361 Burney Commentary on the Systems which have been advanced for explaining the planetary Motions THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES 'A 'N ' A COMMENTARY THE SYSTEMS WHICH HAVE BEEN ADVANCED FOR EXPLAINING THE PLANETARY MOTIONS. BY JAMES BURNEY, ESQ. OF THE BOYAL NAVY, AND F.R.S. HonHon : Printed by Luke Hansard % Sons, near Lincoln's-Inn Fieldt, 1819. QB 3GI B.93c TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE SIR JOSEPH BANKS, BART. K.B. SIR, TN so hazardous an undertaking as deliver- ing unreserved opinions upon the Systems of the Planetary Motions which have been proposed by the greatest astronomers, it is impossible not to have hesitated between the fear of committing mistakes, and the hope of furnishing ideas that might assist the advancement of Astronomy. How far it will be allowed excusable to have ventured with such uncertain prospect, will much depend upon the degree in which I shall have avoided the one, or succeeded in the other. Though I do not flatter myself that this Essay will prove an offering deserving your A 2 acceptance IV DEDICATION. acceptance, I could not refuse myself the satisfaction of dedicating it to you, as the distinguished Promoter of Science, in all its branches, and President of the most learned Society in this kingdom ; allow me to add also, in acknowledgment of the many years friendship with which you have honoured me, as a small token of the sincere respect and esteem with which I am, and have the honour to subscribe myself, Sir, Your much obliged and most obedient humble servant, JAMES BURNEY. A COMMENTARY On tfie Systems which have been advanced for explaining the PLANETARY MOTIONS. T T will doubtless appear to the Reader of the following treatise, as it has done to the Author himself, a species of disloyalty like the with- holding a due allegiance, to controvert opinions which have been long generally established, and which were originally received upon authorities the most highly respected of those which have given support to any system that has been imagined for explaining the economy and the processes of Nature, in the disposition of the heavenly bodies. The Author therefore does not publish it without considerable apprehen- sion, as he must be aware that a failure on his part will incur a heavy charge of rashness and presumption. Wherein he differs from such authorities is not in mathematical deductions j it is purely in the contemplation and conception AS of of the subject. His reasonings and opinions are of the plainest kind, and might have been entertained without the necessity of mathe- matical knowledge beyond the first four rules of arithmetic. Investigation intended to trace generally the natural course of uninformed matter, is apt to bring into discussion the divine superintendence. Arguing the government of the Universe by a chain of consequences has a degree of affinity to the doctrines of necessity, on which account the Author chooses here to declare his dissent from the opinions of the fatalists, and especially from those which question the interposition of Providence, or which suppose the Divinity to predetermine irreversibly his own will. Such pre- determination, he conceives, would be a restraint incompatible with infinite power and goodness, and a belief of this nature is calculated to lessen exertion and our reliance upon Providence. It is not the Author's intention to engage in any subject evidently unsearchable; but to reason on what may be conceived discoverable, which affords a prospect of profit, and which is field large enough to exercise curiosity, or to satisfy ambition. It It is right rather than necessary, that the general reader should be advertised (what the more learned would not otherwise fail to discover) that the work here presented is the fruit of meditation rather than of study, which may have caused, but will not excuse, his deliver- ing sometimes as new, opinions which have been already advanced by other writers. In an attempt like the present, apology must be ineffectual. If the public shall judge his astronomical ideas more worthy to have, been suppressed than to have been submitted to their notice, he must be resigned to their decision. It should be understood that this essay origi- nated in accident, and quite unpremeditatedly. The Author, reflecting on the disposition in the balanced needle to place itself in a North and South direction, was not satisfied with ascribing it wholly to the influence of the magnet. A paper written by him of his conjectures on this subject was read at the last of the summer meetings of the Royal Society. A farther pur- suit of this inquiry led to the contemplation of the motions of the heavenly bodies, and of the manner in which they have been accounted for, and gave rise to the ensuing commentary. A 4 In 8 In treating of the motions of the heavenly bodies, the Universe is generally considered as composed of Space and Matter. Motion is a circumstance to which matter is subject. There is motion which is also a quality in nature, or a property in matter, from which, as will be explained, the most inert matter is not exempt. Motion is defined to be change of place, which indeed is a convertible proposition ; but as rotation is a motion whereby a spherical body can so move, as that the whole shall con- tinue to occupy one and the same place in space, to prevent perplexity, and also as more con- venient for the purpose of this treatise, it is proposed to distinguish motion into two kinds j progressive and rotary. Of locomotive powers inherent in matter, the reciprocal attraction or tendency towards each other of every particle of matter (which we de- nominate gravity) is allowed to be universal ; to be the most regular and independent of acci- dents, and at the same time the most compre- hensible in its effects, and the most incompre- hensible in its cause, of all the powers or quali- ties of motion. It is the source of all other regular motion. Without the influence and interposition interposition of other causes, this sociable dispo- sition in matter would make it seem possible for matter to accumulate into one mass, and for the rest of space to be a void. But matter, that of which our planet is com- posed, consists of many apparently different sub- stances, some of which are endued with active principles not to be repressed, as of vegetation, which may be regarded as the elementary living principle of matter, and others equally powerful, whence arises a circle of tendencies, as to grow, (which is to increase by attraction and assimi- lation of other matter,) to ameliorate or purify (as by insensible fermentation,) to mature, to decay, to corrupt, and from corruption again to join with other substances pursuing the same round *. Supposing therefore all matter accumulated and at rest, these active elements in its composition would naturally produce a renewal of motion. We find matter partly collected in masses, and partly diffused in space; and as there cannot have been a beginning, which our conceptions sufficiently confirm to us, it is most natural to conclude that such has ever been the disposition of * Similar to this in the moral system, our old almanacks instruct us, that war begets poverty, poverty peace, &c. 10 of matter, and that it never did exist in a state of perfect rest. It is also reasonable to believe that the hea- venly bodies which we see, will not endure for ever ; and that they began to exist in their present state at different periods, and in various ways, each with motions originating in the circumstances of its first formation. The pre- vailing opinion respecting the planetary motions is, that they were produced by a projectile im- pulse given ; the motion imparted by which, combining with the motion resulting from the mutual attraction betwixt them and the Sun, makes them revolve in orbits round the Sun. If a body so set in motion travels in void space the projectile force will continue unimpaired. If it travels through space occupied by matter, howsoever thin and weak the matter or medium may be, the projectile force must continually be weakened and diminished till none remains, and it will then be, as to motion, in the same cir- cumstances as if its original formation had been by a gradual accumulation of matter ; that is to say, that it would be quiescent, except in its tendency to gravitate towards other bodies, and the motions consequent thereon. A con- A consequence generally attending progressive or Rotary Motion. motion is rotation, or the turning of a body round an axis of its own. This effect is caused by want of conformity in the shape, or want of uniformity in the density, of the proceeding body, whereby some part or parts offer greater obstruction to the progress than other parts. The adherence of additional matter to the side of a boat advancing through water causes im- pediment to the advance on that side, and if there is not the like impediment on the other, the two sides will advance at unequal rates, which will cause the line of progress to be continually deviating. Inequalities or irregularities less affect the direction of the general progress in a spherical body projected, than in a lengthened body ; but will have increased effect in causing rotary motion. If the repulsive effect of an impediment is not strong enough to cause the body to turn quite round, the body jH*BT only oscillate ; but if strong enough to cause a com- plete revolution, the rotation will necessarily proceed. Two conditions accordingly are re- quired for the progress of a body to produce rotation ; one, that it shall be through a medium which gives resistance ; the other, that the body shall shall not be of an exact uniform shape, and throughout of equal density. A void can have no action on bodies whether at rest or passing through it ; and there appears no cause why a body perfectly spherical and of equal density in all its parts, shall, by the action on it of any medium through which it passes, contract a rotary motion. The heavenly bodies within our solar system, concerning whose shape or qualities we have any knowledge, are constituted, the Sun not excepted, with varieties and in- equalities in their parts, sufficiently visible to us to account for their capability, in this respect-, of acquiring rotary motion. The other con- dition necessary will be remarked on in the sequel. One of the immediate effects of motion on a mass of matter like our Earth is a dispersion of the lighter and loose particles of the surface of the body moved. If the motion is con- tinued, these particles being incessantly fol- lowed by others, (including effluvia and exha- lations,) all that does not gravitate back, diffuses itself. If a body at rest was first set in motion in .space which was otherwise void, this disper- sion from itself might form sufficient medium for the 13 the commencement of a rotary motion. Rotary motion would increase the quantity of matter thrown off, and of course the density of medium, which in its turn would increase the velocity of the rotation, till both corresponded with the velocity of the progress, and the moving body would thus be enveloped with a light medium furnished from itself. In this view I consider Air to be a substance proceeding, and continually supplied, from the body in motion, having been part thereof; that the grosser matter contained in it gravitates back, and the more subtile and fine part ascends ; and that an unremitted continuance of this process, by means of rotary motion, diffuses a thin fluid, and forms the atmospheres by which the Sun and the planets are surrounded. In fur- therance of this view of the origin of air, I con- ceive that if the motions of all the masses of accumulated matter were made to cease, the atmospheres and the fluid matter now floating in space would subside and be collected to the nearest masses ; or if rotation ceased, and pro- gressive motion was continued, all collateral floating substances would be in continual ap- proximation to the masses. That That the rotation of a body round its axis is the cause, or one of the principal causes of a surrounding atmosphere, is strongly corroborated by the circumstance of the Moon, which revolves round its axis only once in a lunation, having so little of atmosphere visible to us that her having any has been disputed. The defect has been attributed by some to a want of moisture in her composition ; but moisture seems a necessary ingredient, if not one indispensably requisite to the adhesion of matter. It seems more probable that it is by the means of an atmosphere that from the moon's enlightened part, the rays of the Sun are so clearly reflected to us ; but that this atmosphere, from the slowness of the moon's rotation, has little activity imparted to it, and does not extend to be visible far from the sur- face of the moon's body. It is sometimes said, in arguing against the possibility of a vacuum, that air fills space. I would prefer to say occupies, not fills, as by its compressibility, it easily makes room for, and in a very small degree resists, the admission of other matter, except when already compressed. It has been made a question whether any other substance is in such perfect contact, or of so continuous 15 continuous a consistence as air. The movement of any part causes sensible movement in the parts contiguous, and a smaU concussion affects to a great distance. That air admits no void has probably been a general belief longer than his- tory can trace. Shakespeare makes one of his characters say, " the very air, but for vacancy, " had gone to gaze on Cleopatra, and made a " gap in nature." The atmosphere of the earth s reckoned to be an heterogeneous mixture of every kind of substance which composes the body of the earth ; certainly of all kinds of effluvia and ex- halation. The qualities of this mixture are extreme elasticity and tenacity, which seems to render it incapable of being separated except by intervenient matter ; compressibility ; extensi- bility or capability of diffusion believed to be illimitable j susceptibility to be disturbed by dif- ference of temperature ; and a promptitude of disposition to regain its equilibrium. The purer essences of matter embodied in air possibly give it this springiness and activity. Thus en- dued, atmosphere seems not so properly an aggre- gation of particles or atoms, as one united and consistent 16 consistent body ; as in liquids, two or more small drops put together will so unite as to become one drop. In assigning a boundary (which has been done) to the atmosphere of the earth, limiting its ex- tension to a certain number of miles, no other meaning can have been intended, than that be- yond that distance the air is too unsubstantial for the support of animal existence, or for effects within our perception. A real, positive, limita- tion at a specified distance no one can have imagined : the most that can be conceived to- wards a void, is a gradual diminution of density of medium as the distance from the body whence it proceeds increases ; and astronomers have so settled the point, in a kind of logarithmic pro- portion, it being admitted that * as the eleva- tion or distance above the surface increases in an arithmetical progression, the density of atmos- phere decreases in a geometrical progression.* The superior air has been described under the name of aether, as a distinct matter from atmos- phere, because more fine and rare ; but this constitutes no essential difference. I esteem their opinion the most orthodox who deny aether as 17 as a specific matter, and think the air capable of diffusing itself through space. Air is mostly fluid, effluvia and exhalation being among the lightest parts of matter; impregnated with essences, but exceedingly diluted from the greater quantity of exhalation purely aqueous. That air is a gravitating sub- stance, is evidently true of part ; but can it be said of that which ascends ? To the ques- tion, What is weight ? I should answer, down- ward pressure. In a thicker or thinner medium, substances will be more or less compressed j and it is the strength of this compression, I conceive, rather than the weight of air, which the quicksilver shows ; and the continual exuda- tion from the earth I imagine contributes no less to density and strength of compression, than pressure from above. A tenacious atmosphere rising from a spherical body in rotation, is naturally drawn into a stream. Dr. Pemberton, in his View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy, speaking of the opinion of Des Cartes, that the planets were kept in their courses by the means of a fluid matter, which conti- nually circulating round carried the planets along with it, remarks, ' that if the whole B ' planetary 18 * planetary region were filled with a fluid matter, ' the Sun by turning round on its axis might * communicate motion first to that part of the 'fluid which was contiguous, and by degrees * propagate the like motion to the parts more * remote *.' If atmosphere is considered as rising from the surface of the body, it has ab initio the motion of the surface ; and by the common effect of adhesion, and more by its peculiar tenacity, a continuance of this parent motion is preserved to it. The lower air is drawn after the surface of the body in rotation, and the upper air is drawn by the lower to which it is a cause of some detention, making of the whole atmosphere at the equatorial parts, a regular cir- culating and circular stream. I have said regular at the equatorial parts, for there the atmosphere rises or is thrown off without obliquity, and in the direction of the plane of the rotary motion, and it may be imagined with greater force than at the parts towards the poles, both on account of the greater velocity of the rotary motion, and the action of a vertical Sun causing increase of evaporation. It has been said of our atmosphere, that by moving * Pemberton, book 2, chap. i. 19 moving continually round with the Earth it has acquired the same degree of motion. With respect to the quantity of motion, this is some- thing beyond the fact. The surface of the Earth is, comparatively with the atmosphere, a fixed, and the atmosphere an adhesive but yield- ing, substance, which follows, not accompanies. It is thus argued, 'The motion of the Earth * being common to all bodies on its surface, and i to the fluids which cover it, their relative mo- ' tions are the same as if the Earth was at rest.' This position is illustrated by a supposition, which I question whether experiment would con- firm ; which is, that ' in a vessel having uniform ' motion, a projectile thrown directly upwards ' falls on the same spot from which it was pro- * jected, and seems to describe a vertical line to * those in the vessel ; but seen from the shore, ' it really describes a parabolic curve.' This is carrying similitude to identity. I will propose a case for consideration. Let a vessel in calm weather and quiet water, be towed at an equable rate, suppose of five miles per hour ; and let a ball be fired from a gun pointed directly to the zenith. The direction given to the ball is from the composition of two impulses, the one vertical, B 2 the 20 the other horizontal, at the rate of the vessel's advance. If during the ascent and descent of the ball the horizontal impulse suffers no abate- ment by the resistance of the air, the ball might return to the gun ; but I apprehend that the ho- rizontal advance communicated to the ball by the motion of the vessel, would almost immedi- ately after being discharged from the gun begin to experience diminution, and that the ball would descend more perpendicularly than it ascended. As I have not heard of any experiment proving the contrary, I think it possible that a plumb line at the equator, would be found on nice exa- mination, to have a measurable quantity of ad- vance eastward at the upper and fixed part. The connection of our atmosphere with the surface of the Earth, is similar to that of the waters of the sea with the coasts and shores of the land, or of the waters of a river with its shores. Points of land which project will interrupt and divert the general course of the stream, and produce eddies, whirlpools, and currents in other directions; but this interruption is limited to the neighbourhood of the shores, whilst the dis- tant main stream pursues its natural direction undisturbed. In the like manner the alternations of 21 of continent and ocean on the surface of the Earth occasion interruptions to the streams of air, which on a clear smooth surface would natu- rally prevail ; and this may take place without disturbing the order of the superior atmosphere. At and near the Equator is found the General Of th Trade Easterly Wind, which we call the General Trade Wind - Wind. It blows regular and constant, with small exception, in the South Sea, where there is a large expanse of surface clear of lands, small islands excepted ; also in the middle of the equa- torial part of the Atlantic the Trade Wind is no less regular and constant. The rotary motion of the Earth carrying the surface continually from West to East, and its greatest velocity being at the equator, the equa- torial stream of atmosphere (where not inter- rupted) is drawn after the Earth's surface in the same direction ; that is to say, from West to East ; but its not keeping pace with the surface, makes the relative current of air experienced in our tropical regions, to be from the East towards the West. The rapid progress of the Earth's surface to the East at the Equator, seems as natural and obvious a cause for producing the General Easterly Wind, as a flag or streamer B 3 carried 22 carried swiftly through the air in a calm would be for producing an effect on the streamer similar and equivalent to a current of the air ; yet this cause seems to have been overlooked or rejected, and another assigned, the effect of which I appre- hend to have been erroneously applied. But be- fore discussing this point, I will just remark, that out of the tropical latitudes, the circles of rotation becoming smaller, ,and the atmosphere rising in oblique direction to the plane of the diurnal motion, more and more as the poles are ap- proached, the velocity and force of the rotary motion is there diminished, and obliquity given to the direction of the superincumbent atmos- phere. Accordingly, the motions of the atmos- phere have not the like regular and orderly direction near or towards the poles, as in the tropical latitudes. It is argued that the Easterly Trade Wind is caused by the temperature, and the alterations to which it is subject, travelling from the East towards the West, occasioned by the Sun passing over the meridians from East to West. The effect of temperature upon the direction of the winds, is most regularly instanced in the Trade Wind being from the Northward of East in 23 in North latitude, and from the Southward of East in South latitude ; in the periodical winds called Monsoons j and in the alternate sea and land breezes near coasts of any considerable ex- tent in the warm latitudes. The argument which has been held respecting the cause of the General Easterly Trade Wind, is, " that where the air is heated and expanded, " as by a vertical Sun, the more cool and dense " air from parts of the atmosphere not so heated, " continually flows in to supply the place of what " the heat throws upward j and as the Sun in " moving from East to West heats the air im- " mediately under him, and thereby expands it, " the air to the Eastward is constantly rushing " towards the West to restore the equilibrium or " natural state of the atmosphere, which occasions " a perpetual East Wind in these (tropical) " limits.*' Here a difficulty is created which controverts the main argument. In the warm latitudes, indeed in every latitude, the general temperature between midnight and noon is cooler than the temperature from noon to midnight. Towards sunrise is a cooler time than any other part of the 24 hours ; and taking equal distances from the meridian over which the Sun is passing, B 4 the m the parts over which the Sun has passed are more heated than those towards which the Sun is travelling, and from which it has been longest absent. If to restore the equilibrium where the air is rarified by heat, the supply is to come from where the air is most cool and dense, the meri- dian where it is early morning should certainly contribute. The greatest rush should be from the unheated West, to meet the Sun, rather than from the heated East. Noon should travel against the Western breeze, and be followed by the Eastern. This, throughout the tropical lati- tudes, would probably be the case, and the cur- rent of the air in the course of every 24 hours, would be, on every meridian, at one time towards the East, and at another towards the West, in the manner of sea and land breezes, if the winds were governed only by the state of the temperature. I find I am not singular in dissenting from the mode in which the General Easterly Trade Wind has been accounted for. Professor Playfair has remarked, " The cause usually assigned for the " Trade Wind is the constant motion toward " the West, of the spot to which the Sun is ver- " tical, and where of course the rarefaction is " greatest. This it is supposed draws along " with 25 *' with it the air from the East. This however, " is by no means a satisfactory explanation*." Dr. Henry Robertson, in his Natural History of the Atmosphere, remarks that the Trade Winds are never so strong during the night as in the day. Something might be learnt on this head by examining a great number of sea journals of navigations through the trade lati- tudes, whether the greater coolness of the hemis- phere westward of the sun causes temporary abatement in the strength of the Trade Wind, which effect might be expected to be most evident towards sun-rise. The motion of the Earth in orbit must undoubtedly affect the at- mosphere ; in what degree or manner I believe has not hitherto been conjectured. The rotation of the Sun was discovered by Galileo many years before Sir Isaac Newton demonstrated the universality of gravity. The consequences resulting from these two causes, the combined reflection of mankind is slowly and gradually developing. Many important truths have been strongly conceived, and some have been adopted by Faith, long before their demonstration .became evident, without which the * Outlines of Natural Philosophy, vol. I. p. 307. the discovery is not compleated. Des Cartes, enlarging upon an opinion first held by Kepler, imagined a system of vortices, as forming the plan of our solar system. This was susceptible of being supported by the discoveries of Galileo and Sir Isaac Newton, but in the infant state of the question, satisfactory demonstration did not unfold itself. Sir Isaac Newton objected to the system of motion communicated by the rotation of the Sun to a fluid element enveloping and carrying with it the planets ; first, * that the ' velocities with which the parts of such a fluid ' would move in different distances from the ' centre of motion, will not agree with the ' motion observed in different planets ; for ' instance that the time of one entire circulation ' of the fluid wherein Jupiter should swim, * would bear a greater proportion to the time of one entire circulation of the fluid in which the * Earth is, than the period of Jupiter bears to the period of the Earth/ Secondly, that the ' planet cannot circulate in such a fluid so as to ' keep in the same course with it, unless the ' planet and the contiguous fluid are of the same * density, and the planet be carried along with * the same motion as the fluid.' And thirdly, that 27 that some vivifying force will be continually * necessary at the centre of motion or attrac- * tion ;' for that otherwise, ' the Sun, by com- * municating motion to the ambient fluid, will lose from itself as much motion as it imparts * to the fluid, unless some acting principle reside ' in the Sun to renew the motion continually *.' A fourth objection stated by Dr. Pemberton is, that ' planets and comets whilst in the same * region or parts of the heavens, are seen to * move with different velocities, and in different * directions ; and if they are both carried round ' by vortices, there must be one direction and * velocity to allow for the motion of planets, and another to account for the motion of ' comets.' He adds, * as this cannot be ex- * plained, either the hypothesis of vortices must be given up, or its advocates must say that it ' is not a single vortex, but several vortices * distinct from each other, that impel these bodies in their course ; and must suppose ' several vortices to be contained in the same ' space mutually penetrating each other.' For these reasons, the system of vortices was thought not to correspond so well with the wus>.,.(u motions * Pemberton's View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy, p. 167-8. 28 motions of the heavenly bodies as projectile force combined with gravity or attraction. Respecting the first objection j if the velocity of Jupiter in his orbit is not in the same pro- portion to distance from the Sun as that of the other planets, it is to be regarded as anomalous to the general order of the solar system. There are many cases in astronomy that appear to us not to correspond with principles which are evi- dently just, and of which we are so well con- vinced that although the fact disappoints us, we do not nevertheless distrust the principle, but reasonably content ourselves with acknowledg- ing an undiscovered cause. The attraction of the Sun on the planets is allowed to be as much on the secondary (the satellites) as on the pri- mary at the same distances ; and Pemberton remarks that 'the secondary being sometimes nearer to the Sun than the primary, and some- times more remote, they are not at those times * acted upon in the same degree with their pri- mary ; but when nearer the Sun are attracted ' more, and when farther distant are attracted ' less, whence arise various inequalities in the motion of the secondary planets.' This rea- soning no one will dispute ; yet the result of observation does not correspond with it so well as 29 as might have been expected. The body nearest to the Sun being most attracted, is a cause why the Earth and Moon should be more apart at the times of the full and of the new moon, than at any other time of the moon's revolution ; but such is not the case. Also, from the full moon to the time of new- moon, the effect of the attraction of the Sun must be supposed to acce- lerate the motion of the moon in orbit; and from the new moon to the full to retard ; never- theless we find the moon is frequently a longer time in performing the half revolution from the full to the new than in performing the other half. It is said, * the moon goes round the earth in an * elliptic orbit, and therefore in every lunar ' month she approaches nearer to the Earth than ' her mean distance, and recedes farther from it. * When she is nearest, she attracts strongest and * so raises the tides most. The contrary hap- * pens when she is farthest*.' The common and well known fact is that the greatest or spring tides constantly fall out at, or imme- diately after, the full moon and new moon j but the nearest approach of the moon to the Earth, and its farthest recession, does not hap- pen at constant fixed times of the lunar revolu- tion, * Encyclopedia Britannica. 30 tion, but at times continually varying. The satellites however, constituting the inferior link of a chain of dependencies to the origin of which we cannot penetrate, are more subject to intri- cacies of movement than the other heavenly bodies. The difference or discordance of Jupiter's re- volution in orbit from the general order observ- able in the motions of the planets, or from the law laid down by Kepler, that the squares of the times of revolution are in the proportion of the cubes of the mean distances from the Sun, will be found by the following table of the periods of revolution and distances, to be less than the remark above cited from Pemberton may give reason to expect : p sriods of Revolution Years, Days, Hours. in Distance from the Sun in Miles. Mercury - > a>) O. 87. 23. ;ii i 36,000,000. Venus - ,n g t 0. 224. - - 68,000,000. The Earth ^ - 1. 0. 0. eTfo 4 "; 95> 000 > 000 - Mars - - . - 1. 321. 23. - - 144,000,000. Vesta- - - - 3- 240. 0. - - 225,000,000. Juno - - - - 4- 91. 9- - - 253,000,000. Ceres - - .-M 4- 213. 0. - - 253,000,000. Pallas - - - 4. 213. 0. - - 263,000,000. Jupiter - ... . 11. 315. 0. - - 495,000,000. Saturn - - - 29. 183. 0. - - 900,000,000. Georgium Sidus, 83. 183. o. - 1,800,000,000. ^*o:i '' On 31 On the subject of the second objection there is occasion to speak at some length. It is not to be imagined that the density of the Earth or other planet does not much exceed the density of the fluid by which they are severally surrounded, and however the force of the Sun's attraction is weakened by distance, it continues to act in pro- portion to density. The hypothesis of progres- sive motion being communicated to the planets by projectile impulse, which combining with the attraction of the Sun causes the planets to revolve in a circular orbit round the Sun, supposes a medium so rare as not to offer a sensible resist- ance, nor to occasion a sensible diminution of the force of the original impulse given. And doubtless, a medium may be imagined so rare, that a projectile force acting in it, shall endure till the body projected falls into decay. By projectile force is understood, an impulse proceeding from no known general cause, not continued nor renewed after being communi- cated. One author remarks, as matter is of itself inactive, and as the planets are solid bodies, it is reasonable to conclude that a propelling force was given to them.* It is explained by M. le Comte * Lectures on Astronomy. By W. Phillips, p. 32. London. 1817. 32 Comte de la Place, in the following manner : * Un point en repos ne pent se donner aucun ' mouvement, puisqu'il ne renferme pas en soi, de * raison pour se mouvoir dans un sens plutot que ' dans un autre. Lorsqu'il est sollicite par une 'force quelconque, etensuite abandonne a lui-meme, ' il se meut constamment d'une maniere uniforme ' dans la direction de cette force, s'il n'eprouve ' aucune resistance ; c'est a dire, qu y a chaque in- ( stant sa force et la direction de son mowvement sont les memes" * From the above, as well as from what is said in Maclaurin and Pemberton on the laws of projectiles, we are led to conceive a projectile impulse in the nature of event ; yet if we see a r number of events of exactly the same kind, occur in one peculiar manner, without a single instance appearing of opposite tendency, we are led to seek a cause in some general principle. In this view, the supposition of such a perfect coincidence as is found in the motions of all the bodies of the solar system being commu- nicated by means of a projectile force which immediately abandons the body projected, is far from satisfactory, as the mechanical effect of a single * Exposition du Systems du Monde. Liv. Ill, ch. 2. S3 single impulse cannot be demonstrated to be sufficient for the purpose. In investigating the laws of Nature and of Creation, we properly, indeed by necessity, refer to supernatural agency those matters which demonstrably could not happen by means we esteem natural, or which are evidently beyond the -reach of the mental attainments of mankind to conceive. The existence of matter, its pro- perties, that especially of gravity, which may be called the primum mobile, are of this superior class. What can be traced, or can be conceived to flow, from those original sources, it may be allowed to us to assume as the course of Nature. Gravity is considered as direct or rectilinear attraction, and from its acknowledged univer- sality is inferred, that all the heavenly bodies are in progressive motion. M. de la Place ob- serves, " Toutes les etoiles en vertu de la pesan- " teur universelle doivent graviter les unes vers " les autres*." The action and influence of two bodies on each other, supposing them to be so distant from all other bodies as not to be sensibly affected by them, we may conjecture would be, that by the direct attraction of gravity C they * Systeme du Monde, Liv. IV. ch. 16. 34 they would at first advance in the shortest line towards contact; but in their progress, they might each acquire rotation and become pro- vided with atmosphere. The atmospheres, emanating from themselves and by the rotation, would be each with respect to the orb whence it proceeded, an ascending and circulating stream ; by the former of which qualities, they would be repellents, mutually opposing nearer approach ; and by the latter, each orb would be involved in the vortex of the other, and their future progress would be in orbits. If they were of equal magnitude and their rotative motion in accordance, they would pursue the same path always opposed to each other. If they were of unequal magnitude, the smaller would move in the larger orbit. The mutual and reciprocal attraction of many bodies whose positions and distances from each other are continually varying, must occasion pro- gressions through space continually varying in direction, and infinitely complicated. Such, in fact, must be conceived universally the condition of the motion of all the heavenly bodies. If any one could be between attractions so equally balancing as to retain it in some one place, such a situation 35 a situation could be but of short continuance, unless the rest also were stationary. Kepler was the first who supposed the planets were caused to revolve round the Sun by means of the Sun's atmosphere. I have copied the fol- lowing account of his discoveries and opinions respecting the motion of the Sun and the planets from M. de la Place's Systeme du Monde: " Apres " avoir determine la courbe que les plane tes decri- " ventautour du Soleil, et decouvert les lots de leur " mouvemens ; Kepler etait trop pres du principe " dont ces lots derivent, pour ne pas le pressentir. " La recherche de ce principe exerga souvent son " imagination active ; Kepler supposait au Soleil " un mouvement de rotation sur un axe perpendi- " culaire d Vecliptique : des especes immaterielks " emanees de cet astre dans le plan de son equateur, " donees d'une activite decroissante en raison de " distances, et conservant leur mouvement primitif " de revolution, faisaient participer chaque planete, " a ce mouvement circulaire. En meme temps, la " planete par une sor'te d 9 instinct ou de magne- " tisme, s'approchait et s'eloignait alternativement " du Soleil, s'elevait au dessus de V equateur solaire, " et s'abaissait au dessous, de maniere a decrire " une ellipse toujours situee dans un meme plan c 2 "passant 36 " passant par le centre du Soleil. " * This was ad- mirably and comprehensively conceived, and is the basis of the system of vortices afterwards advanced by Descartes. If in addition, Kepler had inferred the progressive motion of the Sun from its rotary motion, it is probable that his system would have prevailed from that time to the present, in preference to every other. Kep- ler's hypothesis was however esteemed visionary and was neglected, until revived by Descartes, with the addition of attributing to each of the planets a distinct and separate vortex. Repetitions cannot well be avoided in argu- ment, which the author must hope will be admitted * " After having determined the curve which the planets " describe round the Sun, and discovered the laws of their " motions, Kepler approached too near to the principle whence " these laws were derived, not to acquire some insight into it. " Attempts to discover this principle often exercised his active " imagination. Kepler supposed the Sun to have a rotary " motion round an axis perpendicular to the ecliptic; that *' ethereal particles (des especes immatericlles) emanated from " this star in the plane of its equator, endued with an activity " decreasing in a proportion to [increase of] the distances, and " preserving their primitive movement of revolution, made " each of the planets participate in this circular motion. At " the same time, the planet by a kind of instinct or magnetism, " alternately approached to, and receded from, the Sun, ascended " above the solar equator and declined below, so as to describe " an ellipse always situate in the same plane, passing through " the centre of the Sun." 37 admitted as their excuse. Air, capable of com- pression but prone to expansion, the lighter will not gravitate or descend in space occupied by medium more dense ; and the whole is continually impelled upward by fresh emanations. It is obvious that matter proceeding continually from a body, of which only a part gravitates back, must cause its continual impoverishment and diminution, unless it receives supplies. Concerning this I shall speak hereafter. In supposing the equatorial stream of the Sun's atmosphere to carry the planets and their atmospheres round the Sun, and to diffuse itself to the remote parts of the system, that is to say, till it arrives at space where it mixes with ele- ment under the influence of other stars, the ascending of the stream must act to the sustain- ment of the planets within that range against the power of gravity ; towards which end the atmospheres of the planets assist by their con- nection, tenacity, and being largely extended, which last mentioned particular acts as an expan- sion (equal to a diminution) of the planet's density. The effect of this in rendering theplanets buoyant in the solar fluid must appear great, if it is believed that the moon is carried round in its orbit by the atmosphere of the Earth. c 3 That 58 That the atmosphere of the Sun and the atmospheres of the planets may mutually pene- trate each other, appears possible from what is experienced in the seas of our Earth where cur- rents which have different directions meet. In many instances they coalesce, or neutralize each other ; but there are instances of currents mutu- ally penetrating through each other, and after crossing, continuing each in its original direction undisturbed. The capability of fluids to pene- trate and expand in each other is well evinced by the visible effect which a single drop of red wine has on a comparatively large quantity of water. Effluvia will pervade and be diffused against a moderate stream of air, which however gradually abates its progress. Chymists I doubt not can furnish much better illustrations of the fact. Another material effect which seems attri- butable to the ascending of the solar atmosphere, is the rotation of the planets. It has been remark- ed that progressive motion through a medium is requisite for the production of rotary motion. An inert and quiescent body floating in a me- dium, cannot be supposed thereby to acquire rotary motion. But the planets are not qui- escent in the solar stream, inasmuch as their greater gravity than the fluid makes them resist being being carried to a greater distance from the Sun, whilst the ascending of the fluid resists their nearer approach to the Sun. The constant ascension of the solar stream is to the planets equivalent to, in fact is, so much progress through a resisting medium. In seaman's phrase, the planets by their gravity maintaining their ground against the ascending of the solar fluid, is similar to a vessel stemming the tide. To attribute the rotation of the planets, and their being sustained against the power of gravity, to the ascending of the solar fluid, seems allow- ing great effect to extremely light means. It has been remarked that the Sun's attraction at those distances is extremely light ; it is also to be remarked that the rotations of the planets are extremely gentle if compared with the rapidity of their progress in orbit. The Earth, for example, travels in orbit more than sixty times the measure of her own circumference to each time that she revolves round her own axis. Whence must be concluded that the rotary motion is produced by the most mild means, consonant to the old and established maxim, that Nature performs all her functions in the least difficult manner. c 4 It 40 It may be conceived that the planets are a greater weight upon the rotation of the Sun, than equal magnitudes of the solar fluid at the same distances, and that therefore they maybe a longer time in performing a revolution round the Sun than the fluid ; which, by the gliding of the fluid past the planet, might contribute to rotation of the planet. But against this supposition it occurs, that if the solar fluid circulated faster than the planet it would have a tendency towards causing rotation from East to West, the fluid being most dense on the inferior side of the planet. Another small circumstance to notice is, that the rays of the Sun are believed to be material ; which, if true, and they are not merely corruscations fol- lowing in rapid succession, but have more than an instant of existence, they may by the rotation of the Sun, communicate a degree of lateral pressure on bodies in their way and by which they are broken ; and thereby give a small progressive, impulse in the direction of a tangent to the arc which the striking part of the ray was describing. But these are minute considerations. From a comparison of observations made in times past, with the observations of the present time, it is believed that the Sun and the whole of our 41 our solar system are gravitating towards the constellation of Hercules. * To ascertain this point with certainty, will probably require a long series of observations ; but that the Sun has pro- gressive motion may be regarded as proved by its having rotation round an axis of its own. Arguing on the belief that matter is always the same in quantity, that what is at any time dis- persed from masses is diffiised in other parts of space, and that the Sun is in progress always through space new to it, much of the medium nearest to the line of progress must continually be drawn into the Sun's atmosphere, and that which gravitates most, becomes part of the Sun. It has been conjectured that small masses, and sometimes even comets or wandering stars, fall into the Sun and help to its recruit. According as the expenditure from the Sun, or other orb, exceeds, or is less than, the supply, the orb must diminish or increase ; and it is to be imagined that every orb in the firmament is liable to in- crease or decrease. The belief of the Sun having progressive motion does not appear to have been entertained till long after its rotary motion was discovered. It has of late * La Place. Lav. IV. ch. 16. 42 late so much gained ground, that astronomers have conjectured an orbit of the Sun round a more powerful centre of motion; and some have not scrupled to say, * round the centre of gravity of the whole universe,' which seems travelling far ; but is the contrary, for every point of in- finite space is as exactly its centre as any other point ; which Pascal has happily expressed, in describing the illimitableness of space, * whose centre,' he says, * is every where, and whose cir- cumference is no where.' The Sun is one of innumerable stars visible to us, among which, it is reasonable to suppose, are many similar, in being each the centre of a system of minor stars or planets j but we have no ground for conjecturing of any particular star, that it is of greater or less magnitude than the Sun. In either case the course of the Sun's progres- sion will be determined by the predominance of the attractions. Revolution in orbit of one body round another proceeds from a superiority which commands it. If the Sun was under the influence of such a controlling power, it seems probable that some symptom or indication of it would be apparent to us, but no such indication has been discovered ; nor is there reason to suppose revo- lution 43 lution round a central attraction to be universally of necessity, whilst progressive motion appears to be universally inevitable. It may be argued, that if the Sun does not move in orbit round a central attraction, but is moved by attractions continually varying, its motion cannot be uniform ; and every variation in its motion must cause variation in the whole solar system. Without supposing eternal exist- ence to the Sun, this is to be supposed the case. In such (to our apprehensions) immense distances it may require centuries to produce small per- ceptible variations. If orbicular motion round a central attraction can be supposed universally of necessity, it may also be supposed that the central attraction of the Sun performs revolution round a still greater, and that round another, ad. wfinitum.. The planets and comets, it is remarked, whilst in the same parts of the heavens, move with dif- ferent velocities and in different directions. Those called the regular planets have permanent situation in the equatorial regions of the system, where their motions are governed by the regular stream of the solar atmosphere. Comets are mostly bodies of the higher latitudes. As in the extra 44 extra tropical latitudes of the Earth, the Earth's atmosphere appears not to be under any certain regular direction, so in the higher latitudes of the solar space the rotation of the Sun does not act with the same strength as in the equatorial parts, and may be supposed not to give there the constancy of direction necessary to preserve one regular course of the medium. A comet or planet of the polar regions of the system, if carried by a temporary stream towards the Sun, would be aided in descent by an increasing force of gravity, and by degrees contract that velocity of progress with which we see those bodies ap- proach the Sun, and cross the equatorial stream. Some comets have exhibited much the appear- ance of being planets in a state of dissolution and dispersion. It has been conjectured, that the moon has been an extra tropical planet, which, coming within the equatorial vortex of the atmos- phere of the Earth, has been detained in its service. This does not oppose M. de la Place's opinion, that none of the regular planets have ever been comets. The moon I apprehend to be a much less perfect orb than the earth ; and the great eccentricity observable in the orbits of comets, appears to me a symptom of decadence. Where 45 Where the plane of rotary motion coincides, or nearly coincides with the progressive direction, it seems favourable for collecting back to the revolving body the weightier parts of the atmos- phere which rises from it. A body not well balanced, may, by the preponderance of density at some one part, have the axis of its rotary motion to coincide with the lirie of its progress. Such possibly is the case with some of the comets. It will assist investigation to compare the two systems, that of revolution in orbit being pro- duced by rotation of a superior, and that of its resulting from the application of a projectile force restrained by gravity. Some of the most important phenomena may be found consistent with either ; and principally that of the planet being retained by the power of gravity, whether from being carried off by a projectile velocity, or by the ascending of the solar atmosphere. It is however most to the purpose to examine cir- cumstances, for such there are, which will not accord indifferently with either system. The laws of elliptic motion are better un- derstood than the causes why the planets and satellites move in elliptical orbits ; and astro- nomers are obliged to acknowledge that ' elliptic motion 46 motion will not exactly coincide with modern observation.' I will suppose for a moment (what seems to have been once a general opinion, but which it would now be deemed absurd to believe), that the Sun was stationary and at rest, except in its rotative motion, and that its rotation proceeded from some property inherent in itself, or from the application of a force appointed and limited to that purpose. Let it at the same time be sup- posed, that there was but one planet revolving round the Sun. Whether the planet was moved by a projectile impulse uniformly and exactly balanced by the force of gravity, or was carried round in the vortex of the Sun's atmosphere at a distance determined by its density, it is to be supposed that the planet would describe an orbit exactly circular, the causes of motion being uni- form. As the case really is, there are many well understood circumstances in the varying positions of the planets from each other, and in the motions of their satellites, to cause what astronomers call perturbations in the courses of the planets, which perturbations are small irregularities of motion. But I apprehend the great and regular cause of the elliptic orbits of the 4? the planets to be the progressive motion of the Sun. The Sun, drawn itself by some powerful attraction, draws after it a train of attendant orbs, linked in a chain of dependencies, which revolve in orbits in subordinate order. In all these revolutions, the secondary (that is to say, the planet with respect to the Sun, or the satellite with respect to the planet), is at one time in advance, and at another time in the rear, of its primary : in the most rapid part of its progress through space it is most a weight, possibly some drawback, upon the progress of its primary, and in its retrogradation it wants not assistance. When it is in advance of its superior, its superior presses towards it ; and the contrary when in the opposite part of its orbit. The secondary is thus made to partake of the progressive move- ment of its primary, and carried round in orbit, by an alternate increase and relaxation of the force applied, whence may arise the periodical accelerations and retardations, as likewise the alternate approximations and recessions, observed to be regular in the motions of the planets, and less regularly periodical in the motions of the satellites. The radius vector is an imaginary strait line from from the centre of the Sun to the centre of a planet. As the planet revolves in its orbit, the radius vector passes over areas of the space within the orbit, forming sectors comprehended between the radii and the arc of orbit described by the planet. The orbits of the planets hav- ing eccentricity, the radius vector is not always of the same length ; but it has been discovered that the areas described by it are equal in equal times, or proportional to the times in which they are described. Accordingly in an uniform equal velocity of the planet, the receding of the planet from the Sun must cause an apparent retardation of progress in orbit, that is to say, a diminution of angular advance ; but it is found that the receding of the Earth from the Sun is attended with a real diminution of velo- city, and of advance in orbit ; and that on re- approaching the Sun, the Earth recovers its velocity to what it had been before. The half revolution of the Earth in orbit from the vernal to the autumnal equinox, occupies seven days and sixteen hours more time than the half revolution from the autumnal to the vernal ; which is a greater retardation and ac- celeration than the difference of distance from the the Sun will account for. As this is a point of importance, it is worth entering into more particularly. The greatest distance of the Earth from the Sun in the course of her revolution is about 96,500,000 miles, ancf the daily apparent or angular progress of the Earth in orbit when at that distance, is 57' 11", which reckoned as an arc of a circle of 96,500,000 miles radius, will give the absolute diurnal progress then, 1,606,000 miles. The least distance of the Earth from the Sun in the course of a revolution, is 93J millions of miles, and the angular diurnal progress of the Earth is then 1 I' 12", which reckoned as an arc of a circle of 93 millions of miles radius, gives absolute daily progress 1,665,000 miles. Here is a difference of nearly 60,000 miles that the daily progress of the Earth in orbit is greater at one part of its revolution round the Sun than at another. A real increase and decrease of velocity * does not, on mecha- nical principles, correspond with motion com- municated by a projectile impulse. The in- crease or diminution of the force of gravity, by approach * Ily a un ralentissement reel dans le mouvement de cet astrc (le soldi) lorsqu'il s'eloigne de la terre. De la Place. 1.15. D 50 approach towards, or by recess from, the centre of gravity, affects only in the vertical direction, and has no connection with the increase or de- crease of the projectile velocity. A propelling impulse which is not continued, cannot cause alternation of velocity j and once abated, it can- not of itself recover. On the other hand, re- tardation of progress in orbit as a consequence of receding from the Sun, and acceleration as a consequence of approach, are effects which cor- respond with the hypothesis of the planets being carried in the vortex or circulating stream of the Sun's atmosphere. For the Sun, or the Earth, turning on its axis, and atmosphere continually rising from the sur- face, is wrapped in a constant succession of fresh atmosphere, drawing after it the old, which is constantly in ascension and elongation. Hence it is that the planets are longer in per- forming a revolution round the Sun in a propor- tion as they are more distant ; and hence any planet receding from the Sun experiences a diminution of progress, and the contrary on re-approaching. That the circulation of the ethereal solar fluid is more slow as the distance from the Sun is greater, may be exemplified by the 51 the gyration of any fluid, and the reader may observe it accords with the preceding table of distances and times of revolution, the circum- ferences of the orbits being in like proportion to each other as the distances from the Sun. Much of effect similar to what is caused by the Sun on the planets, is caused by the planets on their satellites. If the satellites had moved in as regular order as the planets, it being known that the moon at her last quarter is in advance of the Earth, by some similar adaptation, ground for estimating when the Earth was in advance of the Sun might have been obtained ; that is to say, towards what part of the heavens the Sun is advancing. A projectile and instantaneous impulse, which after being once imparted leaves the projected body to itself, it has been shown, is treated by astronomers as an adventitious cause of motion. The similarity of movement in all the planets of the solar system is however very differently re- garded by M. le Comte de la Place, who remarks; " On est etonne de voir toutes les planetes se " mouvoir autour du Soleil, d'occident en orient, " et presque dans le meme plan j les satellites " en mouvement autour de leur planetes, dans le D 2 " meme 52 " meme sens, &c. Un phenomene aussi extra^ " ordinaire n'est point PefFet du hazard ; il " indique tme cause generale qui a determine " tous ces mouvemens." And afterwards, " quelle que soit sa nature, puisqu'elk aproduitou " dirigi lesmouvemens des planetes, ilfaut qu'elle " ait embrasse tous ces corps - 9 et vu la distance " prodigieuse qui les separe, elle ne pent avoir " etc qu'un Jluide d'une immense etendue. Pour " leur avoir donne dans le meme sens, un mouve- " ment presque circulaire autour du Soleil, iljaut " que ce Jluide ait environni cet astre comme une " atmosphere. La consideration des mouvemens pla- " netaires nous conduit done a penser qu'en vertu " d'une chaleur excessive, I' atmosphere du Soleil " s'est primitivement- ttendue au dela des orbes " de toutes les planetes, et quelle s'est resserree " successivement, jusqu'a ses limites dctuelles." i. e. " We are astonished to see all the planets " move round the Sun, from West to East, and " almost in the same plane ; the satellites in '* movement round their planets, in the same " order, &c. A phenomenon so extraordinary '* is not the effect of chance ; it indicates a " general cause, which has determined all these ** motions." And afterwards, " whatsoever is its 53 " its nature, since it has produced or directed the " movements of the planets, it must have em- " braced all those bodies ; and seeing the prodi- " gious distance which separates them, it cannot " be other than a fluid of an immense extent. " To have given them in the same order, a " movement nearly circular round the Sun, this " fluid must have environed this star (the Sun) " as an atmosphere. The consideration of the " planetary movements conducts us then to " think, that in consequence of an excessive heat, " the atmosphere of the Sun primitively extended " itself beyond the orbs of all the planets, and " that it was afterwards gradually contracted to " within its actual limits." * It is remarkable in the above quotation, that M. de la Place has entered as largely into the hypothesis of the extension of the Sun's atmos- phere as Kepler and Descartes j and also that he has supposed it to have been afterwards con- tracted within its original limits. I will briefly sum up the whole argument. Admitting duration to matter and that cir- cumstance^ occasions no absolute exhaustion; admitting * Exposition du Systeme du Monde. Liv. V. ch. 6. Vol. II. p. 420. 425. admitting also the power of gravity to be uni- versal; all else appears to follow consecutively. Gravity causes progression. Progression causes rotation. Whilst progression and rotation dis- perse and circulate, gravity or attraction collects. Herein is the vivifying power which supports and continues the action of the Sun. The Sun communicates motion in consequence of having received it ; and these principles seem calcu- lated to preserve matter in perpetual action of interchange. M. de la Place has noticed a conjecture made by M. Buffon respecting the formation of our planetary system. M. Buffon supposed that a comet fell upon the Sun and drove thence a tor- rent of matter, which when arrived at a distance, formed new junctions in a number of separate orbs. Not very dissimilar to this is a conjecture which has recently been made respecting the four small planets discovered between the orbits of Jupiter and Mars ; i. e. that they had been parts of one and the same planet, and came to their present form by convulsive separation. A mass of matter so broken would probably be dispersed in almost every direction, and in parts of various sizes. The impulses given by the ex- plosion plosion would gradually diminish, and the parts that were too heavy to be sustained in that alti- tude of the solar fluid, would gravitate towards the Sun. If any of the parts were large enough to acquire, by rotation in the descent, atmosphere adequate to rendering them buoyant, their farther descent would be impeded or stopped, and they would be carried in the solar stream, and so be made to perform revolutions in orbit. Or if any of the smaller parts in gravitating towards the Sun, came within the influence of some other mass, whose nearer attraction acted on it more power- fully, they would join that mass, or revolve round it as a satellite. It seems quite open to conjecture, of the orbs in the firmament, that some have received their present form by the disruption of larger masses, and that some have acquired it by gradual accu- mulation. It may be remarked as within our own observation, that in a perturbed state of our atmosphere, the earthy and metallic particles of matter which are floating in the air, being moved by variable streams, have then greater opportu- nities of attracting and joining each other, than in times when the streams of air flow more regu- larly and quiet. Such collections, being of in- flammable 56 flammable nature, if struck by some electric power, may be made to undergo an instantaneous and more powerful fusion than can be given by human art j and by the shock and their more collected weight, be made to descend. In the superior air or medium, matter may be supposed to collect more gradually, to be less subject to disturbance, and thus be allowed to attain to the state of an infant planet. The planets discovered since the commence- ment of the present century evince how small a mass of collected matter is capable of re- volving in a regular orbit round the Sun ; one of those planets being reckoned not to exceed 100 miles in diameter. There does not appear any demonstrable objection why the stones we denominate meteoric, may not either be formed in our own atmosphere, or be part of the wreck of some other mass. There is infinite room for fancy in imagining comparisons between our Earth and the other planets, as habitable bodies. The size and weight of a man of the Sun has been calculated, the cal- culator meaning the Sun to have a race of beings in form like his own fellow-creatures. Some, however, conjecture the planets to be variously peopled, 57 peopled, each with beings whose form, organ- ization, powers and attributes, are peculiarly adapted to itself. And seeing that man, which is the most perfect being of this Earth, is yet too imperfect to be with much show of reason supposed of the first order of beings in the whole solar system, the conjecture appears natural. The argument goes on to show why the Earth is not to be esteemed either the most desirable or the least desirable planet of the solar system ; for as there are planets larger, and some smaller, some nearer the Sun and some more distant, some constituted of matter more dense and solid, and some of matter more rare ; there seems reason for considering our Earth among the planets, as one of average value. The orb we inhabit, from geological appear- ances, has been conjectured to have undergone great changes before the present race of man- kind had arrived at the knowledge of making records which should be intelligible to their pos- terity. That mankind have been some thousand years in a progress, though slow and uncertain, of improvement, can be shown or argued, in numberless instances ; but this would seem wide of the present subject. The Earth itself, I esteem to be in a progress of physical improve- E ment, 5$ ment, of which I regard as an indication, that the plane of the Earth's rotation or diurnal motion is gradually becoming less oblique to the plane of her motion in orbit ; the effect of which will be to lessen the inequality of the seasons. It may be regarded as another indi- cation, that the excentricity of the Earth's orbit is diminishing. If this had been discovered in the lifetime of Fontenelle, he would probably have made it an argument in favour of mankind becoming more rational. Many are glad to join in the opinion, that the Sun is not a globe of fire, from unwillingness to believe that a mass containing so large a portion of the matter of the whole system, shall not be habitable and inhabited. That belief is strength- ened by heat and fire being produced many ways besides being received from the Sun. The strong light we receive from the Sun may pro- ceed from the density and richness of the Sun's atmosphere ; and possibly, attrition of the Sun's rays with the surface of the earth in its rotation, may be as great a cause of the heat we experi- ence from the Sun, as the quality of the rays. By inadvertence we sometimes call an hypo- thesis of the motions of the heavenly bodies, a system of the Universe. But as the whole of our view 59 view of space, (vast as it seems to the generality of our conceptions,) we must be sensible is not equal to the smallest fractional part capable of being expressed by figures, of the Universe, it is not amiss to conceive, that there may exist in space matter and properties, of which we are not capable of entertaining any idea. Our rea- soning by analogy, therefore, should not be supposed to comprehend the Universe. Finally, it should not escape our notice, that the orderly arrangement observable in the system of our Sun has been contrived for the benefit of conscious existence j and from all that we can understand of the government of the heavenly bodies, we find cause to believe, that a perfect justice prevails through all nature. It is no departure from the strict line of justice, that benefit is conferred without having been merited, where Almighty power has so much to bestow ; and when, in the course of human events, we see unmerited misery, or triumphant iniquity, it is to be regarded as a small part of a large running account. I will only add, that I entered on the fore- going enquiry without bias or prepossession in favour of any particular system of the heavenly motions j but was moved thereto by objections which UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. Form L9-50m-4,'61(B899484)444 London : Printed by Luke Hansard & Sons, near LincolnVInn Field*. B 361 Burney - 893c Commentary on the systems which have been ad- vanced for explaining motions 361 B93c