HD 70G3 A5 DOCUMENTS DEPT. IRLF SB Mb Sflfl CD O GIFT OF DOCUMENTS DEPT. COMMONWEALTH BUREAU OF CENSUS AND STATISTICS MELBOURNE. INQUIRY INTO THE COST OF LIVING IN AUSTRALIA, 1910-11. BY G. H. KNIBBS, CMC., FELLOW OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY, ETC. COMMONWEALTH STATISTICIAN. PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HONOURABLE KING O'MALLEY, M.P., MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS. By authority : McCarron, Bird & Co.. Printers, 479 Collins Street, Melbourne. CC.8., No. 138.] COMMONWEALTH BUREAU OF CENSUS AND STATISTICS MELBOURNE. INQUIRY INTO THE COST OF LIVING IN AUSTRALIA, > Families having Incomes of Number of Members. s 6 I! Avera Childrei Farnil Over 17. 13-16 Over 17. 13-16 10-12 6-9 2-5 "c Over 200 Over 4 56 237 4.23 47 8 20 32 39 34 36 21 4 or under 30 47 1.56 8 8 3 3 7 10 10 200 and under ... Over 4 49 173 3.53 20 2 3 10 20 32 59 27 4 or under ... 45 65 1.44 ' 2 1 2 7 3 4 23 21 Total 180 522 2.90 77 11 33 52 65 77 128 79 It may be seen from the above table that a somewhat unduly large number of the children in the families investigated were comprised in the lower age-groups, those of the age of 5 years and under numbering 207, or nearly 40 per cent, of the whole number. This somewhat high percentage indicates that a considerable number of the persons rendering returns had. not been married for a long period; and, indeed, it is only natural to assume that such persons are the more likely to be interested in an inquiry of this 10 FAMILY CONDITIONS. nature. As might be expected, the great majority of children in the higher age-groups who were not wage-earners is confined to the class having the larger incomes. The total number of children at work was 88, or 16.8 per cent., and of those at home or at school was 434, or 83.2 per cent., on the total number of children. (iv.) Dependents, Boarders, and Servants. The following table shews the number of persons who may be considered as outside the family circle, but whose cost of living is included in the family expenditure, either as dependents (other than wives and children), boarders, or servants. Families having dependents, boarders, or servants during any part or the whole of the period under review are included in this table : COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. CONDITION OF FAMILIES AS DEPENDENTS, BOARDERS, AND SERVANTS. i Dependents Boarders. Servants. P.c. of Families having Families having Incomes of Number of Members. >tal Famil amilies having pendents. imber of pendents. amilies aaving oarders. imber of oarders. Ill j| 1 E i 3rvants. EH " P Q fc pq ffi I*. OQ a dc Over 200 Over 4 58 4 5 7 10 21 25 6.89 12.07 36.20 4 and under ... 41 5 5 5 5 8 8 12.19 12.19 19.51 200 and under Over 4 49 2 2 3 6 2 - 2 4.08 6.12 4.08 4 and under ... 64 2 2 3.13 Total 212 11 12 15 21 33 37 5.19 7.07 15.09 4. Occupations of Heads of Families. In order to give some idea of the class of persons to whom the returns refer, the following table shewing the occupations of the heads of families has been compiled : (a) Unskilled labour includes such persons as general labourers, railway gangers, etc. ; (6) Skilled labourers, artisans and tradesmen, such as fitters,, carpenters, electrical workers, etc. ; (d) Agricultural includes farmers, dairymen, gardeners, and orchardists ; (e) Commercial, those engaged in trade, such as chemists, tobacconists, storekeepers, efcc. ; (/) Clerical, book-keepers and clerks ; (g) Professional, clergymen, doctors, school teachers, etc.; and (h) No occupation comprises persons retired from business, families with no husband, and heads of families who failed to state their occupations : COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. OCCUPATIONS OF HEADS OF FAMILIES. Occupation of Head of Family. Families having Incomes of Number of Members. Un- skilled Labour Skilled Labour Agric'l- tural. Com- mercial Cleric' 1 Profes- sional. None. Total. Over 200 Over 4 3 12 3 11 9 16 4 58 4 and under 4 2 4 10 11 10 41 200 and under Over 4 11 12 1 2 9 9 5 49 4 and under 7 24 5 4 12 6 6 64 Total 21 52 11 21 40 42 25 212 It may be seen that what is commonly known as the wage-earning class (skilled and unskilled labour) comprises 73 families, or 34.4 per cent.; clerical and commercial together include 61 families, or 28.8 per cent. ; and professional 42, or nearly 20 per- cent. INCOMES. 11 4. Incomes. 1. Sources of Incomes. The sources of the family incomes are shewn in the sub- joined table, classified according to amount of income and size of family. The third column shews the number of families having incomes from the husband only. The fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh columns comprise families having incomes from more than one source. " Miscellaneous" comprises incomes from boarders, investments, etc. The figures given in these columns are not mutually exclusive ; that is to say that, for example, a family having an income from both husband and wife is included in both the fourth and fifth columns, while a family having an income derived from wife, children and boarders is included in each of the fifth, sixth and seventh columns. It may be seen that a larger proportion of the small families than the large families derive their incomes from the husband only. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. SOURCES OF INCOMES. las Families having Incomes from more than one source. si. "o !* Families having Weekly Incomes of Number of Members. ill [usband id ources. Wife id eurces. I i I I s* allies wi }s of Inc >t stated Numbe amilies. MI a . n's fl 5 I s * 11 "o h 1 1 "o A o I 1 s EH No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Over 200 Over 4... 11 44 9 24 36 2 58 4 and under 16 22 4 3 19 41 200 and under ... Over 4... 16 28 5 8 22 2 49 4 and under 28 31 6 2 29 2 64 Total 71 125 24 37 106 6 212 2. Average Incomes. The following table shews the average weekly income for each of the groups specified, and also the general average for all families for which budgets were received : COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. AVERAGE INCOMES OF FAMILIES. Particulars. Incomes of over 200. Incomes of 200 & under. General Average. Families of over 4 Members. Families of 4 and under. Families of over 4 Members. Families of 4 and under. Average weekly income s. d. 6 7 11 s. d. 6 16 4 s. d. 3 .1 11 s. d. 2 18 5 s. d. 4 13 1 The figures given in the above table are subject to certain limitations, inasmuch as in a few cases the total earnings of children were not included in the returns, the amounts specified comprising only the weekly payments made into the housekeeping fund for board and lodging. In a few other cases the amount of actual income was not specified at all, the sums drawn from a bank account for current expenses being given. It is somewhat remarkable that in the higher income class the average incomes of f milies of over 4 members (6 7s. lid.) is less than that of families of 4 and under 6 16s. 4d.) Although the number of returns is insufficient for secure deductions, this result appears to indicate that the class of persons with larger income have relatively small families. 12 EXPENDITURE. 5. Expenditure. 1. Relation to Income. The average weekly incomes of the 212 families are sum- marised in the table hereunder. It should be noted that the figures relating to income are subject to the limitations pointed out in the preceding paragraph of this report. The differences between these weekly averages, representing the surplus available for saving are also shewn. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. RELATION OF INCOME TO EXPENDITURE. Particulars. Families having Incomes of over 200. Families having Incomes of 200 and under. General Average for all Families. Over 4 Members. 4 Members and under. Over 4 Members. 4 Members and under. Income ... Expenditure Difference s. d. 6 7 11 5 12 4 s. d. 6 16 4 5 2 5J s. d. 3 1 11 2 15 7 s. d. 2 18 5 2 13 Of s. d. 4 13 1 3 19 5 15 62 1 13 lOf ! 6 4 5 42 13 8 Just as the table on page 11 indicated that, in the higher income group, the smallei families had relatively larger incomes, so the above table points to the fact that, as might be expected, the surplus, after payment of cost of living, is considerably greater in small than in large families. The weekly averages specified in the lasi line of this table represent annual amounts of 40 9s. 3d., 88 2s. 7d., 16 9s. 4d., li 18s. 5d., and 35 10s. 8d. respectively. This advantage in economic res9urces whicl characterises the small family is probably generally true. 2. General Analysis of Expenditure. Selecting what may be considered as th( four most important heads of expenditure, viz., housing, food, clothing, and fuel anc light, and grouping all other expenditure under the heading " Other Items," an analysis of the average weekly expenditure per family is given in the following table. The results are shewn both as actual averages and as percentages on the total expenditure. Th< individual items included in each group may be readily understood by reference to th( list given on page 5. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE WEEKLY EXPENDITURE PER FAMILY. Families having Incomes of Number of Members. Housing. Food. Clothing. Fuel and Light. Other Items. Total Ex- penditure Over 200 200 and under Over 4 4 and under Over 4 4 and under s. d. 13 3i 14 2 080! 8 8i s. d. 1 11 101 1 2 6i 1 2 3i 16 8 s. d. 14 82 12 5i 074 066 ! s. d. 3 3f 038 2 4k 020 s. d. 2 9 1* 2 9 7i 15 6i 19 2J s. d. 5 12 4t 5 2 5t 2 15 7 2 13 Of General Average 10 10* 1 3 3i 10 It | 029 1 12 5 3 19 5 PERCENTAGE ON TOTAL EXPENDITURE. Over 200 200 and under Over 4 4 and under Over 4 4 and under per cent. ! per cent. 11.84 28.39 13.83 22.00 14.48 40.12 16.41 31.41 per cent. 13.11 12.16 13.22 12.25 per cent. 2.95 3.58 4.26 3.77 per cent. 43.71 48.43 27.92 36.16 per cent. 100 100 100 100 General 1 Average 13.70 29.30 12.72 3.46 40.82 100 EXPENDITURE. 13 It may be seen that, disregarding the expenditure on other items, the cost of food is by far the most important consideration, amounting to over 29 per cent, of the total expenditure. Next comes housing (13.70 per cent.), followed closely by clothing (12.72 per cent.), while expenditure on fuel and light amounts to 3.46 per cent. As regards expenditure on housing, clothing, and fuel and light, the divergencies in the percentages for the several groups, classed according to income and size of family, are not very marked, whereas the percentage expended on food ranges from 22 to over 40, being naturally higher in the larger family groups. The expenditure on food is again relatively much larger in the smaller income group, indicating that economies in expenditure are primarily effected in regard to matters other than food. It is not unlikely, indeed, that expenditure on food alone furnishes a true indication of the standard of material well- being.* The more limited the resources of the individual, the less must his consumption be, and the coarser the quality of his food.t In Germany anthropometrical measure- ments have resulted in shewing that the typical man of the poorer classes, by reason of the nutritive inferiority of his food, is neither so corpulent nor so heavy as the typical man of other classes. In connection with the preceding table it is interesting to compare the results obtained in Australia with those obtained in the United States of America in regard -to the economic law propounded by Doctor Engel, for many years Chief of the Royal Bureau of Statistics of Prussia. Dr. Engel's propositions were as follow : (i.) That the greater the income the smaller the percentage of outlay for subsistence. This is confirmed in Australia, Germany, and the United States. (ii.) That the percentage of outlay for clothing is approximately the same, whatever the income. This proposition is confirmed in Australia, but in Germany and the United States it is not so, as in these countries the percentage of expenditure on clothing increases as the size of the income increases. (iii.) That the percentage for lodging or rent, and for fuel and lighting, is invariably the same, whatever the income. The first part of this proposition is not confirmed in Australia, as the families _with smaller incomes pay a larger percentage in housing than those with larger incomes. The second part is practically confirmed here. In the United States the first part is confirmed, and the expenditure for lighting varies little, but the percentage of expenditure for fuel decreases as the income increases. In Germany neither parts of the proposition are confirmed, the percentages decreasing as the incomes increase. (iv. i That as the income increases in amount the percentage of outlay for sundries becomes greater. This is confirmed in Australia, Germany, and the United States. 3. Comparison with other Countries. Any direct comparison of the results of inquiries as to the cost of living in Australia and other countries is practically impossible, owing mainly to two things, viz., (a) that the inquiries have not generally been con- ducted on similar lines ; and (b), that budgets have not been obtained either for corre- sponding classes of persons or for similar income groups. Any adequate comparison of cost of living in different countries requires the dissection out of the general result of the folio wing things, viz., (i.) standard of living; (ii.) prices; (iii.) rates of wages ; (iv.) social classifications ; and (v. ) general economic conditions. Of those countries for which information is available the results for the United States of America and for Germany can be presented in a form similar to that shewn in the table in paragraph 2 hereof (see p. 12). But even in these cases direct comparisons are impracticable, for in America the inquiry was limited to working-class families, * See Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. LI., p. 161. tit does not of course follow that the nutritive value is less. 14 EXPENDITURE. while in Germany the average incomes are much lower than in either Australia or th< United States. A comparison of the general percentage distribution of expenditure ii these countries is shewn in the table hereunder. In order to make the figures mor< fully comparable, family groups have been selected for the United States and Germany with incomes approximately the same as the general average for Australia. COST OF LIVING. COMPARISON OF GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENDITURE IN AUSTRALIA, UNITED STATES, AND GERMANY. Percentage on Total Expenditure of Cost of Particulars. Housing. Food. Fuel and Light. Clothing. Other Ex- penditure. Australia 13.70 29.30 3.46 12.72 40.82 100.00 United States* ... 17.40 36.45 5.03 15.72 25.40 100.00 Germany "f 14.90 30.31 3.12 14.91 36.76 100.00 Inquiry made in 1902. t Inquiry made in 1907. It may be seen that the greatest variation occurs in the percentage expended o food, and this is largely due to the facts previously mentioned, namely, that in th United States families with high incomes were expressly excluded, while in Germany th average income is low, whereas the budgets for Australia include all classes, and income are thus relatively high. As regards expenditure on food in relation to income, comparisons can be mad with the United Kingdom, France, and Belgium, in addition to the United Stat< and Germany, special inquiries having been made into the cost of living in thes countries by the British Board of Trade during the years 1907 to 1910. In tt inquiries instituted in all the countries specified, except Australia, the budgei relate only to working-class families. For Australia figures are therefore given, not on] regarding general results obtained for all groups, but also for the special group bavin incomes of 200 and under, and families of over 4 members, since it is considered thj the families included in that group are more closely analogous to the class of famili< for which investigations were made in the other countries specified. The groups ( working-men's families earning the highest rates of wages have been selected for thes other countries in order that the results may approximate as closely as possible to th conditions present in the Australian inquiry. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. EXPENDITURE ON FOOD IN AUSTRALIA COMPARE WITH THAT IN OTHER COUNTRIES. Country. 1 Average Weekly In- come per Family. Average Number of Members per Family. Average Weekly Ex- penditure on Food. Percentage of Expendi- mre on Food on Average Income. Weekly Cost of Food per Head S. d. No. s. d. per cent. s. d. Australia -, j. 4 13 1 3 1 11 4.71- 5.6 1 3 3J 1 2 S| 25.0 36.0 4 11J 4 0| United States 306 6.0 1 12 6 53.7 5 5 United Kingdom ... 2 12 Ofc 6.4 198 57.0 4 7J Germany ... 2 8 8i 5.8 1 7 4 54.4 4 8 France 2 12 11 4.9 1 11 7| 59.7 6 If Belgium ... 2 12 1J 5.9 j 1 9 8i 56.9 4 9i * All Groups, t Groups having incomes of 200 and under and families of more than 4 rnembei EXPENDITURE. 15 It may be seen, therefore, that in regard to the first set of figures given for Australia (relating to all groups) the weekly cost of food per head is higher than in all the other countries except the United States and France, while the percentage of expenditure on food- is less than in any other country. In regard, however, to the special group selected, which is considered to approximate more closely to the groups included in the returns for other countries, the cost per head is considerably less than in any other country, as also is the percentage of expenditure on food. Having dealt with the general distribution of expenditure, it will now be desirable to refer in greater detail to some of the more important items specified in the budgets. 4. Housing Accommodation. The following table gives particulars of the number of families (a) owning houses unencumbered by mortgage ; (6) living rent free, i.e., having houses or quarters either in lieu of, or in addition to, salary or wages ; (c) owning houses, but paying interest on mortgages thereon ; and (d), leasing houses on rent. The absolute numbers are shewn in addition to the percentages in each class. COST OF LIVING, 1919-11. PARTICULARS OF FAMILIES OWNING, LEASING HOUSES, ETC. Families having Incomes of Number of Members. Owning Houses. Living BentFree. Paying In- terest on Mortgages Paying In- stalments on Purchase. Paying Rent. Total Families. NUMBER OF FAMILIES. No. No. No. No. No. No. Over 200 Over 4 12 4 6 8 28 58 4 and under 8 2 6 5 20 41 -200 and under Over 4 5 4 4 7 29 49 4 and under 9 3 5 15 32 64 Total 34 13 21 35 109 212 PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES. per cent. per cent. per cent. per cent. per cent. per cent. Over 200 Over 4 20.69 6.89 10.35 13.79 48.28 100 4 and under 19.51 4.88 14.63 12.20 48.78 100 200 and under Over 4 10.21 8.16 8.16 14.18 59.19 100 4 and under 14.07 4.69 7.81 24.43 50.00 100 Total 16.04 6.13 9.91 16.51 51.41 100 It may be seen from the above figures that slightly over one-half (51.41 per cent.) of the total number of families lease their houses on rent, and that the proportion of families leasing houses is greater in the lower than in the higher nicome group. The percentage of families buying bouses by instalments is 24.43 in the group having incomes of 200 and under and families of 4 and under, and is considerably higher in that group than in any other. The figures shew, not unexpectedly, that a greater proportion of families in the higher income group than in the lower own their houses. The average weekly amount spent on housing accommodation by way of interest, instalments on purchase, and rent is shewn in the table hereunder. The last column shews the average weekly percentage of expenditure on housing accommodation on total expenditure for those families which have an expenditure on this item ; that is to say, that in computing the percentages, the expenditures of the 47 families which either own their houses or live rent free are excluded. If, EXPENDITURE. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11, EXPENDITURE PER FAMILY ON HOUSING ACCOMMODATION. Average Amount Spent < uo , rt O Weekly on ^-S'SSc Families having Number of Number of '-? s s a o'- 3 Incomes of Members. Families. Interest. Instal- ments. Rent. a^sS-fl ^ s. d. s. d. s. d. per cent. Over 200 ... Over 4... 42 4 6f 14 6 17 3| 16.10 4 and under 31 7 5i 13 6| 18 4 17.58 200 and under Over 4 ... 40 2 2} 9 10 9 3 17.50 4 and under 52 2 10 10 2J 10 3i 20.22 General Average 165 4 7 11 9 13 3| 17.58 It is significant that in both income groups the smaller families pay not only a higher rent than the larger families, but also disburse a greater percentage of their expenditure on housing accommodation. This points to the fact that the smaller families are able to live in greater comfort than the larger. Owing to the comparatively small number of budgets received, it is not possible to make any general analysis of the average amounts paid for housing accommodation according to geographical distribution of the families. The figures shew, however, that the 25 families living in Sydney paid an average weekly rent of 17s. 10d., or 18.4 per cent, on the total expenditure of their families, while in Melbourne 29 families paid an average weekly rent of 14s. 10d., or 18.5 per cent, on their total expenditure. The number of budgets from other individual places is not sufficient to warrant the presenta- tion of any averages based thereon. 5. Expenditure on Food. The data obtained from the budgets as to expenditure on food form one of the most important features of the inquiry. It is proposed to present the results from the following standpoints, viz. : (i.) Average weekly expenditure per family ; (ii.) average weekly expenditure per head (unweighted) ; and (iii.) average weekly expenditure per head (weighted) according to sex and age groups. (i.) Average Weekly Expenditure per Family on Food. The table given here- under shews the average weekly expenditure per family on each item of food specified in the householder's budget, classified according to income group and size of family. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. AVERAGE WEEKLY EXPENDITURE PER FAMILY ON VARIOUS ITEMS OF FOOD. 03 -+3 Families having Incomes of Number of Membres. 0) h 1 II g || 6 3 n 03 D I'll * S3 o "o w |1 MO 02 OEn H s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. Over 200 Over 4 4 and under... 3 2 1 lOi in 4 4* 3 5 3 5| 4 2 1 lOi l 04 1 2 10 6 74 4 9 1 11 10i 1 2 64 200 and under ... Over 4 4 and under... 2 8i 1 8 4 11 3 9i 2 8* 2 2 2 74 III l 0* 10| 8| 4 4 3 3i 1 2 34 16 8 ' General Average 2 4J 5 2J 3 14 2 8 2 114 1 44 10| 4 8| 1 3 3i It may be seen that the most important item of expenditure in Australia is that on meat, which is followed in the order named by expenditure on other food : vegetables and fruit, butter, cheese, etc.. milk, bread, sugar, and tea, coffee, etc. That order is EXPENDITURE. 17 not, however, invariably maintained in the individual groups. As might be anticipated, the expenditure on food is greater in the higher income class and in the larger family groups. A comparison of expenditure on food in Australia with that in other countries has already been given on p. 14 hereof. (ii.) Average Weekly Expenditure per Head on Various Items of Food. The next table furnishes particulars of expenditure per head, irrespective of sex and age, on each item of food. In computing the number of persons who were a charge upon the family expenditures temporary absence from home has been taken into account (see p. 9 herein- before) . COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. AVERAGE WEEKLY EXPENDITURE ON FOOD PER HEAD. Sx Expenditure per Head on *.2 3* 00 OjjJS Families having Incomes of Number of Members. Numb* of Famil E fc-8 Average > ber of He per Fam W 1 egetables nd Fruit. i if 1 cc 4 O ^ 38 Ofe I p> e3 Q Q d. s. d. d. d. d ' d. d. s. d. s. d. Over 200 Over 4 58 385.4 6.65 53 1 Of 61 2 1 4 9 4 and under 41 140.7 3.43 6* 1 6 Hi 10 gl 3w 3 1 4* 6 6J 200 and under Over 4 4 and under 49 64 275.9 190.1 5.63 2.97 1 lOi 1 31 5 8f 54 71 9* 3 4 2 3 91 1 11 3 114 5 71 General Average 212 992.1 4.68 6 1 1 7| 61 71 8ft 21 1 4 10j It may be seen that in each of the income groups the smaller families spend a greater amount on food per head than the larger families. This is no doubt partly due to the fact that in the larger families greater economies can be effected in regard to waste, but it also indicates that the smaller families, as previously pointed out, live in a greater degree of comfort than the larger families. The expenditure per head on the various items specified is in the same order as the expenditure per family. (iii.) Average Weekly Expenditure per Head on Food, according to Sex and Age Groups. The figures given in the table in the preceding paragraph relating to cost per head of various items of food do not differentiate either between sex or age groups. On page 9 hereof particulars have already been given specifying the average number of members of families classified according to sex and age groups. By weighting each class, in the manner indicated hereunder, according to the cost of food consumed, an average weekly cost can be computed for each class. Earlier investigations have shewn that the average consumption of an adult male and an adult female differ, so also, of course, does the average consumption at different ages. Hence in analysing the results we should weight each class according to its consumption so determined. Then in the manner indicated hereunder the average weekly cost can be computed for each class on a common basis. (See footnote for method.) 1 1. Let Ni, N 2 , Ns, ...... etc. represent, in any income and family group, the average number of heads in each sex and age class. Let also w iy w 2 , w 3 , ...... etc., denote the corresponding weights representing the relative consumption of each sex and age class. Then if S be the total weekly sum expended on food for a whole group, we shall have _ S _ _ ^. gav Niw>i + N 2 w 2 + N 3 u> 3 + etc. k being then the average cost of food per unit-weight, this unit being arbitrarily taken to measure w. Let Ci, C 2 , C 3) ...... etc., denote the average weekly cost per head in each class with the corre- sponding suffixes, then the square brackets denoting the sum of all the products of the numbers into the weight as above. Similarly C 2 , C 3 , etc. = fcw 2 , kw 3 , etc. These values kw, etc., denote then the average weekly expenditure per head for the several classes denoted by the suffixes. 18 EXPENDITURE. The weights applied to each sex and age group were selected after a careful stud had been made of reports and other available information bearing on the matter, hot from a physiological, economic and anthropometric standpoint. The weights selecte for each class were as follow : COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. EXPENDITURE ON FOOD, WEIGHTS ASSIGNED TO EACH CLASS. Particulars. Males. Females. Children. Age in years ... Over 17. 13-16. Over 17. 13-16. 10-12. 6-9. 2-5. Under 2 Weight 100 80 80 70 65 50 35 20 The average number of persons in each sex and age class in the various grouj classified according to income and size of family have already been given in the table o page 9. The total weekly expenditure on food for each group was 92 9s. 7d. , 46 3s. lOd 54 lls. lid., and 53 6s. 7d., while the total weekly expenditure for all groups wa 246 lls. lid. Proceeding on the lines indicated, see formula in preceding footnot< the results are shewn for each class in each group in the following table : COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. AVERAGE WEEKLY EXPENDITURE PER HEAD ON FOOD FOR EACH SEX AT DIFFERENT AGES. 1 Males. Females. Children. Families having Number Incomes of of Members. Over 17. 13-16. Over 17. 13-16. 10-12. 6-9. 2-5. Unde 2. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d Over 200 Over 4 4 and under ... 6 61 8 3| 5 2f 6 7* 5 23 6 7$ 4 6f 5 10 4 2f 5 4| 3 3} 4 I* 2 31 2 lOf 1 3 1 8 200 and under Over 4 6 21 4 Hi 4 lli 4 4 4 Or 3 H 2 2 1 22 4 and under ... 7 61 6 Of 6 02 5 3} 4 11 3 9k 2 7| 1 6 General Average 6 11 5 6| 5 6J 4 10 4 6 3 5* 2 5 1 4i 1 These are the values of kw in the formula deduced as shewn. It may be seen that instead of the general average cost previously obtained for a, classes, amounting to 4s. 10d., the average cost in the special sex and age classes range; from Is. 4d., in the case of a child under two years of age, to 6s. lid. for an adul man. From the figures given in the above table the average cost of food can, of course be computed for any given family. Applying the results shewn in the table to variou families selected at random from the householders' returns, it is found that the diver gencies between the cost of food thus estimated and the average cost obtained from th weekly budgets are generally small. This indicates that the weights which have beei assigned are substantially in accordance with the facts. Thus, for a family in Ne\ South Wales, consisting of father, mother, and five children, aged 11, 8, 5, 4 and 1 year and having an income of over 200 a year, the estimated weekly cost of food, accordin: to the results given in the preceding table, is 25s. Id., whereas the actual average com puted from- the weekly budgets is 23s. lOd. Again, in the case of a family of elevei persons, also with an income of over 200, the estimated cost is 41s. l^d., as against ai actual cost of 42s. 5d.; and for a family of seven persons in Western Australia, wit! an income under 200 a year, the estimated cost is 27s., as against an actual averagi of 30s. lOd.- It is not practicable to obtain similar results for sex and age classes in regard t< expenditure on items other than food, owing to the difficulty in computing any satis EXPENDITURE. 19 factory system of weights accurately denoting the extent to which the various items are used or consumed by persons in the various classes. 6. Expenditure on Clothing. In the family budgets there was included a number of persons, such as boarders, servants, and adult children, whose clothing was not paid for out of the common fund. In order, therefore, to obtain particulars of the average cost per head these persons must- be excluded. The third column in the table hereunder shews the average number of persons whose expenditure on clothing was included in the returns, due allowance having been made for temporary absence from home. The succeeding columns shew the average weekly and the corresponding annual expenditure for the different income and family groups. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. AVERAGE WEEKLY AND ANNUAL EXPENDITURE PER HEAD ON CLOTHING. Numbers of Members. Number of Heads. Expenditure on Clothing. Families having Incomes of Per Week. Per Year. Over 200 ... 200 and under Over 4 4 and under Over 4 ... - ... 4 and under 328.3 118.9 253.7 184.1 s. d. 2 4 4 3i 1 5 2 3 S, s. d. 6 11 10 4 10 3 13 8 5 17 5 General Average 885.0 2 5 662 7. Expenditure on Other Items. The table hereunder shews the average weekly expenditure per family on items other than housing, food, clothing, and fuel and light, each of which, with the exception of the last, has been dealt with separately. Expendi- ture on fuel and light does not permit of further analysis. The percentage of each item on the total expenditure is also shewn. COST OF LIVING, 1910-11. AVERAGE WEEKLY EXPENDITURE PER FAMILY ON OTHER ITEMS. 11 I.- 1 . n m > O *8 2 43 11 X *S Families having Incomes of i gi3 ' 2 Number g o foS Members. ?* *? 5 ||l||l Alcoholi Beverage Tobacco Cigars, et ft to a Contributioi Benefit Socie Education (School Mate Medical Expense Rates and Tt 1 Sports an Amusemei Other Expenditu O AVERAGE WEEKLY EXPENDITURE. s. d. d R, d. d. s. d.!s. d. R. d. R. d. R. d. s. d. R. d. s. d. s. d. Over -200 Over 4 ...;-2 9* 3 9 5* 4 7 6 91 1 2 2 9 3 91 2 1* 22 4 2 9 14 200 and under 4 and under 2 24 Over 4 ... 1 10J 31 14 1 03 31 61 5* 3 -2ii4 10 1 41 81 1 3? 1 Of 1 7 4 2 8| 6| 5* 26 41 5 8| 2 9 71 15 6l 4 and under 1 84 1! 44 6* 1 9i i ioi 1 0* 4 1 51 1 1 6$ 8 34 19 21 General Average ...2 Ij 21 7 6 2 84 3 9 1 li 1 3 2 51 1 6| i li 15 04 1 12 5 PERCENTAGE ON TOTAL EXPENDITURE. 1 % % | % % % % % % % % % % % Over 200 Over 4 2.4ri 0.22 0.67 0.41 4.08 6.02 1.04 2.45 3.35 1.89 1.24 19.88 43.71 4 and under 91.15 0.27 1.04 0.51 3.13 4.72 1.24 1 .55 3.01 2.66 2.40 25.75 48.43 200 and under Over 4 3 33 0.221 0.49 08fi 9,40 3.04 1 91 O.fiO 9,.9fi 1.01 0.79 10.31 27.92 4 and under 3.21 0.27 0.70 1.02 3.33 3.57 2.00 0.62 2.70 2.04 1.02 15.68 36.16 General Average 2.67 0.26 0.74 0.63 3.41 4.72 1.41 1.57 3.09 1.97 1.41 18.94 40.82 20 EXPENDITURE. It may be seen that, disregarding " other expenditure," the most important item in the above table is expenditure on insurance, which is followed in the order named by fares, medical expenses, other groceries not food, rates and taxes, education and school materials, contributions to benefit societies and sports and amusements (equal) , alcoholic beverages, tobacco, cigars, etc., and non-alcoholic beverages. In view of the probability, previously referred to, that the budgets include a con-, siderable proportion of returns from householders whose habits are of a thrifty and economical nature, and who habitually exercise a careful supervision over their expendi- ture, it appears likely that the average amounts specified as being expended on various items especially on those which are of the nature of luxuries are somewhat too low to be representative of the general community. This view is also borne out by an examination of the individual budgets. Thus, in regard to alcoholic beverages, it appears that no less than 88 out of the 212 families were teetotallers. Of the balance 42 families spent on this item an average amount of less than 3d. per family per week, while there are only 15 families entered as spending over 2s. each a week. Of the last number nine exceeded 3s. each per week, and three exceeded 5s. a week. On non- alcoholic beverages the average weekly expenditure per family is only 2jd., while the average expenditure on sports and amusements is also very low, viz., Is. l^d. per week, 21 families returning no expenditure under this heading. Expenditure on tobacco is also small, the weekly average per family being 6d. There are only 81 families with a weekly expenditure in excess of that sum, while 103 families returned no expenditure 011 this item. The relatively high expenditure on insurance and contributions to benefit societies, amounting together to 6.13 per cent, on the total expenditure, indicates thrift and economy. "Other expenditure" includes a considerable variety of miscellaneous items, such as servants' wages, furniture, repairs and maintenance of property, holiday expenses, and any other outlay not specifically mentioned under any other heading. The percentage on total expenditure ranges from 10.31 for larger families in the smaller income group to 25.15 for small families with larger incomes. 8. Conclusion. It is to be regretted that in an inquiry of such importance, and so closely touching the interests of the majority of the community, the response of the public in furnishing budgets of income and expenditure has been so limited. In a similar inquiry carried out in the United States of America in 1902, data were obtained as to cost of living for one year from 25,440 families, representing 124,108 persons. Many interesting investigations and important analysis could thus be carried out. Again in Germany, in 1907, schedules were distributed to 4134 families, of which 960, or 23.2 per cent., filled in the particulars for the full period of twelve months, while 699 families, or 16.9 per cent., persevered for from six to eleven months. The results of the inquiry in Australia compare very unfavourably with those in the countries mentioned, only 178, or 9.4 per cent., on the total number distributed (1500), having persevered for the full period of twelve months, and 20 families, or 1.1 per cent., for from six to eleven months. The result in those countries where the people respond willingly to inquiries of this nature is that a better knowledge of sociological and economic sonditions is acquired, and the possibility of directing national development on scientific lines is enhanced. In the United States and Germany especially, it appears that the masses of the community are beginning to realise that, in so far as sociological knowledge can con- tribute to national success, that people have the position of advantage whose investi- gators discover the largest body of scientific truth, and whose practical men are the most prompt in the application of it in social organisation. A movement has recently been set on foot for an inquiry into the cost of living on an international basis. If such an inquiry be carried out in all its bearings the results should go far towards elucidating several important matters in regard to which the information at present available is meagre and unsatisfactory. UNIVEESITY OF CALIFOENIA LIBRARY, BERKELEY THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW Books not returned on time are subject to a fine of 50c per volume after the third day overdue, increasing to $1.00 per volume after the sixth day. Books not in demand may be renewed if application is made before expiration of loan period. MM 31 34- RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY Bldg. 400, Richmond Field Station University of California Richmond, CA 94804-4698 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 2-month loans may be renewed by calling (510)642-6753 1-year loans may be recharged by bringing books to NRLF Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due date. DUE AS STAMPED BELOW JUL22J999 12,000(11/95)