REESE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. ELEMENTS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY A TREATISE OF THE ACTIVITIES AND NATURE OF 'THE MIND FROM THE PHYSICAL AND EXPEEIMENTAL POINT OF VIEW BY GEOEGE T. LADD PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN YALE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK CHAKLES SCKIBNEK'S SONS 1887 ' QP3, BIG LIBRARY G COPYRIGHT, 1887, BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS TROW'8 riNG AND BOOKBINDING COMPANY, NEW YORK. PREFACE. THERE can be no doubt that an important movement in psychol- ogy has arisen in recent times through the effort to approach the phenomena of mind from the experimental and physiological point of view. Different students of psychological science will estimate differently both the net result already reached by this effort and the promise of further additions to the sum of our knowledge from continued investigation of the same kind. Some writers have cer- tainly indulged in extravagant claims as to the past triumphs of so- called Physiological Psychology, and in equally extravagant expec- tations as to its future discoveries. On the other hand, a larger number, perhaps, have been inclined either to fear or to depreciate every attempt to mingle the methods, laws, and speculations of the physical sciences with the study of the human soul. These latter apparently anticipate that some discovery in the localization of cerebral function, or in psychonietry, may jeopard the birthright of man as a spiritual and rational being. Or possibly they wish to regard the soul as separated, by nature and with respect to its modes of action, from the material body in such a way as to render it impossible to understand more of the one by learning more about the other. As a result of some years of study of the general subject, I express with considerable confidence the opinion that there is no ground for extravagant claims or expectations, and still less ground for any fear of consequences. In all cases of new and somewhat rankly growing scientific enterprises, it is much the better way to waive the discus- sion of actual or possible achievements, as well as of welcomed or dreaded revelations of new truth, and proceed at once to the busi- ness on hand. It is proposed in this book to follow this better way. It will be the task of the book itself to set forth the assured or al- leged results of Physiological Psychology ; and this will be done at iv PEEFACE. every step with such degree of assurance as belongs to the evidence hitherto attainable upon the particular subject discussed. "With declamation, either in attack or defence of the " old psychology," of the " introspective method," etc., one may dispense without seri- ous loss. The study of the phenomena of consciousness by the method here proposed necessarily requires some acquaintance with a consider- able circuit of sciences which are not usually all alike closely allied. The number of scholars who can form opinions with equal freedom and confidence in all of these sciences is very small. Moreover, since all psycho-physical laws are supposed as the very term indi- cates to govern the correlations of phenomena of consciousness with phenomena of the nervous system, a peculiar mystery belongs to much of the domain within which psycho-physical science is com- pelled to move. These facts may fitly, on the one hand, excite caution in the writer ; and, on the other hand, excuse him for many inevitable failures to set forth with perfect definiteness and confi- dence the conclusions he has to propose. Much will be said that must be accepted as provisional, as only probably true. Much room must also be made for conjecture and speculation. What is most important, however, is that conjecture should not be put forth as ascertained fact, or speculation as unquestioned law. It would have been a great assistance to me if I had had more predecessors in the path which I am to take. But with the ex- ception of Wundt's masterly work (Grundzuge der physiologischen Psychologic, second edition in 1880), no one book has attempted to cover, even in a summary way, the entire ground. The number of monographs, however, which have dealt with individual questions subordinate to, or part of, the main inquiry is very great. These two facts also render the attempt at a general survey of Physiolog- ical Psychology for readers of English both peculiarly attractive and peculiarly difficult. I can only indulge the hope that I have done something toward breaking this path and rendering it easier and more secure, both for myself and for others, in the future. The investigators and authors to whom I am under obligations for material upon the various questions discussed, or statements made, in this book are by no means all mentioned by name. Of course, much of what is said on the structure of the nervous system, and on the phenomena of sensation and perception, has already become part of that general fund of facts and laws which belongs alike to all students of the subject. But by quoting certain author- PREFACE. V ities in the text, and by a few (in comparison with the number which might have been cited) references in foot-notes, I have con- nected some of the discoveries and views of modern psycho -physical science with their authors. These may serve somewhat as guide to those persons who wish to pursue such studies still further. I am under particular obligations to Dr. James K. Thacher, Pro- fessor of Physiology in the Yale Medical School, for valuable as- sistance in that description of the Nervous Mechanism, its structure and functions, which the First Part of the book contains. If I have escaped the mistake of assuming to teach more than is really known upon this subject, it has been in large measure due to his friendly and skilful guidance. Valuable assistance has also been received from Russell H. Chittenden, Professor of Physiological Chemistry, and Charles S. Hastings, Professor of Physics both of the Sheffield Scientific School. The method and arrangement of the book have been chosen so as to fit it for use, both as a text-book by special students of the subjects of which it treats, and also by the general reader who is interested in knowing what results have been reached by the more modern and even the latest psycho-physical researches. GEORGE T. LADD. YALE UNIVERSITY, NEW HAVEN, February, 1887. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION. . . 1-14 PART FIRST. THE NERVOUS MECHANISM. CHAPTER I. THE ELEMENTS OP THE NERVOUS SYSTEM 17-55 1-4, General Function of the Nervous System. 5-16, Chem- ical Constitution of the Nervous Elements. 17-30, Structural Form of the Nervous Elements. 31-36, Common Properties of the Nervous Elements. CHAPTER II. COMBINATION OP THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS INTO A SYSTEM 56-101 1-3, Threefold Plan of the Nervous System. 4, The Sympa- thetic and Cerebro-spinal Systems. 5, Membranes of Brain and Spinal Cord. 6-12, Structure of the Spinal Cord. 13-14, General Arrangement of the Encephalon. 15, Structure of the Medulla Oblongata. 16, Structure of the Cerebellum. 17, Struct- ure of the Pons Varolii. 18-24, Structure of the Cerebrum. | 25-27, Cortex of the Cerebral Hemispheres. 28-29, Arrange- ment of the Nerve-Tracts. 30, The Cranial and Spinal Nerves. CHAPTER III. THE NERVES AS CONDUCTORS 102-129 1-3, General Office of the Nerves. 4, The Nerve-Muscle Ma- chine. 5-8, The Conditions of Neural Action. 9-19, Phenom- ena induced in the Nerves by different Stimuli. 20-23, Electrical and other Processes in the excited Nerve-Stretch. 24-26, Laws Vlll TABLE OF CONTENTS. of the Nerve-Commotion. 27, Speed of the Nerve-Commotion. 28, Effect of Section. 29, Nervous Conduction in the Central Or- gans.^ 30-32, Paths of Conduction in the Spinal Cord. 33-35, Paths of Conduction in the Brain. CHAPTER IV. PAGE AUTOMATIC AND REFLEX FUNCTIONS OP THE CENTRAL ORGANS.. 130-162 1-2, Nature and Kinds of Reflex Action. 3-5, The Spinal Cord as a Central Organ. 6-9, Laws of Spinal Reflexes. 10, Irregular Automatism of the Cord. 11, Centres of the Cord. 12, Excitability of the Cord. 13, Inhibition of the Cord. 14, The Brain as a Central Organ. 15-16, Functions of the Medulla Ob- longata. 17-19, Centres of the Medulla Oblongata. 20, Influ- ence of the Cerebral Lobes. 21, Functions of the Cerebellum. 22-27, Functions of the Basal Ganglia. 28, Gray Matter of the Third Ventricle. CHAPTER V. END-ORGANS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM 163-197 1-2, Characteristics of the End-Organs. 3, The Kinds of End- Organs. ^ 4-5, The End-Organs of Smell. 6-7, The End-Or- gans of Taste. 8-10, The End-Organs of Touch. 11, The End- Organ of Sight. 12-16, Tunics, Media, and Appendages of the Eye. 17, The Mechanism of Accommodation. 18-21, Structure and Functions of the Retina. 22, Photo-Chemistry of Vision. 23-26, External and Middle Ear. 27, Structure of the Labyrinth. 28, End-Apparatus of the Vestibule. 29, The Organ of Corti. 30-31, Problem solved by the Labyrinth. 32, End-Organs of Motion. CHAPTER VI. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NERVOUS MECHANISM 198-213 1, Nature of Embryonic Life. 2-5, Earliest Development of the Ovum. 6-8, Blastodermic Layers and their Differentia. !)- 11, Head-Fold and Brain-Vesicles. 12, Development of Cranial and Spinal Nerves. 13-15, Subsequent Development of the Brain. 16-17, Development of Eye and Ear. 18, Histogenetic Changes in the Embryo. 19, Conclusions. CHAPTER VII. MECHANICAL THEORY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM 214-236 1, Machine-like Nature of the Body. 2-6, The Nervous Sys- tem as a Mechanism. 7, Summation and Interference in Nerves. 8, Evidence from the Electrical Phenomena. 9, Theory of du Bois-Reymond. 10-11, Theory of Hermann. g 12-13, Theory of Wundt. 14-15, General Conclusions as to a Mechanical Theory. TABLE OF CONTENTS. ix PART SECOND. CORRELATIONS OF THE NERVOUS MECH- ANISM AND THE MIND. CHAPTER I. PAGE THE LOCALIZATION OF CEREBRAL FUNCTION 239-262 1-3, Proofs of the Brain's Special Significance. 4-7, The Brain as a Measure of Intelligence. 8, Special Significance of the Cerebral Hemispheres. 9-10, The Question of Localization. 11-13, The History of Discovery. 14-16, The Evidence from Experiment. 17, The Evidence from Pathology. 18, The Evi- dence from Anatomy. 19, True Method of Investigation. CHAPTER II. THE LOCALIZATION OF CEREBRAL FUNCTION [Continued] 263-302 1-4, Difficulties from Negative Cases. 5-6, Experiments in Stimulation. 7, Experiments in Extirpation. Sj 8-9, Nature of so-called Motor Centres. 10-15, Method and Results of Exner. 16, Confirmatory Conclusions from other Sources. 17, The Evi- dence of Histology. 18, Relation of Motion and Sensibility. 19- 21, Visual and Auditory Centres of Ferrier and Munk. 22, Ex- ner's Cerehral Field of Vision. 23, Relations between the Retinas and the Cerebrum. 24, Localization of Smell and Taste. 25- 27, The Phenomena of Aphasia. 28, Cerebral Lesions in Aphasia. 29, Conjectures as to the Frontal Lobes. 30, Negative Conclu- sions of Goltz. 31, Conclusion as to three leading Principles. CHAPTER III. THE QUALITY OF SENSATIONS 303-324 1-5, Sensations and Things. 6, The Subjects investigated. 7, Specific Energy of the Nerves. 8-11, Sensations of Smell. 12-15, Sensations of Taste. 16-17, The Varieties of Sound. 18-20, The Pitch of Tones. 21-22, The Composition of Clangs. 23, Analysis of Sounds by the Ear. CHAPTER IV. THE QUALITY OF SENSATIONS [Continued] 325-355 1, Analysis of Sensations of Sight. 2-3, The Stimulus of Sight. 4, Relation of Quality and Quantity. 5-8, The Different Color- TABLE OF CONTENTS. Tones. 9, The Complementary Colors. 10-13, Conditions of Changes in Color. 14, Phenomena of Contrast. 15-17, Theories of Visual Sensations. 18, Symbolism of Visual Sensations. 19, Sensations of the Skin. 20, The Muscular Sensations. 21/Sen- sations of Pressure. 22-24, Sensations of Temperature. 25, Specific Energy of the Nerves. CHAPTER V. PAQB THE QUANTITY OF SENSATIONS , 356-381 1-3, Distinction of Variations in Quantity. 4-5, The Meas- urement of Sensations. 6, Nature of the Least Observable Differ- ence. 7, The Determining of the Limits. 8, Methods of Experi- ment. 9, Statement of Weber's Law. 10, Measurement of Sensations of Pressure. 11, Measurement of Sensations of Tem- perature. 12-15, The Intensity of Sounds. 16-18, The In- tensity of Visual Sensations. 19-21, Measurement of Taste and Smell". 22-23, Value of Weber's Law. CHAPTER VI. THE PRESENTATIONS OF SENSE 382-419 1-2, Sensations and Things. 3, General Nature of the Pres- entations of Sense. 4-5, Laws of the Synthesis of Sensations. 6-7, Nativistic and Empiristic Theories. 8-11, Nature of the Spatial Series. 12-15, The Theory of Local Signs. 16, The Stages of Perception. 17, Perceptions of Smell. 18, Perceptions of Taste. 19-20, Perceptions of Hearing. 21-22, Sense of Lo- cality by the Skin. 23-25, Weber's Sensation-Circles. 26, The Discernment of Motion. 27, Localizing of Temperature-Sensa- tions. 28, Localizing of Muscular Sensations. 29-30, Construc- tion of the Field of Touch. 31, Feelings of Double Contact. CHAPTER VII. THE PRESENTATIONS OF SENSE [Continued] 420-467 1, General Principles applied to the Eye. 2, Data or Motifs of Vision. 3-6, Nature of the Primary Retinal Field. 7, Value of the Retinal Elements. 8-9, Motions of the Eye. 10, The Law of Listing. 11, Meridians of the Field of Vision. 12, Effect of Accommodation. 13-16, Single and Double Images. 17, The Fixation of Attention. 18-20, Stereoscopic Vision and Vision of Perspective. Vg 21-23, The Use of Secondary Helps. 24-25, General Office of Experience. 26-28, Judgment of Spatial Exten- sion and Relations. $ 29, Visual Perception of Motion. 30-34, Errors of Sense. 35, Development of Visual Perception. PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY. ESTTKODUCTIOK 1. A CLEAB conception of Physiological Psychology requires some special knowledge of the nature and methods of those two sci- ences, the results of whose investigation it endeavors to combine. These sciences are, of course, Psychology and Physiology the latter being understood in a broad way as including also various applica- tions of the general theory of physics to the functions of the animal organism. But as the form taken by this compound term would itself seem to indicate, the two do not stand upon precisely the same level in effecting this combination, whether we consider the end that the one science into which both enter desires to reach, or the means that it employs to reach the end. For the noun ("psychology") in the compound term may be said more particu- larly to define the end desired; the adjective ("physiological") the character of the means which it is proposed especially to em- ploy. Hence "Physiological Psychology " can scarcely claim to be an independent science, or even a definite branch of the science of psychology in general. It is rather to be regarded simply as psychol- ogy approached and studied from a certain the so-called fl physi- ological " side or point of view. It is necessary, then, in the first place, to define what we understand by the science of psychology, and how it is proposed to treat this science as subject to the physi- ological method, and as approached by means of physiological ex- perimentation and researches. 2. Perhaps the most common definition of psychology, up to the present time, has regarded it as " the science of the human soul." If this definition had always been given, on beginning the pursuit of the science, only in a provisional way, and with the implied or open confession that it is the business of psychology itself to de- monstrate the existence of a particular entity called " the soul," and 2 INTRODUCTION. to show how this entity is needed to explain the phenomena of con- sciousness, then little valid objection could have been made to it. But such has by no means been the case. For example, one writer on the subject (Drbal), at the very commencement of his treatise, asserts that "psychology is the science of the human soul as the real foundation of the spiritual life ; " and another (Erd- mann) declares that " the subject-matter of psychology is the sub- jective spirit," meaning by this term the human soul. Objections have, therefore, been more or less fitly and forcefully urged agninst this definition as ordinarily employed. It has been said that clearly we have no right to assume any such entity as the soul ; and even that a careful study of all the phenomena especially by the experimental and physiological method does not compel or induce us to conclude that such entity exists. It has been claimed, espe- cially of late, that there may be a " psychology without a soul," and, indeed, that this kind of psychology is alone worthy of being con- sidered truly scientific. Further objection to the same definition has been made in other quarters, because it seems to regard the question as settled, whether man has not more than one subject (or "ground") of the manifold phenomena called psychical ; whether, in fact, he may not be the fortunate possessor of both an " animal " and a "rational" soul, etc. It would be aside from the course of our inquiries to consider these objections in detail at this time ; or to state at any length how far we are inclined to agree with them and how far to express dissent. They may all be, for the present, set aside by stating the course of procedure which the study of psy- chology from the physiological point of view seems to us plainly to recommend. The satisfactory definition of any science is often one of the latest and most difficult achievements of that science. When such defini- tion is placed at the beginning of an investigation, it must often really include results reached only by going carefully and repeatedly over the entire ground of the science. In all such cases the learner of the science is quite unable fully to comprehend the definition, or to understand the positions upon various disputed questions which it may really involve. In general, then, it is better that the earliest so-called definition should be simply a description of that class of phenomena which it is proposed, as far as possible, to isolate for purposes of inquiry. This remark applies with peculiar force to psychology, both on account of such objections as those mentioned above, and also on account of certain difficulties inherent in the subject itself. Accordingly, it will serve our purpose best to "de- fine " this science simply by ascribing to it a certain more or less INTRODUCTION. definite sphere of phenomena. Thus we shall consider psychology as that science which has for its primary subject of investigation all the phenomena of human consciousness, or of the sentient life of man. If the term " sentience " be employed as preferable to con- sciousness, it must be understood as equivalent to consciousness in the broader sense of the latter word. This definition, or rather de- scription, plainly implies an acquaintance experimentally with cer- tain phenomena that cannot, strictly speaking, be defined. These are the phenomena of consciousness ; and one result of all our sub- sequent investigations will be to show us that consciousness and its primary phenomena can never be defined. The definition of psychology need not, however, be understood to imply the real existence of any one entity such as a soul. Nevertheless it would be very inconvenient, not to say impos- sible, to begin and continue the investigation of psychical phenom- ena, using only roundabout phrases through fear of implying the real existence of some spiritual entity called the Soul or the Mind. In some sort there cannot be any description, much less any scien- tific study, of the phenomena of consciousness without implying somewhat which requires us to use a word like these. In all lan- guages, and in the constant everyday use of them all, men in stating and describing the phenomena of their own sentient life employ such terms as "I" and "me," and place in a kind of contrast with them such other terms as "thou" and "he " or "it." Inasmuch as recollection, and the assumption of some kind of continuous personal identity, enter into all their experience, and underlie all their relations with each other and with the physical world which surrounds them, they are compelled to use language implying a permanent subject of the phenomena of consciousness. No one doubts as to his right to ascribe to himself the phenomena of his own consciousness ; and as well to ascribe certain other phenom- ena, which are not attributed to himself as their subject, to other subjects (so-called " persons "), which he supposes to have, each one, a consciousness of his own. No one doubts that this subject is in every case somehow the same with itself from hour to hour and day to day, and even from year to year. In all the earlier part of this treatise the word "mind" will be employed simply as the equiva- lent of the subject (which all language as expressive of universal experience necessarily recognizes) of the phenomena of conscious- ness. In other words, whatever all men inevitably mean by the word "I" (the empirical ego of philosophy), whenever they say / think, or feel, or intend this or that ; and whatever they under- stand others to mean by using similar language thus mueh, and 4 INTRODUCTION. no more, we propose at first to include under the term "mind." This term is preferred to the word " soul," in part out of concession to the prejudices to which allusion has already been made, and in part because it seems to admit of the handling which it is proposed to give to it subsequently, with more freedom from entangling alli- ances with ethical, social, and religious ideas. In other words, w r e wish to begin and continue as far as possible upon purely scientific grounds. And when, subsequently, these grounds are in part aban- doned for certain fields of rational speculation, we wish to have the connection between the two kept open and unimpeded. 3. In accordance with what has already been said concerning the nature of psychology, we may define Physiological Psychology as the science which investigates the phenomena of human con- sciousness from the " physiological " point of view or method of approach. Remembering the cautions which have already been expressed, we may also say that it is the science of the Immjuynind as investigated by means of its relations ioTthe human physical or- ganism. A more accurate definition, however, requires that some- thing further should be said concerning the nature and method of that science which furnishes the adjective to our compound term. Human Physiology is the science of the functions (or modes of the behavior in its correlated action) of the human physical organism. As studied at present it implies an acquaintance with the fields of gross and special microscopic anatomy (histology), of embryology and the general doctrine of development, of biology, including the allied phenomena of plant life, of molecular physics and chemistry as related to the structure and action of the bodily tissues, and of other forms of kindred knowledge. It is only a relatively small part of this vast domain, however, with which Physiological Psychology has directly to deal ; for it is only a part of the human organism which has any direct relation to the phenomena of consciousness. As will appear subsequently, it is with the nervous system alone that our science has its chief immediate concern. Indeed it might be described though in a still somewhat indefinite, but more full and complete, way as the science which investigates the correla- tions that exist between the structure and functions of the human nervous mechanism and the phenomena of consciousness, and which derives therefrom conclusions as to the laws and nature of the mind. 4. Physiology is compelled, from its very nature as a physical science, to regard the nervous system as a mechanism. Physiological Psychology, inasmuch as it relies so largely upon physiology for its data and method and points of view, is also required to consider INTRODUCTION. 5 this system in the same way. Those unique relations in which the structure and functions of the nervous substance of the body stand to the phenomena of the mind cannot deter the investigator from as- suming toward it the so-called mechanical point of view. Physiology presents psychology with a description of this nervous substance as a vast and complex system of material molecules, which are acted upon by different forms of the energy of nature outside (external stimuli), and by intimate changes in the contiguous molecules of the other substances of the ftody (internal stimuli) ; and which be- have as they do on account of the influences thus received, as well as on account of their own molecular constitution and arrangement. But all this is the description of a material mechanism. The word "mechanism " is preferable to the word " machine" for describing such a system of interacting molecules as constitute the living ner- vous substance, because we attach to the latter word the mental pict- ure of something which has a certain magnitude and rigidity of parts that act and react upon each other in a palpable way under the ordinary laws of mechanics. A steam-engine is a machine w r hose parts may be seen to push and pull and turn each other after the ordinary fashion of all levers and wheels. But the molecules of the steam, from the activity of which all the motion of the rigid and ponderous parts of this machine is derived, are no less mate- rial and governed by physical law in their changing relations to each other than are the masses of the machine itself. The inter- action of the minute particles of the steam falls more fitly, how- ever, under the conception of mechanism. Indeed, it is only as falling under this general conception that these molecules admit of any scientific treatment at all. Now it is not our purpose to begin the consideration of the human nervous system by debating the question, how completely it falls under the conception of mechan- ism, and whether some other conception be not needed to supple- ment this when the unique relations of this system to the phenomena of the mind are taken into account. Whatever is to be said upon such a question must appear in its proper place in the order adopted for the discussion of the general subject. Physiological Psychology, however, can scarcely establish itself at all unless it be willing to receive from the proper one of the two sciences which enter into it that conception of the nervous system at which this science has arrived as the result of the most successful modern researches. As far as the nervous system admits of being subjected at all to scientific treatment, for the purpose of attaining a more complete knowledge of the nature of its functions, it is necessarily considered as a com- plex molecular mechanism. We shall, then, receive, in a grateful 6 INTRODUCTION. and docile manner, all that the noble science of human physiology has to teach us, under the guidance of the conception of a mech- anism, both directly concerning the manner in which the nervous matter of the human body performs its wonderful functions, and more indirectly concerning the relations in which these functions stand to the phenomena of consciousness. 5. Physiological Psychology it is by this time apparent par- takes of the nature and methods of two sciences that differ widely from each other. One is a science which involves introspection ; for it is only by the method of introspection that the real and pres- ent facts of human consciousness can be reached. The other is a physical science, and involves external observation to determine the external facts of the structure, development, and functions of a physical mechanism. Two sets of phenomena must then be exam- ined in their relations to each other, and, so far as possible, the laws (or permanent modes) of these relations pointed out. It is due to this fact, in part, that both the peculiar difficulties and the peculiar interest and value of psycho-physical researches are so great. In every science a beginning is first made by ascertaining and comparing together all the important phenomena ; the laws, or regular modes of the occurrence of the phenomena in relation to each other, are then investigated ; and, finally, certain conclusions are drawn concerning the nature and significance of those real be- ings which reason compels us to assume as permanent subjects of the different classes of phenomena. In its effort to establish itself upon a scientific basis, Physiological Psychology has no choice but to follow essentially the same method of procedure. In its case, however, as has already been remarked, the phenomena which are to be ascertained and compared belong to two orders that obviously differ greatly from each other ; and the laws which it is sought to discover are laws which maintain themselves between these two or- ders of phenomena. The phenomena of the nervous system, like all physical phenomena, consist in changes in the constitution and mutual relation of material masses and molecules. They are, then, of a kind to be related to each other, under the conception of mech- anism, inside of the nervous system and of the entire human body ; and also, outside of the body, to the various forms of physical energy in nature which act upon these masses and molecules. But the psychical phenomena are states of consciousness, constantly shifting modes of the behavior of that subject which we have agreed as much as possible without involving any premature assumptions to call the Mind. Still the above-mentioned two orders of phenomena INTRODUCTION. 7 are obviously to a large extent related to each other ; they may, in fact, be said to be correlated in a unique manner. The constant forms of this correlation constitute the laws for the discovery of which Physiological Psychology undertakes its special researches. It endeavors to bring the two orders of phenomena face to face, to look at them as they stand thus related to each other, and, as far as possible, to unite them in terms of a uniform character, under law. It might seem that simply to attempt the accomplishment of the task just described should satisfy all legitimate demands. And, indeed, no little protest has of late been made against any attempt on the part of scientific psychology (and how much more when studied from the physiological and experimental point of view) to proceed further than this. All inquirers have been warned, not only against introducing metaphysical assumptions into the beginnings of psychology, but also against allowing any admixture of the two during the investigations pursued by the latter. We have, indeed, just agreed that metaphysical assumptions as to the nature of mind should prejudice as little as possible our statement of psychological facts and laws. But if the warning against so-called " metaphysics " be understood to mean that inquiry must be stopped when the phenomena and their uniform modes of relation have been enume- rated, and that no venture must be made upon any discussions or conclusions regarding the real nature of the subject of them all (the mind), such warning may very well be quietly disregarded. What we are chiefly interested in, on undertaking all psychological investigation, is the real nature the permanent characteristics, the claims to be a substantial existence, a spiritual unity and the ori- gin and destiny of the mind. To assume as little as possible con- cerning all this, at the first, is simply a matter of wise reserve and self-control in the interests of scientific investigation. We feel no hesitancy, however, in announcing our intention, ultimately, to draw whatever conclusions seem to us legitimate and desirable con- cerning many of these so-called "metaphysical" inquiries. Psy- chology no less truly when studied from the physiological and ex- perimental point of view has the undoubted right, and is under the obligation, to contribute as much as possible toward the solu- tion of these inquiries. Nor do observation and wide reading show that the advocates of " psychology without a soul," and freed from all metaphysics, are at all certain to avoid drawing con- clusions, not to say introducing illegitimate assumptions, upon these very same inquiries. In brief, Physiological Psychology has the right, which belongs to it as a science, to introduce whatever conclusions as to the nature of mind follow legitimately from its 8 INTRODUCTION. discussions of phenomena and laws. It has even a right to in- dulge in well-founded and reasonable speculation. Such things are not necessarily objectionable when indulged in by any of the more purely physical sciences. Indeed, there is not one of these sciences which would not look comparatively bare and unattractive if wholly stripped of its more or less questionable inferences, its metaphysi- cal assumptions, its guessings, and speculations. 6. The remarks immediately foregoing serve to indicate what are the principal Divisions of this work. The First Part will consist of a description of the structure and functions of the Ner- vous System. This system will there be considered under the conception of a mechanism, and as far as possible without any direct or indirect reference to the phenomena of consciousness as determined by introspection. The Second Part will describe the various classes of " correlations which exist between the phenomena of the nervous mechanism and mental phenomena. It will also attempt to state what is known of the laws which maintain themselves over these various classes. No attempt will be made, however, to describe and discuss any of the phenomena which may be classed as abnormal, or as consisting (so far as they are psychical) in so-called " disturbances of consciousness," except when reference to such abnormal phenomena is necessary in order to explain those which are called ordinary or normal. The phenomena of insanity, delirium, hypnotism, somnambulism, ecstasy, mind-reading, spir- itualism, and even of sleep and dreaming, will therefore be defi- nitely excluded. The chief reason for such exclusion is to be found in a lack of space, it being difficult even to bring within the limits of a single volume a sufficiently thorough discussion of the more ordinary phenomena with which Physiological Psychology is called upon to deal. The various correlations of the mind and the nervous mechanism (of which the Second Part treats) may be conveniently consid- ered under several principal groups or classes. The first of these includes more particularly such relations as can be established be- tween the condition and activity of the supreme nervous centres and the phenomena of conscious sensation and volition. Most of what can be said at present upon this point may be summed up in the discussion of the localization of cerebral function, as taken in connection with the description of the automatic and reflex action of these centres considered as parts of the nervous mechanism. The second class of these correlations covers all the phenomena with which psycho-physics (in the more precise use of the term) attempts to deal. It discusses the relations which exist between the quality, INTRODUCTION. 9 quantity, combination, and order of succession in time, of the vari- ous stimuli which act upon the nervous system, and the kind, mag- nitude, composite result, and time-relations of the mental phe- nomena. Hence the significance of the term psycho-physics. As Physiological Psychology is ordinarily and legitimately treated, it includes these more specially psycho-physical researches. An- other class of these correlations covers certain related phenomena of mind and body as dependent upon age, sex, race, etc. Besides the foregoing groups, or classes, certain observations which have more or less of scientific confirmation and value, may be made regarding the physical basis of the feelings and voli- tions controlling the bodily members, and of the higher faculties of memory, association of ideas, etc. The Third Part will fitly intro- duce, at the close of the psycho-physical researches, the presenta- tion of such conclusions as may be legitimately gathered, or more speculatively inferred, concerning the nature (considered as a real being) of the human mind. The justification of the order and ex- tent of the entire discussion, and especially of the Third Part as a whole, has already been given to some extent ; the rest must be left to the progress and result of the discussion itself. 7. It has already been said that the peculiarity of Physiological Psychology, considered as a branch of the general science of mind, consists largely in the method of its approach to its subject. At- tention must now be more specifically called to this method as necessarily partaking of the methods of the two sciences whose researches it undertakes to combine. The method of physiology, which is in general that of extern al jjbservation as employed in all the physical sciences, should be applied only when supplemented by the many delicate and accurate instruments of observation now at command, and guarded and checked by that accumulation of expe- rience concerning the best ways of studying nature and concern- ing her ways of working which the whole body of such sciences has made. On the other hand, the method of psychology has or- dinarily been defined as solely the method of introspection or self- consciousness. These two methods are obviously very different. It would not be strange, then, if the science which finds it neces- sary to combine the two should experience some special difficulty. This difficulty has, however, more often been exaggerated than ex- plained and (what is quite possible) for the most part removed. Our present purpose does not require that we should examine at length the question whether the introspective method is the only one possible in psychology. Scarcely more is necessary than the statement of the bearing of this question upon the inquiries it 10 INTRODUCTION. is proposed to make. There should in general be no mystery or arrogant assumption about the use of such words as "science" and "scientific method." Science is nothing but knowledge real, veri- fiable, and systematic. Scientific method is nothing but the way of arriving at such knowledge. Now, although Physiological Psy- chology brings the investigator face to face with some of the most interesting and distinctive mysteries, it is not, as a science, to be regarded as especially mysterious. Inasmuch as its specific busi- ness is to ascertain and combine, under definite laws, two widely differing classes of facts (facts of the human nervous mechanism and facts of human consciousness) it is, of course, compelled, first of all, to ascertain both kinds of facts. The phenomena of consciousness, as primary facts, can be ascertained in no other way than in and by consciousness itself. Whatever fault may be found with the so- called introspective method in psychology, on account of its alleged inaccuracy, lack of scientific and progressive quality, etc., from the very nature of the case no other way of ascertaining what the phe- nomena of consciousness in themselves are can ever take the place of the direct examination of consciousness. And there is no way of directly examining consciousness but the way of being conscious one's self. On the other hand, it is perfectly obvious to students of psychology and of its history (on grounds which need not be stated here) that the scientific treatment of the facts of conscious- ness can never be, to any satisfactory extent, accomplished by in- trospection alone. For psychology, in order to make valid its claim to be a science, must not merely display the alleged facts of individ- ual mental experience ; it must treat these facts analytically, must resolve them into their ultimate factors, and trace the stages of their development from what is simpler to what is more complex ; it must also show on all sides their connections and causes, thus placing the phenomena of the mind as much as possible in interac- tion with the rest of the world. It is because human physiology can contribute largely to such scientific treatment (as distinguished from the mere observation, grouping, and cataloguing) of the phenomena of the mind that it is entitled to be considered as furnishing one distinctive and fruitful branch of psychological researches. 8. The following statements will, accordingly, be found to hold good concerning the method of Physiological Psychology. It must employ faithfully the methods distinctive of both the two sciences which it endeavors to combine. Facts as to the structure and functions of the nervous mechanism, and as to the effect upon it of various kinds of physical energy acting as stimuli, must be ascer- tained by external observation. In general they must be accepted INTRODUCTION. 11 by us as contributed from the modern science of human physiology. The primary facts of consciousness must be ascertained from con- sciousness itself ; or, since they have already been for a long time subjected to this form of observation, and tabulated, compared, and classified, they may be accepted from the science of introspective psychology. Care must be taken, however, to make sure that all alleged psychical facts are really facts ; but upon this point, again, there is no other way of making sure than in and through conscious- ness. The principal laws and inferences also of introspective psy- chology may be accepted (at least in a provisional way) on begin- ning the study of Physiological Psychology. The final result of such study will doubtless be, not only to supplement and explain, but also to modify and correct, the statement of these laws and in- ferences. But here, as in other scientific research, we are obliged to work our way through many mistakes, obscurities, and other ob- stacles, progressively nearer the complete and verifiable knowledge of the truth. Furthermore, from the nature of the case, Physiological Psychol- ogy takes its point of starting from the facts and laws of physiology as reached by the method of external observation. This follows necessarily from the relation in which the two sciences of physiol- ogy and psychology stand as entering into the proposed combina- tion. The enlargement of our knowledge of the latter is the end to be reached ; but the former is to give us the way by which, and the guidance under which, the approach to this end must be made. It will also become evident, in the course of the following inves- tigation, that we are seldom or never able to proceed directly with the work of comparing the immediate physical antecedents or con- sequents of the mental phenomena with these phenomena them- selves, and so of drawing conclusions at once as to the laws by which the two classes of facts are connected. Such immediate an- tecedents and consequents are hid in the inexplorable recesses of the living and moiecularly active brain. It is seldom, indeed, that our direct observation can approach within the tenth, or it may be within the hundredth, remove of what goes on in these recesses. We are obliged to examine the physical phenomena from a greater dis- tance and in a more indirect way. For example, physics can inform us what combinations of what wave-lengths of the vibration of ether fall on the eye when a certain form of conscious sensation, which we call "yellow " or "red " or "blue " arises ; physiology can lo- cate the nervous elements of the retina upon which the waves fall, can conjecture something as to the chemical changes there produced, 12 INTEODUCTION. imd trace doubtfully the paths along which the resulting nervous impulses rise to the brain and diffuse themselves over certain of its areas ; psycho-physics can tell approximately the relations in which the varying quantities of the stimulus stand to the resulting degrees of the sensations. But in all this we are still at a great dis- tance from the enjoyment of those opportunities which would seem necessary to make the science of Physiological Psychology as com- prehensive and exact as could readily be wished. As a rule, certain kinds and amounts of physical energy, more or less definitely meas- urable, are known to be acting on the peripheral parts of the body, and the next series of observed facts is the emergence in conscious- ness of a psychical experience quite unlike all kinds of physical en- ergy. To be sure, Fechner's ' conception of psycho-physics is that it treats those "physical activities which are the bearers ( Tr tiger) or conditions of the psychical, and accordingly stand in direct func- tional relation with them ; " or again, " psycho-physics is an exact doctrine of the relations of function or dependence between body and soul of the universals that lie between the bodily and spirit- ual, the physical and psychical world." But it will be seen that of such physical activities we have little or no assured knowledge ; al- though we have the best of grounds for believing that such activities exist, and that they stand in important relations under law with the facts of the conscious psychical life. It follows, then, that Physiological Psychology is, pre-eminently, first experimental and then speculative ; it can never become strictly demonstrative, or even deductive to any considerable ex- tent. That a strictly demonstrative science of the relations be- tween the structure and functions of the nervous mechanism and the phenomena of consciousness is impossible, we might argue from the most ordinary experience. To infer from certain movements of material molecules that certain facts of consciousness must take place, under the most universal laws of all Being, involves a kind and amount of knowledge of which we cannot even clearly conceive. In brief, our proper course will be, first, to explain, as completely as possible, the structure and functions of the nervous mechanism ; and then to set forth, as fully as the present means at disposal will permit, the various relations in which its action under stimuli stand to the phenomena of the mind. In attempting the latter problem we shall come upon a few, but only a few, general state- ments of fact which deserve to be spoken of as laws in any strict meaning of the word. 1 Elements d. Psychophysik, pp. 8 and 10. Leipzig, 1860. INTRODUCTI01Sr.^H|UFC: -,/ 13 9. If the correctness of the remarks last made be admitted, the inquiry may be raised : What justification has this so-called sci- ence of Physiological Psychology for the large claims which it has made of late ; and, indeed, what right has it to exist as a special discipline at all? The full answer to the call for self-justification must be made by the actual achievements of the science itself. It will be better, then, to leave it to the convictions of the reader when the presentation of these achievements shall have been made. But even at this point an appeal may be taken to certain facts. We have already repeatedly conceded the fact that we are to investigate the phenomena of consciousness (that is, study psychology) by a special method rather than try to establish an independent science or even separate branch of the general science of mind. The de- mand for a justification is then reduced to this Is there valid reason for studying psychology in this particular way ; for approach- ing its domain through the researches and conclusions of physi- ology ? To such a question there can be but one intelligent answer. There is an abundance of valid reason. The history of modern investigation, and the conclusions of the modern science of man, both physical and psychological, emphasize the necessity of studying his nature and development as that of a living unity. Such science shows man to be at the head of a series of physical and psychical existences ; he cannot be understood as he is, in his whole nature and in his place within nature at large, without taking both sides of this living unity into account. For man is known to himself as body and mind and not as bodiless spirit or a mindless congeries of moving molecules. That the struct- ure and functions of the body, especially of the nervous mechan- ism, and the activities of the mind, are extensively and intimately correlated, is a fact beyond all doubt. It is the particular task of Physiological Psychology to show in what manner, and to what ex- tent, such correlation exists. Moreover, there are few questions more interesting, from a philosophical and an ethical point of view, than such as the following : What is the nature of mind, considered in the light of its correlations with the body ? and, Do the so-called physiological and the so-called psychical phenomena belong to one subject, or to more than one? But these and similar questions can be scientifically answered only by giving a speculative treat- ment to the conclusions of psycho-physical investigation. In brief, it may be said that introspective psychology, important as its results have been, and indispensable as its method is, has shown its incompetency to deal with many of the most interesting inquiries which it has itself raised. On the other hand, psychology 14 INTRODUCTION. as pursued by the experimental and physiological method has al- ready thrown a flood of fresh light upon many of these inquiries. We may affirm with "Wundt, ' without fear of successful contradic- tion : "Psychology is compelled to make use of objective changes in order, by means of the influences which they exert on our con- sciousness, to establish the subjective properties and laws of that consciousness." On this fact and on the real achievements of the method we confidently rest its claims to serious and permanent con- sideration. 1 Art. " Ueber psychopliysiken Metlioden," Pliilosophische Studien, 1881, heft 1, p. 4 PABT FIRST. THE NERVOUS MECHANISM CHAPTER I. THE ELEMENTS OF THE NEEVOUS SYSTEM. 1. IN all forms of animal life, except the very lowest, the pres- ence and activity of a nervous system constitutes the chief charac- teristic of their difference from all the more nearly corresponding forms of plant life. Both animals and plants are organisms, and their structure regarded as a whole composed of an indefinite number of material masses or particles, which move with reference to each other for the accomplishment of a common piece of work may be considered as a "natural mechanism." Both have mate- rial parts of superior firmness, adapted to divide off and to support their softer parts. Plants, as well as animals, are possessed of liv- ing, and, more especially, of contractile tissue ; they are therefore capable of the functions of nutrition, of propagation, and of that so-called automatic motion which is thought to be a fundamental property of protoplasm. As is well known, science is not yet able always to distinguish between the lowest forms of animal and the lowest forms of plant life. But nervous tissue and its functions do not belong to the vegetable kingdom ; on the contrary, the pos- session and use of at least a rudimentary mechanism of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells are found in most members of the animal kingdom. It is true that, even in the case of animals which do possess a nervous system, the structure and functions of the nervous tissue are very closely related to those of the merely contractile tissue. Thus the muscular tissue of the animal might seem to be a connect- ing-link between its own nervous tissue and the contractile tissue of the plant. For the motor nerves, at least, are anatomically con- nected by means of their end-plates with the contractile substance of the muscular fibre, and the result of modern experimentation, with both muscles and nerves, has been to make clear many feat- ures of resemblance between them. On the other hand, even the isolated nervous elements, when subjected to the same experi- mental tests as those which are used to determine the funda- mental properties of contractile tissue, exhibit certain marked differences of behavior ; while the functions of such elements, 2 18 FUNCTION OF A NERVOUS MECHANISM. when combined into a very simple nervous system, are alto- gether unique. Moreover, as the nervous system of the animal becomes more elaborate and complex, and especially as its central organs spinal cord and brain are relatively developed, other new and wonderful functions are seen to be connected with it. In the case of the superior vertebrate animals, and especially of man, the significance of this particular form of a physical mechanism be- comes, therefore, vastly increased. Thus the minute structure of the nervous mechanism invites the student of chemistry, molecular physics, and histology, to investigations of the greatest interest and yet of extreme difficulty ; while the functions of this mechanism are so curiously and intimately connected with the phenomena, not merely of all higher animal life, but also of human consciousness, that inquiry into them is, among all physical inquiries, the one of unparalleled intellectual interest and importance. 2. It will be the work of this entire treatise to set forth in some detail the unique functions of the human nervous mechanism, to which allusion has just been made. For the present a very gen- eral and somewhat indefinite statement of these functions must suf- fice. In general, and somewhat indefinitely, it may be said, then, that the one great function of the nervous system is to concatenate (or link together into a whole) the manifold elements, both physical and psycho-physical, which enter into the twofold life of man. Differ- ent and distant parts of the body, whether they belong to the same or to different so-called systems (as, for example, the circulatory, the secretory, the digestive, the muscular), are bound together, and made to exercise their functions in reciprocal dependence and for common ends, by the nervous mechanism. The whole body is also linked to the external world, and kept in either unconscious or con- scious adjustment to the changeful play of its forces, by the same mechanism. And further, the development of the mental life, at least in all its more primitive and fundamental factors, is mediated by the nervous system. For it is certainly in connection with the exercise of nervous functions that sensation takes place ; and, by development and combination of the sensations, all our perceptions of the so-called " Things " of the external world. It is the nervous mechanism which unites the entire body with the physical stimuli of the external world, on the one hand, and, on the other, with the primitive activities of mind. What relation the nervous functions have, and whether they have any direct relation at all, to memory, judgment, and the higher activities of mind in general, we do not now even inquire. The significance of the above-mentioned function of " concatena- EXAMPLES OF EEFLEX ACTION. 19 tion," so far as it concerns the different and distant parts of the body, might be illustrated in many ways. Inasmuch as the plant is an organism, there is a reciprocal dependence of the structure and action of all its parts. But each part of the plant acts directly and slowly on only contiguous parts in effecting the distribution of the fluids, upon the spread of which the life and growth of the plant depend. In the case of the animal, however, an effect pro- duced in one part of the body may quickly spread to other distant parts by the mediation of the nervous system. The circulation of the blood is made to affect, and to be affected by, the state of the skin and the muscles, the state of the respiratory organs, or the state of the mind's feeling as determined by the ideas before the mind. A draught of cold air, for example, strikes some peripheral portion of the body ; the heart and lungs modify their activities, the muscles contract, and a shudder runs through the physical framework ; the secretions are disturbed, and the mind is, perhaps, seized with a vague feeling of fear. Such a complex effect of the stimulus of cold on some region of the skin has been brought about by the action of the nervous system, with its peripheral end-organs, conducting nerve-fibres, and nervous centres. Or, again, the seeing of some sight or the hearing of some sound is followed by ideas and emotions of shame, or of fear, or of joy. A complex co-ordination of the muscles then takes place, so as to move the limbs in running, to give or ward off a blow, to extend the hand in greeting, to lift up or bow down the head. In this case, also, the action of heart and lungs and secretory organs is greatly modified ; the capillary circulation is altered, and the cheeks are blanched or reddened ; the pupils and lachrymal ducts of the eyes are moved ; the very hair of the head seems to sympathize with the state of the mind. Thus, changes which involve the functions of almost all the tissues and organs of the body are accomplished by the mediation of the nervous mechanism. Unlike the modifications in expression of function which take place in the plant, they are accomplished with what seems a practical instantaneousness. The complexity of the reciprocal changes which characterize the life of the higher animals is due to the general functions of the nervous system ; the speed with which the changes are accomplished is dependent upon the laws of the propagation of nervous impulses within that system. Further illustration of this general office of the mechanism of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells in " concatenating " the manifold ele- ments of physical and psycho-physical life may well be left to the progress of our examination. 3. The application of the term " mechanism " to the nervous sys- 20 FUNCTION OF A NEEVOUS MECHANISM. tern of man has already (see p. 4 ff.) been partially explained and justified. We now describe the elementary parts of such a system as considered from the same general point of view which induces us to apply this term to the structure and functions of the entire system. In order to do this, it is necessary to speak, first, of the structure, and, second, of the function of these parts, regarded as the fundamental and distinguishing factors of a complex mechanism. That is to say, two inquiries must be made : What is the composi- tion and form of those ultimate structures called nervous elements, into which microscopic anatomy analyzes the nervous system ? and, What can such structures do which fits them to act as parts of a " mechanism " like that of the nervous system ? It is obvious that the answers to these inquiries lie at the very entrance upon the way toward a complete science of the nervous mechanism. But even if the fullest imaginable answers were already attained, much would remain to be done in order to perfect the science. Histology would still have to inform us precisely how the elements are com- bined into the manifold organs of a system. Physiology would have to discover the laws according to which the functions of the elements are modified, when they act as thus combined. Of course, to know completely the nature, number, and properties of all the individual factors of a mechanical system, and to know also pre- cisely how those factors are combined into the system, as well as how their modes of behavior are affected by such a combination, would be to have a complete science of such system. A strictly deductive science of the molecular motion, and con- sequent function of the elements of the nervous mechanism, is, in- deed, a conceivable attainment. But it need scarcely be said that we are indefinitely far from, not only the attainment, but even the reasonable prospect of such a complete physical science of the ner- vous system. None of the questions raised respecting the struct- ure and functions of its elements, whether considered apart or in combination, can be answered with complete satisfaction. More- over, the scientific study and description of the nervous mechanism is compelled from the first to pursue a somewhat different path from that open to many forms of physical science. The direct path to the complete science of the subject is impassable ; it is ren- dered impassable by the most fundamental and universal of our experiences respecting the nature of the phenomena of the nervous system. The immediate effects of the molecular changes which take place in the nervous elements, even when isolated as much as possible, can only with difficulty be made the subject of direct obser- vation. Histology has enormous difficulties to overcome in its effort STUDY OF NEKVOUS ELEMENTS. 21 to describe how these elements are combined in the living human body, and physiology has like difficulties in the way of its effort to determine the functions of those organs which are constructed by means of such combination. Only the beginning of a theory which shall correlate that mode of molecular motion which is peculiar to nervous matter with other modes of the motion of matter has yet been made. In spite of the foregoing concessions, a careful study of the ele- ments of the nervous system is the indispensable mode of approach to the subject of physiological psychology. It is these elements which, when variously combined, constitute all the organs of the system ; it is they which, when acting in combination, do all the w r ork of the system. 4. The Elements of the Nervous System of Man, as elements, do not differ in any essential known respect from those of other verte- brate animals. Upon this subject, then, histology with its micro- scope, and physiology with its experimentation, can describe the nerve-fibres and nerve-cells of other animals, and then safely draw certain inferences from them which will apply to the case of man. It is, however, the development of enlarged or of new organs by the combination of these elements, and the development and elab- oration of function as dependent upon such organs, which consti- tute the difference between the nervous system of man and that of the lower animals. It is here that histology meets with its supreme difficulties and its most interesting problems ; it is here that plrysi- ology is most insecure when trying to carry over to the structure and functions of the human nervous mechanism the conclusions which have been reached by experiments upon the lower animals. On the contrary, the nerve-fibres and nerve-cells of these animals are, in most respects, perfectly competent to tell us all we need to know regarding the nerve-fibres and nerve-cells of man. In describing the constitution, structure, and function of the nervous elements, therefore, it will not generally be necessary to pay attention to the specific animal form from which the description is taken. In other words, the discussion of the nervous elements belongs to the most general histology and physiology of the nervous system. 5. The elements of the nervous mechanism require to be con- sidered in three ways : (1) as respects their chemical constitution ; (2) as respects their formal structure ; (3) as respects their general physiological function. 6. The Chemistry of the Nervous System is of necessity in an exceedingly unsatisfactory condition. The facts concerning which perfect certainty is attainable are very few in number ; the bearing 22 CHEMISTRY OF NERVOUS ELEMENTS. of those facts on our theory of nerve-function is both slight and disputable. Physiological chemistry is in general encompassed with many difficulties. These difficulties are not due simply to the complex constitution of most of the substances with which it has to deal. They are also very largely due to the fact that these sub- stances are products of life ; and living tissue cannot be at the same time kept in normal condition and subjected to the handling- necessary for chemical analysis. As soon as it is no longer alive, or at any rate long before any chemical analysis can be completed, the constitution of such tissue is changed. However carefully the chemical elements, the constituents, which enter into the ner- vous substance may be preserved, their constitution, their chemical arrangement and behavior, cannot be preserved. It is impossible for example for the chemist even to determine the specific gravity of uncoagulated blood, " except by operating with extreme expedition and at temperatures below C." Moreover, the difficulties which belong to the chemistry of all living tissue are especially great in the case of the nervous tissues. In their natural state the proximate principles which compose these tissues are very complex and unstable compounds. To obtain spe- cific portions or kinds of nervous substance free from foreign ingre- dients as, for example, the axis-cylinder of the nerves, or the rods and cones of the retina is by no means always easy. The analysis of such substance, when once the substance is obtained, is often ex- tremely tedious in respect to process, and doubtful in respect to result. Nevertheless, the principal conclusions, which may be ac- cepted with considerable confidence in their correctness, are as follows : 7. Nervous Matter is of two kinds, called white or fibrous, and gray or vesicular, which differ not only in color and microscopic structure, but also in specific gravity and chemical constitution. The specific gravity of the white nervous matter is greater than that of the gray. Danilewski l found the specific gravity of the gray matter in man to vary from 1.02927 to 1.03854 ; that of the white matter from 1.03902 to 1.04334. Others (as Bastian, W. Krause, and L. Fischer) calculate the mean specific gravity of the gray mat- ter at about 1.031, of the white at 1.036-1.040. "This difference in the weight of the two is chiefly due to the difference in the relative amount of water and of solids which they contain. Of 100 parts of each, from the brain of the ox, the gray matter was found to be 1 See Med. Centralbl., xviii., p. 241, as cited by Drechsel, with apparent confidence, in Hermann's Handbuch der Physiologie, V., i., p. 577. Leipzig, 1883. NON-PHOSPHORIZED BODIES IN BRAIN. composed of 81.60 parts of water and 18.40 of solids ; the white, of 68.35 of water and 31.65 of solids. The amount of water is also larger in the brain of the young animal than in that of the adult. The brain of the foetus was found by Weisbach to consist of from 87.9 to 92.6 parts of water. The amount of water entering into the composition of the different parts of the central nervous system is unequal. The following is a tabulated statement 1 of the facts to which allusion has just been made : PROPORTION OF WATER IN ONE HUNDRED PARTS. Age, 20 to SO. Age, 30 to 50. Age, 70 to 94. White substance of the brain 69 56 68 31 72.61 Gray substance of the brain . . . 83 36 83.60 84.78 Cerebellum 78.83 77.87 80.34 73 46 72.55 72 74 74.43 73.25 73.62 The amount of water varies in the different regions of the spinal cord. Bernhardt found a smaller proportion of water in the cervi- cal (73.05 per cent.) than in the lumbar (76.04) region of the cord. The gray matter also contains more of albumen, lecithin, and lactic acid than the white, and less of cholesterin, fat, and protagon. 8. Of the solids contained in the matter of the nerve-centres, more than one-half in the gray, and about one-quarter in the white, consist of certain proteid or albuminous substances. Bodies of this general class are the only ones never absent from the active living cells ; they therefore exist in the primordial structures of all vegetable and animal organisms, and occupy a peculiar place among organic proximate principles. Of these proteid substances found in the nerve-centres very little is as yet known. Gamgee a mentions three such substances one soluble in water and probably derived from the gray matter, another a globulin-like body which is dissolved by a ten per cent, solution of common salt, still another a myosin-like body which remains in solution when a ten per cent, salt solution of brain is boiled. 9. Three other non-phosphorized bodies of different classes from that above mentioned are found in nervous tissues : these are Cholesterin, Neurokeratin, and, more doubtfully, Cerebrin. Cho- 1 Derived from Weisbach's observations, and found in Gamgee, Physiologi- cal Chemistry of the Animal Body, i. , p. 445. London, 1880. 2 Physiological Chemistry, i., p. 423 ; see, also, the article of D. Petrowsky, " Zusammensetzung der grauen und der weissen Substanz des Gehirns," Pflii- ger's Archiv, vii., p. 367. 24 CHEMISTEY OF NERVOUS ELEMENTS. lesterin is among the most abundant of the constituents of the ner- vous tissues especially of the white matter of the cerebro-spinal axis and of the nerves. It is a "monad alcohol," the only alcohol which occurs in the human body in a free state. On account of its solubility in ether, cold or hot, and in warm alcohol, cholesterin finds its way into both ethereal and alcoholic extracts of the ner- vous tissues. It is a non-nitrogenous body, crystallizing in beau- tiful white crystals, which, when separated pure from its solutions in ether or chloroform, takes the shape of fine needles, and when separated from alcohol takes the shape of rhombic tables. It is sup- posed to exist preformed in the brain. Its formula is C 26 H 44 O + H a O- Neurokeratin is most easily derived by treating the medullated nerve-fibres with boiling alcohol and ether, so as to extract the fatty matters of the medullary sheath ; in the place of this sheath there is left, as a kind of irregular framework, a highly refractile sub- stance which resembles the horny matter of epidermis in its power of resistance to chemical agents. This substance is also found in the gray matter of the nerve-centres, and in the retinal epithelial cells and pigment cells of the choroid ; but not in the non-medul- lated nerve-fibres. It contains nitrogen, 2.93 per cent, of sulphur, and leaves 1.6 per cent, of ash. Cerebrin was announced by Miiller, in 1858, as a non-phosphorized nitrogenous body, obtained from a precipitate from the brain when pounded up with baryta water to the consistence of thin milk and then boiled. He described it as a loose, white, very light powder, destitute of smell and taste, soluble in boiling alcohol and ether, but insoluble in water. He gave to it the formula C 34 H 33 NO 6 . Thudi- chum believes that brain matter contains a class of nitrogenous bod- ies free from phosphorus, to which he gives the name of "cerebrins." Gamgee, however, thinks it very unlikely that a body produced, like Miiller's cerebrin, "by the prolonged action of a solution of boiling barium hydrate on so complex an organic mixture as brain should be a definite proximate principle of the unaltered organ ;" j but the same authority admits 2 that the precipitate which sepa- rates itself from an alcoholic solution of brain contains, besides cholesterin, protagon, and the so-called lecithins, "a body for which we may retain the name of cerebrin." Nuclein was discovered by Miescher in the nuclei of pus-corpus- cles and in the yellow corpuscles of yolk of egg. Other observers subsequently obtained it from various other substances, especially from the nuclei of the red blood-corpuscles of birds and amphibia. 1 Physiological Chemistry, i., p. "439. 'Ibid., i.,p. 433. PHOSPHORIZED BODIES IN BRAIN. 25 Von Jaksch l thinks he has discovered miclein in the human brain. His claim seems to be credited by Drechsel. 2 Its formula is given as C 29 H 49 N 9 P 3 O 22 . But the very existence of nuclein, as a definite body, has been denied by chemists like Worm-M filler and Gam- gee ; and the analyses of Von Jaksch do not agree with those ob- tained from other sources than the substance of the human brain. The whole question of nuclein must then be left in doubt. 10. No other substances found in the nervous system are, how- ever, both so interesting and so difficult to consider, from the mixed chemical and psycho-physical point of view, as certain complex phos- phorized fats. The entire progress of our inquiry will make it obvi- ous how inadequate and misleading is the use often made of such off-hand remarks as the celebrated dictum : " No thought without phosphorus." Yet it is doubtless true that the highly elaborate and unstable compounds containing phosphorus, which enter into the composition of nervous matter, have a significance for physiological and psychological researches such as belongs to no other material bodies. These complex bodies are especially characteristic of the centres of the nervous system. The strife of discovery and of con- firmatory experiment has been chiefly carried on over the following three : Protagon, Lecithin, and Cerebrin. Of these three, however, probably only the two former are phosphorized bodies. The main question involved in controversy concerns the relation in which leci- thin and cerebrin stand to protagon. Is protagon a definite prox- imate principle of the brain, and are lecithin and cerebrin bodies of ill-defined properties and doubtful claim to existence as proximate principles of the brain ? or, are lecithin and cerebrin definite prox- imate principles, and is protagon a mechanical admixture of the two ? The latter view of protagon has been held by Diaconow, Hoppe-Seyler, and Thudichum ; on the contrary, its claims to the position of the " only well-characterized phosphorized proximate principle " of the brain as yet discovered have been defended (and, it may be said, apparently established) by the researches of Gam- gee and others. Protagon was discovered, as a new proximate principle that can be separated from the brain, in 1864, by Dr. Oscar Liebreich ; his discovery was announced in a paper 3 published in 1865. This in- vestigator gave to this substance the name which it still bears, as 1 See article " Ueber das Vorkommen von Nuclein im Menschengehirn," Pfliiger's Archiv, xiii., p. 469. 2 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., V., i., p. 578. 3 "Ueber die chemische Beschaffenheit der Gehirnsubstanz." Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie, cxxxiv., pp. 29-44. 26 CHEMISTEY OF NERVOUS ELEMENTS. in his opinion the first to be definitely ascertained among the spe- cific constituents of the brain (Trpwrayos, leading the van). He as- signed to it the formula C U6 H 241 N 4 O 22 P. In spite of subsequent denials and disproofs of its existence, the extremely careful and often-repeated researches of Gamgee l and Blankenhorn have cor- roborated the discovery of Liebreich. The process by which pro- tagon is obtained from the brain may be thus briefly described (the description will serve to illustrate in general the processes of physi- ological chemistry) : Perfectly fresh ox's brains are freed from the blood and membranes, and are then digested for about a day in eighty-five per cent, alcohol ; from this fluid, when filtered, a quan- tity of white flocculent precipitate is obtained, and the cholesterin and other bodies soluble in ether are dissolved out ; from the sub- stance left undissolved, when dried and reduced to powder and digested for many hours with alcohol, and then filtered and cooled, microscopic crystals separate themselves, arranged for the most part in rosettes. The substance thus crystallized is protagon. It is con- sidered by some chemists the easiest to obtain, and indeed the only very well-established phosphorized proximate principle of the brain. Such a material substance is indeed a long way removed from the living nervous mass, with its capacity for exercising such marvel- lous physiological and psycho-physical functions. But it is the best representative that chemistry can as yet present of a scientific result upon which to base any attempt to point out definite relations be- tween psychical activities and the chemical constitution of those complex phosphorized fats which exist in the central nervous mechanism. The empirical formula of protagon, as given by Gam- gee, is C 160 H 30S N & PO 35 . It has been made highly probable that pro- tagon cannot be a compound or mixture of cerebrin and lecithin ; it may, then, be announced as a proximate principle of the brain. Lecithin is an organic phosphorized compound which exists in large quantities in ova, spermatozoa, etc., as well as in the nervous tissues. It is described as a yellowish-white, w r axy, very hygro- scopic solid, which in thin layers shines with a silky lustre. It is soluble in ether and alcohol ; on being stirred with water it forms a starch-like solution difficult to filter. Diaconow assigns to it the for- mula C 44 H 90 NPO 9 H-H 2 O. Gamgee supposes that the lecithin of Dia- conow is only one of a group of similar bodies which possess a higher percentage of phosphorus than protagon, and the "general smeary characters " of lecithin. We may, then, speak of " the lecithins " as highly phosphorized compounds existing in the matter of the brain. 1 See his Physiological Chemistry, i., pp. 425-429 ; and article in the Jour- nal of Physiology, ii., pp. 113-131. INORGANIC BODIES IN BRAIN. 27 The various products of the decomposition of protagon and leci- thin it is not necessary to describe. Neurin is the only one of these products which deserves for our purpose even to be named. It may be obtained from either protagon or lecithin. Dr. Thudi- chum's elaborate "Researches on the Chemical Constitution of the Brain " 1 conclude that at least three well-defined groups of phos- phorized bodies may be separated from the brain ; these are dis- tinguished as (1) kephalins, (2) myelins, (3) lecithins. The exist- ence of a group of bodies which may be termed " lecithins " has just above been declared probable. Thudichum thinks that all these bodies contain phosphoric acid combined proximately with glyce- rin, but " differ in the manner in which they contain the nitrogen and the acid radicles which constitute the great bulk of their sub- stance." The researches of Dr. Thudichum still await confirmation. 11. In addition to the substances already mentioned, the brain contains certain extractive matters which are found also in other tissues, especially in muscle. Among these bodies are creatin, inosite, xanthin, and lactic acids. 12. The brain also contains an extremely small amount of inor- ganic matters so small, indeed, that few facts can be relied on concerning it. The estimates of this amount vary from 0.1 to 1 per cent, of the fresh brain. Among such inorganic matters are alkaline phosphates and sulphates, chalk, magnesia, oxide of iron, etc. It is said that the ash of the gray matter has an alkaline reac- tion, that of the white matter an acid reaction, 2 and that the reac- tion of the former during life is acid, while that of the latter is neutral or weak alkaline. 13. All quantitative analyses of the brain are exceedingly doubt- ful ; the older results are wholly worthless. The following table of Petrowsky, 3 which gives the chief organic constituents of the brain of the ox, is an object of interest rather than of complete confidence : Substance. Gray Matter. White Matter. Albumen and gelatin 55.37+ per 0.53+ 17.24+ 18.68 + 6.71 + 1.45 + cent. 24. 72+ per 9.55- 9.90+ 51.91- 3.34+ 0.57+ cent. Cerebrin Lecithin Cholesterin and fats Salts 1 Reports of Medical Officer of the Privy Council and Local Government Board, 1874, pp. 113 ff. 3 See Gamgee, Physiological Chemistry, i., p. 445; Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., V., i., p. 577. 3 u Zusammensetzung der grauen und der weissen Substanz des Gehirns," Pfliiger's Archiv, vii., p. 367. 28 CHEMISTRY OF NERVOUS ELEMENTS. 14. The specific chemistry of the elements of the nervous sys- tem, or of the various parts of such elements which histological science reveals, is yet more meagre and doubtful than its general chemistry. The micro-chemistry of the nerve-cells tells us simply that they are in the main protoplasmic, and therefore rich in pro- *teid substances ; and since an analysis of the two kinds of nervous matter shows that the gray is much the poorer in complex phos- phorized constituents and in cholesterin, we conclude that the cells which enter so largely into the gray matter are also poor in the same substances. The different structural parts of the nerve-fibres have doubtless a different chemical constitution. This is proved by the difference in their appearance under the microscope, by the different action of reagents upon them, and, to some extent, by chemical analysis. The neurilemrna, or membranous envelope of the nerve-fibres, like the sarcolemma, on prolonged boiling, yields gelatin. The axis-cylinder appears to be a mixture of proteid with complex fat-like bodies. The w r hite substance of Schwann is rich in complex phosphorized fats, in cholesterin, and in the so-called cerebrins. The researches of Ktihne l and others for the most part his pupils have developed certain interesting results with respect to the chemical constitution and chemical^ changesof the nervous tis- sue of the eye. Many of the various non-nervous parts of the ear and the eye have been carefully analyzed. The extremely small amount of such material which is obtainable for chemical analysis is one reason why so little can be known concerning the chemical constitution of the substance of the retina. It is said to have an acid reaction. It is a fair surmise, on general grounds, that it con- tains the same bodies as the central nervous system. The two seg- ments into which the rods and cones break up exhibit marked dif- ferences in their chemical as well as optical characters. The inner segments are composed of protoplasm of "a marvellous transpar- ency." The outer limbs of the rods have an external envelope which agrees in its physical characters with neurokeratin. This envelope encloses a mixture of proteid bodies and of other sub- stances similar to those found in the other nervous tissues. 15. If knowledge of the chemical constitution of the nervous system is so far behind what we could wish, knowledge of the chemical processes and chemical changes which are connected with the physiological functions of this system must be declared to be 1 For a list of papers by Kuhne and his pupils on this subject, see Gamgee, Physiological Chemistry, i., p. 462 1; and for an account by him of his re- searches and their results, see Hermann, Handb. d. PhysioL, L, L, pp. 235 ff. IXTRA-MOLECULAE OXTG1 20 almost wholly wanting. Even the beginnings of scientific general statements, or fates, respecting the relations between the chemical constitution of the nervous system and its various physiological activities have yet to be made. Different investigators will doubt- less differ as to the prospect for such discovery in the future. When chemistry can deduce the molecular behavior of the most highly complex chemical compound from the nature and number of its component chemical elements, and physiology can definitely connect all the physiological functions of nervous matter with the molecular motions of its chemical constituents, we shall have the means for a strictly scientific solution of such problems. 16. It need scarcely be said that we have little knowledge re- specting the relation which exists between the chemical constitu- tion and chemical processes of the nervous system, on the one hand, and, on the other, the phenomena of so-called mind. Nevertheless, certain important general relations may be point- ed out between the chemical nature of the nervous mechanism and its psycho-physical functions. The extremely high organiza- tion and chemically sensitive constitution of this mechanism are beyond doubt related to all its distinctive f unctions, lake every other natural material structure, the nervous system is obviously adapted to its peculiar kind of work. Chemically considered, it appears as composed of a number of extremely complex and highly unstable compounds. It therefore holds in its chemical consti- tution a large amount of disposable energy ; this energy it yields readily when the equilibrium of its molecules is in any way dis- turbed. Within certain limits, it explodes with increasing surren- der of its disposable energy as the number and intensity of the demands upon it are increased very much as would a gun which should be arranged so as to go off with greater energy as the press- ure of the finger on its trigger is repeated or increased. It is probable that the substance of the nerves is the seat of a chemical synthesis, as the result of which still more complex bodies are constructed from the already complex alimentary material fur- nished by the blood ; such bodies have a high value as combus- tibles, and thus, as has been said, possess a significant amount of disposable energy. The relation of a supply of oxygen to the nerve-centres is also important to notice. The nerve-fibres require comparatively a small amount of oxygen. It may be conjectured that in their case, as in the case of muscle-fibre, intra-molecular oxygen is of some use in preparing explosive materials. But at present we must be satisfied with conjecture on this point On the contrary, the vascular nature of the central organs creates a pre- 30 FOKM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. sumption that the chemical processes which have their seat in them require an abundance of oxygen. Experience confirms this pre- sumption. The respiratory centre in the medulla oblongata is chiefly controlled in its action by the amount of oxygen which reaches it in the blood. The phenomena of consciousness vanish when the supply of oxygenated blood is cut off from the brain. Although we are still in the dark as to the precise significance of the visual purple, the phenomena which the study of it has brought to light are suggestive of unseen chemical processes that are set up in the retina, and so serve as stimulus for the fibrils of the optic nerve. In general we know that certain sensations are dependent upon the chemical constitution and activity of the various end- organs of sense. Further researches will undoubtedly greatly enlarge our knowl- edge of those facts of relation which exist between the chemical constitution and changes of the nervous mechanism and the phe- nomena of psychical life. Perhaps such particular statements of fact may be gathered into such more general statements of fact, verifiable by experiment, as we consider sufficient to constitute scientifically established laws. But why certain chemical constitu- ents, when combined and changed in definite fashion, should be specifically connected with certain conscious experiences will always remain an unanswerable inquiry. 17. From the chemical constitution of the elements of the ner- vous system we now pass to their Structural Form. The science which must be our guide is no longer chemistry, but microscopic anatomy, or histology; this science furnishes us with a large amount of trustworthy information mingled with a still larger amount of conjecture and doubt. Even the number of those elements upon which histology is entitled to focus its microscope and declare that such, and no others, are capable of performing distinctively ner- vous functions can scarcely be said, as yet, to be placed beyond all doubt ; neither can it be claimed that the microscope has yet dem- onstrated the ultimate structure of those two species of such ele- ments the reality of whose nervous functions is beyond doubt. It is customary to speak of nerve-fibres and ganglion-cells as the only structural elements of the nervous system. If, however, by the term " ganglion -cell " we intend only such bodies as histology usu- ally describes under this type (for example, the so-called motor ganglion-cells of the spinal cord) the limitation is without sufficient warrant. For there are many cells, which almost certainly have some significance as parts of the nervous system, that differ in form very widely from the typical ganglion-cell. Moreover, by such CORPUSCLES OF DOUBTFUL CHARACTER. 31 an off-hand twofold division the important question is often silently passed by : What is the significance for the nervous functions of that diffuse, finely granular substance, found in considerable quantity in the great nerve-centres, and called neuroglia, or nerve-cement (Ner- ven-kitt ; Kittsubstanz) ? This substance is most frequently classed with the connective tissue; but, according to Henle, 1 "it is at all events to be distinguished from connective tissue on account of its chemical properties." That certain microscopic forms of so-called "neuroglia" are largely unlike other forms recognized as being nerve-cells beyond doubt cannot be argued in proof of its ina- bility to perform any of the strictly nervous functions, except upon the basis of the assumption that we already know beyond reasonable question what are all the elementary structural forms of true ner- vous matter. But, as says Eckhard, 2 " if we start the inquiry, what formal elements of the brain and spinal cord take part in the activi- ties of these (the nervous) organs, and in what way do they take part, we are able to give to it only a very unsatisfactory answer." We are not in a position, then, either to affirm or to deny abso- lutely the claim sometimes set up for the neuroglia, that it con- tains true nervous elements. It is best to recur to the facts which microscopic anatomy dis- closes as a basis for classifying the different structural elements of the nervous system. These may be briefly described as follows : * As to the true nervous character of fibres of various kinds, not only a$ conducting bands between the nervous centres and the peripheral parts of the body, but also within the substance of these centres, there is no dispute. Nerve-fibres undoubtedly constitute one of the structural elements of the nervous mechanism. Besides the nerve-fibres, histology distinguishes in the gray substance of the nervous centres where all the structural elements of the nervous system are to be found in greatest abundance and variety three other species of structural form. Such are (a) certain cells, known more particularly as the " ganglionic nerve-cells." These cells (to be described more minutely hereafter) are irregular masses of finely granular protoplasm, possessed of a clear nucleus and one or more nucleoli, and sending off one or more processes. (b) Corpuscles, consisting either of naked nuclei or of nuclei with only a small amount of surrounding protoplasm, and having various shapes sometimes difficult to make out, are also found abundantly in the gray matter of certain nervous centres. Such 1 Anatomie des Menschen. Text, p. 306. Braunschweig, 1880. 2 Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol , II., ii., p. 15. 3 Comp. Henle, Anatomic des Meuschen. Text, p. 306. 32 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. bodies are usually much smaller than the cells of undoubted ner- vous character described above, many of them being scarcely more than -g-gL-^ - -joVo, or even -5-5^0 f an i ncu * n diameter. Some of them, like the typical ganglionic cell, give off processes which are thought to be continuous with nerve-fibres. It is altogether prob- able that these cells of the second class differ only in their dimen- sions from the cells of the first class. In some places (for example, in the cortex of the cerebrum, or large brain) they appear to have the characteristics of transitional forms between the undeveloped granules of the same class and the more highly developed ganglion- cells. In other places (as in the cerebellum) they form independ- ent layers. They may be described as nuclei "invested by only a small quantity of cell-substance." 1 Some are multipolar, some bipolar, some unipolar. Admitting, as we seem compelled to do on account of their resemblance to the typical form of the ganglionic nerve-cell, that some of these cells are true nervous elements, it is impossible for histology to draw the line through the entire class, and so to affirm beyond doubt that any of them are without claim to be counted among such elements. (c) The diffuse, finely granular substance, already referred to as so-called "neuroglia," which fills in the gaps between the nerve- fibres and the cells of the two preceding classes, constitutes the other form of matter observed in the nervous" centres. It exists in quan- tity large enough to form an essential constituent of some locali- ties of the brain and spinal cord. It is not always clear, however, to what this appearance of granular or molecular matter, in which the nerve-cells seem embedded, is due. According to some author- ities, it may result from a confused interlacement of fine nerve- fibrils and fine ramifications of nerve-cells ; or from the crushing of such nervous matter in the process of examination. 2 The neu- roglia itself is described as a delicate reticulum, or network, in which certain small cells (neuroglia-cells) supposed to belong to the sustentacular tissue, and other more conspicuous cells, usually stellate in section (" cells of Deiters "), are found. 18. Of the three foregoing kinds of structural forms found in the gray nervous matter, it is perhaps safest to class the first two together under the term "nerve-cells." We should then have to remember how greatly these vary in size and formation all the way from the naked, or almost naked, nucleus to the large ganglion- cell with its many processes and complex microscopic structure. 1 See Max Schultze in Strieker, Human and Comparative Histology, i., p. 183. London, 1870. 8 See Quain's Elements of Anatomy, ii., p. 149. London, 1882. STRUCTURE OF A NERVE. 33 The last of the three (neuroglia) may then be regarded as a susten- tacular tissue ; though with the confession that in the brain and spinal cord it is by no means always easy to distinguish susten- tacular from true nervous tissue. 1 Of the structures known as nerve-fibres and nerve-cells, his- tology enables us to give a further more minute, if not a com- plete, description ; it also excites our interest by making it possi- ble to conjecture what is the regular anatomical relation between the two. When combined with physiological researches, histology also enables us to make considerable progress toward distinguish- ing the separate as well as the combined functions of these ele- ments. We consider, then, with particular detail, the structure and functions of nerve-fibres and ganglionic nerve-cells. 19. What is ordinarily called a nerve appears to the naked eye, when dissected from an animal, as a cord of a whitish or grayish ep pn> FIG. 1. Cross-section of the Sciatic Nerve of Man. 8 /j. (After Key and Retzius.) The left lower half is schematic, ra, n, Bundles of nerve-fibres, surrounded by pn, pn, the perineurium ; be- tween them appears the connective tissue, epineurium (ep, ep), and adipose substance (ad). color, and of uniform structure. The nerve is really, however, one or more bundles, or fascicles, of a larger or smaller size, bound to- gether by connective tissue. Accordingly, on following it toward its peripheral termination we find that it divides and subdivides until its subdivisions consist of a single nervous element called a 1 Comp. Ranvier, Traite Technique d'Histologie, i., p. 717. 3 Paris, 1875. 34 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. Nerve-fibre. The bundles have a special sheath formed of con- nective tissue (neurilemma, or perineurium), which in the finest branches becomes reduced to a single layer of cells cemented to- gether edge to edge, and is called the "sheath of Henle." On fol- lowing the fibres backward again toward the central organs, it is found that several of them are bound together to form a nerve- fascicle ; a small amount of fibrillar connective tissue appears be- tween the several fibres within the same sheath ; the character of the sheath itself is changed, and it becomes attached to surround- ing structures by a layer of connective tissue. It is the fibres into which the nerves break up on being followed toward their periph- eral terminations, or by junction of which, successively, they are composed on being followed toward their central termination, that are to be considered as the true elements of the nervous system. 20. Such nerve-fibres as compose the nerves which stretch from the central organs to the peripheral parts of vertebrate animals may readily be divided into two classes : one called medullated fibres or nerve-tubes, and the other non-medullated fibres or fibres of Eeinak. Nerves in which there is a large proportion of medul- lated fibres have a characteristic white or watery appearance ; those in which only non-medullated fibres, or only a few medullated fibres, exist are grayish and slightly translucent. Vertebrates alone have the former. The medullated nerve-tubes belong particularly to the cerebro-spinal system, and are, therefore, of prime interest in psycho-physical researches ; the fibres of Remak are very abundant in all the nerves belonging to the sympathetic system. This two- fold division of nerve-fibres, while admitting of easy application to the constituent elements of the nerve-trunks, becomes more diffi- cult when we attempt to carry it out within the complex nervous matter of the central organs. Here Max Schultze 1 points out sev- eral varieties of nerve-fibres. There are, first, those "very fine threads which lie on the extreme verge of microscopic mensura- tion," and which require an enlargement of from 500 to 800 diame- ters in order to be made visible. In such fibres no internal struct- ure can be detected by the microscope. To these Schultze gives the name of " primitive nerve-fibrils." Second : certain very deli- cate transparent fibres of albuminous composition, and distinguished from the foregoing by their greater size and their manifest fibrillar structure, are found in the central organs. These are the so-called naked axis-cylinders. Both the foregoing, when invested with a medullary sheath, become converted into the third, or medullated, form of nerve-fibre. These fibres in the nerves, while running be- 1 See Strieker's Human and Comparative Histology, i. , pp. , 147 ff. VARIETIES OF NERVE-FIBRES. 35 tween the central organs and the end-organs, become invested with a delicate membrane, and are thus converted into nerve-tubes of the well-known threefold structure. A fourth form of nerve-fibre occurs in the peripheral nerves, and is distinguished from the fore- going by the absence of the medullary sheath. This is the pe- ripheral non-medullated fibre, or fibre of Remak, already alluded to. As they appear to the microscopist, then, on an examination of all the kinds of nerve-fibres which are found in all the different parts of the nervous system, the following table of varieties is proposed by Schultze : T XT -i n i. j ( 1- Primitive fibrils. I Non-medullated I ft . v , .... _., fi , -< 2. fasciculi of primitive fibrils. ( 3. These last, with a sheath of Schwann. !1. Primitive fibrils with medullary sheath. 2. Fasciculi of primitive fibrils with such , ,, " sheath. 3. These last, with a sheath of Schwann. The exposition of Schultze, although of value in setting forth the variety of forms in which the nerve-fibre is actually found by the histologist, does not constitute an objection to the twofold di- vision first proposed. On the contrary, it leads directly to such a division. For it will be noticed that both of the chief classes of fibres are regarded as composed of a number of primitive fibrils ; both are also regarded as becoming invested in their peripheral course with an outside membrane. The two classes, however, are really derived upon the basis of the fact that some of the primitive fibrils, whether they have already become invested with this mem- brane or not, possess a medullary sheath, and others do not. It is the presence or absence of this medullary sheath which constitutes the one important difference between the different classes of nerve- fibres. 21. Medullated nerve-fibres, or nerve -tubes, have a threefold structure. Such fibres, when separated by teasing with needles from the fascicle of nerve-fibres and examined under the microscope while still fresh, appear pellucid, with a central part and a border on each side, like a translucent liquid in a tube of translucent walls. The lines of this double contour are at first comparatively sharp and regular ; lengthening the focus of the instrument ob- scures slightly the central part, and causes the parts on the border to appear brighter. Little by little the appearance of the fibres changes. The contours become irregular, and the substance (myelin) 36 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. composing the borders becomes folded, striated, and granulated in appearance. The myelin wells over the sides of the ends of the fibres in irregular globular or contorted masses. Occasionally a pale filament may be seen projecting beyond the torn end of a fibre. Owing to the fact that various solutions have different effects upon the different parts of the nerve-fibres, it is possible to prepare specimens which shall exhibit clearly their threefold structure. Thus, for ex- ample, a solution of picrocarminate of ammonia colors the central part of the fibre, or axis-cylin- der, but not the myelin ; whereas osmic acid stains the axis-cylinder slightly, the myelin thor- oughly, but not the substance of the annular rings. By use, then, of various reagents, to color the nerve-fibres, and by numerous observations of them under various circumstances, their three- fold nature in a living state is thought to be dem- onstrated. We distinguish, then, in the medul- lated fibres : (1) An outer membrane, extremely thin, pellucid, with nuclei in it, and called the primitive sheath or sheath of Schwann ; (2) an in- terior layer of dimly granular, white, and highly FIG. 2. Meduiiated refracting substance, semi-liquid during life, and Nerve-fibres, with doub- . -, ,, -, . -. i- le and irregular contour atter death undergoing a process resembling co- euowing. (schwaibe.) agu i at i on _ ca n e a the medullary sheath or white substance of Schwann ; and (3) a cylindrical band of albuminous material, transparent, but with marks of fibrillation called the axis-cylinder. Only the last is supposed to constitute the essen- tial nervous structure ; for, as we have already seen, many nerve- fibres are simple naked axis-cylinders, and all fibres for a certain distance from the cells in which they originate are devoid of the medullary sheath. There is considerable evidence that the presence of this sheath depends upon the need of insulation only. 22. Besides the threefold longitudinal structure of the meclul- lated nerve-fibre, we have to notice certain structural modifications that occur at intervals in its length. The peripheral nerve-tube does not run along as a regular cylinder, but places of constriction appear at certain points situated beneath the outer sheath ; these constrictions are made at the expense of the medullary sheath or myelin. They are called annular constrictions or nodes of Eanvier ; the portion of nerve-fibre included between two of these constric- tions is called an interannular segment. At the constrictions the ends of the segments of the outer sheath are joined together by a MEDULLATED NERVE-FIBKES. A B 37 FlG. 3. A, Medullated Nerve-fibres from the Sciatic of a Rabbit, stained with osmic acid, and dissociated in water. (Ranvier.) B, Single Fibre Enlarged 40 % , a, a, An- nular constrictions, or nodes of Ranvier, nearly midway between which is n, the nu- cleus, with protoplasm, p, surrounding it ; ca, axis-cylinder. "P 71 FlG. 4. Medullated Nerve-fibres. (Schwalbe.) a, Axis-cylinder ; *, sheath of Schwann ; n, nucleus ; p, p, granular substance at the poles of the nucleus ; r, r, Ranvier's nodes, where the medullary sheath is interrupted and the axis-cylinder appears ; i, i, incisures of Schmidt. 38 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. thin layer of cementing substance which extends inward toward the axis-cylinder. These interannular segments of the nerve-fibre vary greatly in length. When several nerve-fibres lie parallel with each other, the segments of four or five of them often seem to have about the same length, and then the series appears interrupted by some segment considerably longer or shorter than the rest. Each interannular segment of a nerve-fibre has a flattened ellip- tical nucleus, situated nearly equidistant between the two annular constrictions which limit the segment. This nucleus often has a nucleolus ; between the nucleus and the myelin there exists a minute mass of protoplasm which is spread beneath the membrane of Schwann and fixed to it. Scattered irregularly along each interannular seg- ment are delicate lines or fissures which seem to run obliquely through the medullary sheath from the mem- brane on the surface of the nerve-fibre to the axis-cyl- inder. Their significance is not yet determined ; they are called the " incisures of Schmidt." (See Fig. 4.) 23. The complex microscopic structure of the med- ullated nerve-fibre, as described above outer sheath, medullary sheath, axis-cylinder, interannular segments limited at each end by annular constrictions, nucleus and nucleolus, and incisures of Schmidt cannot be considered as "ultimate," even in the restricted sense i n which we use the word as applied to what the eye can see b y the aid of optical instruments. Other still sciatic of an more minute characteristics of its structure must be Adult Babbit. ' (B ~ Briefly mentioned, although with the understanding FIG. 5 Medui- an nuiar con- that their interpretation, and even their existence, is cy, axis'-cyi- more doubtful than are the characteristics already de- i n d e r with . , -, double con- Scribed. tour showing. The f a(jt ^^ isolated axis-cylinders, when submitted to the action of picrocarminate of ammonia, are stained red along their median line, while an extremely thin homogeneous border is left comparatively uncolored, and the additional fact that minute flakes or scales sometimes seem to appear upon their surface, have led to the conjecture that the axis-cylinder has a double structure. The clear homogeneous border probably corresponds to the so-called " sheath of Mauthner." ' The "fibrillated" appearance of the axis-cylinder under the mi- croscope has already been referred to as undoubted ; but the exact 1 See Ranvier, Traite Technique d'Histologie, i., pp. 738, 742. DOUBLE CONTOUR OF AXIS-CYLINDER. 39 nature and the interpretation of this appearance are still matters of dispute. On account of the fact that the light must be passed through two or perhaps three cylinders in order to reach the inte- rior structure of the nerve-fibre, its examination under the high powers of the microscope which are necessary to see this fibrillated structure is extremely difficult. In spite of this difficulty, however, Hans Schultze l claims that the fibrils of the axis-cylinder can be FIG. 6. Fibrillated Appearance of the Axis-cylinders of Medullated Nerve-fibres. (Hans Schultze.) distinctly traced in living fibres, when these are in process of form- ing and are still naked, or where they issue from the cells without a medullary sheath, or where they lose this sheath at the annular constrictions or in the peripheral end-plexuses. Various prepara- tions of dead nerve-fibre, treated with different reagents, seem to demonstrate the same fibrillated structure. Moreover, from the fact that the nervous substance of the fibrils takes a carmine tinge, while the interfibrillary nucleated substance remains stained steel- blue with the nitrate of silver, Schultze argues that the axis-cylinder consists of two chemical substances. The fibrillated appearance can, therefore, scarcely be considered as due to the arrangement of 1 In the Archiv f. Anat. und Physiol., 1878, Auat. Abtli., pp. 259-285. 40 FOEM OF THE NEEVOUS ELEMENTS. I rows of granules in straight lines. 1 According to T. W. Engel- mann, 2 in good preparations these fibrils appear distinct, and are never seen to anastomose or form a plexus of fibrils. By actual count the number of fibrils remains the same at any rate, between any two annular constrictions ; nor are they apparently interrupted in their course by these constrictions. The fibrils, as found in different nerve-fibres, seem not to differ in respect to size or closeness of contact, but their number differs in nerve-fibres of different sizes. Engel- mann counted about four hundred in the thickest fibres taken from the mo- tor roots of the spinal \ii! HI Illl Mi cord of the frog. The closeness of their contact, and the smallness of their number, as compared with that of the fibrils into which the fibre breaks up at its peripheral termina- tions, make it difficult to see how these subdivi- sions of the axis-cylinder can have any separate function as the conduc- tors of nervous impulses. Further information re- l|] HI garding them must be left to subsequent researches. (See Fig. 6.) The strict continuity of the axis-cylinder through the annular constrictions maybe called in question. Engelmann found that, on being treated with nitrate of silver, the axis-cylinders, as a rule, were broken off at the annular constric- tions or nodes. 3 Out of a hundred cases of broken cylinders only four appeared where they had not parted in the middle of these constrictions. It is not to be inferred from this, however, that nor- mal and living nerve-fibres are interrupted by a space of even mi- ' So article of H. D. Schmidt, in the Monthly Micr. Jour. , 1874, vol. xii. a Pfluger's Archiv, xxii., p. 26. 3 Pfliiger's Archiv, xxii., pp. 1-24. FIG. 7. Fibrillated Axis-cylinders broken at the Nodes of Ranvier. (Engelmann.) THE FIBRES OF EEMAK. 41 croscopic proportions at these nodes ; no such interruption appears. But it is by no means impossible that these fibres are to be regarded as composed of a number of annular segments cemented together each separate fibril placed exactly end to end with its fellow in the adjoining segments. Such an arrangement would accord with the theory which regards the segments as elongated and developed nerve-cells. 24. Non-medullated nerve-fibres, or fibres of Remak, differ from those already described in that they do not possess a medullary sheath. They are grayish and translucent, longitudinally striated, with flattened elon- gated nuclei lying at frequent intervals upon their surface. When gathered together within a sheath of neurilemma, they are not placed side by side as are the medullated nerve- tubes ; they are rather formed in the interior of the nerve, where they unite and divide and make an intricate plexus or network of fibres. They are grouped in larger bundles, some- times alone, but more frequently in connec- tion with medullated fibres. Their striated appearance is probably due to the fact that they, like the axis-cylinder of the medullated nerve-fibres, are composed of numerous fibrils. As has already been said, they belong to the sympathetic system. 25. The size of different nerve-fibres in the human body varies greatly, according to their kind, position, and, perhaps, function. As a rule the non - medullated fibres are smaller than the medullated, the former be- ing from -g-oVir to -g-g-Vo of an inch in diam- eter, and the latter (in the trunk and branches FIG. 8. Fibres of Remak from of the nerve) from y-^Vo to ^^ of an inch. But this rule is not always followed. In the K H _ white matter of the cord the medullated Bonding to fibrhs. fibres range in size from y^ to ^Vir of an inch, in parts of the anterior columns, and about T ^ of an inch in those regions of the lateral and posterior columns which are nearest the gray matter of the cord. In the gray matter of the cord and brain the fibres are much finer being from ^Vo" to iffanr of an inch in diameter, or Nucleus with surrounding protoplasm, p ; ft, striae cor- 42 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. even of an almost immeasurable fineness ; they are finest of all in the superficial layers of the brain and in the nerves of special sense. In some instances the axis-cylinder may be not more than y^gVo 0- of an inch in diameter. 26. The number of fibres which enter into the composition of individual nerves also varies greatly. In the common motor nerve of the tongue it has been estimated at about five thousand, in that of the eyes at fifteen thousand, in the optic nerve at one hundred thousand at least. 27. So-called ganglion-cells, or nerve-cells, are the second of the two structural elements which can be more minutely described as undoubtedly belonging to the nervous system. These bodies vary greatly in size and shape, but they all show, when subjected to microscopic examination, certain well-recognized common charac- teristics. Nerve-cells are irregular masses of protoplasm, finely granular and delicately striated, with a large nucleus which is well- defined and vesicular in appearance, and which usually contains a shining nucleolus ; they send off one or more processes. In the gray matter of the cord and brain they are embedded in the neuroglia or so-called " nerve-cement ; " in the smaller nervous centres, such as the ganglia of the sympathetic and the ganglia on the posterior roots of the spinal cord, they are surrounded by a capsule of con- nective tissue. 28. Careful microscopic investigation of the nerve-cell with high magnifying powers of the instrument reveals the great complexity of its structure. In describing this complex structure the bipolar ganglion-cell of the fish may be considered as a common type. Such a cell is called by Max Schultze ' a " nucleated swelling of the axis- cylinder." When found in the course of a nerve-fibre it appears at first sight as a complete interruption to the continuity of the fibre. Further examination is thought to show, however, that, when the fibre reaches the cell, the axis-cylinder loses its medul- lary sheath, and the fibrils which constitute the substance of the cylinder become dissociated, and continue their course over the surface of the " ganglionic globe " to its opposite pole ; here they reunite and form a fibre identical with the one that approached the nearer pole of the cell. The "ganglionic globe " itself appears to be composed of granular substance. We may distinguish, then, in such a ganglion-cell these two parts : (1) a fibrillary covering, the fibrils of which are continuous with the fibrils of the axis- cylinder on either side of the cell ; and (2) a granular globe con- taining near its surface a nucleus, within which one or more nucleoli 1 In Strieker, Human and Comparative Histology, i. , p. 1 74. NERVE-CELL FROM SPINAL GANGLION. 43 appear. l A repetition of these parts of the structure of the bipolar cell, it is claimed, may be expected and found in ganglionic nerve- cells in general. A microscopic structure substantially like that of the bipolar ganglion-cell of the fish, as already described, is found to belong to the multipolar cells of the anterior horns of the spinal cord of man, and of the ox, or of other mammals. Among the many processes given out by such a cell, the researches of Deiters and of others have demonstrated that ordinarily only one be- comes continuous with the axis-cylinder of the peripherally running nerve-fibre. This one, called the "prolongation (or process) of Dei- ters," has sometimes been distinctly seen to be fibrillated ; and it is supposed that its fibrils are, as a rule, continuous with those of the axis-cylinder of the nerve-fibre. Hence it is called the " axis-cylinder process." The other processes from the cell also seem to be fibrillar ; but the quantity of interfibrillar granular substance which they contain is greater than that in the axis-cylinder process. These fibrils ramify, anastomose with each other, and become lost in an intricate net- work of extremely minute nervous filaments. Over the surface and within the interior of the " ganglionic globe " of the multipolar cell the fibrils of all these processes run in every di- rection with bewildering complexity. Their relation to one another, and to the various parts of the substance of the cell, cannot be said to be determined with any degree of cer- tainty. Most of the fibrils appear only to tra- verse the ganglion-cells, but some of them, perhaps, originate within the cells. In the case of any thus originating, it is not as yet possible to say whether or not they arise out of the nuclei and nucleoli, and so, whether we may consider these parts of the cells as the special sources or cen- tres of the nerve-fibrils, as Harless, Meynert, and others have done. 2 1 See Ranvier, Traite Technique d'Histologie, i. , p. 712. a See, on this whole subject, Max Schultze in Strieker, Human and Compara- tive Histology, i., pp. 172-187 ; Ranvier, Traite Technique d'Histologie, i., pp. 710 ff. ; and Hans Schultze, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1878, pp. 259-285. FIG. 9. Nerve-cell from the Spinal Ganglion of the Ray. "5%. (Ranvier.) my, Medullary sheath of nerve-fibre, enclosing ca, the axis-cylinder, the fi- brils of which (/) separate and run over the gangli- onic globe, m; n, nu- cleus. 44 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. 29. The variety of shapes taken by the nerve-cells has already "been mentioned, as well as the fact that they may be classified as unipolar, bipolar, and multipolar. Some are nearly round ; others ovoidal, caudate, stellate, or shaped like a flask or the blade of a paddle. Still others appear somewhat like the foot of an animal with claws ; while the branching processes of others give them the appearance of sprawling out irregularly in a half-score of different directions. To a certain extent the shape of the cells is character- istic of that region of the central nervous system where they are FIG. 10. Multipolar Ganglion-cell from the Anterior Horn of the Gray Substance of the Spinal Cord of the Ox. (After Deiters.) 1, Nucleus ; 2, axis-cylinder process ; 3, 3, branching found, in most abundant numbers, embedded in the neuroglia. For example, large ganglion -cells of irregular shape, with branch- ing processes, which have been called " motor," are found in the ante- rior horns of the gray matter of the spinal cord ; pyramidal cells of various sizes, with processes from both base and apex, are character- istic of the cortex of the cerebrum ; and just at the inner edge of the gray cortical matter in the cerebellum appear irregular globu- lar or ovoidal cells, which send off one or two branching processes toward the surface of the cerebrum. The ganglion-cells of the sym- pathetic also are usually globular or ovoidal, and have one or more processes which pierce their capsule and become non-medullated THE GANGLION-CELL AS A TYPE. 45 nerve-fibres. Unipolar cells are found in the spinal ganglia of the higher animals, bipolar in the spinal ganglia of fishes. Nerve-cells vary in size as much as in shape ; the limits may per- haps be given as from about ^J^- to ^Vo f an inch- 1 No special physiological significance can in any case be assigned to the shape of the nerve-cell ; we are wholly ignorant of the meaning of such a variety of forms, and of the value of any particlar form in a given position. It is possible, however, that the large size of the so-called "motor-cells" of the anterior horns of the spinal cord is indicative of their special physiological function. We may also fairly incline to interpret the multiplication of ganglion-cells in the central parts of the nervous system as significant of the large amount and high quality of work which must be done by them within these centres. It is possible that the shape of the cells is largely due to the mechanical conditions which control their de- velopment within the embryo ; but upon this subject we have scarcely any trustworthy information. 30. The structure of the nerve -fibres and nerve-cells, and the nature of the histological relations which apparently exist between the two, have led to a captivating theory intended to reduce all the elements of the nervous mechanism to modifications of a single form. Extremely different in structure as the various parts of the nervous system obviously are, we are told that modern histological science refers them all, for their elements, to " one perfectly defi- nite type ; " 2 this type is the ganglionic nerve-cell. The important common characteristic, that they send out prolongations which become nerve-fibres, is assumed to belong to all such cells. The fibres are, accordingly, considered to be prolongations of the cells, and to be formed of substance like that of the source from which they appear to arise. Nerve-fibres may then be described as nerve- cells drawn out into an extremely long peduncle, which serves to connect them with other similar cells and fibres, or with certain muscular fibres which the nervous matter commands. This mor- phological theory of the nervous elements rests, however, upon a doubtful basis, and certain strong objections may be brought against it. We are probably warranted simply in asserting that both classes of these elements, like the other primary structural forms of the body, may be regarded as differentiations of one type (the cell) under conditions of which we are almost wholly ignorant. There is accumulating evidence in favor of the view that nerve- 1 See an article of J. Hoffmann in the American Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, August, 1883, pp. 432 ff. 2 Ranvier, Traite Technique d'Histologie, i. , p. 710. 46 FORM OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. fibres are, in general, connected, both histologically and physiologi- cally, with the nerve-cells. One of the processes of each cell may, therefore, as a rule, be regarded as continuous with the axis-cylin- der of a nerve-fibre. It is true that this connection can by no means always be traced by the microscope. A score of years ago one investigator l declared that, after having examined the gray matter of the spinal cord a great number of times, he had demon- strated this alleged connection only very rarely. Eepeated obser- vations since, of the improved modern kind, have not done away with the comparative infrequency of the desired demonstration. But from the very nature of the case a great number of the nerve- fibres must have their connection with the cells broken off by the treatment they receive in preparation for examination. And the positive cases where such connection has been traced may fairly be said to have indicated the rule. Moreover, the facts of physiology (to which reference will be made subsequently) seem to favor such a view of the anatomical relation of these two elements of the ner- vous system. Additional evidence upon this subject may perhaps be derived from the recent researches of E. A. Birge. 2 This investigator under- took the gigantic task of counting the nervous elements in the gan- glia and roots of the spinal cord of a large number of frogs. He apparently discovered a general relation indicating some agreement in the number of the so-called motor-cells and the fibres alleged to originate from these cells. In one case (No. 42) an actual count of ten motor-roots gave 5,734 fibres and 5,777 cells on the right, and 5,740 cells on the left side of the cord. Other results of counting, however, were by no means so favorable to the statement that the number of the fibres in the roots agrees exactly with the number of cells in the corresponding region of the cord. Nor could more complete results of this kind form any sufficient warrant for the conclusion that everywhere in the nervous system the number of fibres corresponds with the cells, or that the nerve-fibres all spring from the nerve-cells ; much less, that they may be reduced to one form of such cells as to a perfectly definite type. 31. The discussion of the chemical constitution and structural form of the elements of the nervous system introduces the ques- tion as to the Functions of these Elements. This question must be answered, if at all, by the science of physiology. And in view 1 Vulpian, see Lemons sur la Physiologie du Systeme Nerveux, p. 318, Lect- ure of July 9, 1864. Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1882, Physiolog. Abtli., pp. 435-479, espe- cially p. 471. EXCITABILITY AND CONDUCTIVITY. 47 of our ignorance of the genuine nervous character of all other claimants to a place among the elements of the nervous system, our inquiry is narrowed to the following terms : What can nerve-fibres and ganglionic nerve-cells do? With the activities of these ele- ments, as combined into the complex organs of the human nervous mechanism, the whole of our subsequent examination is designed to deal. We speak here very briefly of certain fundamental prop- erties of the two nerve-elements already described that is ; of the nerve-fibres as gathered into bundles called nerves, and of the cells as collected into ganglia and connected with these nerves. Nerves and nerve-cells have certain properties in common ; that is to say, within certain limits both can do the same things. Both are capable of becoming the subjects of a specific kind of molecu* lar motion which we are entitled to consider as distinctively " neu- ral" but about whose nature and mathematical or physical relations to other modes of the molecular motion of matter we are still al- most totally ignorant. Both are also capable of propagating this distinctively " neural commotion " from one portion of their struct- ure to another. In a word, both nerve-fibres and nerve-cells have the properties of Excitability and Conductivity ; and the excitation and conduction of excitation which these nervous elements display are of a kind peculiar to themselves. It is the production, propa- gation, modification, and distribution of this distinctive nerve-com- motion which constitutes the one constant function, or property, of the nervous elements, whether considered as isolated or as com- bined into organs. It is customary with some writers to speak of the production of psychical phenomena as the crowning function of the nervous system. But whatever may be the view we shall find ourselves compelled to take of the relations between the loca- tion, quantity, quality, and combinations of this neural molecular motion and the phenomena of self-conscious life, from our present point of view the utterances of such writers if designed as anything other than figures of speech which need to be explained in detail to be even suggestive of those real facts and relations which they, in truth, only symbolize are of little interest or value. We are speak- ing of a material structure, which, although alive and standing in altogether unique relations to psychical phenomena, is, nevertheless, in itself considered, nothing but a very complex collection of moving molecules. The peculiar form of molecular motion which charac- terizes this structure namely, so-called " nerve-commotion " is its unique function. Inasmuch as such nerve-commotion may be considered as originally set up in a single nervous element or group of elements, and then propagated from this initial point along cer- 48 FUNCTION OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. tain more or less definitely marked tracts to other elements or groups of elements, we may divide the one function into two the function of excitation and the function of conduction. 32. Nerve-commotion, or neural molecular action, is, of course, never an uncaused event. It begins at certain points in the ner- vous elements, where it is set agoing by the application of appropri- ate causes of excitation. The causes of the excitation of the ner- vous elements are called "stimuli." Stimuli are of two general kinds external and internal External stimuli comprise all such modes of the motion of matter as act upon the peripheral parts of the nervous system, and so produce within it a state of excitation or nerve-commotion ; among these are light, heat, chemical changes, etc. Internal stimuli are such as act upon the nerve-cells of the central organs ; they consist, in general, of changes in the blood produced by an increase or decrease of oxygen, the presence of drugs, etc. The susceptibility of a nerve to any form of external stimulus is called its " irritability ; " and when a nerve will no longer respond to such stimulus by being thrown into a condition of excitation, it is said to have lost its irritability. As the word is generally used, then, the irritability of a nerve is its property of excitability under the action of some form of external stimulus. When excited by such stimulus it is said to be irritated. We shall use both sets of words, reserving the words " excitation " and " ex- citability " for the general state and function of all nervous tissue considered as capable of a specific molecular commotion ' a nerve- commotion. 33. But although all the nervous elements may be said to have the properties of neural excitability and conductivity, important differences arise as to the conditions under which, and as to the modes in which, they exercise their functions when combined into a complex nervous system. In the normal condition of such a s} 7 s- tem it is by no means all of its parts which are directly excitable, whether by external or by internal stimuli ; nor is the effect of the excitation of both the elementary structural forms of such a system exactly the same. A single nerve may, indeed, be separated from the other parts of the nervous system, with a muscle attached, and may then be made to exercise its neural function in moving the muscle by being itself stimulated with different kinds of stimuli at different points along its course. But in their normal place and condition nerves are never excited by the direct application of 1 It is a pity that we have in English no one word which can be used under all conditions, and compounded ad libitum, in order to designate a property, a process, a state, etc., as can the German word Erregen, Erregung, etc. GANGLION-CELLS AS DISTRIBUTORY. 49 stimuli ; they are always excited indirectly by the propagation to them of nerve-commotion which originates in the central organs or in the end-organs. The distinctive office of the nerves is, then, to act as conductors of molecular motion set up in themselves by the direct excitation of the nervous elements in which they either cen- trally or peripherally terminate. Moreover, large portions of the central organs do not respond to the direct application of various kinds of stimuli to their surface. We are obliged, then, to suppose that many of the nerve-cells which compose these organs are excita- ble only by stimulation through the nerve-fibres that run into them. The case of the normal nervous system, with respect to its excita- bility, may, then, be briefly described in the following terms : The end-organs of sense are directly excitable by external stimuli, and each specific kind of end-organ which is characteristic of a particu- lar sense is excitable only by the specific kind of stimuli appropri- ate to that sense. The afferent or centripetal nerves are excited only by the end-organs of sense ; their specific function is to con- duct the nerve-commotion, started by the external stimuli in these end-organs, toward the central organs. The efferent or centrifugal nerves are not directly excited by either internal or external stimuli, but only by the central organs ; their specific function is to conduct the nerve-commotion started in them by the central organs to the muscles, glands, etc. to the peripheral parts of the body which are to be moved through their excitation. The central nerve-cells themselves are excited either through the nerve-commotion brought to them by the afferent nerves or by internal stimuli. Nerve- commotions are also said to arise in them automatically ; but the facts covered by the term " automatic " require further distinc- tions to be made as to the functional activity of the different nerve- elements. 34. If the distinctive normal function of the nerves is the con- ducting of neural molecular motion between the central organs and the end-organs, the function of the ganglion-cells can by no means be pronounced so simple. These cells are, indeed, also con- ductors of nerve-commotion ; within the central organs they form important parts of the tracts along which such commotion passes. They serve also as points for the division and redistribution of this commotion ; they may be spoken of as switching-places in the sys- tem or network of tracts. In these " shunting-places " of the cell many lines of conduction meet ; and the one of them taken by any impulse entering the cell may depend upon the relative amount of resistance offered by these lines. The work of the cell may then be considered as "re-directive." The office of the cell in distri- 4 50 FUNCTION OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. bution of the nerve-commotion may also be either to condense or to disperse it ; in the former case the distribution might be spoken spoken of as " associative," in the latter as " dissociative." 1 They may also intensify or diminish the nerve-commotion entering them. But the nerve-cells have also other functions, or forms of the one neural function, which have been classed as either (a) automatic, (6) reflex, or (c) inhibitory. (a.) Automatism, or the power of initiating the peculiar form of molecular motion known as "vital impulses," independently of the action of any discoverable stimulus from without, is one of the fundamental properties of protoplasm. An amoeba, for example, is a minute mass of such protoplasm ; it executes movements which can- not be wholly explained by reference to any changes in its environ- ment. The difficulty of distinguishing automatic from reflex action in the spinal cord, and muscular from nervous automatism in the sporadic ganglia, need not concern us at present. According to Eckhard 2 two kinds of this automatic function of the ganglion-cells may be distinguished viz., the automatic-tonic and the automatic- rhythmic. In the former case the control of the cells over the muscular structures by means of the efferent nerves is irregular ; in the latter this control results in the nearly simultaneous contrac- tion of the same set of such structures, repeated at regular intervals ; as is the case in the movements of the heart and luDgs. In neither case, however, can we form any clear conception of the origin within the cells of this neural commotion, of the nature of the forces at work to produce it, or of the changes in material that are involved in it. We can only say that as yet we know no reasons lying out- side of the structure and activities of the living nerve-cells them- selves which will account for the starting of the excitation. In this sense, at least, such neural action is "automatic." (b.) The reflex function of the ganglion-cells admits of a some- what more detailed and satisfactory statement ; but the phenomena and laws of reflex nervous action are properly discussed as belong- ing to the central organs of the nervous system. It is enough, at present, to note that the great changes which take place in the character of nervous impulses, when, after entering the central organs by the afferent tracts, they are, as it is said, " reflected " from those organs along the efferent tracts, are indubitable evi- dence of the specific molecular activity of the ganglion-cells. For the afferent impulses are, in fact, not simply reflected in these cells ; 1 See A. Hill, The Plan of the Central Nervous System, p. 2. Cambridge, 1885. 2 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 19 f. GANGLION-CELLS AS INHIBITORY. 51 they are greatly modified as to their number, intensity, character, and distribution. This modification is proof of profound molecu- lar changes that are instituted in the substance of the cells them- selves. It is one proof, among others, that a large expenditure of energy in the cells accompanies the transmutation of afferent into efferent impulses. (c.) The function of inhibition, as ascribed to ganglion-cells, must be pronounced more doubtful in character than either of the two foregoing. It was found by Wundt * that nervous impulses are delayed on passing through the spinal ganglion. Such impulses seem also to consume an amount of time in travelling along or through the cord that cannot readily be accounted for as wholly due to the length of the nervous tracts which they thus traverse. But until our information is more precise as to the microscopic structure of the cord, and as to the tracts within it which the ner- vous impulses follow, we cannot say with confidence how much of this delay is due to molecular changes peculiar to the cells them- selves. That the automatic and reflex functions of the medulla oblongata may be compounded, as it were, in such way as either to inhibit or to accelerate the action of the heart and lungs and mus- cular walls of the arteries, is a well-known fact. It has already been said that nerve-cells may diminish as well as intensify the nerve-commotion entering them. When afferent impulses reach the ganglion-cells of the centres, and find them already at work, such impulses result, according to circumstances, in either inhibiting or augmenting this activity. 2 Moreover, the tone given forth by a muscle, when tetanized by stimulating the nerve to which the mus- cle is attached with repeated induction-shocks, has the same num- ber of vibrations per second as there are of such shocks ; but the tone given forth by muscle tetanized through the spinal cord, or by action of the will, has a constant number of vibrations, namely, about nineteen per second. It would appear from this, also, that the central apparatus of nerve-cells controls the impulses which tetanize the muscle, according to the molecular structure and changes of those cells. In this sense, then, the cells may be said to exercise inhibitory functions under certain conditions. 35. A consideration of the different effects produced by the conduction of nervous impulses along the different nerves of the system would seem at first to justify the classification of the nerves according to the varieties of their functional activity. In this way 1 Untersuchungen zur Mechanik der Nerven, 1876, Abth. ii., pp. 45 ff. 2 Comp. Foster, A Text-book of Physiology, fourth edition, p. 134. New York, 1880. 52 FUNCTION OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. we should distinguish the following classes : (a) nerves of motion controlling the muscular apparatus, whether of smooth or of striated muscular fibres ; (6) nerves of inhibition ; (c) nerves of secretion ; (d) trophic nerves, or nerves which have a direct influence upon nu- trition ; (e) centripetal nerves that have no sensory function ; and, finally, (f) sensory nerves, or those the excitation of which may result in conscious sensation. 1 That the irritation of different nerves may have results so differ- ent as are indicated by the foregoing classes must indeed be ad- mitted ; but it is quite another question whether this difference is not wholly due to the sources of origin for the nerve-commotions sent along them, and to the structures in which it terminates, rather than to any difference in the essential physiological function of the nerves themselves. Just as the same electrical current may pass along the same kind of wire, and write a message, or ring a bell, or move the legs of a frog ; just so the irritation of certain fibres of the pneumogastric nerve results in controlling the motion of the heart ; the irritation of other nerves seems to have an immediate metabolic effect in directing the secretory processes ; that of still others pro- foundly modifies the nutrition of the portions of the body to which they are distributed. All these effects are in appearance greatly unlike the movement of a muscle unde^ stimulation from a nerve. With regard to the influence of the nerves on nutrition (their tro- phic function) it is not necessary, in order to account for it, that some specific action of a particular kind of nerves should be as- sumed. We should suppose, of course, that the chemical processes in which nutrition consists would be changed in character by the molecular changes in the tissue which irritating any of the nerve- fibres running into it would inevitably bring about. Further consideration of the six possible classes of nerves given above reveals the fact that they may all be reduced to two, accord- ing to the direction in which their function of conducting nerve- commotion is exercised. The first four conduct it outward from the nervous centres, and are therefore called " efferent ; " the last two conduct it inward toward the nervous centres, and are there- fore called " afferent." Into these two kinds all nerves are custom- arily divided, so far as their physiological function is concerned. 36. The further question now arises, Whether the general phy- siological function of these two principal classes of nerves differs in kind as well as in direction ; or are afferent and efferent nerves to be identified so far as their specific neural function is concerned ? Inasmuch as every nerve-fibre, in the normal condition of the ner- 1 Comp. Sigmund Mayer, in Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., II., i., pp. 200 ff. AFFERENT AND EFFERENT NERVES. 53 vous system, is a stretch of nervous matter between two termina- tions a point of origin and a point of issue for the state of excita- tion it might, at first, seem simpler to consider it as intrinsically capable of propagating nerve-commotion in one direction only. It would be concluded, then, that the behavior of afferent and effer- ent nerves, when stimulated, is essentially different with respect to their molecular processes. Certain phenomena are sometimes urged in favor of such a conclusion. The application of heat to an efferent (or motor) nerve causes no contraction in the muscle which the nerve supplies ; heat does not appear to be a stimulus of such nerves. On the contrary, Grtitzner * concluded that heating the different kinds of afferent nerves to from about 115 to 125 Fahr. does excite them. The passage of a constant current along an efferent nerve, so long as this cur- rent does not suddenly change in strength, does not stimulate this nerve so that the muscle contracts ; but such a current does excite nervous impulses in a sensory nerve. Moreover, certain chemical substances are said to act as stimuli on efferent nerves which have no such effect upon sensory nerves. On the other hand, the rate of conduction in both afferent and efferent fibres, under similar conditions, is about the same. The laws which evince the behavior of nerves under stimulation by elec- tricity, and which are most relied upon as a basis for a mechanical theory of the nervous system, are largely the same for both kinds of fibres. There is a large amount of scientific information, called " general physiology of the nerves," which looks in the direction of identifying the molecular processes in the two classes of nerve- fibres. This is true in particular of the remarkable phenomenon known as the "negative variation "of the nerve-current. More- over, the marked difference (referred to above) in the results ob- tained by stimulating motor nerves on the one hand, and sensory nerves on the other, is plainly, to a great extent, due to the differ- ence in the sources of the stimulation ; the former are excited by the central organs, the latter by the end-organs of sense. The mo- lecular structure of these two sets of organs, and their consequent molecular motion when acted upon by the appropriate stimuli, dif- fer widely ; we do not, then, need to assume a specific difference in the function of the connecting nerve-strands in order to account for a marked difference in the results. Thus it may be assumed that molecular disturbances, which would be quite powerless to stir the sluggish muscle-fibres when transmitted to them by a motor nerve, would occasion profound changes in the more sensitive 1 Pfliiger's Archiv, xvii., p. 215. 54 FUNCTION OF THE NERVOUS ELEMENTS. structure of the ganglion-cells when transmitted to the latter by a sensory nerve. Various attempts have been made to demonstrate, experimen- tally, that motor and sensory nerves can perform each other's func- tions. Such experiments have not yet been altogether successful. They consist, in general, of attempts to unite by healing the cen- tral part of a divided sensory nerve and the peripheral part of a divided motor nerve, and then to show that the nerve thus united discharges certain sensory or motor functions, as the case may be. Philipeaux and Vulpian, 1 after various rather unsuccessful attempts of Flourens, Bidder, Schiff, and others, succeeded in uniting the central portion of the lingual (or sensory gustatory) nerve of young dogs with the peripheral end of the hypoglossal (motor nerve of the tongue) on the same side. Stimulation of the lingual nerve above the point of union then produced contractions in the hypoglossal of the same side, and that even when the lin- gual was divided high up so as to preclude any reflex action. But the action obtained was found to be apparently due to the chorda (motor) fibres present in the lingual. In 1863 Bert succeeded in reversing the course of the nerve-fibres in the tail of a rat, by bend- ing this appendage over and implanting its end in the animal's back. After healing had taken place, the transplanted tail was cut off near its origin, and found to be sensitive of course, in the re- verse direction of the nerve-fibres from the natural one. This experiment would seem, then, to show that sensory nerve-fibres, when reversed, can transmit sensory impulses in the direction which was formerly centrifugal. The experiments of Ktihne * and others upon the intramuscular ramifications of the nerve-fibres in the sartorius muscle of the frog point in the same direction. If the broad end of this muscle be divided by a longitudinal slit into a forked shape, then stimulation of one of the two tines of the fork beyond their division will stimulate the fibrils of the other tine ; that is, the minute twigs of the motor nerve in the tine which is directly stimulated have acted centripetally, and the excitation has then descended the twigs of the other tine. For all the foregoing, and for other reasons, we seem warranted in assuming that there is no such specific difference in the func- tion of the two kinds of nerves as is dependent upon the peculiar structure or molecular processes of each kind. Both afferent and 1 See Vulpian, Lemons sur la Physiologie du Systc^me Nerveux, etc., pp. 274 ff. ; and comp. the remarks of Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., II., i., pp. 10 ff., and of Foster, Text-book of Physiology, pp. 503-508. 2 Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc., 1859, pp. 595 ff. PROPERTIES OF ALL NERVES. 55 efferent nerves are probably capable of the same kind of molecular commotion called nervous excitation, and of conducting this commo- tion in either direction. The marked difference in the results of the exercise of this function in the two cases is probably due chiefly to the difference in the organs from which the excitation of the nerve starts, and into which it is discharged. With respect to neural mo- lecular disturbances, all nerves are excitable, conductors of excita- tion, and exciters of nerve-cells and muscle-fibres. And if to this description we add the statement that nerve-cells can, acting auto- matically, originate this nerve-commotion, can modify its character profoundly as it passes through them, and distribute it in various directions, we state, in the most general form, what is at present known as to the functions of the nervous elements. CHAPTEK II. COMBINATION OF THE NEEVOUS ELEMENTS INTO A SYSTEM. 1. IN the last chapter the nervous elements were considered, as far as possible, without reference to their combination for the ac- complishment of a common work. Regarded as isolated, and as possessed only of those properties which belong to all living mat- ter of the peculiar chemical constitution and structural form which are described by the word "nervous," these elements are of great interest to physiological and psycho-physical researches. But in their normal position and activity the nerve-fibres and nerve-cells are always combined into certain organs, which are then arranged in a symmetrical whole. Thus combined they are dependent upon each other for the parts which they play in the entire system. The condition and function of each element are thus determined by the condition and function of the rest. One part of this system excites another, or modifies the excitation received from another. We are unable to isolate perfectly any one of these elements, and so study its normal functions apart. It is, indeed, possible to dissect out a nerve with a muscle attached, to keep it alive for a time, and thus to inquire what an isolated nerve will do. In this way many of the most important discoveries in the general physiology of the nerves have been made. But every nerve is itself a compound of nervous elements which have been placed for purposes of experiment under abnormal conditions. The action of the nerve-cells, even when gathered into small masses called ganglia, is not open to direct in- spection. Moreover, when different tracts of nerves, or different regions in the central organs where ganglion-cells abound, are par- tially isolated by being laid bare for the direct application of stimu- lus, just so far as they are separated from the system they are in abnormal condition and show abnormal results ; and just so far as they are normal in condition and function they are still connected with the system. It is the mutual condition and reciprocal action of the elements, when combined into this totality, which constitute MECHANISM OF THE AMCEBA. 57 the nervous mechanism. A brief description of the manner of this combination is, then, indispensable at this point. 2. It will be of great service toward understanding such a de- scription if it is begun under the guidance of some appropriate idea. Nerve-fibres and nerve-cells exist in enormous numbers within the human nervous system, and are combined in different proportions to make the different organs of this system. The significance of the combination appears only in the light of reflection upon the amount and kind of work which is to be done. The office of the nervous mechanism has been said (p. 18 f.) to be that of " concate- nating " all the functions of the living body in accordance with the complex internal and external conditions to which it is subject. But in the case of any of the higher animals, and especially in the case of man, this one office requires the doing of a quantity and variety of work that are proportionate to the complexity of these conditions. How shall such a quantity and variety of work be done ? To answer this question may be said speaking figuratively to be the problem before the nervous system. The actual arrangement of the elements of this system, in the exercise of their reciprocally conditioned activities, is the solution of the problem. As in all very complex questions of this sort, so this particular problem is solved by a wise division of labor. The manner in which the human nervous mechanism is developed as a response to the before-mentioned problem is made clear by con- sidering, in the first place, a much simpler form of the same prob- lem. The simple protoplasmic speck called an amoeba may be con- sidered as a living molecular mechanism. It appears, even under the higher powers of the microscope, as almost wholly, if not quite, composed of undifferentiated protoplasm, in the midst of which, as a rule, lies a single nucleus. If differentiated at all, it may be ob- served to have a somewhat solid external layer, called an ectosarc, and a more fluid granular interior, called endosarc. But minute and almost structureless as it appears, the amoeba is really com- posed of a great number of molecules that are undergoing constant change ; and it is capable of exercising several wonderful functions that do not belong to any non-living collection of molecules. Its sub- stance is metabolic, respiratory, reproductive. The protoplasm of the amoeba is the subject of constant chemical alterations, by which the old protoplasm is broken up and its products cast off, while new protoplasm is formed. Oxygen is assumed by this substance and carbonic acid excreted. The unit which is constituted by the amoeba may, by fission (or by other means), divide into two parts, each of which becomes a fresh unit. But more important for our 58 PLAN OF A NEKVOUS SYSTEM. purpose is the fact that the amoeba is irritable and automatic. It is almost unceasingly in motion. It is living matter ; and when acted on by stimuli, it suffers an explosion of energy which gener- ally results in a change of place and form. Inasmuch as these pe- culiar " amoeboid " movements seem substantially identical with those which occur in a muscle and result in its contraction, the animalcule may be said to be contractile. But inasmuch as some of these movements cannot be ascribed to irritation of the external molecules of the amoeba by the surrounding medium, but seem rather to be due to energy set free in consequence of unknown in- ternal changes, we call it automatic. We say, " it has a will of its own." Thus does the molecular mechanism of this small bit of protoplasm, under the stimulus of changes in the pressure and temperature of its medium, and in accordance with the unknown laws of its internal self-originating changes, solve the problem pre- sented to it. Let it be supposed that the problem becomes more complicated, and the animal structure which is to solve it correspondingly com- plex. The metabolic function of the animal may then be assigned to a separate system of structures ; and the closely related secretory and excretory functions as well. The reproductive function may then also -acquire its own peculiar organs. The muscles perform movements in masses because they retain in an eminent degree the " amoeboid " contractility. But the property of being irritable and automatic becomes the special endowment of the nervous system. All these different systems, in order that they may be moved in united masses, are then adjusted to a mechanical framework (of in- different value so far as really vital changes are concerned) of carti- lage, bone, etc. But the eminently irritable and automatic system of molecules called nervous must undergo a further differentiation of function. In the structureless protoplasm of the amoeba, the external mole- cules are, of course, the ones primarily to be affected by the exter- nal stimuli. It is with the internal molecules, on the other hand, that the changes called " automatic " begin. But the continual flux of its protoplasmic substance indicates that, in its simplest form, any of the molecules of the animalcule may in turn act either as irritable or as automatic. The primary differentiation of this substance into ectosarc and endosarc points, however, to a division of labor. By this primary differentiation of the substance of the animal, one cell, or group of cells, becomes more eminently irritable, another automatic. The former has thus been fitted for the spe- TRIPLE FORM OF THE SYSTEM. 59 cial work of responding to external stimuli by vital impulses ; the latter for that of initiating so-called automatic impulses. The position of the former in the animal mechanism will then natu- rally be at the surface, where it can be acted upon by the appro- priate external stimuli ; the position of the latter will naturally be withdrawn from the surface, where it can be protected from such stimuli and left undisturbed for action that is either automatic or excited by only internal stimuli. But if the two kinds of sub- stance are to perform one work, although by division of labor, they must be connected ; that is, the eminently irritable protoplasm of the surface must be joined by irritable protoplasmic material with the eminently automatic protoplasm of the interior. Three sets of organs are then called for in this rudimentary differentiation of the nervous substance : (1) superficial cells susceptible to exter- nal stimuli ; (2) central and eminently automatic cells, also suscep- tible to internal stimuli ; (3) a strand of irritable protoplasm con- necting the two. Yet one more step in the distribution of functions between the irritable and the automatic protoplasm of the complex animal or- ganism must be taken, in order to reach the fundamental triple ar- rangement of a nervous system. The system of eminently contrac- tile tissue called muscular must be brought into connection with the parts already described. In order that the more highly organized animal may, like the amoeba, both have and exercise " a will of its own," certain of its muscle-fibres must be placed under the control of the central and automatic cells. In order, also, that the entire muscular system may feel the reflex influence of external stimuli, and so, by co-ordinated contractions adapt the organs of the body to the changes of its environment, the muscle-fibres must be indi- rectly connected, through the automatic cells, with such superficial cells as are sensitive to these stimuli. The nervous system, there- fore, in its most fundamental form consists of these three sets of contrivances with their respective functions : (A) sensitive cells upon the surface of the body ; (B) central cells that are both auto- matic and modifiers and distributers of sensory impulses; (C) con- necting cords, or strands, that can convey the nervous impulses either centripetally from A to B, or centrifugally from B to the con- tractile muscular tissues of the body. Higher developments of this triple-formed fundamental type of a nervous system are reached by further differentiations of A, B, and G. If various kinds of stimuli are to act upon this system, then the sensitive cells upon the surface (A) must be modified into various external organs of sense ; and with these organs the ter- 60 PLAN OF A NERVOUS SYSTEM. minations of the centripetal or sensory nervous strands must be variously connected. The terminations of the centrifugal or moto* nervous strands may also be variously modified so as to connect with and control the contractile tissue of many sets of muscles. The central cells may be variously grouped and arranged, with functions more or less localized, so as to receive, modify, and dis- tribute, in manifold ways, the different sensory impulses ; and so as to co-ordinate these impulses for definite results in the periph- eral parts of the body. Other such central cells may become more particularly related to the phenomena of conscious sensation and volition. Such a highly developed nervous system will then con- sist of the following parts : (A) End-organs of Sense, like the skin, the eye, and the ear ; (A') End-organs of Motion, like the so-called motor end-plates and terminal nerve-bulbs ; (B) Central Organs, like the various peripheral and sporadic ganglia, the spinal cord> and brain, in which may come to exist (6) certain portions more distinctively automatic, (&') certain others more concerned in re- ceiving and distributing reflexly the sensory impulses, and (6") still others more particularly connected with the phenomena of con- sciousness ; and (C) Conducting Nerves, which will be either (c) centripetal, afferent, and sensory, or (c') centrifugal, efferent, and motor, designed to connect the central organs and the end-organs. We are now to consider the details with which such a highly de- veloped nervous system is actually constructed in the case of man. Our guides will, of course, be anatomy and histology. 3. In the manner already described (Chapter I., 19) the indi- vidual nerve-fibres are collected and bound together in fascicles or groups of fascicles, called nerves, and in larger bundles or nerve- trunks. The nerve-cells are grouped into minute masses of nervous matter, such as the sporadic ganglia found in the sinus, auricular walls, and auriculo-ventricular groove of the heart ; or they are gathered into larger bodies, intersected with most intricate ramifi- cations of the nerves and interspersed with the finely granular sub- stance called neuroglia, such as constitute the various parts of the brain and spinal cord. 4. The nerves and ganglionic masses of nervous matter in the human body are arranged in two great systems, the Sympathetic and the Cerebro-spinal. The Sympathetic Nervous System consists of a pair of nervous cords, situated one on each side of the spinal column ; of three main plexuses, situated in the cavities of the thorax and abdomen ; of a great number of smaller ganglia, lying in relation with the viscera of the same cavities, and widely distrib- uted over the body, especially in connection with the vascular sys- GANGLIA OF THE SYMPATHETIC. 61 tern ; and of a great multitude of fine distributory nerves. Each of the two cords consists of a number of ganglia united by interme- diate nerves. In the other regions of the spinal column the num- ber of these ganglia equals that of the vertebrae (sacral 5, lumbar 5, thoracic or dorsal 12), but in the neck (cervical) there are only 3. From this gangliated cord a communicating and a distribu- tory series of nerve-branches are derived. By the communicating branches each of which contains not only non-medullated nerve- fibres from the sympathetic syste"m to the cerebro-spinal nerves, but also medullated fibres from the cerebro-spinal to the sympa- thetic the two systems are brought into close anatomical and physiological relation, and a kind of double interchange takes place between them. The distributory branches of nerves in the sympa- thetic system bring the gangliated cord into connection with the blood-vessels and viscera of the body. The involuntary muscles in the coats of these vessels and in the walls of the viscera are thus bound together, and through the sympathetic fibres brought under the control of the cerebro-spinal axis. The three main plex- uses referred to are collections of nerve-cells and a dense plexiform arrangement of nerve-fibres. One of them is situated at the base of the heart, to which it gives off branches that wind around that organ and penetrate its muscular substance ; another is placed at the upper part of the abdominal cavity, and gives origin to numer- ous plexiform branches that supply the viscera of the abdomen ; the third is in front of the last lumbar vertebra, and supplies the vaso-motor nerves and nerves of the muscular coats and mucous membranes of the various organs in that region of the body. Fur- ther details in the anatomy of the sympathetic nervous system are of little interest to psycho-physical studies. To such studies it is of great interest, however, to know that this system forms a bond between the sensations, emotions, and ideas which have their physical basis in the molecular condition of the cerebro-spinal centres, and those various organs in the thoracic and abdominal regions whose condition is so closely related to such psychical states. The effect of certain emotions, for example, upon the con- dition of the circulation, digestion, etc., is too well known to re- quire a lengthy statement. 5. The Brain and Spinal Cord are the great centres of the cere- bro-spinal system. These bodies are situated in the bony cavity of the skull and spinal column. They have three Coverings or Mem- branes, the innermost one of which is directly united with the sur- face of the nervous substance, and sends numerous processes into its interior. (1) The Dura Mater, which is the membrane lying FIG. 11. View of the Cerebro-spinal Axis. (After Bourgery.) '/6- The rj g ht h lf of the cranium and trunk has been removed, and the roots of the spinal nerves dissected out and laid on their several vertebrae. F, T, O, cerebrum ; C, cerebellum ; P, pons Varolii ; in o, medulla oblongata ; m s, m s, upper and lower extremities of the spinal marrow. 01. to CVIII. are cervical nerves; 1)1. to DXIL, dorsal ; LI. to LV., lumbar : SI. to SV., sa- cral : Col., coceygeal. PROCESSES OF THE DURA MA 63 next to the wall of the bony cavity, is tough, white, fibrous, and of structure somewhat different in the cranial from the spinal cavity. In the former position it is identical with the inner periosteum of the bones of the skull ; on passing into the spinal column, how- ever, the periosteum divides into two or more lamellae, the inner- most of which is prolonged into the cylindrical tube that includes the spinal cord. Three processes of the dura mater divide only incompletely the cavity of the skull into two symmetrical halves and into an upper and lower space : (a) ike fate cerebri, a sickle- shaped process between the two hemispheres of the large brain ; FIG. 12. The Cranium opened to show the Falx Cerebri and Tentorium Cerebelli, and the Places of Exit for the Cranial Blood-vessels. ^. (Schwalbe.) a, a, Falx ; 6, 6, the tentorium ; 3, 3, Sinus transversus, and 2 to 3, Sinus rectus, receiving from in front the Vena magna Galena. 4, internal jugular vein ; 5, superficial temporal vein ; and 6, middle temporal vein. (b) ihefalx cerebelli, a similar process between the two lateral lobes of the cerebellum, or small brain ; and (c) the tentorium cerebelli, an arched process over the cerebellum separating it from the back portions of the large brain. The fluid necessary to fill up the gaps and smooth over the surfaces of the closed area made by the dura mater is contained in the intercommunicating spaces of the mem- brane lying next inward and called (2) Arachnoid ; this membrane is transparent and of delicate connective tissue. Toward the dura mater it presents a smooth, firm surface, like that of a serous mem- brane, and is covered by a layer of scaly endothelium ; this layer is reflected on to the roots of the spinal and cranial nerves, and becomes continuous with the lining of the dura mater when the 64 THE SPINAL CORD. nerves pierce the latter membrane. The space below this surface is called subarachnoid ; the subarachnoid or cerebro- spinal fluid (al- ready referred to as filling the intercommunicating compartments into which this space is divided by bundles of delicate areolar tis- sue) is alkaline and poor in albumen. (3) The Pia Mater is a vas- cular membrane, a minute network of fine branches of arteries and veins held together by delicate connective tissue. These rami- fications of the blood-vessels in the pia mater are on their way to or from the nervous substance of the spinal cord and brain. The membrane, therefore, closely invests this substance, being, how- ever, more intimately attached to the cord than to the brain. Un- like the arachnoid membrane, the pia mater dips into the fissures between the convolutions of the cerebrum. It also sends its pro- longations, not only into the fissures of the cord, but also, as slen- der bands (trabeculae) from its inner surface, into the columns of the cord. These trabeculse branch and anastomose within the white substance of the cord like the midrib of a leaf. The pia mater is well supplied with nerves. By these three membranes the nervous masses of the cerebro- spinal system are protected, held together and in place with a soft and yielding but sufficiently firm pressure, and nourished by the blood. This great nervous system, as a whole, consists of the cen- tral organs spinal cord and brain and of various roots, divisions, and branches of spinal and cranial, or encephalic nerves. 6. The Spinal Cord, or Medulla Spinalis, extends in the spinal canal from the aperture in the cranial cavity (foramen magnum), above which it is continuous with the medulla oblongata, down- ward to opposite the body of the first lumbar vertebra, where, after tapering off, it is spun out into a slender thread of gray nervous substance (filum terminate) that lies in the axis of the sacral canal. Its length is from fifteen to eighteen inches ; its weight, when di- vested of membranes and nerves, about an ounce and a half, or not far from one thirty-third of that of the brain. It is nearly cylin- drical in shape, its front and back surfaces being somewhat flat- tened ; it has two considerable enlargements of its girth an up- per (cervical), from which arise the nerves that supply the upper limbs ; and a lower (lumbar), which supplies the lower limbs with nerves. 7. The external structure of the spinal cord requires us to no- tice (1) the Fissures which almost completely divide it for Its whole length into right and left (lateral) halves, and are, therefore, fitly called " median ; " of these fissures (a) the one in front (anterior median) is somewhat broader than (6) the one behind (posterior B 40- FlG. 13. A. Anterior, and B, Posterior. View of the Spinal Cord and Medulla Oblongata. B', the Filum terminale, whioh has been cut off from A and B. 1, Pyramids of the medulla, and 1', their decussation. 2, olives ; 3, lateral strands of the medulla ; 4', cala- mus scriptorius ; 5, the funiculus gracilis ; and 6, the ftmiculus cuneatus ; 7. the anterior, and 9, the posterior, fissures ; 8, the antero-lateral impression ; 10, postero-lateral groove. C, the cervical, and L, the lumbar, enlargements of the cord. 10 -I THE SPINAL COED. A median). Both are filled to their bottom with processes of the pia mater ; and the sides of the posterior fissure are bound closely to- gether by the same membrane. Each of these symmetrical and nearly half-cylindrical halves of the cord is subdivided by the lines of the entrance of the posterior and anterior nerve-roots into (2) three Columns : (a) the anterior, which lies between the anterior median fissure and the anterior roots ; (b) the posterior, which lies between the posterior median fissure and the posterior roots ; and (c) the lateral column, which lies at the side of the cord between the other two columns. (3) The Commissures of the spinal cord are two bands of ner- vous matter which unite its halves, thus prevent- ing it from being com- pletely separated into two portions by the fissures. The one in front, at the bottom of the anterior median fissure, is composed of transverse nerve-fibres and is called (a) the anterior white commis- sure ; the one behind, at the bottom of the posterior fissure, is (b) the posterior gray com- missure. The gray commissure is nearly Fio.14.-A, Anterior, and B, Lateral, View of a Portion of the twice as lar g e a S the Cord from the Cervical Region. 2 /i- (Schwalbe.) 1, Anterior w >,itp PTPpnt nt tViP median, and 2, posterior median, fissures. At 3 is the an- wmte > except at tne tero-lateral impression, over which spread the anterior roots nprviPftl and Inmhnr Pn- (5). The posterior roots (6), with their ganglion (6/), arise C from the postero-lateral groove, and uniting with the ante- largements of the COl'd rior roots form the compound nerve (7). where the white is larger. 1 Along its whole length the gray commissure incloses a circular or elliptical canal (central canal), whose diameter is about one-twenty-fifth of an inch and which is lined by ciliated cells. Near the central canal lies a thin layer of gelatinous substance. The rest of the gray commissure consists for the most part of extremely fine nerve-fibres devoid of medullary sheath; while the white com- missure is composed of medullated fibres. The thickness of the 1 See Henle, Anatomie des Menschen. Text, p. 309. CRESCENT SHAPE OF THE HORNS. 67 commissures is, as a rule, proportional to the size of the corre- sponding nerve-roots ; their form, as they pass into the lateral parts of the cord, varies in different sections of its length. 8. Transverse sections of the spinal cord show us that, as its external appearance would indicate, the substance of which it is composed is arranged in two symmetrical halves, almost, but not quite separated by the median fissures. This substance, like that of all the nervous centres, consists of both white and gray nervous matter. The former is external and composes the columns of the cord ; while the latter is internal and is surrounded by the white. The relative amount of the two kinds of nervous matter varies in the different parts of the cord. At its beginning from the filum termi- nate scarcely any white matter appears ; the amount of such matter, however, increases from below upward, and is largest in the cervi- cal part of the cord. The amount of gray matter is greatest in the upper and lower enlargements of the cord. The gray columns on either side of the cord, together with th,e commissures which unite them, form a figure somewhat like a large Roman X, with diverging sides; but the lateral masses of these crescent-shaped bodies are narrower in the thoracic (or dorsal) region, and broader in the cervical and lumbar en- largements. Sometimes the figure is rather like that of a large %, or a pair of butterflies' wings. The two limbs of each side of the figure into which the gray columns are thus formed are called (4) Horns ; (a) the anterior horn is round- ed, (b) the posterior long and narrow. The division into an- terior, posterior, and lateral columns, which is well marked on the external surface of the spinal cord, is gradually lost as we pass inward toward the central gray substance. Of the two horns of each side, the anterior has the appearance of " spongy sub- stance," the posterior of a kernel of such substance surrounded by gelatinous substance. 9. Careful study of the spinal cord with the higher powers of the microscope has enabled histologists to describe with further FIG. 15. Transverse Section through the Spinal Cord. AF, antero-median, and PF, postero-median fissures ; PC, posterior, LC, lateral, and AC, anteri- or columns ; AR, anterior, and PR, posterior nerve- roots ; C, central canal of cord, with its columnar endothclial lining. The pia mater is shown invest- ing the cord, sending processes into the anterior and posterior fissures, as well as delicate prolonga- tions into the columns. The crescentic arrange- ment of the gray matter is shown by the darker shaded portion. THE SPINAL CORD. Ti details the manner in which the nervous elements, both fibrillar and granular, are arranged within the connective substance. The White Substance of the spinal cord, besides connective tis- sue and lymph- and blood- vessels, is composed of nerve-fibres of compara- tively large or of medium size. The essential constit- uent of these fibres is the axis-cylinder, the diameter of which is generally one- third or one-fourth of their breadth. When fully de- veloped, they are rarely or never without a medullary sheath, but probably have no neurilemma. Their di- ameter is not constant ; the thickest fibres ( rsVo ^ 2 oVo f an inch) are found in the outer portions of the anterior columns, where their size is tolerably uni- form. In the lateral col- umns the nerve-fibres vary greatly in size, the finer ones lying inward near the gray matter. In the posterior columns they increase in thickness as they approach the posterior gray com- missure. In the upper thoracic, and through the whole of the cer- vical, region, there is found a wedge-shaped bundle of fine fibres that is separated off from the posterior columns toward the middle line of the cord by a strong septum ; this is called fasciculus gracilis, or " column of Goll." The direction of some of the nerve-fibres in the white substance of the cord is vertical, of others, horizontal, of still others, oblique. The vertical fibres are most abundant, are united with a parallel arrangement into fascicles of various sizes, and ascend toward the brain. Horizontal fibres in the white substance of the spinal cord are of two kinds commissural fibres and fibres of the roots. The fibres of the white commissure run horizontally along the median border of the gray matter of the horns, and become interwoven with the vertical bundles of the anterior columns. Most of them pass from the substance of the anterior horn of one side across to the FIG. 16. Section of Dorsal Part of the Spinal Cord show- ing the Gray Matter of the Horns. ao /j. (Henle.) Ca, anterior white, and Cg, gray commissure ; Co, cen- tral canal ; v, vesicular column ; s. spongy substance of the posterior horn, surrounded by g, gelatinous sub- stance; Pr, reticular process; Ti, intermedian lateral tract. COURSE OF FIBRES IN THE COED. 69 anterior column of the other side. The fibres of the posterior spi- nal roots run in a nearly horizontal direction inward ; they divide into anastomosing bundles so minute and so intricately interwoven with the vertical fibres of the posterior column that their course is difficult to trace. Part of them (the lateral ones) run directly into the subslantia gelatinosa of the posterior horns, and are, per- haps, continuous with the axis-cylinder processes of the nerve-cells of its spongy kernel ; part of them appear to enter the gray sub- stance of these horns only after curving and running a variable dis- FIG. 17. Section of the Spinal Cord at the Level of the Eighth Pair of Dorsal Nerves. 8/ p (Schematic, from Schwalbe.) $.., anterior fissure; s.p., posterior septum (or fissure); c.a., anterior, and c.p., posterior, commissures ; c.c., central canal ; co.a, anterior horn ; co.l., lateral horn ; CO.JD., posterior horn ; #, anterior lateral, and &, anterior median cells ; e, cells of the lateral horn ; d, columns of Clai-ke ; e, solitary cells of the posterior horn ; r.a., the anterior, and r.p., the posterior, roots ; f, bundle of fibres of the posterior horn ; and /', bundle of the posterior column ; _/", longitudinal fibres of the posterior horn ; s.g.R., gelatinous substance of Rolando; /.., anterior,/.;., lateral, and/.p., posterior, columns. tance upward, or perhaps downward, in the posterior columns. The fibres of the anterior roots of the spinal cord traverse its white substance obliquely ; some of them enter the gray matter of the anterior horns on the same side, where they probably become con- tinuous with the axis-cylinder processes of its large ganglion-cells ; others of them pass through the anterior commissure to the other side of the cord ; still others pass into the lateral columns and the posterior horns. The Gray Substance of the spinal cord, in addition to the same constituents as those of the white substance, has numerous nerve- 70 THE SPINAL CORD. cells. Its nerve-fibres, which form the chief part of its mass, and are generally non-medullated, differ from those of the white sub- stance in that they frequently subdivide and thus become attenu- ated into extremely minute plexuses. The ganglion-cells of the spinal cord are multipolar, and give off two kinds of processes ; one an unbranched axis-cylinder process and the others branching pro- cesses, both being of a fibrillated character (comp. Chap. I, 28 and 29). The unbranched processes of the ganglion-cells of the anterior horns are probably continuous with the axis-cylinders of the nerve -fibres of the anterior spinal roots. Of most of the simi- lar processes from cells in the posterior horns we cannot yet make the same affirmation. The branching processes of the nerve-cells were traced by Gerlach * until he thought himself able to affirm that their finest ramifications participate in those plexuses of nerve- fibres which he regards as an essential constituent of the gray sub- stance of the cord. Henle 2 and others consider the fate of these processes to be still unknown. Characteristic groups of ganglion-cells occur at various places in the sections of the gray matter of the spinal cord. In the anterior horns of the cervical and lumbar regions are three groups of large cells ; one of these is on the side of the horn (lateral), one farther to the front, one on its median border. They all coalesce in the anterior horns of the thoracic region. In the anterior horns also occur isolated nerve-cells of different sizes. The middle part of the gray lateral halves of the spinal cord contains, in parts of the cervical and thoracic regions, isolated groups of cells ; one impor- tant group is situated at the inner angle of the base of the posterior horn, and is called the " columns of Clarke." The other nerve-cells of the posterior horns are small, and are not collected into groups, but are distributed through that part of the substance of the horns which is also traversed by the above-mentioned fine plexuses of nerve-fibres (see Fig. 17). 10. By careful counting, E. A. Birge 8 ascertained the number of the elements in the spinal cords of several frogs. From his con- clusions something may perhaps be gained toward forming a better conception of this organ. In seven cases Birge found that the num- ber of fibres in the anterior roots varied from 5,984 in the smallest animal to 11,468 in the largest ; the number increasing at the rate of about one thousand four hundred and fifty motor fibres to each added ounce of weight (51.5 to the gram). The diameter of the fibres was 1 See in Strieker's Human and Comparative Histology, ii., pp. 352 ff. 2 Anat. des Menschen. Text, pp. 310 ff. 8 Archiv f. Anat. u. Phvsiol, 1882, Physiolog. Abth., pp. 435-479. NERVE-TRACTS IN THE CORD. 71 also found to be much enlarged, according to the size and weight of the animal ; t and the average diameter widely different in the different nerve-roots. For example, it varied from 3,550 fibres, in the sev- enth pair of nerves, to 14,133 in the tenth pair, for a cross-sec- tion one twenty-fifth of an inch square. So, too, were the so- called motor-cells of the anterior gray columns found to vary from 4,871 to 11,517, according to the weight of the animal. It was found that the large masses of cells lie in two principal groups, corresponding to the cervical and lumbar enlargements of the cord. 11. It would be of great interest to our inquiries if it were possible to give a complete description of the tracts of the nerve- fibres in their passage along the spinal cord ; but it is impossible for the microscope to unravel them, and the evidence of physiology is (as we shall see subsequently), somewhat doubtful and even con- flicting. Of late, however, certain of these paths have been traced with considerable certainty by combining the methods of embry- ological and pathological observation. In the development of the spinal cord, the medullary substance of the nerve-fibres along cer- tain tracts of the white columns is formed later, so as to render them distinguishable in cross-sections. Moreover, when the nerve- fibres are separated from their place of origin, degeneration of their elements takes place. The place of the degenerated nervous sub- stance is taken by connective tissue, which behaves differently un- der the influence of staining fluids. By following the course of this degeneration toward their periphery, the paths of conduction in the nerves may be traced. Some time ago, Tiirck * attempted to mark out certain motor tracts in the brain by using this process of degeneration as his guide. Our great authority at present on the paths of the nerve-fibres in the spinal cord and brain, as ascer- tained chiefly by the former of these methods, is the work of Flechsig. 2 Two tracts in the antero-lateral columns, which extend along the greater part of the spinal cord and into certain parts of the brain, are thus quite certainly made out. From their upper connections they have been named the pyramidal tract (or tracts) and the direct lateral cerebellar tract. The former is directly traceable down from the anterior pyramid of the medulla oblongata. Most of the fibres of this tract cross over in the extreme upper part of the cord, and pass down it in the back part of the lateral column as a compact 1 Sitzgsb. d. Kaiserl. Acad., vi., pp. 303 ff. 2 Die Leitungsbalinen im Gehirn u. Ruckenmark d. Menschen. Leipzig, 1876. THE SPINAL CORD. bundle. This crossed (or lateral) part of the pyramidal tract can be traced as far as the third or fourth pair of the sacral nerves. But some of the fibres from the pyramids of the medulla do not cross in the upper part of the cord. These form the uncrossed (or anterior) part of the pyramidal tract ; this part gradually dimin- ishes as it passes downward, and ceases in the dorsal region of the cord. The direct lateral cerebellar tract lies between the late- ral pyramidal tract and the outer surface of the cord. It disappears in the lumbar re- gion. It is thought that the rest of the ante- rior column of the cord, besides the anterior pyramidal tract, may be, for the most part, commissural in nature that is, it serves to bind together the two halves of the cord on the same level, or somewhat obliquely those lying slightly below or slightly above. In the posterior white column a tract can be traced as far downward as the middle of the dorsal region of the cord ; this is the one already referred to as the " tract (or column) of Goll." 12. The spinal cord is, therefore, shown to be a mechanism composed by combining the nervous elements so as to serve the great purpose of conducting nerve-commo- tion and acting as a series of reflex and auto- matic centres. In it we find tracts of con- nected nervous elements for the movement of ascending and descending nervous im- pulses. It is also a column or pile of ner- vous centres, each one of which may have a particular value for particular functions ; but which are also all bound together, up and down, right and left, and obliquely, so as to act unitedly under a certain control from each other and from the central organs lying above. It is especially strong in nerve- cells, just where it needs to be so namely, at the enlargements, where it sends off nerves to the upper and lower limbs. Its paths for the passage and diffusion of molecular disturbance are indefi- nitely numerous, and their intricacy extremely great. It has groups FIG. 18. Sections through the Spinal Cord at different ele- vations, to show the tracts of White Substance. /., eleva- tion of the sixth cervical nerres. //., of the third; ///., of the sixth ; and TV., of the twelfth, dorsal nerves; and V., of the fourth lumbar nerves ; pv, uncrossed (or anterior) pyramidal tract; jo, crossed (or lateral) pyra- midal tract ; *, direct late- ral cerebellar tract ; fir, tract of Goll. ELEMENTS OF THE INTEECEANIAL OEGANS. 73 of nerve-elements, such as belong to the central organs generally, of ganglion-cells embedded in neuroglia ; it has special local mech- anisms within, and yet connected with its general mechanism. It is adapted to do a large amount and variety of work through its pairs of nerves, without calling upon the higher nervous centres ; it is constructed so as to act like a system of relays, not only trans- mitting, but also modifying, inhibiting, enhancing, and distributing the impulses which it receives, both from the more central and from the peripheral portions of the cerebro-spinal system. 13. The same elements of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells, in con- junction with connective tissue and neuroglia, and enveloped in the three inclosing membranes (dura mater, arachnoid, and pia mater) already described, are combined with an increased variety and com- plexity of arrangement to form those intercranial central organs with which the upper end of the spinal cord is continuous. Here, too, these elements are gathered into fascicles of nerve-fibres which converge, or diverge, and run their courses in various direc- tions, and into ganglionic masses, in which, besides the nerve-fibres, nerve-cells and diffused finely granular substance of a doubtful physiological character are found. Uniformity of elementary parts, together with the greatest intricacy of arrangement, prevails, above all other regions of the body, in the structure of the brain. The significance of the elements and elementary parts can, therefore, only be understood when they are considered in the localities and relations to other parts which are assigned them by this so intricate arrangement. 14. The Encephalon, or Brain, in the most extended sense of the word, includes all that portion of the central nervous axis which is contained within the cavity of the skull. This grand mass of nervous matter may be divided into several parts, somewhat differ- ently marked off according to the point of view from which the division proceeds. The division proposed by Meynert ' to which reference will be made later is based upon the supposed physio- logical significance of the different parts, and upon their arrange- ment so as to discharge the functions of conduction and " suscep- tibility to impressions." For, as this authority rightly claims, " a purely histological description " is of comparatively little service in comprehending the meaning of the architecture of the brain. We shall, first of all, however, describe briefly the contents of the cranial cavity, as it appears both to the unaided eye and under the microscope, without reference to theory. 1 In Strieker, Human and Comparative Histology, ii. , pp. 367 ff. 74 STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. On removing the entire brain from the skull, the following four divisions of its mass engage the attention of even the inexperienced observer. Immediately above the section by which it has been sepa- rated from the spinal cord, and appearing as an enlarged prolonga- tion of the cord, is (I.) the Medulla Oblongata. Covering the upper back part of this organ, and extending beyond it on both sides, with its surface divided into small lobes by furrows, is (II.) the Cerebellum, or little or hinder brain. Swelling out in front of and above the medulla is (IH.) the Pons Varolii, or so-called "bridge" of the brain. While in two hemispheres separated by a deep fis- sure, above both pons and cerebellum, and filling the larger part of the cranial cavity, is seen (IV.) the Cerebrum, or large brain, or Cbl ^^ Mo Fio. 19. View of the Brain in Profile. %. (Henle.) (76, cerebrum; (757, cerebellum ; J/b, me- dulla oblongata ; / J , pons Varolii, brain proper. These divisions are all readily distinguishable on the external surfaces of the Encephalon. On laying the encephalic mass open, however, certain bodies of nervous matter are disclosed that have been concealed beneath the cerebellum and the cerebrum, and that^-although ordinarily re- garded as parts of the latter are scarcely to be included in any one of the four main divisions of the brain. We shall describe in order the organs just named. 15. I. The Medulla Oblongata is somewhat pyramidal in form, about one and one-fourth inch in length, from three-fourths to one inch broad in its widest part, and one-half inch thick ; it extends from the spinal aperture of the cranial cavity (foramen magnum) to the lower border of the pons Varolii. It is continuous with the spinal cord, and somewhat resembles it in the divisions of its ex- ternal surface. Its anterior pyramids appear superficially continu- EXTEENAL ASPECT OF THE MEDULLA. ous with the anterior columns of the cord ; its lateral area shows upon its upper end an oval-shaped elevation called the " olivary body ; " its posterior tracts also appear continuous with the poste- rior columns of the cord. Just outside the upper portion of each posterior tract, and behind the olive, ascends to the cerebellum a strong tract named Cq the "restiform body." That portion of the posterior column of the upper cord (al- ready referred to, p. 68) which is marked off from the rest by a septum of pia mater, is continued up into the medulla oblonga- ta, and becomes more strongly marked. It is known as the fu- niculus gracilis ; and when traced still far- ther upward is seen to broaden out into an expansion called the clava. A prolongation of the posterior lateral column also gradually expands as it ascends, so that it acquires a "wedge-shape" form, and is accordingly known as the cuneate funiculus. The medulla oblongata, like the spinal cord^ is composed of white and gray nervous matter ; it differs from the cord, however, in hav- ing its gray matter not 'confined to the central part, but gath- ered more into special masses or nuclei. A redistribution of the nerve-elements takes place in the medulla, and their arrangement becomes more complex. An important part of this redistribution is accomplished by the divergence of the posterior tracts and resti- form bodies, which opens up tfre central gray mass, and lets it come to the surface between the sides' of the surrounding white matter. Looking at this redistribution as it appears from below, the elements of the cord may be said to be spread out and increased by the addition of new elements ; looking at it as it appears from above, the two great nerve-tracts of the cerebrum (tegmentum and crusta of the crus cerebri), and the tract of the cerebellum, may be FIG. 20. Back View of the Medulla Oblongata, the Cerebellum being removed. (Henle.) Cq. corpus quadrigeminum ; Lc, locus cceruleus ; F, flocculus of the cerebellum ; Ac, ala ci- nerea ; and Ac' Stilling's nucleus accessorius ; 01, clava ; Fc, funiculus cuneatus ; Fg, funiculus gracilis. 76 STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. said to be gathered up in the medulla, and compressed so as to form in the cord a continuous and symmetrical medullary invest- ment for its central gray matter. The intimate structure of this organ is exceedingly complicated ; much of it is doubtful, and as yet impossible to make out satis- factorily. The two important considerations are (1) to trace the nerve-fibres as they ascend through the medulla from the various columns of the cord, and (2) to locate the particular collections of gray matter, whether as continuous with those of the cord or as consisting of independent masses. The various tracts of White Matter in the medulla oblongata, although they superficially appear to be prolongations of the col- KT - cc C.a. FIG. 21. Section showing the Decussation of the Pyramids at the point where the Spinal Cord passes into the Medulla Oblongata. %. (Schwalbe.) f.l.a., longitudinal anterior fissure, through which the bundles of pyramidal fibres (py, py'), are crossing over at d ; V, anterior, and S. lateral pyramids; <7.a., anterior horn with groups of ganglion-cells, a and b ; cc. cen- tral canal; f.r., formatio reticularis; ce, the neck, and ff, the head, of the posterior horn; M.C., nucleus of the funiculus cuneatus ; and n.gr., of the funiculus gracilis ; II 1 , funiculus gra- cilis ; H *, funiculus cuneatus ; x, group of ganglion cells. umns of the spinal cord, are really so to a small extent only. This fact is most clearly made obvious by a comparison of successive transverse sections. A large bundle of fibres, which in the cord lies in the posterior part of the lateral column (see p. 71 f.), pushes its way obliquely through the gray matter of the anterior horn, and passes in front of the central canal to the pyramid of the opposite side. The crossing of this bundle, as seen in the anterior median DECUSSATION OF THE PYKAMIDS. 77 fissure at the lower part of the medulla, is called the " decussation of the pyramids." The abrupt passage of so many fibres through it breaks up the anterior horn, separates part of it from the rest, and pushes this separated part over to one side, so that it comes to lie close to a part of the posterior horn. The latter also becomes gradu- ally shifted sidewise by an increase in the size of the posterior tracts, so that it comes to lie almost at right angles to the posterior median fissure ; its head enlarges and approaches close to the sur- face, where it forms a projection (funiculas of Rolando), and, higher up, a distinct swelling (tubercle of Rolando}. Tracing the princi- pal bundles of fibres on their course from the columns of the spinal cord upward through the medulla oblongata, we find (in accordance with what has already been said) that the posterior column forms the substance of the three posterior fuuiculi of the medulla namely, gracilis, cuneatus, and funiculus of Rolando : a considerable part of the lateral column (the lateral pyramidal tract, see p. 72) passes into the opposite pyramid of the medulla, and ascends in it toward the cerebrum in company with a small part of the anterior column of the same side ; while another part of the lateral column (the direct lateral cerebellar tract) passes at about the middle of the medulla obliquely backward to the restiform body, and the rest of it dips under the olives, and is continued toward the corpora quad- rigeminum and optic thalamus. Most of the anterior column dips under the pyramid, and passes upward toward the cerebrum, but part is continued into the pyramid of the same side. Curved fibres may also be seen running their course in the plane of the different transverse sections some superficial, some deep (arciform or arcuate fibres). As the medulla is a bilateral organ, its halves are bound together by commissural fibres, which run obliquely and decussate in the mesial plane, forming a well-marked band called raph'e. In addi- tion to the fibres of the medulla oblongata which are continuous with those of the spinal cord, others originate within the organ itself. It is a centre of origin for several pairs of encephalic nerves. The Gray Matter of the medulla oblongata is, in part, continu- ous with that of the cord, and in part consists of independent masses. The former part is, as we have seen, broken up and rearranged by the decussation of the pyramids. The fate of the posterior horns and of the central gray substance has already been described. The substance of the anterior horns becomes divided into many little masses by the nerve-fibres that traverse it, so as to form a coarse network of nervous matter (formatio reticularis) containing nerve- 78 STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. cells, and intersected by bundles of fibres. In the upper part of the organ its interior gray matter appears upon the floor of the fourth ventricle, into which the central canal dilates. Four special kernels or nuclei, of gelatinous / '"' ** n.c. appearance and containing few n.c. multipolar nerve-cells, are to be noted in each half of the me- dulla. These are (1) the nucle- us arciformis, which is situated just beneath the pia mater, at the front of the anterior pyra- mid ; (2) the nucleus olivaris, or dentate body (corpus dentatum), which is within the inferior olive, a mass of gray matter folded in a zigzag or denticu- lated manner, forming a sort of capsule through the openings of which closely packed masses FIG. 22. Section showing Gray Matter of the of fibres run into the SUri'OUnd- Medulla Oblongata, in the region of the upper . / o\ J.T crossing of the Pyramids. /i- (Schwalbe.) ing Space | (6) 1116 nucleus Oll- il varis accessorius, a smaller gray mass lying on the outside of the dentate body ; and (4) the 8oryolivary~nucleus; F.r. /formatio reticularis ; nudeUS pyramidallS (sometimes fir, substantia gelatmosa; /.a., /.a. 1 , /.a. 2 , arci- ry form fibres. also called " inner accessory nu- cleus " of the olive), lying on the inside of the same body. Another kind of collections of gray matter in the medulla consists of those groups of multipolar cells to which the nerves that have here their so-called roots of origin can be traced. These cells resemble those of the gray columns of the cord the larger ones apparently being connected with the roots of the motor nerves, the smaller with those of the sensory. It may be assumed that some of their pro- cesses are continuous with the axis-cylinders of the fibres of the nerve-roots, and that others serve to place the medulla in direct connection with the cerebrum ; positive demonstration of these as- sumptions, however, requires further histological researches. The nerve-nuclei in the medulla receive their name from the nerves whose fibres originate in them. 16. II. In the Cerebellum, or Little Brain, the general arrange- ment of the two kinds of nervous matter is the reverse of that of the spinal cord and the medulla oblongata : the gray matter is external, the white internal. More precisely, the cerebellum is mid in which is n.ar, the nucleus arcifornris; o, beginning of the olivary nucleus : o' acce^ PEDUNCLES OF THE CEREBELLUM. 79 a white or medullary mass rising out of three large bundles or stalks of nerve-fibres on each side, and enveloped with a covering of gray nervous matter. Like the other organs of the cerebro- spinal system, it is a bilateral structure. These stalks of nerves connect the cerebellum with three other organs, with parts of which they are continuous. Considered as connections, they are called the " peduncles " or crura of the cerebellum. Of the three peduncles, (1) one (inferior peduncle) on each half of the organ is identical with the restiform fascicle which ascends from the me- dulla to the cerebellum ; (2) another (superior peduncle), similar to the first in size, passes forward over the anterior end of the fourth ventricle, and connects the cerebellum with the tegmentum of the crus ; (3) a third (middle peduncle) passes down on each side into the pons. This middle peduncle forms the larger portion of the white core of the organ. In addition to the fibres from these three sets of peduncles, this core is in part constituted by others which arise in the cerebellum itself ; some of the latter connect together the different regions of the organ lying above or below each other, some unite the opposite and symmetrical regions of its hemi- spheres. The interior relations of the fibres from the three peduncles are, on account of the extreme intricacy of their course, not yet fully made out. United in the white core of the cerebellum, they form a rather uniform mass, which is interrupted, however, by certain nuclei of a gelatinous appearance. Within either hemisphere, and to be disclosed by cutting through it a little to the outer side of the median lobe, is a mass of nervous matter arranged like the den- tate body of the medulla oblongata ; it is the corpus dentatum of the cerebellum. Other smaller, round, or oblate masses of gray matter are found toward the middle of the core from the dentate body. The arrangement of the gray matter which forms the rind or cortex of the cerebellum is somewhat peculiar ; its characteristics are best seen by examining a cross-section. It is thus found that this cortical gray substance is arranged in thin plates, or lamellae, which are penetrated by prolongations of the white matter of the core ; these prolongations branch off into the interior of the lamel- lae, and give to the cortex the arborescent appearance known by the name of " arbor vitce." The primary branches of this tree-like prolongation of the white matter of the core within the gray mat- ter of the cortex stand either perpendicular or a little inclined to the surface of the core. The smaller branches run from one side to another transversely or forward in concave curves. 80 STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. The external surface of the cerebellum presents two hemispheres, or lateral lobes, united by a central lobe called the vermiform pro- cess. This central lobe on its upper (or tentorial) surface is a mere elevation, but the " vermiform " character of its lower (or occipital) surface is well defined. The process here lies at the bottom of a deep fossa (vallecula). From the middle peduncle of each hemi- sphere a large horizontal fissure extends backward along its outer border, and divides the hemisphere into its tentorial and occipital FIG. 23 Lower Surface of Cerebellum. %. (After Sappey.) 1, inferior vermiform process; 2, 2, vallecula : 5, flocculus; 6, pons Varolii ; 8. middle peduncle of the Cerebellum : 9, medulla oblongata. Various pairs of nerves are seen thus : 12 and 13, roots of fifth pair ; 14, sixth pair; 15, facial nerve; 17, auditory; 18, glosso-pharyngeal ; 19, pneurno-gastric ; 20, spinal accessory ; 21, hypoglossal. surfaces. Each of these surfaces is divided by fissures into smaller lobes or lobules. In the gray matter of the cortex of the cerebellum three distinct layers of nervous substance may be distinguished. Of these the pure gray layer is the most external ; it is sometimes called the " molecular layer." It consists of an extremely delicate framework of connective tissue, in which, together with nuclei of the connec- tive tissue, a few roundish cells and minute fibres of nervous struct- ure appear. The middle layer is cellular and composed of a single irregular row of large ganglion-cells, called " cells or corpuscles of Purkinje." Comparatively large processes from these cells branch into and ramify within the outer layer. According to most observers (Kolliker, Deiters, and others) each of the cells sends a single me- dullated and unbranched process inward, which becomes continu- ous with the axis-cylinder of a fibre of the medullary portion of this organ ; but according to Stilling there are several branches from each, which divide to form a network in the internal layer. This THE PONS VAROLII. 81 layer is rust-colored and merges gradually into the white substance of the core ; it appears to contain multitudes of granules, with a well-defined nucleus surrounded by branching protoplasm. The nature of the granules is not known ; they have been considered by some as elements of sustentacular tissue, by others as lymph- corpuscles, by others as multipolar nerve-corpuscles. The cerebellum is thus constituted by a complex arrangement of the nervous elements as a kind of side mechanism of the nervous system, lying out of the course of its direct tracts and yet bound by nervous cords (the peduncles) in all directions to the other organs of the brain. 17. III. The Pons Varolii, or Bridge of the Brain, has its princi- pal office in the mechanism of the central organs of the cranial cavity as a meeting- and switching-place of nerve-tracts between other organs ; but it is also itself a central organ, as well as a cen- tre of origin for certain nerve-fibres. The pons is really a thicken- FIG. 24. Median Section through the Stem of the "Brain. (After Reichert.) M, medulla oblon- gata ; of whichPa are the pyramid?, decussating &tpd ; c, central canal ; pp, restiform body ; Pv, pons Varolii ; F4, fourth ventricle, av, arbor vitse of the cerebellum J p, pyramid ; , uvula ; n, nodule ; as, aqueduct of Sylvius ; Cr, crus cerebri ; Q, corpora quadrigemina ; P, pineal gland ; 7%, optic thalamus. Commissures ; ca, the anterior ; cm, the mollis ; and cp, the posterior. F3, the third ventricle ; A, corpus albicans ; to, tuber cinereum ; i, infundibulum. ing of the ventral wall of the fourth ventricle, composed of the mid- dle peduncles of the cerebellum encircling and partly blending with the continuation upward of the medulla oblongata. Its superficial fibres on the ventral surface are transverse in their general direc- tion ; but the middle fibres pass directly across, the lower ascend slightly, and the superior are more curved, and descend obliquely 6 82 STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. to reach the crus cerebelli. On removing these superficial fibres the prolonged fibres of the anterior pyramids are exposed to view. These, as they ascend through the pons, are intersected by the transverse fibres. At the lower part of the organ, behind the fibres from the anterior pyramids, a special set of transverse fibres (tra- pezium) begins at a collection of gray matter (superior olivary nucleus) on one side, and crosses the middle line to ascend to the cerebellum on the other side. Nuclei of gray matter with small multipolar nerve-cells are found everywhere between the fibres of the ventral part of the pons. Many of its transverse fibres are probably connected with these cells. The posterior portion of this organ is chiefly constituted by a continuation upward of the formatio reticularis, and of the gray matter of the medulla oblongata. In the reticular formation two or three important collections of nerve-cells lie embedded. One of these is the " superior olivary nucleus," which lies behind the outer part of the trapezium and gives origin to some of its nerve- fibres. Of the other nuclei in this region, one gives origin to the seventh or facial nerve, and others to portions of the fifth nerve. 18. IV. The Cerebrum, or Large Brain, much exceeds in size all the other contents of the cranial cavity ; but it surpasses them more especially in the variety and complexity of the arrangement here given to the nervous elements ; while its significance for the in- quiries of Physiological Psychology is altogether unique. As ordinarily described, this nervous mass includes a consider- able number of organs, which vary in structure, relations, and physiological functions. Besides the hemispheres of the cerebrum, and the great ganglia (corpora striata and optic thalami) which lie at their base, custom includes in this term certain bodies that ap- pear connected with the lower surface of the mass, viz., the corpora quadrigemina, pineal gland, crura cerebri, etc. 19. The Cerebrum is of ovoid shape and is divided above, in front, and behind into two hemispheres by a deep median longi- tudinal fissure. If these hemispheres are drawn asunder by open- ing this fissure, they are seen to be connected at its bottom by a broad white band of nervous matter, the corpus callosum. The outer surface of each hemisphere is convex and fitted to the con- cave inner side of the bones of the skull ; the inner surface along the median fissure is flat, and separated from the corresponding surface of the other hemisphere by a process of the dura mater (fc&c cerebri) ; its under surface is separated from the cerebellum and the pons by another process of the same membrane (tentoriuni). From the front of the pons the large white nervous cords, called BASAL ASPECT OF THE CEREBRUM. 83 cerebral peduncles, or crura cerebri, pass upward and forward to connect the cerebrum with the organs lying below it. Around each crus winds a flat band, the optic tract ; these tracts come to- gether in front to form the optic commissure from which the two optic nerves arise. The lozenge-shaped space enclosed by the crura cerebri, the optic tracts, and optic commissure, contains a Let Pec Tbo Cha Tc Spa In 'Mo FIG. 25. Under Aspect of the Brain. (Henle.) B, basis of the crura cerebri ; Oca, corpora al- bicantia; I 1 , olfactory bulb; II 1 , optic tract; Tc, tuber cinereum ; Lpp, posterior perforated space ; Ccl, corpus callosum ; Let, lamina cinerea terminalis ; Spa, anterior perforated space ; T, tegrmentum ; Tho, thalamus opticus ; P, pons ; Mo, medulla oblongata ; I. to VIII., first to eighth pair of cranial nerves. gray layer (posterior perforated space), two small white bodies (cor- pora albicantia), and a gray nodule (tuber cinereum) which is joined to a small reddish-gray oval mass (pituitary body) by a conical Jjro- cess of gray matter (infundibulum). In front of the optic commis- sure is a thin layer of gray substance (lamina cinerea) ; and on each side of .the deep longitudinal fissure stretches the olfactory tract, 84 STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. with its bulb. The intercranial part of this "nerve " is now known really to be a projecting portion of the brain. All these structures, together with the cut ends of the several pairs of cranial nerves, ma} r be seen upon the under surface of the cerebrum. 20. The upper surface of the cerebral hemispheres presents the appearance of gray nervous matter arranged in folds which are called " convolutions " or gyri. These convolutions are separated by " fissures " or sulci of varying depth, some of which are so constant and strongly marked that their presence is employed to divide the surface of the hemispheres into lobes, while others, less strongly marked, separate from each other the convolutions of the same lobe. It is the arrangement of the convolutions, with their sep- arating fissures, which gives the hemispheres of the brain their characteristic appearance, and which fits them for their unique functions in the economy of the nervous mechanism. FIG. 26. To show the Right Ventricle and the Left Half of the Corpus Callosum. a, transverse fibres, and 6, longitudinal fibres of corpus callosum ; c, anterior, and d, posterior cornua of lat- eral ventricle ; e, septum lucidum ; /, corpus striatum ; j7, taenia semicircularis ; A, optic thala- mus ; *, choroid plexus ; J, taenia hippocampi ; m, hippocampus major ; , hippocampus minor ; o, eminentia collateral! s. 21. By cutting off successive slices from the upper part of the hemispheres their general internal structure may be seen. It re- VENTRICLES OF THE CEREBRUM. 85 sembles the plan upon which the cerebellum is constructed. A core of white nervous matter is surrounded by a shell or cortex of gray ;'the two lateral halves of the core are bound together by a strong band of fibres, usually described as commissural (corpus callosum), which is itself overlapped by one of the most marked convolutions of the brain (gyrus fornicatus). By cut- ting still deeper it is found that the cor- pus callosum forms the roof of a space in the interior of each hemisphere (the late- ral ventricles). These two cavities or ven- tricles are moistened by a serous fluid and separated by a thin transparent wall (sep- tum lucidum). The roof of another cav- ity, the third ventri- cle, is formed by an expanded fold of the pia mater (velum in* terpoftitum), the mar- gins of which are fringed by the so- ,, T .. , ., , FIG. 27. Basal Ganglia of the Cerebrum seen from above. (Henle.) Called CtlOrOld pleX- Ccl, genu of the corpus callosum ; Cs, corpus striatum ; Vel, ventricle of the septum lucidum ; Of, column of the fornix ; St, stria termmalis ; Tho, optic thalamus ; and Ts, its anterior tu- bercle ; Com, middle commissure between the thalami and over the third ventricle ; Pv, pulvinar ; Cn, conarium or pineal arteries Which SUp- gland ; Cop ' corpus eral half of the cord, complete loss of sensibility of either side in that part of the body which is supplied by those nerves of the same side that enter the cord below the place of section does not re- sult. The effects that do result depend upon the animal chosen for experiment, and upon the height at which the section is made. Experiments upon the lower animals seem also to show that in their case a partial crossing of the motor paths takes place in the 1 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., i., p. 217. PATHS IN THE SPINAL COLUMNS. 125 spinal cord ; the evidence from pathology makes it doubtful whether in man any crossing from side to side occurs in the voluntary motor paths, at least below a point very high up in the neck. All the evidence shows that in the lateral columns both sensory and motor paths are to be found. 32. In addition to the general statement just made, experi- mental physiology has little to say confirming or correcting the con- clusions of histology (see p. 71 f.) as to the paths of neural impulses in the spinal cord of man. 1 Experiments which attempt to make a section, either of all the fibres in the anterior columns, leaving all the other fibres intact, or of all the other columns, leaving the fibres in the anterior columns intact, can never, indeed, be quite sure of their success. But, on the whole, their results are confirmatory of the statements made in the last article. Some investigators have endeavored to solve the same problem by directly stimulating the fibres of the different columns in such manner as to confine, as far as possible, the influence of the excitatory current (or other stimulus) to certain definitely selected fibres, and so to exclude all reflex ac- tion. It is found that no reaction, indicative of any sensory im- pulses whatever, follows the stimulation of the central ends of the anterior white columns of the spinal cord ; but stimulation of the peripheral ends of these same columns may be followed by muscu- lar contraction, sometimes (so Longet and Kiirschner found) when mechanical stimuli are used, but oftener with weak electrical cur- rents. Careful cutting of these columns is followed by no signs of pain. On the other hand, stimulation of the central cut ends of the posterior columns produces signs of pain, and other sensory effects ; for this purpose Longet has used electrical, and Eigenbrodt and Schiff mechanical stimulation. According to Schiff and others the entire cord can be cut through from before back to the posterior columns, and if these are left the animal will retain the sense of feeling. As to a further differentiation of the sensory function of these columns, different experimenters do not agree. Some would confine their function to impulses that give rise to sensations of touch, on the ground that animals, the substance of whose cord has been entirely cut through with the exception of the posterior col- umns, retain their sensations of touch, but loose their susceptibil- ity to pain from impressions made on the surfaces whose nerves enter the cord below the place of section. Impulses which give 1 Comp. the generalizations of Eckhard in the chapter on " Verlauf d. mo- torischen u. sensiblen Innervationswege im Riickenmarke," Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol.,H.,ii.,pp. 148 ff. 126 PATHS OF NERVOUS CONDUCTION. rise to sensations of pain must therefore pass elsewhere than by the posterior strands ; that is, chiefly by the gray matter of the cord. According to others, however, these strands conduct sen- sory processes only in so far as they serve for the passage through them of the nerves from the sensory roots ; it is, then, the gray sub- stance of the cord which conducts these processes along upward. In addition to the more marked sensory effects of stimulating the posterior columns, some experimenters get effects which they in- terpret as showing the presence of motor, and even of voluntary motor, paths in these columns. Stilling, for example, found that voluntary motions occurred after one entire anterior half of the cord had been cut through. But in the absence of proof that no motor paths in the lateral columns were left intact by his ex- periments, and in view of the fact that a crossing of such paths may take place in some of the animals, the evidence is not conclu- sive. Moreover, Tiirck and others have found that the posterior white columns may be entirely cut through without causing motor disturbances. In the lateral columns of the cord, paths of both motor and sen- sory impulses are probably to be found. As to the case of motor paths there is, indeed, no reasonable doubt at least there is no dis- pute. Ludwig and Woroschiloff found that, in the case of the rab- bit, voluntary movements of the hinder extremities took place even after section of the anterior and posterior strands, and of the gray matter of the cord in the cervical region. As to the proofs of sen- sory paths in the lateral columns, the evidence is somewhat con- flicting. Longet and Stilling discovered no proof of their existence ; Schiff pronounces the matter doubtful ; Tiirck found that unmistak- able signs of pain followed the cutting of these portions of the cord. Experiments upon animals and pathological observation, however, on the whole, confirm the view that the sensory are mixed with the motor paths in the lateral columns. As Wundt l expresses the ap- parent truth in the side strands of the cord a part of the system of motor fibres is shoved off toward the limits of the posterior columns and surrounded on all sides by branches of the sensory tract. It must be borne in mind that the function of neither the motor nor the sensory tracts is such that a nerve-commotion, when started in one of the columns, must necessarily run its course by the short- est path in that one column, or else not be propagated at all to its destination. Both histology and physiological experiment indi- cate that the interlacing of the nerve-fibres, and the interruption of their course with nerve-cells, provide various secondary paths in 'Grundziige d. physiolog. Psychologic, i., p. 101. Leipzig, 1880. PATHS IN THE BRAIN. 127 addition to that which may be called the primary or chief. More- over, the gray substance of the cord not only distributes, but also carries forward the nervous impulses. After entire half- section of the cord the sensory tracts of the other half still seem able, in a partially substitutionary way, to accomplish the work normal to both sides. And even in the case of the voluntary motor tracts in man's spinal cord, though such a work of substitution does not take place, we cannot affirm that the paths of voluntary innervation for a definite set of muscles are invariably the same through their entire length. A certain latitude of movement from the straight- forward course of the impulse undoubtedly exists even in such a case. 33. Difficult as it is for experimental physiology to deal with the tracing of those paths along which the sensory and motor impulses flow in the spinal cord, it is much more so within the nervous mass which fills the cranial cavity. Both the structure and the functions of the cerebrum, as a group of chief central organs, make it nearly impossible experimentally to distinguish between paths of voluntary and paths of merely reflex motion ; or even to conjecture where, within its substance, impulses that have been moving along some more clearly defined tract may not divide and, subdivide indefinitely, or conversely impulses that enter along- several converging paths be concentrated, as it were, into one or two that are more definitely fixed. The evidence by which histology has succeeded in tracing cer- tain tracts through the brain, from the medulla oblongata to the convolutions of the cerebral cortex, has been presented at sufficient length in the last chapter (see pp. 76 f., 87 f., and 97 f.). The fuller discussion of the evidence from experimental physiology concerning the same subject will more properly appear in subsequent chapters upon the automatic and reflex functions of the central organs and upon the localization of cerebral function. Certain tracts which pass directly from the crusta through the internal capsule, without en- tering the basal ganglia, into the frontal and parietal convolutions have already been referred to as probably motor. Others which come from the tegmentum, enter the thalamus and subthalamic region, and emerge after being redistributed to find their way es- pecially to the tempero-sphenoidal and occipital lobes, have been declared, in all probability, to be sensory. With this statement, so far as the motor tracts are concerned, we shall see that the con- clusions of experimental physiology accord very well. 34. But our assured knowledge from experiment concerning the paths by which sensory impulses travel in the brain is exceedingly 128 PATHS OF NERVOUS CONDUCTION. meagre. These paths are probably much more numerous and in- tricate than those along which the motor impulses are propagated. Moreover, we can seldom draw conclusions with safety concerning the sensations of the lower animals ; we therefore largely lose our help from experiment upon them to determine these sensory paths. The phenomena connected with all sensory disturbances are exceed- ingly complicated, and the conclusions they seem to warrant are often conflicting. For example, the effect of destroying a sensory nerve-tract in the head does not consist simply in the destruction or laming of some one definite function. On the contrary, if a sensory cranial nerve is severed, the various different functions of feeling pain, of pressure, and temperature, and the power of localiz- ing, in the region supplied by the nerve are all lost. But disease of the cerebro-spinal axis may impair one or more of these func- tions, and leave the others intact, in a given region of the periph- ery. Anaesthetics also may obliterate the sense of pain while leav- ing that of contact relatively unimpaired. Still more difficult of comprehension from the point of view fur- nished by the general physiology of the nerves are the degrees of tenacity with which different sensory functions, even when adminis- tered by the same sensory nerve, are combined. Loss of the sense of temperature and of the muscular sense rarely or never occur separately ; but muscular sense not infrequently disappears and the sensitiveness of the skin to pressure is retained. Upon such phenomena we have little clear light to throw. It can simply be said that the distribution of the sensory nerves within the central or- gans must be enormously complicated, and that we have absolute- ly no knowledge as to any differences in the kinds, or velocity, or paths, of the nerve-commotions there, that will help us to account for the facts. Yet such differences in the sensations doubtless rest upon differences in the nerve-commotion that causes them, within that inner projection -system of sensory impressions which is fur- nished by the cortex of the cerebrum. It has already been seen that the paths of sensory impulses cross over more or less completely within the spinal cord. They also, like the paths of motor impulses, cross in the region where the nerve-fibres in general decussate namely, in the pons varolii and medulla oblongata. Experiment and pathology both show that the principal paths of sensory impulses from all the peripheral parts of the trunk of the body and from its mucous membrane lie close to those of the motor impulses in the white nervous substance surrounding the basal ganglia. Effusions of blood in this region not only cause hemiplegia, but also produce more or less impair- PATHS IN THE BASAL GANGLIA. 129 ment of the different modifications of touch, both in the skin and in the mucous membrane. According to some authorities, lesions in the same region often so impair the muscular sense that the contraction of the muscles which is produced by electrical stimula- tion is no longer felt. Veyssiere and others suppose that injuries to the white fibrous matter of the crura cerebri, the internal cap- sule, and the foot of the corona radiata, invariably produce a loss of sensibility on one side of the body ; while those which are more definitely confined to the striate body have this effect only imper- fectly and for a time the amount of the effect depending upon the amount of the adjoining white substance which is involved in the injury. This view, like many others on the general subject, is doubtful. 35. Attempts have been made to localize the paths of sensory impulses in the optic thalami and those of motor impulses in the striate bodies ; and in connection with this view it has been held that the former are chiefly concerned in the elaboration of sensory impulses (as sensory ganglionic centres), and the latter in the elaboration of motor impulses (as motor centres). This theory has been wrought out (with much rhetoric and conjecture) by J. Luys. 1 Luys finds in the optic thalami four centres which lying in order, one behind the other in an antero-posterior line conduct and " condense " respectively the olfactory, the visual, the tact- ual, and the auditory impressions ; the corpora striata perform a similar office for the motor impulses. The sensory impressions which come from the periphery, therefore, all run through the op- tic thalami, according to this theory, in order that they may be "intellectualized" (whatever that may mean); the motor through the striate bodies, in order that they may be "materialized." It is enough in this connection to say that no such complete dis- tinction of function in the basal ganglia, whether as conductors or as central organs, has yet been made out. It is true, however, that the paths in the crusta and in and surrounding the striate bodies are probably mainly motor, while those in the tegmentum and in and around the optic thalami are mainly sensory. The tendency of the most recent investigation is toward placing more emphasis upon the fibrous nerve-matter surrounding these organs as furnishing paths for the conduction of both kinds of impulses. 1 Recherches anatomiques, physiologiques, et pathologiques sur les Centres Nerveux, 1865 ; and The Brain and its Functions, New York, 1882. 9 CHAPTER IV. AUTOMATIC AND REFLEX FUNCTIONS OF THE CENTRAL ORGANS. 1. When a physiological function is occasioned in a peripheral nerve, independently of a so-called act of will, by the stimulation of some other peripheral nerve, this function is said to be " reflex." Such a reflex function of the nerve is regularly brought about, how- ever, by the mediation of a collection of ganglion-cells and inter- lacing nerve-fibres, known as a central organ. In other words, the second ary stimulation of one peripheral nerve, through a central organ, as a result of a primary stimulation of some other periph- eral nerve, is a reflex action of the nervous elements. The entire cerebro-spinal axis is a pile of nervous centres, increasing, on the whole, in complexity of structure and of function from below up- ward, which, with the nerve-tracts running into and out of it, con- stitutes a complicated mechanism capable of an indefinite variety of such reflex functions. But the spinal cord and the medulla oblongata are the special seat of many such functions. On the other hand, all excitations of the nervous system which originate in the nervous centres themselves' that is as distinguished from being called out there by the nerve-commotion brought to them through the afferent nerves are called "automatic." The word automatic must doubtless often be used to conceal our ignorance of the real origin of a neural process. And doubtless, also, many processes which, on first inspection, appear to be automatic, may be discovered, or suspected, to be in reality reflex. But, as far as our information goes at present, not only movements of the mus- cles through the stimulating of the efferent nerves connected with them, but also the inhibiting of such movements, and the rise of sensations, must be ascribed to the automatic action of the central organs. Changes in the vital conditions to which these organs are subjected by their immediate surroundings, and especially changes in the condition of the blood with which they are supplied, ordina- rily constitute the internals timuli to which they respond by exer- cising their peculiar functions. Automatic activities belong dis- tinctively to the central ganglia of the brain ; it is more difficult to KINDS OF KEFLEX ACTION. 131 vindicate their existence in the spinal cord. In general, it is by no means easy confidently to distinguish between the purely reflex and the purely automatic action of particular central organs. The two forms of action are doubtless uniformly blended ; so that what is accomplished by any central organ depends both upon its own internal condition and molecular activity at the moment when the sensory impulse reaches it, and also upon the character of that im- pulse. Inasmuch as it is a vital molecular mechanism connected by an indefinite number of ties with other similar mechanisms, the central organ constantly acts both reflexly and automatically. 2. It follows, therefore, that several kinds of reflex action are theoretically supposable in the nervous system. When motor nerves are stimulated in a secondary way through a central organ, by applying stimulus to the sensory nerve-endings, the effect may be called reflex-motor. If an excitation of a motor nerve were transferred, without action of the will, to one or more sensory paths, such a conversion of nervous action might be called reflex-sensory. In this way the attempt has been made to explain the feeling of weariness in the muscles when they have been overexerted, or the feeling which we describe as that of a limb being "asleep." It has also been proposed to speak of "co-motor reflexes," in cases where two motor nerves are assumed to be reciprocally combined in their influence, through a central organ; or of "co-sensory," in cases where the same relation is sustained by two sensory nerves. As an example of the latter, attention has been called to the sensation which is felt in the nose when trying to look at the sun. Examples of the three last classes of alleged reflex functions of the nervous system are, however, for the most part very doubtful; or they admit of explanation by recognized causes in another way. 1 It is only concerning the laws of the first class of reflex actions the reflex-motor or sensory-motor that we have assured scientific evidence. The reflex function of a central organ may be defined, then, as being (at least in its simplest form) the " conversion " or "reflexion" of a sensory impulse into a motor excitation. We must guard ourselves carefully, however, against the misconception that lurks in these words : the effect of the central organ is never that of merely converting or reflecting a nerve-commotion from one perfectly definite sensory path to an equally definite motor path. No such simple figure of speech will serve to describe its function. 3. The spinal cord complex as its structure and functions are is much the simplest and most accessible for experimental purposes of any of the organs of the cerebro- spinal system ; it is 1 Comp. Bokhara in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., pp. 23 ff. 132 THE CORD AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. pre-eminently the seat of unconscious reflex-motor functions. It is a column or pile of centres, bound together for the reception of sensory impulses by its posterior roots and for redistributing them, as modified by its own molecular structure and condition, through the efferent fibres of the anterior roots. Such is its office as an organ of reflex action in distinction from its office as an organ for conducting neural impulses. We consider, then, in the first place, the Spinal Cord as a Central Organ. 4 As the "nerve-muscle machine" is a preparation for testing experimentally the laws of the action of the nerves as conductors, so preparations may be made for testing the laws of the reflex and automatic functions of the spinal cord, by separating that organ from the brain by section below the medulla oblongata. For the purpose of experiment, the "brainless frog " is the most convenient of such preparations and the most fruitful of results. 1 If the flank of such a frog be lightly touched, the resulting reflex motion will be limited to a slight twitching of the muscles that lie immediately beneath the spot on the skin thus stimulated. If its legs be stretched out and one of them pinched, all the segments of the limb thus irritated will be rapidly flexed in the definite purposeful way necessary to withdraw it from the irritation. If the skin of the region near the anal orifice be pinched, a new combination of muscular contractions will take place and a different form of defen- sive movements will result : the feet will be drawn up toward the spot irritated and the legs brusquely extended, as though to push away the irritating agent. If the stimulus applied to the skin of one hind leg be increased by forcibly pinching it, the resulting reflex motions may involve the fore leg of the same side, then the hind leg and fore leg of the opposide side, and finally almost all the muscles of the body. Moreover, changes in the character of these reflex motor activities take place which are plainly adapted to provide for changes in the animal's circumstances. For if the right flank of a brainless frog be irritated with a drop of acid, and at the same time the right leg be held (the member which, if un- hindered, would be, almost without exception, used in the attempt to remove the irritation), or the right foot cut off, the left foot may be used for the same purpose of defence. Phenomena, similar to those obtained in the case of the frog, are obtained from other brainless animals. Thus the decapitated salamander, when the skin of one of its sides is pinched, will bend this side into concave shape in order to withdraw it. Not succeed- 1 For detailed information see Vulpian, Le9ons sur la Physiologic du Sys- teme Nerveux, pp. 311-465. REFLEXES OF THE SPINAL COED. 133 in 01 in this way, it will make a movement with its foot as though to push away the cause of the irritation. In the case of the higher animals the reflexes of the spinal cord appear, on first inspection, to be comparatively feeble and lacking in purposeful character. The mammal, for a relatively long time after the division of the cord from the brain, exhibits only very imperfect reactions in parts of the body supplied by nerves which spring from the cord below the point of its section. But if the animal be kept alive for some time, and even without any physiological union of the severed parts, more strong, varied, and complex movements will follow upon the stimulation of the sensory nerves of those parts. Immediately after the spinal cord of a dog is divided low down in the dorsal region, the hind limbs hang limp and motionless ; irritating the skin calls forth only feeble and irregular movements, or none at all. But after some weeks or months have elapsed, reactions resembling those already described in the case of the frog (taking into account, of course, the difference in the structure and normal functions of the two animals) begin to appear. The hind limbs, instead of remain- ing motionless, will, when the animal is held so that they are pen- dent, be drawn up and let down again with a kind of regular rhythm, as a result of the constant stimulation of their motor nerves by the sensory nerves, through the spinal cord. Moreover, it is found that the breed, age, sex, and training of the animal determine the charac- ter of these brainless reflex movements. That is to say, the spinal cord, as a nervous mechanism, embodies in its very structure and functions all the peculiarities due to these causes. And when its activities are elicited through the stimulus which, arising in many various regions, flows in upon it along the sensory nerve-tracts, or through some stronger but limited impulse occasioned by the ap- plication of stimulus to a particular spot 011 the skin with a definite degree of energy, these activities bear the character both of the stimulation and of the mediating central organ. 5. Little need be added to what has already been said (Chap. II., 9), in description of that mechanism of the cord to which the foregoing remarkable functions are referred. Earlier investi- gators ! assumed the existence of a special system of sensory and motor nerve-fibres, with connecting nerve-cells, designed and appro- priated solely for executing these reflex-motor activities. That the motor tracts for reflex movements are to a certain extent distinct in the spinal cord from those devoted to specifically voluntary ac- tivities, there seems to be good reason for affirming ; but the older 1 For example, Marshall Hall, in his New Memoir on the Nervous System. London, 1843. 134 THE CORD AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. supposition, that there are double tracts, one connected with con- scious and voluntary reaction upon sensation, and one connected with unconscious and involuntary, or merely reflex-motor, reac- tion, between the spinal cord and the end-organs of sensation and motion, is almost certainly incorrect. It seems antecedently very improbable that every spot of the skin should be equipped with such a twofold outfit of both kinds of nerve-fibres. No par- ticular nerves which serve merely for reflex-motor functions, and which have no connection either with conscious sensation or with voluntary motion, can be pointed out. What happens with respect to conscious sensation the rise of it or its failure to rise depends rather upon the effect of the stimulus on the end-organ, and upon the condition in which that stimulus finds the central organ on its arrival there. In consider- ing that mechanism of the spinal cord which comes into use when it acts as a central organ in all the reflex-motor activities belonging to it, the office of the ganglion-cells is usually made prominent. And it can be definitely proved that these cells are an important part of the reflex mechanism of the cord. But the extremely del- icate network of interlacing nerve-fibres in which the processes of these cells lose themselves also bears an important part in the same functions. Precisely what elements of the central substance alone act, and precisely how the elements act that do act, it is im- possible to say. 6. The following laws embody the most important general re- sults of experiment upon the reflex-motor functions of the spinal cord, as applied to a variety of animals under a great number of changing conditions and circumstances. The primary stimulation of the sensory nerves must have a cer- tain degree of strength and suddenness in order to produce a sec- ondary excitation of the motor nerves through the centres of the spinal cord. This is true of all the different kinds of stimuli by application of which spinal reflexes can be obtained. Continuous irritation of the skin, if very slowly increased, may be carried to the extent necessary to destroy its sensitive surface, without giving rise to any reflex movements ; but a less degree of stimulus, if suddenly applied, will call forth such movements. Different chem- ical substances, when used as irritants, produce effects dependent upon the strength of the solution. Thus a weak solution ( - -J f] of sulphuric acid is recommended by some experimenters ; and it is asserted that in this way exactly the same reflex move- ments, as respects kind and degree, can be repeatedly got from the same nerve-preparation, with a machine-like regularity. Each chem- SPEED OF EEFLEX PEOCESSES. 135 ical stimulus has its lower limit of concentration which will produce any reflex movement, and also its latent period. The time of the latent period for weak solutions of sulphuric acid is said by Baxt ' to increase nearly in geometrical ratio, while the concentration of the acid diminishes in arithmetical ratio. The chemical stimulus, like the mechanical, can be so slowly increased in strength as to produce no effect. The same thing is also true of thermic stimu- lus. A decapitated frog may be placed in water, and the water gradually heated to the point at which heat-rigidity sets in, without showing any reflex activity. This fact, however, may be in part ascribed to the direct effect of the heat, diffused from the skin upon the central organ. The same law which renders stimulus inoperative, when very gradually increasing in strength, applies to the use of the electrical current. Repetition of the shocks is much more effective than a slow increase in the strength of the current. Single induction-currents are relatively powerless, and produce no effect unless they have a high degree of strength. Frequent inter- ruptions greatly increase the efficiency of the constant current in producing reflex movements. It would seem, then, that a kind of summation of afferent impulses may take place in the spinal cord ; that is to say, the repeated excitation of the nervous centre starts a nerve-commotion in its substance, which gathers intensity until it breaks over, as it were, into the adjoining motor tracts. We can scarcely affirm, however, that such summation of many impulses is necessary to start off the nervous centre, as it were, since the sin- gle making of the constant current, or a single strong induction- shock, may be followed by a number of reflex movements. 7. The speed of reflex processes is apparently increased by increasing the strength of the stimulus. We have already spoken (p. 123) of the delay which the process of conduction suffers in the spinal cord when passing longitudinally. The time of cross-con- duction also in the cord seems to be a function of the strength of the stimulus. Exner 2 calculated by an experiment, which con- sisted in causing one eyelid to move by stimulating the other, that the time consumed in the specifically central operations of the re- flex act can be made to vary between 0.055 and 0.047 of a second by increasing the strength of the stimulus. Rosenthal 3 and others have found that the time for any reflex act diminishes considerably with the increase of the strength of the stimulus ; is greater in trans- verse than in longitudinal conduction ; and is much increased by ex- 1 Quoted in Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., II, ii., p. 29. 2 See Pfliiger's Archiv, viii., p. 530 ff. 3 Monatsbericht d. Berlin. Acad., 1873, p. 104. 136 THE COED AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. haustion of the cord. With very strong stimuli it becomes almost too brief for observation. Wundt, ' however, denies that the time of the reflex act is dependent upon the strength of the stimulus ; on the contrary, he affirms that the time is either very little or none at all affected by changes in strength of the stimulus, or else is even changed in the contrary direction to that required by the alleged law of Exner and Rosenthal. 8. The condition of the spinal cord, at the time when it re- ceives the impulses of the sensory nerves, undoubtedly determines to a large extent the character of the resulting reflex motions. Lesion increases the excitability of the part below the lesion, and this for example, in the case of reflex movements of the posterior limbs according to the amount of the cord removed from the por- tion of it lying anterior to its nervous connections with these limbs. 2 Marked effects are also produced by certain drugs, as strychnine, chloroform, aconite, quinine, etc. Of these drugs, some heighten and some depress its excitability. In an animal slightly poisoned with strychnine, the excitability of the cord is more or less height- ened ; and in cases of strong poisoning with the same drug, the least stimulation may call forth a condition of tetanus or convul- sive cramping extending to the whole body. Two ways of explain- ing this effect upon the mechanism of the central organ are pos- sible : ene, that the excitability of those portions of this organ which mediate between the sensory and motor impulses is so much increased by the poison that, on being stimulated, they explode their molecular energy, as it were, and cause it to be diffused with great strength into unaccustomed paths ; the other, that the effect of the poison is to diminish the resistance along all the network of paths, both habitual and unaccustomed, in the spinal cord. Between these two explanations Eckhard 3 will not decide ; Ilosen- thal seems to prefer the former, Foster 4 and others the latter. Chloroform and various other anaesthetics diminish the reflex ac- tion of the cord. As to the effect of changes in temperature, and in electrical condition, upon the spinal reflexes, the conclusions of different experimenters are somewhat divergent. This power of the nervous mechanism is, as we have already seen, retained longer in low than in high temperatures. According to Cayrade, when the temperature of the whole cord is raised, the reflex movements, however produced, become more energetic and the single con- 1 Mechanik d. Nerven, abth. ii., pp. 14 ff. Stuttgart, 1876. 2 Vulpian, Legons, etc., p. 438. 8 In Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 42. 4 Text-book of Physiology, p. 602. THE EFFECT OF LOCALITY. 137 tractions last longer. Another observer found a temporary rise of excitability, followed by a depression, on heating sections of the cord between 75 and 158 Fahr. On the other hand, some observ- ers are of the opinion that cold increases the excitability of the cord. In experimenting with the electrical current it is very diffi- cult to distinguish between its effect upon the central organ as the mediating mechanism and the effect of the same stimulus upon the nerve-roots and nerve-paths between which the mediation occurs. 9. The locality to which the stimulus is applied has a marked influence in determining the extent and character of the resulting reflex movements. The most important difference of all is that found by stimulating some spot of the skin, and then comparing the resulting reflex action with what follows upon the application of the same stimulus to the trunk of the nerve which is distributed to that region of the skin. The simple nervous impulses, which result from stimulating the afferent nerve-fibres directly, call forth irregular spasms in 'a few muscles only ; the complicated nervous impulses, which result from applying the same stimulus to the skin, are followed by extended movement of many muscles directed toward definite ends. Moreover, it is much more easy to produce reflex action by a slight pressure on the skin than by even strong induction-shocks when applied to the nerve-trunk. By separating a small bit of skin from that surrounding it on the back of a brain- less frog, while taking care not to injure the nerves that attach it to the body, the foregoing difference may be made strikingly clear in an experimental way. 1 Whai particular reflex actions will be evoked by the stimulus is, in each case, dependent upon the particular locality of the skin to which the stimulus is applied. Such facts suggest the truth that the entire mechanism of the cord is broken up into centres of activity, which, however, are in close molecular relation with each other, and which are of a somewhat expansive nature. In view of the foregoing truths Pfliiger 2 has formulated the fol- lowing laws of relation between the stimulation and the resulting reflex action : (a) In the case of a spinal cord from which the medulla oblongata is wholly severed, all reflex motion confined to one side of the body is due to stimulation of that side, (b) Reflex movements of both sides never occur in a diagonal direction ; that is to say, stimulating one hind limb can never evoke reflex move- 1 See the article of Fick and Erlenmeyer in Pfliiger's Archiv, iii., p. 326. a In his work, Ueber d. sensorischen Functionen d. Ruckenmarks. Berlin, 1853. 138 THE CORD AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. merit of that limb and of the fore limb of the opposite side. ' (c) If reflex action is called out in the limbs of both sides, and such action is stronger on one side than on the other, then it is stronger on the side stimulated, (d) If the motor effects of the stimulation show that the excitation has been "irradiated," as it were, from one centre to another, then such movement of irradiation is always downward toward the medulla oblongata in the brain, and upward in the cord toward the same organ. It is by no means certain, however, that these formulas (especially the second No. b) admit of no exceptions which are involved in the peculiar structure and functions of the cords of certain animals. But the general rule appears to be, that the excitation of a sensory nerve with a slight degree of stimulus gives rise to reflex movements which originate in the cord on the same side, at about the same altitude as that at which the sensory impulses enter the cord ; with an increased amount of stimulus, it gives rise to those also that arise in the other half of the cord at the same altitude ; with a still greater amount, to those which arise above and below on both sides of the cord, with the preference given to the same side. That is, the molecular disturb- ance, as it is dispersed or radiated, passes from the cells and net- work of fibres situated near together on the same side of the cord, first to those on the other side of the cord at the same altitude, and then diffuses itself on both sides up and down the cord. 2 Accord- ingly, it is only after allowing for a difference in the obstacles to be overcome along the different paths anatomically open to any nerve- commotion in the spinal cord, that we can adopt the declaration of Luchsinger: 3 When an excitation is started anywhere in the spinal cord, it radiates from this point in all directions, but with diminishing intensity. Hence the title which Flourens and Vul- pian, 4 following him, have given to the spinal cord "the organ for the dispersion of irritations." 10. Besides such undoubted reflex action as the foregoing, other cases where the spinal cord controls the muscles of the body are less certainly of a purely reflex character. Indeed, for some such cases the title of " automatic " has been employed. The cord is not capable of " irregular automatism " that is, of spontaneous excitation like that which takes place in the higher nervous centres 1 See the observations of Luchsinger, which seem to show that in some ani- mals as, e.g., the salamander, turtle, and even dogs, when under the influ ence of ether cross reflexes in violation of Pfluger's law do sometimes occur. Pfliiger's Archiv, xxii., pp. 179 ff. 2 Compare Wundt, Grundziige d. physiol. Psychologic, i., pp. 103 and 109. 3 Pfluger's Archiv, xxii., p. 178. 4 Lemons sur la Physiologic, etc. , p. 404. TONIC ACTION OF THE CORD. 139 on volition. If a brainless frog, for example, be kept in a condi- tion of perfect equilibrium with respect to stimulus, it will remain wholly motionless. But the cord of such an animal will continue to influence certain muscles of the body through the motor nerves, even in cases where sensory impulses are difficult or impossible to trace. What is called the " tonic action " of the cord upon the skeletal and sphincter muscles, or the smooth muscles of the ar- teries, is a chief illustration of this influence. The fact that such tonic action does not contract all the muscles connected with the cord at the same time, or any one set of them with the same en- ergy as any other, throws some suspicion on its alleged automatic character. A careful sifting of the evidence rather induces us to ascribe this influence to the constant reflex action of stimulus from subtle changes in the external circumstances in which the animal is placed. Moreover, the sensory nerves in the muscles and ten- dons, as well as in the skin and organs of special sense, may occa- sion the rise and continuance of such reflex action. Different in- vestigators, almost without exception, have failed to notice any lengthening of a muscle (or loss of its tone) when the nerve going to it is severed from the cord. That this so-called "tonic" influ- ence is largely reflex-motor is also shown by the fact that the tone of the muscles is lost when the skin covering them is removed, or when the posterior root which furnishes sensory impulses for the motor nerves connected with them is cut. Brondgeest has shown that, when a decapitated frog is hung up after having the sciatic plexus cut on one side, the leg is more flexed (that is, the muscles have more of tone) on the other side. But the same flaccid condition of the muscles can be produced by cutting only the posterior (or sen- sory) roots of this plexus. This observer is satisfied that the con- traction of the muscles in the uninjured limb is due to stimulation from the nerves of the skin ; the tonic action of the cord on the skeletal muscles is, therefore, reflex. The only objection to consid- ering the tone of the sphincter muscles reflex lies in the fact that this tone continues to exist after all other reflex-motor action has been suppressed by narcotics ; but our knowledge of the nervous mechan- ism which controls these muscles is not sufficiently complete to make it certain that we have excluded all possible forms of reflex influence. Of the marked influence of the nervous system upon the cali- bre of the arteries, and through this upon the character of the circulation of the blood, there is abundant evidence. Besides the main vaso-motor centres in the medulla oblongata, certain parts of the -spinal cord are capable of acting as such centres. Circulation may continue with regularity in a beheaded frog ; but the removal 140 THE CORD AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. also of any considerable part of the cord affects the circulation through the loss of tone in the blood-vessels which it occasions. The mechanisms for expanding and contracting the arteries are apparently interlaced with those for contracting the skeletal mus- cles, in all portions of the cord. But their chief work undoubt- edly consists in transforming afferent impulses into efferent vaso- motor impulses directed toward the dilatation or constriction of the arteries. Whether they are capable of automatic action in the sense in which the medulla oblongata seems to be thus capable is a question we need not discuss in detail here. 11. The facts already alluded to, and others similar, form the basis for the assumption of " Centres " in the spinal cord. In general, the application of a given amount of stimulus to a definite group of sensory nerves calls forth reflex-motor activities in definite groups of muscles by means of a certain region of the cord. What groups of muscles are thus moved depends upon the amount of the stimu- lus and the locality of its application. This fact is due to disper- sion of that nerve-commotion which is set up at different points in the course of the cord by the excitation of those points through the sensory nerves. That is to say, the mechanism of this central organ is so constructed as to connect the sensory with the motor tracts, more favorably in some regions than in others. Such re- gions are the so-called reflex centres of the spinal cord. If, how- ever, a more or less constant flow of motor impulses takes place from any region, and this flow is due to molecular activity not occasioned by the sensory nerve-fibres of the region, then such region may also be called an automatic centre. Nothing would seem to prevent the same region from acting as both a reflex and an automatic centre. The general principle may then be formulated as follows : " The spinal cord is the proximate centre, the proximate physiological hearth of excitation, for all the nerves that originate from it." This principle has been defended and illustrated with many researches by Legallois, Volkmann, Pfliiger, Goltz, Luchsinger, and others. In accordance with it, and especially since the "epoch- making " experiments of Goltz upon the spinal cord of dogs, many functions which were formerly ascribed to the brain have been shown to have their proximate centre in the spinal-cord. In ac- cordance with the same principle, it is discovered that different animals have different spinal centres varying in relation to their peripheral structure and their habits. 1 1 Compare the results of the researches of Langendorff in the Archiv f . Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1880, pp. 518 ff., and 1881, pp. 519 ff. ; and of Luchsinger in Pfluger's Archiv, xxii., pp. 158 ff., and xxiii., pp. 308 ff. CENTRES IN THE SPINAL COED. 141 Iii illustration of the last point the following facts may be men- tioned : By the sufficiently long-continued and strong stimulation of any portion of the skin of a decapitated frog, reflex movements may be induced in all of its muscles. With rabbits, however, a reflex action of one hind leg can be caused by stimulating the sensory nerves of a fore leg, only in case a portion of the medulla oblon- gata (at least about one-third) be left attached to the cord. With the cord alone, the stimulation of one hind leg fails to excite ac- tion in either of the fore limbs. By using great care and artificial respiration, Luchsinger 1 succeeded in obtaining what he calls a " trotting reflex " from the spinal cord after being completely sev- ered from the medulla oblongata of several young animals with which that form of movement is natural. Thus the diagonal op- posite extremities of goats and cats w T ere moved in response to even such weak stimulation as passive motion of the fore leg, gen- tle pressure, and weak electrical currents. In general, then, it would seem that the spinal cord of every animal is a series of con- nected mechanisms, which are arranged so as to move the muscles of the body, either under the control of the higher nervous centres or in response to stimulation entering it at any point through the sensory peripheral nerves, in accordance with the specific structure and habits of the animal. Many of the chief special centres connected with the organic and vital functions are located in the medulla oblongata; those con- nected with the co-ordination of impressions of the special senses and muscular action belong to the still superior portions of the cerebro-spinal system. But the spinal cord also contains mechan- isms which serve as centres of both these kinds. 2 Their location, however, is so much a matter of the special physiology of particular species of animals, and is so indirectly connected with the inquiries of physiological psychology, that it is unnecessary to add anything further upon the subject. 12. The question whether the spinal cord is excitable as a whole, and in its several parts, by artificial stimulation, has been much debated. Its direct excitability as a whole is denied by 1 See Pfliiger's Arcliiv, xxviii., pp. 65 ff. 2 Besides the vaso-motor centres already referred to, those for micturition, defecation, erection, parturition, etc., may also be mentioned. Goltz, in his celebrated researches in 1874 (see Pfliiger's Archiv, viii., pp. 474 ff.), showed that normal micturition may take place in a dog in which the lumbar region has been completely severed from the dorsal region. The influence of the cerebral centres seems, however, to be necessary to cause a steady increase or decrease of the action of the sphincter ani. The cilio-spinal centre, located by Budge at the seventh and eighth cervical roots, is more doubtful. 142 EXCITABILITY OF THE CORD. Schiff, ' who declares that the motions obtained by stimulating any part of the cord with electricity comprise only those muscles which are physiologically related, to the exclusion of those which are ana- tomically contiguous through the stimulated part of the cord. A strong local stimulus, he affirms, produces just the same reflex mo- tions as those which are accustomed to arise on occasion of an ex- tended irritation of the skin at the places to which the nerves is- suing from this locality of the cord are distributed. It is inferred, then, that the resulting motions are obtained only reflexly, by in- volving the sensory nerve-roots. Bat that certain longitudinal parts of the cord can be directly stimulated seems capable of demonstra- tion. For Fick and Engelken 2 found that movements of the mus- cles were obtained when the anterior columns were isolated from the rest of the cord for a considerable distance and then stimulated. Luchsinger's 3 experiments, moreover, contradict the conclusions of Schiff; and Mendelssohn 4 found that the reaction-time of the an- terior half, and especially of the anterior columns of the cord, was uniformly less than the reaction-time of its posterior columns. The latter also found that weaker stimuli would suffice to excite motion when applied to the anterior columns. But, according to Schiff 5 again, the cord contains no motor elements that are directly exci- table except the central paths of the nerve-roots. He also agrees with van Deen in denying that the gray matter of the cord can be made, by direct stimulation, to originate either motor or sensory impulses. It affords paths, however, for the transmission of both these kinds of impulse when once started by the other nervous ele- ments. Schiff accordingly speaks of the posterior gray columns, and of those parts of the posterior white columns which are not direct prolongations of the nerve-roots, as " cesthesodic." The corre- sponding parts of the anterior cord he calls "kinesodic." The sen- sitiveness of the posterior columns which others discover on experi- ment he regards as only indirect. Vulpian, 6 on the contrary, agrees with BeU, Magendie, Flourens, and Longet, in holding that, while the gray matter is absolutely inexcitable and the posterior columns very excitable, the anterior columns possess only a moderate degree of excitability. 1 See, especially, articles in Pfliiger's Archiv, xxviii., pp. 537-555, and xxix., pp. 537-555. 2 Du Bois-Reymond's Archiv, 1867, p. 198 ; and Pfliiger's Archiv, ii., p. 414. "Pfliiger's Archiv, xxii., pp. 169-176. 4 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1883, Physiolog. Abth., pp. 282 ff. 6 Pfliiger's Archiv, xxix. , p. 598. 6 Le9ons sur la Physiologic du Systeme nerveux, p. 362. INFLUENCE OF THE BRAIN ON THE CORD. 143 By an ingenious arrangement for applying the mechanical stimu- lus of pricks from an extremely fine needle-point to definitely cir- cumscribed spots in the spinal cord of the frog, E. A. Birge ' seems to have demonstrated the susceptibility of the ganglion-cells to di- rect stimulus. Pricking these cells produces movements in defi- nitely located groups of muscles ; and the te tanusis invariably confined to the muscles of the same side as that of the cells stimu- lated, unless (as microscopic examination shows) the effect of the needle has reached certain cells on the other side. Birge also found that different regions of a single cross-section of the cord are excitable in different degrees ; the region from the posterior fissure to the median line of the gray matter being most inactive, and that of the large ganglion-cells in the anterior horn sinvariably being able to produce tetanus. In view of such conflict of testimony it can only be said that certain longitudinal parts of the spinal cord are plainly susceptible to direct stimulation, but at present it is difficult to decide which parts, exclusively, are sensitive. 13. Thus far the spinal cord has been considered as a series of related centres, that act automatically or reflexly when separated from the brain. But in its normal condition the cord always acts, of course, under the influence of the brain. The brain thus exer- cises a profound modifying influence over the automatic and reflex activities of the inferior organ. The cord alone can be depended upon, as it were, to respond with great regularity, in the form of definite reflex movements, to a given amount of stimulus, when applied at a given locality. But the action of the brain, when at- tached to the cord, interferes with this regularity, so that the ex- pected muscular movements may not result when the stimulus is applied. They are then said to be inhibited by the action of the brain. The phenomena of "inhibition," when connected with vo- lition, are familiar enough ; for example, one may voluntarily re- strain those movements of one's legs which the cord, if left to it- self, would produce as the result of tickling the soles of the feet. But the brain without conscious volition exercises the same in- hibitory action over the spinal cord. If a frog is suspended by the head, and its legs allowed to dip into a vessel of dilute acid, the in- terval between the contact of the acid and the withdrawal of the legs is considerably lengthened when the spinal cord remains un- divided below the medulla oblongata ; that is to say, the cord alone withdraws the legs quicker than the cord when influenced, or in- hibited, by the brain. The interval between the application of the 1 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1882, Physiolog. Abth., pp. 481-489. 144 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. acid and the contraction of the muscles can also be prolonged, when the brain is still connected with the cord, by applying chemical irritation at the same time to the optic lobes ; that is to say, the cord is hindered from performing its reflex-motor function by the stimulation, and consequent influence upon itself, of the higher nervous centre. Moreover, if at the time that one leg of a brain- less frog is dipped into the acid, the sciatic nerve of the other is strongly stimulated with an interrupted current, the same prolon- gation of the period of incubation will be observed ; in some cases, indeed, the reflex act will not take place at all. In discussing the reciprocal relations of the higher centres of the brain, we shall dis- cover many phenomena similar to the foregoing. All these centres may exercise this so-called " inhibitory " action upon other centres, according to their several physiological connections. The phenom- ena of inhibition are not, therefore, confined to the influence of the brain on the spinal cord. Elaborate attempts have been made to point out a special mech- anism of inhibition. Thus Setschenow * has advocated the view that localized inhibitory centres exist in the brain, and that the de- pressing effect travels by certain definite tracts in the spinal cord. But on this subject our doubts are entitled to go even beyond the remark of Fender : 3 " The nature of the inhibitory mechanism is exceedingly obscure." We cannot be said to have sufficient grounds for assuming the existence of any such specific mechanism. In general, nerve-commotions modify each other within the central organs ; they either facilitate and increase, or inhibit and diminish, each other's effect, according to the structure and functions of the organs, the amount and kind of stimulus thrown in upon them from without, and the exact condition in which this stimulus finds them. The inhibition of the cord by the brain is, then, only a special case under the general molecular theory of the nervous mechanism. The factors entering into every such case will very likely always prove too varied and complex to be analyzed with complete success. 14. On passing from the spinal cord into the brain, the diffi- culty of defining the specific functions whether automatic or re- flex of the different central organs becomes greatly increased. The phenomena are vastly more complicated, and the methods of analyzing them experimentally much less readily applied. The 1 Ueber d. Hemmungsmechanismen 1 d. Reflexthatigkeit im Gehirn d. Frosches, Berlin, 1863 ; and other papers. 8 Functions of the Brain, London, 1876, p. 18, where he refers to the elaborate paper on Inhibition in the West Riding Reports, vol. iv., by Dr. L. Brunton. THE METHODS OF RESEARCH. 145 most complex portions of the nervous substance, in respect both to structure and to function, are most completely withdrawn from the use of strictly scientific methods of research. What is known, however, of the anatomical structure and connections of the dif- ferent organs of the brain, and of the paths along which the ner- vous impulses are propagated between them, prepares the way for the more specific physiology of each organ. The methods of such physiological research are in general these two : Observation of the results which follow the application of stimulus to each of the en- cephalic organs, or to any definite locality in each ; and observation of the results which follow the total extirpation or lesion of these organs, or of any portion of each. Of course, both of these methods are almost wholly applicable only to the lower animals. In using the method of stimulation, the stimulus cannot be ap- plied to the nervous substance of the brain without a certain amount of injury to that substance. To stimulate any of the cranial organs with precision they must be exposed ; those that lie deepest cannot be exposed without injury to other organs and the death of the animal. Moreover, it is difficult precisely to circumscribe the application of the stimulus. Just that form of stimulus which is most convenient, effective, and fruitful in results namely, the electrical current is liable to diffuse its direct effects beyond the region which it is desired to circumscribe. When no result follows the application of the current to a definite locality of the nervous substance, the failure may be due to the weakness of the stimulus, or to the fact that this particular centre is at the moment inhib- ited by its condition or by the activity of some connected centre. When a result does follow, it may be that this particular result is due to the direct or indirect stimulation of some other so-called centre, or to the stimulus hitting, by diffusion or otherwise, some of the contiguous sensory or motor nerve-tracts. Objection may also be raised against the nature of the argument by which an inference is drawn from the facts gained by the sec- ond of the above-mentioned methods. Such argument not only as- sumes that the activities which remain, when some of the organs of the brain are partially or wholly destroyed, belong to those organs that remain, but also that those activities which have dis- appeared belong to the organs that have disappeared. Both of these assumptions are, however, doubtful, when we come to apply them to the organs in their normal condition and connections under the action of natural stimuli ; the latter of the two is partic- ularly doubtful. In a word, the different mechanisms of the human brain, in their normal condition and relations, constitute an in- 10 146 THE BRAIN AS A CENTKAL OKGAN. ter-dependent and intimately related system ; what each so-called organ or centre does, or can do, depends not only upon its own structure and condition at the time, but also upon the condition and behavior of the other organs and centres at the same time. Such interdependence extends not only to those divisions which gross anatomy can mark off and consider under the name "the organs of the brain," nor simply to those minuter subdivisions w r hich histology can distinguish by aid of the microscope ; it doubt- less also extends to the last details of that molecular mechanism which the brain-substance is. These details are different for every individual animal, and for every individual case. Specific differences belonging to the different species of animal life, as well as those idiosyncrasies with which pathology is familiar, must alike be recognized. It is by no means strange, then, that the physi- ology of the brain is able only very slowly and imperfectly to win from nature the truth, and to remove the reproach of apparently conflicting facts. In spite of the above-mentioned difficulties certain results may be claimed as resting upon more or less of clear evidence regard- ing the specific automatic and reflex-motor functions of those inter- cranial organs that lie inferior to the cerebral hemispheres. The case of these hemispheres themselves will be subsequently consid- ered in detail. For they are those portions of the nervous mechan- ism about the immediate correlation of which with the phenomena of consciousness there can be no doubt. Since we are now con- sidering the nervous system and its central organs merely as a physical mechanism, we definitely rule out, as far as possible, all allusion to any special relation between it and the phenomena of self-conscious mind. 15. Besides the spinal cord, the Medulla Oblongata is the cen- tral organ concerning whose automatic and reflex-motor functions the largest amount of precise information exists. The reflex-motor functions of this organ are more intricate and of a higher order than those belonging primarily to the cord. They are especially such as stand related to the vital functions of the heart and blood- vessels ; to respiration and its allied movements of the organs in coughing and sneezing, etc. ; to- the movements of the muscles in swallowing and vomiting ; to the mimetic movements of laughing, weeping, etc. Among the different movements in the execution of which the medulla oblorigata is concerned, some are more purely reflex and some less so. Thus one cannot swallow if the sen- sory tracts from the throat to this central organ are broken ; but the movements of the heart and lungs continue after the reflex- THE MEDULLA AS AUTOMATIC. 147 motor paths to them are destroyed. Sensory stimulations of the medulla oblongata, as a rule, occasion reflex movements by second- ary stimulation of a number of motor tracts. Swallowing, sneezing, coughing, shedding of tears, changes in respiration and in the movements of the heart, contortions of the countenance, may all be occasioned, through the mediation of this organ, by one and the same sensory impulse. There is also a marked difference in the extent of the domain over which the motor results of stimulating the different sensory paths connected with the medulla spread themselves. Stimulation of the optic nerve occasions only very limited reflex movements, such as the winking of the eyes, the se- cretion of a few tears, and a slight tendency to sneeze. Stimula- tion of the nerves of taste extends over a wider area of motor tracts ; that of the palate and larynx still wider. 16. The most important reflex centres of the medulla oblon- gata are also automatic ; of such centres he chief are those con- nected with breathing, the movements of the heart, and the inner- vation of the blood-vessels. The excitation in these cases must be considered as a neural process arising within the central organ itself. The cause of its origin is doubtless to be found in the changes that occur in the supply and character of the blood. Not only all abnormal conditions of respiration, like dyspnoea and apncea, but also the rhythm of normal respiration, are dependent upon the changing condition of the blood with respect to its more or less perfect oxidation. The stimulus to action of the respiratory centre in the medulla, from the condition of the blood, may be in part reflexly applied through the peripheral ends of the afferent nerves in various parts of the body ; but the main effect is doubt- less produced by the direct action of the blood on this centre. Its rhythmic nervous action may then very well be dependent upon the rhythmic action of the lungs, and upon the resulting periodic re- oxidation of the blood. For the nervous substance of the medulla oblongata seems to be peculiarly susceptible to the condition of the blood. 17. This small central organ into which the spinal cord ex- pands on entering the skull may then be said to be thickly crowded with reflex and automatic centres. To speak of the more important will best serve to exhibit what is known of its mech- anism. The respiratory centre was first located by Flourens in that part of the medulla oblongata which serves as the place of origin for the vagus nerve, and then more definitely in the V-shaped apex of the fourth ventricle, or beak of the calamus scriptorius. Since 148 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. extirpation or injury of this small portion of the nervous sub- stance, when all other parts of the body are left intact, causes immediate and final cessation of respiration, Flourens called it the "vital knot" (noeud vital). Foster 1 locates this centre below the vaso-motor centre, and between it and the calamus scriptonus. Schiff concludes that it is double, and lies on either side in the region of the anterior part of the ala cinerea ; the function of each side, he thinks, is separate. In case of need it may be shifted slightly backward toward the spinal cord. The efforts of Gierke 3 to fix it in a definite group of ganglion-cells were not successful. With this same centre all the modifications of respiration in sigh- ing, sobbing, yawning, crying, laughing, coughing, sneezing, and hiccoughing are connected. A nervous centre intimately connected with the vaso-motor sys- tem of the different parts of the body exists in the middle part of the medulla oblongata. Since we cannot examine experimentally the effect upon the action of this centre which would be produced by severing all the afferent nerves that lead into it, we cannot demonstrate directly how much of its action is automatic, how much reflex. It is probably both automatic and reflex. But the removal of the parts in front of the medulla, inclusive of the cor- pora quadrigemina, exercises no perceptible influence on the blood- pressure. The principal vaso-motor centres in the brain are then found in this portion of the medulla oblongata. Through it reflex motions are called forth of the most different kinds, and involving muscles widely separated from each other and from the region of the skin where the stimulus is applied. Witness the effect of a draught of air upon the circulation of the blood. The arteries of a rabbit's ear can be made to contract by stimulating any one of more than a half-dozen different sensory nerves, including the sciatic plexus. In this same central organ must be located the so-called cardio-inhib- itory centre. In cases where the heart is stopped by sudden and great emotion, or by severe pain, the stimulus probably reaches the medulla from the hemispheres of the brain. The centre of deglutition lies in the medulla higher up than that of respiration. If this part of the organ be destroyed, swallowing is impossible. This centre has been located in the floor of the fourth ventricle. In the floor of the same ventricle, and in the adjoining region, are probably located centres for different secre- tions as, for example, of spittle, or sweat, of tears, and possibly of the pancreatic and other digestive juices. The connection of 1 Text-Book of Physiology, p. 370. 2 See Pfluger's Archiv, vii., pp. 583 ff. INFLUENCE OF MEDULLA ON THE LIMBS. 149 various sensations and emotions with these secretions is too famil- iar to need description. A central mechanism for winking the eyes Exner would place near the beak of the calamus scriptorium. The central mechanism for the reflex movement of the muscles of the oesophagus and stomach also lies in the medulla oblongata. Of the centre for the production of artificial diabetes, and of other more conjectural centres which are packed within this small bit of nervous matter, scarcely more than an inch in length, we do not need to speak. 18. The alleged functions of the medulla oblongata in the co- ordination of the movements of the skeletal muscles ally this organ more closely with certain other inferior parts of the brain. The preparation of a frog which has retained this organ, in addition to the spinal cord, although without any of the rest of the brain, will execute movements of the muscles that are not possible for the cord alone. It will not, indeed, move spontaneously ; it still requires external stimulation to start the mechanism of such a preparation. Under such stimulation, however, it will assume a position natural to it in an uninjured state. When laid on its back it will make efforts generally unsuccessful to turn over. The movements of the limbs with which it responds to vaiious sensory impulses are more complicated than those executed by the spinal cord alone ; they even resemble crawling motions or short leaps. Placed in the water, what is left of the animal will swim ; and if its motions are less perfect than those of the perfect frog, they are much more so than those of the cord alone. It is doubtful whether, when placed beneath the water, it will ascend to the surface to breathe, or make efforts to escape from water gradually heated to about 104 Fahr., as will the animal that retains its cerebellum and optic lobes. Reflex movements of considerable complexity can also be exe- cuted by mammals that have been deprived of all the encephalic centres above the medulla. Vulpian claims that a young rat in this condition will emit a cry, as of pain, when its toes are pinched. Such s a mechanism will swallow and execute certain co-ordinated movements of the limbs. Infants whose nervous centres above the medulla are undeveloped will perform the associated movements of sucking when put to the breast. Moreover, the effects of le- sion of the centres of the medulla are very marked in respect to the co-ordination of motion. Rolando observed that convulsive move- ments followed extensive injury of this central organ. More recent researches seem to show that the seat of these epileptiform move- ments is at the place of union between the medulla and the pons ; 150 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. it can, therefore, scarcely be located in either alone. 1 One sided lesions are followed by certain so-called " forced " and rotary move- ments of the head, and eyes, and trunk. Such effects are most likely to be produced when the injury affects the region of the tuberculum acuslicum. In the opinion of Bechterew 2 the olivary bodies are in relation with the gray matter of the third ventricle, and with the semicircular canals, as central organs for the co-or- dination of the muscles used in balancing according to impressions of touch. It would then be one chief function of the medulla to secure equipoise through these sensory impressions. On the whole, it appears certain that considerable work in co-ordinating the muscular movements falls upon its mechanisms. Of such work it is probable that the movements concerned in articulate speech are a part. Any indirect relation which it may have to the produc- tion of those sensations and images which are woven into our dreams does not belong in this connection. 19. The associations among the different centres of the me- dulla oblongata are curious enough ; they involve an extremely intricate physiological apparatus. Some of these centres are in- directly connected with psychical activities. They are not all alike excitable ; they are not all voluntarily so. Thus we can volun- tarily control, within certain limits, the movements of the lungs, but not those of the heart and blood-vessels ; we can cough, but cannot sneeze, at will. Some of their functions are associated together regularly ; some of them seldom ; some never. Swallow- ing is not necessarily connected with the activity of the other cen- tres, unless it be with that for the secretion of saliva ; it takes place, however, during arrest of respiration. The excitation of no other centre necessarily affects this centre. The secretion of saliva is constantly connected with a change in the circulation through the submaxillary glands. 20. An animal which possesses all, or a considerable part of the other nervous mechanisms of the brain that lie below the cere- bral hemispheres is capable of executing movements which differ greatly from those already described as belonging to the spinal cord and medulla oblongata. Very few of the movements of such a preparation are, indeed, even apparently spontaneous; for al- most all of them a definite form and degree of stimulus acting on the sensory surfaces can be assigned. We are inclined, then, to sus- pect that those movements which are apparently spontaneous are really due to some stimulation from without the central organs 'See Eckhard, in Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 98. 2 Pniiger's Archiv, xxxi., pp. 479 if., and xxix., p. 258 f. INFLUENCE OF THE CEREBRAL LOBES. 151 which has escaped our observation. But the range of reflex-motor activities which an animal deprived simply of its cerebral hemi- spheres will execute, in response to appropriate stimuli, is very great ; it may be said to include every form of movement possible for the uninjured animal. The statement is, therefore, warranted by all our knowledge of the facts, that the medulla, pons, crura cerebri, cerebellum, corpora quadrigemina (or optic lobes), and basal ganglia generally are the special mechanism for co-ordi- nating the movements of the muscles with the various impulses of sense. A frog from which the cerebral lobes have been removed will respond to appropriate stimuli with all the movements of which a perfect frog is capable. It will swim, leap, and crawl. When placed on its back, it will easily and at once regain its natural posi- tion. When placed on a tilting board, it will constantly adjust the position of its body so as to maintain an equilibrium. It will croak with the regularity of a music-box when its flanks are gently stroked. Thrown into the water it will swim with great regularity of motion until it is exhausted or finds something as a small piece of wood placed in contact with it upon which it can crawl. When submerged in the water, it will rise to the surface for air ; it will not, like a mere spinal cord, remain quietly in water the temper- ature of which is gradually raised, but will make violent efforts to escape. It is guided by the light, for it avoids objects that cast a strong shadow. On the other hand, it appears stupid ; it pays no attention to the flies that are placed near it ; by careful exclusion of all stimuli it may be kept motionless for hours. We cannot argue from this, however, that it is without sensations, for it may not be hungry ; and Heubel 1 asserts that a sound frog may, with careful manipulation, be made to lie still upon its back for a long time. Similar phenomena occur in the case of the mammal whose cere- bral hemispheres have been removed. The rabbit or rat thus operated upon will stand and run and leap. Placed on its back, it will regain its feet. It will follow with its head a bright light held in front of it ; it will start and tremble, or run, at a shrill or loud noise. It will utter a prolonged cry when pinched. Its mus- cular motions are obviously co-ordinated in response to sensory impulses from the organs of touch, hearing, and sight. The bird thus operated upon will easily regain its feet when laid upon its side or back, and will stand in a natural and easy posture. It will tuck its head under its wings, clean its feathers, and pick up corn 1 Pfliiger's ArcMv, xiv. , pp. 162 ff. 152 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. or drink water presented to its beak. Thrown into the air, it will fly with considerable precision for some distance, and in its flight will guide itself, though imperfectly, so as to avoid obstacles in its way. It will start at sharp sounds or flashes of light. Such ani- mals have on the whole the appearance of being sleepy and stupid rather than of being deprived of any of their powers for co-ordi- nating sensation and motion. We conclude, then, that the organs which such animals possess are functionally capable of exercising all these powers of co-ordination ; we do not at present raise the question whether this implies the existence of psychical phenomena or not. The phenomena which follow the partial loss of the cere- bral hemispheres in the higher mammals confirm the same conclu- sion. It is much more difficult, however, to assign the special place which belongs to each of the organs that lie between the medulla oblongata and the cerebral hemispheres, under their general func- tion as already stated. They are all very intimately related ; act to a large extent dependently ; can, within certain limits, assume each other's functions ; and have largely the same connections with the peripheral organs of sense and of motion, and the same work to do as mediating between the two. 21. It is impossible to determine the special functions of the Cerebellum, so conflicting is the testimony of different experiment- ers. A high degree of probability, however, attaches itself to the statement that this organ is largely concerned in the co-ordination of motion ; although such statement cannot be held to exhaust its functions. The more specific theory of Wundt 1 "It is the central organ that brings such movements of the animal's body as are ex- cited by impulses from the cerebrum, into accord with its situation as a whole in space" is more doubtful, precisely because it is more specific. Comparative anatomy seems to show that the office of the cerebellum in some animals differs from its office in man ; reasoning from the former to the latter is, therefore, especially pre- carious. Moreover, its functions are so closely connected anatom- ically with those of the pons, the crura cerebri, and the medulla, that it is difficult precisely to separate its work from that done by these organs. Testimony as to the result of the extirpation or lesion of the cere- bellum is very conflicting. Apparently almost the entire length and breadth of its surface (in the direction of the posterior bones of the skull), and not only the gray matter, but also the white, as far as near the bifurcation of its strands, may be removed without Grundzuge d. physiologisclie Psychologie, L, p. 201. LESIONS OF THE CEREBELLUM. 153 any observable result. J On approaching the middle of its thick- ness and removing the strands connected with the middle peduncles, disturbances of motion begin and increase rapidly in proportion to the amount of substance removed. Most of these disturbances, if the animal recovers well, prove to be only temporary; they are, therefore, probably due largely to traumatic excitation. Permanent disturbances, however, occur when the injuries reach the lower third of the organ, or when they are confined to this third. Vulpian accordingly concludes that the disturbance of gait which results from injury of the cerebellum, is due to the irritation of its more profound white parts or of the adjoining cerebral isthmus. But Schiff believes that the mass of the organ, apart from locality, has a definite influence upon the co-ordination of the bodily movements ; though what that influence is cannot yet be clearly defined. The influence of locality seems to be considerable upon the effect which results from lesions in a given amount of the cerebellar substance ; but since this influence is much more marked near the connections of the cerebellum with other contiguous organs, some observers attribute it largely or wholly to the injury by extension of the lesion, by pressure, or by inflammation of these organs. Thus the place of its union with the medulla oblongata and the regions near the crura cerebri are especially important. But Schiff found, in experimenting upon mammals, that complete vertical section of the cerebellum, in the exact median line of the vermiform process, and removal with the knife or pincers of the entire substance, with the exception of the flocculi and the parts external to the peduncles, produced no appreciable loss of the power of co-ordination. The effect of one-sided lesions of the cerebellum in the disturb- ance of motion seems to be, as a rule, much more certain and marked than that of symmetrical lesions of both sides. Schiff, in- deed, asserts that when a bilateral lesion is perfectly symmetrical it produces no impairment whatever of the functions of motion. But the entire evidence from experiment shows that sudden lesion of one hemisphere of this organ is almost uniformly followed by at least temporary impairment of the motor functions. Section of the middle peduncle of the cerebellum of a bird or mammal almost always occasions so-called " forced " movements ; the animal rolls around its own longitudinal axis, generally, though not invariably, toward the injured side. Nystagmus, or the peculiar rolling move- ment of the eyes suggestive of vertigo, and strabismus, take place 1 Compare Vulpian, Legons sur la Physiologie, etc., pp. 603 ff.; Eckhard, in Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol. IL,ii.,pp. 102 ff.; Schiff, in Pfliiger's Archiv., xxxii., pp. 427 ff.; and Ferrier, Functions of the Brain, pp. 85-123. 154 THE BRAIX AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. in such cases. One eye may be moved inward and downward, the other outward and upward. Hitzig 1 and Ferrier a found the same results to follow injury of the lateral lobe. The latter observed that strong stimulation of the cerebellar surface with the interrupted current causes associated movements of the eyes and head and limbs, in cats and dogs and monkeys. But these effects may be largely due to the connection of the cerebellum with the me- dulla oblongata. The evidence from pathological cases in man conflicts, to a con- siderable extent, with the conclusions which we might hasten to derive from experiment upon the animals. According to Vulpian 3 it is by no means rare to have unilateral lesions of the cerebellum followed by no paralysis of either side. In a great number of such cases no genuine hemiplegia results ; the resulting enfeeblement of motion, moreover, is as often on the same as on the opposite side. M. Andral is said to have made a collection of ninety-three cases of diseases of the cerebellum, in only one of which ataxy was ob- served in any marked way. In most cases w r here crossed hemi- plegia does result, Vulpian thinks it due to the destruction or compression of the adjacent parts, especially the roots of the cere- bellar peduncles. The same authority denies that the superficial parts of this organ are excitable, or that lesion of them is followed by pain or by convulsions of the body, face, or eyes. Such results do, however, follow excitation and lesion of its deeper parts, in proportion to the degree of approach to the peduncles. The dis- crepancy between experiment and pathology may perhaps be re- moved, at least in part, by remembering that the injury is sudden in the one case and not in the other. Moreover, few of the patho- logical cases are clearly enough defined to serve as a sure basis for conclusions. Some of them, however, would seem to warrant cer- tain inferences. More than fifty years since, the well-known case of the girl Alexandrine Labrosse was reported by Combette, 4 and after- ward made known to students of physiology generally by Longet. 5 This girl was found, on post mortem, to have no cerebellum ; in its stead was a gelatinous membrane attached to the medulla by two peduncles of like construction. A true pons was also wanting, but no loss of substance seemed to have taken place here. Yet she could co-ordinate all the limbs voluntarily, and had the full use of 1 Untersuchungen iiber d. Gehirn, pp. 198 ff. 2 Functions of the Brain, p. 106 f. 3 Legons sur la Physiologic, etc. , p. 607 f. 4 Revue medicale, II., p. 57 (1831). 6 Anatomie et Physiologie du Systeme nerveux, I., p. 764 (1842). LESIONS OF THE CEREBELLUM. 155 all the senses. She was, however, subject to falling (se laissait tomber sou vent) and spoke imperfectly. Bouillaud has reported another case of an adult whose entire cerebellum was changed into a brown purulent mass ; this patient could walk, though in a tot- tering and insecure way. Vulpian l also describes a case which came under his own observation. A woman, dying at the age of sixty-nine, after twenty years in the hospital of La Salpetriere, was found to have suffered an entire atrophy of all the cortical gray substance of the cerebellum. This patient preserved great muscu- lar vigor, and could co-orclinate all the muscles ; but her "locomo- tion " was disordered and difficult. On the whole, then, it must be admitted that the evidence con- cerning the specific functions of the cerebellum of mammals, and especially of man, is not such as to warrant us in making definite affirmations. Scarcely a single case can be adduced in which it is not possible to maintain that the motor disturbances which fol- lowed lesion or excitation of this organ should be ascribed to an indirect effect upon contiguous organs. Yet the coincidence of evidence from several different lines gives sufficient support to the view that the functions of the cerebellum are in some way con- nected with the balancing, and therefore with the precise and se- cure locomotion of the body in space. More definitely, with refer- ence to the nature of this connection, it is not possible to speak confidently. No disturbance of the senses of hearing, of sight, or of muscular feeling, can be shown to follow injuries of this organ where other parts of the brain are not involved ; on the contrary, all these senses appear to have been perfect in certain cases of the complete absence of this organ. The only disturbance of sensi- bility which frequently follows affections of the cerebellum is ver- tigo ; the same symptom can be produced by passing a current of electricity through the back part of the head, or by the effusions of blood in this region which are sometimes occasioned by alcohol. Vulpian and others are, however, probably right in holding that the result is only indirectly to be ascribed to this organ. Indeed the view of Schiff has much in its favor : this view maintains that the aberration of motion due to lesion of the cerebellum should not be called a loss of co-ordination at all, since all the limbs may be moved in exactly the right relations necessary to carry the body forward or to maintain its equipoise ; but the precision of the mo- tion is impaired, because the nervous impulses from this organ that innervate the neighboring groups of muscles are not rightly adjusted to each other in amount along the different tracts. The 1 Le9ons sur la Physiologie, etc., p. 629. 156 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. balance of the innervating cells is destroyed ; and the result is a loss of nice adjustment of the amount of innervation sent to the particular muscles employed in equipoise and locomotion. It scarcely need be added that modern physiology distinctly dis- proves the hypothesis of Gall, who connected the sexual instinct with the cerebellum. There is no good evidence that the hinder brain directly participates in any way in those activities of the nervous system which are immediately correlated with psychical phenomena, whether of emotion, instinct, or intelligence. 22. The functions of only three other parts of the encephalon require consideration in this connection ; these are the corpora quadrigemina, the optic thalami, and the corpora striata. The crura cerebri and the pons Varolii are, as we have already seen, significant chiefly as organs of conduction. So far as they have also the intermediating functions of central organs, it is not possi- ble to treat of them otherwise than as concerned in that general reflex-motor mechanism which occupies all this region of the brain. 23. Experiments upon the Corpora Quadrigemina are rendered especially difficult by the small size and deep situation of these organs ; they cannot easily be exposed for stimulation without great effusion of blood, or subjected to lesion without extending the injury to contiguous parts. These difficulties render conclusions from the effect of stimulating or extirpating the corresponding organs (optic lobes) of the frog more than usually precarious. There is no doubt, however, as to some special connection between the corpora quadrigemina and sensory impulses of sight ; such con- nection is, then, of course, to be extended to those motor activities that are dependent upon the sensory impulses of sight. Flourens and many subsequent observers have found that one-sided extirpa- tion of the optic lobes of birds, or of the corpora quadrigemina of mammals, with the cerebral hemispheres intact, produces blindness in the opposite eye. The amount of this blindness is different in different animals, as the decussation of the fibres in the optic chi- asm is more or less complete in different animals. In the rabbit such decussation appears to be complete ; in the cat and dog in- complete. The fact that hemianopsia in both eyes is connected with disease of one side of the brain is an evidence that it is incom- plete in man also. Moreover, when the brain is removed in front of the corpora quadrigemina, and these organs left intact, the ani- mal can still guide and co-ordinate its motions in response to visual impulses. (We do not in this place consider whether we are war- ranted in calling these impulses " sensations " not to say "percep- tions" of sight.) These organs are, then, in some sort, central LESIONS OF THE CORPORA QUADRIGEMINA. 157 organs of sight. Since they are connected by nerve-tracts with the cortex of the cerebrum, motor innervation in response to stimulus from the optic nerve may arise either immediately in the corpora quadrigemina themselves or in the gray matter of the cortex. We may therefore suppose, with Wundt, J that destruction of the cere- bral substance abolishes only those movements of the muscles, in response to the stimulus of light, which involve complicated co-or- dinations with other excitations of sense, or with earlier established experience. It is scarcely allowable, however, to locate this special relation to visual impulses definitely in the substance of the corpora quadrigemina considered as isolated from the optic thalami, the optic tracts, and the gray matter at the floor of the third ventricle. There is sound sense in Eckhard's 2 remark that the functions commonly attributed to these bodies should rather be ascribed to the region in which they lie. The nates (or anterior pair) seem to be more especially connected with the sensory, and the testes (or posterior pair) with the motor activities of sight. Abnormal movements of a "forced " nature, and impairment of the power of co-ordination, follow the injury or extirpation of the corpora quadrigemina. These phenomena may be due in part to the loss of guidance by visual impressions ; but they are probably due chiefly to the extension of the effects of the injury to the crura cerebri and other surrounding parts. The optic lobes, according to Goltz, are the principal central mechanism for the croaking of the frog deprived of its hemispheres. Vulpian 3 makes a distinction between a merely reflex-motor cry and the plaintive utterance of an animal (e.g., the rabbit) which retains these organs and the pons Varolii. Ferrier, 4 however, was unable to make the distinction so clearly. The latter observer found that very marked phenomena such as dilating the pupils, clenching the jaws, retraction of the ears and angles of the mouth, extending the legs, etc. followed the stimulation of these organs with an electrical current, in the case of cats and dogs. But his experiments do not enable us to say how much of all this belongs to the specific function of the corpora quadrigemina as central organs, and how much to the irri- tation of the nerve-tracts in all the surrounding region. While we seem warranted in connecting these organs with the cerebellum, medulla, and pons, as concerned in the co-ordination of motions necessary for equipoise and locomotion, it is not safe at present to attempt a more precise localization of function. 1 Physiologische Psyehologie, i. , p. 184. 2 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 131. 3 Lemons sur la Physiologic, etc. , p. 541 f. 4 Functions of the Brain, p. 76. 158 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. 24. The office of the so-called basal ganglia Optic Thalami and Corpora Striata in that " projection-system " which connects the cerebral hemispheres with the periphery of the body, has already been spoken of; one chief function of these ganglia has usually been held to be that of acting the part " of middlemen be- tween the cerebral convolutions and the rest of the brain." 1 But they both have further functions as specifically central organs in co- ordinating the movements of the body according to impressions of sense. It is difficult, if not impossible, however, to define precisely what these functions are. Some special relation of the optic thalami to impressions of sight must be admitted. The fact that animals deprived of the cerebral hemispheres are capable of com- plex co-ordination of their muscles as reflex effects of visual im- pressions, seems to indicate that the mechanism of the optic thalami is associated with that of the corpora quadrigemina in performing this function. In mammals complete extirpation of the posterior portion of one thalamus results in permanent ex- pansion of the pupil of the opposite eye ; and Renzi was confident that injury of the upper surface of the anterior portion occasioned blindness. Lussana and Lemoigne found blindness in the opposite eye to be the invariable result of lesion of one thalamus. Cases of the disturbance of vision, or even of complete blindness, have been observed in human patients as the apparent result of disorgani- zation of this organ. It must be admitted, however, that the sig- nificance of the optic thalami for vision may be due simply to the fact that certain fibres of the optic nerve have their origin in it, and are rendered inoperative by injuring it. Experiments and pathological cases connecting the optic thalami with the sensations of smell and taste are more doubtful and conflicting. Ferrier 2 con- cludes that lesions in and around this organ destroy the cutaneous sensation of the opposite side of the body in the monkey ; Veyssiere found the same thing true in dogs. But Nothnagel found that no effect upon sensation followed the destruction of these organs in the rabbit. Not a few cases of disease of the optic thalami in man seem to point to some connection with tactile impressions ; other cases, however, are decidedly unfavorable to this view. On the basis of this rather meagre evidence Wundt 3 is willing to rest the theory that the optic thalami are special centres for the reflex- motions of touch ; by the same theory he also accounts for the dis- turbances of motion which follow injury to these organs. He 1 See Foster, Text-Book of Physiology, p. 653. 2 Functions of the Brain, pp. 238 ff. 3 Physiologische Psychologic, i. , p. 188. LESIONS OF THE STKIATE BODIES. 159 thinks it probable, nevertheless, that their function is not exhausted by this description. "Forced " positions and movements, and various other marks of impaired motor activities, follow the experimental lesion of these organs. But such disturbances largely or wholly vanish after a brief time, although they can be again called out by stimulation. They occur, as a rule, only when the lesion affects the posterior part of the thalamus, or the edges of the opening leading from above into the third ventricle. Most of the phenom- ena may be explained as due to the working of a mechanism that has been stimulated to abnormal activity by the mechanical irrita- tion due to the extirpation. 1 We can scarcely, then, be any more ex- plicit than to quote the remark of Vulpian, made some years since : 2 "We know nothing of the special functions of the optic thalami." 25. The special motor significance of the Corpora Striata is undoubted ; although we cannot go to the length of holding that these bodies are concerned only in the elaboration and downward transmission of efferent impulses. Ferrier 3 and others have ob- served that stimulating these bodies with an interrupted current produces strong convulsive movements of the opposite side of the body ; with a very powerful stimulus the whole side is drawn into an arch. No such effect could be produced by stimulating the optic thalami. Ferrier holds 4 that "in man and the monkey there is little, if any, difference perceptible between the complete destruction of the cortical motor-centres and destruction of the corpus striatum." Vivisection of this organ is sometimes followed by hasty forward running motions. Lesions of the striate bodies, in the case of the animals, are usually followed by laming of the limbs of the opposite side ; sometimes, however, no pathological symp- toms result. As a rule, in the case of man, paralysis of the arms and legs of the opposite side follows disease of these organs. Here, as elsewhere in this region of the nervous system, a certain sud- denness of the disturbance appears necessary to secure any marked result. Some experiments seem to point to a difference in the effects of injury to the two main nuclei of the corpora striata. Nothnagel asserted that all mechanical injury to the nucleus len- ticularis of one side results in laming of the opposite side : destruc- tion of this nucleus on both sides brings the animal into nearly the same condition as the removal of the cerebral hemispheres. But voluntary movements persisted after complete destruction of both the nuclei caudal i of the rabbit. 1 Comp. Eckhard in Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol. , II., ii., p. 125 f. 2 Lecons sur la Physiologie, etc. , p. 659. 3 Functions of the Brain, p. 161. 4 Ibid., p. 249. 160 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. There is much evidence, then, to show that the corpora striata are, as compared with the optic thalami, more especially connected with motor activities. Wundt l considers them to be pre-eminently significant as ganglia for the co-ordination of those motor impulses which are derived from the cerebellum and the cerebrum. The relative importance which they seem to have in the higher, as com- pared with the lower, animals (the monkey and man as compared with the rabbit, etc.) he thinks is like that of all the anterior por- tions of the brain ; such portions are in general, more significant in man than in the other animals. Wundt's view has considerable in its support among other things, the fact that, in case of lesions of the striate bodies, voluntary motions, or those motions whose motor innervation originates above these organs, seem to suffer most. But we positively must not adopt without qualification the statement a that the corpora striata are exclusively motor, and the optic thalami exclusively sensory. In addition to what has already been said (p. 129) to caution one against this view, it may now be added that numerous cases are recorded where injury, appar- ently confined to one corpus striatum, has resulted in loss of feeling on the opposite* side ; and other cases where disease, apparently confined to one optic thalamus, has caused loss of motion as well as of sensation. Moreover, the chief motor effects of injury to the striate bodies (if not all of them) may be due to the fact that the descending motor tracts are necessarily involved in the injury, rather than to any special motor function belonging to these bodies as a central organ. Another theory of the office of the striate bodies rejects entirely the view which regards them as in any true sense basal ganglia, with either specially motor or specially sensory functions ; and regards them as belonging to the cerebral hemispheres, rather than subordinate to the hemispheres in func- tion. 8 But inasmuch as this theory has its principal support, of a physiological kind, from a single case of an idiot's brain, in which these bodies were of nearly normal size, while the cortex was defi- cient in the motor regions and the base of the brain in general small, it can scarcely be regarded as sufficiently confirmed. 26. The researches of the last few years have tended to show that some special relation exists between the nervous substance of the organs lying at the base of the cerebrum, and the temperature 1 Physiologische Psychologie, i. , p. 193 f. 2 As propounded by Carpenter and Todd, and apparently adopted by Fer- rier, Functions of the Brain, 252 f. 3 See A. Hill, The Plan of the Central Nervous System, p. 276 ; and Jour- nal of Anat. and Physiol. , July, 1885. GRAY MATTER OF THE THIRD VENTRICLE. 161 of the body. The earlier observations ' pointed out the limits be- tween the medulla oblongata and the pons as a region, lesion of which was followed by a sudden and large rise of temperature. Still later, other observers ascribed vaso-rnotor functions to the optic thalami, 2 or asserted the existence of vaso-motor fibres in the crura cerebri (so Budge). In 1884, J. Ott pointed out that cutting the corpora striata is speedily followed by a marked rise of tem- perature. Yet more recently two experimenters, 3 working together, have arrived at certain conclusions based upon a large number of experiments, chiefly on rabbits, but also on guinea-pigs and dogs. They discover that, while the cortical substance can be subjected to the most severe and extended lesions without producing a fever- ish rise of temperature, puncturing the brain at the juncture of the sagittal and coronal sutures, down to the level of the striate bodies or deeper, invariably produces a marked rise of temperature. If the lesion only hits the striate bodies (especially the medial side, near Nothnagel's nodus cursorius) the coming-on of the fever is slow and gradual ; but if the needle is carried further toward the base of the brain, the fever springs up at once and reaches a max- imum in two to four hours. In what way these organs act as " fever-centres," or precisely what nervous elements are chiefly in- volved in the action, has not yet been made clear. 27. Eckhard 4 is inclined to lay down the law that in all verte- brates the mechanisms for a change of place lie rather in the ante- rior part of this general region corpora quadrigemina, etc.; while those for maintaining the upright posture and the equipoise of the body are localized in the region of the pons, cerebellum, and me- dulla oblongata. 28. It should be added that almost all observers have hitherto failed to attach sufficient importance to the central functions of the gray matter which lines the floor and walls of the third ven- tricle. Bechterew 5 has recently contributed the results of very important experiments to determine the specific function of this central nervous substance. He finds that frogs retain the function of balancing even when the optic lobes are crushed, if no injury is clone to the gray substance of the third ventricle or to the crura 1 By Tschetschichin, in Archiv. f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1866, pp. 151 ff . ; and Schreiber, Pfluger's Archiv., viii., pp. 576 ff. 2 Lussana and Christian! (No. 16 of the Verhandlungen d. physiolog. Gesell- schaft zu Berlin, 1883-84). 3 Ed. Aronsohn and J. Sachs: See Pfliiger's Archiv., xxxvii. (1885), pp. 232 ff. 4 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 138. 6 Pfluger's Archiv, xxxi. (1883), pp. 479 ff. 11 162 THE BRAIN AS A CENTRAL ORGAN. cerebri ; they lose this function, however, when a section is made into the third ventricle. Birds (hens and pigeons), also, show the same loss of function when a lesion is produced by running a very fine needle into the cavity of this ventricle. In the case of dogs, Bechterew considers himself able to localize the function of equi- poise precisely, and to point out the special effect of injury done to different definitely fixed localities. For example, bilateral lesion of the lateral or postero-lateral parts of the wall of the third ven- tricle results in the impairment or loss of equipoise and co-ordi- nated motion on both sides of the body : the lost function is re- gained only after a long time, and then but partial!} 7 . In none of these cases were any of the phenomena of motor laming of the extremities apparent, or any very marked disturbance of sensation. This gray matter of the third ventricle operates, Bechterew thinks, in connection with the olivary bodies for the co-ordination of motor impulses in response to sensations of touch, and with the semi- circular canals in response to sensations of sound. It is especially important also in equipoise through visual impulse connected with the changes in the axial direction of the eyes. Thus all the above- mentioned organs operate with the cerebellum as complex and correlated mechanisms for keeping the body balanced in response to changing sensory impulses. We stop at this point in our ascending review of the automatic and reflex-motor functions of the central mechanisms. For dis- tinctly psycho-physical and psychological questions the most im- portant of the activities of the nervous mechanism still await our examination ; these are the activities of the cerebral hemispheres. But nothing is known as to the molecular structure of these hemi- spheres, or as to their automatic and reflex-motor centres and activ- ities, which adds anything of importance to the description of the nervous system as a mechanism, or to the mechanical theory of its action. It is with such description and theory that we are now concerned. The correlations which exist between the structural condition, or physiological function of the nervous system, and the phenomena of mind, are chiefly (if not wholly) capable of study as illustrated in the cerebral hemispheres. But the nature of the nervous molecular machinery, and of its working as mere machinery, is understood, as far as our present information will permit, by an examination of the physiology of the spinal cord and of the inter- cranial ganglia lying below the hemispheres. As to the alleged psychical functions of these inferior organs we shall adduce further considerations when we come to consider such functions as belong- ing to the brain proper. CHAPTER Y. END-ORGANS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 1. IN order to understand the end-organs it is necessary to refer again to the place which they hold in the threefold arrange- ment of the nervous mechanism (compare Chapter II., 2). In the general division of labor among its organs, certain cells situated at the surface of the body become especially sensitive to external stimuli. The special function of these cells accordingly becomes that of receiving the action of such stimuli, of modifying this action in accordance with their own peculiar structure, and thus of set- ting up in the conducting nerves the neural process which is prop- agated to the central organs. It is obvious, then, that the struct- ure and grouping of the superficial cells must bear some definite relation both to the external stimulus and also to the nerve-fibres which convey inward the nervous impulse occasioned by it. The end-organs of sense may then all be described as special adapta- tions of the superficial cells to the different kinds of stimuli. With such special adaptations the peripheral terminations of the nerve- fibres must be connected. For the end-organs, as it were, look both outward and inward. They act as mediators between those different modes of external molecular motion which can occasion sensations in us, and the nerves which convey the results of this motion, when it has been changed into a nerve-commotion, onward to the central organs. 2. In the end-organs of the special senses the fibrils of the sensory nerves, as a rule, terminate in cellular structures which have the morphological significance of metamorphosed epithelial cells. The end-organs of smell and taste show this characteristic development most clearly. These end-organs are, in general, made up of cells which, posteriorly, pass into nerve-threads that are gathered to- gether into the sensory nerve of the special sense ; and which, an- teriorly, pass into conical or fusiform processes. The simplest type of an end-organ may then be described as follows : A hair-like pro- cess extending outward, and connected by a sensitive cell with a nervous filament extending inward. Such processes are probably 164 END-ORGANS OF SENSE. extremely sensitive to external stimuli ; and perhaps peculiarly so to the chemical changes which, at least in the case of three of the special senses (smell, taste, and sight), are their immediate excit- ants. All the end-organs of sense may be regarded as modifications of the type described above. Only a small part, however, of what are ordinarily called "the organs of the special senses" (e.g., the nose, the mouth, the ear, the eye, the skin) belongs, strictly speaking, to the nervous system. By far the greater part consists of me- chanical contrivances, designed to prepare the external stimuli and conduct to the true nervous apparatus the impulses they occasion. These non-nervous mechanical contrivances, however, modify the nature of the stimulus in so important a manner as to merit some brief description in our consideration of the nervous mechanism. 3. Besides the end-organs of sense, histology points out another kind of terminal apparatus. The efferent nerves, in order that they may stimulate the muscles, must have some special form of attach- ment to them. Special contrivances for connecting the motor nerves and the muscles are actually discoverable. We distinguish, then, two classes of end-organs : first, End-organs of Sense, and, second, End-organs of Motion. 4. Among the end-organs of sense, those of Smell have been least successfully investigated. That portion of the mucous mem- brane of the nose which clothes the upper region of the nasal cavity and is marked by a brown-yellow color the region of the expansion of the olfactory nerve is called " regio olfactoria ;" it contains the end-organs of smell. Here Ecker and Eckhardt (in 1855) discovered two different kinds of cells ; but we are indebted to Max Schultze for the first detailed description of them. The epithelial portion of the olfactory organ is supposed to be constructed upon the same type in all the vertebrate animals. Of the two kinds of cells which the last- mentioned investigator described, one is called " epithelial/' the other "olfactory." The epithelial cells are the larger, have an oval nucleus of considerable size, and extend through the whole epithelial layer. Their external half appears more or less cylindrical or columnar (at least in the Triton and Proteus), and is described by some observers ' as striated longitudinally. The form of the inner half of these cells is varied. The olfactory cells are spindle-shaped, with a large, round nucleus, and very long, fine processes. The external process is elongated into a stiff hair, at least in many cases, although Schultze considers that in man the olfactory cells have no cilia. 1 See Professor Babuchin in Strieker's Human and Comparative Histology, in., p. 207 f. THE REGIO OLFACTORIA. 165 These cells are surrounded by the epithelial cells. Most physiol- ogists follow Schultzein holding that the two kinds of cells are dis- tinct both in form and in function, and that only the " olfactory " cells are connected with the end-fibrils of the nerve of smell ; Ex- ner ' and others, however, believe that the distinction is not a fixed one. In his opinion the structure of one is merged into that of the other, and both are connected, though in a different manner, with the subepithelial net-work in which the fibres of the olfactory nerve are lost. The exact histological relation of the fibrils of the ol- factory nerve to the epithelium of the regio olfactoria is not yet made out. It is probable, however, that the finest of these fibrils, after pen- etrating the epithelial layer, closely embrace the large epithelial cells and enter into connection with the inner extremities of the olfactory cells. According to Exner, the fibres of the nerve do not pass over directly into the processes of the end-organ cells, but are lost in a net-work whose interstices are filled up with granules of nervous matter. The first pair of cranial nerves, the ol- factorius, which, as we have already seen on p. 84, is really a lobe of the brain itself, is the specific nerve of smell. 5. The contrivance for applying the stimulus to the end-organs of smell is very simple ; in gen- eral it is only necessary that a current of air, in which the stimulating particles float, shall be drawn through the nasal passages over the mu- cous membrane of the regio olfactoria. Even am- monia and camphor, when placed under the nos- trils, have no smell so long as the breath is held or drawn through the mouth. In quiet inspiration much the greater part of the cur- rent of air is conducted to the pharynx directly, and comparatively little reaches the ridge situated above the nasal dam at the back of the nose, where the end-organs of smell are placed. In full inspir- ation, and still more when short and deep draughts are drawn through the nasal passages, a considerable amount of the air is forced over the sensory parts. By snuffing we increase the amount of air drawn into the region by first creating a partial vac- uum in its cavity. In expiration the breathing passage is so located as to carry nearly all the air past the sensory parts without striking them. For this reason smelling is almost exclusively confined to J Sitzgsber. d. Wiener. Acad. , Ixiii. , p. 44 f . and Ixv. , p, 7 f . FIG. 40 Olfactory Cells and Epithelial Cells from the Mucous Mem- brane of the Nose. 60 %. (After Schultze.) 166 END-OKGANS OF SENSE. inspiration ; it has been disputed whether the current of expiration can be smelled at all. But Debrou showed that the odor of orange blossoms, when water tinctured with them has been drunk, can be detected in the expired air. The current which passes through the anterior part of the nasal passages seems to be the more impor- tant. This is probably the reason why the loss of the nose is so fre- quently attended with loss of the sense of smell. 6. The end-organs of Taste are situated in certain papillae, found on the upper surface of the root of the tongue, on the bor- ders and apex of the tongue, and in some cases on the anterior por- tion of the soft palate. These papillae of the tongue, are the papil- Ice circumvallatce and the papillcefungiformes. The lateral portions of the former are pre-eminently the regions of the mucous mem- brane of the tongue where the end-organs of taste are found. The same organs are also found more sparsely distributed in the fungi- form papillae. The circumvallate papillae are composed of connective tissue, which is invested by a pavement epithelium arranged in laminae. The epithelial layer is thinner than elsewhere at the sides of the papillae, in which the end-organs of taste (gustatory flasks or bulbs) form a zone that extends upward to about the level at which the papillae are no longer protected by their lateral wall. In the fungiform papillae the end-organs appear in the epithelium which covers their upper surface, and in the side surfaces. A. Hoffmann also found them in the papillae of the region of the soft palate. It is more doubtful whether they exist, as has been alleged, on the epi- glottis. The papillce jiliformes, which are sometimes classed with the two others, probably have nothing to do with sensations of taste. 1 Methods of experimenting to discover what surfaces are sensitive to taste are not easily made exact, because the stimulus must be in solution to excite the end-organs, and because the nature of the ex- citatory changes is chemical. There is scarcely a spot from the lips to the stomach which some physiologist has not described as be- longing to the organ of taste. But the regions where the above- described papillae, with their gustatory flasks, are found, are doubt- less the principal and probably they are the only sensitive surfaces. Considerable differences exist, however, among different species of animals, and even among different individual men es- pecially as to the sensitiveness of the tip and edges of the tongue, and of the anterior surface of the palate. All the evidence tends to show that the gustatory flasks are the sole end-organs of taste. 1 Comp. Brlicke, Vorlesungen iiber Physiologic, ii., p. 257; and von Vintschgauin Hermanns Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 147. THE GUSTATORY CELLS. 167 FIG. 41. Gustatory Bulbs from the Lateral Gustatory Organ of the Rabbit. 45 %. (Engelmann.) 7. The microscopic structure of the end-organs of taste is de- scribed in substantially the same way by all investigators, al- though these structures vary considerably, according to their position, and accord- ing to the different species of animals. In general they are like a glass knob with a short neck, and with its length somewhat greater than its greatest width. Hence they are called "gus- tatory knobs" or "bulbs" (so Henle), or, better, " gus- tatory flasks " (so M. Schultze). They occupy flask-shaped cavities of the epithelium, which they completely fill. Their lower or inner part rests on the connective tissue of the mucous mem- brane ; their upper and more slender part is surrounded by epithelial cells and has an opening, or pore, of from 4o ^ o6 to y^^ of an inch in diameter, at the surface of the epithe- lium. The margin of this pore is usually formed by placing several cells together, but sometimes by a single cell which appears perforated with a round hole. Each of the gustatory flasks consists of from fifteen to thirty long, thin cells, arranged like the leaves of a bud in closely com- pressed rows around the axis. All the gustatory flasks are composed of two kinds of cells : some are, essentially, epithelial cells, and have probably no direct connection with the nerves ; the others are highly differentiated structures, are probably directly continuous with the nerve-fibrils and are thought to be true gustatory cells. The epithelial or in- vesting-cells are long, narrow, spindle-shaped, bent, with a nucleus well marked ; the outward end is pointed, the central end branch- ing. The gustatory cells are thin, long, and highly refractive of light, with nearly the whole body of the structure occupied by an elliptical nucleus. The body of the cell is elongated into two pro- cesses, of which the upper or peripheral is tolerably broad and bears a short and fine point like a hair or pencil-point. This point FIG. 42. Transverse Section through a Papilla Circumvallata of a Calf. Showing the arrange- ment and distribution of the gustatory buib. 26 /j. (Engelmann.) 168 END-ORGANS OF TASTE. lies in a canal, in the epithelial layer, and rarely projects from the pore of the flask. The lower or central process of the cell is much attenuated, and usually divides into two branches. A direct con- Fio. 43. Isolated Gustatory Bulb, from the Lateral Gustatory Organ of the Rabbit, ^/j. (Engelmann.) Fio. 44. a. Isolated Gustatory Cells, from the Lateral Organ of the Rabbit ; 6, an Investiug and Two Gusta- tory Cells, isolated but still in connection. 6po / lt (En- gelmann.) nection of these processes with the fibrils of the gustatory nerve is assumed by all investigators. The manner in which the nerve-fibres terminate within the papillae is different in different animals. The glosso-pharyngeal nerve is the principal nerve of taste. It is distributed to the back of the tongue, enters the circum valla te pa- pillae, where it forms a minute plexus, interspersed with nerve-cells, from which both medullated and non-medullated fibres pass to the base of the gustatory flasks. The lingual branch of the trigeminus has also some claims to be, in a minor degree, a nerve of taste. Schiff l considers it as designed for sour taste, with a slight sensi- tiveness to bitter also. 8. In considering the end-organs of Touch, attention should be directed to the great variety of sensations which are grouped together under the word " touch," in the broadest meaning appli- cable to it. The question is thus raised whether any histological difference is to be detected in the nervous apparatus which may serve as a physical basis for the difference in the sensations. We may set aside for the present all consideration of the feelings of pain, of exertion and fatigue, and the so-called " common feeling " and "muscular sense." The question is thus reduced to this nar- row form : Can histology point out two specifically distinct kinds of end-organs in the skin, one of which serves for sensations of tem- perature, and the other for sensations of pressure ? 9. Histological examination shows that the sensory nerves dis- tributed to the skin the general organ of touch terminate in two 1 Molesch. Unters., X., p. 406 f., as referred toby von Vintschgau in Her- mann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 171 f. THE TACTILE CORPUSCLES. 169 * ways, either in free end-fibrils or in special constructions called "tactile corpuscles" or "end-bulbs" The different varieties, 1 all, however, essentially alike, of these special end-organs of touch have been named after as many different investigators. Their general office is that of modifying and multiplying the effect of the stimu- lus upon the nerve-fibres which terminate in them. The so-called " corpuscles of Pacini " were the first end-apparatus to be discovered in connection with the peripheral termination of the sensory nerves ; they were seen more than one hundred and fifty years ago by Vater. In man they are constantly present in the subcutaneous connective tissue of the palms of the hand and of the soles of the feet ; but are most numerous in the palmar surfaces of the fingers and toes, especially the third phalanges, although they occur in the neck, arms, etc. In some places they are visible to the naked eye as a minute grain of from -^ to J of an Z medullated nerve-fibres remarkably thickened. 2 Each corpuscle consists of layers of connective tissue, arranged concentrically and more closely packed near the centre ; these surround a cav- ity containing a soft nucleated mate- rial, into the interior of which the nerve penetrates. Here the nerve- fibre, having become a naked axis-cyl- * inder, appears to terminate in a little ., ,. * . .. ... .. . . . . bulb. Examination with the highest powers of the microscope shows that the axis-cylinder of the fibre is fibrillated, and that the terminal bulb consists of finely granular substance. Closely allied to the foregoing structures are the so-called " end- bulbs of Krause." These are small capsules of connective tissue in which nuclei can be detected. In them the nerve-fibrils of touch terminate either in a coiled mass or in a bulbous extremity. They are from ^ ^ to io * 00 of an inch in diameter, and exist in the con- 1 On the different kinds of terminal corpuscles, a principal monograph is by Fr. Merkel, Ueber die Endigungen der sensibleii Nerven in der Haut der Wirbeltliiere, Rostok, 1880. 2 So Biesiadecki in Strieker's Human and Comparative Anatomy, ii. , p. 232. Fre y-> . ne r ve with its sheaths ; &, system of tunics constituting the cap- sule of fch e corpuscle ; c, axial canal, in which the nerve-fibre ends. 170 END-ORGANS OF SENSE. junctiva of the eye, in the tongue, the lips, the floor of the buccal cavity, etc. The " corpuscles of Wagner " (or Meissner, who has furnished most of the details) may be described as oval-shaped bodies, made up of superimposed laminae and bearing some resemblance to a miniature fir- cone. The medullated nerve-fibres, like " creeping roots," wind beneath the cutane- ous papillae, and here and there penetrating them, terminate in the corpuscles. Within the corpuscles, according to KoUiker, the FIG. 46. End-bulbs from the -.. ., ., Conjunctiva of the Human tibl'llS lOl'm LWO Eye. (After Kolliker.) 1, ,, ., has two nerve-fibres which Or three COllS, form a coil within the end- -i / _TU- ;; bulb; a, has a fatty core, and finally join The nerve-fibre of 3 ends fno-p + lipr irt within in the form of a knot. l u b ei loops. These tactile end-organs are most constant and numerous in the terminal pha- langes of the fingers; they occur in smaller numbers on the palm and back of the hand, on the sole and back of the foot, and sometimes on the nipple, lips, etc. They are seated in the papillae of the skin. Meissner counted four hundred papillae in -fa of an inch square on the third pha- lanx of the index-finger, and found these corpuscles in one hundred and eight of them. Their long diameter lies in the direction of the papillae and extends from -j^ 7 to -j-J^ of an inch ; they are about jfa of an inch in thickness. 10. Since the surface of the skin is in general sensitive to press- ure and to temperature, it follows that the special structures de- scribed above as occurring in parts of this surface, cannot be the sole end-organs of touch. Modern histology has demonstrated the presence of an intricate plexus of non-medullated nerve-fibres which end in free extremities between the cells of the mucous layer. This terminal plexus of nerve-fibres is also the end-organ of so-called general sensibility and of touch. None of the attempts hitherto made to establish specific relations between the varieties in the structure of the tactile end-organs and the varieties of the sensations which they administer can be pro- nounced successful. Krause has tried to deduce from the construc- FIG. 47. Corpuscles of Touch. (After Frey.) a, from the soft skin of the duck's bill ; 6 and c, from the papillae of the tongue of the same animal. THE TACTILE CORPUSCLES. 171 tion of the corpuscles of Pacini their fitness to act as the end- organs of pressure ; but these corpuscles are wanting in many parts of the body that are sensitive to pressure. Wagner con- sidered the corpuscles which bear his name to be special organs of touch. But it has been shown by Merkel that these corpuscles are nothing but aggregates of more elementary forms, the so-called " tactile cells." Some have argued that the end-bulbs of Krause and the corpuscles of Pacini are the organs of general feeling (sensus communis) ; but others, with more probability, assign this function to the free nerve-endings ; while Merkel is of opinion that the latter are specifically concerned in sensations of temperature. Nothing is known on this point beyond the fact that the skin, within which the sensory nerve-fibres terminate, either in free ends or in special tactile corpuscles, is the organ for all the varieties of sensation brought under the most general meaning of the word " touch.' 2 The more precise manner in which the terminal fibres of the nerves of touch stand related to the individual tactile cells is also still in doubt. Some investigators consider that the fibres enter into the very protoplasm of the cells (Merkel, Frey) ; others that they spread themselves on end-plates superimposed on the cells (Eetzius, Ranvier). 11. With the exception perhaps of the ear, the Eye is by far the most elaborate and complicated of the end-organs of sense. This is true of those portions of it which are designed merely to bring the external stimulus to bear upon the nervous structure, as well as of this structure itself. Considering it as a whole, we may say that the peripheral organ of sensations of light and color is an optical instrument constructed on the plan of a water camera obscura, with a self-adjusting lens, and a concave, sensitive, nervous membrane as a screen on which the image is formed. 12. The eyeball consists of three coats or tunics inclosing three translucent refracting media. Since, however, the front part of the outer one of these coats is itself translucent and refracting, the number of refracting media in the eye is really four. (1) The first or external coat consists of two parts : (a) the Sclerotic or posterior five-sixths part ("white of the eye"), which is a firm, fibrous membrane formed of connective tissue intermingled with elastic fibres ; and (6) the Cornea, or translucent anterior one-sixth part, which is circular and convex in form, and covered with con- juuctival epithelium. The cornea rises and bulges in the middle like a watch-glass. (2) The second coat, or tunic of the eye, also consists of two parts : these are (a) the Choroid coat, which com- prises much its larger portion, is of a dark brown color, due to its 172 THE HUMAN EYE. pigment cells (except in the case of albinos), and is abundantly provided with nerves and blood-vessels ; and (6) the Iris, a circular, flattened, disk-shaped diaphragm in front of the lens (the colored part of the visible eyeball), bathed with aqueous humor, and hav- ing in its centre a circular aperture called the " pupil'' of the eye. The anterior border (corpus ciliare) around the iris consists of the JTov. c. \ - PI Pio. 48. Horizontal Section through the Left Eye. */i- (Schematic, from Gegenbaur.) ciliary muscle and the ciliary processes. (3) The Retina is the third or inner coat of the eye. It is a delicate membrane of ex- quisite transparency and almost perfect optical homogeneity ; it has a highly complex structure, consisting of nine or ten layers, the truly nervous portions of which contain nerve-fibres, nerve-cells, and special end-organs, together with connective tissue and blood- vessels. The inner surface of the retina is moulded on the vitreous THE FOUR REFRACTING MEDIA. 173 body, and it extends from the entrance of the optic nerve nearly as far forward as the ciliary processes. 13. The eyeball has four translucent refracting media. The first of these enumerating inward from the outside front is (1) the Cornea, already spoken of as the anterior one-sixth of the outer coat of the eye. (2) The Aqueous Humor fills the space between the cornea and the lens, and is divided by the iris into two chambers, of which the front one is much the larger. It is limpid and watery ; it holds in solution the salts of the blood- serum, with traces of organic substances. (3) The Crystalline Lens is situated between the iris and the vitreous body. It is a transpar- ent biconvex lens, with its antero-posterior diameter about one-third less than the transverse diameter. It consists of a capsule and in- closed body. It is of " buttery consistency," composed, like an onion, of a number of easily separable layers. Each layer consists of fibres which, within the layer are, as a rule, radial. Between the entire ciliary part of the retina and the corresponding part of the vitreous humor is interposed a structureless membranous body, to which the edge of the lens is attached, and which radiates out- ward and maintains the lens in tension. It is called the suspen- sory ligament, (or Zonula of Zinn) and its office is very important in the accommodating of the eye to different distances. (4) The Vitreous Humor consists of a number of firm sheets or layers (lamellse), between which fluid is contained, built into a body that is, optically considered, transparent and homogeneous. It occupies most of the space inclosed by the tunics of the eye. It is thought to be a gelatinous form of connective tissue, and is composed most- ly of water with salts in solution, of proteids and mucin, fats and extractive matters especially urea. Its peculiar structure is of little significance for the physiology of the eye. 14. Of the appendages or accessory parts of the eye such as the eyebrows, the eyelids, lachrymal apparatus, muscles of the eye- ball only the mechanism by which the eye is moved in its or- bit has any special significance for physiological psychology. The building-up of a world of visible objects, and even the forma- tion of a so-called "field of vision," is dependent upon the great mobility of the eye. The eyeball is moved in its bony socket, where it is embedded in a mass of fat as in a socket-joint, by six muscles, which are attached to it somewhat like the bridle to the horse's head. Four of these muscles spring from the bony wall near the point where the optic nerve enters, extend through the length of the socket and pass directly to the eyeball, where they are attached to it, one above, one below, one on the outer, and one 174 THE HUMAN EYE. on the inner side, (the recti ; intemus and. externus, superior and infe- rior). In moving both eyes up or down, the same muscles in both contract simultaneously ; in moving the eyes to the right, the outer fr FIG. 49. Muscles of the Left Human Eye, seen from above, rs, rectus superior ; re, rectus externus ; and rit, rectus internus ; os, superior oblique, with its tendon, , which runs through the membranous pulley, u, at the inner wall of the cavity of the eyeball. FIG. 50. Muscles of the Left Human Eye, seen from the outside. Ir, levator of the upper eye- lid, which covers the rectus superior, rs, re, os, as in the preceding figure ; rif, rectus inferior ; at, inferior oblique. muscle of the right eye and the inner of the left, contract simul- taneously (and vice versa) ; in turning both eyes inward to converge them upon a near object, the two inner muscles contract together. We cannot move the eyes so that the optical axes do not either meet or remain parallel ; we cannot look with one eye upward and the other downward, nor with one eye to the left and the other to the right ; nor can we voluntarily turn the eyes farther apart than when their axes are parallel. The other two of the six muscles of the eye are called oblique. Of these one is superior and internal ; it does not pass directly forward from its place of origin, at the posterior aperture through which the optic nerve enters to the eye, but first runs through a ring, then turns around, and is attached obliquely to the upper surface of the eyeball. The other oblique muscle begins at the inner wall in the socket, passes under the eye-ball, and is attached to it opposite to the superior oblique muscle. The two oblique muscles combine with the four recti to move the eyes in various directions which would be impossible for the latter alone. 15. The problem which is to be solved by the end-organ of vision may be stated in a general form as follows : A mosaic of localized sensations must be so constructed that changes in the quantity, quality, local relation, and sequence of these sensations THE FORMING OF THE IMAGE. 175 shall be quickly interpreted as indicative of the size, shape, lo- cality, and motion of external visible objects. The most important part of the solution of this problem falls upon the nervous struct- ure of the retina. It is itself a mosaic of nervous elements, the excitation of which may vary in quality, quantity, local coloring, and sequence of the different elements excited. But in order that the retina may exercise its function with the precision and delicacy of detail for which its structure fits it, the rays of light reflected from a single point of the surface of the visible object must excite a single one, or at most a small and definite group, of the retinal nervous elements. The sensations thus occasioned can then un- dergo a systematic arrangement by the mind. It is the work of the translucent refracting media of the eye to apply the stimulus to retinal elements exactly discriminated, and in an order correspond- ing to the object ; that is to say, the cornea, the humors of the eye, and the lens must form an image on the retina. To show the pos- sibility of this by calculating how the general laws of optics apply to the special structure of the eye, as anatomy describes it, and to make the calculations accord approximately with the facts, has been the labor of a number of investigators, especially of Helmholtz and his pupils. To the results of this labor only a brief allusion must suffice. 16. The four media of the eye constitute a system of refracting surfaces, each of which is separated from the one adjoining by a circular cut, as it were, in the whole refraction-substance. Espe- cially is this true of the lens with its concentric layers. The " image " formed upon the first member of this system of surfaces, by its re- fraction of such bundles of rays, from the object, as all lie in a plane at right angles to the axis of the system, thus becomes an " object '' for the second refracting surface of the system ; and the image formed by the second an object for the third ; and so on. The re- sult of any number of such refractions will accordingly always be an image whose points lie in a plane at right angles to the axis of the system of refracting surfaces, and which, as a whole, is in true perspective to the original object. The last image and the object are geometrically similar. In tracing the course of the rays of light through the refracting media of the eye, two things must be taken into the account : (1) the indices of refraction of these media, and (2) the geometrical form and position of all the limiting surfaces. (1) The means for attaining a knowledge of the former is by taking the average result of an examination of a number of eyes supposed to be normal. Fortunately for science, death has, for the first twenty-four hours, 176 THE HUMAN EYE. little or no effect in changing tbe indices of refraction of the eye. Krause ' found the mean index of refraction of the cornea to be = 1.3507, of the aqueous humor = 1.3420, of the vitreous body = FIG. 51 Median Section through the Axis of the Lens of the Eye. (Schematic, after Babuchin.) 1.3485. But Helmholtz (subsequent observers have agreed better with his result than with Krause's) found the two latter indices of refraction to be - 1.3365 and - 1.3382, respectively. The lens of the eye, espec- ially, is not homogeneous throughout as to its index of refraction. Each layer has its own index, and the amount of the index of each layer increases regularly toward the kernel of the lens. The work of refraction done by the lens is, there- fore, greater even than that which could be done by a homogeneous lens with an index of refraction equal to that of the no. 52,-view of the Lens in kernel, or most highly refracting part of Profile. /,. (After Arnold.) the lens. (2) The position and form of the separating surfaces of the re- fracting media can be only approximately determined in the living eye. Three of these surfaces are of chief importance the anterior surface of the cornea, and the anterior and posterior surfaces of the lens. The convexity of the first of these three is found to depart perceptibly from a sphere ; it is greater toward its edge than at its vertex, where it resembles rather a section of an ellipsoid. The advantage of such a shape is seen in the fact that the images 1 Krause's experiments refer to rays of the wave-length to which the bright- est place in the solar spectrum corresponds ; that is, to the place at the end of the first third, or quarter between D and E. The refraction-index of water for these rays he assumed at =1.33424. THE PROCESS OF ACCOMMODATION. 177 formed when the pupil is expanded are thus made sharper than they could otherwise be. No observable refraction takes place on the posterior surface of the cornea, because the difference between the indices of refraction of the cornea and of the aqueous humor is so slight that the faint images from this surface vanish by proxim- ity to the stronger ones refracted from the front part of the cornea. 17. The power of altering the refracting conditions of the eye, so as to enable the media to form a single perfect image on the retina, for varying distances of the object, is called its power of " accommodation " or adjustment. Plainly such adjustment of the eye cannot take place, like that of a camera obscura, by changing to any appreciable extent the distance of the lens from the screen on which the image is formed. It must therefore take place, either \)j increasing the indices of refraction of the media of the eye, or by increasing the curvature of one or more of the refracting surfaces. It is now known to be due to changes in the convexity of the lens, principally, if not wholly, of its anterior surface. The posterior apex of the lens remains unmoved. There are several methods of experiment which demonstrate that in accommodation for near dis- tances the front of the lens becomes more strongly arched. When accommodation is taking place, the pupil may be seen not only to contract, but also to draw its edge forward. Helmholtz calculated the amount of this forward movement for two cases at about ^ and -g^ of an inch, respectively. Moreover, by an ingenious contrivance the image reflected from the anterior surface of the lens may be watched as it becomes smaller and more distinct on adjustment for near distances, thus showing that the surface from which it is reflected has increased its curvature. It is obvious that the mechanism for adjusting the eye must be under the brain's control, since adjustment is voluntary ; and that it must consist of muscles which lie within the eyeball. The ac- cepted hypothesis concerning the nature and action of this mechan- ism was first proposed by Helmholtz. This investigator assumes that the lens, when the eye is at rest, does not have the form which corresponds to a condition of equilibrium in its own elastic power. If it were not held in by its surroundings, it would be more arched than it is both before and behind. But it is kept flattened by the radial tension of the suspensory ligament ; when this tension is with- drawn the lens becomes curved by the action of its own elasticity. The withdrawal of the tension is accomplished by the action of the ciliary muscle, the fibres of which have their point of fixation at the edge of the cornea, and run from here in the direction of a merid- ian toward the equator o fthe eye. When the ciliary muscle con- 12 178 THE HUMAN EYE. tracts, the free ends of its fibres are drawn toward its fixed ends on the edge of the cornea ; the radial tension of the suspensory lig- ament is thus relaxed, and the lens is allowed to assume its natural form under the equipoise of its own elastic forces. Conjunctiv Corneae Proc. ciliarix radiarer circularcv Ciliarmitslcel FIG. 53. Sectional View of the Connections of the Cornea, Ciliary Muscle, Ciliary Processes, etc. 10 /,. (Gegenbaur.) The occulo-motor nerve furnishes the fibres that serve the ciliary muscle ; these fibres run in the posterior strands of its roots. Their central place of origin is in the posterior part of the floor of the third ventricle ; stimulating the front division of this part produces accommodation of the lens ; stimulating the back division of the same part produces contraction of the pupils. Stimulation still further back, where the third ventricle passes into the aqueduct of Sylvius, produces contraction of the internal rectus muscle of the eye ; and the innervation of this muscle is, of course, regularly con- nected with adjustment for near distances. Thus all the mechan- ism of accommodation, both that of the central organs and that of the end-organs, is made to work together for the production of an image upon the retina. 18. Given the formation of the image upon the retina, it is fur- ther required in order to vision that this physical process should be changed into a physiological process. We now examine briefly the mechanism by which such a change is accomplished. [The reader is referred to the larger specific treatises for the detailed theory of the schematic, the emmetropic, the myopic, and the ^hy- permetropic eye.] The retina, or inner tunic of the eye, contains the nervous elements by whose action the system of refracted rays THE LAYERS OF THE RETINA. "179 is changed into a mosaic of nerve-commotions. But light does not act as a stimulus to the nervous substance, either fibres or cells, unless it have an intensity which is nearly deadly to that sub- stance. Since we are able to see the feeblest rays of the moon as reflected from white paper, the nervous excitation which is the con- dition of vision cannot be produced by the direct action of light on the nerve-fibres or nerve-cells of the eye. A photo-chemical sub- stance and process, as well as a special end-apparatus, seems there- fore to be necessarily involved in the problem which is given to the retina to solve. 19. The nervous and other elements of the retina are arranged Outer surface. 10 10 Layer of pigment cells. 9 . . . Layer of rods and cones. & Membrana limitans externa. | 7 Outer nuclear layer. f .... Outer molecular layer. .... Inner nuclear layer. * Inner molecular layer. Layer of nerve-cells. IQ^F * Layer of nerve-fibres. Membrana limitans interna. _ , -^ ^ . ' - Inner surface. FIG. 54. Diagrammatic Section of the Human Retina. (Schultze.) in the following ten layers, counting from within outward and backward : (1) the membrana limitans interna, which is the retinal 10 Fia. 55. Diagrammatic represen- tation of the Connections of the Nerve - fibres in the Eetina. (Sehultze.) The numbers have the same reference as in Fig. 54. THE HUMAN EYE. border toward the vitreous body ; (2) the layer of optic nerve-fibres distributed from the papilla where this nerve breaks in through the tunics of the eye ; (3) the ganglion-cell layer ; (4) the inner molecular layer ; (5) the inner nuclear layer ; (6) the outer molecular layer ; (7) the outer nu- clear layer ; (8) the membrana limitans externa ; (9) the bacillary layer, or layer of rods and cones ; (10) the pigment-epithe- lium layer. The membranes (Nos. (1) and (8)) are not really uninterrupted layers, but an extremely fine network. By no means all the retinal substance is nervous. Indeed, the numerous radial fibres ( fibres of Mailer) which seem to penetrate its entire thickness are now held to be in great part elements of the sup- porting tissue ; moreover, the whole con- nective substance is a kind of sponge-like tissue, in the gaps of which the true ner- vous elements lie embedded. The gaps thus filled are especially large in the second, third, fifth, and seventh layers. A description of the undoubtedly ner- vous elements of the retina includes the following particulars : (a) The retinal fibres of the optic nerve lie parallel to the surface, are non-medullated, and extreme- ly fine ; in general, they are arranged in ray-like bundles, radiating on all sides from the place of the entrance of the nerve. The arrangement is special at the yellow spot, so as to surround, and not cover it. This nerve-fibre layer is thickest at the papilla of the retina, and diminishes continuously from this spot toward the ora serrata ; at about one-third of the distance it becomes single, (b) The gan- glion-cells, which form the principal part of layer No. 3, like the multipolar cells of the rest of the cerebro-spinal system, have one large process of more trans- THE LAYER OF RODS AND CONES. 181 lucent appearance. This process subdivides into fibrils of vanishing fineness, that enter and are lost in the next layer. At the yellow spot these cells are eight or ten deep ; from this centre they dimin- ish toward the ora serrata, where spaces are found between the cells, (c) The nervous elements of the inner molecular layer (No. 4) are not clearly made out. They probably consist of extremely fine filaments, which are connected with the external processes of the ganglion-cells, (d) Most of the nucleus-like bodies of the inner nuclear layer (No. 5) are probably nervous. Each such body has two processes one directed inward, the other outward. The former is thought to be connected with the filaments of the inner (No. 4), and the latter with those of the outer (No. 6) molec- ular layer, (e) In the outer molec- ular layer (No. 6) are nervous fila- ments, like those in No. 4, which are probably connected with the external processes of the inner nuclear layer. Here are also found numerous star- shaped cells probably not nervous. (f) In the outer nuclear layer (No. 7) the undoubtedly nervous elements preponderate. Each nucleus-like body in this layer is connected by a radial fibre with one of the nervous elements of the rod-and-cone layer (No. 9). These nuclear bodies are called rod-granules and cone-granules respectively, and are to be distin- FIG. 56. Diagrammatic Section of the in i i -, ,-t . . Posterior Part of the Retina of a Pie. guisned, not only by their connection *oo/ v - 7, part of outer nu- with these elements, but also by ^I^JffSST HT3C their size and position ; the latter are %S^*i^^;WJ^ larger, and lie on the more external fra , ctile bod y. the function O f which is ' unknown. side of the layer, (g) The layer of rods and cones (No. 9) consists of a multitude of elongated bodies arranged side by side, like rows of palisades, with their largest ex- tension in the radial direction. These bodies are of two kinds one cylindrical, and called "rods of the retina," the other rather flask-shaped, and called "cones of the retina." The rods extend the entire thickness of the layer, and are about 3-^0 inch in length, but the cones are shorter ; the rods are about T ^ 00 inch in diameter, the smallest cones of the central depression 10 ^ 00 inch. The inner ends of both are continuous with the rod-fibres and cone-fibres of the outer nuclear layer. 182 THE HUMAN EYE. Each rod or cone is composed of an inner and outer segment or limb ; the latter is highly refractile, the former only feebly so. The inner limbs appear under the microscope like a mass of pro- toplasm. The appearance of a most delicate longitudinal line in the inner and outer segments has led to the belief that a nerve- fibril is, as it were, drawn through their axis. The description FIG. 57. Rods and Cones of the Human Retina. (Schultze.) A, showing inner segments of the rods, s s s, and of the cones, z z'; the latter in connection with the cone-nuclei and fibres as far as the outer molecular layer. 80 %. 2?, inner segment of a cone with a cone-nucleus. 120 % . C, isolated interior portion of a cone. PIG. 58. Rod and Cone from the Human Retina, preserved in perosmic acid, showing the fine fibres of the surface and the different lengths of the internal segment. 1000 /,. (Schultze.) The outer seg- ment of the cone is broken into disks which are still ad- herent. of the two shows that there is no essential anatomical difference between the rods and cones ; nor are we able to distinguish any difference in their physiological significance. The distribution of the two elements is different for different parts of the retina. In the yellow spot only cones appear, but these are of more slender form, and of increased length, so that not less than one million are supposed to be set in a square ^ inch ; ' while not far from this 1 See Le Conte, Sight, p. 58. New York, 1881. YELLOW SPOT AND BLIND SPOT. 183 FIGS. 59 and 60. Superficial Aspectof the Arrangement of the Rods and Cones in the Retina. 50 %. (Schultze.) The former is from the region of the macula lutea ; the latter from the peripheral region. spot each cone is surrounded by a crown-shaped border of rods. Toward the ora serrata the cones become continually rarer. In close connection with the rods and cones stand the cells of the pigment-epithe- lium. These cells form a regular mosaic of flat, six- sided cells, which send out pigmented processes be- tween the outer limbs of the rods and cones. The fibres of the optic nerve are supposed to be connected with the rods and cones by means of the ganglion- cells, and of the radial fibres in which the granules of the outer and inner nuclear layers are embedded. 20. Two minute portions of the inner surface of the retina re- quire to be distinguished from the rest of its area ; the yellow spot (macula lutea) and the " blind spot " (papilla optica). The yellow spot is of oval shape, about ^ of an inch in its long diameter, and has in the centre a depression called tbefovea centralis. It is the place of clearest vision, and the physi- ological centre of the eye. About J- of an inch inside the eye from the middle of the yellow spot is the middle of the papilla, or place where the optic nerve breaks into the retina. The blind spot, or portion of the retina which can be experimentally shown to be inoperative in vision, has been proved by Helmholtz to corre- spond in both size and shape to that covered by this papilla. Its diameter is about ^ or -fa of an inch, varying considerably for different eyes. It is wanting in all the nervous elements. 21. In answer to the question, What elements of the retina are directly affected by the light ? both anatomy and physiology refer to the layer of rods and cones. This layer alone possesses that mosaic nervous structure which appears to correspond to the de- mands made upon the end-apparatus of vision. It can be demon- FlG. 61. Equatorial Section of the Right Eye, showing the Papilla of the optic nerve, the Blood-vessels radiating from it, and the Macula lutea. 2 /i- (Henle.) S, sclerotic; Ch, choroid ; and R, retina. 184 THE HUMAN EYE. strated that the waves of light pass through the structure of the retina, and that the nervous process must begin in the back part of this structure. Indeed, it is possible, by an experiment (devised by Purkinje), to perceive with one's own retina the aborescent figure formed by the shadow of the blood-vessels expanded upon its front part. 22. We have already seen (Chapter I., 14, 15) that a chemi- cal process may reasonably be conjectured to accompany the action of the nerves in general. Undoubtedly a photo-chemical process is concerned in vision. But after all the careful researches of many observers, especially of Ktihne ! and his pupils it is difficult to point to any results of chemical investigation which serve better to define the exact nature of the physiological action of the end-or- gans of the eye. The relation of the light to any chemical pro- cesses which may take place in the gray substance of the retina can be only indirect. The opto-chemical hypothesis must, therefore, regard the epithelial cells, with which the end-fibrils of the optic nerve are in physiological connection, as the bearers (Tr tiger) of cer- tain photo- chemically decomposable materials or visual substances (Sehstoffe) ; these substances, however, cannot excite chemically the irritable part of the visual cells the protoplasm of the inner limbs of the rods and cones without being themselves decomposed. Visual substance is necessarily some kind of matter easily decom- posable by light, or chemically sensitive to light. The first process, then, in the excitation of the optic nerve, is the decomposition by the light of some substance found in certain epithelial elements of the retina. The second process is the action, as visual excitants (Sehreger), of the decomposition-products of the epithelial cells upon the protoplasm of the end-organs. But in order that such decomposition-products may act as excitants of the end-organs of vision, the visual substance must be rightly placed that is, it must be in local connection with the protoplasm of the outer limbs of the rods and cones. The relation of the two last layers of the retina is such as to secure this necessary connection. We are as yet unable, however, to say what are the visual substances which the successful working of the opto-chemical hypothesis demands. The location of the pigmentum nigrum, and the changes produced in it by light, favor the conjecture that this substance is of the most fundamental and general importance for visual sensations. Visual purple may also be supposed to be a visual substance. The fact that light of different wave-lengths effects changes in this pig- 1 The few statements here given are taken for the most part from the article of this investigator in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., pp. 235 ff. PIGMENTS OF THE EYE. 185 raent with different degrees of speed, suggests the view that it is related to the susceptibility of the eye for different colors. But since invertebrates do not have the visual purple ; since the cones (a thing which no one doubts) see without this purple, and since the rods of some animals, such as hens and doves, and the rods of the ora serrata, perform their functions without it, this pigment can scarcely be said to be the only visual substance. The opto-chem- ical hypothesis, then, seems to require several colored visual sub- stances. Moreover, since animals can see with bleached retinas, and albinos have the power of vision, we are compelled to assume also a colorless visual pigment. As to the nature of the chemical changes necessary to be produced in the protoplasm of the outer limbs of the rods and cones by the action of the decomposition- products of the visual substances, we are quite ignorant. 23. The end-organ of hearing is the Ear. But in this case, as in that of the eye, a very large part of the apparatus of sense is sig- nificant simply as a contrivance for applying the stimulus to the true end-organ, to the differentiations of epithelial cells and nervous cells connected with the terminal fibrils of the sensory nerve. The entire human ear consists of three parts, or ears ; namely, the -ex- ternal ear, the middle ear, or tympanum, and the inner ear, which is also called the " labyrinth," from its complex construction. I. The External Ear exclusive of the cartilaginous plate which is extended from the side of the head consists of (a) the concha, a deep hollow, and (6) the external meatus, or passage leading from the bottom of this hollow to the drum of the ear. The concha is prob- ably of little or no use in sharpening our perceptions of sound ; for if a tube be inserted so as to secure a canal for the air to the drum of the ear, the entire concha may be filled with wax, and the result is to increase rather than diminish the sharpness of the sound. It is possible, however, that vibrations of more than one thousand in a second are concentrated by reflection ' from the con- cha. The external ear appears to be of some service in perceiv- ing the direction of sound. Rhine's experiments seem to show that as Harless 2 thought the cartilage of the ear can be thrown into sympathetic vibration with certain acoustic waves, and so re- inforce the sound. At best, however such work done by the con- cha is small. The most patent office of the external meatus is the protection of the ear-drum ; the passage is so curved that the drum cannot be 1 See Hensen, Physiologie d. Gehors, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 23. 2 Article Horen, in Wagner's Handworterbuch d. Physiol., IV,, 1853. 186 THE HUMAN EAR. reached from the outside in a straight line. Helmholtz called at- tention to the fact that certain tones of a high pitch resound strongly in the ear when the meatus is of normal length, but cease so to resound when its length is increased artificially. The rneatus probably, therefore, modifies certain tones by its own resonant action strengthening the high ones, and deadening the low, in some degree. Various simple experiments such as placing a resounding body in contact with the teeth prove that the surrounding cranial bones conduct sound to the ear. It is probable, however, that the path of such conduction is not, for the most part, as was formerly sup- posed, directly to the inner ear by way of the cranial and petrous bones, but indirectly, through the ear-drum and bones of the middle ear to the fenestra ovalis. The amount of direct conduction pos- sible, has not as yet been determined precisely. 24. II. The Middle Ear, or Tympanum, is a chamber irregu- larly cuboidal in form, and situated in the temporal bone, between the bottom of the meatus and the inner ear. Its outer wall is (a) FIG. 62. Drum of the Right Ear with the Ham- mer, seen from the inside. 2 /i- (Henle.) 1, chorda tympani ; 2, Euslachian tube ; *, ten- don of the tensor tympani muscle cut off close to its insertion ; m a, anterior ligament of the malleus ; M c p, its head ; and II 1, its long process. S t p, Spina tympanica posterior. Chorda tyin.an.i FIG. 63. Side Wall of the Cavity of the Tym- panum, with the Hammer (M) and the Anvil ( J). The former phows the connection of its handle with the drum. T, Eustachian tube. 8 /,. (Gegenbaur.) the membrana tympani, which consists of three layers an external tegumentary, an internal mucous, and the intermediate membrana propria, composed of unyielding fibres arranged both radially and circularly. In the inner wall, which separates the tympanum from the labyrinth, are two openings or windows the fenestra ovalis, which corresponds to the vestibule of the labyrinth, and the fenestra rotunda, which corresponds to the tympanic passage in the cochlea. Near its anterior part the tympanum opens into (b) the Eustachian THE THREE AUDITORY BONES. 187 tube, a canal which communicates with the nasal compartment of the pharynx. (c) The auditory bones are three in number, called Malleus, Incus, and Stapes, and arranged so as to form an irregular chain stretched across the cavity from the outer to the inner wall of the tympanum. The malleus has a head, separated by a constricted neck from an elongated handle ; its handle is connected with the centre of the membrana tympani ; its head articulates with the in- cus. The incus has a body and two processes. On the front sur- face of the body is a saddle-shaped hollow, in which the head of the malleus fits ; the short process is bound by a ligament to the posterior wall of the tympanum ; the long process ends in a rounded pro- jection (os orbiculare) through which it articulates with the stapes. The stapes, or stirrup-shaped bone, has a head and neck, a base and two crura. The head articulates with the incus ; from the constricted neck the two crura curve inward to the base, which is attached to the fenes- tra ovalis. These bones are moved on each other at their joints by (d) two or three small muscles the ten- FIG. 64. Bones of the Ear, as seen in their SOT tvmpani, the StapediuS. and, more connection from in front. /i- (Henle.) , , , n ,, T . mv J Incus (anvil), of which Ib is the short, doubtfully, the laxator tympani. The and II the long, process ; c, its body, and /> , , . , T . , . , pi, the process for articulation with the nrst OI tliese IS inserted into tne stapes (processus orbtcularis.) M, Malleus malleus, near the root, and serves to JKBttf J^S^-KS tighten the tympanic membrane by jgSjJj* 8tapes (8tirrup) ' with it3 drawing the handle of the malleus inward ; the stapedius is inserted into the neck of the stapes, but its function is doubtful apparently it draws the stapes from the fenestra ovalis, and so diminishes the pressure of the chain of bones in that direction. The laxator tympani is inserted into the neck of the same bone, and its action has been supposed by some to be antagonistic to that of the tensor tympani ; but its muscular character is now denied by most observers. 25. The general office of the tympanum may be described as that of transmitting the acoustic waves to the inner ear, while at the same time modifying their character. Some modification is neces- sary in order that these waves may occasion such vibrations in the elements of the inner ear as shall be adapted for the excitation of its end-organs. The acoustic motion of the molecules of air, in the 188 THE HUMAN EAE. form in which it reaches the ear-drum, has a large amplitude, but a small degree of intensity. This motion must be changed into one of smaller amplitude and greater intensity ; and it must be trans- mitted, with as little loss as possible, to the fluids of the labyrinth. The transmitting vibrating media must also have the power of an- swering to the different tones of any pitch perceptible by the ear. The description of the manner in which this apparatus of membrane and bones solves so complicated a mechanical problem belongs to the physics of anatomy ; it has been worked out with great detail by Helmholtz and others, although certain points still remain un- solved. We can here only indicate one or two particulars. A flat membrane, evenly stretched, whose mass is small in pro- portion to the size of its superficies, is easily thrown into vibration by the impact of acoustic waves upon one of its sides. Such a membrane responds readily to tones which approach its own funda- mental tone ; but if divergent tones are sounded the membrane is unaffected. A motion which consists of a series of harmonious partial tones cannot then be repeated by such a membrane in the form in which the air brings it. If, then, the membrane of the tympanum were not so arranged and connected as to have no pre- ponderating tone of its own, it could not be the medium of our hearing a great variety of tones. The property of taking up with the -vibrations, as it were, of a large scale of tones is secured for the tympanum by its funnel-shaped form and by its being loaded. It is contracted inward into a depression of the right shape by means of the handle of the hammer ; it is therefore unequally and only slightly stretched, and has no fundamental tone. It is also load- ed with the auditory bones, which deprive it of every trace of such a tone and act as dampers to prevent long-continued vibrating. Moreover, since the apex of its funnel bulges inward, the force of the vibrations from all sides is concentrated in vibrations of greater intensity in the centre, where it is spent in setting the chain of ear- bones in motion. The acoustic vibrations of the auditory bones, which are occa- sioned by the movements of the ear-drum, are not longitudinal, but transverse ; they do not, however, resemble the vibrations of a stretched cord or a fixed pin. They do not vibrate by reason of their elasticity, but like very light small levers vibrating as a sys- tem, with a simultaneous motion around a common axis. Direct observation of these bones in motion shows that their sympathetic vibrations vary greatly for tones of different pitch and similar in- tensity, from a scarcely observable motion to a surprisingly great elongation. THE EUSTACHIAN TUBE. 189 The effect of the muscles of the tympanum upon the transmis- sion of tones of different pitch is not as yet clearly. demonstrated. In general, the stretching of the tensor muscle, within the limits which have thus far been investigated, seems to weaken the higher much less than the lower tones. But the tension of the drum un- der the influence of this muscle does not indicate the slightest change on passing from low to high tones. The stretching of the tendon of the stapedius muscle has no observable influence on the acoustic vibrations of the tympanum. 26. The Eustachian Tube, when in its normal position, is neither closely shut nor wide open. Its office is to effect a renewal of the air in the tympanum, to maintain the equilibrium of atmospheric pressure on both sides of the tympanic membrane, and to convey away the fluids which collect in the tympanic cavity. If it re- mained open, so as to permit the acoustic waves of the air from the mouth to enter, our own voices would be heard as a roaring sound, and the passage of air inward and outward during respiration would affect the position and tension of the tympanic membrane. That it is opened, however, on swallowing, Valsalva proved two centuries ago. For if we keep the nose and mouth closed and then swallow, with the cheeks blown violently out, a feeling of press- ure is felt in the ears and the hearing is weakened. These effects are due to the forcing of the air through the Eustachian tube into the tympanic cavity. The tube is thus of indirect service in re- spect to the physiological functions of the middle ear. 27. III. The Internal Ear, or Labyrinth, is the complex organ in which the terminal fibrils of the auditory nerve are distributed and the end-organs of hearing situated. It lies in a series of cav- ities channelled out of the petrous bone. It consists of three parts the Vestibule, the Semicircular Canals, and the Cochlea. In each osseous part a membranous part is suspended, corresponding to it in shape, but filling only a small portion of the bony cavity which contains it. It is in the labyrinth that the acoustic waves trans- mitted by the tympanum are analysed and changed from a physi- cal molecular process to a nerve-commotion, by the special end- apparatus of hearing. (A) The Vestibule is the central cavity of the internal ear ; it is the part of the labyrinth which appears first in animals and is most constant. The membranous vestibule is composed of two sac-like dilatations the upper and larger of which is named utriculus, the lower sacculus. In its outer wall is the fenestra ovalis ; its anterior wall communicates with the scala vestibuli of the cochlea, and at its posterior wall the fine orifices of (B) the Semicircular Canals open 190 THE HUMAN EAR. into the utriculus. These canals are three in number, are bent so as to form nearly two-thirds of a circle, and are about an inch in length and fa of an inch in diameter. They are called the supe- No. 1. No. 2. No. 3. FIG. 65. No. 1, Osseous Labyrinth of the Left Ear, from below ; No. 2, of the Right Ear, from the inside ; No. 3, of the Left Ear, from above. (Henle.) Av, aqueduct of vestibule ; Fc. fossa of the cochlea ; Fee, its fenestra (rotunda) ; Fv. fenestra of the vestibule (ovalis) ; ha, external ampulla ; h, external semicircular canal ; Tsf, tracing spiralia foraminosus ; vaa, ampulla of the superior semicircular canal ; vc, posterior semicircular canal ; and vpa, its ampulla. nor, the posterior or vertical, and the external or horizontal canals. The contiguous ends of the superior and posterior canals blend to- gether and have a common orifice into the vestibule. They all Ls FIG. 66. Osseous Cochlea of the Right Ear, ex- posed from in front. 4 /j. (Henle.) t, section of the division-wall of the cochlea ; ft, upper end of the same. Fee, Fenestra ; H, hamulus ; Md, modiolus ; Ls, lamina spiralis. FIG. 67. Cross-section through the Acoustic Nerve and the Cochlea. /,. (Henle.) Nc, nerve of the cochlea ; Nv, nerve of the vesti- bule ; St. scalsi tympani ; Sv, scala vestibuli ; and between them the ductns cochlearis, DC. Ls and Md, as in preceding figure. have a regular relative position, their planes being at right angles to each other. Near the vestibule they dilate to about twice their average diameter and form the so-called ampullae. Both the osseous STRUCTURE OF THE COCHLEA. 191 vestibule and the osseous canals contain a fluid (the perilymph), in which the membranous vestibule and canals are suspended ; the membranous labyrinth is also distended with a similar fluid (the endolymph). (C) The Cochlea is by far the most complex part of the laby- rinth ; it is about J of an inch long, and is shaped like the shell of a common snail. It, too, consists of a membranous sac embedded in the osseous cavity. The whole passage of the cochlea is imperfectly divided into two canals by a partition-wall of bone, which is wound 2J times around an axis (the modiolus), from the base to the apex, somewhat like a spiral stair-case. It is called the osseous lamina spiralis. Of the two canals or passages thus formed, the one which faces the base of the cochlea is called the scala tympani ; since it has its origin in the cir- cular aperture (fenestra rotunda) w T hich leads to the tympanic cavity. The other, which faces to- ward the apex, opens into the vestibule, and is called the scala vesti- buli. At the apex of the cochlea these two scake communicate with each other through a small hole (helicotrema). The division of the mem- branous cochlea is com- pleted by a membrane (the basilar membrane, or membranous spiral lamina), which bridges the interval between the free edge of the osseous spiral lamina and the outer wall of the passage ; it is attached to this wall by the spiral ligament. Another membrane (the membrane of Reissner) arises from a spiral crest (limbus, or crista spiralis) attached to the free edge of the osseous lamina, and extends to the spiral ligament, so as to form a small aqueduct between it and the basilar membrane (the scala intermedia, or ductus cochlearis, or canal of the cochlea). It is in the vestibule, in the ampullae of the canals, and in the scala intermedia that the nervous end-organs of hearing are to be found. 28. The auditory nerve, on approaching the labyrinth, divides into a vestibular and a cochlear division. The former enters the vestibule and subdivides into five branches one for the utriculus, one for the sacculus, and one for each of the three ampullse. In Liffamentuia spiral* Stria vasculari* Lamina basilaris FIG. 68. Section through one of the Coils of the Cochlea. 20 /j. (Schematic, from Gegenbaur.) 192 THE HUMAN EAR. each of these dilatations the membranous wall forms a projecting ridge, called the crista acoustica. The endothelial investment of the crista is elongated into columnar cells, intercalated between which are fusiform cells. Each of the latter, according to Max Schultze, and others, has the peripheral and the central process with which we are already familiar in the nerve-cells of other end- organs of sense. The peripheral process projects into the en do- lymph as an auditory hair ; while the central extends into the subendo- thelial tissue where the nerve-plexus of the audi- tory nerve ramifies, with the terminal branches of which it is probably con- tinuous. According to more recent observers (Retzius and others) the auditory hairs are con- nected with the columnar cells, and do not project into the endolymph, but into a soft material of in- distinctly fibrillar struct- ure. The inner surface of the epithelium of the crista is thus clothed with a thick- set " wood " of these hairs. Max Schultze found their length to be inch their ul- timate ends, however, be- ing too fine to discriminate. Calcare as particles, called "ear- stones " (otoliths) appear in both sacc a and utricle, embedded in a soft matrix and lying in contact \v A th the nerve-epithelium. In the vestibule the hair-like prolongations of the epithelial cells are more scanty than in the ampullae. 29. The terminal nerve-apparatus of the cochlea is even far more complicated and remarkable. The cochlear branch of the auditory nerve pierces the axis of the cochlea (modiolus) and gives off lateral branches which pass into the canals of the osseous spiral membrane. Here they radiate to the membranous spiral lamina, and are connected with a ganglion of nerve-cells ; beyond the gan- Fio. 69. Scheme of the Nerve-endings in the Ampullae. (After Rudinger.) 1, membranous wall of the ampullae, with a structureless border. 2 ; through which the nerve- fibre, 3, sends its axis-cylinder, 4 ; 5, plexiform connection of the nerve-fibres ; 6, auditory cells ; 7, supporting cells ; oVjont, -~ 8, auditory hairs. THE OEGA^ OF COETI. 193 glion they form a plexiform expansion, from which the delicate fibrils losing their medullary sheath and becoming extremely fine axis-cylinders pass through a gap in the edge of the lamina into the organ of Corti. The connection of their ultimate fibrils with the cone-cells of this organ may be assumed, but is difficult to demonstrate. The organ of Corti is situated on that surface of the basilar membrane which is directed tow r ard the ductus cochlearis. Its structure is a wonderful arrangement of cells. Some of these cells are curved, elongated, and placed in two groups an inner and an outer. They are called the "rods," or "pillars," or "fibres of FIG. 70. Organ of Corti in the Dog. 800 / 1 . (Waldeyer.) b c, homogeneous layer of the basilar membrane ; w, its vestibular layer ; , its tympanal layer ; d, blood-vessel ; f, nerves in spiral lamina ; ff, epithelium of spiral groove ; h, nerve-fibres passing toward inner hair-cells, i, k ; /, auditory hairlets on inner hair-cells ; I ^, lamina reticularis ; ra, heads of the rods of Corti jointed together ; the inner rod seen in its whole length ; the outer one broken off ; n, cell at base of inner rod ; p, q, r, outer hair-cells ; s, a cutioular process probably belonging to a cell of Deiters ; , lower ends of hair-cells, two being attached by cuticular processes to the basilar membrane ; w, a nerve-fibril passing into an outer hair-cell ; e, a sustenticular cell of Deiters. Corti." The cells of the inner group rest by a broad foot on the inner part of the basilar me'i ''brane, project obliquely forward and outward, and expand into a x - "lated head ; the cells of the outer group rest in the same way, *fifcline forward and inward, and fit into a depression in the head of the cells of the inner group. The two thus make a bow, which arches over an exceedingly minute canal (the canal of Corti) formed between them and the basilar membrane. These rods of Corti increase in length from the base to the apex of the cochlea. The basilar membrane is composed of fibres arranged in a transverse direction, so that each rod rests upon one, or upon a pair of these fibres. Internal and almost parallel to the inner group of rods is a row of compressed conical 13 194 THE HUMAN EAR. cells with short and stiff hair-like processes (inner hair-cells). External and almost parallel to the outer group are four or five rows of hair-cells (outer hair-cells) which are attached to the basilar membrane, while their other extremity projects as a brush of hairs through the reticular membrane (membrane of Kolliker). This latter membrane is a very delicate framework, perforated with holes, through which the hairs of the outer hair-cells project, and which extends from the inner rods to the external row of hair- cells. It acts as a support for the ends of these cells. The inter- val between the outer hair-cells and the spiral ligament is occupied by cells of a columnar form (the supporting cells of Hensen). The organ of Corti is covered over and separated from the endolymph of the ductus cochlearis by the so-called membrana tectoria. 30. The problem before the labyrinth of the ear is in part the same as that solved by the tympanum, namely, the problem of con- veying the acoustic waves to the true end-apparatus of hearing. The repeated shocks of the stirrup at the fenestra ovalis and per- haps, in far less degree, the pulsations of air at the fenestra ro- tunda produce waves in the fluid of the labyrinth. Any mole- cular oscillations of this fluid, thus occasioned, cannot, however, act directly as the appropriate stimulus of the sensations of sound. Since the dimensions of the whole mass thrown into vibration are so small in comparison with the length of the acoustic waves that the extension of the shock from the stirrup would be practically instantaneous throughout, and since the surrounding walls may be regarded as absolutely immovable by any such impact, the laby- rinth-water would act as an incompressible fluid. It would, there- fore, be unsuitable for the transmission of various kinds of acoustic waves. But different parts of the labyrinth are capable of yielding to the waves in the fluid caused by the repeated shocks of the stirrup. Four such places, into which, as they yield, the fluid of the labyrinth can retreat (as it were) are designated by Hensen ; ! these are the two openings of the aqueduct of the vestibule, the mem- branes of the aqueduct of the cochlea, the pores of the blood-vessels in the bone, the membrane of the fenestra rotunda by bulging out into the tympanic cavity. Impulses started in the fluid of the labyrinth would thus result in its movement back and forth, so as to produce a friction of the end-apparatus. This friction would be increased by the action of the otoliths, or minute calcareous particles, found in the fluid. Thus the waves started at the fenes- tra ovalis would be diffused over the vestibule and into the scala vestibuli of the cochlea, where they would flow to its head, being 1 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 106. THE ANALYSIS OF SOUNDS. 195 prevented by the separating membrane from entering the scala tympaui. To what extent these waves flow through the helico- trema, or small hole at the apex of the cochlea, into the scala tym- pani, and what are the exact relations between the waves in this latter scala and those in the scala vestibuli cannot be stated con- fidently. Nor can the exact part of the basilar membrane at which the excitation of the end-organs by the oscillations of the structure begins, be indicated with certainty. This membrane is, however, undoubtedly thrown into vibration through the unequal pressure of the moving fluid ; and by its vibration it excites the nervous structures with which it is intimately connected. 31. A still more difficult problem for the labyrinth to solve may be described in one word as a problem of "analysis." The inner ear is not, indeed, contrived so as to reproduce changes in the form of the acoustic oscillations, as such, after the manner in which these changes can be made apparent to the eye or to touch. But all our analogies for the analysis of composite tones the " clangs " or musical notes of ordinary experience are derived from the process of sympathetic vibrations. "We are led, then, to inquire whether any part of the structure of the ear is capable of enough such sympathetic vibrations to account for the experience which we have in recognizing all the possible degrees of pitch in the scale of musical sounds. The structure must also be such as to receive the impressions produced by a number of simultaneous tones, com- posing a harmony. Moreover, it must be such as to represent tones that follow each other in rapid succession, as do the notes of a melody. The sympathetic vibratory apparatus of the labyrinth must therefore cease its vibrations immediately upon the cessation of the sounds in sympathy with which it vibrates. In other words, it must either have a damper, or be so constructed as to return at once to a state of rest without such a damper. It must be capa- ble of being thus excited, and of returning to a state of rest, no fewer than five hundred times in a second, since the crackling of electric sparks, between which the interval is no more than .002 of a second, can be heard as distinct noises. Still further, the end- apparatus of hearing must suffice for all kinds of noise, as distin- guished from musical tones ; and it is extremely difficult to see how the same apparatus which serves for the analysis of the clang can also suffice for all the various sensations of noise. The manner is not known in which the auditory hairs and stones and cells of the vestibule and ampullae, and the rods of Corti, the fibres of the basilar membrane, and the conical hair-cells of Dei- ters, in the cochlea, actually discharge the required functions. The 196 THE HUMAN EAR. structure of the end-apparatus in the vestibule and semicircular canals is plainly not adapted to the analysis of musical tones. The otoliths found in the vestibule, and the hairs of the ampullae, are not capable of regular sympathetic vibrations ; moreover, they form no scale of structures corresponding to the scale of sensations of tone. This fact has led to the assumption that these organs are designed to act as the end-organs of noise instead of musical sound. The more complicated structures of the ductus cochlearis do seem, on the contrary, to be adapted for the required analytic functions. It was first argued by Helmholtz that the bows formed by the rods or fibres of Corti are enough in number to constitute such a scale of structures that this work of analysis can be assigned to them. Some three thousand of these fibres, arranged in rows upon the basilar membrane like the keys of a piano-forte, if distributed over seven octaves would give about thirty-three for a semitone. They might then be supposed to be elastic ; and since they differ in size, to be tuned for particular sounds, so that the sympathetic vibration of each one of them corresponds to the sensation of a given tone. But the rods of Corti are stiff and not easily vibratory ; and their office is probably simply to constitute a support for the hair-cells. Moreover, birds, which are undoubtedly capable of ap- preciating musical notes, have no rods of Corti. Hensen has shown * that the basilar membrane is itself in a good degree graded to pitch ; its continuous structure and expansion in size from the beginning to the end of the ductus cochlearis en- courage the assumption that its individual radii act like stretched strings to respond to the different tones, from the lowest to the highest. The calculations of Helmholtz have tended to confirm the view of Hensen. It is assumed, then, that the parts resting upon this membrane would be moved up and down, and that the excita- tion of the conical hair-cells with which the terminal fibrils of the auditory nerve are supposed to be connected is thus brought about. The number of the acoustic cells is claimed to be about great enough to correspond to the demands made upon the organ which shall be instrumental in the physical analysis required as a basis for the sensations of musical tones. The claim is at best doubtful. As Hensen himself remarks, 2 the possibility is by no means excluded that the working of this complicated and delicate ap- paratus may be altogether different from that conjectured by all such theory. In other words, the physiology of the peripheral mechanism of hearing is as yet in a very incomplete and unsatisfactory state. 1 Zeitschrift f. wiss. Zool., XIII., p. 481 f. a In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 104 f. END-OKGANS OF MOTION. 197 32. A brief description of the End-Organs of Motion, or motor end-plates, will suffice for our purposes. In general, the termina- tions of the efferent nerves are connected either with electrical organs (as, for example, in the torpedo), or with secretory glands, or with the muscular fibre. We consider only the last of these three cases. After an efferent nerve has entered the substance of the so-called voluntary or striated muscle, it subdivides among the individual muscular fibres, separating these fibres from each other. Such nerve-twigs usually lose their medullary sheath, and their axis- cylinder splits up into fibrils, whose exact mode of termination has been much debated. It appears now to be demonstrated (by Kiihne, Margo, Kouget, and others) that the axis-cylinder itself pierces the sarcolemma or sheath of the muscular fibre ; that the neurilemma becomes continuous with the sarcolemma ; 1 and that the fibrils, into which the axis-cylinder divides, form a flat, branch- ing mass within certain peculiar, disk-shaped bodies situated inside the sarcolemma, and called "motor end-plates." In the non-striated (or non-voluntary) muscles, the nerves divide and subdivide to form more and more minute plexuses of nerve-fibres, which are distrib- uted in the connective tissue that separates the muscular fibres from each other. The exact relation between this extremely minute in- tramuscular network of fibrils and the nuclei of the cells of mus- cular "fibre " is not yet made out. The shape and structure of the motor end-plates are different for different animals, and even for different muscles of the same ani- mal. Indeed, the mode of the termination of the motor nerves in the muscle appears to be somewhat distinctive of the different parts of the muscular structure. Sometimes the axis-cylinders are somewhat enlarged, with strongly granular corpuscles attached or adjacent. Sometimes a granular mass with its nuclei forms a kind of base or floor for the terminal nerve-fibres ; and this eminence may be elongated, elliptical, or circular. But the character and variety of these forms are of no particular interest to psychology, even as approached from the physiological point of view. 1 The question of histology is debated, whether the neurilemma actually becomes continuous with the sarcolemma. Strictly speaking, according to Kiihne, it does not ; but then, strictly speaking, it is not continuous with it- self. It is, as we have seen (p. 36 f), divided by the annular constrictions into members which are separate structures. It is to be considered as fringed out on its edge and cemented to the sarcolemma. [See on this subject the monograph, Die Verbindung d. Nervenscheiden mit dem Sarkolemm, Sepa- ratabdruck aus der Zeitschrift fur Biologie, by Kuhne.] CHAPTEK VI. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NERVOUS MECHANISM. 1. THE life of the individual man, so far as it can be made an object of immediate observation and scientific description begins as an un differentiated germ, without apparent distinction of bodily organs or of physical and psychical activities. This living germ undergoes a development. Before it can be subjected to ordinary inspection it has unfolded itself into an elaborate organism ; and, in its normal relation to the other systems of this organism (mus- cular, respiratory, metabolic, reproductive, etc.), the nervous system has acquired all its complex mechanism, consisting of an indefinite number of parts. What are the different stages of the development of this nervous system, and what are the laws according to which its different factors and organs become differentiated, it belongs to the science of Embryology to describe. But it belongs to psychology to make such doubtful inferences as suggest themselves concerning the psychical activities that are to be ascribed to the unfolding mind of the embryo. Psychology, indeed, attempts in such a case to form a picture of those earliest and most obscure mental states, the elements of which can no longer be reproduced or recombined in the developed consciousness of the adult. To this fact is due, in part, the doubt which clings to all such inferences. But this doubt is also due to the fact that embryology itself is so incomplete, even in respect to its possession of single facts, and yet more in- complete in respect to its power to set forth any system of general truths and laws. Our knowledge of all the earlier states and changes of con- sciousness is wholly a matter of the interpretation of states and movements of the bodily organism, in terms of our own conscious mental experience. If, then, it were found that certain physical states and motions of the human embryo need for their interpretation the assumption of preceding or accompanying mental states, we should have the right to carry our psychological principles back to the life of this embryo even back to its beginning in the undif- ferentiated germ from which the whole development proceeds. THE TWO-FOLD PROCESS. 199 But as the case now stands, the proper physical science cannot claim to have furnished us with the requisite description of these antenatal-physical movements and states. Little use for the main purposes of Physiological Psychology, therefore, can be made of facts accessible as to the embryonic development of man. We might even seem warranted in passing by the whole subject with two or three general observations like the following : The two-fold life of man, both nervous mechanism and mind, begins in what is apparent only as a physical unity, in that system of moving mole- cules which constitutes the living germ. Out of this unity, and in indissoluble connection with it, the two-fold human life then pro- gressively develops. The mechanism unfolds itself, increases the complexity of its molecular activities, runs its course of changes, and is broken up again into its material elements. The mind manifests itself in primitive activities, unfolds itself, increases the complexity of its psychical life, and then ceases to make itself known through the physical mechanism, when the mechanism itself is dissolved. And all the while the molecular mechanism and the mind are most closely and mysteriously correlated in their development as a to- talit}', and in their particular activities. But in spite of the fact that embryology furnishes psychology with scanty material for any extended and trustworthy conclusions with regard to the earliest activities and development of the mind, at least a sketch of its principal outlines, so far as the nervous sys- tem is concerned, seems desirable. Of knowledge from direct ob- servation concerning the early development of the human embryo there is exceedingly little. Yet the comparatively few facts which are indisputably known, throw considerable light upon the nature and functions of the human nervous mechanism. Moreover, in cer- tain most important particulars there is good reason to believe that the earliest history of the development of the embryos of other animals is substantially like that of the human embryo. The very first things in the life of the chick or better, one of the mammals for example, may be described as probably holding good in all important respects for the life of man. And when those differences which are most strikingly human begin plainly to appear, they show what parts of the nervous system are most worthy of em- phasis as distinctively connected with man's mental life. 1 2. The immature ovarian ovum of the common fowl like that 1 The following description is taken to a large extent, and in some places almost verbatim, from Foster and Balfour's Elements of Embryology, London, 1883, and F. M. Balfour, Comparative Embryology, vol. ii., pp. 177 ff., Lon- don, 1881. 200 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. of every other animal presents the characters of a simple cell. It is seen to consist of a naked protoplasmic body which contains in its interior a nucleus (the germinal vesicle) and within this a nucle- olus (the germinal spot). It is enclosed in a capsule of epithelium, called the "follicle," or "follicular membrane." As the ovum ma- tures, the body of it grows in size and a number of granules make their appearance in the interior ; while the outermost layer of the protoplasm remains free from them. But as the granules grow larger in the centre, other granules appear also in the periphery of the ovum. The germinal vesicle, during the growth of the ovum, travels toward the periphery where the protoplasm surrounding it remains comparatively free from granules. Accessory germinal spots make their appearance. The cells of the follicular membrane, which were at first arranged in a single row, now become two or more rows deep ; and, whereas the immature ovum is naked, its superficial layer is now converted into a radiately striated mem- brane. Still later, a second membrane appears between this striated membrane and the cells of the follicle ; and the former disappear- ing as the ovum approaches maturity, the second membrane (called the "vitelline") remains alone. Other changes which take place after the ovum has ripened and has been discharged into the ovi- duct, it is not necessary to describe. They result in the formation of the accessory parts of the egg. The only essential constituent of the body of the ovum is an active living protoplasm. 3. Impregnation takes place in the upper portion of the oviduct, and consists in the entrance of a single spermatozoon into the ovum, followed by the fusion of the two. The spermatozoon itself may be considered as a cell, the nucleus of which is its head. On entering the ovum, the substance of its tail becomes mingled with the protoplasm of the ovum ; while the head enlarges, moves to- ward and fuses with a part of the substance of the ovum, thus constituting the nucleus of the impregnated egg. In this manner the physical and mental peculiarities of both parents are trans- mitted or carried over to the offspring by means of the actual fu- sion of substance derived from the bodies of both. 4. A process known as segmentation or "yolk-cleavage" follows the fecundation of the ovum. This process consists in a succes- sive division of the ovum into a number of cells, from which all the cells of the full-grown animal are, as it were, the lineal descendants. This process has many variations among the different animals. The chief peculiarity among the mammals is that the whole mass of the yolk is subject to this change. By segmentation the germinal disk of the ovum is broken up THE OVARIAN OVUM. 201 into a large number of rounded segments of protoplasm, called the blastoderm. Of these segments those that lie uppermost are smaller than those beneath. The beginning of the two layers into which the blastoderm divides is thus made. The behavior of the nucleus formed by the union of substance from the male and the female, during the process of segmentation, has not been so satisfactorily traced ; it appears probable, however, that a process of division goes on in it also. Other nuclei, thought to be derived from the primi- tive nucleus, make their appearance immediately below the blasto- derm. The distinction between the upper and lower layers of the blastoderm now becomes more obvious, for the segments of the former arrange themselves side by side, with their long axes vertical, as a membrane of columnar nucleated cells ; while those of the latter continue granular and round, and form a close, irregular net-work of cells, whose nuclei are not easily seen. 5. The principal difference between the ovum of a mammal and that of a bird depends upon the amount and distribution of the food-yolk. The ovum of the mammal is small the human ovarian ovum being only from T!T ^ liir ^ an i ncn in diameter because it contains so little food-yolk ; but this small supply is dis- tributed uniformly throughout. In con- sequence of the above- mentioned difference, PIG. 71. FIG. 72. the OVUm is able to FIGS. 71 and 72. Fructified Human Egg of 12-13 days, seen lf<1r- ir^4-/T. from the surface and the side. In the centre of the former is reaK Up into Seg- what Reichert considers the embryonic area. ments through the whole of its protoplasmic mass. As the process of segmentation goes on, the differences among the ova of different species of ani- mals become more clearly marked. For example, in the rabbit, although the details are differently described by different observers, at the close of the process of segmentation the ovum appears to be composed of "an outer layer of cubical hyaline cells, almost en- tirely surrounding an inner mass of highly granular, rounded, or polygonal cells." In a small circular area, however, the inner mass remains exposed. The outer cells soon close over the exposed spot (called by van Beneden, blastopore), and thus form a superficial layer. A narrow cavity then appears between the two layers, which extends so as to separate them completely, except in the 202 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. region near to the spot originally exposed. The enlargement of the ovum and of the cavity together, soon give the whole structure the appearance of a vesicle with a thin wall and a large central cavity. This vesicle is called the blastodermic vesicle. The greater part of its walls is composed of a single row of outer flattened cells ; while an inner lens-shaped mass of cells appears attached to FIG. 73. Vascular Area and Embryonic Area of the Embryo of a Rabbit, seven days old. 28 /!, (Kolliker.) o o, the vascular or opaque area : ag, embryonic area ; pr, primitive streak and groove ; rf, medullary groove. a portion of the inner side of the outer layer. The " blastodermic vesicle " enlarges rapidly ; its inner mass of cells loses its lens-like shape, becomes flattened, and spreads out on the inner side of the outer layer. Its central part remains thicker and forms an opaque circular spot on the blastoderm, which is the beginning of the area where the embryo is to form (the embryonic area). 6. The immediately subsequent history of the development of the mammalian ovum, until the appearance of the so-called "primi- tive streak," is less perfectly understood : Foster and Balfour ' speak of the following description as " tentative." In the embryonic area the cells of the inner mass become divided into two distinct strata, an upper one of rounded cells which lies close to the flattened outer layer, and a lower one of flattened cells (the " hypo- 1 Elements of Embryology, p. 316 f. THE THREE GEEMINAL LAYERS. 203 blast"). The former becomes fused with the outer layer, and thus gives rise to a layer of columnar cells (the " epiblast "). In this way the embryonic area consists of two layers of cells ; the upper one of which is the epiblast, and the under one the hypoblast. The blastoderm at first, then, consists of only two layers, which constitute a double-walled sac (the gastrula) ; but a third layer soon makes its appearance between the other two. These three layers epiblast, mesoblast, and hypoblast are called " germinal layers " and are found in the embryos of all forms of vertebrate, and most forms of invertebrate animals. The middle one, or meso- blast, arises from certain parts of the other two primitive layers, in a manner which need not be described. From these three germi- nal layers, all the different parts of the organism of the animal are developed. The history of the development of every animal in its earlier stages is, therefore, a narrative of the changes which take place in the three layers of the blastoderm. The hypoblast is the secretory layer ; and from it almost all the epithelial lining of the alimentary tract and its glands is derived. The mesoblast is the source of the skeletal, muscular, and vascular systems, and of the connective tissue of all the parts of the body. But it is the epiblast which produces the central and peripheral nervous system, the epidermis, and all the most important parts of the organs of sense. It is to the development of the epiblast exclusively, then, that we now direct our attention. 7. The process of differentiating the layers of the embryo is intimately connected with another, which results in forming a FIG. 74. Primitive Streak of the Embryo of a Rabbit, eight days and nine hours old. 220 /,. (Kolliker.) No medullary groove has yet been formed, ax, primitive streak: pr, primitive groove ; #/, primitive fold ; ect, ectoderm (or epiblast) ; mes, mesoderm (or mesoblast) ; ent, en- toderm (hypoblast). structure known as the primitive groove. This process is substan- tially alike in mammals and in birds. A short sickle-like thickening of the blastoderm, which afterward becomes a " narrow strap-like opacity" due to a forward propagation (linear proliferation) of 204 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. epiblast cells in a straight line arises near the junction between the pellucid and the opaque areas of the blastoderm, and stretches inward upon the embryonic area ; it is called the primitive streak. The median line of the primitive streak then shows a shallow fur- row, running along its axis. This furrow is called the primitive groove. (Compare Fig. 73.) 8. Now occurs the formation of the medullary groove. In that portion of the embryonic area which is in front of the primitive streak, the axial part of the epiblast thickens ; two folds arise along the boundaries of a shallow median groove ; the folds meet in front, diverge behind, and then enclose between them the front part of the primitive streak. These are the medullary folds, and they constitute the first definite features of the embryo. The part bounded between these folds is called the " medullary plate ; " its supreme impor- tance in the embryo appears in the fact that it is the portion of the epiblast which gives rise to the central nervous system. At about the time of the development of the medullary groove (a little earlier) an important change is taking place in the constitution of the hypoblast in front of the primitive streak. An opaque line ap- pears, as seen from the surface, and is continued forward from the front end of the streak, but stops short at a semicircular fold near the front part of the pellucid area. This fold is the future head- fold of the embryo. The opaque line is due to a concentration of cells in the form of a cord ; it is the beginning of what is known as the notochord. It is to subsequent changes in connection with the notochord that we are to look for the development of the distinct- ively vertebral structure of the animal. 9. From this point onward the shaping of recognizable parts of the embryo proceeds rapidly. The pellucid area, which was at first quite flat or slightly curved, has, in the process of its growth, suffered a " tucking in" as it were of a portion of the blasto- derm, in the form of a crescent. It is this tuck which, when viewed from above, appears as a curved line marking the margin of the medullary groove. Thus the blastoderm is at this spot folded in the form of the reversed letter Z ; the fold is the one already re- ferred to as the "head-fold." Of the two limbs of this 3-fold, the upper is continually growing forward and the lower is contin- ually growing backward. As the head-fold enlarges rapidly, the crescentic groove becomes deeper ; and at the same time, the over- hanging margin of the groove rises up above the level of the blasto- derm. The medullary folds meantime increase in height and lean over from either side toward the middle line. They soon come in contact in the region which will afterward become the brain, and FIRST CEREBRAL VESICLE. 205 thus form a tubular canal (the medullary or neural canal), although they do not for some time coalesce. As the upper limb or head of the embryo becomes more prominent, the medullary folds close rapidly, and, in the region of the head quite coalesce. The open medullary groove is thus converted into a canal or tube, which is closed in front but remains open behind. The front end of this V7; FIG. 75. Fore-part of an Embryo-chick at the end of the second day, viewed from the Dorsal Side. /,. (Kolliker.) V h. fore-brain ; A b /, occular vesicles; J/A, mid-brain ; H A, hind- brain ; H, part of the heart seen bulging to the right side; Vom, vitelline veins; Mr, medullary canal, spinal part ; M r', medullary wall of the mid-brain ; U u>, proto-vertebral somites. FIG. 76 Embryo of a Rabbit, eierht days and fourteen hours old. 22 ' 7 /i (Kalliker.) ap, pellucid area ; , anterior edge of the circuit of the head ; A', fore-brain ; h" ', region of later mid-brain ; h fff , position of the hinder brain ; A, position of the heart ; rf, medullary groove ; rw, medullary ridge ; uw. meso- blastic somite; pz, lateral zone ; stz, vertebral zone. neural canal having a more rapid growth than the rest dilates into a small bulb or vesicle, the cavity of which remains continuous with that of the rest of the canal, while its walls are similarly formed of epiblast. This bulb is the so-called first cerebral vesicle ; and the lateral processes which soon grow out from its sides are called optic vesicles. Behind the first vesicle, a second, and afterward behind the second vesicle, a third is soon formed. Thus these three brain-buds, 206 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. Mid-brain Plexus chorioides or germinal brains, are made. At the level of the hind end of the head, two shallow pits appear (the auditory pits) which are the rudi- ments of the organ of hearing. Thus the closing-up of the medul- lary canal has converted the original medullary groove into a neural tube ; and three cerebral vesicles have been grown which are to develop into the fore-brain, the mid-brain, and the hind- brain. 10. The most important changes which now take place in the development of the nervous mechanism, are connected with the growth of the three cerebral vesicles and with the flexure of the medullary canal. The front portion of this canal-^that is, the fore-brain with its vesicles in consequence of inequalities of growth in the different parts of the brain, be- comes bent downward ; this is the commence- ment of the cranial flex- ure. As the flexure pro- gresses, the front portion becomes more and more folded down, so that the second vesicle, or mid- brain, comes to project in front of it. From the front part of the fore- brain the vesicles of the cerebral hemispheres grow out and swell lat- erally, so as to make two buds corresponding to the two hemispheres of the brain. Each of these side-buds has a cavity which is continu- ous behind with the cavity of the fore-brain ; each cavity becomes a lateral ventricle of the brain. The original vesicle of the fore-brain, having ceased to occupy its front position, is developed into the parts surrounding the third ventricle. In the hind-brain, or third cerebral vesicle, the part nearest to the mid-brain becomes marked off by a constriction ; the hind-brain is thus separated into two parts the rudimentary cerebellum with the pons in front, the rudimentary medulla oblongata behind. 11. Various differentiations of the lining of the epiblast, which is involuted along the cerebro-spinal cavity, take place. Through the length of the neural canal this lining is thickened at each Communica- tion oflat-. eral ventri- cles Plexus chorioidc Foramen Monroi N. opt. Infundi- bulum N. trig. Fia. 77. 4, Brain of an Embryo of the Rabbit. B, Brain of an Embryo of the Ox. In both cases the side-wall of the left hemisphere is removed. (After Mihalkovics.) CRANIAL AND SPINAL NERVES. 207 side, so that the cavity is no longer circular, but resembles a narrow vertical slit. In the region of the cerebral hemispheres, the sides and floor of the canal are much thickened, but in the region of the third and fourth ventricles, its roof becomes excessively thin, so as to form a membrane consisting of scarcely more than a single layer of cells. 12. Another important event, at about this stage in the development of the embryo, is the formation of the cranial and spinal nerves. The cranial nerves sprout out of a continuous band (the neural band), composed of two plates, which connects the dorsal edges of the neural canal with the external epiblast. This band separates from the epiblast and becomes a crest on the roof of the brain, with its two plates fused together. The crest extends forward as far as the roof of the mid-brain. As the roots of the cranial nerves grow centrifugally and become established, the crest connecting them is partially obliterated. The posterior roots of the spinal nerves are outgrowths of a series of median processes of cells that appear on the dorsal part of the cord. These outgrowths are symmetrically arranged, and attached to the walls of the cord ; but their original attachment is not permanent. Such rudimentary posterior spinal nerves divide subsequently into three portions a rounded portion nearest to the cord, an enlarged middle portion forming the rudiment of a ganglion, and a periphe- ral portion forming the commencement of the nerve. The origin of the anterior roots of the spinal nerves is less satisfactorily made out. 13. In the further development of the hind-brain the medulla oblongata undergoes changes of a somewhat complicated character. Its roof becomes extended and thinner ; where the two lateral halves of the brain were at first united (at the raphe) a separation takes place, so that the sole union of the two sides is by a single row of cells. The thin roof of the fourth ventricle is thus formed. The floor of the whole hind-brain becomes thickened, and on its outer surface a layer of longitudinal non-medullated nerve-fibres appears. The roof of the anterior part of the hind-brain, which has become thickened instead of thinned out thus forming the rudimentary cerebellum is developed, first, by the formation of the median lobe (or vermiform process) and, afterward, by the swelling of its sides so as to constitute the cerebellar hemispheres. 14. The changes in the development of the mid-brain (or mesencephalon) are comparatively simple. When the cranial flex- ure has taken place, the mid-brain is left at the front end of the axis of the body, as a single vesicle with a vaulted roof and a curved 208 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. floor, whose cavity is known as the aqueduct of Sylvius. The cor- pora quadrigemina of the two sides are marked off from each other by the appearance of a vertical furrow about the sixth month ; and about a month later a transverse depression sepa- rates the anterior (nates) and posterior (testes) pairs. The thickening of the floor of the mid-brain gives rise to the crura cerebri. 15. Of the two divisions into which the fore-brain has already become divided, the posterior constitutes the so- called " thalamen-cephalon." Fio. 7S.-Head of the Embryo of a Sheep, cut This body IS at first a simple through the middle. 3/j. (Kolliker.) u, under * jaw ; *, tongue ; , septum narium ; occipttale vesicle. formed of Spmdle- basilare ; tfi, thalamus options; vt, roof of the third ventricle ; cp, posterior commissure ; mh, shaped Cells, With Wails OI mid-brain divided by a fold into two parts ;/, falx . . ., . , T , cerebri ; /', terminal plate of the fore-brain. At nearly Uniform thickness. Its the prolongation of the line offm is the foramen of Monro. , tentorium cerebelli ; cl, cerebellum ; pi, plexus of the fourth ventricle. floor gives rise to the optic chiasm and the origin of the optic nerves, and to the rudiment of the infundi- bulum ; and its sides become thick- ened to form the optic thalami, while the interval between them enlarges toward the base and constitutes the cavity of the third ventricle. The more complicated changes which its roof undergoes give rise to the pineal gland and other small surrounding structures. It is the anterior and larger portion of the fore-brain which constitutes the rudiment of the cere- bral hemispheres. In this cerebral rudiment, also, a floor and a roof may be distinguished. The former is de- veloped into the principal basal gan- glia, the striate bodies ; the latter into the structures of the cerebral hemispheres proper. The formation of the striate bodies (corpora striata) is in fact due to thickenings of the walls of the floor of this Fio. 79 Brain of Human Embryo of five months, with Basal Ganglia laid bare. Natural size. (Kolliker.) st, corpus striatum ; o, optic thalamus ; to, ante- rior lobe (lunatus) of the cerebellum, and Ip, posterior lobe of the same ; , semilunaris superior, and si, inferior ; j, pyramid. DEVELOPMENT OF THE BRAIN. 209 rudiment. The laying of the commissures is the characteristic feature of the development of the mammalian hemispheres. These are the anterior commissure, the fornix, and the corpus callosum. But into the details of this process we do not need to enter. One characteristic of the em- bryonic development of mammals is the early enlargement of the cerebral hemi- spheres ; in the human embryo they are even by the tenth week much larger than all the other parts of the brain. At this time they are hollow bodies with comparatively thin upper walls, the lateral ventricles being dilated and com- municating with each other through a wide opening, and with the third ven- tricle by the foramen of Monro. They grow from before backward, and thus cover up, one after the other, the optic thalami, corpora quadrigemina, and cere- bellum. Their floor keeps on thicken- ing, and thus the striate bodies become greatly enlarged, and project upward into the lateral ventricles, giving these cav- rigemina -- (or niesencephaion) ; ities their arched form. The following table, exhibits the rela- ments - tions, with respect to their development, in which the different parts of the brain stand to its fundamental rudiments : c, cerebellum; mo, medulla ob- longata ; ss, spinal cord with its bracnial and crural enlarge- f 1. Prosencephalon, I Fore-brain. I. Anterior prima- ' ry vesicle. 2. Thalamencephalon, Inter-brain. II. Middle primary J 3. Mesencephalon, vesicle. Mid-brain. III. Posterior prima- ry vesicle. 4. Epencephalon, Hind-brain. 5. Metencephalon, After-brain. f Cerebral Hemispheres. Cor- pora Striata, Corpus Callo sum, Fornix, Lateral Ven- tricles, Olfactory bulbs. Thalami Optici, Pineal gland, Pituitary body, Third Ven- tricle, Optic nerve (prima- rily). Corpora quadrigemina, Crura Cerebri, Aqueduct of Syl- vius, Optic nerve (secon- darily). Cerebellum, Pons Varolii, anterior part of the Fourth Ventricle. Medulla Oblongata, Fourth Ventricle, Auditory nerve. 1 Taken from Quain's Anatomy (Ninth Edition), IL, p. 828. 210 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. ra parieto* c FIG. 81. Brain of a Six-months Human Embryo. Natural size. (Kolliker.) ol, olfactory bulb ; /s, fissure of Sylvius ; c, cere- bellum ; p, pons Varolii ; /, flocculus ; o, olive. The more important convolutions and sulci of the cerebral hemi- spheres (those called "primitive ") result from the folding of the whole substance of the wall of the hemi- sphere ; the less im- portant (the so-called "secondary") consist merely of depressions and elevations of its more superficial por- tion. The former ap- pear earlier the first of the primitive sulci being the fissure of Sylvius, which is visi- ble before the end of the third month. By the end of the seventh month almost all the principal features of the cerebral hemispheres, "both convolutions and sulci, are already fixed. 16. The nervous parts of the eye are differentiations of certain lateral growths of the germinal brain-buds, called the "optic vesicles." The optic vesicles are outgrowths from the sides of the first cerebral vesicle, and are originally connected with it by short and wide stalks ; at first they stand out at nearly right angles to the axis of the embryo. The stalks soon become narrower and thus form the rudiments of the optic nerves ; 1 at the same time the rudiments of the retina are formed from the vesicles themselves. The bulb of the optic vesicle is * made into a cup with two walls by doubling it upon FlG - itself ; thus a second optic vesicle or "optic cup" is produced, as distinguished from the original one. The lens of the eye is made by thickening some of the superficial epiblast and involuting it in- ward over the front of the optic cup, or secondary optic vesicle. 1 But His and Kolliker suppose these nerves to be formed by secondary em- anation from the chiasm or nervous centre. . Longitudinal Sections of the Eye of an Embryo, in three stages. (From Remak.) 1, commencement of the formation of the lens, /, by depression of a part of A, the corneous layer ; u, r, the primitive ocular vesi- cle is doubled back on itself by the depression of the commencing lens. 2, the depression for the lens is now enclosed, with the lens beginning to be formed on the inner side ; the optic vesicle is more folded back. 3, a third stage, in which the secondary optic vesicle, g I, begins to be formed. DEVELOPMENT OF EYE AND EAE. 211 This involution has at first the form of a pit, then of a closed sac with thick walls, then of a solid mass. The cavity between the two walls of the optic cup is closed up by bringing the walls into contact. The subsequent development of the different parts of the eye is conditioned upon the fact that the walls of the optic cup grow more rapidly than does the lens, and that their growth does not take place equally in all portions of the cup. It is by changes in the surrounding mesoblast, which takes on the character of an investment, that the outline of the eyeball is defi- nitely formed (the choroid and sclerotic). The vitreous humor also is a inesoblastic product which is supposed to originate as a kind of transudation through the so-called choroid slit. Of the two walls, the inner or anterior is originally somewhat thicker ; and since, in most parts of the cup it grows more rapidly, it con- stantly increases in relative thickness. But just in front of a line which afterward becomes the ora serrata, both layers soon cease to thicken and then completely coalesce ; thus the hind portion or true retina becomes marked off from the ciliary ridges and the iris, while the wide opening of the optic cup is narrowed into a smaller orifice that constitutes the pupil. By differentiations of the inner or anterior wall of the hind portion of the optic cup its cells mul- tiplying rapidly and undergoing morphological changes while the wall is thickening the different layers of the retina are formed. It is a significant fact that in its early stage this wall resembles the brain in its structure, and may be considered as a part of that organ. It is not necessary to enter into a more detailed description of the development of the different parts of the eye. 17. The ear originally appears on either side of the hind-brain as an involution of the external epiblast, sunk in a mass of the mesoblast. It is then simply a shallow pit with a wide-open mouth. The mouth closes up and the pit then becomes a closed vesicle (the otic vesicle) which is lined with epiblast and sur- rounded by mesoblast. As the walls of this vesicle thicken, its cavity enlarges. The shape of the vesicle is at first nearly spheri- cal, but it soon becomes triangular, with the apex of the triangle directed inward and downward. It is by elongating this apex that the rudiment of the cochlear canal is formed. Part of the vesicle becomes stretched into a long, narrow, hollow process (the recessus vestibuli), and from the outer wall of the main body two protube- rances grow, which are the rudiments of the vertical semicircular canals. These parts of the auditory labyrinth are soon more clearly defined. The cochlear canal is further elongated and curved ; the recessus is also stretched out more ; and from a new protuberance 212 EMBRYONIC LIFE OF MAN. the horizontal canal is developed. Another protuberance, which becomes apparent at the inner commencement of the cochlear canal, is converted into the sacculus by being constricted on either side. The rest of the cavity, into which all the other parts open, may now be called the utriculus. Dilatations of the semicircular canals form the ampullae. When the cochlear canal has reached two and a half coils, the thickened epithelium of its lower surface forms a double ridge, from which the organ of Corti is developed. For the details of the structure of the labyrinth we refer to the previous description of this end-organ of sense. 18. All the coarser differentiations of structure to which refer- ence has thus far been made are only the expression as it were of certain histogenetic changes which have been secretly taking place. The laying down of delicate threads of nervous tissue, the proliferation of nerve-cells along definite lines of movement, have resulted in combining these elements by a living process into the organs of the nervous mechanism. The white matter of the cord is supposed to result from a differentiation of the outer parts of its superficial cells into longitudinal nerve-fibres ; the latter remain, however, for a considerable time without their medullary sheath. The white matter first appears in four patches at the front and back of either side, in which the individual fibres seem like small dots. The gray matter of the cord is formed by a differentiation of the principal mass of the walls of the medullary canal. The outer cells first lose their epithelial-like arrangement, and then become converted into true nerve-cells, with prolongations that constitute nerve-fibres. The early histological character of the parts of the brain which lie back of the cerebral hemispheres is very similar to that of the spinal cord. In the floor of the hind- brain and mid-brain a superficial layer of delicate nerve-fibres is early formed. The cells internal to the nerve-fibres give rise to the epithelial layer which lines the cavities of the ventricles and to an outer layer of gray matter. In the fore-brain the walls of the hemispheres become divided into two layers, between which the fibres of the crura cerebri interpose themselves. The inner layer unites with these fibres to give rise to most of the white matter of the hemispheres ; the outer layer of rounded cells becomes further differentiated into the outer part of the gray matter, which has comparatively few cells, and a deeper layer with numerous cells, the latter forming the principal mass of the gray matter of the cortex. 19. The preceding description of the outlines of the develop- ment of the human nervous mechanism is derived, for the most MECHANICAL THEORY OF THE EMBRYO. 213 part, from the study of other embryos than those of the human species. It is probably, however, substantially true for the latter also. It is valuable for the purposes of Physiological Psychology, chiefly as emphasizing what has already been said concerning the structure and functions of this mechanism in its developed form. The nature of the process by which the nervous system is devel- oped, as well as the nature of the developed structure and its func- tions, as far as physical science can go at all, leads us in the direc- tion of a mechanical theory. But in respect to both, such a theory is at present in an exceedingly fragmentary and uncertain condition. Further investigations may largely remove the present limitations. But the most complete theory possible can hardly be more than a statement of the order and extent of physical changes, the real causes and meaning of which it lies beyond the power of a mechani- cal theory to give. The impregnated ovum does, indeed, become converted into the developed organism by an evolution that, at every step in its course, appears as an alteration in the arrangement of material molecules, under conditions derived from the original nature of the molecules themselves, from their necessary relations to each other, and from the action of their total environment. By division of that which was single into several parts, by bending of that which was straight, by stretching in one direction and compressing elsewhere, by swell- ing and dilating in the various outlines under the influence of press- ure, by folding and tucking in so as to close up an opening here and form another there, by laying down cells of the same kind in right lines or grouping them in masses, etc. in brief, by motion of particles of matter in such way that the motion of each is con- ditioned upon that of the others, the nervous mechanism is built up. What it can accomplish in the way of further molecular mo- tion, after it is thus built up, depends of course in large measure upon what it is made to be by the very process of building. How far it is possible even to propound a mechanical theory of the build- ing process belongs to the speculations of embryologists to con- sider. It is our next problem to consider as a whole the few data upon which it has been thought possible to base a mechanical theory of the behavior of the nervous system after it has once been constructed as a result of the embryonic process. CHAPTEK YIL MECHANICAL THEORY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 1. THE machine-like nature of much of the structure and move- ment of the human body does not escape the most ordinary obser- vation. When this body, either as a whole or with respect to some of its parts, changes its position in space, its various masses sup- port and act upon each other in essentially the same manner as the masses of matter which compose the parts of any machine con- structed by human skill. Such movement is possible for it, because its framework of bones has a rigidity sufficient to sustain the other less rigid organs ; and because the bones are so divided, and yet articulated, that they can assume different relations toward one an- other in accordance with the simplest principles of mechanics. The laws of the lever, of the pulley, the ball-and-socket joint, etc., need no modification when applied to this particular machine of the human body. The action of certain other of its parts, which do not belong to the bony framework but which are of muscular or epithelial structure, is also plainly of the same machine-like character. The movement of the heart, for example, is in part to be explained as that of a pump with chambers and valves ; and the flow of the blood through the arteries as that of a fluid pumped through con- duits, of unlike and changeable sizes. So, too, the lungs may be, with considerable propriety, compared to bellows which alternately suck in and expel the surrounding atmosphere. The optics of the eye and the acoustics of the ear are special only so far as the struct- ure of the organs makes necessary a special application of the gen- eral laws of those sciences. Moreover, the distribution of the fluids among the tissues of the body takes place under the laws which govern the distribution of fluids generally when separated by membranes which they can permeate. Nor is the chemistry of the same tissues and fluids by any means wholly unlike that with which the experiments of the laboratory make us familiar. When, how- ever, we begin to speak of those changes of relative position which take place at extremely minute distances among the molecular ele- MACHINE AND MECHANISM. 215 ments of which the larger masses of the body are composed, we seem compelled to drop the conception of a machine and to seek both another conception and another title. The very attempt, then, to explain the motion of the more purely machine-like parts of the human body, leads us to consider certain activities of other parts for which the word " mechanism " is more appropriate. The movement of none of the more or less rigid or- gans of the body originates within these organs themselves. The changes of relative position in the parts, with which the ordinary laws of mechanics deal, imply antecedent molecular changes in other parts with which these laws cannot deal. The motion which finds its final expression in the swing of the arm, or of the leg, in the lifting of a weight, and even in the contraction of the heart, or in the rising and falling of the chest, does not begin in arm, or leg, or ribs, or diaphragm, or cardiac muscles. The change of position of so considerable masses of matter is but the summing-up of in- numerable minute molecular changes which began within the body, but outside of the masses themselves. If, for example, we inquire as to what causes the bones to move however strictly their mo- tion, once begun, may follow the laws of mechanics the answer is to be found in the pull of the tendons, or cord-like structures, which are attached to them. And if we then inquire, What causes the tendons to pull upon the bones by means of their attachment ? the answer must be, That it is the contraction of the muscles which pulls upon the tendons. The next step in following this chain of causes, however, intro- duces us to a different class of considerations from any of the fore- going. For we cannot say that the contraction of the muscles is caused by the pull of the nerves upon them. The movement of muscular fibre in contraction is an altogether different affair from the movement of the bones as they are pulled by the muscles ; nor do the nerves act upon the muscles as the muscles act upon the tendons. The elasticity of the muscles is, indeed, a mechanical quality, like that of which we avail ourselves in the construction of machines. But the quality of elasticity does not fully explain the behavior of the so-called muscle-nerve machine when its muscular tissue is contracting or relaxing. Yet the living muscle, in itself considered, may certainly be looked upon as a molecular mechan- ism. It is a system of minute particles of matter which act upon each other at indefinitely small distances ; and which, when any motion is set up at one part of it, propagates such motion accord- ing to laws that are given in the very constitution and arrangement of the particles themselves. This is precisely what we understand 216 THE NEKVOUS SYSTEM A MECHANISM. by a physical molecular mechanism. The office of the nerve with respect to the muscle is simpty, as we know, to start that molecular activity which it is the function of the irritated muscle itself to ex- ercise. The nerve, however, cannot perform its office of irritating the muscle without being in a state of molecular commotion called the " excitement " of the nerve. And, further, this excited condition of that part of the nerve which is in immediate contact with the muscle is itself a state of the nerve which has been propagated from a distant point of the nervous matter. All the machine-like move- ments of the masses of the body require us, therefore, to look for their origin in minute molecular changes that originate in its ner- vous elements. And for the further account of these neural molec- ular changes we are to look to a mechanical theory of the nervous system. 2. The basis for a general view of the nervous system as a mechanism has been laid in all the preceding examination ; and it cannot be denied that the results of this examination are such as to dispose us favorably toward the attempt to develop such a view into a complete mechanical theory. Physical science, as a matter of course, strives to establish such a theory. It knows no other way of considering any group of phenomena when brought before it for examination. To deny totally the application of the conception of a mechanism to the action of the nervous system would be to refuse to apply to its phenomena the same scientific treatment which we apply to all other physical phenomena. To limit, a priori, such application would be to restrict improperly, on merely theoretical grounds, the area of the phenomena with which such science is entitled to deal. The fact that molecular changes here are correlated with another class of phenomena which we call " mental," in no wise destroys the propriety of pushing our physical science of the nervous system to its furthest possible limits. The movements of all material bodies, whether in the elemental shape of the molecules, or in the shape of the same molecules when aggre- gated into masses, as well as the laws under which such bodies in movement act and react upon each other, constitute the legitimate sphere of physical science. But it is to a system of interacting molecules that the conception of mechanism especially applies. The aim of physical research with regard to any given system of this kind is, therefore, not accomplished until all the movements of its different parts are explained in the light of a consistent mechanical theory. This general principle of all physical science neither needs nor permits a special exception in the case of the human nerves, organs of sense, and brain. THE CONSTITUTION MECHANICAL. 217 On the other hand, the very unsatisfactory condition of the data for a mechanical theory of the human nervous system has been im- plied in each of the preceding chapters. It will appear all the more plainly now as we present briefly a statement of two or three such theories in the form in which it has been found possible for different investigators to state and to defend them. Nor can we express much confidence that physics and physiology combined will ever be able to point to a complete theory of so intricate and delicate a mechanism as this nervous system. Moreover, we do not by any means affirm that a purely mechanical treatment, however complete, would of itself suffice to furnish a satisfactory understand- ing of all the phenomena ; or even that the phenomena in general could by any possibility be brought solely under the terms of such treatment. We only affirm the unrestricted right of physical sci- ence to attempt, in the light of the conception of mechanism, an ex- planation of the nervous system as well as of all other physical subjects ; and also its right to its persistent faith that So far as physical science can explain any such subject, all the special difficul- ties of the nervous system can be fitly considered only in this way. 3. The chemical constitution and structural form of the ele- ments of nervous matter require that the system which they com- pose should be regarded in the light of the conception of mechan- ism. It is true that physical science cannot give an accurate descrip- tion of the chemical processes which take place in the formation of the nerve-fibres and nerve-cells, or during their functional activity ; it cannot do so much as this for the living tissues generally. But it finds here the same chemical elements which exist elsewhere in nature, especially the four elements, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, and carbon. It nowhere finds these elements behaving differently in the nervous system from the way in which it is their nature to behave elsewhere, under similar circumstances. And the fact that precisely similar circumstances do not occur to induce the same combination and interaction of these elements outside of the ner- vous system, is traced back to its causes in a succession of occur- rences that all have the character belonging to the chemistry of living tissues. We know of no sap which is suitable for forming organisms in general, but which is itself a perfectly homogeneous fluid. Nucleated granules in the very chemical constituents which give conditions to all the subsequent activity of the molecules, are revealed by microscopic examination of those cells from which the whole body springs. This fact, together with the character of the subsequent process, may lead some to insist that a certain special form of energy (called "vital force," or by some Ies3 obnoxious 218 THE NERVOUS SYSTEM A MECHANISM. title), is marshalling the minute particles under its superior control. But such way of considering the phenomena whether admissible or inadmissible does not at all help us to dispense with the purely mechanical point of view. In the original living germ with which the organism began, and in all its subsequent development, every chemical change in nervous matter is nothing more than a move- ment of physical molecules, strictly under the conditions furnished by their constitution and previous arrangement. The general significance of the chemical constitution of ner- vous matter, with reference to a mechanical theory of the nervous system, is by no means wholly obscure. It is obvious that all the energy expended in the movement of the body as a whole, or of its larger masses, originates in minute molecular changes. The latter changes have, of course, a direct relation to the chemical constitu- tion of the tissues in which they occur. The muscular fibre can contract because its molecules admit of that rearrangement in which the contraction essentially consists ; for doing the amount of work implied in such rearrangement, this fibre is, of course, depen- dent upon its own chemical constitution. But the source of the excitation of the muscle is to be found in antecedent molecular changes within the nervous system ; indeed, all the changes that are to be summed up in the work done by and within the rigid masses of the body have their origin here. It accords, then, with the mechanical conception of the nervous system that its chemistry should be just such as we have seen that it actually is. Nervous matter holds in store a large amount of energy that is easily dis- posable ; of energy that will be yielded freely and rapidly if any- thing occurs to start the process within the system of molecules of which such matter is composed. For the molecules are of such kind as readily break up and recombine their elements in simpler forms ; in doing this they render kinetic a large amount of energy which they have previously held latent. No mechanical theory of the nervous system can explain the meaning of all the various structural forms which the elements of this system assume. It cannot be told, for example, what peculiar place in the mechanism belongs to the different shapes of nerve- cells, bipolar, multipolar, stellate, etc. Nor can a complete picture be drawn of the differences in character which the nerve-commotion takes as it passes from the nerve-fibres to the nerve-cells, or from one nerve-cell to another. We can only insist upon the undoubted general fact that all these structural forms have whatever signifi- cance belongs to them, because they are themselves molecular structures, capable of undergoing, in relation to each other, those THE ARKANGEMENT MECHANICAL. 219 very changes in which the functional activity of the nervous system consists. 4. There can be no doubt that the arrangement of the nervous elements into a system corresponds to the conception of mechanism. A certain work of "concatenating" the different physical systems of the body, and of adjusting its relations to the changes in its environment, requires to be accomplished. This problem demands a three-fold exercise of function ; it is a problem in the construction of a mechanism. The nervous system actually is of threefold con- struction ; its threefold construction is the answer which it prac- tically makes to the above-mentioned problem. One part of the complex problem consists in the conversion of certain of those molecular motions which take place in nature outside of the living organism into molecular motion within the tissues of such organism. The solution of this part of the problem is furnished by the end- organs of the nervous system. The end-organs are those special mechanisms which are adapted to convert the molecular motions called stimuli into the molecular motions called neural excitation. That by far the larger portion of the eye and ear, for example, acts in a purely mechanical way, there is no doubt. It is the office of the great mass of the eye to transmit and refract the rays of light ; of the ear to transmit and condense the acoustic waves. But when the nervous elements of the retina and of the organ of Corti re- ceive the physical processes transmitted to them, they transmute these physical processes into physiological neural processes ; in doing this they act as special molecular mechanisms. The second part of the complex problem before the nervous sys- tem consists in the conduction in all necessary directions of these neural processes ; only on this condition can distant parts of the nervous system act, as it were, in view of each other, and thus the whole body be bound into a living unity under the influence of changes in its environment, and in the ideas and impulses of the mind. The nerve-fibres solve this part of the problem. This they do by acting as mechanisms, which have such a molecular constitu- tion and function that a commotion, started at any point in the physical elements of the system, spreads from molecule to molecule, in accordance with the laws of the system. The third part of the same complex problem requires for its solu- tion structures and functions still more intricate and inexplicable. Incoming molecular disturbances must be modified and redistributed so as to give rise to outgoing molecular disturbances along definite tracts, in order that definite groups of muscles may be made to con- tract. Only in this way can the whole physical organism, by a so- 220 THE NERVOUS SYSTEM A MECHANISM. called reflex activity, adjust its condition, in view of the presence of given kinds and degrees of stimuli. Moreover, the vital functions the movements that control respiration, digestion, circulation of the blood and of other fluids, etc. must be united so as to work to a common end, and with the modified forms and degrees of their re- spective energies, which the changing circumstances require. Still further, not only must the neural processes set up by the end-or- gans and conducted inward by the afferent nerves have a place of meeting in proximity with the centres of origin for the correspond- ing efferent impulses ; but all the neural processes in this place of meeting must also be so modified and made mutually dependent that they can be correlated, under psycho-physical laws, with the processes of mind. It is the central organs which alone possess the molecular construction and functions necessary for such won- derful reflex and automatic activities. In their highest form the hemispheres of the human brain they solve the problem of pro- viding a system of molecules, whose constitution and changes may be immediately related with the phenomena of mind. These central organs are extremely intricate physical structures. It cannot be pretended that even a beginning has been made toward a satisfac- tory theory of their functional activity considered as a special case in molecular physics. But this fact does not affect the confidence which is based upon what is known of physical structures in gen- eral, that in these organs, the changes which take place are essen- tially of the same order as are those with which the science of mo- lecular physics has elsewhere to deal. They are modes of motion in which the behavior of each molecule, regarded as a constituent element of the system, is conditioned upon the constitution and behavior of the other members of the same system. That is to say, the central organs must be regarded in the light of the con- ception of mechanism. 5. The general office of the nervous system may, then, be de- scribed in somewhat the following manner. The development of a rich and varied life, both animal and intellectual, requires a great store of sensations and of motions. The sensations are primarily designed to serve as signs of changes in the environment of the animal to which his condition must be adapted by movement of his bodily parts ; but they are also to serve as a basis for intel- lectual attainment and development. The forces of external nature continually storm the peripheral parts of the animal's body. In order that any of these forces may act as the stimuli of sensations, they must be converted into molecular motions within the tissues of this body. In order, further, that the masses of the body may THE EQUILIBRATING MECHANICAL. 221 constantly be readjusted to the external changes of which the sen- sations are signs, the molecular motions must, in turn, be converted into movements of these masses. In other words, a process of con- stant interchange must take place between the animal organism and external nature. Disturbances in one part of the body, by the play upon it of nat- ure's energy, instead of becoming injurious or destructive, are thus made serviceable through inducing the needed disturbances of other parts of the same body. The equilibrium on which life depends is maintained. Moreover, the material necessary for self- conscious development, for a growing knowledge of the so-called outside world, is furnished through the conduction of these dis- turbances to their common meeting-places in the central organs. To accomplish the general work of equilibrating the interaction of the different parts of the body, of readjusting its condition to the changing condition of its surroundings, some special construc- tion and arrangement of material molecules is necessary. If the work is to be done in a highly elaborate way, a very intricate ar- rangement of an indefinitely great number of chemically complex molecules is necessary. Such an arrangement is the human ner- vous system. But just because its arrangement and function are of this kind, it is a " mechanism." As a highly complex molecular mechanism it utilizes the disturbances which arise from the en- vironment. It binds together all the other systems of the body in living reciprocity of energies and functions. Its superficial parts are so constructed that they can be set in motion by various forms of physical energy by light, heat, sound, chemical change, etc. ; they are also adapted fitly to modify the impressions thus received. The molecules of its conducting nerves are so constituted and ar- ranged that they can indicate the path along which the disturbance thus occasioned must pass ; they can dictate the conditions and laws under which its course must be completed. The molecules of its central organs are capable of assuming inconceivably varied re- lations to each other, of thus transmuting and redistributing the nerve-commotions which reach them along the incoming tracts, and even (it would seem) of starting automatically outgoing disturb- ances in response to self-conscious sensations and ideas. But all the foregoing offices of the nervous system are nothing but the movements of physical elements, in constant reciprocal de- pendence upon each other, though in response to excitations lying outside of the system itself. To move thus is the function of a molecular mechanism. So far as science can control the different parts of the nervous system for experimental purposes, it finds 222 THE NERVOUS SYSTEM A MECHANISM. them behaving in such a manner as to make a plain demand for a physical and mechanical theory in explanation of their behavior. 6. The foregoing description of the nervous system as a mech- anism, like all similar descriptions, undoubtedly lacks scientific quality. It is neither exact nor in such form as to admit of ex- perimental verification. It is largely based upon conjectures, full of gaps and assumptions ; and were it pressed at every point for proof, it would be obliged to rely much upon general principles in mechanics (the special applications of which to the case in hand are by no means certain or obvious), and even to indulge in hopes and promises with reference to the future, rather than present demon- stration. May we not know more precisely the nature of the mo- lecular changes which constitute the functions of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells ? Cannot physical science help us to complete these be- ginnings of a theory ? In answer to the question just raised we have already seen how little satisfaction is afforded on applying to the science of chemistry. On general principles of physical science there can be little doubt that the excitation and conduction of nerve-commotion is dependent upon a chemical change in the nervous tissue itself. Moreover, we know that the process of conduction in the nerve requires each of its molecules to act upon the neighboring elements as the condition of the process continuing. Nor can this process itself be a mere impartation of motion, from molecule to molecule ; on the contrary, the phenomena of electrotonus seem to show that it must also con- sist in the setting free of energy which exists latent within the molecules of the nerve-substance. These molecules contain, then, by virtue of their constitution, stored or potential energy which is converted into kinetic energy in the propagation of the process of excitation, and which is expended, in part, in either inhibiting or increasing the energy of that process. Such potential energy can scarcely be other than chemical. Accordingly, we should be tempted to describe the process of progressive excitation of the nerve somewhat as follows : Every element of the nerve, by reason of its highly complex and unstable chemical constitution, contains a large store of energy ; the excite- ment of the nerve consists in the explosive decomposition succes- sively of these elements of the nerve ; and the result of the decom- position is the setting free of the stored energy to be expended in part in the excitation of the next adjoining elements. The process, then, is not altogether unlike the burning of a line of powder grains. Such an hypothesis, however, would at once have to answer several difficult questions. "Why does not the whole of the explosive INTERFERENCES OF NERVE-COMMOTION. 223 substance burn up, instead of only an amount of it approximately proportional to the strength of the stimulus which sets the process agoing ? Analogies may indeed be found in the union of chlorine and hydrogen jinder the action of light. What checks the process in the nerve as a whole, and what limits it quantitatively in a differ- ent way at different points in its course, so as to give the phenomena of anelectrotonus and catelectrotonus ? (comp., Chap. III., 19 f.). Moreover, direct observation has as yet discovered no indisputable evidence of functional chemical changes in the nerve-fibres. If such changes exist at all they are exceedingly small. 7. Allusion has been made (p. 119 f.) to the fact that the effect of several excitations of a nerve-stretch is compounded, as it were, in the action of the attached muscle. That is to say, excitations which are simultaneous, or which follow each other with sufficient and not too great rapidity, are summed up in the nerve, like mo- lecular waves of nerve-commotion piled upon each other. Besides such phenomena of " summation," there exist analagous phe- nomena of so-called " interference ; " and, further, of the facilitat- ing effect which one excitation has upon others following it along the same paths of conduction, especially in the central organs. These and similar phenomena tempt us to consider the activity of the nervous substance in terms of an exceedingly complex sum in the addition and subtraction of molecular disturbances of a wave- like character. Elaborate experiments have been made to deter- mine the laws under which such summation or interference of electrical excitations takes place. Thus G. Valentin 1 assumes that the case of the nerves comes under the general theory of molecular waves that may either be piled upon each other, or may interfere with each other. The interferences he calls " positive " when the currents are moving in the same direction, " negative " when they are moving in opposite directions ; and such currents may, of course, be either ascending or descending. The character of the interferences is to be denned by the way in which the nerve-muscle machine responds to these four kinds of interference. The inter- ference has a heightening effect (is erhohende) when the result indicated by the behavior of the muscle is greater than the sum of two single effects from the partial excitations that are compounded ; a depressing effect when the result is less than this sum. If the effect of the interference is such as to reduce the result to zero, it is called inhibitory. Valentin concludes that, in case of inter- ferences of excitations from one and the same current (with respect 1 In Pfluger's Archiv, vii. (1873), pp. 458-496, article on the Interfer- ences of Electrical Excitations. 224 THE NERVOUS SYSTEM A MECHANISM. to degree, direction, etc.), the character of the effects produced depends upon the original molecular constitution of the nerve. Just as its constitution is decisive with regard to the nature of the muscular contractions that follow a single excitation of the nerve, so is it also decisive with regard to the results of interference. These results, moreover, conform to the same laws after decapita- tion or poisoning as before. And further, the same rules govern in the case of interferences of two currents, if both the currents are of about the same degree of strength. Finally, according to Valentin, the same rules belong to the interferences that occur in cases of reflex action, or of the stimulation of motor nerves through the sensory, as those which apply to the direct stimulation of the motor nerves. It is apparent that the only net gain from the fore- going experiments consists in the information that the molecular constitution of the nerves themselves determines all the variable elements in the results of exciting them. But this would be an assumption fairly made by every attempt at a physical science of the nervous functions. And inasmuch as we can make no such veri- fiable statements concerning the nature of this molecular constitu- tion as will serve the purposes of a precise mechanical theory, it is hard to see what advance has been gained toward the construction of such a theory. The phenomena caused by the reciprocal action of different ex- citations within the central nervous system are, of course, much more complex and difficult to bring under a theory of molecular wave-like impulses, than are the phenomena of the comparatively simple nerve-muscle machine. A fortiori, molecular physics is unable to propose a satisfactory theory for the central organs. According to Exner, 1 many of the phenomena are covered by the general principle that one excitation acts to facilitate or, as it were, smooth the path for others passing, after only a brief interval, along the same course. This principle he distinguishes from that of < c summation, " when applied to reflex action. The latter term Exner applies to the accumulation in the central organ of excitations which, taken singly, are too weak to produce any reflex motion, but which by their combined strength do produce such motion. The principle of " facilitation," however, refers to the condition of the central parts after the passage through them of a stimulus which has already called forth some reflex action. Exner's experiments led him to conclude that the motor excitation of some one ex- tremity from the brain (that is, by stimulating, in the brain, the so-called motor area of the extremity) facilitates the subsequent pas- 1 Article in Pfluger's Archiv., xxviii., pp. 487 ff. PHYSICS OF THE CENTRAL ORGANS. 225 sage of reflex stimulus affecting the same extremity ; and, con- versely, stimulating an extremity reflexly facilitates the passage of a subsequent motor excitation from the area of the brain to the same extremity. Thus, for example, the reflex motions of the fore- leg of a rabbit, produced by stimulating the toes of that leg, were found to be increased in intensity if the so-called cerebral motor centre of the fore-leg was also stimulated. Different reflex excita- tions also may facilitate each other's effect in the same way. For example, the sensory stimulation of the left foot has the effect of facilitating the reflex act which, as it might appear, would relate only to the right foot and its motor area in the central organ ; and such reflex action of the right foot facilitates the contraction set free in the same foot by stimulating the left-foot section of the spi- nal cord. Exner was unable, however, to obtain any inhibitory effect upon the motion of the extremities by stimulating various other places of the cortex of the cerebrum, or by stimulating the cerebellum. He also found that when one side of the cortex of the cerebrum is stimulated by electricity so as to produce a condition of tetanus in one extremity of the animal, the results of two excita- tionsone as a reflex from the foot and one directly from the same side of the brain are compounded in a way which seems incom- patible with any known form of the summation and interference of molecular wave-like disturbances. Indeed (to return to the simpler case), Griitzner ' seems justified in saying that, strictly speaking, we cannot without qualification even represent what takes place when two currents of electricity act in combination upon a nerve, as though it were a matter of the addition or subtraction of their separate effects. For it is possible that an electrical current of an intensity equal to the amount of the natural nerve-current (current of rest = a) and the current used as stimulus (current of action = b), taken together (a + b), will not ex- cite a nerve that shows no current at all, although the latter (b) alone will excite the nerve if just previously the former (a) was present in the nerve. The currents already existing in the nerve, when the exciting current is applied, are, therefore, not simply added to or subtracted from the latter ; but they produce molecu- lar changes of an unknown kind which tend to induce the origina- tion of so-called "cathodic" and "anodic" places in the nerve that is, places of exalted and places of depressed excitability. Thus a weaker current will excite the nerve when it is in a condi- tion of exalted excitability ; a stronger current may fail to excite the nerve when in a condition of depressed excitability. 1 See Pfliiger's Archiv, xxviii., p. 144 f. 15 226 THE ELECTRICAL THEORIES. How obscure and complicated are the molecular conditions con- nected with the excitation of the nerve is further shown by the effect of giving different treatments to the cross-section of the nerve. If the nerve is simply cut, its behavior under stimulation is differ- ent from that which occurs when it has been bound before the cross-section is made. Binding the nerve produces, for some min- utes after cross-section, a large increase of its excitability in the immediate neighborhood of the injured place ; this is true for all kinds of stimuli, including the electric current in both directions. From five to ten minutes subsequently, however, the making of the current in the opposite direction to the current induced by cross- section has frequently a diminished rather than an increased effect. 8. On the whole, it would appear, then, that the ability to lay even a basis for a strictly scientific molecular theory of the nervous mechanism depends upon the ability satisfactorily to explain the electrical process in the nerves and their consequent behavior under electrical stimulation. It would by no means follow that a com- plete theory for the comparatively simple phenomena of the nerve- muscle machine would furnish the sure clew, not to say the full explanation, of all the activities of the nervous system. On the contrary, the evidence is overwhelming that the working of the complete nervous mechanism involves other principles than those which may be deemed sufficient for the case of the single nerve and muscle when under electrical stimulation. But, plainly, the more complex case cannot be solved without first solving the far less complex one. And yet the simplest possible case of nervous molecular mechanism the case that can be brought under the most favorable experimental conditions has thus far proved to lie beyond our power to find a satisfactory scientific solution. The two most important principles which must enter into any mechanical theory for explaining the behavior of nerves in relation to electricity are, according to Hermann : ' (1) the law of electrical excitation, and (2) the law of the so-called current of action. The phenomena upon which these laws are themselves based are chiefly the phenomena of electrotonus and the phenomena of negative variation. It is a fact (see p. 114 f.) that the passage of the electrical current through a nerve-stretch produces in the nerve a changed condi- tion of excitability called electrotonic. This condition is, however, different for different parts of the nerve-stretch. It is dependent upon the nearness of each part to the electrodes, it being greatest in their vicinity. It is dependent on the strength of the polarizing 1 Handb. d. Physiol., II., i., p. 193. THEORY OF DU BOIS-KEYMOND. 227 current and on the length of the stretch through which it flows. Its intensity is greater on the side of the anode than on the side of the cathode. The condition may be said to be one of increased excitability in the region of the cathode, of diminished excitability in the region of the anode. Helmholtz found that the time of the development of the electrotonic condition is not perceptibly later than that of the electrical current which excites it ; the condition originates at the moment of making, and ceases at the moment of breaking, the polarizing current. Du Bois-Beymond concludes, thereupon, that the electrotonic condition is spread over the nerve with a speed equal to that of the process of excitation. It is also a fact (see p. 117 f.) that, in the case of the nerve-stretch as well as in that of the muscle, the galvanometer shows the pas- sage of a current when one of the electrodes is placed at its cut end and the other at its equator. It is a fact that this so-called natural current, or current of rest, is diminished by the stimula- tion of the nerve with an interrupted current, or by other means of exciting it the diminution being shown by the return of the needle of the galvanometer toward the zero-point (the so-called " negative variation "). 9. The two principal theories which have hitherto attempted to account for the above-mentioned facts are the theories of du Bois-Reymond and of Hermann. Du Bois-Beymond * assumes that in the substance of the nerve there exists an arrangement of electro-motive molecules embedded in an imperfectly conducting medium. Each molecule is like a minute battery with positive and negative poles ; and the molecules present their positive surfaces to the longitudinal surface of the nerve, their negative surfaces to the cut ends or transverse sections of the nerve. The presence of these molecules gives rise to currents in the medium which surrounds them. Owing to the imperfect conductivity of the medium, such currents flow in more or less concentric lines at some distance from each molecule. The current which exists in the nerves (exists, according to du Bois-Beymond, as natural to the nerve and previous to its injury by cross-section), and which is made obvious by the deflection of the needle of the attached galvanometer, may therefore be regarded as the resultant of the numerous unobserv- able currents belonging to the several molecules. In this way the so-called " current of rest " is to be explained. Du Bois-Beymond is forced to account for the fact that such natural currents are 1 The views of du Bois-Reymond are to be found in his Untersuchungen liber thierische Electricitat, 1848-49, and Gesammelte Abhandlungen, etc., 1875-77. 228 THE ELECTRICAL THEORIES. either exceedingly small or wholly wanting in an uninjured mus- cle by a very artificial hypothesis as to a so-called parelectronomic region at the place where the ends of the muscle come into contact with the tendons. His theory of electrotonus and of the negative variation of the nerve-current is too complicated and doubtful to be even stated here ; it is enough to say that his assumptions as to "peripolar " and "bipolar" molecules, and the effect of the elec- trical current in reversing the molecules, etc., have little to com- mend them to the practical workers in modern physics. 10. The theory which Hermann, 1 and those who agree with him, would substitute for the theory of du Bois-Reymond takes its point of starting from a discovery made by Matteucci some years ago. In 1863 this truly great investigator noticed phenom- ena similar to those of the electrotonic condition of the nerves in over-spun wires moistened with a conducting fluid. If an electri- cal current is conducted to the moist covering of such a wire, the needle of the galvanometer shows along every part of the wire the presence of a current in the same direction with the primary cur- rent, but with the strength of the former diminishing as the dis- tance increases from the points where the latter is applied to the wire. No such current arises, however, if the wire is made of amal- gamated zinc and its covering is moistened with a solution of sul- phate of zinc. It appears, then, that the electrical condition of the wire, when a current is conducted to it, depends upon the limiting surfaces of its metal centre and of its moistened covering being po- larizable. Very recently 2 Hermann has, as he thinks, still further shown the possibility of explaining all the electrotonic properties of the nerves after the analogy of Matteucci's discovery. A con- ductor consisting of a central and a covering substance, with polar- izable limiting surfaces, as soon as a momentary electric current is conducted through any portion of it begins successively to exhibit a current of the same kind at every other place in it ; the more distant the place from the one to which the current is applied the later its appearance there, so that at the most distant places such current may begin after it has for some time ceased at the primary place. Now, in an analogous manner, every nerve-fibre may be as- sumed to consist of a centre and covering substance, with polarizable limiting surfaces. In the nerve-fibre the limiting surfaces needed for the theory are perhaps actually to be found between the axis- 1 The views of Hermann may be found in his Untersuchungen zur Physiol- ogie d. Muskeln u. Nerven, 1867-68, and in numerous later papers in Pfliiger's Archiv. 2 Pfluger's Archiv, 1885, xxxv., p. 23 f. THE THEORY OF HERMANN. 229 cylinder and the medullary sheath. Griinhagen, 1 however, affirms that the polarization of the limiting surfaces of the nerve-fibre is a consequence rather than a cause of the current in electrotonus. The first and fundamental cause of this current he considers to be the characteristic difference in the resistance, as conductors, of the kernel and the covering of the nerve-stretch. The so-called "natural current," or "current of rest," Hermann does not consider it necessary to explain. What appears to be a natural current Hermann holds to be in all cases the result of in- jury. It is to be considered, then, as due to the peculiar molecu- lar condition into which certain parts of a nerve-stretch are thrown by their mechanical or chemical destruction. In fact, whenever a nerve is cut across, or any of its fibres are injured, the molecules thus disturbed begin at once to die ; they then become negative to- ward the other uninjured parts of the nerve. It is because of this change in the dying molecules that the electrical current is devel- oped. But all the parts of a wholly untouched and unexcited nerve are, according to Hermann, " isoelectric." It is not necessary to give the experimental evidence by which this investigator strives to prove his opinion ; it is enough to say that this evidence is strong, and nearly, if not quite, conclusive. Accordingly, Hermann regards the negative variation as not due to the diminution of any current previously existing, but rather as a manifestation of the electro-motive forces which come into opera- tion at the moment, and at the seat, of excitation. This current is, therefore, the only true " current of action." Its rise and flow are explained by the fact that every excited part of a nerve-stretch be- comes negative toward all the other parts. As this wave passes along the nerve-fibre, each minute portion becomes first negative and then positive toward the adjoining minute portions ; and hence the so-called "ad-terminal" and "ab-terminal currents" appear along the nerve-stretch as fast as successive parts of its substance reach their maximum of negativity. The excess of the ab-terminal over the ad-terminal current manifests itself as the so-called " neg- ative variation." The phenomena of electrotonus Hermann explains, as has already been said, upon the basis of Matteucci's experiments. An inner polarization, such as takes place between the wire and its moist- ened covering, takes place between the substance which constitutes the core of the nerve and one of its sheaths. The electrotonic cur- rent is, therefore, simply due to an escape of the polarizing cur- rent. It is wanting in the dead nerve, because the inner polariza- 1 Pfluger's Archiv, xxxv., p. 534 f. 230 THE ELECTRICAL THEORIES. tion belongs only to the nerve in its living state ; it is stopped by ligature or by crushing, because the nervous substance is thus made into dead, indifferent substance, and the functional continu- ity of the nervous core is destroyed. His detailed explanation of " tetanic action -currents " and " phasic action-currents," and of the physiological phenomena of electrotonus and catelectrotonus, need not be repeated. The one principle to which Hermann would re- duce all the electrical phenomena derived from the cut nerve- stretch is this : All excitable protoplasm, when dying or irritated, becomes negative toward its own uninjured and unirritated parts. Such is the nature of its electro-motive reaction. 11. Objections have been made to the theory of Hermann, but they can scarcely be said to be so formidable as those which he brings against the theory of du Bois-Eeymond. The most forcible of them is, perhaps, the following : If the so-called currents of rest were due solely to the negativity of the dying portion of the substance, we should not expect that the current from the equator to the cross- section would be greater than the current from a point nearer the cross- section, seeing that the resistance is greater in the former case. Hermann is himself ready to admit, 1 however, that no simple scheme of polarization will fully satisfy the conditions of the prob- lem offered by the behavior of the nerve-muscle machine under electrical stimulation. " The platinum wire, with its moist sheaths, is no model of the irritable nerve ; it is only a model of its elec- trotonic properties." We must, therefore, after the discussion of all analogies resort again to the unknown molecular constitution and properties of the substance of the nerve, as being sui generis, for our explanation of its peculiar physiological properties. Its functions are a species of molecular change, connected, to be sure, both with chemical changes and with other mechanical changes of a wave-like character, and yet unlike them all ; and these molecular changes, when the nerve is excited, are propagated from point to point along its course with a speed and according to laws which have already been stated (see Chapter III.). But further than this we cannot as yet go with confidence in affirming a mechanical the- ory of even that simplest element of the nervous mechanism for ex- perimental purposes namely, the nerve attached to the muscle and constituting the nerve-muscle machine. 2 1 See Handb. d. Physiol., II., i., p. 195 f. 8 Further information upon the two theories of Hermann and du Bois-Rey- mond may be found in Foster's Text-book of Physiology, pp. 101 ff. See, also, a brief statement of Hermann's theory in the Journal of Physiology, I., pp. 196-212. THE THEORY OF WUNDT. 231 12. A confession of ignorance might fitly close the entire dis- cussion as to the possibility at present of a precise mechanical theory of the nervous system. For on resuming the larger and more complicated inquiry, as to how the physiological functions of all the nervous organs in their mutual relations may be explained according to any known laws of molecular science, we are obliged to approach this inquiry with an acknowledged inability to deal satisfactorily even with the much simpler case of one of the ele- ments of this system. The peculiar forms and laws of the molec- ular activity of the entire nervous mechanism certainly cannot be understood until we are able to describe and explain the molecu- lar activity of a single nerve-muscle machine. A statement of an elaborate theory, framed with a view to meet the whole case, by a distinguished authority, cannot fail, however, to possess a certain interest and value. Accordingly, we shall refer briefly to the theory of Wundt. 1 Wundt begins his discussion of the mechanics (or molecular physics) of nervous substance by stating two possible ways of ap- proaching the subject. It is conceivable that we might directly investigate the chemical and physical constitution of the nervous elements, and the changes they undergo in the exercise of their physiological functions, with a view to construct a theory of so- called nerve-force by induction from such investigation. But the preferable because the much more promising way of procedure is to assume that the processes which take place in the nervous system are modes of molecular motion connected with each other, and with the forces of external nature, under the general principles of molecular physics ; and then, arguing deductively, to make such a combination and application of these principles as will serve to meet all the demands of the case. It scarcely need be said that Wundt adopts the latter method. Assuming, then, the general principles of molecular physics, and especially the law of the conservation of energy, it is possible to show how living beings may be brought under the control of these principles. Such beings, through the regularity with which the making and breaking of chemical combinations goes on within them, take a noteworthy part in the continuous process of inter- changing potential and kinetic (inner and external) energy. It is the nervous system, in all the animals that have one, from which 1 To be found, in part, in his Untersuchungen zur Mechanik der Nerven, and in later and more complete form in the chapter (vi., Part I.) " Physio- logische Mechanik der Nervensubstauz," in his Grundziige der physiologi- schen Psychologic. Leipzig, 1880. 232 THEORY OF MOLECULAR ENERGIES. this process is controlled. The process itself is a species of com- bustion ; the nervous system keeps going those functions which effect the process, regulates the setting free and distributing of the heat, and determines the muscles to movement. The source of the special activities of the nervous system itself lies in the nat- ure of the chemical combinations which compose it. The nervous system regarded as unaffected by stimuli that is, as unexcited may be theoretically compared to a fluid in a condi- tion of equilibrium. But, in fact, the nervous system is never hi a condition of perfect equilibrium. For, not only is there a ceaseless play of energy internal to this system, in which the atoms separate from the old combinations as nervous substance to form new com- binations as the same substance ; but a continuous process also goes on by which the molecules of the nervous substance are broken up to form less complex but more stable compounds. Moreover, the building of the nervous substance itself out of the nourishment brought to it is a process the reverse of that last mentioned ; it is a process, that is to say, in which the more stable chemical com- pounds of other substance are broken up and their atoms used to form the more complex but more unstable molecules of the nervous substance. The process of change from the less stable to the more stable combinations represents the setting-free of stored or poten- tial energy ; the reverse process represents the storing of energy and the vanishing of kinetic or actual energy. That energy which is made apparent by the former process "Wundt calls " positive ; " that which is stored up, when the more stable combination disap- pears, he calls "negative." Positive molecular energy of the ner- vous system is recognized as heat set free, as contraction of the muscles, etc. ; its negative molecular energy exists in the form of heat becoming latent, or of inhibitory action upon the course of excitation in the nerves, etc. In accordance with the foregoing theory of positive and negative molecular energy, as due to the chemical activity of the nervous substance, Wundt would explain the process of excitation and con- duction in the nerve-fibres. No simple conduction of motion, of course, takes place in the nerve ; but certain molecular processes, peculiar to the constitution of the nerve, are set up at one point by the stimulus, and are then conducted successively to other points along its stretch. In all cases when a nerve is irritated two classes of opposed effects are set up in its substance ; the one is directed toward the production of external energy (secretion, stimulation of the ganglion-cells, movement of the muscles, etc.), the other toward the control of the energy thus set free. The former is positive, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ENERGY. 233 the latter negative or inhibitory. The general law for all excita- tion of the nerves is, that by the application of stimulus the posi- tive as well as the negative molecular energy of the nervous sub- stance is increased. Stimulating the nerve accelerates both the recombination of the atoms of its highly complex molecules in less complex but more stable forms, and also the escape of the atoms from these forms and their return to the more complex and less stable combinations. The renewal of the nerve depends upon the restitution of the more complex molecules ; but the work which the nerve does external to itself depends upon that process of combustion in which the complex molecules break up and pass into more stable but less complex forms. The latter process involves, of course, the exhaustion of the nerve. External energy (work done outside of the nerve) can then only take place in case the positive molecular energy is more accelerated than the negative, by the application of the stimulus. The entire sum of positive molecular energy which is set free when a nerve is irritated may be reckoned as distributed in three directions : a part is spent in the continuous excitation of the nerve ; another part becomes heat ; still another part is converted into negative molecular energy. In this way the peculiar molec- ular condition which the nerve-fibre leading from the peripheral region assumes, when it is irritated, is imparted to the central re- gion of the nerve-cell. 13. The application of the foregoing theory to the central organs of the nervous mechanism requires us to take account of the fact that a greater intensity of the stimulus is needed to move a muscle through a collection of ganglion-cells than directly by stimulating the nerve-fibre connected with the muscle. We are to conclude, then, that the nervous substance of the central parts offers a far greater resistance to the conduction of the process of excitation than is offered by the nerves themselves. On the other hand, the central organs are in a condition to develop within them- selves a far greater amount of work ; that is, to convert into kinetic form a vast sum of energy stored in their chemical con- stitution. The proofs which Wundt brings forward for this view- are derived from the phenomena of summation of inhibition, and of so-called "reflex-poisons," etc. A detailed discussion of such phenomena leads to the conclusion that, when " summation " (com- pare pp. 223 ff.) takes place, the several excitations along the cen- tripetal tracts have been conducted to different sensory central regions, and have then passed from them, as a result of their being simultaneously excited, over into the same motor elements of the 234 THEORY OF MOLECULAK ENERGIES. central organ; but when "inhibition " takes place, such excitations have been conducted so as to come together and counteract each other in the same sensory central region. The external conditions of those relations which obtain among the different senses and sensations are to be found, partly in the constitution of the organs of sense, and partly in the nature of their respective stimuli. When speculating as to the molecular changes, with respect both to positive and also to negative energy, which take place in the central organs, our point of starting must be taken from a condition of equilibrium assumed to exist in their ganglion-cells. Excitation of the central organs, like irritation of the nerves, increases both kinds of nervous energy. But the positive molecular energy of the central organs is relatively little increased by a momentary excita- tion. The result of repeated excitation, however, is to make the positive condition largely predominate in the whole central region. An excited ganglion-cell is in a condition analogous to that of the nerve-stretch at the anode when a constant current is passing through it. In the nerve, as a rule, the nervous substance is used up, and the process of storing energy goes on in only a very par- tial manner. In the cells the production of the complex molecules in which energy is stored predominates, as a rule. The fundamental properties of nervous matter mechanically considered are (1) to receive external impressions in order by them to be determined in its own molecular condition ; and (2) to transform potential energy into kinetic, partly under the immedi- ate, and partly under the progressive, influence of these impres- sions. Wundt also proposes an elaborate and highly speculative view of the molecular constitution and functions of the ganglion-cells. Every such cell possesses, he thinks, two regions (although the word " regions " is not to be interpreted locally). These regions are called " peripheral " and "central," because the former is as- sumed to stand in more intimate relations to the peripheral ner- vous substance, with respect to its own reactions under stimula- tion. Excitations which reach the central region of a ganglion-cell induce a propagation of the processes set up in this region to the other or peripheral region. In the same way do excitations which first touch the peripheral region necessitate the spreading of the form of molecular energy set free here over into the central region. When a process of excitation is frequently conducted in a definite direction through some ganglion-cell, such direction is favorably disposed toward the conduction of future excitations which may reach the same cell. Whether the excitation of any particular ACTION DEPENDENT ON STRUCTURE. 235 nerve-fibre connected with a ganglion-cell results in an excitatory or an inhibitory effect depends upon the nature of its connection with the cell. But we refrain from further statement of a theory so largely con- jectural. Nothing remains but to repeat a confession of igno- rance and of inability even to suggest a satisfactory solution for so complex a problem in molecular physics as is offered by the human nervous system. 14. A review of various molecular theories proposed to account for the nervous mechanism, either as a whole or in any of its parts, makes plain the important fact that such theories are all obliged to assume the origin and continuance of a peculiar molecular structure for this mechanism. In other words, no attempt to explain how the nervous system acts can avoid the conclusion that the determining factor in the explanation must be found in what the nervous system is. The physiological functions of the nerve depart when the nerve dies. The nerve dies when it is severed from the ganglion-cell. Both cell and nerve must, therefore, con- stitute a living molecular unity, in order that their normal physio- logical functions may be performed. The explanation of these functions assumes the molecular constitution of the organs them- selves. But how shall we explain, in accordance with the known laws of molecular physics, the origin and preservation of such a mo- lecular constitution ? It is the business of biology rather than of physiology to attempt an answer to this question. But the question itself asks from science the performance of a task no smaller than that of framing a mechanical theory of life. Biological science can, as yet, do little toward framing such a theory. Throughout our en- tire discussion of the nervous mechanism we have carefully avoided raising an inquiry as to the nature of life, as to the source and con- ditions of that very molecular constitution which determines the nature and working of this mechanism. We have simply assumed and argued that, taking the nervous system for what it really is and really does, its structure and functions admit of scientific ex- planation, so far as such explanation is possible at all, only when they are regarded as belonging to a molecular mechanism. The question of a mechanical theory for the origin and constitution of living organisms in general lies outside of the inquiries of Physio- logical Psychology. 15. One other important question has also thus far been avoided. What is the relation of the mind to the working of the nervous mechanism ? Can the mind set this molecular mechanism at work, or can it in any way determine the character of its func- 236 THEORY OF MOLECULAR ENERGIES. tions ? As far as our consideration of the nervous system has gone hitherto, all might very well have been the same without the exist- ence of a single act of conscious thought or feeling occurring in any relation whatever to this system. Given the molecular mechan- ism as it is constituted and conserved by the forces which control as long as life continues ; and given the necessary impact of out- side forces upon the end-organs, and the proper changes of blood within the central organs ; and it has been assumed that this mech- anism would exercise its functions in ways thus far described. But the consideration of another class of phenomena is now to be introduced ; these are the phenomena of human consciousness, the phenomena of Mind. The question whether such phenomena can be true causes of any of the changes in the molecular mechanism is a part of the general question as to the correlations that exist between two classes of facts. The answer to such general question belongs to the following divisions of our work. PART SECOND. CORRELATIONS OF THE NERVOUS MECHANISM AND THE MIND. CHAPTER I. THE LOCALIZATION OF CEEEBEAL FUNCTION. 1. ORDINARY observation recognizes the fact that the phenomena of consciousness are more or less definitely correlated Avith the condition of the body. Certain alterations in our mental states, on account of the injury of any of its masses, as well as a constant de- pendence of those states upon the way some of the masses stand related to each other and to the outside world, impress the fact upon our daily experience. It is by no means so obvious that the ner- vous substance has any peculiar relation to the thoughts and feelings of the mind. For the functions of the nervous system are not ex- ercised in giving information as to itself, its own condition and changes. By aid of these functions we have presented in con- sciousness a more or less clear picture of the condition and changes of the superficial parts of the body. In the same way a knowledge is gained of the successive states of tension belonging to the muscles in movement, and even though rather obscurely of the place and condition of the internal organs. But as long as they are healthy and excited with only a moderate intensity of their stimuli, the nerves do not even reveal their own existence ; and when they are injured or unduly excited, the notice they furnish of the fact comes in the form of painful feeling which we have learned to localize, not in the nervous substance itself but in the adjacent parts of muscle and skin. Attention may be called, how- ever, to the peripheral nerves by the accident or the dissecting- knife which exposes them to sight. In the case of the central nervous organs, and especially in the case of the brain, there is little in ordinary experience which leads to a suspicion of their signifi- cance or even of their existence. It is not very strange, then, that no general recognition of the supreme importance of the brain, in relation to the phenomena of consciousness, is to be found in early history. It is true that Plutarch '' and Theophrastus a inform us of the opinion of the 1 De Placitis Philosophorum, IV. , 17, 1. 2 De Sensu, 25 f. 240 GENERAL FUNCTION OF THE BRAIN. physician Alcmaeon, who is said to have been a younger contem- porary of Pythagoras, and who regarded the brain as the common meeting-place of the senses. The same view is also ascribed to the celebrated Hippocrates. Later on Plato accepted it. But Aris- totle, 1 the greatest of all thinkers in antiquity, the son of a phy- sician, especially educated in physical science, and well acquainted for the time in the dissection of animals, regarded the brain as a lump of cold substance, quite unfit to be the seat and organ of the sensus communis. This important office he ascribed rather to the heart. The brain he considered to be chiefly useful as the source of fluid for lubricating the eyes, etc. 2. The opinion of Exneiy however, who supposes that feeling in no way immediately informs us that we think with the head, still less with the brain or the cortex of the cerebrum, seems some- what extreme. Concerning the contents of the cranial cavity, indeed, we get no direct information from the feelings connected with the exercise of its functions. But we certainly localize in the head certain phenomena of consciousness that are inextricably inter- woven with the processes of thought. The act of attention results in feelings which indicate that the muscles of the eye are being in- nervated ; or in the more indefinite and diffused sense of strain produced by contracting the skin of the forehead and adjacent parts of the face. The special sensations of hearing, smelling, and tasting, which impress so strongly our conscious life, are frequently referred to the head. The same thing is true of many of the sen- sations of sight particularly of such as appear when the eyes are closed, in the form of after-images, or spectra, or indefinite and changing color-spots, seated in the upper front part of the face. Moreover, that inchoate and sometimes half-articulated language, with which we support our trains of thought, even when we are not conscious of resorting to the expedient of " talking to ourselves," is felt to be going on within the head. When one has been engaged for some time in intense thought, or in eager and concentrated observation, one is suddenly made aware of more or less painful feelings which are somewhat indefinitely ascribed to the same cerebral region. Men commonly lean the head upon the hand in supporting meditation ; or rub it vigorously to awaken the powers of memory and reasoning ; or stroke it to relieve the disagreeable sensations which follow severe mental excitement. Headache, of more or less intensity, thus becomes associated with 1 See De Partibus Animalium, 652, b. 5; (II., 7); 656, b. 22 (II., 10); De Juvent., 467, b. 28 ; and De Anima, III., 1 and 2. 2 See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 192. NEED OF ARTERIAL BLOOD. 241 active exercise of the intellect. The head is wearied with thought ; and not only so, but also with intense physical exercise. The dis- comfort which bodily strain produces in the hinder regions of the head are an indication, although of only a very general kind, that processes have gone on in that locality which are of great impor- tance to the succeeding states of consciousness. All this apparent testimony of immediate feeling is, doubtless, somewhat exaggerated in an age so distinctively " nervous" as our own ; and this fact may, perhaps, account in part for the inclination of the ancients to em- phasize the more obvious connection of mental phenomena with the heart, and other lower visceral organs, to the neglect of all connection of these phenomena with the brain. But it cannot well be doubted that a certain amount of testimony from immediate feeling as to the important relation which exists between the state of mind and the contents of the cranial cavity, belongs to all human experience. However uncertain the witness of immediate feeling upon the point in question may be, very little observation of others is needed to amplify and confirm its witness. We are not infrequently led to notice how quickly and profoundly the states of consciousness are changed by injuries to the brain. The effect of a blow upon the head in suspending consciousness is decisive of this question. The intimate local connection between the organs of sense and the brain leads naturally to the conclusion that the avenues of sensa- tion and of perception have in the latter a kind of gathering-place, as it were. It is but a step from this conclusion to a recognition of the truth that the physiological significance of the contents of the cranial cavity consists in their affording a field upon which all the impressions of sense can meet together, and so furnish the basis and material of comparative thought. Indeed, it was this line of in- quiry which probably led certain ancient anatomists, like Herophilus and Galen, to locate the soul, or psychical principle, in the brain. 3. A great multitude of physical considerations, advanced by modern science, place beyond doubt the supreme importance of the brain in its influence upon the phenomena of consciousness. It has already been stated (Part I., Chapter HE., 7) that the free circulation of arterial blood, with its supply of oxygen, is a necessary condition for the fulfilment of the functions of all the central organs ; this necessity is especially marked in the case of the brain. The stoppage of one of the great arteries leading to this organ, either by compression in the neck, or by embolism at some point along its course, at once produces profound dis- turbances and even complete cessation of consciousness. It has been calculated that, while the weight of the entire encephalon is 16 242 GENERAL FUNCTION OF THE BRAIN. only about one-forty-fifth of that of the body, the supply of blood used up there is not less than about one-eighth of the whole supply. This expenditure is indicative of the large amount of work done by the intercranial organs. More delicate measurements seem to show that the temperature rises and falls in the whole cerebral area, or at particular cir- cumscribed regions of the cortex, in close connection with the psychical activities. Thus Dr. Lombard found, by measurements with exact thermo-electric apparatus, that the temperature of the head during waking hours varies rapidly, though slightly (less than y^j C.) ; and that these variations " appear to be connected with different degrees of cerebral activity. . . . Every cause that attracts the attention a noise, or the sight of some person or other object produces elevation of temperature. An elevation of temperature also occurs under the influence of an emotion, or during an interesting reading aloud." Similar examinations have been carried still further by Schiff, ' who has applied extremely del- icate thermoscopic instruments directly to the cerebral substance of certain animals (corap. Part L, Chapter III, 21). He finds that the arrival of sensorial impressions is followed by a rise of temperature, in certain special areas of the cortical substance, where as he supposes these impressions are diffused ; he also con- cludes that any resulting psychical activity is itself connected with a still further rise of temperature than that which the sensorial impressions alone engender. Schiff 's conclusions, therefore, point not only to the localization in the entire brain of functions connected with the phenomena of conscious psychical life, but also to some distribution of such functions among its various areas. In the same general direction are the conclusions of Byasson 2 and others, as to an increase of waste in the tissues of this organ, which corresponds, to some extent, at least, with the amount of thought accomplished. This investigator found that the quantity of sul- phates and phosphates excreted, in comparison with the quantity estimated as entering into his diet, was notably increased in pro- portion to the amount of his mental work. That is to say, in con- nection with an increase in the number and intensity of the psychical operations stands an increase in the functional activity of the cerebral cells, as shown by the expenditure of their phos- phorized constituents. 3 1 Archives de Physiologie, 1870, p. 451. 2 In the Jour. d. Anat. de Robin, 1869, p. 557 f. 3 See the chapter of Luys on the Physico-chemical Phenomena of Cere- bral Activity ; The Brain and its Functions. RELATIVE WEIGHT OF BRA^N". 243 4. Comparative anatomy also indicates the importance of the re- lation between the size, structure, and functions of the intercranial nervous mass and the phenomena of mind. It shows, first of all, a general but indefinite correspondence between the size and weight of the brain of any species of animal, as compared with the weight of its entire mass, and the place of the same species in the scale of intelligence. This fact is roughly exhibited by the following com- parative table : 1 RELATION OF THE WEIGHT OP THE BRAIN TO THE WEIGHT OF THE BODY. Land tortoise . .. 1 2,240 Eagle . . -| 160 Shad ... 1 1,837 Picreon . 1 104 Tadpole ... 1 720 Rat . . . 1 82 Elephant 1 500 Gibbon 1 48 Salamander .. . 1 380 Young cat 1 39 Sheep . . . 1 351 Sai ape . . 1 25 Doubtless other tables might be compiled which would lead to less satisfactory conclusions than the one given above. Even in this table we note that the elephant stands lower than the sala- mander or the sheep, both of which animals are, in fact, far in- ferior to the elephant in intelligence. Large allowance must also be made in certain cases for peculiarities of physical structure ; for example, the tortoise is rated lower than he would be were it not for his heavy shell. The law itself is confessedly subject to re- markable and unexplained exceptions ; at best it holds good only in a very general way. For example, the relative weight of the brain is not greatly different in the dolphin, in the baboon, and in man. It is much greater in the infancy and youth of the human species than in middle life or old age. In the male child at birth it is about as one to six or seven (according to Tiedemann, 1 to 5.85 in the male, and 1 to 6.5 in the female). The brain grows with great rapidity for the first few years the increase during the first year being estimated at about one cubic centimeter daily. But the rest of the body increases so much more rapidly that by the end of the second" year it is about 1:14 ; by the end of the third year, 1:18. It increases in absolute weight until well on into middle life, and then after middle life diminishes at about the average rate of one 1 Taken from Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 193, as compiled by Exner, on the basis of the works, in part of Cams, and in part of J. Miiller. The figures of comparative weight between the brain and the body are some- what differently given by other authorities. 244 GENERAL FUNCTION OF THE BRAIN. ounce in a decade. The average relative weight of the adult brain is one-fortieth or one-fiftieth. Tiederaann found that the relative weight of the brain is dependent upon the absolute weight of the body, and is relatively greatest with light persons. The human brain is, however, absolutely heavier than that of any of the ani- mals except the elephant (8-10 Ibs.) and the whale (5-6 Ibs.). Much pains has been taken, by actually weighing different human brains, or by calculating their weight on the basis of careful cranial measurements, to establish a law connecting the amount of the intercranial nervous mass with the comparative intelligence of races and of individuals. 1 The average weight of the brain of the adult European is, for the male, from 4G to 52 ounces ; for the fe- male, from 42 to 46 ounces. Boyd gives the average weight of the brain of the male, at the period of life when it is most developed (twenty- five to forty years of age), as 46.8 ounces (1,321 grams, 91 centigrams). This difference between the sexes is not wholly de- pendent on difference in bulk of body, but is an important sexual distinction. The brain of man is on the average ten per cent, above that of woman ; the difference in average stature is about eight per cent. Many human brains rise above the upper average ranges ; others fall below the lower average ranges ; and yet no marked peculiarities of mental development are necessarily connected with these variations. Considerable quantities of the substance of the brain may be lost (at any rate from some areas of the cortical sur- face) without perceptibly changing the mental life. In 278 cases of males, the maximum weight of brain was found to be 65 ounces, the minimum 34 ounces ; in 191 cases of females, the maximum was 56 ounces, the minimum 31 ounces. 2 Numerous instances of large excess in the average weight of brain-mass by individuals eminent for intelligence are on record : for example, Ityron scarcely under 79 ounces ; Cromwell, only 77 grains less, or 78.8 ounces (although Vulpian thinks that the national spirit has exaggerated both these instances) ; Cuvier, 64.5 ounces ; Abercrombie, 63 ounces ; Spurzheim, 55 ounces ; Sir J. Y. Simpson, 54 ounces ; Web- ster, 53.5 ounces ; Agassiz, 53.4 ounces ; Chalmers, 53 ounces. Other persons of eminence, however, have had brains of only aver- age, or of under average weight ; thus C. F. Hermann, 46.5 ounces, and J. F. L. Hausmann, 43.3 ounces. Moreover, brains of high weight not infrequently occur without evidence of unusual mental capacity, or even in the case of those mentally inferior. Record is 1 On the relations of the Brain with respect to weight and mass, see Schwalbe, Lehrb. d. Neurologic, ii., pp. 589 ff. Erlangen, 1881. 8 Results obtained by Sims, Clendinning, Tiedemaun, and J. Reid. BKAINS OF DIFFERENT KACES. 245 made of four male brains, belonging to persons of no repute for in- tellectual ability, which ranged from 62.75 ounces to 61 ounces ; of another such, which weighed 60.75 ounces ; of the brain of a boy of fourteen which weighed 60 ounces. In the West Riding Asy- lum ' for the Insane, out of 375 males examined, the weight of the brain in 30 cases was 55 ounces or upward ; out of 300 females examined, in 26 cases it was 50 ounces or upward. Several persons afflicted with dementia were found to have brains weighing more than 60 ounces. On the contrary, idiots, almost without exception, have brains far below the average in weight ; as a rule, the braiii of such an unfortunate does not weigh so much as 30 ounces. Cases of microcephalous idiots are on record whose brains weighed only 10.5, or even 8.05 ounces. Here, again, however, singular ex- ceptions must be admitted ; for in a few cases the brains of idiots have reached the average weight, and have even, in rare cases, con- siderably surpassed it. Although the data adduced to show that the average weight of brain in the more highly civilized races is greater than in the savage races, are by no means abundant or conclusive, yet they are suffi- cient to create a reasonably strong presumption in favor of this view. Calculating from the size of the cranial cavity, as ascertained by measurement of a large number of skulls, it is inferred that the average weight of brain in the African, Australian, and Oceanic races generally, falls from 1 to 4 ounces below that of the more highly civilized European. It is further noted that there is almost a complete absence of cases rising above the higher ranges above 54 ounces, for example ; and that there is not the same difference between the two sexes in the uncultivated as in the cultivated peoples. Davis calculated the average weight of brain among the Chinese to be about equal to that of the Caucasian race in Europe ; among the Sandwich Islanders to be some thirty grams less. The surprisingly low weight of the brain of the Hindus is in part a function of their smaller weight and bulk of body. It may fairly be urged in objection, that by the method of measuring skulls taken somewhat at random we should be likely to find a note- worthy absence of such exceptional cases in certain quarters among the European races ; and that the relative increase in size of the female brain among uneducated peoples is probably, in part at least, the result of the response of the nervous system to the demand made upon it for the Hard labor performed by the women among such peoples. Any law which refers the intensity and range of the mental 3 For these facts see the Encyclopaedia Britannica, ninth ed., I., p. 879 f. 246 GENERAL FUNCTION OF THE BRAIN. activities directly to the size and weight of the nervous mass of the brain must, therefore, be held only very loosely. It is to be ex- pected that many unexplained exceptions will meet us, whether we compare men with the other animals, or certain races of men with others, or individual men with one another. No intelligent physiologist would now think of making mere mass the test of mental capacity. 5. A more intimate relation of dependence exists between the amount of intelligence and the complex structure of the brain as arising to a large extent from the development of the cerebral hemispheres that is, from their relative size and expanse, and from the number and depth of their convolutions. In other words, wealth of expanded and convoluted cerebral hemispheres is, in some general way, a measure of the richness and intensity of mental life. This conviction becomes stronger the more carefully the comparative anatomy of the cerebrum, and the development of the cerebral hemispheres in the human embryo, are examined. The forms of brain found permanently in fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and the lower mammals, are extremely similiar to those shown in succession by the developing brain of the higher mammals, and especially of man. The most distinctive feature of man's superior brain is the marked development in the size, num- ber, and depth of the convolutions of the hemispheres. In fishes generally, both cerebrum and cerebellum are very small ; but the ganglia connected with the organs of sense, especially of vision, are relatively large. In amphibia the cerebral hemispheres are rel- atively enlarged ; are advanced backward still farther in reptiles ; while in birds the vesicles of the mid-brain are partially hidden by the development of the hemispheres. In the lower mammals the enlargement of these same organs by growth backward continues, and their two parts become connected by a commissure ; but they still remain comparatively meagre in size and simple in structure, without much distinction of lobes or division into convolutions. It is only in the most elaborately developed brains of the higher mammals that the occipital lobe enlarges backward so as to cover mid-brain, cerebellum, and medulla oblongata ; and that the frontal lobe spreads forward over the nasal cavities so as to constitute a development of forehead. Meantime the convolutions apparent on the cerebral surface increase in number and depth. ^he theory suggested by comparative anatomy is confirmed by the probable view of Meynert, that the whole of this cortical region of the cerebrum is a great " projection-field " on which the sensory impulses are marshalled and systematically ordered (to serve, as it THE MEASUREMENTS OF WAGNER. 247 were, for the physical basis of mental phenomena), as they arrive from the peripheral regions and are distributed over the outgoing motor tracts. Certain striking exceptions to the principle of this theory must, however, be acknowledged. Within each great group of animals considerable variations occur in the degree of cerebral convolution, such that it cannot be said accurately to measure the degree of intelligence. For example, among mammals the in- sectivora have brains "poorest" in convolutions, the herbivora are "richest," and the carnivora stand between; the ruminants, although rather dull and incapable of being taught, have numer- ous and deep convolutions enough to rank them much higher than their real intelligence deserves. The marmoset, on the other hand, the relative weight of whose brain is as 1 to 18, shows a compara- tively smooth arid non-convoluted surface, in striking contrast with that of other monkeys. Trustworthy data are as yet wanting to place beyond doubt the probable opinion that the brains of less highly civilized races and less highly intellectual individuals are relatively poor in develop- ment of the cerebral hemispheres. The human embryo is, indeed, an illustration in miniature of the truth of this opinion ; the older it becomes the more distinctly marked are the lobes of the cere- bral hemispheres, and the more numerous and deep are their con- volutions. The brains of idiots are said, as a rule, to be poor in convolutions ; this fact is doubtless connected with the embryonic condition in which many of them have remained through arrested development. Hermann Wagner, 1 on the basis of measurements made by his father, undertook to estimate the comparative total surface of the cerebral hemispheres of four brains, viz.: of two males of noteworthy intelligence (Gauss, the mathematician, and Fuchs, the physician), of a male laborer (Krebs), and of a female in middle life. By weighing carefully the amount of gold-foil laid on uniformly, which was required completely and closely to en- velop all the convolutions of these brains, Wagner concluded that the area of concealed surface was, in each case, approximately equal to that exposed. The total surfaces of the four brains were thus found to measure of Gauss, 2,196 square centimeters; of Fuchs, 2,210 ; of the woman, 2,041 ; of Krebs, 1,877. It is a tempt- ing but rather insecure generalization which concludes from so few cases that the richness of the cerebral convolutions (the total surface, both that exposed and that concealed by the sulci), is a general direct measure of the intelligence. 6. Other interesting attempts have been made to measure the 1 Maassbestimmungen d. Oberflache d. grossen Gehirns. Cassel, 1864. 248 GENERAL FUNCTION OF THE BRAIN. intelligence of the animal by the relative size and structure of the intercranial nervous mass, and so, definitely, to establish a direct relation between the two ; we notice especially those of J. Miiller, ' and of Meynert. 8 The great physiologist, Miiller, held that the position of an animal in the scale of intelligence may be estimated by comparing the hemispheres of his brain with the corpus quad- rigeminum. According as the latter organ is relatively large, and lies behind the hemispheres, uncovered by them, the animal is low in the scale of intelligence ; according as the hemispheres increase in size, and so envelop and bury beneath them the relatively small corpora quadrigemina, the animal stands high in that scale. This statement, however, scarcely covers anything more explicit than the general fact that relative increase of the cerebral hemispheres is indicative of progressive mental life. Meynert has pointed out other important relations between parts of the brain, by which he proposes to measure the intelligence. In the entire mass of the crura cerebri we may recognize two parts, an upper {tegmenium), which stands in direct connection with the optic thalami and the corpora quadrigemina, and a lower (crusla), which is connected through the lenticular nuclei of the striate bodies with the cere- brum. Now the greater the hemispheres are in comparison with the corpora quadrigemina, the greater must the mass of the crusta be in comparison with that of the tegmentum. The development of the pons Varolii is also essentially dependent on that of the crusta, for the fibres of the latter enter into the former ; the arching of the pons is therefore connected with the development of the hemi- spheres. In general, then, the relative development of the entire tract represented by the crusta, or lower part of the crura cerebri, and the nucleus lenticularis, the fibres of which expand in the cere- brum, is according to Meynert a measure of an animal's intelli- gence. In man the mass of the crusta on the level of the corpora quadrigemina exceeds that of the tegmentum ; in the other mam- mals the reverse is true. 3 7. The above-mentioned facts of comparative anatomy, with many others similar, show plainly the unique significance which the masses of the brain, and especially the cerebral hemispheres, have, as related to the phenomena of self-conscious mind. They may be supplemented and confirmed through other facts furnished by physiology, especially of the experimental kind. Upon this point, 1 Handb. d. Physiol. d. Menschen, 1844, I., p. 702 f. 'Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., LX., Hi. (1869), pp. 447-462. 3 For a brief but judicious discussion of this subject, see Briicke, Vorles- ungen iiber Physiologic, 1884, II., pp. 52 ff. FUNCTION OF CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES. 249 for the present, reference is simply made to the results of inves- tigation as already set forth in Part I. (see especially Chapter IV.). Physiology demonstrates that the nervous impulses, so far as they result in sensation, pass along centripetal tracts which con- verge from every portion of the periphery toward the brain ; and that, so far as they result in motion following upon idea and voli- tion, they pass along centrifugal tracts diverging from the same central masses. It thus confirms the same theory which studies of the anatomical structure of the nervous system suggest, namely, that in these masses, and especially upon the cortex of the cere- brum, is the common meeting-place of both kinds of impulses. The section or injury of any nerve-tract, even in the spinal cord, apart from indirect and secondary influences, does not affect the psychical functions. In such an event, the parts of the body lying periphe- rally from the point of interruption are simply withdrawn from all direct connection with sensations or volitions. Sensory impulses, then, no longer occasion sensations ; ideas of motion and volitions to motion, of the parts thus disconnected, become of no effect in producing the customary result. It has also been made obvious that, in proportion as the masses of an animal's brain are removed or incapacitated from performing their functions, the evidences of a varied and complex mental experience are diminished. The simple spinal cord of a frog, acting as a nervous mechanism, will perform a few wonderful feats ; joined with the medulla oblongata, optic lobes, and other lower parts of the brain, it will give largely in- creased signs of psychical phenomena ; it would not be claimed, however, that the cerebral hemispheres of this animal relatively insignificant as they are when compared with those of the higher animals are of no special importance for its highest psychical life. Essentially the same thing, though in more emphatic form, is true of all animals of a higher grade of intelligence. 8. In the case of man, the cerebral hemispheres are, appar- ently, the only portions of the nervous system, between the size, condition, and molecular activity of which and the phenomena of consciousness there is a direct correlation. If, then, we are to speak of mental activities as " localized " at all, the locality must be in the cortex of the cerebrum. The position that, in the case of man, the spinal cord and all the intercranial organs below the cerebral hemispheres, are incapable of acting as the immediate physical basis of mental states, is confirmed even by those experiments upon other animals, which seem at first sight to discredit it. The hypoth- esis that consciousness has a seat in the spinal cord of the frog ; that, in fact, we may properly speak of the decapitated animal as 250 GENERAL FUNCTION OF THE BEAIN. having a soul has been urged by eminent physiologists (Pfliiger, for example). That the cord alone is capable of various purpose- ful activities, such as serve, under certain circumstances, as signs of a psychical experience, may be demonstrated by experiment (comp. Part I, Chapter IV., 4 ff.). But unless one is prepared to maintain that all purposeful activity, as resulting from excited ner- vous substance, must be correlated with phenomena of conscious sensation and volition, one can scarcely assume with confidence that such phenomena accompany the movements of the decapitated frog. What the nervous mechanism will do, when set agoing by the appropriate stimuli, depends not only on its original structure, but also on its acquired habits of action. That this law holds good even for the mechanism of the hemispheres of the brain is obvious from various facts. Stimulating those regions of the cerebral cor- tex which are connected with definite groups of muscles, in the case of the adult animal (for example, a dog), does not call out the same responses in the animal newly born (that is, under nine or ten days old). The case of the bird which has lost its cerebral hemispheres, and which executes motions by means of the lower basal ganglia, that seem to indicate a complex psychical life (comp. Part I, Chapter IV., 20) is less easy of solution. Are we to consider such an animal still capable of "sensation," " perception," and "vo- lition ? " If this question means whether any phenomena continue to occur such as correspond to those conscious experiences of our own to which we apply the above-mentioned words, then we must confess our inability to answer it. In general, we know extremely little of the conscious mental life of the lower animals. What we conjecture is wholly dependent on the interpretation, given in terms of our human consciousness, to motions of their bodies resembling those which express definite conscious states in ourselves. But a large part of our own bodily activity is ordinarily not definitely correlated with any con- scious mental activity ; for example, breathing, winking, swallow- ing, changing the posture of the body in sleep and in states of profound meditation, and especially the very complex operations involved in walking, singing, playing on musical instruments, or handling a tool, etc. In all these and similar cases, we find that the intricate and purposeful play of the mechanism is by no means necessarily connected with a corresponding series of conscious sen- sations and volitions. But in proportion as the hemispheres of an animal's brain become relatively developed, not only their abso- lute but also their relative significance is increased. The influence LOSS OF THE CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES. 251 of the brain proper upon the voluntary movements of an animal is greater, the higher the animal stands in the scale of cerebral development and of intelligence. A frog, or a fowl, deprived of its hemispheres, can do what is quite impossible for a dog or an ape in the same condition. If, then, man's nervous mechanism, especially in case it has been trained to elaborate co-ordinated func- tions, can, without any corresponding accompaniment of mental phenomena, accomplish so much which appears significant of the most elaborate psychical activities; a fortiori, it is likely that we may make this mechanism, working without consciousness, account for most of what is done by the hen or pigeon without its cerebral hemispheres. Moreover, experimental physiology undoubtedly tends toward accounting more and more fully for the most com- plex bodily motions under the terms of physical mechanism. The most marked result of an animal's loss of the cerebral hemispheres is the sudden and great, or total departure of its intelligence. This fact is, of course, confirmatory of the impres- sion that the functions of these hemispheres, and of them alone, constitute the physical basis of its intelligence. We confess, however, our inability to affirm that the " psychical life " of every animal is inseparably bound to its continued possession of these organs. There may possibly be a varied psychical life of animals that have no brain. Yet in the case of the higher mammals, and especially in the case of man, we need not hesitate to affirm the probability of such an inseparable connection. The physical basis of the phenomena of human consciousness is pre-eminently, if not exclusively, the convoluted cortex of the cerebrum. 9. It is impossible, accordingly, tg avoid raising the inquiry whether some more definite scheme of the localization of cerebral functions may not be discovered. The cerebral cortex is itself a very complex organ, or system of organs. Its different regions are marked by comparatively slight, and yet not insignificant, dif- ferences of structure ; they stand in different local relations and nervous connections with one another and with the ganglia lying below. This outlying rind of gray nervous matter is, of course, not a homogeneous mass. It is made up of innumerable nervous elements combined in various ways and multiform connections. It may be regarded, then, as a complex of organs. The question therefore arises : Have the different members of this complex of organs different relations to definite motor activities in the pe- ripheral regions, and to the various phenomena of conscious men- tal life ? or, in other words : Have different parts of the cere- bral hemispheres all the same office and value in relation to the life 252 EVIDENCE FOR LOCALIZATION. of sensation and voluntary motion ? This is the question generally understood under the term "the localization of cerebral func- tion." 10. Most of our definite knowledge concerning the functions of the other parts of the nervous mechanism creates a presumption in favor of some localization of cerebral functions. All the different parts of this mechanism are, indeed, constructed by combining variously a few elements of essentially the same structure ; all of them likewise are capable of exercising essentially the same neural functions. But each part of this mechanism has also its special functions. Thus we found that the different nerves become classi- fied functionally ; some are motor, voluntary or involuntary, some inhibitory, some secretory, some sensory, etc. Hints of a certain kind of classification may be discovered for the smaller ganglia or col- lections of nerve-cells. In making transverse sections of the cord, different regions with different functions appear. Considered lon- gitudinally, the cord is capable of being more or less definitely divided into several so-called centres, with specifically different functions. Localized centres, where specific kinds of reflex-motor activity have their particular seats, are fairly crowded together in the medulla oblongata. All the lower parts of the encephalon appear subject, in a measure, to the principle of localization. Shall we, then, stop short in our attempts at differencing the functions of the locally separate parts of the nervous system just at the point where we reach the most complex and extended organ, or rather collection of organs, which this system contains ? 11. Notwithstanding the strong presumption in favor of the localization of cerebral function, the beginnings of a successful attempt to establish this theory are only about fifteen years old. The doctrines of Gall, Spurzheim, and others in the older school of phrenologists, proved so inconclusive as to bring contempt upon subsequent attempts to divide the hemispheres of the brain into different functional areas. Moreover, certain indisputable facts seemed to render impossible the assured beginnings of a theory of cerebral localization. Considerable portions of the human brain, it was found, might be lost without destroying any one .sensory or motor function. Moreover, the gray matter of the cerebral hemi- spheres, it was then thought, could not be directly excited by elec- tricity or by other forms of stimuli. The greatest experimenters in physiology, such as Longet, Magendie, Flourens, Matteucci, van Deen, Budge, and Schiff, declared against the localizing of cerebral function. In 1842 Longet 1 affirmed that he had experimented upon 1 Anatomie et physiologie du systeme nerveux, etc., Paris, 1842, i., p. 644 f. EXPERIMENTS OF FRITSCH AND HITZIG. 253 the cortical substance of dogs, rabbits, and kids, had irritated it me- chanically, cauterized it with potash, nitric acid, etc., and had passed galvanic currents through it in different directions, without obtaining any sign whatever of resulting muscular contraction. In the same year Flourens ' asserted, on the basis of numerous experiments in extirpation, that the lobes of the cerebrum perform their functions with their whole mass ; that there is no special seat for any of the cerebral activities ; and that even a small remnant of the hemi- spheres can serve all the uses of their collective functions. So great was the authority of the distinguished names just men- tioned, that their confident opinions gained general credence. The evidence brought forward by Broca and others seemed, however, to show some special connection between a single convolution of the frontal lobe and the complex activities of articulate speech ; and the anatomist, Meynert, held the opinion that the structure and connections of the cerebrum show its anterior portion to be in general used for motor, its posterior for sensory functions. In 1867 Eckhard repeated the significant observation which had been made by Haller and Zinn more than a century before : namely, that, on removing parts of the cortical substance of an animal's brain, convulsive movements occur in its extremities. 12. It was not until 1870 that the "epoch-making" experi- ments of Fritsch and Hitzig 2 began the modern era of investiga- tion into this subject. These observers announced the fact that the cerebral cortex of dogs is, at least in certain minute areas of it, ex- citable by electricity. They pointed out the further fact that, while some parts of the convexity of the cerebrum are capable of motor excitation and others not, the motor parts lie in general to the front, the non-motor to the rear of this convexity. By stimulating with an electrical current the so-called motor parts, co-ordinated contractions of the muscles in the opposite half of the body are obtained. Of such so-called "motor centres" they indicated, in their first announcement, the following five : One for the muscles of the neck, another for the extension and adduction of the fore- limb, another for the bending and rotation of the same limb, another for the hind-limb, and lastly one for the face. From such facts they drew the conclusion that the principle announced by 1 Recherches experimentales sur les proprietes et les fonctions du systeme nerveux, etc., p. 99 f. 2 See the article by G. Fritsch and E. Hitzig in the Archiv f. Anat., Phy- siol., etc., 1870, pp. 300-332 ; and subsequent articles by Hitzig in the same Archiv, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1876 ; also his work, Untersuchungen iiber das Gehirn, Berlin, 1874. 254 EVIDENCE FOR LOCALIZATION. Flourens is demonstrably false. We must rather admit, say they, that " certainly several psychical functions, and probably all, are shown to have their point of entrance into matter or of origin from it at circumscribed centres of the cerebral cortex." J The same principle was subsequently defended at length by Hitzig, and the number of so-called cerebral centres increased. The most note- worthy facts which these experimenters first made clear and de- monstrable have since been verified by many investigators. Many of these facts may, with care and skill, be verified by any observer. Dr. Ferrier in particular has used the method of Fritsch and Hitzig to map out the hemispheres of the brain of the monkey into no fewer than fifteen kinds of centres. The testimony of human pa- thology, and the evidence of comparative anatomy and of histology, have also been largely drawn upon either to confirm or to confute the conclusions originally based on experiments with animals. Be- fore considering the conclusions themselves, it is necessary to understand the true nature and extent of the various kinds of evi- dence. 13. Exner 2 has well said that " a physiology of the cerebral cortex, in the sense in which there is a physiology of the muscle, etc., scarcely exists at the present time." The reasons for such a deficiency lie partly in the very nature of this organ and the place it holds with- in the animal economy ; as well as partly, perhaps, in certain prej- udices which have hindered the physical theory of a material struct- ure so intimately related to the action of the mind. The cerebral cortex of the animals is experimentally approached only by over- coming immense difficulties. Moreover, those physical and chemi- cal processes of the cerebral substances, to which we must look for any strictly scientific understanding of its physiology, are placed almost utterly beyond reach of investigation. Reasoning must fill up with conjecture the great gaps that lie between a very complex series of physical occurrences, only a part of which are observable, on the one side, and on the other, an equally complex group of psychical occurrences. The latter belong to a different order of phenomena from the former ; and, moreover, in the case of the lower animals which must be selected almost exclusively for ex- perimentwe know nothing of these psychical occurrences except through physical signs that are peculiarly liable to misinterpreta- tion. The result is that our conclusions on the localization of cere- bral function must be reached by considering a great multitude of complicated facts, many of which appear to take sides with contend- 1 Archiv. f. Anat., Physiol., etc., 1870, p. 332. 'See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 189. STIMULATION AND EXTIRPATION. 255 ing champions of different theories who alike appeal to them. It is only by observing the directions in which the different lines of evidence seem to point in common, that we can reach even a prob- able opinion upon a few points. 14. Three great lines of evidence, leading from three great groups of facts, must be considered. These are the evidence from experimentation, the evidence from pathology, and the evidence from histology and comparative anatomy. Each of the three has its peculiar advantages and value ; each also its peculiar difficulties and dangers. It is only by regarding the combined testimony of the three that the highest probability at present possible can be at- tained. Experimentation with a view to discover the localized functions of the cerebral cortex is of two kinds, stimulation and extirpation. Here, too, what has already been said (Parti., chap. IV., 14) con- cerning the difficulties of the same mode of investigation in the sub-cerebral regions of the encephalon must be recalled and made more emphatic. All experiment by stimulation of certain areas of the hemispheres of the brain relies, of course, upon the argument that those areas whose stimulation is followed by the movement of definite groups of muscles are especially connected with such groups of muscles. The further assumption is likely to be made that these areas constitute the special organs which have control, as it were, of the same muscles. Since it seems to be a general principle that the sensory and motor nerve-tracts distributed to any region of the periphery come into tolerably close local relations to each other somewhere within the entire field of the cerebrum, it would seem to follow that some special connection exists between certain classes of sensations and volitions and the circumscribed areas of cortical substance pointed out by experiment. It should not be forgotten, however, that the excitation of any group of muscles, by applying stimulus to some area of the cerebral cortex, proves only that this area is somehow connected with such group of muscles. It still remains to be shown that sensory impulses, on arriving from such a peripheral portion of the body, serve as the physical basis for the psychical phenomena of sensation solely within this circumscribed central area ; or that conscious volitions, in order to be followed by motion in this peripheral portion, must give rise to the mole- cular commotion of the same area. 15. By far the most efficient and manageable stimulus for ex- perimenting upon the localization of cerebral function is the electrical current. Mechanical or chemical irritation may, however, be em- ployed in certain cases. The use of the electrical current incurs, 256 EVIDENCE FOR LOCALIZATION. of course, the danger of its diffusion. Important objections, based upon this fact and upon other grounds connected with the use of electricity, have been raised to the conclusions of Hitzig. 1 To Hitzig's claim that the electrical currents which excite the so-called motor areas are "very weak," and therefore unable, at a very slight distance from the place of the application of the electrodes, to affect the ne*rvous substance, Hermann replies that, on the contrary, con- sidering the effect antecedently to be expected, these currents are " surprisingly strong," and that the brain, in diffusing the currents, must act like any other substance (e.g., a mass of copper) of similar form that is to say, the distribution of such a current in the sub- stance of the brain is a purely geometrical function of the form of this substance and of the position of the electrodes. Moreover, it is found that increasing the strength of the current applied to a so-called "motor area " invariably increases the size of the cortical region thrown into activity. That extra-polar conduction actually takes place in the substance of the brain has been shown by Dupuy, and by Carville and Duret ; contraction of the muscle of the rheo- scopic frog and deflection of the needle of the galvanometer, at re- mote distances from the electrodes, prove that the current passes along the whole extent of the cerebral hemisphere. The excitability of the cortical substance continues for hours after its exposure to the air, or after acids have completely destroyed its external third por- tion. If the cortical area be separated by a circular cut from all connection with the nervous substance below, it is still excitable with only a slight increase in the strength of the stimulus applied. Or if the gray substance of the surface be wholly removed, and the electrodes plunged in the blood of the cavity of one of these so- called motor areas, the customary results follow. Still further, the size of the circle within which the minimum amount of stimulus, when applied to certain gyri, will serve to excite the hind-limb of the animal, remains about the same whether the amount of cortical surface contained in the circle be largely increased by a sulcus crossing it, or not. From facts like the foregoing it is argued that, while beyond question the application of a given amount of stimulus to certain gyri of the cortical surface will produce definite motor results, we cannot affirm those gyri to be the true cortical centres of such motion. Such gyri have accordingly been regarded by some as merely connected with the excitation of motion in a mechanical 1 See especially the article of Hermann describing investigations under- taken by him in company with von Borosnyai, Luchsiuger, and others, Pfliiger's Archiv (1875), x., pp. 77 ff, EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION. 257 way, through their service in conducting the electrical stimulus to other regions of the brain, especially to the basal ganglia. The argument for the theory of localization would need to show, how- ever, that the electrical current stimulates these areas immediately to the exercise of their central nervous functions, and does not simply pass through them to excite other nervous matter lying beneath. To the foregoing objections the advocates of the theory of locali- zation make the following among other replies : " The effect of irri- tation of the basal ganglia is capable of exact estimation ; " l and definite localized contraction of single groups of muscles, such as comes from stimulating certain areas of the cortical surface, does not follow from irritating the basal ganglia. Stimulation of other areas of the cortical surface which lie nearer to the basal ganglia for example, of the island of Keil, which immediately overlies the corpus striatum causes no movements. On the contrary, it was found by Carville and Duret that the phenomena evoked by stimu- lating the motor areas persist, even after the destruction of the corpus striatum. Moreover, when the animal is deeply etherized, the excitability of the cortical regions is partially or wholly lost. 2 Since the physical conductivity of the gray nervous substance is not impaired by the anaesthesia, the loss of function must be due to the functional condition of this substance. More conclusive do the facts appear to be, which show that the nature of the motor reaction following upon the application of stimulus to the cortical substance is peculiar. Many observers have found that a stronger stimulation is necessary to bring about the same motor results after the cortical surface is removed ; this is what we should expect on the theory of localization, but the reverse of what would be true if the effect of the current was transmitted unchanged through this surface. Then, too, Franck and Pitres 3 have shown that the effect of the electrical current is retarded in the gray matter ; the difference of time, as dependent upon whether the stimulus is applied to the gray matter or to the white lying beneath, being about 0.015 second. This interval must be spent in evolving, under the influence of the stimulus, the distinct neural function which belongs to the gray matter. Finally, the excitation is appar- ently reinforced in strength by the functional activity of the cor- tical substance, since as we have just seen a stronger stimulation is needed to produce the same result after this substance is re- 1 Ferrier, The Functions of the Brain, London, 1876, p. 133 f. 2 See Hitzig in Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc., 1873, p. 402. 3 Archives de physiologic, 1875. 17 258 EVIDENCE FOR LOCALIZATION. moved ; such reinforcement is the peculiar property of the central organs. It seems obvious, therefore, that experiments with electrical stimulation of the cortical surface demonstrate a special connection between certain more or less definitely circumscribed areas of that surface and definite groups of muscles ; they also create a strong presumption that this connection is not merely anatomical or structural, but also functional. 16. The second kind of direct experimental evidence is de- rived from observing the effects of extirpation. It is natural to argue that those areas of the brain, the loss of which is followed by the loss or disturbance of motion in definite groups of muscles, or by the loss or disturbance of any class of sensory impressions, are functionally related in a peculiar way to such muscles or organs of sense. But the application of this argument is encompassed with many difficulties. In the first place, it is impossible at each stage of the experiment which often includes several days or months of observation to know precisely what the condition of the brain is. Post-mortem examination of the brain reveals only what was the final effect of the experiment in destroying its tissues. The rise and fall of local or extensive inflammations, the progress of degeneration in the nerve- tracts and of abscesses result- ing from the primary lesions, etc., cannot be followed by the ex- perimenter in detail. Nor can he directly observe the formation and education of the tissue as it is called upon for an increase in the amount of its former functions, or perhaps for the discharge of functions partially new. As a rule, then, it is found that the effects of extirpation change from time to time ; some of them are of first importance and cannot well be overlooked, and others are so delicate and minute as almost wholly to escape observation ; some speedily pass away, others more slowly, still others perhaps not at all. Tha difficulties are, of course, especially great when we try to deal with effects upon the animal's sensory apparatus and his psychical world of sensations and perceptions. To tell whether an animal sees, hears, feels, smells, and tastes, or not ; and to tell precisely in what sense it exercises these functions whether, for example, its deficiency is " soul-blindness " in any of its various degrees are not tasks which it is easy to perform, or about the correct performance of which one can indulge in a boundless confidence. The demonstrative value of both kinds of experimental evidence electrization and extirpation is much lessened by the fact that it is almost wholly derived from the lower animals. Ethical con- FACTS OF HUMAN PATHOLOGY. 259 siderations, which few investigators dare even occasionally to dis- regard, forbid that the living human brain should be made the subject of similar experiment. In order, then, to draw any safe conclusions from this evidence, it is necessary not only that the application of the principle of localization in general should be as- sumed, but also that some right should be gained to transfer to the human brain from the map of the cortical surface of the ani- mal's brain, the so-called motor and sensory areas which have been determined by experiment. But it is not even in all cases clear, precisely what convolutions or parts of convolutions of the human cerebrum correspond to those previously marked out on the brain of the animal. Moreover, in the effort to make any such transfer- ence of the argument from the animals to man, we meet again with the insuperable difficulty of forming a correct mental picture of the psychical life of the animals. 17. The evidence from human pathology for the localization of cerebral function has a peculiar value ; but it has also its peculiar puzzles and dangers. Such evidence is free, indeed, from the ob- jections which arise against all attempts to carry the argument over from the cerebral hemispheres of the lower animals directly to those of man. Nature and human intercourse are less kind to this wonderful mass of nerve-cells and nerve-fibres than the electrodes and knife of the physiologist are compelled to be. Accident and disease destroy, either suddenly or progressively, the different areas of the cortical substance of the human brain. They have, in various cases, made such a variety of attacks upon it as to cover all the areas of both hemispheres. If, then, we had a large collection of cases in which the lesions were definitely circumscribed, or the progress made by the destruction of tissue was accurately recorded for every stage ; and if we had also a correspondingly definite and accurate description of the motor and sensory disturbances occa- sioned by these lesions, we might perhaps be able to make a toler- ably conclusive induction. But losses of brain-tissue, when caused by accident and disease, have not the same circumscribed limits which can be observed by the knife or corroding acid of the physi- ologist. Lesions of the cortical areas entirely free from complica- tion with lesions in the sensory and motor tracts below are compar- atively infrequent. Cases of total destruction of any so-called "area " on both hemispheres, and of such area alone, rarely or never occur. Furthermore, it is only by careful post-mortem examination that the precise extent of the pathological changes can be known ; this examination, at best, reveals simply the last state of the case. The reports of post-mortem examinations are also, as a rule, lacking 260 EVIDENCE FOR LOCALIZATION. in precision. On the other hand, the symptoms of motor or sensory disturbance are rarely described, from beginning to end, with suffi- cient accuracy of detail to be of great service. Many large losses of cerebral substance are followed by no sensory or motor disturb- ances which can be distinctly traced. In large numbers of cases where such disturbances arise, they in time pass almost or quite wholly away. For these and other reasons the best evidence at- tainable from pathological cases, when collected and sifted, appears surprisingly confusing and self-contradictory. Pathology has, there- fore, furnished the common fund of cases from which the most di- verse and even contradictory theories have drawn at sight their stock of so-called proof. It has been used as the careless and false witness upon which either party, and all parties to the suit, could call for precisely the testimony desired. An increase of information and care on the part of those who have opportunity for ante- and post- mortem observation of such cases will doubtless, in time, cause pathology to yield much more assured results. 18. The third kind of evidence to which the principle of the localization of cerebral function may appeal comes from compara- tive anatomy and histology. Comparative anatomy, however, gives us evidence of only the most general kind. Combined with exper- iment by electrical excitation, it shows that, on the whole, the higher the structure and intelligence of the animal, the more nu- merous and more definitely marked are the " excito-motor areas " which may be discovered on the hemispheres of its brain. Only traces, as it were, of such areas can be found upon the cerebral hemispheres of the frog or the pigeon ; only a few areas can be doubtfully pointed out for the rat or guinea-pig. The indications are clearer and more numerous of localized cerebral function in definite centres of the brains of the rabbit and the sheep. But it is in dealing with the cerebral convolutions of the more highly specialized brains of the dog, and particularly of the monkey or the man-like ape, that the proofs of the theory become most abundant. While, then, the argument from all the other animals to man is' uncertain and should be used only with great caution, the general drift of comparative anatomy encourages us to place the greater confidence in it, the more nearly the brain of the particular animal from whose case we wish to draw the inference resembles the brain of man. At the same time, the rash confidence with which the brain of the monkey has been mapped out in detail, and human pathology thereupon ransacked with the purpose of finding some warrant for copying this map upon the brain of the human species, cannot be too carefully avoided. THE EVIDENCE OF HISTOL Histology supplements and confirms the other evidence by show- ing that the structure and connections of different parts of the cerebrum are such as we should expect them to be, in case the functions of the parts were such as experimentation and pathology seem to have discovered. The modern arts of microscopy and photography have made possible an increasingly accurate knowledge of the intimate structure of the brain. Many great difficulties, however, still remain in the way of such perfection of this knowl- edge as will make it available as a secure foundation for a theory of the localization of cerebral function. At present the histology of the human cerebral hemispheres is not in a condition to take the place of a leader of physiological experiment and pathological observations. Its office is still rather that of rendering supple- mentary evidence in correction or confirmation of the evidence from the other two sources. Thus, for example, if Gliky's belief that he traced the nerve-tracts from the so-called motor centres of the cerebral hemispheres as they bend around the striate bodies and run into the crusta of the crura cerebri should be demon- strated, this fact would constitute an item of confirmatory evidence furnished by histology to experimental physiology and pathology, in favor of their general theory. 19. According to the foregoing view of the nature of the three kinds of evidence available, it would seem that, in collating and estimating the combined proofs from them all^the following course of inquiry should be pursued. The indications of experiment upon the cerebral hemispheres of the animals especially of those most closely allied to man in their cerebral structure by the two methods of stimulation and extirpation, must first be gathered and carefully weighed. Only those conclusions upon which the two methods are found to yield substantially the same results should be selected for further testing. The instances of localization of cere- bral function thus detected in the other higher mammals must then be allowed to suggest to pathology the questions it should undertake to answer with reference to man. In other words, ex- perimentation with the other animals suggests and strengthens the hypothesis which human pathology must try to satisfy. But in undertaking to test such hypothesis, pathology must be both fair and comprehensive in its observations. All the accessible patho- logical cases must be sifted and those only selected to bring for- ward as evidence which have the definite nature, and have received the careful examination recorded in detail, that are necessary to make them of real value. The corrective or confirmatory evidence of histology must then, so far as possible, be summoned to aid in 262 EVIDENCE FOE LOCALIZATION. forming our final conclusions. It is not until all the kinds of proof unite with a large and substantial agreement, if not with an abso- lute uniformity, that we can feel the utmost confidence attainable in our results. If it be found that certain regions of the cerebral hemispheres of the higher animals are the only ones to respond when stimulated with movements in definite peripheral parts of the body, and that the injury of those same central regions alone, or chiefly, causes motor and sensory disturbances in the same periph- eral parts ; if it also be found that lesions of the corresponding regions of the human brain are alone, or chiefly, followed by similar motor and sensory disturbances, and that lesions of other regions alone are rarely or never followed by these same disturbances ; and, finally, if it be found that these same cortical regions have in the human body a special anatomical connection with these same pe- ripheral parts ; then we have reached the most conclusive evidence attainable for a theory that the cerebral functions are localized in the case of man. But precisely what is meant by such " localiza- tion " may still remain more or less a matter of dispute. We con- sider now a summary of the evidence according to the foregoing principles. CHAPTEK II. THE LOCALIZATION OF CEBEBKAL FUNCTION. [CONTINUED.] 1. ON attempting to make an induction from all the three kinds of evidence which may be adduced in answer to the question, whether the different functions of the cerebral cortex have special relations to its different localities, no other difficulties are on the whole so great as those which come from so-called "negative cases." These negative cases force the inquirer to undertake a detailed ex- perimental and pathological examination. " That the cortex of the cerebrum, the undoubted material substratum of our mental opera- tions," says Ecker, 1 "is not a single organ, which is brought into play as a whole in the exercise of each and every psychical function, " but consists rather of a multitude of mental organs, each of which is subservient to certain intellectual processes, is a conviction which forces itself upon us almost with the necessity of a claim of reason." But even the proposition that the brain is the "material substratum of our mental operations," is very far indeed from having the char- acter of a rational necessity. The further proposition that the cor- tex of the cerebrum " consists of a multitude of mental organs," is an inadequate statement of a conclusion which, at the very best, we can adopt only as the result of a long series of complex and con- flicting researches. In fact, considerable areas of the cortical sur- face appear, at first, not to have any immediate relation to any psy- chical function whatever. The first general principle to be admitted in all attempts at a theory of the localization of cerebral function is, then, of a nega- tive character. This principle is based upon the negative results of physiological inquiry. Considerable areas of the cortical sur- face do not respond with motor activities when stimulated. Con- siderable portions of the cortical substance may be extirpated or lost by disease without the destruction or appreciable disturbance of any motor, sensory, or more purely intellectual functions. To such an astonishing extent is this true as to throw temporary doubt not only over the whole theory of the localization of cerebral func- 1 The Convolutions of the Human Brain, p. 1. London, 1873. 264 STIMULATION AND EXTIRPATION. tion, but even over the statement that the cerebral cortex, as a -whole, is the only " material substratum " of mental operations. 2. Attention has already been called (Chap. I., 11) to the fact that Longet, Flourens, and other great physiologists, considered the cerebral hemispheres to be active as a whole in all their func- tions, and this, partly, because they found them not irritable by the electrical current. The discovery of Fritsch and Hitzig in 1870 de- monstrated that a part of the hemispheres of the dog, and a part only, gives signs of being excited by the application of stimulus. This part they called " motor," and located, in general, in the fore part of the hemispheres ; behind lay the region called " non-mo- tor," because it gave no response on being stimulated. 1 Even with- in this so-called " motor " region the early researches of these in- vestigators pointed out only five spots of a small fraction of an inch in diameter (the electrodes were, as a rule, separated not more than 2-3 mm.) that could be more definitely related to the movement of certain groups of muscles ; between and around these spots lay the much larger areas of negative result. Subsequent experiments added a few more such irritable areas to the map of the cerebral hemispheres of the dog. A large number of so-called centres, cover- ing an increased amount of the cortical surface, have been pointed out by Ferrier and others on the cerebral hemispheres of the mon- key. Fully half of this number, however, cannot be regarded as having anything like a demonstrable character ; and much fault has justly been found 2 with many operators upon the brains both of monkeys and of dogs, for their lack of precision in experiment, and haste in drawing conclusions. Experiments in extirpation also show that considerable areas of the cortical substance may be removed without perceptibly im- pairing any of the motor or sensory functions of the animal. In- deed, even when the loss of the cortical substance, thus artificially produced, extends over almost an entire hemisphere, or over a large portion of both hemispheres, the operation may not result (in the case of the dog, ordinarily does not result), in the permanent and complete loss of any specific function, motor or sensory. So true is this that one eminent observer, Goltz, has maintained, on the basis 1 Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc., 1870, p. 311. * See, for example, Munk's strictures of Ferrier, Ueber d. Functionen d. Grosshirnrinde, Berlin, 1881, pp. 14 ff. (also p. 6 f. ; 36 f. " roh war operirt, roll beobachtet, roh gescMossen"). On the other hand, the charge of careless- ness in experiment, and of illogical conclusions, is freely made against Munk himself, both by advocates of rival theories of localization, like Dr. Yeo and others, and also by opponents of all theories of localization, like Goltz, Lob, and others. EVIDENCE FROM NEGATIVE CASES. 265 of many experiments in extirpation, that it is chiefly the quantity of the cerebral substance destroyed, in large measure irrespective of the locality, which determines the nature and extent of the result- ing psychical disturbances. The arguments of Goltz (as he him- self admits) do not answer those urged for a certain kind and de- gree of the localization of cerebral function. Bat his experiments furnish a large number of facts which emphasize the negative char- acter of many of the results of experiment. This fact is in itself undeniably unfavorable to any theory which would map out the en- tire cortical surface into so-called centres or areas, to be considered as separate organs of particular psychical processes. 3. The negative evidence from certain cases in human pa- thology is yet more astonishing and perplexing. At first sight it seems to suggest the conclusion that the mind can dispense, with- out impairment, with a considerable mass of brain-substance, no matter from what region it be subtracted. Many cases of large le- sions of the cerebral hemispheres in man, with no resulting disturb- ance of the psychical functions, are recorded. 1 Berenger de Carpi tells of a young man who had a foreign body of four fingers' breadth square driven into the substance of his brain until it was buried. Much of this substance was lost when the foreign body was removed, and more yet some thirteen days later. Nevertheless, the patient lived for a long time in the enjoy- ment of all his faculties. Longet was acquainted with an army officer who had lost, by a wound in the parietal region, a large quantity of brain-substance ; yet he remained mentally vivacious and showed no other result of the lesion than a tendency to grow tired easily. The same authority communicates 2 the case of an Italian whose skull was crushed in the right parietal region by a stone. So much of the substance of the brain w r as lost on the wound being dressed, and subsequently through a fall from his bed (on the eighteenth day) and through intoxication (on the thirty-fifth day), that the attendant physician calculated the lesion must have reached down nearly to the corpus callosum. The man, however, lived without any apparent impair- ment of psychical functions ; but we note in this case a permanent laming of the limbs of the left side. 1 See the list of such cases in Ferrier, the Localization of Cerebral Disease, London, 1878, pp. 25 ff.; Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., pp. 333 ff.; Brucke, Vorlesungen iiber Physiol., II., p. 57 f. Wien, 1884; and the works cited by the two former, especially Pitres, Lesions du centre ovale Paris 1877. 2 Recorded, however, by Quesnay. 266 STIMULATION AND EXTIRPATION. A remarkable case is narrated by Briicke, 1 on the authority of a certain Dr. Kratter. By a blow from a stone on the parietal region of the skull, one Ivan Mussulin was thrown to the ground ; but within two hours he recovered so that he himself went to the " praetor " and entered complaint against his assailant. For twenty days he lived in apparently full possession of his powers of motion, sensation, and intelligence ; on the twenty-first day he suddenly died. The entire left cerebral hemisphere was found on examination to be a disorganized mass. It is to be noticed, how- ever, that the autopsy did not take place until some eighteen hours after death, and that we have no good means of judging what the condition of the injured hemisphere was during the twenty days preceding his sudden death. Eemarkable instances of defective brains are also on record ; for example, the case which Lallemand narrates of a person of normal psychical constitution in whose cerebrum the entire place of the right hemisphere was, after death, unexpectedly found to have been filled with a serous fluid. Here again, however, there had been lameness of the left side of the body from birth. Extensive lesions without marked motor or sensory disturbances occur by far most frequently in the frontal lobes of the cerebral hemispheres. Yet similar negative cases are by no means infre- quent also in the occipital and temporo-sphenoidal lobes. Trous- seau narrates the case of an officer who was shot through the head in the middle of the frontal lobes, and who showed until death, which occurred from inflammation, no signs of any kind of paral- ysis. The work of M. Pitres 3 contains a large collection of cases, in which the frontal lobes have been the seat of extensive disease, of softening, or of abscess, without any symptoms of laming what- ever ; in most of which, also, no disturbance of psychical con- dition was observed. That sudden extensive lesions may occur in this region without inducing sensory or motor paralysis, is shown in a marked way by the celebrated "American crowbar case." 3 By premature discharge of blasting powder an iron bar, three feet seven inches in length and one and one-fourth inch in diameter, was driven through the brain of a young man. The missile en- tered at the left angle of the jaw, and passed through the top of the head near the sagittal suture in the frontal region ; it was picked up at some distance off, covered with blood and brains. The pa- 1 Vorlesungen iiber Physiol., II., p. 57. 2 Lesions du centre ovale. a See the paper in the Am. Journal for Med. Sciences, by Dr. Bigelow, July, 1850, and the one read before the Mass. Med. So. by Dr. Harlow, June, 1868, GENEEAL MOTOR EEGION. 267 tient, although for the moment stunned, recovered in a few min- utes so as to ascend a flight of stairs and give to the surgeon an intelligible account of his injury. He lived twelve and a half years afterward, with no noticeable impairment of his sensory-motor powers. Examination of the skull showed that the substance de- stroyed by the bar must have been confined to the frontal region, with the possible exception of the tip of the temporo-sphenoidal lobe. Boyer narrates the case of an epileptic child, that showed, how- ever, no other abnormal nervous phenomena, whose entire temporal lobe on the left side was found to have been destroyed. Instances of extensive lesions in the occipital lobes, without any resulting sensory or motor disturbances, might also be given. 4. It must be confessed, in the words of Exner, 1 that the understanding of cases of this sort " is made more difficult rather than easier by recent researches." Nevertheless, a large amount of concurrent testimony from all three main sources of evidence proves that some theory may be framed in acknowledgment of a more definite localization of cerebral function. Such theory can be most clearly established with respect to the cerebral region especially concerned in the motor functions. This region is the one l^ing about the great central fissure, or fissure of Kolando ; more precisely still, it embraces the gyrus centralis anterior, the gyrus centralis posterior, and the prolongation of the two on the median surface of the brain in the lobulus paracentralis. (Comp. Figs. 87 and 88). More definite localizations still, of smaller re- gions within the larger one e. g., for the upper limbs, for the lower limbs, for the separate fingers, etc. are more doubtful ; they can by no means appeal to the same amount of evidence as that at com- mand of the more general induction. 5. The evidence from experiments in stimulation indicates that we are to look for the so-called "motor areas" in the above-mentioned convolutions about the fissure of Kolando. The original experi- ments of Fritsch and Hitzig 2 located the five motor areas as fol- lows : The centre for the muscles of the neck (marked A in the figure) in the middle of the prse-frontal gyrus at the spot where its surface falls off steep ; the centre for the extensor and adductor of the fore-limb, at the outermost end of the post-frontal gyrus in the region near the end of the frontal fissure (-f- in the figure) ; the 1 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 334. 3 See Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc., 1870, p. 312 f.; comp. Taf. IX B. by Hitzig in the same Archiv for 1873, from which the accompanying figure is taken. 268 STIMULATION AND EXTIKPATION. FIG. 83. Hitzig's Motor Areas on the Cortex of the Dog. The left hemisphere belongs to one animal, the right to another; a, the sulcus cruciatus, around which the gyrus Bigmoideus bends ; oooo, area for the face. The other symbols are explained in the text. centre for the bending and rotation of the same limb, a little farther back (+ in the figure) ; the centre for the hind-limb, in the post-frontal gyrus but to- ward the median line of the hemisphere and back of the preceding two centres (4j= in F the figure) ; the facial centre, * in the middle part of the Q gyrus lying above the fissure of Sylvius ($- O in the figure). These experimenters found 4- also that the muscles of the o back, tail, and abdomen, were excited to contraction by stimulating points lying be- * tween those marked as above ; but they could not definitely circumscribe the cortical areas w |>:ph wprp tn hp fl<*qif sensations arise through the skin is shown 304 THE KINDS OF SENSATION. by the popular use of the word to "feel." Things fed hard and soft, smooth and rough, as well as warm and cold. But things are also said to feel heavy or light. The feeling by which their weight is estimated, however, is only ascribed in a very indefinite way to the parts of the body that are chiefly concerned in passively sup- porting, or actively lifting, or pushing against their weight. The particular use of tactual feeling, as well as the general use of the muscular sense, in gaining this class of sensations is little noticed by ordinary reflection. 2. All the sensations are also regarded as having some place in a scale of degrees of sensation ; they are either strong or faint, or else lie somewhere between the two extremes. They are also habitually thought of as related in time, and as being connected with the motion in space of the objects that occasion them. Of the molecular action of their stimuli upon the end-organs of special sense ; of the hidden chemical, electrical, or other processes con- nected with the activity of the peripheral and central nervous sys- tem ; of the physiological, psycho-physical, and psychological laws under which the mind reacts in the form of simple sensations, and combines these sensations into the composite objects of sense ; of all these and other similar matters, the unreflecting conception of sensation takes no account. 3. It is obvious that the analysis of sense-percepts which suf- fices for working-day life will in no respect answer the demands of science. Its " common-sense " character is a distinct mark of its inadequacy. An adequate scientific treatment of this branch of Physiological Psychology requires at least four things : (1) to dis- tinguish the simple sensations from those complex objects of experi- ence with which alone our adult consciousness is familiar ; (2) to point out the varieties of quality and degrees of quantity which be- long to these sensations, and to discover the laws which relate them to changes in the form and intensity of their stimuli ; (3) to show how the simple sensations are constructed by the mind into the so- called "presentations of sense" under mental laws of time-form and space-form ; and (4) to indicate how far, if at all, the higher mental activities of association, memory, will, and judgment, may be brought under laws similar to those upon which the formation of these presentations of sense depends. It is upon these four heads of inquiry that modern psychology, as studied from the psycho-physical point of view, has expended most of its painstak- ing researches. Its success has been by no means complete. All these fields of inquiry still include many unanswered questions ; all of them present the results of researches that seem in various re- THE ANALYSIS OF SENSATIONS. 305 spects conflicting. Yet it is precisely in these fields that modern psychology has achieved its most brilliant successes. It has thrown a flood of new light upon the essential nature and growth of hu- man experience. It has profoundly influenced the current views on metaphysics. It has contributed important factors toward the solution of certain questions of interest to ethics and religion. It has given us a new point of view for renewing the ancient debate between Materialism and Spiritualism. 4. The distinctions with which scientific analysis begins are to a large extent received from ordinary experience. Some of the most essential of the distinctions are confirmed by the results of this analysis. They all, however, require to be carried farther and to be fixed with much more of accuracy than belongs to the im- pressions of common life. New distinctions also have to be intro- duced. For example, scientific investigation maintains the differ- ence between sensations of smell and sensations of taste ; but it points out what is not ordinarily apparent namely, that certain results commonly referred to the latter sense really belong to the former. It also adds the sensations of the muscular sense to the classes popularly described ; and it discriminates more clearly be- tween two distinct kinds of sensation that have the skin for their organ namely, temperature and pressure. Psycho-physical science, moreover, accepts the common distinc- tion between the quality and the quantity of the different sensa- tions. But it describes with all possible accuracy the limits within which alone this distinction can be carried out. It shows that the quality and quantity of sensation are inseparably connected ; that, as Lotze held (a view confirmed by von Kries and others), changes in quality can be distinguished from changes in intensity, with perfect confidence, only in the case of sensations of hearing. It is possible that even here the distinction is largely made on the basis of complex experience. Very intense sensations of heat and cold so far change their specific character as to tend to pass into each other, or, perhaps, to become submerged in a common tone of painful feeling. Minimum sensations of heat and pressure are difficult to distinguish from each other ; maximum sensations of pressure are likely to lose the characteristic quality of touch and be displaced by sensations of pain. To treat scientifically of the quality of sensations requires, then, a large amount of the most careful analysis. 5. It is essential, in the first place, to distinguish " simple sensations" from " presentations of sense," or those complex ob- jects of consciousness which result from an act of mental synthesis 20 306 THE KINDS OF SENSATION. on the basis of several simultaneous affections of sense. As respects developed experience, the simple sensation is a necessary fiction of psycho-physical science. Consciousness is scarcely more able di- rectly to analyze a presentation of sense into those factors out of which it originated than it is to analyze a drop of water into its component oxygen and hydrogen gases. Simple sensations, there- fore, are not objects which can be examined in the direct light of introspection. Yet they are factors w r hich, as scientific analysis shows, actually enter into all such objects as can properly be spoken of under the term " presentations of sense." Any sensation which is absolutely unanalyzable with respect to distinctions of quality, and which, therefore, cannot be considered as consisting of com- ponent parts, is called simple. It is distinguished as a sensation from all other elementary forms of feeling or knowledge, by the relation which it sustains to the presentations of sense. A sensa- tion, unlike the feeling of grief, of desire, or of weariness, etc., is a potential factor of a material object. Through the senses we know " things ; " not, indeed, as though they appeared before the mind by immediate apprehension in the form of exact copies of extra- mental realities. But every sensation is an affection of the mind recognized as connected with an extra-mental reality, through the activity of the senses. Simple sensations are those elementary factors, themselves indecomposable, out of which the presentations of sense are composed. The objects of sense, however, do not have the character of mere compounds of simple sensations. Sensations must not only be associated and compounded, but also localized and projected without (that is, set in systematic relations of space- form), in order to constitute the objects of sense. 6. The foregoing remarks suffice to indicate, in a preliminary way, what is the nature and value of the psycho-physical investi- gation of sensation. We inquire, in the next two chapters, as to the Quality of Sensations. The inquiry, when conducted from the psycho-physical point of view, involves an answer to three questions : (1) What is the precise locality in the organism where the specific excitation which occasions each kind of sensation originates ; and what is the nature of the action of the stimulus in producing such excitation? (2) What are the kinds of sensations which appear in consciousness as the result of the various excitations ? (3) What are the laws by which the quality of the sensations is related to the kinds of excitation? Neither of these three questions can be answered completely. The investigation of the first is much re- stricted by our almost complete ignorance of those processes in the central organs that are in all cases the proximate internal SPECIFIC ENERGY OF NERVES. 307 stimuli or immediate antecedents of the sensations. Moreover, our knowledge of the intimate structure of the end-organs of sense, and of the nature of the physical processes which excite them, is still very incomplete. The detection of obscure but important dif- ferences in the qualities of conscious states of sensation is by no means easy ; it requires great skill, strict and trained attention, and unwearied repetition of experiment. But these conditions of success have a great effect in altering the quality of the sensations themselves. Besides all this, remarkable idiosyncrasies not infre- quently appear ; and language can only imperfectly describe even the most common factors of the varied and living experiences with which science tries to deal. In investigating the laws that define the relations between our subjective experience, called sensation, and objective phenomena in the shape of physical energy acting upon the nervous mechanism, there is often the greatest doubt as to what manner of laws are be- ing investigated. They may be considered as purely physiological, or as psycho-physical, or as purely psychological. It is not strange, therefore, that different theories exist for accounting for all the more important groups of facts, depending upon the emphasis laid by different investigators upon the value of each of the three possi- ble modes of explanation. The truth is, that each sensation is sepa- rated by a series of intricate physiological and psychical processes from the application of the stimulus in the gross, as it were, to the end-organ of sense. 7. The authority of one great law is involved, as a silent assumption, in all discussion of the quality of sensations. This law is known as the law of the Specific Energy of the Nerves. It has already been shown (Part I., chap. I., 35) that any such dis- tinction of the kinds of nerve-fibres as denies their possession of common functions cannot be maintained. But the phenomena of sensation cannot be explained without a much more extended application of this law than has thus far been found necessary. Distinctions of quality in sensation depend upon the excitation of specific corresponding elements of the nervous system. That only the optic nerve is capable, when excited, of exercising the physio- logical function upon which sensations of light and color depend, does not admit of doubt ; the same specific quality cannot be denied to the functional activity of the nerves of smell, taste, hear- ing, and touch. Moreover, in the end-organs of each of these senses, provision must be made for a further differentiation of function. What is the nature of the evidence, and what conclu- sions must be drawn from it, will be best appreciated at a later pe- 308 SENSATIONS OF SMELL AND TASTE. riod in the discussion. Meantime we find ourselves obliged to as- sume the existence of some law of the specific energ} r of the nerves of special sense. 8. Little of a scientific character is known concerning Sensa- tions of Smell, considered as respects their quality. Anatomy, chemistry, and physics fail to furnish definite information on this point ; experimental physiology as applied to the lower animals is, of course, unsatisfactory ; and the appeal to human consciousness asks for an analysis of which it is incapable. It has already been shown (Part L, Chap. V.) that the part of the mucous membrane of the nasal passages known as regio olfactoria contains the end- organs of smell ; the specific stimulus of the organs in this region is applied as borne thither by the current of air, and almost, if not quite, exclusively in the act of inspiration. In order that any sub- stance may act through the end-organs on the nerve (olfactorius) which is spread out in this region, it must either exist in gaseous form or else be vaporizable under given conditions of temperature. The degree of temperature at which different substances become odorous therefore varies according to their physical characteristics. For example, arsenic, which at ordinary temperatures is inodorous, when raised to a dark-red heat is vaporized and the vapor excites an intense sensation of smell. Fluid bodies which give off an odorous reek, when brought in fluid form into contact with the mucous membrane of the regio olfactoria have no smell ; if this membrane is soaked in fluid of any kind whatever, it loses for a time the capacity to be excited with olfactory impressions. E. H. Weber ' discovered that if the head be placed with the nostrils pointing upward, and the nasal passages be then filled with pure water, sweetened water, or a mixture of water and eau de Cologne, after these passages are emptied the sense of smell is, in all cases, temporarily lost ; even when Cologne is used, with the exception of the instant at which the fluid is poured in, no odor can be per- ceived. Subsequent observers have confirmed the experiments of Weber. One investigator 2 lost all sense of smell, even for acetic acid and ammonia, for a period of half a minute ; another for five minutes, and the sense in its full acuteness did not return for nearly half an hour. Whether this effect of the fluid is due to impair- ment of the end-apparatus of smell by soaking it (so Valentin), or to the mechanical barrier which the layer of foreign substances interposes between the odorous particles and this apparatus (so Frohlich), we cannot say ; it may be due to both causes. Contrary 1 See Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc., 1847, p. 257. Frohlich, in Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., 1851, VI, p. 322. THE STIMULUS OF SMELL. 309 to the assertion of Wundt, 1 that probably no gases or vapors, except atmospheric air and its constituents, are absolutely inodorous, so far as we have present information a number of gaseous and va- porizable substances are so ; and no reason is known for such apparent exceptions to the rule. 9. The stimulus of smell is supposed to consist in certain ex- ceedingly minute particles contained in the odorous gas or vapor which is drawn in with the current of air over the mucous mem- brane of the regio olfactoria. The question is as yet scarcely de- cided, whether other forms of stimulus, besides these odorous particles mechanical, electrical, thermic, or so-called subjective can excite the sensation of smell. The older experimenters (Volta, Pfaff, Fowler, and Humboldt) failed to obtain any certain proof that the electrical current is an excitant of this sense. In one place, however, Pfaff speaks of a sensation resembling the smell of sul- phur as caused by the application of electricity to the sensory pas- sages of the nose. Hitter (in 1798) experimented by using bits of graphite and zinc thrust into these passages, and also by holding one pole of a battery in the hand and placing the other in the nos- tril. In the latter way he thought that he excited a genuine spe- cific sensation of this sense. He describes the positive pole in the nostril as producing an inclination to sneeze and a trace of a smell like that of "ammonia ; " the negative pole placed there does away with this inclination and produces a kind of " sour " smell. Such phenomena are probably, however, all to be assigned to the nerves of taste, touch, and common feeling. More recent investigations have done little to remove the reasons for doubt. 2 The smell of phosphorus which is developed by the action of the electrical ma- chine is probably due to the ozone set free ; it is not a case, then, of the direct excitation by electricity of the sensation of smell. Some physiologists (notably Valentin) have observed that this sen- sation may be awakened by mechanical stimulation, such as strong vibration of the nostrils, violent sneezing, etc.; others have failed to produce this specific sensory effect in such ways. It does not appear that thermic stimulation will excite the sensation of smell. Experiments to prove that subjective sensations of smell may be produced by injecting odorous substances into the veins of animals are very uncertain. Human pathological cases, in spite of the cus- tomary indefiniteness of the patient's testimony as to the nature of his sensory affection, show that compression of the olfactory nerve 1 Grundziige d. physiolog. Psychologie, i. , 384 ; comp. von Vintschgau, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 261 f. 2 See Rosenthal, in Arcliiv f. Anat, Physiol., etc., 1860, pp. 217 ff. 310 SENSATIONS OF SMELL AND TASTE. by tumors, etc., may produce sensations of smell. Disturbances of the central organs, such as occur in certain cases of insanity, may doubtless have the same result. The powerful effect which some odors have upon the brains of certain persons, so that nausea, gid- diness, and other disturbances of feeling result, scarcely needs mention ; it cannot all be resolved into mental associations con- nected with the sense-impressions. 10. No approach can be made toward a scientific classification of the kinds of smells. 1 This specific sensation must, however, be carefully distinguished from the other forms of feeling with which it is most closely allied. Many supposed sensations of taste are really sensations of smell. Substances like ammonia and acetic acid powerfully excite the sensations of touch and common feeling through their action on the trigeminus as well as the olfactory nerve. Other sensations of touch and of the muscular sense are reflexly occasioned in such cases, and blend with the specific sensa- tions of smell in the total mental result. But of all the attempts to classify the qualitatively pure sensations of this sense, none can be said to have any scientific value. The division into pleasant and unpleasant smells depends upon the idiosyncrasies of individuals ; to some the smell of burning feathers, of assafoetida, of valerian, or of rank cheese, is pleasant. Frohlich's 2 classification into those which excite merely the olfactory nerve, and those which call out other sensations reflexly through their action on the trigeminus, is purely physiological and not psycho-physical ; moreover, it does not apply to sensations of smell, as such. When we classify the sen- sations according to the objects which produce them as practically we are obliged to do we are not distinguishing the qualities of our feeling ; the smell of a rose does not belong to a class of sen- sations as does a sour taste or the color red. No known principle will bring order out of the bewildering complexity of this sense. Sensations of smell cannot, like those of pressure, hearing, and sight, be schematized or represented as standing in any definite local or mathematical relations to each other. Smells cannot be con- ceived of as having a scale of pitch, or triangle of color-tones. As Wundt 3 declares, the sensations of smell form " a discrete mani- foldness which has an unknown arrangement." 11. The properties which any substance must possess in order to be odorous, and the nature of the action of the odorous particles 'For the entire subject, see von Vintschgau, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 266 f. 2 Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., 1851, VI., p. 322 f. 3 Physiolog. Psychologic, i., p. 386. NATURE OF ODOROUS SUBSTANCES. 311 upon the end-organ of smell, are wholly unknown as much so now as when, more than a half-century since, Cloquet confessed the complete ignorance of the scientific world on these matters. A great variety of phenomena appear, but no known law has control of them. Some plants are odorous by day alone, others by night alone ; still others only in the morning. Some plants have a smell when dried ; others give off only a weak odor when dry, but a stronger one when moistened. Of course, the effect of any odorous substance depends upon the ease with which it may be vaporized, and the speed and extent of its diffusion through the atmosphere. Camphor, musk, and other similar substances are distinguished for their long-continued and far-reaching effects. The discovery of Romieu, in 1756, that small bits of camphor on the surface of water have a rotary motion, has called out various investigations in the line suggested by this fact. Provost subse- quently (1799) observed that other odorous bodies have a similar motion on the surface of water, and that a very thin layer of water on a perfectly clear plate or glass withdraws itself as soon as pul- verized camphor is laid upon it. More recently still, Liegeois has noticed the same phenomena, wholly or in part, exhibited by some two hundred odorous substances of either vegetable or animal struct- ure. Minerals, according to this observer, do not behave in the same way. Some of these odorous substances seem to inhibit or check the rotary motion in others. He concludes that we are jus- tified in believing odorous substances to have the power, especially when in contact with water, of setting up a motion of these outside particles which distributes them through the atmosphere so that they reach the mucous membrane of the nasal passages. Just how they act upon the end-apparatus there it is impossible to say. The researches of Tyndall l and others as to the influence which odorous particles of different substances have upon the capacity of the air to absorb heat may possibly be combined with the foregoing re- searches in a way to suggest some tenable hypothesis touching the nature and action of the stimuli of this sense ; but thus far, as has been said, we cannot go beyond a confession of ignorance. 12. The condition of scientific attainment as to sensations of taste and their stimuli is only little better than that as to the allied sense of smell. The adequate specific stimulus for the nerves of this sense consists in certain tastable substances ; such substances, however, do not excite the end-apparatus unless they act upon it under definite conditions. Only fluid bodies, or such as are at least to some small degree soluble in a fluid or menstruum, excite 1 Heat as a Mode of Motion, pp. 341 ff. New York, 1868. 312 SENSATIONS OF SMELL AND TASTE. sensations of taste ; absolutely insoluble bodies are, without excep- tion, tasteless. This fact may be due to the concealed position of the inner cells of the gustatory flasks, which is such that they cannot be reached by substances undissolved. By no means all soluble sub- stances have a taste. No known law regulates the relation between the solubility of bodies and their power to excite sensations of this class. It is disputed whether any of the gases are direct excitants of the end-organs of taste. The monograph of A. Stick 1 maintains the tastable character of certain gases, on the ground that a stream of them, let fall upon the tongue when diy (so that they cannot well be absorbed by the saliva), produces the peculiar sensations of taste which these gases are known to possess. A stream of car- bonic-acid gas, for example, when acting on the dry edge of the tongue, has a taste which is described as sweetish sour. It is diffi- cult, however, to secure such a degree of dryness of the tongue as will not leave a moist capillary layer ; difficult, also, to exclude all the connected sensations of smell and common feeling. 2 It is doubtful whether the sensation of taste can be excited by mechanical means ; and there is no proof that heat can irritate the gustatory nerves. Certain authorities of the first rank have indeed described specific sensations of taste as mingled with the feelings which follow rubbing, pricking, and pressing the tongue. Henle observed a saltish taste to be excited by passing a current of air over the tongue ; Wagner a bitter taste by pressing down the base of the tongue with the dry finger ; Dr. Baly an acid or a saltish taste by repeatedly and lightly tapping the end of the tongue. The long-debated question as to the electrical stimulation of this sense seems now to be decided affirmatively. 3 It was discovered in 1752 that the application of two different metals to the tongue is followed by a peculiar sensation of taste. Volta recognized the fact that the effect of the metals is due to the electrical current called out between them. If the cathode is laid upon the upper surface of the tip of the tongue, a sensation is produced by the cur- rent passing out which is variously described as metallic, acid and metallic, or bitter and metallic, etc. ; but if the anode is applied to the same spot, the sensation produced by the entering current is described as acid, or acid and metallic, or bitter and metallic. In the former case, not infrequently, a strong current is needed to pro- 'Ueber d. Schmeckbarkeit d. Gase, Berlin, 1857; article in Annalen des Charite-Krankenhauses. 2 See von Vintschgau, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 196 f. 3 The whole question is discussed by von Vintschgau, ibid., p. 181 f.; and Pfliiger's Archiv, xx., pp. 81 ff. ELECTRICAL STIMULUS OF TASTE. 313 duce any sensation at all. Since the discovery of electrolysis, it has been objected that these effects are due to the decomposition of the fluids of the mouth and the consequent accumulation of free acid at the positive and free alkali at the negative pole ; they are therefore not to be ascribed to the direct action of the electrical current on the end-apparatus of sense. Experiments by du Bois- Reymond, Rosen thai, 1 and others have been directed toward an- swering this objection. The former showed that when a chain of four persons is arranged in such manner as to send a current of electricity through the tongue of one, the eyeball of another, and the muscles of a frog-preparation held by two of the four, the same current will cause simultaneously an acid taste, a flash of light, and a movement of the animal's muscles. Rosenthal discovered that, if two persons touch the tips of each other's tongues while one holds in a moist hand the positive and the other the negative pole, an electric current will cause the first person to have an alkaline and the second an acid taste. Still other experiments confirm the opinion that sensations of this sense may be directly clue to elec- trical stimulation. Attempts have been made to prove the possi- bility of exciting subjective sensations of taste by injecting tasta- ble substances into the veins of animals ; but the psychology of the subject has reaped no results from these attempts. Most of the alleged cases of such subjective origin are probably due to substances really brought to the tongue in the saliva. It is worth remarking here that sensations of taste rarely or never mingle in our dreams. 13. The question whether a tastable substance excites precisely the same sensation when applied to all portions of the organs of taste is a difficult one to answer satisfactorily (see Part I., Chap. V., 6). The tabulated results of different experimenters upon this question disagree considerably. Such disagreement is suggestive of idiosyncrasies of taste, and of doubt whether the different shades of the same class of sensations are either nicely discriminated or uniformly described by most persons. Descriptions which speak of the sensations as prickly, piquant, cooling, etc., show, of course, a combination of sensations of common feeling with those of special sense. The minor varieties of taste may be occasioned in a manner similar to that of the less important shades of color-sensations. It seems tolerably well established that sweet and sour are tasted chiefly with the tip of the tongue ; bitter and alkaline with its roots. The experiments of two of the principal observers, Horn and Picht, agree in the conclusion that nearly all substances (even sugar) call 1 Ueber d. elektrischen Geschmack ; Archivf. Anat., Physiol., 1860, p. 217 f. 314 SENSATIONS OF SMELL AND TASTE. out a bitterish taste when applied solely to the papillce circum- vallatae. 14. Most of the different kinds of tastes admit of being con- si'dered as compounds of a few simple sensations of this sense with each other and with sensations of smell, touch, common feeling, and muscular sense. Many so-called tastes are really chiefly smells. Physiologists generally distinguish four principal classes of tastes sweet, bitter, salt, and sour. Wundt ' adds to these four the alka- line and the metallic. But possibly the alkaline may be considered as a modification of the salt ; and the metallic is probably a compound taste, although its analysis is by no means easy. The attempt has been made by Valentin and others to reduce this number to two the sweet and the bitter. The sour is thus considered as not a pure sensation of taste, but as predominatingly a sensation of touch. Acids in concentrated form certainly bring into action the nerves of feeling.; but in very dilute form they seem to excite purely the sensa- tion of taste. The same thing is true of saltish substances. The bitter and the sweet are agreed by all to have the character of pure sensations of this specific sense. Powerful reflex sensations of the muscular sense are occasioned by strong stimulation of the nerves of the tongue, and these sensations blend with the specific sensa- tions of taste. There is no satisfactory reason to be given for classing the sensation of nausea under the sense of taste. The primary forms of taste are combined, in the greatest variety, with an indefinite number of shades under each of them. The hypothesis of four or more specifically different forms of the end- apparatus corresponding to the primary forms of sensation for example, " bitter- tasting " nerve-fibres, ' 'sweet- tasting " nerve- fibres, etc. offers, under the law of the specific energy of the nerves, an opportunity for explaining all the phenomena of this sense somewhat similar to that embraced by the so-called Young- Helmholtz theory of color-sensations. 15. Concerning that in tastable substances which fits them to excite the end-apparatus of the gustatory nerves, or concerning the molecular action of such substances, we have no information what- ever. No scale of stimuli, considered as differing in the rapidity of their vibration and corresponding to a scale of resulting sensations differing in pitch or tone, can be made out for sensations of taste. The great difficulties which accompany experiments upon this sense, and the fact that the most fundamental questions concerning its activities are still unanswered, place it in an unsatisfactory posi- tion only less hopeless than that occupied by the kindred sense of 'Physiolog. Psychologic, i., p. 382. SUBJECTIVE CHARACTER OF SOUND. 315 smell. We have in the case of taste, however, the very great ad- vantage of being able, at least loosely, to classify the sensations whose quality we are considering. 16. On passing to the consideration of sensations of sound much more help is received from the science of physics. But modern in- vestigations, in the form in which they concern us, do not go back of the great work of Helmholtz, 1 who made the entire field peculi- arly his own. Since the first appearance of this work, the subject has also been greatly enriched by the original researches of Oetting- en, 2 Mach, 3 Preyer, 4 Hensen, 6 Stumpf, 6 and others. In speaking of the stimuli of these sensations, we are still compelled to refer chiefly to the vibrations of air, which are only remote excitants of the end-organs of this sense. Neither physics nor physiology has yet been able to fix the precise locality in the organism (the ner- vous structure of the cochlea) where the immediate stimulation of the end-apparatus takes place ; or to tell what is the exact nature of its action. We are obliged, then, to confine ourselves in the main to considering a relation between the vibratory energy of the air and certain states of consciousness, without attempting to ex- plain the many intermediate links. All sensations which arise in the mind by means of the irritation of the auditory nerve are called sensations of sound. The word " sound " is thus used by psychology for a wholly subjective affair, which has no more resemblance to those vibrations which physics designates by the same word than has the taste sweet to the un- known physical properties that produce it. The trained mind, or "trained ear," as we say, has indeed the power directly to analyze a compound musical sound into its constituent elements. But each of these elements is purely a sensation, a subjective affair. It car- ries in itself no token that it has been produced by vibrations of any kind ; or that it sustains any numerical relation whatever to the vibrations of which some other sensation of sound is composed. We know nothing directly, through sensations, either of the struct- 1 Die Lehre von d. Tonempfindungen als physiolog. Grundlage f. d. Theorie d. Musik, Braunschweig, 1st edition, 1862; 3d edition, 1865; 3d edition, 1870 ; 4th edition, 1878. 2 Harmoniesystem in dualer Entwicklung, 1866. 3 Various contributions in the Archiv f . Ohrenheilkunde and elsewhere (especially the Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad.). 4 Ueber d. Grenzen d. Tonwahrnehmung, 1876 ; Sitzgsber. d. Jen. Ge- sellsch. f. Med., 1878 ; Akustische Untersuchungen, 1879. 5 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., pp. 3-142, and works by the same author there referred to. 6 Tonpsychologie, Leipzig, 1883 (Vol I. only). 316 SENSATIONS OF SOUND. ure of the ear or of vibrating strings and particles of air, or of the mathematics and physics of music. Sounds are of two classes tones, or musical sounds, and noises. The former are due to periodic motions of sonorous bodies ; the latter to non-periodic. Noises are those sounds which, objectively considered, are wanting in the periodic regularity of stimulation which characterizes all musical sounds, and, subjectively considered, in the peculiar, pleasant modification of consciousness which the latter produce. But noises accompany almost all tones ; and, con- versely, tones may be detected by the trained ear as mingled with the noises of every-day life. No player of the violin avoids all noise of scraping from the bow ; no stroke of a workman's hammer, or slamming of a door, that does not start and catch up into itself some trace of musical tone. The interest of science has hitherto been almost wholly concentrated upon musical sounds, and little has been done by either physics or physiology toward the analysis of noises. It is characteristic of a noise, according to Helmholtz, 1 that there is a quick and irregular alternation of different kinds of sensation of sound. This distinctive character can generally be detected " by attentive aural observation without artificial assist- ance." We can compound noises out of musical tones ; as, for ex- ample, by striking together all the keys of an octave on the piano. Hensen a distinguishes three " categories of unmixed noises" the " beats " or pulsations which disturb the purity of musical tones ; the crackle, crack, or crash ; and hissing sounds. These three shade into each other, and, when mixed with different kinds and quantities of musical sounds, make up the noises which we hear on every hand. 17. Musical sounds differ, not only in quality, but also in quantity or intensity of sensation as dependent upon the ampli- tude of the vibrations which produce them. With respect to their quality they are distinguished as either simple or complex, accord- ing as they result from one set of regularly recurrent (periodic) vi- brations of a given number in a given unit of time, or result from a combination of two or more sets of such vibrations. The musi- cal sounds of ordinary experience are complex. The blending of the simple tones into the complex tone is not so complete, however, that it cannot be at least partially analyzed directly by a trained ear. The complex sound, which results from this compounding of the contrasts or coincidences of several simple musical sounds, may be called by the term " clang " in this meaning borrowed from the usage of the German. The quality of tones considered as 1 The Sensations of Tone, etc., p. 11 f. London, 1875. 2 Hermann's Handb. d. PLysiol., III., ii., p. 17. THE LIMITS OF PITCH. 317 simple sensations is their pitch, which varies according to a scale of states of consciousness that are immediately apprehended and com- pared with each other, and that are discovered by objective meth- ods to correspond to a scale of changes in the number of the vi- brations of the waves which occasion them. The pitch of tones is therefore spoken of as "high" or "low," according to the place which we assign to the resulting sensations in this scale. Such place in the scale may be considered either with respect to the re- lation of any particular tone to the upper or lower limits of the scale, or with respect to the relation of the different tones to one another. " Clangs," or complex tones the musical sounds with which we are made acquainted by all ordinary experience have also a variable quality called timbre, or " color-tone ; " the timbre of the clang is dependent upon the pitch, number, and relative in- tensity of the simple tones which compose it. Thus a note having the same place in the musical scale (for example, a of the once- marked octave 440 vibrations) sounds differently, as we say, on the piano, violin, cornet, or when sung by the human voice. The pitch of the tone as produced by all these different methods is the same ; but its color-tone is determined by the character of the over-tones which are blended with the fundamental tone. 18. The pitch of tones depends ,upon the rapidity of the peri- odic vibrations (the number in a given unit of time usually one second) which occasion them, or what is the same thing upon the length of the sound-waves. This class of sensations, however, has both an upper and a lower limit ; that is to say, vibrations ei- ther below or above a certain number per second, or what is the same thing wave-lengths that are either shorter or longer than a given limit, produce no sensations of musical sound. The difficulty of determining these limits is great, because the intensity of ex- tremely low or high tones has to be enormously increased in order that they may be heard at all ; because the perceptions of the acoustic sense are so very blunt near the limits that the different sensations are almost certain to be confused ; because distracting sensations of common feeling mingle in these ranges of tone with the sensations of sound, and because near the lower limits the over-tones especially the octave above become so strong as to be mistaken for the fundamental tones. On account of these diffi- culties the older investigators made numerous mistakes. Indi- vidual peculiarities are also very important in determining sensa- tions of pitch. Some persons can hear tones below or above those audible to most others. Helmholtz * thought that sensations of 1 The Sensations of Tone, p. 268. London, 1875. 318 SENSATIONS OF SOUND. tone begin to cease when the vibrations fall below 34 per second ; some tuning-forks of great size, which vibrated only 28 times per second, seemed to him, however, to have a trace of tone in the form of a " weak drone." Preyer ' found that while 14 vibrations pro- duced no tone that he could hear, at 16 vibrations he was able to hear a tone ; others could distinguish a musical sound only at 19 or 23 vibrations. The same observer experienced as a sensation of musical sound more than 40,000 vibrations per second ; Turnbull found that the majority of those with whom he experimented could not hear more than about 20,000 to 22,500 vibrations per sec- ond, and only one a musician heard 30,000 ; Despretz succeeded in producing with tuning-forks audible tones that had 32,000 vi- brations. Blake thinks that persons with defective ear-drums are able to hear tones of higher pitch, reaching even 50,000 vibrations. Vibrations slower than 28 to 30 per second produce in most ears only a buzzing or groaning sound ; the more acute tones are unpleas- ant, or even painful, and finally inaudible to all ears. These results cannot be considered as very concordant or precise. They show, however, that the range of the average human ear is rather more than nine octaves, reaching from about A^ of the subcontra octave (27 vibrations per second) to above c 7 of the seven-times-marked octave (16,896 vibrations per second). The following table a gives the pitch of all the musical tones audi- ble to the human ear, in the key of C major, on a scale in which a 1 is fixed at 440 vibrations. Only about seven of the rather more than eleven octaves of the table are, however, usable in music ; these seven reach upward from C l of tfre contra, or from A^ of the subcontra octave, to 6 4 namely, the seven or seven and a half octaves of the modern piano. C D E F Gr A B Subcontra octave 16# 18 9 / 18 20% 22 24% 27X 30' 5 /i C a , D 2 , etc. Contra octave 33 trJJ 41 K 44 49 % 55 UK C,, DU etc. Great octave 6K 74^ 82V 88 99 110 123% C. D, etc. Small octave 132 148# 165 176 198 220 247^ c, d, etc. Once-marked octave Twice-marked octave Thrice-marked octave Four-times-marked octave Five-times-marked octave . Six-times-marked octave . . Seven-times-marked octave 264 528 1,056 2,112 4,224 8.448 16,896 33 792 297 594 1,188 2,376 4,752 9,504 19,008 3b 016 330 660 1,320 2,640 5.280 10.560 21,1*) 42 240 352 704 1,408 2,816 5,632 11,264 22,528 396 792 1,584 3,168 6,336 12,672 25,344 440 880 1,760 3,520 7,040 14,080 28.1M 495 990 1,980 3,960 7,920 15,840 31,680 c. d>, etc. c; d, etc. C", d3, etc. c, d, etc. c*, d, etc. c 8 , d, etc. c 7 , d 7 , etc. 1 Grenzen d. Tonwahrnehmung, p. 23 f. 2 Taken from Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., p. xiv. , and giving the German scale ; the French fixes a 1 at 435 vibrations ; the theoretical pitch in England gives 512 for c 8 . C4L SENSITIVENESS TO PITCH. 319 19. The sensitiveness of the ear to differences of pitch varies greatly with different individuals, and for the different octaves of the musical scale. Preyer found that unpractised persons, within the octaves from c to c 3 (132-1,056 vibrations by the table, but 128-1,024 by the scale adopted for his experiments), distinguish a difference of from 8 to 16 vibrations as producing a distinct dif- ference in the sensation of pitch. Extreme cases of deafness to differences in pitch are recorded ; as, for example, that of the man 1 who, in the middle part of the scale, could not distinguish an in- terval of less than a third, and, in the higher and lower parts, of less than a seventh. 2 Persons insensitive to differences of a tone or half-tone, who are sometimes said "not to know one note from another," are by no means infrequently met with. Differences of the two ears of the same person, in the fineness of this kind of per- ception, are common enough ; in certain cases the difference may amount to a half-tone or more. Sensitiveness to pitch is generally capable of rapid cultivation, and may reach a high degree of per- fection in persons who have what is called " a good natural ear" for musical tones, if the ear be also highly trained. Such persons may become able to discriminate differences in the sensations caused by changing the number of vibrations not more than a third of a single vibration per second, in the region of the scale between a 1 and c 2 . In the octave from b l to b* more than 200 tones are distinguish- able. But above and below this region the distinctions possible are less fine ; above c 5 even well-trained ears commit errors in iden- tifying two notes that differ by 100 or even by 1,000 vibrations. It appears, then, that not only the musical quality of tones, but also the power of distinguishing differences in them, diminishes rapidly as we approach the upper and lower limits of the scale. The fineness of the possible distinctions of purity of interval also differs for different individuals and for different intervals. The following table is compiled by Hensen 3 from data drawn from Preyer's investigations. The bracketed numbers of the first column indicate the proportion in which the vibrations of the different intervals stand to those of the fundamental tone ; the quotient n' : n = i, the variation from the pure interval which was found detectable in each case ; F = the number of vibrations off from the pure interval which is the least distinguishable ; and S is the de- 1 Reported by Grant Allen, in Mind, 1878, p. 157 f. 2 Comp. the lengthy and interesting discussion on ' ' Individualitat des Sin- nes und Gedachtnisses fur Tonqualitaten," in Stumpf, Tonpsychologie I , pp. 262 ff. 3 See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 114. 320 SENSATIONS OF SOUND. nominator of the fraction which indicates the sensitiveness of the ear to the purity of each interval INTERVAL. 71. ri. i V. & Fourth (1.333) 187.58 251.23 1.3396 1.02 211 Fifth (1.5) 167.68 251.23 1.4983 0.23 822 Minor Sixth (1.6) 143.66 231.41 1.6108 1.19 148 Major Third (1.25) j 139.60 163.68 1.2437 0.73 198 Minor Third (1.20) 139.62 207.54 175.53 251.23 1.2572 1.2102 0.89 1.90 193 117 Octave (20) 50040 1,001 2.0004 13 5 000 Whole Tone (1.125) 215.15 243 51 1.1291 085 274 Immediate judgment of absolute tone (as the a 1 carried in mind by musicians) is possible ; judgment between two tones as to which is higher or lower in pitch is also immediate, and may be exercised independently of everything except the two sensations themselves. The latter judgment is the common power of mind belonging to this sense ; the former is, as a rule, exercised only by skilled persons, and by them only very imperfectly. Experiments of Stumpf,' upon himself and three other musicians, showed that the mistakes in judgment of absolute tone amounted, in the lower region of the scale (from C 1 to B^, to 15^-100$ of the trials ; in the middle region (from a-y 1 , or from g-e*), to 0^-70$ ; in the upper region (from g a -f*, or from/* 3 -a 4 ), to 7^-80$. Only one of the four persons experimented upon seemed to approach the point of infallibility. Judgment of absolute tone is, therefore, a different matter from that which makes distinctions in intervals or in the least observable differences of pitch, and is much more precarious. 20. Those psychologists appear to be in the right who claim that some power of the mind immediately to judge differences of quality in pitch, purely as such, must be assumed in order to ac- count for the foregoing phenomena. 3 Such judgment, however, may be, and ordinarily is, much assisted by auxiliary discrimina- tions of other sensations which blend with those of musical tone. Among such secondary helps the most important are the muscular sensations which accompany the innervation of the larynx and other organs used in producing musical tones. For we ordinarily inner- 'Tonpsjchologie, I., pp. 305 ff. 8 On this subject, comp. Lotze, Medicin. Psychologie, pp. 265 ff., 480 f. ; Strieker, Studien uber d. Association d. Vorstellungen, 1883, p. 2 f.; G. E. Miiller, Zur Grundlegung d. Psycho-physik, Berlin, 1878, pp. 276 ff. ; and Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., pp. 134 ff. THE JUDGMENT OF TONES. 321 vate these organs (at least in an inchoate and partial way) that is, \ve sound the note to ourselves when trying carefully to judge of its pitch. But the niceness of these muscular sensations is not great enough, even when most highly trained, to account for the discriminations of the " good ear." The trained musician can de- tect by ear a difference in quality between two tones of 400 and 4001 vibrations per second ; but the most skilful singer Jenny Lind, for example scarcely succeeds in singing in quarter-tones. Moreover, the relative powers of larynx and ear by no means keep pace with each other in the same person. It should also be re- membered that all our ordinary discriminations of musical sound apply to composite tones, or " clangs ; " in discriminating these we are aided by the color-tone, or tone-feeling, which belongs to each note as sounded by some sonorous body with whose peculiarities we are previously more or less acquainted. It follows, then, that the judgment is supplied, by the varying qualities of musical tones, with the means for arranging them in a continuous series which may be symbolized by different positions assigned along an uninterrupted straight line. Of any three un- like tones, one must be, and only one can be, arranged as respects pitch between the other two. And whenever any two tones, as m and n, are given, another sliding tone, which begins with m and ends with n, is possible. Moreover, within the bounds of our ex- perience of tones, as we advance along the scale toward either the upper or the lower limit, we see no tendency in the qualities of the sensations to approach each other. In this respect the scale of sound-tones is wholly different from that of color-tones. There are not two ways, for example, of getting from a j to e 3 (one through ft 1 , c 2 , etc., and the other through g 1 , /', etc., around to e 3 , c?, 3 and then c 8 ), as there are two ways of going from yellow to blue (i.e., through green and blue-green, or through violet, red, and orange). We speak, then, of the series of tones as a constant and infinite series ; although, of course, no series of states of con- sciousness is really infinite, and although the upper and lower limits of the musical scale, as well as the limits of the least ob- servable differences between two tones, are not constant but vari- able for different individuals. The symbolism taken from relations of space, which we employ when we speak of certain acoustic sensations as "high" and of others as "low" in pitch, or when we distinguish so-called "in- tervals" between the tones as large and small, is strictly applicable only to the complex tactual, visual, and muscular sensations that accompany the acoustic. In sounding the lower tones with the 21 322 SENSATIONS OF SOUND. voice the organs are depressed ; in sounding the higher, they are elevated. Low notes have a certain breadth and gravity which corresponds to the foundations of a spatial structure ; as sensations they require more time to come into and depart from conscious- ness, as it were. A great intensity and slower tempo belong to the bass-viol than to the violin. We read up for the notes of highest pitch, and down for those of lowest pitch, in the written musical scale. 21. We have seen that tones, like rays of light, come to us as compounded into " clangs ; " these really composite tones being esteemed as single notes in ordinary experience. The nature of such composition determines the so-called "timbre," or "color- tone," of the notes. Each sensation of a clang is a summing-up in consciousness of several absolute qualities of musical sound ; the stimulus which occasions this complex subjective state is a complex sound-wave made up of the contrasts and coincidences of several single waves that have the character of simple pendulum vibrations. The quality of each clang depends upon the form of this complex sound-wave. We need not consider in detail the physics and mathematics of such complex waves. It is enough to observe that those single tones whose vibrations stand in simple mathematical relations to each other, when combined into a clang, cause a pe- culiarly pleasant sensation ; those whose vibrations stand in com- plex mathematical relations make, when combined, an unpleasant sensation. In an octave of the musical scale the eight different notes stand in the following ratios to each other. 1 C:D:E:F:G:A:B:C' 1 : f : f : f : f : f : -V- : 2 8 : 9 : 10 : lOf : 12 : 13J : 15 : 16 That is to say, while the tone C makes one vibration, D makes nine-eighths, and E makes five-fourths, etc. ; or while C makes 8 vibrations D makes 9, E makes 10, etc. Of these relations in the number of vibrations the simplest is, of course, that of the octave, 1:2. The acoustic waves which constitute the stimuli of each complex sensation called a " clang," accordingly, also permit of being regarded as the summing-up of the waves of a fundamental tone and of certain partial tones belonging to the fundamental tone. These partial tones, or " over-tones," are called "the har- monics" of the " clang," or single compound tone. 22. When two or more "clangs "are sounded together, the re- sult is what is called either a "chord " or a " discord." The former 1 FOT the mathematics and physics of tones, see Hensen, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., IIL, ii., pp. 4ff. CONSONANCE AND DISSONANCE. 323 is a pleasant, the latter an unpleasant, complex of sensations ; con- sonance and dissonance are thus spoken of as qualities of sensations of musical sound. Thus, if c and c l are struck together upon a weil-tuned piano, the combination of clangs is a chord, or harmo- nious musical sound ; but if c and d, or c and c sharp, or c and its seventh, b above, are simultaneously sounded, then the com- bination of tones is unpleasant. Cases of consonance and disso- nance differ from those just considered under the term "clang" only with respect to the relative strength of the partial tones as compared with the fundamental tones : in the clang the over-tones are weak as compared with the one fundamental tone ; but in the chord or discord the fundamental tones of the other clangs are, of course, strong, and stand in powerful relations of consonance or dissonance both toward the fundamental tone of the lowest clang and toward its partial tones. All the partial tones of the different combined clangs enter into the formation of the total result pro- duced. According to the table already given (p. 322), the Octave is the most perfect possible consonance (1:2); then the Twelfth (1 : 3), the Fifth (2 : 3), the Fourth (3 : 4), the Sixth (3 : 5), the ma- jor Third (4 : 5), the minor Third (5 : 6). With the relation of the Third we come upon the borders of dissonance ; indeed, the ancient Greeks and Eomans considered the Third a dissonance, and avoided it in singing, because, as Helmholtz supposes, their ears were more sensitive to " beats " than ours. The consonance of the Sixth and that of the Fourth have also been much disputed. The major Sixth and major Third are called by Helmholtz "medial consonances ;" the minor Third and minor Sixth, "imperfect consonances." An analysis of the harmonics of these consonances yields the fol- lowing results, 1 which show the amount of coincidence belonging to the acoustic waves of the different tones when combined in a chord with a fundamental tone. Twelfth Fifth Fourth Major Third ( c 1 { 1 i; i: 1 c 2 i i i g* c 2 g 1 | g' 2 d 3 O i g i c s e 2 g 2 g 1 c c' g' c* I* g 1 e 2 g 2 f 1 c 2 c 1 g 1 c 2 fa 2 e 2 e 1 b 1 e 2 The major Sixth is similar in the form of its harmonics to the major Third. 1 Comp. Helmholtz, The Sensations of Tone, p. 281 f. 324 SENSATIONS OF SOUND. Two psycho-physical causes for the characteristic feelings which belong to sensations of consonance and dissonance, respectively, may be assigned with more or less of probability. The first is that proposed by Helmholtz. 1 The feeling of dissonance which is pro- duced by sounding together two notes that differ only by a semi- tone is found to be increased when the difference in the pitch of the notes is still further diminished. Successive shocks called " beats " occur, less frequently but more decidedly and unpleasantly, as the pitch of the notes becomes more nearly the same. The feel- ing of dissonance is found to reach its height when the number of beats is about 30 per second. For example, if b l (495 vibrations) and c 2 (528 vibrations) are struck together, the number of beats is 33 (528 495=33), and the dissonance is very strongly marked. In all marked dissonances such beats occur at the rate of from 20 to 40 in a second. The unpleasant effect in consciousness is an- alogous to that produced by all sudden and rapid intermission of stimulation ; as, for example, the flickering of light or the scraping of uneven surfaces over the skin. The feeling of consonance is due to the absence of beats. In addition to Helmholtz's negative reason, Oettingen has proposed the positive one, that the pleasantness of harmony is due to what he calls the " tonicity " and " phonicity " of certain intervals and combined notes. " Tonicity " is the prop- erty of being recognized as a constituent of a single fundamental tone which is designated by the name "tonic." "Phonicity" is that property of a chord or interval which consists in the possession of certain partial tones that are common to all tones. The first of these qualities of harmony seems to ally the pleasure it yields to that which follows even the obscure and only half-conscious per- ception, as it were, of all relations, as such, between our sensa- tions. 23. In order that the physical apparatus of hearing may act as the organ of those wonderfully fine discriminations which belong to the most analytic of all the senses, it would seem that it must possess an outfit of end-organs with structure sufficiently minute to serve as a basis for a satisfactory development of "local signs." The number of the cells of Corti, and of their separate terminal auditory nerves, has been calculated by Hensen 2 at about 16,400 ; by Waldeyer 3 at 20,000. It is doubtful, however, whether even this large number will suffice to account for that niceness of audi- tory discriminations which we have seen to be possible. 1 The Sensations of Tone, p. 255 f . 2 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 115. 3 Strieker's Gewebelehre, II., p. 954. CHAPTEE IV. THE QUALITY OF SENSATIONS. [CONTINUED.] 1. The analysis of the qualities of different Sensations of Sight is much more intricate than that of any of the other senses. They may all be described as sensations of color and light ; but an in- definite number of colors is known to experience, and as many grades of the sensation of light. Moreover, the quantity of the white light which acts as stimulus upon the eye has an important effect upon the quality of the resulting color-sensation ; in other words, the tone of the color is dependent upon the amount of white light which is mixed with the " saturated " spectral color. The size of the colored object and the resulting breadth of the sensation, as well as the intensity of the stimulus and the time during which it acts, also affect the quality of the sensation. Still further, the same stimulus produces different sensations as it falls upon different por- tions of a normal retina ; while a considerable class of persons are color-blind, or incapable of certain kinds of color-sensations. The previous condition of the retina, and the relations between the con- tiguous portions when any considerable area of it is under stimu- lation, must also be taken into account. The fundamental laws governing sensations of sight can, therefore, be discovered only by excluding for the time many of those variable elements which, in fact, always enter into the determination of the exact quality of such sensations. Thus defining the first problem before us, we find that it may be stated in the following terms. What sensations result from the stimulation of a sufficiently small, but not too small, area of the most central part of a normal retina, for a given time, when it is not fatigued and the eye is at rest, and with neither too great nor too small intensity of a given kind of light? Such sen- sations may be called (though somewhat ineptly) normal sensations of color. When the foregoing question is answered we may go on to consider the most important variations possible on account of various forms of departure from the so-called normal conditions of sensation. 2. The ordinary stimulus, the application of which to the eye gives rise to the sensations of sight, is light or certain exceedingly 326 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. rapid oscillations of luminiferous ether. Some forms of mechani- cal and electrical stimuli also produce the same sensations. Any violent shock to the eye, such as a blow upon the back of the head, may fill the whole field of vision with an intense light. The action of mechanical pressure of moderate intensity upon a limited part of the retinal elements may be studied by rolling the eyeball in- ward and using the fingernail, or a small, blunted stick, upon the outer surface of the closed lids. By such stimulation disks of light (called phosphenes), with darkly colored edges, are produced in the field of vision of the closed eye. Some observers have claimed that very strenuous exertion of the apparatus for accom- modation occasioned in their eyes similar phenomena ("phos- phenes of accommodation "). On making or breaking a weak elec- trical current sent through the eye, the entire field of vision is lighted up ; the constant current also seems to excite the optic nerve. The quality of the sensations thus excited is found to de- pend upon the direction of the current through the nerve. When the current is ascending, the place where the nerve enters the ret- ina appears as a dark disk upon a field of vision that is bright- er than it, and of pale violet-color ; when it is descending, as a bright bluish disk on a field of dark or reddish-yellow color. The retina has also a " light of its own " (Eigenlicht) ; for its nervous elements are rarely or never inactive, but have a continuous tonic excitation. Hence the most gorgeous and varied coloring is often seen when the eyes are closed in a darkened room. This normal light of the retina is not constant either in degree or in quality ; both the form and the color of the different minute parts of the field of vision, as lighted by it, are very changeable. It may be said to have the rhythmic movement of all tonic excitation. Such excitation is supposed to be due to chemical effects, wrought by the changing supply of blood, upon the nervous elements of the retina and (perhaps, also) of the central organs of the brain. The peculiar action of the ascending and descending electrical current has been thought by some 1 to be due to its catelectrotonic or anelectrotonic effect upon the central organs by way of the optic nerve. Aubert has estimated the retina's own light to be about equal (in his case) to half the brightness of a sheet of white paper when seen in the full light of the planet Venus. 3. The place where the light acts (and here, as is supposed, only indirectly through photo-chemical and perhaps electro-motive changes in the pigments of the eye) upon the end-organs of vision 1 See Fick, Physiolog. Optik, in Hermann's Handb. d. PhysioL, III., i., p. THE FINENESS OF VISION. 327 must be located at the back of the retina in the rods and cones (see Part I., Chap. V., 18-22). The argument by which we have connected the analytic power of vision with the structure of this nervous layer may be carried yet further into details. It appears likely that each element of the structure at least in some parts of the retina should be regarded as an isolated sensitive spot, which corresponds on the one side to definite excitations from the appro- priate stimuli, and on the other side to the smallest localized sen- sations of color and light. In order that two visual sensations may be seen as separate, yet side by side, in an object, two neigh- boring retinal elements must be excited by the stimulus. This implies that the breadth of retinal surface stimulated must be, at least, about that of the distance between two such elements. With this hypothesis the facts of histology and experimental physiology agree fairly well. The degree of accuracy which sight can attain is dependent upon the size of the retinal elements directly affected by the light. 1 Hooke observed that no one can distinguish two stars as two, unless they are apart at least 30" ; few, indeed, can distin- guish them when less distant from each other than 60". E. H. Weber could not perceive as separate two lines whose distance did not cover at least 73" of the angle of vision ; Helmholtz puts the limit of his sharpness of vision at 64". The numbers 60", 64", and 73", in the angle of vision, correspond to a size of the retinal elements varying from 0.00438 mm. to 0.00526 mm.; and this agrees very closely with the calculated breadth (by Kolliker) of the thickness of the cones in the yellow-spot namely, 0.0045 mm. to 0.0055 mm. (0.000177 in. to 0.0002165 in.). If white lines be drawn on a dark ground so closely together as to approximate this limit of vision, they will ap- Flo> go._ A shows the appearance of Iine8 pear, not straight, but knotted and nicked. This fact is due to the action of the stimulus on the mo- saic of rods and cones, as seen by the accompanying figure (No. 90). The diminishing sharpness of vision as we move away on the sur- face of the retina from its most central area corresponds to the 1 See Helmholtz, Haiidb. d. Physiolog. Optik, Leipzig, 1867, p. 215 ff.; Fick, in Hermann's Haiidb. d. Physiol., III., i.,p. 152 f.; von Kries, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1882 (Appendix), p. 24 f. drawn very closely together, which is sup- posed to be due to their falling upon the nervous elements of the retina in the man- ner shown by B. 328 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. comparative paucity of the nervous elements which enter into the structure of the peripheral parts. 4. Excluding consideration of those changes in the quantity, as such, of visual sensations which are produced by changes in in- tensity of the light, and confining our attention to what has already been defined as the normal action of the eye (comp. p. 325), we treat scientifically all the different sensations of sight when we describe (1) the wave-lengths of the different kinds of colored light, or pure color-tones, and (2) the relations in which the different colors stand with respect to the amounts of white (or colorless light) and saturated light (or light of pure color-tone) which enter into them. The foregoing distinctions in the quality of our color-sensations may be confirmed by an appeal to experience. Ked is unlike yellow in "color-tone," and both are unlike blue ; but orange is more like either red or yellow than it is like blue, while violet is more like blue than it is like either yellow or red. Yet we distinguish colors of the same class (red, green, or violet) as being like or unlike with respect to their " brightness ; " and in respect of brightness, a certain shade of red may differ more from another shade of red than it differs from some shade of yellow, green, or blue. The bright- ness of a color is, scientifically speaking, dependent both upon the degree of saturation which the color possesses and upon the total intensity of the light. 5. A color-tone is said to be " pure "or " saturated " when it is free from all admixture of other color-tones. Pure or saturated color-tones can be obtained only by use of the spectrum, which, on account of the different refrangibility of the different colored rays that compose it, analyzes the compound ray of white light into its constituent color-tones. By stimulating with different simple rays those nervous elements which have the same local situation at, or very near, the pole of the eye, we test the question whether each special color-sensation corresponds to a special physical con- struction of the stimulus. It is thus discovered that the compound ray of sunlight, so far as it stimulates the human eye, is made up of components formed by oscillations varying all the way between about three hundred and seventy billions and about nine hundred billions per second ; and that the color-tone of the sensation changes as the number of these oscillations changes. The following table ' exhibits these facts on the scale of Fraunhofer's lines, which mark those portions of the spectrum where its principal colors appear most obvious to the normal eye. 'Taken from Pick, Physiolog. Optik, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiolog., III., i., p. 173. COLOR-TONES OF THE SPECTRUM. 329 Name of the line. Number of vibra- tions per second. Wave-length in the air. B Billions. 450 Millimeters. 0.0006878 c . 472 0.0006564 D 526 0.0005888 E 589 0.0005260 F 640 0.0004843 G 722 0.0004291 H 790 0.0003928 Rays of light which have a number of oscillations less than four hundred and seventy billions per second, so far as they affect the retina at all, occasion the sensation of Red ; and this sensation does not vary essentially in quality when the oscillations are four hundred and forty to four hundred and sixty billions. But when their number increases beyond four hundred and seventy billions (C) the quality of the sensation changes rapidly, takes on a yellow tone (Orange- yellow), and finally, at about five hundred and twenty-six billions (D), corresponds to what we definitely call Yellow. This yellow becomes greenish as the oscillations increase in number, until they reach about five hundred and eighty-nine billions (E), when Green appears. (Changes from yellow to green occupy only a small zone in the spectrum.) The green in turn becomes bluish ; at six hun- dred and forty billions (F) Blue begins to appear. From this point to seven hundred and twenty-two billions (F-G) the color-tones that lie between blue and violet are run through ; beyond the latter number Violet comes to view. The color-tones of the spectrum are, therefore, not sharply sepa- rated, but pass gradually into each other. The nearer together two colors are situated in the spectrum, the more nearly do they corre- spond in the quality of their sensations. Nor has the spectrum any sharply defined limit at either end, but passes gradually into black more gradually at the violet than at the red end. The energy of the ultra-red rays, as measured by their physical and chemical action, is greater than that of the more highly refrangible rays. The fact that these rays do not excite visual sensations must, then, be due to the structure of the retina. The ultra-violet end of the spectrum has been made visible for a certain extent by experiment ; * it produces the sensation of a glimmer of lavender-gray color. Our inability to perceive these ultra-red and ultra-violet rays is not to be considered an imperfection of the eye, as Tyndall thought. It is rather purposeful, and of the greatest importance for vision ; since, if these ultra rays were visible, the clearness of objects would ! See Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, p. 232 f . 330 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. be much disturbed by the chromatic aberration of the refracting apparatus of the eye. 1 6. Besides the foregoing distinctions of color-tones, the im- pression made by the green-yellow of the spectrum (D-E, and im- mediately about D) is by far the strongest ; or, as we should say, this color is naturally the "brightest " of the spectral colors. From the region immediately around D, the brightness of the color-tones diminishes toward both the red and the violet ends of the spectrum at first quickly, then more slowly, and then more quickly again. Such a relation cannot be due to the spectrum as an objective affair ; for if we measure by other physical means the amount of energy belonging to its different regions, we find that of the red rays (which are by no means brightest) to be strongest. We must, G H FIG. 91. (From Fick.) The letters on the horizontal line stand for Fraunhofer's lines. The ordinates of the interrupted curved line show the brightness of rays as seen ; the ordinates of the dark curved line, the intensity of the rays as measured by calorific effect. then, seek an explanation in the structure of the retina, and conclude that it is peculiarly sensitive to stimulations by oscillations of about five hundred and fifty billions per second. The sensitiveness of the retina to slight variations in color-tone, as dependent upon differ- ences in the wave-lengths of the stimulus, is also different at different portions of the spectrum. It is greatest in the green and blue- green regions (D and F). The following table represents both the foregoing laws. The numbers of the second and third columns show the relative bright- ness with which the different colors of the spectrum appear to the eye, as calculated by different methods and by two observers. It will be seen that the results agree substantially, though by no means perfectly. In the last two columns the letter sstand for Fraunhofer's lines, and the figures give the fractional variation in the wave-lengths which produces an observable variation in the color- tone for different regions of the spectrum. 2 1 See Fick, Compendium d. Physiologie, 3d edition, p. 181 f . ; and Her- mann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 181 f. 2 See Helmholtz's Physiolog. Optik, p. 317 f.; von Kries, in Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1882 (Appendix), pp. 56-76 ; Fick, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol. , III. , i. , p. 174 f . ; Mandelstamm and Dobrowolsky, in Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, XIII. , ii., p. 399, and XVIII. , i., p. 66. MIXED COLOR-IMPRESSIONS. 331 Praunhofer. Vierordt. Mandelstamm and Dobrowolsky. Red, B 32 94 640 1,000 480 170 31 5.6 22 128 780 1,000 370 128 8 0.7 B T*T T*T % U4T) if* TiTT 72 T** Orange, C C Reddish -yellow D C-D Yellow D-E D Green E D-E Blue-green, F . .... E Blue, G E-F Violet, H F G H.... 7. The colors of every-day experience, like its musical tones, are not simple and pure color-tones, such as are obtained by spectral analysis ; they are composite. Inquiry must therefore be raised as to the effect produced in sensation from the co-working of two homogeneous rays of light upon the same elements of the retina under all the normal conditions to which reference was previously made. In pursuing this inquiry no direct assistance can be ob- tained from the discriminations of consciousness ; for sensations of color, unlike those of musical clang, cannot be mentally analyzed into their constituent elements. The science of optics makes us acquainted, however, with the following facts : When the wave- lengths of the two colors mixed vary but slightly (a few billions of oscillations in a second) from each other, the color resulting from the mixture lies between, and may be recognized as a "shade "-of, the colors mixed. By selecting for mixture color-tones that lie apart at all possible distances along the spectrum, an indefinite number of impressions of color may be obtained, which all differ from those obtained by the homogeneous colors. These mixed color-impressions, however, are not all different from each other ; so that the number of the qualities of resulting sensations is far less than that of the compound physical processes which stimulate the retina. Their character depends both upon the place of the spec- trum from which the simple color-tones are selected for mixture, and also upon the relative intensity of the ones selected. For ex- ample, if a ray of four hundred and fifty billions of oscillations per second (red) be mixed with one of seven hundred and ninety billions (violet), a new series of impressions of color (the purples) is attained by varying the intensities of the two. These impressions are more or less like red or like violet, according to the relative amounts of the rays of four hundred and fifty billions and of seven hundred and ninety billions which enter into the mixture. Moreover, there are found to be two ways of advancing by this process of mixing color- 332 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. tones toward any one of the composite colors. Thus, we may pass from yellow to blue either through green-yellow, green, and blue- green, or through orange, red, purple, and violet. The following table ' is of interest in this connection. Where two colors are given as resulting from the mixture, the variation is to be understood as dependent upon the prevailing intensity of one of the two compo- nents. Components. Tone of the color obtained by mixture. Degree of saturation. Red and Yellow Orange Spectral Yellow. Spectral Yellow and Green .... Yellow-green . . . ... Whitish. Yellow-green and Blue-green.. .. Green Very whitish. Green and Cyanic Blue Blue-green ... Whitish. Cyanic Blue Spectral Cyanic Blue and Violet Indigo Spectral. Red and Yellow-green . . Orange or Yellow Spectral. Red and Green Violet and Blue-green . . Orange or Yellow or Yellow-green Infligo or Cyanic Bine Whitish. Spectral. Violet and Green Indigo or Cyanic Blue or Blue-green Whitish. Violet and Orange Red Whitish Red and Cyanic Blue Indigo or Violet Whitish Violet Slightly whitish 8. The number of colors distinguishable by the human eye is not easily stated with accuracy ; like the number of musical tones, it varies with different individuals. The usual number of seven fundamental colors, as fixed by Newton, with the intent of forming an octave in the scale of color-tones, has no sufficient claim to acceptance. Six of the seven namely, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet are indeed names in common use. But indigo, as an intermediate tone, or kind of semitone, between blue and violet, has perhaps no more real right to recognition than various other intermediate color-tones. Donders 2 puts the number of color-tones distinguishable in oil-colors at one hundred ; von Kries 3 the rec- ognizable number of spectral tints at about two hundred and thirty. But each of these yields different sensations of color ac- cording to the degree of its saturation or purity, due to freedom from admixture of white light. Another series of variations of sen- sation must be allowed for, which are due to differences in " bright- ness " or intensity. Introducing these two variable elements, von Kries calculates the number of distinctions of color-sensations, possible for all degrees of purity of tone and intensity of light, at 1 Made according to investigations by J. J. Miiller, and taken from Fick, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 190. 8 Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, XXVII. 3 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1882 (Appendix), p. 58 f. THE COMPLEMENTARY COLOKS. 333 about five hundred thousand to six hundred thousand. This num- ber stands midway between the " many millions " of which Au- bert speaks and the five thousand allowed by Donders. Herschel thought that the workers on the mosaics of the Vatican must have distinguished at least thirty thousand different colors. 9. Experiment also shows that if certain color-tones with a given intensity are united on the retina, the result is a sensation unlike that of any other of the colors, whether pure or mixed. This sensation we call " white," and the two colors which by their admixture produce it are called " complementary." Complementary colors may be mixed upon the retina in various ways ; either by al- lowing two spectral rays properly selected to be superimposed at the same spot, or by blending the reflected images of two colored wafers, or by blending the direct visual impressions of colored surfaces on a swiftly revolving top or wheel, etc. But however mixed, the resultant sensation is that of a so-called " white " color in which all trace of the constituent elements is lost. Following is a table of complementary colors : * Color. Wave-length. Complementary color. Wave-length. Relation of wave-lengths. Red 2,425 Green-blue . . . 1,818 1,334 Oraneje 2 244 Blue 1 809 1,240 Gold-yellow 2 162 Blue . . 1,793 1,206 Gold-yellow 2,120 Blue 1,781 1,190 Yellow 2,095 Indigo-blue. . 1,716 1,221 Yellow 2,085 Indigo-blue. . . 1,706 1,222 Green-yellow 2 082 Violet 1 600 J ? nd 1,301 } less 10. If the foregoing facts and laws are held to be true of the " normal " connection between light and visual sensations, then various classes of circumstances must be taken account of as " ab- normal," which, nevertheless, enter into all our daily experience with this sense. Indeed, the connection between stimulus and sensation is not the same for different individuals who possess sub- stantially the same color-sensations ; frequently the complementary colors for two different individuals are not precisely the same. Even the two eyes of the same individual often differ perceptibly in this regard. Important changes in the quality of the sensations, other than those directly ascribable to changes in the wave-lengths of light, take place when the intensity of the light approaches ei- 1 Taken from Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, p. 277. The numbers are given in hundred-millionths of a Parisian inch, and may be reduced to millimetres by multiplying by 27.07. 334 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. ther a maximum or a minimum. At the maximum intensities of the stimulus all sensations of color- tone cease, and even homoge- neous rays appear white. Previous to reaching this maximum, red and green pass over into yellow. At the minimum intensities of light every color-tone except the pure red of spectral saturation appears colorless when seen alone on a perfectly black ground. The different colors appear and disappear, as such, at different degrees of intensity of the stimulus green, among them all, re- maining \isible in the weakest light. They all also change their tone as the light which falls on them diminishes ; but it is scarcely possible to describe the law of this change, on account of the great difficulty of distinguishing color- tones in very weak light. 11. Changes of color also take place when the time of the action of the light is reduced to a minimum. Sensations of satu- rated color can be produced by instantaneous illumination of the spectrum with the electrical spark. More time is needed, however, to produce these sensations with smaller intensities of the light. The different colors, even when of the same brightness, appear to re- quire different amounts of time in order to reach the maximum of their effect red, 0.0573; blue, 0.0913 ; green, 0.133 of a second. 1 The tone of the color varies with the duration of the impression as well as with the intensity of the light. Very minute objects, too, appear of a different color on account of their size. In general, the larger the surface, the less the intensity of the light necessary to produce the sensation of any particular color-tone ; the greater the intensity of the light, the smaller the surface which will suffice for such sensation. Fick 2 has shown that the color-sensations derived from small distinct points support each other, as it were, in the same way as the contiguous points of a colored surface. For if we make with a fine needle a single hole (of about 0.6 mm. in diameter) in a sheet of paper and look through it at colored paper distant some six and a half metres, the color of the paper cannot be dis- tinguished. But if the number of holes be as many as sixteen, the color can be distinguished at the same distance, even when the holes through which we look are smaller. Subsequent experiment 3 has shown that the smaller the distance between the single perfo- rations, the greater the distance at which the eye can recognize colors through them. In general, then, two weak sensations, each of which belongs to one eye, may fuse together into one strong one. 1 According to Kunkel, in Pfliiger's Archiv, ix. , p. 207. 3 Pfltiger's Archiv, xvii., p. 152. 3 See Dobrowolsky, in Pfluger's Archiv, xxxv., p. 536 f. KINDS OF COLOR-BLINDNESS. 335 12. Very important changes in the visual sensations occur as dependent on the place of the retina which is stimulated. In this respect a great difference exists between the central and the pe- ripheral parts. The entire field of this organ may be somewhat indefinitely divided into three zones a central or polar, a middle, and an outer or peripheral. It is probably true that the periph- eral parts of the retina produce no sensations which cannot be produced by stimulating the central zone. 1 But it is equally true that, under the same circumstances, the same stimulus produces a markedly different effect upon sensation when applied to differ- ent localities of the retina. Rays which, falling on the polar zone, produce the impression of red, yellow, or green, all make an im- pression of yellow when they fall on the surrounding zone (a few millimetres from the fovea centralis) ; and this yellow is so much the paler, the greener the impression on the polar zone. Rays which make on the polar zone the impression of blue or violet make on the outer zone the impression of blue ; and this blue is so much the paler, the nearer the impression on the polar zone is to green. It follows, then, that whereas there is at the central zone an indefinite number of color-tones possible, this number is re- duced to comparatively few impressions at the middle zone ; while all color-tones gradually become indistinguishable and are lost on passing through the outer zone. These great changes in sensi- tiveness to color are not accompanied by similar changes in sen- sitiveness to colorless light ; it even appears that regions of the retina distant about 30 from its centre are more sensitive to light than is the polar zone. A certain proportion of persons (perhaps one-twentieth or more) appear to have a defective structure of the retina, which may be described as corresponding in the polar zone to that of the normal retina in the middle or even the outer zone. Such persons are said to be " color-blind." The farther outward this imperfect condition of the retina extends, the nearer does the defect approach to total color-blindness. 2 In most cases of this defect there is a partial or complete insensitiveness to the red rays ; these rays are especially liable to be confused with the dark-green or the yellow. The spec- trum is thus shortened at the red end. Cases of so-called violet- blindness, as reported by Donders and Stilling, are much more rare and doubtful. In total color-blindness only shades of gray from 1 See von Kries, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1882 (Ap- pendix), p. 90. 2 See Fick, Zur Theorie d. Farbenblindheit, p. 213 f. ; and in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 206 f. 336 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. I white to black are visible. In general, the attempts to make out a spectrum for the color-blind are unsatisfactory, since we can only be sure as to what color-tones appear like or unlike to them ; we cannot, on the contrary, be sure that their abnormal sensations are like any of our normal sensations in other words, that what they see when red light falls on the retina corresponds to any of our color- tones. The three or four cases reported where one eye of a person has been normal and the other color-blind are, of course, especially valuable ; since they offer an opportunity to compare immediately the sensations of the normal with those of the pathological eye. These cases, according to von Kries ' show that the two funda- mental colors to which the color-blind are reduced may be con- sidered as either red and blue-green or greenish-yellow and blue- violet. 13. Important modifications of the normal action of the eye are also caused by the previous condition of the retina, or by the contem- poraneous condition of parts of it contiguous to those on which the light falls. The former fact explains the phenomena of " inertia " and " exhaustion ; " the latter, the phenomena of " contrast." The reaction of the sense of sight is relatively very sluggish ; or in other words the inertia of the eye is relatively great. This fact is undoubtedly due to the chemical nature of the stimulus which acts directly upon its end-organs. The light requires time in order to effect those photo-chemical changes on whose action upon the nervous elements of the retina our sensations of light and color depend. On the other hand, if we close the eyes after looking intently upon any bright object, the image of this object remains for some time, and only slowly fades out of sight. Such an image is called a "positive after-image," because its bright and dark lines and surfaces correspond to those of the original object. The delay which the sensations undergo, both in forming and in fading away, is said to be due to the inertia of the retinal structure. It is, of course, a law of all nervous excitation and action that it requires a certain amount of time for beginning and for changing its char- acter. White positive after-images (as Fechner, Helmholtz, and oth- ers have shown) pass quickly through greenish-blue to indigo- blue and then to violet or rose-color. But " negative after-images " are due to the exhaustion of the retina. If the eye be intently fixed for some time on a small square of black lying upon a sheet of white paper, and then suddenly turned upon the white surface, a bright square appears, moves about with the eye, and slowly 1 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1882 (Appendix), p. 152 f. PHENOMENA OF CONTRAST. 337 fades away. If we look for a long time at a green surface and then direct the eye upon a white one, the latter appears for a moment to be of a red color. In general, the color of the negative after-image is such that, when combined with the color of the object, the two will produce white. In other words, the color of such an image is u com- plementary " of the color of the object. Such facts as the foregoing must in some manner be brought under the law which applies to all the elements of the nervous system, but especially to the end-organs and the central organs ; these organs become wearied by continuous use, and require time for recovery of their suspended or diminished functions. Precisely how the application is to be made to the case of the retina is, however, a matter of the general physiological the- ory of vision which cannot as yet be stated with perfect certainty. The phenomena of exhaustion are among the most important for the formation of such a theory. Investigations in this direction have led to the discovery that none even of the spectral colors are perfectly saturated, since each of them can be made to appear more so by looking at it with an eye wearied by the complementary color. l Ked is most nearly saturated, blue and yellow next, and green least of all. 14. The different parts of the retina are interdependent in the production of sensation ; or to employ the statement of Wundt 2 " The sensation which arises through the stimulation of any given point of the retina is also a function of the state of other immedi- ately contiguous points." Hence arise, in part at least, the phe- nomena of contrast, which are of two kinds contrast of bright- ness and contrast of color- tone. The fundamental fact in the first class of contrasts is this : every bright object appears brighter with surroundings darker than itself, and darker with surroundings brighter than itself. These phenomena are explained by Helm- holtz 3 as deceptions of judgment, such as we are accustomed to in our estimates of distances. To this explanation, however, Fick/ Bering, 6 and others oppose strong and apparently conclusive ob- jections. They would explain the same phenomena by the modify- ing influence of the excitation of one part of the retina upon the excitation of contiguous parts. Such influence does not always 1 Comp. Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, p. 279 f. ; Exner, in Pfluger's Archiv, i., p. 389; and see, especially, von Kries, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Phy- siolog. Abth. , 1882 (Appendix), p. 115. * Physiolog. Psychologic, i., p. 439. 3 Physiolog. Optik, pp. 388 ff. 4 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 231 f. 5 Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., June, 1872, and December, 1873. 22 338 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. take the form of depressing the excitability of the contiguous parts ; on the contrary, stimulating certain elements for some time may finally involve contiguous ones in a secondary way. This fact they consider to be the true explanation of the spreading of a bright object on a dark background, whose after-image becomes a clear band of light around the dark image of the bright object. When colored instead of white light is used in experimenting under the law of contrast, phenomena similar to those of complementary colors are obtained. 1 A small square of white on a surface of green, when covered with a transparent sheet of tissue-paper, appears as red on a surrounding surface of a whitish hue ; on a red ground it appears as green, on a blue ground as yellow, and vice versa. There is the same dispute over these as over the other phenomena of contrast. Shall they be considered as cases of deception of judg- ment, or do they admit of a physiological explanation ? Mere cases of deception they cannot well be. The theory which ascribes to each part of the retina an influence upon other contiguous parts is the most satisfactory form of a physiological explanation. But guch physiological explanation seems to need supplementing by reference to induced conditions of the central organs, concerning the nature of which we are thus far almost entirely ignorant. 15. It will readily be seen that a theory which shall satisfac- torily account for the complicated phenomena of visual sensations is difficult to establish. Physiological optics will probably never be able to explain in detail the individual sensations of light and color. But each claimant to present such theory must, as Wundt 2 maintains, account for the following four main classes of facts : (1) The subjective relations of the color-tones, and the fact that they may all be graded downward, as it were, into colorless light ; (2) the law of the mixing of all the colors from three (or more) funda- mental color-tones ; (3) the phenomena of after-images ; and (4) the phenomena of contrast. Among all the hypotheses hitherto proposed to account for the quality of visual sensations, that brought forward by Young, and elaborated and applied by Helmholtz, is by far the most prominent. This hypothesis takes its point of start- ing from the undoubted fact that, by admixture of a few so-called fundamental color-tones, we can produce all the other colors, as well as the sensation called "white." There are said to be three such color-tones, because this is the smallest number which will account for the facts. Of these three, green must be one, since, in the spectrum of colors, this tone has no complementary color. Green ' See Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, pp. 388 ff. 2 Physiolog. Psychologie, i., p. 450. THE YOUNG-HELMHOLTZ THEOEY. 339 being fixed, the other two color-tones must be chosen from near the ends of the spectrum, and in such a way that, when combined with spectral green, they will produce white. Red (carmine-red, ac- cording to Fick) and either violet (so Young and Helmholtz) or blue (indigo-blue, Fick) best fulfil the required conditions. It is, then, assumed, by the Young-Helmholtz theory, that in every portion of the retina which is susceptible to color there exist three kinds of nervous elements, the excitation of which separately would pro- duce three distinct kinds of sensations ; and that each kind of ele- ment is capable of producing only that kind of sensation which is peculiar to itself. It apparently follows that each of these three kinds of nervous elements has its special form of end-apparatus, the excitability of which differs from that of the others ; that is to say, G H PIG. 92. Diagram from Fick, illustrating the Young-Helmholtz Theory. (For explanation, see the text.) there are fibres of red color-sensation, whose end-apparatus responds specifically to rays of small refrangibility ; fibres of green color- sensation, whose end-apparatus responds to rays of medium re- frangibility ; and fibres of violet or blue color-sensations, whose end-apparatus responds to rays of great refrangibility. We must suppose, however, since we cannot directly analyze into their com- ponents the sensations which appear in consciousness, that no one of the three kinds of elements is ordinarily excited alone. Every actual sensation of color is therefore a complex affair, whose char- acter is determined by the relations in which each one of the three intensities of excitation stands to both the others. In explanation of this assumption the following diagram is proposed. 1 (See Fig. 92.) The curved lines R, G, and B represent the three kinds of 1 Taken from Fick's Physiolog. Optik, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 198; cornp. Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, p. 291. 340 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. nerves sensitive to the three fundamental color-tones E to red, G to green, B to blue (indigo). The curves described by them show the strength of the excitation exercised by the stimulus, corresponding to the colors of the spectrum, upon each kind of nerves. The per- pendicular lines indicate the colors of the spectrum ; and the way these lines cut the curves shows the relative strength of the excita- tion of each kind of nerves which is combined to produce these colors. It should be gratefully acknowledged that the Young-Helmholtz theory affords a brilliant explanation of a great many of the phe- nomena of sensations of light and color. It is most successful with those that relate to the mixing of colors and to complementary color. The hypothesis cannot be said, however, to be wholly ade- quate and satisfactory. One of its most intelligent advocates (Fick) admits that it cannot explain the following cardinal fact : Every ray of light which, so long as it is confined to a moderate extent of the polar zone, makes the impression of a saturated color produces a whitish impression, almost devoid of color-tone, as soon as it is limited to an extremely minute portion of the retina. This is the very opposite of what the hypothesis would lead us to expect ; for, according to it, extremely minute impressions on the retina ought to isolate the particular kind of fibres, and so yield the purest possible color-tone. The facts of histology seem rather adverse than favorable to the theory, although not much stress can be laid upon them alone. Moreover, it does not satisfactorily explain the facts of contrast of colors and of color-blindness. The most re- cent investigations seem to indicate that cases of color-blindness cannot be accounted for by dropping out one fundamental kind of nerve-fibres, as the Young-Helmholtz theory supposes. 1 Various other important objections are raised by its opponents (especially by Bering, Wundt, and others). 16. In order to supply the alleged defects of the Young-Helm- holtz theory of color- sensations, several other theories have been devised notably those of Bering and of Wundt. The former 3 differs from most other investigators in his view of the nature of the changes of sensation which take place as we, in experience, run through all the different shades of gray from white to black. All such changes Hering considers analogous to those alterations in the quality of our sensations that would be produced by passing 1 See von Kries, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1882 (Ap- pendix), pp. 134-153. 5 E. Hering, Zur Lehre vom Lichtsinne, Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., 6 papers, 1872-74. WUTSDT'S THEORY OF COLORS. 341 the eye over a surface on which the different color-tones almost insensibly shaded into each other. Hering, therefore, proposes six (or three pairs instead of three single ones) fundamental color- tones namely, black and white, green and red, blue and yellow. The changes which give rise to sensations of black, green, and blue are ascribed to the process of " construction " of a so-called visual substance ; those which give rise to white, red, and yellow are as- scribed to the " destruction " of such visual substance. The three pairs of color-tones are thus made antagonistic rather than com- plementary. But the hypothesis of Hering appears to involve more uncertain assumptions, and to explain fewer facts, than the one it would displace. Moreover, the assumption that white, and its shades down to black, may be considered as color-tones, instead of altera- tions in the brightness of the true color-tones, is generally denied. The theory of Wundt l emphasizes the difference in processes rather than in the kinds of retinal elements. It involves the fol- lowing principles : (1) In every excitation of the retina two dif- ferent processes are set up, the variations of which follow differ- ent laws ; one of these is a " chromatic " process (which gives us color-tones), and is a function of the length of the waves of light ; the other is " achromatic," and is also dependent upon the wave- lengths, but varies only in intensity and remains in character the same. (2) The achromatic excitation consists in a " uniform pho- to-chemical process," which reaches its maximum at yellow and falls off toward both ends of the spectrum. (3) The chromatic excitation is a "polyform photo-chemical process," which changes continuously with the wave-lengths of light. The extreme differ- ences of this length are such as to produce effects that approximate each other ; while the effects of certain different intervening wave- lengths are related in such a way that opposed phases of one and the same movement equalize each other perfectly. (4) Every pro- cess of excitation of the retina outlasts .the stimulation for a certain time, and exhausts the sensibility of the nerve-substance for that particular form of stimulation. The positive after-images are to be explained by the persistence of the retinal excitation, the negative by exhaustion. (5) The difficult phenomena of contrast are to be explained by the general principle that all impressions of light and color are experienced in relation to each other. In other words, they fall under the general law of relativity. 17. Von Kries 2 has subjected all the principal theories of color- 1 See Physiolog. Psychologic, i., pp, 450 ff. 2 See Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abtli., 1882, Appendix, pp. 1-178. 342 SENSATIONS OF SIGHT. sensations to a most searching criticism as considered in the light of all the facts. He naturally finds serious defects in them all, but arrives at the following highly important conclusions. The photo- chemical facts concerned in vision compel us to adopt a theory of component elements rather than one of changes qualitatively alike and arranged in a continuous series. This would seem decisive against the theory of Wundt. Only by the aid of assuming the varied combination of such elements can we explain the phenomena G FIG. 93. Color-Triangle, from Fick. (For explanation see text.) of exhaustion. Three series of components are apparently requisite : one for the bright and dark, but colorless, sensations, and two color-tone series a red-green series, and a yellow-blue series. White is, nevertheless, not to be considered as belonging to the three, since it corresponds to all the color-tones whenever they reach a minimum of saturation. The processes corresponding to these three series of components may be located at different places in the nervous apparatus of vision either more centrally or more SYMBOLISM OF COLOR-TONES. 343 peripherally. The articulation and adjustment, as it were, of the three processes von Kries would assign to the central organs. And here we reach the extreme limits, not only of our assured knowl- edge, but also of our power to frame a plausible theory ; for it ap- pears that all theories must either leave certain important facts un- explained, or else make further assumptions concerning nervous processes especially in the central organs of vision of the exist- ence and influence of which upon the sensations there can be no doubt, but of the precise nature of which we are completely ig- norant. 18. Much ingenuity and painstaking have been expended in de- vising some form of symbolism which should represent to the eye in geometrical relations the laws of the sensations of light and color. Obviously the sensations of this sense cannot, like those of hearing, be symbolized by the relations of points along a straight line. Color-tones, unlike musical tones, form a series of qualitatively differ- ent sensations that, at certain places in the scale, separate from each other with varying degrees of rapidity, and then toward the broken ends, as it were, of this scale, tend to approach each other again. Such relations are most successfully set forth by a triangle, which may be constructed as in the foregoing figure ' (93). In this triangle the different color-tones may be regarded as lying together along the curved line, from red to violet, and the difference in any two color-tones as measured by the angle which two lines make when drawn from the point W through the points occupied on the curve by the two color-tones. For example, the difference between red and violet is less than that between red and green, as is indicated by the fact that the angle R WHis smaller than the an- gle R W G. By Fig. 94 2 the relations of the color-tones as contrasting with, and complementary of, each other are rep- resented. Of the two Concentric FIG. 94. Scheme for showing the Rela- circles, each color in one corresponds tions of Color - tone ( see text )- to the complementary color of the other. If the color inducing the contrast is represented by a segment of the inner circle, the coincident segments of the two circles represent the direction in which the induced change is moving, as it were. For example, 1 Taken from Fick, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 184. 3 Taken from Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, i., p. 442. 344 SENSATIONS OF THE SKIN. since the segment green coincides with purple, and red coincides with blue-green, green on a red ground is modified as it would be if blue-green were mixed with it ; and red, as it would be if purple were mixed with it. 19. At least two specifically different forms of sensation namely, Pressure and Temperature have generally been admitted to have their organ in the skin. ' The claims of various other kindred forms of feeling to be considered as primitive factors of our sense-percep- tions, arising from the activity of the skin as an end-organ of sense, are more doubtful. Sensations of motion, of innervation and weari- ness of the muscles, the so-called " common sensations " (or sensa- tions of the sensus communis), the sensations of pain or pleasure, and those delicate shadings of sensation, as it were, which constitute the " local coloring" of all the feelings to which we assign a definite place in the fields of sight and touch, are all closely allied to sensa- tions of pressure and temperature. But some of these forms of feeling as, for example, the so-called sensations of motion and of the sensus communis are undoubtedly complex modifications of certain simpler states of consciousness ; others of them, as the sensations. of muscular weariness, of pain, of innervation, and " local coloring," may possibly have, in part, a central origin. As a rule, they lack the characteristic quality of being components of the " presenta- tions of sense," as this quality belongs to all genuine sensations. Sensations of " local coloring " have, indeed, a most important part to take in the formation of the " presentations of sense ; " but they are, in the realm of touch and of muscular feeling, as infinitely and delicately varied (and even more difficult of description) as are the finest shadings of musical tones or color-tones. 20. A sixth sense, however, and a sixth organ of sensations must doubtless be recognized as constituted by the muscles and the various kinds of feeling which their action occasions. These muscular sensations, when combined with those of the skin, give certain complex feelings of motion on which the adjustment of the body to its environment is so dependent. The long-continued dis- pute concerning the presence of sensory nerve-fibrils in the muscles may be said to be settled affirmatively. 2 Certain subjective phe- nomena cannot be accounted for by ascribing the so-called muscular sensations to feelings of central innervation, or by identifying them 1 On the physiology of the skin, see Goldscheider, art. Neue Thatsachen liber die Hautsinnesnerven, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., Supplement-Band, pp. 1-104. * See, especially, Sachs, in Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1874, pp. 175 1, 491 f., and 645 f. THE FEELING OF PRESSURE. 345 with the sensations of pressure through the skin. 1 Bernhardt 2 found that the degree of sensitiveness to different weights, when lifted by the foot or the finger, was little or not at all diminished by exclud- ing all central innervation of the muscles through an act of will. The discrimination of differences of weight was riot greatly impaired when the limb was bent by an induction-shock sent through the muscles instead of by motor impulses arising in the brain. The muscular sensations cannot, therefore, be due to such central activ- ity. Investigation also shows that the muscular sensations sup- plement those of pressure in the skin in all our estimates of the position and motion of the limbs ; these two are, therefore, not identical. Moreover, without assuming the existence and aid of such sensations we cannot account for that nice control of the mus- cles which, especially in the case of the eye, is so indispensable a prerequisite, not only for adjusting their action to the ends desired, but also for gaining an exact knowledge of the position and motion of objects in the outside world. The precise manner, however, in which the muscular sensations originate, through that stimulation of the sensory nerves which the contraction of the muscular fibre occasions, is as yet unknown. Nor can they easily be separated and classified into kinds, apart from the sensations of pressure with which they are in actual experience constantly allied. Their chief interest to psychology centres in the help which they furnish to the mind in forming its " presentations of sense." 21. Sensations of Pressure are dependent upon the excitation of the sensory nerves of the skin through their appropriate end- organs. The excitation of the trunk of any of these nerves at some point along its course may produce the feeling of pain, but does not produce those definite sensations of pressure which we are able to localize so accurately and discriminate so nicely as to their degree. Precisely which of these end-organs are specifically related to sen- sations of pressure neither histology nor experimental physiology has thus far been able to determine (see Part I., chap. V., 10). The ordinary stimulus of the end-organs of the skin active in these sensations consists in their compression or expansion by contact with some external object which either rests upon them or upon which they rest, or which is moved over or against them, or over or against which they are moved. Such stimulus may, of course, vary both in form and in degree. The quantity and succession of the sensations of pressure, as well as the manner in which they com- bine with one another and with sensations of the muscular sense, 1 Comp. Funke, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 359 f. 2 Archiv f. Psychiatrie, III., p. 627. 346 SENSATIONS OF THE SKIN. have a marked effect in determining their characteristic "tone" of feeling. In respect to quality pure and simple, sensations of pressure scarcely admit of a scientific classification. We localize them in the field of touch ; we make an important use of them in connection with sensations of muscular origin, for constructing the field of vision and for giving to different objects their respective places in this field ; but in ordinary experience we do not directly recognize kinds of the simple sensations of pressure as we do of tastes, smells, tones, and colors. A distinction is sometimes made between "light touch," or touch proper, and sensations of press- ure or weight. But the distinction, so far as it leaves out of ac- count the muscular sensations, has hitherto been one only of de- gree and not of kind. The more recent and thorough investigations of Goldscheider l have led him to distinguish two specifically different sensations which enter into what is ordinarily called the feeling of pressure. This distinction is based upon facts experimentally ascertained. If a very fine point of metal, wood, or cork, be touched lightly to the skin, it will be found to awaken a definite sensation, such as is en- titled to be called a "sensation of pressure," only at certain minute spots in any given area of the skin. This sensation, when the pressure is very light, is described as lively and delicate, often accompanied by the feeling of being tickled. On increasing the pressure upon these same spots the sensations change their char- acter somewhat, and become as though some small, hard kernel were pressed upon the skin (" Korniges Gefilhl "). Between these distinctively "pressure-spots" it is not possible to excite by press- ure the same characteristic sensation. Stimulation of the inter- mediate spots, on the contrary, produces a dull, indefinable, "con- tent-less " sensation ; and when the pressure is increased, a sense of being pricked or stuck. Both of these kinds of sensation, when the pressure is still further increased, pass over into painful feeling ; but the character of the pain in the two is different. The arrangement of the " pressure-spots " is analogous to that of the temperature-spots (to be described subsequently). They occur much more frequently in certain areas of the body than in others. They are placed in chains, as it were, sometimes more and some- times less thickly set. These chains ordinarily radiate from a kind of central point, and run in such directions as to form either circu- lar, longitudinal, or pyramidal figures. Their direction is seldom identical with that of the temperature-spots. In the opinion of 1 Archiv f. Anat, u, Physiol., 1885, Physiolog. Abth., Supplement-Band, pp. 76 ff. ARRANGEMENT OF PRESSUKE-SPOTS. 347 Goldscheider the spots of both kinds correspond to the terminal points of the nerve-fibres of two specifically different kinds of nerves distributed over the skin. But whereas all the area of the skin is well covered with such nerves as give us the general dull and in- definite feeling of contact, the nerves of the sensation of pressure are much more unevenly distributed. It need scarcely be said that, other things being equal, they are most numerous in the areas of the skin most sensitive to touch. The different pressure-spots themselves differ in sensitiveness ; some are much more easily ex- cited than others. The sensations themselves come under the FIG. 95. Arrangement of Pressure- spots (Qoldscheider). A, dorsal and radial surface of the first phalanx of the index finger ; B, membrane between thumb and index finger ; C, dorsal surface of forearm ; D, back ; E, inner surface of forearm ; F, back of hand. general laws of exhaustion, practice, etc., as these laws apply to the whole mechanism of sense. The attempt has been made, on the other hand, to identify, in kind, sensations of pressure (especially those of light touch) and sensations of temperature. 1 E. H. Weber observed that cold bodies resting on the skin appear heavier, and warm lighter, than they really are. A single silver dollar of the temperature of 25-19.5 Fahr. appeared to be of the same weight as two dollars of the tem- perature of 98.5-100.5 Fahr. Wunderli also argues the identity of these two classes of sensations on the ground that, if certain parts of the skin are lightly touched with cotton or slightly warmed by approaching a heated surface to them, through a square opening in 1 For a discussion of this question, see Funke, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., HI., ii., p. 820 f. 348 SENSATIONS OF THE SKIN. a piece of paper laid upon the skin, the two sensations thus occa- sioned are frequently mistaken for each other. But Szabadfoldi has much weakened the force of Weber's experiment by showing that small wooden disks when heated to 122 Fahr. often feel heavier than those which are really larger but are not thus warmed. And Wunderli's observation at best holds good only for compara- tively obtuse parts of the skin, especially the back. Moreover, if the same stimuli should serve to excite both the pressure-spots and the temperature-spots, this would not prove the identity of the two sensations. Finally, the physiology of the sense of temperature re-enforces the indubitable testimony of consciousness, and leads us to the con- clusion that from beginning to end in the character of their stimuli, of their nervous processes, and of the resulting modifications of feeling the sensations of pressure and the sensations of tempera- ture are qualitatively distinct. They have in common only the organ in which their apparatus is located, and the fact that both kinds of sensations are constantly associated most intimately in time and space. 22. Sensations of Temperature, therefore, form a second dis- tinct species which have their origin in the excitation of the nervous end-apparatus of the skin. Whether their end-apparatus is locally the same as that upon the excitation of which the sensations of pressure are dependent, it has seemed until very lately impossible to say. But recent investigations (especially of Blix, 1 Goldscheider, 2 and Donaldson 3 ) point unequivocally to the conclusion that certain definite spots of the skin, and these only, are susceptible to irrita- tions of a kind to result in sensations of temperature. Such spots are insensible to pain (even the pain of temperature), and a needle can be run into them without being felt ; they are probably also in- sensible to pressure. What is more remarkable still, the existence of " heat-spots " and " cold-spots " or minute localities of the skin sensitive to heat but not to cold, and conversely seems demon- strable. By using a machine which locates the stimulus micro- metrically, the topography of the skin may be mapped out, and extremely minute spots indicated which respond to irritation with sensations of pain, of pressure, of cold, and of heat respectively. These different kinds of sensation-spots appear never to be super- 1 Zeitschrift f. Biol., 1884, XX., pp. 141 ff. 2 Monatshefte f. prakt. Dermatol., 1884, III., Nos. 7, 9, 10 ; 1885, IV., No. 1 ; and art. in Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1885, Physiolog. Abth., Supplement- Band. 3 Research on the Temperature-sense, reprinted from Mind, No. XXXIX. ARRANGEMENT OF TEMPERATURE-SPOTS. 349 imposed. They are not located alike on the symmetrical parts of the same individual, or on the corresponding parts of different in- dividuals. An accurate mapping out of the different areas of the skin, with respect to their temperature-spots, is difficult ; since ex- periment soon blunts the sense, and even the approach of a heated or cooled point raises or lowers the temperature over a considerable area. But, in general, such spots occur in lines that radiate from centres generally coincident with the roots of the hairs, in those FIG. 96. Arrangement of Temperature-spots. A, heat-spots ; and B, cold- spots from the palm of the left hand (Goldscheider). regions of the skin where such appendages are found. These lines often run so as to cross each other, forming figures of various shapes, triangles with rounded corners, etc. Heat-spots are, on the whole, less abundant than cold-spots ; but in parts of the body where the skin is most sensitive to either heat or cold the corresponding class of spots is relatively frequent. Temperature-spots may be divided into first-class and second-class (so Goldscheider) according to the strength with which they react on moderate stimulation. Some spots are roused only by excessive temperatures. The same object feels cool to one spot, ice-cold to another. The electrical current when applied to these spots is thought to call out the corresponding specific sensations. Goldscheider con- siders that he has succeeded in exciting definite temperature-sensa- tions by applying electricity to the trunks of the nerves distributed to certain areas of the skin. This would appear to be almost a demonstration that the nerves of this sense are specific, and of two kinds nerves of heat-sensation and nerves of cold-sensation. Puncturing a temperature-spot also gives rise to temperature-sen- sations. The discriminative sensibility of the temperature-spots is found to be much finer than that of the tactile sensations. Everything which produces a change in the temperature of the skin acts, of course, as a stimulus for the sensations of heat and cold. 23. The above-mentioned discoveries as to the specific energy of the nerves and end-apparatus of the skin, interesting as they are, 350 SENSATIONS OF THE SKIN. have not yet been completely brought into rational connection with our experience of temperature-sensations and our knowledge of the general laws of nervous action. It is obvious, however, that the principles of contrast, of relativity, and of exhaustion, must bear a large part in the explanation of all these sensations. Sen- sations of temperature have apparently a certain dependence on the temperature of the thermic apparatus itself. This law has been elaborated and defended in detail by Hering, 1 in the following form : " As often as the thermic apparatus at any spot in the skin has a temperature which lies above its own zero-point we have a sensation of heat ; in the contrary case, a sensation of cold. Either sensation is so much the more marked, or stronger, the more the temperature of the thermic apparatus at the time varies from the temperature of its own zero-point." By the "zero-point'* of any part of the skin is meant the exact objective temperature which at that part will produce no sensation of either heat or cold. Such zero-point is, of course, different for different parts of the body, according as they are or are not exposed, and are or are not well supplied with arterial blood, etc. It also changes in connection with changes in the temperature of the surrounding air or of the bodies with which the skin is in contact. By this principle a great number of our ordinary sensations of temperature are explained by Hering. The finger and the nose are colder than the inside of the mouth, because they are exposed to radiation of their heat. On passing from a room of a given temperature into one of either higher or lower temperature we experience at first certain sensa- tions of temperature while the zero-point of the thermic apparatus is becoming adjusted to its new surroundings. After such adjust- ment has taken place these sensations may cease to be renewed in the reverse direction, however, on a return to the former sur- roundings. This adjustment has its limits ; it is dependent chiefly upon the evaporation of the skin and upon the circulation of the blood. If the surroundings are more than so hot or so cold, they may excite constant sensations of temperature. Among the induce- ments to sensations of heat at any locality of the skin, Hering men- tions the following as prominent in our ordinary experience : All checking of the radiation of heat, while the blood-supply remains unaltered ; all contact with a medium or object of higher tem- perature and this according to the ease with which such medium or object parts with its heat ; and all increase of heat in the skin 1 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 419 f. ; and Sitzgsber. d. Wie- ner Acad., LXXV., Abth. 3, p. 101 f. DETERMINATION OF THE ZERO-POINT. 351 coming from the interior of the body, as in the sudden hypersemia which takes place in blushing. Inducements to sensations of cold are as follows : Increased convection of the heat of the skin by the surrounding medium, while the blood-supply remains unchanged (as when the wind blows over the hand or face, especially if the skin be moist) ; contact with objects which have the same (or even slightly higher) objective temperature as the surrounding air, but convey the- heat from the skin more rapidly than it ; contact with or proximity to objects colder than the skin ; lessening of the interior warmth of the body for example, by contraction of the blood-vessels which supply a given portion of the skin. Ordinary experience makes us familiar with many of the phenomena which come under all these cases. The determination of the exact zero-point of different parts of the body is a matter of great difficulty. The rise and fall of the tem- perature of the thermic apparatus, in connection with that principle of exhaustion which applies to all the nervous mechanism, and es- pecially to certain of the end-organs of sense, doubtless account (at least partially) in some way for the well-known phenomena of contrast in temperature-sensations. Weber showed that if the hand be held for a minute in water of the temperature 54.5 Fahr., and then in water of 64.4 Fahr., a sensation of heat will be felt for a few seconds, although the latter would have felt cold to the hand if placed in it at first. Moreover, if we hold one hand in moderately cold water, and dip the other repeatedly in the same water, the sensation of cold is stronger in the latter, although the temperature of the hand held in the water is really lower. But, according to an experiment of Goldscheider's, if one hand be left for ten seconds in water of the temperature of 104 Fahr., and then both hands immersed in cold water, the warmed hand will feel the cold less distinctly than the other. This latter investigator, how- ever, is inclined to dissent from Hering's theory, and return to the theory of E. H. Weber. Weber held that the rising of the tem- perature of the skin is felt as heat, and its sinking as cold. After-images of temperature-sensations seem also to exist. But when a surface of the skin has been warmed or cooled, and the after-image has faded quite away, it is said that it can be called back by light mechanical irritation ; this is especially true of sen- sations of cold. The phenomena of exhaustion are noticed in sen- sations of temperature. Our perception of the absolute degree of temperature, and of minute variations in its degree, is most acute for places in the scale lying close to the normal temperature of the skin. It would seem, on the whole, as though the phenomena 352 SENSATIONS OF THE SKIN. of contrast of sensations of temperature, as well as of color, require for their satisfactory explanation a knowledge (possibly of the action of the central organs of the nervous system) which we do not yet possess. E. H. Weber also showed that the amount of the skin which is stimulated has a marked influence on the quality of the resulting sensation. The temperature of the same fluid does not feel pre- cisely the same to a single finger and to the entire hand. This experience is similar to that which has already been described in the case of sensations of color. It appears explicable in the case of the skin from what is now known about the existence of a cer- tain variable number of heat-spots and cold-spots. In the same way, in part, may we explain the fact that smooth objects, which therefore come into contact with a larger portion of the skin like leather, paper, wood, glass, and porcelain appear colder to the whole hand even when they have the same objective temperature with it. 24. Nothing whatever is known as to the exact manner in which changes of temperature act upon the thermic apparatus to excite it ; the recent discoveries appear to make such action all the more difficult of conception and description. Since the terms "hot" and " cold " are in physics only relative, it is hard to see why ab- solutely different apparatus, with a distinct local position, should be used (as Goldscheider's discoveries indicate) for the sensations corresponding to each. Moreover, on Bering's hypothesis, how are we to account for the fact that heat-spots and cold-spots are in turn stimulated by the same objective temperature according to the rise and fall of the zero-point of the entire region of the skin ? Possibly it may be found that certain chemical or electrical changes, dependent upon the increase or decrease of that mode of molecular motion which physics calls " heat," are the proximate stimuli of the two classes of end-organs of the temperature-sense. Gold- scheider supposes that the difference in sensitiveness of different areas of the skin to temperature must be ascribed to the anatomi- cal distribution of the heat-sensitive and cold-sensitive fibres, re- spectively. But he does not show us what kind of nervous con- trivance would satisfy all the conditions which are imposed by the complicated facts of experience. A. Herzen ' considers himself to have demonstrated, by patho- logical cases and experiment upon animals, that sensory impulses of cold, like those of touch, pass along the posterior strands of the spinal cord ; and that the same region of the brain (Gyrus sigmoi- 1 See Pfluger's Archiv, 1885, pp. 93 ff. SPECIFIC ENERGY OF THE NERVES. 353 deus) is the " centre " for both. Sensitiveness to heat can be re- tained, it would seem, after sensitiveness to cold has been lost. 25. In closing the subject treated in the last two chapters, attention is again called to the large amount and cumulative char- acter of the evidence afforded by the special sensations, considered as respects their quality, for the law of the Specific Energy of the Nerves. It is impossible to account for the above-mentioned phe- nomena without carrying this law to a great length in its applica- tion to the special senses. We may not be able to affirm as does Fick, 1 for example that two sensations are distinguishable as re- spects quality only in case they are occasioned by two individually different elements of the nervous system. For we have seen that the quality of sensations depends upon their quantity, upon their relation to preceding and contemporaneous sensations, and upon considerations other than merely the one of what particular nerve- fibre or element of the end-apparatus was acted upon by the stim- ulus. Moreover, there is no warrant for saying that identically the same nervous apparatus cannot be excited variously according to the nature of the stimulus which acts upon it, or according to the combination with other parts of the system into which it enters for the time. It is obvious, however, that the differentiation of func- tion, and the assignment to specifically distinct apparatus of par- ticular nervous impressions corresponding to particular mental states, is carried to a great length in the special senses. In this differentiation of function it is not wholly or chiefly the nerve- fibres, as such, which should be taken into account ; it is also the minute subdivisions of the end-organs of sense, and the connections set up within the corresponding regions of the central organs. In accounting for those complex sensations which appear in ordinary consciousness, the law of permutations and combinations has, of course, to be considered.. A vast variety of such sensations maybe made up by changing the relations to each other of comparatively few simple elements. But in each of the senses our analysis, when carried to its utmost limit, leaves a number in some of the senses very large of simple sensations, which apparently must have their physical basis in the excitation of specifically distinct elements of the nervous mechanism. The sense of smell apparently requires that the law of the specific energy of the nerves should be carried to such a length as almost to reduce it to an absurdity. Histology has discovered only one essential kind of olfactory end-organ, and that of comparatively simple structure ; and yet experience gives, as the result of its ex- 1 In Hermann's Handb d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 166. 354 SENSATIONS OF THE SKIN. citation, a bewildering variety of sensations so specifically different as to baffle all our attempts to classify them. From the case of this sense an argument may then be derived which leads in ei- ther direction. It may be objected to the law that it is absurd to suppose a complexity of the end-organs of smell such as to corre- spond to each specific kind of olfactory stimulus with a specific sen- sation for example, the smell of musk, or of sulphuretted hydro- gen. It may be replied to the objection that, in the case of the ear, there are at least 16,000 or 20,000 distinct forms of auditory end-apparatus corresponding to the different musical tones ; and it is therefore by no means impossible that the entire regio ol- factoria may contain enough specifically different forms of its own peculiar end-apparatus to suffice for all the simple sensations of smell. The sense of taste does not occasion so many difficulties in rela- tion to the law of the specific energy of the nerves. It is thought possible by most physiologists to reduce all the sensations of taste to four, or at most six, different species. It is easy to suppose as many specifically different forms of the nervous apparatus cor- responding to the different classes of sensations sweet and sour, salt and bitter, alkaline and metallic. In -spite of the fact that such a classification appears satisfactory to most authorities, experi- ence is reluctant to confirm it. Many of the complex tastes, even when separated from their accompanying sensations of smell, are scarcely resolvable into combinations of the above-mentioned simple tastes. Into which of the six, for example, would experi- ment resolve the gustatory sensations which come from chewing a bit of chocolate, or of a nut from a black-walnut tree ? The strongest defence of the most extreme form of the theory of the specific energy of the nerves has hitherto been found in sensa- tions of musical sound. Here we undoubtedly have a wide range of qualitatively distinct states of consciousness which are ap- parently dependent upon the excitation of a correspondingly large number of distinct nervous elements. From sensations of sight, although many points of the prevalent theory are still obscure and unsatisfactory, a considerable force of evidence bearing in the same direction may be obtained. It seems almost certain that the numerous states of consciousness which result from stimulating the different nervous elements of the retina are due to combina- tions of a comparatively few kinds of such elements, each of which responds in a specific way to a special order of stimulus. Yet this is not precisely what the theory of specific energy seems to de- mand. For the different color-sensations all appear as simple and SPECIFIC ENERGY OF THE NERVES. 355 unannlyzable states of consciousness. None of them are twofold, as sensations. We are at a loss to say why, according to the theory of specific energy, each sensation should not result from the ex- citation of one, and only one, kind of nervous elements. The recent discoveries as to the existence of pressure-spots, heat-spots, and cold-spots in the skin add important evidence to that already existing in favor of the law under discussion. It will further appear, when we consider the process of localization in the so-called " geometrical senses " of the eye and the skin, that the very possibility of such a process demands a strict and far-reaching application of the law of the specific energy of the nerves. Pre- cisely how we are to state and limit this law, neither its opponents nor its advocates have as yet been able satisfactorily to show. The exact expression of the theory waits for further evidence from experiment, although there can be little doubt that in its main features it is already secure. CHAPTER V. THE QUANTITY OF SENSATIONS. 1. BY an act of mental analysis, which all men readily perform, changes in the amount of sensation are distinguished from changes in its quality. This distinction obviously requires for its perform- ance nothing beyond what is immediately given in consciousness. All sensations appear there as differing among themselves, not only with respect to the nature of the impression which serves to classify them into groups (as sensations of sight, sound, etc.), but also with respect to the degree in which each, particular impression possesses the sphere of conscious attention and feeling. The best illustra- tion of an alteration in the intensity of sensation, while its charac- teristic quality remains unaltered, may be derived from musical tones. The dying-out of a single note when the bow is drawn with decreasing force across the string of a violin, or a single key of the piano is struck and the pedal held, may be considered as a change in the quantity of sensation, while its quality is un- changed. A more complex case is the experience we have when approaching to, or receding from, a bell that is sounding or a steam-whistle that is blowing. Noises of a certain complex quality such as slamming, hissing, grating, etc. are continually de- scribed as very loud, moderately loud, or of weak intensity. So, too, when approaching a white or colored light, with our attention fixed upon it, we generally disregard almost wholly the changes in its color-tone which take place, and consider chiefly the changes in its intensity and apparent size. The pressure of different weights upon different parts of our skin is ordinarily regarded as the same in quality and as varying only in amount and locality. The same thing is true, in almost precisely the same way, with sensations of temperature. The thing we touch is called slightly cold or very cold, somewhat warm or hot, our attention being directed chiefly to the quantum of sensation which it calls forth. In other words, it is generally the same kind of pressure and tem- perature, with a varying degree of intensity, of which we are conscious. QUANTITY AND QUALITY. 357 It is more difficult, however, even in the most indefinite way, to separate the quantities of our sensations of smell and taste from the changes in quality of the same sensations. A concentrated sweet or acid so strongly excites a variety of forms of feeling which mingle indistinguishably with the specific sensations of taste that we are compelled to attend to the very decided qualitative changes which are taking place. The increased intensity of the sweet or sour we may indeed speak of as "very" much of the same sensa- tion which was excited in less degree by the diluted form of the stimulus ; but we are more likely to regard it as constituting a complete change in the kind of taste. In the same manner, atten- tion is forcibly directed toward the kind of sensation which results from increasing the quantity of any specific sensation of smell. It is further obvious that the distinction which we make between changes in the quantity and changes in the quality of our sensa- tions is to some extent applicable for comparing the sensations of different senses. And here the distinction, when applied to sub- species under certain specific forms of sensation, affords us a means of transition for such comparisons. Some yellows are bright and others dull ; and the same thing is true of the reds and the blues. The sours, the sweets, the bitters, may be compared with each other as respects the degree of intensity which they pos- sess. We may next, in a very indefinite way, compare the quantities of the sensations of the different senses as they appear side by side, or successively, in consciousness. We are ordinarily satisfied, however, with simply describing the varying degrees of intensity possessed by our different sensations as " weak " or " strong " (with or without the emphatic " very "), or as only " moderate." Thus we may judge that both the light which we see and the tone which we hear (either simultaneously or one immediately after the other) are, or are not, to be classed together under the same one of these three grades of intensity. 2. That changes in the intensity of our sensations are not, in fact, independent of changes in their specific nature has already been proved (Chap. IV., 4). Only in the case of musical tones are. we able at the same time to attend carefully to both the quan- tity and quality of our sensations, and so discover with perfect confidence that the former is changing while the latter remains un- changed. Even in this case, since the tones which we ordinarily hear are composite, any considerable alteration of their intensity changes also their tone-coloring, through the alteration which it produces in the comparative intensities of the overtones. Any in- crease in the brightness of a particular color invariably changes its 358 MEASUREMENT OF SENSATIONS. characteristic color-tone. A white of less intensity is not merely less white, but becomes a gray ; and by constantly diminishing its intensity white can be shaded through the different grays toward black, which is certainly not a feebler degree of the sensation of white. The same dependence of quality on quantity is true in all sensations of smell, taste, pressure, and temperature. It would be a mistake, however, on this account to consider " quantity " of sen- sations as only another name for shades of quality, or to deny that we can apply terms of measurement to these reactions of the mind upon the excitation of the nervous apparatus of sense. 1 Scientific analysis confirms the distinction made by ordinary experience be- tween "the way" we feel and "how much" we feel in any particular way. 3. All descriptions of the changing intensities of sensations, when made on the basis of ordinary experience solely, leave the subject in a very indefinite and unscientific form. That a certain noise is louder or weaker than another of precisely the same kind, one may be quite ready to affirm ; one may even be ready to say that one judges this noise to be about twice or three times as loud as the other. But when more precise estimates are demanded, one is obliged to hesitate before giving them. Is this musical tone ten (or a hundred) times as loud as the other ; or is it only nine and nine-tenths (or ninety-nine and nine-tenths) as loud ? Few would venture so nice an estimate with any confidence. Yet the case of sound is much more favorable than that of most of the senses for forming an exact judgment as to its intensity. It would be difficult under the most favorable circumstances to affirm that the sensa- tion of the light a is twice or three times as bright as that of the light b ; or that of the shadow x one-half or one-third as bright as y. The comparative intensities of different color-tones are yet more difficult to fix subjectively even in the most indefinite way. This particular yellow may seem about as bright a color, of its kind, as does the red near it, of its kind. But the precise moment could not readily be told when the blue of the sky appears exactly twice as intense as the green of the grass. Still further, all esti- mates of the quantity of sensation approach the point at which they lose their meaning and tend to become absurd, when we com- pare, for example, sensations of smell or taste with those of press- ure, temperature, or sight. We* never say : The rose smells as sweet as it looks red ; or the lemon is twice as sour as the sky is blue. And yet each qualitatively different sensation is assumed to have its place somewhere in that scale of intensities through which 1 Comp. Stumpf, Tonpsycliologie, I., p. 347 f. PROBLEMS OF QUANTITY. 359 the different qualities may run ; each may, therefore, be compared with every other, with respect to the general position which it oc- cupies in its characteristic scale. 4 All things to which terms of quantity apply admit of some kind of measurement and comparison with respect to their quantity. Sensations, to be sure, are not "things," but rather modes of the ac- tivity of mind, excited through the nervous mechanism of sense. Nevertheless, since, like material things, they admit of some appli- cation to themselves of the terms of quantity ; and since they vary in their absolute and relative degrees of quantity, it is not strange that experimental science has endeavored to measure sensations, and to state laws for their comparison and mutual relations. The general question of the quantity of sensation involves an answer to two subordinate inquiries. Of these two the first concerns the limits within which the different sensations may vary in quantity, and yet remain sensations of the same sense ; the second concerns the law of the relation which is maintained within the limits among the various sensations compared. But neither of these questions can be answered directly. Sensations cannot be kept constant in quantity, and measured by the direct application of physical stand- ards, whether with a view to fix their absolute or their relative magnitude. They are all, however, under ordinary circumstances, connected with the action of different forms of physical energy upon the nervous system ; that is to say, they are caused by the application of stimuli to the nerves, and the changes in the amount of the sensations are dependent upon changes in the intensity of the stimuli which occasion them. These stimuli admit of changes in quantity, which, theoretically at least, are measurable objectively, with more or less exactness. Resulting changes in consciousness can only be measured by attentive judgment, which directly dis- criminates the sensations as varying in intensity, and as being greater or less, one than the other, in the scale of impressions which experience has framed. The problems of the measurement of sensation may then be stated as follows : (1) To determine how little and how much of each kind of stimulus will produce respectively the least and the greatest quantity of each kind of sensation of which the mind is capable, or to find the quantitative limits within which sensations of each sense are possible ; and (2) to determine the law of the relation under which changes in the intensity of sensations, as estimated in consciousness, are dependent upon changes in the intensity of the stimuli. 5. Unexpected and insuperable difficulties, however, stand in 360 MEASUREMENT OF SENSATIONS. the way of a direct solution of either of the two above-mentioned problems, even in the modified form in which they were last stated. For, in the first place, it is only with respect to sensations of press- ure and of the muscular sense that we can measure objectively the physical energies which act on the nervous end-organs, with much approach to perfect exactness. 1 The amplitude of the acoustic waves in the air which originate from a given source would indeed admit of exact measurement ; but the modifications which these waves undergo before they reach the nerve-cells and nerve-fibres of the inner ear are so complicated as to make it impossible to calculate accurately the amount of the physical stimulus which is directly applied to the end-organs of hearing. The photo-chemical and thermic effects of light may be measured objectively. But this light is not the direct physical stimulus for the fibres of the optic nerve, or even for the end-organs of the retina ; and we have no sufficient means for estimating the amount of those chemical changes in the visual -substances, or pigments of the eye, which are supposed to be the immediate excitants of the terminal apparatus of vision. The case is yet more hopeless with respect to the senses of taste and smell ; inasmuch as we do not even know what properties smell- able and tastable substances must possess in order to influence the nerves of those senses. The objective measurement of the stimulus for sensations of temperature also is made difficult by the fact that its amount is dependent upon the zero-point of the skin itself, since this point is different at different times and for different areas of the entire surface, and is always difficult of precise deter- mination. Moreover, could we measure with perfect exactness the intensity of the stimulus as it is applied directly to the appropriate end- organs of sense, our knowledge of the intensity of the necessary physical antecedents of the resulting sensations would be far enough from complete. How do the end-organs modify the quan- tities of the stimuli before they transmit their effect to the conduct- ing nerve-fibres? Precisely how much further modification do these quantities receive in transmission to the central organs, at the hands of the conducting nerve-tracts ? What are the laws which control the reception, diffusion, and modification of the different intensities of the transmitted nerve-commotions, within those parts of the nervous mechanism (the central organs), where they become the immediate occasions of the rise and change of sensations in the mind ? These are questions to which we are absolutely unable to give any satisfactory answer. 1 Comp. Wundt, Philosophische Studien, 1883, II., hefti., pp. 10 ff. LEAST OBSERVABLE DIFFERENCE. 361 6. But if an exact objective measurement of the physical stim- uli is intrinsically difficult, an exact subjective measurement of the sensations themselves is inherently impossible. Such subjective measurement can exist at all only in the form of a judgment which compares two or more sensations with a view to pronounce whether they are equal in intensity ; or, if unequal, which is the greater and which the less of the two. But we have seen that the ordinary estimate of the absolute strength of a sensation is able simply to assign to it an indefinite position in the scale of its kind. With certain exceptions, scientific analysis can do little to exclude the uncertainties of the ordinary estimate. These exceptions are all of the following kind : Where two sensations of the same quality are produced, either simultaneously on different corresponding areas of the same organ or successively (with the most favorable interval be- tween) upon the same area, by amounts of stimulation that are very nearly or precisely equal, the attentive mind can discriminate the minute differences, or exact equality, of the intensities of these two sensations, with a great degree of nicety. The problem of meas- uring the quantity of sensations depends, therefore, upon obtaining the least observable differences in intensity for each kind of sensa- tions, and for every point along the scale of degrees of intensity. But in this connection another occasion for doubt and debate arises. Is "the least observable difference" of two sensations it- self a constant quantity ? The affirmative answer to this question is assumed by Fechner 1 and all strenuous advocates of the law which he defends. It has even been argued that to hold another than the affirmative view involves a contradiction in terms. 2 What can be meant, it is asked, by a "least observable difference " in in- tensity between two sensations, unless it be that this difference is a constant unit for the measurement of those sensations of the same kind which lie near the same point in the scale ? If the dif- ference is more than just observable, then of course it is not the least observable ; if it is less, then it is not observable at all that is to say, there is no change in sensation. But to this argument the following reply is pertinent: The "least observable difference" is not itself a mental entity or a mental state, that can be measured and used as a unit for measuring the quantity of other mental states. For example, if the addition of n to the stimulus S is the smallest amount that will produce such a change in the mental state x as to cause it to pass over into x', which the mind recog- 1 Elemente d. Psychophysik (1860), i., p. 54 f. ; In Sachen d. Psychophysik (1877), p. 45 f. ; Revision d. Hauptpunkte d. Psychophysik (1882), p. 18 f. 2 Comp. the first edition of Wundt's Physiolog. Psychologic, p. 294. 362 MEASUEEMENT OF SENSATIONS. nizes as having a greater quantity of sensation than x, such fact is to be stated and accepted as a mere fact ; it does not follow, how- ever, that we may conclude that x' x A, and that this A is en- titled to a name (" least observable difference ") and a rank among the mind's experiences by way of sensation. There are no sensa- tions (whatever physical occasions of sensations may exist) except those that appear in consciousness ; ex hypothesi, there appear in consciousness only x and x', and no sensation whatever l}ing be- tween the two in intensity. We judge, indeed, that the intensity of x', now present in experience, is greater than was the intensity of x, now remembered as an image of past experience ; but A (or x' x) is a mere abstraction, a figment of the experimenter's brain, and not a real experience of the person with whom he is experimenting. Moreover, if A were capable in any case of being regarded as a unit of subjective measurement, it would by no means follow that its mental value is a constant. That n, or the amount of stimulus which must be added to $ in order to produce an observable change in the quantity of sensation, is not constant we know beyond doubt. For the different senses, for different individuals, for different de- grees of the absolute stimulus (i.e., value of S), for different con- ditions of the organs of sense, this amount n is constantly varying. The amount of A may also be held to vary, according to psycho- logical changes in the means and power of mental discrimination, such as we have no way of measuring objectively. For we must again insist upon the fact that the real quantity of a sensation is not the same thing as the estimated quantity of the same sensation. The " least observable difference " would not, therefore, necessarily be the same as the least real difference, between two sensations. 1 It is not the mind's custom to attend accurately to the changes in quantity of its sensations as such. Properly speaking, many con- siderable changes in our sensations, as we may judge by the guid- ance they give to the bodily motions and the mental train, do not appear in consciousness with a label of exact quantitative measure- ment, as it were, attached to them. It is therefore obvious, from the great difficulties which belong inseparably both to the objective measurement of the stimuli of sensation, and to the subjective measurement of the resulting sen- sations, that any law of their relation can have only an indefinite statement and a secondary value. 7. Two methods of determining the lower limit, or minimum of stimulus producing a sensation, are possible. In the use of one method, a weak stimulus, but somewhat above the amount needed 1 Comp. Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., p. 51 f. DETERMINING THE LIMIT. 363 to produce a sensation is applied ; its intensity is then diminished by minute gradations until the exact point is reached and noted at which it ceases to produce any sensation at all. In the use of the other method a stimulus too weak to produce any sensation is first applied ; its intensity is then very gradually increased until it begins to produce the smallest observable sensation. Both ways may be combined, and thus the " sensitiveness " of each organ of sense, and of each part of each organ, may be determined. Such sensitiveness increases, of course, in inverse ratio to the amount of stimulus necessary for producing any sensation at all, or for pro- ducing a sensation estimated as having a definite degree of energy. The effort to determine the lower limit of sensations of sight and of sound is embarrassed by the facts that the retina is always under excitation from the chemical changes going on in its pigments, and therefore has a certain quantum of so-called " light of its own," and that such a thing as " absolute stillness " cannot probably be secured for the ear. Total absence of sensation in the ear, could it be secured, would not be comparable to the black which we see with the eyes closed. 1 The upper limit, or maximum amount of stimulus which the ner- vous organism can receive, cannot be determined experimentally. The use of excessive quantities of stimulus is not only too fatigu- ing but also too dangerous to the structure of this organism (for example, of blinding light upon the eye, stunning noise in the ear, etc.) to admit of successful experiment in this direction. Moreover, the application calls out so much of those varied forms of feeling which are allied with all the specific sensations as to overwhelm the latter with the former. Very concentrated, sour, or bitter solu- tions, or very intense odors, are not simply tasted and smelled ; they are also felt with all the adjoining parts of the body. Very strong light and very loud noise do not simply heighten the specific sensa- tions of sight and hearing, they rather destroy them in a flood of pain- ful feeling. We may affirm in general, however, that the " capacity " of each sense varies directly as the amount of stimulus which it can receive. The " circuit " or range of the sensations of each sense f 1 1 may then be said to be where _ stands for the measure of the S S sensitiveness, and C for the measure of the capacity, of each sense. 2 1 On the question whether absolute stillness is possible, and whether the ear has any sensation comparable to the black of the eye, see Lotze, Medicinische Psychologie, p. 218; Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrbuch d. Psychologie, 1884, I., p. 273 ; and Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., p. 380 f. 2 See Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, i., p. 324. 364 MEASUREMENT OF SENSATIONS. 8. There are three methods of determining experimentally the least observable differences in sensations. These are called, (1) the method of least observable difference ; (2) the method of average errors ; (3) the method of correct and mistaken cases. Of the three methods, the first bears the name which suggests the real subject of investigation in them all. This method is divided by Wundt ' and others into two namely, the method of mean grada- tions of sensation, and the method of minimum changes of sensation. But these are really only two modes of applying one method. In the one case an attempt is made to form a scale of stimuli whose intervals correspond to equally large intervals in our estimate of the resulting sensations, by judging what amount of the stimulus produces a sensa- tion (M) that lies exactly midway between two other sensations (A and O) separated by a clearly perceptible interval (hence A : M : : M : O). Between A and M another middle term, the sensation of magnitude K, may then be sought and found ; and so on until the limit of observ- able differences is reached. This mode is, however, less comprehen- sive and fruitful than the second mode of applying the same principle. The " method of minimum changes in sensation " seeks directly to establish, all along the scale of intensities of the stimuli, that change in their strength which is just enough (and no more than enough) to produce a minimum change in sensation. Such minimum change may be conceived of as standing just on the " threshold " of our power to make distinctions in the degrees of strength with which our sensations are apprehended in consciousness. 3 The *' method of average errors" (2) begins by fixing upon some given sensation which is known to be caused by a given intensity of stimulus ; the attempt is then made also to fix upon another stimulus, by means of the sensation it produces, as being exactly equal to the former. The trial results in a number of guesses that are more or less out of the way. By averaging all the cases of trial, the degree of sensitiveness to distinctions is discovered. In other words, the method attempts to determine, at each point along the scale and for each kind of stimulus, the differences in the strength of stimuli that are just below the amount necessary to make an ob- servable difference in the resulting sensations. In the " method of correct and mistaken cases " (3) minute ad- ditions or subtractions of the amount of stimulus are made, with the intent of seeing how many cases of right and how many of 1 See Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, i., p. 325 f., and comp. his Philosoph- ische Studien, 1881, p. 8 f. 2 Called "Unterschiedsschwelle" by Fechuer, Elemented. Psychophysik, i., p. 242. CORRECT AND MISTAKEN GUESSES. 365 wrong guessing, respectively, will result for each of the different positions in the scale of the stimuli, and for each kind of stimulus. If, then, the proportion of the number of correct to mistaken guesses is kept the same for all points of the scale, the amount of change in the stimulus necessary for this may be held to measure the sen- sitiveness to differences which belongs to each of these points. Thus, let n = the whole number of guesses, and r = the number T of right guesses ; then = the sensitiveness to differences. But the positive value of this quotient being kept unchanged, the amount of stimulus added to or subtracted from the original amount will measure the sensitiveness to differences for all points of the scale. This method has been largely used and warmly defended by Fechner l in experimenting with sensations of pressure. Much doubt has, however, been thrown upon the use made of it by this observer ; and especially upon the propriety of reckoning the doubt- ful cases one-half to the right and one-half to the wrong guesses. 2 A comparison of the above-mentioned methods shows that they are all simply different ways of measuring the sensitiveness of the mind to minute differences in the quantity of its sensations as de- pendent upon changes in the intensity of the stimuli. They should never be employed, therefore, without taking into account the fact that various other causes, besides such objective changes in the stimuli, always co-operate to determine the degree of this mental sensitiveness. To eliminate these other factors from the calculation is by no means easy. 9. The one law which claims to be a scientific expression of the relations between changes in the intensity of stimuli and changes in the quantity of the resulting sensations is that known by the name of E. H. Weber. This observer originally used the method of least observable differences as applied to sensations of pressure and to the measurement of lines by the eye. 3 " Weber's law" has been elaborated, confirmed by a vast amount of experiment, and defended as a psycho-physical principle of the widest application, by Fechner (in the works referred to, note, p. 361). The significant addition which Fechner has made to Weber's law consists in the assumption that all just observable differences are equally great. 4 1 Elemente d. Psychophysik, i. , pp. 93-120. 8 On this point see, especially, G. E. Miiller, Grundlegung d. Psychophy- sik, p. 36 f. ; and Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, i. , p. 330 f . 3 Especially in articles on the sense of touch, in R. Wagner's Handworterb. d. Physiologie, III., ii. ; and Archiv. f. Anat, Physiol., etc., 1835, pp. 152 if. 4 On this point comp. Funke, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol. , III. , ii. , p. 349 f. ; and Wundt, Philosophische Studien, II., Heft 1, p. 6 f. 366 THE LAW OF WEBER. It is therefore also called " Fechner's law." As an empirical law it attempts to put into scientific form, on the basis of experimen- tal investigation, the truth of ordinary experience namely, our estimate of the difference in amount between two sensations is not directly proportioned to the real difference in their stimuli, but the latter must increase faster than does the former. For ex- ample, the difference in the intensity of the shadows cast by one and by two wax tapers is very perceptible in a dimly lighted room, but is altogether un observable in open sunlight ; or the strength with which two clocks tick can be discriminated with much nicety, but not the amount of noise made by two successive discharges of a cannon. In other words, if we assume that the least observable difference in sensations may be regarded as a constant quantity, then, in order to produce this increase or decrease in the amount of sen- sation, the addition or subtraction of a much greater amount of stimulus is needed for the higher than for the lower portions of the scale. Weber's law undertakes to tell us how much greater such required amount of stimulus must be. It admits of statement in the several following ways : The difference between any two stimuli is experienced as of equal magnitude in case the mathematical re- lation of those stimuli remains unaltered ; or, If the intensity of the sensations is to increase by equal absolute magnitudes, then the relative increase of the stimulus must remain constant ; or, The strength of the stimulus must ascend in a geometrical proportion in case the strength of the sensation is to increase in an arith- metical proportion. 1 1 See Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, i., p. 335. For the detailed mathe- matical discussion and expression of Weber's law the reader is referred to the technical works, especially of Fechner and G. E. Miiller. A simple state- ment of Weber's principle may be given as follows : Let 11= the intensity of the light of one-half of a white field ; -^j- = the smallest fraction of stimulus added to H that will produce an observable increase in this intensity ; and H + JL the intensity of the other half of the same field. Then let 8 = the sensation produced by H; 8+ s = the sensation produced by H+ yf^; and 8 will, of course, represent the so-called least observable difference at this point in the scale. We have, then, H produces 8; J5T+ -^ t or |ft //, pro- duces 8 + s ; |U H+ i-^l^ , or IgMSo & produces 8 + 8 + 8 ; and so on. That is to say, if s is to be kept of the same magnitude, then ZTmust be mul- tiplied by the same magnitude (ffto)- The three fundamental formulas which Fechner has employed to state and demonstrate the law are the following : Let S be the magnitude of the sensa- tion caused by the stimulus 2, and A/6' a just observable increase in this sen- QUANTITY OF TACTUAL SENSATIONS. 367 The empirical data upon which the advocates of Weber's law rely are very numerous, but their value and trustworthiness are often much diminished by the fact that most experimenters have failed to isolate sufficiently the exact problem which it was desired to solve. Nevertheless, the data show that the law summarizes many facts reasonably well within a certain range of sensations lying near the middle of the scale of quantity* Near both the upper and the lower limits the law fails to prove applicable ; even in the regions and under the circumstances which are most favorable it is only approximately true. Many fluctuations of unknown significance and origin occur in all the senses. 10. In determining the least observable sensations of touch, the result is largely dependent upon the presence of muscular sen- sations also. It further depends upon the method in which the comparison is made ; for, as Weber discovered, an actually present sensation can be compared with the remembered image of one just past better than two present sensations can be compared. The in- terval of time and the locality of the organ have also a great influ- ence/ Most persons observe a stronger sensation of pressure when the weight is laid on the left than when it is laid on the symmetri- cal place of the right side. The same amount of surface must be covered, and the objects compared must have the same temperature, in order to secure trustworthy results of experiment. Weber found that, when the interval was fifteen to thirty seconds, under the most favorable circumstances, 14J could be distinguished from 15 grammes, or 14 J from 15 ounces. That is, some persons can distinguish weights which differ as 29 : 30, by the sensations of pressure they occasion, when laid on the volar side of the last phalanges. By raising the weights the nicety of discrimination can be increased so as to be represented by the proportion 39 : 40. sation which is caused by an increase of the stimulus = A2. Let C be a con- stant dependent on the values chosen for 8 and 2. Then AS = =-. Let it be further assumed that AS remains constant whatever values for S and A2 are assumed; then dS = Q d ~, and by integration 8G log. 2, which is Fechner's "fundamental formula." But if the stimulus is just below the least observable amount, and be = 2, then substituting in the above formula we have C log. 2 ; from which Fechner derives formula No. 2 (the formula of measurement), namely, 8= Clog. J, which means that the magnitude of the sensation is " negative," in case the stimulus sinks below the least observ- able = 2'. If two sensations (8 and 8) are observably different, then S S' = C (log. 2 log. 2') ; this is called the "formula of difference," and means that the difference in the intensity of two sensations is proportional to the logarithm of the quotient of the magnitudes of their stimuli. 368 THE LAW OF WEBER. By an extended series of experiments with weights ranging from 300 to 3,000 grammes Fechner ' employed the method of correct and mistaken cases to confirm Weber's law as applied to combined sensations of pressure and of the muscular sense. Some experi- ments were made with both hands ; others with the right or left separately. The weight used to add or subtract was either 0.04 or 0.08 of the absolute weight. The results showed that the law held only approximately for all the series of experiments, and not abso- lutely for any one series. As calculated by G. E. Mtiller a they give, instead of a constant quotient to express the degree of sensi- tiveness (as Weber's law requires), a quotient varying from T J ^ for weights of 300 grammes to T 1 7 for weights of 3,000 grammes. Nor can Fechner's effort to correct the variation, by introducing after- ward a conjectural allowance for the weight of the arm itself, be considered successful. 3 Biedermann and Lowit, by the method of just observable differences, obtained results departing widely from Weber's law. 4 By experimenting with weights varying from 10 to 500 grammes they found that the sensitiveness to pressure rose with the increase of the weights from 10 to 400 grammes, and then fell off rapidly, as the following table will show : Absolute weight. Least observable difference. Quotient of sensitiveness. Grammes. Grammes. 10 0.7 -fr 50 1.7 iV 100 2.4 -^ 200 3.6 -fa 300 4.6 T&- 400 5.2 Jr 450 6.5 ife 500 25.5 A The trustworthiness of these results is impaired, however, by the fact that no method, except the doubtful one of directing "atten- tion " exclusively to the sensations of pressure, was employed to exclude the disturbing effect of the muscular sensations. The same observers concluded, also, that the fineness of the muscular sense, when isolated, does not vary according to Weber's law. They fixed it at ^ for weights of 250 grammes, y^ for weights of 2,500 grammes, -^ for weights of 2,750 grammes. That Weber's law does not hold good, near the lower limits, for 1 Elemente d. Psychophysik, i. , p. 183 f. * Zur Grundlegung d. Psychophysik, p. 197. 3 In Sachen d. Psychophysik, p. 198. 4 See Bering, Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., LXXII., Abth. iii., p. 342 f. QUANTITY OF TEMPERATURE-SENSATIONS. 369 sensations of pressure, and of muscular innervation and movement, is admitted by all. The absolute sensitiveness of these sensations differs greatly, as has been shown (p. 346 1), for different localities on the surface of the body. Aubert and Kammler found the light- est weight which produced a sensation of touch to be 0.002 gramme on the forehead, temples, and dorsal side of the forearm and hands ; 0.003 gramme for the volar side of the forearm ; 0.005 gramme for the nose, lips, chin, eyelids, and skin of abdomen ; 0.005-0.015 gramme for the volar side of the fingers ; and 1 gramme for the fingernails and skin of the heel. This kind of sensitiveness has been thought to be chiefly dependent upon the number of the nervous elements present in the skin, its thickness, the character of its tension over the underlying parts, etc. ; but its variations are by no means parallel with those of the sharpness of the sense of localit} r . The foregoing and similar conclusions all need to be re- vised in the light of Goldscheider's determinations of the pressure- spots. 11. Extraordinary difficulties accompany the attempt to apply Weber's law to sensations of temperature. As has already been seen (p. 350 f.), we do not know exactly what to measure whether the rising and falling of the thermic apparatus, or its actual tempera- ture in relation to its own zero-point ' as constituting the quanti- tative changes in the stimuli. Even Fechner admits that Weber's law does not apply to ' ^ sensitiveness of the hand to changes in temperature when it ' e . cooling off; but he thinks the law holds good approxi or degrees of warmth varying between 25 and 37.5 C. .5 Fahr.), if 18.71 C. (65.66 Fahr.) be taken as the z * The assumption of this zero-point is, however, arb : No general rule for the quantity of sensations of tempera' . well be given except this : the skin is most sensitive f ,s which lie near its own zero-point. In compar- ing twr atures it is most favorable to nice discrimination that f Ad lie slightly above, the other slightly below, this poir degrees of the thermometer between which the maxi- m ,ensitiveness is attainable are given differently by differ- jrvers : By Nothnagel, 27-33 C. (80.6-91.4 Fahr.) ; by .nann, 26-39 C.; by Alsberg, 35-39 C.; by Fechner, 12- J. where it is so great as not to be easily measurable by a od quicksilver thermometer (about | Fahr.). Cold and heat alike, ,vhen applied for some time, reduce greatly the sensitiveness of the skin to minute changes of temperature ; by heat it can be so dulled as not to distinguish alterations of less than 5 or f Fahr.; 1 So Heriug, see Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 430. 24 370 THE LAW OF WEBER. by cold it can be rendered insensible to changes measuring from 2 to 5. We have already seen (comp. p. 348 f.) that the sense of tempera- ture depends for its fineness upon the extent and locality of the sur- face excited. Weber found that water at 29 R, in which the whole hand was immersed, seemed warmer than that at 32 R, to a single finger. Nothnagel placed the following values upon the fine- ness of discrimination, for minute variations in temperature, of dif ferent parts of the body : Middle breast, 0.6 C.; sides of the same, 0.4; middle of the back, 1.2; sides of the same, 0.9; hollow of the hand, 0.5-0.4; back of the same, 0.3; parts of upper and lower arm, 0.2; cheeks, 0.4-0.2; temples, 0.4-0.3. More recent investiga- tions have shown that the table of sensitiveness for the different parts of the body must take account of the division of the temperature- sense into two species, and of the locality of the heat-spots and cold-spots in all such different parts. On the basis of experiment with areas of the skin whose topography with respect to the tem- perature-sense had previously been investigated, Goldscheider has given a lengthy statement 1 of the sensitiveness of different parts of the body. Thus he finds that the skin of the head is, in general, little developed for the sense of cold, and only in a few places for the sense of heat. The sensitiveness of the forehead to cold is intense, but to heat only moderate ; that of the breast to cold moderate along the sternum, and elsewhere very intense, while to heat it is only moderate except near the nipples ; that of the back everywhere very intense to cold, and only moderate to heat ; while in all parts of the hand the intensity of sensitiveness to both cold and heat is alike. In general, the skin in the median line of the body seems much less sensitive to changes in temperature than at its sides ; and the number of thermic elements (according to Goldscheider, the dis- tributory fibrils of the temperature-nerves), the thickness of the skin, etc., are determining factors. 12. The possibility of executing or appreciating a musical passage in which the intensity of the successive notes is brought to a certain standard of memory, or in which these notes are nicely shaded so as to constitute a crescendo or a diminuendo, appears to depend upon applying to sensations of sound some law resembling that of Weber. It is partly by comparing such sensations with their images in memory that the singer or player reproduces certain 1 See the Archiv f. Auat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth.j 1885, Supplement- Band, pp. 60 ff. MEASUREMENT OF SOUND. 371 notes previously executed, with about the same stress of tone. 1 Moreover, in order to shade the relative intensities of successive tones, our appreciation of their differences needs to be much greater for those that have a low degree of intensity. Many obstacles, however, stand in the way of determining either the lower limit or the least observable difference for sensations of sound. The general difficulty which belongs to investigating the intensity of sensations, even under the most favorable circumstances, is here enhanced by the facts, that the pitch and timbre of each clang have much to do with our judgment of its strength ; that different ears differ so widely in their organic susceptibility, while the mind is peculiarly sensitive to changes of feeling and judgment connect- ed with sensations of sound, and thus very weak sensations are vacillating and unsteady in consciousness, and sounds appear and disappear in the ear while the degree of stimulus and of attention are unchanged ; that the reflection and interference of the acoustic nerves, their distance and direction, and the absence or presence of " entotic " sounds, are so influential ; and, finally, that it is impossi- ble to discover a sounding apparatus of definitely ascertainable and uniform intensity of action. 13. None of the means employed for determining the amount of stimulus necessary to produce the weakest sensations of sound, or the least observable differences in such sensations, are entirely satisfactory. The method of listening to noises made by falling weights is rendered uncertain by the fact that the character, both of the weight and of the surface on which it strikes, has so much in- fluence. Moreover, it is a matter of dispute whether the intensity of the stimulus is to be measured by the product of the mass into the height from which the body falls (ra x h) or into the square- root of that height (in x Vh). It is possible that neither of these measurements is exact. 2 Assuming the former to be correct (noise = m x h\ by using a sound-pendulum A. W. Volkmann found that diTerences in intensity are observable when they stand in the pro- portion 3 : 4. Vierordt, on the other hand, concluded that the latter measurement (noise = m y/h ) is more nearly correct; and by assum- ing Vierordt's view, and using iron balls that fell vertically on a vi- brating plate, Norr * attempted to fix a unit of measurement. This unit he made = 1,500 milligramme-millimetres with the ear distant 50 ctm. from the source of the sound. Experimenting with sounds 1 Comp. Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., p. 345 f. 8 Comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, i. , p. 341 and note ; and E. Tischer, in Philosophische Studien, L, heft 4, p. 543 f. Zeitschrift f. Biologie, 1879, XV., p. 297 f. 372 THE LAW OF WEBER. ranging in intensity from those a little above the least observable to those of unpleasant strength (1.71-524167.8 times the unit), and dividing the entire scale into 7 groups, within each of which about 1,000 experiments were conducted, he found that the proportion of right guesses to the entire number made f ^remained approxi- mately constant that is, that Weber's law holds for sounds of vary- ing intensity. A large allowance, however, had to be made for relations of time ; the percentage of correct guesses being about 8. 7 larger when the sound of greater intensity followed that of less intensity. More recently, E. Tischer 1 has apparently added some evidence to the validity of Weber's law by experimenting with an improved form of the method of Vierordt and Norr. Keeping one of the two sounds to be compared at a constant intensity, he increased or diminished the other until from 4 to 6 successive correct guesses as to their relative value were obtained. But the fact that, when the second stimulus was diminished until certainty of judgment was obtained, very considerable unexplained variations from the results expected by Weber's law occurred leaves much doubt still hanging over the matter. In order to harmonize the conflicting results, the proposal has been made to introduce another function into the formula, noise = m h or ra\M. All the investigations, therefore, still leave the question of the applicability of Weber's law to sensations of sound in a rather uncertain condition. Little or nothing has been accomplished by experiment to de- termine whether the same law applies to the intensity of musical tones. Among the various factors which enter into our judgment of the intensity of tones, the " color-clang " is especially influential. 3 Absolute pitch and intervals of pitch are also very important. In general, tones and noises of a higher pitch, with an equal objective intensity of stimulus, are judged to be louder than those of a lower pitch. Konig showed that a tuning-fork of the pitch c must hfve about four times the amplitude of vibration required by one of the pitch (7, in order to produce upon the ear the same effect from the same distance. 14. The various attempts to determine the lower limit of sound for the human ear have not resulted in any precise statement. Schafhautl, after experiments in as near perfect stillness as possi- ble, at midnight, fixed the limit at the noise made by a cork ball of 1 milligramme weight (about 0.0154 gr.) falling from a height of 1 1 Wundt's Philosophische Studien, 1883, I., heft 4, pp. 495 ff. 3 Comp. Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., p. 364 f. LOWER LIMIT OF SOUND. 373 millimetre (0.03937 inch). Boltzmann and Topler have reached results which Hensen 1 considers to be as accurate as possible. By measuring the compression of the air at the end of an organ-pipe of 181 vibrations per second, they calculated that, even under circum- stances not as favorable as possible, the ear responds with sensation to an amplitude in the vibration of the molecules of the air not more than 0.00004 mm. at the ear, or about -f-$ the wave-length of green light. The mechanical work done upon the ear-drum in a single vibration of such small intensity is reckoned at not more than ^J-y billionth kilogrammetre ; or only about ^ T of that done upon the same surface of the pupils of the eye by a single candle at the same distance. These calculations indicate that the motions in the cochlea which excite the end-organs of sense are astonishingly minute far too minute to be observed even by the microscope. Yet the sharpness of hearing may be enormously increased by dis- 15. Judgments of the intensity of sounds are dependent also upon practice, and upon other psycho-physical conditions such as determine the nicety of all judgments of quality. Small impres- sions of noise are apt to have their intensity underestimated ; the inclination to do this has been attributed to the influence of our custom of withdrawing attention from them altogether under ordi- nary circumstances. 2 The fact that sounds to which we become accustomed lose most of their intensity in consciousness must be explained chiefly under the same law of mental habit ; it cannot, on the other hand, be largely due to the physiological law of exhaus- tion. g 16. Attention was early called to the law of judgment in esti- mating the quantitative relations of sensations of sight, on account of its connection with astronomical observation. In the preceding century French physicists had already begun to investigate the sensitiveness of the eye to varying intensities of light. Bouguer, in answer to the question, What force must a light have in order to make a more feeble one disappear? placed the fraction of least observable difference in the intensities of two shadows at -fa. That the magnitudes of the stars are not to be classified according to their absolute brightness as determined by photometric observa- tions was, of course, assumed by Sir John Herschel when he made the latter vary in the series 1 : : ^ : fa, while the former vary in the series 1:2:3:4. That the least observable difference in the intensity of two sensations of sight is absolutely much smaller for 1 See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii , p. 117 f. 2 So Stumpf, Tonpsychologie, I., p. 388. 374 THE LAW OF WEBER. those of the lowest grade of intensity is a truth needed to explain many every-day experiences. For example, the finer gradations of shade in a lithograph or photograph are not lost when we take it from the open sunlight into a rather dimly lighted room ; we can also observe them through smoked glass, if it be not too black. Through the same media we can measure rather delicate shades of brightness on the clouds. We observe, however, that in all such cases either too great or too weak intensity of the light destroys our power to distinguish the finest gradations of its intensity. 17. It has already been shown (p. 326) that the retina is never free from light of its own which has a varying intensity ; this fact greatly increases the difficulty of fixing accurately either the lower limit or the least observable difference of visual sensations. In the effort to apply Weber's law to sensations of color, the laws of change in the quality operate to obscure the laws of change in the quantity of the sensations. Experiments with shadows for the sake of testing Weber's law were first conducted by A. W. Volkmann and others, under the direction of Fechner. 1 By measuring the distance to which a candle must be removed from an object in order that the shadow produced by its light might disappear in that of another candle of like intensity situated at a fixed near distance from the ob- ject, the quotient for the least observable difference was found to be T J 7 . This quotient was also found to remain nearly constant for absolute intensities varying from 1 to 38.79. If, however, the light of the background diminished to 0.36 in intensity, marked varia- tions in the law occurred ; the difference in the brightness of the two shadows had then to be greater than T j-j- to be observable. Later experiments of the same observer yielded results less favorable to Weber's law. 3 The quotient was found to vary from -^^ for weak intensities of light to T |^ for stronger intensities. By using rotating disks and comparing the grayish circles made upon them when revolving rapidly, through the admixture of small black stripes with the white of their surfaces ("Masson's Disks"), Helmholtz 3 found the medium value of the quotient of least observ- able difference to be yj ? ; this quotient is not constant, however, and increases, especially for sensations near the upper or the lower limit. By changing the method somewhat, Aubert obtained a variation of T J 7 to T J-jj- in the degree of sensitiveness to differences in the brightness of lights, even when not going above the middle of the scale of intensity. Experiments with such intensities as lie nearest 1 See Elemente d. Psychophysik, p. 148 f. 8 A. W. Volkmann, Physiolog. Untersuchungen, I., p. 56 f. 3 Physiologische Optik, p. 315 f. INTENSITY OF COLOR-TONES. 375 the limits showed much greater departures from Weber's law. Just above the lower limit, an addition of even ^ to ^ to the stimulus might be necessary in order to produce an observable difference in the resulting sensation. Similar results have been obtained by Delboeuf, but, on the whole, more favorable to Weber's law than the results of Aubert. A more accurate and carefully guarded series of experiments than any of the foregoing is recently reported by Dr. Emil Krae- pelin. 1 This experimenter used the method of just observable dif- ferences as applied to Masson's disks when looked at through gray glasses of varying intensity. The utmost care seems to have been taken to exclude disturbances from changes in the adjustment of the eye, retinal exhaustion, reflection of light from surrounding objects, etc. Three groups of experiments were conducted one by daylight, one by candlelight, one by lamplight. Both eyes were experimented upon ; and both directions of alteration in the intensity of the stimulus (stronger following weaker, and vice versa) were employed. Kraepelin concludes that for the unexhausted eye, with a good power of accommodation, the fraction which gives the least observable difference remains constant, while the intensity of the light varies between values of 1,000 and 9.61 of absolute inten- sity as fixed for his experiments. That is, within these limits the law of Weber holds good as expressing with closely approximating accuracy the results of experiment. The experiments of Dobrowolsky 2 and Lamansky 3 with light of the different spectral color-tones shows that, with these sensations also, Weber's law holds approximately good for moderate intensi- ties, but is subject to considerable variations as we approach the upper and the lower limits. The former used the method of com- paring a white surface with one in which colored light had been mixed with the white. On changing the absolute intensity of the light between values of 1 and 0.0302, only a slight variation in the quotient indicating the least observable difference of intensity ap- peared for the color red. This quotient was found, by the same observer, 4 however, to be very different for different color-tones : thus for red, ^ ; yellow, V ; green, ^ ; blue, ^ ; violet, ^. Laman- sky and others have made the sensitiveness to changes in the inten- sity of color-tones greatest for green instead of violet ; and have ob- tained other results different from those obtained by Dobrowolsky. 18. The minimum of the intensity of light appreciable by the 1 In Wundt's Philosophische Studien, 1884, II., heft 2, pp. 306 ff. 2 Pfluger's Archiv, xii., p. 441 f. 3 Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, XVII. , i., p. 123 f. 4 Ibid., XVIII., i., p. 74 f. 376 THE LAW OF WEBER. eye under the most favorable circumstances was fixed by Aubert at 3~^y- of that reflected from white paper in the light of the full-moon. This result can only be considered as approximate. The individ- ual factor in all such calculations must be held to be very large and variable ; especially, perhaps, if we admit that there is a class of so-called " sensitives " to whom the ends of an electro-magnet when excited appear luminous, as Reichenbach's experiments seem to show. Weber applied his own law to so-called extensive sensa- tions of sight. He showed that in judging of the comparative length of lines the least observable difference is, for each person, a tolerably constant fraction of the absolute length of the line with which the comparison is made. This fraction is different for differ- ent persons ; and has a range from -jL- to T ^. Fechner ' defends the validity of the law for lines of lengths varying between 10 and 240 mm. (f to 9 in.), with the eye removed from 1 ft. to 800 mm. (12-32 in.). The lower limit for such cases has been fixed by A. W. Volkmann at lines of length from 0.2 to 3.6 mm. It is obvious, however, that we are here not dealing with pure quantity of visual sensations, but with judgments of local relation which, in case the eyes are moved, have their basis, at least partly, in our power to dis- criminate minute differences in the sensations of the muscular sense connected with such movements. 19. The law of Weber can, of course, derive little or no sup- port from sensations of taste and smell. In the case of these two senses our knowledge of both series of quantities of the intensity of the stimulus and of the amount of specific sensation which re- sults from its application is altogether too inadequate to admit of trustworthy comparison. We cannot measure forms of energy like those by which smellable particles and tastable solutions act on the end-organs of sense, until we have a unit of measurement and some information as to what the object is to which the standard should be applied. Nor can we compare amounts of sensations that are so largely matters of individual origin and capricious change, and that are so overlaid with other forms of feeling, as are the sensations of these senses. Moreover, the element of time both as respects the interval elapsing between the two sensations com- pared and also the order in which the sensations follow each other is here a very important influence. The intensity of taste depends upon a variety of circumstances besides the objective quantity of the stimulus. Among these cir- cumstances is the extent of surface excited. Camerer 8 found by 1 Elemente d. Psychophysik, i , p 211 f. 2 See Zeitschr. f. "Biologic, 1870, VI., p. 440 f. MEASUREMENT OF TASTE. 377 experimenting with common salt in solutions of different degrees of concentration that the number of correct guesses increased almost in exact proportion to the number of gustatory papillae upon which the solutions were placed. Certain mechanical and thermic con- ditions also have a great influence. Substances even in fluid form, when quickly swallowed, have little taste ; pressing and rubbing against the gustatory organs, movement of the tastable matter in the mouth, increase the excitatory effect of the stimuli. It is doubtful whether this effect is due solely to the mechanical result of spreading the stimulus over the surface and urging it into the pores against the end-organs of the sense, or in part also to some direct physiological cause. The influence of temperature on the intensity of sensations of taste is well known. Weber showed that if the tongue is held for J to 1 minute in very cold water, or in wa- ter of about 125 Fahr., the sweet taste of sugar can no longer be perceived. Cold also destroys for a time the susceptibility to bitter tastes. Keppler ! endeavored to test Weber's law by deter- mining the sensitiveness to minute changes in the four principal kinds of taste ; and arrived at a negative result. Fechner, how- ever, considers that Keppler's experiments with common salt confirm Weber's law, and that his other experiments were not adapted to yield any assured result. We can only repeat the statement that other causes than mere increase in the quantity of the stimulus so largely determine the intensity of the resulting sensations as to discredit any arguments from the experiments either for or against applying Weber's law to sensations of taste. 20. The experiments of Valentin 3 and others, to determine how weak solutions of various substances will excite the end-organs of taste, are chiefly valuable as gratifying our curiosity. The figures are not to be accepted as exact, but as showing in general the ex- treme fineness of this sense, and the great difference of different substances in their power to excite it. Valentin found, for exam- ple, that 0.24 gramme of a solution containing 1.2 per cent, of cane- sugar excited the sensation of sweet ; a solution containing r |^ part of common salt was scarcely detectable ; of sulphuric acid T extract of aloes contain- ing sWroTF cou ld l> e distinguished from distilled water; -^oTiT of sulphate of quinine was plainly observable, and the observer thought he could detect a slight trace of bitter when the solution was diluted to nroizrrni f ^ia substance. In general, a smaller absolute quantity of stimulus, when in a relatively concentrated 1 Pfluger's Archiv, 1869, ii., p. 449 f. 2 In his Lehrb. d. Physiol. d. Menschen, 2 ed., Abth. 2. 378 THE LAW OF WEBER. solution, will suffice to excite the end-organs of taste. 1 It will readily be seen that the minimum of some of these substances which will give rise to a sensation under the most favorable cir- cumstances is exceedingly small. 21. The intensity of sensations of smell is also largely depend- ent on other causes than changes in the quantity of the stimuli. The amount of sensation appears to be largely governed by the extent of surface excited ; since it is greater when we smell with both nostrils, and with the current of inspiration which carries the exciting particles over more of the sensitive membrane. No as- sured results on this point, however, have yet been reached. Val- entin supposes that a smaller number of odorous particles will excite sensation if presented in a concentrated rather than a dilute form. When the intensity of the stimulus increases beyond a cer- tain point, the character of the resulting sensation changes often- times from a pleasant to an unpleasant tone of feeling. All are familiar with the fact that a large increase of some smells for example, musk does not give the same kind of sensation. This sense has a great degree of "sharpness," or power to be excited by small quantities of stimulus, as distinguished from " fineness," or power to distinguish minute variations in the sensations. It is undoubtedly different in different species of animals, as dependent upon unknown differences in their psycho-physical constitution ; but it is tolerably uniform among men where there is the same cultivation of it, and the same concentration of attention. It is well known that certain animals have an astonishing fineness of smell, and are able by it even to detect the individual variations that are quite imperceptible to man. Little value can be attached to the results reached by experiments to fix the least number of smellable substances which can excite the human end-organs of this sense. In general, we can say that incredibly small quanti- ties of some substances will suffice. Valentin found that a current of air containing ^ oV^TT f va P or of bromine excited a strong un- pleasant sensation. Atmosphere polluted with even -pnrfoiriT f sulphuretted hydrogen could be detected. It was calculated by this observer that ^--fro o"oT7) f a milligramme of alcoholic extract of musk is about as little as can be perceived. The effect of constant over-excitement of the organs of this sense, in deadening their sen- sibility, is too well known to require illustration. No argument for or against Weber's law can safely be drawn from sensations of smell. 22. A review of the preceding facts confirms what was previ- 1 See Camerer's table in Pfluger's Archiv, ii., p. 322. INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW. 379 ously said as to the unsatisfactory nature of the evidence adduced in proof of the principle which is thought to control the quantita- tive relations of our sensations and their stimuli. At best, Weber's law is only an approximately correct statement of what holds true of the relative intensity of certain sensations of sight and hearing, and, less exactly, of pressure and the muscular sense, when these sensations are of moderate strength, and other causes for variations in their intensity, besides objective changes in the amount of the stimulus, are as far as possible excluded. In general, it is true that the amount of matter pressing on the skin, or lifted by moving the arm or leg, as well as the intensity of the waves of light and sound acting on eye and ear, must increase much more rapidly than does the intensity of the resulting sensations, as estimated by comparing them with each other in consciousness. Within certain limits for the above-mentioned four kinds of sensation, the latter scale of quantities is ordinarily related to the former about as an arithmet- ical to a geometrical series. But other conditions than mere increase in the objective quantity of the stimulus largely determine its effect upon the resulting amount of sensation. Stimuli and sensa- tions are not connected quantitatively in such a simple manner that we can measure one off in terms of the other ; so much feeling for so much amplitude of wave-lengths, or work done on the end-organs by mechanical pressure. Numerous factors, some of which are individual and extremely obscure and variable, constantly mix with the purely quantitative relations between sensations and their stimuli. 23. The value of Weber's law ia so restricted, even as stating a general fact of experience, that it would seem scarcely necessary to discuss at length its higher significance. Three possible modes of explanation have all had their defenders ; these are the physio- logical, the psycho-physical, and the psychological. The first of the three assumes that the physical construction of the nervous system, including chiefly the end-organs of sense and their central representatives and connections, is such as to supply the reason for this relation between the intensity of sensations and that of their stimuli. And certainly, if we were to make any assumption, it would be that the quantitative relation between the last ante- cedent molecular changes in the brain and the mental changes to which they give rise, is one of simple proportion ; the more work done by means of the excitation in the appropriate cerebral centres, the more of physical basis laid, as it were, for a resulting quantity of psychical movement. If, then, the sensations vary in quantity in an arithmetical pro- 380 THE LAW OF WEBER. portion, while their external stimuli vary in a geometrical propor- tion, the explanation of the fact must be found somewhere in the chain of events between the external stimuli and the nerve-commo- tions set up as a result in the appropriate centres of the brain. And without doubt the explanation of so much as is true of Weber's law lies largely in physiological causes ; but our knowledge of the struct- ure and function of the end-organs of sense, and especially of their cerebral representative elements, is so incomplete that no satisfac- tory statements can be made on this point. In all of the senses, the end-organs profoundly modify the intensity of the stimulus they re- ceive. In the so-called chemical senses (smell, taste, sight) a pro- found quantitative modification takes place, even before the stimu- lus reaches the fibrils of the sensory nerve. In the case of the mechanical sense of hearing we cannot say how much of the effect stated in Weber's law may not have been gained even before the acoustic waves set agoing the nervous elements of the organ of Corti. As to profounder modifications in the same direction by reason of the interaction of different nerve-elements in the brain we are yet more ignorant. And although we can have little confidence in Wundt's 1 theory of an " apperception-centre " and its influence in accounting for Weber's law, we cannot deny the general assump- tion on which that theory is based. The psycho -physical explanation of Weber's law is that adopted by Fechner. This explanation insists upon making the law one of the utmost generality and of the highest import as stating the re- lations between organic and spiritual activities. Although Fech- ner's view confessedly grew out of his speculation that body and mind are only two phenomenal aspects, as it were, of one and the same underlying reality, 2 it has been defended by him with a great amount of mathematical science and experimental research. No other form of explanation, however, takes us so much into the regions of utter obscurity. Why the quantitative relations of body and mind should be such, and such only, that a geometrical series of changes in the one should invariably be represented by an arith- metical series of changes in the other, must indeed remain an ulti- mate mystery. And the experimental proof of Weber's law is as yet much too incomplete to make us ready to accept it as an ulti- mate psycho-physical principle. The psychological explanation of Weber's law resolves it into a special case under the greater law of the relativity of our inner his Physiol. Psychologie, i., p. 351 f., and ii., p. 207 f . ; also Philosophische Studien, 1883, II., heft 1, p. 31 f. 9 In proof, see his Revision d. Hauptpuncte d. Psychophysik, p. 13 f. THE LAW OF RELATIVITY. 381 states. It is not so much, then, a law of the absolute quantity of sensations as dependent on stimuli, but rather a law of our ap- prehension in consciousness of the relation of our own feelings. In general, it may be said that every mental state has its value de- termined, both as respects its quality and its so-called quantity, by its relation to other states. It is the amount of change rather than the absolute amount of feeling which the mental apperception esti- mates. That the psychological explanation is needed to account for the facts there can be no doubt when we consider how impor- tant are the elements of attention, mental habit, power of acute discrimination, etc., in determining our estimates of the quanti- tative relations of our sensations. Estimates that is, acts of the comparing judgment, are involved in the experience upon which reliance is placed for a demonstration of Weber's law. Further discussion of the significance and extent in application of the men- tal law of relativity will appear in other connections. The subject of the quantity of sensation as a matter of psycho-physical investi- gation is fitly closed with the following quotation from Wundt : l "In the imperfect condition of cerebral physiology, we are not seldom in a position to recognize the psychological formulating of certain laws, the physiological meaning of which still lies in ob- scurity or belongs to the domain of hypothesis." 1 Physiol. Psychologie, i., p. 352. CHAPTEK VI. THE PRESENTATIONS OF SENSE. 1. SENSATIONS are, primarily considered, modes of our being affected ; but the objects of sense are known as real beings, which are assumed to exist independent of the affections of our minds, and to have their inherent qualities disclosed to us through the operation of the senses. There is a wide interval, however, between our consciousness of being ourselves affected and the perception of " things " as having qualities resembling our mental states or re- vealed by them. This interval is filled, in nature, by the develop- ment of mind as conditioned upon its environment of sense-stimuli ; it must be filled in psychological theory, by a description of the process of development. Physiological Psychology constructs such theory as much as possible on a basis of experiment to determine how the various steps in the mental development are related to the changes which the stimuli produce in the nervous system, espe- cially, of course, in the organs of sense. Upon this work of con- struction it has expended its choicest resources and utmost ingenu- ity. Its efforts are yet far from being completely successful. Many of the secondary principles, and even questions of fact, are still un- settled ; no theory of perception that will account satisfactorily for all the admitted truths has hitherto been discovered. Nor is this lack of complete success surprising, when we consider how rapid and complex are the processes which combine to form the world of sensible objects ; as well as how entire is the loss suffered by memory and consciousness of those details which served as a basis for the earlier and most significant stages of the development. Nor should we fail to take account of the fact that the mechan- ism of both nervous system and mind operates as rendered native to the individual by his inheriting the results of many ages of an- cestral experience. The psychologist does not remember by what stages he first learned to see or feel the extended and external ob- jects of sense. The child cannot describe the process to the psy- chologist ; the child is farther from his own infantile experience in this regard than the philosopher is from that of the child. It is COMMON-SENSE VIEW OF PERCEPTION. 383 not even likely that, if the infant were endowed with the developed power of searching his own consciousness, and of describing its contents, he could discover and impart what is needed in order to explain the process of his own mental development. In all stages of human growth the analyzable contents of consciousness represent only very imperfectly the nature of the basis upon which they rest. 2. Scientific analysis of the process of perception corrects in many particulars the so-called "common-sense" view. The convic- tion which everyone has on opening the eyes upon a landscape, for example, is undoubtedly that of being immediately impressed with a faithful copy of extra-mental reality. Some of the objects are seen as larger, others smaller, some in the foreground near by, and others more remote ; but all have that solid, substantial character which makes them things as distinguished from the images of revery or dreaming. But it is precisely the acquired power thus to construct the landscape which psychological science tries to explain. The ordi- nary conviction accepts the apparent fact of an immediate and certain knowledge of these things through the eyes, as though it were matter- of-course and needed no explanation. We must begin by removing certain assumptions obviously involved in the ordinary conviction. The forms of being and happening in the world, outside of the body, furnish in themselves no explanation whatever of the presen- tations of sense. ' This is as true of the colored or smooth extension of an object as it is of its sweet taste or disagreeable smell. What- ever exists e^ra-mentally, so far as its pure existence goes, is of no account to the mind. It is only as so-called "things " act upon us, or in other words get themselves expressed within the mind, by causing changes in our mental states, that any theory of knowledge by the senses can make use of them. Centuries ago the popular feeling was framed into a doctrine that semi-spiritualized copies of the material realities enter the body through the senses and meet the mind somewhere within ; or, that the mind itself, passing out through the openings of sense in semi-materialized form, embraces and so knows these realities. The time for all similar crude theo- ries of knowledge by the senses ought, however, to have long gone by. And yet fragments or suggestions of essentially the same assumptions are still frequent enough. What is true of all that exists and happens outside of the body is just as true of all the bodily conditions and processes. Strictly speaking, they can in themselves furnish no explanation for the rise and development of the presentations of sense. Only mental factors 1 Comp. Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrbucli d. Psychologie, Cothen, 1885, II., p. 1 f . ; and Lotze, Medicinische Psychologie, Leipzig, 1852, p. 3251 384 THE SYNTHESIS OF SENSATIONS. can be built into mental products. The simple sensations are in themselves always psychical phenomena, and are to be referred, as modes of its being and action, to the subject called " mind." It is only when considered in this way that they afford, by their charac- teristic qualities and modes of combination, any explanation of the resulting knowledge of things. The image on the retina, for exam- ple, is a necessary physical condition of the clear vision of outside objects ; it may also become an object for the inspection of another observer. But the retinal image never becomes a kind of inner object for one's own brain or mind. Nothing in its construction, in itself considered that is, as independent of the system of local- ized sensations which result on the other or psychical side of the transaction helps to explain the act of vision. What is true of the peripheral is also true of the central organs of sense. There is no image in the brain transmitted in exact copy from the retina by the optic nerve to its central nerve-fibres and nerve-cells ; if there were such a brain-image, we should need another eye connected with a second brain and mind to read it. The mind is never to be conceived of as contemplating a spatial picture of its object formed somewhere within the cerebral substance. Even more obvious is the worthlessness, for purposes of strictly psychological analysis, of all theory as to the precise spatial arrange- ment of the fibrils of sensory nerves within the skin or muscular fibre. That such fibrils exist in the muscles has apparently been de- monstrated by Sachs and others (comp. Chap. IV., 20) ; the nervous impulses occasioned in them, when conveyed to the central organs, are probably one main physical basis of those feelings of innerva- tion, of being in the body, etc., which enter as essential factors into the spatial perception -field of our own periphery. 1 But it is the muscular sensations, as modes of the affection of mind, which per- form this office. We have nothing approaching an immediate cog- nition of the extended net-work of sensory fibrils in the skin or muscles ; much less of the extended muscle or area of the skin. No copy in space-form of the various simultaneous or successive rubbings and stretchings of these peripheral fibrils is propagated to the brain ; and if it were, the mind could not be regarded as taking account of any of these neural processes. A further negative statement may be made with entire confidence. The place at which each organ of sense is found in the periphery of the body, or the place at which any such organ is acted on by the stimulus, cannot of itself furnish a reason for the spatial perception of such place and for distinguishing it from other places near or 1 See an article in Mind, by G. Stanley Hall, III. (1878), pp. 433 ff. PSYCHICAL NATURE OF SENSATIONS. 385 remote. To suppose this is virtually to return to an ancient, dis- carded theory ; it is to regard the mind as well diffused through the extended body, especially over its nervous periphery ; and as thus constantly sensing the condition of this periphery with respect to excitation, as well as the spatial relation of its various excited and non-excited parts. The locality where a stimulus is applied, except as this locality affects the mental coloring or qualitative shading of the sensations which result, is a matter of complete indifference to the mind. 3. In contrast to all theories like those just rejected, the fol- lowing positive affirmations are to be held firmly. Sensations, as the elements of so-called " presentations of sense " are psychical states whose place so far as they can be said to have one is the mind. The transference of these sensations from mere mental states to physical processes located in the periphery of the body, or to qualities of things projected in space external to the body, is a mental act. It may rather be said to be a mental achievement ; for it is an act which in its perfection results from a long and intricate process of development. The product of this act, the presentation of sense (or, considered objectively, the "thing" as known by the senses) has characteristics that do not belong to the simple sensa- tions out of which scientific experiment and theory show it to be composed. The presentation of sense has " space-form ; " it is ex- tended, and consists of an indefinite number of visible or tangible parts that are systematically arranged beside each other into a con- tinuous whole ; it is related with respect to position, magnitude, etc., to other similar objects of sense. Certain compound sensa- tions as, of light and color, of smoothness and hardness are not regarded merely as psychical acts whose cause lies in the extended object ; they are regarded as qualities of its surface, and appear to belong to it as forms of its objective being. Such a result, how- ever, must be regarded as brought about by the action of mind, in forms and according to laws of its own. The one characteristic which the presentations of sense possess, but which does not belong to the simple sensations that are their factors, is space-form. " Space-form " (whatever metaphysics may decide to be the nature, origin, and validity of our idea of space) must be regarded by psychology simply as the mental form of the presentations of sense. The problem which physiological psy- chology has to solve in this direction may then be stated as follows : On the basis of what combinations of physical processes of sense do the different resulting sensations come to be combined into presentations of sense under the new characteristic of space-form f 25 386 THE SYNTHESIS OF SENSATIONS. 4. The most complete answer possible to the question just raised is obliged to recognize the following particular truths : (1) A combination (or "synthesis," or " association ") of two or more qualitatively different series of sensations is ordinarily if not absolutely necessary in order that presentations of sense in space- form may be constructed. If our sense -perception were all by a single organ, or by a single activity of one organ, the objects of sense would largely, if not wholly, lose their present characteristics of position and extension in space. A series of sensations of one kind only, like the pure differences in pitch of musical tone, or of degrees of brightness and saturation of color-tone, or of pressure, temperature, or muscular innervation, is not adapted to form the material for constructing extended objects of sense. (2) The characteristic differences in quality of the sensations of some of the senses, and so their adaptability to form graded series, are such as to fit these sensations for combination with other simi- lar sensations into the presentations of sense under space-form ; the sensations of other senses have not these characteristic differences and this adaptability. We may then speak of peculiarly " spatial series " of sensations, 1 and of other series of sensations as non- spatial. By this term, however, it must not be understood that any sensations, as such (or quoad sensations), are extended in space, or can come by any process of theoretical manipulation to be en- dowed with extension. The sensations of smell are manifestly not fitted to form a so-called spatial series ; indeed, they are incapable of being arranged in any series at all. An experience consisting wholly of sensations of smell would have no elements from which to construct objects of sense. The same thing is true of pure sensations of taste and of sound. On the contrary, the various series of complex sensations that come through the eye and skin (including those of the mus- cular sense) are qualitatively adapted to enter into such relations to each other as shall give a ground in their combined existence for a perception of things. Accordingly the eye and skin are the so- called " geometrical senses." (3) The locally different parts of the organ of sense if this organ is itself to become known (as in the case of the skin), or if through its being stimulated at these parts an extended object out- side of the body is to be perceived (as in the case of both skin and 1 Comp. Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologie, II., pp. 36 ff. ; whose very interesting theory of the origin of space-intuitions can, how- ever, no more be pronounced wholly satisfactory than the similar theory of Bain. LOCALIZATION AND PROJECTION. 387 eye) must each have some mental representative in the sensations which stimulation of each calls forth. As places in material sub- stance, or as parts of the organism, in themselves, they have no im- mediate significance for the mind. But a psychological equivalent or representative they must have. To this principle is due the fact that those senses are not " geometrical senses " in which we cannot vary, largely at pleasure, the locality to which the stimulus is ap- plied. It is therefore assumed that every sensation, besides its general characteristic quality as sensation of this or that particular sense, must have a peculiar "local stamp," or shade, or mixture of quality, dependent upon the place of the organ at which the stimu- lus is applied ; otherwise such sensation cannot serve as a factor in the construction of an extended object of sense. Such peculiar local stamp, or shade, or mixture of quality is a so-called " local sign." It is to Lotze that we owe the first elaborate theory of " local signs," and of their relation to the formation of the presen- tations of sense. The theory, as he truly says, is an indispensable assumption of every satisfactory account of perception by the senses. ' In what, precisely, these so-called local signs consist has been dis- puted by those who agree in holding that the explanation of the facts requires the assumption. (4) Various stages in the process of elaborating the presenta- tions of sense from the material of simple sensations must be recog- nized. Thus the construction of a retinal field of vision is a less elaborate work, both of the mechanism and of the mind, than the construction of that more objective field in which real things are seen with solid forms and set at varying distances. So, too, the knowledge of the things we handle the fork, the tool, the pen stands at a farther remove from the simplest perceptions of touch than does the discrimination of one area at the surface of the body as warmer or under more pressure than the surrounding spots. Two noteworthy stages, or "epoch-making" achievements, in the process of elaborating the presentations of sense require a special consideration. These are "localization" or the transference of the composite sensations from mere states of the mind to processes or conditions recognized as taking place at more or less definite- ly fixed points or areas of the body ; and " eccentric projection " (sometimes called "eccentric perception "), or the giving to these sensations an objective existence (in the fullest sense of the word " objective ") as qualities of objects situated within a field of space and in contact with, or more or less remotely distant from, the body. The law of eccentric projection is generally stated thus : 1 Medicin. Psychologic, p. 331. 388 THE SYNTHESIS OF SENSATIONS. Objects are perceived in space as situated in a right line off the ends of the nerve-fibres which they irritate. (5) The entire process of elaborating the presentations of sense presupposes for its explanation a constant activity of the mind in reacting, with sensations of different kinds, upon the stimuli which produce various forms of molecular disturbance in the nervous system ; and, furthermore, its activity in combining the sensations into the more complex presentations of sense, according to modes of behavior that belong to its own nature, as mind. This combin- ing activity is best called "synthetic," l or constructive. It may, in- deed, always have a physical basis in some central organic combi- nation of the neural processes resulting from stimulating, simul- taneously or in the right succession, the different end-organs and areas of the end-organs of sense. About this, as a matter of scien- tific knowledge, we are almost wholly in the dark. On general grounds of our theory of the nervous mechanism we conjecture that it is so. But if this organic combination takes place in each instance as a physical basis for the psychical synthesis, the former does not do away with the latter. Obscure as the latter is, and doubtful as some of its elements and stages are, the former is more doubtful and obscure. 2 Nor is the fact that this synthetic activity takes place to be con- cealed by ascribing the product to the so-called " association " of sense-impressions and of ideas. Ideas and sensations are not enti- ties or real subjects of states ; they are only particular phenomena. They cannot associate themselves ; nor are they things which may be combined, after the analogy of material atoms, by the action upon them of neural conditions. The term " association," as ap- plied in all theories of sense-perception, is only an inadequate ex- pression for this same synthetic activity of the mind. 5. It follows, then, that an analysis of the presentations of sense leads us to find our explanation of certain primary facts and results 1 The word " synthesis " for this mental activity is employed and defended by Wundt (Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., pp. 28 f., 164 1, 177), who justly ob- jects to the word " association" and the theories which have used the word, because of their concealment of the truth that the process imparts new proper- ties to its product. He also calls attention (p. 175) to the fact that John Stuart Mill, a chief defender of the " association hypothesis," virtually admits the theory of a mental synthesis by using the term " psychical chemistry." 2 Yet E. Montgomery, in Mind, 1885, pp. 227 ff. and 377 ff., speaks as though the indubitable and clearly understood portion of the whole psycho- physical process were the neural and organic part ; and as though it were doubtful whether we have any right at all to refer the nature of the product to the nature of the subject whose product it is namely, to mind. NATIVISM AND EMPIRICISM. 389 in the nature of the Mind itself. Physiological psychology can do much toward giving a descriptive history of the process in which these complex products have their rise. It can point out the ele- ments which enter into the products both the more primary and the derived and can state the laws which regulate the process. But the forth-putting of these primary elements, and the modes of the activity which are called the laws of the process, must all in the last analysis be thought of as native to mind. It is in vain to object that to do this leaves the subject, ultimately, still shrouded in mys- tery. 1 As a matter of fact, the analysis of psycho-physical science does end in the recognition of ultimate mystery. This is no reproach to it ; nor is it a failure or fault peculiar to it alone. All physical science, even, is obliged to accept the same result from its keenest analyses most vigorously pushed. For physical science always has to admit into its explanations the unexplained mystery of elements of physical reality which behave in certain ways not simply be- cause they are thus or thus circumstanced, but also because when they are thus circumstanced it is their nature so to behave. 2 6. The foregoing remarks indicate what is the correct position toward the two rival theories as to the nature and origin of presen- tations of sense. These theories have been named the "nativistic" (or intuitional) and the " empiristic " by Helmholtz, 3 the "nativis- tic" and "genetic" by Wundt. 4 Properly speaking, they are not two fundamentally different theories, but rather two tendencies which appear in the attitude assumed by two classes of observers toward the admission of certain alleged facts, or in the manner of explaining such facts as are admitted by all. These different ten- dencies are largely due to differences of position on certain funda- mental philosophical questions, especially the question as to the reality and self-activity of Mind, which (however much the effort is made to avoid them) inevitably have their bearing upon the re- searches of physiological psychology. Thus influenced, the so- called "Nativistic School" is inclined to depreciate the explanations 1 Sully thinks it an objection to Wundt's view that it " burdens us with the mystery of what may be called a psychical form of spontaneous generation " (see Mind, 1878, p. 192). But it is one chief merit of Wundt that he frankly acknowledges the mystery and knows where to locate it. Doubtless he would rejoice with us all, if Sully, or any other investigator, could push analysis further. In the article just referred to (Mind, 1878, p. 184) Sully speaks of Lotze as "burdened with survivals of Herbart's metaphysics." We fail to see why any recognition of the reality and self-activity of mind should be considered as such a "burden" by certain English psychologists. ' 3 Physiolog. Optik, p. 435. 4 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 23. I 390 THE SYNTHESIS OF SENSATIONS. offered by the other school as to how and why the presentations of sense come to have the character they really bear ; the advocates of this school prefer to emphasize the intuitional and underived activ- ities of the mind. The so-called "Empiristic School," on the other hand, is inclined to give little or no place to the mind's native intuition ; it prefers to fill the gaps in the explanation as based on experiment, with probable conjecture and hypothesis. It often aims to show how what we call "mind," and popularly look upon as immediately con- scious of the reality of things by virtue of its native right and power, is itself rather the result of a genesis induced by the activity of things through the nervous system. The one school is inclined to look upon the space-form, which presentations of sense possess, as the mind's form, in some large sense native to it and not to be ex- plained as the result of a development. The other is inclined to look upon space-form as wholly a form which " things " have come to ac- quire, and which will be fully explained when science has described the empirical process by which solely this acquisition is gained for them. Inasmuch as the chief difficulties of a theory of perception have hitherto been found in accounting for the construction of visual space, the one party in the controversy has insisted, as a rule, on the native power of the mind in and through the retinal image di- rectly to intuit space of two, or even of three, dimensions ; the other has denied this power, and has laid great stress upon the necessity of motion, with its equipment of double images and of graded mus- cular and tactual sensations. 7. Certain principles adopted both by the empiristic and by the nativistic school have their undoubted rights ; and no satisfactory theory of sense-perception can be framed without admitting them. There can be no doubt that the presentations of sense which so largely constitute our every-day adult experience are not direct re- sults of untrained organic and mental activities ; they are not sim- ple intuitions dependent solely on the native and inherent powers of the mind. With whatever speed and certainty they are formed, and however the impression they make is characterized by a perfect " immediateness," they are really extremely complex products, in- volving not only the organic habit of the species and individual peculiarities of mind and body, but also the acquisitions of experi- ence through memory, attention, association, and so-called " instinc- tive inference." All this is as true of the picture of a single object when seen by instantaneous illumination, or of the unhesitating lo- calization of a burning or cutting pain in some area of the skin, as it is of the most deliberate judgment about the distance of a mountain. GENESIS OF SPATIAL QUALITIES. 391 On the other hand, however far the " empiricist " may succeed in resolving these " intuitions " of sense into more nearly prim- itive elements, and however minutely he may describe the processes and laws of their development, he will never succeed in withholding from the mind itself the ascription of all its so-called native powers. The elements (the simple sensations) reached by his most complete analysis must always be considered as reactions of the mind upon the stimulation of the nervous centres through the end-organs of sense ; they all imply a native disposition and ability of the subject of the sensations. The nature of the process in which what is sim- ple and homogeneous becomes complex and heterogeneous, and ac- quires the added characteristics of so-called space-form, can never be regarded otherwise than as due to the constructive and synthetic action of the mind. And both theories must alike admit that the nature of the elements and of the synthetic process is conditioned at every step upon the action of the central nervous mechanism as sensitive and excited through stimulation of the end-organs of sense. The only satisfactory course in considering this subject of per- ception by the senses is, therefore, perfectly obvious. The differ- ent simple sensations which enter as elements into the presentations of sense, the method and laws of their combination, the correlations of mind and nervous mechanism involved in the process, must all be pointed out as fully as the present condition of psycho-physical science will admit. But the existence of unexplained mysteries, the fact that original and underived activities of the mind are necessarily assumed, the truth that the entire complex process is to be ascribed however occasioned or conditioned to the mind, must also be admitted. Especially must we avoid all attempts, whether avowed or concealed, to account for the spatial qualities of the presentations of sense by merely describing the qualities of the simple sensations and the modes of their combination. .It is position and extension in space which constitutes the very pecu- liarity of the objects as no longer mere sensations or affections of the mind. As sensations, they are neither out of ourselves nor possessed of the qualities indicated by the word " spread-out" As objects of sense, they are both out and " spread-out." No manip- ulation of their mental qualities and values can fully explain how it is that when combined they acquire the new peculiarity of their space-form. If it should be found that any system of simple sen- sations is probably originally given as localized, it would be neces- sary to acknowledge this, too, as an inexplicable matter of fact. Science cannot explain, from previous experience, an event in ex- 392 NATURE OF SPATIAL SERIES. perieDce which is so fundamental as this. Such an event consti- tutes an unsolvable datum of nature, so to speak. And if the fur- ther question be asked, Of the nature of what ? the only possible answer must be, Of the nature of the subject of the experience, of the Mind. 8. Before proceeding to illustrate and confirm in detail the five principles already laid down, several questions raised by the mere statement of these principles require an answer. And first : What are those characteristic differences in quality which the sen- sations belonging to some of the senses possess, and which adapts them to combine into presentations of sense under space-form ? In other words, what kinds of sensations are fitted to constitute a so-called " spatial series f " Plainly, it is not necessary that those elements of the complex objects of sense, which make the objects appear to be composed of parts set together side by side, should themselves be immediately known as side by side. The mosaic of nervous elements (rods and cones) set side by side in the ninth layer of the retina is a physical pre-condition of the extended visual object which the mind has when the retina is excited. According as the irritation spreads over this mosaic the extent and shape of the object are determined. But the extension of the object is not a copy of the extension of the retinal nerve-expanse with its minute parts set side by side. For example, the object under ordinary circumstances has no gap corresponding to the blind-spot ; and the nervous elements, on whose excitement the appearance of the extended object depends, belong to the retinas of two eyes, and are therefore not side by side at the periphery ; nor do histology and physiology warrant us in assuming that the elements in the brain corresponding to the retinal elements are set exactly side by side there. Moreover, the different parts of the object appear side by side as the result of motion of both eyes with its resulting mus- cular and tactual sensations. The nervous elements whose irrita- tion induces these latter sensations are not locally contiguous to the elements of the retina whose excitation produces the sensations of light and color ; yet the two kinds of sensations combine to form one extended object. In brief, we have no reason to assume that any two. kinds of sen- sations require, in order to combine into one object, that the excited nervous elements which form the physical bases of them both should be set precisely side by side in the brain. If they were we may ask what good would it do ? if they were not, what harm ? Let the locally different sensation-elements of the light-and-color series be represented by a, 6, c, d, etc. ; and those of the muscular REPETITION OF LIKE SENSATIONS. 393 and tactual series by a, j3, y, 8, etc. How shall we arrange the two series so as to form within the brain a physical basis for one object with its parts all set in visible spatial order ? Shall this be accom- plished by interpolating one of the latter series between every ad- joining pair of the former series thus a, a. ; b, /? ; c, y ; etc. ? What is really necessary is that both series of sensations, if they are to be combined into one presentation of sense, shall be capable of clearly and reciprocally determining each other as series of sensations. They must both have, that is to say, the common qualities and mutual relations of a " spatial series." 1 9. Of the qualities which characterize spatial series the following are the most important : Series of sensations of like quality, which are adapted to combine into extended objects of sense, must admit of easy, rapid, and frequent repetition in varying order of arrange- ment. An order of sensations in time, however varied and fre- quently repeated, can never of itself account for an order of parts in an extended object set side by side in space. But the character of the ordering possible for the simple sensations does determine whether or not they can become elements of such an object. If a portion of the body be moved, as, for example, a finger, an arm, a leg, or the bending of the back a graded series of sensations, due to the varying quality and quantity of strain upon the different muscles, joints, etc., is the result. This series is composed of indi- vidual compound sensations that shade into each other with no apparent interruption, each of them having a certain value and position in consciousness. In adult experience the series is rapidly concluded, and instantaneously interpreted as a whole. The indi- vidual members of the series are then scarcely, or not at all, distin- guished in consciousness ; that is, as sensations, many of them largely or wholly drop out. But they may be reproduced in a measure by slowly moving a limb in any direction, and endeavoring to pay strict and exclusive attention to the succession of feelings which results. Every motion of each limb, from about the same position a to about the same position m, relative to the whole body, with similar energy, speed, and other concomitant circumstances, yields a nearly iden- tical series of sensations (a, /?, y, . . . /A). Other motions of dif- ferent limbs, or differing otherwise (in energy, speed, point of start- ing or of conclusion, etc.), yield series differing in the value and or- dering of their individual members. What is true of the muscular sensations that result from the movement of the limbs is also true of the accompanying sensations of the skin, such as arise from 1 On this subject comp. the remarks of Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologic, II. , pp. 36 ff . 394 NATURE OF SPATIAL SERIES. changes in its tension, etc. These sensations, however, largely blend with the series of muscular sensations so as to be nearly or quite inseparable in consciousness. The same thing also holds good of the series of tactual sensations (sensations of light pressure or touch proper) developed by moving an object over the skin, or by moving a tactile organ (especially the hand) over an object at rest. The muscular and tactual sensations which result from mo- tion of the eye have the qualities of a graded spatial series. Accordingly, senses like those of the eye and hand, which have organs capable of rapid and precise motion, are equipped with a peripheral mechanism adapted to the production of so-called spa- tial series of sensations. The succession of sensations of light and color which accompany the movement of an object in the field of vision, or of the glance from one object to another, are also of the kind favorable to forming a spatial series. Slight changes of color- tone and brightness, as the different parts of the surface of the same object come successively in review, or more abrupt changes on transition from one object to another, characterize the effect of such movement. In all these cases the rate of the sensations is important. Either too slow or too rapid movement of the organ will not yield a spatial series of sensations. Moreover, such series are capable of repetition, not only forward, as a, /J, y, 8, . . . ^, or in inverse order, as /*, X, *, . . . /?, a, but also in an endless variety as an intersecting net-work of sensations. 10. It has been claimed that all the foregoing qualifications belong to musical tones, and yet hearing is not a "geometrical sense." In reply, it must be admitted that the foregoing are not the only qualifications possessed by sensations of spatial series. Yet in regard to these qualifications alone, the sensations of hear- ing bear no comparison with those of the eye, skin, and muscles. Few persons have more than a very imperfect and infrequent expe- rience with series of musical tones. Such series, when arising in consciousness, ordinarily have little variety, and are rarely or never repeated in changed order of arrangement with a recognized quali- tative value to the members of the different series. Few persons have heard frequently more than half a score of tunes ; fewer still have had any considerable number of the notes composing the strains of these tunes repeated in recognizably inverted or other- wise varied order. Most of our experience with sounds is that of sudden shocks of noise which occur to interrupt the continuous flow, as it were, of sensations of the eye, muscle, and skin. In close connection with the foregoing stands also the fact that the ear is not, like the eye and the hand, a movable organ ; nor is ASSOCIATION OF SENSATIONS. 395 the irritation which its nervous elements experience graded accord- ing to the varying extent of the surface affected, except as the noise becomes so loud or acute as to occasion decided forms of muscular sensation and of common feeling. Compared with the almost un- ceasing call made for attention to sensations of sight and touch, the experience of men with sensations of musical sound (the only sen- sations of hearing which easily admit of being arranged in any sort of a graded series) seems meagre and trivial indeed. Music is, therefore, of the nature of an indirect recreative and aesthetic ac- quaintance with things, rather than of a necessary direct and practi- cal acquaintance with them. 11. The second class of qualifications which must be possessed by a spatial series of sensations secures their habitual combination with other series, also of a spatial kind. They must be in nature comparable and associab/e with each other, and, in fact, simultane- ously experienced by the mind. In singing a musical scale a series of sounds is accompanied by another series of muscular and tactual sensations occasioned by the use of the vocal organs ; both series may be produced in inverse order by singing the same scale back- ward. 1 Yet these two simultaneous series of qualitatively differ- ent sensations do not combine into a succession of extended objects of sense. For this fact there are several obvious reasons. Of the three principal kinds of sensations involved namely, sensations of musical sound, sensations localized in the organs with which the sounds are executed, and sensations localized in or near the organs with which the sounds are heard only the last two belong to spatial series. The first of the three, however, is not a spatial series. It has not been accustomed to give us direct knowledge of any part of our own body ; nor does it combine with either of the other two so as to form an object of sense. We know, indeed, not only that we are singing the scale with the vocal organs, but also that we are at the same time hearing it with the ear. We know both these facts, however, through sensations of muscle and skin that have already become inseparably associated and localized in our own body. On the contrary, from the dawn of consciousness onward through all the development of experience, series of sensations of light and color are constantly accompanied by, and combined with, other se- ries of tactual and muscular sensations of the eye. So, too, the different series of sensations that arise from the irritation of the nerves in muscle and skin are, of necessity, habitually combined. In forming the field of touch, the fact that certain parts of the pe- riphery of the body so frequently come into contact with other parts 1 Comp. Lotze, Medicin. Psychologie, p. 382 f. 396 NATURE OF SPATIAL SERIES. is of the highest significance. Two series of complex sensations, corresponding to the terms "touching" and "being touched," are thus brought into juxtaposition, as it were, in consciousness. This "juxtaposition" in consciousness is not itself, of course, a spatial juxtaposition ; the former is, however, the necessary pre-condition of the latter. 12. The third characteristic of the spatial series of sensations is the possession of a system of local signs. By a " local sign " we understand that peculiar shading or mixture of quality which be- longs to sensations, otherwise qualitatively similar, on account of the locality of the organ at which the stimulus is applied. Further as to their nature and origin it is not easy to give a satisfactory account. While accepting the general theory of Lotze as to the existence of such local signs, his more specific view as to what they are must be held subject to doubts. The local signs of sight Lotze conceived of in the following way. 1 In addition to the same sensation (for example, red, r) which each color produces at all places of the retina, it produces also an accessory impression a, /?, y, etc., for each of its different places a, b, or c, etc. The existence of such accessory data must be assumed, or the spatial differences and relations among the retinal impressions could not be " compen- sated for " by corresponding non-spatial and merely intensive rela- tions among the impressions in the soul. We can only conjecture, however, in what the accessory impres- sions consist. Lotze's conjecture is that, since we involuntarily and by reflex motion of the eye fixate its most sensitive spot upon every especially luminous point, and in order to do this must rotate the eye through an arc PE, or RE, etc., according to the position from which it takes its start in the fixation of E, a great number of series of changing "feelings of position " are developed corresponding to each arc (thus, TTC, pe, etc.). When, then, both P and R are simultaneously stimulated, although with equal intensity and so that actual rotation of the eye cannot take place over both of the opposed arcs PE and RE, the stimulation of P and R repro- duces the series of feelings of position belonging to each (respec- tively, Tre and pe). Thus there comes to be connected with every excitation of the places P and R the mental presentation of the magnitude and qualitative peculiarity of a series of changes which consciousness " would have to experience in order that these exci- 1 The most mature expression of Lotze s theory is to be found in Outlines of Psychology, Boston, 1886, p. 51 f.; and Metaphysik, Leipzig, 1884, in., chap. 4; the earlier, in Medicin. Psychologic, Book ii., chap. 4; and article, Seele u. Seelenleben, Wagner's Handworterb. d. Physiol., 1850, III., 1. Abth. LOCAL SIGNS OF THE SKIN. 397 tations might fall upon the place of clearest vision." The physical basis for this is to be found in the cerebral connection between the sensory and the motor nerves ; it is the excitation of the latter at their central endings which gives to every color-impression its local character. 1 The local sign of sight is, then, a kind of feeling of ten- dency to motion, mentally reproduced out of the associated series of impressions that have previously accompanied the movement of the eye in fixation from one position to another. The sign consists in awakening definite "motor tendencies,"* or, rather, "associated feelings of movement." 3 Various objections to Lotze's hypothesis may be brought forward. To speak of "accessory" or "adjunct" impressions as attaching themselves to the chief impressions of color-tone seems unfortu- nate. Indeed, Lotze himself conceives of them rather as blending in one mixture of feeling with the principal sensation. The color- tone itself does indeed change with the position upon the retina where the stimulus falls. 4 But the change is always a change into another color-tone, which is, so far as it is color-tone at all, capable of reproduction at any one of innumerable other points of the retina. The question then recurs as to the origin and nature of the individual members of the series of original so-called " feelings of position " (TT to e, or p to e). Are they feelings which arise from the changing condition of the muscles of the eye, or of the skin surrounding the eyeball, when the eye is in motion ? Or are they specific shades of feeling which naturally belong to each of the nervous elements of the retina, and which are awakened by stimu- lating these points without any dependence on the motion of the eye? 13. Several views are possible as to the nature of the local signs of the skin. It may be held that they are not qualitative differences at all, but differences in the intensity and time -course of the tactual sensations. Von Kries and Auerbach, 5 however, have shown that locality on the skin is much more quickly discriminated than even considerable differences in the quantity of sensations. We can tell the point where we are touched easier than the point where the amount of pressure is increased. Again, it may be held that the local signs of touch are qualitative differences of sensation de- 1 Medicin. Psychologie, p. 360. 2 So in the earlier view, Medicin. Psychologie, p. 340. 3 Comp. Sully, in Mind, 1878, p. 181 f . 4 Bain makes the odd mistake of supposing that "both Lotze and Wundt re- gard this series of changes in color-tone as constituting the local signs of vi- sion. The Senses and the Intellect, p. 397 f . (note). New York, 1879. 6 Ajrchiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1877, p. 351 f. 398 NATURE OF SPATIAL SERIES. pendent upon the modifications which the stimulus undergoes on account of the changing character of the skin with respect to ten- sion, nature of the substance of muscle, tendon, and bone over which it is stretched, etc. But experiment shows that stimulation of the skin by electricity, and in such a way that these influences could have no appreciable effect, is immediately localized. Finally, it may also be held that the local signs of the skin are qualitative differences of sensation peculiar to the different nervous elements existing in different parts of this organ of sense. They are the direct result, that is, of the mind's reaction upon the specific energies of the nervous elements as called out by the stimulus. This is, of course, to fall back upon the ultimate mystery involved in the original nature of that reaction which the mind makes as dependent upon the locally individual nervous elements being stimulated. It is to surrender explanation at this point, and accept what takes place as mere datum of fact. 14. In view of all the evidence, it would seem that the general theory of local signs must be constructed in somewhat the follow- ing way : Within certain limits, which it is impossible for science as yet definitely to fix, the irritation of the different nervous ele- ments of certain organs of sense gives rise to sensations which dif- fer in the shading of their quality according to the locality in the organ at which the elements are situated. This is probably true of both peripheral and central areas of the total organ. It is true of the latter areas as dependent on the excitation of the former. The simultaneous irritation of several locally related elements of the organ (and the irritation is seldom or never confined to a single element) results, then, in a certain mixture of feeling dependent upon the number and local relation of all the elements thus simul- taneously irritated. For example, the color-tone of the complex sensations aroused by irritating together the retinal elements a, ft, y, S, etc., differs from that aroused by irritating the elements y, 8, , , etc. The same thing holds true of locally related nervous elements of the skin. How much of the local coloring is due, on the phys- iological side, to differences in structure and how much to dif- ferences in processes, how much to peripheral elements and how much to central nervous connections, it is impossible to say. Each of the spatial series of sensations is characterized by this shading of its elements. We must, therefore, hold that every sense which is the medium of space-perceptions has a system of local signs of its own. ' The theory is thus opposed to that of Bain 2 and others of 1 Comp. Funke, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 408 f. 8 The Senses and the Intellect, pp. 73 ff., 348 ff. New York, 1879. LOCAL MIXTURES OF FEELING. 399 the Association school, who are inclined wholly or largely to reduce all the local signs to mere symbols of associated differences in the muscular sense. They are thus made to become mere signs of signs of "Things." Not only each "geometrical sense," but also each of the "spatial series" of sensations arising through the total operation of that sense, consists of members that have a local coloring peculiar to the series. Thus the spatial series of tactual impressions pro- duced by moving an object from a to d on the hand differs from that produced by moving it from a to n ; that belonging to move- ment from a to d on the hand from that belonging to movement from mtox on the back. The series of muscular sensations de- veloped by raising one pound differs, with respect to the color-tone of its members, from that developed by raising two pounds, with the hand ; both differ from the series belonging to the raising of the same weights with the foot. Every series of muscular and tactual sensations produced by moving the eye also depends upon the direction and amount of its motion ; the series of local signs of the retina depends upon the direction and amount of the motion of the object over the retinal field. But another important consideration remains. The local signs of the different spatial series which frequently combine in the opera- tion of the same organ must necessarily modify each other. Hence there arise admixtures of feeling dependent upon the combined specific energies of the nervous elements simultaneously excited, with a given amount of energy and with given relations to preced- ing conditions. Thus it comes about that the place where we locate a visual object does not depend merely upon the place where its image falls on the retina, but also on the feeling of the position of the eye as indicated by its muscular and tactual local signs. In other words, the real and complete " local sign " (that which signifies the locality of the object to the mind, as it were) is the whole complex of feeling which is combined from the local signs of the different spatial series that are acting together. We define the local sign, then, as that mixture of feeling which gives to the sensation its peculiar coloring, and is dependent upon the combined result of exciting the nerves of a given locality of the organ. 15. It may be objected that the foregoing theory of local signs is too elaborate and artificial to be in fact true. But the nervous elements themselves are indescribably numerous and varied ; and so is, without doubt, the total complex of feelings which results from their activity. Reflective consciousness finds itself baffled in its effort to catch and fix, for purposes of analysis, all the various 400 NATURE OF SPATIAL SERIES. shadings of sensations which actually appear in adult life. Yet it is characteristic of this adult life that its very development presup- poses the loss from consciousness of many discriminations of shades of feeling on which the development is itself based. The adult does not, and cannot, recall the complex of sensations by which he learned to talk ; nor can the skilful player of the violin reproduce the " tact " with which he experimented among the innumerable muscular and tactual sensations concerned in producing a required musical tone. Let anyone, however, who imagines that the limit can be easily fixed for the peculiar shadings which sensations ordinarily classed together really possess, spend a half-hour, with one hand lying motionless across the other, in the endeavor to pick out all the different color-tones of tactual feeling which he can localize in both hands. The dependence of even developed experience upon these local signs in consciousness, for its apparently instinctive localization of sensation, may be faintly manifested by various experiments. Select two portions of the body that are in structure and function most nearly identical, and whose local signs will accordingly be such mixtures of feeling as, when brought into consciousness, will be most difficult to keep separate. The corresponding points on the tips of the two middle fingers, perhaps, fulfil these con- ditions best. With closed eyes rub these points gently together, concentrating the attention, as much as possible, solely upon the sensations thus produced. The tactual sensations may thus be made to fluctuate in locality from one finger to the other ; at times they appear almost to lose their objective character, and to resemble musical tones heard without consciousness of the direction from which they come, or of the extent and locality of the bodily affec- tion through which they come. A similar nearly complete detach- ment of sensations of light and color may be secured by closing the eyes, letting all after-images die away, suppressing the tendencies to motion of the organ, and directing attention, as much as pos- sible, solely to the quality of our affection. Color seems then to be felt (but nowhere in particular), rather than seen as localized in space-form. 16. The most noteworthy stages, or " epoch-making " achieve- ments, in the process of elaborating the presentations of sense, have been declared to be "localization " and "eccentric projection." The first, primarily, gives us the knowledge of our own body, mainly by passive sensations of touch ; the knowledge of our own body which comes through sight is by eccentric projection. We immediately feel the peripheral parts of the body as the places where the sensa- TOUCHING AND BEING TOUCH tions are localized ; we see some of the same parts as projected in space before our eyes. Objects that are not a part of ourselves are given to us as projected eccentrically, either by touch through their being in contact with the skin and occasioning sensations of mus- cular exertion, or by sight as having distance in its field of vision. Localization and projection are not to be regarded as two phases of one and the same process ; we do not first have the presentations of sense as parts of the periphery of our bodies, and then, on further experience, push them beyond this periphery, either to an infini- tesimal distance or to one remote. Localization and eccentric pro- jection are rather two processes, largely unlike, which go on con- temporaneously and are set up chiefly on the basis of different classes of sensations. Where two parts of the sensitive skin of our own bodies come together the conditions for both of the above-mentioned processes are fulfilled. Accordingly, one part has localized in it those com- plex sensations which make us aware that this part of our body is touching something ; the other has localized in it those sensations which make us aware that this part is being touched by something. Which of the two parts shall be regarded as touching, and which as being touched, depends on various considerations. Those mem- bers of the body which are most used in active touch are generally known as touching, and the less active parts as being touched. For example, if with closed eyes the forehead be moved across the sta- tionary tip of a finger, the latter will appear to be the active organ of touch. Comparatively insensitive areas of the skin are less likely to be presented to the mind as touching other more sensitive parts ; callous spots, indurated surfaces, etc., seem, as a rule, to be touched. Parts of the body which lose all sensitiveness come to be regarded as external things. If the tip of a finger of normal sensitiveness be brought into contact with the callous tip of the corresponding fin- ger of the other hand, the former will be known as touching and the latter as being touched. The direction of attention often deter- mines the strife, as it were, between the motifs to localization and those to eccentric projection. We ordinarily strive to gain knowl- edge of the qualities of some outside object, rather than of the con- dition of our own periphery with respect to the sensations localized in it ; the attention is therefore directed to those series of sensations which form the basis of eccentric projection, even when some part of our own sensitive organism is the object known. But sensations which are accompanied by obtrusive feeling of some kind furnish superior grounds for localization. We locate pains, pricks, severe pressure, sensations of creeping, and tickling, in the body. In gen* 26 402 PERCEPTIONS OP THE LOWER SENSES. eral, then, a strong tone of feeling with the sensation favors the process of localizing ; tonelessness of sensation favors the process of objectifying. ' A system of localized sensations, gained chiefly by pressure of the skin and muscles, and accompanied by a strong tone of feeling, gives us the primary field of the body as known to touch. Certain points of starting, as it were, must first be fixed in the process of localizing ; this process then goes on by relating all other localized sensations to these points of starting. But by eccentric projection, the system of muscular sensations of movement and the system of visual sensations are combined to develop our perceptions of ob- jective space with its three dimensions. The sensations of touch are subsequently projected into a space thus originally constituted by combined muscular sensations and visual sensations. The eye and hand in motion, therefore, project their extended objects into a space which they develop themselves ; while the ear and the nose project their perceptions into a space which they are compelled to assume on the authority of the other senses. The foregoing principles must now be illustrated and confirmed by a brief statement of facts which relate to the formation and de- velopment of presentations of sense by a synthesis of simple sen- sations. Attention will, for obvious reasons, be directed almost exclusively to those presentations of sense which come through the eye and skin, including in both the influence of muscular sensa- tions. 17. Perceptions of Smell differ only in fineness, duration, and ac- companying tone of feeling ; they have no size or shape, no spatial properties of any kind. They cannot even be said to be localized. Fineness of smell, or power to make minute distinctions in quality, and so infer the presence or direction of an object previously known to excite such quality of sensations, differs greatly in different spe- cies of animals and in different individuals of the same species. The exploits of some animals give ground for the conjecture that every species, and even every individual, has an odor of its own. 2 The direction and nature of the object which causes the sensations are judged by variations of intensity on turning the head, or on approaching or receding from the object. Sensations of smell are known to come through the nose, by localizing there the accom- 1 Compare Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrbuch der Psychologic, II. , p. 126 f. 2 See the articles of Donhoff, in Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc., Physiolog. Abth , p. 7501 (1874) ; and Jager, in Zeitschr. f. wissensch. Zool., xxvii., p. 319 f. (1876). TASTE AND HEAEING. 403 panying muscular and tactual sensations with their strong tone of feeling. This is readily done, since we draw the air through the nostrils and feel its double effects in producing the two classes of sensations. As to the simultaneous influence of two smells, little is known beyond the statement of Valentin, that the stronger overwhelms the weaker. The power of discrimination may, of course, be cultivated in this sense as in every other. 1 18. Most of the remarks just made as to perceptions of smell apply also to Perceptions of Taste. Sensations of taste, however, are much more closely connected with those of touch ; since the tongue is a chief organ of active touch. It is the tactual and muscular sensations, and not the purely qualitative affections of taste, which are localized in the mouth. Concerning contrast and compensation of tastes, little is known which does not belong to ordinary experi- ence. Valentin 2 alleges that when a sour mass is laid on one half, and a bitter mass on the other half, of the root of the tongue, the predominating taste may sometimes be determined by our choice. It is well known that certain tastes compensate each other, as it were, in experience, without any chemical equivalence of their prop- erties. The sugar neutralizes the acid of the lemonade, not in the vessel that contains the mixture, but in the nervous system of him who drinks it. Brticke holds 3 that the neutralizing of one sensa- tion of taste by the other takes place in the brain. The sensation of bitter is especially difficult to cover or neutralize. 19. Perceptions of Hearing next demand consideration. More difficulty accompanies the effort to establish the proposition that sensations of sound are not directly localized, but are projected in a space constituted chiefly by the eye and the hand, through complicated indirect inferences. Such a proposition is, however, undoubtedly true. The localizing of the area of the body which serves as the organ of the sensations of sound, the knowledge that we hear with the ear, is accomplished chiefly through those sen- sations of shock to the muscles and skin of the region which come from loud and massive or piercing sounds. Sensations of sound originating through excitement within or very near to the ear itself are called "entotic." A great part of such sounds, if not all of them, are transmitted through the tympanum. Perceptions combined of such sensations may be located either within the ear or at some dis- 1 On the whole subject see von Vintschgau's monograph in Hermann, Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., pp. 225 ff. 2 Lehrbuch der Physiol. d. Menschen, etc., Abth. ii., p. 308 (second edi- tion). 3 Vorlesungen iiber Physiol. (ed. 1884), ii., p. 262. 404 PERCEPTIONS OF THE LOWER SENSES. tance from the body, according to previous associations and oppor- tunities for judgment. The sound produced by the vibration of the adjoining muscles, and heard as a low musical tone when the fin- gers are pressed in the ears (especially if the teeth are tightly set together), is located in the head by the help of its accompanying sensations of other kinds. The same thing is true of the crackling noise sometimes produced by yawning, or of the whirring occasioned by the passing of the blood through the neighboring large blood- vessels. In the same way we learn to hear the beating of our own hearts, or the noise of air in our respiration. But the click of the valves of the internal organ may, when experience gained through tactual and muscular sensation fails us, be located in the watch under our pillow; just as the singing or ringing "in the ears" produced by quinine, or cerebral excitement otherwise occasioned, may be located in a cricket supposed to be upon the sill of the open window. In certain pathological cases the power to distinguish between entotic sounds and those having an external origin is al- most wholly lost. 20. We can orientate ourselves in space with reference to ex- ternal sounds with great speed and considerable precision, but as an acquired art differing in different individuals and dependent upon attention and previous experience. E. H. Weber thought that we tell the direction of sounds by the help of the feeling of the swing of the ear-drum ; and instanced, in proof, that this eccentric projection is hindered by filling the external passage of the ear with water. When using both ears and moving the head freely in space, we undoubtedly determine the direction of sounds by differences in the intensity of the sensation dependent upon changes in the relative position of both ears. Kayleigh l found that, in a quiet place under favorable circumstances, the direction of a word or letter uttered in a natural voice could be given with considerable accuracy ; that of a musical tone much less accurately. The direction of a sound from a tuning-fork could not be given when it was held either behind or before, but could be given if the fork was held to the right or to the left. It is said that the conducting of an intermitting current from a tele- phone through both ears causes a perception of tone localized in the median plane of the head. Such facts as the foregoing introduce us to the theory of "acous- tic shadows," or of the amount of " covering " power which the sound produced by the waves of a given intensity entering one ear would have upon the sound produced by waves of a different 1 Nature, XIV., p. 32. THE EXPERIMENTS OF WEBEK. 405 intensity entering the other ear. It does not appear to Hensen, 1 however, that the prompt and accurate localization of direction possible to some ears can be wholly accounted for by the theory of acoustic shadows. Some other form of feeling, possibly connected with the remarkable arrangement of the semicircular canals, may blend with the estimate of differences in intensity to form a basis for judgment. Von Kries and Auerbach found that the promptness with which the direction of the noise from an electric spark can be localized depends upon its relation to the circuit of the head. 2 Our perceptions of the absolute distance of sounding objects are entirely dependent upon our knowledge of the quality and quantity of the sounds ordinarily proceeding from them ; they are, that is to say, not presentations of sense, but indirect estimates as to the objective cause of -the sensations immediately experienced. It has been claimed that a change in the relation of the partial tones to the fundamental tone, dependent upon the remoteness of the place of origin of the compound clang, aids our estimate of distance by sound. 21. An account of the process by which a Field of Touch is con- structed, and extended objects are known as in contact with the skin at definite points or areas of it, must begin by enumerating the data which the mind has for such activity. The most important of these data are indicated by certain facts as to the fineness of the so-called " sense of locality " belonging to the skin. E. H. Weber first established a rule for measuring the degree of this fineness ac- curately ; he also mapped out the entire field of the surface of the body into areas differing greatly in their fineness. s For a measur- ing instrument he used the two points of a pair of dividers, blunted so as to prevent the sensation of being pricked ; the principle of measurement was that the minimum distance apart at which the two points, when touching the skin of any region, are felt as two local- ized sensations is the measure of the sensitiveness to local distinction of that region. The following table gives some of the results of Weber's experiments; the figures indicate the number of milli- meters * apart which the points of the dividers were when the given area of the organ was just able to distinguish them : 1 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 136. 2 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1877, p. 331 f. 3 Annot. Anatom., vii., p. 4 f. ; Wagner's Handworterb. d. Physiol., III., Abth. ii., p. 529 f. 4 The numbers were given by Weber in Parisian lines ; in the table they are taken from Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii. , p. 7, who has reduced them to even millimeters. 406 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. Tip of the tongue 1 Volar side of the last phalanx of the finger 2 Red part of the lips 5 Volar side of the second and dorsal side of the third phalanx of the finger . 7 White of the lips, and metacarpus of the thumb 9 Cheek, and plantar side of the last phalanx of the great-toe 11 Dorsal side of the first phalanx of the finger 16 Skin on the back part of cheek-bone, and forehead 23 Back of the hand 31 Knee-pan, and surrounding region 36 Forearm, lower leg, back of the foot near the toes 40 Skin of the nape, and of the back in the five upper cervical vertebrae 54 Skin of the middle of the back, and of the upper arm and leg 68 Weber also found that the fineness of the sense of locality is greater in a transverse than in a longitudinal direction, on both arms and legs. On these surfaces of the skin the " sensation-circles," or areas within which the minimum distances of the dividers' points are felt as two points, have an elliptical shape, with their long axes up and down. That the size of the sensation-circles, or the fineness of the sense of locality, largely forms the basis for our judgments of the position, number, and magnitude of the localized sensations in the field of touch may be shown by a simple experiment. If the points of the dividers be separated somewhat less than is neces- sary in order to distinguish them as two on the cheek just in front of the ear, and then (the distance apart of the points remaining un- changed) be slowly moved until one point rests upon the upper and the other upon the lower lip, to a person blindfold, and unpreju- diced by knowing what is to take place, the point first felt as one will appear to become two, and then the two recede from each other continually as the parts with a finer sense of locality are trav- ersed. The same experiment may be tried upon any other part of the body. It appears, therefore, that the mental representation of the magnitude of the distance between two impressions varies in inverse proportion to the real magnitude of the smallest perceiv- able distance, on any given area of the skin. The same principle holds good when all the space between the impressions is filled up, as it were, so as to make a continuum of localized sensations. Thus Weber found that the circular form of a tube of only 1| Parisian line in diameter could be recognized by pressure on the tip of the tongue ; while on the skin of the abdomen the diameter of the tube must reach 3f inch before its form was recognizable. Our estimate of the length of lines of pressure marked out by laying rods upon the skin follows the same principle. 22. Other important discoveries as to the skin's so-called NATUKE OF SENSATION-CIRCLES. 407 " sense of locality " have been made since those of Weber. Valen- tin has called attention to the fact that enormous individual differ- ences exist in the fineness of this kind of perception ; some per- sons are not more than one-fourth as sensitive as are some others. The relative degree of fineness belonging to different areas of the skin remains, however, approximately the same in different persons. A. W. Volkmann 1 showed the remarkable effect of exercise upon the cultivation of the sense of locality. After fixing the value of the least perceivable differences of locality for a number of small areas in the field of touch, Volkmann found that each successive series of experiments with each area increased its fineness of perception, until within a few hours twice the original degree of fineness could be reached. The growth in perceptive skill of the skin was slower at first for areas not ordinarily used for touch ; quicker for those accustomed to daily use. The improvement ceased at a certain limit, and was soon lost by disuse, so that a few months out of practice served to reduce the acquired tact of any area to its origi- nal condition. A most surprising discovery of this experimenter was, that the practice exclusively of a member of the body on one side resulted in improving the fineness of touch of the correspond- ing member of the other side. Thus, if the smallest perceivable distance for the tip of a left finger was, to begin with, 0.75 line, and that of the corresponding place on the right finger, 0.85, prac- tice with the left finger exclusively reduced the distance for both fingers for the left to 0.45 line, and for the right to 0.4. It is well known that the blind, who have no spatial series of sensations or presentations of extended objects by the eye, attain by exercise a high degree of fineness for certain space-perceptions of the skin. 2 In the case of those who have sight, the most movable and discriminating organs of the skin such as the tips of the fin- gers are capable of being cultivated to great delicacy of touch ; but Funke 3 did not succeed, even by an education lasting an en- tire month, in reducing the obtuseness of the skin of the back be- tween the shoulder-blades and in the lumbar region more than by about one-fourth. 23. The explanation of Weber's " sensation-circles " of the skin has been the subject of much debate. It is natural at first to as- sume that each entire circle is provided with one and only one nerve-fibre, whose terminal expansion covers the circle, and whose excitation is represented in consciousness by a sensation of a spe- 1 Berichte d. Sachsischen Gesellschaft d. Wissenschaften, 1858, p. 38 f. 2 Comp. Czermak, Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., XVII., Abth. ii., p. 563 f. a See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 382. 408 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. cific value. Doubtless certain anatomical differences in the nerve- fibres of the skin, and certain corresponding physiological differ- ences in their function, must be assumed as the basis of every the- ory to account for the skin's sense of locality. But Gold sch eider's experiments show that a number of pressure-spots must be recog- nized within each sensation-circle, and each pressure-spot at least should have a sensory fibre. Moreover, every point within each sensation-circle is itself sensitive (however large the circle may be), and the limits of none of the circles are fixed as would be the ex- panse of a single nerve-fibre distributed over them. Still further, different individuals differ greatly in the size of these circles (and we cannot well suppose a corresponding difference in the number of sensory nerves of the skin), and practice suddenly and greatly diminishes the area covered by a single circle. It must at least be admitted that " the smallest perceivable distance is not a direct measure for the diameter of the sensation-circle." * Weber himself assumed that sensation-circles always contain a number of isolated nerve-fibres ; and that, in order to have the im- pression of two localized sensations, several unexcited fibres must exist between the two excited. The number of these unexcited fibres serves the mind as a kind of means for the approximate measure- ment of distances on the skin. Other advocates of Weber's ex- planation have spoken as though the brain could somehow become conscious of the unexcited fibres lying between the two excited ones, and so derive a support for its judgment from their num- ber^ 2 Of course, all attempts to explanation which assume the mind's knowledge of the condition of the minute subdivisions of the nervous elements are wholly futile and illusory. Wundt 3 cor- rectly calls attention to the fact that the differences in the so-called sensation-circles of the skin are simply a special case under the general psychological laws of the least observable differences in sensations ; only in this case the differences are not pure differences in intensity, but rather differences in the complex color-tone of the quality of sensation. In other words, the sensation-circles represent the local difference between the points at which stimulus must be applied to the skin in order to produce enough of difference in the color-tone of the resulting sensations to make them observable by the mind. These local signs of the skin, as the organ of touch proper, like all local signs, are complex mixtures of feeling belong- ing to different localities ; as such they are dependent, not only 1 So Funke, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 392 f. 2 Comp. Bernstein, The Five Senses of Man, p. 31 f. New York, 1876. 3 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii. , p. 10. THE THEORY OF VIERORDT. 409 upon original, anatomical, and physiological differences, but also upon other peculiarities of the individual, upon habit, and upon association with each other and with other spatial series of sensa- tions of the skin. 24. Difficulty has been found in assigning a conclusive reason why the different areas of the skin should differ so greatly in the fineness of their capacity for making local distinctions. In the view of Lotze, l this difference is chiefly due to the varying character of the areas of the skin, with respect to richness in nerve-fibres, thick- ness and so sensitiveness, support and tension according as the skin is stretched over underlying soft or hard parts fat, muscle, tendon, bone, etc. Doubtless all such influences enter into the determination of that mixture of feeling which characterizes the lo- cal signs of the skin. The theory suggested by Vierordt, 2 on the basis of experiments made by himself and his pupils, should also be mentioned. This investigator concluded that the fineness of the sense of locality belonging to any area of the skin increases in direct proportion with the distance of that area from the axes about which it is rotated. The relative fineness of the organ's local sense is a function of its mobility. Thus an uninterrupted increase of the power of localization exists in the arm from the acromion to the tips of the fingers ; an increase of its movableness, on the whole, also exists. If a value of 100 be assigned to the power of discrimination exercised at the acromion, 151 will represent that of the upper arm, 272 that of the lower arm, 659 of the hand, 2,417 of the thumb, and 2,582 of the tips of the fingers. In estimating the relative movableness of these different parts, it should be re- membered that they not only all move in an enlarging circuit from the shoulder- joint downward, but that each of them from the el- bow-joint downward has its special increased circuit and more numerous forms of motion. But even if Vierordt's law could be strictly demonstrated for every portion of the body, its meaning would have to be translated into other terms in order to be of any real service to psychology. It is therefore suggested by Funke 3 that the increased power of discrimination which belongs to the more movable areas of the skin is really due to the superior facility which they thus have for exercise ; it therefore falls under the law of habit. Furthermore as we have occasion to remark concerning many similar functions 1 See Medicin. Psychologic, p. 405 1 2 Pfluger's Archiv, 1869, ii., pp. 297 ff. ; and Zeitschr. f. Biologie, VI., VII., IX.,X.,XI. 8 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol. , III. , ii. , p. 384. 410 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. of the mind in correlation with the nervous mechanism the effect of acquired habit is not limited to the experience of the individual ; it belongs also to the race. The superior fineness of local sense in some parts of the body may therefore be regarded as largely na- tive to the individual. 25. The view which must be taken of Weber's " sensation-cir- cles," and of the entire subject of the localization of areas of press- ure on the skin, has been largely changed by the recent experi- ments of Goldscheider * and others. We have already seen (p. 346 f.) that this experimenter distinguishes, more carefully than has hitherto been done, the sensations of pressure from other closely allied sensations coming through the same organ. The finest point, when it touches a " pressure-spot," produces a sensation of pressure, and not one of being pricked ; but touching other spots does not produce a sensation of pressure at all. It must be held, then, that the sensations produced by laying a single blunted dividers' point upon the skin, as in Weber's classical experiment, are really very complex, and are composed of the sensations from several pressure- spots blended with other sensations from the rest of the same area not covered by the pressure-spots. The fineness of discrimination possible in any area of the skin depends, then, upon how all the points irritated stand related to the specific pressure-spots. Gold- scheider finds that only when two irritating points touch two press- ure-spots are they felt as two. But when one of the points touches a pressure-spot, and the other touches some place in the contiguous area of skin which is free from such spots, the two points are not both felt ; in this case only the one resting on the pressure-spot is felt. Moreover, the impression of being doubly touched may be ex- cited by the points when lying much nearer together, in case they rest upon pressure-spots that belong to two different chains of such spots than when both spots belong to the same chain. This is to say, pressure-spots thus located have a high degree of sensitive- ness. Still further, the minimum distance required to produce a sensation of being touched twice is surprisingly small, when one of the touching points rests upon a pressure -spot from which the chain radiates or at which it makes a sharp bend. The table of minimum distances at which two points can be felt as two, when the exact nature of the area of the skin on which we are experimenting is known, and everything made as favorable as 1 On this subject, see Goldscheider, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physic-log. Abth. , 1885, Supplement-Band, pp. 1-104 ; especially, p. 84 f . DIRECTION OF THE PKESSURE-SPOTS. 411 possible, consists of numbers very much reduced from those of Weber. Following are some citations from Goldscheider's table : Part of the body. mm. Back of l^nd 0.3-0.6 I. and II. phalanges (volar). . 0.2-0.4 I. and II. phalanges (dorsal).. 0.4-0.8 Upper leg 3.0 Lower leg 0.8-2.0 Back, and sole of foot 0.8-1.0 Part of the body. mm. Back 4-6 Breast 0.8 Forehead 0.5-1.0 Cheek 0.4-0.6 Nose and chin 0.3 Upper and lower arm 0.51.0 From the foregoing data it would seem to follow that, as the con- struction and relation of the chains of pressure-spots differ in the different areas of the body, so will our sense of locality change. The number, sensitiveness, and direction in the chains of these spots determine the sensitiveness of a given area. Moreover, our perception of the size and shape of objects in contact with the skin depends upon the same conditions. This can be shown in an as- tonishing way by comparing the apparent direction which the out- lines of any small body moved across the skin seem to assume with the way the pressure-spots are located in the different areas through which it is moved. If the curve of the chain of pressure-spots, for example, bends in the reverse direction from that of the outline of the body moved, the effect may be to make this outline curve ir- regularly or even straighten it out. It need scarcely be said that Goldscheider regards the true ex- planation of these phenomena to lie in the anatomical distribution of the specific nerves of sense in the different areas of the skin. How- ever this may be, it is certain that our sensations of pressure are primarily "punctiform," and afterward massed into a tactual continu- um ; and that what we primarily know is not the extended object as such, but our sensations of pressure which are afterward objectified. 26. Closely connected with the foregoing is the difference in power of different parts of the skin in giving to the mind data for discriminating the fact, the amount, and the direction of motion in contact with the body. Upon this point the experiments of G. Stanley Hall ' are of special interest. These experiments seem to show that we are more likely, when in doubt, to judge motion on the surface of the limbs to be up rather than down their axis ; on the breast, the shoulder-blades, and the back, the tendency is to judge motion to be toward the head. The discriminative sensi- bility of the skin for motion is much greater than that for sepa- rate touch, as determined by Weber's experiments. Thus, while at 1 Motor Sensations on the Skin, by Professor G. S. Hall and Dr. H. H. Donaldson, in Mind, October, 1885, pp. 557 ff. 412 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. least a distance of 25 mm. between the dividers' points was needed on the volar surface of the right arm, in order to perceive them as two points, both the fact and the direction of motion could be discriminated at an average distance of between 6 and 7 mm. In judging the rate and distance of motion aver the skin the liabil- ity to error is always great ; but, as a rule, distances rapidly trav- ersed are judged to be relatively shorter than the same distances more slowly traversed. Inasmuch, however, as the judgment of motion on the left arm was expressed by reproducing the rate and distance with the right hand, 1 we have a double liability to error involved in regulating the muscular movement of this hand by means of its series of muscular and tactual sensations. Hall found the motor sensibility of different parts of the surface of the skin to be different ; but the differences do not appear to correspond to those belonging to Weber's sensation -circles. The average distance, in millimeters, which a metallic point of 12 mm. in diameter could move over the skin at a rate of 2 mm. per second before a judgment of direction could be formed was found, for one subject of experiment, as follows : forehead, 0.20; upper arm, 0.40; forearm, 0.44; shin, 0.60; palm, 0.74; back, 0.85. Motion can be produced so slowly as not to be discriminated at all, even when the body in contact has really moved from 6 to 12 centimeters. It can also be produced so rapidly as to make it impossible to tell when it begins and when ends. Heavy weights seem to move faster than light ones going at the same rate ; but here other sensations are called out by the deep pressure, and combined with those of con- tact. Hall concludes that heat-spots and cold-spots traversed by the moving body are of great service in judging motion and its di- rection on the skin ; the cold-spots more than the heat-spots, "be- cause of the fainter sensation and wider irradiation " of the latter. Further experiments with a travelling metallic point that carried the stimulus of an electrical current over the surface of the skin showed an astonishing diversity of sensations developed at different points of the area thus traversed. Points of cutting pain, " thrill- points," "tickle-points," " acceleration-points " (or places where the rate of motion seems suddenly to increase without any real change in the speed of the moving metal), " blind-points " (or spots where all impression of contact is momentarily lost), are all to be differen- tiated. Yet the sharp differentiation of these sensations is ren- dered difficult by the fact that the various kinds are so impacted and run together, in a tangle of sensation. The experimenters also speak as though many dermal sensations may thus be partially dis- 1 Mind, October, 1885, p. 564 f. FINENESS OF TEMPERATURE-SENSE. 413 entangled, for the description of which language furnishes no ade- quate terms. All these facts agree exceedingly well with the theory of local signs already proposed. These dermal signs are complex "mixtures" of feeling, which give to each discernible locality a characteristic local stamp. The fact that our sensibility to motion is so much greater in each area of the skin than our susceptibility to the distance of stationary points accords with the same theory. Our ability to localize the dermal sensations is dependent upon the degree and rate of the changes in the color-tone of these sensations. Hall is undoubtedly right in holding that, by moving the touching surface over the surface touched, we do not simply multiply, but also diversify, our data for filling up the dermal blind-spots and judging the nature of impressions. 27. The localizing of sensations of temperature in the skin is, in principle, the same as that of sensations of light-pressure or of motion. The former, however, are in all our ordinary experience interwoven with the latter ; they therefore have the help of the lat- ter in getting a place assigned to them in the periphery of the body. Eecent researches, already referred to (Chap. IV., 22), dem- onstrate the fact that the relative number and arrangement of heat-spots and cold-spots is different for different areas of the skin. Goldscheider l has experimented to determine how far apart the heat-spots and cold-spots must be, respectively, in order that two of them, when stimulated, may "be felt as two. Both kinds of sen- sations are localized, not as points, but as minute warm or cold drops in contact with the skin. By the following table, which gives the minimum distances for different areas of the body, it ap- pears that the sense of locality connected with the cold-spots is about twice as fine, as a rule, as that connected with the heat-spots. The distances are given in millimeters. Part of the body. Cold-spots. Heat-spots. Forehead, cheek, and chin .... 8 3-5 2 4-5 Abdomen . 1 2 4-6 Back . . . . .... 1520 4 6 Upper arm 1.5-2.0 2-3 2-3 2-3 Hollow of the hand 8 2.0 2-3 3-4 1 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1885, Supplement-Band, pp. 70 ff. 414 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. Some basis seems to be laid in the foregoing facts for a system of local signs of the skin, that consist in a mixture of color-tones of temperature-sensations. Yet sensations of heat or cold, in them- selves considered, differ chiefly, if not wholly, in intensity. In them- selves, therefore, they are not well fitted to constitute a so-called " spatial series " of sensations. If, for example, a certain area of the skin be stimulated simultaneously by both heat and cold, at points too near together to be distinguished by touch, the result is neither a modification of one sensation by the other nor a localizing of the two sensations as lying closely side by side. 1 A wavering of perception rather takes place, similar to the strife of colors in vi- sion ; the experience is as though the skin were being touched with a single body alternately hot and cold. Klug also found that the least observable distance between two points touching the skin at the same time depends upon their temperature relative to that of the skin. The medium value of this distance is reached when these points have a temperature of 20-40 C. (68-104 Fahr.) ; it dimin- ishes on either raising or depressing their temperature greatly above or below the zero-point of the skin. The fineness of our sense of locality, as well as of our sensitiveness to motion (comp. 25), is increased by exciting sensations of temperature up to the point where pain intervenes. But the localizing of these sensations is primarily dependent, to a great extent, upon their connection with localized sensations of touch. If we bring two parts of the skin, that differ considerably in temperature, into contact for ex- ample, a cool hand and warm forehead, or a cool hand and a warm one it is often difficult by strict attention to the sensations of tem- perature alone to tell which part is cooler, which warmer. The difficulty is doubtless largely due to the fact that each part which feels the temperature of the other is also changing its own tem- perature in the direction of the temperature of the other. It is therefore induced to feel itself, as it were, as being of the tempera- ture of that other. A confusion of the data for judgment, accord- ingly, takes place. Any localization of the sensations which occurs under such circumstances is largely dependent upon secondary con- siderations, and especially upon the direction of the attention. We judge of depth by sensations of temperature, indirectly, and through our ability to remove or change the intensity and locality of these sensations by changing the position of the body in space as related to what we know to be hot and cold bodies or surround- ing media. 1 See Czerraak, Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., March, 1855, p. 500; confirmed by Klug and others. JSTATUKE OF THE MUSCULAR SENSE. 415 28. The specific sensations of the muscular sense constitute another spatial series which combines with the foregoing in the localizing of areas at the periphery, and of external objects as projected in space and yei known as in contact with the body. In- deed, it is upon this particular system of local signs that the mind is chiefly dependent for its data other than the visual in the synthetic construction of its presentations of bodies that stand re- lated to each other in three dimensions in objective space. Three principal theories have been held as to the nature of the so-called muscular sensations : (1) So far as they are not tactual, they are to be resolved into " central feelings of innervation," which differ only in intensity and not in specific quality, and which result from the changes, initiating movement of the bodily organs, that take place in the brain as correlated with impulses of the will (so Wundt, and others) ; (2) they are not specific sensations, but are due to interpre- tations of those feelings in the skin which originate on account of its changes of position, tension, etc., as the underlying muscles are moved (so Schiff, and others) ; (3) they are specific sensations de- pendent on a specific nerve-apparatus of sense, which has its end- organs in the muscle-fibre, and which is excited by the contraction of the latter in a manner dependent upon the kind, amount, and direction of the muscular movement taking place (so Bell, Weber, Funke, and others). "We have already given certain reasons for rejecting the first two and accepting the last of the foregoing views (see p. 344 f.) ; other reasons will be mentioned subsequently in discussing the so-called "feeling of innervation" or of "active energy." The muscular sense, like all the other senses which contribute to our presentations of objects extended in space, appears to have its own system of local signs. The muscular sensations are qualitatively (and not merely quantitatively) different, according to the combi- nation of the muscles moved, and according to the extension over the muscular area of the stimulus imparted to the sensory nerve- fibres situated in the muscle by the changing condition of the latter as it contracts and relaxes. The series of sensations with all the qualities of rapid and nice gradations which belong to " spatial series " of sensations called out by moving one limb dif- fers from that called out by moving another limb. At each step in the flexing of the leg for example the color- tone of the muscular sensations has a specific quality and value as a local sign, in our consciousness, of the position of the member. The same thing is true of the bending arm, back, or single toe or finger. These sen- sations are intimately, and even inextricably, combined with the 416 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. spatial series of specifically dermal sensations ; but in themselves they have a different quality, and are not localized simply at the surface of the body. As the extent of the circuit of motion gone through by any limb increases, or the intensity of the strain be- comes greater, the quality of the mass of resulting muscular sensa- tions is perpetually changing. These sensations are, accordingly, localized over a broader area of the body and deeper in its sub- stance, as it were. Everyone knows what new mixtures of sensa- tion are produced in consciousness by calling into vigorous exer- cise the unused more deeply lying muscles of the body. Bain 1 has discussed these sensations at great length and with commenda- ble acuteness. But the apparent assumption that these particu- lar sensations can, by being associated, acquire of themselves the quality of extension in space, and the accounting for all our other perceptions of spatial qualities and relations as merely secondary and symbolic of the associated muscular sensations, are in plain contradiction of established psychological facts and principles. The muscular sensations also assist the more strictly tactual in discriminating locality for all cases where the pressure upon the skin exceeds a certain small degree of intensity. In strong contact or heavy pressure the sensory nerves of the underlying muscle are excited ; we have the feeling, not simply of being touched, but also of being pressed. The combination of these two spatial series gives to the mind a doubly constituted system of local signs ; hence, as the experiments of G. Stanley Hall a show, our judgment of di- rection of motion is quicker as the weight resting on the skin is increased up to the limit where other disturbing sensations inter- vene. The superior discriminating power which any member of the body has when permitted to move that is, to call forth fa- miliar series of muscular sensations is largely due to the help which the local signs of this system render to the mind. When the particular member (the hand) which is capable of the nicest tactual discrimination is also permitted to move over an object freely, and to acquire abundant data from all the sources described above, we have fulfilled the most advantageous conditions for the utmost nicety of knowledge possible to " touch," in the widest meaning of the word. 29. It is unnecessary to illustrate in further detail the process by which the mind, with its native synthetic activity, and with the help of qualitatively different sensations, constructs its field of 1 The Senses and the Intellect, especially pp. 57-100, 336-348, and 364- 398. 2 Mind, October, 1885, p. 567. RELATIONS OF EYE AND HAND. 417 touch. To multiply instances would neither explain the ultimate mystery which enters into the processes of " localization " and " ec- centric projection " by touch, nor add materially to our compre- hension of known psycho-physical principles. The muscular sense may probably be said to have the leading position in the develop- ment of the perception of spatial objects and relations, so far as attainable without the aid of sight. Perceptions of the magnitude, distance, and primary spatial qualities such as the extension and inertia of material things are largely dependent upon associated sensations of the muscular sense, although these perceptions cannot be said to be mere compounds of such sensations with secondary and symbolic sensations of other kinds added to them. The activ- ity of the hand, as it moves over various surfaces of the body, either touching them itself or carrying with it something with which these surfaces are touched, early combines with the different series of muscular sensations other spatial series of tactual sensations. The localization of certain points in the area of the body which are of marked local characteristics, and frequently recurrent in ex- perience, is the first achievement in constructing the field of touch. To these landmarks, as it were, other points or areas, subsequently discovered, are referred. One hand learns to know the other ; the right hand chiefly explores the left arm and side and the upper right leg ; the left hand, the right arm and side and the upper left leg. The finger-tips, especially of the right hand, have an office similar to that performed by the yellow-spot of the retina ; they are the centre or hearth of clear perceptions of touch. But in order to bring them to their object they must be moved ; through this mo- tion fresh combinations of muscular and tactual sensations result. 30. But long before the entire field of touch has been con- structed with any considerable approach to completeness, the eye has already explored those parts of the body which are open to its inspection. It learns first to know the hand, which nature keeps constantly in motion before it. As objects rest on the hand, it notes the place where they rest ; with its perceptions of sight cer- tain combinations of tactual sensations thus become associated. As the hand moves over other objects, or especially over the other parts of the body, the eye marks its successive progress ; combined sen- sations of muscular and tactual kind are thus associated with each position of the hand and with each area of the body which it touches. Very early in the development of a normal experience the eye comes to be the leader and critic of the discriminations connected with the muscular and tactual sensations. Its power of rapid movement over its total field, and its delicate judgment on account of the 27 418 THE FIELD OF TOUCH. finely shaded complex local signs which it calls forth with a com- prehensive simultaneousness, give a great superiority to the organ of vision as a geometrical sense. The results of such superiority it constantly places at the disposal of the more slowly moving and less delicate sense of touch. For this reason, one born blind can never attain the same quality (of " comprehensive simultaneous- ness ") for his spatial intuitions and ideas of spatial relations ; even the field of touch, in spite of the greater refinement which the muscular and tactual sensations of such an unfortunate person ac- quire through use, cannot possess this quality as it is imparted by the eye. The familiar experiments of trying to estimate the size, shape, and relation of objects, the amount and direction of motion, etc., when blindfold, show our dependence upon the organ of sight. It must not be forgotten, however, that the discriminations possible through the muscular and tactual sensations alone are wonderfully exact ; and that in certain circumstances touch has sight at a dis- advantage, as it were. Thus the player on the violin who should adjust his spacing of the strings by the sensations of the eye, with the unaccustomed and unfavorable perspective made necessary by its position in relation to the left hand, would not attain the art of making true and pure tones. 31. Among the most complex perceptions of which the skin and muscles by their combined action are capable are the so-called "feelings of double contact." It is largely by means of these feel- ings that skill is acquired in the use of tools, weapons, and musi- cal instruments. In these cases the process of projection goes so far that we seem to feel the object with which the implement is in contact, not so much in the hand (the feelings of contact being located there), by the external means of the implement, but rather as ourselves being in the implement and using it as a sentient part of the organism. The carver in wood feels his chisel move through the stuff he is shaping, and guides it as unerringly as he w r ould his finger, so as to lay it with a given degree of pressure upon a given spot. We are all familiar with the experience of feeling the ground we are about to tread, with a cane or other stick. If the fingers be lightly brushed over the hair when it stands out from the head, it will be difficult to localize the sensations of pressure at the scalp rather than in the hair. We feel the touch of our finger at the end of the tooth, where the contact takes place, instead of where the sensory nerves really receive the stimulus and convert it into a nerve-commotion The management of the implement is, of course, really made FEELINGS OF DOUBLE CONTACT. 419 possible by delicate changes in the shades of feeling called out by its changing pressure upon the nerves terminating in the skin and muscles of the hand, and by the accompanying feelings of strain and of effort that result from the movement of the arm which carries the hand. These feelings are aroused by the end of the implement which is in contact with the body, and are primarily localized in that part of the body ; but they are felt through a more artificial and elaborate process of localization, as though di- rectly dependent upon the other end of the implement. Upon the aesthetic and pleasurable uses of these feelings of double contact Lotze ' has remarked at length. At this point the further discussion of the development of our presentations of sense in general must be arrested, in order to con- sider more in detail the activities of the other great " geometrical sense." 1 See Microcosmus, i., pp. 586 ff. Edinburgh, 1885. CHAPTEE VII. THE PRESENTATIONS OF SENSE. [CONTINUED.] 1. THE application of the general principles which control the development of our presentations of sense to the particular case of the eye has many peculiar difficulties. The physiological psy- chology of visual perception is, therefore, a much controverted and very obscure domain. This fact is doubtless in part due to the amount of experimenting and speculating which has been be- stowed upon it. For here, as elsewhere in scientific research, one chief result of extended examination is to raise unanswered in- quiries. Peculiar difficulties, however, are intrinsic in the case of the eye. These are due to the great complexity of its native activities, and to the speed with which it reaches a generous maturity of development. Nature has equipped this organ with superior means for furnishing to the mind a variety of data, as respects both quantity and quality, for the nicest discriminations ; it has also provided it with such constant stimulation as to cause it to acquire an incomparable facility. But the character of its structure, functions, and development is such as to make experi- ment difficult in a way to disentangle the simple factors from those complex forms into which the synthetic activity of the mind has constructed them. 2. It is affirmed by one authority ' that no less than eight different data, or motifs, are used in monocular vision by the adult for perceiving the third dimension of space and of visual objects in space. These are the changes with respect to (1) extent and (2) clearness, of the complex of the sensations of color and light, as dependent on distance ; (3) the perspective elevation of the bottom of distant objects above the horizon; (4) the covering of known distant objects by those placed nearer ; (5) the alter- ations of light and shadow on the curved surfaces of the object, according as they are nearer or more remote ; (6) the perspective contraction of the retinal image ; (7) the change of the visor angle in proportion to the distance of the object ; (8) the muscular sen- 1 Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologic, II. , p. 84. PROBLEM OF VISUAL PERCEPTION. 421 sations of the accommodation of the eye. To these eight data, two others at least must be added for binocular vision ; namely (9), the stereoscopic double_Jmages, and (10) the sensations arising from convergence of the axes. These ten sets of variable experiences may be cornbinecf7"6"Fcourse, in an almost infinite variety of proportions. Moreover, it is not improbable that we shall have to admit still ; other data as entering into the complex perceptions of sight. The tactual, as well as muscular, sensations which accompany the move- ment of the eyeballs in their sockets are not ineffective in giving grounds for judgment in certain cases. The question must also be raised : Do not the visual sensations themselves have a certain local coloring directly dependent upon the nervous elements of the retina which are excited by the stimuli ? If we answer this question affirmatively, we shall have a system of local retinal signs as constituting one of the most primary of the spatial series of sensations entering into the space-perceptions of this sense. And after all this cataloguing of data, the dispute as to the existence of series of sensations of innervation that have a central origin and differ only in intensity as directly dependent upon so-called acts of will (so Wundt) remains unsettled. Several of the data just enumerated, however, are plainly of only secondary rank and value ; they do not necessarily enter into every preception of a visual object as such. What does seem necessary to the most elementary form of visual perception may be stated as follows : Sensations of light and color, differing in intensity and qual- ity, but simultaneously present in consciousness, must be systematically arranged with reference to each other by being localized with the help of retinal signs, and associated with other spatial series of muscular sensations that arise from accommodation of the eye and from its motion. The complexity of the combinations arising in the normal use of the organ of vision is, of course, increased by the fact that there are two eyes, and, therefore, two retinas with their sj'stems of retinal signs, two images of each object, and two sets of motions. But the two eyes are (as we shall see subsequently) in a certain sense to be regarded as one eye certainly as constituting one organ of vision. So that, even when one eye is closed, the other does not see what it sees without being influenced by the closed and relatively inoperative part of the one organ. The constancy with which the eyes act together explains, in part, why they are one organ as the two hands are not ; but the frequency with which we voluntarily suppress the activity of one eye by closing it explains, in part, why they are not one organ as are the two nostrils or the two ears. 422 DATA OR MOTIFS OF VISION. 3. Could we select an adult human being who had never seen, and proceed to develop his visual perceptions, experimentally, in the direct order of their complexity, we might possibly rely upon his description of his experience to solve certain problems that now seem unsolvable. We should wish, before either eye had been moved when open, to excite the nervous elements of a small area of one stationary retina, and to ascertain how far the sensations of light and color thus excited could be said to have any strictly "local" arrangement with reference to each other. We should then wish to try the effect of combining with these sensations other spatial series, consisting of muscular sensations and arising from the ac- commodation and motion in its orbit of the same eye. Finally, the intricate process of putting the two eyes together both open and both moving might be studied in detail. At present, however, it is quite impossible to say what the experience of the subject of such experiments would be. The testimony of the few blind per- sons whose eyes have been couched is so meagre and unsatisfac- tory, on account of its failure to comply with the conditions of scientific investigation, that it can be used only to confirm con- clusions arrived at on other grounds. Nothing remains, then, but to employ the data which physiological optics has secured, in order to make a theoretic reconstruction (confessedly imperfect and doubt- ful) of the process that nature is all the while successfully com- pleting. In this effort we naturally follow the order of nature, so far as possible ; we begin with the simplest conceivable case, and proceed from it to the explanation of the amazing complexity which really belongs to our apparently simple daily experience of vision with two trained eyes. This is substantially the course followed by Wundt, 1 who finds three things to be considered in explaining the developed perceptions of sight : (1) The retinal image of the eye at rest, and the motifs which it furnishes ; (2) the single eye as moved, and the influence of these movements ; (3) the conditions furnished by the existence and relations of the two eyes exercis- ing their functions in common. But, in reality, from the very be- ginning of its activity the eye is in motion, and acts as a double organ. Corresponding to the three sets of considerations just mentioned, we may speak of three fields of vision which are to be constructed in the order of their complexity. They may be called, respectively, the retinal field of vision, the field of monocular vision, and the field of binocular vision. In the " retinal field of vision " we mean to include only such a perception or mental spatial arrangement 1 Physiolog. Psychologic, ii. , p. 62. NATURE OF THE RETINAL FIELD. 423 of sensations of color and light as points lying side by side as would be presented through the excited expanse of nervous ele- ments constituting the retina of one motionless eye, in case there had been no previous vision with both eyes in motion. The field of monocular vision, when completely constructed, includes all that can be seen with one eye as the result of its experience, devel- oped, but unaided by the other eye. The field of binocular vision includes all that can be seen by both eyes. The first two so- called " fields of vision " are, strictly speaking, fictitious and theo- retically constructed in order to explain the process by which the mind reaches the construction of the third and last. Indeed, the question may be pressed, whether w r e can speak of a purely " retinal field of vision," and whether the excited mosaic of nervous elements on which the image is formed, without aid from muscular sensations of the eye, could furnish any presentations of sight. 4. The most nearly original experience of sensations of light and color which can be easily produced for adult observation is gained by closing and blindfolding both eyes, and then keeping them as motionless as possible. Let time enough be allowed for all the after-images, both positive and negative, to die wholly away. Nothing is then seen but a small and undefined expanse or massive aggregate of related color-sensations, which we will call the " ret- inal field ; " it might almost be said that this is felt rather than seen. Such " vision " (?) of a certain continuum of sensations can- not be said to be either localized or projected in space, as a whole, and by the eye alone. When we speak of it, for example, as " in front of " the upper part of the body, we introduce terms that are derived from experiences of touch. Now, without moving or un- covering the eyes, let the head be turned to the right or to the left, and the expanse of color-sensations will move in the same direction ; or, if we turn the face upward, the retinal field seems above us ; if downward, then it seems to sink toward our feet. But each position of this field, as a whole, is entirely determined by the fact that the customary muscular and tactual sensations assure us of the posture of the head with reference to the rest of the body. Such localization is accomplished chiefly by sensations in the neck. So far as sight alone is concerned, the entire expanse of color-sen- sations cannot be said to be perceived as anywhere in space. The "retinal field" has no clearly defined limits, or boundary- lines ; it may be described rather as having its expanse of sensa- tions distinguished by a shifting, graded transition into a region of no-sensations. This fact is, of course, due to the constantly chang- ing activity of the nervous elements of the retina. Yet the sensa- 424: DATA OR MOTIFS OF VISION. tions which are massed in the foregoing experience constitute a true spatial expanse ; they are not simply recognized as differing in color-tone, or brightness or intensity of effect, but as having true local distinctions, and as being arranged into a system of points of color and light lying side by side. In other words, the different sensations do not fall together in consciousness so as to resemble the one sensation of smell produced by irritating simultaneous!} 7 a number of fibres of the olfactory nerve ; nor are they simply ana- lyzable into several qualitatively different factors, as is the com- plex sensation of a musical clang. They are presented as spatially systematized, as a true perception of an extended object. The " ret- inal field " may, then, be said to be extended in two dimensions ; and the minima wsibilia which compose it all have local relations to each other. It cannot properly be said, however, to have depth (as Stumpf 1 and Hering 2 hold that it does) ; for the different col- ored points are not projected as different in distance, nor can we be said to look into the colored space thus presented before the mind. It is true that the expanse of the retinal field is not like that of a darkly colored wall or curtain placed in front of the eye. But the quasi-appearance of depth is due to constant ^m^g^- i" color-tone and brightness of the minute^jjpr tions of the field, which has an effect somewhat like that we geton looking at a very dens'eTjnist oFjjarticlea diSerentJy^colored and drifting. In other words, the secondary and derived data give to it an appearance which we have learned to associate with the perception of depth. 5. Further experiment, however, with this so-called "retinal field " serves to show how complicated its apparently simple char- acter really is. In the first place, even this field is the result of the combined action of the two retinas. If, with both eyes closed, a "phosphene " (see p. 195 f.) be produced in either eye by pressing upon its ball, the colored circle will be located in the correspond- ing part of the field ; but the character of the entire field, as formed by the activity of both retinas, will be changed. It is, of course, impossible to suppress the action of one retina, and thus exam- ine a monocular "retinal field," as it were. But it may easily be shown that, even in vision with one eye open and in motion, the character of the whole field of vision is under the influence of the retinal activity of the closed eye. Let one of the eyes both hitherto closed and motionless now be opened. Immediately a 1 Ueber d. physiolog. Ursprung d. Raumvorstellung. Leipzig, 1873. Stumpf holds that "Space is just as originally and directly perceived as quality" (p. 115). 5 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., IIL, i., p. 572 f. NATURE OF THE RETINAL FIELD. 425 picture of all the objects falling within the field of monocular vision appears before us ; each object seen with its position, magnitude, and spatial relations determined according to the law r s of visual perception. This monocular field seems bounded on one side (the left side if the right eye is opened, the right side if the left) by the rather dim outline of the nose and lower line of the forehead. What has become of the retinal field of the closed eye ? It has been submerged or overwhelmed by the field of the open eye, on account of the latter's stationary and clearly defined images and strong arrest and fixation of attention. But if a character to arrest and fix the attention be given to the field of the closed eye, it may be made in turn to overwhelm that of the open eye. This can be accomplished by producing strong " phosphenes " in the former. On pressing the closed eye brightly colored circles are presented in the corresponding part of the field ; and by using sufficient press- ure the objects seen as projected in space by the open eye are drowned in a shower of minute, vivid sparks. The " retinal field " has its character determined also by as- sociated muscular .sensations dependent upon the movement of both eyes. It will be found impossible to make any definite area of this retinal field, which lies much to the right or left, to the upper or lower part, of its centre, a matter of regard without detecting slight movements of the eyes according to the direc- tion in which the attention is to be fixed. The value of muscular movements in this case cannot consist in their enabling a clear image of objects situated in different relations to the eye to be formed on its retina ; for with closed eyes no change is occasioned in the retinal images by motion of the eyes. The conclusion, then, is, that certain muscular sensations constitute an indispensable part of the data for localizing objects even in the retinal field at least such as are only a slight distance from its centre. Moreover, it will be found that the extent of this entire field and its pro- longation, as it were, in any given direction are dependent upon the accommodation and motion of the eyes. The explanation of this fact can be found only in the same truth, namely : The per- ception of localized areas in the two-dimensioned " retinal field " of the closed eyes is dependent upon the revival of associated muscular sen- sations. 6. The foregoing facts undeniably afford considerable support to the " empiristic " theory of visual perception ; but they do not show that the considerations it brings forward are entirely con- clusive. They do not even prove the truth of Wundt's statement : ' 1 Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 69. 426 DATA OK MOTIFS OF VISION. " Our sensations of light do not immediately possess spatial form." After excluding all the factors which combine into our ordinary presentations of sight such as double images, accommodation, convergence of the axes of the eyes, and secondary helps by way of shadows, perspective, elevation, etc. a certain spatial quality still remains to the simplest sensations of color and light which we are able to reproduce. It will naturally be objected that these sensations are the reactions of a mind that has had a long pre- vious experience in localizing visual sensations by means of just such helps as the foregoing. The question then recurs : Is the fact that the sensations of light and color, which are produced by the simultaneous excitation of many nervous elements of the ret- ina, appear as locally distinct (even when the eyes are closed and motionless) an otherwise unexplained datum due to an original activity of the mind under the law of the specific energy of these nervous elements ; or is it a result of acquired experience, to be explained by the revival of images of previously associated impres- sions obtained when the eyes were both open and moving ? To take the former position is to adopt, so far forth, the nativistic theory of visual perception ; to take the latter is to espouse the empiristic opinion. Either position has its difficulties. The for- mer seems to us, however, nearer to the ultimate truth. 7. That the sensations of light and color occasioned by stimu- lating different elements of the retina have a different value in consciousness, and that the recognition of this value, and the pres- entation of the sensations as locally separate and arranged into a spatial system, is native to the mind, may be argued from the following among other reasons : The peculiar mosaic structure of the retina is obviously the fundamental cause for the pre-eminence of the eye as a "geometrical sense." It has already been shown (Chap. IV., 3) that each element of this structure may be regarded as an isolated sensitive spot, which corresponds, on the one side, to individual irritations from the stimuli, and, on the other, to the smallest localized sensations of light and color. But the latter part of this statement could not be true unless each of the elements in this nervous mosaic had a certain peculiar representative value in consciousness. In other words, sensations of light and color are localized in part, at least, by means of the specific local quality which belongs to the result of the different points in the retina being simultaneously irritated. The very construction of this or- gan, as well as the correspondence between its construction and the nicety attained in its use for local distinctions, indicates that the spa- tial quality of our visual percepts depends upon its specific functions. NATTJEE OF THE RETINAL IMAGE. 427 Moreover, unless the series of light- and color-sensations had an original spatial character, it is difficult to see how they could com- bine with the other spatial series of the eye into perceptions of ex- tended colored objects. It is difficult to see what advantage they would then have over the series of musical tones varying in pitch. Still further, it is as impossible to prove experimentally as it is to make seem true to consciousness that the arrangement of the points of light and color which appears before us with closed and motionless eyes is only the residuum, as it were, of past sensations of a muscu- lar kind. Such an appeal to consciousness could not be made, in- deed, with any confidence, if scientific analysis were able to show that the color-sensations can be perceived simultaneously, as a sys- tem of points lying side by side, without having the characteristics of a spatial series. But in view of our inability to do this, we only account for the facts of consciousness by admitting what the very structure of the organ suggests, and what general psychological theory seems to confirm, when we hold that spatial perception, at least in germinal form, is native to the mind as a synthesis of the qualitatively different sensations which result from stimulating simul- taneously the retinal mosaic of nervous elements. The foregoing view is very different from that which assumes that we have an immediate knowledge of the retinal image ; or that a knowledge of the direction from which the light falls upon the retina is an unresolvable intuition of the mind. 1 To such mis- taken statements it is a sufficient reply to show that the subjective image (or mental presentation) of the object does not correspond either to the image on the retina or to the real object as it is other- wise known to exist in space. The mental presentation, for exam- ple, has no blind-spot ; it is a different representation of the real object from that offered by the retinal image, with more inaccu- racies than belong to the latter as seen by an observer looking at it from without. 2 To the question, then, whether sensations of light and color would have space-form if they came only from an excited but motionless retina, and were uncombined with other sensations of a spatial series, we can give only a tentative and par- tial answer. Doubtless the "presentations of sense" formed by combining such sensations alone would be indescribably different from those to which we now ascribe visual space-form. An animal with a single immovable expanse of nervous elements susceptible 1 See Le Conte, Sight, pp. 85 f. and 105. New York, 1881. Le Conte is obliged to admit, however, that this " law of direction " is sometimes opposed to the "law of corresponding points " (p. 258). 2 See Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 68. 428 DATA OR MOTIFS OF VISION. to irritations from light could not be said to have what we call " vision." But, on the other hand, the spatial quality which be- longs to the visual sensations of man cannot be all resolved into muscular and tactual sensations of eye and hand ; these sensations, quoad sensations of light and color, do have the quality which in- sures their arrangement in consciousness in spatial order. This fact is due to the working of the law of the specific energy of the nervous retinal elements in connection with the native activity of mind in synthesizing these sensations. The law as applied to the eye is essentially the same as that already demonstrated for the skin ; the activity assumed as native to man is not essentially dif- ferent from that ascribed to the lower animals in the use of their senses. That this tact for the individual has been largely won by the development of the race is a proposition to which our attitude is determined by more general conclusions. But physiological op- tics cannot account for the phenomena of vision without assum- ing both the original exercise of this tact and the theory of local retinal signs as data hitherto unresolvable by its analysis. 8. Whatever may be thought of the foregoing assumptions, it is certain that ordinary adult visual perception involves the motion of the open eye monocular vision of one eye and binocular of both. The sensations which accompany such motion must be com- bined with sensations of light and color to make the complete pres- entations of sight. The consideration of the simplest ca'se requires that we should recur to the physiology of the eye. Only one small spot in the retina (the so-called "fovea centralist see p. 183), is capable of giving a perfectly clear image of an object. When, then, we desire to see an object clearly, we bring its image upon this spot and fixate it there. That point of the object to which the centre of the retinal area of clearest vision corresponds is called the "point of regard" (or "fixation-point"). In ordinary vision, then, the eye constantly changes its point of regard, and so brings successively upon its most sensitive area the images of the different points of its object. The different changes of position in the point of regard are accompanied by sensations of motion and strain ; they are accom- plished by the six muscles of the eyeball. This wandering of the point of regard over an object may be considered as accom- plished by rotating the eye upon a pivotal point, or " centre of rotation," by motions that have different axes of rotation. The centre of rotation is, however, only theoretically a point, but is really an interaxial space. It has been variously located for normal eyes at about 13.45-13.73 mm. behind the cornea, and 1.24-1.77 PRIMARY POSITION OF THE EYE. 429 mm. behind the middle of the optical axes. Of such axes of rota- tion, three are especially to be distinguished an antero-posterior, a vertical, and a transverse. A line drawn from the centre of rotation to the point of regard is called the "line of regard;" since each eye has its own cen- tre of rotation, there are, in vi- sion with both eyes, two lines of regard. A plane passing through these two lines is called " the plane of regard" (or "plane of vision"). 1 In the "primary posi- tion " the head is erect and the line of regard directed toward the distant horizon. The plane passing through the lines of re- gard of both eyes in this position is the " primary plane of vision." In this position for most eyes, however, the line of vision is in- clined somewhat below the hori- zontal plane. Starting from the primary po- sition, one set of positions are suc- cessively assumed by moving the eye upon its transverse and verti- cal axes. When the eye rotates round the former, the line of regard is displaced either above or below ; it thus makes a varying angle with the line corresponding to its first direction, and this is called the " angle of vertical displacement " (so Helmholtz), or the " ascen- sional angle." When it moves about the vertical axis, the line of regard is displaced from side to side, and forms with the median plane of the eye a varying angle called " the angle of lateral dis- placement." In passing from the primary position to the foregoing secondary position no rotation of the axis itself occurs. Another order of positions is assumed by an apparent rotation on the antero- posterior axis, combined with lateral or vertical displacements ; this movement results in bringing the eye to an oblique position, and is really a torsion of the eye. The angle which the plane of regard makes with the transverse plane measures the amount of torsion, and is called the " angle of torsion." 1 For the detailed theory of the movements of the eye, see Hering, in Her- mann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., chaps. 9-11 ; Helmholtz, Physiolog. Op- tik, 27-30 ; and Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 72 f. FIG. 97. Diagram of the Attachments of the Muscles of the Eye, and of their Axes of Ro- tation the latter being shown by dotted lines. The axis of rotation of the rectus, externus, and internus, being perpendicular to the plane of the paper, cannot be shown. 430 DATA OR MOTIFS OF VISION. 9. The various movements possible for the eye in all the direc- tions just described are accomplished by the combined pull of the muscles of the eye as summarized in the following table * (for the muscles and their position, see Fig. 49 f., p. 174) : Number of muscles active. Direction of line of regard. Muscles acting.. On6 Inward Internal rectus. Outward External rectus Upward j Superior rectus. Two / Inferior oblique. Downward j Inferior rectus. Three 'Inward and upward, . . . Inward and downward . . (Superior oblique. Internal rectus. \ Superior rectus. ( Inferior oblique. ( Internal rectus. j Inferior rectus. ( Superior oblique. Outward and upward . . ^ Outward and downward. ( External rectus. s Superior rectus. ( Inferior oblique. ( External rectus. A Inferior rectus. ( Superior oblique. 10. The law which seems to govern all the eye's movements of torsion or combined movements sideways, and either up or down was conjectured by Listing, whose name it bears, and elaborated by Helmholtz. Listing's law is stated by Helmholtz a in the fol- lowing terms : " When the line of regard passes from its primary position into any other position, the torsion of the eye (as meas- ured by the angle of torsion) in the second position is the same as if the eye were turned about a fixed axis standing perpendicular to both the first and the second positions of the line of regard." The same principle is stated in different language by Wundt : 3 "All movements of the eye from its primary position take place about fixed axes, each of which at the point of rotation stands at right angles to the plane which is described by revolving the line of re- gard ; and all of these axes lie in a single plane, at right angles to the primary position of the line of regard, at its point of rotation." The orientating of the eye, then, for every possible position of the line of regard, may be referred to a constant standard. Concerning one important matter in the carrying out of Listing's law, there is a direct conflict of view between authorities. According to Helin- 1 Given by Beaunis, and to be found in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, ninth ed., VIII., p. 825. 2 Physiolog. Optik, p. 466. 3 Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 79 f. THE EFFECT OF ROTATION. 431 holtz,' when the plane of vision is raised, lateral displacements to the right produce rotation of the eye to the left, and lateral dis- placements to the left produce rotation to the right ; when the plane of vision is depressed, lateral displacements to the right pro- duce rotation to the right, and vice versa. But according to Le Conte, 2 in elevation of the visual plane the eyes both move and ro- tate to the right or to the left ; in depression of this plane, motion of the eyes to the right is accompanied with rotation to the left, and motion to the left with rotation to the right. More detailed statement of the laws of the eye's motion in vi- sion is not necessary for the purposes of physiological psychology. It need only be noted that the construction of the field of monocular or binocular vision is a synthetic mental achievement dependent upon the varying sensations which result from the wandering of the point of regard over the outline of an object. Starting from its primary posi- tion, the eye may come around, as it were, by a variety of circui- tous paths, to the fixation of any particular point of its object. In the pursuit of these paths it develops various series of muscular sensations that have spatial qualities and are fitted to combine with the spatial series of light and color sensations. Thus the field of vision necessarily has the same form as the surface over which the point of regard can be made to wander. Its construction is a pro- gressive synthesis of the mind, stimulated and guided by means which consist in varying states of consciousness, chiefly dependent upon the local coloring of the two sets of sensations thus far described. 11. Certain important consequences follow as to the relation between the lines of the extended and objective " thing " and the lines of the retinal image, as affording the mind data for the spatial ordering of the sensations that arise from stimulating the nervous retinal elements and nerve-fibres of the muscles of the eye. Both the general form of the field of vision and the relative position of the objects in it are determined by the movements of the eye. The rule is, that only those objects which are seen by direct vision (their images lying in the line of regard when the eye is in its primary position) appear in their actual place ; objects indirectly seen ap- pear in the place which they would assume if their retinal images were transposed to the point of regard and its immediately sur- rounding points. 3 It follows, further, that all lines lying outside of the vertical and horizontal meridians of the retina, in order to be seen straight, must be really bent ; and all really straight lines in 1 Physiolog. Optik., p. 463. 8 Sight, pp. 173 ff. ; and American Journal of Science and Arts, xx. (1880), pp. 83 ff. 3 Comp. Wuiidt, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 90 f. 432 DATA OR MOTIFS OF VISION. such positions are seen bent. This fact may be proved in various ways. If a sheet of white paper, having a black dot in its centre to serve as a point of regard, be held at right angles to the line of vision, with the eye in its primary position and constantly fixed upon this point, thin, straight slits of black paper outside of the two meridians will appear bent. Or if the after-images left on these meridians of the retina by light falling through narrow and straight slits be studied when torsion of the eye takes place, these after-im- e\ FIG. 98 (From Herinpf. after Helmholtz). With the eye at the distance e-e, and fixated upon the centre, the hyperbolic lines which limit the black and white surfaces show the eo-called ' ' right lines " of the field of vision. ages will themselves be found to suffer torsion. 1 Such images, re- ceived upon the vertical meridian of the eye when it is in its pri- mary position, lean to the right, thus / , when the visual plane is elevated and the eye moved to the right ; but when, with this plane elevated, the eye is moved to the left, the vertical image in- clines to the left, thus V . With depression of the visual plane, the inclination of the after-image is reversed. The image of a perfect rectangular cross is distorted as follows by different torsions 1 See Le Conte, Sight, pp. 164 ff. SENSATIONS OF ACCOMMODATION. 433 of the eye : Upward and to the right, -^-". ; upward and to i ' \ the left, ^K ; downward and to the right, *^X^ ; down- V. '/ \ ward and to the left, - 11 j- n on 6, and in the other on 7, the dis- friends, and to SC6 O116 body partially *S through the transparent image of an- other. If two objects very similar- for example, the two forefingers-be held a little way apart at about a foot distant and against a clear sky, three like objects, one solid and two transparent, may be made to appear by combining the two middle images and dissociating the two on the outside. Two systems of regularly recurring similar objects such as a regular small pattern of carpet or wall-paper, or the diamond-shaped spaces of a wire- gratingmay have all their images combined by slipping them, as it were, simultaneously to one side. There is, then, a double-seeing of what is really single and a single-seeing of what is really double ; but the latter is much rarer than the former, and seldom occurs except when brought about for purposes of experiment. 15. It is obvious that the relations of the two images of an ob- ject cannot remain unchanged when the eyes are moved from their primary position. When the eyes are converged upon an object, the images which are formed on the central spots of the two retinas, by rays coming from the point of regard, are exactly identical and corresponding ; the object in this case is therefore seen absolutely sin- gle. Points of the object lying near to the point of regard in any di- rection, and thus having their images formed close to the centres of CALCULATION OF THE HOROPTER. 437 the two retinas, are also seen single. For the points of the retinas on which the images are then formed, although not strictly identi- cal, are corresponding ; that is, they have habitually act- ed together in seeing ob- jects single by binocular vision, and the slight incon- gruousness of the two sets of images is disregarded, as it were, by the mind. But all objects lying nearer or more remote than the point fixated by the eyes are liable to be seen double ; for their images do not fall on corre- sponding points of the re- tinas. Objects lying below or above, or to one side or the other, of the point of regard, do not, as a rule, have their images formed on corresponding points ; they may, therefore, also be seen double. Some of these points, however, which oc- cupy positions below or above, to the one side or the other, of the point of regard, are seen single. The sum of all the points which are seen single while the point of regard remains the same is called the horopter. There has been a great amount of calculation, experiment, and discussion, to determine the exact nature of the horopter. It has been held to be a surface (plane or curved), a circle, a line, a num- ber of disconnected points. Its calculation as a matter of mathe- matics is unsatisfactory, for the really corresponding points of any two retinas are not to be determined by mathematics. Experiment is made exceedingly difficult by the indistinctness with which we see objects that do not lie near the point of regard. No conclusions regarding the nature of the horopter are, perhaps, on the whole, more trustworthy than Meissner's. 1 They are thus summarized by Le Conte. 2 With the eyes in the primary position, the horopter is 1 Beitrage zur Physiologie d. Seuorgans, Leipzig, 1874 ; and Archives des Sciences, iii. (1858),' p. 1601 2 Sight, p. 204. FIG. 101 (From Hering). //, the sash of the window, and p the black spot fixated. On the left line of vinion / b lies a distant object, and on the right line r e another object. The images of 6 and e, as well as the image of p, fall on the place of direct vision and, therefore, on corresponding points of the two retinas. 438 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. a plane perpendicular to the median line of sight. For all nearer points in the primary plane, it is a line which dips toward the ob- server with an inclination to the visual plane, increasing with the nearness of the point of regard. When the plane of vision is turned upward, the inclination of the horopteric line increases ; when the plane is turned downward, the inclination of the line decreases until it becomes zero at 45, and the line expands into a plane. The plane of the horopter, then, passes through the point of regard perpendicular to the median visual line. With these conclusions the careful experiments of Le Conte himself correspond in the main ; but Le Conte considers that the inclination of the horopteric line remains constant, and that its surface, when the horopter be- comes a surface, is curved instead of a plane. 16. The existence and relation of the two images in binocular vision is of the greatest importance for all perception of solid objects set at varying distances from each other. It is largely by their help that binocular perspective and stereoscopic vision are explicable. But all such elaborate and complex presentations of visual sense require for understanding them certain considerations concerning binocular movements of the eyes. In binocular move- ments the laws of parallel motion hold good only for the case when the eyes, being in the primary position, are both turned equally in the same direction. But in fixating the point of regard for the two eyes for a near object the eyes move in opposite directions, so that the lines of vision may converge upon the object. In convergence the eyes rotate on the optic axis in opposite directions. 1 Since divergence of the eyes in visual activity is, in all ordinary cases, impossible, there are three customary indissoluble conjunctions of motion which belong to the eyes as under control from the central nervous organism ; these are, right and left together, up and down together, or turning symmetrically inward. In lowering the plane of vision, as well as in fixating the point of regard upon near objects, convergence naturally takes place ; in elevating this plane or in looking upon distant objects, the converging lines of regard diverge toward a parallel position. Convergence may be " sym- metrical " or " asymmetrical ; " in the former case the two lines of regard are turned inward at equal angles and the point of regard is kept in the median plane of vision ; in the latter case the point of regard is outside of the median plane, and either the two eyes are turned at unequal angles inward, or else one is turned inward, and the other, at a smaller angle, outward. Both kinds of convergence are possible at different angles of the elevation of the plane of vision. 1 See Le Conte, Sight, p. 178 f. THE INFLUENCE OF ATTENTION. 439 Listing's law does not hold for movements of the eyes in conver- gence. 1 The principal points at which this law is abrogated for converging motion of the eyes are stated thus by Le Conte : 2 When the right eye moves to the left in convergence, it rotates to the right instead of to the left as in parallel motion ; so the left eye rotates to the left when turning inward. Whereas in parallel mo- tion the torsion of the eye increases with the angle of the depres- sion of the plane of vision, in convergent motion it decreases to zero at 45. These facts doubtless result in imparting variety of local coloring to those sensations of strain, etc., which are produced in the two kinds of motion of the eyes, and which serve the mind as local signs in its synthesis of extended visual objects. Changes of accommodation naturally accompany the changing convergence of the eyes for near objects, and the resulting sensa- tions enter into the spatial series out of which the presentations of visual sense are constructed. In the alteration of the indices of re- fraction, and in the contraction of the pupils, the eyes act together under the influence of motor impulses from the central nervous organs. 17. An effort to see, and a corresponding fixation of the atten- tion upon the object lying at the point of regard, are implied in the convergence of the eyes. The eyes of new-born children and eyes that are recently couched after long-continued blindness move, as a rule, in parallel lines. 3 Arrest of attention brings the two eyes into use as one organ, and this necessitates the turning of the lines of vision of both so that they shall meet at a common point where lies their common object. It follows, also, that the sensa- tions accompanying innervation of their muscles so as to produce convergence are of capital importance in the construction of the most elaborate and intelligent visual presentations. According to Wundt, these " feelings of innervation " are the direct expression in consciousness of the cerebral changes that accompany the initiat- ing of motor impulses in the central organs. They differ only in intensity or amount. It is by the " feeling " of this amount, as it were, that our knowledge of the size and distance of the object seen in convergence is obtained. Wundt's view 4 of the nature and origin of the feelings of innervation, however, is unsatisfactory. In the opinion of Hering, 6 the innervation of both eyes is equal, 1 Comp. Hering, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 497 f . ; and Le Conte, Sight, pp. 177 ff. 2 Sight, p. 190. 3 Comp. Bonders in Pfliiger's Archiv, xiii., p. 383. 4 See Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 118 f. 6 Physiolog. Optik, Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 519 f. 440 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. however they are moved with relation to each other. Even when the movements of the two are unequal, the law holds ; for each eye is then under the influence of two innervations, one of which is directed toward turning both eyes right or left, and the other toward turning them inward or outward. As a result, in one eye the two innervations would support, and in the other eye oppose, each other thus bringing about a compensation. In this way the will guides its pair of horses in either direction by a pull upon one rein. The innervation for accommodation is also supposed to be in like manner bilateral and uniform. Whatever view may be taken of the foregoing theories as to the distribution of central innerva- tion to the two eyes and as to the origin of so-called " feelings of innervation," there can be no doubt that the mental representatives of the different areas passed over and positions reached, in both parallel and converging motions, are important factors in construct- ing the presentations of sight. 18. By the various helps already described, stereoscopic vision and the seeing of things in perspective are made possible. To one eye acting alone and without previous experience, only one of the spatial series possible could, in any event, serve as a suggestion of depth ; this is the series of muscular sensations accompanying the accommodation of the eye to near distances. How little such sen- sations of themselves can accomplish, even at the end of years of experience in binocular vision, the experiments of Wundt make obvious (already alluded to, p. 433). Our localization of objects by one eye, with respect to the third dimension of space, is con- fessedly very imperfect even under the best of circumstances. It is probable, then, that the field of monocular vision is directly known only as a plane, and that all immediate perception of depth depends upon the existence of double images and muscular sen- sations derived from the movements, especially in convergence, of the two eyes. The stereoscopic and perspective vision which takes place, with apparent immediateness, even when one eye is closed, is therefore really mediate and indirect ; it is accomplished solely by second- ary means of varying intensities of light and color, changes in apparent magnitude, etc., on the basis of associations gained by using both eyes and the hand. Accordingly, it is easy to reduce all the objects seen in the field of monocular vision to one depth to flatness outlined on the same plane by cutting off these secondary helps and withdrawing attention as much as possible from the influence of judgment based on experience. By nearly closing one eye while the other is wholly shut, objects really THE PERCEPTION OF DISTANCE. 441 situated at different distances from the head may easily be made to appear as patches of light and color blended, indistinguishably to the visual perception, with other patches of the retina's own light. That is to say, when the results of experience in interpret- ing the secondary signs of the third dimension are withdrawn, the field of monocular vision becomes as purely two-dimensioned as is the "retinal field." 19. There is no doubt that the double images, and the muscu- lar sensations resulting from binocular movement, furnish motifs for the immediate perception of the distance and solidity of ob- jects. In other words, these two spatial series are most important data for constructing visual presentations of objects having the third dimension. It is more doubtful just how this service is rendered. Stereoscopy has made the fact familiar, that the two images of each object are different as furnished by the two eyes. 1 The right eye sees the object farther around on its right side, the left eye on its left. Every small portion of a solid object, as seen in binocular vision, provided it lies a little way out of the point of regard, instead of consisting of two exactly similar sets of lines which might be superimposed, consists of two sets of minute curves that are partial images of its lines and are different for each eye. The constant and uniform objects of sense which appear through the use of both eyes result, therefore, from uniting a great number of varying partial images of these objects due to simul- taneous excitation of both retinas. In some manner or other the perception of solidity is substantially aided by the combination of these partial images. Furthermore, in ordinary binocular vision, our perception of the solidity and distance of objects is accomplished largely by motion of the eyes which successively unites and separates the double im- ages of the objects seen. In viewing all objects of any size, whether near or distant, we may readily become conscious of the fact that we are engaged in sweeping over the field of vision with a moving point of regard. Even when we suppose the eye to be looking at a single point, with a perfectly fixed regard, it is actually making short and rapid excursions in one direction and another around this point. How difficult it is to keep the organ of vision perfectly motionless, anyone knows who has tried to hold steady one of the floating specks (muscce volitantes) situated in, and projected in the 1 For the study of the theory of stereoscopy as a matter of optics, the reader is referred to treatises on this science ; a brief allusion to the fact is enough for our purpose, which primarily is, of course, to illustrate the psychology of visual perception. 442 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. air before, this organ. Such facts strengthen the theory of Briicke 1 and others, that we gain our perception of depth by running the point of regard back and forth with a varying degree of conver- gence to the axes, and so combining successively the different parts of the two pictures as seen by the two eyes. But that motion is not necessary for stereoscopic vision with adult eyes is proved by what is known as " Dove's experiment." A field composed of different solid objects stationed at different distances in space, or of two stereoscopic pictures, may be seen in perspective when illuminated by the light of an electric spark. Since the duration of this spark is perhaps not more than 2r!o"o sec., it is plain that no change of convergence, or running back and forth of the point of regard, has time to take place. It is asserted by Le Conte 2 that the interpretation of the double images depends upon the fact that such images of any object are different according as the object lies nearer or more remote than the point of regard. In the latter case, the double images are called " homonymous," and are united by less convergence ; in the former case they are called " heteronymous," and are united by greater convergence of the optic axes. Now the observer knows, "instinctively and without trial" whether greater or less optic convergence will be necessary to unite the double images ; and accordingly refers the homony- mous images to objects beyond, the heteronymous images to objects this side of, the point of regard.- But the question arises, How does this so-called " instinctive " knowledge come? It can scarcely be by way of a native insight into the distinction between homony- mous and heteronymous images, as such ; or through any seeing of both retinal images by the mind's eye, 3 as it were. Since what is needed to unite the images is motion of the eye, and since the mind has always been accustomed to associate sensations of motion with the double images of binocular vision, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that instantaneous binocular vision, like monocular vision, of solidity and distance, is secondary and wholly dependent upon previous experience acquired with both eyes in motion. 20. Localizing of the third dimension is, accordingly, much more secure in binocular than in monocular vision ; and judgments of distance are assisted greatly by movements of both eyes. If 1 Archives des Sciences, iii. (1858), p. 142. 2 Sight, p. 151 ; and Am. Journal of Science and Arts, ii., 1871, p. 425. 3 To say that "each eye, as it were, knows its own image, although such knowledge does not emerge into distinct consciousness," is in plain contradic- tion with all the fundamental laws which psychology has to propound con- cerning the nature of visual perception. INTERPRETATION OF DOUBLE IMAGES. 443 no other motif for seeing depth of space is present, according to Hering l the following law seems to hold : All the lines or points whose images lie, with a given position of the point of regard, in the vertical horopter, appear clearly defined on a surface which is either plane or slightly cylindrical, and all the lines or points lying this side of the surface of the vertical horopter and whose images have a " crossed disparateness " (that is, the left one of the double im- ages belongs to the right eye, and the right one to the left eye making them " heteronyrnous "), appear in front of the surface ; while those lying beyond the horopter and whose images have an " uncrossed disparateness " (that is, the right image belongs to the right eye, and the left image to the left eye making them " hom- onymous "), appear behind the surface on which whatever lies in the horopter is seen. But, as we have already learned, interpreta- tion of the double images for the stationary eyes is an acquired art, which is dependent upon previous association of the retinal signs of both eyes with muscular sensations arising from the innervation and movement of the eyes. It is also in perfection of practice de- pendent, as all stereoscopic vision is, upon the so-called " second- ary " means of such vision. 21. All stereoscopic vision, or vision of perspective for remote objects, requires, in order to secure any considerable accuracy, the larger use of " secondary helps." Five or more classes of such helps may be mentioned. Vision, as accomplished by such means, is often called judgment in distinction from immediate perception. This should not be held to imply that activity of the mind in as- sociation and discernment is not involved in all the presentations of sense. The distinction lies between such a synthesis of the sensa- tions into objects of sense as is inseparably connected with all nor- mal binocular vision, and such other seeing (or judging) of the spa- tial properties and relations of remote objects as depends for its accuracy upon changing aspects of these objects. The increased necessity for secondary helps when the objects of vision are remote arises largely from the fact that the mind loses the data (or motifs) that accompany strong convergence and accommodation of the nor- mal eye for near objects. Changes in the tone and intensity of the muscular sensations are comparatively slight on passing from vision of objects 20-40 feet distant to vision at infinite distance. On the contrary, such changes are relatively great on converging the eyes to alter the point of regard from a distance of 20-40 feet to one of 5-6 inches ; still greater on increasing the convergence for still nearer vision. Hence the increased necessity, in vision of distant 1 Physiolog. Optik, Hermann's Handb. d. Physio!., III., i., 400 f. 444 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. objects, for other secondary helps to take the place, as it were, of the diminished value of the primary data or motifs of the eye. 22. The principal secondary helps of stereoscopic vision and vision of perspective are the following : ' The course of the limiting lines of the objects in the field of vision determines our perception of their distance and form as lying in the third dimension of space. In looking at a building, we connect together into vertical, horizon- tal, or curved wholes, the successive fragments of the images of its lines as the eyes are swept along in the requisite directions. If these lines become confused in distinctness, or changed into direc- tions that are contrary to our previous experience of how the parts of a building appear to the eye, we are liable to errors in per- ception. When the bottom lines of a distant object are covered, its distance and shape in the third dimension become uncertain to the eye. Mountains that tower behind each other seem to lie in one surface, provided the presence of other secondary helps, such as atmospheric perspective, etc., is excluded. The parts of un- shaded geometrical figures drawn on a plane where the course of their outlines does not define the matter to us as fixed in one way, may often receive two or more interpretations ; they may thus actually appear as subject to change from a nearer to a more re- mote place in space. The same arrangement of lines may appear either as a staircase or a portion of an overhang- ing wall (see Fig. 102). The same angle of a poly- gon may be made to seem either the nearest or the most remote. Indeed, the whole stereoscopy of certain figures may thus easily be reversed. But if the course of the limit- ing lines of an object for- bids more than one interpretation of the relations of its parts in the third dimension of space, then the object must be seen as in- terpreted in that one way. Objects of known size and shape are seen as nearer or remote, according to the manner in which the parts cover each other and are covered by each other. The con- tour of an object, then, is one determining factor of its stereoscopic appearance (see Fig. 103). 1 Comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 145 f.; and Helmholtz, Phys- iolog. Optik, pp. 622 ff. and 766 ff. FIG. 102 (From Wundt). a can be made to appear either nearer or farther off than b. INFLUENCE OF SECONDARY HELPS. 445 Mathematical perspective, or the size of the angle of vision which is covered by near and far objects respectively, is one of the most important secondary helps of stereoscopic vision and vision of per- spective. In this way objects of known size are seen as placed at a distance necessary to give them their apparent size. The street appears narrower and more distant, the houses lower and more re- mote, in the upper part of its visual picture. Parallel lines, like the tracks of a railway, appear to converge from us more and more toward a point ; the same thing is true of the sides of the table or box at one end of which we are standing, or of the walls of the Fia. 103 (From Wundt). The two rings A and B may be stereoscopically combined in either of the following ways according as the vertical or horizontal contours prevail. room. For although the perspective of visual experience is very different from true " mathematical perspective," the latter affords to the former one of the secondary helps. More distant objects are also, on account of the amount of atmos- phere through which the rays of light reflected from them have to pass, more dim in outline and of changed shades of color. Such alterations in the character of the image furnish another of the secondary helps of our vision of perspective. Accordingly, things are seen nearer in a clear atmosphere, more distant in one less clear. This is sometimes called " aerial perspective." The size and direction of the shadows also furnish data for the 446 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. perception of the distance and shape in the third dimensions of vis- ual objects. In the morning and evening light, when all shadows are lengthened, the objects of the landscape appear more distant from us and from each other. The direction of the shadows of different objects with relation to each other and to the source from which the light comes is also an aid to vision of perspective. The arrangement of the lights and shadows is by far the most impor- tant means for determining the relative position in space of differ- ent parts of objects like intaglios or medallions. A change of the arrangement of the lights and shadows of such an object, so as to substitute the one for the other throughout, converts an intaglio into a medallion or bas-relief, and vice versa. A medallion, placed near a window, but shielded from its direct light, and lighted from the other side by reflection from a mirror, has its relief reversed. 23. Other secondary helps to stereoscopic vision and vision of perspective are derived from experience in a still more indirect way. Within certain limits we see what we know to be in the field of vision ; but, on the other hand, we are not infrequently compelled to see what we know cannot be there. The account of such phenomena depends upon laws of association and reproduc- tion, the physical basis for which is exceedingly obscure. Since the ultimate psycho-physical processes take place in the brain ; and since the central processes come under the law of habit and are in part determined by the tendencies embedded, as it were, in the structure and customary functions of the central mechanism ; the influence of changes in the peripheral organs of vision, the shape and clearness of the retinal image, etc., cannot always deter- mine just what the presentation of sight will be. Many retinal images admit of two or more interpretations which in- terpretation will be chosen depends upon a variety of circumstances that perhaps cannot all be accurately denned. The few lines drawn upon the black- board, or employed by the skilful etch- er, cause us to see what is not, but rather ought to be, in the image formed no. m-F^st one, then the other upon the retina. Anyone accustomed to stud ying tne effect of tlie C( > lorecl points and outlines which appear in the image seen with closed eyes by the retina's own light, knows how apparently lawless is the interpretation given to this image. This is especially true when attention is somewhat relaxed as, for exam- INFLUENCE OF EXPERIENCE. 447 pie, on sinking into re very or sleep. Much of the "stuff" out of which the usual phenomena of dreams are made, may be suggested and controlled by the condition of the "retinal field." In all these cases, only a sharper attention and more objective view of things is needed to dispel the illusion and make us aware how scanty is the schema, as it were, out of which, by association and reproduction, we have constructed our presentations of sense. Similar experiences not infrequently occur even with open eyes by day, in the dimly lighted room, or in the obscurer nooks and recesses of vision on the street. In this way numberless ghosts and apparitions have been most per- spicuously seen. The face of a friend whom we know to be thou- sands of miles distant may look at us from the window of a house ; it is only after persistently trying to interpret the appearance in ac- cordance with our knowledge that we finally succeed in resolving the face into some chance combination of lights and shadows, of window-sash, curtain, or other objects. 24. Phenomena like the foregoing recall once more the gen- eral office of experience in determining the existence and character of particular presentations of visual sense. We have seen that the strife between the two rival theories of the origin and development of sense-perception concerns the relative amount of what is to be counted "native," on the one hand, or accredited to a process of " learning " how to perceive on the other hand. The analysis of the mind's data or motifs has made it apparent that the influence of experience through the association and repro- duction of its past forms is very great over the presentations of sense. 1 The mind sees, not simply according to the objective character of so-called " things," nor simply according to the retinal images as connected with sensations of motions, but also accord- ing to its custom in seeing. When, therefore, its habits are broken up for the time, its interpretation of the sensations, as well as its synthesis of them into recognized objects of sense, is liable to be disturbed. Various experiments impress this truth in a vivid way. For example, let one regard, with one eye, the reversed picture of a landscape or the photograph of a friend turned upside down after covering up nearly all of it except the face. The effect of the pseudoscope, or optical instrument, which, by exchanging the two stereoscopic pictures, changes convex into concave, and vice versa, when applied to a complicated scene of landscape, streets, etc., is very bewildering. The data with which the mind has been wont 1 Comp. the chapter,' Der Einfluss der Erfahrungsmotive auf die Localisi- rung, in Heriug's Physiolog. Optik, Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., IIL, i., pp. 564 ff. 448 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. to deal may all be given, and the sensations localized according to the laws of stereoscopic vision, but the relation of the parts is in- explicable out of any previous experience. Similar effects are pro- duced by the telestereoscope, 1 or optical instrument which enables us to see a larger portion of a distant object than is possible with two ordinary eyes, after the fashion of a pair of optical organs in the sides of a gigantic head. Individual peculiarities of localizing, such as are acquired by the practice of some trade or art, are also accounted for under the principle of influence from experience over those elements of reproduction that determine what object of sense shall be constructed out of the various sensational data at command. Indeed, all our estimates of visual size, shape, and distance, as well as our " errors of sense," can be understood only in the light of this same general principle. 25. Not only what we know, but what we choose, has an influ- ence often a determining one upon what we see. This is true, not simply because we can at will, within certain limits, decide the area of the field of vision over which the point of regard shall move, as well as the parts of this area upon which it shall be fixated, but also because we can regulate the amount of attention which shall be given to visual impressions and the manner of the distribution of attention over the various parts of these impressions. Further- more, it often lies with us to say how we will interpret the data, and so see the complex product resulting from the act of mental synthesis. This is especially true of geometrical figures in outline, as in the cases already referred to under another head ( 22). 26. With the use of the foregoing data, and under the guidance of past experience, we judge of the spatial extension and relations of lines, angles, and solid bodies, of their shape, size, distance, and relative situation. The position of lines and angles affects our es- timate of their magnitude ; under this principle many errors of sense originate. Distance and size are, of course, so related that they vary inversely, and when one is known the other is immediately or readily judged on the basis of such knowledge. But the size of the visual object is measured by the magnitude of the visor angle covered by its image, or the relative extent of the retinal surface simultaneously excited by the rays of light reflected from the object. This is called its " apparent magnitude." The real magnitude of any object is its size as related to certain fixed standards of measurement formed on the basis of generalizations from the use of both eye and hand. Dis- tance, apparent magnitude, and real magnitude, are therefore con- 1 See Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, p. 646 f., for an account of these two in- struments. INFLUENCE OF INTENSITY. 449 nected as three factors of one problem proposed by each presentation of sight. Given the apparent magnitude and the real magnitude of an object, we judge of the distance according to our experience of how large an object of such size appears at an assumed distance. The remote spot on which a human figure is standing seems nearer or farther away according as we know the figure to be that of a man or that of a boy. Distance and apparent magnitude being given, the real magnitude of the object is judged as that which it would need to have in order to appear so large at the given dis- tance. When one of the two necessary data is lacking, no judg- ment can be formed except upon the basis of other secondary helps, such as aerial perspective, etc. Thus, no common standard for es- timating the distance of the sun or moon being given, their size ap- pears different according to the place where different observers are inclined to locate them, or according to the standard of comparison made necessary for the time by their position. These bodies ordi- narily appear to some persons no larger than a saucer, to others larger than a large cart-wheel. When the sun sets behind a tree, the size of the spreading of whose branches is fairly well known, it may be enormously magnified by being seen to fill its branches en- tirely. 27. When the eye is in motion, as in all ordinary vision of ob- jects not very minute and very near, the number, duration, and in- tensity of the spatial series of sensations called forth by the motion determine our estimate of the outline-form, magnitude, and dis- tance of the objects. 1 Every spatial series of sensations contrib- utes the larger magnitude to the object the greater the number of members which enter into the series. For this reason the same extension of a line or surface when broken up into parts by inter- secting lines appears larger than when perceived as an uninter- rupted whole. The repetition of similar figures in architecture, upon walls, columns, etc., takes advantage of this effect. The intensity of the sensations of a spatial series, and of the act of attention necessary to comprehend them in one whole as a pres- entation of sense, also has an influence on the size of the object. When the movements of the eyes are made with lamed or tired muscles, the size of the thing perceived by them is increased. When the function of one of the muscles (for example, the rectus externus) is impaired, so that the circuit of the eye in a given direc- tion is shortened, objects lying at any position in the field of vi- sion, as seen by the eye moving in the shortened circuit, are located where they would have been if the same intensity of muscular sen- 'Comp. Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologie, 1885, II, pp. 99 ff. 29 450 BINOCULAR FIELD OP SIGHT. sation had been necessary to bring them to this position with a normal function of the muscles. A patient with paralysis which prevents turning the eye more than 20 will locate an object actually lying only 20 from the median plane much farther to one side. Such a patient will reach beyond w r hen he tries to grasp the visual object. The increased size which is given to objects that are parti-colored or mottled, and so have an interrupted sur- face and furnish greater difficulty to perception of them as wholes, may be due to both the foregoing causes. Volkmann von Volk- mar ' calls attention to the fact that both monotony and variety may, under the working of these principles, be productive of the same effect in magnifying the size of an object. For the size of any visual surface is usually estimated by the application of some standard of measurement selected from the field of vision. The frequent repetition of this standard creates the impression of vast- ness ; and the absence of any standard to apply, or a vague, unsuc- cessful effort to find a standard, may produce the same impression. Monotonous areas of unbroken snow, and stretches of streets crowded with forms of men and animals, both seem of great ex- tent. The amount of time through which the spatial series of sensa- tions endure has also an influence on the magnitude of the objects perceived through those sensations. It is as enduring in time that the changing qualities and quantities of sensation which belong- to the perception of any complex object are expressed. The length of the time-course, as well as the degree of the intensity of the spa- tial series of sensations, may be interpreted as extensive magnitude of the perceived object. 28. The laws which control our estimates of visual magnitudes are psychological, and apply to all the action of the mind in con- structing its sense-data into the presentations of sense. Yet more elaborate mental activities, such as take place when the distance, size, and contour of visual objects are deliberately estimated and expressed in terms of an accepted standard, of course imply more of dependence upon skill acquired through experience. The degree of fineness with which differences of distance and magnitude can be seen, under the most favorable circumstances, is limited by the least observable differences in the members of the spatial series of sensations which compose the visual objects. Of such series, those most capable of exceedingly fine differentiation are the local retinal signs and the muscular sensations accompan} 7 - ing convergence of the eyes for near distances. It is difficult 1 Lehrb. d. Psychologie, II., p. 101 f. MEASURING POWER OF THE EYE. 451 to assign the exact proportion of help which these two series ren- der in making the finest possible distinctions of visual magnitude. Hering ' denies that any help is obtained from muscular sensations, or "feelings of innervation," in comparing the size of two minute objects near by, and assigns all the work of furnishing such data to the " spatial sense of the retina." Lotze, 2 who admitted the as- sistance of muscular sensations, nevertheless held that the fineness of the distinctions possible among them is not sufficient to support our ordinary judgments of the size, distance, and direction of ob- jects. Wundt 3 and others claim that it is by gradations in the so- called " feelings of innervation " alone that we make the most accu- rate of these estimates ; they deny that any " spatial sense " (in Bering's meaning of the words) belongs to the retina. The evi- dence seems to favor the view that both the muscular sensations and the local retinal signs furnish data for all nice discrimination of visual extension. The particular degree of accuracy with which minute differences in the distance and magnitude of visual objects can be perceived varies greatly, according to different positions of the eyes and the* object, the amount of light, practice, etc. and all these, as con- nected with individual peculiarities of structure and previous func- tion of the organs of sense. That such estimates fall to some extent under Weber's law in other words, that the least observable dif- ference in the length of visual lines and surfaces is relative and not absolute has already been shown (Chap. V., 18). Chodin found the relative value of the least observable difference, with a variation of the absolute vertical distance from 2.5 to 160 mm., to be as follows when the lines lie in the same direction : Absolute distance. . 2.5 5 10 20 40 80 160mm. Fraction of observ- ? i i i i i iiiiiiiii able difference. [ ' 7 "~" 2ff 29-32 TT-TS Tf.TT TT-TJS ro-T* 43-30 The fineness of ocular judgment is greater for horizontal dis- tances. The measuring power of the eye is much less accurate when the distances compared lie in different directions. In particular, points lying at a vertical distance of 20 mm. are estimated as equally far away with those lying at a horizontal distance of 25 mm. 4 Most estimates of direction and distance are comparatively inaccurate when only one eye is used. A vertical line drawn at right angles to 1 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 533 f. 'Medicin. Psychologic, 384 f. 3 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., pp. 85 flP. ; comp. i., pp. 375 ff. 4 So Wundt found, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii. , p. 96. 452 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. a horizontal appears bent to monocular vision ; its apparent inclina- tion is variable, and was found by Bonders l to vary between 1 and 3 of the angle within a short time. Helmholtz 2 experimented to determine the accuracy of the bi- nocular perception of depth by trying how small a deviation from a perfectly straight line could be detected in a wire bent at one point so that its two halves formed an extremely obtuse angle, when the wire was looked at both in and out of the horopteric line ; he also employed for the same purpose three nails, the heads of which could be very slightly displaced from a straight line. Under the most favorable circumstances, he found that a displacement of a nail by a change of its distance corresponding to 60^ seconds of the angle of vision, or 0.0044 mm. variation in the position of the retinal image, could be detected. The latter distance corresponds so well to the calculated size of the retinal elements (see p. 327) as to form an argument in favor of the theory that estimates of size and dis- tance are dependent upon the local signs attached to the excitation of these elements. But, on the other hand, it is claimed that Weber 3 showed the muscular sense of the eye to be one of the finest of micrometric apparatuses, since a distinct muscular sensation is attached to a displacement of the most sensitive spot of the retina of not more than -^y of a Parisian line. By experimenting with a black thread stretched over against a white wall and moved in the median plane toward and from both eyes, which looked at it through a horizon- tal slit in an upright board, it was found possible to detect changes in distance of 3.5 ctm. at an absolute distance of 180 ctm., and changes of 1 ctm. at an absolute distance of 60 ctm. 4 29. The data or motifs already described are the foundation, also, of our perceptions of motion, and of our estimates of its di- rection, speed, and extent. It need scarcely be said that all such perceptions and estimates are relative ; they imply the existence of some point which may be regarded as fixed, and the application of a standard of measurement. For perceptions of motion by the eye, the point of regard when the organ is in the primary position furnishes the means of orientating ourselves and of placing the dif- ferent things of vision in their right relations to us and to each other. Suppose the body and head to be erect, and the eyes motion- 1 Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, XXI., iii., p. 100 f. 2 See Physiolog. Optik, p. 644 f. 3 In the Ber. d. sachs. Gesells., etc., for 1852, p. 130; cited by Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologic., II., p. 56. 4 See Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., 94 f., and the reference there. THE PERCEPTION OF MOTION. 453 less and looking into the distance with the lines of vision parallel ; the perception of motion may then arise in either one of two ways. Of these, by far the most frequent is the change of relative position of an object in the field of vision which is occasioned by its move- ment. What is necessary, however, is simply the successive stimu- lation of continuous points or areas of the retina with images that are sufficiently similar to be perceived as one object. The percep- tion of motion may also be produced by the successive stimulation of the same points or areas of the retina with images that are too dissimilar to be regarded as one object. One may thus see motion when neither the eyes nor any external objects are really moved. It is in the latter way that the colored points of the images formed by the retina's own light, when the eyes are closed and motionless, seem to be in constant motion. The direction and amount of motion perceived with the eyes is measured off upon the entire field of vision in accordance with pre- vious experience and by means of the data already described. With the eyes at rest, the retinal local signs, or space-values belonging to the retinal elements, furnish the only primary data ; secondary helps, and associated ideas of muscular sensations which have been by experience found necessary to follow objects in motion, complete the perception. It is assumed, in cases like the foregoing, that no sensations in- dicating motion of either the organ of vision, or the head, or the whole body, complicate the problem. But ordinary perceptions of motion are gained with the eyes in motion out of the primary position. When the eye and the object both move in such a way that the point of regard remains fixed on the object, our percep- tions of motion, and estimates of its direction and magnitude are dependent upon muscular and tactual sensations occasioned by the eye's changes of position. We know from experience what kinds and intensities of sensations are produced by keeping the point of regard fixed on an object which is moving at about a given rate in a given direction. If any of the links ordinarily belonging to this chain of conscious experiences drop out, our measuring instru- ment fails us either partially or completely. The head, too, is in- variably turned when we are watching an object that is moving in any direction other than straight forward or away from us along the line of regard. The sensations originating in the action of the muscles and skin of the head and neck thus enter into our compu- tation ; they must have such a value in consciousness as to inform us about how far the head has gone from the position with which it started, in order to fixate the moving object. According to 454 BINOCULAR FIELD OF SIGHT. Helmholtz, 1 the ordinary movements of the head in vision follow the same principle as that followed by the eyes in movement ; that is to say, the head turns from its primary position on an axis that is approximately parallel to the axis of the simultaneous rotation of the eyes. But Hering 2 asserts that a difference between the laws of the motion of head and eyes is of essential significance for our perception of space. However this may be, it is certain that the position and motion of the head, as known by its muscular and tactual sensations, must be taken account of in all ordinary visual perception of motion. The same thing is true of the position and motion of the entire body. Many of our errors of sense, or false perceptions of motion its existence, direction, rate, and amount are dependent upon the principles of judgment governing such data of sensations. We are peculiarly liable to error in all cases where the motions of our own bodily organs are passive ; in such cases we do not have the ordinary motifs, or data, at our command. Objects are perceived at rest, either when, our organs of vision being themselves at rest, the images of the objects do not change their position in the field of vision, or when sensations of motion occasioned by moving these organs are such and so great as we know by experience correspond to (or compensate for) the changes in the position of their images which are occasioned by their actu- ally remaining at rest. But whenever we look with moving eyes upon a number of objects arranged in fixed position with relation to each other, a conflict between two sets of data really takes place. The result with respect to our perceptions of motion may depend upon which of the two is chiefly effective in arresting attention. When the eyes are brought from the parallel position, which they assume in vision of remote objects, to convergence upon some near object, the two fields of view belonging to the two eyes rotate in opposite directions, while the middle visual line maintains its posi- tion in the median plane. 3 Ordinarily we do not perceive this rotary motion of the two fields of vision, but consider the field as one and stationary and ourselves as changing our point of regard in it. By attention, however, we may see that the external objects, although they really continue at rest, appear to move as the rela- tions of their double images are changed. So, also, when the eye or head or body turns in either direction, in order that a new ob- ject may be brought under regard, it is possible either to perceive or not to perceive the entire field of objects sweeping by ; which 1 Physiolog. Optik, p. 486. * In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., p. 495. 3 See Le Conte, Sight, p. 229. VISION AS INTERPRETATION. 455 of the two happens depends upon the direction in which attention is drawn. When strictly attending to the phenomena, we cannot well fail to regard everything as moving in the opposite direc- tion from that in which we know the organ of vision to be turn- ing. 30. The principles already laid down also suffice to explain most of the ordinary " errors of sense," as well as certain extraor- dinary experiences of a somewhat different kind. The right to speak of errors of sense has been questioned. It has been claimed that such errors belong rather to judgment, and that sense pure and simple cannot err. The claim is based upon a misunderstand- ing of the nature of perception. A very obvious difference exists, indeed, between a mistaken estimate of the distance of a mountain through extraordinary clearness of atmosphere and the seeing of a square of white paper as green on a red ground, or as yellow on a blue ground. But the latter is surely an "error of sense" or sensation, in as pure form as such error is conceivable. That sense cannot err is true only in case we speak of unlocalized and unpro- jected sensation, regarded as not predicating anything beyond itself. In all presentations of sense a certain psychological judgment is involved ; for all such presentations imply association of impres- sions discriminated as similar or dissimilar, and a mental synthesis which is dependent upon attention and the interpretation of certain motifs or data according to past experiences. Clear vision is always mental interpretation. The attempt to assign the relative amount of blame to sense and to intellect, in cases where our presentations of sense do not rep- resent objective relations of things, assumes an ability to make dis- tinctions which we do not possess. Moreover, the distinction, when made as the objection would have it, will not hold. Innumerable experiences contradict the statement that immediate sense-percep- tion cannot err. When one sees (with no power to see otherwise) a gigantic human form through the fog, or projected against the scenery of a stage, and yet judges that this form is only of usual size, the error is not one of judgment, but just the reverse. JE/rrors of sense are only special instances where the mind makes its syn- thesis unfortunately, as it were, out of incomplete data, instantane- ously and inevitably interpreting them in accordance with the laws which have regulated all its experience. As Lotze has remarked, " The whole of our apprehension of the world by the senses is one great and prolonged deception." Objects of sense are in no case exact copies of ready-made things which exist extra-mentally just as they are afterward perceived, and which get themselves 456 ERRORS OF VISUAL PERCEPTION. copied off in the mind by making so-called impressions upon it ; they are mental constructions. In the special case of sight we have seen that, in every particular in its elements, its mode of con- struction, its laws of change the field of vision is a subjective af- fair. The case is in no respect essentially different, whether our presentations of sense are so-called errors or true images of things. In both cases the same data and laws of the use of these data main- tain themselves. Errors of sense, however, are distinguished from hallucinations, because the former result from the activity of an organism which is normal in structure and function, while the lat- ter do not. 31. The errors of visual perception are almost innumerable ; they may be classified in part, however, according as they fall under some one or other of the before-mentioned principles. Such errors may be called "normal, "because they are committed in accordance with principles which regulate the ordinary activity of the mind in making its synthesis by the help of the sense-data or motifs fur- nished to it through the excitement of the organism. Deceptions of this class really result, then, from the fidelity of both mind and nervous system. Certain errors of sense, for example, are special examples of the working of the laws which regulate the correspond- ence of the two images in binocular vision. Thus, near objects erroneously appear double when the eye is adjusted for distant vision, distant objects when it is adjusted for near vision ; solid things are seen through other solid things ; relations in space in general are perceived different from the reality ; and all according to the law of the correspondence and non-correspondence of the two retinal images. Accordingly, the inquiry, Why is vision single when it is performed with two eyes ? can demand and receive only one answer. A chief condition of the single vision of solid objects is that they shall be seen with two eyes. Whether anything what- ever is seen as two or one does not depend, primarily, upon its really being either two or one, or upon the existence of one or two retinal images of it (as though such images were directly perceived) ; it rather depends upon the appropriate data of sensations being furnished to the -mind for completing its mental synthesis of the object. The two eyes being simultaneously affected in a certain way, these data are supplied. What is one is seen as one, and what is two is seen as one, and what is one is seen as two all in essentially the same way. A still larger class of errors of the visual sense falls under the laws which regulate the smallest observable differences in the muscular sensations as related to the mathematical perspective of COMPAEISON OF MAGNITUDES. 457 lines, angles, and surfaces. 1 Reference has already been made to the working of this principle in our ordinary perceptions of the visual magnitude, contour, and distance of objects. Vertical distances are regularly perceived as larger FlG 105 than equally large horizontal distances. On trying to draw a cross with limbs of equal length one is apt to get the vertical dimension too small ; exact squares are likely to appear higher than their -H- FIG. 106. breadth. When comparing magnitudes in the upper part of the field of vision with those in its lower part, one is likely to over- estimate the former. The upper and lower half of a letter " S " or a figure " 8 " appear of nearly the same size ; but when they are inverted ("g " and " g ") the difference in the size of the two halves becomes magnified. Under the same prin- ciple in part at least may those errors be brought which are FIG. 107. FIG. 108. determined by the way in which the field of vision is filled up. If the horizontal distance between two points be exactly half filled with a line, this line will ap- pear longer than the remain- ing empty space. A square intersected by parallel hori- zontal lines appears elongat- ed upward, but one intersect- ed by parallel vertical lines appears elongated sideways. If one of the two right angles formed by drawing a vertical perpendicular to a horizontal line be filled with several lines diverging from the point of the an- 1 Comp. Wundt's discussion of such cases, Physiolog. Psychologie, II., pp. 92 ff. FIG. 109. 458 EERORS OF VISUAL PERCEPTION. gle, the angle thus filled will appear the larger and the perpendic- ular will seem bent. For essentially the same reason, when two unequal angles together make 180, the obtuse angle appears rela- Fio. 111. Fio. 112. tively too small, and the acute angle relatively too large. Many surprising errors of sense result from the varied applications of this principle. (See the Figs, on p. 457 f.) THE ILLUSIONS OF ART. 459 FIG. 113. 32. The influence of experience, which often corrects what would otherwise be an instinctive interpretation of the data fur- nished to the mind, is at other times the cause of errors. If the data will at all permit it, we incline to perceive any object as we know that similar objects are usually perceived. Such errors of sense as result from the vision of distant objects through secondary helps are too well known and frequently remarked upon to require extended treatment. All the pleasant illusions of art in archi- tecture, drawing, and paint- ing are obliged constantly to take them into account. The very relations of light and shade, the conjunction, separation, and covering of lines and surfaces, upon which reliance is ordinarily placed for perception of fact, may be employed by either nature or art to compel us to perceive what is contrary to fact. Painting is successful according to the skill it displays in furnishing to the eye its customary data so as to entice it to regard things as other than they really are. That its success is so good need not surprise us, when we remember that the mind has never anything more than these same data out of which to construct its objects of sense and to make its various judgments concerning them. The many errors in our perceptions of motion may, for the most part, be explained in the same way. It matters not whether the data for such perceptions are furnished by actual changes in the relative position of things in external space, or whether the same sensations arise through changes confined to the organs of sense. Past experience has great influence in all this domain. We incline for this reason, when two objects are chang- ing their relative position, to perceive the smaller of them as in motion ; we also over-estimate the speed of small bodies in motion, and under-estimate that of large bodies. 33. Some errors of visual perception differ from the foregoing in that their explanation seems to be due to cerebral activity under other laws as yet unknown to us. We have already seen (Chap. IV., 14) that the phenomena of contrast of colors must be referred 460 ERRORS OF VISUAL PERCEPTION. to certain inexplicable activities of the central organs as related to our sensations or states of consciousness. The same thing is ap- parently true of those errors of sense which occur in connection with the strife and prevalence of contours, and the binocular mixing and contrast of colors. If a well-defined image of some contour, such as a sharp-marked limit between two differently colored sur- faces, be formed on one retina, and on the corresponding points of the other the image of a uniform-colored background, then only the former will be visible. This is called the " prevalence of contours." But if the contours of the images of two differently colored objects run on the retina so as to cross only in one place, then sometimes one color and sometimes the other will prevail and get itself per- ceived at that place. This is called "the strife of contours." If two squares of red paper and two of blue, all of equal size and bright- ness and without any distinguishing marks, be laid side by side at equal distances, and their images then combined, the color of the middle one of the binocular images will at first be sometimes red- der and sometimes bluer than that of the two side images, but in no case exactly like either of them. By steady looking it is said to be possible to mix the colors of the two objects in a binocular image which is reddish blue (or violet). 1 This is called "the bi- nocular mixing of colors." If such a deception can be secured, it is manifest that the mixing of colors on which it depends must take place in the brain, and not upon the retinas of the two eyes. If a white stripe be placed upon a black surface and divided into two images, the right one of which is formed by looking at one half through blue glass, the left by looking through gray glass, then the right image will be seen blue, but the left will be seen yellow. This is called " binocular contrast of colors." The peculiar perception of luminosity is due to a struggle be- tween the two fields of vision which results, not in combining the black images of one field with the white images of the other so as to produce an equal tint of gray, but in a rapid alternation of the two. Very smooth bodies, when they reflect the light perfectly, do not appear luminous. But when the surface of such bodies as, for example, the surface of a sheet of water becomes ruffled by ripples, it becomes luminous. The perception of luminosity may be produced by combining two stereoscopic pictures of an object which are alike in contour, but one of which is black with white lines where the other is white with black lines. Two such pictures not combining to produce an equal tint of gray over the 1 So Hering asserts, Physiolog. Optik, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III. , i. , p. 592. Binocular mixing of colors lias been denied by some authorities. LAWS OF CEKEBKAL ACTION. 461 whole surface, the images of the separate points on the two retinas enter into a struggle with each other ; and the rapid alternation of the prevalence, first of one and then of the other, gives rise to the appearance of luminosity. Such phenomena as the foregoing seem to require a reference to certain unknown processes in the central organs as a physical basis for the psychical experience. Some experimenters claim that in these cases of contrast they are able to see either color at will by giving attention, first to the image on one retina, and then to that on the other. The words in which this claim is couched, however, afford no explanation of the phenomena ; for, we repeat again, the mind does not see the image on the retina, and cannot direct spe- cial attention to it. It can only attend to this or that feature of the "presentation of sense," which is in every case a subjective affair. But the very question that we are unable to answer con- cerns the reason why the presentations of sense are constructed as they are in such cases ; the reply, so far as any reply can be given, must be, that such data or motifs furnished by the spatial series of sensations as we cannot connect with known laws of the peripheral organs of sense must be referred to unknown laws of the central or- gans of the same sense. Apparently this truth holds good of certain optical illusions of motion. The fact that a steady succession of im- ages (as in the case of watching a fall of water), passing over a partic- ular region of the retina for a long time, sometimes ceases to be per- ceived as a motion, and that the image of a stationary body on the same retinal region may appear to be moving in the opposite direc- tion, has been explained by "Thomson's law." This law refers the phenomena to the principle of fatigue. Recent investigations, how- ever, seem to show that the explanation is incorrect. They bring out the 'remarkable result that the same elements of the retina, when stimulated simultaneously, may give rise to impressions both of motion and of rest. For this result some unknown law of cere- bral action would seem to afford the only possible explanation. 1 34. The fact that things are seen upright and in correct relations horizontally, by means of data furnished through inverted retinal images, as well as all illusions and errors that are connected with this normal fact, implies yet more maturity of experience. Why do we see the upper part of the object by means of the lower part of the retinal image, and vice versa f and why do we see the right side of the object by means of the left side of the retinal image, and vice versa ? Such questions have often been propounded as psycho- logical puzzles of special difficulty. The only answer possible fol- 1 See Journal of Physiology, iii. , p. 299 f . 462 DEVELOPMENT OF VISUAL PERCEPTION. lows, obviously, from the foregoing principles. Strictly speaking, we neither see the external object nor the retinal image ; the field of vision is a subjective affair, and is like neither of these two. The presentation of visual sense is normally dependent upon the retinal image for the data from which it is constructed ; the image is dependent upon the external object for its formation by rays of light reflected from the object and converged upon the nervous elements of the retina. The different parts of the object as seen are primarily localized simply with reference to each other by means of local retinal signs and of muscular sensations produced by motion of the eyes. But as yet the field of vision has no locality in objective space ; no part of it can be said to be either up or down, either right or left. The use of such terms of position implies an association of localized sensations of sight with those of touch and of the muscular sense, in giving us a picture of the relation of the different parts of the body to each other, and of the entire body to the ground, the sky, and the various parts of sur- rounding objects. When the eyes are moved downward, the lower parts of the body and objects situated on the ground successively come into the field of vision ; when the eyes are moved upward, the near ground and lower parts of objects successively disappear from the field of vision, and remoter or higher objects come to view. Seeing objects to the right or to the left is accomplished by motion of the eyes in the corresponding direction. Right is the direction in which the right hand is placed from the middle of the body ; left is the direction in which the left hand is found. The massive feelings of touch and muscular sensation keep us informed of the general relation of our bodies to the earth and to objects on its surface. The head is the upper part, or part farthest away from the ground ; the feet are the lower part, or members of the body in contact with the ground. Thus we come to use terms for localized sensations of sight which, in this use of them, have no primary reference whatever to the field of vision in itself considered. 35. The nature of the " sense-data " which the mind has at its disposal for constructing its presentations of sense, and the psycho- physical laws which are followed in the process of construction, have been explained in such detail that little need be added con- cerning the development of visual perception. Visual space pre- sents itself to us as a coherent complex of sensations of light and color systematically arranged. The arrangement implies certain native activities of the mind in connection with and dependence upon the action of the nervous organism ; but it also implies an immense influence from experience. It is extremely difficult, if not LEAENING TO LOCALIZE. 463 wholly impossible, to distinguish with confidence the limits which must be drawn between what is native and what is learned. The seeing of colors is undoubtedly a far more simple and primary act than the seeing of colored objects as situated in relation to each other in objective space. A colored surface, or a system of color- sensations related to each other as side by side in space-form, re- sults in experience from the weaving together of several spatial series of sensations. Such a surface may theoretically be conceived of as presented to the mind through the activity of the nervous elements belonging to the retina of a single motionless eye. The motifs or data which the mind would have for constructing such a surface must be found in the series of sensations of light and color as varying in intensity and quality according to the locally distinct nervous elements which are simultaneously excited. The evidence seems, on the whole, favorable to the assumption that some indefi- nite picture of visual space might be gained wholly through the excitation of a motionless nervous mosaic (like the retina) sensitive to light. But visual space, as experience makes it known to us, requires binocular vision with moving eyes. The firm spatial connection of all the parts requires that a system of lines of direction should be fixed, prescribing the objective points at which the sensations pro- duced by exciting together the different pairs of the covering points of the retina must appear in visual space. To establish such spatial connection, both eyes must move in their conjoined action as a single organ of vision. By this action the field of binocular vision is built up in an order of experience which, on the whole, consists in the successive mastery of more and more complex problems. For the process of learning to localize, the one centre the point of starting and the goal of return is the spot of clearest vision of the retina (the yellow-spot), to which the point of regard in the ob- ject corresponds. With the point of regard fixed in the primary position of the eye, the first and most essential means is gained for orientating objects in the field of vision. The meridians, horizontal and vertical, and the locations of different points in the surface of the field of vision thus presented to the mind, afford the compara- tively simple problems furnished by the primary position. In this way a central point, determining lines, and finally a continuous sur- face are fixed, to which may be referred all the directions and loca- tions of the binocular points and lines of regard in the secondary positions of the eye. The motifs or data which give to the mind its guidance in achieving its more difficult tasks are the spatial series of muscular 464 DEVELOPMENT OF PERCEPTION. and tactual sensations which are caused by the motions of the eye for parallel turning, for accommodation, and for convergence in near vision. The general principle is, that by motion the relative space-values of the retinal elements are not changed ; but their ab- solute values that is, the complex which is formed by combining all these muscular and tactual sensations with the local signs of the retina are changed in equal sense and measure. What moving the eyes does for the retinal images, moving the head and body does for the presentations of sense as constructed in binocular vision ; it alters the absolute values of the complex of sensation as related to objective space, while keeping the relative values belonging to the different positions of the eyes unchanged. The visual perception of depth involves a later and more complex training from experience than the perception of two-dimensioned extension. To solve the problem of depth, binocular vision with moving eyes, and its resulting combination and separation of the double images of objects, seems necessary. The existence and as- sistance of those secondary helps, which are so important in per- ceiving the solidity and distance of objects, imply a further devel- opment of experience. In all these advances, however, the course of acquisition is not in separate straight lines that run parallel or converge, as it were. More complex experience, when obtained, modifies what is really more simple and primary. What we see in monocular vision with an open eye, and even what we see with both eyes closed and motionless, depends upon what we have learned to see with both eyes in varied movement and availing themselves of all possible secondary helps. It also depends upon what we have learned to know of the nature and probable position and shape of manifold objects of which the eye has already attained the mastery. 36. Finally, brief mention must be made of the connections which are constituted, in the development of our perception of ob- jects as having the qualities and relations of space-form, by the joint action and mutual assistance of eye and hand. With the sense-presentations of one of these senses the images of objects as known by the other become most intimately related. It is a misuse of terms, however, and involves the entire subject in confusion, to speak of this joint product as a " sense-perception." It is rather to be spoken of as a mental image or concept. The visual presenta- tion of an object as, for example, a ball, a pen, a table may re- call its tactual presentation. We readily interpret one into terms of the other sight into terms of touch, and touch into terms of sight. But all the perceptions, as such, of spatial properties and relations, whether gained by eye or hand, are kept quite distinct TRANSLATION OF PERCEPTIONS. 465 and separable in the mind. No such synthesis takes place between the spatial series of the one sense and the spatial series of the other sense as takes place between the spatial series of the same sense. And all the properties and relations of bodies as known in space- form are given by each of these senses. The view which makes the sense of sight dependent upon the sense of touch and the muscu- lar sense for the construction of its spatial objects is erroneous. While feeling the pen, we can image how it would look ; when seeing it, how it would feel. We can image how much exertion would be required to reach a mountain which appears to the eye so far away, or how a mountain would look at a distance of so many miles as measured by the exertion required to walk there. But the true presentations of the visual objects and tactual objects do not mix in one combined perception. They unite only in one image or idea of the object. 37. Interesting experiments have been conducted to determine the degree of accuracy with which perceptions of distance by sight can be translated, as it were, into terms of the tactual and mus- cular sense. Some of these experiments show the amount of har- mony which can be obtained between optical localizing and localiz- ing with the finger. Helmholtz 1 made use of a vertical thread which he tried to locate, as seen in monocular vision, by hitting it with a pencil's point ; Donders, 2 of a very small induction-spark, which was to be touched with the index-finger. The result of 50 experiments, made for distances along the same line of regard vary- ing between 60 and 610 mm., when only the spark itself was seen in perfectly dark surroundings, showed that the distance was over- estimated 34 times, under-estimated 12, estimated right 4 times. The greatest errors were +35 and 34 mm. ; the mean error 10.6 mm. When the surroundings were visible and the electrodes seen with open eyes, the eyes then closed, and the finger reached to the estimated distance, the greatest errors were -f 30 and 12 mm., and the mean variable error 9.8 mm., for distances from 80 to 630 mm. The exact localizing of the point of regard in terms of touch is more difficult the farther the object is removed and the less assistance is had from secondary helps. Localizing in the same way when the object lies out of the line of regard is still more inaccurate. In 29 experiments, where the spark to be localized was flashed at a distance of 210-600 mm. to one side of this line, the greatest errors were +120 and 68 mm., with a mean error of about 34 mm. 1 Physiolog. Optik, p. 650. 2 Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, XVII., ii., p. 55. 466 DEVELOPMENT OF PERCEPTION. The problem of comparing the judgments of linear extension made by the eye, the hand, and the arm, and of determining their relative accuracy, has recently been examined, experimentally, at considerable length by J. Jastrow. 1 His method was to present a definite length, varying from 5 mm. to 120 mm., to the retina, the skin (by application of a pair of points, or by motion of a single point), to the forefinger and thumb (by being held between the two), or to the arm when in free movement and guiding a pencil to express its estimate. The subject of experiment was required to get a clear perception of the given distance by one of these organs (called, in such case, the " receiving sense "), and then either si- multaneously or successively express this perception through the same or some other one of these organs (the " expressing sense "). In this manner it was discovered that, if the eye is both receiving and expressing sense, small lengths will be under-estimated and large lengths exaggerated, the point where no error is made being at about 38 mm. ; whereas, if the hand is both receiving and ex- pressing, small lengths will be exaggerated and large lengths un- der-estimated, the "indifference-point" being at about 50 mm. ; but the arm exaggerates all lengths within the limits of the experi- ments. When, however, the eye expresses and the other organs receive the impression, all lengths are greatly under-estimated ; but if the hand is the expressing sense, all lengths are greatly exagger- ated. The arm as expressing sense exaggerates all lengths received by the eye, and under-estimates all received by the hand. The relative accuracy of the three senses, whether receiving or expressing, or both, stands in the order of eye, hand, arm the hand being only slightly better than the arm. The degree of confidence felt in the estimate made is naturally greatest where the accuracy is greatest. Inasmuch as " the expressing sense gives the charac- teristic properties to the curve of error," 2 the question arises whether all the phenomena cannot be accounted for by a special application of the law of habit in connection with the normal action of the sensory apparatus. Each sense, when expressing the esti- mate, tends tq approximate it in size toward those dimensions which it is most accustomed to judge accurately. All the foregoing results show plainly that the interpretation of visual distance in terms of the tactual and muscular sense is a mat- ter of complex experience, and is not usually more than very im- perfectly attained. It bears little comparison with the nicety of 1 Art. on The Perception of Space by Disparate Senses, in Mind, October, 1886, pp. 539-554. 'Ibid., p. 549. MIND AS PSYCHICAL SUBJECT. 467 the spatial perceptions belonging to each one of the two senses concerned when interpreting its own specific data in corresponding terms, as it were. 38. In closing this subject, the one psychological truth of pre- eminent value which has been most obviously demonstrated should be stated again. Perception is the result of an extremely complex activity of the psychical subject, Mind ; it involves the synthesis of a number of sense-data according to laws that are not deducible from the nature of the external objects, or of the physiological ac- tion of the end-organs and central organs of sense. An analysis of these data themselves is not sufficient to explain perception. The descriptions of Physiological Psychology can do no more than enumerate these data, show their dependence on external stimuli, and the value which they have as motifs for the perceiving subject ; and then understand the laws of this synthesis as the permanent modes of the behavior of the psychical subject. The object of sense-perception, the presentation of sense, is not an eatfra-mental entity made up outside of the mind and borne into or impressed upon it through the avenues of sense. It is a mental construction. The field of vision is a subjective aftair, and so is the field of touch. The same psychical subject which reacts upon the stimulation of the nervous organs of sense in the form of sensations, by its activity in synthesizing these sensations, constructs the objects of sense. The fundamental fact is the presence and activity of the subject, known as Mind. CHAPTEK VIII. TIME-RELATIONS OF MENTAL PHENOMENA. 1. " PRESENTATIONS of sense " appear in consciousness, not only as having spatial qualities and relations, but also as occurring either simultaneously or successively as respects Time-form. The clear- est experience of the manner in which our sensations are located in this framework of time, as it were, is gained by attention to the successive notes of a melody, or to the rhythm of visual or mus- cular impressions which accompanies a regularly recurrent motion of some member of the body. What is true of the presentations of sense is also true of all mental phenomena, of the reproduced images of sense, of pure creations of fancy, and of thoughts. All have that form of occurrence and relation which we call " Time." Physiological Psychology, however, can no more give an ultimate explanation of this time-form which belongs to all mental phenom- ena than of the space-form which objects of sense acquire as the result of a mental synthesis. Experimental science cannot explain "time." Nothing is accomplished toward comprehending the ori- gin of the mental representation of time by indicating the speed, number, and order of the various series of conscious experiences. Successive presentations of sense or successive ideas do not of themselves constitute a mental presentation or idea of succession. The idea that a follows or precedes b is not the idea of a nor the idea of b ; neither is it the idea of a + b or of a b. Experimental science can explain the order of succession ; but in doing this it implies the idea of succession, and this idea is not itself a succes- sion, or an order of succession, or a compound of successive ideas. 1 Many thousands of experiments have been made (since the work of Bonders in 1868), with the use of the most complicated and deli- cate machinery, in order to fix the amount of time required for the various processes, both nervous and mental, which are the condi- tions of our conscidus life. These experiments have succeeded in bringing many interesting facts to light. But the laws thus estab- lished beyond all reasonable question are remarkably few ; more- 1 Comp. Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologic, II., p. 11 . METHODS OF MEASUREMENT. 469 over, they are nearly all merely restatements in more definite form of familiar generalizations. That a kind of sluggishness or inertia, which the stimulus must overcome, belongs to all the senses, and that they often continue to act, when once roused, after the excit- ing cause is withdrawn ; that different sensations following each other too quickly tend to confuse or destroy each other ; that no one can see or think more than about so rapidly, but that this rate varies with different individuals and with the same individual at different times ; that it takes more time to perceive or think where the objects are complex, and are either too small or too large or too closely alike ; that it takes time to will or choose, less time to act when we know what to expect, and more time to move, in re- sponse to a particular sensation, some part of the body which we are not accustomed to connect with that sensation ; that practice increases the speed of our mental and bodily action, and that fatigue and certain drugs diminish it all these statements are matters of common observation. 2. It is not necessary to describe the construction of the machines which have been used in experimenting upon the time- relations of mental phenomena, or the methods of using them em- ployed and commended by different observers. The general prob- lem is in all cases essentially the same namely, to produce certain definite impressions upon the organs of sense, to secure a definite result in the form of motion of some part of the body as a sign that the impressions have been received (and, perhaps, interpreted and mentally combined), and to measure with extreme accuracy the interval between peripheral stimulation and resulting motion. The electrical current is ordinarily used to mark both the in- stant when the external sense-stimulus acts on the organ and that when the resulting motion occurs. The stimulus may consist in the flash or crackle of an electric spark, the appearance of one or more colors or figures, or letters or words, the sounding of a bell or a falling ball, etc. ; the motion may be with the finger pressing a key, or the foot or hand closing or breaking a circuit, or the vocal organs calling into a tube, etc. The one difficult matter which marks the success or the comparative failure of any series of observations is the arrangement of the experiments and their tabulated results so as to analyze the different elements of the complex process involved. Such experiments need to be repeated many times upon the same individual, so as to eliminate the vari- able factors of bodily condition, attention or distraction of mind, practice, etc. ; they need also to be repeated with many individuals, so as to calculate upon the so-called personal equation. 470 THE FIXING OF KEACTION-TIME. 3. The interval between the instant when the external stimulus begins to act upon the end-organ of sense and the resulting move- ment of some member of the body has been called " physiological time" by Hirsch and others, and " reaction-time " by Exner. The latter term is preferable. Keaction-time is " simple " when all the elements which tend to complicate the processes involved in the re- action, and so to lengthen the time required by it, have been as far as possible eliminated. Reaction obtained in response to a single sensation of known quality, the instant of whose appearance is ex- pected, by executing a single natural and easy motion, best fulfils the conditions of simplicity. It is therefore requisite, for all ex- periments of this sort, that the average simple reaction-time of each individual experimented upon shall be determined ; and also the effect of practice, exhaustion, and other influences upon this inter- val. But even the simplest reaction-time is, of course, a very com- plex affair. Donders 1 distinguished no less than twelve different processes as entering into "physiological time" (or simple reaction-time) and this without interpolating any purely psychical elements, as occupying separate periods, into the entire interval. The analysis of Exner a is more pertinent to our purpose. Exner finds seven elements in all reaction -time : (1) An action of the stimulus on the end-organ of sense preparatory to excitation of the sensory nerve ; (2) centripetal conduction in this nerve ; (3) centripetal conduction in the spinal cord or lower parts of the brain ; (4) transformation of the sensory into the motor impulse ; (5) centrifugal conduction of the impulse in the spinal cord ; (6) centrifugal conduction in the motor nerve ; (7) setting-free of the muscular motion. Of these seven factors, however, the fourth is most interesting to psy- chology. It may properly be called " psycho-physical " as distin- guished from more purely physiological time. The other six ele- ments (with the exception of the first, on account of difficulties inherent in the experiments) have been determined with some de- gree of definiteness (see Part I., chap, iii., on the speed of nervous processes). It is, then, theoretically possible to ascertain the amount of these six and subtract them from the entire reaction-time ; the remainder would be the interval occupied by the central cerebral processes (that is, by No. 4). Thus Exner 3 assumes G2 meters per second as the probable rate of conduction in both sensory and motor nerves ; and in the spinal cord, 8 for the sensory and 1 Archiv f. Anat, Physiol., etc., 1868, p. 664. 2 See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 271. ' 3 Ibid., p. 2721 ELEMENTS OF PSYCHO-PHYSICAL TIME. 471 11-12 for the motor process. He thus calculates that about 0.0828 sec. is" the "reduced reaction-time," or interval occupied within the cerebral centres in transforming the sensory into motor im- pulsesin the special case of reaction from hand to hand, where the whole reaction-time is 0.1337 sec. The uncertainties of all such calculation, however, occasion the demand for other methods of determining the strictly " psycho-physical " portion of reaction- time. 4. " Psycho-physical time " (No. 4 of Exner's seven processes) is analyzed by Wundt ' into three psycho-physical processes : (1) Entrance into the visual field of consciousness, or simple perception ; (2) entrance into the point of clear vision with attention, or apper- ception (attentive and discerning perception) ; (3) the excitation of the will, which sets free in the central organ the registrating mo- tion. Obviously, the mental processes are here all conceived of after the analogy of sight. Consciousness is regarded as a field of vision ; objects enter it and are at first only obscurely and indefi- nitely perceived, as are those visual objects whose images enter the field of the eye at the sides of the retina. Time is required for the objects to arrive at the spot of clear vision the fovea centrahs of consciousness (Blickpunkt) where discerning attention is bestowed upon them and they are apperceived. When they are apperceived, further time is required to get up the corresponding molecular mo- tion in the motor areas of the brain. All three foregoing processes are psycho-physical that is, they comprise physiological processes in the central organs and simultaneous corresponding changes of consciousness occurring in time-form. There is no good reason to suppose that the mind occupies time for its own processes which is separate from and as it were thrown in between the physio- logical processes. Indeed, all the evidence is contrary to such an hypothesis. Wundt has made an elaborate defence of his positions with re- gard to the nature of psycho-physical time. He and his pupils have attempted more definitely to characterize the cerebral changes which correspond to each of the mental elements of (1) perception, (2) apperception, and (3) will. His figure of speech, which likens all changes of conscious states to those produced by moving an image over the retina to the spot of clear vision, may be accepted as helpful to the imagination ; it must not be forgotten, however, that it is still a figure of speech. The fact of which it takes account is, that all changes of consciousness require time in order to define themselves with their maximum of clearness and intensity. The 1 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii.. pp. 220 ff. 472 THE FIXING OF KEACTION-TIME. position that the mental forms of perception, apperception, and will, are exactly simultaneous with corresponding cerebral processes, and that mental states are not to be regarded as forming them- selves in a separate time, as it were, on top of these processes, may also be admitted in a provisional way. It is probable theory, how- ever, rather than demonstrated fact. Accordingly, the first problem of psychometry is, to determine the simple reaction-time, and from it to find the three factors of psycho-physical time namely, per- ception-time, apperception-time (or discernment-time), and will- time. 5. Any psycho-physical theory of the time-relations of mental phenomena requires that account should be taken of the inertia of the nervous system. As composed of moving molecules, it ne- cessarily requires some time to be started by the action of a given stimulus, then reach its maximum of activity in a particular direc- tion, then subside into a negative condition with respect to this direction (called " Anklingen " and " Abklingen " of the nervous excitement, by the German investigators). This statement follows as a necessary assumption from the physical nature of the nerve- fibres and nerve-cells, since inertia is a property of every material mechanism. It is difficult, however, to justify the assumption experimentally, or to fix the exact amount of time consumed by the inertia of different parts of the nervous system. Experiment demonstrates no stadium of latent excitation for the motor nerve, such as is about T ^j- sec. for the muscle when electricity is used. The case is different, however, with the end-organs of sense. They do exhibit a certain sluggishness, and this is one reason why only so many sensations in a given unit of time can be produced by their successive irritation. The result of the inertia of the end-organs, as determining the number of separate excitations of which they are capable in a second, varies for the different senses. The nerve-endings of touch probably exceed all others in the promptness with which they re- spond to stimulus and then return to a relative equilibrium. But the number of separate sensations of this sense which can be pro- duced during a given interval depends in a remarkable way upon the quality and intensity of the stimulus, the place where it is ap- plied, etc. The results of different experimenters therefore differ widely. Preyer thought that 27.6-36.8 nervous shocks (per sec- ond) of the skin fused into one continuous sensation ; but Valentin put the limit at 480-640, and von Wittich ' succeeded in distinguish- 1 For his remarks onPreyer's experiments, see the article in Pfliiger's Archiv, ii., pp. 329 ff. STATEMENT OF TALBOT'S PKINCIPLE. 473 ing about 1,000 separate excitations in this unit of time. Hearing can receive nearly as many separate sensations in a second as can touch. The noise of the electric spark has been heard with one ear only, as separate sensations, at intervals of 0.00205 sec.; but hardly or not at all at intervals of 0.00198 sec. The number of possible sensations of sound may then be placed at about 500 per second. Mach, ' however, by using the click from a revolving toothed- wheel, claims to have reduced the interval to 0.016 sec. The interval is increased to about 0.064 sec. when the same auditory impres- sions are heard by both ears. E. H. Weber noticed that we can tell whether two watches are ticking exactly together much better when both are held near the same ear than when one is held at each ear. Far fewer musical tones than noises can be heard in a second ; and, indeed, a number of vibrations, occupying a consider- able fraction of a second, must be secured before the sensation of tone is established, as it were. The smallest interval for sensations of sight, when the two stimuli act on the same place of the retina, is still greater. In ordinary daylight, rotating disks whose surface is part white and part black become gray (that is, the sensations fuse) when they attain a motion of about 24 per second. It can be told which of two images of elec- tric sparks that are 0.011 mm. apart on the retina occurs first, if the difference in the time of their occurrence is 0.044 sec. If the two sparks are seen as one with an apparent motion, its direction can be distinguished when the two ends of the line of motion are only 0.014-0.015 sec. apart. But if one stimulus strikes thefovea centralis and the other a point of the retina 6 mm. off, the smallest interval for distinct perception is increased to 0.076 sec. 2 Within certain limits these intervals are independent of the intensity of the light, when it falls on the retina near its centre ; but (comp. p. 334) the intensity and quality of the sensations are connected with the time during which the stimulus acts. The law for the "time- course " of such retinal excitations has been stated and defended by Fick, 3 as known by the name of " Talbot's principle :" If any place of the retina is periodically excited with light of given intensity, for a certain time a, and then left unexcited for a time b, and if the time a + b is less than about 0.04 sec., then the sensation becomes continuous, with a strength corresponding to the excitation , 1 Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., LI., p. 142. 2 Comp. Exner, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 256 f.; and Sitzgsber. d. Wiener Acad., LXXIL, p. 156 f. 3 Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., 1863, p. 739 f.; and Hermann's Handb. d. Phy- siol., III., i, p. 2121 474 THE FIXING OF KEACTION-TIME. If the inertia of the eye for the different color-sensations were greatly different, we would see objects differently colored accord- ing to the time that the rays from them were acting on the retina. That the different parts of the spectrum do actually require slightly different intervals of time to reach the maximum of their excitation has been shown by Kunkel. l Equally bright light, as before stated (p. 334), attains its maximum effect, for red rays in about 0.0573 sec., for green in 0.133 sec., for blue in 0.091G sec. With the same color-tone, the greater the brightness the quicker the maximum effect is reached. Thus for three degrees of brightness the time for red rays is 0.0573-0.071 sec. ; for green, 0.0699-0.133 sec. ; for blue, 0.0916-0.102 sec. Accordingly, the spectrum may be reduced in size and number of color-tones by diminishing the duration of the action of the light which forms it. The measurement of the smallest interval for sensations of smell and taste cannot be made with satisfactory exactness on account of the nature of the stimuli of these senses. Little is known which goes beyond ordinary experience concerning after-tastes analogous to the after-images of the eye. One experimenter (Bidder) thought that the sensation continued after the tongue had been so carefully dried off that no particles of the tastable substance were left remain- ing ; but of this we can scarcely be sure. It may be that certain substances leave their after-taste because their tastable particles are dissolved later ; or because their effect, being weaker, is at first suppressed by particles of stronger quality. 2 6. When the successive sensations are of different senses, the " smallest interval " between them, and so the number possible in a second, varies still more. The following table 3 exhibits the re- sults obtained by several different observers : Sec. Between two sensations of sound (electrical sparks) 0.002 Between two sensations of light (direct electrical excitation of same retinal spot) 0.017 Between two sensations of touch (impact on finger Mach) 0.0277 Between two sensations of light (ztfovea centrcdis, by optical images). . 0.044 Between two sensations of light (at periphery of retina, by optical images) 0. 049 Between sensation of sight and sensation of touch (sight following). . . . 0.05 Between sensation of sight and sensation of hearing (sight following). . 0.06 Between two sensations of noises (each heard by one ear) 0.064 Between sensation of sight and sensation of touch (sight preceding) . . . 0.071 Between two sensations of light, one at the periphery and the other at the centre of retina 0.076 Between sensation of sight and sensation of hearing (sight preceding). . . 0.16 1 Pfluger's Archiv, ix. , p. 206 f. 2 Comp. von Vintschgau, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 221. 3 By Exner, in Hermann's Haiidb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 262. REACTION FKOM HAND TO HAND. 475 7. The way that the intensity of sensations of light rises to a maximum, continues there, and then falls off through exhaustion of the retina, in time, has been represented by Fick ' with the use of the accompanying figure (No. 114). 8. The point of starting for determining experimentally all the problems which concern the durations and relations in time . of mental phenomena is gained * . FIG. 114. Curves showing the Rise and Fall of by fixing' the " Simple reaction- the Intensity of Sensations of Light the ab- it mi / -ii f cissas measured along a-d representing the time. This is found to vary for time, different persons, for the differ- ent senses, and under different conditions of expectation, attention, habit, etc. In its very simplest form, the question may be stated as follows : How long an interval will elapse, under the most favorable circumstances, between the instant when some end-organ of sense is stimulated and the instant when motion follows as the result of rec- ognizing the fact, in consciousness, that such stimulation has taken place ? In this form the three elements of psycho-physical time (perception, discernment or apperception, and choice) are sup- posed to be reducible to one namely, to simple perception. This supposition is, of course, true only in case that, by practice in react- ing upon an expected sensation in one definite way, the cerebral sensory-motor processes have attained the highest possible rate of speed, and the time ordinarily occupied in deciding what to do, and in starting the voluntary motor mechanism, has been reduced al- most, or quite, to zero. 2 The entire process then becomes reflex, simply the sensory central part of it being represented by a con- scious act of perception. To shorten the reaction-time as- much as possible, the subject of the experiment must know what place of the sensory organism is to be hit by the stimulus, and about when to look out for it ; he must also be called upon to react, in one and the same easy and natural way, in all cases, as soon as he knows that he is hit at all. The following table 3 gives the mean values of the reaction-time "from hand to hand " (one hand being hit by the electrical current 1 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol. III., i., p. 216. 2 Comp. Wundt, Physiol og. Psychologie, ii., p. 226 f. 3 Taken from Exner, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii,, p. 263; the two sets of numbers indicate values which were found in two series of exper- iments. 476 THE FIXING OF KEACTION-TIME. and the other reacting, for example, to press a key), as determined by various observers : Hi^,, Koh^sc,, En.. 0.13776 sec. I 0.1733 sec. ) n 1RQ7 ) 0.153 sec. [ 0.1276 sec. ) 0. 1087 sec. I 0.117 sec. 0.12495 sec. j 0.1911 sec. J U ' 1D IC< f 0.166 sec. } 0.1283 sec. ( 0.1860 sec. J 0.146 sec. The last two experimenters developed certain interesting results. They found the reaction-time, when the stimulus was applied to the middle finger, to be for Kries 0.117 sec. and for Auerbach 0.146 sec. ; but when applied to the back of the hand, to be for Kries 0.119 sec. and for Auerbach 0.147 sec. But the hand being about 16 ctm. nearer the brain than the middle finger, its reaction-time should have been some 0.004 sec. shorter instead of longer, as a matter of physiological time. Exner found that the reaction-time, when the forehead is stimulated, is greater than when the stimulus is applied to the hand. Bloch found the same thing true when the nose is stimulated. The intercerebral relations, taken in connection with the law of habit, probably account for the foregoing facts. The value of the reaction-time also changes when the character of the stimulus is changed on which the subject of experiment re- acts. This fact is made apparent by the following table : l Observer. Optical stimulus. Acoustic stimulus. Stimulus of touch. Sec. Sec. Sec. Hirsch ............... 0.200 0. 149 0.182 (hand). Hankel ............... 0.225 0.151 0.155 Bonders ............... 0.188 0.180 0.154 (neck). Von Wittich .......... 0.194 0.182 0.130 (forehead). Wundt ................ 0.175 0.128 0.188 Exner ................ 0.1506 0.1360 0.1276 (hand). Auerbach ............. 0.191 0.122 0.146 VonKries ............. 0.193 0.120 0.117 We conclude, then, that under the most favorable circumstances the reaction-time can scarcely be reduced to T 1 of a second, while it rarely rises much above -f$ of a second. 9. It has been argued that the apparent difference in the reac- tion-times of different senses is due to difference in the intensity of the stimuli applied. Increasing the strength of the stimulus de- creases the reaction-time in all the senses ; but we have no veiy good means of measuring stimuli of one sense in terms of another sense. It has been proposed 2 to reduce them to a common standard by referring the sensations to the point where they barely reach the " threshold of excitation " (JReizschwelle) ; that is, where they 1 Taken from the article of von Kries and Auerbach, Archiv f. Anat. u. Phy- siol., Physiolog. Abth., 1877, p. 359 f. 8 By Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 223 f. EFFECT OF INCKEASED INTENSITY. 477 are just perceptible in consciousness. In this way the mean result for sound (0.337), light (0.331), and touch (0.327) are found to be almost exactly the same. It has further been argued that the speed of perception and the duration of psycho-physical time are the same for all the senses. On the contrary, there seems good reason to suppose that the reaction-time of sight is necessarily longer than that of hearing or touch, on account of the photo- chemical nature of its more immediate stimulus. One observer (von Wittich) has even gone so far as to conjecture that the speed of conduction in the optic nerve is less than that of the other nerves of sense ; it is rather to be concluded, however, that the la- tent time of the sensory end-apparatus, and of the cerebral pro- cesses by which sensory impulses pass over into motor impulses, 1 is different. 10, The effect of increasing the intensity of the stimulus, in di- minishing the reaction-time, has been studied by Wundt for sen- sations of sound occasioned by the fall of a hammer or ball with the following result : Height of hammer. Eeaction-time. Sec. 1 millimeter 0.217 4 millimeters 0.146 8 millimeters 0.133 16 millimeters . . 0.135 Height of ball. Eeaction-time. Sec. 2 centimeters 0.161 5 centimeters 0.176 25 centimeters 0.159 55 centimeters . . . 0.094 This effect is obtained, of course, only within certain limits ; for the sound must not be so loud as to startle and confuse. Thus, also, when the length of the electric spark which stimulates the retina is increased the reaction-time is diminished. Exner 2 found that, while it was 0.1581-0.1502 sec. for sparks 0.5-1 mm. in length, it was 0.1479-0.1384 sec. for those 2-5 mm. long, and diminished to 0.1229 sec. for those of 7 mm. The reaction-time is also diminished by indicating the instant at about which the sensation may be expected, through some pre- ceding signal. The interval for the sound caused by a ball falling 25 ctm., which without signal was 0.253 sec., was reduced by a signal to 0.076 sec. ; and when the fall was 5 ctm. the interval was reduced by the signal from 0.266-0.175 sec. 3 In order to secure this effect, however, the interval between signal and impression should be nearly constant, and not so long as to overstrain atten- 1 Comp. von Kries and Auerbach, Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1877, p. 359 f. 8 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 2691 3 See Wundt, Physiolog. Physiol., ii., p. 238. 478 THE FIXING OF REACTION-TIME. tion or prevent the carrying of a definite mental image of this in- terval. The detailed investigations of Berger, 1 recently published, an- nounce the following conclusions : (1) The reaction-time increases in inverse ratio to the intensity of the stimulus, and so much the faster the nearer we approach the " threshold " (or lower limit) of the stimulus ; (2) discernment-time is related to alterations in the intensity of the stimulus in the same way as simple reaction-time ; and (3) will-time is independent of the intensity of the stimulus. 11. When the quality of the impression to be expected is known, but its intensity is unknown, the reaction-time is increased. The increase is greater if the alternation of intensities is very irreg- ular. This fact is exhibited by the following table : 3 I. Uniform change of intensity. Sec. Loud sound 0.116 Feeble sound.. . 0.127 II. Irregular change of intensity. Sec. Loud sound 0.189 Feeble sound.., . 0.298 By suddenly intercalating a feeble sound in a series of loud noises the reaction-time may be prolonged to 0.4 or 0.5 sec. It is also greatly lengthened when the impression is wholly unexpected by the subject of the experiment being taken off guard, as it were ; in such a case, also, it may reach 0.5 sec. As might be expected, it takes longer to react in an unnatural and unaccustomed way. It requires more time to react with the foot than with the hand ; a mean reaction-time from eye to foot was found by Exner to be 0.1840 sec. 12. The reaction-time for the sense of taste varies in depend- ence upon the part of the tongue to which the stimulus is applied, and upon the character of the gustable substance. It also varies greatly with different persons. Von Wittich fixed it at 0.167 sec. from tongue to hand, by using the sour taste which the electrical current excites. The reaction-time for sugar on the tip of the tongue varied, for three different persons, from 0.1639 to 0.3502 sec. ; and for quinine, for two persons, from 0.2196 to 0.993 sec. For the root of the tongue, it was found to be 0.552 sec. for sugar, and 0.502 sec. for quinine. 3 Little has been done to determine the reaction-time of smell. Some have maintained that it must be much longer than the reaction-time of sight and hearing, and even reach several seconds ; others have held that, although slower than these 1 Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, 1885, III., heft i., pp. 38 ff. 2 Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 241 f. 3 Von Vintschgau and Honigschmied, in Pfluger's Archiv, x., 1; xii., 2; riv., 3. THE METHOD OF BONDERS. 479 senses, smell has probably a reaction-time of only a fraction of a second. The latter view seems more recently to have been con- firmed by the experiments of Moldenhauer, 1 who obtained the fol- lowing among other figures : Oil of mentha, 0.203-0.362 sec. ; oil of bergamot, 0.212-0.374 sec. ; camphor, 0.226-0.492 sec. ; musk, 0.319 sec. Taste and smell are much more subject to change in the length of the reaction-time through individual peculiarities of the exciting substances and of the subjects of experiment, than are the senses of hearing, sight, and touch. 13. Having obtained the mean reaction-time for the different senses under varying circumstances, the method of investigation requires that it should be determined how much the reaction-time is increased by increasing and complicating the psycho-physical elements. One principal question to be answered by this method is the following : How much time is required for " apperception" or clear discernment of perceived objects in the central point of con- sciousness under different conditions ? This question has been very patiently and fully investigated, at first by Ponders, and since by many observers, especially by von Kries and Auerbach. 3 Donders 9 and his pupils were the first to examine in detail the speed of psychical processes, with a view to determine how long it takes to recognize one of two or more different presentations of sense ; and also how long to solve the dilemma of choosing one of two means for making the reaction. For example, in one series of experiments the eye was suddenly stimulated with either red or white light (the subject of the experiment not knowing which to expect), the signal for the former to be given with the right hand, the signal for the latter with the left. In another series of experi- ments, the quality of the light or sound was to be recognized before reaction, but reaction was to take place only in case a particular one of the two sensations was recognized ; in case the other sensa- tion appeared in consciousness, no reaction was to take place. In other words, discernment of the presentation of sense was to be followed by the choice between reacting in a prescribed way and re- fraining from reacting at all. In still other experiments the stimulus consisted of a "vocal clang "called into a "phonautograph" by one person, and the reaction consisted of the same clang repeated by another person ; or, again, the recognition of one or more letters seen was signalled by a movement of the hand. By such methods 1 Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, I, heft iv., p. 606 f. 2 See their article in Archiv 1 Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1877, pp. 297-378. 3 Archiv f. Anat, Physiol., etc., 1868, pp. 657-675. 480 APPERCEPTION AND WILL TIME. Donders made the mean reaction-time of five persons, for dis- cernment between red and white light, with choice of the hand by which to react, to be 0.154 sec.; the minimum, 0.122 sec.; the maximum, 0.184. The mean reaction-time for two letters, with discernment and signal by calling them out, was found to be 0.166 sec.; when the number of letters was increased to five, the mean reaction-time rose to 0.170. It took 0.180 sec. to discern and repeat a vocal clang when known, 0.268 sec. when unknown. With the method of reacting only on one clang and keeping silent when others were heard, the mean reaction-time varied from 0.201 to 0.284 sec. The investigations of Donders made obvious the fact already stated (p. 475 f.), that the natural connection between the sensation and the peculiar means chosen for reaction is of in- fluence in determining the interval. Donders assigned 0.039 sec. to the psychical process of the development of a presentation of sound in his own case, and a little less to the formation of a decision of will. 14. Another and ingenious method of determining the time required for " apperception " was proposed by Baxt ;' it was based upon the principle of the inertia of the senses, especially of sight. Suppose the question raised, How long must an image act on the optical apparatus in order to occasion a clear presentation of sense ? It may be answered by discovering how quickly after a given im- pression another stronger one must follow in order that the latter may overtake the former, and quench it as it were before it reaches the focus of apperception. Let then some image which requires discernment to interpret it as the image of several letters, or of a simple geometrical figure be thrown upon the retina, and let this image be succeeded after a brief interval by the image of a bright white disk ; then, if the interval be less than a certain time, apperception (or clear vision, with discernment of the significance of the image) will not take place at all. Baxt found that the time ne- cessary under these circumstances for a presentation of visual sense depends upon the intensity of the second excitation ; it increases as this intensity increases. It depends also upon the complexity of the apperception required ; to recognize three letters required only about half the time necessary to recognize five or six. With an interval of 0.0048 sec. between the two excitations, the first ap- peared as scarcely a trace of a weak shimmer ; with an interval of 0.0096 sec., letters appeared in the shimmer one or two of which could be partially recognized when the interval increased to 0.0144 sec. When the interval was made 0.0192 sec., the objects were a 1 See Pfluger's Archiv, iv., pp. 325 ff. CONCLUSIONS OF KEIES AND AUERBACH. 481 little more clearly discerned ; at 0.0336 sec. four letters could be well recognized ; at 0.0432 sec., five letters ; and at 0.0528 sec. all the letters could be read. 15. The method of Baxt was rejected by von Kries and Auer- bach 1 as unsuitable to answer the question most interesting to psycho-physical researches ; because it includes as an inextricable factor the time used up in the peripheral nerves. Besides, we have no means of estimating just to what stadium a psycho-physi- cal process must have advanced when it becomes impossible for a strong succeeding sensation to overwhelm it. These observers pre- ferred, therefore, the method employed by Donders, and especially in the form (called " Bonders' C-method ") in which the subject of ex- periment reacts in one prescribed way or else refrains from reacting at all. By this method they endeavored to answer the questions : " How long time passes after the occurrence of a stimulus of sight before I know what color it has ; and how long before I know at what place in the field of sight I experience it," etc. ? Their results may be summed up in the following table. a [The numbers give the time assigned by them to the discernment involved in the va- rious processes performed that is,, the psycho-physical time exclu- sive of all solution of a dilemma by the will. This time is found by subtracting the simple reaction-time, or time necessary for re- acting when no discernment is required, from the whole time re- quired for the process including such discernment.] Auerbach. Von Kries. Discernment of the direction of light Sec. Oil Sec. 017 Discernment between two colors ... 012 034 015 032 Discernment of tone when higher 019 049 0.021 036 Localization of distance by sight 022 030 Discernment between tone and noise . ... 022 046 Judgment of intensity of sensations of touch (strong). . . . Discernment of tone when lower 0.023 034 0.061 054 Judgment of intensity of sensations of touch (weak) Localization of sound (maximum) 0.053 0.062 0.105 0.077 16. Various interesting discoveries were made during the course of the experiments which resulted in preparing the foregoing table. For example, it was found that the simple reaction-time for A. (Auerbach), when stimulus was applied to the middle finger or 1 See Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1877, Physiolog. Abth., p. 298. 2 Ibid., p. 346 f. 31 482 APPERCEPTION AND WILL TIME. back of the hand, was 0.146-0.147 sec.; and for K. (Kries), 0.117-0.119 sec. But, as the table shows, when discernment was required of the two observers, the reaction-time of K. was relative- ly so much increased as to make his discernment-time greater than that of A. The result of practice in discernment was found to hold good for other areas of the skin than those in experimenting upon which the practice was gained. For discernment among three places (middle finger, back of hand, and middle of lower arm), the order being unknown and only one to be reacted on the mean in- terval required was for A. 0.028 sec., and for K. 0.050 sec. ; fur- ther practice, however, reduced this interval to about the same as that required for two places. Discernment between two intensities of the sensation of touch was found to be very uncertain and difficult. Many more false reactions followed the attempt to tell whether the dorsal side of the last of the phalanges of the middle finger was being hit with the weaker or the stronger of two stimuli than occurred in the attempts to localize tactile sensations. The discernment-time, when reaction followed the stronger stimulus, was 0.016-0.034 sec. for A, and 0.05-0.07 for K. ; when reaction followed the weaker stimulus, the discernment-time was 0.035-0.069 sec. for A, and 0.089-0. 114 forK. The character of our judgments of intensity is, perhaps, dependent on the steepness, as it were, with which the curve rises in consci- ousness ; but, however this may be, it appears that we discern how and where we are affected with a sensation more promptly than about how much we are affected. When discernment between two simple tones of different pitch is required, the reaction follows the one of higher pitch more promptly. Thus the discernment-time, under such circumstances, was for A, 0.015-0.044 sec., and for K, 0.043-0.11 ; but, if reaction followed the tone of lower pitch, the discernment- time for A. was 0.03-0.059 sec., and for K. 0.045-0.092. To discern tone from noise, when re- action followed the tone, A. required 0.015-0.023 sec., and K. 0.036 -0.055 ; when reaction followed the noise, A's discernment- time was 0.017-0.025 sec, and K's, 0.045-0.047. The reaction-time dimin- ishes as the pitch rises ; for very high notes it nearly reaches the limit required for hearing the noise of the electric spark. The ex- planation for these experiences requires reference again to the fact that some 15-20 vibrations are necessary to start the organ so that the sensation of musical tone can be received at all. ' The simple reaction-time for sensations of sound remains nearly the same for all changes in the angle by which the locality of the sound diverges from the median plane between the two ears. But THE EXPERIMENTS OF WUNDT. 483 the time required for discerning the locality of the sound varies greatly for the different sizes of this angle. Thus the discernment- time for locality, as to right or left, varied for Auerbach and Kries as follows : Angle 120-35. Angle 35-2G. Angle 26 -11. A . . Sec. 0.020 Sec. 0.033 Sec. 0.120 K 0.013 0.122 0.153 The discernment-time required for localizing the direction of a spark by direct vision varied for A. from 0.005 to 0.025 sec., and for K. from 0.006 to 0.029 sec. ; by indirect vision, for A. from 0.008 to 0.028 sec., and for K. from 0.007 to 0.028 sec. For localizing distance, A. required 0.019 to 0.027 sec. of discernment-time, when the object arose in front of the fixation-point, and K. 0.027 to 0.035 sec. ; but A. required 0.019 to 0.029 sec., and K. 0.021 to 0.036 sec., when the object arose behind this point. 17. Various strong objections have been raised to the validity of the results reached by the observers last mentioned. For ex- ample, Eichet 1 thinks that an interval so small as their " discern- ment-time" (about 0.03 sec.) is below the limit of the experimental error. But the constancy of the results obtained by such a large number of experiments with reference to the mental peculiarities of the two subjects of experiment, and to the different kinds of men- tal processes involved (discernment of locality, quality, quantity, etc.), is too great to allow of the results being summarily rejected. The criticism of Wundt 2 as applied to the method employed (the so-called "Bonders' C-method") is much more pertinent. This veteran experimenter considers that the psycho-physical time re- quired to discriminate between two or more possible presentations of sense, and then react only in case one of them is apperceived, cannot all be allotted to discernment-time. For an element of vo- lition, or will-time, is as truly involved in the decision whether to react or not to react as in the decision between two modes of reaction. With a view, then, to analyze these elements more perfectly, and so determine the exact duration of "apperception," in the sense in which the word is used by Wundt, another method of experiment has been employed by Friedrich. 3 In this method the subject of experiment is warned when to expect one of two or more colors 1 See Revue philosophique, VI. , p. 395. 2 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii. , p. 251 f . 3 See Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, II., heft i., pp. 39 ff. 484 APPERCEPTION AND WILL TIME. to be discerned, but does not know which one to expect ; only one way of reaction is employed for all cases ; and the judgment of the subject is left to determine just when he clearly discerns, or " apper- ceives," the object.. The time of apperception is then found by sub- tracting the simple reaction-time (or time necessary to announce the sensation without discernment) from the entire reaction-time thus obtained. In this way the interval for apperception was fixed at 0.030 to 0.185 sec. for white, in the case of Wundt, and 0.044 to 0.146 for black ; in the case of Tischer, 0.046 to 0.112 sec. for white, and 0.021 to 0.061 for black ; and in the case of Friedrich himself, 0.042 to 0.084 sec. for white, and 0.019 to 0.064 for black. The mean duration of apperception, as derived from all the experiments with two color-sensations, was 0.086 sec. for W., 0.047 for T., 0.050 for F. 18. The time required for discernment increases, of course, when the other conditions are kept as nearly as possible the same, but the number of objects is increased among which the discern- ment is required. For example, Friedrich found that when four (instead of two) colors black, white, green, and red were inter- changed in an unknown order, both the reaction-time as a whole and the duration of apperception were increased. The latter for black as one of four colors was, when averaged for several series of experiments, 0.081 to 0.141 in Wundt's case, 0.021 to 0.105 in Tisch- er's, 0.076 to 0.197 in his own. With red as one of four colors the duration of apperception was 0.049 to 0.247 for W., 0.024 to 0.124 for T., and 0.066 to 0.234 for F. Experiments were also instituted with a view to determine how long it takes to discern composite percep- tions of sight. 1 For this purpose printed figures of 6 mm. high and 3.8 mm. broad were employed, ranging from one to six places the reaction being in the form of calling the number constituted by the figures as arranged when displayed. The mean time required for apperception by the three subjects of experiment is shown by the following table : [The figures at the head of the columns indi- cate the number of places which the numbers had in the different series of experiments ; the letters, the subjects of experiment ; the figures under the head, the seconds of apperception-time.] l. 2. 8. 4. 5. 6. W.. Sec. 0.344 Sec. 0.361 Sec. 0.354 Sec. 0.459 Sec. 0.573 Sec. 0.817 T 0.290 0380 0493 709 0849 1 197 F 0320 0346 0344 0.481 0670 1.043 Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, I., heft i., p. 53 f. THE HEADING OF NUMBERS. 485 It will be noticed that the reaction- time for numbers of three places is not much greater than that for numbers of one place ; but when the complexity is increased to four places, the reaction-time is suddenly and largely increased. This fact is probably due in part to the habit of grasping numbers mentally in periods of three places each. It is not certain, however, that the apperception-time as calculated by this method is trustworthy ; for, although the sub- ject of experiment reacts, and then notifies the number discerned, the act of discernment may really be completed after the reaction has taken place. Moreover, a certain time for accommodating the eye must be allowed ; especially in the case of numbers of five or six figures each. This time, in the opinion of one critic, may be placed at 0.166 to 0.186 sec. A more recent investigator 1 concludes that the true discernment-time in a composite perception is possibly so short as to occupy only a few hundredths of a second. For numbers of one to three places the interval between perception and apperception is 0.015 to 0.035 sec. This conclusion accords with and enforces that arrived at by the careful experiments of von Kries and Auerbach. Cattell 2 by assuming that perception-time and wdll-time are about equal, and thus dividing into two parts the remainder ob- tained by subtracting the simple reaction-time from the whole time including both discernment and choice estimated the perception- time for light, of B. at 0.030 sec., and of himself at 0.050. It took longer, of course, to discern between two colors. Between red and blue discernment required about 0.038 sec. for B., and 0.054 for C. If one color among ten was to be discerned, the time rose to 0. 105 for B., and 0.117 for C. The time required to discern one letter from all the others was found to vary somewhat for the different letters ; but the legibility, or comparative accuracy of the quick discernment, varied still more. In this sense the letter W is about four times as " legible " as E. The discernment-time for a simple picture of a familiar object was found to be about the same as that for a color, and shorter than that for a letter or a word. 19. We have already seen (p. 480) that Donders assigned a little less time (0.036 sec.) to the operation of will in setting free the required impulse when a dilemma was presented to it than is required for discernment between two objects of the visual sense. The duration of " will-time" (the third element of psycho-physical time) has since been investigated at greater length by Friedrich, Buccola, Merkel, and others. The first of these experimenters 1 Tigerstedt, in Zeitschrift f. Biologie, 1883, XIX., p. 42 f. 3 See Mind, July, 1886. 486 APPERCEPTION AND WILL TIME. determined the time required for simple choice by finding how much the reaction-time is increased when the subject of experiment must decide whether to react or not. l For example, let the sensa- tions of black and white follow each other in unknown order, it be- ing understood that only white is to be followed by reaction. The interval for simple choice was thus found by Friedrich to have a mean value of 0.152 sec. for W., 0.184 for T., and 0.183 for him- self ; it lay, therefore, between ^ and ^ sec. If choice was re- quired, however, between the two hands reaction with one hand being the sequence of the appearance of one color, and with the other hand of the appearance of the other color the interval assigned to this element of psycho-physical time increased to 0.188 sec. for W., 0.330 for T., and 0.287 for F. 2 Merkel 3 has perhaps investigated most thoroughly the time- relations of activities of the will. The question he proposes for answer is the following : How long does it take, under different circumstances, to set free a voluntary impulse ? He assumes that, in all cases where reaction follows discernment between two or more impressions, some " will-time " is present, although the amount of this time may become so minute as to escape detection. The method of Merkel was suggested by Wundt. The simple reaction-time (R), or time required when the nature of the stimulus is known and the mode of reaction fixed the same for all cases, is first found. The reaction-time required to discern clearly one of two or more impressions, and announce the fact in some one way previously determined upon (R d), is next found. Finally, the re- action-time is found for cases where there is involved, in addition to discernment, a choice between one or more ways of reacting, or between reacting and not reacting (R d w). The difference RdRis then held to give the "discernment-time;" the difference R dwR d is held to give the " will-time." It is with the latter that we are now concerned. For his experiments Merkel used figures of about 13 mm. altitude placed 250 mm. distant from the eye. To deter- mine the reaction-time, including discernment (R d), but not includ- ing choice, reaction is ordered invariably with the same finger. To determine reaction-time, including choice (R d w), reaction is ordered with some one finger of either hand previously assigned to each number. Will- time is then found by subtracting the reaction - time in the former case from that in the latter (R dwR d). The 1 Friedrich, in Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, I., heft i. , p. 57 f. 2 Only a few experiments of this kind were tried ; the numbers are those given by Merkel in his article. 3 Article in Wundt's Philosoph. Studieu, II., heft i., pp. 73-127. DIFFERENCES OF INDIVIDUALS. 487 results showed that while the simple reaction-time for the different fingers of both hands does not differ greatly, the difference in will- time for the different fingers is much more marked. The latter difference is greater among the fingers of the right than of the left hand. For ten persons experimented upon, the mean interval required for setting free a definite reaction, with a choice between two possible courses, varied from 0.024 to 0.155 sec. This inter- val increases for every additional course possible until, in case the subject of the experiment is required to select one of his ten fingers with which to react on receiving an impression corresponding to that finger, the will-time becomes 0.298 to 0.448 sec. Very interesting individual differences in the speed of decision attained under different conditions of complexity are brought out by Merkel's experiments. This fact may be shown by plotting the curve of the will-time of each individual. In general, it was found that the individual differences increased as the complexity of the choice required was increased from one to five places, and that they then fell off, being least at nine or ten places. That is to say, different individuals differ much more markedly in the speed with which they can choose one of two or five than one of nine or ten different pos- sible ways of reaction. Merkel's value for will-time when the choice lies between two courses (E w 0.024 to 0.155 sec.) may profitably be compared with that given by Buccola for choice between motion and rest with discernment of color-tone and locality (0.028 sec. and 0.066 sec. respectively), or with that given by Tischer 1 for choice between motion and rest (for nine persons, 0.052 to 0.179 sec*.) or for choice between two symmetrical motions (0.033 to 0.179 sec.). 20. A careful survey of the statistics and discussions furnished by different experimenters shows that it is not as yet possible to analyze with perfect confidence the different elements of psycho- physical time. Wundt seems justified in holding that will-time is necessarily involved in the choice between motion and rest. But, on the other hand, von Kries and Auerbach appear to have reduced this time almost or quite to zero, by practice and by arranging their experiments under the most favorable conditions. By elimi- nating will-time they have, perhaps, found about what is the least possible interval required for simple acts of discernment. There is other evidence (from the phenomena of rhythm, etc.), however, to indicate that successive acts of discernment may attain a higher rate of speed than is possible for successive acts of will. 21. Investigation has also been directed toward determining how far series of events in consciousness correspond, as regards 1 See Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, I. , heft iv. , p. 533 f. 488 APPERCEPTION AND WILL TIME. time, to the series of excitations which occasion them. Something may thus be accomplished toward fixing the time-rate of conscious- ness, as well as the interval which it is possible for the mind to ap- preciate with the nearest approach to perfect accuracy. In all the preceding experiments the subject of them is uniformly aware that a pause, as it were, takes place between the excitation and the re- action ; this pause he is able to estimate with much accuracy, and so to tell whether his effort to react promptly has been more or less successful. Exner ' states that in 39 cases of reaction from eye to foot, which had a mean of 0.184 sec., the reaction was always felt (with a single exception) to be " too slow " when it reached 0.1994 sec., and pronounced " very good " when it fell below 0.1781 sec.; its time was therefore estimated within about 0.01 sec. There is abundant proof, however, that the speed and duration of our sensa- tions, as estimated in consciousness, do not precisely correspond with the series of stimulations of the organ of sense. Indeed, under certain circumstances very remarkable errors may occur in our estimate of both the rate and the interval of our mental acts. To show the fact and amount of the error which takes place when we are called to intercalate an excitation of any kind in a series of impressions, Wundt 3 devised the following experiment : An indi- cator is kept moving at a uniform rate over a graduated scale, and so situated that the place of the needle can be clearly seen at each instant of time. The action of the same clock which moves the needle causes a sound at any moment, but in such a way that the subject of experiment does not know when to expect it. With what position of the needle, now, will the sensation of sound be combined? Will the sound be heard exactly when it occurs as indicated by the needle ; or later than its real time (" positive " lengthening) ; or earlier than its real time (" negative " lengthen- ing) ? The result shows that one rarely hears the sound without either positive or negative displacement of it ; but most frequently the lengthening is negative that is, one believes one hears the sound before it really occurs as measured by the indicator. 22. Vierordt, 8 after experimenting upon our power to repro- duce the interval as heard between two sensations of noise, con- cluded that very small intervals are regularly overestimated and greater ones underestimated. The minimum of error in estimating intervals the duration that corresponds most perfectly in our con- sciousness to the real duration as measured by objective methods ! Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 273 f. 2 Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 264 f. Der Zeitsinn. Tubingen, 1868. INTERVAL OF MINIMUM ERROR. 489 he placed at 1-1.5 sec. More recently (1881) Kollert ' published the results of experiments instituted with a view to determine the accuracy of our sense of time. Suppose that one metronome is marking off time, by the sound it makes, with a normal interval = t. Another metronome is at the same time at work with an in- terval = 3, that may be made to vary with different experiments, and that is set as either equal to or slightly greater or less than t. Let T the time in our consciousness which is equivalent to t, and A = a constant representing the mean error which is made in es- timating the relations of the two intervals (t and <9) ; that is, A = t $. Let 3 l the intervals of consciousness just observably smaller, and $ 2 = those just observably greater, than the normal time (t). Then the following table shows how A varies as t varies; d l giving the experiments in which the interval of the variable metronome was smaller, and d 2 those in which it was greater, than t (^ - t = d l5 and S s - t = dj. t= dj= d a = A= 0.4 -0.018 +0.090 +0.036 0.5 0.044 0.098 0.026 0.7 0.044 0.055 0.005 0.8 0.073 0.060 -0.006 1.0 0.107 0.063 0.022 1.2 0.206 0.074 0.066 It will be noticed that, according to these results, our sensitive- ness to minute differences of time varies for different intervals so that it is greatest at 0.7-0.8 sec. (A = o at about 0.755 sec.) ; while it falls off quickly for intervals less than this, and more slowly for intervals longer than this. Kollert confirms Vierordt's statement that times above this most favorable time are estimated too small, and those below too large. He also concludes that, as the normal time increases, our sensitiveness to minute differences of diminution is lessened, while our sensitiveness to minute differences of increase grows greater. The same method as that employed by Kollert has been applied by another observer 2 to intervals longer than 0.4-1.5 sec. Using intervals of 1.8-8.0 sec. for the normal time, the sensitiveness of our estimate of minute differences was still found to diminish as the normal time increases ; thus the mean error of all the individ- uals engaged in the experiments (A m) increased from 0.0792- 0.0879 sec. for intervals of 1.8-2.0 sec. to 0.5988 sec. for intervals 1 Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, L, heft i., pp. 78 ff. 2 Estel, in Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, II. , heft i., pp. 37 ff. 490 COMPLEX REACTION TIME. of 8.0 sec. 1 Estel reaches the conclusion that "our ideas of time, like our other sensations and ideas, are essentially conditioned upon past impressions belonging to the same domain of sense ; and a short time makes the one next succeeding appear longer, while a long time shortens still more the succeeding shorter time." A more recent investigator 2 places the interval which can be repro- duced with greatest accuracy at 0.53-0.87 sec. ; but reaches the conclusion that, with all other intervals, an error is made which is plus for those above, and minus for those below, this so-called in- difference-point. This conclusion would seem to need re-examina- tion, since it is exactly the opposite of that of preceding investi- gators. The difference in result may, however, be clue to difference in the method of experiment, which in the one case consisted in noticing the least observable difference in two series of intervals, and in the other consisted in catching, mentally, a given interval, retaining and reproducing it. 23. In this connection should be mentioned the results of in- teresting " studies of rhythm " undertaken by G. Stanley Hall and J. Jastrow. 3 These observers experimented to find the degree of accuracy with which successive clicks having a constant interval can be counted. It was found that persons most successful were able to count 2-4 clicks with perfect accuracy, when the interval be- tween them was 0.0895 sec. ; but if this interval was diminished to 0.0523 sec., they could not be sure of more than two clicks. When the number of clicks was increased to 45, with the longer of these intervals, the most successful estimates were 42 and 43 ; with the shorter interval, for the same actual number, the best estimate was 32 and the worst was 17. The conclusion is thus reached that " count- ing requires a series of innervations, if not of actual muscular contractions," and that " attention discriminates sensation much more rapidly than the will can generate impulses." If, then, the interval between the acoustic sensations is less than the reduced reaction-interval (or time necessary for starting successive impulses of innervation) between ear and tongue, some of the sensations will drop out of consciousness as a result of the blending, as it were, of the later afferent with the earlier efferent stage of the complex process. The time-sense for series of mental phenomena is then different for different classes of these phenomena. The rate of sensation may considerably surpass the rate of motor impulses ; " we do not realize how far the fastest counting falls short of the 1 Estel, in Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, II., heft i., p. 43. 8 L. T. Stevens, in Mind, October, 1886, pp. 393-408. 8 Mind, January, 1886, pp. 55 ff. EEPEODUCTION OF COMPOSITE IMAGES. 491 fastest hearing." The same observers found that the most rapid possible rate of pronouncing the names of letters was greater than that of counting them ; the former being 0.248 sec. per letter for 50 letters, and the latter 0.283 sec. The reasons for this dif- ference are apparently to be found in the fact that counting in- volves a severer strain on the attention and more complex processes of association and discernment in order to give to each number its right name and place in a series of numbers. 24. We are thus led to consider certain researches for deter- mining the reaction-time of yet more complex mental processes, such as involve reproduction of composite images of memory and the association of ideas. The mean duration of association that is, " of the time which is required for the reproduction of an image of memory by some apperceived presentation of sense " has been investigated at great length by Trautscholdt ' under the direction of Wundt. For purposes of experiment the following elaborate classification of the possible kinds of association was adopted. All associations are either (I) External or indirect, or else (II.) Inter- nal or direct. The former are such as are induced by the habit of perceiving objects together simultaneously or successively in space or time, without any interior relation between them ; the latter are such as imply kinship in common properties or other in- herent relations. External associations may, then, be either simul- taneous, as in the case of the parts of a single presentation of sense or of the coexistence of independent presentations ; or they may be successive, as in the case of repeated impressions of sound, of sight, and of the other senses. Internal associations may either be such as involve the relation of ranking one mental object below or above another in terms of genus and species ; or they may follow relations of co-ordination, as similar or contrasted ; or they may follow rela- tions of dependence, as of cause and effect, means and end. To de- termine the time required for a " word-reaction " ( Wr), the experi- menter spoke aloud some word at the instant that he pressed down his key ; and the person reacting indicated the instant at which he apprehended the word. The time required for such reaction was found to have the following mean value for the four persons ex- perimented upon : For W., 0.303 sec.; for B., 0.285 ; for H., 0.280 ; and for T., 0. 173. a The time required for the discernment of a single word is obtained by subtracting from these numbers the simple reaction-time (R) for each individual (Wr E). The result obtained 1 Experimented Untersuchungen iiber d. Association d. Vorstellungen, in Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, I., heft ii., pp. 213-250. 1J Philosoph. Studien, I., heft ii., p. 236. 492 COMPLEX KEACTION-TTME. gave, for W., a "discernment-time "of 0.107sec.;forB., of 0.177; for H., of 0.137 ; and for T., of 0.057. In experiments to determine the duration of association, the person reacting does not press his key until the instant when the reproduction of some idea called forth by hearing the word spoken has fully taken place. For example, on hearing the word " zero " the idea of " infinity " may arise in the mind ; or "market-place" as associated with "market," "port- folio" with "letter," etc. The mean reaction-time for such as- sociation, both before and after subtracting the time for word- reaction alone, was as follows : W. B. H. T. Association-reaction (-47*) .... Sec. 1.009 Sec. 1.037 Sec. 1 154 Sec. 0896 Association-time (Ar Wr). . . . 0.706 0.752 0.874 0.723 The mean duration of association for all the subjects of experi- ment (excluding one for special reasons) is, therefore, placed at 0.727 sec. It takes, that is to say, about f of a second of psycho- physical time to recall a familiar idea associated with a word we hear. This association -time was most prolonged in certain cases where the result may be looked upon as odd and unexpected, or where a pause would seem to have taken place through hesitation between several ideas simultaneously suggested. For example, the association-time which elapsed between the word "pious" and the idea " God-fearing " was 1.132 sec.; between " throne " and " king," 1.437 ; between the German word " Sieg " and " a person of this name," 1.626 ; between "Karl" and "August," 1.662. The mini- mum of association-time was reached with ordinary words where the associated ideas were such as all individuals are likely to have in common. Thus, from " gold " to " silver " required only 0.402 sec.; from "storm" to "wind," 0.368 ; from "clear" to "dark," 0.507; from "north" to "south, "0.502; from "duty" to "right," 0.415; etc. 25. Trautscholdt 1 also found as we should expect that judgments involving subsumption, or the definition of the word heard, required more time than mere association, when they were at all complex. But when very simple, the minimum time for such judgments was about that of association ; and the mean value of " subsumption-time " (0.766) differed but very little from the mean value of " association- time." Thus it required 1.403 sec. to judge that a " ray " is a "'form of the motion of light ; " 2.023 to judge 1 Philosoph. Studien, I., heft ii., p. 245 f. MULTIPLICATION OF TWO NUMBERS. 493 that " fame " is a, " form of the ascription of praise ; " and 1.899 to judge that " art " is an " aesthetic activity " of man ; but only 0.391 sec. to recognize a "mast "as a "part of a ship," and 0.469 to identify "egg" and "cell." The time necessary for multiplying, in the head, two numbers of one figure each has also been investigated by von Vintschgau. 1 The psycho-physical processes involved in this achievement are necessarily somewhat complex. The influence of association must vary largely, according to the number of times we have previously made the same or any very similar calculation. For example, the whole process involved in answering the question, How much is 1x1? is different from that involved when the numbers are 8 x 12 ; much more different when they are quite unfamiliar as, e.g., 76 x 89. The order of the numbers is not indifferent ; as a rule, reaction is quicker and more correct when the smaller number pre- cedes. The mean reaction-time for multiplying two numbers (1 to 10) was 0.211 sec. for L., 0.207 for P., and 0.259 for V., when repro- duction was with the finger ; and 0.200 for L., 0.252 for P., 0.248 for V., when reproduction was with the lip. Of this, 0.049 for L. reproducing with the finger, and 0.096 with the lip ; 0.051 for P. with the finger, and 0.082 with the lip ; and 0.098 for V. with the finger, and 0.087 with the lip are calculated to have been due to the cerebral processes involved in the calculation. As might be expected, any great increase in the speed was found to be accom- panied by an increase in the number of mistakes. Cattell, 2 after objecting on good grounds that the results of the laboratory are always too artificial and often too incorrect to " give the time it takes a man to perceive, to will, and to think," attempted to do away with "involved methods and complicated apparatus," and in simpler fashion determine the time we usually require to see and name an object, such as a letter or a color. He concludes that to see and name letters requires from J to ^ sec. for each letter, and to see and name words that do not make sen- tences requires J to J sec. When the words are connected into sen- tences it requires only about one-half as much time to name them the rate at which one can read varying from 0.138 to 0.484 sec. for each word, according to one's degree of familiarity with the language. Single letters can be named more rapidly when several are in view at the same time ; nearly all persons are helped by hav- ing as many as three, and most persons by having as many as four 1 See Pfliiger's Archiv, xxxvii., pp. 127 ff. s See Mind, January, 1886, p. 63 f.; and Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, II.. heft iv., pp. 635 ff. 494 COMPLEX REACTION-TIME. or five, letters in view at the same time. That is to say (using Wundt's figure of speech), the time of perception, or field of con- sciousness, covers the time of apperception, or clear spot of con- sciousness ; while one presentation of sense is at the focus of consciousness, several others may be coming toward the focus from the background of consciousness. The second letter in view shortens the time of apperception about ^ ; the third, -^ ; the fourth, ^ ; the fifth, ^ sec. 26. Finally, the closing remark of the foregoing paragraph in- troduces the inquiry into the "circuit of consciousness" that is, the number of impressions which can exist within the field of con- scious perception at any one time ? This question has been much debated on abstract or metaphysical grounds touching the nature of the soul. Since the soul is one and simple it has been claimed there can be before it but one object at the same instant of time ; but since all its knowledge is relative, the claim has also been made that at least two impressions are always contemporaneous in consciousness. Hamilton,' on the contrary, concluded, from ob- serving his own mental activities, that the circuit of consciousness could embrace as many as six or seven distinct simultaneous im- pressions. It is evident that only an appeal to facts can decide such a dispute ; it is also evident that the manner of appeal should be more precise and scientific than the one proposed by Hamilton. Experiments have therefore been instituted to determine the " circuit of consciousness," by finding how many regularly recurrent successive impressions of sound, for example, can be so far united into one mental image as to have their likeness or unlikeness to another similar series clearly discerned. The method of experi- ment employed by Dietze 2 was the following : The stroke of a pen- dulum, heard at regular intervals, was employed as the stimulus. After a single stroke as a warning, a series of successive strokes was given, which was begun and ended by the sounding of a clock- bell simultaneously with a stroke of the pendulum. Another series of strokes of the pendulum followed immediately upon the sound which announced that the first series was closed. The second se- ries was ended by simply stopping the pendulum. A fixed number of strokes constituted the first series ; a variable number (either one more or one less than the first series) constituted the second. The question proposed for answer was : How many impressions of sound can be received in the first series and the relation of the second series to the first (as equal, greater, or less) be accurately discerned 1 Lectures on Metaphysics, p. 165. f., and elsewhere. Boston, 1860. 2 Article in Philosopli., Studien, IL, heft iii., pp. 362 ff. EFFECTS OF PRACTICE AND ATTENTION. 495 without counting? The effect upon the subject of such an experi- ment may be described as that of sending through the focus of con- sciousness a train of impressions, in regular succession, from the obscure regions of perception at which they enter to the obscure regions at which they depart from the field of consciousness. An image of the whole field of consciousness, with the line of march of the impressions, must be formed in order accurately to compare two series like those described. The result of such experiments showed that the number of successive impressions which can be comprised within the circuit of consciousness depends upon the rate with which they succeed each other. The most favorable interval was found to be 0.2-0.3 sec. ; with this interval most of the subjects of experiment attained a high degree of accuracy for even as many as ten or twelve impressions. 1 Individual differences were marked, however; thus, for one subject, the time of 0.21 sec. interval was too great for the maximum of accuracy, and 2.0 sec. was so large as to prevent his having any satisfactory apperception of even a single impression. The manner of uniting the impressions was also found to have a great effect upon the circuit of consciousness. When the process of apprehension was allowed to have a rhythmic form of grouping the impressions, the number possible in a single field of consciousness was increased. Without grouping, 16 was the maximum even number, 15 the maximum odd number, at- tained. Rhythmic grouping raised this number to 40, or a little more, as the maximum even number, and to 35, 37, and 39 as the maximum odd numbers. It is possible, then, to apprehend a larger even number than odd number of impressions in a single circuit of consciousness. Certain numbers, perhaps those most familiarly grouped in experience, seem also to have the preference over others. 27. In all experiments to determine the time-relations of mental phenomena, the effects of practice and attention in diminishing psycho-physical time, and of fatigue to increase it, are made ap- parent. Certain special experiments have also been instituted to show how illness, old age, and drugs operate upon the speed of psycho-physical time. Thus Merkel 9 found that the will-time ne- cessary for choice between two motions was reduced by practice, for three subjects of experiment, from 0.080 sec. to 0.050, from 0.097 to 0.0535, and from 0.098 to 0.062, respectively. For choice among 1 See Dietze's statement, Philosoph. Studien, III., heftiii., p. 386, and a note, p. 384, correcting the erronous conclusion drawn by M. Ribot (German Psychology of To-day, p. 278, New York, 1886). * Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, II., heft L, p. 110 f. 496 COMPLEX REACTION-TIME. five and ten possible motions, the effect of practice was yet more marked : thus, with five possible choices, the will-time of one per- son was reduced by practice from 0.239 sec. to 0.083 ; and of an- other, with ten possible choices, from 0.358 to 0.094 For each single day's series of experiments, the time diminished faster at first than subsequently ; but, in many cases, more distinctly on the second than on the first day of experiment. Kries and Auerbach ' discov- ered that, after a short time, further practice has no influence on sim- ple reaction-time ; but some practice is necessary to give any reliable value to such time. The effect of practice on discernment-time is very different. In the experiments upon the localization of tactile sen- sations, the discernment-time for A. was at first as great as 0.064 sec., or even 0.117, but afterward fell to a mean of 0.021. Discernment- time continues to decrease by practice, after all diminution of sim- ple reaction-time has ceased ; it is also transferable to other regions of the same sense. Trautscholdt 2 found that practice for fourteen days reduced the "word-reaction-time" of one subject from 0.309 sec. to 0.149 ; association-time was found to be sensitive to practice in a much smaller degree. The effect of attention must also al- ways be taken into account. It was, apparently, by guarding this carefully, and by practice, that Kries and Auerbach succeeded in obtaining such small values for discernment-time. The effect of distracting the attention was observed by Wundt, 3 who introduced disturbing sensations of the same or of a different sense into series of regularly recurring impressions. Thus, the mean reaction-time for a weak impression of sound was lengthened from 0.189 to 0.313 sec., by a disturbing noise ; and for a strong impression of sound, from 0.158 to 0.203 sec. The mean reaction-time for sight of an electric spark was increased from 0.222 to 0.300 by a disturbing noise occurring simultaneously. All the experiments also make obvious the great influence of individual peculiarities. But this influence may not be in the di- rection in which it would most readily be supposed to lie. For example, Exner 4 found that, of two young men, one of whom had a very lively temperament and the other not, the former had much the longer simple reaction-time (0.3311 sec. as compared with 0.1337). The reaction-time of a man of seventy-seven, taken from the alms- house, was at first 0.9952 sec. ; this was, however, reduced by practice to 0.1866 sec. The enervation produced by a hot summer's day, or 1 Archiv f. Anat. u. Physiol., Physiolog. Abth., 1877, p 361 f. 8 Wundt's Philosoph. Studien, I., heft ii., p 237 f. 3 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 243. 4 Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 268. THE RESULTS OF EXPERIMENT. 497 the exhaustion of a sleepless night, or bad news, etc., increases the reaction-time. A small quantity of wine, slowly drunk, decreased the reaction-time ; but a larger quantity increased it from 0. 1904 sec. to 0.2969, although the subject of the experiment considered himself to be reacting more promptly than usual. Coffee begins to decrease the reaction-time at 20-25 minutes after it is taken, and continues this effect for about 2 hours. Subcutaneous injections of morphine delay ' it ; but this effect does not last long unless the injection is repeated. Obersteiner found that a subject whose re- action-time in the first stage of paralysis was 0.166 sec., gradually lost control of himself until, in the last stages when experiment was possible, the interval was 0.281-0.753. Buccola, who has experi- mented upon idiots, imbeciles, epileptics, etc., finds that the dura- tion of perception is lengthened in all these cases, with the exception of some forms of abnormal excitement. 28. On summing up the results of all the experiments hitherto made in psychometry, we can only reiterate what we began by say- ing : Experimental research does not explain the origin or nature of our idea of time and its relations, nor has it succeeded in estab- lishing many new principles of great moment for psychology. It is, however, a vigorous and promising branch of psycho-physical study. It has placed upon a scientific basis, and defined in accurate mathematical terms, many of our ordinary impressions as to the time-relations of mental phenomena. The attempt to analyze psy- cho-physical time seems to show that its various elements of simple perception, apperception, or clear discernment, and volition, occur in the order named, and yet ordinarily overlap each other, as it were. Practice and attention, under the most favorable circumstances, may reduce either one nearly to zero. In this way, simple reaction-time becomes most nearly equal to purely physiological or reflex time ; reaction-time, with discernment, is almost reduced to simple per- ception-time ; and the duration required by will-time for solving a dilemma is wellnigh eliminated. Conclusions as to the existence and intercerebral relations of nervous centres of apperception and volition would be premature, and probably misleading, in the present state of this science. Nor have we as large hopes as to its ability "to solve many of the old problems " in the future as have been expressed by some of its enthusiastic students. 1 See von Vintschgau andDietl, in Pfliiger's Archiv, xvi., pp. 316 ff ; and Exner, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 270 f. 32 CHAPTER IX. FEELINGS AND MOTIONS. 1. FBOM this point onward the study of Physiological Psychol- ogy is compelled to content itself with opinions much more in- definite and uncertain even than those to which we have already become accustomed. Theories of the localization of cerebral func- tion, of the quantity and quality of sensations and their combina- tion into presentations of sense, and of the time-relations of mental phenomena, admit to a considerable extent of experimental tests. But the feelings and their physical basis elude the efforts made to subject them to the conditions of a strictly scientific investigation. The same complaint may be justified concerning all opinions as to the physical basis of the higher intellectual operations, and as to the effect of age, temperament, sex, and race, upon the character and development of the mind. No attempt whatever will be made to conceal the meagre, obscure, and doubtful character of the evi- dence upon which our conjectures must be based. Indeed, on these matters nothing but the greatest caution is fitted to inspire confidence ; the supreme wisdom is not infrequently a frank con- fession of ignorance or uncertainty. About our "Feelings" so-called their nature, origin, relation to a physical basis and to sensations and ideas we know remark- ably little. Nor has any classification of the feelings hitherto been made which is entitled to command general assent. The reason for this fact is not difficult to discover. By their very nature, the phenomena are obscure, indefinite, and yet extremely variable and multiform. They are also connected with our sensations and ideas in such a way as to make all separation in fact quite impossible. The psychology of the feelings, as studied from the introspective point of view, has therefore always been peculiarly unproductive of assured results. The fact that their physiological conditions are laid so largely in obscure, rapid, and infinitely varied changes within the central organs, such as cannot be either directly ob- served or indirectly subjected to experimentation, increases the difficulties of the subject. What is the nature of feeling ? How do DIFFERENT THEORIES OF FEELING. 499 the different feelings differ, and what elements have they in com- mon ? Under what conditions do we have sensuous feelings ; and under what conditions are these feelings pleasant or unpleasant ? Is feeling ever perfectly indifferent ; is there a zero-point of feel- ing ? How are the feelings related to the quality and intensity of physical stimuli ? What is the physiological basis (if any exist) of the higher aesthetic, moral, and religious feelings ? l These and other similar questions may be asked of psycho-physical science with little satisfactory result. 2. Many diverse views have been held as to the essential na- ture of feeling. These views may, for the most part, however, be classified under two heads : They are either such as emphasize the dependence of the feelings on bodily conditions, and so resort to physiological explanation of their origin and nature ; or else they are such as emphasize their dependence upon relations that obtain among the so-called " ideas," or purely mental states and products of the mind. 1 The extreme form of one of these two theories holds that feeling is always merely a consciousness of a certain condition of the nervous elements. The extreme form of the other leads to the position from which all feeling is regarded as a sort of sec- ondary consciousness of the " furtherance " or " hindrance " of one idea by another. The principal real ground for the former theory lies in the fact that certain conditions of the nervous elements under stimulation are, as a rule, followed by painful, and certain others by pleasurable, feeling. The latter theory is based solely upon the truth that certain mental states called " ideas " are, as a rule, accompanied or followed by corresponding modes of being affected which have the characteristic tone of all feeling that is, are either agreeable or disagreeable, Neither of these views, however, serves to define the essential nature of feeling, since to feel is as simple and funda- mental an operation of mind as it is to know. Feeling can never be stated in terms of knowledge. Inasmuch, then, as all definition is only the expression of an elaborate and complex form of knowl- edge> the nature of feeling is not capable of being defined ; it must be felt. When, then, this nature is defined as consisting in some relation to physical sensation or to mental images, it is de- prived of the very characteristic which makes it to be feeling rather than sensation or idea. Both theories, however, have succeeded in stating certain conditions or antecedents of the reaction of mind in the way of feeling. 3. The foundations for a physiological theory of the feelings 1 Comp. Hortricz, Psychologische Analysen, i. , p. 21 f. 500 NATUKE AND KINDS OF FEELING. were laid by Lotze, ' with that blending of scientific caution and psy- chological insight which characterize most of his work. He distin- guished the feelings, as mental conditions of pain or pleasure, from sensations as indifferent elements of our percepts of things. Yet, iu fact, sensations are always, or usually, colored with feeling ; and analysis is therefore obliged here to distinguish in theory what co- exists in fact. Feelings are of two kinds : " sensuous," as corning from bodily impressions ; and " intellectual," as flowing from the relations of ideas. Pleasurable feelings always arise from the co- incidence, and painful from the opposition, between the effects of the stimulus and any one of those conditions to which the regular expression of the bodily or spiritual life is attached. Yet even this statement is not true without making further explanations and limitations. For something bitter may be harmless, or even bene- ficial ; and acetate of lead may be sweet and pleasant, but deadly. More precisely, then, " feeling is, in general, only the measure of the partial and momentary concord between the effect of the stimu- lus and the conditions of vital activity." 2 Lotze was far too keen a psychologist, however, to suppose that in laying down this law he was explaining the nature of feeling as a secondary^ and derived form of consciousness. He has himself vindicated its right to be regarded as primitive, and not deducible from either sensations or ideas. 3 But even in the way in which he understood his own theory, much doubt may be thrown upon its truth. It is admitted by all that certain intensities of nearly all forms of stimuli are both productive of painful feeling and also antagonistic tolhe vltaTconditions of the organism. Undoubtedly, also, suffering 'is both an indication and a cause of abnormal and injurious action of the nervous mechanism. But that the feeling of pain measures the degree of this antagonism, or that everything found at the time dis- agreeable is in any degree demonsti'ably opposed to the vital wel- fare of the organism, cannot be assumed ; and the alleged law even seems incompatible with the individual peculiarities which charac- terize what is agreeable or disagreeable to the senses of different persons. The excessive stimulus of the surgeon's knife is not ren- dered any more really in accord with the conditions of the vital activity of the organ to which it is applied by the fact that anaes- thetics prevent the pain which would otherwise result. An exces- sive and immediately injurious stimulation of considerable portions of the body may be accompanied by a large amount of positive 1 Medicin. Psych ologie, pp. 233 ff. 2 Ibid. 3 See Metaphysic, p. 474, Oxford, 1884; and Microcosmus, i. p. 1771, Edinburgh, 1885. PHYSIOLOGICAL LAW OF FEELING. 501 pleasure or, at most, with very little pain, while a small and quite harmless degree of another kind of stimulation may result in great discomfort. Attention, association, and control of the will have also much to do with determining the subjective state which is con- nected with any given relation between the effect of the stimulus and the conditions of vital activity. 4. More recent attempts to give a general physiological law for the phenomena of pleasurable and painful feeling can scarcely be said to be any more satisfactory. It is true, as Bain l declares, that " a very considerable number of the facts may be brought under the following principle, namely, that states of pleasure are connected with an increase, and states of pain with an abatement, of some, or all, of the vital functions." But other facts in no small number cannot be brought under this principle. It is not a difficult task for the physician to abate all the vital functions of the patient, even down to or beyond the line of danger, with the immediate result of pro- ducing pleasure rather than pain. After objecting to Bain's state- ment as being " too vague," etc., Grant Allen 2 declares the true principle of connection to be the following : " Pleasure is the con- comitant of the healthy action of any or all of the organs or mem- bers supplied with afferent cerebro-spinal nerves, to an extent not exceeding the ordinary powers of reparation possessed by the sys- tem." ^Esthetic pleasure he provisionally defines as " the subjec- tive concomitant of the normal amount of activity, not directly connected with life-serving function, in the peripheral end-organs of the cerebro-spinal nervous system." : Now, (that pleasure is the reflex of healthy and unimpeded activity is an old psychological truism ; and that we are dependent upon impulses propagated in the sensory nerves of the cerebro-spinal system for sensations, pleasureable or painful, of muscular, organic, or more special sort, scarcely needs statement as a newly discovered law of "physiologi- cal aesthetics. " Nothing, however, could well be more "vague" than the limit fixed by the words "to an extent not exceeding the ordinary powers of reparation possessed by the system." Does the man whose powers of nervous reparation are extraordinarily great necessarily find his quinine any the pleasanter? The statement that pain is a warning of danger from excessive or abnormal activ- ity of the nervous system must, of course, be accepted as summing up a large number of facts ; but there are other facts not easily brought under such statement. Moreover, until we have some objec- 1 The Senses and the Intellect, p. 281 f. 2 Physiological ^Esthetics, London, 1877, p. 21. 3 Ibid., p. 34. 502 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. tive means of determining what is the " normal amount" of function in any tissue, the alleged law that pleasure is " the subjective con- comitant " of such amount is of little or no value. ; The whole sub- ject is left in that indefinite condition which invites us, on the one hand, to consider pain as the proof that the function of the nervous system which occasions it is destructive ; and then tells us, on the other hand, that the essence of the pain is in its being the subjec- tive concomitant of such function, j 5. But if purely physiological theories of feeling do not suc- ceed in defining its nature, or in stating the relation between the action of the nerves and the pleasureable or painful tone of the feeling, the success of the second class of theories is no greater. Of this class the views of Nahlowsky,' as set forth in his interest- ing monograph, are perhaps the best example. This author begins by drawing a sharp distinction between sensation and feeling. The " tone " of sensations as pleasant or unpleasant he would not call by the term "feeling ; " such tone is rather that which gives us " the how " (" Wie ) of the sensation, and depends for its pleasant, or unpleasant character upon whether the effect of the stimulus furthers or inhibits the functions of the vegetative life. Even those states of consciousness which are constituted from various ele- ments due to stimulations of the nerves at various quarters not defi- nitely localized, and ordinarily called " common feeling," Nahlow- sky would define as " common sensations." Pain also is a sensation and not a feeling. But feeling, according to this author, is neither tone nor quality of sensation ; though it may be an elevation or de- pression of mind produced indirectly by the sensations. Feelings> properly characterized, comprise all the conditions resulting from the simultaneous existence of ideas in the mind, which either sup- port or interfere with each other. In the former case, they are agreeable ; in the latter, disagreeable. They are, then, secondary conditions of mind, dependent on ideas, recognized as not of bodily origin, but as having a content of a mental rather than physical order. Hunger, thirst, weariness, shivering, etc., are sensations ; sympathy love, gratitude, reverence, admiration, etc., are feelings. According- ly, feeling is defined as " the immediate consciousness of the momen- tary rising or depression of one's own psychical activity" (that is, of the movement of the ideas). Even to the affections this theory would deny a place among the kinds of feeling for the former spring frojn the latter under the mediating influence of organic effects. *The foregoing view of the nature of feeling is adhered to sub- 1 Das Gefiihlsleben, in seiner wesentlichsten Ersclieinungen u. Beziigen, 2d ed. Leipzig, 1884. PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF FEELING. 503 stantially by many others, especially by the followers of Herbart. Thus Drbal ' holds that feelings are not primitive states of mind, but result from the reciprocal action of ideas if this ideating ac- tivity is one of reciprocal inhibition, the feeling which is the be- coming conscious of the inhibition is unpleasant ; if the activity is one of reciprocal combination, the conscious feeling of this fact is pleasant. Feeling in general is therefore the immediate conscious- ness of the rising or falling of one's power of ideating, as it were. ) Beneke, 2 also, considers that two mental images excited belong to every feeling ; of these, one is that which is felt, and the other is one "against" which the first is felt. Feeling and no-feeling, or this or that feeling, can therefore attach itself to one and the same image. Volkmann von Volkmar, in his great work, 3 considers feeling as the consciousness of the process of ideation itself as distinguished from consciousness of this or that idea, and it is conditioned upon some resistance being offered to the process. Feeling is, then, no one proper idea, to be placed in conjunction or classed with others. It is rather a becoming conscious of the degree of tension, as it were, which characterizes the process of ideation at each particular mo- ment. The condition of the origin of a feeling is, then, the existence of two simultaneous opposed ideas. Their coexistence occasions a state of tension (" Spannung "), as it were, and this state gives way as one idea triumphs over the other. The type of simple feel- ing may be illustrated by the condition in which the mind finds itself when listening to harmonious or discordant musical sounds. 6. The theory which makes feeling a derived consciousness de- pendent upon the relations of the ideas as furthering or checking each other is unsatisfactory. It cannot be admitted, to begin with, that feeling is a secondary or derived form of consciousness. No form of mental activity is more primitive and unanalyzable than feeling ; none is earlier in the development of mental life. 4 Be- fore the infant has localized the different sensations, and combined them into percepts of the different parts of its own organism, the consciousness of being affected in a given way, either pleasur- able or not, must predominate. Other forms of feeling of desire, uneasiness, comfort, etc. are inseparably connected with its first states of consciousness ; they belong to its inherited impulses and 1 Lehrbuch d. empirischen Psychologie, 2d ed., pp. 200 ff. Wien, 1875. 2 Lehrbuch d. Psychologie als Naturwissenschaft, pp. 170 ff. Berlin, 1877. 3 Lehrbuch d. Psychologie, II., pp. 298 ff. 4 This view of the feelings is maintained by Horwicz, and developed at length, polemically, by Lotze (Horwicz, Psychologische Analysen, i., p. 168 f . ; Lotze, Medicin. Psychologie, p. 235 f . ; and references already cited in note p. 500). 504 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. instincts, and are only later definitely related to the appropriate ideas. The primary formation of self-consciousness is quite as truly connected with self -feeling, pleasurable or painful, as with the process of ideation in constructing the concept of "me " and "not-me." Moreover, although we are to distinguish sensation from feeling, we must regard the feeling which inseparably accompanies sensa- tion as feeling, strictly speaking, and not as tone of sensation ; or, in other words, the tone of every sensation, as either pleasurable or painful, is given to it by the feeling which accompanies and blends with it. The sensation, as having a certain quality, quan- tity, and locality, is capable of being built into a "Thing" which the mind perceives as not-itself. But the feeling, the pleasurable or painful tone of the sensation, is always recognized as purely and simply a way in which the mind is affected. To refuse to speak of sensations and emotions, with all their complicated physical basis, as belonging at all in the realm of " feeling," is to restrict the use of the word unwarrantably. The Herbartian theory commits in this matter the mistake which it is guilty of committing repeatedly ; it regards the " ideas " as realities that have in some sort a sub- stantial existence, and can do something by way of furthering or hindering each other. But ideas are themselves nothing more than mental products that exist only when and so long as the mind acts with a definite degree and kind of energy. In determining the kind and degree of this ideating energy, the previous action and habit of the mind by way of feeling is quite as influential upon the mode of feeling as is the manner of its ideating energy. Finally, this theory wrecks itself upon the denial of all that which the phys- iological theory maintains and establishes. The two theories, then, supplement and correct each other ; but even when combined they only tell us in part what are the physical and mental conditions under which feeling arises. 7. The truth appears to be as follows : Feeling is an original and underlined form of consciousness, or mode of the operation of con- scious mind. It can neither be defined by, nor deduced from, sensation or ideation. To know what it is to feel, the highest in- telligence of itself would be incapable. Such knowledge comes only from having felt. Feeling accompanies all mental experience, both that of sensation and of the higher- intellectual processes. It un- doubtedly has a certain physical basis ; and certain laws may be stated which discover some of the relations that hold good between conditions of the nervous system and resulting conditions of feel- ing. Certain other laws may be laid down which partially define CLASSIFICATION OF THE FEELINGS. 505 the relations existing between the purely intellectual and the feel- ing activities, or reactions, of mind. These two sets of laws give us the physical and the intellectual conditions of different tones of feeling respectively. But no one law has yet been discovered which covers all the facts of relation, either between feeling and the bodily states or between feeling and the ideas. Nor is it likely that any such law exists to be discovered. Manifold relations, as determined by heredity, individual peculiarities, association, atten- tion, etc., always exist, and contribute to the complex result. 8. The various attempts to establish fixed classes of the feelings can scarcely be pronounced more satisfactory than the attempts to define their nature. Very great difficulties stand in the way of such a classification, of which the following are most important : The phenomena are themselves very obscure, changeable, and multi- form. ; they are also inextricably associated with the phenomena of sensation and ideation. Moreover, the theory held by any inquirer as to the origin and nature of the feelings is pretty sure to deter- mine his classification of them. For example, two before-men- tioned authorities (Nahlowsky ' and Drbal 2 ), as a result of the " ideational " theory, divide the feelings into (1) such as are de- pendent on the form of the course of ideas, and (2) such as are conditioned by the content of the ideas. Besides these simple classes of feelings, one of these writers speaks of certain " mixed feelings," that are feelings of oscillation and change. Under the " formal " feelings, or such as are dependent on the form of the course of representation, the other writer finds four classes namely, (a) feelings of expectation and impatience, (6) of hope, anxiety, sur- prise, and doubt, (c) of tedium, and (d) refreshment and work all according to the aspect of the ideas in time-form. Four kinds of " qualitative " feelings are also distinguished these are the intel- lectual, the sesthetic, the moral, and the religious according as the ideas exciting the feelings refer to truth, beauty, morality, or religion. But the foregoing attempts and all similar attempts at classifying the feelings lay a false emphasis upon the dependence of certain feelings on mental representation ; they thus overlook all those considerations on which the physiological theories of feeling rightfully insist. But, on the other hand, the classifications made under the in- fluence of the physiological theory are even more unsatisfactory. In their desire to reduce all the phenomena of human feeling under some one physical " law," so called, they bring the higher forms of 1 Das Gefiihlsleben, p. 44 f. 2 Lehrbucli d. empir. Psycliologie, p. 205 f. 506 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. feeling into a much closer and more complete connection with the feelings of sensation than the facts will warrant. Thus, with Grant Allen, the aesthetic feelings are "the cumulative effect of many infinitesimal physiological factors," 1 which differ from the pleasures and pains of sensation chiefly in the fact that the activity of the end-organs in them is " not directly connected with life-serving function ; " 2 all the different tastes of different individuals, their varying "perceptions of beauty and ugliness," are then boldly stated to be " depending on the structural variations of the nervous system." Horwicz's more profound theory as to the nature of feeling leads him to a more satisfactory classification of its forms. The variety of feeling, he holds, is dependent on the natural organic variety in the activities of the soul. 3 Thus we derive (1) the sensuous feelings, or such as depend on the different qualities of the sensations of the special senses and of common feeling ; (2) the aesthetic feelings, or those agreeable or disagreeable forms of consciousness which cor- respond to the mental images of perception and imagination ; (3) the intellectual feelings, which correspond to the theoretic interests called out by the higher forms of thinking ; (4) the moral feelings, or those which correspond to the relations of desire and will. The development of these feelings in varying relations to each other gives rise to various mixed or complex forms. Certain moods and characteristic affections result from the combined tone, color, and rhythm, of the simple feelings, and the strength with which the physical organism reacts. Higher feelings, or " feelings of feel- ings," unfold themselves ; these are dependent upon the complex relations of society as organized in its several existing forms. . A recent writer in Mind,* after criticising all previous attempts at classification of the feelings, proposes an exceedingly elaborate substitute for them all ; but this substitute is so burdened with uncouth terminology, is founded on so many false or doubtful psy- chological assumptions, and involves so many artificial distinctions and cross divisions, that it is little likely to meet with general ac- ceptance. 9. Another and insuperable difficulty in the way of a strict classification of the feelings is the fact that they are actually, and as peculiar conditions of consciousness, unclassifiable. In other words, no principle of classification can be suggested which will undeniably apply to them all. For example, if we classify them 1 Physiological ^Esthetics, p. 42. a Ibid. , p. 34. * Psychologische Analysen, ii., p. 82 f. 4 Mercier, July and October, 1884, and January, 1885. PRIMITIVE CHAEACTEK OF FEELING. 507 into pleasurable or painful, we indicate in this way only a quality of tone which itself constantly varies in dependence on more per- manent characteristics. Besides, it is not easy to demonstrate that feelings are never indifferent (neither agreeable or disagreeable) in tone. If we classify according to the anatomical part or phys- iological function of the nervous system which chiefly gives con- ditions to the feelings, we can carry our classification only a little way without resorting to unwarrantable assumptions. Indeed, there are grounds for supposing that the feelings are of central origin that is, have their physiological basis in those regions of the nervous system that have thus far almost wholly eluded sci- entific research. If we classify according to the relation of each feeling to other activities of the soul (as Horwicz does), we en- counter the facts that sense, will, and intellect, doubtless all enter into all the activities connected with our developed feeling ; but that the measure of the degree in which they are influential upon feeling is so uncertain and changeable as to render it unfit to serve as a basis for classification. No hard and fixed line can be drawn about the different so-called classes of feelings. Feeling, with its color-tone of pain or pleasure, enters into all conscious life. The aesthetic feelings cannot be separated from the sensuous ; for example, the feeling which accompanies the sensation of a musical chord, or of the color pur- ple, may be classed under either head. Nor can the intellectual feelings be separated from the aesthetic ; the perception of harmony of colors and sound is inseparably connected with aesthetic and sensuous feeling, and the latter is intensified or otherwise modified under the intellectual laws, of contrast, change, habit, and higher association. Even the feelings which we call " moral," on account of their connection with will and desire, often have an indefinite part of them so combined with feelings located in the bodily organism, or so dependent on its functions for their quantity and quality, that a strict separation becomes impossible. Love is seldom or never so purely ideal as not plainly to involve in itself feeling of sensuous and aesthetic sort ; hate not mixed with anger, and so supported on some elements of that physical basis which underlies the latter, is hard to discover in real life. All psycho- logical analysis that would extend to the point of establishing fixed classes of the psychical activities is difficult ; but in the special case of the feelings, the character of experience is such as to make strict classification impossible. Accordingly, in treating of the feelings from the physiological point of view we shall content ourselves with selecting certain ex- 508 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. amples from the current classes which admit of being thus treated most successfully. Such are, obviously, the so-called sensuous feel- ings, the so-called common feeling, certain aesthetic feelings, certain of the feelings known as emotions or affections, and certain feelings connected with the functions of will especially the feeling of effort, 10. All feelings are characterized by tone, strength, rhythm, and content. 1 Their content is determined by the ideating activity with which they are directly connected, or to which they are relat- ed ; and this content may be simple, as is the case with the feeling connected with the presentation of a colored surface (for example, purple or green), or complex, as is the case with the sentiments of patriotism, loyalty, and religious devotion. Feelings, like all other mental phenomena, occur under time- form; they are, in general, rhythmic in character, and change in re- spect to content, tone, and intensity, with a movement marked more or less distinctly by the quality of periodicity. Their rhythm, with respect to content, is, of course, determined by the recur- rence of changes in the ideating activity as dependent especial^ upon attention and the laws of association. -Feelings of sadness or joy, comfort or discomfort, may come around again in conscious- ness, as it were, according to the rhythmic movement of the sensa- tions which occasion them. Sometimes an alternation of tone takes place, which carries the mind back and forth by the point of indif- ference (or hypothetical zero-point of feeling) between agreeable and disagreeable sensations, or ideas of the same kind. Thus we are sometimes forced to say that we do not know whether a certain combination of colors, or quality of taste or smell, is pleasing to us or not ; in such a case feeling seems to move rhythmically back and forth between a slightly pronounced tone of pleasure and a slightly pronounced tone of pain. The intensity, too, of feelings rises and falls alternately in de- pendence upon the rhythmic movement of the nervous processes and of the train of ideas. No feeling is kept at a long continu- ous level with respect to its vigor and pitch of strength. The law of quickly alternating exhaustion and repair of the nervous elements underlies, to a large extent, this rhythmic movement of the intensity of the feelings. This is one of many proofs which go to show that the conditions of the end-organs and of the central organs (comp. p. 108 f .) are determinative of the tone and strength of feeling. Even when we are strictly attending to our painful feeling, the toothache is not a perfectly uniform and steady strain ; even when we are doing our best to abstract attention from the 1 Comp. Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologie, II., p. 311 f. THE TONE OF ALL FEELING. 509 pain, we succeed only intermittently. But the course of the ideas must also be taken into account as influencing the rhythm of feel- ing. As our sensations or mental images become more clear and vivid, the feelings attached to them gather strength ; as the former become more obscure and feeble, the feelings also die away in consciousness. 11. The tone of all feeling is either one of pleasure or of pain (using these words in their widest possible meaning). The feeling of pleasure and pain is probably the most general, most simple, and earliest psychical process. That almost all feelings are characterized by some positive tone or, in other words, are not absolutely in- different to us there can be no question. Is it agreeable or dis- agreeable, at least in some slight degree and "in some more or less indefinite manner ? is an inquiry which we can pretty readily an- swer with respect to nearly all our sensations and ideas. The question has been debated, however, whether this is necessarily true of all our feelings. Is there any such thing as completely ''neutral" feeling, or feeling that is in no respect or degree either agreeable or disagreeable to us? Neutral or indifferent feelings were recog- nized by Keid, but disputed by Hamilton. 1 Bain asserts it as un- doubted that " we may feel, and yet be neither pleased nor pained," and that "almost every pleasurable and painful sensation and emo- tion passes through a stage or moment of indifference." 2 Wundt 3 argues, on theoretical grounds, that pleasure and pain, as tones of feeling belonging to sensation, are conditions which may be regarded as on different sides of a zero-point, or point of indif- ference lying between them. It does not follow, however, that, because the mind passes in time from feeling of one positive tone (pleasure) to feeling of the opposite tone (pain), it must, therefore, at some instant be in a state of feeling that has no tone and lies between the two. The curve plotted to represent the rise and fall Xof feeling is a material line ; it cannot be at one time below, and at another above, the abscissa-line, without at some single point (the zero-point) coinciding with it. But it does not follow that, because such a curve is a picture of the phenomena of feeling in one respect, it is so in all other respects. The question whether there is any zero-point to the tone of feeling can only be answered by an appeal to consciousness ; and this answer, like all others given to similar appeals, is likely to contain dubious and conflicting elements. It is quite certain that one can pass from a high state of pleasure to 1 Hamilton's Works of Thomas Reid, p. 311. Edinburgh, 1854. 2 The Emotions and the Will, p. 13. 3 Physiolog. Psychologic, i. , p. 465 f. 510 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. one of intense pain without any interpolated neutral feeling. For example, if while one is viewing a beautiful landscape one is stung by hornets, the condition of quiet massive pleasure may be converted into one of great physical suffering without any intervening feel- ing of indifference. We incline, then, to agree with Sully : in af- firming that every feeling is either pleasurable or painful in some degree. " We apply the name 'feelings,' " says Lotze, 2 " exclusively to states of pleasure and pain, in contrast with sensations as indif- ferent perceptions of a certain content." 12. Various questions may be raised as to the physical appar- atus, the nervous elements and processes, for pleasurable or pain- ful feeling, w ? hich cannot be answered satisfactorily. Are there special nervous elements whether end-organs, or nerve-fibres, or nerve-tracts and centres in the central organs which must be ex- cited in order to give rise to the feeling of pain ? If the apparatus for feeling is the same as that for the sensations to which the feel- ing gives its color-tone, do the feeling and the sensations imply different processes in these same elements as the physical basis on which they rest ? Is not pleasure, rather, the result of a normal and moderate amount of process in these elements ; and pain the result of a process in the same elements whose amount has been increased so as to be destructive or injurious to the tissue involved ? Lotze 3 raised these questions, and answered them with the opinion, somewhat doubtfully expressed, that sensation and feeling are due to two forms of processes in the same nervous elements, and that there is no need of assuming special organs of feeling, whether peripheral or central. Probably the prevalent view hitherto has been, that the same apparatus of end-organs, conducting nerve- tracts, and central areas, which on moderate excitement produces the simple sensations of pressure or of temperature, or the more complex sensations of tickling, shuddering, etc., produces the feel- ing of pain when irritated with increased intensity. Such a view would apparently have also to hold that muscular sensations have the same physical apparatus as do feelings of muscular weariness or exhaustion ; and, perhaps, that cardialgia and hunger are due to modifications of the action of the same nerves of the stomach. But from the psychological point of view it is as certain that sensations of pressure or mere temperature are unlike the feeling of pleasure produced by gentle rubbing or by comfortable warmth, or the pain 1 Outlines of Psychology, p. 449, New York, 1884 ; and comp. Volkmann von Volkmar, Lehrb. d. Psychologie, II., p. 311 f. * Outlines of Psychology, p. 73. Boston, 1886. 3 See Medicin. Psychologie, pp. 245 ff. PHYSICAL APPARATUS OF FEELING. 511 that comes from heavy pressure or burning, as it is that sensations of light are unlike those of musical tone. Besides the obvious difference which the results of exciting it have in consciousness, there are other and physiological reasons for doubting the complete identity of the nervous apparatus of pleasurable and painful feeling with that of the sensations with which the feeling is allied. The facts upon which Schiff and others support the view that nervous impulses resulting in pain travel by more or less distinct paths along the spinal cord have already been stated (Part I., chap. HI, 32). The most recent experiments seem to show that the end-organs of temperature, pressure, and pain are locally separable in the different minute areas of the skin (Part II., chap. IV., 21 f.). Pathological results indicating the same separa- tion of the nervous elements of feeling also deserve a brief men- tion. In certain cases the sensibility of the skin to pain is lost (a condition called "analgesie" by Beau, and " analgie " by Lotze), while its sensibility to touch is not weakened or is even increased. The reverse condition also sometimes occurs. " Analgie," as occa- sioned by pathological states of the spinal cord due to lead-poison- ing, was noticed in many cases by Beau. This loss of sensibility to pain can hardly be explained by any change in the activity of cer- tain end-organs common, both to touch and to painful feeling. "What impairment of function could possibly result in destroying the sen- sitiveness to strong mechanical and thermic excitations, such as ordinarily occasion great pain, while the response by way of sensa- tions of touch to much feebler excitations remains undiminished? The same argument would appear decisive against identifying, lo- cally, the central nervous processes which result in sensation with those which result in feeling. In certain stages of narcosis, produced by ether or chloroform, the patient is able to perceive the slightest contact with the skin, but feels no pain even when the same area is treated severely. Moreover, in some cases of tabes dorsahs, a con- stant difference seems to exist in the time at which the sensations of pressure and the feelings of pain, simultaneously excited at the end- organ, arise in the mind. If the patient is pricked with a needle, he will instantly feel the contact, and the pain only one to two second slater. 1 The case of the eye, which responds with sensations of light and color when the optic nerve is moderately excited, and with the painful feeling of being blinded when the stimulus is in- creased, is not perfectly clear. For cases of amaurosis are on 1 See Funke, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., ii., p. 297 f. ; such phenomena have been especially discussed by Osthoff, Die Verlangsamung d. Schmerzempfindung bei Tabes dorsalis, Erlangen, 1874. 512 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. record where the painful feeling persisted after the eye had lost all power to distinguish light. It has been argued, therefore, that while the specific sensations of light and color are due to the irri- tation of the optic nerve, the excitement of feeling indicates a si- multaneous irritation of part of the trigeminus. We are compelled, then, to confess that the localizing of the nervous apparatus, and the nature of the physiological processes which form the physical basis of painful and pleasurable feeling, require further investigation. The tendency of the evidence, how- ever, is toward a theory which assigns to feeling a more or less separate mechanism of end-organs, conducting nerve-tracts, and central areas (or at least of nervous elements in the central areas). But how such a theory will reconcile itself with the other familiar facts which appear, obviously, to make the tone of feeling depend upon the degree of intensity which the nervous processes attain, it is impossible to predict. 13. One kind of feeling, which has the tone of pleasure or pain belonging to all feeling, is undoubtedly of central nervous origin ; this is the so-called sensus communis, or "common feeling." 1 Such feeling may have more or less of content of one kind or another, according to the state of perception and ideation with which it is combined. Nervous impulses of indefinite variety and the most manifold peripheral origin are constantly pouring in, as it were, upon the cerebral centres each one contributing some element to the characteristic tone of consciousness. The resulting feelings are modes of our being affected which are not converted into definite presentations of sense, or referred to a particular part of our own bodies. The effect of changes in the minute blood-vessels and other capillaries about the nerve-endings, the presence of impuri- ties in the blood, the condition of the lower cerebral centres, the action of the heart and lungs and other internal organs, and the connection of the sympathetic with the cerebro- spinal nervous sys- tem, are all felt in this way. Moreover, inasmuch as few (if any) sensations are without some tone of feeling, while many sensations are exceedingly heterogeneous in their elements, and not clearly referred to the place of their origin, a melange, as it were, of ob- scure bodily affections is readily formed. Sensations in themselves heterogeneous may also be brought into a temporary relation by the partial identity of their source of excitation, and of the nervous connections in the central organs. It is also always a very important question, how the more obscure 1 Com p. Funke, Der Tastsinn u. d. Gemeiugefiihle, in Hermann's Haudb. d. Physiol., III., ii., pp. 289 ff. COMPOSITION OF COMMON FEELING. 513 and mixed bodily feelings stand related to the mind's course of idea- tion, to attention, association, etc. This relation often determines whether such obscure impressions shall be definitely objectified or not ; whether they shall not rather run together in the dark stream of common feeling. Let anyone suspend for an instant a train of interesting thought, which has up to the moment been interrupted only by certain obscure feelings of uneasiness, and such one will be able instantly to select and localize in the cramped chest, or op- pressed limbs, or tired organs of special sense, most of the sensa- tions whose painful tone has thus colored the stream of common feeling. Separation from localized sensations is, then, the chief negative characteristic of common feeling. 1 Under its different principal forms we may distinguish different total results, according to the general relation in which the being aware merely that we are affected in an agreeable or disagreeable manner stands to the being aware of what affects us in this manner. Thus we sometimes feel well or ill, elevated or depressed, without ability to assign these feelings at all definitely to the physical organism, either as perceived or imaged, or to any reason in the train of ideas. At other times the general impression of being in the body, for some greater or less amount of either weal or woe, is emphatic ; we feel ill all over, or seem to enjoy the coursing of the blood through every artery and vein, as though mentally present in the extended tissues. 14. According to Strieker, 2 information derived from the pe- ripheral nerves consists of either sensations or feelings ; the latter implies self -reference, which may be of two kinds. If this reference extends to the whole sensorium, and so to the whole organism, the feelings are called " common " or ." collective ;" under certain cir- cumstances they appear as fixing the mood of our consciousness. Some of the organs, in their sound condition, have no organic feel- ings ; others of them undoubtedly largely determine the character of our common feeling by their condition, tension, action, etc. / If, now, we extend the sensations of touch so as to include all the ob- scurely localized organic and muscular sensations, we feel the neces- sity of distinguishing such sensations from what we have called the "common feeling." One characteristic which the sensations have as sensations, strictly speaking, concerns the method of their excitation. In general, the stimulus must affect the nerves through the specific end-organs of sense, in order to give rise to a proper sensation. E. H. Weber sought to prove that, whenever nerves are irritated, not through the 1 Comp. Lotze, Medicin. Psychologie, p. 278 f. 8 Studien iiber d. Bewusstsein, p. 17 f. Wien, 1879. 514 NATURE AND KINDS OF FEELING. end-organs, but along the trunk, the irritation gives rise to feelings of pain instead of sensations. One experiment for this purpose consisted in dipping the point of the elbow into ice-cold water ; when the sensation of cold is at once located in the skin, and the feeling of pain arises as soon as the stimulus has penetrated to the trunk of the nerve lying beneath. But other experiences seem to show that tones of common feeling may be indirectly excited, which are characterized by the massing of a great number of minute and obscurely localized sensations of touch. For example, the prick of a needle is felt at a given point as a circumscribed pain. The tick- ling from a feather, confined to a small surface, may be regarded as consisting of complex sensations of light pressure, with no fixed locality for each one, but localized in general at about such a spot. But the tickling may be continued until a general tone of painful feeling is developed, which quite overwhelms all localized sensa- tions. These phenomena may be considered as agreeing with the other phenomena to show that common feeling is due to widely extended and complex conditions of the central areas, in which the results of a large number of separate peripheral stimulations may unite so as to lose all their individual character, although each one contributes something to the common result. 15. There are feelings so connected with the operation of the organs of sense as to be called feelings of sensation. A certain tone of feeling (a third element, as distinguished from its specific quality and intensity) belongs to most sensations. We are scarcely war- ranted, however, in asserting that every sensation, as such, possesses some tone of feeling. 1 The question whether every sensation has some feeling must be distinguished from the question whether every feeling is of either painful or pleasurable tone. The tone of the feeling of sensations is the agreeable or disagreeable affection of consciousness which they often carry, as inseparably connected with them. The particular tone belonging to any sensation is, to a large extent, dependent on its intensity. The laws of this dependence have been ingeniously conjectured by Wundt. 2 Sensations of mod- erate intensity that is, of intensity below the point at which the minimum of painful feeling begins are usually pleasurable. The feeling of pain rises in intensity, from the point where it begins, as the intensity of the stimulus increases. The curves which represent the increase of feeling and the increase of sensation by no means correspond. It is assumed by Wundt that the maximum point of pleasure lies about the so-called "cardinal value " of the sensation, 1 As Wundt does, for example, Physiolog. Psychologie, i., p. 465. 2 Physiolog. Psychologie, i. , p. 469 ; comp. p. 360. TONE DEPENDENT ON INTENSITY. 515 or place where the sensation ceases to increase in simple proportion to the strength of the stimulus. The amount of pleasurable feeling is also dependent on the element of time. It is thought to reach a maximum at about the point where the strength of sensation is the most favorable for accurate discernment of the objective stimulus. / As to the dependence of the tone of feeling belonging to a sen- sation upon the quality of the latter, it has been held ' that no sen- sation is absolutely pleasant or unpleasant irrespective of its in- tensity. I Even then, however, it would have to be admitted that qualitatively different sensations differ greatly in the amount which is consistent with an agreeable tone of feeling. It is, of course, with regard to the organic sensations, and the special sensations of touch, smell, and taste, that the relation between tone of feeling and the quality of sensation is most apparent. Doubtless large al- lowance must be made in all cases for individual peculiarities of organism, association, etc. Probably, also, the disagreeable tone of feeling which almost universally attaches itself to certain qualities of sensation, however moderate or unobtrusive their intensity, is largely explicable on the principle of heredity. But, taking matters as they stand in present experience, it is impossible to maintain that the tone of feeling is not directly dependent on the quality of sensation. This is a question upon which only consciousness can pronounce. All degrees of some tastes and smells are disagreeable to most persons. Bitter is a distinctive species of the quality of gustatory sensations ; but the pleasure which some persons have in greater or less degrees of it is, as a rule, acquired. It is true that some substances, whose odor in large quantity is disagreeable, become tolerable, or even pleasant, when the smell from them is faint. But this faint smell is not the same, but a distinctly differ- ent quality ; oftentimes it could not be immediately recognized as coming from the same substance as that which emitted the strong odor. Discordant sounds are, in all degrees of intensity, naturally unpleasant ; and so most witnesses would pronounce certain com- plex sensations of the skin (as of creeping, prickling, etc.). 16. Characteristic mixtures of feeling some of them scarcely describable seem to be attached inseparably to different kinds of sensations. This is obvious when we consider the marked difference in the way we are affected by major and minor chords, by succes- sive tones having different musical intervals (for example, the di- minished third, etc.), and by the characteristic clangs of different musical instruments. Writers upon this part of musical theory may disagree as to the precise significance of the violin, clarinet, 1 So Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, i., p. 470. 516 HIGHER FORMS OF FEELING. cornet, or hautboy, with respect to the tone of feeling belonging to each ; but they can scarcely deny the fact of a marked difference. Goethe * called attention to the change in spiritual tone, as it were, which harmonizes w r ith what the eye sees when looking upon the world through different-colored glasses. Here, again, the precise equivalent, or value, in terms of feeling, which the different color- tones possess, may be a matter of dispute ; but the fact that the tones of feeling change with the color-tones is beyond dispute. That feelings of soberness or gloom go with black, of excitement with red, of cheerfulness with light green, of cool quiet with dark blue, of intense sensuous pleasure with saturated purple, would probably be admitted by most persons. Fewer would agree to de- scribing the tone of feeling belonging to dark yellow or spectral orange as one of " suppressed excitement," or to brown as one of " perfectly neutral mood." 2 17. The character of the disagreeable or painful feeling belong- ing to different classes of sensations also differs with respect to the nature of its attachment to a recognized physical basis. Unhar- monious colors produce in us a feeling of mild dissatisfaction, which appears as almost wholly of a spiritual kind. Discordant tones cause more of physical suffering ; and disagreeable smells or tastes create a widespread sense of organic discomfort. Pains in the skin and interior organs, however, may take a character of intense bodily anguish, which is distinctive of no other qualities of sensation, and which is capable of submerging all sensation, as such, in a flood of painful feeling. 3 18. The tone of sensuous feeling is also dependent upon the total condition of consciousness as determined by attention, mental habit, association of the feelings among themselves and with the ideas, control of the will, etc. Such feeling is, therefore, largely a secondary element of experience, which arises through certain ac- quired effects of the sensations as connected with previous activities of the mind. But concerning the physical basis of the feelings, in this aspect of them, we know nothing whatever ; and the subject is not as yet one with which physiological psychology can success- fully deal. 19. The consideration of the affections and the emotions, or passions, involves at least three important particulars : (1) The characteristic feeling which distinguishes each ; (2) its relations to the train of ideas, and the changes induced by it in the ideas ; (3) 1 Farbenlehre, 763. 'Comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, i., p. 477. 3 Comp. Lotze, Outlines of Psychology, p. 75 f . BODILY BASIS OF THE EMOTIONS. 517 the relations to the different bodily organs, and the reflex effect of the changes in these organs upon both the feelings and the ideas. Each of the various affections or passions is characterized by a peculiar feeling, whose tone is either agreeable or painful, whose intensity admits of various degrees, and whose content is determined by the mental representations to which it has become attached. Each may be considered as having its rise, psychologically, in spme_ form of blind, instinctive impulse that needs to be connected with a mental image of the object which experience has related to it as corresponding to the impulse. The germ of the impulse is the natural susceptibility of having desire awakened by an appropri- ate stimulus, and the capacity of forming by experience the idea which corresponds to, or gratifies, the impulse. 1 .Impulses may be describexL 4is. of two kinds craving, or attraction, and repulsion. When the feeling, whuj-iji.a rr|erf> impulse ia blind with respect to tne object of gratiticaTionTbecomes connected in experience with appropriate presentations of sense or mental pictures, the basis for an affection or passion has been laid. Thus the germ of anger and hate is found in that instinctive impulse of repulsion which is pro- duced by all unpleasanj; resistance of effort, or painful excitement of the nervous system.' Sudden and intense irritations as the striking of one's hand against the table, the slamming of a door in one's ear tend to arouse the feeling of resentment. The affection of the child for the mother ultimately becomes far more than the feeling of comfort it has in her arms or at her breast ; but the former is cradled and nursed in the latter. By varied associations, impulses of attraction or of repulsion become developed into a great variety of affections, emotions, and passions, characteristic of the different manifold relations in which the sentient soul finds it- self standing toward things and persons. 20; All emotional forms of feeling are accompanied by abrupt and marked changes in the character and time-course of the mental train. Such changes may be regarded as standing in the relation both of cause and of effect to these feelings. Some impression with which strong feeling has become associated is made upon the mind ; the result is a transitory interruption of the mental equi- poise. This constitutes in part the justification for the saying that from mere feeling to affection is a " leap." 2 As a rule, the effect of any sudden and surprising impression perception of some object of sense, or remembered image is to start the flow of emotion. Thus anger, fear, desire, avarice, take men " off their guard;" the 1 Comp. Wnndt, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., p. 33 f. 2 Comp. Nalilowsky, Das Gefiihlsleben, etc., Einleitung. 518 HIGHER FORMS OF FEELING. feelings of such kind that are started by a given mental impression themselves produce a confusion of the mental train. But, on the other hand, this very disturbance of the mental train is itself pro- ductive of a new phase of feeling, such as is associated with the particular ideas that in confused and hurried throngs rush into consciousness, as well as with the general state of consciousness considered as one of haste and confusion. The physical basis of this state is laid in the extraordinary condition of excitation that exists within the central organs the ideo- and sensory-motor cen- tres of the cerebral hemispheres. 21. But the wonderful, characteristic effect which these forms of feeling produce upon certain of the vital organs is the most noteworthy peculiarity of all affections, emotions, and passions. Upon this point science has far less than we could wish of informa- tion reaching beyond the observations of ordinary experience. Of such information, perhaps the most important concerns the influ- ence exerted through many groups of muscles, from the central organs, upon the vaso-motor system. VThe effect of shame, fear, or anger, for example, upon the circulation of the blood is matter of common remark. \ But some grow pale and others red, when angry. In 1854, R. Wagner investigated the effect of fear upon the heart of a rabbit. A blow on the table near the animal was found to cause its heart to stand still a short time, and then resume beating with accelerated frequency of stroke. Subsequent investigations have made obvious the general effect of emotion upon the curve in- dicating the blood-pressure. The effect produced upon the pulse of a dog by hearing the sudden cry of another dog depends for its character upon whether the vagus nerves are cut or not ; but even after their severance a marked effect of this kind is still manifest. 1 The great influence of these forms of feeling upon all the action of the capillary vessels, upon the secretions, etc., and upon the respira- tion to petard, or accelerate, or make it irregular, is of the same order. (That care and anxiety disturb nutrition, that pain and sor- row cause the tears to flow, that fear and love and anger act upon the abdominal organs, is generally recognized. The effect is some- times seen in suddenly innervating, and sometimes in depressing, one or more of the bodily organs ; or in both innervating and then depressing them, in certain well-recognized cases. On the basis of such facts, Kant suggested a division of the affections into " sthenic " and " asthenic." But many forms of feeling, as they run their 1 This subject has been investigated by Conty and Charpentier, by Cyon, Heidenhain, and others; comp. Exner, in Hermann's Handb. d. PhysioL, II., ii, p. 289 f. BODILY BASIS OF THE EMOTIONS. 519 course, become by turns sthenic and asthenic. Strong emotions or passions of all kinds tend to destroy the nervous mechanism ; " the sthenic kill by apoplexy, the asthenic by laming the heart." l Un- usual tension or relaxation of certain groups of muscles characterizes all these forms of feeling. N The marked effect which certain feelings have upon particular organs of the body is complemented by the fact that such organic effect has in turn a marked effect upon the feelings. The organic dis- turbances advance step by step to form the physical basis of a rising tide of emotion, and then fall off with equal pace as the tide of emo- tion subsides. The organic changes are not merely an expression of the mental ; they are its material cause and support. Professor James has emphasized these facts with great skill and in an inter- esting way. 2 The effect upon the emotions and passions of putting the muscles or other organs of the body into certain conditions, which is so remarkable in all cases of hypnotism, is also undoubted in what we ordinarily consider normal states of body and mind. "What kind of an emotion of fear would be left, if the feelings nei- ther of quickened heart-beats nor of shallow breathing, neither of trembling lips nor of weakened limbs, neither of goose-flesh nor of visceral stirrings, were present, it is quite impossible to think. Can one fancy the state of rage and picture no ebullition of it in the chest, no flushing of the face, no dilatation of the nostrils, no clinching of the teeth, no impulse to vigorous action, but in their stead limp muscles, calm breathing, and a placid face ? " In view ' 1 of the foregoing facts, Professor James propounds the thesis, that / the " bodily changes follow directly the perception of the exciting / fact, and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur is the emotion." s To neglect, however, that element of feeling in eveiy emotion which is immediately attached to certain perceptions and ideas would be quite as faulty as to neglect the elements which are only reflexly blended with the complex of feeling on account of the condi- tion into which the bodily organs are thrown. The relation between perception and feeling as a psychological fact is as certain and im- mediate as any relation can be. What the physiological basis for this connection is we do not know ; but there is every reason to suppose that it is, at the same time, direct and of the nature of re- ciprocal influence between the nervous elements and areas of the 1 Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 330. 2 Mind, 1884, IX., p. 1881 3 But since its author seems scarcely to have taken this thesis seriously, it may be thought superfluous even to object in brief to it (see p. 205). 520 HIGHER FORMS OF FEELING. cerebral centres ; as well as indirect, through disturbances pro- duced by perceptions and ideas within the remote bodily organs. The influence of perception upon the feelings in the form of strong emotion is partly, but not wholly, through the skin, muscles, blood- vessels, organs of respiration, and viscera. At the same time the characteristic tone which strong emotions have is largely colored by the sensuous and common feelings occasioned by the disturbance of the organs. When even the feelings called aesthetic, or intellect- ual, or ethical and religious, are vehemently aroused, an ''emo- tional " equality is imparted to them from the same source. 22. By mental " moods " is ordinarily understood those collec- tive conditions of the mind which are characterized by some funda- mental tone, but without any special feelings accompanied by clear consciousness of their inducing causes. The principal elements that enter into such moods consist of ill-localized sensations arising from the internal organs especially due, perhaps, to disturbed or de- pressed cerebral function ' and a throng of half -reproduced feel- ings and ideas, or of vague single feelings, such as undefined fore- boding, anxiety, fear, etc. Since these elements belong to the some- what permanent equipment of the mind (at least until a marked and lasting change in cerebral condition and the train of ideas is brought about), their prevalent tone is characteristic of different persons ; whereas the emotions and passions run their course quickly, and give a color to the personality rather by the sudden- ness and frequency with which this kind or that, respectively, is present in consciousness. But mental moods also may be charac- terized by emotions or affections of a low and lingering tone pale and faded specimens of the type, as it were. 23. Of all the so-called " higher feelings " (aesthetic, intellectual, ethical, religious), it is only certain elementary forms\of aesthetic feeling concerning whose peculiar physical basis we have any as- sured information. All these feelings, however, when they reach a certain degree of intensity, tend to assume an emotional character. They then come in part under the considerations which have already been urged as applying to the emotions in general. A large portion of the strong feelings of admiration for scientific objects, discoveries, laws, and personalities, or of religious fervor, aspiration, and devotion, or depression, is reflex ; it rests upon the physical basis of effects that are produced in the muscles and vital organs especially the organs of secretion, respiration, and circulation. But these facts do not explain or annul the other class of facts, which leads the judicious investigator also to emphasize the spiritual origin of such feelings 1 Comp. Strieker, Studien iiber d. Bewusstseiu, p. 63. FEELING OF HARMONY AND RHYTHM. 521 considered as complex reactions of the mind in view of the presence in consciousness of certain classes of ideas. So far as such spiritual reactions by way of feeling have any even conjectural physical basis peculiar to them, this basis must be sought for in the central organs of the nervous system. How far such a basis really exists, and in what it consists, we have as yet scarcely a right to imagine so complete is our ignorance. 24( The aesthetic feelings arise and develop chiefly in connec- tion with presentations of sense, or with the remembered or created mental images that represent objects of sense. ^ In their elementary form, therefore, they plainly have a physiological side which admits of scientific treatment although they have received such treatment far less than could be wished. Many interesting facts and certain partial generalizations called laws having most application to the lower classes of pleasurable feelings through the organs of smell, taste, and the skin, when viewed in the light of the hypothesis of evolution are given in the work of Grant Allen on " Physiological Esthetics." ' But even the most elementary aesthetic feelings can- not be considered as on a par with the sensuous feelings, or as mere aggregates of such feelings. 2 The tone of feeling which characterizes the sensations furnishes a material, as it were, for genuinely aesthetic feeling ; but the latter always implies also the working of certain in- tellectual laws, and a union of the simple feelings of sensation under time-form and space-form. ^Esthetic feelings, then, may be said to spring from the manner of the combination of sensuous feelings ; time and space furnish the framework in which they are arranged. Hearing is the principal sense for combining sensuous feelings so as to produce aesthetic feelings under time-form, and sight under space-form. The development of even the elementary but genuine cesthetic feelings by other senses than the eye and ear is extreme- ly limited. The agreeable and disagreeable feelings which come through sensations of smell, taste, and touch are for the most part sensuous, rather than strictly aesthetic. Hearing, as pre-eminently the time-sense, has two forms of aes- thetic feeling harmony and rhythm. The nature of the complex sensations which produce the feeling of consonance and dissonance has already been discussed. Harmony is determined by the co- incidence of certain partial tones belonging to different clangs si- multaneously sounded. The feeling of harmony is colored by the peculiar way in which the combination of the clangs occurs. The principal difference of this sort is that which obtains beween major 1 See pp. 30 ff. 2 On this point, see Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 179 f. 522 HIGHER FORMS OF FEELING. chords and minor chords ; in the former the different clangs are perceived as firmly held together by the fundamental clang, while in the latter the coincident overtone performs the same office less obviously. The one is productive of agreeable aesthetic feeling satisfied ; the other of such feeling left unsatisfied a feeling of longing. When, then, the one form of feeling becomes very intense, it may involve the pain of over-excitement ; the other, when inten- sified, stirs a kind of agreeable pain of unrest. In musical time it is the periodic nature of the excitation, with a change in the individ- ual presentations of sense, which produces the pleasurable aesthetic feeling. Two or three regularly recurring impressions, having the same or a different content of musical sound, are combined into a series ; certain members among the whole number are then ac- centuated, in order to form the different series that constitute the various kinds of musical time. All musical time, fundamentally considered as respects its rhythm, is either two-time or three-time. The difference in the feelings which respond to these two classes of musical rhythm is obvious in a pronounced form, in the funeral march, on the one hand, and the waltz, on the other. In general, it is the harmony of music which gives direction to its feeling, and the rhythm which determines the rise and fall of feeling. Thus loaves of different kinds of feeling are made by music to pass over the soul. 1 The elementary aesthetic feelings which come through sight lead to the consideration of the aesthetic effect of visual form. Such ef- fect can be considered only very imperfectly from the physiological point of view. In one important particular, however, pleasurable aesthetic feeling is directly dependent upon the combination of the sensations, with their accompanying tone of feeling, under the laws of the mechanism of vision with both eyes in motion. Beautiful form is determined by the course of the limiting lines ; and limit- ing lines, in order to have the effect of arousing agreeable aesthetic feeling, must accommodate themselves to the physiological and psy- cho-physical necessities of the eye when in motion. These neces- sities thus determine both the direction and the extent of the limit- ing lines. Lines of slight curvature, not too far continued in one direction, best comply with such necessities. Lines of very sharp curvature, or lines continued too long in one direction, do not pro- duce a pleasing aesthetic effect. So also must the main lines of a building lie in horizontal or vertical directions, preferably in the 1 For a treatment of aesthetic feeling in music, comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., pp. 180 ff. THE GOLDEN DIAMETEK. 523 former direction. But long oblique lines for example, from a lower right-band to an upper left-hand corner of a building are scarcely tolerable. The ease with which the eye sweeps the lines, in order to make that synthesis of successive similar presentations of sense in which every perception of a line consists, is plainly a determining factor in all these cases. The aesthetic effect of visual form is also determined by the way in which the form is constructed, through repeating similar or un- like simple shapes and combining them into a totality. By this means a feeling of pleasure akin to the feeling of musical rhythm is excited by the successive impressions which occur periodically as the eye, with a nearly uniform movement, sweeps the entire field. In horizontal directions, the law for the arrangement of the parts is that of symmetry of the simple parts ; in vertical, rather the law of asymmetry. Certain proportions between the connected parts, and between the whole and the parts, are favorable to the develop- ment of aesthetic feeling. The rule, that the whole of a presentation of sight shall be to the larger part as the larger part is to the small- er part, has been called " the golden diameter " (x + 1 : x : : x : 1) ; since the proportion thus determined has been supposed to be par- ticularly favorable to pleasurable aesthetic feeling. Ease of the mental apprehension with which the relations in proportion of the different parts are presented is favorable to agreeable aesthetic feel- ing. 25. But all the foregoing rules, and all others similar, are appli- cable to the aesthetic feelings of form rather as coming under the general class of intellectual feelings. That change in degree or kind of activity, recognition of similarity or contrast, and mental appre- hension of a law or principle as expressed in the presentations of sense, determine the agreeable character of our intellectual feel- ings, is recognized by psychologists ' generally ; but as to the physical basis of mental facts of this order we are almost completely ignorant. It is not unlikely, however, that the effects of monotony and change upon the feelings of an intellectual order are connected with the same law of the exhaustion of the nervous elements as ap- plied to the cerebral areas which we know to hold good in other parts of the nervous system. 26. The only other class of feelings which admit of considera- tion from the physiological point of view is the so-called "feelings of effort, or of innervation." These feelings are especially con- nected with all the motions of the body considered as furnishing 1 See the judicious remarks of Sully, Outlines of Psychology, pp. 457 ff. New York, 1884. 524 HIGHER FORMS OF FEELING. information concerning its position and the condition of tension or strain to which its parts are subject ; as well as furnishing, through revived mental images of such feelings, the means for reproducing voluntarily the required definite modes of motion. Such feelings also have a great psychological interest on account of their obvious connection with the development and consciousness of acts of will. The dispute as to whether they are of central or peripheral origin, and as to that in which their precise nature consists, has already been alluded to (pp. 344 and 415). That we have a ' ' feeling of effort " is a fact, as says Professor James, 1 "consecrated by the institution of the word effort, and its synonyms exertion, striving, straining." The nervous process which occasions this feeling the great physiologist Miiller ' 2 considered to be purely central, and to consist in the discharge from a motor centre into the motor nerves. This view has since been widely adopted by physiologists ; it has also been used especially by Bain and Wundt as an essential factor in a theory of sense-perception, as of chief importance in accounting for our experience of solid re- sisting objects of sense and of whatever belongs to the inertia of matter in general. On the contrary, it has been maintained that the feeling of effort, over and above what is purely " moral" (as in the effort to remember to make a decision, etc.), is a complex of afferent sensations " coming from the tense muscles, the strained ligaments, squeezed joints, fixed chest, closed ' glottis, contracted brow, clinched jaws, 3 etc." Of the two views above mentioned, the latter has by far the most in its favor. The argument from the consciousness of effort which we may have when we intensely make believe use any limb, but do not actually move it (as, for example, the pulling of a trigger with the forefinger of an extended hand), has been answered by Ferrier. 4 This observer calls attention to the fact that the feeling of effort in such cases is due to keeping the glottis tightly closed, and actively contracting the respiratory muscles. If we try, how- ever, to make believe exert ourselves without actually contract- ing the muscles of the limbs, and at the same time keep breathing regularly, we shall not experience the slightest trace of the feeling of effort, no matter how hard we fay. This feeling, then, when the glottis is closed and the respiratory muscles are tense, is due to centripetal impressions coming from the parts thus innervated. The argument from the feelings of effort which determine our 1 The Feeling of Effort, Anniversary Memoirs of the Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist., 1880, last monograph. 2 Physiologic d. Menschen, II., p. 500. 3 See James, Feeling of Effort, p. 4. * The Functions of the Brain, p. 222 f . THE FEELING OF EFFORT. 525 localization of objects has been presented in the most convincing way possible by Helmholtz and Wundt, as applied to the case of partial paralysis of the external rectus of one eye. Inasmuch as the patient feels (so von Graefe ' showed) that he has moved his lame eye much farther than he really has, the inference is drawn that this exaggerated feeling of effort must originate in central motor impulses which have followed upon the fiat of the will. This argument, however, neglects to notice what goes on in the other and sound eye. Since this eye, unlike the lame one, continues its motion until the limit of motion and its corresponding condition of peripheral strain is reached ; and since, as Hering 2 has shown (comp. what has already been said, p. 439 f .), both eyes are innervated by one common act, and their motor apparatus is to be regarded as functioning as one organ the feeling of effort is probably due to afferent sensory impulses occasioned by the condition of the sound eye as well as of the other eye. 3 Moreover, the more critically we examine those cases which occasionally occur, where, on account of paralysis causing anaesthesia, the sense of position of the limbs is impaired or lost, the more conclusive does the evidence appear against the theory that the feeling of effort is of purely central ori- gin. For, in general, it seems that, while the power of voluntary motion remains unimpaired, if the sensations which have a pe- ripheral origin are impaired or lost, the various feelings of effort connected with the accomplishment of a given amount of motion, or with the act of holding any member of the body against the pull of gravity, are disturbed or disappear. 4 As far as the evidence re- garding this obscure subject reaches at present, the feeling of effort 1 Handb. d. gesammten Augenheilkunde, VI., p. 18 f. 9 See Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., III., i., pp. 512 f. and 520 f. 3 See James, Feeling of Effort, p. 10 f. 4 See a recent paper on " Le Sens musculaire et les Sensations musculaires,'' by E. Gley, in the Revue Philosophique, 1885, pp. 601 ff. In this paper the results of the investigations of M. Maguin, conducted upon paralytics in the Hopital de la Pitie (Comptes rendus, Mars 1884, i.), are appealed to as con- firmatory of the view that the stretching and rubbing of skin, ligaments, joints, etc., enter into our so-called feelings of effort. M. Demeaux has reported the case of a woman who could move her limbs, but could not tell whether they were moved, or in what direction, or how far. No fewer than three similar cases were reported by French physicians in the year 1885. The same view of the complex peripheral origin of the feeling of effort seems also to be fa- vored by the experiments of M. Bloch, who tried placing his hands symmet- rically on a screen with two leaves covered with paper, divided into small squares, under the guidance of the so-called muscular sense. The testimony of persons who have lost their limbs, as to whether they can produce any feel- ing of effort by the fiat of will to move the lost member, is conflicting. In all 526 MATURE OF THE BODILY MOTIONS. must be held to be complex, and so is akin to other forms of com- mon feeling ; its constituent elements are the various obscurely lo- calized sensations, with their characteristic tones of feeling, which arise in the condition of skin, muscles, ligaments, joints, etc. 27. The feeling of effort is closely connected in experience with the changing positions of the members of the body, and its consideration therefore fitly introduces that of the bodily motions. As concerns their relation to the phenomena of mind, these motions may be divided into two great classes ' namely, such as are not demonstrable connected with antecedent changes in the states of consciousness, and such as, in addition to their physical condi- tions and causes, require that their explanation should take account also of preceding states of consciousness. The former are to be regarded purely as activities of the physical mechanism, 2 and are either automatic or reflex. Automatic motions are such as, with- out any corresponding idea or fiat of will, originate from inner excitations of the central nervous system ; the reflex are those in which the central excitations resulting in motion are traceable to the action of sensory n'erves which have been peripherally excited. It is extremely difficult to distinguish between automatic and reflex motions, and scarcely less so to distinguish between the automatic and the impulsive. Indeed, while it is true, on the one hand, that reflex and centrally co-ordinated movements form the basis upon which all our developed life of voluntary motion takes place, it is also true, on the other hand, that the more complex co-ordinated movements are themselves originally voluntary motions which have, as it were, become habitual and so dropped out of consciousness into a statical and mechanical way of taking place. The sensations and ideas of motions may then be said to tend constantly in two directions either toward consciousness or out of it. It is by means of these processes in two directions that all our learning of complicated movements of the body, of feats of dexterity and skill learning to handle tools, to play on musical instruments, etc. takes place. The interest which psychology has in the automatic such cases, however, it is probable that the alleged feeling of effort is to be looked for in the actual condition of strain into which some existing part of the body is thrown especially the apparatus of respiration (see Bastian, British Med. Journal, 1869, p. 461). 1 Comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii., p. 400 f . ; and Lotze, Medicin. Psychologie, p. 286 f. 2 The mechanism of the bodily motions has already been treated at length : for the nerve-muscle machine, see pp. 104 ff. ; for reflex motion, see pp. 132 ff.; for automatic motion, see pp. 147 ff. ; for the sensory-motor areas of the cere- brum, see p. 267 ff. BASIS OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT. 527 and reflex motions is chiefly on account of their relations to motions which are actually preceded by conscious ideation and volition. 28. Such motions of the body as require us to take account of antecedent or accompanying states of consciousness, in addition to the connections of the physical mechanism, are either impulsive or voluntary. But this distinction is one which admits of such a great variety of degrees shading into each other, that, although it is valid and necessary in principle, it cannot be carried through in practice with any considerable precision. By an impulsive motion we understand a motion which, without a conscious fiat of will, fol- lows upon certain ideas and excited states of feeling. The motif of the impulsive movement lies, then, in some form of feeling that determines will one way without any proper choice. If we speak of such motions as volitional or voluntary, it must be understood that we are referring to activities of will of a lower order, psycho- logically considered, than those which come into play in all cases of conscious choice. Impulsive motions are, in general, more quickly accomplished than are voluntary motions; because the reaction- time is shortened through will-time proper having been dropped out (comp. chap. VIII., 19 f.). 29. All voluntary movement has its basis laid, so to speak, in impulsive movement, and in the reactionary effect which the latter has upon the conditions of reflex and automatic bodily activities. As laid in this basis, voluntary motions imply a development of in- telligence and will. The infant finds itself equipped with a bod- ily mechanism which, under the influence of external and internal stimuli, is kept excited to unceasing activity of the peripheral mem- bers. This activity results in certain sensations and feelings of effort, in the manner previously described. The tone of these states of consciousness is one of either pleasure or discomfort, under those laws of relation between the nervous mechanism and conscious feeling which can be only imperfectly stated ; and which, when most perfectly stated, can only be accepted as ultimate matters of fact. By nature the nervous mechanism is so arranged that certain other bodily motions of peripheral origin are started on occasion of the pleasant or painful feeling, and these motions are adapted to enhance the feeling if pleasant and to relieve it if painful. The feelings thus become further connected with the ideas of the mo- tions that modify them ; yet the mechanism of the motions is not to be regarded as originally dependent upon the ideas, but rather as originated in connection with the feelings of pleasure or discom- fort and naturally adapted to secure an increase of the one or a diminution of the other. 528 NATURE OF THE BODILY MOTIONS. The voluntary movements of the body, accordingly, presuppose the impulsive, and yet they reach far back into the obscurity of the earlier development of consciousness. Strictly speaking, they imply the presence in consciousness of two or more different or conflict- ing ideas of motion, one of which rather than the others is realized as a sequence of an act of conscious choice. They imply, then as has already been said a considerable development of the men- tal activities of ideation and volition. Moreover, those movements which are ordinarily called voluntary are really so only with respect to certain of their elements ; they all also contain elements which must be classed as reflex, centrally co-ordinated, and impulsive. The term " voluntary " fitly lays the emphasis upon the conscious act of choice ; and this, in turn, implies ideas of various possible forms of bodily motion gained by previous experience with the correlated states of conscious feeling and conditions of the body as giving rise to or modifying these states. The voluntary motions, therefore, constitute the highest class of motions, both because their conditions include all those which be- long to the other classes, and other conditions besides, and also because of their more direct connection with the development of certain mental phenomena of supreme psychological interest and im- portance. To move any part of the body voluntarily requires the fol- lowing particulars : (1) The possession of an educated reflex-motor mechanism, under the control of those higher cerebral centres which are most immediately connected with the phenomena of conscious- ness ; (2) certain motifs in the form of conscious feelings that have a tone of pleasure or pain, and so impel the mind to secure such bodily conditions as will continue or increase the one and discon- tinue or diminish the other ; (3) ideas of motions and positions of the bodily members, which previous experience has taught us an- swer more or less perfectly to the motifs of conscious feeling ; (4) a conscious fiat of will, settling the question, as it were, which of these ideas shall be realized in the motions achieved and positions attained by these members ; (5) a central nervous mechanism, which serves as the organ of relation between this act of will and the discharge of the requisite motor impulses along their nerve-tracts to the groups of muscles peripherally situated. As to the first and second of the foregoing particulars, nothing further need be said ; and as to the definite nature of the physical basis which underlies the connection of ideas of motion, fiat of will adopting one idea, and the starting outward of the right motor im- pulses, our ignorance is almost complete. It is more than probable that we cannot will the movement of muscles, of the results of whose WILL AS A PSYCHICAL ACTIVITY. 529 actual movement in the induced motion of the limbs we have ac- quired no idea from previous experience. The mental images of the various feelings of motion and position which have been acquired in the past are our guides in realizing again the same motions and positions of the limbs. To say I will, refers to the future. But we can never " will" motion in general motion, that is, of no partic- ular members of the body, and without specific quality, direction, and velocity of the motion. That certain nervous processes in the central organs form a physical basis for the mental phenomena of ideation and fiat of will there is sufficient ground for believing. The phenomena of reaction-time show that interrelated cerebral activities of more and more complicated sort are implied in the in- creased time required for completing the mental actions of repre- sentation and choice between two members of an alternative. It would be a great mistake, however, to regard the mind as having before it the cerebral machinery, all nicely laid out, together with the acquired art of selecting and touching the right nervous ele- ments in order to produce the desired motion, as a skilful player of the piano handles his key-board. The mind has no native or ac- quired knowledge of the different ideo-motor areas of the cerebrum. Even less can we regard the mind, acting under the form of energy of will, as bringing some stress to bear upon the right centres of the brain, and thus setting them in motion by laying its own hand to them, as it were. The activity of which we are directly con- scious under the term " to will " is a purely psychical activity ; it is marked by no transition of force from the spiritual realm to the material molecules of the nervous structure. The feeling of effort, which seems to us to accompany the active putting-forth of will, is itself a resultant of mixed sensations that have a peripheral origin. The whole description of such transactions of voluntary motion as are constantly occurring for example, when we rise to close the win- dow, take the pen in hand to write, etc. is as follows : We desire to have something done ; mental images of the bodily motions and positions involved in this doing arise in the mind ; the fiat of will goes forth adopting one of them, and willing it, as we say ; an or- der of nature which has correlated this fiat with certain cerebral changes, but of which we know nothing whatever directly, and little through the most searching investigations of science, runs its course, and the transaction which we have ideated and willed takes place.' The mind can represent the ideas in consciousness, and issue the fiat of will ; it can do nothing more. Science can only conjecture at 1 This view of the subject has been repeatedly enforced by Lotze ; see, espe- cially, the Microcosmus, i., pp. 283 ff. Edinburgh, 1885. 34 530 NATURE OF BODILY MOTIONS. present what then takes place. It is to its advancing theory of nerve-physiology, 1 and of the localization of cerebral function, 3 that we must look for more light on the question Wliat happens in the brain when the fiat of will issues in consciousness f 30. Reflection on the foregoing principles makes it obvious that the different concrete motions of ordinary experience cannot be assigned with confidence to this or that class exclusively. In the life of the infant we can trace a general progress from an almost exclusive predominance of reflex and automatic motions, through the impulsive, to more and more of the voluntary. But even in the infant's case no hard and fixed lines can be drawn be- tween the various classes of motions. It is impossible to say how much of the constant movement of its legs and arms is reflex, how much automatic. It is also doubtful how far and how long the winking of the eyes, the grimaces of face accompanying the stimu- lating of the tongue, the starting at sound, etc., are reflex rather than impulsive. The same thing is true of its earlier cryings, mi- metic and imitative movements, and various ways of thrusting out and drawing in its limbs in a purposeful way. Nor can the earlier voluntary motions be confidently distinguished from the impulsive. This line of inquiry is especially interesting with respect to the beginnings of articulate speech. A tolerably regular transition from the sounds in which the earliest emotions express themselves to the deliberate formation of words and sentences makes it impos- sible to tell precisely when the child assumes control of its organs of speech. But our difficulties with the unclassifiable phenomena of infantile life do not seem so strange when we reflect upon the fact that the complicated bodily motions of adult life partake at one and the same time of all the four above-mentioned classes ; and that precisely the same motions may pass rapidly out of one class into another. The person, for example, who is balancing with a pole on a tight-rope, or dancing to music, is involved at once in motions which correspond to all four of these principal classes ; and a quick change in circumstances may make any one of the four more prominent than another. So perfectly may the nervous mechanism be trained to its work that it may continue to play the violin in an orchestra after the player has lost consciousness. Yet the rise and fall of feeling usually serves as a guide to the artist, so that impulsively his bowing draws nearer the bridge in the cres- cendo, and nearer the key-board in the diminuendo, passages. If he plays false or out of time, the sight of the leader's baton, or his own 1 Comp. Part I., chaps. III. and VII. 2 Comp. Part II., chaps. I. and II. MOTION AS EXPRESSIVE OF FEELING. 531 sensations, may decide him to the fiat of will which changes the spacing with the left hand or the bowing with the right arm. 31. The origin and nature of those motions of the body that are specifically expressive of certain ideas and feelings constitutes one of the most interesting fields of inquiry. It is a field, however, in which comparative psychology, by dealing with the facts of ani- mal life under the theory of evolution, is particularly successful ; whereas Physiological Psychology, strictly speaking, has little to communicate. This little has been summarized by Wundt ' under three general statements or principles namely, the principle of the direct alteration of innervation, the principle of the association of analogous sensations, and the principle of the relation of motion to the presentations of sense. Under the principle of the direct alteration of innervation are placed those facts which show that strong emotions exercise an immediate reaction on the central parts of motor innervation in such a way that many groups of muscles are lamed at once, and others are excited to tense action followed by ex- haustion. Hence the tremblings of limbs and organs of speech, the changes in the blood-vessels and capillaries connected with secre- tion, the paling of fear, the reddening of anger and shame, the erect hairs under the influence of terror, etc. The principle of the association of analogous sensations emphasizes such facts as imply that sensations having a common tone of feeling are most easily combined, and then operate mutually to strengthen each other. Under this principle come the mimetic movements of mouth and nose expressive of disgust or pleasant taste, the posturings of the tongue in connection with ideas of sweet or bitter, the expressive condition of the muscles due to certain sensations of the skin, etc. The consideration of the third principle that of the relation of motion to the presentations of sense brings before us the question of the origin of all the gestures and pantomimic action not account- ed for under the two foregoing principles. Gestures with eyes and head and limbs, indicative of extension and relations in space ; the arrangement of the muscles and skin of the countenance, and the motions of the eyes under the influence of care, expectation, and reflection ; the angles of the lines about the mouth and the open- ings of mouth and nostrils when weeping or laughing, etc., all be- long under this principle. But the physiology and psychology of the comic, the science of physiognomy, and of articulation in expres- sive speech, although properly coming in this connection, lead into descriptive anatomy and the theory of aesthetics much beyond the limits necessarily set to our investigation. 1 Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., chap. 20. CHAPTEE X. PHYSICAL BASIS OF THE HIGHEK FACULTIES. 1. 'AN ardent advocate of "Psychology without a soul " affirms l that "the study of abstract concepts (time, number, etc.) falls out- side the province of physiological psychology, and has been made incidentally only." To be sure, this author has previously 2 antici- pated the time when the science of mind will succeed " in deter- mining the (physical) conditions of all mental action, of whatever sort, as well of pure thought as of perception and movement, "j will in brief be " entirely physiological. " It is not necessary to in- quire how these two sentences can be reconciled. But, undoubt- edly, at present the statement of fact is far better founded than the anticipation. It is not easy to predict how far psycho-physical science will be able to push its discoveries in the future ; or just where it will meet those insuperable barriers which surround all fields of human inquiry. It is perfectly safe, however, to affirm of all the phenomena of the so-called " higher faculties " of mind what M. Kibot says of the study of abstract concepts they still " fall outside the province of physiological psychology." Certain difficulties are so obviously intrinsic and essential to the very nat- ure of the facts with which this science attempts to deal when ap- proaching these faculties that we cannot see how they will ever be successfully met. 2. The foregoing conclusions apply most obviously to the for- mation of abstract concepts, the conducting of trains of reason- ing, the exercise of choice, and the activities of the creative imagi- nation in artistic production, scientific discovery, or mechanical invention. They apply only less obviously to the higher aesthetic, ethical, and religious feelings ; although we have already pointed out certain facts and laws which connect such feelings with a phys- ical basis. We are also almost as much at a loss how to be " sci- entific" (strictly speaking) in our treatment of the phenomena which suggest some kind of physical basis for the action of will See M. Ribot, German Psychology of To-day, p. 306. New York, 1886. y^tfri/i p 15 THE METHOD OF INQUIRY. 533 especially in the direction of attention for the apperception of objects of sense, and for the control of the train of ideas or the movement of the bodily organism. The same thing is true of the phenomena of memory, whether considered as involving retention merely or reproduction as well. All the attempts hitherto made to explain or deduce consciousness, either in general or in the par- ticular phase called self-consciousness, from cerebral functions and activities, have been quibbling and wholly unsatisfactory. Yet there are indubitable proofs of the dependence of consciousness for its existence and modes upon the cerebral centres. The inquiry after the physical basis of the mental phenomena usually classed as " higher " is, therefore, although peculiarly in- teresting, peculiarly unproductive of assured results. We may sus- pect that there exist in the nervous elements of the gray matter of the cerebral hemispheres inherited and acquired peculiarities of molecular constitution and of dynamical combination, which, if we could only get at them, would throw a flood of light upon such mental phenomena. But after all, to speak soberly, we are obliged to admit that the very existence of such peculiarities is still almost wholly a matter of conjecture ; while the request for precise and verifiable information as to their nature, and as to the laws which connect them with undoubted facts of consciousness, can only be met by evasion, confession of ignorance, or poetizing and declama- tion under the garb of science. 1 Physiological Psychology has a right to its own hypotheses ; it has, however, no right to introduce myths about the genesis and marriage and "erethism" of nerve- cells, and speculation as to nerve-fibres dynamically inclined, into the domain of either physiological or psychological laws. 3. The only safe method of arriving at the few probable con- clusions attainable concerning the subject of this chapter is, accord- ingly, the following : The points of starting and the guides as to the way must, in nearly every case, be taken from introspective psy- chology. In studying the higher mental phenomena, physiological psychology is obliged almost wholly to adopt, as the only direct path open, the ?? cm-physiological method. Here, at any rate, we start from that which appears to us as terra firma. We know what it is to attend, to choose, to remember, and to reason in short, to be conscious in some of the many modes or phases of conscious- ness. Moreover, whatever may be said in disparagement of the 1 It is only by such terms as " poetizing" that we can truthfully characterize the greater part of what is said, for example, by M. Luys, in his work on The Brain and its Functions ; this, while admitting the skill and brilliancy with which the author treats his own interesting conjectures. 534 PHYSICAL BASIS OF VOLITION. " old psychology," it cannot fitly be denied that it has most thor- oughly and subtly analyzed the phenomena of judgment, memory, and choice, as these phenomena appear connected with each other in the flowing current of our conscious life. The result of such analysis has been secured in the laws of logic, of the association of ideas, etc., and in the various doctrines of the will and its relations to motive and conduct. In fact, all study of these mental phenom- ena from the physiological point of view is compelled to accept in some form the conclusions of a study of the same phenomena from the introspective point of view. For example, the reproduction of ideas under the so-called laws of association is a general fact of consciousness ; in the attempt to explain this fact according to psycho-physical causes we are obliged to rely upon the results reached by the introspective psychology. The application to men- tal phenomena of uncouth terms derived from the physical sciences such as " agglutination," " agglomeration," " cohesion," " organic phosphorescence," " histological catalepsy," etc. has simply the effect of repeating certain psychical facts and laws in a less appro- priate way, without adding an item of information regarding the *eal nature of their physiological basis. Ideas, or states and prod- ucts of consciousness, cannot speaking literally cohere, or be- come agglutinated or agglomerated ; and we need some better proof than mere declamation to show that these states and prod- ucts depend upon any physical processes resembling agglutina- tion, phosphorescence, or catalepsy of the nerve-cell. Physiological psychology is obliged, then, to accept certain conclusions of the psychology of self-consciousness ; otherwise it has no motif or guide in its investigation of the higher mental faculties. But while our conscious psychical experience of the higher men- tal activities is so far obvious as to make that side of the subject capable of scientific statement, our knowledge of the physiological processes connected with those activities is in precisely the oppo- site condition. Over and over again the confession has been forced from us that strictly speaking a scientific physiology of the cerebral hemispheres does not yet exist. We can only dimly con- jecture what takes place in the nerve-elements of the cortex of the cerebrum as the physical basis of conscious sensation and percep- tion. The molecular physics, or general nerve -physiology of the nerve-muscle machine the simple peripheral nerve with muscle attached is in a very unsatisfactory state. A science for the vast complex of nerve-cells and nerve-fibres which exists in the gray matter of the brain proper is at present scarcely a matter for even hopeful anticipation. Faint and doubtful guesses, more or less AUTOMATISM OF CENTRAL ORGANS. 535 intimately connected with general principles of molecular physics and physiology of the nervous system, are all that can appear in the name of such a science. But the very business of physiological psychology is to connect together under general laws the mental phenomena, on the one side, and the ascertained facts of physiol- ogy, on the other side. In this case, we are tolerably equipped with information as to the former ; we have little but un verifiable assumption to take the place of the latter. In attempting the in- quiry into the physical basis of the higher faculties (the physio- logical psychology of volition, memory, conception, etc.), no other course is open but to accept the facts of consciousness, and then speculate as to how they may, perhaps in part, be accounted for by a conjectural extension of certain physical and physiological facts to the cerebral hemispheres. This procedure certainly cannot be called "science;" it is, however, the only one open instead of a confession of complete ignorance. 4. The mental phenomena of the higher order, concerning whose physical basis conjecture is most plausibly supported by a number of related facts, may be divided into two great classes. One of these covers the phenomena of Will, in the forms of attentive per- ception and the effort determining the extent and character of the field of consciousness ; the other covers the phenomena of Memory, whether considered as the retention or the reproduction of ideas. Certain conjectures as to the physical basis of both these kinds of mental activities are in good degree warranted by the principles discussed in the foregoing chapters. The physiological basis (so far as such basis can be said to exist) for those mental phenomena which appear in consciousness as "acts of will " is laid, in general, in that power of automatism which is concentrated, so to speak, in the nerve-cells of the central organs. Automatism, or the power of originating motions which cannot be explained as due to external stimuli, is indeed in some sort a property of all living protoplasm ; but in that elaborate differentia- tion of structure and function which the human body exhibits, the nerve-cells of the central organs have absorbed this power and be- come distinctively automatic. To them chiefly does it belong to initiate within themselves the molecular changes which are neces- sary to keep the body, both as a whole and in its several parts, adjusted to the changes of its environment. It is sometimes said that " an amoeba has a will of its own." Our only right to speak in this manner is derived from the fact that many of its formal changes seem to arise from within, and are quite inexplicable under any known laws of merely reflex motion. If we raise the inquiry 536 PHYSICAL BASIS OF VOLITION. whether such automatic changes of its molecular structure are ac- companied by anything which corresponds to what we call conscious volition, it must be admitted that we are quite unable to answer such an inquiry. We can easily imagine the amoeba, however, to have a consciousness of an " act of will " as an accompaniment of each automatic change in the arrangement of its molecules. A large part of man's activity in the control of his bodily organism, we know, is unaccompanied by any conscious volition. Such un- conscious but purposeful activity belongs to the spinal cord and to the lower cerebral centres, which act both reflexly and automat- ically under the laws of acquired skill and of habit. In this way many even of our so-called voluntary movements really take place. But some sudden emergency as, for example, the sight of a threatening object, a change in the character of the soil on which the pedestrian treads, the parting of a rein in the rider's hand may call for a succession of distinct and intense acts of will. And, ordinarily, mild and rather obscure volitions connected with the movement of the body intermingle with the succession of sensa- tions and ideas which compose the principal material of con- sciousness. In all such cases as the foregoing we have reason to suppose that, either through external or internal stimuli (either through sensory impulses coming in along the centripetal nerve- tracts or as started by changed conditions of blood-supply), the nerve-cells of the cerebral hemispheres are called upon to exercise their peculiar functions. Such functions we may well believe are always both reflex and automatic ; that is to say, the nerve-commotions which issue from the cells are dependent for their intensity and charac- ter both upon the excitations coming to them from without and also upon their own internal molecular structure and condition especially as respects the blood-supply. Accordingly, it must be held that volitions, or acts of will in consciousness, do not have their physical basis in any special organ or area of the brain. There is no special organ of ivill. All the central organs have pre- eminently the property of automatism. But since, in the case of man at least, it is only on occasion of a certain kind and degree of activity of the cerebral hemispheres that what takes place in the nervous system has any corresponding expression in conscious- ness, the physical basis for acts of will in general is the automa- tism of these hemispheres in general. 5. An act of will, however, is always an act of some special kind. There can be no volition to motion in general, but only a volition defined and limited to the movement of certain limbs, or of the SIGNIFICANCE OF SPECIAL AREAS. 537 trunk including the limbs, with a certain direction and degree of motion. Thus also every act of will for the control of the mental train, or for the apperception of an object of sense, through con- centrated attention, is denned by some particular mental state or modification upon which it is directed. We have seen good reason to believe that certain areas of the cerebral cortex are especially connected with certain corresponding sensory-motor activities (comp. Chap. II. throughout). In the same areas, then, the physical basis is laid for those acts of will that are concerned with the corresponding activities. The acts of will which have to do with the movement of the upper and lower limbs, for example, im- ply the special activity of the cerebral areas on either side the Fissure of Rolando ; those acts of will that have to do with the movement of the organs used in articulate speech are especially re- lated to the areas lying about the lower part of the Fissure of Syl- vius the posterior third of the lower frontal convolution, etc. We have no sufficient ground for locating in one circumscribed spot the physical basis of such acts of voluntary attention as concern the different presentations of sense and the images of memory de- rived from them. The case is not as though the mind made a transit, as it were, from some special seat of intelligence and will, to contemplate with attention and pronounce upon the complicated sensory impressions which have arrived and been elaborated in the particular sensory areas ; or as though it travelled from adjacent parts to lay its grip upon the right motor areas when sensation or desire indicated to will that certain groups of muscles should be innervated. Whenever an act of mill takes place, then at the cerebral area which corresponds to the particular nature of the act (namely, the will to attend to this object of sense, or to start in motion that limb) the particular molecular changes arise in the nerve-cells which are correlated with such mode of consciousness. 6. As to the relation in time which is maintained between the conscious act of will and the particular form of automatic cerebral excitation which we have called its physical basis, it is not possi- ble to pronounce with confidence. But there is no good reason to suppose that the conscious mental act is interpolated as an independent element of time, so to speak, among the physiological processes. The flow of consciousness from obscure sensation to perception and clear attentive discernment, then to the act of de- cision between two or more possible forms of appropriate movement, and, finally, to the issue of the right fiat of will, all keep pace with the corresponding physiological processes in the cerebral areas. As to the exact nature of these processes, and as to how they fur- 538 PHYSICAL BASIS OF VOLITION. nish necessary conditions to the mental movement, there is no in- formation to be imparted. 7. The problem is complicated when our consciousness becomes one of deciding to which of several presentations of sense or im- ages of memory we will to direct the attention. " Concerning the physiological processes," saysExner, 1 " from which we abstract the conception of attention we know absolutely nothing." This is true even when attention seems determined or forced upon us by causes over which the mind has no control ; it is, of course, more obviously true when the mind is conscious of deliberation and choice. The attention which directs to the single object and heightens the clear- ness of our perception, converting it into an " apperception," may properly be spoken of as an act of ivill ; but starting from the point of view of consciousness, it must be admitted that, in the majority of such activities of apperception, there is no consciousness of choice the will is determined in one way. This is equally true of the attachment of attention to certain particular images of the mental train, as that train is conducted along under the laws of association. Most things which we clearly perceive, or feel with any decided pain or pleasure, or which are vividly brought before the mind as images of memory and imagination, we cannot help attending to. The sudden flashing of a light, the passing of a bright object across the field of vision, the occurrence of a loud noise, or of a fainter one with a character that interests us, the smells in the atmosphere and the taste of our food, the sensations of the internal organs and of the skin, when sufficiently intense all these compulsorily draw after them the attention. They get themselves perceived by an im- pulsive and involuntary act of will. So, too, do the revived images of memory, in ordinary circumstances where the perception of ex- ternal objects is relatively suppressed, appear to force themselves upon the attention. In view of the foregoing familiar facts of consciousness, we may conjecture that when the cerebral centres are not preoccupied, as it were, with contradictory forms and phases of nerve-commotion, certain processes set up within them, whether due to external stim- uli or to changes in the blood-supply, are necessarily followed by the phenomena of conscious attention. Even when these centres are largely thus preoccupied, similar changes may be rapidly forced within them, by the action of some very strong excitation from the end-organs of sense, or from some connected cerebral centre. Hence the shock of surprise which sudden and vehement impressions cre- ate. In all such cases of forced attention the resulting tone of feek 1 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 283. THE DIRECTION OF ATTENTION. 539 ing in consciousness is different from that which prevails when the choice to attend is being deliberately maintained or persistently revived. The motifs of much of our activity of will in attention, therefore, plainly lie in that state of the cerebral centres which is compelled by the intensity of the stimulation they receive (either from external or internal stimuli). 1 If there were no other phe- nomena of will than those of forced attention, it would be necessary to admit the probability that all the mental activities are purely mechanical and absolutely dependent upon the action of the ner- vous system under the exciting influence of stimuli. 8. Certain phenomena of will in the form of attention suggest conclusions of a different order from the foregoing. Taking our point of starting again from consciousness, we know by a manifold expe- rience that the different degrees of clearness with which we perceive objects or apprehend the images of memory implies a graded appli- cation of attention. The grading of this application of attention is by no means always determined solely by the intensity of the stim- ulus, so far as we can measure such stimulus. It is a principle of wide reach, that to quote the words of Wundt " the degree of apperception is not to be measured according to the strength of the external impression, but according to the subjective activity by which the consciousness is applied to a definite sense-stimulus." The subjective activity which applies the consciousness, as it were, to this or that presentation of sense or image of memory, rather than to some other, is an activity of will ; and the effect of the activity is seen both in heightening the attention as directed to the object, and also in adapting the attention to the particular object upon which it is directed. Accompanying this twofold control of attention, and indeed forming the very basis upon which it rests, when deliberately exercised, is the consciousness of " choice " the activity of will in deciding the direction and amount of attention bestowed upon one ob- ject among several in the field of consciousness. Percepts and ideas do not move from the various obscurer parts of the field of con- sciousness into the focal point by virtue solely of a momentum be- longing to them as such ; they are placed and kept there by an act of will. This must be admitted as an indubitable fact of conscious- ness, whether or not the physiological correlate or so-called explana- tion of this fact can be discovered or even conjectured. Many indisputably valid phenomena, both those accessible to ordinary observation and those discovered by special experiment, 1 Comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologie, ii., pp. 387 ff.; and Staude, Der Be- griff d. Apperception in d. ueueren Psychologie, Philosoph. Studien, I., Heft ii., p. 1941 540 PHYSICAL BASIS OF VOLITION. illustrate the foregoing principle. By an act of will attention may be heightened and accommodated to the object, with a marked in- fluence upon apperception and the association of ideas. Upon this point we have to recall facts already mentioned. The effect of a voluntary increase of attention upon the reaction-time is to diminish it, of distracted attention to increase it or destroy its value alto- gether. 1 If, simultaneously, the ear is stimulated by the periodic strokes of a bell, and the retina by regularly recurring electrical sparks, the attention will naturally be directed to the former ; the image of the latter will then be located only very obscurely in the flow of consciousness, and the time of its occurrence may scarcely be noticed at all. We incline to attend to the stronger of two ex- citations of sense ; to yield to the inclination depresses the weaker still further perhaps below the plane of conscious perception. But within certain limits we attend where we will. We also incline to attend to objects lying in the point of regard of the field of vision, but we can will to attend to objects lying in the outward portions of this field. 2 The voluntary direction of attention in this case determines the apperception of these objects to the neglect of those lying in the more favorable parts of the field. We can at- tend to the field of vision of one eye, neglecting the other, as skil- ful microscopists do. We can see by voluntary attention the other- wise invisible double images. It is claimed by some experimenters with the "conflict of colors" in binocular vision, that, by the direc- tion of attention, when a green image is formed on one eye and a red upon the other, they can see either at will, or at will can com- bine the two. Experiments with instantaneous illumination by the electrical spark also demonstrate in a marked way the effect of attention. Objects which under ordinary circumstances are without great effort seen, either as stereoscopic or as double images, can also be seen in both ways by the electric spark, according to the direction of attention. The first impression is ordinarily stereoscopic ; but if a pause of 10 sec. be allowed for the after-images to die away, the experimenter can at will see the double images, although the point of fixation and the influence of the light remain absolutely the same. 3 The effect of attention in analyzing composite musical 1 See the table of Obersteiner, Brain, I., p. 439, to show the fluctuations of the reaction-time of a person reacting while an organ was playing in the same room. The normal reaction-time of the person being 0.100 sec., it rose to 0.148, and even 0.215, while the instrument was heard, and fell to 0.095 and 0.087 during pauses in the playing. - See Helmholtz, Physiolog. Optik, p. 740 f . 3 Ibid. , p. 741. EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON MEMORY. . 541 clangs into their elements is equally marked. 1 In addition to a previous acquaintance with the character of such over-tones as are to be expected and analyzed out of the clang, the analysis can take place in no case without a " certain undisturbed concentration of the attention." That changes in the clearness of perceptions take place in dependence on the changes in the degree of attention is a matter of the most ordinary experience. On waking gradually from sleep our surroundings become less and less obscure to the senses of eye, ear, and skin, as the grade of voluntary attention in apperception progressively rises. On casting the glance casually upon a landscape seen through a window, its objects are, at first, scarcely perceived at all ; by gradual increase in the intensity of attention (changing the casual glance into a steady look) these objects become apperceived more and more clearly. The voluntary concentration of attention (comp. p. 446 f.) often dissolves an error of sense or changes the entire appearance of the visual object. On the other hand, a great strain of attention may lead one to anticipate an expected impression of sense, and perceive its occurrence before it has actually taken place. It may also cause other illusions, as when, on expecting eagerly the stroke of the clock, some weaker sound may be mistaken for it. 2 9. Voluntary attention directed toward the images of memory has also a marked effect upon their character and duration in con- sciousness. In certain cases it may impart to them the vividness of presentations of sense, although the power to bring this about differs greatly for the different senses and in different individuals. By an effort of will the player of a musical instrument can cause himself to feel again the revived images of the muscular and tactual sensations which accompanied a particular exercise of his skill. The hearer of some impressive musical air may voluntarily set it running, with its variation of tone and rhythm, through his mind's ear, as it were. Not to speak of hallucinations and visions, most men see sights in dreams, and even in reverie, that closely approach the intensity of the presentations of sense in the waking state and in broad daylight. Artists in forms of art involving a special sus- ceptibility and activity of some one or more of the senses, are, of course, gifted with a specialized creative energy of imagination. Particular images of memory may be seized upon at will, as it were, and the attention so concentrated upon them as to impart to them much of the strength which their originals enjoyed. Moreover, the effect of attention upon certain images of memory 1 Hehnholtz, Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen, etc. , p. 84 f. 2 See Fechner, Elemente d. Psycho-physik, ii., p. 491 f. 542 PHYSICAL BASIS OF VOLITION. is such as apparently to localize them anew in the organs by which these originals were formed. To try to revive a melody as distinctly as possible produces a sense of strain (a feeling of being innervated) in the region of the ear. We recall sounds, especially if we recall them vividly, with the organs of hearing. The prolonged effort to recall or image colors or visual forms tires the visual organs ; the impression is as though the recollection or imagination were accom- plished in and through these organs. The violin-player remembers and goes over the solo he is to play, not only in his ear, but in his arms and fingers. Upon such power of reproduction the power of new production depends. Indeed, we may say that " the activity of voluntary sensuous attention largely consists in a voluntary re- production of earlier conditions of sensations." l It has even been claimed that vivid representative images of color-sensations may be followed by the corresponding negative after-images. 2 10. Concerning the physiological basis of the phenomena of voluntary attention, little is known. Apparently, part of the effect must be due to the changed condition which is brought about in the end-organs of sense when especially innervated and so prepared for receiving the stimulation appropriate to them. To this fact is due the peculiar feeling of strain in the organ of attentive apper- ception, or of vivid reproduction of the image of memory. But the chief effect of attention is realized in the altered condition of the cerebral centres. It is only obvious, according to Exner, 3 that we have to do with changes in the central mechanism set up by act of will, and that these changes vary quantitatively and concern the circles of our psychical activity. Moreover, the point of attach- ment, as it were, for the attention is found only after the impres- sion of sense has been elaborated to a certain degree. We cannot \ voluntarily attend without perceiving, at least obscurely, that to which (presentation of sense or image of memory) attention is to be directed. Still further, fluctuations of the cerebral activity are constantly occurring ; for, as every one knows who has expe- rimented with himself (for example in determining reaction-time), it is impossible to keep attention on a perfectly steady stretch with respect to its object. Waves .of consciousness in connection with these fluctuations of attention rise and fall. 4 In the most suc- cessful reactions the attention is- effectual in producing and inain- 1 Comp. G. E. Miiller, Zur Theorie d. sinnliclien Aufmerksamkeit, Leipzig, p. 89. 2 Wundt, Vorlesungen uber Mensch u. Thier, I. , p. 387. 3 In Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., iL, p. 283. 4 Comp. Feehner, Elemente d. Psvcho-physik, ii. , p. 452 . INFLUENCE OF THE FRONTAL REGIONS. 543 taining a state of strained expectation, in which the occurrence of the expected stimulation sets the motor mechanism off without, and even in spite of, a separate act of will. In such cases the cerebral centres have apparently been thrown into an exalted and explosive state of irritability. We all know that very little suffices to set the muscles agoing when the mind is on the stretch. It is not unlikely that the effect of attention is felt in depressing certain cerebral areas not intimately connected with the production of the particular image of memory or presentation of sense, as well as in heightening the activity of others that are thus connected. 1 The phenomena, at any rate, imply an increased difference of excitability and conductivity for their specific forms of nerve-commotion in the different cerebral areas. Under the influence of attention the cerebrum has become more susceptible for certain impressions, less so for certain others. 2 Stored energy of the nerve-cells is being rapidly called forth. Con- centrated voluntary attention implies a large amount of work being done in the cerebral hemispheres. We recognize this fact in the ac- companying feelings of strain and in the subsequent feelings of brain -exhaustion. The subject of experiment to determine the reaction-time under concentrated attention often, though sitting quiet, sweats profusely. 11. What happens when two different excitations, arising either from conflicting presentations of sense, or conflicting ideas, meet in any single region of the brain ? We can only answer this question with vague conjecture. The phenomena of the conflict of colors in binocular vision seem to imply that either the more intense of the two may prevail over the other, or the two may both persist and interpenetrate as it were. In certain cases voluntary attention may determine which event shall ensue. The sugar sweetens the acid of the lemonade, not in the vessel which contains it or on the tongue which tastes it, but in the brain. According to the con- jecture of Wundt, 3 the frontal regions of the cerebrum are the " bearers (Trdger) of the physiological processes which accompany the apperception of the presentations of sense." In order, then, that the process set up in any cerebral region by an excitation of the organs of sense connected with it may result in clear discern- ment of an object, certain physiological processes must be con- ducted from the frontal regions to that region. Wundt's con- jecture is plausible, at least it gives the frontal region something to do, and answers in part the inquiry why so much of the cere- 1 See G. E. Mia Her, Zur Theorie d. smnlicheu Aufmerksamkeit, p. 52 f. ' 2 See Exner, in Pfluger's Archiv, xi., p. 428. 3 Physiolog. Psycliologie, i. , p. 218. 544 PHYSICAL BASIS OF VOLITION. bral substance should seem merely negative as respects the phe- nomena of sensation and motion. 12. Nothing thus far said, and nothing of scientific value which physiological psychology has to offer, throws any clear light on the problem of the "freedom of the will." When M. Luys, 1 for exam- ple, maintains that to imagine " we think of an object by a spon- taneous effort of mind is an illusion" and that, in fact, the object is only forced on us by the cunning conjurer, the brain, " because the cell-territory where that object resides has been previously set vi- brating in the brain," he is controverting a plain and universal dictum of consciousness by his private and unverifiable hypothesis on a question of cerebral physiology where experts and novices are alike ignorant. Physiology neither disproves nor verifies the post- ulate of free will ; accordingly, this postulate must be raised and discussed upon other grounds. Metaphysics and ethics cannot properly dictate their facts and conclusions to the science of physi- ological psychology ; but, in turn, this science cannot properly dictate to metaphysics and ethics the conclusions which they shall draw from facts of consciousness, by giving out its myths and fa- bles in the garb of well-ascertained history of the cerebral pro- cesses. 13. Consciousness, or the having any form of sentient life, in distinction from being in a condition of dreamless sleep or swoon- ing, and Self-consciousness, or the recognition of the states of con- sciousness as states of the ego or subject of them all, are inti- mately connected with the phenomena of will. By the amount and speed of the energy expended in attention we measure in large degree the extent and intensity of consciousness. The stir of feel- ing through the presentation of some object of sense, or through some idea, causes us, either voluntarily or involuntarily, to rouse ourselves to what is then recognized as a wider and higher energy of consciousness. But inasmuch as consciousness is the condition of all internal experience whatsoever, we cannot deduce or explain the essential nature of consciousness from other forms of such ex- perience. 2 For the same reason we cannot define consciousness. Concerning the physical basis of consciousness little can be added to what has already been said concerning the physical basis of the various forms of consciousness. Consciousness is never con- sciousness in general neyer_an activity or state that may be sep- arated from the individual states and processes of consciousness. In the case of man, the cerebrum is apparently the sole, as it cer- 1 The Brain and its Functions, p. 254. * Comp. Wundt, Physiolog. Psychologic, ii. , p. 195 f. CONDITIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS. 545 tainly is the chief, organ of consciousness (comp. pp. 249 ff.). By calling the cerebrum the " organ " of consciousness, however, little more is meant than that the constitution and processes of the ner- vous matter of t^ris organ are related in the most immediate and special way to all mental phenomena, and that what takes place in material elements outside of the cerebrum (including the elements of the other portions of the nervous system) has an effect upon con- sciousness only in case it gets itself represented, as it were, in the corresponding cerebral processes. As to a special organ of con- sciousness in the brain that is, a cerebral area where the mind comes to consciousness it is not proper to speak. Accordingly, the physical basis of the different forms of con- sciousness is laid in those cerebral areas which have been found to be or, though still undiscovered, actually are especially con- nected with these forms. But if the question is further pressed as to the physical basis for the activities of self-consciousness, no answer can be given or even suggested. From its very nature that mar- vellous verifying actus of mind in which it recognizes itself as the subject of its own states, and also recognizes the states as its own, can have no analogous or corresponding material substratum. It is impossible to specify any physiological process representing this unifying actus ; it is even impossible to imagine how the descrip- tion of any such process (in case we knew what to attempt to de- scribe) could be brought into intelligible relation with this unique mental power. In general, concerning the physical conditions of consciousness', it is known that they are dependent upon the character and amount of the blood-supply. To stop this supply is to put an end for the time to consciousness ; to impede or corrupt it is to depress and to disturb consciousness ; to alter its character is to affect, more or less promptly and profoundly, the character of consciousness. The character of the circulation in the cerebrum largely determines the nature of the phenomena of consciousness. Quickened circulation here accelerates or agitates the circuit and time-rate of conscious- ness ; slower circulation diminishes and inhibits them. It has been alleged by Mosso that certain changes in the relative circula- tion of the human body occur when the attention is occupied in- tensely either with external impressions or with psychical work. Such observations are not as yet extended and accordant enough to command unhesitating assent to the details of their results. 14. The other group of so-called higher mental phenomena which admits of the most of probable conjecture regarding the nat- ure of its physical basis comprises Memory, as retentive and re- 35 546 PHYSICAL BASIS OF MEMORY. productive, and the laws of the Association of Ideas. The experience of consciousness is one of a constantly changing succession of states. The rise and fall in voluntary or involuntary attention, and the change of its direction, are accompanied by a continual alteration of the phases and of the circuit of consciousness. Of these shifting mental states certain ones bear the peculiar mark of a claim to rep- resent previous states of consciousness, in some regard and to some extent similar to themselves. The image of memory is itself a prod- uct, a phase, of present consciousness ; it is not itself of the past, and yet it claims, by virtue of its essential character, to stand for the past. This claim can, of course, in no instance be verified by carrying the consciousness back to that past ; we are never able by attentive apperception to compare the image of memory with its alleged original and thus make sure of the validity of the claim. Experience also teaches us that the mental images do not come and go wholly at random and irrespective of the characteristic con- tent of such as are most closely connected in time. That these images are associated in time is a part of the fundamental fact of memory ; mental states are not states of memory without some more or less definite localization of the ideas thus presented to the mind with reference to its past. Further examination of the particular character of the ideas which most frequently occur simultaneously, or in closest succes- sion, has given rise to the assumption that the images of memory are associated in a regular way. Hence those general facts of psy- chology called the "laws of the association of ideas." From the phenomena of memory and reminiscence, as experienced in the consciousness of the individual, arises the belief that the objects of past experience are retained in the mind, and that they suggest each other (at least ordinarily) in some orderly way. But properly speaking, the " retention " of states of consciousness, whether of ideas or of presentations of sense, is not a faculty or power of mind. To ask, 'Where is the idea I once had, or the object I once saw, between the time of the original experience and the time of recall, is to ask a question that can have only one answer. Such idea or presentation of sense is nowhere, for it does not exist in any sense of the word whatever. Both presentation of sense and image of memory are transitory phases of consciousness, each per- ishes with that phase of consciousness in which, and as which, it has its existence. It is the power of recall solely which induces us to speak as though the mental object were retained or kept in the Mind. It is only in the facts and laws of conscious reproduction that any trace of the activity of mind, as memory, is to be found. Much PRIMARY 131 AGE OF MEMORY. 547 "cerebration" may be unconscious; there may be considerable periods of complete unconsciousness in the daily life of every indi- vidual, as there certainly are such periods occasionally in the lives of some individuals. But of unconscious retention or reproduction of ideas as an activity of mind, there is none. 15. Both ordinary observation and experiment in reaction-time indicate that the speed with which the images of memory vanish depends upon a variety of circumstances such as individual pe- culiarities, intensity and frequency of the repetition of the original impression, condition of the cerebral centres and of the conscious- ness at the time of this impression, etc. The thousands of faint impressions which enter into every-day life seem quickly to vanish, without leaving a trace behind in either body or mind. But that these impressions do linger for a time in memory, as we say, or are reproducible in consciousness under the form of images of memory, there can be no doubt. For example, if, while one per- son is intently counting the lines of a page or adding a column of figures, another near by makes some slight motion, the image of the motion in the mind of the former may be recalled within a few seconds of the occurrence ; a little later, however, such an image may have so completely vanished that the observer will declare the motion was not noticed at all. 1 The vividness of fresh images of memory may be so great as even to make it difficult to distinguish them from true presentations of sense. But even in the case of impressions made clear and strong by the strenuous concentration of attention, the vividness of the image of memory diminishes at first very quickly. Even in such a case the so-called " primary " image of memory may not last beyond a few minutes ; while in cases where there is little attentive apperception this image van- ishes in a few seconds. 2 Let a line of given length be regarded for a brief time, then removed, and after a varying interval the effort made to recall its image so as to compare it accurately with another line of nearly the same length. It will be found that the clearness of the image of memory, which quickly falls off at first, falls off afterward more slowly, and finally approximates more nearly to a stationary condition. Lotze 3 has insisted upon the caution that we should not confuse the clearness of ideas with their intensity ; the idea of the most intense brightness is not intensely bright. Yet we cannot agree with Lotze in the opinion that the ideating activity, when applied to the recall of sensations, does not differ in intensity 1 See Exner, in Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol., II., ii., p. 281 f. 2 Comp. Fechner, Elemente d. Psycho physik, ii., p. 491. 3 Outlines of Psychology, p. 28 f. 548 PHYSICAL BASIS OF MEMORY. as well as in clearness. Besides the difference in the clearness with which two persons, for example, remember a mosaic of colors, as re- spects all the details of what particular colors were arranged in what particular order, there is also a difference in the strength which the various revived images of the colors have in the two consciousnesses.. 16. That the mental phenomena which lead us to speak of the retentive power of memory have a physical basis there can be no doubt. This conclusion is warranted by the nature of the phenom- ena themselves, by the impossibility (already alluded to) of con- ceiving of a permanent modification of unconscious mind, and by all that we know of the principles of biology in general and of hu- man physiology in particular. Every sensory impulse, and every combination of such impulses, must produce changes both in the end-organs and in the central organs ; and although these changes vanish, so far as their effect in the corresponding phenomena of conscious mind is concerned, they nevertheless cannot fail to leave the organs in different condition from that in which they found them. As a matter of course, the effect of stimulus upon every end-organ of sense consists in the production of molecular changes, which, on account of the principle of inertia as applied to such or- gan, continue for a time after the stimulus has been removed. Of this fact the existence of the after-images on the retina is the most notable example. The successive stages passed through by the af- ter-images, both positive and subsequently negative, are themselves indicative of a series of molecular changes set up by the action of the stimulus. But the effects of stimulus must also be felt in the production of molecular changes in the central organs, in the nerve- elements (especially the nerve-cells) of the cerebral hemispheres, if the sensory impulses are to result in conscious sensation and per- ception. Experience would then lead us to infer, further, that each combination of sensations produces changes in the cerebral hemi- spheres which outlast the action of the stimulus upon the end-organ of sense. A study of consciousness, simply as consisting of chang- ing sensations and perceptions, might appear to indicate that the after-forms of molecular changes themselves die out and leave the end-organs and cerebral centres in precisely the same condition as before. But the formation of habits of perception and motion, the phenomena of conscious mental reproduction, and the general principles of molecular science as applied to the nervous mechan- ism, suggest and enforce another view. Certain experiences in the use of the senses show that molecular activities induced in the end-organs by stimulation may, under cer- tain circumstances, persist much longer than we are at first inclined FORMING OF MOLECULAE TENDENCIES. 549 to suppose. For example, a study of the after-images left by strong impressions on the retina shows that traces of them recur again and again, even several minutes after the eyes have been closed. Prolonged work with the microscope will cause the images seen in its focus to " live in the fundus of the eye " so that, after several hours, shutting the eyes will cause these images to reappear with great distinctness. Of a similar kind is our experience with sounds the rattle of the railroad-car after a long journey, the im- pressive cries or words to which we have listened, the successive notes and chords of the musical composition heard at a concert, seem to be repeated in the ear for hours after the primary sensa- tions have subsided. According to Dr. Moos, 1 after long musical seances the sounds persisted for fifteen days in one patient ; and a professor of music was accustomed to hear over again the notes sounded, for several hours after each lesson. After startling and impressive experiences with different kinds of sense-percepts sounds, sights, etc. it is not an uncommon thing for the same bodily affections to recur with such vividness as to make it almost impossible at the instant to distinguish them from fresh experi- ences of the same kind. Moreover, all those inherited and acquired unconscious habits of motion, with which the study of the nervous mechanism has already made us familiar, imply that the effects of repeated stimulations persist in the molecular constitution and tendencies to molecular change of the nervous substance of the central organs. The puppy which has inherited a brain and spinal cord embodying the habits of his race, and the trained gymnast or skilled player on a musical instrument, alike illustrate this principle of stored and organic ex- perience as pertaining to the elements of the nervous system. The general principle of molecular science, which finds numerous ex- amples both in inorganic chemistry and in biology, compels a similar conclusion as to the physical basis of memory. The estab- lished practice of photography depends upon the fact that a plate of dry collodion, after being briefly exposed to the sun's rays, re- tains for weeks, in the darkness, the effects of the indescribably deli- cate changes which have been brought about in it. The " latent image " contained in it may be revived by proper treatment. The phenomena of phosphorescence, also, show that the impressions of the luminous undulations persist in certain bodies for a consider- able time after these undulations themselves have ceased acting. Niepce de Saint- Victor 2 has shown that such undulations may be 1 So Luys, The Brain and its Functions, p. 136. - Comptes-rendus de I'Academie des Sciences, xlv. , p. 811 , and xlvi., p. 448. 550 PHYSICAL BASIS OF MEMORY. " to some extent garnered up in a sheet of paper," ready to be re- vealed at the call of special reagents. Inasmuch as the nervous system consists of an inconceivably complicated and delicate molec- ular mechanism, every element of which may be regarded as a highly complex molecular structure, it may well be expected to ac- complish much more wonderful results than the plate of dry col- lodion or sheet of paper, in the way of storing up for future de- mand the results of the impressions made upon it. We may even go so far as to say that the retentive power of this molecular mech- anism is perf ect ; ' that it never loses entirely the effect of any im- pression once made upon it. 17. In view of such considerations as the foregoing it has been proposed by some writers to regard memory simply as one phase of the general biological fact, as a particular form of synthesis " of one of the primordial properties of the nervous elements." Con- .scious memory is then considered as "a phosphorescence of the nervous elements " plus consciousness ; and this power of these elements itself is "to be called a power of "unconscious reminis- cences " (M. Luys) or an " organic memory " (Hering and M. Ribot). But, while admitting the general fact of molecular science, and the application of it to the phenomena of habit in the nervous mechan- ism as contributing something to the description of the physical basis of conscious memory, it is wise to refuse to use such terms as the foregoing. For these terms are not needed to state the facts ; of themselves they lend nothing to the desired explanation, and they are liable to lead to serious confusion. " Organic " memory, or the habitual mode of the behavior of the nervous system, to- gether with that tendency to reproduce the mode which belongs to all habits, when minus consciousness, is not memory at all ; it bears, indeed, no resemblance to memory. " Unconscious" reminis- cence, regarded as a function of material elements, is not reminis- cence at all. Moreover, when we inquire as to precisely what constitutes this wonderful power of conserving the results of molecular changes induced by the action of stimuli, which the nervous system pos- sesses, we find it impossible to give a wholly satisfactory answer. The most plausible answer consists in inferences touching the highly probable application of certain biological laws to the special case of the nervous system, regarded as furnishing a physical basis for the phenomena of memory. The general fact from which these inferences take their point of starting is undoubted ; the entire nervous mechanism must be regarded as a vast system of interrelated elements (nerve-fibres and nerve-cells), each of which must also bo EFFECT OF ALTEREP NUTRITION. 551 regarded as a system of interrelated molecules. The excitation and propagation of nerve-commotion consists in producing and continu- ing changes in the atomic structure and mutual relations of these molecules. In order to account for that " bent," direction, or ten- dency to act in a certain way, which all habit, of the nervous system presupposes, the internal molecular alteration of the nervous ele- ments, especially of the individual nerve-cells, has to be assumed. But the power of propagating their kind belongs to these individ- ual nerve-cells ; and it is likely that all the essential principles of heredity and evolution apply to the exercise of this power in the case of these cells. The biological laws which control the nutrition of living organ- isms also have an application to the nervous elements. The exer- cise of any of the nerve-cells or groups of nerve-cells of which the end-organ or the central organ is composed tends to enlarge them by appropriation of the nutriment brought to them in the blood- supply. Such nutrition, however, will necessarily be dependent, for the special type which must characterize its manner of building, upon the acquired molecular character of the cells that build the new material into themselves. And when the cells, thus enlarged and molecularly altered according to the character and amount of their exercise, multiply themselves, their offspring of new cells will necessarily come under the general principle of heredity in its ap- plication to all living cells. Accordingly, three things must be taken into the account when considering what has been called (ineptly, as we believe) " organic memory," namely : (1) The en- largement of the single cells or fibres of which the organ is com- posed ; (2) the multiplication of these elements so that new cells and fibres originate under the laws of heredity ; (3) the internal molecular alteration of the nerve-cells and nerve-fibres. 1 18. Furthermore, it is certain that the unity and continuity of the nervous system is such, even with respect to its individual cells, that alterations in one group of elements involve alterations in other groups. Indeed, it is much more difficult to predict where such sympathetic alteration will end than to affirm that it certainly must begin and proceed to considerable lengths. The phenomena of aphasia, for example (see chap. EL, 25 ff.), indicate how many and intricate are the ways in which those elements of the central organs must be internally connected and related that constitute the physical basis of the memory as retentive and reproductive of the ideas and symbols of articulate speech. The phenomena occurring 1 See the Vortrag of E. Hering, Ueber d. Gedaclitniss als eine allgemeine Function d. organisirten Materie. Wien, 1876. 552 PHYSICAL BASIS OF MEMORY. in other diseases than aphasia, and in so-called " freaks " of mem- ory, clearly indicate the same truth. But no attempt to bring these phenomena under any strictly scientific formulas has hitherto been rewarded with any considerable success. By continual cor- related action on the part of groups and areas of nervous elements more or less remotely situated, such elements become in some sort associated together ; being thus associated together, they tend to act together for mutual helpfulness and modification (that is, to intensify, inhibit, or characteristically alter each other), whenever either one is in any manner roused to yield up the energy it has in store. The physical basis of memory as retentive is therefore laid in the habit, or acquired tendency, of the elements of the nervous sys- tem both as respects the molecular constitution of the individual elements, and also as respects the association of groups of these elements more or less distant from each other. Each element of this system, especially in the more significant of its central organs, may be considered as a minute area intersected by an indefinite number of curves of different directions and orders ; thus a molec- ular commotion in any such area may, according to its character and point of greatest intensity, run out into the system along any one of these many curves. In every such small fragment " the whole curve slumbers," although the microscope of the histologist cannot detect the full significance of the fragment or distinguish it from similar fragments of other curves intersecting each other in the same area. 1 19. The nature of the physical basis of memory considered as reproductive, under the so-called laws of association, is even more purely conjectural than that of memory considered as retentive. To speak of an excitation as imprinting itself upon the cerebral cells, and " perpetuating itself in them in the form of persistent vibrations," or to imply that mental reproduction is only the weaker "echo" of these vibratory conditions, to persist in which is the mysterious property of all the nervous elements as does M. Luys Q is neither good physics nor good psychology. The nature of nerve-commotion, so far as we know anything about it, is not such as fitly to be described by the word " vibrations ;" and that the forms of nerve-commotion, even if properly described by this word, do not " persist " within the cells, there is every reason to believe. Much more unobjectionable is the language used by M. Ribot 3 to describe 1 A figure of speech adapted from Hering, Ueber d. Gedachtniss, etc., p. 15 f. * See The Brain and its Functions, p. 147 f. 3 Diseases of Memory, p. 26 f. SO-CALLED DYNAMICAL ASSOCI the conjectural physical basis of the same psychical phenomena. According to the hypothesis of this authority, " determinate associa- tions," or "dynamic affinities," are formed among the nervous elements by their acting together; by repetition these affinities may become as stable as are the primitive anatomical connections. Such " dynamical associations have a much more important part to play in conscious memory than in organic memory." A rich and extensive memory is not a collection of impressions (for all such terms as " impression," " imprint," " registration," etc., are inap- plicable to the case), but an accumulation of those dynamical asso- ciations that are " very stable and very responsive to proper stim- uli." The recurrence of some ideas rather than others, as started by this or that sensuous impression or other phase of conscious- ness, would then depend upon the character, number, and strength, respectively, of the different " dynamical associations." 20. According to the physiological theory of memory, forget- fulness, or loss of memory, is to be accounted for as the result of the process of dissolution. As says M. Eibot: * "To live is to ac- quire and lose ; life consists of dissolution as well as assimilation. Forgetfulness is dissolution." A large amount of such " forgetful- ness " must then be considered as indispensable to the exercise of memory ; for if all the alterations of the intermolecular constitution of the nerve-cells were alike conserved and propagated, and if all the dynamical associations among the different more or less remote groups of these cells were equally stable, there could be no basis laid for specific and characteristic reproduction of the images of memory. The survival of any of these associations involves the dissolution of many others. Under this general fact of the condi- tions of forgetfulness the phenomena of those sudden losses and disturbances which lesion of the cerebral substance often produces must be brought. Temporary forgetfulness or disturbance of memory may be assumed to be connected simply with such func- tional derangement of the cerebral centres as interferes with the working of the customary " dynamical associations " among the nervous elements of which these centres are composed, or with which they are regularly connected. 21. No good ground exists for speaking of any special organ or seat of memory. Every organ indeed, every area and every ele- ment of the nervous system has its own memory. This view be- longs to the very essence of every theory which considers conscious mental reproduction as only one form or phase of the biological fact of " organic memory." We might properly speak, then, of the 1 Diseases of Memory, p. 61. 554 PHYSICAL BASIS OF MEMORY. memory of the end-organ of vision or of hearing, of the memory of the spinal cord and of the different so-called " centres " of reflex action belonging to the cord, of the memory of the medulla ob- longata, the cerebellum, etc. But if only the cerebral hemispheres are specially and directly related to the phenomena of conscious- ness, then it is only the organic memory of these hemispheres which can be spoken of as the physical basis of our memory. For only the molecular constitution and dynamical associations of the nervous elements of this organ can immediately determine the character of conscious mental reproduction. Much of the foregoing language arouses a protest against such a misuse of psychological terms. The fact that repeated action un- der stimulation of the nerve-cells of the cerebral cortex results in a modification of their molecular constitution, and in the establish- ment of certain tendencies to associated action among them, is doubtless a biological fact. It is, perhaps, most important in lay- ing the physical basis, in determining the physical antecedents and concomitants of memory ; but it is not in any sense a fact of mem- ory. It is no more fitly called " organic memory " than are the molecular alterations produced by generations of use in the wood of an old Cremona. The changes in nerve-cells are indeed far dif- ferently related to memory from the changes that take place in the molecules of the violin ; but it is only the addition of consciousness to the whole transaction that gives us any right to characterize it by the word " memory." 22. Just as there is no such experience as that of willing in general, so there is no such experience as that of remembering in general. The image of memory always possesses certain character- istic features ; and if it be an image representing the percept of some one of the special senses, its features are determined by the nature of the percept which it represents. There is sound reason for the customary form of speech which recognizes a good or bad " memory of the ear," of the eye, etc. Such phrases might fitly be extended to all the forms of sensation and perception ; and, indeed, to all the mental experiences capable of being represented by the images of memory. It would be equally fitting to speak of a good memory of the fingers, of the tongue, of the larynx and other or- gans of speech, etc. Inasmuch as the sensations which arise in, and the movements which are imparted to, all these peripheral por- tions of the body have their representatives in certain cerebral areas, the physical conditions of the images of memory (the physical basis of the different kinds of memory) are undoubtedly laid in these same areas. There is no one place where memory, par excellence, PECULIARITIES OF MEMORY. 555 is at home in the brain ; or from which it rules the different organs of expression by making involuntary or voluntary sallies forth, as it were. Yet the memory of any one thing or event involves so many complex and closely related activities of mind and doubtless also of the brain that it is impossible to tell how far weakness or dis- turbance set up at any single point may succeed in spreading itself. As to the physical basis for characteristic weaknesses or excel- lences of memory (such as the inability or marked ability to remem- ber names, or dates, etc.), and for those apparent freaks of mem- ory which some emotion or bodily disturbance may produce, little can be affirmed with confidence. Where the mental peculiarity ex- tends to rather a large range of subjects, such as come under one spe- cial sense, or under one of the more general forms of the operation of one sense, the natural constitution or acquired condition of the particular organs involved may be assumed to be peculiar. The phrases, " a good ear " for music, " a good eye " for form, color, proportion, or whatever is visible, have doubtless both a psycho- logical and a physiological significance. But what reason should exist in the brain why some particular date or name should re- peatedly slip away beyond the power of attention to recall it (Forbes Winslow tells of a man who, after a fever, lost all knowledge of the letter F), while other dates or names in which we have had little in- terest cling so as to make it difficult to be rid of them, even conject- ure fails to make evident. That there is such physical reason, how- ever, the phenomena of aphasia, and of other diseases of memory, as well as the results of experimentation upon animals for the locali- zation of cerebral function, all seem strongly to indicate. The physi- cal reason for those times of general depression or exaltation of con- scious memory, with which almost all persons are familiar, is less difficult to assign. Such reason is to be found chiefly in the changes of character and quantity suffered by the blood-supply of the cerebral areas especially in their effect upon the extremely sensitive nerve-cells which abound there. All calculations as to the possibility of representing all the in- dividual ideas and images of memory by one or more nerve-cells and nerve-fibres each, we regard as wholly useless whether the number of nerve-cells in the cerebrum be, as Meynert calculates, 600,000,000, or even many more, as LionelBeale supposes. Every- thing which psychology teaches as to the character of the mental phenomena, and everything which physiology teaches as to the nature of the cerebral functions, discourages the puerile attempt to connect separate mental images or ideas with isolated nerve-cells as their product. 556 PHYSICAL BASIS OF MEMORY. 23. It will doubtless occur to thoughtful readers that nothing which has thus far been said concerning the physical basis of will and memory is, in any true sense of the word, an explanation of these mental activities. In what sense physiological psychology can be said to explain any mental phenomena we shall consider elsewhere. But in the particular case of memory, for example, none of the relations conjectured as probably existing between the molecular constitution and dynamical associations of the cerebrum, on the one hand, and the facts of conscious experience, on the other hand, even on the supposition that these conjectured rela- tions were all demonstrated facts of psycho-physical science, would amount to anything approaching the character of an explanation. For none of these physical conditions immediately concerns the very mental activity which constitutes the essence of conscious mem- ory. What is explained, if anything, is simply why I remember one thing rather than another granted the mind's power to remember at all. This power is a spiritual activity wholly sui generis, and in- capable of being conceived of as flowing out of any physical condi- tion or mode of energy whatever. The truth of the position just taken may be enforced (among other considerations) by certain conclusions which resulted from our psycho-physical study of perception. In the study of percep- tion psycho-physics can do much toward a scientific explanation. It can tell what qualities of stimuli produce certain qualities of sensations ; it can suggest a principle relating the quantity of the stimuli to the intensity of the sensation ; it can investigate the laws under which, by combined action of various excitations, the sensa- tions are combined into presentations of sense ; it can show how the time-relations of the sensations and percepts in consciousness correspond to the objective relations in time of the stimulations. But for that spiritual activity which actually puts together in con- sciousness the sensations, it cannot even suggest the beginning of a physical explanation. Moreover, no cerebral process can be con- ceived of which in case it were known to exist could possibly be regarded as a fitting physical basis for this unifying actus of mind. Thus also, and even more emphatically, must we insist upon the complete inability of physiology to suggest an explana- tion for conscious memory, in so far as it is memory that is, in so far as it most imperatively calls for explanation. Any example of an act of memory will serve to illustrate the fore- going truth. Let it be supposed that one has looked for a few seconds steadily at certain pickets of a fence standing in the open sunlight. On closing the eyes, the strong positive after-image of THE MYSTERY OF MEMORY. 557 the object remains for some seconds presented to the mind ; this positive after-image is then succeeded by a succession of negative after-images. When these latter have subsided, one can still recall the image of the section of the fence seen some minutes since ; one can recall the same image the next day, or the next week, or after an indefinite length of time. But a very marked difference exists be- tween that which is before consciousness in these cases of so-called recollection and that which was before consciousness while the im- pression of sense was going though its various phases of dying away. Physiological explanations, having reference chiefly to the action of the nervous elements in the retina, may be given as to why the after-images are produced, and as to why they have the order of succession which actually belongs to them. Other physio- logical explanations, having to do chiefly with assumed activities of the cerebral nervous elements, may attempt the problem, why the image of memory is fainter than the original impression of sense, and why this image rather than some other is represented at a particular time. But all such psycho-physical explanation does not touch, does not even approach, the real mystery of memory. The positive after-image of the pickets of the fence is not the same as the per- cept which preceded it ; nor is it the same as the negative after- image, or the images of memory, which follow it. Yet all these images are regarded by the mind as similar to the original object ; indeed, as standing for it. How can they be regarded as similar to one another, and to their common original, when no two of them are at the same instant before consciousness in order to be com- pared together there ? The very essence of the act of memory con- sists in the ability to say : This after-image is the image of a per- cept I had a moment since ; or this image of memory is the image of the percept I had at a certain time I do not remember precisely how long since. It would, then, be quite contrary to the facts to hold that, when the image of memory appears in consciousness, it is recognized as belonging to a particular original percept on account of its per- ceived resemblance to this percept. The original percept does not exist, and will never be reproduced. Even more palpably false and absurd would it be to hold that any similarity of the impressions or processes in end-organs or central organs explains the act of conscious memory. Consciousness, of course, knows nothing of such similarity in impressions and processes ; knows nothing even of the existence of nervous impressions and processes. Moreover, we could never know two impressions or processes that are sepa- rated in time to be similar, without implying this same inexplicable 558 PHYSICAL BASIS OF JUDGMENT. act of memory. It is a fact of consciousness, on which all possi- bility of connected experience and of recorded and cumulative hu- man knowledge is dependent, that certain phases or products of consciousness appear with a claim to stand for (to represent) past experiences to which they are regarded as in some respect similar. It is this peculiar claim in consciousness which constitutes the es- sence of an act of memory ; it is this which makes memory wholly inexplicable as a mere persistence or recurrence of similar impres- sions. It is this which makes conscious memory a spiritual phe- nomenon, the explanation of which, as arising out of nervous pro- cesses and conditions, is not simply undiscovered in fact, but utterly incapable of approach by the imagination. When, then, we speak of a physical basis of memory, recognition must be made of the complete inability of science to suggest any physical process which can be conceived of as correlated with that peculiar and mysterious actus of the mind, connecting its present and its past, which constitutes the essence of memory. 24. We decline to enter upon the discussion of a special physi- cal basis for the mind's power to form generalized concepts, to combine the elements of past experience into the creations of in- vention and art, to discover laws, and to reason about a world of reality assumed to exist e^ra-mentally, or about the nature and order of the phenomena of its own consciousness. There is abso- lutely no scientific ground on which to place such a discussion. A physical basis of the logical faculty, so far as it is a subject of either knowledge or conjecture, is laid in those general processes of the nervous system that are correlated with the elementary forms of mental activity upon which the higher forms are built, as it were, or which they presuppose. Particularly important is the function of articulate language in serving as a support for the logi- cal processes. But that which is peculiar to all these forms of psychical activities, and which causes them to be spoken of as higher and more distinctively spiritual faculties, does not, as such, admit of being made the subject of psycho-physical researches. The attempt to deal with this subject psycho-physically only leads to a tedious and meaningless repetition of the phrases and state- ments which the psychology of consciousness correctly employs ; but nothing is made the clearer by repeating words that are only applicable to psychical phenomena in connection with conjectures concerning related physical phenomena. " For all the higher spiritual faculties," says Lotze, 1 " which consist in judgment of the relations of given conceptions, we neither know how empirically to 1 Outlines of Psychology, p. 141 f. HIGHER SPIRITUAL FACULTIES. 559 demonstrate a definite bodily organ, nor should we know how to conceive precisely what, that is of any use, such an organ could contribute toward the solution of the most essential part of the problem that is, the pronouncing of the judgment itself. It is conceivable, on the other hand, that these higher activities might presuppose the complete and clear representation of the content about which the judgment is to be passed, and, consequently, also the undisturbed function of those organs which contribute, first, to perception by the senses ; then to its reproduction and combina- tion with other perceptions ; and, finally, to the appropriate attach- ment of feelings of value to each of them." CHAPTEE XL CERTAIN STATICAL RELATIONS OF THE BODY AND MENTAL PHENOMENA. 1. THE intimate relation between the constitution and func- tional changes of the bodily structure, on the one hand, and the character and course of the phenomena of consciousness, on the other hand, is most easily made obvious by such alterations of ex- perience as are connected with the use of the organs of sensation and motion. These alterations are usually sudden. Where, on the contrary, the relation of body and mind is stationary, or subject to only very slow changes, it is far less obvious ; it may be, indeed, completely hidden from our observation. The relation is not for this reason, however, any the less certain and profoundly influential. Indeed, it is just those physical conditions which are part of the unchanging equipment of our lives that most surety, though most stealthily, determine the development of conscious experience. These are the influences of whose very existence we are for the most part unaware, and over the effect of which we have compara- tively little or no control. Within certain limits, one can deter- mine the character and number of the excitations that fall upon the end-organs of sense, and the resulting changes in the movable parts of the body ; one can also regulate to some extent the suc- cession of images of memory and fancy, and so the character and intensity of the feelings and emotions that possess the field of con- sciousness. But one cannot determine one's own age, or sex, or race, including parentage and prenatal and infantile environment ; nor can one choose one's temperament. Yet how pervasive, mighty, and enduring are the unobserved influences that flow into the conscious life of the individual from age, sex, race, and tempera- ment! The bearing of the foregoing remarks might be enforced by many illustrations. No one is in need of technical information to assure him that the character of his consciousness is every instant dependent upon whether his eyes are closed or open. That we hear with the ear, feel both the roughness and smoothness and NATURE OF POPULAR IMPRESSION. 561 also the heat and coolness of objects with the skin, taste with the mouth, and smell with the nose are matters of experience belonging to each moment of our work-a-day life. The pleasures and pains of sense irresistibly demonstrate the dependence of our mental states upon the condition of the body. Other common experiences, although not arresting attention in the same obtrusive fashion, nevertheless tend to confirm the same impression. The disturb- ances of consciousness which follow the altered bodily condition of sleep are too much an affair of daily experience wholly to escape attention. The question, Why are dreams so queer ? taken in con- nection with our observation of the abnormal state of the sleeper's body, is necessarily answered in a way further to emphasize the general relation between bodily and mental states. Almost every- one has also particular times of experience when he is forced into the admission that the physical system is to be blamed for the altered conditions of his mental life. The loss of a night's rest renders attention to work impossible on the following day ; a slight fever sets the train of memory's images and fancy's creations into accelerated and altered movement, or throws it into wild con- fusion ; a settled melancholy comes as the obvious result of chronic dyspepsia. In these ways the popular impression that the body dominates the mind, and that bodily conditions determine our feelings and thoughts, is strongly corroborated. But other phenomena constantly tend to confirm the other popu- lar impression, that the mind dominates the body and makes it the servant of its feelings and thoughts. In the ordinary estimate, all performance of physical work by the body, when accompanied by the feeling of effort, is an indisputable proof of the immediate in- fluence of the mind over the body. It is even more than this ; it is a proof that the conscious self, the ego, is a source of physical energy, which pours forth, as it were, into the limbs and braces them to the appointed task. The thought of the aged but vig- orous French philosopher, who insisted upon remarking how well he carried his legs, rather than upon how well they carried him, accords accurately with the popular impression. All the cus- tomary language about looking, listening, recalling, etc., as dis- tinguished from mere seeing, hearing, and happening to remem- ber, also enforces the same impression. The average man or woman, whose life is one of constant toil, is led to say with about equal frequency" My limbs are tired, and / must stop trying," or " 7 am tired, but my limbs must be made to go on with their work." Other phenomena of an abnormal kind tend to confirm still fur- 36 562 GENERAL BODILY DIFFERENCES. ther the above-mentioned vague popular impression. Among them may be mentioned the wonderful cases of so-called diseases of mem- ory or of will, and of double personality or other alienations from normal self-consciousness. In such cases strange alterations of the modes of the mind's behavior alterations which appear to involve the suspension or reversal of some of those mental laws and activi- ties which we are accustomed to consider among the most funda- mental seem to be connected with certain alterations of the bodily organs. The effect of certain drugs, through the body, upon the feelings and mental train gives other occasions for insisting upon the dependence of the phenomena of consciousness upon the state of the body. On the other hand, hallucination, hypnotism, and the yet more obscure phenomena of so-called " mind-reading," as well as all the phenomena to which modern Spiritualism appeals, pre- sent the question to us afresh from a somewhat different point of view. 2. It requires more reflection upon wider experience to origi- nate and confirm the impression that all the characteristic experi- ences of the individual are built upon a solid and enduring basis of common relations which universally maintain themselves between cer- tain types of physical constitution and activity and certain correspond- ing types of the character and action of the mind. The development of the child is ordinarily regarded, whether from the physical or the psychical point of view, in an isolated and disconnected wa} r . It is perhaps noted that he has grown so much taller or heavier, or that certain external features of the body are becoming relatively more pronounced ; it is also noted that he is learning to walk, to talk, to take an interest in certain things before unnoticed, and to remem- ber what he has been taught. But the close relations between the bodily changes of advancing years and the mental development of the child are not (at least until the age of puberty is reached) apt to be made the subject of careful observation. In somewhat the same way does ordinary reflection deal with the question as to any relation between the physical and the mental peculiarities of the sexes. It is common enough to note that boys and girls do not, even in selecting and conducting their plays, act precisely alike. That the former are, as a rule, taller, heavier, coarser, than the lat- ter is patent to all observers. But that the absolute and relative development of all the organs of the male and female is different, and that certain sexual peculiarities of perception, feeling, thought, and action are constantly related to this difference, is something which, few if they even suspect it take any pains accurately to remark or describe. Moreover, while almost all agree that the psy- NATURE OF POPULAR IMPRESSION. 563 chical life of the adult male and female is distinguished by sexual peculiarities, there is the widest diversity of opinion as to the pre- cise nature and range of these peculiarities. When the inquiry concerns characteristics of both mind and body belonging to race and ancestry, the answers given by different observers seem to lose all claim to strictly scientific quality. The Frenchman does not describe himself as the Englishman describes him ; and neither one of the two can be expected to agree with the Russian as to what are the peculiarities that characterize this last type of the human species. The history of the discussion regard- ing the kinds and significance of so-called "temperaments," and even regarding the very existence of temperament, shows clearly how uncertain is this entire field of research. Perhaps the most remarkable instance of firm conviction con- cerning the general fact that intimate relations exist between mind and- body, accompanied by the utmost vagueness concerning the precise nature of the basis of such relations, may be derived from the ordinary views as to heredity. It is constantly being remarked of children that they resemble some one of their ancestors in one or more physical characteristics. But this remark is scarcely more frequent than the corresponding one with respect to mental con- stitution or mental idiosyncrasies. Of course the obvious implication is, that we are to look to the laws of heredity for an account of the origin of both classes of qualities ; in other words, both physical and mental qualities are regarded as inherited. Further than this ad- mission ordinary reflection upon experience with facts of this order does not lead most men. It is obvious, however, that even the loose popular impression must be explained, if at all, by insisting upon much more numerous and intimate relations between body and mind than the impression would seem at first to imply. For how can ancestral characteristics be transmitted, unless they are potentially carried over in those living cells from the two parents which actually fuse together in the production of the new life ; or else are also due to the prenatal conditions that control the nutri- tion of the infant's body before it separates from the body of its maternal ancestor ? But to admit this is to insist upon the pro- foundest connection between the molecular structure and dynam- ical associations of the elements of the physical organism and the development of conscious life. It is even to insist upon the mysterious fact that the character of the conscious life is deter- mined in no small degree by the statical peculiarities of the or- ganism. 3. In general, it may be said, then, that while no doubt exists 564 GENERAL BODILY DIFFERENCES. in the popular impression as to the dependence of the mental life upon the age, sexual differences, and inherited ancestral qualities of the bodily organism, the greatest uncertainty and vagueness exist as to the nature and extent of such dependence. When this kind of inquiries is brought to the tests of science, it is found that all the evidence confirms the positive part of the ordinary impression ; but it cannot be said that any substitute for the uncertainty and indefiniteness of the popular estimate has yet been found. The reasons for this failure lie in the very nature of the subject. No guidance by the immediate evidence of consciousness is possible in determining the nature of this class of psychical phenomena. What it is to will, to remember, or to reason, each one trusts him- self to know as a matter of his own inner experience. But the in- quiries, How are the mental peculiarities of the different ages, or of the two sexes, to be distinguished from each other ? or, How does a person of this or that race or temperament think, feel, and act differently from a person of another race or temperament ? are plainly not subjects for an appeal to consciousness. Few questions can be raised, for example, about which a wider diversity of view is likely to be evoked, than the question as to how man and woman differ mentally. Yet this question must be answered, if we are to have an answer to the further inquiry concerning the correlations between sexual differences of organism and sexual mental differ- ences. The difficulty of simply getting at the anatomical and physio- logical facts necessary for an induction is scarcely less unmanage- able. A great amount of careful measurement and a vast array of statistics are necessary even to tell how human beings differ in the most external features, at different ages and as between the two sexes. Certain data with respect to the height, weight, relative size of the different external members of the body, and of the brain, are obtainable ; but other data equally desirable are as yet unattainable. Concerning the nature of the physical basis of temperament and of personal idiosyncrasies we are wholly in the dark. There are therefore many gaps and deficiencies in both the physical and the psychical series. But where the members of both of any two series to be compared are in this condition, the laws of their relation cannot be pointed out. Nothing remains, then, but to guide ourselves as best we may by general observation of the psychical facts, and by use of such few statistical results as are available. On few points will precise conclusions be found attain- able. But the one conclusion of greatest value concerns the main THE PHASES OF LIFE. 565 point called in question and this is the general fact of the corre- lated action of the bodily organism and the mind as the subject of the phenomena of consciousness. 4. Certain facts of general import, concerning the height, weight, comparative growth of the members, size of the brain and organs of sense, etc., which characterize the different Phases of Life may be relied on with considerable confidence. The struct- ural and physiological development of the prenatal human being has been investigated with more or less success by embryology (comp. Part I., chap. VI.) ; but scarcely any trustworthy data exist for a comparative psychology of the fcetus. It cannot be held that its sentient life keeps even pace with the formation and growth of its bodily organs not even of those which, like the brain and the end-organs of sense, are most intimately connected with the phe- nomena of consciousness. 1 Large or elaborate structures, such as the lungs, the eyes, the ears, etc., are formed under morphological conditions and influences with which we are only very imperfectly acquainted, without any corresponding psychical development. The brain at birth is apparently little different from the same organ a few weeks later ; but at this later period an important psychical advance has been made through the activity of the end- organs of sense. This psychical advance must be represented in the cerebral areas by the formation of such molecular changes and dynamical associations of the nervous elements as constitute the physical basis of memory considered as a retentive and reproduc- tive power. It is a reasonable conjecture that the psychical life of the un- born child consists wholly of sensations of pressure and temperature, for the most part exceedingly transient and disconnected, occa- sioned by the stimulus of its changing conditions and positions in the womb of the mother. Such a low grade of mental experience if, indeed, we are to speak of prenatal "consciousness" can as little be accurately represented by any conscious state of the hu- man adult as can the experience of the animals to which the struct-, ure and functions of the body of the foetus, in succession, bear more or less of resemblance. About such a matter it is safest to refuse to speculate. About one principle, however, there can be little doubt many of those structural and physiological factors which form the most important and intimate foundation for the spiritual functions are secured only indirectly in the central organs through the culti- vation given to these organs by the use of the end-organs of sense. 1 Comp. the article of A. W. Volkmann, in Wagner's Handworterb. , L, p. 563 ; and the strictures of Lotze upon it, Medicin, Psychologie, p. 546 f. 566 GENERAL BODILY DIFFERENCES. According to Soltmann' and others, stimulation of the cerebral areas, considered as " motor " by Hitzig, in new-born animals, does not produce the usual localized movements (comp. chap. II., 5 f.). The use of his hand by the child, the use of his organs of speech, etc., educates his brain. So that the dependence of mind on brain is not whether with respect to the life before or after birth merely direct and simple, but also indirect and com- plex. 5. Chaussier considered that the growth of the foetus in length for the six months preceding birth is regular, and that it averages about 54 mm. a month. The mean height at birth of 100 infants of both sexes, measured in Brussels, was found to be 0.501 m. for the boys, 0.491 for the girls, 2 or about 19} and 19^- inches respec- tively. The most rapid growth of the child takes place in the first year after birth ; this amounts to an average of about 2 dcm. (7.87 in.). The growth of the second year is about half of that of the first year ; that of the third year about one-fourth. From the fourth or fifth year until the age of puberty the annual increase of height is nearly regular, and amounts to some 56 mm. During or shortly before this period a sudden rise in the curve of growth occurs ; but after this period the rate continues to diminish until the age of about twenty-five, when the full height may be regarded as attained. In most cases, however, a slight increase takes place between this age and fifty, after which a decrease goes on espe- cially in extreme old age. The average height attained by the human being is an effect of race, of climate, of conditions of liv- ing and work, etc. For nine hundred persons, measured in Brus- sels, ranging from nineteen to thirty years of age, the mean was 1.6648-1.6841 m. 3 The average height of eighty students, at Cam- bridge, was 1.768 m. To express the facts by 'the fraction of the whole height previously attained which the growth of each year amounts to for the first year it is about f ; for the second, \ ; for the third, -f s ; for the fourth, -^ ; for the fifth, -fa ; for the sixth, -jig- ; etc. 6. The weight of the newly born infant is said by Quetelet, 4 as a rule, to remain about stationary, or even to diminish a little, for some seven days after birth ; it then, like the height, grows with its maximum rapidity during the first year of life. Like the height, also, the weight at birth varies according to parentage, prenatal 1 Centrblt. Med. Wiss., 1875, p. 209. * See Quetelet, Physique Sociale de 1'Homme, II., p. 13 f. Paris, 1869. 3 See Quetelet, Ibid., II., p. 19. 4 Ibid., II., p. 81 f. PROPORTIONATE SIZE OF ORGANS. 567 conditions as respects nutrition, etc. The average weight of 119 infants weighed at birth, in Brussels, was found to be 3.055 kilo., or 6.735+ Ibs. avoirdupois. With this the number 3.059 kilo., given in the " Dictionnaire des Sciences medicales," agrees very closely. A year after birth infants of both sexes have, on the aver- age, tripled their weight. Six years more are necessary to double the weight attained at the end of the first year ; and thirteen more to quadruple it. At about the age of nineteen the mean weight of both sexes is nearly that of old age. The maximum weight of the male is attained, as a rule, about forty ; that of the female, somewhat later. At this time the weight is about twenty times that of the infant at birth. At sixty the weight, like the height, begins to di- minish. Quetelet ' has attempted to establish the empirical law that, during the period of development, the square of the weight at different ages is, on the average, as the fifth power of the height ; while for fully developed individuals of both sexes the weight is as the square of the height. 7. The proportions which exist among the different organs and members of the human body are of interest in this connection. These proportions vary greatly for the different ages of life, but remain nearly the same for all individuals (not obviously deformed) of the same age. The parts least subject to any departure from the normal type are the most essential parts. The height of the head at birth is about one-half that attained on complete devel- opment or an average of about 111 mm. (4.37 in.). It attains about 154 mm. by the end of the first year, and 173 by the end of the second ; its growth of the first two years (62 mm.) is, there- fore, more than all the subsequent growth up to complete develop- ment (when it is, on the average, 228 mm.). The developed head is about -J- to of the height of the entire body. The back of the in- fant, however, has at birth only about J its subsequent length ; the arm, J- ; the leg, up to the place of bifurcation, only about |. 2 The foot of the infant (which will probably never afterward appear in its natural form and proportions) is about -\ of the length of the body. This member has naturally, for all ages and both sexes, about the same length as the head. The hand is about -J- of the length of the entire body. Unlike the head, the limbs grow rapidly after the second year ; especially are they lengthened at the ex- pense of their transverse dimensions at the age of puberty, when the bony framework is outstripping the muscles, as it were. The 1 Physique Sociale, II., p. 92 f. 2 See Quetelet, Anthropometrie, ou Mesure des Differentes Facultes de 1'Homme, pp. 45 f., 1941 568 GENERAL BODILY DIFFERENCES. following table ' shows the relative weight of several internal or- gans in the infant at birth and in the adult : Organ. Percentage of body-weight. Eatio of the two, the infant taken asl. Infant at birth. Adult. Skeleton 16.70 23.40 2.16 .89 11.30 .28 14.34 15.35 43.10 2.01 .52 6.30 .028 2.37 26 28 20 15 12 1.7 3.7 Heart Skin Eye Brain 8. A survey of the physical changes which take place in de- pendence upon the age of the human being shows that most of them are only indirectly connected with the development of the mind. The connection is, however, scarcely less strongly marked and important on that account. The changing size and weight of different members of the body, both absolutely and relatively, gives conditions to the life of sensation and motion ; and it is by act- ual use of these members in sensation and motion that the de- velopment of the mental powers of discernment, memory, and will takes place, and all the knowledge of the spatial qualities and re- lations of things is acquired. The metabolic activities of the infant are much more pronounced than are those of the adult ; and much of this metabolism is directed toward the ends of construction. To make the rapid growths of the first years, a great amount of food, representing a great amount of potential energy, must be converted into living tissue. More rapid metabolism is also demanded by the necessity of keeping up the normal temperature of the infant's body, which is slightly warmer (.3) than the body of the adult, and which loses heat much faster on account of its extremely vascular skin. The heart of the infant is, relatively to its body- weight (see table above), considerably larger than that of the adult, and the whole circuit of the circulatory system is traversed much quicker (in about 12 seconds, instead of 22). Accordingly, the heart- beat is more frequent namely, about 130-140 per minute, falling off to about 110 in the second year and to about 90 in the tenth year. The respiration is also more frequent it being about 35 per minute at first, 28 in the second year, and 26 in the fifth. The brain and organs of sense are relatively very much larger in the 6 See Vierordt, Grundriss d. Physiologie (5th ed.), p. 605. SENSES OF THE INFANT. infant than in the adult, and accordingly grow less rapidly in early life. Everything in the infant indicates, therefore, a mobile, flexible, changeable condition of the bodily organs, with a relatively large development of the most important parts of the nervous mechanism. Such a condition is significant of a paucity of bodily and mental habits ; the lines of the habitual action of the mechanism, the character and number of the dynamical associations among its elements, have not yet been rigidly marked out and firmly fixed as they subsequently are. But the advanced development of the brain and end-organs of sense is significant of the potentialities, as it were, rather than of the actual experience of the babe. There is difficulty in tracing accurately the course of the earliest mental de- velopment, if by " mental " we intend to designate the phenomena of consciousness. The eyes of the child during the first days of its life are seldom open for any length of time. Preyer 1 asserts that some newly born children move the eyes with associated and co- ordinated movements, others not ; but there is no fixation of eyes such as indicates an act of will in attentive regard until much later, and then in such way as to show a gradual unfolding of the power of attention. All newly born children are deaf ; the temporary deafness is caused by lack of air in the tympanum previous to respiration. Great individual differences exist as respects the age at which children give unmistakable tokens of having sensations of sound. It was not until the first half of the fourth day that one investigator w r as satisfied his child could hear. From the conditions under which the foetus grows we might suppose that the sense of touch, as re- gards both pressure and temperature, would be well developed in the infant. The reflex excitability of the different regions of its skin is, however, inferior to that of the adult, and only gradually approaches it under the influence of constant cultivation. Accord- ing to Preyer, 9 it is highly probable that the sensations of sweet, salt, sour, and bitter are distinguishable from birth. Taste may then be said to be "instinctive" with it as with other young ani- mals. There is more doubt about sensations of smell ; according to some these are not experienced earlier than from four to eight weeks, but according to others they belong to the first days of the child's life. It is, of course, largely in connection with the unfolding of the activity of these organs of sensation and motion that its en- tire mental development takes place. 9. After full maturity has been attained, and the period of 1 Die Seele d. Kindes, p. 25 f. Leipzig, 1882. 2 Ibid., p. 76. 570 GENERAL BODILY DIFFERENCES. decline for the bodily powers has begun, the mental powers also are, as a rule, less aggressive and acquisitive, or even begin to de- cline. But the period of the more immediate dependence of the latter upon the sensory and motor activities of the bodily organs has passed ; the lines of spiritual as well as of corporal habit have become firmly drawn, and both mechanism and mind may be said to contain a great amount of stored experience ; judgment is trained, and less liable to sudden action under the assaults of vari- ous forms of impulse. If, then, no sudden accident or slow decay impairs the cerebral centres, the fullest and most impressive ma- turity of the mental powers may arrive and continue years after the activities of sense and motion are past their prime. 10. That the two sexes differ in many ways, as respects both physical and mental characteristics, is an almost universal im- pression. As to what are the mental characteristics of either sex a wide difference of opinion undoubtedly prevails. But the sta- tistics of certain physical characteristics of the sexes are tolerably complete. Besides the more obvious bodily differences of man and woman, the two sexes differ from birth in average height, weight, physical energy, proportion of parts, relative development of or- gans, frequency of pulse, respiration, etc. They also differ in many other subtler and less obvious characteristics. As we have already seen (p. 566), the height of the male infant at birth slightly (about 0.01 m.) exceeds that of the female. The excess increases, but not with perfect regularity, until full maturity is reached. At this time the height of the man may be given as 1.467-1.890 m. (about 4 ft. 11 in. to 6 ft. 4 in.) ; that of the woman, 1.444-1.740 m. (about 4 ft. 10 in. to 5 ft. 10 in.). The curve of the growth of the two sexes from birth onward runs somewhat differently ; although up to the age of four or five the difference is scarcely perceptible. All the sexual differences are, of course, least pronounced in the earliest years of life. For these years the proportions of height remain about as 1 to 0.988 ; at complete development they are as 1 to 0.937, or about as 16 to 15. But at sixteen or seventeen years of age the growth of girls is relatively as far advanced as is that of boys at eighteen or nineteen. Between five and fifteen years the former make an annual growth of about 56 mm., the latter of about 52 mm. 1 11. The relative weight of the two sexes varies in somewhat the same manner, but not precisely, as their height. Of 119 infants weighed at birth, in Brussels (63 males and 56 females), the average weight of the males was 3.20 kilo. (7.05 Ibs. avoirdupois) ; of the latter, 2.91 kilo. (6.42 Ibs.). At the same age the male is, as a rule, 1 See Quetelet, Physique Sociale, II., p. 15 f. ; and Anthropomctrie, p. 176 f. GROWTH OF SEXUAL DIFFERENCES. 571 heavier than the female ; but although the boy is born heavier, and in his earliest years makes a larger gain of weight, at about twelve the two sexes have nearly the same average weight. The limits of weight for persons normally formed are about 49.1- 98.5 kilo. (108-217 Ibs.) for man, 39.8-93.8 kilo. (98-207 Ibs.) for woman. Woman attains her maximum weight several years later than man. The relative proportion of the bodily parts is different for the two sexes. At about the age of four or five the sexual differences in this regard become more observable. The bony framework of the boy is relatively prominent, and the outlines of the limbs become more clearly traced in a way to conform to agile and strong move- ment. Soundness of limbs and amplitude of flesh concealing the framework are more characteristic of the girl. At the age of puberty these and other similar differences suddenly become more strongly marked. Careful measurement of many individuals who have at- tained the development of the adult shows certain noteworthy stati- cal differences of sex. The head, which is contained about 7.4 times in the entire height of the man, is contained only 7. 2 times in th^height of the woman ; it is, then, relatively a little longer in the latp. The chest of the adult male is more developed. The length of the arms stretched out is about 1.045 of his height ; of the female, only 1.015. The relative length of the legs is greater in the man. The circumferences of the different parts of the body are also rela- tively different in the two sexes. The relative step is as 1,000 to 1,157; and the weight of the brain as about 1,272 to 1,424 (see chap. L, 4). There are also marked differences between the sexes in the forma- tion of the pelvis, and in the part of the body on which the centre of the line of length of the entire body falls. The costal mechan- ism of respiration differs. The girl of five breathes with her ribs as does the adult woman. The pulse of woman is quicker in about the same proportion as her height is less. The physical energy of which the male is capable, whether as measured by lifting weights, by pressure with the hands, or other ways of producing a meas- urable mechanical effect, is much greater than that of the female. This follows, of course, from his larger brain and skeleton, and from his superior equipment of muscles. Before puberty the dif- ference has been estimated as expressed by the ratio 3:2; after that age it is greater, and is measured by the figures 9 : 5, or is perhaps double. The average boy of nine or ten can support his own weight for some time with his hands ; the girl cannot. The average man can, by using his disposable energy, lift some 154 572 GENERAL BODILY DIFFERENCES. kilo. ; the woman scarcely half as much. 1 The metabolism of the female, whether measured by respiratory or other excreta, is not only absolutely, but relatively less ; her blood is not only less in quantity, but also of lighter specific gravity, and contains fewer red corpuscles. 2 The woman is more inclined than the man to be "hy- per aesthetic " (in the physiological meaning of the word) ; this in- volves a tendency to many forms of cramping of the muscles, to sud- den secretions, to the wide spreading of stimulation so as to involve a considerable number of the bodily parts. 3 Many of the woman's sensations are less sharply discerned as to their qualitative content, but stir up accompanying forms of feeling with more energy. 12. In the description of those mental characteristics of sex which undoubtedly exist, and which are dependent upon or con- nected with the foregoing physical characteristics, a great diversity of view prevails. We cannot enter into the details of the discus- sion. It is plain, however, that the greater bulk of those nervous and muscular masses which are involved in the conscious life of sensation and motion both implies and necessitates great differ- ences in the development of this life. But judgment and decision are also involved in the conscious life of sensation and motion ; they are dependent upon that life for the amount, direction, and lower or higher order of their development. The superior strength of the chest, shoulders, and hips of the male, in lifting and moving heavy burdens, and the fitness of body and legs for walking firmly and running swiftly, cannot fail to produce a marked consciousness of ease, elasticity, and security, both of posture and of movement. Other important sexual differences, consisting of variations in the kind and amount of feeling sensuous, aesthetic, intellectual, moral and especially of the so-called emotions, are undoubtedly connected with the existence and development of those organs specifically characteristic of sex. The differences in circulation, respiration, metabolism, etc., are also the cause of characteristic differences in sentiment and feeling. Especially important, and even determinative, is the man's larger mass of nervous matter in the cerebral centres. In active energy, whether as given out on sudden call or in the form of sustained endurance of the strain of labor, and in all pursuits and achievements requiring such energy, the woman (however much she may seem to be superior in the passive endurance of pain, etc.) can never compete successfully with the man. 1 Quetelet, Anthropometrie, p. 359 f. 8 Foster, Text-book of Physiology, p. 713. 3 Lotze, Medicin. Psychologic, p. 559 f. SEXUAL MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 573 Other mental differences closely related to the more obvious ones, and largely dependent upon them, are less obvious and easy to demonstrate. Our purpose will be served sufficiently by citing, concerning such differences, a few points from Lotze, 1 who has treated the whole subject briefly, but with much insight and caution. In Lotze's opinion, woman naturally adapts herself more easily to new conditions of life ; while acquired habits have a stronger hold on man. Her characteristics involve a mixture of the sanguine temperament and the sentimental stage ; while varieties of educa- tion conceal more of native qualities. This would seem to imply a greater molecular immobility and stronger dynamical associations among the elements of man's organism. The intellectual capacity of the sexes, Lotze thinks, differs chiefly or solely in so far as special emotional interests prescribe the course of the intellectual life. It is characteristic of masculine philosophy to analyze strik- ing phenomena ; it is characteristic of woman rather to hate analy- sis. Masculine thought depends upon the conviction that whatever is most great and beautiful in the world has its mechanical con- ditions ; masculine effort upon a profound reverence for general principles. The faith of woman is that no general principle or form has an independent value, but that this value belongs to the living reality founded upon such principle ; the sentiment of the feminine mind is devout toward completeness. The notions of the two as to spatial and mathematical relations, and their perceptions as to the nature of the concrete realizations of the ideas of space and time, are markedly different. In seeking for some physical basis for these and similar differences in case their existence be once as- sumed we are forced to admit that any such known basis can be at best only indirectly related to the differences themselves. The general truth holds, however, that certain intellectual differences are intimately, and even necessarily, connected with certain emo- tional differences ; and that the latter plainly have, in many cases, their ground in the organic differences of the two sexes. 13. The different intellectual and emotional characteristics of the different races, and the relations of such characteristics to defi- nite variations of the bodily type of each race from that of our com- mon humanity cannot be discussed without raising even more obscure and doubtful inquiries. If external influences of soil, cli- mate, food-supply, character of the prevalent civilization, etc., have any observable influence upon the type of the bodily form and of this there can scarcely be a doubt and if the laws of heredity are to be allowed the scope and influence which belongs to them, the 1 Microcosmus, ii., p. 39 f. Edinburgh, 1885. 574 DOCTRINE OF TEMPERAMENTS. existence of both physical and mental characteristics of race must be admitted. The popular impression confirms the assumption of anthropological science. But there are few subjects concerning which statistics and impressions are both more incomplete and more unsatisfactory. According to Quetelet's conclusions, the proportions of the aver- age human body are such as to render it the type of manly beauty ; and the limits of these proportions are the more fixed and un- changeable the nearer we approach to perfection. In the special features of height, weight, and relative form, rather than size of the organs, certain differences appear which belong to different peoples and races. Each people may be said to have its peculiar type ; and among each people such type exists, not only in fact and determinable by scientific means, but as vaguely established in the general appreciation. According to Quetelet, 1 the principal pro- portions of the human figure vary very little among different races of men. " The real differences which the races present appertain to characteristics which the eye seizes better than the compasses ; in order to establish them firmly, an appreciation of minute differ- ences is required, and a tact that presupposes a long experience in such researches. One can see the difficulties with which phrenolo- gists meet in making numerical estimates of the characteristics of the skull ; nothing precise can be formulated in this regard " (comp. chap. II., 4). This conclusion of Quetelet is formulated in view of careful measurement, not only of many individuals from the modern European peoples, and of certain selected cases among the North American Indians, the Chinese, and the Kaffirs, but also of Egyp- tian mummies, of Greek statues, and of other means for ascertain- ing the proportions of. ancient man. 14. Few impressions are more firmly fixed than this, that dif- ferent individuals (at least among all the more highly civilized peoples) possess, each one, a characteristic "natural disposition." Such disposition constitutes a predominating tendency to feel, think, and act in certain forms rather than others among the many that are conceivable. The conviction that the disposition of the individual is innate and inherited, rather than the result of training or environment, is doubtless due to the fact that it appears with considerable strength in childhood, and generally maintains itself under great alterations of circumstances, and against effort, to the close of the individual's life. The so-called " disposition " can, in- deed, be greatly modified, and even seem wholly changed ; but such modification is invariably made at the expense of greater energy 1 Anthropometrie, p. 323. THE THEORY OF DR. GEORGE. 575 than is required to form and break those habits which are acquired differently in different individuals after birth. Moreover, the modification is often one of expression and power of Qontrol rather than of disposition. Patent facts like the foregoing have given rise to the theory of Temperaments. Curiously enough, the number four has usually been chosen as sufficient to designate the kinds or types of native disposition, the varieties of temperament. The attempt has also often been made to connect the different temperaments with a bodily basis. As in several of the foregoing inquiries, so in this, our reliance is mainly placed upon the correctness of certain wide- spread but vague impressions. It is impossible to classify the tem- peraments with the use of methods required by strict scientific in- duction. The individual can judge of his own temperament only by remembering his actions and the states of consciousness con- nected with them. But upon such a point memory, and even the immediate recognition of consciousness, are but little trustworthy. Few things are more common than for the individual quite to mis- conceive and misinterpret his own mental states and tendencies. On the other hand, we have no means of judging the temperament of others except by their action using the word action in its broadest signification. A large part of such judgment is unavoid- ably rnisjudgnient. But notwithstanding all the doubts and un- certainties which attach themselves to the subject of temperaments, those who are carefully observant of their fellows will continue to believe that important and determining natural differences exist among them. 15. Some of the older treatises on psychology contained elab- orate discussions of the doctrine of temperament, in which many well-observed facts and shrewd conjectures were united with no little fanciful speculation. This is to some extent true of the treat- ment (on the whole admirable) given to the subject, for example, by Dr. Leopold George. ' According to Dr. George, the four tem- peraments are defined by the nature of the interior relation which exists between perception and the affections of the mind. Thus the greater the mind's wakefulness to impressions, the greater is also its susceptibility to the feelings of pleasure or pain which are attached to the impressions. The " sanguine " temperament is distinguished by strength in this interior relation. But the greater the attention given to the objects before the mind, the greater are the emotions of hope or fearful expectation which the objects excite ; and from the emphasis being laid, as it were, on this relation the 1 Lehrbuch d. Psychologie, pp. 125-151. Berlin, 1854. 576 DOCTRINE OF TEMPERAMENTS. " melancholic " temperament results. A large degree of suscepti- bility to sensation is naturally accompanied by feelings of attrac- tion or dread toward the object of sensation. This fact forms a basis for the " choleric " temperament. And, finally, the so-called "phlegmatic" temperament depends upon the degree of mental apprehension with which different objects are seized, and the con- sequent emotions of satisfaction or disgust. The theory is then developed that different races and peoples are distinguished by some one of these four temperaments for example, the French are sanguine, the English melancholic, the Spanish and Italians choleric, the Germans phlegmatic. More generally still, the Cau- casian race is sanguine, the Mongolian melancholic, the Negro phlegmatic, the Malayan choleric. The four periods of life cor- respond to the four temperaments, according to Dr. George ; and this opinion has undoubtedly a certain basis in fact, as well as a suggestion concerning the nature of the physical conditions which may possibly underlie the existence of temperaments. Even dif- ferent species of animals are, in the opinion of this writer, charac- terized by predominance of one of these four great types. 16. Modern psychology, approaching the subject of temperament from the physiological and biological points of view, is more likely to be self-restrained and cautious in its conclusions. According to Wundt, 1 the fourfold division of the temperaments is correct, be- cause, in the case of every individual, there must be a certain com- bination of the two factors of strength and speed in all change which goes on in the mental movements. The various affections of the mind are therefore classifiable as either strong and quick or strong and slow, or else as weak and quick or weak and slow. Choleric and melancholic persons are inclined to strong affections, sanguine and phlegmatic to those that are weak. By crossing these two principles of division the following scheme is derived : Strong. Weak. Quick Choleric Sanguine. Slow Melancholic Phlegmatic. The quick temperaments are directed rather toward the present, the slow toward the future. The quick require additional strength, and the weak additional time, in order to achieve the largest amount of work possible for them. The choleric and phlegmatic are temperaments of action rather ; while the sanguine and melan- cholic are temperaments of feeling. Wundt agrees with the observations of Dr. George respecting 1 Physiologische Psychologic, ii. , p. 345 f . THE THEOEY OF LOTZE. 577 the applicability of the conception of temperament to orders, fam- ilies, and species of other animals as well as to man. He also makes the penetrating observations that Pessimism generally rests upon an individual peculiarity of temperament ; and that the true art of life consists in not having one temperament, but in combining them all. " One should be sanguine amid the petty sufferings and joys of daily life, melancholy in the more serious hours of life's more important events, choleric toward impressions- that fetter one's profounder interests, phlegmatic in the execution of the re- solves that have been reached." Lotze's 1 treatment of the doctrine of temperaments is more ex- tended than Wundt's, but no less cautious and suggestive. Va- rieties of temperament, as of all other innate natural capacities, appear to be most marked under the conditions of an advanced civilization. By the term "temperaments," according to Lotze, we understand : " (1) The differences, in kind and degree, of excitability for external impressions ; (2) the greater or less extent to which the ideas excited reproduce others ; (3) the rapidity with which the ideas vary ; (4) the strength with which feelings of pleasure and pain are associated with them ; (5) finally, the ease with which ex- ternal actions associate with these inner states themselves." The ancient fourfold division of temperaments is approved by Lotze as, indeed, it must be by all who advocate intelligently any the- ory upon the subject. The sanguine temperament is distinguished by great rapidity of change and lively excitability. This indi- cates a permanent excess of the general capacity for reciprocal ex- citement among all the different psychical states, and an exces- sive sensitiveness of the soul to all external stimuli. It is natural in children and uncivilized tribes ; it is, on the whole, advantageous to the beginnings of culture, and prevents the establishment of narrow notions and attachment to ideas acquired accidentally. But adults who are strongly marked by this temperament make the impression of immaturity, of being " grown-up children." For the temperament usually called "melancholic " Lotze prefers the term sentimental This temperament is distinguished " by special recep- tivity for the feeling of the value of all possible relations," but is indifferent toward bare matter of fact. Here a lively appreciation of the harmonies and discords of surrounding objects may be com- bined with little inclination for hard work ; a great variety of aesthetic feeling, of imaginative activity, may go with theoretical vagueness and the disturbance of an established sense of duty by 1 Miorocosmus, ii. , pp. 24 ff. , Edinburgh, 1885 ; Medicin. Psychologic, 560 f. ; Outlines of Psychology, p. 137. 37 578 DOCTRINE OF TEMPERAMENTS. this aesthetic feeling. The sentimental temperament shows itself in science among those who "spend their ingenuity in constantly de- vising some new dress for the knowledge they have acquired ;" and in art by dealing with " isolated lyric movements of emotion," with- out being capable of grasping them and bringing them together into a coherent whole. It is distinctive of youth and, in its most pleasant form, of those who retain a youthful disposition on into the later and the latest years of life. The marks of the choleric temperament are " one-sided recep- tivity and great energy in single directions." It is therefore dis- tinguished by diminished susceptibility to excitement, but great force and endurance in reaction when feeling has once been aroused. Its fine effect is an apparent moral steadiness of char- acter ; its uncomely effect is obstinate and narrow perseverance in a path once entered upon, even when reasons exist for deviating from or abandoning it. Its time of most natural development is in adult manhood ; but its occurrence in a notable way even among children shows it to be one of the native dispositions of the mind. Finally, the phlegmatic temperament, which is the natural temper of advanced age, is distinguished by slightly varied and slow, but not necessarily weak, reactions. Sluggishness in youth and equa- nimity in old age may both result from the action of this adjust- ment of the feelings and impressions to external stimuli and the train of ideas. 17. The permanent common features of the foregoing views as to the nature of temperament illustrate sufficiently the real truth of the case. The doctrine as a whole is one which in its main principles is undoubtedly required by the most wide and varied observation. On the other hand, the differences in the details with which the different descriptions are filled out show the uncertainties which belong to every attempt to elaborate it. Common impres- sions, producing a common play of feeling and regulating the train of associated ideas, belong to all individuals. But in each individual there is something characteristic as to the mode, the intensity, the speed with which these impressions arise when the stimulus acts, then combine with one another, and so provoke feeling or regulate the ideas. In a more or less definite way, all men generalize the various individual examples and form them into classes which have necessarily lost that variety and minuteness of peculiarities that characterizes the individual and have been conformed to some idea of a type. No real individual perfectly expresses such a typical idea. But especially in those conditions of civilization where the expression of individuality in a varied and impressive way is pos- PHYSICAL BASIS OF TEMPERAMENT. 579 sible most individuals are recognized as conforming more nearly to some one rather than another of these types. 18. As to the exact nature of the physical basis of temperament nothing is known. The influence of abnormal bodily conditions, and of certain diseases, to produce or alter the disposition of the mind in a manner resembling temperament would seem to indicate that the original constitution of the brain is not the principal determining factor. The nature of the excitation which external stimuli produce upon the end-organs of sense, the strength of the resulting reactions in the form of common feeling, the habitual con- dition of the internal and visceral organs and the coloring they impart to common feeling, seem to be of prime importance in de- termining the temperament. Further than this it is difficult to be more specific, even in conjecture. The fact that the different periods of life are apt to be characterized by a predominance of one of the four temperaments is not an argument against the physical nature of the basis of temperament in general. Certain changes in the nature, speed, and strength of the reactions derived from the end- organs and the internal organs of the trunk necessarily accom- pany the early development, riper maturing, and decay of the bod- ily powers. These cannot fail to have a great, though indirect, influence upon the activities of the cerebral centres. But where so much already said is so uncertain, we refrain from adding further conjectures. 19. What has hitherto been developed in detail respecting the relations which maintain themselves between the structure and activity of the nervous mechanism and the phenomena of conscious- ness may now be summarized in somewhat the following way. We seem warranted in insisting that the following five great groups of correlations between body and mind are always maintained during the mind's conscious existence : 1. The quality and intensity of the sense-element in our expe- rience is correlated with the condition of the nervous system as acted on by its appropriate stimuli. That the precise character and amount of our sensations are dependent upon what and how much of various forms of physical energy acts upon the organs of sense there is scarcely need to say. But the phenomena which demonstrate the effect of attention upon the sense-element itself prevent us from regarding the relation as only one-sided and sim- ple. The true state of the case is never represented by considering the sensations as mere passive impressions depending solely upon 580 CORRELATIONS OF MIND AND BODY. the kind and degree of the action which the stimuli exert. These sensations depend also on the condition of the mind at the time the stimulating effect of the excited sensorium is realized in con- sciousness, and in terms of consciousness. To represent the men- tal condition of attention as itself simply and absolutely dependent upon the condition of the centres of the brain is to cover up much of our ignorance concerning the relation of body and mind with a scanty stock of conjecture in cerebral physiology. There are many facts to countenance the reverse statement the condition of the centres of the brain depends upon the state of the mind with re- spect to attention. For the present we content ourselves with this expression : The sense-element in our experience is constantly correlated with the condition of the nervous system as under excite- ment from its appropriate stimuli. 2. The combination, whether simultaneous or successive, of our conscious experiences is correlated with the combination of the im- pressions made, from whatever source, upon the nervous organism- That the number and form of the different sensations composing any presentation of sense is dependent upon the number and qual- ity of the different excitations of the nervous system which com- bine in such presentation there can be no doubt. So, too, does the order and time-rate of the phenomena of consciousness depend upon the order and time-rate of the separate excitations of the nervous system. But no object of sense can be considered merely as a compound of the elements of sensation entering into it ; nor is the nature of the mental product to be derived from the physical laws according to which the different stimulations modify, support, supplement, or inhibit each other. A mental synthesis, an activity that combines under different laws from those which govern the putting together of stimuli of various wave-forms and degrees of intensity, must take place in order that one object of sense may be constructed out of several sense-elements. Again, the order in succession and time-rate of the conscious states is not a mere copy of the order and time-rate of the impressions made upon the ner- vous system. It is simple matter of fact that mental education in the making of those syntheses which take place in all acts of per- ception is necessary in order to see or touch extended " Things," as distinguished from merely having visual and tactile sensations. Whatever special form of activity in the cerebral centres is assumed as the physical basis of this mental act of synthesis, it is by no means certain that such cerebral activity does not as truly depend upon the mental act as the mental act depends upon it. Here again, at any rate, the word " correlation " seems best adapted to CORRELATIONS OF MIND AND BODY. 581 express the connection between the physical basis and the mental phenomena. 3. Those phenomena of consciousness which we designate as " memory " and " recollection" as well as the play of the repro- duced images of representation in general, are correlated with the molecular constitution and tendencies, and with the so-called " dy- namical associations," of the elements of the nervous system. It is not necessary to repeat in this connection what has already been said in proof of the fact that these elements furnish, in part, the necessary conditions of conscious acts of memory ; and, on the other hand, that the enumeration of certain physical conditions throws no light upon what is peculiarly mental in the phenomena. To say that memory depends on the condition of the cerebral centres emphasizes the relations involved in one class of facts ; to say that memory depends upon the conscious act of attention, both to the original object and to its reproduced image, presents the relations involved in another class of facts. 4. The course of thought, and all the higher forms of self-con- scious experience, are correlated ivith the condition of the cerebral centres. The dependence of these conscious mental activities upon the quantity and character of the blood-supply in the brain, and upon the integrity and unimpeded activity of its tissues, cannot be called in question. Of the exact nature of this dependence we can form only a very inadequate picture ; and we have no means what- ever of subjecting this dependence to a rational explanation. But, on the other hand, many of our experiences would just as certainly lead to the conclusion that the condition of the cerebral centres depends upon the higher forms of self-conscious experience. This is true of the results of all our voluntary acts accompanied by conscious discernment and choice of one among several possible courses of action. The facts of which we are sure in such cases are these : An idea of something to be done, an idea of the means (the parts of the body to be moved, and the sensations and feelings of effort which are associated in experience with such movement), a fiat of will, and a result in sensations and perceptions showing that the movement has been accomplished. The actual movement we trace back, under the guidance of physiological facts and laws, to the starting of some form of nerve-commotion in the requisite motor areas of the cerebrum. But unless we stoutly, and from mere prejudice, refuse to acknowledge a possibility of .the mind exercising any influence upon the body, we are warranted in saying that this nerve-commotion in the cerebral motor areas de- pends upon the preceding ideas ending in the fiat of will to exe- 582 COKRELATIONS OF MIND AND BODY. cute a certain form of external motion. At this stage of the discus- sion, however, we prefer to use the vague term " correlation " to in- dicate the mutual connections between phj'sical condition and this class of so-called higher mental phenomena. It has already been made clear that such connections are here much less patent, direct, and susceptible of being stated in the form of general laws than are those of the first two classes. 5. The statical condition of the body (by which we mean all those inherited peculiarities of the organism, the sexual and tribal bodily characteristics, the corporal constitution as dependent upon age, which change only slowly and within narrow limits, or do not change perceptibly at all) and the general tone or coloring of con- scious experience are correlated. Upon this obscure subject we may (at least at present) wisely decline to take either one of two extreme and indefensible positions. It cannot be said to be re- quired by the facts that all the phenomena of consciousness should be regarded as strictly predetermined by the constitution, environ- ment, and independent action of the corporal elements. The really convincing argument for all such thorough-going organ icism is the wish to have it so. At another extreme stands the fanciful philos- ophy which considers the mind as the builder of the body as in some way fashioning to its own inherent constitution and uses the organs of the physical mechanism. This conclusion, also, we must decline to accept without further testing. All the facts, however, do obviously impress upon us the conclusion, how pervasive, inti- mate, varied, and profound are the mutual relations the correla- tions of the physical mechanism and the phenomena of con- sciousness. Any further speculation as to the real nature of this connection, and as to the nature of the subject of the mental phe- nomena of the Mind must be reserved for the succeeding part of our inquiry. PART THIRD. THE NATURE OF THE MIND. CHAPTER I. THE FACULTIES OF THE MIND, AND ITS UNITY. 1. UP to this point in our psycho-physical investigations we have been content to speak of the mind simply as the " subject " of the phenomena of consciousness. In other words, the phenomena of consciousness may with equal propriety be spoken of as mental phenomena ; for they are phenomena of, or appertaining to, what all men indicate by the subject "I" (the ego) when describing their different conscious experiences (comp. p. 31). This indefinite and provisional recognition of the mind as an existence to which differ- ent states, or conditions, or modes of activity, may belong with- out destroying its unity, suffices for a simple description of the constitution and activities of the nervous mechanism, and of the relations between it and the phenomena of consciousness. But psychology, even when pursued from the physiological point of view, can scarcely be satisfied to push its inquiries no farther into the nature of mind. Psychology, from whatever point of view it is pursued, aims to perfect a science of mind. Like every other science, it strives to discover the essential nature of that which it investigates. Pains must indeed be taken to avoid substituting words for things, abstractions for realities. By the " essential nature " of mind we mean just that nature which is duly inferred from the phenomena as essential to their rational explanation. But there are especial and unique reasons why psychology should not will- ingly desist from renewed attempts at such rational explanation. Is the subject of the phenomena of consciousness the so-called Mind entitled to be considered as having unity and reality in any defensible meaning of the words ? Is it not peculiarly entitled to be considered as a real being, with a permanent and essential nature of its own ? It is impossible for human reason not to attach the greatest interest and importance to these ultimate psychological inquiries. A sentient and rational life, without any self interest in the examination of its own permanent characteristics, and of the grounds upon which it rests, would be an absurdity. 586 RELATIONS OF MIND AND BKAIN. 2. Various objections may be raised against allowing considera- tions like the foregoing to apply to the researches of that branch of psychology which is called " physiological." It may be claimed that the rational explanation of the mental phenomena belongs to Meta- physics rather than to Physiological Psychology. To a certain ex- tent the force of such objections must be admitted. They are not of a nature, however, to debar us from the inquiries that are to be raised in the following chapters. On the contrary, the result of the discoveries made by starting from the point of view held by experimental science is such as irresistibly to urge upon us some of these very inquiries. For example, it has been shown beyond doubt that the construction of presentations of sense requires the activity of both body and mind, considered as standing in peculiar relations to each other with respect to the conditions which they furnish for the spatial relations and spatial properties of these pres- entations. But do body and mind themselves exist in spatial re- lations ; and may the latter be spoken of as having spatial prop- erties ? In other words : In what sense can we localize mind in the bod}', or speak of the body as the seat or organ of mind? Moreover, as we observe the two classes of phenomena (the organic and the mental) the impression is inevitable that in some sort they keep pace with each other in the order of development. This fact unavoidably raises an inquiry as to the relation of the mind to the body with respect to its origin and destiny. As a matter of fact, moreover, it is found that those who are most inclined to complain at the introduction of any " metaphysi- cal " inquiries into the discussions of physiological psychology are quite as apt as others to give grounds for the same complaint against themselves. They themselves rarely escape the charge of having a so-called metaphysical theory of the soul to maintain. With such complainants, moreover, it is often from the very begin- ning a foregone conclusion what the general nature of that theory must be. They decry metaphysics and advocate a " psychology without a soul." Yet they hold, as an unalterable but unverifiable assumption, that psychological phenomena must not be so discerned and interpreted as to seem to require for their explanation an ex- istence called " a soul." 3. In order to arrive at any satisfactory conclusions regarding the essential nature of the Mind, it is plainly necessary that we should take our point of starting from a consideration of mental phenomena. For these are the very phenomena for which an ac- count is to be given ; and there is no safe way of concluding what is the nature of any reality, or even of determining whether any YCH< FAULTS OF THE OLD PSYCSlOLOGT. 587 assumed reality actually exists, except by considering the phenom- ena which are attributed to it. The questions, how far mental states and mental changes are explicable by referring them to ante- cedent or concomitant states and changes of states in the nervous system ; and how far such mental states and changes require us to assume the existence of some other real being than the molecules of the brain and spinal cord cannot even be properly approached without a clear knowledge of what these states and changes in themselves are. But the only way to know what mental phenom- ena, as phenomena, in fact are, is through observation of such phe- nomena by the method of introspection. We must then begin this particular part of our general discussion by changing for the time our point of view. Much fault has been found of late with the failures of the so- called "old " psychology. It has often been explained at length that these failures were largely due to its wrong method ; and, as is well known, its method was almost exclusively the method of in- trospection or self-consciousness. The exclusive use of this method resulted in confining the efforts of psychology very largely to the rather barren task of classifying the different kinds of mental activ- ities, and of discussing what so-called " faculties " must be assumed to belong to the mind in order to account for so many kinds of activities. Now, classification of phenomena is certainly one im- portant part of the work of every science ; nor should it be forgot- ten that much of the more recent progress in psychology is due to previous painstaking observations of mental phenomena resulting in their classification from the purely introspective point of view. Classification, however, is not explanation ; and the " faculties " into which the " old psychology " divided the mind were too often mere names that repeated the bare fact of the observer having suc- ceeded, to his own satisfaction, in classifying the phenomena. It is demanded, however, in order to make real progress in psychology as a science, that the correlations, under precise and definite laws, of the mental phenomena with one another and with the events which happen in external nature shall be ascertained. Nevertheless, even after adopting this view of the problem we cannot dispense with the method of introspection ; for we have no other way of ascer- taining what are the phenomena that require explanation. If the further question be raised, What is the real nature of that subject of the mental phenomena popularly spoken of as the mind? we surely cannot approach the answer to this question without calling attention to the nature of the phenomena themselves. So far as the necessities of the present discussion are concerned, 588 RELATIONS OF MIND AND BRAIN. it may be said that there are two rival and contrary ways of reply- ing to the general inquiry into the nature of the Mind. One of these denies that, in order to account for mental phenomena, we need assume much less are able to prove the existence of any reality other than the material substance of the living and active nervous system (especially, or wholly, of the brain). The other, on the contrary, claims that no explanation of mental phenomena is possible without referring them to a non-material or spiritual entity as the real subject or ground of them all. Both of these ways of explanation admit of various modifications. The former, as held by its different advocates, has used different terms to set forth the relation in which it believes that the phenomena of con- sciousness stand to the states and activities of the brain. The lat- ter, also, has by no means always been self-consistent in its advo- cacy of the unique and independent character of the subject of mental phenomena. Even the power of immediately penetrating in consciousness the secret of its own interior nature has sometimes been claimed for the mind. The former of the foregoing views, in whatever particular shape it may occur, has customarily been re- garded as essentially the "materialistic," and the latter as the " spiritualistic," theory of the human mind. A third view, which regards both the so-called "brain" and the so-called "mind" as merely phenomenal aspects of some one reality that is like neither, but manifests itself in both, requires for its discussion so much of subtle metaphysics, and is so foreign to all the scientific material with which we have thus far been dealing, that it is for the present passed by with a bare allusion. 4. In the remaining part of our discussion we shall be chief- ly occupied with considering which one of the two theories just stated best accords with all the facts. These facts, which are to test the theory, are facts of the nervous mechanism, and of the correlations between this mechanism and the phenomena of con- sciousness. The question before us may then be stated in the following provisional form : Do the phenomena of consciousness require for their explanation nothing more than a statement of those changes in the material mechanism with which they are obvi- ously correlated ; or do they also require the assumption of one real and non-material being as the subject and ground of them all ? To repeat a remark already made, the approach to this question must be through the introspective study of mind ; for only such study can tell us what the phenomena of consciousness actually are. 5. It is so obvious as scarcely to need or admit of debate, that mental phenomena are not identical with the changing conditions CONSCIOUSNESS AND NERVE-COMMOTION. 589 and activities of the nervous system. However our states of con- sciousness may be related to the states of the brain even if the former are absolutely and without exception dependent upon the latter the two are certainly not the same. What the exact states of the brain are with which any of the mental states are correlated we know only very imperfectly and by remote conjecture. But so far as we do know anything about the particular molecular activities of the central nervous system which are most directly connected with the phenomena of consciousness, they do not differ essentially from other molecular activities of this system not thus connected with consciousness. The chemical constitution and structural form of the nerve-fibres and nerve-cells of the brain do not differ from those of the spinal cord in any such respect as, of itself, to account for the difference in the relations in which the two stand to con- scious mental states. They do not so differ even from the mole- cules which enter into the living plant or animal of much lower species, mentally, than man. It is a surprise, from which scientific investigation can never recover, to find that the Connection between our sensations, mental images, and volitions and the peculiar ma- terial constitution and functions of the cerebral mass of nervous matter should be so intimate as it undoubtedly is. The foregoing fact shows that it is quite impossible to regard the two classes of events the molecular changes of the central nervous mass and the happenings of our conscious experience as one and the same. All physical events are modes of motion alterations in the re- lations of the material atoms or masses to each other in space. This is as true of the human brain as it is of the clod of the valley. Its atoms cannot be conceived of as doing anything, so long as they remain material atoms, that does not essentially consist merely in changing their relations in space to other material atoms. This is the activity which chemistry supposes to be continually taking place as the work of nutrition and depletion in the nervous cen- tres accompanies the process of thought ; this is what, as general "nerve-physiology" rightfully conjectures, occurs when any form of stimulus acts upon the afferent nerve through the end-organs of sense, and corresponding states of sensation arise in the mind. But the conscious process of thinking ?s not the change in the chemical constitution of the nervous mass ; the conscious sensa- tions are not the wave-like movements of nerve-fibres and nerve- cells. It is not simply true that to identify these two kinds of phenomena phenomena of the motion of material atoms and phenomena of change in mental states is difficult for the average mind, but attainable by the scientific observer ; it is rather true 590 RELATIONS OF MIND AND BRAIN. that no mind can frame any intelligible idea of what could be meant by identifying the two. Moreover, the history of investigation shows that a man may be highly trained, both in the. observation of the phenomena of the animal body and of his own self-conscious mind (for example, Aristotle), without even suspecting the important relation which exists between the latter and the cerebral mass. Indeed, there is no distinction which all men are compelled to make more clearly than that between their own conscious states and the changing con- ditions, by way of motion, of the masses and molecules of matter. All theory which assumes the possibility of identifying molecular motions of brain-atoms with the shifting forms of mental experi- ence, or attempts to set forth the peculiar nature of the latter by simply stating the conjectured laws which control the former, in- creases the general confusion which tends to surround the whole subject. 6. Furthermore, it is not easy to see what could possibly be meant, that is worth serious consideration, by speaking of the phe- nomena of consciousness as the product of the brain. By the word "product "we ordinarily understand the new form into which a material substance has been thrown by the action upon it of some machine or mechanism. Thus we call certain secretions of the body the "product" of the tissues where they are secreted in somewhat the same way as that in which we speak of the products of the field or of the loom. The function of the living molecular mech- anism of which certain tissues consist is exercised in producing from the pabulum brought to them by the blood the secretions of gastric juice and bile. To speak of mental states and processes as the " product " of the nervous mass of the brain, in any sense of the words corresponding to that which we rightly apply to the various secretions of the body, involves us at once in the grossest absurdities. The secretory product of the brain is the fluid found in certain of its cavities ; its nutritive product, so to speak, is the new nervous tissue which is constantly being formed from the blood by that activity of reproducing its own kind which this tis- sue has in common with other living tissues. But this fluid and these newly produced molecules or nerve-corpuscles in the brain are in themselves no more like mental processes, and no more to be identified with such processes, than are the tears that flow from the tear-ducts or the pus that exudes from a wound. In so crass a way of speaking it is difficult to distinguish what can properly be meant by compaiing under the term " product " the relation of conscious sensation and thought to the brain with the relation of CONSCIOUSNESS AND NEKVE-COMMOTION. 591 the gastric juice to the stomach or of the pancreatic juice to the pancreas. There is another and more plausible use of the word "product 5 ' to describe the connection between the nervous matter of the brain and the phenomena of consciousness. When a system of material molecules is acting under relations to each other which are deter- mined by their constitution, arrangement, and environment, we may speak of the constantly new relations which they assume as the product of their previous constitution and arrangement, and of whatever influences act upon them from material molecules outside of the system (the environment). Thus the functional activity of the nervous centres, the complex and interacting nerve-commotions of the brain, might be regarded as the product of the matter constituting these centres. This manner of speaking has certain marked advantages. It emphasizes the merely mechanical point of view. It insists upon the valid assumption that the account of every change that arises in the material particles out of which the brain is composed must be sought for in the previous constitution and arrangement of those same particles as acted upon by stimuli either external or internal to the whole brain-mass. Let us suppose, for the sake of illustration, an incredible increase in our powers of observation. Let us suppose that it were possible with the microscope to discern the exact chemical constitution of every molecule of the nervous substance of the brain, to watch the motion of all the atoms composing these molecules as chemical changes take place or as waves of nerve-commotion in infinite va- riety move hither and thither among its countless nerve-fibres and nerve-cells. All this would be in itself absolutely nothing more than an expansion under the eye of the observer of what he sometimes sees in somewhat grosser form for example, in the amoeba and of what he infers is constantly taking place in every kind of nervous tissue. The status of the system of moving molecules at each in- stant is to be explained so far as explanation is possible from its status at the preceding instant, in connection with any influences brought to bear upon it from the outside. Moreover, all such out- side influences, so far as they are of a physical sort, are nothing but modes of the molecular activity of other material particles. Looked at in this way, the product of the brain is the molecular activity of the brain. That is to say, the function of this unique system of molecules is to be constantly in motion, in the form of activity which we have already examined as "nerve-commotion." But if the foregoing statement be admitted, how does it help us in the least to understand the phenomena of consciousness regarded 592 EELATIONS OF MIND AND BRAIN. as the product of the brain ? In order to hold that mental phe- nomena are related to the substance of the brain, in the same way as that in which the nerve-commotions or molecular changes are related to the same substance, we must identify mental phenom- ena with molecular changes. But we have already seen that it is impossible to identify the two classes of phenomena, as phenomena. The phenomena of nerve-commotion may be regarded as the prod- uct of the nervous mass in which they occur ; that is, they may be attributed to the constitution and arrangement of the molecules which compose this mass, as showing what the mass can do. But the phenomena of consciousness cannot be regarded as the product of the same nervous mass in any similar meaning of the word "product." 7. Yet another unsatisfactory way of regarding the relation between the brain and conscious mental phenomena requires a more detailed and careful consideration. Everything in our pre- vious examination has tended to show that the molecular changes which go on in the brain, whether they are occasioned by afferent impulses that originate in the application of stimuli to the end- organs of sense, or by the modified amount and quality of the blood- supply, are not only regular antecedents, but true causes of what takes place in the mind. All the second part of this treatise was occupied in pointing out the different classes of such relations between physical antecedents and consequent mental phenomena. [The objections which are ordinarily urged against speaking of physical changes as the cause of the phenomena of consciousness will be raised and answered later on.] It is plain to every unprejudiced mind that, in some valid sense, changes in the condition and activity of the substance of the brain are specially related to certain of the shifting phenomena of con- scious mental life. From this admission, which is enforced by the entire study of Physiological Psychology, the temptation is strong to proceed at once to the completion of an apparently simple and comprehensive theory. This theory claims that all mental phenom- ena, whatever their varied characteristic shading, have exact equiva- lents, as it were, in specific forms of the nerve-commotion of the living brain. Every such phenomenon, therefore, is only the man- ifestation of what has previously taken place, or is simultaneously taking place, in the physical molecular structure of the nervous centres. To employ a figure of speech for every state and action of the so-called mind in consciousness, that collection of nerve- fibres and nerve-cells which we call the brain exacts a payment in some special kind of coin. For example, with the molecular CEEEBEAL AND MENTAL COMBINATIONS. 593 changes in the substance of the brain which may be designated A, B, C, D, etc., the mental states called a, ft y, 3, etc., are uniformly and necessarily joined ; and with the combination of molecular changes which may be described by A -h B -f C + D, etc., the mental states a + /5 + y + S, etc., are as uniformly and necessarily joined. When the molecular changes recur in a fainter or modi- fied form, as A', B', C', D', then there must be a recurrence of the corresponding mental states, only in fainter form, as a', ft, y', S'. Finally, it is without exception true so this theory holds that nothing happens in the mind by way of conscious sensation, pres- entation of objects of sense, ideation, reproduction of mental im- ages, and higher aesthetic feeling or intellectual processes or choice, which does not find its only real explanation in the equivalent changing states of the nervous system. 8. Our first impression on considering the foregoing way of ac- counting for mental phenomena is that of a certain surprising audaci- ty. The theory, standing on a slender basis of real fact, makes a leap into the dark which carries it centuries in advance of where the light of modern research is now clearly shining. Physiological Psychology, as we have been compelled to regard it, has been seen to be encompassed with difficulties at every step ; and some of these difficulties appear absolutely insurmountable. It has achieved its greatest triumphs in giving a physical and physiological expla- nation of the variations in the quantity and quality of sensation, and of the time-rate of the simpler mental processes. But even in these domains of greatest achievement it is found that almost every- thing needed for an exact science of the relations of the molecular changes in the substance of the brain and the changes in states of consciousness is lamentably deficient. In the first place, little prog- ress has been made in framing a theory of the nature of the phys- ical changes themselves. Physical science is not as yet able to deal with the phenomena of nervous action, as shown even by a single living nerve with a muscle attached when acted upon by any one form of external stimuli ; how much less, then, with that vast com- plex of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells which constitutes the human brain ! As to purely physical explanations of the variations in the quantity of sensations we are also in great doubt. No adequate means exist for measuring accurately the changes in the amount of all the stimuli which act on the end-organs of sense. We have less knowledge of the laws which regulate the amount of excitation set up in these organs by changes in the amount of stimuli; and scarcely any real knowledge at all of what molecular changes take place within the central organs when the afferent nerves have stirred 594 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. them to their characteristic action. Hence Fechner's laws, con- sidered as merely empirical statements of relations between the amounts of certain external stimuli and our judgments under ex- traordinary conditions as to how much we are affected thereby, are readily disputed. But considered as setting fortli the essential re- lations which exist between the physical changes in the brain and the intensities of the resulting mental changes they are quite inde- fensible. Moreover, the amount of our being affected, the quan- tity of the sensation which results from the application of physical stimulus, can be determined only by the judgment of the same consciousness which is affected with the sensation. But judgment itself is a form of mental phenomena for the essential part of which no physical equivalent can be discovered or even conceived of. What has just been said concerning our inability to give a com- plete physical explanation of variations in the quantity of sensa- tions applies with equal force to their qualities and time-relations. But even if the whole field of sensation, as respects the amounts, kinds, and order in time of its phenomena, were already covered by such purely physical explanation as refers them wholly to changes in the molecular condition of the brain, the above-mentioned theory would by no means be established. For in investigating the corre- lations which undoubtedly exist between the nervous mechanism and the phenomena of consciousness, it is found that some of these phenomena imply activities of the mind which do not admit, in any sense of the word, of being thus correlated. For an example upon this point, we may refer to what was said (Part II, chapters VI. and VIE.) as to a mental synthesis being implied in the formation of all presentations of sense. " Things " are not mere loose aggregates of sensations. They are the results of mental synthetic acts, the laws of which cannot be attributed solely to the various ways in which the physical molecules of the brain are made to move by the action of stimuli reaching them. Let it be admitted that, with in- creased information, we should find the scale of varieties in the kinds of mental phenomena called sensations corresponding, point for point, to the scale of varieties in the manner of the motion of the waves of nervous excitation. Let it also be admitted that the scale of the changes in the intensities of mental phenomena, that are of the same kind, corresponds with equal exactness to the scale of the changes in the vibratory swing of these waves. Let it be still further admitted that, whenever any presentation of sense occurs, there exists a kind and amount of various excitations simultane- ously effected in the brain which corresponds exactly to this par- NATURE OF ALL "THINGS." 595 ticular presentation of sense. The mere congeries or common occurrence of such sensations, as the necessary result of the exci- tations of the brain, does not constitute a real " Thing." Each "thing" implies, not simply a vast number of moving physical molecules, on the kind and amount of whose motion the phenomena of conscious sensation are dependent, but a uniting energy and a unity in mind. Fifty million molecules, even when they are highly complex and unstable phosporized compounds, gyrating in the most wonderful fashion with inconceivable rapidity, certainly do not constitute one thing. They do not, then, by molecular constitution and activities, even constitute a physical basis which is conceivable as a representative or correlate of one thing. Each molecule among them all, even in order to be conceived of as being itself one such thing among the other millions of more or less similar but not identical molecules, is dependent upon this same synthetic activity of the mind. 9. Still further, the study of metaphysics shows us that certain assumptions, which are not of a sensuous character, or verifiable at all by an appeal to the sensations, enter into every presentation of sense. No such presentation of sense consists of a mere put- ting together of individual sensations. Whatever account one may choose to give of the nature and origin of this belief, there can be no doubt that all men do believe that the "things" they perceive are neither bare groupings of mental phenomena nor forms of the molecular motion of a nervous mass ; men believe that things are real existences set in space outside of their own bodies. Things are known as real ; they are supposed to have attributes ; they act on each other and on us who observe them ; they exercise force ; they are extended and movable in space, and continue uninterrupt- edly through more or less of time. To be all this is necessary in order to be a "Thing." Now, the assumptions which enter into the popular belief may be regarded as all true or all false, or as partly false and partly true, in the form in which men ordinarily hold them. But not one of them is capable of being justified, or in any way accounted for, by an enumeration of the sensory states into which consciousness is thrown by the action of the stimuli on the nervous system. Much less is it accounted for by refer- ence to certain hypothetical wave-like motions in the substance of the brain. That such wave-like motions occur we have no doubt. That the changes in the quantity and quality of the sensations are related to, and dependent upon, the intensity and the kind of these motions is a most reasonable conjecture. That the motions which are correlated with the presentations of sense differ in kind or de- 596 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. gree from those which are correlated with mere images of imagi- nation may also be true. It is true, furthermore, that our percep- tions and ideas of the extension and motion of things are dependent for their characteristics in great measure upon the structure of the physical organism. But it is impossible to conceive of any form of molecular motion which could serve as the physical basis or physical representative of any of those metaphysical assumptions which enter into all knowledge of things. What kind of nervous action can be the equivalent of an unchanging conviction or belief in the reality and true causal energy of all things both visible and invisible ? What splitting up of the chemical constitution of the molecules of nervous substance, or difference in the character of their agitations, can be conceived of as analogous to, or serving as true cause of, the distinction which .is involved in our speaking of each Thing as though it were a substance with attributes ? Keference to what has already been said (Part II., chapter X.) concerning the impossibility of assigning a physical basis to the mental operations of voluntary recollection, with its recognition of similarity, to attentive choice, and to all the discrimination which underlies the work of the intellect proper, will furnish further oc- casion for distrusting the above-mentioned theory. For example, the new process of physical excitation, which serves as the " basis " so to speak of any image of memory, may be similar to the process which served as the basis of the original presentation of sense. But the mental act of recognizing the similarity of the ob- ject before the mind to one no longer before it, and yet of distin- guishing the former from the latter as characterized by the time in which it occurs, does not admit of being conceived of under any analogy to such physical processes. The same thing may be said of consciousness in itself considered, and so of every mental phe- nomenon considered as being what it actually is a phase of con- sciousness. But to make clear this aspect of the case requires that we should resume the consideration of the so-called "material- istic" theory of the relations between mental phenomena and ner- vous substance from a slightly different point of view. 10. There can be no doubt that the popular and wellnigh uni- versal belief regards the subject of the mental phenomena as a real, non-material, and permanent being. This belief also undoubtedly regards this subject as one indivisible being, a "unit-being." In other words, the prevalent conception of the Mind is that of an existence which is spiritual and is a unity in some unique sense. The many objections which have been raised against the belief may be divided into two classes one of which may be called INFLUENCE OF THE BLOOD-SUPPLY. 597 metaphysical, and the other physiological or physical. The meta- physical objections arise, in part, from the difficulty which is felt in defining what is meant by "reality," "spirituality" (or non- materiality), and " unity " in that strict sense in which these terms are thought to apply to the mind. The consideration, both of these objections and of that way of considering the facts which es- capes them as far as possible, will be for the present postponed. But the other class of objections arises from the very facts with which it is the special business of the science of Physiological Psychology to deal. It may be summarily stated in the form of questions like the following : What kind of permanent reality can belong to a being whose essential characteristic of having various states of consciousness can be temporarily laid aside when the brain sleeps or is deprived of its blood-supply ; or can be wholly lost when certain nervous centres are subjected to permanent pressure or destroyed by disease or the surgeon's knife ? How can non- materiality be affirmed of phenomena which so far as we can trace them at all exist only in immediate dependence upon a cer- tain chemical constitution, structural form and arrangement, and functional activity of material atoms ? How can the claim of be- ing the highest unity be made for that which exists at all only as it is in a constant flux ; which, indeed, is possessed of its one charac- teristic activity of being conscious, only on condition that it divides itself into subject and object and experiences a constant change of the forms in which it is conscious? In spite of such objections from the physiological point of view as are the foregoing, the popular assumption, when freed from its crudities and interpreted intelligently, may be shown to be the only one compatible with all the facts of observation. It may be shown that it is demanded by these facts. On the contrary, the attrib- uting of mental phenomena to the substance of the brain (with or Without including the rest of the nervous substance) does not satisfy the facts of observation. The relation between brain and mind is not such that the former can be considered as a real being, of which the phenomena of the latter may be regarded as activities. Another real being must be assumed to exist as the subject of the mental phenomena a being with a nature quite unlike that of material molecules. 11. The phenomena whose relation to the molecules of the ner- vous system is in dispute are phenomena of consciousness. Noth- ing in regard to these phenomena is more impressive, upon first subjecting them, as such, to introspective observation, than their surprising complexity in unity. Or we may rather say, the way in 598 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. which all states of consciousness, however different they may be with respect to characteristic quality or origin, are attributed by the conscious subject to one subject as his own states is the most surprising of all facts. This fact underlies all the truths and laws into which psychology inquires, whether starting from the physio- logical or from some other point of view. It has been customary for psychologists to classify all the mental phenomena under a few so-called " faculties " of the mind. The objection has often been made to such classification that it tends to confuse or destroy a just appreciation of the unity of mind. A more obvious objection to the ordinary psychological classification is perhaps this, that it fails to take due account of the vast com- plexity of mental phenomena. For it should never be forgotten mental phenomena are always, primarily considered, nothing more than events. This is true of sensations and perceptions, with all their objective reference, as well as of acts of imagination and of so-called pure thought. The yellow of the watch, the red of the rose, which I see, are modes of the affection of my consciousness. Excluding for the present all reference to any metaphysical assump- tions, these colors are simply events in consciousness. The real processes outside of consciousness the objective existences and events to which the events in consciousness are referred by science are in no sense similar to the events of consciousness themselves. What the real process outside of consciousness is whether it consist of rapidly vibrating waves of ether, or of photo-chemical changes in the tissues of the retina, or of nerve-commotions prop- agated along the optic nerve and in the upper occipital lobe of the brain we know only by doubtful inference from certain con- scious affections of our own to certain material existences assumed to exist out of consciousness. Whether the right to make these inferences be disputed or allowed, there can be no dispute over the statement that the phenomena of conscious vision are not copies of any of these external events. What is true of colors is also plainly true of smells, and tastes, and sounds. These sensations are all events in consciousness. Recent researches into the nature of the sensations which come through the excitation of the skin show that these also are, primarily considered, mental events of various kinds ; such as having the feeling of cold, or of heat, or of pain, or of pressure, or of motion, etc. Moreover, the modern experimental view of the way in which the sensations are localized and synthetically combined to form the presentations of sense shows that the latter also must be consid- ered as being, primarily, mental events. Of course there is a sense COMPLEXITY OF MENTAL PHENOMENA. 699 in which it is absurd to say, not simply, " Perceptions of things are always merely mental events; "but also, "Things themselves are merely mental events. " It has already been shown that certain, as- sumptions enter into all our perceptions and conceptions of so- called " things ; " but that even the attempt to account for these assumptions, by assigning them to any conceivable form of a physi- cal basis in the brain, leads to absurdity. Still there is also a sense in which " things," that can certainly never be any different with respect to their known qualities from the way in which they appear to us when perceived, are mental events. Sensations are mental events ; the discriminating, combining, and localizing of sensations are mental events. Things to us are never more than discrimi- nated, combined, and localized sensations, plus the metaphysical assumptions to which reference has been made. 12. Reflection upon facts like those just stated leads us to won- der at the enormous complexity of mental phenomena. For the purposes of the practical life we are warranted in regarding the surrounding world as composed of a limited number of material existences that undergo little or no change from day to day. But this way of regarding the objects of experience does not at all satisfy the demands of psychological inquiry. Such inquiry con- siders the knowledge of external nature, as well as of what is recog- nized as pertaining most strictly to the world within, to involve an unceasing change in the activities of consciousness. Indeed, with the limitations already referred to, we may say that the entire world, so far as it is our world, consists only of these changing states. It follows, then, that the first truth of which we have to take account is the following : Our entire conscious existence whether regarded simply as being ourselves affected in a certain way or as having a purely objective experience of the existence and qualities of so-called Things is a continually shifting succession of individual mental activities, no one of which is exactly like any other or is to be considered as a mere repetition of any other. It would be acknowledged by all that a mental state of pain on account of toothache is different from a state of pleasure in smell- ing a rose ; that the sensation of yellow is unlike the sensation of red, and that these sensations, in common with all sensations of color, are unlike those of touching a cold piece of iron or of hear- ing a musical tone. All the practical activities of men are based upon the conviction that the individual things with which they deal differ from each other not simply in respect to the qualities they have, and the degree in which they severally possess these qualities, but also as separate real beings differ. But the truth 600 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. now under consideration reaches further than this common ac- knowledgment. Strictly speaking, from the point of view taken by an analysis of consciousness, the same so-called " thing " is never in experience twice the same. Every time that it exists before the mind, as a presentation of sense, it is constituted anew by an ac- tivity of the mind. Unless various localized sensations and re- membered images of sensations are " synthesized " under the laws which govern such kinds of mental phenomena, there can be no presentation of sense ; and the only " thing " which has immedi- ate existence for us is the presentation of sense. Accordingly, the variety of the mental phenomena, when we begin the attempt to classify them, appears as great as that of all the individual acts and states of consciousness, whether those acts and states have reference to comparatively unchanging beings outside of conscious- ness or not. Even a description of the different kinds of mental phenomena which psychological science proposes to explain would be impos- sible, if the foregoing truth were not merely one side of the whole truth. For what is infinite in variety and always changing its kind cannot be described. There could then be no science of the mental phenomena, no classification of the states of consciousness, or ex- planation of them by relating them to each other and to the physical basis on which they are supposed to rest. 13. Observation of the phenomena of consciousness, however, shows us that they are plainly classifiable, and that the authority on which this classifying reposes is immediate and indisputable. For the phenomena of consciousness are directly recognized in con- sciousness as like or unlike with varying degrees of similarity and dissimilarity. They are assigned by everyone possessed of a de- veloped experience to this or that class, without any question that the act of classification is legitimate and correct. The number of distinguishable colors, or kinds of visual sensations, is indeed in- definitely large ; and so is the number of sensations of musical tone. The power to make all the necessary discriminations in these sensations varies greatly with different persons. It is perfectly proper to say that the number of kinds of the states of conscious- ness arising through the senses of sight and sound varies greatly in different individuals. There are many more colors and tones for some men than for others. The qualities belonging to the sen- sations which follow excitation of the skin are also diverse ; and, in the case of sensations of smell, the means of classification for each individual are limited chiefly by the number of the different smellable things with which he has happened to come in contact. DIFFERENCES IN PHENOMENA. 601 It must also be confessed that the popular classifications of the states of consciousness, as based on conscious experience itself, is not infrequently erroneous. So far as the sensations are concerned, this is partly due to the fact that they are ordinarily referred to some thing or to some part of the body, which is only approximately cor- rect, and yet correct enough for practical purposes. The taste of the onion is no less clearly distinguished from other states of sensa- tion arising through the mouth because the subject of the taste does not know that his sensations are in fact largely sensations of smell. Because one believes that one tastes the pepper instead of feels it with the tongue, one has lost none of one's power to make clear dis- criminations in the domain of consciousness. Nor is this power taken from the color-blind, although the length of their color-spec- trum is shortened so that they have a less extended domain of sen- sations of this order within which to discriminate. It appears, then, that likenesses and unlikenesses in the phe- nomena of consciousness, and an immediate "awareness" so to speak of these likenesses and unlikenesses, or direct discrimina- tion by consciousness of the quality of the states of consciousness, as such, are involved in that classification of the mental phenomena which all men make. If the classification becomes more refined and elaborate, it at no time ceases to repose on the same founda- tion. All classifications of mental phenomena which have any other foundation, or which introduce any other consideration than the simple one of how I, the conscious subject, am affected, are not really classifications of mental phenomena as such. Such alleged classifications may indeed tell us much that scientific inquiry de- sires to know about the origin or correlations of the mental phe- nomena. They may assume to say what special part of the external organ of sense, or what special area of the brain, is more direct- ly concerned in producing the physical state which precedes or causes the mental phenomena. They may demonstrate what kind of physical stimuli result, respectively, in exciting such and such states of consciousness. But they tell nothing whatever as to what the phenomena really are, whether like or unlike, or as to how they may be ranged and rated together. They are classifications of the causes, or occasions, or physical excitements of the mental phe- nomena ; they are not classifications of mental phenomena, as such. 14. Moreover, the principles which regulate the formation of classes among the conscious states of the rnind are very different from those which regulate the proposal to classify the elements of the physical basis of these states, or the molecular activities of these elements. To be sure, the Young-Helmholtz theory of vis- 602 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. ual sensations proposes to distinguish reel, green, and yellow as the three kinds of retinal elements ; and the opto-chemical theory of vision speculates as to the classes of pigments connected with the seeing of various colors. It has been held by some physiolo- gists that the two main parts of the inner ear (vestibule and coch- lea) correspond to the two principal classes of sensations of sound (to noises and musical tones) ; or even that the vibration of an in- dividual nervous element in the organ of Corti represents, in some sort, each definite one among the many states of consciousness that constitute our hearing of a melody. Sensations of feeling may be classified as of peripheral or central origin, in reference to the place from which the nervous impulses occasioning them are sup- posed to take their rise. But one need not be deceived by all this. The " red " retinal elements are not themselves red ; and if they did appear of this color to external observation, it would not in the least degree help us the better to understand what is the quality of that state of consciousness which we call the sensation of red. The different nervous elements of the organ of Corti may be capa- ble of being arranged in a scale ; if so, they are classified as longer or shorter, and as arranged in space one above the other. But this classification is in no real respect like that which we make when we arrange the states of consciousness called musical tones in a scale of their pitch. In general, the physical elements of the nervous system are di- visible into classes according to their chemical constitution as, for example, the phosphorized and the non-phosphorized proximate principles of the brain ; or, according to their structural form, into nerve-fibres and nerve-cells of a great variety of shapes, sizes, etc. ; or, according to their physiological function, into afferent and effer- ent, reflex or inhibitory or automatic. But no such principles of division can be carried over to the mental phenomena. They have absolutely no applicability to these phenomena, as such. We cannot introduce distinctions of chemical constitution, structural form, and physiological function into sensations and ideas, into feelings and thoughts and acts of will. A phosphorized thought, or a stellate feeling, or an afferent thought, are phrases that have no meaning. Nor should we be any better able to apply the principles by which we classify the different factors of the physical basis of conscious- ness to the phenomena of consciousness itself, in case we had a much more minute acquaintance with those factors. Let it be sup- posed that psycho-physical science should so far advance as to be able to tell precisely what kinds of molecular activities of what nervous elements are correlated with all the various classes of PRINCIPLES OF CLASSIFICATION. 603 mental phenomena. The latter would still remain precisely such as they are in kind ; they would still have to be classified, if at all, on the ground of their likenesses and unlikenesses as directly known in consciousness. If it should be discovered that the mo- lecular agitation of a particular group of fibres and cells in the or- gan of Corti is necessary in order to produce the sensation of the musical note a, and that this agitation resembles that which some- what similar fibres and cells in the retina undergo preceding the sensation of a particular shade of green, the two sensations would then be no easier to classify together than they are now. Both stand near the middle of their respective scales. In that respect it might be said that the sensation of the musical tone a' is like the sensation of green. This point of likeness is really, however, one that appertains solely to a physical quality or function in certain bits of nervous matter more or less directly connected with the physical antecedents of the sensations ; it cannot be conceived of as appertaining to the sensations themselves. 15. Considerations derived from the theory of the quantity of stimuli and their resulting intensities in the states of conscious- ness might be urged in the same direction. The variations in the amount of the molecular processes within the nervous system are all measurable and classifiable, if at all, on principles with which physics is familiar. The excitation in the nervous system always consists simply of so many molecules, having such a chemical con- stitution, moving so much in such a direction with relation to each other. But the most nearly related mental phenomena are feelings, and judgments comparing feelings, such as can be expressed only somewhat as follows : " Now that shade of red seems to me a little more intense ; " or, " now I think something has been added to the sensation of pressure ; " or, " I should call this note the major third of the other." In general, we may say that, quantitatively considered, the changes in the nervous mechanism are all precisely alike as to kind that is, are all that mode of motion called "nerve- commotion " and admit of being measured off by a common phys- ical standard or unit of measure. But the mental phenomena are classifiable only as a succession of states, that are continually chang- ing their quality and have no quantitative measure which we can separate from these changes of quality. Nerve-commotions can be conceived of as added and subtracted, switched to the right or to the left, concentrated, distributed, dissipated. But, strictly speak- ing, the resulting mental phenomena admit of no treatment of this sort. Every sensation exists, if at all, as an indivisible qualitative state of consciousness ; it cannot even, as such state, be retained to 604 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. . be compared with some other succeeding state, in order to decide whether it is more or is less in respect to quantity*. Without memory and comparison, which are complex activities of mind dif- ferent from the mere having of sensation, we could not affirm of any mental state that it is more or less than another. Still further, other forms of mental activity which have an un- doubted reality do not admit of even the loose application to them of terms of quantity which is proper when speaking of sensations and feelings. A " weighty" judgment and a " high " ideal are not to be measured by standards that admit of correlation with the in- creasing or diminishing swing of nervous molecules. Yet if those classes of the phenomena of consciousness which these words imply have, as such, any physical basis whatever, this basis must consist in some form of nerve-commotion as to the quantity of which an exact measurement is conceivable. If, however, a wide swing of the molecules were found to go with a good, sound, clear judg- ment, and a contracted swing to be the physical cause of narrow- ness of mental apprehension, such a fact would not help us in any regard the better to revise the Aristotelian classification of the syl- logism. Reasoning, as a mental activity, would be deductive or inductive, analytic or synthetic, as before, after making the discov- ery that the one process is connected with a continual diminution of the cortical areas over which the nerve-commotions spread them- selves, and the other with a noble diffusion of such commotions over an ever-widening expanse of the brain. 16. It is an undoubted fact, however, that mental phenomena admit of a fairly satisfactory arrangement into classes. The ar- rangement can be made only upon the basis of their likenesses and unlikenesses as known in consciousness and by consciousness. No other arrangement of these phenomena, as such, is possible none that is not founded upon the same ultimate facts thus distinguished. All attempts at an arrangement of them by other principles, and from other points of view, result in the classification of something else (such as the physical antecedents, causes, or concomitants) than the phenomena themselves. It is not strange, then, that the " old psychology " won its principal triumphs, by the method of introspection, within the field of classification. The crude begin- nings of a physiological psychology in the phrenology of Gall and Spurzheim were obliged at that time to accept from introspective psychology its division of the mind's activities into so-called " fac- ulties." In its more scientific and experimental form at the pres- ent time physiological psychology is just as dependent as ever upon introspective psychology for a classification of the mental KINDS OF MENTAL PHENOMENA. 605 phenomena. The introspective science of mind has already arrived at very general agreement upon this point. It is very generally agreed that all the mental phenomena are classifiable under three great heads into phenomena of knowing, phenomena of feeling, and phenomena called acts of will. The distinction of the two latter classes of phenomena is, indeed, a mat- ter established in comparatively recent times. A certain number of investigators, who use the method of introspection, still venture to affirm that acts of feeling in the form of desire are not to be dis- tinguished as differing in kind from acts of will. In their view, so-called acts of will are resolvable into phenomena of feeling. But the opinion of the great majority of students of psychology is decidedly in favor of adhering to the threefold division of the mental faculties. There is also a large amount of agreement as to the sub-classes that fall under these three at any rate, with the exception of the varied efforts made to deal with the very complex phenomena of feeling in its many forms. The more recent at- tempts (made especially by certain English writers on psychology) to depart from the accepted classifications of the " old psychology" have attained little or no valuable result. These attempts have in- troduced into psychology a great number of uncouth terms, derived largely from false analogies of physical science, which tend to rep- resent the case as though sensations could be weighed or measured or compounded like the nervous shocks which cause them, and as though ideas could become " agglutinated " or "agglomerated" like globules of mercury or minute particles of water. Such at- tempts, however, have thrown no light on the nature of the mental phenomena, or on the question of their correct classification ; they have not really succeeded in supplanting or discrediting the classi- fications of the " old psychology." Nor is it at all likely that the principal classes into which all mental phenomena are now thrown will ever be changed. The " faculties" of the mind however the term is to be understood will remain the same. At all events, if a change should be made in these divisions, such change could only be accomplished by the method of introspection. 17. The question may now be raised : How are we to account for facts like the foregoing? In attempting an answer to this question, the great significance of the facts themselves should be recalled. It has been shown that mental phenomena cannot be conceived of as identical with the molecular motions of the nervous mass ; and that the fundamental relations between the two cannot be expressed by the statement, the phenomena of consciousness are the product of the brain in any meaning of the word " product " 606 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. which can be clearly defined. Nor can the theory be accepted that every mental state and process has its exact equivalent, with respect to all its factors, in some antecedent or concomitant state or pro- cess of cerebral nerve-fibres and nerve-cells, and that therefore all mental phenomena are to be directly and exclusively referred to these physical structures as their sole subject or ground. More- over, it has been found necessary to admit that mental phenomena, as such, can be classified only by introspection ; and that the prin- ciples on which the classification must be based differ from those applicable to the nervous substance, while the actual classes discov- ered by the only available method do not correspond to any of those with which physics and physiology make us familiar. And yet there is no insuperable difficulty in classifying the phenomena of mind. Introspective psychology furnishes us with a classifica- tion, on the whole, tolerably satisfactory What, then, is the fair inference from all these facts with respect to a decision between the two theories of mind which were previ- ously proposed ? (See 3. ) Plainly, such inference favors looking toward some other subject or ground of the mental phenomena than the nervous substance of the brain. Its result commends sub- stantially the same view as that held by the great majority of man- kind. We shall state and explain this view, however, in different terms from those employed by this majority. The phenomena of human consciousness must be regarded as activi- ties of some other form of Eeal Being than the moving molecules of the brain. They require a subject or ground which is in nature unlike the phosphorized fats of the central masses, the aggregated nerve-fibres and nerve-cells of the cerebral cortex. This real be- ing, thus manifested immediately to itself in the phenomena of consciousness, and indirectly to others through the bodily changes, is the Mind. To it the mental phenomena are to be attributed as showing what it is by what it does. The so-called mental "fac- ulties " are only the modes of the behavior in consciousness of this real being. We actually find, by the only method available, that this real being called Mind behaves in certain perpetually recur- ring modes ; therefore, we attribute to it certain faculties. The mental faculties, then, are not entities that have an existence of themselves ; nor are the individual behavings of the mind (the so-called " ideas ") existences that can become " agglutinated " or " associated " or " compounded " in any way. They are not divisions of the mind ; nor are they pouters of the mind, if by this word be meant some permanent recognizable reality, stored up in a spiritual subject, or attached to it or inherent in it, after THE UNITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS. 607 the analogy of the relation of physical forces to their subjects, the atoms. The faculties of the mind are the modes of the behavior, in consciousness, of the mind. And the very nature of the classi- fying acts which lead to their being distinguished is explicable only upon the assumption that a real being called mind exists, and is to be distinguished from the real beings known as the physical molecules of the brain's nervous mass. That the subject of the states of consciousness is a real being, standing in certain relations to the material beings which com- pose the substance of the brain, is a conclusion warranted by all the facts. That the modes of its activity in consciousness are cor- related under law with the activities of the brain-substance is a statement which Physiological Psychology confirms ; one upon which, indeed, it is largely based. It will be our task, in a subse- quent chapter, to consider under what general terms such correla- tion may best be expressed. All physical science, however, is based upon the assumption that real beings may have an existence such as is sometimes called " independent," and yet be constantly re- lated to each other under known or discoverable laws. If this as- sumption could not be made and verified, all the modern atomic theory would stand for nothing but a vain show of abstractions. Upon what grounds of reason or courtesy we may inquire at this point does Materialism decline to admit the validity of similar as- sumptions as demanded by mental phenomena ? 18. The foregoing view of the mind and its faculties is greatly confirmed by another consideration. Consciousness has a certain remarkable unity. If the complexity of mental phenomena is be- wilderingly great, the unity of consciousness is striking and unique. Many disputed questions may be raised touching the essential nat- ure of this unity, the means we have for recognition of it, and the inferences which may legitimately be drawn therefrom. Some of these questions will be merely alluded to at this point, and their further consideration postponed until later on. All developed forms of consciousness involve an attribution of the present -particular state of consciousness to a subject of the state. It is for this reason, as has already been remarked, that we express each state of our consciousness by saying : "/am in such or such a condition ; " "/feel thus and so ;" "/ see, or hear, or smell, or taste, or think, or plan," etc. Such language and all language de- signed to describe our mental phenomena is such plainly shows that some kind of distinction is made by everyone between the state and the "ego" which is the subject of the state. It is no adequate explanation of this fact to say that by the subject, in all 608 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. these sentences (the "I" to which the states are attributed), we mean to denote a mere concept of myself formed upon the basis of past experience. Such a concept may indeed be formed. Its completeness and correctness furnishes an excellent test of the amount of development attained by each individual in self-knowl- edge. Few individuals, however, would be found able to give a statement, at all satisfactory to themselves or to others, of just what characteristics are to be considered peculiar to their "self -hood." We do not, then, merely designate the "self" when we thus con- stantly refer to the " I " which is the subject of each state. Our knowledge that the state is our state, or that we are in this definite individual state, is perfectly clear and immediately conclusive with reference to all the experience we have or can remember. The clearness and imrnediateness of the reference which we are continually making of our states to the subject of them all is in marked contrast with the obscurity and indirect nature of the con- cept we are able to form as to what manner of persons we are. Moreover, all the ability we have to frame a concept of the " self " is dependent upon this constant, primary, and inexplicable fact of a possible reference of each state to the subject of the state (the "I"). To explain this reference, we have to assume that it has already been made ; we have to assume it in each attempt at ex- planation. We may express the absurdity of the effort to think or imagine ourselves out of the reach of this form of all consciousness by asking ourselves such questions as follow : How can there be a pain, a sensation, a thought, an act of will, that is not somebody's pain, sensation, thought, or act of will ? What is a state of con- sciousness considered as separable, or actually separated, from a subject of such state ? That is to say, no state of consciousness can even be conceived of that does not involve this same reference. There may, indeed, be great doubt whether some of the lower animals ever make any such reference. It may be that the amceba or the oyster can have a sensation that is not, quoad sensation, the conscious state of the amceba or the oyster. As to this we cannot say. But we can say that if such a so-called sensation is possible for any animal, it is impossible for us to imagine it. We cannot imagine what we cannot bring under the unchanging forms of our own consciousness. The force of the foregoing remarks is not destroyed by calling attention to the fact that the attribution of the state of conscious- ness to the subject of the state, to the "I," is by no means con- tinually being made. It is plain that some distinction must here be drawn between being conscious and being se/f -conscious. The KEFERENCE TO THE EGO. 609 crowd intently watching a tragedy in a theatre, or a conflagration, is certainly not unconscious, but is rather in an exalted state of consciousness ; on the contrary, he who is intently watching the spectacle is not at all, or is only in a slight degree, s^f-conscious. There are considerable periods of every day when, so far as we can remember, we have been "conscious" (not being in profound slum- ber or having fainted away), but with little or no reference in con- sciousness of its activities to the subject of them all. Nevertheless there can be no doubt that we are capable of this reference ; that it is found to be involved in every mental state just so soon as we seek to determine the factors of such state ; and that to recognize its being there is essential to any explanation of the nature of mind. 19, All the different mental phenomena of an individual must be regarded as states of one consciousness ; they are all said to occur in the unity of consciousness. There can be no doubt that every person (with the exception, at most, of certain rare cases of so- called double consciousness) attributes all the forms of his con- sciousness to one and the same subject. This is what is meant by saying that he regards them all as his states. We cannot conceive of ourselves as dubitating whether some particular pain or pleasure, or act of memory or of imagination or of will, present in conscious- ness, is to be ascribed to our ego or not. We cannot attribute any such state to some other than our own ego. It is true that in cer- tain cases of disease or lesion of the brain an abnormal condition in this respect seems to occur. The one person sometimes seems to pass back and forth between two mental lives, which are so distinct from each other that they may well be said to belong to two personalities. But reflection upon these abnormal cases only makes the stronger and clearer our conviction as to the unity of consciousness. Living two seemingly distinct mental lives is not possible without its being assumed that each one of the two is lived in the unity of its own consciousness. This would be as true of twenty distinct lives, if they followed each other in the case of any individual as the result of disease of the brain, as it is of two such lives. It is not at all surprising that the fact of the primary unity of consciousness should be inexplicable ; for it is itself the fact im- plied and assumed in all attempts at explanation of other mental facts. Were this the line of thought necessary to introduce at this point, it might be shown that all the unity possessed by " Things " is dependent upon the unity of consciousness. Without memory and judgment there can be no perception of Things. But the bind- 610 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. ing force of memory is dependent upon this unity. We cannot remember that which has not in some form or other been previously present in consciousness, in our own consciousness, in one and the same consciousness as that in which the remembered image is now present. We cannot judge except by uniting two terms in one con- sciousness. Of course, all language as to the unity of consciousness, when carefully examined, turns out to be figurative, and to have no mean- ing except as interpreted over from entities and relations of a material sort into terms of consciousness. By the " unity of con- sciousness " it cannot be meant that consciousness is some kind of an entity which remains one and unchangeable throughout, like those atoms which physical science has supposed to constitute the whole world of material reality. It will be found, however, that no conception can be formed of the unity which is supposed to belong to the atom without involving in it the unity of consciousness. We can, indeed, picture to ourselves a very little bit of extended matter, barely visible under the highest powers of the microscope, which never changes its shape or color, etc., and which always be- haves itself in exactly the same way under precisely similar circum- stances. But this mental picture would itself have any unity be- longing to it only as it existed in the unity of consciousness. It is this unity which makes each " Thing "to be one thing ; it is this unity which imparts to all else that is one whatever unity it may have. W T hen, then, we speak of the unity of consciousness we mean, first of all and chiefly, to call attention to the following primary fact of experience : All states of consciousness involve a reference of the state to an "I," as the subject of the state ; and, in spite of the constant change of states which goes on, so that in reality the same state never recurs, and even the same thing is never twice known, all the states are understood to be states of one and the same subject. This reference and this understanding enter into ah 1 our experience ; they give conditions to experience and make it possible. Whatever changes experience may be conceived of as undergoing, they, as conditions of all possible experience, must be conceived of as remaining. To ask us to try to imagine a mental state or act not involving this reference and understanding, with respect to the unit-subject of consciousness, is to ask us to try to be conscious and unconscious at the same time. The " I " may become unconscious ; that is, the phenomena of consciousness in that connected development which characterizes the individual may cease to exist. But phenomena of consciousness cannot be con- KNOWLEDGE OF SELF INDIRECT. 611 ceived of as occurring without being referable to some one subject as its modes or states. 20. Metaphysics, presuming upon its intimate relations to the " old psychology," has doubtless often made an unwarrantable use of the facts above mentioned. It has often declared that we have an immediate and indubitable knowledge of the mind as one and the same real being in all acts of consciousness. The facts have been interpreted, as though the case stood as follows : I have the power to look within myself, and by thus looking I can discern what I really am. I immediately know (that is, know by the intro- spective act of self-consciousness) that "7" am always, however my states may change, one and the same real being. I am a real, self- identical entity ; and if asked how I know that I am all this, my appeal is to the indubitable evidence of the act of self-conscious- ness. The foregoing metaphysical statement of the case is by no means obviously correct ; we believe it, on the contrary, to be exaggerated and incorrect. In thus overstating the case, there is liability that the case itself will be lost. Consciousness carries with it no immediate knowledge of any real and self-identical being not even of that real being which we call Mind and, with good reason, assume to exist as the ground or permanent subject of mental phenomena. Meta- physics is the science which treats of those assumptions that under- lie all of our experience with what we call "reality." But it treats of assumptions or beliefs such as we find do actually and inevita- bly enter into all our experience. The real existence of " Things," whether of the masses of matter we daily test by the senses, or of those hypothetical beings called atoms which physical science re- quires in order to account for the phenomena, depends upon such assumptions. If it be admitted that we cannot be immediately conscious of ourselves as real unit-beings, we are no worse off than we are with respect to our belief in the existence of any of the so- called real beings of which all men suppose the world to be com- posed. It can also be shown that the case of the mind or soul, with re- spect to its unity as a real being, is made no better by admitting that an immediate consciousness of ourselves as such unit-beings is possible. For let it be supposed that by concentrating all my at- tention upon the present state of consciousness I most clearly and indisputably discern myself as one real being, forming the ground of that state. Let it be supposed that every half- hour in the day I repeat this mental act. It would still have to be assumed, as some- what altogether out of consciousness, that the real being discerned 612 MIND AS CONSCIOUS BEING. in any one of these acts of introspection is one and the same real being as that discerned in all the rest. A real unit-being that should last only while the difficult act of concentrated introspec- tion was taking place would be of no value to serve as a self-con- scious mind. In fact, such a unit-subject of the individual state would have no claim to be considered as a real being at all. 21. The grounds on which depends the assumption, that the subject to which all the phenomena of consciousness are actually referable is one real being, will be considered more in detail at another point. For the present we merely adopt the assumption, provisionally, as much more probable than any which accounts for our conscious reference to such subject, by enumerating certain possible relations into which the masses and molecules of the brain may be thrown as conditions of the empirical unity of conscious- ness. That there is such empirical unity of consciousness there can be no dispute. Dispute itself would assume it. It scarcely admits of more doubt that all physical theories to account for this unity are wholly unsatisfactory. We know, indeed, certain of the physical conditions and concomitants of consciousness. If ox} r gen- ated blood is shut off from the cerebral substance, consciousness disappears. If the blood has floating in it certain drugs, or prod- ucts of the combustion of tissue, consciousness is disturbed. If certain cerebral areas are injured or eradicated, the psycho-physi- cal basis of certain forms of consciousness is altered. Still, all this does not seem to bring us a step nearer a satisfactory physical account of the unity of consciousness. The molecules of the brain are infinitely numerous ; they are made up into structural forms of indefinite number and variety ; the kinds of the relations they as- sume toward each other are indescribably many. Consciousness, so far as we know, has no special centre or seat within the cere- brum ; and if it had, the constituents and activities of that centre would have to be exceedingly manifold and complex. Now, all this is precisely the opposite of what we should expect of a phys- ical structure which should be called upon to exhibit the phenom- ena of many conscious states, all referable to one subject. No help toward solving the problem is derived from calling attention to the fact that the different portions and elements of the brain are all interconnected. The connecting structures only add still fur- ther to its multiplicity and complexity of elements. It would be easier to conceive of an atom as becoming conscious than the cer- ebral cortex. 22. But surely the assumption that one real being is the sub- ject of these states, which are certainly all referable in conscious- MIND A EEAL UNIT-BEING. 613 ness to one and the same subject, is not an impossible one. On the contrary, it is the most natural assumption ; it is the assump- tion instinctively made by men in general. Notwithstanding the difficulties which encompass it as soon as we attempt to define it, or to test the ground on which it rests, we shall find that it is de- fensible and valid. We conclude, then, from the previous considerations : The sub- ject of all the states of consciousness is a real unit-being, called Mind ; which is of non-material nature, and acts and develops according to laws of its own, but is specially correlated with certain material mole- cules and masses forming the substance of the Brain, CHAPTEE II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MIND. 1. A DISTINCTIVE feature of modern science is its endeavor to satisfy inquiry into the nature of the objects of its investigation by a detailed description of their development. In answer to the in- quiry what a thing is, we are invited to listen to an account of how it became what it is. Indeed, the universal process of " Becoming " has been almost personified and deified so as to make it the true ground of all finite and concrete existences. There can be no doubt as to the great fruitfulness and value of this historical and genetic way of studying everything. Any complex existence is cer- tainly far better understood after it has been not simply analyzed into its present component parts, but has also been traced back to its most nearly primitive and undifferentiated stages. The history of the egg explains the bird even more than the nature of the bird explains the egg. Both of the two subjects, with whose correlations Physiological Psychology deals, require for their most satisfactory understanding to be studied by this genetic method. The structure of the nervous system appears in a new light when regarded as the result of a pro- cess of evolution. Beginning with the unimpregnated ovum, by propagation of cells of living protoplasm, by segmentation of larger sections of these cells, by proliferation of cells and separation into layers, the one portion of the germ from which the mechanism of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells is to unfold itself becomes differentiated from the other portions. By vital processes kept up through nutri- tion and resulting in the growth of some areas beyond others, and by mechanical influences at work to crowd forward here or push back there, to fold and tuck and cause to dip or curve, etc., this epiblastic portion develops the system of end-organs, central or- gans, and connecting tracts of nerves. Psychology, also, has felt strongly this modern impulse. It has been forced to confess that its real task is but begun when it has, by introspection, examined and classified the phenomena of adult conscious life. All the mental phenomena undoubtedly have a MENTAL FACULTIES PROGRESSIVE. 615 truly vital connection. Those of the present have their roots in those of the past. The so-called faculties of the mind are neither hard and fixed lines drawn to exclude from internal relation the various modes of its behavior in consciousness, nor are they kinds of activities that spring up, full-formed at once, at different in- tervals in its entire history. Although we can never reproduce in adult self-consciousness the forms of the earliest stages, we can show that these forms differed greatly from those taken in this adult self-consciousness. We can show that the earlier forms must have been much the simpler. For example, an analysis of the presentations of sense shows that the " things " of developed experience are resolvable into certain elements of sensation which the mind has learned to localize. In other words, perception is a result of development ; for " things " are not ready-made products existing, as they appear, outside of the mind, but resultants of mental activities that have to be performed anew so often as the things appear. It is in the evolution of the mind that we find our means for understanding its true nature. Moreover, the character- istics which distinguish one mind from another are to be under- stood as largely resulting from the order and relative prominence of different activities in the development of each. 2. So far as the connection of mental phenomena with the in- creasing complexity of the nervous activities, and with the stored energies and hardening habitus of the nervous elements, affords any explanation of the development of the mind, we have already said all that is necessary. The growth of the mind in the acquirement and arrangement of sensations, in the recalling of ideas, in the forming of judgments about objects of sense, etc., is plainly de- pendent upon the evolution of the bodily members. But the nat- ure of the relation which exists between the mental phenomena and the nervous mechanism, so far as this can be learned by study- ing the development of both, furnishes us with another question. Upon this question, also, the same conflict of view as that to which we have already drawn attention may arise. On the one hand, the attempt is made to refer all the so-called development of the mind to the evolution of the substance of the brain, under purely physi- cal and mechanical causes. This attempt, then, denies that any real unit-being called the Mind needs to be assumed as undergoing a process of development according to laws of its own. It cannot be disputed that many facts of experience tend to strengthen such an attempt. There is a general correspondence, with respect to the complex- ity and quality of the work done, between the different stages in 616 MIND AS A DEVELOPMENT. the development of both body and mind. Nervous system and mental condition are both immature in infancy ; both develop with great rapidity in early childhood, and then more slowly on into adult life ; both it is claimed remain comparatively stationary through the period of man's highest maturity ; and as old age ad- vances, both keep pace in their decline. Moreover, cases of arrested development of brain are cases of arrested development of mind. Idiots are frequently microcephalic ; many of them have brains weighing less than thirty ounces. Degeneracy of the tissues of the cerebral hemispheres is commonly connected with increasing de- generacy of the mind. As the tides of molecular nerve-commotion rise and fall in the nervous mass, so rise and fall the tides of men- tal vigor. A temporary increase of cerebral action, caused by a glass or two of wine, is expressed in the form of mental phenomena by a heightening of imagination, a quickened flow of ideas. What need, then it is asked of assuming any permanent subject of what we regard as mental development, other than the mechanism of physical molecules with its evolution under the control of physi- cal law ? On the other hand, all attempts to account for the orderly in- crease in complexity and comprehensiveness of the mental phe- nomena by tracing the physical evolution of the brain are wholly unsatisfactory to many minds. We have no hesitation in classing ourselves among this number. Those facts of experience which show a correspondence in the order of the development of the body and the mind, and even a certain necessary dependence of the lat- ter upon the former, are, of course, to be admitted ; but they are equally compatible with another view of the mind's development. This other view has the additional advantage that it makes room for many other facts of experience which are very difficult of rec- onciliation with any materialistic theory. On the whole, the his- tory of each individual's experience is such as requires the assump- tion that a real unit-being (a Mind) is undergoing a process of de- velopment, in relation to the changing condition or evolution of the brain, and yet in accordance with a nature and laws of its own. 3. That the development of a real non-material being is im- plied in the history of the mental phenomena of each person mny be argued on two principal grounds. In the first place, it may be shown that the stages and laws of the development of mind do not fully correspond to those which are observed on tracing the evolu- tion of the nervous system. It may also be shown that certain ele- ments necessarily enter into the development of mind, which have nothing like them, or strictly correlated with them, in the evolu- I1EALITY OF MENTAL HISTORY. 617 tioii of the material mechanism. One real being may be dependent on other beings for its starting, as it were, and for certain factors that enter into its growth or furnish the indispensable conditions of its growth. It may thus receive the form and direction of its development, in large measure, from these other beings. And yet this fact gives us no right whatever to refuse to such a being all title to take rank among other real existences with a complex nat- ure of its own. No existence loses or impairs its claim to reality by being dependent for its development on other existences. The mind, on the contrary, most indubitably establishes such a claim, because the stages and laws of its unfolding, and some of the factors which necessarily enter into this unfolding, are peculiar to itself (swi generis). 4. That the words, "development of the Mind," stand for a real process, there can be no reasonable doubt. The sum-total of the conscious experience of each individual is something far more than a mere series of states of consciousness. No difference in de- grees under the same kind can be conceived of which is greater than the difference between the most mature and highly developed mental performances and those inconceivably simple activities with which the mental life begins. So far as the character of the phe- nomena of consciousness is concerned, the mind of the adult New- ton or Kant is much farther removed from the mind of the infant Newton or Kant than the latter is from the mind of one of the lower animals. There is much more which is companionable and mutually intelligible between the adult man and his dog than be- tween the adult man and his newly born child. The latter is, however, raised at once above the most intelligent animal when we consider the possibilities of its mental development. What the human being is cannot be at all adequately described without con- sidering the nature and limits of that process of becoming which belongs to it. There is no doubt, also, that the incomparable improvement of the mental processes which distinguishes the adult from the infantile human being is a true development. Each stage of this improve- ment is dependent upon preceding stages. The changes are all in some sort according to a plan. Thus the life of every individual's mental experience is capable of being made into a history. A cer- tain tolerably uniform order in the relative development of the dif- ferent faculties is discernible. At first the senses are awakened to a lively and varied activity ; then memory and imagination become more prominent ; and, finally, judgment and the reasoning powers assert their sway. Gradually, things become known and conduct 618 MIND AS A DEVELOPMENT. shaped under principles which are assumed to have a universal validity as so-called general laws. The history of the mental life of every human being, from the cradle (or even from its embryonic existence) to the grave, has all these characteristics of unfolding itself in a regular order, in which all that comes at all comes in due sequence and acknowledged dependence upon what has pre- ceded. This is the very essence of a true development. 5. Can the development of the mind be explained as merely the resultant or expression of the physical evolution of the nervous system this system being regarded as situated in the rest of the bodily environment, and surrounded by the more extended envi- ronment of the world of active physical energies outside ? Against an affirmative answer to this inquiry stand many facts and laws of all such mental development. In spite of what must be said con- cerning the striking correspondence between the evolution of the bodily organism and the development of the mental powers, it must be held that there are marked divergences as well. At cer- tain epochs of life the evolution of the brain seems to stand far in advance of the mind ; at others, the mind appears to have over- taken and passed by the stage reached by its physical substratum. During a long period of life the growth of mental powers is con- stant and solid, while the growth of the physical basis has nearly ceased, and such changes as are taking place in it appear quite inadequate to serve as correlates for the mental growth. More- over, the most distinctly typical features in the development of the mind remain the same when malformation or disease or accident have largely changed the physical evolution of the brain. 6. We have no sufficient means for deciding how far the mental life of the human embryo keeps pace with its organic evolution. We do not even know beyond doubt that the embryo has a mental life, in the only tenable meaning of the words that is, a life of conscious states. But it is probable that its antenatal movements are not all purely reflex, and neither accompanied nor directed by conscious sensation, feeling, and volition. The mental life of the embryo, if it exist at all, can hardly be more than an irregular and fitful succession of the lowest and least compjex mental phenomena. Taste, smell, hearing, and sight are, of course, not to be thought of as entering into such a mental life. Touch, as we understand the word to express the localized sensations of pressure which arise through the practised organ of the skin, is scarcely more likely to belong to the human embryo. Obscure feelings arising from changes in its relation to the surrounding tissues and fluids of the mother, or from disturbances in its own internal organs, and result- THE AROUSING OF THE MIND. 619 ing equally obscure feelings of innervation, as its limbs are moved, must constitute the great part of its experiences. As yet there is no experience, properly so called ; no perception of things, no feel- ing of self, no discrimination of ego and state. Yet long before the child is born it possesses a wonderfully elaborate nervous mechanism, far surpassing in its grade of evolution the nervous system of the most intelligent adult animals. Previous to birth this nervous mechanism must also be constantly in action in a highly complicated way ; it is engaged in supervising the processes of nutrition, and in the reflex and automatic activities which are expressed by the changes of the child's position within the womb of the mother. The mind, however, is as yet unawakened ; this is not because the nervous mechanism is not complex and active enough to serve as the physical basis of a rich mental development, but because the kinds of sensation visual, tactual, auditory, etc. which start and furnish and direct this development have not yet been supplied. The mental life cannot then be said to have kept pace before birth with the evolution of the brain, or with its dis- tinctive activities. On the contrary, it is far behind the stage al- ready reached by its physical support. It waits to be aroused and set to its own work of combining and interpreting those sensations which are to serve as its chief means of early culture. For the first few weeks of infancjr the same relation between the relative development of the body and soul of the child is maintained. Both are subjects of a rapid growth, but the former is still much in advance of the latter. The newly born infant is, in respect to the condition of its nervous system, much the most highly organized and fully equipped of all young animals ; but as judged by the number and quality of its volitions and perceptions, many other young animals are less stupid and insensate. If we may represent its mental condition by anything conceivable through the adult imagination, the human infant is in a dreamless sleep occasionally interrupted by instants of unlocalized and unmeaning sensations. The cavity of the infant's tympanum is filled with a fluid, the place of which is only gradually taken by the air. Sensations of sound, if they arise at all, must be at first only occasional and faint. Binocular movements of the eyes in the direction of bright objects take place early ; and it is through sensations of light and color that the first activities of the mind in perception are aroused and controlled. But for some weeks there are only sensations and impressions, without time perceptions ; there is as yet no knowl- edge of any " Thing." This earliest relation of mind and brain, with respect to the degree and rate of their development, is not 620 MIND AS A DEVELOPMENT. favorable to any form of the materialistic theory. It rather favors the view that the mental phenomena belong to another principle than any material substratum. The dependence of the mind on the brain is indirect and through the sensations (chiefly of sight and touch) which must be furnished to the mind as the primary factors in its development. The halt in the development of mind at first, and its distinct backwardness with respect to the relative stage it has reached, are due to a lack of such sensations as have the characteristics of spatial series (see Part II., chap. VI.), and so are able to stimulate the mind, and afford it the requisite material for the construction of true presentations of sense. 7. Within a few months after birth the child has undergone an enormous mental development ; it has become a mind, in some inchoate way recognizing itself as the subject of states, and per- ceiving a little surrounding world of objects of sense. It has also begun to attend to the objects presented in consciousness, and to direct its attention by voluntary choice. The mind's relating ac- tivity has been aroused ; and acts of memory, discrimination, and judgment, as the basis for those concepts which require articulate language to express them, are repeatedly taking place. The as- sumptions of reason, as involved in all human experience of things, and of their action and reaction upon each other, are found to be shaping the growth of the mental powers. As accompanying and forming the ground for this sudden blos- soming of the mind in the use of its conscious powers, there is a continuous and yet diminishing monthly increase of the substance of the brain. No new organs are formed within the cranial cavity ; but those which have been formed previous to birth are further developed under the changed conditions of nutrition. In respect to the quantity and arrangement of its molecules, the nervous mech- anism certainly undergoes no development during the first year of the child's life which at all corresponds to, or accounts for. the development of the child's mind. It may be claimed, however, that the most important develop- ment of the nervous mechanism has been overlooked in the fore- going description. This development does not consist so much in the increased quantity of the brain's substance, or in the more intricate arrangement of its elements with relation to each other. It consists rather in the forming of what has already been alluded to (Part II., chap. X., 18 f.) as " dynamical associations " among the existing elements. The statement that such is the nature of the developing activities of the nervous mechanism, and the as- sumption that such activities are an indispensable physical condi- FORMATION OF ASSOCIATIONS. 621 tion for the growth of the mind, may both be taken for granted. But even then the argument is far from complete upon which the development of mind as a real being, with a nature of its own, and with a history controlled by its own laws, is denied. The forma- tion of the so-called "dynamical associations" among the mole- cules of the nervous mass furnishes no adequate account of the development of mind. This development is not in the direction simply of associating together states of feeling, each one of which has an exact physical correlate in a physical association among the molecules of nervous substance. It is rather a development which for its very existence requires something different from such asso- ciations. The child might go on forever merely associating together affections of its own mind in correspondence to dynamical associa- tions among the nervous molecules, and yet have no growth of ex- perience such as it actually attains. The fact is that within a single year, or within two years, the child has learned to know "Things." to attend to some in preference to others, to refer its states in some crude way to itself, to form concepts and judgments by the mind's relating activity, and to underlay the world of its sensuous experience with another world of assumption respecting certain non-sensuous realities. To account for this boundless ex- pansion of the activities of consciousness, with its surprising new factors and mysterious grounds of synthesis and assumption, by proposing an hypothesis of "dynamical associations" among the particles of nervous substance in the brain, is a deification of im- potency. So far as we really know anything about the development of both brain and mind, we are compelled to say that the latter, when once started by the sensations furnished through excitation of the former, proceeds to unfold its activities with a rapidity and in an order for which no adequate physical causes can be assigned. During the period of young manhood, or young womanhood, the dependence of the development of the mind on that of the body is most strikingly seen in the influence over the emotions and imagination from the sudden unfolding of certain bodily organs and powers. The indirect influence of these acts of feeling and imagination upon the more purely intellectual progress of the mind is, of course, correspondingly great. But the dependence of mind on body is by no means such as to favor the view that there is no ground in a real being, other than the brain, for the order and rate of the mental development. This same statement is emphatically true of the long period of maturity which constitutes what we call the " middle life " of man. During this time the nervous matter undergoes scarcely any dis- 622 MIND AS A DEVELOPMENT. cernible development. Nothing that microscope or electrometer can detect distinguishes the brain of the man of twenty-five from that of the man of fifty. A few grammes of weight have perhaps been added to it during this long period of years. Anyone is at liberty to speculate as to the immense development of so-called "dynamical associations" which has taken place during the same period. We are far from denying the possibility of such develop- ment. But the fact that a large development of mind may have taken place during the same period cannot be denied. If it be true that large numbers of mankind remain mentally stationary for most of their adult life, this truth in no way favors a materialistic view of the development of mind. Most observing persons will rightly find the chief account of the failure of mental growth in precisely those kinds of mental activity which least admit of being explained by physical analogies. It is from want of mental curiosity, attention, careful and comprehensive judgment, sound moral pur- pose, etc., that most men fail to develop during adult life in their mental powers. And these are mental activities for explaining which no one as yet has been able to conjecture any analogous or corresponding class of cerebral changes. Many minds, however, not only make vast acquisitions, but also experience a large unfolding of mental capacities during the period of middle life. How mature and wide-reaching do the judgments of some men then become ! How profound the insight into the most abstract and difficult speculations comes to be ! What cere- bral evolution shall be conceived of as being the only true cause, and the exact physical correlate, of the mental development of Kant during the years preceding the appearance of the "Critique of Pure Reason," or of Newton while he was unfolding the calculations and conjectures of the "Principia?" To hold that the changing mole- cules of the brain-substance of these thinkers were the sole subjects, really being and acting in the unrolling of these great dramas of human speculations, involves an astonishing credulity. On the contrary, we seem compelled to affirm that no important activity, or law, or fact, in the order of such mental development, fails to demand the assumption of a real and non-material unit-being, un- folding its powers according to its own nature, although in de- pendence upon certain elements and conditions furnished through the brain. 8. Advancing old age is doubtless, as a rule, characterized by a simultaneous decline both of certain mental and of certain bodily powers. In this period of life, however, the correspondence be- tween the changes in the character of the phenomena of conscious- THE FINAL MENTAL STAGE. 623 ness and the altered vigor and quality of the nervous mechanism is not such as to suggest that the two have an altogether common basis. In healthy normal old age the course of the mental life is distinguished chiefly by the dropping out or diminished action of certain factors that are relatively prominent in youth. The circu- lation is slower ; the vital energy is declining ; the muscles are less promptly and completely under the control of the volitions ; the end-organs of sense are less sensitive under impressions ; and certain emotions and passions whose physical basis is of the most obvious sort become greatly modified or disappear. As to the marked effect of these bodily changes upon the mental development there can be no doubt ; and if the previous mental development has been chiefly along lines indicated by organic activities the apparent decay of mental vigor when the physical basis begins to fail is, of course, also most plainly marked. On the other hand, there are many other cases, where no notable difference can be detected, or even fairly assumed, in the course of the psychical evolution down to the " feebleness "of old age ; where the course of mental development continues substantially undis- turbed in all its most important features. The mind of the culti- vated old man, with calm and broad judgment, with refined kind- liness and fixed moral principles, is not to be spoken of as suffering a decline which keeps pace with the failing of his physical powers. It may justly be claimed that the final period of human life, on the whole, favors that theory which regards the mind as by no means wholly conditioned upon the brain for the character, order, and laws of its development. 9. The same general view of the development of mind, which is most consistent with the facts of the different stages of life, is also favored by consideriDg those sudden checks or changes in the course of this development that are caused by disturbing or de- stroying considerable portions of the nervous matter. The phe- nomena which follow experimental extirpation of the substance of the brain in the lower animals, and loss of it by serious lesions in the case of man, do not favor a materialistic theory of mental de- velopment (see Part II, chaps. I. and II). Extensive losses in certain areas of the cerebral hemispheres are often followed by no appreciable disturbance even of any sensory or motor activity. When lesions are followed by such disturbance, their effects may in time wholly or partially disappear. When such disturbance is permanent, it is not necessarily connected with loss in the power of judgment, in the higher intellectual, aesthetic, and ethical activi- ties of feeling, intellect, or will. Even where aphasia is so severe 624 MIND AS A DEVELOPMENT. as to include the loss of all power to utter or understand articulate language, the patient may still show a good degree of mental acute- ness by ability to make calculations or play games of skill. On the other hand, the much more serious interruption or com- plete loss of mental development may occur when no adequate ex- planation can be detected in the disturbance or arrest of cerebral development. It is, of course, natural to conjecture that, in all this latter class of cases, more accurate information would show us some diseased condition of the brain as the physical antecedent of the mental defects. We know that subtle changes in the character of the blood-supply, such as we have no physical means whatever for detecting, are often the causes of most profound changes either temporary or more permanent in the train of ideas. None the less, however, do both classes of cases above mentioned favor the theory we are advocating, rather than the so-called materialistic theory of mind. 10. All the foregoing considerations suggest the conclusion that the mind is primarily and chiefly dependent in its develop- ment upon the nervous mechanism for furnishing and directing the combination and order in recurrence of those sensations which enter into all presentations of sense. Let any person of normal and sane brain and mind consider how intimate and extensive is the connection between his sensations and his whole mental devel- opment. Fickle and confused experience of sensation involves fickleness and confusion of judgment on all matters of sense. Loss of any class of sensations, as a whole or in part, involves a distinct impairment of mental powers. Such loss necessarily changes to a considerable extent the character of the subsequent mental life. Such loss, however, is regularly compensated for, to some extent, by an increase of mental activity along the lines which remain open to the mind. The man blind from birth can never have the same course of mental unfolding, with respect to his perceptions of things, his idea of space, his feelings before the beautiful, etc., as that open to his more fortunate fellow. But he is not necessarily inferior in mental capacity and activity ; because the development of his mind, as conditioned upon the other senses, proceeds with the ordinary pace, although along a different path. The mind is absolutely dependent upon the nervous organism for its awakening and furnishing in the life of conscious sensation. The case of Laura Bridgman, and others similar, show how large mental development is possible with even a greatly diminished out- fit of the senses. But, of course, if touch and muscular sensation, as well as smell, taste, hearing, and sight, were lacking, no con- RELATION OF THE FACULTIES. 625 scious mental life would be possible in any form known to human experience. The form in which the sensations shall combine, and the time-order of their recurrence, are also dependent upon the character, number, and succession of the cerebral excitations caused by external or internal stimuli. But when once the mind is started upon its career of unfolding its powers, it maintains a relative independence of its physical basis. Not that sensations and resulting presentations of sense, together with the reproduced im- ages of such mental products, do not always continue to furnish indispensable factors and conditions of all mental development. In the most abstract thought, and in the highest nights of the im- agination, the mind never wholly gets away from the world of sen- sation and perception, with its immediate dependence upon the activities of the physical and nervous basis. On the other hand, the course and extent of its unfolding are such as to show that its stages and laws do not all correspond to those which characterize the evolution of this basis. Its general dependence upon such basis, in all its development, is through the sensations and their reproduced images. 11. Several references to the second argument (comp. 3) for our view of the development of mind have already been made. This argument is based upon the fact that certain indispensable elements enter into the development of mind which have nothing similar to them, or strictly correlated with them, in the evolution of the ma- terial mechanism. The mind can, indeed, undergo no development except as conditioned upon these elements. But the elements themselves cannot be regarded as the expression in consciousness of merely physical causes, or as flowing necessarily from more primitive activities of the mind which may possibly be regarded as the expression of such causes. All three of those fundamental forms of activity which are recog- nized in the ordinary threefold division of the soul into faculties namely, acts of feeling, acts of knowledge, and acts of will neces- sarily enter into the development of the mind. Its development consists in the unfolding of these three classes of acts, in their mutual dependence and according to the laws which belong to each. Among each of these three great classes of acts there are certain subordinate kinds that defy all attempts whatever to correlate them with the changes in the nervous mechanism, or to explain them as necessarily or actually arising out of such physical changes. Such are the feeling of moral obligation, the sentiment of justice, the love of truth, and certain of the higher aesthetic feelings. Among the acts of knowledge, such are the mind's relating activity, its use 40 626 PSYCHICAL FACTORS SUPREME. of the principle of reason and consequent in drawing deductions, its confident assumption that similar phenomena are signs of like realities, and that the world of sensuous individual experience is but the manifestation of an invisible world of real beings, with per- manent properties and forces, acting and reacting under law. Such, also, are the acts of deliberate choice among courses of con- duct, under the influence of moral considerations the acts of "free will " in the highest sense of the term. Not one of the higher acts of feeling, knowing, or willing, so far as its sui generis character is concerned, admits of being correlated with, or represented under, any of the conceivable modes of the motion and relation of molecules of nervous substance. Certain sensations and perceptions connected with the rise and growth of the higher forms of feeling have, undoubtedly, a physical basis ; but such basis is not assignable to the feelings themselves. Sen- sations and perceptions, which are resultants (in some meaning of the word) of physical processes, are discriminated by judgment and made the basis of deductions and inductions. But admitting this does not one whit the better enable us to conceive of a physical process which can account for the sui generis character of the re- lating activity itself. Acts of " free will," so called, always take place under certain conditions of sensation and perception, as well as of desire ; but the physical correlates of these conditions can in no respect be conceived of as being also correlates of the conviction that the choice is responsible and free. Now, if such activities as the foregoing do actually constitute indispensable elements of mental development and it is obvious that they do this development cannot properly be accounted for by assigning it to a mass of nervous matter undergoing a physical process of evolution, after the manner of the growing human brain. Such development rather implies a real being of another than the physical order. This being must be thought of as stimulated by the rise and recurrence of sensations and images of past sensations, to unfold its own activities as conditioned by its own inherent powers. Like every other real being, the history of its unfolding is dependent upon the relations in which it is placed to other real beings ; but it is nevertheless a history determined also by what the being is. 12. The trial will doubtless be made to escape from the con- clusions hitherto reached, by means of help derived from a certain psychological theory of the development of mind. It may be ad- mitted that the attempt to find, directly, an adequate physical basis for all these so-called higher faculties, or modes of the behavior of MECHANICAL THEOEY OF MIND. 627 the mind in its development, must be abandoned. But the higher faculties themselves it is said are to be regarded as develop- ments of the simplest activities. These highest faculties of all may then be directly connected with the evolution of the body, or of the cranial mass, through the simplest mental activities. In this way a kind of necessitated psychical mechanism is set up, which is itself entirely explicable as a development from one kind of element (the sensation) ; and then, by regarding this one kind of element as connected with the motion of nervous molecules in a purely mechanical way, the need is obviated of supposing any real being called Mind as undergoing a process of mental development. For example, it may be claimed that the one simple and undif- ferentiated element of all psychical experience is the "nervous shock." This nervous shock is merely the simplest expression or result in consciousness of a nerve commotion set up by the action on the nervous mechanism of external or internal stimulus. By differentiation and combination of the nervous shocks, the so-called simple sensations arise. By reproduction of similar combinations of fainter shocks, the images of memory are produced. By " ag- glutination " and " agglomeration " of the sensations and ideas, judgments take place only, since some new kind of idea does cer- tainly seem to be involved in the essence of judgment, it must be held that a "feeling of relation" is somehow slipped in between the agglutinated and agglomerated sensations and ideas. By still more elaborate groupings of the simple ideas, systems of thought and so- called ideas of the highest order of abstraction like the ideas of space, time, etc. come into mental being. In the foregoing way, all the so-called mental processes that con- stitute the development of the mind are strictly correlated, under laws analogous to those which control the relations of physical ele- ments, with the processes that go on in the nervous system ; thus so-called " psychology " results in bringing the mind of man into the same strict subjection to the energy of outside nature, under the law of the conservation and correlation of energy, that charac- terizes all the phenomena with which modern physical science is accustomed to deal. The above-mentioned theory is doubtless admirably simple and thorough-going. But its somewhat extreme simplicity and thor- oughness constitute very important objections to it. In so crude a form it scarcely deserves detailed consideration. It is enough in this connection to call attention to the fact that the theory is built throughout upon unverified assumptions ; and that, even granting its assumptions, it affords no adequate description whatever of the 628 PSYCHICAL FACTORS SUPREME. real process of human mental development. No theory of nerve- commotion has yet been devised to connect it with the external stimuli under the law of the conservation of energy. If by " ner- vous shock " be meant a psychical event, the break between such shock and the nerve-commotion which is its antecedent is absolutely impassable ; no physical energy, under the general law of its con- servation and correlation, can pass this break. Moreover, there is no actual or conceivable psychical event cor- responding to the undifferentiated nervous shock. Sensations are always, as such, and from their very nature, of this or that definite quality. An undifferentiated psychical element is a pure abstrac- tion. Nor do sensations and their remembered images constitute such existences that they can be spoken of as " agglutinated " or " agglomerated." The so-called " feelings of relation," slipped in between the single ideas and sensations, if by this be meant any- thing less than relating activities of the mind, are absurdities in no way fitted to explain or represent the act of judgment. And, finally, this entire account of the course of mental evolution is an utterly inadequate description of what actually takes place in the history of even the poorest and weakest human minds. 13. All theories of the mental development which account for the different so-called faculties and stages of the growth of mind as though they flowed necessarily from some one fundamental activity are inadequate and misleading. The mind is indeed a unit-being, but its unity is not of the kind alleged by these theories. Its dif- ferent constitutional modes of behavior are not to be resolved into each other, or into any one most primitive activity ; nor do they all necessarily flow forth from such a primitive activity. They manifest the rich variety of the mind's nature. They do, indeed, preserve a certain order in time with regard to the relative amount of their unfolding. The different periods of life are characterized by dif- ferent stages of mental development ; these different stages of men- tal development are characterized by a relative prominence of partic- ular faculties, or modes of the behavior of the mind. But because such a time-order is followed in the development of the mind, we can by no means conclude that the faculties latest developed are any the less native and essential to the character of the mind. Nor is it true that these latest and highest faculties can be explained as mere developments from, or modifications of, the earlier and sim- pler. Strictly speaking, none of the faculties, or constitutional modes of the behavior of the mind, admit of being explained as mere de- velopments of other faculties. This is true even of those minor NO DEDUCTION" OF FACULTIES. 629 forms of activity which it is customary to class under the same fac- ulty. That I have the sensation " red " is no reason why I should have the sensation " green ; " and that I have the sensations "red " and " green " is no reason why I should also have the sensation " blue." Neither does the existence of all these so-called funda- mental color-tones, of itself, form any reason why the mind should be affected with any of all the thousands of sensations supposed to be compounded from them. None of these color-tones, psychologi- cally considered, can be regarded as a development from the fun- damental color-tones. That I am affected with a certain sensation of color, lying at the bottom of the spectrum's scale, when several billion vibrations of ether strike the retina, and with a qualitatively different sensation when the number of vibrations is increased by several billions more, cannot be explained as an evolution. The same remark holds within the limits of each of the other senses. Their scales of quality are not such that experiences at one place of the scale can be evolved from those at other places of the scale. Some of them, such as smell and taste, do not admit of being re- ferred to any form of a scale or diagram representing relations of quality. The feeling of heat is not another phase of the feeling of cold ; neither of the feelings of temperature is to be explained as arising out of feelings of pressure or motion. When the sensations of the different senses are compared with each other, the impossibility of considering any of the classes as developing from any other becomes yet more apparent. That a sentient being has an experience of hearing musical tones which rise in pitch as the number of acoustic vibrations varies from thirty to thirty thousand is no reason at all why the same being should have an experience of seeing colors that change their " color-tone " as the number of light-vibrations varies from about four hundred billions to about seven hundred billions. In the development of the mind, the senses may actually awaken in a certain order more or less defi- nitely fixed. But this is very different from holding that they develop out of each other, or that they are all developments of some undif- ferentiated sense-element, the psychical correlate of the nervous shock. Moreover, our percepts, or knowledges of " Things," cannot be regarded as mere developments of sensations. That a sentient being should have sensations of sound and smell and taste, and even of light, color, temperature, and pressure, is not of itself a sufficient reason for its having perceptions such as belong to human experi- ence. The only way in which such perceptions can be regarded as the necessary resultants of the sensations which enter into them as component parts is by taking the nature of the mind into the ac- 630 PSYCHICAL FACTORS SUPREME. count. But this implies that perceptions are not developed forms of sensations ; that they are rather advanced forms of the activity of that real being which is developing under the experience of sensation elaborate products of the synthetic activity of mind. 14. The knowledge of things by perception involves the activ- ity of the mind as memory and judgment. But acts of memory and judgment are not developments from perception ; they are not merely modified forms of sensations as recurring or combined under the action of physical antecedents. All talk about the "im- age " of memory as though it were merely a faint or faded-out im- pression of sense is quite unavailing ; it does not hit the real point of inquiry, and consequently does nothing to explain the mystery (comp. Part II., chap. X., 18 ff.). The vital element in memory, that which makes it to be memory, is neither a sensation, nor a modified form of sensation, nor a development of sensation. The same statement is true of judgment. The relating activity of mind, the power to bring two objects together in the unity of consciousness, and, while keeping their ideas distinctly separate, to bind them into one under the mental affirmation of their likeness or unlikeness this is a new and start- ling mode of the activity of mind as contrasted with merely being affected in sensation. Minimize it as we may, we cannot look upon this activity as a mere " resultant " of two sensations or images of sensations arising simultaneously in the mind. We cannot consider judgment under the principle of the conservation and correlation of energy. To treat it as such involves the grossest misapplication of the laws which control the coincidence or conflict of physical forces. Nor are the different forms of the relating activity of the mind concept, judgment, deduction, induction to be legarded, strictly speaking, as developments from each other or from any one mental activity simpler than any of them. They may all, indeed, be consid- ered as modes of the relating activity, because they involve discrim- ination, the discernment of likenesses and unlikenesses. But each one of them involves somewhat more than simple discrimination ; each one involves other elements peculiar to itself. That a sentient being should simply judge, or affirm this of that, is not of itself a sufficient reason why it should also make inferences by syllogistic processes or arrive at general laws by induction. Indeed, the former may belong to many animals which are incapable of the latter. 15. We may properly continue the foregoing line of remarks into the consideration of the mind's most general activities. Modern psychology, we have seen, is accustomed to distinguish faculties of UNITED ACTION OF FACULTIES. 631 knowing, feeling, and willing as belonging to the mind. But it is emphatically true that no one of these three faculties can be regarded as developed from any other one, or from any two com- bined. That a being feels that is, is affected with a state of consciousness more or less pleasurable or painful, and having a characteristic quality is in itself no ground for explanation of its knowing " Things " through sense-perception, and inference. Con- versely, a being is conceivable with the knowledge of an archangel, but without experience of desire, emotion, or sentiment of attrac- tion or repulsion. Such a being would indeed have to attain its knowledge in other ways than those open to us, and we find it difficult or impossible to imagine precisely what such knowledge could be like. But growth in knowledge is a different thing from the unfolding of mere feeling ; and the former cannot be explained as arising out of the latter. Acts of will are, indeed, always actually dependent upon knowledge and feeling, and cannot even be con- ceived of as taking place without this dependence. But acts of will are not mere developments of those acts of knowledge and feeling on which they undoubtedly depend. The act of choice in- volves a new element, an element not to be necessarily evolved from the other activities of mind. 16. We are so accustomed to the action in common, in the unity of consciousness, of all the so-called faculties, that any attempt to account for them as different modifications of one form of energy meets with a favorable reception. Nothing thus far said is, of course, to be construed to the prejudice of the unity of the mind. But, on the other hand, the incomparable wealth in variety of its natural achievements should not escape our notice. From the beginning to the end of conscious life, the forth-puttings of the mind continue. They are all actual concrete events, happenings in consciousness which have no permanent existence and are never twice precisely alike. That they are, however, alike in certain particulars and unlike in others, we can observe in consciousness itself. Indeed, it is upon this fact that the possibility of any orderly progress, any true development of mind, depends. But the different classes of mental activities are not to be regarded as though they could themselves be explained each from the other, as the different stages of the embryo of an animal or of the germinat- ing and growing seed of a plant are successively evolved. The development of mind, therefore, cannot be explained after the analogy of the accretion of molecul.es within a germ, and the resulting division, multiplication, and advancing arrangement of the living cells into separate organs of the entire system. No real 632 PSYCHICAL FACTORS SUPREME. elements of the mind exist which can aggregate to themselves other elements by absorbing them as pabulum, or can grow by arranging the new material thus gained according to the energies inherent in the material already organized. The life of consciousness is a never- ceasing change of states. Yet the result of this change of states is an orderly history, a true development. Such development is not merely the expression of the evolution of the material basis of some of these mental states. For it does not follow the same order or the same laws as govern the material evolution ; and some of its most important factors cannot be regarded as having any physical correlate, or as evolved from other factors which have such a corre- late. The development of Mind can only be regarded as the progres^ sive manifestation in consciousness of the life of a real being which, although taking its start and direction from the action of the physi- cal elements of the body, proceeds to unfold powers that are sui generis, according to laws of its own. CHAPTER III. KEAL CONNECTION OF BEAIN AND MIND. 1. THAT certain uniform relations exist between the mental phenomena and the action of stimuli upon the nervous system, is a most general conclusion of Physiological Psychology. These rela- tions are chiefly concerned with variations which take place in the quality, intensity, combination, and time-order of the states of con- sciousness, as dependent upon the varying amounts and order of different modes of physical energy as applied to the end-organs of sense. But evidence enough exists to show that the more ultimate psycho -physical relations are those which exist between states of the brain and states of the mind. The dependence of mental states on physical events outside of the body, or at its periphery, is gained by means of the central organs of the nervous system. In the case of man, at least, what happens beyond the cerebral hemispheres is significant for the states of consciousness only as the hemispheres themselves are affected by it. What happens beyond the cerebral hemispheres becomes the cause or antecedent of what happens in consciousness, through this portion of the brain. If our informa- tion were sufficient, then, the empirical science of the connection of body and mind would comprise a statement of all the relations which exist between the mental phenomena and the changes with respect to chemical constitution, structural form, and physiological function, which take place in the molecules of the cerebral areas. But even if the conditions were already fulfilled for a complete science of Physiological Psychology, we should scarcely find our speculative inquiries satisfied by this science. The desire would doubtless still be strong to discover some more general statement for the real connection between physical and psychical phenomena. The question would still be raised : What, then, is the one inclusive proposition, or word, or term, which gives the essence of all. the re- lations between the brain and the mind ? It would seem tedious and disappointing to reply to this question by again enumerating all the particulars which psycho-physical science has discovered. Let it be taken for granted that, when lesions happen in certain areas of the 634 MIND AND ITS OKGAN. cerebral cortex, such or such disturbances of the phenomena of consciousness take place ; that when so many molecular vibrations of a given wave-form and intensity occur within the cerebral elements, sensations of a certain fixed quality and quantity arise in the rnind ; that when certain fainter vibrations of like wave-form return in the same elements, reminiscences of the aforesaid sensations are ex- perienced, etc., etc. We are still inclined to ask : What is the meaning of all this ? or, How are brain and mind, actually and in principle, related to each other ? It is in deference to the raising of inquiries of the foregoing rational sort inquiries which are perpetually repeated all the way along the path of psychological research that, we speak further of a real connection between brain and mind. Of course every such form of speech involves the assumption that the mind is a real be- ing which can stand in relation to other real beings, and not merely the formal or grammatical subject of mental phenomena. This assumption has already been made and partially verified. In continuing to make it for the purposes of the present chapter, we shall find it still further verified. 2. Various attempts have been made, from one or another point of view, to sum up in some single word the relations that maintain themselves between the body and the soul. Thus, the body has frequently been spoken of as the " seat " or "organ " of the soul. Looking at these relations from the more materialistic point of view, we have already seen how mental phenomena may be regarded as the " products " or "resultants " or "manifesta- tions " of the functional activity of the brain. More highly figura- tive terms even have often enough been employed. The body has been called the " prison " or " tenement " or " tabernacle " of the soul. Not seldom, also, has the mind been represented as master- ing and controlling, and even " moulding " the body somewhat as the rider subdues and guides his horse, or the worker in clay and metal shapes the product of his toil. One form of the doctrine of " Animism " has held that the mind is identical with the vital principle, which is busy from the very impregnation of the ovum in shaping its increasing molecules according to an unconscious or dimly conscious plan. Much debate has also been held as to whether the conception of " cause " is applicable to any of the rela- tions in which body and soul stand to each other whether, indeed, it must not rather be held that what happens in one is only the " occasion " on which some underlying cause, common to both, operates to produce a change in the other. 3. The inquiry in what sense, if at all, the brain can be said to BRAIN AS THE SEAT OF MIND. 635 be the " seat " of the mind is more easily answered in a negative than a positive way. Nothing but the crudest notions, both of the nervous mechanism and of the mind, would be consistent with any of the more literal and direct interpretations of this word. Few would seriously regard the mind as a special entity, whether con- structed of ordinary material atoms or constituted in ethereal form, that maintains a sitting or other posture amidst the cerebral masses. Nor is it any more correctly conceived of as thinly diffused over the entire mechanism of nerve-cells and nerve-fibres, or as wander- ing about among the nerve -molecules to find its temporary "seat " where occasion seems to require its presence. And, although some of the phenomena of mind and brain perhaps admit very well of being brought under the conception of the atom, acting and acted upon in varying relations to other atoms of kinds different from itself, no essential gain is made by the attempt to regard the mind as in reality an atom. In brief, there is no literal meaning of the words in which we can speak of the mind as seated in the brain. The phrase, the brain is the " seat " of the mind, is, however, very well adapted to raise the whole question of the spatial qualities of the mind, and of its alleged spatial relations to the molecules of the central nervous system. "We shall, then, briefly consider the question in this form. 4. There can be no doubt that ordinary language justifies us in speaking of the soul as in the body, in some sense in which this term does not apply to any other collection of material atoms. The human soul is in the human body as it is not in the bird, the tree, the house, the star. Even that way of regarding the mind's nature which does not hesitate to speak as though it were a thinly diffused and half-spiritualized form of matter, assents to the neces- sity of asserting a special relation in space between it and the body. Hence some old-time philosophies represented the soul in percep- tion as streaming out through the avenues of sense in order to get the sensuous object into its embrace : or else pictured some ethe- realized copy of this object as streaming into the soul by the same avenues. But even such a view of the nature and activities of the mind is based upon the claim that the body is, in some sort, the peculiar dwelling-place, or " seat," of the mind. A correct account of the process by which the world of things becomes known shows that all our experience is connected with the establishing and jus- tifying of this claim. There are no " things " known to experi- ence except as our sensations, or modes of being affected, are both localized and projected e^ra-mentally. Inducements and consid- erations, such as have already been treated in great detail (Part II., 636 MIND AND ITS ORGAN. chaps. VI. and VII.) irresistibly urge the mind to arrange all its phenomena into two great classes phenomena which are qualities of outside things, and phenomena which are mere states of internal experience. But the same inducements and considerations compel us to look upon certain phenomena of the first class as related to our mere states of consciousness in a peculiar way. The world of things outside always (at least in ordinary experience) affects us is perceived by us or modifies our consciousness through the body. The mind is, therefore, said to be in the body. The conclusion from the foregoing general experience is con- firmed by certain experiences of a special order. The feelings of pleasure and pain, which have so immediate and incontestable a value for the life of the mind, are all connected with sensations more or less definitely localized in the body. Hence men say, " My nose is offended by this smell," "My tooth is aching," or "My limb is suffering." So close is the connection between the localized sensations and the painful or pleasurable states of the mind, that the mind actually seems to be suffering in that part of the body where the sensations are localized. When the localizing of sensa- tions connected with feelings of strong " tone " is very indefinite, as it is in cases where the feelings arise from the condition of large areas of the internal organs, the soul seems to be suffering in, and throughout, almost the entire body. Furthermore, both ordinary experience and scientific observation require us to regard the mind as standing under certain special re- lations to parts of the body. The ancients located the soul in the heart or lower viscera, because of certain marked connections be- tween the states of the soul and the condition of these organs. But to speak of the soul as seated in the heart or other viscera plainly applies most pertinently only to the soul as an emotional being ; the obvious connection of the head with most of the more obtrusive sensations tends to confirm us in the belief that the mind, as perceptive, has its " seat " in that region of the body. For reasons already given in detail (see Book II., chaps I. and H and elsewhere), modern scientific researches justify us in narrowing more precisely the local domain within which we can affirm the mind to have its seat. The mind is certainly in the nervous sys- tem, in a sense in which it is not in any other of the systems of the animal body. More precisely yet, it is pre-eminently in the brain ; and, among all the complex groups of encephalic organs, the final and special claim of the cerebral cortex to be the " seat " of the mind is most easily maintained. Here, in this convoluted rind which forms the interlaced " projection-systems " of sensory and NO MATERIAL SEAT OF MIND. 637 voluntary motor-impulses, here if anywhere must it be held that the subject of the states of consciousness has its dwelling- place and home. 5. At this point, however, the results of modern scientific in- quiry become unfavorable to the effort yet more particularly to designate a material " seat " for the mind. The eager imagination having, as it were, hunted the soul down as it retreats inward and upward to the higher regions of the supreme central organs, re- quires some more precise information as to just where in these regions its existence may be pointed out. Is there any one mathe- matical point, or minute area in the cerebral cortex that is most especially of all the dwelling-place of mind ? If so, might it not be properly conceived of as ordinarily remaining at this point to receive the messages despatched to it from the various parts of the periphery ; and as executing its will over those peripheral parts by sending back to them corresponding messages despatched from the same central point ? The pineal gland has undoubtedly lost the significance which Descartes gave to it as the special seat of the soul. But can no substitute be found to take and hold so impor- tant a place ? The answer of cerebral histology and physiology to the foregoing questions is, on the whole, a decided negative (comp. Book L, chap. II., and Book II., chaps. I. and II.). Certain areas of the cerebral cortex do, indeed, appear to have a particular connection with the execution of certain functions of the mind ; the exact nature of this connection, however, cannot as yet be clearly indicated. But the very phenomena on which reliance is placed for establishing the foregoing connection, forbid us to regard the mind, in its special relations to the brain, as limited to any point or small area of the cerebral cortex. Considerable parts of all the cerebral areas can Tpe destroyed without impairment of any of the essential functions or faculties of mind. Moreover, both gross and microscopic anatomy show us that the cortical part of the brain, like all its other parts, is not constructed on the plan of having its uses for the mind concentrated in any one minute cir- cumscribed spot. In any sense in which the mind can be said to have its " seat " in the brain at all, in that same sense, and with equal propriety, may the entire cerebral cortex, with its vast com- plexity of nerve-fibres and nerve-cells, be said to be the "seat " of the mind. 6. And now the puzzling question recurs : What that is intelli- gible can be meant by designating the supreme central organs of man's nervous mechanism as the " seat " of his conscious mind? No one is directly conscious of these organs. The subject of con- 638 MIND AND ITS ORGAN. sciousness is not a being which can be conceived of as " posturing " within or amongst a certain larger or smaller group of material molecules. And yet, plainly, in some sense the mind is to be thought of as in the brain, as it is not in any object outside of the body, or in any of the non-nervous organs of the body (bones, hair, nails, fat, muscular tissue as such, etc.), or even in the remainder of the nervous system. The only solution for such a puzzle as the foregoing if solution it can be called must always consist in calling attention anew to the essential facts of the case. Certain particles of very highly organized chemical constitution, when grouped into nerve-fibres and nerve-cells, and when further associated into organs, may be acted upon by appropriate stimuli. These material particles are locally in the cranial cavity, and, more precisely, in this or that area or organ of the cranial contents. Moreover, a large and important part of the phenomena of consciousness consists in localized bodily sensations of a painful or pleasurable character. To these facts in- vestigation adds the inference as based upon experiment and ob- servation in the case of others, that the localized sensations are themselves ultimately dependent upon the behavior of the afore- said material molecules in the brain. That is to say, we directly localize many of our mental affections in this or that part of the body ; by remote processes of observation and argument we infer that the last material antecedent of them all is the behavior of cer- tain invisible parts of the body within the brain. Therefore we say : The mind is in the brain ; or the seat of the mind is the brain. By this, nothing further can be meant of an assured or intelligible character than the emphatic repetition of the same principal facts ; the sensations which we localize at the periphery of the body, or project from the body in space, all .have a sui generis connection with the condition and action of that portion of the same body which is contained in the cranial cavity. Our modes of being af- fected are directly localized in space outside of the body, or in the various peripheral parts of the body. The part of the body on which the activity of having these percepts is immediately depend- ent is localized by science in the brain. Other activities of mind are probably also thus dependent on the brain. In no other sense can the brain be said to be the seat of the mind. As to the possibility of such a sui generis relation between material elements which exist in space, and the localizing and other activities of a being not to be conceived of as, strictly speaking, in space, only experience is entitled to pronounce. Such a relation is an accomplished fact. The fact is not to be disputed on any ao- MYSTEEY OF THE KELATION. 639 called a priori grounds whatever. Both the dicta which have some- times been made to bear on the case are alike inapplicable. On the one hand, it has sometimes been claimed that a being cannot act where it is ; on the other hand, that a being cannot act where it is not. Nothing, however, can be known as to how and where beings can or cannot act, except through experience of how they actually do act. Building our conceptions upon the basis of facts, we should be inclined to say that beings act upon, and are acted upon by each other, according to their differences in constitution and relations in space. Gravitation keeps constantly before us the example of all bodies acting unceasingly upon each other, in many cases over distances that are immense. The amount of this action depends, indeed, upon the distance over which it takes place ; but the action at all is an instance of beings acting where they are not. When material molecules are approached nearer to each other than a given small distance we at once discover new modes of be- havior set up, which depend upon what the molecules are, and what their condition, etc. New laws, such as those of cohesion and chemical affinity, have now to be taken into the account. But gravitation, cohesion, and chemical affinity are all alike to be under- stood as expressive simply of the regular modes of the behavior of material elements, with reference to each other, under varying con- ditions. All these modes of behavior modern physical science re- duces to motions of various kinds, directions, durations, and veloci- ties. What is true of all material elements is true of those of the brain ; they can do nothing but move. If, then, we are to speak of the mind as having its " seat " in the brain, in a literal way, we must regard it as one among the many molecules or atoms of which the brain is composed wandering (that is, moving in a peculiar fashion) among the others, and so variously acting on them, and being acted upon by them. But if the mind were such a molecule or atom, the only affection it could receive from the rest of the brain-molecules would be to change the kind and direction of its own motion ; the only effect the mind-atom could produce in the material atoms of the brain would be to modify their motion with respect to kind and direction. But it would still be just as difficult as before to understand how the phenomena of consciousness should result from the movement of one atom among other atoms no matter how peculiar in constitu- tion each of these two kinds of atoms (the mind-atom and the brain-atoms) might be. It does not follow, however, that the relation of the mind to the brain is any more ultimately mysterious than that of the molecules 640 MIND AND ITS ORGAN. of the brain to one another. Nor does it form an insuperable ob- jection to the former relation that it is not, like the latter, a rela- tion of changes of position in space. For who shall undertake to affirm that beings which are not extended and movable in space, because their very nature is of another order, cannot exist in rela- tions of any kind to beings which are thus extended and movable ? If the existence of the former kind of beings consists essentially in states of consciousness, this fact does not prevent their dependence upon the changing relations in space of extended and movable be- ings. It is, in reality, in this way that the mind is related to the brain. To speak of the mind as having its " seat " in the brain is to reaffirm the reality of such relations. 7. The term " organ " (or instrument) of the mind, as applied to the body, is particularly calculated to emphasize the relation of the ideas and volitions which arise in consciousness to the control of the muscular apparatus. But the same term may also be used, though with less of propriety, to describe the relation of the brain to the mind in sensation and thought. Thus we may be said to feel or think with the brain, in some manner supposed to be anal- ogous to that in which the workman accomplishes his task by availing himself of a particular tool or instrument. It is obvious, however, that the figure of speech suggested by these terms also will not admit of a literal interpretation. We cannot conceive of the mind as a peculiar kind of material entity which, when it de- sires or wills to move the bodily members in a certain way, lays a clutch as it were upon the nervous substance of the central organs, and so makes the body serve as an " organ " of the desire or volition. Even less are we to conceive of the brain as a complex tool or mechanism which the mind uses in thought and feeling, somewhat as senses and fingers avail themselves of a calculating machine or of a musical instrument. In producing changes of shape and position in masses of matter outside of our own bodies, we ordinarily find it convenient to use some material medium between those masses and the various mov- able parts of our own bodies. We throw up the ground with spade or shovel, cut down the tree with an axe, feed ourselves with knife and fork, etc. We can, by means of much more complicated mechanisms, accomplish a great variety of changes which it would be quite impossible to accomplish without such aid. On the other hand, we sharpen, define, and multiply our sensations and percepts of things in similar manner. The deaf man hears with a trumpet or other acoustic contrivance ; and the scientific observer contrives an instrument for observing the absolutely simple tones as analyzed THE USES OF THE BRAIN. 641 out of the composite clang. With the lenses of his spectacles the man of defective vision sees what would otherwise be invisible ; and with a prism the optician beholds the colors of the spectrum. Remote objects are brought near with the use of the telescope, and very minute objects near by are revealed by the microscope. It is characteristic of all the most skilful use of tools and instru- ments that they come to seem to the observer like a part of his own bodily mechanism. By feelings of " double contact " (see Part II, chap. VI, 31) the workman comes to know, with the chisel, the wood or metal which he is carving just as the blind man seems to extend his conscious life to the very end of the stick he is accustomed to carry. In these cases the mental picture before the practised mind is not that of the hand and the way it must be moved, but of the graving tool and the motion to be imparted to it as though the instrument itself were immediately subject to volition. 8. The conception of an " organ " or instrument may with pro- priety be extended so as to cover the relation which exists between the nervous system and the muscular, and between the central and the peripheral parts of the nervous system. Thus it may be said that the spinal cord and brain move the limbs with the use of the afferent nerves, or that the cerebral hemispheres employ the lower ganglia of the brain in effecting certain co-ordinations of sensation and motion ; it may even be said that the end-organs of sense communicate with the supreme central organs by means of the afferent nerve-tracts and the lower ganglia. All such language ex- presses, correctly enough for popular usage, the undoubted fact that, in the complicated relations of position and motion which are maintained among the different members of the nervous system, a certain order of action is constantly preserved. Changes originate in one part, and are propagated to other contiguous or more distant parts. In such propagation of the changes a regular tract of the advancing motions is assumed always to exist ; and thus the parts that lie between the extremes may be looked upon as means or media as instrumental to the completion of the process. For ex- ample, in quick succession upon a certain idea of motion, and a vo- lition to a definite motion, my arm is raised or my whole body changes its position in space. How can this come about ? To the inexperienced person the result seems to be an " immediate " ef- fect of the will that is, no apparent media or instruments stand between the volition and the subsequent changes in the relations of the masses of the body to other objects. The vulgar persuasion undoubtedly is, that a man immediately 41 642 MIND AND ITS OKGAN. knows himself to be the cause of the movement of his own arms or legs ; that he knows that he can move them if he ivilL Little in- vestigation, however, is needed to discover that such is in no respect the state of the case. A thousand hidden links, any one of which might drop out without our being immediately aware of it, inter- vene between the volition and the actual motion. No one directly knows that one can move as one will ; one knows that one can will, and infers that, if one will, the movement will follow. In tracing the line of physical sequences backward from the motion of the limb toward the arising of the volition in consciousness, we bring it to a termination in a hypothetical nerve-commotion in some (so- called "motor") area of the brain. At this point the line of sequences, considered as a succession of modes of motion, draw- ing constantly nearer to the instant of the volition, comes to an end. The connection beyond and into that state of consciousness which is called a " volition " cannot be conceived of as the pro- gressive propagation of a peculiar molecular motion called nerve- commotion. 9. It is obvious from the foregoing remarks that one part of the nervous mechanism can be said to be the " organ " or instru- ment of another part, in a meaning of the word which cannot prop- erly apply to the relation of the brain and the mind. In a certain justifiable meaning of the word, all the rest of the body may be said to be the organ of the brain. That is to say, those changes in the molecules of the brain's substance which arise there whether because of certain ideas and volitions of the mind, or because of changes in the character of the blood-supply, or of sensory impulses thrown in from the periphery or other lower nervous centres get themselves expressed through the other members of the body. All this system of instrumentalities or interdependent organs is- of one nature. It consists of material particles having a definite chemical constitution, structure, and arrangement in space ; its functions are all modes of motion of such particles. One part serves as an instru- ment or " organ " for another, because the changes in the former effect changes elsewhere, not directly, but through contiguous and connected parts. If the necessary contiguous parts are wanting or their relations disarranged, if the connection is interrupted or destroyed, then the work cannot be done; the "organ," "instru- ment," or " means," is lacking. - What is true of the relations described by the word " organ," as these relations exist between any two parts of the nervous mechanism, is only partially true of the relations which exist be- tween any particular portion of this mechanism and the phenom- THE USES OF THE BRAIN. 643 ena of consciousness. In other words, only a part of the real rela-^ tions existing between mind and brain can properly be described under such terms as "organ," "instrument," etc. The brain, with its appropriate functions, is an indispensable medium between certain changes in the peripheral parts of the body and correspond- ing changes in the states of consciousness. If ideas of motion and volitions to move are to be followed by actual motions correspond- ing to the ideas and volitions, then the brain must act with its ap- propriate functions. The motions can be executed, if at all, only through the brain. As much as this is true of all the efferent tracts which lead from the cerebral cortex through the lower portions of the encephalon, along the spinal cord, and out to the particular groups of muscles. Something more and special is, however, true of the brain. It is the first of the indispensable physical links in the whole chain ; it stands nearest, as it were, to the mind. All the other steps in the execution of the ideas and volitions of the mind depend upon what takes place in the brain. If nothing takes place here, nothing at the periphery of the body will come from the volitions ; if anything wrong takes place here, all that goes on at the periphery will be wrong, and the mind will not get its volitions executed. In this sense, at least, the brain is the par- ticular organ of the mind ; it is the most intimate and indispen- sable means for the execution of all its ideas or volitions of motion. It does not appear that the foregoing statement by any means exhausts the description of the experience, reflection upon which induces us to regard the brain as the " organ " of the mind. For the brain seems to serve as the special physical basis of the ideas and volitions of motion themselves. After experience in moving a particular member of the body has once been gained, that mem- ber may be lost ; and yet if the proper areas of the brain remain unimpaired, the ideas, feelings, and volitions connected with the movement of the lost member will still arise in the mind. The man whose leg or arm has been amputated can still feel it, can form the image of how it should be moved to be in this position or in that, and even will to have it moved. The leg is not, then, the organ of these ideas, feelings, and volitions, f Experiments with animals, by extirpating the cortical areas, and observation of human pathological cases especially, perhaps, in certain forms of aphasia (comp. Part EL, chaps. I. and II.) seem clearly to show that a much more intimate relation exists between the brain and the mind. With the destruction or derangement of certain of its areas, the power even to form such ideas and volitions, or to have such feelings, seems to be impaired or lost. We cannot 644 MIND AND ITS ORGAN. say, to be sure, that the mind has lost a part of its general faculty to conceive, to feel, and to will. It has, however, suffered in respect to its power to frame a certain set of definite ideas and volitions as respects the motion of the peripheral members. This class of facts is certainly calculated to emphasize strongly our conception of the brain as being, in a special sense, the indispensable means through which the states of consciousness are related to changes in the position of molecules and masses of matter. Thus much, then, we are also entitled to include in our declaration that the brain is the " organ " of the mind. There is another most important class of facts which may be par- tially described under the same terms as the foregoing. The brain is the indispensable means for furnishing the mind with its sensa- tions, and so with its presentations of sense or perceptions of things. This statement is not to be understood as though the brain could, of itself, construct the sensations and perceptions and hand them over ready-made, as it were, to the mind. Sensations are states of consciousness, not modes of the brain ; and even when they are synthetically united, localized, and projected to the periphery of the body, or into surrounding space, they are brought under no essentially new relations to the nervous mechanism. Sensations are not nerve-commotions, " etherealized " by the optic thalami and cerebral convolutions, and then handed over to consciousness. Therefore the instrumental relation between brain and mind is not that of transmitting a peculiar kind of motion from one phase into another, or from one being to another. The brain is not the " organ " of the mind in the sense in which a being that starts or receives some mode of motion becomes instrumental for the pro- duction of changes in another being. Nevertheless, no sensations will arise in the mind unless the brain be affected in a certain way. Looking at the chain of sequences as it runs from without inward, we might say : The brain is the organ, or instrument, through which the stimuli of the outside world, acting on the end- organs of sense, finally reach the mind. What is properly meant by speaking of the brain as the mind's organ of sensation is, strictly speaking, to be described as follows : The brain is the last and most important physical antecedent to the mind's being affected with the different sensations. The eye, ear, nose, etc., are popularly called organs of sense. Nothing is more obvious about the whole process of sensation than the part played in it by the peripheral sensory organs. It is apparently through these, by means of these, only on condition of the acting of these, that sensations arise in the mind. Further examination shows, MATERIAL CONNECTION IMPOSSIBLE. 645 however, that the end-organs of sense are more remotely connected with the origin of sensations than might at first be supposed. Excitement of the afferent nerve-tracts between the end-organs and the brain will also produce sensations. If these sensations are not so refined and complex as those which are caused by stimu- lating the end-organs themselves, the reason is to be found in the fact that we cannot stimulate the afferent nerves in the way to pro- duce such sensations except through the appropriate end-organs. Still further examination shows that the value of the stimulus ap- plied to the afferent nerves for the production of sensation is en- tirely dependent upon what the conducting organs convey to the brain, according to their specific nature and appropriate connections. Sensations can be equally well produced by stimulating the cerebral substance directly. When drugs, or gases, or diseases, or increased action of the blood-vessels change the character of the blood -supply, we see, and hear, and feel a world of things that has no existence for the end-organs of sense. The brain is then the "organ" of sensation for the mind, in the sense of being the indispensable and most immediate means for the production of sensation. Nothing that has just been said interferes in the least with the valid claim for the mind, that it alone is the producer of every sen- sation ; or, in other words, all sensations are modes of the behav- ior of a being that is non-material and a unit-being, and is called Mind. When the physical conditions are fulfilled in the brain, and according to the way in which they are fulfilled, the mind itself puts forth the phenomena of sensation. For the sensations are not copies of outside material molecules, whether acting on the end-organs of sense or acting as excited nervous substance in the brain ; it can scarcely be repeated too often they are modes of the conscious activity of mind. 10. Still another class of attempts to generalize, and embody in a single term, the various essential relations of the brain to the mind leads to the inquiry after some one special " connection " or " bond " between the two. How are mind and brain connected? What real tie binds them, so that they are obliged to have re- gard to each other in the modes of their behavior ? Here, again, any too literal answer to this inquiry leads at once to manifest absurdity. A material bond designed to unite mind and brain might perhaps be conceived of as connected with the latter, and yet as remaining material ; but in order to make it connect with the former (the mind) it would have to become non-material, un- less we are ready to concede that the material and the non-material can stand connected without some special bond. In case this con- 646 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. cession is once made, however, we cease to feel the need of a special bond between the mind and the brain. If it be at once admitted that no connection is to be sought, or can be found, between the mind and the brain, beyond the fact that their modes of behavior are mutually dependent, it will not be necessary to appeal to any special mystery. What bond connects together the planets of the solar system so that each one moves in- variably with reference to the position of all the others, and yet in a path peculiarly its own ? We can only respond by talking of the force and laws of gravitation. These " laws," however, are simply a mathematical statement of the uniform modes of the be- havior of certain physical beings ; this " force " is no entity or bond connecting the individuals with each other, as the rods of the orrery bind its parts to a common centre. Did such rods exist to bind the planets to the sun, we should still have to inquire for some bond between the particles of the rods ; and for another bond to unite the atoms into these particles. Nor would it be an answer to such inquiry to discourse of cohesion and of chemical affinity, or of the laws which control the action of those forces. For cohesion and chemical affinity are not special bonds ; they, too, are but expressions for the facts that the elements of material reality, under certain conditions and according to the kind to which they belong, behave as though bound ; these elements be- have, that is to say, according to what they are, and according to the relations in which they stand to each other. No more obscure and unsatisfactory is our knowledge concern- ing the " bond " which unites body and soul, or, more especially, the mind and the brain. The brain is a vast collection of material molecules, connected together in a great variety of ways, which always act, as it were, with their own chemical constitution, and relations to other similarly constituted bodies, fully in mind. Even the molecules are not bound to each other by any one dis- coverable or conceivable bond. So far as we can speak of them as " connected " at all, they are connected by a great variety of bonds. Each of these bonds depends upon the nature of the molecules which enter into it, and upon the manner in which each molecule is related to other molecules. Essentially the same thing is true and perhaps with no more of ultimate mystery in its truthful- ness of the connection between mind and brain. The mind is a conscious being, a being that perceives, feels, remembers, imagines, thinks, and wills. In respect to certain classes of its activities, at least, what it does depends upon what is done by the molecules of the brain with which it is, as we say, specially connected. The con- BODY AS TENEMENT OF SOUL. 647 nection is not, however, such as can be explained by assuming one special form of a " bond " between the two. An infinite variety of relations, some of which are in a measure reducible under law, and others of which elude all attempts thus to subject them, exists between the unit-being called mind, and the composite structure and varied functions of the brain. The connection is no less real, however, because invisible ; no less valuable and certain, because not one bond, but an infinite variety of relations. 11. It will scarcely be supposed that information of scientific value concerning the nature of the real connection between the body and the soul can be obtained from terms which are almost purely figurative and poetic. The limited and defective nature of our sense-perceptions, the misery of much of life, the unrealized longings for knowledge and happiness, and the work of imagina- tion in framing a picture of some state of existence in which the limitations are removed and the longings realized, have led men in all ages to regard the body as the " prison " of the soul. Because the senses are not more in number than they really are, or more far-reaching and accurate than their construction permits them to be, they are regarded as restraining the soul, rather than as bringing it information which has the character of satisfying reality. The brevity and uncertainty of life, and the speed with which accident and disease impair or dissolve the bodily functions, together with the persuasion that the thinking principle will have a continued existence, suggest the reflection: the body is the "tenement "or " tabernacle " of the soul. However true and comforting the foregoing hopes and reflec- tions may be, it cannot be claimed that they throw any clear light on the subject of our investigation. Physiological Psychology rests upon such facts as show a most intimate and unceasing cor- relation between the body and the soul. It can never, therefore, consider the ultimate connection of the two as though it were as unimportant and superficial as that between the prisoner and the prison which holds him, or between the tenant and the tenement or tent which for the time being is his abode. We are not at present engaged in considering the evidence that the mind is immortal, and can exist apart from this body and in another body, if not apart from all bodies ; nor even the proof that its nature is vastly superior to that of all the material structures to which it might be- come related. We are rather testing the assumption that the mind, as connected with the brain, is a real being which, although depend- ent upon what occurs in the brain for its character and the order of its activities, has nevertheless that existence which belongs to 648 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. all real beings a nature and a development of its own. This as- sumption, indeed, is applied and confirmed in every attempt to characterize the real connection which exists between the mind and the brain whether the words "seat," " organ," " instrument/' or other corresponding words be used. 12. Thus far little has been explicitly said as to the propriety of applying the terms of " causation " (such as " energy," " action," "force," "impulse," "effective agency," etc.) to the case of mind and brain. Yet everything which has been said has implied that these terms are really applicable. There would be no advantage to the mind in being " seated " in the brain that is, in being under any special relations to a given extent of nervous matter unless it were somehow influenced or acted upon by this nervous matter, and could in turn influence and act upon it. No " organ " or instru- ment is of any use whatever that is, no thing can become an organ or instrument unless it can be acted upon by that which employs it as an organ, and can in its turn act upon other things. Action of mind on brain is implied in calling the latter the organ of the mind's volitions ; action of brain on mind is implied in calling it the organ of the mind's sensations. To act and to be acted upon is equivalent to standing in the relation of cause and effect. It is not at present necessary to point out in detail how much of obscurity and contradiction are involved in all the more popular ways of mentally representing the foregoing relation. The trans- mission of energy (or force) is popularly spoken of as though such energy streamed off from one body and attached itself to another ; and as though the quantity of energy thus given off were dependent upon the strength of the blow given by one body to another. Let it be supposed, however, that the application of the law of causation to the case of brain and mind is made in the most approved manner. It is simple matter of fact, as tested by thousands of observations and experiments, that changes in the condition and functional ac- tivity of the nervous centres are followed by changes in states of consciousness, in a regular way ; and that, conversely, changes of the latter sort are followed by changes in the relations of the masses of the body, and of the functional activity of nervous cen- tres and end-organs of sense. Now, unless we are ready to be satisfied with simply stating the facts, without making the at- tempt to find any rational account for them, we are obliged to con- sider these correlated changes under the terms of cause and effect. That is to say, we regard the mind as a real being with activities called states of consciousness, and the brain as a collection of real beings called moving molecules of nervous matter, and we as- INFLUENCE OF THE CEREBRAL CIRCULATION. 649 sume that the latter acts upon the former and is acted upon by it in turn. In other words, brain and mind are conceived of as really connected under the law of causation. Were it not for the influence of prejudice derived from specula- tion upon certain philosophical, ethical, and religious questions, no one would think of hesitating to apply the terms of causation to the case of mind and brain. The stoppage of the arteries leading to the cerebrum, by outside pressure or by embolism, is speedily and regularly followed by a disturbance or cessation of conscious- ness. Who doubts that a man loses his senses as truly as he loses a portion of his brain-mass, because he has been struck a blow upon the head ? The falling of waves of light or sound upon the eye or ear, the contact of the hand with the hard substance of the metal or wood, the breathing of the air into the nostrils, are universally regarded as the causes of the sensations and perceptions which follow. The general impression undoubtedly is, that the act of will is the cause of the motion of the different limbs or of the en- tire body. In each of these cases more careful observation results in supplying many links in the chain of causation which the popu- lar account has overlooked. The result is a more minute and careful picture of those molecular changes which take place in the cerebral substance, as induced by the severe shock of the blow or by the gentle stir of the stimulus acting through the end-organs of sense. Science explains the way in which the visible changes in the position of the ponderous masses of the body are due to ante- cedent invisible changes in the molecules of the muscles, of the efferent nerves, and of the lower and the supreme nervous centres. But all this explanation implies the application of terms of causation to the entire chain of physical events ; and if these events are to be considered as in any measure explaining the psychical events with which they are connected in time, the relation of the two classes of events is also assumed to be one capable of statement in the same terms. How impossible it is to avoid speaking of the connection of mind and brain, in terms of causation, may be illustrated by the relations between the condition of the intercranial blood- supply and the states of consciousness. The character of the cerebral circulation is said to have a great " influence " upon the condition of the mind. A slight increase of this circulation, resulting from a small quantity of alcohol or other drugs, or from the hearing of interesting news, produces an increased speed in the mental train. Reaction-time is found to vary with changes in the circulation. In the delirium of fever the wild and quickly moving condition of the thoughts, fan- 650 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. cies, and sensations is a direct expression of the kind of work which is going on, because of the accelerated heart-beat and the disor- dered character of the blood, within the cerebral arteries. Schroe- der van der Kolk tells of a patient who, when his pulse was reduced by digitalis to 50 or 60 beats per minute, was mentally quiet and depressed ; when it was allowed to rise again to 90 beats, his mind was in maniacal confusion. Cox narrates the case of a sick man who, at 40 pulsations in the minute, was " half-dead ; " at 50, melancholic; at 70, quite "beside himself;" at 90, raving mad. The character of dreams is determined, to a considerable extent, by the position of the head and the way in which this position affects the cranial circulation. Hallucinations not infrequently are immediately made to cease, when the person having them assumes the standing posture, or has leeches applied to the head. 13. Objections have arisen from various sources, and have been urged with various degrees of skill and intensity, against applying the conception of causation to the relations of mind and brain. So far as these objections are more purely ethical or religious, it is not consistent with the purpose of the present investigation to consider them. But certain objections are more purely scientific, or per- haps philosophical, upon a basis of observed physical and psycho- logical facts. A brief examination of such objections is not only consistent with the present investigation, but even required by it. Among the followers of the Cartesian philosophy it was held that body and soul cannot really act upon each other, because of the obvious difference in the essential characteristics of the two. The body is extended and material ; the soul, being non-material, does not possess the characteristic most distinctive of all that comes under the conception of matter. Matter and mind, as being in their very essence opposed, are separated from each other by the whole diameter of being. They cannot be regarded as united directly through any real tie, but stand at the mutually exclusive poles of being. That a certain marked correspondence exists between the phenomena of the extended and material body and the phenomena of the conscious non-material soul plainly cannot be denied ; and some account for this correspondence must be given. No one can doubt that his sensations, in their quality and order of succession, are related to certain events in the physical organs of his own body ; neither is it easy to persuade one's self that one's move- ments are not, at least in some indirect way, " ordered " by one's desires and volitions respecting them. To account for the obvious regular relation between bodily changes and mental phenomena, two or three somewhat different THEOKY OF OCCASIONALISM. 651 theories may be proposed. One of these is the so-called doctrine of " Occasionalism." According to this doctrine body and mind do not stand in the relation of cause and effect toward each other ; neither one ever really acts upon the other. But on occasion of some event of a definite kind happening in the bodily realm, a corresponding event of its own definite kind happens in the domain of consciousness ; and vice versa. To say this, however, is plainly in itself nothing more than to repeat the facts of experience over again, but without offering any explanation of them. Since some real " ground " or reason that shall have causal efficiency seems needed in order to explain why body and mind should take "occa- sion " to act at all, in view of each other's action, theology readily finds such ground in the Divine Being. God, it is said, on occasion of an event occurring in either of the two diametrically opposed spheres, causes the right corresponding event to occur in the other sphere. Matter and mind are not causally connected immediately with each other ; they are causally connected only through a com- mon ground in God. Pure Occasionalism, however, seems to make too large demands upon a pious credulity. To be always observing mere "occasions," in order to cause body and mind to keep the right pace with each other, may well be regarded as un- worthy of Divine Being. To meet this difficulty the theory of "Pre-established Harmony " is devised. According to this theory God has eternally predestined the entire succession of events in the world, down to every minutest detail. Body and mind, there- fore, may be regarded as like two clocks which have been so con- structed that, without either having any effect upon the other, they go on exactly as though one were actually moved by the other. It would scarcely be worth while to consider seriously these older forms of the denial that any real causal relation exists be- tween body and mind, were it not for the fact of their essential agreement with more modern forms of the same denial. Two re- marks upon the foregoing theories, in special, are necessary. The assumption that matter and mind are separated from each other "by the whole diameter of being," if it be held to mean that the two forms of being are so disparate in nature as to be unable to act on each other, is an unverifiable assumption. It even goes squarely in the face of many of the most important psycho-physical facts. We know nothing about what kind of beings can or can- not act on each other, except through our experience of what beings do actually act upon each other. The mystery involved in any one being acting on any other is equally deep and unfathom- able, in whatever direction we attempt to explore it. Before ex- 652 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. perience with the facts, we should be quite at a loss to tell whether atoms of oxygen could act on atoms of hydrogen, under the laws of chemical affinity, or not ; whether molecules of iron could act on other molecules of iron, under the laws of cohesion, or not, etc. How it is that material masses or molecules can "influence" each other, or what is the real nature of the force which binds them together, physical science is quite unable to say. So that, even if we were entitled to regard matter as somewhat, the very essence of which it is to be spread out, and mind as somewhat, the very essence of which it is to be conscious and not to be spread out, we should still be quite without justification in asserting (a priori, as it were) that one cannot act upon the other. But just the contrary if we are to accept, unbiased, the obvious witness of the facts, we are compelled to affirm : The phenomena of mind and the conditions of the brain are related so constantly and im- mediately under law, that we are warranted in believing in the action of each upon the other. Moreover, the theory of Occasionalism, Pre-established Har- mony, and all similar theories, do not in the least assist us to es- cape the difficulties which attach themselves to every conception of causation. We cannot regard the Divine Being as bringing about a change in either mind or bod} r , on " occasion " of some other change, without assuming that mind (the Infinite Mind) stands in the causal relation to matter. Furthermore, we cannot conceive of a " reason " why this Being should effect one change rather than another, without regarding Him as subjecting himself to the same relation. 14. It is interesting to notice certain relations, both of similar- ity and of difference, between a prominent modern theory as to the mutual action of mind and brain and the now-abandoned views of Occasionalism and Pre-established Harmony. Modern science raises most of its objections, against regarding the conditions of the central nervous system and the states of consciousness as connected by a real causal tie, out of a profound regard for matter and the laws of physics. The great value and significance of physical phe- nomena, and the regular modes of their recurrence, if not the in- dependent and eternal existence of material beings, are taken for granted by this theory, whatever difficulties, fears, or hopes to the contrary may arise from the sphere of mind. Elements of ma- terial reality (called " atoms ") are assumed to exist ; the univer- sal form of their relation is held to be the law of the conservation and correlation of energy. By " energy " we are to understand that which moves or tends to move the elementary atoms, or their NO TRANSMISSION OF ENERGY. 653 aggregations, into molecules and masses. The energy which is re- garded as causing actual motion is kinetic ; that which is to be regarded as tending to produce motion is stored or potential. But inasmuch as we have no test or suggestion of the presence of en- ergy except motion, we seem compelled to consider the so-called "tendency" to move (potential energy) as motion that is beyond the sphere of the senses, because distributed over so vast a number of minute portions of matter whose amount of motion is too small to be discoverable. All physical elements and masses are, accord- ingly, always in motion, and the total quantum of this motion is invariable throughout the entire universe. All forms of energy must be classified, as respects quality, by the kind of their motion ; and as respects degree, by the amount of their motion. On attempting to account for the whole world of phenomena in terms of motion, kinetic or potential, under the law of the conser- vation and correlation of energy, we are met with insuperable diffi- culty as soon as we enter the domain of consciousness. States of consciousness are not modes of motion. If they were, the general theory of physics would compel us at once to attempt a strict mathematical correlation between physical and mental phenomena. Just as the momentum of masses can be expressed, with a tolerable approximation to exactness, in terms of heat as a mode of motion, so would some formula be conceivable for indicating what amount of chemical changes, or nerve-commotion, in the matter of the brain, is the mathematical equivalent of the conception of home, of the sense of obligation, or of the idea of God. In other words, it seems impossible to regard any amount of physical energy as ab- stracted from the brain, so to speak, and expended or stored up in consciousness. Energy is stored by the process of nutrition in the nervous elements of the brain ; it becomes kinetic in connection with the phenomena of consciousness. But between the mind, whether regarded as merely the formal subject of consciousness or as a real unit-being whose faculty or power it is to be conscious, and the physical basis of mind in the brain, no correlation, no pass- ing back and forth of energy, can occur. Representing the same truth in another way, we may declare : The entire circuit of the transmission and distribution of energy is complete within the brain itself. Not a single atom enters its sub- stance that does not come forth unchanged, with all its forces in- herent in it. No atom is transferred from brain to mind, as all the atoms are transferred from the blood to the nervous substance of the brain. Not the most infinitesimal amount of energy exists, stored in the constitution of the molecules of this substance, which 654 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. is not either used up there or returned to external nature in con- nection with the constitution of the molecules separated from this substance. The stricter we make our application of the law of the correlation and conservation of energy within the physical realm, the more impossible does it become to apply it at all to the rela- tions of body and mind. 15. It is not surprising that, in the estimate of one who is un- accustomed to regard with favor any explanation of phenomena which does not come under the most general law of all physics, the case of the mind and the brain should seem to demand the most extraordinary treatment. In any event, the facts of consciousness, as facts, cannot be denied. Whether we can explain them or not, with or without use of the law of the conservation and correlation of energy, they are equally plain and persistent. Men perceive, and imagine, and remember, and reason, and believe in the invisi- ble, and choose, etc. All this they do, as possessed of a body and, particularly, of a nervous mechanism, the activities of whose central portion are related in some special and unique way with the doing of all this. And yet sure, beyond doubt it is argued is the existence of the atom, with its host of inherent energies ; and supreme is the law of the conservation and correlation of these energies regarded as modifications of one fundamental form. In view of so grave difficulties it has been of late customary to escape from them in one of several different ways. The general claim may be set up that all hopeful inquiry as to the nature of real beings, which act upon and are acted upon by each other under the Jaw of causation, must be abandoned. Knowledge, it is said, con- sists simply in the relating of phenomena under certain constant and regular forms of their recurrence, called "laws." This is sub- stantially the position of Positivism. It may also be held that all mental phenomena are to be re- garded as merely transitory appearances shadows cast, as it were, by the changing activities of the material molecules ; and that the latter are the only realities. In this case the constitution and ac- tivities of the molecules are all to be regarded as determined by the interaction of the ultimate atoms which compose them, accord- ing to their inherent and inseparable forces, under the law of the conservation and correlation of physical energy. Whenever a cer- tain constitution and consequent modes of activity are brought about in the molecules, under this general law, then it is of their own incomprehensible nature to exhibit, in addition to the various forms of motion known as nerve-commotion, another peculiar class of coexisting phenomena, called mental phenomena. The latter MATERIALISM AND MONISM. 655 phenomena do not require a new subject ; their appearance is the necessary result simply of the special and unique constitution and relations of the physical molecules of the brain. The mental phe- nomena are one form of expressing the fact of the real existence of these molecules, with such a constitution and in such relations. And just as we do not require a new subject for the mysterious and unique phenomena of magnetism, or of crystallization, but be- lieve them to be only the expression of the new relations into which the same subjects of all phenomena the imperishable atoms have been brought under the one law of the conservation and cor- relation of energy ; just so do we find no particular need of a new kind of subject, other than the aggregated atoms, for the mys- terious and unique phenomena of consciousness. This position is Materialism. Still further, the impossibility of binding together by a causal tie, under the law of the conservation and correlation of energy, phenomena so utterly incomparable as are those of mind and brain, and the difficulty of assigning the mental phenomena to the same subject as that which, otherwise, manifests itself only as modes of motion rather than modes of thought, have led to more recondite speculation. Hence a return to the "mediasval" view has been made. The real connection of mind and brain has been found in a third somewhat, which is neither mind nor brain, as we know them, but is the ground of both. There is, then it is claimed only one substance as the real subject for the two sets of proper- ties. " The one substance, with two sets of properties, two sides, the physical and the mental a double-faced unity would appear to comply with all the exigencies of the case." This position may, in general, be designated as that of Monism. But immediately the inquiry arises and presses for an answer, whether we may not know something as to the real nature of this "double-faced unity," besides the mere fact that, phenomenally considered, it has two faces, or sides the physical and the mental. Why does it manifest itself both as physical motion and as mental states one Being, in two utterly incomparable modes of manifes- tation? Is it itself extended and movable, a material reality? or is it unextended and conscious, a psychical reality ? To refuse to attempt the answer to this question is to take refuge in Agnosti- cismand that at a critical point, to which we have brought our- selves unnecessarily through having been already overwise. For no one who claims already to know enough about the nature of so- called matter and of so-called mind to affirm confidently that they cannot be two forms of real being, acting on each other and being 656 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. acted upon by each other, is entitled, just beyond this advanced line of knowledge, to make a run sideways into the refuge of con- fessed ignorance. Furthermore, if the " double-faced unity" is held to be, in reality, either matter or mind, we raise again all the diffi- culties as to a real connection between two sets of phenomena so incomparable. Both Materialistic Monism and Idealistic Monism have, then, to undertake the task of showing how the one reality can appear under these two phenomenal forms of being matter and mind with its two sides causally connected. 16. So far as the theories, which are proposed in order to escape the difficulty of admitting a direct causal connection between mind and brain, involve the assumption that the phenomena of conscious- ness can be regarded as modes of motion, or can be attributed to the molecules of the brain as their sole subject, they have already been refuted. So far as these theories resolve themselves into the speculations proposed by different schools of philosophy concerning the supreme philosophical inquiry, What is the nature of the Ulti- mate Keality (the Absolute)? psycho-physical researches have no direct answer to offer to them. But our present inquiry is a more modest one, namely : What is the nature of the real connection between human mind and human brain, so far as psycho-physical science throws any light on such connection ? Our general reply is : This connection is, in reality, such as we find between all so- called real beings, to whichever of the tw r o supreme classes (material or spiritual) such beings may belong. The molecules of the brain (so far, at least, as psj'cho-physical science knows anything of them) are composed of elements of material reality, called "atoms ; " these atoms act by way of motion, according to their constitution and re- lations to each other and to their environment. The mind, on the other hand, is a real unit-being of another order than that of the atoms. Its acts are the various modes or states of consciousness. This being called mind is causally related to the beings called atoms ; the relation is mutual. The mind behaves as it does be- have because of the constitution and behavior of the molecules of the brain. The molecules of the brain behave as they do behave because of the nature and activities of the mind. Each acts in view of the other. The action of each accounts for the action of the other. But the action of neither is to be explained as solely due to the action of the other; neither mind nor brain can be regarded as the subject for the phenomena ordinarily ascribed to the other. The position just taken is, of course, the most unmistakable Dualism. It assumes two kinds of real beings for the two incom- parable classes of phenomena. Whether this position is the ulti- THE VIEW OF DUALISM. 657 mate one attainable by human reason or not, the facts of Physiolog- ical Psychology afford no basis for speculation. It is possible that some higher point of view might enable us to resolve the Dualism, and to discover a common ground for the body and soul of man, and even for all physical and spiritual phenomena. But psycho-physical science, simply observing the facts and building upon them, and upon such assumptions as it, in common with all the sciences, is compelled to make, establishes this Dualism of brain and mind, and then hands the case over to philosophy for further consideration. Moreover, there is nothing in any science, physical or psychological, which offers a single valid reason why both mind and brain should not be regarded as real beings, material and spiritual, mutually in- teracting. This last statement we shall now justify by considering, briefly, the objections to it, which have induced the resort to the before-mentioned other theories. 17. The law of the conservation and correlation of energy as far as it has been observed, or can reasonably be assumed to hold good offers no valid objection to the existence of a real causal connection between the mind and the brain. The present position of this law is that of an empirical generalization, found to hold ap- proximately true for a large number of classes of phenomena, and presumably true for yet other classes. To exalt it to the place of a universal and necessary relation among all phenomena of every class mental as well as physical would be unwarrantably to extend its application. Even in the sphere of physical events the law is as yet demonstrably true only to a limited extent. The various forms of physical energy in the inorganic world are as yet by no means all reducible to the terms of this law. Gravitation, on the one hand, and magnetism, or chemical affinity, or cohesion, or the forces that act when every crystal is formed, on the other hand, cannot be as yet related together so as to be expressed in these terms. No mathematical formula, or picture framed by the imagination, has thus far bridged over the gap between the molecular energy of inorganic and that of organic structures. In discussing the phe- nomena of general nerve-physiology, it was made obvious at every turn that even the behavior of the vital nerve-muscle machine under the influence of electrical or other excitation cannot be ac- counted for by aoy conceivable application of the known laws of those forces that move unorganized particles of matter. Nerve- force what it is and what it will do ; what it is as judged by what it will do cannot, at present, be correlated with any of the forms of energy which act as nervous stimuli. Yet who would for a moment hesitate to say that the action of the electrical current, or 42 658 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. of the irritating acid, or of mechanical impulse when applied to the nerve, is a "cause" of the contraction of the muscle? The effort of certain scientific observers to bring all causal rela- tion, all action of one being on another, under the law of the con- servation and correlation of physical energy is mistaken, and must prove unsuccessful. The discovery that all the action of physical beings is to be understood only in terms of motion, and that all re- lations of such beings are to be expressed as comparable quantities of motion, either obvious or potential, has, of course, greatly stim- ulated this effort. The effort is to a certain extent laudable. It has unified the physical universe ; it has showed to us this universe all alive, as it were, with unceasing, correlated, wondrous motions, which it is indeed conceivable should be all commensurable one with another. But it should never be forgotten that this picture of an objective world composed of beings called atoms, eternally moving with reference to each other and according to the law of the conservation and correlation of energy, is itself a picture con- structed by the imaging and reasoning mind. As such a mental picture, it is, and must always remain, dependent on the imagina- tion. Mind, as reasoning and imagining, follows the moving beings into minutiae of forms and into places where observation can never reach them. Hence the talk of atoms having "forces inherent " in them, of energy " potential " as well as kinetic, of the "influence" or "action" of molecule on molecule, and mass on mass, under this one great law discovered by modern physics. For the principle of causation is of far wider application, and of far more secure foundation, than the law of the conservation and correlation of energy. The one is a law which, in the form of the principle of reason and consequent, is worked into the very struct- ure of the rnind, and is of universal and necessary application to all phenomena ; the other is an empirical generalization, of doubtful import and uncertain extent of application. Indeed, we should not accept the physical law at all, or seek to establish its further appli- cation, were it not that the mental principle is already taken for granted. It is in our search for causes, and as a result of our per- suasion that real beings exist, which act on and are acted on by each other, that we hit upon the hypothesis of the sum-total of their ener- gies as shown by motion remaining unchanged, and of its different kinds being all measurable one against the other. But no objection exists, either in the nature of the mind or in the nature of things, so far as we know, to the reverse of this being true. For example, a world might be constructed in which a certain number of physical beings, of a certain kind (molecules and masses), remained abso- NATURE OF THE CAUSAL NEXUS. 659 lutely motionless and unchanged, while all other beings were in perpetual motion. Or a world might be constructed in which the activities of different physical beings, as expressed by motion, should be related in a totally different way from that formulated by the present law of the conservation and correlation of energy. In this imaginary world, some kinds of beings might put forth an amount of energy which was proportional to that of all the energy of the beings acting on them, as the square to the square-root, or as the cube to the cube-root ; and other kinds of beings might act and be acted upon under very different laws of relation with respect to the quantity of energy. In fine, the fact that the law of the conserva- tion and correlation of energy cannot hold true as to the connection between physical and psychical phenomena furnishes no sort of proof against the reality of the mind or of the causal connection between it and the brain. 18. Nor is there anything in the nature of the so-called " cau- sal nexus " itself which forms a reason why it should not be as- sumed to exist between brain and mind. For what do we mean when we speak of one thing or event as the cause of another? What do we mean when we speak of "influence exerted," "force transmitted" or "passing over" from one being to another, etc.? Nothing that can be explained or illustrated after the analogy of any series or collocation of phenomena, of any relation of one ob- ject to another as discernible by sense or picturable by imagination. Nothing passes from the match to the gunpowder which explains why the latter explodes ; or from the bat to the ball which explains why the latter, when struck by the former, changes the direction of its motion. The proximity of the earth and the unsupported con- dition of the apple, shaken by the wind from its stem, are indeed spoken of as the cause* of the apple's fall ; but no invisible hands are reached up from the ground to draw the apple down. Were such feelers put out to clasp the smaller body and draw it to the larger, the energy of the clasp and its effect would still as truly need an explanation as does the action of the so-called force of gravitation. None of the senses is capable of discovering or ap- preciating the energy that is assumed to act ; the causes of an event cannot be seen, handled, heard, smelled, or tasted. The world of experience given to us by the activity of the senses is a world in which a ceaseless change of objects takes place, but any evidence of a tie connecting the physical phenomena with real beings as their attributes, or connecting our minds with these physical real beings, so that they may be said to affect us, is quite beyond the range of the senses. 660 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. In general, it may be said that the world of appearances is found by an analysis of our adult experience to be assumed to rest, as it were, upon an invisible world of reality. The popular and uncriti- cal mode of the assumption is, that the world is made up of a great number of real " Things ; " that these things exist e^ra-mentally, just as they appear to us as objects of experience ; that our knowl- edge of them is a more or less true copy, obtained through the senses, of what they extra-mentally are ; and that these things are constantly doing somewhat to each other acting on each other and being acted on by each other. Scientific researches greatly modify the character of the popular assumption. They show that it is de- monstrably false in almost every particular ; and yet they re-estab- lish it in other forms. Physics, by a series of careful observations and subtle and remote inferences, constructs an extra-mental world of moving atoms ; it shows us how these atoms always have regard to each other when they move, and are ceaselessly moving with reference to each other ; it strives to image the direction and veloc- ity of the most infinitesimal of these motions, and to formulate their laws or constant modes of relation. Psychology shows how . the world of mental objects, the only world of immediate experi- ences, is built up by the synthetic activity of mind ; it calls upon the physicist to remember that he has no other way of reaching these atoms, and of discovering the laws of their relations, except by the path of mental activity ; and it reminds him that this activity cannot escape the control of mental law. But both the popular view and the scientific attainment are in substantial agreement as to their fundamental view of the world. Both believe that our ex- perience is explicable only on the general hypothesis of the exist- ence of a vast number of real beings which perpetually act on each other and are acted upon by each other. 19. The effort to restrict the working of the above-mentioned assumption, in which common-sense and scientific analysis both agree, just at the point where the relation of mind and brain is subjected to scientific treatment, is as needless as it is unavailing. Because it is bDth needless and unavailing it is often absurd. If it be granted that the law of the conservation and correlation of phys- ical energy cannot possibly be applicable to the connection of mind and brain, and yet that all which we know of the nature and extent of this law forms no valid objection to regarding both mind and material atoms as real beings standing in certain relations to each other What good reason can be urged for refusing to affirm a causal connection between the two? The fear that either of the two parties will suffer in dignity or integrity by such connection with the other CAUSAL INFLUENCE OF THE BRAIN. 661 may easily be laid to rest ; and if it could not be, it would have no right to interfere with the only reasonable interpretation of psycho- physical facts. Beings do not lose their reality, or characteristic nature, or value in the universe of Being, because they are causally connected with other beings. On the contrary, none but real be- ings can be thus connected with each other ; none but real beings can act and be acted upon. The so-called causal connection is no bondage of such nature as to destroy the nature of the beings which act under it. Only beings that have natures of their own can be causally connected. In other words, all that appears to us as a causal relation between the objects of our experience is, ultimately considered, due to no material spur or whip which urges, or band that represses, as though one kind of real being could thus domi- nate and subdue another. No atom acts without being acted on ; what it does depends both upon what it is and also upon how it stands related to other atoms. 20. We affirm, then, that we are entitled to say : The changes of the brain are a cause of the states of consciousness ; and the mind behaves as it does behave, because of the behavior of the molecules of the brain. Modify the constitution and functional activity of the material atoms, and you make the activities of the mind, its acts and states of consciousness, to be differently put forth by the mind. The nature and extent of this " influence " of the material basis upon the psychical subject can never be deter- mined a priori, or brought under any general formula applicable only to a restricted sphere of physical action, like the law of the conservation and correlation of physical energy. The nature and extent of such influence must be learned by investigation. It has been the special task of this treatise on Physiological Psychology to investigate and, as far as possible, to formulate the causal action of brain on mind. Such action has been seen to consist chiefly (if not wholly) in determining the intensity, quality, mode of com- bination, and of recurrence in time, of the sensational elements of the mind's activity, and of its other activities so far as dependent upon the sensational elements. The affirmation of a causal influence of the brain on the mind, however, does not really work any prejudice to the claims of the mind to be considered a real being, or to be spiritual and free. For the sole account or cause of the mind's activities can, in no instance, be found in the molecular condition and changes of the brain. The simplest sensation must be referred also to the nature of the mind as its cause. It must be considered, not simply as caused by a certain form of nerve-commotion in the cerebral cortex, but also 662 CONNECTION OP BRAIN AND MIND. as a psychical activity put forth by the being called mind. There is no incompatibility in these two ways of regarding each state of sensation. Even in the case of some physical event, the nature of each of the factors combining to form the event must be taken into the account. For example, atoms of oxygen will, under cer- tain circumstances, unite with atoms of hydrogen to form water ; under other circumstances they will unite with atoms of iron to form iron-rust ; they may also be mechanically mixed with nitro- gen-atoms to form air, etc. In each case the cause of the result is to be found in the presence with the oxygen, under certain definite circumstances, of atoms of hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, etc. But in each case the cause is also equally to be found in the nature of the atom of oxygen. So every sensation, however closely it may be correlated with the condition and functional activity of the molecules of the brain, must be explained by referring it to the nature of the mind which has the sensation. Nothing which Physi- ological Psychology has ever discovered, or can hope to discover, in the least mitigates the necessity of saying, when the question is asked Why does the mind behave in this particular way under such circumstances ? It is the nature of the mind so to behave when its circumstances are such. In other words, our explanations of the causes of mental phenomena, as lying in the physical basis of such phenomena, does not at all satisfy the need of a real and spiritual subject of the phenomena. Moreover, we have seen that there are large and most important classes of mental activities which can scarcely be conceived of as standing in any direct relation to the nerve-commotions of the cerebral cortex. These classes are indeed always allied with phe- nomena of sensation and feeling for which we can trace a bodily basis. But this fact only makes their connection with the brain presumably more indirect. For the explanation of such classes of mental phenomena we are driven much more imperatively and ex- clusively to an appeal to the existence of a spiritual subject, with a nature and laws of action very different from those ascribed to its physical basis, the brain. 21. We affirm, also, that we are equally entitled to say : The states of consciousness are a cause of the molecular condition and changes of the nervous mass of the brain, and through it of the other tissues and organs of the body. And just as no fear for the reality, integrity, and dignity of the mind prevents us from accept- ing its dependence for the mode of its activity upon the condition of the brain, so no fear for the reality of physical substance, and for the value and extension of physical law, prevents us from as- CAUSAL INFLUENCE OF MIND. 663 serting the dependence of the brain, for the mode of its activity, upon the states of the mind. Of course it need scarcely be said again no relation exists between these two kinds of beings which can be represented as an interchange of physical energy, under the law of the conservation and correlation of such energy. This fact, however, affords no objection to our recognizing a true causal connection between the two, unless we are ready to insist upon the monstrous claim that modern physical science is entitled to affirm the impossibility of any interaction (or conditional action) taking place in the universe otherwise than between material atoms under the aforesaid law. The phenomena which indicate that mind operates as true cause within the structure of the body are innumerable. They are quite as numerous, though perhaps not so obvious and impressive, as those which indicate the reverse relation. The chief reason why these phenomena are relatively little regarded in psycho-physical researches is, that the real causes are in this case not readily made the objects of observation and measurement. External stimuli con- stitute the causes of mental changes which we can most easily ob- serve and estimate. Ideas, feeling, and acts of will arising in the consciousness, and considered as causes of the resulting bodily changes, cannot be treated by the same methods of experimental science as apply to the physical stimuli. But that the mind acts on the body is one of the most familiar of experiences. Such ac- tion penetrates and modifies all the life of the body. Hence the material mechanism of the animal structure can never be consid- ered, with a view to explain what is going on within it, as though it were disconnected from the consciousness of the animal. The most purely vegetative of the processes of the human body are de- pendent for their character upon the states of the human mind. The nutrition of the tissues, the circulation of the blood, the secre- tion of different kinds of fluids, the healthy or diseased nature of the vital processes, are dependent upon the states of the mind. If abnormal digestion produces melancholy, it is equally true that melancholy causes bad digestion. In the case of the rise of strong- emotions, like anger or grief, the increasing affection of the mind builds itself up upon a physical basis of increasing disturbance of the organs ; but it is equally obvious that the starting of the emo- tion in consciousness, and the letting of it slip from control, are necessarily followed by gathering momentum to the organic dis- turbance. Irregular action of the heart, caused by organic defect or weakness, occasions a feeling of indescribable alarm in the soul ; fear is followed, through the action of the mind upon the nervous 664 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. centres, by functional incapacity of the heart. The impure condi- tion of the arterial blood which is characteristic of certain diseases brings about a chronic state of mental lassitude or anxiety ; care, chagrin, and ennui poison the arterial blood. The lesion of the cortical substance produced by a growing abscess or broken blood- vessel impairs the mind's powers of sensation and thought ; ex- cessive thought and over-excited feeling wear away the brain. The entire class of phenomena which we are entitled to call " voluntary," in the widest sense of the word, might be appealed to in proof of the same principle. Whether they show that the mind is " free," in the highest ethical meaning of the word, or not (and upon this question psycho-physical science cannot pronounce), they certainly do show that the condition of the bodily organs is made dependent, through the nervous elements of the brain, upon the states of the mind. And here are, in point, the phenomena of the voluntary innervation of the organ by fixing the attention, of the dependence of reaction-time upon the exercise of the will through attention of the person reacting, of the abstraction of regard from the images of sense when occupied in reflective thought, as well as all the more marvellous instances of self-control in determining the results of disease, etc. The elevation of the bodily activities to the most astonishing precision, under the influence of high and strong artistic feeling, or sense of duty, is also a noteworthy fact of the same order. The mind has not the power to constitute, in opposition to fixed chem- ical affinities, a single molecule, or to execute the slightest move- ment of a single muscle, without involving the nervous system in the expenditure of the requisite energy. Moreover, this energy must be started in the appropriate cortical area and descend along the allotted motor tracts. We cannot explain how it is that mole- cules of nervous matter can be acted upon in view of states of consciousness. But neither can we explain how one kind of atoms comes to act as it does in view of the presence and action of atoms of another kind. Nevertheless, we can just as little assume to ex- plain away the fact of such obvious causal connection, because we cannot bring the measure of the connection under the same law as that which maintains itself among certain modes of physical mo- tion. 22. No valid objection, therefore, can be urged against con- ceiving of the connection between mind and brain in the following way, at once most natural and most philosophical : The brain is a vast collection of material molecules, whose constitution and ar- rangement are such as to connect them, in a unique way, with cer- CAUSAL INFLUENCE OF MIND. 665 tain forms of physical energy outside of the body. Whenever these appropriate forms of energy act upon the parts of the nervous sys- tem lying below, and the impulses are transmitted to the brain, or whenever the chemical character of its blood-supply is altered, then the molecules of the brain are capable of undergoing very re- markable and intricate changes of constitution and arrangement. That is, the brain can be stimulated to certain of its peculiar com- binations of nerve-commotion by external stimuli. Moreover, it is constantly initiating other combinations of nerve-commotion that are apparently not due to such stimuli. Some of its actions, that is, are of a kind constantly arising within the system itself ; they are called automatic. We have as yet no adequate means whatever for making a quantitative statement of the relations which exist between the energy of atoms thus constituted and arranged and the energy of the masses or molecules that serve as stimuli of the system composed of these atoms. Nervous energy is not an entity to be dealt with by a sum in addition and subtraction of momenta. For aught we know, it is of the nature of atoms, when they are brought into relations so extraordinary as those which prevail in the nervous system, to behave with reference to each other in a way that is wholly irreducible to any simple formula like that of the conservation and correlation of energy. If this should final- ly appear to be indubitably true, the fact would not be specially mysterious. All action and reaction of the atoms is mysterious ; the methods of it are to be learned from experience as ultimate and inexplicable facts. Still further, the molecules of the brain are so constituted and arranged as to be capable of standing in yet more surprising and unique relations to a being of a different nature from their own that is, to the mind. These relations involve a causal connection as truly as any relations of real physical beings in which such beings, as we are compelled to believe, act on each other and are acted on by each other. That molecules thus constituted and arranged are causally connected with the subject of consciousness is an ultimate fact ; it involves the nature of both classes of beings thus connected of the brain and of the mind ; it involves also the action of each upon the other. In speaking, however, of mind and brain as act- ing on each other, we accomplish nothing whatever for the comple- tion of the picture by trying to introduce the conception of ener- gy "transmitted" or "passed over" from one to the other. The simple, ultimate fact remains, that how each behaves depends upon the behavior of the other. It is the business of psycho-physical science to discover, if possible, the general modes of this depend- 666 CONNECTION OF BRAIN AND MIND. ence that is, the laws of the relation between the mind and the brain. 23. In more particular description of the connection between the mind and the brain, it may be said that all intercourse between material objects and the spiritual subject involves three processes a physical, a physiological, and a psychical. In these processes the perceived object and the perceiving subject mutually conation each other. This fact, however, does not destroy the necessity, under which all scientific investigation finds itself, of assuming that both object and subject exist as real beings. The physical pro- cess consists in the action of the appropriate modes of physical energy upon the nervous end- apparatus of sense. The bringing of such modes of energy to bear upon the apparatus is accomplished through mechanical contrivances such as the means for forming an image on the retina in the eye, and for conveying the modified acoustic impulses to the organ of Corti in the ear. The second process consists in transmuting the physical ener- gies, in part at least, into a physiological process, a nerve-com- motion within the nervous system ; and in propagating such nerve- commotion along the proper tracts and diffusing it over the various areas of this system. Inasmuch as the physiological process is also a physical process that is, a mode of the motion of mate- rial molecules, accompanied by chemical and electrical and other changes it must be conceived of as standing in certain relations of quality and quantity to the first, or more distinctively physical, process. But that the law of the conservation and correlation of energy, as formulated for much simpler cases of the relations of forces between inorganic bodies, applies to the relations of the nervous system and its stimuli, or within the different parts of the nervous system itself, we are not yet able to affirm with confi- dence. The third process is psychical ; it is a process which is a psychi- cal event, a forth-putting of the energy of mind. It is directly correlated with the physiological process only when the latter has been realized in certain cerebral areas. It is not to be explained as a resultant of the cerebral physiological process, but as an ac- tion of the mind which is conditioned upon that process. So, also, are we entitled to say that, when certain psychical processes, by way of feeling, ideation, and volition, take place, then, and as con- ditioned upon these processes, certain corresponding physiological processes occur in the brain ; the physiological processes, being propagated from the central nervous system, end in physical pro- cesses returning energy to the world outside of the body. MIND A REAL BEING. 667 When the mental process is a perception of some object, called an " external " object, it is no less truly & psychical process. The mind creates its own objects ; presents itself with its own presen- tations of sense ; acts to bring forth that which it knows as not itself. But it does all this as dependent upon the processes which take place outside of itself, and with the assumption of extra-men- tal realities as existing, to which it stands in the relation of cause and effect. 24. Finally, then, the assumption that the mind is a real being, which can be acted upon by the brain, and which can act on the body through the brain, is the only one compatible with all the facts of ex- perience. There is nothing which we know about the nature of material beings and the laws of their relation to each other, or about the nature of spiritual beings and their possible relation to material beings, or about the nature of causal efficiency whether in the form of so-called physical energy or in that of activity in consciousness, which forbids the aforesaid assumption. On the contrary, everything which we actually know, as distinguished from what we conjecture to be true, or would like to have true, for the satisfaction of certain of our quasi-scientific or ethical impulses favors this assumption. And no other assumption, substantially different from this, is compatible with the facts of experience. CHAPTER IV. THE MIND AS REAL BEING. 1. No attempt need be made to conceal the fact that the last three chapters have given to the phenomena and laws of Physi- ological Psychology a " metaphysical " treatment. In the intro- duction (see 5) to the scientific discussion of the subject, the in- tention finally to raise and answer certain metaphysical questions as to the nature of Mind was frankly avowed. Indeed, since all dis- cussion of those assumptions which underlie our experience of what we call "reality" is metaphysical, it is not easy to see how the science of mind from whatever point of view approached can be thorough and conclusive without involving metaphysics. In this, the concluding chapter, certain still more distinctively metaphysi- cal inquiries must be briefly pursued. The mind has been spoken of as "real," "spiritual" (or non-material), a "unit-being," etc. These are terms which require further explication. What is meant by speaking of the mind as a real being ? What is it to be, in reality, spiritual rather than material? What is the real nature of that unity which belongs to mind ; and on what grounds do we affirm that the mind is a " unit-being f " Thus far the effort has constantly been made to maintain a close connection between the answer given to semi-metaphysical inquiries and the facts of physiological psychology. In rendering such an- swer the appeal has constantly been taken to the facts. Should the facts, in any case of appeal, not bear out or, at least, should they contradict the conclusions alleged to be based upon them, then the conclusions must be modified, or change the basis on which they assume to rest, or utterly fall. But in answering the more distinctively metaphysical questions now raised as to the nat- ure of mind, the psycho-physical facts are of little direct assist- ance. Such questions are fitly raised at the conclusion of psycho- physical researches only because these researches have led us to a certain view as to the nature of the subject of the researches namely, as to the nature of the mind. 2. The mind is a "real" being in the highest sense in which THE POPULAR IMPRESSION. any finite being can be real. Indeed, its claim to be considered real is more indisputable than the same claim as put forth for any material thing ; it is unique. The reality of mind underlies and makes possible all our knowledge of other real beings, and all our assumptions as to the existence of such beings. It is only on con- dition of granting its reality, in the highest sense of the word, that we can affirm the reality of other beings. There can be no doubt that the popular impression attributes a reality to material things which it does not consider to be pos- sessed by the mind. This impression makes the clearly visible and hard, tangible substances, experience of which constitutes so important a part of ordinary working-day life, the test and stand- ard of the most indubitable reality. Substantial as a rock (that is, a presentation of sense which consists of certain qualities made known especially to the tactual and muscular senses) ; and unsub- stantial as a day-dream (that is, a series of representative images largely free from all admixture of presentations of sense) thus does the popular estimate express itself with respect to the reality of the phenomena referable to things as compared with the pure states of mind. Materialistic objections to the reality of mind, when made to rest upon scientific data, repeat and confirm the popular impression. These objections ordinarily assume that no doubt can be raised as to the reality of material " Things." Such things as are real in the highest sense of the word, however, are not now understood in the same way as the things indicated in the popular impression. Only the atoms, or elemental and permanent factors which enter into the composition of all the objects of sense, are held from the scientific point of view to be real in the highest sense of the word. The things of experience by the senses are admitted to be con- stantly changing, and at no time, extra-mentally, to resemble the unchanging material realities with which science deals. Things, as they appear to the eye and to touch, are spread-out, continuous, without empty space between them, and for the most part motion- less, except as they are moved in masses by application of external energy. Things as they really are, however, are neither spread- out, nor continuous, nor motionless. On the contrary, they consist of a countless number of invisible and intangible real beings, called atoms, that are ceaselessly moving, with incredible velocity and in- tricateness of changing directions, in empty space, and according to forces inherent in them. These atoms are real, and have always been the sole element of all which appears as real ; so this form of quasi-scientific metaphysics goes on to declare. 670 THE REALITY OF MIND. On the other hand, it is argued by certain advocates of the fore- going view that the so-called mind is wanting in every characteristic which could justly entitle it to be called a reality. Certainly it is not adapted to win the popular respect as a hard and solid sub- stance, which it is difficult to move, and impossible to remove from the sphere of possible sensations. What is the mind, in reality f It cannot be seen or touched, or apprehended by any of the senses. It cannot be imaged as spread out in space, or as space-filling, by virtue of some physical energy streaming uninterruptedly forth from the mathematical point at which it is situated. It can do nothing except through the body ; that is to say, all that is done, which could possibly be referred to the mind, is really done by the body. And the body is a material mechanism, which is nothing except as it is constructed out of the same atoms, with their inherent forces, which have composed the star, the crystal, the flower ; and which can do nothing except as the ceaseless play of the energies of great Nature (of which it is a point, a part) are kept playing through it. Without the physical mechanism, as a real existence, there is no manifestation of so-called mind, no manifestation actual, possible, or conceivable. And when this mechanism is dissolved, the mental phenomena, so far as appears, wholly cease. What, then, is Mind ? What claim to reality can it possibly make valid ? More particularly, certain puzzling questions regarding the nature of the mind's behavior may be raised by the advocates of the same foregoing view. Where is the real mind, it may be asked, when consciousness is gone, as in swooning or deep sleep ? What becomes of the mental Being when the mental faculties one by one drop away, as in cases of general paralysis ? What worthy kind of real- ity can belong to the subject of phenomena so evanescent and tem- porary, so incapable of being measured, and weighed, and related to the permanent forces and beings of the material world ? More- over, if mind is a real being, what shall be said in answer to the inquiry, why certain of the lower animals can apparently divide up their souls by fission of their physical structure ? And cannot even man's proud unity of real being become disturbed by the accident or disease which results in a double consciousness, or in the loss of all previously acquired knowledge of the mind as previously existing and developed? 3. That many puzzling, and even unanswerable, questions can be asked concerning the nature of the mind, we have no interest to deny. Doubtless, if difficulties growing out of our inability wholly to clear up our ideas of " real being," " self-identical and perma- nent existence," etc., are objections to believing that any real beings THE POPULAR IMPRESSION. 671 exist, they are also objections to our believing in the reality of mind. But certainly it is one thing to ask unanswerable questions regard- ing the ultimate nature of any particular real beings, so called, and another thing to prove that our belief in the existence of such real beings is unfounded. Moreover, the fact that we cannot conceive of or define the real being of the soul, in terms which apply to material things, is cheerfully conceded. Indeed, it is this general fact upon which chief reliance is placed to prove that the being of the soul is unlike that of "Things" is non-material, or spiritual. But how can this fact prejudice the claim of the soul to be real, un- less it has previously been established that to be hard, and round, etc., or to be a minute material bit (an atom) ceaselessly in move- ment, is necessary in order really to be at all? The truth is, how- ever, that both the popular impression and the more scientific theory, just so far as they can cogently be urged against the reality of spiritual being, themselves rest on the most unverifiable and ab- surd assumptions. The popular conviction of the indubitable, and, as it were, supe- rior reality of certain classes of things is easily explained as the necessary result of the development of experience. All things which are pre-eminently real, in this meaning of the word, are cog- nizable by means of tactual and muscular sensations marked by a strong color-tone of feeling. Things merely smellable have no "reality," in this sense of the word, because they are not apprecia- ble by touch and offer no muscular resistance. We cannot put our hands on the effluvia which excite the olfactory nerve ; the air when laden with sweet and sickening odors is not tangible or impenetra- ble. Real things that is, things which can be seen and handled are, however, regarded as the sources of our sensations of smell. What is true of sensations of smell is also true, in less degree, of sensations of sound. But in the case of sound we are generally able at once to refer the origin of the acoustic sensation to some so-called real " Thing." Objects tasted are popularly regarded as real, because they are objects which are handled before tasted, and constantly touched as they are being tasted in the mouth. A "bad taste in the mouth " is not regarded as giving evidence of the pres- ence of any real thing ; it may simply be regarded as a sensation located in that region. Accordingly, one does not consider one's self to be tasting one's own mouth as a real thing, although one may say that the mouth has a bad taste. . Even when the presentation of sense is a clearly visible object, it does not necessarily seem to have the characteristics of a real thing. For the object of vision readily and quickly changes its 672 THE REALITY OF MIND. color, apparent magnitude, characteristics of superficies, and visible outlines as a solid. Moreover, everybody knows that his eyes have often deceived him ; even when they have been closed visual im- ages have appeared before the mind, such as could not possibly represent any so-called reality. But the nature of tactual and mus- cular sensations is different from the visual in several important particulars. Such sensations, on bestowing the requisite attention, may ordinarily be brought strongly into consciousness. They do not so readily change their quality regarded as coming to us from an apprehension of the properties of things. The feeling of effort colors them highly ; and the pain from being struck, pressed, pinched, or impeded, is a frequent accompaniment. Therefore, children are educated in their knowledge of, and belief in, a world of reality by being constantly resisted by material things ; and adults naturally suppose that when they can lay hands on an object they know that it really is, and what it really is, with a certainty impos- sible in any other way. It wholly escapes the ordinary observation that the same assump- tions whether they be deemed verifiable or unverifiable underlie the conviction of the reality of things tangible which belong to the operation of all the senses. It is true, as experience shows, that tactual and muscular sensations are, from their very nature, and from the manner and frequency of their recurrence, pecul- iarly adapted to serve the mind well in those acts of synthesis by which it constructs the real things of its experience. But this fact does not in the least diminish the force of the other fact namely, a certain assumption or postulate as to an extra-mental reality (an X, which is not any one of the attributes a, b, c, etc. of the " Thing," but which is the subject or ground of them all) underlies and conditions all the apprehensions of sense. Without granting and using this assumption we cannot affirm that even by tactual and muscular sensations we know any reality whatever, beyond the real fact that so our own minds stand affected with the presentation of an object of sense. If the popular impression con- cerning the reality of "things " does not extend beyond this simple act of self-knowledge, as it were, it certainly forms no ground for affirming the superior and undoubted nature of such reality. 4. The cause of the scientific objector to the reality of mind, as standing on an equality, with respect to the cogency of its evidence, with those material atoms about whose reality he tolerates no doubt, is not a whit better off than is that of the popular impression. In- deed, it is by no means so good. That ready-made " things " really exist in independence of mind (meaning by such " things" the ob- THE SCIENTIFIC OBJECTION. 673 jects of everyone's immediate experience) is a proposition which it involves fewer doubtful elements to maintain than the proposition that so-called " atoms " have such existence. It is time to raise the question : How can one know, so confidently, that those cerebral molecules exist e.*tfnz-mentally, with all their incalculable and almost inconceivable motions, on whose real being the phenomena of mind are sometimes made to depend? The brain it is claimed by Ma- terialism may be made responsible for mental phenomena, for the latter are mere manifestations in consciousness of the changes which are going on in the material constituents of which this organ is really composed ; there is no need of a real non-material being as the subject of the mental phenomena ; the physical phenomena, however, must have some real being as their subjects ; such reality is to be found in the molecules of the brain. But what are the grounds and the nature of our knowledge of this wonderful con- jurer styled the brain ? The so-called scientific argument against the reality of mind, as often applied, may be stated in terms somewhat like the foregoing. Little examination is needed, however, to show that its conclusive- ness involves certain assumptions which cannot themselves be vali- dated without weakening or destroying the very ground on which the argument is itself based. Let the case be tried by making a beginning with that sort of testimony with which everyone is most familiar. I know that I think, feel, will ; that is to say, phenomena take place in consciousness which there is no conceivable way of describing except by attributing them to the subject of all con- sciousness to the self-conscious " me " called mind. But because I cannot perceive this subject of all consciousness as an extended and external somewhat a "Thing "so large, and shaped and colored in just such a manner, with a definitely hard or soft feel that is to say, because I do not appear to myself in consciousness to be just such a kind of being as are some of the objects of my perception, I begin to raise the question whether this subject (the "I" that thinks, etc.) has any real being at all. May it not in fact be, I ask myself, that some " thing," or collection of things, like those which I have often seen and felt, is the subject to which the thoughts and feelings and acts of will that I have called " mine " should be attributed? Of course, if this question is to be answered in the light of modern physiology with even a provisional affirmative, the particular "thing," to which such activities as those I am conscious of are to be attributed, is my brain. Nothing, surely, but my brain can think, and feel, and will so to speak for me. For if physical science has established anything whatever with regard to a particu- 43 674 THE EEALITY OF MIND. lar organ or substratum of the mental phenomena, it is that such organ or substratum is the brain. But the inquiry must next be raised : How does one know that one has a brain, which may serve as the real substratum of the phenomena of one's consciousness ? It scarcely need be said that no one has ever had any evidence presented directly to the senses that such organ exists within his own cranial cavity. To be con- scious, and at the same time to observe the substratum of one's consciousness, is an unattainable opportunity. It may even be that the ego (the "I" of consciousness) which is engaged in the search for its own real being in a material substratum has never seen so much as a single human brain. It is certain that no ego has directly observed the molecular changes of any central nervous mass, whether belonging to another or to itself, when such mass was engaged in the activities whose resultant the phenomena of consciousness are claimed to be. Since there is such scarcity of direct ocular and tangible demonstration of a special relation be- tween the brain and mental phenomena, it is plain that the testi- mony of experts must be summoned. Resort must be had to the great anatomists and experimental physiologists who have had most experience as to the structure and functions of the brain-mass. It must, of course, be confessed that no expert has any more direct evidence than every self-conscious ego has of the existence of a real material structure called brain, which may account, by its presence and activities, for his own mental phenomena. Nor can he offer any evidence peculiar to himself for his belief that the par- ticular ego which each one calls " myself" is connected with a brain. How many soever other brains he may have seen, he only knows by a series of very indirect and complicated inferences that any individual whose brain he has not seen really possesses one. But whence these inferences ? and, What are the grounds on which the confidence attached to them is based? To these questions only one answer is, possible. The inferences themselves are acts of knowledge, modes of consciousness, phenomena of mind. The only possible grounds of confidence in them, as valid inferences, must be referred back to our inherent faith in the power of the mind rightly to infer, from its own phenomena, the real existence of beings the phenomena of which it has never perceived. More- over, if the mind had perceived the phenomena of its own brain, there could be nothing in the phenomena themselves to account for the power to make inferences which belong to it as mind. On the ground, then, of an inferred reality called the brain, I arn asked to dispense with my confidence in the reality of the being which THE ATOMS AS AGENTgfc^C/} /^ 675 makes the inference, and which, at the same time, makes a much more irresistible inference as to its own reality as an active infer- ring force. 5. The case is, however, by no means so favorable, as the state- ment just made would imply, for that phase of scientific material- ism which refers the phenomena of consciousness to the brain as their sole cause. For it is. not in the brain, as a mere mass of mat- ter whose structure and mechanical functions can be made obvious to any intelligent observer, that the real substratum of mental phe- nomena must be sought. Considered as such a mass, this organ is no better than any other similar soft and pulp-like bulk. It is the wonderful molecular constitution, atomic play, and changing dynamic relations of the invisible particles of this mass, which are responsible for its unique functions. In all the first Part of our investigation we saw how necessary physiology finds it to regard the nervous centres as molecular mechanisms. Nothing that is in itself of first importance appears to the eye of the observer who looks upon the freshly extracted mass of the human brain. And when this" mass has been skilfully prepared for investigation under the microscope, the investigation itself does not reveal directly, to the highest magnifying powers of the glass, the ultimate agents in the wonderful drama it has been playing. These agents are the atoms, to whose real being and so-called " inherent " forces all that is done by the complicated mechanism must be referred. But the existence of the atoms as real beings, capable of acting on each other and of being acted on how shall this remote and obscure fact be ascertained ? And how shall we learn what is the nature of these beings, so as to determine whether or not they are capable of performing the stupendous task of bringing forth the various mental phenomena ? In attempting to answer the last two questions we are in great danger of losing completely all that we have taken most pains to gain. It is to the all-powerful " atoms," with their potent forces, that we are now looking as the real subjects at once of the molec- ular changes in the brain-mass and of the phenomena of conscious- ness. From these real beings and their relations there must be derived, not only the activities which all ascribe to nervous matter, but also those which some are constrained to ascribe to conscious mind. And yet, how do we know that any real beings whatever called atoms exist ? Certainly not by direct evidence of any of the senses. Not even the most pronounced materialist would venture to affirm that he has seen or touched an atom, or can demonstrate its existence and nature to ordinary observation through the human 676 THE REALITY OF MIND. senses. Atoms are supersensible beings. Moreover, they are hypo- thetical existences, or beings whose existence is inferred in an ex- tremely roundabout way in order that we may be able to give to ourselves a rational account of the grounds on which certain classes of phenomena rest. The phenomena whose rational explanation seems most peremp- torily to demand some hypothesis of atoms are the phenomena of chemistry. When, however, the further inquiry is raised as to the real nature of the atoms, it is found that modern physical science is by no means satisfied with its own answer. Dynamical theories, tending to resolve the atoms into mathematical points acting as mere centres of force, contend with other more realistic theories which regard the atoms as simply the smallest bits of matter into which we can by any known means break up the larger collections. What is meant by the forces being " inherent " in the atoms is a still more difficult question to answer. Indeed, to this question no answer can be given which gets much beyond the simple declara- tion of the facts of experience ; that is to say, these hypothetical and yet sole real material beings are always supposed to behave, with respect to their motions, in the same way under the same re- lations, and something can be done by science toward measuring their various motions in terms one of the other. Moreover, the best efforts of modern investigation to describe the nature of the atoms appear, not only incomplete, but also, in certain particulars, self-contradictory. It is certain that the atom cannot be regarded as an independent reality. What it is can only be described by telling what it does ; but in telling what it does we always find ourselves implying certain relations to other atoms. That is to say, we know nothing about the nature of any of the atoms which does not involve also complicated hypotheses concern- ing its mode of behavior as caused by the presence and mode of behavior of other hypothetical beings. In this way the reality of the atoms is made ultimately to depend on the reality of some form of being that binds them together, as it were, and makes them work to a unity of plan. But here, again, we are reminded that we can form no conception of a " plan " which is not a phenomenon of mind, and no conception of a "unity " that does not depend upon the unifying actus of the mind. Moreover, all ideas of " relation " are dependent upon mental activities that are quite without phys- ical analogy. All " Things " are made into the units which they appear to be by the unifying action of the mind. Such action is implied in perceiving the things ; for the study of perception, from the physiological point of view even, has enabled us to show that ATOMS AS DUE TO MIND. 677 no so-called "thing" is a ready-made material product, appre- hended by mind in a form which is a copy of some extra-mental being. In trying, therefore, to comprehend what is the nature of those real beings (the atoms), on whose existence, activity, and rela- tions all mental phenomena are assumed by Materialism to depend, we find that the picture we frame of them is the work of the mind. 6. Accordingly, the whole course of argument and the whole weight of conviction appear to be the reverse of what is assumed by the objector to the reality of mind. The material molecules of the brain are not beings about the reality and exact nature of which we have the most indubitable evidence evidence so indubitable that we may venture to press it into the contradiction of the more immediate data of consciousness. If these elements of all physical being are real, they come to us as inferences and hypotheses ; they involve a vast amount of conjecture, indirect inference, and unsolved difficulties, or even contradictions. And if we ask, On what au- thority are these inferences made ? Whence comes the demand for any rational explanation whatever? Where do the conjecture, hy- pothesis, and sense of difficulty and seeming contradiction exist? then the only answer to be given to all these questions refers them to the Mind. What atoms and forces and laws can be, or mean, without the being and activity of self-conscious mind, is even harder to conjecture than what a color can be which is not seen, a sound which is not heard, an odor that is not smelled. And now let the attempt of materialistic theory be made anew ; let it be assumed that the phenomena of consciousness have no real subject in the mind. Such phenomena must, accordingly, be attributed to the peculiarly constituted and mutually interacting molecules of the brain. But these supreme physical beings are themselves, as far as they are the object of knowledge, pre-emi- nently mental creations ; and the sole warrant for carrying them over into the realm of extra-mental reality consists in certain irre- sistible convictions or assumptions of mind. To make their real being the account of the mental phenomena, and thus to deny the real being of the subject of mental phenomena, is not onty to ex- plain what is most direct and certain by what is most indirect and uncertain ; it even involves the wonderful paradox, that the one be- ing in whose active energizing all conceptions of all real being arise, feels justified in denying its own reality in the supposed favor of cer- tain of its most remote and doubtful conceptions. 7. 'What is meant by affirming the reality of mind may be made obvious by pursuing the following train of reflections : In the development of the mental life its phenomena come inevitably 678 THE REALITY OF MIND. to divide themselves into two great classes. As it appears to adulfc experience, not only the unfolding, but even the very existence of self-consciousness seems to involve the distinction between the ego and the non-ego between the "I " with its states, and the "Things" which it knows with their manifold properties or attributes. Each of these two classes of phenomena the so-called subjective and the so-called objective is inevitably attributed in consciousness to a different subject ; the one to the " I " as its own states, the other to somewhat left undefined, except that it is not the " I," and is called "matter," "material substance," etc. (the unknown X which is not I). It is only as involving all this mental process that any real being is known or believed to exist ; but the mind in the develop- ment of experience inevitably completes the process, which involves the assumption that real beings do exist, and that all these real beings are either " things," such as I know, or myself and other conscious beings, such as I am. What any real being is can only be told by an enumeration of its so-called attributes ; and this is as true of myself as of the things which I know. It is also as true of them as it is of myself. If the foregoing statements covered the entire case, it would simply be true that I have no better reason for attributing a real Being to any material thing than to the subject of consciousness. But we have already seen that the pro- cess by which we reach the real being of the molecules of the brain is much more indirect and doubtful than that by which we reach the affirmation of a real being for the things of daily experi- ence and for the subject of all that experience. 8. Peculiar and cogent reasons may be given, however, which further enforce and verify the assumption of a real existence for the Mind. We have seen (comp. Part II, chap. X., and the pre- ceding chaps, of Part III.) that there is a class of so-called mental faculties, most important and distinctive, for the distinguishing characteristic of which no physical analogies or correspondences whatever can be discovered or imagined. This is true of memory as active reminiscence, of the unity of consciousness, of voluntary attention, and of the relating activity. The existence of these modes of mental behavior requires the assumption of a charac- teristic real being, other than the molecules of the brain, to which they may be referred. Some of these modes of behavior are con- spicuously unintelligible and meaningless without granting such an assumption. For example, an act of recollection involves the presence in consciousness of a state the very essence of which is that it claims to represent (or stand for) an absent past state of consciousness. No way of verifying this claim which does not TO BE AND BE CONSCIOUS. 679 involve its acceptance can possibly be devised. But the present state of memory is a state of my consciousness, and the state which it claims to represent was also a state of my consciousness. To recollect the past state of another consciousness than my own in- volves an absurdity ; to recollect a past state otherwise than as represented in a present state of my own consciousness also involves an absurdity. Of course, such reflection upon the nature of the act of memory affords no demonstration of the claim that the sub- ject of the present state is one and the same real being with the subject of the past state. On the contrary, all demonstration itself rests on this assumption ; for without accepting it as valid we could not reach the conclusion of any demonstration. The premises of every syllogism are connected with one another and with their conclusion in a living unity of thought, only on the assumption that one real being is the subject of each of the thoughts which constitute the syllogism. To "be really" and to be the one permanent subject of changing states, are, in our conception, but different ways of expressing the same truth. That really is which is such a subject of its own states. It is for this reason that modern physical science regards the atoms as having a permanent reality which does not belong to the composite structures the things of our experience into which the atoms enter. Every " Thing " may perish that is to say, as such thing, it may cease to be the object of observation, the subject of states. But the atoms are supposed to remain with unchanged natures through all the changes of relation which they may undergo toward other beings with somewhat similar natures. Even if we were obliged to adopt the hypothesis of a constant change of states in the interior of the atoms, since every atom shows a variety of possible activities according to the relations in which it stands for the time to other atoms, it is not considered to have lost its real being or distinctive nature by changing its states. For it the atom can be brought into the same relations again, and then it will again display the same modes of behavior. Its reality does not depend upon its interior rigidity, the unchang- ing nature of its being ; it rather depends upon its capacity for being the subject of so-called states, and for following a law or an idea which recalls it, as it were, to the same states when the same circumstances recur. How can it be denied that all our conceptions of the atoms as enduring subjects of various states are derived from our experience with ourselves ? The " I " which is the subject of all consciousness is accustomed to attribute to itself every state of that great variety 680 THE REALITY OF MIND. into which consciousness may be shaped. The states are changing ; they have a transitory and phenomenal being. But they are all states attributable to one subject. On what ground, then, shall one undertake to deny the confidence which the soul comes to have in itself as the real and permanent subject of its own states ? For we can form no conception of real being at all which is not modelled after this pattern. To have a variety of changing states attributed to it as the subject of them all this is to demonstrate in conscious- ness a claim to real Being. Unchanging rigidity, the permanence of the mathematical point or of the material atom, on the supposi- tion that the latter undergoes no interior changes whatever, if such rigidity and permanence anywhere exist, constitutes no claim to the title of real being. The soul exists in reality, above all other kinds of being, because it alone, so far as we know on good evidence, knows itself as the subject of its own states ; or, indeed, knows the states of which it is the subject as states belonging to itself. But its law is that of development ; and, unlike all " things " which are subjects of va- rious kinds of evolution, so called, the soul can recognize the law of its own being. When, therefore, we are asked what the Mind really is, we can respond by telling what it comes to be as the re- sult of its unfolding under the fixed conditions of its native powers. But these " powers " cannot be called native, as though they were actual achievements of the mind's inborn faculties, or separate forms of energy inherent in it, after the analogy of the forces said (some- what unintelligibly, it must be admitted) to be " inherent " in the atom. But we do not define the nature of any real being simply by stating how it appears and behaves in its most germinal and unde- veloped form. The tree explains the seed ; the adult bird, the egg ; the character of the highly differentiated product must be studied in order to know the full description of the energies that are potential in the simpler stages. It is an undoubted fact that the mind has a history in each individual case ; and in each case such history is a development. The great service which Physiolog- ical Psychology has rendered to the general science of mind con- sists in its desciiption of the nature and stages of this development, so far as concerns the phenomena of sensation and perception by the senses. This self-recognizing unity of development which be- longs to the mind is a striking proof of the validity of its claim to be considered a real being. As the being which acts and knows itself as acting, which is acted upon and knows itself as affected, which is the subject of states and itself attributes these states to NON-MATERIALITY OF MIND. 681 itself, which develops according to a plan and so remembers and comprehends the significance of its past states that it can recognize the fact of its own development as such a being the Mind is more entitled to consider itself " real " than to consider real any of the various objects that, immediately or indirectly, appear before it in the course of its history. 9. The question whether the mind is to be spoken of as non- material or " spiritual " scarcely merits the grave and lengthy dis- cussion to which it has often been carried. Materiality, as predi- cated of any real being, is only a complex term including a num- ber of so-called attributes, which are all the subjects of experience only as belonging to individual things. All real things are to be called material which have these attributes, so called. Primarily, as has been frequently shown already, the attributes are simply modes of the affection of the mind which we have learned to localize and objectify as belonging to extra-mental reality. But if we raise the question whether the Mind, too, is known to itself as having those attributes which make up our complex, general notion of "materi- ality," no one would find it easy to think of giving this question an affirmative answer. The mind attributes to "things" the qualities of extension, impenetrability, and all the various subordinate mod- ifications of these qualities. It perceives these things as colored, cold, hot, rough, smooth, etc. But it does not attribute such quali- ties to itself ; it can find nothing in the modes in which it mani- fests itself to itself which would warrant the application of similar terms to these modes of its own behavior. Indeed, all the terms which do apply to the recognized qualities of mind have to be understood as figurative when, having been borrowed from physical relations, they are made to apply to psychi- cal states. Even in those cases where the analogy seems almost to amount to an identity, closer inspection shows that this seem- ing does not correspond to the actual fact. For example, we do attribute quantity to sensations and feeling. But when the suffer- ing from pressure becomes more intense, we do not regard the mind as actually passing, like some material thing, under a heav- ier load (sub-fero), against which it must either bear up or break, through the physical strain. Just so, movements of the mind are not to be defined as changes of its position with relation to other things in space. We are, then, surely warranted in affirming that, so far as the mind has any immediate information as to what quali- ties should be assigned to itself and what to " things " which it always looks upon as not-itself it is compelled to regard itself as non-material. 682 SPIRITUALITY OF MIND. We have no way, however, of telling what is the nature of any so-called real being except by enumerating its qualities, or those modes of behavior which we attribute to it on account of its affect- ing our consciousness in certain definite ways. To attempt to re- gard the mind as material, when it manifests itself to itself as non-material, compels us either to use the word "material" in an unwonted and unauthorized way, or else to attribute to matter in general certain occult powers which it never manifests itself to the mind as possessing, and which make it really to be quite different from what its manifestation of itself would indicate. The only way of maintaining the materiality of mind would then appear to be that of denying its real existence at all, and of attrib- uting its phenomena to the material molecules of the brain as their real and material substratum or basis. But the untenable nature of this view has already been sufficiently indicated. Or perhaps a strong temptation may be again felt, at this point, to recur to the hypothesis of a third somewhat, a " two-faced unity," which is the ground of the phenomena of both body and mind. But such hypoth- esis can throw no light whatever on the inquiry whether the mind is material or non-material. The phenomena we call "mental," and attribute to the subject of consciousness, would remain just as radically unlike those which we call " physical," and attribute to matter, after making the hypothesis as before. And to the hypoth- esis itself the same objections would remain opposed. The negative conclusion that mind is non-material is quite in- evitable for everyone who admits that mind is a real being with any nature whatever. 10. It is not difficult, also, to show that we must make the cor- responding positive statement, and affirm the spirituality of mind. This we can do with confidence, however, only so long as we mean by the term "spirituality " simply to sum up and express in one word the list of attributes which describes the known activities of mind. To perceive, feel, think, will in brief, to be conscious in some one of the various forms of conscious life this is to be positively spirit- ual, in the only sense in which we'are entitled to affirm spirituality of mind as such. As soon as we conceive of spirituality as some ethereal extension of thinking substance, we enter upon the vain effort to conceive of mind under terms of matter, and at the same time escape the consequences of so conceiving of it. Nor can we hope to vindicate for the mind such spirituality as would be implied in its being freed from all relations to material things, or from de- pendence for the modes of its being upon the material substratum of the brain. How spirit, in the sense of disembodied or unem- MENTAL ACTIVITIES SPIRITUAL. 683 bodied mind, would perceive, and feel, and think, and will, is a ques- tion toward the answer to which we can make no beginning. To attempt its answer at all involves us in the vain effort to use the very relations which are most inseparately connected with the con- scious activity of the mind in such way as to escape from the con- trol of the relations themselves. It is true, nevertheless, that a marked difference exists in the directness and intimacy which belong to different classes of mental states, as regards their comparability to the classes of physical stimuli which rouse the mind to its fundamental activities. Those which appear to be most indirectly, and, as it were, loosely related to these fundamental activities are fitly most relied upon to show the spiritual nature of mind. To control the mental train as dis- tinguished from being a passive member of a mental mechanism, to reason so as to deduce conclusions and make inductions to gen- eral laws, to recognize the call of duty, and to call up and classify in the consciousness the lofty and complex ideas which answer to words like " beauty," " truth," and " God " these and other simi- lar operations of the mind pre-eminently emphasize its spirituality. 11. In somewhat the same way must it be admitted that the question of the unity of mind has given rise to much fruitless and by no means altogether pertinent debate. The attempt to conceive of the mind as a unit-being, constituted after the analogy of those physical structures which we are accustomed to regard as unities, inevitably leads to confusion and error. The important psycho- logical fact is, that there is no one of these physical unities which does not derive its unity from the unifying act us of the mind. This statement is true of each such so-called unity, whether it is per- ceived as one or is conceived of as one. The unity which belongs to the percept finds its source in the synthetic activity of the per- ceiving mind ; the unity of the conception, in the unifying activity of the mind's relating faculty. It is sometimes supposed, however, that an atom which should have no parts, be perfectly homogeneous throughout, and so incapable of changes of its interior states, would be the highest possible type of a unity of real being. Nothing could ever happen to disturb or destroy such a unity. Wherever in all space it might be moved, or whatever in all time might hap- pen to it, it could ex hypothesi never be made two. If, now, such a unit-atom were to be endowed with consciousness and spiritual be- ing, how secure would its unity continue to be ! Unlike the mind of man, it could not fear that some rude concurrence of other atoms, not of the right affinities, or setting themselves in untoward relations, would dissolve its complex material substratum and so 684 THE UNITY OF MIND. destroy its spiritual oneness. The molecules of the human brain are in number beyond computation ; they are highly complex and unstable compounds ; they are not so protected by their inclosure in the cranial cavity as to make them invulnerable against all man- ner of assaults. In how dangerous a position, then, is this so highly valued unity of our present spiritual organization ! Now, it must be admitted that such a thinking atom would be in far less danger of suffering from the death of the physical basis of its thought than is the thinking man. But two considerations of great importance are likely to be overlooked in the mere making of the hypothesis of such an atom. Surely such an atom could hard- ly have any experience corresponding to what we call the unity of our consciousness ; and if it had any unity of consciousness what- ever, such unity could no more be explained as arising out of, or conditioned upon, the simplicity of the physical being of the atom than the unity of our consciousness can be explained as arising out of, or conditioned upon, the complexity of our physical being. It is impossible to see how a unity of consciousness at all resem- bling what we understand by the term could find an adequate ma- terial substratum in a single rigid atom. In other words, if a spirit- ual being having a unity of consciousness were brought into special psycho-physical relations with a material being incapable of any interior changes, because possessed of no parts to undergo change, these relations would have to be totally different from any which we can conceive of as holding between the body and mind of man. For the very nature of the mind's unity is dependent upon that variety of experiences which is occasioned in the mind through the changing states of the brain. The physical basis of the human mind is undoubtedly an extremely complex system of interacting molecules. Certain relations can be traced between the character of these physical interactions and the character of the states arising in the mind. These states depend for their character, and even for their very existence, upon the occurrence of the corresponding material changes. A brain that is not in a ceaseless change of ac- tivities of the peculiar sort called " neural " is a dead brain, so far as its influence on the mind is concerned ; such a brain could not serve as the substratum or physical cause of mental phenomena. Comparative anatomy shows us that the greater the number of molecules, and the larger the variety and the size of the organs specially related to the mental processes, the richer in variety and nobler in quality the mental processes themselves become. More- over, so far as we can ascertain, the highest unity of consciousness belongs in connection with the greatest complexity of the material THE UNITY OF THE ATOM. 685 substratum. The animals which have the largest cerebral develop- ment appear to have, too, not only the most manifold and extensive mental life, but also, in the highest degree, the capacity for attrib- uting the phenomena of that life to one subject. Those psychical activities which are connected with the physical interaction of the greatest number of material elements are the most numerous and significant ; and they are, also, actually most perfectly harmonized into a higher unity of spiritual self-conscious being. 12. No information derived from the study of Physiological Psychology warrants us in affirming that a highly developed self- conscious existence must, from the universal necessities of the case, be united with a vastly complex material structure like the human brain. Such study does, however, compel us to affirm that such a unity in variety as is the human mind cannot be conceived of in dependence upon the movements in space of a single perfectly rigid and unchanging atom. The development of human experi- ence is conditioned upon the arising in consciousness of many sensations of varied quantities, qualities, and orders in time ; upon the synthesis of these sensations into presentations of sense ; and upon the recall of the presentations in the form of representa- tive ideas. What experience would be, if its basis were not laid in such rise and combination and recurrence of sensations, we can- not even conjecture. In the highest flights of imagination, in the profoundest explorations of reflection, we never escape out of the influences arising from this basis. The nature of this psychical basis of sensation and perception depends upon the nature of the physical basis of the living and acting brain. In other words, what sensations and perceptions constitute, at least in part, the " stuff" of all consciousness depends upon what the molecules of the cen- tral nervous system are doing. We cannot even conceive of any other relations as possible between the mind, on the one hand, and the brain, on the other, than relations between a system of moving molecules and a corresponding change of conscious states. 13. Furthermore, the unity of a single indestructible and eter- nally unchanging atom would afford no explanation of a mental unity. In the case of man's mind and brain, the variety of the nervous changes in part explains the variety of the mental states ; but nothing in the changing relations of the innumerable moving molecules throws any clear light on the origin of the unity of mind in consciousness. A material being absolutely without distinction of parts would be, for that fact, no better fitted to become conscious of itself as one. A series of states of consciousness can indeed be attributed by our imagination to such a being. From the purely 686 THE UNITY OF MIND. psychological point of view we can conceive of the unit-atom as having an experience resembling our own. We, in our conscious- ness, can imagine such a being as the subject of states, and as attributing each of these states to one and the same subject namely, the "I" of the unit-atom after the fashion of our cus- tomary mental behavior. But this is quite a different thing from ex- plaining the consciousness of such an atom as arising, with respect to its unity, out of the material nature of the atom. By the very hypothesis, the material nature of this particular kind of atom can have no states ; it never changes ; it is always the same. But con- sciousness is always some particular definite state ; and self-con- sciousness is always the being aware of some particular definite state. There is no consciousness in general ; there is no conscious- ness which does not involve change of state. Indeed, change is a reality in human consciousness, if nowhere else in the universe of being. No particular state of consciousness, whether considered as involving an attribution of that state to a subject or not, could be explained by reference to the material nature or condition of such a unit-atom. 14 The foregoing remarks have their value chiefly as a warn- ing against supposing that the unity of the soul's real being suffers any prejudice because it is not to be regarded or explained from a point of view furnished by physical analogies. To be one, as a rigid material atom may possibly be regarded as one, would be no ad- vantage to the soul. Or if it be admitted that, in case it had such unity, it could never lose its real being, it must also be admitted that we are unable to see how it could ever gain any real being as a soul. If the unit-atom could never die, it could also never live as a con- scious psychical existence. And it is the unity which the mind plainly has in self-consciousness that is alone worth contending for. If the mind were really that is, regarded as out of its own con- sciousness one, and yet two or more in consciousness, it would be no better, but rather the worse off. If it were really one, but were obliged not to know itself as one, and could never be aware of its own states, or attribute them to the one "I" which is the subject of them all, it would surely be the worse off. To be one, in the only meaning of the word that is of real value, is to have and to keep the unity of consciousness. If this unity were realty a mere seeming a trick of nature to cheat the mind the seeming would forever seem real, would, indeed, be the ground of all reality ; the trick would be the kindest of all illusions, and one from which we should crave never to be set free. When, then, we have recognized the fact that all ordering and development of human consciousness SELF-APPEAKANCE OF MIND. 687 implies this kind of unit-being as belonging to the mind, we have gone as far in vindication of the mind's rights as we have any psy- chological interest in going. 15. That the mind attributes its own conscious states to a sub- ject of such states (the " I " in all sentences such as " I think," " I feel,"^tc.), we have seen it necessary to admit from the very be- ginning of our psycho-physical researches. As one result of the study of perception by the senses, it was also found necessary to recognize a certain unifying or synthetic activity in order to ac- count for the way in which sensations combine to form the " pres- entations of sense ; !' such unifying activity seems plainly to imply the existence of a unit-being, the so-called Mind. Further argu- ments in the same direction came to light as the phenomena of the mind in memory, voluntary attention, and judgment were brought under examination. More recently still, an examination of the factors of self- consciousness, from the more purely introspective point of view, has confirmed the same opinion. In this connection we may add, finally, the argument for the existence of the mind as a real unit-being, which has been so forcefully urged by one of the greatest of modern psychologists (Lotze). The mind is a real unit- being, not simply because it appears to itself to be such, but chiefly because it appears to itself at all. Granted that all that which only appears to another maybe mere seeming, it still remains indis- putable that somewhat appears. The somewhat which merely ap- pears may be really many when it appears as one ; this happens, in some sort, in the case of all " Things " which appear many or one according to the way we consider them. But how can that to which all else appears, whether as one or as many, and that which also appears to itself whether it appear to itself as one or as many really be other than one, in the highest sense of the word unity ? No twisting of imagination, or subtlety of argument, can show how a mind not really one could appear to itself at all ; or break the strength of the conviction inwrought into the very structure of human self-consciousness, that the real and spiritual being, which we call Mind, is not a fortunate confluence or phenomenal centre of changing modes, but a unit-being, and a reason of all unity in whatever becomes the object of its thought. 16. As to the first and last things of the Mind its origin and destiny, its mortality or corruptibility Physiological Psychology finds itself unable to pronounce. It cannot, indeed, explain the en- tire being of the mind as arising out of the development of the physical germ from which the bodily members unfold themselves. It knows no decisive reason against the belief that such a non- 688 THE UNITY OF MIND. material and real unit-being, as the mind is, should exist in other relations than those which it sustains at present to the structure of the brain. On the contrary, it discloses certain phenomena which at least suggest, and perhaps confirm, the possibility of such exist- ence for the Mind. But, in general, if it remain faithful to its own mission, within its own limits, it entrusts the full consideration of these questions, after it has cleared the way from barriers of igno- rance and prejudice, to Kational Psychology, to Ethics, to Meta- physics, and to Theology. INDEX. AGRAPHIA, nature of, 294 Allen, Grant, on nature of feeling, 501 f., 521 Aphasia, phenomena of, 292 f. ; kinds of, 294 f. Aqueduct of Sylvius, 88 ; gray matter of, 91 Aqueous Humor, the, 173 Arachnoid, the, structure of, 63 f. Attention, effect of, on reaction-time, 480 f., 495 f.; physical basis of, 538 f., 542 f.; effect of, on perception and memory, 539 f . Aubert, on measurement of light, 374 f. Automatic Action, nature of, 49 f., 130 f.; in spinal cord, 138 f . ; and brain, 144 f. ; physical basis of volition, 535 f . BAIN, on local signs, 397 (note) ; theory of feeling, 501 ; feeling of effort, 524 Baxt, on reaction-time, 481 Bechterew, on the olivary bodies, 150, 161 f . ; and central gray matter, 161 f. Bell, Sir Charles, discovery of, 123 f . Ben eke, on nature of feeling, 503 Berger, on reaction-time, 478 Bernstein, on exhaustion of nerves, 109. Betz, "giant-cells" of, 97, 283 Birge, E. A., on number of nervous ele- ments, 46, 70 ; excitability of cord, 143 Blastoderm, the, 200 f.; layers of, 202 f.; areas of, 202 f. Blind-spot (papilla optica), 183 Body, general relations of, to mental phenomena, 560 f.; early development of, 562 f., 567; phases of, 565 f.; sexual differences of, 570 ; relative proportions in, 571 f . ; race-characteristics of, 573 f . Brain, chemistry of, 25 f., 27 f.; mem- branes of, 61 f.; structure of, 73 f., 85 44 f . ; ventricles of, 85, 149 f . ; ganglia of, 85 f.; hemispheres of, 91 f.; lobes of, 92 f.; cortex of, 95 f.; inhibitory in- fluence of, 143 f.; as central organ, 143 f.; development of , 204 f.; general functions of, 239 f.; temperature of, 242; comparative weight of, 243 f.; weight of human, 244 f.; relation of, to mind, 24J ,"606 f., 633 f., 640 f. Broca, convolution of, 292 f . Briicke, on neutralization of taste, 403 ; perception of depth, 442 Byasson, on brain-waste, 242 CAMEREK, on measurement of taste, 376 f. Capsule, the internal, 90, 91 Carville and Duret, on stimulation of motor areas, 257 Cattell, on reaction-time, 485, 493 f . Cells, the olfactory, 164f.; the gustatory, 167f.; the auditory, 192 Central Canal, 66 f . Cerebellar tract, 71 f., 75, 77 Cerebellum, 74, structure of, 78 f.; pe- duncles of, 79 ; arbor vitce of, 79 ; func- tions of, 152 f.; lesions of, 153 f. Cerebrin, 24, 25 Cerebro-spinal system, axis of, 62, 204 f . ; development of, 204 f., 212 Cerebrum, 74. 82 ; shape of, 82 ; gyri of, 84, 91 f., 95 ; sulci of, 84, 91 f.; nervous elements in, 91, 95 f . ; layers in its cortex, 95 f.; fibres of, 97 f.; nervous paths in, 127 f., 269 f.; functions of, 150 f., 156 f., 239 f.; development of. 204 f.; local- ization in, 239 f., 250 f., 255 f., 269 f.; significance of, 249 f . ; effects of injury to, 258 f., 269 f. Charcot, scheme of decussation, 290 690 INDEX. Charcot and Pitres, on localization of cerebral function, 282 Chaussier, on growth of foetus, 566 Chemistry, of nervous system, 21 1, 217 1 ; of cells and fibres, 28 ; of physio- logical function, 28 f., Ill f., 222; of vision, 184 f. Chodin, measuring power of the eye, 451 Cholesterin, 23 f. Choroid, the, 171 f. Clarke, columns of, 70 Cochlea, the, 191 Color, stimulus of, 328 f., 338 f.; saturated, 328 ; tones of, 329 ; brightness of, 330, 376 ; shades of, 331 f . ; complementary, 333 f., 343; dependence of, on time, 334 f.; and place of the retina, 335, 338; blindness to, 335 f.; contrast of, 337, 460 ; Young-Helmholtz theory of, 338 f.; symbolism of, 342 f.; sensitive- ness to, 375 f. Consciousness, the circuit of, 494 f.; physical basis of, 544 f . ; possibility of a prenatal, 565 1; psycho-physical ex- planations of, 596 ; phenomena of, 597 f.; unity of, 607 f., 631 f. Cornea, structure of, 171, 173, 175 f.; index of refraction of, 176 ; function of, 176 f. Corona Radiata, 91 Corpus albicans, 83, 87 Corpus callosum, 82, 85; function of, 98 Corpus dentatum, of the medulla, 78 ; of the cerebellum, 79 Corpus geniculatum, 87, 89 Corpus quadrigeminum, position of, 87- structure of, 90 f. ; functions of, 156 1; development of, 208 f. Corpus striatum, 86 ; nuclei of, 86 f . ; paths in, 129; functions of, 1581, 160 f.; development of, 208 f. Corpus subthalamicon, 89 Cortex of Cerebrum, structure of, 95 f. Crura Cerebri, 83, 87; crusta and teg- mentum of, 87 f.; fibres in, 87 f.; func- tions of, 156 Crusta, see Crura Cerebri Crystalline Lens, the structure of, 173 DEITERS, processes of, 43, 70 ; conical hair-cells of, 195, 197 Dietze, on the circuit of consciousness, 4941 Dobrowolsky, on measurement of color- sensations, 375 f . Bonders, on localization of depth, 465 ; time of mental processes, 468 f., 479 f. Dove, the experiment of, 442 Drbal, on nature of feeling, 503 ; kinds of feeling, 505. Du Bois-Reymond, discoveries of, 104, 112, 115, 117 ; theory of nervous ac- tion, 227 f . Dura Mater, structure of, 61 f . ; processes of, 63. EAR, 1851; the external, 185 ; the middle, 186 1 ; bones of, 187 f. ; tympanum of, 188 ; vibrations in, 188 ; the internal, 189 1; vestibule of, 189; canals of, 189 f . ; cochlea of, 191 ; nerve of, 191 1 ; terminal apparatus of, 192 1, 324; problem of, 195; development of , 211 1; sensitiveness of, 317, 319 Ecker, view of cerebral cortex, 263 ; charts of, 276 1 Eckhard, law of central mechanisms, 161 Electricity, " current of rest " in nerves, 104, 106 1, 117, 227 f. ; as stimulus of nerves, 111, 112, 1141, 2281 ; "nega- tive variation " in nerves, 118, 227 f. Electrotonus, Pfl tiger's law of, 113, 115 1; theory of, 222 f., 226 1 Embryo, knowledge of, 198 1, 212 f. ; of the fowl, 199 1 ; development of, 200 1, 204 f., 212 1, 618 Encephalon, see Brain End-organs of Motion, place in nervous system, 60, 164 ; structure of, 197 End-organs of Sense, place in nervous system, 60, 164 ; significance of, 1631; end-organs of smell, 164 1 ; of taste, 106 1 ; of touch, 168 f. ; of sight, 171 1 ; of hearing, 185 1 Engelmann, on continuity of axis-cylin- ders, 40 f . Estel, on reaction-time, 490 Eustachian Tube, 186 1, 189 Exner, on speed of reflex action^ 135; regio olfactoria, 165; nature of nerve- commotion, 224 1 ; general function of the brain, 240 ; cerebral physiology, 254, 267 ; views of, on localization, 267, 279 f., 284 1, 289 f. ; methods of, 276 1 ; on aphasia, 294; reaction -time, 4701, 480, 496 f. ; attention, 538 Eye, structure of, 171 1; tunics of, 171 1 ; INDEX. 691 refracting media of, 173 f., 175 1 ; ap- pendages of, 173 f., 177; muscles of, 174 f., 428 f. ; problem of, 174 f. ; ad- justment of, 177 f., 433 ; pigments of, 184 ; development of, 210 f .; motion of, 428 f., 439 f. ; meridians of, 431 f. ; torsions of, 432 f. ; innervation of, 439 f . ; stereoscopy of, 440 f. FASCICULUS GRACILIS, 68, 72 Fechner, conception of psycho-physics, 12; on measurement of sensation, 361 f., 369 f. ; law of, 365 f., 374 f., 594 Feeling, mixture of, in local signs, 398 f. ; of innervation or effort, 415 f., 523 1; of " double contact," 417 f. ; nature of, 499 f ., 504 ; classes of, 505 f. ; intensity of, 508 1 ; tone of, 509 f. ; physical ap- paratus of, 510 f. ; common, 512; of sensation, 514 f. ; the emotions, 5161, 519 f.; sthenic and asthenic, 518 f. ; the higher aesthetic and intellectual, 520 f., 523 Ferrier, on corpora quadrigemina, 157 ; and striate bodies, 159 ; experiments of, 254, 264 ; centres of, 268 f ., 285 f., 291 ; on feeling of effort, 524 Fick, on muscle-contractions, 119 ; mi- nute color-sensations, 334 f.; curve of intensity, 475 Filum terminale, 64 Fissures, of Sylvius, 92, 94, 210, 267 f.; of Rolando, 92, 94, 267 Flechsig, on tracts in spinal cord, 71 f. Flourens, on respiratory centre, 147 f . ; op- tic lobes, 156 ; localization of cerebral functions, 253 Foramen magnum, 64 Formatio reticularis, in the medulla, 77 f.; in the tegmentum, 88 Foster, on the respiratory centre, 148 Fovea centralis, 183 Franck and Pitres, on stimulation of brain, 257 Friedrich, on reaction-time, 483 f. Fritsch, experiments of, 253 f., 264 Frohlich, classification of sensations oi smell, 310 Funke, on Weber's "sensation-circles, 407 GALL, on cerebellum, 156; phrenological theory of, 252 Gamgee, on chemistry of brain, 25 f. janglia, the "basal," 88 f. anglion-cell, see nerve-cells George, theory of temperament, 575 f. Gerlach. on intimate structure of the cord, 70 ; and cerebral cortex, 96 urliky, on nerve-tracts, 261 Goldscheider, on "pressure spots," 346 f., 369, 410; temperature-spots, 348 f., 370, 413 Groll, column of (see fasciculus gracilis) oltz, experiments of, on spinal cord, 140; on optic lobes, 157 ; view of localiza- tion, 264 f., 273 f.; experiments of, 297 f. Grutzner, on nature of nerve-commotion, 225 f. Gyri (or convolutions) of the cerebrum, 84, 92, 93 f.; development of, 210 HALL, G. STANLEY, on perception of mo- tion, 411 f., 416 ; studies of rhythm, 490 Hamilton, on the circuit of consciousness, 494 ; tone of feeling, 509 Hearing, end-organ of, 185 f.; sensations - of, 195, 315 f.; perceptions of, 403 f. Helmholtz, on speed of nervous processes, 120 f.; index of refraction of cornea, 176; accommodation of eye, 177 f., 433; size of blind-spot, 183 f.; analysis of sound, 196; nature of noises, 316; consonances of tone, 323 f.; theory of color-sensations, 338 f . ; and of percep- tion, 389 f., 452 ; on Listing's law, 431 ; movements of the head, 454 ; localiza- tion of depth, 465 Hensen, on function of labyrinth, 194 f . , 196; nature of noises, 316 Bering, theory of color-sensations, 340 f . ; of temperature-sensations, 350 f.; in- nervation of the eye, 439 f., 451, 525; movements of the head, 454 Hermann, on electrical phenomena, in nerves, 118 f., 120; theory of nervous action, 226 f. Herscbel, on brightness of stars, 373 f. Herzen, on sensations of temperature, 3521 Hill, A., view of "basal ganglia," 89 Hirsch, on reaction-time, 470 Hitzig, experiments of, 253 1, 264; on localization of cerebral function, 253 1, 267 ; centres of, 267 f . 692 INDEX. Horopter, calculation of, 437 Horwicz, theory of feeling INHIBITION, nature of, 51, 144; from brain on cord, 143 f. Iris, the, 172 Island of Reil, 92 ; layers in, 97 ; function of, 295 f . JAMES, PROFESSOR, theory of the emo- tions, 519 f.; on the feeling of effort, 5241 Jastrow, on comparative judgments of eye and hand, 466 ; studies of rhythm, 490 KANT, on sthenio and asthenic feeling, 518 f. Keppler, on measurement of taste, 377 Klug, on localization by temperature, 414 Kolliker, on end-organs of touch, 170 Kollert, on reaction-time, 489 f . Kraepelin, on measurement of visual sen- sations, 375 Krause, end-bulbs of, 169 f.; on index of refraction, 176 Kuhne, on chemistry of retina, 28, 184 f.; function of nerve-fibres, 54; structure of end-plates, 197 Kunkel, on inertia of the retina, 474 Kussmaul, on aphasia, 293 LAMANSKY, on measurement of color- sensations, 375 Lecithin, 26 f. Le Conte, on Listing's law, 431, 439; torsions of the eye, 431 ; nature of the horopter, 437 f . ; theory of double images, 442 Listing, the law of, 430 f., 439 Lobes, of the cerebrum, 92 f . Local Signs, theory of, 387 1, 396 , 398 f., 409 Lob, on visual areas, 288 f. Lohmeyer, on cases of aphasia, 296 Lombard, on temperature of brain, 242 Longet, on columns of the cord, 125 f. ; localization of cerebral function, 252 f . Lotze, theory of local signs, 387, 396 f., 451 ; on distinctions by the skin, 409 ; perception of magnitude by the eye, 451 ; errors of sense, 455 ; theory of feeling, 499 f., 510; image of memory, 547 f.; differences of the sexes, 573 ; kinds of temperament, 577 f. Luchsinger, on reflexes of the cord, 138, 141 Luciani, on localization of cerebral func- tion, 269 f., 285, 288, 301 Luys, on basal ganglia, 129 ; attention and will, 544 ; memory, 552. MACH, on fusion of nervous shocks, 473 Magendie, discovery of, 123 f. Materialism, views of, 607 f. Matteucci, on electrotonus, 228 Mechanism, nervous system as, 4 f., 19 f., 198, 214 f.; the nerve as, 104; develop- ment of, 198 ; theory of the nervous, 2141, 2221, 2261 Medulla Oblongata, structure of, 74 1; tracts of white matter in, 76 1; gray matter in, 77 f.; nuclei of, 78; reflex- motor functions of, 146 1; as auto- matic, 147 1; centres of, 147 f., 150; vaso-motor function of, 148 Meissner, calculation of the horopter, 4371 Membranes, of the brain, 63 f.; the bas- ilar, of Reissner, 191 ; Kolliker, 194 Memory, reproduction of images of, 491 \ 1, 5461; physiological study of, 5351; / physical basis of, 545 1, 550 1; as re- tentive, 548 f.; the organic, 550 1; as reproductive, 552 1 ; psychological nat- ure of, 554 f . Merkel, on reaction-time, 483 f., 486, 4951 Mesencephalon, development of, 207 1 Meynert, description of brain, 73, 98 f., 246; on layers of cerebral cortex, 95; relation of brain to intelligence, 248 ; nerve-tracts in cerebrum, 283 Mind, subject of phenomena, 3 1, 585 1, 596 1 ; relation to nervous mechanism, 235 f., 560 1, 579 f.; and to the brain, 247 1, 588 1, 592 1, 005 f., 633 1; syn- thetic act of, in perception, 388 f., 416 1, 462 1, 467, 594 1; faculties of, 5S7 f., 600 1; physical explanations of, 593 1, 602 1, 625 1; as a unit-being, 5% 1, 668 1, 683 f.; phenomena of. 597 f.; as a real being, 606 1, 611, 633 1, 656, 668 1; development of, 614 1, 62:5 1; seat of, 634 1 ; physical organs of, 640 1; as a cause, 648 1; spirituality of, 681 f . Moldenhauer, on reaction-time of taste, 479 INDEX. 693 Moos, on duration of the image of mem- ory, 549 Motions, the Bodily, classes of, 526 f.; the impulsive, 537; the voluntary, 527 f., 530 ; the expressive, 531 Miiller, G. B., on measurement of sensa- tions, 368 Miiller, J., on brain as measure of intelli- gence, 248 Munk, experiments of, 270 f . ; on localiza- tion of cerebral function, 272 ; motor areas of, 272 f.; visual areas of, 286 f.; auditory area of, 291 NAHLOWSKY, on nature of feeling, 502 ; kinds of feeling, 505 f. Nerve-cells, chemistry of, 28 ; elements of nervous system, 30 f . ; kinds of, 31 f . ; intimate structure of, 42 f. ; shapes of, 44 f . ; processes of, 44, 70 ; size of, 45 ; as a typical element, 45 f . ; number of, 46; functions of, 49 f., 134, 2341; of the embryo, 200 f., 212 Nerve-commotion, causes of, 48 ; condi- tions of, 106 f., 122 ; phenomena of, 111 f., 230; nature of, 116 f., 122, 222; laws of, 118 f., 122, 230; speed of, 120 f., 122 f. ; paths of, 122 f., 1271, 261, 283 ; summation of, 223 f., 233 1 ; facilitation of, 224 1 Nerve-fibres, chemistry of, 28; ele- ments of nervous system, 30 f. ; kinds of, 34 f. ; size of, 34, 41 1 ; structure of the medullated, 35 1 ; fibrillated axis- cylinder of, 38 f . ; origin of, 45 1 ; number of, 46 ; in the cord, 681, 123 1, 134 ; of the embryo, 212 Nerve-muscle machine, 104 1 ; behavior under electricity, 111 f . ; as a mechan- ism, 215 1 Nerves, structure of, 33 f . ; general func- tion of, 47 1, 54, 59 1, 106 f. ; excita- bility of, 47, 106 1, 353 f.; conductivity of, 47, 60, 102-122, 1181, 120; kinds of, 51 1, 60, 353 f.; afferent, 52 1, 120 ; efferent, 521, 120; the cranial, 1001; the encephalic, 100 1 ; exhaustion of, 1081; mechanical properties of, 109; thermic influences upon, 110 1; chemi- cal influences on, 111 ; processes in, 1171; specific energy of, 300 1, 307 1, 3531 Nervous Matter, kinds of, 22 f . ; specific gravity of, 22 f . Nervous System, a mechanism, 4 1, 191, 1981, 214 f., 222 f., 226 1 ; general func- tion of, 18 f., 57, 219 1; elements of, 21 f.,30 1, 216 1; chemistry of, 21 1,2171; cells and fibres in, 30 f . ; structure of, 56-101 ; plan of, 57 1, 219 1 ; sets of organs in, 59 1; the sympathetic, 60 f.; the cerebro-spinal, 601; development of the,- 198 f.; inertia of, 472 f. Neuclein, 24 1 Neuroglia, nature of, 31 f. Neurokeratin, 24 Nothnagel, on striate bodies, 159; fine- ness of temperature-sense, 369 1 Nuclei of nerve-cells, 43 ; of the medulla, 78 ; of the corpus striatum, 86, 88, 90, 159 ; of the tegmentum (red nucleus), 88, 89 Nystagmus, 153 1 OLIVES, the, 75, 78 ; functions of, 150 Optic Thalami, position of, 86 1 ; struct- ure of, 89 1; connections of, 90, 1271; cells and fibres of, 90 ; paths in, 129 ; functions of, 158 f . ; development of, 2081 Organ of Corti, 193 1 Organs, kinds in nervous system, 59 1 ; the central, 60, 73 1 ; functions of, 130 f ., 224 f . Ott, on centre of temperature, 161 PACINI, corpuscles of, 169 Paneth, on excitation of cerebral cortex, 2691 Papillae, circumvallatae, 166 1; fungi- formes, 166 f. Peduncles, of the cerebellum, 79 ; of the cerebrum, 82, 871,971 Perception, nature of, 382 f., 462 1, 467, 538 1; nativistic and empiristic the- ories of, 389 1; by smell, 402 1; taste, 403; hearing, 403 f.; touch, 405 1; of motion, 411 1, 452 1; by temperature, 413 1; of sight, 421 1, 440 1, 448 1; of depth, 441 1, 459, 464; of spatial relations, 448 1, 464 1; development of, 462 1; physical basis of, 538 1 Pfluger, table from, 113; law of, 113 1, 115 ; on reflexes of the cord, 137 f . Physiological Psychology, definition of, 1 1, 4 1; combines two sciences, 6 f.; divisions of, 8 1; method of, 9 f., 12, 532 ; claims of, 13 ; successes of, 304 f ., 694 INDEX. 532 f., 593 f.; theory of perception of, 3821; limits of, 532 f. Physiology, relation to psychology, 1 f. ; of nerves in general, 103 f. Pia Mater, structure of, 64 Pons Varolii, 74 ; structure of, 81 f. Presentations of Sense, elements of, 304 f., 383 f., 468 f.; process of construc- tion of, 382 f., 387 f., 416 f., 448 f.; space-form belonging to, 385 f., 391 f., 448 f.; synthesis of, 386 f., 416 f., 467; analysis of, 388 f., 595; nativistic the- ory of, 389 1 ; empiristic theory of, 389 1; stages of, 400 f.; by smell, 402 f.; taste, 403; hearing, 403 f.; by touch, 405 f.; by sight, 421 f., 433 f., 443 f.; time-relations of, 468 f.; assumptions entering into, 594 Pressure, sensations of, 345 f., 367 f.; spots of, 346 Preyer, on sensitiveness to pitch, 319 f.; fusion of nervous shocks, 472; sensa- tions of new-born child, 569 Protagon, 25 f. Psychology, conception of, 2 f.; method of, 9 f., 587 f., 605 f.; classifications of, 5871, 6051 Psychometry, method of, 469 f.; elements Retina, the, 172 f.; problem solved by, 174 1, 178 1, 183 1; layers of, 179 1, 183 f.; nervous elements of, 180 1, 326 1; rods and cones in, 181 f., 327 ; own light of, 326 ; relation of, to sight, 335, 423 1; field of, 423 1; identical and corresponding points of, 434 f . Ribot, on physiological study of con- cepts, 532 ; and of memory, 552 1 Ritter, on sensations of smell, 309 Rolando, f uniculus of, 77 ; tubercle of, 77 ; fissure of, 92, 267, 282 Romieu, on stimulus of smell, 311 Rosenthal, on speed of reflex action, 135 1; electrical taste, 313 SCHAFHAUTL, on limits of sound, 372 1 Schiff, on posterior columns of cord, 125 1; on excitability of cord, 141 1; on cerebellum, 153, 155 f.; temperature of brain, 242 ; localization of cerebral function, 273 1, 283 1 Schultze, Hans, on structure of axis- cylinder, 39 1 Schultze, Max, on varieties of nerve- fibres, 34 1; and structure of nerve- cell, 42 f.; on olfactory cells, 164 f.; auditory cells, 192 Schwann, sheath of, 36 ; substance of, 36 of time in, 470 f . ; results of, 497 Psycho-physics, Fechner's conception of, j Sclerotic, the, 171 12, 380 1; method of, 359, 361 1, 365 I Seguin, on cases of aphasia, 295 1; the laws of, 359 1; 365 1; 379 1; of sensations of touch, 367 1 ; of sound, 370 ; of light, 373 1; of smell and taste, 3761 Purkinje, cells of, 80 Pyramidal tract, 71 f., 77, 97 QOETELET, proportions of human body, 566 f., 574 RANVIER, nodes of, 36 1, 40 1; on struct- ure of ganglion-cell, 43 Reaction -time, nature of, 475 f.; influ- ences upon, 476 1, 495 1; methods of determining, 479 f.; complex processes of, 491 Reflex action, 50 f., 130 f.; kinds of, 131 ; in spinal cord, 131 1, 136 f.; conditions of, 134 f ., 136 f. ; speed of, 135 1 ; in the brain, 143 f., 224 1 Regio olfactoria, 164 1, 308 f. Reissner, membrane of, 191 Remak, fibres of, 34, 41 Semicircular canals, the, 189 1 Sensations, end-organs of , 1641; analysis of auditory, 195, 324 ; quality of, 303 f., 325 1; simple, 305 1; conditions of, 307 f.; of smell, 3081, 376 1; of taste, 311 1, 376 1; of sound, 3151, 3701; of sight, 3251, 3731; theory of the vis- ual, 338 1 ; of temperature, 344, 309 1 ; of pressure, 344, 345 f., 367 1; the mus- cular, 3441; quantity of, 3561; meas- urement of , 359 1, 364 1, 3691; least observable difference in, 361 f., 364 1; range of, 363 1; spatial series of, 386 f., 393 f.; localisation of, 387 1, 405 f. Senses, organs of the, 164 f.; classifica- tion of the, 303 f . ; the geometrical, 386 1 ; errors of the, 455 f . Setschenow, on inhibitory centres, 144. Sight, end-organs of, 171 1, 1741, 338 1; photo-chemistry of, 178 1, 184 1, 326 ; sensations of, 325 f.; stimulus of, 325 1; after-images of, 336 f. ; elements in per- ception of, 420 f., 447 1; motion of eye INDEX. 695 in, 428, 431 f . ; single and double images in, 434 f . , 438 f. ; stereoscopic and per- spective. 440 f . ; secondary helps of, 443 f., 4551 Smell, organs of, 164 f., 308 f.; nerve of, 165,310; stimulus of, 165 f., 308 f., 310; sensations of, 308 f.; kinds of, 310 ; measurement of, 378 f . ; percep- tions of, 402 f . Soul, see Mind Sound, analysis of, 195 f., 324; sensa- tions of, 315 f., 370 f.; kinds of, 316; nature of the musical, 316 f. ; limits of, 317, 371 1; " entotic,"403 f.; direction of, 404 Spinal cord, membranes of, 61 f . ; struct- ure of, 64 f ., 143, 207 ; fissures of, 64 f.; columns of, 66, 67, 125 f. ; commissures of, 66 ; horns of, 67 ; white substance of, 68; nerve-fibres in, 68 f., 123 1; gray substance of, 69 f . ; nervous tracts in, 71 f., 123 f.; as mechanism, 72, 122, 133 f., 144; nerves from, 100 f.; nervous processes in, 122, 1341; roots of, 1231, 207; as a central organ, 1321, 138 1; automatism, 138 f. ; "centres" of, 140 1; excitability as a whole, 141 1; " ses- thesodic" and " kinesodic," 142; in- fluence of brain on, 143 1; develop- ment of, 207 Stimulus, kinds of, 48; heat as, 110 1; electricity as, 111 1, 312 1; of smell, 165 1, 308 1, 376 1; of taste, 311 f., 3761; of hearing, 315, 370 f.; of sight, 3251, 3281, 373 1; measurement of, 359 1, 3671; limits of, 362 1, 367 1 Strabismus, 153 f. Strieker, on common feeling, 513 Stumpf, on judgment of tone, 320 Substantia gelatinosa, 69 Substantia nigra, 87 Sulci, of the cerebrum, 84, 91, 92 1; de- velopment of, 210 Sully, on tone of feeling, 511 Suspensory ligament, 173; function of, 1771 Sympathetic System, structure of, 60 1 TALBOT, the principle of, 473 Taste, end- organs of, 1661,313; nerve of, 168, 314; sensations of, 311 f., 376 1 ; stimulus of, 3121 ; kinds of, 314; measurement of, 376 1 ; percep- tions of, 403 1 Tegmentum, see Crura Cerebri Temperament, theory of, 575 1, 579; kinds of, 575 1 ; physical basis of, 579 Temperature, sensations of, 344, 3481, 369 1 ; after-images of, 351 1 ; measure- ment of, 369 1 ; sense of locality by, 4131 Thalamen-cephalon, 208 Things, distinguished from sensations, 359 f . , 382, 594 ; results of mental syn- thesis, 594 1, 609 ; unity of, 609 1 Thudichum, on chemistry of brain, 27 Tischer, on Weber's law, 372 Tones, the musical, 316; pitch of, 317 1; table of, 318; sensitiveness to, 319, 3701; purity of, 319 1 ; judgments of, 320 ; relations of, 322 1 Touch, kinds of, 168, 345 1 ; end-organs of, 168 f. ; sensations of, 345 1, 3671; perceptions of, 405 1 ; the field of, 406 1,4161 Trautscholdt, reaction-time of complex processes, 491 f.; on effect of practice, 496 Tiirck, method of, 71 ; on columns of cord, 126 Tympanum, the, 186 1 ; membranes of, 186, 188 1 ; windows of, 186 ; muscles of, 187 ; office of, 187 1 Tyndall, on stimulus of smell, 311 f. VALENTIN, on nervous excitation, 223 1 ; sensations of smell, 308 f. ; of taste, 314, 3771,403; on sense of locality, 406 1 ; fusion of nervous shocks, 472 Valli, principle of, 107 Vestibule, of the ear, 189 Vierordt, on measurement of sensation, 371 f . ; localization by touch, 409 1 ; subjective estimate of time, 488 1 Vitreous Humor, the, 173 Volkmann, A. W., on measurement of sound, 371 ; of light, 374 ; of length of lines, 376 ; on sense of locality, 407 Volkmann von Volkmar, on motifs of monocular vision, 430; nature of feel- ing, 503 Volta, on electrical taste, 312 1 Von Gudden, on optic chiasm, 290 Von Kries, on the number of colors, 332 ; on theories of color-sensations, 341 1; sense of locality, 397 Von Kries and Auerbach, on sense of 696 INDEX. locality, 397 ; reaction-time, 476, 481 f., 487, 496 Von Vintschgau, on conduction in nerves, 121 ; reaction-time for multiplying, 493 Von Wittich, on fusion of nervous shocks, 473 ; reaction-time of taste, 478 Vulpian, on nervous function, 54 ; on ex- citability of cord, 142 ; centres of the medulla, 149 ; and cerebellum, 154 f. WAGNER (H. and R.), corpuscles of, 170 ; on measurement of brain-mass, 247 ; effect of fear, 518 Waller, method of, 107 f . Weber, E. H., on temperature-sensations, 110, 347, 351 ; smell, 308 ; law of, 365 f., 368 f., 374 f., 378 1; on direction of sound. 404 ; perceptions of touch, 405 f.; "sensation-circles" of,' 406 f.; measuring power of the eye, 452 Wertheim, on ductility of nerves, 109 Will, effect of, on bodily motions, 528 f.; physiological study of, 535 f.; physical basis of, 536 f.; in attention, 539 f. Wundt, on columns of the cord, 126 ; on cerebellum, 152 ; optic thalami, 158 f. ; and striate bodies, 160; mechanical theory of, 231 f.; kinds of taste, 314; theory of color-sensations, 341 ; on com- plementary colors, 343 ; theory of apper- ception, 380, 539 f.; on Weber's law, 381 ; on theories of perception, 389 f.; "sensation-circles," 408 ; visual percep- tion, 422, 425 f., 451; judgment of distance, 433; feelings of innervation, 439, 451, 524 ; psycho-physical time, 471, 477, 483 f., 488, 496 ; curve of feel- ing, 514 ; theory of temperament, 576 f. ZONULE of Zinn, 173 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED This book is due ontne last da on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. UNIV. OF CALIF General Library University of California Berkeley LD 21-50m-6,'60 (B1321slO)476