h UC-NRLF B E flM3 IDD THE DUKE OF YORK. PLAIN STATEMENT OP THE CONDUCT OF THE MINlSTRr AMD THE OPPOSITION, TOWARDS HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF YORK. Quern accusant omnes, defendit nemo. Hi acriter instant, — lUi non nimis Nolunt LONDON: vPRINTED BY B. M'=M1LLAN. BOW STREET, COVENT GARDBK^ i?aiNTER TO HIS ROTAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCE OF WALES » SOLO BY T. EGERTON, WHITEHALL } H. D. SYMONDS^ PATERNOSTER ROW3 AND TO BB HAD OF ALL BOOKSELLERS. 1808. Wm STACK (SC '^< PLAIN STATEMENT, 4'c. 4-6. TT is an observation as ancient as civil society itself, and the distinctive insti- tutions to which that society has given birth, that no characters are so obnoxious to unjust reproach as those of the great ; and that the pedestal upon which public characters are raised into more conspicuous view, renders them, at the same time, more assailable objects of envy and malig- nity. They must be clumsy marksmen in- deed, who cannot hit an object at once so large and so conspicuous. There is a te- merity, moreover, so like courage, in the very attempt, that the people are some- times deceived into an admiration of the Libeller, and pass over his malice, whilst they regard his audacity with astonishment. We seldom analyze our stronger sensations. Heroism and audacity — the courage in a B 246 good cause, and boldness in a bad one — • are not unfrequently confounded together, and, for a moment at least, even a Libeller may be considered as a public benefactor. Who is there, in the present day, hears the name of Wilkes, without the most extreme contempt, not only of that wretched Indi- vidual himself, but of the equally wretched populace who could be made the tool of his undignified faction ? Yet it is still within the memory of many of us, when the name of this base Libeller was in the mouth of all, and Wilkes and Liberty became syno- nimes. It was doubtless the same with Cade : This fellow had his day, and was the idol of the hour. The P — , the W— , the Cobbets, and their more dignified em- ployers behind the curtain, the last dregs of retiring Jacobinism, the last and most malignant lees of that poisonous- cup, which the wrath of Heaven has poured out upon offending nations — this faction will likewise have its hour, and posterity will likewise ultimately execute its justice upon them It is indeed chiefly to the unhappy spi- Tit of the times, that His Royal Highness the Duke of York must impute that tor- rent of calumny which ^is brought to bear against him. We hve in times in which the passions of men have been unhappily moved, and what is perhaps more lament- able, in which the objects of this excited malignity are those in command. The malignity is against Government, and re- straint of whatever kind. Government, however, has a strong hand, and can op- pose the arguments of a Libeller by that most effective weapon, the ultima ratio of Kings and States. It is not so with an individual. If Government, or what is the same thing, the existing Administration, for reasons best known to themselves, choose to detach an individual from their body, and to put him as it were out of the covering protection of their society ; and what is more, if their actions are such as must be construed into an encouragement of a public persecution againt the object of their jealousy — is it a subject of surprize, I say, if such an individual, pushed out of the pale of Government protection, should B 2 . 1 become an object of attack to a popula|f demagogue ? In every society, since the first constitution of a community, there have been, and there must be, a plentiful por- tion of that spirit, which, impatient under a civil inferiority that it fancies to be un- just, avenges itself by an hatred of alllhose w^hose station is more dignified. When any such dignified individual is turned oi|t amongst such a class of natural levellers,' is it any reasonable subject of surprize, that the whole pack should be upon him — that he should be worried upon this side and upon that ; that he should be made the scape-goat upon whom the faction should exhaust all the revenge and malig- nity conceived against the fraternity ? There is one thing, how^ever, which may excite a very reasonable astonishment. It is confessed by all, that the spirit of the times is not in favour of even that mea- sured obedience, that moderated respect fto Government, which, even under a free Constitution, is necessary to the very exist- ^ ence of a community. Would it not seem, therefore, to be a natural result of this state of things, that all the immediate Members of a Government, all the more distinguished individuals of an Administra- tion, should feel a common interest, a principle of prudence and sympathy, in protecting each other ? — Should not the attack of one be considered as the attacic of all ? — When so many are combining against all of them, should there be no de« fensive union amongst themselves ? An individual unacquainted with public affairs would either refuse credit to such a statement, as conveying in itself an absur- dity which is its own refutation, or would be astonished that the rules of public con- duct are so precisely the reverse of the maxims of private prudence. He would suspect, and perhaps justly too, that the state of things was bad indeed, when the most effective Officer in the State, — he who should at least be the most effective Officer — is represented as one who is not to be trusted with the execution of what falls most immediately within his official duties; and when the Ministers of the Country neither repel this accusation, nor act upon it. He will be inclined to de- mand, — Whence is this temerity, and this cowardice, — this audacious accusation, and this reluctant execution of a sentence ta- citly confessed to be just? Do Ministers assent to the justice of the charge, or do they consider it to be founded in malice r If the accusation be just, why is it not acted upon ? What kind of Ministers are these, which will sacrifice the public service to fear or favour ? On the other hand, if the Ministers know it. to be unjust, why are they silent ? Is there no Attorney Ge- neral, or no Treasury Papers ? Is every possible fund of defence exhausted t Has Mr. Canning no wit, and my Lord Cas- tlereagh no words ? There is still another point of view, in which the relative situation of His Royal Highness is equally matter of surprize. — It is the characteristic distinction of a free Government to be divided into parties, and the common liberty is supported by the contest between them. As these parties are necessarily opposed to each other, so have they necessarily each their distinct ends and objects. The errors and faults of one, whether acts of commission or of neglect, are usually seized by the oth^r with suffi- cient eagerness, as objects of their party attack, and whatever peculiar li.ie of policy is pursued by the one, is usually adopted as the peculiar line of opix)sition by the other. In this contest of contraries, there are few individuals, and few opinions, but what must necessarily have their chance of a party and of its support. Whence then has it happened, that His Royal High- ness the Duke of York has never had even the usual advantage in these party con- flicts r — That he is neglected by one party, and that he is passed over by another ; and that even an opposition, delicate in nothing, have never either adopted, or rejected him ? Whence this neutrality on both sides ? In what manner has Coriolanus so offended both the Consuls and Senate, that he is cast out naked to meet his fate amongst the factious Tribunes ? These points are extra- ordinary, and require explanation. A few words, however, will be sufficient. It will verify what will be considered as an extra- • ordinary rule in a free Government, but what must hereafter be adopted as an cTxiom — 7^/iaf no one is secure of protection^ unless he has ^associated himself to some party, aifd that it is a breach of ministerial, or rather of party -privilege, and as such offensive to all parties, to stand neuter, and keep aloof from such comtexions. It is the object, therefore, of the follow- ing observations, in son re degree to open the eyes of the people upon this subject, — to detail the origin and sources of that illiberal clamour, which, to the astonish- ment of all unprejudiced men, and to the indignation of all justly-informed men, has been excited and directed against the Duke of York. It will hence be made manifest, that it is not the public service, but private malignity, or at least private jealousy, and individual contests for honor and place, which have indisposed a very powerful party against His Royal Highness, and withholding from him the natural and necessary protection due to his rank and station, have left him naked to the assaults of his low-minded Libellers. Had His Royal Highness belonged to any party — had he become even a princely cypher, he would not have wanted allies in his time of need. As it is, they expect to teach him a lesson which may influence his future conduct. It is not the purpose of this Statement either to flatter His Royal Highness, or to bring any retaliating charge against his avowed or secret assailants. Nothing, therefore, shall be said but what is simply necessary to the point in view. If there l^e any thing more contemptible than anony- mous slander, and the protection of Libel- lers, it is the foedum crimen servitutis. His Royal Highness is doubtless not without his failings, but it is not one among the number either to be pleased with flattery, or to be insensible to unmerited reproach. His Royal Highness cannot but feel, and feel keenly, when he has been as undeser- vedly attacked as ungenerously abandoned, that he is left single between two parties, neither of which consider themselves as having any interest in his hdnor or repu- tation. His Royal Highness cannot but jio teel this, and he will be wanting to himself if he too suddenly forgets it. It may be great to forgive injuries, but it is certainly prudent to remember what men are. From his youth upwards, His Royal Highness has passed through every stage of his mihtary career. No one has yet ap- peared so totally wanting in all truth, as to question His Royal Highness' personal courage.: Let it be granted then, that with this acknowledged personal courage, added to the common sense which we should hope no one will deny him. His Royal Highness has at least obtained the common knowledge of his profession. Let us at least allow him what is denied to, no one, that he cannot have passed through such a course of study, and under the best masters of the age, without having acquired what is almost necessarily acquired by every one in a similar course. Grant that His Royal Highness is not superior to other Generals, why should he be inferior ? It is known to every one who approaches him, that he is not wanting in natural talents, in a solid and just understanding, and in the art of 11 observing, and availing himself of his obser- vations. Let us put it, therefore, to the candour of the Public, and of the Gentle- men of the Army, if with such an under- standing and such experience, such advan- tages of rank, and with such good masters, it is not a reasonable presumption, that His Royal Highness has at least the com- mon and sufficient knowledge of his mili- tary profession ? Surely, it is not too much to ask this concession. It is the misfortune, however, of the Duke of York, to have been placed in a peculiar situation — in a situation which has necessarily exposed him to the jealousy, the dislike, and the apprehensions of those contending parties which usually divide the country. It is the misfortune, therefore, of His Royal High- ness, that, as an object of jealousy to both parties, he has a true friend in neither, and amongst the low-minded of both has many detractors. There arc other causes, however, for this treatment of His Royal Highness ; and it is but justice to lay them open to the public. A simple Statement will be amply sufficient. C2 12 The character of the accusation ri^ay be collected from the motives of the accusers, and the conduct of the defenders. The public will be cautious how they receive, with any credit, what carries upon its very face such legible characters of an hostile origin ; they will not, at least, confound the charges with the sentence, and take the accusation as the guilt. It has been well observed by a very able Writer, that every thing in England submits to party ; that it was party that shot Byng, and made £5erinaine Minister. We will not go so farm this assertion; but they must know little of our history who shall hesitate to acknowledge, that party spirit and party interests have occasionally much misled as •—have hurried us into at least temporary injustice, and unmerited persecution. Since the days of William the Third, there have existed in this kingdom two avowed parties — an Opposition and a Mi- nistry. As a defence from the overwhelm- ing predominance of either, eVery succeed- ing Monarch has deemed it necessary to have a kind of domestic party — a kind of 13 Closet and Family Council, whom he may occasionally interpose between even his Ministry and himself. The origin of this party has been imputed to His Majesty^s Father, or rather to his Mother, whilst Dowager of Wales ; but the point of fact is, that it existed in the reign of George the First, and seems to have had no other origin than in its manifest necessity. It was not the creature of any design, or pre- vious arrangement ; but, as a matter of prudence, and necessary defensive policy, grew insensibly out of the very nature of things. Now the immediate and almost neces- sary members of this party, are certainly the King's Family and Household. From whom else, indeed, should a Family Coun- cil — a Domestic Cabinet — be composed, but of the Members of the Family — of those who must necessarily have a community of interest, and sympathy in feeling ? The Heir Apparent alone, for very obvious rea- sons, is seldom a Member of this Closet Council : all the other Princes are almost necessarily in the immediate confidence of 14 their Sovereign and Father. Let it not, therefore, be objected to the Duke of York, that he has followed the course of things, and, with the Queen, is at the head of the *' King's Friends." Yet, '' hinc illcc la- chrymce^ — Hence this avowed hostiUty on one side, and this apathy, or rather secret abetment, on the other. It is the interest of all parties to assist to beat down what is equally in the way of all. If such be the situation of the Duke of York with regard to the King's Party^ — a situation which may be fairly presumed to have had some effect against him — let us see how he is situated with respect to the present Opposition ; let us see if there be not some circumstances, which seem to point out another origin to the malice of their persecution, than their zeal, or their apprehensions for the public service. Upon the death of Mr. Pitt, the late Opposition were called to a short-lived power and office. What was their con- duct ? — Why, considering every thing at their will, they rushed forward to seize every thing with the most indecent avidity. The ^J5 King was not to choose them ; but, in consideration of the state of the kingdom, they were to offer their services : they were not even to enter upon office till they had obtained a general carte blanche, — Never was Monarch approached, in the manner in which our venerable Sovereign was ap- proached by these men. His Majesty felt most acutely the loss of his former servant, and, in the difficulties of the moment, submitted in part to the demands of the haughty faction. They were allowed to fill up their own lists, and to follow up their own general principles. Having obtained so much, they were resolved to attempt still more. They had scarcely obtained their respective appoint- ments to office, before they resolved yet more directly to wound the feelings of His Majesty. Every thing was to be undone, of what had been done by their prede- cessors. The Army was too conspicuous an object to escape them : it was fertile in patron age,r and had some immediate ap- pointments which had attracted the wistful gaze of the party^ and its dependents. 16 It was accordingly represented to His Majesty, that according to the principles upon which his Ministry had humbly of- fered their services, the pubUc expected of them, and they conceived themselves ob- liged, to introduce a perfect reform in all the branches of Public Service — that the Army wanted this reform, and that His Majesty would be pleased to consent, that a private Commission of Inqairy should be appointed to sit daily at the Horse Guards, and that the report of this Com- mission should be presented to His Ma- jesty's most gracious consideration. To this, likewise. His Majesty con- sented, and His Royal Highness did not oppose it. The List of the Commissioners was made by the Ministry, and for the sake of appearances, the name of His Royal Highness was not omitted. His Royal Highness, however, did not deem it decorous to sit on a Court of Inquiry into his own conduct. The party, therefore, and the Commission had their own Presi- dent. It is not the purpose of the present Notes to enter into any detail as to the de-. 17 Cehcy with which they executed this inqui- sition. Suffice it tp say, that after a party, and therefore a rigorous inquiry, it was not deemed prudent either to make or to present a Report. Another resolution was taken, and it was determined to attempt indirectly, and as it were by intrigue, what could not be hoped from other more direct means. It must really be matter of asto- nishment to all candid men, that indivi- duals of an honourable name, and hitherto reputed to be of corresponding sentiments, should descend to such an unworthy cun- ning. The characteristic of a great, and a little mind, says Bacon, is, that the former takes the strait road, whilst the latter creeps warily but cowardly to its object by a bye- path. ^Two measures were accordingly adopted by the party. The one was, to represent to His Royal Highness, that the multiplicity of business in the office of Commander in Chief required that His Royal Highness should have some assistance, arid that therefore the Ministry had to propose to His Royal Highness a division of hi§ Department; that the branches from which His Royal Highness woiald be thus re- lieved, might either be put in commis- sion, assigned to certain Boards, or sup- plied by individuals ; — that in the latter case the Ministry would consider it as belong- ing to them to recommend, but that the nomination should be in His Royal High- ness. That it was not amongst their wishes to diminish any thing of the Patro- nage of His Royal Highness, or to detract any thing from the splendour of the Com- mander in Chief. But that from regard to His Royal Highness, and from a deep consideration of the value of His Royal Highness's time as Commander in Chief in the higher offices of his Department, it was the anxious wish of the Ministry to relieve His Royal Highness from the subor- dinate details. A Negotiation was accordingly com- menced with His Royal Highness upon these grounds ; in the course of which His Royal Highness learned what was intended by these *' subordinate details, and minor branches.'* His Royal Highness, inaword> 19 learned, that these subordinate details, and minor branches, were such as to reduce his office to a mere cypher, and leave him as Commander in Chief, in a situation about as active, as necessary, and as important, as the Master of the Horse. His Royal High- ness very naturally felt himself offended at being entrapped even into a Negotiation in a business so adverse to his personal interests and military character ; and the Negotia- tion was accordingly broken off" with abrupt- ness and mutual disgust. Is it a reasonable subject of surprise, therefore, that thus beset, thus assailed at once by the open hostility of some, and the insiduous friendship of others. His Royal Highness deemed it necessary to throw him- self upon the immediate protection of His Royal Father, and to draw closer the bonds between himself and what has been invidu- ously called, the Family Council ? The proposed measure of the Grenville par^ was thus defeated by the hnmediate interposition, not to say the command of His Majesty. But this ambitious party, though thus disappointed, were not de- D 2 20 feated ; they invented another rallying post, and the words, *' Military Council, and Military Board of Supervision," were dis- tributed as the watch -word of the party. The idea was quickly circulated through all the Ministerial Papers, and the cry of a party was magnified into the popular voice. The people, it was said, demanded a Mili- tary Council, and the Nation would be lost, unless the inexperience of the Commander in Chief was assisted by a Board of Mili- tary Supervision. It was moreover insinu- ated in one or more of the papers of the party, that His Royal Highness was not averse to the appointment of such a Board. Every thing, in a word, was put in mo- tion to work upon the popular mind ; and to those who know of what inflammable materials the People of England are made, it is needless to insist that so many engines were not inefficacious. Nothing could be more unpleasant than the situation of His Royal Highness during all this turmoil of intrigue and faction. His open assailants were of a class with whom His Royal Highness could not, con-* 21 sistent with his personal dignity, enter into a contention. In what manner, for ex- ample, could he oppose the attack of news- papers, the assault of paragraphs, and the storm of diurnal invective ? Every news- paper was in the hands of the reigning party, or if one of them boasted of its in- dependence, it usually proved its claim by a daring attack on His Royal Highness. This abuse was usually introduced in terms expressive of the '' candour apd reluct- ance" of the writer. They were unwilling, good creatures, to wound the feelings of any individual, and particularly of one in every respect so meritorious as His Royal Highness ; but in common candour they were compelled to acknowledge, that the perilous situation of affairs called for unu- sual vigour in ' the Military Department, and that His Royal Highness would be much relieved by the appointment of a Mi- litary Council. The similarity of all these paragraphs, and certain words which were common to all, seemed to bespeak their common origin, and the public hearing the same thing said on all sides, and by all par- 2^ ties, began to conclude that there was some-' thing in it; and the press, in pamphlets and reviews, echoed back the clamour of the daily journals. To this clamour, indeed, it was inciden- tally urged by the more respectable writers, that a Military Council had been the ruin of the Austrian Monarchy ; that such a Council must necessarily either follow the person of the Commander in Chief, or re- main stationary at home. That if attached to the Commander in Chief, it established a military Imperium in Imperio^ and must so far be pernicious, as it took from the sim- plicity and absoluteness of military com- mand. That if it were to remain at home, it must be utterly useless when the armies were in the field. That it would be impos- sible to determine at home on the motions of armies abroad. That the Board of Ad- miralty for Naval Service was not a case in point : that the Naval Service was neces- sarily more uniform and simple : that the sea was a plane surface : that the Board of Admiralty was a board of correspondence rather than of military direction. 23 These arguments had no weight, not in* deed because they were deficient in reason, but because the MiUtary Council itself had no existence but as an instrument of faction* Those who were loudest in demanding it, had it least in their contemplation- There was not one of the party so deluded, as to wish it reduced into effect. It was a good catch-word for the people, and for the shal- low-brained editors and writers of the daily papers. These incessant attacks could not but very seriously affect His Royal Highness, and after having maintained a dignified re* serve as long as human patience could sup- port it, he at length found it necessary to demand an Inquiry into his conduct. Nothing could be so ridiculous as the af- fected astonishment of the Ministry upK)n this demand. Who has presumed to attack the interest or the reputation of your Royal Highness ? There are laws in the country to which your Royal Highness may appeal. Why should there be a formal inquiry where there is no formal charge ? Why should the ignorance or malignity of the daily pa- 24 pers be raised into the consequence and dig- nity of having called forth an official in- quiry ? If any thing has been said or writ- ten against your Royal Highness, of which all His Majesty's Ministers must solemnly disavow even any knowledge, the Attorney General should be ordered forthwith to commence a prosecution ; and if your Royal Highness be unwilling personally to give your instructions to that Officer of the Crown, they may be given to the Treasury, by your Royal Highness's Secretary. But His Majesty's Ministers would think them- selves deficient in a due sense of what they owed to their own dignity as His Majesty's Councillors, if they adopted a popular ru-. mour as sufficient grounds for an official inquiry. In other repeated applications of the same nature. His Royal Highness could procure only similar answers — the same mouth-honor, and the same insulting hy- pocrisy. And if any thing could add to the indignation which such treatment must inspire in a Princely mind, it was the ex- traordinary circumstance, that during ^^^ 25 very time in which they were thus perse- cuting His Royal Highness, their personal intercourse, and ministerial correspondence with him, was studiously most intimate, friendly, and conceived in terms of the most extreme confidence and harmony. In this manner, therefore, the Inquiry went oiF, and the Military Council having done its part, another weapon was put into the hands of the lower creatures of the faction. It was now hinted by some of the party writers, that the sale of Commissions produced an immense sum of money, and which money, in the extreme necessity of the public, might as well be brought into the Account of the Public Service. That it was no part of the Constitution, or even of the former practice of any Administration, that the sale of Commissions should be the perquisite of the Commander in Chief — that it was strictly public money, and as such, should be brought into strict account. To this was added a multitude of indi- rect, but intelligible allusions to the Wi- dows* Fund, Allowances, Nominal Officers on Perpetual Furlough, &c. &c. All tliese 26 were daily or weekly retailed by that pes- tiferous gang of libellers, and more par- ticularly by Cobbet. In this manner, in this urgency for a direct inquiry on one side, and this refusal to grant it on the other, passed away the whole period of the late Administration, until some time about the conclusion, when it was deemed necessary, from party expe- diency, and from motives which require no explanation, to make certain proposals to His Royal Highness. To these proposals His Royal Highness may be presumed to have answered, that it was the settled maxim of his life to belong to no party, but to consider himself as the servant and subject of the King ; — that he moreover did not agree in opinion with His Majesty's Ministers upon the points in agitation ; but did not deem it necessary to explain him- self more fully. That with respect to any opposition against him. His Royal High- ness was at a loss to understand what could be intended by it, as His Majesty's Ministers, in all His Royal Highness's de- mands for inquiry, had . repeatedly dis- n avowed their knowledge of any such personal hostility. That under all circum- stances. His Royal Highness saw no suffi- cient reason for departing from the settled maxim of all his former life, — to consider himself as a Member of the Royal Family, and the Servant of his Sovereign alone. That, least of all, therefore, could His Royal Highness have any will or opinion in contradiction to that of his father. Within a few days after this latter Nego- tiation, the Grenville and Fox party had ceased to be Ministers, and His Majesty had summoned others to his Council. It may be collected from this Statement, that neither in the commencement, nor in the conclusion of the Grenville Admini- stration, could this party be considered as friendly to His Royal Highness. This Statement, moreover, may possibly account for one part at least of the general hostility against His Royal Highness. It is not the intention of this Statement to have any thing to say to Party — Tros Tyriusve mihi. But whatever may be the other merits of the Grenville party, they E 2 ^8 will never be characterized for their humi- lity or moderation. Earl Grey may be a man of business, but he is not a direct man; — not a candid man, not an high- minded man ; — his pride is self-sufficiency, and even his honor is without delicacy ; — he is not aware of the falsehood of dissimu- lation, nor of the meanness of hypocrisy. Earl Moira is a worthy man, but is cer- tainly not a vigorous man ; he wants nothing, indeed, towards a manly con- stanc) , but a more solid judgment ; — he will do nothing wrong, but he is easily per*- ^padedthat everything is right.— If an easy temper, gentlemanly manners, and correct intentions, be sufficient to constitute a va- luable public character, Lord Moira has most assuredly these qualities. But if Phi- dia;s had reason, when he lamented that he could not give his statues life, or if there be any meaning in the fable in which the Fox complains that his masque wants brains — something is yet wanting in Earl Moira. As to Mr. Windham, he is a plea:- sant man, a very pleasant man ; one who acts as he speaks, by staits and surprizes-^ 20 without constancy either in his friendship or his enmity, and therefore without ef- fect. Such is the situation of His Royal High- ness with respect to a party all-powerful whilst in power, and who have carried with them into Opposition, all the jealou- sies conceived whilst in place. They arc pleased, moreover, to consider His Royal Highness as having had a share in their dismissal, as having concurred with the Domestic Party in indisposing their Sove- reign against them. If His Royal High- ness had so acted, the Grenville party could not have justly complained. By what moral compulsion was His Royal Highness obliged to continue in amity with those, whose whole conduct, if not their professions, was in direct hostility to him, and who by their instruments, if not by their own hands, were attacking him even in his professional reputation ? — Did any ex- ample amongst themselves warrant them in the expectation of such patience under real injuries ? — Did Earl St. Vincent pa- tiently succumb under his Libellers ? — Was J" \ 30 Earl Grey in the habit of such exemplary passiveness ? The point of fact, however, is, that His Royal Highness never for a moment forgot his early-avowed maxim, — to interfere with no Party. The late Ministry were dismissed solely because they personally offended, and con- tradicted in a point of conscience. His Majesty. His Majesty had no Council but his own mind. He had taken his resolu- tion when he summoned the attendance of the Duke of York. He conceived himself as having been deceived by Earl Grey ; he accordingly declined seeing that Nobleman. The Duke of York merely obeyed the com-: mands of his Father, when he signified by Letter His Majesty's Pleasure that Lord Howick should not come to Windsor. The King had not even seen the Duke of York when he turned his back upon the Minister, who, knowing the resolution of His Majesty upon Conscience, * * * * ^- *, But it is not the purpose of these pages to enter into any thing which may have the appearance of Party — Only let it not be urged in vindication of the bitter persecu- 31 tion of His Royal Highness by the Ex- Administration, that His Royal Highness had any thing to say to their disgrace. For their dismissal they have only to blame themselves. They fell by their own sword. There are some of the members amongst the late Ministry, from whom His Royal Highness expected a very different system of conduct than what, to his equal regret and astonishment, he has discovered to have proceeded from them. When His Royal Highness compares the professions of those to whom we allude with their actions, hq knows not how to reconcile such a wide deviation to the honorable characters of the parties. He can see as little reason in their enmity as in their professions. His Royal Highness rqust confess, indeed, that he has been deceived, and that he never ex- pected to find those amongst his enemies, with whom, whilst acting in the same gene- ral Administration, he was in the habits of familiar intercourse, and of the daily and almost hourly interchange of official kind- ness and favors. His Royal Highness is unconscious of having so Oxiended Mr. Windham, as to justify the very bitter attacks of Cobbet. His Royal Highness, however, still hopes, and indeed believes, that the attacks upon him by this Libel- ler, cannot have the approbation of Mr. Windham ; but it is certainly in the power of Mr. Windham to repress the insolence of this demagogue. As to Earl Moira, is there no other way to accomplish the object of his ambition but by tacitly at least concurring in what he must know to be a party persecution ? Does it escape his Lordship, that he is but an instrument in the hands of artful men, who use his name only to advance their own immediate purpose? Has his Lord- ship forgotten, that during the ministry of his associates, these very men conceived a similar ill-blooded jealousy against himself, and took offence at his intimate intercourse with the Prince of Wales ? There may be means of procuring a Command, without seeking it at the expence of the Com- mander in Chief. With respect to the Ministry, His Royal Highness is about as favourably situated as the Editors of the Daily Papers thus write, unless they were persuaded that they were advocating a cause generally pleasing to their patrons ? As to a legal remedy for this torrent of libel and invective, though His Royal Highness is persuaded that a Jury of his countrymen would visit his Libellers with merited punishment, he can- not persuade himself to introduce a prac- tice which he has never approved. There have been perhaps already too many Go- vernment prosecutions, and a precedent may thus be constituted, which, much to the injury of the free press, may be here- after acted upon. Add to this, that there may be innumerable allusions, innuendoes, and even assertions, which may have sub- stance enough to wound, '<\nd that most deeply, but are not palpable enough for the visitation of the Law. The Libellers of His Royal Highness have been too lono^ practised in their school, to commit them- selves to the hands of a Jury. Let any man of honest feeling read some of the cold-blooded articles which have, lately appeared in many.x)f the Daily Papers, 42 and then answer, if his indignation be not moved by their savage mahgnity — Yet are these hbels conceived in terms so studiously picked and culled as to elude the just vengeance of the Law. ' How many subjects, moreover, are there, which, however grossly offensive to all honorable feeling, cannot be produced to the publicity of a legal trial. Let any man put it to his own mind — how many slan- derous reports are daily in circulation to the ruin of the peace and character of their unhappy object, but for which the sufferer is yet unwilling to make his appeals to the laws of his country. There is * a necessary and indiscriminating publicity in law, from which a mind of any delicacy cannot but avert. His Royal Highness has indeed suffered much, but he will suffer still more, before he can persuade himself to call on, the laws of his country. ► Why is not His Royal Highness granted the inquiry which he solicits ? This inquiry is still as strangely refused a^ it is anxiously desired. It may be demanded, perhaps, why does not His Royal Highness insist 43 upon it. The answer is at hand, and is in- telligible to all. His Royal Highness has naturally no wish to have the Ministry in direct opposition to him. He solicits the inquiry, but he will not compel it. If there be any thing to investigate, let it be investigated. His Royal Highness would have better supported these attacks, malignant as they have been, if they had assumed any shape in which he could have met them. But not a distinct charge is brought forward. Every thing is shrouded in generality. It is in vain to defend where there is no point of attack. The Libellers of His Royal Highness can produce neither fact nor evi- dence. They are evidently only the instru- ments of a Party. They have only the assumed zeal of advocates ; many of them are even w^ell- wishers to His Royal High- ness, and few, or, none of them, have any personal enmity against him. But His Royal Highness has the misfortune to have been th^ topic of the day, — they are com- pelled, therefore, to say something of him, and they consider it as their duty to render G 2 44 . that something as palatable as possible to their patrons. Againbt such accusers as these, it would be almost an indelicacy to enter into a la- boured Defence of His Royal Highness's professional character. Let them produce, we say, a distinct charge, and they shall have a distinct answer, but whilst they only beat about the bush, — whilst they are no sooner met upon one ground, than they retreat to another, in what manner is their desultory m'alice to be brought within tlae pale of an argumentative defence ? It is from these causes that His Royal Highness firids it necessary to demand that the Ministry shall at length take some open and decided part in the warfare against him, and that himself, his friends, and his enemies, shall have the common justice of a fair inquiry. If there has been any mal- administration in the Duke of York's de- partment, let a Commission of Inquiry be appointed, and the allegations examined with the forms and substance of natural justice ; — liis Royal Highness may then put in his memorial of defence — he will 45 know how to plead w^hen his accusers can be brought to join issue. In the mean time, it is surely not too much to require the two contending parties of the kingdom, the Ministry and the Op- position, most distinctly to disavow the existing system of persecution against His Royal Highness's person and reputation. Under such a disavowal, this disgraceful system will necessarily fall to the ground- If the offensive matter be not immediately dictated or suggested by Party, it is at least fostered and kept in existence under the presumption of the approbation of the re- spective Leaders ; — let the Ministry and the Opposition disavow it, and the Duke of York will have no farther cause of complaint* With respect to the Earl of Moira, wc must again recommend to him a new sys* tem of conduct, more w^orthy of the cha- racteristic honour of a Nobleman ever re- puted the most honourable of his rank. It is an injustice to his real worth, to allow himself to become the instrument of any faction whatever. It is in direct contra- -46 diction to his natural and known candour, to act in a system which is necessarily indi- rect, and the necessary means to the suc- cess of which are cunning, and privy-plot- ting. The reputation of the Earl of Moira wants not the aid of hired writers — Pro- fessional Command is always within his reach. As to Earl Grey, we shall take our leave of him by briefly reminding him, that Party differences should not be resented with personal animosity, and that an harsh temper is in no respect necessary to a pub- lic character. Earl Grey's talents of busi- ness are respectable — why does he diminish any of their due eff^ect by a pompous in- anity ? With more corpplacency of temper, and less s^^lf-sufficiency, Earl Grey may be a welcome associate to any future Admi- nistration. Even just resentments should not be eternal, and still less, those which may have originated in misconception. Let Earl Grey allow to others what he has occasionally so liberally allowed to him- self. Supposing certain affairs to have 47 been as represented, with what reason could Earl Grey complain ? By what ob- ligation was His Royal Highness to return indifference with the offices of friendship ? —His Royal Highness was at no time a Member of the Grenville Ministry. His Royal Highness, we believe, had flattered himself, that the seeming atten- tions of Mr. Canning, and his voluntary professions in an affair of inconsiderable importance, were not totally without mean- ing. Mr. Canning is possessed of a gen- tlemanly mind, a just and glowing genius ; and, as His Royal Highness had reason .to believe, of a pride above disguise, and with an high disdain of dissimulation. Whence in his recent conduct, or rather in his recent apathy, has Mr. Canning rendered doubt- ful his sentiments and disposition towards His Royal Highness ? Why has he given such ready and credulous ear to rumours intended only to divide those whom the public service and the common personal interest should keep together ? Let it be granted, that an emulation of honour, a contest for influence, may exist in the Cabinet, — does it thence necessarily follow, that His Royal Highness should be com- pelled to take part either with the one or the other ? His Royal Highness is not dis- posed, we presume, to deny what he owes of gratitude and personal friendship to Lord ; but neither on this, nor on any other occasion, has His Royal Highness found it necessary to depart from the set- tled maxim of his life, — not to intermeddle with Parties, — to consider the existing Ad- ministration as a kind of domestic esta- bUshment, a species of family arrange- ment, belonging peculiarly to His Majesty, and as such, sacred from all private inter • position. If Mr. Canning or any of the Ministry, will but take the trouble to recall the past to their memories, they will need no assu- rances of His Royal Highness, that he has a high scorn of that intrigue and counter- action of which he has been so unjustly accused. His Royal Highness, moreover, can have no conceivable motive for such a sys'cm of conduct — he does not lack pro- motion — *' he has the King's Voice for 33 with the Opposition. The enmity of the one may be as easily accounted for on the ordinary passions of mankind as the other. His Royal Highness, however, does not complain that the existing Administration are not friendly to him. Friendship is not a thing of right on one side or of obligation on the other. He never sought the friend- ship of 'Ministers, and therefore has no complaint that he does not possess it. There is, however, or at least there should be, a middle term between friendship and enmity. His Royal Highness, therefore, can see no justifying cause for the conduct of Administration. When His Majesty had resolved to con- stitute-^ a new Administration, His Royal Highness had it in Command from the King to inform the Duke of Portland of His Majesty's intentions. His Royal High- ness executed His Majesty's Commands in person. He repeated only the words of the King, and distinctly informed the Duke of Portland, that he was to consider His Royal Highness in no other point of view than as the messenger bearing certain words of His Majesty ;- — that he had no list^ and no authority to designate any indivi- dual whatever. In a conversation which followed, His Royal Highness distinctly gave his Grace to understand, that he wished to have no concern whatever with toy Pa^rt}', farther than to act sincerely And cordially with any men whom His Majesty might call to his confidence. When the Ministry was formed, it was ijfltimated to His Royal Highness by the Duke, that his recommendation, in a cer* tarn appointment, would be attended to; trpon which His Royal Highness again re- plied, that he had merely executed the tvishes of the King; — rthat he wished to be considered as forming no part of any Ad- mmi^tfation whatever ; and that if any diffi- ttilty* occurred as to a suitable person for the appointment in question. His Grace would do well to consult witli Lord Hawkesbury, who had the King's Com- mands in detail- Such was the share, and such the only share, which His Royal Highness had in *the for matioa of the existing Administra- S5 tron. It may be collected from these par-t ticulars, that on this, as on every other occasion. His Royal Highness never de* parted a moment from his se^tled resolution, never to become a component part of any Ministry. Some time after the formation of the Ca- binet, His Royal Highness had an appointed conference with one of the Members of Ad- ministration, in the course of which, a sub- ject of much interest to His Royal High-* ness was introduced. To this His Royal Highness ^gain replied, that it was in the power of any Member of either House to bring it forward ; that he wished not to in* flaence either the one way or the other. That the papers should be ready when called for. That he certainly did not wish the Mi^ nistry to take any part against him. That as the subject itself would be brought forward as a party question, if brought forward at all, the Ministry might, perhaps, deem it their duty to take some share in the debate. Through all these transactions, His Royal 'Highness was at a loss to discover any thing which could reasonably indispose th.e Mi- F 2 56 nistry against him. The Administration, indeed, had endeavoured in vain to annex His Royal Highness, by a distinct pledge, to their own immediate party. But His Royal Highness had no suspicion, that by adhering to the uniform maxim of his life, he mast necessarily give oiTence to any party whatever. His Royal Highness, moreover, never hesitat'ed to avow, that he would al- ways persevere in that line of acting which he should know to be conformable to the sentiments of His Majesty. It IS from this per od, however, that His Royal •Highness is compelled to date the oririn of the Ministerial Alienation. The Ministry seem resolved to compel everyone to take a party — even His Majesty's Sons must fall within the ranks. His Royal Highness, we will presume to say, is perfectly unconscious of having given any personal offence to Mr. Canning, or any of the Ministers ; yet if any judgment may be formed from the conduct of these Gen- tlemen, they seem to h-.ve entertained no inconsiderable personal animosity against His Royal Highness. Party-feeling seldom 37 proceeds so far as the unwearied persecu- tion of individual enmity. There have, indeed, been instances, in which the whole weight of a party has been brought to bear against an individual; but in these cases some reasonable cause might be assigned for such excess of bitterness. But in what has His Royal Highness so offended all, that he is not onty deserted by all, but per- secuted by all ? Surely there must be some cause beyond what appears. With respect to Lord Castlereagh, we be- lieve that His Royal Highness has no cause of complaint ; on the other hand, that he owes him much on the part of friendship ; a friendship more welcome, as it was unos- tentatiously exerted. We are persuaded that His Royal Highness feels a gratitude suit- able to the occasion. His Royal Highness is not wanting in sensibility either for fa- vours or injuries. ToLordHawkesbury, likewise, His Royal Highness owes much ; and had it not been for the protection of this Nobleman — for protection it must be called — and of his fa- ther, the Earl of Liverpool, it is impos- 8S sible to say to what extent the faction against His Royal Highness might have proceeded. Yet upon Lord Hawkesbury^ and upon his father. Lord Liverpool, His Royal Highness had no other claims than tpon the Ministry in common ; for Lord Ha.vkesbury and I^ord Liverpool owe His Royal Highness nothing but justice and fair dealing. But this is in fact all that the Duke of York w^ants. Let him be attacked fairly, and with honourable weapons, and from honourable hands, and His Royal Highness has nothing to apprehend. He will then meet the attack with a suitable defence. It may be urged, indeed, in reply to all that has been said above, that the attacks pomplained of, have not been made with the knowledge, and still less with the con- sent or concurrence of His Majesty's Minis- ters: that they are all of them too ho- pourable men to concur in such a system of anonymous attack: that such a system, moreover, could answer no conceivable purpose: that the Ministry ^are too strong in public opinion and confidenccj^ to require 39 the assistance of such unworthy arts. In a word, that such a persecution, and so in- directly put into operation, can have no purpose, and therefore that it is a reason^ able inference that it has no existence. To this it must be answered, that when tlis Royal Highness made similar represcn-^ tations, under the late Ministry, the answer was uniformly, that His Majesty's Minis* ters were totally ignorant of the very existf ence of the facts alleged ; that the Law was open to His Royal HighncbS, and that the Attorney General might be instructed to prosecute ; that they had no influence or au- thority over the free press ; and that they advised His Royal Highness to hold all such libellous accusation in the contempt which it merited. k is notorious, however, notv/ithstandr ing all this disavowal, that the free press, as it is called, and as it should be, is almost equally divided between the two leading Parties in the country, and that the Ministers and the Opposition have the same influence, not to say authority, ^verthem, as if they were the-actual Edi- 40 tors. Has any instance ever occurred, in which a billet from Downing Street has been refused admission, and if required, an ample confirmatory comment, through all the Treasury Papers ? And will any, either of the Ministry or the Opposition, declare, upon their honour as Gentlemen, that they have no authority or weight with the Public Papers ? Whence does it hap- pen, that the honour of parties is not the same with that of individuals, and that a party will assert conjunctively, what every individual of that party knows to be false ? Why is there not the same point of honour with a party as with an individual ? The indecent language in the Daily Pa- pers, is certainly not from the mouth of the Ministers. It is impossible that men of honourable station should descend to such terms, and to such anonymous acri- mony. We are persuaded that His Royal Highness most fully acquits His Majesty's Ministers of any immediate participation in such libels. But the encouragement, the countenance, the impunity of these Libellers, is the efficient cause of the whole. Would 49 what he is"— He h'as the King's approba- tion for his faithful discharge of his duties. How many occasions have of late years fallen out, in which His Royal Highness, if he had been so disposed, might have taken an active and a commanding part in some or other of the successive Parties and Administrations. Will it be denied, that His Royal Highness was courted to conde- scend to this system? Will it be denied, that on every such occasion he has invari- ably returned the same answer — that he would not become a component member of any Administration, for that he would not put himself into a state of circum- stances, in which it might be eventually necessary to act against the will of his Father. With such opinions, so freely avowed, and so notoriously acted upon, whence can originate the absurd suspicion said to be so current amongst His Majesty's Ministers, that His Royal Highness had any share ia the friendly emulation of the two Members of the Cabinet, whose inconsiderable differ- ences, much to His Royal Highnesses satis- H so faction, have been of late so happily coni- posed. His Royal Highness^ we believe, was not even asked to take any part in the contest, and least of all, to take that unfair part, which is inferred in the language of the vague rumour. The Noble Person. in question would scorn to gain his purpose-, if purpose he had, by. such arts — his com- Tnanding abilities — his habits, and know- ledge of business, distinguish him suffi- •^ciently eminently. If there be any one who Vould most passionately scorn the indirect aid of the alleged intrigue, and w^ho cer- tainly stands in no need of it, it is the per- son in question. His Majesty knows the worth of such a Servant, and will not ^iiastily either deprive himself of it, or by w^ithholding any merited grace, diminish the zeal of his scrvic . Upon this subject, therefore, we will most decidedly state, that His Royal Highness had no concern -whatever, and that he knew not that the emulation existed, except by general report. His Royal Highness would make no com- plaint, if it should be made to appear, that in any one- single instaace His Royal Highness had acted any part against the existing Cabinet. But His Royal Highness, we beheve, under no apprehension what* ever, neither by indirect persecution, nor bv direct appeal, will be induced to depart from the maxim so often repeated, — neves' to associate himself as a Member to any Party. When the late Ministry retired, His Royal Highness candidly expressed, that his opinions were not with them. His Royal Highness deemed it necessary to rally around his Father, whose dearest object yet remaining in life, was to preserve the JNational Religion in the same state in which he had received it. His Royal Highness most assuredly conceived the Establishment to have been endangered by the avowed .principles of tl^at Administration. - With respect to the Duke of Portland, His Royal Highness, we believe, has some acknowledgments to make. His Grace has fully answered the public expectations of the Country. He was called to Office, twhen the lofty tone and predominant ma- jority of a ruling faction, would have scared H 2 52 a common mind. With a just confidence in himself, however, His Grace accepted His Majesty's invitation ; and the event has left the Country nothing to regret, but that His Grace's health is not as vigorous as his understanding. Long may the dignified friend of the lamented Burke continue to enjoy the confidence of the Sovereign, and the esteem of the People : it is the just re- ward of a youth and age employed in the public service. In the high-minded loyalty of the Duke of Portland, and in the inflexi- ble integrity of Lord Eldon, His Majesty might find a secure refuge even in more pe- rilous times. It is some consolation, that, amidst the storms of the times, the Coun- try has such Anchors. In the preceding observations, we have purposely avoided saying any thing as to a rumoured Appointment of His Royal High- ness. The point of fact perhaps is, that such Appointment was never anxiously so- licited on the one part, or offered, except formally, on the other. His Royal Highness is always prompt to ob«y the call of the Public Service; but it has not been the prac- tice of His Royal Highness to solicit favours from any Administration. If the nature of the service had been such as to require the employment of the Commander in Chief, the Ministry would doubtless have intimated it to His Royal Highness. His Royal Highness would doubtless deem it an indirect injustice to himself, to enter into any vindication of his professional capacity. Nor will the friends of His Royal Highness so dignify the tribe of Libellers, as to join issue with them upon a point of this kind. His Military Character will neither depend upon their conviction, nor be injured by their decision. I'finted by B. M'Miilan, 7 BoW'Screet, Covent-Garden, $