THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Ex Libris [ C. K. OGDEN CONVENTIONAL CANT. a " Sidney Whitman shows to keen a sense of the present parlous condition of art and the demoralization of artists that we may look to him for guidance. SATURDAY REVIEW. FETISH WORSHIP IN THE FINE ARTS. SIDNEY WHITMAN. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3*. 6d. REMINGTON & CO., 18, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. "If Mr. S. Whitman's little book possessed more literary finish and sobriety of expression it would be by no means unworthy of attention." Westminster Review. "This sharply critical sketch of the present condition of the drama, music, and painting touches many weak points, . . . many will echo the ridicule heaped upon those who ' worship hysterical intensity for true intellectuality,' and ' bow down before what is diseased in a literary and artistic sense.' " Daily Chronicle. "Mr. Sidney. Whitman writes vigorously against one-man rule generally, in ' Fetish Worship in the Fine Arts.' . . . Mr. Whitman is undoubtedly right in thinking that there is much that is repulsive to common sense in the way in which the crowd of men and women rush unintelligently after what has become the rage, whether it be a theatrical star or an eminent painter." Graphic. "... There is much in his observations that deserves consideration. His remarks tend in the direction of a higher general standard of thought, as dis- tinguished from the mere following of a fashionable sentiment in any of the phases of art from time to time." {3^. " There is no denying that for a good deal of his pungent animadversion there is more or less of justification to be urged. . . . Mr. Whitman's essay will be found a piquant bit of reading." Scotsman. " The general public are indebted to Mr. Whitman for an energetic attempt to bestow upon them the dubious ' giftie to see themsels as ithers see them.' "- Whitehall Review. "... There is so much truth in what the author says, there is so much ' Fetish- worship ' to combat, that his little book may not be without service, and so far it is deserving of welcome. Plain-speaking is a good thing in these days of compromise, and for some earnest and thoroughly justified plain-speaking the author of ' Fetish Worship in the Fine Arts ' deserves thanks." Glasgow Herald. "... The author of ' Fetish Worship ' is a person of taste ... he tells the plain truth about a good many matters, and his book may help us out of the night, to use his own phrase, and show us where common-sense has got to." Life. "... He is undoubtedly possessed of a right-minded appreciation of genius, and a healthy contempt for hypocrisy and hunting with the multitude." Lady. "... Its manliness is refreshing." Fifeshire Journal, CONVENTIONAL CANT 77S XSULTS AND REMEDY BY ' SIDNEY WHITMAN LONDON KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH & CO., I, PATERNOSTER SQUARE 1887 (TJie rights of translation and of 'reproduction are reserved.) My muse by no means deals in fiction, She gathers a repertory of facts ; And that's one cause she meets with contradiction For too much truth, at first sight, ne'er attracts ; And were her object only what's called glory With more ease too she'd tell a different story. BYRON. PREFACE. THE idiosyncrasy of which I purpose to treat I have called " Conventional Cant," in order to avoid, at the outset, the suspicion of referring to simple religious hypocrisy, which is common to humanity at large, and with which, specially, my work has nothing to do. It may seem presumptuous, if not audacious, to describe Cant as our national failing, as an idiosyn- crasy which taints us collectively, whilst we boast so large an amount of individual moral excellence. Now, a daring procedure calls for a justification, or, at least, for an explanation to start with, and for that purpose I append a few quotations from the writings of some of the most acute thinkers of our time. Schopenhauer tells us : " To deny what is bad Vlll PREFACE. is a duty towards what is good ; for to him who holds naught to be bad, nothing can seem good." "Idiosyncrasies are pepper and spices of question- able aroma," according to George Eliot ; and then, again, she has the following : " Whilst on some points of social duty public opinion has reached a tolerably high standard, on others a public opinion is not yet born, and there are even some functions and practices with regard to which men far above the line in honourableness of nature feel hardly any scrupulosity, though their consequent behaviour is easily shown to be as injurious as bribery, or any other slow poisonous procedure which degrades the social vitality." If this be so, it is not my fault that my descrip- tion of our Cant will not turn out to be a hymn of praise. And if I should be met with the objection that there is no necessity to lay bare what is ugly, whilst we can glory in what is beautiful, I would respectfully submit, that it is a less worthy task to point to the glorious rays of our national sun, which all of us can only too readily discern, than to draw attention to some spots on its surface. John Stuart Mill has it : "I do not know how a public writer can be more usefully employed than in telling his countrymen their faults. If so doing PREFACE. IX is to be considered anti-national, I am not at all desirous to avoid the charge." This book does not attempt to preserve the dramatic or rhetoric unities, though this is always desirable. The fault, if any, lies partly in the subject, if the title be unattractive or even re- pellent, and the work itself incongruous in treat- ment something like Sindbad's old man of the sea or Caliban in their physical proportions. But having set myself to describe what I feel bound to deprecate, I am powerless to alter the conditions of the task. They involve the necessity of con- stant reiteration and comparison, perhaps even beyond what might be termed either harmonious or agreeable. And, though comparisons are odious, I contend that, as physical anatomy cannot get on without them, so anatomy of custom and character, if undertaken at all, cannot forego their employment. In pointing to many instances of friction in the social body, to want of harmony of colour and feel- ing in our midst, I am aware of the one-sidedness of the task. I am not only fully conscious of short- comings of treatment, but, what is of more im- portance, I am fully conscious of laying myself open to the charge of fault-finding in a mean spirit for the mere gratification of so doing. Human X PREFACE. nature is, perhaps, not above finding pleasure in such a proceeding, though many may be unwilling to admit it. But, then, we are so little inclined to admit anything, except our antagonist pins us to the figurative wall, and leaves us no option but a graceless surrender. This much is clear to me, and yet I hold that mere fault-finding unless it bear the distinct marks of a disordered liver, and thus is apt to render us impatient is not only justifiable, but beneficial, even if no remedy be pointed out, and no lights thrown-in to blend with the dark shadows, so long as honesty of purpose is apparent. That such honesty of purpose should be apparent is my earnest wish. It has been the main-spring that prompted me to write, and I can only hope it may have leapt from my heart and impressed itself on these pages. But I do not trust to making clear what my motives may have been ; I must be pre- pared to find them misunderstood and sneered at ; and I will therefore endeavour to supply my justi- fication in pointing out, in conclusion, to the best of my ability, the remedy for what I find fault with. If somewhat Utopian in this, I doubt not that many may opine I make up for it in the despairing pessimism of my description of the evils PREFACE. xi from which we suffer. Even if it be thought necessary to tone down a little the ills I have pictured, and the remedies I suggest, I shall still consider that I have not laboured in vain, if it causes others to discriminate and to guide, where I have felt only able to grope in the dark, in the desire to gain light. THE AUTHOR. CONTENTS. CHAPTER PAGE PREFACE ... ... ... ... vii INTRODUCTION ... ... ... xv I. PHARISAISM ... ... ... ... i II. CANT DEFINED AND TRACED ... ... 22 III. SOCIAL CANT ... ... ... ... 36 IV. CANT IN OUR MANNERS ... ... 58 V. CANT IN THE PRESS ... ... ... 84 VI. CANT IN POLITICS ... ... ... 107 VII. CANT .IN OUR PRINCIPLES ... ... 139 VIII. THE RESULTS AND REVOLT ... ... 167 IX. REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION ... ... 204 INTRODUCTION. "Strike, but.hear me." "We laugh heartily to see a whole flock of sheep jump because one did so : might not one imagine that human beings do the same and for exactly the same reason?" GREVILLE. IN showing up our Cant, I mean to point to the unhealthy influence it exercises over our thought and action, even now that we are on the eve of tremendous social and political changes, if we are not already in the midst of them. In doing so, I am conscious of wading through a morass, in which one is only too likely to lose one's-self and to grope after a Will-o'-the-wisp. The danger of coming to hasty and one-sided conclusions must be guarded against by disclaiming any pretension to infal- libility of statement in detail, and by basing my hopes on the expectation that any little inaccuracies or fallacies may be forgotten by the reader, if I succeed in convey- ing an impression of truth and honesty of purpose on the whole. After stating that our conventional cant exercises an XVI INTRODUCTION. undue and unhealthy influence, I endeavour to present proofs by quoting a number of instances in all spheres of its action. But these alone, however numerous, would hardly suffice. I therefore endeavour to show, by a few side-lights and comparisons, how disastrously our cant has acted by indirect processes on the different classes of the community ; how it has intensified the selfishness of the privileged classes, and is mainly answerable for the vulgarity and fawning snobbishness of the middle classes ; and, last but not least, how it is partly answerable for the undue isolation, wretchedness, and degradation of our poor. To trace part of the miseries of the latter to the sins of the former, and to suggest some hope for the future, is the ultimate aim of these pages. In attempting this, I have here and there compared our idiosyncrasies and customs unfavourably with those of the people of other countries ; and I contend that you cannot invalidate the force of such comparisons by answering that others have failings on other sides that equalize, if they do not even reverse, the account. I maintain that many shortcomings of other communities are more or less inseparable from exceptionally unfavour- able conditions of life and unfortunate evolvements of history. It is true that the Conquest vitiated our Saxon element, and gave us a Norman landed feudality, under which, even down to the present hour, we groan. But we have long had the remedy to a great extent in our INTRODUCTION. xvii own hands. With a sea-board uninvaded for centuries, with an early emancipation from the trammels imposed upon thought by mediaeval Catholic intolerance, we might well expect to be free from many ills from which we suffer, without being cursed with any of those con- comitant disadvantages to which other communities still have to submit. We might expect this much, even if Englishmen were less sound of nerve and less full of energy than they undoubtedly are. And yet we are still blessed with feudal land laws; with a leasehold system such as no country in Europe would tolerate for a day, and with a cumbersome civil law founded on contradic- tions and precedents dating from the Conquest, which is the ridicule of all civilized countries. The governing executive is all but the monopoly of a privileged caste, and our administration tends to crush out talent instead of fostering and encouraging it. Our middle classes, in lieu of an honest loyalty, worship the aristocracy body and soul, without being able to assimilate any of the better qualities to which they profess to bow down in senseless and slavish adulation. Their ideas of respecta- bility lead them to treat poverty as worse than a mis- fortune, as a crime. And, lastly, we are blessed with the hideous outcome of all this in a hopeless and degraded proletariat. I do not contend that all this is traceable to our cant alone. I do hold, however, that a large amount of it xviii INTRODUCTION. undoubtedly is. Cant blinds us to things as they are, and thus performs the part of the vilest pair of blinkers that were ever clapped on the eyes of mortal bipeds.* These preliminary remarks I have judged necessary to back the contention. I hope to prove further on that, notwithstanding our boasted freedom and our ballot- boxes, we are still mentally enslaved far more than we are prepared to admit, and out of all proportion to the spirit of our written laws one-sided though these often are. We are swayed by shibboleths, from the power of which nothing but an entire revolution in our modes of thought and feeling can liberate us. I humbly submit that the sooner this revolution comes the better. Admit- ting that our civilization may be credited with its best product the "gentleman " and its complement the "lady," pity has made me not only feel that we may have paid too dear a price for the article, but also that there must be something even beyond and above our ruling-class product, namely a type that can no longer be satisfied with its own culture and refinement from the moment the conviction is gained, that this superiority is partly purchased at the price of an undue isolation of others and want of sympathy with them. Only when we have shaken off our cant, our Pharisaism, our gush, and other kindred concomitant nuisances, shall we really, as a nation, fulfil the glorious destiny * Carlyle's definition. INTRODUCTION. xix which foreigners who are only familiar with our best minds sometimes enviously feel to be our birthright. But before that comes to pass, a word will have to be spoken to a few elements which have contributed so much to vitiate our middle classes, to keep our masses in dark- ness, and which are mainly answerable for our unclean state. Foremost among these, from the past downwards, is the Established Church, with its preponderating worldly social position and its powerlessness to influence our uncultured masses, and the leviathan Metropolitan Press, with its commercial character and influence. These two things once set right, many others will right themselves, and find a healthier level. The people of this country will take care of that. For there are among us men Englishmen to the backbone who can even see beyond that definition the broader disc of humanity. ^ CONVENTIONAL CANT. CHAPTER I. PHARISAISM. "Woe unto you, Pharisees !" JESUS CHRIST. I. PHARISAISM is the essence of our individual and national self-sufficiency, and, blended with cant, goes to make up the full-bodied insular quality of the latter. Taken by itself, it shows some affinity to French Chauvinism, to German Philistinism, or, perhaps, to Slavonic aggressiveness. But the likeness is only a superficial one. Probed beneath the surface, Pharisaism is, after all, something different, something essentially middle-class English. We do not contend that it is con- fined to our middle classes ; but from them it takes its character, even when pandered to by the aristocracy or by the press. It is a speciality of conceit, of false pride ; B CONVENTIONAL CANT. but it is not like the harmless pride of the Spaniard, who is only afraid of his own redoubtable self in the looking- glass. It is the " toupet " of the fair-haired Anglo-Saxon race, more aggressive, if not more impertinent and vulgar, than that of any other people. That our press should continually presume to lecture foreign countries is, perhaps, not a striking feature. We too have been lectured by others in our turn. But in our attempts to " believe in " our Pharisaic estimate of ourselves we are unique. Of course there is no govern- ment like our Parliamentary system; no family-life like ours; and no cleanliness like that procurable by means of Pears's soap. Our cleanliness, moral and physical, is one of our noblest Pharisaic war-horses ! Some may believe it is an open question how far we are justified in riding it ; but as this is not a disquisition based on the statistics of soap consumption, we will not dwell further on the subject, save to remark that our constant asseverations of the importance we attach to cleanliness make us suspicious with regard to its too general pre- valence among us. Here, as elsewhere, it may sometimes be true " The lady protests too much methinks." Our press periodically congratulates the Crown Prince of Germany on having an English wife. We hardly know on what English blessing we should not be prepared to congratulate outsiders. It is not only with PHARISAISM. reference to our home life and its purity that we are enabled to feel a Pharisaic satisfaction in contemplating our less-favoured neighbours. Oh no ; all along the line, in every phase and walk of life, our Pharisaism enables us to attain that most desirable consummation a feeling of our own superiority. Our Pharisees have but to say a thing is English, and it is accepted by them as synonymous with being the right thing. They are presumably unaware that there may exist a feeling which has but to qualify a thing as English, as being synony- mous with wrong. One extreme is as absurd as the other ; but absurdity itself has ever been as characteristic of Pharisaism as its viciousness and its vulgarity. Notwithstanding all our Pharisaic missionary work, hardly an instance is on record of a high-caste Hindoo being converted to our creed. Still we send our mission- aries up into the hills and villages inhabited by races that detest us and despise our religion, or, at least, our mode of professing it and inculcating it Schopenhauer tells us : to those Indian children of nature our ideas of a supreme " Maker " only suggest the unethical con- ception of " Shoemaker," " Bootmaker," etc. ; an idea of le faiseur, der Macher, suggesting something to be got, to be gained, to be bartered, to be bargained for. That such is the case has not only been stated on foreign authority, but on the unimpeachable testimony of some of the most eminent Anglo-Indians, some of CONVENTIONAL CANT. whom have also enthusiastically given vent to their admiration for the spirit of the Buddhist creed. And yet we grind these Asiatic races to powder under our dominion,* literally crushing millions out of existence. But not only subject races feel the iron hand through the gaudy velvet glove ; our Pharisaism presses hard enough on our subject classes at home. II. That we should still persist in converting so-called "inferior" races is not a unique peculiarity of ours. Other Christian communities are still engaged in the same thankless work. But our attempts to convert races on an equal, if not on a superior, intellectual and moral level, mark a proud privilege which our Pharisaism confers on us almost solely. Have we not a Society for the propagation of the gospel among the Jews? And, if we are not misinformed, are not its offices in the centre of London itself? The muscular Anglo-Saxons endeavouring to convert the kinsmen of Spinoza and Heine ! If that be not delicious, those in quest of delight must be difficult to please. We cannot help recalling and putting on record here, for the delectation of those evangelical busybodies who * "Progress and Poverty," Henry George, p. 104. PHARISAISM. 5 devote their money to sending out unctuous incapables to distant parts to convert Jews, instead of devoting it to relieve the abject misery at their own doors, such as Judaism knows nothing of, the following memorable re- joinder which Moses Mendelssohn made to Herr Lavater and others, when in the spirit of their tribe they made their impertinent efforts to convert him : "Let me humbly request your advice in a given emergency, and one which is by no means impossible. Suppose that a fire should break out in my dwelling let the flames have already burnt out the ground floor, and that the foundations begin to shake would you have me fly for safety to the top story ? Can I reason- ably hope to find safety on the roof, if the lower part of the structure which supports it is already falling in? When you find a man of judgment hold opinions subver- sive of the Mosaic dispensation, does the question not occur to you, What will become of the Christian one, which is founded on it ? Of a truth, thou searcher after light and the right, were I not purely for the sake of light and the right inclined to expatiate somewhat further, I should here have closed my discourse, by showing you that your concluding wishes are in directest contradiction to the principles with which you set out." * But not only are the Jews the subject of our Pharisaic * Translated in "German Life and Literature." T. Fisher Unwin : London. CONVENTIONAL CANT. converting solicitude. The wave of hatred, or envy, for that indomitable and gifted race, which is at the present passing more or less over the whole continent of Europe, has supplied us with endless unction and food for self- satisfaction. When Jew-baiting in Germany first at- tracted attention, the Times treated us to one of its leaders on the subject. The alpha and omega of that article was to thank Heaven that we were not as others are. We need not refer to the comparatively recent time when the dislike of foreigners was almost as marked in England as any continental antipathy to the Jews is to-day; nor need we refer to our dislike of our Irish neighbours, when it used to be no unusual thing to see advertisements in the papers ending with the qualification that "no Irish need apply." Even without being con- versant with such facts, to anybody however superficially familiar with currents of continental social and political life, it must have been at least amusing to read a paper speaking in the name of England and accusing Germany of religious intolerance. Not that we would question the right of the Times to speak in the name of England. Did not even Mr. Henry Irving, only the other day, thank Americans in the name of England for his recep- tion among them? No, it is not the Jovine voice \ve object to, only the conclusions to which it gives expres- sion. Or, if we listen to it, why not urge it to continue its homily, and accuse the Americans of religious intoler- PHARISAISM. ance, because some Americans object to be undersold by Chinese labour ? Now, it is perfectly understood, on the other side of the Channel, that the Jews persistently represent every manifestation of enmity towards them as a display of religious intolerance ; whilst every dispassionate observer knows, that Jew-hatred is more or less the result of a race-hatred, all the fiercer because it is handed down to us by tradition, but otherwise similar to that shown in San Francisco towards the Chinese, in England formerly towards the Irish, and up to the present day in the colonies towards rival and inferior races. Of course that view of the question does not suit the Semitic element. It would immediately raise the collateral inquiry in how far the Jews had given cause for such hatred among a race which is the most tolerant in the world in religious matters ? It might involve the reply that the Jews have done a great deal to account for it, if only in creating envy by their extraordinary success in the battle of life, as it is waged in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Whether such hatred is morally justifiable is another matter. We are not concerned with the question of deserts, of reward and punishment. Such adjustments may be in their place in the nursery, or in the state penitentiaries, but they are entirely out of place in the consideration of race struggles and race predominance. One thing is certain : the Jews as a race CONVENTIONAL CANT, owe us Christians small thanks for anything ! But our Pharisee loves to think that everybody gets treated in this world according to his deserts, and hence it is concluded that the extraordinary blessings vouchsafed to us are only the results of our exceptional merits. The blessings of our bigotry, of our temperance crusade, of our salvation craze, the hideous immorality which stalks in broad daylight through our great towns and flourishes like disease in the vicinity of sewer gas, all these things are legitimate food for our Pharisee ! But he is accustomed to ignore the main issue of anything, if it prove inconvenient to his bumptious self-sufficiency ; and if he should come face to face with an awkward fact, so much the worse for the fact. III. We turn up the whites of our eyes when we see women working in the fields abroad, whilst we shut our eyes to the degradation of womanhood in each and all of our great manufacturing centres, not to mention London in particular. We pity the poor dogs we see harnessed to little carts on the continent, and cantingly make ourselves believe that our pity is a result of our sympathy with the faithful quadruped, instead of its being in reality nothing else than the result of a little bit of our aristocratic class legislation which objected to PHARISAISM. the quadrupeds reserved for the sports of our better classes being turned to menial occupations. Yes, our superior morality has ever been a favourite feeding- trough for the canting biped, and ridiculous enough it has made us appear from time to time. And yet our Pharisee aims high ; he has lofty ideals. And high aspirations are all very well; but, according to a Danish proverb, the jackdaw carries its dirty tail with it through the air, though it may attempt to soar to the clouds. If our Pharisee does not come up to the jackdaw in the altitude of its flight, he at least resembles it in the universality of his presence. We find him everywhere. In the church, he is to be expected in the pulpit, but we find him also invariably represented in the well-fed churchwarden, handing round the offertory plate after Sunday morning service. In our press, in the editorial "we," where he reflects the triumphant Civis Romanus sum. In reading the Times, who would ever imagine that there existed such a thing as a provincial press in this country, let alone a provincial public opinion ? Who would imagine that there exists a Scotch and an Irish press ; and who would believe that the reading public of the capital, with four millions of inhabi- tants, is almost ignorant of the tenor of the one and of the other ? And yet it is so, and that is by no means in itself the worst. The results of this Pharisaic narrowness of vision and thought are stumbling-blocks in the path CONVENTIONAL CANT. of all true progress. For we cannot assimilate tons of printed matter without being impregnated with its cha- racter. By being daily diluted with washy concoctions mixed in a vile Pharisaic crucible, not only our thinking powers become washy, but also those of our adminis- trators. The vagaries resulting therefrom have before now brought us within measurable distance of serious trouble, and often earned us as a nation the temporary ill-will, if not the contempt, of foreigners. And yet it has never been in the true interests of the masses of this country to caw and crow : it is only the trade of our Pharisees, and if it happens to represent bad trade, it is the masses that have to bear the loss. IV. Let those who take an interest in the backstairs, or rather in the undercurrents, of diplomacy refer to the correspondence of Queen Victoria and of Prince Albert with the King of Prussia, at the time of the Crimean war. Surely they will stand aghast at the monitory tone our royal couple adopted towards the sovereign of a friendly great power. Nothing but a Pharisaic conviction of our own lofty position could explain it, and if we refer to the Times of the period we have the explanation. The above-mentioned instance of Pharisaism becomes PHARISAISM. \ \ doubly interesting when we note the marked contrast of the position of Prussia then and now. For to-day the Times is able to discover, when the Prince of Wales is installed as a Prussian field-marshal, that it is an honour to England that the heir apparent is a Prussian officer. Tempora mutantur. But the Pharisee, unfortunately, changes little; he only changes his grazing ground, if we may be allowed to put him metaphorically on four legs. Another crass working of Pharisaism can be traced through our diplomacy during the Franco-German war. The whole tone of our action estranged us from both belligerents, but particularly from the Germans. That is not surprising, it is true, when we remember that that sinistre vieillard Lord Granville was entrusted with our foreign affairs. It was not very likely that the holder of the good office of the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, sauntering gaily along the Dover Marine Parade, with a flower in his buttonhole, as the mouthpiece of the mistress of the seas, would be listened to by two great nations engaged in a death struggle. Subsequent events have proved this. But such is Pharisaism ; it estranges even when it inanely means well. A Dutch friend of ours said he thought continental hatred of the English (which exists as a great reality) is very much due to the Times, which is so overbearing in teaching every 12 CONVENTIONAL CANT. foreign nation how to manage its own affairs, and assuming on all hands that what is English is best after the manner of some of the intolerable elderly English travellers one meets on every tour abroad. Our exposure of Pharisaism would be incomplete without reference to the supposed antagonism between Prince Bismarck and certain English statesmen Prince Bismarck, the earnest strong man after Carlyle's own heart, and our tricky, loquacious, Pharisaic after-dinner orators. Can a greater contrast be imagined ? It is true Prince Bismarck is said to be of an imperious nature, and British Pharisaism might well resent his name being introduced into a consideration of purely English virtue, if it were not that both parties in the state to conciliate him have lately taken such pains, as almost to warrant the mention of his name. Well, such as he is, he is not a likely man to fall in love with the average type of casuistic verbosity or verbose casuistry, that often does duty with us for statesmanship. The reasons for his supposed animosity must be sought deeper. They lie as close to Pharisaism as the apple lies to the tree. They spring unconsciously from the feelings of ill- concealed dislike half akin to contempt which a man, who has staked his existence and that of his sovereign and his people on the issue of battle, must feel for a plutocratic class, which for generations has only risked the life and substance of others, and always profited PHARISAISM. 13 and enriched itself by the process. That such a man as Prince Bismarck must feel more sympathy with an Austrian, French, or Russian ruling class, which, like his own, have in our time staked their existence, sword in hand, on the fall of the iron dice, is only to say that blood is thicker than water. But it is not only the want of a common blood-baptism that might account for the above-mentioned supposed antipathy of Prince Bismarck; it is the existence of the Pharisaic hauteur with which up till lately our leaders were in the habit of treating foreign authorities, political as well as social. Prince Bismarck, if not vindictive, has a splendid memory ; and his experiences in St. Petersburg, Frankfort, etc., could doubtless supply a key to much that we think inexplicable in him. Of course our canting press is ready to sneer at the mere thought of a man of Bismarck's eminence being swayed by personal motives ; but it is all the same safe to assume that they do not go for nothing when they happen to go hand in hand with the supposed interests of his policy. His is a towering and militant, not to say an aggressive, nature, but not a paltry mean one. In our discussions with him, when we found that the Pharisaic, civis-Romanus-sum attitude did not take, we jumped backwards and forwards catlike over the meaning of our own words, and ended by eating the leek, grinning and ejaculating, " Thanks so much," to the meal ! CONVENTIONAL CANT. But our Pharisees were none the worse for it ; it cost them none of their life's blood ; only a little of the self- respect they are ready to surrender to anybody who is strong enough to make them eat their own words. That a nature like Bismarck's should turn in disgust from such fighters who cannot fight and cannot grasp the hand of friendship is but natural. For our Pharisees grin again and tell us we want no allies, only the goodwill of all. You crocodiles ! Only the good- will of all, when we are about to crush a weak antagonist. And yet we had allies almost at all times, and quite lately did we not call the most transparent political sham of modern times our ally? Did not our press toady to him for nearly a generation ? And did we not find out overnight that we had our eggs in the wrong basket, and whilst we turned up our eyes in pious horror at the solid terms of the conqueror, thank heaven, that it was no business of ours, except, if possible, to profit by circumstances ? Yes, it is but too true that such was the attitude of our press (with few exceptions), and in accordance with it was the language of our Pharisees, who shame the arts of Machiavelli. Nor is it to be wondered at that, remem- bering it all, an antagonist should feel like calling out to us : " Come on, you rascals, draw your rat tail, and let me see whether I cannot make cat's-meat of you ! " PHARISAISM. 15 V. As we were not very grateful that Bismarck used his influence at the Congress of Berlin, 1878, in our favour, it is not surprising that we should have lately had a taste of what his indifference meant. And as there is no bully like our Pharisee, so there is also no grovelling cur like him, when his usually successful bounce is of no avail. Our Pharisees are the only ones in the world whose facial construction shows the prominent teeth aid- ing the graceless grin that accompanies the " Thank you " for the kick contemptuously applied. Luckily the Pharisees are not the true-hearted people of England, nor are their interests often our interests, and a kick or two applied to the former, whether by Prince Bismarck or anybody else, has in reality little to interest us, except to make us feel indignant that they should so often be in a position to compromise us in the eyes of the world. That they should ever again have the power to make us seriously responsible for their vagaries, is most unlikely. If we want allies, it is the intelligence of the country that will find them for us, not our daily press and its Pharisaic followers. Thackeray, during his lecturing tour in America, ob- served to an English officer * that it did an Englishman * " Canada and the Crimea," Major Ranken, R.E. Longmans, Green & Co. 1863. 16 CONVENTIONAL CANT. a great deal of good to travel in the United States, as it removed a little of his pride and self-sufficiency, etc. The days of the " Book of Snobs " and of " Vanity Fair " have long passed away, but little has changed of the malodorous self-sufficiency and the bumptious Pharisaism of large sections of our people. Luckily for the true interests of our race, the time is near at hand, if it has not already arrived, when the daily crowing and loud blustering of our glorious middle classes have be- come, if not innocuous, at least ridiculous. It is almost necessary to be placed far away, and only to come in contact with us now and then, in order to grasp the Pharisaic impertinence of a paper like the Times, to which we almost become insensible by reading it daily. The struggles and aspirations of other nations, their justification of self-defence, their moderation or want of moderation in the moment of victory, all are legitimate subjects for the final decision of the oracle of Printing House Square. Other mortals give an opinion on current events ; our Pharisee gives his moral verdict, his decision from which there is no appeal. Continental nations are told, in and out of season, to admire our laissez-faire principle of political and social development, our toleration of adulteration, and such like trifles, and are exhorted to behold the errors of their centralization and their bureaucracy. All this usually winds up with the Pharisaic hope that some day their PHARISAISM. 17 eyes may be opened to the glories of British Constitu- tionalism. Not that we are necessarily worse than others. We may, perhaps, on the whole, be a trifle better than many, but it is because we Pharisaically endeavour to appear so much better than we are, that we are so hated by others. If lately we have become more popular for instance in the United States it is mainly owing to the fact of our having, under the influence of our masses, dropped some of our Pharisaism, at least in our dealings with that quarter of the world. VI. Yes, there can be no doubt we have lately, now and then, shown some compunction in our behaviour, where we would formerly have never stopped to look to the right or to the left. There are signs abroad that we are no longer so cocksure of our own excellence in everything, as we used to be. Common-sense, towards which the Pharisee bears a mortal hatred, insists now and then on putting in his placid appearance, like Ban- quo's ghost, and, worse than it, asks pertinent ques- tions. If you glory in your successes, how about your responsibility for your failures ? If you possess the wealth of half the globe, how about the responsibility for the misery and degradation in your midst ? If your State- C 1 8 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Church and its figure-head is the Defender of the Faith, how about your Nonconformists, your Dissenters, your hundred and thirty religious sects, your latest craze the Salvation Army raging, seething in the masses of your religionless poor? And how about fifty other questions honest truth could put to you, and wait in vain for a reply ? How irrevocably Pharisaism is still mixed up in our very nature, we can judge for ourselves by noting the vulgar boasting which is the time-honoured tone at public dinners. " Our glorious navy," " our army," with which our commanders are prepared to do everything, except their quiet duty when combined with self-effacement, are lauded to the skies. Lord Wolseley has never known a bad naval officer, and presumably our admirals will give a similar testimony to our army. What must be the feelings'of the different illustrious personages presumably men with a keen sense of tact and modest good taste at having periodically to pander to Pharisaic instincts like these ! What must our vulgar Pharisaism be, when a man, in the position of Lord Salisbury, Prime Minister of Great Britain, does not hold it beneath his dignity to wind up the session of 1885 with a vainglorious, boasting speech about the unequalled qualities of the British army, such as an alderman might indulge in. Lord Derby is another representative public man, PHARISAISM. 19 whom the Times held up to us for many years as the coming light, which, however, did not prevent his political career from being a dismal failure. And yet we find this resident in a glass-house throwing Pharisaic stones, and telling us that the diplomacy of Europe is nothing but a sanguinary muddle ! This conscientious muddler beholds his own image daubed with blood in the diplomatists of Europe, Prince Bismarck, of course, among them. What perfect taste ! Fancy the flutter of our oracles if a foreign minister were to call out to us, " Hands off ! " How calculated is all this to gain us the goodwill of our neighbours ! But our Pharisee has never been afraid to tread on others' corns if he can score a wretched point by so doing ! Even a true-hearted man like the late Lord Shaftes- bury a man whose whole life was one continual benefit to others cannot escape the pestilential influence of our idiosyncrasies. Though he may rise superior to cant, he yet stumbles over the block of Pharisaism. For what is it but the pure unadulterated article, when we hear Lord Shaftesbury assuring his audience that no Church can boast such unselfish devotion of its members as ours ? Such boasting would be in questionable taste if it were founded on truth ; but it is far worse when it is a matter open to grave doubt. So much for the Pharisaism of some of our most eminent public men. CONVENTIONAL CANT. VII. In conclusion, let us give an instance in the domain of philosophy, usually held to be above local party or even national feeling and influences. Professor Henry Drum- mond's " Natural Law in the Spiritual World " has attracted attention, and been largely accepted as a wonderfully impartial and objective work on the subject indicated by the title. And yet, what do we find after wading through three hundred pages ? We come across the following crass instance of vulgar British Pharisaism: "Need we proceed to formulate objections to the parasitism of evangelicism ? Between it and the religion of the Church of Rome there is an affinity as real as it is unsuspected. For one thing, these religions are spiritually disastrous as well as theologically erroneous in propagating a false conception of Christianity." * Further on, the Catholic religion is described as a cheap religion, inevitably accompanied by a cheap life ! etc. This man feels himself qualified to hold the balance between science and the spiritual world, and yet he falls ignominiously foul of the Catholic Church, which he will not accept as a fair sample of the spiritual world. He meets every scientific reasoning that might tax the * Henry Drummond, "Natural Law in the Spiritual World," P- 534> Semi- Parasitism. PHARISAISM. strength of religious belief with the words, " Christ is life;" and yet gives us to understand that the sole representative Church of Christ, for sixteen centuries, was a cheap one ; is a religion " as spiritually disastrous as it is theologically erroneous ! " Surely this utterance does not possess even the elements of religious tolerance of the humblest Freemason. And yet Mr. Drummond is the fashion. Pious ladies, Bible in hand, flock to hear him wed evangelical theology to Darwinism in his own peculiar way. His book is a very clever attempt to make analogy do the work of argument ; and, great as its success has been in a publisher's point of view, it is not in originality or in power such as could excuse, not to say justify, such Pharisaism. Oh, most foul Pharisaism, even now that at home an obscure Irish country gentleman is making Parliamentary Government a farce, your Times daily dares to indulge in hortative, admonitory sermons to the French on their own business that of expelling the Orleans princes instead of covering your face with your hands, and only withdrawing them in order to attend to your own affairs. Such is one of the qualities that cause us to be disliked where without them we might fairly claim our share of sympathy, goodwill, and esteem. The direct injury it inflicts on ourselves we will endeavour to show further on in dealing with its sister quality, cant. CHAPTER II. CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. " Cant is organized hypocrisy." CARLYLE. I. PHARISAISM is hardly an amiable quality, but in cant we have the real thing, the Apollyon of Revelation, the arch insular speciality among our idiosyncrasies. Our bigotry and our drunkenness are in truth widespread, but they are, after all, only sporadic compared with cant ; which, directly or indirectly, is allied to almost every form of our selfishness and vice. Growing up, as we do, under the contradictory influences of thoughts instilled into us from early youth, and referring to the difficulty attending the salvation of the rich, and yet beholding all the world most eager to become rich, it is no wonder that hypocrisy need not be specially created ; it comes to us with our mother's milk. It is not that we lie straightforwardly; we are too long-headed for such a transparently losing game, and CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. 23 prefer leaving it to the weaker-gritted Latin race. We circumvent, we elude truth. We do not hide our heads like the ostrich, which, on the approach of an enemy, fancies it has hidden its whole carcase too; we simply ignore and avoid the enemy truth. For instance, when we cant about the loyalty of our colonies, we smile away the fact that the Dominion taxes our produce as im- partially as that of other countries. When we repro- duce foreign public opinion that is favourable to our momentary political current, we quietly ignore much bigger volumes of similar foreign expressions of opinion that tell the other way. Gambetta cried out, " Le clericalisme, voila 1'ennemi!" Our privileged classes, in heaping every opprobrium on a leading statesman, plainly say, " Voila notre ennemi ! " And an unbiased Englishman, wishing to see his countrymen a little better than they are, even though it be vain to hope they may become as perfect as they wish to appear, might boldly call out, " Cant, thou art our curse ! " For there is hardly any of our idiosyncrasies that do not show a trace of it, as sulphur shows itself invariably in silver mines. Such being the case, we owe it a few words of elucidation as to character and origin, whilst reserving a fuller explanation to be evolved from detailed instances of its working in our midst An introduction to cant is like an introduction to the head of a family : it precedes, if it does not include, the 24 CONVENTIONAL CANT. acquaintance of its minor members ; thus when we know cant, we are soon on nodding terms with most of our insular idiosyncrasies. II. Now, let us *ask ourselves what is this influential quality ? What does it consist of? And lastly, how did it originate, how and where does it flourish? It is a glittering weapon in the armoury of hell, though it is by no means identical with the conventional lies of modern society in general ; it has only identified itself with a few of them. Nor is it at all to be mistaken for the hypocrisy of any religious creed. Cant is essentially English, and more especially Protestant English, although totally dis- connected from any dogma or formula of belief. It may be defined as a "sly affectation" of superiority of morality which, by long practice, has become an affecta- tion of every form of conventional excellence. Whereas Pharisaism might be termed a "bumptious conscious- ness " of our own superiority. The latter is pernicious enough, as we have endeavoured to show in the pre- ceding chapter; but cant holds the palm. Pharisaism is invariably allied to stupidity, against which, as Schiller neatly says, even the gods fight in vain. Cant is the result of a mental reservation like unto hypocrisy, and it vitiates the character almost as much as the honest square lie ! It destroys the love of truth, CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. . 25 perhaps unconsciously, at its very roots ; it makes us gradually incapable of seeing anything but ourselves and our o\vn material interests, and even these in their meanest aspects. It so successfully shuts out the light of day from us, that we gradually come to prefer the noxious darkness it creates. In his " Life of Carlyle," Mr. Froude renders the senti- ments of the latter on this very subject as follows : " At the bottom of his whole nature lay abhorrence of falsehood. To see facts as they actually were, and, if that was impossible, at least to desire to see them ; to be sincere with his own soul, and to speak to others exactly what he himself believed, was to him the highest of all human duties. Therefore he detested cant with a perfect hatred. " Cant was organized hypocrisy, the art of making things seem what they were not ; an art so deadly that it killed the very souls of those who practised it, carrying them beyond the stage of conscious falsehood into a belief in their own illusions, and reducing them to the wretchedest of possible conditions that of being sincerely insincere. With cant of this kind he saw all Europe, all America overrun ; but, beyond all, his own England appeared to him to be drenched in cant cant religious, cant political, cant moral, cant artistic, cant everywhere and in everything." The middle classes, under the guidance and earnest 26 CONVENTIONAL CANT. co-operation of the clergy, have brought this vicious idiosyncrasy oftenest met with in its social disguise of "respectability" into such universal acceptation and practice, that the aristocracy pay tribute to it, whilst the poor invariably suffer by it. For it is largely answerable for our want of true sympathy with those less fortunate than ourselves, whether as classes or as individuals, and it has branded poverty as worse than a misfortune, as a crime. Its practice has erected a barrier round our poorer classes, which has become one of the causes of their hopeless isolation and consequent despairing brutality, ignorance, and drunkenness. Now, let us ask ourselves what exceptional circum- stances are answerable for this unique product ? Can it be our insular position ? No other islands are infected with it, not even Catholic Ireland. Our insular position and consequent freedom from foreign aggression may, at most, be the cause that cant has never yet been thrashed out of us, but it is not the cause of its origin. III. Can it be our form of government ? Similar forms of government know it not. Besides, as Pope truly has it " For forms of government let fools contest ; Whate'er is best administered is best." CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. 27 Thus any well-administered form of government of any description, would be unlikely to assist in the cultivation of such a noxious quality. Can it be ingrained in the character of the race ? It is true the Anglo-Saxon element is a good one to encourage its growth : for up to the present day the Saxons are under the faint suspicion of that social and political deceit which is so nearly related to cant ; and the old German proverb still has it, " Sachs und Bohm trau schau wem ? " (Anglice, Saxon or Bohemian, which are you to trust ?) And if we look back to the distant past, we find in our history record of several splendid in- stances of hypocrisy, very difficult to distinguish from the quality of which we are now treating. Richard III.'s anxiety for the welfare of his nephews is a striking instance in point. The incident of Richard III. accusing Lord Hastings of witchcraft, and his swift decapitation, are also most instructive. Following the line of our rulers, we find in good Queen Bess and her tender regrets over the execution of Mary Queen of Scots another salient feature of early budding cant ! Almost equally interesting as instances of freedom from cant are the first two George's, both of whom took little trouble to disguise their hatred of England. But predisposition of race alone must not be taken for the sole cause of such an abundant crop of our full- blown cant of to-day. We have instances of sections of 28 CONVENTIONAL CANT. our race, living under changed conditions, who are comparatively free from it. If this be so, then the " conditions " of our existence must account for it ! Therein we must seek the explanation, and ask in how far are the conditions changed that free us from cant ? First of all, we must rank the emancipation from the artificial restrictions imposed on our daily life by our slavery to our special forms of its conventionality, and what we term respectability ; emancipation from the social influence of our Established Church and its ruling class bias and tendency. We can prove this best by noting that even in our midst, in the very cauldron of cant, these elements that are untouched by our Church influence the humbler classes have no cant. They may have hysteria, brutality, and drunken savagery, but they have no cant ! They may offend every esthetic feeling man is capable of, but they do not cant ! IV. Our social cant is a distinct product, as compared with the religious hypocrisy of other communities. The social cant which our Established Church has during generations filtered into our very being is still omnipo- tent, now that doctrinary influence is struggling in the epileptic fits of senility. Let us hold to the contention that our cant is the CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. 29 outcome of the worldly form of our Protestant State Church, and endeavour to prove it. Professor Johannes Scherr, the German historian, says of the origin of our Anglican Church, " A product of the adulterous frenzy of Henry VIII. , it has never been able to efface the traces of its unclean origin." When our executive, headed by his most gracious majesty King Henry VIII., seceded from the Church of Rome, and marked England as the champion of Protestantism by Act of Parliament, it cut the com- munity adrift from an iron hierarchy, swayed and directed in the interests of a creed largely based on the feelings and the imagination, and appealing to them. We phari- saically adopted a superior article a ruling-class edition of our own, which discarded almost all that constitutes the vitality of the Catholic Church. We undoubtedly cast off its abuses as well, many of which, however, were temporary, whereas we took over in our new creed dogma left entirely out of consideration worldly vices that have adhered to us, like the shirt of Nessus, until the present day. Henry VIII. in robbing the Church, also robbed the poor, to whom one-third of Church property was assigned and devoted. For the oldest laws, the canons of Egbert (A.D. 750), lay it down that one part of the revenue of the Church be spent in ornamenting the church, one part be applied to the use of the poor, and one part to the use of the priests themselves. 30 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Unlike the Protestants of other countries, we retained the outward character of the Catholic system ; that is to say, we retained, above everything else, the powerful hierarchy of the Catholic Church. No longer powerful in matters of dogma and policy versus the State, our ecclesiastics, now that they were allowed to marry and found a family, became the social power they are even up to the present day. Preferment became a social lever for the benefit of the younger sons of the upper classes, instead of a political one, and the appointments being almost exclu- sively in the hands of the Crown and the great land- owners, were distributed in their interests exclusively. Instead of working, as hitherto, in the interests of the vicar of St. Peter, our princes of the Church, in harmony with the classes they sprang from, directed their influence towards consolidating the worldly position of their caste, and of that of their families and relations. Their activity has become the motive power of the whole Anglican clergy down to the humblest curate who hopes for an incumbency; and this has continued, with one memorable interruption an interruption memorable from its absence of worldly cant from the time of Henry VIII. down to the present day. Being allowed to marry, the activity of the Anglican clergy has ever since been divided between their profession and care for their family. Not that it is the family tie by itself CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. 31 that need have acted in the spirit indicated, for all Protestant clergymen of other denominations marry without marriage interfering with their spiritual vocation. But the Church of England, being essentially aristocratic, the addition of the family tie intensified a direction already prescribed. It strengthened the foundation of a powerful clerical oligarchy, which has ever since been intent, not only on maintaining the worldly interests of its profession, but on furthering the worldly position of its offspring and connections. Forced by the strongest of instincts, that of self-preservation, to look upward to the fountain of worldly grace, it is not to be wondered at, that one of the first results was an estrangement from the humble classes, which was intensified by the fact, that our clergymen were never, as in other countries, drawn from all classes alike, but only from the higher and upper middle classes. To be a gentleman first, and the shepherd of a flock only afterwards, has ever been the aim of our clergy, a gentleman with all the narrowness that the term often implies, where a regard for the wants and feelings of others is unknown. V. Herein we note a marked difference between our priesthood and that of the Roman Catholic Church, which is drawn equally from all classes. There we 32 CONVENTIONAL CANT. see the descendant of Crusaders working among the poor on an equality with the peasant's son. There we see this equality carried out even in the placing of the congregation of their churches ; where the poor kneel down beside the rich, the only division being the sex. Hence, partly, the gigantic influence we behold, even to this day, in the hands of the Catholic priesthood over the humble classes. They feel with each other. Our Protes- tant priesthood as a class, whatever brilliant exceptions there may have been, never have done so from the first ! It is this looking up socially of our clergy, and the fact of its having had the education of our youth solely in its hands for generations, and thus inoculating the young of three centuries with the instincts to which it owed its own advancement, that has mainly produced that lying reptile our English respectable conventional cant. It has laid the foundation of that toadying debasement before rank and social power which has ever remained one of the greatest blemishes of the English race. It has been fostered at our public schools, where to be gentleman first and to learn something afterwards has been the watchword for generations. Not only that, but the definition of the word " gentle- man " has been exclusively in the hands of a body of men, the chief of whom the head-master invariably makes ^6000 to ^8000 a year for inculcating it ! We do not intend to enlarge at present on the world- CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. 33- wide results of our clerical social influences, but merely to point out their being, among other things, the main source of our conventional cant. The advertisements of advowsons and next presenta- tions week by week in the most able and respectable Guardian, are bad enough ; but that is an evil which, though inveterate, is above-board, .and is likely before long to be modified in important particulars ; though the bishops, with their extreme respect for property in any form, are inclined to treat it gingerly enough. We do not here take note of the exchanges of livings, quietly effected in a college room or in a back parlour in after- dinner talk, " across the walnuts and the wine," as the laureate says, with sometimes, at all events, too little con- sideration for the wants or feelings of the poor denizens, it may be, of two remote parishes. No wonder the Church fails to reach the poorer classes ; that our rectories and our vicarages are really centres of cant, and that our peasants are simply sheep to be shorn. They bow to the vicarage people as they pass, but they wink to each other at the same time, and as the vicar goes " bummin' awaay," they lounge and talk at the corners of the village till the " public-house " opens, where they really do hear something that bears on fact and life. These influences have now been at work for over three hundred years, and have permeated the com- munity from the four points of the compass and down D 34 CONVENTIONAL CANT. into the humble classes, who have remained untouched alike by spiritual and by canting influences, having had nothing to gain by the one, nor to lose by the other. They have even penetrated these elements which repre- sented a conscientious religious conviction, namely the followers of Wesley and the numerous dissenting bodies in this country. What would not yield to spiritual persuasion has, through the influence of countless generations of worldly social conditions, yielded in- directly to the promptings of self-interest. Cant has vitiated our very instincts ; and it would be an interesting problem, whether it has not left its mark even on our cast of features. It is still an open question whether the physiognomists of the future will not, by following out the theory that the bent of our minds impresses itself on our faces, arrive at the conclusion, that the peculiar construction of the mouth the dial of our moral character which so largely characterizes the English race, cannot be traced to a suspicion of cant in our moral character. How largely it enters into our very train of thought may be seen in the legal fiction, that nothing can undo the finding of twelve English jurymen. If a man be innocently condemned to penal servitude, he can only be pardoned, not reinstated and indemnified for his sufferings. The law of our country is infallible, or rather its interpreters, even if they strike the law of logic full in the face. CANT DEFINED AND TRACED. 35 To point to trifling straws that suffice to show the way the wind has long blown, we may observe, that our very language shows unmistakable signs of cant grafted on it. We term a class of men " Licensed Victuallers," who are not licensed to sell victuals at all, and, in fact, rarely do so. They are licensed to sell alcoholic drinks, and are allowed to adulterate even these. The very term contains a canting lie, by which common use and consent now designates a body of men who before now have decided the fate of a ministry ! In our hotels we style the dining-room the " coffee- room ; " coffee fit to drink being about the last thing you can procure in any one of them from Land's End to John o' Groats. CHAPTER III. SOCIAL CANT. " Why should I want to get into the middle classes because I have some learning ? The most of the middle classes are as ignorant as the working people about everything that does not belong to their own Brummagem life. That's how the working men are left to foolish devices and keep worsening themselves : the best heads among them forsake their boon comrades, and go in for a house with a high door-step and a brass knocker." GEORGE ELIOT (Felix Holt}. I. THAT want of honest pride in their position, the only justifiable class pride, is not confined to the humble orders, but is typical of the whole community. George Eliot compares this condition of things to the wriggling of eels in a jar, each restlessly endeavouring to get uppermost. The middle classes provide the worst types of these wriggling eels. As, in endeavouring to lift our- selves socially, not intellectually, above our fellows, there is no more effective assistance to us than the constant striving to make ourselves and others believe we are in SOCIAL CANT. 37 every way more than we really are, so by this one cause alone a certain amount of social cant becomes innate in most of us. And this it is that gives such a tinge of unreality to our whole existence, its occupations and pleasures. Our servants are only happy when they don the silks or broadcloth of their so-called betters. The same applies to our artisans, and holds good through the humble classes. Our middle classes use their best endeavours to make us believe they have some connect- ing link with their social superiors, and invariably make themselves unhappy, if not miserable, by doing so. And yet there is no place like home, for the rich say so and the poor mouth it over after them ; so there is no home- life like that of our chosen people, who debar us from marrying our deceased wife's sister. Even the Duke of Argyll tells us, "if people of this country were once allowed to marry their deceased wife's sister, year after year we should sink to a lower depth on this subject of marriage." This either means, in our cant phraseology, that we should sink to the depth of our own colonies and other nations that sanction marriage with a deceased wife's sister, or it means nothing ! What would then become of the sanctity of our English home, and what would become of that beautiful relationship of a man towards his wife's sister? that ideal conjunction of Platonic friendship and brotherly confidence, only attain- able in our favoured isles, where the sister can remain 38 CONVENTIONAL CANT. under the roof of her bereaved brother-in-law and comfort him and care for his children without the foul breath of scandal touching her or him? And yet the analyst of cant might venture to point out, as was done in a leading journal lately, if the above be honest truth and not one of our canting lies, how comes it that a widower could most certainly not travel about with his deceased wife's sister without scandal? But our conventional morality is not made for travelling consumption ; it is for home use; and in our homes it is that we are seen at our greatest advantage. This brings us, by a natural associa- tion of ideas, to a passing glance at their arrangements ; and in scarcely anything is our engrained tendency to cant more evident than here. II. Enter the houses of the wealthy or the great who keep a luxurious staff of servants unknown elsewhere. You meet scrupulous cleanliness and brightness notwithstand- ing the overloaded heavy character of the furniture. A continual warfare seems to be kept up by the domestics against the depressive influence of small rooms, dark curtains, sombre carpets, elephantine furniture, and heavy ornaments ; constantly brightening, varnishing, dusting, shaking, and cleaning. That is called "comfort!" home comfort ! The middle classes must also have their walls SOCIAL CANT. 39 crowded with pictures (invariably bad ones), or cheap prints. They must also have heavy curtains, thick dust- retaining carpets : in fact, all in imitation of their betters that their means can run to. Only they generally lack the service and discrimination that are necessary to have their ponderous emblems of home comfort properly kept As the neatness, etc., make us overlook the tasteless interior of the rich man's houses, so the want of them makes us abhor the interior of the middle-class houses. At the same time it is only fair to add that the last ten years have wrought a great change in the arrangement of the houses of the rich : the same can hardly in any way be said of the lower middle classes ; perhaps it will come. As for cleanliness, in its wider and truer sense, being a national virtue, some have been bold enough to declare it a fond delusion, which can be excused in a devoted patriot, but which betrays a serious want of judgment in an observant cosmopolitan. In most countries we find cleanliness go hand in hand with wealth, and the want of it go hand in hand with poverty ; except in Holland, where cleanliness seems almost universal. England is in this respect as unlike Holland as any other country is unlike it. The conditions of private life, let alone of climate, are uncongenial to cleanliness, or rather, make cleanliness more difficult of attainment than elsewhere. First of all, the lower classes, unlike those of other countries, have no distinctive garb of their own, but 40 CONVENTIONAL CANT. vainly endeavour to copy their superiors (or betters) in dress. By this it is meant that small tradesmen, me- chanics, domestics of both sexes, ape the cloth and silks of their betters, but omit to don the fine clean linen, etc., of the well-to-do-classes : neither can they devote the care and time to the unseen details of adornment that go to make a man or woman look tidy. The conse- quence is that, among the above-mentioned classes, we see untidy sluts, such as you can but rarely find else- where, among women. A great Russian lady once told us, our country life, our castles, were superb, the like of them nowhere ; but she had never been able to forget the hopeless degrada- tion of our poor, the like of which she had also never witnessed. And yet students of Shakespeare will find there was once a humble class country life in England, as there is still to be found in other countries, where the small land cultivator, represented by our extinct yeoman, still exists. But our social and land system have swept away all that for us. Pass through some of the loveliest agricultural and scenic districts of Eng- land, and you will see the mansions of the rich, their orchards and gardens peeping out from behind clustering trees, or over dead brick walls surmounted with glass bottles. Everywhere you will find the rights of property strictly safeguarded. Boards and notices meet your eye at every turn : " Trespassers beware," " Trespassers will SOCIAL CANT. 4 i be prosecuted according to the law," etc. ; and in sight of it all. skulks the country serf, as degraded as any Russian serf, and far more hopelessly forlorn ! III. A mild form of social cant, which has come down to us from former times when it was strong, is the tiresome habit of our public men interlarding their speeches with Latin and Greek quotations. One might almost fancy it were necessary, in order to be able to understand the aspirations of the English people, to know first by heart your Juvenal, Horace, and Homer, although the intellects of ancient Greeks and Romans, and consequently their literatures, had, in reality, far less in common with our present wants and sympathies, than other literatures more nearly related to us by ties of race and time. The key to our inconsistency is easy to find. Seek it in cant, and you have it. These interlarded Latin and Greek quotations are not meant for popular consumption ; they are merely canting clap-trap, recalling references to the social position of the speakers and their hearers. But just as at Eton, to be a gentleman first, and then to learn a little Greek and Latin is the curriculum, or the role ; so it may shrewdly be suspected that those who quote most Greek and Latin often know least of these litera- tures, and indulge in the habit as a gentlemanly exercise, 42 CONVENTIONAL CANT. believing with the poet that more attention will be paid " To him who can express No sense at all in several languages," than to him who can discourse like a Solon in his own. It is a well-understood fiction that only the gentle- born are familiar with Greek and Latin, and only they are capable of sympathizing with the man who fondly fancies himself addressing the Roman Senate ; whereas he is generally addressing an assembly of drowsy, post- prandial English common-place beings, who do not so much want to understand, as to be understood in their sham social pretensions, and treated accordingly. Fortunately, at a recent (1883) Lord Mayor's dinner, the Lord Mayor evidently with the intention of show- ing the common-place vulgarity of the practice, and prob- ably to the dismay of the party assembled led off with a Greek and a Latin quotation one after the other ! It is too much to hope that this ludicrous incident may act as an immediate deterrent to others. Still, the example of Lord Mayor Fowler may ultimately have excellent results in leading some hardened classical pla- giarists to restrict these " lardings," if not in the name of common sense, then at least for fear of ridicule. We feel all the more justified to hope that such may be the case, when we bear in mind that, forty years ago, the fatal duel of two drapers' assistants hailing from the SOCIAL CANT. 43 Tottenham-court-road cast ridicule on duelling, and thus disgusted our gentry with its practice. It could no longer be considered a social distinction to be drilled at fifteen paces by the bullet of a Joe Manton's smooth- bore, if it could be done equally well in humble life by a pair of rusty horse-pistols. The splendid literature of Shakespeare's mother-country contains sufficient thoughts to borrow and to quote from, without con- tinually going to the Latins and Greeks. And if it should be necessary to quote German or French in the future, perhaps by that time we shall have disestablished our mouthing classical dons, and introduced the cultiva- tion of modern languages, not as a superfluous luxury, but as an intellectual necessity. If Mr. Gladstone, with his enormous capacity for learning, knew less of the subtleties of his beloved Latin and Greek authors, and had grasped a little more of the heart and soul of Teuton culture, to be found in the pages of Lessing and Goethe, he would have indulged in fewer dreams about the future of the Latin and other races, and saved himself from many disenchantments, and many political inconsistencies and discomfitures. But the history of our idiosyncrasies would have been the poorer if it could not point to the patron of the English High-Church party peacefully babbling about ideal government with M. Clemenceau. Such are the results of a one-sided culture allied to a dreamy, ideal, and mercurial temperament 44 CONVENTIONAL CANT. the whole based on a Herculean Scotch frame and in- tellect. The truth is, our masters at Eton and Harrow, and even our very learned professors at Oxford and Cam- bridge, need to devote a good deal more attention to their mother-English, even if they give a little less to Latin and Greek. Mr. Washington Moon has taken the translators of the Revised Version smartly to task for their bad English, and has got a good laugh out of them, too; and the impeccable Mr. Matthew Arnold, whose style is so vaunted, is shown to blunder helplessly over his pronouns, to tie singular nouns to plural possessive pronouns, and to deal in a very free and easy manner with adverbial forms and the " to " of the infinitive, in an article in the April number of the British and Foreign Evangelical Review, and in a manner which makes us feel that a good deal of his conceit might even have been thrashed out of him at school by a thoroughly good teacher. But the cant of criticism must have its way, and Mr. Arnold is a wonderful stylist ! IV. Whenever a new scandal is brought to light in other countries, that most canting of emblematical beasts, the British Lion, treats us to his Pharisaic growl. But how qualified his attitude when the unsavoury matter exhales SOCIAL CANT. 45 its poisonous gases nearer home ; for, in common fair- ness, it must be admitted that cant and Pharisaism have had rather a bad time of it of late. Literary memoirs are of intense interest to gauge cant in society and in politics. Cant does not like the secrets of the grave made public, and hence the howl of indignation of press and society every time a new revelation shows us that our Jupiter Ammon is stuffed with sawdust. Hardly had society got over the disagreeable impression of the Greville memoirs, in which we were reminded that we were only quite recently reigned over by a blockhead (and before him by a vile debauchee), when the biography of Samuel Wilberforce and the letters of Mr. and Mrs. Carlyle, saw the light of day. And what a revelation the above proved to the howling well-dressed multitude ! What a universal outcry against the abuse of lifting the veil from the personal life of deceased eminent men ! What unpardonable indiscretion on the part of Mr. Reginald Wilberforce in one case, and of Mr. Froude in another ! They are accused of disregard for the fitness of things, want of tact, heartlessness. In short, what social law had they not transgressed ? What man of mark would ever care to face the ordeal of death in future, if his posthumous fame was thus to be dealt with ? Who would be safe if such laying bare of the arteries of the mind of greatness is to be indulged in ? Very dreadful, and very shocking to be sure, we may say ; and yet, 46 CONVENTIONAL CANT. it is possible for some men to hold back and be of opinion that Mr. Wilberforce and Mr. Froude were justified in the course they thought fit to take. To be of that opinion, it is but necessary to disconnect our minds from the parrot-like twaddle of the educated multitude, and calmly and disinterestedly to ask our- selves, Whence these tears? Are the canting many- headed really so anxious to have nobody's feelings hurt, and their idols left unstained and unblemished? or is all this hubbub nothing else than the disgust of society at being caught in the act of bowing down to men who, with all their brilliant gifts, could hardly be said to adorn the doctrine they professed ? As for the Carlyle letters, they surely do not impeach the truth of a single line of Carlyle's teachings. But what they did most forcibly, besides showing his human frailty, at which only cant could be surprised, was to show the severe, and unmercifully small, opinion Carlyle held of many who had come in contact with him during a long life, mostly passed in ill-health and bitterness of spirit. Cant would have soon forgotten any individual injustice Carlyle may have been guilty of, had it not been impossible to do so without his small opinion of them being disclosed, and his contemptuous estimate of many being brought home to them. They could not, in a word, help any longer reflecting from their idols to themselves. Cant alone, therefore, must be the SOCIAL CANT. 47 reason we should feign surprise at his human imper- fection. V. The upper middle class in England is continually exclaiming against the rottenness of ideal sentimentalism, of whatever description. Yet no class is more ready to encourage the growth of noxious sentiment when it suits its purpose. Is not the aristocratic narrow character of our public-school curriculum largely a matter of un- healthy sentiment; and do not our toadying upper middle classes bow down to it and worship it? The abstract and speculative sciences are cold-shouldered for the full glory of classic belles-lettres. Technical science, involving a possible soiling of the hands, comes in still later. As for modern languages, why, up till quite lately, they were the monopoly of the respective foreign masters, the pupils remaining innocent of them. Is not sentiment mainly at the bottom of all this ? And what sentiment ? Why, principally the aristocratic class sentiment of our clergy, which unfortunately is still so largely answerable for the education of our youth. If it be not a matter of vulgar class sentiment, why do not the middle classes send their children to learn the curriculum and the languages that are necessary to enable them to fight the battle of life and compete better with the foreign elements that come over here and take the bread out of 48 CONVENTIONAL CANT. their mouths, instead of socially sneaking, toadying, and fawning in the endeavour to find favoured appointments for their offspring ? " gentlemanly occupations ! " Why do they send their sons to the colonies to be cattle drivers ? Because they are ashamed of seeing them in counting-houses in the land of their birth, and thus prefer to let German Jews, Greeks, Armenians, and others gradually oust the native element from the city and the great provincial commercial houses. Surely the race that is hard enough to fight as Englishmen can fight, would, if washed clean of cant and class vulgarity, and under fair conditions, hold its own against foreign Jews, Germans, or Armenians. But social interest stops short at the "gentleman," as also does ruling class intelligence. Beyond that it sees green, yellow, or any but the true colour. Only lately a General Feilding wrote an article in the Nineteenth Century, endeavouring to answer the question, What are we to do with our sons? with the usual fighting shy of the realities of the question. But our daily press finds it a most sensible article, and cant- ingly adds : " If they (our sons) will but remember that honest work always ennobles and can never degrade," etc. Delightful ! We do not want you to tell us such a platitude as that work can never degrade, but we know that were it possible you would have rendered it so. For yours are the instincts that pooh-pooh the novels of Dickens, not SOCIAL CANT. 49 for their exaggerated idealism, but because you dislike to see the poor, the humble, and the lowly made the subjects of this idealism. Yours are the instincts that make you prefer the novels of Thackeray, not for their literary excellence, but because his heroes are mostly taken from your own class. For with all your apprecia- tion of him as a novelist, you conveniently forget that as a satirist he was greater still, and that he vented his satire on your class exclusively. But we can produce " gentlemen " who will not only blandly tell you that they have neither read Dickens nor Thackeray, nay, that they have not even read Shakespeare and Carlyle. They will harmlessly assume that others may have thought fit to do so, but they are satisfied with being conscious of gen- tility. In their efforts to be gentlemen, many do not seem to see that the greatest vulgarity is ignorance, particularly when coupled with bumptious self-sufficiency ; and that it is as impossible to be a gentleman without being free from cant and class prejudice, as it is im- possible to make a sweet omelette with rotten eggs. And that class prejudice is instilled into us as soon as we are able to walk. The sense of our superiority to those in humbler stations and our longing to come near to those above us are fostered from our earliest days. The country squire's children are taken by the nurse to play in the grounds surrounding the Manor House and shut off from the country roads by gates and walls. 50 CONVENTIONAL CANT. We ourselves have lived in a sweet rural retreat, not a hundred miles from London, where the worthy vicar (now dead) did not allow his children to speak their own tongue, but kept them, even when big boys, under a French bonne, lest they should interchange ideas with the children of the village not to say play with them even the all-uniting harmless English game of cricket ! Exclusiveness in its meanest sense is bred in us. The poor may peep in through the gates or through the crevices of walls and boards, but a barrier is between them, unknown among their like elsewhere. Even in London, which is supposed to level us all, the children of the well-to-do middle classes are taken to the enclosed squares open only to their inhabitants. It may be unavoidable, but we find such things only among us. Thus our youths before they enter their teens are made to feel a certain class superiority. Naturally, those who live in less fortunate circumstances try to procure for their children the privileges that have been beyond their own reach. This is one of the causes of our restlessness, which bids us seek our happiness in striving for that which, when attained, is found to be scarcely worth the having. vi: Our provincial press, which, as we have seen, is usually treated by the metropolitan press as non-existent, SOCIAL CANT. 51 has lately been beforehand in gauging many signs of the times. Recently a Manchester paper brought out a series of articles treating of the superior technical education that the sons of the German middle and humble classes enjoy, and the advantages thus derived by the country in all departments of manufacture and general industry. Why are our hotels admittedly so bad ? Why are the best hotels in London and in the provinces managed and waitered by foreigners ? Because when an English- man has made a little money he is ashamed of being an hotel-keeper. His children cannot play in the square ; he must send them to a fashionable school to mix with their betters, and rise above their station. A German or Swiss hotel-keeper sends his sons, after they have had a better education than the average Eton boy, to foreign countries to serve as waiters, so that when they return home they can take over the business of their father with a thorough knowledge of its requirements. Thus they rise in prosperity, and when a war breaks out neither their prosperity nor their training prevents them from doing their duty in the ranks, or as officers in the army. And we cannot help thinking that one of the reasons our pastry-cooks seem incapable of improving the cha- racter of their indigestible wares is to be found in the circumstance that, in the second generation, they will not 52 CONVENTIONAL CANT. seek the field of their ambition in the improvement of their products. The American ambassador in Berlin (Mr. White), in his observations on German affairs, drew attention to this very point, noting the splendid opportunities offered in Germany for technical education to all, even down to the humblest class. We have copied our School- Boards from the Germans; our competitive examina- tions ; and perhaps before long we shall, in our own crazy way, take a leaf out of their book in regard to technical education. But up to the present we find apparent throughout our whole educational system the most disastrous play of social class cant. As a straw will suffice to show the direction of the wind, so a very trifling matter becomes valuable as an indication of our mental subserviency to a class. For instance, the accepted mode of pronounc- ing certain aristocratic family names. It is almost in- conceivable that in an age that lives on at such a pace absolutely forgetting on the morrow what occupied all its thoughts to-day that in such an age a ruling class should have the audacity to expect us to pronounce some of its family names according to its own wayward taste. That a man whose name is spelt " Marjoribanks " should call himself " Marchbanks ; " that a family spelling its name " Leveson Gower " should pronounce it " Lewson Gore ; " or a person whose name is spelt " Cholmon- SOCIAL CANT. 53 deley " should call himself " Chumley ; " or " Menzies " pronounced " Minnis," etc., is somewhat astounding, and, in other communities, might lead to a doubt as to his sanity. But that the class to which these personages belong should succeed in exacting of the community the parrot-like acceptation of these wayward pro- nunciations that is one of the strongest proofs of its social power, as it is undoubtedly one of the strongest proofs of the mental debasement of those who are not ashamed to submit to such dictation. VII. Next to our slavish affectation in the pronunciation of names, our affectation of a certain coldness of manner deserves to be mentioned. That coldness of manner is only natural and original in the aristocracy, and its assumption by our middle classes is as vulgar as it is unnatural. Its unnaturalness is best seen when rapidly succeeded by that hideous grin of amiability which our middle classes ever hold ready for instant use. That a certain deadening of the home affections and a con- sequent coldness and apathy of manner are more or less natural to the aristocracy will readily be seen, when we remember what their family life is when we bear in mind that they grow up with the knowledge of the eldest son inheriting alone the family title and property ; 54 CONVENTIONAL CANT. thus from the beginning forming a barrier to the affec- tions which are so inseparable from community of interests. Such are the instincts we grovel to and try to imitate without having the excuse for their existence among us. And as we imitate even what we do not understand, is it to be wondered at that we bow down to what we are able to realize, namely the social power of our great families ? We have but to note the angry passions let loose by the latest political events in order to realize the social power of a great name. Whilst we hurl anathemas at the head of a Gladstone, and turn up our noses in disgust at his followers, we hardly have an indecorous word for those of great historical names who share his opinions and follow him through thick and thin. The hatred of Mr. Gladstone is not an affair of yesterday ; and yet how completely have his colleagues for years past the Granvilles, the Hartingtons, and many others escaped the opprobrium heaped on him and on Mr. Chamberlain ! Cant would answer it was because Mr. Gladstone is mainly answerable for all their actions. But we know it is not so : it is simply because the chicken-hearted middle classes do not like to attack their social superiors. It has been whispered that the Prince of Wales has certain radical sympathies ; if so, it is not difficult to find an explanation for them. Quite independent of the motives which a member of the royal family may have for SOCIAL CANT. 55 seeking in the sympathies of the masses a make-weight against the solidarity of a powerful aristocracy; the Prince of Wales must be thoroughly disgusted with what he has been forced to see of the middle classes. No wonder a sickened heart turns to any alternative from such a diet ! Besides, the sympathies of the masses for the royal family are based on a truer instinct than the so-called loyalty of the middle classes. It is true they are willing to grovel before royalty, but their strongest feeling is worship of the aristocracy. Loyalty to the crown is more a feeling for an individual, which such personages as George IV. and William IV. nearly suc- ceeded in obliterating ; but the feeling of worship for the aristocracy is traditional and more deeply national. VIII. In conclusion, we might mention a speciality of social cant, which is almost the creation of the generation we live in. It consists of a peculiar conversational eifort at self-depreciation combined with a hideously gushing appreciation of others, mixed in now and then with sundry gleams of vulgar self-asserting arrogance. Culti- vated women will plaintively assure you that they feel unequal to the strain of duty towards their dear and dearest ones. They do their best, but are conscious of the woeful inadequacy of this "best." They have so 56 CONVENTIONAL CANT. much to be thankful for; they are only buoyed up by the fond love and appreciation of their dear and dearest friends, etc. If you happen to think their dear and dearest ones are a lot of spoilt, selfish creatures, hardly deserving of such a mother, and you venture to opine they are far above the average in their fulfilment of their duties, they cantingly differ from you. But if, relying on their display of unselfish self-estimation, you venture to speak out frankly on social or political matters in general, you run a woeful risk of ruffling their prejudices and their tempers. No more humble self-effacement then. If you are enthusiastic over Dickens or Carlyle, you will be reminded that the one was only a cotter's son, and the other was never a gentleman ! And if you speak disparagingly of Lord Granville, or the late Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Winchester, you will be informed that, whatever else might be their failings, they were the very creme of gentility ! Such are a few instances of the vulgar cant of the upper middle classes in the time we live in. What the " Hero of Heroes " thought of it all, we glean from the following extract of Gordon's Journal (Kegan Paul, Trench, & Co.) : "I dwell on the joy of never seeing Great Britain again, with its horrid, wearisome dinner parties and miseries. How we can put up with those things passes my imagination ! It is a perfect bondage. At those SOCIAL CANT. 57 dinner parties we are all in masks, saying what we do not believe, eating and drinking things we do not want, and then abusing one another. I would sooner live like a Dervvish with the Mahdi, than go out to dinner every night in London." Our canting fraternity does not relish being found out ; but a certain hardness of nerve, innate in the race, places us above sensitiveness to ridicule, and enables us to bear the ignominy with indifference. CHAPTER IV. CANT IN OUR MANNERS. " Manners maketh man." LA ROCHEFOUCAULD. I. NOTHING so much prevents our being natural as the desire of appearing so. The manners of a community are an important item to be taken into consideration in dwelling on its idiosyncrasies of character. Hepworth Dixon somewhere remarks, that the more a nation advances in freedom and material prosperity, or what we term civilization, the coarser and more aggressive its manners become; and he instances a comparison be- tween the manners of the Italian and the Anglo-Saxon race. That may be so or not ; but one fact is undoubted, viz. that England became politically great and powerful in times when the country was perhaps unequalled for the coarseness and brutality of its manners and customs. We have but to refer to the immediate past the begin- ning of the century and peruse some of the memoirs CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 59 of the time to form an idea of the brutality even of our patricians at that period, not to mention the sports and games of our plebeians, their brutal pastimes at country fairs and on popular holidays. And yet the beginning of this century was certainly a period of great national power. One of the first things that strike us in following up this subject is the analogy between our manners and our other characteristics. They are bound up indissolubly with our oligarchic social and political character. They originate in our aristocracy the summit of our governing classes and sink in a diluted vulgar form through our middle classes, till the contact is entirely lost in our humble classes. When it belonged to aristocratic manners to get drunk, the middle classes got drunk too, and the humble classes drank, whether it was the aristocratic fashion to do so or not ; and they do so to this very hour, although drunken- ness has long come to be tabooed in polite society. II. We have somewhat improved on our brutality, but in all our different phases of manners the one stumbling- block, the one rock we strike on, is the hopeless attempt to be natural. That seems almost impossible of attain- ment by our race, except, perhaps, by the very highest 60 CONVENTIONAL CANT. and the very humblest. And that is why we hold of the latter that, although they be coarse, being at least un- affectedly natural, their manners are better than those of the classes immediately above them. Unfortunately the condition of our middle-class society has long been such that, eaten up with social cant, they have hardly dared to " TRY " to be natural. Until lately, the aristocracy has invariably made free use of its natural inclination in the way of manners as in other things. Whether inclined towards brutality in the latter Stuart time, or to sottish- ness or vice in the Georgian era, it was all the same. It was the free and entirely unrestrained tendency at the said periods. But the Victorian era, which has witnessed the final suppression of duelling as a factor in regulating the niceties of social intercourse, has seen our aristocracy drift towards artificiality of manners too; and that artificiality of the aristocracy is the model of the middle classes of to-day. A vulgar imitation of an honest original article is bad enough ; but what are we to say to a vulgar imitation of an artificial original ? For such are the manners of the greater part of our well-dressed multitude of the present day. Now, notwithstanding our inability to be natural, there still lurks behind all our artificiality the hopeless attempt to try and be so, pro- ducing often the most ludicrous, if not alarming, results. Now we are told over and over again royalty is so gracious, the marked value of graciousness striking us so, because CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 61 we have ever been unaccustomed to meet with it in a social superior. Again, our greatest praise of anybody, man or woman, is that they are unassuming and, above all, so unaffectedly natural. This clearly points to the rarity of the accomplishment. All this applies to men and women, though to the latter in a much greater degree. For it would seem, after all, that the struggle of life does so fill up the average existence of man, that he is brought to a more even level of manner than woman, who, particularly in this country, has generally got so much spare time on her hands. Now, it is but fair to assume that a portion of this spare time is devoted to the cultivation of outward appearances and manners, and often with what results ? Not only in middle-class life, but with women even in the so-called upper classes, the unconscious art of manner removed equally from servility and haughtiness (such as is invariably met with in France, even down to the' housemaids in good families) is rare indeed. Cobden is reported to have said, that a French washerwoman had as much manners as an English duchess, which seems to be only one proof the more of his deep insight into our social conditions of life. We must consider ourselves fortunate if, in a drawing- room of ladies belonging to the upper middle-class society, we are not struck with the thought, that a fair average of those present, particularly those who have no longer the charms of youth to do duty for want of mind, might 62 CONVENTIONAL CANT. be more in their proper place, and feel themselves far more at their ease, in their respective kitchens sipping tea with the cook ! And yet, with all that, we are the very people who originated that most hair-splitting of refinements the custom of ladies bowing first. We, who have hardly an accepted code of manners, regulating the minor points of social intercourse, or, if we possess it, most of us seem hardly to be aware of it, let alone practise it, we leave the initiative of recognition to ladies. How courtly considerate ! How extremely inconsistent ! In speaking of our wife we invariably refer to her as Mrs. X, and if our name beginneth with an H, how often that letter is lost to our ear in our nervousness to come up to the dignity of the occasion. How intensely vulgar ! For can we speak of a woman in more dignified terms than by referring to her by the honoured title of " wife " ? A word in itself of more distinct significance and value than its synonym in either French or German. But no, our conventional manners cantingly insist on us speaking of our wife as Mrs. Smith or Mrs. Brown ! Luckily, some people can rise superior to our conven- tionality : for instance, the Crown Prince of Germany, who, introducing Mr. Hall to the Crown Princess at the Crystal Palace, simply named her "my wife." The Crown Prince of Germany could afford to be natural. Would to heavens that a few of us humbler folks could see our way to afford ourselves the same luxury. CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 63 Our stilted artificiality has much to answer for. In writing to a man you address him as " Sir ; " if you were to do so in speaking to him, it would either be thought you wished to be monitory, or that you were unaccustomed to the usages of polite society, which exact a grin, but avoid the direct address. Mr. Escott tells us, in his notice of Bernal Osborne, that he so impressed the Radicals that they used to address him as " Sir." Some may be permitted to doubt whether the Radicals in question were impelled by any great impression in the matter. For it is ten times more sensible to address a man pointedly as Sir, the same as all other nations do in its equivalent, than to hem and haw, and end by that dreadful grin which is the nightmare of all those who have come across our middle classes. The fashion of the present day of giving vent to one's views, or stating an argument in a manner that would not break the shell of a new-laid egg, is also artificial, and doubly so in a country the upper-classes of which, only a couple of generations ago, used to curse and swear to their heart's content. But we could not cast off the coarseness of our grandfathers without drifting to the other extreme which whines and turns up the whites of its eyes when venomously attacked by a political opponent, and calls Heaven to witness our belief, con- viction, and knowledge that no personal reflection was intended by our adversary ! 64 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Our manners have no logical sequence, no beginning, no end. An instance of them which just missed the sublime was when poor old General Haynau, who had ordered some Hungarian murderesses to be flogged, was assaulted in a country where wife-beating ranked among the fine arts ! And yet, notwithstanding all appearances, if once we could rid ourselves of cant, we might reach a high standard of manners, for there is more innate good-nature to be found in the unspoilt Anglo-Saxon than in almost any race. If we in this or in other things prefer the shadow to the substance, the empty form to the real article, and attach a supreme value to an outward grace of manner as the clearest indication of the inner man, even then we are in a woeful plight, for we seek in vain for urbanity and graceful ease of manner in any part of the community. It is not indigenous to our soil ; in other words, it is not an attribute of the Anglo-Saxon race at all, high or low, though both high and low have been known to assimilate a little of it in mixing with the Latin races on the Continent And yet, co-existent with the most incomprehensible dulness of mental perception and want of true delicacy of feeling, there is often a hypersensitiveness in our manner that reminds us of the agonizing process of trying to walk over new laid eggs. This hypersensitiveness, often going side by side with the utmost indifference to the feelings of others, especially CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 65 in the middle classes, reminds us of fever-patients, whose foreheads are bathed in perspiration whilst their other extremities are icy cold. What would become of our manners if we could no longer discuss the weather ? III. There are manners and manners, though a due regard for the feelings of others, added to a certain naturalness and ease, ought to characterize them all. To excel in good manners it is necessary not only to .show these qualities among equals, but also towards inferiors even more than towards superiors. The average Englishman is usually cold if not harsh to his inferiors and toadying towards his social superiors. To strike the right note in our intercourse with different classes, especially our inferiors, an amount of tact, a certain sensitiveness of mind are necessary, and these are impossible without a certain cultivation of the intellect. Therefore it is the greatest possible mistake of our civilization to think an in- tellectual nonentity can be a gentleman, as long as good manners go to form a part of that proud distinction. This holds good even though, it must be admitted, that high- placed people, however unintellectual, hold a certain advantage in a world ruled by outward show and glitter, because they can easily afford to show themselves as they are, and can thus at least be natural. But, un- F 66 CONVENTIONAL CANT. fortunately, they do not always avail themselves of this advantage, and particularly in our time show an exaggera- tion and insincerity of manner that can only be classed as bad manners. Although excess of compliments and thanks are not confined to society in our country, still somehow foreign exaggeration is not so obtrusively hideous and awkward as our own. We began to go rapidly downhill in this respect, when we went in for those conventional terms of " so kind/' " so glad," " so pleasant," etc., which are in such marked contrast to the self-possesion of our manners towards our inferiors. But we are not true to ourselves, for we pretend a sympathy that is totally foreign to our nature. Almost the best mauners in England are those of the policemen, the railway officials, and other distinct classes of men who know their duties and position exactly the rarest thing an Englishman ever knows. How is he to know it, floundering amidst the waves of a tuft-hunting middle class ! It is a relief at least to know, that one form of want of sympathy of manner is not often called into play among our highest and wealthiest society, namely the result of the direct contact with domestic servants that rock of shipwreck in so many thousand English middle-class homes. Our rich have their trained housekeepers as lightning-conductors for the humours and angularities of their ladies. But our middle-class women, with their CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 67 hopeless deficiences of tact and manner, are answerable for the wretched servants we constantly hear complaints about : their incapacity to foster attachment among their dependents ; their inability even to exact respect, except by the aid of an artificial reserve, are well known and deplorable. They give their servants high wages and rich living, and yet they cannot gain in return that one doglike attribute attachment or sympathy. The English race does not supply bad servants ; on the contrary, few races produce such good material. The English aristocracy is servanted as no other aristocracy in the world is. And why ? Because it understands how to treat servants ; the middle classes do not, and the result is chaos ! What a theme to enlarge upon ! How many men have sought refuge in the dreary club-house from the family spectre the topic of the servants ! the ever- lasting servants ! The ceaseless, hopeless confession of the floundering helplessness of our womanhood ; the mene, mene, tekel of our artificial social existence. It seems to be one of the curses of our social life, that we must either be very exalted or very humble in rank in order to dare to be natural. For we have a unique instance in our midst of a talented man (Corney Grain) making a good income by simply portraying in one perpetual sameness, from year's end to year's end, our social awkwardness and vulgarity. The Standard of January 22nd, 1883, contained a 68 CONVENTIONAL CANT. leading article which pointed out the fact of the Empress of Germany having in six years distributed over a thousand gold crosses and diplomas to domestic servants who had remained in the service of one and the same family for forty years. The Standard fancies that if a Long-Service Order were instituted in England the can- didates would be few indeed, and proceeds to deplore the disappearance of feudal manners which causes us to be so changeable, etc. The disappearance of feudal laws and feudal manners has less to do with it than most Englishmen fancy. Far more complex causes account for the instability of our domestics. To begin with, the canting gentility of our clergy has done more to degrade labour and to make domestics and other workers dis- satisfied with their status than anything else. Besides that, we must always have in our eye the want of tact and the vulgarity of our middle classes, the awkward haughtiness and artificiality of our middle-class women, as already pointed out. Intent on fawning and toadying to their social superiors, and in practising social cant towards their equals, what wonder that they are stiff and unnatural towards their inferiors. Hence we have it that long service is almost only to be met with among the landed gentry who at least know how to inspire personal attachment among their dependents. Even when honestly intent on doing our best, it is extraordinary what a gift we have for making our amia- CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 69 bility, our conscientiousness, and most of our other virtues, unsympathetic We no sooner go in for a set of conscientious, well-meaning men, than their unlovable awkwardness puts us out of humour with them and with ourselves. We long for a change. We never seem to believe that people will take us at our true valuation ; we must aggressively persist in rubbing it again and again under each other's noses. We cannot practise our devotions singly and unpretentiously; we must needs put on the face of a plate-passing churchwarden ; or, if that be not enough, then even read the Lessons in public; thus realizing the apt words of Bishop Middleton, " Virtue itself offends when coupled with forbidding manners." We have pointed out elsewhere our want of the power of conciliation towards inferior races, and that is found again in all the above conditions of intercourse. We seem to possess the power of the Romans to exact obedience, but not the Roman, the Greek, or even the Slavonic power of assimilation. That our race does not mix with an inferior one is, perhaps, no result of our manners, but the consequence of a natural law. But we have intensified the sternness of a natural law, and failed to gain sympathy even when commanding respect. Our manners may not be the only cause of this, but they must be and are one of the causes. As a rule, with more blunt honesty of purpose and soundness of heart, 70 CONVENTIONAL CANT. , our manners, even amongst ourselves, but particularly towards our social inferiors, are somewhat awkward, not to say cold and unsympathetic. But it is principally towards inferior races that we may be termed cold and unsympathetic in one word, without " touch." Our insular Pharisaism, and the manner bred therefrom, will account for that, even if our religious and social cant had not already some- thing to do with it. We can enforce obedience; our hardness of nerve secures that, and none since the Romans have understood this better ; but we have never succeeded in gaining touch with the races over whom we rule. IV. Society in England, except that small cosmopolitan section thereof which is almost international, is painful enough by its hollowness, its pretentiousness, its gush, its fetish-worship, but also more especially by its want of any intelligible code of manners. That we do not put our knives into our mouths or use our forks as tooth-picks has long been our boasted national pride; but these virtues seem a small set-off against other crudities of manner. Who has not noticed our pain- ful indecision and clumsiness in bowing, in making or offering introductions? We are told it is not usual to introduce people promiscuously who meet at friends' CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 71 houses, for it is assumed that they are already known to one another. Here again we have an aristocratic idea engrafted on the vulgar middle-class stem. What is true of a society that is strictly defined and intimate amongst itself from one generation to another, is a canting lie with the well-dressed multitude, which still considers itself as belonging to society, although the title-deeds of its drawing-room qualifications might have to be sought for in queer places. How is it likely that the members of a society are invariably known to one another beforehand, when the hosts themselves are often unknown to many of their guests a short time previously, and in many instances, in a London season, would not be known by them next day if they met them in the Park. And yet of such materials is the society of the upper middle classes in the centre of our social life largely composed. But there is no rest for the wicked, and the penalty of being guilty of a lie is as sure as the penalty that overtakes any other form of vice. The punishment is the more inevitable, as it does not so much depend on a divine interposition, as on the fact of every form of vice and weakness carrying its own retribution in itself. V. Let us take the artificiality and monotony of behaviou' of our countrymen at tables d'hote in England a proot 72 CONVENTIONAL CANT. of the utter hopelessness of any attempt at altering us by merely introducing continental conditions of life. We had far better dine alone in our tavern horse-boxes, as our fathers did. However coarse they might have been, they were at least natural in their coarseness and gigantic in their digestive powers ! Why do we take pleasure in reading ,of Dr. Johnson's coarseness and vulgarity? Because it was natural to him. It was individual. If we cannot have individual and natural refinement, let us have at least natural coarseness and uncouthness. It is healthier for the community at large, and not half so ugly as artificial refinement. Yes, our manners are not only often vulgar, but when they are meant to express loyalty, often very ugly. What can be more ugly than the way we surround and mob royalty on all occasions, making it next to impossible for prominent members of the royal family to walk abroad at their ease as other mortals do. We prate and pharisaically dwell on our feelings of loyalty, as if the same were a speciality of our own, unknown to other communities. We need not point by comparison to the loyalty of other races to their sovereigns, which has stood the test of political misfortune. We have to go back to the times of the Pretender on the Scotch hills to recall anything in our own history to test the value of loyalty in misfortune ; but of the loyalty to the reigning sovereign it may boldly be asserted that whether our CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 73 own be deeper and more sincere than that of other nations, it is undoubtedly more vulgar than that of any other nation. We have prostituted the very word "loyalty," which, in its original signification, simply meant "law-abiding." We have brought it to mean a quality which is incom- patible with the faintest suspicion of self-respect. And when we carry the word with us into remote parts of the earth, we call those natives " loyal " who treacherously assist us to slaughter their fellow-men. If you want to know what that sentiment is that worships the representative of a royal house with a romantic if not a religiously venerating attachment, you must look back to the history of the Stuarts and their fortunes in Scotland. If you want to go farther afield, glance at the history of those military despotisms you have been such adepts in deriding, and you will find touches of "loyalty" that might shame your middle classes out of ever employing the word. For we are not of those that laugh at the sentiment of loyalty ; far from it. Let us by all means be loyal to a principle, and loyal in our admiration and devotion to a person, if we can find one deserving our best sentiments. We cannot help admiring the loyalty of the poor half- starved Berliners who came out to welcome back the great Frederick after the death-grapple of seven years. Even more do we admire the loyal devotion of the 74 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Austrian people during the Napoleonic wars, when their capital was repeatedly taken and they themselves were bleeding from the wounds of a hundred pitched battles lost ! Or even the loyalty of the Sardinians to Charles Albert, after the disastrous day of Novara, might call for our admiration. For these are instances of loyalty in misfortune, and go to prove the old saw that blood is thicker than water. Holy Russia, with all her mediaeval wickednesses and abuses, can still show us what loyalty is, and the power of sentiment among a mighty people. Side by side with Nihilism and Revolution there is still among the Russians a fund of loyalty, which has stood the test of misfortune in the past and which, if we are to credit keen observers, would rise superior to misfortune if called upon. Cant prefers to dwell on Russian corruption, Russian aggression, and that favourite English fault impecuniosity : want of respectability ! But some can remember the riot in St. Petersburg during the cholera scare, when that archtype of a despotic ruler, but honourable man, the Emperor Nicholas rushed alone and bareheaded among the frantic throng calling upon them to go down on their knees and pray ! Do not undervalue the power underlying such sentiment, but do not confound it with your middle-class loyalty ! What that is like the following extract of a London paper will show : " Half-a-dozen of the royalties who have been CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 75 staying at Osborne during the last fortnight drove Over to Ryde one afternoon last week, and, having put up their carriages, they walked down to the Esplanade, in- tending to take a turn along the pier; but they had forgotten the pertinacious impudence of the British snob, for, being quickly recognized, they were so unpleasantly mobbed by a ' genteel ' crowd, that they were obliged hurriedly to take refuge in an hotel, and while they stayed there for tea, in the hope of getting away quietly, quite a crowd of people assembled in front At Ems, the Emperor and other royalties walk about without any fuss, and nobody ever thinks of giving them a second glance, much less of assailing them ; but at an English watering-place a royal personage cannot walk a dozen steps without annoyance." VI. Some little time ago, the Emperor of Austria visited the Adelsberg caves, and, moved by the grandeur of the scenery, exclaimed to a local dignitary, "How weak and small we all are compared to the almightiness of Nature." The latter, somewhat in a fix, ejaculated, " But surely not your Majesty." Whereupon Francis Joseph smilingly replied, "Yes, even I, as well as you." If we could imagine a similar episode occurring in our country, it would in all probability have put the English civic mind into a still greater fix. " May it please your 76 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Majesty to except your Majesty from all comparison with common nature, your Majesty." Yes, we have a style peculiar to ourselves. If we consider what cir- cumstances have surrounded the Prince of Wales for so many years, we must almost wonder if he does not long to kick a lot of people to whom he is bound to be polite. What must such a man, if only endowed with ordinary acumen, and there is little doubt that he is endowed with more than ordinary perspicacity, think of the manners of those that will not allow him to breathe without receiving addresses. They say he is a Radical at heart ; if so, it is easy to guess the reasons, namely his disgust at the flunkeydom and arrogance of those upper middle classes he has to come in perpetual contact with and to endure ! There have been toadies and flunkeys alternately cringing and impertinent in all times and in all social fabrics, but they were not all freeborn Englishmen. There were poor dogs with doglike natures among them, but few of them were adept disciples of cant, who, whilst clumsily shuffling and grovelling in the dirt, prided themselves on being freeborn Church- going Britons, whose houses are their castles. Others might fawn like dogs or savages, but the fawning Eng- lishman is not only more offensive than they, he is uglier and clumsier than any fawning animal. Like our modern British drunkard, man or woman, who carries off the palm of transcendent bestiality, he is unique. CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 77 We are ourselves even perfectly conscious at heart that it is so that we are mostly without manners ; and when we try to ape those of others, we make a vulgar fiasco of it. Who does not remember the surprise of many that the two working-men sent to Parliament should have shown themselves so able, not only in mental powers, but in manners too ! They were natural. We were so little accustomed to it. Then again, lately, as mentioned elsewhere, note the surprise of the public at the decent behaviour of the masses when admitted into aristocratic pleasure-grounds on Sundays. Your middle class finds it hard to believe in decency, even though discovered outside its own sacred limits. VII. Sometimes it seems as if we almost expected to be knocked down like ninepins by our social superiors, or at le.ast to meet with haughty brutality; and this not- withstanding that aristocratic brutality has long since been discarded by our social rulers. For they have long discovered that the suaviter in modo can be advan- tageously combined with the fortiter in re. If good manners were not so rare among us, surely it would not be possible to gain such enormous personal popularity by a small display of amiability, as not only royalty, but even the aristocracy constantly do. Yes, 78 CONVENTIONAL CANT. we need not despair. There are still good manners to be found in England, as there is still gold to be found in the sand of some continental rivers. But the difference between continental gold and good manners in England is this, that whereas the former does not repay the trouble of seeking, the latter repays those exceedingly well that practise them; for, being so rare, they are at a high premium, and when once their cultivation is thoroughly understood, there are few things we cannot hope to attain by their aid. That is at all events a negative advantage we possess over foreigners, who are unable to gain much popularity by urbanity of manner; it is too much a general attribute to excite remark, much less admiration. But we even sometimes go the length of being suspicious of graciousness, unless we meet with it in a distinguished foreigner. In the political arena we have cast off the blunt brutality of the Palmerston era and adopted the style of manner of the immortal Pecksniff and Micawber. Our leaders hasten to inform the public that they feel sure the last venomous political attack of an opponent was not meant to convey any personal animosity. Of course not ! Cant ! where does thy sweet union with our manners begin and end ? There are some ex- planations for our comparative want of a distinct code of manners that might rid us of our artificiality and the consequent encrusted cant of our social demeanour. CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 79 Do our youth learn manners at the universities? If so, they have a very extraordinary way of showing the texture of the article at the various university comme- morations and installations, where horse-play is the order of the day. VIII. Let us take a glance at the influence of our " manners " in politics. It is a peculiar fact that, whereas the Tories generally end in tiring the public by their want of touch with the home aspirations of the country, the Liberals invariably come to grief, not only by their attacks on vested interests, but also by disgusting a large section of the community with their gross want of tact and manners. That disastrous diplomatic episode between Lord Granville and Prince Bismarck can be traced to the want of tact and manners of that most oily of after- dinner orators. And what a conveniently forgotten lesson it conveyed to us ! Our home politics supply numerous instances where, with all our Micawber-like dexterity, we have estranged, where we might have conciliated and carried our point besides ; but after the above crowning incident of arrogance, followed by a humiliating apology, they are scarcely worth instancing. We keep a foreign secretary and a large diplomatic staff, and a nice mess they often make of our foreign affairs through want of tact alone ! But it is in our re- so CONVENTIONAL CANT. lationship with our colonies, in our selection of pro-con- suls after the Roman type, that we challenge unenviable comparisons. There it is that our national awkwardness of manner shows itself most disastrously that want of a fine perception of the feelings of others commonly called tact, but in politics meaning, in a great measure, the art of ruling our fellow-men, not by the rod of iron alone, but by the superiority of a finely trained mind over an inferior one. Our political laissez-faire system is found unequal to the task of conciliating foreign elements and keeping our dependencies in good humour. We have to take refuge in a little bureaucracy for that purpose. By the time our laissez-faire engine of public opinion is put in motion, we are often hopelessly involved in com- plications, if not in disasters, often merely the result of the perverse harshness of manner of our colonial satraps. Witness, for instance, the impervious Sir Bartle Frere with his Indian manners in South Africa. Where the problem to be solved can be settled by the rod of iron alone we are comparatively successful ; witness India : but where tact is required, we have our headstrong representatives pigheadedly pursuing a course of obsti- nate, though often perhaps well-meant, perversion, which, before it can be stopped by the ponderous working of red-tape officialism, has before now done incalculable harm. For what we call public opinion is invariably too late in such matters to prevent mischief, though it may CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 81 now and then tardily try to make up for it, as in the case of the last Transvaal trouble. Lord Beaconsfield was fully alive to the importance of' refined personal influences as a factor for conciliating our dependencies; but what materials had he to work with ? He sent the Marquis of Lome to Canada ! With what results we all know. And Mr. Gladstone sent an unsympathetic Irish and English landowner there to succeed him. Let us turn for a moment to the pro-consuls our Prussian neighbours employed in 1866 and 1870 in the annexed provinces. Compare men like Field-Marshal Manteuffel and Prince Hohenlohe with our administra- tive material our Lornes, our Lyttons, our Lansdownes ! No wonder comparisons are odious, particularly to those disadvantageously compared. But the comparisons are more eloquent when we compare results. Only the other day the elections at Strasburg and Metz showed such a favourable result for the Germans, as to arouse the surprise of Europe and the especial disgust of France. For the Prussians can show a greater amount of success- ful conciliation in the two provinces of Alsace and Lorraine after fifteen years' possession, than we can show in Ireland after a union of the best part of a century ! We do not maintain that the result in Alsace-Lorraine is alone owing to the choice of the governors themselves, or we might show good results in Ireland, from the G 82 CONVENTIONAL CANT. choice of such men as Lord Spencer and Lord Aberdeen, but we do contend that the results referred to are largely owing to the manner and tact that are, from high to low, a part of the system of conciliation the Prussians pursue. As it is, we have the unique example of Ireland ever before us to remind us of the hopelessness of our attempts to conciliate ! It is the old story : our manners make it difficult for us to please our friends, much less to conciliate our enemies ; for our attempts in the latter direction are often as awkward as our grinning attempts at a smile. Lately a wave of gush has bidden us feast the colonists that have come among us, and what a vulgar mess we have made of it I But that may be inseparable from the commonplace character of the whole enterprise. It is when the elected first representatives of our colonies come among us that we show our innate want of tact. We break away from our canting aphorism of virtue being its own reward, and confer trumpery distinctions on men who at home hold positions analogous to our ministers. We offer them gewgaws, which men of science often decline in our midst, and which are only accepted fittingly and gratefully by our city magnates. Compare such shabby treatment with the effusive prodigality and distinction with which the Russians, or even the French, treat those whom it is their interest to conciliate. While France honoured Abd-el-Kader, and Russia feted the renowned Schamyl, we treat the Prime CANT IN OUR MANNERS. 83 Minister of a mighty continent (Western Australia) according to the standard we adopt in rewarding a provincial alderman. Can it be doubted that, when once our dependencies recognize that their interests are not only distinct, but perhaps antagonistic to our own, we are not likely to hold them by the tie of sentiment ! Even Lady Bloomfield, whom the Queen herself honours with the familiar appellation of "Georgy," in her Reminiscences, cannot help telling us that she was in no way religiously impressed by the Catholic service at St. Peter's, in Rome. This notwithstanding that for years she mixed in Catholic society in Vienna and elsewhere, and to many members of which she would doubtless present her book. Why not keep her want of being impressed to herself? We have stated elsewhere that the Times newspaper is partly answerable for, or at least represents, some of our most unsympathetic coldness of manner and thought. We cannot help being reminded of the dark working of Nemesis, when we read that the last years of the greatest editor of the Times, the late Mr. Delane, were embittered by the cold-blooded letter in which Mr. Walter dis- pensed with his services. " My dear Delane, The time has come when it is no longer to your advantage, or to that of the Times, that you should remain its editor. . . . Your pension will be ^2000 a year. . . ." CHAPTER V. CANT IN THE PRESS. " Combined usurpers on the throne of taste, To these, when authors bend in humble awe, And hail their voice as truth, their word as law While these are censors, 'twould be sin to spare ; "While such are critics, why should I forbear ? " BYRON. I. THE Times, in reviewing Mr. J. C. Jeaffreson's "Real Lord Byron," gives us the following : " But the question still naturally arises, how came the marriage to turn out so ill when it was one of mutual affection." Delightful little bit of unconscious, almost childlike, cant ! Why not honestly admit that the marriage of an erratic, egotistical genius like Byron was almost bound to turn out unhappily, whether based on mutual affection, or on any other factor that drives men into matrimony ? That would have been plain common-sense ; but the writer wanted to affect surprise the usual backsheesh CANT IN THE PRESS. 85 to that Moloch cant. But it cannot be wondered at that we should cant about marriage, when even things of still higher import are not free from our attempts. Certain notorious books are prosecuted for propagat- ing the very doctrines which are found in the works of men like John Stuart Mill, which are actually recom- mended, and given away at our public schools for prizes, while Bradlaugh is denounced as if he were the Beast in Revelation. The fact of many leading periodicals disseminating free-thought ; the fact of thousands of educated men being practically unbelievers, or men of the social posi- tion of Lord Queensberry openly avowing himself one, are passed over in silence. But we have not yet noticed that our press, in its character of the " watch-dog of civilization," should take upon itself to inform us that while we are vainly splitting hairs (for Mr. Bradlaugh, after all, is admitted to Parliament), the skilled artisan and mechanic of the metropolis, in his tens of thousands, is being nurtured every week by every form of agnos- ticism and materialism. We do not refer to a trifling minority who listen to wild theories of occult socialism. No; let any unbiased inquirer take one of the weekly papers to hand, the circulation of which ranges from one hundred thousand to half-a-million copies ! There he will find a weekly list of Sunday lectures, equalling in extent and variety the lis>t of Church preachers in the 86 CONVENTIONAL CANT. metropolis to be found every Saturday in the Morning Post ! These lectures deal almost exclusively with politics and ethics, and as it is only to be expected, with a marked leaning towards unbelief in all religion, and to- wards republicanism in politics. Thus the existing forms of belief are being attacked by the highest- class magazines from above, and by the Sunday-lecture system from be- low. Yet we have never noticed one of our daily papers draw attention to this, although their occasionally doing so would eminently assist us to understand some of the signs of the times, and perhaps partially prevent that periodical feverish astonishment of the British public, when, putting on its hideous grin at any unexpected turn of affairs, it exclaims, " Who would have thought it ? " " You don't say so ! " " How dreadful ! " But it seems ordained that almost every turn of the wheel of time should come on us as a revelation to surprise and unnerve us ! * Cant is largely answerable for this ! For it has ever been a characteristic of ours to vilify those who differ from us, only to bow down slavishly to them later if they and their ideas were strong enough to brave and to outlive our obloquy. The fact of being insincere ourselves makes it impossible for us to believe in and respect the sincerity of others when differing from us. Men of science are quoted as crotcheteers, and Darwin although he honestly avowed that he was * London Riots. CANT IN THE PRESS. 87 agnostic as to the future is buried in Westminster Abbey by a clergy that cannot exchange pulpits with other Christian ministers who have not received Episcopal ordination. " How inconsistent ! " we are tempted to exclaim, and yet how "cantingly consistent ! " We have honestly set to work to stop gambling, and woe unto the poor man who is caught suspiciously toss- ing up halfpence. Betting, as one of the most insidious manifestations of the gambling instinct, is sat upon in more senses than one ; it is draconically prohibited ! And yet if we were to accuse a newspaper like the Times, or any other, of inconsistency not to say of an offence against all moral law in publishing day after day the betting list on the Derby (perhaps with a lot of mild letters to the editor, in the same number, advocating the suppression of gambling at Monaco), we should most seriously wrong those papers. They are perfectly consistent in their inconsistency, and strictly within the letter of the law that safeguard of the rights of property. It is only cant ; they have long ceased to distinguish it : it has passed into their convictions as birds have, according to science, gradually passed from the condition of reptiles. They do not know it them- selves, and therefore may almost claim the questionable extenuating circumstance of sinning in ignorance, though want of knowledge in ethics ought to be no more a palliative than want of knowledge of the criminal laws. , 88 CONVENTIONAL CANT. II. There may be difference of opinion as to the aggre- gate amount of happiness procurable under an autocracy or under a democracy, but there can be no doubt about the greater amount of vulgarity in a community so largely influenced by a canting press as is our own. Our press, which is so well trained, so self-contained and discreet that it strictly adheres to the legal fiction of even treat- ing a palpable murderer as innocent until legally con- victed, goes off the metals at the slightest foreign political temptation : it then becomes aggressive and vulgar. Russia declares Batoum can no longer be allowed to remain a free port. The whole press is in the wildest excitement about Russian treachery ; everything else falls, for the moment, into the background. The Standard pharisaically exclaims that "we" are not going to take the chestnuts out of the fire for "others." How delight- ful is that single word " others ! " How full of cant full as an egg is of meat. A week afterwards nobody looking through the papers need know that a place of that name exists. This little game of bark and brag, and subsequent relapse into silence, is not the less ridiculous because it is of such constant occurence. A little self-respect, however, might make us sick of the vulgarity of the thing. Mr. Charles Marvin, than whom no man has done more to open our eyes to the designs CANT IN THE PRESS. 89 of Russia, is about the last man in the world to use the conventional language of the press with regard to the Russians. When our national blood is roused our press is ever well to the fore. Our military pawns are not only heroes, but the heroes of heroes. Our soldiers are not only brave, but the bravest of the brave. Our exploits are not only glorious, but we must go back to antiquity if we want to draw breath in contemplating a parallel. Our enemies invariably become rebels and ruffians, black- guards, liars, and deceitful intriguers, their bravery fiendish, and their astuteness diabolical. Renegade na- tives that side with us and betray their brethren are dubbed loyal. No sooner have we set up some puppet in one of our dependencies, than our press invests him with all imaginable flattering attributes, among them that gushing quality we call loyalty. Should we experience a reverse in the course of our conquests, that which would have been a brilliant victory becomes a treacherous massacre. For we alone are entitled to stand erect, holding aloft the banner of St. George as the type of unsophisticated and confiding truth and courage. For when we discuss the politics of foreign races and peoples, if they happen to collide with our own interests, and venture to opine that others may have the same aims and ambitions as ourselves, cant laughs us to scorn. " Oh no, you don't know them," we are told, on referring 90 CONVENTIONAL CANT. to inferior races; " they like to be governed by us;" " they like a good thrashing ; you must not judge those ' damn'd niggers ' by our standard." The same as some old fox- hunter, when every other argument in favour of fox- hunting fails him, will tell you that the fox enjoys the fun most. In the same way we were told that the Abyssinians were longing to be freed from their tyrant king ; ditto the Ashantees; ditto the Zulus; and lastly, ditto the Egyptians with regard to Arabi Pasha. Though this is not to be wondered at, considering that up till lately we were daily regaled on the tyranny of Mr. Parnell in Ireland, the Irish people desiring nothing better than his discomfiture. And yet what a parcel of canting lies all these assertions have since been proved to be. Nevertheless, our press still cants about our being popular with the natives in India. Governing races have never been popular with subject races; but it can safely be asserted that the austere religious temperament and the strong class-feel- ing of the Anglo-Saxon were about the least likely of any to win over the sympathies of the sensitive Hindoo. Surely many can remember the foul indignity with which our press treated the Emperor Nicholas during the Crimean war, not to mention the late Emperor Alex- ander II. , who alone, by the liberation of thirty millions of serfs, showed more greatness of soul than any English monarch that has sat on the throne since the Conquest. CANT IN THE PRESS. 91 The ruling authorities and the press of this country having behaved themselves better lately in an inter- national sense, at all events towards the United States, there has been a feeling of increased cordiality between that country and ourselves, set off on the side of the Americans by the natural personal admiration of a chivalrous people for a blameless Queen. This senti- ment is distorted by journalistic cant into the assertion that Queen Victoria is as popular among Americans as among Englishmen, meaning, of course, that the Ameri- cans are such fools as almost to prefer English institutions to their own. Then the appearance of a little satire on certain side-lights of American public life was a golden opportunity for our journalistic pharisaic cant. This is how one of our most influential weekly journals avails itself of it (July 8, 1882): "We may hope for other novels from the author of ' Democracy,' but it is scarcely possible that he will outdo the excellence of what is apparently a first attempt in fiction, a book in which he unpacks his heart, and smiles bitterly over the latest and greatest disappointment of human hopes and dreams." Oh indeed ! It would be interesting to know whether, within the range of " human hopes and dreams," the hopes and dreams of this weekly journal are supposed to be comprised. The Americans can afford to smile " pityingly" (the author of " Democracy " is said to smile "bitterly") at this unique bit of cant. They might 92 CONVENTIONAL CANT. point to Glasgow, Edinburgh, Liverpool, and Manchester, and ask us if the lower classes of those towns are a sample of the realization of our oligarchic hopes and dreams. Might they not ask us to wash a little of the dirt of those towns off our hands before preaching to others ? The Times of October 25, 1883, had the following, in reference to the Chilian peace proposals : " Any termina- tion of such a struggle will be welcomed ; but whether it was worth while, for the sake of some guano and some nitrate, to carry on for all these years an internecine struggle is a question that may be left to the consciences of the combatants." Oh indeed ! the responsibility of a struggle, during which a small but strong community fought for its very existence against overwhelming odds, without breaking a single international engagement, is to be left according to the Times to the consciences of the combatants. Why not have left it at once to the consciences of our spiritual lords? If the Frenchman was right who laid it down that hypocrisy is the homage vice renders to virtue, surely it ought to be reserved for an Englishman to give us an immortal aphorism to define cant. In expectation of a better definition, we venture to style it the apotheosis of the white lie in the land, which, above all others, prides itself on its truthfulness. CANT IN THE PRESS. 93 III. Our cant is not always a backstair, sneaking vice ; for, though it never disdains to strike in the dark, yet it can be as boldly aggressive and vicious in broad daylight as the mad fury of any South Sea Islander. But aggressive- ness is not always to the purpose. There are instances when cant shows itself by the masterly inactivity of silence. For instance, when Gambetta died, it was natural for the Times to pass over in silence the subject of his mistress's presence at the death-bed scene, although to report the filthiest details of divorce cases for consumption at the British breakfast-table was quite another matter. But then cant, like certain animals, has a predilection for its own effluvia; and the Times has long had a name for canting inconsistency before it developed into its latest stage of senility. But neither intellectual senility nor moral elasticity mean necessarily loss of power to injure or to harm ; and the influence of the Times, if not as great as in the Crimean days, is still powerful even when it chooses to be silent. The expansion of the telegraph has introduced a new feature into our journalism, namely that of quoting foreign press opinion often wrongly termed public opinion on every passing phase of our own insular political life. Herein the masterly inactivity of silence 94 CONVENTIONAL CANT. is often illustrated by the manner in which our papers pass over and ignore an opinion that does not fit in with the one they themselves profess. And when a foreign opinion is quoted that happens to add weight to our own, another form of the suppressio veri is often perpetrated by the intentional omission to qualify its value, by stating what section of opinion it represents a point on which the middle classes are invariably perfectly ignorant. Quoting foreign opinion at all is an anachronism to the imperial mind, swayed by the conscious civis Romanus sum. And yet we cant about a foreign-paid press, an un- representative press, a fettered press, and what not. As if our own organs were not invariably owned by wealthy individuals, who see that they pay, and that they repre- sent the opinions of those that enable them to make them pay. And as for fetters, it may sometimes be a matter of regret that we are unfettered to the extent of having full liberty to make ourselves ridiculous, if not contemptible. In some respects even the Russian press has great advantages over our own. Not being yet blessed with our feverish hunger for the latest news, it culls its information more gradually, and having little journalistic initiative of its own, it impartially reproduces the best press matter of other countries. By that means, a far greater impartiality of judgment is attained ; and not being in a hurry, that judgment is not so likely to be coloured with the excitement of the hour, as our own. CANT IN THE PRESS. 95 These advantages were very apparent during the late war scare. Every hour of the day brought us some news of our own warlike preparations ; and what matter they supplied us with to rant and to threaten. We really worked ourselves up into believing we were frightening the Russians ! Anybody who read the Russian papers at the time would have soon had that notion dispelled. Not by their vying with our vulgarity; no, by very different indications : by their quiet, sober, and earnest tone. Hardly had the war-cloud drifted into sight, when the most influential inhabitants of Moscow met together and agreed to subscribe an enormous sum we forget the exact amount, but it was many million pounds sterling to help the white Czar to defend the interest of Holy Russia ! No, you blustering printer's-ink heroes, you will not frighten Russia. You have ceased to think you could frighten the United States, and the sooner you realise the fact that you will never frighten Russia the better. Neither is it in the true interests of this great people that our press should be able to frighten other nations. Those qualities that make our strength, and would eventually bid those pause who sought to intrench on our rights, are hardly represented in our press. IV. But if our press is hardly able to bully great rival powers, it is most apt in making and marring our own 96 CONVENTIONAL CANT. history. In fact, it has had the making of it a little too much of late. That it should have a potent voice in shaping our home policy is, perhaps, but natural and un- avoidable from the small amount of serious, independent, and, above all, unprejudiced thought of the middle classes. But it does far more than that : it designates our heroes for us, and tells us when and where and to whom to bow down in all the walks of our national life. The Times of July, 1885, mentioning the death of Dr. Moberly, the Bishop of Salisbury, tells us there are seven of that name in the Church, and notes it as a proof of the culture of the Moberlys. But the Church supplies comparatively few instances for hero-making ; its best men have achieved their popularity in spite of the press only, when too late, to be grudgingly recognized. We name Bishop Fraser and Dean Alford. The navy and army militant, the diplomatic service, and the parliamentary arena provide the legitimate scope for our press effusiveness to vent itself. The last twenty years have been devoted to this work, and with results that become daily more vulgar and disastrous. The navy in this, as in other matters, has come off second-best ; the naval heroes our press has crammed down the throat of our middle classes are few and far between ; but our army has supplied the press with endless opportunities of exercising its baneful influence. The CANT IN THE PRESS. 97 special war correspondent, as a historiographer, is a peculiar innovation of our time, and a godsend to the eager middle classes. For when the fight is done, our press emissaries don evening-dress and, armed with copious notes and a glass of water, proceed to Exeter or St. James's Hall, to let us " have it." Then it is that the mission of these gentlemen is made manifest, and, to the ecstasy and applause of the audience, it is informed where to apportion blame or praise. Note the murmur of canting surprise when our own special unctuously tells his audience that the biscuits were rotten, the bayonets wouldn't perforate the niggers, and the cartridges wouldn't go off! Lord Chelmsford was described at Ulundi as the storm- directing power, until crackled up and gently eclipsed on his return home, by a public who, for once, would have none of him. Lord Wolseley in Egypt was the object of the canting solicitude of our press, ami with what results we fairly know by this time. The same game was attempted with Sir Frederick Roberts in Afghanistan, with what results we equally know. He would have none of them, and the moral is duly pointed. Sir Garnet Wolseley has been written up into the House of Lords ; Sir Frederick Roberts is Sir Frederick Roberts still. And we can be thankful that he has been allowed to remain with us still ; too few men of that stamp these times call forth. The influences at work, like a sirocco H 98 CONVENTIONAL CANT. wind, are too baneful not to vitiate all but the strongest natures. It is not only that our press, cantingly assuming the role of representing the vox populi vox Dei, makes our heroes for us, it is worse by far to note that these said heroes do not wear. For years, as we have seen already, the Times pointed to Lord Derby as the coming man the man who was to harmonize the feelings of the Stanleys of old with the requirements of our utilitarianism of to-day ; and what a mistake that has shown itself to be. That almost belongs to ancient history now, for it has been eclipsed so completely by recent attempts of a similar nature. Lord Derby at least represented the decorum of a great name and position. It was reserved for our time to discover political genius in a manifestation of aristocratic im- pertinence allied to tame vulgarity. Lord Randolph Churchill is essentially the enfant gdte of our press, that is willing to pay tribute to qualities in the son of a duke, that would have ruined the chances of fifty men of talent of humbler descent. That there are elements in our midst that are only too willing to admire the prize-fighter instincts (though exercised under conditions that pre- clude the possibility of their coming suddenly to grief) of an aristocratic ranter may be admitted, but our press has intensified an admiration that our middle classes were too vulgar to be proof against. To vilify your opponents CANT IN THE PRESS. 99 to appeal to every vulgar instinct of the community, to trample down every consideration that could weigh with true culture without contributing one generous or genial idea of your own, such is the road to political success as taught by the career of Lord Randolph Churchill with the patronage of our press. Side by side with the above, how refreshing appears the platonic admiration of our type-leaders for Sir Staf- ford Northcote of old. It evidences that reverence for social rank that bids, as we are assured, the most violent radical to uncover in the presence of a lord. It is an instinct that has been dwelt upon by every satirist from Fielding down to Thackeray. But when it took the form of listening to poor Sir Stafford Northcote's platitudes in the hope of discovering something coherent in them, it was at least harmless. Much more so than the sneering references of some of our papers to the humble social station of some members of the late Parliament, an idea that has been feverishly laid hold of by our middle classes. And yet the Standard, perhaps dimly conscious of previous fears of what evils the day might have brought forth, presents the following glow- ing reference to the new Parliament in its number of December 12, 1885 : " We are now in a position to compare the materials of which the new House of Commons is composed with those of its immediate predecessors. It need not shun ioo CONVENTIONAL CANT. the contrast ; for, in spite of those prophets of evil who tell us that every enlargement of the Constituencies must necessarily lower the quality of the representatives returned by them, we think it is impossible to maintain that the Parliaments elected after 1867 were worse than those that went before, or that the House of Commons of to-day is inferior to those which flourished before the last Reform Bill Taken man by man, we should say that the House of Commons of 1885 is a better one, on the whole, than the House of Commons of 1880. We observe no infusion of those elements of violence and ignorance which were anticipated by the alarmists. The rural constituencies have shown no partiality for any worse type of candidate than has hitherto been favoured by the urban ones. There has been no revolution in the materiel of the Popular Chamber. What it was before, it is still," etc. Surely we must be grateful that, whilst we are buoyed up with the hope of progressing, we are allowed the certainty of not retrograding. As in the army so in our diplomatic service ; when one of our representatives does his work half-way creditably, our press begins to cant about his tact and ability, till he not only receives some mark of royal favour, but is passed on from shoulder to shoulder up to the top of the tree. Some- times a serious crisis arrives, calling for exceptional ability in those to whom our interests are entrusted, our press- CANT IN THE PRESS. 101 fed mutton looks up to its shibboleth, and it invariably turns out to be an overrated article. Such is the process we continually witness going on in our midst. When our press has temporarily tired of making and marring our history for us, it has its moments of reaction. It longs for something tangible to rest its weary brain in contemplating with the certainty of making no mis- take. Such a mood must have produced the following little bit of cant, culled from the Times in June, 1885, in referring to the parliamentary crisis, when it de- lightedly exclaims, " how great and active " the power of the Crown has shown itself! The above is almost worthy to be bracketed with the following excerpt of the Daily News, June 29, 1885, referring to Lord Salis- bury's action and motives : " The idea, as we have shown, is the precise opposite of the truth. No doubt Lord Salisbury honestly holds it." Why, of course ! V. Crabbe says somewhere, "The press is to all men something, and to some men all 'The pity of it, lago.'" Sad enough, if true. For when we come to consider that the bulk of the daily press only produces ephemeral " opinion," which as often as not is found to be worth very little on the morrow, it is truly alarming what an amount of gaseous matter is daily let loose 102 CONVENTIONAL CANT. upon us under the false flag of knowledge, instruction, and information ! In how many instances, where the greatest world- issues were concerned, has the burden of provincial opinion been right, and that of the press of the metro- polis been entirely wrong, as proved by the incontestable logic of events. It was so in the case of the American war more especially when it became a war waged against slavery. The London press, with a few excep- tions " Abdiels, faithful found amid the faithless "- boldly declared for Southern interests and Southern claims. The "Thunderer" specially had to execute one of its most surprising manoeuvres in the art of trimming and turning right round, and in the process it cooed as gently as any sucking dove. But that alone would not have mattered much ; we have eaten our own words too often for the meal to disagree with us ; far worse was the result. Our moneyed class and our money market were influenced by our London press, and, as fast as we got rid of the depreciated greenbacks, they were bought up by the clear-headed Frankfort Jews, by every continental hotel boots and chambermaid who had any savings to invest. The consequence was that our press ignorance cost us millions, for to John Bull what he misses making is so much money lost ! That touches him if nothing else will. But we are less concerned with the ignorance of our CANT IN THE PRESS. 103 press, and the ignorance of those that believe in it, than with its cant. Our watchdog of civilization never believed in the Suez Canal till it was an accomplished fact. Suddenly it became alive to the supreme importance of that water- way to India, and has ranted about it in and out of season. Just as suddenly it came to find out that the sinking of a single dredger may make it totally useless for months. In 1870, almost all the London press, except the Daily News, was on the wrong side, particularly the Standard and the Morning Post, the two latter being now foremost as toadies to Prince Bismarck, as they were before 1870 on their knees to Napoleon III. The fulsome article of the Morning Post on the recall of Count Miinster from London, may be said to be the climax of its vagaries. The hypocrisy and duplicity of our press is equal to its ignorance. Perhaps the most stupendous instance of daring press cant ever published were the Pall Mall Gazette revela- lations of Modern Babylon. It was stupendous in its audacity and in the baneful character of its results. It was, lastly, unique in being perpetrated under the lying banner of warfare against cant. In scattering filth over the breadth of the land, it caused a wave of unhealthy gush, the indirect effects of which will not be effaced in this generation. It was bad enough to have to stand CONVENTIONAL CANT. by and behold a newspaper literally living on sen- sationalism, cantingly lifting its eyes to heaven and asking us to take it au serieux as the stable-cleansing Hercules of the period ! It was bad enough to have to admit that the state of our laws could be amended by such means ; but it was worst of all to think that the paper in question had succeeded in befooling and enlisting the sympathies of so many honorable men and women, and had thus given colour to a belief in the austere purity of its motive, instead of its being stamped as what it really was sensational cant of the most malignant description. Publicity is our panacea. We have witnessed an evening paper shock every sense of decency, under the plea of fighting against the cant of our supposed virtue, and, in the process, drift into practising the cant of our supposed vice ! But we have not yet noticed an influential newspaper start an agitation for the suppres- sion of the publication of the details of indecent divorce cases. Our press prefers to dedicate half-a-dozen columns daily to such matters when it has the chance, and, in conclusion, to wind up with Pecksniffian lamen- tations, that its duty to the public should have imposed such a sacrifice to its feelings. If our press were sincere, it could as easily unite not to publish indecent trial reports, as it unites not to give an opinion on a pending case. It could do that as easily as some newspapers CANT IN THE PRESS. 105 decline to publish complaints against railway companies and other vested interests that advertise largely in their columns. If our press be sincere, why does it not lead the van and tell us every morning that the sale of clerical advowsons is a disgrace to Christianity ? If our press be sincere, why does it not tell us, in and out of season, that our leasehold system and our land laws will lead to revolution unless altered? that our barristers being allowed to retain fees for work no law can compel them to perform, is a disgrace to our civilization ? Why are we not told the truth, namely that intelligent Americans and continentals know the above-mentioned facts, and laugh and sneer at our stupidity, and at the cant that leads us along blindfolded, but grinning? No ; a leading paper, commenting on a royal marriage, prefers to tell us that, whatever the pecu- liarities (delightful !) of Englsh life, nobody who has once become accustomed to it cares to live elsewhere ! That is easily explainable, quite apart from the known gullibility of the many. English life particularly its social aspect is intensely artificial, and it is a well- known fact that no tastes are so persistent and enduring as artificial ones. The fourth estate revels in its liberty, and continually tells us -that in that liberty our progress is indissolubly bound up. It forgets to inform us that liberty is but io6 CONVENTIONAL CANT. a means and not an end ; and if the means are mis. applied, the end can but come in the shape of disaster and disgrace. But our press only manifests, in more marked features, what may be noted elsewhere in other countries with similar results. What a part the American press played in hounding the North against the South. Who breasted the waves of angry passions and made the reconciliation after the war one of the most unique instances of statesmanlike wisdom in history ? The great characters of the war such as Grant, Sherman, Seward, and others. Who hurried the French into their 1870 catastrophe? In a large measure the Paris press, which is keeping the dying embers of hate ablaze now with the breath of revenge. The same may be seen, under different circumstances, in almost every country. Who intensifies the angry pas- sions of the hour ? The press. Therefore we are led to believe that if it were thoroughly understood that, should a war break out, those journalists who had advocated war would be "pressed," and driven in front among the sharpshooters' skirmishing columns ; if that could be done, we venture to say that the millennium, as far as " universal peace " may be thus termed, would have dawned. CHAPTER VI. CANT IN POLITICS. " I like expressions when they come plainly from the heart, and are not strained nor affected." OLIVER CROMWELL. I. LORD PALMERSTON is reported to have said, " The people of England participate in the government of the country by reading the Times" Lord Palmerston did not cant ; neither does Prince Bismarck, although he has a keen perception of what it consists in, as the following remarks of his in reference to our form of government may serve to prove : " The basis of so-called constitutional government is that clever phrase invented by the English aristocracy for the purpose of consolidating its own power after the great Revolution : the king can do no wrong ; but if the king can do no wrong, it can only be because the king can do nothing. To close the sovereign's mouth to make him (or her) a weapon for the maintenance of io8 CONVENTIONAL CANT. the dominion of aristocracy ; to keep him out of sight, to prevent him from becoming too powerful, by interposing between him and his subjects ; thus has been the policy, and to-day the English people imagine that it is above Queen Victoria. All this, from the aristocratic point of view, is a clever arrangement," etc. Walter Bagehot, in his work on the British Constitu- tion, dwells at length on the power of the sovereign versus a parliamentary majority, and regrets that such power, to be of any good, would have to be wielded by rulers of such exceptional qualities as are hardly likely to be found in hereditary royal families. He evidently thinks, in contradiction to Prince Bismarck, that the power of the sovereign is a reality, though fortunately nowadays, seldom exercised. Now, whatever difference of opinion there may be as to the political power of the sovereign, there can be no doubt of the immense political and social power still wielded in this country by that comparatively small minority, which we will take the liberty of styling our oligarchy, popularly called the upper ten thousand. They form the basis and nucleus of our governing middle classes, and in the present time are more than ever engaged in bolstering up each other against the assaults from without of the newly enfranchised masses. But one of the newest tenets of cant is to deny this, as up till quite recently it used to be one of the most CANT IN POLITICS. 109 glorious war-horses of middle-class cant to praise up parliamentary government as a panacea for everything ! But, then, up till quite recently, that " everything " meant in its results the clipping of aristocratic political influence in the country for the benefit of the plutocratic middle classes. Now that parliamentary government in its latest development means the rising to the surface of the unthinking and unreading, at the expense of the aris- tocracy, and particularly of the middle classes, we hear less of parliamentary patent medicines. Now, whereas we readily see the true position of the different classes of other countries, we cantingly affect to ignore the ruling-class character of our own, at the same time bowing down and toadying socially to an" aristocracy like no free community under the sun. But, then, we are not "free" in the word's truest and noblest meaning. For what is the value of freedom to him who knows not how to use it ? It is as if we were to declare that the deaf are at liberty to attend Mr. Bradlaugh's lectures, or the blind at liberty to look at the Queen, or, to put it even more plainly, we may give the following anecdote : On the accession to the throne of the Czar, Alexander II., the state prisons were thrown open. Among those set free was an old white headed man, who had been confined in a prison cell for over half-a-century. But when he came to use his freedom, it was discovered that the totterin? old man had become a mere automaton. no CONVENTIONAL CANT. After having paced his cell backwards and forwards for fifty years, when set at liberty he was only able to walk three steps mechanically forwards, and three back- wards. Thus it is with us. We have been in social bondage for so many generations, that we are as yet hardly able to do more than our three steps forwards and our three steps backwards, notwithstanding ballot- boxes and extended franchise. The poor old Russian officer died in a few days : freedom killed him. Luckily we are still alive, and with us it can only be a question of time to use our freedom and extend it and consolidate it, either violently or gradually by moral pressure only. But, of course, we do not admit the foregoing. We should not be canting nineteenth-century Britons if we did. We bow down before nobody except our superior selves, like the Spaniard who was afraid of nobody but his own terrible person in the looking-glass. Some of our clearest minds have now and then shown remarkable shrewdness in gauging the state of social and political helplessness in which we still are. The late Lord Derby anxiously styled the process of extending the franchise and "dishing the Whigs" [1867] a leap in the dark ; but Mr. Disraeli strenuously surmised, that the extension of the franchise was as likely to benefit the Tories as the Whigs. Facts have since proved him to have been not far wrong; yet, notwithstanding, we have to-day [1886] our whole Liberal press exulting CANT IN POLITICS. over the new extension of the franchise, and the Con- servative press as unanimous in fear as a herd of frightened sheep huddled together, at the prospect of the leverage of political power going against them. It were in reality a far greater danger for the Tories to teach the already enfranchised multitude to respect themselves and to think, than to enfranchise a new social stratum, to which it may take generations to teach the rudiments of thought. In the mean time, it seems to us just as likely that the masses might become a weapon in the hands of a Beaconsfield as in those of a Gladstone or of a Chamberlain. Lord Sherbrooke, in characteristic style, lately deplored that we were no longer governed by the classes of culture and refinement. Some people may think that the classes referred to have had the exclusive right of governing us long enough, and proved them- selves unequal, if not unworthy, to monopolise the task any longer. But nobody can deny that our ruling classes are still likely to exercise an unproportionate social, and consequently also political, power, for many a long day to come, notwithstanding Mr. Matthew Arnold's affect- ing gospel of "Sweetness and Light." The spot of blood in the race the cringing before our social superiors, that has been matured for a thousand years, and more than ever since the Georgian era of Protestant halo is not eradicated by an Act of Parliament, nor by fifty Acts of Parliament ; nor is it, perhaps, desirable that it ii2 CONVENTIONAL CANT. should be so. Still some of us may wish that we could be a little quicker in taking to what is good in our time without casting away what was sterling in the past But that is neither here nor there. Our contention is two- fold, namely that our social and political character is still, out of all proportion to our written institutions, aristocratic, and that, instead of seeing it and admitting it, we cantingly try to make ourselves and others believe that it is not so. II. It is a dangerous thing to dogmatize on politics. If you are dissatisfied with the present, you are a deplor- able pessimist. If, besides being dissatisfied with the present, you dare to hope for the future, you are a radical optimist with a low moral standard ! If you are a man of strong feelings, you are liable to be told you are one of those vicious beings who would set class against class. As if class had not been "dead set" " above " class since time immemorial. Your hopes for the future are cantingly characterized as wild generali- zations of everything having been wrong in the past ; you are credited with a blind belief in the divine wisdom of majorities, etc., ad absurdam. And yet, if you are not of a type to be easily fright- ened and put out of countenance by adverse criticism, CANT IN POLITICS. n 3 you may feel inclined to take up the challenge, and boldly ask yourself and others : Have not many things been iniquitious in the past ? are not many things wrong still, that might be righted in the present and future, whether by a mutton-like majority, or by one ruling mind like Bismarck, who cares ? You might further ask : Did the possession of land in the past involve obligations on the owner, of which he has rid himself, and placed them on the shoulders of the community, or did it not ? Has class legislation and the aristocratic source and character of our Protestant creed intensified the isolation and misery of our humble class, or has it not ? Or, to wind up with a question slightly out of the sphere of insular politics, and therefore more likely to be judged free of cant : Were the Germans wrong to allow their country to supply the battle-fields of Europe for two centuries ? And are they right now to let others break their heads any where they like, only not on German soil, or are they still wrong? If they are right, why will not cant frankly admit it, although the result has been achieved in face of the opposition of our glorious fetish Parliamentarianism ? And yet our upper and middle classes sympathized madly with France, though they have since cantingly recanted. Need we point to the wretched fudge of our press at the time of the annexation of Alsace and Lorraine ? What did the Times ii4 CONVENTIONAL CANT. know of the legitimate aspirations of a people struggling for very life, and hurling back an enemy that had chosen its battle-field on German soil for centuries, and left ineffaceable memories of fire and sword ? But we are diverging from our subject. Our aristocracy, in alliance with our rich middle classes and the clergy, by opposing every innovation, every concession to de- mocracy, and in the end with cautious cant accepting the inevitable and preparing to oppose, tooth and nail, the next instalment of concessions demanded by the times, the majority of our ruling class had always repre- sented the vis inertia of Conservatism ; and it may be asked whether humanity at least the English portion of it would not have been better off, if, for instance, the aristocracy had not been endowed with that canting cautious foresight it invariably possessed at critical moments, and had rushed headlong into a cataclysm, out of which it would have emerged, phoenix-like, as harmless for evil, as the French nobility of to-day. But it was not to be ; and we continue to wage war against political cant in all its panoply of pride, and ruling- class power, until further notice. Our legislators were moved by a very shrewd and true instinct when they showed their contempt of the Jesuits by tolerating them in our midst They could not be dangerous to the debased and callous poorer classes ; and as for the well-dressed multitude, why, the CANT IN POLITICS. 115 people, or rather the Church, that could produce men like Samuel Wilberforce and other clerical luminaries, need fear no rivalry in the casuistic arts, not even from the general of the Jesuits himself. The slippery Whiggism, represented by a Samuel Wilberforce, is a powerful political weapon, and has more to do with the miscarriage of all reform than the most acrid opposition of fairly frightened Tory land- lords. Yes, as the miller told Frederick the Great, " there are still judges in Berlin ; " so we can still boast of a few episcopal lights, the very creme de la creme of the hierarchical staff, who need not fear Jesuitical comparison. And this, notwithstanding that they no longer show that militant aggressive ferocity, to be without which is, ac- cording to an eminent writer, a sign of the decay of a Church. Our hierarchy may indeed be incapable of firing a nation to martyrdom, or, like Peter of Amiens, initiating a crusade, but it still holds good as the guar- dian of Anglo-Saxon cant and hypocrisy. III. Lord Randolph Churchill, having been proclaimed the coming man by an enlightened press, visits India. On his return he is ready to indict the colonial policy of the empire ; ready to hurl invective and slander at the Government, and is reported to have been effusively n6 CONVENTIONAL CANT. shaken by the hand by Mr. Gladstone. Middle-class cant glories in such a spectacle of political warfare, being so loftily removed from personal animosity, such as exists in other countries ! As the Globe neatly puts it on another occasion : " English politicians have not yet acquired that personal malignity which a few days ago influenced a notorious (how choice !) Parnellite member (cant pre- scribes the term ' honorable member,' not notorious) to rejoice openly at Mr. Forster's sufferings. The fight has to be fought, and some hard and harsh things will, no doubt (how deplorable), be said before the new Parlia- ment is created. But we do not believe (incredulous 'we') that amid the whole turmoil on this side of St. George's Channel, a single voice will be raised in rejoicing at the serious illness of a political antagonist. These ferocities have no place, as yet, in English poli- tics, and we devoutly trust they never may." And yet this very political engine applauded the idea of the resources of civilization not being exhausted, when Mr. Parnell and other honourable members were clapped into jail like common malefactors. In politics, it will always be found more advantageous to snub our privileged classes than to make advances to them. Bismarck could never gain a grin from us till he had snubbed us. Lord Beaconsfield sneered at them, and lived to lead them like sheep. In gratitude, now that he is dead, he is looked up to by them with veneration. CANT IN POLITICS. 117 Yes, when Lord Beaconsfield died, there passed one of those few men who did not take kindly or aptly to cant (partly explainable, perhaps, by the fact of descending from a race which is clever at almost every thing but that). Thereupon great canting expectation of the middle classes, what his famous rival would say in the way of a tribute to his memory. And Mr. Gladstone, though seemingly hesitating at first, did not disappoint their longing. He gave a fervent assurance of his delightful, lifelong, personal friendship with Lord Beaconsfield ! What an opportunity for the crocodile tears of the middle classes ! When Lasker died, Bismarck had few kind words to say of his late opponent. It may not be nice, but it was honest. Now, there can be little doubt that, besides the ex- plainable hatred of the governing classes for Mr. Glad- stone, as the most dangerous enemy of them and their privileges, no small amount of the hatred of which he is the object can be traced to his having rightly or wrongly created the impression that he is an adept in the art of cant. That would account both for hatred and envy; for there is no denying that there are individuals among our aristocracy that do not stoop to cant Some, perhaps, on ethical grounds ; others doubtless because they have been born and bred to stoop to nothing, except to gratify their own whims and fancies ; and some because they do not possess the art of practising it, even if they tried : hence the envy. u8 CONVENTIONAL CANT. In Mr. Gladstone we see some of those great qualities that enabled the English aristocracy to break the power of Napoleon I. ; but we also detect some of the weak- nesses that mark its decay in the present day. Those who believe in the lessons of physiognomy will not be slow to trace a certain likeness in his features to those of Lord Granville, and notably to those of the late lamented Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Winchester, both past- masters in the art an ominous indication of a talent for cant ! But the possession of a talent does not always imply a readiness to practise it, and thus proof of ability would not in this case necessarily mean guilt of com- mission ! But if not directly and personally, then in- directly by the action of his lieutenants, Mr. Gladstone has stood more than once dangerously near the suspicion of gross and clumsy political cant and intrigue. The first mission of Mr. Errington to Rome, in order to gain the ear of the Pope against the Home Rulers, was none the less a canting, doubtful trick, though it failed so dis- astrously. That idea was worthy of having been sug- gested to the late government by a London evening paper, as so many other of their disastrous political moves undoubtedly have been ! Mr. Errington's second fruitless attempt in that direc- tion to thwart the appointment of Dr. Walsh to the see of Dublin was about as dirty a trick as was ever undertaken in party politics, which is saying a good CANT IN POLITICS. 119 deal. The Pecksniffian Protestant Jesuitism, which would fain have crushed out a popular Catholic wish, lying all the time in the House of Commons, was enough to make the hardiest Neapolitan or Levantine blush. Why not openly adopt at once that much- vilified Jesuitic axiom, "the end justifies the means"? It certainly has the advantage of pregnant lucidity and frankness advantages difficult to overrate. How delightful by contrast to think of Lord Palmerston and his blunt declaration already alluded to, that the English people participated in the government of the country by reading the Times (the London evening papers had evidently not risen to their present position in his time). The serene impartiality of young Disraeli also demands a word of recognition his ingenuous freedom from any casuistic scruples or bias at the outset of his political career that impartiality which bade the Duke of Rut- land of the time warn his sons to beware of him ! And how the Liberals and Radicals of our time have been told to see the "cause of all evil" in those sardonic sharp- cut features, which seemed to reflect so small an opinion of those around him ! And yet who to-day would care to deny that Lord Beaconsfield was a great individuality, and, be our political opinions what they may, that he was a great controlling political power, a man of the governing type, a born ruler of inferior men ? Neither CONVENTIONAL CANT. can there be any doubt that Lord Beaconsfield enjoyed a much larger amount of personal popularity than his opponents cared to avow ; in fact, this is more clearly visible since his death. And who would be prepared to say that a portion of Lord Beaconsfield's popularity was uot owing to his freedom from cant ? For the man who frankly told us all, that he had to educate his party the stupid party; and, later on, openly sneered at the " exuberant verbosity " of his opponent, was not likely to condescend to cant ! Many people have professed to find a certain similarity between Lord Randolph Churchill and the late Lord Beaconsfield. It would seem to us that the points of dissimilarity between these two politicians far outweigh any points of likeness. And yet we are almost inclined to think that there is a slight likeness between the two, if only in the freedom from cant of the former. It is true Lord Randolph Churchill is the son of a Duke, and has done things that only the son of a great noble dare do, still in this freedom from cant, in these reckless assertions, which scorn the trouble of giving proofs, which laugh at the flattest contradictions, lies hidden an unfailing popularity. For there are many among us who hate cant so thoroughly, that they will forgive a man almost any tergiversation, contradiction, not to say non- sense, if he will only show himself to be free from this one vile insular idiosyncrasy. However, it is only fair to CANT IN POLITICS. the community at large to remember, that the scion of a great house has great facilities for drawing attention to his reckless inconsistency of speech, thanks to the press and the toadying character of the community at large. IV. As already instanced, Irish contemporary politics supply endless material to illustrate cant. Mr. Parnell whom we were instructed by our edu- cating press, only a short time ago, to consider to be a Celtic bore, a worthy compeer of Mr. Biggar, and a very unworthy successor to the late Mr. Isaac Butt Mr. Parnell has gradually risen to be one of the wire- pullers of the empire. The man we locked up in Kilmainham jail in one of those sham fits of Roman sternness the resources of civilization not being ex- hausted has since developed into the " Premier maker ; " the man whose irresponsible will changes the policy of this world-empire and sends " the people's William " into sudden temporary retirement [1885] ! But British cant did not admit this, though it has since done so, and is still smarting from the blow and sulking over it. And, all said and done, it is too bad ! Mr. Parnell has not even the excuse of being a Catholic. He is a Protestant of the governing classes, who has even accepted a cheque CONVENTIONAL CANT. for ^30,000 from the Irish poor, without sacrificing one iota of his popularity or power. But worse than this ; he has more than once outraged conventionality by re- solutely refusing to sacrifice to the British Moloch. This man has ruffled cant as no man of our generation has dared to do ! That would be bad enough, in all conscience, but the worst is, he has been successful in doing so, and seems very likely to be even more suc- cessful in the future. Yet you are still canting about the wicked influences that account for his popularity the intriguing priests that coax the ignorant masses to the ballot box ! Why don't you get your own Protestant priests to coax your own masses to vote in favour of all your vested interests ? If we look back and compare Mr. Parnell's work with that of the last great Irish agitator, Daniel O'Connell, we get a fuller estimate of Mr. Parnell's eminence and his mastery of all the arts connected with British state- craft Daniel O'Connell was admittedly a great orator ; he electrified the House of Commons. Our senatorial barbarians (Mr. Matthew Arnold's pet term) were put on their mettle and, of course, outvoted the Celtic enthusiast ! It was a grand sight to see the Irish bull roaring in the excitement of hopeless combat; but it was even a grander sight to behold him in the end securely pinned by the teeth of that tenacious beast, the British bulldog. Mr. Parnell, on the contrary, dislikes the part of the CANT IN POLITICS. 123 bull ; it doesn't pay ; besides it is slightly loud and vulgar, and sometimes even liable to become ridiculous. Mr. Parnell prefers to let the ruling-class menagerie have its fill of howling and roaring. Now and then a government myrmidon becomes obstreperous if not monotonous in his invective, like the late Mr. Forster, at the time of the Phoenix Park murders, when the sense of propriety of the House seemed to demand a denial of sympathy, or com- plicity with crime. That was an occasion for Parnell, and he availed himself of it by turning on his assailant and venting all his powers of invective on his head. That done, he sat down again without giving the House the assurance it was panting for ! How much more in accordance with British ideas of propriety it would have been if he had met fiery Forster with equally cheap and passionate expressions of detestation of crime and criminals, and the two augurs had afterwards over a friendly glass indulged in mutual congratulations over their oratorial display for the benefit of the British thistle- feeder ! Poor eloquent indignant O'Connell presided at mass meetings, ranted about the wrongs of Old Ireland. And our executive looked on, asking for nothing better than a breach of the peace, which would enable it to impeach the Liberator ! Poor Dan collapsed ! He threatened, but dared not strike. Cant only wanted him to try, and as he did not, it rode over him. Parnell 124 CONVENTIONAL CANT. does not go in for wasting ammunition for useless debate, he quietly hints at what is coming, and goes into the lobby in order to strike the enemy silently under the third rib. And yet you expect the man you have vilified in every key of the political key-board to be anxious to snatch at the olive twig you alternately hold out and pull back ! When Charles XII. of Sweden defeated Peter the Great at Narva, the latter is reported to have said that his cousin Charles would ultimately end by showing him " how it was done," and in truth the battle of Pultowa proved the trick had been learnt. Mr. Parnell has been most successful in showing us week after week all the year round "how it is done." It may not be a nice clean game though we should be sorry to declare it is at all an unfair one ; it may not be a game to be played in kid gloves ; but at least it has the one transcendent merit that calls for unstinted admiration : it is a game entirely free from British cant ! The Phoenix Park murders, or rather the death of Lord Frederick Cavendish, caused a vacancy in the representation of the West Riding. The noble attitude of the Conservatives, who, with the magnanimity of old Romans were not going to contest the seat, was another delicious bit of cant. A cynic might well have smiled at its shortlivedness ; but it would have been taking Carlyle's estimate of our simplicity a little too literally to CANT IN POLITICS. 125 expect the Roman attitude to last more than twenty-four hours. And it did not last longer. It lasted just long enough to enable a night's rest to clear the matutinal understanding to allow party politics to unmask all their ugly batteries. Luckily, the West Riding election went to prove that the three-card or confidence tricks, how- ever effective on a race-course or in a back-slum public- house, are not invariably winning games in the politics of the period. We all remember the horror of the middle classes at the entry of Mr. Bradlaugh into Parliament. We have some dim recollection of an iconoclastic proposal of his to put a sudden end to the interminable pension list, which is a disgrace to our civilization ; doubly so, when we bear in mind the origin of some of the items ! Of course it was tabooed, but cant has not informed us yet that, since Mr. Bradlaugh's irreverent proposals, over three hundred pensions have been silently and hurriedly commuted. But such are the facts ! V. The solidarity of the governing class supplies numerous instances of cant. The speaker of the House of Com- mons retires to serener spheres on a pension of ^4000 a y ear a larger sum than Prince Bismarck receives for guiding the destinies of the German empire Mr. 126 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Gladstone indulges in a speech of insufferable soft- sawder, eulogizing the lucky pensioner to the skies. Sir Thomas Erskine May, after fifty-four years of labour as secretary of the House of Commons, is also trans- ferred to a better place. He had long been considered one of our greatest authorities on parliamentary pro- cedure, but somehow declined to have anything to do with Mr. Gladstone's latest parliamentary measures : in fact, Mr. Gladstone is said to have refrained from even asking him to do so. And yet Mr. Gladstone is the very man who sets himself the task of praising Sir Thomas Erskine May to the skies before his elevation to the House of Lords. The irony of fate was complete when the very measure was defeated with which Sir Erskine May had declined to have anything to do. Poor General Gordon whom the ruling-class instinct, led by an hysterical newspaper, sends to the Soudan, where he is first isolated, then " hemmed-in," and finally massacred also finds his panegyrist in Mr. Gladstone, who qualifies him as the " hero of heroes." Cant does not stop to ask, if that superlative figure of speech is to have any meaning, what are we to style Gordon's companions and thousands of others, who had not Gordon's fatalistic belief to fire them to duty and death? Such is the solidarity of the governing class, when ventilated by the gusts of the hour : the ladder of ridicule has no more rungs up which to climb. CANT IN POLITICS. 127 But there are also instances of freedom from cant, of a contempt for cant, though they are not always of a satisfactory character. A change of ministry brings with it an immense dis- posal of patronage, representing perhaps in its money value more than the united patronage of all the govern- ments of Europe put together. In its disposal, our executive is not always troubled with the canting affecta- tion of trying to make the recipient a qualified person for the bestowal of the gift. The division of the spoil by the victors, which we find so reprehensible in the Americans, is represented with us by the division of the spoil among a class. Whether the sop-recipient belong to our party or not is often a matter of secondary im- portance ; the first consideration is, that he belong to our class. If he happen to be in the opposite camp, all the better ; we can tempt him to come over. We can sound him first, and if he be get-at-able, we can offer him place, as he will not care for money ; for it is recognized to be far higher strategy to gain over a few stiff-necked Whigs, than to divide the spoil recklessly among the hard-work- ing party-men of small social influence. Even gratitude, like courage, must be tempered with discretion. A man of social position has been knocking a cricket ball about in the colonies ; he must be an authority on the wants and aspirations of our colonists : we make him colonial secretary. Another easy-going man of pleasure, CONVENTIONAL CANT. blessed with enormous wealth and an ambitious wife, has been round the world in his own yacht ; he is the man to "fix up" our navy. Another has libelled the Russian Government ; he is the man selected to rule India, and so on. But, according to Mr. Walter Bagehot, a great eulogist of, and authority on, the English Constitution, this is as it should be, for it would be dangerous to have too much talent to rule us ; we have more than enough already. He sees rather an advantage than otherwise in having dummies to preside over our administrative departments, and to change with each change of ministry : it prevents our administration becoming the victim of crotchety earnestness ! And yet how grateful the people of these islands are when they get somebody to preside over an administra- tive department who is really qualified for the post. The success and popularity of the late Mr. Fawcett at the Post-office is a striking instance in point. And that, although many of his reforms were nothing more or less than a simple imitation that subtlest flattery of reforms lately introduced in Germany by Dr. Stefan. The latter fact has never been recognized by our press : surprising enough, when we remember that these very innovations were taken from a country which, only two decades ago, was about the most backward in Europe in postal as well as in many other matters. If Mr. Bagehot were alive he might have some difficulty to reconcile the CANT IN POLITICS. 129 above with his views on administration in general. And yet this is only a straw, where whole haystacks could be blown over to show the direction the wind is taking. We need only mention our army, our navy, in fact, every department in the government. But it has long been a characteristic of our race to worship power out of all proportion to intellect ; for we have more affinity with the Romans of old, than with the Greeks who represented the culture of antiquity. The English mind is so impressed with the dignity of position, social or political, that it has little energy left to ask in whose hands it reposes. Yes, notwithstanding Mr. Matthew Arnold's affecting "sweetness and light," it seems that, however much we may be possessed of " sweetness," our middle classes are certainly not possessed of enough righteous " light " to realize the political power the written laws of the country give them; or if they do, they have not the moral courage to use it for the benefit of the community at large. But there are signs in the heavens that the new elements that are coming to the fore to weaken the middle classes will gradually awaken to a more direct care of all our interests. When that takes place, they will gently but determinedly unloosen the grip of a class, and gradually disestablish the present irresponsible method of distribu- tion of political rewards and favours. K: 130 CONVENTIONAL CANT. VI. After pointing to the solidarity of the governing classes, as exemplified by the distribution of rewards and the paeans of praise to those who belong to them, it is interesting to note the working of the instinct of self- preservation, when once it is fairly roused. It is interest- ing to note the bitterness of their hatred (and with all our cant no race has ever gone so far in hatred and vilification of its enemies as our own, except, perhaps, the Romans) and the viciousness with which a portion of the press lends expression to it. Let those who care to convince themselves only peruse or try to recall to memory the vicious press attacks and platform accusations levelled against Mr. Gladstone, and, above all, against Mr. Chamberlain, during the last few years. Particularly with regard to the latter, who can forget the foul attempt of press and platform to vilify his personal character ? Yet cant blandly assures us all the year round that Eng- lish public life is supremely removed from the bitter personal animosity so deplorable in other countries. This is all most delightfully interesting, when it goes hand in hand with the usual platform hypocrisy which addresses electors with abject humility, which deplores its own unworthiness, and only asks for confidence in its goodwill only craves for the doglike part of supreme devotion. CANT IN POLITICS. 131 Compared with the above, something is to be said for old Tory landlords, who went home in coach-and-four, distributed parcels of crisp bank-notes, and told their tenants either to vote according to their bidding or to quit ! And even nowadays there is something to be admired in the frank avowal of a Chaplin or of a Lowther that protection is the only panacea for a languishing agriculture. He who hates cant cannot help sympa- thizing with this freedom from it in the expression of views, though he may not agree with them. We believe Sir Rowland Hill for one hated cant. He told the Post-office subordinates that, although he officially subscribed himself as their obedient servant, he was nothing of the sort. But somehow he failed to conciliate ; he was always rubbing against people. Are we, then, to assume, that to conciliate is to cant, and to disdain to do so is to be irreconcilable? VII. In our foreign policy cant has played us some sad tricks ; sometimes in the form of the vilest gush, which, being an offspring of cant, is often difficult to distinguish from it. When the Australian and Canadian contingents came to our assistance in the late Egyptian imbroglio, how we canted and gushed ! The children coming to the rescue 132 CONVENTIONAL CANT. of the " hemmed-in " mother ; the solidarity of the Eng- lish-speaking race all over the globe ; the enthusiasm of the colonies (that will not let our goods in duty-free, etc.). Anybody with the slightest knowledge of the idiosyncrasies of our colonial population might indeed smile at this. He would be able to give a different version of the fable ; he could tell of a blood tie, which only makes itself felt when it is a question of getting something in return. He could tell of a tie that re- quires the gentlest handling in order that it may not snap asunder. We assume that our colonists are idealists with a vengeance, and even if they were so, instead of being the most sober realists under the sun, our administration would be about the last in the world to feed or foster such a sentiment. If only cant would allow us to cast off our ugly pair of blinkers and see truly, we should soon kick against being treated to such arrant trash as the devotion of our colonies. We should soon see what slight grounds there are to believe that they could ever be induced to assist us in fighting our battles. This would'be all the more desirable, as it would by no means involve the renunciation of our optimistic hopes and dreams; only it might involve our looking in another direction for their realization. If you wish to cant about the cohesion of the Anglo-Saxon race, then look, at least, in a direction where you may find something to base your hopes upon. Look towards the United States. CANT IN POLITICS. i 33 The Americans are not likely to be impressed by our game laws, our feudal land-laws with the leasehold system ; they are not likely to become enamoured with us by contemplating our perpetual-pension list, our governing class sinecures, or by hearing of the degrada- tion of the scum of our large cities ; but they love the genius of the English people. They love England as the cradle of their own greatness. Their feelings lean largely towards our history, our literature, our glorious traditions, and that feeling becomes intensified when we behave ourselves in a political sense, and show our- selves from our best side. This feeling, which has been much endangered in the past, has been fostered and strengthened by the democracy of England. Our ruling-class power for foreign bluster and bullying has declined considerably of late years. Figuratively speaking, it has shrunk in size and paled in aggressive redness of colour during the last generation. Among the many causes that have contributed to so desirable a result, besides the increase of the Radical party in England, are foremost the growth of two foreign powers notably Germany and the United States. In fact, it is almost refreshing to find a corner in the globe where the influence of that most objectionable of modern bullies, oligarchic England, is not felt. Just a sentence from Washington is usually sufficient to quiet any little uncertainty of temper that may arise from our part towards that quarter. 134 CONVENTIONAL CANT. And how grateful our oligarchic lions are for a few sympathetic flappings of the wings of the Democratical eagle ! Let us only refer to our smiling press notices on General Grant's British friendly speech in New York in May, 1883. The world has lately been far more interested in the movements of the German ambassador in Constantinople than in those of her Britannic Majesty's envoy extra- ordinary. The English diplomatic noble is still a very powerful animal, but, fortunately, not quite so powerful as formerly. Of course now, as ever, the English ambassadors abroad are distinguished by their indifference to the wants of those who may be really in need of assistance and pro- tection in a foreign country ; whereas they are never known to be wanting in obsequious attention to any affluent member of our ruling classes who may be passing through the capital they are accredited to. They must keep well in with the powers that be ; for is not ours a popular government, and is not our whole political system built up on the principle of self-help ; meaning helping yourself and your class whenever you have a chance ? For at the root of our oligarchic chauvinism is to be found that personal egotism, which has enlarged its bounds and passed on to the selfishness of the class to which it belongs. The idea of silent duty for its own reward is not one that finds favour with our aristocratic CANT IN POLITICS. 135 diplomatists any more than with our latest military and naval heroes. When one of our ambassadors resigns or dies, we are told, that is to say, our governing class say so, and our press gushingly verifies, that there never was such popularity, such tact and urbanity, such personal influence and political foresight. Witness the necrological press notices recorded of the late Lord Ampthill. Yet, during his ambassadorship, Germany and England were per- petually nagging and drifting towards estrangement Not that he caused it ; still, the fact of such having been the case shows us the fulsome character of his panegyrists. The failure of our diplomatists, whether ambassadorial or ministerial, is conspicuous almost whenever they are called upon to act : their old trump-card, threatening to call the fleet, and their general tone, that of clumsy aggressiveness. But the world is gradually growing out of the old Palmerstonian tactics, and has become practical enough to know that an ironclad may be a most interest- ing monster in the water without attracting much atten- tion five miles inland. Lord Lyons, whom the press seems never tired of extolling as the perfect union of aristocratic urbanity and firmness, may have received instructions not to remain in Paris whilst the German armies advanced on that capital in 1870. What would have been the use of having an establishment, French cooks, etc., if there were no longer any guests to be 136 CONVENTIONAL CANT. catered for? For it was never intended for an English, or even an Irish peer to be inconvenienced by the move- ments of foreign armies. So his excellency left Paris, and the care of our countrymen fell upon the shoulders of the American minister, Mr. Washbourne, who remained at his post right through the siege. Thus it seems that the Americans have a different notion of the duties of a national representative from ours. Even comparing our ambassadors with those of European military despotisms, (anglice) like Prussia, we are still struck by the far greater capacity of the latter for endearing themselves to those whose interests they are partly sent to look after. A short time ago (May, 1884), Prince Hohenlohe, having been ten years German ambassador in Paris, all the German gymnastic societies, choral unions, and other gatherings among the middle and humble class German colony, spontaneously vied together in doing honour to him. What English mechanic, or English middle-class business man in Paris cares two- pence whether Lord Lyons has been our ambassador ten years or ten days. The only popular demonstration an English ambassador could hope for would be from the ambassadorial tailors and the soiled fringe of the English shabby-genteel colony which dies to be noticed by his excellency ; a few seedy half-pay officers ; the begging English clergy ; and the parvenu tradesmen who, having managed to be presented at Marlborough House, CANT IN POLITICS. 137 flee their insular antecedents and hang on to the coat- tails of the ambassadorial staff. It is a most unfortunate fact for us politically, that our diplomatists do not possess, to any marked degree, the very qualities with which our toadying press is constantly crediting them. They bear the impress of that narrowness of sympathy which characterizes the class from which they spring. Besides, it must be admitted that our diplomatists have often very difficult work marked out for them. For in cases where bluster will not answer, and we try the unaccustomed method of conciliation and persuasion, we unfortunately have the Russians to deal with. The bland urbanity of a Lord Granville, when trying to prevent the Russians from going to Merv, Herat, or Candahar, is painful. And yet what are we to do unless we can call upon the Russians peremptorily to halt ? That we cannot do ; for our governing classes have an uncomfortable inkling that, for every man we could send against the northern Colossus, the latter could produce a hundred ragamuffins, fit food for powder and shell. It is true we do our best, ostrich-like, to 1 hide our heads from the naked facts of the case, and when they will come before us we try all sorts of consoling reflections. We try to make ourselves believe that native Hindoos, partly officered by Englishmen, would give a good account of any Russians, and similar sophisms. Cant assists us, and we succeed for the time being ; and we will only 138 CONVENTIONAL CANT.- hope the day may never come when an awakening may be synonymous with national misfortune and disgrace. All in all, things look as if the day was coming when our ambassadors need not, as far as our national interests are concerned, be men of any particular importance. That will be all the more to be deplored, as no other class of men are ever likely to succeed so well in forcing the British lion to get on its legs and cut off its nose to spite its face. Other countries have aristocratic diplomatists too, but none go quite so far as we in the appointment and retention of hopeless incapables. CHAPTER VII. CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. ' ' First, we must consider what we are ; secondly, what we possess ; and thirdly, what we seem." SCHOPENHAUER. "Thoughts are but dreams till their effects be tried." SHAKE- SPEARE. WE are born and bred in the belief of the unsurpassed excellence of our parliamentary government, and our ingrained Pharisaism assists us a step farther, namely to the conclusion that it is the only form of government worth thinking of, or worth discussion. We have shown elsewhere that this opinion is not quite shared by all who live outside our insular influences; but that affects us little. Cant successfully prevents our attaching much value to the opinions of those who are unfortunate enough not to see things with our eyes. We will endeavour to point out, from among ourselves, what can be said against the silent assumption that we are the one chosen people in our form of government. CONVENTIONAL CANT. For the spirit of Joshua is ever strong within us, that would bid us ask the Lord to stop the motion of the sun (or, according to our modern version, stop the motion of the earth), in order to enable us to complete the righteous destruction of our enemies. For, like true disciples of the gospel of love, we glory in confounding our enemies, forgetting only too readily that we are often our own worst enemies. The cant of politics, of society, as well as that of theory, one and all will tell us, first, that parliamentary government enables us to govern ourselves and decide our policy in the best possible of ways that of the' un- fettered free decision of the majority. Secondly, they will tell us that this majority is supposed to have the political wisdom of the nation at its disposal, by means of its unrivalled acumen in discovering and selecting it This sounds very plausible, and yet it is true only in theory ; and what a canting theory it is that calls it true ! According to theory, the people make their own will felt and give expression to their own wishes for legisla- tion, which only remain to be carried into effect by their representatives in solemn conclave assembled. According to theory, our wisest and best men are chosen to carry out and give effect to the will of the nation. According to fact, taking the last point first, it is not the wisest and best that we select to represent us, but the hardest, the most unabashed, the most able to meet CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. the vulgar requirements of success under our form of government. Our wisest and best sons have only too often been unable and unwilling to fulfil the conditions required to represent us. Our wisest and best only too often shrink from the conditions of a life that is apt to destroy conscientious conviction instead of fostering it. With how little wisdom we are ruled anybody can best see for himself, by skimming the personal memoirs dealing with the politics of the last fifty years, and also by look- ing at random through the columns of our newspapers of twenty or thirty years ago. In order to form an idea in how far we are represented by the wisest and best, we ne*ed but to look a little closer at the modus operandi of our parliamentary elections, and at the incidents preceding and succeeding them. In order to do this, we take the liberty of transcribing the following reflections from a foreign writer on the subject : " How does a man become a candidate for parlia- mentary honours? That the electors seek out and solicit an individual to become their candidate because of his transcendent qualities is a very rare occurrence ; and, when it does happen, the chances are that other motives are the cause of it. But, as a rule, an ambitious or wealthy individual foists himself on the attention of his fellow-citizens, and seeks to convince them that he, above all others, deserves their confidence. And what 142 CONVENTIONAL CANT. motive impels him ? Because he longs to be useful to the community ? Who will believe that ! " In the first place, men, whose feelings of solidarity with the community, or with broader humanity, are so keen as to make them seek gratification in the self- sacrifice involved in working for others, are few and far between in these days. In the second place, such men are generally of such an ideal and sensitive nature, that they are the least likely to be fitted to encounter the mental and bodily worries and vulgarities of an election campaign." Such men might suffer and die for their fellow-creatures, but would never demean themselves to soft-sawder an electorate. Such men might serve their fellow-men without any prospect of reward or even of recognition, but would not alternately sing their own praises and cant about their own unworthiness before a popular meeting. Such men are only too likely to suffer from that bashfulness which fools often call arrogance, but which is only the fear of having their ideals besmirched, and which would prompt them to retire within their own privacy and to the society of sympathetic minds. " Reformers and martyrs have sought the publicity of the many, but only to teach them, to reprove them, not to flatter them and strengthen them in their prejudices and errors. Therefore such are more often stoned than cheered." Wycliffe and Knox, Huss and Luther, Arnold of Brescia and Savonarola, have certainly moved great CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 143 multitudes, and excited, beside tremendous hate, also passionate devotion. But I do not believe that they, or that a Jean Jacques Rousseau, a Goethe, a Kant, or a Carlyle, would ever have gained a seat in our modern Parliament. These men do not lower themselves to court electors for the sake of their vote, and particularly not to fight an opponent, who is ready to tread the con- ventional path that alone leads to victory. The way a popular mandate has to be gained, acts from the very start as a deterrent on a high-strung character, but it is no hindrance to the egotist who is determined to do anything to gain recognition and influence. II. Let us take a man who wishes to enter upon a political career. The spur of his action is egotism ; but as it is necessary to take an interest in public affairs in order to reach the public eye, so he must endeavour to do so, or simulate such interest. In order to be successful, he must possess a variety of qualities that are not calculated to enlist our sympathies. He must not be of a modest disposition, otherwise he would be unable to push him- self to the front and attract our attention. He must be able to cant and to lie, for he is obliged to show a pleasant face to many who must be indifferent or even distasteful to him. Otherwise, he would make many enemies. 144 CONVENTIONAL CANT. He is forced to make promises that he knows in advance he will be unable to keep. He must bring himself to appeal to the lower tastes, passions, and prejudices of the many, because they are the most prevalent, and he is bound to seek to please the majority. " These features give us the picture of a physiognomy that cannot attract a refined being. In a word, such a character would never awake the sympathies of the reader. In real life, however, we give our vote to such a man with rare exceptions." Without following our authority into further details, which most inhabitants of these islands can easily sup- ply for themselves, we can readily call to mind how many of our best men have shrunk from the ordeal of canvassing, or have become disgusted with its details, after passing through the ordeal itself. Mr. Joseph Cowen, late M.P. for Newcastle, was so disgusted with election tactics, although he himself had declined to do all canvassing work, or to employ others to do it for him, and although returned at the head of the poll in 1885, that he announced his intention of not seeking re-election on the very day of his victory. An eminent thinker like Mr. A. E. Freeman shrunk from entering Parliament, and even a man like Mr. Anthony Trollope whom even his greatest admirers will not accuse of hypersensitiveness of feeling, for he had ridden half through England in his capacity of Post-office official, CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 145 meeting and canvassing all classes, even he tells us in his autobiography how a parliamentary election disgusted him. It is, therefore, not to be wondered at that we find parliamentary candidates coming more and more from certain classes that are more remarkable for self-assertion than for any other quality. Newspaper correspondents, London barristers, local grandees, and, last but not least, the members of town-councils. In some places, the town-council is the very nursery for parliamentary honours, and that, although it is well known, the best men in a town are rarely asked, or, if asked, would not care to sit in a town-council. We are supposed to elect the best and wisest among our fellow-citizens, but our votes go to him who pushes himself most daringly to the front. We cant about his courage and admire him for it. Education, experience, conscientiousness, intellectual superiority are unimportant qualifications, and they avail him little. What he is most in want of is self-consciousness, audacity, a ready tongue, and often a healthy admixture of glaring vul- garity. In the best case, the man of our choice may be an honest and shrewd man, but he will hardly ever be of a high-rninded, refined, and modest nature. That explains how, in all our representative bodies, talent is often met with, but " character " only in the rarest of cases. L 146 CONVENTIONAL CANT. The men who rule us do not do so by force of their best instincts, but by force of will. And that is not all ; for, if it were to remain there, we should produce nothing but a conglomeration of little despots, each fighting for his own hand. That would at least have the advantage of simplicity, and we might hope to find one among them now and then who, d la Cromwell, endowed with exceptional determination, would knock their heads together, gain supreme power, and use it for the benefit of the community at large. But that seems unattainable in the present day ; we behold our sucking senators, in their turn, moved backwards and forwards, like mario- nettes, by the most irresponsible, backboneless element in the community the daily expression of public opinion on the platform and in the press. Those whose hard- ness of will and nerve has brought them to the front, truckle to the noisiest agitation, which, perhaps, is so bare of all characteristics of persistent will-power, that to-day it often calls for what it condemns to-morrow the very archetype of mental debility. III. Next to our " form " of government and the character- istics of our lawgivers, we cant, perhaps, most about our "method" of legislation, our means of discovering and supplying our wants and needs, the direct outcome of CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 147 our government by ourselves for ourselves "self-govern- ment in more than one sense. " Agitation " is our password as an expression of our wants, and its systematic furthering by our press, the direct means of bringing it to bear on our legislature, we regard as the lawful outcome of popular opinion under the old canting banner of " Vox populi, vox Dei ! " We have become great proficients in this method of legisla- tive salvation. From a cry being first started in a thousand independent centres and thence taken up by the press, we have come to allow a cry to be started by one solitary sensational newspaper, and thence to com- mend itself to our ministers and be hurried through Parliament and embodied as law, without much, if any, inquiry or support from the nation at large. As with law-making, so also with such a course of action as requires no fresh legislation, though its results are often as dis- astrous as if it did. This is our latest development of hysterical legislation, and it is a consolation to know that we cannot proceed much farther in that course without being brought face to face with national disgrace and chaos, things we hope to avoid even on the brink of them. That was not the way the framers of the American Constitution went to work. Not thus, they gave it the stability it is now at last enviously admitted to possess, even by the most rabid Tories, a constitution which Mr. Gladstone thinks " the most wonderful work ever 148 CONVENTIONAL CANT. struck off at one time by the brain and purpose of man," possessing a Senate and a Supreme Court, the like of which Lord Salisbury deplores that we do not possess. Neither is it the method employed in the framing of other constitutions, from the study of which we could only reap advantage. It has not found great favour among the Scandinavians, whose country is never visited by our enlightened few, without their coming back enthusiastic over the amount of happiness and contentment to be found there among the many. But cant soon drives such reflections from our minds and consoles us with the thought that, whatever others may enjoy, we are possessed of the inestimable advantage of a constitution which, built up in the earliest ages, has happily conformed itself to the requirements of the times by the free unfettered expression of opinion of a free and enlightened people ! The suffering and misery, let alone other disadvantages, which this process of assimi- lation, this sternest application of the law of the survival of the fittest, has had in its train, is never dwelt upon. Men like Henry Thomas Buckle would laugh at the suggestion of human misery resulting from the unfettered working of natural laws to which it is our destiny to sub- mit. The man who told us that, do what we may, we cannot get over the average of suffering we inherit, would scorn the idea that individual human genius could, if not change our defective nature, at least better the CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 149 conditions under which we have to encounter the ills that flesh is heir to. What good could individual effort, however sublime, effect, where " causes " lie so much deeper hidden beyond our ken than any effects, however patent and disastrous ? According to that, agitation would be the only legi- timate expression of an opinion which is in itself but the reflex of a deep-seated righteous want, making itself thus felt and heard, and its results can but be taken as universally beneficial Such would seem to be the philosophy of our laissez-faire teachers. We have witnessed or read of many agitations in our time, from the emancipation of our West Indian slaves down to the latest item the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885 ; and what an alternative picture of cant and ignorance do they present to us. Mr. Benjamin Disraeli, in his " Life of Lord George Bentinck," says : " The movement of the middle classes for the abolition of slavery was virtuous, but it was not wise. It was an ignorant movement. It showed a want of knowledge both of the laws of commerce and the stipulations of treaties; and it has alike ruined the colonies and aggravated the slave trade. But an en- lightened aristocracy, who placed themselves at the head of a movement which they did not originate, should have instructed, not sanctioned, the virtuous errors of a well-meaning but narrow-minded community." 150 CONVENTIONAL CANT. IV. But we will refrain from entering into a detailed review of all that is false and meretricious in connection with the agitations ard election cries of the last fifty years ; let any intelligent reader do that for himself unaided. It is worth the trouble of doing, and can best be done in solitude and with earnest concentration of thought. There are exceptions to all things, and the agitation of Mr. Plimsoll, against the crime of laissez-faire, that allowed our merchant princes to do as they liked with the lives of our sailors, is one of them. Cant would point to agitation with satisfaction as the principle that has shown its capacity for good. We would prefer to point to the disgraceful indifference of those principles of non-interference that made such a remedy as agitation beneficial and, as ultima ratio, imperative ! We tremble before the ordeal of perusing the orations of our great orators. We have had earnest orators, as we have had honest men in every walk of life, even returned convicts who have earnestly devoted their lives to reclaim their fellows ; but, as a rule, it is very unlikely a great orator should be an earnest single-minded states- man ; he is too self-conscious. Bismarck is no orator such a man could be no orator but he is a patriotic statesman. This system of government by press and platform CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 151 agitation is making true statesmanship impossible with us. The Americans, it is true, are also blessed with similar institutions, but their power for evil is limited. The press and the platform may send forth their gaseous miasma, they are powerless to influence the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Senate, or to affect the immovable lines of American foreign policy. How different with us. As before said, a single second- rate newspaper is able to" start a cry that reaches over a thousand platforms, and is thrown forth in type by a thousand printing presses, and at last embodied as law ! What next? In the mean time, we make the wildest tentative efforts in every direction, only to turn back and revolve on our own axis. Instead of being led by ideas of equity and justice, we adopt the cheaper formula of enlightened generosity, and make ourselves often ridiculous. The agricultural labourers have grievances ; they agitate, and we generously give them the franchise for which they are not ripe. Ah, it is a proof of very shallow intellect to revile a despot, so long as we find humanity so ready to grin and truckle to worse than he. Agitate by all means, but try to be honest in your estimation of what agitation is made of, and where it is likely to land us. The principles of parliamentary government have made it possible for a man to he barefacedly night after night during a whole session, and yet to be considered a man CONVENTIONAL CANT. of honour in private life. The French are at our heels in this ; the poor Austrians try their best at the same game; the Germans have hitherto not gone far in it, thanks to Bismarck. But that is not all ; the principles of party government allow us to vilify an opponent for doing the very thing we ourselves attempted Such are some of the outcomes of the principles of self-government. Does anybody suppose if we had self- government, or deserved to have it, that we should allow a knot of blunderers to hurry us into Egyptian darknesses ? Cant says we possess self-government, and cant lies ! Representative self-government! Yes, even our uni- versities are represented. Then, why not allow Lloyd's, the Stock Exchange, the Liverpool Cotton Market, the Army and Navy Clubs, the trade unions, why not allow them separate representation ? They are, surely, more important in their representative character than any single university? No, let well alone is our motto. No violent changes that would imperil our principles; let us continue in the wake of our glorious traditions. Sensible and gradual progress and reform are our legitimate wants, and we supply them. We call it sensible progress when we alter our bankruptcy and commercial liability laws, after they have been a disgrace to a Christian state for genera- tions. The knowledge of their past iniquity does not quicken our anxiety as to whether we have no other CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 153 crying cruelties working in our midst. Agitation has not spoken audibly as yet. Agitation has not yet, shrieked out that if we go on believing in the fetish of freedom of contract, without any countervailing checks we shall end in violence and socialism. Our respectable principles incline us to whine over the rights of property. They have allowed the working of the leasehold system to go on unhindered until the land is in fewer and fewer hands. Now that it has become unbearable, and agita- tion is looming in the distance, we prate about the rights of property. Our principles did not tell us to think about the rights of humanity in a humble, but in a timely sense. Property has been our canting fetish, though it so seriously jeopardizes our chances of salvation in another world. Our governing class may rail at an appeal to the masses, but it is nevertheless true that there are the seeds of a deep class-hatred ripening in our midst, and the cant in our principles of government has had its share in fostering it V. Beneath the trade maxims that have helped us to become the nation we are, the cloven foot of cant is easily discernible. We are not satisfied with the pos- session of free trade as an arrangement suitable to our national requirements, but we must needs accept it as a i54 CONVENTIONAL CANT. shibboleth, as a sort of patent medicine for universal application. Our great orators hold their audiences spell- bound by a coruscation of figures showing, as with a limelight, how much better off we are than we used to be. Cant prevents us from seeing, that if we earn more, so also the value of money has depreciated, and not only that, but of greater moment still, other communities, not free trade fed, are also better off than they used to be. The silly many-headed cheer to the cry of the " free break- fast-table," which they owe to free trade ; but cant blinds them to the fearful tale of adulteration, which is not un- connected with free trade, and, above all, with the doctrine of laissez-faire, of which hereafter. Cant will not allow us to see that, though our breakfast-table may- be free, other articles, which only cant would contend not to be necessaries, such as tobacco and beer, are taxed higher than in any other country. Adulteration is even characterised by Mr. John Bright as an unavoid- able if not fair form of competition. The Germans do not think so, and woe unto him who is found guilty of deleterious adulteration. Our penalties for adulterations are such that they fail to act as a deterrent (like our penalties for perjury, or, rather, their application), and as a consequence our humble classes are being literally poisoned out of health and life. We can remember a friend who, entering a public- house in the neighbourhood of the docks, drank almost CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 155 unadulterated sulphuric acid under the name of whiskey ! Our only guarantee against adulteration, and that an inefficient one, is great wealth. For we may be so wealthy, and pay our tradesmen so unstintedly, that they may be moved by the prompting of an enlightened self- interest to see that we get the best of every thing. But how do the masses fare? A Royal Commission if worth the name could easily show, and send our dailies howling as of yore. Whilst free trade has enabled the upper middle classes to amass fortunes beyond the dreams of avarice, it has doubtless had the indirect effect of raising wages, and enabling the masses to buy some necessaries of life (not all, witness beer and tobacco) cheaper. But buying cheap, particularly when the widest scope is allowed to adulteration, is not everything. Nor are high wages everything, when such counterbalancing items as high rent and high price of tobacco and alcoholic drinks have to be met. Besides, the whole community is not in receipt of wages. The small shopkeeper, for instance, is over- burdened with many disadvantages, from which free trade is powerless to relieve him. We believe we are correct in stating, that this very numerous section of the com- munity lives a hand-to-mouth existence in a far greater proportion than does the same class in either France or Germany. We have a certain number of immensely 156 CONVENTIONAL CANT. wealthy leviathan shopkeepers, but side by side with them are a very different class, and we make bold to say, that for every one of the broader ruck who can handle fifty pounds, independently of his business, ten will be found in either France or Germany. But even our free-trade maxims do not always bring us our main desideratum cheapness. Up till lately, any- body who had failed as a pork-butcher could set up as a chemist Our London streets swarm with the glaring, luring chemist-shop bull's-eyes, and yet the poor man pays in some items several hundred per cent, more for his drugs than his poor brethren pay in Germany. But the Germans are a slow, stolid people ; they insist on their chemists passing a severe State examination, and subject them to rigorous regulations for the benefit of the com- munity at large. On the other hand, they do not poison quite so many people by misadventure as our chemists do ; and that is perhaps the reason why a chemist in Germany is invariably supposed to belong to the pro- fessional classes, and takes a position in society a little ahead of his English compeer. Cant will at once retort that our poor get their medi- cines gratis, if they apply for them. Yes, our charity is ever a ready handle to turn aside the true issues of a question. But how about our Patent Medicine Act, that foulest premium upon quackery? How can a nation indulge in pharisaic contentment CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 157 with its trade maxims, as long as it collects a huge sum yearly as the proceeds of the vilest pandering to baneful ignorance known in any civilized country ? Has it not been stated in courts of law times innumerable, that even some of the less iniquitous patent medicines often pro- duce death, when carelessly or ignorantly administered ? But what does it matter to cant ; we continue to buy in the cheapest market, to sell in the dearest, and our ex- chequer takes the premium on stupidity, in exchange for its licence, until further orders. Inconsistency has no terrors for cant when our direct interests are at stake, so we soon cease to prate about the value of competition when it suits our purpose. (Like- wise we can be conveniently silent on the benefits of Habeas Corpus, when it suits us to suspend that pal- ladium of English liberty, and incarcerate an incorrigible Celt.) VI. Lately we have been blessed with a perfect plethora of exhibitions. Our mentors call the masses together like sheep, pass them through turnstiles that register their number, and bid them be happy to the braying of a brass band. We give them every thing except the capacity and spirit to enjoy and benefit by it. An old proverb says, it is no use preaching to an empty stomach. Our exhibition crowds want to eat and drink ; and on 1 58 CONVENTIONAL CANT. similar occasions abroad, they can do so to their heart's content There the grounds are studded with beer- gardens and restaurants for every pocket, strictly con- trolled to sell fair. Walk in among them, and you will see the people enjoying themselves quietly, rationally ; all classes intermingled and well-behaved. How different with us ! Cant sails under the flag of opening up a source of pleasure and culture to the million, but underhandly takes care to tap the stream of lucre for its own benefit. Not fairly and openly is this done in the common course of commerce ; no, slyly, shrewdly, even dishonestly ! Secret influence secures the monopoly of catering for the million. It is a big thing, it must be done in a big way, by a big, influential firm ; and how cunningly it is done ! There is so much to turn over, so much to make out of it. Dinners are arranged from 3*. 6d. to 7*. 6d. a head, and even to those you often have no direct access, whilst the common fry are fed off like so much cattle. You must take a ticket in advance, pass through a turnstile, and be served and turned off like a piece of luggage on a railway truck ! You have no choice ; it is one of the glorious results of free trade. If you are dissatisfied, and feel that, though you have escaped poisoning, you have at least been hustled and robbed, write to the press, it will most likely print your effusion ! But it will not prevent the same thing happening to you next time. CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 159 Is it worth while describing the catering for the poorer masses at these gatherings? Who does not know and shudder at the sight of those beery bars loaded with stale buns, dry sandwiches, and reeking with foul liquors of manifold denominations ? It is the old tale over again our inability to see and to remedy. It repeats itself at our licensed railway bars (the vilest in Europe), at our athletic meetings, at our Volunteer camps, every- where, the same eternal privileged licencecs poisoning us in the land of free trade. In some instances, cant steps in, glorious, patronizing, resplendent ; as, for instance, at Wimbledon, where annually the caterers for that meeting generously and spontaneously give a hundred-pound prize in return for the sole licence to supply the thousands of people who frequent that meeting. It is a big thing, and it is done by a big firm ; but how is it done ? Cant doesn't care ! The public spirit of the said firm of Licensed Victuallers is duly appreciated at the meeting of the National Rifle Association, over which the Duke of Cam- bridge presides. Everybody is satisfied, and they pass on to the order of the day. VII. It is all very well for cant to tell us that free trade by itself vill help us over all our industrial and commercial crises, and thus shut our eyes to other causes that act 160 CONVENTIONAL CANT. perniciously against our best attempts at self-help. Has free trade enabled our poor to get cheap medicines (except by charity), or is the retail trade in drugs and medicines in the hands of an irresponsible set of men, uncontrolled in their trade-union, like the working out of the problem of making the supply meet the commercial demand ? Has our legal encouragement of pernicious quackery by the tax that legalizes patent medicines been a blessing or a curse ? Then, again, our iron output ; how does it stand in comparison to that of other coun- tries. Are we not informed by debates in the House of Commons that the royalties paid to landowners are from 35. 6d. to 6$. zd. per ton, whilst in Belgium and Germany they vary from $d. to Sd., and thus lame us in com- petition with foreign iron beyond all remedy free trade can bring us ? Is this so, or is it not so ? Cant tells us our wicked and drunken workmen will not work for the same wages as foreigners ! This brings us to the sister shibboleth of free trade, namely our maxim of laissez-faire. We cry out, " Leave us alone ; let us work out the problem of the survival of the fittest, unfettered and untrammelled by State legislation : " the glorious doctrine of Manchester and its sleek counting-house evils ! Let the weak perish of drink and despair in the back slums of Salford; do not the strong stand before us in the Manchester Free Trade Hail, and lead their famiiies to church of CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. a Sunday ? Let the State mind its own business ; let it misrule us, estrange our colonies, and tie up the arteries through which pulsates the blood of this mighty nation ; we will regulate supply to demand ; we will make money, and even spend some to reclaim the truculent savage, and get him to appreciate our whiskey and our adul- terated calico stuffs. We want no State interference, nor State initiative ; and the State has not interfered, and the result is, that never before was such wealth side by side with such poverty. Never before was such vainglorious self-satisfaction side by side with such hopelessness, dirt, darkness, and despair. We must credit the cant of our directing minds with having kept their eyes steadily on the main chance throughout the working of our trade maxims. They early foresaw the benefit to enterprise of ridding it of the shackles of the Middle Ages the glorious dawn of the era of freedom of contract. So far so good ; but cant, in taking the credit of this enlightened policy, has added its drop of poison to the cup of our joys : it threw the apple of State indifference in our midst the indif- ference to misery, despair, and death. Let them fight it out ; let the strongest survive : we will rule them all the weak and the strong, the quick and the dying. If a warning voice sayeth, " If you believe blindly in the gospel of buying in the cheapest and selling in the dearest market, you will gradually land up against a M 162 CONVENTIONAL CANT. dead wall the Chinese and Hindoos." No matter. Let the populace buy unfettered in the cheapest and sell in the dearest market ; let them sell their souls even to the highest bidder, as long as they mind that business and leave us the imperial task of governing them through ourselves for ourselves. This has been done ; cant has eaten our very eyesight away, like some terrible Egyptian eyesore, and now we find our executive ready to do anything feudal, radical, or communistic, if we will only allow them to do it for us to remain our canting heart- less figure-head. Our executive still grasps the helm convulsively, sees our army mismanaged, our navy the victim of jobbery, our legal and journalistic professions triumphant, and yet sneers at American professional politicians and Yankee corruption ! Our political doctrinaires of the Radical school are not without their share of canting gush, not without their share of responsibility for our tergiversations in foreign politics. Not content with uncompromising opposition to every effort of rival schools of political thought at home, they extend their antipathies and sym- pathies abroad, without any regard to the interests of their own country. For instance, Mr. Cowen has in his time shown as extravagant an admiration for Italian conspiring patriots as he has ever shown an uncom- promising animosity towards the so-called great conti- nental military despotisms : both attitudes ill-becoming CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 163 a serious politician, which Mr. Cowen's friends presume him to be. But he, like many others, is a doctrinaire enthusiast first, and a politician only afterwards. Nor does it make up for the enthusiastic vagaries of men like him, if they, at any given crisis in national affairs, purse their mouths in classic folds, and rant in the name of imperial interests. Common sense could tell them that their whole bent of thought is full of danger to imperial interests, and cannot be annulled by occasional outbursts of what the Americans call " spreadeagleism." What should we say if Bismarck or lesser German politicians were to go about the country ranting about the wrongs of the Irish ? And yet the conduct of our Radical doctrinaires, ay, even of our responsible statesmen, has been of that description from time immemorial. Instead of trying to galvanize a dead frog in the effort of sympathizing with the French Republic because it is a republic, and of trying to cold-shoulder a military monarchy because it is by necessity one, our Radicals should endeavour to learn political wisdom, whenever they cast their eyes abroad, and not to indulge in their faddish likes and dislikes. They would see the greatest republic in the world fostering the most cordial relations with the greatest autocratic military despotism ever known. They would be able to note that Gambetta, whom they all admired so much, did not carry his hatred of Catholic 1 64 CONVENTIONAL CANT. priesthood beyond the frontier of France, but con- tinually dwelt on the importance of France being the one representative Catholic power in the Levant and in the far East. We might well wish that such lessons of politics, being no ground for doctrinal fads, might not be lost on our Radicals. It would be something to see a group of men, that are at all events honest, show a grasp of international politics in a broader sense than the average town-council spirit. For if they are clear-headed and consistent, the future must belong to them in the direc- tion of our foreign policy, as it already does more or less in the shaping of our home activity. The other parties in the State are but weathercocks, without the excuse of the weathercock, that it is its function to turn according to the wind. We complain of the indifference of Europe and the duplicity of Russia that perennial journalistic war-horse ! But if the Russians lie, we cant, and that is the worse of the two, for a liar is far the more easily detected and discredited. The Russians lie, therefore our line of action is clear : trust them no more ; trust to yourselves. As our knowledge is limited by our cant and our incapacity to see international politics in an impartial spirit, we require at least the only excuse for fanaticism faith faith in ourselves. But you have no faith. Whereas but yesterday the Times used to assure the world we wanted no allies, we only wanted the goodwill of all ; to-day we are cantingly CANT IN OUR PRINCIPLES. 165 looking to Berlin, and asking ourselves and others how Bismarck can be so blind to " his " interests as to let Russia play her little game on the Danube. " His " interests indeed ! If that is the only key-note you can squeeze out of your wizened thorax, then good-bye to all your dreams of blocking Russian influence. The old true-blue Tory is above such tricks they are the specialty of the plutocratic, church-going middle classes. The true Tory never had any sympathy with the transparent cheap ranting of the Latin races, they were always too keen to grasp the substance to lose much time over the shadow. It is true they were not divinely inspired beforehand to see what Prussia was made of; it was easier to look down on the beggarly Germans, with their sixty-four quarterings and an empty cash-box. But 1866 and 1870 changed all that. The Tories can understand the language of blood and iron : they always had a weakness for it themselves. Thus, if they had their will and way to-day, it would probably reflect itself somewhat in the following words addressed to Bismarck : " Let us have no more nonsense ; if France breaks the peace, she will find us on your side ; and if Russia tricks us again, we will count on you." That would be a policy. We do not say it would be the only one ; but we do say it would be a better one than the outcome of our Radical fads, our press hysteria, and our middle-class cautious, canting trimming. But just as in 166 CONVENTIONAL CANT. the eyes of the Chinese we are nothing but opium dealers, so in the Levant we have got the reputation of egging our friends on to their ruin in order to desert them. We are imitating Prussia in many things lately, but in the letter have we appropriated not in the spirit. We are impressed by the victories of 1866 and 1870, but we do not see that those victories are as nothing compared to the spirit that made them possible, and the spirit that has utilized them. Our teachers never tell us this ; but when Bismarck dies we shall suddenly be bidden to admire the retreating shadow, and be as wise as before. No laissez-faire fetish in that man, no sympathy with our cant ! CHAPTER VIII. THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. "That smooth-faced gentleman, tickling Commodity ; Commodity, the bias of the world : The world, who of itself is peised well, Made to run even upon even ground, Till this advantage, this vile-drawing bias, This sway of motion, this Commodity, Makes it take head from all indifferency, From all direction, purpose, course, intent. " SHAKESPEARE. " The end of all government and social reform ought to be the greatest happiness of the greatest number." BENTHAM. I. WE have endeavoured to prove the existence of cant by illustrating it as it is met with in all walks and spheres of life. These illustrations may be taken, in one sense, as embodying its results as well. In this chapter we will endeavour to confine ourselves to the problem of tracing some of its indirect results, including a few instances of revolt against its influence. For no stronger proof can be advanced of the virulence of our idiosyncrasies than i68 CONVENTIONAL CANT. the fierceness of individual and collective rebellion and warfare against them. When the action of the Crown at the Restoration, instead of healing the differences between our various religious denominations, only gave a conscientious mino- rity the choice of hypocrisy or secession, it chose^ the latter. Two thousand clergymen left the Church of England, and we have since had in our midst the grandest instance of revolt against organized worldly cant in history : our Nonconformists a dual spiritual life in one people. But that is matter of ancient history, and hardly calls for more than a passing notice here. It is a miserable history, a recent writer says, of contention ever new, determined only by tyranny never tired. In our time we are struck by two most instructive facts as signs of dissatisfaction with our ethics, and as embodying a revolt against them : the first is the tendency to seces- sion to the Church of Rome among the upper classes, and the other is the spreading of the Salvation Army propaganda among the humble classes. In reference to the first, many will opine that it is merely an indication of one of those waves of sentiment that Macaulay refers to, as peculiar to us from time to time. But it is in reality far more than that, through the causes that account for it. The fact is, man is not governed by logic alone, but by a large amount of senti- ment also, and have been so from time immemorial. No THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 169 greater mistake is made by our doctrinaires than trying to ignore such sentiment. When we seceded from the Church of Rome, we discarded a large amount of the sentiment that had come to be one of the life-giving qualities of that Church, that had held it together for over fourteen centuries. We adopted a creed of our own, almost devoid of appeals to the imagination, supposed to rest its claims for acceptance almost solely on the fact of the Divine revelation, unaided by any appeals to an imaginative sentiment. The northern temperament of our people could certainly better afford to dispense with that auxiliary to faith than those of more emotional races, and has so far thriven in doing so. But our time has witnessed such persistent attacks on the dogma of Christianity from without, that it is not to be wondered at that many, unable to ward off their doubts any longer by an appeal to their reasoning faculties, have felt themselves intensely dissatisfied, if not unhappy, by the little ground left for the imagination to appeal to. Those who found themselves unable to accept the infallibility of our dogma any longer unques- tioned, had but to turn round and behold with sobered eyes a Church embracing but a part of the community, 'nbued with greater antagonism towards sects divided from it by the most trifling of definitions, than towards those in direct antagonism with them on most vital points of dogmatic belief. They beheld a Church with spiritual CONVENTIONAL CANT. aims almost solely following the instincts of a worldly ambition. They beheld a Church, which, truckling to the fountain of worldly grace, showed a scandalous indiffer- ence and inability to enlist the sympathies of the poor. Such results could not be expected to enlist the imagina- tion in their favour, when the faculties of reason were clamouring aloud with doubt ! On the other hand, they beheld not so much the dogma as the practice of the Roman Church, which, built up on the appeal to the imagination, in reality has ever succeeded in that appeal among all classes. They beheld a Church which, in exchange for a blind acceptance of faith, holds out the olive-branch of salvation to all equally the high and the lowliest born, and carries its care for their welfare into practice. Comparing the unreality of our practice with our precepts, it is but natural that those among us, who sought refuge in an appeal to the imagination from the doubts to which their reasoning faculties were subject, should have largely turned towards the Church of Rome. And the proof is, that they have done so in no insig- nificant numbers. This is one of the most striking features of our time, although our press scarcely ever refers to it. And why does our press not refer to it? First, because it would gain nothing by doing so ; and secondly, because it would have to rid itself of cant, and openly ask why these secessions to Catholicism have been so much more numerous in our midst than in THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 171 other Protestant countries. And if the question were asked, it would have to be answered; and the answer would be, that no Protestant clergy show such signs of disenchanting, worldly cant as ours. The answer would be, that nowhere do Protestant bishops exist, who, enjoying princely incomes, have been so unable to reach the sympathies of the poor and suffering. Nowhere do the favoured nominees of an aristocratic Church appeal so exclusively to the well-born ; nowhere are they so entirely cut off from contact with the lowly- born many, as in our midst. Now, it may be opined with some show of reason, if the shallow worldliness of the members of our State Church has disgusted many among us, why have they not joined the ranks of our Methodists, for instance, who, at least as a body, are above the suspicion of worldly self- seeking ? The answer thereto is not far to seek : because once the roots of faith are shaken, as they have been by abstract thought and by the worldly cant in our midst, they could only find nourishment again in a creed so largely watered by appeals to the imaginative faculties as that of the Church of Rome. II. Referring to some of the extravagances of the Salvation Army, the Times blandly informs us that such things are only possible in our country. But that cunning augur 172 CONVENTIONAL CANT. does not tell us "why" such things are only possible in our country. It does not tell us, that almost the same influences account for the rise of the Salvation Army as for the secessions among us to Catholicism : only, the former appeals to the uneducated, whereas the latter have influenced the well-born. It is true the Salvation Army is an ugly, even a hideously vulgar and profane thing : it is wanting in the first condition of all true religion "reverence." But what influences have made our masses so sadly deficient in all feelings of reverence ? Why, the total want of all spiritual influence of any kind whatever. But want of spiritual influence has still left them some imagination, and what an imagination it is, is best shown by the kind of provender that appeals to it. Yes,the Salvation Army is a dire and degrading fact, but we cannot blandly explain it away. It is a hideous protest against our social cant. It is a profane, blasphemous thing, if you like, but it is free of worldly cant. Some connected with it may practise religious hypocrisy ; the " General " himself may or may not be sincere ; but he succeeds where our Church fails ; he succeeds in inspir- ing his followers with the belief that he is one with them. There is a solidarity in that institution which is its strength, the result of community of work and of a belief in community of feeling. For the poor man's heart turns sick at the porch of the well-dressed middle-class THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 173 place of worship. And if he enters he is met by the cold aristocratic character of the congregation. The cosy closed pews, the gaudy dresses, the comfortable-looking churchwardens, with their silver-plated platter of hypo- critical charity they all turn on the stomach of the poor man, for whom our creed promises equality before God, whilst we accentuate inequality in our place of worship more sharply than any other Church on the face of the earth. Is it to be wondered at that this state of things this middle-class respectability chokes him off, isolates him, and sends him in despair to the nearest public- house, where he is only too often joined by his wife and belongings ? And it is not " drink " alone ; for the Dutch, the Norwegians, and Swedes drink strong drinks in large quantities. That which impels them to drink is the root of the mischief. Whilst others drink freely and immoderately, our people are the only ones that drink from despair, for no soothing influences reach them. Our humble classes have no idea of the dignity of life, however humble ; cant has crushed it out of them by thrusting them out into the cold, and leaving them less to live for than the Russian serfs whom our maudlin humanitarians sympathized with. Almost the only chance an average Englishman gets of viewing the rural beauties of his native country is from a railway-carriage window : for everything else is fenced in if not bricked round. At every turn in a pretty 174 CONVENTIONAL CANT. country-lane boards meet your eye with : " Caution," "Trespassers, beware," "Trespassers will be prosecuted," "Trespassers will be dealt with according to the law," (signed) " The Lord of the Manor." Outside of all skulks the poor country labourer, whose only refuge in old age is the workhouse, unless he be lucky enough to fall in with almost more degrading clerical charity. And these poor devils, who for generations have lived a life in many respects more miserable and hopeless than Russian serfs these are the men we have enfranchised, instead of educating those that are enfranchised already. Truly we aie an hysterical people. III. We have no peasant class like many other countries the true Conservative element in every country but our own. Why not admit it at once, and allow that it is one of our greatest misfortunes. We have only got to look to our landscape pictures. Where are the peasantry in them peasantry, as a self-respecting class, with customs, enjoyments, and long-inherited class feelings of its own, as in other countries? To some it would be difficult to find much poetry or sentiment in English scenery, however beautiful, where the total absence of the well-to-do rustic element, as we see it abroad, leaves a void that nothing can fill up. And yet THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 175 our farm labourer, if he emigrates, holds his own all over the world, and turns deserts into gardens. Are we, then, not to be allowed to denounce a state of things that has such power of holding our fellow-crea- tures in poverty and suffering, when it can not only be shown that this is not peculiar to the race, but is consequent solely on the circumstances of its forced existence ? Yet nowhere is an orchard so certain to be robbed as among us, notwithstanding our fetish of the sacred rights of every form of property ! Lord Salisbury lately told the working classes that French habits of thrift were owing to the facilities the French Government securities offered for investing savings in small sums. French thrift is owing to the French peasant not having such an old man on his back as the class Lord Salisbury so nobly represents. Raise the moral status of a man and he will soon look after his own better interests. But cant thinks it has gone the right way to work in giving the suffrage, and thus placing weapons which they do not know how to use in the hands of men who have been held in degraded serfdom for generations. For if cant has not blinded you, cast your eyes abroad. Look at the Dutch peasants, the German peasants, the Scandinavian peasants ; look at their rich picturesque apparel ; look at their gold and silver jewellery, and ask yourselves whether they are not evidences of a dignity, 1 76 CONVENTIONAL CANT. of a pride and enjoyment of existence unknown among us. For their very jewellery, invariably handed down through generations, evidences a stability of family life and thrift that is one of the surest indications of happi- ness. Look at the works of the idyllic painters of the above countries, and behold the pictures of characteristic popular life, full of health and honest sentiment. Where are you to find such amongst us ? Birket Foster seems to shrink from anything more realistic than poor little country girls sitting forlorn on a stile. Hark to the songs of other countries, particularly to those of the Germans, the Hungarians, the Russians, and other Slavonic peoples. Do- they not breathe popular life and happiness ? We have not even got a word in our language to render the meaning of the German Volkslied. And if we examine the few humble ditties that may be said to be known among our working classes, what melancholy stuff they are ! Darby and Joan, for instance, one of the most popular of them, a poor moaning complaint of an old couple, ready for the workhouse, and ready to die there together. What else can one expect when, passing through our fertile country on a Sunday, the stranger sees the country yokels waiting, hands in pockets, outside the public- houses, for the regulation hour of the opening of their harbour of refuge ! And yet these very men could be moved to something better, if it came to them in THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 177 any form, except the cold respectable form of English monachism. Watch these same humble folks when brought up for a day's sight-seeing by private charity ; watch the silence in listening to the organ, or to the admonitions of those who they know mean kindly by them, and you will perceive that the basis of all true religion, the feeling of " reverence," is still dormant in the poorest and humblest Cant has nearly stifled it, but not quite killed it outright. As in the country, so in our towns ; and in some suburban districts the con- dition of things is even worse. Cardinal Manning, in the Contemporary Review of July, 1882, speaking of the population of London, says : " What numbers of them have never been baptized, have never been taught the Christian faith, have never set a foot in a church ! How many are blinded, or besotted, or maddened, by drink ! " And is this not equally true of Manchester and Liver- pool, of Leeds and Bradford, of Glasgow and Edinburgh ? And who must accept the responsibility for all this ? What influences have blinded us to all this and kept us from endeavouring to follow out the words of Christ, who went among the poor and called out to them that they too belong to the kingdom of God ? Many will urge that we can boast of our charity, which is greater than that of any other country. Yes, it is great, it must be admitted, but it is unable to help N 178 CONVENTIONAL CANT. us, even when honest, let alone when vitiated in instinct and unsuited in practice. We can also boast of earnest preachers. We have men among us who, shrewdly tacking to meet the sentiment of the period, combine worldly wisdom with a thin dilution of evangelical dogma. They delight the middle classes, who flock to listen in their gaudy apparel. But the poor do not venture there : they stand sadly aside and listen still to those narrow-minded bigots, who tell them that all our instincts are sinful, that our very nature is lust, sin our inheritance, and death our reward, unless a camel can get through the eye of a needle. What hope can that hold out ? Of what use can that be, when we have been told of all our iniquities for generations, and are still so helpless, hopeless, and forlorn ? Once the above is thoroughly realized, the appearance of the Salvation Army in our midst is explained and accounted for. If our public-houses, our alleys, and back slums, had not been full of poor degraded humanity, longing for some little ray of light, however dim, could such a hideous mockery of every refined instinct of reverence be possible ? Could such a thing take shape and flourish, if the lower strata of the community had not been left out in the cold by those whose duty it was to reach and to influence them ? It is logically impos- sible to get out of this quandary. And it is equally impossible to find any answer but one, namely that the THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 179 Salvation Army is the grandest indictment in our time of our aristocratic Church and its middle-class offshoots.* As surely as the revolt of Arnold of Brescia, of Huss, of Luther, of Calvin, of Wesley, and many others, invariably pointed to abuses and more or less of wide dissatisfaction, so also this latest upheaval of religious fanaticism in an age of eclectic pessimism points to a deep-rooted cancer in our midst It points to the aristocratic unsympathetic character of the creed of our respectable classes, the social and political pillars of which rest on a broad basis of social more than religious cant. Our humble classes, unable to breast the waters of Protestant respectability, have gone in for spiritual mountebankism to the accompaniment of brass bands and bedlamic raving ! The present Archbishop of Canterbury once made an attempt to fill the hierarchical sails with this ugly gust of spiritual wind ; with what result we all know. Cant has long been answerable for much of our Cimmerian darkness : religious frenzy of the most blas- phemous kind is its latest outcome. * At the recent clerical Congress of the Church of England at Wakefield, it was openly stated by a clergyman of the Church of England that the British workman is almost entirely a stranger in our churches. In large towns hardly five per cent, of the population ever enter a church. One of the principal causes of this deplorable state of things is held to be the system of letting seats : a unique invention of ours, which only the Americans have adopted. i8o CONVENTIONAL CANT. IV. We have quoted two instances of wholesale revolt against cant and its results. We will now endeavour to point to a more individual reaction. A gradual undermining of dogma was evident in the effort after manliness, and a robust Christianity seen in Charles Kingsley's life, works, and in his circle. (The same process was so far represented in Scotland by Dr. Norman Macleod, Principal Tulloch, and others, passing into the semi-naturalism of the late Rev. Dr. John Service, of Glasgow, and those influenced by him ; some of his sermons have been published by Messrs. Macmillan.) This prepared the way for, and was succeeded by, a more definite scheme of freethought and rationalistic manli- ness, typified in the movement which gave birth to the " Essays and Reviews," several of the writers of which, Dr. Rowland Williams among them, underwent prosecu- tion. The incapacity of the law-courts to deal with such things effectively has given loose to all manner of varia- tions of reactionary and sentimental expression in Mr. Stopford Brooke, Mr. Haweis, and others. Mr. Haweis, in his lectures on the heathen religions as precursors of Christianity, has, perhaps, gone further in naturalistic theology as reaction than any one else, and has excelled himself in wedding it with popular sentiment. He certainly said what half-a-century ago would have THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 181 subjected him to severe prosecution, probably expulsion. Dr. Parker and his compeers simply represent the same development on the dissenting side. And all this has gone on alongside of a ritualistic gushing protest quite as significant. However, it is not with honest men and their differences of theological views that we are so much concerned, as with the deep and growing influence such men exercise over the middle classes, for they do not exist for the masses. We are in the land of contrasts and extremes. The guardians of social and religious respectability our stolid middle-classes present an edifying spectacle, when we see them dabbling in heresy, under the idea that they are worshipping the progressive spirit of the age in the form of strict conventionality : for that is what the audiences are endeavouring to do that flock to the dis- courses of the half-mystical divines alluded to above. Some of us in fact, not a few have intuitively or instinctively become possessed of the idea that we have been too cantingly austere in the past, and are deter- mined to show that we can undo it in the present. This determination is encouraged and fostered by our press. To illustrate at random. We used to cant about being above the petty vanity of wishing for orders or decorations as foreigners do. The reaction has set in, and not only has her Majesty 182 CONVENTIONAL CANT. created new orders, but lately they have been literally showered broadcast. And not enough with that ; the servant-girl instinct for tawdry Birmingham jewellery has been successfully called into play as a political weapon. The success of the " Primrose League," with its legions of ladies strutting about with fifteen-shilling Birmingham jewels on their breasts, is now almost matter of political history. Why not honestly admit that the Primrose League is a product of the unconscious alliance of the middle classes against the encroachment of the masses ? We used to pride ourselves on being free from the vainglorious boasting of other nations. We have lived to witness the creation of the song, " We don't want to fight," etc. We have lived to see our soldiers, who bear the names of Blenheim, Plassy, Waterloo, on their standards, bespattered with trumpery war medals that they are ashamed to wear. And now the pawnshops are full of them. Our military prowess, which was the envy of the world, has become, not only the subject of ridicule abroad, but worse than that, even among our- selves. We used to pride ourselves on a certain prudery in matters bearing on the breaking of the seventh com- mandment. We have lived to see an ex-minister, under the most damning suspicion of its dastard infringement, not only seek parliamentary honours, that would be but little, but we have lived to see a very considerable THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 183 feminine influence exercised in his favour. In our reaction against cant we come dangerously near the brink of a precipice losing all sense of decency. We have nearly traversed the whole span that sepa- rates the sublime from the ridiculous. We have but few steps to make. We only want the next Premier to make a bishop Lord Chancellor, and an actor keeper of the Queen's conscience. It is as if the community were to say : " Just look at us, we who have been such a set of canting hypocrites in the past ; see the condition to which we have come ! We who have been the proudest race since the Romans ! " Other significant changes of front are noticeable. From being bold innovators, we have come to be servile imita- tors ; not the spirit of what was worth imitating have we seized, but rather the mere letter, or worthless husk. For instance, from being the first country in the world in postal matters, we have come to have to imitate a whole series of Prussian innovations, for they had dis- tanced us. But not content with that, we abolish our easy-working telegraph charges, and substitute the Ger- man clumsy arrangement, counting each word extra, giving the public and the officials needless extra labour. But we are not inclined, after all our ill-timed imita- tion, to admit the true reasons of things, or trace eifects honestly to causes. Are we not nowadays accustomed to admit, blandly enough, that the Germans are better edu- 184 CONVENTIONAL CANT. cated than we are. We even send Mr. Matthew Arnold to Germany to report on their methods of education. But we never ask ourselves how it is that Germans have come to be our superiors in this important matter. Be- cause we should have to confess, that an honest State, deeply solicitous for the welfare of all its children, has devoted itself for generations to their wants. Whereas we have carelessly left the education of our better classes in the hands of a clergy, some of whom, as we have seen, make as much as six thousand pounds a year in the process. As for our efforts to educate our poor, prior to the world-awakening event of 1870, silence is more eloquent than words. In fairness it must be said, that the Times, if not free from cant, usually manages to steer clear of gush. As a proof of this, it recently wrote : " It is worth while to recall, on the occasion of the present enthusiastic spasm of virtue, those words of Lord Macaulay, ' There is nothing more ridiculous than the British public in one of its periodical fits of morality,' etc. In stamping out public vice the danger of promoting private immorality should never be out of sight; the suppression of the casinoes has not made London more moral." V. The Romans of old were outrageously given to cant, in fact as only the English are in our times. Their THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 185 augurs were worthy of our hierarchical staff. It would be an interesting study for psychologists to inquire, in what relation cant and hypocrisy stand to the hardness of race, that has made the English in many respects the Romans of modern times. Do we owe part of our great qualities to the mixture of cant, as some sweets owe their delicacy of flavour to a suspicion of acidity ? Or are we what we are in spite of the above idiosyncrasies ? We who, in the immediate past, cast up our eyes in horror of the stage, are now universally stage-struck, actor- and actress-struck. We who let our classic intellect starve at a time when Voltaire was the companion of a great king, we have suddenly realized that we thought too little of our genius, and the middle classes set to work in their own peculiar way to remedy it. We vulgarly lionise brains, and do all we can to turn the heads of their possessors. Lord Macaulay was disgusted with the vulgar lionising of the Americans : if he lived to-day, he need not cross the Atlantic in order to become familiar with its results. It is not to be expected that we should show the splendid appreciation of our intellect that educated Germany has so long shown for " our " greatest sons, but we might at least hope not to see them spoilt by our middle-class worship. In our reaction against cant, we become noisy lionisers, and set to work to ruin the best intellect among us. 186 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Mr. Matthew Arnold, who is a graceful writer of English verse and prose, we have succeeded in inspiring with the belief that he is the one superior person who possesses the secret of directing our social and political efforts. Still, it would seem out of all proportion to his impor- tance to dwell on his peculiarities at length, if it were not that they supply so striking an instance of the idio- syncrasies of our time. And he has no right to complain. But we are sorry to see serious men reel and stagger under our noisy social admiration. No wonder they have some difficulty in keeping their balance and not degenerating into social jackdaws. Our great Oxford Apostle of "Sweetness and Light," is an inveterate offender against, and not a sufferer by, this. First of all, he is a poseur of doubtful originality. In giving us the gospel of " Sweetness and Light," he forgot to tell us that the idea may not be his own, for the German writer Herder had already, a hundred years ago, given us " Licht, Liebe, Leben," as his motto. That is essentially the same, except that Herder's motto is more compre- hensive, and, above all, more euphonious. But when Mr. Arnold unburdened his heart in that wonderful book, " Culture and Anarchy," and initiated us into his defini- tion of the "Philistines," he only cleverly "adapted." The expression " Philistines." nearly in the same sense as he uses it, or as near as the difference of national circumstances will admit, is as old as the hills, and as THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 187 general as the common sparrow in Germany ! Yes, there is a wonderful difference between introducing the noblest thoughts of one nation to the readers of another, trying to engraft the best of one race on another, as Carlyle did there is a vast difference between that and merely "adapting" a few words, and dexterously running over a gamut of variations of them. And this writer, who holds up the mirror of German Geist for our edifica- tion, fancied he saw the standard-bearers thereof, in Benedeck's camp, in 1866. And when he in words that remind us of a process like walking on new laid eggs describes our aristocracy as the "barbarians," he does not forget to add, after nolens volens admitting himself to belong to the Philistines, that when he takes a gun in his hand and seeks the grouse amidst the heather, he feels he has "barbarian" blood in his veins too ! Of course he does. How could he have lived in Oxford without feeling that, and a great deal more ? Some people may deplore, when they remember the broad sympathies for humanity with which that wonder- ful book, " Culture and Anarchy," is brimming over, that its author did not feel the propriety of refusing the pen- sion of two hundred and fifty pounds a year which he accepted from Mr. Gladstone : for some needy strugglers might have benefited by what was evidently never in- tended for men in Mr. Matthew Arnold's position. But what can we expect in this age of gush and self-adver- 1 88 CONVENTIONAL CANT. tisement, with all our canting theoretical altruism, our gospel of self-denial, and what not? The battle of existence is not an easy one in the age in which we live ; and if we happen to live in a country where our hopes of getting-on in any walk of life are almost certain to be doomed to disappointment, unless we manage to tap the stream of gush or cant, is it to be wondered at that we are, often unconsciously perhaps, anxious to do so? This coxcombry of literary affectation and superiority, however, has its own drawbacks, and proclaims its own weakness to the eyes of common sense. After all, Mr. Matthew Arnold, though he would repudiate the idea of being a follower, is hardly the founder of a lasting philosophy, but only of a sectarian method of thought. " He who comes from the kitchen," as Lavater says, " smells of its smoke ; he who adheres to a sect, has something of its cant ; the collegian pursues the stu- dent, and dry inhumanity him who herds with literary pedants." VI. Now, as we have allowed one class, into which in our time a part of the middle class has* become merged, to be our oracles politically, socially, as well as in the fields of thought and morality, it follows that we could only remain in a healthy state so long as that one prevailing tone- THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 189 giving class remained healthy itself. Now, if it be proven that it is strongly tainted with narrow-hearted selfishness, it is but natural that its influence should seriously affect the tone of the community at large. The middle classes canting, the humble classes brutalised, indifferent, or hysterically salvational, as we see them, we can but consider the whole a sight displeasing in the eyes of God and men. We have been told that the Lord Mayor is the King of Snobs for the year, and the idea may have some truth in it ; but it might be opined that the Lord Mayoralty, the Court of Aldermen and the Common Council, form an institution wrought and perpetuated by aristocratic cunning, to keep the ^-dropping classes continually before us ever and again as objects of ridicule and contempt For if our oligarchic system is rotten, our Bumbledom, as evidenced by the late effusions of the City dignitaries at the prospect of their extinction, is more rotten still, and ten times more vulgar ; and we are thus forced to seek elsewhere for something to which to pin our faith in the future. We have no such thing, socially or politically, as anni- hilation by ridicule or contempt : our daily press and our middle classes have taken good care of that Instead of it, there is no country under the sun where annihilation is so dangerously near for those who are honestly and fearlessly in earnest among us. Our middle classes do 190 CONVENTIONAL CANT. not like earnestness or enthusiasm ; they are things to be discouraged ; we know not their limits. " Sweetness and Light " cannot bear enthusiasm, except it be for ideals over two thousand years old. They cannot come to life again, and inconveniently decline our worship and suggest com- parisons in the mind of the unwashed. Our admiration of remote classic civic virtue is not dangerous by closely suggesting analogous contemporary comparisons. Our press accepts aristocratic presents of game to hospitals, which is eaten by the medical staff, as charity worthy of publication. We accept the Duke of Cambridge's gushing state- ments about our army, notwithstanding the criminal statistics of the said army. We accept the pricking of the thistle for the whisking of the laurel round the hero's brow. Are solitary mortals, then, to stand aloof and damn themselves by calling out to the well-dressed herd, " Mutton ! you are getting near the edge of the cliffs : beware." Who will thank us, and what chance is there of being heard in a community so deadened to the sense of the ridiculous as our own ? Now that we are treating of sentiment, may we not ask, what was it but sentiment the sporting sentiment of the prize-ring that bade our upper classes side with the Con- federates in the American Civil War, and vote Grant, Lincoln, and the other Federal leaders cads, whereas the Southerns were supposed to be gentlemen, one and all ? THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 191 Was not Mr. Gladstone stricken with this class senti- ment ? Did he not say that Jefferson Davis had called a new nation into life, and has he not since recanted ? To show that this feeling was not the fitful ebullition of the moment, but the ingrained sentiment of a class, only the other day Lord Wolseley had the bad taste to express himself in the following way about General Grant : "I have only known two heroes in my life, and General R. E. Lee is one of them, so you can well understand how I value one of his letters. I believe that when time has calmed down the angry passions of the ' North,' General Lee will be accepted in the United States as the greatest general you ever had, and second as a patriot only to Washington himself. Stonewall Jackson I only knew slightly ; his name will live for ever also in American history, when that of Mr. U. S. Grant has been long forgotten ; such at least is my humble opinion of these men, when viewed by an outside student of military history who has no local prejudice." The idea of Lord Wolseley having no "local" pre- judice is delicious ; but how about having no canting class prejudice? If exhortation could influence opinions so thoroughly devoid of reason, it might be of use to ask these partisans to wash their hands, and try and take a lesson from the conduct of such men as Lincoln and Grant ; the latter in 192 CONVENTIONAL CANT. the hour of victory stepping forward to shield his noble antagonist from popular passion. Now, bearing in mind that Pall Mall and St. James's Street have ever been in the habit of drawing their political sympathies (when their direct interests were not at stake) from the prize-ring and the hunting-field constantly showing themselves utterly unable to grasp a political question on its merits, as appealing to heart and mind, it seems rather incongruous to find these very people hard on sentiment. Who can- not remember our aristocratic, though useless, cavalry charges, and our bragging, which made us the laugh- ing-stock of thinking men, whilst our administrative blunders raised a storm of indignation at home. Then how we howled over our losses, whilst other nations bore theirs in silence. That our boundless resources enabled us to pull the cart out of the mud of blunder and bustle never occurred to aristocratic "sentiment." In those days, our enthusiasm, and, later on, our serious appreciation of the indigestible chauvinistic bragging historian of the same, Mr. Kinglake, were worthy of the best days of glorious French bunkum. And yester- day, what was it but ruling-class sentiment that was at the bottom of that most disastrous step of the govern- ment, the bombardment of Alexandria ? In fact, when- ever we come upon a blunder of the Liberal party, we may be sure it arises, in nine cases out of ten, from THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 193 giving way to the ruling-class sentiment of the Whig wing, in defiance of more sober counsels. Whilst referring to this latest and disastrous instance of ruling-class sentiment, let us ask what part our press played in the transaction? Where was the warning voice heard ? Nowhere. The public educator the fourth estate was itself bitten by the sentiment of the hour. VII. Yes, our monitors do not disdain the use of sentiment, although they revile it when employed by an opponent. Still, there is sentiment and sentiment, and we can sooner understand sentiment when appealed to by the repre- sentatives of our great historic houses than when it is appealed to by the alien and Semitic elements that have forced themselves to the fore in our press and our legisla- ture. How much of the influence of Lord Salisbury is owing to the aristocratic sentiment pure and simple, the venera- tion of the middle. classes for the representative of the Cecils ? How much is owing to the qualities of heart and intellect of the man ? That an assembly of generous- hearted and intelligent Englishmen can cheer the cold platitudes of such a man to the echo is after all a poor testimony to the moral and mental height of human nature. Far be it from our thoughts to attach no value o 194 CONVENTIONAL CANT. to an honoured historical name and lineage ; quite the reverse : it is an incentive to high aims and noble actions ; but such aims must be proved to exist, and not doggedly accepted as existing, where all indications point the other way. The Victoria Cross was to herald the millennium by giving all classes an equal chance of favour and distinc- tion, though it already carried the seed of our usual one- sidedness in it, for even the private soldier is with us part and parcel of a privileged class institution, not of a national army. But even taken with that qualifica- tion, what a farce its award is ! In military Ger- many the Iron Cross was on the soldier's breast before any recompense was broached for their leaders. In aristocratic England clumsy and unlovable as ever the leaders are rewarded extravagantly and the rank and file get nothing. If our oligarchy were honest in its intention of putting all classes on an equal footing, why have we not got rewards for other bodies of men that do not belong to a ruling-class institution, as in other countries. Where are the rewards for our policemen, our firemen, our railway officials ? Or are we still lying to ourselves that we are not a people to confer trumpery medals and crosses like foreigners because we only reserve them for a favoured class ! Or are we going to repeat the cant of the Times, in 1878, which expressed its " wonder " that a man of THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 195 Sir Henry Bessemer's eminence should complain that our authorities had dissuaded Napoleon III. from giving him the intended Grand Cordon of the Legion of Honour? What are we to say to the spirit of an oligarchy that allowed men like Darwin, Thackeray, Dickens, and many others, to live and die without a word of recognition from the State at most to be insulted by vile flattery at their death and immortalized by viler monuments ? Of course our commercial enterprise secured them an unhindered sale for their books; but not long ago our aristocracy thought it even an indignity to receive money for literary labour : witness Lord Byron. Countless others, who have benefited the community by their labour, have to wait for their death for a mite of recognition ; but none the less surprising is it when \ve note the ease with which members of aristo- cratic families gain power and distinction, not only in public life, but in every department of the public service. We need but cast a glance at the numerous peerages that are vested in one and the same family, and in many instances have been separately bestowed on younger members of powerful families. If we were honest instead of canting as usual, why, if we object to our countrymen receiving foreign decorations, do we allow our Court favourites to accept foreign Orders, even if they be Turkish emblems of imbecility ? Let us be true to ourselves at least, if we want to walk in Mr. Matthew 196 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Arnold's path of "sweetness and light," and let that delicate critic begin by setting us an example himself, instead of accepting a pension which would benefit half- a-dozen deserving but needy men. It is all very well for us to pooh-pooh foreigners for distributing Orders of personal distinction, and cant about leaving public and private opinion to reward civil deeds of usefulness, of daring, and of greatness. How did public opinion reward Waghorn, the pioneer of the overland route ? How should we have rewarded Lesseps had he been a middle-class Englishman? Perhaps placed him on a footing with our graceful alderman? Oh no, cant answers ; we do not believe in these gewgaw things : and yet our fountain of grace is more ridiculously over- flowing than that of any other monarchy, only it is showered forthwith true British cant, narrow-heartedn ess, and unsympathetic cold-blooded class selfishness. Even quite recently we have noticed the creation of two brand- new English Orders. We presume to laugh at foreigners for giving people their full titles, but do we not even the same as they ? * * If you get to know the limit of a man's mental range in Prussia, you can venture to assert boldly that such a man might be able to attain such and such a post in the public service, and no more. With us, intellectual power is a secondary affair altogether : given the required amount of self-assurance, and it is within the range of possibility that you may live to govern countries of greater territorial area than that of half the nations of Europe put together, or preside over a department the proper administration of which is of vital THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 197 VIII. Our amiable middle-class apostle of "sweetness and light " revels in dreams of " culture and anarchy," sows soft-sawdering heresy broadcast, and yet manages to handle a knife and fork side by side with a bishop. His interest stops short of the masses, and when he is invited to the East End of London by a noble-minded clergy- man, working hard to reclaim the poor by devoting his life to them, his exquisite barbarian tact prompts him to sneer at Christianity ! He shows the want of that tact which ought to be the essence of the very culture he pretends to inculcate the sense of harmony and of the fitness of things. Conservative W. H. Mallock asks " whether life is worth living," and well-dressed followers join him in answering the question in the affirmative by continuing to live. Such are our middle-class lights that affect to be dis- satisfied with the times we live in, and have not the courage to avow that middle-class cant is one of the factors that are answerable for so much that is deplorable in our existence. We can even turn to the clergy of the Established importance to the very existence of the empire ; but not only this, you will do it to the satisfaction, yea, even to the short-lived applause of our middle classes. CONVENTIONAL CANT. Church, if we desire to find honest sympathy with those that middle-class cant has done so much to isolate and to crush. There, as elsewhere, we find that splendid individualism which revolts against what it holds to be wrong and cruel, and by its revolt only throws a lurid light on everything that is ugly in our midst For as the power of a blow may be tested by the strength of the recoil, so the mass of our entangled cobweb of un- savoury idiosyncrasies and follies connected therewith may be measured by the glorious instances of individual rebellion and struggle against them, with which the history of our land is studded as with lustrous diamonds. We meet self-sacrificing heroism and genius in all civilized communities, but the unselfish genius of philan- thropy has brighter examples perhaps among us than in all the world put together. If that be true, some would credit our laissez-faire development with it, but we prefer to think that though it may not be entirely unconnected with the form of our political and social development, that is more an accusation thereof than an encomium. We prefer to think that it is caused by there being no- where such need for it, and there being nowhere so splendid a race that could have risen to the height of so many occasions. Not only may it be fearlessly stated that no country in the world has hitherto (America's chance has yet to come) produced such a cluster of individuals who THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 199 have devoted their thoughts and their lives to the attainment of happiness for their fellow-creatures, but in no country in the world has each class produced such instances of self-denial, of self-sacrifice and devo- tion to a broader humanity as we have. When we have stated this much, and when it has been proved that we have still understated the case in treating of our time especially we can repeat almost the same assertion with regard to our women. What must be the power of the counter-influences that have nullified so much of our best effort ! Baron Holtzendorf, in his social and political sketches, besides pointing with admiration to our many instances of enlightened and noble clerical individualism, also refers in glowing terms to the bright array of female philanthropists we possess. Women like Florence Nightingale, Mary Carpenter, Mrs Meredith, of the Nine-Elms Prison Mission, Octavia and Florence Hill, Helen Taylor, and many others are rare in any country. With us they are indirect though unerring proof of the existence of deep-seated misery and degradation that have called forth such noble efforts to relieve them. Further on Baron Holtzendorf refers to men like the Rev. Mr. Vincent, of Norwich, the late Bishop Fraser, of Manchester,- and many others, with the remark that it would be difficult to find such independence of thought, such initiative, such bold individualism in any hierarchy 200 CONVENTIONAL CANT. save our own. This is a testimony to the race and an indictment of the forced conditions of its existence. For it is but natural that the cry for help should come from those most qualified by their position to know the extent of the ills they war against. How different is such action from the weak attempt of the Archbishop of Canterbury to take the wind out of the sails of rampant Salvationism, to succeed only in advertising whilst estranging it As stated above, it is not one class or even one sex to whom our individualism is confined, but to every section of the community. The aristocracy, whose power is bound up with the possession of land, just as the woe and degradation of the masses are con- nected with the impossibility of its acquisition, this aristocracy has also always produced champions for a popular cause, and thus shielded the class from the reproach of any selfish proceeding of its more recalcitrant majority. Here, again, we have that individualism, without which our aristocracy could never have ridden the storms of modern convulsions. Even at the present moment, when we see a majority holding on to the solid remnants of a mighty political lever slipping from its grasp, we also see numberless instances of voluntary reductions of rent, besides even more tangible and noble proofs of honest conviction leading men to steer a course visibly in direct opposition to their own class THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. interest. The want of that spirit of enlightened un- selfish individualism among the German and French aristocracy has been one of the causes of their downfall, and their present non-existence as a great political power. IX. It is not our intention to draw up a long list of Eng- land's men of genius, and exult on our supremacy over others in the possession of a Shakespeare, a Newton, a Clive, a Watts, or a Stephenson : our Pharisees are not likely to lose sight of that Our aim in dwelling on our individualism is to point to that form of heroic rebellion against the ugliness and cruel working of our conditions of life, that more than anything else prove their exist- ence. Of course, we already hear the voice of cant ex- claim, " Is not our individualism a direct outcome of our glorious laissez-faire principle, which allows the strong and good in the community to work itself out for the benefit of all ? " Yes, good friends, it is the result in the same sense as the heroism of the policeman facing the armed burglar is the direct result of the murderous instincts of the latter. But how about the case, if the race did not produce that heroism ? Fortunately it does, but not as a "result" of our cant, or of any of its illusory theories and applications. We have dwelt OH this point elsewhere, but we may state that these are 302 CONVENTIONAL CANT. instances of individualism which can have little connec- tion with any real or imaginary principle of government, but which are rather the direct outcome of the " hardness of race " which has triumphed over obstacles under con- ditions that would have swamped any less hard-fibred people. Thus, without blindly swearing by a laissez-faire fetish, or by an iron centralization, with all our hopes for the future based on the greatness of the Anglo-Saxon race, assisted and guided by the dawn of the spirit of enlightenment and culture, we pass on to the suggestion of some remedies. Unfortunately, " We mistake men's diseases," says Richard Baxter, " when we think there needeth nothing to cure them of their errors but the evidences of truth. Alas ! there are many distempers of mind to be removed before they receive that evidence." But Ruskin adds : " Nevertheless, when it is fully laid before them, my duty will be done. Conviction will follow in due course." In the mean time the glorious individualism to be found among all classes will assist us, and augurs well for the splendid possibilities of the future. Lastly, let us ask to what our idiosyncrasies, with their crop of vagaries and fallacies, with their bacillus- like tenacity, point ? Are they the parasites naturally congenial to our organism, and therefore without marked influence on its THE RESULTS AND REVOLT. 203 vitality, or are they of mushroom growth, born and bred of the miasma of temporary mental sloth and unclean- liness, and only to be cast out by a process of fumigation, compared to which the fumes of our London chimney- pots are as the curling vapours of a red-Indian's peaceful pipe? Is this fumigation if such a process be necessary to be violent in its character, thickened by the blood of a hundred thousand men, or is it all to be worked out peacefully by the aid of the grinning aphorism of laissez-faire, cantingly called the " survival of the fittest " ? Are gush, hysteria, reeking and rising from the Pontine marshes of our selfishness, to breed as hitherto their epileptic product, while we continue to hide our heads in the sand and call our neighbours to admire the only visible parts of our persons, or are we drifting Heaven knows we are not steering towards a cata- clysm, out of which a new life, born of a new morality, shall bid us regard the past as a hideous nightmare ? A later generation may be able to answer this, as it may safely be trusted to answer many other questions. We can but see the ills we suffer from, and crave indul- gence for our optimism and presumption in venturing to point to some remedies. CHAPTER IX. REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. " Begone, and make place for better men." CROMWELL. "We are told that this country is the paradise of the rich; it should be our task to see that it does not become the purgatory of the poor. It should be our task to strive, each according to his opportunity, to leave the world a little better than he found it." J. CHAMBERLAIN, Spswich, Jan. 14, 1885. I. IT has been a thankless task to dwell at length on cant and on some of its deplorable results, the more so as the latter are so palpable and self-evident from the moment the widespread existence of the idosyncrasy itself has been fairly demonstrated. Let us, in conclusion, turn to the outlook, the hope for the future, the remedy. The outlook seems tolerably clear before us, and, taken all round, may well fill us with hope for the future. The ways and means, the influences at work wherewith our hopes are to be worked out, are not so easily to be denned and described, however keenly it may be felt to REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 205 be the only way out of the present state of things ; for where ills are complex, the work of recovery must be many-sided and various. As our pharisaic cant is largely mixed up with our endeavour to make ourselves and others believe we are better than we really are, so the first stage on the road to recovery will be to get rid of this tendency. We must endeavour to become humble without being unduly self-depreciatory. It is not the humility of affectation we require, but rather the earnest humility of the Puritans of old, which did not for one moment hinder them from keeping their powder dry, whilst they bowed their heads in earnest interpretation of biblical texts. We must strive to gain self-knowledge, or what the Germans call Selbsterkenntniss self-insight Not that we suffer from want of knowledge ; far from that ; we are learning almost too precipitately, before our mental digestion is able to assimilate the matter. We try to seize too many ideas, and bestow too little attention on the cultivation and hardening of character. It is one of the great defects of our education of youth in the present day, that we place too much importance on the receptivity of ideas and not on the development of character, which would greatly help us to appreciate and to utilize our learning. In a partial reversal of this order of things will be found one feature of hope for the future. 206 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Our Pitts, Foxes, Dundases, were splendid characteristic animals, the descendants of whom we can see lounging in the bow-windows of Brooke's or Boodle's during the London season. But they rule us no longer. Our dominant spirits in the past ruled largely by force of character. Men like Cromwell, Pitt, and even Canning, were all character ; but then they were not weighted by having to pander to a canting middle class in alliance with a leviathan press. Their sympathies, at least those of Pitt and Canning, might not have fitted them to deal with the grievances of the present day, but they will ever remain splendid instances of the force of character. And it is to force of character, whether shown by one man towering above his fellows, or by an earnest com- munity of men, that we must also look for salvation in the future. II. England is no ground for Utopian social remedies ; the common sense of the nation will always be proof against them. But it is no Utopian wish that the influence of the metropolitan leviathan press and its hysterical hangers-on may decrease, even if that of the more sober and honest provincial press increase in proportion. One of the grandest clap-trap phrases of our cant is, that our press is our great educator, and it is a most disastrous lie. A press may be an educator in a back- REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 207 ward community ; but a daily press like ours is certainly an instrument of general stupefaction in any community which has reached a certain stage of primary education. We say " our " press, for we can imagine " a " press that might fulfil an educating mission far beyond our ex- perience hitherto. But such a press would be a very different one from "our" press. It would have to be, first of all, less ambitious, less hypocritical, more like a part of our provincial press more honest, more unas- suming. But, above all, it would have to be less jovine, less infallible, less impertinent, less hypocritically anony- mous. We want a press to help to keep awake our better nature, to point more to the beauties of existence, to quicken our perceptions of what is refining and worth living for, instead of endeavouring to keep us in a per- petual state of unhealthy unrest. We do not want our press to tell us blindly whom to worship : it has made hideous blunders in endeavouring to do so ; but it can assist us to discern for ourselves, to weigh for our- selves whom and what we are to pin our taith to. We want no dictatorial organs of public opinion let our chosen best men, calmly assembled, represent our public opinion ; we do not want the policy of this world-em- pire, hysterically influenced overnight by ambiguous rags hawked about the metropolis of an evening at so many copies for a shilling, and vomiting forth cant and gush in the name of patriotism and morality. 208 CONVENTIONAL CANT. And yet such is daily the case with us, and no more striking exemplification of its perniciousness can well be imagined than the fact that, whilst every nine out of ten persons are ready to admit the viciousness of a great part of our press influence, no public man dare come forward and say so ! Like men floating along a rapid current, they know it is only wasting strength to try to swim against it, besides risking personal discomfiture, if not annihilation ! Yes, what a power this fourth estate wields. Only to think what it must be when we know that the heir to the throne considers it policy to invite some of its most vulgar representatives as guests to his house. What he must suffer ! It is a case for pitying. Oh, duties of wealth and station J But there are some that stand on the banks and can afford to call out to the seething, struggling mass of humanity which they see hurrying on to the main, that the evil is a real and a serious one, though our insular position and a certain hardness of the national character have hitherto preserved us from some of its most disastrous results. Let our press scribes sign their articles. Let us every morning before breakfast, on an empty stomach, but with a clear head, distinctly understand that these leading effusions are the hastily crystallized emanations of a small unknown coterie of commercial men, banded together for purposes of self-interest and commercial success. Let it be distinctly understood that these men meet REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 209 nightly with the praiseworthy regularity of every other body of salaried commercial workers; that they are bound to accept the password of the chief, like every other commercial staff, and are told off to do their work regularly and mechanically, like any other paid workmen. Let it be distinctly understood that these commercial ventures have their gas bill to pay, their paper and ink bill to settle, to keep their Walter presses well oiled and greased, etc., long before they can strike out and thunder at us in the name of the interests of an empire on which the sun never sets ! Let us rid ourselves of the cant of a mercenary press; almost every paper is mercenary in a sense. Let the silly many-headed of the middle class once seize these facts, and they will be ashamed of themselves for bowing down to a shibboleth of clay. Gradually they will turn to other standards to form their judgments on matters social and political. Fortunately we are not in want of something better to turn to : the English race has produced prototypes enough : luminous examples in every department of thought and action to look up to and live by. Only let cant enable us to recognize them. To profit by their teaching, so that we may learn to think for ourselves humbly, but earnestly, so that it may assist us to see our way for ourselves, or at all events without blindly accepting the conclusions our press gives us cut and dried on every imaginable subject, is not the p CONVENTIONAL CANT. work of a day, or of a year ; but it is to be done, and must be done nevertheless. Only we must set to work about it without cant; we must rid ourselves of that enemy first. And there is no time to lose, for gradually, but surely as the rising tide, there are elements coming to the fore that laugh at our fond crotchets, that care not for the editorial "we" which has crushed all independent thought out of us ; elements that know little religion as we understand religion, but even less cant ; ele- ments that are in earnest, and whose thoughts are filled with menaces which might be rendered by the well- known French saying, Ote toi de Id, que je nfy mette. Among these new elements are men who, as Bishop Fraser, of Manchester, once eloquently said in com- menting on the heroic conduct of some miners, " prac- tise true religion, whilst we are only preaching it." We must begin to realize that the gigantic commercial suc- cess of our press is not an unmixed blessing, but in many ways a curse a weapon in the service of cant ; a wall that hinders us from seeing ahead. Such is in reality the power we bow down to and worship. Let us get the better of this state of things and we shall be another step up the ladder of hope for the future. Our provincial press, with its comparative sobriety of tone, with its comparative emancipation from governing class influence, with its comparative emancipation from REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 211 the ambitious legal clique that so largely influences our leading London journals, supplies us with some hope in a desirable direction. Yes, to clip the power of our preponderant press, by learning to discern its true nature, is the first step to disestablish cant and pave the way to raise the moral and mental tone of the com- munity at large ; particularly to raise the poorer portions thereof, those most in want of light and truth. It would seem as though the time were near at hand, too, if we take some crazy indications in that direction as signs of healthier action to follow. But our people want none of Mr. Matthew Arnold's " Sweetness and Light ; " they want honester and sterner stuff. Neither do they want a canting propaganda of the equality of all men, the clap-trap " same flesh and blood " phrase. That idea is practically impossible as it is theoretically ridiculous. III. It is necessary, for the healthy advancement of the community at large, that the position of the classes of culture and refinement should be recognized and receive their due of consideration and respect; but not at the expense of the rights of others; not by means of class legislation, brought about by the selfish cant of a ruling minority. It should be our aim to be as happy as we can in the world we are placed in, for the purpose of CONVENTIONAL CANT. seeking our happiness, but not at the expense of others. There are predominant and favoured classes more or less everywhere : true equality seems as impossible among individuals, as it undoubtedly is among nations and races, be they republics or monarchies. But it should be the task of our teachers and our legislators, without indulging in Utopian hopes and dreams, to clip the power of class pretensions where they contain a wrong or injustice towards the weaker, though the greater number. This can be done without wrong to the minority. We do not say it can be done without "loss" to the minority; we contend it can be done without " wrong; " but "loss " of what we have no right to arrogate to ourselves is not necessarily synonymous with " wrong." A cabinet minister (Mr. Chamberlain, Birmingham, June 3, 1885) tells us, " I do not believe that any Liberal policy, mine or any other, will ever take away the security which property rightly enjoys that it will ever destroy the certainty that industry and thrift will meet with their due reward ; but I do think that something may be done to enlarge the obligation and responsibility of the whole community towards its poorer and less fortunate members." Many will re-echo this sentiment; and, fortunately, things have come to such a pass, notwithstanding middle- class cant and journalistic time-serving, that our governing REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 213 classes are ready to grant almost anything, provided we will accept it from them and allow them to continue as the sole fountain of grace and dispensers of patronage. We repeat we look for no Utopian millennium ; we only want what others have already got, without the disadvan- tages which unfavourable circumstances have hitherto denied to them. And when both the governing parties in the State have exhausted their efforts of ousting each other by concessions to popular clamour, we shall get what we want; not so much by virtue of Acts of Parliament, as by emancipating ourselves from cant and utilizing political power, which will be of little good till that is accomplished. We need not care whether it be a Chamberlain, a Gladstone, a Hartington, or even a Salisbury or Churchill that assists us to break the power for evil of our vested interests. Nor need we care what classes assist us in the work. If the classes that put " respectability " first and the happiness of their fellow-men only afterwards ; if these classes will not lead in the van, we must look to those who place the solidarity of their fellow-creatures above every other consideration. The Germans did not at first expect their national aspirations to be realized by a Bismarck. But we do not want national unification; disunion has never been our national mis- fortune, as it has ever been the curse of the Germans ; we want amalgamation, assimilation of our different CONVENTIONAL CANT. classes, and debrutalization of our poorer classes. We want to lower the gaudy ruling-class top of our edifice (not our harmless royalty, whose power for good exceeds its power for harm), and cleanse the basement of the building. We want that harmonious blending and sym- pathy, among ourselves at least, which we have always been unable to attain among the subject races we rule over. We want to produce a greater number of a type already referred to in our Introduction as being some- thing more than the mere ruling-class gentleman a type that will no longer be narrowed in sympathy to its own class, but will feel restless at enjoying advantages purchased at the cost of the degradation of others. It is likely that mankind will never agree as to the best form of government, though the choice narrow itself between a strong centralized authority and a divided decentralized one. But on one question we may hope to see the world agree one day, namely that, in the interests of the many, the aristocratic class oligarchy of a few, in possession of the land, foully worshipped by a clergy in alliance with the middle classes, and sailing under the canting flag of popular government, is about the worst ! The change from all this will be complex and many- sided, but come it must, whether gradually or with com- parative suddenness. The alteration of our feudal land REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 215 laws, the reform of the House of Lords, the disestablish- ment of a Church that has ignominously failed to do its work, the removal of its representatives from the Upper House, a cheapening and simplification of civil law, and, lastly, a " discantation" of society at large, these are some of the items that will help us to a higher and healthier level ; these are some of the items that will raise our masses and give them more self-respect, a greater sense of the dignity and value of life, however humble its sphere. These are no wild Utopian dreams, for the leading continental nations have already got the reality ; they have almost all got what we shall have to fight hard for. IV. Baron vom Stein, the regenerator of Prussia, at the beginning of this century already recognized the danger of the rights of property in land being pushed to the extent of constituting a wrong to the community at large. He initiated measures to bring the laws relating to land property more in accordance with the spirit of the age, and the revolution of 1848, particularly in South Ger- many, consummated reform in that direction all over Germany. France we need not dwell on ; the French Revolution of 1789 settled that question violently, and to-day we see the land in the hands of a peasantry 216 CONVENTIONAL CANT. who form the backbone of security for peace in the country. In France, eighteen millions of acres of land are owned by two and a half millions of people ; in England, the same number of acres are owned by 4217 people ! The reform of the House of Lords would only give it the representative character which it lacks, and which the Herren-Haus in Prussia and Austria and the Senate in France enjoy. That it should have greater power than they have has long enough been our curse. With regard to a simplification and reform of our civil laws, to bring them into harmony with our times, it is scarcely necessary to assert that other nations have long had that boon. With regard to ridding ourselves of cant, we cannot unfortunately find an exact precedent elsewhere to draw deductions from. It is our own insular speciality, and we believe the main cause of our not yet enjoying those blessings which other communities already enjoy. For if cant had ever allowed us to see things as they are, we may assume we should have put our shoulder to the wheel ere this to fashion things as they ought to be. These things will not be given to us, we must work for them and earn them. Yes, as before said, not from Acts of Parliament alone can we expect better things, unless they go hand in hand with the disestablishment of a greater enemy than our worst laws, that blinder of our better-self, our lying to REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 217 ourselves, our sincere insincerity, our cant, that vilest pair of coloured-glasses ever clapped on eyes of mortal. The middle classes have had their chance since the first Reform Bill, and missed it Let the masses now have theirs. In the words of Dickens, " the ' great gen- teel ' have made such a mess of things, that ' the great vulgar ' can't do worse." As the middle classes have proved themselves unequal to the task and incapable of unselfishness or enthusiasm, let us try the masses and see whether they can improve on their predecessors; either directly by their own action, or indirectly by dis- cerning a true hero, or a constellation of heroes, to do it . for them. If noble individualism alone could do the work, men like Sir Samuel Romilly and Lord Hatherley would have already done for civil law what they did for our criminal law. The canting solidarity of legal class power has hitherto prevented that from being accomplished. Men like Maurice, Charles Kingsley, Dean Stanley, Dean Alford, Bishop Fraser, would have enabled our Church to embrace the elements so long standing . outside its influence, if individualism alone could help us. But we must still look to our individualism ; it is one of the noblest signs of what our race is capable. But we must be clean of cant in order to recognize and assist its efforts, to meet it half-way with the shield of earnest- ness and honest sympathy. Yes, we may well be proud 2i8 CONVENTIONAL CANT. of the glorious names of those who have from time to time devoted their life energies to the endeavour to rescue us from darkness, notwithstanding Henry Thomas Buckle's chilling conclusions, that the work of the indi- vidual means nothing beyond an irresponsible indirec- tion of influences that laugh at personal effort. But Henry Thomas Buckle was essentially a product of the middle classes, of those who discovered that the sum of human happiness consisted in being able to buy in the cheapest and to sell in the dearest market ; a colossus in conscientious work and grasp of detail, but without ima- gination, without sentiment, with a weak heart. Even the Pooley episode only evinced a certain sentiment by its animus. Such men as Buckle cannot assist us much, for, having devoted their lives to get rid of sentiment, because they now and then discover it to be unhealthy and false, they have lost sight of the fact that, after all, sentiment is a great factor in the problem of our happi- ness. The chief aim is to be influenced by healthy and true sentiment. Let us have no more ridiculous journal- istic waving of Jove's thunderbolt. Let us recognize the sawdust running out of Jove's ugly stitched-up car- case. Let us re-echo Dante's words, " guarda e passa." Let us be strong enough to look and pass on to better things. REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 219 v. A wave of sympathy with the masses is passing over us. Men like Dean Stanley, Kingsley, and others, taken up by royalty, have set a noble example, and the idea has filtered into the canting middle classes. But what was honest, even noble in its origin, becomes vitiated in the process of filtration. The purest spring water is the soonest tainted ; what purity of thought could pass through our middle classes and remain undefiled ? They have shown what noble ideas mean when worked out by them. They result in our sham charities, in their endea- vour to identify themselves with the wants of those beneath them. We have been working from the top, or, at best, from the surface. We must come to work from beneath the surface. We must start from the basement of the social edifice, from underground, from the very earth we all spring from and go back to from the land question. We have been working from "without," we must begin to work from " within," whilst gladly accept- ing all honest co-operation from without, from above. To undo the harm of generations of cant and wrong it will take generations. But we hope to live to see a beginning, a start. We are gradually sending our masses to the picture galleries, into the parks of the great. No wonder they now and then give just cause of complaint by their bad 220 CONVENTIONAL CANT. behaviour, as in the case of Lord Essex ; they are yet too unaccustomed to privileges which have long been the birthright of their fellows in other countries. We are in the midst of an Exhibition mania ; we are raising the artistic taste of the multitude. Officious busybodies, trading on the goodwill of royalty, feel the divine mission of spreading culture over the land. The whole affair becomes a gigantic shop for the benefit of a few privileged licencees and of the different railway com- panies at the expense of the metropolitan taxpayer. No, all this is of little good. We must cleanse our hearts and wash our hands, and then we shall soon see that such efforts alone will not help us far. And we shall come to see more clearly. We are becoming honester than we were, for the sterling qualities of the race are gradually asserting themselves, and have already slowly insisted on and gained a reform of laws which, shaped by a callous governing class, were till lately a premium on dishonesty. Well may we hope for a people that grew great under our land- and civil laws. It is the fashion, both at home and abroad, to say that England has seen her best days, to hint at Holland or Rome as fitting comparisons. We, on the contrary, believe that Eng- land's day has yet to come, and that it will come as soon as we choke cant. We want no temperance, nor Salvation crazes ; they will only defer our salvation. They are not manifesta- REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. tions of the true spirit of Christianity, but simply an out- come of the blind fanatic narrow spirit of Old Testament Judaism, whose God was the avenging Jehovah, Adonai. We want no more of that spirit. Let our spiritual teachers, of whatever denomination, whether they hold forth in the gorgeous Gothic tabernacle, or of a Sunday evening in our parks and streets, let them cease to revile our instincts and degrade humanity by their morbid reflections on our lusts and passions. They have tried this long enough without bringing us nearer to salvation. Let them point to the beauty of life, if properly under- stood, and to the merit of finding our happiness in realiz- ing that life can be made worth living in every walk of it, however humble and lowly. The true life-giving instincts of Christianity are still to be found in our midst, not in the dogmatical casuistries of our theologians they never possessed them but in the strata unaffected by such as they. To strengthen and to ^elevate these instincts must now be our task. The true heroism of our race not its savagery that indomitable hardness of nerve, which has ever enabled us to fight on in the battle of life when others have despaired and been vanquished ; these are the qualities that supply us with matter for congratulation and for hope. We should be surprised if any Englishman could hear of a wreck at sea, where the captain perishes with his vessel ; of a mining accident, where volunteers crowd 222 CONVENTIONAL CANT. to the rescue ; of a life-boat's crew dashing through the breakers in a winter's night, without feeling his bosom swell at the thought of being an Englishman. There is no Pharisaism in this, it is a bit of true, honest human nature. Why, even the savagery of our people is not without its redeeming features, for the English race is the only one that, even in its roughest, lowliest type, has the sense of fair-play, and disdains to strike an antagonist when he is down. The word " fair- play " even has no synonym in any other language. What race in the world has produced a body of men taken from the humblest ranks, like our police force, a member of which, single-handed and unarmed, will face an armed burglar, yes, even throw and capture him. These remarks are not intended as a sop to Cerberus, or a glorification of the uncultured at the expense of the cultured, but merely to point with hope to the innate noble instincts of a race, when freed from cant and the meanness that is its direct outcome. For it is not con- science alone, but mainly cant that " maketh cowards of us all." VI. Our aptitude for organization and united effort is another of our national characteristics that furnish us with hope. Need we compare the work done by our minor officials, whether soldiers, sailors, policemen, ra ; l- REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 223 way, Post-office, Foreign-office officials, or others, with the unsatisfactory performances of the favoured-privileged class individuals that invariably direct their efforts ? A splendid race, indeed, that could produce such men under such disadvantageous conditions. The organiza- tion of our trade-unions, of some of our advanced elec- torates, the effacement of the individual before the common interests to be achieved, are, notwithstanding their drawbacks, all instances in point of that indomitable hardness of race which bids us believe that it will win in the end. And yet there are many among us who turn with disgust from the organization of the masses. But more wonderful still, these very people pooh-pooh the strong man too. These doctrinaires delight in our being ruled by Micawber-orators in alliance with gush and with 'other unhealthy instincts of the hour. Walter Bagehot may be quite right in saying it would not be desirable to have more talent in our representative bodies,but he omits to say that we could do with a little more character and a great deal less class egotism. If so, we must seek to develop character and strike a blow at class egotism, which is none the less a curse though it is often found in conjunction with great individual unselfishness and generosity. If we have lost faith in our power to do good, we must strive for knowledge in order that we may regain faith. 224 CONVENTIONAL CANT. There is no better road to knowledge than that which opens up to our perception how wretched is our present state. We must endeavour to realize what dreadful canting bunglers the oracles are from whom we have taken our cue supreme, among them our daily papers. That done, things will broaden out before our vision, and gradually assume shape in their true light and pro- portions. We shall perceive that our governing classes must be credited with many of the finest characters, not only in English history, but in the history of the world. But we shall also perceive that, whenever they have shown an antagonism to the special interests of their class, they have either had to bend, or have been crushed : witness Sir Robert Peel. But it is not our intention to dwell further on this matter than to emphasize that we must endeavour to check the class egotism of our age. The individual shall retain the lustre of his father's exploits, but no privileges. The achievements of the father must be an incentive to the son, and not go to make his life a privileged sinecure. This means that we must abolish the hereditary character of our lawgivers, or at least modify it. We must disestablish not only the Church, and lay hold upon the national funds now in its hands, and see they are rationally utilised, but we must also extirpate the toadying, fawning spirit of our time. We must begin to have a word to say with regard REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 225 to the curriculum of our public schools, and to inquire into their working under clerical don influence, as we have now and then inquired into the working of our public baths, and wash-, and work-houses. Our narrow classical education-^for it has never been classical in the broad enlightened sense, instead of being a refining influence has become a hindrance to our recognizing the wants of the age. Our sucking senators, imbued with the achievements of Cicero and Caesar, suffer from a species of vocal diarrhoea, and fancy they are address- ing a Roman audience, whereas they are invariably talking to a set of men imbued with less ideality than an average rat. The possession of land by the masses would not produce a millennium, but the greater division of land would do away with the ridiculous social prestige attached to its possession, and thus tend to level the different classes. It would tend to weaken the influence of the wealthy at elections, and help to strip our executive of its narrow class character. We will spend twenty millions on our navy, but we do not want our privileged classes to direct the spending of it. We sneer at the foul place-hunting and corruption of American politicians. Let us look among ourselves. There is hardly a parvenu among us who is possessed of a large income that could not force himself into our legislative assembly and lay down the law in the name Q 226 CONVENTIONAL CANT. of the traditions of the Conquest, and all for the sake of social recognition and distinction. We must endeavour to train ourselves to look upon character as a true aristocratic distinction, and vulgar self- seeking as a thing to smile on and to pity ! We have not yet come to that, for our senatorial vulgarians pose before us in all their glaring and gaudy arrogance. Let us hope we may disestablish this sort of thing, and the sooner the better. American politicians go in for place and its pecuniary emoluments ; our middle classes go in for social recog- nition : only our aristocratic younger sons go in for the cash emoluments of place. We all aspire to what we do not possess, and it ought to be our care to see that the getting of it does not take place at the expense of the well-being and health of the community. But it does at present, and cant is the coloured glass that prevents our seeing that it is so. VII. We are told our advanced statesmen are setting class " against " class. What have we been doing hitherto but persistently setting class " above " class ; keeping class "from "class; estranging where we might have assimi- lated and welded together in the common interests of enlightened humanity. REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION". 227 Our cant-ridden doctrinaires prevent us from seeing that we are not likely to be assisted to abolish the abuses of a class with the concurrence of that class, but only in spite of its opposition. This truth we must grasp firmly, and by its assistance see through the sophisms of those who are ever endeavouring to divert our eyes from the main issue. For instance, while the House of Commons is being befooled by endless dis- cussions as to oaths and affirmations three hundred interminable pensions are being quietly commuted. Did the public stop to inquire " whence this haste ? " Did it perceive that all this panic, the opposition to affirmation, was the result of the deliberate determination of one low-born man to propose the abolition of one of the most scandalous abuses even this aristocratic country can boast of? We think not. Did the Prussians make their army what it is with the help of crotchetty doctrinaires or mouthing Parliamen- tarians ? Did the French break the power of the feudal landlords with their concurrence ? Surely not ; but cant asks us to believe that we shall get privileged human nature to vote cheerfully for the extinction of all that it clings to. We who expect lawyers to assist us to make their profession less lucrative, less like the character of a bird of prey on the public, we may well ask whether the parliamentary interest of the legal profession would ever 228 CONVENTIONAL CANT. have produced the Code Napoleon by gradual evolution, by seeking the aid and advice of a majority of those whose interest it was to leave well alone. Did the Americans get their magnificent Constitution by the gradual evolvement of precedent, by the unerring instinct of universal suffrage ? or was it the work of strong men; in fact, of such strong men that even universal suffrage and the vile vulgarity of a money-crazy age have been unable to move a stone of its foundation ? Let us bear this in mind, and we shall have to admit that we must look for salvation too from strong and good men ; whether from one single man or a set of men it is all the same. Better be many, so that there be some left standing to take the place of him who falls. It is the vilest middle-class cant to inveigh against " one man rule : " the great thing is to be ruled by the best, the most righteous, whether they be twelve apostles, or one Saviour. Such men as we are in want of would soon teach us to cleanse our hearts of that foul fetish, laissez-faire. They would teach us to take the initiative seriously and earnestly to produce a greater amount of happiness for the greatest number than has been attainable hitherto ; not by organizing sham Exhibitions, and driving our masses into them like sheep, but by spreading technical and scientific education far and wide to enable us to fight the battle of life under better conditions than REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 229 hitherto. Instead of squandering our money by millions in putting down Asiatic railways and pulling them up again, we want technical education spread by means of these millions of money, if need be. We want influences to reach our lower classes that will give them more self-respect, more sobriety, more cleanliness, more contentment, more happiness. We want to make a stand and undo some of the dreadful harm that an unfettered working out of the " survival of the strongest " has wrought among us. As, next to riches, we worship strength, so also, next to poverty, the greatest crime with us is weakness. If you want to do away with the drunkenness and excessive misery of the poor, change your method of dealing with them. Take the first step to break down the class barrier that makes poverty almost a crime, by giving them a chance of gradually gaining self-respect. Instead of prating about only the poor entering the kingdom of God, give the poor a better chance of living in this world. Educate the women of the working classes to cook, to come up at least to the standard of the same classes in other nations ; that is surely no optimistic expectation or wish. Drop the cant of your charity, and try more and more to put the object of your philanthropy beyond the necessity of appealing to it. The foul leasehold system and its corollary the CONVENTIONAL CANT. jerry builder are answerable for much of the hideous indignity of our masses. We must take a bold initiative and exercise control, direct and assist where we have hitherto callously only looked on and praised the Lord for our virtue of non- interference with His decrees. We have ridden long enough through the night on the dirty broomstick of " Freedom of Contract," " Liberty of the Subject," " Non- interference ; " it is high time to interfere. The United States have only just shown us how to interfere with the Socialistic Anarchy : we must take the initiative now in dealing with avoidable misery and its principal cause cant In other words, we must rid ourselves of all sham, so that we may see clearly ; and be sure that, whatever way we wander republican, monarchical, or oligarchical we are at least able to read the names of the stations on the road, and feel sure that honesty of purpose is our companion and guide. Our country is literally covered with charitable institu- tions, friendly societies, and trusts for the poor. The funds at their disposal are fabulous, and yet the State exercises hardly any control over their administration, which is largely in the hands of the clergy. Here is a chance of dealing a blow at cant ; but it must not be a blow in the dark. We are told these are continental ideas and will not work with us ! Of course not, but cant does not tell us why ? Because there are too many REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 231 interests at stake that are determined they shall not work. The German nobility were determined that citizens should not be allowed to bid for great land holdings ; the Kings of Prussia were determined they should, and with one blow decided a question against which the whole aristocracy of England might have fought successfully for generations if circumstances had brought such a question forward with us. Thus we want some forcible remedies to be struck with one blow, like a bright gold sovereign fresh from the Mint. We want the penal laws against perjury to be recoined, to be struck anew, bright and capable of instant healthy, unimpeded circulation. We want it to be distinctly understood that perjury is the foul sister of forgery, that it is a felony involving the felon's cell and the felon's doom. When the character of this respectable crime and its consequences are duly recognized and realized, then we must look about for reliable men to inquire into the administration of our Charitable Trusts and Friendly Societies. Cant smiles and thinks of the utter failure of our attempt at instituting a public prosecutor. Yes, it was a failure, the whole legal profession was dead against the idea, and it was doomed to failure. But it ought to have succeeded ; it was a move in the right direction, and it must eventually succeed if the influences at work on the side of darkness are to be overcome. We are a long 232 CONVENTIONAL CANT. way off yet, and no wonder; but we shall be much nearer if we once clearly realize where we are. Let us realize, for instance, that a poor man among us cannot plead his cause however plausible in the higher courts, unless he can furnish security for the excessive costs of appli- cation, let alone security for more, that are as sure to follow as sneezing follows the too close proximity to the onion. When we can trust ourselves to treat perjury as it deserves, then we can revise the laws respecting injurious adulteration of victuals. When we have protected the masses from wholesale fraud, we will protect them from wholesale poisoning. Not from motives of sentimental philanthropy will we do so, but from a stern sense of duty to our fellow-men. As we are not likely to find the germs of such action in the breast of our self-seeking middle classes, we would advise the sending over of a commission to Prussia to inquire and examine into the working of the modus operandi over there, in dealing with adulteration. Act on that, and it will suffice. When our masses are able to get unadulterated victuals, it will be time to look forward to the day when their women will gradually learn how to use them sensibly and economically. Perhaps then a little more light will have cast its rays over their life, bringing cleanliness, self- respect, and with it comparative sobriety. For let there be no mistake about one thing, namely, that our masses REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 233 drink from want of self-respect, from despair ! It is a lie that they axe forced to drink by our climate, as it is a delusion to think that salvational or soberer preaching will ever eradicate it. No, pointing to another world will never stop vice among us ; shedding light over this world alone can help us. VIII. Let us, then, hope some day will dawn on us when, despite all difference of means, even the humblest can find some enjoyment in his own healthy sphere of life. We indulge in no fantastic dreams ; we want to see in the land of our birth a little of that harmless enjoyment of life we have witnessed in other climes. We wish to see those most in want of a little recreation assisted by the State to attain it Let us remove the restrictions against harmless amusements, let music, dancing, the theatre, properly controlled ay, even subsidised by the State help to lead our masses gradually to a healthier, happier level. It can be done ; it is done elsewhere. A new spirit will gradually dawn upon us, we shall discard our sawdust idols. We shall come to revere honesty and intellect before mere glamour and brute force. We shall come to recognize and distinguish between those that rule us for their own ends and those that wish us well in the interests of broad humanity Thus we must centre all our efforts on reform at home. 234 CONVENTIONAL CANT. Foreign politics, as hitherto, can only bring us a continua- tion of the daily disaster and disgrace we have witnessed for years. Our best plan might be, as it would have been long ago, to hold on to Germany, the great nation from which we partly spring, and with whose interests our own nowhere collide; Germany, the nation that most appreciates all that is good and noble among and in us : our poets, our thinkers, our men of science, our energy, and our history of courageous effort and battle. Let our diplomatic representatives abroad imitate those of Prussia, who not only attend to court duties and the daily routine of official life, but enter into the spirit of commercial enterprise of their country, and back up the interests of their humblest citizens by word and deed. Perhaps some day we shall think there is something to be said for universal compulsory military service to guard us against our periodical scares of foreign invasion. If we, then, adopt some plan on the Swiss system, we shall find that the habits of military discipline, obedience, and duty are worth having, although they are not to be found in the catechism of laissez-faire. By that time our Radicals may have rid themselves of their silly sympathy with the Latin races with whom we have no sentiment in common, except the self-interest of leaving one another alone. In the mean time we would say to our middle classes, " Go down on your knees and pray that you may be REMEDY, AND CONCLUSION. 235 endowed with a little honest enthusiasm ; that you may become honestly earnest, or earnestly honest ; that you may gain the moral courage necessary to believe in something worth believing. Shake off the belief in the canting shams that have hitherto surrounded you, and look up to purer and higher things." Farewell. THE END. PRINTED BY WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, LIMITED, LONDON AND BECCLES. A LIST OF KEG AN PAUL, TRENCH & CO.'S PUBLICATION-S. I, Fati'nwsltr Square, London. A LIST OF KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS. ^GENERAL LITERATI/RE . PARCHMENT LIBRARY . PULPIT COMMENTARY . INTERNATIONAL SCIEN-; SERIES , CONTENTS. PAGE 2 . 2O 23 FIC MILITARY POETRY . WORKS. PAGE 35 NOVELS AND TALES BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG . 42 . 44 32 GENERAL LITERATURE. J-J. K. H. B. From a Quiet Place. A Volume of Sermons. Crown 8vo, $s. ALEXANDER, William, D.D., Bishop of Derry. The Great Ques- tion, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo, 6s. ALLEN, Rev. R., M.A. Abraham : his Life, Times, and Travels, 3800 years ago. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 6s. ALLIES, T. W., M.A.~Per Crucem ad Lucem. The Result of a Life. 2 vols. Demy Svo, 25^. A Life's Decision. Crown Svo, 7-r. bd. AMHERST, Rev. W. J. The History of Catholic Emancipa- tion and the Progress of the Catholic Church in the British Isles (chiefly in England) from 1771-1820. 2 vols. Demy 8vo, 24^. AMOS, Professor Sheldon. The History and Principles of the Civil Law of Rome. An aid to the Study of Scientific and Comparative Jurisprudence. Demy Svo. . iGs. Ancient and Modern Britons. A Retrospect. 2 vols. Demy Svo, 24?. ANDERDON, Rev. W. #. Evenings with the Saints. Crown Svo, 5-r. JiNDERSON, David. "Scenes" in the Commons. Crown Svo, 5*. Kegan Paul, Trench & Co's Publications. 3 ARISTOTLE. The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Trans- lated by F. H. Peters, M.A. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s. ARMSTRONG, Richard A., B.A. Latter-Day Teachers. Six Lectures. Small crown Svo, 2s. 6d. AUBERTIN, y. y.K Flight to Mexico. With Seven full-page Illustrations and a Railway Map of Mexico. Crown 8vo, 7-r. 6J. Six Months in Cape Colony and Natal. With Illustra- tions and Map. Crown 8vo, 6s. BADGER, George Percy, D.C.L. An English- Arabic Lexicon. In which the equivalent for English Words and Idiomatic Sentences are rendered into literary and colloquial Arabic. ] Royal 4to, 8oj. BAGEHOT, J^alfer.The English Constitution. New and Revised Edition. Crown Svo, 7s. 6d. Lombard Street. A Description of the Money Market. Eighth Edition. Crown Svo, "js. 6d. Essays on Parliamentary Reform. Crown Svo, $s. Some Articles on the Depreciation of Silver, and Topics connected with it. Demy Svo, $s. JSAGOT, Alan, C.E. Accidents in Mines: their Causes and Prevention. Crown Svo, 6s. The Principles of Colliery Ventilation. Second Edition, greatly enlarged. Crown Svo, 5-f. The Principles of Civil Engineering as applied to Agriculture and Estate Management. Crown Svo, 7-r. 6d. BAKER, Sir Shcrston, Bart. The Laws relating to Quarantine. Crown Svo, I2j. 6,d. BAKER, Thomas. A Battling Life ; chiefly in the Civil Service. An Autobiography, with Fugitive Papers on Subjects of Public Importance. Crown Svo, *js. 6d. BALDWIN, Capt. J. ff.The Large and Small Game of Bengal and the North- Western Provinces of India. With 20 Illustrations. New and Cheaper Edition. Small 410, IOJ-. 6d. BALLIN, Ada S. and F. L. A Hebrew Grammar. With Exercises selected from the Bible. Crown Svo, 7s. 6d. BARCLAY, Edgar. Mountain Life in Algeria. With numerous Illustrations by Photogravure. Crown 4to, l6j. BARLOW, James W. The Ultimatum of Pessimism. An Ethical Study. Demy Svo, 6s. Short History of the Normans in South Europe. Demy Svo, 7-f. 6ii. 4 A List of BAUR, Ferdinand, Dr. Ph. A Philological Introduction to Greek and Latin for Students. Translated and adapted from the German, by C. KEGAN PAUL, M.A., and E. D. STONE, M.A. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, 6j. BAYLY, Capt. George. Sea Life Sixty Years Ago. A Record of Adventures which led up to the Discovery of the Relics of the long-missing Expedition commanded by the Comte de la Perou*e. Crown 8vo, 3-r. 6t/. BELLAS 'IS, Eduwd.T'he Money Jar of Plautus at the Oratory School. An Account of the Recent Representation, With Appendix and 1 6 Illustrations. Small 410, sewed, 2s. The New Terence at Edgbaston. Being Notices of the Performances in 1880 and 1881. With Preface, Notes, and Appendix. Third Issue. Small 4to, is. 6d. BENN, Alfred W.~ The Greek Philosophers. 2 vols. Demy 8vo, 28.?. Bible Folk-Lore. A Study in Comparative Mythology. Crown Svo, i or. 6J. BIRD, Charles, F.G.S. Higher Education in Germany and England. Being a brief Practical Account of the Organization and Curriculum of the German Higher Schools. With critical Remarks and Suggestions with reference to those of England, Small crown 8vo, zs. 6d. BLECKLY, Henry. Socrates and the Athenians : An Apology. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. BLQOMFIELD, The Lady. Reminiscences of Court and Dip- lomatic Life. New and Cheaper Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown 8vo, 6s. BLUNT, The Ven. Archdeacon. The Divine Patriot, and other Sermons. Preached in Scarborough and in Cannes. Nc\v and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo, 4?. 6d. BLUNT, Wilfrid S. The Future of Islam. Crown 8vo, 6s. Ideas about India. Crown 8vo. Cloth, 6s. BODDY, Alexander A. To Kairwan the Holy. Scenes in Muhammedan Africa. With Route Map, and Eight Illustrations by A. F. JACASSEY. Crown 8vo, 6s. BOSANQUET, Bernard. Knowledge and Reality. A Criticism of Mr. F. H. Bradley's "Principles of Logic." Crown 8vo, gj. BOUVERIE-PUSEY, S. E. ^.Permanence and Evolution. An Inquiry into the Supposed Mutability of Animal Type-. Crown 8vo, 5-f- BOWEN, H. C., M.A. Studies in English. For the use of Modern Schools. Eighth Thousand. Small crown 8vo, is. 6d. English Grammar for Beginners. Fcap. 8vo, is, Simple English Poems. English Literature for Junior Classes. In four parts. Parts I., II., and III., 6d. each. Part IV., u. Complete, 3*. Kcgan Paul, Trench & Co.'s Publications. 5 BRADLEY, F, If. The Principles of Logic. Demy 8vo, i6s. BRIDGETT, Rev. T. ^.History of the Holy Eucharist in Great Britain. 2 vols. Demy 8vo, i8s. BROOKE, Rev. S. A. Life and Letters of the Late Rev. F. W. Robertson, M. A. Edited by. I. Uniform with Robertson's Sermons. 2 vols. With Steel Portrait. 7.5-. 6d. II. Library Edition. With Portrait. Svo, 12s. III. A Popular Edition. In i vol., 8vo, 6s. The Fight of Faith. Sermons preached on various occasions. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 7-r. 6d. Education Library. Edited by PHILIP MAGNUS : An Introduction to the History of Educational Theories. By OSCAR BROWNING, M.A. Second Edition. y. 6d. Old Greek Education. By the Rev. Prof. MAHAFFY, M.A. Second Edition. %s. 6d. School Management. Including a general view of the work of Education, Organization and Discipline. By JOSEPH LANDON. Fifth Edition. 6s. EDWARDES, Major- General Sir Herbert 2?. Memorials of his Life and Letters. By his Wife. With Portrait and Illustra- tions. 2 vols. Demy Svo. 36^. ELSDALE, Henry. Studies in Tennyson's Idylls. Crown Svo, 5*. Emerson's (Ralph Waldo) Life. By OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES. English Copyright Edition. With Portrait. Crown Svo, 6.r. Enoch the Prophet. The Book of. Archbishop LAURENCE'S Trans- lation, with an Introduction by the Author of " The Evolution of Christianity." Crown Svo, 55. Eranus. A Collection of Exercises in the Alcaic and Sapphic Metres. Edited by F. W. CORNISH, Assistant Master at Eton. Second Edition. Crown Svo, 2s. EVANS, Mark.~\\Q Story of Our Father's Love, told to Children. Sixth and Cheaper Edition. With Four Illustrations. Fcap. Svo, is. 6tt, io A List of "Fan Kwae" at Canton before Treaty Days 1825-1844- By an old Resident. With Frontispiece. Crown 8vo, $s. Faith of the Unlearned, The. Authority, apart from the Sanction of Reason, an Insufficient Basis for It. By "One Unlearned." Crown 8vo, 6s. fEIS, Jacob. Shakspere and Montaigne. An Endeavour to Explain the Tendency of Hamlet from Allusions in Contemporary Works. Crown 8vo, $s. FLOREDICE, W. H.K Month among the Mere Irish. Small crown 8vo. Second Edition. 3^. 6UR < " )LD HOME, AND ENGLISH NOTE-BOOKS. IX. AMERICAN NOTE-BOOKS. X. FRENCH AND ITALIAN NOTE-BOOKS. XI. SEPTIMIUS FELTON, THE DOLLIVER ROMANCE, FANSHAWE, AND, IN AN APPENDIX, THE ANCESTRAL FOOTSTEP. XII. TALES AND ESSAYS, AND OTHER PAPERS, WITH A BIO- GRAPHICAL SKETCH OF HAWTHORNE. HEATH, Francis George. Autumnal Leaves. Third and cheaper Edition. Large crown 8vo, 6s. Sylvan Winter. With 70 Illustrations. Large crown Svo, 14.?. HEAWESSY, Sir John Pope. Ralegh in Ireland. With his Letters on Irish Affairs and some Contemporary Documents. Large crowa Svo, printed on hand-made paper, parchment, los. 6d. HENRY, Philip. Diaries and Letters of. Edited by MATTHEW HENRY LEE, M.A. Large crown Svo, 7^. 6d. HINTON, J. Life and Letters. With an Introduction by Sir W, W. GULL, Bart., and Portrait engraved on Steel by C. H. Jeens. Fifth Edition. Crown Svo, 8s. 6d. Philosophy and Religion. Selections from the Manuscripts of the late James Hinton. Edited by CAROLINE HADDON. Second Edition. Crown Svo, $s. The Law Breaker, and The Coming of the Law. Edited by MARGARET HINTON. Crown Svo, 6s. The Mystery of Pain. New Edition. Fcap. Svo, is. Hodson of Hodson's Horse ; or, Twelve Years of a Soldier's Life in India. Being extracts from the Letters of the late Major W. S. R. Hodson. With a Vindication from the Attack of Mr. liosworth Smith. Edited by his brother, G. H. HODSON, M.A. Fourth Edition. Large crown Svo, $s. HOLTHAM, E. G. Eight Years in Japan, 1873-1881. Work, Travel, and Recreation. With three Maps. Large crown 8vo, gj. 14 A List of Homology of Economic Justice. An Essay by an East India Merchant. Small crown 8vo, 5^. HOOPER, Mary. Little Dinners: How to Serve them with Elegance and Economy. Twentieth Edition. Crown Cookery for Invalids, Persons of Delicate Digestion, and Children. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 2s. 61. Every-Day Meals. Being Economical and Wholesome Recipes for Breakfast, Luncheon, and Supper. Sixth Edition. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6(f. HOPKINS, Ellice. Work amongst Working Men. Sixth Edition. Crown 8vo, 3.?. 6d. HORNADAY, W. T. Two Years in a Jungle. With Illustrations. Demy 8vo, 2ls. HOSPITALIER, E. The Modern Applications of Electricity. Translated and Enlarged by JULIUS MAIER, Ph.D. 2 vols. Second Edition, Revised, with many additions and numerous Illustrations. Demy 8vo, I2s. 6d. each volume. VOL. I. Electric Generators, Electric Light. VOL. II. Telephone : Various Applications : Electrical Transmission of Energy. HOWARD, Robert, M.A.The Church of England and other Religious Communions. A course of Lectures delivered in the Parish Church of Clapham. Crown 8vo, "js. 6d. HUMPHREY, Rev. William. The Bible and Belief. A Letter to a P'riend. Small Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. HUNTER, William C. Bits of Old China. Small crown 8vo, 6s. JIUNTINGFORD, Rev. E., D.C.L. The Apocalypse. With a Commentary and Introductory Essay. Demy 8vo, $s. HUTCHINSON, H. Thought Symbolism, and Grammatic Illusions. Being a Treatise on the Nature, Purpose, and Material of Speech. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. HUTTON, Rev. C. F. Unconscious Testimony ; or, The Silent Witness of tbe Hebrew to the Truth of the Historical Scripture?. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6J. HYNDMAN, H. M. The Historical Basis of Socialism in England. Large crown 8vo, 8.f. 6d. George Eliot : Thoughts upon her Life, her Books, and Herself. Second Edition. Small crown 8vo, is. bd. LOUNSBURY, Thomas R. James Fenimore Cooper. With Portrait. Crown Svo, $s. LOWDER, Charles. A. Biography. By the Author of " St. Teresa," New and Cheaper Edition. Crown Svo. With Portrait. 3.?. 6d. LUCRES, Eva C. E. Lectures on General Nursing, delivered to the Probationers of the London Hospital Training School for Nurses. Crown Svo, 2s. 6d. LYALL, William Rowe, D.D. Propaedeia Prophetica ; or, The Use and Design of the Old Testament Examined. New Edition. With Notices by GEORGE C. PEARSON*, M.A., Hon. Canon of Canterbury. Demy Svo, los. 6d. LYTTON, Edu'ard Bukvcr, I^rd. Life, Letters and Literary Remains. By his Son, the EARL OF LYTTON. With Portraits, Illustrations and Facsimiles. Demy Svo. Vols. I. and II,, 32*. MACAULAY, G. C. Francis Beaumont : A Critical Study. Crown Svo, Sj. MAC CALLUM, M. W. Studies in Low German and High German Literature. Crown Svo, 6s. MACHIAVELLI, Niccott. 'LAtQ and Times. By Prof. VILLARI. Translated by LINDA VILLARI. 4 vols. Large post Svo, <\8s. MACIIIAVELLI, Niccolb. Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius. Translated from the Italian by NINIAN HILL THOMSON, M.A. Large crown Svo, \2s. The Prince. Translated from the Italian by N. H. T. Small crown Svo, printed on hand-made paper, bevelled boards, 6s. MACKENZIE, Alcxattder. How India is Governed. Being an Account of England's Work in India. Small crown Svo, 2J. MAGNUS, Mrs. About the Jews since Bible Times. From the Babylonian Exile till the English Exodus. Small crown Svo, 6s. MAGUIRE, Thomas. Lectures on Philosophy. Demy Svo, gs. MAIR, R. S., M.D., F.X.C.S.E.'riie Medical Guide for Anglo- Indians. Being a Compendium of Advice to Europeans in India, relating to the Preservation and Regulation of Health. With a Supplement on the Management of Children in India. Second Edition. Crown Svo, limp cloth, $s. 6d. c 1 8 A List of MALDEN, Henry El Hot. Vienna, 1683. The History and Conse- quences of the Defeat of the Turks before Vienna, September I2th, 1683, by John Sobieski, King of Poland, and Charles Leopold, Duke of Lorraine. Crown 8vo, 4^. 6i/. Many Voices. A volume of Extracts from the Religious Writers of Christendom from the First to the Sixteenth Century. \Vith Biographical Sketches. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, red edges, 6s. MARKHAM, Capt. Albert Hastings, R.JV.The Great Frozen Sea : A Personal Narrative of the Voyage of the Alert during the Arctic Expedition of 1875-6. With 6 Full -page Illustrations, 2 Maps, and 27 Woodcuts. Sixth and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo, or. MARTINEAU, Gertrude. Outline Lessons on Morals. Small crown 8vo, 3.?. 6tf. MAUDSLEY, H., M.D. Body and "Will. Being an Essay con- cerning Will, in its Metaphysical, Physiological, and Pathological Aspects. 8vo, 12s. Natural Causes and Supernatural Seemings. Crown 8vo, 6.r. McGRATH, Terence. Pictures from Ireland. New and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo, 2s. MEREDITH, M.A. Theotokos, the Example for Woman. Dedicated, by permission, to Lady Agnes Wood. Revised by the Venerable Archdeacon DENISON. 321110, limp cloth, is. 6d. MILLER, Edward. The History and Doctrines of Irvingism ; or, The so-called Catholic and Apostolic Church. 2 vols. Large- post 8vo, 2$s. The Church in Relation to the State. Large crown 8vo, 7-r. 6ct. MITCHELL, Lucy M.K History of Ancient Sculpture. With numerous Illustrations, including 6 Plates in Phototype. Super royal 8vo, 42^. MITFORD, Bertram. Through the Zulu Country. Its Battle- fields and its People. With Five Illustrations. Demy 8vo, I4J. MOCKLER, E. A Grammar of the Baloochee Language, as it is spoken in Makran (Ancient Gedrosia), in the Persia-Arabic and Roman characters. Fcap. 8vo, 5-r. MOLESWORTH, Rev. W. Nassau, M.A. History of the Church of England from 1660. Large crown 8vo, Js. 6d. MORELL, y. .ff. Euclid Simplified in Method and Language. Being a Manual of Geometry. Compiled from the most important French Works, approved by the University of Paris and the Minister of Public Instruction. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. Cd. Expository Lectures on St. Paul's Epistles to the Corinthians. A New Edition. Small crown 8vo, 5^. Lectures and Addresses, with other Literary Remains. A New Edition. Small crown 8vo, 5*. An Analysis of Tennyson's " In Memoriam." (Dedicated by Permission to the Poet-Laureate.) Fcap. 8vo, 2s. The Education of the Human Race. Translated from the German of GOTTHOLD EPHRAIM LESSING. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d. SMITH, Edward, M.D., LL.B., F.R.S. Tubercular Consump- tion in its Early and Remediable Stages. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s. SMITH, Sir W. Cusack, Bar/. Our War Ships, A Naval Essay. Crown 8vo, 5^. Spanish Mystics. By the Editor of " Many Voices." Crown 8vo, $s. Specimens of English Prose Style from Malory to Ma- caulay. Selected and Annotated, with an Introductory Essay, by GEORGE SAINTSBURY. Large crown 8vo, printed on hand- made paper, parchment antique or cloth, 125. ; vellum, 15^. SPEDDING, James. Reviews and Discussions, Literary, Political, and Historical not relating to Bacon. Demy 8vO, I2J. 6d. Evenings with a Reviewer ", or, Macaulay and Bacon. With a Prefatory Notice by G. S. VENABLES, Q.C. 2 vols. Demy Svo, i8s. STAFFER, Paul. Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity: Greek and Latin Antiquity as presented in Shakespeare's Plays. Translated by EMILY J. CAREY. Large post Svo, I2s. STATHAM, F. Reginald. Free Thought and Truth Thought. A Contribution to an Existing Argument. Crown Svo, 6s. STEVENSON, Rev. W. /".Hymns for the Church and Home. Selected and Edited by the Rev. W. FLEMING STEVENSON. The Hymn Book consists of Three Parts : I. For Public Worship. II. For Family and Private Worship. III. For Children. SMALL EDITION. Cloth limp, lod. ; cloth boards, is. LARGE TYPE EDITION. Cloth limp, is. 3d. TAYLOR, Sedley. Profit Sharing between Capital and Labour. To which is added a Memorandum on the Industrial Partnership at the Whitwood Collieries, by ARCHIBALD and HENRY BRIGGS, with remarks by SEDLEY TAYLOR. Crown Svo, 2s. 6d. "They Might Have Been Together Till the Last." An Essay on Marriage, and the position of Women in England. Small crown 8vo, 2s. Thirty Thousand Thoughts. Edited by the Rev. CANON SIT.VI . Rev. J. S. EXELL, and Rev. CHARLES NEIL. 6 vols. Super royal Svo. [Vols. I. -IV. now ready, i6s. each. THOM, J. Hamilton. Laws of Life after the Mind of Christ. Two Series. Crown Svo, 7^. 6d. each. THOMPSON, Sir H. Diet in Relation to Age and Activity. Fcap. Svo, cloth, is. 6d, ; Paper covers, u. Kegan Paul, Trench & Go's Publications. 29 TIPPLE, Rev. S. A. Sunday Mornings at Norwood. Prayers and Sermons. Crown 8vo, 6s. TODHUNTER, Dr. J. A Study of Shelley. Crown Svo, 7s. TOLSTOI, Count Leo. Christ's Christianity. Translated from the Russian. Large crown Svo, "js. 6d. TRANT, William. Trade Unions : Their Origin, Objects, and Efficacy. Small crown Svo, is. 6d. ; paper covers, u. TREMENHEERE, Hugh Seymour, C.B. A Manual of the Principles of Government, as set forth by the Authorities of Ancient and Modern Times. New and Enlarged Edition. Crown Svo, 3.?. 6d. Cheap Edition, limp cloth, is. TRENCH, The late R. C., Archbishof.'Notes on the Parables of Our Lord. Fourteenth Edition. Svo, 12s. Notes on the Miracles of Our Lord. Twelfth Edition. Svo, 12s. Studies in the Gospels. Fifth Edition, Revised. Svo, los. 6d. Brief Thoughts and Meditations on Some Passages in Holy Scripture. Third Edition. Crown Svo, y. 6d. Synonyms of the New Testament. Ninth Edition, En- larged. Svo, I2s. Selected Sermons. Crown Svo, 6s. On the Authorized Version of the New Testament. Second Edition. Svo, "js. Commentary on the Epistles to the Seven Churches in Asia. Fourth Edition, Revised. Svo, 8s. (>d. The Sermon on the Mount. An Exposition drawn from the Writings of St. Augustine, with an Essay on his Merits as an Interpreter of Holy Scripture. Fourth Edition, Enlarged. Svo, IQS. 6d. Shipwrecks of Faith. Three Sermons preached before the University of Cambridge in May, 1867. Fcap, Svo, 2s. (>d. Lectures on Mediseval Church History. Being the Sub- stance of Lectures delivered at Queen's College, London. Second Edition. Svo, 12s. English, Past and Present. Thirteenth Edition, Revised and Improved. Fcap. Svo, $s. On the Study of Words. Nineteenth Edition, Revised. Fcap. Svo, 5-f. Select Glossary of English "Words Used Formerly in Senses Different from the Present. Fifth Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Fcap. Svo, $s. Proverbs and Their Lessons. Seventh Edition, Enlarged. Fcap. Svo, qs. Poems. Collected and Arranged anew. Ninth Edition. Fcap. Svo, 7.r. 6ct. 30 A List of TRENCH, The late R. C., Archbishop. -continued. Poems. Library Edition. 2 vols. Small crown 8vo, 10*. Sacred Latin Poetry. Chiefly Lyrical, Selected and Arranged for Use. Third Edition, Corrected and Improved. Fcap. 8vo, JS. A Household Book of English Poetry. Selected and Arranged, with Notes. Fourth Edition, Revised. Extra fcap. 8vo, 5-f. 6cf. An Essay on the Life and Genius of Calderon. With Translations from his "Life's a Dream" and "Great Theatre oi the World." Second Edition, Revised and Improved. Extra fcap. 8vo, $s. 6d. Gustavus Adolphus in Germany, and other Lectures on the Thirty Years' 'War. Second Edition, Enlarged. Fcap. 8vo, 4J. Plutarch : his Life, his Lives, and his Morals. Second Edition, Enlarged. Fcap. 8vo, 3*. 6d. Remains of the late Mrs. Richard Trench. Ik-ing Selec- tions from her Journals, Letters, and other Papers. New and '* Cheaper Issue. With Portrait. 8vo, 6s. TUKE, Daniel Hack, M.D., F.R.C.P. Chapters in the History of the Insane in the British Isles. With Four Illustra- tions. Large crown 8vo, 12s. TWINING, Louisa. Workhouse Visiting and Management during Twenty-Five Years. Small crown 8vo, zs. TYLER, J. The Mystery of Being: or, What Do We Know ? Small crown 8vo, T,S. 6ef. VAUGHAN, H. Half ord. New Readings and Renderings of Shakespeare's Tragedies. 3 vols. Demy 8vo, 12s. 6d. each. VILLARI, Professor. Niccolo Machiavelli and his Times. Translated by LINDA VILLARI. 4 vols. Large post 8vo, 485. VILLIERS, The Right Hon. C. P. Free Trade Speeches of. With Political Memoir. Edited by a Member of the Cobdcn Club. 2 vols. With Portrait. Demy 8vo, 2$s. %* People's Edition. I vol. Crown 8vo, limp cloth, 2s. 6d. VOGT, Lieut. -Col. Hermann. The Egyptian War of 1882.. A translation. With Map and Plans. Large crown Sv<>, 6s. VOLCKXSOM, E. W. v. Catechism of Elementary Modern Chemistry. Small crown 8vo, $s. WALLER, Rev. C. B. The Apocalypse, reviewed under the Light of the Doctrine of the Unfolding Ages, and the Restitution of All Things. Demy 8vo, \2s. The Bible Record of Creation viewed in its Letter and Spirit. Two Sermons preached at St. Paul's Church, Woodford Bridge. Crown 8vo, is. 6d. Kegan Paul, Trench & Go's Publications. 31 WALPOLE, Chas. George. A Short History of Ireland from the Earliest Times to the Union with Great Britain. With 5 Maps and Appendices. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s. WARD, William George, Ph.D. Essays on the Philosophy of Theism. Edited, with an Introduction, by WILFRID WARD, 2 vols. Demy 8vo, 2is. WARD, Wilfrid. The "Wish to Believe, A Discussion Concern- ing the Temper of Mind in which a reasonable Man should undertake Religious Inquiry. Small crown 8vo, 55. WARTER, J. W.Kn Old Shropshire Oak. 2 vols. Demy 8vo, 28.5-. WEDDERBURN, Sir David, Bart., M.P.lLife of. Compiled from his Journals and Writings by his sister, Mrs. E. H. PERCIVAL. With etched Portrait, and facsimiles of Pencil Sketches. Demy 8vo, 14^. WEDMORE, Frederick. The. Masters of Genre Painting. With Sixteen Illustrations. Post 8vo, 7-r. 6d. WHITE, R. E. Recollections of Woolwich during the Crimean War and Indian Mutiny, and of the Ordnance and War Departments ; together with complete Lists of Past and Present Officials of the Royal Arsenal, etc. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. WHITNEY, Prof. William Divight. Essentials of English Grammar, for the Use of Schools. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 3-r. 6d, WHITWORTH, George Clifford. An Anglo-Indian Dictionary : a Glossary of Indian Terms used in English, and of such English or other Non- Indian Terms as have obtained special meanings in India.' Demy 8vo, cloth, 12s. WILLIAMS, Rowland, D.D. Psalms, Litanies, Counsels, and Collects for Devout Persons. Edited by his Widow. New and Popular Edition. Crown 8vo, 3^. 6d. Stray Thoughts from the Note Books of the late Rowland 'Williams, D.D. Edited by his Widow. Crown 8vo, 3^. 6d. WILSON, Lieut. -Col. C. T. The Duke of Berwick, Marshal of France, 1702-1734. Demy 8vo, 15.5-. WILSON, Mrs. R. F. The Christian Brothers. Their Origin and Work. With a Sketch of the Life of their Founder, the Ven. JEAN BAPTISTE, de la Salle. Crown 8vo, 6s. WOLTMANN, Dr. Alfred, and WOERMANN, Dr. Karl History of Painting. With numerous Illustrations. Vol. I. Painting in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Medium 8vo, 28^., bevelled boards, gilt leaves,'30.y. Vol. II. The Painting of the Renascence. 32 A List of YOUMANS, Eliza A. First Book of Botany. Designed to Cultivate the Observing Powers of Children. With 300 Engravings. New and Cheaper Edition. Crown Svo, 2s. 6J. XXXVI. Suicide: an Essay on Comparative Moral Statistics. By Prof. H. Morselli. Second Edition. With Diagrams. 5-f. XXXVII. The Brain and its Functions. By J. Luys. With Illustrations. Second Edition. $s. XXXVIII. Myth and Science : an Essay. By Tito Vignoli. Second Edition. 5^. XXXIX. The Sun. By Professor Young. With Illustrations. Second Edition. 5-r. XL. Ants, Bees, and Wasps : a Record of Observations on the Habits of the Social Hymenoptera. By Sir John Lubbock, Bart., M.P. With 5 Chromo-lithographic Illustrations. Eighth Edition. $* XLI. Animal Intelligence. By G. J. Romanes, LL.D., F.R.S. Third Edition. 5-r. XLI I. The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics. By J. B. Stallo. Third Edition. $s. XLIII. Diseases of the Memory ; An Essay in the Positive Psycho- logy. By Prof. Th. Ribot. Second Edition. $s. XLIV. Man before Metals. By N. Joly, with 148 Illustrations. Third Edition. 5-r. XLV. The Science of Politics. By Prof. Sheldon Amos. Third Edition. 5-r. XLVI. Elementary Meteorology. By Robert H. Scott. Third Edition. With Numerous Illustrations. $s. XLVII. The Organs of Speech and their Application in the Formation of Articulate Sounds. By Georg Hermann Von Meyer. With 47 Woodcuts. $s. XLVIII. Fallacies. A View of Logic from the Practical Side. By Alfred Sidgwick. 5*. XLIX. Origin of Cultivated Plants. By Alphonse de Candolle. 5'- L. Jelly-Fish, Star-Fish, and Sea-Urchins. Being a Research on Primitive Nervous Systems. By G. J. Romanes. With Illustrations. ^. Kegan Paul, Trench & Go's Publications. 35 LI. The Common Sense of the Exact Sciences. By the late William Kingdon Clifford. Second Edition. With 100 Figures. & LII. Physical Expression : Its Modes and Principles. By Francis Warner, M.D., F.R.C.P. With 50 Illustrations. 5*. LIII. Anthropoid Apes. By Robert Hartmann. With 63 Illustra- tions. 5.5-. LIV. The Mammalia in their Relation to Primeval Times. By Oscar Schmidt. With 51 Woodcuts. 5^. LV. Comparative Literature. By H. Macaulay Posnett, LL.D. $s. LVI. Earthquakes and other Earth Movements. By Prof. JOHN MILNE. With 38 Figures. $s. LVII. Microbes, Ferments, and Moulds. ByE. L. TROUESSART. With 107 Illustrations. $s. MILITARY WORKS. BRACKENBURY, Col. C. B., R.A. Military Handbooks for Regimental Officers. I. Military Sketching and Reconnaissance. By Col. F. J. Hutchison and Major H. G. MacGregor. Fourth Edition. With 15 Plates. Small crown 8vo, 4*. II. The Elements of Modern Tactics Practically applied to English Formations. By Lieut. -Col. Wilkinson Sha%v. Fifth Edition. With 25 Plates and Maps. Small crown 8vo, gs. III. Field Artillery. Its Equipment, Organization and Tactics. By Major Sisson C. Pratt, R.A. With 12 Plates. Second Edition. Small crown 8vo, 6s. IV. The Elements of Military Administration. First Part : Permanent System of Administration. By Major J. W. Buxton. Small crown 8vo. "js. 6rf. V. Military Law : Its Procedure and Practice. By Major Sisson C. Pratt, R.A. Second Edition. Small crown 8vo, 4s. 6d. VI. Cavalry in Modern "War. By Col. F. Chenevix Trench. Small crown 8vo, 6s. VII. Field 'Works. Their Technical Construction and Tactical Application. By the Editor, Col. C. B. Brackenbury, R.A. Small crown 8vo. ^ BRENT, Brig.-Gen. J. L. Mobilizable Fortifications and their Controlling Influence in "War. Crown 8vo, 5-r. 36 A List oj BROOKE, Major, C. A'. A System of Field Training. Small crown 8vo, cloth limp, 2s. CLERY, C., Lieut. -Col. Minor Tactics. With 26 Maps and Plans. Seventh Edition, Revised. Crown 8vo, gs. COLVILE, Lieut.-Col. C. F Military Tribunals. Sewed, 2s. 6d. CRAUFURD, Capt. II. J. Suggestions for the Military Train- ing of a Company of Infantry. Crown 8vo, u. 6d. HAMIL TON, Capt. Ian, A.D.C.The Fighting of the Future, u. HARRISON, Col. R. The Officer's Memorandum Book for Peace and War. Fourth Edition, Revised throughout. Oblong 32mo, red basil, with pencil, y. bd. Notes on Cavalry Tactics, Organisation, etc. By a Cavalry Officer. With Diagrams. Demy 8vo, 12s. PARR, Capt. H. Hallam, C.M.G. The Dress, Horses, and Equipment of Infantry and Staff Officers. Crown 8vo, is. SCHAW, Col. .#". The Defence and Attack of Positions and Localities. Third Edition, Revised and Corrected. Crown 8vo, 3-r. 6d. STONE, Capt. F. Gleadowe, R.A. Tactical Studies from the Franco-German War of 1870-71. With 22 Lithographic Sketches and Maps. Demy 8vo, 30.?. WILKINSON, H. Spenser, Capt. 201/1 Lancashire R.V. Citizen Soldiers. Essays towards the Improvement of the Volunteer Force. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. POETRY. ADAM OF ST. VICTOR. The Liturgical Poetry of Adam of St. Victor. From the text of GAUTIER. With Translations into English in the Original Metres, and Short Explanatory Notes, by DIGBY S. WRANGIIAM, M.A. 3 vols. Crown 8vo, printed on hand-made paper, boards, 2is. AUCHMUTY,A. C.--Poems of English Heroism : From Bnmnn- burh to Lucknow ; from Athelstan to Albert. Small crown 8vo, u. 6d. BARNES, William. Poems of Rural Life, in the Dorset Dialect. New Edition, complete in one vol. Crown 8vo, 8.r. 6d. BAYNES, Rev. Canon H. R. Home Songs for Quiet Hours. Fourth and Cheaper Edition. Fcap. 8vo, cloth, 2s. M. KEVINGTON, L. S. Key Notes. Small crown 8vo, $s. BLUNT, Wilfrid Scawen-. fhe Wind and the Whirlwind. Demy 8vo, is. (>d. Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.'s Publications. 37 BLUNT, Wilfred Scawen continued. The Love Sonnets of Proteus. Fifth Edition, i8mo. Cloth extra, gilt top, 55-. BOWEN, H. C., M.A. Simple English Poems. English Literature for Junior Classes. In Four Parts. Parts I., II., and III., 6d. each, and Part IV., is. Complete, 3.?. BRYANT, W. C. Poems. Cheap Edition, with Frontispiece. Small crown 8vo, $s. 6d. Calderon's Dramas: the Wonder-Working Magician Life is a Dream the Purgatory of St. Patrick. Translated by DENIS FLORENCE MACCARTHY. Post 8vo, los. Camoens Lusiads. Portuguese Text, with Translation by J. J. AUBERTIN. Second Edition. 2 vols. Crown 8vo, 12.?. CAMPBELL, Lewis. Sophocles. The Seven Plays in English Verse. Crown 8vo, "js. 6d. LANG, A. XXXII Ballades in Blue China. Elzevir 8vo, $s. Rhymes a la Mode. With Frontispiece by E. A. Abbey. Elzevir 8vo, cloth extra, gilt top, 5.5-. LAWSON, Right Hon. Mr. Justice. Hymni Usitati Latine Redditi : with other Verses. Small 8vo, parchment, $s. Lescing's Nathan the Wise. Translated by EUSTACE K. CORBETT. Crown 8vo, 6s. Life Thoughts. Small crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. Living English Poets MDCCCLXXXII. With Frontispiece by Walter Crane. Second Edition. Large crown 8vo. Printed on hand-made paper. Parchment or cloth, 12s. ; vellum, 15.?. LOCKER, /'.London Lyrics. Tenth Edition. With Portrait, Elzevir 8vo. Cloth extra, gilt top, $s. Love in Idleness. A Volume of Poems. With an Etching by W. B. Scott. Small crown 8vo, $s. LUMSDEN, Lieut. -Col. H. W. Beowulf : an Old English Poem. Translated into Modern Rhymes. Second and Revised Edition. Small crown 8vo, 5^. LYSAGHT, Sidney Ryse.K Modern Ideal. A Dramatic Poem. Small crown 8vo, 5 J - MACGREGOR, Duncan. Clouds and Sunlight. Poems. Small crown 8vo, fj. 4O A List of MAGNUSSOK, Eirikr, M.A., and PALMER, E. //., M.A. Johan Ludvig Runeberg's Lyrical Songs, Idylls, and Epi- grams. Fcap. 8vo, 5-r. MAKCLOUD, Even. Ballads of the Western Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Small crown 8vo, 3^. 6J. MCNAUGHTON, J. H. Onnalinda. A Romance. Small crown 8vo, TS. (>d. MEREDITH, Owen [The Earl of Lytton}. Lucile. New Edition. With 32 Illustrations. l6mo, $s. 6d. Cloth extra, gilt edges, 4s.6d. MORRIS, Lewis. Poetical Works of. New and Cheaper Editions, with Portrait. Complete in 3 vols., $s. each. Vol. I. contains "Songs of Two Worlds." Eleventh Edition. Vol. II. contains "The Epic of Hades." Twentieth Edition. Vol. III. contains " Gwen " and "The Ode of Life." Sixth Edition. The Epic of Hades. With 16 Autotype Illustrations, after the Drawings of the late George R. Chapman. 410, cloth extra, gilt leaves, zis. The Epic of Hades. Presentation Edition. 410, cloth extra, gilt leaves, los. 6d. Songs Unsung. Fifth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5.?. The Lewis Morris Birthday Book. Edited by S. S. CO?K- MAN, with Frontispiece after a Design by the late George K. Chapman. 321110, cloth extra, gilt edges, 2s. ; cloth limp, is. 6d. MORSHEAD, E. D. A. The House of Atreus. Being the Agamemnon, Libation-Bearers, and Furies of ^ischylus. Trans- lated into English Verse. Crown 8vo, 7^. The Suppliant Maidens of ./Eschylus. Crown 8vo, 3^. 6i/. MOZLEY, J. Richards. The Romance of Dennell. A Poem in Five Cantos. Crown 8vo, js. 6d. MULHOLLAND, Rosa. Vagrant Verses. Small crown 8vo, 5^. NOEL, The Hon. Rodtn. A Little Child's Monument. Third Edition. Small crown 8vo, 3^. 6i/. The House of Ravensburg. New Edition. Small crown 8vo, 6s. The Red Flag, and other Poems. New Edition. Small crown 8vo, 6s. Songs of the Heights and Deeps. Crown 8vo, 6s. OBBARD, Constance Mary. Burley Bells. Small crown 8vo, 3*. G.i. O'HAGAN, John. The Song of Roland. Translated into English Verse. New and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo, 5^. PFEIPFER, tm7r.The Rhyme of the Lady of the Rock, and How it Grew. Second Edition. Small crown 8vo, 3*. 6J. Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.'s Publications. 41 PFEIFFER, Emily continued. Gerard's Monument, and other Poems. Second Edition. Crown Svo, 6s. Under the Aspens J Lyrical and Dramatic. With Portrait. Crown Svo, 6s. PIATT, J. J. Idyls and Lyrics of the Ohio Valley. Crown Svo, 5^. /'I ATT, Sarah M. B.K Voyage to the Fortunate Isles, and other Poems. I vol. Small crown Svo, gilt top, 5-r. In Primrose Time. A New Irish Garland. Small crown Svo, zs. 6d. Rare Poems of the 16th and 17th Centuries. Edited W. ]. LINTON. Crown Svo, 5.?. RHOADES, Ja/nes. The Georgics of Virgil. Translated into English Verse. Small crown Svo, 5-c. Poems. Small crown Svo, 4^. 6d. ROBLVSON, A. Mary F.A Handful of Honeysuckle. Fcap. Svo, 3.?. 6d. The Crowned Hippolytus. Translated from Euripides. With New Poems. Small crown Svo, $s. ROUS, Lieut. -Col. Conradin. Small crown Svo, 2s. SAND YS, R. H. Egeus, and other Poems. Small crown Svo, 3.?. f>d. SCHILLER, Friedrich. Wallenstein. A Drama. Done in English Verse, by ]. A. W. HUNTER, M. A. Crown Svo, Js. 6d. SCOTT, E.J. L. The Eclogues of Virgil. Translated into English Verse. Small crown Svo, 3-f. (>d. SCOTT, George F. E. Theodora and other Poems. Small crown Svo, 3.?. 6d. SEYMOUR, F. H. A. Rienzi. A Play in Five Acts. Small crown Svo, S.T. Shak 's "Works. The Avon Edition, 12 vols., fcap. Svo, cloth, iSj. ; and in box, 2\s. ; bound in 6 vols., cloth, 15^. SHERBROOKE, Viscount. Poems of a Life. Second Edition. Small crown Svo, zs. 6d. SMITH, J. W. Gilbart. The Loves of Vandyck. A Tale of Genoa. Small crown Svo, zs. 6d. The Log o' the "Norseman." Small crown Svo, 5^. Songs of Coming Day. Small crown Svo, 3^. 6d. Sopriocles ; The Seven Plays in English Verse. Translated by LEWIS CAMPBELL. Crown Svo, js. 6d. SPICE R, Henry. Haska : a Drama in Three Acts (as represented at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, March loth, 1877). Third Edition. Crown Svo, 3^. 6d. Uriel Acosta, in Three Acts. From the German of Gatzkow. Small crown Svo, 2s. 6d. 42 A List of SYAfONDS, John AtMing/on.Vagabunduli Libellus. Crown 8vo, 6s. Tasso's Jerusalem Delivered. Translated by Sir JOHN KINGSTON JAMES, Bart. Two Volumes. Printed on hand-made paper, parchment, bevelled boards. Large crown Svo, 2is. TAYLOR, Sir H. Works. Complete in Five Volumes. Crown Svo, 30.?. Philip Van Artevelde. Fcap. Svo, y. 6d. The Virgin Widow, etc. Fcap. Svo, 3-r. 6d. The Statesman. Fcap. Svo, $s. 6d. TAYLOR, Augustus. Poems. Fcap. Svo, 5-r. TAYLOR, Margaret Scott. " Boys Together," and other Poems. Small crown Svo, 6.r. TODHUNTER, Dr. J. Laurella, and other Poems. Crown Svo, 6s. 6J. Forest Songs. Small crown Svo, 3-r. 6d. The True Tragedy of Rienzi : a Drama. $s. 6a Alcestis : a Dramatic Poem. Extra fcap. Svo, $s. Helena in Troas. Small crown Svo, 2s. 6d. TYLER, M. C. Anne Boleyn. A Tragedy in Six Acts. Second Edition. Small crown Svo, 2s. 6d. TYNAN, Katheritie. Louise de la Valliere, and other Poems. Small crown Svo, 3-r. (3d. WEBSTER, Augusia.In a Day : a Drama. Small crown Svo, 2s. (x/. Disguises : a Drama. Small crown Svo, 5-f. Wet Days. By a Farmer. Small crown Svo, 6s. WOOD, Rev. F. //.Echoes of the Night, and other Poems. Small crown Svo, 35. 6d. 'Wordsworth Birthday Book, The. Edited by ADELAIDE and VIOLET WORDSWORTH. 321110, limp cloth, u. 6//. ; cloth extra, 2s. YOUNGMAN, Thomas George. Poems. Small crown Svo, 5^. YOUNGS, Ella Sharps. Paphus, and other Poems. Small crown Svo, y. 6d. A Heart's Life, Sarpedon, and other Poems. Small crown Svo, 3J. 6d. NOVELS AND TALES. "All But :" a Chronicle of Lax enford Life. By PEN OLIVER, F.R.C.S. With 20 Illustrations. Second Edition. Crown Svo, 6s. BANKS, Mrs. G. L. God's Providence House. New Edition. Crown Svo, 3^. 6d. CIHCHELE, Mary. Doing and Undoing. A Story. Crown Svo, OfS. 6d. Danish Parsonage. By an Angler. Crown Svo, 6s. Kegan Paul, Trench & Co's Publications. 43 HUNTER, Hay. The Crime of Christmas Day. A Tale of the Latin Quarter. By the Author of ' ' My Ducats and my Daughter." is. HUNTER, Hay, and WHYTE, Walter. My Ducats and My Daughter. New and Cheaper Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. Hurst and Hanger. A History in Two Parts. 3 vols. 31^. 6d. INGELOW, %-an.Ott the Skelligs : a Novel. With Frontispiece. Second Edition. Crown Svo, 6s. JENKINS, Edward. A. Secret of Two Lives. Crown Svo, 2s. 6d. KIELLAND, Alexander L. Garman and "Worse. A Norwegian Novel. Authorized Translation, by W. W. Kettlewell. Crown Svo, 6s. MACDONALD, G. Donal Grant. A Novel. Second Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. Castle Warlock. A Novel. Second Edition. With Frontis- piece. Crown Svo, 6^. Malcolm. With Portrait of the Author engraved on Steel. Seventh Edition. Crown Svo, 6s. The Marquis of Lossie. Sixth Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. St. George and St. Michael. Fifth Edition. With Frontis- piece. Crown Svo, 6s. "What's Mine's Mine. Second Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. Annals of a Quiet Neighbourhood. Fifth Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. The Seaboard Parish : a Sequel to "Annals of a Quiet Neigh- bourhood." Fourth Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. "Wilfred Cumbermede. An Autobiographical Story. Fourth Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. MALET, Lucas. Colonel Enderby's "Wife. A Novel. New and Cheaper Edition. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6.r. MULHOLLAND, Rosa. Marcella Grace. An Irish Novel. Crown Svo. PALGRAVE, IV. Gifford. Hermann Agha ; an Eastern Narrative. Third Edition. Crown Svo, 6s. SHA W, Flora L. Castle Blair : a Story of Youthful Days. New and Cheaper Edition. Crown Svo, 3^. 6d. STRETTON, Hesba. Through a Needle's Eye : a Story. New and Cheaper Edition, with Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6^. TAYLOR, Col. Meadows, C.S.I., M.R.I.A.SeQla.'. a Novel. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6.?. Tippoo Sultaun : a Tale of the Mysore War. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. Ralph Darnell. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. A Noble Queen. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. The Confessions of a Thug. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. Tara ; a Mahratta Tale. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. Within Sound of the Sea. With Frontispiece. Crown Svo, 6s. 44 A List of Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.'s Publications. BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG. Brave Men's Footsteps. A Book of Example and Anecdote for Young People. By the Editor of "Men who have Risen." With 4 Illustrations by C. Doyle. Eighth Edition. Crown 8vo, $s. , LONDON AND BECCI.ES.