THE HOUSE OF ATREUS. THE HOUSE OF ATREUS BEING THE AGAMEMNON, LIBATION-BEARERS, AND FURIES OF AESCHYLUS. TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH VERSE BY E. D. A. MORSHEAD, M.A LATE FELLOW OF NEW COLLEGE, OXFORD, ASSISTANT MASTER OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE. Some mourning words, which in our feeble tongue Would come in these like accents ; O how frail To that large utterance of the early gods ! Hyperion. IConlion : SIMPKIN AND MARSHALL. STATIONERS' HALL COURT. Minrljester : WARREN AND SON, 85. HIGH STREET. WINCHESTER : BARREN AND SON, 85, HIGH ST [All rights resened.} DEDICATED TO EDWARD CHARLES WICKHAM. 2022128 PREFACE. son of Euphorion, an Athenian of the deme of Eleusis, was bom, B.C. 525. He consecrated his life to the tragic art from his youth upwards : yet he is held to have been a valiant soldier, and with his brother Cynegirus to have fought at Marathon, and at Salamis, and at Platsea as some say. Afterwards, being at variance with the Athe- nians, he went away from them unto Sicily, and dwelt at the court of Hiero, tyrant of Gela, and was held by him in high honour. He died in his sixty-ninth year by a strange fate, whereof he had been warned in an oracle, saying A stroke from heaven shall slay thee. For as he was walking on the shore, an eagle, that had snatched up a tortoise into the air, let it drop ; and it fell upon him, and he died. Such is almost all that we are told, and more than we can be said to know certainly, of the life of the poet, whose masterpiece I have done my best to render into English verse, with the hope of helping one or two of those to whom the original is a closed book, to share in its treasures. The remaining fragments of tradition the cause of his quarrel with his countrymen the statement that he divulged the Sacred Mysteries remain, not now to be verified. Of PREFACE. those given above, the tale of his death has been preserved for its striking singularity : it has the authority of story, and no more. To his familiarity with war, by land and sea, his surviving dramas bear the strongest witness. There is a priori likelihood, and intrinsic evidence, and some external testimony, of his having shared in one or more of the great battles which saved the western world. Nor does his departure from Athens to whatever cause it was due nor his residence, apparently on two separate occasions, in Sicily, admit of doubt. A vague statement* that his poetry was inspired by wine a portraiture of him by the pen of Aristophanes in the Frogs (intended, as, I am convinced, those of Euripides and Socrates by the same hand were intended, mainly as a literary portrait of the author and teacher, not a delineation of the man as he was) ; some notices! from Aristotle of the improvements intro- duced by him into the arrangements of the dramatic stage : these, and a few others, form the whole of our scanty information respecting the life of ^Eschylus, son of Euphorion. Slat magni nominis umbra. Of his works there remain to us seven dramas only, out of a very large number. Fragments or notices bring up the total to seventy-eight plays of which the titles are known. If we can judge of those we have not, in any degree, by those which we have, and many of the fragments lead us towards such an estimate, the chaos of lost things holds no equal treasure : but it is not now to be rescued ; in his own words Perhaps a list of the surviving dramas may be useful to those wishing to form an idea of the poet's scope and range. * Athen. x, p. 428, F. t Poet. 4, Hor. A. P. /. 278 ; Themistius Or. 26. PREFACE. These plays (in the chronological order that seems most probable) are I. The Suppliant Maidens. The Scene is laid at Argos. II. The Prometheus Bound. The Scene is on a Scythian peak, looking doumfrom afar upon the Euxine. III. The Persians. Scene The Tomb of Darius at Susa, the treasure city of the king of Persia. IV. The Seven against Thebes. Scene, the City of Thebes in Baotia. i V. The Agamemnon. VI. The Libation-Bearers. I VII. The Furies. Of these three last plays, which form a consecutive whole, called a Trilogy, and yet are individually complete, the scene is Argos or Mycensc : * afterwards, the Temple of Apollo at Delphi : lastly, the Acropolis and Areopagus at Athens. Of an Athenian Trilogy (i.e., a combination of three dramas by the same hand, whether on the same or different subjects, for consecutive presentment on the same day, and followed by a lighter play called a Satyric Drama), there * Argos and Mycenas are in reality about six miles apart, in the great xorXo* "Ap>o?, wide valley of Argolis. The relics of the dynasty of Atreus are undoubtedly at Mycenae. ^Eschylus however calls the scene, always, Argos : not caring to particularize about a district so well known. The fact that he describes the beacon fire on Mount Arachne as visible to the palace need not lead us to conclude that he had Argos more in mind than Mycenae : though the mountain is visible (if I remember right) from Larissa, the citadel of Argos, and not (I am sure) from the Acropolis of Mycenae. The beacon-glare would have been clearly seen from either, no doubt But ./Eschylus ignores such detail : as Mr. Clark (Peloponnesus, p. 70) remarks, every Athenian saw daily from his own hills the peak of Arachne to the south, and knew it looked upon the region of Argos : and this was enough for the poet PREFACE. remains to us this solitary specimen : of the Satyric Drama, the Cyclops of Euripides, familiar to English readers by Shelley's translation. It may be added, to explain the apparent difficulty of listening continuously to three dramas, each in itself a perfect whole, that, in the first place, a whole day of leisure, and not the few last hours, between work or play, and sleep, of an exhausted audience, was devoted to the Theatre ; and secondly, that the whole length of the three plays combined which form this Trilogy is rather less than that of Hamlet. I do not say that they would not necessarily take longer to act than Hamlet : but merely that the intellectual strain, to an appreciative audience, would not necessarily be greater. Change of interest, not mere rest, is the essential relaxation of the mind, and this, which Shakespeare provides, e.g., by the soliloquies of Hamlet, the Greek dramatists and pre- eminently ^Eschylus provided by the Choric Odes, or chants inserted between the several episodes of the play. Of such Odes, this Trilogy, and especially the Agamemnon, presents to us the noblest surviving specimens. They may be regarded as the poet's profoundest musings on the moral and religious and historical problems suggested by the mythical tale which forms the groundwork of his drama. Of the grandeur, the preternatural effect, of these musings, while the imminent doom is preparing, no words of explanation or translation can give an adequate account. If it is lawful to adopt words written for a very different purpose by a poet in whom survives more of the spirit of ^Eschylus than in any other -modern one might say of these choric odes, " They are as a pause, a breathing-space, a curtain behind which God, the great scene-shifter, prepares the last and supreme act of the mighty drama. Listen, how, in the deep shadow behind, a dull and heavy sound is waxing ! Listen, what footstep is that which passes to PREFACE. and fro ? Look ! how the curtain sways and waves and trembles before the breath of that which is behind ! " * Of the mythical tale, well known as it is, which forms the groundwork of this Trilogy, some slight sketch may be useful. Atreus and Thyestes, sons of Pelops, fled from their father and dwelt at Argos with Eurystheus the king thereof: and when he died, Atreus f ruled in his place, and wedded his daughter. But Thyestes wronged his brother's wife, and was banished from Argos. And after a while he returned again, and clung unto the altar at Argos; and Atreus, fearing to slay him, devised this deed. He slew certain of the children of Thyestes, and bade him to a banquet, and gave him to eat of his own children's flesh : and he ate, knowing not what it was. But when he knew what was done, he spake a bitter curse upon the house of Atreus, that they all should perish by a doom like that of his own children. And there befel these woes unto that house, that for three generations the curse of murder departed not away. For the children of Atreus, Agamemnon and Menelaus, wedded the daughters of Leda, Clytemnestra and Helen : and afterwards Paris the son of Priam, being the guest of Menelaus, did bear away Helen his queen unto Troy. And Agamemnon and Menelaus went forth to vengeance against Paris and Troy. But Artemis was wroth with the brothers, and forbade their ships to sail ; and they lay at Aulis many days. And Calchas the prophet pro- claimed that they should not go forth, unless Agamemnon * V. Hugo, Napoleon le Petit, ch. last. t The position of Pleisthenes in the family of Atreus seems doubtful, though the lineage is twice called by his name. (Ag. II. 1569, 1602). Atreus is distinctly called father of Agamemnon (/. 1561), yet tradition rather holds that Pleisthenes was son of Atreus and father of Agamemnon and Menelaus, but, dying young, left his children to the care of their grandfather Atreus. PREFACE. should offer up his daughter Iphigenia in sacrifice unto Arteinis. And the king was unwilling so to do : yet for his oath's sake, and for his brother and the captains of the fleet, he consented, and offered up his daughter : and the fleet sailed. And they besieged Troy for nine years, and in the tenth year it fell. But Clytemnestra, the wife of Agamemnon, was wroth because of her daughter's death ; and she did evil with yEgisthus, the youngest son of Thyestes ; and they plotted to murder Agamemnon when he should return, and sent away his son Orestes unto Strophius, king of Phocis, that he might not know what they did. And when Agamemnon came back from Troy Clytemnestra received him gladly, and led him into the palace : and as he was bathing himself, she flung over him a net, and smote him, and he died : and Clytemnesti'a and ^Egisthus ruled in Argos. But Orestes heard of his father's wrongful death, and went unto the oracle of Delphi to enquire thereof, and Apollo bade him avenge his father, and not spare his own mother but slay her. And secretly he came to Argos, bearing feigned news of his own death in Phocis, and so came into the palace of his father again, and slew his mother Clytemnestra and ^Egisthus. Then was he dis- traught and maddened by the Furies, in revenge for Clytemnestra's slaying : and he wandered over the earth, seeking purification for his deed, but the Furies followed him. At last he came to the temple of Delphi, and clung to the altar : and the God cast a deep sleep over the Furies, and bade him fly to Athens, where he should find safety. But the ghost of Clytemnestra arose from the shades and awoke the Furies, and they followed him, and were wroth with Apollo. And they held dispute on the Acropolis, and Athena bade certain of the men of Athens decide the cause with her. And in the end they proclaimed the deed of PREFACE. xiii Orestes to have been rightly done, and the guilt of matricide to have been wiped away. Then the Furies were angered with Athena and her land : but Athena promised them great honour from the Athenians, and a sacred dwelling place in the land, even a cave beneath Areopagus ; and they were appeased, and were called no more Furies, but Gracious Goddesses. And Orestes went back unto his father's kingdom, and the curse of blood upon the house of Atreus was stayed.* It will be obvious, even from a compendium like the foregoing, that the myth is an epic in itself : and regarding ^Eschylus' treatment of it as a whole, we may discern a special propriety in the poet's recorded saying, that his dramas were "scraps from the lordly feast of Homer." I have sometimes fancied that an interesting parallel might be drawn between the three parts of the Trilogy, and the three divisions of the Divina Commedia. For we have in both, the same central idea ; the succession, that is, of guilt, atonement, absolution. Dante fixes his epic in the future world, ^Eschylus in the present: but mutatis mutandis, substituting the deepest religious thought of Athens for that of the middle ages, the most shadowy and gigantic vision of retributory forces for the clearest and most distinct we shall find the parallel curiously suggestive, to say the least, of the essential unity of moral speculation. The first part of the Trilogy, the drama Agamemnon, takes up the above myth at the point where Agamemnon's return from Troy is being anxiously awaited at Argos, in the tenth year of the war. The first choric ode recalls some of the previous history, dwelling * I have ventured to give to the whole Trilogy the title of The House of Atreus as the name most applicable to all three parts. The older name Oresteia seems to me to have meant, in Aristophanes, (Frogs, 1124), The Libation-Bearers only : it is hardly applicable to the Agamemnon, xiv PREFACE. particularly on the circumstances of the sacrifice of Iphigenia. Then follows the appearance of the Herald, and of Agamemnon ; the treacherous welcome of Cly- temnestra; the prophecy of Cassandra, daughter of Priam, now a captive in Agamemnon's train ; the murder of the king, and Clytemnestra's savage exultation over his body and that of Cassandra. With the appearance of yEgisthus, and his avowal of his plot and motives, the drama closes, leaving Clytemnestra and her paramour in supreme power over Argos. The second part, called the Choephoroi, or Libation- Bearers from the duty imposed upon the chorus of pouring libations on Agamemnon's tomb opens with the secret return of Orestes, the mutual recognition of himself and his sister Electra, and their invocation of the sleepless spirit of their father to aid their planned revenge. Then Orestes, assuming the character of a Phocian stranger, recounts to Clytemnestra a feigned tale of his own death in that land. Then, received into the palace, he slays ^Egisthus and Clytemnestra, and avows his commission from Apollo to do the deed. But already his " are but wild and whirling words ;" and, maddened by the guilt of blood, he sees the Furies arise, with dark robes and snaky hair; and, calling on Apollo for protection, he flees wildly away.* * Two scenes of the Trilogy have been thus admirably sketched by Mr. Browning in " Pauline." "Old lore, Loved for itself and all it shows ; the king Treading the purple calmly to his death, While round him, like the clouds of eve, all dusk, The giant shades of fate, silently flitting, Pile the dim outline of the coming doom. And the boy With his white breast and brow, and clustering curls, Streaked with his mother's blood, and striving hard To tell his story ere his reason goes." PREFACE. The third part, called The Furies (the Greek name " Euuienides " signifying literally " The Gracious Ones," from the change in the nature of the Furies with which the drama closes), opens at Delphi in the temple of Apollo. The Furies lie in sleep, made drowsy by the God : Orestes clings to the altar : Apollo bids him be of good hope, and depart unto Athens while the Furies are yet asleep. As he passes from the stage, the ghost of Clytemnestra rises and calls the slumbering Furies to arise and pursue the criminal. Then Apollo himself, with words of loathing, bids them forth from his temple ; and scenting like hounds the truck of blood, they follow the flying Orestes. Here the scene shifts to Athens ; Orestes, having followed the behest of Apollo, clings to the statue of Athena on the Acropolis, and claims her aid. The cause is tried, appar- ently on Areopagus (the scene probably representing both the Acropolis and the adjacent Areopagus) Athena pre- siding, Apollo pleading Orestes' part, the Furies impeaching him of matricide. The votes are cast, and found equal, for acquittal and condemnation ; and this result, as Athena has previously ruled, gives Orestes the benefit of the doubt. The Furies, wroth at being thus defrauded of their victim, vow vengeance on Athena's land and nation : but she appeases them by promising them honourable worship for ever, as gracious and fostering Powers of Earth, from her own Athenians : and so, solemnly escorted by torches and processions, they pass down into their subterranean cave beneath Areopagus, with words of blessing upon Attica; and the third and last part of the Trilogy closes with joy and with extinction of the curse. It will appear by a glance at this plot that the Agamemnon and The Libation- Bearers are both of them Tragedies in the accepted modern sense ; the one closing with the death of Agamemnon and the triumph of murder and adultery ; the other, with the death of Clytemnestra and with madness as xvi PREFACE. the reward of matricide. The Furies might seem, to modern eyes, less a tragedy than a drama of restoration ; yet it con- forms in all respects to the Aristotelian definition of Tragedy. The situation is undeniably tragic, though the conclusion dispels the gloom. The Trilogy is ^Eschylus' presentment of two problems, each of eternal import, though the form in which he contemplated them was the common theme of the Greek drama. These problems are : I. The Retribution of Crime. II. The Inheritance or Transmission of Evil. The views of the poet on each may perhaps be illustrated by a few excerpts from his writings. It has been pointed out (Plumptre, Biographical Essay) that, in many cases, they are reflections on the o,3oy jtxXa6^oi sATTK IpTfotTttv. Occasionally, as in the prophecy of Calchas, the oracular style is purposely assumed ; or, as in The Furies, /. 285 sqq.) a scene of monstrous horrors is described in monstrous terms ; but of real bombast, of large language misapplied, there is no more. With this disappearance, a new faculty has arisen : a dramatic art of the most admirable kind. Not even the excellent double interest of the CEdipus Tyrannus of Sophocles is superior to the scene of Clytem- nestra's welcome of Agamemnon, Avith its effusive insincerity and ominous words of double and deadly meaning. The whole character of Clytemnestra is a refutation of those who maintain that we may find poetry in ^Eschylus, but must go to Sophocles or Euripides for drama. Nor must we omit to notice the marvellous art displayed in the whole episode of Cassandra. Her spirit is utterly full of Apollo, the Sun- God, the Slayer of Night : a mention, nay, a mere hint of him (TTvdofcpavTa, I. 1255) banishes in a moment her brief sanity, and she bursts into ravings again. She is penetrated with the " fire intolerant and intense " of his coming, of the sunrise of prophecy burning brighter and clearer, while in its light the great waves of doom roll up and on. His approach is a scorching glow of fire, before his presence is revealed, O ITVfl' 7TJITai "A7To?iAo>* PREFACE. xxiii " Ah, ah the fire ! it waxes, nears me now Woe, woe for me, Apollo of the dawn ! " And her last speech is a cry to the actual sun, whose light she will see no more for ever, to light her avengers to their work. Close inspection of all this scene will show ^Eschylus at his very highest point of inspiration ; it is as true, and as imaginative, as anything in King Lear. With respect to the text, I think I have only once departed from usual interpretations. Where the text is mutilated or corrupt I have supplied or amended, as the context seemed to direct, to the extent of a word or two. (See Appendix to The Libation-Bearers.} The one occasion where my version differs, I believe, from any yet suggested, is the celebrated passage (Ag. II. 105-7) : This I have interpreted in opposition to those who have taken a\ica o~v/j,vTO<; alwv will thus be parallel to that in dyijpa) yjpovui Swdaras of Sophocles Ant. /. 608. Undoubtedly there is a difficulty in applying such a phrase as crv/iv CTU//, indeed, but not a\.fea(rv/j,