to the female offspring had been checked through natural selection. I still think that this may have occurred in some few instances; but after mature reflection on all the facts which I have been able to collect, I am now inclined to believe that when the sexes differ the successive variations have generally been from the first limited in their transmission to the same sex in which they first arose. Since my remarks appeared the subject of sexual coloration has been discussed in some very interesting papers by Mr. Wallace,! who believes that in almost all Cases the successive variations tended at first to be trans- mitted equally to both sexes; but that the female Avas saved, * Fourth edition, 1866, p. 241. I- " Westminster Review." July, 1867. "Journal of Travel." vol. i, 1868, p. 73. 506 THE DESCENT OF MAN. through natural selection, from acquiring the conspicuous colors of the male, owing to the danger which she would thus have incurred during incubation. This view necessitates a tedious discussion on a difficult point, namely, whether the transmission of a character which is at first inherited by both sexes can be subsequently limited in its transmission to one sex alone by means of natural selection. We must bear in mind, as shown in the preliminary chapter on sexual selection, that characters which are limited in their development to one sex are always latent in the other. An imaginary illustration will best aid us in seeing the difficulty of the case; we may sup- pose that a fancier wished to make a breed of pigeons, in which the males alone should be colored of a pale blue, while the females retained their former slaty tint. As with pigeons characters of all kinds are usually transmitted to both sexes equally, the fancier would have to try to convert this latter form of inheritance into sexually limited trans- mission. All that he could do would be to persevere in selecting every male pigeon which was in the least degree of a paler blue; and the natural result of this process, if steadily carried on for a long time, and if the pale varia- tions were strongly inherited or often recurred, would be to make his whole stock of a lighter blue. But our fancier would be compelled to match, generation after generation, his pale-blue males with slaty females, for he wishes to keep the latter of this color. The result would generally be the production either of a mongrel piebald lot, or more prob- ably the speedy and complete loss of the pale-blue tint; for the primordial slaty color would be transmitted with pre- potent force. Supposing, however, that some pale-blue males and slaty females were produced during each succes- sive generation, and were always crossed together, then the slaty females would have, if I may use the expression, much blue blood in their veins, for their fathers, grandfathers, etc., will all have been blue birds. Under these circum- stances it is conceivable (though I know of no distinct facts rendering it probable) that the slaty females might acquire so strong a latent tendency to pale-blueness that they would not destroy this color in their male offspring, their female offspring still inheriting the slaty tint. If so, the desired end of making a breed with the two sexes permanently dif- ferent in color might be gained. BIRDS. 507 The extreme importance, or rather necessity, in the above case of the desired character, namely, pale-blueness, oeing present though in a latent state in the female, so that the male offspring should not be deteriorated, will be best appreciated as follows: the male of Sremmerring's pheasant has a tail thirty-seven inches in length, while that of the female is only eight inches; the tail of the male common pheasant is about twenty inches, and that of the female twelve inches long. Now if the female Scemmerring pheas- ant with her short tail were crossed with the male common pheasant there can be no doubt that the male hybrid off- spring would have a much longer tail than that of the pure offspring of the common pheasant. On the other hand, if the female common pheasant, with a tail much longer than that of the female Soemmerring pheasant, were crossed with the male of the latter, the male hybrid offspring would have a much shorter tail than that of the pure offspring of Scemmerring's pheasant. * Our fancier, in order to make his new breed with the males of a pale-blue tint, and the females unchanged, would have to continue selecting the males during many generations; and each stage of paleness would have to be fixed in the males, and rendered latent in the females. The task would be an extremely difficult one, and has never been tried, but might possibly be successfully carried out. The chief obstacle would be the early and complete loss of the pale-blue tint, from the necessity of reiterated crosses with the slaty female, the latter not having at first any latent tendency to produce pale-blue offspring. On the other hand, if one or two males were to vary ever so slightly in paleness, and the variations were from the first limited in their transmission to the male sex, the task of making a new breed of the desired kind would be easy, for such males would simply have to be selected and matched with ordinary females. An analogous case has actually occurred, for there are breeds of the pigeon in Belgium f in which the males alone are marked with black * Temminck says that the tail of the female Phasianm Scemmer- ringii is only six inches long, " Planches coloriees," vol. v, 1838, pp. 487, 488; the measurements above given were made for me by Mr. Bclater. For the common pheasant, see Macgillivray, " Hist. Brit Birds," vol. i, pp. 118-121. fDr. Chapius, " Le Pigeon Voyageur Beige," 1865, p. 8?. 508 THE DESCENT OF MAN. striae. So again Mr. Tegetmeier has recently shown * that dragons not rarely produce silver-colored birds, which are almost always hens; and he himself has bred ten such females. It is on the other hand a very unusual event when a silver male is produced; so that nothing would be easier, if desired, than to make a breed of dragons with blue males and silver females. This tendency is indeed so strong that when Mr. Tegetmeier at last got a silver male and matched him with one cf the silver females he expected to get a breed with both sexes thus colored ; he was, however, disappointed, for the young male reverted to the blue color of his grandfather, the young female alone being silver. No doubt with patience this tendency to reversion in the males, reared from an occasional silver male matched with a silver hen, might be eliminated, and then both sexes would be colored alike; and this very process has been followed with success by Mr. Esquilant in the case of silver turbits. With fowls, variations of color, limited in their trans- mission to the male sex, habitually occur. When this form of inheritance prevails it might well happen that some of the successive variations would be transferred to the female, who would then slightly resemble the male, as actually occurs in some breeds. Or again, the greater number, but not all, of the successive steps might be transferred to both sexes, and the female would then closely resemble the male. There can hardly be a doubt that this is the cause of the male pouter pigeon having a somewhat larger crop, and of the male carrier pigeon having somewhat larger wattles than their respective females ; for fanciers have not selected one sex more than the other, and have had no wish that these characters should be more strongly dis- played in the male than in the female, yet this is the case with both breeds. The same process would have to be followed and the same difficulties encountered if it were desired to make a breed with the females alone of some new color. Lastly, our fancier might wish to make a breed with the two sexes differing from each other, and both from the parent species. Here the difficulty would be extreme unless the successive variations were from the first sexually * "The Field," Sept,, BIRDS. 509 limited on both sides, and then there would be no diffi- culty. We see this with the fowl; thus the two sexes of the penciled Hamburghs differ greatly from each other, and from the two sexes of the aboriginal Gallus lankiva; and both are now kept constant to their standard of excel- lence by continued selection which would be impossible unless the- distinctive characters of both were limited in their transmission. The Spanish fowl offers a more curious case; the male has an immense comb, but some of the successive varia- tions, by the accumulation of which it was acquired, appear to have been transferred to the female; for she has a comb many times larger than that of the females of the parent species. But the comb of the female differs in one respect from that of the male, for it is apt to lop over; and within a recent period it has been ordered by the fancy that this should always be the case, and success has quickly followed the order. ^ Now the lopping of the comb must be sexually limited in its transmission, otherwise it would prevent the comb of the male from being perfectly upright, which would be abhorrent to every fancier. On the other hand, the uprightness of the comb in the male must likewise be a sexually limited character, otherwise it would prevent the comb of the female from lopping over. Prom the foregoing illustrations we see that even with almost unlimited time at command it would be an ex- tremely difficult and complex, perhaps an impossible pro- cess, to change one form of transmission into the other through selection. Therefore, without distinct evidence in each case, I am unwilling to admit that this has been effected in natural species. On the other hand, by means of successive variations, which were from the first sexually limited in their transmission, there would not be the least difficulty in rendering a male bird widely different in color or in any other character from the female; the latter being left unaltered, or slightly altered, or specially modified for the sake of protection. - As bright colors are of service to the males in their rivalry with other males, such colors would be selected whether or not they were transmitted exclusively to the same sex. Consequently the females might be expected often to partake of the brightness of the males to a greater or less degree; and this occurs with a host of species. 510 THE DESCENT OF MAN. If all the successive variations were transmitted onnallj to both sexes the females would be indistinguishable from the males ; and this likewise occurs with many birds. If, however, dull colors were of high importance for the safety of the female during incubation, as with many ground birds, the females which varied in brightness or which received through inheritance from the males any marked accession of brightness would sooner or later be destroyed. But the tendency in the males to continue for an indefinite period transmitting to their female off- spring their own brightness, would have to be eliminated by a change in the form of inheritance; and this, as shown by our previous illustration, would be extremely difficult. The more probable result of the long-continued destruc- tion of the more brightly colored females, supposing the equal form of transmission to prevail, would be the lessen- ing or annihilation of the bright colors of the males, owing to their continual crossing with the duller females. It would be tedious to follow out all the other possible results; but I may remind the reader that if sexually lim- ited variations in brightness occurred in the females, even if they were not in the least injurious to them and conse- quently were not eliminated, yet they would not be favored or selected, for the male usually accepts any female, and does not select the more attractive individuals ; conse- quently these variations would be liable to be lost, and would have little influence on the character of the race; and this will aid in accounting for the females being commonly duller-colored than the males. In the eighth chapter instances were given, to which many might here be added, of variations occurring at vari- ous ages and inherited at the corresponding age It was also shown that variations which occur late in life are com- monly transmitted to the same sex in which they first appear; while variations occurring early in life are apt to be transmitted to both sexes; not that all the cases of sexu- ally limited transmission can thus be accounted for. It was further shown that if a male bird varied by becoming brighter while young, such variations would be of no ser- vice until the age for reproduction had arrived, and there was competition between rival males. But in the case of birds living on the ground and commonly in need of the protection of dull colors, bright tints would be far more BIRDS. 511 dangerous to the young and inexperienced than to the adult males. Consequently the males which varied in brightness while young would suffer much destruction and be eliminated through natural selection; on the other hand, the males which varied in this manner when nearly mature, notwithstanding that they were exposed to some additional danger, might survive, and, from being favored through sexual selection, Avould procreate their kind. As a relation often exists between the period of variation and the form of transmission, if the bright-colored young males were destroyed and the mature ones were successful in their courtship, the males alone would acquire brilliant colors and would transmit them exclusively to their male off- spring. But I by no means wish to maintain that the influence of age on the form of transmission is the sole cause of the great difference in brilliancy between the sexes of many birds. When the sexes of birds differ in color it is interesting to determine whether the males alone have been modified by sexual selection, the females having been left unchanged or only partially and indirectly thus changed; or whether the females have been specially modified through natural selection for the sake of protection. I will, tlieref ore, dis- cuss this question at some length, even more fully than its intrinsic importance deserves; for various curious collateral points may thus be conveniently considered. Before we enter on the subject of color, more especially in reference to Mr. Wallace's conclusions, it may be useful to discuss some other sexual differences under a similar point of view. A breed of fowls formerly existed in Ger- many* in which the hens were furnished with spurs; they were good layers, but they so greatly disturbed their nests with their spurs that they could not be allowed to sit on their own eggs. Hence at one time it appeared to me probable that with the females of the wild Gallinaceae the development of spurs had been checked through natural selection from the injury thus caused to their nests. This seemed all the more probable, as wing-spurs, which would not be injurious during incubation, are often as well developed in the female as in the male; though in not a Bechstein, " Naturgescli. Deutschlands," 1793, B. iii, s. 339. 512 THE DESCENT OF MAN. few cases they are rather larger in the male. When th male is furnished with leg-spurs the female almost always exhibits rudiments of them the rudiment sometimes con- sisting of a mere scale, as in Gallus. Hence it might be argued that the females had aboriginally been furnished with well-developed spurs, but that these had subsequently been lost through disuse or natural selection. But if this view be admitted it would have to be extended to innumer- able other cases; and it implies that the female progenitors of the existing spur-bearing species were once incumbered with an injurious appendage. In some few genera and species, as in Galloperdix, Acomus and the Javan peacock (Pavo muticus), the females, as well as the males, possess well-developed leg- spurs. Are we to infer from this fact that they construct a different sort of nest from that made by their nearest allies, and not liable to be injured by their spurs, so that the spurs have not been removed ? Or are we to suppose that the females of these several species especially require spurs for their defense ? It is a more probable conclusion that both the presence and absence of spurs in the females result from different laws of inheritance having prevailed, independently of natural selection. With the many females in which spurs appear as rudiments we may con- clude that some few of the successive variations, through which they were developed in the males, occurred very early in life and were consequently transferred to the females. In the other and much rarer cases in which the females possess fully developed spurs we may conclude that all the successive variations were transferred to them; and that they gradually acquired and inherited the habit of not disturbing their nests. The vocal organs and the feathers variously modified for producing sound, as well as the proper instincts for using them, often differ in the two sexes, but are sometimes the same in both. Can such differences be accounted for by the males having acquired these organs and instincts, while the females have been saved from inheriting them, on account of the danger to which they would have been exposed by attracting the attention of birds or beasts of prey? This does not seem to me probable, when we think of the multitude of birds which with impunity gladden the BIRDS. 513 country with their voices during the spring. * It is a safer con- clusion that, as vocal and instrumental organs are of special service only to the males during their courtship, these organs were developed through sexual selection and their constant use in that sex alone the successive variations and the effects of use having been from the first more or less limited in transmission to the male offspring. Many analogous cases could be adduced ; those, foi instance, of the plumes on the head being generally longer in the male than in the female, sometimes of equal length in both sexes, and occasionally absent in the female these several cases occurring in the same group of birds. It would be difficult to account for such a difference between the sexes by the female having been benefited by possessing a slightly shorter crest than the male, and its consequent diminution or complete suppression through natural selec- tion. But I will take a more favorable case, namely, the length of the tail. The long train of the peacock would have been not only inconvenient but dangerous to the peahen during the period of incubation and while accom- panying her young. Hence, there is not the least a priori improbability in the development of her tail having been checked through natural selection. But the females of various pheasants, which apparently are exposed on their open nests to as much danger as the peahen, have tails of considerable length. The females as well as the males of the Menura superset have long tails, and they build a domed nest, which is a great anomaly in so large a bird. Naturalists have wondered how the female menura could manage her tail during incubation; but it is now known f that she " enters the nest head first, and then turns round, with her tail sometimes over her back, but more often bent round by her side. Thus in time the tail becomes quite askew, and is a tolerable guide to the length of time the bird has been sitting." Both sexes of an Australian king- fisher (Tanysiptera sylvia\ have the middle tail-feathers greatly lengthened, and tne female makes her nest in a *Daines Barrington, however, thought it probable (" Phil. Trans- act.," 1773, p. 164) that few female birds sing, because the talent would have been dangerous to them during incubation. He adds that a similar view may possibly account for the inferiority of the female to the male in plumage. fMr. Ramsay, in " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1868, p. 50. 514 THE DESCENT OF MAN. hole; and, as I am informed by Mr. R. B. Sharpe, these feathers become much crumpled during incubation. In these two latter cases the great length of the tail- feathers must be in some degree inconvenient to the female; and as in both species the tail-feathers of the female are somewhat shorter than those of the male, it might be argued that their full development had been prevented through natural selection. But if the development of the tail of the peahen had been checked only when it became incorveniently or dangerously great she would have retained a much longer tail than she actually possesses; for her tail is not nearly so long, relatively to the size of her body, as that of many female pheasants, nor longer than that of the female turkey. It must also be borne in mind that, in accordance with this view, as soon as the tail of the peahen became dangerously long, and its development was conse- quently checked, she would have continually reacted on her male progeny, and thus have prevented the peacock from acquiring his present magnificent train. We may, there- fore, infer that the length of the tail in the peacock and its shortness in the peahen are the result of the requisite variations in the male having been from the first trans- mitted to the male offspring alone. We are led to a nearly similar conclusion with respect to the length of the tail in the various species of pheasants. In the eared pheasant (Crossoptilon aicrituni) the tail is of equal length in both sexes, namely, sixteen or seventeen inches; in the common pheasant it is about twenty inches long in the male and twelve in the female; in Scemmerring's pheasant, thirty-seven inches in the male and only eight in the female; and lastly, in Reeve's pheasant it is sometimes actually seventy-two inches long in the male and sixteen in the female. Thus in the several species the tail of the female differs much in length irrespectively of that of the male; and this can be accounted for, as it seems to me, with much more probability, by the laws of inheritance that is, by the successive variations having been from the first more or less closely limited in their transmission to the male sex than by the agency of natural selection, resulting from the length of tail being more or less injuri- ous to the females of these several allied species. We may now consider Mr. Wallace's arguments in regard BIRDS. 515 to the sexual coloration of birds. He believes that the bright tints originally acquired through sexual selection by the males would in all, or almost all cases, have been trans- mitted to the females, unless the transference had been checked through natural selection. I -may here remind the reader that various facts opposed to this view have already been given under reptiles, amphibians, fishes and lepidoptera. Mr. "Wallace rests his belief chiefly, but not exclusively, as we shall see in the next chapter, on the fol- lowing statement,* that when both sexes are colored in a very conspicuous manner the nest is of such a nature as to conceal the sitting bird; but when there is a marked con- trast of color between the sexes, the male being gay and the female dull colored, the nest is open and exposes the sitting bird to vieAV. This coincidence, as far as it goes, certainly seems to favor the belief that the females which sit on open nests have been specially modified for the sake of protection; but we shall presently see that there is an- other and more probable explanation, namely, that con- spicuous females have acquired the instinct of building domed nests oftener than dull-colored birds. Mr. Wallace admits that there are, as might have been expected, some exceptions to his two rules, but it is a question whether the exceptions are not so numerous as seriously to invalidate them. There is, in the first place, much truth in the Duke of Argyll's remark f that a large domed nest is more con- spicuous to an enemy, especially to all tree-haunting carniv- orous animals, than a smaller open nest. Nor must we forget that with many birds which build open nests the male sits on the eggs and aids the female in feeding the young; this is the case, for instance, with Pyranga cestiva,% one of the most splendid birds in the United States, the male being vermilion and the female light brownish-green. Now if brilliant colors had been extremely dangerous to birds while sitting on their open nests the males in these cases would have suffered greatly. It might, however, be of such"paramouut importance to the male to be brilliantly colored in order to beat his rivals that this may have more than compensated some additional danger. *" Journal of Travel," edited by A. Murray, vol. i, 1868, p. 78. f "Journal of Travel," edited by A. Murray, vol. i, 1868, p. 281. jAudubon, " Ornithological Biography,-" vol. i, p. 233- 516 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Mr. "Wallace admits that with the king- crows (Dicrurus), orioles, and Pittidse, the females are conspicuously colored, yet build open nests; but he urges that the birds of the first group are highly pugnacious and could defend themselves; that those of the second group take extreme care in con- cealing their open nests, but this does not invariably hold good;* and that with the birds of the third group the females are brightly colored, chiefly on the under surface. Besides these cases, pigeons, which are sometimes brightly and almost always conspicuously colored, and which are notoriously liable to the attacks of birds of prey, offer a serious exception to the rule, for they almost always build open and exposed nests. In another large family, that of the humming-birds, all the species build open nests, yet with some of the most gorgeous species the sexes are alike; and in the majority, the females, though less brilliant than the males, are brightly colored. Nor can it be maintained that all female humming - birds, which are brightly colored, escape detection by their tints being green, for some display on their upper surfaces red, blue and other colors, f In regard to birds which build in holes or construct domed nests, other advantages, as Mr. Wallace remarks, besides concealment, are gained, such as shelter from the rain, greater warmth, and in hot countries protection from the sun;J so that it is no valid objection to his view that many birds having both sexes obscurely colored build con- cealed nests. The female horn-bill (Buceros), for instance, *Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. ii., p. 108. Gould's "Hand-book of the Birds of Australia," vol. i., p. 463. ( For instance, the female Eupetomcna macroura has the head and tail dark blue with reddish loins; the female Lampornis porpJiyru- rus is blackish green on the upper surface, with the lores and sides of the throat crimson; the female Eulampis jugularis has the top of the head and back green, but the loins and the tail are crimson. Many other instances of highly conspicuous females could be given. Seo Mr. Gould's magnificent work on this family. t Mr. Salvin noticed in Guatemala (" Ibis," 1864, p. 375) that hum- ming-birds were much more unwilling to leave their nests during very hot weather, when the sun was shining brightly, as if their eggs would be thus injured, than during cool, cloudy or rainy weather. 1 may specify, as instances of dull colored birds building con- cealed nests, the species belonging to eight Australian genera described in Gould's " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, pp. 340, 362, 365, 383, 387, 389, 391, 414. BIRDS. 517 of India and Africa, is protected during incubation with extraordinary care, for she plasters up with her own excre- ment the orifice of the hole in which she sits on her eggs, leaving only a small orifice through which the male feeds her; she is thus kept a close prisoner during the whole period of incubation;* yet female horn-bills are not more conspicuously colored than many other birds of equal size which build open nests. It is a more serious objection to Mr. Wallace's view, as is admitted by him, that in some few groups the males are brilliantly colored and the females obscure, and yet the latter hatch their eggs in domed nests. This is the case with the Grallinae of Australia, the superb warblers (Maluridae) of the same country, the sun-birds (NectariniEe), and with several of the Australian honey- suckers or Meliphagidae. f If we look to the birds of England we shall see that there is no close and general relation between the colors of the female and the nature of the nest which is constructed. About forty of our British birds (excluding those of large size which could defend themselves) build in holes in banks, rocks or trees or construct domed nests. If we take the colors of the female goldfinch, bullfinch or blackbird as a standard of the degree of conspicuousness, which is not highly dangerous to the sitting female, then out of the above forty birds the females of only twelve can be consid- ered as conspicuous to a dangerous degree, the remaining twenty - eight being inconspicuous. J Nor is there any *Mr. C. Home, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1869, p. 243. f On the nidification and colors of these latter species, see Gould's "Hand-book," etc., vol. i, pp. 504, 527. 1 1 have consulted, on this subject, Macgillivray's "British Birds/'' and though dr ubts may be entertained in some cases in regard to the degree of concealment of the nest and to the degree of conspicuous- ness of the female, yet the following birds, which all lay their eggs in holes or in domed nests, can hardly be considered, by the above standard, as conspicuous: Passer 2 specie, Sturnus, of which the female is considerably less brilliant than the male; Cinclus: Motal- lica boarula (?); Erith..cus (?); Fruticola, 2 sp. Saxicola; Ruticilla, 2 -sp.; Sylvia, 3 sp.; Parus, 3 sp.; Mecistura; Anorthura; Certhia; Sitta; Yunx; Muscicapa, 2 sp. ; Hirundo, 3 sp. ; and Cypselus. The females of the following 12 birds may be considered as conspicuous according to the same standard, viz., Pastor, Motacilla alba, Parus major and P. cseruleus, Upupa, Picus, 4 sp., Coracias, Alcedo and Merops. 518 THE DESCENT OF MAN, close relation within the same genus between a vftlf-pro- nounced difference in color between the sexes and the nature of the nest constructed. Thus the mnle house- rrrow (Passer domesticus) differs much from the female, male tree-sparrow (P. montaims] hardly at, all, and yet both build well-concealed nests. The two sexes of the common fly-catcher (Muscicapa grisola] can hardly be distinguished, while the sexes of the pied fly -catcher {M. luctuosa) differ considerably, and both species build in holes or conceal their nests. The female blackbird (Turdus merula) differs much, the female ring-ouzel (T. torquatus) differs less, and the female common thrush (T. musicus) hardly at all from their respective males; yet all build open nests. On the other hand, the not very distantly allied water-ouzel (Cinclus aquaiicus) builds a domed nest, and the sexes differ about as much as in the ring-ouzel. The black and red grouse (Tetrao tetrix and T. sections') build open nests in equally well-concealed spots, but in the one species the sexes differ greatly, and. in the other very little. Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, I cannot doubt, after reading Mr. Wallace's excellent essay, that looking to the birds of the world a large majority of the species in which the females are conspicuously colored (and in this case the males with rare exceptions are equally conspicuous) build concealed nests for the sake of protec- tion. Mr. Wallace enumerates* a long series of groups in which this rule holds good; but it will suffice here to give as instances the more familiar groups of kingfishers, tou- cans, trogons, puff -birds (Capitonida?), plantain - eaten (Musophagae), woodpeckers and parrots. Mr. Wallace believes that in these groups, as the males gradually ac- quired through sexual selection their brilliant colors, these were transferred to the females and were not eliminated b;y natural selection owing to the protection which they already enjoyed from their manner of nidification. According to this view, their present manner of nesting was acquired before their present colors. But it seems to me much more probable that in most cases, as the females were gradually rendered more and more brilliant from partaking of the colors of the male, they were gradually led to change * "Journal of Travel," edited by A. Murray, vol. i, p. 78. BIRDS. 519 their instincts (supposing that they originally built open nests) and to seek protection by building domed or con- cealed nests. No one who studies, for instance, Audubon's account of the differences in the nests of the same species in the Northern and Southern United States,* will feel any great difficulty in admitting that birds, either by a change (in the strict sense of the word) of their habits, or through the natural selection of so-called spontaneous variations of instinct, might readily be led to modify their manner of nesting. This way of viewing the relation, as far as it holds good, between the bright colors of female birds and their manner of nesting receives some support from certain cases occur- ring in the Sahara Desert. Here, as in most other deserts, various birds and many other animals have had their colors adapted in a wonderful manner to the tints of the surround- ing surface. Nevertheless there are, as I am informed by the Eev. Mr. Tristram, some curious exceptions to the rule; thus the male of the Monticola cyanea is conspicuous from his bright-blue color, and the female almost equally con- spicuous from her mottled brown and white plumage; both sexes of two species of Dromolasa are of a lustrous black; so that these three species are far from receiving protection from their colors, yet they are able to survive, for they have acquired the habit of taking refuge from danger in holes or crevices in the rocks. With respect to the above groups in which the females are conspicuously colored and build concealed nests, it is not necessary to suppose that each separate species had its nidifying instinct specially modified; but only that the early progenitors of each group were gradually led to build domed or concealed nests, and afterward transmitted this instinct, together with their bright colors, to their modified descendants. As far as it can be trusted the conclusion is interesting, that sexual selection, together with equal or nearly equal inheritance by both sexes, have indirectly determined the manner of nidification of whole groups of birds. According to Mr. Wallace, even in the groups in which * See many statements in the "Ornithological Biography." See also some curious observations on the nests of Italian birds by Eugenio Bettoni, in the " Atti deila Societa Italiana," vol. xi, 1869, V. 7, 520 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the females, from being protected in domed nests during incubation, have not had their bright colors eliminated through natural selection, the males often differ in a slight and occasionally in a considerable degree from the females. This is a significant fact, for such differences in color must be accounted for by some of the variations in the males having been from the first limited in transmission to the same sex; as it can hardly be maintained that these differences, espe- cially when very slight, serve as a protection to the female. Thus all the species in the splendid group of the Trogons build in holes; and Mr. Gould gives figures * of both sexes of twenty-five species, in all of which, with one partial exception, the sexes differ sometimes slightly, sometimes conspicuously in color the males being always finer than the females, though the latter are likewise beautiful. All the species of king-fishers build in holes, and with most of the species the sexes are equally brilliant, and thus far Mr. Wal- lace's rule holds good; but in some of the Australian species the colors of the females are rather less vivid than those of the male ; and in one splendidly colored species the sexes differ so much that they were at first thought to be specifically distinct, f Mr. R. B. Sharpe, who has espe- cially studied this group, has shown me some American species (Ceryle) in which the breast of the male is belted with black. Again, in Carcineutes, the difference between the sexes is conspicuous; in the male the upper surface is dull-blue banded with black, the lower surface being partly fawn-colored, and there is much red about the head; in the female the upper surface is reddish-brown banded with black, and the lower surface white with black markings. It is an interesting fact, as showing how the same peculiar style of sexual coloring often characterizes allied forms, that in three species of Dacelo the male differs from the female only in the tail being dull- 1 ' ue banded with black, while that of the female is brown with blackish bars; so that here the tail differ^ in color in the two sexes in exactly the same manner as the whole upper surface in the two sexes of Carcineutes. With parrots, which likewise build in holes, we find * See his " Monograph of the Trogonidae, " first edition, t Namely Cyanalcyon. Gould's "Hand-book to the Birds of Aus- tralia." vol. i, p. 183; see also pp. 130, 136. BIRDS. 521 analogous cases; in most of the species both sexes are brilliantly colored and indistinguishable, but in not a few species the males are colored rather more vividly than the females, or even very differently from them. Thus, besides other strongly marked differences, the whole under surface of the male king lory (Aprosmictus scapulatus) is scarlet, while the throat and chest of the female is green tinged with red; in the Euphema splendida there is a similar dif- ference, the face and wing coverts moreover of the female being of a paler blue than in the male. * In the family of the tits (Farina), which build concealed nests, the female of our common blue tomtit (Parus ccBruleus) is "much less brightly colored " than the male ; and in the magnificent Sultan yellow tit of India the difference is greater, f Again, in the great group of the woodpeckers, J the sexes are generally nearly alike, but in the Megapicus validus all those parts of the head, neck and breast which are crimson in the male are pale-brown in the female. As in several woodpeckers the head of the male is bright crimson, while that of the female is plain, it occurred to me that this color might possibly make the female dangerously conspicuous whenever she put her head out of the hole containing her nest, and consequently that this color, in accordance with Mr. Wallace's belief, had been eliminated. This view is strengthened by what Malherbe states with respect to Indopicus carlotta; namely, that the young females, like the young males, have some crimson about their heads, but that this color disappears in the adult female, while it is intensi- fied in the adult male. Nevertheless, the following con- siderations render this view extremely doubtful ; the male takes a fair share in incubation, and would be thus almost equally exposed to danger; both sexes of many species have their heads of an equally bright crimson; in other species * Every gradation of difference between the sexes may be followed in the parrots of Australia. See Gould's " Hand-book," etc., vol. ii, pp. 14-102. ' f Mac'gillivray's "British Birds," vol. ii, p. 433. Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. ii, p. 282. \ All the following facts are taken from M. Malherbe's magnificent "Monographic des Picidees," 1861. SAudubons "Ornithological Biography," vol. ii, p. 75; see also the Ibis," vol. i, p. 268. 522 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the difference between the sexes in the amount of scarlet is so slight that it can hardly make any appreciable difference in the danger incurred; and lastly, the coloring of the head in the two sexes often differs slightly in other ways. The cases, as yet given, of slight and graduated differ- ences in color between the males and females in the groups, in which, as a general rule, the sexes resemble each other, all relate to species which build domed or concealed nests. But similar gradations may likewise be observed in groups in which the sexes as a general rule resemble each other, but which build open nests. As I have before instanced the Australian parrots, so I may here instance, without giving any details, the Austra- lian pigeons.* It deserves especial notice that in all these cases the slight differences in plumage between the sexes are of the same general nature as the occasionally greater differences. A good illustration of this fact has already been afforded by those kingfishers in which either the tail alone or the whole upper surface of the plumage differs in the same manner in the two sexes. Similar cases may be observed with parrots and pigeons. The differences in color between the sexes of the same species are, also, of the same general nature as the differences in color between the dis- tinct species of the same group. For when in a group in which the sexes are usually alike the male differs considera- bly from the female he is not colored in a quite new style. Hence we may infer that within the same group the special colors of both sexes when they are alike, and the colors of the male when he differs slightly or even considerably from the female, have been in most cases determined by the same general cause; this being sexual selection. It is not probable, as has already been remarked, that differences in color between the sexes, when very slight, can be of service to the female as a protection. Assuming, however, that they are of service, they might be thought to be cases of transition; but we have no reason to believe that many species at any one time are undergoing change. Therefore we can hardly admit that the numerous females which differ very slightly in color from their males are now all commencing to become obscure for the sake of protection. * Gould's " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. ii, pp. 109-149. BIRDS. 523 Even if we consider somewhat more marked sexual differ- ences, is it probable, for instance, that the head of the female chaffinch, the crimson on the breast of the female bullfinch, the green of the female greenfinch, the crest of the female golden-crested wren have all been rendered less bright by the slow process of selection for the sake of pro- tection ? I cannot think so; and still less with the slight differences between the sexes of those birds which build concealed nests. On the other hand, the differences in color between the sexes, whether great or small, may to a large extent be explained on the principle of the successive variations acquired by the males through sexual selection, having been from the first more or less limited in their transmission to the females. That the degree of limitation should differ in different species of the same group will not surprise any one who has studied the laws of inheritance, for they are so complex that they appear to us in our igno- rance to be capricious in their actions.* As far as I can discover there are few large groups of birds in which all the species have both sexes alike and brilliantly colored, but I hear from Mr. Sclater that this ' appears to be the case with the Musophagae or plantain- eaters. Nor do I believe that any large group exists in which the sexes of all the species are widely dissimilar in color. Mr. Wallace informs me that the chatterers of South America ( Cotingidce) offer one of the best instances; but with some of the species in which the male has a splen- did red breast the female exhibits some red on her breast; and the females of other species show traces of the green and other colors of the males. Nevertheless we have a near approach to close sexual similarity or dissimilarity throughout several groups; and this, from what has ;just been said of the fluctuating nature of inheritance, is a somewhat surprising circumstance. But that the same laws should largely prevail with allied animals is not sur- prising. The domestic fowl has produced a great number of breeds and sub-breeds, and in these the sexes generally differ in plumage; so that it has been noticed as an un- usual circumstance when in certain sub -breeds they resemble each other. On the other hand, the domestic * See remarks to this effect in my work on " Variation uudei Domestication," vol. ii, chap. xii. 524 THE DESCENT OF MAN. pigeon has likewise produced a vast number of distinct breeds and sub-breeds, and in these, with rare exceptions, the two sexes are identically alike. Therefore if other species of Gallus and Columba were domesticated and varied it would not be rash to predict that similar rules of sexual similarily and dissimilarity depending on the form of transmission would hold good in both cases. In like manner the same form of transmission has generally prevailed under nature throughout the same groups, although marked exceptions to this rule occur. Thus within the same family, or even genus, the sexes may be identically alike or very different in color. Instances have already been given in the same genus, as with spar- rows, fly-catchers, thrashes and grouse. In the family of pheasants the sexes of almost all the species are wonder- fully dissimilar, but are quite alike in the eared pheasant or Crossoptilon auritum. In two species of Chloephaga, a genus of geese, the male cannot be distinguished from the females except by size; while in two others the sexes are so unlike that they might easily be mistaken for distinct species.* The laws of inheritance can alone account for the fol- lowing cases in which the female acquires late in life certain characters proper to the male, and ultimately comes to resemble him more or less completely. Here pro- tection can hardly have come into play. Mr. Blyth in- forms me that the females of Oriolus melanocepJialus and of some allied species when sufficiently mature to breed differ considerably in plumage from the adult males; but after the second or third moults they differ only in their beaks having a slight greenish tinge. In the dwarf bitterns (Ardetta), according to the same authority, " the male acquires his final livery at the first moult; the female not before the third or fourth moult; in the meanwhile she pre- sents an intermediate garb, which is ultimately exchanged for the same livery as that of the male." So, again, the female Falco peregrinus acquires her blue plumage more slowly than the male. Mr. Swinhoe states that with one of the drongo shrikes (Dicrurus macrocercus) the male, while almost a nestling, molts his soft brown plumage and becomes of a uniform glossy greenish-black; but the female *The " T bis," vol. vi, 1864, p. 122. BIRDS. 525 retains for a long time the Avhite striae and spots on the axillary feathers; and does not completely assume the uni- form black color of the male for three years. The same excellent observer remarks that in the spring of the second year the female spoon-bill (Platalea) of China resembles the male of the first year, and that apparently it is not until the third spring that she acquires the same adult plumage as that possessed by the male at a much earlier age. The female Bombycilla carolinensis differs very little from the male, but the appendages, which like beads of red sealing-wax ornament the wing-feathers,* are not developed in her so early in life as in the male. In the male of an Indian paroquet (Palceornis javanicus) the upper mandible is coral-red from his earliest youth, but in the female, as Mr, Blyth has observed with caged and wild birds, it is at first black and does not become red until the bird is at least a year old, at which age the sexes resemble each other in all respects. Both sexes of the wild turkey are ultimately furnished with a tuft of bristles on the breast, but in two-year-old birds the tuft is about four inches long in the male and hardly apparent in the female; when, however, the latter has reached her fourth year, it is from four to five inches in length, f These cases must not be confounded with those where diseased or old females abnormally assume masculine char- acters, nor with those where fertile females, while young, acquire the characters of the male, through variation or some unknown cause. J But all these cases have so much * When the male courts the female, these ornaments are vibrated, and " are shown off to great advantage," on the outstretched wings; A. Leith Adams, "Field and Forest Rambles/' 1873, p. 153. f On Ardetta, Translation of Cuvier's "Regne Animal," by Mr. Blyth, foot note p. 159. On the Peregrine Falcon, Mr. Blyth, in Oharlesworth's "Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. i, 1837, p. 304. On Dicrurus, " Ibis," 1863, p. 44, On the Platalea, " Ibis," vol. vi, 1864, p 366 On the Bombycilla, Audubon's " Ornitholog. Biography," vol. i, p. 229. On the Palaeornis, see, also, Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. i, p. 263. On the wild turkey, Audubon, ibid, vol. i, p. 15; but I hear from Judge Caton that in Illinois the female very rarely acquires a tuft. Analogous cases with the females of Petrocossyphus are given by Mr. R. Sharpe, " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1872, p. 496. JOf these latter cases Mr. Blyth has recorded (Translation of Cuvier's "Regne Animal," p. 158) various instances with Lanius, Ruticilla, Linaria and Anas. Audubon has also recorded a similar case (" Ornith. Biog.," vol. v, p. 519) with Pyranga wsti'oa. 526 THE DESCENT OF MAN. in common that they depend, according to the hypothesis of pangenesis, on gemmules derived from each part of the male being present, though latent, in the female; their development following on some slight change in the elective affinities of her constituent tissues. A few words must be added on changes of plumage in relation to the season of the year. From reasons formerly assigned there can be little doubt that the elegant plumes, long pendant feathers, crests, etc., of egrets, herons and many other birds, which are developed and retained only during the summer, serve for ornamental and nuptial pur- poses, though common to both sexes. The female is thus ren- dered more conspicuous during the period of incubation than during the winter ; but such birds as herons and egrets would be able to defend themselves. As, however, plumes would probably be inconvenient and certainly of no use during the winter, it is possible that the habit of moulting twice in the year may have been gradually acquired through natural selection for the sake of casting off inconvenient ornaments during the winter. But this view cannot be extended to the many waders, whose summer and winter plumages differ very little in color. With defenseless spe- cies, in which both sexes, or the males alone, become extremely conspicuous during the breeding-season or when the males acquire at this season such long wing or tail feathers as to impede their flight, as with Cosmetornis and Vidua it certainly at first appears highly probable that the second moult has been gained for the special pur- pose of throwing off these ornaments. We must, however, remember that many birds, such as some of the birds of paradise, the Argus pheasant and peacock, do not cast their plumes during the winter; and it can hardly be maintained that the constitution of these birds, at least of the Gallinaceae, renders a double moult impossible, for the ptarmigan moults thrice in the year.* Hence it must be considered as doubtful whether the many species which moult their ornamental plumes or lose their bright colors during the winter, have acquired this habit on account of the inconvenience or danger which they would otherwise have suffered. * See Gould's " Birds of Great Britain." BIRDS. 527 I conclude, therefore, that the habit of moulting twice in the year was in most or all cases first acquired for some distinct purpose, perhaps for gaining a warmer winter cov- ering; and that variations in the plumage occurred during the summer were accumulated through sexual selection, and transmitted to the offspring at the same season of the year ; that such variations were inherited either by both sexes or by the males alone, according to the form of inher- itance which prevailed. This appears more probable than that the species in all cases originally tended to retain their ornamental plumage during the winter, but were saved from this through natural selection, resulting from the inconvenience or danger thus caused. I have endeavored in this chapter to show that the argu- ments are not trustworthy in favor of the view that weap- ons, bright colors, and various ornaments are now confined to the males owing to the conversion, by natural selection, of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes, into transmission to the male sex alone. It is also doubtful whether the colors of many female birds are due to the preservation, for the sake of protection, of variations which were from the first limited in their transmission to the female sex. But it will be convenient to defer any further discussion on this subject until I treat, in the fol- lowing chapter, of the differences in plumage between the young and old. 528 THE DESCENT OF MAN. CHAPTEK XVI. BIRDS concluded. The immature plumage in relation to the character of the plumage in both sexes when adult Six classes of cases Sexual differences between the males of closely allied or representative species The female assuming the characters of the male Plumage of the young in relation to the summer and winter plumage of the adults On the increase of beauty in the birds of the world Protective coloring Conspicuously colored birds Novelty appre- ciated Summary of the four chapters on birds. WE must now consider the transmission of characters as limited by age, in reference to sexual selection. The truth and importance of the principle of inheritance at corre- sponding ages need not here be discussed, as enough has already been said on the subject. Before giving the several rather complex rules or classes of cases under which the differences in plumage between the young and the old, as far as known to me, may be included, it will be well to make a few preliminary remarks. With animals of all kinds, when the adults differ in color from the young, and the colors of the latter are not, as far as we can see, of any special service, they may generally be attributed, like various embryological structures, to the retention of a former character. But this view can be maintained with confidence only when the young of several species resemble each other closely, and likewise resemble other adult species belonging to the same group; for the latter are the living proofs that such a state of things was formerly possible. Young lions and pumas are marked with feeble stripes or rows of spots, and as many allied species both young and old are similarly marked no believer in evolution will doubt that the progenitor of the lion and puma was a striped animal, and that the young have retained vestiges of the stripes like the kittens of black cats, which are not in the least striped when grown up. Many species of deer, BIRDS. 529 which when mature are not spotted, are while young cov- ered with white spots, as are likewise some few species in the adult state. So again the young in the whole family of pigs (Suidae), and in certain rather distantly allied animals, such as the tapir, are marked with dark longitudinal stripes; but here we have a character apparently derived from an extinct progenitor, and now preserved by the young alone. In all such cases the old have had their colors changed in the course of time, while the young have remained but little altered, and this has been effected through the principle of inheritance at corresponding ages. This same principle applies to many birds belonging to various groups in which the young closely resemble each other, and differ much from their respective adult parents. The young of almost all the Gallinaceae and of some distantly allied birds, such as ostriches, are covered with longitu- dinally striped down; but this character points back to a state of things so remote that it hardly concerns us. Young cross-bills (Loxia) have at first straight beaks like those of other finches, and in their immature striated plumage they resemble the mature redpole and female siskin, as well as the young of the goldfinch, greenfinch and some other allied species. The young of many kinds of buntings (Emberiza) resemble one another, and likewise the adult states of the common bunting, E. miliaria. In almost the whole large group of thrushes the young have their breasts spotted a character which is retained throughout life by many species, but is quite lost by others, as by the Turdus inifjratorius. So again with "many thrushes, the feathers .on the back are mottled before they are moulted for the first time, and this character is retained for life by certain eastern species. The young of many species of shrikes (Lanius), of some woodpeckers and of an Indian pigeon (Chalcopliaps indicus) are transversely striped on the under surface; and certain allied species or whole genera are similarly marked when adult. In some closely allied and resplendent Indian cuckoos (Chrysococcyx) the mature species' differ considerably from one another in color, but the young cannot be distinguished. The young of an Indian goose (Sarkidiornis melanonotus) closely resemble in plumage an allied genus, Dendrocygna, when mature.* * In regard to thrushes, shrikes and woodpeckers, see Mr. Blyth, in Charlesworth's "Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. i, 1837, p. 304; also 530 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Similar facts will hereafter be given in regard to certain herons. Young black grouse ( Tetrao tetrix) resemble the young as well as the old of certain other species, for in- stance, the red grouse or T. scoticus. Finally, as Mr. Blyth, who has attended closely to this subject, has well remarked, the natural affinities of many species are best exhibited in their immature plumage; and as the true affinities of all organic beings depend on their descent from a common progenitor, this remark strongly confirms the belief that the immature plumage approximately shows us the former or ancestral condition of the species. Although many young birds belonging to various famb lies thus give us a glimpse of the plumage of their remote progenitors, yet there are many other birds, both dull-, colored and bright-colored, in which the young closely resemble their parents. In such cases the young of tha different species cannot resemble each other more closely than do the parents; nor can they strikingly resemble allied forms when adult. They give us but little insight into the plumage of their progenitors, excepting in so far that when the young and the old are colored in the same general manner throughout a whole group of species, it is probable that their progenitors were similarly colored. We may now consider the classes of cases under which the differences and resemblances between the plumage of the young and the old, in both sexes or in one sex alone, may be grouped. Rules of this kind were first enounced by Ouvier; but with the progress of knowledge they require some modification and amplification. This I have at- tempted to do) as far as the extreme complexity of the subject permits, from information derived from varioua sources; but a full essay on this subject by some competent ornithologist is much needed. In order to ascertain to what extent each rule prevails I have tabulated the facts given in four great works, namely, by Macgillivray on thd birds of Britain, Audubon on those of North America, Jerdon on those of India, and Gould on those of Australia. foot-note to his translation of Cuvier's " Regne Animal," p. 159. I give the case of Loxia on Mr. Blyth's information. On thrushes, see also Audubon, "Ornith. Biography," vol. ii, p. 195. On Chryso. coccyx and Chalcophaps, Blyth, as quoted in Jerdon's " Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 485. On "Sarkidiornis, Blyth, in "Ibis," 1867, p, 175. BIRDS. 531 I may here premise, first, that the several cases or rules graduate into each other; and secondly, that when the young are said to resemble their parents it is not meant that they are identically alike, for their colors are almost always less vivid, and the feathers are softer and often of a different shape. RULES OB CLASSES OF CASES. I. When the adult male is more beautiful or conspicuous than the adult female, the young of both sexes in their first plumage closely resemble the adult female, as with the common fowl and peacock; or, as occasionally occurs, they resemble her much more closely than they do the adult male. II. When the adult female is more conspicuous than the adult male, as sometimes, though rarely, occurs, the young of both sexes in their first plumage resemble the adult male. III. When the adult male resembles the adult female, the young of both sexes have a peculiar first plumage of their own, as with the robin. IV. When the adult male resembles the adult female, the young of both sexes in their first plumage resemble the adults, as with the kingfisher, many parrots, crows, hedge- warblers. V. When the adult of both sexes have a distinct winter and summer plumage, whether or not the male differs from the female, the young resemble the adults of both sexes in their winter dress, or much more rarely in their summer dress, or they resemble the females alone. Or the young may have an intermediate character; or again they may differ greatly from the adults in both their seasonal plumages. VI. In some few cases the young in their first plumage differ from each other according to sex; the young males resembling more or less closely the adult males, and the young females more or less closely the adult females. CLASS I. In this class the young of both sexes more or less closely resemble the adult female, while the adult male differs from the adult female, often in the most conspicu- ous manner. Innumerable instances in all orders could be 532 THE DESCENT OF MAN. given; it will suffice to call to mind the common pheasant, duck and house-sparrow. The cases under this class gradu- ate into others. Thus the two sexes when adult may differ BO slightly, and the young so slightly from the adults, that it is doubtful whether such cases ought to come under the present, or under the third or fourth classes. So, again, the young of the two sexes, instead of being quite alike, may differ in a slight degree from each other, as in our sixth class. These transitional cases, however, are few, or at least are not strongly pronounced, in comparison with those which come strictly under the present class. The force of the present law is well shown in those groups, in which, as a general rule, the two sexes and the young are all alike; for when in these groups the male does differ from the female, as with certain parrots, kingfishers, pigeons, etc., the young of both sexes resemble the adult female.* We see the same fact exhibited still more clearly in certain anomalous cases; thus the male of Heliotlirix auriculata (one of the humming-birds) differs conspicuously from the female in having a splendid gorget and fine ear-tufts, but the female is remarkable from having a much longer tail than that of the male; now the young of both sexes resemble (with the exception of the breast being spotted with bronze) the adult female in all other respects, including the length of her tail, so that the tail of the male actually becomes shorter as he reaches maturity, which is a most unusual circumstance, f Again, the plumage of the male goosander (Mergus merganser) is more conspicuously colored than that of the female, with the scapular and secondary wing- feathers much longer; but * See, for instance, Mr. Gould's account (" Hand-book to the Birds of Australia/' vol. i, p. 133) of Cyanalcyon (one of the kingfishers), in which, however, the young male, though resembling the adult female, is less brilliantly colored. In some species of Dacelo the males have blue tails, and the females brown ones; and Mr. R. B. Sharpe informs me that the tail of the young male of D. gaiidichaudi is at first brown. Mr. Gould has described (ibid, vol. ii, pp. 14, 20, 37) the sexes and the young of certain black cockatoos and of the King Lory, with which the same rule prevails. Also Jerdon (" Birds of India," vol. 5, p. 260) on the Palceornis rosa, in which the young are more like the female than the male. See Audubon (" O'rnith. Biograph.," vol. ii, p. 475) on the two sexes and the young of Co- lumba passerina. f I owe this information to Mr. Gould, who showed me the speci- mens; see also his " Introduction to the Trochilidae," 1861, p. 120. BIRDS. 533 differently from what occurs, as far as I know in any other bird, the crest of the adult male, though broader than that of the female, is considerably shorter, being only a little above an inch in length; the crest of the female being two and a half inches long. Now the young of both sexes entirely resemble the adult female, so that their crests are actually of greater length, though narrower than in the adult male.* When the young and the females closely resemble each other and both differ from the males, the most obvious con- clusion is that the males alone have been modified. Even in the anomalous cases of the Heliothrix and Mergus, it is probable that originally both adult sexes were furnished the one species with a much elongated tail and the other with a much elongated crest these characters having since been partially lost by the adult males from some unexplained cause, and transmitted in their diminished state to their male offspring alone, when arrived at the corresponding age of maturity. The belief that in the present class the male alona has been modified, as far as the differences between the male and the female together with her young are concerned, is strongly supported by some remarkable facts recorded by Mr. Blyth,f with respect to closely allied species which represent each other in distinct countries. For with several of these representative species the adult males have undergone a certain amount of change and can be distinguished; the females and the young from the dis- tinct countries being indistinguishable, and therefore the case with certain certain honey-suckers (Nee- certain kingfishers (Tany- siptera), Kalij pheasants (Gallophasis) and tree-partridges (Arboricola). In some analogous cases, namely, with birds having a different summer and winter plumage, but with the two sexes nearly alike, certain closely allied species can easily be dis- tinguished in their summer or nuptial plumage, yet are " * Macgillivray, " Hist. Brit. Birds," vol. v, pp. 207, 214 f See his admirable paper in the " Journal of the Asiatic Soc. of Bengal," vol. xix, 1850, p. 223; see also Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. i, introduction, p. 29. In regard to Tanysiptera, Prof. Schlegel told Mr. Blyth that he could distinguish several distinct races, solely by comparing the adult males. 534 THE DESCENT OF MAN. indistinguishable in their winter as well as in their imma- ture plumage. This is the case with some of the closely allied Indian wag- tails or Motacillae. Mr. Swinhoe * informs me that three species of Ardeola, a genus of herons, which represent one another on separate conti- nents, are " most strikingly different " when ornamented with their summer plumes, but are hardly, if at all, dis- tinguishable during the winter. The young also of these three species in their immature plumage closely resemble the adults in their winter dress. This case is all the more interesting, because with two other species of Ardeola both sexes retain, during the winter and summer, nearly the same plumage as that possessed by the three first spe- cies during the winter and in their immature state; and this plumage, which is common to several distinct species at different ages and seasons, probably shows us how the progenitors of the genus were colored. In all these cases, the nuptial plumage which we may assume was originally acquired by the adult males during the breeding-season, and transmitted to the adults of both sexes at the corre- sponding season, has been modified, while the winter ?nd immature plumages have been left unchanged. The question naturally arises, how is it that in these latter cases the winter plumage of both sexes, and in the former cases the plumage of the adult females, as well as the immature plumage of the young, have not been at all affected? The species which represent each other in distinct countries will almost always have been exposed to somewhat different conditions, but we can hardly attribute to this action the modification of the plumage in the males alone, seeing that the females and the young, though simi- larly exposed, have not been affected. Hardly any fact shows us more clearly how subordinate in importance is the direct action of the conditions of life, in comparison with the accumulation through selection of indefinite vari- ations, than the surprising difference between the sexes of many birds; for both will have consumed the same food, and have been exposed to the same climate. Nevertheless we are not precluded from believing that in the course of *See also Mr. Swinhoe, in "Ibis," July, 1863, p. 131; and a pre- vious paper, with an extract from a note by Mr. Blyth, in " Ibis," Jan. 1861, p. 24. BIRDS. 535 time new conditions may produce some direct effect either on both sexes, or from their constitutional differences chiefly on one sex. We see only that this is subordinate in importance to the accumulated results of selection. Judg- ing, however, from a wide-spread analogy, when a species migrates into a new country (and this must precede the formation of representative species), the changed condi- tions to which they will almost always have been exposed will cause them to undergo a certain amount of fluctuating variability. In this case sexual selection, which depends on an element liable to change the taste or admiration oi the female will have had new shades of color or other dif- ferences to act on and accumulate; and as sexual selection is ihvays at work, it would (from what we know of the results on domestic animals of man's unintentional selec- tion) be surprising if animals inhabiting separate districts, which can never cross and thus blend their newly acquired characters, were not, after a sufficient lapse of time, differ- ently modified. These remarks likewise apply to the nuptial or summer plumage, whether confined to the males or common to both sexes. Although the females of the above closely allied or rep- resentative species, together with their young, differ hardly at all from one another, so that the males alone can be dis- tinguished, yet the females of most species within the same genus obviously differ from each other. The differences, however, are rarely as great as between the males. We see this clearly in the whole family of the Gallinacese ; the females, for instance, of the common and Japan pheasant, and especially of the gold and Amherst pheasant of the silver pheasant and the wild fowl resemble one another very closely in color, while the males differ to an extraor- dinary degree. So it is with the females of most of the Cotingidae, Fringillidse, and many other families. There can indeed be no doubt that, as a general rule, the females have been less modified than the males. Some few birds, however, offer a singular and inexplicable exception; thus the females of Paradisea apoda and P. papuana differ from each other more than do their respective males;* the female of the latter species having the under surface pure white, while the female P. apoda is deep brown beneath. So, * Wallace, " The Malay Archipelago," vol. ii, 1869, p. 394. 536 THE DESCENT OF MAN. again, as I hear from Prof. Newton, the males of two species of Oxynotus (shrikes), which represent each other in the Islands of Mauritius and Bourbon,* differ but little in color, while the females differ much. In the Bourbon species the female appears to have partially retained an immature condition of plumage, for at first sight she "might be taken for the young of the Mauritian species." These differences may be compared with those inexplicable ones which occur independently of man's selection in certain sub-breeds of the game-fowl, in which the females are very different, while the males can hardly be distin- guished, f As I account so largely by sexual selection for the differ- ences between the males of allied species, how can the differences between the females be accounted for in all ordinary cases? We need not here consider the species which belong to distinct genera; for with these, adaptation to different habits of life, and other agencies, will have come into play. In regard to the differences between the females within the same genus it appears to me almost cer- tain, after looking through various large groups, that the chief agent has been the greater or less transference to the female of the characters acquired by the males through sexual selection. In the several British finches the two sexes differ either very slightly or considerably; and if we compare the females of the greenfinch, chaffinch, goldfinch, bullfinch, crossbill, sparrow, etc., we shall see that they differ from one another chiefly in the points in which they partially resemble their respective males; and the colors of the males may safely be attributed to sexual selection. With many gallinaceous species the sexes differ to an extreme degree, as with the peacock, pheasant and fowl, while with other species there has been a partial or even complete transference of character from the male to the female. The females of the several species of Polyplectron exhibit in a dim condition, and chiefly on the tail, the splendid ocelli of their males. The female partridge differs from the male only in the red mark on her breast being smaller; and the female wild turkey only in her colors being * These species are described with colored figures, by M. F- Pollen, in " Ibis," 1866, p. 275. f ' Variation of Animals, etc., under Domestication," vol. i, p. 251. BIRDS. 537 much duller. In the guinea-fowl the two sexes are indis- tinguishable. There is no improbability in the plain, though peculiarly spotted, plumage of this latter bird having been acquired through sexual selection by the males, and then transmitted to both sexes; for it is not essentially different from the much more beautifully spotted plumage, characteristic of the males alone of the Tragopan pheasants. It should be observed that in some instances the trans- ference of characters from the male to the female has been effected apparently at a remote period, the male having subsequently undergone great changes without transferring to the female any of his later gained characters. For in- stance, the female and the young of the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix] resemble pretty closely both sexes and the young of the red grouse (T. scoticus); and we may conse- quently infer that the black grouse is descended from some ancient species, of which both sexes were colored in nearly the same manner as the red grouse. As both sexes of this latter species are more distinctly barred during the breed- ing-season than at any other time, and as the male differs slightly from the female in his more strongly pronounced red and brown tints,* we may conclude that his plumage has been influenced by sexual selection, at least to a certain extent. If so, we may further infer that the nearly similar plumage of the female black grouse was similarly produced at some former period. But since this period the male black grouse has acquired his fine black plumage with his forked and outwardly curled tail-feathers; but of these char- acters there has hardly been any transference to the female, excepting that she shows in her tail a trace of the curved fork. We may therefore conclude that the females of distinct though allied species have often had their plumage rendered more or less different by the transference of various degrees- of characters acquired by the males through sexual selec- tion both during former and recent times. But it deserves jespecial attention that brilliant colors have been transferred much more rarely than other tints. For instance, the male of the red-throated blue-breast (Cyanecula suecicd) has a rich blue breast, including a sub-triangular red mark; *Macgillivray, "Hist. British Birds." vol. i, pp. 173-174. 538 THE DESCENT OF MAN. now marks of nearly the same shape have been transferred to the female, but the central space is fulvous instead of red and is surrounded by mottled instead of blue feathers. The Gallinaceae offer many analogous cases; for none of the species, such as partridges, quails, guinea-fowl, etc., in which the colors of the plumage have been largely trans- ferred from the male to the female, are brilliantly colored. This is well exemplified with the pheasants, in which the male is generally so much more brilliant than the female; but with the eared and cheer pheasants (Crossoptilon auritum and Phasianus wctllicJiii) the sexes closely resem- ble each other and their colors are dull. We may go so far as to believe that if any part of the plumage in the males of these two pheasants had been brilliantly colored it would not have been transferred to the females. These facts strongly support Mr. Wallace's view that with birds which are exposed to much danger during incubation, the trans- ference of bright colors from the male to the female has been checked through natural selection. We must not, however, forget that another explanation, before given, is possible; namely, that the males which varied and became bright, while they were young and inexperienced, would have been exposed to much danger and would generally have been destroyed; the older and more cautious males, on the other hand, if they varied in a like manner, would not only have been able to survive, but would have been favored in their rivalry with other males. Now variations occurring late in life tend to be transmitted exclusively to the same sex, so that in this case extremely bright tints would not have been transmitted to the females. On the other hand, ornaments of a less conspicuous kind, such as those possessed by the eared and cheer pheasants, would not have been dangerous, and if they appeared during early youth would generally have been transmitted to both In addition to the effects of the partial transference of characters from the males to the females some of the differ- ences between the females of closely allied species may be attributed to the direct or definite action of the conditions of life.* With the males any such action would generally * See, on this subject, chap, xxiii, in the " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication." BIRDS. 539 have been masked by the brilliant colors gained through sexual selection; but not so with the females. Each of the endless diversities in plumage which we see in our domes- ticated birds is, of course, the result of some definite cause; and, under natural and more uniform conditions, some one tint, assuming that it was in no way injurious, would almost certainly sooner or later prevail. The free intercrossing of the many individuals belonging to the same species would ultimately tend to make any change of color thus induced uniform in character. No one doubts that both sexes of many birds have had their 'colors adapted for the sake of protection; and it is possible that the females alone of some species may have been modified for this end. Although it would be a difficult, perhaps an impossible, process, as shown in the last chapter, to convert one form of transmission into another through selection, there would not be the least difficulty in adapting the colors of the female, independently of those of the male, to surrounding objects, through the accumulation of varia- tions which were from the first limited in their transmission to the female sex. If the variations were not thus limited the bright tints of the male would be deteriorated or de- stroyed. Whether the females alone of many species have been thus specially modified is at present very doubtful. I wish I could follow Mr. Wallace to the full extent; for the admission would remove some difficulties. Any variations which were of no service to the female as a protection would be at once obliterated, instead of being lost simply by not being selected, or from free intercross- ing, or from being eliminated when transferred to the male and in any way injurious to him. Thus the plumage of the female would be kept constant in character. It would also be a relief if we could admit that the obscure tints of both sexes of many birds had been acquired and preserved for the sake of protection, for example, of the hedge-warbler or kitty- wren (Accentor modularis and Troglodytes vulgaris), with respect to which we have no sufficient evidence of the 'action 'of sexual selection. We ought, however, to be cau- tious in concluding that colors which appear to us dull are not attractive to the females of certain species; we should bear in mind such cases as that of the common house-sparrow, in which the male differs much from the female, but does not exhibit any bright tints. No one 540 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. probably will dispute that many gallinaceous birds which: live on the open ground have acquired their present colors, at least in part, for the sake of protection. We know how well they are thus concealed ; we know that ptarmigans, while changing from their winter to their summer plumage, both of which are protective, suffer greatly from birds of prey. But can we believe that the very slight differences in tints and markings between, for instance, the female black- grouse and red-grouse serve as a protection? Are partridges, as they are now colored, better protected than if they had resembled quails? Do the slight differences between the females of the common pheasant, the Japan and gold pheasants, serve as a pro- tection, or might not their plumages have been inter- changed with impunity? From what Mr. Wallace hap observed of the habits of certain gallinaceous birds in the east, he thinks that such slight differences are beneficial. For myself, I will only say that I am not convinced. Formerly when I was inclined to lay much stress on pro- tection as accounting for the duller colors of female birds, it occurred to me that possibly both sexes and the young might aboriginally have been equally bright colored ; but that subsequently, the females from the danger incurred during incubation, and the young from being inexperienced, had been rendered dull as a protection. But this view is not supported by any evidence, and is not probable; for we thus in imagination expose during past times the females and the young to danger, from which it has sub- sequently been necessary to shield their modified descend- ants. "Vye have, also, to reduce, through a gradual process of selection, the females and the young to almost exactly the same tints and markings, and to transmit them to the corresponding sex and period of life. On the supposition that the females and the young have partaken during each stage of the process of modification of a tendency to be as brightly colored as the males, it is also a somewhat strange fact that the females have never been rendered dull colored without the young participating in the same change; for there are no instances, as far as I can discover, of species with the females dull and the young bright colored. A partial exception, however, is offered by the young of cer- tain woodpeckers, for they have " the whole upper part of the head tinged with red/' which &f terwayd, either BIRDS 541 into a mere circular red line in the adults of both sexes, or quite disappears in the adult females.* Finally, with respect to our present class of cases, the most probable view appears to be that successive variations in brightness or in other ornamental characters occurring in the males at a rather late period of life have alone been preserved; and that most or all of these variations, owing to the late period of life at which they appeared, have been from the first transmitted only to the adult male offspring. Any variations in brightness occurring in the females or in the young would have been of no service to them, and would not have been selected; and moreover, if dangerous would have been eliminated. Thus the females and the young will either have been left unmodified, or (as is much more common) will have been partially modi- fied by receiving through transference from the males some of his successive variations. Both sexes have perhaps been directly acted on by the conditions of life to which they have long been exposed; but the females from not being otherwise much modified will best exhibit any such effects. These changes and all others will have been kept uniform by the free intercrossing of many individuals. In some cases, especially with ground birds, the females and the young may possibly have been modified, independently of the males, for the sake of protection so as to have acquired the same dull-colored plumage. CLASS II. When the adult female is more conspicuous than the adult male the young of both sexes in their first plumage resemble the adult male. This class is exactly the reverse of the last, for the females are here brighter colored or more conspicuous than the males; and the young, as far as they are known, resemble the adult males instead of the adult females. But the difference between the sexes is never nearly so great as with many birds in the first class, and the cases are comparatively rare. Mr. Wallace, who \first called attention to the singular relation which exists between the less bright colors of the males and their per- forming the duties of incubation, lays great stress on this *Audubon, "Ornith. Biography," vol. i, p. 193. Macgillivray, " Hist. Brit. Birds," voL iii, p. 85. See also the case before given of Indopicus carlotta. 542 THE DESCENT OF MAN. point* as a crucial test that obscure colors have been ac- ^uired for the sake of protection during the period of nest- ing. A different view seems to me more probable. As the cases are curious and not numerous I will briefly give all that I have been able to find. In one section of the genus Turnix, quail-like birds, the female is invariably larger than the male ('being nearly twice as large in one of the Australian species), and this is an unusual circumstance with the Gallinacese. In most of the species the female is more distinctly colored and brighter than the male,f but in some few species the sexes are alike. In Turmx taigoor of India the male " wants the black on the throat and neck, and the whole tone of the plumage is lighter and less pronounced than that of the female." The female appears to be noisier, and is cer- tainly much more pugnacious than the male; so that the females and not the males are often kept by the natives for fighting, like gamecocks. As male birds are exposed by the English bird-catchers for a decoy near a trap, in order to catch other males by exciting their rivalry, so the females of this Turnix are employed in India. When thus ex- posed the females soon begin their "loud, purring call, which can be heard a long way off, and any females within ear-shot run rapidly to the spot and commence fighting with the caged bird." In this way from twelve to twenty birds, all breeding-females, may be caught in the course of a single day. The natives assert that the females after laying their eggs associate in flocks, and leave the males to sit on them. There is no reason to doubt the truth of this assertion, which is supported by some observa- tions made in China by Mr. Swinhoe.J Mr. Blyth believes that the young of both sexes resemble the adult male. The females of the three species of painted snipes (Rhynchaea, fig. 62) " are not only larger but much more *" Westminster Review," July, 1867, and A. Murray, "Journal of Travel," 1868, p. 83. fFor the Australian species, see Gould's " Hand-book," etc., vol. ii, pp. 178, 180, 186, 188. In the British Museum specimens of the Australian Plain- wanderer (Pedionomus torquatus) may be seen, showing similar sexual differences. JJerdon, "Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 596. Mr. Svvinhoe, in " Ibis," 1865, p. 542; 1866, pp. 131, 405. BIRDS 543 richly colored than the males."* With all other birds in which the trachea differs in structure in the two sexes it is more developed and complex in the male than in the female; but/ in the Rliynclicea aitstraUs it is simple in the male, while in the female it makes four distinct convolu- Fig. 62. Rhynchaea capensis (from Brehm). tions before entering the lungs, f The female, therefore, of this species has acquired an eminently masculine char- acter. Mr. Blyth ascertained, by examining many speci- mens, that the trachea is not convoluted in either sex of R. bengalensis, which species resembles R. australis so closely that it can hardly be distinguished except by its shorter toes. This fact is another striking instance of the * Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 677. f Gould's " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. ii, p. 275. 544: THE DESCENT OF MAN. law that secondary sexual characters are often widely dif, ferent in closely allied forms, though it is a very rare cir- cumstance when such differences relate to the female sex. The young of both sexes of R. bengalensis in their first plumage are said to resemble the mature male.* There is also reason to believe that the male undertakes the duty of incubation, for Mr. Swinhoe f found the females before the close of the summer associated in flocks, as occurs with the [females of the Turnix. The females of Phalaropus fulicarius and P. liyperloreus are larger, and in their summer plumage " more gayly attired than the males." But the difference in color between the sexes is far from conspicuous. According to Prof. Steen- strup, the male alone of P. fulicarius undertakes the duty of incubation; this is likewise shown by the state of his breast-feathers during the breeding-season. The female of the dotterel plover (Eudromias morinellus) is larger than the male, and has the red and black tints on the lower sur- face, the white crescent on the breast and the stripes over the eyes more strongly pronounced. The male also takes at least a share in hatching the eggs; but the female like- wise attends to the young. \ I have not been able to dis- cover whether with these species the young resemble the adult males more closely than the adult females; for the comparison is somewhat difficult to make on account of the double moult. Turning now to the ostrich order; the male of the common cassowary (Casuanus galeatus) would bethought by any one to be the female, from his smaller size and from the appendages and naked skin about his head being much less brightly colored; and I am informed by Mr. Bartlett that in the Zoological Gardens it is certainly the male alone * " The Indian Field," Sept., 1858, p. 3. f " Ibis," 1866, p. 298. | For these several statements, see Mr. Gould's "Birds of Great Britain." Prof. Newton informs me that he has long been convinced, from his own observations and from those of others, that the males of the above-named species take either the whole or a large share of the duties of incubation, and that they "show much greater devo- tion toward their young, when in danger, than do the females." So it is, as he informs me, with Limosa litpponica and some few other waders, in which the females are larger and have more strongly con- trasted colors than the males. BIRDS. 546 who sits on the eggs and takes care of the young.* The female is said by Mr. T. W. Wood f to exhibit during the breeding- season a most pugnacious disposition ; and her wattles then become enlarged and more brilliantly colored. So again the female of one of the emus (Dromceus irroratus) is considerably larger than the male, and she possesses a slight top-knot, but is otherwise indistinguishable in plumage. She appears, however, " to have greater power, when angry or otherwise excited, of erecting, like a turkey-cock, the feathers of her neck and breast. She is usually the more courageous and pugilistic. She makes a deep, hollow, gut- tural boom especially at night, sounding like a small gong. The male has a slenderer frame and is more docile, with no voice beyond a suppressed hiss when angry, or a croak." He not only performs the whole duty of incubation, but has to defend the young from their mother; " for as soon as she catches sight of her progeny she becomes violently agitated, and notwithstanding the resistance of the father appears to use her utmost endeavors to destroy them. For months afterward it is unsafe to put the parents together, violent quarrels being the inevitable result, in which the female generally comes oif conqueror/']; So that with this emu we have a complete reversal not only of the parental and incubating instincts, but of the usual moral qualities of the two sexes; the females being savage, quarrelsome and noisy, the males gentle and good. The case is very dif- ferent with the African ostrich, for the male is somewhat larger than the female and has finer plumes, with more strongly contrasted colors; nevertheless he undertakes the whole duty of incubation. *The natives of Ceram (Wallace, "Malay Archipelago," vol. ii, p. 1 50) assert that the male and female sit alternately on the eggs; but this assertion, as Mr. Bartlett thinks, may be accounted for by the female visiting the nest to lay her eggs. t " The Student," April, 1870, p. 124. J See. the excellent account of the habits of this bird under con- finement, by Mr. A. W. Bennett, in " Land and Water." May, 1868, p. 233. ' Mr. Sclater, on the incubation of the Struthiones, " Proc. Zool. Soc.," June 9, 1863. So it is with the Rhea darwinii: Capt. Mus- ters says ("At Home with the Patagonians," 1871, p. 128), that the male is larger, stronger and swifter than the female, and of slightly darker colors; yet he takes sole charge of the eggs and of the young- just as does the male of the common species of Rhea. 546 THE DESCENT OF MAN. I will specify the few other cases known to me, in which the female is more conspicuously colored than the male, although nothing is known about the manner of incuba- tion. With the carrion-hawk of the Falkland Islands (Milvago leucurus] I was much surprised to find by dissec- tion that the individuals, which had all their tints strongly pronounced, with the cere and legs orange-colored, were the adult females; while those with duller plumage and gray legs were the males or the young. In an Australian tree- creeper (Climaderis erytlirops) the female differs from the male in "being adorned with beautiful, radiated, rufous markings on the throat, the male having this part quite plain." Lastly, in an Australian night-jar "the female always exceeds the male in size and in the brilliance of her tints; the males, on the other hand, have two white spots on the primaries more conspicuous than in the female."* We thus see that the cases in which female birds are more conspicuously colored than the males, with the young in their immature plumage resembling the adult males instead of the adult females, as in the previous class, are not numerous, though they are distributed in various orders. The amount of difference, also, between the sexes is incomparably less than that which frequently occurs in the last class; so that the cause of the difference, whatever it may have been, has here acted on the females either less energetically or less persistently than on the males in the last class. Mr. Wallace believes that the males have had * For the Milvago, see "Zoology of the Voyage of the 'Beagle': Birds," 1841, p. 16. For the Cliniacteris and night-jar (Eurostopo- dus), see Gould's "Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, pp. 602, 97. The New Zealand shieldrake (Tadorna variegata) offers a quite anomalous case; the head of the female is pure white, and her back is redder than that of the male; the head of tfhe male is of a rich dark bronzed color, and his back is clothed with finely penciled slate-colored feathers, so that altogether he may be considered as the more beautiful of the two. He is larger and more pugnacious than the female, and does not sit on the eggs. So that in all these respects this species comes under our first class of cases; but Mr. Sclater (" Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1866, p. 150) was much surprised to observe that the young of both sexes, when about three months old, resem- bled in their dark heads and necks the adult males, instead of the adult females; so that it would appear in this case that the females Lave been modified, while the males and the young have retained a former state of plumage. BIRDS. 547 their colors rendered less conspicuous for the sake of pro- tection during the period of incubation; but the difference between the sexes in hardly any of the foregoing cases appears sufficiently great for this view to be safely accepted. In some of the cases the brighter tints of the female are almost confined to the lower surface, and the males, if thus colored, would not have been exposed to danger while sitting on ttie eggs. It should also be borne in mind that the males are not only in a slight degree less conspicuously colored than the females, but are smaller and weaker. They have, moreover, not only acquired the maternal instinct of incubation, but are less pugnacious and vociferous than the females, and in one instance have simpler vonal organs. Thus, an almost complete transposi- tion of thn instincts, habits, disposition, color, size, and of some points of structure, has been effected between the two Now, if we might assume that the males in the present class have lost some of that ardor which is usual to their sex, so that they no longer search eagerly for the females; or, if we might assume that the females have become much more numerous than the males and in the case of one Indian Turnix the females are said to be " much more commonly met with than the males " * then it is not improbable that the females would have been led to court the males, instead of being courted by them. This indeed is the case to a certain extent with some birds, as we have seen with the peahen, wild turkey, and certain kinds of grouse. Taking as our guide the habits of most male birds, the greater size and strength, as well as the extraor- dinary pugnacity of the females of the Turnix and emu, must mean that they endeavor to drive away rival females in order to gain possession of the male; and on this view all the facts become clear ; for the males would probably be most charmed or excited by the females which were tho most attractive to them by their bright colors, other orna- ments, or_ vocal powers. Sexual selection would then do its 'work, steadily adding to the attractions of the females ; the males and the young being left not at all, or but little, modified. CLASS III. WJien the adult male resembles the adult * Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. Ui, p. 598. 548 THE DESCENT OF MAN. .female, the young of both sexes have a peculiar first plumage of their own. In this class the sexes when adult resemble each other and differ from the young. This occurs with many birds of many kinds. The male robin can hardly be distinguished from the female, but the young are widely different, with their mottled dusky-olive and brown plum- age. The male and female of the splendid scarlet ibis are alike, while the young are brown; and the scarlet color, though common to both sexes, is apparently a sexual character, for it is not well developed in either sex under confinement ; and a loss of color often occurs with brill- iant males when they are confined. With many species of herons the young differ greatly from the adults; and the summer plumage of the latter, though common to both sexes, clearly has a nuptial character. Young swans are slate-colored, while the mature birds are pure white; but it would be superfluous to give additional instances. These differences between the young and the old apparently depend, as in the last two classes, on the young having retained a former or ancient state of plumage, while the old of both sexes have acquired a new one. When the adults are bright colored, we may conclude from the remarks just made in relation to the scarlet ibis and to many herons, and from the analogy of the species in the first class, that such colors have been acquired through sexual selection by the nearly mature males ; but that, differently from what occurs in the first two classes, the transmission, though lim- ited to the same age, has not been limited to the same sex. Consequently, the sexes when mature resemble each other and differ from the young. CLASS IV. WJien the adult male resembles the adult female, the young of both sexes in their first plumage resem- ble the adults. In this class the young and the adults of both sexes, whether tmlliantly or obscurely colored, resem- ble each other. Such cases are, I think, more common than those in the last class. We have in England instances in the kingfisher, some woodpeckers, the jay, magpie, crow, and many small dull-colored birds, such as the hedge-warbler or kitty-wren. - But the similarity in plum- age between the young and the old is never complete, and graduates away into dissimilarity. Thus the young of some members of the kingfisher family are not only less BIRDS. 549 vividly colored than the adults, but many of the feathers on the lower surface are edged with brown* a vestige probably of a former state of the plumage. Frequently in the same group of birds, even within the same genus for instance, in the Australian genus of paroquets (Platycercus), the young of some species closely resemble, while the young of other species differ consider- ably from, their parents of both sexes, which are alike, f Both sexes and the young of the common -jay are closely similar; but in the Canada jay (Perisoreus canadensis) the young differ so much from their parents that they were formerly described as distinct species. J I may remark before proceeding that, under the present and next two classes of cases, the facts are so complex and the conclusions so doubtful that any one who feels no especial interest in the subject had better pass them over. The brilliant or conspicuous colors which characterize many birds in the present class can rarely or never be of service to them as & protection; so that they have probably been gained by the males through sexual selection and then transferred to the females and the young. It is, however, possible that the males may have selected the more attractive females; and if these transmitted their characters to their offspring of both sexes the same results would follow as from the selection of the more attractive males by the females. But there is evidence that this contingency has rarely, if ever, occurred in any of those groups of birds in which the sexes are generally alike; for, if even a few of the successive variations had failed to be transmitted to both sexes, the females would have slightly exceeded the males in beauty. Exactly the reverse occurs under nature; for, in almost every large group in which the sexes generally resemble each other, the males of some few species are in a slight degree more brightly colored than the females. It is again possible that the ; females may have selected the more beautiful males, these males having reciprocally selected the more beautiful females; but it is ** doubtful whether this double process of selection would be likely to occur, owing to the greater eagerness of one sex than the other, and whether it would be more efficient than selection on one side alone. It is, therefore, the most probable view that sexual selection has acted, in the present class, as far as ornamental characters are con- cerned, in accordance with the general rule throughout the animal kingdom, that is, on the males; and that these have transmitted their *Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. i, pp. 222, 228. Gould's "Hand- book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, pp. 124, 130. f Gould, ibid, vol. ii, pp. 37, 46, 56. J Audubon, " Ornith. Biography," vol. ii, p. 55. 550 THE DESCENT OF MAN. gradually acquired colors, either equally or almost equally, to thei* offspring of both sexes. Another point is more doubtful, namely, whether the successive variations first appeared in the males after they had become nearly mature or while quite young. In either case sexual selection must have acted on the male when he had to compete with rivals for the possession of the female; and in both cases the characters thus acquired have been transmitted to both sexes and all ages But these characters, if acquired by the males when adult, may have been transmitted at first to the adults alone, and at some subsequent period transferred to the young. For it is known that when the law of inheritance at corresponding ages fails the offspring often inherit characters at an earlier age th'an that at which they first appeared in their parents.* Cases apparently of this kind have been observed with birds in a state of nature. For instance, Mr. Blyth has seen specimens of Lanius rufus and of Colymbus glacialis which had assumed while young, in a quite anomalous manner, the adult plumage of their parents, f Again, the young of the common swan (Cygnus olor) do not cast off their dark, feathers and become white until eighteen months or two years old; but Dr. F. Forel has described the case of three vigorous young birds, out of a brood of four, which were born pure white. These young birds were not albinos, as shown by the color of their beaks and legs, which nearly resembled the same parts in the adults.:): It may be worth while to illustrate the above three modes by which, in the present class, the two sexes and the young may have come to resemble each other, by the curious case of the genus Passer.g In the house-sparrow (P. domesticus) the male differs much from the female and from the young. The young and the females are alike, and resemble to a large extent both sexes and the young of the sparrow of Palestine (P. bracJiydactyliis), as well as of some allied species. We may therefore assume that the female and young of the house-sparrow approximately show us the plumage of the progenitor of the genus. Now with the tree-sparrow (P. mon- ianus) both sexes and the young closely resemble the male of the house-sparrow; so that they have all been modified in the same manner, and all depart from the typical coloring of their early pro- genitors. This may have been effected by a male ancestor of the tree- sparrow having varied, firstly, when nearly mature; or, secondly, while quite young, and by having in either case transmitted his modified plumage to the females and the young; or, thirdly, he may have varied when adult and transmitted his plumage to both adult exes, and, owing to the failure of the law of inheritance at corre- sponding ages, at some subsequent period to his young. It is impossible to decide which of these three modes has generally " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. H, p. 79. t Charleflworth's " Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. 1, 1837, pp. 305, 806. J" Bulletin de la Soc. Vaudolse des Sc. Nat.," vol. x, 1869, p. 132. The Toun* of the Polish swan, Cygnus wimvtabilis of Yarrell, are always white; but tola species, as Mr. Sclater informs me, is believed to be nothing more than a rariety of the domestic swan (C'ygnvs olor). 1 1 am Indebted to Mr. Blyth for information in regard to this genus. The sparrow of Palestine belongs to the sub-genus Petronla. BIRDS. 551 prevailed throughout the present class of cases. That the males varied while young and transmitted their variations to their offspring of both sexes is the most probable. I may here add that I have, with little success, endeavored, by consulting various works, to decide how far the period of variation in birds has generally deter- mined the transmission of characters to one sex or to both. The two rules, often referred to (namely, that variations occurring late in life are transmitted to one and the same sex, while those which occur early in life are transmitted to both sexes), apparently hold good in the first,* second, and fourth classes of cases; but they fail in the third, often in the fifth, f and in the sixth small class. They apply, however, as far as I can judge, to a considerable majority of the species; and we must not forget the striking generalization by Dr. W. Marshall with respect to the protuberances on the heads of birds. Whether or not the two rules generally hold good, we may conclude from the facts given in the eighth chapter that the period of variation is one important element in determining the form of transmission. With birds it is difficult to decide by what standard we ought to judge of the earliness or lateness of the period of variation, whether by the age in reference to the duration of life, or to the power of reproduction, or to the number of moults through which the species passes. The moulting of birds, even within the same family, some times differs much without any assignable cause. Some birds moult so early that nearly all the body-feathers are cast off before the first wing- feathers are fully grown; and we cannot believe that this was the primordial state of things. When the period of moulting has been accelerated the age at which the colors of the adult plumage are Srst developed will falsely appear to us to be earlier than it really is. This may be illustrated by the practice followed by some bird-fanciers, who pull out a few feathers from the breast of nestling bullfinches, and from the head or neck of young Gold pheasants, in order to ascertain their sex; for in the males, these feathers are immediately replaced by colored ones4 The actual duration of life is known in but few birds, so that we can hardly judge by this standard. And with reference to the period at which the power of reproduction is gained, it is a remarkable fact that various birds occasionally breed while retaining their immature plumage. * For instance, the males of Tanagra (estiva and Frinqitta cyanea require three years, the male of Fnngilla ciris four years, to complete their beautful plumage, (See Audubon, " Ornith. Biography," vol. i, pp. 233, 280, 378). The Harlequin duck takes three years (ibid, vol. iii, p. 614). The male of the Gold pheasant, as I heav from Mr. Jenner Weir, can be distinguished from the female when about three nwnths old, but he does not acquire his full splendor until the end of September in the following year. t Thus the Ibis tantalus and Grus americamis take four years, the Flamingo several years, and the Ardea ludovicana two years, before they acquire their perfect plumage. See Audubon, ibid, vol. 5, p. 221; vol. iii, pp. 133, 139. 211. $Mr. Blyth, In Charlesworth's "Mag. of Nat. Hist.," vol. 1, 1837, p. 300. Mr. Bartlett has informed me in regard to Gold pheasants. I have noticed the following cases in Audubon's " Ornith. Biography:" The redstart of America (ifascapica rttticiUd), vol. i, p. 203. The Ibis tantahts takes four years to come to full maturity, but sometimes breeds in the second year (vol. iii, p. 133). The Grus amerlcanus takes the same time, but breeds be- fore acquiring its full plumage (vol. iii, p. 211). The adults of Arclea caarulw 552 THE DESCENT OF MAN. The fact of birds breeding in their immature plumage seems opposed to the belief that sexual selection has played as important a part, as I believe it has, in giving ornamental colors, plumes, etc., to the males, and, by means of equal transmission, to the females of many species. The objection would be a valid one, if the younger and less ornamented males were as successful in winning females and propagating their kind, as the older and more beautiful males. But we have no reason to suppose that this is the case. Audubon speaks of the breeding of the immature males of Jbis tantalus as a rare event, as does Mr. Swinhoe, in regard to the immature males of Oriolus.* If the young of any species in their immature plumage were more successful in winning partners than the adults, the adult plumage would probably soon be lost, as the males would prevail which retained their immature dress for the longest period, and thus the character of the species would ultimately be modified. -f If, on the other hand, the young never succeeded in obtaining a female, the habit of early reproduction would perhaps be sooner or later eliminated, from being superfluous and entailing waste of power. The plumage of certain birds goes on increasing in beauty during many years after they are fully mature; this is the case with the train of the peacock, with some of the birds of paradise, and with the crests and plumes of certain herons, for instance, the Ardea ludovicana.\ But it is doubtful whether the continued development of such feathers is the result of the selection of successive beneficial variations (though this is the most probable view with birds of para- dise) or merely of continuous growth. Most fishes continue increas- ing in size, as long as they are in good health and have plenty of food; and a somewhat similar law may prevail with the plumes of birds. CLASS V. When the adults of both sexes have a distinct winter and summer plumage, whether or not the male differs from the female, the young resemble the adults of both sexes in their winter dress, or much more rarely in their nummer dress, or they resemble are blue and the young 1 white; and white, mottled, and mature blue birds may all be seen breeding together (vol. iv, p. 58); but Mr. Blyth Informs me that certain herons apparently are dimorphic, for white and colored individ- uals of the same age may be observed. The Harlequin duck (Ana* hiotrioidca, Linn.) takes three years to acquire its full plumage, though many birds breed in the second year (vol. iii, p. 614). The white-headed eagle (Falco leucocephalus), vol. iii, p. 210, is likewise known to breed in its immature state. Some species of Oriolus (according to Mr. Blyth and Air. Swinhoe, in " Ibis," July, 1863, p. 88) likewise breed before they attain their full plumage. * See the last foot-note. t Other animals, belonging to quite distinct classes, are either habitually or occasionally capable of breeding before they have fully acquired their adult characters. This is the case with the young males of the salmon. Several amphibians have been known to breed while retaining their larval structure. Fritz Muller has shown (" Facts and Arguments for Darwin," Eng. trans., 1869, p. 79) that the males of .several amphipod crustaceans become sexually mature while young; and I infer that this is a case of premature breeding, because they have not as yet acquired their fully developed claspers. All such facts are highly interesting, as bearing on one means by which species may undergo great modifications or character. 1 Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 507, on the peacock. Dr. Marshall thinks that the older and more brilliant niMles of birels of paradise have an advantage over the younger males; see " Archives Neerlandalses," torn, vi, 1871. On Ardea, Audubon. ibid, vol. iii, p. 139. BIEDS. 553 the females alone. Or the young may have an intermediate character ; or, again, they may differ greatly from the adults in both their seasonal plumages. The cases in this class are singularly complex; nor is this surprising, as they depend on inheritance, limited in a greater or less degree in three different ways, namely, by sex, age, and the season of the year. In some cases the individuals of the same species pass through at least five distinct states of plumage. With the species in which the male differs from the female during the summer season alone, or, which is rarer, during both seasons,* the young generally resemble the females as with the so-called goldfinch of North America, and apparently with the splendid Maluri of Australia.! With those species, the eexes of which are alike during both the summer and winter, the young may resemble the adults, firstly, in their winter dress ; sec- ondly, and this is of much rarer occurrence, in their summer dress ; thirdly, they may be intermediate between these two states ; and, fourthly, they may differ greatly from the adults at all seasons. We have an instance of the first of these four cases in one of the egrets of India (Buphus coi'omandus), in which the young and the adults of both sexes are white during the winter, the adults becoming golden- buff during the summer. With the gaper (Anastomus oscitans) of India we have a similar case, but the colors are reversed ; for the young and the adults of both sexes are gray and black during the winter, the adults becoming 1 white during the summer. $ As an instance of the second case, the young of the razor-bill (Alca torda, Linn.), in an early state of plumage, are colored like the adults dur- ing the summer; and the young of the white-crowned sparrow of North America (Fringilla leucophrys), as soon as fledged, have elegant white stripes on their heads, which are lost by the young and the old during the winter. With respect to the third case, namely, that of the young having an intermediate character between the summer and winter adult plumages, Yarrell || insists that this occurs with many waders. Lastly, in regard to the young differing greatly from both sexes in tlieir adult summer and winter plumages, this occurs with some hei 3ns and egrets of North America and India the young alone being white. I will make only a few remarks on these complicated cases. When the young resemble the females in their summer dress, or the adults of both sexes in their winter dress, the cases differ from those given under Classes I and III only in the characters originally acquired * For illustrative cases see vol. iv, of Macgillivray's " Hist. Brit. Birds ;" on Tringa, etc., pp. 229, 271; on the Machetes, p. 172; on the Charadrius hiati- cula, p. 118; on the Charadrius pluvialis, p. 94. t For the goldfinch of North America, Fringilla tristis, Linn., see Audubon, "Ornith. Biography," vol. i, p. 172. For the Maluri, Gould's " Hand-book to the Birds of Australia," vol. i, p. 318. $ 1 am indebted to Mr. Blyth for information as to the Buphus; see also Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. iii, p. 749. On the Anastomus, see Blyth, ia " Ibis," 1867. p. 173. On the Alca, see Macgillivray, " Hist. Brit. Birds," vol. v, p, 347. On the Fringilla leitcophryc, Audubon, Ibid, vol. ii, p. 89. I shall have hereafter to refer to the young of certain herons and egrets being white. II History of British Birds," vol. i, 1839, p. 159. 554 THE DESCENT OF MAN. by the males during the breeding-season having been limited in then transmission to the corresponding season. When the adults have a distinct summer and winter plumage, ant the young differ from both, the case is more difficult to understand. We may admit as probable that the young have retained an ancient state of plumage; we cau account by sexual selection for the summer or nuptial plumage of the adults, but how are we to account for their distinct winter plumage t If we could admit that this plumage serves in all cases as a protec- tion, its acquirement would be a simple affair; but there seems no good reason for this admission. It may be suggested that the widely different conditions of life during the winter and summer have acted in a direct manner on the plumage ; this may have had some effect, but I have not much confidence in so great a difference as we sometimes see between the two plumages having been thus caused. A more probable explanation is, that an ancient style of plumage, partially modified through the transference of some char- acters from the summer plumage, has been retained by the adults during the winter. Finally, all the cases in our present class appa- rently depend on characters acquired by the adult males having been variously limited in their transmission according to age, season, and sex; but it would not be worth while to attempt to follow out these complex relations. CLASS VI. The young in their first plumage differ from each other according to sex; the young males resembling more or less closely the adult males, and the young females more or less closely the adult females. The cases in the present class, though occurring in various groups, are not numerous; yet it seems the most natural thing that the young should at first somewhat resemble the adults of the same sex, and gradually become more and more like them. The adult male blackcap (Sylvia atricapitta) has a black head, that of the female being reddish-brown; and I am informed by Mr. Blyth, that the young of both sexes can be distinguished by this character even as nestlings. In the family of thrushes an unusual number of simi- lar cases have been noticed ; thus, the male blackbird (2\irdus merula) can be distinguished in the nest from the female. The two sexes of the mocking- bird (Turdus polyglottus, Linn.) differ very little from each other, yet the males can easily be distinguished at a very early age from the females by showing more pure white.* The males of a forest-thrush and of a rock-thrush (Orocctes erythrogastra and Petrocincla cyanea) have much of their plumage of a fine blue, while the females are brown; and the nestling males of both species have their main wing and tail feathers edged with blue, while those of the female are edged with brown. f In the young blackbird the wing-feathers assume their mature character and become black after the others; on the other hand, in the two species just named the wing-feathers become blue before the others. The most probable view with reference to the cases in the present class is that the males, * Audubon " Ornith. Biography," vol. i, p. 113. tMr. C. A. Wright, in "Ibis," vol. vi, 1864, p. 65. Jerdon, "Birds of India," vol. 1, p. 515. See also on the blackbird, Blyth, in Charlesworth'a " Mag. of Nat. History," vol. i. 1837 o. 113. BIRDS. 555 differently from what occurs in Class I, have transmitted their colors to their male offspring at an earlier age than that at which they were first acquired; for, if the males had varied while quite young, their characters would probably have been transmitted to both sexes.* In A'ithurus polytmus, a humming-bird, the male is splendidly colored black and green, and two of the tail-feathers are immensely lengthened; the female has an ordinary tail and inconspicuous 'colors; now the young males, instead of resembling the adult female, in accordance with the common rule, begin from the first to assume the colors proper to their sex, and their tail-feathers soon become elongated. I owe this information to Mr. Gould, who has given me the following more striking and as yet unpublished case. Two humming-birds belonging to the genus Eustephanus, both beautifully colored, inhabit the small island of Juan Fernandez, and have always been ranked as specifically distinct. But it has lately been ascertained that the one which is of a rich chestnut-brown color with a golden-red head, is the male, while the other, which is elegantly variegated with green and white, with a metallic green head, is the female. Now the young from the first somewhat resem- ble the adults of the corresponding sex, the resemblance gradually becoming more and more complete. In considering this last case, if as before we take the plumage of the young as our guide, it would appear that both sexes have been rendered beautiful independently; and not that one sex has partially transferred its beauty to the other. The male apparently has acquired his bright colors through sexual selection in the same manner as, for instance, the peacock or pheasant in our first class of cases; and the female in the same manner as the female Rhynchsea or Turnix in our second class of cases. But there is much difficulty in understanding how this could have been effected at the same time with the two sexes of the same species. Mr. Salvin states, as we have seen in the eighth chapter, that with certain humming-birds the males greatly exceed the females in number, while with other species inhabiting the same country the females greatly exceed the males. If, then, we might assume that during some former length- ened period the males of the Juan Fernandez species had greatly exceeded the females in number, but that during another lengthened period the females had far exceeded the males, we could understand how the males at one time, and the females at another, might have been rendered beautiful by the selection of the brighter-colored individuals of either sex; both sexes transmitting their characters to their young at a rather earlier age than usual. Whether this is the true explanation I will not pretend to say; but the case is too remark- able to be passed over without notice. * The following additional cases may be mentioned: the young males of * a (Audubon, ngs of a blue Tanagra ttibra can be distinguished from the young females (Audubon " Ornith. Biography," vol. iv, p. 892), and so it is within the nestlings of a blut nuthatch, Dendrophila frontalis, of India (Jerdon, " Birds of India," vol. i, p. 889). Mr. Blyth also informs me that the sexes of the stonechat, Saxicola rubi- cola, are distinguishable at a very early age. Mr. Salvin gives (" Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1870, p. 206), the case of a humming-bird, like the following one of Eustephanus. 556 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. We have now seen in all six classes that an intimate rela- tion exists between the plumage of the young and the adults, either of one sex or both. These relations ars fairly well explained on the principle that one sex thie, being in the great majority of cases the male first acquired through variation and sexual selection bright colors or other ornaments and transmitted them in various ways in accordance with the recognized laws of inheritance. Why variations have occurred at different periods of life, even sometimes with species of the same group, we do not know, but with respect to the form of transmission one important determining cause seems to be the age at which the varia- tions first appear. From the principle of inheritance at corresponding ages and from any variations in color which occurred in the males at an early age not being then selected on the con- trary being often eliminated as dangerous while similar variations occurring at or near the period of reproduction have been preserved, it follows that the plumage of the young will often have been left unmodified, or but little modified. We thus get some insight into the coloring of the progenitors of our existing species. In a vast number of species in five out of our six classes of cases the adults of one sex or of both are bright colored, at least during the breeding-season, while the young are invariably less brightly colored than the adults, or are quite dull colored; for no instance is known, as far as I can discover, of the young of dull-colored species displaying bright colors, or of the young of bright-colored species being more brilliant than their parents. In the fourth class, however, in which the young and the old resemble each other, there are many species (though by no means all), of which the young are bright colored, and, as these form old groups, we may infer that their early progenitors were likewise bright. With this exception, if we look to the birds of the world, it appears that their beauty has been much increased since that period, of which their immature plumage gives us a partial record. On the Color of the Plumage in Relation to Protection. It will have been seen that I cannot follow Mr. Wallace in the belief that dull colors, when confined to the females, have been in most cases specially gained for the sake of BIRDS. 557 protection. There can, however, be no doubt, as formerly remarked, that both sexes of many birds have had their colors modified so as to escape the notice of their enemies; or in some instances, so as to approach their prey unobserved, just as owls have had their plumage rendered soft, that their flight may not be overheard. Mr. Wallace remarks * that " it is only in the tropics, among forests which never lose their foliage, that we find whole groups of birds whose chief color is green." It will be admitted by every one who has ever tried how difficult it is to distinguish parrots in a leaf -covered tree. Nevertheless^, we must remember that many parrots are ornamented with crimson, blue and orange tints, which can hardly be protective. Woodpeckers are eminently arboreal, but besides green species there are many black and black-and-white kinds all the species being apparently exposed to nearly the same dangers. It is therefore probable that with tree-haunting birds strongly renounced colors have been acquired through sexual selec- ou, but that a green tint has been acquired oftener than any other from the additional advantage of protection. In regard to birds which live on the ground, every one admits that they are colored so as to imitate the surround- ing surface. How difficult it is to see a partridge, snipe, woodcock, certain plovers, larks and night-jars when crouched on ground. Animals inhabiting deserts offer the most striking cases, for the bare surface affords no conceal- ment, and nearly all the smaller quadrupeds, reptiles and birds depend for safety on their colors. Mr. Tristram has remarked in regard to the inhabitants of the Sahara, that all are protected by their " isabelline or sand color."f Calling to my recollection the desert-birds of South America, as well as most of the ground-birds of Great Britain, it appeared to me that both sexes in such cases are generally colored nearly alike. Accordingly, I applied to Mr. Tristram with respect to the birds of the Sahara, and he has kindly given me the following information: There are twenty-six species belonging to fifteen genera, - which" manifestly have their plumage colored in a protect- * " Westminster Review," July, 1867, p. 5. f " Ibis," 1859, vol. i, p. 429, et seg. Dr. Rohlfs, However, re- marks to me in a letter that, according to his experience of th* Sahara, this statement is too strong. 558 THE DESCENT OF MAN. ive manner; and this coloring is all the more striking, aa with most of these birds it differs from that of their con- geners. Both sexes of thirteen out of the twenty-six species are colored in the same manner; but these belong to genera in which this rule commonly prevails, so that tfhey tell us nothing about the protective colors being the same in both sexes of desert-birds. Of the other thirteen species tbree belong to genera in which the sexes usually differ from each other, yet here they have the sexes alike. In the remaining ten species the male differs from the female; but the difference is confined chiefly to the under surface of the plumage, which is concealed when the bird crouches on the ground; the head and back being of the same sand-colored hue in the two sexes. So that in these ten species the upper surfaces of both sexes have been acted on and rendered alike through natural selection for the sake of protection; while the lower surfaces of the males alone have been diversified through sexual selection for the sake of ornament. Here, as both sexes are equally well protected, we clearly see that the females have not been prevented by natural selection from inheriting the colors of their male parents ; so that we must look to the law of sexually limited transmission. In all parts of the world both sexes of many soft-billed birds, especially those which frequent reeds or hedges, are obscurely -colored. No doubt if their colors had been brilliant, they would have been much more conspicuous to their enemies; but whether their dull tints have been specially gained for the sake of protection seems, as far as I can judge, rather doubtful. It is still more doubtful whether such dull tints can have been gained for the sake of ornament. We must, however, bear in mind that male birds, though dull-colored, often differ much from their females (as with the common sparrow), and this leads to the belief that such colors have been gained through sexual selection from being attractive. Many of the soft-billed birds are songsters; and a discussion in a former chapter should not be forgotten, in which it was shown that tti best songsters are rarely ornamented with bright tints. It would appear that female birds, as a general rule, have selected their mates either for their sweet voices or gay colors, but not for both charms combined. Some species which are manifestly colored for the sake of protection, BIRDS. 559 such as the jack-snipe, woodcock and night- jar, are like- wise marked and shaded, according to our standard of taste, with extreme elegance. In such cases we may con- clude that both natural and sexual selection have acted conjointly for protection and ornament. Whether any bird exists which does not possess some special attraction by which to charm the opposite sex may be doubted. When both sexes are so obscurely colored that it would be rash to assume the agency of sexual selection, and when no direct evidence can be advanced showing that such colors serve as a protection, it is best to own complete ignorance of the cause, or, which comes to nearly the same thing, to attribute the result to the direct action of the conditions of life. Both sexes of many birds are conspicuously, though not brilliantly, colored, such as the numerous black, white, or piebald species; and these colors are probably the result of sexual selection. With the common blackbird, capercailzie, blackcock, black scoter- duck (Oidemia), and even with one of the birds of paradise (Lophorina atra) the males alone are black, while the females are brown or mottled; and there can hardly be a doubt that blackness in these cases has been a sexually selected character. Therefore, it is in some degree probable that the complete or partial blackness of both sexes in such birds as crows, certain cockatoos, storks and swans, and many marine birds, is likewise the result of sexual selection, accompanied by equal transmis- sion to both sexes; for blackness can hardly serve in any case as a protection. With several birds, in which the male alone is black, and in others in which both sexes are black, the beak or skin about the head is brightly colored, and the contrast thus afforded adds much to their beauty; we see this in the bright yellow beak of the male blackbird, in the crimson skin over the eyes -of the blackcock and caper- cailzie, in the brightly and variously colored beak of the scoter-drake (Oidemia), in the red beak of the chough (Corvus graculus, Linn.), of the black swan and the black stork. ' This leads me to remark that it is not incredible that toucans may owe the enormous size of their beaks to sexual selection, for the sake of displaying the diversified and vivid stripes of color with which these organs are ornamented.* The naked skin, also, at the base of the * No satisfactory explanation has ever been offered of the immense 560 THE DESCENT OF MAN. beak and round the eyes is likewise often brilliantly colored; and Mr. Gould, in speaking of one species,* says that the colors of the beak "are doubtless in the finest and most brilliant state during the time of pairing." There is no greater improbability that toucans should be encumbered with immense beaks, though rendered as light as possible by their cancellated structure, for the display of fine colors (an object falsely appearing to us unimportant), than that the male Argus pheasant and some other birds should be encumbered with plumes so long as to impede their flight. In the same manner, as the males alone of various species are black, the females being dull-colored; so in a few causes the males alone are either wholly or partially white, as with the several bell-birds of South America (Ohasmorhyuchus), the Antarctic goose (Bernicla antarctica), the silver pheas- ant, etc., while the females are brown or obscurely mottled. Therefore, on the same principle as before, it is probable that both sexes of many birds, such as white cockatoos, several egrets with their beautiful plumes, certain ibises, gulls, terns, etc., have acquired their more or less com- pletely white plumage through sexual selection. In some of these cases the plumage becomes white only at maturity. This is the case with certain gannets, tropic-birds, etc., and with the snow-goose (Anser hypcrloreus}. As the latter breeds on the "barren grounds," when not covered with snow, and as it migrates southward during the winter there is no reason to suppose that its snow-white adult plumage serves as a protection. In the Anastomus oscitans we have still better evidence that the white plumage is a nuptial character, for it is developed only during the size, and still less of the bright colors, of the toucan's beak. Mr. Bates (" The Naturalist on the Amazons," vol. ii, 1868, p. 341) states that they use their beaks for reaching fruit at the extreme tips of the branches; and likewise, as stated by other authors, for extracting eggs and young birds from the nests of other birds. But, as Mr. Bates admits, the beak "can scarcely be considered a very perfectly formed instrument for the end to which it is applied." The great bulk of the beak, ascshown by its breadth, depth, as well as length, is not intelligible on the view, that it serves merely as an organ of prehension. Mr. Belt believes (" The Naturalist in Nicaragua," p. 197) that the principal use of the beak is as a defense against enemies, especially to the female while nesting in a hole in a tree. * Rhainphastos carinatus, Gould's " Monograph of Rhamphastidae." BIRDS. 561 summer; the young in their immature state and the adulte in their winter dress being gray and black. With many kinds of gulls (Larus) the head and neck become pure white during the summer, being gray or mottled during the winter and in the young state. On the other hand, with the smaller gulls, or sea-mews (Gavia) and with some terns (Sterna) exactly the reverse occurs; for the heads of the young birds during the first year, and of the adults during the winter, are either pure white or much paler colored than during the breeding-season. These latter cases offer another instance of the capricious manner in which sexual selection appears often to have acted.* That aquatic birds have acquired a white plumage so much oftener than terrestrial birds probably depends on their large size and strong powers of flight, so that they can easily defend themselves or escape from birds of prey, to which, moreover, they are not much exposed. Conse- quently sexual selection has not here been interfered with or guided for the sake of protection. No doubt with birds which roam over the open ocean, the males and females could find each other much more easily when made con- spicuous either by being perfectly white or intensely black; so that these colors may possibly serve the same end as the call-notes of many land-birds, f A white or black bird when it discovers and flies down to a carcass floating on the sea or cast upon the beach, will be seen from a great dis- tance, and will guide other birds of the same and other species to the prey; but as this would be a disadvantage to the first finders, the individuals which were the whitest or blackest would not thus procure more food than the less strongly colored individuals. Hence conspicuous colors cannot have been gradually acquired for this purpose ( through natural selection. As sexual selection depends on so fluctuating an element *On Larus, Gavia and Sterna, see Macgiilivray, "Hist. Brit. Birds," vol. v, pp. 515, 584, 626. On the Anser hyperboreus, Audu- bon, " Ornitk. Biography," vol. iv, p, 562. On the Anastomus, Mr. Blyth, in ' Ibis," 1867, p. 173. f It may be noticed that with vultures, which roam far and wide high in the air, like marine birds over the ocean, three or four species are almost wholly or largely white, and that many others are black. So that here again conspicuous colors may possibly aid the sexes in finding each other during the breeding season. 562 THE DESCENT OF MAN. as taste, we can understand how it is that, within the same group of birds having nearly the same habits, there should exist white or nearly white, as well as black or nearly black, species for instance, both white and black cockatoos, storks, ibises, swans, terns and petrels. Piebald birds like- wise sometimes occur in the same groups together with black and white species; for instance, the black-necked ewan, certain terns and the common magpie. That a strong contrast in color is agreeable to birds we may conclude by looking through any large collection, for the sexes often differ from each other in the male having the pale parts of a purer white, and the variously colored dark parts of still darker tints than the female. It would even appear that mere novelty, or slight changes for the sake of change, have sometimes acted on female birds as a charm, like changes of fashion with us. Thus the males of some parrots can hardly be said to be more beautiful than the females, at least according to our taste, but they differ in such points, as in having a rose- colored collar instead of "a bright, emeraldine, narrow green collar;" or in the male having a black collar instead of "a yellow demi-collar in front," with a pale roseate instead of a plum-blue head.* As so many male birds have elongated tail-feathers or elongated crests for their chief ornament, the shortened tail, formerly described in the male of a humming-bird, and the shortened crest of the male goosander, seem like one of the many changes of fashion which we admire in our own dresses. Some members of the heron family offer a still more curious case of novelty in coloring, having, as it appears, been appreciated for the sake of novelty. The young of the Ardea asha are white, the adults being dark slate- colored; and not only the young, but the adults in their winter plumage, of the allied Buphus coromandus are white, this color changing into a rich golden-buff during the breeding-season. It is incredible that the young of these two species, as well as of some other members of the same family, f should for any special purpose have been *8ee Jerdon on the genus Palseornis, "Birds of India," vol. i, pp. 258-260. f-Tke young of Ardea rufescens and A. cazrulea of the United States are likewise white, the adults being colored in accordance BIRDS. 563 rendered pure white and thus made conspicuous to their enemies; or that the adults of one of these two species should have been specially rendered white during the winter in a country which is never covered with snow. On the other hand, we have good reason to believe that white- ness has been gained by many birds as a sexual ornament. We may therefore conclude that some early progenitor of the Ardea asha and the Buphus acquired a white plumage for nuptial purposes, and transmitted this color to their young; so that the young and the old became white like certain existing egrets; and that the whiteness was after- ward retained by the young, while it was exchanged by the adults for more strongly pronounced tints. But if we could look still further back to the still earlier progenitors of these two species we should probably see the adults dark- colored. I infer that this would be the case from the analogy of many other birds which are dark while young and when adult are white; and more especially from the case of the Ardea gularis, the colors of which are the reverse of those of A. asha, for the young are dark-colored, and the adults white, the young having retained a forme* state of plumage. It appears therefore that during a lonj 1 line of descent, the adult progenitors of the Ardea asha> the Buphus, and of some allies, have undergone the follow- ing changes of color: fiistly, a dark shade; secondly, pure white, and thirdly, owing to another change of fashion (if I may so express myself), their present slaty, reddish, or golden-buff tints. These successive changes are intelligi- ble only on the principle of novelty having been admired by birds for its own sake. Several writers have objected to the whole theory of sexual selection by assuming that with animals and savages the taste of the female for certain colors or other ornaments would not remain constant for many generations; that first one color and then another would be admired, and conse- quently that no permanent effect could be produced. We may admit that taste is fluctuating, but it is not quite arbi- trary. It depends much on habit, as we see in mankind ; and we may infer that this would hold good with birds and with their specific names. Audubon (" Ornith. Biography," vol. iii, p. 416; vol. iv, p. 58) seems rather pleased at the thought that thia remarkable change of plumage will greatly "disconcert the system- atists." 564 THE DESCENT OF MAN. other animals. Even in our own dress the general charactel lasts long, and the changes are to a certain extent gradu- ated. Abundant evidence will be given in two places in a future chapter that savages of many races have admired for many generations the same cicatrices on the skin, the same hideously perforated lips, nostrils, or ears, distorted heads, etc.; and these deformities present some analogy to the natural ornaments of various animals. Nevertheless, with savages such fashions do not endure forever, as we may infer from the differences in this respect between allied tribes on the same continent. So, again, the raisers of fancy animals certainly have admired for many generations and still admire the same breeds; the}' earnestly desire slight changes, which are considered as improvements, but any great or sudden change is looked at as the greatest blemish. With birds in a state of nature we have no reason to suppose that they would admire an entirely new style of coloration, even if great and sudden variations often occurred, which is far from being the case. We know that dove-cote pigeons do not willingly associate with the variously colored fancy breeds; that albino birds do not commonly get partners in marriage; and that the black ravens of the Feroe Islands chase away their piebald brethren. But this dislike of a sudden change would not preclude their appreciating slight changes any more than it does in the case of man. Hence, with respect to taste, which depends on many elements, but partly on habit and partly on a love of novelty, there seems no improba- bility in animals admiring for a very long period the same general style of ornamentation or other attractions, and yet appreciating slight changes in colors, form, or sound. Summary of the Four Chapters on Birds. Most male birds are highly pugnacious during the breeding-season, and some possess weapons adapted for fighting with their rivals. But the most pugnacious and the best armed males rarely or never depend for success solely on their power to drive away or kill their rivals, but have special means for charm- ing the female. With some it is the power of song, or of giving forth strange cries, or instrumental music, and the males in consequence differ from the females in their vocal organs, or in the structure of certain feathers. From the BIRDS. 565 curiously diversified means for producing various sounds we gain a high idea of the importance of this means of court- ship. Many birds endeavor to charm the females by love dances or antics performed on the ground or in the air, and sometimes at prepared places. But ornaments of many kinds, the most brilliant tints, combs and wattles, beautiful plumes, elongated feathers, top-knots, and so forth, are by far the commonest means. In some cases mere novelty appears to have acted as a charm. The ornaments of the males must be highly important to them, for they have been acquired in not a few cases at the cost of increased danger from enemies, and even at some loss of power in lighting with their rivals. The males of very many species do not assume their ornamental dress until they arrive at maturity, or they assume it only during the breeding-season, or the tints then become more vivid. Certain ornamental appendages become enlarged, turgid, and brightly colored during the act of courtship. The males display their charms with elaborate care and to the best effect; and this is done in the presence of the females. The courtship is sometimes a prolonged affair, and many males and females congregate at an appointed place. To suppose that the females do not appreciate the beauty of the males is to admit that their splendid decorations, all their pomp and display, are useless; and this is incredible. Birds have fine powers of discrimination, and in some few instances it can be shown that they have a taste for the beautiful. The females, moreover, are known occasionally to exhibit a marked preference or antipathy for certain individual males. If it be admitted that the females prefer, or are uncon- sciously excited by the more beautiful males, then the males would slowly but surely be rendered more and more attractive through sexual selection. That it is this sex which has been chiefly modified, we may infer from the fact that, in almost every genus where the sexes differ, the males differ much more from one another than do the females; this is well shown in certain closely allied repre- sentative species, in which the females can hardly be dis- tinguished, while the males are quite distinct. Birds in a state of nature offer individual differences which would amply suffice for the work of sexual selection; but we have eeen that they occasionally present more strongly marked 566 THE DESCENT OF MAN. variations which recur so frequently that they would imme- diately be fixed, if they served to allure the female. The laws of variation must determine the nature of the initial changes, and will have largely influenced the final result. The gradations, which may be observed between the males of allied species, indicate the nature of the steps through which they have passed. They explain also in the most interesting manner how certain characters have originated, such as the indented ocelli on the tail-feathers of the pea- cock, and the ball-and-socket ocelli on the wing- feathers of the Argus pheasant. It is evident that the brilliant colors, top-knots, fine plumes, etc., of many male birds cannot have been acquired as a protection; indeed, they sometimes lead to danger. That they are not due to the direct and definite action of the conditions of life, we may feel assured, because the females have been exposed to the same conditions, and yet often differ from the males to an extreme degree. Although it is probable that changed conditions acting during a lengthened period have in some cases produced a definite effect on both sexes, or some- times on one sex alone, the more important result will have been an increased tendency to var^ or to present more strongly marked individual differs -..as; and such differ- ences will have afforded an excellent groundwork for the action of sexual selection. The laws of inheritance, irrespectively of selection, appear to have determined whether the characters acquired by the males for the sake of ornament, for producing vari- ous sounds and for fighting together, have been transmitted to the males alone or to both sexes either permanently or periodically during certain seasons of the year. Why various characters should have been transmitted sometimes in one way and sometimes in another is not in most cases known; but the period of variability seems often to have been the determining cause. When the two sexes have inherited all characters in common they necessarily resem- ble each other; but as the successive variations may be differently transmitted every possible gradation may be found, even within the same genus, from the closest simi- larity to the widest dissimilarity between the sexes. AVith many closely allied species, following nearly the same habits of life, the males have come to differ from each other chiefly through the action of sexual selection; while BIRDS. 567 the females have come to differ chiefly from partaking more or less of the characters thus acquired by the males. The effects, moreover, of the definite action of the condi- tions of life will not have been masked in the females as in the males by the accumulation through sexual selection of strongly pronounced colors and other ornaments. The individuals of both sexes, however affected, will have been kept at each successive period nearly uniform by the free intercrossing of many individuals. With species in which the sexes differ in color it is possi- ble or probable that some of the successive variations often tended to be transmitted equally to both sexes; but that when this occurred the females were prevented from acquir- ing the bright colors of the males by the destruction which they suffered during incubation. There is no evidence that it is possible by natural selection to convert one form of transmission into another. But there would not be the least difficulty in rendering a female dull-colored, the male being still kept bright-colored, by the selection of suc- cessive variations which were from the first limited in their transmission to the same sex. Whether the females of many species have actually been thus modified must at present remain doubtful. When, through the law of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes, the females were rendered as conspicuously colored as the males, their instincts appear often to have been modified so that they were led to build domed or concealed nests. In one small and curious class of cases the characters and habits of the two sexes have been completely trans- posed, for the females are larger, stronger, more vociferous and brighter colored than the males. They have also be- come so quarrelsome that they often fight together for the possession of the males like the males of other pugnacious species for the possession of the females. If, as seems probable, such females habitually drive aways their rivals, and by the display of their bright colors or other charms endeavor to attract the males, we can understand how it is that they- have gradually been rendered by sexual selection and sexually limited transmission more beautiful than the males the latter being left unmodified or only slightly modified. Whenever the law of inheritance at corresponding ages 568 THE DESCENT OF NAN. prevails, but not that of sexually limited transmission, then if the parents vary late in life and we know that this con- stantly occurs with our poultry and occasionally with other birds the young will be left unaffected, while the adults of both sexes will be modified. If both these laws of inheritance prevail and either sex varies late in life, that sex alone will be modified, the other sex and the young being unaffected. When variations in brightness or in other conspicuous characters occur early in life, as no doubt often happens, they will not be acted on through sexual selection until the period of reproduction arrives; conse- quently if dangerous to the young they will be eliminated through natural selection. Thus we can understand how it is that variations arising late in life have so often been preserved for the ornamentation of the males; the females and the young being left almost unaffected, and therefore like each other. With species having a distinct summer and winter plumage, the males of which either resemble or differ from the females during both seasons or during the summer alone, the degrees and kinds of resemblance between the young and the old are exceedingly complex; and this complexity apparently depends on characters, first acquired by the males, being transmitted in various ways and degrees, as limited by age, sex and season. As the young of so many species have been but little modified in color and in other ornaments, we are enabled to form some judgment with respect to the plumage of their early progenitors; and we may infer'that the beauty of our existing species, if we look to the whole class, has been largely increased since that period, of which the immature plumage gives us an indirect record. Many birds, espe- cially those which live much on the ground, have undoubt- edly been obscurely colored for the sake of protection. In some instances the upper exposed surface of the plumage has been thus colored in both sexes, while the lower surface in the males alone has been variously ornamented through sexual selection. Finally, from the facts given in these four chapters, we may conclude that weapons for battle, organs for producing sound, ornaments of many kinds, bright and conspicuous colors, have generally been acquired by the males through variation and sexual selection and have been transmitted in various ways according to the BIRDS. 569 several laws of inheritance the females and the young being left comparatively but little modified.* * I am greatly indebted to the kindness of Mr. Sclater for having looked over these four chapters on birds, and the two following ones on mammals. In this way I have been saved from making mistakes about the names of the species, and from stating anything as a fact which is known to this distinguished naturalist to be erroneous. But of course he is not at all answerable for the accuracy of the statements quoted by me from various authorities. 570 THE DESCENT OF MAN. CHAPTER XVII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALS. The law of battle Special weapons, confined to the males Cause of absence of weapons in the female Weapons common to both sexes, yet primarily acquired by the male Other uses of such weapons Their high importance Greater size of the male Means of defense On the preference shown by either sex in the ' pairing of quadrupeds. WITH mammals the male appears to win the female much more through the law of battle than through the display of his charms. The most timid animals, not pro- vided with any special weapons for fighting, engage in des- perate conflicts during the season of love. Two male hares have been seen to fight together until one was killed; male moles often fight, and sometimes with fatal results ; male squirrels engage in frequent contests, <( and often wound each other severely;" as do male beavers, so that " hardly a skin is without scars."* I observed the same fact with the hides of the guanacoes in Patagonia; and on one occa- sion several were so absorbed in fighting that they fear- lessly rushed close by me, Livingstone speaks of the males of the many animals in Southern Africa as almost invari- ably showing the scars received in former contests. The law of battle prevails with aquatic as with terrestrial mammals. It is notorious how desperately male seals fight, both with their teeth and claws, during the breeding- season ; and their hides are likewise often covered with scars. Male sperm-whales are very jealous at this season; and in their battles :f they often lock their jaws together * See Waterton's account of two hares fighting, " Zoologist, " vol . i, 1843, p. 211. On moles, Bell, "Hist, of British Quadrupeds," 1st edit., p. 100. On squirrels, Audubon and Bachman, 'Viviparous Quadrupeds of North America," 1846, p. 269. On beavers, Mr. A. H. Green, in " Journal of Lin. Soc. Zoolog.," vol. x, 1869, p. 362. MAMMALS. 571 and turn on their sides and twist about; 1 * so that their lower jaws often become distorted.* All male animals which are furnished with special weap- ons for fighting are well known to engage in fierce battles. The courage and the desperate conflicts of stags have often described; their skeletons have been found in various fcs of the world, with the horns inextricably locked jther, showing how miserably the victor and vanquished perished, f No animal in the world is so dangerous as jm elephant in must. Lord Tankerville has given me a graphic description of the battles between the wild bulls in Chillingham Park, the descendants, degenerated in size but not in courage, of the gigantic Bos ^rimigenius. In 1861 several contended for mastery; and it was observed that two of the younger bulls attacked in concert the old leader of the herd, overthrew and disabled him, so that he was believed by the keepers to be lying mortally wounded in a neighboring wood. But a few days afterward one of the young bulls approached the wood alone; and then the "monarch of the chase," who had been lashing himself up for vengeance, came out, and, in a short time, killed his antagonist. He then quietly joined the herd, and long held undisputed sway. Admiral Sir B. J. Sulivan informs me that, when he lived in the Falkland Islands, he imported a young English stallion, which frequented the hills near Port William with eight mares. On these hills there were two wild stallions, each with a small troop of mares; " and it is certain that these stallions would never have approached each other without fighting. Both had tried singly to fight the English horse and drive away his mares, but had failed. One day they came in together and attacked him. This was seen by the capitan who had charge of the horses, and who, on riding to the spot, found one of the two stallions * On the battles of seals, see Capt. C. Abbott, in " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1868, p. 191; also Mr. R. Brown, ibid, 1868, p. 436; also L, Lloyd, " Game Birds of Sweden," 1867, p. 412, also Pennant. On the sperin-whale see Mr. J. H. Thompson, in " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1367, p. 246. f See Scrope (" Art of Deer- Stalking," p. 17) on the locking of the horns with the Genus elaphus. Richardson, in " Fauna Bor. Amer- icana," 1829, p. 252, says that the wapiti, moose and reindeer have been found thus locked together. Sir A. Smith found at the Cape of Good Hope the skeletons of two gnus in the same condition. 572 THE DESCENT OF MAN. engaged with the English horse, while the other was driv- ing away the mares, and had already separated four from the rest. The capitan settled the matter hy driving the whole party into the corral, for the wild stallions would not leave the mares." Male animals which are provided with efficient cutting or tearing teeth for the ordinary purposes of life, such as the carnivora, insectivora, and rodents, are seldom furnished with weapons especially adapted lor fighting with their rivals. The case is very different with the males of many other animals. We see this in the horns of stags and of certain kinds of antelopes in which the females are hornless. With many animals the canine teeth in the upper or lower jaw, or in both, are much larger in the males than in the females, or are absent in the latter, with the exception sometimes of a hidden rudiment. Certain antelopes, the musk-deer, camel, horse, boar, various apes, seals, and the walrus, offer instances. In the females of the walrus the tusks are sometimes quite absent.* In the male elephant of India and in the male dugong f the upper incisors form offensive weapons. In the male narwhal the left canine alone is developed into the well-known, spirally-twisted, so- called horn, which is sometimes from nine to ten feet in length. It is believed that the males use these horns for fighting together; for "an unbroken one can rarely be got, and occasionally one may be found with the point of another jammed into the broken place. "J The tooth on the opposite side of the head in the male consists of a rudi- ment about ten inches in length, which is embedded in the jaw; but sometimes, though rarely, both are equally devel- oped on the two sides. In the female both are always rudi- mentary. The male cachalot has a larger head than that * Mr. Lament ("Seasons with the Sea-Horses," 1861, p. 143) says that a good tusk of the male walrus weighs four pounds, and is longer than that of the female, which weighs about three pounds. The males are described as fighting ferociously. On the occasional absence of the tusks in the female, see Mr. R. Brown, " Proc. ZooL Soc.," 1868, p. 429. f Owen, " Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 283. | Mr. R. Brown, in "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1869, p, 553. See Prof Turner, in "Journal of Anat. and Phys., ; ' 1872, p. 76, on the homo- logical nature of these tusks. Also Mr. J. W. Clarke on two tusks being developed in the males, iu " Proc. Zoolog. Soo.," 1871, p. 48. MAMMALS. 573 of the female, and it no doubt aids him in his aquatic battles. Lastly, the adult male ornithorhynchus is provided with a remarkable apparatus, namely, a spur on the fore leg, closely resembling the poison-fang of a venomous snake ; but, according to Harting, the secretion from the gland is not poisonous ; and on the leg of the female there is a hollow, apparently for the reception of the spur.* When the males are provided with weapons which in the females are absent, there can hardly be a doubt that these serve for fighting with other males; and that they were acquired through sexual selection and were transmitted to the male sex alone. It is not probable, at least in most cases, that the females have been prevented from acquiring such weapons, on account of their being useless, super- fluous, or in some way injurious. On the contrary, as they are often used by the males for various purposes, more espe- cially as a defense against their enemies, it is a surprising fact that they are so poorly developed, or quite absent in the females of so many animals. With female deer the development during each recurrent season of great branch- ing horns, and with female elephants the development of immense tusks would be a great waste of vital power, sup- posing that they were of no use to the females. Conse- quently they would have tended to be eliminated in the female through natural selection; that is, if the successive variations were limited in their transmission to the female sex, for otherwise the weapons of the males would have been injuriously affected, and this would have been a greater evil. On the whole, and from the consideration of the fol- lowing facts, it seems probable that when the various weapons differ in the two sexes this has generally depended on the kind of transmission which has prevailed. As the reindeer is the one species in the whole family of deer in which the female is furnished with horns, though they are somewhat smaller, thinner and less branched than in the male, it might naturally be thought that at least, in this case, they must be of some special service to her. The female retains her horns from the time when they are fully developed, namely, in September, throughout the winter * Owen on the cachalot and Ornithorhynchus, ibid, vol. iii, pp 638, 641. Harting is quoted by Dr. Zouteveen in the Dutch translat of this work, vol. ii, p. 292. 574 THE DESCENT OF MAN. until April or May, when she brings forth her young. Mr. Crotch made particular inquiries for me in Norway, and it appears that the females at this season conceal themselves for about a fortnight in order to bring forth their young, and then reappear generally hornless. In Nova Scotia, however, as I hear from Mr. H. Reeks, the female some- times retains her horns longer. The male, on the other hand, casts his horns much earlier, toward the end of November. As both sexes have the same requirements and follow the same habits of life, and as the male is destitute of horns during the winter, it is improbable that they can be of any special service to the female during this season, which includes the larger part of the time during which she is horned. Nor is it" probable that she can have inherited horns from some ancient progenitor of the family of deer, for, from the fact of the females of so many species in all quarters of the globe not having horns, we may con- clude that this was the primordial character of the group.* The horns of the reindeer are developed at a most unusually early age; but what the cause of this may be is not known. The effect has apparently been the transfer- ence of the horns to both sexes. We should bear in mind that horns are always transmitted through the female, and that she has a latent capacity for their development, as we see in old or diseased females, f Moreover, the females of some other species of deer exhibit either normally or occa- sionally rudiments of horns; thus the female of Cervulus moschatus has " bristly tufts, ending in a knob instead of a horn;" and "in most specimens of the female wapiti ( Cervus canadensis) there is a sharp, bony protuberance in the place of the horn."| From these several considera- *On the structure and shedding of the horns of the reindeer, Hoffberg, " Amoenitates Acad.," vol. iv, 1788, p. 149. See Richard- son, "Fauna Bor. Americana," p. 241, in regard to the American variety or species; also Maj. W. Ross King, " The Sportsman in Canada/' 1866, p. 80. t Isidore Geoffrey St. Hilaire, " Essais de Zoolog. Generate," 1841, p. 513. Other masculine characters besides the horns, are sometimes wmilarly transferred to the female; thus Mr. Boner, in speaking of n old female chamois ("Chamois Hunting in the Mountains of Bavaria," 1860, 2nd edit., p. 363) says, "not only was the head very male-looking, but along the back there was a ridge of long hair, usually to be found only in bucks." JOn the Cervulus, Dr. Gray, "Catalogue of Mammalia in th MAMMALS. 675 tions we may conclude that the possession of fairly well- developed horns by the female reindeer is due to the males having first acquired them as weapons for fighting with other males; and secondarily to their development from Borne unknown cause at an unusually early age in the males and their consequent transference to both sexes. Turning to the sheath-horned ruminants: with ante- lopes a graduated series can be formed, beginning with species, the females of which are completely destitute of horns passing on to those which have horns so small as to be almost rudimentary (as with the Antilocapra amencana, in which species they are present in only one out of four or five females*) to those which have fairly developed horns, but manifestly smaller and thinner than in the male and sometimes of a different shapef and ending with those in which both sexes have horns of equal size. As with the reindeer, so with antelopes, there exists, as previously shown, a relation between the period of the devel- opment of the horns and their transmission to one or both sexes; it is therefore probable that their presence or ab- sence in the females of some species and their more or less perfect condition in the females of other species depends, not on their being of any special use, but simply in inherit- ance. It accords with this view that even in the same restricted genus both sexes of some species, and the males alone of others, are thus provided. It is also a remarkable fact that, although the females of Antilope bezoartica are normally destitute of horns, Mr. Blyth has seen no less than three females thus furnished; and there was no reason to suppose that they were old or diseased. In all the wild species of goats and sheep the horns are larger in the male than in the female, and are sometimes quite absent in the latter. J In several domestic breeds of these two animals, the males alone are furnished with British Museum," part iii, p. 220. On the Cervutt canadensis or wapiti, see Hon. J. D. Caton, "Ottawa Acad. of Nat. Sciences," May, 1868, p. 9, *I am indebted to Dr. Canfield for this information; see also his paper in "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1866, p. 105. f For instance, the horns of the female Ant. eucJiore resemble those of a distinct species, viz., the Ant. dorcas var. Corine, see Desmarest, " Mammalogie," p. 455. JGray, "Catalogue Marnm. Brit. Mus.," part iii, 1852, p. 160. 576 THE DESCENT OF MAN. horns; and in some breeds, for instance, in the sheep of North Wales, though both sexes are properly homed, the ewes are very liable to be hornless. I have been informed by a trustworthy witness, who purposely inspected a flock of these same sheep during the lambing season, that the horns at birth are generally more fully developed in the male than in the female. Mr. J. Peel crossed his Lonk sheep, both sexes of which always bear horns, with hornless Lei-\ cesters and hornless Shropshire Downs; and the result was that the male offspring had their horns considerably reduced, while the females were wholly destitute of them. These several facts indicate that, with sheep, the horns are a much less firmly fixed character in the females than in the males; and this leads us to look at the horns as properly of masculine origin. With the adult musk-ox (Ovibos moschatus) the horns of the male are larger than those of the female, and in the latter the bases do not touch. * In regard to ordinary cattle Mr. Blyth remarks: " In most of the wild bovine animals the horns are both longer and thicker in the bull than in the cow, and in the cowbanteng (Bos sondaicus) the horns are remarkably small, and inclined much back- ward. In the domestic races of cattle, both of the humped and humpless types, the horns are short and thick in the bull, longer and more slender in the cow and ox; and in the Indian buffalo, they are shorter and thicker in the bull, longer and more slender in thp cow. In the wild gaour (B. gaurus) the horns are mostly both longer and thicker in the bull than in the cow/'f Dr. Forsyth Major also informs me that a fossil skull, believed to be that of the female Bos estruscus, has been found in Val d'Arno, which is wholly without horns. In the Rhinoceros simus, as I may add, the horns of the female are generally longer but less powerful than in the male; and in some other species of rhinoceros they are said to be shorter in the female. \ From these various facts we may infer as probable that horns of all kinds, even when they are equally devel- oped in the two sexes, were primarily acquired by the male * Richardson, " Fauna Bor. Americana," p. 278. f " Land and Water," 1867, p. 346. fSir Andrew Smith, "Zoology of S. Africa," pi. xix. Owen. " Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 624. MAMMALS. 577 in order to conquer other males, and have been transferred more or less completely to the female. The effects of castration deserve notice, as thro wing light on this same point. Stags after the operation never renew their horns. The male reindeer, however, must be excepted, as after castration he does renew them. This fact, as well as the possession of horns by both sexes, seems at first to prove that the horns in this species do not constitute a sexual character; * but as they are developed at a very early age, before the sexes differ in constitution, it is not surprising that they should be unaffected by castration, even if they were aboriginally acquired by the male. With sheep botli sexes properly bear horns; and I am informed that with Welsh sheep the horns of the males are con- siderably reduced by castration ; but the degree depends much on the age at which the operation is performed, as is likewise the case with other animals. Merino rams have large horns, while the ewes, "generally speaking, are with- out horns;" and in this breed castration seems to produce a somewhat greater effect, so that if performed at an early age the horns " remain almost undeveloped. "\ On the Guinea coast there is a breed in which the females never bear horns, and, as Mr. Winwood Keade informs me, the rams after castration are quite destitute of them. With cattle the horns of the males are much altered by castration; for, instead of being short and thick, they become longer than those of the cow, but otherwise resemble them. The Ant Hope bezoartica offers a somewhat analogous case; the males have long straight spiral horns nearly parallel to each other, and directed backward; Ljuo females occasionally bear horns, but these when present, lire of a very different shape, for they are not spiral, and upiejiding widely bend round with the points forward. Now it is a remarkable fact that in the castrated male, as Mi Blyth informs me, the horns are of the same peculiar shape us in the female, but longer *This is the conclusion of SekHHz, "Die Darwinsche Theorie," 1871, p. 47. f I arn much obliged to Prot. V ictor Carus for having made in- quiries for me in Saxony on this subject. H. von Nathusius (" Viehzucht," 1872, p. 64) says <.liat the horns of sheep castrated at an early period, either altogether disappear or remain as mere rudi- ments; but I do not know whetliei he refers to merinos or to ordinary breeds. 578 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. and thicker. If we may judge from analogy, the female probably shows us in these two cases of cattle and the antelope the former condition of the horns in some early progenitor of each species. But why castration should lead to the reappearance of an early condition of the horns cannot be explained with any certainty. Nevertheless, it seems probable, that in nearly the same manner as the con- stitutional disturbance in the offspring, caused by a cross between two distinct species or races, often leads to the reappearance of long-lost characters;* so here the disturb- ance in the constitution of the individual, resulting from castration, produces the same effect. The tusks of the elephant in the different species or races differ according to sex, nearly as do the horns of ruminants. In India and Malacca the males alone are provided with well-developed tusks. The elephant of Ceylon is con- sidered by most naturalists as a distinct race, but by some as a distinct species, and here " not one in a hundred is found with tusks, the few that possess them being exclu- sively males."f The African elephant is undoubtedly dis- tinct, and the female has large well-developed tusks, though not so large as those of the male. These differences in the tusks of the several races and species of elephants the great variability of the horns of deer, as notably in the wild reindeer the occasional presence of horns in the female Antilope Bezoartica and their frequent absence in the female of Antilocapra americana the pres- ence of two tusks in some few male narwhals the complete absence of tusks in some female walruses are all instances of the extreme variability of secondary sexual characters, and of their liability to differ in closely allied forms. Although tusks and horns appear in all cases to have been primarily developed as sexual weapons, they often serve other purposes. The elephant uses his tusks in attacking the tiger; according to Bruce, he scores the trunks of trees until they can be thrown down easily, and he likewise thus extracts the farinaceous cores of palms; in *I have given various experiments and other evidence proving that this is the case, in my " Variation of Animate and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, 1868, pp. 39-47. fSir J. Emerson Tennent, "Ceylon," 1859, vol. ii, p. 274. For Malacca, "Journal of Indian Archipelago," vol. iv, p. 857. MAMMALS. 579 Africa lie often uses one tusk, 'always the same, to probe the ground and thus ascertain whether it will bear his weight. The common bull defends the herd with his horns; and the elk in Sweden has been known, according to Lloyd, to strike a wolf dead with a single blow of his great horns. Many similar facts could be given. One of the most curious secondary uses to which the horns of an animal may be occasionally put is that observed by Capt. Hutton * with the wild goat (Capra cegagrus) of the Hima- layas and, as it is also said with the ibex, namely, that when the male accidentally falls from a height he bends inward his head, and, by alighting on his massive horns, breaks the shock. The female cannot thus use her horns, which are smaller, but from her more quiet disposition she does not need this strange kind of shield so much. Each male animal uses his weapons in his own peculiar fashion. The common ram makes a charge and butts with such force with the bases of his horns that I have seen a powerful man knocked over like a child. Goats and cer- tain species of sheep, for instance the Ovis cydoceros of Afghanistan,! rear on their hind legs, and then not only butt, but " make a cut down and a jerk up, with the ribbed front of their cimeter-shaped horn, as with a saber. When the 0. cyclocerus attacked a large domestic ram, who was a noted bruiser, he conquered him by the sheer novelty of his mode of fighting, always closing at once with his adversary, and catching him across the face and nose with a sharp, drawing jerk of the head, and then bounding out of the way before the blow could be returned." In Pem- brokeshire a male goat, the master of a flock which during several generations had run wild, was known to have killed several males in single combat; this goat possessed enormous horns, measuring thirty-nine inches in a straight line from tip to tip. The common bull, as every one knows, gores and tosses his opponent; but the Italian buffalo is said never to use his horns; he gives a tremendous blow with his convex forehead, and then tramples on his fallen enemy with his knees an instinct which the common bull doea * " Calcutta Journal of Nat. Hist.," vol. ii, 1843, p. 526. 'Mr. Blyth, in "Land and Water," March, 1867, p. 134, on the authority of Capt. Hutton and others. For the wild Pembrokeshire goats, see the "Field," 1869, p- 150 580 THE DESCENT OF MAN. not possess.* Hence, a dog who pins a buffalo by the nose is immediately crushed. We must, however, remember that the Italian buffalo has been long domesticated, and it is by no means certain that the wild parent-form had simi- lar horns. Mr. Bartlett informs me that when a female Cape buffalo (Bubalus caffer) was turned into an inclosure with a bull of the same species she attacked him, and he in return pushed her about with great violence. But it was manifest to Mr. Bartlett that, had not the bull shown dignified forbearance, he could easily have killed her by a single lateral thrust with his immense horns. The giraffe uses his short, hair- covered horns, which are rather longer in the male than in the female, in a curious manner; for, Fig. 63. Oryx leucoryx, male herd," Bailly "Sur 1'usage des Comes," " Annales des Sc. >V f " " turn, ii, 1824, p. 371. MAMMALS. 583 his antlers were so long that he could not roll his head without raising them on one side, while on the other they touched the ground. " The stag by this procedure gradu- ally drove the party of rescuers backward to a distance Fig. 64. Strepsloeros Kudu (from Sir Andrew Smith's " Zoology of South Africa"). of one hundred and fifty or two hundred feet, and tho attacked man was killed.* * See a most interesting account in the appendix to IIou, J. D. Caton's paper, as above Quoted. 584 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Although the horns of stags are efficient weapons, there can, I think, be no doubt that a single point would have been much more dangerous than a branched antler; and Judge Caton, who has had large experience with deer, fully concurs in this conclusion. Nor do the branching horns, though highly important as a means of defense against rival stags, appear perfectly well adapted for this purpose, as they are liable to become interlocked. The sus- picion has, therefore, crossed my mind that they may serve in part as ornaments. That the branched antlers of stags as well as the elegant lyrated horns of certain antelopes, with their graceful double curvature (fig. 64), are orna- mental in our eyes, no one will dispute. If, then, the horns, like the splendid accou term cuts of the knights of old, add to the noble appearance of stags and antelopes, they may have been modified partly for this purpose, though mainly for actual service in battle; but I have no evidence in favor of this belief. An interesting case has lately been published, from which it appears that the horns of a deer in one district in the United States are now being modified through sexual and natural selection. A writer in an excellent American journal * says that he has hunted for the last twenty-one years in the Adirondacks, where the Cervus virginianus abounds. About fourteen years ago he first heard of spike- liorn lucks. These became from year to year more common; about five years ago he shot one, and afterward, another, and now they are frequently killed. " The spike- horn differs greatly from the common antler of the C. vir- ginianus. It consists of a single spike, more slender than the antler, and scarcely half so long, projecting forward from the brow and terminating in a very sharp point. It gives a considerable advantage to its possessor over the common buck. Besides enabling him to run more swiftly through the thick woods and underbrush (every hunter knows that does and yearling bucks run much more rapidly than the large bucks when armed with their cumbrous antlers), the spike-horn is a more effective weapon than the common antler. With this advantage the spike - horn bucks are gaining upon the common bucks, and may, in time, entirely supersede them in the Adirondacks. TJn- " The American Naturali*W" Dec., 1869, p. 553. MAMMALS. 585 doubtedly, the first spike-horn buck was merely an acci- dental freak of nature. But his spike-horns gave him an advantage, and enabled him to propagate his peculiarity. His descendants, having a like advantage, have propagated the peculiarity in a constantly increasing ratio, till they are slowly crowding the antlered deer from the region they inhabit." A critic has well objected to this account by asking, why, if the simple horns are now so advantageous, were the branched antlers of the parent-form ever devel- oped? To this I can only answer by remarking that a new mode of attack with new weapons might be a great advant- age, as shown by the case of the Ovis cycloceros, who thus conquered a domestic ram famous for his fighting power. Though the branched antlers of a stag are well adapted for fighting with his rivals, and, though it might be an advantage to the prong-horned variety slowly to acquire long and branched horns, if he had to fight only with others of the same kind, yet it by no means follows that branched horns would be the best fitted for conquering a foe differently armed. In the foregoing case of the Oryx leucoryx it is almost certain that the victory would rest with an antelope having short horns, and who, therefore, did not need to kneel down, though an oryx might profit by having still longer horns if he fought only with his proper rivals. Male quadrupeds, which are furnished with tusks, use them in various ways, as in the case of horns. The boar strikes laterally and upward; the musk-deer downward with serious effect.* The walrus, though having so short a neck and so unwieldly a body, ' ' can strike either upward or downward or sideways with equal dexterity."! I was informed by the late Dr. Falconer, that the Indian elephant fights in a different manner according to the position and curvature of his tusks. When they are directed forward and upward he is able to fling a tiger to a great distance it is said to even thirty feet; when they are short and turned downward he endeavors suddenly to pin the tiger to the ground, and, in consequence, is dangerous to the rider, who is Jiable to be jerked off the howdah.J * Pallas, "SpicilegiaZoologica," fasc. xiii, 1779, p. 18. f Lament, " Seasons with the Sea-Horses," 1861, p. 141. j See also Corse (" Philosoph. Transact.," 1799, p. 212) on the 586 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Very few male quadrupeds possess weapons of two dis- tinct kinds specially adapted for fighting with rival males. The male muntjac-deer (Cervulus), however, offers an ex- ception, as he is provided with horns, and exserted canine teeth. But we may infer from what follows that one form of weapon has often been replaced in the course of ages by another. With ruminants the development of horns gen- erally stands in an inverse relation with that of even mod- erately developed canine teeth. Thus camels, guanacoes, chevrotains and musk-deer are hornless, and they have efficient canines; these teeth being " always of smaller size in the females than in the males. " The Camelidge have, in addition to their true canines, a pair of canine-shaped in- cisors in their upper jaws.* Male deer and antelopes, on the other hand, possess horns, and they rarely have canine teeth; and these, when present, are always of small size, so that it is doubtful whether they are of any service in their battles. In Antilope montana they exist only as rudiments in the young male, disappearing as he grows old; and they are absent in the female at all ages; but the females of cer- tain other antelopes and of certain deer have been known occasionally to exhibit rudiments of these teeth, f Stallions have small canine teeth, which are either quite absent or rudimentary in the mare; but they do not appear to be used in fighting, for stallions bite with their incisors, and do not open their mouths wide like camels and guanacoes. Whenever the adult male possesses canines, now inefficient, while the female has either none or mere rudiments, we may conclude that the early male progenitor of the species was provided with efficient canines, which have been par- tially transferred to the females. The reduction of these teeth in the males seems to have followed from some change manner in which the short-tusked Mooknah variety attacks other elephants. *Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 349. fSee Riippell (in " Proc Zoolog. Soc.," Jan. 12, 1836, p. 3) on the canines in deer and antelopes, with a note by Mr. Martin on a female American deer. See also Falconer (" Palaeont. Memoirs and Notes," vol. i, 1868, p, 576) on canines in an adult female deer. In old males of the musk-deer the canines (Phallas, " Spic. Zoolog.," fasc. xiii, 1779, p. 18) sometimes grow to the length of three inches, while in old females a rudiment projects scarcely half an inch above the gums. MAXXAL8. 58? in their manner of fighting, often (but not in the horse) caused by the development of new weapons. Tusks and horns are manifestly of high importance to their possessors, for their development consumes much organized matter. A single tusk of the Asiatic elephant one of the extinct woolly species and of the African ele- phant have been known to weigh respectively one hundred and fifty, one hundred and sixty and one hundred and eighty pounds; and even greater weights have been given by some authors.* With deer, in which the horns are peri- odically renewed, the drain on the constitution must be greater; the horns, for instance, of the moose weigh from fifty to sixty pounds, and those of the extinct Irish elk from sixty to seventy pounds the skull of the latter weighing on an average only five pounds and a quarter. Although the horns are not periodically renewed in sheep, yet their development, in the opinion of many agricultur- ists, entails a sensible loss to the breeder. Stags, more- over, in escaping from beasts of prey are loaded with an additional weight for the race, and are greatly retarded in passing through a woody country. The moose, for in- stance, with horns extending five and a half feet from tip to tip, although so skillful in their use that he will not touch or break a twig when walking quietly, cannot act so dexterously while rushing away from a pack of wolves. " During his progress he holds his nose up so as to lay the horns horizontally back; and in this attitude cannot see the ground distinctly. "\ The tips of the horns of the great Irish elk were actually eight feet apart! While the horns are covered with velvet, which lasts with red deer for about twelve weeks, they are extremely sensitive to a blow; so that in Germany the stags at this time somewhat 'change their habits, and, avoiding dense forests, frequent young woods and low thickets. J These facts remind us that male birds have acquired ornamental plumes at the * Emerson Tennent, "Ceylon," 1859, vol. ii, p. 275; Owen, -"British Fossil Mammals," 1846, p. 245. f Richardson, "Fauna Bor. Americana," on the moose, Alcespal- mata, pp. 236, 237; on the expanse of the horns, " Land and Water," 1869, p. 143. See also Owen, "British Fossil Mammals," on the Irish elk, pp. 447, 455. $ " Forest Creatures," by C. Boner, 1861, p. 60. 588 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. cost of retarded flight, and other ornaments at the cost of gome loss of power in their battles with rival males. With mammals, when, as is often the case, the sexes differ in size, the males are almost always larger and stronger. I am informed by Mr. Gould that this holds good in a marked manner with the marsupials of Aus- tralia, the males of which appear to continue growing until an unusually late age. But the most extraordinay, case is that of one of the seals (Callorliinus ursimts) a full-grown female weighing less than one-sixth of a full- grown male.* Dr. Gill remarks that it is with the polyg- amous seals, the males of which are well known to fight savagely together, that the sexes differ much in size; the monogamous species differing but little. Whales also afford evidence of the relation existing between the pug- nacity of the males and their large size compared with that of the females; the males of the right-whales do not fight together, and they are not larger, tiut rather smaller, than their females; on the other hand, male sperm-whales fight much together, and their bodies are "often found scarred with the imprint of their rival's teeth," and they are double the size of the females. The greater strength of the male, as Hunter long ago remarked, f is invariably dis- played in those parts of the body which are brought into action in fighting with rival males for instance, in the massive neck of the bull. Male quadrupeds are also more courageous and pugnacious than the females. There can be little doubt that these characters have been gained, partly through sexual selection, owing to a long series of victo- ries, by the stronger and more courageous males over the weaker, and partly through the inherited effects of use. It is probable that the successive variations in strength, size, and courage, whether due to mere variability or to the effects of use, by the accumulation of which male quadru- peds have acquired these characteristic qualities, occurred rather late in life, and were consequently to a large extent limited in their transmission to the same sex. *See the very interesting paper by Mr. J. A. Allen in "Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoolog. of Cambridge, United States," vol. ii, No. 1, p. 82. The weights were ascertained by a careful observer, Capt, Bryant. Dr. Gill in " The American Naturalist," Jan., 1871; Prof. Shaler on the relative size of the sexes of whales, ''American Naturalist," Jan. 1873. f " Animal Economy," p. 45 MAMMALS. 589 From these considerations I was anxious to obtain infor- mation as to the Scotch deer-hound, the sexes of which differ more in size than those of any other breed (though blood-hounds differ considerably), or than in any wild canine species known to me. Accordingly, I applied to Mr. Cupples, well known for his success with this breed, who has weighed and measured many of his own dogs, and who has with great kindness collected for me the following facts from various sources. Fine male dogs, measured at the shoulder, range from 28 inches, which is low, to 33 or even 34 inches in height ; and in weight from 80 pounds, which is light, to 120 pounds, or even more. The females range in height from 23 to 27, or even to 28 inches ; and in weight from 50 to 70, or even 80 pounds.* Mr. Cupples concludes that from 95 to 100 pounds for the male, and 70 for the female, would be a safe average; but there is reason to believe that formerly both sexes attained a greater weight. Mr. Cup- pies has weighed puppies when a fortnight old; in one litter the average Aveight of four males exceeded that of two females by six and a half ounces; in another litter the average weight of four males exceeded that of one female by less than one ounce; the same males when three weeks old exceeded the female by seven and a half ounces, and at the age of six weeks by nearly fourteen ounces. Mr. Wright, of Yeldersley House, in a letter to Mr. Cupples says: "I have taken notes on the sizes and weights of puppies of many litters, and, as far as my experience goes, dog puppies, as a rule, differ very little from bitches till they arrive at about five or six months old; and then the dogs begin to increase, gaining upon the bitches both in weight and size. At birth and for several weeks afterward a bitch-puppy will occasionally be larger than any of the dogs, but they are invariably beaten by them later." Mr. McNeill, of Colonsay, concludes that " the males do not attain their full growth till over two years old, though the females attain it sooner." According to Mr. Cupples' * See also Richardson's " Manual on the Dog," p. 59. Much valu- able information on the Scottish deer-hound is given by Mr. Mc- Neill, who first called attention to the inequality in size between the sexes, in Scrope's " Art of Deer Stalking." I hope that Mr. Cupples will keep to his intention of publishing a full account and history of this famous breed. 590 THE DESCENT OF MAN. experience, male dogs go on growing in stature till they are from twelve to eighteen months old, and in weight till from eighteen to twenty-four months old; while the females cease increasing in stature at the age of from nine to four- teen or fifteen months, and in weight at the age of from twelve to fifteen months. From these various statements it is clear that the full difference in size between the male and female Scotch deer-hound is not acquired until rather late in life. The males almost exclusively are used for coursing, for, as Mr. Me- Neill informs me, the fe- males have not sufficient strength and Aveight to pull down a full-grown deer. From the names used in old legends it appears, as I hear from Mr. Cupples, that at a very ancient period the males were the most celebrated, the females being mentioned only as the mothers of famous Pig. 05. Head of common wild boar, m *,.-. Ttnnna. Aiim-nn prime of life (from Brehm). dogS. Hence, during many generations it is the male which has been chiefly tested for strength, size, speed and courage, and the best will have been bred from. As, however, the males do not attain their full dimensions until rather late in life they will have tended, in accordance with the law often indicated, to transmit their characters to their male off spring alone; and thus the great inequality in size between the sexes of the Scotch deer-hound may probably be accounted for. The males of some few quadrupeds possess organs or parts developed solely as a means of defense against the attacks of other males. Some kinds of deer use, as we have seen, the upper branches of their horns chiefly or exclusively for defending themselves; and the Oryx ante- lope, as I am informed by Mr. Bartlett, fences most skill- fully with his long, gently curved horns ; but these are likewise used as organs o"f offense. The same observer remarks that rhinoceroses in fighting parry each other's sidelong blows with their horns, which clatter loudly MAMMALS. 591 together, as do the tusks of boars. Although wild boars fight desperately, they seldom, according to Brehm, receive fatal wounds, as the blows fall on each other's tusks, or on the layer of gristly skin covering the shoulder, called by the German hunters the shield; and here we have a part specially modified for defense. With boars in the prime of life (fig. 65) the tusks in the lower jaw are used for fighting, but they become in old age, as Brehm states, BO Fig. 66, Skull of the Babirusa Pig (from Wallace's " Malay Archipelago"). much curved inward and upward over the snout that they can no longer be used in this way. They may, however, still serve, and even more effectively, as a means of defense. In compensation for the loss of the lower tusks as weapons of offense those in the upper jaw, which always project a little laterally, increase in old age so much in length and curve so much upward that they can be used for attack. Nevertheless, an old boar is not so dangerous to man as one at the age of six or seven years.* ~~~* Brehm, " Thierleben," B. ii, ss. 729-733. 592 fHE DESCENT OF MAN. In the full-grown male Babirusa pig of Celebes (fig. 66), the lower tusks are formidable weapons, like those of the European boar in the prime of life, while the upper tusks are so long and have their points so much curled inward, sometimes even touching the forehead, that they are utterly useless as weapons of attack. They more nearly resemble horns than teeth, and are so manifestly useless as teeth that the animal was formerly supposed to rest his head by hook- ing them on to a branch! Their convex surfaces, however, if the head were held a little laterally, would serve as an Fig. 67. Head of female Ethiopian wart-hog, from " Proo. Zool. Soo." 1869, showing the same characters as the male, though on a reduced scale. N. B. When the engraving was first made I was under the impression that it represented the male. excellent guard; and hence, perhaps, it is that in old animals they "are generally broken off, as if by fighting."* Here, then, we have the curious case of the upper tusks of the Babirusa regularly assuming during the prime of life a structure which apparently renders them fitted only for defense ; Avhile in the European boar the lower tusks assume in a less degree and only during old age nearly the same form, and then serve in like manner solely for defense. In the wart-hog ( Phacochoerus cethiopicus] (fig. 67) the * See Mr. Wallace's interesting account of this animal, " The Malay Archipelago," 1869, vol. i, p. 435, MAMMALS. 593 tusks in the upper jaw of the male curve upward during the prime of life, and from being pointed serve as formid- able weapons. The tusks in the lower jaw are sharper than those in the upper, but from their shortness it seems hardly possible that they can be used as weapons of attack. They must, however, greatly strengthen those in the upper jaw, from being ground so as to fit closely against their bases. Neither the upper nor the lower tusks appear to,f have been specially modified to act as guards, though no doubt they are to a certain extent used for this purpose. But the wart-hog is not destitute of other special means of protection, for it has on each side of the face, beneath the eyes, a rather stiff, yet flexible cartilaginous oblong pad (see fig. 67), which projects two or three inches outward; and it appeared to Mr. Bartlett and myself, when viewing the living animal, that these pads, when struck from beneath by the tusks of an opponent, would be turned upward, and would thus admirably protect the somewhat prominent eyes. I may add, on the authority of Mr. Bartlett, that these boars when fight- ing stand directly face to face. Lastly, the African river-hog (PotomocJioerus penicil- latus) has a hard cartilaginous knob on each side of the face beneath the eyes, which answers to the flexible pad of the wart-hog; it has also two bony prominences on the upper jaw above the nostrils. A boar of this species in the Zoological Gardens recently broke into the cage of the wart-hog. They fought all night long, and were found in the morning much exhausted, but not seriously wounded. It is a significant fact, as showing the purposes of the above described projections and excrescences, that these were covered with blood, and were scored and abraded in an extraordinary manner. Although the males of so many members of the pig family are provided with weapons, and, as we have just seen, with means of defense, these weapons seem to have been acquired within a rather late geological period. Dr. For- syth Major specifies* several miocene species, in none of which do the tusks appear to have been largely developed in the males; and Prof. Eiitimeyer was formerly struck with this same fact. *" Atti della Soc. Italiana di Sc. Nat." 1873, vol. xv, fasc. iv. 594 THE DESCENT OF MAN. The mane of the lion forms a good defense against the attacks of rival lions, the one danger to which he is liable; for the males, as Sir A. Smith informs me, engage in ter- rible battles, and a young lion dares not approach an old one. In 1857 a tiger at Bromwich broke into the cage of a lion and a fearful scene ensued; "the lion's inane saved his neck and head from being much injured, but the tiger at last succeeded in ripping up his belly, and in a few minutes he was dead/' * The broad ruff round the throat and chin of the Canadian lynx (Felis canadensis) is much longer in the male than in the female; but whether it serves as a defense I do not know. Male seals are well known to fight desperately together, and the males of cer- tain kinds ( Otaria jubata) f have great manes, while the females have small ones or none. The male baboon of the Cape of Good Hope (Cynoceplialus porcarius) has a much longer mane and larger canine teeth than the female; and the mane probably serves as a protection, for, on asking the keepers in the Zoological Gardens, without giving them any clew to my object, whether any of the monkeys especially attacked each other by the nape of the neck, I was answered that this was not the case, except with the above baboon. In the Hamadryas baboon, Ehrenberg compares the mane of the adult male to that of a young lion, while in the young of both sexes and in the female the mane is almost absent. It appeared to me probable that the immense woolly mane of the male American bison, which reaches almost to the ground, and is much more developed in the males than in the females, served as a protection to them in their ter- rible battles; but an experienced hunter told Judge Caton that he had never observed anything which favored this belief. The stallion has a thicker and fuller mane than the mare; and I have made particular inquiries of two great trainers and breeders, who have had charge of many entire horses, and am assured that they . " invariably * " The Times," Nov. 10, 1857. In regard to the Canada lynx, see Audubon and Bachman, " Quadrupeds of North America," 1846, p. 139. fDr. Murie, on Otaria, "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1869, p. 109. Mr. J. A. Allen, in the paper above quoted (p. 75), doubts whether the hair, which is longer on the neck in the male than in the female, deserves to be called a inane.. MAMMALS. 595 endeavor to seize one another by the neck." It does not, however, follow from the foregoing statements, that when the hair on the neck serves as a defense, that it was origi- nally developed for this purpose, though this is probable in gome cases, as in that of the lion. I am informed by Mr. MeNTeill that the long hairs on the throat of the stag ( Cervus elaplms) serve as a great protection to him when hunted, for the dogs generally endeavor to seize him by the throat; but it is not probable that these hairs were specially developed for this purpose; otherwise the young and the females would have been equally protected. Choice in Pairing by Either Sex of Quadrupeds. Before describing, in the next chapter, the differences between the sexes in voice, odors emitted and ornaments, it will be con- venient here to consider whether the sexes exert any choice in their unions. Does the female prefer any particular male, either before or after the males may have fought together for supremacy; or does the male, when not a polygamist, select any particular female? The general impression among breeders seems to be that the male accepts any female; and this, owing to his eagerness, is, in most cases, probably the truth. Whether the female, as a general rule, indifferently accepts any male is much more doubtful. In the fourteenth chapter, on birds, a consider- able body of direct and indirect evidence was advanced showing that the female selects her partner; and it would be a strange anomaly if female quadrupeds, which stand higher in the scale and have higher mental powers, did not generally, or at least often, exert some choice. The female could in most cases escape, if wooed by a male that did not please or excite her; and when pursued by several males, as commonly occurs, she would often have the opportunity, while they were fighting together, of escaping with some one male, or at least of temporarily pairing with him. This latter contingency has often been observed in Scot- land with female red deer, as I am informed by Sir Philip Egerton and others.* * Mr. Boner, in his excellent description of the habits of the red- deer in Germany (" Forest Creatures," 1861, p. 81) says, "while the stag is defending his rights against one intruder, another invades the sanctuary of his harern, and carries off trophy after trophy." Exactly the same thing occurs with seals. See Mr. J. A. Allen, ibid, p. 100. 596 THE DESCENT OF MAN. It is scarcely possible that much should be known about female quadrupeds iii a state of nature making any choice in their marriage unions. The following curious details on the courtship of one of the eared seals (CaUorJiinus ur sinus) are given* on the authority of Capt. feryant, who had ample opportunities for observation. He says: " Many of the females on their arrival at the island where they breed appear desirous of returning to some particular male, and frequently climb the outlying rocks to overlook the rookeries, calling out and listening as if for a familiar voice. Then changing to another place they do the same again ... As soon as a female reaches the shore, the nearest male goes down to meet her, making, meanwhile, a noise like the clucking of a hen to her chickens. He bows to her and coaxes her until he gets between her and the water so that she cannot escape him. Then his man- ner changes and with a harsh growl he drives her to a place in his harem. This continues until the lower row of harems is nearly full. Then the males higher up select the time when their more fortunate neighbors are off their guard to steal their wives. This they do by taking them in their mouths and lifting them over the heads of the other females and carefully placing them in their own harem, carrying them as cats do their kittens. Those still higher up pursue the same method until the whole space is occu- pied. Frequently a struggle ensues between two males for the possession of the same female, and both seizing her at once pull her in two or terribly lacerate her with their teeth. When the space is all filled, the old male walks around complacently reviewing his family, scolding those who crowd or disturb the others and fiercely driving off all intruders. This surveillance always keeps him actively occupied." As so little is known about the courtship of anima's in a state of nature, I have endeavored to discover how far our domesticated quadrupeds evince any choice in their unions. Dogs offer the best opportunity for observation, as they are carefully attended to and well understood. Many breeders have expressed a strong opinion on this head. Thus, Mr. Mayhew remarks: "The females are able to *Mr. J. A. Allen in "Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoolog. of Cambridge. United States," vol. ii, No. 1, p. 99. MAMMALS. 597 bestow their affections ; and tender recollections are as potent over them as they are known to be in other cases, where higher animals are concerned. Bitches are not always prudent in their loves, but are apt to fling them- selves away on curs of low degree. If reared with a com- panion of vulgar appearance, there often springs up between the pair a devotion which no time can afterward subdue. The passion, for such it really is, becomes of a more than romantic endurance." Mr. Mayhew, who attended chiefly to the smaller breeds, is convinced that the females are strongly attracted by males of a large size.* The well- known veterinary Elaine statesf that his own female pug became so attached to a spaniel, and a female setter to a cur, that in neither case would they pair with a dog of their own breed until several weeks had elapsed. Two similar and trustworthy accounts have been given me in regard to a female retriever and a spaniel, both of which became enamored with terrier dogs. Mr. Cupples informs me that he can personally vouch for the accuracy of the following more remarkable case, in which a valuable and wonderfully intelligent female terrier loved a retriever belonging to a neighbor to such a degree that she had often to be dragged away from him. After their permanent separation, although repeatedly showing milk in her teats, she would never acknowledge the court- ship of any other dog, and, to the regret of her owner, never bore puppies. Mr. Cupples also states that, in 1868, a female deerhound in his kennel thrice produced puppies, and on each occasion showed a marked preference for one of the largest and handsomest, but not the most eager, of four deerhonnds living with her, all in the prime of life. Mr. Cupples has observed that the female generally favors a dog whom she has associated with and knows; her shy- ness and timidity at first incline her against a strange dog. The male, on the contrary, seems rather inclined toward strange females. It appears to be rare when the male refuses any particular female, but Mr. Wright, of Yelders- ley- House, a great breeder of dogs, informs me that he has known some instances; he cites the case of one of his own *"Dogs: Their Management," by E. Mayhew, M. R. C. V. 8., 2d edit., 1864, pp. 187-192, f Quoted by Alex, WaOk% "On Intermarriage," 1838, p, 270; see also p. 244. 598 THE DESCENT OF MAN. deerhounds who would not take any notice of a particular female mastiff, so that another deerhound had to he employed. It would be superfluous to give, as I could, other instances, and I will only add that Mr. Barr, who has carefully bred many bloodhounds, states that in almost every instance particular individuals of opposite sexes show a decided preference for each other. Finally, Mr. Cup- pies, after attending to this subject for another year, lias written to me: "I have had full confirmation of my former statement that dogs in breeding form decided preferences for each other, being often influenced by size, bright color and individual characters, as well as by the degree of their previous familiarity." In regard to horses, Mr. Blenkiron, the greatest breeder of race-horses in the world, informs me that stallions are so frequently capricious in their choice, rejecting one mare and without any apparent cause taking to another, that various artifices have to be habitually used. The famous Monarque, for instance, would never consciously look at the dam of G-ladiateur, and a trick had to be practiced. We can partly see the reason why valuable race-horse stallions, which are in such demand as to be exhausted, should be so particular in their choice. Mr. Blenkiron has never known a mare reject a horse ; but this has occurred in Mr. Wright's stable, so that the mare had to be cheated. Prosper Lucas* quotes various statements from French authorities, and remarks: " On voit des 6talons qui s'6pren- nent d'une jument, et negligent toutes les autres." He gives, on the authority of Baelen, similar facts in regard to bulls; and Mr. H. Reeks assures me that a famous short- horn bull, belonging to his father, "invariably refused to be matched with a black cow." Hoffberg, in describing the domesticated reindeer of Lapland, says: "Foeminae majores et fortiores mares prse caeteris admittunt, ad eos confugiunt, a junioribus agitatae, qui hos in fugam con- jiciunt." f A clergyman, who has bred many pigs, asserts that sows often reject one boar and immediately accept another. From these facts there can be no doubt that, with most of our domesticated quadrupeds, strong individual antipa- * " TraiiS de l'H6r6d. Nat.," torn, ii, 1850, p. 296. f " Amcenitates Acad.," vol. iv, 1788, p. 160. MAMMALS. 599 thies and preferences are frequently exhibited, and much more commonly by the female than by the male. This being the case, it is improbable that the unions of quadru- peds in a state of nature should be left to mere chance. It is much more probable that the females are allured or excited by particular males who possess certain characters in a higher degree than other males; but what these char- acters are we can seldom or never discover with certainty. 600 THE DESCENT OF MAN. CHAPTER XVIII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALS continued. Voice Remarkable sexual peculiarities in seals Odor Develop- ment of tlie liair Color of the hair and skin Anomalous case of the female being more ornamented than the male Color and ornaments due to sexual selection Color acquired for the sake of protection Color, though common to both sexes, often due to sexual selection On the disappearance of spots and stripes in adult quadrupeds On the colors and ornaments of the quad- rumana Summary. QUADRUPEDS use their voices for various purposes, as a signal of danger, as a call from one member of a troop to another, or from the mother to her lost offspring, or from the latter for protection to their mother; but such uses need not here be considered. We are concerned only with the difference between the voice* of the sexes; for instance, between that of the lion and lioness, or of the bull and cow. Almost all male animals use their voices much more during the rutting-season than at any other time ; and some, as the giraffe and porcupine,* are said to be com- pletely mute excepting at this season. As the throats (i.e. of the larynx and thyroid bodies f) of stags periodically become enlarged at the beginning of the breeding-season, it might be thought that their powerful voices must be somehow of high importance to them; but this is very doubtful. From information given to me by two experi- enced observers, Mr. McNeill and Sir P. Egerton, it seems that young, stags under three years old do not roar or bellow; and that the old ones begin bellowing at the com- mencement of the breeding-season, at first only occasionally and moderately, while they restlessly wander about in search of the females. Their battles are prefaced by loud *Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 686. f Ibid, p. 595. MAMMALS. 601 and prolonged bellowing, but during the actual conflict they are silent. Animals of all kinds which habitually use their voices utter various noises under any strong emotion, as when enraged and preparing to fight ; but this may merely be the result of nervous excitement, which leads to the spasmodic contraction of almost all the muscles of the body, as when a man grinds his teeth and clenches his fists in rage or agony. No doubt stags challenge each other to mortal combat by bellowing; but those with the more powerful voices, unless at the same time the stronger, better- armed and more courageous, would not gain any advantage over their rivals. It is possible that the roaring of the lion may be of some service to him by striking terror into his adversary; for when enraged he likewise erects his mane and thus instinct- ively tries to make himself appear as terrible as possible. But it can hardly be supposed that the bellowing of the stag, even if it be of service to him in this way, can have been important enough to have led to the periodical enlargement of the throat. Some writers suggest that the bellowing serves as a call to the female; but the expe- rienced observers above quoted inform me that female deer do not search for the male, though the males search eagerly for the females, as indeed might be expected from what we know of the habits of other male quadrupeds. The voice of the female, on the other hand, quickly brings to her one or more stags,* as is well known to the hunters who in wild countries imitate her cry. If we could believe that the male had the power to excite or allure the female by his voice, the periodical enlargement of his vocal organs would be intelligible on the principle of sexual selection, together with inheritance limited to the same sex and season; but we have no evidence in favor of this view. As the case stands, the loud voice of the stag during the breeding-season does not seem to be of any special service to him, either during his courtship or battles, or in any other way. But may we not believe that the frequent use of the voice, under the strong excitement of love, jealousy and rage, continued during many generations, may at last *See, for instance, Maj. W. Ross King ("The Sportsman in Canada," 1866, pp. 53, 131) on the habits of the moose and wild reindeer. 602 THE DESCENT OF MAN. have produced an inherited effect on the vocal or$ JIB of the stag as well as of other male animals ? This appears to me, in our present state of knowledge, the most probable view. The voice of the adult male gorilla is tremendous, and he is furnished with a laryngeal sack, as is the adult male orang.* The gibbons rank among the noisiest of monkeys, and the Sumatra species (Hylobates syndactylus} are also furnished with an air sack; but Mr. Blyth, who has had opportunities for observation, does not believe that the male is noiser than the female. Hence, these latter monkeys probably use their voices as a mutual call ; and this is cer- tainly the case with some quadrupeds, for instance the beaver, f Another gibbon, the //. agilis, is remarkable, from having the power of giving a complete and correct octave of musical notes, J which we may reasonably suspect serves as a sexual charm; but I shall have to recur to this subject in- the next chapter. The vocal organs of the American Mycetes caraya are one-third larger in the male than in the female, and are wonderfully powerful. These monkeys in warm weather make the forests resound at morning and evening with their overwhelming voices. The malen begin the dreadful concert and often continue it during many hours, the females sometimes joining in with their less-powerful voices. An excellent observer Rengger could not perceive that they were excited to begin by any special cause ; he thinks that, like many birds, they delight in their own music, and try to excel each other. Whether most of the foregoing monkeys have acquired their powerful voices in order to beat their rivals and charm the females or whether the vocal organs have been strengthened and enlarged through the inherited effects of long-continued use without any particular good being thus gained I will not pretend to say; but the former view, at least in the case of the Hylobates agilis, seems the most probable. *0wen, " Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 600. f Mr. Green, in " Journal of Linn. Soc.," vol. x, Zoology, r869, p. 862. $C. L. Marun. " General Introduction to the Nat. Hist, of Mamm. Animals," 1841, p. 431. " Naturgeschichte der Sftugethiere von Paraguay," 1830, BB. 10, 31 MAMMALS. 608 I may here mention two very curious sexual peculiarities occurring in seals, because they have been supposed by Borne writers to affect the voice. The nose of the male sea-elephant (Macrorhinus propose ideus) becomes greatly elongated during the breeding-season and can then be erected. In this state it is sometimes a foot in length. The female is not thus provided at any period of fife. The male makes a wild, hoarse, gurgling noise, which is audible at a great distance and is believed to be strength- ened by the proboscis; the voice of the female being differ- ent. Lesson compares the erection of the proboscis with the swelling of the wattles of male gallinaceous birds while courting the females. In another allied kind of seal, the bladder-nose (Cystopliora cristata], the head is covered by a great hood or bladder. This is supported by the septum of the nose, which is produced far backward and rises into an internal crest seven inches in height. The hood is clothed with short hair and is muscular; it can be inflated until it more than equals the whole head in size! The males when rutting fight furiously on the ice, and their roaring " is said to be sometimes so loud as to be heard four miles off." When attacked they likewise roar or bellow; and whenever irritated the bladder is inflated and quivers. Some naturalists believe that the voice is thus strengthened, but various other uses have been assigned to this extraordinary structure. Mr. R. Brown thinks that it serves as a protection against acci- dents of all kinds; but this is not probable, for, as I am assured by Mr. Lamont, who killed six hundred of these animals, the hood is rudimentary in the females and it is not developed in the males during youth.* Odor. With some animals, as with the notorious skunk of America, the overwhelming odor which they emit appears to serve exclusively as a defense. With shrew- mice (Sorex) both sexes possess abdominal scent-glands, ,*0n the sea- elephant, see an article by Lesson, in "Diet. Class. Hist. Nat.," torn, xiii, p. 418. For the Cystophora, or Stemmatopus, see Dr. Dekay "Annals of Lyceum of Nat. Hist. New York," vol. i, 1824, p, 94. Pennant has also collected information from the sealers on this animal. The fullest account is given by Mr. Brown, in " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1868, p. 436. 604 THE DESCENT OF MAN, and there can be little doubt, from the rejection of their bodies by birds and beasts of prey, that the odor is pro- tective; nevertheless, the glands become enlarged in the males during the breeding-season. In many other quad- rupeds the glands are of the same size in both sexes,* but their uses are not known. In other species the glands are confined to the males or are more developed than in the females ; and they almost always become more active during the rutting-season. At this period the glands on the sides of the face of the male elephant enlarge and emit a secretion having a strong musky odor. The males, and rarely the females, of many kinds of bats have glands and protrudable sacks situated in various parts; and it is believed that these are odoriferous. The Tank effluvium of the male goat is well known, and that of certain male deer is wonderfully strong and per- sistent. On the banks of the Plata I perceived the air tainted with the odor of the male Cervus campestris at half a mile to leeward of a herd; and a silk handkerchief, in which I carried home a skin, though often used and washed, retained when first unfolded traces of the odor for one year and seven months. This animal does not emit its strong odor until more than a year old, and if castrated while young never emits it.f Besides the general odor permeating the whole body of certain ruminants (for in- stance, Bos moschaiiis) in the breeding-season, many deer, antelopes, sheep and goats possess odoriferous glands in various situations, more especially on their faces. The so-called tear-sacks, or suborbital pits, come under this head. These glands secrete & semi-fluid fetid matter which is sometimes so copious as to stain the whole face, as I have myself seen in an antelope. They are "usually larger in the male than in the female, and their develop- *As with the castoreum of the beaver, see Mr. L. H. Morgan's most interesting work, "The American Beaver," 1868, p. 300. Pallas (" Spic. Zoolog.," fasc. viii, 1779, p. 23) has well discussed the odoriferous glands of mammals. Owen ("Anat. of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 634) also gives an account of these glands, including those of the elephant, and (p. 763) those of shrew-mice. On bats, Mr. Dobson in "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1873, p. 241. fRengger, " Xaturgeschichte der Saugetmere von Paraguay," 1830, s. 355. This observer also gives some curious particulars ia regard to the odor. MAMMALS. 605 ment is checked by castration."* According to Desmarest, they are altogether absent in the female of Antilope sub- gutturosa. Hence, there can be no doubt that they stand in close relation with the reproductive functions. They are also sometimes present, and sometimes absent, in nearly allied forms. In the adult male musk deer (Mosclius mos- chiferus) a naked space round the tail is bedewed with an odoriferous fluid, while in the adult female, and in the male until two years old, this space is covered with hair and is not odoriferous. The proper musk-sack of this deer is from its position necessarily confined to the male and forms an additional scent-organ. It is a singular fact that the matter secreted by this latter gland does not, according to Pallas, change in consistence or increase in quantity during the rutting - season ; nevertheless, this naturalist admits that its presence is in some way con- nected with the act of reproduction. He gives, however, only a conjectural and unsatisfactory explanation of its use. f In most cases, when only the male emits a strong odor during the breeding-season, it probably serves to excite or allure the female. We must not judge on this head by our own taste, for it is well known that rats are enticed by certain essential oils, and cats by valerian, substances far from agreeable to us; and that dogs, though they will not eat carrion, sniff and roll on it. From the reasons given when discussing the voice of the stag Ave may reject the idea that the odor serves to bring the females from a dis- tance to the males. Active and long-continued use cannot here have come into play, as in the case of the vocal organs. The odor emitted must be of considerable importance to the male, inasmuch as large and complex glands, furnished with muscles for everting the sack and for closing or open- ing the orifice, have in some cases been developed. The development of Jiese organs is intelligible through sexual selection if the most odoriferous males are the most suc- -*0wen; " Anatomy of Vercebrates," vol. iii, p. 632. See also Dr. Murie's observations on these glands in the "Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1870, p. 340. l>osmarest, on the Antilope subgutturosa, "Mammal- ogie," 1820, p. 455. fPhallas, " Spicilegia Zoolog.," fasc. xiii, 1799, p. 24; Desmou line, " Diet. Class. d'Hist. Nat.," torn, iii, p. 586. 606 THE DESCENT OF MAN. cessful in winning the females, and in leaving offspring to inherit their gradually perfected glands and odors. Development of the Hair. We have seen that male quad- rupeds often have the hair on their necks and shoulders much more developed than the females; and many addi- tional instances could be given. This sometimes serves as a defense to the male during his battles; but whether the hair in most cases has been specially developed for this purpose is very doubtful. We may feel almost certain that this is not the case, when only a thin and narrow crest runs along the back ; for a crest of this kind would afford scarcely any protection, and the ridge of the back is not a place likely to be injured; nevertheless such crests are sometimes confined to the males, or are much more devel- oped in them than in the females. Two antelopes, the Tragelaplius scriptus* (see fig. 70, p. 620) and Portax picta may be given as instances. When stags and the males of the wild goat are enraged or terrified these crests stand erect;f but t cannot be supposed that they have been developed merely for the sake of exciting fear in their enemies. One of the above-named antelopes, the Partax picta, has a large, well-defined brush of black hair on the throat, and this is much larger in the male than in the female. In the Ammotragus tragelaphus of N. Africa, a member of the sheep family, the fore legs are almost concealed by an extraordinary growth of hair, which depends from the neck and upper halves of the legs; but Mr. Bartlett does not believe that this mantle is of the least use to the male, in whom it is much more developed than in the female. Male quadrupeds of many kinds differ from the females in having more hair, or hair of a different character, on certain parts of their faces. Thus the bull alone has curled hair on the forehead. J In three closely allied sub-genera of the goat family only the males possess beards, sometimes of large size; in two other sub-genera both sexes have a * Dr. Gray, " Gleanings from the Menagerie at Knowsley," pi. 28. f Judge Caton on tlie Wapiti, "Transact. Ottawa Acad. Nat. Sciences," 1868, pp. 36, 40; Blytli, "Land and Water," on Capra cegagrus, 1867, p. 37. J " Hunter's Essays and Observations," edited by Owen, 1861, vL i, p. 236. MAMMALS. 607 beard, but it disappears in some of the domestic breeds of the common goat; and neither sex of the Hemitragus has a beard. In the ibex the beard is not developed during the cummer, and it is so small at other times that it may be called rudimentary.* With some monkeys the beard is confined to the male, as in the orang; or is much larger in Fig. 68. Pithecia satanas, male (from Brehm). the male than in the female, as in the Mycetes caraya and Pithecia satanas (fig. 68). So it is with the whiskers of some species of Macaous,f and, as we have seen, with the manes of some species of baboons. But with most kinds of , monkeys the various tufts of hair about the face and head are alike in both sexes. *See Dr. Gray's "Cat. of Mammalia in British Museum," part iii, 1852, p. 144. f Rengger, " Saugethiere," etc., s. 14; Desinarest. "Mammal ogie," p. 86. tfOS THE DESCENT OF MAN. The males of various members of the ox family (Bovidas), and of certain antelopes, are furnished with a dewlap or great fold of skin on the neck, which is much less devel- oped in the female. "Now, what must we conclude with respect to such sexual differences as these? No one will pretend that the beards of certain male goats, or the dewlap of the bull, or the crests of hair along the backs of certain male antelopes, are of any use to them in their ordinary habits. It is pos- sible that the immense beard of the male Pithecia, and the large beard of the male orang, may protect their throats when fighting ; for the keepers in the Zoological Gardens inform me that many monkeys attack each other by the throat; but it is not probable that the beard has been developed for a distinct purpose from that served by the whiskers, mustache and other tufts of hair on the face; and no one will suppose that these are useful as a protec- tion. Must we attribute all these appendages of hair or skin to mere purposeless variability in the male? It cannot be denied that this is possible; for in many domesticated quadrupeds certain characters, apparently not derived through reversion from any wild parent form, are confined to the males, or are more developed in them than in females; for instance, the hump on the male zebu-cattle of India, the tail of fat-tailed rams, the arched outline of the forehead in the males of several breeds of sheep, and, lastly, the mane, the long hairs on the hind legs, and the dewlap of the male of the Berbura goat.* The mane, which occurs only in the rams of an African breed of sheep, is a true secondary sexual character, for, as I hear from Mr. Winwood Reade, it is not developed if the animal be castrated. Although we ought to be extremely cautious, as shown in my work on " Variation under Domestication," in concluding that any character, even with animals kept by semi-civilized people, has not been subjected to selec- tion by man, and thus augmented, yet in the cases just specified this is improbablo; more especially as the charac- ters are confined to the males, or are more strongly devel- oped in them than in the females. If it were positively * See the chapters on these several animals in vol. i, of my " Variation of Animals under Domestication;" also vol. ii, p. 73; also chap, xx, on the practice of selection by semi-civilized people. For the Berbura goat, see Dr. Gray, " Catalogue," ibid, p. 157. MAMMALS. 609 known that the above African ram is a descendant of the same primitive stock as the other breeds of sheep, and if the Berbura male goat, with his mane, dewlap, etc., is descended from the same stock as other goats, then, assuming that selection has not been applied to these characters, they must be due to simple variability, together with sexually limited inheritance. Hence it appears reasonable to extend this same view to all analagous cases with animals in a state of nature. Nevertheless I cannot persuade myself that it generally holds good, as in the case of the extraordinary development of hair on the throat and fore legs of the male Ammo- tragus, or in that of the immense beard of the male Pithecia. Such study as I have been able to give to nature makes me believe that parts or organs which are highly developed were acquired at some period for a special pur- pose. With those antelopes in which the adult male is more strongly colored than the female, and with those monkeys on which the hair on the face is elegantly arranged and colored in a diversfied manner, it seems probable that the crests and tufts of hair were gained as ornaments; and this I know is the opinion of some naturalists. If this be correct, there can be little doubt that they were gained or at least modified through sexual selection ; but how far the same view may be extended to other mammals is doubtful. Color of the Hair and of the Naked Skin. I will first give briefly all the cases known to me of male quadrupeds differing in color from the females. "With marsupials, as I am informed by Mr. Gould, the sexes rarely differ in this respect; but the great red kangaroo offers a striking excep- tion, " delicate blue being the prevailing tint in those parts of the female which in the male are red/'* In the Didelphis opossum of Cayenne the female is said to be a little more red than the male. Of the rodents, Dr. Gray remarks: " African squirrels, especially those found in the tropical regions, have the fur much brighter and more vivid at some seasons of the year than at others, and the fur of *0sphranter rufus, Gould, "Mammals of Australia," 1863, vol. li. On the Didelphis, Desmarest, " Mammalogie," p. 256. 1 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the male is generally brighter than that of the female."* Dr. Gray informs me that he specified the African squir- rels, because, from their unusually bright colors, they best exhibit this difference. The female of the Mus minutus of Russia is of a paler and dirtier tint than the male. In a large number of bats the fur of the male is lighter than in female, f Mr. Dobson also remarks, with respect to these animals: " Differences, depending partly or entirely on the possession by the male of fur of a much more brilliant hue, or distinguished by different markings or by the greater length of certain portions, are met only, to any appreciable extent, in the frugivorous bats in which the sense of sight is well developed." This last remark deserves attention, as bearing on the question whether bright colors are ser- viceable to male animals from being ornamental. In one genus of sloths it is now established, as Dr. Gray states, " that the males are ornamented differently from the females that is to say, that they have a patch of soft short hair between the shoulders, which is generally of a more or less orange color, and in one species pure white. The females, on the contrary, are destitute of this mark." The terrestrial Carnivora and Insectivora rarely exhibit sexual differences of any kind, including color. The ocelot (Felis pardalis), however, is exceptional, for the colors of the female, compared with those of the male, are " moins apparentes, le fauve, etant plus terne, le blanc moins pur, les raies ayant moins de largeur et les taches moins de ' diam^tre."J The sexes of the allied Felis mitis also differ, but in a less degree; the general hues of the female being rather paler than in the male, with the spots less black. The marine Carnivora or seals, on the other hand, some- times differ considerably in color, and they present, as we have already seen, other remarkable sexual differences. Thus the male of the Of aria nigrescens of the southern hemisphere is of a rich brown shade above ; while the *" Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," Nov., 1867, p. 325. On the Mus minutus, Desraarest, " Mammalogie," p. 304. f J. A. Allen, in "Bulletin of Mus. Comp. Zoolog. of Cambridge, United States," 1869, p. 207. Mr. Dobson on sexual characters in the Chiroptera, " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1873, p. 241. Dr. Gray on sloths, ibid, 1871, p. 436. t Desmarest, " Mamraalogie," 1820, p. 220. On Fettt Mitit, Beng- ger, ibid, s. 184. MAMMALS. 611 female, who acquires her adult tints earlier in life than the male, is dark-gray above, the young of both sexes being of a deep chocolate color. The male of the northern Plioca groenlandica is tawny gray, with a curious saddle-shaped dark mark on the back; the female is much smaller and has a very different appearance, being " dull white or yel- lowish straw-color, with a tawny hue on the back;" the young at first are pure white, and can " hardly be dis- tinguished among the icy hummocks and snow, their coloi thus acting as a protection."* With ruminants sexual differences of color occur more commonly than in any other order. A difference of this kind is general in the Strepsicerene antelopes; thus the male nilghau (Portax picta) is bluish-grey and much darker than the female, with the square white patch on the throat, the white marks on the fetlocks and the black spots on the ears all much more distinct. We have seen that in this species the crests and tufts of hair are likewise more devel- oped in the male than in the hornless female. I am informed by Mr. Blyth that the male, without shedding his hair, periodically becomes darker during the breeding- season. Youug males cannot be distinguished from young females until about twelve months old; and if the male is emasculated before this period, he never, according to the same authority, changes color. The importance of this latter fact, as evidence that the coloring of the Portax is of sexual origin, becomes obvious when we hearf that neither the red summer coat nor the blue winter coat of the Virginian deer is at all affected by emasculation. With most or all of the highly ornamented species of Tregelaphus the males are darker than the hornless females, and their crests of hair are more fully developed. In the male of that magnificent ante- lope, the Derbyan eland, the body is redder, the whole neck much blacker and the white band which separates these colors broader than in the female. In the Cape eland, also, the male is slightly darker than the female. J *Dr. Mnrie on the Otaria, " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1869, p. 108. Mr. R.' Brown on the P. groenlandica, ibid, 1868, p. 417. See also on the colors of seals, Desmarest, ibid, pp. 243, 249. f Judge Catpn, in "Trans. Ottawa Acad. of Nat. Sciences," 1868, p. 4. JDr. Gray, "Cat. of Mamm. in Brit. Mus.," part iii, 1852, pp. J34-143, also Di. Gray, "Gleaniuers *roin tlie Menagerie of Kuowi- 612 THE DESCENT OF MAN. In the Indian black -buck (A. lezoartica), which belongs to another tribe of antelopes, the male is very dark, almost black ; while the hornless female is fawn- colored. We meet in this species, as Mr. Blyth informs me, with an exactly similar series of facts, as in the Portax picta, namely, in the male periodically changing color during the breeding-season, in the effects of emascu- lation on this change, and in the young of both sexes being indistinguishable from each other. In the Antilope niger the male is black, the female, as well as the young of both sexes, being brown; in A. sing-sing the male is much brighter-colored than the hornless female, and his chest and belly are blacker; in the male A. caama the marks and lines which occur on various parts of the body are black, instead of brown as in the female; in the brindled gnu (A. gorgon) " the colors of the male are nearly the same as those of the female, only deeper and of a brighter hue." * Other analogous cases could be added. The Banteng bull (Bos sondaicus] of the Malayan Archi- pelago is almost black, with white legs and buttocks; the cow is of a bright dun, as are the young males until about the age of three years, when they rapidly change color. The emasculated bull reverts to the color of the female. The female Kemas goat is paler, and both it and the female Capra cegagrus are said to be more uniformly tinted than their males. Deer rarely present any sexual differences in color. Judge Caton, however, informs me ohat in the males of the wapiti deer (Cervus canadensis] the neck, belly and legs are much darker than in the female; but during the winter the darker tints gradually fade away and disappear. I may here mention that Judge Caton has in his park three races of the Virginian deer which differ slightly in color, but the differences are almost exclusively confined to the blue winter or breeding coat; so that this case may be corn- ley," in which there is a splendid drawing of the Oreas derbianus: see the text on Tragelaphus. For the Cape eland (Oreas canna), see Andrew Smith, " Zoology of S. Africa," pi. 41, 42. There are also many of these antelopes in the Zoological Gardens. *On the Ant. niger, see "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1850, p. 133. With respect to an allied species, in which there is an equal sexual differ- ence in color, see Sir S. Baker, " The Albert Nyanza," 1866, vol. ii, p. 627. For the A. sing -sing, Gray, " Cat. B. Mus.," p. 100. Des- marest, "Mammalogie," p. 468, on the A. caama, Andrew Smith, " Zoology of S. Africa," on the gnu. MAMMALS. 613 pared with those given in a previons chapter of closely allied or representative species of birds which differ from each other only in their breeding plumage.* The females of Cervus paludosus of South America, as well as the young of both sexes, do not possess the black stripes on the nose and the blackish-brown line on the breast which are characteristic of the adult males, f Lastly, as I am informed by Mr. Blyth, the mature male of the beautifully colored and spotted axis deer is considerably darker than the female ; and this hue the castrated male never acquires. The last order which we need consider is that of the Primates. The male of the Lemur macaco is generally coal-black, while the female is brown. J Of the Quadru- mana of the New World, the females and young of Mycetes caraya are grayish-yellow and like each other; in the second year the young male becomes reddish-brown; in the third, black, excepting the stomach, which, however, becomes quite black in the fourth or fifth year. There is also a strongly marked difference in color between the sexes of Mycetes seniculus and Cebus capucinus; the young of the former, and I believe of the latter species, resembling the females. With Pithccia leucocepliala the young likewise resemble the females, which are brownish-black above and light rusty-red beneath, the adult males being black. The ruff of hair round the face of Ateles marginatus is tinted yellow in the male and white in the female. Turning to the Old World, the males of Hylobates hoolock are always black, with the exception of a white band over the brows; the females vary from whity-brown to a dark tint mixed with black, but are never wholly black. In the beautiful * "Ottawa Academy of Sciences," May 21, 1868, pp. 3, 5. fS. Mailer, on the Banteng, "Zool. Indischen Archipel.," 1839- 1844, tab. 35; see also Raffles, as quoted by Mr. Blyth, in " Land and Water," 1867, p. 476. On goats, Dr. Gray, " Cat. Brit. Mus.," p. 146; Desmarest, " Mammalogie," p. 482. On the Cervus palu- dosus, Rengger, ibid, B. 345. 'JSclater, "Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1866, p. 1. The same fact has also been fully ascertained by MM. Pollen and van Dam. See, also, Dr. Gray in " Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.," May, 1871, p. 340. 0n Mycetes, Rengger, ibid, s. 14; and Brehm, " Illustrirtes Thierleben," B. i, ss. 96, 107. On Ateles Desmarest, "Mammal- ogie," p. 75. On Kylobates, Blyth, "Land and Water," 1867, p. 135. On the Semnopithecus, S. Miiller, " Zoog. Indischen Archi- pel.," tab. x. 614 THE DESCENT OF MAN, Cercopithecus diana, the head of the adult male is of an intense black, while that of the female is dark gray; in the former the fur between the thighs is of an elegant fawn- color, in the latter it is paler. In the beautiful and curious mustache monkey ( Cercopithecus cephus) the only differ- ence between the sexes is that the tail of the male is chestnut and that of the female gray; but Mr. Bartlett informs me that all the hues become more pronounced in the male when adult, while in the female they remain as they were during youth. According to the colored figures given by Solomon Miiller, the male of Semnopithecus cJirysomelas is nearly black, the female being pale brown. In the Cercopithecus cynosurus and griseoviridis one part of the body, which is confined to the male sex, is of the most brilliant blue or green, and contrasts strikingly with the naked skin on the hinder part of the body, which is vivid red. Lastly, in the baboon family, the adult male of Cyno- cephalus hamadryas differs from the female not only by his immense mane, but slightly in the color of the hair and of the naked callosities. In the drill (C. leucophceus) the females and young are much paler colored, with less green than the adult males. No other member in the whole class of mammals is colored in so extraordinary a manner as the adult male mandrill (C. mormon}. The face at this age becomes of a fine blue, with the ridge and tip of the nose of the most brilliant red. According to some authors the face is also marked with whitish stripes, and is shaded in parts with black, but the colors appear to be variable. On the forehead there is a crest of hair, and on the chin a yellow beard. " Toutes les parties superieures de leurs cuisses et le grand espace nu de leurs fesses sont egalement colores du rouge le plus vif, avec un melange de bleu qui ne manque reellement pas d'elegance."* When the animal is excited all the naked parts become much more vividly tinted. Several authors have used the strongest expres- sions in describing these resplendent colors, which they com- pare with those of the most brilliant birds. Another remark- *Gervais, "Hist. Nat. des Mammiferes," 1854, p. 103. Figures are given of the skull of the male. Also Desmarest, " Mammal- ~- ! - " p. 70. Geoffrey St.-Hilaire and F. Cuvier. "Hist. Nat. des 184, torn. i. MAMMALS. 615 able peculiarity is that when the great canine teeth are fully developed, immense protuberances of bone are formed on each cheek, which are deeply furrowed longitudinally, and the naked skin over them is brilliantly colored, as just described. (Fig. 69.) In the adult females and in the young of both sexes these protuberances are scarcely per- Fig. 69 Head of male Mandrill (from Gervais, " Hist. Nat. des Mammifcres "). ceptible; and the naked parts are much less bright colored, the face being almost black, tinged with blue. In the adult female, however, the nose at certain regular intervals of time becomes tinted with red. In all the cases hitherto given the male is more strongly or brighter colored than the female, and differs from the 616 THE DESCENT OF MAN. young of both sexes. But as with some few birds it is the female which is brighter colored than the male, so with the Rhesus monkey (Macacns rliestis), the female has a large surface of naked skin round the tail, of a brilliant carmine red, which, as I was assured by the keepers in the Zoological Gardens, periodically becomes even yet more vivid, and her face also is pale red. On the other hand, in the adult male and in the young of both sexes (as I saw in the gardens), neither the naked skin at the posterior end of the body, nor the face, show a trace of red. It appears, however, from some published accounts, that the male does occasionally, or during certain seasons, exhibit some traces of the red. Although he is thus less ornamented than the female, yet in the larger size of his body, larger canine teeth, more developed whiskers, more prominent super- ciliary ridges, he follows the common rule of the male ex- celling the female. I have now given all the cases known to me of a dif- ference in color between the sexes of mammals. Some of these may be the result of variations confined to one sex and transmitted to the same sex, without any good being gained, and therefore without the aid of selection. We have instances of this with our domesticated animals, as in the males of certain cats being rusty-red, while the females are tortoise-shell colored. Analogous cases occur in nature: Mr. Bartlett has seen many black varieties of the jaguar, leopard, vulpine phalanger and wombat; and he is certain that all, or nearly all these animals, were males. On the other hand, with wolves, foxes, and apparently American squirrels, both sexes are occasionally born black. Hence it is quite possible that with some mammals a difference of color between the sexes, especially when this is congenital, may simply be the result, without the aid of selection, of the occurrence of one or more variations, which from the first were sexually limited in their transmission. Never- theless it is improbable that the diversified, vivid, and con- trasted colors of certain quadrupeds, for instance, of the above monkeys and antelopes, can thus be accounted for. We should bear in mind that these colors do not appear in the male at birth, but only at or near maturity; and that, unlike ordinary variations, they are lost if the male be emasculated. It is on the whole probable that the strongly MAMMALS. 617 marked colors and other ornamental characters of male quadrupeds are beneficial to them in their rivalry with other males, and have consequently been acquired through sexual selection. This view is strengthened by the dif- ferences in color between the sexes occurring almost ex- clusively, as may be collected from the previous details, in those groups and sub-groups of mammals which present other and strongly marked secondary sexual characters; these being likewise due to sexual selection. Quadrupeds manifestly take notice of color. Sir S. Baker repeatedly observed that the African elephant and rhinoceros attacked white or gray horses with special fury. I have elsewhere shown* that half-wild horses apparently prefer to pair with those of the same color, and that herds of fallow-deer of different colors, though living together, have long kept distinct. It is a more significant fact that a female zebra would not admit the addresses of a male ass until he was painted so as to resemble a zebra, and then, as John Hunter remarks, "she received him very readily. In this curious fact, we have instinct excited by mere color, which had so strong an effect as to get the better of everything else. But the male did not require this; the female being an animal somewhat similar to himself, was sufficient to rouse him." f In an earlier chapter we have seen that the mental powers of the higher animals do not differ in kind, though greatly in degree, from the corresponding powers of man, especially of the lower and barbarous races; and it would appear that even their taste fort the beautiful is not widely different from that of the Quadrumana. As the negro of Africa raises the flesh on his face into parallel ridges " or cicatrices, high above the natural surface, which unsightly deformities are considered great personal attractions;"! as negroes and savages in many parts of the world paint their faces with red, blue, white or black bars so the male man- drill of Africa appears to have acquired his deeply furrowed and gaudily colored face from having been thus rendered *"The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication." 1868, vol. ii, pp. 102, 103. J" Essays and Observations by J. Hunter," edited by Owen, 1861, . i, p. 194. J Sir S. Baker, "The Nile Tributaries of Abyssinia," 1867. 618 THE DESCENT OF MAN. attractive to the female. No doubt it is to ug a most grotesque notion that the posterior end of the body should be colored for the sake of ornament even more brilliantly than the face; but this is not more strange than that the tails of many birds should be especially decorated. With mammals we do not at present possess any evidence that the males take pains to display their charms before the female; and the elaborate manner in which this is per- formed by male birds and other animals is the strongest argument in favor of the belief that the females admire, or are excited by, the ornaments and colors displayed before them. There is, however, a striking parallelism between mammals and birds in all their secondary sexual characters, namely, in their weapons for fighting with rival males, in their ornamental appendages and in their colors. In both classes, when the male differs from the female, the young of both sexes almost always resemble each other, and in a large majority of cases resemble the adult female. In both classes the male assumes the characters proper to his sex shortly before the age of reproduction; and if emas- culated at an early period loses them. In both classes the change of color is sometimes seasonal, and the tints of the naked parts sometimes become more vivid during the act of courtship. In both classes the male is almost always more vividly or strongly colored than the female, and is orna- mented with larger crests of hair or feathers, or other such appendages. In a few exceptional cases the female in both classes is more highly ornamented than the male. With many mammals, and at least in the case of one bird, the male is more odoriferous than the female. In both classes the voice of the male is more powerful than that of the female. Considering this parallelism, there can be little doubt that the same cause, whatever it may be, has acted on mammals and birds; and the result, as far as ornamental characters are concerned, may be attributed, as it appears to me, 'to the long-continued preference of the individuals of one sex for certain individuals of the opposite sex, combined with their success in leaving a larger number of offspring to inherit their superior attractions. Equal Transmission of Ornamental Characters to Both Sexes. With many birds, ornaments, which analogy leads us to believe were primarily acquired by the males, have MAMMALS. 619- been transmitted equally, or almost equally, to both sexes; and we may now inquire how far this view applies to mam- mals. With a considerable number of species, especially of the smaller kinds, both sexes have been colored, inde- pendently of sexual selection, for the sake of protection; but not, as far as I can judge, in so many cases, nor in so striking a manner, as in most of the lower classes. Audu- 'bon remarks that he often mistook the muskrat,* while sitting on the banks of a muddy stream, for a clod of earth, so complete was the resemblance. The hair on her form is a familiar instance of concealment through color; yet this principle partly fails in a closely allied species, the rabbit, for when running to its burrow, it is made conspicuous to the sportsman, and, no doubt, to all beasts of prey, by its upturned white tail. No one doubts that the quadrupeds inhabiting snow-clad regions have been rendered white to protect them from their enemies, or to favor their stealing on their prey. In regions where snow never lies for long, a white coat would be injurious; consequently, species of this color are extremely rare in the hotter parts of the world. It deserves notice that many quadrupeds inhabit- ing moderately cold regions, although they do not assume a white winter dress, become paler during this season; and this apparently is the direct result of the conditions to which they have long been exposed. Pallas f states that in Siberia a change of this nature occurs with the wolf, two species of Mustela, the domestic horse, the Equus hemionus, the domestic cow, two species of antelopes, the musk-deer, the roe, elk and reindeer. The roe, for instance, has a red summer and a grayish- white winter coat; and the latter may, perhaps, serve as a protection to the animal while wandering through the leafless thickets, sprinkled with snow and hoar-frost. If the above-named animals were gradually to extend their range into regions perpetually covered with snow their pale winter coats would probably be rendered, through natural selection, whiter and whiter, until they became as white as snow. .Mr. Reeks has given me a curious instance of an animal * Fiber zibethicus, Audubon and Bachman, "The Quadrupeds of North America," 1846, p. 109. j- " Novae species Quadrupedum e Glirium ordine," 1778, p. 7. What I have called the roe is the Capreelus sibiricus svbecaudatus of Pallas. 620 THE DESCENT OF MAN. profiting by being peculiarly colored. He raised from fifty to sixty white and brown piebald rabbits in a large walled orchard; and he had at the same time some similarly colored cats in his house. Such cats, as I have often noticed, are very conspicuous during the day; but, as they Pig. 70. Tragelaphus scrlptus, maie (from the Knowsley Meriagerie). used to lie in watch during the dusk at the mouths of the burrows, the rabbits apparently did not distinguish them from their party-colored brethren. The result was that, within eighteen months, every one of these party-colored rabbits was destroyed; and there was evidence that this was effected by the cats. Color seems to be advantageous to another animal, the skunk, in a manner of which we have had many instances in other classes. No animal will voluntarily attack one of these creatures on account of the dreadful odor which it emits when irritated; but during the MAMMALS. 621 dttSK it would not easily be recognized and might be attacked by a beast of prey. Hence it is, as Mr. Belt believes, * that the skunk is provided with a great white bushy tail, which serves as a conspicuous warning. Although we must admit that many quadrupeds have received their present tints either as a protection, or as an aid in procuring prey, yet with a host of species, the colors are far too conspicuous and too singularly arranged to allow us to suppose that they serve for these purposes. We may take as an illustration certain antelopes; when we see the square white patch on the throat, the white marks on the fetlocks, and the round black spots on the ears, all more distinct in the male of the Portax picta, than in the female when we see that the colors are more vivid, that the narrow white lines on the flank and the broad white bar on the shoulder are more distinct in the male Oreas derby anus than in the female when we see a similar difference between the sexes of the curiously ornamented Tragelaplius scriptus (fig. 70) we cannot believe that differences of this kind are of any service to either sex in their daily habits of life. It seems a much more probable conclusion that the various marks were first acquired by the males and their colors intensified through sexual selec- tion, and then partially transferred to the females. If this view be admitted, there can be little doubt that the equally singular colors and marks of many other antelopes, though common to both sexes, have been gained and transmitted in a like manner. Both sexes, for instance, of the koodoo (Strepsiceros kudu) (fig. 64) have narrow white vertical lines on their hind flanks, and an elegant angular white mark on their foreheads. Both sexes in the genus Dam- alis are very oddly colored; in D. pygarga the back and neck are purplish-red, shading on the flanks into black ; and these colors are abruptly separated from the white belly and from a large white space on the buttocks; the head is still more oddly colored, a large oblong white mask, nar- rowly edged with black, covers the face up to the eyes (fig. 71}; there are three white stripes on the forehead and the ears are marked with white. The fawns of this species are of a uniform pale yellowish brown. In Damalis albi- frons the coloring of the head differs from that in the last * " The Naturalist in Nicaragua," p. 249. THE DESCENT OF MAN. species in a single white stripe replacing the three stripes, and in the ears being almost wholly white.* After having studied to the best of my ability the sexual differences of animals belonging to all classes,! cannot avoid the conclusion that the curiously arranged colors of many antelopes, though Pig. 71. Damalis pygarga, male (from the Knowsley Menagerie). common to both sexes, are the result of sexual selection primarily applied to the male. The same conclusion may perhaps be extended to the tiger, one of the most beautiful animals in the world, the sexes of which cannot be distinguished by color, even by the dealers in wild beasts. Mr. Wallace believesf that the striped coat of the tiger " so assimilates with the vertical * See the fine plates in A. Smith's "Zoology of S. Africa," and Dr- Gray's " Gleanings from the Menagerie of Knowsley." f "Westminster Review." July I, 1967, p. 0. MAMMALS. 623 stems of the bamboo as to assist greatly in concealing him from his approaching prey." But this view does not appear to me satisfactory. We have some slight evidence that his beauty may be due to sexual selection, for in two species of Felis the analagous marks and colors are rather brighter in the male than in the female. The zebra is con- spicuously striped, and stripes cannot afford any protection on the open plains of S. Africa. Burchell * in describing a herd says: " Their sleek ribs glistened in the sun, and the brightness and regularity of their striped coats presented a picture of extraordinary beauty, in which probably they are not surpassed ty any other quadruped." But as through- out the whole group of the Equidse the sexes are identical in color we have here no evidence of sexual selection. Nevertheless he who attributes the white and dark vertical stripes on the flanks of various antelopes to this process, will probably extend the same view to the royal tiger and beautiful zebra. We have seen in a former chapter that when young ani- mals belonging to any class follow nearly the same habits of life as their parents, and yet are colored in a different manner, it may be inferred that they have retained the coloring of some ancient and extinct progenitor. In the family of pigs, and in the tapirs, the young are marked with longitudinal stripes, and thus differ from all the exist- ing adult species in these two groups. With many kinds of deer the young are marked with elegant white spots, of which their parents exhibit not a trace. A graduated series can be followed from the axis deer, both sexes of which at all ages and during all seasons are beautifully spotted (the male being rather more strongly colored than the female), to species in which neither the old nor the young are spotted. I will specify some of the stepson this series. The Mantchurian deer (Cervus mantcJiuricus) is spotted during the whole year, but, as I have seen in the Zoological Gardens, the spots are much plainer during the summer, when the general color of the" coat is lighter than during the winter, when the general color is darker and the horns are fully developed. In the hog-deer (Hyelaphus porcinus) the spots are extremely conspicuous during the summer when the coat is reddish-brown, but quite disap- * " Travels in South Africa," 1824, vol. ii, p. 315. 624 THE DESCENT OF MAN. pear during the winter when the coat is brown.* In both these species the young are spotted. In the Virginian deer the young are likewise spotted, and about five per cent of the adult animals living in Judge Caton's park, as I am informed by him,, temporarily exhibit at the period when the red summer coat is being replaced by the bluish winter coat, a row of spots on each flank, which are always the same in number, though very variable in distinctness. From this condition there is but a very small step to the complete absence of spots in the adults at all seasons; and, lastly, to their absence at all ages and seasons, as occurs with certain species. From the existence of this perfect series, and more especially from the fawns of so many species being spotted, we may conclude that the now living members of the deer family are the descendants of some ancient species which, like the axis deer, was spotted at all ages and seasons. A still more ancient progenitor probably somewhat resembled the Hyomosclms aquaticus for this animal is spotted, and the hornless males have large exserted canine teeth, of which some few true deer still retain rudiments. Hyomoschus, also, offers one of those interesting cases of a form linking together two groups, for it is intermediate in certain osteological characters between the pachyderms and ruminants, which were formerly thought to be quite distinct, f A curious difficulty here arises. If we admit that colored spots and stripes were first acquired as ornaments, how conies it that so many existing deer, the descendants of an aboriginally spotted animal, and all the species of pigs and tapirs, the descendants of an aboriginally striped animal, have lost in their adult state their former ornaments ? I cannot satisfactorily answer this question. We may feel almost sure that the spots and stripes disap- peared at or near maturity in the progenitors of our exist- ing species, so that they were still retained by the young; and, owing to the law of inheritance at corresponding ages, were transmitted to the young of all succeeding generations. *Dr. Gray, "Gleanings from the Menagerie of Knowsley," p. 64. Mr. Blytli. in speaking (" Land and Water," 1869, p. 42) of the bog- deer of Ceylon, says it is more brightly spotted with white than the common hog-deer, at the season when it renews its horns. f Falconer and Cautley, " Proc. Geolog. Soc.,"1843: and Falconer's 'Pal. Memoirs," vol. i, p. 196, MAMMALS. 625 It may have been a great advantage to the lion and puma, from the open nature of their usual haunts, to have lost their stripes, and to have been thus rendered less con- spicuous to their prey; and if the successive variations, by which this end was gained, occurred rather late in life the young would have retained their stripes, as is now the case. Fig. 72. Head of Semnopithecus rubicundus. This and the following figures (from Prof. Gervais) are given to show the odd arrangement and develop- ment of the hair on the head. As to deer, pigs and tapirs, Fritz Miiller has suggested to me that these animals, by the removal of their spots or stripes through natural selection, would have been less easily seen by their enemies; and that they would have especially required this protection as soon as the carnivora increased in size and number during the tertiary periods. This may be the true explanation, but it is rather strange that the young should not have been thus protected, and still more so that the adults of some species should have 626 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. retained their spots, either partially or completely, during part of the year. We know that when the domestic ass varies and becomes reddish-brown, gray or black the stripes on the shoulders and even on the spine frequently disap- pear, though we cannot explain the cause. Very few horses, except dun-colored kinds, have stripes on any part of their bodies, yet we have good reason to believe that the aboriginal horse was striped on the legs and spine, and probably on the shoulders.* Hence the disappearance of the spots and stripes in our adult existing deer, pigs and tapirs may be due to a change in the general color of their coats; but whether this change was effected through sexual or natural selection, or was due to the direct action of the conditions of life, or to some other unknown carse, it is impossible to decide. An observation made by Mr. idolater well illustrates our ignorance of the laws which regulate the appearance and disappearance of stripes; the species of Asinus which inhabit the Asiatic continent are destitute of stripes, not having even the cross shoulder-stripe, while those which inhabit Africa are conspicuously striped, with the partial exception of A. tceniopus, which has only the cross shoulder-stripe and generally some faint bars on the legs; and this species inhabits the almost intermediate region of Upper Egypt and Abyssinia, f Quadrumana. Before we conclude, it will be well to add a few remarks on the ornaments of monkeys. In most of the species the sexes resemble each other in color, but in some, as we have seen, the males differ from the females, especially in the color of the naked parts of the skin, in the development of the beard, whiskers and mane. Many species are colored either in so extraordinary or so beautiful a manner, and are furnished with such curious and elegant crests of hair, that we can hardly avoid looking at these characters as having been gained for the sake of ornament. The accompanying figures (72 to 7G) serve to show the arrangement of the hair on the face and head in sev- eral species. It is scarcely conceivable that these crests of *"The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," 1868, vol. i, pp. 61-64. f " Proc. Zool. Soc.," 1862, p. 164 See. also, Dr. Hartmau, " Ann. d. Landw.," Bd. xliii, s. 32ft. MAMMALS. 62? hair and the strongly contrasted colors of the fur and skin, can be the result of mere variability without the aid of se- lection; and it is inconceivable that they can be of use in any ordinary way to these animals. If so, they have probably been gained through sexual selection, though transmitted equally, or almost equally, to both sexes. Pig. 78. Head of Semnopithecus comatus. Fig. 74. Head of Cebus capucinua Fig. 75. Head of Ateles marginatus. Fig. 76. Head of Cebus vellerosus. With many of the Quadrumana, we have additional evi- dence of the action of sexual selection in the greater size and strength of the males, and in the greater development of their canine teeth, in comparison with the females. A few instances will suffice of the strange manner in which both sexes of some species are colored and of the beauty of others. The face of the Cercopithecus petaurista 628 THE DESCENT OF MAN. (fig. 77) is black, the whiskers and beard being white, with Fig. 77. Cercopithecus petaurista (from Brehm). a defined, round, white spot on the nose, covered with short white hair, which gives to the animal an almost MAMMALS. 029 ludicrous aspect. The Semnopithecus frontatus likewise has a blackish face with a long black beard, and a large naked spot on the forehead of a bluish-white color. The face of Macacus lasiotus is dirty flesh-colored, with a denned red spot on each cheek. The appearance of Cercocebus cethiops is grotesque, with its black face, white whiskers and collar, chestnut head, and a large naked white spot over each eyelid. In very many species the beard, whiskers and crests of hair round the face are of a different color from the rest of the head, and, when differ- ent, are always of a lighter tint,* being often pure white, sometimes bright yellow or reddish. The whole face of the South American Brachyurus calvus is of a " glowing scarlet hue;'' but this color does not appear until the ani- mal is nearly mature, f The naked skin of the face differs wonderfully in color in the various species. It is often brown or flesh-color, with parts perfectly white, and often as black as that of the most sooty negro. In the Brachyu- rus the scarlet tint is brighter than that of the most blush- ing Caucasian damsel. It is sometimes more distinctly orange than in any Mongolian, and in several species it is blue, passing into violet or gray. In all the species known to Mr. Bartlett, in which the adults of both sexes have strongly colored faces, the colors are dull or absent during early youth. This likewise holds good with the mandril and rhesus, in which the face and the posterior parts of the body are brilliantly colored in one sex alone. In these latter cases we have reason to believe that the colors were acquired through sexual selection; and we are naturally Jed to extend the same view to the foregoing species, though both sexes when adult have their faces colored in the same manner. Although many kinds of monkeys are far from beautiful according to our taste, other species are universally ad- mired for their elegant appearance and bright colors. The Semnopithecus nemceus, though peculiarly colored, is de- scribed as extremely pretty; the orange-tinted face is sur- rounded by long whiskers of glossy whiteness, with a line of * I observed this fact in the Zoological Gardens; and many case* may be seen in the colored plates in Geoffroy St.-Hilaire and F- Cuvier, "Hist. Nat. des Mammif eres, " torn, i, 1824. f Bates, "The Naturalist on the Amazons," 1868, vol. ii, p. 310. 630 THE DESCENT OF MAN. chestnut-red over the eyebrows; the fur on the back is of a delicate gray, with a square patch on the loins, the tail and the fore arms being of a pure white; a gorget of chest- nut surmounts the chest; the thighs are black, with the legs chestnut-red. I will mention only two other monkeys for their beauty; and I have selected these as presenting slight sexual differences in color, which renders it in some degree probable that both sexes owe their elegant appear- ance to sexual selection. In the mustache-monkey (Cercopithecus cephus) the general color of the fur is mot- tled-greenish with the throat white; in the male the end of the tail is chestnut, but the face is the most ornamented part, the skin being chiefly bluish-gray, shading into a blackish tint beneath the eyes, with the upper lip of a deli- cate blue, clothed on the lower edge with a thin black mustache ; the whiskers are orange-colored, with the upper part black, forming a band which extends back- ward to the ears, the latter being clothed with whitish hairs. In the Zoological Society's Gardens I have often overheard visitors admiring the beauty of another monkey, deservedly called Cercopithecus diana (fig. 78); the general color of the fur is gray; the chest and inner surface of the fore legs are white; a large triangular defined space on the hinder part of the back is rich chestnut; in the male the inner sides of the thighs and the abdomen are delicate fawn-colored, and the top of the head is black; the face and ears are intensely black, contrasting finely with a white transverse crest over the eyebrows and a long white peaked beard, of which the basal portion is black.* In these and many other monkeys the beauty and sin- gular arrangement of their colors, and still more the diver- sified and elegant arrangement of the crests and tufts of hair on their heads, force the conviction on my mind that these characters have been acquired through sexual selection exclusively as ornaments. Summary. The law of battle for the possession of the female appears to prevail throughout the whole great class of mammals. Most naturalists will admit that the greater * I have seen most of the above monkeys in the Zoological Society's Gardens. The description of the Semnopithecus nemaus ia taken from Mr. W. C. Martin's "Nat. Hist, of Mammalia," 1841, p. 460; Bee also pp. 475, 528. MAMMALS. 631 size, strength, courage and pugnacity of the male, his special weapons of offense, as well as his special means of defense, have been acquired or modified through that form of selection which I have called sexual. This does not depend on any superiority in the general struggle for life, Kg. 78. Cercopithecus diana (from Brehm). but on certain individuals of one sex, generally the male, being successful in conquering other males, and leaving a larger number of offspring to inherit their superiority than do tbe less successful males. There is another and more peaceful kind of contest, in 6355 THE DESCENT OF MAN. which the males endeavor to excite or allure the females Ly various charms. This is probably carried on in some cases by the powerful odors emitted by the males during the breeding-season; the odoriferous glands having been acquired through sexual selection. Whether the same view can be extended to the voice is doubtful, for the vocal organs of the males must have been strengthened by use during maturity, under the powerful excitements of love, jealousy or rage, and will consequently have been transmitted to the same sex. Various crests, tufts and mantles of hair, which are either confined to the male, or are more developed in this sex than in the female, seem in most cases to be merely ornamental, though they sometimes serve as a defense against rival males. There is even reason to suspect that the branching horns of stags and the elegant horns of cer- tain antelopes, though properly serving as weapons of oifense or defense, have been partly modified for ornament. When the male differs in color from the female, he gen- erally exhibits darker and more strongly contrasted tints. W T e do not in this class meet with the splendid red, blue, yellow and green tints so common with male birds and many other animals. The naked parts, however, of cer- tain Quadrumana must be excepted; for such parts, often oddly situated, are brilliantly colored in some species. The colors of the male in other cases may be due to simple variation without the aid of selection. But when the colors are diversified and strongly pronounced, when they are not developed until near maturity, and when they are lost after emasculation, we can hardly avoid the conclusion that they have been acquired through sexual selection for the sake of ornament and have been transmitted exclusively, or almost exclusively, to the same sex. When both sexes are colored in the same manner, and the colors are conspicuous or curiously arranged, without being of the least apparent use as a protection, and especially when they are associated with various other ornamental appendages, we are led by analogy to the same conclusion, namely, that they have been acquired through sexual selection, although trans- mitted to both sexes. That conspicuous and diversified colors, whether confined to the males or co'mmon to both sexes, are as a general rule associated in the same groups and sub-groups with other secondary sexual characters serv- ing for war or for ornament will be found to hold good, if MAMMALS. 633 we look back to the various cases given in this and the last chapter. The law of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes, as far as color and other ornaments are concerned, has prevailed far more extensively with mammals than with birds; but weapons, such as horns and tusks, have often been transmitted either exclusively or much more perfectly to the males than to the females. This is surprising, for, as the males generally use their weapons for defense against enemies of all kinds, their weapons would have been of service to the females. As far as we can see their absence in this sex can be accounted for only by the form of inher- itance which has prevailed. Finally, with quadrupeds the contest between the individuals of the same sex, whether peaceful or bloody, has, with the rarest exceptions, been confined to the males; so that the latter have been modified through sexual selection, far more commonly than the females, either for fighting with each other or for alluring the opposite sex. PART III. SEXUAL SELECTION IN RELATION TO MAN. CHAPTER XIX. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHAEACTERS OF MAN. Differences between man and woman Causes of such differences and of certain characters common to both sexes Law of battle Differences in mental powers and voice On the influence of beauty in deterniinging the marriages of mankind Attention paid by savages to ornaments Their ideas of beauty in woman The tendency to exaggerate each natural peculiarity. WITH mankind the differences between the sexes are greater than in most of the Quadrumana, but not so great as in some, for instance, the mandrill. Man on an average is considerably taller, heavier and stronger than woman, with squarer shoulders and more plainly pronounced mus- cles. Owing to the relation which exists between muscular development and the projection of the brows,* the super- ciliary ridge is generally more marked in man than in woman. His body, and especially his face, is more hairy,' and his voice has a different and more powerful tone, In certain races the women are said to differ slightly in tint from the men. For instance, Schweinfurth, in speaking of a negress belonging to the Monbuttoos, who inhabit the interior of Africa a few degrees north of the equator, says: "Like all her race, she had a skin several shades lighter than her husband's, being something of the color of half-roasted coffee. "f As the women labor in the fields and are quite unclothed, it is not likely that they differ in color from the men owing to less exposure to the weather. *Schaaffhausen, translation in "Anthropological Review," Oct., 1868, pp. 419, 420, 427. f"The Heart of Africa," English transl ., 1873, vol.-i., p. 544 SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 635 European women are perhaps the brighter colored of the two sexes, as may be seen when both have been equally exposed. Man is more courageous, pugnacious and energetic than woman, and has a more inventive genius. His brain is absolutely larger, but whether or not proportionately to his larger body, has not, I believe, been fully ascertained. In woman the face is rounder; the jaws and the base of the skull smaller; the outlines of the body rounder, in parts more prominent; and her pelvis is broader than in trin;* but this latter character may perhaps be considered rather as a primary than a secondary sexual character. She comes to maturity at an earlier age than man. As Avith animals of all classes, so with man, the dis- tinctive characters of the male sex are not fully developed until he is nearly mature; and, if emasculated, they never appear. The beard, for instance, is a secondary sexual character, and male children are beardless, though at an early age they have abundant hair on the head. It is probably due to the rather late appearance in life of the successive variations whereby man has acquired his mascu- line characters that they are transmitted to the male sex alone. Male and female children resemble each other closely, like the young of so many other animals in which the adult sexes differ widely; they likewise resemble the mature female much more closely than the mature male. The female, however, ultimately assumes certain distinctive characters, and, in the formation of her skull, is said to be intermediate between the child and the man. f Again, as the young of closely allied though distinct species do not differ nearly so much from each other as do the adults, so it is with the children of the different races of man. Some have even maintained that race - differences cannot be detected in the infantile skull. J In regard to color, the new-born negro child is reddish nut-brown, which soon becomes slaty-gray; the black color being fully developed *Ecker, translation in "Anthropological Review," Oct., 1868, pp. 351-356. The comparison of the form of the skull in men and women has been followed out with much care by Welcker. fEcker and Welcker, ibid, pp, 352, 355; Vogt, "Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., p. 81. tSchaaffhausen. " Anthropolog. Review," ibid, p. 429. 636 THE DESCENT OF MAN. within a year in the Soudan, but not until three years in Egypt. The eyes of the negro are at first blue, and the hair chestnut-brown rather than black, being curled only at the ends. The children of the Australians immediately after birth are yellowish-brown, and become dark at a later age. Those of the Gunaranys of Paraguay are whitish- yellow, but they acquire, in the course of a few weeks, the yellowish-brown tint of their parents. Similar observations have been made in other parts of America.* I have specified the foregoing differences between the male and female sex in mankind, because they are curiously like those of the Quadrumana. With these animals the female is mature at an earlier age than the male; at least this is certainly the case in Cebus azarce. \ The males of jiiost species are larger and stronger than the females, of which fact the gorilla affords a well-known instance. Even in so trifling a character as the greater prominence of the superciliary ridge, the males of certain monkeys differ from the females, J and agree in this respect with mankind. In the gorilla and certain other monkeys the cranium of the adult male presents a strongly marked sagittal crest, which is absent in the female; and Ecker found a trace of a similar difference between the two sexes in the Australians.! With monkeys, when there is any difference in the voice, that of the male is the more pow- erful. We have seen that certain male monkeys have a well-developed beard, which is quite deficient, or much less developed, in the female. No instance is known of the beard, whiskers or mustache being larger in the female than in the male monkey. Even in the color of the beard there is a curious parallelism between man and the Quadrumana, * Pruner-Bey, on negro infants, as quoted by Vogt, " Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., 1864, p. 189; for further facts on negro infants, as quoted from Winterbottom and Camper, see Lawrence, " Lectures on Physiology," etc., 1822, p. 451. For theinfantsof theGunaranya see Kengger, "Saugethiere," etc., s. 3. See also Godron, " De 1'Espece," torn, ii, 1859, p. 253. For the Australians, Waitz, " Intro- duct, to Anthropology, "Eng. translat., 1863, p. 99. j- Rengger, "Saugethiere," etc,, 1830, s. 19. r l As in Macacus cynomolgus (Desmarest, "Mammalogie," p. 65), and in Hylobates agilis (Geoffroy St.-Hilaire and F. Cuvier, "Hist. Nat. des Mamni.," 1824, torn, i, p. 2). | " Anthropological Review, " Oct., 1868, p. 353. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 637 for with man when the beard differs^in color from the hair of the head, as is commonly the case* it is, I believe, almost always of a lighter tint, being often reddish. I have repeatedly observed this fact in England; but two gentle- men have lately written to me, saying that they form an exception to the rule. One of these gentlemen accounts for the fact by the wide difference in color of the hair on the paternal and maternal sides of his family. Both had long been aware of this peculiarity (one of them having often been accused of dyeing his beard), and had been thus led to observe other men, and were convinced that the exceptions were very rare. Dr. Hooker attended to this little point for me in Russia, and found no exception to the rule. In Calcutta Mr. J. Scott, of the Botanic Gardens, was so kind as to observe the many races of men to be seen there, as well as in some other parts of India, namely, two races of Sikhim, the Bhoteas, Hindoos, Burmese and Chinese, most of which races have very little hair on the face; and he always found that when there was any difference in color between the hair of the head and the beard, the latter was invariably lighter. Now with monkeys, as has already been stated, the beard frequently differs strikingly in color from the hair of the head, and in such cases it is always of a lighter hue, being often pure white, sometimes yellow or reddish.* In regard to the general hairiness of the body, the women in all races are less hairy than the men ; and in some few Quadrumana the under side of the body of the female is less hairy than that of the male.f Lastly, male monkeys, like men, are bolder and fiercer * Mr. Blyth informs me that he has only seen one instance of the beard, whiskers, etc., in a monkey becoming white with old age, as is so commonly the case with us. This, however, occurred in an aged Macacus cynamolgus, kept in confinement, whose mustaches were " remarkably long and human-like." Altogether this old monkey presented a ludicrous resemblance to one of the reigning monarchs of Europe, after whom he was universally nick-named. In certain- races of man the hair on the head hardly ever becomes gray; thus Mr. D. Forbes has never, as he informs me, seen an instance with the Aymaras and Quchuas of South America. f This is the case with the females of several species of Hylobates. See Geoffrey St.-Hilaire and F. Cuvier, "Hist. Xat. des Manirn.," torn. i. See, also, on H. lar, "Penny Cyclopedia," voL ii, pp. 149, 150. 638 THE DESCENT OF MAN. than the females. They lead the troop, and, when there is danger, come to the front. We thus see how close is tho parallelism between the sexual differences of man and the Quadrumana. With some few species, however, as with certain baboons, the orang and the gorilla, there is a con- siderably greater difference between the sexes, as in the size of the canine teeth, in the development and color of the hair, and especially in the color of the naked parts of the skin, than in mankind. All the secondary sexual characters of man are highly variable, even within the limits of the same race; and they differ much in the several races. These two rules hold good generally throughout the animal kingdom. In the excellent observations made on board the " Xovara,"* the male Australians were found to exceed the females by only sixty-five millimeters in height, while with the Javans the average excess was two hundred and eighteen millimeters; so that in this latter race the difference in height between the sexes is more than thrice as great as with the Australians. Numerous measurements were carefully made of the stat- ure, the circumference of the neck and chest, the length of the back-bone and of the arms, in various races; and nearly all these measurements show that the males differ much more from one another than do the females. This fact indicates that, as far as these characters are con- cerned, it is the male which has been chiefly modified, since the several races diverged from their common stock. The development of the beard and the hairiness of the body differ remarkably in the men of distinct races, and even in different tribes or families of the same race. We Europeans sec this among ourselves. In the Island of St. Kilda, according to Martin, f the men do not acquire beards until the age of thirty or upward, and even then the beards are very thin. On the Europseo- Asiatic continent, beards prevail until we pass beyond India ; though with the natives of Ceylon they are often absent, as was noticed in ancient times by Diodorus.J Eastward * The results were deduced by Dr. WeisbacL. from the measure- ments made by Drs. K. Scherzer and Schwarz. See " Reise der Novara :' Anthropolog. Theil," 1867, ss. 216, 231, 234, 236. 239. 269. f "Voyage to St. Kilda" (3d edit., 1753), p. 37. $ Sir J. E. Tennent, "Ceylon," vol. ii, 1859, p. 107. SECOND AR T SEX UAL CHAR A CTERS. 639 of India beards disappear, as with the Siamese, Malays, Kalmucks, Chinese, and Japanese; nevertheless the Ainos,* who inhabit the northernmost islands of the Japan Archi- pelago, are the hairiest men in the world. With negroes the beard is scanty or wanting, and they rarely have whiskers; in both sexes the body is frequently almost des- titute of fine down.f On the other hand, the Papauns of the Malay Archipelago, who are nearly as black as negroes, possess well-developed beards. J In the Pacific Ocean the inhabitants of the Fiji Archipelago have large bushy beards, while those of the not distant archipelagoes of Tonga and Samoa are beardless; but these men belong to distinct races. In the Ellice group all the inhabitants belong to the same race; yet on one island alone, namely Nunemaya, " the men have splendid beards; ' while on the other islands " they have, as a rule, a dozen straggling hairs for a beard. " Throughout the great American continent the men may be said to be beardless; but in almost all the tribes a few short hairs are apt to appear on the face, especially in old age. With the tribes of North America, Catlin estimates that eighteen out of twenty men are completely destitute by nature of a beard; but occasionally there may be seen a a man who has neglected to pluck out the hairs at puberty, with a soft beard an inch or two in length. The Guaranys of Paraguay differ from all the surrounding tribes in hav- ing a small beard, and even some hair on the body, but no whiskers. || I am informed by Mr. D. Forbes, who par- ticularly attended to this point, that the Aymaras and * Quatref ages, "Revue des Cours Scientifiques," Aug. 29, 1868, p. 630; Vogt, " Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., p. 127. fOn the beards of negroes, Vogt, " Lectures," etc., p. 127; Waitz, " Introduct. to Anthropology," Eng. translat., 1863, vol. i, p. 96. It is remarkable that in the United States (" Investigations in Military and Anthropological Statistics of American Soldiers," 1869, p. 569), the pure negroes and their crossed offspring seem to have bodies almost as hairy as Europeans. - % Wallace. " The Malay Arch.," vol. ii, 1869, p. 178. Dr. J. Barnard Davis on "Oceanic Races," in " Anthropolog. Review," April, 1870, pp. 185, 191. | Catlin, " North American Indians," 3d edit., 1842,_ vol. ii, p. 227. On the Guaranys, see Azara, " Voyages dans 1'Amerique Merid.," torn, ii., Ib09, p. 58; also Rengger, "Saugethiere von Paraguay," b. 3 640 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Quichuas of the Cordillera are remarkably hairless, yet in old age a few straggling hairs occasionally appear on the chin. The men of these two tribes have very little hair on the various parts of the body where hair grows abundantly in Europeans, and the women have none on the corre- sponding parts. The hair on the head, however, attains an extraordinary length in both sexes, often reaching almost to the ground; and this is likewise the case with some of the North American tribes. In the amount of hair and in the general shape of the body the sexes of the American aborigines do not differ so much from each other as in most other races.* This fact is analogous with what occurs with some closely allied monkeys; thus the sexes of the chimpanzee are not as different as those of the orang or gorilla, f In the previous chapters we have seen that with mam- mals, birds, fishes, insects, etc., many characters, which there is every reason to believe were primarily gained through sexual selection by one sex, have been transferred to the other. As this same form of transmission has ap- parently prevailed much with mankind, it will save useless repetition if we discuss the origin of characters peculiar to the male sex together with certain other characters com- mon to both sexes. Law of Battle. With savages, for instance, the Aus- tralians, the women are the constant cause of war both between members of the same tribe and between distinct tribes. So no doubt it was in ancient times; "namfuitante Helenam mulier teterriina belli causa." With some of the North American Indians the contest is reduced to a system. That excellent observer, Hearne,J says: "It has ever been the custom among these people for the men to wrestle *Prof. and Mrs. Agassiz ("Journey in Brazil," p. 530), remark that the sexes of the American Indians differ less than those of the negroes and of the higher races. See also Rengger, ibid., p. 3, on the Guaranys. f Riitimeyer, "Die Grenzen der Thierwelt; eine Betrachtung zu Darwin's Lehre," 1868, s. 54. $"A Journey from Prince of Wales Fort.," 8vo. edit., Dublin, 1796, p. 104. Sir J. Lubbock ("Origin of Civilization," 1870, p. 69), gives other and similar cases in North America. For the Guanas of South America see Azara, "Voyages, "etc., torn, ii, p. 94. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 641 for any woman to whom they are attached; and, of course, the strongest party always carries off the prize. A weak man, unless he be a good hunter and well beloved, is seldom per- mitted to keep a wife that a stronger man thinks worth his notice. This custom prevails throughout all the tribes, and causes a great spirit of emulation among their youth, who are upon all occasions, from their childhood, trying their strength and skill in wrestling." With the Guanas of South America, Azara states that the men rarely marry till twenty years old or more, as before that age they cannot conquer their rivals. Other similar facts could be given; but even if we had no evidence on this head we might feel almost sure, from the analogy of the higher Quadrumana,* that the law of battle had prevailed with man during the early stages of his development. The occasional appearance at the pres- ent day of canine teeth which project above the others, with traces of a diastema or open space for the reception of the opposite canines, is in all probability a case of reversion to a former state, when the progenitors of man were provided with these weapons, like so many existing male Quadrumana. It was remarked in a former chapter that as man gradually became erect, and continually used his hands and arms for fighting with sticks and stones, as well as for the other purposes of life, he would have used his jaws and teeth less and less. The jaws, together with their muscles, would then have been reduced, through disuse, as would the teeth through the not well understood principles of correlation and economy of growth; for we everywhere see that parts, which are no longer of service, are reduced in size. By such steps the original inequality between the jawa and teeth in the two sexes of mankind would ultimately have been obliterated. The case is almost parallel with that of many male ruminants, in which the canine teeth have been reduced to mere rudiments, or have disappeared, apparently, in consequence of the development of horns. As the prodig- ious difference between the skulls of the two sexes in the orang and gorilla stands in close relation with the develop- ment of the immense canine teeth in the males, we may infer that the reduction of the jaws and teeth in the early *0n the fighting of the male gorillas, see Dr. Savage, in "Boston Journal of Nat. Hist.," vol v., 1847, p. 423. On Presbytia entellus, see the "Indian Field," 1859, p. 146. 642 THE DESCENT OF MAN. male progenitors of man must have led to a most striking and favorable change in his appearance. There can be little doubt that the greater size and strength of man, in comparison with woman, together with his broader shoulders, more developed muscles, rugged out- line of body, his greater courage and pugnacity are all due in chief part to inheritance from his ha!f- human male ances- tors. These characters would, however, have been preserved or even augmented during the long ages of man's savagery, by the success of the strongest and boldest men, both in the general struggle for life and in their contests for wives; a suc- cess which would have insured their leaving a more numer- ous progeny than their less favored brethren. It is not proba- ble that the greater strength of man was primarily acquired through the inherited effects of his having worked harder than woman for his own subsistence and that of his family; for the women in all barbarous nations are compelled to work at least as hard as the men. With civilized people the arbitrament of battle for the possession of the women has long ceased; on' the other hand, the men, as a general rule, have to work harder than the women for their Joint subsistence, and thus their greater strength will have been kept up. Difference in the Mental Powers of the Two Sexes. With respect to differences of this nature between man and woman it is probable that sexual selection has played a highly important part. I am aware that some writers doubt whether there is any such inherent difference ; but this is at least probable from the analogy of the lower ani- mals which present other secondary sexual characters. No one disputes that the bull differs in disposition from the cow, the wild-boar from the sow, the stallion from the mare, and, as is well known to the keepers of menageries, the males of the larger apes from the females. Woman seems to differ from man in mental disposition, chiefly in her greater tenderness and less selfishness; and this holds good even with savages, as shown by a well-known passage in " Mungo Park's Travels," and by statements made by many other travelers. Woman, owing to her maternal instincts, displays these qualities toward her infant in an eminent degree; therefore it is likely that she would often extend them toward her fellow-creatures. Man is the rival SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 643 of other men; he delights in competition, and this leads to ambition which passes too easily into selfishness. These latter qualities seem to be his natural and unfortunate birthright. It is generally admitted that with woman the powers of intuition, of rapid perception, and perhaps of imitation, are more strongly marked than in man; but some, at least, of these faculties are characteristic of the .lower races, and, therefore, of a past and lower state of civilization. The chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is shown by man's attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can woman whether requir- ing deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpt- ure, music (inclusive both of composition and perform- ance), history, science and philosophy, with half a dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the devia- tion from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on " Hereditary Genius/' that if men are capable of a decided pre-eminence over women in many subjects, the average of mental power in man must be above that of woman. Among the half-human progenitors of man, and among savages, there have been struggles between the males during many generations for the possession of the females. But mere bodily strength and size would do little for victory, unless associated with courage, perseverence and deter- mined energy. With social animals the young males have to pass through many a contest before they win a female, and the older males have to retain their females by renewed battles. They have, also, in the case of mankind, to defend their females, as well as their young, from enemies of all kinds, and to hunt for their joint subsistence. But to avoid enemies or to attack them with success, to capture wild animals, and to fashion weapons, requires the aid of the higher mental faculties, namely, observation, reason, invention, or imagination. These various faculties will thus have been continually put to the test and selected during manhood; they will, moreover, have been strength- ened by use during this same period of life. Consequently, in accordance witli the urincipJ often alluded to, we 644 THE DESCENT OF MAN. might expect that they would at least tend to be trans- mitted chiefly to the male offspring at the corresponding period of manhood. Now, when two men are put into competition, or a man with a woman, both possessed of every mental quality in equal perfection, save that one has higher energy, perse- verance and courage, the latter will generally become more eminent in every pursuit and will gain the ascendency.* He may be said to possess genius for genius has been de- clared by a great authority to be patience; and patience, in this sense, means unflinching, undaunted perseverance. But this view of genius is perhaps deficient; for without the aigher powers of the imagination and reason, no eminent success can be gained in many subjects. These latter faculties, as well as the former, will have been de- veloped in man, partly through sexual selection that is, through the contest of rival males, and partly through natural selection that is, from success in the general struggle for life; and as in both cases the struggle will have been during maturity, the characters gained will have been transmitted more fully to the male than to the female off- spring. It accords in a striking manner with this view of the modification and re-enforcement of many of our mental faculties by sexual selection, that, firstly, they notoriously undergo a considerable change at puberty, f and, secondly, that eunuchs remain throughout life inferior in these same qualities. Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman. It is, indeed, fortunate that the law of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes pre- vails with mammals ; otherwise it is probable that man would have become as superior in mental endowment to woman, as the peacock is in ornamental plumage to the peahen. It must be borne in mind that the tendency in char- acters acquired by either sex late in life, to be transmitted to the same sex at the same age, and of early acquired characters to be transmitted to both sexes, are rules which, though general, do not always hold. If they always held *J. Stuart Mill remarks (" The Subjection of Women," 1869, p. 122); ' The things in which man most excels woman are those which require most plodding, and long hammering at single thoughts. " What is this but energy and perseverance ? f Maudsley, "Mind and Body SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 645 good, we might conclude (but I here exceed my proper bounds) that the inherited effects of the early education of boys and girls would be transmitted equally to both sexes; so that the present inequality in mental power between the sexes would not be effaced by a similar course of early training; nor can it have been caused by their dissimilar early training. In order that woman should reach the same standard as man, she ought, when nearly adult, to be trained to energy and perseverance and to have her reason and imagination exercised to the highest point; and then she would probably transmit these qualities chiefly to her adult daughters. All women, however, could not be thus raised, unless during many generations those who excelled in the above robust virtues were married and produced off- spring in larger numbers than other women. As before remarked of bodily strength, although men do not now fight for their wives, and this form of selection has passed away, yet during manhood they generally undergo a severe struggle in order to maintain themselves and their families; and this will tend to keep up or even increase their mental powers, and, as a consequence, the present inequality be- tween the sexes.* Voice and Musical Powers. In some species of Quadru- mana there is a great difference between the adult sexes, in the power of their voices and in the development of the vocal organs; and man appears to have inherited this difference from his early progenitors. His vocal cords are about one-third longer than in woman, or than in boys ; and emasculation produces the same effect on him as on the lower animals, for it "arrests that prominent growth of the thyroid, etc., which accompanies the elongation of the cords, "f With respect to the cause of this difference between the sexes, I have nothing to add to the remarks in * An observation by Vogt bears on this subject: he says, " It is a remarkable circumstance, that the differences between the sexes, as regards the cranial cavity, increases with the development of the race, so that the male European excels much more the female, than the negro the negress. Welcker confirms this statement of Huschke from his measurements of negro and German skulls." But Vogt admits (" Lectures on Man," Eng. translat., 1864, p. 81) that more observations are requisite on this point. f Owen, "Anatomy of Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 603. 646 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the last chapter on the probable effects of the long-contin- ued use of the vocal organs by the male under the excite- ment of love, rage and jealousy. According to Sir Duncan Gibb,* the voice and the form of the larynx differ in the different races of mankind; but with the Tartars, Chinese, etc., the voice of the male is said not to diifer so much from that of the female, as in most other races. The capacity and love for singing or music, though not a sexual character in man, -must not here be passscl over. Although the sounds emitted by animals of all kinds serve many purposes, a strong case can be made out, that the vocal organs were primarily used and perfected in rela- tion to the propagation of the species. Insects and some few spiders are the lowest animals which voluntarily pro- duce any sound; and this is generally effected by the aid of beautifully constructed stridulating organs, which are often confined to the males. The sounds thus produced consist, I believe in all cases, of the same note, repeated rhythmi- cally;! and this is sometimes pleasing even to the ears of man. The chief and, in some cases, exclusive purpose appears to be either to call or charm the opposite sex. The sounds produced by fishes are said in some cases to be made only by the males during the breeding-season. All the air-breathing Vertebrata necessarily possess an appa- ratus for inhaling and expelling air, with a pipe capable of being closed at one end. Hence when the primeval mem- bers of this class were strongly excited and 'their muscles violently contracted, purposeless sounds would almost cer- tainly have been produced; and these, if they proved in any way serviceable, might readily have been modified or intensified by the preservation of properly adapted vari- ations. The lowest Vertebrates which breathe air are Amphibians; and of these, frogs and toads possess vocal organs, which are incessantly used during the breeding- season, and which are often more highly developed in the male than in the female. The male alone of the tortoise utters a noise, and this only during the season of love. Male alligators roar or bellow during the same season. Every one knows how much birds use their vocal organs as '"Journal of the Antliropolog. Soc.," April, 1869, pp. 57, 66. fDr. Scudder, "Notes on Striduiation," in " Proc. Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist., "vol. xi, April, 1868. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS, 617 a means of courtship; and some species lik#i* perform what may be called instrumental music. In the class of mammals, with which we are iiere more particularly concerned, the males of alxnokt all the species use their voices during the breeding-season much more than at any other time ; and some are absolutely mute excepting at this season. With otner species both sexes, or only the females, use their voices as a love-call. Con- sidering these facts, and that the vocal organs of some quadrupeds are much more largely developed in the male than in the female, either permanently or temporarily, during the breed ing-season; and considering that in most of the lower classes the sounds produced by the males serve not only to call but to excite or allure the female; it is a surprising fact that we have not as yet any good evidence that these organs are used by male mammals to charm the females. The American Mycetes caraya perhaps forms an exception, as does the Hylobates agilis, an ape allied to man. This gibbon has an extremely loud but musical voice. Mr. Waterhouse states,* " It appeared to me that in ascending and descending the scale the intervals were always exactly half-tones; and I am sure that the highest note was the exact octave to the lowest. The quality of the notes is very musical; and I do not doubt that a good violinist would be able to give a correct idea of the gibbon's composition, excepting as regards its loudness." Mr. Waterhouse then gives the notes. Prof. Owen, who is a musician, confirms the foregoing statement, and remarks, though erroneously, that this gibbon, "alone of brute mammals,' may be said to sing." It appears to be much excited after its performance. Unfortunately, its habits have never been closely observed in a state of nature; but from the analogy of other animals, it is probable that it uses its musical powers more especially during the season of courtship. This gibbon is not the only species in the genus which sings, for my -son, Francis Darwin, attentively listened in "the Zoological Gardens to H. leuciscus while singing a cadence of three notes, in true musical intervals and with a clear musical tone. It is a more surprising fact that * Given in W. C. L. Martin's " General Introduction to Nat. Hist, of Mamm. Animals," 1841, \>. 482: Owen "Anatomy of Vertebrates/' vol. iii, p. 600. $4 THE DESCENT OF MAN, certain rodents utter musical sounds. Singing mice have often been mentioned and exhibited, but imposture has commonly been suspected. We have, however, at last a clear account by a well-known observer, the Eev. S. Lock- wood,* of the musical powers of an American species, the Hesperomys cognatus, belonging to a genus distinct from that of the English mouse. This little animal was kept in confinement, and the performance was repeatedly heard. In one of the two chief songs, " the last bar would fre- quently be prolonged to two or three; and she would some- times change from C sharp and D to C natural and D, then warble on. these two notes awhile, and wind up with a quick chirp on C sharp and D. The distinctness between the semitones was very marked and easily appreciable to a good ear." Mr. Lockwood gives both songs in musical notation; and adds that though this little mouse "had no ear for time, yet she would keep to the key of B (two flats) and strictly in a major key. . .. . Her soft clear voice falls an octave with all the precision possible; then at the wind-up it rises again into a quick trill on C sharp and D." A critic has asked how the ears of man, and he ougnt to have added of other animals, could have been adapted by selection so as to distinguish musical notes. But this question shows some confusion on the subject; a noise is the sensation resulting from the co-existence of several aerial "simple vibrations" of various periods, each of which intermits so frequently that its separate existence cannot be perceived. It is only in the want of continuity of such vibrations, and in their want of harmony inter se, that a noise differs from a musical note. Thus an ear to be capable of discriminating noises and the high importance of this power to all animals is admitted by every one must be sensitive to musical notes. We have evidence of this capacity even low down in the animal scale; thus Crusta- ceans are provided with auditory hairs of different lengths, which have been seen to vibrate when the proper musical notes are struck, f As stated in a previous chapter, similar observations have been made on the hairs of the antennae of gnats. It has been positively asserted by good observers *The "American Naturalist," 1871, p. 761. iHelmholtz, " Tkeorie Phys. de 1* Musique," 1868, p. 187. SECOND AR T SEX U A L CHARACTERS. 649 that spiders are attracted by music. It is also well known that some dogs howl when hearing particular tones.* Seals apparently appreciate music, and their fondness for it " was well known to the ancients, and is often taken advantage of by the hunters at the present day."f Therefore, as far as the mere perception of musical notes is concerned, there seems no special difficulty in the case of man or of any other animal. Helmholtz has explained on physiological principles why concords are agreeable and discords disagreeable to the human ear; but we are little concerned with these, as music in harmony is a late inven- tion. We are more concerned with melody, and here again, according to Helmholtz, it is intelligible why the notes of our musical scale are used. The ear analyzes all sounds into their component " simple vibrations," although we are not conscious of this analysis. In a musical note the lowest in pitch of these is generally predominant, and the others which are less marked are the octave, the twelfth, the second octave, etc., all harmonies of the fundamental predominant note; any two notes of our scale have many of these harmonic over-tones in common. It seems pretty clear, then, that if an animal always wished to sing precisely the same song, he would guide himself by sounding those notes in succession which possess many over-tones in common that is, he would choose for his song notes which belong to our musical scale. But if it be further asked why musical tones in a certain order and rhythm give man and other animals pleasure, we can no more give the reason than for the pleasantness of certain tastes and smells. That they do give pleasure of some kind to animals we may infer from their being pro- duced during the season of courtship by many insects, spiders, fishes, amphibians and birds ; for unless the females were able to appreciate such sounds and were excited or charmed by them, the persevering efforts of the males, and the complex structures often possessed by them alone, would be useless ; and this it is impossible to believe.- * Several accounts have been published to this effect. Mr. Peach writes to me that he has repeatedly found that an old dog of his howls when B flat is sounded on the flute, and to no other note. I Biay add another instance of a dog always whining, when one note on a concertina, which was out of tune, was played. fMr. R. Brown, in "Proc. Zool. Soc.." 1868, p. 410. 650 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Human song is generally admitted to be the basis or origin of instrumental music. As neither the enjoyment nor the capacity of producing musical notes are faculties of the least use to man in reference to his daily habits of life, they must be ranked among the most mysterious with which he is endowed. They are present, though in a very rude condition, in men of all races, even the most savage; but so different is the taste of the several races that our music gives no pleasure to savages, and their music is to us in most cases hideous and unmeaning. Dr. Seemann, in some interesting remarks on this subject,* " doubts whether even among the nations of Western Europe, intimately connected as they are by close and frequent intercourse, the music of the one is interpreted in the same sense by the others. By traveling eastward we find that there is certainly a different language of music. Songs of joy and dance accompaniments are no longer, as with us, in the major keys, but always in the minor." Whether or not the half -human progenitors of man possessed, like the singing gibbons, the capacity of producing, and, therefore, no doubt of appreciating, musical notes, we know that man possessed these faculties at a very remote period. M. Lartet has described two flutes made out of the bones and horns of the reindeer, found in caves together with flint tools and the remains of extinct animals. The arts of singing and of dai?cing are also very ancient, and arc now practiced by all or nearly all the lowest races of man. Poetry, which may be considered as the offspring of song, is likewise so ancient that many persons have felt astonished that it should have arisen during the earliest ages of which \ve have any record. We see that the musical faculties, which are not wholly deficient in any race, are capable of prompt and high development, for Hottentots and negroes have become excellent musicians, although in their native countries they rarely practice anything that we should consider music. Schweinfurth, however, was pleased with some of the simple melodies which he heard in the interior of Africa. But there is nothing anomalous in the musical * "Journal of Anthropolog. Soc.," Oct., 1870, p. 155. See also the several later chapters in Sir John Lubbock's " Prehistoric Times," second edition, 1869, which contain an admirable account of the habits of savages. - - SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 651 faculties lying dormant in man; some species of birds which never naturally sing, can without much difficulty be taught to do so; thus a house-sparrow has learned the song of a linnet. As these two species are closely allied and belong to the order of Insessores, which includes nearly all the singing-birds in the world, it is possible that a pro- genitor of the sparrow may have been a songster. It is more remarkable that parrots, belonging to a group distinct from the Insessores, and having differently constructed vocal organs, can be taught not only to speak, but to pipe or whistle tunes invented by man, so that they must have some musical capacity. Nevertheless, it would be very rash to assume that parrots are descended from some ancient form which was a songster. Many cases could be advanced of organs and instincts originally adapted for one purpose, having been utilized for some distinct purpose.* Hence the capacity for high musical development which the savage races of man possess, may be due either to the prac- tice by our semi-human progenitors of some rude form of music, or simply to their having acquired the proper vocal organs for a different purpose. But in this latter case we must assume, as in the above instance of parrots, and as seems to occur with many animals, that they already pos- sessed some sense of melody. Music arouses in us various emotions, but not the more terrible ones of horror, fear, rage, etc. It awakens the gentler feelings of tenderness and love, which readily pass into devotion. In the Chinese annals it is said: " Music hath the power of making heaven descend upon earth/'' It likewise stirs up in us the sense of triumph and the glorious ardor for war These powerful and mingled feel- ings may well give rise to the sense of sublimity. We can concentrate, as Dr. Seamarm observes, greater intensity of feeling in a single musical note than in pages of writing. * Since this chapter was printed, I have seen a valuable article by Mr. Chauncy Wright (" North American Review," Oct., 1870, p. 293), who, in discussing the above subject, remarks: " There are many consequences of the ultimate laws or uniformities of nature, through which the acquisition of one useful power will bring with it many resulting advantages as well as limiting disadvantages, actual or possible, which the principle of utility may not have comprehended in its actions." As I have attempted to show in an early chapter of this work, this principle has an important bearing on the acquisition by man of some of his mental characteristics. 652 THE DESCENT OF MAN. It is probable that nearly the same emotions, but muok weaker and far less complex, are felt by birds when the male pours forth his full volume of song, in rivalry with other males, to captivate the female. Love is still the commonest theme of our songs. As Herbert Spencer re- marks, " music arouses dormant sentiments of which we had not conceived the possibility, and do not know the meaning; or, as Eichter says, tells us of things we have not seen and shall not see." Conversely, when vivid emotions are felt and expressed by the orator, or even in common ispeech, musical cadences and rhythm are instinctively used. [The negro in Africa when excited often bursts forth in song; "another will reply in song, while the company, as if touched by a musical wave, murmur a chorus in perfect unison."* Even monkeys express strong feelings in dif- ferent tones anger and impatience by low, fear and pain by high notes, f The sensations and ideas thus excited in us by music, or expressed by the cadences of oratory, appear from their vagueness, yet depth, like mental reversions to the emotions and thoughts of a long past age. All these facts with respect to music and impassioned speech become intelligible to a certain extent, if we may assume that musical tones and rhythm were used by our half-human ancestors, during the season of courtship, when animals of all kinds are excited not only by love, but by the strong passions of jealousy, rivalry, and triumph. From the deeply laid principle of inherited associations, musical tones in this case would be likely to call up vaguely and indefinitely the strong emotions of a long-past age. As we have every reason to suppose that articulate speech is one of the latest, as it certainly is the highest, of the arts acquired by man, and as the instinctive power of producing musical notes and rhythms is developed low down in the animal series, it would be altogether opposed to the principle of evolution, if we were to admit that man's musical capacity has been developed from the tones used in impassioned speech. We must suppose that the rhythms and cadences of oratory are derived from previously *Winwood Reade, "The Martyrdom of Man," 1872, p. 441, and "African Sketch-book," 1873, vol. ii, p. 313. f Rengger, ' ' Sftugethiere von Paraguay, " s. 49. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 653 developed musical powers.* We can thus understand how it is that music, dancing, song, and poetry are such very ancient arts. "We may go even further than this, and, as remarked in a former chapter, believe that musical sounds afforded one of the bases for the development of language, f As the males of several quadrumanous animals have their vocal organs much more developed than in the females, and as a gibbon, one of the anthropomorphous apes, pours forth a whole octave of musical notes and may be said to sing? it appears probable that the progenitors of man, either the males or females or both sexes, before acquiring the power of expressing their mutual love in articulate language, endeavored to charm each other with musical notes and rhythm. So little is known about the use of the voice by the Quadrumana during the season of love, that we have no means of judging whether the habit of singing was first acquired by our male or female ancestors. Women are generally thought to possess sweeter voices than men, and as far as this serves as any guide, we may infer that they first acquired musical powers in order to attract the other sex. | But, if so, this must have occured long ago, before our ancestors had become sufficiently human to treat and value their women merely as useful slaves. The impas- *See the very interesting discussion on the " Origin and Function of Music," by Mr. Herbert Spencer, in his collected "Essays," 1858, p. 359. Mr. Spencer comes to an exactly opposite conclusion to that at which I have arrived. He concludes, as did Diderot formerly, that the cadences used in emotional speech afford the foundation from which music has been developed; while I conclude that musical notes and rhythms were first acquired by the male or female progen- itors of mankind for the sake of charming the opposite sex. Thus musical tones became firmly associated with some of the strongest passions an animal is capable of feeling, and are consequently used instinctively, or through association when strong emotions are expressed in speech. Mr. Spencer does not offer any satisfactory explanation, nor can I, why high or deep notes should be expressive, both with man and the lower animals, of certain emotions. Mr. Spencer gives also an interesting discussion on the relations between poetry, recitative and song. f I find in Lord Monboddo's "Origin of Language," vol. i, (1774), p. 469, that Dr. Blacklock likewise thought "that the first language among men was music, and that before our ideas were expressed by articulate sounds they were communicated by tones varied according to different degrees of gravity and acuteness." See an interesting discussion on this subject, by Hackel. "(Jenqr- elle Morph," B. ii, 1866, s. 246. 654 THE DESCENT OF MAN. stoned orator, bard, or musician, when with his varied tones and cadences he excites the strongest emotions in his hearers, little suspects that he uses the same means by which his half-human ancestors long ago aroused each other's ardent passions, during their courtship and rivalry. The Influence of Beauty in Determining the Marriages of Mankind. In civilized life man is largely, but by no means exclusively, influenced in the choice of bis wife by external appearance; but we are chiefly concerned with primeval times, and our only means of forming a judgment on this subject is to study the habits of existing semi- civilized and savage nations. If it can be shown that the men of different races prefer women having various char- acteristics, or conversely with the women, we have then to inquire whether such choice, continued during many gene- rations, would produce any sensible effect on the race, either on one sex or both, according to the form of inherit- ance which has prevailed. It will be well first to show in some detail that savages y the greatest attention to their personal appearance.* at they have a passion for ornament is notorious; and an English philosopher goes so far as to maintain that clothes were first made for ornament and not for warmth. As Prof. Waitz remarks: " however poor and miserable man is he finds a pleasure in adorning himself." The extrava- gance of the naked Indians of South America in decorat- ing themselves is shown " by a man of large stature gain- ing with difficulty enough by the labor of a fortnight to procure in exchange the chica necessary to paint himself red."f The ancient barbarians of Europe, during the * A full and excellent account of the manner In which savages in all parts of the world ornament themselves, is given by the Italian traveler, Prof. Mantegazza, "Rio de la Plata, Viaggi e Studi," 1867, pp. 525-545 ; all the following statements, when other refer- ences are not given, are taken from this work. See, also, Waitz, "Introduction to Anthropolog.," Eng. translat., vol. i, 1863, p. 275, et passim. Lawrence also gives very full details in his "Lectures on Physiology," 1822. Since this chapter was written Sir J. Lub- bock has published his "Origin of Civilization," 1870, in which there is an interesting chapter on the present subject, and from which (pp. 42, 48) I have taken some facts about savages dyeing their teeth and hair and piercing their teeth. f Humboldt, "Personal Narrative," Eng. translat., vol. iv, p. 515; on the imagination shown in painting the body, p. 522; on modifying the form of, the calf of the ley jp. 466. pa T SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 655 Reindeer period, brought to their caves any- brilliant or singular objects which they happened to find. Savages at the present day everywhere deck themselves with plumes, necklaces, armlets, ear-rings, etc. They paint themselves in the most diversified manner. " If painted nations," as Humbolclt observes, "had been examined with the same attention as clothed nations, it would have been perceived that the most fertile imagination and the most mutable caprice have created the fashions of painting, as well as those of garments." In one part of Africa the eyelids are colored black; in another the nails are colored yellow or purple. In many places the hair is dyed of various tints. In different coun- tries the teeth are stained black, red, blue, etc., and in the Malay Archipelago it is thought shameful to have white teeth, " like those of a dog." Not one great country can be named, from the Polar regions in the north to New Zealand in the south, in which the aborigines do not tattoo themselves. This practice was followed by the Jews of old, and by the ancient Britons. In Africa some of the natives tattoo themselves, but it is a much more common practice to raise protuberances by rubbing salt into incisions made in various parts of the body; and these are considered by the inhabitants of Kordofan and Darfur "to be great per- sonal attractions." In the Arab countries no beauty can be perfect until the cheeks " or temples have been gashed."* In South America, as Humboldt remarks, "a, mother would be accused of culpable indifference toward her children if she did not employ artificial means to shape the calf of the leg after the fashion of the country." In the Old and New Worlds the shape of the skull was formerly modified during infancy in the most extraordinary manner, as is still the case in many places, and such deformities are considered ornamental. For instance, the savages of Colombiaf deem a much flattened head " an essential point of beauty." The hair is treated with especial care in various countries; it is allowed to grow to full length, so as to reach to the ground, or is combed into "a compact frizzled mop, which * " The Nile Tributaries," 1867; " The Albert N'yanza," 1866, vol. i, p. 218. 4 Quoted by Prichard. " Pliys. Hist, of Mankind," 4th edit., vol. i, 1851, p. 331. 656 THE DESCENT OF MAN. is the Papuan's pride and glory."* In Northern Africa " a man requires a period of from eight to ten years to perfect his coiffure." With other nations the head is shaved, and in parts of South America and Africa even the eyebrows and eyelashes are eradicated. The natives of the Upper Nile knock out the four front teeth, saying that they do not wish to resemble brutes. Farther south the Batokas knock out only the two upper incisors, which, as Livingstonef remarks, gives the face a hideous appearance, owing to the prominence of the lower jaw; but these people think the presence of the incisors most unsightly, and on beholding some Europeans, cried out: " Look at the great teeth !" The chief Sebituani tried in vain to alter this fashion. In various parts of Africa and in the Malay Archipelago the natives file the incisors into points like those of a saw, or pierce them with holes, into which they insert studs. As the face with us is chiefly admired for its beauty, so with savages it is the chief seat of mutilation. In all quarters of the world the septum, and more rarely the wings of the nose are pierced; rings, sticks, feathers and other ornaments being inserted into the holes. The ears are everywhere pierced and similarly ornamented, and with the Botocudos and Lenguas of South America the hole is gradually so much enlarged that the lower edge touches the shoulder. In North and South America and in Africa either the upper or lower lip is pierced; and with the Boto- cudos the hole in the lower lip is so large that a disk of wood, four inches in diameter, is placed in it. Maiitegazza gives a curious account of the shame felt by a South American native, and of the ridicule which he excited, when he sold his tembeta the large colored piece of wood which is passed through the hole. In Central Africa the women perforate the lower lip and wear a crystal, which, from the movement of the tongue, has " a wriggling motion, indescribably ludi- crous during conversation." The wife of the chief of Latooka told Sir S. Baker, \ that Lady Baker " would be much im- proved if she would extract her four front teeth from the lower jaw and wear the long-pointed polished crystal in her *0n the Papuans, Wallace, "The Malay Archipelago," vol. ii, p. 445. On the coiffure of the Africans, Sir S. Baker, "The Albert N'yanza," vol. i, p. 210. f "Travels, "p. 533. i " The Albert N'yanza," 1866, vol. i, p. 217. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 657 under lip." Farther south with the Makalolo, the upper lip is perforated, and a large metal and bamboo ring, called apelele, is worn in the hole. " This caused the lip in one case to project two inches beyond the tip of the nose; and when the lady smiled the contraction of the muscles elevated it over the eyes. ' Why do the women wear these tilings?' the venerable chief, Chinsurdi, was asked. Evidently sur- prised at such a stupid question, he replied: ' For beauty . They are the only beautiful things women have; men have beards, women have none. What kind of a person would she be without the pelele? She would not be a woman at all with a mouth like a man, but no beard.' "* Hardly any part of the body, which can be unnaturally modified, has escaped. The amount of suffering thus caused must have been extreme, for many of the operations require several years for their completion, so that the idea of their necessity must be imperative. The motives are various; the men paint their bodies to make themselves appear terrible in battle; certain mutilations are connected with religious rites, or they mark the age of puberty, or the rank of the man, or they serve to distinguish the tribes. Among savages the same fashions prevail for long periods, f and thus mutilations, from whatever cause first made, soon come to be valued as distinctive marks. But self-adorn- ment, vanity and the admiration of others seem to be the commonest motives. In regard to tattooing, I was told by the missionaries in New Zealand that when they tried to persuade some girls to give up the practice they answered: " We must just have a few lines on our lips; else when we grow old we shall be so very ugly." With the men of New Zealand, a most capable judge J says: " To have fine tattoed faces was the great ambition of the young, both to render themselves attractive to the ladies and conspicuous in war." A star tattooed on the forehead and a spot on * Livingstone, "British Association," 1860; report given in the "Athenaeum," July 7, 1860, p. 29. - fSir-6. Baker (ibid., vol. i, p. 210) speaking of the natives of Central Africa, says: " Every tribe has a distinct and unchanging fashion for dressing the hair." See Agassiz ("Journey in Brazil," 1868, p. 318) on the invariability of the tattooing of the Amazonian Indians. JRev. R. Taylor, "New Zealand and Its Inhabitants," 1855, p. 152. 658 THE DESCENT OF MAN. the chin are thought by the women in one part of Africa to be irresistible attractions.* In most, but not all parts of the world, the men are more ornamented than the women, and often in a different manner; sometimes, though rarely, the women are hardly at all ornamented. As the women are made by savages to perform the greatest share of the work, and as they are not allowed to eat the best kinds of food, so it accords with the characteristic selfishness of man that they should not be allowed to obtain or use the finest ornaments. Lastly, it is a remarkable fact, as proved by the foregoing quotations, that the same fashions in modi- fying the shape of the head, in ornamenting the hair, in painting, tattooing, in perforating the nose, lips or ears, in removing or filing the teeth, etc., now prevail, and have long prevailed, in the most distant quarters of the world. It is extremely improbable that these practices, followed by BO many distinct nations, should be due to tradition from any common source. They indicate the close similarity of the mind of man, to whatever race he may belong, just as do the almost universal habits of dancing, masquerading and making rude pictures. Having made these preliminary remarks on the admira- tion felt by savages for various ornaments and for de- formities most unsightly in our eyes, let us see how far the men are attracted by the appearance of their women and what are their ideas of beauty. I have heard it maintained that savages are quite indifferent about the beauty of their women, valuing them solely as slaves; it may, therefore, be well to observe that this conclusion does not at all agree with the care which the women take in ornamenting them- selves, or with their vanity. Burchell f gives an amusing account of a Bush-woman who used as much grease, red ocher and shining powder ' ' as would have ruined any but a very rich husband." She displayed also " much vanity and too evident a consciousness of her superiority." Mr. Winwood Reade informs me that the negroes of the West Coast often discuss the beauty of their women. Some competent observers have attributed the fearfully common practice of infanticide partly to the desire felt by the * Mantegazza, " Viaggi e Studi," p. 543. \ "Travels in S. Africa," 1824, vol. i, p. 414. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 659 women to retain their good looks.* In several regions the women wear charms and use love-philters to gain the affec- tions of the men; and Mr. Brown enumerates four plants used for this purpose by the women of Northwestern America, f Beanie,]; an excellent observer, who lived many years with the American Indians, says, in speaking of the women: " Ask a Northern Indian what is beauty, and he will answer, a broad fiat face, small eyes, high cheek-bones, three or four broad black lines across each cheek, a low forehead, a large broad chin, a clumsy hook nose, a tawny hide and breasts hanging down to the belt." Pallas, who visited the northern parts of the Chinese empire, says: " Those women are preferred who have the Mandschu form; that is to say, a broad face, high cheek-bones, very broad noses, and enormous ears;" and Vogt remarks that the obliquity of the eye, which is proper to the Chinese and Japanese, is exaggerated in their pictures for the pur- pose, as it " seems, of exhibiting its beauty, as contrasted with the eye of the red-haired barbarians." It is well known, as Hue repeatedly remarks, that the Chinese of the interior think Europeans hideous, with their white skins and prominent noses. The nose is far from being too prominent, according to our ideas, in the natives of Ceylon; yet "the Chinese in the seventh century, accus- tomed to the fiat features of the Mongol races, were sur- prised at the prominent noses of the Cingalese; and Thsang described them as having * the beak of a bird, with the body of a man/" Finlayson, after minutely describing the people of Cochin China, says that their rounded heads and faces are their chief characteristics; and, he adds, "the roundness of the whole countenance is more striking in the women, *See for references, Gerland " Ueber das Aussterben der Natur- vSlker," 1868, ss. 51, 53, 55; also Azara, "Voyages," etc., torn, ii, p. 116. f On* the vegetable productions used by the Northwestern Ameri- can Indians, " Pharmaceutical Journal," vol. x. J " A Journey from Prince of Wales Fort," 8vo. edit., 1796, p. 89. Quoted by Prichard, " Phys. Hist, of Mankind," 3d edit., vol. iv, 1844, p. 519; 'Vogt, " Lectures on Man," Eng. translat. p. 129. On the opinion of the Chinese on the Cingalese, E. Tennent, "Ceylon," 1859, vol. ii, p. 107. 660 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. who are reckoned beautiful in proportion as they display this form of face." The Siamese have small noses with divergent nostrils, a wide mouth, rather thick lips, a remarkably large face, with very high and broad cheek- bones. It is, therefore, not wonderful that "beauty, according to our notion, is a stranger to them. Yet they consider their own females to be much more beautiful than those of Europe." * It is well known that with many Hottentot women the posterior part of the body projects in a wonderful manner; they are steatopygous; and Sir Andrew Smith is certain that this peculiarity is greatly admired by the men. f He once saw a woman who was considered a beauty, and she was so immensely developed behind that when seated on level ground she could not rise, and had to push herself along until she came to a slope. Some of the women in various negro tribes have the same peculiarity; and, accord- ing to Burton, the Somal men " are said to choose their wives by ranging them in a line and by picking her out who projects farthest a tergo. Nothing can be more hate- ful to a negro than the opposite form."J With respect to color, the negroes railed Mungo Park on the whiteness of his skin and the prominence of his nose, both of which they considered as "unsightly and unnatural conformations." He in return praised the glossy jet of their skins and the lovely depression of their noses; this they said was " honeymoutli," nevertheless they gave him food. The African Moors, also, "knitted their brows and seemed to shudder " at the whiteness of his skin. On the eastern coast the negro boys Avhen they saw Burton, cried out: " Look at the white man; does he not look like a white ape?" On the western coast, as Mr. Winwood Reade informs me, the negroes admire a very black skin more than one of a lighter tint. But their horror of *Prichard, as taken from Crawfurd and Finlayson, "Phys. Hist, of Mankind," vol. iv, pp. 534, 535. f Idem illustrissirnus viator dixit rnihi prsecinctorium vel tabulam freminae, quod nobis teterriinum est, quondam permagno aestimari ab hominibus in hac gente. Nunc res mutata est, et censent talem con- formationem inininie optandam esse. f'The Anthropological Review," Nov., 1864, p. 237. For addi- tional reference, see Waitz, " Introduct. to Anthropology," Eng. translat., 1863, vol. i, p. 105. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 661 whiteness may be attributed, according to this same traveler, partly to the belief held by most negroes that demons and spirits are white, and partly to their thinking it a sign of ill-health. The Banyai of the more southern part of the continent are negroes, but "a great many of them are of a light coffee-and-milk color, and, indeed, this color is considered handsome throughout the whole country;" so that here we have a different standard of taste. "NYith the Kafirs, who differ much from negroes, " the skin, except among the tribes near Delagoa Bay, is not usually black, the prevail- ing color being a mixture of black and red, the most common shade being chocolate. Dark complexions as being most common are naturally held in the highest esteem. To be told that he is light colored or like a white man would be deemed a very poor compliment by a Kafir. I have heard of one unfortunate man who was^o very fair that no girl would marry him." One of the titles of the Zulu king is: "You who are black."* Mr. Galton, in speaking to me about the natives of S. Africa, remarked that their ideas of beauty seem very different from ours; for in one tribe two slim, slight and pretty girls were not admired by the natives. Turning to other quarters of the world: in Java a yellow, not a white girl, is considered, according to Madame Pfeiffer, a beauty. A man of Cochin China " spoke with contempt of the wife of the English ambassador, that she had white teeth like a dog and a rosy color like that of potato flowers." We have seen that the Chinese dislike our white skin and that the North Americans admire " a tawny hide." In South America the Yuracaras, who inhabit the wooded, damp slopes of the eastern Cordillera, are remarkably pale colored, as their name in their own language expresses; nevertheless, they consider European women as very inferior to their own.f *Mungo Park's " Travels in Africa," 4to., 1816, pp. 53, 131. Bur- ton's statement is quoted by Schaaffhausen, ' ' Archiv. f iir Anthro- polog.," 1866, s. 163. On the Banyai, Livingstone, "Travels," p. 64. On the Kafirs, the Rev. J. Schooter, " The Kafirs of Natal and the Zulu Country," 1857, p. 1. fFor the Javans and Cochin-Chinese, see Waitz, " Introduct. to Anthropology," Eng. translat., vol. i, p. 305. On the Yuracaras, A. d'Orbigny, as quoted in Prichard, "Phys. Hist, of Mankind," vol. v, 3d edit., p. 476. 662 THE DESCENT OF MAN, In several of the tribes of North America the hair on the head grows to a wonderful length; and Catlin gives a curious proof how much this is esteemed, for the chief of the Crows was elected to this office from having the longest hair of any man in the tribe; namely, ten feet and seven Inches. The Aymaras and Quichuas of South America likewise have very long hair; and this, as Mr. D. Forbea informs me, is so much valued as a beauty, that cutting it off was the severest punishment which he could inflict on them. In both the northern and southern halves of the continent the natives sometimes increase the apparent length of their hair by weaving into it fibrous substances. Although the hair on the head is thus cherished, that on the face is considered by the North American Indians " as very vulgar/' and every hair is carefully eradicated. This practice prevails throughout the American continent from Vancouver'* Island in the north to Terra del Fuego in the south. When York Minster, a Fuegian on board the " Beagle," was taken back to his country, the natives told him he ought to pull out the few short hairs on his face. They also threatened a young missionary, who was left for a time with them, to strip him naked and pluck the hairs from his face and body, yet he was far from being a hairy man. This fashion is carried so far that the Indians of Paraguay eradicate their eyebrows and eyelashes, saying that they do not wish to be like horses.* It is remarkable that throughput the world the races which are almost completely destitute of a beard dislike hairs on the face and body, and take paina to eradicate them. The Kalmucks are beardless and they are well known, like the Americans, to pluck out all straggling hairs ; and so it is with the Polynesians, some of the Malays and the Siamese. Mr. Veitch states that the Japanese ladies " all objected to our whiskers, considering them very ugly, and told us to cut them off and be like Japanese men." The New Zealanders have short, curled beards; yet they formerly plucked out the hairs on the face. They had a saying that " there is no woman for a hairy man;" but it would appear that the fashion has * " North American Indians," by G. Catlin, 3d edit. 1842, vol. i, p. 49; vol. ii. p. 227. On the nativesof Vancouver's Island, see Sproat, " Scenes and Studies of Savage Life," 1868, p. 25. On the Indians of Paraguay, Azara, "Voyages," torn, ii, p. 105. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 663 changed in New Zealand, perhaps owing to the presence of Europeans, and I am assured that beards are now admired by the Maories."* On the other hand, bearded races admire and greatly value their beards; among the Anglo-Saxons every part of the body had a recognized value; " the loss of the beard being estimated at twenty shillings, while the breaking of a thigh was fixed at only twelve, "f In the east men swear solemnly by their beards. We have seen that Chinsurdi, the chief of the Makalolo in Africa, thought that beards were a great ornament. In the Pacific the Fijian's beard is " profuse and bushy, and is his greatest pride;" while the inhabitants of the adjacent archipelagoes of Tonga and Samoa are beardless and abhor a rough chin." In one island alone of the Ellice group "the men are heavily bearded, and not a little proud thereof. " J We thus see how widely the different races of man differ in their taste for the beautiful. In every nation sufficiently advanced to have made effigies of their gods or of their deified rulers, the sculptors no doubt have endeavored to ex- press their highest ideal of beauty and grandeur. Under this point of view it is well to compare in our mind the Jupiter or Apollo of the Greeks with the Egyptian or Assyrian statues; and these with the hideous bas-reliefs on the ruined buildings of Central America. I have met with very few statements opposed to this conclusion. Mr. Winwood Reade, however, who has had ample opportunities for observation, not only with the negroes of the west coast of Africa, but with those of the interior who have never associated with Europeans, is con- vinced that their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours; and Dr. Rohlfs writes to me to the same effect * On the Siamese, Prickard, ibid, vol. iv, p. 533. On the Japanese, Veitch in " Gardeners' Chronicle," 1860, p. 1104. On the New Zeal- anders, Mantegazza, " Viaggi e Studi," 1867, p. 526. For the other nations mentioned, see references in Lawrence, " Lectures on Physi- ology," etc., 1822, p. 272. ,fLubbeck, "Origin of Civilization," 1870, p. 321. \ Dr . Barnard Davis quotes Mr. Prichard and others for these facts in regard to the Polynesians, in "Anthropological Review," April, 1870, pp. 185, 191. Ch. Comte has remarks to this effect in his"Traite de Legisla- tion," 3d edit., 1887, p. 136. $64 THE DESCENT OF MAN. with respect to Borneo and the countries inhabited by the Pullo tribes* Mr. Keade found that he agreed with the negroes in their estimation of the beauty of the native girls; and that their appreciation of the beauty of European women corresponded with ours. They admire long hair, and use artificial means to make it appear abundant; they admire also a beard, though themselves very scantily pro- vided. Mi% Keade feels doubtful what kind of nose is most appreciated; a girl has been heard to say: " I do not want to marry him, he has got no nose;" and this shows that a very fiat nose is not admired. We should, however, bear in mind that the depressed, broad noses and projecting jaws of the negroes of the west coast are exceptional types with the inhabitants of Africa. Notwithstanding the fore- going statements, Mr. Keade admits that negroes " do not like the color of our skin; they look on blue eyes with aver- sion, and they think our noses too long and our lips too thin." He does not think it probable that negroes would ever prefer the most beautiful European woman, on the mere grounds of physical admiration, to a good-looking negress.* The general truth of the principle, long ago insisted on by Humboldt,f that man admires and often tries to exag- gerate whatever characters nature may have given him, is shown in many ways. The practice of beardless races extirpating every trace of a beard, and often all the hairs on the body, affords one illustration. The skull has been greatly modified during ancient and modern times by many nations; and there can be little doubt that this has been practiced, especially in North and South America, in order *The "African Sketch-book," vol. ii, 1873, pp. 253, 394, 521. The Fuegians, as I have been informed by a missionary who long resided with them, consider European women as extremely beautiful ; America, I cannot but think that this must be a mistake, unless indeed the statement refers to the few Fuegians who have lived for some time with Europeans, and who must consider us as superior beings. I should add that a most experienced observer, Capt. Bur- ton , believes that a woman whom we consider beautiful is admired throughout the world. " Anthropological Review," March, 1864, p. f" Personal Narrative," Eng. translat., vol. iv, p. 518, and else- where. Mantegazza, in his " Viaggi e Studi," strongly insists on this same principle. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 665 to exaggerate some natural and admired peculiarity. Many American Indians are known to admire a head so extremely flattened as to appear to us idiotic. The natives on the northwestern coast compress the head into a pointed cone; and it is their constant practice to gather the hair into a knot on the top of the head, for the sake, as Dr. Wilson remarks, "of increasing the apparent elevation of the favorite conoid form." The inhabitants of Arakhan " admire a broad, smooth forehead, and, in order to pro- duce it, they fasten a plate of lead on the heads of the new-born children." On the other band, ''abroad, well- rounded occiput is considered a great beauty" by the natives of the Fiji Islands.* As with the skuJ, so with the nose; the ancient Huiis, during the age of Attila, were accustomed to flatten the noses of their infants with bandages, "for the sake of exaggerating a natural conformation." With the Tahitians, to be called long-nose is considered as an insult, and they compress the noses and foreheads of their children for the sake of beauty. The same holds with the Malays of Sumatra, the Hottentots, certain negroes and the natives of Brazil, f The Chinese have by nature unusually small feet; \ and it is well known that the women of the upper classes distort their feet to make them still smaller. Lastly, Humboldt thinks that the American Indians prefer coloring their bodies with red paint in order to exaggerate their natural tint; and until recently European women added to their naturally bright colors by rouge and white cosmetics ; but it may be doubted whether barbarous nations have generally had any such intention in paint- ing themselves. * On the skulls of the American tribes, see Nott and Qliddon, " Types of Mankind," 1854, p. 440; Prichard, " Phys. Hist, of Man- kind," vol. i, 3d edit., p. 321 ; on the natives of Arakhan, ibid, vol. iv, p. 537. Wilson, " Physical Ethnology," Smithsonian Institution, 1863, p. 288; on the Fijians, p. 290. Sir J. Lubbock ("Prehistoric Times," 3d edit., 1869, p. 506) gives an excellent resume on this sub- ject. f On the Huns, Godron, " De 1'Espece," torn, ii, 1859, p. 300. On the Tahitians, Waitz, " Anthropolog.," Eng. translat., vol. i, p. 305. Marsden, quoted by Prichard, " Phys. Hist, of Mankind," 3d edit, vol. v, p. 67. Lawrence, " Lectures on Physiology." p. 337. IThis fact was ascertained in the " Reise der Novara : Anthropo- log. Thiel," Dr. Weisbach, 18W, . 3S5. 666 THE DESCENT OF MAN. In the fashions of our own dress we see exactly the same principle and the same desire to carry every point to an extreme; we exhibit, also, the same spirit of emulation. But the fashions of savages are far more permanent than ours; and whenever their bodies are artificially modified, this is necessarily the case. The Arab women of the Upper Nile occupy about three days in dressing their hair; they never imitate other tribes, " but simply vie with each other in the superlativeness of their own style." Dr. Wilson, in speaking of the compressed skulls of various American races, adds, "such usages are among the least eradicable, and long survive the shock of revolutions that change dynasties and efface more important national peculiarities."* The same principle comes into play in the art of breeding; and we can thus understand, as I have elsewhere explained,! the wonderful development of the many races of animals and plants, which have been kept merely for ornament. Fanciers always wish each character to be somewhat increased; they do not admire a medium standard; they cer- tainly do not desire any great and abrupt change in the character of their breeds; they admire solely what they are accustomed to, but they ardently desire to see each char- acteristic feature a little more developed. The senses of man and of the lower animaicj seem to be so constituted that brilliant colors and certain forms, as well as harmonious and rhythmical sounds, give pleasure and are called beautiful; but why this should be so we know not. It is certainly not true that there is in the mind of man any universal standard of beauty with respect to the human body. It is, however, possible that certain tastes may in the course of time become inherited, though there is no evidence in favor of this belief; and, if so, each race would possess its own innate ideal standard of beauty. It has been argued J that ugliness consists in an approach to the structure of the lower animals, and no doubt this is partly true with the more civilized nations, in which intellect is highly appreciated; but this explana- *" Smithsonian Institution," 1863, p. 289. On the fashions of Arab women, Sir S. Baker, " The Nile Tributaries," 1867, p. 121. \ "The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. i, p. 214; vol. ii, p. 240. J Schaaffhausen, " Archiv. fiir Anthropologie," 1866, s. 164. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 667 tion will hardly apply to all forms of ugliness. The men of each race prefer what they are accustomed to; they carttiot endure any great change; but they like variety, and admire each characteristic carried to a moderate extreme.* Men accustomed to a nearly oval face, to straight and regular features and to bright colors, admire, as we Euro- peans know, these points when strongly developed. On the other hand, men accustomed to a broad face, with high cheek-bones, a depressed nose and a black skin admire these peculiarities when strongly marked. No doubt characters of all kinds may be too much developed for beauty. Hence a perfect beauty, which implies many characters modified in a particular manner, will be in every race a prodigy. As the great anatomist Bichat long ago said, if every one were cast in the same mold there would be no such thing as beauty. If all our women were to become as beautiful as the Venus de Medici we should for a time be charmed, but we should soon wish for variety; and, as soon as we had obtained variety, we should wish to see certain characters a little exaggerated beyond the then existing common standard. *Mr. Bain has collected (" Mental and Moral Science," 1868, pp. 804-314) about a dozen more or less different theories of the idea of beauty; but none are quite the same as that here given. 66fc THE DESCENT OF MAN. CHAPTER XX. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHAEACTERS OP MAN Continued. On the effects of the continued selection of women according to a different standard of beauty in each race On the causes which interfere with sexual selection in civilized and savage nations Conditions favorable to sexual selection during primeval times On the manner of action of sexual selection with mankind On the women in savage tribes having some power to choose their husbands Absence of hair on the body and development of the beard Color of the skin Summary. WE have seen in the last chapter that with all barbarous races ornaments, dress and external appearance are highly valued; and that the men judge of the beauty of their women by widely different standards. We must next inquire whether this preference and the consequent selec- tion, during many generations, of those women which appear to the men of each race the most attractive, has altered the character either of the females alone, or of both sexes. With mammals the general rule appears to be that characters of all kinds are inherited equally by the males and females; we might, therefore, expect that with man- kind any characters gained by the females or by the males through sexual selection would commonly be transferred to the offspring of both sexes. If any change has thus been effected it is almost certain that the different races would be differently jiodined, as each has its own standard of beauty. With mankind, especially with savages, many causes interfere with the action of sexual selection as far as the bodily frame is concerned. Civilized men are largely attracted by the mental charms of women, by their wealth, and especially by their social position; for men rarely marry into a much lower rank. The men who succeed in obtaining the more beautiful women will not have a better chance of leaving a long Une of descendants than othe.r SECONDARY SEXUAL CHAR AC! ER8. 669 men with plainer wives, save the few who bequeath their fortunes according to primogeniture. With respect to the opposite form of selection, namely, of the more attractive men by the women, although in civilized nations women have free or almost free choice, which is not the case with barbarous races, yet their choice is largely influenced by the social position and wealth of the men; and the success of the latter in life depends much on their intellectual powers and energy, or on the fruits of these same powers in their forefathers. No excuse is needed for treating this subject in some detail; for, as the German philosopher Schopenhauer remarks, " the final aim of all love intrigues, be they comic or tragic, is really of more importance than all other ends in human life. What it all turns upon is nothing less than the composition of the next genera- tion. . . . It is not the weal or woe of any one indi- vidual, but that of the human race to come, which is here at stake. "* There is, however, reason to believe that in certain civil- ized and semi-civilized nations sexual selection has effected something in modifying the bodily frame of some of the members. Many persons are convinced, as it^appears to me with justice, that our aristocracy, including under this term all wealthy families in which primogeniture has long prevailed, from having chosen during many generations from all classes the more beautiful women as their wives, have become handsomer, according to the European standard, than the middle classes; yet the middle classes are placed under equally favorable conditions of life for the perfect development of the body. Cook remarks that the superiority in personal appearance ' ' which is observa- ble in the erees or nobles in all the other islands (of the Pacific) is found in the Sandwich Islands " but this may be chiefly due to their better food and manner of life. The old traveler Chardin, in describing the Persians, says their " blood is now highly refined by frequent inter- mixtures with the Georgians and Circassians, two nations which surpass all the world in personal beauty. There is hardly a man of rank in Persia who is not born of a * " Schopenhauer and Darwinism," in "Journal of Anthropology. * Jan., 1871, p. 333. 670 TEE DESCENT OF MAN Georgian or Circassian mother." He adds that they inherit their beauty, " not from their ancestors, for without the above mixture the men of rank in Persia, who are descend- ants of the Tartars, would be extremely ugly."* Here is a more curious case; the priestesses who attended the temple of V^enus Erycina at San Giuliano, in Sicily, were selected for their beauty out of the whole of Greece; they were not vestal virgins, and Qua fcref ages, f who states the foregoing fact, says that the women of San Giuliano are now famous as the most beautiful in the island, and are sought by artists as models. But it is obvious that the evidence in all the above cases is doubtful. The following case, though relating to savages, is well worth giving from its curiosity. Mr. Winwood Reade in- forms me that the Jollofs, a tribe of negroes on the west coast of Africa, "are remarkable for their uniformly fine appearance." A friend of his asked one of these men: " How is it that every one whom I meet is so fine looking, not only your men, but your women?" The Jollof an- swered: "It is very easily explained; it has always been our custom to pick out our worst-looking slaves and to sell them." It need hardly be added that with all savages female slaves serve as concubines. That this negro should have attributed, whether rightly or wrongly, the fine appearance of his tribe to the long-continued elimination of the ugly women is not so surprising as it may at first appear: for I have elsewhere shownj that negroes fully appreciate the importance of selection in the breeding of their domestic animals, and I could give from Mr. Eeade additional evidence on this head. The Causes Which Prevent or Check the Action of Sexual Selection with Savages. The chief causes are, first so- called communal marriages or promiscuous intercourse ; secondly, the consequences of female infanticide; thirdly, * These quotations are taken from Lawrence (" Lectures on Physi- ology," etc., 1822, p. 393), who attributes the beauty of the upper classes in England to the men having long selected the more beau- tiful women. f " Anthropologie," "Revue des Cours Scientifique," Oct., 1868, p. 721. J"The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. i, p. 207. SECONDARY JEXUAL CHARACTERS. 671 early betrothals; and, lastly, the low estimation in which women are held as mere slaves. These four points must be considered rn some detail. It is obvious that as long as the pairing of man or of any other animal is left to mere chance, with no choice exerted by either sex, there can be no sexual selection; and no effect will be produced on the offspring by certain indi- viduals having had an advantage over others in their court- ship. Now, it is asserted that there exist at the present day tribes which practice what Sir J. Lubbock by courtesy calls communal marriages; that is, all the men and women in the tribe are husbands and wives to one another. The licentiousness of many savages is no doubt astonishing, but it seems to me that more evidence is requisite, before we fully admit that their intercourse is in any case promiscu- ous. Nevertheless, all those who have most closely studied the subject,* and whose judgment is worth much more than mine, believe that communal marriage (this ex- pression being variously guarded) was the original and universal form throughout the world, including therein the intermarriage of brothers and sisters. The late Sir A. Smith, who had traveled widely in S. Africa, and knew much about the habits of savages there and elsewhere, expressed to me the strongest opinion that no race exists in which woman is considered as the property of the community. I believe that his judg- ment was largely determined by what is implied by the term marriage. Throughout the following discussion I use the term in the same sense as when naturalists speak of animals as monogamous, meaning thereby that the male is accepted by or chooses a single female, and lives with her *Sir J. Lubbock, " The Origin of Civilization," 1870, chap, iii, especially pp. 60-67. Mr. M'Lennan, in his extremely valuable work on " Primitive Marriage," 1865, p. 163, speaks of the union of the sexes "in the earliest times as loose, transitory, and in some degree promiscuous." Mr. M'Lennan and Sir J. Lubbock have col- lected much evidence on the extreme licentiousness of savages at the present time. Mr. L. H. Morgan, in his interesting memoir on the classificatory system of relationship (" Proc. American Acad. of Sciences," vol. vii, Feb., 1868, p. 475), concludes that polygamy and all forms of marriage during primeval times were essentially unknown. It appears, also, from" Sir J. Lubbock's work, that Bach- ofen likewise believes that communal intercourse originally pre- vailed. 672 TEE DESCENT OF MAN. either during the breeding -season or for the whole year, keeping possession of her by the law of might; or, as when they speak of a polygamous species, meaning- that the male Jives with several females. This kind of marriage is all that concerns us here, as it suffices for the w r ork of sexual selection. But I know that some cf the writers above referred to imply by the term marriage a recognized right protected by the tribe. The indirect evidence in favor of the belief of the former prevalence of communal marriages is strong, and rests chiefly on the terms of relationship which are employed between the members of the same tribe, implying a con- nection with the tribe, and not, with either parent. But the subject is too large and complex for even an abstract to be here given, and I will confine myself to a few remarks. It is evident in the case of such marriages, or where the mar- riage tie is very loose, that the relationship of the child to its father cannot be known. But it seems almost incredible that the relationship of the child to it* mother should ever be completely ignored, especially as the women in most savage tribes nurse their infants for a long time. Accord- ingly, in many cases the lines of descent are traced through the mother alone, to the exclusion of the father. But in other cases the terms employed express a connection with the tribe alone, to the exclusion even of the mother. It seems possible that the connection between the related members of the same barbarous tribe, exposed to all sorts of danger, might be so much more important, owing to the need of mutual protection and aid, than that between the mother and her child, as to lead to the sole use of terms expressive of the former relationships; but Mr. Morgan is convinced that this view is by no means sufficient. The terms of relationship used in different parts of the world may be divided, according to the author just quoted, into two great classes the classificatory and descriptive the latter being employed by us. It is the classificatory system which so strongly leads to the belief that communal and other extremely loose forms of marriage were originally universal. But, as far as I can see, there is no necessity on this ground for believing in absolutely promiscuous inter- course; and I am glad to find that this is Sir J. .Lubbock's view. Men and women, like many of the lower animals, might formerly have entered into strict though temporary SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 673 unions for each birth, and in this case nearly as much con- fusion would have arisen in the terms of relationship as in the case of promiscuous intercourse. As far as sexual selection is concerned all that is required is that choice should be exerted before the parents unite, and it signifies little whether the unions last for life or only for a season. Besides the evidence derived from the terms of relation- ship, other lines of reasoning indicate the former wide prev- alence of communal marriage. Sir J. Lubbock accounts for the strange and widely extended habit of exogamy that is, the men of one tribe taking Avives from a distinct tribe by communism having been the original form of intercourse; so that a man never obtained a wife for him- self unless he captured her from a neighboring and hostile tribe, and then she would naturally have become his sole and valuable property. Thus the practice of capturing wives might have arisen; and from the honor so gained it might ultimately have become the universal habit. Ac- cording to Sir J. Lubbock,* we can also thus understand " the necessity of expiation for marriage as sei infringe- ment of tribal rites, since, according to old ideas, a man had no right to appropriate to himself that which belonged to the whole tribe." Sir J. Lubbock further gives a curious body of facts showing that in old times high honor was bestowed on women who were utterly licentious; and this, as he explains, is intelligible, if we admit that pro- miscuous intercourse was the aboriginal, and therefore long revered custom of the tribe, f Although the manner of development of tlie marriage- tie is an obscure subject, as we may infer from the diver- gent opinions on several points between the three author/ who have studied it most closely, namely, Mr. Morgan, Mr. M'Lennan, and Sir J. Lubbock, yet from the fore- going and several other lines of evidence it seems probable J * " Address to British Association on the Social and Religious Con- dition of the Lower Races of Man," 1870, p. 20. f " Origin of Civilization," 1870, p. 86. In the several works above quoted, there will be found copious evidence on relationship throug?,. the females alone, or with the tribe alone. JMr. C. Staniland Wake argues strongly (" Anthropologie,** March, 1874, p. 197) against the views held by these three writerr. on the former prevalence of almost promiscuous intercourse; and he thinks that the classificatory system of relationship can be ctliej wise explained. 674 THE DESCENT OF MAN. that the habit of marriage, in any strict sense of the word, has been gradually developed; and that almost promiscu- ous or very loose intercourse was once extremely common throughout the world. Nevertheless, from the strength of the feeling of jealousy all through the animal kingdom, as well as from the analogy of the lower animals, more partic- ularly of those which come nearest to man, I cannot believe that absolutely promiscuous intercourse prevailed in times past, shortly before man attained to his present rank in the zoological scale. Man, as I have attempted to show 5 is certainly descended from some ape-like creature. With the existing Quadrumaua, as far as their habits are known, the males of some species are monogamous, but live during only a part of the year with the females; of this the orang seems to afford an instance. Several kinds, for example some of the Indian and American monkeys, are strictly monogamous, and associate all the year round with their wives. Others are polygamous, for example the gorilla and several American species, and each family lives sepa- rate. Even when this occurs, the families inhabiting the same district are probably somewhat social ; the chimpanzee, for instance, is occasionally met with in large bands. Again, other species are polygamous, but several males, each with his own females, live associated in a body, as with several species of baboons.* We may indeed conclude from what we know of the jealousy of all male quadrupeds armed, as many of them are, with special weapons for bat- tling with their rivals, that promiscuous intercourse in a state of nature is extremely improbable. The pairing may not last for life, but only for each birth; yet if the males which are the strongest and best able to defend or other- wise assist their females and young, were to select the more attractive females, this would suffice for sexual selection. Therefore, looking far enough back in the stream of time, and, judging from the social habits of man as he now exists, the most probable view is that he aboriginally lived in small communities, each with a single wife, or if power- ful with several, whom he jealously guarded against all *Brehm ("Illust. Thierleben," B. i, p. 77) says Cynocephalut hamadryas lives in great troops containing twice as many adult females as adult males. See Rengger on American polygamous species, and Owen (" Anat. of' Vertebrates," vol. iii, p. 746) on Amer- ican monogamous species. Other references might be added. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 675 other men, Jr he may not have been a social animal, and yet have lived with several wives, like the gorilla; for all the natives "agree that but one adult male is seen in a band; when the young male grows up a contest takes place for mastery, and the strongest, by killing and driving out the others, establishes himself as the head of the com- munity."* The younger males, being thus .expelled and wandering about, would, when at last successful in finding a partner, prevent too close interbreeding within the limits of the same family. Although savages are now extremely licentious, and, although communal marriages may formerly have largely prevailed, yet many tribes practice some form of marriage, but of a far more lax nature than that of civilized nations. Polygamy, as just stated, is almost universally followed by the leading men in every tribe. Nevertheless there are tribes, standing almost at the bottom of the scale, Avhich are strictly monogamous. This is the case with the Veddahs of Ceylon; they have a saying, according to Sir J. Lub- bock,f " that death alone can separate husband and wife." An intelligent Kandyan chief, of course a polygamist, " was perfectly scandalized at the utter barbarism of living with only one wife, and never parting until separated by death/ 7 " It was," he said, " just like the Wanderoo mon- keys." Whether savages who now enter into some form of marriage, either polygamous or monogamous, have re- tained this habit from primeval times, or whether they have returned to some form of marriage, after passing through a stage of promiscuous intercourse, I will not pretend to conjecture. Infanticide. This practice is now very common through-? out the world, and there is reason to believe that it pre> vailed much more extensively during former times. J Bar- barians find it difficult to support themselves and their children, and it is a simple plan to kill their infants. In South America some tribes, according to Azara, formerly *Dr. Savage, in "Boston Journal of Nat. Hist.," vol. v, 1846-47, p. 423. f'PreWstorie Times," 1869, p. 424. JMr. M'Lennan, "Primitive Marriage," 1865. See especially on Kogamy and infanticide up. 130- 18J* "*65. 676 THE DESCENT OF MAN. destroyed so many infants of both sexes that they were on the point of extinction. In the Polynesian Islands women have been known to kill from four or five, to even ten of their children; and Ellis could not find a single woman who had not killed at least one. In a village on the eastern frontier of India Col. McCullpch found not a single female child. Wherever infanticide * prevails the struggle for existence will be in so far less severe, and all the members of the tribe will have an almost equally good chance of rearing their few surviving children. In most cases a larger number of female than of male infants are destroyed, for it is obvious that the latter are of more value to the tribe, as they will, when grown up, aid in defending it, and can support themselves. But the trouble experienced by the women in rearing children, their consequent loss of beauty, the higher estimation set on them when few, -and their happier fate, are assigned by the women them- selves, and by various observers, as additional motives for infanticide. When, owing to female infanticide, the women of a tribe were few, the habit of capturing wives from neighboring tribes would naturally arise. Sir J. Lubbock, however, as we have seen, attributes the practice in chief part to the former existence of communal marriage, and to the men having consequently captured women from other tribes to hold as their sole property. Additional causes might be assigned, such as the communities being very small, in which case, marriageable women would often be deficient. That the habit was most extensively practiced during former times, even by the ancestors of civilized nations, is clearly shown by the preservation of many curious customs and ceremonies, of which Mr. McLennan has given an interesting account. In our own marriages the "best man " seems originally to have been the chief abettor of the bridegroom in the act of capture. Now, as long as men habitually procured their wives through violence and *Pr. Gerland("Ueber das Aussterben der NaturvOlker," 1808) has collected much information on infanticide, see especially ss. 27, 61, 54. Azara (" Voyages," etc., torn, ii, pp. 94, 116) enters in detail on the motives. See also M'Lennan (ibid, p. 139) for cases in India. In the former reprints of the 2d edition of this book an incorrect quotation from Sir G. Grey was unfortunately given in the above passage and has now been removed from the text. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 677 craft, they would have been glad to seize on any woman, and would not have selected the more attractive ones. But as soon as the practice of procuring wives from a distinct tribe was effected through barter, as now occurs in many places, the more attractive women would generally have been purchased. The incessant crossing, however, between tribe and tribe, which necessarily follows from any form of this habit, would tend to keep all the people inhabiting the same country nearly uniform in character; and this would interfere with the power of sexual selection in differentiat- ing the tribes. The scarcity of women, consequent on female infanti- cide, leads, also, to another practice, that of polyandry, still common in several parts of the world, and which formerly, as Mr. McLennan believes, prevailed almost uni- versally; but this latter conclusion is doubted by Mr. Morgan and Sir J. Lubbock.* Whenever two or more men are compelled to marry one women it is certain that all the women of the tribe will get married, and there will be no selection by the men of the more attractive women. But, under these circumstances, the women no doubt will have the power of choice, and will prefer the more attractive men. Azara, f or instance, describes how carefully a Guana woman bargains for all sorts of privileges before accepting some one or more husbands; and the men in consequence take unusual care of their personal appearance. So among the Todas of India, who practice polyandry, the girls can accept or refuse any man. f A very ugly man in these cases would, perhaps, altogether fail in getting a wife, or get one later in life; but the handsomer men, although more successful in obtaining wives, would not, as far as we can see, leave more offspring to inherit their beauty than the less handsome husbands of the same women. Early Betrothals and Slavery of Women. With many savages it is the custom to betroth the females while mere infants ; and this would effectually prevent preference * "Primitive Marriage," p. 208; Sir J. Lubbock, "Origin of Civili- zation," p. 100. See also Mr. Morgan, loc. cit., on the former preva- lence of polyandry. f Azara, "Voyages," etc., torn, ii, pp. 92-95, Colonel Marshall " Among the Todas," p. 212. 678 THE DESCENT OF MAN. being exerted on either side according to personal appear- ance. But it would not prevent the more attractive women from being afterward stolen or taken by force from their husbands by the more powerful men; and this often hap- pens in Australia, America and elsewhere. The same con- sequences with reference to sexual selection would to a certain extent follow, when women are valued almost solely as slaves or beasts of burden, as is the case with many savages. The men, however, at all times would prefer the handsomest slaves, according to their standard of beauty. We thus see that several customs prevail with savages which must greatly interfere with, or completely stop, the action of sexual selection. On the other hand, the con- ditions of life to which savages are exposed, and some of their habits, are favorable to natural selection; and this comes into play at the same time with sexual selection. Savages are known to suffer severely from recurrent famines; they do not increase their food by artificial means; they rarely refrain from marriage,* and generally marry while young. Consequently they must be subjected to occasional hard struggles for existence, and the favored individuals will alone survive. At a very early period, before man attained to his present rank in the scale, many of his conditions would be differ- ent from what now obtains among savages. Judging from the analogy of the lower animals, he would then either live with a single female, or be a polygamist. The most pow- erful and able males would succeed best in obtaining attrac- tive females. They would also succeed best in the general struggle for life, and in defending their females, as well as their offspring, from enemies of all kinds. At this early period the ancestors of man would not be sufficiently ad- vanced in intellect to look forward to distant contingencies; they would not foresee that the rearing of their children, especially their female children, would make the struggle for life severer for the tribe. They would be governed more by their instincts and less by their reason than are Burchell says ("Travels in S. Africa," vol. ii, 1824, p. 58), that among the wild nations of Southern Africa, neither rnen nor women ever pass their lives in a state of celibacy. Azara (" Voyages dans 1'Amerique Merid.," torn, ii, 1809, p. 21) makes precisely the same remark in regard to the wild Indians of South America. . SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 679 savages at the present day. They would not at that period have partially lost one of the strongest of all instincts common to all lower animals, namely, tho love of their young offspring; and consequently they would not have practiced female infanticide. Women would not have been thus rendered scarce, and polyandry wo-ild not have been practiced; for hardly any other cause except the scarcity of women seems sufficient to break down the nat- ural and widely prevalent feeling of jealousy and the desire of each male to possess a female for himself. Polyandry would be a natural stepping-stone to communal marriages or almost promiscuous intercourse; though the best authori- ties believe that this latter habit preceded polyandry. During primordial times there would be no early betroth- als, for this implies foresight. Nor would women be valued merely as useful slaves or beasts of burden. Both sexes, if the females as well as the males were peronited to exert any choice, would choose their partners not for mental charms, or property, or social position, but almost solely from external appearance. All the adults would rnarry or pair, and all the offspring, as far as that was possible, would be reared; so that the struggle for exist- ence would be periodically excessively severe. Thus, luring these times all the conditions for sexual selection would have been more favorable than at a later period, when man had advanced in his intellectual powers but had retro- graded in his instincts. Therefore, whatever influence sexual selection may have had in producing the differences between the races of man and between man and the higher Quadrumana, this influence would have been more power- ful at a remote period than at the present day, though probably not yet wholly lost. The Manner of Action of Sexual Selection ivith Man- kind. With primeval man under the favorable conditions just stated, and with those savages who at the present time enter into any marriage tie, sexual selection has probably acted in the following manner, subject to greater 01 less interference from female infanticide, early betrothals, etc. The strongest and most vigorous men those who could best defend and hunt for their families, who were pro- vided with the best weapons and possessed the most prop- erty, such as a large number of dogs or other animali- G80 THE DESCENT OF MAN. would succeed in rearing a greater average number of off- spring than the weaker and poorer members of the same tribe. There can, also, be no doubt that such men would generally be able to select the more attractive women. At present the chiefs of nearly every tribe throughout the world succeed in obtaining more than one wife. I hear from Mr. Mantell that until recently almost every girl in New Zealand who was pretty or promised to be pretty was tapu to some chief. With the Kafirs, as Mr. C. Hamilton states,* "the chiefs generally have the pick of the women for many miles round and are most persevering in estab- lishing or confirming their privilege." We have seen that each race has its own style of beauty, and we know that it is natural to man to admire each characteristic point in his domestic animals, dress, ornaments and personal appear- ance when carried a little beyond the average. If, then, the several foregoing propositions be admitted, and I cannot see that they are doubtful, it would be an inex- plicable circumstance if the selection of the more attractive women by the more powerful men of each tribe who would rear on an average a greater number of children did not after the lapse of many generations somewhat modify the character of the tribe. When a foreign breed of our domestic animals is intro- duced into a new country, or when a native breed is long and carefully attended to, either for use or ornament, it is found after several generations to have undergone a greater or less amount of change whenever the means of compari- son exist. This follows from unconscious selection during a long series of generations that is, the preservation of the most approved individuals without any wish or expecta- tion of such a result on the part of the breeder. So again, if during many years two careful breeders rear animals of the same family, and do not compare them together or with a common standard, the animals are found to have become, to the surprise of their owners, slightly different, f Each breeder has impressed, as Von Nathusius well ex- presses it, the character of his own mind his own taste and judgment on his animals. What reason, then, can * "Anthropological Review," Jan., 1870, p. xvi. f " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol ii, pp. 210-217. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 681 be assigned why similar results should not follow from the long-coutinued selection of the most admired women by those men of each tribe who were able to rear the greatest number of children? This would be unconscious selection, for an effect would be produced, independently of any wish or expectation on the part of the men who preferred cer- tain women to others. Let us suppose the members of a tribe, practicing som& form of marriage, to spread over an unoccupied continent, they would soon split up into distinct hordes, separated from each other by various barriers, and still more effectu- ally by the incessant wars between all barbarous nations. The hordes would thus be exposed to slightly different conditions and habits of life and would sooner or later come to differ in some small degree. As soon as this occurred, each isolated tribe would form for itself a slightly different standard of beauty;* and then unconscious selection would come into action through the more powerful and leading men preferring certain women to others. Thus the dif- ferences between the tribes, -at first very slight, would gradually and inevitably be more or less increased. With animals in a state of nature, many characters proper to the males, such as size, strength, special weapons, courage and pugnacity, have been acquired through the law of battle. The semi-human progenitors of man, like their allies the Quadrumana, will almost certainly have been thus modified; and, as savages still fight for the pos- session of their women, a similar process of selection has probably gone on in a greater or less degree to the present day. Other characters proper to the males of the lower animals, such as bright colors and various ornaments, have been acquired by the more attractive males having been preferred by the females. There are, however, exceptional cases in which the males are the selectors, instead of having been the selected. We recognize such cases by the females being more highly ornamented than the males their orna- mentat characters having been transmitted exclusively or * An ingenious writer argues, from a comparison of the pictures of Raphael, Rubens, and modern French artists, that the idea of beauty is not absolutely the same even throughout Europe; see the " Lives of Haydn and Mozart," by Bombet (otherwise M. Beyle), English translat. , p. 278. 682 THE DESCENT OF MAN. chiefly to their female offspring. One such case has been described in the order to which man belongs, that of the Rhesus monkey. Man is more powerful in body and mind than woman, and in the savage state he keeps her in a far more abject state of bondage than does the male of any other animal; therefore it is not surprising that he should have gained the power of selection. Women are everywhere conscious of the value of their own beauty; and when they have the means, they take more delight in decorating themselves with all sorts of ornaments than do men. They borrow the plumes of male birds, with which nature has decked this sex in order to charm the females. As women have long been selected for beauty, it is not surprising that some of their successive variations should have been transmitted exclusively to the same sex; consequently that they should have transmitted beauty in a somewhat higher degree to their female than to their male offspring, and thus have become more beautiful, according to general opinion, than men. Women, however, certainly transmit most of their characters, including some beauty, to their offspring of both sexes; so that the continued preference by the men of each race for the more attractive women, according to their standard of taste, will have tended to modify in the same manner all the individuals of both sexes belonging to the race. With respect to the other form of sexual selection (which with the lower animals is much the more common), namely, when the females are the selectors, and accept only those males which excite or charm them most, we have reason to believe that it formerly acted on our progenitors. Man in all probability owes his beard, and perhaps some other char- acters, to inheritance from an ancient progenitor who thus gained his ornaments. But this form of selection may have occasionally acted during later times; for in utterly barbarous tribes the women have more power in choosing, rejecting and tempting their lovers, or of afterward chang- ing their husbands than might have been expected. As this is a point of some importance, I will give in detail Buch evidence as I have been able to collect. Hearne describes how a woman in one of the tribes of Arctic America repeatedly ran away from her husband and joined her lover; and with the Charruas of South America, SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 683 according to Azara, divorce is quite optional. Among the Abipones, a man on choosing a wife bargains with the parents about the price. But ' ' it frequently happens that the girl rescinds what has been agreed upon between the parents and the bridegroom, obstinately rejecting the very men- tion of marriage." She often runs away, hides herself and thus eludes the bridegroom. Capt. Musters, who lived with the Patagpnians, says that their marriages are always settled by inclination; "if the parents make a match con- trary to the daughter's will, she refuses and is never com- pelled to comply." In Tierra del Fuego a young man first obtains the consent of the parents by doing them some service, and then he attempts carry off the girl; "but if she is unwilling, she hides herself in the woods until her admirer is heartily tired of looking for her and gives up the pur- suit; but this seldom happens." In the Fiji Islands the man seizes on the woman whom he wishes for his wife by actual or pretended force; but " on reaching the home of her abductor, should she not approve of the match, she runs to some one who can protect her; if, however, she is satisfied, the matter is settled forthwith." With the Kal- mucks there is a regular race between the bride and bride- groom, the former having a fair start; and Clarke " was assured that no instance occurs of a girl being caught, unless she has a partiality to the pursuer." Among the wild tribes of the Malay Archipelago there is also a racing match; and it appears from M. Bourien's account, as Sir J. Lubbock remarks, that "the race 'is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong/ but to the young man who has the good fortune to please his intended bride." A sim- ilar custom, with the same result, prevails with the Korarks of Northeastern Asia. Turning to Africa the Kafirs buy their wives, and girls are severely beaten by their fathers if they will not accept a chosen husband ; but it is manifest from many facts given by the Kev. Mr. Shooter, that they have considerable power of choice. Thus, very ugly, though rich men, have been known to fail in getting wives. The girls, before con- senting to be betrothed, compel the men to show them- selves off first in front and then behind, and "exhibit their paces." They have been known to propose to a man, and they not rarely run away with a favored lover. So, again, Mr. Leslie, who was intimately acquainted with the Kafirs, 684 THE DESCENT OF MAN. says: " It is a mistake to imagine that a girl is sold by her father in the same manner, and with the same authority, with which he would dispose of a cow." Among the degraded Bushmen of S. Africa, " when a girl has grown up to womanhood without having been betrothed, which, however, does not often happen, her lover must gain her approbation as well as that of the parents."* Mr. Winwood Reade made inquiries for me with respect to the negroes of Western Africa, and he informs me that "the women, at least among the more intelligent Pagan tribes, have no dif- ficulty in getting the husbands whom they may desire, although it is considered unwomanly to ask a man to marry them. They are quite capable of falling in love and of forming tender, passionate and faithful attachments." Additional cases could be given. We thus see that with savages the women are not in quite so abject a state in relation to marriage as has often been supposed. They can tempt the men whom they prefer, and can sometimes reject those whom they dislike, either before or after marriage. Preference on the part of women, steadily acting in any one direction, would ulti- mately affect the character of the tribe; for the women would generally choose not merely the handsomest men, according to their standard of taste, but those who were at the same time best able to defend and support them. Such well-endowed pairs would commonly rear a larger number of offspring than the less favored. The same result would obviously follow in a still more marked manner if there was selection on both sides; that is, if the more attractive, and, at the same time, more powerful, men were to prefer, and were preferred by, the more attractive women. And this double form of selection seems actually to have *Azara "Voyages," etc., torn, ii, p. 23. Dobrizhoffer, "An Ac- count of the Abipones," vol. ii, 1822, p. 207. Capt. Musters, in " Proc. R. Geograph. Soc.," vol. xv, p. 47 Williams on the Fiji Islanders, as quoted by Lubbock, "Origin of Civilization," 1870. p. 79. On the Fuegians, King and Fitzroy, " Voyages of the 'Advent- ure' and ' Beagle,' " vol. ii, 1839, p. 182. On the Kalmucks, quoted by M'Lennan, " Primitive Marriage," 1865, p. 32. On the Malays, Lub- bock, ibid, p. 76. The Rev. J. Shooter, "On the Kafirs of Natal," 1857, pp. 52-60. Mr. D. Leslie, "Kafir Character and Customs," 1871, p. 4. On the Bushmen, Bnrchell, " Travels in S. Africa," vol. ii, 1824, p. 59. On the Koraks by McKennan, as quoted by Mr. Wake, in " Anthropologia," Oct., 1873, p. 75. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 685 occurred, especially during the earlier periods of our long history. We will now examine a little more closely some of the characters which distinguish the several races of man from one another and from the lower animals, namely, the greater or less deficiency of hair on the body and the color of the skin. We need say nothing about the great diversity in the shape of the features and of the skull between the different races, as we have seen in the last chapter how dif- ferent is the standard of beauty in these respects. These characters will, therefore, probably have been acted on through sexual selection; but we have no means of judging whether they have been acted on chiefly from the male or female side. The musical faculties of man have likewise been already discussed. Absence of Hair on the Body and Its Development on the Face and Head. Prom the presence of the woolly hair or lanugo on the human fetus, and of rudimentary hairs scattered over the body during maturity, we may infer that man is descended from some animal which was born hairy and remained so during life. The loss of hair is an incon- venience and probably an injury to man, even in a hot climate, for he is thus exposed to the scorching of the sun, and to sudden chills, especially during Avet weather. As Mr. Wallace remarks, the natives in all countries are glad to protect their naked backs and shoulders with some slight covering. No one supposes that the nakedness of the skin is any direct advantage to man; his body, there- fore, cannot have been divested of hair through natural selection.* Nor, as shown in a former chapter, havs we any evidence that this can be due to the direct actiot) of climate, or that it is the result of correlated development. The absence of hair on the body is to a certain extent 8 *" Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection," 1870, p. 346. Mr. Wallace believes (p. 350) "that some intelligent power has guided or determined the development of man ;" and he con- siders the hairless condition of the skin as coming under this head. The Rev. T. R. Stebbing, in commenting on this view ("Transactions of Devonshire Assoc. for Science, 1870) remarks, that had Mr. Wallace " employed his usual ingenuity on the ques- tion of man's hairless skin he might have seen the possibility of it? selection through its superior beauty or the health att^cuing t< superior cleanliness." 686 THE DESCENT OF MAN. Becondary sexual character; for in all parts of the world women are less hairy than the men. Therefore we may reasonably suspect that this character has been gained through sexual selection. We know that the faces of several species of monkeys, and large surfaces at the posterior end of the body of other species, have been denuded of hair; and this we may safely attribute to sexual selection, for these surfaces are not only vividly colored, but sometimes, as with the male mandrill and female rhesus, much more vividly in the one sex than in the other, especially during the breeding-season. I am informed by Mr. Bartlett that, as these animals gradually reach maturity, the naked surfaces grow larger compared with the size of their bodies. The hair, however, appears to have been removed, not for the sake of nudity, but that the color of the skin may be more fully displayed. So, again, with many birds, it appears as if the head and neck had been divested of feathers, through sexual selection, to exhibit the brightly colored skin. A.S the body in woman is less hairy than in man, and as this character is common to all races, we may conclude that it was our female semi-human ancestors who were first divested of ha ; r, and that this occurred at an extremely re- mote period before the several races had diverged from a common stock. While our female ancestors were gradually acquiring this new character of nudity they must have transmitted it almost equally to their offspring of both sexes while young; so that its transmission, as with the ornaments of many mammals and birds, has not been limited either by sex or age. There is nothing surprising in a partial loss of hair having been esteemed as an orna- ment by our ape-like progenitors, for we have seen that in- numerable strange characters have been thus esteemed by animals of all kinds and have consequently been gained through sexual selection. Nor is it surprising that a slightly injurious character should have been thus acquired; for we know that this is the case with the plumes of certain birds, and with the horns of certain stags. The females of some of the anthropoid apes, as stated in a former chapter, are somewhat less hairy on the under surface than the males; and here we have what might have afforded a commencement for the process of denudation. With respect to the completion of the process through SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 687 sexual selection, it is well to bear in mind the New Zea- land proverb: " There is no woman for a hairy man." All who have seen photographs of the Siamese hairy family will admit how ludicrously hideous is the opposite extreme of excessive hairiness. And the king of Siam had to bribe a man to marry the first hairy woman in the family; and she transmitted this character to her young offspring of both sexes.* Some races are much more hairy than others, especially the males; but it must not be assumed that the more hairy races, such as the Europeans, have retained their primor- dial condition more completely than the naked races, such as the Kalmucks or Americans. It is more probable that the hairiness of the former is due to partial reversion; for characters which have been at some former period long in- herited are always apt to return. We have seen that idiots are often very hairy, and they are apt to revert in other characters to a lower animal type. It does not appear that a cold climate has been influential in leading to this kind of reversion; excepting perhaps with the negroes, who have been reared during several generations in the United States,f and possibly with the Ainos, who inhabit the northern islands of the Japan archipelago. But the laws of inheritance are so complex that we can seldom under- stand their action. If the greater hairiness of certain races be the result of reversion, unchecked by any form of selection, its extreme variability, even within the limits of the same race, ceases to be remarkable. J * " The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," vol. ii, 1868, p. 327. f " Investigations into Military and Anthropological Statistics of American Soldiers," by B. A. Gould, 1869; p. 568: Observations were carefully made on the hairiness of 2,129 black and colored soldiers, while they were bathing; and by looking to the published table, " it is manifest at a glance that there is but little, if any, dif- ference between the white and the black races in this respect." It is, however, certain that negroes in their native and much hotter land of Africa, have remarkably smooth bodies. It should be particularly -observe*~d, that both pure blacks and mulattoes were included in the above enumeration; and this is an unfortunate circumstance, as in accordance with a principle, the truth of which I have elsewhere proved, crossed races of man would be eminently liable to revert to the primordial hairy character of their early ape-like progenitors. \ Hardly any view advanced in this work has met with so much disfavor (see for instance, Spengel, "Die Fortschritte des Darwin- 688 THE DESCENT OF MAN. With respect to the beard in man, if we turn to our best guide, the Qaadrumana, we find beards equally developed in both sexes of many species, but in some, either confined to the males, or more developed in them than in the females. From this fact and from the curious arrangement, as well as the bright colors of the hair about the heads of many monkeys, it is highly probable, as before explained, that the males first acquired their beards through sexual selec- tion as an ornament, transmitting them in most cases, equally or nearly so, to their offspring of both sexes. AVe know from Eschricht* that with mankind the female as well as the male fetus is furnished with much hair on the face, especially round the mouth; and this indicates that we are descended from progenitors of whom both sexes were bearded. It appears, therefore, at first sight probable that man has retained his beard from a very early period, while woman lost her beard at the same time that her body became almost completely divested of hair. Even the color of our beards seems to have been inherited from an ape- like progenitor; for when there is any difference in tint between the hair of the head and the beard, the latter is lighter colored in all monkeys and in man. In those Quadrumana in which the male has a larger beard than that of the female, it is fully developed only at maturity, just as with mankind; and it is possible that only the latei stages of development have been retained by man. In op- position to this view of the retention of the beard from an early period is the fact of its great variability in different, races, and even within the same race; for this indicates reversion long lost characters being very apt to vary on reappearance. Nor must we overlook the part which sexual selection may have played in later times; for we know that with savages the men of the beardless races take infinite pain* in eradicating every hair from their faces as something odious, while the men of the bearded races feel the greatest ismus," 1874, p. 80) as the above explanation of the loss of hair in mankind through sexual selection; but none of the opposed argu- ments seem to me of much weight, in comparison with the facts showing that the nudity of the skin is to a certain extent a secon- dary sexual character in man and in some of the Quadrumana. * " Ueber die Richtung der Haare am Menschlichen Korper," in Mailer's " Archiv f ur Anat. und Phys.," 1837, s. 40. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 689 pride in their beards. The women, no doubt, participate in these feelings, and if so sexual selection can hardly have failed to have effected something in the course of later times. It is also possible that the long-continued habit of eradicating the hair may have produced an inherited effect. Dr. Brown-Sequard has shown that if certain animals are operated on in a particular manner their offspring are affected. Further evidence could be given of the inherit- ance of the effects of mutilations; but a fact lately ascer- by Mr. Salvin * has a more direct bearing on the present question; for he has shown that the motmots, which are known habitually to bite off the barbs of the two central tail-feathers, have the barbs of these feathers naturally somewhat reduced. f Nevertheless, with mankind the habit of eradicating the beard and the hairs on the body would probably not have arisen until these had already become by some means reduced. It is difficult to form any judgment as to how the hair on the head became developed to its present great length in many races. EschrichtJ states that in the human fetus the hair on the face during the fifth month is longer than that on the head; and this indicates that our semi-human progenitors were not furnished with long tresses, which must, therefore, have been a late acquisition. This is like- wise indicated by the extraordinary difference in the length of the hair in the different races; in the negro the hair forms a mere curly mat; with us it is of great length, and with the American natives it not rarely reaches to the ground. Some species of Semnopithecus' have their heads covered with moderately long hair, and this probably serves as an ornament and was acquired through sexual selection. The same view may, perhaps, be extended to mankind, for we know that long tresses are now and were formerly much admired, as may be observed in the works of almost every poet. St. Paul says: "If a woman have long hair it is a * On the tail-feathers of Momotus, " Proc. Zoolog. Soc.," 1873, p. 429 - (Mr. Sproat has suggested (" Scenes and Studies of Savage Life," 1868, p. 25) this same view. Some distinguished ethnologists, among others M. Gosse of Geneva, believe that artificial modifications of th skull tend to be inherited. J " Uber die Richtung," ibid, s. <0. 690 THE DESCENT OF MAN. glory to her;" and we have seen that in North America a chief was elected solely from the length of his hair. Color of the Skin. The best kind of evidence that in man the color of the skin has been modified through sexual selection is scanty; for in most races the sexes do not diifer in this respect, and only slightly, as we have seen, io others. We know, however, from the many facts already given that the color of the skin is regarded by the men of all races as a highly important element in their beauty; so that it is a character which would be likely to have been modified through selection, as has occurred in innumerable instances with the lower animals. It seems at first sight a monstrous supposition that the jet blackness of the negro should have been gained through sexual selection; but this view is supported by various analogies, and we know that negroes admire their own color. With mammals when the sexes differ in color the male is often black or much darker than the female; and it depends merely on the form of inheritance whether this or any other tint is transmitted to both sexes or to one alone. The resemblance to a negro in miniature of Pithecia satanas with his jet-black skin, white rolling eyeballs and hair parted on the top of the head is almost ludicrous. The color of the face differs much more widely in the various kinds of monkeys than it does in the races of man; and we have some reason to believe that the red, blue, orange, almost white and black tints of their skin, even when common to both sexes, as well as the bright colors of their fur and the ornamental tufts about the head, have all been acquired through sexual selection. As the order of development during growth generally indicates the order in which the characters of a species have been developed and modified during previous generations, and as the newly born infants of the various races of man do not differ nearly as much in color as do the adults, although their bodies are as completely destitute of hair, we have some slight evidence that the tints of the different races were acquired at a period subsequent to the removal of the hair, which must have occurred at a very early period in the history of man. Summary. We may . conclude .that the greater size, SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. 691 strength, courage^ pugnacity, and energy of man, in com- parison with women, were acquired during primeval times, and have subsequently been augmented, chiefly through the contests of rival males for the possession of the females. The greater intellectual vigor and power of invention in man is probably due to natural selection, combined with the inherited effects of habit, for the most able men will have succeeded best in defending and providing for them- selves and for their wives and offspring. As far as the ex- treme intricacy of the subject permits us to judge, it appears that our male ape-like progenitors acquired their beards as an ornament to charm or excite the opposite sex, and transmitted them only to their male offspring. The females apparently first had their bodies denuded of hair, also as a sexual ornament; but they transmitted this char- acter almost equally to both sexes. It is not improbable that the females were modified in other respects for the same purpose and by the same means; so that women have acquired sweeter voices and become more beautiful than men. It deserves attention that with mankind the conditions were in many respects much more favorable for sexual selection, during a very early period, when man had only just attained to the rank of manhood, than during later times. For he would then, as we may safely conclude, have been guided more by his instinctive passions, and less by foresight or reason. He would have jealousy guarded his wife or wives. He would not have practiced infanticide; nor valued his wives merely as useful slaves; nor have been betrothed to them during infancy. Hence we may infer that the races of men were differentiated, as far as sexual selection is concerned, in chief part at a very remote epoch ; and this conclusion throws light on the remarkable fact that at the most ancient period, of which we have as yet any record, the races of man had already come to differ nearly or quite as much as they do at the present day. "The views here advanced, on the part which sexual selec- tion has played in the history of man, want scientific pre- cision. He who does not admit this agency in the case of the lower animals, will disregard all that I have written in the later chapters on man. We cannot positively say that this character, but not that, has been thus modified; it has, 692 THE DESCENT OF MAN. however, been shown that the races of man differ from each other and from their nearest allies, in certain charac- ters which are of no service to them in their daily habits of life, and which it is extremely probable would have been modified through sexual selection. \Ve have seen that with the lowest savages the people of each tribe admire their own characteristic qualities the shape of the head and face, the squareness of the cheek-bones, the prominence or depression of the nose, the color of the skin, the length of the hair on the head, the absence of hair on the face and body, or the presence of a great beard, and so forth. Hence these and other such points could hardly fail to be slowly and gradually exaggerated from the more powerful and able men in each tribe, who would succeed in rearing the largest number of offspring, having selected during many genera- tions for their wives the most strongly characterized and therefore most attractive women. For my own part I con- clude that of all the causes which have led to the differ- ences in external appearance between the races of man, and to a certain extent between man and the lower animals, sexual selection has been the most efficient. GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 693 CHAPTER XXI. GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. Main conclusion that man is descended from some lower form Manner of development Genealogy of man Intellectual and moral faculties Sexual selection Concluding remarks. A BRIEF summary will be sufficient to recall to the reader's mind the more salient points in this work. Many of the views which have been advanced are highly specula- tive, and some no doubt will'prove erroneous; but I have in every case given the reasons which have led me to one view rather than to another. It seemed worth while to try how far the principle of evolution would throw light on some of the more complex problems in the natural history of man. False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence, do little harm, for every one takes a salutary pleasure in proving their falseness; and, when this is done, one path toward error is closed and the road to truth is often at the same time opened. The main conclusion here arrived_at T and now heldjby many_ natural iste, wh"o are well"competent_to form a spuno" ' ids iudgmeTrt, IB that man is descended fvnnTsftnnrtes's jrgdniaed torm. The grounds upon which this conclusion "rests will never be shaken, for the close similarity between man and the lower animals in embryonic development, as well as in innumerable points of structure and constitu- tion, both of high and of the most trifling importance the rudiments which he retains, and the abnormal reversions to which he is occasionally liable are facts which cannot be disputed. They have long been known, but. until recently, they told us nothing with respect to the origin of man. Now, when viewed by the light of our knowledge of the whole organic world, their meaning is unmistakable. The great principle of evolution stands up clear and firm when these groups of facts are considered in connection with. 694 THE DESCENT OF MAN. others, such as the mutual affinities of the members of the same group, their geographical distribution in past and present times, and their geological succession. It is incredi- ble that all these facts should speak falsely. He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot any longer believe that man is the work of a separate act of creation. He will be forced to admit that the close resemblance of the embryo of man to that, for instance, of a dog the construction^ his skull, limbs and whole frame on the same plan with that of other mammals, independently of the uses to which the parts may be put the occasional reappearance of various structures, for instance of several muscles, which man does not normally possess, but which are common to i;Le Quadrumana and a crowd of analogous facts all point in the plainest manner to the conclusion that man is the co - descendant with other mammals of a common progenitor. We have seen that man incessantly presents individual differences in all parts of his body and in his mental faculties. These differences or variations seem to be ./induced by the same general causes, and to obey the same i laws as with the lower animals. In both cases similar laws inheritance prevail. Man tends to increase at a greater rate than his means of subsistence; consequently he is occa- sionally subjected to a severe struggle for existence, and natural selection will have effected whatever lies within its scope. A succession of strongly marked variations of a similar nature is by no means requisite; slight fluctuating differences in the individual suffice for the work of natural selection; not that we have any reason to suppose that in the same species all parts of the organization tend to vary to the same degree. We may feel assured that the inherited effects of the long-continued use or disuse of parts will have done much in the same direction with natural select tion. Modifications formerly of importance, though no longer of any special use, are long-inherited. When one part is modified other parts change through the principle of correlation, of which we have instances in many curious cases of correlated monstrosities. Something may be attributed to the direct and definite action of the surround- ing conditions of life, such as abundant food, heat or moisture; and, lastly, many characters of slight physio- GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 695 logical importance, some indeed of considerable importance, have been gained through sexual selection. No doubt man, as well as every other animal, presents structures, which seem to our limited knowledge, not to be now of any service to him, nor to have been so formerly, either for the general conditions of life, or in the relations of one sex to the other. Such structures cannot be accounted for by any form of selection, or by the inherited effects of the use and disuse of parts. We know, however, that many strange and strongly marked peculiarities of structure occasionally appear in our domesticated- produc- tions, and if their unknown causes were to act more uni- formly, they would probably become common to all the individuals of the species. We may hope hereafter to understand something about the causes of such occasional modifications, especially through the study of monstrosities; hence, the labors of experimentalists, such as those of M. Camille Dareste, are full of promise for the future. In general we can only say that the cause of each slight varia- tion and of each monstrosity lies much more in the con- stitution of the organism than in the nature of the sur- rounding conditions; though new and changed conditions certainly play an important part in exciting organic changes of many kinds. Through the means just specified, aided perhaps by others as yet undiscovered, man lias been raised to his present state. But since he attained to the rank of man- hood, he has diverged into distinct races, or, as they may be more fitly called, sub-species. Some of these, such as the negro and European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further in- formation, they would undoubtedly have been considered by him as good and true species. Nevertheless, all the races agree in so many unimportant details of structure and in so many mental peculiarities that these can be ac- counted for only by inheritance from a common progenitor; and a progenitor thus characterized would probably deserve to rank as man. It must not be supposed that the divergence of each race from the other races and of all from a common stock can be traced back to any one pair of progenitors. On the con- trary, at every stage in the process of modification, all the individuals which were in any way better fitted for their 696 THE DESCENT OF MAN. conditions of life, though in different degrees, would have survived in greater numbers than the less well-fitted. The process would have been like that followed by man, when he does not intentionally select particular individuals, but breeds from all the superior individuals and neglects the inferior. He thus slowly but surely modifies his stock and unconsciously forms a new strain. So with respect to modifications acquired independently of selection, and due to variations arising from the nature of the organism and the action of the surrounding conditions, or from changed habits of life, no single pair will have been modified much more than the other pairs inhabiting the same country, for all will have been continually blended through free inter- crossing. By considering the embryological structure of man the homologies which he presents with the lower animals the rudiments which he retains and the reversions to which he is liable, we can partly recall in imagination the former condition of our early progenitors; and can approximately place them in their proper place in the zoological series. d We thus learn that man is descended from a hfliry quadruped, probably arboreal in its haloits and an inhabi- tant 6t the Old World. This creature if its whole " " ~5Tu"creia een examine y a nauras, wou ave foeen Classed among the (^uadrumana, as surely as the still more anr-icMrrpTTrgeuTtor of the~01d_aiid JN'ew World Inon- keys. Tliti Qlindi umaua aud all the higher mammals are" this through a long line of diversified forms, from some amphibian-like creature, and this again from some fish-like animal. In the dim obscurity of the past we can see that the early progenitor of all the Vertebrata must have been an aquatic animal, provided with branchiae, with the two sexes united in the same individual, and with the most important organs of the body (such as the brain and heart) imper- fectly or not at all developed. This animal seems to have been more like the larvae of the existing marine Ascidians than any other known form. The high standard of our intellectual powers and moral dis- position is the greatest difficulty which presents itself, after we have been driven to this conclusion on the origin of man. But every one who admits the principle of evolution GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 697 must see that the mental powers of the higher animals, which are the same in kind with those of man, though so different in degree, are capable of advancement. Thus the interval between the mental powers of one of the higher apes and of a fish, or between those of an ant and scale-insect, is immense ; yet their development does not offer any special difficulty ; for with our domesticated animals the mental faculties are certainly variable, and the variations are inherited. No one doubts that they are of the utmost importance to animals in a state of nature. Therefore, the conditions are favorable for their develop- ment through natural selection. The same conclusion may be extended to man; the intellect must have been all- important to him, even at a very remote period, as enabling him to invent and use language, to make weapons, tools, traps, etc., whereby with the aid of his social habits he long ago became the most dominant of all living creatures. A great stride in the development of the intellect will have followed, as soon as the half -art and half -instinct of language came into use; for the continued use of lan- guage will have reacted on the brain and produced an inherited effect; and this again will have reacted on the improvement of language. As Mr. Chauncey Wright* has well remarked, the largeness of the brain in man relatively to his body, compared with the lower animals, may be attributed in chief part to the early use of some simple form of language that wonderful engine which affixes signs to all sorts of objects and qualities, and excites trains of thought which would never arise from the mere impression of the senses, or if they did arise could not be followed out. The higher intellectual powers of man, such as those of ratiocination, abstraction, self-consciousness, etc., probably follow from the continued improvement and exercise of the other mental faculties. The development of the moral qualities is a more inter- esting problem. The foundation lies in the social instincts, including under this term the family ties. These instincts are highly complex, and in the case of the lower animals give special tendencies toward certain definite actions; but the more important elements are love and the distinct * " On the Limits of Natural Selection," in the " North American Koview," Oct., 1870, p. 295. 698 THE DESCENT OF MAN. emotion of sympathy. Animals endowed with the social instincts take pleasure in one another's company, warn one another of danger, defend and aid one another in many ways. These instincts do not extend to all the individuals of the species, but only to those of the same community. As they are highly beneficial to the species they have in all probability been acquired through natural selection. A moral being is one who is capable of reflecting on his past actions and their motives of approving of some and disapproving of others; and the fact that man is the one being who certainly deserves this designation is the great- est of all distinctions between him and the lower animals. But in the fourth chapter I have endeavored to show that the moral sense follows, firstly, from the enduring and ever- present nature of the social instincts; secondly, from man's appreciation of the approbation and disapprobation of his fellows; and, thirdly, from the high activity of his mental faculties, with past impressions extremely vivid; and in these latter respects he differs from the lower animals. Owing to this condition of mind, man cannot avoid look- ing both backward and forward and comparing past im- pressions. Hence after some temporary desire or passion has mastered his social instincts, lis reflects and compares the now weakened impression of such past impulses with the ever-present social instincts ; and he then feels that sense of dissatisfaction which all unsatisfied instincts leave behind them, he therefore resolves to act differently for the future and this is conscience. Any instinct perma- nently stronger or more enduring than another gives rise to a feeling which we express by saying that it ought to be obeyed. A pointer dog if able to reflect on his past con- duct would say to himself, I ought (as indeed we say of him) to have pointed at that hare and not have yielded to the passing temptation of hunting it. Social animals are impelled partly by a wish to aid the members of their community in a general manner, but more commonly to perform certain definite actions. Man is impelled by the same general wish to aid his fellows; but has few or no special instincts. He differs also from the lower animals in the power of expressing his desires by words, which thus become a guide to the aid required and bestowed. The motive to give aid is likewise much modi- fied in man; it no longer consists solely of a blind instinct- GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCGLUSION". 701 ive impulse, but is much influenced by tbd at in this work of his fellows. The appreciation ancLrreligious; but he praise and blame both rest on s^ipo-ow w hy it is more irre- as we have seen, is 0110 of th<- most i-^ ;i distiuct^^-ies by the social instincts. Sympathy, though gaineu as an iii->.. stinct, is also much strengthened by exercise or habit. As all men desire their own happiness, praise or blame is bestowed on actions and motives according as they lead to this end; and as happiness is an essential part of the gen- eral good the greatest-happiness principle indirectly serves as a nearly safe standard of right and wrong. As the rea- soning powers advance and experience is gained the remoter effects of certain lines of conduct on the character of the individual and on the general good are perceived; and then the self-regarding virtues come within the scope of public opinion and receive praise and their opposites blame. But with the less civilized nations reason often errs, and many bad customs and base superstitions come within the same scope and are then esteemed as high virtues and their breach as heavy crimes. The moral faculties are generally and justly esteemed as of higher value than the intellectual powers. But we should bear in mind that the activity of the mind in vividly recalling past impressions is one of the fundamental though secondary bases of conscience. This affords the strongest argument for educating and stimulating in all possible ways the intellectual faculties of every human being. No doubt a man with a torpid mind, if his social affections and sympathies are well developed, will be led to good actions, and may have a fairly sensitive conscience. But whatever renders the imagination more vivid and strengthens the habit of recalling and comparing past impressions will make the conscience more sensitive, and may even somewhat compensate for weak social affections and sympathies. The moral nature of man has reached its present stand- ard partly through the advancement of his reasoning powers and consequently of a just public opinion, but especially from his" sympathies having been rendered more tender and widely diffused through the effects of habit, example, instruction and reflection. It is not improbable that after long practice virtuous tendencies may be inherited. AVith the more civilized races the conviction of the existence of an all-seeing Deity has had a potent influence on the -THE DESCENT OF MAN. emotion of sym^ ultimately man does not accept the instincts take ple,^ his f e ii we as his sole guide, though another of danger, ^-i^ JK . f his habitual convictions, con- ways.^ T^ese instmctf ord hilli - h(i ;:l f egt rule . His con- Qeience then becomes the supreme judge and monitor. Nevertheless, the first foundation or origin of the moral sense lies in the social instincts, including sympathy; and these instincts no doubt were primarily gained, as in the case of the lower animals, through natural selection. The belief in God has often been advanced as not only the greatest but the most complete of all the distinctions between man and the lower animals. It is, however, im- possible, as we have seen, to maintain that this belief is innate or instinctive in man. On the other hand, a belief in all-pervading spiritual agencies seems to be universal; and apparently follows from a considerable advance in man's reason, and from a still greater advance in his faculties of imagination, curiosity and wonder. I am aware that the assumed instinctive belief in God has been used by many persons as an argument for His existence. But this is a rash argument, as we should thus be compelled to believe in the existence of many cruel and malignant spirits, only a little more powerful than man; for the belief in them is far more general than in a beneficient Deity. The idea of a universal and beneficient Creator -does not seem to arise in the mind of man until he has been elevated by long-continued culture. He who believes in the advancement of man from some low organized form will naturally ask, How does this bear on the belief in the immortality of the soul? The barbar- ous races of man, as Sir L Lubbock has shown, possess no clear belief of this kind ; but arguments derived from the primeval beliefs of savages are, as we have just seen, of little or no avail. Few persons feel any anxiety from the impossibility of determining at what precise period in the development of the individual, from the first trace of a minute germinal vesicle, man becomes an immortal being; and there is no greater cause for anxiety because the period cannot possibly be determined in the gradually ascending organic scale.* * The Rev. J. A. Picton gives a discussion to this efiwt in hi8 " New Theories and the Old Faith," 1870. GENERAL SUMMA*.* 7 AND CONCL USION. 701 I am aware that the conclusions arrived at in this work will be denounced by some as highly irreligious; but he who denounces them is bound to show why it is more irre- ligious to explain the origin of man as a distinct species by descent from some lower form, through the laws of varia- tion and natural selection, than to explain the birth of the individual through the laws of ordinary reproduction. The birth both of the species and of the individual are equally parts of that grand sequence of events, which our minds refuse to accept as the result of blind chance. The under- standing revolts at such a conclusion, whether or not we are able to believe that every slight variation of structure, the union of each pair in marriage, the dissemination of each seed, and other such events have all been ordained for some special purpose. Sexual selection has been treated at great length in this work; for, as I have attempted to show, it has played an important part in the history of the organic world. I am aware that much remains doubtful, but I have endeavored to give a fair view of the whole case. In the lower divis- ions of the animal kingdom sexual selection seems to have done nothing; such animals are often affixed for life to the same spot, or have the sexes combined in the same indi- vidual, or, what is still more important, their perceptive and intellectual faculties are not sufficiently advanced to allow of the feelings of love and jealousy, or of the exertion of choice. When, however, we come to the Arthropoda and Yertebrata, even to the lowest classes in these two great sub-kingdoms, sexual selection has effected much. In the several great classes of the animal kingdom in mammals, birds, reptiles, fishes, insects and even crusta- ceans the differences between the sexes follow nearly the same rules. The males are almost always the wooers; and they alone are armed with special weapons for fighting with their rivals. They are generally stronger and larger than the females, and are endowed with the requisite qualities of courage and pugnacity. They are provided, either exclusively or in a much higher degree than the females, with organs for vocal or instrumental music, and with odoriferous glands. They are ornamented with infinitely diversified appendages, and with the most brilliant or con- spicuous colors, often arranged in elegant patterns, while 70;i THE DESCENT OF MAN. the females are unadorned. When the sexes differ in more important structures it is the male which is provided with special sense-organs for discovering the female, with loco- motive organs for reaching her, and often with prehensile organs for holding her. These various structures for charm- ing or securing the female are often developed in the male during only part of the year; namely, the breeding-season. They have in many cases been more or less transferred to the females; and in the latter case they often appear in her as mere rudiments. They are lost or never gained by the males after emasculation. Generally they are not developed in the male during early youth, but appear a short time before the age for reproduction. Hence, in most cases the young of both sexes resemble each other; and the female somewhat resembles her young offspring throughout life. In almost every great class a few anomalous cases occur, where there has been an almost complete transposition of the characters proper to the two sexes; the females assum- ing characters which properly belong to the males. This surprising uniformity in the laws regulating the differences between the sexes in so many and such widely separated classes is intelligible if we admit the action of one common cause; namely, sexual selection. Sexual selection depends on the success of certain indi- viduals over others of the same sex, in relation to the prop- ' agation of the species; while natural selection depends on i the success of both sexes, at all ages, in relation to the gen- \eral conditions of life. The sexual struggle is of two Kinds; in the one it is between the individuals of the same sex, generally the males, in order to drive away or kill their rivals, the females remaining passive; while in the other, the struggle is likewise between the individuals of the same sex, in order to excite or charm those of the opposite sex, generally the females, which no longer remain passive, but select the more agreeable partners. This latter kind of selection is closely analogous to that which man unin- tentionally, yet effectually, brings to bear on his domesti- cated productions, when he preserves during a long period the most pleasing or useful individuals, without any wish to modify the breed. The laws of inheritance determine whether characters gained through sexual selection by either sex shall be trans- mitted to the same sex, or to both; as well as the age at GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 703 which they shall be developed. It appears that variations arising late in life are commonly transmitted to one and the same sex. Variability is the necessary basis for the action of selection and is wholly independent of it. It fol- lows from this, that variations of the same general nature have often been taken advantage of and accumulated through sexual selection in relation to the propagation of the species, as well as through natural selection in relation to the general purposes of life. Hence secondary sexual characters, when equally transmitted to both sexes, can be distinguished from ordinary specific characters only by the light of analogy. The modifications acquired through sexual selection are often so strongly pronounced that the two sexes have frequently been ranked as distinct species, or even as distinct genera. Such strongly marked differ- ences must be in some manner highly important; and we know that they have been acquired in some instances at the cost not only of inconvenience, but of exposure to actual danger. The belief in the power of sexual selection rests chiefly on the following considerations. Certain characters are confined to one sex; and this alone renders it probable that in most cases they are connected with the act of reproduc- tion. In innumerable instances these characters are fully developed only at maturity, and often during only a part of the year, which is always the breeding-season. The males (passing over a few exceptional cases) are the more active in courtship; they are the better armed, and are rendered the more attractive in various ways. It is to be especially observed that the males display their attractions with elaborate care in the presence of the females; and that they rarely or never display them excepting during the season of love. It is incredible that all this should be pur- poseless. Lastly, we have distinct evidence with some quadrupeds and birds that the individuals of one sex are capable of feeling a strong antipathy or preference for certain individuals of the other sex. - Bearing in mind these facts and the marked results of man's unconscious selection when applied to domesticated animals and cultivated plants it seems to me almost cer- tain that if the individuals of one sex were during a long ^ series of generations to prefer pairing with certain indi- j viduals of the other sex, characterized in some peculiar I 704 THE DESCENT OF MAN. manner, the offspring would slowly but surely become modified in this same manner. I have not attempted to conceal that, excepting when the males are more numerous than the females, or when polygamy prevails, it is doubtful how the more attractive males succeed in leaving a larger number of offspring to inherit their superiority in orna- ments or other charms than the less attractive males; but I have shown that this would probably follow from the females especially the more vigorous ones, which would be the first to breed preferring not only the more attract- ive but at the same time the more vigorous and victorious males. Although we have some positive evidence that birds appreciate bright and beautiful objects, as with the bower- birds of Australia, and although they certainly appreciate the power of song, yet I fully admit that it is astonishing that the females of many birds and some mammals should be endowed with sufficient taste to appreciate ornaments which we have reason to attribute to sexual selection; and this is even more astonishing iu the case of reptiles, fish and insects. But we really know little about the minds of the lower animals. It cannot be supposed, for instance, that male birds of paradise or peacocks should take such pains in erecting, spreading and vibrating their beautiful plumes before the females for no purpose. We should remember the fact given on excellent authority in a former chapter that several peahens, when debarred from an admired male, remained widows during a whole season rather than pair with another bird. Nevertheless, I know of no fact in natural history more wonderful than that the female Argus pheasant should appreciate the exquisite shading of the ball-and-socket ornaments and the elegant patterns on the wing-feathers of the male. He who thinks that the male was created as he now exists must admit tbat the great plumes, which prevent the wings from being used for flight and which are displayed during courtship and at no other time in a manner quite peculiar to this one species, were given to him as an ornament. If so, he must likewise admit that the female was created and endowed with the capacity of appreciating such ornaments. I differ only in the convic- tion that the male Argus pheasant acquired his beauty gradually, through the preference of the females during GENERAL S UMMAR 7 AND CONGL USION 705 many generations for the more highly ornamented males; the esthetic capacity of the females having been advanced through exercise or habit just as our own taste is gradually improved. In the male, through the fortunate chance of a few feathers being left unchanged, we can distinctly trace how simple spots with a little fulvous shading on one side may have been developed by small steps into the wonderful ball-and-socket ornaments; and it is probable that they were actually thus developed. Every one who admits the principle of evolution, and yet feels great difficulty in admitting that female mammals, birds, reptiles and fish, could have acquired the high taste implied by the beauty of the males, and which generally coincides with our own standard, should reflect that the nerve-cells of the brain in the highest as well as in the lowest members of the Vertebrate series, are derived from those of the common progenitor of this great kingdom. For we can thus see how it has come to pass that certain mental faculties, in various and widely distinct groups of animals, have been developed in nearly the same mannei and to nearly the same degree. The reader who has taken the trouble to go through the several chapters devoted to sexual selection will be able to judge how far the conclusions at which I have arrived are supported by sufficient avidence. If be accepts these con- clusions he may, I think, safely extend them tc mankind, but it would be superfluous here to repeat what I have so lately said on the manner in which sexual selection appar- ently has acted on man, both on the male and female side, causing the two sexes to differ in body and mind, and the several races to differ from each other in various characters, as well as from their ancient and lowly organized pro- genitors. He who admits the principle of sexual selection will be led to the remarkable conclusion that the nervous system not only regulates most of the existing functions of the body, but has indirectly influenced the progressive develop- ment of various bodily structures and of certain mental qualities. Courage, pugnacity, perseverance, strength and size of body, weapons of all kinds, musical organs, both vocal and instrumental, bright colors and ornamental ap- pendages, have all been indirectly gained by the one sex or the other, through the exertion of choice, the influence of ?06 THE DESCENT OF MAN. love and jealousy and the appreciation of the beautiful in sound, color or form; and these powers of the mind mani- festly depend on the development of the brain. Man scans with scrupulous care the character and pedi- gree of his horses, cattle and dogs before he matches them; I but when he comes to his own marriage he rarely, or never, ' takes any such care. He is impelled by nearly the same motives as -the lower animals, when they are left to their ( own free choice, though he is in so far superior to them that he highly values mental charms and virtues. On the other hand he is strongly attracted by mere wealth or rank. Yet he might by selection do something not only for the bodily constitution and frame of his offspring, but for their intellectual and moral qualities. Both sexes ought to re- frain from marriage if they are in any marked degree in- ferior in body or mind; but such hopes are Utopian and will never be even partially realized until the laws of in- heritance are thoroughly known Every one does good service, who aids toward this end. When the principles of breeding and inheritance are better understood, we shall not hear ignorant member; of our legislature rejecting with , scorn a plan for ascertaining whether or not consanguineous ymarriages are injurious to man. The advancement of the welfare of mankind is a most intricate problem; all ought to refrain from marriage who cannot avoid abject poverty for their children; for poverty is not only a grea'; evii. but tends to its own increase by "eading to recklessness h, marriage On the other hand, as Mr. Gal ton has remarked, if the prudent avoid marriage, while the reckless marry, the inferior members tend to supplant the better members of society. Man, like every other animal, has no doubt advanced to his present high condition through a struggle for existence consequent on his rapid multiplication; and if he is to advance still higher, it is to be feared that he must remain subject to a severe struggle. Otherwise he would sink into indolence, and the more gifted men would not be more successful in the battle of life than the less gifted. Hence our natural rate of increase, though leading to many and obvious evils, must not be greatly n'minished by any means. There should be open competition for all men; :md the most able should not be prevented by laws or customs from succeeding GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 707 best and rearing the largest number of offspring. Impor- tant as the struggle for existence has been and even still is, yet as far as the highest part of man's nature is concerned'' there are other agencies more important. For the moral qualities are advanced, either directly or indirectly, much more through the effects of habit, the reasoning powers, instruction, religion, etc., than through natural selection; though to this latter agency may be safely attributed the social instincts which afforded the basis for the develop- ment of the moral sense. The main conclusion arrived at in this work, namely, that man is descended from some lowly organized form, will, I regret to think, be highly distasteful to many. But there can hardly be a doubt that we are descended from barbarians. The astonishment which I felt on first seeing a party of Fuegians on a wild and broken shore will never be forgotten by me, for the reflection at once rushed into my mind ' We must, however, acknowledge, as it seems to me, that man, with all his noble qualities, with sympathy which feels for the most debased, with benevolence which / extends not only to other men but to the humblest living / creature, with his godlike intellect which has penetrated / into the movements and constitution of the solar system / with all these exalted powers man still bears in his bodily / frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SEXUAL SELECTION IN RELATION TO MONKEYS. [Reprinted from Nature, November 2, 1876, p. 18.] IN the discussion on sexual selection in my " Descent of Man;" no case interested and perplexed me so much as the brightly colored hinder ends and adjoining parts of certain monkeys. As these parts are more brightly colored in one sex than the other, and as they become more brilliant during the season of love, I concluded that the colors had been gained as a sexual attraction. I was well aware that I thus laid myself open to ridicule; though in fact it is not more surprising that a monkey should display his bright- red hinder ena than that a peacock should display his mag- nificent tail. I had, however, at that time no evidence of monkeys exhibiting this part of their bodies during their courtship ; and such display in the case of birds affords the best evidence that the ornaments of the males are of service to them by attracting or exciting the females. I have lately read an article by Joh. von Fischer, of Gotha, published in "Der f Zoologische Garten," April, 1876, on the expression of monkeys under various emotions, which is well worthy of study by any one interested in the subject, and which shows that the author is a careful and acute observer. In this article there is an account of the behavior of a young male mandrill when he first beheld himself in a looking- glass, and it is added that after a time he turned round and presented his red hinder end to the glass. Accord- ingly I wrote to Herr J. von Fischer to ask what he sup- posed was the meaning of this strange action, and he has sent me two long letters full of new and curious details, which will, I hope, be hereafter published. He says that 710 THE DESCENT OF MAN. he was himself at first perplexed by the above action, and was thus led carefully to observe several individuals of various other species of monkeys, which he has long kept in his house. He finds that not only the mandrill (Cyno- cephalus mormon] but the drill ( C'. leucoplmus] and three other kinds of baboons (CJiamadryas sphinx and babouin), also Cynopithecus niger, and Macacus rhesus and nemes- trinus, turn this part of their bodies, which in all these species is more or less brightly colored, to him when they are pleased, and to other persons as a sort of greeting. He took pains to cure a Macacus rhesus, which he had kept for five years, of this indecorous habit, and at last suc- ceeded. These monkeys are particularly apt to act in this manner, grinning at the same time, when first introduced to a new monkey, but often also to their old monkey friends; and after this mutual display they begin to play together. The young mandrill ceased spontaneously after a time to act in this manner toward his master, Von Fischer, but continued to do so toward persons who were strangers and to new monkeys. A young Cynopithecus niger never acted, excepting on one occasion, in this way toward his master, but frequently toward strangers, and continues to do so up to the present time. From these facts Von Fischer concludes thalf the monkeys which behaved in this manner before a looking-glass (viz., the mandrill, drill, Cynopithecus niger, Maca- cus rhesus and nemestrinus) acted as if their reflec- tion were a new acquaintance. The mandrill and drill, which have their hinder ends especially ornamented, display it even while quite young, more frequently and more ostentatiously than do the other kinds. Next in order comes Cynocephalus hamadruus, while the other species act in this manner seldomer. The individuals, however, of the same species vary in this respect, and some which were very shy never displayed their hinder ends. It deserves especial attention that Von Fischer has never seen any species purposely exhibit the hinder part of its body, if not at all colored. This remark applies to many individuals of Macacus cynomolgus and Cercocelus radi- atus (which is closely allied to M. rhesus), to three species of Cercopithecus and several American monkeys. The habit of turning the hinder ends as a greeting to an old friend or new acquaintance, which seems to us so odd, is SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE. 711 not really more so than the habits of many savages, for instance that of rubbing their bellies with their hands, or rubbing noses together. The habit with the mandrill and drill seems to be instinctive or inherited, as it was followed by very young animals; but it is modified or guided, like so many other instincts, by observation, for Von Fischer says that they take pains to make their display fully; and if made before two observers, they turn to him who seems to pay the most attention. With respect to the origin of the habit, Von Fischer remarks that his monkeys like to have their naked hinder ends patted or stroked, and that they then grunt with pleasure. They often also turn this part of their bodies to other monkeys to have bits of dirt picked off, and so no doubt it would be with respect to thorns. But the habit with adult animals is connected to a certain extent with sexual feelings, for Von Fischer watched through a glass door a female Cynopitliecus niger, and she, during several days, "umdretite und dem Miinnchen mit gur- gelnden Tonen die stark gerothete Sitzflache zeigte, was ich friiher nie an diesem Thier bemerkt hatte. Beim Anblick dieses Gegenstandes erregte sich das Mannchen sichtlich, denn es polterte heftig an den Staben, ebenfalls gurgelnde Laute ausstossend." As all the monkeys which have the hinder parts of their bodies more or less brightly colored live, according to Von Fischer, in open rocky places, he thinks that these colors serve to render one sex conspicuous at a distance to the other; but as monkeys are such gregarious animals I should have thought that there was no need for the sexes to recognize each other at a dis- tance. It seems to me more probable that the bright colors, whether on the face or hinder end, or, as in the mandrill, on both, serve as a sexual ornament and attrac- tion. Anyhow, as we now know that monkeys have the habit of turning their hinder ends toward other monkeys, it ceases to be at all surprising that it should have been this part of their bodies which bas been more or less decorated. The fact that it is only the monkeys thus characterized which, as far as at present known, act in this manner as a greeting toward other monkeys renders it doubtful whether the habit was first acquired from some independent cause, and that afterward the parts in ques- tion were colored as a sexual ornament; or whether the 712 THE DESCENT OF MAN. coloring and the habit of turning round were first acquired through variation and sexual selection, and that afterward the habit was retained as a sign of pleasure or as a greet- ing through the principle of inherited association. This principle apparently comes into play on many occasions; thus it is generally admitted that the songs of birds serve mainly as an attraction during the season of love, and that the leks, or great congregations of the black grouse, are connected with their courtship; but the habit of singing has been retained by some birds when they feel happy, for instance, by the common robin, and the habit of congre- gating has been retained by the black grouse during other seasons of the year. I beg leave to refer to one other point in relation to sexual selection. It has been objected that this form of selection, as far as the ornaments of the males are con- cerned, implies that all the females within the same dis- trict must possess and exercise exactly the same taste. It should, however, be observed, in the first place, that although the range of variation of a species may be very large it is by no means indefinite. I have elsewhere given a good instance of this fact in the pigeon, of which there are at least a hundred varieties differing widely in their colors, and at least a score of varieties of the fowl differing in the same kind of way; but the range of color in these two species is extremely distinct. Therefore the females of natural species cannot have an unlimited scope for their taste. In the second place, I presume that no supporter of the principle of sexual selection believes that the females select particular points of beauty in the males; they are merely excited or attracted in a greater degree by one male than by another, and this seems often to depend, especially with birds, on brilliant coloring. Even man, excepting perhaps an artist, does not analyze the slight differences in the features of the woman whom he may admire, on which her beauty depends. The male mandrill has not only the hinder end of his body, but his face gorgeously colored and marked with oblique ridges,, a yellow beard and other orna- ments. We may infer from what we see of the variation of animals under domestication that the above several ornaments of the mandrill vere gradually acquired by one individual varying a little in one way and another indi- vidual iii another way. The males which were the hand- SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE. 713 somest or the most attractive in any manner to the females would pair oftenest, and would leave rather more offspring than other males. The offspring of the former, although variously intercrossed, would either inherit the peculiarities of their fathers or transmit an increased tendency to vary in the same manner. Consequently the whole body of males inhabiting the same country would tend from the effects of constant intercrossing to become modified almost uniformly, but sometimes a little more in one character and sometimes in another, though at an extremely slow rate; all ultimately being thus rendered more attractive to the females. The process is like that which I have called unconscious selection by man, and of which I have given several instances. In one country the inhabitants value a fleet or light dog or horse, and in another country a heavier and more powerful one; in neither country is there any selection of individual animals with lighter or stronger bodies and limbs; nevertheless, after a considerable lapse of time, the individuals are found to have been modified in the desired manner almost uniformly, though differently in each country. In two absolutely distinct countries inhab- ited by the same species, the individuals of which can never, during long ages, have intermigrated and inter- crossed, and where, moreover, the variations will probably not have been identically the same, sexual selection might cause the males to differ. Nor does the belief appear to me altogether fanciful that two sets of females, surrounded by a very different environment, would be apt to acquire somewhat different tastes with respect to form, sound or color. However this may be, I have given in my " Descent of Man" instances of closely allied birds inhabiting dis- tinct countries, of which the young and the females cannot be distinguished, while the adult males differ considerably, and this may be attributed with much probability to the action of sexual selection. INDEX. Abbott, C., on the battles of seals, 571. Abductor of tlie fifth metatarsal, presence of, in man, 47. Abercrombie, Dr. , on disease of the brain affecting speech, 100. Abipones, marriage customs of the, 683. Abortion, prevalence of the practice of, 52. Abou-Simbel, caves of, 191. Abramis brama, 282. Abstraction, power of, in animals, 93. AcalUs, stridulation of, 346. Acanthodactylus capensis, sexual differences of color in, 405. Accentor modularis, 539. Acclimatization, difference of, in different races of men, 191. Achetidae, stridulation of the, 320, 321, 323; rudimentary stridulat* ing organs in female, 326. Acilius sulcatus, elytra of the female, 313. Acomus, development of spurs in the female of, 512. Acridiidse, stridulation of the, 320, 324; rudimentary stridulating organs in female, 326. Acromio-basilar muscle, and quadrupetal gait, 47. Acting, 203. Actinia, bright colors of, 294. Adams, Mr., migration of birds, 122; intelligence of nut-hatch, 466; on the Bombycilla carolinensis, 525. Admiral butterfly, 353. Adoption of the young of other animals by female monkeys, 79. Advancement in the organic scale, Von Baer's definition of, 186. Aeby, on the difference between the skulls of man and the quadrumana, 170. Esthetic faculty, not highly developed in savages, 105. Affection, maternal, 79; manifestation of, by animals, 79; parental and filial, partly the result of natural selection, 120; mutual, of birds, 467; shown by birds in confinement, for certain persons, 467. Africa, probably the birthplace of man, 177; South, crossed popu- lation of, 198. South, retention of color by the Dutch in, 219; South, portion of the sexes in the butterflies of, 283; tattooing practiced , 654; Northern, coiffure of natives of, 655. Agassiz L., on conscience in dogs, 117; on the coincidence of the races of man with zoological provinces, 193; on the number of species of man, 198; on the courtship of the land-snails, 297; on the brightness of the colors of male fishes during the breeding- season, 385; on the frontal protuberance of the males of Oeophagus and Cichla, 385, 392; male fishes hatching ova in their mouths, 391; -C 716 INDEX. sexual differences in color of chromids, 392; on the slight sexual differences of the South Americans, 640; on the tattooing of the Amazonian Indians, 657. Age, in relation to the transmission of characters in birds, 528; variation in accordance with, in birds, 551. Agelceus pho&niceus, 255, 472. Ageronia feronia, noise produced by, 349. Agrion, dimorphism in, 328, 829. Agrion Hambuni, sexes of, 328. Agrionidae, difference in the sexes of, 328. Agrotis exclamatioms, 358. Ague, tertian, dog suffering from, 8. Ainos, hairiness of the, 639. Aitchison, Mr., on sheep, 279. AUhurus polytmus, young of, 555. Albino birds, 476. Alca torda, young of, 553. Alces palmata, 587. Alder and Hancock, MM., on the nudi-branch mollusca, 298. Allen, J. A., vigor of birds earliest hatched, 240, 241; effect of difference of temperature, light, etc., on birds, 254, colors of birds, 480; on the relative size of the sexes of Callorhinus urtdnus, 588; on the name of Otaria jubata, 594; on the pairing of seals, 596; on sexual differences in the color of bats, 610; Allen, S., on the habits of Hoplopterus, 414; on the plumes of Herons, 444; on the vernal moult of Herodias biibulcus, 445. Alligator, courtship of the male, 250, 398; roaring of the male, 646. Amadavat, pugnacity of male, 416. Amadina Lathami, display of plumage by the male, 456; amadina castanotis, display of plumage by the male, 455. Amazons, butterflies of the, 283; fishes of the, 389. America, variation in the skulls of aborigines of, 29; wide range of aborigines of, 193; lice of the natives of, 193; general beardless- ness of the natives of, 639; North, butterflies of, 283; Indians of, women a cause of strife among the, 640; Indians of, their notions of female beauty, 659, 662; South, character of the natives of, 191; population of parts of, 197; piles of stone in, 204; extinction of the fossil horse of, 218, desert birds of, 558; slight sexual difference of the aborigines of, 640; prevalence of infanticide in, 675. American languages, often highly artificial, 103. Americans, wide geographical range of, 33; native, variability of, 198; and negroes, difference of, 224; aversion of, to hair on the face, 662. Ammophila, on the jaws of, 312. Ammotragm tragelaphus, hairy forelegs of, 606, 609. Amphibia, affinity of, to the ganoid fishes, 180; vocal organs of the, 646. Amphibians, 187, 394; breeding while immature, 551. Amphioxus, 181. Amphipoda, males sexually mature while young, 552. Amunoph III, negro character of features of, 192. Anal appendages of insects, 313. INDEX. 717 Analogous variation in the plumage of birds, 488. Anas, 525; anas acuta, male plumage of, 446; anas boschas, male plumage of, 446; anas histrionica, 552; anas punctata, 425. Anastomus oscitans, sexes and young of, 553; white nuptial plum- age of, 560. Anatidse, voices of, 425. Anaxjunius, differences in the sexes of, 328. Andaman islanders, susceptible to change of climate, 214. Anderson, Dr., on the tail of Macacus brunneus, 66; the Bufo nkimmensis, 396; sounds of EcMs carinata, 400. Andrana fulva, 331. Anglo-Saxons, estimation of the beard among the, 663. Animals, domesticated, more fertile than wild, 50; cruelty of savages to, 133; characters common to man and, 166; domestic, change of breeds of, 680. Annelida, 299; colors of, 299. Anobium tessellatum, sounds produced by, 347. Anolis cristatellus, male, crest of, 401; pugnacity of the male, 401; throat-pouch of, 402. Anser canadensis, 473; anser cygnoides, 471; knob at the base of the beak of, 484; anser hyperboreus, whiteness of, 560. Antelope, prong-horned, horns of, 265. Antelopes, generally polygamous, 246; horns of, 265, 575; canine teeth of some male, 572; use of horns of, 580; dorsel crests in, 606; dewlaps of, 608; winter change of two species of, 619; peculiar markings of, 621. Antennae, furnished with cushions in the male of Penthe, 313. Anthidium manicatum, large male of, 316. Anthocharis cardamines, 350, 354 ; sexual difference of color in, 364; anthocharis gemitia, 354; anthocharis sara, 354. Anthophora acervorum, large male of, 316 ; anthophora retusct, difference of the sexes in, 331. Anthropidse, 173. AntJius, molting of, 444. Antics of birds, 431. Antigua, Dr. Nicholson's observations on yellow fever in, 222. Antilocapra americana, horns of, 265, 575, 578. Antilope bezoartica, horned females of, 575, 577, 578; sexual differ- ence in the color of, 611 ; antilope Dorcas euchore, 575. Antilope euchore, horns of, 580; antilope montana, rudimentary canines in the young male of, 586; antilope niger, sing-sing, caama and gorgon, sexual differences in the colors of, 612; antilope oreas, horns of, 265; antilope saiga, polygamous habits of, 246; antilope strepsiceros, horns of, 265; antilope subgutturosa, absence of suborbital pits in, 604. Antipathy, shown by birds in confinement, to certain persons, 467. Ants, 167; large size of cerebral ganglia in, 60; soldier, large jaws of, 70; playing together, 77; memory in, 83; intercommunication of, by means of the antennae, 101; habits of; 167 ; difference of the sexes in, 330; recognition of each other by, after separation, 330; white, habits of, 330. Anura, 395. Apatania muliebris, male unknown, 287. 718 INDEX. Apathus, difference of the sexes in, 331. Apatura Iris, 348, 350. Apes, difference of the young, from the adult, 9; semi-erect atti- tude of some, 58; mastoid processes of, 59; influences of the jaw- muscles on the physiognomy of, 60; female, destitute of large canines, 71; building platforms, 93; imitative faculties of, 146; 3, 175; anthropomorphous, 175; probable speedy extermination of the, 177; Gratiolet on the evolution of, 202; canine teeth of male, 572; females of some, less hairy beneath than the males, 686; long- armed, their mode of progression, 58. Aphasia, Dr. Baternan on, 100. Apis mellifica, large male of, 316. Apollo, Greek statues of, 663. Apoplexy in Cebm Azarce, 7. Appendages, anal, of insects, 313. Approbation, influence of the love of, 124, 132, 148. Aprosmictus scapulatus, 521. Apm, proportion of sexes, 287. Aquatic birds, frequency of white plumage in, 561. Aqutta chrynaetos, 463. Arab women, elaborate and peculiar coiffure of, 666. Arabs, fertility of crosses with other races, 195; gashing of cheeks and temples among the, 655. Arachnida, 307. Arakhan, artificial widening of the forehead by the natives of, 665. Arboricola, young of, 533. Archeopteryx, 180. Arctiidse, coloration of the, 356. Ardea asha, rufescens and ccerulea, change of color in, 562, 563; ardea ccerulea, breeding in immature plumage, 552; ardea gularis,. change of plumage in, 563; ardea herodias, love-gestures of the male, 431; ardea ludoviciana, age of mature plumage in, 551; continued growth of crest and plumes in the male of, 552; ardea nycticorax, cries of, 417. Ardeola, young of, 534. Ardetta, changes of plumage in, 524. Argenteuil, 24. Argus pheasant, 435, 457, 526; display of plumage by the male, 451; ocellated spots of the, 488; gradation of characters in the, 494. Argyll, Duke of, on the physical weakness of man, 71; the fash- ioning of implements peculiar to man, 92; on the contest in man between right and wrong, 141; on the primitive civilization of man, 162; on the plumage of the male Argus pheasant, 451; on Urosticte Benjamini, 503; on the nests of birds, 515. Argynnis, coloring of the lower surface of, 356. Aricoris epitus, sexual differences in the wings of, 314. Aristocracy, increased beauty of the, 669. Arms, proportions of, in soldiers and sailors, 36; direction of the hair on the, 177; and hands, free use of, indirectly correlated with diminution of canines, 60. Arrest of development, 40, 41. Arrow-heads, stone, general resemblance of, 203- INDEX. 719 Arrows, use of, 203. Arteries, variations in the course of the, 30. Artery, effect of tying, upon the lateral channels, 36. Arthropoda, 299. Arts practiced by savages, 203. Ascension, colored incrustation on the rocks of, 298. Ascidia, affinity of the lancelet to, 181; tadpole-like larvae of, 181. Ascidians, 296; bright colors of some, 295. Asinus, Asiatic and African species of, 626; asinus taeniopus, 626. Ass, color- variations of the, 626. Ateles, effects of brandy on an, 8; absence of the thumb in, 57-, ateles beelzebuth, ears of 16; ateles marginatus, color of the ruff of 613; hair on the head of, 627. Ateuchus cicatricosus, habits of, 340. Ateuchus, stridulation of, 346. Athalia, proportions of the sexes in, 286. Atropus pulsatorius, 330. Attention, manifestations of, in animals, 83. Audouin, V., on a hymenopterous parasite with a sedentary male, 251. Audubon, J. J., on the pinioned goose, 119 ; on the speculum of Mergus cucullatus, 267; on the pugnacity of male birds, 411, 414; on courtship of Caprirnulgus, 416; on Tetrao cupido, 417; on Ardea nycticorax, 417; on Sturnella ludoviciana, 417; on the vocal organs of Tetrao cupido, 422; on the drumming of the male Tetrao umbel- lus, 426; on sounds produced by the nightjar, 426, 427; on Ardea herodias and Cathartes jota, 431, 432; on Mimus polyglottus, 686; on display in male birds, 447; on the spring change of color in some finches, 446; on migration of mocking thrushes, 467; recognition of a dog by a turkey, 468; selection of mate by female birds, 472; on the turkey, 468; on variation in the male scarlet tanager, 481; on the musk-rat, 619; on the habits of Pyranga &stiva, 515; on local differ- ences in the nests of the same species of birds, 519; on the habits of woodpeckers, 521 ; on Bombycilla carolinensis, 525 ; on young females of Pyranga cestiva acquiring male characters, 525; on the immature plumage of thrushes, 530; on the immature plumage of birds, 530; et seq., on birds breeding in immature plumage, 551; on the growth of the crest and plumes in the male Ardea ludoviciana, 551; on the change of color in some species of Ardea, 562. Audubon and Bachman, MM., on squirrels fighting, 570; on the Canadian lynx, 594. Aughey, Prof., on rattlesnakes, 401. Austen, N. L., on Anolis cristatellus, 401. Australia, not the birthplace of man, 176; half-castes killed by the natives of, 194; lice of the natives of, 193. Australia, South, variation in the skulls of aborigines of, 28. -Australians, color of new-born children of, 636; relative height of the sexes of, 638; women a cause of war among the, 640. Axis deer, sexual difference in the color of the, 612. Aymaras, measurements of the, 39; no grey hair among the, 637; hairlessness of the face in the, 639; long hair of the, 662. Azara, on the proportion of men and women among the Quaranys, 276; on Palamedea cornuta, 412; on the beards of the Quaranys, 720 INDEX. 639; on strife for women among the Guanas, 640 ; on infanticide, 659, 675; on the eradication of the eyebrows and eyelashes by the Indians of Paraguay, 662; on polyandry among the Guanas, 677; celi- bacy unknown among the savages of South America, 678; on the freedom of divorce among the Charruas, 683. Babbage, C., on the greater proportion of illegitimate female births, 276. Babirusa, tusks of the, 592. Baboon, revenge in a, 78; rage excited in, by reading, 80; mani- festation of memory by a, 83; employing a mat for shelter against the sun, 93; protected from punishment by its companions, 117; Cape, mane of the male, 594; Hamadryas, mane of the male, 594. Baboon, effects of intoxicating liquors on, 8; ears of, 17; diversity of the mental faculties in, 30; hands of, 56; habits of, 57; variability of the tail in, 65; manifestation of maternal affection by, 79; using stones and sticks as weapons, 92 ; co-operation of, 115 ; silence of, on plundering expeditions, 118; apparent polygamy of, 245; polyga- mous and social habits of, 674. Baboons, courtship of, 710. Bachman, Dr., on the fertility of mulattoes, 194. Baer, K . E. von, on embryonic development, 9 ; definition of advancement in the organic scale, 186. Bagehot, W., on the social virtues among primitive men, 132; slavery formerly beneficial, 133; on the value of obedience, 147; on human progress, 150; on the persistence of savage tribes in classical times, 208. Bailey, E. M., on the mode of fighting of the Italian buffalo, 580; on the fighting of stags, 582. Bain, A., on the sense of duty, 111; aid springing from sympathy, 116; on the basis of sympathy, 120; on the love of approbation, etc., 124; on the idea of beauty, 667. Baird, W. , on a difference in color between the males and females of some Entozoa, 294. Baker, Mr. , observation on the proportion of the sexes in pheas- ant-chicks, 280; Sir S., on the fondness of the Arabs for discordant music, 431; on sexual difference in the colors of an antelope, (512; on the elephant and rhinoceros attacking white or grey horses, 617; on the disfigurements practiced by the negroes, 617; on the gashing of the cheeks and temples practiced in Arab countries, 655; on the coiffure of the North Africans* 656; on the perforation of the lower lip by the women of Latooka, 656; on the distinctive characters of the coiffure of central African tribes, 656; on the coiffure of Arab women, 666. " Balz " of the black cock, 412, 460. Bantam, Sebright, 239, 270. Banteng, horns of, 576 ; sexual differences in the colors of the, 612. Banyal, color of the, 661. Barbarism, primitive, of civilized nations, 162. Barbs, filamentous, of the feathers, in certain birds, 437, 489. Barr, Mr., on sexual preference in dogs, 598. Barrago, F. , on the Simian resemblances of man, 3. Barrington, Daines, on the language of birds, 97; on the duckling INDEX. 721 of the lien, 418; on the object of the song of birds, 419; on the sing- ing of female birds, 420; on birds acquiring the songs of other birds, 420; on the muscles of the larynx in song birds, 421; on the want of the power of song by female birds, 513. Barrow, on the widow-bird, 457. Bartels, Dr., supernumerary mammae in men, 42. Bartlett, A. D., period of" hatching of bird's eggs, 187; on the tragopan, 249; on the development of the spurs in Crossoptilon auritum, 267; on the fighting of the males of Plectropterus yamben sis, 414; on the knot, 444; on display in male birds, 447; on the dis- play of plumage by the male Polyplectron, 449 ; on Crossoptilon auritum and Phasianus Wallichii, 454; on the habits of Lophophorus, 477; on the color of the mouth in Buceros bicornis, 484; on the incu- bation of the cassowary, 544; on the Cape Buffalo, 580; on the use of the horns of antelopes, 580; on the fighting of male wart-hogs, 593; on Ammotragus tragelaphus, 606; on the colors of Cercopithecus cephus, 614; on the colors of the faces of monkeys, 629; on the naked surfaces of monkeys, 686. Bartlett, on courting of Argus pheasant, 454. Bartram, on the courtship of the male allegator, 398. Basque language, highly artificial, 102. Bate, C. S., on the superior activity of male Crustacea, 250; on the proportions of the sexes in crabs, 288; on the chelae of Crustacea, 301; on the relative size of the sexes in Crustacea, 302; on the colors of Crustacea, 306. Bateman, Dr., tendency to imitation in certain diseased states, 82; on Aphasia, 100. Bates, H. W. , on variations in the form of the head of Amazonian Indians, 32; on the proportion of sexes among Amazonian butter- flies, 283; on sexual diiferences in the wings of butterflies, 314; on the field-cricket, 321; on Pyrodes pulcherrimus, 333; on the horns of Lamellicorn beetles, 334, 336; on the colors of Epicalice, etc., 350; on the coloration of tropical butterflies, 352: on the variability of Papilio Sesostris and Children, 362; on male and female butterflies inhabit- ing different stations, 364; on mimicry, 366; on the caterpillar of a Sphinx, 369; on the vocal organs of the umbrella-bird, 423; on the toucans, 560; on Brachyurus calmis, 629. Batokas, knocking out two upper incisors, 656. Batrachia, 395; eagerness of male, 250. Bats, scent-glands, 604; sexual differences in the color of, 610; fur of male frugivorous, 610. Battle, law of, 163; among beetles, 339; among birds, 408; among mammals, 570 et seq.; in man, 640. Beak, sexual difference in the forms of the, 408; in the color of the, 435. Beaks, of birds, bright colors of, 559. 'Beard, development of, in man, 636; analogy of the, in man and the quadrumana, 636; variation of the development of the, in dif- ferent races of men, 637; estimation of, among bearded nations 663; probable origin of the, 688; in monkeys, 171; of mammals, 607 Beautiful, taste for the, in birds, 466; in the quadrumana, 617. Beauty, sense of, in animals, 104; appreciation of, by birds, 469; influence of , 654, 657; variability of the standard of, 681; sense of, sufficiently permanent for action of sexua.l selection, 563, 712. 722 INDEX. Beavan, Lieut. , on the development of the horns in Cervus Eldi, 265 Beaver, instinct and intelligence of the, 75, 77; voice of the, 602. castoreurn of the, 604. Beavers, battles of male, 570. Bechstein, on female birds choosing the best singers among the males, 418; on rivalry in song-birds, 419; on the singing of female birds, 420; on birds acquiring the songs of other birds, 420; on pair- ing the canary and siskin, 472; on a sub- variety of the monk pigeon, 472; on spurred hens, 511. Beddoe, Dr., on causes of difference in stature, 35. Bee-eater, 421. Bees, 118; pollen-baskets and stings of, 70; destruction of drones and queens by, 120; female, secondary sexual characters of, 235; proportion of sexes, 286; difference of the sexes in color and sexual selection, 331. Beetle, luminous larva of a, 314. Beetles, 333; size of the cerebral ganglia in, 61 ; dilatation of the fore tarsi in male, 312; blind, 833; stridulation of, 341. Belgium, ancient inhabitants of, 207. Bell, Sir C., on the emotional muscles in man, 4; " snarling mus- cles," 46; on the hand, 57; Bell, T., on the numerical proportion of the sexes in moles, 279; on the newts, 394; on the croaking of the frog, 395; on the difference in the coloration of the sexes in Zootoca vivipara, 405; on moles fighting, 570. Bell-bird, sexual difference in the color of the, 440. Bell-birds, colors of, 560. Belt, Mr., on the nakedness of tropical mankind, 64; on a spider- monkey and eagle, 115; habits of ants, 168; Lampyridae distasteful to mammals, 314; mimicry of Leptalides, 368; colors of Nicaragua!! frogs, 396; display of humming-birds, 503; on the toucans, 560; pro- tective coloring of skunk, 621. Benevolence manifested by birds, 467. Bennett, A. W., attachment of mated birds, 466; on the habits of Dromaeus irroratus, 545; Bennett, D., on birds of paradise, 449. Berbers, fertility of crosses with other races, 195. Bernicla antarctica, colors of, 560. Bernicle gander pairing with a Canada goose, 471. Bert, M., crustaceans distinguish colors, 306. Bettoni, E., on local differences in the nests of Italian birds, 519. Beyle, M., see Bombet. Bhoteas, color of the beard in, 637. Bhringa, disciform tail-feathers of, 445. Bianconi, Prof., on structures as explained through mechanical principles, 27. Bibio, sexual differences in the genus, 317. Bichat, on beauty, 667. Bickes, proportion of sexes in man, 274. Bile, colored in many animals, 296. Bimana, 170. Birds, imitations of the songs of other birds by, 82; dreaming, 84; killed by telegraph wires, 90; language of, 97; sense of beauty in, 104; pleasure of, in incubation, 119; male, incubation by, 185; and reptiles, alliance of, 17; sexual differences in the beak of some, 236; INDEX. 723 migratory, arrival of the male before the female, 241; apparent rela- tion between polygamy and marked sexual differences in, 248; monogamous, becoming polygamous under domestication, 249; eagerness of male in pursuit of the female, 250; wild, numerical proportion of the sexes in, 280; secondary sexual characters of, 407; difference of size in the sexes of, 411; fights of male, witnessed by females, 414; display of male, to captivate the females, 416; close attention of, to the songs of others, 418; acquiring the song of their foster parents, 420; brilliant, rarely good songsters, 421; love-antics and dances of, 431; coloration of, 438 et seq.; moulting of, 442 et seq.; unpaired, 462; male, singing out of season, 465; mutual affection of, 466; in confinement, distinguish persons, 467; hybrid, production of, 470; Albino, 476; European, number of species of, 479; variability of, 479; geographical distribution of coloring, 480; gradation of secondary sexual characters in, 488; obscurely colored, building con- cealed nests, 516; young female, acquiring male characters, 525; breeding in immature plumage, 551; moulting of, 551; aquatic, fre- quency of white plumage in, 561; vocal courtship of, 646; naked skin of the head and neck in, 686. Birgus latro, habits of, 305. Birkbeck, Mr. , on the finding of new mates by golden eagles, 463. Birthplace of man, 176. Births, numerical proportions of the sexes in, in animals and man, 243, 244; male and female, numerical proportion of, in England, 274. Bischoff, Prof., on the agreement between the brains of man and of the orang, 6; figure of the embryo of the dog, 11; on the convo- lutions of the brain in the human fetus, 10; on the difference between the skulls of man and the quadrumana, 170; resemblance between the ape's and man's, 227. Bishop, J., on the vocal organs of frogs, 397; on the vocal organs of corvine birds, 421 ; on the trachea of the Merganser, 425. Bison, American, co-operation of, 115; mane of the male, 594. Bitterns, dwarf, coloration of the sexes of, 524. Biziura Idbata, musky odor of the male, 407; large size of male, 411. Blackbird, sexual differences in the, 248; proportion of the sexes in the, 281; acquisition of a song by, 421; color of the beak in the sexes of the, 435, 559; pairing with a thrush, 470; colors and nidifi- cation of the, 517; young of the, 554, 555; sexual difference in colora- tion of the, 559. Black-buck, Indian, sexual difference in the color of the, 612. Blackcap, arrival of the male, before the female, 240; young of the, 554. Black-cock, polygamous, 248; proportion of the sexes in the, 279; pugnacity and love-dance of the, 412; call of the, 425 ; moulting of the, 444; duration of the courtship of the, 460 ; and pheasant, hybrids of, 125; sexual difference in coloration of the, 559; crimson eye-cere of the, 559. Black-grouse, characters of young, 530, 537. Blacklock, Dr., on music, 653. Black wall, J., on the speaking of the magpie, 101; on the deser- tion of their young by swallows, 122; on the superior activity of 724 INDEX. male spiders, 250; on the proportion of the sexes in spiders, 287; on sexual variation of color in spiders, 307; on male spiders, 307. Bladder-nose Seal, hood of the, 603. Elaine, on the affections of dogs, 597. Blair, Dr. , on the relative liability of Europeans to yellow fever, 221. Blake, C. C., on the jaw from La Naulette, 46. Blakiston, Capt., on the American snipe, 428; on the dances of Tetrao phasianellus, 431. Blasius, Dr. , on the species of European birds, 480. Bledius taurus, hornlike processes of male, 338. Bleeding, tendency to profuse, 268. Blenkiron, Mr., on sexual preference in horses, 598. Blennies, crest developed on the head of male, during the breeding season, 385. Blethisa multipunctata, stridulation of, 343. Bloch, on the proportions of the sexes in fishes, 281. Blood, arterial, red color of, 296; pheasant, number of spurs in. 413. Blow-fly, sounds made by, 318. Bluebreast, red-throated, sexual differences of the, 537. Blumenbach, on Man, 32; on the large size of the nasal cavities in American aborigines, 38; on the position of man, 170; on the number of species of man, 199. Blyth, E., on the structure of the hand in the species of Hylobates, 57; observations on Indian crows, 116; on the development of the horns in the Koodoo and Eland antelopes, 265; on the pugnacity of the males of Oallicrex cristatns, 409; on the presence of spurs in the female Euplocamus erythrophthalmus, 413; on the pugnacity of the amadavat, 415; on the spoonbill, 425; on the moulting of Anthus, 444; on the moulting of bustards, plovers, and GaUus bankiva, 445; on the Indian honey-buzzard, 481 ; on sexual differences in the the color of the eyes of hornbills, 483; on Oriolus melanocephalus, 524; on Palceornis javanicus, 525; on the genus Ardetta, 524; on the peregrine falcon, 525; on young female birds acquiring male charac- ters, 524; on the immature plumage of birds, 529; on representative species of birds, 533; on the young of Turnix, 543; on anomalous young of Lanius rufus and Colymbus ylacialis, 550; on the sexes and young of the sparrows, 550; on dimorphism in some herons, 552; on the ascertainment of the sex of nestling bullfinches by pulling out breast feathers, 551; on orioles breeding in immature plumage, 552; on the sexes and young of Buphus and Anastomus, 553; on the young of the blackcap" and blackbird, 554, 555; on the young of the stonechat, 555; on the white plumage of Anastomus, 561; on the horns of Bovine animals, 575; on the horns of Antilope bezoartica, 575, 577; on the mode of fighting of Ovis cycloceros, 579; on the voice of the Gibbons, 602; on the crest of the male wild goat, 606; on the colors of Portax picta, 611; on the colors of Antilope bezoartica, 612; on the color of the Axis deer, 613; on sexual difference of color in Hylobates hoolock, 613 ; on the hog-deer, 624 ; on the beard and whiskers in a monkey becoming white with age, 637. Boar, wild, polygamous in India, 246; use of the tusks by the, 685; fighting of, 591. INDEX. 7554 Boardman, Mr., Albino birds in U. S., 476. Boitard and Corbie, MM., on the transmission of sexual peculiari- ties in pigeons, 261; on the antipathy shown by some female pigeons to certain males, 474. Bold, Mr., on the singing of a sterile hybrid canary, 419. Bombet, on the variability of the standard of beauty in Europe, 681. Bombus, difference of the sexes in, 331. Bombycida?, coloration of, 355; pairing of the, 360, colors of, 361. Bombycttla carolinensis, red appendages of, 525. Bombyx cynthia, 315; proportion of the sexes in, 282, 285; pairing of, 360; bombyx mori, difference of size of the male and female cocoons of, 315; pairing of, 360; bombyx pern yi, proportion of sexes of, 285; bombyx yamamai, 315; M. Personal on, 283; proportion of sexes of, 285. Bonaparte, C. L., on the call-notes of the wild turkey, 435. Bond, F., on the finding of new mates by crows, 463. Bone, implements of, skill displayed in making, 55. Boner, C., on the transfer of male characters to an old female chamois, 574; on the habits of stags, 587; on the pairing of red deer, 595. Bones, increase of, in length and thickness, when carrying a greater weight, 36. Boniz/j, P., difference of color in sexes of pigeons, 261. Bonnet monkey, 171. Bon wick, J., extinction of Tasmanians, 209. Boomerang, 164. Boreus hyemalis, scarcity of the male, 287. Bory St. Vincent, on the number of species of man, 199; on the colors of Labrus pavo, 388. Bos etruseus, 576; bos gaurus, horns of, 576; bos moschatus, 604; bos primigenius, 571; bos sondaicus, horns of, 576; colors of, 612. Botocudos, 163; mode of life of, 224; disfigurement of the ears and lower lip of the, 656. Boucher de Perthes. J. C. de, on the antiquity of man, 2. Bourbon, proportion of the sexes in a species of Papilio from, 283. Bourien, on the marriage customs of the savages of the Malay Archipelago, 683. Bovidae, dewlaps of, 608. Bower-birds, 461; habits of the, 432; ornamented playing-places of, 104, 469. Bows, use of, 203. Brachycephalic structure, possible explanation of, 63. Brachyura, 304. Brachyurus calvus, scarlet face of, 629. Bradley, Mr., abductor ossis metatarsi quinti in man, 47. Brain, of man, agreement of the, with that of lower animals, 6; convolutions of, in the human fetus, 10; influence of development of mental faculties upon the size of the, 60; influence of the devel- opment of, on the spinal column and skull, 62; larger in some exist' ing mammals than in their tertiary prototypes, 91; relation of the development of the, to the progress of language, 99; disease of the, affecting speech, 99; difference in. tbe convolutions of, in different 726 INDEX. races of men, 191; supplement on, by Prof. Huxley, 227; develop- ment of the gyri and sulci, 231. Brakenridge, Dr., on the influence of climate, 36. Brandt, A., on hairy men, 21. Braubach, Prof., on the quasi-religious feeling of a dog toward his master, 108; on the self-restraint of dogs, 117. Brauer, F. , on dimorphism in Neurothemis, 329. Brazil, skulls found in caves of, 192; population of, 197; compres- sion of the nose by the natives of, 665. Break between man and the apes, 177. Bream, proportion of the sexes in the, 282. Breeding, age of, in birds, 552; breeding season, sexual characters making their appearance in the, in birds, 443. Brehm, -on the effects of intoxicating liquors on monkeys, 8; on the recognition of women by male Cynocephali, 8; on the diversity of the mental faculties of monkeys, 31; on the habits of baboons, 57; on revenge taken by monkeys, 78; on manifestations of maternal affection by monkeys and baboons, 79; on the instinctive dread of monkeys for serpents, 80; on the use of stones as missils by baboons, 92; on a baboon using a mat for shelter from the sun, 93; on the signal-cries of monkeys, 98; on sentinels posted by monkeys, 114; on co-operation of animals, 114; on an eagle attacking a young Cerco- pithecus, 114; on baboons in confinement protecting one of their number from punishment, 117; on the habits of baboons when plundering, 108; on polygamy in Cynocephalus and Cebus, 246; on the numerical proportion of the sexes in birds, 280; on the love- dance of the blackcock, 412; Palamedea cwnuta, 414; on the habits of the black-grouse, 416; on sounds produced by birds of paradise, 427; on assemblages of grouse, 460; on the finding of new mates by birds, 464; on the fighting of wild boars, 591; on sexual differences in Mycetes, 613; on the habits of Cynocephalus hamadryas, 674. Brent, Mr., on the courtship of fowls, 473. Breslau, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 275. Bridgman, Laura, 99. Brimstone butterfly, 354; sexual difference of color in the, 365. British, ancient, tattooing practiced by, 655. Broca, Prof., on the occurrence of the supra- condyloid foramen in the human humerus, 24; anthropomorphous apes more bipedal than quadrupedal, 59; on the capacity of Parisian skulls at different periods, 61; comparison of modern and mediaeval skulls, 61; on tails of quadrupeds, 65; on the influence of natural selection, 68; on hybridity in man, 194; on human remains from Les Eyzies, 207; on the cause of the difference between Europeans and Hindoos, 218. Brodie, Sir B., on the origin of the moral sense in man, 111. Bronn, H. G., on the copulation of insects of distinct species, 312. Bronze period, men of, in Europe, 145. Brown, R., sentinels of seals generally females, 114; on the bat- tles of seals, 571; on the narwhal, 572; on the occasional absence of the tusks in the female walrus, 572; on the bladder- nose seal, 603; on the colors of the sexes in Phoca Grcenlandica, 611; on the apprecia- tion of music by seals, 649; on plants used as love-philters, by North American women, 659. Browne, Dr. Crichton, injury to infants during parturition, 276. INDEX. 727 Brown- Sequard, Dr., on the inheritance of the effects of opera- tions by guinea-pigs, 67, 689. Bruce, on the use of the elephant's tusks, 578. Brulerie, P. de la, on the habits of Ateuchus cicatricosua, 340; on the stridulation of Ateuchus, 346. Briinnich, on the pied ravens of the Feroe Islands, 482. Bryant, Dr., preference of tame pigeon for wild mate, 475; Bry- ant, Capt. , on the courtship of Callorhinus ursinus, 596. Bubas bison, thoracic projection of, 337. Bubulus caffer, use of horns, 580. Bucephalus capensis, difference of the sexes of, in color, 398. B-uceros, nidification and incubation of, 516 ; buceros bicornis, sexual differences in the coloring of the casque, beak, and mouth in, 484; buceros corrugatus, sexual differences in the beak, 435. Buchner, L., on the origin of man, 3; on the use of the human foot as a prehensile organ, 58; on the mode of progession of the apes, 58; on want of self-consciousness, etc., in savages, 94. Bucholz, Dr., quarrels of chamaeleons, 405. Buckinghamshire, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 274. Buckland, F., on the numerical proportion of the sexes in rats, 279; on the proportion of the sexes in the trout, 282; on Chimcera monstrosn, 385. Buckland, W., on the complexity of crinoids, 103. Buckler, W., proportion of sexes of Lepidoptera reared by, 285. Bucorax abyssinicus, inflation of the neck-wattle of the male during courtship, 435. Budytes Rail, 240. Buffalo, Cape, 580; Indian, horns of the, 576; Italian, mode of fighting of the, 580. Buffon, on the number of species of man, 199. Bufo sikimmenm, 396. Bugs, 318. Buist, R. , on the proportion of the sexes in salmon, 281 ; on the pugnacity of the male salmon, 377. Bulbul, pugnacity of the male, 409; display of under tail-coverts by the male, 456. Bull, mode of fighting of the, 579; curled frontal hair of the, 608. Buller, Dr., on the Huia, 236; the attachment of birdo, 466. Bullfinch, sexual differences in the, 248 ; piping, 418; female, singing of the, 420; courtship of the, 455; widowed, finding a new mate, 464; attacking a reed-bunting, 468; nestling, sex ascertained by pulling out breast feathers, 551. Bullfinches, distinguishing persons, 467; rivalry of female, 477. Bulls, two young, attacking an old one, 115; wild, battles of, 571. Bull-trout, male, coloring of, during the breeding-season, 386. -Bunting, reed, head feathers of the male, 455; attacked by a bull- finch, 468. Buntings, characters of young, 529. Buphus coromandus, sexes and young of, 553; change of color in, 563. Burchell, Dr., on the zebra, 623; on the extravagance of a Bush- woman in adorning herself, 658 ; celibacy unknown among the 728 INDEX. savages of South Africa, 678; on the marriage-customs of the Bush- women, 684. Burke, on the number of species of man, 199. Burmese, color of the beard in, 687. Burton, Capt., on negro ideas of female beauty, 660; on a universal ideal of beauty, 664. Bushmen, 72; marriage among, 684. Bushwoman, extravagant ornamentation of a, 658. Bush women, hair of, 191 ; marriage-customs of, 684. Bustard, throat- pouch of the male, 423; humming noise produced by a male, 429; Indian, ear-tufts of, 436. Bustards, occurrence of sexual differences and of polygamy among the, 248; love-gestures of the male, 432; double moult in, 443, 444. Butler, A. G., on sexual differences in the wings of Aricoris epitus, 314; courtship, of butterflies, 348; on the coloring of the sexes in species of Theda, 351; on ,the resemblance of Iphia-s glaucippe to a leaf, 354; on the rejection of certain moths and caterpillars by lizards and frogs, 370. Butterfly, noise produced by a, 349; Emperor, 348, 350; meadow brown, instability of the oscellated spots of, 486. Butterflies, proportion of the sexes in, 283; forelegs atrophied in some males, 314; sexual difference in the neuration of the wings of, 314; pugnacity of 'male, 348; protective resemblances of the lower surface of, 353; display of the wings by, 356; white, alighting upon bits of paper, 359; attracted by a dead specimen of the same species, 360; courtship of, 360; male and female inhabiting different stations, 364. Buxton, C., observations on macaws, 115; on an instance of benev- olence in a parrot, 467. Buzzard, Indian honey, variation the crest of, 481. Cabbage butterflies, 354. Cachalot, large head of the male, 573. Cadences, musical perception of, by animals, 648. Caecum, 22; large, in the early progenitors of man, 182. Cairina moschata, pugnacity of the male, 411. Californian Indians, decrease of, 291. Callianassa, chelae of, figured, 302. CcMidryas, colors of sexes, 361 . Callionymus lyra, characters of the male, 381. Oallorhinus ur sinus, relative size of the sexes of, 588; courtship of, 596. Calotes maria, 406; Calotes nignlabris, sexual difference in the color of, 405. Cambridge, O. Pickard, on the sexes of spiders, 287; on the size of male NephUa, 309. Camel, canine teeth of male, 572, 586. Campbell, J., on the Indian elephant, 246; on the proportion of male and female births in the harems of Siam, 277. Campylopterus hemileucurus, 281. Canaries distingushing persons, 467. Canary, polygamy of the, 249; change of plumage in, after moult- ing, 269; female, selecting the best singing male, 418; sterile hybrid, singing of a, 419; female, singing of the, 420; selecting a greenfinch, 472; and siskin, pairing of, 473. INDEX. 729 Cancer pagurus, 301. Canestrini, G., on rudimentary characters and the origin of man, 8: on rudimentary characters, 12; on the movement of the ear in man, 15; on the variability of the vermiform appendage in man, 23; on the abnormal division of the malar bone in man, 44; on abnormal conditions of the human uterus, 44; on the persistence of the frontal suture in man, 44; on the proportion of the sexes in silk- moths, 282, 284; secondary sexual characters of spiders, 307. Canfield, Dr., on the horns of the Antilocapra, 265. Canine teeth in man, 45; diminution of, in man, 60; diminution of, in horses, 60; disappearance of, in male ruurnants, 60; large in the early progenitors of man, 182. Canines and horns, inverse development of, 586. Canoes, use of, 54, 205. Canthans, difference of color in the sexes of a species of, 333. Cantharm lineatus, 386. Capercailzie, polygamous, 248; proportion of the sexes in the, 280; pugnacity of the male, 412; pairing of the, 416; autumn meetings of the, 420; call of the, 425; duration of the courtship of, 460; behaviour of the female, 476; inconvenience of black color to the female, 505; sexual difference in the coloration of the, 559; crimson eyecere of the male, 559. Capitonidae, colors and nidification of the, 518. Capra mgagrus, 579; crest of the male, 606; sexual difference in the color of, 612. Capreolus Sihiricus subecaudatus, 619. Caprice, common to man and animals, 105. Caprimulgus, noise made by the males of some species of, with their wings, 426; Caprimulgus nrginianus, pairing of, 416. Carabidas, 343. Carbonnier, on the natural history of the pike, 281 ; on the rela- tive size of the sexes in fishes, 380; courtship of Chinese Macropus, Carcineutes, sexual difference of color hi, 520. Carcinus m&nas, 303, 304. Cardinalis mrginianus, 255. Carduelis elegans, sexual differences of the beak in, 408. Carnivora, marine, polygamous habits of, 247 ; sexual differences in the colors of, 610. Carp, numerical proportion of the sexes in the, 282. Carr, R., on the peewit, 414. Carrier pigeon, late development of the wattle in the, 269. Carrion beetles, stridulation of, 342. Carrion-hawk, bright colored female of, 546. Carus, Prof. V. , on the development of the horns in merino sheep. 266; on antlers of red deer, 581. Cassowary, sexes and incubation of the, 544. Castnia, mode of holding wings, 357. Castoreum, 604. Castration, effects of, 577. Casua/riwi galeatus, 544. Cat, convoluted body in the extremity of a tail of a, 26; sick, sym- pathy of a dog with a, 116. 730 INDEX. Cataract in Cebus Azara, 7. Catarrh, liability of Cebus Azarce to, 7. Catarridne monkeys, 174. Caterpillars, bright colors of, 868. Cathartes aura, 473; cathartes jota, love-gestures of the male, 432, Catlin, G., correlation of color and texture of hair in the Mandans, 225; on the development of the beard among North American In- dians, 639; on the great length of the hair in some North American tribes, 662. Caton, J. D. , on the development of the horns in Cenus mrginia- nus and strongyloceros, 265; on the wild turkey, 525; on the pres- ence of traces of horns in the female wapiti, 575*; on the fighting of deer, 582; on the crest of the male wapiti, 606; on the colors of the Virginian deer, 611; on sexual differences of color in the wapiti, 612; on the spots of the Viginian deer, 624. Cats, dreaming, 84; tortoise-shell, 260, 262, 269; enticed by val- erian, 605; colors of, 620. Cattle, rapid increase of, in South America, 53; domestic, lighter in winter in Siberia, 260; horns of, 266, 576; domestic, sexual differ- ences of, late developed, 269, numerical proportion of the sexes in, 279. Caudal vertebrae, number of, in macaques and baboons, 65; basal of monkeys, imbedded in the body, 66. Cavolini, observations on Serranus, 184. Cebus, maternal affection in a, 79; gradation of species of, 199; cebus apella, 233; cebus azarce, liability of, to the same diseases as man, 7 ; distinct sounds produced by 95 ; early maturity of the female, 636; cebus capucinus, polygamous, 245; sexual differences of color in, 613; hair on the head of, 627; cebus vetterosus, hair on the head of, 627. Cecidomyiidae, proportions of the sexes in, 286. Celibacy, unknown among the savages of South Africa and South America, 678. Centipedes, 310. Cephalopoda, absence of secondary sexual characters in, 297. Cephalopterus ornatus, 423; cephalopterus penduliger, 424. Cerambyx heros, stridulant organ of, 343. Ceratodus, paddle of, 42. Ceratophora aspera, nasal appendages of, 403 ; ceratophora stod. dartii, nasal horn of, 403. Cerceris, habits of, 330. Cercocebus cethiops, whiskers, etc. , of, 629. Cercopithecus, young, seized by an eagle and rescued by the troop, 115; definition of species of, 199; cercopithecus cephus, sexual differ- ence of color in, 614, 630; cercopithecus cynosurus and griseo-viridis, color of the scrotum in, 614; cercopithecus Diana, sexual differences of color in, 614, 630; cercopithecus griseo-viridis, 114; cercopithecus petaurista, whiskers, etc., of, 627. Ceres, of birds, bright colors of, 559. Ceriornis Temminckii, swelling of the wattles of the male during courtship, 434. Cervulus, weapons of, 586; cervulus moschatus, rudimentary horns of the female, 574. INDEX. 731 Germs (dees, 265; cervus campestris, odor of, 604; cervus canadensis, traces of horns in the female, 574; attacking a man, 582; sexual dif- ference in the color of, 612; cervus elaphus, battles of male, 571; horns of, with numerous points, 581; long hairs on the throat of, 595; cervus eldi, 265. Cervus mantchuricus, 623 ; cervus paludosus, colors of, 613 ; cervus strongyloceros, 265 ; cervus virginianus, 265 ; horns of, in course of modification, 584. Ceryle, male black-belted in some species of, 520. Cetacea, nakedness of, 63. Ceylon, frequent absence of beard in the natives of, 638. Chaffinch, proportion of the sexes in the, 280; courtship of the, 456. Chaffinches, 419; new mates found by, 464. Clialcophaps indicus, characters of young, 529. Chalcosoma atlas, sexual differences of, 334. Cham&leo, sexual differences in the genus, 403; combats of, 405; bifarcus, 403, 404; Owenii, 404; pumilus, 405. Chamaspetes unicolor, modified wing-feather in the male, 428. Chameleons, 402. Chamois, danger-signals of, 114; transfer of male characters to an old female, 574. Champneys, Mr., acromio-basilar muscle and quadrupedal gait, 47. Chapman, Dr., on stridulation in Scolytus, 342. Chapuis, Dr. , on the transmission of sexual peculiarites in pigeons, 261; on streaked Belgian pigeons, 269, 507. Char, male, coloring of, during the breeding season, 386. Characters, male, developed in females, 257; secondary sexual, transmitted through both sexes, 257; natural, artificial, exaggeration of, by man, 664. Charadrius Maticula, and pluvialis sexes and young of, 553. Chardiu on the Persians, 669. Charms, worn by women, 659. Charruas, freedom of divorce arnomg the, 682. Chasmorhynchus, difference of color in the sexes of, 441; colors of, 560; \chft8morhynchus niveus, 441; chasmorhynchus nudicollis, 441; cJiasmorhynchus tricarunculatus, 441. Chastity, early estimation of, 134. Chatterers, sexual differences in, 248. Cheever, Rev. H. T., census of the Sandwich Islands, 290. Cheiropetra, absence of secondary sexual characters in, 247. Chelae of Crustacea, 301, 307. Cfielonia, sexual differences in, 397.' Chenalopex cegyptiacus, wing-knobs of, 414. Cheraprogne, 445, 476. Chest, proportions of, in soldiers and sailors, 37; large, of the Quechua and Aymara Indians, 38. Chevrotains, canine teeth of, 586. Chiasognathus, stridulation of, 346; chiasognathus grantii, mand- ibles of, 340. Children, legitimate and illegitimate, proportion of the sexes in, 276. Chiloe, lice of the natives of, 193; population of, 197. Chimwra monstrosa, bony process on the head of the male, 386. 732 INDEX. Chimseroid fishes, prehensile organs of male, 375. Chimpanzee, 640; ears of the, 16; representatives of the eyebrows in the, 21; hands of the, 56; absence of mastoid processes in the, 59; platforms built by the, 75; cracking nuts with a stone, 91; direction of the hair on the arms of the, 172; supposed evolution of the, 202; polygamous and social habits of the, 674. China, North, idea of female beauty in, 659; China, Southern, in- habitants of, 224. Chinese, use of flint tools by the, 164; difficulty of distinguishing the races of the, 190; color of the beard in, 637; general beardless- ness of the, 639; opinions of the, on the appearance of Europeans and Cingalese, 659; compression of the feet of, 665. Chinsurdi, his opinion of beards, 657, 663. CJdamydera maculata, 433. CMoeon, pedunculated eyes of the male of, 311. CMoephaga, coloration of the sexes in, 524. Chlorocoelus tanana (figured), 323. Chorda dorsalis, 183. Chough, red beak of the, 559. Chromidae, frontal protuberance in male, 385; sexual differences in color of, 392. Chrysemys pieta, long claws of the male, 397. C hrysococcyx, characters of young of, 529. Chrysomelidae, stridulation of, 342. ; Cicada pruinosa, 320; cicada geptendecim, 319. Cicadae, songs of the, 319; rudimentary sound-organs in females of, 326. Cicatrix of a burn, causing modification of the facial bones, 62. Cichla, frontal protuberance of male, 385. Cirnetiere du Sud, Paris, 24. Cincloramphus cruralis, large size of male, 411. Cinclus aquaticus, 518. Cingalese, Chinese opinion of the appearance of the, 659. Cirripedes, complemental males of, 235. Civilization, effects of, upon natural selection, 151; influence of, in the competition of nations, 208. Clanging of geese, etc., 418. Claparede, E., on natural selection applied to man, 55. Clarke, on the marriage-customs of Kalmucks, 683. Classification, 168. Claus, C., on the sexes of Saphirina, 306. Cleft-palate, inherited, 40. Climacteris erythrops, sexes of, 546. Climate, 35; cool, favorable to human progress, 150; power of supporting extremes of, by man, 207; want of connection of, with color, 219; direct action of, on colors of birds, 480. Cloaca, existence of a, in the early progenitors of man, 182. Cloacal passage existing in the human embryo, 10. Clubs, used as weapons before dispersion of mankind, 204. Clucking of fowls, 417. Clythra 4-punctata, stridulation of, 342. Coan, Mr., Sandwich Islanders, 213. Cobbe, Miss, on morality in hypothetical bee- community, 113. INDEX. 733 Cobra, ingenuity of a, 399. Coccus, 167. Coccyx, 25; in the human embryo, 10; convoluted body at the extremity of the, 25; imbedded in the body, 66. Cochin-China, notions of beauty of the inhabitants of, 659, 661. Cock, blind, fed by its companion, 116; game, killing a kite, 412; comb and wattles of the, 457; preference shown by the, for the young hens, 477; game, transparent zone in the hackles of a, 489. Cock of the rock, 460. Cockatoos, 559, 560, 562; nestling, 467; black, immature plumage of, 582. Ccelenterata, absence of secondary sexual characters in, 494. Coffee, fondness of monkeys for, 7. Cold, supposed effects of, 35; power of supporting, by man, 207. Coloptera, 333; stridulation of, 322; stridulant organs of. discussed, 344. Colias edusa and Jiynle, 361. Collingwood, C., on the pugnacity of the butterflies of Borneo, 348; on butterflies being attracted by a dead specimen of the same species, 360. Colobus, absence of the thumb, 57. Colombia, flattened heads of savages of, 655. Colonists, success of the English as, 160. Coloration, protective, in birds, 556. Color, supposed to be dependent on light and heat, 36; correlation of, with immunity from certain poisons and parasites, 220; purpose of, in lepidoptera, 359; relation of, to sexual functions in fishes, 388; difference of, in the sexes of snakes, 398; sexual differences of, in lizards, 405; influence of, in the pairing of birds of different species, 472; relation of, to nidification, 515, 519; sexual differences of, in mammals, 609, 616; recognition of, by quadrupeds, 617; of children, in different races of man, 635; of the skin in man, 690. Colors, admired alike by man and animals, 104; bright, due to sexual selection, 295; bright, among the lower animals, 295, .296; bright, protective to butterflies and moths, 354; bright, in male fishes, 380, 385; transmission of, in birds, 509. Colquhoun, example of reasoning in a retriever, 88. Columba passerina, young of, 532. Colymb-us glacialis, anomalous young of, 550. Comb, development of, in fowls, 270. Combs and wattles in male birds, 457. Community, preservation of variations useful to the, by natural selection, 70. Complexion, different in men and women, in an African tribe. 634, Compositse, gradation of species among the, 199. Comte, C., on the expression of the ideal of beauty by sculpture, 663. Conditions of life, action of changed, upon man, 34; influence of, on plumage of birds, 538. Condor, eyes and comb of the, 484. Conjugations, origin of, 103. Conscience, 110, 131, 143; absence of, in some criminals, 131. Constitution, difference of, in different races of men, 191. 734 INDEX. Consumption, liability of Cebus Azarce to, 7; connection betweep complexion and, 221. Convergence of characters, 201. Cooing of pigeons and doves, 425. Cook, Capt. , on the nobles of the Sandwich Islands, 669. Cope, E. D., on the Dinosauria, 180. Cophotis ceylanica, sexual differences of, 402, 405. Copris, 336; copris isidis, sexual differences of, 335; copris lunaris, stridulation of, 343. Corals, bright colors of, 295. Coral-snakes, 400. Cordylus, sexual difference of color in a species of, 405. Corfu, habits of the chaffinch in, 281. Cornelius, on the proportion of the sexes in Lucanus Cervtis, 286. Corpora Wolifina, 183; agreement of, with the kidneys of fishes, 10. Correlated variation, 49. '.. Correlation, influence of, in the production of races, 225.** / * Corse, on the mode of fighting of the elephant, <685. Corvus corone, 463. ; Cormis graculus, red beak of, 559 ; Corvus pica, nuptial assembly of, 461. Corydalis cornutus, large jaws of the male, 312. Cosmetornis, 457, 526. Cosmetornis vexillarius, elongation of wing-feathers in, 436, 457. Cotingidae, sexual differences in, 248; coloration of the sexes of, 523; resemblance of the females of distinct species of, 535. Coitus scorpius, sexual differences in, 382. Coulter, Dr., on the Californian Indians, 291. Counting, origin of, 163; limited power of, in primeval man, 205. Courage, variability of, in the same species, 78; universal high appreciation of, 139; importance of, 147; characteristic of men, 644. Courtship, greater eagerness of males in, 250; of fishes, 376, 386; of birds, 417, 426, 460. Cow, winter change of color, 619. Crab, devil, 304; crab, shore, habits of, 303. Crabro cribra/rius, dilated tibiae of the male, 313. Crabs, proportions of the sexes in, 288. Cranz, on the inheritance of dexterity in seal-catching, 37. Crawfurd, on the number of species of man, 199. Crenilabrus massa and C. melops, nests, built by, 391. Crest, origin of, in Polish fowls, 261. Crests, of birds, difference of, in the sexes, 533; dorsal hairy, of mammals, 606. Cricket, field, stridulation of the, 320, 321; pugnacity of male, 327; cricket, house, stridulations of the, 321. Crickets, sexual differences in, 328. Crinoids, complexity of, 103. Crioceridse, stridulation of the, 342. Croaking of frogs, 397. Crocodiles, musky odor of, during the breeding season, 398. Crocodilia, 398. Crossbills, characters of young, 529. Crosses in man, 196. Crossing of races, effects of the, 218. INDEX. 735 CrossoptUon auritum, 454, 514, 538; adornment of both sexes of, 267; sexes alike in, 524. Crotch, GK R., on the stridulation of beetles, 342, 345, on the stridulation of Heliopathes, 345; on the stridulation of Acalles, 346; habit of female deer at breeding time, 574. Crow Indians, long hair of the, 662; young of the, 549. Crows, 559; vocal organs of the, 421: living in triplets, 465; crows, carrion, new mates found by, 463; crows, Indian, feeding their blind companions, 116. Cruelty of savages to animals, 133. Crustacea, parasitic, loss of limbs by female, 235; prehensible feet and antennae of, 237; male, more active than female, 250; partheno- genesis in, 287; secondary sexual characters of, 299; amphipod, males sexually mature while young, 552; auditory hairs of, 648. Crystal worn in the lower lip by some Central African women, 656. Cuckoo fowls, 270. Culicidse, 235, 318; attracted by each other's humming, 318. Cullen, Dr. , on the throat-pouch of the male bustard, 423. Cultivation of plants, probable origin of, 151. Cupples, Mr., on tbe numerical proportion of the sexes in dogs, sheep and cattle, 279; on tbe Scotch deerhound, 589; on sexual preference in dogs, 597. Curculionidae, sexual difference in length of snout in some, 236; hornlike processes in male, 338; musical, 341, 342. Curiosity manifestations of, by animals, 80. Curlews, double moult in, 442. Cursores, comparative absence of sexual differences among the, 248. Curtis, J., on the proportion of the sexes in Athalia, 286. Cuvier, P., on the recognition of women by male quadrumana, 9; Cuvier, Q., on the number of caudal vertebrae in the mandril, 65; on instinct and intelligence, 75; views of, as to the position of man, 170; on the position of the seals, 170; on Hectocotyle, 297. Cyanalcyon, sexual difference in colors of, 520; immature plumage of, 532. ' Cyanecula suecica, sexual differences of, 537. Cychrus, sounds produced by, 345. Cycnia mendica, sexual difference of, in color, 358. Cygnus ferus, trachea of, 424; cygnus immutdbilis, 550; cygnus olor, white young of, 550. Cyllo Leda, instability of the ocellated spots of, 486. Cynanthus , variation in the genus, 481. Cynipidae, proportion of the sexes in, 286. Cynocephalus, difference of the young from the adult, 9; male recognition of women by, 9; polygamous babits of species of, 246; cynocephalus babouin, 710; cynocephalus chacma, 79; cynocephalus gelada, 92; cynocephalus hamadryas, 92, 674; sexual difference of color in, 614, 710; cynocephalus leucophus, colors of the sexes of, 614, 710; cynocephalus mormon, colors of the male, 614, 710 ; Cyno- cephalus porcarius, mane of tbe male, 594; cynocephalus sphinx, 710. (Jynopithecus niger, ear of, 18. Cypridina, proportions of the sexes in, 287. Cyprinidae, proportion of the sexes in the, 282; cyprinidae, Indian, 736 INDEX. Cyprinodontidaj, sexual differences in the, 380, 382. Cyprinus auratus, 388. Cypris, relations of the sexes in, 287. Cyrtodactylus rubidus, 402. Cystophora cristata, hood of, 603. Dacelo, sexual difference of color in, 520; daeelo gaudichaudi, young male of, 532. Dal-ripa, a kind of ptarmigan, 280. Damcdis albifrons, peculiar markings of, 621 ; damalis pygarga, peculiar markings of, 621. Dampness of climate, supposed influence of, on the color of the skin, 35, 220. Danaidse, 350. Dances of birds, 431. Dancing, universality of, 203. Danger signals of animal, 114. Daniell, Dr., his experience of residence in West Africa, 222. Darfur, protuberances artificially produced by natives of, 655. Darwin, F., on the stridulatio^ of Dermestes murinus, 342. Dasychira pudibunda, sexual difference of color in, 358. Davis, A. H., on the pugnacity of the male stag-beetle, 339; Davis, J. B., on the capacity of the skull in various races of men, 60; on the beards of the Polynesians, 639. Death's Head Sphinx, 349. Death-rate higher in towns than in rural districts, 157. Death-tick, 347. De Candolle, Alph., on a case of inherited power of moving the scalp, 14. Declensions, origin of, 103. Decoration in birds, 434. Decticus, 323. Deer, 265; development of the horns in, 265; spots of young, 529, 624; horns of, 573, 578; use of horns of, 582, 590; horns of a, in course of modification, 584; size of the horns of. 587; female, pair- ing with one male, while others are fighting for her, 595; male, attracted by the voice of the female, 600; male, odor emitted by 605; Axis, sexual difference in the color of the, 612; fallow, different colored herds of, 617; Mantchurian, 623; Virginian, 624; color of the, not affected by castration, 611; colors of, 612. Deerhound, Scotch, greater size of the male, 269, 589. Defensive orders of mammals, 590. De Qeer, C. , on a female spider destroying a male, 808. De Kay, Dr.. on the bladder-nose seal, 603. Delorenzi, U., division of malar bone, 44. Demerara, yellow fever in, 221. Dendrocygna, 529. Dendrophiln fnintalis, young of , 555. Denison, Sir W., manner of ridding themselves of vermin among the Australians, 64; extinction of Tasmanians, 209. Denny, H., on the lice of domestic animals, 193. Dermestes murinus, stridulation of, 342. Descent tracod through the mother alone, 672. Deserts, protective coloring of animals inhabiting, 557. INDEX. 737 Desmarest, on the absence of suborbital pits in Antilope subyuttu- rosa, 605; on the whiskers of Macacus, 607; on the color of the opossum, 609; on the colors of the sexes of Mus minutus, 610; on the coloring of the ocelot, 610; on the colors of seals, 610; on Anti- lope caama, 612; on the colors of goats, 613; on sexual difference of color in Ateles marginatus, 613; on the mandrill, 614; on Macacus cynomolgus, 636. Deemoulins, on the number of species of man, 199; on the musk- deer, 605. Desor, on the imitation of man by monkeys, 82. Despine, P., on criminals destitute of conscious, 131. Development, embryonic, of man, 9, 10, 12; correlated, 484. Devil, not believed in by the Fuegians, 107. Devil-crab, 304. Devonian, fossil insect from the, 327. Dewlaps, of cattle and antelopes, 608. Diadema, sexual differences of coloring in the species of, 350. Diamond-beetles, bright colors of, 333. Diastema, occurrence of, in man, 46. Diastylidae, proportion of the sexes in, 287. Dicrurus, racket-shaped feathers in, 438 ; nidification of, 516; dicrurus macrocercus, change of plumage in, 524. DidelpMs opossum, sexual difference in the color of, 609. Differences, comparative, between different species of birds of the same sex, 536. Digits, supernumerary, more frequent in men than in women, 253 ; supernumerary, inheritance of, 262 ; supernumerary, early development of, 268. Dimorphism in females of water-beetles, 313; in Neurothemis and Agnon, 329. Dipdorus, on the absence of beard in the natives of Ceylon, 638. Dipelicus Cantori, sexual differences of, 335. Diplopoda, prehensile limbs of the male, 310. Dipsas cynodon, sexual difference in the color of, 398. Diptera, 317. Disease, generated by the contact of distinct peoples, 208, Diseases, common to man and the lower animals, 7; difference of liability to, in different races of men, 191; new, effects of, upon savages, 208; sexually limited, 268. Display, coloration of Lepidoptera for, 356; of plumage by male birds, 447, 456. Distribution, wide, of man, 54 ; geographical, as evidence of specific distinctness in man, 192. Disuse, effects of, in producing rudimentary organs, 13; and use of parts, effects of, 36; of parts, influence of, on the races of men, 224. Divorce, freedom of, among the Charruas, 682. Dixon, E. S. on the pairing of different species of geese, 471; on the courtship of peafowl, 477. Dobrizhoffer, on the marriage customs of the Abipones, 684. Dobson, Dr., on the Cheiroptera, 247; scent-glands of bats, 604; frugivorous bats, 610. Dogs, suffering from tertian ague, 8; memory of, 83; dreaming, 738 INDEX. 84; diverging when drawing sledges over thin ice, 85; exercise of reasoning faculties by, 88; domestic, progress of, in moral qualities, 90; distinct tones uttered by, 95; parallelism between his affection for his master and religious feeling, 108 ; sociability of the, 113; sympathy of, with a sick cat, 116; sympathy of, with his master, 116 ; their possession of conscience, 117; possible use of the hair on the fore legs of the, 172; races of the, 201; numerical proportion of male and female births in, 278; sexual affection between individ- uals of, 215; howling at certain notes, 649; rolling in carrion, 606. Dolichocephalic structure, possible cause of, 63. Dolphins, nakedness of, 63. Domestic animals, races of, 201 ; change of breeds of, 680. Domestication, influence of, in removing the sterility of hybrids, 196. D'Orbigny, A., on the influence of dampness and dryness on the color of the" skin, 220; on the Yuracaras, 661. Dotterel, 544. Doubleday, E., on sexual differences in the wings of butterflies, 314; H., on" the porportion of the sexes in the smaller moths, 284; males of Lasiocampa quercus and on the attraction of the Saturnia carpini by the female, 284 ; on the proportion of the sexes in the Lepidoptera, 284; on the ticking of Andbium tesselatum, 347; on the structure of Ageronia feronia, 349; on white butterflies alighting upon paper, 359. Douglas, J. W-, on the sexual differences of the Hemiptera, 318; colors of British Homoptera, 318. Down, of birds, 442. Draco, gular appendages of, 402. Dragonet, Gernnieous, 381. Dragon-flies, caudal appendages of male, 313 ; relative size of the sexes of, 316; difference in the sexes of, 328; want of pugnacity by the male, 330. Drake, breeding plumage of the, 446. Dreams, 84; possible source of the belief in spiritual agencies, 107. Drill, sexual difference of color in the, 614. Dromceus irroratus, 545. Dromolcaa, Saharan species of, 519. Drongo shrike, 524. Drongos, racket-shaped feathers in the tails of, 436, 445. Dryness of climate, supposed influence of, on the color of the skin, 220. Dryopithecus, 177. Duck, harlequin, age of mature plumage in the, 552; breeding in immature plumage, 552: long-tailed, preference of male, for certain females, 478; pintail, pairing with a widgeon, 471; voice of the, 42o; pairing with a shield-drake, 471 ; immature plumage of the, 532; wild, sexual differences in the, 248; speculum and male characters of, 267; pairing with a pintail drake, 471. Ducks, wild, becoming polygamous under partial domestication 249; dogs and cats recognized by, 468. Dufosse, Dr., sounds produced by fish, 393. Dugong, nakedness of, 63; tusks of, 572. Dujardin, on the relative size of the cerebral ganglia in insects, 61. INDEX. 739 Duncan, Dr., on the fertility of early marriages, 156, comparative health of married and single, 159. Dupont, M., on the occurrence of the supra-condyloid foramen in the humerus of man, 24. Durand, J. P., on causes of variation, 34. Dureau de la Malle, on the songs of birds, 97; on the acquisition of an air by blackbirds, 421. Dutch, retention of their color by the, in South Africa, 219. Duty, sense of 110. Duvaucel, female Hylobates washing her young, 79. Dyaks, pride of, in mere homicide, 182. Dynastes, large size of males of, 316. Dynastini, stridulation of, 344. Dytiscus, dimorphism of females of, 318; grooved elytra of tto female, 313. Eagle, young Cercopithecus rescued shell, by the troop, 115; oer- copithecus, white-headed, breeding in immature plumage, 552. Eagles, golden, new mates found by, 463. Ear, motion of the, 15; external form of the, useless in man, 15; rudimentary point of the, in man, 16. Ears, more variable in men than women, 253; piercing and orna- mentation of the, 656. Earwigs, parental feeling in, 120. Echidna, 178. Echini, bright colors of some, 295. Echinodermata, absence of secondary sexual characters in, 294. Echis carinata, 400. Ecker, figure of the human embryo, 11; on the development of the gyri and sulci of the brain, 232; on the sexual differences in the pelvis in man, 635; on the presence of a sagittal crest in Australians, Edentata, former wide range of, in America, 193; absence of secon- dary sexual characters in, 246. Edolius, racket- shaped feathers in, 436. Edwards, Mr., on the proportion of the sexes in North American species of Papilio, 283. Eels, hernmphroditism of, 184. Egerton, Sir P., on the use of the antlers of deer, 581, 582; on the pairing of red deer, 595; on the bellowing of stags, 601. Eggs, hatched by male fishes, 391. Egret, Indian, sexes and young of, 553. Egrets, breeding plumage of, 442; white, 560. Ehrenberg, on the mane of the male Hamadryas baboon, 594. Ekstrom, M., on Hare Ida glacialis, 478. Elachista rufocinerea, habits of male, 284. Eland, development of the horns of the, 265. Elands, sexual differences of color in, 611. Elaphomyia, sexual differences in, 317. Elaphrus uliginosus, stridulation of, 343. Maps, 400. Elateridae, proportion of the sexes in, 286. Elaters, luminous, 315. Elephant, 178; rate of increase of the, 53; nakedness of the, 63; 740 INDEX. using a fan, 91; Indian, forbearance to his keeper, 117; polygamous habits of the, 246; pugnacity of the male, 571; tusks of, 572, 573, 578, 587; Indian, mode of fighting, of the, 585; male, odor emitted by the, 604; attacking white or grey horses, 617. Elevation of abode, modifying influence of, 39. Elimination of inferior individuals, 155. Elk, 579; winter change of the, 619; Irish, horns of the, 587. Ellice Islands, beards of the natives, 639, 663. Elliot, D. G., on Pelecanus erytJirorhynchus, 442; R.,on the nu. merical proportion of the sexes in young rats, 279; on the proportion of the sexes in sheep, 278; Sir W. on the polygamous habits of the Indian wild boar, 246. Ellis, on the prevalence of infanticide in Polynesia, 676. Elphinstone, Mr., on local difference of stature among the Hindoes, 35; on the difficulty of distinguishing the native races of India, 190. Elytra, of the females of Dytiscus, Acilias.Hydroporus, 313. Emberiza, characters of young, 529; Emberiza miliaria, 529; Emberiza scJice-niclu^, 468; head- feathers of the male, 455. Embryo of man, 10, 11; of the dog, 11. Embryos of mammals, resemblance of the, 28. Emigration, 155. Emotions experienced by the lower animals in common with man, 77; manifested by animals, 80. Emperor butterfly, 348. Emperor moth, 358. Emu, sexes and incubation of, 545. Emulation of singing birds, 419. Endurance, estimation of, 134. Energy, a characteristic of men, 645. England, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 274. Engleheart, Mr. , on the finding of new mates by starlings, 464. English, loiccess of, as colonists, 160. Engravers, short-sighted, 37. Entomostraca, 304. Entozoa, difference of color between the males and females of some, 294. Environment, direct action of the, in causing differences between the sexes, 254. Envy, persistence of, 127. Eocene period, possible divergence of men during the, 177. Eolidae, colors of, produced by the biliary glands, 296. Epeira nigra, small size of the male of, 308. Ephemerae, 311. Ephemeridse, 328. Ephippiger vitium, stridulating organs of, 322, 326. Epicalia, sexual differences of coloring in the species of, 350. Equus hemionus, winter change of, 619. Erateina, coloration of, 357. Ercolani, Prof., hermaphroditism in eels, 184. Erect attitude of man, 57, 58. Eristalis, courting of 318. Eschricht, on the development of hair in man, 20; on a lanuginous mustache in a female fetus, 21; on the want of definition between INDEX. 741 the scalp and the forehead in some children, 171; on the arrange- ment of the hair in the human fetus, 172; on the hairyness of the face in the human fetus of both sexes, 688, 689. Esmerdlda, difference of color in the sexes of, 334. Esox Imius, 281 ; esox reticulatus, 386. Esquimaux, 72, 150; their belief in the inheritance of dexterity in seal -catching, 37; mode of life of, 224. Estrelda amandava, pugnacity of the male, 415. Eubagis, sexual differences of coloring in the species of, 351. Euchirus longimanus, sound produced by, 344. Eudromias morinellus, 544. Eulampis jugularis, colors of the female, 516. Euler, on the rate of increase in the U. S., 50. Eumomota super ciHaris, racket-shaped feathers in the tail of, 486. Eupetomena macroura, colors of the female, 516. Euphema splendida, 521. Euplocamus erythrophthalmus, possession of spurs by the female, 413. Europe, ancient inhabitants of, 206. Europeans, difference of, from Hindoos, 218; hairyness of, proba- bly due to reversion, 687. Eurostopodus, sexes of, 546. Eurygnathus, different proportions of the head in the sexes of, 314. Eustephanus, sexual differences of species of, 408; young of, 555. Exaggeration of natural characters by man, 664. Exogamy, 673, 675. Experience, acquisition of, by animals, 90. Expression, resemblances in, between man and the apes, 171. Extinction of races, causes of, 206. Eye, destruction of the, 36; change of position in, 62; obliquity of, regarded as a beauty by the Chinese and Japanese, 659. Eyebrows, elevation of, 14; development of long hairs in, 20; in monkeys, 171; eradicated in parts of South America and Africa, 656; eradication of, by the Indians of Paraguay, 662. Eyelashes, eradication of, by the Indians of Paraguay, 662. Eyelids, colored black, in part of Africa, 655. Eyes, pillared, of the male of Chloeon, 311; difference in the color of, in the sexes of birds, 483. Eyton, T. C., observations on the development of the horns in the fallow deer, 265. Eyzies, Les, human remains from, 207. Fabre, M., on the habits of Cerceris, 330. Facial bones, causes of modification of the, 62. Faculties, diversity of, in the same race of men, 80; inheritance of, 31; diversity of, in animals of the same species, 31; mental varia- tion of, in the same species, 74; of birds, 466. Fakirs, Indian, tortures undergone by, 134. Falco leucoceplialus, 552; falco peregnnus, 463, 524; falco tinnun- tulus, 463. Falcon, peregrine, new mate found by, 463. Falconer, H., on the mode of fighting of the Indian elephant, 585; W canines in a female deer, 586; on Hyomoschus aquaticus, 624. 742 INDEX. Falkland Islands, horses of, 206. Fallow-deer, different colored herds of, 617. Famines, frequency of, among savages, 51. Farr, Dr., on the effects of profligacy, 155; on the influence of marriage on mortality, 157, 158. Farrar, F. W., on the origin of language, 98; on the crossing or blending of languages, 102; on the absence of the idea of God in certain races of men, 105; on early marriages of the poor, 156; on the middle ages, 160. Farre, Dr. , on the structure of the uterus, 43. Fashions, long prevalence of, among savages, 658, 666. Faye, Prof., on the numerical proportion of male and female births in Norway and Russia, 275; on the greater mortality of male children at and before birth, 275. Feathers, modified, producing sounds, 427 et seq., 512; elongated, in male birds, 435, 457; racket-shaped, 436; barbless and with fila- mentous barbs in certain birds, 437; shedding of margins of, 446. Feeding, high, probable influence of, in the pairing of birds of different species, 472. Feet, thickening of the skin on the soles of the, 37; modification of, in man, 58. Felis ccmadensis, throat-ruff of, 594; felis pardalis and F. mitis, sexual difference in the coloring of, 610. Female, behavior of the, during courtship, 178; birds, differences of, 536. Females, presence of rudimentary male organs in, 184; preference of, for certain males, 242; pursuit of, by males, 250; occurrence of secondary sexual characters in, 255; development of male character by, 257. Females and males, comparative numbers of, 241, 244; compar- ative mortality of, while young, 244. Femur and tibia, proportions of, in the Aymara Indians, 39, Fenton, Mr., decrease of Maories, 210 ; infanticide among the Maories, 289. Ferguson, Mr., on the courtship of fowls, 474. Fertilization, phenomena of, in plants, 251; in the lower animals, 251. Fertility lessened under changed conditions, 214. Fevers, immunity of negroes and rnulattoes from, 220. Piber zibethicus, protective coloring of it, 619. Fick, H., effect of conscription for military service, 152. Fidelity, in the elephant, 117; of savages to one another, 133; importance of, 141. Field slaves, difference of, from house slaves, 224. Fiji Archipelago, population of the, 198; Fiji Islands, beards of the natives, 639, 663; marriage customs of the, 683. Fijians, burying their old and sick parents alive, 116; estimation of the beard among the, 663; admiration of, for a broad occiput, 665. Filial affection, partly the result of natural selection, 119. Filum terminate, 25. Finch, racket-shaped feathers in the tail of a, 436. Finches, spring change of color in, 447; British, females of the, 596. Fingers, partially coherent, in species of Hylobatet, 57. INDEX. 743 Finlayson, on the Cochin Chinese, 659 Fire, use of, 54, 164, 204. Fischer, on the pugnacity of the male of, Lethrus cephalotes, 340. Fischer, F. Von, on display of brightly colored parts by monkeys in courtship, 709. Fish, eagerness of male, 250; proportion of the sexes in, 281; sounds produced by, 393. Fishes, kidneys of, represented by Corpora Wolffiana in the human embryo, 10; male hatching ova in their mouths, 185; receptacles for ^ova possessed by, 235; relative size of the sexes in, 380; fresh water, *of the tropics, 389; protective resemblance in, 390; change of color in, 390; nest-building, 391; spawning of, 392; sounds produced by, 393, 640; continued growth of, 552. Flamingo, age of mature plumage, 551. Flexor pollicis longus, similar variation of, in man, 48. Flies, humming of, 318. Flint tools, 164. Flints, difficulty of chipping into form, 56. Florida, Quiscalvs major in, 281. Florisuga mettivora, 504. Flounder, coloration of the, 390. Flower, W. H ., on the abductor of the fifth metatarsal in apes, 47; on the position of the seals, 170; on the Pithecia monachus, 229; on the throat-pouch of the male bustard, 423. Fly-catchers, colors and nidification of, 518. Fetus, human, woolly covering of the, 21; arrangement of the hair on, 172. Food, influence of, upon stature, 35. Foot, prehensile power of the, retained in some savages, 58; pre- hensile, in the early progenitors of man, 182. Foramen, supra-condyloid, exceptional occurrence of in the humerus of man, 24, 49; in the early progenitors of man, 179. Forbes, D., on the Aymara Indians, 39; on local variation of color in the Quichuas, 223; on the hairlessness of the Aymaras and Quichuas, 639; on the long hair of the Aymaras and Quichuas, 637, 662. Forel, F., on white young swans, 550. Forester, Hon. O. W., on an orphan hawk, 465. r Formica rufa, size of the cerebral ganglia in, 61. Fossils, absence of, connecting man with the apes, 178. Fowl, occurrence of spurs in the female, 257; game, early pugnac- ity of, 270; Polish, early development of cranial peculiarities of, 270; variations in plumage of, 438; examples of correlated development in the, 484; domestic, breeds and sub -breeds of, 523. Fowls, spangled Hamburg, 259, 270; inheritance of changes of plu- mage by, 269, sexual peculiarities in, transmitted only to the same sex, 260, loss of secondary sexual characters by male, 261 ; Polish, origin of the crest in, 261; period of inheritance* of characters by, 269; cuckoo, 270; development of the comb in, 270; numerical proportion of the sexes in 280 ; courtship of, 473 ; mongrel, between a black Spanish cock and different hens, 485, penciled Hamburg, difference of the sexes in, 509, Spanish, sexual differences of the comb in, 509; spurred, in both sexes, 511 744 INDEX. Fox, W. D., on some half -tamed wild ducks becoming polygamous and on polygamy in the guinea-fowl and canary-bird, 249 ; on the proportion of the sexes in cattle, 280 ; on the pugnacity of the pea- cock, 413; on a nuptial assembly of magpies, 461 ; on the finding of new mates by crows, 463; on partridges living in triplets, 465; on the pairing of a goose with a Chinese gander, 471. Foxes, wariness of young, in hunting districts, 90; black, 616. Fraser, C., on the * different colors of the sexes in a species of Squdla, 306, Fraser, G., colors of Thecla, 353. Frere, Hookhain, quoting Theognis on selection in mankind, 33. Fringitta canabina, 447; fringitta ciris, age of mature plumage in, 551; fnngitta cyanea, age of mature plumage in, 551 ; fringitta leucophrys, young of, 553; fringitta spinns, 472; fringitta tristis, change of color in, in spring, 446; young of, 553. Fringillidae, resemblance of the females of distinct species of, 535. Frog, bright colored and distasteful to birds, 396. Frogs, 395; male, temporary receptacles for ova possessed by, 235; ready to breed before the females, 240; fighiug of, 396; vocal organs of, 397. Frontal bone, persistance of the suture in, 44. Fruits, poisonous, avoided by animals, 75. Fuegians, 150, 163; difference of stature among the, 35; power of sight in the, 38; skill of, in stone-throwing, 55; resistance of the, to their severe climate, 71, 207; mental capacity of the, 73; quasi- religious sentiments of the, 107; resemblance of, in mental charac ters, to Europeans, 203; mode of life of the, 224; aversion of, to hair on the face, 662; said to admire European women, 664. Fulgoridae, songs of the, 319. Fur, whiteness of, in arctic animals in winter, 260. Fur-bearing animals, acquired sagacity of, 90. Qatticrex, sexual difference in the color of the irides in, 483; galli- crex cnstatus, pugnacity of male, 409; red caruncle occurring in the male during the breeding-season, 442. Gallinacese, frequency of polygamous habits and of sexual differ- ences in the, 248, love- gestures of, 432; decomposed feathers in, 437; stripes of young, 529; comparative sexual differences between the species of, 536, plumage of, 537. Gallinaceous birds, weapons of the male, 412; racket-shaped feath- ers on the heads of, 436. Oallinula cMorpus, pugnacity of the male, 409. Galloperdix, spurs of, 413; development of spurs in the female, 512. Qallophasis, young of, 533. Galls. 68. Oattus bankiva, neck -hackles of, 445; gattus stanleyi, pugnacity of the male, 412. Galton, Mr., on hereditary genius, 31; gregariousness and inde- pendence in animals, 118; on the struggle between the social and personal impulses, 141; on the effects of natural selection on civilized nations, 151; on the sterility of sole daughters, 153; on the degree of fertility of people of genius, 154; on the early marriages of the poor, 156; on the ancient Greeks, 150; on the Middle Ages, 160; on the progress of the U. S., 161; on S. African notions of beauty, 661. INDEX. 745 Gammarus, use of the chelae of, 303; gammarus marinus, 305. Gannets, white only when mature, 560. Ganoid fishes, 180, 187. Gaour, horns of the, 576. Gap between man and the apes, 177. Gaper, sexes and young of, 553. Gardner, on an example of rationality in a Gelasimus, 305. Garrulus glandarius, 463. Gartner, on sterility of hybrid plants, 196. Gasteropoda, 297; pulmoniferous, courtship of, 297. Oasterosteus, 249; nidification of, 391; gasterosteus leiurus, 376, 886, 391 ; gasterosteus trachurus, 376. GastropJiora, wings of, brightly colored beneath, 357. Gauchos, want of humanity among the, 139. Gaudry, M., on a fossil monkey, 175. Gavia, seasonal change of plumage in, 561. Geese, clanging noise made by, 418; pairing of different species of, 471; Canada, selection of mates by, 471, 473. Gegenbaur, C., on the number of digits in the Ichthyopterygia, 42; on the hermaphroditisui of the remote progenitors of the verte- brata, 183; two types of nipple in mammals, 184. Gela&imus, proportions of the sexes in a species of, 288; use of the enlarged chelae of the male, 303; pugnacity of males of, 305; rational actions of a, 305; difference of color in the sexes of a species of, 307. Gemmules, dormant in one sex, 261. Genius, 31; hereditary, 643, 644; fertility of men and women of, 154. Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire, Isid., on the recognition of women by male quadrumaiia, 9 ; on monstrosities, 33 ; coincidences of arrested development with polydactylism, 42; on animal-like anomalies in the human structure, 45; on the correlation of monstrosities, 49; on the distribution of hair in man and monkeys, 64; on the caudal vertebrae of monkeys, 65; on correlated variability, 68; on the classification of man, 167; on the long hair on the heads of species of Semnopithecus, 171; on the hair in monkeys, 172; on the development of horns in female deer, 574; and F. Cuvier, on the mandrill, 614; on Hylobates, 636, 637 Geographical distribution, as evidence of specific distinctions in man, 192. Geometrae, brightly colored beneath, 357. Geophagus, frontal protuberance of male, 385, 392; eggs hatched by the male, in the mouth or branchial cavity, 392. Georgia, change of color in Germans settled in, 223. Geotrvpes, stridulation of, 343, 345. Gerbe, M., on the nest-building of Crenilabus massa and C. melon* 891. Gerland, Dr., on the prevalence of infanticide, 132, 659, 676; on the extinction of races, 207. Gervais, P., on the hairiness of the gorilla, 64; on the mandrill, 614. Gesture-language, 203. Ghost-moth, sexual difference of color in the, 358. 746 INDEX. Giard, M., disputes descent of vertebrates from Ascidians, 182; color of sponges and Ascidians, 295; musky odor of Sphinx, 349. Gibbon, voice of, 602, 647. Gibbon, Hoolock, nose of, 171. Gibbs, Sir D., on differences of the voice in different races of men, 646. Gill, Dr., male seals larger than females, 247; sexual differences in seals, 588. Giraffe, its mode of using the horns, 580; mute, except in the rut- ting season, 600. Giraud-Teulon, on the cause of short sight, 38. Glanders, communicable to man from the lower animals, 7. Glands, odoriferous, in mammals, 604, 605. Glareola, double moult in, 442. Olomeris limbata, difference of color in the sexes of, 310. Glow-worm, female apterous, 235; luminosity of the, 314. Gnants, dances of, 318; auditory powers of, 648. Gnu, skeletons of, found locked together, 571 ; sexual differences in the color of the, 612. Goat, male, wild, falling on his horns, 579; male, odor, emittted by, 604; male, wild crest of the, 608; Berbura, mane, dewlap, etc., of the male, 608; Kemas, sexual difference in the color of the, 612. Goats, sexual differences in the horns of, 260; horns of, 266; mode of fighting of, 579; domestic, sexual differences of, late developed, 269; beards of, 606. Goatsucker, Virginian, pairing of the, 416. Gobies, nidification of, 391. God, want of the idea of, in some races of men, 105. Godron M., on variability, 33; on difference of stature, 35; on the want of connection between climate and the color of the skin, 219; on the color of the skin, 225; on the color of infants. 636. Goldfinch, 421, 446; proportion of the sexes in the, 281; sexual differences of the beak in the, 409; courtship of the, 455; North American, young of, 553. Goldfish, 388, 389. Gomphus, proportions of the sexes in, 287; difference in the sexes of, 328. Oonepteryx Rhamni, 354, sexual difference of color in, 365. Goodsir, Prof., on the affinity of the lancelet to the ascidians, 181. Goosander, young of, 532. Goose, Antarctic, colors of the, 560; Canada, pairing with a Ber- nicle gander, 471; Chinese, knob on the beak of the, 484; Egyptian, 414; Sebastopol, plumage of, 438; snow, whiteness of the, 561; spur- winged, 414. Gorilla, 640; semi-erect attitude of the, 58; mastoid processes of the, 59; protecting himself from the rain with his hands, 172; manner of sitting, 172; supposed to be a kind of mandrill, 202; polygamy of the, 245, 647, 675; voice of the, 602; cranium of, 636; fighting of male, 641. Gosse, P. H., on the pugnacity of the male humming-bird, 409; Gosse, M., on the inheritance of artificial modifications of the skull, 689. Gould, B. A., on variation in the length of the legs in man, 29; INDEX. 747 measurements of American soldiers, 34, 36; on the proportions of the body and capacity of the lungs in different races of men, 190; on the inferior vitality of mulattoes, 195; Q-ould, J., on migration of swifts, 122; on the arrival of male snipes before the females, 240; on the numerical proportion of the sexes in birds, 280; on Neomorpha Grypus, 408; on the species of Eustephanus, 408; on the Australian musk-duck, 468; on the relative size of the sexes in Briziura lobata and Cindoramphus cruralis, 411; on Lobivanellus Idbatus, 414; on the habits of Menura Alberti, 421; on the rarity of song in brilliant birds, 421; on Selasphorus platycercus, 429; on the bower-birds, 432, 461; on the ornamental plumage of the humming-birds, 440; on the moulting of the ptarmigan, 444; on the display of plumage by the male humming-birds, 447; on the shyness of adorned male birds, 456; on the decoration of the bowers of bower- birds, 469; on the decora- tion of their nests by humming-birds, 469; on variation in the genus Cynanthus, 481; on the color of the thighs in a male paroquet, 481; on Vrosticte Benjamini, 502 et seq.; on the nidification of the Orioles, 516; on obscurely colored birds building concealed nests, 516; on trogons and kingfishers, 520; on Australian parrots, 521; on Austral- ian pigeons, 522; on the moulting of the ptarmigan, 526; on the im- mature plumage of birds, 530 et seq.; on the Australian species of Turnix, 542; on the young of Althurus polytmus, 555; on the colors of the bills of toucans, 560; on the relative size of the sexes in the marsupials of Australia, 588; on the colors of the marsupials, 609. Goureaux, on the stridulation of Mutilla europcea, 332. Gout, sexually transmitted, 268. Graba, on the Pied Ravens of the Feroe Islands, 482; variety of the Guillemot, 482. Gradation of secondary sexual characters in birds, 488. Grallatores, absence of secondary sexual characters in, 248; double moult in some, 443. Grallina, nidification of, 517. Grasshoppers, stridulation of the, 324. Gratiolet, Prof., on the anthropomorphous apes, 175; on the evolu- tion of the anthropomorphous apes, 202; on the difference in the de- velopment of the brains of apes and man, 231. Gray, Asa, on the gradation of species among the Composites, 199; Gray, J. E., on the caudal vertebrae of monkeys, 65; on the presence of rudiments of horns in the female of Cervulus moschatus, 574; on the horns of goats and sheep, 575; on crests of male antelopes, 606; on the beard of the ibex, 607; on the Berbura goat, 608; on sexual differences in the coloration of rodents, 609; ornaments of male sloth, 610; on the colors of the Elands, 611; on the sing-sing antelope, 612; on the colors of goats, 612; on Lemur Macaco, 618; on the hog-deer, 623. " Greatest happiness principle," 135, 136. Greeks, ancient, 159. Green, A. H,, on beavers fighting, 570; on the voice of the beaver, 602. Greenfinch, selected by a female canary, 472. Greg, W. R., on the effects of natural selection on civilized nations, 151; on the early marriages of the poor, 156; on the ancisa* Greeks, 159. - 748 INDEX. Grenadiers, Prussian, 32. Greyhounds, numerical proportion of the sexes in, 244; numerical proportion of male and female births in, 278, 291. Grouse, red, monogamous, 248; pugnacity of young male, 414; pro- ducing a sound by beating their wings together, 416; duration of courtship of, 460; colors and nidification of, 518. Gruber, Dr., on the occurrence of the supra-condyloid foramen in the humerus of man, 23; on division of malar bone,' 44; stridulation of locust, 322; ephippiger, 326. Grus Americanus, age of mature plumage in, 551; breeding in im- mature plumage, 552; grits virgo, trachea of, 425. Oryllus campestris, 321; pugnacity of male, 327; gryttus domes- ticus, 322 Grypus, sexual differences in the beak in, 408. Guanacoes, battles of, 570; canine teeth of, 580. Guanas, strife for women among the, 641; polyandry among the 677. Guanche skeletons, occurrence of the supra-condyloid foramen in the humerus of, 24. Guaranys, proportion of men and women among, 276; color of new-born children of the, 636; beards of the, 639. Guenee, A., on the sexes of Ilyperythra, 283. Guilding, L., on the stridulation of the locustidae, 320. Guillemot, variety of the, 482. Guinea, sheep of, with males only horned, 266. Guinea-fowl, monogamous, 248; occasional polygamy of the, 249; markings of the, 488. Guinea-pigs, inheritance of the effects of operations by, 67. Gulls, seasonal change of plumage in, 560; white, 560. Giinther, Dr., on paddle of Ceratodus, 42; on herrnaphroditisrn in Serranus, 184; on male fishes hatching ova in their mouths, 185, 391; on mistaking infertile female fishes for males, 281; on the pre- hensile organs of male Plagiostomous fishes, 37; spines and brushes on fishes, 37; on the pugnacity of the male salmon and trout, 377; on the relative size of the sexes in fishes, 380; on sexual differences in fishes, 381 ; et seq. ; on the genus (Jallionymus, 381 ; on a protec- tive resemblance of pipe-fish, 390; on the genus of Solenostomn, 392; on the coloration of frogs and toads, 396; combat of Test u do elegans, 398; on the sexual differences in the Ophidia, 399; on differences of the sexes of lizards, 402 et seq. Gynanisa Isis, ocellated spots of, 486. Gypsies, uniformity of, in various parts of the world, 220. Habits, bad, facilitated by familiarity, 139; variability of the force of, 142. Hackel, E., on the origin of man, 3; on rudimentary characters, 12; on death caused by inflammation of the vermiform appendage, 23; on the canine teeth in man, 45; on the steps by which man became a biped, 58; on man as a member of the Catarrhine group, 176; on the position of the Lemuridae, 178; on the genealogy of the Mammalia, 179; on the lancelet, 181; on the transparency of pelagic animals, 295; on the musical powers of women. 653. Hagen, H., and Walsh, B. D., on American Nueroptera. 286. Hair, development of, in man, 20; character of, supposed to b* INDEX. 749 determined by light and heat, 3G; distribution of, in man, 63, 685; possibly removed for ornamental purposes, 65; arrangement and direc- tion of, 171; of the early progenitors of man, 182; different texture of, in distinct races, 190; and skin correlation of color of, 225; devel- opment of, in mammals, 606 ; management of, among different peoples, 655; great length of, in some North American tribes, 662; elongation of the, on the human head, 689; possible inherited effect of plucking out, 689. Hairiness, difference of, in the sexes in man, 637; variation of, in races of men, 637. Hairs and excretory pores, numerical relation of, in sheep, 225. Hairy family, Siamese, 687. Halbertsma, Prof., hermaphroditism in Serranus, 184. Hamadryas baboon, turning over stones, 114; mane of the male, 594. Hamilton, C., on the cruelty of the Kaffirs to animals, 133; on the engrossment of the women by the Kaffir chiefs, 680. Hammering, difficulty of, 55. Hancock, A., on the colors of nudibranch Mollusca, 296, 298. Hands, larger at birth, in the children of laborers, 37; structure of, in the quadrumaua, 56; arms, freedom of, indirectly correlated with dimunition of canines, 60. Handwriting, inherited, 100. Handyside, Dr., supernumery mammae in men, 42. Harcourt, E. Vernon, on Fringttla cannabina, 447. Hare, protective coloring of the, 619. Harelda glacialis, 478. Hares, battles of male ? 570. Harlan, Dr., on the difference between field and house-slaves, 224. Harris, J. M., on the relation of complexion to climate, 222; Harris, T. W., on the Katy-did locust, 321; on the stridulation of the grass- hoppers, 324; on CEcanthus nivalis, 328; on the coloring of Lepi- doptera, 356; on the coloring of Saturnia lo, 358. . Harting, spur of the Ornithorhynchus, 573. Hartman, Dr. , on the singing of Cicada septendecim, 319. Hatred, persistence of, 127. Haughton, S., on a variation of the flexor pollicis long us, in man, 48. Hawks, feeding orphan nestling, 465. Hayes, Dr., on the diverging of sledge-dogs on thin ice, 85. Haymond, R., on the drumming of the male Tetrao umbellus, 426; on the drumming of birds, 427. Head, altered position of, to suit the erect attitude of man, 62; hairiness of, in man, 64; processes of, in male beetles, 334; artificial alterations of the form of the, 664. Hearne, on strife for women among the North American Indians, 640; on the North American Indians' notion of beauty, 659; repeated elopements of a North American woman, 682. Heart, in the human embryo, 10. Heat, supposed effects of, 36. Eectocotyle, 298. Hedge- war bier, 539; young of the, 548. Heel, small projection of, in the Aymara Indians, 39. Hegt, M., on the development of the spurs in peacocks, 267. H^liconidse, 350; mimicry of, by other butterflys, 366. 750 INDEX. Heliopathes, stridulation peculiar to the male, 345. Heliothrix auriculata, young of, 532, 533. Helix pomatia, example of individual attachment in, 297. Hellins, J., proportions of sexes of, Lepidoptera reared by, 285. Hemholtz, on pleasure derived from harmonies, 104; on the human eye, 501; on the vibration of the auditory hairs of Crustacea, 649; the physiology of harmony, 649. Hemiptera, 318. Hemitragus, beardless in both sexes, 607. Hemsbach, M. von, on medial mamma in man, 42. Hen, clucking of, 418. Hepburn, Mr., on the autumn song of the water-ouzel, 420. Hepialus Jiumuli, sexual difference of color in the, 358. Herbs, poisonous, avoided by animals, 75. Hermaphroditisin, of embryos, 183; in fishes, 184. Herodias bubulcus, vernal moult of, 445. Heron, Sir R., on the habits of pea-fowl, 475, 477, 503. Herons, love-gestures of, 331; decomposed feathers in, 437; breed- ing plumage of, 443, 444; young of the, 548, 553; sometimes dimor- phic, 552; continued growth of crest and plumes in the males of some, 552; change of color in some, 562. Hesperomys cognatus, 648. Hetcerina, proportion of the sexes in, 287; difference in the sexes of, 328. Heterocerus, stridulation of, 342. Hewitt, Mr., on a game-cock killing a kite, 412; on the recognition of dogs and cats by ducks, 468; on the pairing of a wild duck with a pintail drake, 471 ; on the courtship of fowls, 473; on the coupling of pheasants with common hens, 477. Hilgendorf , sounds produced by crustaceans, 309. Hindoo, his horror of breaking his caste, 138, 140. Hindoos, local differences of stature among, 35; difference of, from Europeans, 218; color of the beard in, 637. Hipparchia Janira,488; instability of the ocellated spots of, 486. Hippocampus, development of, 185; marsupial receptacles of the male, 392; Jiippocampus minor, 227, 230. Hippopotamus, nakedness of, 63. Hips, proportions of, in soldiers and sailors, 36. Hodgson, S., on the sense of duty, 111. Hoffberg, on the horns of the reindeer, 574; on sexual preferences shown by reindeer, 598. Hoffman, Prof., protective colors, 318; fighting of frogs, 396. Hog, wart, 592; river, 593. Hog-deer, 623. Holland, Sir H. , on the effects of new diseases, 208. Homologous structures, correlated variation of, 49. Homoptera, 319; stridulation of the, and Orthoptera, discussed, 827. Honduras, Quiscalus major in, 281. Honey-buzzard of India, variation in the crest of, 481. Honey-sucker, females and young of, 533. Honey-suckers, moulting of the, 444; Australian, nidification of, 516. Honor, law of, 137. Hooker, Dr., forbearance of elephant to his keeper, 117; on the color of the beard in man, 637 , INDEX. 751 Hookham, Mr., on mental concepts in animals, 94. Hoolock Gibbon, nose of, 171. Hoopoe, 421; sounds produced by male, 427. Hoplopterus armatus, wing-spurs of, 414. Hornbill, African, inflation of the neck-wattle of the mtle during courtship, 435. Hornbills, sexual difference in the color of the eyes in, 483; nidfica- tion and incubation of, 516. Home, C., on the rejection of a brightly colored locust by lizards and birds, 428. Horns, sexual differences of, in sheep and goats, 260; loss of, in female merino sheep, 261 ; development of, in deer, 264 ; devel- opment in antelopes, 265; from the head and thorax, in male beetles, 336; of deer, 573, 577, 587; originally a masculine character in sheep, 576, and canine teeth, inversed development of, 586. Horse, fossil, extinction ot the, in South America, 218; polygamous, 246; canine teeth of male, 572; winter change of color, 619. Horses, rapid increase of, in South America, 53; diminution of canine teeth in, 60 ; dreaming, 84 ; of the Falkland Islands and Pampas, 206; numerical proportion of the sexes in, 244, 245; lighter in winter in Siberia, 260; sexual preferences in, 598; pairing preferently with those of the same color 617; numerical proportion of male and female births in, 278; formerly striped, 626. Hottentot women, peculiarities of, 198. Hottentots, lice of, 192; readily become musicians, 650; notions of female beauty of the, 660; compression of nose by, 665. Hough, Dr. S. , men's temperature more variable than women's, 253, proportion of sexes in man, 274. House-slaves, difference of, from field-slaves, 224. Houzeau, on the baying of the dog, 84; on reason in dogs, 84; birds killed by telegraph wires, 90; on the cries of domestic fowls and parrots, 96, 99; animals feel no pity, 116; suicide in the Aleutian islands, 133. Howorth, H. H., extinction of savages, 209. Huber, P., on ants playing together, 77; on memory in ants, 83; on the intercommunication of ants, 101 ; on the recognition of each other by ants after separation, 331. Hue, on Chinese opinions of the appearance of Europeans, 659. Huia, the, of New Zealand, 236. Human, man classed alone in a, kingdom, 167; sacrifices, 108. Humanity, unknown among some savages, 133; deficiency of, among savages, 139. Humboldt, A. von, on the rationality of mules, 88; on a parrot preserving the language of a lost tribe, 206; on the cosmetic arts of savages, 654; on the exaggeration of natural characters by man, 664; on the red painting of American Indians, 665. Hume, D., on sympathetic feelings, 123. Humming-bird, racket-shaped feathers in the tail of a, 436; dis- play of plumage by the male, 447. Humming-birds, ornament their nests, 104, 469; polygamous, 248; proportion of the sexes in, 281, 555; sexual differences in, 408, 503; pugnacity of male, 409; modified primaries of male, 429; coloration of the sexes of, 440; display by, 503; nidification of the, 516, 517; colors of female, 516; young of, 555. 752 INDEX. Humor, sense of, in dogs, 80. Humphreys, H. N., on the habits of the stickleback, 249, 376' Hunger, instinct of, 127. Huns, ancient, flattening of the nose by the, 665. Hunter, J., on the number of species of man, 199; on secondary sexual characters, 234; on the general behavior of female animals during courtship, 251; on the muscles of the larynx in song-birds, 421; on strength of males, 588; on the curled frontal hair of the bull, 606; on the rejection of an ass by a female zebra, 617. Hunter, \V. W., on the recent rapid increase of the Santali, 51; on the Santali, 218. Huss, Dr. Max, on the mammary glands, 184. Hussey, Mr., on a partridge distinguishing persons, 468. Hutchinson, Col., example of reasoning in a retriever, 88. Hutton, Capt., on the male wild goat falling on his horns, 579. Huxley, T. H., on the structural agreement of man with the apes, 2; on the agreement of the brain in man with that of lower animals, 6; on the adult age of the orang, 9; on the embryonic development of man, 10; on the origin of man, 3, 12; on variation in the skulls of the natives of Australia, 29, on the abductor of the fifth metatarsal in apes, 47; on the nature of the reasoning power, 87; on the position of man, 176; on the suborders of primates, 173; on the Lemuridae> 179; on the Dinosauria, 180; on the amphibian affinities of the Ich- thyosaurians, 180; on variability of the skull in certain races of man, 198; on the races of man, 201; supplement on the brain, 227. Hybrid birds, production of, 470. Hydrophobia communicable between man and the lower animals, 7. Hydroporus, dimorphism of females of, 313. Hydaphus portinus, 623. Hygrogonus, 392. Hyla, singing species of, 397. Hylobates, absence of the thumb in, 57; upright progression of some species of, 59; maternal affection in a, 79; direction of the hair on the arms of species of, 172; females of, less hairy below than males, 637; hylobates agilis, 57; hair on the arms of, 172; musical voice of, 602, superciliary ridge of, 636; voice of, 647. Hylobates hoolock, sexual difference of color in, 613; hylobates lar, 57; hair on the arms of, 72; female less hairy, 637; hylobates leucis- cus, 57; song of, 647; hylobates syndactylus, 57; laryngeal sac of, 602. Hylophila prasinana, 349. Hymenoptera, 330; large size of the cerebral ganglia in, 437; classification of, 168; sexual differences in the wings of, 314; aculeate, relative size of the sexes of, 316. Hymenopteron, parasitic, with a sedentary male, 251. Hyomoschus aquaticus, 624. Hypcrythra, proportion of the sexes in, 283. Hypogymna dispar, sexual difference of color in, 358. Hypopyra, coloration of, 357. Ibex, male, falling on his horns, 579; beard of the, 607. Ibis, white, change of color of naked skin in, during the breeding season, 442; scarlet, young of the, 548; ibis tantalus, age of mature plumage in, 551; breeding in immature plumage, 552. INDEX. 753 Ibisis, decomposed feathers in, 437; white, 560; and black, 562. Ichneumonidae, difference of the sexes in, 331. Ichthyopterygia, 42. Ichthyosaurians, 180. Idiots, microcephalous, their characters and habits, 40; hairiness and animal nature of their actions, 41; microcephalous imitative faculties of, 98. Iguana tuberculata, 402. Iguanas, 402. Illegitimate and legitimate children, proportion of the sexes in, 276. Imagination, existence of, in animals, 84. Imitation, 77; of man by monkeys, 82; tendency to, in monkeys, microcephalous idiots and savages, 98; influence of, 146. Immature plumage of birds, 528, 531. Implacentata, 179. Implements, employed by monkeys, 91; fashioning of, peculiar to man, 92. Impregnation, period of, influence of, upon sex, 277. Improvement, progressive, man alone suppposed to be capable of, 89. Incisor teeth, knocked out or filed by some savages, 656. Increase, rate of, 50; necessity of checks in, 53. Indecency, hatred of, a modern virtue, 135. India, difficulty of distinguishing the native races of, 190; Cyprinidae of, 389; color of the beard in races of men of, 637. Indian, North American, honored for scalping a man of another tribe, 132. Individuality, in animals, 93. Indolence of man, when free from a struggle for existence, 161. Indopicus carlotta, colors of the sexes of, 521. Infanticide, prevalence of, 52, 132, 289, 290; supposed cause of, 658; prevalence and causes of, 675 et seq. Inferiority, supposed physical, of man, 72. Inflammation of the bowels, occurrence of, in Cebus Azarce, 7. Inheritance, 31; of long and short sight, 37; of effects of use of vocal and mental organs, 100; of moral tendencies, 139, 143; laws of 257; sexual, 262; sexually limited, 506. Inquisition, influence of the, 159. / " Insanity, hereditary, 31. Insect, fossil, from the Devonian, 327. Insectivora, 610; absence of secondary sexual characters in, 247. Insects, relative size of the cerebral ganglia in, 60; male, appear- ance of, before the females, 240; pursuit of female, by the males, 250; period of development of sexual characters in, 268 ; secondary sexual characters of, 311; kept in cages, 319, 327; stridulation, 646. Insessores, vocal organs of, 421. Instep, depth of, in soldiers and sailors, 36. Instinct and intelligence, 75; migratory, vanquishing the maternal, 122, 128. Instinctive actions, the result of inheritance, 119; impulses, dif- ference of the force, 125 et seq.; and moral impulses, alliance of, 126. Instincts, 74; complex origin of, through natural selection, 76; possible origin of some, 76; acquired, of domestic animals, 118; 754 INDEX. variability of the force of, 121; difference of force between the social and other, 126, 143; utilized for new purposes, 651. Instrumental music of birds, 425, 430. Intellect, influence of, in natural selection in civilized society, 154. Intellectual faculties, their influence on natural selection in man, 144; probably perfected through natural selection, 146. Intelligence, Mr. H. Spencer on the dawn of, 75. Intemperance, no reproach among savages, 135; its destructive ness, 155. Intoxication in monkeys, 7. Iphias glaucippe, 354. Iris, sexual difference in the color of the, in birds, 435, 483. Ischio-pubic muscle, 46. Ithaginis cruentas, number of spurs in, 413. lulus, tarsal suckers of the males of, 310. Jackals learning from dogs to bark, 82. Jack-snipe, coloration of the, 557. Jacquinot, on the number of species of man, 199. Jaeger, Dr., length of bones increased from carrying weights, 36; on the difficulty of approaching herds of wild animals, 114; male silver pheasant, rejected when his plumage was spoiled, 476. Jaguars, black, 616. Janson, E. W., on the proportions of the sexes in Tomicus villosua, 286; on stridulant beetles, 342. Japan, encouragement of licentiousness in, 52. Japanese, general beardlessness of the, 639; aversion of the, to whiskers, 662. Jardine, Sir W., on the Argus pheasant, 436, 457. Jarrold, Dr., on modifications of the skull induced by unnatural position, 62. Jarves, Mr., on infanticide in the Sandwich Islands, 290. Javans, relative height of the sexes of, 638; notions of female beauty, 661. Jaw, influence of the muscles of the, upon the physiognomy of the apes, 60. Jaws, smaller proportionately to the extremities, 37; influence of food upon the size of, 37; diminution of, in man, 60; in man, re- duced by correlation, 641. Jay, young of the, 548; Canada, young of the, 549. Jays, new mates found by, 463; distinguishing persons, 468. Jeffreys, J. Gwyn, on the form of the shell in the sexes of the Gasteropoda, 297; on the influence of light upon the colors of shells, 298. Jelly-fish, bright colors of some, 295. Jenner, Dr., on the voice of the rook, 426; on the finding of new mates by magpies, 462; on retardation of the generative functions in birds, 465. Jenyns, L., on the desertion of their young by swallows, 122; on male birds singing after the proper season, 465. Jerdon, Dr., on birds dreaming, 84; on the pugnacity of the male bulbul, 409; on the pugnacity of the male Ortygornis gularis, 412; on the spurs of Ocdloperdix, 413; on the habits of Lobivanellus, 414; INDEX. 755 on the spoonbill, 425; on the drumming of the Kali j -pheasant, 426; on Indian bustards, 429; on Otis bengalensis, 432; on the ear-tufts of Sypheotides auritus, 436; on the double moults of certain birds, 444; on the moulting of the honeysuckers, 444; on the moulting of bustards, plovers and drongos, 445; on the spring change of color in some finches, 447; on display in male birds, 447; on the display of the undertail coverts by the male bulbul, 456; on the Indian honey- buzzard, 481; on sexual differences in the color of the eyes of horn- bills, 483; on the markings of the Tragopan pheasant, 487; on the nidification of the Orioles, 516; on the nidification of the hornbills, 517; on the Sultan yellow-tit, 521; on Palceornis javanicus, 525; on the immature plumage of birds, 529, et seq.; on representative species of birds, 533; on the habits of Turnix, 542; on the continued increase of beauty of the peacock, 552; on coloration in the genus Palceornis, 562. Jevons, W. S., on the migrations of man, 53. Jews, ancient use of flint tools by the, 164; uniformity of, in various parts of the world, 220; numerical proportion of male and female births among the, 275; ancient, tattooing practiced by, 655. Johnstone, Lieut., on the Indian elephant, 246. Jollofs, fine appearance of the, 670. Jones, Albert, proportion of sexes of Lepidoptera, reared by, 285. Juan Fernandez, humming-birds of, 555. Junonia, sexual differences of coloring in species of, 851. Jupiter, comparison with Assyrian effigies, 663. Kaffir skull, occurrence of the diastema in a, 45. Kaffirs, their cruelty to animals, 133; lice of the, 194; color of the, 661; engrossment of the handsomest women by the chiefs of the, 680; marriage-customs of the, 683. Kali j -pheasant, drumming of the male, 426; young of, 533. Kallima, resemblance of, to a withered leaf, 353. Kalmucks, general beardlessness of, 639; aversion of, to hairs on the face, 662. Kangaroo, great red, sexual difference in the color of, 609. Kant, Imm., on duty,110; on self-restraint, 124; on the number of species of man, 199. Katy-did, stridulation of the, 321. Keen, Dr., on the mental powers of snakes, 399. Keller, Dr., on the difficulty of fashioning stone implements, 55. Kent, W. S. , elongation of dorsal fin of Callionymus lyra, 382; courtship of Labrus mixtus, 386; colors and courtship of Cantharus lineatus, 386. Kestrels, new mates found by, 463. Kidney, one, doing double work in disease, 35. King, W. R., on the vocal organs of Tetrao cupido, 423; on the drumming of grouse, 427; on the reindeer, 574; on the attraction of male deer by the voice of the female, 601. King and Fitzroy, on the marriage customs of the Fuegians, 684. King-crows, nidification of, 516. Kingfisher, 421; racket-shaped feathers in the tail of a, 436. King-fishers, colors and nidification of the, 518, 520, 522; imma- ture plumage of the, 532, 533; young of the, 548. King Lory, 521; immature plumage of the, 532. 756 INDEX. Kingsley, C., on the sounds produced by Umbrina, 394. Kirby and Spence, on sexual differences in the length of the snout in Curculionidse, 236; on the courtship of insects, 250; on the elytra of Dytiscus, 313; on peculiarities in the legs of male insects, the 313; on the relative size of the sexes in insects, 316; on the Fulgor- idae, 319; on the habits of Termites, 830; on difference of color in the sexes of beetles, 333; on the horns of the male lamellicorn beetles, 336; on hornlike processes in male Curculionidse, 339; on the pug- nacity of the male stag-beetle, 339. Kite, killed by a game-cock, 412. Knot, retention of winter plumage by the, 444. Knox, R., on the semilunar fold, 19; on the occurrence of the supra-condyloid foramen in the humerus of man, 23; on the features of the young Memnon, 192. Koala, length of the coecum in, 22. Kdbus ellipsiprymnus, proportion of the sexes in, 280. Kolreuter, on the sterility of hybrid plants, 196. Koodoo, development of the horns of the, 265; markings of the, 621. KQppen, P. T., on the migratory locust, 320. Koraks, marriage customs of, 683. Kordofan, protuberances artificially produced by natives of, 655. Ko'rte, on the proportion of sexes in locusts, 287; Russian locusts. 320. Kovalevsky, A., on the affinity of the Ascidia to the Vertebrata, 181. Kovalevsky, W., on the pugnacity of the male capercailzie, 412; on the pairing of the capercailzie, 416. Krause, on a convoluted body at the extremity of the tail in a Macacus and a cat, 25. Kupffer, Prof., on the affinity of the Ascidia to the Vertebrata, 181. Labidocera Darwnii, prehensile organs of the male, 301. Ldbrus, splendid colors of the species of, 382; labrus mixtus, sexual c4fferences in, 382, 386; labrus pavo, 388. Lacertilia, sexual differences of, 401. Lafresnaye, M. de, on birds of paradise, 439. Lamarck, on the origin of man, 3. Lainellibranchiata, 296. - Lamellicorn beetles, horn-like processes from the head and thorax of, 334, 336; influence of sexual selection on, 341. Lamellicornia, stridulation of, 343. Lament, Mr., on the tusks of the walrus, 572; on the use of its tusks by the walrus, 585; on the bladder-nose seal, 603. Lampornls porphyrurus, colors of the female, 516. Lampyrida?, distasteful to mammals, 314. Lancelot, 181, 187. Landois, H., gnats attracted by sound, 318; on the production of sound by the Cicadae, 819; on the stridulating organ of the crickets, 821; on Decticus, 323; on the stridulating organs of the Acridiidse, 824; stridulating apparatus in Orthoptera, 326; on the stridulation of yecrophorus, 342; on the stridulant organs of Ceramlyx heros, 343; on the stridulant organ of Oeotrupcs, 343; on the stridulating organs in the Ooleoptera, 344; on the ticking of Anobium, 347. Landor, Dr., on remorse for not obeying tribal custom, 130. Language, an art, 97; articulate, origin of, 98; relation of the INDEX. 757 progress of, to the development of the brain, 99; effects of inher- itance in production of, 100; complex structure of, among barbar- ous nations, 103; natural selection in, 103; gesture, 203; primeval, 204; of a lost tribe preserved by a parrot, 206. Languages, presence of rudiments in, 102; classification of, 102; variability of, 102; crossing or blending of, 102; complexity of, no test of perfection or proof of special creation, 103; resemblance of, evi- dence of community of origin, 169; languages and species, identity of evidence of their gradual development, 102. Lanius, 525; characters of young, 529; lanius rufus, anomalous young of, 550. Lankester, E. R., on comparative longevity, 151, 155; on the de- structive effects of intemperance, 155. Lanugo, of the human fetus, 21, 685. Lapponian language, highly artificial, 103. Lark, proportion of the sexes in the, 281 ; female, singing of the, 420. Larks, attracted by a mirror, 469. Lartet, E., comparison of cranial capacities of skulls of recent and tertiary mammals, 62; on the size of the brain in mammals, 91; on Dryopithecus, 177; on pre-historic flutes, 650. Larus, seasonal change of plumage in, 561. Larva, luminous, of a Brazilian beetle, 314. Larnyx, muscles of the, in song birds, 421. Lasiocampa quercus, attraction of males by the female, 284; sexual difference of color in, 358. Latham, R. G., on the migrations of man, 53. Latooka, perforation of the lower lip by the women of, 656. Laurillard, on the abnomal division of the malar bone in man, 44. Lawrence, W., on the superiority of savages to Europeans in power of sight, 38; on the color of negro infants, 636; on the fond- ness of savages for ornaments, 654; on beardless races, 662; on the beauty of the English aristocracy, 670. Layard, E. L., on the instance of rationality in a cobra, 399; on the pugnacity of Oallus Stanleyi, 412. Laycock, Dr., on vital periodicity, 8; theroid nature of idiots, 41. Leaves, autumn, tints, useless, 296. Lecky, Mr., on the sense of duty, 111; on suicide, 132; on the practice of celibacy, 135; his view of the crimes of savages, 135; on the gradual rise of morality, 141. Leconte, J. L., on the stridulant organ in the Coprini andDynas- tini, 344. Lee, H., on the numerical proportion of the sexes in the trout, 282. Leg, calf of the, artifically modified, 655. Legitimate and illegitimate children, proportion of the sexes in, 276. Legs, variation of the length of the, in man, 29; proportions of, in soldiers and sailors, 36; front, atrophied in some male butterflies, 314; peculiarities of, in male insects, 314. Leguay, on the occurrence of the supra-condyloid foramen in the hurnerus of man, 24. "Lek "of the black cock and capercailzie, 460. Lemoine, Albert, on the origin of language, 98. Lemur macaco, sexual difference of color in, 613. Lemuridse, 173; ears of the, 17; variability of the muscles in the, 46; position and derivation of the, 178; their origin, 188. 758 INDEX. Lemurs, uterus in the, 43. Lenguas, disfigurement of the ears of the, 656. Leopards, black, 616. Lepidoptera, 348; numerical proportions of the sexes in the, 282j coloring of, 349; ocellated spots of, 486. Lepidosiren, 180, 187. Leptalides, mimicry of, 368. Leptorhynchus angustatus, pugnacity of male, 339. Leptura testacea, difference of color in the sexes of, 333. Leroy, on the wariness of young foxes in hunting districts, 90; on the desertion of their young by swallows, 122. Leslie, D., marriage customs of Kaffirs, 683. Lesse, valley of the, 24. Lesson, on the birds of paradise, 248, 457; on the sea-elephant, 603. Lessona, M., observations on Serranus, 184. Lethrus cepJicdotes, pugnacity of the males of, 337, 340. Leuciscus phoxinus, 282. Leuckart, R., on the vesicula prostatica, 26; on the influence of the age of Barents on the sex of offspring, 277. Levator clavicular, muscle, 47. Libellula depressa, color of the male, 329. LibellulidjE, relative size of the sexes of, 316; difference in the sexes of, 329. Lice of domestic animals and man, 193. Licentiousness a check upon population, 52; prevalence of, among savages, 134. Lichenstein, on Chera progne, 476. Life, inheritance at corresponding periods of, 259, 263. Light, effects on complexion, 36; influence of, upon the colors of shells, 298. Lilford, Lord, the ruff attracted by bright objects, 469. Limosa lapponica, 544. Unai-ia, 525; linaria montana, 281. Lindsay, Dr. W. L., diseases communicated from animals to man, 8; madness in animals, 89; the dog considers his master his God, 108. Linnaeus, views of, as to the position of man, 170. Linnet, numerical proportion of the sexes in the, 281; crimson forehead and breast of the, 447; courtship of the, 455. Lion, polygamous, 247; mane of the, defensive, 594; roaring of the, 601. Lions, stripes of young, 528. Lips, piercing of the, by savages, 657. Lithobius, prehensile appendages of the female, 310. Lithosia, coloration in, 356. Littorina littorea, 296. Livingstone, Dr., manner of sitting of gorilla, 172; on the influence of dampness and dryness on the color of the skin, 220; on the liability of negroes to tropical fevers after residence in a cold climate, 220; on the spur-winged goose, 414; on weaver-birds, 427; on an African night-jar, 436, 457; on the battle-scars of South African male mammals, 570; on the removal of the upper incisors by tlit Batokas, 656; on the perforation of the upper lip by the Makalolo, 657; on the Banyai, 661. INDEX. 759 Livonia, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 243, 275. Lizards, relative size of the sexes of, 401 ; gular pouches of, 402. Lloyd, L., on the polygamy of the capercailzie and bustard, 248; on the numeral proportion of the sexes in the capercailzie and black- cock, 280; on the salmon, 378; on the colors of the sea-scorpion, 382; on the pugnacity of male grouse, 415; on the capercailzie and black-cock, 416, 420; on the call of the capercailzie, 425; on assem- blages of grouse and snipes, 460; on the pairing of a shield-drake with a common duck, 471; on the battles of seals, 571; on the elk, 579. Lobivanellus, wing-spurs in, 414. Local influences, effect of, upon stature, 34. Lockwood, Mr., on the development of Hippocampus, 185. Lock wood, Rev. S., musical mouse, 648. Locust, bright-colored, rejected by lizards and birds, 328. Locust, migratory, 321; selection by female, 321. Locustidje, stridulation of the 320, 322; descent of the, 323. Locusts, proportion of sexes in, 287; stridulation of, 321. Longicorn beetles, [difference of the sexes of, in color, 333; stridula- tion of, 343. Lonsdale, Mr., on an example of personal attachment in Helta pomatia, 296. Lophobranchii marsupial receptacles of the male, 392i Lophophorus, habits of, 477. Lophorina atra, sexual difference in coloration of, 559. Lophornis ornatus, 439. Lord, J. K., on Salmo lycaodon, 377. Lory, King, 521 ; immature plumage of the, 532. Lory, king, constancy of, 466. Love-antics and dances of birds, 431. Lowne, B. T., on Musca wmitoria, 61, 318. Loxia, characters of young of, 529. Lubbock, Sir J., on the antiquity of man, 2; on the origin of man, 3; on the mental capacity of savages, 73; on the origin of imple- ments, 93; on the simplification of languages, 104; on the absence of the idea of God among certain races of men, 106; on the origin of the belief in spiritual agencies, 107; on superstitions, 108; on the sense of duty, 111; on the practice of burying the old and sick among the Fijians, 116; on the immorality of savages, 135 ; on Mr. Wallace's claim to the origination of the idea of natural selection, 55; on the former barbarism of civilized nations, 162; on improvements in the arts among savages, 164; on resemblances of the mental characters in different races of men, 203; on the arts practiced by savages, 204; on the power of counting in primeval man, 204; on the prehensile organs of the male Labidocera Darwinii, 301; on Chloeon, 311; on Smynthurus luteus, 317; finding of new mates by jays, 463; on strife for women among the North American Indians, 640; on music, 650; on the ornamental practices of savages, 654; on the estimation of the beard among the Anglo-Saxons, 663; on artificial deformation of the skull, 565; on "communal marriages," 671; on oxogamy, 673, 676; on the Veddahs, 675; on polyandry, 677 Lucanidse, variability of the mandible es in the male, 339- 760 INDEX. Lucanus, large size of males of, 316; lucanus cervus, numerical proportion of sexes of, 286 ; weapons of the male, 339; lucanus elaphus, use of mandibles of, 340; large jaws of male, 312. Lucas Prosper, on pigeons, 475; on sexual preference in horses and bulls, 598. Luminosity in insects, 314. Lunar periods, 8, 187. Lund, Dr., on skulls found in Brazilian caves, 192. Lungs, enlargement of, in the Quichua and Aymara Indians, 38; a modified swim-bladder, 183 ; different capacity of, in races of man, 191. Luschka, Prof., on the termination of the coccyx, 25. Luxury, expectation of life uninfluenced by, 154. Lyccena, sexual differences of color in species of, 351 . Lycaense, colors of, 354. Lyell, Sir C., on the antiquity of man, 2; on the origin of man, 3; on the parallelism of the development of species and languages, 102; on the extinction of languages 102; on the Inquisition, 160; on the fossil remains of vertebrata, 178; on the fertility of mulattoes, 194. Lynx, Canadian, throat-ruff of the, 594. Lyre-bird, assemblies of, 461. Macacus, ears of, 17; convoluted body in the extremity of the tail of, 26; variability of the tail in species of, 65; whiskers of species of, 607; macacus brunneus, 66; macacus cynomolgus, superciliary ridge of, 636; beard and whiskers of, becoming white with age, 637; macacus ecaudatus, 67; macacus lasiotus, facial spots of, 629; maca- cus nemenstnnus, 710; macacus radiatus, 171; macacus rhesus, sexual difference in the color of, 616, 629. Macalister, Prof., on variations of the palmaris accessorius muscle, 30; on muscular abnormalities in man, 47, 48; on the greater varia- bility of the muscles in men than in women, 253. Macaws, Mr. Buxton's observations on, 115, 425. McCann, J., on mental individuality, 95. McClelland J., on the Indian Cyprinidse, 389. Macculloch, Col., on an Indian village without any female children, 676. Macculloch, Dr., on tertian ague in a dog, 8. Macgillivray, W., on the vocal organs of birds, 101; on the Egyptian goose, 414; on the habits of woodpeckers, 427; on the habits of the snipe, 428; on the whitethroat, 432; on the moulting of the snipes, 444; on the moulting of the Anatidse, 446; on the finding of new mates by magpies, 453; on the pairing of a blackbird and thrush, 470; on pied ravens, 482 ; on the guillemots, 482; on the colors of the tits, 521; on the immature plumage of birds, 530, et seq. MficJietes, sexes and young of, 553, et seq. ; machetes pugnax, sup- posed to be polygamous, 248; numerical proportion of the sexes in, 280; pugnacity of the male, 409; double moult in, 443. Mclntosh, Dr., colors of the Nemertians, 299. McKennan, marriage customs of Koraks, 684. Mackintosh, on the moral sense, 110. MacLachlan, K., on Apatania muiiebris and Boreus hyemal^, 287; on the anal appendages of male insects, 811; on the pairing of INDEX. 761 dragon flies, 316; on dragon flies, 329; on dimorphism in Agrion, 329; on the want of pugnacity in male dragon flies, 330; color of ghost-moth in the Shetland Islands, 359. M'Lennan, Mr., on infanticide, 52, 675; on the origin of the belief in spiritual agencies, 106; on the prevalence of licentiousness among savages, 134, 671; on the primitive barbarism of civilized nations, 162; on traces of the custom of the forcible capture of wives, 163, 676; on polyandry, 677. MacnamaTa, Mr., susceptibility of Andaman Islanders and Nepalese to change, 214. McNeill, Mr., on the use of the antlers of deer, 582; on the Scotch deerhound, 589; on the long hairs on the throat of the stag, 595; on the bellowing of stags, 600. Macropus, courtship of, 387. Macrorhinus proboscideus, structure of the nose of, 603. Magpie, power of speech of, 101; vocal organs of the, 421; nuptial assemblies of, 461; new mates found by, 462; stealing bright objects, 469; young of the, 548; coloration of the, 562. Maillard, M., on the proportion of the sexes in a species of PapiKo from Bourbon, 283; Maine, Sir Henry, on the absorption of one tribe by another, 145; a desire for improvement not general, 150. Major, Dr. C. Forsyth, on fossil Italian apes, 177; skull of Bos etruscus, 576; tusks of miocene pigs, 593. Makalolo, perforation of the upper lip by the, 657. Malar bone, abnormal division of, in man, 44. Malay, Archipelago, marriage-customs of the savages of the, 683. Malays, line of separation between the Papuans and the, 192; gen- eral beardlessness of the, 689; staining of the teeth among, 655; aversion of some, to hairs on the face, 662; and Papuans, contrasted characters of, 191. Male animals, struggles of, for the possession of the females, 239, 241; eagerness of, in courtship, 250, 251; generally more modified than female, 250, 252; differ in the same way from females and young, 263; characters, developed in females, 257; transfer of, to female birds, 537; sedentary, of a hymenopterous parasite, 251, Malefactors, 155. Males, presence of rudimentary female organs in, 184; and females, comparative numbers of, 241, 244 ; comparative mortality of, while young, 244. Malherbe, on the woodpeckers, 521. Mallotus Pe/wm,376; mllosus, 375. Malthus, T., on the rate of increase of population, 50, 51, 52. Maluridse, nidification of the, 517. Malurus, young of, 553. Mammae, 235; rudimentary, in male mammals, 12, 26, 183, 184, 185; supernumerary, in women, 41; of male human subject, 42. Mammalia, Prof. Owen's classification of, 168; genealogy of the. 180. Mammals, recent and tertiary, comparison of cranial capacity of, 62; nipples of, 184; pursuit of female, by the males, 250; secondary sexual characters of, 570; weapons of, 571; relative size of the sexes of, 588; parallelism of, with birds in secondary sexual characters, 6,18; voioe o|, u,se4 especially during the breeding season, 647. 762 INDEX. Man, variability of, 29; erroneously regarded as more domesticated than other animals, 31; migrations of, 53; wide distribution of, 53; causes of the nakedness of, 63; supposed physical inferiority of, 72; a member of the Catarrhine group, 176; early progenitors of, 182; transition from ape indefinite, 205; numerical proportions of the sexes in, 243; difference between the sexes, 252; proportion of sexes among the illegitimate, 276 ; different complexion of male and female negroes, 634 ; secondary sexual characters of, 634; primeval condition of, 678. Mandans, correlation of color and texture of hair in the, 225. Mandible, left, enlarged in the male of Taphroderes distortus, 313. Mandibles, use of the, in Ammophila, 312; large, of Corydalie cornutns, 312; large, of male Lucanus elaphus, 312. Mandrill, number of caudal vertebrae in the, 65; colors of the male, 614, 617, 629. Mantegazza, Prof., on last molar teeth of man, 22; bright colors in male animale, 254; on the ornaments of savages, 654 et scq.; on the beardlessness of the New Zealanders, 663; on the exaggeration of natural characters by man, 664. Mantell, W., on the engrossment of pretty girls by the New Zea- land chiefs, 680. Mantis, pugnacity of species of, 710. Maories, mortality of, 210; infanticide and proportion of sexes, 289; distaste for hairiness among men, 663; Marcus Aurelius, on the origin of the moral sense, 111; on the influence of habitual thoughts, 139. Mareca pe nelope, 471. Marks, retained throughout groups of birds, 485. Marriage, restraints upon, among savages, 50; influence of, upon morals, 134; influence of, on mortality, 157; development of, 673. Marriages, early, 156 et seq.; commual, 670, 672. Marshall, Dr. W., protuberances on birds' heads, 266, 435; on the moulting of birds, 445; advantage to older birds of paradise, 552; Marshall, Col., interbreeding among Todas, 215; infanticide and proportion of sexes with Todas, 288 ; choice of husband among Todas, 677; Marshall, Mr., on the brain of a Bush woman, 191. Marsupials, 179; development of the nictitating membrane in, 19; uterus of, 43 ; possession of nipples by, 185 ; their origin from Monotremata, 188; abdominal sacs of, 235; relative size of the sexes of, 588; colors of, 609. Marsupium, rudimentary, in male marsupials, 183. Martin, W. C. L., on alarm manifested by an orang at the sight of a turtle, 81; on the hair in Hylobates, 172; on a female American deer, 586; on the voice of Hylobates agilis, 602; on Semnopithecut nemceus, 630; on the beards of the inhabitants of St. Kilda, 638. Martins deserting their young, 122. Martin, C., on death caused by inflammation of the vermiform appendages, 23. Mastoid processes in man and apes, 59. Maudsley, Dr., on the influence of the sense of smell in man, 20; on idiots smelling their food, 41; on Laura Bridgman, 99; on the development of the vocal organs, 101; moral s,ense failing in incipient madness, 140; change of mental faculties at puberty in man, 644. INDEX. 763 Mayers, W. P. , on the domestication of the goldfish in China, 389. Mayhew, E., on the affection between individuals of different sexes in the dog, 596. Maynard, C. J., on the sexes of Chrysemys picta, 397. Meckel, on correlated variation of the muscles of the arm and leg, 49. Medicines, effect produced by, the same in man and in monkeys, 7. Medusce, bright colors of some, 295. Megalithic structures, prevalence of, 204. Megapicus validus, sexual difference of color in, 521. Megasoma, large size of males of, 316. Meigs. Dr. A., on variation in the skulls of the natives of America, 29. Meinecke, on the numerical proportion of the sexes in butter- flies, 283. Melanesians, decrease of, 211. Meldola, Mr., colors and marriage flight of Colias and Pieris, 362. Meliphagidae, Australian nidification of, 517. Melita, secondary sexual characters of, 303. Meloe, difference of color in the sexes of a species of, 333. Meinnon, young, 192. Memory, manifestations of, in animals, 83. Mental characters, difference of, in different races of men, 191; faculties, diversity of, in the same race of men, 30; inheritance of, 31; variation of, in the same species, 31, 74; similarity of the, in dif- ferent races of man, 203; of birds, 466; powers, difference of, in the two sexes in man, 642. Menura Alberti, 461; song of, 421; menura superba, 461; long tails of both sexes of, 513. Merganser, trachea of the male, 425; merganser serrator, male plumage of, 446. Mergus cucullatm, speculum of, 267; mergus merganser, young of, 532. Metallura, splendid tail-feathers of, 503. Methoca ichneumonides, large male of, 316. i, Meves, M., on the drumming of the snipe, 428. Mexicans, civilization of the, not foreign, 164. Meyer, on a convoluted body at the extremity of the tail in a Macacus and a cat, 25. Meyer, Dr. A., on the copulation of Phryganida? of distinct species, 312. Meyer, Prof. L., on development of helix of ear, 16 et seq.; men's ears more variable than women's, 253; antennae serving as ears, 318. Migrations of man, effects of, 53. Migratory instinct of birds, 119; vanquishing the maternal, 122, 128. Mill, J. S., on the origin of the moral sense, 111; on the "greatest happiness principle," 135; on the difference of the mental powers in the sexes of man, 644. Millipedes, 310. Milne-Edwards H., on the use of enlarged chelae of the male Qelammus, 303. Milvago leucurus, sexes and young of, 546. Mimicry, 366. 764 INDEX. Mimus polyglottus, 467. Mind, difference of, in man and the highest animals, 143; similarity of the, in different races, 203. Minnow, proportion of the sexes in the, 282. Mirror, behavior of monkeys before, 709. Mirrors, larks attracted by, 469. Mitchell, Dr., interbreeding in the Hebrides, 215. Mitford, selection of children in Sparta, 32. Mivart, St. George, on the reduction of organs, 13; on the ears of the lemuroidea, 17; on variability of the muscles in lemuroidea, 46, 54; on the caudal vertebrae of monkeys, 65; on the classification of the primates, 174; on the orang and on man, 175; on differences in the lemuroidea, 176; on the crest of the male newt, 395. Mobius, Prof. , on reasoning powers in a pike, 85. Mocking-thrush, partial migration of, 467; young of the, 554. Modifications, unserviceable, 69. Moggridge, J. T., on habits of spiders, 77; on habits of ants, 168. Moles, numerical proportion of the sexes in, 279; battles of male, 570. Mollienesia petenensis, sexual difference in, 382. Mollusca, beautiful colors and shapes of, 298; absence of secondary sexual characters in the, 296. Molluscoida, 181, 296. Monacanthus scopas and M. Peronii, 376. Monboddo, Lord, on music, 653. Mongolians, perfection of the senses in, 38. Monkey, protecting his keeper from a baboon, 117, 125; bonnet, 171; rhesus, sexual difference in color of the, 615, 629; mustache, colors of the, 614. Monkeys, liability of, to the same diseases as man, 7; male, recog- nition of women by, 9; diversity of the mental faculties in, 31; breaking hard fruits with stones, 56; hands of the, 56, 57; basal caudal vertebrae of, imbedded in the body, 66; revenge taken by, 78; maternal affection in, 79; variability of the faculty of attention in, 83; American, manifestation of reason in, 87 ; using stones and sticks, 91; imitative faculties of, 98; signal-ries of, 98; mutual kindnesses of, 115; sentinels posted by, 114; human characters of, 171; American, direction of the hair on the arms of some, 172; grada- tion of species of, 199; beards of, 607; ornamental characters of, 626; analogy of sexual differences of, with those of man, 636; different degrees of difference in the sexes of, 640; expression of emotions by, 652; generally monogamous habits of, 674; polygamous habits of some, 674; naked surfaces of, 686; courtship of, 709. Monogamy, not primitive, 164. Monogenists, 200. Mononychits pseudacori, stridulation of, 345. Monotreniata, 179; development of the nictitating membrane in, 19; lactiferous glands of, 184; connecting mammals with reptiles, 188. Monstrocities, analogous in man and lower animals, 33; caused by arrest of development, 40; correlation of, 49; transmission of, 197. Montagu, (i., on the habits of the black and red grouse, 248; on the pugnacity of the ruff, 409, 410; on the singing of birds, 418^ OU ^b,e double moult of the male pintail, 44ft- INDEX. 765 Monteiro, Mr., on the Bucorax abyssinicus, 435. Monies de Oca, M., on the pugnacity of male humming-birds, 408. Monticola cyanea, 519. Monuments, as traces of extinct tribes, 206. Moose, battles of, 571; horns of the, an incumberance, 587. Moral and instinctive impulses, alliance of, 125; faculties, their in- fluence on natural selection in man, 144; rules, distinction between the higher and lower, 138; sense, so-called, derived from the social instincts, 136; origin of the, 140; tendencies, inheritance of, 140. Morality, supposed to be founded in selfishness, 135; test of, the general warfare of the community, 137; gradual rise of, 141; in- fluence of a high standard of, 149. Morgan, L. H., on the beaver, 75; on the reasoning powers of the beaver, 84; on the forcible capture of wives, 163; on the castoreum of the beaver, 604; marriage unknown in primeval times, 671; on polyandry, 677. Morley, J., on the appreciation of praise and fear of blame, 162. Morris, F. O. , on hawks feeding an orphan nestling, 465. Morse, Dr., colors of mollusca, 298. Morselli, E. , division of the malar bone, 44. Mortality, comparative, of female and male, 244, 275. Morton, on the number of species of man, 199. Moschkau, Dr. A., on a speaking starling, 96. Moschus moschiferus, odoriferous organs of, 605. Motaciilce, Indian, young of, 534. Moth, odoriferous, 349. Moths, 355; absence of mouth in some males, 235; apterous female, 235; male, prehensile use of the tarsi by, 237; male, attracted by females, 284; sound produced by, 349; coloration of, 357; sexual dif- ferences of color in, 358. Motmot, inheritance of mutilation of tail feathers, 67, 689; racket- shaped feathers in the tail of a, 436. Moult, double, 526; double annual, in birds, 443. Moulting of birds, 551. Moults, partial, 444. Mouse, song of, 648. Mustache-monkey, colors of the, 614, 630. Mustaches, in monkeys, 171. Mud-turtle, long claws of the male, 397. Mulattoes, persistent fertility of, 194; immunity of, from yellow fever, 220. Mule, sterility and strong vitality of the, 195. Mules, rational, 88. Miiller, Ferd., on the Mexicans and Peruvians, 164; Fritz; on asto- jnatous males of Tanais, 235; on the disappearance of spots and stripes in adult mammals, 625; on the proportions of the sexes in some Crustacea, 287 ; on secondary sexual characters in various Crustaceans, 300, et seq.; musical contest between male Cicidce, 320; mode of holding wings in Castina, 357; on birds showing a preference for certain colors, 359; on the sexual maturity of young amphipod Crustacea, 552. Muller, Hermann, emergence of bees, from pupa, 242; pollen- gathering of bees, 258; proportion of sexes in bees, 286; courting of ?66 INDEX. EristaUs, 318; color and sexual selection with bees, 331; J., on the nictitating membrane and semilunar fold, 19; Max, on the origin of language, 98; language implies power of general conception, 100; struggle for life among the words, etc., of languages, 102; S., on the banteng, 613; on the colors of Semnopithecus chrysomelas, G13. Muntjac-deer, weapons of the, 586. Murie, J., on the reduction of organs, 13; on the ears of the Lemu- roidea, 17; on variability of the muscles in the Lemuroidea, 46, 54; basal caudal vertebrae of Macacus brunneus imbedded in the body, 67; on the manner of sitting in short-tailed apes, 67; on differences in the Lemuroidea, 176 : on the throat-pouch of the male bustard, 423; on the mane of Otaria jubata, 594; on the sub-orbital pits of Ruminants, 605; on the colors of the sexes in Otaria nigrescens, 610. Murray, A., on the Pediculi of different races of men, 193; T. A,, on the fertility of Australian women with white men, 194. Mus coninga, 91 ; minutus, sexual difference in the color of, 610. Musca vomitoria, 61. Muscicapa grisola, 518; luctuosa, 518; ruticiUa, breeding in imma- ture plumage, 551. Muscle, ischio-pubie, 46. Muscles, rudimentary, occurrence of, in man, 13 ; variability of the 30; effects of use and disuse upon, 36; animal-like abnormalities of, in man, 46; correlated variation of, in the arm and leg, 49; variability of, in the hands and feet, 54; of the jaws, influence of, on the phy- siognomy of the apes, 50; habitual spasms of, causing modifications of the facial bones, 62; of the early progenitors of man, 182; greater variability of the, in men than in women, 252. Muculus sternalis, Prof. Turner, on the, 14. Music, 203; of bird, 417, discordant, love of savages for, 431; reason of power of perception of notes in animals, 648; power of dis- tinguishing notes 649; its connection with primeval speech, 652; dif- ferent appreciation of, by different peoples, 651; origin of, 650, 653; effects of, 651. Musical cadences, perception of, by animals, 649; powers of man, 645, et seq. Musk-deer, canine teeth of male, 572, 586; male, odoriferous organs of the, 604; winter change of the, 619. Musk-duck, Australian, 407; large.size of male, 411; of Guiana, pugnacity of the male, 411. Musk-ox, horns of, 576. Musk-rat, protective resemblance of the, to a clod of earth, 619. Musophagve, colors and nidification of the, 518; both sexes of, equally brilliant, 523. Mussels opened by monkeys, 56. Muxtda, winter change of two species of, 619. Musters, Capt., on Rlwa Darwinii, 545; marriages among Pata- gonians, 683. Mutilations, healing of, 8; inheritance of, 67. Mutttla europcea, stridulation of, 332. Mutillidae, absence of ocelli in female, 311. Mycetes caraya, polygamous, 245; vocal organs of, 602; beard of, 607; sexual differences of color in, 613; voice of, 647; mycetes seni- culus, sexual differences of color in, 613. INDEX. 767 Myriapoda, 310. Naereli, on Nageli, on the influence of natural selection on plants, 68; on the gradation of species of plants, 199. Nails, colored yellow or purple in part of Africa, 655. Narwhal, tusks of the, 572, 578. Nasal cavities, large size of, in American aborigines, 38. Nascent organs, 12. Nathusius, H. von, on the improved breeds of pigs, 201 ; male domesticated animals more variable than females, 252 ; horns of castrated sheep, 577; on the breeding of domestic animals, 680. Natural selection, its effects on the early progenitors of man, 53.- influence of, on man, 67, 70 ; limitation of the principle, 68; in fluence of, on social animals, 70; Mr. Wallace on the limitation of, by the influence of the mental faculties in man, 144; influence of, in the progress of the United States, 161; in relation to sex, 292. Natural and sexual selection contrasted, 256. Naulette, jaw from, large size of the canines in, 46. Neanderthal skull, capacity of the, 61. Neck, proportion of, in soldiers and sailors, 36. Necrophorus, stridulation of, 342, 345. Neetarinia, young of, 533. Necta/rinice, moulting of the, 444; nidification of, 517. Negro, resemblance of a, to Europeans in mental characters, 203. Negro-women, their kindness to Mungo Park, 133. Negroes, Caucasian features in, 190; character of, 191; lice of, 193; fertility of, when crossed with other races, 194; blackness of, 194, 197; variability of, 198, 199; immunity of, from yellow fever, 220; difference of, from Americans, 224; disfigurements of the, 617; color of new-born children of, 635; comparative beardlessness of, 639; readily become musicians, 650; appreciation of beauty of their women by, 659, 661; idea of beauty among, 664; compression of the nose by some, 665. Nernertians, colors of, 299. Neolithic period, 164. Neomorpha, sexual difference of the beak in, 408. NepMa, size of male, 309. Nests, made by fishes, 391; decoration of, by humming-birds, 469. Neumeister, on a change of color in pigeons after several rnoult- ings, 269. Neuration, difference of, in the two sexes of some butterflies and hymenoptera, 314. Neuroptera, 287, 327. Neurothemis, dimorphism in, 329. New Zealand, expectation by the natives of, of their extinction, 218; practice of tattooing in, 657; aversion of natives of, to hairs on the face, 662; pretty girls engrossed by the chiefs in, 680. Newton, A., on the throat-pouch of the male bustard, 423; on the difference between the females of two species of Oxynotus, 536; on the habits of the Phalarope, dotterel and godwit, 544. Newts, 394. Nicholson, Dr., on the non-immunity of dark Europeans from yellow fever, 222. Nictitating membrane, 19, 182. 768 INDEX. Nidification, of fishes, 391; relation of, to color, 515, 519; of British birds, 517. Night-heron, cries of the, 417. Nightingale, arrival of the male before the female, 240; object of the song of the, 418. Nightingales, new mates found by, 463. Nightjar, selection of a mate by the female, 473; Australian, sexs of, 546; coloration of the 559. Nightjars, noise made by some male, with their wings, 426; elon- gated feathers in, 436, 457. Nilghau, sexual differences of color in the, 611. ! Nillson, Prof., on the resemblance of stone arrow-heads from various places, 203; on the development of the horns in the rein- deer, 265. Nipples, absence of, in Monotremata, 184. Nitsche, Dr., ear of fetal orang, 18. Nitzsch, C. L., on the down of birds, 442. Noctuae, brightly colored beneath, 357. Noctuidae, coloration of, 355. Nomadic habits, unfavorable to human progress, 150. Nordmann, A., on Tetrao urogalloides, 460. Norfolk Island, half-breeds on, 217. Norway, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 275. Nose, "resemblance of, in man and the apes, 174; piercing and ornamentation of the, 656; very flat, not admired in negroes, 664; flattening of the, 665. Nott and Gliddon, on the features of Ramesis II, 192; on the features of Amunoph III, 192; on skulls from Brazilian caves, 192; on the immunity of negroes and inulattoes from yellow fever, 220; on the deformation of the skull among American tribes, 665. Nudibranch Mollusca, bright colors of, 296. Numerals, Roman, 163. Nunemaya, natives of, bearded, 639. Nuthatch, of Japan, intelligence of, 466; Indian, 555. Obedience, value of, 147. Observation, powers of, possessed by birds, 467. Occupations, sometimes a cause of diminished stature, 34; effect of, upon the proportions of the body, 34. Ocelli, absence of, in female Mutillidae, 311; of birds, formation and variability of the, 486. Ocelot, sexual differences in the coloring of the, 610. Ocyphaps Iophotes,4i56. Odonata, 287. < Odonestis potatoria, sexual difference of color in, 358. Odor, correlation of, with color of skin, 225; of moths, 349; emitted by snakes in the breeding-season, 399; of mammals, 603. (Ecanthus nivalis, difference of color in the sexes of, 328; cecanthus pellucidus, 328. Ogle, Dr. W. , relation between color and power of smell, 19. Oidemia, 559. Olivier, on sounds produced by Pimelia striata, 347. Omaloplia brunnea, stridulation of, 344. Onitis furcifer, processes of anterior femora of the male, and on the fcead and thorax of the female, 337, 338. INDEX. 769 Onthophagus, 336; onthophagus rangifer, sexual differences of, 335; variation in the horns of the male, 336. Ophidia, sexual differences of, 398. Ophidium, 394. Opossum, wide range of, in America, 193. Optic nerve, atrophy of the, caused by destruction of the eye, 36. Orang-outang, 640; Bischoff on the agreement of the'brain of the, with that of man, 6; adult age of the, 9; ears of the, 15; vermiform appendage of, 23; hands of the, 56; absence of mastoid processes in the, 59; platforms built by the, 75; alarmed at the sight of a turtle, 81; using a stick as a lever, 91; using missiles, 92; using the leaves of the Pandanus as a night covering, 93; direction of the hair on the arms of the, 172; its aberrant characters, 175; supposed evolu- tion of the, 202; voice of the, 602; monogamous habits of the, 674; male, beard of the, 607. Oranges, treatment of, by monkeys, 56. Orange tip butterfly, 350, 354. Orchestia Danvinii, dimorphism of males of, 303 ; orchestia tucuratinga, limbs of, 302, 307. Ordeal, trial by, 108. Oreas canna, colors of 612; areas derbianus, colors of, 612, 621. Organs, prehensile, 237; utilized for new purposes, 651. Organic scale, von Baer's definition of progress in, 186. Orioles, nidification of, 516. Oriolus, species of, breeding in immature plumage, 552; wiolua melanocephalus, coloration of the sexes in, 524. Ornaments, prevalence of similar, 2C3; of male birds, 416; fond- ness of savages for, 654. Ornamental characters, equal transmission of, to both sexes, in mammals, 619; of monkeys, 626. Ornithoptera crcesus, 283. Ornithorynchus, 178 ; reptilian tendency of, 180 ; spur of the male, 573. Orocetes erythrogastra, young of, 554. Orrony, Grotto of, 24. Orsodacna atra, difference of color in the sexes of, 333; orsodacna, ruficollis, 333. Orthoptera, 320; metamorphosis of, 268; stridulating apparatus of, 321, 326; colors of, 327; rudimentary stridulating organs in female, 326; stridulation of the, and Homoptera, discussed, 327. Ortygornis gularis, pugnacity of the male, 412. Oryctes, stridulation of, 344; sexual differences in the stridulant organs of, 345. Oryx lemoryx, use of the horns of, 580, 585, 590. Osphranter rufus, sexual difference in the color of, 609. Ostrich, African, sexes and incubation of the, 544. Ostriches, stripes of young, 529. Otanajubata, mane of the male, 594; otaria nigrescent, difference in the coloration of the sexes of, 610. Otis bengalensis, love-antics of the male, 432; otis tarda, throat- pouch of the male, 423; polygamous, 248. Ouzel, ring, colors and niditication of the, 518; water, singing in the autumn, 420; colors and nidification of the, 518. 770 INDEX. Ovibos moschatus, horns of, 576. Ovipositor of insects, 235. Oms cycloceros, mode of fighting of, 579, 585. Ovule of man, 9. Owen, Prof. , on the Corpora Wolffiana, 10; on the great toe in man, 10; on the nictitating membrane and semilunar fold, 19; on the development of the posterior molars in different races of man, 22; on the length of the ccecuin in the Koala, 23; on the coccygeal verte- brae, 25; on rudimentary structures belonging to the reproductive system, 26; on abnormal conditions of the human uterus, 43; on the number of digits in the Ichthyopterygia, 42; on the canine teeth in man, 45; on the walking of the chimpanzee and orang, 56; on the mastoid processes in the higher apes, 59; on the hairiness of ele- phants in elevated districts, 64; on the caudal vertebras of monkeys, 65; classification of mammalia, 168; on the hair in monkeys, 171; on the piscine affinities of the Ichthyosaurians, 180; on polygamy and monogamy among the antelopes, 246; on the horns of Antilocapra americana, 265; on the musky odor of the crocodiles during the breeding- season, 398; on the scent-glands of snakes, 399; on the Dugong, Cachalot and Ornithwhynclms, 572, 573; on the antlers of the red deer, 582; on the dentition of the Canielidse, 586; on the horns of the Irish elk, 587; on the voice of the giraffe, porcupine and stag, 600; on the laryngeal sac of the gorilla and oraug, 602; on the odoriferous glands of mammals, 604, 605; on the effects of emascula- tion on the vocal organs of men, 645; on the voice of Hylobates agilis, 647 ; on American monogamous monkeys, 674. Owls, white, new mates found by, 463. Oxynotus, difference of the females of two species of, 536. Pachydermata, 247. Pachytylus migratorius. 321. Paget, on the abnormal development of hairs in man, 20; on the thickness of the skin on the soles of the feet of infants, 37. Pagurus, carrying the female, 303. Painting, pleasure of savages in, 203. Palcemon, chelae of a species of, 302. Palceornis, sexual differences of color in, 562; palceornis javanicus, color of beak of, 525; palceornis rosa, young of, 532. Palamedea cornuta, spurs on the wings, 414. Paleolithic period, 164. Palestine, habits of the chaffinch in, 281. Pallas, on the perfection of the senses in the Mongolians, 38; on the want of connection between climate and the color of the skin, 219; on the polygamous habits of AntUope Saiga, 246; on the lighter color of horses and cattle in winter in Siberia, 260; on the tusks of the musk-deer, 586; on the odoriferous glands of mammals, 604; on the odoriferous glands of the musk-deer, 605; on winter changes of color in mammals, 619; on the ideal of female beauty in North China, 659. Palmaris at-cessorius, muscle variations of the, 30. Pampas, horses of the, 206. Pangenesis, hypothesis of, 258, 261. Pannicul'is carnosus, 14. Pansch, on the brain of a foetal Cebus apella, 233. INDEX, 771 Papilio, proportion of the sexes in North American species of, 283; sexual differences of coloring in species of, 351; coloration of the wings in species of, 354. Papilio ascanius, 251; papilio sesostris and chUdrencs, variability of, 362, papilio ttirnus, 283. Papilionidae, variability in the, 362. Papuans, line of separation between the, and the Malays, 192; beards of the, 639; hair of, 655; and Malays, contrast in characters of, 191. Paradise, birds of, 460, 526; supposed by Lesson to be polygamous, 248; rattling of their quills by. 426; racket-shaped feathers in, 437; sexual differences in color of, 438; decomposed feathers in, 437, 457: display of plumage by the male, 449; sexual differences in color of- 559. Paradisea apoda, barbless feathers in the tail of, 437; plumage of, 438; and P. papuana, 437, 438; divergence of the females of, 535; increase of beauty with age, 552 ; paradisea papuana, plumage of, 535. Paraguay, Indians of, eradication of eyebrows and eyelashes by, 662. Parallelism of development of species and languages, 102. Parasites, on man and animals, 8; as evidence of specific identity or distinctness, 193; immunity from, correlated with color, 220. Parental feeling in earwigs, star-fishes and spiders, 120; affection, partly a result of natural selection, 119. Parents, age of, influence upon sex of offspring, 277. Parinee, sexual difference of color in, 521. Park,; Mungo, negro-women teaching their children to love the truth, 133; his treatment by the negro-women, 133, 642; on negro opinions of the appearance of white men, 660. Parker, Mr., no bird or reptile in line of mammalian descent, 179. Paroquet, young of, 525, 549 ; Australian, variation in the color of the thighs of a male, 481. Parrot, racket-shaped feathers in the tail of a, 436; instance of benevolence in a, 467. Parrots, change of color in, 68; imitative faculties of, 82; living in triplets, 464; affection of, 467; colors and nidifications of the, 518, 520, 521; immature plumage of the, 532; colors of, 557; sexual dif- ferences of color in, 562; musical powers of, 651. Parthenogenesis in the Tenthredinse, 286 ; in Cynipidse, 286; in Crustacea, 287. Partridge, monogamous, 248; proportion of the sexes in the, 280; Indian, 412; female, 538; "dances," 431, 460. Partridges, living in triplets, 464; spring coveys of male, 464; dis- tinguishing persons, 467. Parus c&ruleus, 521. Passer, sexes and young of, 550; passer bracliydactylus, 550; passer domesticus, 518, 550; passer montanus, 518, 550. Patagonians, self-sacrifice by, 126; marriages of, 683. Patterson, Mr., on the Agrionidae, 329. Patteson, Bishop, decrease of Melanesians, 211. Pavo cristatus, 267, 489; pavo muticus, 267 489; possession of spurs by the female, 413, 511; paw nigripennii, 470. 772 INDEX. Payaguas Indians, thin legs and thick arms of the, 37. Payan, Mr., on the proportion of the sexes in sheep, 279. Peacock, polygamous, 248; sexual characters of, 267; pugnacity of the, 413; Javan, possessing spurs, 413; rattling of the quills by, 426; elongated tail-coverts of the, 435, 457; love of display of the, 447, 490; ocellated spots of the, 489; inconvenience of long tail of the, to the female, 505, 513, 514; continued increase of beauty of the, 552; butterfly, 354. Peafowl, preference of females for a particular male, 475; first advances made by the female, 477. Pediculi of domestic animals and man, 193. Pedigree of man, 188. Pedionomus tarquatus, sexes of, 542. Peel, J., on horned sheep, 576. Peewit, wing-tubercles of the male, 414. Pelagic animals, transparency of, 295. Pelecanus erythrorhynchus, horny crest on the beak of the male, during the breeding-season, 442; pelecanus onocrotalus, spring plumage of, 446. Pelele, an African ornament, 657. Pelican, blind, fed by his companions, 116; young, guided by old birds, 116; pugnacity of the male, 411. Pelicans, fishing in concert, 114. Pelobius Ilermanni, stridulation of, 343, 345. Pelvis, alteration of, to suit the erect attitude of man, 59; differ- ences of the, in the sexes of man , 635. Penelope nigra, sound produced by the male, 429. Pennant, on the battles of seals, 571; on the bladder- nose seal, 603. Penthe, antennal cushions of the male, 313. Perch, brightness of the male, during breeding-season, 386. Peregrine falcon, new mate found by, 463. Period of variability, relation of, to sexual selection, 271. Periodicity, vital, Dr. Lay cock on, 8. Periods, lunar, followed by functions in man and animals, 8, 187; of life, inheritance at corresponding, 258, 262. Perisoreus canadensis, young of, 549. Peritnchia, difference of color in the sexes of a species of, 333. Periwinkle, 296. Pernis cristata, 481. Perrier, M., on sexual selection, 237; on bees, 332, Perseverance, a characteristic of man, 644. Persians, said to be improved by intermixture with Georgians ant Circassians, 669. Personnat, M., on Bombyx Yamamai, 283. Peruvians, civilization of the, not foreign, 164 Petrels, colors of, 562. Petroeincla cyanea, young of, 554. Petrocossyphus, 525. Petronia, 550. Pfeiffer, Ida, on Javan ideas of beauty, 661, PhacocJiwrus athiopicus, tusks and pads of, 592. Phalanger, Vulpine, black varieties of the, 616. INDEX. 773 Phalaropus fulicarius, 544; phalaropus hyperboreus, 544. PhanatU, 338; phanceus carnifex, variation of the horna of the male, 336; phanceus faunus, sexual difference of, 335; phanceui lancifer, 336. Paaseolarctus cinereus, taste for rum and tobacco, 7. Phasgonura mridissima, stridulation of, 322, 323. Phasianus Sfemmerringii, 507; phasianus versicolor, 449: phasianus Wallichii, 454, 538. Pheasant, polygamous, 248; and black grouse, hybrids of, 470; production of hybrids with the common fowl, 477; immature plumage of the, '532; Amherst, display of, 449; Argus 435, 526; display of plumage by the male, 451; ocellated spots of the, 488, 493; gradation of characters in the, 493; blood, 413; cheer, 454; eared, 267, 454, 538; length of the tail in the, 513; sexes alike in the, 524 ; fire-backed, possessing spurs, 413 ; golden, display of plumage by the male, 449; age of mature plumage in the, 551; sex of young, ascertained by pulling out head-feathers, 551; Kalij, drumming of the male, 426, 533; Reeve's, length of the tail in, 514; silver, triumphant male, deposed on account of spoiled plumage, 476 , sexual coloration of the, 560 ; Scemmerring's, 507, 514 ; Tragopan, 434; display of plumage by the male, 451; marking of the sexes of the, 487. Pheasants, period of acquisition of male characters in the family of the, 266; proportion of sexes in chicks of, 280; length of the tail in, 507, 513, 514. Philters, worn by women, 659. Phoca grcenlandica, sexual difference in the coloration of, 611. Phwnicura ruticilla, 464. Phosphorescence of insects, 314. Phryganidae, copulation of distinct species of, 313. Phryniscus nigricans, 396. Physical inferiority, supposed, of man, 67. Pickering, on the number of species of man, 199. Picton, J. A., on the soul of man, 700. Picus auratus, 411; pieus major, 456. Pieris, 354, 361. Pigeon, female, deserting a weakened mate, 243; carrier, late development of the wattle in, 269; pouter, late development of the crop in, 269; domestic, breeds and sub-breeds of, 523. Pigeons, nestling, fed by the secretion of the crop of both parents, 185; changes of plumage in, 259; transmission of sexual peculiarities in, 261; Belgian, with black-streaked males, 262, 269, 507; changing color after several moul tings, 269; numerical proportion of the sexes in, 280; cooing of, 425; variations in plumage of, 438; display of plumage by male, 456; local memory of, 467; antipathy of female, to certain males, 475; pairing of, 475; profligate male and female, 475; wing-bars and tail-feathers of, 486; supposititious breed of, 506; pouter and carrier, peculiarities of, predominant in males, 508; nidifi- cation of, 516; Australian, 522; immature plumage of the, 532. Pigs, origin of the improved breeds of, 202; numerical proportion of the sexes in, 279; stripes of young, 529, 623; tusks of miocene, 693; sexual preference shown by, 598. Pike, American, brilliant colors of the male, during the breeding' 774 INDEX. seasons. C86; reasoning powers of, 85; male, devoured l>y females, 281. Pike, L. O., OB the psychical elements of religion, 108. Pimelia striata, sounds produced by the female, 347. Pinel, hairiness in idiots, 41. Pintail, drake, plumage of, 446; pairing with a wild duck, 471; duck, pairing with a widgeon, 471. Pipe-fish, filamentous, 390; marsupial receptacles of the male, 392. Pipits, moulting of the, 444. Pipra, modified secondary wing-feathers of the male, 429; pipra deliciosa, 429, 430. Pirates stridulus, stridulation of, 319. Pitcairn Island, half-breeds on, 217. Pithecia leucocephala, sexual differences of color in, 613; pithecia satanas, beard of, 607; resemblance of, to a negro, 690. Pits, suborbital, of Ruminants, 604. Pittidse, nidification of, 516. Placentata, 179. Plagiostomous fishes, 375. Plain-wanderer, Australian, 542. Planaria, bright colors of some, 295. Plantain-eaters, colors and nidificatioa of the, 518; both sexes of, equally brilliant, 523. Plants, cultivated, more fertile than wild, 50; Nageli, on natural selection in, 68; male flowers of, mature before the female, 240; phenomena of fertilization in, 251. Platalea, 425, change of plumage in, 525. Platyblemnus, 328. Platycercus, young of, 549. Platyphyllum concavum, 321, 324. Platyrrhine monkeys, 174. Plntysma myoides, 14. Plecostomus, head-tentacles of the males of a species of, 384; plecostomus barbatus, peculiar beard of the male, 383. Plectropterus gambcnsds, spurred wings of, 414. Ploceus, 420, 426, 460. Plovers, wing-spurs of, 414; double moult in, 442, 444. Plumage, changes of, inheritance of, by fowls, 259; tendency t* analogous variation in, 438; display of, by male birds, 447, 455; changes of, in relation to season, 526; immature, of birds, 529, 530; color of, in relation to protection, 556. Plumes on the head in birds, differences of, in the sexes, 513. Pneumora, structure of, 325. Podica, sexual difference in the color of the irides of, 483. Poeppig, on the contact of civilized and savage races, 208. Poison, avoidance of, by animals, 90. Poisonous fruits and herbs avoided by animals, 75. Poisons, immunity from, correlated with color, 220. Polish fowls, origin of the crest in, 261. Pollen and van Dam, on the colors of Lemur macaco, 613. Polyandry, 677; in certain Cyprinidte, 282; among the Elateridw, 286. Polydactylisrn in man, 42, INDEX. 775 Polygamy, influence of, upon sexual selection, 245; superinduced by domestication, 249; supposed increase of female births by, 277; in the stickleback, 376. Polygenists, 200. Polynesia, prevalence of infanticide in, 676. Polynesians, wide geographical range of, 38; difference of stature among the, 35; crosses of, 198; variability of, 198; heterogeneity of the, 219; aversion of, to hairs on the face, 662. Polyplectron, number of spurs in, 413; display of plumage by tht> male, 450; gradation of characters in, 490; female of, 536; polyplect- ron chinquis, 450, 491 ; polyplectron hardwickii, 491 ; polyplectron malaccense, 491, 492. Polyplectron Napoleonis, 490, 492. Polyzoa, 296. Pomotis, 391. Pontoporeia affinis, 300. Porcupine, mute, except in the rutting- season, 600. Pores, excretory, numerical relation of, to the hairs in sheep, 225. PorpitcB, bright colors of some, 295. Portax picta, dorsal crest and throat-tuft of, 606; sexual differences of color in, 611, 612, 621. Portunus puber, pugnacity of, 304. Potamochcerus penicillatus, tusks and facial knobs of the, 593. Pouchet G., the relation of instinct to intelligence, 75; on the instincts of ants, 168; on the caves of Abou-Simbel, 191; on the immunity of negroes from yellow fever, 220; change of color in fishes, 390. Pouter-pigeon, late development of the large crop in, 269. Powell, Dr., on stridulation, 319. Power, Dr., on the different colors of the sexes in a species of Squilla, 306. Powys, Mr., on the habits of the chaffinch in Corfu, 281. Pre-eminence of man, 54. Preference for males by female birds, 470, 477; shown by mammals, in pairing, 595. Prehensile organs, 237. Presbytis entellus, fighting of the male, 641. Preyer, Dr., on function of shell of ear, 15; on supernumerary mammae in women, 41. Prichard, on the difference of stature among the Polynesians, 35; on the connection between the breadth of the skull in the Mongolians and the perfection of their senses, 38; on the capacity of BritisG. skulls of different ages, 61; on the flattened heads of the Colombian savages, 655; on Siamese notions of beauty, 659; on the beardlessness of the Siamese, 663; on the deformation of the head among American tribes and the natives of Arakhan, 665. Primary sexual organs, 234. Primates, 170, 283; sexual differences of color in, 613. Primogeniture, evils of, 153. Prionidae, difference of the sexes in color, 333. Proctotretus multimaculatus, 406; proctotretus t&nuis, sexual differ* ence in the color of, 406. Profligacy, 155. 776 INDEX. Progenitors, early, of man, 182. Progress, not the normal rule in human society, 150; elements of, 159. Prong-horn antelope, horns of, 265. Proportions, difference of, in distinct races, 190. Protective coloring in butterflies, 353; in lizards, 406; in birds, 539, 556; in mammals, 619; nature of the dull coloring of female Lepidoptera, 363, 364, 367; resemblances in fishes, 390. Protozoa, absence of secondary sexual characters in, 294. Pruner-Bey, on the occurrence of the supra- condyloid foramen in the humerus of man, 24; on the color of negro infants, 636. Prussia, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 275. Psocus, proportions of the sexes in, 287. Ptarmigan, monogamous, 248; summer and winter plumage of the, 443, 444; nuptial assemblages of, 460; triple moult of the, 526; pro- tective coloration of, 540. Puff-birds, colors and nidification of the, 518. Pugnacity of fine-plumaged male birds, 454. Pumas, stripes of young, 528. Puppies learning from cats to clean their faces, 82. Pycnonotus Iwmorrhous, pugnacity of the male, 409; display of under tail coverts by the male, 456. Pyranga (estiva, male aiding in incubation, 515; male characters in female of, 525. . Pyrodes, difference of the sexes in color, 333. Quadrumaua, hands of, 56; differences between man and the, 170; sexual differences of color in, 612; ornamental characters of, 626; analogy of sexual differences of, with those of man, 634; fighting of males for the females, 641; monogamous habits of, 674; beards of the, 688. Quain, R., on the variation of the muscles in man, 30. Quatrefages, A. de, on the occurrence of a rudimentary tail in man, 25; on variability, 33; on the moral sense as a distinction between man and animals, 110; civilized men stronger than savages, 154; on the fertility of Australian women with white men, 194 ; on the Paulistas of Brazil, 197; on the evolution of the breeds of cattle, 201; on the Jews, 220; on the liability of negroes to tropical fevers after residence in a cold climate, 221 ; on the difference between field and house slaves, 223; on the influence of climate on color, 223; colors of annelids, 299; on the Ainos, 639; on the women of San Uiuliano, 670. Quechua, see Quichua. Querquedula acuta, 471. Quetelet, proportion of sexes in man, 275; relative size in man and woman, 276. Quichua Indians, 38; local variation of color in the, 223; no gray hair among the, 637; hairlessness of the, 640; long hair of the, 662. Quiscalus major, 255; proportion of the sexes of, in Florida and Honduras, 281. Rabbit, white tail of the, 619. Rabbits, domestic, elongation of the skull in, 63; modification of the skull in, by the lopping of the cnr, 63; danger-signals of, 114; numerical proportion of tjje aexes in. 279 INDEX. 777 Races, distinctive characters of, 190, 191; or species of man, 191; crossed, fertility or sterility of, 194; of man, variability of tlie, 198; of man, resemblance of, in mental characters, 203; formation of, 206; of man, extinction of, 206; effects of the crossing of, 218; of man, formation of the, 218; of man, children of the, 635; beardless, aver- sion of, to hairs on the face, 662. Raffles, Sir S., on the banteng, 613. Rafts, use of, 54, 205. Rage, manifested by animals, 77. Raia bat is, teeth of, 379; raid clavata, female spined on the back, 375; sexual difference in the teeth of, 379; raia maculata, teeth of, 379. RaiU\, spur- winged, 414. Rain, mode of fighting of the, 579; African, mane of an, 608; fat- tailed, 608. Rameses II, features of, 192. Ramsay, Mr., on the Australian muck-duck, 407; on the regent- bird, 470; on the incubation of Menura superba, 513. Sana esculenta, vocal sacs of, 397. Rat, common, general dispersion of, a consequence of superior cunning, 91; supplantation of the native, in New Zealand, by the European rat, 218; common, said to be polygamous, 247; numerical proportion of the sexes in, 279. Rats, enticed by essential oils, 603. Rationality of birds, 466. Rattlesnakes, difference of the sexes in the, 398; rattles as a call, 401. Raven, vocal organs of the, 421; stealing bright objects, 469; pied, of the Feroe Islands, 482. Rays, prehensile organs of male, 375. Razor-bill, young of the, 553. Reade, Win wood, suicide among savages in Africa, 133; mulattoes not prolific, 195; effect of castration of horned sheep, 577; on the Guinea sheep, 266; on the occurrence of a mane in an African ram, 608; on singing of negroes, 652; on the negroes appreciation of the beauty of their women, 658; on the admiration of negroes for a black skin, 660; on the idea of beauty among negroes, 663; on the Jollofs, 670; on the marriage-customs of the negroes, 684. Reason in animals, 84. Redstart, American, breeding in immature plumage, 552. Redstarts, new mates found by, 464. Reduvidse, stridulation of, 319. Reed-bunting, head-feathers of the male, 455; attacked by a bull- finch, 468. Reefs, fishes frequenting, 389. Reeks, H., retention of horns by breeding deer, 574; cow rejected by a bull, 598; destruction of piebald rabbits by cats, 619. Regeneration, partial, of lost parts in man, 8. Regent-birds, 470. Reindeer, horns of the, 264; battles of, 571; horns of the female, 574; antlers of, with numerous points, 582; winter change of the, 619; sexual preferences shown by, 598. Relationship, terms of, 675. 778 INDEX. Religion, deficiency of among certain races, 106; psychical elements of, 107. Remorse, 129; deficiency of, among savages, 149. Rengger, on the diseases of Cebus Azar&, 7; on the diversity of the mental faculties of msnkeys. 31; on the Payaguas Indians, 37; on the inferiority of Europeans to savages in their senses, 38; revenge taken by monkeys, 78; on maternal affection in a Cebus, 79; on the reasoning powers of American monkeys, 87; on the use of stones by monkeys for cracking hard nuts, 91; on the sounds uttered by Ctbus Azarai, 95; on the signal-cries of monkeys, 98; on the polygamous habits of Mycetes car ay a, 246; on the voice of the howling monkeys, 602; on the odor of Cermis campestris, 604; on the beards of Mycetes caraya and Pithecia Satanas, 607; on the colors of Felis mitis, 610; on the colors of Cervus paludous, 613; on sexual differences of color in Mycetes, 613; on the color of the infant Guaranys, 636; on the early maturity of the female of Cebes Azara, 636; on the beards' of the Guaranys, 639; on the emotional notes employed by monkeys, 652; on American polygamous monkeys, 674. Representative species, of birds, 533. Reproduction, unity of phenomena of, throughout the mammalia, 8; period of, in birds, 551. Reproductive system, rudimentary structures in the, 26; accessory parts of, 183. Reptiles, 397. Reptiles and birds, alliance of, 188. Resemblances, small, between man and the apes, 171. Retrievers, exercise of reasoning faculties by, 88. Revenge, manifested by animals, 78. Reversion, 41; perhaps the cause of some bad dispositions, 155. Rhagium, difference of color in the sexes of a species of, 833. Rhamphastos cannatus, 560. Rhea Daricinii, 545. Rhinoceros, nakedness of, 64; horns of, 576; horns of, used defens- ively, 590; attacking white or gray horses, 617. Rhyncluw, sexes and young of, 543; rhyncJicea amtralis, 543; rhynchcea bengalensis, 543; rhynch&a capensis, 543. Rhythm, perception of, by animals, 649. Richard, M., on rudimentary muscles in man, 13. Richard, Sir J., on the pairing of Tetrao umbellus, 416; on Tetrao urophasianus, 423; on the drumming of grouse, 423, 427; on the dances of Tetrao phasianellus, 431; on assemblages of grouse, 460; on the battles of male deer, 571; on the reindeer, 574; on the horns of the musk-ox, 576 ; on antlers of the reindeer with numerous points, 582; on the moose, 587; on the Scotch deerhound, 589. Richter, Jean Paul, on imagination, 84. Riedel, on profligate female pigeons, 475. Riley, Mr., on mimicry in butterflies, 367; bird's disgust at taste of certain caterpillars, 370. Ring-ouzel, colors and nidification of the, 518. Ripa, Father, on the difficulty of distinguishing the races of the Chinese, 190. Rivalry, in singing, between male birds, 419. River-hog, African, tusks and knobs of the, 598. INDEX. 779 Rivers, analogy of, to islands, 181. Roach, brightness of the male during breeding-season, 886. Robbery, of strangers, considered honorable, 133. Robertson, Mr. , remarks on the development of the horns in the roebuck and red-deer, 265. Robin, pugnacity of the male, 408; autumn song of the, 420; female singing of the, 420; attacking other birds with red in their plumage, 408; young of the, 547. Kobinet, on the difference of size of the male and female cocoons of the silk-moth, 315. Rodents, uterus in the, 43; absence of secondary sexual characters in, 247; sexual differences in the colors of, 609. Roe, winter changes of the, 619. Rohfs, Dr., Caucasian features in negro, 190; fertility of mixed races in Sahara, 195; colors of birds in Sahara, 557; ideas of beauty among the Bornuans, 663. Rolle, F., on the origin of man, 3; on a change in German families settled in Georgia, 223. Roller, harsh cry of, 421. Romans, ancient, gladiatorial exhibitions of the, 139. Rook, voice of the, 426. Rossler, Dr. , on the resemblance of the lower surface of butterflies to the bark of trees, 353. Rostrum, sexual difference in the length of, in some weevils, 235. Royer, Madlle., mammals giving suck, 186. Rudimentary organs, 12; origin of, 26. Rudiments, presence of, in languages, 102. Rudolphi, on the want of connection between climate and the color of the skin, 219. Ruff, supposed to be polygamous, 248; proportion of the sexes in the, 280; pugnacity of the, 409; double moult in, 443, 445; duration of dances of, 460; attraction of the, to bright objects, 469. Ruminants, male, disappearance of canine teeth in, 60, 641 ; generally polygamous, 246; suborbital pits of, 604; sexual differences of color in, 611. Rupicola crocea, display of plumage by the male, 448. Ruppell, on canine teeth in deer and antelopes, 586. Russia, numerical proportion of male and female births in, ' 243, 275. Euticilla, 525. Rutmeyer, Prof., on the physiognomy of the apes, 60; on tusks of miocene boar, 593; on the sexual differences of monkeys, 640. Rutlandshire, numerical proportion of male and female births in, 274. Sachs, Prof., on the behavior of the male and female elements in fertilization, 252. Sacrifices, human, 108. Sagittal crest in male apes and Australians, 636. Sahara, fertility of mixed races in, 195; birds of the, 519; animal inhabitants of the, 557. Sailors, growth of, delayed by conditions of life, 34 ; long- sighted, 38. Sailors and soldiers, difference in the proportions of, 36. 780 INDEX. St. John, Mr. , on the attachment of mated birds, 466. St. Kilda, beards of the inhabitants of, 638. Salmo eriox and 8. umbla, coloring of the male, during the breed, ing-season, 886. Salmo lycaodon, 378; salmo solar, 377. Salmon, leaping out of fresh water, 122; male, ready to breed before the female, 240; proportion of the sexes in, 282; male, pug- nacity of the, 377; male, characters of, during the breeding-season, 377, 386; spawning of the, 390; breeding of immature male, 552. Salvin, 0., inheritance of mutilated feathers, 67, 436, 689; on the humming-birds, 248, 516; on the numerical proportion of the sexes in humming-birds, 281, 555; on Chamcrpetes and Penelope, 429; on Selasphorus platycercus, 429; Pipra deliciosa, 429; on Chasmorhyn- chus, 442. Samoa Islands, beardlessness of the natives of, 639, 663. Sandhoppers, claspers of male, 307. Sand-skipper, 305. Sandwich Islands, variation in the skulls of the natives of the, 29; decrease of native population, 211; population of, 290; superiority of the nobles in the, 669; Islanders, lice of, 193. San-Giuliano, women of, 670. Santali, recent rapid increase of the, 51; Mr. Hunter on the, 218. Saphirina, characters of the males of, 306. Sarkidiornis melanonotus, characters of the young, 529. Sars, O., on Pontoporeia affinis, 300. Saturnia carpini, attraction of males by the female, 284; saturnia