■s* 

 
 to* 
 
 A SKETCH OF THE LIFE AND CHARACTER OF 
 
 WILLIAM PITT, EARL OF CHATHAM, 
 
 AND MEMOIRS OF CERTAIN OTHER DISTINGUISHED INDIVIDUALS ; 
 
 WITH 
 
 ■ * 
 
 REFLECTIONS HISTORICAL, PERSONAL, AND POLITICAL, 
 RELATING TO THE AFFAIRS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND AMERICA, 
 FROM 1763 to 1785. 
 
 I 
 
 By BENJAMIN WATERHOUSE, m. d., 
 
 MEMBER OF SEVERAL MEDICAL, PHILOSOPHICAL. AND LITERARY SOCIETIES 
 IN EUROPE AND AMERICA. 
 
 As to the Book itself, it can say this in its behalf, that it does not merely confine itself 
 | to what its title promises, but expatiates freely into whatever is collateral. 
 
 Harris's Hermes. 
 
 ) 
 
 4 
 
 BOSTON: 
 
 GRAY AND B O WEN 
 1831. 
 
 it 

 
 fc 
 
 ISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, TO WIT. 
 
 District Clerk's Office. 
 
 Be it remembered, that on the seventh day of March, A. D. 183], in the fifty- fifth year of 
 the Independence of the United States of America, Gray & Bowen, of the said district, 
 have deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof they claim as proprie- 
 tors, in the words following, to wit — .- 
 
 "An Essay on Junius and his Letters; embiacing a Sketch of the Life and Character of 
 William Pitt, Earl of Chatham, and Memoirs of certain other Distinguished Individuals: with 
 Beflections Historical, Personal, and Political, relating to the Aifairs of Great Biilain and 
 America, from J 763 to J7S5. By Benjamin Waterhouse, M. D., Alemher of several Med- 
 ical, Philosophican^and Literary Societies in Europe and America. ' As to the Book 
 itself, it can say this in its behalf, that it does not merely confine itself to what its title promi- 
 ses, but expatiates freely into whatever is collateral.' Hurris's Hermes." 
 
 lu conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, entitled " An act fur the en- 
 couragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors 
 and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned " ; and also to an act. 
 entitled " An act supplementary to an act, entitled, ' An act for the encouragement of learning, 
 by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books to the authors and proprietors of such copies, 
 during the times therein mentioned,' and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designin", 
 engraving, and etching historical and other prints." 
 
 JNO. W. DAVIS, 
 Clerk of the District of Massachusetts* 
 
 
 CAMBRIDGE : 
 PRINTED BY E. W. METCALF AND COMPANY. 
 
 i 
 
 w 
 
 i 
 
 
 4 
 
 I
 
 LIBRARY 
 UNIVERSITY CF CALIFOJ 
 
 SANTA BARBARA 
 
 > 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 We make books in America as we made our men-of-war, — 
 one man contrived and executed, what employed several in 
 the ship-yards of Europe. If our ships be as good as the 
 French and English, we do as well as they with less means. 
 The time has been when one man procured the timber from 
 our forests, "planned and superintended the building of the 
 ship even to its rigging, obtained and placed on board the 
 warlike equipments and stores, collected the crew, and then 
 commanded the very ship he had created, and came off con- 
 queror, — necessity thus generating ambidexterity. So with 
 our literary productions, we have less aid, and fewer helps, 
 than they in the capital cities of the old world, where libraries 
 and learned men abound, with oral information on every 
 side. If we in these ends of the earth labor under these 
 disadvantages, our work should be judged of accordingly. 
 We have no guide but Truth, nor other ambition than to be 
 thought to follow her. 
 
 We have taken hold of a gnarled question. Should we, 
 like others, fail to maintain our long conceived hypothesis 
 of the authorship of Junius, we trust that our book will be 
 found, nevertheless, to contain political and moral principles, 
 and a spirit of rational liberty, worthy an American.
 
 m 
 
 IV PREFACE. 
 
 This essay is a new attempt to disentangle the most impor- 
 tant and artfully contrived secret of modern times, the devel- 
 lopement of which will open curious matter for speculation. 
 It has already exercised the wits of the first men of the age ; 
 until conjecture has heen wearied and fallen asleep. 
 
 The British reader may well ask — Who and what are you, p 
 who thus undertake to solve the greatest secret in our his- 
 tory ? — you, born and dwelling in a far distant region of the 
 globe, which was unknown to the world four hundred years ago, 
 and where, little more than two hundred years since, an English 
 word had never been uttered. Is it likely that a native of 
 the new-found quarter of the globe should untie a knot after 
 all our efforts have failed ; and unravel a snarl, the disen- 
 tanglement of which we on the spot have given up in despair ? 
 I reply to such in the words of their great light and orna- 
 ment, their polar-star and ours, Lord Bacon. " Since a 
 man who stands a little removed from a spot of ground, may 
 often survey it better than those who are upon it, 'tis not im- 
 possible but that as a spectator, I may have observed some 
 things which the actors themselves have not." * Still, how- 
 ever, when a man offers a book of this sort to the attention 
 of a discerning public, they ought to know not only who the 
 author is, but what he is ; whether he has ever been in the 
 way of correct information respecting private characters, 
 facts, and circumstances, personages and affairs, of which, he 
 ventures to speak ; and what portion of his time and thoughts 
 has been given to the subjects he presumes to handle. 
 Books on the healing art have been written in a confident 
 style, with every mark of deep learning, and trait of genius : 
 
 * An Attempt to promote the Peace of the Church. Sect. II.
 
 PREFACE. V 
 
 systems have even been built upon them, by able men, who 
 in fact, knew nothing, from their own experience, of the 
 diagnostics of diseases, adjunct or pathognomonic, nor of the 
 natural course of distempers, nor of the operations within 
 us, which, without the aid of art, tend to restore the disor- 
 dered machine to its pristine regularity, — mere closet medical 
 philosophers. No prudent man would take such a guide to 
 health, or listen with patience to his speculations on life, 
 health, disease, and its curative process. * 
 
 These considerations compel me to the disagreeable task 
 of speaking of myself. But irksome as it is, " If these things 
 be necessities, let 's meet them like necessities," and speak 
 like a man who has lived long enough in the world to have 
 all his vanity evaporate into thin air. 
 
 After being under the instruction of an eminent practi- 
 tioner of physic several years, I embarked in the early part 
 of the year 1775, at my native place, Newport, Rhode- 
 Island, in the last ship that escaped the interdicted port of 
 Boston ; and was consigned by my family to Doctor Foth- 
 ergill, in London, for farther improvement. He was 
 a relation on my mother's side, and was born in 
 the same neighbourhood with her in Yorkshire. After 
 enjoying a cordial reception from the Doctor, he sent me in 
 the autumn of the same year to Edinburgh, where I remained 
 nine months, and then returned to the house of my patron 
 in Harpur-street, London, in which I resided about three 
 years, at the same time attending various lectures, expressly 
 on or connected with my profession, also the hospitals, and 
 occasionally some of Fothergill's own practice. In the lat- 
 
 * e. g. the Brunonian system.
 
 VJ PREFACE. 
 
 ter part of the year 1778, he sent me to Ley den, to acquire, 
 as he smilingly said, a little of the Dutch phlegm. To that 
 renowned University I was attached four academical years, 
 making excursions in the four months' vacation of every year 
 to England, France, and elsewhere. When I entered the 
 University, heing requested, agreeably to custom, to inscribe 
 my name and country on the records of matriculation, I 
 wrote after it, " Libera Reipublice Americans Fcedera- 
 T2E Civis " ; which ultimately occasioned more talk and 
 captious remark among some there, and at the Hague, than 
 the subject of it w T as worth,* insomuch that, at my graduation 
 a few years after, I was constrained to add after my name, sub- 
 scribed to my Inaugural Dissertation, only the word Ameri- 
 canus, before I could obtain the imprimatur of the University, 
 and this by the friendly advice and request of the Rector Mag- 
 nificus and Professors : for the British Ambassador at the 
 Hague knew all the gossip, through his agents, among the stu- 
 dents (few of whom were under twenty-five years of age, and 
 some were forty, and from almost every nation in Europe, 
 while there was but one from America ) ; and this at a time 
 when the American struggle was the great topic of universal 
 conversation, and her cause very popular; and when the 
 British Ambassador at the Court of the Hague f domineered 
 the Dutch as if they were English Colonists. 
 
 Our illustrious countryman, John Adams, who succeeded 
 Washington in the Presidency, was sent by Congress to 
 Holland as to sister States to court an alliance. He so* 
 journed in that country over a year before he was publicly 
 
 <' 
 
 * President Adams notices this in his printed Correspondence, p. 572. 
 t Sir Joseph Yorke. See Correspondence, ib.
 
 I'KEFACE. Vll 
 
 acknowledged as the American Minister. He resided almost 
 entirely at Ley den, only nine miles from the Hague, which 
 cities are not farther apart than the extremes of the city of 
 London. During that time, I made one of his family, living, 
 together with his two sons, in the same house. This may 
 account for my strong bias to politics without any wish of ever 
 becoming an official actor in them, ardent as my attachment 
 was to the holy cause of our struggling country. 
 
 My venerable kinsman in London, my fulcrum in every 
 thing good, was a conscientious advocate of the American 
 cause, as far as a wise, loyal, and honest Englishman could or 
 ought to be.* He labored clay and night with Dr. Franklin 
 and others to prevent hostilities with the colonists ; and after- 
 wards, when the battle raged with alternate success, he en- 
 deavoured to open the eyes of the King and his Minister ; 
 for he had in the course of his profession, and from his rank in 
 life, the facilities to attempt it. Their ignorance of America was 
 astonishing ! The people of Britain generally were ignorant 
 whence we sprung ; what language we spoke ; what religion 
 we professed ; and even of what complexion we were. The 
 Island of Virginia was spoken of in a Court of Judi- 
 cature, by a learned pleader. In a word, ignorance of 
 this vats region pervaded England, Scotland, and Ireland, — 
 their Universities, their Courts of Law, the Legislature, 
 and, in too general a manner, even the administration of 
 George the Third ; otherwise it is impossible to account for 
 
 
 * Sec his " Considerations relative to the North American Colonies" 
 printed in 1765, and " .fin English Freeholder's Address to his Country- 
 meri" printed in 1779, in which his decided opinion upon political mat- 
 ters is manifested.
 
 Vlll PREFACE. 
 
 its conduct, unless we may attribute their ignorance to judicial 
 infatuation. Were we to descend to a less general view, we 
 might remark that the monarch, his minister, and advisers, 
 private and ostensible, were more inclined to lend a listening 
 ear to vindictive refugee governors, contractors, and hungry 
 expectants on both sides the Tweed, than to the words of 
 truth and soberness ; and this fatal delusion operated the 
 division of one half of the Empire from the other, and 
 formed an epoch in the history of nations. 
 
 In Franklin's affection, next after America, was England ; 
 with Fothergill, next to his native land was America. He 
 had long studied our country ; his father having visited it, 
 and travelled through it twice at distant periods, and his 
 brother once, with no mercantile or worldly views whatever. 
 Fothergill and Franklin were patriotic men. Both of them 
 wished, most ardently wished, for such an union between 
 Great Britain and America, as should be equally just, honora- 
 ble, and beneficial to both countries ; and that great Physician 
 never ceased to the last week of his useful life to urge the 
 necessity of Peace with America. Hence the reader 
 sees, — and who can wonder, that Medicine and Politics were 
 mixed together in a young, ardent, and anxious brain, far 
 distant from his suffering country ! 
 
 After recovery from a slight infection caught from Thom- 
 as Paine, which disorder never rose to delirium, I was mar- 
 vellously struck by the Letters of Junius ; and my rapture 
 increased at every review of the brilliant and weighty 
 volumes. The high and noble bearing of that writer, 
 seemed akin to that daring spirit which impelled the Ameri- 
 cans to declare not only resistance, but defiance, to the gigan- 
 tic power of Britain, — an inspiration, we believed, like that 
 

 
 PREFACE. IX 
 
 which emboldened young David to combat and prostrate 
 Goliah. Enough, and perhaps more than enough, has been 
 said to show that the healing art did not engross all my 
 thoughts. 
 
 My mind was first impressed with the belief that Lord 
 Chatham was Junius, by contemplating the high-wrought 
 and very singular panegyric of that nobleman in the fifty- 
 fourth Letter of the work in question ; an impression, 
 which time and reflection have deepened. I now and 
 then committed my thoughts to paper, and looked for- 
 ward to a more convenient season for enlarging and arrang- 
 ing a premeditated publication, not confined to the valorous 
 Knight in armour of polished steel and closed beaver, but 
 extended to other men without a visor. But that time came 
 not till old age, with its dilatory concomitants, crept insensibly 
 upon me ; admonitory to others not to put off a literary task 
 to that late period, when loitering hours are wasted in 
 rumination, rather than spent in accmisition. 
 
 I was called in 1783, by the authorities of the state of Mas- 
 sachusetts, and of the University in this place, to commence a 
 second Medical School. The only one then existing in 
 America was at Philadelphia. My duties in the complicated 
 department of the Theory and Practice of Physic in a great 
 measure shut out politics. I performed those duties dur- 
 ing thirty years ; seventeen years of that time I was 
 pleasantly employed in rearing the hitherto neglected sci- 
 ence of Natural History amongst us. I labored Min- 
 eralogy and Botany. Of the first a word had never been 
 uttered publicly, from teacher to pupil, in this country ; 
 of Botany almost as little. T. therefore selected and broke 
 up the ground, and sowed the seed, and left the easier task of 
 b
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 smoothing it to those who came after me with their nomen- 
 clatures and systematical arrangements. The botanical 
 branch grew and flourished like Naboth's vineyard, and 
 shared the same fate, from the like cause.* As to Mineralo- 
 gy, being even more simple than Botany, it increased sur- 
 prisingly in various parts of the Northern, Middle, and West- 
 ern States, so as greatly to outstrip the knowledge of its first 
 promulgator in this region. His original intention was merely 
 to suggest to his countrymen to be no longer indebted to 
 -Europe and other regions for riches which Providence had 
 bountifully laid under their feet. The instruction in these 
 two branches of natural science was a volunteer service 
 without any aid from the University, or the Government. 
 
 These things occupied my mind intently, and almost en- 
 grossed it, when a sudden and unexpected task seemed, if I 
 may speak so, thrown down before me. When in England, 
 I had never seen Dr. Jenner, nor heard his name. In the 
 year 1799, he, through Dr. Leitsom, communicated to me 
 the discovery of the prophylactic power of Vaccination 
 with the means of practising it. The prospect of the vast im- 
 portance, not only to my country, but to mankind, of this 
 discovery, so filled my mind, that I put every other conside- 
 ration under my feet, and gave myself up to the cultivation 
 and diffusion of a practice, destined to withdraw another 
 evil from the condition of man. I willingly sacrificed my 
 private business to this great work. For seven years I 
 defended this salutiferous practice, in its disputed march 
 through a host of enemies, till it attained a triumph so com- 
 
 * See the Botanist, in one volume, printed in 1811, dedicated to 
 President Adams.
 
 PREFACE. XI 
 
 plete, that throughout the six New England States, it is rare, 
 very rare, indeed, at this time, to meet an American wearing 
 in his face the marks of small pox. 
 
 Towards the close of the thirty years of my connexion 
 with the University of Cambridge, the evil times arrived, 
 when those unruly passions rose, from which come wars and 
 fightings, hard words, jealousies, and fears ; in which, let a man 
 say what he would, write what he would, or be silent, he was 
 sure not to please more than one half of the community. 
 The consequence of this state of things constrained me 
 to dissolve my connexion with the University in 1812. 
 
 The President of the United States saw this disagreeable 
 condition of things, and following the example of his prede- 
 cessor, Jefferson, gave me the Medical Superintendency of 
 the nine military posts of the United States in New England, 
 with as much indulgence as his duty to the public would ad- 
 mit. I held this pleasant station from 1813 to 1820 ; and 
 from that period have withdrawn myself from every profes- 
 sional concern, save epistolary consultations and extraordinary 
 cases. From that time and not before, I found leisure to 
 write " Concerning Junius and his Letters " ; and to read 
 all I could find that had been written by others. The result 
 has been the book in your hand. Not that this engrossed 
 my mind entirely. I found time and inclination for making 
 a sketch, too long neglected, of the life and character of the 
 great and early file-leader of our revolution. I also attempt- 
 ed to wipe off some of the aspersions cast upon the greatest 
 man of our age, who died in the full belief that jJosterity would 
 do his character justice. In the estimation of characters, 
 space operates like time.
 
 Xll PREFACE. 
 
 I was convinced that people looked too low for the author 
 of Junius — among the weeds and shrubbery, instead of the 
 oaks and elms of Old England, or else I magnified the produc- 
 tion beyond reason. I compared its style and diction with 
 the prose writings of Milton, with Swift, with the precise 
 Gibbon and Johnson, and with the luxuriant Burke, and 
 thought I discovered something in Junius superior to any of 
 them, — a personal ardor, a feeling, a deep experience, a self- 
 conviction, a patriotic enthusiasm, and a martyr-like devotion 
 in risking discovery, and all sublimed by a fire better regula- 
 ted than that of Dante or Milton. I could find nothing that 
 amalgamated with the best Letters of Junius but the best 
 Speeches of Lord Chatham. 
 
 Furthermore ; to whom can be applied the motto of 
 " Stat " [magni] " Nominis Umbra," omitting through 
 modesty the magni, but to the Earl of Chatham ? 
 
 Among the disadvantages of situation in writing such a 
 book as this, is the liability to err in compellation, from the 
 changeableness of names and titles of members of Parliament 
 of both Houses. Even in relation to this country, now void of 
 titles, British senators, historians, and pamphleteers frequently 
 mistake one man of the same surname for another. A fact of 
 this sort that might be determined in a few minutes in Lon- 
 don, has cost weeks of inquiry here, and ended in uncer- 
 tainty. 
 
 Moreover, an apprehension exists, lest in a long course of 
 years, I may have made extracts on small pieces of paper, 
 backs of letters, and the like, and in the lapse of time and 
 wane of memory, have forgotten whether they were my own 
 thoughts or those of others ; and this is more likely to have 
 occurred at a recent date, than at a remote one ; for reminis-
 
 PREFACE. X1M 
 
 cence is, I find, more faithful to facts of half a century ago, 
 than to those of the current year. But this error cannot 
 have occurred very often. 
 
 As to the curious popular question — Whether the terrific 
 man in the masJc was the great Lord Chatham, I have noth- 
 ing farther to urge here. In stating a connected series of 
 facts, I have laid no traps for the understanding of the reader, 
 but left him to judge for himself — to remark, as he proceeds, 
 how the parts cohere with the subject, and where contrarie- 
 ties appear to lie across, threatening the harmony of our hy- 
 pothesis. 
 
 If I have been too often silent in regard to authorities, I 
 would remind the reader that the physician is more in the way 
 of knowing the whole interior of habitations, domestic char- 
 acters, and sentiments, than any other class of gentlemen 
 whatever. * Dr. Fothergill practised forty years at the 
 court end of London, was Physician to many of the nobility, 
 and most of its old families, and occasionally was consulted 
 by the first rank in the kingdom. His prudence and delica- 
 cy were equal to his wisdom ; yet it would be difficult for an 
 affable man to conceal entirely his opinion of characters occupy- 
 ing different ranks in authority, from one who prudently sought 
 information. Nearly every night, during three years, I, with 
 my transcript Lectures and common-place book, sat at the 
 same table with that industrious philanthropist, from eight 
 o'clock to eleven, both of us exercising our pens in our own 
 way. Had I possessed any of the Bosivellian ambition, I had 
 
 * See the correspondence of Lord and Lady Chatham with Dr. M- 
 dington, their family Physician, and Sir James Wright, relative to Lord 
 Bute, p. 3G7 of this volume.
 
 XIV PREFACE. 
 
 the best opportunity of compiling a Fothergilliana , which 
 might well wear for its motto that on the Fothergillian Med- 
 al " FOTHERGILLIUS. MeDICUS. AMICUS. HoMO." 
 
 Besides the heads of the noble Houses of Northumberland 
 and Portland, the Doctor appeared to be most acquainted 
 with the Marquis of Rockingham, and Lords Camden and 
 Shelburne. I never knew that he ever spoke with Lord Chat- 
 ham or North. He frequently expressed his great pleasure 
 in repeated conversations with Lord Mansfield, who was 
 now and then his patient, as was Lord Chancellor Thurlow. 
 He, more than once, to my certain knowledge, made written 
 communications to Lord North respecting the real state of 
 things in America, during the war ; and received, after a 
 week or ten days' delay, very respectful answers ; but not 
 admitting, to the full, the correctness of all the information, 
 till the conduct of France proclaimed its truth to all the world ! 
 Wisdom can draw, even from such a book as this, lessons 
 moral and political. The reader of it has seen Retribution's 
 refluent wave passing overcertain individuals, and a whole 
 nation. He has seen that God's ways are not like man's 
 ways, — that He makes use of the smallest means and causes 
 to operate the greatest and most powerful effects. " In His 
 hands, a pepper-corn is the foundation of the power, glory, 
 and riches of India. He makes an Acorn, and by it com- 
 municates power and riches to a nation." # 
 
 CAMBRIDGE, NEW ENGLAND, 1830. 
 
 * Bruce on the Source of the Nile.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 Pago 
 
 Preliminary View 1 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 The first Impression made by Junius's Letters in Old England, 
 and in New. — The first Question, Who is Junius ? — Suspicion 
 fell on the Right Hon. Edmumd Burke. — Arguments against 
 that Supposition. — An Episode 75 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 Impossible that Junius could have been the sole Depositary of 
 his own Secret. — Must have been past the Noon of Life. — ■ 
 A Nobleman, rich, and powerful. — His Writings marked by 
 Peculiarity of Style. — Their Tendency always Patriotic, and 
 exclusively English. — His Letter to Lord Cambden different 
 from all the Rest 97 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 Of the Life and Character of the Earl of Chatham 119 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 Life and Character of the Earl of Chatham, continued .... 133 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 Life and Character of the Earl of Chatham, continued .... 150 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 Life and Character of the Earl of Chatham, continued .... 166 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 Life and Character of the Earl of Chatham, continued .... 175 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 Certain Difficulties pointed out, and discussed 196
 
 xvi CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 Stratagems and Subterfuges of Politicians. Junius's Co-operation 
 with the Whig-Party. Chatham never countenanced American 
 Independency. This always maintained by Samuel Adams in 
 Massachusetts, and by Stephen Hopkins in Rhode Island. 
 Sketch of the Character of Samuel Adams. Independency 
 never lost Sight of in Massachusetts. Conceded by the Author 
 — Confirmed by Chalmers. Miscellaneous Observations . . . 235 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 Parallelism between Junius's Letters and Chatham's Speeches . 261 
 
 CHAPTER XL 
 
 Notices of Lord Camden, Lord Chief Justice Mansfield, Lord 
 Holland, the Duke of Bedford, the Duke of Grafton, and Lord 
 Amherst, in Reference to Junius 305 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 Transcription and Transmission of Junius's Letters 354 
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 Character and Policy of George the Third 384 
 
 General Washington's Resignation of his Commission .... 444 
 Address of the President of Congress to Washington on his 
 
 Resignation 444 
 
 Introductory Audience of the first Minister from the United 
 
 States to George the Third 445 
 
 Conclusion 449 
 
 ERRATA. 
 
 Page vii, line 23, for vats read vast 
 " 111, " 20, dele the brackets [_ ] 
 " 271, " 8, for mislead read misled
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 Much has been said in America, and more in 
 Britain, on this celebrated question, — Who was the 
 author of those famous Letters which appeared in the 
 early part of the reign of King George the Third, 
 under the signature of Junius ? 
 
 These Letters were intended, it seems, for the En- 
 glish nation generally, but addressed, most of them, 
 nominally, to certain individuals of the highest rank 
 in it. They were of a character to attract great at- 
 tention in that country and in this, by their facts, 
 their boldness, and their splendid diction. They first 
 appeared in a London Newspaper, entitled " The 
 Public Advertiser" printed by Henry Sampson Wood- 
 fall, a man well educated, complete in his business, 
 and of discreet, steady, and respectable character in 
 his profession. They came forth about nine years 
 after the accession of a young King, who could, and 
 did boast that he was a native Englishman* and at a 
 critical period, and under circumstances which gave 
 them great interest and effect. By his motto — Stat 
 nominis umbra,] the writer stipulates, with the reader, 
 
 * The King's first speech to Parliament. 
 
 \ " Slat magni nominis umbra," Lucax ; He stands the shadoiv of 
 a mighty name ; or, paraphrastic ally, He exhibits a faint image of his 
 former greatness. 
 
 1
 
 2 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 concealment. To understand his design clearly, it 
 may be needful to give the American reader a gene- 
 ral view of the affairs and condition of things in the 
 reign preceding; that he may see the cause and 
 effect of that change, which has made the history of 
 George the Third so remarkable in that country and 
 in this ; and which forms that link in the chain of our 
 history, which connects the old world with the new. 
 In the course of our discussion, Junius may appear 
 a primary, or a secondary object ; for the mere solu- 
 tion of a puzzling question is hardly worth the labor 
 we shall probably bestow upon it. 
 
 It appears from the best moral and political writers 
 of the day, that in the latter years of the long pro- 
 tracted reign of George the Second, the English na- 
 tion, and particularly London, had gradually slid 
 down into an idle, vain, luxurious, and selfish effemi- 
 nacy ; not so much from absolutely bad traits in the 
 character of the King or his Queen, as from a de- 
 generacy of manners and principles, bred and foster- 
 ed, as some w r ould fain make us believe, by the 
 celebrated prime minister of King George the First 
 and the Second ; which has rendered, according to 
 the parties to whom you listen, the name of Sir 
 Robert Walpole notorious, or honorably famous. 
 
 Who but He who made the human heart, and 
 gave the secret bias of the soul, shall pronounce the 
 character and true motives of Kings ? We shall 
 draw upon writers of the first reputation, and speak 
 according to our best judgment, being all along 
 aware of our liability to error.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 3 
 
 George the Second, by birth and education a 
 German, was, it appears, on the whole, a good man, 
 just, honorable, and brave ; but poorly fitted, by nature 
 and education, to be King of Britain, in which Island 
 he was always, in a manner, a stranger. Being past 
 thirty years of age when the Hanover succession 
 took place, his native electorate was nearer his heart 
 than Great Britain, and this natural partiality affected 
 too many of his measures, and often hung a heavy 
 weight on the machinery of his government. He 
 ever aimed at doing right, but was less acquainted 
 with the English constitution, laws, politics, and 
 peculiar character, than with the policy and in- 
 trigues of the leading powers on the continent, 
 constituting the science of the balance of power. 
 He said to his favorite, the Earl of Waldegrave — 
 " You are a very extraordinary people, continually 
 talking of your constitution, laws, and liberty ; — you 
 pass near an hundred laws every session, which 
 seem made for no other purpose but to afford the 
 pleasure of breaking them." The same nobleman says, 
 that " the King had a good understanding, though 
 not of the first class, and a clear insight into men 
 and things, within a certain compass.'''' The celebrat- 
 ed Lord Chesterfield, known, slightly, in this country, 
 by his Letters to his son, tells us, " that George the 
 First was a dull German gentleman, who neither 
 understood nor concerned himself about the interest 
 of England, but was well acquainted with the inter- 
 est of Hanover ; and that his son, George the Second, 
 was all that, leaving out the word gentleman." * 
 
 * Chesterfield was Secretary of State to George the Second.
 
 4 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 According to Mr. Glover, a member of Parliament, 
 and a distinguished literary character,* " George the 
 Second was a weak, narrow-minded, sordid, and 
 unfeeling master, who, seated by fortune on a 
 throne, was calculated by nature for a pawn-broker's 
 shop." Lord Waldegrave, who was bound by the 
 ties of gratitude to that monarch, acknowledges that 
 too great attention to money was his capital failing — 
 that, however, " he was always just, and sometimes 
 charitable, though seldom generous." Mr. Belsham, 
 a very respectable and rational whig writer of a 
 History of Great Britain, says of George the Sec- 
 ond, " that equally a stranger to learning and 
 the a arts, he saw the rapid increase of both under 
 his reign, without contributing, in the remotest 
 degree, to accelerate that progression by any mode 
 of encouragement, or even bestowing, probably, 
 a single thought on the means of their advancement, 
 — that, inheriting all the political prejudices of his 
 father, he was never able to extend his views beyond 
 the adjustment of the Germanic balance of powers ; 
 and with unsuspicious satisfaction in that system, 
 into which he had been early initiated, he never rose 
 even to the conception of that simple, dignified, and 
 impartial conduct, which it is equally the honor and 
 interest of Great Britain to maintain in all the com- 
 plicated contests of the continental states." 
 
 Belsham's, we think, is the most impartial character 
 of the old Hanoverian King of England ; yet some 
 doubts hover over my mind, as to the exact likeness 
 
 * Author of a popular drama, entitled Leonidas.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 5 
 
 of the picture. A German military education of a 
 Prince has a direct tendency to make him an unfeel- 
 ing despot. It greatly injured our favorite, the Duke 
 of Kent. The High-German character is at a greater 
 distance from the English than that of the Low- 
 Dutch. It is evident that the second George had 
 wisdom enough to perceive, that his German military 
 education disqualified him from governing properly 
 so peculiar a people as the British really are. He 
 therefore, after several mortifying occurrences and 
 disappointments, allowed his minister, Sir Robert 
 JValpole, to hire his officers and his Parliament to be 
 good, as he had not either the power to compel, or 
 the address to manage them himself. To bribe men 
 or children without corrupting them is a very difficult 
 task. Walpole, however, ventured on the experi- 
 ment ; and if it did not succeed entirely to his own 
 and the nation's wish, may we not attribute it to some- 
 thing else than wickedness of heart in the minister? 
 Nevertheless, it was any thing but true wisdom, a 
 mere temporary palliation, as it not only produced a 
 lax and careless government, but contributed to loose 
 and frivolous morals in the great family of England. 
 I say England, for Scotland was still marked by her 
 poverty, characteristic frugality, discretion, and safe 
 morality. 
 
 While a host of idle gentlemen were looking up to 
 the King and his Minister for immediate or future 
 favors and rewards, mental energy and individual 
 virtue gradually disappeared. The character of those 
 times (from 1740 to 1756) in England was not so 
 much that of very gross vice, or profligacy, as of in-
 
 6 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 dolence, lack of spirit, the love of money, for which 
 they had royal example, and the love of gaming, all 
 with a view to indulging laziness, ridiculous pride, and 
 effeminacy, evinced in the vanity of dress, in parade 
 of equipage, and in the ostentation of title and of 
 fortune.* It was an age of intemperance, frivolity, 
 and self-indulgence, rather than crime. The root of 
 all these enervating evils had been found growing in 
 a rich and rank soil prepared by Sir Robert Wal- 
 pole ; hence he has been called the " father of cor- 
 ruption." 
 
 The enemies of this eminent minister, amongst 
 whom may be enumerated the famous William Pitt, 
 drove him, at last, from his station, when he took 
 shelter in the House of Peers, under the title of the 
 Earl of Orford, with a pension of four thousand 
 pounds a year. This shows the estimation in which 
 he was held by his, if not generous, at least just sove- 
 reign ; and we can add, that he continued honored 
 and respected during the rest of his life. 
 
 That we may form a correct judgment of those 
 times, let us attend a moment to what was said in 
 the House of Commons by Mr. Pitt, afterward Earl 
 of Chatham. — " None," said he, " but a nation who 
 had lost all signs of virility, would submit to the 
 treatment you have endured from France and Spain." 
 A few years after, he declared, in the same place, 
 his solemn belief, that there was a determined 
 resolution, both in the naval and military command- 
 
 * See on this subject the Rev. Dr. Brown's " Estimate of the Man- 
 ners and Principles of the Times" six editions of which were published 
 in England, and one in America in the year 1758.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 7 
 
 ers, against any vigorous exertions of the national 
 power. He affirmed, that, though his majesty ap- 
 peared ready to embrace every measure proposed 
 by his ministers, for the honor and interest of the 
 British dominions, yet scarce a man could be found 
 with whom the execution of any plan, in which there 
 was the least danger, could with confidence be trust- 
 ed. He instanced the inactivity of Lord Loudon, 
 with his large force in America.* Besides this gen- 
 eral inertness in the British military officers, Mr. Pitt 
 said that indolence and neglect pervaded other de- 
 partments of the service ; that the contractors and 
 purveyors were ignorant of their own business ; that 
 the extent of their knowledge went only to the 
 making of false accounts. He said more to the same 
 effect in the year 1 757. This was a condition of things 
 most mortifying to the few great and good men, who 
 at that time adorned Great Britain; yet it was not 
 very difficult to account for it. 
 
 In this sad state of affairs, the English people saw 
 one half of their nobility and gentry waiting for the 
 old king to die, while the other half were gazing with 
 gladsome faces upon the heir apparent, Frederic, 
 Prince of Wales, and his more energetic spouse, a Prin- 
 cess of Saxo-Gothic origin and education. Two sep- 
 arate courts were kept; the centres of two opposing 
 parties. The old king was the nucleus of that at St. 
 
 * This incompetent military commander disgusted our countrymen, 
 not merely by his haughty demeanor, and contempt of our soldiery, but 
 by his manifest incapacity for his station. See Dr. Franklin's Memoirs. 
 The Provincials in authority had feelings towards Lord Loudon, 
 like those of the Dutch towards the Earl of Leicester, in the reign of 
 Queen Elizabeth.
 
 3 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 James's, while his hopeful son received the homage of 
 expectants at Leicester-House. But, to the confusion 
 of an host of aspirants, the Prince of Wales died of a 
 short illness, in the 46th year of his life, leaving his 
 son, Prince George, presumptive heir to the crown. 
 This unlooked for event gave to the two courts a new, 
 and not very agreeable face, with feelings that require 
 a Shakspeare to describe them. The aged monarch 
 had very Kttle affection for his son Frederic, and the 
 prince not too much reverence for his father. The 
 paternal system of bringing up and educating children 
 among the Germans is very different from that of the 
 English, and at a very great distance from that of our 
 own country. 
 
 The Leicester-House Court, which had obtained 
 from the opposite party the nickname of " faction," 
 was not better assorted than that at St. James's. It 
 consisted of men of singular and opposite characters. 
 The most conspicuous personage in it was John 
 Earl of Bute, who had been made, not without con- 
 siderable difficulty, and some scandal, groom of the 
 stole, answering in our language to keeper of a prince's 
 wardrobe. He was a Scotchman of handsome figure, 
 theatrical air, and showy accomplishments, with a 
 measured solemnity of manner, imparting an im- 
 pression that it was not recently assumed, but 
 " dyed in the wool." Mr. Doddington, afterwards 
 Lord Melcombe, was another favorite of a different 
 stamp, a man of courtly talents and pliant constitu- 
 tion, unsteady in his principles, vain, selfish, and 
 inconstant, yet very useful to men of an opposite 
 character ; for he was quick in discernment and ca-
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 9 
 
 pable of giving good advice, yet a gossip withal, as 
 evinced by his printed diary. 
 
 His royal Highness, Prince Frederic, was univer- 
 sally considered very much below his brother next 
 in age to him, William, Duke of Cumberland, the fa- 
 vorite son of George the Second ; for William was 
 very respectable as a man of sense, and a soldier, 
 complete according to the German system of rigid 
 discipline ; whereas his elder brother was deficient 
 in the ordinary dictates of prudence. He used to 
 discuss freely and openly with his adherents the 
 general system of his administration when his father's 
 death should call him to the throne, of which he 
 never admitted the least doubt. How unlike his 
 grandson, the present monarch of England ! " Per- 
 haps," says the historian of the life of Pitt, Earl of 
 Chatham,* " nothing ever more forcibly proved the 
 uncertain lot of humanity, and the vanity of all hu- 
 man expectations, than the plans and hopes of those 
 who regarded him as their future sovereign. His 
 father's years exceeded those generally allotted to 
 man ; and his own succession to the throne was an- 
 ticipated as an event of almost daily probability. 
 The political aspirant already fancied himself in pos- 
 session of those honors in a future reign, which were 
 denied to him under the present sovereign." 
 
 The court of the late Frederic, Prince of Wales, 
 at Leicester-House, had regarded with an evil eye 
 the old, stiff, and formal assemblage at St. James's. 
 Directly on the unexpected death of the Prince, a 
 
 * History of the Right Hon. William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. By the 
 Rev. Francis Thackeray. 3 vols. 4to. Lond. 1817. 
 
 2
 
 1 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 new and strenuous contest arose ; and this was for 
 nothing less than who should get possession of Prince 
 George, now the heir apparent, and mould him to 
 their wish and will, so as to influence him after he 
 became king. The ascendency of his mother was 
 hardly then known beyond the walls of the nursery, 
 nor was the indirect influence of Lord Bute much 
 suspected abroad. The Princess Dowager of Wales, 
 a smart woman of peculiar talents, partaking more of 
 the French cast of character than the English, now 
 incessantly sounded in the ears of her son, this short 
 maxim, — " George, be King ! " — that is, being inter- 
 preted, 'Beware of the shackles to which your grand- 
 father submits ; do as We direct you, and beyond 
 that, have your own way ' : — and his own way he 
 had, until the nation was, as we shall see, on the 
 brink of ruin, brought thither by his constitutional 
 obstinacy in his war with these colonies. 
 
 Before the death of Frederic, and indeed after it, 
 the aged monarch, his father, was sadly perplexed 
 with little factions springing up, apparently causeless, 
 but really from the lack of diverting objects, which 
 are but few in Britain compared with France. The 
 King and people were pretty constantly haunted by 
 two appalling spectres, one " the Pretender," the 
 other a French invasion. The exhaustless fund of 
 information, amusement, and gratification derived 
 from the history of nature, from philosophy gen- 
 erally, from the study of physics, from polite litera- 
 ture and the fine arts, found no encouragement 
 at the court of George the Second. The rich- 
 est noblemen of England, and private gentlemen of
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. \ \ 
 
 immense fortune, with whom Britain abounds, have 
 not the adequate objects for enjoying their personal 
 wealth in their native island, nor the turn for culti- 
 vating their minds which the opulent Dutch have. 
 Hence they leave their homes, and simple forms of 
 religion, to roam in France and in Italy, where 
 amusement and fashion are interwoven with the 
 government and the religion, and reduced almost 
 to a science. It was apparent, that the manners of 
 France, Italy, and Germany had their influence in 
 England, while the spirit of Old England operated 
 little or nothing upon those countries. It was just so 
 in ancient times. The opulent young Romans were 
 wont to stray from home through the more polished 
 states of Greece, to the grief and scandal of the wise 
 and patriotic Cato. 
 
 The sad degeneracy of manners and principles 
 already hinted at was not owing to Italian or French 
 influence superinduced on a Stuart education, as in 
 the case of King Charles the First; nor was it owing 
 to absolute profligacy, as in the reign of his immoral 
 son ; but it sprang from the root of all evil, the love 
 of money, combined with idleness. The gloomy and 
 chilly atmosphere, which settled around the aged 
 monarch, produced a drowsiness in all. Even at the 
 royal levee, the stiff old German monarch generally 
 " stood," says that provoking writer, Horace Walpole, 
 "on one spot, with his eyes fixed on the floor, and but 
 seldom raised to converse, only dropping now and 
 then, a bit of German news. It was more like the 
 den of a lion than the levee of a king." With due 
 allowance for this well known noble snarler, we be-
 
 ]2 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 lieve that Lord Orford had grounds for his sarcastic 
 description. Now this behaviour in the Majesty of 
 Great Britain was not from pride or ill humor, for 
 the King had neither, but from constitutional phlegm, 
 and exotic military manners, which he was too old to 
 throw off. He could not be affable. His very par- 
 tial and affectionate friend, Earl Waldegrave, says, 
 that when he talked, it was very much to the pur- 
 pose, but that he could not discourse with ease in a 
 large company. It was a misfortune, it seems, the 
 King could not surmount, unless he was in a great 
 passion. I say a misfortune ; for if the chief magis- 
 trate of any country is not, to a certain degree, cour- 
 teous and ready, he will find enemies, where he little 
 suspects or deserves them. This was somewhat 
 the case with King William the Third, who felt the 
 like awkwardness, when called from Holland to the 
 
 throne of Britain.* 
 
 In this gloomy condition of the very fountain of 
 
 honor and gallant enterprise, the court of London, 
 instead of being a beautiful and fertilizing river, like 
 her own Thames, changed to a stagnant pond, the 
 atmosphere of which became unpleasant and un- 
 wholesome, till the famous William Pitt broke its 
 scum and dissipated its deleterious vapors. 
 
 While this sluggish state of things lasted, we ought 
 not to be surprised, that gaming, drinking, frivolity, 
 
 * Is not this embarrassment more or less the case with every man in 
 a high station, who has not a complete knowledge of the idioms 
 of the language he is to speak in ? King William the Third, in an- 
 swering, extemporaneously, a loyal address upon his first landing in 
 England, when he meant to say, I come for your good, for the good of 
 you all, unluckily said, " J come for your good, for all your goods ! " 
 This was enough to shut his mouth ever after.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 13 
 
 and their debasing concomitants lowered the charac- 
 ter of the land whence we of New England sprang. 
 Assuredly, idleness and effeminacy are not the char- 
 acteristics of the Britons. The spirit of liberty, un- 
 der most of the Plantagenets, " the barons bold," 
 who obtained the Great Charter, the unextin- 
 guished fire of freedom that glimmered in the em- 
 bers under the reign of the Tudors and of the 
 Stuarts, the flint and steel of our Puritan ancestry, 
 all, all have shown, on smart collision, how great a 
 matter a little fire kindleth. 
 
 Without swerving into the too common cant of the 
 degeneracy of the times, we must acknowledge that 
 there did actually exist in England, from about the 
 year 1741 to 1757, a lamentable deterioration of man- 
 ners and principles, especially in the vast city of 
 London. It was, however, a' favorable symptom, 
 that, in her lethargic condition, the renowned capital 
 and the whole realm felt stung to the quick by the 
 keen reproaches of Mr. Pitt in the House of Com- 
 mons ; and by a few moral writers that appeared 
 about the same time, amongst whom shone pre- 
 eminent the Rev. Dr. Brown, a distinguished epis- 
 copal clergyman. The pulpits of the established 
 church are not remarkable for catechizing the court 
 in England ; less so than in Paris. Dr. Brown's 
 book ran rapidly through six editions in England 
 and one in Boston, in the year 1758. A few pul- 
 pits in Britain followed the example of the author 
 of the " Estimate of the Manners anal Principles 
 of the Times." The most glaring vices and fol- 
 lies of the day were, moreover, met by the keen
 
 14 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 satire of the drama, and by the moral pencil of Ho- 
 garth. If some hung their heads with shame, others 
 started back with affright from the mirror thus held 
 up to them. The more serious and reflecting part of 
 the inhabitants of Old England saw with mortification 
 their vexatious condition ; with an aged Hanoverian 
 King, a stranger, homesick,* destitute of all taste for 
 the beauties of nature, literature, or the arts.f Of mu- 
 sic, he relished only the loud-sounding, rattling peals 
 of a military band. Not altogether wise enough to gov- 
 ern by himself as King of Great Britain, he was not 
 sufficiently magnanimous to be wholly directed by 
 those who were. On ill terms with his eldest son 
 Frederic, he never appeared to regret his loss, while 
 he himself was not correctly moral in his own family. 
 He never seemed to feel himself at home in England. 
 These exotic qualities, propensities, and circumstan- 
 ces conspired to form a thin, perhaps a very thin 
 partition between him and the most correctly moral 
 of the old English nobility. The men respected him 
 
 * Nostalgia, — Desiderium patriae, affiniumve. Linn-EUS. 
 
 f An anecdote may convey some idea of the taste of the second 
 George, and of his relish for the fine arts. When Hogarth painted 
 " The March to Finchley" Lord Chesterfield, then Secretary of State, 
 caused the picture to be brought to the King, thinking that such an 
 admirable painting of his own troops and subjects, enlivened by Ho- 
 garth's characteristic humor, would delight the military monarch, as it 
 did every one who gazed on it. But on viewing it, he colored with 
 rage, and exclaimed, " What does de painter mean 1 ) Does he dare to 
 ridicule my soldiers ! Take away de trumpery. De fellow deserves to he 
 picketted for his impudence." Though half a century has passed away 
 since I saw this admirable picture in the London Foundling-Hospital, 
 every portion of it is fresh in my memory ; the production of real 
 genius in a man capable more than any other of representing on can- 
 vass, I had almost said, all the parts of speech, even to the interjection.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. J 5 
 
 as brave, just, and of good intentions ; and'surround- 
 ed by the halo of the solemn etiquette of a German 
 Generalissimo, he never appeared otherwise than 
 dignified. If he could not always relish the refined 
 wit of Lord Chesterfield, nor entirely comprehend 
 the pure diction of Lord Chatham's communications, 
 he nevertheless was pleased with the deference and 
 politeness of both, and above all with the promptness, 
 decision, and courage of the latter, as will appear 
 hereafter. 
 
 Besides systematic bribery* with a laudable inten- 
 tion, Sir Robert Walpole endeavoured to fill his sove- 
 reign's breast with alarms of conspiracies to bring in 
 " the Pretender," and of French invasions. After 
 that minister was compelled by the popular current, 
 and Pitt's oratory, to retire, the Pelhams, Thomas 
 and Henry, supplied his place. The latter was Duke 
 of Newcastle ; a man of a singular character, and 
 much inferior to his brother, eager and impatient for 
 office, yet ever dreading the clangers of it. He was 
 at once abused, flattered, and ridiculed, yet had he 
 good qualities and great influence. Earl Waldegrave 
 says of him, " In the midst of prosperity and ap- 
 
 * " An English minister wrote to Cardinal Fleury, Premier of Louis 
 the Fifteenth, thus : — ' I pension half the Parliament to keep it quiet. 
 But as the King's money is not sufficient, they, to whom I give none, 
 clamor loudly for war ; it would be expedient for your Eminence to 
 remit me three millions of French livres, in order to silence these 
 barkers. Gold is a metal which here [in England] corrects all ill qual- 
 ities in the blood. A pension of two thousand pounds a year will make 
 the most impetuous warrior in Parliament as tame as a lamb.'" (Me- 
 moirs of the Marchioness of Pompadour, pages 57-59. English trans. 
 17fi(i.) To this end they have in England what they call a manager 
 or conductor of the House of Commons.
 
 16 
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 parent happiness, the slightest disappointment, or any- 
 imaginary evil, will, in a moment, make him misera- 
 ble ; his mind can never be composed ; his spirits 
 are always agitated. Yet this constant ferment, 
 which would wear out and destroy any other man, is 
 perfectly agreeable to his constitution ; he is at the 
 very perfection of health, when his fever is at the 
 greatest height. His character is full of inconsisten- 
 cies ; the man would be thought very singular who 
 differed as much from the rest of the world as he 
 differs from himself." * Yet this whiffling nobleman 
 continued in the highest employments nearly forty 
 years : when his friends were routed, his Grace of 
 Newcastle still maintained his ground ; for he offend- 
 ed no man by his pride, nattered many by an extrav- 
 agant familiarity ; and though he gave bribes, he 
 never was suspected of accepting them ; he greatly 
 impaired his estate by keeping up a good parliamen- 
 tary interest, and he retired without accepting a 
 pension. 
 
 The Duke of Newcastle must have possessed 
 some qualities of an able minister ; yet, says Lord 
 Waldegrave, " Talk with him concerning public or 
 private business, of a nice and delicate nature, he 
 Avill be found confused, irresolute, continually ram- 
 bling from the subject, contradicting himself almost 
 every instant. Hear him speak in Parliament, his 
 manner is ungraceful, his language barbarous, his 
 reason inconclusive. At the same time, he labors 
 through all the confusion of a debate without the 
 
 * Waldegrave's Memoirs, from 1754 to 1758.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. J7 
 
 least distrust of his own abilities ; fights boldly in the 
 dark ; never gives up the cause, nor is he ever at a 
 loss either for words or arguments ; while his extra- 
 ordinary care of his health is a jest even among his 
 flatterers." * 
 
 This good-natured Duke of Newcastle was prime 
 minister to George the Second, when Mr. Pitt was 
 paymaster. But the latter could not refrain from 
 treating his Grace with contempt. In an official con- 
 ference, he told the Duke that he was ignorant of his 
 own business, that he engaged for subsidies, while 
 the King was gone to Hanover, without knowing the 
 extent of the sums ; and for alliances without know- 
 ing the terms. It may be asked, Why did not the 
 Duke dismiss him ? Because the "nervous" minis- 
 ter trembled at the idea of the thunder and lightning 
 of Pitt's oratory in Parliament. So far from resent- 
 ment, he courted his favor, and sent the Hon. 
 Charles Yorke to secure his alliance, and tender his 
 sincere friendship and entire confidence. Mr. Pitt 
 replied, that he labored under the King's displeasure, 
 which the Duke of Newcastle ought to have removed, 
 as he knew that the royal displeasure arose from 
 misrepresentation ; and until that proscription was 
 taken off he would enter into no conversation what- 
 ever, either with his Grace, or any other person from 
 him. Mr. Fox (afterwards Lord Holland), being 
 informed of this difference between the Duke of 
 Newcastle and Mr. Pitt, made a proposal to join 
 Mr. Pitt against the Duke. Mr. Pitt rejected the 
 
 * Waldegrave's Memoirs. 
 
 3
 
 IQ PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 proposal.* This anecdote characterizes the men ; 
 a weeping-willow, and an inflexible English oak ; 
 one bending to every breeze, the other haughty, in- 
 dependent, and severe. What a minister for such 
 an honest, straight-forward monarch as George the 
 Second ! I will not risk perplexing the reader and 
 myself by narrating the undignified squabbles that 
 ensued. I shall only remark that the aged King was 
 left by the eager office-seekers in a manner that de- 
 serves the name of barbarous. He complained, even 
 with tears, to those about him, that he was ungene- 
 rously treated, and that none had conducted towards 
 him with proper consideration since Sir Robert Wal- 
 pole had been unfeelingly driven away from him. 
 
 To this discordant condition of an imbecile court, 
 we may add the unhappy state of morals in every 
 class, as painted by Charles Johnstone in his " Chry- 
 sal, or Adventures of a Guinea" at a period when 
 vice disdained the mask of decorum. Sir Walter 
 Scott, whom no.one will suspect of a disposition to slur 
 the great, says in his Preface to that work, " The 
 general corruption of the ministers themselves, and 
 their undisguised fortunes, acquired by an avowed 
 system of perquisites, carried, in our fathers' times, 
 a corresponding spirit of greed and rapacity into 
 every department, while at the same time it blinded 
 the eyes of those who should have prevented spolia- 
 tion. If those in subordinate offices paid enormous 
 fees to their superiors, it could only be in order to 
 purchase the privilege for themselves of cheating the 
 
 * Anecdote* of the Life of the Right Hon. William Pitt, Earl of 
 Chatham. 7th ed. London. 1810.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 19 
 
 public with impunity ; and in the same manner, if 
 commissaries for the army and navy filled the purses 
 of the commanders, they did so only that they might 
 thereby obtain full license to exercise every sort of 
 pillage, at the expense of the miserable privates. 
 We were well acquainted with men of credit and 
 character, who served in the Havana expedition ; and 
 we have always heard them affirm, that the infamous 
 and horrid scenes described in Chrysal were not in 
 the slightest degree exaggerated. That attention to 
 the wants, that watchful guardianship of the rights 
 and interests of the private soldier and sailor, which 
 in our days do honor to these services, were then 
 totally unknown. The commanders in each depart- 
 ment had in their eye the amassing of wealth, instead 
 of the gathering of laurels, as the minister was deter- 
 mined to enrich himself, with indifference to . the 
 welfare of his country ; and the elder Pitt, as well 
 as Wolfe, were considered as characters almost 
 above humanity, not so much for the eloquence and 
 high talents of the one, or the military skill of the 
 other, as because they made the honor and interest 
 of their country their direct and principal object." 
 
 It was in this sad condition of things regal and 
 common, when the monarch dwelt, in a great meas- 
 ure isolated, and passed his time heavily, ruminat- 
 ing on his perplexities without seeing clearly his way 
 out of them, that one of the oldest peers of the 
 realm* quitted his retirement, to wait upon his lonely 
 sovereign, and confer with him upon his affairs. On 
 
 * Duke of Devonshire.
 
 20 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 this occasion he most earnestly and respectfully ad- 
 vised the King to call Mr. Pitt into his service, as the 
 only man, who, by his superior talents, tried integrity, 
 and overwhelming popularity, could restore things to 
 order ; and in this opinion, he was joined by some ele- 
 vated characters, who had not the most cordial feel- 
 ings towards " the Great Commoner" as he was called. 
 This was a severe trial to the aged monarch's tem- 
 per, for he hated the very name of Pitt, who had, in 
 the House of Commons, thwarted him in most of his 
 German measures and Hanoverian politics ; but he 
 now felt the necessity of compliance, and he acqui- 
 esced in a manner that ought to be recorded to his 
 everlasting honor.* 
 
 The King's aversion to Pitt may be easily con- 
 ceived. He had infinitely more honesty and sin- 
 cerity than Charles the Second, and as a smiling 
 courtier, he came far short of his grandson ; for if 
 any thing disturbed the former you could instantly 
 perceive it. The ministers of the honest-hearted 
 George the Second always knew where to find him. 
 
 As to Mr. Pitt, he was naturally haughty, and con- 
 stitutionally and habitually overbearing. His impa- 
 tience was probably augmented by his gouty diathe- 
 sis. He pursued his patriotic course with little regard 
 to the personal feelings of any man, and he could not 
 easily separate great earnestness from harshness of 
 expression. Being all mind, he had an exhaustless 
 
 * George the Second suffered an irreparable loss in the death of 
 Queen Caroline, who had quick discernment, sound judgment, great 
 prudence, and strong attachment to her passionate spouse, which she 
 exercised to the best effect in spite of Lady Yarmouth's influence.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 21 
 
 treasure of words, and when excited by his subject, 
 he generally used the keenest in exposing ignorance 
 and absurdity, and in denouncing avarice, corruption, 
 and wastefulness. But ever so impetuous, he was 
 always honest, always patriotic and nobly disinter- 
 ested. 
 
 Among the personal friends of George the Second 
 was the Earl of Waldegrave, and the preference did 
 honor to his Majesty's judgment, as that nobleman was 
 wise, learned, and unassuming. Through him the 
 King communicated his heartfelt sentiments to 
 others; for the vacillating Duke of Newcastle, who 
 was jealous of all who had abilities, and ever fearful 
 of the consequences of his own steps, could be no 
 great favorite of a prudent King ; yet had he great 
 influence. Horace Walpole (Lord Orford) thus 
 speaks of his Grace : " At a period of detected mis- 
 government with regard to his country, of ingratitude 
 and disobedience to his master, of caprice, duplicity, 
 and irresolution towards all factions ; when under 
 prosecution by Parliament, and frowned on by his 
 Sovereign, at this instant were the hopes, the vows 
 of all men addressed to him. The outcast of the 
 ministry, the scorn of the court, the jest of the peo- 
 ple, was the arbiter of Britain ! Her king, her 
 patriots, her factions, waited to see into what scale 
 he [the Duke of Newcastle] would fling his influ- 
 ence." Walpole must have transcended his usual 
 style of vituperation, or the Duke must have cun- 
 ningly distributed gifts and little bribes, wherever 
 he moved or meant to move. Yet this nobleman, 
 thus characterized or caricatured, appeared to his
 
 22 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 Majesty the most proper person to treat with re- 
 specting a change. With all his foibles, he was, on 
 the whole, a meritorious man. He was a disinter- 
 ested patriot, spent a princely fortune in honor of 
 his country, and retired without accepting a pension. 
 
 The nation had been precipitated into a war with- 
 out any preparation or provision, with the Duke of 
 Newcastle to conduct it. 
 
 On the 11th of June 1757, the Lord Chief Justice 
 Mansfield was sent for to attend the King at Ken- 
 sington, and after much confidential conversation, his 
 Lordship was empowered to negotiate with Mr. Pitt 
 and the Duke of Newcastle ; and a ministry was 
 formed according to Mr. Pitt's arrangement. With- 
 out detailing the whole, we shall only remark, that 
 Lord Temple was appointed privy seal, the Right 
 Hon. Henry Fox paymaster of all the land forces, 
 and Mr. Pratt (afterwards Lord Camden) attorney 
 general. 
 
 And this is the commencement of William Pitt's 
 glorious administration, during which the power 
 of Great Britain was carried to the highest pitch of 
 renown, partly by the coalition of three heretofore 
 discordant parties, but chiefly by the master-mind, 
 and the extraordinary and honorable popularity, of 
 the great Statesman whom the King, in the true 
 spirit of magnanimity, had called to administer the 
 government. 
 
 The following truly sapient sentences were uttered 
 at the first audience of business between the King 
 and his new minister. Mr. Pitt. " Sire, give me your 
 confidence, and I will deserve it." The King. "De-
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 23 
 
 serve my confidence, and you shall have it." Each 
 kept his word to the end of his Majesty's reign ; 
 and the nation rejoiced in her prosperity accordingly. 
 
 Behold, then, my countrymen, — for I write for 
 you, — an English gentleman, a member of the British 
 House of Representatives, a man without title or 
 fortune, suffering under a cruel hereditary disease, 
 liable to all its dreadful recurrences, a cripple, unable 
 to mount a horse, wielding the destinies of the first 
 maritime nation on the globe, in behalf of an aged 
 and passionate monarch, whose highest eulogium was 
 that of a brave heart and good intentions, and who 
 for a series of years could never hear the name of 
 Pitt without visible marks of anger. 
 
 The minister had an Herculean task before him. 
 He first endeavoured to redeem the English char- 
 acter from the reproach cast upon it by the Wal- 
 polean system of bribery. But in the invidious en- 
 terprise of reformation, difficulties, appalling to any 
 other man, stared him in the face at every turn. Nor 
 was the Duke of Newcastle heartily disposed to 
 lessen them. Pitt's personal character and conduct 
 had a good effect, and formed a striking contrast to 
 the prevalent manners of the times. He, like Car- 
 dinal Richelieu, gave no dinners or suppers, had no 
 levees ; but kept aloof from those moths of time, 
 health, and mental energy : yet not a measure he 
 suggested, action performed, or word uttered, but 
 was distorted to some malicious purpose. He had 
 an excellent coadjutor in the person of the Hon. 
 H. B. Legge, chancellor of the exchequer, a gentle- 
 man of distinguished abilities and sterling integrity.
 
 24 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 The next object of Mr. Pitt's solicitude was the 
 security of these North American colonies from the 
 encroachments of the French, who, with their allies, 
 the Indians, were making an alarming progress on 
 our frontiers. He laid a train for the destruction of 
 the power of France in this new world, and effected 
 it by the skill and bravery of Generals Wolfe and 
 Amherst* 
 
 At home, he roused the slumbering faculties of 
 a then luxurious and spiritless generation. By his 
 extraordinary energy, and his w r onderful powers of 
 eloquence, he excited the pride of the legislature ; 
 called forth reflective reason, and directed it to the 
 reformation of manners and principles. He awakened 
 the army and the navy from their dreaming indolence, 
 and inspirited the whole nation, too long sunk in the 
 laziness of peace. Lest this picture may be thought 
 highly colored, we subjoin what has been said of the 
 British officers of that day, by an eminent writer in the 
 present reign, renowned for his loyalty. f " No science 
 was required on the part of the candidate for a com- 
 mission, no term of service as a cadet, no previous ex- 
 perience whatsoever; the promotion went on equally 
 unimpeded; the boy let loose from school the last 
 week, might in the course of a month be a field-offi- 
 cer, if his friends were disposed to be liberal of 
 money and influence. Others there were, against 
 whom there could be no complaint for want of length 
 
 * The conquest of Canada was earnestly recommended to the Earl 
 of Chatham, when Mr. Pitt, by Dr. Franklin. 
 
 f Sir Walter Scott. Miscellaneous Prose Works, Vol. iv. p. 291. 
 Boston edit. 1829.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 25 
 
 of service, although it might be difficult to see how 
 their experience was improved by it. It was no un- 
 common thing for a commission to be obtained for a 
 child in the cradle ; and when he came from college, 
 the fortunate youth was at least a lieutenant of some 
 standing, by dint of fair promotion. To sum up this 
 catalogue of abuses, commissions were in some in- 
 stances bestowed upon young ladies, when pensions 
 could not be had. We knew ourselves," says Sir 
 Walter Scott, " one fair dame who drew the pay of 
 
 captain in the dragoons, and was probably not 
 
 much less fit for the service than some who, at that 
 period, actually did duty ; for, as we have said, no 
 knowledge of any kind was demanded from the young 
 officers. If they desired to improve themselves in 
 the essential parts of their profession, there were 
 no means open either of direction or of instruction." 
 — "An intelligent sergeant whispered, from time 
 to time, the word of command, which his captain 
 would have been ashamed to have known without 
 prompting ; and thus the duty of the field-day was 
 huddled over rather than performed." 
 
 If this was the case even since our last war with the 
 British, as here represented, what might it not have 
 been under Lord Loudon in America ; and under 
 Admiral Byng in the Mediterranean in the year 1755 ? 
 
 When Pitt took the reins of government the officers, 
 both of sea and land, felt they had now a new master, 
 acquainted thoroughly with his own duties and with 
 theirs. With a keen eye, he scrutinized every de- 
 partment ; and breathed into a startled nation the 
 breath of life, every part of which, even to " these 
 
 4 '
 
 26 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 ends of the earth," (characteristically so called by the 
 London Society for the propagation of the Gospel 
 in foreign parts,) felt the warmth of his invigorating 
 mind, which produced industry, regularity, and de- 
 spatch. There was then harmony at Head Quarters, 
 and unanimity in Parliament. Forty-four French 
 ships of the line, sixty-one frigates, and twenty-six 
 sloops of w r ar, were taken or destroyed by the 
 British ; and with them the commerce of France 
 was in a manner annihilated. In about three years, 
 Pitt wrested from France all her most valuable isl- 
 ands and possessions in both Indies. Nor did his 
 victories stop there ; he prostrated her dangerous 
 power on this continent by the entire conquest of 
 Canada. The annals of no two equally civilized na- 
 tions afford a parallel instance. Prior to this, France 
 was more renowned for arts and arms than England. 
 The modern language of Mars was the French 
 tongue, and we ourselves could not talk properly of 
 the theory or the practice of war, without using it. 
 
 At that epoch, the whole British Empire, in all its 
 vastness, these now United States being then a part 
 of it, included a portion of what used to be called the 
 Mogul Empire, with many islands and colonies in 
 Europe, Asia, Africa, and America. They all 
 looked up with grateful admiration to the Right Hon. 
 William Pitt, as the origin, fountain, and cause of this 
 extraordinary prosperity. Beside the advantages 
 derived from conquests over France and her ally, 
 Spain, that minister had the everlasting honor to 
 leave the late thirteen British colonies in perfect 
 security and happiness ; the inhabitants glowing with
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 27 
 
 warm affection for the parent country, and rejoicing 
 to see riches and glory flow in upon her, from all 
 quarters of the habitable globe. This was the acme 
 of England's power and glory, and of our colonial 
 contentment and good-humor. 
 
 In the midst of this unexampled prosperity, colo- 
 nial contentment, ministerial cordiality, and kingly 
 gratification, George the Second, in the plenitude 
 of health and ruddy old age, dropt dead, as suddenly 
 as if shot, without any previous indisposition. The 
 cause of so sudden extinction of life in an apparently 
 healthy man was accounted extraordinary among 
 physicians, — a bursting of the heart.* The public as- 
 tonishment was great, and the first effects astounding. 
 
 We have mentioned with approbation a well writ- 
 ten work entitled " Anecdotes of the Life of the Right 
 Hon. William Pitt, Earl of Chatham; and of the 
 principal Events of his Time, with his Speeches in Par- 
 liament." This modest publication without a name, 
 was evidently countenanced from the first edition, 
 by Earl Temple, and by his sister, the Dowager 
 Countess of Chatham, the first Lord Lyttleton, 
 Governor Poivna/l, and several other noblemen and 
 gentlemen. The nineteenth chapter opens thus : 
 
 " Unfortunately for the glory and interest of Great 
 Britain, on the 25th of October, 1760, the venerable 
 
 * A rupture of either ventricle of the heart is very rare, especially 
 when there was no violent muscular exertion, or mental rage. We 
 may, however, remark as a fact, that, in our medical books, there are 
 more instances of Germans dying suddenly from suppressed violent 
 passion, than of any other people. In phlegmatic habits, it is apt to 
 sink them into insanity.
 
 28 
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 George the Second died. As to the successor, the 
 effects of the wickedness of his advisers have been, 
 and are still, too deeply felt to be described in any 
 terms adequate to the injuries committed. Posterity, 
 in a subsequent age, when truth may be spoken, and 
 the motives of men laid open, will be astonished at 
 the conduct of their ancestors at this period." Leav- 
 ing opinions, let us return to facts. 
 
 When Frederic, Prince of Wales, died (in 1751), 
 he left behind a little fretful court where vegetated, 
 in a hot-bed of toryism, his son Prince George, ihe 
 future King of England. To this picture we must 
 add the figure of a Saxo-Gothic Princess Dowager 
 of Wales, smiling in her weeds with the hope of re- 
 taining under her entire influence this her eldest 
 son, that she might govern him as heretofore, after 
 he should become king. This is the woman whom 
 the indignant Junius called the Daemon of Discord, 
 who watched with a kind of providential malignity 
 over the work of her hands, to correct, improve, and 
 preserve it. " I consider her," says that caustic 
 writer, " not only as the original creating cause of 
 the shameful and deplorable condition of this coun- 
 try, but as a being whose operation is uniform and 
 permanent." * 
 
 The Earl of Waldegrave, Governor to Prince 
 George, informs us, that in the year 1755, i after 
 George the Second returned from Hanover, where he 
 went almost every year, he sent for the Prince of 
 Wales into his closet, to find out the extent of his 
 
 * Letter lxxxvii, 17th Jan. 1771, under the signature of Domitian, 
 recognised by Junius to Mr. Woodfall.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 29 
 
 political knowledge, to sift him in relation to Hano- 
 ver, and to caution him against evil counsellors ; that 
 the discourse was short, the substance kind and af- 
 fectionate, but the manner not quite gracious ; that 
 the Prince was flustered and sulky ; bowed, but 
 scarce made any answer; so the conference ended, 
 very little to the satisfaction of either party. The 
 judicious Lord Waldegrave tacks to the anecdote 
 this remark : — " Here his Majesty was guilty of a 
 very capital mistake ; instead of sending for the 
 Prince, he should have spoken firmly to the mother ; 
 told her, that as she governed her son, she should be 
 answerable for his conduct ; that he would overlook 
 what was past, and treat her still like a friend, if she 
 behaved in a proper manner ; but, on the other hand, 
 if either herself, her son, or any person influenced 
 by them, should give any future disturbance, she 
 must expect no quarter." To which, the noble 
 Governor subjoins this cutting sentence : — " He 
 might then have ended his admonition, by whisper- 
 ing a word in her ear, which would have made her 
 tremble, in spite of her spotless innocence." * 
 
 Mr. Nichols tells us, that Lord Camden, at that 
 time, Mr. Attorney General Pratt, said to his father, 
 (who was physician in ordinary to George the Sec- 
 ond,) — " I see, Doctor, already, that this will be a 
 weak and inglorious reign." That illustrious noble- 
 man and eminent lawyer, the intimate and dear friend 
 of Lord Chatham, lived to see and to feel his pre- 
 diction amply verified ; yet was this unpromising 
 Prince George destined to be the long-lived king of 
 
 * Lord Waldegrave's Memoirs, p. 51.
 
 30 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 the Britons, the Irish, and of a great portion of the 
 Eastern and Western world; and to occupy, by his 
 misfortunes, an uncommonly large space in English 
 history. 
 
 The Leicester-House faction, or fragments of the 
 late systematized opposition, worked with redoubled 
 diligence after the death of the King in sowing the 
 seeds of ambition and mischief, which taking root in a 
 congenial soil produced a baleful fruit, that first poi- 
 soned the obstinate mind of George the Third, and 
 finally destroyed it. The evil had been engendering as 
 far back as the "glorious tj ear fifty -nine" ; when Par- 
 liament were unanimous in favor of all Pitt's war- 
 like measures, and the British arms everywhere vic- 
 torious. We need not say that he was the object of 
 envy and hatred. It followed of course in a mind 
 marked by a strong will and weak judgment. The 
 evil or inflamed eye was pained by Pitt's dazzling 
 brightness, and it was resolved to eclipse it by the 
 intervention of Lord Bute ; accordingly this Scotch 
 nobleman was pushed forward and promoted in so 
 extraordinary a manner, that he soon obtained the 
 odious name of Favorite. 
 
 There were very few signs of cordiality between 
 Frederic, Prince of Wales, and his German spouse. 
 He was not a man of talents, nor studious of the 
 British constitution. He was not a bad man. " He 
 amassed no private treasures, nor adopted any sinis- 
 ter advice with a view to obtain them ; he was not 
 insane, nor under the private tuition of the Prin- 
 cess." * This exalted lady had the reputation of 
 
 * Anecdotes of the Life of Chatham, chap. 8.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 31 
 
 first-rate understanding, by those who knew her 
 not. Lord Waldegrave, who, from his station, must 
 have known her perfectly, says she was " one of 
 those moderate geniuses, who, with much dissimula- 
 tion, a civil address, an assenting conversation, and 
 few ideas of their own, can act with tolerable propri- 
 ety, as long as they are conducted by wise and pru- 
 dent counsellors." He adds that she retained all the 
 jealousy which divided the royal family during the 
 life of her husband ; dreading the power of the Duke 
 of Cumberland, and hating him as much as she feared 
 him." * The Favorite was thought to have a very 
 natural hatred towards " the hero of Cullo&cn" the 
 greatly beloved son of the late monarch. A curious 
 anecdote may illustrate all that we have said of 
 the cabal at Leicester-House. His Royal High- 
 ness the Duke of Cumberland invited his nephew 
 Prince George, when a youth of fourteen, to spend 
 a day at his residence, when he sought by various 
 means to gratify and amuse him. After showing him 
 pictures, books, and articles of curiosity, he took him 
 into a kind of epitomized armory, where were bows 
 and arrows, and halberts, elegant muskets and pis- 
 tols, and variously formed swords of different nations ; 
 one, more splendid than the rest, he took down to 
 show his nephew, on account of its richness and 
 brightness ; on drawing it out of its sheath, the boy 
 screamed as if he would go into fits ; fell on his 
 knees, and in an agony of tears, begged his uncle not 
 to kill him. The Duke stood petrified with astonish- 
 ment and mortification ; as w r ell he might. As soon 
 
 * Lord Waldegravc's Memoirs.
 
 32 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 as the royal youth became sufficiently composed 
 from his fright, the Duke accompanied him home 
 to his mother ; but not without communicating, 
 the disagreeable occurrence, and inquiring whether 
 the terror of Prince George arose from a natural 
 timidity, or from his education and transient conver- 
 sation. 
 
 Although a child, I remember the period of the 
 death of King George the Second, and the very 
 high expectations entertained of his successor, '' the 
 British born King" We, in New England, w T ere 
 taught to believe that George the Third was a re- 
 markably sober, virtuous, and pious young man. On 
 his accession to the throne, our pulpits hailed him as 
 such ; and the University in this place, the oldest in 
 America, and justly deemed in that day the very 
 heart of New England, poured forth its condolence, 
 praises, gratulations, and expectations, in English 
 prose, and Greek and Latin verse, making a consid- 
 erable volume, which was presented to his sacred 
 Majesty by the colony agent, and most graciously 
 received.* 
 
 * The neat volume was entitled Pietas et Gratulatio Collegii 
 Cantabrigiensis apud Novanglos. Bostoni, Massachusettensium. 
 Typis J. Green & J. Russell. 4to. 1761. 
 
 The prefatory address to the young king was sufficiently high seasoned 
 to be relished by any of the Stuart race, if not by the last of the Tudors.* 
 The College availed itself of this apparently auspicious opportunity to ask 
 his Majesty to extend his royal bounty to help and encourage their infant 
 seminary. To which they received this courtly answer ; that " a Col- 
 lege capable of producing such a specimen of genius and learning, 
 stood in no need of help from England.'''' A brilliant spark, struck 
 out by flint and steel; — John Bull, and Jonathan; — an Episcopalian 
 and a Presbyterian ! The English government, since the accession of 
 
 * See Appendix, A.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 33 
 
 Whatever may have been said of the obduracy of 
 George the Third, or insinuated respecting his sin- 
 cerity, all must allow that his behaviour during his 
 youthful minority was morally correct. It is an 
 awkward, trying, and dangerous period to an heir 
 apparent or presumptive, roaming between daylight 
 and dark amidst enemies, under w r hich head we 
 class all flatterers. In this state of ambiguity not a 
 few have lost their way, from the Plantagenets to the 
 last of the Stuarts. Several expectant kings among 
 the British Princes have filled up this irksome space 
 with disgraceful dissipation. Their education has 
 been more strict and more military since the revolu- 
 tion. Yet it remains a question, whether the gov- 
 ernors and instructors of the princes of the House of 
 Brunswick surpassed the ancient Magi in the faculty 
 of teaching princes to instruct themselves, by means 
 of ingenious and happily adapted allegories, selected 
 from the unceasing operations of nature, discernible 
 every where in the economy of the mundane system, 
 and throughout lower creation. Instead of studying 
 the balance of power, the extent of George the Sec- 
 ond's political knowledge, those ancient moral phi- 
 losophers, made from the frame of visible nature, a 
 mirror for the government of a kingdom, and thus 
 gave wholesome lessons from the material world to 
 regulate the moral and political one. George the 
 Third appears, from his conduct towards America, 
 never to have been instructed in this book of wis- 
 
 George the Third, never heartily relished colonial precocity of talent, 
 w bich was discernible in this Little volume, and spoken of in that strum 
 in the London Reviews of 1701. 
 
 5
 
 34 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 dom, written by the finger of nature herself; — the 
 irresistible tendency of intellectual and material 
 things, and the common operations of the human 
 heart, seem to have escaped his observation. 
 
 George, Prince of Wales, having no rakish seeds 
 to germinate w r ithin him, passed the trying period of 
 his youthful minority chiefly in the nursery of his 
 mother, and in the conversation of correct women ; 
 and in company of the Earl of Bute, from whom he 
 learnt princely behaviour, and acquired a portion of 
 that nobleman's Spanish stateliness and theatrical 
 manner. As a domestic man George the Third was 
 addicted to no vice, and swayed by no passion. He 
 was not a weak man. If his objects were little and 
 injudiciously chosen, no monarch, says Mr. Nichols, 
 ever displayed more dexterity in his choice of means 
 to obtain those objects. Nor can any thing be more 
 just than the sentiments of the same gentleman re- 
 specting the Princess Dowager, when he says, " The 
 mother of George the Third had formed her ideas 
 of sovereign power at the court of her father, and 
 she could never bring herself to be of opinion, that 
 sovereignty should be exercised in Great Britain in 
 a manner different from that in which she had seen 
 it exercised at her father's court. In Saxe-Gotha, 
 the sovereignty is property ; in Great Britain, it is 
 magistracy. There, the sovereign's personal wish- 
 es and opinions are to be obeyed, and he is his 
 own minister. In Great Britain the sovereign is to 
 choose for his ministers those whom he thinks most 
 qualified to advise measures beneficial to the coun- 
 try. If he does not approve of the measures they
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 35 
 
 recommend, he may remove his ministers and ap- 
 point others ; but whatever measures are carried 
 into effect, the advisers, ought not only to be re- 
 sponsible, but distinctly known, and recognised as 
 the advisers.* This is not an opinion, which has 
 been only theoretically adopted by those who have 
 treated of the English constitution ; it has been ex- 
 plicitly declared in parliament." f Yet George the 
 Third never adhered to it. Christina, the learned 
 Queen of Sweden, said that " the world was de- 
 ceived when it supposed that Princes are governed 
 by their ministers. However weak a Prince is, he 
 has always more power than his minister. Those 
 persons, said she, who pretend to govern Princes, 
 resemble the keepers of lions and tigers, who most 
 assuredly make these animals play the tricks they 
 wish them to play. At first sight, one would imag- 
 ine that the animals were completely subservient to 
 their keepers ; but, when they least expect it, a pat 
 of the claw, not of the gentlest kind, fells the keep- 
 ers to the ground, who then begin to find, that they 
 never can be perfectly certain that they have com- 
 pletely tamed the animals." Do not the history of 
 Cardinal Wolsey, and the threats of the King to im- 
 peach Lord North for his disgraceful American war, 
 justify the opinion of the philosophic Queen ? 
 
 * This is not the case in these United States, but directly the re- 
 verse ; here the President or Chief Magistrate is alone responsible, 
 and liable to impeachment, while the ministers, or heads of departments, 
 are not liable for any advice given or measures executed. 
 
 ] See "Recollections and Reflections, Personal and Political, as 
 connected with Public Affairs, during the Reign of George the Third. 
 By John Nichols, Esq. member of the House of Commons, in the 15th, 
 16th, and 17th Parliament of Great Britain."
 
 36 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 "When the Princess of Wales," says Mr. Nichols, 
 " came to the Court of England, she found the 
 B/itish Sovereign a very different character from 
 that which she had seen at Saxe-Gotha. She found 
 him controlled by his ministers, indulged in petty 
 gratifications, but compelled to submit to their opin- 
 ions on all important subjects. We cannot therefore 
 be surprised that she was disgusted with this ; and 
 that she ever after impressed upon her son, from his 
 early years, this lessson, — ' George, be King ! ' 
 And this lesson seems to have influenced the King's 
 conduct through the whole of his life. Extreme ap- 
 prehension that his ministers or others might en- 
 croach upon his power, an earnest wish that he 
 might exercise his power personally, or, in other 
 words, that he might be his own minister, have, in a 
 very singular manner, marked his conduct during the 
 whole of his reign." * 
 
 As this was undoubtedly the case, how could it be 
 expected, that a young king so disposed, and so edu- 
 cated would retain for a prime minister such a rigidly 
 just and all-commanding personage as the Earl of 
 Chatham? How to get rid of him was the question. 
 His character was honorable, his abilities transcend- 
 ent, his integrity beyond suspicion, his private life 
 spotless, and his popularity beyond all example. 
 
 When George the Third came to the crown the 
 administration was in possession of the Pelham party, 
 much strengthened by its alliance with Pitt, and 
 popular from his successful conduct of the war. It 
 was perilous to attempt to change such an adminis- 
 
 * Nichols's Recollections and Reflections.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 37 
 
 tration ; yet the King and Lord Bute ventured upon 
 it, and, strange to relate, they succeeded. 
 
 Within six months after the death of George the 
 Second, it was deemed unfashionable in the first cir- 
 cles to speak in terms of much respect of the late 
 monarch, whose domestic character was triumphantly 
 contrasted with that of his chaste and pious grand- 
 son. War began then to be denounced as an anti- 
 christian practice. At length every victory was called 
 a bleeding and dangerous wound on the nearly 
 exhausted body of poor Britannia. Pitt's warlike 
 ambition, instead of being considered a national ben- 
 efit, was said to be draining to exhaustion the finan- 
 ces of the kingdom ; — in a word, that England was 
 in danger of ruin by her victories ; and this style of 
 talking became polite among lords and ladies. All 
 this gradually explained itself, by the discovery of 
 Lord Bute's early resolution to pull down, if possible, 
 the mighty Pitt, avIio stood like a lion in his path. 
 Directly on the death of the late King, Lord Bute 
 betrayed his intentions. " Scarcely was the ink dry 
 which had marked his name upon the council-book, 
 when, although no minister himself, yet he assumed 
 a magisterial air of authority, and began to give law 
 in the court ; and to show, not onlv with what con- 
 tempt he meant to treat the memory and conduct of 
 the deceased monarch, but his dislike of the mea- 
 sures which were then, and had for some time been 
 pursued ; and in order to affront the ministers and 
 the allied army, he invited to court, while the late 
 King lay dead in his palace, the only unpopular man 
 at that time in the kingdom [Lord George Sack-
 
 38 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 ville], who but a few months before, had been de- 
 graded from his rank for disobedience of orders, 
 when in the service of his country." * But in spite 
 of the baleful influence of Bute, of the Princess 
 Dowager, and of their numerous hireling writers, 
 chiefly from beyond the Tweed, the illustrious com- 
 moner yet maintained his popularity. The Parlia- 
 ment was still with him. He stood erect, the pride 
 of the nation, and the dread of her enemies. 
 
 The renowned kingdom of France, composed of a 
 wonderful people, if not ruined on the ocean, was 
 driven to the very verge of a gulf leading to bank- 
 ruptcy, and that chiefly by the suddenly collected 
 energies of Great Britain and of these colonies, 
 wielded by the mighty hand of one man, too de- 
 crepit in body to mount a horse. Not but that 
 France had been, for a series of years, predisposed 
 to deep national disorders, having endured ignoble 
 depressions, according to the testimony of their own 
 writers, f 
 
 After twelve years of supine peace under the reign 
 of good Louis the Sixteenth, France was gradually 
 awakened by a happy influence from these far distant 
 regions, inhabited by the descendants of transplanted 
 Europeans, principally from an English stock. These 
 last were educated pretty generally in the belief that a 
 Frenchman, a Spaniard, a Papist, and the great 
 
 * History of the Minority, from the years 1762 to 1765, 4th edition, 
 London, 1776. 
 
 f See the History of the Private Life of Louis the Fifteenth. This 
 careless monarch died the same year that our first Congress assembled, 
 leaving his people little reason to boast of his virtue, energy, or military 
 force.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 39 
 
 enemy of mankind were consociated to destroy all 
 that was good in morals, holy in religion, or safe in 
 government.* 
 
 From between the years 1758 and 1762 France 
 was, in effect, conquered. She was so weak as 
 not to be able to stand alone ; and was therefore 
 compelled to seek the aid of degenerate Spain to 
 support her tottering steps. Through the mediation 
 of their common spiritual father the Pope, the 
 court of Madrid acceded to the plaintive request of 
 France ; and this led to a close and natural alliance 
 between the two Kings, or rather, three Kings of 
 France, Spain, and the Sicilies ; forming what was 
 called " the family compact," or family alliance of 
 the House or Bourbon ; which confederacy bound 
 them together by the triple cord of politics* kindred, 
 and religion. This famous league was made in De- 
 cember, 1761. Mr. Pitt had early information of the 
 design, and spoke of It in council. At length he dis- 
 covered the warlike preparations of Spain, and not- 
 withstanding her asseverations of peace, he was fully 
 satisfied of the intentions of the insidious court of 
 Madrid to co-operate with France in her existing 
 
 * During nearly two centuries, the people of Boston and of the 
 principal sea-ports in New England, paraded the effigies of the Pope 
 and the Devil, and in later times " the Pretender," through the streets, 
 and at night committed them to the flames. They continued this ad of 
 faith (auto de fe) every fifth of November from an early period in the 
 settlement of this country, until the French fleet arrived in the har- 
 bour of Boston, when Samuel Adams thought it was hardly so polite to 
 treat " our great and good allies," with this strange spectacle ; and 
 the populace submitted, as usual, to his opinion. The fact shows 
 our British education ; and also the first fruits of our emancipation 
 from their bigotry.
 
 40 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 war with England ; and he spoke of it publicly, and 
 urged strongly the prudence of striking the first blow. 
 
 This treaty offensive and defensive sets forth, 
 that the motives of it were the ties of blood between 
 the Kings of France and Spain ; and the object to 
 give stability and permanency to these ties, which 
 naturally grow out of affinity and friendship ; and to 
 establish a solemn and lasting monument of the re- 
 ciprocal interest, which ought to be the basis of the 
 desires of the two monarchs, and of the prosperity of 
 their royal families. It contains twenty-eight arti- 
 cles. We record only three of them. 
 
 " First. Both Kings will, for the future, look upon 
 every power as their enemy that becomes the enemy 
 of either. 
 
 " Secondly. Their Majesties reciprocally guaranty 
 all their dominions in whatever part of the world they 
 be situated. 
 
 " Thirdly. The two Kings extend their guaranty 
 to the King of the two Sicilies, and infant Duke of 
 Parma, on condition that these two princes guaranty 
 the dominions of their Most Christian and Catholic 
 Majesties." 
 
 In modern times, did ever the head of the Roman 
 Catholic Church devise a stronger connexion be- 
 tween kingdoms than this triple tie of kindred, re- 
 ligion, and politics 1 
 
 Mr. Pitt said in council, that this was the very 
 time for humbling the whole House of Bourbon, — that 
 if this opportunity were let slip, it might never be 
 recovered. But as Pitt's great glory grew out of his 
 successful war with France, Lord Bute knew that a
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 4 J 
 
 peace would shear him of his beams, and diminish his 
 popularity. 
 
 Lord Temple supported his brother-in-law, the 
 minister, at the council-board, while the Duke of 
 Newcastle sat mute as a mummy. Pitt declared that 
 he should no longer sit witli them. Thanking the 
 ministers of the late King for their support, he said 
 " he was called to the ministry by the voice of the 
 people, to whom he considered himself accountable 
 for his conduct ; and that he would no longer re- 
 main in a situation, which made him responsible for 
 measures he was no longer allowed to guide." 
 
 When Mr. Pitt made this peremptory address in 
 the Council, Lord Granville, its President, replied 
 thus : 
 
 "I find the gentleman is determined to leave us; 
 nor can I say I am sorry for it, since he would oth- 
 erwise have certainly compelled us to leave him. 
 But if he be resolved to assume the right of advising 
 his Majesty, and directing the operations of the war, 
 to what purpose are we called to this council? 
 When he talks of being responsible to the people, he 
 talks the language of the House of Commons, and 
 forgets, that at this board, he is only responsible to 
 the King. However, though he may possibly have 
 convinced himself of his infallibility, still it remains 
 that we should be equally convinced before we can 
 resign our understandings to his direction, or join with 
 him in the measure he proposes." * 
 
 * See Annual Register, 1761, p. 44. Anecdotes of the Life of Lord 
 Chatham, and Thackeray's Life of him, vol. i. p. 592. 
 
 6
 
 42 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 Lord Granville, highly spoken of by Dean Swift, 
 when Lord Carteret, was generally thought to envy 
 Pitt's fame and talents. He somewhat resembled 
 our great statesman in his oratory, austerity of man- 
 ner, and self-sufficiency, but in little else. Seeing 
 the wind and tide had turned at St. James's, it is not 
 improbable that he might have been selected by the 
 Favorite, as Hume Campbell was in the House of 
 Commons in 1755, to return some of Pitt's "eternal 
 invectives" The British Demosthenes annihilated 
 the latter ; and if he replied to the President of the 
 Council, I have never seen his reply. Lord Granville 
 had considerable weight of talents and of experience 
 in the preceding reign. He was haughty, intempe- 
 rate, and of an inflexible temper, with a short and 
 positive way of expressing it ; yet we should hardly 
 have believed that even he would dare to address 
 Pitt in such a bitter style of reproof. He said in the 
 latter part of the reign of George the Second, that 
 the King was surrounded by a faction, that he was a 
 prisoner on his throne, and that a different adminis- 
 tration ought to be formed for the interest of the 
 country, and the emancipation of the King. We 
 learn from these anecdotes that every sluice was 
 opened to sweep Pitt off his ground. 
 
 When George the Second died, the British Em- 
 pire, in all its vastness and territorial grandeur, was 
 hardly second to that of Rome. Its matchless com- 
 merce bound the world together by a golden chain, 
 while its laws utterly abjured slavery. Every 
 " liber homo" to use the words of Magna Charta, 
 was protected, encouraged, and controlled by the
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 43 
 
 operation of printed laws, and tried by juries com- 
 posed of his neighbours in open court, on the halls 
 of which was inscribed Patet omnibus. 
 
 Then all was vigor, animation, and industry. Rich- 
 es and glory flowed into Britain from every quarter 
 of the globe. 
 
 " Gods ! what a golden scene was this, 
 Of public fame and private bliss." * 
 
 From this general view of things, we can form 
 some idea of the rare talents, and extraordinary mer- 
 it of Mr. Pitt, which raised him in the view of a 
 grateful people to the highest pinnacle of popularity 
 at home, and fame abroad. Such was the state of 
 things when the old King died. The condition of 
 affairs was changed after his grandson reigned in his 
 stead. The first object seemed to be (he destruc- 
 tion of Mr. Pitt's great influence. In the defamatory 
 publications of the day (and they were beyond all 
 example numerous), the illustrious minister, and 
 all the old whigs, were sneeringly styled " Republi- 
 cans" an unpleasant denomination in a monarchy. 
 The press teemed with the lowest abuse. His life, 
 public and private, was sifted with a sort of diabolical 
 malignity. The successes of his administration were 
 depreciated, his few faults monstrously exaggerated ; 
 and this at a time when Mr. Burke said of him, — 
 " He revived the military genius of our people ; he 
 supported our allies ; he extended our trade ; he 
 raised our reputation ; he augmented our dominions ; 
 and on his departure from administration, left the 
 nation in no other danger than that which ever must 
 
 * Ode by E. Seymour Esq., M, P
 
 44 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 attend exorbitant power, and the temptation which 
 may be to the invidious exertion of it. Happy- 
 had it been for him, for his sovereign;, and his country, 
 if a temper less austere, and a disposition more prac- 
 ticable, more compliant and conciliating, had been 
 joined to his other great virtues." * 
 
 Thus expatiates the copious Burke, without stop- 
 ping to consider, that he would have been no longer 
 the great William Pitt. "The want of 'these qual- 
 ities," adds the same writer, " disabled him from act- 
 ing any otherwise than alone. It prevented our enjoy- 
 ing the joint fruit of the wisdom of many able men, 
 who might mutually have tempered, and mutually 
 forwarded each other ; and finally, which was not 
 the meanest loss, it deprived us [the Rockingham 
 party] of his own immediate services." 
 
 On which we would remark, that nature cre- 
 ates monarchs even in the brute creation. Among 
 birds, the eagle acts alone, while doves crowd to- 
 gether in flocks. Among quadrupeds, the lion acts 
 alone, while sheep congregate, like doves, from con- 
 scious weakness. 
 
 While this baleful influence was operating in En- 
 gland upon that class of the community which in- 
 cludes the voters, and comprehends their representa- 
 tives, hypocrisy was preaching to the young monarch 
 against the antichristian practice of war, depicting 
 the horrors of its multiform cruelties, and contrasting 
 the barbarous custom with the evangelical spirit of 
 peace. The archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Seeker, 
 was so far taken in by the then fashionable court- 
 
 * Annual Register for 1761, p. 47.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 45 
 
 cant, that he, good man, exulting in the pious dispo- 
 sition of the young " defender of the faith," visited 
 him very often, and, for a considerable time, really 
 believed that he should become his most influential 
 counsellor, if not spiritual director. At court, you 
 would have thought that the Princess Dowager of 
 Wales, Lord Bute, the Dukes of Bedford and of 
 Newcastle, Lords Granville, Sandwich, and Barring- 
 ton, Bub Doddington, Charles Jenkinson,* and Jerry 
 Dyson were not far from the threshold of the tab- 
 ernacle. We dare not add to these, the name of 
 Henry Fox, that " piece of pure and distinguished 
 virtue," lest the reader should suspect that the whole 
 we have said is mere romance. It is true, howev- 
 er, that this old friend and schoolfellow of Pitt, was 
 at that time devoted to Lord Bute ; but was of a 
 character that disdained even the appearance of re- 
 ligion. Whether so or not, they certainly rendered 
 that sort of talk fashionable at court. It caught in 
 subordinate circles, and the contagion spread to suc- 
 cessive ones, until it met the inferior distant echoes 
 of the bribed electors, and the abused multitude ; 
 and thus, from an imported taint, the whole lump 
 became leavened, fit for the plastic hand of the sec- 
 ond-sighted chief juggler. 
 
 Mr. Pitt saw, and clearly understood all these 
 movements, and had a perfect idea of the construc- 
 tion and principles of their most powerful engines, 
 and retired from them with a dignity, disinterested- 
 ness, and purity of character, which cast, by the con- 
 
 * Mr. Jenkinson was Private Secretary to Lord Bute, known of late 
 years by the title of Lord Liverpool.
 
 46 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 trast, a deep shade upon that of the very rich Sir 
 Robert Walpole. It is very difficult to conceive how 
 the King could have done otherwise than make 
 Pitt a peer. Some have said that it was cunningly 
 and mischievously done to destroy his popularity. 
 If so, it was doing a very natural and indeed an una- 
 voidable thing ; and if it had in any degree that effect, 
 the great man might have said in the words of his 
 admired author, — " If these things be necessities, 
 let's meet them like necessities;" he did so.* 
 
 * " Clxrysal, or the Adventures of a Guinea" written by Charles 
 Johnstone, a satirical publication in 1760, and announced as " a dispas- 
 sionate distinct account of the most remarkable transactions of the 
 present times all over Europe." In this popular work, though there be 
 now and then ideal touches beyond the simple truth of character, yet 
 every anecdote has its foundation in truth. Facts have here only the 
 thin drapery of romance. See, to our purpose, the dialogue between 
 the Jew broker, Aminadab, and Van Hogen, the grand pensioner of 
 Holland, who, inveighing bitterly against the English, threatened to de- 
 clare war. The wary Jew, just come over from England, where he had 
 long resided, tells him — " Matters are now changed. We have got a 
 manager, who neither drinks, nor games, nor keeps running horses, nor 
 whores, nor lives above his private fortune, and therefore has not such 
 pressing demands for money, as used to make our negotiations go on 
 so smoothly with others formerly. There is a perverseness of the 
 people in power at present.'''' Van Hogen. " Will they not take 
 money ? " Aminadab. " No, indeed ; nor does the boldest of us know 
 how to offer it with safety, it was rejected with such indignant rage 
 the last time. I have seen the day, and that not very long since, 
 when half the sum would have done twice as much. Matters have 
 strangely altered of late." Van Hogen. " What shall we do ? Is the 
 whole court corrupted by his example ? Are they all infected with 
 such a strange madness ? " Aminadab. " No, it is not gone so far as 
 that yet ; and it is to be hoped that the example of a few will not be 
 able to do so much ; and that when the novelty of this humor wears off 
 a little, it will go out of fashion insensibly, and things return to their 
 old course. This is supposing the worst, that the engines now at 
 work to overturn this new set, should miscarry." 
 
 It may be said, — Why cite a professed satirist in an historical work ? 
 We reply, — Why quote Juvenal or Swift ?
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 47 
 
 We behold him now Earl of Chatham, into 
 which title he sunk, as some thought, the great 
 name of William Pitt. But the voice of evanes- 
 cent public opinion is not the voice of History. We 
 in this New World, or, to speak with precision, in 
 these United States, have but an imperfect idea of 
 the venality of administrations in certain kingdoms in 
 Europe. Contending parties and angry debaters 
 here talk of corruption where it never existed. It 
 reigned and triumphed during a greater part of the 
 life of George the Second ; and although Lord 
 Chatham called for and expended vast sums of 
 money, he never enriched himself or friends. It was 
 all for the nation, for the increase of its power, 
 glory, and example. 
 
 Although Chatham nobly led, all his old friends did 
 not follow. Not a few of the opposition or minority 
 did worse than hesitate ; for after Lords Chatham, 
 Temple, and Rockingham recoiled from the influence 
 of Lord Bute and his associates, the opposition 
 showed how much their patriotism was worth. To 
 show the value of it, we cite a paragraph from " The 
 History of the Minority, during the Years 1762-'3-'4 
 and '5." " A point so highly interesting to the sub- 
 ject (as general warrants) a true patriot would not 
 have suffered to remain unnoticed. But the fact is, 
 the minority had neither true patriotism, true virtue, 
 nor common honesty ; for they now showed themselves 
 to be hypocrites to the cause, impostors upon the 
 public, and traitors to each other. No party ever 
 was so truly contemptible in such a very short time.
 
 48 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 "It soon became obvious to all mankind, that the 
 sole purpose of this sham pursuit of liberty was the 
 possession of lucrative offices. Lord Chatham, see- 
 ing of what stuff they were made, kept aloof. He 
 did not attend Parliament during the whole session. 
 Lord Temple declared to the Duke of Newcastle 
 and others of the party, that if the only end proposed 
 by opposition, was, singly and exclusively, the pos- 
 session of the great offices, for the sake of the sala- 
 ries of them ; if nothing was intended for the public ; 
 and if they would neither propose nor support any 
 motion or measure, for the true security of liberty, and 
 the real advantage of the people, he would not lend 
 himself as a cover to any such principles." * Op- 
 position was now entirely at an end. The venal part 
 of the minority found themselves detected. Those 
 colors under which they nattered themselves their 
 designs would have been concealed, were now with- 
 drawn ; and they appeared like a fugitive corps, with- 
 out clothing, arms, or officers. For some time they 
 wandered in this desolate and disconsolate plight ; 
 and at length finding that no party would accept of 
 them, they became quite broken-hearted, and in a 
 short time were almost totally dispersed. 
 
 " Such was the fate of the late minority : a party 
 which had been originally formed for the best and 
 most laudable purposes, namely, to resist the powers 
 and measures of a mischievous favorite ; and when 
 he had been defeated, to defend the constitution and 
 the liberties of the subject, by opposing and censuring 
 all arbitrary violations of ministers. These w r ere the 
 
 * History of the Minority, chap. xxi.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 49 
 
 objects of opposition. The first was in part ac- 
 complished by the North Briton. But out of that 
 victory arose the second, which was scandalously de- 
 serted by the body of the party ; who, acting wholly 
 upon the temporizing principle of making their peace 
 at St. James's as soon as possible, in order to lose 
 no opportunity of getting into office, were never in 
 earnest in the cause of liberty, and were continually 
 checking every measure, and betraying every man 
 who obstructed their selfish and interested views. 
 No party had ever such admirable ground to go upon ; 
 and had the men been but half as good as the cause, 
 no administration, however supported, could have 
 withstood them. The influence of the favorite, to- 
 gether with the whole fabric of his system, must have 
 been destroyed for ever." * 
 
 That Pitt richly merited the highest honors a king 
 of Great Britain could bestow, few can doubt who 
 duly consider the life, conduct, and extraordinary 
 character of that great man. Yet his acceptance of 
 a peerage with a corresponding pension was cried 
 out against as a flagrant desertion of the people's 
 cause, and abandonment of his former principles:. 
 Those who were called Lord Bute's hireling writers 
 took advantage of it, and heaped abuse upon the new- 
 made peer with a view to destroy his popularity. A 
 number of these were employed, at a very great ex- 
 pense, to beat down the towering spirit of the great 
 orator and patriot. But the abuse was not confined 
 wholly to them. Some envious peers as well as 
 
 * History of the Minority, chap. xxi. 4th edition. London, 1?<;<i. 
 
 7
 
 50 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 commoners were far from discountenancing the ef- 
 fort for reducing Lord Chatham to a level with 
 themselves. A strong impediment to these designs 
 was the existence of a small but nobly patriotic 
 band in Parliament, men of great w r eight of char- 
 acter, such as Temple, Rockingham, Camden, and 
 Burke. Yet the young, inexperienced, and ill-advised 
 monarch took the resolution to remove this obstacle, 
 and, with that view, actually ventured to dissolve the 
 great council of the nation in the year 1761. 
 
 From that inauspicious day, George the Third 
 might date the commencement of his unhappiness, 
 and Great Britain her manifold disasters ; some of 
 which she yet feels and deplores, while we Ameri- 
 cans, since separated from her, have no reason to 
 bewail the event, seeing it led to our independence. 
 
 A new Parliament was about convening. A few 
 weeks before it met, foreign agents, and certain 
 British sub-agents, were busily employed in preparing 
 for the purchase of peace from England. The 
 ground had been prepared before the seed arrived ; 
 and the rich Duke of Bedford was about embarking 
 for France, as Lord Bute's representative, while the 
 bulk of the nation were very far from being tired of 
 the war, as success followed the British colors in 
 every quarter of the world. 
 
 The first manifestation of the tainted condition of 
 things was discernible at Head-Quarters, in doubling 
 the number of attendants and servants at the pal- 
 ace, and in multiplying donatives beyond all former 
 example.* Twenty-five thousand pounds were is- 
 
 * A member of Parliament was, at that time, a turnspit in the king's 
 kitchen. We assert it on the authority of Mr. Burke.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 5 \ 
 
 sued in one day in bank notes of one hundred 
 pounds each, when the only stipulation was — " Give 
 us your vote" Loyal addresses from various quar- 
 ters were presented to the King, thanking him for his 
 gracious efforts to make peace with France and 
 Spain. One from the venerable University of Oxford 
 tells his Majesty that " he was ordained, by the pe- 
 culiar favor of Providence, to repair the ruins and 
 ravages of a destructive war." As if England was 
 madly rushing to ruin, by her uninterrupted victories 
 over the forces of the united powers of the House 
 of Bourbon. Hence the necessity of an immediate 
 peace with a prostrate enemy ! 
 
 We are informed from respectable authority, that 
 " the addresses to the King, which followed the 
 parliamentary approbation of the preliminary articles 
 of peace, were obtained by means equally dishonor- 
 able and corrupt. There was one instance where 
 the seal of a corporation was forged, and more than 
 one where it was feloniously obtained." * Lord Bute* 
 tampered with the city, which refused to address 
 although the sum of fourteen thousand pounds was 
 offered to complete Black Friars' bridge. This offer 
 they disdained, and after finishing it themselves, they 
 dedicated that noble structure to the Earl of Chat- 
 ham, by an highly complimentary inscription. The 
 authority just cited informs us that " no means were 
 left untried every w r here to obtain addresses. The 
 Lord-Lieutenants had begging letters sent them to 
 use their influence, and live hundred pounds secret 
 service-money were added to each letter. The 
 
 * Anecdotes of the Earl of Chatham
 
 52 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 sum of five hundred pounds was the notorious price 
 of an address. Some addresses cost a much larger 
 sum, according to the importance and magnitude of 
 the place from which the address was obtained." It 
 was remarked that during the time Lord Bute held 
 his public situation as prime minister, no favorite ex- 
 ercised the power of the crown with more insolence. 
 Can imagination conceive any thing more irritating, 
 more enraging to such a lofty spirit as that of Chat- 
 ham, than seeing the work of his glorious life, the re- 
 sult of his matchless labors, pulled down before his 
 eyes, by an infamous and inadequate peace ; the 
 solid pyramid of his fame dilapidated, not by the 
 chance or fortune of war, but deliberately, and its 
 materials sold to Frenchmen, Spaniards, and people 
 nearer home ? 
 
 However, we search in vain for the clear, uncon- 
 taminated history of those dark transactions, in the 
 unbroken series of cause and effect The English, 
 with all their boasted freedom of the press, dare not 
 publish the whole truth respecting their Kings, 
 Queens, and Princesses.* The best histories of Rome 
 were not written by natives of " the Eternal City." 
 As it regards England, we pick the truth up here 
 and there from anecdotes, memoirs, daily and 
 
 * Whoever wishes to be more particularly informed, let him read 
 the examination of Dr. Musgrave at the bar of the House of Commons 
 in 1762, and let him notice the words of Sir William Blackstone in the 
 course of that examination, as recorded in the twenty-second chapter, 
 volume first, of the Anecdotes and Speeches of the Earl of Chatham, 
 the seventh edition, corrected, London, 1810 ; which, though anonymous, 
 was evidently published from the first under the sanction of the Pitt 
 and Grenville family, and made, in a manner, the basis of Thackeray's 
 Life of Lord Chatham.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 53 
 
 weekly publications, such being, in the opinion of 
 the great Lord Somers, the most faithful pictures 
 of " the bent and genius of the age, the sense of 
 parties, and sometimes the voice of the nation." 
 Boast not, Englishmen, of your liberty of the press, 
 while you have such partial histories as those of 
 Lord Clarendon, David Hume, and the Annual Reg- 
 ister, though conducted by Edmund Burke, that 
 very able and intrepid son of liberty.* If you com- 
 pare the few first-rate British histories and annals 
 with the memoirs of some of their eminent men who 
 had directed them to be buried till thirty years after 
 their decease, — time enough for their children and 
 probably grandchildren to be out of the reach of re- 
 sentment, you will learn the truth of our assertion. 
 We predict, however, that some bold and persevering 
 
 * A very valuable and impartial history of the American Revolution 
 was written by the Rev. William Gordon, D. D., an Englishman ; who 
 resided about twelve years in Massachusetts, and had access to the 
 best authorities, including that of Washington, Greene, Knox, and 
 Gates, and the journals of Congress and of the Legislatures of the sev- 
 eral States. He injudiciously returned to England, there to print his 
 interesting history. He deemed it prudent to submit his manuscript to 
 a gentleman learned in the law, to mark such chapters and passages as 
 might endanger prosecution, when the lawyer returned it with such a 
 large portion expurgated as to reduce about four volumes to three. 
 The author being too aged and too infirm to venture upon a voyage 
 back to America, and too poor withal, he submitted to its publica- 
 tion in a mutilated state; and thus the most just and impartial history 
 of the American war, and of the steps that led to it, on both sides of 
 the Atlantic, was sadly marred, and shamefully mutilated. My author- 
 ity is from my late venerable friend John Adams, the President of 
 these United States, who perused Gordon's manuscript when he was 
 our Minister at the Court of London, and from my own knowledge, 
 having been shown a considerable portion of the History before the au- 
 thor left this country to die in his own, and having corresponded with 
 him till near the close of his long life.
 
 54 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 searcher on that or this side the Atlantic will find 
 pearls, and diamonds, and precious stones in the dirt, 
 and string them together and therewith make a chaplet 
 for the brow of Truth. The author of the work 
 we have so often commended says, — " There is such 
 a delicacy prevails in England, greater than in some 
 arbitrary monarchies, concerning the conduct of the 
 Royal Family, that truth of them is usually suppress- 
 ed until it is forgotten. The justice of history is 
 thereby perverted ; and the constitution, in this im- 
 portant point, is literally and efficiently destroyed." * 
 Even the very bold and prophet-like Junius when he 
 addresses his Sovereign in the firm but honest lan- 
 guage of reprehension, does it in the studied style of 
 respect. You see throughout his famous letter, the 
 enthroned King, and the conscientious, presaging 
 Magus of a subject, but void of that indelicate, sa- 
 cerdotal objurgation used by certain French preachers 
 to their monarchs. 
 
 When Lord Chatham resigned, the Earl of Egre- 
 mont took his place ; a nobleman well suited to the 
 views of the Earl of Bute. On the sudden death of 
 Egremont, Lord Bute came in Prime Minister almost 
 of course. When these changes took place, I well 
 remember the unfavorable impression it made re- 
 specting the real character of the young monarch 
 in these New England colonies. It excited doubts 
 of his wisdom, and created suspicions of his ultimate 
 views, as Pitt was a personage almost worshipped in 
 America. 
 
 When Pitt retired from office he was comparative- 
 ly poor. But when Bute was finally constrained to 
 
 * Anecdotes of Lord Chatham.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 55 
 
 retire, he was very rich. The question at that 
 time among the people was, — Where did his riches 
 come from? Peace, be still! Honor and.increas-. 
 ing fame followed Chatham ; suspicions and bitter 
 execrations accompanied Bute, — whether right or 
 wrong, whether just or unjust, we pretend not to 
 decide. The dark cave of favoritism affords us, dis- 
 tant and inexperienced republicans, but little light. 
 It really does not appear that Lord Bute was a very 
 bad man, with a heart corrupted by the love of 
 money, and intoxicated by the splendors of high sta- 
 tion, or that he had a great desire to enrich his 
 children, whom he always kept at a great and chil- 
 ling distance. 
 
 Lord Bute appears to have been a man better 
 fitted by nature, education, and habit for President 
 of the Royal Society than Prime Minister of Great 
 Britain. He had an extraordinary appearance of 
 wisdom in his looks and manner of speaking ; 
 whether the subject were serious or trifling, he was 
 equally pompous, slow, and sententious. His deliv- 
 ery in Parliament was so very slow, solemn, and mo- 
 notonous, that when the brilliant Charles Townsend 
 heard him the first time in the House of Lords, he 
 exclaimed — Minute Guns ! From all which it may 
 be inferred that the Earl of Bute was one of those 
 characters spoken of by Lord Bacon, who are con- 
 stantly upon the stretch to make superficies appear 
 solids.* 
 
 * It has been said of Lord Bute, that " He was reserved, inward, 
 and darksome. Clandestine without concealment, sad without sor- 
 row, domestic without familiarity, haughty without elevation ; nothing-
 
 56 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 Directly on Lord Bute's being made commissioner 
 of the treasury, in 1762, came out the first number of 
 the Briton, written by Dr. Smollet, praising his Lord- 
 ship to the skies, with occasional sarcasms and sly 
 
 great, nothing noble having ever marked his character, or illustrated 
 his conduct in public or private life. Reducing every thing to his own 
 ideas, that standard of littleness, that mint of falsity. A frigid friend, 
 a mean enemy. Stubborn without firmness, and ambitious without 
 spirit. Ungenerous without any very extraordinary note of avarice ; 
 but rather so through the poverty of head and heart. Bookish without 
 learning ; as insensible and unconversable on the great subjects of lite- 
 rature, as one deaf and dumb when questioned on a concert of music, 
 A dabbler in the fine arts without grace or taste. A traveller through 
 countries without seeing them, and totally unacquainted with his own. 
 In a dull ungenial solitude, muddling away what leisure he may have 
 from false politics and ruinous counsels, in stuffing his port-folios with 
 penny prints and pretty pictures of colored simples, those gazing- 
 traps of simpletons, and garnishing his knicknackatory with mechanical 
 toys, baubles, and gimcracks, or varying his nonsense with little 
 tricks of chemistry ; while all these futile puerilities have been rendered 
 still more futile by the gloom of a solemn visage, ridiculously exhibiting 
 the preternatural character of a grave child. Bagatelles these, which 
 it would doubtless be impertinent, illiberal, and even uncharitable to 
 mention, were it not for the apprehension of his having inspired this 
 most unroyal taste for trifles where it could not exist, but at the ex- 
 pense of a time and attention, of which the nation could not be robbed 
 without capital detriment to it ; a circumstance this, that must draw 
 down a ridicule upon his master, not to be easily shaken off, and as 
 much more hurtful to a prince than a calumny of a graver nature, as 
 contempt is ever more fatal to government than even fear or hatred. 
 [The readers of the malapert Peter Pindar can best judge of this.] 
 Too unhappily, alas ! for this nation, chance had thrown this egregious 
 trifler into a family [that of Frederic, Prince of Wales,] whom his do- 
 mestic streights had favorably disposed towards him. How he main- 
 tained and unproved his footing into a pernicious ascendant, is surely 
 beneath curiosity. 
 
 " As to the royal pupil, who by a much misplaced confidence, fell 
 under his management at the tender age of susceptibility of all im- 
 pressions, it was not well possible for him to prevent a deep-rooted 
 partiality for a choice manifestly not made by him, but for him. In raw,
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 57 
 
 reflections on the late King, and copious abuse of 
 Mr. Pitt. This was soon followed by the celebrated 
 North Briton, written by several hands. This sar- 
 castic production attacked not only Lord Bute, but 
 the King's mother, with low abuse of the Scotch as 
 
 inexperienced, unguarded youth, practised upon by an insidious study 
 of his inclinations, not to rectify, but to govern him by them ; captivated 
 by an unremitting attention to humor and perpetuate the natural bent 
 of that age to the lighter objects of amusement ; instituted to an im- 
 plicit faith in the man who littered his head with trifles, and, unable to 
 corrupt his heart, only hardened it like his own against the remonstran- 
 ces of true greatness, while warping his understanding with the falsest 
 notions of men and things, and especially of maxims of state, of which 
 himself never had so much as an elementary idea ; thus delivered up to 
 such a tutor, how could the disciple possibly escape such a combination ? 
 What of essentially wise or magnanimous could he learn from such a 
 pedlar in politics and manners ? No one can impart what himself 
 never had. Honor, gratitude, dignity of sentiment, energy of sincerity, 
 comprehensiveness of views, were not in him to inculcate. Obstinacy 
 under the stale disguise of firmness, the royalty of repairing wrong by 
 persisting in it, the plausible decencies of private life, the petty morali- 
 ties, the minutenesses of public arrangements; the preference of dark 
 juggle, mystery, and low artifice, to the frank, open spirit of govern- 
 ment ; the abundant sufficiency of the absence of great vices, to atone 
 for the want of great virtues ; a contempt of reputation, and especially 
 that execrable absurdity in the Sovereign of a free people, the neglect of 
 popularity, were all that the hapless pupil could possibly learn from 
 such a preceptor." — " All prejudice then apart, mark in him, to his 
 Prince a tutor without knowledge, a minister without ability, a favorite 
 without gratitude ; the very anti-genius of politics ; the curse of 
 Scotland ; the disgrace of his master ; the despair of the nation ; and 
 the disdain of history." * 
 
 This portrait, painted with Dutch exactness, feature by feature, 
 without the least caricature, explains what long puzzled me, namely, 
 the silence of Junius, and of Lord Chatham in regard to Bute. 
 They doubtless considered him beneath the dignity of history or ora- 
 tory. Thus animals escape the hunter because they are not worth the 
 powder and shot. 
 
 When Lord Bute became Prime Minister, the Scotch, generally, 
 were elated beyond expression. The Jacobites all flocked to court, 
 
 * See a note in vol. I. chap. xxiv. of Anecdotes and Speeches of the Earl of Chatham. 
 
 8
 
 58 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 a people. Its fire was so intense and well directed 
 to its object, that it soon demolished the slight works 
 of the Briton, whose fierce antagonist held on its 
 way rejoicing until it attained its 45th number, when 
 it was checked by a prosecution. The author of 
 this far-famed number w r as found to be Colonel John 
 Wilkes, an English gentleman, of a character not 
 easily described nor readily understood by the citi- 
 zens of our young Republic, as we are yet republicans 
 of the ancient Roman stamp, while the luxurious 
 Englishmen in the blaze of fashion, are Corinthians. 
 The personages more particularly aggrieved by the 
 satirical North Briton were blinded by a rage which 
 was rather of a feminine than of a masculine char- 
 acter, and which precipitated them into several very 
 serious errors and many consequent mortifications. 
 The first steps in the prosecution of Wilkes were 
 illegal, the subsequent ones imprudent, and the whole 
 procedure, from beginning to end, undignified. This 
 irregular procedure, being exposed and exaggerated 
 by the opposition in their new Parliament, threw the 
 whole country into a flame, and afforded to the 
 whole w r orld (with the exception of these thirteen 
 colonies) an astonishing instance of the power of the 
 people, when the executive part of the government 
 oversteps the sacred boundaries of the constitution. 
 Through the medium of the press and the speeches 
 in Parliament, the people were made to understand 
 the question, and they took John Wilkes under their 
 
 overjoyed to see a Stuart so near the throne. Previously to forming a 
 Tory administration, the Favorite dismissed that excellent minister Mr. 
 Legge, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the greatly esteemed friend 
 of Lord Chatham. Junius speaks of his dismissal in terms of disgust.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 59 
 
 protection ; in which, if not applauded, they were not 
 discouraged by characters of the highest rank of sub- 
 jects. This, taken altogether, at length constituted 
 that sort of adoption which astonished all Europe, 
 and occasioned even the democrats of New Eng- 
 land to stare at each other with amazement ; for 
 Wilkes had but little weight of moral character, 
 was not gifted with mental talents of the first class, 
 and was void of the chief powers of oratory. But 
 then his abilities were respectable, his courage un- 
 daunted, his perseverance surprising, and his gen- 
 tlemanlike good-humor exhaustless. 
 
 While the people and their leaders were magnify- 
 ing this favored child of fortune, the populace were 
 taught to believe that the learned Lord Mansfield, 
 who sat at the head of the judiciary, was an officer 
 dangerous from his arbitrary principles and alleged 
 entire subserviency to the crown ; and that his ele- 
 vated countryman, Lord Bute, was in conspiration 
 fast destroying the liberties of England. We pre- 
 tend not — we presume not to weigh such a vir 
 ponderosus as William Murray, Lord Mansfield. I 
 saw the ruins of his habitation, with sorrow and in- 
 dignation on a second exacerbation of popular de- 
 lirium, in 1780. 
 
 In the year 1768 the capital of the British Empire 
 exhibited a singular spectacle. Our countryman, 
 Dr. Franklin, says of it, in a letter dated London, 
 April 1768, to his son in America, " It is really ex- 
 traordinary to see an outlaw, an exile,* of bad per- 
 sonal character, not worth a farthing, coming over 
 
 * When prosecuted for his libellous No. 45, Wilkes fled to France.
 
 gO PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 from France, set himself up as a candidate for the 
 capital of the kingdom, miss election only by being 
 too late in his application ; and immediately carry it 
 for the principal county, [Middlesex, which includes 
 London.] The mob, spirited up by numbers of 
 different ballads sung or roared in every street, and 
 requiring gentlemen and ladies of all ranks, as they 
 passed in their carriages, to shout Wilkes and Liber- 
 ty ! marking the same words on all their coaches 
 with chalk, and the number 45; and on every door 
 in London, and for more than fifty miles in the 
 country ! " 
 
 In the following month, May 1768, the Doctor 
 again writes, — " Even this capital, the residence of the 
 King, is now a daily scene of lawless riot and con- 
 fusion ; mobs patrolling the streets at noonday ; 
 some knocking all down that will not roar out Wilkes 
 and Liberty ; courts of justice afraid to give judg- 
 ment against him ; coal-heavers and porters pulling 
 down the houses of coal-merchants, that refuse to 
 give them more wages ; sailors unrigging all outward 
 bound ships, and suffering none to sail till merchants 
 agreed to raise their pay ; watermen destroying 
 private boats, and threatening bridges, [and this 
 under the guns of the tower ;] soldiers firing among 
 the mobs and killing men, women, and children." — 
 " The scenes have been horrible. London was 
 illuminated two nights running at the command of 
 the mob, for the success of Wilkes in the Middlesex 
 election. The second night exceeded any thing of 
 the kind ever seen here. Those who refused to 
 illuminate had their windows destroyed."
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 61 
 
 These outrages in London described by Dr. Frank- 
 lin,* exceeded, far exceeded any riot that ever 
 occurred in these North American Colonies. The 
 destruction of the King's vessel, the Gaspee, at 
 Rhode Island in 1772; the wasting the cargoes of 
 Tea in Boston harbour, to prevent its landing, and 
 of course obviating an inextricable difficulty, were 
 conducted with regularity, order, stillness, and marks 
 of deliberation, more like the service of a detachment 
 of marines than the acts of a mob. Compare the ter- 
 rific conflagrations, in what were called Lord George 
 Gordon's mobs, when they destroyed Lord Mans- 
 field's house, library, and manuscripts, with the 
 destruction of the furniture of Governor Hutchinson 
 in Boston, and a few others in America, and we 
 need not blush for our popular character when con- 
 trasted with that of the London populace in 1780.f 
 
 In those tumultuary times in England, the throne 
 itself was not assailed as in the case of Charles the 
 First, and since in France. The discontent arose 
 
 * See his Memoirs. 
 
 f During the revolutionary period, not a single individual lost life 
 or limb by a mob, nor did any one suffer death in any of the New 
 England Colonies or States for his political sentiments. The ludicrous 
 mob-punishment of tar and feathers, so greatly misrepresented, was 
 perpetrated on certain informers against the smugglers, and on them 
 alone ; and these by sailors and their associates, all of that class of 
 people. In the midst of high popular excitement, while Boston was a 
 British garrison, a British captain and a guard of his soldiers, on duty 
 at the Custom House, were attacked by a gang of young persons, first 
 with snow-balls and then with bits of ice, when the soldiers fired, and 
 killed and wounded several who were not in the affray. Instead of 
 being instantly massacred, they were tried by a Boston jury, by men 
 who considered the Britisli soldiers as so many locusts sent to destroy 
 them, and acquitted, as acting in self-defence and upon duty. This 
 precious anecdote speaks volumes in the ear of candor.
 
 62 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 from a disregard to the English constitution. When 
 the Princess Dowager of Wales came to England, 
 she found the British Sovereign a very different 
 character, and the court of St. James a very different 
 coterie from that in which she had been educated at 
 Saxe-Gotha. She saw that George the Second was 
 controlled by his ministers, and compelled to submit 
 to their opinions on all important subjects. The 
 comparison disgusted her, and she resolved to make 
 the court of her husband, or of her son, should he 
 attain the crown, as near like that of her father as 
 possible. She strove to make the court of London 
 like the miniature court of Saxe-Gotha. 
 
 Fool that I was to think imperial Rome 
 Like Mantua ! * 
 
 There was no wish to change the form of the 
 government, nor to encroach on the legal preroga- 
 tives of the crown as established at the revolution ; 
 but there was an extreme jealousy and discontent 
 arising from occurrences in the administration of it. 
 The public had been greatly disappointed. They 
 expected more from their young, inexperienced King, 
 than such a man with such an education could possi- 
 bly perform. Had he been a King John, or a Harry 
 the Eighth, the spirit of the times would have reme- 
 died the evil at once. But the Third George was a 
 moral man. After the strictest sect of his religion, 
 he lived a Pharisee ; and therefore respectable in 
 the eyes of his two Universities and of the holy 
 catholic church, with a constitutional abhorrence of 
 
 * Urbem quam dicunt Romam, Meliboge, putavi 
 Stultus ego huic nostree similem. Virg.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. (53 
 
 popery bordering on bigotry. In every thing, even 
 in religion, he was a staunch churchman, stubborn 
 as a rock ; yet, though slow and cold in toleration, he 
 never countenanced persecution. 
 
 At the distance of three thousand miles of clear 
 ocean, objects in Britain seem to us, through our 
 camera obscnra, different from what they appear to 
 those islanders themselves. At the time spoken of, 
 we were a part of the same realm ; a very loyal 
 people, magnifying the good, and feeling none of the 
 evil complained of in England. We felt no great 
 solicitude or interest in the admission, or expulsion 
 of John Wilkes from their parliament. Yet we saw 
 with surprise the change of sentiment respecting 
 the King and his court. If any one will take the 
 pains to read the elaborate accounts of the corona- 
 tion and the nuptial ceremonies of King George the 
 Third with a German Princess, in the year 1761, 
 and notice the almost adoration expressed of those 
 exalted personages ; and mark with what pride and 
 rapture the minute details of those gorgeous cere- 
 monies were received, relished, and prolonged by 
 the people of London ; and contrast them with the 
 state of affairs, and with the feelings of the same 
 people a few years afterwards, he will perceive an 
 altered state of things, and a great change in the 
 public sentiment, without waiting for us to express it 
 in words. We would only remark, that if we com- 
 pare the general sentiment of the British nation 
 during the three last years of George the Second, 
 when Pitt was at the helm of state, with that of his 
 grandson, under the management of Lord Bute, we
 
 g4 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 shall hardly feel surprise that, even in these far distant 
 colonies, the character of the young monarch was 
 shaken and manifestly impaired by the circumstan- 
 ces of the peace. We grieved to see some of 
 the most valuable islands in the West Indies that 
 were conquered from France and Spain, restored to 
 them. We rejoiced with wonder on finding that 
 Canada was retained, while the island of Cuba, that 
 Great Britain of the Western world, was given up 
 to the conquered. But the Earl of Chatham was 
 not consulted on the articles of peace ; and they 
 who made it, considered only their present advantage. 
 If very many people in England have confounded 
 John Wilkes, with his cause, it is no great wonder 
 that we in America have not always separated them. 
 It comports with our design to speak in a cursory 
 manner of both in this place ; and more particularly 
 hereafter. He was a man who had not quite moral 
 character enough to excite great esteem and respect, 
 yet sufficient talent and education, honor and manners, 
 to make him an object of fear and great force in the 
 hands of the powerful whig-party which upheld him. 
 His was that mixed and middle character which civil 
 revolutions call for. In that tumultuary condition of 
 affairs, in the early part of the reign of George the 
 Third, John Wilkes was made the principal figure. 
 There is yet another reason for introducing him to 
 our readers, I mean the intercourse between him 
 and the great Unknown, the terrific Junius, who 
 wrote to him several private letters, which I myself 
 consider equal to any thing that has fallen from the 
 pen of Junius; — not in polish or in the flowers of 
 
 • 
 
 •
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. (J5 
 
 rhetoric, but in depth of thought, knowledge of the 
 human heart, and w r onderful tact in the management 
 of a froward character, which we believe did not 
 appertain to any two men of that day. We shall 
 speak of this political meteor hereafter, and occa- 
 sionally ; and shall only remark now, that the saga- 
 cious Junius enlisted him into his service. He 
 considered him the very man whom the able and in- 
 trepid band of whigs needed to co-operate with them 
 in exorcizing the evil spirit behind the throne. To 
 cover the here and there dark spots in the private, 
 rakish character of the spirited Wilkes, they con- 
 spired with the times to inflate him to a size and 
 shape that was frightful to the court, astonishing to 
 the world, and must have been, now and then, laugh- 
 able to himself. The English people, who, in point 
 of national character, stand between the French and 
 the Dutch, were taught to believe, that John Wilkes 
 was the devoted and sworn champion of their dear- 
 est rights and privileges ; that he and they would 
 sink or swim together; and that he was prose- 
 cuted and then persecuted by the crown, in a great 
 measure, on their account. They were wrought up 
 to a firm belief that their danger originated from the 
 remaining foreign leaven of the Leicester-House 
 secret and irresponsible cabinet, then fermenting in 
 the new court of their inexperienced and deluded 
 King. Under these impressions and apprehensions, 
 their resentment became terrible, and produced the 
 riots we have already mentioned. The storm which 
 " the daemon of discord " had raised to drown this 
 idol of the people failed to overwhelm him. He 
 
 9
 
 66 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 floated conspicuously on the top of every wave, while 
 the monarch, his family, and " his friends " felt the 
 appalling force of the refluent one. Nor was this 
 the sole cause of the commotion. The thundering 
 voice from the press commenced its re-action ; and 
 had that champion of the malcontents possessed a pri- 
 vate and social character as pure as that of Mr. Pitt, 
 or Sir George Saville, he and his cause combined 
 might have gone far towards driving the native King, 
 in disgust, to his electoral dominions. But Wilkes 
 was of a strangely mixed character. If he somewhat 
 resembled Richardson's Lovelace, his conduct, now 
 and then, brings to our recollection the Roman 
 Regulus. He could feel, think, and act like a Spar- 
 tan general and, on the same day, like a rake. He 
 delighted to walk the streets of London in full dress, 
 and loved dearly greetings in the market-place. 
 Thus he united greatness of mind with a pitiful 
 vanity.* With the most insinuating address and as- 
 senting manners and speech, he united inflexible 
 bravery. Being a man of pleasure without fortune 
 to support it, he panted to rise above his station, and 
 resolved to make, some way or other, a conspicuous 
 figure ; and he succeeded, to admiration. 
 
 Mr. Wilkes had very favorable opportunities for 
 an excellent education, first in London, and after- 
 wards at Leyden, then in greater reputation among 
 
 * I had some personal knowledge of this champion of the people's 
 rights, having had letters of introduction to him in the year 1775, when 
 he was Lord Mayor of London. I went directly from Dr. Fothergill's 
 in Harpur Street to wait on his Lordship at the City Mansion-House. 
 What a contrast,— the simplex munditiis of the one, and the peacockism 
 of the other !
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 67 
 
 the Whigs than either Oxford or Cambridge, and 
 distinguished also about this time, as the scene of 
 education of the Honorable Charles Townsend, the 
 Duke of Richmond, Akenside, Dyson, and one of the 
 sons of Lord Bute, and several Russian and German 
 Princes. If in after life, as a man, he trod in the im- 
 pure and dangerous paths of pleasure with associates 
 beneath him, he entertained and heartily relished 
 sound constitutional principles as an Englishman, 
 which he maintained in a stern spirit of patriotism 
 equal, at times, to that of John Hampden. He ap- 
 peared an able writer, except when the productions 
 of his pen happened to be placed by the side of 
 those of his friend Junius, who spoke of Mr. Wilkes 
 to his Sovereign in the words following. 
 
 " Hitherto, Sir, you had been sacrificed to the 
 prejudices and passions of others. With what 
 firmness will you bear the mention of your own? 
 
 "A man, not very honorably distinguished in the 
 world, commences a formal attack upon your favor- 
 ite [Lord Bute], considering nothing but how he 
 might best expose his person and principles to de- 
 testation, and the national character of his country- 
 men to contempt. The natives of that country, Sir, 
 are as much distinguished by a peculiar character, as 
 by your Majesty's favor. Like anotherchosen people, 
 they have been conducted into the land of plenty, 
 where they find themselves effectually marked, and 
 divided from mankind. There is hardly a period at 
 which the most irregular character may not be redeem- 
 ed. The mistakes of one sex find a retreat in patrio- 
 tism ; those of the other, in devotion. Mr. Wilkes
 
 68 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 brought with him into politics the same liberal 
 sentiments by which his private conduct had been 
 directed, and seemed to think, that, as there are few 
 excesses in which an English gentleman may not be 
 permitted to indulge, the same latitude was allowed 
 him in the choice of his political principles, and in 
 the spirit of maintaining them. I mean to state, not 
 entirely to defend, his conduct. In the earnestness 
 of his zeal, he suffered some unwarrantable insinua- 
 tions to escape him. He said more than moderate 
 men would justify ; but not enough to entitle him to 
 the honor of your Majesty's personal resentment. 
 The rays of Royal indignation, collected upon him, 
 served only to illuminate, and could not consume. 
 Animated by the favor of the people on one side, 
 and heated by persecution on the other, his views 
 and sentiments changed with his situation. Hardly 
 serious at first, he is now an enthusiast. The cold- 
 est bodies warm with opposition, the hardest sparkle 
 in collision. There is a holy mistaken zeal in poli- 
 tics as well as religion. By persuading others we 
 convince ourselves. The passions are engaged, and 
 create a maternal affection in the mind, which forces 
 us to love the cause, for which we suffer. Is this a 
 contention worthy of a King 1 Are you not sensible 
 how much the meanness of the cause gives an air of 
 ridicule to the serious difficulties into which you 
 have been betrayed ? The destruction of one man 
 has been now, for many years, the sole object of 
 your government ; and if there can be any thing still 
 more disgraceful, we have seen, for such an object, 
 the utmost influence of the. executive power, and
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. QQ 
 
 every ministerial artifice, exerted without success. 
 Nor can you ever succeed, unless he should be im- 
 prudent enough to forfeit the protection of those 
 laws, to which you owe your crown, or unless your 
 ministers should persuade you to make it a question 
 of force alone, and try the whole strength of govern- 
 ment in opposition to the people. The lessons he 
 has received from experience, will probably guard 
 him from such excess of folly ; and in your Majesty's 
 virtues we find an unquestionable assurance that no 
 illegal violence will be attempted." — " Not contented 
 with making Mr. Wilkes a man of importance, they 
 [the ministers] have judiciously transferred the 
 question, from the rights and interests of one man, to 
 the most important rights and interests of the people, 
 and forced your subjects, from wishing well to the 
 cause of an individual, to unite with him in their 
 own" * 
 
 I can by no comment add weight to the passage 
 here cited. The whole address is momentous and 
 solemn. It comes like a heavy body falling from a 
 great height. What is there in the royal mind 
 that hardens the heart against impressions from on 
 high ? Moses and Aaron, though commissioned by 
 Heaven, could not correct its errors by words. Judg- 
 ments and plagues were the only remedies. Com- 
 pare the whole Letter of Junius to the King with 
 what occasionally fell from Lord Chatham in Parlia- 
 ment when speaking on the various subjects of it, 
 and you will perceive a unity of thought, an unani- 
 
 * Junius's Address to the King, 19 December, 17G9.
 
 70 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 mousness of opinion, much more to be regarded than 
 the sameness of phraseology. 
 
 We have seen England's wisest men discarded ; 
 and ignorance and presumption take their places, 
 in men notoriously incompetent to their stations. 
 That ship must be in danger which attempts the wide 
 and trackless ocean in the darkness of night and in a 
 gathering storm, with inexperienced officers and 
 crew. 
 
 What increased the embarrassments of the Kins: 
 and his new servants, was the discontented state of 
 these North American Colonies. They could not but 
 see dark and rolling clouds in the West forboding a 
 storm, engendered by a rash attempt to tax unrepre- 
 sented subjects at three thousand miles' distance. 
 Although George the Third had then an able and 
 honest minister, George Grenvilk, he soon found that 
 he must retrace his steps. Junius tells the tale, in 
 a very few words, and in his masterly manner, thus, 
 — '.' Under one administration the stamp-act is made ; 
 under the second it is repealed; under the third, in 
 spite of all experience, a new mode of taxing the 
 colonies is invented, and a question revived which 
 ought to have been buried in oblivion." * 
 
 At this time the experienced pilot, Chatham, had 
 retired to a distance from the capital, grievously tor- 
 mented with gout, complicated with "nervous" dis- 
 order. He seemed sinking under a heavy load of 
 disease, and suffering morbid and mental affliction, 
 as is always the case in hypochondriacal maladies. 
 According to his enemies, it arose from feeling him- 
 
 See the First Letter of Junius, dated the 21st of January, 1769.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 7 J 
 
 self neglected, and the government going on with- 
 out his advice or assistance. But this is judging a 
 very great man by a vulgar standard. Lord Chat- 
 ham had arrived at a climacterical period of human 
 life, noted as critical from the earliest records of med- 
 icine, an alteration in the human body, depending on 
 its laws of incrementum and dccrementum, rather than 
 a Pythagorean theory of the mystical number seven. 
 This trying period in the life of man, when the 
 grasshopper is a burden and desire fails, with his 
 gouty diathesis, accounts sufficiently for his deplorable 
 state of health ; not but that it may have been ag- 
 gravated by seeing the magnificent pyramid of his 
 fame dilapidated by ignoble hands. A man is often 
 cheerful under the loss of his arms or his legs, and 
 habit frequently renders a deranged condition of 
 health tolerable ; but a wounded spirit who can 
 bear ? To some very high-minded men, abuse, and 
 even bitter persecution, are more tolerable than ne- 
 glect. So situated, an ancient Roman would have 
 destroyed himself, and a modern one, others ; a 
 condition which a truly great man, and a Christian, 
 would patiently bear under to the destined end ; as 
 did Chatham then, and Napoleon since. 
 
 In the year 1768, our great statesman resigned 
 the only post he had retained, that of privy-seal. It 
 was remarkable, that on this occasion he did not go 
 to court, as is usual, but sent the seals to his Majesty 
 by his intimate and revered friend Lord Camden. 
 The retired minister's disgust was too manifest, and 
 his resentment too strong to be for ever concealed. 
 He felt, as he declared in the House of Lords, that
 
 72 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 
 
 he had been deceived and duped from a very high 
 source under the guise of particular kindness and 
 marked personal respect. He himself constitution- 
 ally and rationally honest, abhorred deceit and hy- 
 pocrisy. In former ages, and in absolutely despotic 
 governments such a powerful man as Pitt, Earl of 
 Chatham, a minister whose transcendent abilities 
 overshadowed Majesty itself, would have been cut 
 off by some violent death, while the monarch was 
 surrounded by innumerable guards. 
 
 In the tragedy of empires, Britain — " that pre- 
 cious stone set in the silver sea"* — exhibited to 
 surrounding nations, and to the eye of philosophy, at 
 the close of the eighteenth century, a rare spec- 
 tacle in her King, his ministers, and his people.f 
 The last scene in this grand drama is to be acted in 
 this new world, 
 
 " Where shall he sung another golden age, 
 The rise of empire, and of arts, 
 The good and great inspiring epic rage, 
 The wisest heads and noblest hearts. 
 
 " Not such as Europe breeds in her decay ; 
 Such as she bred when fresh and young, 
 When heavenly flame did animate her clay 
 By future poets shall be sung. 
 
 * Shakspeare. 
 
 f Lord Malmesbury was sent to Paris in 1796 to offer peace, and it 
 was refused. The following year he returned a second time unsuc- 
 cessful. George the Third was in 1795 and 1796 dangerously as- 
 saulted in his state coach with stones on his way to the parliament 
 house. Soon after there was mutiny throughout the British fleet, and 
 a very alarming rebellion in Ireland. During this state of affairs 
 Bonaparte was carrying his victories over Europe with the rapidity of 
 a torrent, and threatening England with invasion, while the Sovereign 
 suffered a relapse of his insanity, which continued to the close of his 
 long life.
 
 PRELIMINARY VIEW. 73 
 
 " Westward the course of empire takes its way; 
 The four first acts already past, 
 The fifth shall close the drama with the day ; 
 Time's noblest offspring is the last." * 
 
 * Dean Berkeley, afterwards Bishop of Cloyne. This eminent 
 philosopher, good man, and venerable prelate came to America about 
 1723, with the hope of establishing a college for the education of our 
 aboriginal Indians. He resided several years on Rhode Island, and 
 tradition says, he there wrote his " Minute Philosopher.'''' One of my 
 parents, who died at 90 years of age, remembered him distinctly. 
 Another aged person had heard him preach a charity sermon in Boston, 
 and described minutely to me his athletic person. He gave his library, 
 his farm, and mansion, called Whitehall, to the Connecticut College, 
 established at New Haven. 
 
 10
 
 CONCERNING 
 
 JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE FIRST IMPRESSION MADE BY JUNIUS's LETTERS IN OLD 
 
 ENGLAND, AND IN NEW. THE FIRST QUESTION, WHO IS 
 
 JUNIUS? SUSPICION FELL ON THE RIGHT HON. EDMUND 
 
 BURKE. ARGUMENTS AGAINST THAT SUPPOSITION. AN 
 
 EPISODE. 
 
 Behold then the illustrious Chatham, retired, rilled with 
 disgust and resentment, yet silent. Was this an absolute re- 
 tirement from all public cares into the quiet of domestic 
 repose ? By no means. The perturbed spirit cannot rest. 
 
 " O polish'd perturbation ! golden care ! 
 That keep'st the ports of slumber open wide 
 To many a watchful night ! " * 
 
 In less than a year after Lord Chatham withdrew from 
 office, as well as from Parliament, Junius burst forth the 
 champion of the rights of Englishmen, and the stern vindicator 
 of the principles of the constitution. 
 
 These epistles broke upon the public ear like thunder, at a 
 time, and under circumstances, which gave them remarkable 
 force on a discontented nation. I say nation, for these Ameri- 
 
 * Shakspeare.
 
 76 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 can colonies, which then made a part of it, had become, like the 
 Britons, uneasy from the encroachments on their rights, privi- 
 leges, and English feelings, since the second year after the 
 accession of King George the Third. 
 
 Of these letters of Junius, the first appeared on the 21st of 
 January, 1769. In a loud, clear, and very powerful voice, they 
 called forth those dormant feelings, which once constituted the 
 pride and glory of old England ; but which, like the Ens 
 vegetabile in the chilling season of winter, had descended 
 from the branches into the roots of the English oak, possibly 
 never to bud again, had not a happy transplantation of its 
 suckers to this congenial soil, encouraged and secured their 
 growth for ever. These animating addresses were sought after 
 with avidity in New England, and perused and re-perused with 
 eagerness. That their orthodoxy, and the spirit of their senti- 
 ments and style, should be relished here, will surprise no one, 
 who recollects that our forefathers were actuated by the same 
 sentiments and temper when constrained to quit their native land 
 in search of civil and religious freedom. These celebrated 
 compositions were congenial to our clarified puritanism, the 
 celestial spark of which had glimmered, now and then, in the 
 parliament of England even in the reign of the arbitrary Virgin 
 Queen ; while she tried in vain to smother it. 
 
 In 1769 a peculiar heroic opinion prevailed in London. It 
 was not exactly the same with us as with our elder brethren in 
 England. There the animating principle was just roused from 
 its slumber by the loud and commanding voice of Junius 
 Brutus ; who appeared bearing a lighted torch in one hand, 
 to show the people their hazardous situation while sleeping in 
 the dark ; and in the other, a dagger to defend Liberty in her 
 disputed march through an host of enemies, in a land overlaid 
 by frivolity and corruption. If we " in these ends of the 
 earth " were not then quite awake, our slumbers were often 
 disturbed with dreaming of British encroachments, especially 
 after our favorite Pitt had retired from office, and obscured 
 his bright name in that of Chatham.
 
 BURKE SUSPECTED TO BE JUNIUS. 77 
 
 It is said that we of New England are characterized by a 
 remarkably inquisitive spirit. If curiosity be a sign of a vigo- 
 rous intellect, few people have a greater share of it than the 
 native white men of this self-governing region. I can remem- 
 ber, sixty years ago, that the great question agitated, and 
 eagerly discussed, was, — Who is this Junius ? this intrepid 
 and very able man, who attacks thus boldly the highest 
 official characters in the realm, — the high and mighty of our 
 glorious nation, — the chiefs of the law, — the selected counsel- 
 lors of the crown, — the army itself, and the rich and com- 
 pact phalanx of British aristocracy and nobility ; nor stops 
 there, but audaciously attacks the Sovereign himself, the 
 personified majesty of the whole nation, and draws him 
 forth before his whole people from the dark recesses of his 
 palace into open day, to answer for his conduct? To what 
 rank, class, or degree must this lonely man belong, who 
 thus sternly and sarcastically upbraids, in a voice of dig- 
 nified authority, steady and unfaltering, the ministers and 
 favorites of the King, — the head of the judiciary, — the sword- 
 bearers of the law, — and the representatives of the people ; 
 accusing them of violating the principles of the constitution, 
 of lack of wisdom and knowledge, and of misleading a young 
 and inexperienced monarch to the nation's ruin ? 
 
 From between 1769 and 1774, the authorship of Junius was 
 a topic of almost daily conjecture among the sons of the Pil- 
 grims. The puzzle seemed to be, who, among the great men of 
 England (for great he must be) thus daunts, with his casti- 
 gating pen and imposing manner, the whole body of law- 
 makers and law-expounders; nay, the army, the church, and 
 its nominal head, exhibiting him, who is, theoretically, too 
 exalted to do wrong, as another Belshazzar before a second 
 Daniel ? From that time to this period, a space of sixty 
 years, conjecture has been wearied in guessing who that well- 
 informed and polished writer, — that steady, uniform, unflur- 
 ried, powerful, and fearless man could bo, who, rising all at
 
 78 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 once, shook all that could be shaken, that political Jupiter, 
 who but nodded, 
 
 " et totum nutu tremefecit Olympum." 
 
 Suspicion fell upon Edmund Burke, not merely on ac- 
 count of his superior powers in debate, and masterly pen ; 
 but also from his station, and great influence in the Rocking- 
 ham party, that noble band of honorable whigs, so justly 
 celebrated on both sides of the Atlantic. It would be a tax upon 
 patience to recount and dwell on the names of other men, who 
 have each, at different times, been imagined the author of the 
 Letters in question, even down to General Charles Lee,* well 
 known in this country for mediocrity of powers as a soldier and 
 a politician. The search has been too superficial ; and the inqui- 
 ry confined rather to brilliant scholars than profound statesmen. 
 It seems to have been chiefly this, — Who among the British pol- 
 iticians had studied English composition so successfully as to 
 be capable of writing such true and polished examples of it? 
 The error seems to have been, that instead of the soul of 
 Junius, they regarded only his pen ; as if they expected to 
 see an Oliver Goldsmith yoked with a Nicholas Machiavel, 
 ploughing together the same field. Instead of the mind of 
 Raphael, discernible in his compositions and expression, they 
 have stopped short to scrutinize and dispute about his col- 
 oring. 
 
 Mr. Burke stood a fair candidate for the honor ; being a 
 staunch whig, an able speaker, and a fine writer. With a 
 capacious and versatile understanding, he resembled a moun- 
 tain torrent, increased by ceaseless streams, impregnated with 
 every earthly and aerial thing, rich, fragrant, wholesome, and 
 otherwise, running free, clear, rapid, and sonorous ; sometimes 
 turbid, and now and then offensive ; but not marked with the 
 undeviating dignity, resistless force and grandeur of Junius, 
 
 * Lee was to General Washington what Lord George Sackville 
 was to Prince Ferdinand.
 
 ARGUMENTS AGAINST BURKE'S BEING JUNIUS. 79 
 
 who is like a burning wave of volcanic source, its origin in 
 deeply hidden caverns, beyond the strata of gold and glittering 
 gems, in the awful region of earthquakes, " the dark, un- 
 fathomed, infinite abyss." * 
 
 Had the facts contained in the Letters of Junius been all 
 spread before Mr. Burke, he might, by his taste and patient 
 attention, have expressed them to the understanding with equal 
 elegance if not force ; but the original feeling, the symptoms of 
 a febrile excitement, the rage, the provocation, the induce- 
 ment, the fire in the embers, perceptible in Junius, and all that 
 which art and genius could not have supplied, would have been 
 wanting. Could a man, writing for fame, for money, or high 
 station, speak like that terrific being behind the curtain ? Be- 
 sides, what extraordinary provocation had Edmund Burke to 
 speak daggers in 1769, '70, '71, and '72 ? He lived and 
 moved under the patronage of the Marquis of Rockingham, 
 and of that small, but condensed phalanx of intrepid whigs, in 
 which, for a series of years, he carried a pair of colors, and 
 sometimes appeared to exercise a higher command. Add to 
 this, Burke could hardly have been acquainted with the arcana 
 secretissima of the court of England, and of some other courts, 
 with which it is evident Junius was familiar, and with that of 
 England even to a personal knowledge of regal affairs, and 
 even all the domestic circumstances of royalty; which appears 
 from his treating the most imposing part of the garb of 
 government with the steady composure of a veteran, grown 
 grey and weary in its gaudy service. Mr. Burke held up 
 exquisite and highly wrought small pictures of East Indian 
 anecdotes, calculated to excite horror and indignation. He 
 frightens you with his lively paintings, executed with Dutch 
 exactness, of the rage, rags, dirt, blood, and splendor of dis- 
 tracted France ; and, for a moment, we feel the theatrical 
 effect. The sphere of his vision, however, never extended 
 to American greatness. He never^saw this vast country 
 
 * Milton.
 
 80 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 with the optics of Lord Chatham. Hence he sighed not over 
 the departing greatness of Britain, when she pressed us to 
 draw the defensive sword, as did that prophetic statesman. 
 This passionate, warm-hearted, and brilliant son of Ireland, 
 only raved, stamped, swore, and cried at the momentary 
 delirium of disordered France. He saw not its final salutiferous 
 effects. 
 
 To compare sculptors and painters with orators and political 
 writers, may we not say that Burke was an admirable painter 
 of the Venetian school ; that he was to Lord Chatham and to 
 Junius, what Tintoret was to Michael Angelo and Titian ? 
 Chatham and Angelo were original masters ; Burke and Tin- 
 toret, admirably apt and most excellent scholars. " I follow," 
 said this charming, rapid, and various painter, (Tintoret paint- 
 ed without previous sketch or study,) " I follow Michael Angelo 
 for my designs, and Titian for my coloring." Whom did 
 Angelo follow ? Whom did Chatham imitate ? They followed 
 only the grand, beautiful, and forcible of nature. There is 
 internal evidence of self-derivation in Junius, as clearly so 
 as of originality in Chatham. 
 
 1 mistake the character of Edmund Burke, luxuriant as was 
 his genius and exuberant his fancy, if he could sustain the 
 dignified deportment of indignant Junius for three years togeth- 
 er without once betraying the Irish brogue, or the smell of 
 whiskey. Burke seemed to be excited by the hectic fever of 
 genius, and, at times, by its delirium. Furthermore, I 
 consider the correspondence, carried on with an individual 
 printer, during at least three years, under a mask, which the 
 most prying curiosity was unable to penetrate, as one of the 
 most extraordinary facts in history ; and to my view bordering 
 on the wonderful. All which I regard as beyond the powers 
 and the means of Mr. Burke. 
 
 It may be said, — Why dwell on the question of Mr. Burke, 
 seeing he positively and repeatedly denied that he was the 
 author of the Letters in question, as many had guessed ? We 
 answer, that the situation and circumstances of the author,
 
 AN EPISODE. 81 
 
 whoever he may be, are such as to set all asseverations at 
 nought ; on which we shall speak more distinctly hereafter. 
 
 This question may be well asked by a British reader, — Who 
 and what are you, who thus undertake to determine the most 
 important secret of our times? you, born and dwelling in a far- 
 distant region from us, where, a little over two hundred years 
 ago, an English word had never been uttered ; a country abso- 
 lutely unknown four hundred years since ; a region, nay, a 
 quarter of the globe, of which the ancients had no knowledge, 
 not even a tradition of its existence. Is it likely that an 
 inhabitant of such a new-found land can untie a knot after 
 all our efforts have failed ? The punishment to be inflicted 
 for such an untoward question, shall be 
 
 AN EPISODE. 
 
 The land in which we dwell, these United States of North 
 America, is, perhaps, the spot on the globe best adapted for a 
 political camera obscura* whence to view the stationary and 
 the moving scenery of Europe. The distance favors it, and 
 our position, New England, is well calculated for contemplating 
 the interesting planet Great Britain, the Saturn in the Europe- 
 an system, with its wondrous ring, its floating fortifications, and 
 golden commerce. The wide space between is not unfavorable 
 to this notion, seeing distance in space operates like distance 
 of time. 
 
 The earliest settlement of New England was made by 
 transplanted Englishmen ; a courageous band, animated by 
 religious zeal, of more than ordinary enterprise and education, 
 several of their leaders being sons of Oxford and of Cambridge. 
 
 * A camera obscura is a sort of artificial eye, or optical machine, so 
 constructed that the images of external objects arc distinctly and 
 correctly represented in their true perspective light and shade, their 
 proper colors, and with all their motions. 
 
 11
 
 82 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 An unmixed population, unaltered language, and general ac- 
 quaintance with English history, set off with a steady perusal 
 of the holy Scriptures, have ever since enabled us to consider 
 deliberately our own situation and powers, as well as the 
 characteristical temper and most striking features of the British 
 people, their noble struggles for rational freedom, their re- 
 bellions, their revolutions, their numerous wars, their eminent 
 men, their boasted constitution of government, their general 
 literature, and their individual examples of brilliant genius. 
 While we view these things with admiration, smaller matters 
 and little defects are lost, like the voice of their local com- 
 batants in the silent space between us. In such remoteness, 
 temporary contentions, adventitious circumstantials, hard words, 
 jealousies, and fears among rivals are spent in the intervening 
 air, and happily lost to our senses. A situation this, best 
 adapted to impartial history ; and it is the position which a 
 writer should wish to occupy when surveying the condition 
 and movements of a kindred nation ; as proximity is unfavora- 
 ble to dignified history. 
 
 Our situation and circumstances as a free and inquisitive 
 people, violently split off from a great naval and commercial 
 nation at three thousand miles' distance, yet reading the same 
 books, writing the same language, exercised in the same system 
 of a protestant education, listening to the same dramas, following 
 in dress and manners the same fashions, pathetically affected by 
 similar idiosyncrasies and superstitions, evinced by our diseases 
 and by our delight in Shakspeare, would, it seems, constitute 
 us a people thoroughly British in our notions, prejudices, 
 sympathies, antipathies, admirations, and theological theories. 
 The famous Prince and Bishop Talleyrand, on his return to 
 France from America, reported to the French Academy or 
 National Institute, that we were, to all intents, English. But 
 this very able man and profound politician did not remain 
 here long enough to characterize us exactly. In our churches, 
 in the resorts of merchants, in our theatrical exhibitions, on 
 board our ships, in the structure and furniture of our houses,
 
 AN EPISODE. 83 
 
 and in our very numerous gay shops, we seem, to the eye of 
 a transient visiter, a people merely English ; and perhaps so 
 to the understanding of the sojourner, who may remark, that 
 whenever we utter the conceptions of our minds, they are 
 clothed in the same language, literal and figurative ; yet are 
 we, after all, a somewhat different people from the English, 
 Scotch, Irish, Dutch, or French. The current of our thoughts, 
 and the direction of our views, are variant from them all. We 
 have no hereditary chief magistrate, nor royal family, nor 
 that imperium in imperio, a court, with its perplexing, and, in 
 some respects, ridiculous appendages. We bend the knee to 
 no earthly fountain of honor ; and those glistening rills of it, 
 so precious in the eyes of the British, reach us not, but are 
 lost in the intervening ocean ; their sources or head-springs, 
 which are objects of a species of worship in Europe, are 
 little regarded here. Heraldry, so sedulously studied in the 
 land of our forefathers, is here an unknown science, and its 
 terms hardly intelligible. * Hence it is we cannot call a poor old 
 man, His Holiness, or any man whatever, His Sacred Majesty. 
 We educate our children to venerate old age, and to look 
 through the halo of etiquette to the man himself; and we 
 point them to the New Testament, and teach them to compare 
 the high-sounding titles of the transatlantic priesthood with the 
 lives and doctrines of the disciples of the immaculate Founder 
 of our Holy Religion. 
 
 Nevertheless our government is not absolutely democratical, 
 seeing wc have, in a qualified sense, a King, Lords, and 
 House of Commons, in our federal as well as state governments, 
 only they are elective for one or more years, while the people, 
 when they choose to speak or act, are Sovereign ; out- 
 laws are made, established, and enforced by the concurrence 
 of all the three branches, as in England ; and our judiciary is 
 a close imitation of the English. The theory of all this may 
 be expressed in one word, general consent. Alike as we are in 
 the forms, the perspicax oculus may discern a difference 
 between the people of Old England and of New. In the first,
 
 84 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 there is more of prejudice and acquiescence in authority, an 
 obsequiousness rather than a consent. It is this sort of adopted 
 government, and an education of youth in which corporal 
 correction is almost entirely excluded and considered igno- 
 minious, and our singular situation on the terraqueous globe, 
 which have turned the stream of our thoughts into channels 
 and eddies variant from those of the British, or of any other 
 nation upon earth, and directed our views to objects, in some 
 measure, peculiar to ourselves. But the Briton who is only 
 acquainted with our merchants, seamen, and journal-compilers, 
 would form a different judgment. 
 
 Never having bowed the knee to the conqueror's sword or 
 the monarch's sceptre, we, like the brave sons of nature in our 
 forests, regard and honor the superior powers of the mind if 
 joined with heroic deeds ; but pay little attention to the adven- 
 titious garb with which accident or blind fortune may have 
 clothed men. Hence an American calls the chief magistrate 
 or elective monarch of his nation by the simple name given 
 him at his birth. 
 
 Such a people enjoying almost Indian freedom may have a 
 lively relish for the best portions of Grecian and Roman history, 
 while the early British annals shall not make the same impres- 
 sion on their minds as is generally made upon the prejudiced, I 
 had almost said bigoted minds of the inhabitants of that renowned 
 island whence we in New England principally sprang. When 
 we cast our eyes over the hazy and indistinct landscape which 
 Old England exhibits from the days of King Alfred down to the 
 time of those " iron barons," who, in rusty armour, eternized 
 the name of their effigy of a king by compelling him to sign 
 their Magna Charta, we find less to detain the mind than if 
 we were natives of England and subjects of her king. What 
 are the castle-building, bow-and-arrow epochs of the island of 
 Britain to us, when Kings sought security behind thick walls 
 of stone and mounds of earth, and behind ditches and draw- 
 bridges, while their soldiery were cased up in iron and brass ; 
 when the morals of the men, and of the women also, were
 
 AN EPISODE. 85 
 
 thought insecure outside the walls of monasteries and nun- 
 neries ? Millions of people in these new states never saw a 
 castle, a monastery, or a crowned king.* We run rapidly 
 over, with little interest, that portion of English history 
 when fighting and devotion divided the world. What deep 
 interest can we feel in the Duke of Normandy, so famed in 
 British heraldry as the fountain of their honor ? — a French 
 adventurer, a sort of land-pirate, who destroyed six and thirty 
 churches to make more room for hunting, and who punished 
 with the loss of eyes whoever of his subjects killed a stag 
 or a wild boar. Yet is this ruffian king, called by way 
 of eminence " the Conqueror," acknowledged the rightful 
 and glorious Sovereign of a people who have, with glaring 
 inconsistency, called Napoleon an usurper, — him who received 
 his imperial crown from a large majority of Frenchmen in the 
 free election of an affectionate and admiring people, and that not 
 by right of conquest, but was declared " the Lord's anointed" 
 according to the solemn rites of both the Gallican and Anglican 
 churches. We Americans see all these things through optics 
 of our own ; and do not always use the sterling steelyard of 
 our ancestors when we weigh these great personages. 
 
 No vestiges of the delirious crusaders are to be seen in 
 this New World, nor any thing to call to mind those unsettled 
 times when all Christendom united, for the first time, to destroy 
 the believers in Mahomet, the most numerous sect upon 
 earth, and to recover from them " the holy land," the scene of 
 the life and sufferings of our Saviour : a mere pretext, the 
 reality being to prevent the destruction of every government 
 in Europe that would not bow in adoration of the crescent 
 instead of the cross, — when English kings quitted their thrones 
 to visit popes and miserable shrines, and roam in foreign lands 
 
 * On the banks of the Delaware now resides Joseph Bonaparte, the 
 quondam king of Spain, greatly esteemed and respected by his 
 neighbours ; a man of whom Napoleon said that " he was too good to be a 
 King."
 
 86 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 in search of the kingdom of heaven, while the most erudite 
 spent their lives in searching for the living among the dead. 
 Except to the mere antiquarian, and the learned law-coun- 
 sellor, there is very little of the English history that is 
 interesting to us before we come to the period of Henry the 
 Eighth, and that chiefly because it is connected with his 
 more meritorious contemporaries on the thrones of France, 
 Germany, and Turkey.* 
 
 Elizabeth indeed calls forth curiosity, as her history has 
 in it mat which rivets attention, because the latter part of her 
 brilliant reign is a portion of our own earliest history * It was 
 owing to that great woman's love of finery, f gorgeous parades, 
 sacerdotal pomp, and solemn nonsense, that the wilderness of 
 North America was peopled by an heroic race of Puritans, 
 who ultimately divided one half of the British empire from the 
 other.J Such an emigration or expatriation is not to be found 
 on the records of mankind. The exodus of the Jews from 
 Egypt to the land of plenty, of the Trojans from Greece to 
 Latium, of the Goths to Italy, of the Spaniards to South America 
 in search of gold and silver, shrink to nothing in point of heroic 
 enterprise, when compared with the embarkation of men of the 
 middle rank of life, with their wives and children, to go they 
 knew not whither, to meet they knew not what or whom, their 
 object to worship God according to the dictates of their con- 
 science. Matchless Heroism ! " They left their native land," 
 says Junius, " in search of freedom, and found it in a des- 
 ert." § A country settled by such a people, encouraged to 
 it by such motives, will breed a race who will think for them- 
 selves, govern themselves, and worship the only One, Infinite, 
 Self-existing Being in their own way. 
 
 * Francis the First, Emperor Charles the Fifth, and Solyman the 
 Magnificent. 
 
 f David Hume expresses the like idea. 
 \ See the first Letter of Junius, 
 § Letter to the King.
 
 AN EPISODE. 37 
 
 Elizabeth was assuredly a powerful and extraordinary 
 woman ; but the splendor and felicities of her reign have not 
 so dazzled our eyes as to prevent us from seeing the weak 
 parts of her character, and the slavish cast of her servile Par- 
 liament,* in which, however, happily lurked a small spark of 
 Puritanism, enough to enlighten this country at the beginning, 
 and from a small matter to make us what we are. 
 
 Very many people of Great Britain, and not a few of the Brit- 
 ish historians, in giving the character of " the Virgin Queen," 
 dwell too much upon her treatment of the beautiful and impru- 
 dent Mary Queen of Scots, whom she was constrained to keep 
 in considerate confinement many years. They rest the natu- 
 ral character of Elizabeth almost entirely upon her putative 
 envy of the personal charms so largely shared by Mary and 
 so scantily given to Elizabeth. Something may possibly be 
 attributed to a sexual characteristic, but nothing like what has 
 been made of it. It is a superficial view of a regal character, 
 and beneath the dignity of a national history. What is the 
 beauty of queens to any one but the poet, the painter, and that 
 corruptor of chaste history, the novelist, though tricked out 
 by the fanciful pen of a Burke ? I have seen his wonderful 
 Austrian Princess, at the height of her personal splendor and 
 happiness, as Queen of France, without absolute fascination, — 
 without being dazzled by the sight into undiscerning amaze- 
 ment ; and am persuaded that I could have gazed with 
 admiration on the more beautiful and accomplished Mary 
 without forgetting entirely her lineage, her family connexions, 
 and her Jesuitical education. I believe there is in animated 
 nature a good breed and a bad breed, even in the human species, 
 as well as in animals beneath us. Mary Queen of Scots was 
 a Guise, niece to the famous Duke of that name, and to the 
 Cardinal Lorraine. She was educated under them, and under 
 Catharine cle Medicis, three as pernicious characters as any in 
 history. From these detestable sources she imbibed her li- 
 
 * Hume says, that the Parliament in 1601 made little distinction 
 between Queen Elizabeth and the Deity.
 
 88 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 centious manners and loose principles, and. anti-Anglican 
 notions of religion and government ; and she transmitted to her 
 posterity a deep tinge of all their corruptions. Her conduct 
 during her confinement in the north of England, particularly 
 her correspondence with certain persons on the continent, was 
 such as to induce the Parliament to request the Queen, more 
 than once, to order her execution. They doubtless saw that 
 the question then was, — Who shall wear the crown of England, 
 Mary or Elizabeth ? After a great struggle, Elizabeth at 
 length was brought, as the Sovereign, to consent to the death of 
 her unhappy relation. In this she acted like a great, just, and 
 wise chief magistrate. When she was informed that Mary 
 was beheaded, she wept, raved, and in her frantic fits accused 
 herself and every one about her. In this she acted like a 
 woman ; and when she abused and punished the agent she 
 employed in transmitting the fatal warrant, pretending she had 
 been deceived and betrayed into the bloody measure, she acted 
 like a fool. In such a distressful case what can we say, but — 
 Alas ! poor human nature ! Such was the glorious Queen 
 Elizabeth, with better and more humane feelings than those 
 which marked and disgraced Mary and Catharine. 
 
 " If to her share some human frailties fall, . 
 
 View the whole Queen, and you '11 forget them all." 
 
 In this vast region of free thought and frank expression of 
 it, we can utter our feelings of commiseration for the ill- 
 educated and deluded King Charles the First ; and vociferate 
 our disapprobation of the worst of all the Stuart race, his son. 
 Nay, further. We dare weigh Oliver Cromwell himself in the 
 scales of even-handed justice, and freely and fearlessly compare 
 him with other British kings or conquerors, and declare aloud 
 our opinions of them as men, soldiers, politicians, and Christians. 
 Mr. Hume, in his systematic history of England, after giving 
 a pretty candid account of the actions of Cromwell, sums up 
 his character, and gives a portrait of him, which his own 
 narrative contradicts. Sir Walter Scott has done just so in
 
 AN EPISODE. 89 
 
 his history and character of Napoleon. But we have no 
 king, queen, heir apparent or presumptive, to gratify and flatter 
 by " telling their fortunes." Instead of that cruel abuse and 
 unfair treatment, we only hold up to our magistrates the 
 scripture doctrine of retributive justice, the simple principle of 
 Whatsoever a man soivcth that shall he also reap. 
 
 Being an independent people, and separated from the old 
 world by a thousand leagues of ocean, we endeavour to think 
 down our early prejudices, and correct in ourselves the errors 
 of the people we originally sprang from, by comparing them 
 with other nations. 
 
 We colonists were taught from our infancy to believe, that 
 the people of England were the most magnanimous, brave, and 
 humane race of men upon earth, and in every thing superior 
 to the French except fiddling, dancing, and fencing. The 
 only specimens of Frenchmen we had opportunity of seeing 
 were mercantile men, born in the West India islands, and 
 their appearance tended to confirm our ridiculous ideas of 
 the difference in men who fed on la soupe maigre, and the 
 substantial roast-beef of Old England ; so that when w T e in these 
 colonies were children in British leading-strings, we spake as 
 children on national character, we understood as children, we 
 thought as children; but when we became men in 177G, we 
 put away most of our childish notions. Thus, when a French 
 army with General Rochambeau at their head came to this 
 country, and put themselves under the command of Washing- 
 ton, we could see, compare, and judge for ourselves. We 
 admired their athletic men, bordering on the gigantic, and 
 noticed with surprise that one Frenchman generally ate as 
 much as two Englishmen, and drank much less ; and found 
 them a more civil and better behaved people. But above all 
 we were delighted with their parental or patriarchal govern- 
 ment of their soldiery, exhibiting a striking contrast between 
 the management of their men, and the severe, nay cruel 
 discipline of the British and German troops. In one army no 
 drunkenness was to be seen ; in the other, sobriety could hardly 
 
 12
 
 90 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 be maintained without the degrading lash. There was so 
 little of corporal punishment in the French camp compared 
 with the British and Germans, that the inhabitants of Rhode 
 Island, at last, suspected that their " good and great allies " 
 punished their soldiers privately ; but the real fact was, the 
 French captain treated his men as his children, and addressed 
 them as such, while the British and the Germans treated their 
 rank and file more like slaves.* 
 
 It is a very serious fact worthy the attention of that transat- 
 lantic power whom it most concerns, that the shocking and 
 incessant whippings in the British garrisons in America, and 
 particularly in that of Boston, long before the battle of Bunker 
 Hill, tended more to reconcile even the tories, royalists, or 
 " the King's friends," to a separation from the mother country 
 than any other circumstance before that memorable battle. 
 The native inhabitants of both parties considered it treating 
 white-men as badly as they conceived slave-holders treated 
 negroes. They revolted at the idea of their children being 
 thus dealt with hereafter by commissioned officers, author- 
 ized by the King to keep them in subjection. Some have 
 said that England lost the affection of the colonists by neglect- 
 ing entirely the study of the human heart ; and there is more 
 truth in the remark than ever the executive and legislative 
 branches of the British government conceived. 
 
 Whatever faults may yet remain in us uncorrected, cruelty and 
 inhumanity belong not to the American character. The opposite 
 character is conspicuous throughout the war of independ- 
 ence, and the glorious war for sailors' rights against impress- 
 
 * Among the Germans corporal punishment was extended beyond 
 the rank and file. It was the duty of two young surgeons to remain all 
 night in the military hospital at Newport, Rhode Island, where were 
 some very sick. The superior officer of the German medical staff went 
 to the hospital in the evening, and discovered that the two mates were 
 gone to a dance. For this desertion from their duty he caused them to 
 be tied neck and heels ; and they suffered under the beastly punishment 
 during one hour. Had this been done in the American or British army, 
 it would have cost the Physician General his brains.
 
 AN EPISODE. 91 
 
 ment by a foreign power.* Whigs and tories equally abhorred 
 the cruel whippings of soldiers for intoxication and sleepiness, 
 or even for desertion. The inhabitants of Boston hated 
 the very name and sight of a British soldier, and actually drove 
 two regiments out of their city to take shelter at Castle William 
 on an island five miles from the town, before any absolute or reg- 
 ular hostility commenced. Yet their feelings revolted at seeing 
 young men, some who had hardly attained the full growth of 
 men, stripped to their skins, in winter, and tied to a post, and, 
 in that immovable posture, several men made to inflict upon 
 each of them 500 lashes with knotted cords, nine in number, 
 making 4,500 stripes on the tender and very sensitive skin of a 
 human being. The agony of the sufferers is beyond the power 
 of expression by words, and under it they frequently die. 
 This is no exaggeration. 1 assert it from medical authority, 
 and repeat it from the highest authority, namely, Junius, who 
 subjoins in a note to that portion of his celebrated Letter to his 
 Sovereign, where he mentions the army, the words following : 
 — " So much for the officers. The private men have four 
 pence a day to subsist on, and five hundred lashes if they 
 desert. Under this punishment they frequently expire." 
 
 Such a practice is a disgrace to any government upon earth, 
 and an abomination to that one which is ever boasting of its 
 characteristic humanity. Take a dog or a horse and carefully 
 divest him of his hair, that is, his clothing, bind him fast to a 
 post and then set half a dozen men, for less would be tired 
 out, to inflict upon him from 500 to 1000 lashes, and I ques- 
 tion whether the inhabitants of any city, unless it had a very 
 numerous and overwhelming British or German garrison, would 
 remain quiet while such cruelty was carrying into execution. 
 Yet is this degree of barbarity perpetrated on a human being 
 endowed with the keenest bodily and the highest mental sen- 
 sibility of any animal in the scale of sublunary beings, and that by 
 
 * I say foreign power ; being convinced that it is right, fair, and just 
 to compel our own seamen to enter our own ships of war, when any 
 sudden emergency shall threaten the vital interests of commerce or 
 the country's safety.
 
 92 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 a nation addicted to prate everlastingly of their humane dis- 
 position as one of their most amiable traits of character. An 
 Englishman is not so apt to stab to the heart in a sudden gust 
 of passion, in a violent fit of rage, or the madness of jealousy, 
 as the Spaniard, the Portuguese, or the Italian, and perhaps the 
 Irishman ; yet has he a cool, deliberate, and slowly calculating 
 system of human torture, graduated by a court-martial, totally 
 unknown in the penal codes of the United States whether civil 
 or military. To prove or to disprove this allegation, consult 
 the British history, examine the English penal code, and turn 
 to the records of their punishments from Henry the Eighth to 
 our own times,* and see whether we have calumniated a people 
 who were bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh. Nor stop 
 there, but scrutinize our motives, and judge whether what we 
 have said be from a disposition to find fault, or to reform. 
 This detestation of degrading and cruel punishments is not a 
 transient whim. It pervades New England, where the inhabit 
 tants are all of one color ; it reigns in our schools, and adorns 
 our courts of law. The indecent, the shameful modes of 
 punishment inflicted on young gentlemen in the Westminster 
 and Eton schools are thought of in this country with disgust 
 and abhorrence. In this cardinal point of degrading and cruel 
 punishments we Americans differ widely from the people we 
 sprang from ; and it has laid and still lays a strong line of 
 demarcation between the English character and the American. 
 The treatment of prisoners of war justifies our assertion. 
 
 Have we said enough, or too much, to show that instead of 
 fortifying our early notions and juvenile prejudices, we Ameri- 
 cans try to reason down bigotry, that we may be able to judge of 
 the sovereigns of the British, of their hereditary aristocracy, of 
 their government, and of their people, as deliberately as we do of 
 
 * Within the current year appeared in our newspapers an article 
 taken from an English paper, stating that two sergeants belonging to 
 a certain British regiment quartered in Ireland, were sentenced to 
 receive each a thousand lashes, that one received upwards of COO, the 
 other upwards of 500, when they were unbound lest they should expire 
 under the torture.
 
 AN EPISODE. 93 
 
 the characters and the affairs of the Greeks and Romans ? Have 
 we rendered it probable that we are, in a good measure, divested 
 of many idle notions, undue partialities and practices, prevalent 
 in the land of our ancestors ? Not that we advocate the eradica- 
 tion of all prejudices ; some of which are necessary to our 
 happiness if not existence, outrunning the slow pace of reason, 
 and partaking more of instinct ; as the love of parents, and of 
 our native country, which it would be wicked to smother, since 
 they are implanted in our very nature to supply the place of 
 reason, and are strongest where that is weakest. 
 
 We whose native language is English, possess a vast region 
 of the globe, varied in climate and still more in fertility, 
 diversified by mountains and valleys, the whole interposed 
 between the boundless Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and all 
 connected together by navigable rivers of unparalleled extent 
 and magnitude, with interior seas greatly surpassing those in any 
 other quarter of the globe, and rapidly traversed by the force 
 of steam, a powerful but invisible agent, destined to expedite 
 civilization, far more rapid (yet managable) than the wind itself. 
 Neither Greeks, Romans, nor Phoenicians had any knowledge 
 or even tradition of this vast country. The two first called all 
 the more northern people Scythians, and all the western 
 Celta, indiscriminately. Of Africa, they had no other knowl- 
 edge than the nearest part of Ethiopia, nor even of Asia 
 beyond the Ganges.* The boasted travels of certain philoso- 
 phers and conquerors, so extraordinary during the epoch of 
 Grecian splendor, excite a smile when compared with the 
 voyages in our own days. 
 
 Having then, a wider horizon and fewer fables than the Greeks 
 or Romans, and standing upon the shoulders of the British phi- 
 losophers and politicians, we ought to see farther than they. 
 Since the mariner's compass has aided commerce to bind a 
 discordant world together in a golden chain, and since gun- 
 powder has equalized the contests of battle, and the art of 
 
 * See Bacon's Novum Organum, Part. I. Sect. iv.
 
 94 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 printing given wings to literature, a new order of things, 
 undreamt of by the ancients, has taken place. With these 
 advantages, and several others untold, we ventured half a 
 century ago upon the experiment of self-government, and 
 succeeded to our utmost wish ; our success being accompanied 
 with a new and remarkable fact in the history of nations, which 
 stamps us a peculiar people. I mean, that during a ten years' 
 dispute in words, and a seven years' contest in arms, we had 
 no vgry great and leading man amongst us, to whose particular 
 and individual foresight, wisdom, and personal address, we can 
 or ought to give the lofty title of Liberator or Saviour of 
 his country. The memoirs of Franklin, and the printed letters 
 of Washington, evince this. There was too much diffused wis- 
 dom in the great body of the people, and too much integrity in 
 their representatives to admit an overshadowing of any individual 
 leader. It was the wisdom of the people that made Washington 
 what he was, from the very best of materials ; and he reflected 
 back upon them his glorious character. Less conspicuous 
 but by no means less efficacious were the unwearied labors of 
 Samuel Adams in New England, and Benjamin Franklin 
 in Europe. But neither of them could ever have pushed 
 forward a family interest an inch, had he tried. George 
 Washington was drawn out from his liberal retirement by the 
 voice of a judicious community. The people felt an irresisti- 
 ble confidence, that, under God, they were to be free by their 
 own energy, wisdom, and courage, through the guiding influ- 
 ence of honest statesmen, and a cool, very prudent, republican 
 General. And the one destined to lead was replete with that 
 determined patriotic spirit, which reigned and triumphed 
 throughout our seven years' struggle for independence, and 
 eight years afterwards. Yet ten years anterior to his public 
 appearance, the unconquerable spirit of Independence, " lord 
 of the lion heart and eagle eye," inspired the souls of some in 
 New England, particularly one, who with a prophet's foresight, 
 and the persevering zeal of a reformer, united the fearless 
 heart of a martyr. He did more than sow the seeds of
 
 AN EPISODE. 95 
 
 independence in a Puritan soil ; he first touched and then 
 managed those secret springs which separated us from the 
 mother country, and insensibly brought forward that great and 
 modest man, to whom a grateful people spontaneously gave the 
 most honorable and endearing of titles, — The Father of 
 His Country.* 
 
 Although derived principally from an English stock, we are 
 yet theoretically and habitually a different people. It is from 
 that memorable era of freedom denominated in England the 
 glorious Revolution of 1G8S, that we Americans trace a 
 common principle of liberty with the English. It was when they 
 called in a Dutchman to fill the throne of Great Britain ; a man 
 like our Washington, " silent and thoughtful ; given to hear and 
 inquire ; of a sound and steady understanding ; firm in what 
 he once resolved or once denied ; strongly intent on business, 
 little on pleasure ; by these virtues he engaged the attention of 
 all men." f Anterior to this epoch of whig principles, we are 
 seldom disposed to cite English authorities ; for what is there 
 for veneration or example in the Plantagenets, Tudors, or 
 Stuarts, or in their imported queens ? We hold in high esti- 
 mation the faithful history of that wise, brave, and prudent 
 people the Dutch, a race of men renowned for industry, 
 sobriety, and learning, who have made their country, in spite 
 of unpropitious nature, the most convenient and wonderful 
 territory upon earth, bearing marks throughout of a sagacious, 
 wise, and moral people, and whose metropolis not very long ago 
 was the emporium of the world. J They are a people who not 
 only excel in what may be called the economy of human life, 
 but in learning also. May it not be said of that small territory 
 denominated the Seven Provinces of Holland, that it contains 
 
 * Washington never ceased to betray marks of uneasiness when- 
 ever complimented as The great man of the revolution. He used to 
 say — " J claim only the honor of commanding a brave and patriotic 
 army in obedience to Congress." 
 
 f Hume's character of King William the Third. 
 
 | Amsterdam.
 
 96 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 more learning than any district of its size, that is or ever was in 
 the world ? 
 
 I am not certain that we could follow the literature and phi- 
 losophy of a wiser nation than the British or the Dutch. But 
 why follow any, seeing our vantage-ground excels that of 
 either ? We occupy a spot clear of false doctrines, and an- 
 tiquated opinions on most subjects. We should ever bear in 
 mind, that whoever follows must of necessity go behind. 
 
 Next after surmounting national prejudices, and local super- 
 stitions, is the heroic effort to rise above the prejudice of time, 
 lest we too become nailed to the opinion that the ancients 
 monopolized knowledge. Great, very great, as some of them 
 certainly were, take them in the aggregate, we shall find them 
 behind us, whatever some men of deep classical learning may 
 imagine. Nor is that a matter for surprise, seeing venerable 
 antiquity is in fact the youth of the world, and our times the 
 age of maturity and riper judgment, and greater experience, 
 and infinitely greater variety of knowledge. Shall we then, 
 who live in the more advanced age of the world, indulge the 
 idle disposition of confining our views to the narrow specula- 
 tions of the ancients. The history of little more than a 
 thousand years comprises all they knew. Great as some of 
 the ancients confessedly were, it is a diminution of the majesty 
 of mind to be awe-struck by the genius and industry of the 
 most eminent of them. 
 
 Have we in this reverie done injustice to any ? for " I am 
 really," to use the words of Pope, " so far gone as to take 
 pleasure in reveries of this kind." I will put an end to them 
 with saying, that the separation of interests and of government 
 which took place about fifty years ago between America and 
 Great Britain, has not diminished in our eyes the brightness of 
 that glorious constellation of genius and learning which marks 
 and dignifies the reign of the Virgin Queen. We gaze at it 
 from our observatory with undiminished admiration. Happy 
 Elizabeth ! to have flourished in the era of Bacon and 
 Shakspeare ! Fortunate Alexander ! to have run his race of 
 glory in the days of Aristotle and Plato !
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 IMPOSSIBLE THAT JUNIUS COULD HAVE BEEN THE SOLE 
 
 DEPOSITARY OF HIS OWN SECRET. MUST HAVE BEEN PAST 
 
 THE NOON OF LIFE. A NOBLEMAN, RICH, AND POWERFUL. 
 
 HIS WRITINGS MARKED BY PECULIARITY OF STYLE. 
 
 THEIR TENDENCY ALWAYS PATRIOTIC, AND EXCLUSIVELY 
 
 ENGLISH. HIS LETTER TO LORD CAMDEN DIFFERENT 
 
 FROM ALL THE REST. 
 
 Sitting down to our adjusted camera, let us regard the 
 passing scenery across the Atlantic ; and skipping over our 
 digression, unite here the broken thread of our discourse. 
 
 It appears to our view, that the writings of Junius emanated 
 from one mind, and yet not without assistance. Some person 
 must have been privy to them ; but this aid must have been 
 confined to the writer's own household, to his nearest family 
 connexions ; subordinate to one great, overruling mind ; an 
 affair strictly, virtuously, and sacredly confidential, between per- 
 sons knit closely together by affection, and bound to each other 
 by a congenial feeling of resentment and of danger, partners 
 "whose double bosoms seem to wear one heart" ; like hus- 
 band, wife, and daughter by themselves in a deserted bark at 
 sea, to sink or swim together. Otherwise, the transcription and 
 the immediate transmission of those letters to one and the same 
 printer could not have been accomplished, circumstances con- 
 sidered ; a service that could not be purchased with money or 
 enforced by authority. It must have been done through kin- 
 dred aid alone, it being that kind of concern in which the 
 stranger doth not intermeddle. Without such domestic aid 
 
 13
 
 98 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 and affectionate conspiration, we cannot conceive that such an 
 extraordinary and dangerous correspondence could possibly 
 have been carried on three years undetected, and have re- 
 mained undivulged to- this time. None of the searchers after 
 Junius have considered this point with due attention. 
 
 The whole series of Letters indicate the author of them to 
 have been a great man, a rich man, and an indignant one ; 
 for here resentment and even wrath supplied the ordinary stim- 
 ulus of fame, which the great man was contented to forego, 
 sharpening to a keen edge the weapon of personal indignation 
 as well as public avengement. Anger may be terrible, yet 
 allowable, provided we sin not. But the indignation of Junius 
 has been too often called rancor, venom, and malice. If a 
 considerable portion of his Letters, even the bitterest part of 
 them, had been displayed in poetry instead of prose, they 
 would have been denominated satire, and not stigmatized as 
 effusions of a malignant heart. Did ever Junius show so vin- 
 dictive a spirit towards the Duke of Grafton or Lord Mans- 
 field, as Burke testified towards Warren Hastings ? In invec- 
 tive did he exceed very much Lord Chatham in parliament ? 
 
 The diction and style of Junius are peculiarly his own. 
 Pregnant with meaning, his language differs from that of all other 
 writers. Amid the most taunting sarcasms he is solemn, haughty, 
 and impatient ; and whenever he is disposed to be playful, it is 
 the lion dandling the ape. He never attempts to hold up the 
 office of a king to ridicule, nor betrays the least sign of a wish 
 to be one. Neither is there a discernible effort to stir up from 
 the dust of the ground dangerous popular impressions, out- 
 rageous passions, or wild superstitions, such as are engendered 
 between wrath and ignorance, calculated to move the legs and 
 arms of the people, rather than to operate on their understand- 
 ing and judgment. Stripped of all equivocation, he addresses 
 minds of the first order. He lays no traps for weak intellects, 
 no snares for the unwary, has no tricks of short-lived policy ; all 
 is open and above-board. He speaks to his contemporaries, and 
 at the same time to posterity. Though his awful warnings are
 
 CHARACTER OF HIS STYLE. 99 
 
 in the dignified style of a prophet, he hints at no deep, dark, 
 and portentous designs yet unrevealed ; no concatenation of 
 schemes by intriguing Jesuits, or mines of combustibles just 
 ready to explode under the people's feet. There is nothing 
 like Mr. Burke's hurricanes of eloquence, when beating up for 
 volunteers to crusade against revolutionary France, nor any 
 attempt to frighten reason from her throne that revenge might 
 take her place, nor the least intimation of a desire to subvert or 
 alter the English constitution of government. On the contrary, 
 there appear throughout his energetic pages, loyalty to mon- 
 archy, homage to truth and correct morals, and a venera- 
 tion of the laws. He seems neither a Scotchman, Irishman, 
 nor American, but the inflexible Englishman treading sternly 
 the straight, rough path of truth and constitutional duty. 
 
 Junius is a gentleman ; and when he speaks to his Sove- 
 reign, it is with studied respect ; when he alludes to the 
 unhappy King Charles, it is upon such nice and important 
 points in the life of that well-intentioned monarch, that they 
 rather indicate friendship than a wish to mortify the King. 
 Louis the Fourteenth would have made a friend of such a 
 counsellor ; and had the ill-educated Charles the First in- 
 clined his ear early to such an adviser, he might have died 
 in his palace a common death, surrounded by affectionate 
 relatives and grateful servants. Still there was something very 
 alarming in Junius, from his invisibility, and the not knowing 
 what would come next. There seems this difference between 
 the writings of Junius and the passionate effusions of Burke ; 
 the one shone like a glittering and transitory meteor in the 
 thick and troubled atmosphere of England, while the other 
 resembled more an appalling comet, — a terrific intruder from 
 unknown regions of space, that 
 
 "In dim eclipse disastrous twilight sheds 
 On half the nations ; and with fear of change 
 Perplexes monarchs. Darken'd so, yet shone 
 Above them all th'arch Junius."* 
 
 * Milton, B. 1.
 
 100 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 In such a research as ours, when demonstration halts, the 
 mind soothes itself by reposing upon the internal evidence of 
 things, as in solemn matters above the contentions of men. 
 Reading then hy this candle of the Lord within us, we perceive 
 that although genius alone produced the dramas of Shakspeare, 
 and that strange production the Vision of Dante, and the Par- 
 adise of Milton, it could not have raised up and embodied that 
 spirit of Whiggism that burns and blazes in the volumes before 
 us ; in which, beside the facts, views, and reasoning, there is dis- 
 cernible a spirit of holy zeal not unlike that which characterizes 
 the apostle Paul in a higher cause and a harder task, a zeal 
 unaided by the ordinary stimulants of fame or riches. The 
 world was not rich enough to purchase such exertions as those 
 of Paul or of Junius. 
 
 From every view of the subject, it appears that the author 
 of the Letters must be sought among the very few great men 
 of his day and country, — the Burleighs and the Sullys of the 
 kingdom ; such men alone could give lessons of wisdom to a 
 discontented nation, and its troubled King, — lessons which, 
 while they compelled attention, excited dismay, like the fear- 
 ful handwriting on the palace-walls of the Assyrian king. 
 The original conception, the first resolution, the steady and 
 dignified execution of the golden pages of Junius, are above 
 the minds of any of those men to whom they have been 
 attributed, with the exception, perhaps, of Mr. Burke. What 
 is there in the writings of Demosthenes or of Cicero that 
 exceeds them? We view the thundering Grecian, and the 
 clear-headed, indefatigable Roman, through the long shadowy 
 vista of antiquity, in which the imagination has some play, 
 tending naturally to exaggeration ; while we examine and scru- 
 tinize Junius through a near and more familiar umbrage. 
 
 To inform, to enlighten, to warn, and to advise for the best 
 a young monarch, characterized by an ungovernable self-suffi- 
 ciency, or in fewer words, by a strong will and weak judgment, 
 a king too obstinate for patient endurance, yet rather too good 
 for a second example to British kings and subjects, — to
 
 JUNIUS PAST THE NOON OF LIFE. 101 
 
 remedy the disorder, required an inspired physician ; and such 
 a one was the English Junius Brutus. The grand indication 
 was to remove something rotten in the state of Britain ; or 
 rather " to infuse a portion of new health into the constitution, 
 to enable it to bear its infirmities,'''' — a sentence uttered hy 
 Lord Chatham, and sanctified by Junius.* 
 
 There is internal evidence that the writer of the Letters 
 was a personage settled down in the steadfastness of advanced 
 life and confirmed principles, under a satiety of worldly gran- 
 deur, familiarized with royalty, acquainted with privy councils, 
 parliaments, and diplomatic affairs, and thoroughly versed in 
 the architecture of the English constitution. There is a well- 
 sustained dignity, bordering on austerity, " which gives to 
 Junius the air and authority of a great personage in disguise." 
 His experience, the result of age, shines out in his thorough 
 knowledge of the army ami navy. His age is indicated in 
 a private letter to Mr. Wilkes dated November 6, 1771, where 
 he complains that no man writes under such disadvantages as 
 himself. " I cannot consult the learned. I cannot directly 
 ask the opinion of my acquaintance, and in the newspapers I 
 never am assisted. Those who are conversant with books, 
 well know how often they mislead us, when we have not a 
 living monitor at hand to assist us in comparing practice with 
 theory." Again. " After I had blinded myself with poring 
 over journals, debates, and parliamentary history, I was at last 
 obliged to hazard a bold assertion." This is in the plaintive 
 tone of an old man, of a man of leisure, unassisted in that 
 most important point, legal information : yet, in the execu- 
 tion of his heroic task, he must have had an intellectual aid. 
 One blade of a pair of scissors by itself is useless. To cut, 
 
 * The words of the Earl of Chatham in Parliament, quoted by 
 Junius, who calls it " a brilliant expression, and full of intrinsic 
 wisdom." It has allusion to an obsolete practice among some physi- 
 cians in the 17th century, of transfusing the blood of young and healthy 
 subjects into the veins of old and diseased ones. A more enlightened 
 physiology and pathology have exploded both the theory and the 
 practice of it.
 
 102 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 they must be rivetted together. He must have had intellectual 
 as well as chirographical aid. The question is, from whom ? 
 and of what kind ? If money could have purchased it. the 
 vital secret would have been betrayed and sold for money. 
 
 A haughty spirit pervades the writings of Junius, and some- 
 times an imperious, domineering cast of mind, even when he 
 must have discovered that he was wrong, as in his hasty attack 
 on Parson Home. He sometimes uses the language of rage 
 and boiling anger in terms evidently studied and carefully 
 labored, and utters contempt in phrases highly polished, " aware 
 that a wound may be given more deeply with a burnished than 
 with a rusty blade." * In his attacks on the Duke of Grafton 
 and Lord Mansfield, he too often descends from the generality 
 of reflection which is satire, to the abuse of their persons which 
 is lampooning. It appears, however, more the result of keen 
 resentment than the voice of mortified pride. Harsh as it some- 
 time is, it partakes not of that atrabilarious malignity, that long- 
 engendered, Tiberian acrimony, which human blood alone could 
 dilute. His reprehensive manner has more the air of the 
 supernatural inspiration of a prophet, thundering in the drowsy 
 ears of stupid sinners, than the vulgar passion of a demagogue. 
 He looks down with lordly indignation and generous rage upon 
 all time-serving men, from the palace to the play-house. In the 
 midst of his political anger, he evinces an amiable solicitude 
 for the welfare of those beneath him, as towards his printer, 
 Woodfall. The observation of Pliny is thus confirmed, that your 
 gay, lively, philanthropic men, distinguished for kindness and 
 good-humor, are equally remarkable for sharpness of expres- 
 sion and severity of language, when roused to resentment from 
 a sense of injury ; and experience has ever since strengthened 
 the opinion, that mildness of disposition and benevolence are 
 very often accompanied with the sharpest tone of invective 
 against injustice and cruelty. The solicitude of Junius for 
 the welfare and respectability of that man of mixed qualities, 
 
 * Scott.
 
 JUNIUS A NOBLEMAN, RICH AND POWERFUL. 103 
 
 John Wilkes, extended even to his personal behaviour in the 
 streets. " It is your interest," says he, " to keep up dignity 
 and gravity ; beside, I would not make myself cheap by walking 
 the streets as much you do." 
 
 Moreover, Junius appears to have been in the first rank 
 of subjects, like one who had retired from high office in disgust ; 
 but who, seeing the machinery of government in disorder, and 
 operating to its own destruction, was nevertheless heartily 
 disposed to save it from utter ruin, provided the aiding hand 
 itself remained unseen ; and it was this which formed the 
 puzzling cloud that surrounded him, giving a fearful halo of 
 mystery to most things he advanced. He was indeed an 
 ingenious inquisitor. He tortured his victims alternately with 
 appalling truths, solemn doubts, and vexatious questions ; or 
 with imperfect satisfaction, just sufficient to create a thirst he 
 meant not to satisfy. Anon, he gave them partial information, 
 and inspired them with a dread of hearing more. Both courts 
 were conscious that he could raise up spirits from the vasty 
 deep of the " infamous peace." * So situated and circum- 
 stanced, he predicts events then only unfolding, and that in 
 a solemn tone of anxious solicitude, and in a style oracular. 
 Wearing the semblance of a superior being, he was frightfully 
 magnified by the magical influence of invisibility. 
 
 In what prose writer do we meet finer figures, more apt 
 allusions, or happier metaphors, especially when descending 
 from the region of his superiority, he shows us, in accents of 
 affability, the plant with its pregnant buds ; and, alluding to 
 the season, describes, in anticipation, its coming fruit whether 
 good or evil. Looking into the seeds of time, the seer actually 
 foretold which grain would grow and which would not ; and 
 we Americans have accordingly hailed him a venerable prophet. 
 
 Junius exhibits abundant evidence of his entire devotion to 
 his country. He regards England tantamount to all the rest of 
 the world, and would fain be to Britain what the god Terminus 
 
 * See Junius's Letter to the Duke of Bedford, September, 1769.
 
 104 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 was to the Romans, who, when all their other deities were 
 giving way, swore he would not stir an inch for Jupiter.* He 
 treats with qualified respect the sword and helmet; and while 
 he pays due homage to the crown and sceptre, he, now and 
 then, casts a look of displeasure, if not disdain, on the wearer ; 
 for there is a feeling too strong to be concealed, and too 
 natural to be feigned, pervading most of these addresses, which 
 distinguishes them from the mere Shakspearian efforts of genius. 
 No ! there is a pencilling that could not be bought, as could the 
 labors of Dryden and Johnson ; a manner beyond all rules of art. 
 
 Carefully polished as some of these letters are, this hides not 
 a something partaking of a morbid, or else a septuagenarian 
 fretfulness, or both, betraying the frail and feverish being, and 
 linking him to earth in despite of his boasted ethereal umbra. 
 This is discoverable in some of his private letters to Wilkes 
 and to Woodfall. Here we see him in his gown and slippers ; 
 but in his public letters he appears full-dressed, stern, and 
 without a smile. His closing letter may be an exception to 
 this remark. It is addressed to Lord Camden in terms of hiedi 
 consideration and esteem, and with evident traits of equality ; yet 
 is it calculated for effect. f It looks like the art of the history 
 painter, who sets off by contrast the odious character of an in- 
 dividual. Thus a skilful French painter,! in his picture of the 
 first murderer, has added to him the figure of a beautiful 
 woman, and two lovely children, in order to make the hideous 
 appear more horrible in the countenance of Cain. So in this 
 moral painting by Junius, he touches and retouches his picture ; 
 and by artful contrast in the composition, and deep Rembrandtian 
 shades, the figure starts horribly from the canvass, beguiling 
 the judgment through the imagination. 
 
 The style of Junius is peculiar, pure, laconic, and magiste- 
 rial ; and sometimes a provoking manner, a cross-examination 
 
 * Restitit, et magno cum Jove templa tenet. Ovid. 
 f Its object was to render Lord Mansfield odious. 
 \ David.
 
 HIS STYLE PECULIAR. 105 
 
 style, occasionally approaching to truculency. But when he 
 calls forth his full powers, as in his first Letter, his famous one 
 to the king, and a few others, then he speaks with the studied 
 caution of a Mansfield ; force, dignity, and precision pre- 
 dominate over the rules and flowers o( rhetoric. He ap- 
 pears to sit upon a rock and look down on his subject, and 
 his language is that of one who has nothing to wish for 
 himself or to fear from others. He seems not to act from 
 suggestion, advice, or agency, but his expressions of reso- 
 lution and determination come from his all-sufficient self; 
 he looks Independence personified. Did we believe entirely 
 in the ancient doctrine of the transmigration of souls, we might 
 easily imagine the soul of Brutus to inhabit the body of this 
 British Peer. In his stern principles and energetic conduct, 
 he appears another Hercules, who, having heard the lowing of 
 the beasts, straightway goes to the cave of the robber, and 
 seizing Cacas, by a strong and relentless gripe, drags him 
 forth amidst his fire and smoke to light and punishment.* 
 
 In the catalogue of great names, where between the years 
 1765 and 1770 can we find such a demi-god with his club 
 and lion's skin ? Certainly not among those guessed to have 
 been Junius. Is there, in any one of those supposed au- 
 thors of the Letters in question, a writer whose pages are 
 marked and dignified by that energetic, nay caustic style, 
 which signalizes those dread tablets at which rogues, military 
 commanders, ministers, nobles, princes, and kings trembled ? 
 Compare the corrosive-sublimate style of this ghost of Junius 
 Brutus with the liquid laudanum strains of half a dozen 
 gentlemen to whom they have been from time to time at- 
 tributed, and dismiss the notion of their competition for ever. 
 
 If sensible and learned men vary in their taste concerning 
 painting, poetry, music, and architecture, it is no wonder that 
 they differ in opinion concerning the short compositions of 
 Junius. An anecdote may illustrate my meaning. A painter 
 
 * Virgil, Mn. viii. 
 14
 
 10G CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 asked permission to copy an admired head in my possession ; 
 I consented on condition that he showed me the copy. After 
 detaining the picture a long time, he returned it ; when I asked 
 to see his copy of it. He smiled and shook his bead, — " I 
 have labored," said he, " again and again, and tried repeatedly, 
 but cannot fetch out the expression, or even the coloring of 
 the original. I have never failed to satisfy myself before with 
 other pictures. What can be the reason now ? " I replied, 
 " Because, Sir, that head, simple as it seemeth, is the pro- 
 duction of a master* intent on pleasing himself, being his 
 own countenance." Every great master, whether painter or 
 writer, has a certain inimitableness of his own. 
 
 So an adroit literary man may make a tolerable imitation of 
 some numbers in Johnson's Rambler, or some chapters of 
 Gibbon's Roman History, or any sermon of Dr. Blair ; but 
 let him try his hand on Dean Swift, Dryden, or Addison, and 
 above all on Junius ; — or to come quite up to the point at 
 once, let him read over some of the best Letters of Junius, so 
 as to make himself master of the subject without committing 
 the words to memory, shut up the book, and then write a 
 letter on the very topic, as near the matter and the style as he 
 can, and afterwards compare his imitation with the original ; 
 and he will see and feel the difference. An able and ingenious 
 writer would find less difficulty in imitating the rich and florid 
 style of Gibbon, the Rubens of British historians, than Junius, 
 their Michael Angelo.f 
 
 Disregarding, at present, the flowing drapery of Junius, 
 his style and diction, let us attend to the man himself, and 
 notice some particulars which stamp the mind of the writer, if 
 
 * Stuart. 
 
 f Some of our own ingenious political writers have now and then 
 struck out shining paragraphs very like some of the brilliant pages of 
 Burke. But the word like has a wide range. Simia quam similis 
 nobis ! How like a man is a monkey ! But this imitative little 
 creature, how unlike him who stands at the head of the visible series 
 of animated creation !
 
 HIS STYLE PECULIAR. 107 
 
 they do not indicate his rank in society. The foremost of these 
 is liis daring resolution, and invincible determination to remain 
 unknown, and the next is his power of carrying his project into 
 complete effect. This is, in my opinion at least, a weighty 
 consideration, as it confines our inquiry to a very small circle ; 
 for who among the great men of that day enjoyed a character 
 so great, so very great, as voluntarily to endure and patiently 
 allow such a deduction of fame, both contemporary and 
 historical, as the authorship of those celebrated Letters would 
 have conferred for ever on his name ? How few, how very 
 few of them would have been contented to go down to the 
 silent grave and bury there a crown that might shine as con- 
 spicuously as that which fame bestowed on Cicero ? Scrutinize 
 the British list of great men from 1755 to 1760, and from 
 that period to the year 1773, and name us the man sufficiently 
 provoked, and likewise capable of writing those masterly 
 appeals to George the Third, to his ministers, to the city 
 authorities, and to the people. The Earl of Temple was 
 replete with whig principles, had full enough ardor, inde- 
 pendence, and resentful feelings; but he wanted the talents 
 for such a display of them as Junius has made. We repeat 
 the question, — Who was so rich, so very rich in fame, so 
 wrapt up in glory, as to conclude that he could afford such a 
 subtraction from his stock of it, through a consciousness that 
 he should leave enough behind to satisfy a wise man ? This, 
 considerate reader, is not a light argument. 
 
 The tantalizing, nay, solemn truths uttered for years from 
 beneath a mask, were often pronounced in the spirit of bitter 
 invective, sharpened frequently by satire ; so was the coarse 
 satire of Chrysal, which preceded Junius about ten years ; but 
 there was as much difference between the weapons of the one 
 and of the other, as between the rude arrows of our Indians and 
 the shafts of Apollo. Those flew at random from behind 
 trees and stumps ; these never missed their aim, and came 
 from on high, rankling the wounds they made, even to mor- 
 tification. This so exasperated the objects of attack, that
 
 108 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 nothing but the protecting cloud of personal invisibility secured 
 the agent from the extremity of dire revenge ; hence every 
 thing like truth was considered secondary to safety. Junius 
 was aware that his invisibility was a vital secret. Had he 
 been discovered, whither could he have fled for shelter ? 
 This country was then part of the realm ; and sovereigns and 
 their ministers in every country upon earth were of course 
 his deadly enemies ; for the dagger, the pistol, poison, and the 
 bow-string are not so much to be dreaded as free and un- 
 shackled reason. 
 
 As Junius could not but apprehend the utmost danger to 
 his life, fame, and fortune, it is no wonder that he exercised 
 all the faculties of his mind, and feelings of instinct, to secure 
 concealment and elude discovery ; and taking every thing we 
 know, and every thing we have a right to suppose, we must 
 conclude that none but a very superior character, a man 
 fortunately situated and circumstanced, could have preserved 
 the all-important secret. I conceive that in the city of Paris 
 it would have been as impossible as in a camp of veterans ; 
 but in London, where there is no police, but where the 
 manners of the people are, in a great measure, a substitute for 
 it, the exploit was less difficult. Yet even there, allowing for 
 the liberty of the press, it will ever remain a surprising fact, 
 that such a political correspondence between an obnoxious 
 writer, feared and detested by the whole administration, and a 
 well known respectable printer, should nevertheless continue, 
 with very little or no interruption, almost three years, and after 
 all remain undetected ! 
 
 If Mr. Woodfall was ignorant of the person of Junius, it 
 seems that he knew his rank, as he approaches him with the 
 greatest deference, if not awe, as if addressing a superior 
 being. After Junius had intimated that he should write no 
 more, Woodfall addresses him thus ; " I hope you will believe 
 that however agreeable to me it would be to be honored with 
 your correspondence, I should never entertain the most distant 
 wish that one ray of your splendor should be diminished by
 
 HIS STYLE PECULIAR. 109 
 
 your continuing to write." And when Junius tells him to 
 make the most of his collection of Letters for his sole benefit, 
 he. adds, with the friendly manner and feeling of high rank to 
 an inferior, — " Let your views in life be directed to a solid 
 however moderate independence. Without it no man can be 
 happy, nor even honest." 
 
 It appears that the great unknown excited a still greater 
 awe in the imagination of the hardy Mr. Wilkes ; a sort of 
 man little disposed to bow the head or bend the knee in 
 reverence to any body or any thing. Yet in answer to a long 
 and very interesting private letter written by Junius to that 
 celebrated man in August, 1771, he betrays an awe so great as 
 to partake of a degree of profaneness. These are his words. 
 " 1 do not mean, Sir, to indulge the impertinent curiosity of 
 finding out the most important secret of the times, the Author 
 of Junius. I will not attempt, with profane hands, to tear the 
 sacred veil of the sanctuary ; I am disposed with the in- 
 habitants of Attica to erect an altar to the unknown god of 
 our political idolatry ; and will be content to worship him in 
 clouds and darkness." 
 
 This we conceive to have been the utmost reverence and 
 respect that John Wilkes could feel towards an unknown 
 superior intelligence, and to have been as heartfelt and sincere- 
 worship as any heathen ever offered up at Athens, Rome, or 
 Corinth ; and it is a curious modern specimen of what we read 
 in our admired classics. 
 
 John Wilkes was by no means an ordinary man in talents, in 
 education, and firmness of purpose, and if we view him alone 
 by himself, he grows in our estimation ; but if we compare 
 him with his unknown correspondent, he shrinks in the com- 
 parison. The three long letters written to Wilkes in August and 
 September, 1771, are, in my opinion, admirable as it regards 
 the principles and views of the writer. What do we see in 
 them? Hercules coaxing a froward child to that, which it 
 bad not mind enough to comprehend, relish, and act up to. 
 The difference between the master and the disciple is striking*
 
 110 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 After the failure of this laborious essay on the part of Junius, 
 he appears to have given up Wilkes and all the " horned 
 cattle " of the city, and to have retained a good opinion of 
 none but Mr. Sawbridge. He writes thus to his printer when 
 about ceasing his hazardous labors — " I am weary of attacking a 
 set of brutes whose writings are really too dull to furnish me with 
 even the materials of contention." And again, about the same 
 time, and on the same subject — " Try Mr. Wilkes once more. 
 Speak for me in a most friendly but firm tone, that I will not sub- 
 mit to be any longer aspersed." Junius found that he h'mself 
 was attacked in the newspapers by the city sub-factions, and he 
 suspected that the Rev. John Home was the writer; and there- 
 fore he hints to Woodfall that it was hardly honorable that Mr. 
 Wilkes should leave him alone to defend himself, but that he 
 ought to take up the cudgel in his support, and therefore he sub- 
 joins in a tone of disgust, — " Between ourselves, let me recom- 
 mend to you to bemuch on your guard ivith patriots ." In another 
 private letter to his printer, — " I meant the cause, and the public. 
 Both are given up. I feel for the honor of this country, when 
 I see there are not ten men in it who will unite and stand 
 together upon any one question." He speaks to Wilkes of 
 the insidious arts of Mr. Home, and urges " the total and 
 absolute renunciation of Mr. Home." This is said in a long 
 letter to the "patriot" of 21 August, 1771, which Junius 
 concludes thus ; — " This letter, Sir, is not intended for a 
 correct or polished composition ; but it contains the very best 
 of Junius's understanding;" and winds up with saying, — "I 
 am heartily weary of writing," he. In another private letter 
 to Mr. Wilkes, September 7th, he says, — " A man, who hon- 
 estly engages in a public cause, must prepare himself for 
 events winch will at once demand his utmost patience, and 
 rouse his warmest indignation. I feel myself, at this moment, 
 in the very situation I describe ; yet from the common enemy 
 I expect nothing but hostilities against the people. It is the 
 conduct of our friends that surprises and afflicts me." We 
 refer the reader to the History of the Minority, printed in
 
 HIS STYLE PECULIAR. HI 
 
 London in 17G6 ; and the publications of the day between 
 1768 to 1771, when Lord Chatham was incessantly abused 
 for accepting a peerage. Junius wished to make use of 
 Wilkes and of Parson Home in the serious business of 
 reformation, but was repeatedly thwarted by the envy and jeal- 
 ousy of the one, and the vanity of the other. When addressing 
 the first he curbs his indignation and says, — " But my zeal, 
 I perceive, betrays me; 1 will endeavour to keep abetter 
 guard upon my temper, and apply to your judgment in the 
 most cautious and measured language." He then comments 
 in his masterly manner upon the resolutions and doings of the 
 Supporters of the Bill of Rights convened at the London 
 Tavern, July 23, 1771 : in which he appears like a man of 
 great experience and mature judgment, talking to children 
 who could not or would not understand him. He suspected 
 Mr. Home to be the Marplot of his plan. 
 
 The difference in the ability of the two writers, Junius and 
 Wilkes, will appear even on a slight examination. The latter 
 says to his unknown correspondent, — " These three days I 
 have had the shivering fits of a slow, lurking fever, [a strange 
 disorder for Wilkes,] which makes writing painful to me. 
 I could plunge the patriot-dagger in the heart of the tyrant of 
 my country, but my hand would now tremble in doing it." 
 Again, speaking of revising and preparing for publication cer- 
 tain productions of the supporters of the Bill of Rights, he 
 says to Junius, — " At all times I hate taking in other people's 
 foul linen to wash ! " Of what loose and flimsy texture are 
 those letters from the trembling hand of the hero of the " North 
 Briton," contrasted with the firm and everlasting warp and 
 woof of those by Junius ! whose work is beautiful as strong, 
 uniting admirable materials with high finish and splendor. 
 
 Amidst venality and corruption, Britain's proud metropolis, 
 the emporium of the world, the largest, richest, and freest 
 city in Europe, comported herself nobly, notwithstanding some 
 aberrations in a few of her officers, partly owing to an infection 
 with which she had been inoculated by Lord Bute, and partly
 
 112 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 from a morbid jealousy engendered among themselves ; the 
 symptoms of which ran highest in the Rev. John Home. 
 Had he and his quondam friend Wilkes possessed genuine 
 moral greatness, he would have followed the wise counsel 
 of Junius as expressed in his three admirable letters already 
 cited, particularly as it respected the preference of Alderman 
 Sawbridge for the next Lord Mayor. Mr. Home, afterwards 
 better known by the name of Tooke, without the imputation 
 or suspicion of corruption, lost half his weight by turning 
 a deaf ear to the advice of Junius given through the medium 
 of Mr. Wilkes. 
 
 John Home Tooke had talents, industry, learning, and 
 ambition ; but his emulation, taking a low direction, involved 
 him in perplexities, which, for that time, ruined him with his 
 party. He had to do with men of business, who judged better 
 but wrote worse than the the Parson. The ability to contrive, 
 plan, and display upon paper, is a different matter from that 
 adroitness in execution, with which men of business are familiar. 
 If a little learning be a dangerous thing, a great deal of it is a 
 cumbersome thing, impeding the march; and the possessor of it 
 is like a debilitated modern recruit staggering under the armour, 
 accoutrements, arms, and provision of an old Roman soldier. 
 Or, to use a better figure, John Home Tooke was at that time a 
 weed, that is, a fine plant out of his proper place ; hence he with- 
 ered ; and when afterwards transplanted into his proper soil at 
 Purley, he grew finely, and flourished as all the world has seen. 
 We shall have occasion to speak of this fortunate man hereafter, 
 and shall only remark now, that Junius held in high honor the 
 city of London ; but the faction, or rather sub-faction in it 
 in 1771, nearly exhausted his stock of patience. He con- 
 sidered the reverend and learned gentleman just mentioned as 
 the soul of it ; and this roused his indignation, and carried 
 him a little too far in his expression of it ; for he imputed to 
 Home a corrupt court influence, from which he was entirely 
 free. This gentleman was constitutionally honest and able ; 
 but not in his right situation. How few, how very few are the
 
 HIS WRITINGS PATRIOTIC AND PURELY ENGLISH. H3 
 
 instances among ourselves, where clergymen who have de- 
 scended from the pulpit into the dusty arena of politics, have 
 not been there bewildered, blinded, and lost ? A man cannot 
 serve two masters. 
 
 Great ability is manifested in Junius'' s first three private let- 
 ters to John Wilkes, Esq. ; and in his fifty-ninth letter addressed 
 to the printer of the Public Advertiser, on the 5th of October, 
 1771. I consider the sentiments contained therein as the 
 native, heartfelt, genuine, unbought language of English 
 patriotism, principles which no man can counterfeit, and which 
 Junius found it so hard to smother, and so hazardous to 
 express. In his public letters, he inculcates this principle, — 
 " That we should not generally reject the friendship or services 
 of any man, because he differs from us in a particular opinion." 
 He adds, — " I care not with what principles a new-born 
 patriot is animated, if the measures he supports are beneficial 
 to the community." " The spirit of the Americans may be 
 an useful example to us. Our dogs and horses are only 
 English upon English ground ; but patriotism, it seems, may 
 be improved by transplanting." * 
 
 " To complain of the age we live in, to murmur at the 
 present possessors of power, to lament the past, to conceive 
 extravagant hopes of the future, are the common dispositions 
 of the greatest part of mankind, the necessary effects of the 
 ignorance and levity of the vulgar ; but nobody, I believe, will 
 consider it merely the language of spleen or disappointment, if 
 I say there is something alarming in the present conjuncture. 
 There is hardly a man in or out of power who holds any other 
 language. That government is at once dreaded and con- 
 temned ; that the laws are despoiled of all their respected 
 and salutary terrors; that their inaction is a subject of ridicule, 
 and their exertion of abhorrence ; that rank, and office, and 
 title, and all the solemn plausibilities of the world, have lost 
 
 * How far does this sentiment differ from the well-known opinion 
 of the Earl of Chatham respecting the Americans? 
 
 15
 
 1 1 4 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 their reverence and effect; that our foreign politics are as 
 much deranged as our domestic economy ; that our depend- 
 ences are slackened in their affection, and loosened from their 
 obedience ; that we know neither how to yield nor how to 
 enforce ; that hardly any thing above or below, abroad or at 
 home, is sound and entire; but that disconnection and confusion 
 in offices, in parties, in families, in parliament, in the nation, 
 prevail beyond the disorders of any former times ; these are 
 facts universally admitted and lamented." Such were the 
 sentiments and the language of the celebrated Edmund Burke 
 in 1770.* 
 
 It should be borne in mind that this deplorable condition of 
 things was in the reign of a moral king, in the morning of life, a 
 man of business more than of pleasure, addicted to no vicious 
 habits, whose domestic virtues and rules of justice reflected 
 honor upon his high station. What shall we say in explanation 
 of that state of perplexedness which embarrassed the government 
 of George the Third ? Juvenal has said it for us, — " Nullum 
 Numen abest, si sit Prudentia." In the early part of his life, 
 and in the seclusion of his palace, there was no Prudentia or 
 Minerva to listen to ; and the consequence was, it first 
 opened the mouth of Junius, then raised up a Burke, and 
 finally engendered a Peter Pindar, and every one of them 
 operated more or less powerfully on the public mind. 
 
 It was at this gloomy and ill-boding period of their nation- 
 al affairs that Junius called, in the tone and accents of 
 an aged and weary patriot, on Lord Camden saying — " My 
 Lord ! I turn with pleasure from that barren waste, in which 
 no salulary plant takes root, no verdure quickens, to a char- 
 acter fertile, as I willingly believe, in every great and good 
 qualification. I call upon you in the name of the English 
 nation, to stand forth in the defence of the laws of your 
 country, and to exert, in the cause of truth and justice, those 
 great abilities, with which you are entrusted for the benefit of 
 mankind." 
 
 * Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents.
 
 MR. BURKE'S OPINION OF HIM. ] 15 
 
 The task assigned to Lord Camden by Junius was against 
 Lord Chief Justice Mansfield ; but Camden recoiled probably 
 in despair from an undertaking in which a Junius had failed. 
 We would here remark, in passing, that Lord Camden was the 
 most intimate political and private friend of Lord Chatham, 
 and executor of his last will. 
 
 Is it not prominently remarkable that Junius, who called 
 on John Wilkes to aid him in the great cause of the people, 
 never once calls upon the Earl of Chatham, that steady and 
 consistent whig, that stern defender of constitutional principles, 
 that renowned and incorruptible statesman, and most powerful 
 orator, to lend a helping hand to save the ship of state in her 
 sad plight and dangerous situation ? Is it not almost as sur- 
 prising that the great reformer never once names the Earl of 
 Temple, Chatham's brother-in-law and confidential friend, a 
 whig of the first stamp, the heroic combatant of " general 
 ivar rants,'''' without whose exertions, and pecuniary aid, John 
 Wilkes might have sunk into obscurity ? And is it not 
 somewhat strange that Lord Chatham, copious as the matter 
 of his speeches is, never once utters the name of Junius, 
 even when defending his printer Woodfall ? • Neither Mr. 
 Burke nor Lord North was so fastidious. The first spoke 
 of him in the House of Commons thus — " How comes this 
 Junius to have broke through the cobwebs of the law, and to 
 range uncontrolled, unpunished through the land ? The myr- 
 midons of the court have been long, and are still, pursuing him 
 in vain. They will not spend. their time upon me, or you, or 
 you, [nodding to several.] No ! they disdain such vermin, 
 when the mighty boar of the forest, that has broke through all 
 their toils, is before them. But what will all their efforts 
 avail ? No sooner has he wounded one, than he lays down 
 another dead at his feet. For my part, when I saw his attack 
 upon the King, I own my blood ran cold. I thought he had 
 ventured too far, and there was an end of his triumphs. Not 
 that he had not asserted many truths by which a wise prince 
 might profit. It was the rancor and the venom with which I
 
 HG CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 was struck. In these respects the North Briton is as much 
 inferior to him, as in strength, wit, and judgment. But while 
 I expected in his daring flight his final ruin and fall, behold 
 him rising still higher, and coming down souse upon both 
 Houses of Parliament. Yes ! he did make you his quarry,* 
 and you still bleed from the wounds of his talons. Nor has 
 he dreaded the terrors of your brow, Sir.f He has attacked 
 even you ; he has, and I believe you have no reason to tri- 
 umph in the encounter. In short, after carrying our royal 
 eagle in his pounces, and dashing him against a rock,J he has 
 laid you prostrate. Kings, Lords, and Commons are but the 
 sport of his fury. 
 
 " Were he a member of this House, what might not be 
 expected from his knowledge, his firmness, and integrity ? 
 He would be easily known by his contempt of all danger, by 
 his penetration, by his vigor. Nothing would escape his vigi- 
 lance and activity. Bad ministers could conceal nothing from 
 his sagacity ; nor could promises, nor threats induce him to 
 conceal any thing from the public." 
 
 The staid and even-tempered Lord North was not too 
 fastidious to mention the terrific boar of the woods. He 
 said of him, " When factious and discontented men have 
 brought things to this pass, why should we be surprised at the 
 difficulty of bringing libellers to justice ? Why should we 
 wonder that the great hoar of the wood, this mighty Junius 
 has broke through the toils, and foiled the hunters ? Though 
 
 * QuaiTy. Game flown at by a hawk ; hence the phrase — he made 
 game of him. The word is unknown among the people of America, 
 where the royal sport of falconry is not yet introduced. 
 
 f Sir Fletcher Norton, Speaker of the House of Commons, had 
 remarkably large eyebrows jutting over his optics like a pent-house. 
 This is a fair specimen of Burke's ordinary oratory, and of Lord North's 
 also. 
 
 \ We know of no European bird large enough and strong enough 
 to carry away a great man and dash him against a rock. Must not 
 the orator have meant the American Condor ? the largest and strong- 
 est fowl of the air ; its wings being 18 feet from tip to tip.
 
 LORD NORTH'S OPINION OF HIM. H7 
 
 there may be, at present, no spear that will reach him, yet he 
 may be, some time or other, caught. At any rate, he will be 
 exhausted with fruitless efforts ; those tusks which he has 
 been whetting, to wound and gnaw the constitution, will be 
 worn out. Truth will at last prevail. The public will see 
 and feel that he has either advanced false facts, or reasoned 
 falsely from true principles ; and that he has owed his escape 
 to the spirit of the times, not to the justice of his cause." 
 
 These are timid sentiments, plaintive and childish notes, to 
 come from the lips of a prime minister of Old England, the 
 man who had the ignorance and presumption to declare out 
 aloud, that he would bring humiliated America to his feet ! 
 
 From the speeches just cited we learn Mr. Burke's opinion 
 of the extraordinary powers, integrity, patriotism, and intrepid- 
 ity bordering on temerity, of Junius. It is evident that he 
 regarded him, though invisible, with feelings of more than simple 
 wonder, — with astonishment approximating to dread. His 
 opinion corroborates the one which we have already advanced, 
 that the English public in search of Junius did not look high 
 enough. It is apparent that Burke looked up at his terrific 
 eagle. 
 
 As to " My Lord North," so everlastingly famous in this 
 country, his speech betrays marks of trembling anxiety in 
 every sentence. He moves softly, as if he were afraid of 
 waking " the great boar of the woods," who had been 
 whetting his terrible tusks before he went to sleep.* It is 
 equally evident that Lord North did not look down upon 
 Junius. It is difficult to preserve that gravity which becomes 
 our years, whenever we think of certain individuals to whom 
 the authorship of those celebrated Letters has been, from 
 time to time, attributed. 
 
 The deep solicitude of Junius for the public welfare is 
 strikingly apparent in his last private letter to Mr. Woodfall, 
 
 * We recommend this subject to some of the history painters in 
 this new country, where they abound.
 
 118 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 in which he said — " If I saw any prospect of uniting the City 
 once more, I would readily continue to labor in the vineyard. 
 Whenever Mr. Wilkes can tell me that such an union is in 
 prospect, he shall hear from me. Quod si quis existimat me 
 aut voluntate esse mutatd, aut debilitatd virtute, aut animo 
 fracto, vehementer errat.* Farewell." 
 
 Here it seems, the " mighty Junius," so called by my Lord 
 North, hung up his bow. The two missile darts sent after this 
 date, seem thrown by an old and feeble arm and with a careless 
 aim ; like his Memoirs of Lord Barrington, every way un- 
 worthy his pen. His final private letter to Woodfall, of Janu- 
 ary 19, 1773, is more like himself; he says in it — " I have 
 seen the signals thrown out for your ' old friend and corre- 
 spondent.' Be assured that I have good reason for not 
 complying with them. In the present state of things, if I were 
 to write again, I must be as silly as any of the horned cattle 
 that run mad through the city, or as any of your wise aldermen. 
 I meant the cause and the public. Both are given up. I feel 
 for the honor of this country, when I see that there are not ten 
 men in it who will unite and stand together upon any one 
 question. But it is all alike, vile and contemptible. You 
 have never flinched that I know of; and I shall always rejoice 
 to hear of your prosperity." 
 
 Here is a deliberate and solemn leave-taking, with ample 
 reason why he should write no more ; and this determination is 
 handsomely acquiesced in by honest Woodfall, in his answer 
 to his unknown but highly venerated correspondent. Yet what 
 futile arguments have been, from time to time, obtruded on the 
 public as to the cause of his ceasing from his labor. The 
 cessation was natural and for sufficient reason ; why then 
 make a mystery of it, seeing his retreat was masterly, without 
 loss, and facing the enemy to the very last mancauvre ? 
 
 * But if any one believes me to be changed in ivill, weakened in 
 integrity, or broken in courage, he errs grossly.
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 OF THE LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 
 
 I am aware that a favorite theory has a tendency to bias the 
 judgment, and sweep us away, like a strong tide, from the 
 anchorage of reason into the open sea of uncertainty ; yet if 
 our theory be the fruit of long reflection, and founded upon infer- 
 ences drawn from independent sources of evidence, it is more 
 satisfactory than an assumed hypothesis. After a thoughtful se- 
 ries of years on this subject of our inquiry, and reiterated exam- 
 ination of facts as they rose ; and after disciplining speculation by 
 internal as well as external evidence, I had concluded and 
 settled down many years since in the opinion that William 
 Pitt, Earl of Chatham, was the author of the celebrated 
 Letters under the signature of Junius. Nay, furthermore, 
 that no other man had feelings just like them, and moreover 
 that no other man was capable of writing them ; and as length 
 of time, has, every year, added strength to this opinion, I am 
 now to assign my reason for it. But this will lead me to give 
 
 A Sketch of the Life and Character of WILLIAM 
 PITT, EARL OF CHATHAM. 
 
 Benigno Numine.* 
 
 This celebrated man was born in London, in the year 
 1708. He was esteemed at the University of Oxford a good 
 scholar, a keen disputant, and by some a poet. But his ruling 
 passion was the tented field, which he would have indulged 
 had not a cruel hereditary gout, that seized on him even before 
 
 * By the favor of Providence. Motto of the noble house of Chatii a m .
 
 120 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 he left Eton school, clipped the wings of his martial ambition, 
 permitting him, however, to range the most fertile regions of an- 
 cient and modern literature. But for this hopeless disease, the 
 world might have seen him a Hannibal, a Marlborough, or 
 another Napoleon, and Britain deprived of the honor of rearing 
 the second, nay the first orator on the records of fame. 
 
 Who can look into the seeds of time as it regards the destiny 
 of man ? Who will say that it was not all for the best, that 
 young Pitt's energetic soul should be confined to a crazy case, 
 unsuited to its warlike propensities, and that he, who other- 
 wise would have blazed among the greatest of conquerors, was 
 allowed only to shine the first of orators? The great and 
 stern commander is, however, discernible throughout his 
 eventful life. Quick-sighted, prompt, sagacious, fearless, 
 haughty, and persevering, he never ceased to be a hero, a 
 Hercules, a demi-god in wielding the powers of a great nation, 
 and making the most powerful bend to his sway. 
 
 Among his most intimate companions at Eton school were 
 Lord George Lyttleton, Henry Fox (afterwards Lord Hol- 
 land), Sir Charles Hanbury Williams, and Henry Fielding.* 
 There was an intimacy between Mr. Pitt, Mr. George 
 Grenville, and Lord Lyttleton ; for several years they always 
 sat together in the House of Commons. 
 
 The gout drove young Pitt from the University before he 
 could take a degree in the arts, and compelled him to travel 
 on the continent in quest of health and mental improvement ; 
 and this so cultivated his mind, says Lord Chesterfield, that he 
 acquired a great fund of premature and useful knowledge. 
 His first speech in Parliament was in April, 1736. On his 
 return to England, having kept his gout at bay by travelling, 
 he accepted a cornet's commission in the horse-guards ; and 
 at the age of twenty-seven entered Parliament, where he shone 
 a prodigy of manly eloquence, and virtuous independence, in 
 
 * Author of that masterly picture of the English character and 
 manners, so well known by the title of Tom Jones.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 121 
 
 opposition to the minister Sir Robert Walpole ; and to his 
 sore annoyance, who, it is said, once exclaimed — " How shall 
 we muzzle this terrible cornet of horse ? " Sir Robert was 
 thought to have tainted his own judgment, and betrayed his 
 want of sagacity, by depriving the young aspirant of his mili- 
 tary commission. Mr. Pitt proved afterwards that he knew 
 the science of political resentment much better than the 
 minister. If you cannot kill a roaring lion at once, beware 
 how you wound him. Several years after, this wounded and 
 chafed lion " lay couching head on ground with cat-like 
 watch," and sprang upon this very Sir Robert Walpole, when 
 magnified in the eyes of a giddy world by an earldom, and 
 dragged him forth to answer for his deeds of corruption before 
 the nation, and indeed all Europe and America ; for the eyes 
 of all the world had long been turned on that shrewd minister 
 of two Hanoverian kings of England, George the First, and 
 Second. 
 
 Mr. Pitt's gouty malady was only arrested for a time by his 
 travels, but not subdued ; it recurred on his return home ; and 
 so entirely checked his martial ardor as to change its current 
 from the camp to the senate. It appears that all his early 
 exertions bore the stamp of a superior genius. Nor was this 
 all. His industry and application were commensurate with 
 his extraordinary powers of mind ; and he so sedulously cul- 
 tivated a rare assemblage of talents, that he was able to utter 
 whatever his great soul conceived, better than any other man 
 that ever spoke the English language, or perhaps any other. 
 Before he was six and thirty years of age, his eloquence 
 foretold his future fame. 
 
 When Sir Robert Walpole found that he could neither 
 bribe nor otherwise " muzzle the terrible cornet of horse," he 
 directed his hirelings and dependants to browbeat the young 
 Demosthenes. He doubtless remembered the thundering 
 orator of whom Philip stood more in fear than of all the rest of 
 Greece. But they met their match, and more than their 
 
 16
 
 122 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 match, in the undaunted courage and superior force and skill of 
 " the terrible cornet of horse." 
 
 In the year 1740, Mr. Walpole, brother to the minister, 
 thought fit to reply to one of Mr. Pitt's speeches, by saying — 
 " Formidable sounds and furious declamation, confident asser- 
 tions and lofty periods, may affect the young and inexperienced ; 
 and perhaps the honorable gentleman may have contracted 
 his habits of oratory by conversing more with those of his own 
 age, than with such as have had more opportunities of acquir- 
 ing knowledge, and more successful methods of communicating 
 their sentiments." And he made use of some expressions, 
 such as " vehemence of gesture," " theatrical emotion," &c. 
 applying them to Mr. Pitt's manner of speaking. When Mr. 
 Walpole sat down, young Pitt rose slowly up and said, — " The 
 atrocious crime of being a young man, which the honorable 
 gentleman has, with such spirit and decency, charged upon 
 me, I shall neither attempt to palliate nor deny ; but content 
 myself with wishing that I may be one of those whose follies 
 may cease with their youth, and not of that number who are 
 ignorant in spite of experience. 
 
 " Whether youth could be imputed to any man as a re- 
 proach, I will not assume the province of determining. But 
 surely age may become justly contemptible, if the opportuni- 
 ties which it brings have passed away without improvement, 
 and vice appears to prevail when the passions have subsided. 
 The wretch who, after having seen the consequences of a 
 thousand errors, continues still to blunder, and whose age has 
 only added obstinacy to stupidity, is surely the object either of 
 abhorrence or contempt, and deserves not that his grey hairs 
 should secure him from insults. Much more is he to be 
 abhorred, who, as he advances in age, has receded from virtue, 
 and becomes more wicked with less temptation ; who prostitutes 
 himself for money which he cannot enjoy, and spends the 
 remains of his life in the ruin of his country. 
 
 " But youth is not my only crime ; I have been accused of 
 acting a theatrical part ; a theatrical part may either imply
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 123 
 
 some peculiarities of gesture, or a dissimulation of my real 
 sentiments, and an adoption of the opinions and language of 
 another. In the first sense the charge is too trifling to 
 be confuted, and deserves only to be mentioned that it may 
 be despised. I am at liberty, like every other man, to use 
 my own language ; and though I may perhaps have some 
 ambition, yet, to please this gentleman, I shall not lay my- 
 self under any restraint, nor very solicitously copy his dic- 
 tion or his mien, however matured by age or modelled by 
 experience. If any man shall, by charging me with theat- 
 rical behaviour, imply that I utter any sentiments but my 
 own, I shall treat him as a calumniator, nor shall any pro- 
 tection shelter him from the treatment he deserves. I shall, 
 on such an occasion, without scruple, trample upon all those 
 forms, in which wealth and pride always entrench themselves ; 
 nor shall any thing but age restrain my resentment ; age which 
 always brings one privilege, that of being insolent and supercili- 
 ous without punishment. 
 
 " But with regard to those whom I have offended, I am of 
 opinion, that if I had acted a borrowed part, I should have 
 avoided their censure ; the heat that offended them is the ardor 
 of conviction, and that zeal for the service of my country 
 which neither hope nor fear shall influence me to suppress. 
 I will not sit unconcerned while my liberty is invaded, nor look 
 in silence upon public robbery." 
 
 See here the seed of an extraordinary indigenous plant ; the 
 germ of a rare and splendid flower and uncommon fruit. Nay, 
 who does not see in this early specimen of invective the future 
 full-blown orator ; the matter, the nature, the stern manner, and 
 inflexible temper of a minister, who, while he reasoned down 
 opposition, carried his victories with the rapidity of a mountain 
 torrent; and, when political principle and personal resentment 
 combined, could treat an aged member, brother of the prime min- 
 ister, like a miscreant. Nor did the contest end there ; but 
 while he proceeded in a more pointed and still severer strain, bor- 
 dering on abuse, a member alike aged with Mr. Walpolc, called
 
 124 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the young orator to order, Pitt turning upon him, exclaimed — 
 " If this be to preserve order, there is no danger from the most 
 licentious tongue ; for what calumny can be more atrocious, or 
 what reproach more severe than that of speaking without any 
 regard to truth ? Order may sometimes be broken by passion 
 or inadvertency, but will hardly be re-established by a monitor 
 like this, who cannot govern his own passion whilst he is 
 restraining the impetuosity of others?" * 
 
 These examples show us the man at an early stage of his 
 career ; a young Hercules, impetuous, overbearing, haughty, 
 and fearless, mighty in eloquence, and when provoked prone 
 to insolence, without regarding station, wealth, or age; in a 
 word, a very Junius. It seems from every account, written 
 and traditional, that the personal appearance of Mr. Pitt was 
 the happiest possible for a great orator. His countenance, 
 his eye, his voice, his collected and fearless manner partaking 
 of sternness and savouring of defiance, qualified, however, by 
 a peculiarly fascinating demeanour of good breeding, and 
 ever corresponding exactly with his subject, whether persua- 
 sive, indignant, objurgatory, or dictatorial, all constituted 
 him the very soul and substance of eloquence. His occasional 
 sickliness, his constitutional infirmity, even his gout aided his 
 oratory. With one arm in a sling, he seemed, while speaking, 
 as if able to direct Great Britain, and awe Europe with one 
 hand. He very early acquired a certain inimitable manner of 
 expressing strongly his indignation, or his contempt ; so that 
 he became often an object rather of dread than affection to his 
 contemporary legislators. He seldom restrained this propensity 
 towards men of the Walpolean school, and too often, perhaps, 
 gave way to a vituperative style, and a torrent of invective 
 resembling rancor ; particularly towards Murray, Lord Mans- 
 field. These endowments, acquirements, and talents gave 
 him ascendency in Parliament before he was forty years of 
 age, which grew into authority, and enabled him before he was 
 
 * See Almon's Anecdotes of Pitt, Earl of Chatham.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 125 
 
 fifty to bias greatly and, at times, to sway both King and Parlia- 
 ment. Nor is this to be much wondered at, when we consider 
 the education and mere military character of George the 
 Second, who, though quick and passionate, was placable and 
 manageable. Mr. Pitt with a steady temper, strong will, 
 sound judgment, and courage of every kind that never faltered, 
 set all in motion, and could regulate the machine of his 
 own making with the unerring power of a creative and con- 
 trolling mind ; and, whenever occasion required, adorned all 
 his movements with the most polished manners, and that 
 without confusion or hurry ; for cool judgment was very often 
 made to wait upon the promptness of his energetic mind. 
 
 However, Mr. Pitt's character was so purely English that 
 he could not give in to all the Hanoverian politics of his 
 sovereign. He thwarted his wishes in Parliament, derided 
 his electoral troops, opposed his system of German politics 
 generally, and was particularly active and successful in per- 
 suading Parliament to send home the Hanoverian and Hessian 
 troops brought into the island of Great Britain to help the 
 natives quell the Scotch rebellion in the year 1745. Pitt's 
 opposition to the aged monarch's long-fostered partiality to 
 Hanover, and to Germany generally, exasperated dislike to 
 hatred, so that he could not hear Mr. Pitt named without 
 visible emotion. Yet he continued to declare in Parliament 
 manfully and steadily that that state was alone worthy of 
 being denominated a sovereign and independent state, which 
 relies upon its own strength, without having recourse to troops 
 of another nation to preserve its existence. He therefore 
 denounced, in his usual strong tone and powerful manner, the 
 pityful policy of introducing foreign troops whether Russian 
 or German. 
 
 In opposing the views of George the Second, Mr. Pitt could 
 not avoid crossing the path of his favorite son the Duke of 
 Cumberland, commander-in-chief of all the land forces of 
 England. Yet the noble-minded Duke was constrained to say 
 to Mr. Fox, afterwards Lord Holland, " I do not know Mr.
 
 126 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Pitt ; but by what you tell me Pitt appears to he what is 
 scarce, — a Man, and that man an Englishman." 
 
 Notwithstanding his aversion, the king was told by the wise 
 men about him that he must call Mr. Pitt into office, that his 
 general character and popularity loudly demanded it. And 
 he was not long after appointed Paymaster of the land forces ; 
 and in this important, and till that time very lucrative office, he 
 manifested a punctuality, correctness, and disinterestedness 
 rarely found in the annals of kingdoms. He would receive no 
 more pay than the exact legal establishment ; and accordingly 
 paid a subsidy to the king of Sardinia entire without the usual 
 deduction of a certain per-centage as a perquisite. This es- 
 tablished his already high character for integrity throughout 
 Europe, and added to its great weight in England. In that 
 country, and in these United States, popularity is a mighty 
 engine that generally operates the public benefit, unless it 
 should be, like that of Sir Robert Walpole's, the fruit of 
 bribery, or when acquired by an ambitious military chieftain. 
 
 What added to the perplexity of those who liyed by princes' 
 favor was the advanced age of the monarch, whilst his son 
 Frederic, Prince of Wales, was in the vigor of life and health. 
 Whether to sit most respectfully under the solemn gloom of 
 the setting sun, or, in the dubious twilight, hail its rising, beams, 
 puzzled the will, and sadly embarrassed ambitious aspirants 
 and professed courtiers ; even Mr. Doddington knew not, at 
 times, which way to bow. However the court of the heir- 
 apparent at Leicester-House was more crowded than that of 
 St. James. Considering the advanced age of the father and 
 the middle age of the son, it is no great wonder that the Heli- 
 olaters outnumbered the Threnodians. Lord Temple and 
 Mr. Pitt appeared occasionally at both levees. 
 
 But the face of affairs was suddenly changed by the very 
 unexpected death of the Prince of Wale's. An event so un- 
 looked-for filled the opposition with the utmost consternation 
 and confusion ; for the adherents of his late Royal Highness had 
 planned a systematic opposition to the government of his
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 127 
 
 father, which was to operate under the direction of that hopeful 
 son, and his more able princess. Inferior as prince Frederic 
 undoubtedly was in point of intellect, he never amassed 
 private treasure, nor adopted any sinister advice with a view to 
 collect wealth.* He perhaps never looked so far forward. We 
 are unable to pronounce the character of Prince Frederic. 
 We can only infer that he was neither wise nor prudent ; for 
 he would discuss freely the future system of his government, 
 when his father's death should give him the crown. How 
 unlike the character of Britain's present monarch George the 
 Fourth ! f 
 
 The spouse of Prince Frederic, and mother of King George 
 the Third, was a German Princess ; and to her the whigs 
 attributed some of the most glaring instances of their national 
 disgrace. The private history of such exclusive people is not 
 to be depended on at this distance. Junius abhorred her ; 
 and Earl Waldegrave, governor of Prince George, afterwards 
 George the Third, despised her: J But who of us can by 
 sifting find out the truth in characters so out of the way of 
 common life. Through our camera however it does seem to 
 us strange, that a renowned nation, slow in judgment, rich in 
 wisdom, glorious in her constitution of government, haughty 
 and insulated, and most mighty in the richness of her com- 
 merce, should, in her customs, stoop so low, as to take from 
 among the poor and petty powers of the Continent, wives for 
 their kings and princes, after suffering as they have, from the 
 conduct of most of them. 
 
 * It may be superfluous, and it may not, to say to the American 
 reader, that Prince Frederic was the eldest son of George the Second. 
 His only brother was William, Duke of Cumberland ; a man of consid- 
 erable talents, and the favorite of his father, as well as of all the 
 nation except the Scotch. 
 
 f Our journals have just announced the death of this monarch ; and 
 the emblems of our own sovereignty have expressed our regret by their 
 position half-mast high on the shipping 1 in our harbours. 
 
 J See Waldegrave's Memoirs.
 
 128 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Is there sufficient reason for this strange custom ? Is there 
 sound policy in the usage ? Beside, what a dark shade does 
 this practice cast upon the ladies of the first rank in England ! 
 It has heen suggested that it was to secure and put beyond 
 hazard Britain's Protestant religion. Indeed ! On what sort 
 of foundation is that church built which needs such slender 
 props ? On what can the church itself be erected, which is 
 endangered by giving to the sovereigns of England, queens of 
 British birth and education ? Do they in the land of our 
 forefathers think, that foreigners would feel a deeper interest 
 in guarding the throne, and maintaining the rights of English- 
 men, than natives themselves? Is it likely they would be more 
 disposed to inculcate on the minds of their offspring the 
 peculiar principles of the constitution ; or that they would at 
 any time support it with more steady bravery than native 
 Britons ? At this distance from that noble political planet these 
 things appear marvellous in our eyes. 
 
 Mr. Pitt was no friend to these foreign connexions. He 
 opposed with all his might certain subsidiary treaties with 
 Russia, and with certain German princes, for a supply of 
 troops for the defence of Hanover. But Mr. Pitt as Paymas- 
 ter, and Mr. Legge as Chancellor of the Exchequer, united in 
 refusing payment until these treaties made by the King had 
 been approved by Parliament. And for their non-compliance 
 both were dismissed from office ; and a new administration 
 was formed, who obtained from Parliament a vote for £100,000 
 for Russia, and £54,000 for the Landgrave of Hesse.* But 
 this administration, got up chiefly by his Royal Highness the 
 Duke of Cumberland, was to the utmost degree unpopular. 
 
 In the year 175G France began to march large bodies of 
 troops towards the sea-coast, and threatened an invasion of 
 England, than which nothing strikes more terror into those 
 islanders, from the cabinet to the watermen upon the Thames. 
 Soon after the important island of Minorca w r as taken by the 
 
 * See chap. xii. of Almon's Anecdotes of Lord Chatham.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 129 
 
 French, and Admiral Byng, who had nothing to do with it, 
 shot for it. A general dismay settled upon England, and 
 foreign troops were again called in, which increased the 
 public discontent ; for many weak people thought the kingdom 
 was given up to Hessians and Hanoverians. The storm of 
 public indignation increasing, the frightened ministry hastened 
 to give in their resignations. In this situation of things the 
 people turned their eyes on William Pitt, as their sure 
 iEgis of protection, and it did their judgment credit. Amid 
 their general depravity, inertness, frivolity, cowardice, and 
 want of confidence in their government, one man appeared to 
 stand their rock of defence, and that man was an invalid upon 
 crutches, — such is the power of mind over matter. 
 
 Mr. Pitt, a consummate orator, and all-powerful in Parlia- 
 ment, knew how to speak better than any other man, and 
 he knew how to be silent, which saving-knowledge Edmund 
 Burke never attained. In the session of Parliament which 
 began on the 11th of January 1753, and ended 7th June in the 
 same year, Mr. Pitt was silent. In that which commenced on 
 15th of November, 1753, and terminated in April, 1754, he 
 took no part in the debates. In the same year the Parliament 
 was dissolved. The new Parliament met in November, in 
 which session Mr. Pitt moved for leave to bring in a bill for 
 the relief of certain grievances endured by the out-pensioners 
 of Chelsea Hospital, whom he represented as cruelly oppressed 
 by an improper mode of paying their pensions. The poor, 
 disabled veterans who were entitled to that charity were, he 
 said, oppressed by a number of wretches who supplied them 
 with money in advance, they paying the most exorbitant 
 interest to certain usurers, who supplied them with small sums 
 to relieve their pressing needs. The bill was brought in by an 
 unanimous vote, and the aged and wounded soldiers were 
 delivered from a flock of harpies. This exertion shows the 
 true character of the man, and the fact ought to be added 
 
 17
 
 130 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 to his everlasting monument, if its weight of laurels will allow 
 room for it.* 
 
 Wide-spreading and solid as was the reputation of William 
 Pitt, and great as was his influence, he increased both by marry- 
 ing a noble lady, sister of Richard Earl Temple, and of the 
 Right Hon. George Grenville, well remembered in this country 
 as the putative father of the obnoxious stamp-act. This lady 
 resembled her husband in the towering faculties of her mind, 
 and in the assiduous cultivation of them, and was among 
 women what her husband was among men. We desire the 
 reader to bear in mind this happy circumstance in the life of 
 Lord Chatham. 
 
 But to return to the perplexed monarch, who was left too 
 much alone with very few friends and disinterested advisers. 
 Among these the Earl of Waldegrave appears to have been the 
 most estimable as a personal friend ; for, after ceasing to be 
 the governor of George Prince of Wales,f he withheld himself 
 from public office though urged to it by the King. The Duke 
 of Newcastle, a generous nobleman of a singular character, 
 always hovered about the throne, ready to do any thing and 
 every thing ; and him the king authorized to apply to Mr. Pitt, 
 with assurances that he was perfectly reconciled to taking him 
 into his service. But the haughty commoner answered his 
 application somewhat abruptly, that he would accept of no 
 situation whatever under his Grace of Newcastle. This was 
 on the 20th of October, 1756. The Duke of Devonshire was 
 commissioned by the King to wait on Mr. Pitt, who was at 
 Hayes, his country-seat in Kent, and offer a carte-blanche, except 
 as to Mr. Henry Fox, whom the King wished to keep in his ser- 
 vice ; but Pitt gave a positive refusal to the royal request. J Upon 
 
 * See Junius's celebrated eulogy on Lord Chatham, Letter LV. 
 
 f Afterwards King George the Third. 
 
 \ Mr. Pitt's stubborn rejection of Mr. Fox is a mystery to many, 
 they having been school-fellows, and a friendship subsisting between 
 them all their lives. We shall explain this hereafter, when speaking 
 of the partiality of Junius for Lord Holland.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 131 
 
 this Mr. Fox immediately resigned his secretaryship. His 
 resignation produced confusion, and the Duke of Newcastle 
 and the rest of his Majesty's servants resigned also. This 
 distressed the King extremely, and left him in a situation not 
 to be envied. He complained bitterly to those about him 
 of their ill treatment. 
 
 " At the earnest request of the King, the Duke of Devonshire 
 took the Duke of Newcastle's place at the treasury, and again 
 waited on Mr. Pitt at Hayes, with a message from his Majesty, 
 requesting to know the terms upon which he would come 
 into office. Mr. Pitt gave his arrangement. Himself to be 
 Secretary of State ; Lord Temple, First Lord of the Ad- 
 miralty ; Mr. Legge, Chancellor of the Exchequer ; the Great 
 Seal to be in commission ; George Grenville, Treasurer of the 
 Navy; and James Grenville, a Lord of the Treasury."* 
 
 At Mr. Pitt's desire, Charles Pratt Esq., afterwards Lord 
 Camden, was made Attorney General. 
 
 What an idea does this convey of the mighty power and 
 the virtuous influence of William Pitt. His vast popularity 
 was a different thing from that which elevated John Wilkes, 
 and inflated him to a monstrous size, frightful to the eye 
 of reason and good order. Pitt had built for himself a solid 
 reputation grounded upon virtue, honor, an honest patriotism, 
 a character so respectable as in a manner to compel a monarch 
 who hated him, to solicit him repeatedly to become his prime 
 minister. With this great weight of character, and with a 
 matchless power of eloquence, Mr. Pitt became Prime Minis- 
 ter. In other words, he took the helm of a crazy ship in a 
 tempestuous season, with a miserable crew, and but three or 
 four good officers ; and yet, in due time, no ship of state, since 
 the ark of Noah, ever sailed the ocean so gallantly. 
 
 When Pitt came into office, he stipulated certain conditions 
 which were very extraordinary. He insisted that Lord Anson 
 should be excluded from the cabinet ; nor was that all, he in- 
 
 * Almon's Anecdotes of Chatham.
 
 132 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 sisted that he himself should have the correspondence with the 
 officers of the navy instead of the board of admiralty, and the 
 King consented to it. Under this arrangement, Mr. Pitt 
 wrote the instructions to the Admirals of the fleet, and to the 
 Commodores and Captains, and these were signed by at least 
 three of the Lords of the Admiralty, while a sheet of white 
 paper covered the writing, so that they were kept in ignorance 
 of what they signed, while all despatches and letters came to 
 Mr. Pitt, who was Secretary of State, and at the same time 
 Prime Minister. Lord Anson retained his place as First 
 Lord of the Admiralty, under Pitt's limitation, and Mr Fox 
 took the pay office ; and with these officers Pitt commenced 
 his glorious administration in the year one thousand seven 
 hundred and fifty-s even ; the brightest period of English history 
 since the Revolution of 1688.
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM, CONTINUED. 
 
 Let us look back on some of the ground we have run too 
 rapidly over. 
 
 George the Second had little or no affection for his eldest 
 son, and it would seem not much for his grandson, who was 
 never taught to respect him. Royal families, all the world 
 over, have less affection for each other than those of untitled 
 rank. The aged monarch had been deserted by his ministers 
 in a very unfeeling manner. In this state of perplexity, the 
 venerable Duke of Devonshire, knowing that the Sovereign 
 needed both consolation and advice, asked an audience ; in 
 the course of it, he entreated the King to recall Mr. Pitt and 
 place him at the head of the administration, as the only man, 
 who, by his extraordinary talents, unbounded popularity, and 
 integrity, could redeem the government from confusion. It is 
 said that the King shed tears on recounting the unfeeling 
 treatment of his late ministers, declared himself willing to 
 follow the advice of Devonshire, and therefore requested the 
 Duke to make application to Mr. Pitt, as we have related. In 
 the conference, Pitt said to his Grace, " My Lord! I am sure 
 I can save this country, and nobody else can." This would 
 have been arrogance from the lips of any other man. But he 
 knew the state of the country better than any one else j and he 
 knew also his own powers and means. This enabled him to 
 say to the King on his first private audience, " Sire, give me 
 your confidence, and 1 will deserve it." What can convey a 
 better idea of the venerable monarch than his prompt reply, — 
 " Deserve my confidence, and you shall have it." There is a
 
 134 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 degree of sublimity in the sentiment of both. " George the 
 Second, though not possessed of brilliant talents, yet, to a strong 
 firmness of mind, he added a long experience of men and 
 public affairs, with a sufficient share of penetration to distinguish, 
 even in his present short acquaintance with Mr. Pitt, that he 
 w T as a bold and intelligent minister ; qualities which were per- 
 fectly agreeable to the King, because the want of personal 
 courage was not amongst his defects." * The minister per- 
 ceived, from time to time, that he could manage his master to 
 the benefit of his country ; and during the remainder of the 
 King's life they acted together in harmony, and the nation saw 
 and rejoiced at the union and cordiality of opinion between the 
 Sovereign and his popular minister upon all public measures. 
 
 Before Pitt assumed the administration of the government, 
 Britain had sustained losses and incurred disgraces in Europe, 
 in Asia, and America. All public transactions were reduced 
 to party feelings. This perplexed and discouraged officers 
 abroad, who knew not how to act, and they became of course 
 languid and dispirited in their military operations, and in their 
 civil governments. In this country, the French were en- 
 croaching every day upon us. Their soldiers were superior to 
 the British in discipline, and they had better officers, and 
 beside that, the friendship of the Indians. The defeat of the 
 over confident General Braddock, and the shameful inactivity 
 and incapacity of Lord Loudon, left open a wide avenue to the 
 conquest of these colonies. 
 
 When the two leaders of the late administration, the Duke 
 of Newcastle and Henry Fox, were constrained to quit their 
 hold on the government, they left enough of the leaven of the 
 Leicester-House faction behind to disturb and thwart the new 
 minister. The press teemed with abuse against him ; even 
 with sarcasms on his bodily infirmities. If the old court at 
 St. James's was restored from its gloom by the presence of 
 Pitt, the new one at Leicester-House was considered by some 
 
 * Almon's Anecdotes.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM.] 135 
 
 no better than an impure nest in which was hatched a brood of 
 evil designs against English and American liberty. A coterie 
 assembled there unfriendly to the old monarch and his minister. 
 The state of public manners was deplorable. Heroic virtue 
 seemed to have fled, leaving in its place indolence, a sickliness 
 of mind, a lack of spirit, a love of money with their miserable 
 offspring, a habit of gaming carried on with a view to indulge in 
 laziness, finery, and effeminacy ; and this engendered venality, 
 or an utter disregard to every thing but self-interest. This 
 deterioration of mannners and principles was bred and nurtured 
 in that hot-bed of corruption formed by Sir Robert Walpole. 
 It appears strange that a hardy, stubborn, courageous people, 
 as the British actually are, should have sunk into this effeminacy, 
 after giving such evidence of bravery and patient endurance in 
 the times of Charles the First and of Cromwell, and in the 
 reign of Queen Anne. But so it really was. A sunless state 
 of peace generated foul excrescences, and produced a morbid 
 condition in the body-politic. The people of England were 
 so sunk below their former character as to be absolutely dis- 
 mayed at the incursion of a few half-naked, ill-appointed 
 Scotchmen in 1745, and had recourse to foreign troops for 
 protection. Pitt derided this step with his utmost powers of 
 sarcasm ; and proclaimed that state alone a sovereign state, 
 " qui suis stat viribus, non alieno pendet arbitrio" 
 
 The condition of things was at that time deplorable. A 
 powerful writer of that day,* says, — " Let us, with due abase- 
 ment of heart, acknowledge that the love of country is no 
 longer felt, and that, except in a few minds of uncommon 
 greatness, the principle of public spirit exists not. That 
 mighty principle, so often feigned, so seldom possessed, which it 
 requires the united force of upright manners, generous religion, 
 and unfeigned honor to support. So infatuated are we in the 
 contempt of this powerful principle, that we deride the inhabi- 
 
 * Rev. Dr. Brown's Estimate of the Manners and Principles of the 
 Times. London, 1757. (Seventh Edition in 1758.)
 
 1 36 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 tants of a sister kingdom for their national attachments and 
 regards." 
 
 That this was not the petulent effusion of a mere closet 
 philosopher, an opinionated priest, ignorant of the world and of 
 himself, who wantonly libelled his contemporaries, will appear 
 pretty evident from the language of Mr. Pitt himself, who* 
 about the same time, declared in Parliament his firm belief that 
 there was an aversion in the navy and military commanders 
 against any vigorous exertion whatever. He affirmed that 
 scarcely a man could be found with whom the execution of 
 any one plan, in which there was the least appearance of danger, 
 could, with confidence, be trusted ; that a shameful dislike to 
 the service every where prevailed ; and that the contractors for 
 the army and navy cared for little else than their own pecuniary 
 advantage. The first military operations on the coast of 
 France after Pitt came into office confirmed these assertions. 
 The reverend author just cited, when commenting on this 
 lamentable state of things, says, — " Necessity and necessity 
 alone must, in such a case, be the parent of reformation* 
 Whenever this compelling power, necessity, shall appear, then, 
 and not till then, may we hope that our deliverance is at 
 hand. Effeminacy, rapacity, and faction will then be ready to 
 resign the reigns they would now usurp ; one common danger 
 will create one common interest ; virtue may rise on the 
 ruins of corruption ; and a despairing nation yet be saved by 
 the wisdom, the integrity, and unshaken courage of some great 
 Minister." From what this powerful and solemn writer 
 says in another part of his treatise, we have reason to conclude 
 that he had Mr. Pitt particularly and individually in view. 
 
 Our great statesman, beside his rare talents and tried integri- 
 ty, had a silent, lofty demeanour which sometimes offended 
 English noblemen, and displeased foreign ambassadors. It 
 seems not to have been the ostentatious arrogance of a Cardi- 
 nal Woolsey ; but the laconic language and behaviour of the 
 man of multifarious business, partaking more of the military 
 commander, than the pride of high political station. Yet was he
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. J 3-7 
 
 remarkable for observing every rule of prescribed etiquette, and 
 every mark of deference towards George the Second. We 
 are told that no infirmity occasioned by his excruciating gout, 
 could ever prevail on him, though requested, to be seated in 
 his intercourse with the King. This was very far from dis- 
 pleasing a royal personage educated in the rigid rules of the 
 German military-school etiquette. 
 
 That Mr. Pitt was a sort of terrific object to the King and 
 his household may be inferred from an anecdote related by the 
 eccentric Horace Walpole, afterwards Lord Orford ; who 
 says, that all the Hanoverian party had strange notions of the 
 truculence of Pitt's virtue, and gives an almost ludicrous story 
 in proof of it. That " on the 21st of October, the palace, not 
 at all the scene of such actions, had one morning its solitude 
 alarmed by an early visit of Mr. Pitt. The pages of the back- 
 stairs were seen hurrying about and crying — Mr. Pitt, Mr. Pitt 
 wants Lady Yarmouth, [George the Second's mistress.] 
 The great stranger told her that he made her this abrupt 
 morning visit to explain himself, lest it should be thought he 
 had not been sufficiently explicit. He then repeated his 
 exclusion of the Duke of Newcastle [in his stipulation with 
 the Duke of Devonshire], and gave some civil though obscure 
 hints, — as if in losing his Grace, Hanover might not lose all 
 its friends," &c. This anecdote is pregnant with information. 
 It hangs on a pivot. It related to the memorable negotiation 
 with Mr. Pitt, for his return to office, when he pretended that 
 he would trust the tongue of none else but the bosom friend of 
 the monarch. No doubt the German lady was charmed with 
 the politeness of the great man, and with his confidence in her. 
 From that moment and for ever must she have chansred her 
 opinion of the terrific Mr. Pitt, and pronounced him the mirror 
 of graciousness and civility.* 
 
 * Such was the domestic agitation, when the great and turible man 
 came to speak with the confidante of Majesty, that all was in a flutter. 
 It was like the sudden appearance of a hawk in a barn-yard ; cocks
 
 138 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Pitt's ever memorable administration, which commenced in 
 the summer of 1757, was attended with the greatest advantage 
 to the nation. Disaster had followed disaster in Germany. 
 The Duke of Cumberland at the head of a fine army had been 
 defeated at Hastenbeck, and finally compelled to surrender to 
 the French, and sign the convention of Closter-seven.* En- 
 gland's powerful ally, the King of Prussia, was defeated, and his 
 entire destruction appeared inevitable. As to this country, 
 nothing was done or even attempted by Lord Loudon with his 
 large land force, nor by Admiral Holburne, one of the severest 
 persecutors of Byng, with a fleet of seventeen ships, while the 
 French had nineteen. In the East Indies they were equally 
 unsuccessful. While sad reverses were experienced abroad, 
 the internal condition of England was no better ; scarcity was 
 added to disorder. What a task had Pitt before him ! Yet 
 he ventured to say, — / can save this country. But it was not 
 until 1758 that the operations of his great mind were manifest- 
 ed to the world. 
 
 With extraordinary powers, Pitt entered the perilous road of 
 reformation, amidst an host of domestic enemies, who were 
 looking after him for evil. If he appeared in some respects a 
 dictator, he mixed a judgment, prudence, and wisdom with his 
 vigor, which secured to him the unanimous voice of Parliament, 
 and swelled the tide of his popularity. This, with an uninter- 
 rupted course of success in his military achievements, awed into 
 silence the remnants of the Leicester-House faction, and Pitt 
 was at one and the same time, the man of the people, and the 
 pride of the crown. He was an illustrious example of the 
 maxim that knowledge is power. 
 
 In the midst of frivolity, indolence, and venality, the proud 
 feelings natural to the British nation were severely stung by the 
 
 and cockerels, old hens, chickens, ducks and ducklings, all running in 
 a fright. 
 
 * The articles of this convention were fulfilled ahout as well as we 
 fulfilled the convention of Saratoga, when General Burgoyne surren- 
 dered his army to the Americans in October, 1777.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 139 
 
 keen reproaches of the minister in the House of Commons ; nor 
 were they less mortified at the cogent remarks of certain able 
 and zealous moral writers. Political pamphlets and moral 
 tracts were rare seventy years ago compared with the present 
 day, and attracted then more attention. These had their good 
 effect ; and they, with Pitt's eloquence, awakened the army, the 
 navy, and the representatives of the people in Parliament from 
 their dreams of indolence ; when all, operating together, roused 
 the slumbering energies of a luxurious race, who had been not 
 a little injured by the frivolity and effeminacy of the court of 
 Louis the Fifteenth : for though perpetual enemies, the French 
 gave the ton to the English then, as the English give it now to 
 the French (1830). An ostentatious nobility and the gambling 
 part of the gentry appeared to feel the reproaches from the 
 senate, the press, and the pulpit ; while those in the lower 
 ranks were touched by the keen satire of the drama, and by 
 the moral pencil of Hogarth ; and others were awakened to 
 recollection and remorse by the zeal of a new and meritorious 
 sect denominated Methodists, under their two celebrated apostles 
 Whitefield and Wesley. The London community started back 
 with shame and affright from the mirror thus held up to them. 
 
 In this state of morals, commerce lost, in some measure, its 
 wonted spring. The old Hanoverian King was but little 
 acquainted with that vital circulation of the heart's blood of old 
 England, while his minister, Pitt, knew thoroughly the first, 
 second, and third concoction of it, and he therefore watched 
 the health of Britannia with the anxious solicitude of a parent, 
 and the skill of a great physician. And in this respect our 
 admiration of the capacity, ability, and industry of the minister 
 is increased at every view of his wonderful powers of intellect 
 and of action, especially when we take into consideration the 
 untoward materials on which he had to operate. 
 
 " It is a peculiar praise of Mr. Pitt," says his biographer,* 
 " that in him were concentrated several powers of the most 
 
 * Mr. Thackeray.
 
 140 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 opposite description, any one of which is sufficient to distinguish 
 its possessor, and the union of which in one man has generally- 
 been deemed impossible. In him, intense powers of application 
 were joined to the quickest perception, and the most brilliant 
 imagination to the soundest judgment. He astonished Europe 
 as much by the energy of his measures, as he shook the senate 
 of Great Britain by the thunders of his eloquence. As a min- 
 ister his whole attention was devoted to the interests of his 
 country, and perhaps history shows nothing equal to the system 
 of intelligence, the vigor of counsels, and the promptitude and 
 success of execution, which marked his administration. It was 
 now that the strenuous system of Mr. Pitt began to produce its 
 effects. As he had taken, in a great measure, the superinten- 
 dence of every department of government upon himself, his 
 authority and example now began to excite in others a proper 
 sense of their own responsibility. When they saw the minister 
 regular and indefatigable in his country's service, they also 
 were naturally impelled to adopt similar habits of application. 
 The generous were actuated by the noble ambition of the 
 minister, the mean and selfish knew that they had to deal with 
 one who would call them to a severe account for any dereliction 
 of their duty." 
 
 One of the first objects of Mr. Pitt's attention was the 
 protection of these colonies from the encroachments of the 
 French. But before he attempted conquest abroad, he took a 
 bold step at home, by sending out of the island every one of 
 those regiments of Hanoverians and Hessians imported by 
 George the Second to defend England against his Continental 
 and Caledonian enemies. To supply their place he proposed 
 to call out, train, and organize the militia, so regulated and 
 established as to allow with safety the sending fleets and armies 
 to make conquests in distant parts of the world. He used to 
 call their fleet " our standing army'''' ; and the army " a little 
 spirited body," so improved by discipline that that discipline 
 was worth five thousand men. " If," said he in Parliament, 
 i c you take care to discipline the farmer, the day-laborer, and
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 141 
 
 the mechanic, each of these may become a good soldier, and 
 always prepared to defend the country. It is dangerous to 
 our liberties, and destructive to our trade, to encourage great 
 numbers of our people to depend for their livelihood upon the 
 profession of arms." While planning and encouraging the 
 militia system, he paid due attention to improving the state of 
 the army and the navy. .Both soon felt they had a new 
 master, who knew the duties of his own nominal station, and 
 the obligations of theirs. He scrutinized with a keen eye 
 every part of their conduct, and caused every officer to do his 
 duty. The whole nation perceived the warmth of his spirit, 
 and the military experienced his electric fire even in this remote 
 region where I am now writing. Patriotism rose from the 
 couch of luxury, and sleepy ambition dreamt of buckling on its 
 armour. 
 
 No one understood better the maxim of Lord Bacon, that 
 " Method is the soul of science,''' 1 than Mr. Pitt. His habits of 
 order and arrangement did much, and his example more. 
 Though at times grievously tormented with gout, he was inde- 
 fatigable, regular, and punctual, and he took care to exact 
 those qualities from all under him. He not unfrequently gave 
 orders from his bed, and issued important military directions 
 when he could not use hand or foot. He was a strict econo- 
 mist of time. He avoided all ceremonious visits and formal 
 introductions. He declined levees, dinner and supper parties, 
 and all such moths of time, health, and business ; and the 
 result was a bright and beautiful procession of affairs. Industry 
 led the van, order maintained the centre, and despatch closed 
 the rear without a straggler. 
 
 It has been said that the British ministers resident at foreign 
 courts, during Pitt's administration, acknowledged the wonderful 
 exactness with which all communications were made to them, 
 and the clearness and perspicuity with which all their instruc- 
 tions were expressed ; an example of which may be found in 
 his instructions to and correspondence with Mr. Hans Stanley in 
 1761, respecting the preliminaries of peace with France. Sir
 
 142 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 James Porter, who passed the principal part of his life in a 
 diplomatic character, often declared to his friends, that during 
 Mr. Pitt's administration there was such a correct knowledge, 
 and so active a spirit pervading all the departments of state 
 and the concerns of government, and such a striking alteration 
 in the manner as well as the matter of the official communica- 
 tions, that these circumstances alone would have convinced 
 him of Mr. Pitt's appointment or resignation, had he received 
 no other notice of the event.* 
 
 In the year 1758 the British arms were successful in every 
 quarter of the globe. Despatch, confidence, clear information, 
 and victory, proceeded from the master-mind of Pitt, who en- 
 joyed the entire confidence of his Sovereign and of the whole 
 Parliament. The almost lost honor of Britain was recovered, 
 and her natives awakened to a recollection of their former char- 
 acter. Great as were the successes of the year fifty-eight, 
 those of the year seventeen hundred fifty-nine were greater. 
 It may be called the year of unanimity and victory. 
 
 Yet in this year of splendid conquests the seeds of discord 
 were sown by that mischievous hand which every English- 
 man ought to execrate, and every American forgive. It 
 was owing to that never-failing source of dissension and strife 
 in little minds, the patronage of places, in which Lord Bute 
 interfered. He told the Duke of Newcastle, that he came to 
 him in the name of all those on that side of the administration, 
 meaning the Leicester-House party, who thought they had as 
 good a right to recommend as any other party whatever. It 
 was an attempt to injure Mr. Legge, Chancellor of the Ex- 
 chequer, a highly valued friend of Mr. Pitt, and a great favorite 
 of the people, to accomodate one of Lord Bute's family. From 
 this small beginning* rose an opposition which shook the nation 
 to its extremities, and finally divided the Empire. 
 
 We have already glanced at the drowsy condition of things 
 before Pitt was called to the helm. George the Second had 
 
 * Almon's Anecdotes of the Earl of Chatham.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 14 
 
 o 
 
 now arrived at that age of man when business is a burden, res- 
 olution flags, and tranquillity is the summum bonum, yet without 
 any remarkable diminution of his judgment. France was at 
 war with England, and Spain betrayed her intentions of joining 
 in it, while the spirit of the English seemed in a measure 
 evaporated. In such a lulling atmosphere it is no wonder that 
 the military dosed on their arms, and the navy rested on their 
 oars, while the nobility and gentry were taxing their invention 
 to find out new amusements. 
 
 Such was the stagnant state of affairs when William Pitt 
 blew the blast of war in their ears, and roused the old British 
 spirit from its slumber. Its clangor was heard across the wide 
 Atlantic, and echoed back from these American shores. 
 
 " With joy we view'd the waving ensigns fly, 
 And heard the trumpet's clangor pierce the sky." 
 
 The success which followed in Europe, in Asia, and in 
 America, rendered the latter part of the reign of the second 
 George gloriously memorable, and justified Pitt in saying to 
 the Duke of Dorset, " I am sure, my lord, 1 can save this 
 
 COUNTRY." 
 
 Here follows a mere catalogue of captures, or epitome of the 
 Conquests achieved in Pitt's administration.* 
 
 1757. 
 
 " The Hanoverians and Hessians were sent home, and a 
 well regulated militia established ; by which the enemy saw, 
 that we were so far from wanting foreign troops to protect us, 
 that we could afford to send the national troops abroad. 
 
 The foundations were laid of the subsequent conquests. 
 
 Fleets and armies were sent to Asia, Africa, and America. 
 
 1758. 
 Shipping destroyed at St. Malo. 
 
 * Taken from " Anecdotes of the Life of the Right Hon. William 
 Pitt, Earl of Chatham," published by Almon.
 
 144 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Bason and shipping destroyed at Cherburg. 
 
 Emden recovered from the French. 
 
 Senegal taken. 
 
 Louisbourgh, and the Isles of Cape Breton and St. John's, 
 
 taken. * 
 
 Fort Frontenac taken ; and Fort Du Quesne taken. 
 
 Fort and Island of Goree taken. 
 
 Massulipatam taken. D' Ache's fleet defeated. 
 
 French army defeated at Crevelt. French fleet under Du 
 
 Quesne taken by Admiral Osborne. 
 
 French fleet drove ashore at Rochefort by Sir Edivard 
 Haivke. 
 
 1759. 
 
 French fleet under De la Clue taken by Admiral Boscawen. 
 
 Guadaloupe, Marie Galante, Desirade, he, taken. 
 
 Siege of Madras raised. Surat taken. 
 
 Niagara, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point taken. 
 
 The city of Quebec taken. 
 
 Complete defeat of the French fleet in the Quiberon bay. 
 
 French army defeated at Minden. 
 
 Shipping destroyed at Havre. 
 
 1760. 
 
 Thurot killed, and his three frigates taken. 
 French army defeated at Warburgh. 
 
 Montreal taken. Frigates, stages, and stores destroyed in 
 Chaleur bay. 
 
 All Canada subdued. 
 Dominique and Dumet taken. 
 
 1761. 
 
 Pondicherry taken; and all the French power in India de- 
 stroyed. Belleisle taken. French army defeated at Felling- 
 hausen. 
 
 * Great assistance was furnished by New England forces and com- 
 manders.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 145 
 
 1762. 
 
 Martinico taken. Granada, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent, and 
 the Havana, after Pitt's resignation, yet in consequence of his 
 plans. 
 
 To these conquests of territory must he added the destruc- 
 tion of the French marine, commerce, and credit ; France lost 
 the following ships of war, which composed nine tenths of her 
 royal navy : namely, 
 
 Forty-four ships of the line, viz. four of 84 ; eleven of 74 ; 
 two of 70 ; seventeen of 64 ; two of 60 ; two of 56 ; one of 54 • 
 and five of 50. 
 
 Sixty-one frigates, viz. four of 44 ; two of 40 ; eighteen of 
 36 ; two of 34 ; fifteen of 32 ; one of 30 ; one of 28 ; two of 
 26 ; eight of 24 ; two of 22 ; six of 20. 
 
 Twenty-six sloops of war. 
 
 Besides the advantages derived from all these conquests and 
 captures, Mr. Pitt left the late thirteen British Colonies in 
 North America, in perfect security and happiness ; every inhab- 
 itant there glowing with the warmest affection to the parent 
 country. At home all was animation and industry. Riches 
 and glory flowed in from every quarter." 
 
 On such an accession of wealth, power, and reputation to the 
 Romans, triumphal arches and superb columns would have 
 arisen in the " eternal city," to astonish after-ages with her 
 glory ; and to record the fame of the man by whose special 
 counsel and energy such a series of conquests had been achiev- 
 ed : and in the kingdoms of modern Europe, riches and the 
 highest honors would have been heaped on him who had been 
 a prime minister of such renown. Instead of that, pamphlets 
 were written by hired writers of the King's party, and in- 
 dustriously circulated to brand him as an apostate and deserter, 
 with every term of reproach, that malice could apply or deprav- 
 ity suggest ; and every art and method was practised in order 
 to change the public opinion respecting the glory of Pitt's 
 measures, the honor of his character, and the purity of his con- 
 duct. Lord Bute's faction dreaded his return to power, and 
 19
 
 146 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 therefore nothing was left untried to destroy his popularity ; and 
 on his being created Earl of Chatham, their diabolical arts in 
 some measure succeeded. Had this been the work of the 
 whigs, it might not have been so surprising ; but it was the base 
 language of the Leicester-House faction. Newspaper essays, 
 oral scandal, and every other channel to the public ear, were 
 employed in calumniating the new Earl of Chatham. — Smol- 
 let* Mallet, Francis, Home, Murphy, and Maudit, were the 
 chief instruments used to effect in England what in some other 
 countries is often perpetrated by poison, f Such was the rela- 
 tive situation of the subject of this sketch. 
 
 The first year of Pitt's war was enough to discourage any 
 other man. It was marked with laziness, discord, weakness, 
 and dejection. Impediments were thrown in his way by the 
 followers of the Duke of Newcastle and Lord Bute, yet he 
 so far overcame them all that in the second year he frowned 
 down discord, shamed cowardice, gave aid and encouragement 
 to weakness, and chased away despondency. We should bear 
 in mind, that want of virtue was not only the characteristic 
 of the British ministry, but of the age, of which the contempo- 
 rary government of Louis XV. was another striking instance. 
 
 It is no wonder that the incessant clamor of the waste of 
 public money and Pitt's peerage and pension, raised by 
 hireling writers, should at length slacken the strong current of 
 his popularity. But it soon returned to its former channels 
 with increased force, which was nobly expressed in an ad- 
 dress by the city of London ; and cordially echoed by the 
 populace, as the following anecdote evinces. It has been 
 
 * Dr. Smollet was among celebrated writers what Tenters was 
 among artists, an exact painter of low life and mean characters. His 
 forte was the burlesque. 
 
 f " The sum paid to these and other hired writers, during the first 
 three years of the reign of George the Third, exceeded a hundred 
 thousand pounds : and the printing charges amounted to more than 
 twice that sum. And as to the few who might attempt to undeceive 
 the public, there was a political Judge (Lord Mansfield) ready to punish 
 their temerity." — Almon.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 147 
 
 customary for the Kings and Queens of England to go in grand 
 procession and dine in Guildhall on the next ensuing Lord 
 Mayor's day after their coronation. On this occasion the minis- 
 ter was honored, in all the streets through which he passed, with 
 the most enthusiastic tokens of applause. The people clung 
 about his carriage, uttering shouts of joy, while gentlemen and 
 ladies in the balconies and windows waved their hats and hand- 
 kerchiefs. The courtiers reported that his Majesty betrayed 
 signs of displeasure, that the respect paid to Mr. Pitt was greater 
 than that shown to himself. What added to the uneasiness of 
 royalty was the unanimity of Parliament in support of Pitt's 
 warlike measures, and the enormous sum (twelve millions sterl- 
 ing) voted to carry on the war. From that time the destruc- 
 tion of his popularity was the principal object of Lord Bute 
 and his superiors. It was an eye-sore ; — it was an object too 
 splendid to be looked at without giving pain ; and we, in this 
 distant region, have thought that the peerage and the pension 
 went far towards curing the evil eye ; and that it was a strong 
 mark of the monarch's characteristic policy. Thoughout all 
 nature, what an animal lacks in strength is made up in cun- 
 ning or venom. 
 
 On the 9th of October, 1761, Mi* Pitt gave in his resignation 
 to the King, and was thereupon created Earl of Chathamrwhh 
 an annuity of three thousand pounds sterling. On the same 
 day, Earl Temple, keeper of the King's privy seal, resigned 
 that office. 
 
 Henceforward we are to view Lord Chatham as a member of 
 Parliament only, with no other influence than his great char- 
 acter, matchless talents, spotless integrity, and overpowering 
 oratory. He doubtless found and felt the change. If obsequi- 
 ousness ceased to follow him, and confidence stood aloof, it was 
 occasioned by no alteration in his sentiments or change in his 
 principles. As a member of the House of Lords, not one of his 
 former political associates in the Commons could impeach his 
 conduct or his virtue, or reproach him for relaxation in the 
 great cause of the people. On the contrary, he never exerted
 
 148 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 himself to greater effect. But the influence of corruption to 
 feed avarice and vanity, was every where discernible. In their 
 House of Representatives homage was paid to the distributor 
 of rewards, and the predominant desire was to get into a lu- 
 crative station, or to remain in possession of what they en- 
 joyed. 
 
 It was in October, 1760, that King George the Second un- 
 expectedly expired. He dropped dead on the floor from, lite- 
 rally speaking, a broken heart,* with no one near him, as 
 suddenly as if shot ; and that without any previous illness 
 whatever. One of the latest historians adds, — " weltering on 
 the floor. "f 
 
 Notwithstanding his general good character as a brave, hon- 
 orable, just, and well-intentioned man, few regretted his death. 
 Subjects become tired of a long reign ; and the Britons, whose 
 ruling passion is novelty, are more apt to be impatient than 
 most other people. They felt its tediousness before Mr. Pitt 
 took the helm. The vigor, activity, and success of his ad- 
 ministration dissipated, for a time, the drowsiness occasioned 
 by an octogenarian sovereign, and that perplexing state of am- 
 biguity which never fails to take place between the rising and 
 setting sun of a nation, when it is neither clear day nor dark 
 night, but a puzzling twilight. In such a season young Princes 
 are apt to lose the right way, and old monarchs to see dimly. 
 It is moreover a trying situation for ministers, domestic gov- 
 ernors, and young courtiers. Whoever takes the lead must 
 go before those highly privileged mortals ; and dull and posi- 
 tive dotage, and rash, inexperienced juvenility, are equally 
 conceited of their powers and jealous of direction. 
 
 " As to the successor of George the Second," and we 
 choose to cite the words of a reputable and intelligent British 
 writer, J " the effects of the wickedness of his advisers have 
 
 * A rupture of one of its ventricles. 
 
 f History of the Reign of George III., by Robert Bisset, LL. D. 
 London, 1803. 
 X Mr. John Almon was an eminent Bookseller in London, enjoying
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 149 
 
 been, and are still too deeply felt to be described in any terms 
 adequate to the injuries committed. Posterity, in a subsequent 
 age, [he might have added, or in another country where the 
 English is vernacular,'] when truth may be spoken, and the 
 motives of men laid open, will be astonished at the conduct 
 of their ancestors at this period." — " Notwithstanding this 
 confirmed state of modern depravity, Truth will continue to 
 have her worshippers ; and it may be presumed that they will, 
 in the present age, as they have in former ages, survive the 
 advocates of corruption and falsehood. It is to them only 
 that impartial history can address herself; from them only 
 she can expect protection. The betrayer of his country, and 
 the destroyer of public liberty, whether supported by a Com- 
 modus, or protected by a Faustina, may endeavour, by the 
 assistance of the slavish instruments of law, to intimidate and 
 to strangle her voice ; but conscious that she has Truth for 
 her shield, she ventures upon a task that will give a new com- 
 plexion to the public events of one of the most interesting pe- 
 riods in the annals of Great-Britain." 
 
 a very extensive correspondence, and the oracle of the times for news, 
 particularly what related to this country. His vendible Library was 
 the resort of men of the first consequence, — a kind of literary ex- 
 change, where convened, not only members of the House of Commons, 
 but men in higher station. Earl Temple was much attached to him ; and 
 to his Lordship he dedicated his Revieiv of Pitt's Administration. He 
 likewise published Anecdotes of the Life of the Right Hon. William 
 Pitt, Earl of Chatham, with his Speeches in Parliament, evidently 
 under the patronage of the Dowager Countess of Chatham, and her 
 brother Lord Temple, and also by the assistance of Lords Lyttelton, 
 Fortescue, and Carysfort, the Right Hon. W. G. Hamilton, Right Hon. 
 R. Rigby, Governor Pownall, and others. 
 
 We are indebted to Mr. Almon, and to his close follower, the Rev. 
 Francis Thackeray, for interesting information respecting the illus- 
 trious subject of this sketch. Mr. Almon was more a man of the fash- 
 ionable world, than Mr. Henry S. WoodfalL He was distinguished for 
 his gentlemanly manners and agreeable colloquial powers, which gave 
 him access to men of the highest rank and literary eminence.
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM, CONTINUED. 
 
 When George the Third came to the crown, there were 
 high expectations, and the most pleasing predictions, from his 
 being a virtuous young man and a native king. Every thing 
 was construed in his favor. His affability, contrasted with the 
 stiff formality of his German grandfather, seemed to confirm 
 this notion.* 
 
 Having no rakish seeds to germinate within him, he passed 
 the most dangerous period of youth with his dear mother 
 chiefly in the nursery. This subtle woman, finding she could 
 not make her son a Solomon, resolved on making him another 
 
 * Notwithstanding these flattering presages at the coronation, the 
 superstitious portion of the English people had their forebodings. 
 They remarked, that he was not born in a palace, but in a private man- 
 sion (Norfolk-house); that he was a seven-months child, which is con- 
 sidered by some above the vulgar as an indication of imperfection. 
 Whether his private history tends to strengthen this notion, we live 
 too far off to decide. His own mother told Lord Melcombe, that 
 George was a dull and timid boy without any apparent partiality for 
 any one. The Earl of Waldegrave, who was his governor, says of him, 
 that " he has a kind of unhappiness in his temper which, if not con- 
 querered before it has taken deep root, will be a source of frequent 
 anxiety. Whenever he is displeased, his anger does not break out 
 with heat and violence ; but he becomes sullen and silent, and retires 
 to his closet, not to compose his mind by study or contemplation, but 
 merely to indulge the melancholy enjoyment of his own ill-humor." 
 The same nobleman adds, that " his mother and the nursery always 
 prevailed over his preceptors and governor."
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 151 
 
 Joseph, that so she might still govern him when king. Those 
 who surround heirs- apparent know what key to touch. The 
 halo about the young king soon thinned away. The honey- 
 moon of accession had its natural wane, and it was not long 
 before England became filled with apprehensions and dis- 
 contents arising from a secret influence behind the throne. 
 Straws and feathers show which way the wind blows. It was 
 not deemed polite and proper to speak in terms of respect or 
 regret of the late king ; but to whisper reproaches for his at- 
 tachment and partiality to his electoral dominions and regard 
 for the whigs, to which noble phalanx they gave the invidious 
 name of republicans. 
 
 Pitt, the favorite of the people and pride of the nation, was 
 assailed in the most abusive style by hireling writers, chiefly 
 Scotchmen. Frequently their railings were more like savage 
 rage than the effusions of literary men, and in every instance 
 their invectives far surpassed the alleged cause. The voice 
 of these political drudges was strained to the highest pitch, in 
 order to convert the glory of Pitt's victories, under George the 
 Second, into crimes. Had the age, the region, or custom al- 
 lowed it, a poisoned draught, the stiletto, a Tarpeian rock, or 
 the old Tudor axe, would have terminated the glorious career 
 of the greatest and most disinterested prime minister the world 
 had, perhaps, ever seen. 
 
 Only two days after the accession of the native king, the 
 Caledonian Earl of Bute was added to the privy council. The 
 name of his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland was struck 
 out of the liturgy, or formulary of public prayers, of the estab- 
 lished church. Some thought that the unnecessary severity 
 inflicted by the Duke on the defeated Scotch, after his victory 
 at Culloden in the year 1745, was one cause of this affront.* 
 
 But the foul torrent of abuse poured upon Lord Chatham 
 and his most distinguished friends, was so violent and unprece- 
 dented as to produce counter-streams, which uniting formed a 
 
 to UB 
 
 It might possibly have been a church and state etiquette unknown
 
 152 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 cataract that ultimately affected the repose of the throne, and 
 actually divided one half of the empire from the other. Of 
 these counter-streams the famous North Briton was the most 
 distinguished for its force and foulness. It was chiefly against 
 Lord Bute and the Princess Dowager of Wales. Nor was the 
 young monarch himself entirely spared, who, every one sup- 
 posed, might and ought to have checked and discouraged dis- 
 respectful expressions concerning the late king, his grandfather. 
 
 Mr. Wilkes was considered the principal writer in the North 
 Briton, in which periodical work the Scotch nation was held 
 up to derision by the most provoking satire. The character 
 of Wilkes was not adorned with every moral virtue, nor with 
 very extraordinary talents as a writer or speaker. He pos- 
 sessed, however, the stubbornness and perseverance of the 
 English character to the full. Yet was he a gay, witty, profli- 
 gate, and, at times, profane-spoken man, with remarkable con- 
 vivial powers, more calculated to shine at the court of a Charles 
 the Second, than at the levees of any king of the Brunswick 
 line. The passionate, vindictive, imprudent, and indeed ille- 
 gal conduct of the crown, made John Wilkes a man of very 
 great consequence, and procured him a degree of popularity 
 and favor from some men of high rank that was astonishing. 
 The sovereign people actually stepped forth, and protected 
 him from royal vengeance. The virtuous Earl of Chatham, 
 though he denounced him severely at first, at length advo- 
 cated warmly his cause in the House of Peers ; and the fas- 
 tidious Junius coaxed and flattered him in private letters, while 
 all the powers of royalty were exerted, for years, to crush 
 this man, — an outlaw, a bankrupt, a libertine, a man not 
 worth a farthing. 
 
 The undignified contest with a private subject, the inade- 
 quate, or, as most people called it, " the infamous peace," 
 and the unwise quarrel and consequent war with these North 
 American colonies, mark strongly the natural and the kingly 
 character of George the Third. This character was not that 
 of cruelty or flagrant injustice, but an inflexible obstinacy and
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 153 
 
 ungovernable self-sufficiency, joined to a wheedling, cajoling, 
 manner, whenever he meant to carry a point with an individual 
 subject ; as in the case of the unhappy Mr. Yorke, noticed by 
 Junius. 
 
 When the three grand questions which distinguish the 
 reign of George the Third were discussed in Parliament, 
 the strenuous and decided part taken by the Earl of Chatham 
 changed the secret attacks of the ministry into open ones, for 
 his dismission from office had been projected by Lord Bute 
 from the king's first accession. The young monarch's mother 
 incessantly sounded in the ears of her son this short but em- 
 phatic maxim, " George I be King." The full meaning of 
 which was, — " Be not governed by Mr. Pitt, as was your 
 grandfather." To aid this solemn injunction, Bute formed 
 a connexion with those who were known to envy, or have a 
 political dislike of the great minister, as the versatile Duke 
 of Newcastle, and Lord Holland, who he knew had been 
 borne down and humiliated, again and again, by Pitt's all- 
 subduing oratory. 
 
 It was a darling object with the Butean or Leicester-House 
 party to emancipate the crown, as they termed it, from that 
 dependence upon the few great ivhig families, who had aided 
 and adorned the two preceding reigns, and who derived their 
 weight and consequence from the revolution of 1688, — a 
 work of their hands which put an end to the Stuart race of 
 kings, and placed the ancestors of George the Third on the 
 throne of Great Britain. 
 
 In spite of calumniating pamphlets and scandalous insinua- 
 tions, Mr. Pitt, though aware of the intrigues against him, 
 calmly maintained his station ; while the king himself never 
 failed to pay him the ostensible deference of a son to a 
 father, which, on a certain occasion, induced Lord Chatham 
 to say, that " his Majesty was the greatest courtier in his 
 court." 
 
 We have mentioned already the unanimity of the Parlia- 
 ment during Pitt's happy administration. It was in a degree 
 
 20
 
 I 54 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 wonderful. Lord Chesterfield says, in a letter to his son, 
 " The estimates for the expenses of the year 1759, are made 
 up ; 1 have seen them ; and what do you think they amount 
 
 to? No less than twelve millions three hundred thousand 
 
 pounds ; a most incredible sum, and yet already all subscribed, 
 and even more offered ! The unanimity, in the House of 
 Commons, in voting such a sum, and such forces both by sea 
 and land, is not less astonishing. This is Mr. Pitt's doings, 
 ' and is marvellous in our eyes.'' " * 
 
 In another letter, six weeks after, his Lordship says, " There 
 never was so quiet, or so silent a session of Parliament as the 
 present. Mr. Pitt declares only what he would have them do, 
 and they do it nemine contradicente (Mr. Viner only excepted), 
 but nemine quicquid dicente" 
 
 Soon after George the Third had taken that, for him- 
 self, fatal step, the dissolution of Pitt's unanimous Parliament, 
 Mr. Legge was dismissed from the chancellorship of the 
 exchequer. f This gentleman was of an ancient and noble 
 family ; born in the same year with Mr. Pitt. He first enter- 
 ed the navy, but soon left it, and became the domestic and con- 
 fidential secretary of the famous Sir Robert Walpole ; and had 
 the extraordinary good fortune to be much commended by 
 his son, Horace Walpole, who rarely praised any one. Mr. 
 Legge possessed sufficient good qualities to recommend him to 
 general and particular esteem, beside the association of his 
 name with that of Lord Chatham, during whose administra- 
 tion his talents and integrity as chancellor of the exchequer 
 were most usefully exerted in supporting the Herculean meas- 
 
 * Letter 348. 
 
 f The Exchequer is the court in England to which are brought all 
 the revenues belonging to the crown. It consists of two parts, where- 
 of one dealeth specially in the hearing and deciding of all causes ap- 
 pertaining to the king's coffers. The other is called the receipt of the 
 exchequer, which is properly employed in the receiving and paying of 
 money. It is also a court of record, wherein all causes touching the 
 revenues of the crown are handled. — Harris.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. ] 55 
 
 ures of that minister. When this able man, of inflexible honor 
 and exemplary in all the relations of domestic and public 
 life, was suddenly dismissed from office, it was pulling away 
 one of Mr. Pitt's props in the exercise of his most labo- 
 rious and complicated function as prime minister. Junius, 
 in his Letter to the King, mentions the dismissal of the 
 chancellor in terms of displeasure. To render the remark 
 more pointed, he adds, in a note, " One of the first acts in 
 the present reign was to dismiss Mr. Legge, because he had, - 
 some years before, refused to yield his interest in Hampshire 
 to a Scotchman recommended by Lord Bute." 
 
 In the same celebrated letter Junius says, to the King, — 
 " To the same early influence [viz. Bute's], we attribute it, 
 that you have descended to take a share, not only in the nar- 
 row views and interests of particular persons, but in the fatal 
 malignity of their passions. At your accession to the throne 
 the ivhole system of government was altered, not from wisdom 
 or deliberation, but because it had been adopted by your pre- 
 decessor." 
 
 What seemed to fill up the measure of disgust to running 
 over, was the appointment of Lord Barrington to succeed the 
 able and virtuous Mr. Legge. And it is remarkable, that Ju- 
 nius has emptied his vials of wrath upon this nobleman, who, 
 he declares, has the blackest heart of any man in the kingdom. 
 His indignation, and his contempt of Barrington, are worth the 
 reader's notice in this inquiry. 
 
 Lord Temple and Mr. Pitt left their advice in writing with 
 the council, respecting a prompt declaration of war against 
 Spain ; which being rejected by the king, they resigned then- 
 places. At this time, it was fashionable at the levee to shud- 
 der at the horrors of war ; and to commiserate poor Britannia, 
 bleeding at every pore, to gratify the ambition of one man ! 
 England was represented as fast ruining by her victories ; and 
 Archbishop Seeker, deceived by this court cant, imbibed great 
 hopes of directing the young king, like a confessor, through 
 the influence of his religion, and he accordingly visited
 
 1 56 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 him daily. But the Defender of the Faith stuck close 
 to his prayer-book without wandering into new superstitions, 
 so that the second man in the established national church of 
 England could only join in the then fashionable denunciation 
 of the sinful practice of war, and pray for the " scattering of 
 those that delighted in it." * 
 
 It is curious that the pious king could relish no war except 
 that against his own subjects in America, and that he highly 
 enjoyed upon every gleam of success. 
 
 In the new order of things, Henry Fox (Lord Holland), 
 Lord Chatham's old school-fellow, attached himself to Lord 
 Bute, through whose influence he attained the important sta- 
 tion of manager of the House of Commons ; an officer un- 
 known to the English constitution, and unheard of in these 
 United States, and, as far as we can learn, an excrescence 
 not belonging to the healthy body of the state, but a redun- 
 dant or morbid fungus, generated by corruption, arising from 
 errors in the first concoction, and affecting all the subsequent 
 ones. However incredible it may appear to the American 
 reader, we can assure him, that such a privy purse-holder is 
 selected by the ministry of the British kings, and that the post 
 is an object of ardent contention among men of high station. 
 It is usually given to some Secretary of State. His business 
 is to distribute among those members of the House who have 
 no ostensible places, sums of money, over and above con- 
 tracts, lottery tickets, and other douceurs, with the only con- 
 dition of — " Give us your vote." 
 
 Amidst this flagrant depravity and systematic bribery the 
 proud City of London remained pure, and free from suspicion. 
 Habitual mercantile honor pervaded her politics, the offspring 
 of that wise maxim, " Honesty is the best policy," while 
 all around her were bartering honor for gold. The Earl of 
 Chatham, both before and after he attained a seat in the House 
 of Peers, extended a marked attention to the city of London. 
 
 * Psalm 68.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 157 
 
 Since the dissolute times of Charles the Second, it had been 
 fashionable at the west end of the town, and among courtiers, 
 to laugh at the city authorities, and ridicule the annual parade 
 and gorgeous exhibition of the riches, privileges, and freedom 
 of that matchless emporium, which the celebrated Linnccus de- 
 nominated, with his characteristic, felicity, the " punctum vita, 
 in vitello orbis." Our great statesman viewed his natal city 
 in the same point of view ; at which we wonder not ; for 
 where upon this globe can we find a city capable of such a 
 demonstration of wealth, liberty, and influence, as London? 
 This metropolis was a counter-balance to the alarming encroach- 
 ments of the crown during the first twenty years of the reign of 
 George the Third. In the year 1770, the Earl of Chatham 
 said in the House of Lords, — " When I mentioned the Live- 
 ry of London, I thought I saw a sneer upon some faces ; but 
 let me tell you, my Lords, though I have the honor to sit in 
 this House as a Peer of the realm, coinciding with these honest 
 citizens in opinion, I am proud of the honor of associating my 
 name with theirs. And let me tell the noblest of you all, it 
 would be an honor to you. The Livery of London were re- 
 spectable long before the reformation. The Lord Mayor of 
 London was a Principal among the twenty-five Barons who 
 received Magna Charta from King John, and they have ever 
 since been considered to have a principal weight in all the 
 affairs of government." 
 
 The peerage conferred upon Pitt, with a pension proper to 
 support that rank, was blazoned abroad, by those very hireling 
 writers who were paid for abusing him as minister. They 
 represented him as an apostate, a deserter of the cause of the 
 people, and his pension a vile bargain for abandoning the pub- 
 lic interest. Such reiterated accusations at length made an un- 
 favorable impression on the minds of some who ought to have 
 spurned the calumny. This induced Lord Chatham to give a 
 full explanation of the reason of his conduct to the City of 
 London. Whereupon the authorities of it addressed him as 
 follows.
 
 158 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 " The City of London, as long as they have any memory, 
 cannot forget that you accepted the seals when this nation was 
 in the most deplorable circumstances to which any country can 
 be reduced ; — our armies were beaten, our navy inactive, 
 our trade exposed to the enemy, our credit, as if we expected 
 to become bankrupts, sunk to the lowest pitch, so that there was 
 nothing to be found but despondency at home, and contempt 
 abroad. 
 
 " The City must also for ever remember, that when you re- 
 signed the seals, our armies and navies were victorious, our 
 trade secure and flourishing more than in peace ; our public 
 credit restored, and people readier to lend than ministers to 
 borrow ; that there was nothing but exultation at home, confu- 
 sion and despair among our enemies, amazement and venera- 
 tion among all neutral nations : — that the French were re- 
 duced so low as to sue for peace, which we, from humanity, 
 were willing to grant, though their haughtiness was too great, 
 and our successes too many, for any terms to be agreed 
 on. Remembering this, the City cannot but lament that you 
 have quitted the helm. But if knaves have taught fools to 
 call your resignation (when you can no longer procure the 
 same success, being prevented from pursuing the same meas- 
 ures) a desertion of the public, and to look upon you for ac- 
 cepting a reward, which can scarce bear that name, in the 
 light of a pensioner, the City of London hope they shall not be 
 ranked by you among the one or the other. They are truly 
 sensible that, though you cease to guide the helm, you have 
 not deserted the vessel, and that, pensioner as you are, your 
 inclination to promote the public good is still only to be equal- 
 led by your ability ; that you sincerely wish success to the 
 new pilot, and will be ready, not only to warn him and the 
 crew of rocks and quicksands, but to assist in bringing the ship 
 through the storm into a safe harbour." 
 
 If Lord Chatham was highly honored in his own country, 
 he was scarcely less so in this. No name upon earth was 
 more venerated in America than William Pitt, so long as
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 1 59 
 
 I can remember.* Whether when " the great Commoner " 
 was created a Peer he sunk his great name in that of Chatham, 
 is not for me to say. To us who know nothing of heraldry, 
 and who dwell in a peerless country, the title of Chatham 
 seems more appropriate to the famous Dutch admiral De Ruy- 
 ter f and his family, than to the first statesman and orator of 
 the British nation. Honors appear strangely conferred and 
 withheld in England. Who did most service to the realm, and 
 honor to the nation, John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, or 
 William Pitt, Earl of Chatham^ For the first, the nation 
 built a superb and very costly palace. To the latter was given 
 an inferior title, and a pension smaller than that bestowed on 
 Sir Robert Walpole. However Chatham's great mind may 
 have succeeded in restraining the expression of his disgust, it 
 must have been grating to his fiery temper to see the very 
 best fruits of the conquests achieved under his direction, given 
 back to France and to Spain, J for money to pamper indi- 
 viduals. § 
 
 If the world have execrated the wretch who, to eternize his 
 name, burnt a most gorgeous temple of antiquity, what should 
 Englishmen say of him who should prostrate their temple of 
 fame and honor ? Who could have felt this so keenly as the 
 prime architect of it himself, the Earl of Chatham ? 
 
 The Earl of Chesterfield, who, without loving Mr. Pitt, 
 greatly admired him, says to his son, that, "on his becoming 
 Earl cf Chatham, he had a fall up stairs, and has done himself 
 
 * Sixty years ago, the most frequent signs at the inns and taverns in 
 New England were Mr. Pitt — and the King of Prussia. 
 
 f In 1667 Admiral de Ruyter sailed up the river Medway and burnt 
 Chatham, at that time the principal station of the Royal navy, and 
 within 30 miles of London, together with several of their first-rate and 
 other men of war, and returned in triumph to Amsterdam, where is a 
 superb marble monument erected to his honor. 
 
 J As the island of Cuba ; a future Atlantic kingdom in itself. 
 
 § See the examination of Dr. Musgrave before the House of Com- 
 mons, recorded in a note to the XXII. Chapter of " Ahnon's Anec- 
 dotes and Speeches of Lord Chatham."
 
 I GO CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 so much hurt that he will never be able to stand upon his legs 
 again. Every body is puzzled how to account for this step ; 
 though it would not be the first time that great abilities have 
 b.een duped by cunning. But be it what it will, he is now only 
 Earl of Chatham, and no longer Mr. Pitt, in any respect what- 
 ever. To withdraw, in the fullness of his power and in the 
 utmost gratification of his ambition, from the House of Com- 
 mons, which procured him his power, and which could alone 
 ensure it to him, and to go into that hospital of incurables, 
 the House of Lords, is a measure so unaccountable, that noth- 
 ing but proof positive could have made me believe it. There 
 is one bad sign for Lord Chatham, in his new dignity, which 
 is, that all his enemies, without exception, rejoice at it ; and 
 all his friends are stupefied and dumfounded." This is not the 
 first time, the public has seen that Lord Chesterfield erred 
 in judgment. He had no scales or standard by which to de- 
 termine the sterling value of Lord Chatham. 
 
 During the years 1766 and 1767, Lord Chatham suffered 
 grievously from erratic gout, with its usual concomitant, dejec- 
 tion of spirits. He resorted to Bath, where was Lord Ches- 
 terfield with the same disorder, who writes to his son, Philip 
 Stanhope, that " Mr. Pitt keeps his bed here with a very real 
 gout, and not a political one, as is often suspected." More than 
 a year after, December 19, 1767, he writes again from the 
 
 same place. " Lord Chatham's physician, Dr. , had very 
 
 ignorantly checked a coming fit of the gout, and scattered it 
 about his body, and it fell particularly on his nerves, so that he 
 continues exceedingly vaporish. He would neither see nor 
 speak to any body while he was here. This time twelve- 
 month, he was here in good health and spirits ; but for 
 these last eight months he has been absolutely invisible to 
 his most intimate friends ; he would receive no letters, nor 
 so much as open any packet about business." In another 
 letter, January 29, 1768, Chesteifield says, "Lord Chat- 
 ham is at his re-purchased house at Hayes, but sees no 
 mortal. Some say he has a fit of the gout, which would
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 161 
 
 probably do him good ; but many think that his worst com- 
 plaint is in his head, which I am afraid is too true." 
 
 When Lord Chatham resorted for the the last time to Bath, 
 he was indeed a sick man. His constitution appeared to be 
 giving way to a depression of spirits and a corresponding weak- 
 ness of mind. His whole system seemed so concussated, 
 that his physicians at Bath declared their despair of his life. 
 "Whenever a very great man in high station happens to be af- 
 flicted with those symptoms that naturally belong to three- 
 score years of age, his enemies, at once, attribute them to a 
 troubled mind operating upon the body, and not, as in nine 
 instances in ten, to the body operating on the mind. The 
 concussion of an originally strong constitution, early shattered 
 by hereditary gout, was exultingly attributed by his Lordship's 
 foes to chagrin and mortification, at seeing the political world 
 going on without him, when in fact it was the natural effect 
 of a cruel chronic disease, making its attack in the narrowest 
 and most dangerous defile of adult life. 
 
 The source or head-quarters of the gout is in the centre of 
 our bodies, chiefly in the prime organ of digestion, and mani- 
 fests itself by what the old school of medicine denominated, 
 happily enough, an error or defect in the first concoction, pro- 
 ducing derangement in all the other functions, even to that of 
 intellect. During the alteration in our bodies by the course of 
 time and the changing events of life, the vires medicatrices 
 natures exercise their powers from this centre, — this focus, 
 hearth, or fire-place of our tabernacle ; hence the ebbing 
 and flowing of the tide of spirits in most gouty subjects ; 
 hence the fiery rage of the poet and the orator; hence the 
 deep, atrabilarious gloom of the hypochondriac. Lord Chat- 
 ham's physicians did not sufficiently consider, that the noble 
 sufferer had arrived at that ticklish period of man's life, that 
 critical round in the ladder of our mortal progression, which 
 many never get over, and few pass without a violent struggle. 
 This is not an astrological whim, sprouting out of the Pytha- 
 gorean doctrine of the mystical number seven misunderstood, 
 
 21
 
 162 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 but grounded in nature and confirmed by close observation. 
 It arrested the attention of Plato, of Cicero, and Aulus Gel- 
 lius, and several of the Grecian writers on medicine. It is a 
 change in the male system without destroying man's identity, 
 and commonly occurs about every seventh year ; sometimes 
 short of it, sometimes beyond it. 
 
 It is between the twenty-ninth and the thirty-sixth year, that 
 the vigor of the body and the powers of the mind generally 
 unite to render man capable of the greatest exertion of both. 
 
 At the age of forty-two there is generally a visible alteration. 
 The veins on the back of the hands appear larger and fuller. 
 Apoplexies very rarely occur before this period, and bleeding 
 at the nose and from the lungs seldom after it. 
 
 In his fiftieth year, a man discovers some waning in his 
 memory. Still this period is dignified by gravity and thought- 
 fulness. Between this period and the next, sedentary men 
 very often experience a loss of appetite, disturbed sleep, and 
 a diminution of their usual cheerfulness, and have a sallow as- 
 pect, or an ash-colored visage, accompanied with inactivity, 
 a lack of resolution, and apprehensions of evil from slight 
 causes. The sailor, the soldier, and the hard-working me- 
 chanic now know the luxury of a seat. If there be no chronic 
 inflammation, no swelling of the legs, shortness of breath, or 
 signs of organic lesion in any of those viscera destined to carry 
 on the unconscious operations of the animal economy, the sub- 
 ject recovers from this serious spell of moulting, which has 
 given rise to the popular expression, that such a one has 
 " taken a new lease of his life," seeing he has increased in 
 flesh and firmness. 
 
 Then comes the age of Sixty-Three, long celebrated as the 
 grand climacteric, being noted by Hippocrates and by Aris- 
 totle. Suetonius tells us, that he congratulated his nephew on 
 his passing one of these stages in safety. Looking beyond the- 
 ories and written authorities, let us try to construe some pas- 
 sages in the Book of Nature on a subject that comes home to 
 the bosoms of us all. At this important period of our lives,
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 163 
 
 the man heretofore plump appears to shrink ; his eyes are suf- 
 fused with tears, but from no emotion of the mind ; every visible 
 part becomes less, lean, and extenuated. It is doubtless the 
 same with parts and organs concealed from sight. The voice 
 becomes smaller, the hair loses its color, firmness,, and elas- 
 ticity, first on the temples, called by the Romans tempora, or 
 the footmarks of Time. As the shrinkage, dryness, and lean- 
 ness prevail, wrinkles multiply, and the lower limbs lose their 
 wonted stability. 
 
 We have reason for believing, that similar changes take 
 place in other animals. We notice those only which we have 
 domesticated, especially that tribe of birds, which, being with- 
 out a specific name in our language, are therefore called foiols, 
 or cocks and hens. These are well known to undergo a change 
 in three hundred and, sixty days, resembling that to which we 
 have alluded in the human species. During this crisis, the noble 
 game-cock loses his courage and fierceness, and the more weak- 
 ly ones sometimes die in the struggle. No feeding can maintain 
 the vigor of the first, nor care preserve the latter from drooping. 
 The female as well as the male bird is disordered and unsociable. 
 Poulterers give these anonymous birds aromatic articles and 
 spices to help them by a due stimulus to go speedily through 
 this renovating process. The woodcock tribe lose so entirely 
 their peculiar effluvium, that the dogs cannot smell and hunt 
 them out. These birds appear to cast off their old feathers 
 with pain and fever ; after which their feathers acquire fresh 
 brilliancy and beauty, their sociability increases, accompa- 
 nied with a florid turgescence of their combs and gills, and 
 the whole flock seem teeming with life, and with a disposition 
 to perpetuate it. 
 
 All these things, being taken into consideration, will lead us 
 to recognise and admire a law of nature to which all must 
 submit, from the brightest of the human kind to the humble 
 animal we destroy for food. 
 
 The melancholy condition of the illustrious subject of this 
 imperfect sketch arose most probably from corporeal causes,
 
 1G4 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 depending on the living fibre and the living fluids, which, when 
 diseased, operate on the mind and on the body, or both at once, 
 and this, to a certain extent, is death. What could be expected 
 from a being long tortured with pain, and manacled by infirmi- 
 ty, with a mind in consequence of it depressed below its natu- 
 ral greatness and self-command ? 
 
 In the gloomy month of February, 1767, Lord Chatham at- 
 tempted to return from Bath to London, but was compelled to 
 stop at Marlborough, where he was confined a month ; and then 
 came on to Hampstead,* but in a very enfeebled state, where 
 he resided some time. While there, the King sent almost 
 every day to inquire after his health, in soothing terms of es- 
 teem, respect, and consolation. 
 
 Very few public men pass through life without a dark cloud 
 hanging over some part of it. The heretofore strong and clear 
 mind of the Earl of Chatham now appeared weakened and 
 perplexed, from physical causes already touched upon. The 
 mighty statesman, who astonished and awed Europe, and sub- 
 dued France and Spain, now bent under the weight of years 
 and disorder. His popularity was diminished by his accep- 
 tance of the peerage, and his constitutional malady unfitted him 
 for business. The national affairs appeared to be again in as 
 gnarled a state as when he was called to the helm by George 
 the Second, in the year 1757. Lord Chesterfield speaks thus 
 of them to his son.f " Eight or nine people of some conse- 
 quence have resigned their employments ; upon which Lord 
 Chatham made overtures to the Duke of Bedford and his 
 people, but they could by no means agree, and his Grace went 
 the next day, full of wrath, to Woburn, J so that negotiation is 
 entirely at an end. People wait to see whom Lord Chatham will 
 take in ; for some he must have ; even he cannot be alone 
 contra mundum. They propagated a report, for a short time 
 believed, that the Earl of Chatham had joined the Earl of 
 
 * A pleasant village in the vicinity of London. 
 
 t Letter 372. 
 
 X The Duke's country residence.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 105 
 
 Bute." At this time our great statesman's temper was evident- 
 ly soured. He was constitutionally irritable, quick, and im- 
 petuous. Long habit of dictation in rapid business, great su- 
 periority in debate and of mind, gave an air of austerity, if not 
 hauteur, to his manners, and precluded the policy of a con- 
 venient condescension to the minutiae of politeness, of which he 
 was a complete master whenever he chose. This inattention 
 to the small things of the philosopher, and the great things of 
 Lord Chesterfield, occasionally chafed the feelings of some of 
 his most valuable friends, and produced a temporary coolness 
 between him and Lord Temple. The excitability of a poda- 
 gric is proverbial ; and when vexation and disappointments, im- 
 paired friendship and resentment, added to the physical causes 
 already mentioned, preyed upon the nerves of Lord Chatham, 
 we wonder that he ever recovered ; yet after all, he sur- 
 mounted the struggle, and came out, like the king of birds, 
 after moulting, with renewed beauty and increased vigor, and 
 demonstrated his complete restoration in the House of Lords, 
 by transcending all his former eloquence on one of the most 
 important subjects ever agitated in the British Senate. f 
 
 f The American question.
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM, CONTINUED. 
 
 Previously to Lord Chatham's resorting to Bath, he had a 
 conference in the royal closet, at the request of the sovereign, 
 respecting a new ministry. The result was a precipitate for- 
 mation of one, rendered famous by Mr. Burke's description of 
 it, as a piece of diversified Mosaic — a mere tessellated pave- 
 ment without cement ; here a bit of black stone, and there a bit 
 of white ; patriots and courtiers ; " king's friends " and republi- 
 cans ; whigs and tories ; treacherous friends and open ene- 
 mies. 
 
 While Lord Chatham was sick at Bath, and his recovery 
 despaired of, the administration was without a leader. The 
 right honorable Charles Toivnshend assumed, in some degree, 
 the reins of government ; and he, in conjunction with General 
 Conway, meditated some alliances, with a view to establishing 
 the power of the former. In a word, Mr. Townshend, a gen- 
 tleman of brilliant talents and lofty views, resolved to seize this 
 opportunity to fill the place, which it was thought death would
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 167 
 
 soon make. He therefore instantly joined the court, with the 
 most full and explicit declaration of sincerity, and his alliance 
 was favorably received. But, reader ! mark the end of these 
 things, and learn another lesson of wisdom ! Charles Town- 
 shend died after a short illness, and Lord Chatham recovered ! 
 
 Lord Charlemont, in a letter to Mr. Flood, dated London, 
 February the 19th, 1767, says, " Lord Chatham is daily ex- 
 pected, and till he arrives nothing worth informing you of is likely 
 to happen." In another of April the 9th, 1767, that nobleman 
 says, — " Lord Chatham is still minister, but how long he may 
 continue so is a problem that would pose the deepest politician. 
 The opposition grows more and more violent, and seems to 
 gain ground ; his ill health as yet prevents his doing any busi- 
 ness. The ministry is divided into as many parties as there 
 are men in it; all complain of his want of participation. 
 Charles Townshend is at open war ; Conway is angry ; Lord 
 Shelburne out of humor, and the Duke of Grafton by no means 
 pleased." So much for Burke's tessellated pavement; a meta- 
 phor borrowed from Lord Chesterfield. 
 
 The high blown hopes of Mr. Townshend and his friends 
 were blasted by his death, while Lord Chatham lay sick at 
 Hampstead. Had he lived, he would very probably have been 
 First Lord of the Treasury, and Mr. Yorke * his Chancellor. 
 
 We left Lord Chatham very sick at Hampstead. The king 
 sent almost every day to inquire after his health, desiring him 
 not to be concerned at his confinement, or absence from pub- 
 lic business, for that he was resolved to support him. 
 
 In consequence of the apprehension of resignations, his Maj- 
 esty, a few days after the rising of Parliament, wrote a letter ivlth 
 his own hand to Lord Chatham, then confined to his bed, ac- 
 quainting him with his resolution to make alterations in his 
 ministry, and desiring his Lordship's advice and assistance. 
 To which mark of respect and condescension, Chatham re- 
 turned a verbal answer " that such was his ill state of health, 
 
 * This gentleman destroyed himself. See Junius.
 
 1G8 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 that his Majesty must not expect from him any farther advice 
 or assistance in any arrangement whatever." 
 
 On which the reverend Francis Thackeray remarks, that it 
 is scarcely to be conceived, that the same ardent and high- 
 spirited minister, who formerly retired from office because he 
 was not allowed to guide the measures of the country, should 
 have sent such an answer to his sovereign, without accompany- 
 ing it by the resignation of his seal. But this reverend gen- 
 tleman should, as an historian, have considered the well 
 known impression on the mind of Lord Chatham respecting 
 the King's sincerity ; and as a minister of religion he should 
 have known, from his parochial duties, that the bed of sick- 
 ness, and, in this case, apparent death, was neither the place 
 nor the time for compliments, or the multiplication of words. 
 While a clerical historian holds up, to his listening flock, Death 
 as the King of Terrors ! he should praise God in their 
 hearing, that he is also the terror of kings ! with whom there 
 is no trifling ! 
 
 The Earl of Chatham, so much superior to other men, was 
 
 not exempted from the frailties of us all. He had arrived at 
 
 that commonly trying period of man's existence, considered, 
 
 from the earliest records of medicine, climacterical, when he 
 
 is most liable to stumble down the hill of life, — a hazardous 
 
 epoch, when an hereditary or constitutional disorder meets less 
 
 resistance from those repelling powers of nature implanted 
 
 within us to ward off premature destruction. Lord Chatham 
 
 had " originally a healthy, sanguine constitution" But who 
 
 can reason down his shattered nerves to quietude ? or argue 
 
 coolly and justly with his nervous symptoms ? or, to express 
 
 the same idea in better words, 
 
 " Who can hold a fire in his hand 
 By thinking on the frosty Caucasus ? 
 Or wallow naked in December's snow 
 By thinking on fantastic summer's heat ? " * 
 
 * Shakspeare.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 1G9 
 
 The Earl of Chatham met that odious visitant to pre-eminent 
 distinction in its wane of power, " the marble-hearted fiend, In- 
 gratitude." Lord Charlemont says, in a letter to Mr. Flood in 
 Ireland, dated in February, 17G7, " There has been, upon va- 
 rious topics, a great deal of conversation in the House of Com- 
 mons, but no divisions. One thing, however, appears very ex- 
 traordinary, if not indecent ; no member of the opposition 
 speaks without directly abusing Lord Chatham, and no friend 
 ever rises to take his part. Qui non defendit alio culpante 
 is scarce a degree less black than absentem qui rodit amiciim. 
 Is it possible that such a man can be friendless ? " 
 
 As to the period of which we have been speaking, political 
 writers of all parties agree, that there never was a time, in the 
 reign of any of the Georges, when discontents were more gene- 
 rally prevalent, or when the people were more wakened to 
 them. The causes have been explained in a masterly manner 
 by Mr. Burke. 
 
 Lord Chatham's disordered body and distempered mind 
 needed tranquillity to recruit both. In the podagric, the total 
 absence of arthritic pains diminishes the vigor of the mind. 
 What is that in the gouty man which counteracts sluggishness 
 of intellect, and wages war with stupidity ? It resembles the 
 hectic of genius in all its high pulsations of poetry and elo- 
 quence. It would seem that the great minister was all placidi- 
 ty with his domestic connexions, and towards his sovereign all 
 deference and respect, whatever he was toward those with 
 whom he had official business. He sought repose in the 
 bosom of his beloved family in his re-purchased family resi- 
 dence at Hayes ; and this calm retreat in a favorite spot had 
 the happiest effects in restoring his mind, at least, to its 
 pristine vigor. But can any one believe, that the capacious 
 and elastic mind of Lord Chatham was as acquiescent as his 
 body during this retirement; that he would allow "the sen- 
 sible, warm emotion to become there a kneaded clod ? " 
 The idea is incredible ! Within three months from this time, 
 
 22
 
 170 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 he returned the privy-seal to the king by the hand of his 
 friend, Lord Camden. 
 
 Behold then JUNIUS Brutus in retirement, brooding over 
 the disgraces of his country and his own personal wrongs, 
 meditating her deliverance, and fostering his own feelings of 
 revenge, — always strong, but now rendered acrimonious by 
 age and disease. It was at this awful period of public discon- 
 tent and keen personal feelings, that Junius burst upon the 
 British public with the suddenness and violence of an Ameri- 
 can thundergust ! * 
 
 As Lord Chatham had not the meekness of Moses, nor the 
 coolness of Washington, we may imagine what were the feel- 
 ings of the offended minister. A man strong-willed, self-suf- 
 ficient, and powerfully gifted, naturally imperious, and morbidly 
 impatient, in the decline of life, racked with incurable gout, and 
 living a life of decrepitude and self-denial, without one cheering 
 prospect in his political horizon, must close his lips in everlasting 
 silence, or if he speak at all, must " speak daggers." Under 
 these circumstances, reflect a moment on his incessant labors, 
 great occasional exertions, and eminent hazards ; the plans of 
 conquest he formed, and the victories achieved in consequence 
 of them ; the best fruits of which were given back to France and 
 to Spain for money — yes, for money to pamper the pride and 
 passions of the King's and Lord Bute's friends, for the nation 
 had none of it.f Consider also the native king, with good in- 
 tentions, hurried on to error by an intriguing German mother, 
 inculcating obstinacy under the guise of firmness, while a sor- 
 did Scotchman was littering his head with trifles, and stimu- 
 lating him to exert all his constitutional powers, and some- 
 what more, to crush a private individual, the abetted champion 
 of the people's rights. J 
 
 * January 29, 17G9. 
 
 f See the examination of Dr. Musgrave before the House of Com- 
 mons. 
 
 \ John Wilkes.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 171 
 
 Perhaps no man could have felt all these mortifying circum- 
 stances so keenly as he who had directed the successful war 
 against the House of Bourbon, conquering the French islands 
 in the West Indies, and all their possessions in the East, and 
 dispossessing them entirely of the vast region under the name 
 of Canada. The honor and glory of old England lay so near 
 Lord Chatham's heart, that they constituted his ruling passion. 
 Next to that in his affections were these North American colo- 
 nies. Take likewise into view the dark and rolling clouds 
 rapidly approaching from this country, after George Gren- 
 ville became minister, threatening a dreadful storm ; and we 
 shall be convinced, that such a temperament as Chatham's 
 could not possibly sink, at once, into a state of apathy to the 
 manifold dangers and disgraces of the nation. This would be 
 to suppose with the sordid vulgar, that Pitt's patriotic spirit 
 evaporated when be became a peer. 
 
 The condition of this retired statesman was, in a degree, de- 
 plorable. Disease forbade him the benefit of travelling, pro- 
 hibited hunting, and the easier gesture of ordinary horse-back 
 exercise ; and, what marks his bodily decrepitude still stronger, 
 he was unable to perform on any musical instrument, so cru- 
 elly had the gout fed on his extremities. How could such an 
 active mind of ethereal fire fill up the hours ? What, think ye, 
 were the horcc politico, of such an experienced personage ? 
 Thought, keen thought, and alternately painful and gratifying 
 reminiscences j for none could suppose, that the virtuous Earl 
 of Chatham could, like too many disgusted men, " steep his 
 senses in forgetfulness." 
 
 If we consider human nature in its brightest point of view, — 
 genius disciplined by careful education, as that of Lord Chat- 
 ham's, we cannot suppose that, after he withdrew from the tur- 
 moils of a complicated office encumbered with deep responsi- 
 bility, he could have sunk, all at once, to indolence. He had 
 raised his country, in the short space of three years, from de- 
 pression and disgrace to exaltation and glory, and that by force 
 of his superior genius and spotless moral character. His plans
 
 172 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 were the wisest, his instrurhenls the best, and his success the 
 completest of any prime minister's on the annals of fame. Can 
 it be believed, that a statesman thus endowed, and with trans- 
 cendent eloquence, should have left behind him no other pro- 
 ductions of his pen than a few very tame, if not lean, letters to 
 his son and his nephew, compositions which many a mother in 
 old England and New could have equalled ? To such a mir- 
 ror of eloquence " vita sine Uteris mors est." It is no way 
 probable, that the ardent mind became suddenly cold, that the 
 strong and burning wave of political zeal stopped at once. 
 These sudden stagnations occur, only from an instantaneous 
 stroke, impairing at once the mainspring of the intellectual or- 
 gan ; whereas Chatham, it is well known, blazed forth in Par- 
 liament, two or three years after, stronger and brighter than 
 ever. Nay, in 1770, he denounced the conduct of the cabi- 
 net in such a bitter and overwhelming torrent of eloquence, as 
 induced several in the ministry to resign their offices, and 
 sadly distressed the monarch himself. It was when the king 
 passionately dismissed the Lord Chancellor Camden, the in- 
 timate friend of Lord Chatham. This was a period of confu- 
 sion and distress at court, from occurrences which rendered the 
 primary object of it a subject of commiseration and tears. It 
 was when difficulties, perplexities, and embarrassments led the 
 monarch to send for the Hon. Mr. Yorke, to whom were 
 offered the great seals. By long and very earnest entreaties, 
 which at length overpowered his reluctance, he was compelled 
 in a manner to accept them. The infliction of this high honor 
 compelled the unhappy man, soon after, to put an end to his 
 mortal existence.* — Who can wonder, that " uneasy is the 
 head that wears a crown ? " 
 
 Few people in this country are aware of the deep impres- 
 sion made upon the minds of people of the first rank by the 
 
 * Junius, alluding to the violent death of Mr. Yorke, says, " The 
 most secret particulars of this detestable transaction shall, in due time, 
 be given to the public. The people shall know what kind of man they 
 have to deal with." Is that due time not yet arrived ?
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 17,3 
 
 Letters in question. Hear what the eminent English moralist, 
 the very able, rough, and scragged Samuel Johnson says of 
 the author of them. " Junius burst into notice with a blaze 
 of impudence which has rarely glared upon the world before', 
 and drew the rabble after him, as a monster makes a show." 
 This is unjust, untrue, and abusive. It was not the rabble, 
 but the deep-thinking aristocracy, both whigs and tories, who 
 were moved the most by the voice of Junius. Dr. Johnson 
 adds, — " He is an unusual phenomenon, on which some have 
 gazed with wonder and some with terror, but wonder and ter- 
 ror are transitory passions. He soon will be more closely 
 viewed, or more attentively examined ; and what folly has 
 taken for a comet, that, ' from its flaming hair, shook pestilence 
 and war,' inquiry will find to be only a meteor, formed by the 
 vapors of putrefying democracy, and kindled into flame by 
 the effervescence of interest struggling with conviction, which, 
 after having plunged its followers in a bog, will leave us in- 
 quiring why we regarded it." What labor, — what painful 
 straining to evacuate a hard, mephitic paragraph ! Compare 
 it with the ease, elegance, dignity, and precision of most of the 
 pages of the writer he reviles. The Rambler, in pursuing his 
 figure, lost his chemistry, and forgot that effervescence and pu- 
 trefaction are steps to regeneration. The literary giant adds, — 
 " Junius has sometimes made his satire felt ; but let not in- 
 judicious admiration mistake the venom of the shaft for the 
 vigor of the bow. He has sometimes sported with lucky 
 malice ; but to him who knows his company, it is not hard 
 to be sarcastic in a mask. While he walks, like Jack the 
 giant-killer, in a coat of darkness, he may do much mischief 
 with little strength." All this appears like a day-laboring 
 man working for wages. The same renowned critic proceeds 
 thus, — " Finding sedition ascendant, he has been able to ad- 
 vance it ; finding the nation combustible, he has been able to 
 in (lame it. Let us abstract from his wit the vivacity of inso- 
 lence, and withdraw from his efficacy the sympathetic favor of 
 plebeian malignity ; — I do not say that we shall leave him noth-
 
 174 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ing ; the cause that I defend scorns the help of falsehood ; but 
 if we leave him only his merit, what will be his praise ? " 
 That is in substance to say,— Kill the lion, and give his flesh 
 to the dogs, — break all his bones, and pick out their marrow, 
 and what will you leave of the monarch of the woods but his 
 matchless skin ? 
 
 Mr. Burke, who never sold his brilliant talents, and who, 
 Johnson thought, was the only man capable of writing the Let- 
 ters in question, took a different and more honorable view of 
 Junius. He speaks with astonishment of his hardihood, and 
 admiration of his talents, knowledge, and integrity. That Ju- 
 nius, in a visor and complete armor of polished steel, was a 
 terrific object, appears from other evidence than that of Burke, 
 and the affected contempt of Johnson. Kings, Lords, and Com- 
 mons, the army, the literary aristocracy of Britain, the au- 
 tocracy of the people, — all, all felt the power of a free press, 
 when wielded by the hand of this very able and fearless cham- 
 pion of liberty. Instead of the transitory effect of the princi- 
 ples of Junius, predicted by Dr. Johnson, they are still felt. 
 Their deep impression yet remains in Great Britain. Nor is 
 this all. The same spirit even now walks these shores of the 
 Atlantic, " magni nominis umbra." Nay, more. France is 
 wide awake, where 
 
 " Millions of souls 
 Shall feel its power, 
 And bear it down 
 To millions more."
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM, CONTINUED. 
 
 Great Britain, at peace with all the world, her own sub- 
 jects excepted, was, between the years 1767 and 1770, sadly 
 perturbed by Wilkes and Liberty. Behind the stalking-horse 
 of the Middlesex election marched the formidable corps of 
 ousted and resentful whigs. To this respectable English force 
 was opposed a Scotch one, commanded by the Earl of Bute, 
 assisted by Lord Mansfield. This army of raw troops was 
 rendered in a degree formidable, by having, as in the civil 
 war with Charles the First, a royal generalissimo at its head. 
 What it lacked in experience, discipline, and steady Roman 
 valor, was made up by the magical circumstance of royal in- 
 fluence. In the first army John Wilkes was a daring and 
 very successful partisan officer ; while in the latter, Mansfield 
 was at the head of the sappers and miners. 
 
 The first Parliament, in the reign of George the Third, was 
 dissolved in March, 17G8. Of this Parliament it is observed 
 by a sensible and candid historian,* that it exhibited no dis- 
 tinguishing marks of legislative wisdom ; that its chief objects 
 were individual prosecution and colonial regulations ; in which 
 its members proceeded with the passion of partisans, and not 
 the cool policy of senators ; and towards these colonies with a 
 succession of contradictory measures. " They irritated," says 
 the historian, " conciliated, and irritated again, and left the 
 
 * Dr. Bisset's History of George Hi.
 
 176 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 colonies ill affected towards this country, sowing the seeds of 
 the American war." The Commons, raised, according to 
 their own writers, from a hot-bed of corruption, seemed busily 
 employed in sawing off the limb of the tree which bore them, 
 or, in plainer terms, voting away their own privileges to gratify 
 the ministry. 
 
 Lord Chatham, deeply imbued with constitutional principles 
 and the purest patriotic spirit, advocated the cause of John 
 Wilkes ; he viewed him merely as an Englishman possessing 
 certain rights, without any regard to his merits or demerits as 
 a man. In this point of view only, the question was contem- 
 plated by Lord Chatham, and precisely so considered by Ju- 
 nius ; while the new-fangled Parliament talked nonsense about 
 reformation, when their only rule of conduct was to act in di- 
 rect opposition to the harmonious one which terminated with 
 the power of Pitt. While the popular party adored Wilkes, 
 worshipping they knew not what, the partisans of the court 
 spoke of him as the vilest incendiary. " For my own part," 
 says Lord Chatham, " I am neither moved by his private vices, 
 nor by his public merits. In his person, though he were the 
 worst of men, I contend for the safety and security of the best." 
 It is presumed that the reader bears in mind, that the resent- 
 ment of the people arose from the House of Commons expel- 
 ling Mr. Wilkes after his repeated election by the county of 
 Middlesex, which deprived its electors of the free choice of a 
 representative. On this occasion Lord Chatham said in the 
 House of Peers, " I have considered the matter with most se- 
 rious attention ; and as I have not in my own breast the small- 
 est doubt, that the present universal discontent of the nation 
 arises from the expulsion of Mr. Wilkes, I think that we ought, 
 in our address [then under debate], to state the matter to the 
 king." But his motion for it was negatived. 
 
 On the 22d of January, 1770, the Marquis of Rockingham 
 moved for fixing a day to take into consideration the state of 
 the nation.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 177 
 
 The object of his speech was to show, " that the present un- 
 happy condition of affairs and the universal discontent of the 
 people did not arise from any immediate temporary cause, but 
 had grown up by degrees, from the moment of his majesty's ac- 
 cession to the throne ; that the person, in whom his majesty 
 then confided, had introduced a total change in the old system 
 of English government ; that they had adopted a maxim which 
 must prove fatal to the liberties of the country, viz. ' that the 
 royal prerogative alone was sufficient to support government, 
 to whatever hands the administration should be committed ' ; 
 and he could trace the operation of this principle through every 
 act of government since the accession, in which those persons 
 could be supposed to have any influence. Their first exertion 
 of the prerogative was to make a peace contrary to the wishes 
 of the nation, and on terms totally disproportioned to the suc- 
 cess of the war ; but as they felt themselves unequal to the 
 conduct of a war, they thought a peace, on any conditions, 
 necessary for their own security and permanence in adminis- 
 tration. The Marquis then took notice of those odious, tyran- 
 nical acts of power, by which an approbation of the peace had 
 been obtained. And he mentioned the general siveep from 
 office through every branch and department of administration ; 
 the removes not merely confined to the higher employments, 
 but carried down, with the minutest cruelty, to the lowest of- 
 fices of the state ; and numberless innocent families, which had 
 subsisted on salaries from fifty to two hundred pounds a year, 
 turned out to misery and ruin, with as little regard to the rules 
 of justice as to the common feelings of compassion." * 
 
 *Here we may remark, that the cruel and unjust system of removals, 
 down to the lowest offices, which has heen pursued here within 
 the last two years (182'J and 1830), and has created general disgust 
 throughout the United States, has not even the merit of originality, but 
 is copied from the system introduced by the Earl of Bute, and pursued 
 by George the Third to his own destruction. That wretched policy 
 called forth the North Briton, and that audacious publication, Junius, 
 which led to measures that divided the empire ; otherwise America 
 
 23
 
 178 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 The Duke of Grafton spoke next ; and after him the Earl 
 of Chatham said, " My Lords, I need not look abroad for 
 grievances. The grand, capital mischief is fixed at home. It 
 corrupts the very foundation of our political existence, and 
 preys upon the vitals of the state. The constitution has 
 been grossly violated. The constitution at this moment 
 stands violated. Until that wound be healed, until the 
 grievance be redressed, it is in vain to promote concord among 
 the people. If we mean seriously to unite the nation within 
 itself, we must convince them, that their complaints are re- 
 garded, and that their injuries shall be redressed. On that 
 foundation, I would take the lead in recommending peace and 
 harmony to the people. On any other, I would never wish to 
 see them united again. If the breach in the constitution be 
 effectually repaired, the people will of themselves return to a 
 state of tranquillity. If not, — may discord prevail for ever. 
 I know to what point this doctrine and this language will 
 appear directed. But I feel the principles of an Englishman, 
 and I utter them without apprehension or reserve. The crisis 
 is indeed alarming ; so much the more does it require a pru- 
 dent relaxation on the part of government. If the king's ser- 
 vants will not permit a constitutional question to be decided 
 on, according to the forms and on the principles of the consti- 
 tution, it must then be decided in some other manner ; and 
 rather than it should be given up, rather than the nation should 
 surrender their birth-right to a despotic minister, I hope, my 
 Lords, old as I am, I shall see the question brought to issue 
 and fairly tried between the people and the government. My 
 Lords, this is not the language of faction ; let it be tried by 
 that criterion by which alone we can distinguish what is fac- 
 tious from what is not, — by the principles of the English con- 
 stitution. I have been bred up in these principles ; and I 
 
 might have been a century longer dependant on the realm of Great 
 Britain, and its sovereign might have lived out his days with mens 
 sana in corpore sano.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. ] 79 
 
 know, that when the liberty of the subject is invaded, and all 
 redress denied him, resistance is justified." * 
 
 This is direct, plain, forcible, and decisive language, the 
 very characteristic of Junius, with all his fearless spirit; and 
 I will add, of no other writer or orator whatever, contempo- 
 rary, anterior, or subsequent. 
 
 Lord Chatham retired, in 1768, to his favorite spot at 
 Hayes, fifteen miles from London, where he saw no visitors, 
 nor answered any letters. But when the aspect of affairs 
 became alarming, threatening personal as well as general lib- 
 erty, he left his couch of infirmity, and, repairing to Parlia- 
 ment, broke upon the delinquents with the energy and fire 
 of a divinely inspired prophet, and in language as fearless. 
 Where is there an English prose-writer who comes up to 
 Chatham in force, fire, noble daring, and dignity of expression, 
 exemplified in his speeches in the House of Lords, — Junius 
 alone excepted'? Edmund Burke, abounding in lessons of 
 civil and moral wisdom, charming with flowers and metaphors, 
 rich in illustration, captivating in his transitions, and splendid 
 in every thing, never dashes upon the soul with the ir- 
 resistible wave of Chatham's invective ; — nor does any writer, — 
 unless we except the overwhelming rage of Junius, which 
 struck breathless King, Lords, and Commons. If Burke was 
 the sublime and beautiful, Chatham was the sublime and ter- 
 rible, and so was Junius. 
 
 Lord Chatham had a singular energy of style, and his minis- 
 ters abroad at foreign courts were puzzled to clothe his ideas 
 in any other language than his own. The Hon. Hans Stan- 
 ley, who was sent to Paris in 17G1 to treat of the prelimina- 
 ries of peace, writes to Mr. Pitt thus, — " Though you are ex- 
 tremely skilled in the French language, I believe you would 
 find it difficult precisely to translate your own memorial ; and 
 that you would often be obliged to exercise your judgment 
 in the choice of phrases, — as every word carries a distinct 
 idea, which can in no other way be with equal force ex- 
 
 * Almon's Speeches of Chatham.
 
 180 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 pressed." Is not this exactly the case with the best Letters 
 of Junius ? It corresponds with the remarks we have already 
 made on his peculiar style.* 
 
 In early life Pitt's ambition panted for the tented field ; 
 but disease pressed him into a different service ; otherwise 
 he might have taken the right of Hannibal, Caesar, and Na- 
 poleon, in the laurelled rank of great commanders. An over- 
 ruling agency, that which gives the secret bias to the soul, in- 
 stead of granting him the flying war-horse, nailed him down to 
 his bureau ; whence, though crippled, he influenced powerfully 
 the minds of men, prescribed to departments, directed fleets and 
 armies, guided senates, instructed monarchs, controlled na- 
 tions, — Prussia by his friendship, and France by his hostili- 
 ty, — and caused Europe and America to acknowledge the 
 force of his mind. Could such a mind, after these political 
 and martial victories, sink down into torpidity in a country vil- 
 lage, or retreat at once into a cave, there " to lie in cold ob- 
 struction and to rot ? " It is incredible. That his soul of fire 
 was not damped, the House of Peers could testify. Is it 
 likely that such an ambitious mind would leave his fame 
 floating on the evanescent breath of contemporary auditors, 
 without one effort towards perpetuating his great name through 
 ages, and without bequeathing to English posterity the prin- 
 ciples he maintained, and his remedies against those disor- 
 ders which shook the constitution of England in his own times ? 
 No ! devoted to his own country, and, next to her, affectionate 
 to this, he wrote our creed with a pen of steel upon leaves 
 of brass. 
 
 I cannot rid myself of the long existing impression, that, 
 when King, Councils, Ministers, Parliaments, and Livery-men 
 refused to listen to the advice of Lord Chatham, he poured 
 it into the ears of an anxious public through the medium of the 
 press, and gave it, I had almost said, a supernatural force, by the 
 mystery of concealment, well knowing the oracular effect of 
 speaking from a recess which no curiosity could penetrate. 
 
 * See page 106.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 181 
 
 That some great political writer was about to appear, who 
 should shake all that could be shaken, was surmised, if not 
 predicted, in Brown's Essay, entitled " An Estimate of the 
 Manners and Principles of the Times." This able writer de- 
 scribed the unprosperous condition of his native country with a 
 sigh, and predicted its ruin unless there should be a speedy 
 amendment. The grand remedy, which he held up to the pub- 
 lic, was to operate through the votes of a people uncontaminated 
 by corruption, which had been dealt out by Sir Robert Wal- 
 pole, not, as he contended, to bribe members of Parliament to 
 vote against, but according to their conscience. Beside the re- 
 demption of the people from that system of bribery, Dr. Brown 
 speaks of the redeeming powers of a Great Minister. After 
 depicting his own idea of such a blessing, in the drawing of 
 which he doubtless had in his eye the Earl of Chatham, he 
 adds, — " There is another character belonging to a lower walk 
 of life, which might be no less strange than that which is here 
 delineated, — I mean the character of a Political Writer. 
 He would choose an untrodden path of politics, where no party- 
 man ever dared to enter. The undisguised freedom and bold- 
 ness of his manner would please the brave, astonish the weak, 
 and confound the guilty. He would be called arrogant by 
 those who call every thing arrogance that is not servility. If 
 he writ in a period when his country was declining, while he 
 pointed out the means from whence alone honest hope could 
 arise, he would be charged, by scribbling sycophants, with 
 plunging a nation in despair. As he would be defamed by the 
 dissolute great without cause, so he would be applauded by 
 an holiest people beyond his deservings." 
 
 Have we not here a glimpse of Junius ? I would not in- 
 sinuate, that the eminent ecclesiastic, whom we have cited, was 
 supernaturally endowed with the spirit of prophecy ; I mean 
 only to say, that, from his knowledge of men and things, from 
 the throne to the cottage, from the royal fleets to the water- 
 men on the Thames, he saw, in prospective, that concatenation 
 of causes and effects which must lead to results the world has 
 witnessed.
 
 182 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 His ideal minister does honor to his judgment, and his ideal 
 writer to his sagacity. Near the close of Dr. Brown's inter- 
 esting book, he remarks, that his ideal minister has been 
 found ; and we say, that his ideal great political writer has 
 also been found ; and we shall try to show that they were 
 united in the same illustrious individual. 
 
 The Letters of Junius and the speeches of Lord Chatham 
 form an epoch in the history of English literature and oratory. 
 Dr. Swift, Dean of St. Patrick's, who died about a dozen 
 years before the Rev. Dr. Brown wrote his Essay on the 
 Manners and Principles of his own times, was a party-writer, 
 and obtained his consequence and his church promotion, if not 
 his fame, from that species of writing. He was celebrated for a 
 strong, able, severe, and satirical pen, with little delicacy. 
 Some dwell with apparent horror on what they call the malig- 
 nity of Junius, who is sparing of harsh epithets, compared 
 with the harsh, indecent, and too often profane language of this 
 church dignitary. Passing over the Dean's tory principles, we 
 cannot but remark his severe denunciations of the Dissenters 
 as people unworthy the blessings of liberty. Beside, his mang- 
 ling satire marks him out as a literary savage ; so much so, 
 that, although he wrote in favor of the court and of the church, 
 his sovereign was ashamed to make him a bishop. Still Swift 
 was caressed, praised, flattered, and feared, from the throne 
 clown through the peerage and all the high offices of state. 
 Compare the severest satires of this son of the church, with 
 those of Junius, on the score of decorum, and be silent on the 
 topic of invectives. 
 
 Making due allowance for the restraining rules of both 
 Houses of Parliament, we shall find that Lord Chatham was 
 not far behind Junius in bitter sarcasms and envenomed wit. 
 The style and spirit of their invectives, and the subjects and ob- 
 jects, are very similar. The Earl of Chatham was but a young 
 member of Parliament when he castigated Mr. Walpole, then 
 an old man, in so resentful a style as to kindle the ire of some 
 of the most respectable gentlemen of the House of Commons.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 183 
 
 Nor did he always spare his old schoolfellow and friend, Hen- 
 ry Fox, Lord Holland. We adduce these instances to meet 
 the objection of some who contend, that Junius is too bitter, 
 too extremely severe, to allow us to believe, that the polite 
 Lord Chatham could be the writer of the Letters in question. 
 Moreover does the language of the man in a mask exceed in 
 harshness that used between the Parliament and the royalists in 
 the time of Charles the First. Junius, be sure, has sharper 
 points, because he had more wit than the Covenanters ; and if 
 he cut deeper than Swift, it was because his weapon was higher 
 polished and better tempered. Furthermore, does the severest 
 language of Junius surpass, or equal, that of the two cele- 
 brated Fathers of the Protestant Church, Martin Luther and 
 John Calvin ? It is the superior wit and the refined talent of 
 the Englishman, which convey the idea of greater severity 
 than that used by the German or the French reformer. Nay, 
 farther still, — when holy men of old received a divine com- 
 mand to operate a certain end, the phraseology was their own. 
 Hence the gloomy anger of one Prophet, and the horrid denun- 
 ciations of another. What reason have we for saying, that 
 Ezekiel had more malignity of heart than Isaiah ? Lord Chat- 
 ham was distinguished, above every speaker in Parliament, 
 for severity of remark, or what Hume Campbell, unluckily, 
 called " eternal invectives." Yet was this nobleman of a very 
 friendly, kind, and affectionate temper in his family, and great- 
 ly beloved by all about him ; and common observation informs 
 us, that he who is most remarkable for copia verborum is the 
 most apt, when excited, to use the sharpest diction. 
 
 Some have said, that the accomplished Earl of Chatham, 
 venerable for a rare assemblage of extraordinary virtues and 
 talents, a nobleman in whom the world beheld honor personi- 
 fied, would be restrained by the offspring of them all, — grati- 
 tude for his hereditary coronet, and four thousand a year. 
 This argument is more specious than solid. They who shud- 
 der at the chafed feelings of George the Third, from truths ut- 
 tered by Junius (for falsehoods cannot disturb a wise and good
 
 184 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 man), should recollect the personal anguish of Charles the 
 First, Louis the Sixteenth, and the Emperor Napoleon.* 
 
 As to Lord Chatham's gratitude towards his Sovereign, — 
 in which scale was the heaviest weight of obligation ? We re- 
 iterate the question ; What were the national services of the 
 Duke of Marlborough, compared with those of Chatham, who 
 did more injury to the enemies of Great Britain in four years, 
 than Marlborough did in ten ? After all, what is political 
 gratitude ? Let us learn wisdom from the example of history ; 
 and turn to Plutarch, a great master in that school of phi- 
 losophy. 
 
 From him we learn, that Marcus Brutus was mild in his 
 temper, with a greatness of mind that was superior to anger, 
 avarice, and the love of pleasure ; f firm and inflexible in his 
 opinions, and zealous in every pursuit where justice and honor 
 were concerned ; and that the people had the highest opinion 
 of his integrity and sincerity. History scarcely affords us a 
 stronger instance of kindness, partiality, and affection among 
 great men, than that which subsisted between Julius Ccesar and 
 Marcus Brutus. Indeed, the great intimacy between Caesar 
 and Servilia, the daughter of Cato and mother of Brutus, 
 when the latter was born, led many to believe, that he might 
 be Caesar's son. When Cassius and Brutus were candidates 
 for a very distinguished praetorship, Caesar said, — Cassius has 
 the strongest reason in his favor, but Brutus must have it. 
 
 We learn farther, from the same writer, that it was generally 
 believed that Brutus would be nominated to succeed him ; for 
 that, when Caesar was advised to beware of him, he laid his 
 hand on his breast and said, — Do not you think thai Brutus 
 will wait till 1 have done with this poor body ? And yet ! the 
 beloved Brutus, ornamented with every acquirement that phi- 
 
 * " I tell you with positive certainty, that our gracious [Sovereign] 
 is as callous as a stockfish to every thing hut the reproach of cowardice. 
 That alone is able to set the humors afloat. After a paper of that kind 
 he won't eat meat for a week." — Junius to Woodfall. 
 
 t See Langhom's Translat'on.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. \Q$ 
 
 losophy, rank, and reputation could give, and rich in the affec- 
 tion and confidence of Caesar, murdered him ! — his benefac- 
 tor and friend, and, as many thought, his father. 
 
 If we have, by this historical fact, removed the stumbling- 
 block thrown in our way, respecting the ingratitude of Chat- 
 ham, Plutarch supplied both the fulcrum and the lever. He 
 tells us, moreover, that the condition of Rome was such, 
 that it evidently required a master ; that Caesar was no more 
 than a tender and skilful physician, appointed by Providence 
 to heal the distempers of the state. Yet Brutus, who must 
 have known all this, murdered him ! — What then is personal 
 gratitude in the heroic heart of patriotism ? 
 
 Beside, we do not, we cannot believe, that Lord Chatham 
 ever felt bound in gratitude and affection towards the young 
 successor of George the Second. He tells us, in plain terms, 
 that he deceived him, betrayed him, and, what is never for- 
 given, duped him.* When the King wrote to Lord Chatham, 
 while sick at Hampstead, soliciting the great statesman's ad- 
 vice and assistance, the proud invalid, by returning no other 
 than a verbal answer, might have felt like Diogenes, when he 
 requested Alexander to stand out of the sunshine, — that is, Do 
 not deprive my fleeting soul of the sunshine of its own reflec- 
 tions ; do not deprive me of that comfort which you cannot 
 give. That Chatham's honors " had been dearly earned," 
 no one will deny. Look at the history of his labors, and the 
 fruits of them ; and see who gathered these. 
 
 By what strong cords of gratitude was Brutus bound to 
 Caesar ! What was that spirit which instigated him to destroy 
 the life of his best friend and benefactor ? We answer, Pa- 
 triotism. What impelled Junius Brutus first to scourge, and 
 then to put to death, his own son ? Patriotism. And what 
 moved Chatham, — if William Pitt and Junius be one and the 
 same person, — to destroy, not the life, but the character and 
 influence of Grafton, Bute, Bedford, and Mansfield 9 We 
 
 * Speech in the House of Peers, March, 1770. See also Wilkes's 
 Letter to Junius, Sept. 12, 1771, in Woodtall's Junius. 
 
 24
 
 186 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 answer, Patriotism. And what animated him, not to murder 
 the British Caesar, but to rouse him, alarm him, caution and 
 advise him to return from the error of his ways, and live glo- 
 riously in the hearts of his people, and in history. His lan- 
 guage to his Sovereign was firm, but honest ; severe, yet 
 studiously respectful. He indeed spoke daggers, but used 
 none as Brutus did. Had Chatham, under the shadow of 
 a great name, been detected for his conduct towards his 
 King and benefactor, he might well reply, in the words of 
 Shakspeare's Brutus, — " If there be any dear friend of Caesar's, 
 and that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar ; — this 
 is my answer, — Not that I loved Ccesar less, but that 1 loved 
 England more." 
 
 One word more on the subject of gratitude, because it has 
 been the bass-string which has been long harped upon in England 
 and in America. The King of Britain is the high steward of 
 the wealth and honors of the realm ; and it is his duty to be- 
 stow them according to merit. Public servants are public 
 creditors ; and the King is the constituted paymaster. Sir 
 Jeffery Amherst, a brave and meritorious general, who com- 
 pletely executed in this country, what Lord Chatham planned 
 in England, a great favorite of Mr. Pitt and of Junius, was 
 rewarded by a peerage and pension ; so likewise was Sir Guy 
 Carlton, Admiral Nelson, and Lord George Germain. Had 
 the King raised Pitt to a Dukedom, and the nation built him a 
 palace equal to that at Woodstock, would it have been too 
 much ? We in these regions may view things through a 
 cloud of ignorance ; but the inequality of rewards appears 
 strange to us. One general sits hours quietly and silently 
 on horse-back, while the troops of several nations entrap 
 " the Lion of the forest" and the fortunate commander ob- 
 tains for it the highest honors Great Britain can bestow ; — 
 honors far greater than those bestowed on a renowned States- 
 man, who held in his hand the balance of Europe, and the peace 
 of the world ; — the man who, by his capacious mind, stern 
 virtue, disinterestedness, unwearied industry, and patriotism
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 187 
 
 that never faltered, acquired more influence and control, than 
 Cardinal Wolsey with all his riches, host of servile depend- 
 ents, boundless royal favor, and every aid the superstition of 
 the day could afford. And yet Chatham was comparatively 
 poor ; and, but for individual private bounty, would have been 
 really so. 
 
 If you compare the state of affairs in the latter part of the 
 reign of the Second George with the condition of things in the 
 early part of the reign of his grandson, you will admit that the 
 difference was enough to engender disgust in the breast of the 
 prime agent of the nation's former glory. The retrospect and 
 the prospect must have made an equally sad impression. He 
 must have known thoroughly the character of the young mon- 
 arch in all its unyielding self-sufficiency, from his pupilage to his 
 accession in 1761, and through the intervening space to 1769. 
 
 Conceive, then, a veteran Statesman, a very well-studied 
 philologist and consummate orator, determined to save his 
 country from farther degradation and disgrace. What mode 
 would such a character naturally adopt ? Not that of a formal 
 audience with a mother-ruled King, when he would have been 
 treated with every external token of profound respect and 
 sign of deference, but with a fixed resolution not to follow his 
 advice, or pay any regard to his warnings. Would he con- 
 tinue his solemn and pathetic expostulations in the House 
 of Peers ? He knew, alas ! that House loo well. Would 
 he address the people through the medium of the press, 
 adding to it the weight of his own great name ? Assuredly 
 not ; for, ever since George the Third came to the throne, a 
 variety of means had been used to depreciate Lord Chatham's 
 wisdom, lessen his worth, detract from his merit, defame his 
 high character, and misrepresent his motives and ultimate 
 views.* It appears from the daily publications of those times, 
 that every contrivance which malice, jealousy, fear, revenge, 
 
 * When Dr. Johnson submitted certain partisan essays to Lord 
 North, there was this sentence, which his Lordship erased from the 
 manuscript, — " Perhaps the Americans would like a King William."
 
 188 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 and female spite could devise, or bribery effectuate, was 
 called into requisition to destroy the influence of the great 
 Statesman. Rumor, swelled by spies prowling around his hab- 
 itation, represented the great man with unstrung nerves, and 
 every faculty prostrated by paroxysms resembling hysterics, in 
 which he would weep like a child. This was spread so far and 
 wide, that his famous contemporary and great admirer, the re- 
 nowned Frederic, King of Prussia, has mentioned it in some 
 of his letters. All this is possible ; for Lord Chatham's he- 
 reditary disease, joined to a supervening disorder, and his 
 critical period of life, shook his susceptible nervous system, 
 as the fever shook that of Julius Ccesar in Spain j 
 
 " When that same eye, whose hend did awe the world, 
 
 Did lose his lustre. 
 
 Ay, and that tongue of his, that hade the Romans 
 Mark him and write his speeches in their books, 
 Alas ! it cried, Give me some drink, — 
 As a sick girl." 
 
 But his health improving, he, to the surprise of many, and 
 the sore disappointment of some, regained his former vigor of 
 mind, and once more electrified the Senate. When that 
 failed to have the desired effect, how would such a character, 
 in such circumstances, probably conduct ? 1 answer, in the 
 very mode which Junius adopted, — A fearful hand-writing 
 on the wall of the palace, rendered doubly impressive by its 
 halo of mystery ! 
 
 We of Anglo-Saxon descent are more or less superstitious. 
 Generally speaking, superstition agitates less powerfully minds 
 moderately gifted, and of ordinary information. It operates, I 
 had almost said incubates, upon the extremes of the human intel- 
 lect ; — I mean poetical genius and ignorance. One hair's 
 breadth beyond the circumference of the circle of each man's 
 knowledge leaves him on the vertiginous border of the dark 
 ocean of superstition, where the giddy and bewildered imagi- 
 nation floats in a boundless sea of uncertainty, without sun, star, 
 compass, or anchor, or any means of determining his latitude or
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 189 
 
 longitude. Such is restless superstition ! In a cloud ambiguous, 
 in a vapor from such a troubled ocean, was enveloped Juni- 
 us, who, like the ghost of the King of Denmark, acids terror 
 to his sepulchral voice. 
 
 Now I question if human judgment could have devised a 
 more effectual method of rousing a deluded monarch, influ- 
 encing and influenced by a secret, irresponsible cabinet, and 
 losing rapidly the confidence of his people, than that startling 
 exhibition of flaming Letters, reflected on the interior walls of 
 his palace, by an Unknown being. 
 
 A steady and uniform opinion, long since imbibed, has rivet- 
 ted in my mind the belief, that those solemn warnings were 
 written by the hand of William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. 
 Nor have I once, during fifty years, been able to dissociate the 
 idea. I contend, that the hypothesis suits that nobleman, and 
 fits no other personage whatever ; and the more I have pon- 
 dered, inquired, compared and balanced one thing against 
 another, the deeper has been the impression, that it was the 
 powerful voice of that great but angry Statesman, which sound- 
 ed in the ears of the King and resounded through the nation, — 
 " Thou hast been weighed in the balance — and found 
 wanting ! Thy Kingdom is departing from thee ! " 
 
 A prophecy, long since, more than half fulfilled ! * 
 
 It seems that Mr. Pitt, disappointed in his ruling passion, 
 arms, by the gout, acted like a wise but ill-favored virgin, who, 
 conscious that she could not attract attention by her personal 
 charms, resolves to make up the defect by sedulous cultiva- 
 tion of mind and behaviour. So Pitt, when forced to relin- 
 quish the fascinating pomp of war, redoubled his diligence in 
 disciplining one of those quick, strong, and brilliant intellects, 
 to whose captivating powers we give the name of genius. A 
 
 * " Their declaration gave spirit and argument to the colonies ; and 
 while, perhaps, they meant no more than the ruin of a minister, they 
 in effect divided the one half of the empire from the other." — Junius, 
 Letter the First.
 
 190 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 young man of Mr. Pitt's lofty spirit and military cast of dispo- 
 sition, who could read regularly Bailey's Dictionary, more co- 
 pious in words than Johnson's, twice over, and who could dig 
 in Barrow's quarry for materials for his monument, must have 
 had a brain equal to any task his judgment chose to lay upon 
 it. With the same view he studied not only Shakspeare but 
 Spenser. Favored with a muse of fire, such an ardent stu- 
 dent must have considered every word he used with the same 
 attention that the mathematician does a figure. He was adroit 
 in the use of the file and the burnisher without weakening the 
 metal. To be convinced of this, compare his first speeches in 
 Parliament in the year 1736, with some later ones ; make the 
 same comparison with the Letters of Junius, and there will 
 be found in each a progressive improvement ; so true is that 
 voice of antiquity which said, — The gods sell every thing to 
 Industry. 
 
 Mr. Pitt, when young, associated with distinguished men older 
 than himself, whence he imbibed that freedom of speech, easy, 
 unembarrassed manner, and imposing assurance, which made 
 its way through every thing, till it became a habit ; and what 
 with the irritations of gout, and pressure of various business, 
 it may have required the vigilance of that dramatic part of be- 
 haviour, denominated good breeding, to make it bearable. 
 Great commanders are apt to acquire a reserved demeanor, 
 short diction, and peremptory tone. To a noble and com- 
 manding figure, a perfect mastery over an admirable voice, de- 
 liberate and collected faculties, was added a manner peculiarly 
 fascinating. In the same speech he would descend occasion- 
 ally to colloquial familiarity, and rise incidentally to epic sub- 
 limity. His irony was strong, provoking, and dignified, his 
 invectives terrible, and his ridicule irresistible. We would re- 
 mark, however, that when a man in any station or profession 
 has become transcendently eminent, every thing he says elicits 
 applause, while criticism and censure stand deaf, dumb, and 
 blind. Take an example.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 191 
 
 When Mr. Pitt's brother-in-law, the Right Hon. George 
 Grenville, was speaking earnestly in the House of Commons, 
 he not only raised a loud laugh at his expense, but actually 
 fixed upon that able and very respectable man the ridiculous 
 appellation of " the Gentle Shepherd." The occasion was no 
 more than this. There was a very popular song or ditty, bor- 
 dering on the silly, sung everywhere, — in the theatres, great 
 and small, and in every street and every square and court in 
 London, even to annoyance, by every beggarly ballad-singer 
 and kitchen-maid, and was in every mouth and every ear ; 
 the chorus to every stanza was, — " Where, — oh tvhere, — Gentle 
 Shepherd, — tell me where." Mr. Grenville was speaking, 
 solemnly, of the discouraging lack of money for a certain pur- 
 pose then under debate, when he exclaimed oratorically, — 
 " Wliere is your money, — where are your means, — yes, — where, 
 I say, is your money?" and then sat down to give more effect 
 to his pathetic question. At this moment Mr. Pitt hobbled 
 slowly out of the House with his flannels and crutches, hum- 
 ming the tune, — " Oh where, — Oh Gentle Shepherd ! tell me 
 where, — Oh where ! " The effect was instantaneous and elec- 
 tric, and the tout ensemble was irresistible. The House 
 shook with laughter, and settled for ever on Mr. George 
 Grenville the appellation of " the Gentle Shepherd." 
 
 This mirthful anecdote shows, better than a long disserta- 
 tion, the magical ascendancy of Pitt over the Parliament of 
 England. Napoleon, in all his power and glory, had hardly 
 more ascendancy over his council, than the illustrious Com- 
 moner over the British Senate, by every species of oratory, 
 from the solemn to the playful. 
 
 One anecdote more. Horace Walpole, afterwards Lord 
 Orford, attended a " caucus," held at the Cockpit, in Novem- 
 ber, 1755, where Mr. Pitt made a long speech, which he 
 thus describes ; — " Pitt surpassed himself; and then I need 
 not tell you that he surpassed Cicero and Demosthenes. What 
 a figure would they, with their formal, labored, cabinet orations, 
 make vis-a-vis his manly and dashing eloquence. I never sus-
 
 J 92 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 pected Pitt of such an universal armoury. I knew he had a 
 Gorgon's head, composed of bayonets and pistols, but little 
 thought that he could tickle to death with a feather. On the 
 first debate [on the Hanoverian and Russian treaties], Hume 
 Campbell, whom the Duke of Newcastle has retained as the 
 most abusive council he could find against Pitt, attacked him 
 for his ' eternal invectives.'' Oh ! since the last phillipic of Bil- 
 lingsgate memory, you never heard such an invective as Pitt 
 returned ! Campbell was annihilated ! Pitt, like an angry 
 wasp, seems to have left his sting in the wound, and has since 
 assumed a style of delicate ridicule and repartee. But think 
 how charming a ridicule must that be that lasts, and rises, 
 flash after flash, for an hour and a half ! ' : 
 
 Now such an ambidextrous genius could write any thing, 
 any how, of any body, and trust posterity with his reputation. 
 On one occasion, he looked Lord Chief Justice Mansfield 
 down by absolute staring ; and, after directing all eyes on the 
 mild dignity of that great man, and saying that he should use 
 but few words, but those should be daggers, he exclaimed, in 
 a voice of thunder, " Judge Felix trembles : He shall hear 
 from me some other day" — and sat down. Supposing Chatham 
 to be Junius, can we wonder at his bitter invectives in print 
 against Mansfield, after reflecting on what fell from his lips in 
 Parliament ? 
 
 We can exhibit Chatham's thoughts to the eye upon paper 
 at this distance of time and space, but we lose his manner. 
 His warm admirers have said,* You should have seen him, that 
 you might have witnessed " the terrors of his beak and the 
 lightnings of his eye." They talk too of his angry expression, 
 and look of ineffable contempt, and say that he sometimes stared 
 his opponent out of countenance, — then, in a strong, grand, 
 and thundering voice, poured upon the abashed subject a hot 
 and heavy torrent of invective, as in the instance just men- 
 tioned, leaving the House in a languor of amazement. 
 
 * Butler's Reminiscences.
 
 LIFE AND CHARACTER OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 193 
 
 Beside the awe-imposing looks of Lord Chatham, we hear of 
 his fascinating bow of condescending protection. Consum- 
 mate orators must necessarily be complete actors ; and it is 
 said, that no man becomes a great actor on the stage until he 
 has surmounted the common feelings of men, and put his 
 foot upon tender-heartedness. Is this applicable to our great 
 Statesman or to Junius ? It has been remarked, that Lord 
 Chatham's commanding eloquence had a tendency to impress 
 the listener with a something more to be dreaded than his mere 
 words, that the man was greater than the orator ; whereas in 
 Burke the orator appeared greater than the man.* 
 
 I am at a loss for the proper epithet to designate that kind 
 of vituperative oratory in which Lord Chatham sometimes in- 
 dulged. I venture, however, to assert, that there is notlnng in 
 our language which resembles it so much as certain portions of 
 tjie Letters of Junius. But I do not restrict the parallel to the 
 raging style of invective ; I extend the observation to the care- 
 ful and apparently simple diction in the speeches of the one, 
 and in the writings of the other ; — simple, select, and natural, 
 like the exquisite statuary of ancient Greece, it is less striking 
 at first, because nearer to nature than the art of the moderns, 
 and never tiring the gaze of refined taste. 
 
 One more confirmatory instance of the effects of Pitt's ora- 
 tory, or the dread of it, on the hardy John Wilkes, who men- 
 
 * Our North American Indians understand this perfectly. With 
 faces painted to frightfulness, they accompany their furious orations 
 in their treaty-councils with horrid grimaces, yells, and flourishes of 
 the tomahawk, to make an impression of something greater than reali- 
 ty. I should like to have seen the modern Demosthenes in one of our 
 American assemblies, wound up to the highest pitch of his oratorial 
 powers, vis-a-vis Jarnes Otis, Samuel or John Adams, or Patrick Henry. 
 Such a great orator might, for a moment, confuse these men, but never 
 daunt them. I doubt if such hornbeam*fibred men as those pioneers 
 of our revolution would have been daunted by "the terrors of his beak 
 or the lightning [of his eye." If great admiration be a suspension of 
 reason, and if we are liable sometimes to have our faculties struck, for 
 a moment, into undiscerning amazement, the elastic mind of true 
 courage soon recovers, and acts for itself in its own defence* 
 
 25
 
 194 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 tioned to Reminiscent Butler, that, once when Mr. Pitt rose 
 and began to speak in a solemn and austere manner, he, Mr. 
 Wilkes, expecting a castigation for a conscious fault,* thought 
 the thunder was to fall upon him ; and he declared that he 
 never, while at Westminster-school, felt greater terror, when 
 called up to be chastised, than he did while the uncertainty 
 lasted ; or felt greater jubilation when he was pardoned, than 
 when he found the bolt was destined for another head. The 
 like awe-imposing effect was experienced by Mr. Wilkes when 
 he approached Junius, though a curtain intervened. He 
 stops and considers, if he can, without profanation, approach 
 nearer the object of his idolatry. 
 
 The celebrated Lord Chesterfield bears this testimony to 
 the superior eloquence of Lord Chatham. " He was haughty, 
 imperious, impatient of contradiction, and overbearing. He 
 had manners and address ; but one might discern through 
 them too great a consciousness of his own superior talents. 
 His eloquence was of every kind. His invectives terrible, and 
 uttered with such energy of diction, and such dignity of ac- 
 tion and countenance, that he intimidated those who were the 
 most willing and the best able to encounter him. Their arms 
 fell out of their hands, and they shrunk under the ascendant 
 which his genius gained over them." 
 
 It was in the year 1766, that Lord Chatham first advocated 
 in Parliament the principles of our resistance to their assumed 
 right to tax these unrepresented colonies. These were his pa- 
 thetic words, — " When the resolution was taken in this House 
 to tax America, I was in bed. If I could have endured to 
 have been carried in my bed, so great was the agitation of my 
 mind for the consequences, I would have solicited some kind 
 hand to have laid me down on this floor, that I might have 
 borne my testimony against it." He doubtless remembered 
 the stern character of those thoughtful Englishmen, who quit- 
 ted their native land in search of freedom, and found it in a 
 
 * Bribing the captain of a vessel to land certain London voters in 
 Norway, who took passage for Berwick, where they meant to vote.
 
 CHARACTER AND DEATH OF THE EARL OF CHATHAM. 195 
 
 desert. He knew that such men, so transplanted, had left 
 sons that would resist unto blood, and if so, our independence 
 would be the natural consequence. His mind's eye saw this ; 
 and, courageous as he was, he shuddered at the prospect, 
 believing that so soon as Britain and America became seriously 
 roused to internecine combat, vindictive France would, by siding 
 with us, revenge the severe blows she received from England, 
 when Pitt directed the war against her. Under these appre- 
 hensions, the great Statesman appeared unhappy, towards the 
 close of his life, and his utterance perplexed, as if halting be- 
 tween two opinions, when the cause of the mother country and 
 our independence were subjects of debate. The supremacy 
 of Parliament was to be asserted, yet not exercised. He 
 dreaded the revival of the dangerous question of taxation, 
 " which ought" to use the words of Junius, " to have been 
 buried in oblivion" See his first Letter. 
 
 As an advocate of English liberty, according to the standard 
 erected at the revolution in 1688, Lord Chatham rejoiced at 
 our resistance, since our enslavement would but rivet the 
 chains of Englishmen ; as our alliance with France would pro- 
 duce arrogant triumphs, and possibly revive the detestable 
 maxim of — Delenda est Carthago. France had fought Britain 
 with one blade only of the shears of destruction. Had Ameri- 
 ca joined her at the French revolution, and acted consenta- 
 neously, Britain would probably have experienced something 
 like a second French subjugation ; and the two rivetted blades 
 would have completed the shears of her fate. 
 
 Under some such apprehension, the venerable Seer felt as 
 a loyal subject and true Briton, — his patriotism strong in 
 death; — and what with exhaustion from disease, anxiety, and 
 conflicting passions, occasioned by some imprudent remarks 
 in the course of debate from a noble Duke, his friend, when 
 he rose to reply, he faltered, and sunk fatally under a con- 
 fused idea of impending evils,* leaving behind him a glorious 
 and untainted memory ! This was in the House of Lords, 
 in the year one thousand seven hundred and seventy-right. 
 * Lord Chatham expired at his own home.
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 CERTAIN DIFFICULTIES POINTED OUT, AND DISCUSSED, 
 
 Having avowed our belief, that Pitt, Earl of Chatham, was 
 the author of the Letters under the signature of Junius, and 
 given a sketch of his life and character, it will be expected 
 that we give our reasons for the opinion. We acknowledge 
 the task to be encumbered with serious difficulties ; yet we 
 venture to encounter them, and should we fail, we would rather 
 lie under the imputation of presumptuousness than cowardice. 
 
 The theme has exercised cultivated and scrutinizing minds, 
 not merely as a question of amusing curiosity, but as involving 
 the history of the greatest men of the age, and of the greatest 
 event, comprehending principles and conduct which led, not 
 only to the independence of these English colonies on Britain, 
 but the separation of all America from the government of 
 Europe. It stops not here, but their discussion is reflected 
 back upon the old world with increased light and warmth, 
 changing, as it proceeds, the crescent to a full orb, operating 
 beneficently on the affairs of all men.* 
 
 Most of those, who have gone before us, had made their attack 
 by a coup-de-main and failed ; warned by their discomfiture, 
 we proceed slowly. The fortifications we are about to recon- 
 
 * .Algiers, a kingdom as large as all New England, has just sur- 
 rendered to enlightened France ; and the Turkish empire trembles 
 at the two-fold power that surrounds her.
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 197 
 
 noitre are works of a great master, — a Vauban in the art of 
 attack and defence. No one has circumvallated and entrench- 
 ed himself with more skill and caution than Junius. He has 
 not only put into practice every known art, but resorted to the 
 most refined species of deception ; — hence we pay little regard 
 to his assertions whenever his individual safety is concerned. 
 
 We have said that there has been more attention directed to 
 the dress of Junius, than to his person, — more observance of his 
 style and diction, than of his mind, feelings, rank, and condition. 
 The best way of judging of the soul of such a writer,-— the surest 
 way of scanning his principles, motives, and intentions, would be 
 to translate his writings into the Dutch language. This would 
 be to strip him of that which dazzles the eye, and diverts atten- 
 tion from the main object. It would be changing Junius's ar- 
 mour of polished steel for a common garb. It is very hard to 
 know a man who is all mind, and whose primary object is dis- 
 guise and concealment. That every writer of genius has a 
 style and manner by which he is known, is, in a great measure, 
 true ; so every man has a natural gait and gesture ; but the 
 drill-sergeant and the dancing-master alter these peculiarities 
 for the exercise of the field and the ball-room, where disci- 
 pline and art bridle nature. So in writing, discipline may put 
 on a habit of disguise, provided the assumed dress be inferior 
 to the original one. But whenever the individual discusses the 
 same subject, at one time as a writer, and at another as an 
 orator, it is very difficult to depart from his natural manner 
 without dishonoring truth, or soiling principle. Now, the same 
 determined national principles run through the writings of Ju- 
 nius, which shine in the speeches of Lord Chatham. 
 
 That such a writer as Junius should speak in a public as- 
 sembly like Chatham, no one will contend, who thinks of Ad- 
 dison and Gibbon ; but that such a consummate orator as 
 Chatham should be able to write like Junius, few will deny. 
 The utmost resolution, in the first case, might fail, but may al- 
 ways succeed in the last. The most accurate engraver of the 
 most tasteful and beautiful chirography commonly writes worse
 
 198 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 than other men. So if the most finished orator would but take 
 the pains, he could, by striving, make himself an equally spirited 
 and polished writer, as was the ambitious Cicero among the Ro- 
 mans, and Burke among the Britons ; — Dii laborious omnia 
 vendunt, — the gods do not give, but sell every thing to indus- 
 try. Lord Chatham was a prodigy of industry. It is said, 
 that, when a young man, he read Bailey's Dictionary, the 
 best then extant, regularly through twice, and that he com- 
 mitted several of Dr. Isaac Barrow's sermons to*memory for 
 the sake of their energetic diction.* How long would it take 
 such a genius as Chatham to acquire a knowledge of his 
 native tongue equal to that attained by an inferior star in the 
 political firmament of Britain, John Home Tooke ? 
 
 Allowing the Earl of Chatham to have been, what he cer- 
 tainly was, a polished scholar, of transcendent eloquence, with 
 a rich and exhaustless mine of political information and ener- 
 getic expressions, can it not be conceived, that such an ex- 
 perienced minister, in his horce solitaries, could give to epis- 
 tles, or short essays, the strength and precision of Barrow, with 
 the pencil of Milton, and yet appear like neither of them ? 
 Beside, who shall set bounds to the combined force of genius, 
 judgment, industry, courage, and deep resentment, when winged 
 by a belief of the danger of his country fast rolling to the brink 
 of a precipice ? A condition of things enough to make the 
 dumb speak. Reflect, reader, on the case before us. Orato- 
 ry had uttered its warning voice in vain. The utmost powers 
 of eloquence had failed. The love of country was ready to 
 resign itself to despair. 
 
 But patriotism rallied and took a new stand, resolved to 
 effect by the Pen what the transitory pomp of declamation had 
 failed to accomplish. To wing the strongest arguments with 
 the bitterest invectives and the keenest satire, requires some- 
 thing more than the breath of man. It requires that most 
 potent of all instruments, the Pen, a weapon most to be relied 
 
 * Butler's Reminiscences.
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 199 
 
 on ; and not the less so if the hand only appears upon the 
 wall, while the body to which it belongs is invisible.* 
 
 In fixing the authorship of Junius where we think it be- 
 longs, we calculated on encountering great difficulties, — very 
 great difficulties ; and we have met what we expected. The 
 birth-place of Homer has never been ascertained ; yet that 
 mighty genius did not exert his extraordinary powers, and 
 tax his ingenuity, subtilty, and contrivance, to delude the 
 people, and lure them away from the thing sought, as Junius 
 has studiously and intently done, purposely to elude our search 
 by systematic deception, in order to secure himself and family 
 from destruction. In forming such a resolution, nay, determi- 
 nation, he must have stipulated with his conscience respecting 
 his infringement of truth. Instances of such trespass on strict 
 veracity may be found in the history of every age and people, 
 even in holy history. Abraham denied Sarah to be his wife ; 
 that pattern of purity and a good conscience, Joseph, said to 
 his brothers, all of whom he knew, — " By the life of King 
 Pharaoh ! ye are spies, come to see the nakedness of the 
 land." The conduct of the prophet Jeremiah, in his inter- 
 course with the king, may be mentioned ; and what is still 
 stronger, Peter, the patron Saint of three quarters of the Chris- 
 tian world, went beyond them all in falsehood. We hope 
 to tread this holy ground with caution and due reverence. 
 " Skin for skin ; all that a man hath will he give for his 
 life." 
 
 Concerning the concealment of truth from those ivho have no 
 right to be made acquainted with it, much may be said. He 
 who has read most of history will be best able to settle the point, 
 when we say, that it has been the practice of some of the most 
 
 * The arrow, the most potent of all visible weapons, is a compound 
 of the spear and the feather, — the pen and the sword; the one to pierce 
 the hostile invader, the other to direct it aright. It ought to have 
 been the emblem, or ensign armorial of these United States, instead of 
 Jove's solitary bird of prey, wliose usual residence is on some light- 
 ning-blasted tree, or barren rock in a dreary desert, the waste of 
 ages.
 
 200 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 distinguished sovereigns, ambassadors, generals, and reformers, 
 in all ages, to withhold the truth, when they thought prudence 
 forbade it to be revealed ; and this has been called wisdom. 
 
 When Junius was uttering oracular truths from behind a 
 curtain, what right had the people, or the law itself, to demand 
 his name or see his person. The guilty Assyrian asked the 
 prophet Daniel only the meaning of the terrific hand-writing, 
 and, when deeply afflicted by the prediction of the calamities 
 about to come upon his kingdom, he demanded not the sight 
 of the person who inscribed the portentous letters on the walls 
 of his palace. So George the Third saw only the hand, with- 
 out knowing the person to whom it belonged, and disbelieved 
 the prediction, until Time and History gave the interpretation. 
 
 It is an equally arduous and ungrateful task to vindicate the 
 use of equivocation, and evasion of truth, by a man of otherwise 
 unimpeached integrity, and possessing a high sense of honor. 
 Very rigid moralists, bookish men of the closet, secluded from 
 the world, say, that an honest man dares no more look a false- 
 hood, than utter one. But stratagem, the sublime part of the 
 art of war, what is it other than to deceive ? — to hold up an 
 appearance of something which is not intended, while under 
 that mask some important object is secured ? The best and 
 greatest men of this country, and of others, have added to their 
 renown by practising it. 
 
 From subterfuges like those just mentioned, the main diffi- 
 culties attending our determination of the person of Junius 
 arise ; and were they absolutely inconsistent with that high and 
 honorable character which we attribute to him, our researches 
 would be at an end. But even should it be impossible to vin- 
 dicate such practices inforo divino, may we not apologize and 
 extenuate them when speaking from man to his fellow-man ? 
 Do not w y e find every day, that fear of personal harm, loss of 
 property, and dread of public shame, induce a majority of the 
 people, and not a small one, to go beyond evasion even to a 
 flat denial ? Our very laws countenance it in the plea of 
 " not guilty." Nor is such conduct ever made a question;
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. OQ1 
 
 when a man has to do with a highwayman, a pirate, or a mur- 
 derer. Fortunately we have a competent judge of the very 
 point at issue, in the great English moralist, Samuel Johnson, 
 which we give in the following dialogue between that great 
 man and his devoted disciple, Boswell.. " Supposing, Sir, 
 the person who wrote Junius were asked whether he was the 
 author, might he deny it 9 " — Johnson. " I don't know what 
 to say to this. If you were sure that he wrote Junius, would 
 you, if he denied it, think as well of him afterwards ? Yet it 
 may be urged, that when a man has no right to ask, you may 
 refuse to communicate ; and there is no other effectual mode 
 of preserving a secret, the discovery of which may be very 
 hurtful to you, but aflat denial; for if you are silent, or hesi- 
 tate, or evade, it will be held equivalent to a confession. But 
 stay; here is another case. Supposing the author had told 
 me confidentially, that he had written Junius, and I were ask- 
 ed if he had, I should hold myself at liberty to deny it, as be- 
 ing under a previous promise, expressed or implied, to conceal 
 it. Now, what I ought to do for the author, may I not do 
 for myself "? " * 
 
 Junius had the confidence to say to his printer, — " Be as^ 
 sured, that it is not, in the nature of things, that they, or you, 
 or any body else, should ever know me, unless I make myself 
 known. All arts, or inquiries, or rewards, would be equally 
 ineffectual." We are therefore prepared to doubt, if not de- 
 ny, any assertion or insinuation concerning himself, because he 
 
 * I should wish to know what the strict followers of George Fox 
 and William Ptnn would have said to Samuel Johnson's case of con- 
 science. The Earl of Chatham said, in the House of Peers, in 1770, — 
 " I do not say, my Lords, that corruption lies here, or that corruption 
 lies there ; but, if any gentleman in England were to ask me, whether 
 I thought both Houses of Parliament were bribed, I should laugh in 
 his face and say, — ' Sir, it is not so ! '" Does the laugh sanctify the 
 falsehood ; or might the Peer, who " on honor's cap is the very button" \ 
 jitter words contrary to what he knew was the truth. 
 
 f Shakspeare. 
 
 26
 
 202 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 starts fair with the public, and says, in pretty plain terms, — I will,, 
 by every means in my power, conceal myself. I am the sole 
 depository of my own secret. We remove this bold asser- 
 tion at once, by pronouncing the thing to be impossible in the 
 nature of things, and we shall prove it by his own words, un- 
 less the grave had closed upon his scribes and copyists before 
 he wrote his Dedication. 
 
 When such an eminent personage, as the one we suppose 
 to be the author of the Letters, exalted above his peers by 
 force of superior and varied talents, had resolved to address, 
 anonymously, the King, the Parliament, and the people of 
 England ; to reprehend one, to reprove and reproach the oth- 
 ers ; to assail with the keenest satire and the sharpest invectives 
 certain obnoxious individuals in high stations, his first, his chief- 
 est care must have been that of his own security, — absolute and 
 perfect concealment of his person. He knew that every thing, 
 character, usefulness, influence, and even existence, depended 
 on impenetrable concealment.* It was necessary this con- 
 cealment should extend, not merely to the external evidence, 
 as the hand-writing and the transmission of the letters, but to 
 the internal evidence that might be gathered from style, man- 
 ner, facts, and sentiments, communicated in them. If discov- 
 ery might not have been fatal to his existence, prosecution and 
 conviction of libel might have been utterly destructive of his 
 fame, fortune, influence, and happiness. He must have con- 
 sidered well the thin partition which divides great fame from the 
 deepest misfortune in kings and prime ministers. While de- 
 liberating on his plan, he must have weighed his own powers and 
 means, before pre-determination took a step, and have been wide 
 awake to every probable and possible danger of discovery. 
 He must have premised never to utter a word that might direct 
 attention to his person, excite suspicion of his rank, or en- 
 courage a guess of his peculiar character or station beyond 
 that of marked respectability, which he could not conceal. 
 
 * " I am sure I should not survive the discovery three days." — Junius.
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 203 
 
 Above all, he must have presumed on his power of diverting 
 the prying eye of curiosity in such a city as London, which he 
 knew would be very busy in hunting out his personality. To 
 obviate this great danger he must have agreed with his con- 
 science not to boggle at evasions and deceptions and denials ; 
 bestowing, at the same time, on himself, a harmless sneer, 
 grounded on his age or morbid infirmity, and dropping now and 
 then a seemingly careless, though deeply studied phrase or 
 sentence of commendation and respect, all calculated to divert 
 the mind of the reader from the real object of the nation's cu- 
 riosity and the court's vengeance. Examples of this may be 
 seen here and there in the Letters of Junius relative to the 
 venerable Chatham, which, though sarcastic, are softened 
 down by degrees, until they end in a remarkable strain of 
 panegyric. 
 
 This conduct is neither strange nor unwarrantable. All ani- 
 mated nature has more or less of it. 
 
 O thou Goddess .' 
 
 Thou divine nature ! 
 
 that teachest the sitting or nursing partridge never to rise from 
 directly over her nest, but to run creeping along in the grass 
 to some distance from it, before she exposes herself on the 
 wing. She as instinctively stops her flight at as remote a 
 distance from her nest, and returns to it under the cover of the 
 
 herbage. 
 
 " 'T is wonderful, 
 
 That an invisible instinct should frame them 
 To protection unlearn'd, — safety untaught ; 
 Security not seen from others." 
 Next to mere instinct, and very like it, comes the wiliness 
 of the savage of our forests in his war with white men, whom 
 he seldom fails to circumvent or elude. It is situation, cir- 
 cumstances, and necessity, that excite mind, muscle, and in- 
 stinct, to self-preservation. Within the circle of the idea here 
 started, what manifold subterfuges, lures, resources, refined de- 
 ceptions, and juggling might be practised by one of the ablest, 
 most indefatigable, best informed, prompt, and most sapient
 
 204 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 of the sons of men, — all sense, all intellect, — a general, a sen- 
 tinel, an orator, a consummate politician, a juggler, a spirit pres- 
 ent in every department, and acquainted with all the opera- 
 tions of the body politic, and its limbs diplomatic, — a man in 
 whom decrepitude of body sharpened his mental and instinc- 
 tive faculties, always on the stretch till he became more than a 
 match for any other man. Such a man alone could have been 
 the author of the Letters, and been able, during the long 
 course of three years, to have transmitted them, and corres- 
 ponded with the printer of them, undetected. 
 
 Assuming that Junius and Lord Chatham were the same, 
 we meet, in the first letter, a passage that appears, at the first 
 blush of the business, fatal to our hypothesis. It follows. 
 
 " When Mr. Grenville was placed at the head of the Treasu- 
 ry, he felt the impossibility of Great Britain's supporting such 
 an establishment as her former successes had made indispen- 
 sable, and, at the same time, of giving any sensible relief to 
 foreign trade and to the weight of the public debt. He thought 
 it equitable, that those of the empire, who had been benefited 
 most by the expenses of the war, should contribute something 
 to the expenses of the peace ; and he had no doubt of the con- 
 stitutional right vested in Parliament to raise the contribu- 
 tion. 
 
 " But," says Junius, " unfortunately for this country, Mr. 
 Grenville was, at any rate, to be distressed because he was 
 minister ; and Mr. Pitt and Lord Camden were to be the 
 patrons of America, because they were in opposition. Their 
 declaration gave spirit and argument to the colonies, and while, 
 perhaps they meant no more than the ruin of a minister, they, 
 in effect, divided one half of the empire from the other." 
 
 This is a profound and labored paragraph, with an insinua- 
 tion, which the writer tried to abet by adding thereto a note in 
 these words, — " Yet Junius has been called the partisan of 
 Lord Chatham.''''
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 205 
 
 Place yourself, reader, in the situation of Junius, actuated 
 by all those views he manifestly entertained ; possessing a fund 
 of information respecting the court and the government, so 
 minute and extensive, as none but an experienced courtier could 
 have accumulated ; projecting a series of Letters to his coun- 
 trymen, instilling principles of civil liberty, and the necessity 
 of restraining the royal prerogative, as well as effecting a gene- 
 ral reform, which alone Junius seemed to think could save 
 the empire from ruin ; uniting at once talents of the highest 
 order, with an indifference to office and emolument, which 
 his very concealment makes unquestionable ; and very proba- 
 bly feeling sore by a sense of injury from the monarch, 
 and insults from his interior, irresponsible cabinet. Let the 
 reader, I say, thus substantiating the shadow, ask himself, — Who 
 is the man most likely to be charged with this hand-writing on 
 the ivall ? If what we have said has any weight, the answer 
 will be the Earl of Chatham, and he alone. What other 
 man had his provocations ? Moreover, who, beside him, had 
 the knowledge discoverable in these Letters ? Who had the 
 honor and glory of Old England more at heart ? And, which 
 is not the weakest argument, who had that Demosthenical elo- 
 quence for exposing all these things, so glowing in the pages 
 of Junius, but he who transcended all others for that " supe- 
 rior genius which animates and directs him to eloquence in de- 
 bate, and wisdom in decision." 
 
 What then must the man in the visor do, if he really be 
 Chatham himself? He must commence his operations by 
 warding off a blow, which might be destructive to his whole 
 plan in all its ramifications. No means to accomplish this end 
 could be more effectual, than severity of remark upon himself, 
 even to abuse, and upon his dear friend, Lord Camden. Ac- 
 cordingly, to the high-minded Lord Chatham, and to that pil- 
 lar of the constitution, Earl Camden, Junius attributes, in the 
 words already cited, a spirit of vulgar and mean opposition, 
 bent, wickedly bent, on the ruin of a minister, though it should 
 cost half of an empire ! What a diabolical spirit must have
 
 206 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 entered the hearts of those eminent men, were the accusation 
 true ! We shall prove hereafter, that Junius himself did not 
 believe it. 
 
 After this, what reader, but of the most scrutinizing class, 
 would even suspect, that this foul accuser, Junius, and Lord 
 Chatham, were one and the same person. Bear in mind, 
 reader, that his settled purpose was to deceive the multitude 
 as it regarded himself ; and to the multitude, without distinc- 
 tion of rank and condition, did he write, and in a style the 
 most studied and peculiar. The deep deception marked the 
 master spirit, and its efficacy was complete. 
 
 If we examine the deep reproach itself, which is indeed con- 
 tumelious, could the accusation have been sincere ? Certainly 
 not. Junius well knew that odium could not attach itself to 
 either of those illustrious Peers. Did the opposition of Lord 
 Chatham and of Lord Camden to the measure of Mr. Gren- 
 ville " in effect divide one half of the empire from the other " ? 
 Junius knew better. We, Americans, know better, and ab- 
 solve them from the charge, and Junius from the folly of be- 
 lieving it. 
 
 It is also worthy of remark, that Junius denounces the con- 
 duct of Chatham and Camden, while he himself scarcely wrote 
 a sentence that was not pregnant with the same spirit which, 
 at that time, pervaded the speeches of those two venerable 
 Statesmen. His invective could not have been sincere, since 
 the abuse is equally applicable to himself; nay, it is at perfect 
 variance with the high, the very high applause which he be- 
 stows on both of them ; on Lord Chatham in his Fifty-fourth 
 Letter, and upon Lord Camden, in his solemn, valedictory ad- 
 dress, when he appears to drop his mantle on him, enjoining 
 him to sacrifice, in the Temple of Justice, the victim, Mans- 
 field, whom he had dragged bound to her altar. 
 
 It is furthermore remarkable, how cautiously Junius pre- 
 pares his reader to receive gradually his' high eulogy of Lord 
 Chatham, by saying, in the same letter, — " It is not in the lit- 
 tle censure of Mr. Home, to deter me from doing signal jus-
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 207 
 
 tice to a man who, / confess, has grown upon my esteem." 
 Can any one conceive that a character like that of Pitt, Earl of 
 Chatham, renowned to celebrity, famous through the reign of 
 George the Second, and firmly established throughout the civil- 
 ized world before Junius began to write, could grow so fast in 
 his esteem, as that, within the short space of two years, from 
 being the wretch, — yes, the wretch, who could divide one half 
 of the empire from the other merely to ruin a minister, should 
 deserve, — we use the very words of Junius, — that " recorded 
 honors should gather round his monument and thicken over 
 him " ; furthermore, that these praises he bestowed upon him 
 " would wear well, for they had been dearly earned." 
 
 We intreat the reader to ponder these things. 
 
 We shall treat this high but singular panegyric, professedly 
 in its proper place, and only observe, in passing, that Junius 
 says in the Fifty-fourth Letter, just cited, " I am willing enough 
 to suppose, that, in public affairs, it would be impossible to de- 
 sert or betray Lord Chatham without doing an essential injury 
 to this country." And he speaks of Saville, Richmond, Cam- 
 den and Chatham, as fathers of their church and objects of 
 political worship. Weighing and considering these things, can 
 we believe, that the denunciatory passage, cited from the first 
 Letter of Junius, had its foundation in truth and sincerity ? 
 Or was it throwing sand in the eyes of the pursuer ? 
 
 Nor is it altogether unworthy of notice, that, in the same 
 very weighty paragraph, the able writer glances at " Britain's 
 former successes" which he could not but know were attrib- 
 utable to the glorious administration of the very man who was 
 mean enough, base enough, to risk the integrity of the em- 
 pire, if he could but pull down a minister, and that minisier, 
 the Right Hon. George Gromille, the brother-in-law of Lord 
 Chatham. 
 
 Junius has been studied like an academic model, from va- 
 rious points of view, but not from every point. We, at this 
 distance, may view him from a point in the circle of artists, but 
 slightly attended to in Britain, if not wholly neglected. To
 
 208 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 my own eye it appears, that, if insincerity was ever made out 
 against any man, we have demonstrated this accusation against 
 Lords Chatham and Camden to be insincere. We view it as 
 one of those blinds or lures, practised by Junius, to divert 
 attention from his person at his first setting out. 
 
 Having surmounted one difficulty, we are met by another, 
 yet are we not discouraged ; and though we may not remove 
 it, we will try, encouraged with the hope of coming to level 
 ground again. 
 
 The Right Hon. George Grenville had quoted a passage 
 from Blackstone's Commentaries, which directly contradict- 
 ed the doctrine maintained by that celebrated lawyer in the 
 House of Commons. Sir William Blackstone was, at that 
 time, solicitor-general to the Queen. He was touched so- 
 painfully by the incident, that he wrote a pamphlet in defence 
 of his reputation in the " insipid form of a third person," which 
 occasioned Junius to address him. And he says to him,, 
 " Your pamphlet then is divided into an attack on Mr. Gren- 
 ville's character, and a defence of your own. It is not my 
 design to enter into a formal vindication of Mr. Grenville upon 
 his own principles. / have neither the honor of being person- 
 ally known to him, nor do I pretend to be completely master of 
 the facts." 
 
 The rest of the letter is principally employed in vindicating 
 Mr. Grenville's character and conduct against the attack of 
 Blackstone, and in clearing it from every stain of blame, but is 
 little connected with our present object, except as it leads us to 
 remark the friendly solicitude of Junius for the honor of that 
 indefatigable minister and worthy man ; * and to notice a short 
 
 * " Mr. Grenville was, above all men, the declared favorite of Junius. 
 He never censured him, but embraced every occasion of defending and 
 extolling his conduct and principles, and therefore must have known 
 him." — From a pleasant work by E. H. Barker, Esq. that has just come 
 to my hands. The Rev. Mr. Thackeray says, of all the members of 
 the Grenville family, Mr. Pitt ever distinguished the elder brother by
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 209 
 
 passage, viz. — " You are a lawyer, Sir, and know better than 
 I do, upon what particular occasions a talent for misrepresenta- 
 tion may he fairly exerted." 
 
 Is it probable, is it credible, that Junius, conversant, be- 
 yond all doubt, in courts, cabinets, palaces, and parliaments, 
 acquainted with offices in every department of government, 
 could be unknowing of, and unknown to, the Right. Hon. George 
 Grenville, who, in Junius's day, had been Prime Minister, and, 
 for a long time, a leader in the House of Commons. Our 
 author, a master-spirit, who appears to know every body else 
 of distinction, pretends that he and Mr. Grenville are unknown 
 to each other ! Speaking severely of the Duke of Grafton, he 
 says, " My abhorrence of the Duke arises from an intimate 
 knowledge of his character." He knew, it seems, minutely, 
 the character of Mr. Wilkes, and Sawbridge, and all the Dii 
 minorum gentium, as well as the majorum, and of him, who is 
 too exalted to be cited, — and yet had no acquaintance with a 
 man, who occupied so large a space in his own and in the pub- 
 lic estimation ; a gentleman, whose name and political charac- 
 ter, as the reputed father of the American stamp-act, is well 
 known in this country. 
 
 Now, if Junius and Chatham were one and the same per- 
 son, we perceive at once the delicacy of acknowledging ac- 
 quaintance with Mr. Grenville and his brother Lord Temple, 
 the latter of whom, though a noble whig and of great influ- 
 ence, is never once mentioned by Junius. Mr. Grenville's 
 subserviency 10 the sovereign's strong wishes respecting an 
 American revenue, and particularly the stamp-act, needed ex- 
 planation, palliation, and extenuation, to the people of both 
 hemispheres ; and Junius did not neglect it. He speaks, in his 
 Fifteenth Letter, of " the shrewd, inflexible judgment of Mr. 
 Grenville, and the mild, but determined integrity of Lord 
 Rockingham." And in a note to the younger Woodfall's 
 
 the most cordial attachment ; but he was inferior to his brother George, 
 both in judgment and amplication. 
 
 27
 
 210 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 edition, the editor remarks, that — " The warm attachment of 
 Junius to every part of the conduct of this distinguished 
 Statesman [George Grenville], may, perhaps, import some- 
 thing more than a mere political concurrence of sentiment, and 
 indicate an ardent personal friendship ." 
 
 Taking it for granted, and I cannot believe otherwise, that 
 the author of the Letters in question was known to Mr. Gren- 
 ville, let us see if we can possibly clear him from the impu- 
 tation of uttering. a deliberate falsehood with intent to deceive. 
 He might whisper to his conscience, that he meant, ' not 
 known to Mr. Grenville as Junius ' ; implying his, Mr. Gren- 
 ville's, not partaking the secret. We go one step farther, and 
 crave permission, in this difficulty, to recur to the primitive 
 meaning of the words person and personally ; for in this the 
 stress lies ; — a word that will bear the strain of interpreting it 
 to denote the assumed character, and not the proper person,. 
 — the visor or mask, under which Junius might allow him- 
 self to say, ' I have not the honor of being personally known 
 to him in my visor and complete armour, with only this in- 
 scription on my shield, Stat nominis umbra.'' May it not bear 
 this fair construction ? ' I, being personatus, that is, disguised 
 in my helmet, like an ancient knight, engaged in redressing 
 wrongs, have not, in consequence of it, the honor of being 
 known to him, although he is very well known to me.' Some 
 may think, that this is picking the strands of a Jesuitical 
 rope to its primitive oakum ; yet if there be any thing respect- 
 able in this argument, — if it be not absolutely trifling, then it 
 will follow, that there is not a positive denial, but an equivoque 
 subservient to his plan, and rendered necessary to the vital 
 secret, on which depended more than the writer's life. I have 
 a right to consider this equivoque a device subordinate to his 
 plan, because Junius is remarkable for planning. In a private 
 letter Mr. Wilkes complained piteously of his too severe cas- 
 tigation of him in the year 1769 ; when he said soothingly to 
 him, — " Think no more of what is past. You did not then 
 stand so well in my opinion ; and it was necessary to the plan
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 211 
 
 of that letter to rate you lower than you deserved " ; that is, 
 variant from the truth. 
 
 In trying to remove this second difficulty we would remark, 
 that few people consider the power of internal evidence. 
 The multitude look for the highest degree of proof, for ab- 
 solute certainty, in such a world as this. There is in nature a 
 strong evidence of things not seen. But I cannot do better, 
 in illustrating this subject, than use the words of Junius himself. 
 
 " I still maintain, that the conduct of this minister carries 
 with it an internal and convincing evidence against him. Sir 
 William Draper seems not to know the value or force of such 
 a proof. He will not permit us to judge of the motives of 
 men by the manifest tendency of their actions, nor by the no- 
 torious character of their minds. He calls for papers and 
 witnesses with a triumphant security, as if nothing could be 
 true, but what could be proved in a court of justice. Yet a 
 religious man might have remembered upon what foundation 
 some truths, most interesting to mankind, have been received 
 and established. If it were not for the internal evidence 
 which the purest of religions carries with it, what would have 
 become of his once well-quoted decalogue, and of the meek- 
 ness of his Christianity." * 
 
 We would apply this exposition of the force of internal evi- 
 dence to what we have already said, and may yet say, in the 
 course of our search after a powerful being who had deter- 
 mined on concealment ; and shall only remark here, that no 
 man in London, of general information on the subjects we have 
 discussed, could believe, that the writer of the Letters of Ju- 
 nius and Mr. George Grenville were unknown to each other in 
 the ordinary intercourse of persons of the same rank in socie- 
 ty with Junius. To the force of this kind of evidence we 
 confidently appeal. 
 
 There is yet a third difficulty, — another lure thrown out to 
 divert the keen pursuer after the person of Junius. I mean 
 
 * Letter xxvii.
 
 212 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the celebrated eulogy recorded in the Fifty-fourth Letter of 
 the collection. It was the first thing which impressed strongly 
 upon my mind, that Lord Chatham was in reality Junius him- 
 self, and that full fifty years ago. Increasing time has not di- 
 minished the idea, but strengthened it, like the bias of insanity. 
 
 The wise and wary Junius overshot himself, when he, 
 through misinformation or conjecture, accused the Rev. John 
 Home of treachery to his party. Home's misfortune was an 
 overweening self-sufficiency and a jealousy of his compatriots, 
 particularly of Wilkes, who, he thought, monopolized popu- 
 larity. It never appeared that Mr. Home contemplated to 
 desert to the enemy with his arms, as Junius seems to insinu- 
 ate ; but he was considered the Marplot of every party to 
 which he belonged, and Junius aimed to check and confound 
 him without offending his friends. Home's ready and correct 
 pen was valuable to the city patriots, who were more men of 
 business than of letters. He was very active in getting up and 
 maintaining the Society for the Support of the Bill of Rights ; 
 yet he divided and set at variance those members of it, who, 
 like himself, envied Wilkes his gainful patriotism. John Home 
 was a bustling, overbearing man, who deserted, in a great 
 measure, his clerical duties to scuffle with politicians, and he 
 suffered accordingly. This learned gentleman, since better 
 known by the agnomen of Tooke, beside constitutional intre- 
 pidity, had a clear and logical head, with no small portion of 
 " John-Battery " ; but no party had entire confidence in him. 
 That we may not be even suspected of uncharitableness to- 
 wards an eminent literary character, we shall exhibit his se 
 ipse pinxit picture. 
 
 In 1766, he writes from Montpelier to his friend John 
 Wilkes, Esq., at Paris, thus, — " You are now entering into a 
 correspondence with a parson, and I am greatly apprehensive, 
 lest that title should disgust ; but give me leave to assure you, 
 I am not ordained a hypocrite. It is true, I have suffered 
 the infectious hand of a bishop to be waved over me, whose 
 imposition, like the sop given to Judas, is only a signal for the
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 21 ^ 
 
 devil to enter." That he could put off the clergyman and 
 put it on again, alternately, with his clothes, in England and in 
 France, is evident by the following short letter to his friend 
 Wilkes, in 1767. 
 
 " Dear Sir, — According to your permission, I leave with 
 you one suit of scarlet and gold ; one suit of white and silver 
 cloth ; one suit of blue and silver camblet ; one suit of flow- 
 ered silk ; one suit of black silk ; one black velvet surtout. If 
 you have any fellow-feeling, you cannot but be kind to them ; 
 since they too, as well as yourself, are out-lawed in England, 
 and on the same account, — their superior worth. 
 
 I am he. he. JOHN HORNE." * 
 
 That the sagacity of Junius should induce him to suspect a 
 man of this sort is not to be wondered at. 
 
 Partial as we may be to the heroic Junius, we must never- 
 theless confess, that he ran upon a snag when he attacked 
 Home ; f who appears, in one instance, to have pierced the 
 
 * Home says to Junius, — " You brought a positive charge against 
 me of corruption. I denied the charge, and called for your proofs. 
 You replied with abuse, and re-asserted your charge. I called again 
 for proofs. You reply again with abuse only, and drop your accusa- 
 tion. In your fortnight's Letter there is not one word upon the sub- 
 ject of my corruption." 
 
 Junius was evidently mistaken. But what was the reply of the 
 rough, unpolished Home to Junius? — You told a deliberate lie. 
 
 This is the wound given to the ghost of a great man, which 
 afforded such supreme delight to all it had terrified ! 
 
 f In the Mississippi, the father of rivers and the Nile of America, 
 the never-ceasing current wears away its soft banks, and undermining 
 large trees, carries them down the stream, where they sometimes 
 gather in an everlasting tangle, laying the foundation of new islands ; 
 or else a tree sticks fast by its roots in the bottom of the river, and 
 whips one way and the other, according to the eddies, when it is called 
 a sawyer ; or else it gets a firm position by its roots against some oth- 
 er unseen body, with its limbs and largest branches opposed to the 
 current, forming a species of abatlis, with its sharp ends projecting un- 
 der water. These are called snags. Without experienced and adroit 
 pilots and great caution, boats are liable to run with force against 
 these subaquatic chevaux-de-frise, so as to pierce through their
 
 214 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 valorous knight between the joints of his harness, so that he 
 writhed under it, and wrote him a private letter, ungraciously 
 apologetical, containing somewhat of abuse, yet, however, a 
 permission to publish it if he thought it would benefit him. 
 Home, as if he saw a flash of immortality, gave it publicity, 
 accompanied with a well written, Jesuitical reply ; which de- 
 lighted the court, as evidence of divisions in the councils and 
 forces of the city-patriots. He reaped an abundant crop of 
 reputation from this rencontre, the more from the delight which 
 most people take in seeing a notorious satirist satirized. Still 
 he gives a token of the highest respect for the unknown writer, 
 by wishing this line of Junius for his epitaph, viz. " Home's 
 situation did not corresjjond with his intentions " ; although a 
 perversion of the writer's meaning. 
 Let us now turn to Lord Chatham. 
 
 Mr. Home's Letter of the thirty-first of July, 1771, con- 
 tained some passages that must have nettled, if not mortified 
 Lord Chatham, the more so as coming from a professed ad- 
 mirer. It places that great man in a somewhat humiliating 
 situation before the public. He says of him, — " When Lord 
 Chatham can forgive the awkward situation, in which, for the 
 sake of the public, he was designedly placed by the thanks to 
 him from the city," &c. Again, — " Because Lord Chatham 
 has been ill treated by the King, and treacherously betrayed 
 by the Duke of Grafton, the latter is to be the pillow on 
 which Junius will rest his resentment." Here Mr. Home in- 
 cidentally notices the sympathy between Lord Chatham and 
 the man in the mask, and proceeds thus, — " I understand the 
 two great leaders of opposition to be Lord Rockingham and 
 
 planks, when they are either held fast, or sink at once. Rapid 
 steam-boats have, now and then, been sunk, before the baggage of 
 the passengers could be removed. Sometimes, as it was with Junius, 
 the damage is not so serious ; but enough to inspire the navigator with 
 more caution in his steerage, and a sharper look-out, under water as 
 well as above it. Whether, in his attack upon Home Tooke, he did 
 not run foid of a Snag is left to the judgment of the reader.
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 215 
 
 Lord Chatham ; under one of whose banners, all the opposing 
 members of both Houses, who desire to get places, enlist. 
 I can place no confidence in either of them." — " The mo- 
 tive, which dictated the thanks of the city to Lord Chatham, 
 was for his declaration in favor of short Parliaments, in order 
 thereby to fix Lord Chatham, at least, to that one constitution- 
 al remedy, without which all others can afford no security. 
 The embarrassment, no doubt, was cruel. He had his choice, 
 either to offend the Rockingham party, who declared formally 
 against short Parliaments, and with the assistance of whose 
 numbers in both Houses he must expect again to be minister ; 
 or to give up the confidence of the public, from whom finally 
 all real consequence must proceed. Lord Chatham chose the 
 latter ; and I will venture to say, that, by his answer to those 
 thanks, he has given up the people, without gaining the friend- 
 ship or cordial assistance of the Rockingham faction." This 
 language from Mr. Home must have nettled Lord Chatham, 
 inasmuch as it was a narrative of facts malignantly represented. 
 
 It may be needful to say to the American reader, that the 
 city-of-London Patriots, mere mercantile politicians, required 
 of the lofty and high-minded Earl of Chatham, a hand-and- 
 seal promise to a specific plan of reform, like the instructions 
 of some of our towns to their members of Congress, should he, 
 by their influence, return again to the high office of Prime 
 Minister. It related to the question of short and long Parlia- 
 ments. On Lord Chatham's declining this counting-house 
 negotiation, Mr. Home accuses him, tauntingly, of evasion, 
 and abandonment of his principles, and attempts to hold him 
 up in a point of view bordering on derision. 
 
 We notice the circumstance, to show the extreme solicitude 
 of Junius on the occasion. The public waited, with impa- 
 tience, for his reply, which appeared in a fortnight after, in 
 which he said, — " I understand that the public are not satis- 
 fied with my silence ; and that, if I persist in refusing to plead, 
 it will be taken for conviction."
 
 216 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 It is, on the whole, a curious Letter, and not free from 
 symptoms of soreness, anxiety, and embarrassment. He says, 
 whiningly, — " Is there no merit in dedicating my life to the 
 information of my fellow-subjects ? What public question have 
 I declined, what villain have I spared ? Is there no labor in 
 the composition of these letters? " 
 
 The uneasiness of Junius, at that time, is perceptible 
 throughout his Letter [LIV. addressed to the Printer of the 
 Public Advertiser, August 15, 1771], and makes it worthy of 
 particular notice. He says in it, — " It seems I am. a partisan 
 of the great leader of the opposition. If the charge had been 
 a reproach, it should have been better supported. I did not 
 intend to make a public declaration of the respect I bear Lord 
 Chatham. I well knew what unworthy conclusions would be 
 drawn from it. But I am called upon to deliver my opinion ; 
 and surely it is not in the little censure of Mr. Home to deter 
 me from doing signal justice to a man, who, I confess, has 
 grown upon my esteem. As for the common, sordid views of 
 avarice, or any purpose of vulgar ambition, I question whether 
 the applause of Junius would be of service to Lord Chatham.. 
 My vote will hardly recommend him to an increase of his pension, 
 or to a seat in the cabinet. But if his ambition be upon a 
 level with his understanding ; if he judges of what is truly 
 honorable for himself, with the same superior genius which ani- 
 mates and directs him to eloquence in debate, to ivisdom in 
 decision, even the pen of Junius shall contribute to reward 
 him. Recorded honors shall gather round his monument, and 
 thicken over him. It is a solid fabric, and will support the 
 laurels that adorn it. I am not conversant in the language of 
 panegyric. These praises are extorted from me; but they will 
 wear well, for they have been dearly earned.'''' 
 
 This is a very singular production from beginning to end. 
 Its singularity or circumstantiality is such, that scarcely two 
 readers put exactly the same construction on it. Mr. Heron, 
 one of the commentators on Junius, remarks, that his author 
 " suffered himself here to be betrayed into the burlesque, in
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 217 
 
 talking of laurels, even in figure, as if there were danger that 
 the weight of then might crush a funeral monument ; and that 
 the praise was artfully contrived to show, that Junius was not 
 Lord Chatham's creature.'''' Mr. Wilkes received several very 
 interesting private letters from the unknown Junius. He and 
 his friend, the Reminiscent Butler, amused themselves a con- 
 siderable time in trying to find out the author. Together they 
 reviewed, considered, and pondered the famous Letters with 
 great attention, sifting the anecdotes, weighing all the opinions, 
 and comparing the various conjectures ; and finished in despair. 
 When they came to this high-wrought panegyric on Lord 
 Chatham, they concluded it to be ironical. Nor do I much 
 wonder at their perplexity. Let any one try, as I have 
 done, to translate it into Latin or French, and its oddness will 
 induce him to think, that it is somewhat like a finely polished 
 knot of some very hard cabinet-wood, in which the beauty con- 
 sists in its gnarly intricacy, and the cross-grained entanglement 
 of its fibres, defying anatomy, yet altogether beautiful. Let 
 others try their hand at it, and speak the result. To my 
 own mind it looks as if it had been, at first, a lengthy eu- 
 logy, of which three fourths have been erased, leaving a mere 
 fragment of the original structure. This extorted praise appears 
 to me, not so much the sentiment of an observer, as the awk- 
 ward and embarrassed production of a conscious autographist, 
 hesitating under misgivings at every stroke of his pen. It ap- 
 pears, moreover, to me, that it was drawn out of Lord Chat- 
 ham, by Home Tooke's ungracious letter, placing his Lord- 
 ship in a painfully awkward position ; and that this strange enco- 
 mium helped him to change his uneasy posture. Beside, the 
 passage here commented on seems not a free and easy pro- 
 duction. Junius appears to go out of his way to lug in his 
 esteemed nobleman ; not to abuse him, as in his first Letter, 
 but to heap upon him a load of panegyric in one point of view, 
 and clumsy, niggardly praise in another. He adds, what had 
 better been left out, that this well-earned praise, and these 
 dear-bought recorded honors, are extorted from him. 
 
 28
 
 2 I 8 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 May I repeat it, that this delusive eulogy was among the 
 first, the very first passages in the Letters, which roused my 
 suspicion, that Junius was in fact Lord Chatham, nor have the 
 revolving years of half a century diminished the early im- 
 pression. So far from it, — crescit eundo. 
 
 That the great Earl of Chatham should bestow praises upon 
 himself, anonymously, is a small obstacle in our way. The 
 great Roman orator and patriot praised himself without any 
 hesitation. Other great men have resorted to self-commenda- 
 tion, when forced to reply and defend themselves against dan- 
 gerous enemies. St. Paul did it without scruple ; and Junius 
 confessedly availed himself of this license, when, under the 
 signature of Philo-Junius, he magnifies himself, and smooths 
 it over in the preface to his own edition of the Letters, in these 
 words, — " But the subordinate character is never guilty of the 
 indecorum of praising his principal. The fraud was innocent, 
 and I always intended to explain it." 
 
 If the language of Junius, in the passage cited, go beyond 
 what Chatham could, with real modesty, have uttered of him- 
 self in public, I see little or nothing in those laudatory ex- 
 pressions, which consciousness of desert, in a mind equally 
 above vanity and hypocrisy, in the need of defence, might 
 not have forced him to write under the shadow of a name. 
 
 Lord Chatham, like Cicero, knew his own character in the 
 opinion of the world ; and he, as Junius, had only to give a 
 chaste sketch of it. Junius says, in his Fifteenth Letter, — 
 " The advice of the ablest men in the country has been re- 
 peatedly called for and rejected ; and when the royal dis- 
 pleasure has been signified to a minister, the marks of it have 
 usually been proportioned to his abilities and integrity," — writ- 
 ten doubtless to make the reader think of Lord Chatham with- 
 out naming him, as any other writer naturally would have done. 
 What smoothness and delicacy shine forth, now and then, amid 
 the acute angles of satirical resentment !
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 219 
 
 A writer in the Edinburgh Review for June, 1 826, Article 
 Icon Basilike, says, that " a simple test ascertains the politi- 
 cal connexion of Junius, the only circumstance which he 
 could not disguise, because it could not be concealed without 
 defeating his general purpose ; that he supported the cause of 
 authority against America with Mr. Grenville, the minister 
 who passed the stamp-act ; and that he maintained the high- 
 est popular principles on the Middlesex election with the same 
 statesman, who was the leader of opposition on that question ; 
 that no other party in the kingdom, but the Grenvilles', com- 
 bined these two opinions." And he adds, — " Whoever re- 
 vives the inquiry, respecting the authorship of Junius, should 
 show him to be politically attached to the Grenville party, 
 which Junius certainly was." 
 
 On this presumed agreement we differ widely from the re- 
 viewer. The doctrine of the authority of the British Parlia- 
 ment over America was generally popular throughout England 
 at the commencement of the dispute ; and even with a great 
 many at the beginning of the war. But we deny that Junius 
 was an advocate for the unqualified authority of the Parliament 
 over the colonies. In his first and justly celebrated Letter, 
 January 21, 1769, after speaking honorably of Mr. Grenville 
 at the beginning of it, he adds, before the close, these rather 
 taunting expressions, — " Under one administration the stamp- 
 act is made ; under the second it is repealed ; under the third, 
 in spite of all experience, a new mode of taxing the colonies 
 is invented, and a question revived which ought to have been 
 buried in oblivion." Here Junius and Mr. George Grenville 
 by no means accord. He then mentions the appointment of 
 the Earl of Hillsborough to the new office of Secretary of the 
 Colonies, and adds, — " As for his measures, let it be remem- 
 bered that he was called upon to conciliate and unite ; and 
 that, when he entered into office, the colonies were still dis- 
 posed to proceed by the constitutional methods of petition and 
 remonstrance. Since that period, they have been driven into 
 excesses little short of rebellion. Petitions have been hin-
 
 220 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 dered from reaching the throne ; and the continuance of one 
 of the principal Assemblies [that of Massachusetts] rested up- 
 on an arbitrary condition," — that they should retract one of their 
 resolutions, and erase the entry of it, — " which, considering the 
 temper they were in, it was impossible they should comply 
 with. So violent, and, I believe I may call it, so unconstitu- 
 tional an exertion of the prerogative, gives us as humble an 
 opinion of his Lordship's capacity, as it does of his temper and 
 moderation. While we are at peace with other nations, our 
 military force may perhaps be spared to support the Earl of 
 Hillsborough's measures in America. Whenever that force 
 shall be necessarily withdrawn or diminished, the dismission 
 of such a minister will neither console us for his impru- 
 dence, nor remove the settled resentment of a people, who, 
 complaining of an act of the legislature, are outraged * by 
 an unwarrantable stretch of prerogative, and, supporting their 
 claims by argument, are insulted with declamation." Does 
 this look like advocating the authority of Britain over Ameri- 
 ca in any other than the qualified sense always maintained 
 by Lord Chatham ? and never qualified by Mr. Grenville. 
 The two most efficient men of the Grenville family were 
 Richard Lord Temple, and his next younger brother, George, 
 whom we have just mentioned, and who was the supposed 
 father of our stamp-act. That Junius was in accordance 
 with Lord Temple is pretty clear ; indeed the entire stream 
 of his opinions runs that way ; but Junius and George 
 Grenville never pushed or pulled together in politics, except 
 in the cause of the Middlesex election. Nevertheless Junius 
 discovers a marked partiality or predilection for Mr. Grenville 
 as a man. 
 
 I am ready to maintain, that Junius was not a strenuous ad- 
 vocate for the authority of the British Parliament over Ameri- 
 ca, in the same sense as over the people of England. I repeat 
 
 * Outrage, — to injure violently or contumeliously ; to insult roughly; 
 to commit exorbitances. — Johnson. Of all writers Junius is the most 
 remarkable for the nice selection of his terms.
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 221 
 
 it, — it was not a part of the plan of our author to discuss the 
 great American question. He ever touches it cautiously, and 
 always incidentally. He appears to dread lest violent measures 
 should create combinations of resistance in America, that might 
 probably end in her separation from the mother country. He 
 speaks of the doctrine of taxation as a matter beyond the clear 
 comprehension of the people at large ; and out of tenderness 
 to Mr. Grenville, gives it the name of contribution. In an in- 
 teresting private letter to Mr. Wilkes,* he says, " If you (the 
 supporters of the Bill of Rights) propose, that, in the article 
 of taxation, they [the Americans] should be hereafter left to 
 the authority of their respective assemblies, I must own, that 
 I think you had no business to revive a question which should, 
 and probably would, have lain dormant for ever." Does this 
 look like urging or favoring the cause of the Parliament, to 
 raise a revenue in America by taxing them without their con- 
 sent? 
 
 But to come to the point at once. Junius was infested by 
 a swarm of anonymous writers, amongst whom Mr. Home was 
 suspected ; and was urged and goaded to speak out his senti- 
 ments respecting the right of taxation over the Americans ; the 
 impressing of seamen ; and the game laws ; three cunningly de- 
 vised snares. In November 2, 1771, the following article ap- 
 peared in Woodfall's Public Advertiser. 
 
 " We are desired to make the following declaration, in be- 
 half of Junius, upon three material points, on which his opin- 
 ion has been mistaken or misrepresented. 
 
 " Junius considers the right of taxing the colonies by an 
 act of the British legislature, as a speculative right merely, 
 never to be exerted, nor ever to be renounced.''' 1 To his judg- 
 ment it appears plain, ' That the general reasonings, which 
 were employed against that power, went directly to our whole 
 legislative right ; and that one part of it could not be yielded 
 to such arguments without a virtual surrender of all the rest.' " 
 
 * No. lxvi. — The younger Woodfall's edition.
 
 222 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 The first clause is plain enough. It contains his own senti- 
 ments. The latter is the general reasonings of others, and sa- 
 vours of the lawyer, where the cuttlefish obscures the sight of 
 his pursuers by his effusion of ink. Now, a right never to be 
 insisted on, must be, in the opinion of every man of business, 
 a right abandoned. The two theories may not be absolutely 
 the same ; but, at most, there is here but a shadow of differ- 
 ence in opinion between himself and Lord Chatham. A shade, 
 if not more, might be deemed necessary to keep up the vital 
 deception respecting the person of Junius. In a private letter 
 to Mr. Wilkes, September 7, 1771, where he comments on 
 the resolves of the supporters of the Bill of Rights, he says to 
 him, — " Since the repeal of the stamp-act, 1 know of no act 
 tending to tax the Americans, except that which creates the 
 tea duty ; and even that can hardly be called internal. Yet it 
 ought to be repealed, as an impolitic act, not as an oppressive 
 one. It preserves the contention between the mother country 
 and the colonies, when every thing worth contending for is 
 given up. 
 
 " When this act is repealed, I presume you will turn your 
 thoughts to the postage of letters ; a tax imposed by the au- 
 thority of Parliament, and levied in the very heart of the colo- 
 nies." This is saying, in pretty plain terms, — Advise the 
 Americans to resist also the operation of our post-office act, as 
 it regards their country.* The writer in the Edinburgh Re- 
 view could, therefore, hardly have read Junius with due atten- 
 tion, when he asserted that he supported the cause of authority 
 against America with Mr. Grenville. We assert, and shall 
 prove hereafter, that Lord Chatham and Junius thought alike 
 
 *The Americans never viewed the postage of letters in the light of 
 a tax. It was a quid pro quo, — a service rendered ; a price paid for a 
 certain convenience. There was no compulsion. A man might take 
 his letter from the post-office or let it alone, send it hy his own ser- 
 vant, or by the hand of a friend. They never refused to pay custom- 
 house duties, nor ever objected to the British regulations of trade for 
 the general benefit of the whole empire.
 
 DIFFICULTIES CONSIDERED. 223 
 
 on the exercise of authority against the colonies. Junius never 
 speaks contemptuously of the Americans, but the reverse ; for 
 example, — " Neither the general situation of our colonies, nor 
 that particular distress, which forced the inhabitants of Boston 
 to take up arms in their defence." — What that particular dis- 
 tress was, may be learnt from the speech of Lord Chatham urg- 
 ing the removal of the British troops from the town, (page 225.) 
 Again, ' : The spirit of the Americans may be an useful exam- 
 ple to us." — " A series of inconsistent measures has alienated 
 the colonies from their duty as subjects, and from their natural 
 affection to their common country." And in his famous Letter 
 to the King. — " They [the Americans] left their native land in 
 search of freedom, and found it in a desert. Divided as they 
 are into a thousand forms of policy and religion, there is one 
 point in which they all agree ; they equally detest the pa- 
 geantry of a king, and the supercilious hypocrisy of a bishop. 
 It is not then from the alienated affections of Ireland or Ameri- 
 ca, that you can reasonably look for assistance." 
 
 Having shown the inclination of Junius (for we must again 
 remind the reader, that he touches incidentally only the great 
 American question), it is proper that we should exhibit the 
 positive opinion of Lord Chatham in regard to taxing America. 
 He had said in the House of Lords, to the surprise of super- 
 ficial thinkers, " I rejoice that America has resisted " ; 
 and his reason for it was this : Lord North, weary, probably, 
 with applications and expostulations, was known to have said, 
 that " It was to no purpose making objections, for the King 
 would have it so " ; and added, " that the King meant to 
 try the question with America, and Boston was fixed upon 
 as the proper place for it ; and thus a civil war was raised 
 against a country of whigs, to try that dangerous question." 
 The first step was to fill it with troops ; and on the twenty- 
 seventh of May, 1774, Lord Chatham attended the House of 
 Peers on the third reading of a bill for quartering soldiers in 
 America.
 
 224 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 His re-appearance, after a long absence from Parliament, 
 was an epoch in its history, on which occasion he said, — " If 
 we take a transient view of those motives which induced the 
 ancestors of our fellow-subjects in America to leave their na- 
 tive country, to encounter the innumerable difficulties of the 
 unexplored regions of the western world, our astonishment at 
 the present conduct of their descendants will naturally sub- 
 side. There was. no corner of the world into which men 
 of their free and enterprising spirit would not fly with alacri- 
 ty, rather than submit to the slavish and tyrannical principles 
 which prevailed, at that period, in their native country. And 
 shall we wonder, if the descendants of such illustrious char- 
 acters spurn, with contempt, the hand of unconstitutional pow- 
 er, that would snatch from them such dear-bought privileges 
 as they now contend for? 
 
 " My Lords, this country is little obliged to the framers and 
 promoters of this tea tax. The Americans had almost forgot, 
 in their excess of gratitude for the repeal of the stamp-act, any 
 interest but that of the mother country. There seemed an 
 emulation among the different provinces, who should be most 
 dutiful and forward in their expressions of loyalty to their real 
 benefactor, as testified by a letter from Governor Bernard. 
 
 " This was the temper of the Americans, and would have 
 continued so, had it not been interrupted by your fruitless en- 
 deavours to tax them without their consent ." 
 
 In January, 1775, Lord Chatham appeared again in Parlia- 
 ment, when he powerfully urged the importance of immediate- 
 ly opening the way towards a happy settlement of the danger- 
 ous troubles in America. On which memorable occasion he said, 
 
 " My Lords ! These papers from America now laid, for the 
 first time, before you, have been, to my knowledge, five or 
 six weeks in the pocket of the ministry ; and, notwithstanding 
 the fate of this kingdom hangs upon the event of this great 
 controversy, we are but this moment called to a considera- 
 tion of this important subject. I do not wish to look into 
 one of those papers. I. know that there is not a member
 
 SPEECH OF LORD CHATHAM. 225 
 
 of this House but is acquainted with their purport. There 
 ought, therefore, to be no delay in entering upon this matter. 
 We ought to seize the first moment to open the door of recon- 
 ciliation. The Americans will never be in a temper or state 
 to be reconciled, and they ought not to be, till the troops are 
 withdrawn. The troops are a perpetual irritation to these 
 people. I therefore move an humble address to be presented 
 to his Majesty, that orders may be despatched for removing his 
 Majesty's forces from the town of Boston, &ic. he. in the usual 
 parliamentary form of such bills. 
 
 " The way, my Lords, must be immediately opened for re- 
 conciliation. It will soon be too late. I know not who advised 
 the present measures. I know not who advises to a perse- 
 verance in them ; but this I will say, that whoever advises 
 them ought to answer for it at his utmost peril. I know that 
 no one will avow that he advised, or that he was the author 
 of these measures. Every one shrinks from the charge.* 
 Somebody has advised his Majesty to these measures ; and if 
 his Majesty continue to hear such evil counsellors, he will be 
 undone. His Majesty indeed may wear his crown, but, the 
 American jewel out of it, it will not be worth the wearing. 
 
 " What more shall I say ? I must not say that the King is 
 betrayed ; but this I will say, — the nation is ruined. 
 
 " What foundation have we for our claims over America ? 
 What is our right to persist in such cruel and vindictive meas- 
 ures against that loyal and respectable people. They say, 
 you have no right to tax them without their Consent. They 
 say truly. Representation and taxation must go together ; 
 yet there is hardly a man in our streets, though so poor as 
 scarcely able to get his bread, but thinks he is the legislator of 
 
 * Prophetical Chatham knew then, as we all have since, that the 
 coercion of* America was the King's own measure ; and her subjuga- 
 tion his darling object. The stamp-act was George the Third's favorite 
 scheme, and not Mr. Grenville's, — and next to that was Charles Tovvns- 
 hend's tea duty. 
 
 29
 
 226 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 America. ' Our American subjects' is a common phrase in 
 the months of the lowest order of our citizens. 
 
 " Property, my Lords, is the sole and entire dominion of 
 the owner. None can meddle with it. It is an unity, a 
 mathematical point, an atom untangible by any but the pro- 
 prietor. Touch it and you contaminate the whole mass. The 
 touch of another annihilates it ; for whatever is a man's own 
 is absolutely and exclusively his own. 
 
 " In the last Parliament all was anger, all rage. Adminis- 
 tration did not consider what was practicable, but what was re- 
 venge. " Sine clade victoria" was the language of the min- 
 istry ; but every body knew, — an idiot might have known, that 
 would not have been the issue. But the ruin of the nation 
 was a matter of no concern, provided administration might be 
 revenged. The Americans were abused, misrepresented, tra- 
 duced in the most atrocious manner, in order to give a color, 
 and urge on to the most precipitate, unjust, cruel, and vindic- 
 tive measures that ever disgraced a nation. 
 
 " Gnossius luec Rhadamanthus habet durissima regna ; 
 Castigatque, audiique doles." * 
 
 But how have these respectable people behaved under these 
 grievances ? With unexampled patience, with unparalleled wis- 
 dom. They chose delegates by their free suffrages ; — no 
 bribery, no corruption, no injluence here, my Lords ! Their 
 representatives meet, with the sentiments and the temper of 
 
 * It is worthy of remark, that Junius applies the same passage to 
 the same course of reasoning, in a note to a Letter to Lord Mansfield, 
 taken from Coke, 2 Tnst. 55, viz. " The philosophic poet doth notably 
 describe the damnable and damned proceedings of the judge of hell, 
 ' Gnossius luec Rhadamanthus habet durissima regna ; 
 Castigatque, audiique dolos, subigitque fateri.' " 
 First he punisheth, and then he heareth ; and, lastly, compelleth to 
 confess, and makes and mars laws at his pleasure ; like as the centu- 
 rion, in the holy history, did to St. Paul ; for the text saith, — ' Centime 
 apprehendi Paulum jussit, et se catenis eligari ; et tunc interrogabat, 
 quis fuisset, et quid fecisset.' But good judges and justices abhoj- 
 these courses."
 
 SPEECH OF LORD CHATHAM. 227 
 
 Aeir constituents, and speak the sense of the continent. For 
 genius, for sagacity, for singular moderation, for solid wisdom, 
 manly spirit, sublime sentiments, and simplicity of language, — 
 for every thing respectable and honorable, the Congress of 
 Philadelphia shine unrivalled. This wise people speak out. 
 They do not hold the language of slaves. They tell you what 
 they mean. They do not ask you to repeal your laws as a favor, 
 but claim it as a right. They demand it. They tell you they 
 will not submit to them; and I tell you the acts must be re- 
 pealed. You cannot enforce them. The ministry are check- 
 mated. They have a move to make on the board, and cannot 
 move without ruin. A bare repeal, my Lords, will not satisfy 
 this enlightened and spirited people. What ! repeal a bit of 
 paper ! a piece of parchment ! That alone will not do. You 
 must go farther. You must go through with it. You must 
 declare that you have no right to tax them ; and then they will 
 trust you ; then they will have confidence in you. 
 
 " A noble Lord seemed to lay some blame upon General 
 Gage. I think the general has behaved with great prudence 
 and becoming caution. He has entrenched himself, -and 
 strengthened his fortifications. I do not see what he could 
 do more. His situation reminds me of a similar transaction 
 in the civil wars of France, when the great Conde on one 
 side, and Marshal Turenne on the other, lay, with large ar- 
 mies, many weeks very near each other. Turenne, conscious 
 of the terrible consequences of a victory to himself and to his 
 country, though the armies were several days in sight of each 
 other, never came to battle. On his return to the court of 
 France, the Queen asked him, — ' Why, Marshal, as you lay 
 several days in sight of your enemy, why did you not take 
 him'? ' The general shrewdly replied, — ' Should 1 have taken 
 him, I was afraid all Paris would have taken me.' My Lords, 
 there are three millions of whigs. Three millions of whigs, 
 with arms in their hands, are a very formidable body. It was 
 the whigs, my Lords, who set his Majesty's royal ancestors 
 upon the throne of England. I hope there are yet double the
 
 228 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 number of wliigs in England that there are in America. I 
 hope the whigs of both countries will join and make common 
 cause. Ireland is with America to a man. The whigs in that 
 country ivill, and those of this country ought, to think the 
 American cause their own. They are allied to each other in 
 sentiment and interest ; united in one great principle of de- 
 fence and resistance. They ought therefore, and will, run to 
 embrace and support their brethren. 
 
 " The cause of ' ship-money ' was the cause of all the 
 whigs in England. ' You shall not take my money without 
 my consent,' is the doctrine and language of whigs. It is the 
 doctrine and language of whigs in America and whigs here. 
 It is the doctrine, in support of which, I do not know how 
 many names I could — I may call in this House. Among the 
 living I cannot say how many would join with me, and main- 
 tain these doctrines with their blood. But among the dead I 
 could raise an host innumerable. And, my Lords, at this day 
 there are very many sound, substantial, honest whigs, who 
 ought, and who will consider the American controversy as a 
 great common cause. 
 
 " Consistent with the preceding doctrines and with what I 
 have ever, and shall continue to maintain, I shall oppose Ameri- 
 ca, whenever I see her aiming at throwing off the navigation 
 act, and other regulatory acts of trade made bond fide for that 
 purpose, and wisely framed and calculated for reciprocation of 
 interest, and the general, extended welfare and security of the 
 whole empire. [Jfhat is the difference between these senti- 
 ments and those of Junius respecting the sovereignty of Great 
 Britain over the colonics^ I see none. .] It is suggested that 
 Independence is their design. I see no evidence of it. But 
 to come at a certain knowledge of their sentiments and de- 
 signs on this head, it would be proper first to do them justice, 
 before you Ireat them as aliens, rebels, and traitors." * 
 
 * Samuel Adams, who took the lead in Massachusetts, after the re- 
 tirement of James Otis, always contemplated Independence. He
 
 SPEECH CF LORD CHATHAM. 229 
 
 " Deeply impressed, my Lords, with the importance of taking 
 some healing measures at this most alarming, distracted state 
 of our affairs, though bowed down with a cruel disease, I have 
 crawled to this house to give you my best experience and coun- 
 sel ; and my advice is, to beseech his Majesty, that, in order 
 to open the way toward an happy settlement of the dangerous 
 troubles in America, by beginning to allay ferments and soften 
 animosities, and preventing any sudden and fatal catastrophe at 
 Boston, it may please his Majesty to send immediate orders to 
 General Gage for removing his Majesty's forces from the town 
 of Boston. [Here his Lordship repeated the motion at length.] 
 
 " This is the best I can think of. It will convince America, 
 that you mean to try her cause in the spirit and by the laws of 
 freedom and fair inquiry, and not by codes of blood. How 
 can she now trust you, with the bayonet at her breast ? She 
 has all the reason in the world, now, to believe you mean her 
 death or bondage. 
 
 " Thus entering on the threshold of this business, I will 
 knock at your gates for justice without ceasing, unless invete- 
 rate infirmities stay my hand. My Lords, I pledge myself 
 never to leave this business ; I will pursue it to the end in 
 every shape. I will never fail in my attendance on it, at every 
 step and period of this great matter, unless nailed down to my 
 bed by the severity of disease. There is no time to be lost j 
 every moment is big with danger. Nay, while I am speaking, 
 the decisive blow may have been struck, and millions involved 
 in the consequences. The very first drop of blood will make a 
 wound that will not easily be skinned over. Years, perhaps 
 ages, may not heal it. It will be an " irritabile vulnus" a 
 wound of that rancorous, malignant, corroding, festering na- 
 
 fixed his dauntless eye and incorruptible heart on that great object, 
 and conducted accordingly with consummate wisdom and address ; and 
 he was amply rewarded by seeing his country in full possession of it, 
 and in seeing his kindred co-patriot, John Adams, received by George 
 the Third as our first ambassador, and the same gentleman elevated 
 afterwards to the Presidency of these United States.
 
 230 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ttire, that, in all probability, it will mortify the whole body." 
 [This was not an oratorial exaggeration. Three months after 
 Lord Chatham uttered this solemn warning to King and Par- 
 liament, blood was drawn at Lexington, 12 miles from Boston, 
 and a few weeks afterwards, the sanguinary battle of Bunker 
 Hill was fought, within three miles of the table on which I am 
 now writing.*] 
 
 " Let us then, my Lords, set to this business in earnest, 
 not take it up by bits and scraps, as formerly, just as exigen- 
 cies pressed, without any regard to the general relations, con- 
 nexions, and dependencies. I could not, by any thing I have 
 said, my Lords, be thought to encourage America to proceed 
 beyond a right line. I reprobate all acts of violence by her 
 mobility ; but when her inherent constitutional rights are in- 
 vaded, — those rights which she has an equitable claim to 
 the full enjoyment of, by the fundamental laws of the Eng- 
 lish constitution, and engrafted thereon by the unalterable 
 laws of nature, then I own myself an American, and feel- 
 ing myself such, shall, to the verge of my life, vindicate 
 those rights against all men who strive to trample upon or 
 oppose them." 
 
 This speech amply evinced, that neither severe illness, in- 
 creased years, nor three years' retirement, had damped a spark 
 of his former fire. It blazed as ever in matchless eloquence. 
 Most men thought, Lord Chatham never shone in such over- 
 whelming force and splendor as on this great question, — the 
 union or division of a mighty empire, — peace or a civil war. 
 Dr. Franklin, who was in the House of Lords, said of it, 
 
 * Lord Mansfield used to observe, that nothing was more false than 
 modern history. We think so too, when we read such histories of the 
 American revolution and war as that by Stedman, and find him relied 
 on, as accurate, by writers of the character of Adolphus and Bisset, 
 who have mistakes enough without adopting his. Even the battle- 
 ground of Bunker hill is represented as a very steep hill ; whereas 
 every part of it can be ascended on a trot in a coach ; and a lady may 
 trot her horse over any part of it. Foreigners express surprise on 
 viewing the gentle slope.
 
 SPEECH OF LORD CAMDEN. 231 
 
 " that he had seen, in the course of life, sometimes eloquence 
 without wisdom, and often wisdom without eloquence, but in 
 this instance he saw both united, and both, as he thought, in 
 the highest degree possible." * There certainly are in it indica- 
 tions of deep anxiety, beyond the studied rules of oratory, — 
 a fearful apprehension, an ominous something, appalling one 
 of *tfe most courageous Peers, that perhaps ever raised his 
 voice in England, — a prospect of things, of acts, and conse- 
 quences, which the mind of the monarch seemed insensible to. 
 " While I am now speaking," said the prophetic statesman, 
 " the blow may be struck, and millions involved in the conse- 
 quences." Less than an hundred clays after this, blood was 
 drawn in this vicinity, and the jewel, which rendered the Brit- 
 ish crown worth wearing, was stricken from it by a species of 
 suicide ! and the consequences have been greater than any 
 king, conqueror, or individual reformer ever effected. 
 
 Lord Camden, the intimate and confidential friend of Lord 
 Chatham, spoke next on the side of America. On this memo- 
 rable occasion, he was said to equal Chatham in every thing but 
 fire, pathos, and a certain inimitable dignity of manner. In 
 knowledge of law no man in the realm surpassed him. We 
 dwell with great satisfaction on his weighty discourse, for his 
 authority in the great American question, and because Junius 
 esteemed Lord Camden the only man worthy to complete the 
 task he himself began ; for to this luminary of the law, and firm 
 friend of the constitution, he " turns with pleasure from that 
 barren waste in which no salutary plant takes root, no verdure 
 quickens, to a character fertile in every great and good qualifi- 
 cation." To this apparent friend and legal oracle, the great 
 unknown says, " I call you, in the name of the English na- 
 tion, to stand forth in defence of the laws of your country, and 
 to exert, in the cause of truth and justice, those great abili- 
 ties with which you were entrusted for the benefit ol man- 
 kind." — " When the contest turns upon the interpretation of 
 
 * Letter to Lord Stanhope.
 
 232 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the laws, you cannot, without a formal surrender of all your 
 reputation, yield the post of honor even to Lord Chatham. 
 Considering the situation and abilities of Lord Mansfield, I do 
 not scruple to affirm, with the most solemn appeal to God for 
 my sincerity, that, in my judgment, he is the very worst and 
 most dangerous man in the kingdom." 
 
 But to return to the speech of Lord Camden. After speak- 
 ing of the nature of property, the right of taxation, and its in- 
 separability from representation, his Lordship said, " I will 
 not enter into the large field of collateral reasoning, applicable 
 to the abstruse distinctions touching the omnipotence of Parlia- 
 ment. The declaratory law sealed my mouth. But this I 
 will say, not only as a statesman, politician, and philosopher, but 
 as a common lawyer, you have no right to tax America. 
 The natural rights of man and the immutable laws of nature 
 are all with that people. I have searched the matter ; I re- 
 peat it, my Lords, you have no right to tax America* 
 Much stress is laid on the supreme legislative authority of 
 Great Britain, and so far as the doctrine is directed to its pro- 
 per object, I accede to it. But it is equally true, according 
 to all approved writers on government, that no mWft, agreeably 
 to the principles of natural and civil liberty, can be divested of 
 any part of his property without his consent. Every thing 
 has been staked upon this single position, that acts of Parlia- 
 ment must be obeyed. But this general, unconditional, unlim- 
 ited assertion, I am far from thinking applicable to every pos- 
 sible case that may arise in the turn of times. For my part I 
 conceive, that a power resulting from trust, arbitrarily exer- 
 cised, may be lawfully resisted, whether the power is lodged 
 in a collective body, or in a single person ; in the few or the 
 many ; however modified makes no difference. Whenever 
 the trust is wrested to the injury of the people ; whenever 
 oppression begins, all is unlawful and unjust ; and resistance 
 of course becomes lawful and right. But some Lords tell us, 
 and that seriously, that administration must reduce the Ameri- 
 cans to obedience and submission ; that is, you must mako
 
 SPEECH OF LORD CAMDEN. 233 
 
 them absolute and infamous slaves, and then, — What? — we 
 will give them full liberty. Ah ! is this the nature of man ? 
 No ! no ! my Lords ! I would not trust myself, American as 
 I am in principle, in this situation. In that case, I do not 
 think that I should be for giving them liberty. No! if they 
 submitted to such unjust, such cruel, such degrading slavery, I 
 should think they were made for slaves, that their servility was 
 suited to their nature and genius. I should think they would 
 best serve this country as their slaves, that their servility would 
 be for the benefit of this country, and I should be for keep- 
 ing such Cappadocians in a state of servitude, such as was 
 suited to their constitution. 
 
 " Some Lords speak much against resistance to acts of Par- 
 liament. Kings, Lords, and Commons are fine sounding 
 names. But, my Lords, acts of Parliament have been resist- 
 ed in all ages. Kings, Lords, and Commons may become 
 tyrants as well as others. Tyranny in one or more is the 
 same. Somebody asked the great Mr. Selden * in what law- 
 book, in what records or archives of the state you might find 
 the law for resisting tyranny. ' I don't know,' said Selden, 
 * whether it would be worth your while to look deeply into 
 books upon this matter ; but I will tell you what is most cer- 
 tain, that it has always been the Custom of England, and the 
 Custom of England is the law of the land.'" Lord Camden 
 then referred to some writer who seemed to be present ; 
 doubtless Judge Blackstone, " who considers ' the Revolution ' 
 as the only precedent ; and that the various circumstances, 
 events, and incidents, which may justify resistance cannot be 
 defined ; but the people at large will judge of their welfare 
 and happiness, and act accordingly. The same writer says, 
 whenever a case exactly similar, in all its parts and circum- 
 stances, to ' the revolution,' when a case shall run upon all 
 fours like that, then the law seems to be settled, that resistance 
 is lawful. I do not pretend," says his Lordship, " to quote his 
 
 * Called by Grotius the glory of England. 
 30
 
 234 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 words ; I think his meaning is very much as I have stated it ; 
 but undoubtedly in many cases, in many respects, dissimilar, 
 but in equal degree tyrannical and oppressive, resistance may 
 be lawful ; and the people in all ages, countries, and climes, 
 have, at times, known these things; and they have, and they 
 will for ever act accordingly." 
 
 Junius hints at this custom, or law of the land, again and 
 again. There is no sudden thought, train of ideas, trait of 
 principle, chain of reasoning, nor any thing respecting Ameri- 
 ca or Britain, in the Letters of Junius, contradictory to, or in- 
 consistent with, the sentiments maintained by Lord Chatham 
 and by his intimate friend Lord Camden. They seem kin- 
 dred souls ; and I have long believed, that Earl Camden 
 knew the writer of Junius. Lord Camden said in the House 
 of Lords, " I accepted the great seals without conditions ; I 
 meant not therefore to be trammelled by his Majesty — I beg 
 pardon, — by his ministers ; but I have suffered myself to be 
 so too long. For some time I have beheld, with silent indig- 
 nation, the arbitrary measures of the minister. I have often 
 drooped and hung down my head in council, and disapproved, 
 by my looks, those steps which I knew my avowed opposition 
 could not prevent. I will do so no longer ; but openly and 
 boldly speak my sentiments." * — " The ministry, by their vio- 
 lent and tyrannical conduct, had alienated the minds of the 
 people from his Majesty's government, I had almost said, from 
 his person ; and in consequence a spirit of discontent had spread 
 into every corner of the kingdom, and was every day increas- 
 ing ; and if some methods are not devised to appease the 
 clamors so universally prevalent, I do not know but the peo- 
 ple, in despair, may become their own avengers, and take the 
 redress of grievances into their own hands." f 
 
 *Lord Eldon said, in the House of Peers, that "the author of 
 the Letters of Junius, if not himself a lawyer, must certainly have 
 written in concert with the ablest and best of lawyers." 
 
 f Adolphus's HiBtory of England. Vol. i. p. 371,
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 STRATAGEMS AND SUBTERFUGES OF POLITICIANS. JUNIUS S 
 CO-OPERATION WITH THE WHIG-PARTY. CHATHAM NEVER 
 COUNTENANCED AMERICAN INDEPENDENCY. THIS ALWAYS 
 MAINTAINED BY SAMUEL ADAMS IN MASSACHUSETTS, AND 
 BY STEPHEN HOPKINS IN RHODE ISLAND. SKETCH OF THE 
 CHARACTER OF SAMUEL ADAMS. INDEPENDENCY NEVER 
 LOST SIGHT OF IN MASSACHUSETTS. CONCEDED BY THE AU- 
 THOR CONFIRMED BY CHALMERS. MISCELLANEOUS OBSER- 
 VATIONS. 
 
 We have, in our two last Chapters, scrambled through a 
 rough and intricate passage, crowded with natural difficulties, 
 and some obstacles thrown purposely in the way of the travel- 
 ler, to confound his calculations, by turning a portion of plain 
 road into pathless confusion, where the mind, perplexed with 
 mazes, was at times bewildered, but not discouraged ; for 
 while earth confounded us, the sun in the firmament, source 
 of light and emblem of truth, was our guide and comfort. 
 
 Rigid moralists tell us, that a truly honest man dares no 
 more look an untruth than utter one. There is, be sure, a 
 lamentable difference between what ought to be and what is. 
 The closet philosopher and the secluded female may lay down 
 rules, and weep that so few are disposed to follow them. One 
 of them says, under the head of " Lies of Benevolence ," * 
 " My own opinion is, which I give with great humility, that 
 Truth is never to be violated, or withheld in order to deceive ; 
 but I know myself to be in such a painful minority on this 
 subject, that I almost doubt of the correctness of my own judg- 
 ment." It is a fact, that the sacred history, written for our 
 instruction, celebrates the names of very few persons of in- 
 violable truth and strict integrity. Modern history but echoes 
 the ancient on this sad subject. " The Icon Basilike" written 
 
 *Mrs. Opic.
 
 236 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 by Doctor Gauden, who was made a bishop for it, was 
 palmed on the public as the pious production of King Charles 
 the First, and is believed to be from the pen of that monarch, 
 by numbers in England and a few in America, at this day.* 
 
 Our own countryman, Franklin, practised a refined stroke 
 of deception to benefit his country, by imposing a newspaper, 
 printed in his own house in France, for one printed in Bos- 
 ton, which completely deceived the British Legation at Paris. 
 The anecdote is worth recording here. 
 
 While the Doctor was soliciting the government of France 
 to form an alliance offensive and defensive with the new States 
 of America, the English ambassador near that court sent a 
 genuine Boston newspaper to the French minister, containing 
 an account of the defeat of the Americans with great loss ; 
 which statement was authentic, and it retarded the negotiation. 
 Franklin, who, every body knows, was originally a printer, 
 thereupon set to work in his own house, where he always kept 
 a complete printing apparatus, and directly printed a counter- 
 feit Boston newspaper, containing advertisements, anecdotes, 
 speculations, and a little of every thing common to our public 
 prints in that day, together with an official account of a victory 
 gained over the British troops, with loss of their cannon, &c. 
 This was sent to the French minister, and he sent it to Lord 
 Stormont, the British ambassador, who was confounded by the 
 sight of it. Franklin took special care to represent the genu- 
 ine American newspaper to be one of the New York forgeries, 
 not then uncommon at the British head quarters, and that 
 which came through him the only true one. Who thought the 
 worse of the American minister for the deception ? So far 
 from being considered, what it really was, a deliberate lie, it 
 
 * Lord Clarendon knew, negatively, that Charles the First did not 
 write the Icon Basilike, and, positively, that Gauden, Bishop of Win- 
 chester did write it. See his Letter to Gauden, March 13, 1661 ; yet 
 he favored the deception by his silence. Johnson quotes, in .his Dic- 
 tionary, King Charles as the author, and Dr. Webster is perpetuating 
 the deception.
 
 STRATAGEMS OF POLITICIANS. 237 
 
 added to the renown of the philosopher and politician, proving 
 him to be a match for the diplomatists of the old world, and 
 qualified to negotiate with them. Even the modern Moses 
 acted deceptions in his military movements ; as at Cambridge, 
 when he drove General Howe out of Boston ; and deceived 
 Clinton before New York, precursory to his fatal blow against 
 Lord Cornwallis in Virginia. 
 
 After these examples, and many more that might be urged, 
 why should we lay any great stress upon the assertions of Ju- 
 nius, whenever they regard the vital secret of his personality ? 
 We mean not to justify falsification, or to countenance equivo- 
 cation or evasion, but only to show what has been practised by 
 eminent politicians in all countries and ages of the world, when 
 any great and very important public object was in hand. 
 Hitherto our own government has kept her white robes free 
 from every stain, as a government, whatever may have been 
 the wary and cunning conduct of individual agents and ser- 
 vants of it. We cannot, however, too often remind the reader 
 of the singularly perilous situation of Junius, cased up, face 
 and all, in complete armour. He says, in a private letter to 
 his printer, Woodfall, " I must be more cautious than ever. — 
 I am sure I should not survive discovery three days ; or if I 
 should, they would attaint me by bill." In a letter to Mr. 
 Wilkes, in September, 1771, he says, " I willingly accept as 
 much of your friendship as you can impart to a man whom you 
 will assuredly never know. Beside personal consideration, if 
 I were known, I could no longer be an useful servant to the 
 public." — " I speak from a recess which no human curiosity 
 can penetrate." He really presents a singular phenomenon in 
 history. 
 
 " One of the greatest difficulties, in fixing upon any one per- 
 son the character of Junius, is," says the Reminiscent Butler, 
 " to find one, who, like him, was, at once, well acquainted with 
 the circle of the court, with city conflicts, with the public of- 
 fices of government, and with the characters and habits of the 
 leaders of the parties and their runners." Whether our hy-
 
 238 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 pothesis increases or diminishes this difficulty, we leave to the 
 future consideration of the reader* On any other, difficulties 
 multiply to an extent that is discouraging. 
 
 We can cite several passages to show, that to speak truth 
 concerning himself, by no means entered into the plan of Ju- 
 nius. He wrote a letter signed " Anti-Fox" in reply to a 
 pert one, written by the afterwards famous Charles Fox, when 
 a mere youth, in which our author says, " I know nothing of 
 Junius." Mr. Woodfall knew, that the assertion was untrue. 
 In the pages of Junius, we discover under the thin guise of 
 carelessness, and now and then a sly air of artlessness, a 
 studied artifice to conceal his rank and condition. When pre- 
 dicting that his book will be transmitted to posterity, he art- 
 fully changes his tone, and says, in gentle accents, " Mine, I 
 confess, are humble labors. I do not presume to instruct the 
 learned, but simply to inform the people." After telling us, 
 that he is a plain, unlettered man, he, in the same humble 
 strain, says, " I should be inconsistent with the principles I 
 profess, if I declined an appeal to the good sense of the people, 
 or did not willingly submit myself to the judgment of my 
 peers " ; as if he was one of the undistinguished commonalty. 
 But whenever Junius addresses personages of the highest rank, 
 and him with whom there is no competition, there is a tone of 
 equality, which Dean Swift was unable to assume and maintain 
 with credit. In Junius it fits as naturally as his skin ; in Swift 
 it resembles a dramatist, his elbows and his immovable fea- 
 tures appearing through the disguise. But Junius is always 
 dignified. In his public letters, we see him in his robes ; in 
 his privates ones, in his rich gown and slippers, and always the 
 nobleman. That he was a man past the noon of life, appears 
 from several circumstances. In a letter to Mr. Wilkes, in Au- 
 gust 21, 1771, which, though lengthy, is not a long one, he 
 concludes with saying, " I am heartily weary of writing, and 
 shall reserve another subject on which 1 mean to address you." 
 And in a note to the same gentleman, thanking him for his 
 offer of tickets to the Lord Mayor's ball, he says, " But alas !
 
 STRATAGEMS OF JUNIUS. 239 
 
 my age and figure would do but little credit to my partner." 
 And in writing to him again in September 18, he thus expresses 
 his personal feelings ; " In pursuing such inquiries, I lie un- 
 der a singular disadvantage. Not venturing to consult those 
 who are qualified to inform me, I am forced to collect every 
 thing from books, or common conversation. The pains I took 
 with that paper upon privilege were greater than I can express 
 to you. Yet after I had blinded myself with pouring over 
 journals, debates, and parliamentary history, I was at last 
 obliged to hazard a bold assertion with an air of carelessness." * 
 Here we see an infirm, old man, spectacles and all. We, how- 
 ever, reiterate the observation, that, whenever Junius mentions 
 himself, or speaks of Lord Chatham, it is in a very cau- 
 tious and guarded manmer, or in a parenthesis \ and never 
 in a style to be construed into contempt. Thus, in a note to 
 Mr. Woodfall, he says, " By your affected silence, you en- 
 courage the idle opinion that I am the author of the ' Whig,' 
 though you very well know the contrary. I neither admire 
 the writer nor his Idol." This idol was Lord Chatham him- 
 self, whom the whig panegyrizes in very warm terms. 
 
 In Letter XIV. under the signature of Philo- Junius , he 
 says, " The Duke of Grafton has always some excellent rea- 
 son for deserting his friends, — the age and incapacity of Lord 
 Chatham, the debility of Lord Rockingham, or the infamy of 
 Mr. Wilkes." To which Mr. Heron subjoins this note. — 
 " Lord Chatham, having, from early life, suffered much by 
 the gout, was, at this time, exceedingly afflicted with it. But 
 he had often opportunities to show, after this period, that the 
 vigor of his mind remained unconquered by the infirmities of 
 his body. To the last, he was able to shake the Senate, even 
 with more energetic and impressive eloquence, than in the 
 first pride and ambition of his youth." 
 
 *We, on this side of the Atlantic, can enter into his feelings in this 
 respect. We may make ridiculous mistakes in trifling facts, which a 
 Londoner might answer in a minute.
 
 240 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 We may remark, amongst other things, in this miscellaneous 
 chapter, that Lord Chatham, in a speech in Parliament in 
 1770, makes bitter and fretful complaints of the hypocritical 
 conduct of the Duke of Grafton, during his illness at Bath and 
 Hampstead, and insinuates, more than once, that the Duke had 
 dealt treacherously with him. Now, it is worthy of remark, 
 that Junius, in the paragraph immediately following the strange 
 eulogy on Lord Chatham already mentioned, says, " My de- 
 testation of the Duke of Grafton is not founded upon his 
 treachery to any individual, though I am willing enough to 
 suppose, that, in public affairs, it would be impossible to de- 
 sert or betray Lord Chatham, without doing an essential injury 
 to the country. My abhorrence to the Duke arises from an 
 intimate knowledge of his character, and from a thorough con- 
 viction, that his baseness has been the cause of greater mischief 
 to England, than even the unfortunate ambition of Lord 
 Bute." How happened it, that Junius never speaks of Lord 
 Bute in that bitter style of abhorrence, which he utters to- 
 wards Grafton, Bedford, Barrington, Mansfield, and some oth- 
 er noblemen ? * In the same very able letter (LIV.) he says, 
 alluding to the politics of the city of London, " It is unneces- 
 sary to bind Lord Chatham by the written formality of an en- 
 gagement [as some in the city proposed.] He has publicly 
 declared himself a convert to triennial Parliaments; and though 
 I have long been convinced, that this is the only possible 
 resource we have left to preserve the substantial freedom of 
 the constitution, I do not think we have a right to determine 
 against the integrity of Lord Rockingham or his friends," — 
 amongst whom stood conspicuously Lord Chatham. 
 
 On this passage Mr. Heron remarks, that " Junius here 
 evaded any decision between the principles of the two subdi- 
 visions of the whig-party. He was afraid to stir up any dis- 
 cussion, which might tend to set them, unseasonably, at vari- 
 
 * It is pretty evident that Lord Chatham, as well as Junius, believed 
 that the ruling Daemon, in the interior, secret cabinet, was a female.
 
 JUNIUS' CO-OPERATION WITH THE WHIGS. 241 
 
 ance. The grand distinction between them, as to principle, 
 respected the reform of Parliament. The Newcastle and 
 Rockingham whigs were disposed to preserve septennial Par- 
 liaments ; while the followers of Pitt and the Grenvilles were 
 half inclined to gratify the popular cry for the restoration of 
 triennial elections. We cannot enough admire the address 
 with which Junius praises and justifies both, and strives to 
 confirm their mutual reconciliation, yet without making him- 
 self responsible for the principles and conduct of either." 
 
 To these apt remarks we may add, what is worth consider- 
 ation, the delicate situation of Lord Chatham, as it regarded 
 his brother-in-law, Lord Temple, and the Marquis of Rock- 
 ingham, at that time. Lord Chatham, naturally overbearing 
 and peremptory, had fallen out with both these distinguished 
 members of the great whig-party. It had been a division, or 
 rather distinction, without absolute discord, until a personal 
 coolness and estrangement took place between the two broth- 
 ers, on account of some ministerial dispositions misunderstood. 
 By the intervention of common friends, a reconciliation was at 
 length brought about with both, adding strength to their former 
 amity. This unhappy schism, and the recently restored har- 
 mony, will account, on our hypothesis, for the singular cast of 
 the Fifty-fourth Letter of Junius, which, while it bears strong 
 marks of wonderful povvers of mind, bears not a few traits of 
 embarrassment, and seems employed as a vehicle to convey 
 assistance in bolstering up, in the view of the public, the 
 invalid Lord Chatham, who was in that cautious and delicate 
 state which always follows the re-union of broken friend- 
 ship. 
 
 Beside the cautious phraseology, and sly air of affected care- 
 lessness, or, if you please, studied artlessness, practised by Juni- 
 us, whenever he mentions Lord Chatham, it is a circumstance 
 equally remarkable, that his Lordship has never once uttered 
 the name of Junius, in any speech that has come down to us, 
 even while earnestly discussing the subject of the prosecution 
 of Woodfall for publishing his Letter to the King. It is al- 
 
 31
 
 242 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ways Woodfall, and never Junius. Among peculiarities, how 
 came it to pass that a character so prominent, so very active, 
 efficient, and respectable, as Richard Grenville, Lord Temple, 
 is never once named in the Letters of Junius ? Again, how 
 came it, that Lord Chatham, clarum et venerabile nomen, the 
 object of Junius's veneration, was never called on by him to 
 aid the cause in which he risked his life, and more than life ? 
 
 Pitt, Earl of Chatham, and Henry Fox, Lord Holland, 
 were school-fellows. The latter was a great favorite of George 
 the Second, who wished Chatham to admit him into his admin- 
 istration, but the minister refused the request of his sovereign 
 peremptorily ; yet was there a steady personal friendship be- 
 tween those two noblemen. Lord Holland was the much ap- 
 proved paymaster-general, during the whole of Mr. Pitt's 
 triumphant administration ; a post of great trust, in which in- 
 tegrity was a sine qua non, and where dishonor could not re- 
 main while that minister was at the helm. 
 
 The conduct of Lord Chatham towards Lord Holland 
 is entitled to particular notice, inasmuch as the like partiality 
 is discoverable in Junius towards that nobleman. The 
 younger Woodfall remarks, that " Junius appears to have uni- 
 formly entertained a good opinion of, or, at least, a partiality 
 for Lord Holland." The late celebrated Charles Fox, son 
 of the nobleman just mentioned, when young and forward, had 
 the hardihood to attack Junius, who condescended to reply to 
 him, under the signature of Anti-Fox, bearing traits of authen- 
 ticity ; and, after saying that " he knew nothing of Junius " ! 
 adds, " I see plainly, that he designedly spared Lord Holland 
 and his family. Whether Junius should be wantonly pro- 
 voked, are questions worthy the Black Boy's * consideration." 
 Now Pitt and the father of Charles were friends from boy- 
 hood. Fox was the elder by three years, and very much 
 attached to Mr. Pitt through life ; yet they seldom drew to- 
 
 * Charles Fox was of so dark a complexion, that he looked more like - 
 a Portuguese Jew than a Christian.
 
 JUNIUS' CO-OPERATION WITH THE WHIGS. 243 
 
 gether in politics, whether in the Commons or House of Peers. 
 Nevertheless they had a personal regard for each other. Fox 
 was a quick, warm-tempered man, yet his coolness and pa- 
 tience, under the tart remarks of Pitt, were noticed as far 
 back as the year 1755. Mr. Fox, however, appeared always 
 to delight in praising the oratorial powers of his old friend and 
 political opponent ; while he, in return, speaks handsomely of 
 his school-mate ; and when they did wrangle, it was more 
 like the querimoniousness of brothers than real enmity. They 
 were very different men in constitution and habits. The 
 bond of attachment between friends in both sexes is not al- 
 ways similarity of disposition ; but often the reverse. Mr. 
 Fox was a strong-fibred, hardy, healthy man, frank, open, 
 and agreeable ; but impetuous in his temper, social, industrious 
 in business, companionable, fond of drinking and gaming, 
 with a strong bias to dissipation, and totally divested of that 
 repellent atmosphere which surrounded the lofty Mr. Pitt. 
 This same Lord Holland was a powerful speaker, and a good 
 and candid judge of oratory in others ; but in the graces of 
 elocution, in imagination, in fluency, in fire and pathos, greatly 
 inferior to his friend Lord Chatham. Amid failings like these, 
 which he transmitted to his favorite son, he was respected 
 by all, as a man of honor, generosity, spirit, and veracity ; 
 hence we wonder not that Junius felt for him a friendly 
 solicitude, when accused, by some of the city-patriots, of mal- 
 versation in his office, as paymaster of the land forces. 
 Do these facts strengthen or weaken our hypothesis ? 
 
 In a sharp altercation between the two friends in the House 
 of Commons, Mr. Pitt took pains to remove every idea of 
 personality to the other ; while Mr. Fox uttered several short 
 and sullen compliments indicative of his veneration for the 
 talents and open and manly conduct of Mr. Pitt, who, notwith- 
 standing all that has been said, steadily rejected the overtures 
 of Mr. Fox to be united with him in a proposed new adminis- 
 tration. We think we could, with the help of Lord Chester- 
 field, explain this, were it to our purpose here ; but we must
 
 244 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 not stray too far from our road, even in a chapter professed!)' 
 miscellaneous. We shall only remark, that Lord Bute, who 
 was not quite so bad a man as many in America have supposed, 
 but who had more cunning than wisdom, courted the confi- 
 dential friendship of the newly created Lord Holland, in or- 
 der to make a complete breach between him and the noble- 
 man whom Bute most dreaded. We would also remark, that 
 it appears that Lord Chatham had the like feelings towards 
 Lord Holland as towards his brother-in-law, George Grenville, 
 — strong personal regard without political unity. 
 
 A sensible commentator on Junius * observes, that all 
 whom Lord Bute could consult, whether whigs or tories, 
 agreed in one common desire to see Pitt and his family 
 connexions, the Grenvilles, humbled and driven from of- 
 fice before they should be able to fortify themselves too 
 strongly to be removed. The same commentator further re- 
 marks, that " the Grenvilles, the Earl of Chatham, the Marquis 
 of Rockingham, and their respective adherents, supposed the 
 business of government could not go on, unless the King should 
 implicitly resign the whole ministerial powers into their hands ; 
 and that they were preparing, by every means, to secure, be- 
 yond the possibility of disappointment, the grand object of 
 their expectations ; and that, not unconscious of the strength 
 of public opinion, they used every artifice to make it raise 
 a voice continually louder and louder in their favor ; and that 
 Junius, privy to their secrets, though they might not be con- 
 scious of Ais,-j- was willing to promote, in an exertion bold- 
 er and of greater effort, than any he had hitherto made, that 
 success of his party, of which he was, perhaps, to share the 
 spoils ; that, with this view, he wrote his Letter to the King, 
 
 * Mr. Heron. 
 
 f " There did, and perhaps there still does exist, a private letter from 
 Junius to Mr. Grenville, professing political attachment, and at the 
 same time discouraging all attempts to pluck off his mask." — Edin. 
 Revieivfor June, 1826.
 
 CHATHAM OPPOSED TO AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE. 245 
 
 at a critical time, when they hoped to force themselves, in a 
 body, into administration, by a consentaneous effort." 
 
 Although Lord Chatham was a great friend to the colonies, 
 he never countenanced their independency, but uniformly 
 maintained the supremacy of Parliament over them, yet denying 
 its right to tax them without their consent ; and he opposed, 
 with all his powers, the rash attempt of George the Third to 
 try the question with America by force of arms. As to our 
 aiming at independency, he said he saw no evidence of it. 
 Dr. Franklin declared, that he never heard the wish expressed 
 by any order of men, in any part of America, nor under any 
 circumstances, riotous or sober, from the pulpit to the bar- 
 room of a country tavern. There are no traces of it in the 
 writings or speeches of James Otis, nor a syllable to that effect 
 in the Letters of Washington, prior to July, 1776. Neverthe- 
 less, the idea, the wish, the intention and principle of it was 
 cherished in JVeiv England from the time .of the first Gover- 
 nor Winthrop, to Governor Samuel Adams. Yes, the heroic 
 passion of independence from Britain, from Europe, grew 
 with our growth, and strengthened with our strength ; and at 
 last it was warmly advocated by Dr. Franklin in a celebrated 
 publication entitled Common Sense, the joint work of that 
 great philosopher and Thomas Paine. Franklin laid the foun- 
 dation of the structure and put up the frame-work, and Paine 
 finished it in his strong and peculiar manner. My authority 
 for saying this is my kinsman, Dr. Fothergill, in whose 
 house I resided three years, and between whom and Franklin 
 long subsisted the intimacy of congenial minds respecting 
 American and British politics. Franklin's agency in that cele- 
 brated pamphlet is glanced at in his Memoirs. 
 
 With Franklin, next in affection, after America, was Eng- 
 land ; with Fothergill, next to England, were the colonies. 
 They both wished that tin. 1 British colors, the emblem of sove- 
 reignty, should be worn by America. With both, their union 
 was a darling object. Fothergill went so far as to express in 
 print a wish, that the British government would promote schol-
 
 246 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 arships for Americans in their universities ; and that they 
 would give posts and benefits in this country to such Ameri- 
 cans as had studied in England preferably to others, and 
 that the government should permit such youths to pass to 
 Europe in the king's ships gratis. Dr. Fothergill thought that 
 this would unite more firmly characters of the first order, by 
 their mixing with the British at the universities, and diffusing 
 thence a spirit of inquiry after America, of which country the 
 English were strangely ignorant, and thus cement friendships on 
 both sides ; and that this would be a more lasting benefit to 
 each country, than all the ships and armies that could be sent 
 across the Atlantic. Few if any Englishmen was better ac- 
 quainted with the American colonies than Dr. Fothergill. He 
 communicated his ideas, occasionally, through the London 
 newspapers, in essays under various signatures, many of which 
 I transcribed for the press. As early as 1765, when he saw 
 measures, which appeared to him ill-timed and impolitic, he pub- 
 lished a pamphlet of thirty-five pages, entitled, " Considerations 
 relative to the JVo?ih American Colonies," which evinces his 
 affection for both countries. 
 
 He was family-physician to most of the old nobility, as well 
 as many of the new, and was occasionally called into consultation 
 at the bed-side of the highest in rank and station ; by which he 
 had an opportunity of knowing the sentiments of the prime, as 
 well as the secondary movers of the political machine, — its 
 wheels as well as its leaden weights. I well remember Lord 
 Shelburne calling at Dr. Fothergill's, and leaving a copy of 
 " Common Sense," at its very first appearance in London. 
 For several days the good Doctor appeared taciturn and ab- 
 stracted. Within a week perhaps, he gave me the pamphlet 
 to read, charging me to let no one see it. I read it as a 
 Spaniard or Portuguese would read an interdicted book in the 
 vicinity of the inquisition. It gave to my thoughts a new di- 
 rection, and occupied my mind day and night. It raised in 
 me a new train of prospective ideas, — glorious ones, be sure, 
 yet dreadful, — " the battle of the warrior, with confused
 
 SAMUEL ADAMS AND STEPHEN HOPKINS. 247 
 
 noise, and garments rolled in blood ! '' Franklin and Fothergill 
 corresponded now and then, after the former became our minis- 
 ter at the court of France. The latter told me that he saw the 
 sotd of Franklin in every page of that forceable pamphlet. 
 I was the bearer of a long letter, which Dr. Fothergill deliver- 
 ed to me open, for Dr. Franklin in Paris, in the summer of 
 1780, being a plan of reconciliation and general pacification, 
 resembling, in some respects, " the Holy Alliance.'''' j- After 
 reading it, Dr. Franklin said to me, " Your kinsman, and my 
 most excellent friend, has a better opinion of the world than I 
 have. He has seen only the best side of it. I have seen both. 
 He judges men by his own good heart and candid mind." 
 
 But to return to the subject of the Independence of the Colo- 
 nies. The idea, nay die principle of it, was more or less 
 cherished from the beginning of the settlement of Massachu- 
 setts, especially in Boston ; and particularly by Samuel Ad- 
 ams, whose name and character I revere as the great file- 
 leader of our revolution. Stephen Hopkins, for many years 
 governor of the colony of Rhode Island, the oldest man in our 
 first Congress, and the senior signer of the Declaration of In- 
 dependence in July, 1776, repeatedly uttered that language to 
 confidential friends. He was in fact the Samuel Mams of Rhode 
 Island. It is a remarkable circumstance, that the character, 
 standing, and agency of Samuel Adams, are better known out 
 of New England, than in his native Boston ; for the grave has 
 closed over nearly every one of his fellow-laborers, and left 
 a generation that knew him not. 
 
 Mr. Adolphus speaks of him, in his History of England, 
 thus. " Samuel Adams, a distinguished leader of the Ameri- 
 can councils, noted for subtlety, perseverance, and inflexibility, 
 boasted in all companies [he was no boaster, but a polite gen- 
 tleman of modest carriage], that he had toiled twenty years to 
 accomplish the measure [independency]. During that time, 
 
 f It was a college of crowned heads to keep the peace of the world, 
 by restraining those passions whence come wars and fightings.
 
 248 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 he had carried his art and industry so far, as to search after 
 every rising genius in the New England seminaries, employed 
 his utmost abilities to fix in their minds the principles of Ameri- 
 can independency, and now triumphed in his success." * 
 
 The Rev. Dr. William Gordon, another Englishman, who 
 resided a number of years near Boston as a parish minister, 
 says, " that Samuel Adams became a member of the legisla- 
 ture in September, 1765 ; that he was zealously attached to 
 the rights of Massachusetts in particular, and the colonies in 
 general, and but little to his own personal interest ; that he 
 was well qualified to second Mr. Otis, and learned in time to 
 serve his own political views by the influence of the other ; 
 that he was soon noticed by the House, chosen and continued 
 their clerk from year to year, by which means he had the cus- 
 tody of their papers ; and of these he knew how to make an 
 advantage for political purposes. He was frequently upon im- 
 portant committees, and acquired great ascendency by discov- 
 ering a readiness to acquiesce in the proposals and amend- 
 ments of others, while the end aimed at by them did not even- 
 tually frustrate his leading designs. He showed a pliableness 
 and complaisance in these smaller matters which enabled him, 
 in the issue, to carry those of much greater consequence ; 
 and . there were," says the historian, " many favorite points, 
 which the ' sons of liberty,' in Massachusetts meant to carry, 
 even though the stamp-act should be repealed." j- 
 
 President Jefferson, in a letter to Samuel Adams's grand- 
 son, says of him, " He was truly a great man, wise in council, 
 fertile in resources, immoveable in his purposes, and had, I 
 think, a greater share than any other member [of Congress], 
 in advising and directing our measures in the northern war. 
 As a speaker, he could not be compared with his living col- 
 league and namesake, J whose deep conceptions, nervous style, 
 and undaunted firmness, made him truly our bulwark in de- 
 
 * Vol. ii. p. 363. f Letter IV. p. 152. New York edition. 1789. 
 J John Adams.
 
 SAMUEL ADAMS AND STEPHEN HOPKINS. 249 
 
 bate. But Samuel Adams, although not of fluent elocution, 
 was so rigorously logical, so clear in views, abundant in sense, 
 and master always of his subject, that he commanded the 
 most profound attention whenever he rose in an assembly, 
 where the froth of declamation was heard with the most sove- 
 reign contempt." 
 
 The following is a letter from Mr. Jefferson to the author, 
 dated Monticello, January 31, 1819. 
 
 " Dear Sir, — Your letter of the 15th was received on the 
 27th, and I am glad to find the name and character of Samuel 
 Adams coming forward, and in so good hands as I suppose 
 them to be. I was the youngest man but one in the old 
 Congress, and he the oldest but one, as I believe. His only 
 senior, I suppose, was Stephen Hopkins, of and by whom the 
 honorable mention made in your letter was richly merited. 
 
 " Although my high reverence for Samuel Adams was re- 
 turned by habitual notices from him, which highly flattered me, 
 yet the disparity of age prevented intimate and confidential 
 communications. I always considered him, more than any 
 other member, the fountain of our important measures; and 
 although he was neither an eloquent nor easy speaker, what- 
 ever he said was sound, and commanded the profound atten- 
 tion of the House. 
 
 " In the discussions on the floor of Congress, he reposed 
 himself on our main pillar in debate, Mr. John Adams. These 
 two gentlemen were verily a host in our councils. Compari- 
 sons with their associates, Northern or Southern, would an- 
 swer no profitable purpose ; but they would suffer by com- 
 parison with none. I salute you with perfect esteem and respect. 
 
 Th. Jefferson. 
 Dr. Waterhouse, Cambridge." 
 
 At the close of a very interesting letter written to me by the 
 
 first President Adams, January 30, 1818, he says, " If ever 
 
 human beings had a right to say 
 
 Hos ego versiculos feci, tulit alter honores ; 
 
 and 
 Sic V03 non vobis mellificatis, apes ; 
 
 32
 
 250 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 they were James Otis and Samuel Adams. And to them 
 ought statues to be erected, and not to John." 
 
 If ever'men labored for others, and not for themselves, they 
 were those early patriots ; and should Boston ever honor her- 
 self by erecting a monument to Samuel Adams, sic vos non 
 vobis should be inscribed on it. 
 
 Whatever construction may be put on it, I am led, in honor 
 of truth, to concede, that the leading men in the colonies of 
 Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and, I believe, Connecticut, 
 contemplated independency from the first settlement of the 
 country ; and that Samuel Adams was the first man who em- 
 bodied that noble sentiment, and, with caution and great ad- 
 dress, diffused that doctrine from North to South, until it be- 
 came, in the year seventy-six, the vital principle in our con- 
 stitution. 
 
 The question, With whom, or where commenced the revolu- 
 tion ? is as difficult as that of the first inventors of a thousand 
 good things. President Jefferson in a letter to me, dated March 
 3, 1818, says, " I suppose it would be difficult to trace our revo- 
 lution to its first embryo. We do not know how long it 
 was hatching in the British cabinet, before they ventured to 
 make the first of the experiments which were to develope it in 
 the end, and to produce complete parliamentary supremacy. 
 Those you mention in Massachusetts, as preceding the stamp- 
 act, might be the first visible symptoms of that design. The 
 proposition of that act, in 1764, was the first here. Your op- 
 position, therefore, preceded ours, as occasion was sooner 
 given there than here ; and the truth, I suppose, is, that the 
 opposition, in every colony, began whenever the encroachment 
 was presented to it. This question of priority is as the in- 
 quiry would be, who first of the three hundred Spartans offer- 
 ed his name to Leonidas. I shall be happy to see justice done 
 to the merits of all, by the unexceptionable umpire of dates 
 and facts, and especially from the pen which is proposed to be 
 employed in it."
 
 SAMUEL ADAMS. 251 
 
 Samuel Adams was graduated at the university of Cam- 
 bridge in the year 1740, when he discussed the following the- 
 sis, " Whether it be lawful to resist the Supreme Magistrate, 
 if the Commonwealth cannot otherwise be preserved ? " He 
 maintained the affirmative, which was remarkable for that time 
 and place ; for it was in presence of the King's Governor and 
 his Council, in the reign of George the Second, while Sir 
 Robert Walpole was prime minister, and when' these colonies 
 had nothing to complain of from Britain, the aged monarch be- 
 ing popular, and we Americans very loyal. Then England 
 was called our " home" and we almost adored King, Lords, 
 and Commons, and hated the very name of a Frenchman and 
 Spaniard, and abhorred, alike, the Pope, the Devil, and an 
 English Bishop. 
 
 When Samuel Adams attained his first degree in the 
 arts at Cambridge, John Adams was five years old, and Jo- 
 siah Quincy and Joseph Warren yet unborn. James Otis was 
 three years after Samuel Adams in the catalogue of graduates, 
 and Mr. Quincy twenty-three years after him. John Adams 
 was graduated in 1755, which was fifteen years after the gradu- 
 ation of Samuel. Samuel Adams was distinguished at the 
 university for a serious and retired cast of mind. He meant to 
 devote himself to the gospel ministry, yet he paid great attention 
 to Greek and Roman history. Livy and Tacitus were his fa- 
 vorite authors ; but Divinity was the profession he meant to 
 live and die by. What particularly diverted him from it, we 
 are unable to say ; probably the terrible and gloomy part of 
 the system of Calvin then in vogue, a system founded on Scrip- 
 ture misunderstood. 
 
 The year Samuel Adams entered the university was the 
 same in which Pitt, Earl of Chatham, entered the British 
 Parliament, so that Mr. Adams must have seen the whole of 
 that great statesman's career, from 1738 to 1778, when that 
 nobleman died. During Pitt's administration, the Parliament 
 was unanimous in supporting his measures. From 1757 to 
 1760, the British arms were successful in every quarter of the
 
 252 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 globe ; the royal marine of France was reduced to ten ships 
 of the line and a few frigates, while England was at the very 
 pinnacle of her power and glory, with thirteen growing, happy, 
 and grateful American colonies. But this enviable state did 
 not last long. In 1760 King George the Second suddenly 
 died, and his grandson reigned in his stead. Then came in 
 amongst us political sin and oppression, and their shadow, re- 
 venge ; then orders were sent from " home," enabling the 
 King's collectors to command all sheriffs and constables to attend 
 and aid them in breaking open houses, stores, shops, cellars, ships, 
 bales, trunks, &,c. &c. to search for goods, which had escaped 
 paying certain taxes or duties, imposed by acts of Parliament, 
 procured through the influence of certain royal governors and 
 certain West India planters. Dreading the resistance of the 
 Bostonians, the governor made the experiment first in Salem. 
 But the Supreme Court, then sitting in that old, phlegmatic 
 town, ordered that the " great question " of the legality of 
 those writs of assistance should be argued in Boston. It was 
 then, that James Otis burst forth, the blazing champion of the 
 rights of the colonies. Knowing he had the law on his side, 
 he gave a loose rein to his oratorial powers. Its coruscations 
 and impetuosity dazzled and bore down the mildness of Thach- 
 er and the solemnity of Gridley. Such oratory was new to 
 John Adams, and made a very strong impression on his young 
 mind, and induced him to estimate James Otis fully equal to his 
 value. He was, it is true, a very daring, disinterested, active, 
 and valuable partisan ; yet was he under the control of cooler 
 heads than his own. Some very important papers of that day 
 (1768) were sketched by Mr. Otis, and then submitted to the 
 revision and correction of Samuel Adams; and this was a con- 
 stant practice of that fiery orator. In fact there were few, 
 if any, very important papers, published between 1764 and 
 1769, in Boston, that were not revised by the cool and solid 
 judgment of the New England Phocion. Upon several com- 
 munications sent to printers by Mr. Josiah Quincy, was written, 
 " Let Samuel Adams, Esq. correct the press." It cannot be
 
 SAMUEL ADAMS. 253 
 
 supposed, that this meant literary and verbal criticism, seeing- 
 Adams was the Gamaliel of Warren and Quincy. Otis was a 
 learned lawyer, and, though generally charged plus with en- 
 thusiasm, was the very character those trying times re- 
 quired (he dared to say more in public than any other man) ; 
 times, which also required the cooler heads of Samuel Adams, 
 Joseph Hawley, and James Bowdoin, in Massachusetts, and of 
 John Dickinson in Pennsylvania, and Stephen Hopkins in 
 Rhode Island. 
 
 "Mr. Samuel Adams," says the historian Gordon, "long since 
 said, in small, confidential companies, ' This country shall be in- 
 dependent, and we will be satisfied with nothing short of it.' " * 
 
 * An anecdote may show Mr. Adams's address and management in 
 a popular assembly or " Town-meeting,' 1 '' when one portion of their 
 business was an association not to import goods from Britain into Bos- 
 ton, until certain grievances were redressed. 
 
 A Mr. M c , a Scotchman and large importer, refused to join 
 
 the association. The Scotch, whatever they were in former reigns, were 
 remarkable for their loyalty to George the Third, and are generally 
 pretty stubborn where their interest is concerned. It was reported to 
 
 a large town-meeting, convened in Fanueil Hall, that Mr. M c 
 
 still refused to put his name to the non-importation agreement. Some 
 were wroth on the occasion, which Mr. Samuel Adams by no means 
 encouraged, for the suaviter in modo was a trait in his energetic char- 
 acter. The committee was directed to call on the recusant again ; 
 they returned with the same answer ; when Mr. Adams rose up and 
 moved, that the meeting (about two thousand persons) should re- 
 solve itself into a committee of the whole house, and wait upon Mr. 
 
 M c , at the close of the meeting, to urge his compliance with 
 
 the general wish ; which being agreed without a dissenting voice, they 
 proceeded to transact the business before them, f Mr. Adams knew, 
 that M c had friends in the meeting, some of whom im- 
 mediately slipped away to inform him, that the ivhole body would, as a 
 committee, wait upon him at the close of the meeting. The conse- 
 quence was, as Mr. Adams expected. In the midst of their delibera- 
 tions on other subjeets, in pushes Mr. M c , all in a foam, and 
 
 bowing to the chairman and to Mr. Adams, told them that he was 
 
 •f- After iliis Samuel ami John Adams opposed, in Congress, the non importation schotne, lost 
 the country should bo exhausted ot'ceitaiu necessary articles when they came to fight.
 
 254 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 When the noted Mr. Galloway and a few of his ignorant 
 adherents were for entering their protest in Congress against an 
 open rupture with Britain, Samuel Adams, rising slowly from his 
 seat, said, " I should advise persisting in our struggle for lib- 
 erty, though it were revealed from Heaven, that nine hundred 
 and ninety-nine were to perish, and only one freeman of a 
 thousand survive, and retain his liberty. That one freeman 
 must possess more virtue and enjoy more happiness, than a 
 thousand slaves : let him propagate his like, and transmit to 
 them what he had so nobly preserved." But Mr. James Otis 
 maintained, " that we must and ought to yield obedience to 
 an act of Parliament, though erroneous, till repealed ; that the 
 power of Parliament was uncontrolable but by themselves." 
 Samuel and John Adams spoke a different language.* 
 
 Chalmers, who is respectable authority, strengthens our as- 
 sertions of an undeviating spirit of independency which ac- 
 
 ready and willing to put his name to the non-importation agreement ; 
 after which Samuel Adams pointed to a seat near him, with a polite, 
 condescending bow of protection in the presence of the people, which 
 quieted the alarm of the discreet Scotchman, who was struck with 
 dread at the idea of two thousand people presenting themselves before 
 his dwelling, and wished to avoid the comminatory honor. The mob, 
 which destroyed Lord Mansfield's house and set London on fire in 
 twenty places, was not composed of any of those persons who were 
 collected, in the day-time, in St. George's Fields, and who marched to 
 the Parliament house, led by the crazy Lord George Gordon, who had 
 no hand in the riots ; yet was he tihe remote cause of them. 
 
 Thus did Samuel Adams, poor as Phocion, devote a large portion 
 of his life to the great cause of America, both as a contriver and exe- 
 cutor, by steady and unwearied steps that never faltered. No mon- 
 arch or state could, by rewards and honors, hire a man to neglect his 
 own domestic affairs, and devote every hour of his life to offices of all 
 kinds, as did this renowned patriot ; who, but for the death of his 
 only son (who left a few thousand dollars) must have been buried at 
 the public expense. 
 
 * John Adams, speaking in warm commendation of Jefferson, says, 
 " Though a silent member, he was so prompt, frank, explicit, and de- 
 cisive upon committees, — not even Samuel Adams tvas more so, — 
 that he soon seized my heart."
 
 TESTIMONY OF CHALMERS. 255 
 
 tuated the first settlers of New England. This gentleman 
 wrote his " Political Annals of the United Colonies," under 
 the influence, and probably by direction of the British govern- 
 ment, to prove the crying sin, that Massachusetts always aimed 
 at independence. The work was written during our contro- 
 versy with England. The author was a secretary in the colo- 
 nial department, and had, as far as documents go, the best 
 means of information. He says, Book I. ch. vi. " Several 
 persons of considerable consequence in the nation, who had 
 adopted the principles of the Puritans, and who wished to en- 
 joy their own mode of worship, formed the resolution of emi- 
 grating to Massachusetts. But they felt themselves inferior 
 neither to the governor nor assistants of the company. They 
 saw and dreaded the inconvenience of being governed by laws 
 made for them without their consent ; and it appeared more 
 rational to them, that the colony should be ruled by those who 
 made it the place of their residence, than by men dwelling at 
 the distance of three thousand miles, over whom they had 
 no control. At the same time, therefore, that they proposed 
 to transport themselves, their families, and their estates to that 
 country, they insisted that the charter should be transmitted 
 with them, and that the corporate powers which were con- 
 ferred by it, should be executed, in future, in New Eng- 
 land." * 
 
 * It gives us pleasure to cite from any British work marked with the 
 like good sense, ability, and candor, as that by George Chalmers, Esq., 
 after reading such accounts of our military affairs and measures, as are 
 given by Stedman, Bisset, and Adolphus. Such provoking misrepresenta- 
 tions tend, more than any thing else, to perpetuate animosities- The 
 former speaks of the Americans scalping some of the British prisoners 
 at Lexington ! By their accounts the British had only to march up to the 
 Americans, and certain victory was the consequence ; whereas all Bos- 
 ton, men and women, saw the British soldiers fly twice before an infe- 
 rior number of raw militia at Bunker Hill, and on several other occasions. 
 Three years afterwards, Lord George Germaine actually sent a vast 
 number of live sheep and hogs to feed their conquering army, while 
 there were millions of those brutes belonging to American farmers ; 
 which the owners of them were able to protect against both British
 
 256 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Beside civil liberty, our ancestors came with a determi- 
 nation to enjoy religious freedom, and they obtained it. 
 " They left their native land," says Junius to the King, 
 " in search of freedom, and found it in a desert." To escape 
 from the tyranny of the English hierarchy was a powerful mo- 
 tive with the first emigrants. Archbishop Laud kept a jealous 
 eye over New England. Charles the Second and Massachusetts, 
 according to Chalmers, mutually hated antl contemned and 
 feared each other, because the one suspected its principles of 
 attachment, and the other dreaded an invasion of its privileges. 
 The General Court very early resolved, " That the patent or 
 charter (under God) was the first and main foundation of the 
 civil polity of Massachusetts ; that the governor and company 
 are, by the patent, a body politic, which is vested with power 
 to make freemen ; that they have authority to choose a gover- 
 nor, deputy-governor, assistants, and select representatives ; 
 that this government has ability to set up all kinds of offices ; 
 that the governor, deputy-governor, assistants, and select depu- 
 ties have full jurisdiction, both legislative and executive, for the 
 government of the people here, without appeals (excepting 
 laws repugnant to the laws of England) ; that this company is 
 privileged to defend itself against all who shall attempt its an- 
 noyance ; that any imposition, prejudicial to the country, con- 
 trary to any of its just ordinances (not repugnant to the laws of 
 England), is an infringement of its rights." * Yet our resist- 
 ance to British encroachments, in later times, has been stigma- 
 tized by the odious name of rebellion I Our ancestors quitted 
 Old England with a determination to enjoy self-government in 
 the New ; and we always acted up to this heroic resolution ; 
 for as early as 1652 a mint was erected in Boston, when the 
 government exercised that prerogative of sovereignty, coining 
 money, f After the death of Oliver Crommell, whom our fore- 
 
 and German marauders. Such facts must ever put to shame boastful 
 declamation, and that gasconade which marks and mars too many of 
 the British writers. 
 * Chalmers, Book I. p. 243. f Bearing the stamp of a pine tree.
 
 JOHN HANCOCK. 257 
 
 fathers feared and flattered, Massachusetts refused to acknowl- 
 edge the authority of his son Richard any more than that of 
 the Parliament, or Protector, because all submission, says 
 Chalmers, would have been inconsistent with her indepen- 
 dence. 
 
 Lord Chatham and Camden doubtless knew all these things, 
 while Lord North and his short-sighted master were as igno- 
 rant of them as Lord Bute himself. 
 
 One of the most fortunate steps of the sagacious Samuel 
 Adams was his yoking in with him the very rich and accom- 
 plished John Hancock, Esq. The cause of self-govern- 
 ment is under great obligations to both. . One gave to it his 
 great mind, and the other his fortune ; one obtained contempo- 
 rary celebrity, the other, like Napoleon, trusted posterity. 
 
 How rarely do we find two men alike ! Minds differ as 
 much as countenances, yet that difference impedes not union. 
 Adams and Hancock were very much unlike each other. To- 
 gether they formed that potent weapon, the arrow, — the ef- 
 ficient steel and the feather. Like Adams, Mr. Hancock was 
 a gentleman of an university education and cultivated taste ; he 
 was a remarkably good speaker, and resembled an English no- 
 bleman in dress, manners, style of living, and equipage, and was 
 grievously tormented with gout. I have thought that the char- 
 acter of Mr. Hancock was a compound of that of the Duke of 
 Newcastle and the Duke of Grafton, both of whom bustled at 
 the court of London in the early part of the reign of George the 
 Third ; while that of Mr. Adams could not be so readily paral- 
 leled. It partook of our conception of Phocion among the 
 Greeks, and of Cato among the Romans. With a counte- 
 nance expressive of benevolence and good humor was united 
 the inflexible virtue of a Regulus, dignified by a perfect com- 
 mand of temper. 
 
 That my venerated friend, John Adams, was as staunch 
 in his principles of independency as Samuel, no one can 
 doubt, who knows the man and his whole history ; but being 
 a professional man, he had neither the time nor opportunity 
 
 33
 
 258 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 of manifesting them so early, by a year or two, as his name- 
 sake.* The clear and cogent paragraphs and essays of Samuel 
 appeared, like those of Junius, in newspapers, prompt and to 
 the purpose aimed at; whereas those of John were more labor- 
 ed works, rich in authorities, profound in conception, strong in 
 expression, and never confuted. Samuel Adams absolutely 
 wielded that powerful engine, a free press, with the strong arm 
 of a giant. But that was not all ; he stood at the very ave- 
 nue of public opinion as it regarded the cause of freedom or 
 whiggism. James Otis was distinguished for the fire of genius, 
 a blaze of eloquence, and a daring manner of expressing his bril- 
 liant ideas ; yet he submitted his essays invariably to the men- 
 tal strainer of the great patriot, as did other less distinguished 
 ones. One day John and Samuel Adams were walking in the 
 Boston Mall, and when they came opposite the stately man- 
 sion of Mr. Hancock, the latter turning to the former, said, 
 with emphasis, " I have done a very good thing for our cause 
 in the course of the past week, by enlisting the master of that 
 house into it. He is well disposed and has great riches, and 
 we can give him consequence to enjoy them." And Mr. Han- 
 cock did not disappoint his high expectations ; for in spite of 
 his occasional capriciousness, owing partly to disease, he threw 
 all the weight of his fortune and extraordinary popularity into 
 the scale of opposition to British encroachments. Every body 
 knows, that Hancock and Adams were the only men ex- 
 cepted from the general amnesty by Gage's proclamation, issued 
 by royal authority, which capped the climax of their renown. 
 It was not, however, until the year 1768, that the doctrine 
 of independence assumed something like a system. If not an 
 absolute, active body and soul, it was an embryo, which has 
 grown in due time to a young Hercules, who, from first strang- 
 ling serpents in his cradle, has, in his adult state, performed his 
 
 * Samuel and John Adams had the same Proavus, or great grand- 
 father, and, of course, were second cousins to* each other. Their com- 
 mon ancestor emigrated from Braintree in England, and alighted upon 
 Mount Wollaston ; and called the town, after his native place, Brain- 
 tree ; a portion of which is now the town of Quincy.
 
 PORTRAIT OF SAMUEL ADAMS. 259 
 
 series of wonders ; and is now transferred among the heavenly- 
 signs. 
 
 I cannot leave this sketch of the character of Samuel Ad- 
 ams, without adding the finishing stroke, expressive of his mag- 
 nanimity. He always held up to an admiring populace the 
 splendid picture of his friend Hancock, while he himself stood 
 behind it, without allowing so much as his little finger to be 
 seen.* 
 
 After the death of Governor Hancock, Mr. Adams was 
 chosen Governor of Massachusetts (in 1794), and resigned the 
 station after sustaining it three years. 
 
 The son of Oxenbridge Thacher, whom we have already 
 mentioned, preached his funeral sermon, and said justly of 
 him, " The dignity of his manners was well expressed by the 
 majesty of his countenance ; an index of a mind never debased 
 by grovelling ideas, nor occupied in contemplating low pursuits ; 
 yet this appearance was accompanied with a suavity of tem- 
 per, qualifying him for those charities and graces so highly or- 
 namental to the most sublime and dignified character. Few 
 are there who better discharged the social relations of life ; 
 neither would it be easy to find a more tender husband, more 
 affectionate parent, or more faithful friend. He would easily 
 relax from severer care and study, to enjoy the delight of pri- 
 vate conversation ; so that some, who disliked his politics, 
 loved and revered him as a neighbour and friend. But though 
 he could thus disrobe himself from more elevated duties to at- 
 tend the calls of common life, yet his conduct and manners 
 embraced such correct decorum as never to deserve a re- 
 proof from the wise and good. His house was the seat of do- 
 
 * J. Adams and T. Jefferson retained their characteristic facul- 
 ties to the last, particularly the latter. But not quite so, Samuel 
 Adams. Memory seemed to slip away from him faster than in 
 either of the others ; and though he lost not his reasoning powers, the 
 operation of his mind seemed like that of a complicated machine al- 
 most worn out by its incessant action ; yet it never lost its balance, 
 but suffered a gradual and uniform decay, like falling to sleep through 
 weariness, the result of a regular and temperate life.
 
 260 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 mestic peace, of method and regularity. In a word, to borrow 
 the language of a very great man, in describing the life and 
 manners of a very good one, — " When did his walls ever wit- 
 ness any tumult or dissipation ; when was any spectacle or 
 conduct either to be seen or heard within them inconsistent 
 with the discipline of a most venerable and holy man." [Cice- 
 ro's Oration for Deiotarus, Governor of Galatia.] 
 
 Yet is there no monumental stone, erected any where, of this 
 meritorious man, and no other memorial but what is upon pa- 
 per written by others to tell that he ever existed ! — if, in- 
 deed, we may except a brass ' field-piece, dedicated to him by 
 the general Congress, at Philadelphia, on which is inscribed, 
 in bold relief, these words ; 
 
 " The 
 ADAMS. 
 Sacred to Liberty. 
 This is one of four cannon, which constituted the whole train 
 
 of Field Artillery, 
 
 Possessed by the British Colonies- of 
 
 North America, 
 
 At the Commencement of the war on the 
 
 19th of April, 1775. 
 
 This cannon and its fellow, belonging to a number of 
 
 citizens of Boston, were used in many 
 
 engagements during the war. 
 
 The other two, the property of the Government of 
 
 Massachusetts, were taken by the enemy. 
 
 By order of the United States, 
 
 In Congress assembled, 
 
 May 19th, 
 
 1788." 
 
 Why this brass field-piece is not placed on the floor of our 
 State House near to the fine marble Statue of Washington, 
 is a question hard to answer at this time.
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 PARALLELISM BETWEEN JUNIUs's LETTERS AND CHATHAM'S 
 
 SPEECHES. 
 
 Should these pages ever be read beyond the bounds of 
 these United States, the distant reader may form some idea 
 of the great American question from the preceding chapter, 
 brief as it is. He will see the opinion of that oracle of the 
 law, Earl Camden, respecting the right of the British Parlia- 
 ment to tax the Americans without their consent. Every one 
 knows the opinion of Lord Chatham and of the leading whigs 
 of England, who, on that subject, made a common cause with 
 the Americans, notwithstanding the King ventured to bring 
 that great question to trial before the grand jury of both 
 countries and the judgment-seat of the world*. 
 
 If the foreigner should pursue the subject, he will find, that 
 Lord North, the " King's Attorney," was, in this trial, a 
 timid man, betraying misgivings at every step, making it evident 
 that he acted not from himself, but from the Throne, if not 
 from behind it. On the other side, he may see that the first 
 English settlers of Massachusetts quitted their home, and came 
 to a wilderness to enjoy self-government, civil and religious, 
 with a determination to maintain it ; and that they did enjoy it, 
 and prospered, until after General Amherst completed the con- 
 quest of Canada. He will also learn, that the colonies gene- 
 rously submitted to a pretty heavy external tax under the guise
 
 262 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 of regulations of trade, as a contribution for protection, and in 
 conformity to the haughty navigation act ; but that they ever 
 obstinately resisted the smallest internal taxation. 
 
 The distant reader may perceive, that, although Samuel 
 Adams was the first apostle who preached Independency, yet 
 it was a principle cherished by the first emigrants, and nour- 
 ished in New England, from the time of the first Charles, 
 till we secured it by force of arms in 177Q. He will see also, 
 that the Boston apostle of it preached, as did the first apostles 
 of a still better cause, to a few fishermen and mechanics near 
 the seashore, and they to others, till it spread, like the gos- 
 pel, from humble persons and despised places, and shook all 
 that could then be shaken in certain kingdoms. Since which, 
 South America has listened to the doctrine ; degenerated 
 Greece has welcomed it ; and Turkey cannot much longer 
 keep her eyes entirely closed to its light, seeing Russia has 
 awakened, after her long, cold night of sleep. 
 
 But let us attend to our avowed object, the valorous knight 
 in a mask and armour of polished steel, and lay before the 
 reader such passages from his writings, and from the re- 
 ported speeches of Lord Chatham, as show their consimili- 
 tude of sentiment and even phraseology, in order to illustrate 
 the very high probability, that both emanated from the same 
 mind. 
 
 With this in View, we cannot do better, than quote a part of 
 two chapters from " Junius Identified," a pleasant book, 
 published without a name, a few years since, in London, in 
 order to prove that Sir Philip Francis was the author of the 
 Letters in question. The work was re-printed in America ; 
 and from it I learn, that it was written by Mr. John Taylor, a 
 bookseller in London. If so, he adds one more to the num- 
 ber of respectable writers belonging to that class. I give his 
 own words. " The compiler of this investigation was acci- 
 dentally turning over the pages of ' Almon's Jlnecdotps of Lord 
 Chatham,' when his eye was caught by several passages so 
 much in the style of Junius, as to call forth this observation,
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 263 
 
 that either Lord Chatham was the author of the Letters, or 
 Junius had reported Lord Chatham's speeches." 
 
 Whether Mr. Taylor unluckily took the left hand road, and I 
 the right, is submitted to the determination of the reader. 
 
 For myself I was struck and strongly impressed with the 
 consimilarity long before Almon's Anecdotes of Lord Chat- 
 ham were published, and have expressed this opinion, occa- 
 sionally, during the last forty years of my life. In contem- 
 plating the subject, from time to time, and comparing one thing 
 with another, and scanning the powers, conduct, and characters 
 of men, during the latter part of the reign of George the Sec- 
 ond and the first ten years of his grandson, George the Third, 
 I became rivetted in the opinion, that Lord Chatham was the 
 author of the Letters in question, and that no other man could 
 be. In the citation of parallel passages the reader has only to 
 substitute, instead of the name of Sir Philip Francis and Ju- 
 nius, that of Lord Chatham and Junius, and our object, in 
 this portion of our disquisition, will be answered. On the re- 
 view of the whole, the reader will see how one part coheres 
 with the other. 
 
 Beside congeniality in political principle and moral senti- 
 ment, there is a remarkable similarity in metaphors and figures 
 in the writings of Junius and the speeches of Chatham. We 
 shall mention some of them. 
 
 Junius closes one of his letters with a simile, considered by 
 some the finest in our language. — " Private credit is wealth, 
 public honor is security. The feather that adorns the royal 
 bird, supports his flight. Strip him of his plumage, and you 
 fix him to the earth." Now, unless Junius was Chatham, 
 this beautiful metaphor savours of plagiary. 
 
 Lord Chatham said, in the House of Peers, — "My Lords, 
 I revere the just prerogative of the crown, and would contend 
 for it as warmly as for the rights of the people. They are 
 linked together, and naturally support each other. ] would 
 not touch a feather of the prerogative. The expression, per- 
 haps, is too light ; but since I have made use of it, let me
 
 264 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 add, that the entire command and power of directing the local 
 disposition of the army is the royal prerogative, — is the master- 
 feather in the eagle's wing ; and if I were permitted to carry 
 the allusion a little farther, I should say, — they have disarmed 
 the imperial bird, — the ' ministrum fulminis alitem. y The 
 army is the thunder of the crown. The ministry have tied up 
 the hand which should direct the bolt." — Do we not here see 
 the germ in Chatham, of which the 'first quotation was the 
 flower of Junius ? 
 
 But it is not the similarity of figures so much as it is 
 the train of thought, the consimilarity of mind, which runs 
 through the speeches of Chatham, and pervades the Letters 
 of Junius, that has tended to convince me, that the speeches 
 of the one and the Letters of the other flowed from the same 
 clear intellectual fountain. 
 
 We here present our readers with a series of extracts, 
 selected and arranged in order to prove, that the report- 
 er of the speeches, namely, Sir Philip Francis, was the 
 identical author of the Letters ; whereas we contend, that the 
 great orator himself was, in fact, the penman of those cele- 
 brated productions, and we offer to our readers these parallel 
 passages as evidence of it. They are taken from the reports 
 of two. important debates in the House of Lords; one on the 
 ninth of January, and the other on the twenty-second of the 
 same month,' 1770, twelve months after the first Letter of 
 Junius appeared ; and but a few weeks after the date of his 
 famous Letter to the King ; — in a Word, in the height of the 
 energies of the letter-writer, and during the full blaze of the 
 eloquence of the orator. 
 
 PARALLEL PASSAGES FROM LORH CHATHAM'S SPEECHES AND 
 
 JUNIUs's LETTERS. 
 
 Lord Chatham said, that " he was satisfied there was a 
 power in some degree arbitrary, with which the constitution 
 trusted the crown, to be made use of under correction of the 
 legislature, and at the hazard of the minister, upon any sudden 
 emergency, or unforeseen calamity, which might threaten the
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 265 
 
 welfare of the people or the safety of the state. That on this 
 principle he had himself advised a measure, which he knew 
 was not strictly legal ; but he recommended it as a measure of 
 necessity, to save a starving people from famine, and had sub- 
 mitted to the judgment of his country." * 
 
 Junius. " That Parliament may review the acts of a min- 
 ister is unquestionable ; but there is a wide difference between 
 saying that the crown has a legal power, and that ministers 
 may act at their peril. Instead of asserting that the proclama- 
 tion was legal, he [Lord Camden] should have said, ' My 
 Lords, I know the proclamation was illegal, but I advised it 
 because it was indispensably necessary to save the kingdom 
 from famine, and I submit myself to the justice and mercy of 
 my country.'' " 
 
 Chatham said, " that the situation of our affairs was un- 
 doubtedly a matter of moment, and highly worthy their Lord- 
 ships' consideration ; but that he declared with grief, there 
 were other Tnatters still more important, and more urgently 
 demanding their attention. He meant the distractions and di- 
 visions which prevailed in every part of the empire. He la- 
 mented the unhappy measure, which had divided the colonies 
 from the mother country, and which he feared had drawn 
 them into excesses which he could not justify. He owned his 
 natural partiality for America, and was inclined to make allow- 
 ance even for these excesses. That they ought to be treated 
 with tenderness, for in his sense, they were ebullitions of liber- 
 ty, which broke out upon the skin, and were a sign, if not of 
 a perfect, at least of a vigorous constitution, and must not be 
 driven in too suddenly, lest they should strike to the heart." 
 
 Junius. " No man regards an eruption upon the surface, 
 when the noble parts are invaded, and he feels a mortification 
 approaching his heart." 
 
 * Prohibiting the exportation of corn in a year of scarcity. 
 34
 
 266 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 " I shall only say, give me a healthy, vigorous consti- 
 
 tution, and I shall hardly consult my looking-glass to discover 
 a blemish upon my ski i." 
 
 Chatham said, " that liberty was a plant that deserved to be 
 cherished, that he loved the tree, and wished well to every 
 branch of it ; that, like the vine in scripture, it had spread 
 from East to West, had embraced whole nations with its 
 branches, and sheltered them under its leaves. That the 
 Americans had purchased their liberty at a dear rate, since 
 they had quitted their native country, and gone in search of 
 freedom to a desert." 
 
 Junius. " They [the Americans] left their native land in 
 search of freedom, and found it in a desert.' 1 '' 
 
 Now, the passage from Junius bears the date of December 
 19, 1769, and the other was spoken by Chatham January 9, 
 1770. "In this instance," says Mr. Taylor, "the speech 
 copies the letters ; but to suppose that Chatham and Junius 
 reciprocally borrowed from each other, is to encounter a great- 
 er difficulty for the sake of avoiding a less." True, sir ; but 
 on our hypothesis, every difficulty is removed by supposing 
 that Junius felt, thought, and wrote like Chatham, in spite 
 of all his efforts at concealment. 
 
 Chatham said, " that it was the duty of that House to inquire 
 into the causes of the notorious dissatisfaction expressed by 
 the English nation, to state those causes to the sovereign, and 
 then to give him their best advice in what manner he ought to 
 act. That the privileges of the House of Peers, however 
 transcendent, however appropriated to them, stood, in fact, 
 upon the broad bottom of the People. They were no longer 
 in the condition of the barons, their ancestors, who had sepa- 
 rate interests, and separate strength to support them. The 
 rights of the greatest and of the meanest subjects now stood 
 upon the same foundation, — the security of law, common to a?/." 
 
 Junius, two months after, makes the same declaration in 
 different words. " However distinguished by rank or property, 
 in the rights of freedom we are all \:q,ual. As we are
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 267 
 
 Englishmen, the least considerable man among us has an inter- 
 est, equal to the proudest nobleman, in the laws and constitu- 
 tion of his country." 
 
 Chatham. " It was therefore, said he, their [the Peers'] 
 highest interest, as well as their duty, to watch over and guard 
 the people ; for when the people had lost their rights, those of 
 the peerage would soon become insignificant. To argue from 
 experience, he begged leave to refer their Lordships to a most 
 important passage in history, described by a man of great abil- 
 ities, Dr. Robertson. This writer, in his life of Charles the 
 Fifth (a great, ambitious, wicked man), informs us, that the 
 Peers of Castile were so far cajoled and seduced by him, as 
 to join him in overturning thai part of the Cortes, which 
 represented the People." 
 
 Junius says, " I am persuaded you will not leave it to the 
 choice of seven hundred persons [Parliament], notoriously cor- 
 rupted by the crown, whether seven millions of their equals 
 shall be freemen or slaves." — " Without insisting upon the ex- 
 travagant concessions made to Henry the Eighth, there are in- 
 stances, in the history of other countries, of a formal, delibe- 
 rate surrender of the public liberty into the hands of the sove- 
 reign" 
 
 Chatham. "They [the' Peers of Castile] were weak 
 enough to adopt, and base enough to be flattered with an ex- 
 pectation, that, by assisting their master in this iniquitous pur- 
 pose, they should increase their own strength and importance. 
 What was the consequence ? They exchanged the constitu- 
 tional authority of Peers, for the titular vanity of Grandees. 
 They were no longer a part of the Parliament, for that they 
 had destroyed ; and when they pretended to have an opinion 
 as Grandees, Charles told them he did not understand it; and 
 naturally enough, when they had surrendered their authority, 
 he treated their advice with contempt. The consequence did 
 not stop here. He made use of the people, whom he had en- 
 slaved, to enslave others, and employed the strength of the 
 Castilians to destroy the rights of their free neighbours of Ar- 
 ragon."
 
 268 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS, 
 
 Junius expresses the result of this precious portion of Span- 
 ish history, in these few words ; " We are the slaves of the 
 House of Commons, and, through them, we are the slaves of 
 the King and his ministers." 
 
 Lord Chatham, continuing the same suhject, says, " Let 
 this example be a lesson to us all. Let us be cautious how 
 we admit an idea, that our rights stand on a footing different 
 from those of the people. Let us be cautious how we invade 
 the liberties of our fellow-subjects, however mean, however 
 remote ; for, be assured, my Lords, that, in whatever part of 
 the empire you suffer slavery to be established, whether it be 
 in America, or in Ireland, or here at home, you will find it a 
 disease which spreads by contact, and soon reaches from the 
 extremities to the heart. The man, who has lost his own 
 freedom, becomes, from that moment, an instrument in the 
 hands of an ambitious prince, to destroy the freedom of others." 
 
 Junius. " We can never be in real danger, until the forms 
 of Parliament are made use of to destroy the substance of our 
 civil and political liberties ; until Parliament itself betrays its 
 trust, by contributing to establish new principles of government, 
 and employing the very weapons committed to it by the collec- 
 tive body, to stab the constitution." (March, 1770.) 
 
 Chatham. " These reflections, my Lords, are but too ap- 
 plicable to our present situation. The liberty of the subject 
 is invaded, not only in provinces, but here at home. The 
 English people are loud in their complaints ; they proclaim, 
 with one voice, the injuries they have received ; they demand 
 redress, and, depend upon it, my Lords, that, one way or oth- 
 er, they will have redress. They will never return to a state 
 of tranquillity until they are redressed ; nor ought they ; for 
 in my judgment, and I speak it boldly, it were better for them 
 to perish in a glorious contention for their rights, than to pur- 
 chase a slavish tranquillity at the expense of a single iota of 
 the constitution." 
 
 Junius says to the King, " 1 confess, sir, I should be con- 
 tented to renounce the forms of the constitution once more, if 
 there were no other way to obtain substantial justice."
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 269 
 
 " The time is come, when the body of the English 
 
 people must assert their own cause. Conscious of their strength, 
 and animated by a sense of their duty, they will not surrender 
 their birth-right to Ministers, Parliaments, or Kings." 
 
 " If an honest, and, I may truly affirm, a laborious 
 
 zeal for the public service, has given me any weight in your 
 esteem, let me exhort and conjure you never to suffer an inva- 
 sion of your political constitution, however minute the instance 
 may appear, to pass by without a determined, persevering re- 
 sistance. One precedent creates another. They soon accu- 
 mulate, and constitute law. What yesterday was fact, to day 
 is doctrine." (Dedication to the English nation.) 
 
 Chatham. " Let me entreat your Lordships, then, in the 
 name of all the duties you owe to your sovereign, to your 
 country, and to yourselves, to perform that office, to which 
 you are called by the constitution, by informing his Majesty 
 truly of the condition of his subjects, and of the real cause of 
 their dissatisfaction. I have considered the matter with most 
 serious attention ; and, as I have not, in my own breast, the 
 smallest doubt, that the present universal discontent of the na- 
 tion arises from the proceedings of the House of Commons 
 upon the expulsion of Mr. Wilkes, I think that we ought, in 
 our address, to state that matter to the King, which I beg leave 
 to submit to the consideration of the House, viz. 
 
 " ' And for these great and essential purposes, we will, with 
 all convenient speed, take into our most serious consideration 
 the causes of the discontents which prevail in so many parts 
 of your Majesty's dominions, and particularly the late pro- 
 ceedings of the House of Commons, touching the incapacity 
 of John Wilkes, Esq. (expelled by that House), to be elected 
 a member to serve in this present Parliament, thereby refusing 
 (by a resolution of one branch of the legislature only) to the 
 subject his common right, and depriving the electors of Mid- 
 dlesex of their free choice of a representative.' : 
 
 Then rose Lord Mansfield and said, " that he had never de- 
 livered any opinion upon the legality of the proceedings of the
 
 270 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 House of Commons on the Middlesex election, nor should he 
 now, notwithstanding any thing that might be expected from 
 him. That he had locked it up in his own breast, and it 
 should die with him." 
 
 Junius to Lord Mansfield. " As a Lord in Parliament, 
 you were repeatedly called upon to condemn or defend the 
 new law declared by the House of Commons. You affected 
 to have scruples, and every expedient was attempted to re- 
 move them. The question was proposed and urged to you in 
 a thousand different shapes. Your prudence still supplied you 
 with evasion ; your resolution was invincible. For my own 
 part, I am not anxious to penetrate this solemn secret. I care 
 not to whose wisdom it is entrusted, nor how soon you carry 
 it with you to your grave." Junius adds, in a note to this pas- 
 sage, " He said, in the House of Lords, that he believed he 
 should carry his opinion with him to the grave." (November 
 24, 1770.) 
 
 As no report of this speech had then been published, Mr. 
 Taylor concludes, that Junius was in the House at the time it 
 was delivered. After Lord Mansfield had finished his elabo- 
 rate but evasive speech, the 
 
 Earl of Chatham arose and said, " My Lords, there is 
 one plain maxim, to which I have invariably adhered through 
 life ; that in every question, in which my liberty or my proper- 
 ty was concerned, I should consult and be determined by the 
 dictates of common sense." Six months prior to this speech, 
 
 Junius, with reference to the same subject, says, " It is a 
 point of fact, on which every English gentleman will determine 
 for himself As to lawyers their profession is supported by 
 the indiscriminate defence of right and wrong ; and I confess 
 I have not that opinion of their knowledge or integrity, to 
 think it necessary that they should decide for me upon a plain 
 constitutional question." (June 22, 1769.) 
 
 Chatham, referring still to Lord Mansfield's subtle speech, 
 said, " I confess,' my Lords, that I am apt to distrust the refine- 
 ments of learning, because I have seen the ablest and most
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 271 
 
 learned men equally liable to deceive themselves, and to mis- 
 lead others. The condition of human nature would be lament- 
 able indeed, if nothing less than the greatest learning and tal- 
 ents, which fall to the share of so small a number of men, 
 were sufficient to direct our judgment and our conduct. But 
 Providence has taken better care of our happiness, and given 
 us, in the simplicity of common sense, a rule for our direction, 
 by which we shall never be mislead." 
 
 Junius. " This proposition is singular enough, and turns 
 upon a refinement very distant from the simplicity of common 
 sense." " Now, my Lord, [to Mansfield] without pretending to 
 reconcile the distinctions of Westminster-hall with the simple 
 information of common sense." To Mr. Printer Wood fall, he 
 says, " The Latin word, simplex, conveys to me an amiable 
 character, and never denotes folly." 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords, I must beg the indulgence of the 
 House. Neither will my health permit me, nor do I pretend 
 to be qualified, to follow that learned Lord [Mansfield] minute- 
 ly through the whole of his argument. No man is better ac- 
 quainted with his abilities and learning, nor has a greater 
 respect for them, than I have. I have had the pleasure of sit- 
 ting with him in the other house, and always listened to him 
 with attention. I have not now lost a word of what he said, 
 
 NOR DID I EVER." 
 
 In this debate, Mr. Taylor remarks, that Junius not only 
 felt like Lord Chatham on this particular subject, but address- 
 ed Lord Mansfield in nearly similar terms ; yet he never sus- 
 pected that two characters were acted by the same person in 
 different scenes. 
 
 Junius says to the Lord Chief Justice. " In public affairs, 
 my Lord, cunning, let it be ever so well wrought, will not con- 
 duct a man honorably through life. Like bad money, it may 
 be current for a time, but it will soon be cried down. It 
 cannot consist with a liberal spirit, though it be sometimes 
 united with extraordinary qualifications. When I acknowl- 
 edge your abilities, you may believe I am sincere. I feel for
 
 272 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 human nature, when I see a man, so gifted as you are, descend 
 to such vile practices. Yet do not suffer your vanity to console 
 you too soon. Believe me, my good Lord, you are not ad- 
 mired in the same degree in which you are detested. It is 
 only the partiality of your friends, that balances the defects of 
 your heart with the superiority of your understanding." Again, 
 " Junius never pretends to be a better lawyer than Lord 
 Mansfield ; on the contrary, he takes every opportunity to ac- 
 knowledge the superior learning and abilities of that wicked 
 judge." (Philo-Junius.) 
 
 There certainly is something very much resembling envy, if 
 not hatred, in Lord Chatham's treatment of Lord Mansfield ; 
 else why indulge in such bitter invectives, such mortifying sar- 
 casms, against the head officer of the English judicatory. He 
 continued it to his last breath in the House of Peers, when, 
 casting his eyes on Mansfield, he glanced at the Scotch rebel- 
 lion. In like manner Junius employs the last stroke of his 
 pen in writing this maledictory sentence. " Considering the 
 situation and abilities of Lord Mansfield, I do not scruple to 
 affirm, with the most solemn appeal to God for my sincerity, 
 that, in my judgment, he is the very worst and most dangerous 
 man in the kingdom. Thus have I done my duty in endeav- 
 ouring to bring him to punishment. But mine is an inferior 
 ministerial office in the temple of justice. / have bound the 
 victim and dragged him to the altar." * 
 
 * Our countryman, Copley, must have thought of these things, when 
 he painted apathy, personified in the likeness of Lord Mansfield, in his 
 famous picture of " the death o/Lord Chatham," — the only unmoved 
 countenance in the whole group. 
 
 We cannot judge of the feelings of Lord Chatham towards that 
 great law character ; but Dr. Bisset, whose partiality to the Scotch is 
 apparent in his history of George the Third, says, " that a reader, who 
 should know the origin, principles, and history of the American war, 
 without having attended to parliamentary debates and speeches, would 
 learn with surprise, that a most strenuous abetter of coercive measures, 
 a determined enemy to every plan of a conciliatory spirit, a supporter of 
 unconditional submission, and a prophesier of speedy subjugation, was
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 273 
 
 Chatham. " The constitution of this country has been 
 openly invaded in fact, and / have heard with horror and 
 astonishment that very invasion defended upon principle. 
 What is this mysterious power, undefined by law, unknown to 
 the subject, which we must not approach without awe, nor 
 speak of without reverence, which no man may question and to 
 which all men must submit ? " 
 
 Junius. " The known laws of the land, the rights of the 
 subject, the sanctity of charters, and the reverence due to our 
 magistrates, must all give way, without question or resistance, 
 to a privilege, of which no man knows either the origin or 
 extent.'''' 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords [still referring to Lord Mansfield, 
 then sitting as Lord Chancellor], I thought the slavish doctrine 
 of passive obedience had long since been exploded ; and, when 
 our kings were obliged to confess, that their title to the crown 
 and the rule of their government had no other foundation than 
 the known laws of the land, I never expected to hear a divine 
 right or a divine infallibility attributed to any other branch of 
 the legislature. My Lords, I beg to be understood. No man 
 respects the House of Commons more than I do, or would 
 contend more strenuously than I would, to preserve them their 
 just and legal authority. Within the bounds prescribed by the 
 constitution, that authority is necessary to the well-being of 
 
 Lord Mansfield." If so, it is no wonder that the Earl ofChatham 
 detested him, and that Junius dragged him bound to the altar for 
 Lord Camden to sacrifice the British JJhitophel. 
 
 Dr. Bisset proceeds thus ; " Such powers of argument in cases of 
 momentous import, drawing conclusions from insufficient information 
 and erroneous principles ; such profound wisdom, sanctioning the meas- 
 ures, decrees, and acts of misinformation, precipitancy, and violence, 
 afford a striking instance of the weakness which, from the imperfec- 
 tion of human nature, is often intermingled with the most exalted qual- 
 ities ; it teaches the rcasoner in drawing his inferences, and the coun- 
 sellor in forming his schemes, not to place implicit reliance on either 
 the authority or example of even an illustrious sage." — History of 
 George the Third, Vol. II. p. 327. London edition. 
 
 35
 
 274 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the people ; beyond that line, every exertion of power is ar- 
 bitrary, is illegal ; it threatens tyranny to the people and de- 
 struction to the state. Power without right is the most odious 
 and detestable object that can the offered to he human imagi- 
 nation ; it is not only pernicious to those who are subject to it, 
 but tends to its own destruction. It is what my noble friend 
 [Lord Lyttleton] has truly described it, Res detestabilis et ca- 
 duca" — " I acknowledge the just power, and reverence the 
 constitution, of the House of Commons. It is for their own 
 sakes that I would prevent their assuming a power which the 
 constitution has denied them, lest by grasping at an authority 
 they have no right to, they should forfeit that which they le- 
 gally possess." 
 
 Junius. " In my opinion, you grasp at the imposssible, and 
 lose the really attainable. 
 
 Chatham. " I affirm that they have betrayed their con- 
 stituents and violated the constitution." 
 
 Junius. Let the people " determine by their conduct at 
 a future election, whether or no it be in reality the general 
 sense of the nation, that their rights have been arbitrarily in- 
 vaded by the present Home of Commons, and the constitution 
 betrayed.' 1 '' 
 
 Chatham. " Under pretence of declaring the law, they 
 have made a law, and united in the same persons the office 
 of legislator and judge.'''' 
 
 Junius says, that " Parliament presumed to make a law 
 under pretence of declaring it," and pronounces it " a law in 
 pretence declared, in reality made. Legislation and juris- 
 diction are united in the same persons, and exercised at the 
 same moment ; and a court, from which there is no appeal, as- 
 sumes an original jurisdiction in a criminal case." 
 
 Junius continues, — " The crime, like the punishment, was 
 in their own bosoms. They were ex post facto legislators. 
 They were parties ; they were judges ; and instead of a court 
 of final adjudicature, acted as a court of criminal jurisdiction 
 in the first instance."
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 275 
 
 Chatham. " The noble Lord seems fond of the word ju- 
 risdiction, and, I confess, with the force and effect which he 
 has given it, it is a word of copious meaning and wonderful 
 extent." — " My Lords, we knew that jurisdiction was nothing 
 more than jus dicere, ; we knew, that legem facere and legem 
 dicere were powers clearly distinguished from each other in 
 the nature of things, and wisely separated by the wisdom of 
 the English constitution ; but now it seems we must adopt a 
 new system of thinking. The House of Commons, we are 
 told, have a supreme jurisdiction ; and there is no appeal from 
 their sentence; and that, wherever they are competent judges, 
 their decision must he received and submitted to as, ipso facto, 
 the laiv of the land." 
 
 Junius. " You have hitherto maintained, that the House 
 of Commons are the sole judges of their oivn privileges, and 
 that their declaration does, ipso facto, constitute the law of Par- 
 liament." 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords, J am a plain man, and have been 
 brought up in a religious reverence for the original simplicity 
 of the laws of England." 
 
 Junius on the same subject. " Is this the law of Parlia- 
 ment, or is it not ? / am a plain man, Sir, and cannot follow 
 you through the phlegmatic forms of an oration." And again, 
 referring to the same part of Lord Mansfield's speech, to 
 which Chatham alludes, he adds, " Suffer me, for I am a 
 plain, unlettered man, to continue the style of interrogation, 
 which suits my capacity." 
 
 Chatham. " By what sophistry they [the laws of Eng- 
 land] have been perverted, by what artifices they have been 
 involved in obscurity, is not for me to explain. The principles, 
 however, of the English laws are still sufficiently clear ; they 
 are founded in reason, and are the master-piece of the human 
 understanding ; but it is in the text that I would look for a di- 
 rection to my judgment, not in the commentaries of modern 
 professors. The noble Lord assures us, that he knows not in 
 what code the law of Parliament is to be found ; thai the
 
 276 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 House of Commons, when they act as judges, have no law to 
 direct them but their oivn wisdom ; that their decision is law ; 
 and if they determine wrong, the subject has no appeal but to 
 Heaven. What then, my Lords, are all the generous efforts 
 of our ancestors, are all those glorious contentions by which 
 they meant to secure to themselves, and to transmit to their 
 posterity a known law, — a certain rule of living, reduced to 
 this conclusion, that instead of the arbitrary power of a king, 
 we must submit to the arbitrary power of an House of Com- 
 mons ? If this be true, what benefit do we derive from the 
 exchange ? Tyranny, my Lords, is detestable in every shape ; 
 but in none so formidable as when it is assumed and exercised 
 by a number of tyrants. But, my Lords, this is not the fact; 
 this is not the constitution ; we have a law of Parliament ; we 
 have a code, in which every honest man may find it. We 
 have Magna Charta ; we have the Statute Book, and the 
 Bill of Rights. 
 
 Junius. " The House of Commons judge of their own 
 privileges without appeal : — They may take offence at the 
 most innocent action, and imprison the person who offends 
 them during their arbitrary will and pleasure. The party has 
 no remedy. He cannot appeal from their jurisdiction ; and if 
 he question the privilege which he is supposed to have vio- 
 lated, it becomes an aggravation of his offence. Surely, Sir, this 
 doctrine is not to be found in Magna Charta. If it be ad- 
 mitted without limitation, 1 affirm that there is neither law nor 
 liberty in this kingdom. We are the slaves of the House of 
 Commons, and through them, we are the slaves of the King 
 and his ministers.'''' — " The people will grow weary of their 
 condition, and surrender every thing into the King's hands, 
 rather than submit to be trampled on any longer by five hun- 
 dred of their equals." 
 
 " The power of the legislature is limited, not only 
 
 by the general principles of natural justice and the welfare of the 
 community, but by the forms and principles of our particular 
 constitution. If this doctrine be not true, we must admit, that
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 277 
 
 King, Lords, and Commons, have no rule to direct their resolu- 
 tions but merely their own will and pleasure. They might unite 
 the legislative and executive power' in the same hands, and dis- 
 solve the constitution by an act of Parliament. But I am per- 
 suaded you will not leave it to the choice of seven hundred 
 persons, notoriously corrupted by the crown, whether seven 
 millions of their equals shall he freemen or slaves." 
 
 Mr. Taylor remarks, that the first of these paragraphs could 
 only proceed from some person who heard the speech, and 
 took notes which would furnish him with this correct transcript 
 of it more than a year after. 
 
 Chatham. " What security would they [the people] have 
 for their rights, if once they admitted, that a court of judicature 
 might determine every question that came before it, not by any 
 known positive laiv, but by the vague, indeterminate, arbitrary 
 rule, of what the noble Lord is pleased to call ' the wisdom 
 of the court ? ' " 
 
 Junius, on the same occasion, says to Lord Mansfield, — 
 " Instead of those certain, positive rules, by which the judg- 
 ment of a court of law should invariably be determined, you 
 have fondly introduced your own unsettled notions of equity 
 and substantial justice. Decisions given upon such principles 
 do not alarm the public so much as they ought, because the 
 consequence and tendency of each particular instance is not 
 observed or regarded. In the mean time the practice gains 
 ground ; the Court of King's Bench becomes a court of equity, 
 and the judge, instead of consulting strictly the law of the 
 land, refers only to the wisdom of the court and the purity of 
 his own conscience." 
 
 Chatham. " With respect to the decision of the courts of 
 justice, I am far from denying them their due weight and au- 
 thority, yet, placing them in the most respectable view, I still 
 consider them, not as law, but as an evidence of the law ; 
 and before they can arrive even at that degree of authority, it 
 must appear, that they are founded in, and confirmed by, 
 reason ; that they are supported by precedents, taken from
 
 278 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 good and moderate times ; that they do not contradict any- 
 positive law ; that they are submitted to without reluctance by 
 the people ; that they are unquestioned by the legislature 
 (which* is equivalent to a tacit confirmation) ; and, what, in my 
 judgment, is by far the most important, that they do not vio- 
 late the spirit of the constitution. My Lords, this is not a 
 vague or loose expression ; we all know what the constitution 
 is ; we all know that the first principle of it is, that the subject 
 shall not be governed by the arbitrium of any one man or 
 body of men (less than the whole legislature), but by certain 
 laws, to which he has virtually given his consent, which are 
 open to him to examine, and not beyond his ability to under- 
 stand. Now, my Lords, I affirm, and am ready to maintain, 
 that the late decision of the House of Commons, upon the Mid- 
 dlesex election, is destitute of every one of those properties and 
 conditions which I hold to be essential to the legality of such a 
 decision. It is not founded in reason ; for it carries with it a 
 contradiction, that the representative should perform the office 
 of the constituent body. It is not supported by a single prece- 
 dent ; for the case of Sir Robert Walpole is but a half prece- 
 dent, and even that half is imperfect." 
 
 Junius, about six months before this speech, makes the 
 same remarks on the Middlesex question. " I do not mean 
 to admit, that the late resolution of the House of Commons is 
 defensible on general principles of reason, any more than in 
 law." — " There is no statute existing, by which that specific 
 disability which we speak of is created." — " There is no prece- 
 dent, in all the proceedings of the House of Commons, which 
 comes entirely home to the present case." — " He takes ad- 
 vantage eagerly of the first resolution, by which Mr. Walpole's 
 incapacity is declared ; but as to the two following, by which 
 the candidate with the fewest votes was declared not duly 
 elected, and the election itself vacated, I dare say he Avould be 
 well satisfied if they were for ever blotted out of the journals 
 of the House of Commons. In fair argument, no part of a 
 precedent should be admitted, unless the whole of it be given
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 279 
 
 us together. The author has divided his precedent, for he 
 knew that, if taken together, it produced a consequence di- 
 rectly the reverse of that which he endeavours to draw from 
 a vote of expulsion." 
 
 Chatham. " Incapacity was indeed declared, hut his crimes 
 are stated as the ground of the resolution, and his opponent 
 was declared, to be not duly elected, even after his incapacity 
 was established." 
 
 Junius. " Now, Sir, to my understanding no proposition of 
 this kind can be more evident, than that the House of Commons, 
 by their vote, themselves understood, and meant to declare, 
 that Mr. WalpoWs incapacity arose from the crimes he had 
 committed, not from the punishment the House annexed to 
 them. — They respected the rights of the people, while they 
 asserted their own. They did not infer, from Mr. Walpole's 
 incapacity, that his opponent was duly elected ; on the con- 
 trary, they declared Mr. Taylor * not duly elected, and the 
 election itself void. — The present House of Commons have 
 neither statute, nor custom, nor reason, nor one single prece- 
 dent to support them." 
 
 Chatham. " It contradicts Magna Charta and the Bill of 
 liights, by which it is provided, that no subject shall be de- 
 prived of his freehold, unless by the judgment of his peers or 
 the law of the land ; and that elections of members to serve 
 in Parliament shall be free ; and so far is this decision from 
 being submitted to by the people, that they have taken the 
 strongest measures, and adopted the most positive language, to 
 express their discontent. Whether it will be questioned by 
 the legislature, will depend upon your Lordship's resolution ; 
 but that it violates the spirit of the constitution, wdl, I think, 
 be disputed by no man, who has heard this day's debate, and 
 who wishes well to the freedom of the country." 
 
 Junius. " He not only betrays his master, but violates the 
 spirit of the English constitution." — " How long, and to what 
 
 * The name of the member opposed to Walpole.
 
 280 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 extent, a King of England may be protected by the forms, 
 when he violates the spirit of the constitution, deserves to be 
 considered." 
 
 Chatham. " Yet, if we are to believe the noble Lord, this 
 great grievance, this manifest violation of the first principles of 
 the constitution, will not admit of a remedy ; is not even ca- 
 pable of redress, unless we appeal at once to Heaven." 
 
 Junius. " Far from discovering a spirit bold enough to in- 
 vade the first rights of the people, and the first principles of 
 the constitution.''' 1 — " But when I see questions of the highest 
 national importance carried, as they have been, and the first 
 principles of the constitution openly violated, without argument 
 or decency, I confess I give up the cause in despair." 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords, I have better hopes of the consti- 
 tution, and a firmer confidence in the wisdom and constitution- 
 al authority of this House. It is to your ancestors, my Lords, — 
 it is to the English barons, that we are indebted for the laws 
 and constitution we possess. Their virtues were rude and un- 
 cultivated, but they were great and sincere. Their understand- 
 ings were as little polished as their manners, but they had 
 hearts to distinguish right from wrong ; they had heads to dis- 
 tinguish truth from falsehood ; they understood the rights of 
 humanity, and they had spirit to maintain them." 
 
 Junius. " Their speech is rude, but intelligible ; their ges- 
 tures fierce, but full of explanation. Perplexed by sophistries, 
 their honest eloquence rises into action. The first appeal 
 was to the integrity of their representatives ; the second to the 
 King's justice ; the last argument of the people, whenever they 
 have recourse to it, will carry more, perhaps, than persuasion 
 to the Parliament, or supplication to the throne." 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords, I. think that history has not done 
 justice to their [the barons'] conduct, when they obtained from 
 their sovereign that great acknowledgment of national rights 
 contained in Magna Charta ; they did not confine it to them- 
 selves alone, but delivered it as a common blessing to the whole 
 people. They did not say, These are the rights of the great
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 281 
 
 barons, or, These are the rights of the great prelates. No, my 
 Lords, they said, in the simple Latin of the times, JVullus liber 
 homo* and provided as carefully for the meanest subject as 
 for the greatest. These are uncouth words, and sound but 
 poorly in the ears of scholars ; neither are they addressed 
 to the criticism of scholars, but to the hearts of freemen. 
 These three words, nullus liber homo, have a meaning which 
 interests us all ; they deserve to be remembered ; they deserve 
 to be inculcated in our minds ; they are worth all the classics. 
 Let us not, then, degenerate from the glorious example of our 
 ancestors. Those iron barons,\ for so I may call them, when 
 compared with the silken barons of modern days, were the 
 guardians of the people." 
 
 Junius. "When the bloody Barrington, that silken, fawn- 
 ing courtier at St. James's." 
 
 After reading the preceding argumentative paragraphs, from 
 the speeches of Lord Chatham and the Letters of Junius, can 
 we doubt of their flowing from the same intellectual fountain ? 
 
 Lord Chatham speaks slightingly of those who assume airs on 
 account of their rank as noblemen, and the writer of the Let- 
 ters holds them in the like estimation. 
 
 Junius. " At the same time that I think it good policy to 
 pay those compliments to Lord Chatham which, in truth, he 
 has nobly deserved, I should be glad to mortify those contempt- 
 ible creatures who call themselves noblemen, whose worthless im- 
 portance depends entirely upon their influence over boroughs.'''' 
 
 Chatham. " Yet their virtues [the barons'] were never en- 
 gaged in a question of such' importance as the present. A 
 breach has been made in the constitution ; the battlements are 
 dismantled ; the citadel is open to the first invader ; the walls 
 totter ; the constitution is not tenable. What remains, then, but 
 for us to be foremost in the breach, to repair it, or perish in it ? 
 
 * No freeman. 
 
 f Baron, from haro, means emphatically a man, or vir of the Latins ; 
 hence the sarcasm, silken barons. 
 
 36
 
 282 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 " Great pains have been taken to alarm us with the conse- 
 quences of a difference between the two Houses of Parliament ; 
 that the House of Commons will resent our daring to advise 
 the crown, and never forgive us for attempting to save the 
 state. I am sensible of the importance and difficulty of this 
 great crisis. At a moment such as this, we are called upon to 
 do our duty, without dreading the resentment of any man. 
 But if apprehensions of this kind are to affect us, let us con- 
 sider which we ought to respect most, the representative or 
 the collective body of the people. My Lords, five hundred 
 gentlemen are not ten millions ; and if we must have a con- 
 tention, let us take care to have the English nation on our side. 
 If this question be given up, the freeholders of England are 
 reduced to a condition baser than the peasantry of Poland. If 
 they desert their own cause they deserve to be slaves ! My 
 Lords, this is not merely the cold opinion of my understanding, 
 hut the glowing expression of what I feel. It is my heart 
 that speaks. I know I speak warmly ; but this warmth shall 
 never betray my argument nor my temper. The kingdom is 
 in aflame ! " 
 
 Junius. " The formality of a well repeated lesson is wide- 
 ly distant from the animated expression of the heart." — " For- 
 give this passionate language. I am unable to correct it. It 
 is the language of my heart. 
 
 Chatham. " As mediators between the king and people, it 
 is our duty to represent to him the true condition and temper 
 of his subjects. It is a duty which no particular respects 
 should hinder us from performing ; and whenever his Majesty 
 shall demand our advice, it will then be our duty to inquire 
 more minutely into the causes of present discontents. When- 
 ever that inquiry shall come on, I pledge myself to the House 
 to prove, that, since the first institution of the House of Com- 
 mons, not a single precedent can' be produced to justify their 
 late proceedings. My noble and learned friend, the Lord 
 Chancellor (Camden), has pledged himself to the House, that 
 he will support that assertion."
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 033 
 
 [" Next to Lord Temple, the most intimate political as well 
 as private friend of Lord Chatham was Lord Camden. It 
 does not appear, that the friendship which subsisted between 
 them was at any time interrupted. The bond of gratitude, 
 which unites one statesman to another, is, in general, supposed 
 to be weak. In the present instance it was strong and lasting 
 to the end of life ; for Lord Camden was one of the executors 
 of Chatham's last will and testament." *] 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords, the character and circumstances 
 of Mr. Wilkes have been very improperly introduced into this 
 question, not only here, but in that court of judicature where 
 his cause was tried ; I mean the House of Commons. With 
 one party he was a patriot of the first magnitude ; with the 
 other the vilest incendiary. For my oivn part, I consider him 
 merely and indifferently as an English subject, possessed of 
 certain rights which the laws have given him, and which the 
 laws alone can take from him. I am neither moved by his 
 private vices nor by his public merits. In his person, though he 
 were the worst of men, 1 contend for the safety and the security 
 of the best ; and God forbid, my Lords, that there should be a 
 power in this country of measuring the civil rights of the sub- 
 ject by his moral character, or by any other rule but the fixed 
 laws of the land.'''' 
 
 Junius, nine months before this speech, advocates the cause 
 of Wilk§s on the same ground, and in language so little dissim- 
 ilar, that we are constrained, says Mr. Taylor, to believe that 
 he had a hand in the above. " For my own part," says he, 
 " I am proud to affirm, that, if I had been weak enough to 
 form such a friendship, 1 would never have been base enough 
 to betray it. But let Mr. Wilkes's character be what it may, 
 this is at least certain, that circumstanced as he is ivith regard 
 to the public, even his vices plead for him. The people of 
 England have too much discernment to suffer your Grace 
 [Duke of Grafton] to take advantage of the failings of a pri- 
 
 * Thackeray.
 
 284 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 vate character, to establish a precedent by which the public lib- 
 erty is affected, and which you may hereafter, with equal ease 
 and satisfaction, employ to ruin the best men of the kingdom." 
 — " But the laws of England shall not be violated, even by 
 your holy zeal to oppress a sinner ; and though you have suc- 
 ceeded in making him the tool, you shall not make him the 
 victim of your ambition." 
 
 Chatham. " I believe, my Lords, I shall not be suspected 
 of any personal partiality to this unhappy man." 
 
 Junius, in a private letter to Mr. Wilkes, in reply to one 
 in which he complains of Junius's bad opinion of hinf, says, 
 " Think no more of what is passed. You did not then stand 
 so well in my opinion ; and it was necessary to the plan of 
 that Letter to rate you lower than you deserved. The wound 
 is curable, and the scar shall be no disgrace to you." — (Pri- 
 vate Letter, No. lxx.) 
 
 Chatham. " I am now suspected of coming forward, in 
 the decline of life, in the anxious pursuit of wealth and power, 
 which it is impossible for me to enjoy. Be it so ; there is 
 one ambition which I ever will acknowledge, which I will 
 not renounce but ivith my life. It is the ambition of deliver- 
 ing to my posterity those rights of freedom which I have re- 
 ceived from my ancestors.'''' 
 
 Junius. " We owe it to our ancestors to preserve entire 
 those rights which they have delivered to our care. .We owe 
 it to our posterity not to suffer their dearest inheritance to be 
 destroyed." 
 
 Chatham. " / am not now pleading the cause of an in- 
 dividual, but of every freeholder in England." 
 
 Junius. " Be assured that the laws, which protect us in 
 our civil rights, grow out of the constitution, and that they 
 must fall or nourish with it. This is not the cause of a fac- 
 tion, or of a party, or of any individual, but the common in- 
 terest of every man in Britain." 
 
 Chatham. ' ; It is possible, my Lords, that the inquiry I 
 speak of, may lead us to advise his Majesty to dissolve the
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 285 
 
 present Parliament ; nor have I any doubt of our right to give 
 that advice, if we should think it necessary. His Majesty will 
 then determine whether he will yield to the united petitions of 
 the people of England, or maintain the House of Commons in 
 the exercise of a legislative power, which heretofore abolished 
 the House of Lords and overturned the monarchy.'''' 
 
 Junius. By depriving 1 a subject of his birth-right, they 
 have attributed to their own vote an authority equal to an act 
 of the whole legislature ; and, though perhaps not with the 
 same motives, have strictly followed the example of the long Par- 
 liament, which first declared the regcd office useless, and soon af- 
 ter, with as little ceremony, dissolved the House of Lords. The 
 same pretended power, which robs an English subject of his 
 birth-right, may rob an English King of his crown" 
 
 Chatham. " I willingly "acquit the present House of Com- 
 mons of having actually formed so detestable a design ; but 
 they cannot themselves foresee to what excesses they may be 
 carried hereafter ; and, for my own part, / should be sorry to 
 trust to their future moderation. Unlimited power is apt to 
 corrupt the minds of those who possess it ; and this I know, 
 that where law ends, tyranny begins ! " 
 
 Junius. " Versed, as your Majesty undoubtedly is, in Eng- 
 lish history, it cannot easily escape you, how much it is your 
 interest, as well as your duty, to prevent one of the three es- 
 tates from encroaching upon the province of the other two, or 
 assuming the authority of them all. When once they have 
 departed from the great constitutional line, by which all their 
 proceedings should be directed, who ivill answer for their fu- 
 ture moderation ? Or what assurance will they give you, that, 
 when they have trampled upon their equals, they will submit to 
 a superior? Your Majesty may learn hereafter how nearly the 
 slave and tyrant are allied." 
 
 " In the last two extracts, the train of thought," says Mr. 
 Taylor, " pursued by Junius, is that which Lord Chatham 
 afterwards followed. Nor is it only in the line of argument 
 that we may observe this similarity ; the speech verbally resem-
 
 2S6 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HI'S LETTERS. 
 
 oles the composition of Junius. Another particular, in which 
 the speech and the extracts remarkably agree, is in the pro- 
 phetic announcement of the dangerous consequences which 
 might ensue to the King, from maintaining and abetting the 
 House of Commons in the exercise of an unlawful degree of 
 power. This possible stretch of authority, it has been already 
 observed, was assumed on a memorable occasion, when Sir 
 Philip Francis, in his own person, protested against it with 
 as much energy and consistency, as if he had spoken in the 
 name of Lord Chatham, or written under that of Junius." 
 
 With this striking similarity in words, sentiments, and compo- 
 sition, the laborious compiler of " Junius Identified,'''' never 
 once thought that Chatham and Junius were two titles for the 
 same .person ! * 
 
 Here end the parallel passages 'of a celebrated speech 'of 
 Lord Chatham on the ninth of January, 1770, respecting the 
 conduct of the House of Commons in the expulsion of John 
 Wilkes, Esq., and certain portions of the letters of Junius on 
 the same subject. They were selected by Mr. Taylor to 
 prove, from the similarity of language and consftnilitude of sen- 
 timent between the Speech and the Letters, that Sir Philip 
 Francis, who was the reporter of the former, was actually the 
 author of the Letters ; while we adduce the comparison as evi- 
 dence of the Letters being the production of Chatham him- 
 self 
 
 Only three weeks intervened between the date of the fa- 
 mous Letter of Junius to King George the Third, and the 
 delivery of the foregoing speech. 
 
 * It is most earnestly to be wished, that our young gentlemen, going 
 through a course of public education, would study ardently the abili- 
 ties and character of Lord Chatham in his parliamentary speeches 
 and conduct, instead of imitating the false eloquence of the Hibernian 
 school, with which too marly are enraptured and* corrupted. While 
 aiming at the height of Chatham's excellence, some might happily im- 
 bibe his ever-during moral and political principles.
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 287 
 
 The consimilarity of sentiment, train of thought, and even 
 phraseology, discernible in passages from certain speeches 
 of Lord Chatham, • compared with portions of Junius on the 
 same subjects, are so adapted to the support of our hy- 
 pothesis, that we shall risk the patience of the reader by 
 calling his attention, as farther evidence, to another speech of 
 the English Demosthenes, delivered thirteen days after the 
 preceding one. 
 
 On the twenty-second of January, 1770, the Marquis of 
 Rockingham moved, in the House of Lords, for fixing a day 
 to take into consideration the state of the nation. 
 
 The object of the Marquis's speech was to show, that the 
 then unhappy condition of affairs, and the universal discontent 
 of the people, did not arise from any immediate temporary 
 cause, but had grown upon them by degrees from the moment 
 of his Majesty's accession to the throne ; that the persons in 
 whom his Majesty then confided had introduced a total change 
 in the old system of English government ; that they had adopt- 
 ed a maxim which must prove fatal to the liberties of the 
 country, viz. that the royal prerogative alone was sufficient to 
 support government, to whatever hands the administration should 
 be committed ; that he could trace the operation of this prin- 
 ciple through every act of government since the accession, in 
 which those persons could be supposed to have any influence. 
 He said, that the first exertion of the prerogative was to make 
 a peace contrary to the ivishes of the nation, and on terms total- 
 ly disproportioned to the successes of the tear ; but as they felt 
 themselves unequal to the conduct of the war, they thought a 
 peace, on any conditions, necessary for their own security and 
 permanence in administration. He then took notice of certain 
 odious, tyrannical acts of power, by which an approbation of 
 the peace had been obtained, and mentioned the genera] sweep 
 through every branch and department of administration ; the 
 removals not merely confined to the higher employments, but 
 carried down to the lowest offices of the state ; to men who 
 had subsisted with their families on salaries from fifty to two
 
 288 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 hundred pounds a year, turned out to misery and ruin, to 
 create a new set of voters and parasites. 
 
 The Duke of Grafton spoke next after the Marquis upon a 
 number of little things in his desultory and confused manner, 
 and Lord Chatham concurred with the motion, and then spoke 
 of that condition of things which, he said, was corrupting the 
 very foundation of their political existence, and preying upon 
 the vitals of the state. 
 
 Chatham said, " If the King's servants will not permit a 
 constitutional question to be decided on according to the forms 
 of the constitution, it must be decided in some other manner ; 
 and rather than it should be given up, rather than the nation 
 should surrender their birth-right to a despotic minister, he 
 hoped, old as he was, to see the question brought to issue, and 
 fairly tried between the people and the government." 
 
 Junius, on the same topic, has the same expression. " The 
 time is come, when the body of the English people must as- 
 sert their own cause. Conscious of their strength, and ani- 
 mated by a sense of their duty, they will not surrender their 
 birth-right to ministers, parliaments, or kings." — " Every meas- 
 ure of government opens an ample field for a parliamentary in- 
 quisition. If this resource should fail us, our next and latest ap- 
 peal must be made to Heaven." 
 
 Chatham. " My Lords, this is not the language of faction; 
 let it be tried by that criterion, by which alone we can dis- 
 tinguish what is factious from what is not, — by the principles 
 of the English constitution. I have been bred up in those prin- 
 ciples, and know, that, when the liberty of the subject is in- 
 vaded, and all redress denied him, resistance is justified. If I 
 had a doubt upon the matter, I should follow the example set 
 us by the most reverend bench, with whom I believe it is a 
 maxim, when any doubt in point of faith arises, or any ques- 
 tion of controversy is started, to appeal at once to the Holy 
 Bible. The constitution has its political bible, by which, if it 
 be fairly consulted, every political question may and ought to 
 be determined. Magna Charta, the Petition of Rights, and
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 289 
 
 the Bill of Rights form that code which I call the Bible of the 
 English constitution. 
 
 Junius has the same singular cast of thought. "The civil 
 constitution, too, that legal liherty, that general creed which 
 every Englishman professes, may still be supported, though 
 Wilkes, and Home, and TWnshend, and Sawbridge should 
 obstinately refuse to communicate ; and even if the Fathers of 
 the Church, if Savile, Richmond, Camden, Rockingham, and 
 Chatham,* should disagree in the ceremonies of their political 
 worship, and even in the interpretation of twenty texts in Mag- 
 na Charta." 
 
 Chatham. " Had some of his Majesty's unhappy prede- 
 cessors trusted less to the comments of their ministers, had they 
 been better read in the text itself, the glorious revolution 
 would have remained only possible in theory, and would not 
 now have existed upon record, a formidable example to their 
 successors." 
 
 Junius calls the decapitation of Charles the First a " glorious 
 act of substantial justice," and glances at it repeatedly, even in 
 his Letter to the King. 
 
 Chatham. " I cannot agree with the noble Duke, that 
 nothing less than an immediate attack upon the honor or inter- 
 est of this nation can authorize us to interpose in defence of 
 weaker states, and in stopping the enterprises of an ambitious 
 neighbour. Whenever that narrow, selfish policy has prevail- 
 ed in our councils, we have constantly experienced the fatal ef- 
 fects of it. By suffering our natural enemies to oppress the 
 powers less able than we are to make resistance, we have per- 
 mitted them to increase their strength, we have lost the most 
 favorable opportunities of opposing them with success, and 
 found ourselves, at last, obliged to run every hazard in making 
 that cause our own, in which we were not wise enough to take 
 
 * Sir Philip Francis almost worshipped the Earl of Chatham. Had 
 he been Junius, would he have placed his idol last of the Fathers, when 
 in truth he was the first ? 
 
 37
 
 290 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 t 
 
 part, while the expense and danger might have heen supported 
 by others. With respect to Corsica, I shall only say, that 
 France has obtained a more useful and important acquisition 
 in one pacific campaign, than in any of her belligerent cam- 
 paigns ; at least while I had the honor of administering the 
 war against her." 
 
 Junius. " If, instead of disowning Lord Shelburne [Secre- 
 tary of State, who gave instructions to Lord Rochford, then 
 English minister at Paris], the British court had interposed with 
 dignity and firmness, you know that Corsica would never have 
 been invaded. The French saw the weakness of a distracted 
 ministry, and were justified in treating you with contempt. 
 They would probably have yielded in the first instance, rather 
 than hazard a rupture with this country ; but being once en- 
 gaged, they cannot retreat without dishonor. Common sense 
 foresees consequences, which have escaped your Grace's pen- 
 etration.* Either we suffer the French to make an acquisition, 
 the importance of which you have probably no conception of; 
 or we oppose them by an underhand management, which only 
 disgraces us in the eyes of Europe, without answering any 
 purpose of policy or prudence. From secret, indirect assis- 
 tance, a transition to some more open, decisive measures be- 
 comes unavoidable ; till at last we find ourselves principals in 
 the war, and are obliged to hazard every thing for an object 
 which might have originally been obtained without expense or 
 danger ." 
 
 Here the words, sentiments, and train of thought exactly 
 accord with Lord Chatham, although Junius anticipated his 
 Lordship by several months. Now, if our hypothesis do not 
 absolutely blind us, nay, stupefy us, what we have here tran- 
 scribed approaches to. demonstration. As it regards the in- 
 dustrious compiler, Mr. Taylor, it shows how near men some- 
 
 * Letter to the Duke of Grafton, May 30, 1769. Lord Rochford 
 was a character, next after Lord Camden, of whom Junius speaks 
 with unmingled praise.
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 291 
 
 times come to a discovery, and yet miss it. It has been so 
 with some of the most useful inventions. Shall I, at this late 
 period of my life, add to the number of the hypothetically 
 blind? 
 
 Chatham. "My Lords, the condition of his Majesty's af- 
 fairs in Ireland, and the state of that kingdom within itself, will 
 undoubtedly make a very material part of your Lordships' in- 
 quiry. I am not sufficiently informed to enter into the subject 
 so fully as I could wish ; but by what appears to the public, 
 and from my own observation, I confess I cannot give the min- 
 istry much credit for the spirit or prudence of their con- 
 duct. I see that even where their measures were well chosen, 
 they are incapable of carrying them through, without some un- 
 happy mixture of weakness or imprudence. They are inca- 
 pable of doing entirely right." 
 
 Junius to the Duke of Grafton. " There is something in 
 both [your character and conduct], which distinguishes you, 
 not only from all other ministers, but all other men. It 
 is not that you do wrong by design, but that you should never 
 do right by mistake" 
 
 Chatham. " I do from my conscience, and from the best 
 weighed principles of my understanding, applaud the augmen- 
 tation of the army," he. &c. 
 
 We have inserted this striking consimilitude in page 263, 
 and therefore omit it here, but annex what was said upon it by 
 
 Junius. " The ministry, it seems, are laboring to draw a 
 line of distinction between the honor of the crown and the 
 rights of the people. This new idea has yet been only started 
 in discourse ; for, in effect, both objects have been equally 
 sacrificed. I neither understand the distinction, nor what use 
 the ministry propose to make of it. The King's honor is that 
 of the people. Their real honor and interest are the same. 
 I am not contending for a vain punctilio. A clear, unblemish- 
 ed character comprehends not only the integrity that will not 
 offer, but the spirit that will not submit to an injury ; and 
 whether it belongs to an individual or to a community, it is the
 
 292 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 foundation of peace, of independence, and of safety. Private 
 credit is wealth; public honoris security. The feather, that 
 adorns the royal bird, supports his flight. Strip him of his plu- 
 mage, and you fix him to the earth." 
 
 We have said already, in page 264, that we find, in Lord 
 Chatham's speech of the ninth of January, 1770, the germ of 
 this beautiful flower of Junius. We agree in sentiment with 
 Mr. Taylor on the striking consimilarity of the two splendid 
 passages ; at the same time we wonder, that the writer, who 
 saw and felt, again and again, the congeniality, never once 
 raised his eyes from the reporter, — the stenographer, up to the 
 spiritual original ! Such purely ex corde sentiments, fixed opin- 
 ions, and fine rhetorical figures, must be a rivulet /ro/ra the same 
 clear intellectual fountain, and by no means the mere incidental 
 clothing of a reporter, however able. 
 
 Chatham. [The following is a weighty paragraph, — a rich 
 portion of the history of England, in the early part of the reign 
 of George the Third.] " My Lords, I am not unpractised in 
 business, and if, with all that apparent diligence and all that 
 assistance which the noble Duke speaks of, the accounts in 
 question have not yet been made up, I am convinced there 
 must be a defect in some of the public offices, which ought to 
 be strictly inquired into and severely punished. But, my 
 Lords, the waste of the public money is not of itself so impor- 
 tant, as the pernicious purpose to which we have reason to 
 suspect that money has been applied. 
 
 " For some years past, there has been an influx of wealth 
 into this country, which has been attended with many fatal con- 
 sequences, because it has not been the regular, natural produce 
 of labor and industry. The riches of Asia have been poured 
 in upon us, and have brought with them not only Asiatic luxu- 
 ry, but, I fear, Asiatic principles of government. Without con- 
 nexions, without any natural interest in the soil, the importers 
 of foreign gold have forced their way into Parliament, by 
 such a torrent of private corruption, as no private, hereditary 
 fortune could resist. My Lords, not saying but what is within
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 293 
 
 the knowledge of us all, the corruption of the people is the 
 great original cause of the discontents of the people them- 
 selves, of the enterprise of the crown, and the notorious decay 
 of the internal vigor of the constitution. For this great evil 
 some immediate remedy must be provided ; and I confess, my 
 Lords, I did hope, that his Majesty's servants would not have 
 suffered so many years of peace to elapse, without paying 
 some attention to an object, which ought to engage and* inter- 
 est us all. I flattered myself I should see some barriers thrown 
 •up in defence of the constitution, some impediment formed to 
 stop the rapid progress of corruption." 
 
 Junius. " I am concerned to see that the great condition 
 which ought to be the sine qua non of parliamentary qualifica- 
 tion, which ought to be the basis, as it assuredly will be the 
 only support, of every barrier raised in defence of the consti- 
 tution, — I mean a declaration upon oath to shorten the dura- 
 tion of Parliaments, is reduced to the fourth rank in the esteem 
 of the Society."* 
 
 Chatham. " I doubt not we all agree that something must 
 be done. I shall offer my thoughts, such as they are, to the 
 consideration of the House ; and I wish that every noble 
 Lord, who hears me, would be as ready as I am to contribute 
 his opinion to this important service. I will not call my own 
 sentiments crude and indigested ; it would be unfit for me to 
 offer any thing to your Lordships which I had not well con- 
 sidered ; and this subject, I own, has long occupied my 
 thoughts. I will now give them to your Lordships without 
 reserve. 
 
 " Whoever understands the theory of the English constitu- 
 tion, and will compare it with the fact, must see at once how 
 widely they differ." 
 
 Junius. " Certainly nothing can be less reconcilable to 
 the theory, than the present practice of the constitution" 
 
 Chatham proceeds. " We must reconcile them to each 
 other, if we wish to save the liberties of this country ; we must 
 
 * Society for the support of the Bill of Rights.
 
 294 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 reduce our political practice as nearly as possible to our prin- 
 ciples. The constitution intended, that there should be a per- 
 manent relation between the constituent and representative 
 body of the people. Will any man affirm, that, as the House 
 of Commons is now formed, that relation is in any degree 
 preserved ? My Lords, it is not preserved, it is destroyed. 
 Let us be cautious, however, how we have recourse to violent 
 expedients." 
 
 Junius. " That the people are not equally and fully repre- 
 sented is unquestionable. But let us take care what we at- 
 tempt." 
 
 Chatham. " The boroughs of this country have properly 
 enough been called the rotten parts of the constitution. I 
 have lived in Cornwall, and, without entering into any invid- 
 ious particularity, have seen enough to justify the appellation. 
 But, in my judgment, my Lords, these boroughs, corrupt as 
 they are, must be considered as the natural infirmity of the 
 constitution. Like the infirmities of the body, we must bear 
 them with patience, and submit to carry them about with us. 
 The limb is mortified, but the amputation might be death." 
 
 Junius. " As to cutting away the rotten boroughs, I am as 
 much offended as any man at seeing so many of them under 
 the direct influence of the crown, or at the disposal of pri- 
 vate persons ; yet, I own, I have both doubts and apprehen- 
 sions in regard to the remedy you propose. I shall be charged, 
 perhaps, with an unusual want of political intrepidity, when 
 I honestly confess to you, that 1 am startled at the idea of so 
 extensive an amputation." 
 
 " When all your instruments of amputation are prepared ; 
 when the unhappy victim lies bound at your feet, without the 
 possibility of resistance, by what infallible rule will you direct 
 the operation ? When you propose to cut away the rotten 
 parts, can you tell us what parts are perfectly sound ? Are 
 there any certain limits in fact or theory, to inform you at what 
 point you must stop, — at what point the mortification ends ? " 
 [In a private letter to John Wilkes, Esq.]
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 295 
 
 Chatham. " Let us try, my Lords, whether some gentler 
 remedies may not be discovered. Since we cannot cure the 
 disorder, let us endeavour to infuse such a portion of new 
 health into the constitution, as may enable it to support its 
 most inveterate diseases." 
 
 Junius. " Besides that I approve highly of Lord Chat- 
 ham's idea of infusing a portion of new health into the consti- 
 tution, to enable it to bear its infirmities, (a brilliant ex- 
 pression, and full of intrinsic wisdom) other reasons concur in 
 persuading me to adopt it." 
 
 Chatham. " The representation of the counties is, I think, 
 still preserved pure and uncorrupted. That of the greatest 
 cities is upon a footing equally respectable ; and there are 
 many of the larger trading towns, which still preserve their in- 
 dependence. The infusion of health, which I now allude to, 
 would be to permit every county to elect one member more, 
 in addition to their present representation. The Knights of 
 the shires approach nearest to the constitutional representation 
 of the country, because they represent the soil." 
 
 Junius. " Lord Chatham's project, for instance, of increas- 
 ing the number of Knights of shires appears to me admirable." 
 
 Chatham. " It is not the little dependent boroughs ; it is 
 in the great cities and counties that the strength and vigor of 
 the constitution resides, and by them alone, if an unhappy 
 question should ever arise, will the constitution be honestly and 
 firmly defended. I would increase that strength, because 1 think 
 it is the only security we have against the profligacy of the times, 
 the corruption of the people, and the ambition of the crown. 
 
 " I think I have weighed every possible objection that can 
 be raised against a plan of this nature ; and I confess I see but 
 one, which, to me, carries any appearances of solidity. It 
 may be said, perhaps, that when the act passed for uniting the 
 two kingdoms (England and Scotland), the number of persons 
 who were to represent the whole nation in Parliament was pro- 
 portioned and fixed on for ever ; that this limitation is a funda- 
 mental article, and cannot be altered without hazarding a dis- 
 solution of the union.
 
 296 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 " My Lords, no man who hears me can have a greater rev- 
 erence for that wise and important act, than I have. I revere 
 the memory of that great Prince who first formed the plan, 
 and those illustrious patriots who carried it into execution. 
 As a contract, every article should be inviolable ; as the 
 common basis of the strength and happiness of two nations, 
 every article of it should be sacred." 
 
 Junius. " / am far from impeaching the articles of the 
 union.'''' 
 
 Chatham. " T hope I cannot be supected of conceiving a 
 thought so detestable, as to propose an advantage to one of the 
 contracting parties at the expense of the other. No, my 
 Lords, I mean that the benefit should be universal, and the 
 consent to receive it unanimous. Nothing less than a most 
 urgent and important occasion should persuade me to vary 
 even from the letter of the act ; but there is no occasion, how- 
 ever urgent, however important, that should ever induce me to 
 depart from the spirit of it. Let that spirit be religiously pre- 
 served. Let us follow the principle upon which the repre- 
 sentation of the two countries was proportioned at the union ; 
 and when we increase the number of representatives for the 
 English counties, let the shires of Scotland be allowed an equal 
 privilege." — " My Lords, besides my warm approbation of the 
 motion made by the noble Lord [Marquis of Rockingham], 1 
 have a natural and personal pleasure in rising up to second it. 
 I consider my seconding his Lordship's motion, and I would 
 wish it to be considered by others, as a public demonstration 
 of that cordial union which, I am happy to affirm, subsists 
 between us, — of my attachment to those principles which he 
 has so well defended, and of my respect for his person. 
 There has been a time, my Lords, when those*, who wished 
 well to neither of us, who wished to see us separated for 
 ever, found a sufficient gratification for their malignity against 
 us both. But that time is happily at an end. 
 
 " The friends of this country will, I doubt not, hear with 
 pleasure, that the noble Lord and his friends are now united
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 297 
 
 with me and mine, upon a principle which, I trust, will make 
 our union indissoluble. It is not to possess or divide the 
 emoluments of government ; but, if possible, to save the state. 
 Upon this ground we met, — upon this ground we stand firm 
 and inseparable. No ministerial artifices, no private offers, no 
 secret seduction can divide us. United as we are, we can set 
 the profoundest policy of the present ministry, their grand, 
 their only arcanum of government, their Divide et impera, at 
 defiance." 
 
 The parallel passages, which we have adduced, were se- 
 lected by a judicious writer, who searched them out for a pur- 
 pose different from our own : his was to prove that the 
 reporter of Chatham's speeches was in fact Junius, as he per- 
 ceived they contained not only his sentiments on several 
 important topics, but partook of his peculiar style and turn 
 of thought; whereas we have recourse to them to show, 
 that, instead of a mere reporter or stenographer, the great 
 orator himself was actually the audacious writer of the fa- 
 mous Letters, and that they and the equally famous Speeches 
 flowed from one and the same intellect. In holding this paral- 
 lelism up to view, we trust that we have neither magnified 
 trifles, nor traced similitudes where no likeness exists. We 
 moreover hope, that the attentive reader will re-peruse these 
 abstracts, for the richness of the matter and the corresponding 
 weight of the diction. They are pure gold ; while our adap- 
 tation may be considered only as the soldering. They are 
 valuable on another account ; they are extracted from portions 
 of two speeches, mighty in their personal and political conse- 
 quences. They confused still more a weak and discordant 
 ministry, and greatly enraged a self-willed monarch, who, in a 
 fit of resentment, took the great seals from the Lord Chancel- 
 lor Camden, on a suspicion that he divulged certain secrets of 
 the privy council to his friend, Lord Chatham, who had spoken 
 thus freely of the executive measures. 
 
 After the second of these speeches was delivered, several 
 resignations followed, and among them that of the vacillating 
 
 38
 
 298 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 and timorous Duke of Grafton ; and very many refused to ac- 
 cept of places under the crown ; not a man of consequence 
 would deign to take the place of Prime Minister, or Lord High 
 Chancellor. At length the King sent for Mr. Charles Yorke, 
 second son of the Earl of Hardwicke, who had held the offices 
 of Solicitor and Attorney-General to great satisfaction, and 
 whose elevation to the chancellorship had been long anticipated 
 as a very desirable event. He waited on his sovereign with 
 the fixed resolution of not accepting that station. Some courtly 
 writers say, that he reluctantly accepted the seals by the express 
 command of his Majesty ; but we uncourtly Americans, who 
 
 dare " speak truth and shame the d ," say, it was by 
 
 dint of wheedling, earnest intreaty, and even the tears of a 
 King, remarkably dexterous in the choice of means to obtain 
 his object, that this honor was inflicted upon the unhappy 
 man, who was ashamed to meet his friends after being thus 
 immediately operated upon, so that while the patent of his 
 peerage (that of Baron Morden) was preparing, he destroyed 
 his own life.* The great seals were then offered to Sir 
 Eardly Wilmot, who refused them, and to Lord Mansfield, 
 who declined them. In this perplexed condition of the 
 monarch's affairs, the Earl of Mansfield was made Speaker 
 of the House of Lords pro tern. At the same time the 
 Marquis of Granby resigned all his appointments, except the 
 regiment of blues ; the Duke of Beaufort, his post of master 
 of horse to the Queen ; the Duke of Manchester and the Earl 
 of Coventry, those of Lords of the Bedchamber ; the Earl of 
 Huntingdon, his place of Groom of the Stole ; Mr. Dunning, 
 that of Solicitor-General ; and James Grenville, that of Vice- 
 Treasurer of Ireland. All seemed at a stand. Yet, in the 
 midst of this singular perplexity, George the Third maintained a 
 surprising firmness, or a quality somewhat resembling it. At 
 length, to the astonishment of the remnants, of a deserted 
 court, Frederick Lord North, a name very famous even in 
 these ends of the earth, was mentioned as a suitable man to 
 
 * Junius speaks of this with horror.
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 099 
 
 administer the government of the almost abandoned King. 
 Open-mouthed incredulity stared with astonishment, while such 
 characters as Charles Townshend, John Wilkes, and Lord 
 Sandwich laughed outright ; and these expressions of the soul 
 were not lessened on learning that North's promotion was 
 chiefly owing to the influence of the Princess Dowager of 
 Wales upon her son. This great lady condescended to per- 
 suade the Gilford family to encourage the too diffident Lord 
 North to take the helm, notwithstanding the crazy condition of 
 the ship and the squally state of the atmosphere ; and she re- 
 laxed not her efforts till she fixed him there. She knew the 
 importance of a good moral character with her son and with the 
 nation. She saw its resistless power, when united to great 
 abilities in a Chatham, a Camden, and a few other noblemen, and 
 could not but acknowledge the ruinous effects of the lack of it 
 in men and women endowed with great talents, rendered bril- 
 liant by high station. Earl Waldegrave's resentment must have 
 induced him to underrate the talents of the King's mother. Her 
 sagacity in this and some other instances sufficiently evinces her 
 superior powers of discrimination. She knew the sort of man 
 who would best suit her son in carrying on his designs against 
 America, and who would listen to and follow the advice of 
 Lord Mansfield and of Lord Bute's private secretary, Charles 
 Jenkinson, the confidential and official adviser of the Queen.* 
 Lord North was what some people affect to despise, " a 
 good sort of a man," very amiable, frank, honest, and replete 
 with good-natured wit, with an assenting conversation, and 
 without a personal enemy 5 to which we may add a diffidence 
 of his own abilities and fitness for the high station which was 
 offered him.f He hesitated, and asked the advice of every one, 
 
 * Lord Liverpool was, at that time, Solicitor-General to her 
 Majesty. 
 
 f Good personal appearance goes a great way in favor of a public 
 character, as in a Lord Chatham and a Mansfield in England, and 
 Washington in America. On this head Lord North was not felicitous. 
 Since the daye of ^Esop, hardly a great man can be named of a more
 
 300 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 without daring to follow that of any, until he was fixed by the 
 stronger mind of the Germanic Minerva. The choice did 
 'credit to her penetration; for George Grenville had too many 
 scruples of conscience ;. the flourishing, versatile, Charles 
 Townshend was too flashy to lead, direct, or drive any great 
 
 ungainly figure. The staid and solemn Junius, in his thirty-ninth Let- 
 ter, speaks of him, ironically, as a minister who had a voice to per- 
 suade, an eye to penetrate, and a gesture to command ; and lest pos- 
 terity should mistake his words, he adds, in a note, " This graceful 
 minister is oddly constructed. His tongue is a little too big for his 
 mouth, and his eyes a great deal too big for their sockets. Every 
 part of his person sets natural proportion at defiance. At this pres- 
 ent writing (April, 1770) his head is supposed to be much too heavy 
 for his shoulders." It would puzzle, however, the executioner to de- 
 capitate him ; he would not know where his body ended, or head be- 
 gan. Mr. West, historical painter to his Majesty, once remarked to 
 the author, that Lord North looked more like a toad than any human 
 being he ever saw. The brilliant Charles Townshend, when Chancel- 
 lor of the Exchequer, said, pointing to Lord North, " See that great, 
 heavy, booby-looking, bursten-bellied, seeming changeling. You may 
 believe me, when I assure you it is a fact, that, if any thing should 
 happen to me [he died not long after], he will succeed to my place, 
 and very shortly after come to be First Commissioner of the Treasu- 
 ry." — [Public Characters of the most eminent Personages in the Parlia- 
 ment of Great Britain, considered as Statesmen, Senators, and Public 
 Speakers. London. 1777. p. 139.] Yet this was the man, whom the 
 Princess Dowager of Wales, whose judgment of the faculties of men 
 was never doubted, forced in a manner upon the King for his Prime 
 Minister ; a man as unlike Lords Sandwich, Holland, Bute, or Charles 
 Townshend, as can well be conceived. 
 
 Experience has long since taught me to discard the nonsense of 
 phrenology and the quackery of Lavaterism, as the most absurd and 
 unbenevolent system with which human nature has been insulted. 
 When I see external deformity, void of disease, I look out, almost in- 
 stinctively, for compensation in the mind. I am satisfied of the folly 
 of judging of the powers and bias of the soul by its case. How many 
 handsome fops and villains has society been pestered with, from Ab- 
 salom to Lovelace ? Has the adorable Creator made some men villains, 
 and then punished them for acting according to his material construc- 
 tion of them ? — No opportunity should be omitted " to justify the ways 
 of God to man."
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 301 
 
 portion of the nation, whether at home or abroad ; and the 
 whiffling Duke of Grafton too much of a weathercock. Lord 
 North was the very man to administer the miserable, half-way- 
 measures of George the Third towards the Americans, who 
 laughed at them both. His Lordship was contented to be, at 
 times, the minister of the interior, irresponsible cabinet, without 
 being contemptible ; and such was his easy disposition, that, in 
 the most perturbed seasons, — in times that tried men's souls, — 
 his Lordship would sleep and snore in the House of Commons 
 amidst the thunders of the opposition ; hence he was compared 
 to a top ; — the more whipped, the sounder it sleeps. To judge 
 of his character for pliability, we have only to reflect on his 
 coalition with Charles Fox, who had made him for years the 
 object of his keenest invective and the butt of his most pointed 
 ridicule. Nevertheless, Lord North had talents, character, good 
 intentions, fairness of mind, and manners that secured him the 
 good will of every one ; hence it happened that he was among 
 the most permanent ministers the crown ever employed ; for 
 as nobody envied him, so no one took pains to undermine and 
 remove him. He waddled through the American revolutiona- 
 ry war with Lord George (Sackville) Germaine for Secretary, 
 Howe, Burgoyne, and Clinton, for his Generals, in a conge- 
 niality with the whole group, that has no parallel in history ; 
 and as he never much excited our resentment, so we never felt 
 towards him a grudge like that, towards Lord Hillsborough and 
 the King's sword-bearer, the successful rival of Sir- Jeffrey 
 Amherst.* 
 
 At that eventful period to which we have alluded, Junius 
 appeared greatly interested in the parliamentary debates. It 
 was at an eve, says Mr. Heron, of an occasion upon which the 
 whigs hoped, at last, to force themselves in a body into ad- 
 ministration on their own terms. The Grenvilles, the Marquis 
 of Rockingham, with their respective adherents, were now 
 united. The Letter of Juntus to the King had just excited 
 
 * Lord Boutetourt, Governor of Virginia.
 
 302 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 universal attention. The bold remonstrance of the City of Lon- 
 don increased the ferment. It appears by the private letters of 
 Junius to Wilkes and to Wood fall, that he was roused to the 
 utmost solicitude to effect a change of ministers. He requests 
 the latter to give notice of the contemplated co-operation, 
 or what, on such occasions, used to be called in Boston " the 
 long pull, the strong pull, and the pull altogether ; " and that by 
 the extraordinary method of "dispersing hand-bills;" and added 
 to his request, " Pray do whatever you think will answer this 
 purpose best, for now is the crisis." At this period, Mr. Tay- 
 lor remarks, that Junius and Lord Chatham still fought un- 
 der the same banner ; and Junius, on hearing that his 
 Lordship intended to support the Westminster remonstrance 
 by going to the Hall, writes to his printer in the flush of 
 hope, " I have no doubt that we shall conquer them at last ; ,! 
 and, alluding to Chatham's speeches in Parliament at the 
 same time, he says, in a private letter to Wilkes, " Chatham 
 has gallantly thrown away the scabbard, and never flinched. 
 From that moment I began to like him." [!] * 
 
 While Junius was calling on the people, and on the powers 
 above them through the press, Lord Chatham was pouring 
 forth his torrents of eloquence in Parliament on the same sub- 
 jects, in the strains which we have recorded in the form of 
 parallel passages in the preceding chapter. Mr. Taylor re- 
 marks, that, in the commencement of the first speech, viz. on 
 the ninth of January, the sentiments and expressions of Junius, 
 for the space of ten lines, were borrowed from what now ap- 
 pears to have been Lord Chatham's speech, and this without 
 any acknowledgment, though the Letter was written nearly 
 two years after the speech was made. The words are not 
 exactly the same, but they are as near as the notes, from 
 which they are supposed to be taken, would render neces- 
 sary ; as near as any man, writing at two distant periods, 
 from the same notes, would be likely to make them ; they con- 
 
 * The female partridge could not have practised a better lure.
 
 JUNIUS AND CHATHAM PARALLELED. 303 
 
 vey the same thoughts, in the same order, with the fidelity of a 
 literal translation. " Now, in what way," says Mr. Taylor, 
 " is this to be accounted for ? There is no report printed 
 from which the passage could have been quoted, nor would 
 the plagiary have passed without observation if the original had 
 been known. The inference is unavoidable, that he, who 
 wrote the Letters, was likewise the Reporter of the Speech." [!] 
 After what we have said, repeated, and reiterated, we need 
 not add our inference. 
 
 The indefatigable compiler of the adduced passages, re- 
 marks upon them thus : — " Many other passages from the same 
 speech lead to the conclusion, that Junius had it in his memo- 
 ry when he wrote at a subsequent period. But let us proceed 
 to the second debate, and see whether in that also the internal 
 evidence is such as we have met with in the former. In the 
 first place Junius seems to have borrowed from this speech 
 those remarkable metaphors, the political Bible, and the feather 
 that adorns the royal bird, &ic. To have taken them he must 
 have heard the debate, for they are not elsewhere in print. 
 Secondly, in a private Letter to Wilkes, he speaks of cutting 
 aivay the rotten boroughs, in the figurative language of the 
 speech, and with the same doubts as to the policy of the act. 
 Thirdly, he not only alludes to the proposal of Lord Chat- 
 ham to increase the Knights of shires, but he quotes a passage 
 from the speech before us, in so very nearly the same words, 
 that we know not how to account for it, unless by the suppo- 
 sition, that he was himself the reporter. Under that idea the 
 coincidence explains itself; though, when it is considered that 
 notes only were taken of the speech, it may appear surprising, 
 that the two passages, when fully expressed, should bear so 
 close a resemblance to each other. But it is probable, that 
 the speech, though not published till twenty years after, was 
 composed while the original was fresh in the writer's memory, 
 which has caused it to be so intermingled with the thoughts 
 and expressions of Junius ; for, if viewed as the production 
 of another mind, it is equally unaccountable how much the
 
 304 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 speech in return owes to the Letters." [Yet this unaccountable- 
 ness did not open his eyes so wide as to see the truth.] " Lord 
 Chatham borrows an illustration from the latter with the same 
 freedom that Junius quotes his Lordship ; and there is an 
 equal departure from literal precision in both cases, — a proof 
 that the thoughts at first all emanated from the same mind, and 
 were the property of one writer, whatever names he might as- 
 sume." Then Mr. Taylor selects some particular phrases, 
 used by Chatham, Junius, and Sir Philip Francis. Indeed 
 he fills a chapter of twenty pages with them, and makes the 
 same application to his favorite supposition.* 
 
 Duly reflecting on the labors of this industrious gentleman, 
 our feelings towards him are similar to what we should expe- 
 rience on seeing a man very deeply interested in making a 
 quick journey from Boston to Worcester, taking the road to 
 Lancaster ; which brings to mind one of the many excellent 
 sayings of Lord Bacon, viz. " A lame man in the right road 
 will beat a racer in the wrong." We have yet another feeling 
 towards this writer, lest, after our free use of his parallels, he 
 should say with Virgil, -in his beautiful epigram, 
 
 Hos ego versiculos feci, tulit alter honor es ; 
 
 and 
 Sic vos non vobis nidificatis, aves ; 
 Sic vos non vobis meliificatis, apes. 
 
 But so it is in all improvements, where one man stands upon 
 the shoulders of another. 
 
 * " Junius occasionally intersperses, throughout his Letters, mtx- 
 ims, phrases and figures, thrown out by Lord Chatham viva voce." — 
 Taylor.
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 
 NOTICES OF LORD CAMDEN, LORD CHIEF JUSTICE MANSFIELD, 
 LORD HOLLAND, THE DUKE OF BEDFORD, THE DUKE OF 
 GRAFTON, AND LORD AMHERST, IN REFERENCE TO JUNIUS. 
 
 Our task would be incomplete, nor less so our satisfaction, 
 if we omitted to notice certain characters placed in the temple 
 of fame by Junius, standing like so many statues and busts on 
 pedestals, — others only in bold relievo, and some in fresco or 
 everlasting plaster, by a first-rate artist. Junius gives unqualified 
 praise to two characters alone, — Lords Camden and Rochford. 
 Of the latter we know only, that he was a very respectable 
 twig of an honorable branch of a venerable trunk of nobility, 
 and was honored with the good opinion of the fastidious Juni- 
 us. We " no further seek his merits to disclose." We had as 
 lief dig in the mud as hunt out British pedigrees and peer- 
 ages, in which perplexing process we Americans are liable to 
 ridiculous mistakes, gaining no credit if accurate, and losing 
 much if otherwise. The Briton delights in such researches, 
 while we colonists never troubled ourselves with inquiries of 
 this sort ; for, if we did, in some portions of the United States 
 we should be brought up by a convict, and in another by a 
 Puritan with his astringent countenance. The old world gene- 
 rally, the Britons particularly, are in the habit of looking back, 
 not only to the preterperfect, but to the preterpluperfect tense ; 
 whereas our views are all in ihe future, to the glory of those 
 whose native language is the English. Let us first speak of 
 
 Lord Camden. 
 
 The distinguished figure, which Charles Pratt, Lord Cam- 
 den, made during William Pitt's career of renown, and even 
 
 39
 
 306 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 since that splendid period of English history, and the noble 
 picture of him by the masterly hand of Junius, mark him out 
 an object of particular attention. Besides, Camden is a name 
 dear to us Americans ; second to none but that of Pitt, alias 
 Chatham. 
 
 When this last named great statesman was forming his ever 
 memorable administration in July, seventeen hundred and fifty- 
 seven, he desired that Mr. Pratt, then a favorite pleader at 
 the bar of the House of Commons, should be made Attorney- 
 General, in the room of Sir Robert Henley promoted. As 
 Mr. Pratt was a highly valued friend of Pitt before and after he 
 became Lord Chatham, enjoying his confidence till his death, 
 and was, after it, one of his executors, we cannot, consistently 
 with our purpose (which is the connecting of the most interest- 
 ing portion of British history with that of America), pass him by 
 in a hurry, more especially as he was a distinguished favorite 
 of Junius, as well as the dear friend of Lord Chatham. 
 
 He was the son of Sir John Pratt, Lord Chief Justice of 
 the Court of King's Bench, educated at Eton school, and 
 was six years younger than his friend Pitt. He was a fellow 
 of King's College, Cambridge, as early as 1731. We are 
 told, that his professional practice was, for many years, but 
 narrow ; yet in 1752 we find him supporting the rights of Ju- 
 ries in opposition to William Murray, Esq. afterwards the cele- 
 brated Lord Mansfield, in a libel-case, in which Mr. Pratt's 
 client was acquitted. From that period, his path gradually 
 widened before him, so that, in 1761, he was constituted Chief 
 Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, and, at the same time, 
 honored with knighthood. " Though he presided with dignity, 
 weight, and impartiality, he was yet more distinguished by the 
 boldness and independence of his decisions." When the fa- 
 mous champion of the people's rights, John Wilkes, was ar- 
 rested and committed to the tower, Sir Charles Pratt granted 
 him a writ of habeas corpus ; and when he was brought 
 before the court, he discharged him from confinement. May 
 it be ever remembered that, in the cause of the rights of the
 
 NOTICE OF LORD CAMDEN. 307 
 
 people, the right honorable William Pitt and Sir Charles Pratt 
 marched to fame under the same banner. In the year 1765 
 he was created a Peer, by the title of Earl Camden, and, in 
 1766, was appointed Lord High Chancellor. Soon afterward 
 he was suddenly dismissed by his Sovereign, on suspicion that 
 he communicated some of the secrets of the privy-council to 
 his friend, Lord Chatham, who glanced at them in the famous 
 speech in the House of Lords already quoted ; which occasion- 
 ed the alarming resignations of that period. It is universally 
 known in this country, that Lord Camden was a warm, steady, 
 and consistent advocate of the great American cause, in which 
 he was cordially joined by Chatham and Rockingham in the 
 House of Lords, and Barre and Burke in the House of Com- 
 mons. 
 
 Earl Camden's life was protracted till April, 1794. 
 
 We are enabled to give a nearer view of Lord Chatham and 
 of Lord Camden than heretofore, from aid afforded us by our 
 venerated countryman, Doctor Franklin, who was noticed in 
 a particular and friendly manner by both of them. 
 
 Lord Chatham expressed to Dr. Franklin, on his second 
 visit to that nobleman, his high opinion of the American Con- 
 gress, commending their temper, moderation, and wisdom. 
 He inquired much and particularly concerning the state and 
 condition of the country ; the probability of their perseverance ; 
 the difficulties they must meet with in adhering, for a long 
 time, to their resolutions ; the resources they might have to 
 supply the deficiency of commerce. His Lordship expressed 
 great regard and warm affection for America, with hearty 
 wishes for her prosperity, and that government might soon 
 come to see its mistakes and rectify them ; and intimated, that, 
 possibly he might, if his health permitted, prepare something 
 for its consideration, when the Parliament should meet after 
 the holydays ; on which he wished to have Franklin's senti- 
 ments. " I mentioned to him," said the Doctor, " the very 
 hazardous state I conceived we were in, by the continuance of 
 the army in Boston ; that, whatever disposition there might be
 
 308 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 in the inhabitants to give no just cause of offence to the troops, 
 or in the General [Gagl] to preserve order among them, an 
 unpremeditated, unforeseen quarrel might happen between 
 perhaps a drunken porter and a soldier, that might bring on a 
 riot, tumult, and bloodshed, and in its consequences produce a 
 breach impossible to be healed ; that the army could not pos- 
 sibly answer any good purpose there, and might be infinitely 
 mischievous ; that no accommodation could properly be pro- 
 posed and entered into by the Americans while the bayonet 
 was at their breasts'; that, to have any agreement binding, all 
 force should be withdrawn." 
 
 " From Lord Chatham's, I went," says the Doctor, - l to 
 wait upon Lord Camden. I met his Lordship and family in 
 two carriages, just without his gate, going on a visit of con- 
 gratulation to Lord and Lady Chatham on the recent marriage 
 of their daughter. They were to be back at dinner ; so I 
 agreed to go in, stay to dinner, and spend the evening there, 
 and not return to town till next morning. We had that af- 
 ternoon and evening a great deal of conversation on our Ameri- 
 can affairs, concerning which Lord Camden was very inquisi- 
 tive ; and 'I gave him the best information in my power. I 
 was charmed with his generous and noble sentiments, and had 
 the great pleasure of hearing his full approbation of the Con- 
 gress and their petition, of which, at his request, I afterwards 
 sent him a copy. He seemed anxious, that the Americans 
 should continue to act with the same temper, coolness, and 
 wisdom, with which they had hitherto proceeded in most of 
 their public assemblies ; in which case he did not doubt they 
 would succeed in establishing their rights, and obtain a solid 
 and durable agreement with the mother country ; of the ne- 
 cessity and great importance of which agreement, he seemed 
 to have the strongest impression." * 
 
 It is here manifest, that neither Lord Camden, nor Lord 
 Chatham, nor indeed Franklin himself contemplated an entire 
 
 * Franklin's Memoirs, published by his grandson.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD CAMDEN. 309 
 
 separation of the two countries. Not many days after these 
 conversations, Dr. Franklin received a card from Lord Stan- 
 hope,* expressing Lord Chatham's wish, that he would be 
 present in the House of Lords, when he intended to make a 
 motion relative to the speedy removal of the troops from 
 Boston . 
 
 Dr. Franklin gives an animated account of Chatham's 
 speech on that occasion. It was then his Lordship declared, 
 of our first Congress, in the British House of Peers, that, " for 
 solidity of reasoning, force of sagacity, and wisdom of conclu- 
 sion, under such a complication of difficult circumstances, no 
 nation, or body of men, can stand in preference to the general 
 Congress at Philadelphia ; and that all attempts to impose ser- 
 vitude upon such men must be vain and fatal ; and that if min- 
 isters persevere in misadvising and misleading the King, that 
 if they did not alienate the affections of his subjects, he would 
 affirm, that, the American jewel out of it, they would make 
 the Crown not worth his wearing." 
 
 After Lord Chatham had denied the right of Parliament to 
 tax the Americans without their consent, he was followed by 
 his friend. 
 
 Lord Camden, in a speech never, perhaps, surpassed, for 
 learning, perspicuity, and solid argument, said, " My Lords, I 
 have searched the matter, and I declare, not only as a states- 
 man, a politician, and a philosopher, but as a common law- 
 yer, you have no right to tax America." And he stated 
 some cases where it was lawful to resist Parliament. In this 
 united effort at conciliation with America, Lords Chatham 
 and Camden strove together with the utmost patriotic zeal ; 
 well knowing the consequences to English Liberty, if the 
 spirit of it should be extinguished in this country. 
 
 " On Friday the twenty-seventh of January, 1775," con- 
 tinues Dr. Franklin, "I waited again on Lord Chatham, 
 
 * Lord Stanhope was an able, honest, philosophical, and patriotic 
 man, but eccentric. If he was, in external appearance, below, he was, 
 in mind and philanthropic views, above his titular rank.
 
 310 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 when he acquainted me, in a long conversation, with the out- 
 lines of his plan of conciliation, parts of which he read to me ; 
 and he said, that he had communicated it only to Lord Cam- 
 wen, whose advice he much relied on, particularly in the law 
 part." 
 
 Let it be remembered, that, less than thirty years ago, Lord 
 Eldon declared, in the House of Lords, that " the author of 
 Junius, if not himself a lawyer, must certainly have written in 
 concert with the ablest and best of lawyers." It was believed 
 by some in the higher circles, that Lord Camden and Lord 
 Temple knew the author of Junius.* 
 
 We have given this narrative and adduced these facts to 
 show, that there was not only a personal regard, like that be- 
 tween William Pitt and Henry Fox, of Eton-school origin, 
 but that a confidential one existed between the former and 
 Lord Camden, while no such confidential attachment ever 
 bound together Lord Chatham and Lord Holland ; their po- 
 litical walks, private occupations, and religious opinions were 
 widely different. The attachment between Chatham and 
 Camden was not a mere contact of generous feelings, but an 
 amalgamation, and of that sort which never suffered separa- 
 tion during their renowned lives, and hardly after it. 
 
 " Oh happy friends ! for if my pen could give 
 Immortal life, your fame should ever live, 
 Fixed as the Capitol's foundation lies, 
 And spread where'er our conquering Eagle flies." f 
 
 * " I know enough of Junius to know, that he was of Lord Temple's 
 school, and that he wrote that paper from hints or materials prompted 
 by him. So far he was betrayed in one of the Letters to Lord Cam- 
 den; for in that Letter he touched upon a fact known only to three 
 persons, Lord Chatham, Lord Camden, and Lord Temple.'''' — (See E. 
 H. Barker's Letters on Junius, p. 142.) 
 
 f " Fortunati ambo ! si quid mea carmina possunt, 
 Nulla dies unquam memori vos eximet sevo: 
 Dum domus iEnese Capitoli immobile saxum 
 Accolet, imperiumque pater Romanus habebit." 
 
 Vir6. JEn. IX. 
 The above is Dryden's translation of the passage.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD CAMDEN. 311 
 
 Having shown how Lord Camden and Lord Chatham stood 
 affected towards each other, let us see how Junius, the 
 man behind the curtain, stood affected towards the conspicuous 
 Lord Camden. 
 
 I think I have explained away the severe reflection, or rath- 
 er equivocal accusation against Lord Camden in the first Let- 
 ter of Junius, insinuating that Mr. Pitt and Lord Camden di- 
 vided, in effect, one half of the empire from the other, merely 
 to destroy George Grenville as a Prime Minister ; a most art- 
 ful lure, sported by the man in a mask to elude the pursuit of 
 curiosity and vengeance. 
 
 Lord Camden's friends endured a little mortification when 
 Junius attributed to him an illegal doctrine respecting the sus- 
 pension of an act of the legislature by the Crown, in the recess 
 of Parliament, on the plea of great necessity in a scarcity of 
 corn, occasioned by an inclement season. For so ascendant 
 was the spirit of this invisible being upon public opinion, that 
 his approbation or disapprobation was felt from the highest to 
 the lowest, from the throne to the play-house. The case was 
 this. 
 
 There was a failure in " corn" * and a scarcity all over Eu- 
 rope. A royal proclamation was issued, forbidding any further 
 exportation, and thus the laws were made, in this instance, to 
 give way to the mandates of the King and Council ; and this ar- 
 bitrary measure was advocated by Lord Chancellor Cam- 
 den. The Tories instantly turned Whigs and patriots, and 
 condemned the deed as an attack on the constitution, more 
 dangerous than the case of ship-money in the reign of Charles 
 the First, or the dispensing power assumed by James the Sec- 
 ond. They called it the "forty days' tyranny." Lord Cam- 
 den vindicated the measure on the ground of state necessity, 
 instead of saying, as Chatham once did, " I am aware that it 
 
 * In England they call corn what we in America call by the general 
 name of grain ; restricting the former term to maize. Thus we say, — 
 The crop of wheat is good, but the corn is bad : It is a good year for 
 barley and rye, but bad for corn.
 
 312 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 is a step against law, but I am driven to it to obviate the great 
 calamity of famine, and therefore I throw myself on the mercy 
 of my country." In this single instance, Lord Chatham was 
 opposed in opinion to Lord Camden ; and so was the steady 
 and consistent Junius ; yet while they disagreed from the 
 great law Lord, they both spoke of him apologetically, well 
 knowing the sterling integrity of the man. But the " King's 
 Friends,'" — high prerogative men, — Tories, or by whatever 
 name you choose to designate those in Parliament who stood 
 opposed to the principles of Chatham, Camden, and Junius, — 
 these made a great outcry, indeed, in hopes of making a breach 
 between Camden and Chatham. They had felt and dreaded 
 their union and co-operation, and in this case they acted up- 
 on the devil's motto, — " Divide and conquer." But Chatham 
 and Junius, knowing their hearts, soon dissipated all their hopes 
 on that head. It is worthy of notice, that, on this question, 
 Lord Mansfield spoke against the power. of the Crown, and, 
 for the first .time, stood up for the constitution ; but, good as 
 his ground was, he was afraid to tread upon it. 
 
 Junius stiffly maintained his assertion in opposition to the 
 declaration of Lord Camden ; but instead of pouring forth a 
 torrent of invective and ridicule, as was too often the case with 
 him, he says, in a style of unusual respect, " With regard to 
 Lord Camden, the truth is, that he inadvertently overshot him- 
 self, as appears plainly by that unguarded mention of ' a ty- 
 ranny of forty days,' which I myself heard." Junius com- 
 mences his Sixtieth Letter, under the signature of Pkilo-Ju- 
 nius, thus, " I am convinced, that Junius is incapable of wil- 
 fully misrepresenting any man's opinion, and that his inclina- 
 tion leads him to treat Lord Camden with particular candor 
 and respect." 
 
 Yet all these facts are but trifling indications of the high re- 
 gard of Junius for Lord Camden, compared with his expres- 
 sions in his final Letter, which is addressed to that great law- 
 yer. It is in a strain of dignified solicitude, as if supplicating 
 the guardian angel of Britain to preserve from injury the sa-
 
 NOTICE OF LORD CAMDEN. 313 
 
 cred temple of the laws, endangered by its Chief Hierophant.* 
 He says, in a style of remarkable grandeur, 
 
 " My Lord, — I turn with pleasure from that barren waste, 
 in which no salutary plant takes root, no verdure quickens, to 
 a character fertile, as I willingly believe, in every great and 
 good qualification. 
 
 " I call you, in the name of the English nation, to stand 
 forth in defence of the laws of your country, and to ex- 
 ert, in the cause of truth and justice, those great abilities, with 
 which you were entrusted for the benefit of mankind." — 
 " After the noble stand you made against Lord Mansfield 
 upon the question of libel, we did expect that you would not 
 have suffered that matter to have remained undetermined." — 
 " Your Lordship's character assures me, that you will assume 
 that principal part which belongs to you, in supporting the laws 
 of England against a wicked judge, who makes it the occu- 
 pation of his life to misinterpret and pervert them." — " When 
 the contest turns upon the interpretation of the laws, you can- 
 not, without a formal surrender of all your reputation, yield the 
 post of honor even to Lord Chatham." — " Considering the 
 situation and abilities of Lord Mansfield, I do not scruple to 
 affirm, with the most solemn appeal to God for my sincerity, 
 that, in my judgment, he is the very worst and most dangerous 
 man in the kingdom. Thus far I have done my duty in en- 
 deavouring to bring him to punishment. But mine is an infe- 
 rior ministerial office in the temple of justice. I have bound 
 the victim, and dragged him to the altar. Junius." 
 
 We know not how this article concerning Camden, Chat- 
 ham, and Junius will strike the mind of our reader ; but for 
 
 * JHadox says, that the Chief Jusliciarius was the greatest subject 
 in England. Beside presiding in the King's Court and in the Ex- 
 chequer, he was originally, by virtue of his office, the Regent of the 
 Kingdom, during the absence of the Sovereign, which, till the loss of 
 Normandy, occurred very frequently. Writs, at such times, ran in his 
 name, and were tested by him. — History of the, Exchequer. 
 
 40
 
 314 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ourselves we, with all our cautious quality, cannot resist 
 saying, that it makes strongly in favor of the identification of 
 Junius with Chatham. It appears, that Chatham and Cam- 
 den were bound together in strict friendship all their lives with- 
 out any interruption. Forlunati ambo, indeed ! The closing 
 Letter of Junius and the executorship of Camden rivet our 
 opinion, and strengthen our hypothesis. Next to Lord Cam- 
 den, it seems that Lord Temple was the confidential friend of 
 Lord Chatham. This friendship was once unhappily broken 
 between the brothers, but soldered, and rendered thereby 
 stronger than ever. We next raise our eyes to 
 
 Lord Mansfield. 
 
 William Murray, William Pitt, and Charles Pratt, or, as 
 they are better known by their titles of Mansfield, Chatham, 
 and Camden, were three of the greatest men of their day. 
 We may add to them a fourth, Edmund Burke, a politician 
 sui generis. 
 
 The subject of this rapid sketch was early distinguished 
 as a very able, industrious, and learned young man, and, at 
 length, an acute and solid lawyer, a charming speaker, and 
 accomplished gentleman. Though immersed in the dry study 
 of the law, Mr. Murray's active and ambitious mind gave con- 
 stant proofs of its ingenuity, and aided him to a refinement of 
 manners superinduced on an amiable disposition, which im- 
 parted an air of high breeding and elegance ; and all these ac- 
 complishments were recommended by an uncommonly hand- 
 some person, totally free from all that impatience, which, at 
 times, marked and marred the illustrious Chatham. There was 
 one defect, however, which, though a trait of an amiable disposi- 
 tion, weakened his force as a great parliamentary orator, — a 
 dash of timidity, that induced a habit of discretion or prudence, 
 for which the Scotch are remarkable all the world over. In 
 this respect he was the reverse of Mr. Pitt, who, with less 
 learning, had more genius and courage of all kinds ; for with 
 a Demosthenical style of oratory, and a fearless heart that
 
 NOTICE OF LORD MANSFIELD. 315 
 
 winged his words with lightning, he struck down all before him, 
 frequently covering his opponent with paleness and dismay. 
 The impetuous and domineering manner of Chatham some- 
 times overwhelmed the cool and guarded logic of Mansfield. 
 
 Naturally and nationally partial to the Stuart dynasty, Lord 
 Mansfield was yet a loyal and even a favorite subject of King 
 George the Third, and of the Princess Dowager of Wales, so 
 early as the time when it was supposed that Prince George 
 was in the leading-strings of Lord Bute. 
 
 We need not say, that Lord Mansfield was a Tory and 
 Lord Chatham a Whig* Opposite in political principles, they 
 were, it seems, rivals in fame, and, as far as we know, n the 
 favor of the Sovereign, Some have thought that Lord Chat- 
 ham envied Mansfield's learning, abilities, and influence, and 
 that he sought occasion in Parliament to diminish them. He 
 certainly spoke to him and of him in a spirit of apparent ran- 
 cor, and did not withhold a sarcasm as long as he was able to 
 utter any thing. Henry Fox (Lord Holland), in a letter to 
 
 * These cant terms, having been long since engrafted on classical 
 language, have become fixed, though a little variant in the United 
 States from the sense they bear in their original soil. Tory, in England, 
 means one who adheres to the ancient constitution of the state, and to 
 the apostolical hierarchy of the church of England. — Johnson. Whig, 
 one who advocates the constitutional rights of the people, as estab- 
 lished at the British revolution in lt>88. In America, those who advo- 
 cated resistance to British encroachments, during the reign of George 
 the Third, were called Whigs; while Tory is synonymous with a roy- 
 alist, or an advocate for our dependence on the realm of Great Britain; 
 so that we had in this country Episcopalian Whigs, and high Presby- 
 terian Tories. In England, I have seen the aristocracy of Whiggism, 
 and often the unobtrusive and amiable carriage of Toryism. Our cele- 
 brated countryman Dr. Franklin, when colony-agent, tried in vain, for 
 a series of years, to get access to Mr. William Pitt, though well ac- 
 quainted with his private secretary, Mr. Wood, when he might have 
 met with no difficulty in speaking with the Lord Chief Justice Mans- 
 field. In process of time, Lord Chatham returned Franklin's visit in 
 Craven street, and Lord Mansfield took particular care to notice, in 
 the House of Lords, our first minister, John Adams.
 
 316 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the Marquis of ' Hartington gives an account of Pitt's wonder- 
 ful eloquence, the day preceding, in the House of Commons, 
 which he describes in strains of rapture. His letter begins 
 thus. — " More news ! Pitt entertained us again yesterday ; 
 and I never wished more than yesterday for your Lordship, 
 for the pleasure it would have given you. I sat next Murray, 
 who suffered for an hour." 
 
 We would ask, in passing, whether any one was ever known 
 to treat that great man with the like harshness of language, even 
 to bitter invective, Junius alone excepted ? It has been often 
 remarked, that the Lord Chief Justice Mansfield was seen 
 to turn pale and tremble, when Lord Chatham rose up and 
 turned his menacing eyes upon him. It could not be entirely 
 for his advising and aiding the ratification of the peace in 
 1763, although that had a powerful operation in the mind of 
 the administrator of the war against France ; for he indulged 
 himself in the like strains of invective before that period. 
 Every one knows that the prime agent in making that abom- 
 inable peace was the Earl of Bute, and that that nobleman re- 
 garded his countryman Lord Mansfield as an oracle in every- 
 thing ; and it is as well known, than an animosity between 
 Chatham and Mansfield grew up and increased from the year 
 1762 to the close of the life of the former. 
 
 Earl Mansfield invariably voted against the repeal of our 
 obnoxious stamp act. The celebrated protest, which followed 
 the repeal, if not written originally by him, was certainly drawn 
 up under his eye, and defended, word by word, by the same 
 personage. He uniformly and steadily advocated the coer- 
 cion 1 of these colonies. In 1770 he supported the partial re- 
 peal of the port-duties, but carefully continuing that Trojan 
 horse, the duty on tea, which the British to this day consider 
 the immediate cause of their unhappy contention with and final 
 loss of America. When the whig phalanx, with Lord Rocking- 
 ham at its head, and Burke its cornet, went out of office, they 
 left the declaratory act as a salvo for the honor, or, as some 
 imagined, the deserted power of Great Britain, Lord Mansfield
 
 NOTICE OF LORD MANSFIELD. 317 
 
 united with the administration in thinking, that the act for lay- 
 ing on the port-duties would be the means of breathing a soul 
 into the declaratory act, winch, without it or some other spe- 
 cies of acquiescence and active acknowledgment on the part 
 of America, must, he thought, remain lifeless, nugatory, and 
 ineffective ; for he looked upon the repeal of tbe stamp act as a 
 tacit relinquishment of the supreme authority of Britain over 
 this country. In a word, the Lord Chief Justice was an uni- 
 form and hearty supporter of all the measures of George the 
 Third in striving to bring America to his feet. Yet every co- 
 ercive measure, from the stamp act in 17G4 to our declaration 
 of independence, produced a directly contrary effect to that 
 which its abettors predicted. It is remarkable, however, that 
 Mansfield built all bis arguments and reasoning upon the single 
 supposition, that America had, from the beginning of her histo- 
 ry, aimed at independency, and that the utmost the people of 
 America would ever be prevailed upon to consent to, would be 
 an acknowledgment of the personal supremacy of the King of 
 Great Britain, detached, in that instance, from, and unconnect- 
 ed with his Parliament. And this may be considered as a 
 renewed proof of the superior sagacity of that very able man. 
 If Lord Chatham did not see this determination in the leading 
 men of New England and in Virginia, it was because he would 
 not. 
 
 There certainly was something very much resembling hatred 
 between Mansfield and Chatham in the reign of the Third 
 George. Ambition, the pride of great minds, is liable to 
 convert generous rivalship and competition into envy, which 
 sees nothing in a rival in a fair light. This unhappy pas- 
 sion grudges due praise to the merit of another, and natu- 
 rally generates aversion, a corrosive mixture, which is apt to 
 acquire, in advanced life, the morbid acrimony of hatred and 
 malice, and sometimes the venom of revenge. We have never 
 been able to detect very much of it in the Lord Chief Justice. 
 A man in that station ought to be as free from it as an Archbish- 
 op in his, though he was so imprudent as to soil his ermine with
 
 318 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 politics. Whether there be any symptoms of venom or re- 
 venge in the writings of Junius, is left to the decision of every 
 judicious and candid reader. 
 
 While the Earl of Chatham was in the storms of political 
 strife, and sometimes in its hurricanes, Lord Mansfield was 
 preserved hy a gentle spirit from all such tempests, and, we 
 may add, from their heart-sinking calms. Until his house was 
 destroyed, and his library and manuscripts burnt by a London 
 mob, he had gone through life with an unruinpled temper; 
 whereas Chatham had encountered enough to ruffle the tem- 
 per of an Epictetus or a Socrates. He saw a man,* who was 
 never consulted in any negotiation before, nor ever labored for 
 his country, with a single stroke of his pen, assign to France 
 and Spain the fruits of conquests which had cost him the deep- 
 est thought and consideration to plan, and Englishmen the ut- 
 most exertion to achieve. Who can wonder at his indigna- 
 tion ? 
 
 It appears that Junius had taken as fixed a resolution 
 to pull down Lord Mansfield, as he, with Lord Bute and 
 their respective adherents, had to divest Chatham of his 
 vast popularity, and drive him from the service of his King 
 and Country. Neither of them obtained his wish entirely. 
 Chatham's sun sat in all its glory ; while Mansfield's seemed to 
 go down in a cloud, from the truculent fury of a London mob, 
 totally blind to his merits, and incapable of comprehending his 
 errors ! 
 
 Henry Fox, — Lord Holland. 
 
 To my view it appears clearly, that both Junius and Lord 
 Chatham had a regard or forbearing friendship for Lord Hol- 
 land, without that amalgamation which appears to have subsist- 
 ed between Chatham, Camden, and Lord Temple, and even 
 George Grenville. Taking this for granted, we shall try, 
 in this sketch, to explain it ; and if we cannot, others may 
 from our imperfect hints. 
 
 * The Duke of Bedford.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD HOLLAND. 3 1 9 
 
 We have said already, that Mr. Fox and Mr. Pitt were knit 
 together in friendship at Eton school. Fox was the elder 
 by three years. They were young men of different constitu- 
 tions, complexions, and habits. Fox was one of those dark- 
 visaged, iron-fibred men, more resembling one of our aborigi- 
 nal Indian warriors of the very first rank, than what he really 
 was, a man of pleasure in a refined society. Frank, generous, 
 and unguarded in his temper, he had a kindness in his man- 
 ners that attached people to him of both sexes. He was, 
 however, sadly addicted to gaming, without a sordid feeling, 
 being universally respected as a man of honor, spirit, and in- 
 tegrity. 
 
 Fox and Pitt were frequently opposed to each other as far 
 back as the year 1754. The latter treated him, at times, as 
 he did every other opponent, and sometimes worse ; yet each 
 for the other had a steady friendship, partaking of kindred af- 
 fection, rather than congeniality of mind and habits. If Pitt 
 said a very severe thing in debate, and none could say severer, 
 which seemed to wound the feelings of his old school-fellow, 
 he generally followed it with something soothing. With keen- 
 ness of remark he commonly mixed something commendatory, 
 but in few words ; his friendship for Mr. Fox appears to 
 have been of that kind which ever excludes gaudy eulogy, — 
 like that of one good-natured, overbearing brother for another. 
 Though naturally quick, passionate, and resentful, it was ap- 
 parent to all in the House, that Fox bore the lash of the 
 " great Commoner " with wonderful coolness, and when very 
 severe, in a sort of sullen silence, as much as to say, — How 
 can you treat me so ! On one occasion, when the debate had 
 been very warm, and the flagellation severe, and the taunts 
 personal, Mr. Pitt declared to the House, that he never de- 
 scended to personality towards Mr. Fox ; who, on his part, 
 wished that every evil might befall him, if, when Secretary of 
 State, he had said, as was suspected, or hinted any thing to 
 the King (George the Second) to Mr. Pitt's disadvantage ; for 
 the old monarch was very partial to Fox, and almost hated Pitt.
 
 320 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 The honorable fact was, Mr. Fox was proud of the extra- 
 ordinary talents of Lord Chatham without envying his friend, 
 — a brilliant proof of his noble disposition. 
 
 Lord Chesterfield, too little known in America, and only by 
 his lightest productions, — the Letters to his Son, — says, that 
 " Mr. Henry Fox had very great abilities and indefatigable in- 
 dustry in business ; great skill in managing (that is, corrupt- 
 ing) the House of Commons,' and a wonderful dexterity in at- 
 taching individuals to him ; and that he wisely and punctually 
 performed whatever he promised, and most liberally rewarded 
 their attachments and dependence. By these and other means 
 tbat can be easily imagined, he made himself many personal 
 friends and political dependants." But Chesterfield, that com- 
 petent judge of mankind and of motives, adds, " He had no 
 fixed principles either of religion or morality ; and was too 
 unwary in ridiculing and exploding them.'''' * 
 
 Mr. Heron, in a note on Junius, says, " Mr. Fox was one 
 of the most amiable of men in private life, — as a father, ten- 
 der, and attentive to educate his children upon that plan which 
 his notions of virtue, ability, and accomplishments, made him 
 believe to be best. His morality was that of honor ; his po- 
 litical principles had been learned in the school of Walpole." 
 It is probable that the eagle-eyed Chatham saw all this and 
 more, and therefore deemed him hardly fit to advise and direct 
 a Sovereign, whosejiigh office connected him with the church 
 as well as the state, and who was unusually attached to all the 
 forms and ceremonies of the Episcopal church. Chatham, how- 
 ever, employed him long in the highly responsible and confiden- 
 tial office of Secretary at War, during the whole of his famous 
 administration. George the Second was very desirous of secur- 
 ing the services of Mr. Fox in his cabinet. He used to say he 
 could understand all he said ; but that he could not always com- 
 prehend the meaning of the eloquent speeches made to him by 
 
 * Yet he kept in his family the Rev. Dr. Francis, the father of Sir 
 Philip, and the translator of Horace, for his Chaplain.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD HOLLAND. 321 
 
 his Secretaries and Minister, Lord Chesterfield and Mr.- Pitt. 
 When the latter was called to form an administration, he would 
 not admit Fox into the government, or associate with him in 
 council. He doubtless knew somewhat of his habits, or his 
 notions of things, unfitting him for a privy counsellor to such 
 an orthodox Prince as George the Third. Mr. Fox held the 
 lucrative and highly responsible post of Secretary at War, dur- 
 ing Pitt's renowned administration, to the entire satisfaction of 
 that minister. 
 
 When the new ministry was on the tapis, the gossiping Duke 
 of Newcastle asked Mr. Pitt, invidiously, " if he could bear to 
 act under Mr. Fox ? " Pitt replied, " Leave out under, my 
 Lord. It will never be a word between us. Mr. Fox and I 
 shall never quarrel." Just before Lord Bute abandoned the 
 helm, Henry Fox was created Lord Holland ; and then he 
 became, in a degree odious, from a popular suspicion, that he 
 was. the confidential friend of that very unpopular Scotch no- 
 bleman, and accordingly he was accused of malversation in of- 
 fice, and that charge was actually made in a very bold remon- 
 strance to the King from the City of London ; in which 
 Lord Holland was characterized as "a paymaster, the public 
 defaulter of unaccounted millions,' 1 '' on whom the King had con- 
 ferred public honors and employments, instead of punishment. 
 This solemn charge excited uneasiness in Junius, who says 
 to his printer, Woodfall, in a private letter, July 21, 1769, — 
 " 1 ivish Lord Holland may acquit himself with honor. If 
 his cause be good, he should, at once, have published that ac- 
 count.'''' 
 
 Upon this, Lord Holland came out in print, and justified 
 himself. To the foregoing passage, from the Letter of Ju- 
 nius, the editor of Woodfall's last edition says, " The editor 
 has already observed, in the Preliminary Essay, that Junius 
 appears to have uniformly entertained a good opinion of, or at 
 'east a partiality for, Lord Holland." The remark is not new ; 
 
 was noticed long ago. 
 41
 
 322 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 We shall call up but one more witness to prove the very- 
 friendly feeling of Junius towards the virtuous heathen, — I 
 mean the Roman Senator and paymaster. It bears the genu- 
 ine marks of Junius, which is more than can be said of several 
 Letters collected under the head of " Miscellaneous,'''' in Dr. 
 John Mason GoooVs edition of them, published by the Younger 
 Woodfall. 
 
 In October 1771, Junius was attacked and criticized by a 
 writer in " The Public Advertiser," who called himself " Jin 
 Old Correspondent" and who turned out to be Young Charles 
 Fox, son of Lord Holland, whom Junius condescended to no- 
 tice thus : 
 
 To the Printer of the Public Advertiser. 
 
 " Sir, — If the pert youth, who calls himself an old corre- 
 spondent, and who makes free with Junius, does not know the 
 difference between contact and collision, nor between the fric- 
 tion which produces the electrical powers, and the action of 
 the flint and steel which' produces sparks of fire, his ignorance 
 must be deplorable. But what right has he to change the 
 terms ? — Why contact, when Junius says collision ? When 
 this pert youth asks what virtue there is in Mr. Wilkes, I wish 
 he would tell us what fire there is in flint and steel. It is ac- 
 tion that makes them sparkle ; and if there be any thing com- 
 bustible in the passions of Mr. Nash, a single spark may set 
 him on fire. 
 
 " Again. Junius admits the strict right of pressing seamen, 
 but denies the King's right to arm his subjects in general, ex- 
 cepting in case of invasion. This, my pretty Black Boy 
 calls a retraction of Junius's first concession, and applies to 
 his aged father for an old woman's proverb. Junius speaks 
 of softening the symptoms of a disorder. The Black Boy 
 changes the terms again, and destroys the allusion. The rest 
 of his letter is of a piece with these instances ; a misrepresenta- 
 tion of Junius, equally pert, false, and stupid. Ex his disce 
 omnia.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD HOLLAND. 323 
 
 " I know nothing of Junius, [!] * but I see plainly, that he 
 has designedly spared Lord Holland and his family. Wheth- 
 er Lord Holland be invulnerable, or whether Junius should 
 be wantonly provoked, are questions worthy the Black Boy's 
 consideration. Anti-Fox." 
 
 Whatever impression this letter may make on others, I con- 
 fess it makes a strong one upon me. It appears to clinch 
 the nails already driven. Of the innumerable assailants of 
 Junius of every calibre, he could have swept them all aside 
 like so many insects ; but here was one written by a hoy, 
 crowded with misrepresentations and errors, which Junius 
 nevertheless deemed worthy of his deliberate notice ; for this 
 Letter is not a careless production ; and though the very ex- 
 tremity of the lower limb, we learn- — ex pede Herculem. The 
 whole composition affords internal evidence, that it was not 
 written to Lord Holland's pet alone, but to reach Little Pickle's 
 Papa also. The whole Letter is masterly among the familiar 
 ones. It gags the boy, and admonishes him not to exercise his 
 gosling pen upon the friend of his father and family. When we 
 consider the extremely faulty indulgence of Lord Holland to- 
 wards his brilliant son, Charles, the Letter of Anti-Fox must 
 have been not a little nettling, as it ridicules the ignorance of a 
 youth, whom the over fond father used to exhibit to his com- 
 pany as a prodigy of learning and talents. 
 
 If Junius saw that it was proper to check the too forward 
 boy, he took special care not to inflict a wound that would leave 
 a scar behind ; his stroke only affected the epidermis, a black 
 mark which the boy received from the black man, his doting 
 father, and which was therefore no moral stain upon the son.f 
 
 * Here it seems Junius knew nothing of himself! If the attentive 
 reader will put this and that together, there is little doubt but he 
 and the author will come out at the end of the same road; and, on 
 looking back upon it, he will wonder he never took it before. 
 
 f He who doubts this may read "Chrysal or the Adventures of a 
 Guinea" written by Charles Johnstone ; a coarse historical satire, in 
 which there are but two good characters to be found, namely, the 
 Right Hon. ffilliam Pitt and General Wolfe. Coarse as it is, it doubt-
 
 324 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 The language of the whole Letter was, — Be quiet, and pro- 
 voke not one who is able to demolish you, and who has no 
 disposition to trouble any of Lord Holland's family, vulnerable 
 as the head of it is.* 
 
 The Letter of Anti-Fox is worth preserving. It bears the 
 indubitable impress of Junius. It shows the writer's tender- 
 ness towards Lord Holland and his family, and his friendship 
 in condescending to check a youth, lest he should injure them 
 or himself. He lets them know, by his signature, and by his 
 allusion to his swarthy visage, that he knew him, which was 
 enough to arrest his hardihood. It is valuable on another ac- 
 count. It confirms what was said in our chapter on acknowl- 
 edged " Difficulties to be removed" where we said that Ju- 
 nius must have stipulated with his conscience not to boggle at 
 an untruth; and here we have a glaring instance of it ; for he 
 makes no scruple of saying the thing which was not. How 
 could he himself say, " I know nothing of Junius ? " 
 
 He must have reasoned thus with his conscience. — Strata- 
 gem is allowed to be the sublime part of war, where the hero 
 holds up an appearance of something which he does not intend, 
 while under that mask he secures an important object. If, 
 then, a consummate military commander may, unblamed, act 
 a lie in his plan of attack or defence, and call it by the soften- 
 ed name of ruse de guerre, why may not I write, occasionally, 
 
 less gave origin to the North Briton, and that to the celebrated Let- 
 ters of Junius. 
 
 * Robert Bisset, LL. D., in his History of George the Third, says, 
 (in a note, Vol. iv. p. 4,) that, when he first came to London, he was 
 struck with surprise at the free and easy terms in which some of the 
 butchers and lower adherents of Charles Fox accosted, at the hustings, 
 a personage of his transcendent superiority. It was in the endearing 
 style of fond comrades, on a footing of perfect equality, — " Charles ! 
 my sweet boy, — God bless your black face ! — don't be afraid, my lad, 
 we are your friends." No such thing ever occurred in Boston, demo- 
 crats as we are. No, — our elections are conducted with great order 
 and personal decorum ; and our legislative assemblies, in a style and 
 manner, which some of the European legislatures would do well if they 
 imitated.
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF BEDFORD. 325 
 
 a falsehood to elude detection, and secure my otherwise en- 
 dangered life, — I, who am a political reformer, — a redresser 
 of wrongs, and the champion of rights? Shall the bloody steel 
 alone advance in safety under an iEgis of disguise, and shall 
 the feebler pen be deprived of the like protection and safe- 
 guard ? 
 
 The Duke of Bedford. 
 
 As the rich Duke of Bedford has had a double portion of 
 Junius's scorn, let us inquire into the cause of it. 
 
 The Duke of Bedford, to whom Junius addressed the bit- 
 ter letter, dated the nineteenth of September, 1769, became, 
 from several causes, the richest subject in the realm. Accord- 
 ing to that letter, it appears, that his immense wealth, instead 
 of elevating him in the eyes of the considerate, and widening 
 his sphere of benevolent usefulness, operated, like an enormous 
 weight, to lower him down in the public estimation. Yet a 
 very rich man will always have very great influence in such a 
 community as England, as well as in our own. 
 
 This spoiled child of fortune was sent ambassador to 
 France by the Earl of Bute, on the very critical occa- 
 sion of the peace, and had the honor, or, according to the 
 popular voice, the infamy, of negotiating the inadequate peace 
 of 1763. On his return to England, he quarrelled with Lord 
 Bute, and grossly insulted the King. Such is the arrogance 
 of riches.* 
 
 John Russell, Duke of Bedford, had reason for boasting 
 of a long line of illustrious ancestry ; yet was he rendered 
 contemptible and even odious by the pen of Junius, who 
 speaks of him in a tone of horror. During the reigns of King 
 William and of Queen Anne, the head of the House of Rus- 
 
 * On one occasion, " the Duke demanded an audience of George 
 the Third ; reproached him, in plain terms, with his duplicity, baseness, 
 falsehood, treachery, and hypocrisy ; repeatedly gave him the lie ; and 
 left him in convulsions." These are the words of Junius, in a note to 
 his Twenty-third Letter.
 
 326 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 sell was distinguished among the most zealous of the whigs, 
 To this degenerate one, Junius speaks thus. " You are in- 
 deed a very considerable man. The highest rank, a splen- 
 did fortune, and a name glorious till it was yours, were suf- 
 ficient to have supported you with meaner abilities, than I 
 think you possess. From the first you derived a constitutional 
 claim to respect ; from the second, a natural extensive authori- 
 ty ; the last created a partial expectation of hereditary virtues. 
 The use you have made of these uncommon advantages 
 might have been more honorable to yourself, but could not be 
 more instructive to mankind." He then touches on several 
 little, disgraceful things, of a public, domestic, and middle 
 character ; among them he records the woful fact, that a 
 country attorney horsewhipped the Duke, with equal justice, 
 severity, and perseverance, on the race-ground at Litchfield. 
 Such was the general character of the representative of Lord 
 Bute at the court of Versailles, — a man, says Junius, who had 
 as little feeling for his own dignity, as for the welfare of his 
 country. 
 
 Mr. Pitt had no objection to a peace with France and Spain, 
 provided it were made on conditions consistent with the vigor 
 and success with which he had carried on the war. But what 
 must have been his mortification on seeing persons who were 
 never concerned or consulted in any negotiation before (as was 
 the case with the Duke of Bedford) assigning to the enemy, with 
 the " single stroke of his pen," conquests, which it had cost Lord 
 Chatham the deepest consideration to plan, and the greatest at- 
 tention and labor to carry into effect. Before the Duke was 
 sent to Paris, France had avowed herself ready to make very 
 many sacrifices to put an end to the war. The Duke of Choi- 
 seul, the French minister, put in operation all the arts of refine- 
 ment to lower the high demands of the haughty Mr. Pitt, who 
 always carried a lofty mind towards France and Spain. Know- 
 ing thoroughly the distressed condition of France, — her com- 
 merce destroyed, and her royal navy nearly annihilated, he saw 
 this was the critical time to establish the lasting pre-eminence of
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF BEDFORD. 327 
 
 Great Britain, before Spain and France united in their con- 
 templated family -compact. He knew that he could prescribe 
 the terms of peace and secure to himself the glory of it ; and 
 Lord Bute and those immediately about him knew it also ; but 
 the darling object of his Lordship was to prostrate the political 
 idol which the People, Parliament, and Fame, had set up ; and 
 by thus pulling down the fabric of Chatham's glory, they thought 
 to put an end to his mighty influence in the nation. To effect 
 this he formed connexions with those who hated and envied 
 the great man. The first movement was to pull from under 
 him such a substantial prop as the Right Hon. H. B. Legge, 
 Chancellor of the Exchequer. This dismissal was pointedly 
 reprehended by Junius. 
 
 Now, if Junius was Lord Chatham, we see ample reason, 
 not only for his contempt, but utter antipathy, towards the richest 
 Peer in England. We cannot otherwise account for his dwel- 
 ling, with hyena-like pleasure, on the rotten part of the Duke 
 of Bedford's character. He says of him, " Your patrons want- 
 ed an ambassador who would submit to make concessions, 
 without daring to insist upon any honorable conditions for his 
 Sovereign. Their business required a man, who had as little 
 feeling for his own dignity as for the welfare of his country ; 
 and they found him in the first rank of nobility. Belleish, 
 Goree, Guadaloupe, St. Lucia, Martinique, the Fishery, and 
 the Havanna, are glorious monuments of your Grace's talents 
 for negotiation. My Lord, we are too well acquainted with 
 your pecuniary character, to think it possible that so many 
 public sacrifices should have been made without some private 
 compensation. Your conduct carries with it an internal evi- 
 dence beyond all the legal proofs of a court of justice." 
 
 Still this branch of the noble House of Russell had great in- 
 fluence, by means of his riches and numerous dependents, 
 passing down through rills and runnels, even to gutters ; in so 
 much that Lord Chatham, when about to form a new adminis- 
 tration in 1766, deemed it politic to engage the interest of the 
 Duke of Bedford and his numerous friends. Lord dies-
 
 328 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 terfield speaks thus of it to his son. " Eight or nine peo- 
 ple of some consequence have resigned their employments; 
 upon which Lord Chatham made overtures to the Duke of 
 Bedford and his people, but they could by no means agree; 
 and his Grace went the next day, full of wrath, to Woburn 
 [his country residence] ; so that negotiation is entirely at an 
 end. People wait to see who Lord Chatham will take next; 
 for some he must have ; even he cannot be alone contra mun- 
 dum.'''' But the truth must be told. " That superiority of mind, 
 and perhaps the gout, which had denied him the usual habits 
 of intercourse with the world, gave an air of austerity to his 
 manners, and precluded the policy of a convenient condescen- 
 sion to the minutia? of politeness, and fascinating powers of ad- 
 dress, when most needed." * 
 
 That (he general character of the Duke of Bedford was 
 very exceptionable we believe ; but the particular instances of 
 it we venture not to record at this distance of time and space. 
 In the height of religious or political controversy, what prudent 
 man will venture to fix the character of any leader ? We may 
 relate what was said, and leave it to truth and time. The 
 caustic Junius treats with ridicule his Grace the Duke of 
 Grafton ; but he speaks of the Duke of Bedford with horror, 
 and exclaims, " Whither shall this unhappy old man retire ? 
 Can he remain in the metropolis, where his life has been so 
 often threatened, and his palace so often attacked? If he re- 
 turns to Woburn, scorn and mockery await him. He must 
 create a solitude round his estate, if he would avoid the face 
 of reproach and derision. At Plymouth his destruction would 
 be more than probable ; at Exeter, inevitable. No honest 
 Englishman will ever forget his attachment, nor any honest 
 Scotchman forgive his treachery, to Lord Bute. At every 
 town he enters, he must change his liveries and his name. 
 Whichever way he flies, the hue and cry of the country pur- 
 sues him. As well might Vekres return to Sicily." What a 
 portrait ! 
 
 * Anecdotes of the Life of Chatham.
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF BEDFORD. 329 
 
 This was a critical period in the history of George the 
 Third, and of the great Statesman whom we have presumed to 
 celebrate. Lord Chatham's ill health, aside from mere gout, 
 affected his lofty spirit. He had now attained the critical 
 place in the ladder of human life, and at this climacterical 
 round of it he suffered like a common man ; yet he after- 
 wards blazed out brighter than ever in the House of Lords. 
 Three years after this period, Junius addressed that very se- 
 vere letter to his Grace of Bedford, from which we have 
 made some extracts. Woodfall was afraid to publish it ; but 
 was encouraged to it by a private letter from Junius in these 
 words. " As to you, it is clearly my opinion that you have 
 nothing to fear from the Duke of Bedford. I reserve some 
 things to awe him, in case he should think of bringing you be- 
 fore the House of Lords. I am sure 1 can threaten him pri- 
 vately with such a storm as would make him tremble even in 
 his grave ! " 
 
 Now, what man, what subject can be named, that could pos- 
 sibly have excited in Lord Chatham more resentment and dis- 
 gust, than this same Duke of Bedford? 
 
 In the peace he made, he gave up those West-India islands 
 enumerated in the bitter epistle already noticed, — the valuable 
 fruits of Lord Chatham's labors and success. We therefore per- 
 ceive ample reason for keen, and, one would think, lasting resent- 
 ment towards the Duke ; insomuch that we cannot readily be- 
 lieve, that a very able, ambitious, renowned, and eloquent man, 
 situated and circumstanced as Earl Chatham really was, would 
 go down quietly to the grave without leaving behind some written 
 memorial of those bereavements and the cause of them, with- 
 out giving some vent to his indignant feelings through his pen, 
 and that too in the severe and acrimonious style of the Let- 
 ter from which we have made extracts, in order to brand 
 the man, who, by " a single stroke of his pen," assigned to 
 the French and Spaniards conquests which had cost the minis- 
 ter and the nation such unparalleled exertions to achieve. 
 There is yet another, and to us mortifying view of the subject. 
 
 42
 
 330 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Lord Chatham could not but have known the reputation, nay, 
 more, the character of the Duke of Bedford. We say the 
 character, that which marks the man, and never fails to show 
 itself in spite of hypocrisy, be his reputation whatever it may. 
 We overrate the character of Chatham, if he was not a per- 
 sonage who looked through reputation, or what others thought, 
 to those indelible marks which stamp the man good, great, and 
 generous, or mean, sordid, and vicious. The vulgar are warp- 
 ed by name, by title, by vast riches, and their splendid concomi- 
 tants ; but the deep impress of the Duke's personal character 
 must have been fixed in the mind of our great statesman even at 
 the time when impaired health and gloomy ideas pressed heavily 
 upon it at Bath. It appears therefore strange, passing strange, 
 that Lord Chatham could ever, for a moment, have felt the 
 least wish to associate himself in office with any Peer, how- 
 ever high in rank or abounding in riches, with such a cast of 
 character as that which common fame attributed to John Rus- 
 sell, Duke of Bedford. How could a man of Chatham's well 
 known character, — integrity itself personified, — endure to be 
 yoked to the same car with one staggering through the world 
 under such a weight of odium as that laid upon the Duke of 
 Bedford ; a man base enough, fool enough, to treat his Sove- 
 reign in a worse manner than any genuine nobleman would in- 
 dulge towards an equal ? 
 
 We can account for Lord Chatham's overture to the Duke of 
 Bedford, only by supposing that he hoped to recover sufficient 
 health to enable him shortly to exert himself once more in the 
 cause he had long espoused. Otherwise we should be puzzled 
 to explain how he should risk roiling the fountain-head, by 
 placing near it such a foul character ; ade J that would have 
 justified Sir Philip Francis in saying of Lord Chatham, whom he 
 almost idolized, that he was " a great, illustrious, faulty human 
 being." But as it stood without explanation, it doubtless opened 
 a wide avenue for objurgation. His admiring biographer says, 
 this was the least glorious period of his life. Now how hap- 
 pened it, that this very conspicuous and influential character
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF GRAFTON. 33 1 
 
 escaped the lash of Junits, see ; n?: his Lordship's bare back 
 lay so fair for it ? How came the great file-leader of whig- 
 gism to escape, in this instance, the animadversion of the keen 
 censor of the age, the fastidious arbiter morum, the eagle-eyed 
 Junius? — of him, who at his outset denounced Mr. Pitt and 
 Lord Camden, a> risking the integrity of the British empire 
 merely to destroy George Grenville as a minister ? He, who 
 can explain this silence, and that denunciation from the same 
 pen, upon any other hypothesis than our own, merits from the 
 author the homage due to a Magnus Apollo. 
 
 The Duke of Grafton 
 
 Having called forth a treble portion of the vituperation of 
 Junius, we are now to search out the hidden cause of it. 
 
 We understand clearly, why the Earl of Chatham hated 
 the Duke of Bedford, who did all in his power to demolish 
 the triumphal arch which Fame had erected to the honor of 
 that great man ; but we do not see so distinctly how Junius, 
 upon our hypothesis, had equal reason for detesting the Duke 
 of Grafton as a politician. He appears rather a weak and 
 trifling man, than a very wicked or dangerous one ; hardly 
 worth the powder and shot expended upon him. Or was it to 
 show that a mere effigy of a Prime Minister was wanted by a 
 Sovereign determined to be his own ? 
 
 Junius, under the signature of Atticus, October 19, 1768, 
 says, " When the Duke of Grafton first entered into office, it 
 was the fashion of the times to suppose that young men might 
 have wisdom without experience. They thought so themselves, 
 and the most important affairs of this country were committed 
 to the first trial of their abilities. His Grace had honorably 
 fleshed his maiden sword in the field of opposition, and had 
 gone through all the discipline of the minority with credit. 
 He dined at Wild man's, railed at favorites, looked up to Lord 
 Chatham with astonishment, and was the declared advocate of 
 Mr. Wilkes. It afterwards pleased bis Grace to enter into ad-
 
 332 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ministration with his friend Lord Rockingham, and, in a very- 
 little time, it pleased his Grace to abandon him. He then ac- 
 cepted the Treasury upon terms which Lord Temple had dis- 
 dained. For a short time, his submission to Lord Chatham 
 was unlimited. He could not answer a letter without Lord 
 Chatham's permission. I presume he was then learning his 
 trade, for he soon set up for himself. Until he declared him- 
 self minister, his character had been but little understood. 
 From that moment a system of conduct, directed by passion 
 and caprice, not only reminds us that he is a young man, but 
 a young man without solidity of judgment. One day he de- 
 sponds and threatens to resign. The next, he finds his blood 
 heated, and swears to his friends he is determined to go on. 
 In his public measures we have seen no proof either of ability 
 or consistency. The stamp act had been repealed (no matter 
 how unadvisedly) under the preceding administration. The 
 colonies had reason to triumph, and were returning to good 
 humor. The point was decided, when this young man thought 
 proper to revive it. [Why not say the King thought proper 
 to revive it, and the young Duke was disposed to gratify him 
 in that and in every thing else ?] Without either plan or ne- 
 cessity, he adopts the spirit of Mr. Grenville's measures, and 
 renews the question of taxation in a form more odious and less 
 effectual, than that of the law which had been repealed. 
 . " His standing foremost in the prosecution of Mr. Wilkes, if 
 former declarations and connexions be considered, is base and 
 contemptible. The man whom he now brands with treason 
 and blasphemy, but a few years ago was the Duke of Grafton's 
 friend, nor is his identity altered, except by his misfortunes. 
 In the last instance of his Grace's judgment and consistency, 
 we see him, after trying and deserting every party, throw him- 
 self into the arms of a set of men, whose political principles 
 he had always pretended to abhor." 
 
 This is indeed an admirable portrait of a weakish, inconsist- 
 ent, ignorant, and presumptuous weathercock of a young no- 
 bleman, who injudiciously grasped more than he could hold,
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF GRAFTON. 333 
 
 yet was sufficiently respectable as to rank to be a fit and gaudy 
 tool for the secret and irresponsible cabinet of that day to work 
 withal. The same Letter contains sketches of the characters 
 of Lords North, Shelburne, Hillsborough, Granby, Weymouth, 
 and Gower, with a very few words, not three lines, and those 
 obscure, on poor Lord Chatham, as too much worn to the 
 stump, like an old broom, to merit notice.. He intimates 
 that he had much to say of that forlorn nobleman, but for- 
 bears, because " it were inhuman to persecute, when Provi- 
 dence has marked out the example to mankind." Here the 
 chalk, from some cause or other, possibly the gout, fell from 
 the hand of Junius ! and left the portrait for posterity to fin- 
 ish, and — to venerate ! At about six weeks' interval, he 
 writes again under the signature of Lucius, and says, " I 
 think I have now named all the cabinet but the Earl of Chat- 
 ham. His infirmities have forced him into retirement, where, 
 I presume, he is ready to suffer, with a sullen submission, eve*- 
 ry insult and disgrace that can be heaped upon a miserable, 
 decrepid, worn-out old man." 
 
 Junius, under his own proper signature, says to the Duke 
 of Grafton, " You had already taken your degrees with credit 
 in those schools in which the English nobility are formed to 
 virtue, when you were introduced to Lord Chatham's protec- 
 tion. From Newmarket, White's, and the opposition, he gave 
 you to the world with an air of popularity, which young men 
 usually set out with, and seldom preserve ; grave and plausible 
 enough to be thought fit for business ; too young for treachery ; 
 and, in short, a patriot of no unpromising expectations. Lord 
 Chatham was the earliest object of your political wonder and at- 
 tachment, yet you deserted him upon the first hopes that offered 
 of an equal share of power with Lord Rockingham. When the 
 Duke of Cumberland's first negotiation failed, and when the fa- 
 vorite was pushed to the last extremity, you saved him by joining 
 with an administration in which Lord Chatham had refused to 
 engage. Still, however, he was your friend, and you are yet 
 to explain to the world why you consented to act without him ;
 
 334 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 or why, after uniting with Lord Rockingham, you deserted 
 and betrayed him also. 
 
 " Lord Chatham formed his last administration upon prin- 
 ciples which you certainly concurred in, or you could never 
 have been placed at the head of the treasury. By deserting 
 those principles, and by acting in direct contradiction to them, 
 in which he fomid you were secretly supported in the closet, 
 you soon forced him to leave you to yourself, and to withdraw 
 his name from an administration which had been formed on 
 the credit of it." 
 
 Who could this Junius be, who had such an intimate knowl- 
 edge of the mind of Chatham and the heart of Grafton ? Was 
 he some aerial being, superior in essence to ourselves, who was 
 thus capable of entering the minds and hearts of men, so as to 
 even know their motives, views, and expectations ? Or was 
 this seemingly magical power no other than that which springs 
 from the operation of a very strong mind over a weak one ? 
 Does our hypothesis savour of a creature of the imagination 
 merely, or has it a real prototype ? 
 
 Junius says, in the same- Letter, " Your Grace's public 
 conduct as a minister, is but the counterpart of your private 
 history ; — the same inconsistency, the same contradictions. In' 
 America we trace you, from the first opposition to the stamp 
 act on principles of convenience, to Mr. Pitt's surrender of the 
 right ; — then forward to Lord Rockingham's surrender of the 
 fact ; — then forward to taxation with Mr. Townshend ; and in 
 the last instance, from the gentle Conway's undetermined dis- 
 cretion, to blood and compulsion with the Duke of Bedford." 
 
 Junius, in a Letter to the Printer,* after describing the at- 
 tachments which the Duke of Grafton had formed, broken off, 
 or betrayed, says, that " he made himself accessary to the un- 
 timely death of Mr. Yorke, — I say accessary, because he was 
 certainly not the principal actor in that most atrocious business. 
 After all, when it was impossible for him to add to his guilti- 
 
 * Under the signature of Domitian.
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF GRAFTON. 335 
 
 ness, a panic seizes him ; he begins to measure his expecta- 
 tions by the sense of his deserts ; a visionary gibbet appears 
 before his eyes ; he flies from his post, surrenders to another 
 the reward due to his honorable services, and leaves his king 
 and country to extricate themselves, if they can, from the dis- 
 tress and confusion in which he had involved them. 
 
 " Tiie danger, as he conceives, being now pretty well over, 
 what plan do you think this worthy, resolute young man pur- 
 sues at present ? While he was First Lord of the Treasury, 
 it is well known (and I speak from knowledge when I assert) 
 that he never treated Lord North even with the common ci- 
 vility due to his clerk. I appeal to Lord North himself, and 
 to every clerk in the treasury (particularly to Grey Cooper), 
 whether it was not known to be a difficult matter for the Chan- 
 cellor of the Exchequer to obtain an audience even of Mr. 
 Thomas Bradshaw. Would you believe it possible, Sir, that, 
 after these facts, this very Duke of Grafton can be so de- 
 graded, so lost to every sensation of pride, of dignity, and de- 
 corum, as to be a suppliant beggar for employment to this very 
 Lord North ? Yet so it is ; and if I were to tell you with 
 what circumstances of humiliation he accompanies his suit to 
 that minister, the narrative would be nauseous and fulsome. 
 He is so very impatient to be First Lord of the Admiralty, that 
 Lord North can hardly keep the fawning creature from under 
 his feet. Now, Sir, let any man living, I care not whether 
 friend or foe, review this summary of his life, and tell us in 
 what instance he has discovered a single ray of wisdom, solidi- 
 ty, or judgment. 
 
 " As to the other test of his abilities, I mean his talent for 
 talking in public, I can speak with greater precision, for I 
 have often had the honor of hearing him. With a very solemn 
 and plausible delivery, he has a set of thoughts, or rather of 
 words resembling thoughts, which may be applied indifferently, 
 and with equal success to all possible subjects. There is this 
 singular advantage in his Grace's method of discourse, that, if 
 it were once admitted that he spoke well upon any one given
 
 336 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 topic, it would inevitably follow, that he was qualified to deliver 
 himself happily upon every subject whatever. He would be ip- 
 so facto an universal orator. Accept of the following specimen 
 of his Grace's eloquence, and I promise you, you will be as 
 well able to judge of his oratorial powers, as if you had heard 
 him a thousand times. 
 
 " ' My Lords, — When I came into the House this day, I 
 protest I did not think it possible, — indeed I had formed in my 
 own breast a resolution to the contrary, — but, my Lords, I 
 really thought it impossible, that I should be compelled to 
 trouble your Lordships with my poor thoughts upon the ques- 
 tion before your Lordships. I never do presume to trouble 
 your Lordships at any time without feeling a pain, an internal 
 regret, — a degree of uneasiness which, I can with truth assure 
 your Lordships (and I flatter myself that I shall find credit 
 with every noble Lord who hears me), it is not easy for me 
 to have the honor of describing to your Lordships. My Lords, 
 I am called upon, as I humbly conceive, and I appeal boldly, 
 not only to the candor of noble Lords, but to your Lordships' 
 severer judgment, whether I am not compelled to declare my 
 sentiments, as explicitly as I now do, upon the motion upon 
 your Lordships' table. Upon this ground, my Lords, I meet 
 the noble Lord without fear, though I respect his superior 
 abilities, and I pledge myself to your Lordships for the truth of 
 what I assert. Otherwise, my Lords, if facts were not as I 
 have stated them, where will your Lordships draw the Hue ? 
 My Lords, I am really astonished, — yet indeed, my Lords, I 
 ought not to be astonished. The question has been handled 
 with so much ability by other noble Lords, that 1 shall con- 
 tent myself with this simple, unadorned declaration of my 
 opinion. Yet I could quote cases, my Lords, which I acci- 
 dentally met with this morning in the course of my reading, 
 which, I doubt not, would convince your Lordships, if convic- 
 tion were the question. But 1 fear I have troubled your Lord- 
 ships too long ; I shall therefore return to the leading propo- 
 sition, which I had the honor of setting out with, and ?nove for 
 an immediate adjournment? "
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF GRAFTON. 337 
 
 Should it be susi ected, that this is not a correct likeness, 
 but a caricature of the noble Duke, it must still be allowed that 
 it is not a vulgar sketch. Leo cognoscitur pede. The same 
 personage says, in all sobriety, in his first and masterly Letter, 
 '•' The finances of a nation, sinking under its. debts and ex- 
 penses, are committed to a young nobleman already ruined by 
 play. Introduced to act under the auspices of Lord Chatham, 
 and left at the head of affairs by that nobleman's retreat, he 
 became minister by accident; but, deserting the principles and 
 professions which gave him a moment's popularity, we see 
 him, from every honorable engagement to the public, an apos- 
 tate by design." 
 
 In a note to this text, Junius says, " The Duke of Grafton 
 took the office of secretary of state with an engagement to sup- 
 port the Marquis of Rockingham's administration. He re- 
 signed, however, in a little time, under pretence that he could 
 not act without Lord Chatham, nor bear to see Mr. Wilkes 
 ♦ abandoned; but that, under Lord Chatham, he would act in 
 any office. This was the signal of Lord Rockingham's dis- 
 mission. When Lord Chatham came in, the Duke got pos- 
 session of the treasury. Reader," says Junius, " mark the 
 consequence ! " He snapped his finger in defiance of the 
 great statesman and his quondam patron, thus evincing, that 
 he was a minister exactly fitted for a King, who may be desig- 
 nated maximus in minimis. 
 
 Lord Chatham, in a speech delivered March 2, 1770, ridi- 
 culed the idea of the Duke of Grafton's having been minister, 
 and laughed at his presumption in thinking so. He spoke of 
 " the secret influence of an invisible power ; of a favorite (Bute), 
 whose pernicious counsels had occasioned all the present un- 
 happiness and disturbances in the nation, and who, notwith- 
 standing he was abroad,* was at this moment as potent as 
 
 * Although Lord Bute went to France with a view to lessen the 
 clamor against him, his influence was little or not at all diminished by 
 his absence. The nation felt it with disgust. 
 
 43
 
 338 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ever ; — that Mazarine absent was Mazarine still. He had 
 ruined every plan for the public good, and betrayed every man 
 who had taken a responsible office. There wcs no safely, no 
 security against his power and malignity. The transaction of 
 the late peace was a proof of his influence ; — that measure was 
 his. He himself had been duped ; he confessed it with sor- 
 row ; he had been duped when he least expected treachery, 
 at a time when the prospect was fair, and when the appear- 
 ances of confidence were strong ; — in particular, at the time 
 when he was taken ill, and obliged to go to Bath for a short 
 week ; — he had, before he set out, formed, with great pains, 
 attention, and deliberation, schemes highly interesting and of 
 the utmost importance to this country ; — schemes, which had 
 been approved in council, and to which the King himself had 
 given his consent. But when he returned, he found that his 
 plans had all vanished into thin air. 
 
 " Raising his voice, he declared in a dignified tone, ' that this 
 country was sold at the late peace ; that we were sold by the 
 Court of Turin to the Court of France. [That Court being 
 the go-between in the preliminary articles of the peace between 
 France and England.] When I was earnestly called upon 
 for the public service, I came from Somersetshire with wings 
 of zeal. I consented to preserve a peace which I abominated ; 
 — a peace I would not make, but would preserve when made. 
 I undertook to support a government by law, but to shield 
 no man from public justice. These terms were accepted, 
 I thought with sincerity accepted. I own I was credulous ; 
 I was duped, I was deceived ; for I soon found that there was 
 no original administration to be suffered in this country. The 
 same secret influence still prevailed, which had put an end to 
 all the successive administrations as soon as they opposed, or 
 declined to act under it? 
 
 " Here the Duke of Grafton jumped up and exclaimed, ' J 
 rise to defend the King ! The words which have been spoken 
 are only the effects of a distempered mind, brooding over its 
 own discontent.'
 
 NOTICE OF THE DUKE OF GRAFTON. 339 
 
 "To which Lord Chatham calmly replied, i I rise neither to 
 deny, to retract, nor to explain away the words I have spoken." 1 
 He then spoke of the obstacles and difficulties which attended 
 every great and public measure, which, he said, were suggest- 
 ed, nourished, and supported by that secret influence he had 
 mentioned, first by secret treachery, then by official influence, 
 and afterwards in public councils. ' A long train of these 
 practices,' said he, ' has at length unwillingly convinced me, 
 that there is something behind the Throne greater than the 
 King himself. As to the noble Duke, there was in his con- 
 duct, from the time of my being taken ill, a gradual deviation 
 from every thing that had been settled and agreed to by his 
 Grace, both as to measures and to men, till at last there were 
 not left two planks together of the ship which had been origi- 
 nally launched.' " * 
 
 Mr. Nichols, whose father was Archiater to George the 
 Second, says, "that, from the commencement of the reign of 
 George the Third, a struggle had existed between the King's 
 personal wishes and the opinions of his ostensible ministers ; 
 that the two first wishes, which he seems to have entertained, 
 were to break the power of the Pelham faction, and to restore 
 peace ; that the instrument which he employed to effec- 
 tuate his objects was unfortunately chosen ; that the Earl of Bute 
 was not qualified to be a minister ; " and he adds, " that from 
 the time of his removal we may date the establishment of the 
 double cabinet, that is, secret advisers, and ostensible ministers." 
 He says further, " that the King dismissed George Grenville 
 because he found him not sufficiently subservient to his views, 
 and Lord Rockingham because he repealed the stamp act ; 
 and that when the Duke of Grafton was appointed minister, 
 it was understood that he was to act under the guidance of 
 the Earl of Chatham. But soon after the establishment of 
 this ministry, and while Lord Chatham was sick and absent 
 from council, the King contrived to have the question of taxing 
 
 * From the London Museum and Almon's Anecdotes of Lord Chat- 
 ham.
 
 340 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the American colonies revived; and, by playing man against 
 man and faction against faction, he at length obtained his 
 wishes ; and the American colonies found themselves reduced 
 to the alternative of unconditional submission, or explicit and 
 avowed resistance." Mr. Nichols adds, " They chose the lat- 
 ter;" and "while the King was pursuing this object of 
 reviving the dispute with America, he seems to have employed 
 that maxim of the politician, Divide et impera, with much dex- 
 terity. The late Earl of Shelburne told a friend of mine," 
 says Mr. Nichols, " that the King possessed one art beyond 
 any man he had ever known ; for that, by the familiarity of 
 his intercourse, he obtained your confidence, procured from 
 you your opinion of different public characters, and then avail- 
 ed himself of this knowledge to sow dissension." 
 
 How far this corresponds with a passage in a private letter 
 from John Wilkes to Junius, of September 12, 1771, is left 
 to the feelings and judgment of each reader ; viz. " Lord 
 Chatham said to me ten years ago, ****** \ s the falsest 
 hypocrite in Europe. I must hate the man as much as even 
 Junius can, for through this whole reign almost it has been 
 ********* versus Wilkes. This conduct will probably 
 make it Wilkes versus ******** *." | 
 
 " It is understood," says Mr. Heron, " that if the Duke of 
 Grafton had remained faithful to Lord Chatham, had scorned 
 all political association equally with the Bedford party as with 
 those who called themselves the King's friends," the combi- 
 nation of the Pitt and Grenville with the JVewcastle and Rock- 
 ingham Whigs, had been, ere that time, triumphant ; and the 
 King would have been obliged to resign the reigns of his gov- 
 ernment into their hands, upon their own conditions. The 
 
 f I have seen these blanks filled up in print ; but do not choose to 
 reprint guess work, especially of a paragraph written by a man whose 
 folly led liim to set up a printing-press in his own house to print all the 
 proceedings of the administration against him, price one guinea! and 
 who, contrary to the advice of his best friends, reprinted all the forty- 
 Jive numbers of his North Briton.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD AMHERST. 341 
 
 prevention of this was the great crime of the Duke of Grafton, 
 in the eyes of the Whigs. . And Mr. Heron adds, " This was 
 
 the CAUSE of JUNIUS'S ABHORRENCE of /i2OT." [NOTE to his 
 
 Fifty-fifth Letter. 
 
 Lord Amherst 
 
 Is the last personage we shall cite to prove the consimilarity 
 in opinion between Junius and Lord Chatham, respecting the 
 characters and conduct of men. 
 
 " Jeffery Amherst, the descendant of an old and most re- 
 spectable family iu the county of Kent, was born on the 29th 
 of January, 1717. At a very early age, he devoted himself 
 to the profession of arms. He received an ensign's commis- 
 sion in the guards when not more than fourteen years old. 
 At the age of twenty-four he was made aid-de-camp to General 
 Ligonier, and in that capacity was present at the battles of 
 Dettingen, Fontenoy, and Rocoux. After this he was ad- 
 mitted upon the staff of the Duke of Cumberland, and was 
 engaged in the fatal battles of Lafeld and Hastenbeck. In 
 the year 1756, he was appointed to command the fifteenth 
 regiment of foot,- and in two years more obtained the rank of 
 major-general. Mr. Pitt, ever attentive to the character of the 
 officers he employed, saw that the qualities of General Am- 
 herst rendered him a proper person to command the army in 
 North America. He was accordingly appointed, and the bril- 
 liant operations of the campaign amply confirmed ihe high 
 opinion entertained of him by Mr. Pitt. General Amherst, 
 although a firm disciplinarian, was ever the soldier's friend. 
 He was a man of strict economy, of a collected and temperate 
 mind, and in the whole of his conduct appears to have been 
 animated by a just sense of what was due to his country." * 
 
 * History of the Right Hon. William Pitt, End of Chatham, by the 
 Rev. Francis Thackeray, Vol. I. Sir Jeffery Amherst was the most 
 popular military officer ever sent from Britain into these colonies. I
 
 342 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Mr. Pitt, in a letter to General Amherst, of October 24, 
 1760, says, " I cannot sufficiently express to you the satis- 
 faction of his Majesty on the further successes of his arras un- 
 der your command ; " and closes with saying, " I cannot 
 conclude without adding my most hearty congratulations on 
 the great honor you have acquired, and assuring you of the 
 sincere part I shall take in every thing that can contribute to 
 the increase thereof." And in a subsequent letter he says, 
 " I have the further pleasure to acquaint you, that all ranks 
 and degrees of people here have unanimously testified their 
 sense of the many great services you have rendered your King 
 and country." Mr. Pitt was always very frugal in bestowing 
 high praises upon officers in his service. 
 
 The historian just quoted,* who is remarkably cautious of 
 imputing blame to men in very high stations, says, that " the 
 infirmities of Lord Chatham [in 1768] still prevented him 
 from emerging from retirement, and compelled him to submit, 
 in sullen submission, to many severe outrages upon his feelings 
 and his friendships." Among these he mentions an event 
 " which was," he says, " certainly calculated to wound the 
 high spirit of Lord Chatham. As a reward for the important 
 services performed by General Amherst, — [nothing less than the 
 reduction of Montreal and all Canada ; or, in a word, wresting 
 from the hands of France the whole of her power in North 
 America;] which services appeared still greater when contrast- 
 ed with the untoward events under General Braddock, Lord 
 Loudon, and General Abercrombie ; — for these brilliant deeds, 
 General Amherst was appointed Governor of Virginia, with 
 the privilege of residing in England, while his Lieutenant 
 
 well remember when the most frequent signs hung out at the inns, 
 taverns, and smaller houses of entertainment in America, were por- 
 traits of the Right Hon. TFilliam Pitt, the King of Prussia, and 
 General Jlmherst. One of General Wolfe remains in its original place, 
 at this day, in Newburyport, while the bust of William Pitt, presented 
 by Dr. Franklin, in the year 1770, adorns the spacious Library of 
 the University of Cambridge. 
 * Thackeray.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD AMHERST. 343 
 
 dwelt in the < ancient dominion.' Mr. Pitt had communi- 
 cated these gracious marks of his sovereign's favor to the 
 General, who, during several years, had enjoyed them with- 
 out dispute. But disturhances," says the historian, " had 
 since arisen in America ; and it was deemed necessary by 
 Lord Hillsborough, the minister who had been recently made 
 for the new office of Secretary for the Colonies, that there 
 should be a resident Governor in Virginia. It might be sup- 
 posed, that one, so honorable and so disinterested as Sir Jeffery 
 Amherst had proved himself to be, would not oppose his own 
 accommodation to the welfare of his country, but would consent 
 to waive his claim of non-residence, and either repair to the 
 government, or, upon a just compensation, relinquish it to 
 another. Such a proposition was accordingly made to him by 
 the ministry [the Duke of Grafton's,] and at first he appeared 
 to acquiesce in the propriety of the measure, [because he 
 thought it might be for the good of the country.] Unfortu- 
 nately," says the historian, " he subsequently learned, that, be- 
 fore he himself had been consulted, his government had been 
 promised to Lord Botetourt. Indignant at such treatment, 
 he demanded an audience of his Majesty, and tendered the 
 resignation of his regiments." 
 
 " I have already expressed my astonishment," says Mr. 
 Thackeray, " that Lord Chatham should so long have con- 
 sented to form a part, even nominally, of an administration, 
 whose sentiments and proceedings were so opposite to his 
 own." — " Whatever were heretofore his motives for remaining 
 in office, the recent conduct of the ministry was so gross an 
 outrage upon his feelings, both as it regarded his public meas- 
 ures and his private friendships, that he now felt himself com- 
 pelled to resign." This had a special reference to the 
 ill treatment of General Amherst. Did Lord Chatham sit 
 quietly under this gross outrage of his feelings ? — If he did, 
 Junius did not. 
 
 In August, 17G8, a letter appeared in the Public Advertiser, 
 under the signature of Valerius, who, Mr. Woodfall the
 
 344 concerning;junius and his letters. 
 
 younger assures us, was Junius himself. The writer say", 
 " Amidst the general indignation which has been excited by 
 the marked affront lately put upon Sir Jeffery Amherst, it is 
 odd to find people puzzling themselves about the motives 
 which have actuated administration in this extraordinary pro- 
 cedure. Nothing is more short and easy, than the solution of 
 this affected difficulty. They were ordered to act in this man- 
 ner. [By the boyish Duke of Grafton ? — No, — by his master.'] 
 " The public knows, and can know, no other reason. The 
 ministry know, and desire to know, no other reason. They 
 have not the slightest quarrel with Sir Jeffery Amherst. They 
 have not the most trivial regard for Lord Botetourt. Some 
 of them are known even to hate his Lordship; the rest are 
 scarcely acquainted with him ; but they have received the or- 
 der, and that is enough for them. Their whole political sys- 
 tem is wrapped up in one short maxim, — 
 
 " My author and disposer 1 what tliou bidst 
 Unargued I obey ! " * 
 
 Leaving Valerius, alias Junius, for a moment, let us say 
 a few words on the government of Virginia. 
 
 The original idea appears to have been that of a Prefect or 
 Governor-General of the Colonies ; for Virginia was the 
 original name of an immense region, including nearly all the 
 British claims in America. Whether Virginia, so called by 
 the English in honor of their Virgin Queen, was a favorite ter- 
 ritory in the eyes of Lord Chatham, or whether he had any 
 particular views in wishing to place his favorite General there, 
 we are not prepared to say ; and we only guess, that he may 
 have wished to balance the colonial, democratical influence be- 
 tween New England and Virginia, should ever one or the oth- 
 er incline to independency. The first settlers of Virginia ap- 
 pear to have brought over with them as much of the Eng- 
 lish spirit of freedom as our forefathers in New-England, 
 with all their boasted Puritanism, making due allowance for 
 
 * Milton.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD AMHERST. 345 
 
 the former as Episcopalians. The settlers of Virginia were 
 authorized, by their charters, to govern themselves accord- 
 ing to their own discretion. They were allowed to coin 
 money, and to possess all the liberties and franchises of na- 
 tive Britons. The civil power was, at the beginning, de- 
 puted to a council appointed by the crown. They soon, 
 however, elected a House of Representatives or House of 
 Burgesses, which continued down to the period of our na- 
 tional independency. But they were not watched and over- 
 looked by the jealous eye of the mother-country, as we in 
 New England were. The powers, civil and ecclesiastical, had 
 a better opinion of the obedience of Roman Catholics, and 
 their first cousins, the English Episcopalians ; for Virginia, in- 
 cluding the territory of Maryland, was settled by Episcopalians 
 and Roman Catholics, both, in a degree, slaves by system, 
 compared with the almost Indian freedom of the New England 
 Independents, who were disposed to acknowledge no other 
 Sovereign than King Jesus. That detached portion of Vir- 
 ginia, called Maryland, had a charter from King Charles the 
 First, with more unlimited powers than even the original do- 
 minion. It expressly stated, that they should be free from all 
 impositions of taxes and duties by Parliament. They actually 
 were allowed to exercise, under a Roman Catholic Governor, 
 all the high powers of a sovereign state. Virginia possessed 
 as much of the essential privileges of independence as Mas- 
 sachusetts, if not more. Their colonial covenants partook 
 more of treaties between two separate powers, than charters 
 granted by a sovereign state to a dependent colony. They 
 wisely enjoyed their freedom without boasting of it, or talking 
 too much about it. They, however, unfortunately admitted 
 the slavery of the Africans, in which they were encouraged by 
 the mother country, while all New England wisely preserved 
 herself free from it. 
 
 44
 
 346 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 After George the Third came to the crown, when John 
 Stuart, Earl of Bute, Lord Mansfield, Lord Granville,* 
 Archbishop Seeker, and the followers of the Princess Dowager 
 of Wales, influenced the councils of the young monarch, ft 
 seemed voted and resolved in* the interior cahinet, to curtail 
 the exercise of self-government hy the colonists, which they 
 had left their native land to enjoy, and to reduce them to mere 
 corporation privileges. A new system of governing America 
 was contemplated immediately after the peace, in which rais- 
 ing a revenue by internal taxation was the prominent feature ; 
 and this was in addition to that external taxation, which the 
 Americans already paid under the name of regulations of 
 trade, and to which they had pretty cheerfully submitted for 
 the benefit of the whole empire, as a contribution for their pri- 
 vate security and public safety ; and they adhered to it with 
 far less smuggling than is practised in the ports of Great 
 Britain. With this plan in view, it was at once foreseen, that 
 General Sir JefTery Amherst, the 61 eve of Pitt, was not the 
 man for their purpose. This Butean system (for so we think 
 we have reason to designate the suggestions of the irresponsible 
 cabinet, under which the ostensible administration of the obse- 
 quious Duke of Grafton acted) created a new office, a Secre- 
 taryship of State for the American Department, to which sta- 
 tion the Earl of Hillsborough was appointed ; and General 
 Amherst was dismissed from his government of Virginia with so 
 little ceremony, as to merit, according to Junius, the name of 
 insult, and Lord Botetourt appointed in his place. 
 
 Lord Hillsborough was' a man of few and .light talents in 
 the opinion of Junius, who, under the signature of Lucius, 
 says, that his Lordship is civil and polite ; that few men under- 
 stand the little morals better, or observe the great ones less ; 
 that he can bow and smile in an honest man's face, while he 
 picks his pocket. " These are the virtues of a court, in which 
 
 * We caution the young American reader not to mistake Granville 
 for Grenville. The former was originally Lord Carteret, very honor- 
 ably mentioned, if not flattered, by Dean Swift, in 1730.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD AMHERST. 347 
 
 your education," says Junius, " has not been neglected. In 
 any other school you might have learned, that simplicity and 
 integrity are worth them all. Sir Jeffery Amherst was fighting 
 the battles of his country, while you, my Lord, the darling 
 child of prudence and urbanity, were practising the generous 
 arts of a courtier, and securing an honorable interest, in the an- 
 te-chamber of a favorite. " As a man of abilities for pub- 
 lic business, your first experiment has been unfortunate. 
 Your circular letter to the American governors, both for 
 matter and composition, is a performance which a school- 
 boy ought to blush for." — " Instead of clear, precise instruc- 
 tions, adapted to the temper, circumstances, and interests of 
 the several provinces, wherein you might have shown your 
 political abilities as well as your knowledge of that country, — 
 what have you done ? " Yet the ministerial writers of that 
 day asserted, that Lord Hillsborough's great abilities were 
 brought into public office to correct the blunders of Pitt's 
 administration I 
 
 The answer of the Assembly of Massachusetts to Lord Hills- 
 borough's circular was written entirely by Samuel Adams. 
 Had we never seen the printed remarks of Junius on his 
 Lordship's Letter to the American Governors, we might have 
 been excused for pronouncing one as the production of a boy, 
 and the other that of an able, wise, and temperate man. This 
 reply to the new-formed Secretary of State for America, to- 
 gether with the circular addressed to the Sister Colonies from 
 the same pen, struck out a spark that set every Province in a 
 blaze of patriotism, and produced, as usual, effects directly 
 contrary to what were intended and predicted by the British 
 ministry. 
 
 As to Lord Botetourt, Junius describes him as a character 
 very different from that of Amherst, whom he supplanted. He 
 was one of the household troops, connected in office with the 
 palace, being sword-bearer to his Majesty ; previously to which 
 he had ruined himself by gambling and extravagance. If this
 
 348 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 be the true character of that nobleman, what a contrast to that 
 of Lord Amherst .* 
 
 Such a man and such an officer as General Amherst, pa- 
 tronized so particularly by Lord Chatham, would have been 
 the most proper person for a Governor-General of America, 
 according to the British notions of governing us. We discover 
 the political opinion of Junius from the following passage of his 
 Letter, addressed to the Printer of the Public Advertiser, 
 signed Atticus. " But I see the spirit which has gone abroad 
 through the colonies, and I know what consequences that spirit 
 must and will produce. If it be determined to enforce the au- 
 thority of the legislature, the event will be uncertain ; but if we 
 yield to the pretensions of America, there is no further doubt 
 about the matter. From that moment they become an inde- 
 pendent people ; they open their trade with the rest of the 
 world, and England is undone. 
 
 " In these circumstances, calamitous as they are, I yet think 
 the uniform direction of a great and able minister might do 
 much. His earliest care, I am persuaded, would be to pro- 
 vide a fund to support the first alarm and expense of a rup- 
 ture with France. If prepared to meet a war, he might per- 
 haps avoid it. His next object would be to form a plan of 
 agreement ivith the colonies. He would consent to yield some 
 ground to the Americans, if it were possible to receive a secu- 
 ■ rity from them, that they never would advance beyond a 
 
 LINE THEN DRAWN, UPON CONDITIONS MUTUALLY AGREED ON. 
 
 By an equitable offer of this kind, he would certainly unite this 
 country in the support of his measures ; and lam persuaded 
 he would have the reasonable part of the Americans on his 
 side."f 
 
 * General Amherst was created a Peer in May, 1776. He was 
 Commander in Chief of the armies of Great Britain several years, and 
 Lieutenant-General of the Ordnance ; was made a Field-Marshal in 
 July, 1796 ; and died at Montreal, his seat in Kent, August 3, 1797. 
 
 f Letter XLV. October 6, 1768, Atticus. Miscellaneous.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD AMHERST. 349 
 
 I would here ask if this is not the precise doctrine which was 
 maintained by Lord Chatham respecting America, and for 
 which he contended against the Duke of Richmond to the 
 last moment of his political existence ? 
 
 The doctrine is explicitly this ; Tax yourselves, govern your- 
 selves, wear an union flag ; and give us the preference in every- 
 thing, and rely oiv the protection of our invincible navy, and 
 never think of building one of your own. 
 
 " Henceforth let Whig and Tory cease, 
 And turn all party rage to peace ; 
 Rouse and revive our ancient glory, 
 Unite and drive the world before ye." 
 
 This was the feeling of the great body of Whigs on both 
 sides of the Atlantic. A few only saw farther. 
 
 It is worse than labor lost, to rely on certain books called 
 histories of England, — histories of the reign of George the 
 Third, from the year 1762 to the term when peace was con- 
 cluded with the United States. Each party exaggerates, or 
 extenuates, or else omits the real state of facts, or places a 
 real fact with its wrong end foremost, so as to appear what 
 it is not. During the time specified, most truth is to be 
 collected from anonymous writers. The Britons boast of 
 their freedom of speech and freedom of the press; but their 
 historians do not, half the time, speak what they know to 
 be true of courts and crowned heads. Whether this be 
 from fear of the law's steel trap, or merely the policy of the 
 trade, we are too far off to determine. But it is a fact, 
 that we have more exact and fearless • accounts in print of i 
 the character and conduct of French Kings, Queens, Prin- 
 cesses, and their Courts, than of the Kings, Queens, Princess- 
 es, and Courts of the British nation ; and far less backward- 
 ness in speaking of their follies and crimes. How comes this? 
 Have the Britons more delicacy and gallantry than the French, 
 or less liberty ? The personal character and conduct of George 
 the Third is less known and diffused throughout the island of 
 Great Britain than throughout America. We are at such a
 
 350 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 happy distance that we can take into view a larger landscape, 
 and contemplate it with perfect composure, without fear of of- 
 fending any body, as we do when judging of the history of an- 
 cient Greece and Rome. So we can judge of the means taken 
 to destroy the richest fruits of the Herculean labors of Lord 
 Chatham ; like the workings of the worm in the bottoms of 
 ships, operating destruction silently and fatally under the sur- 
 face. 
 
 However familiar in conversation, George the Third pre- 
 served remarkable state in some other matters. No court in 
 Europe had so many officers, so many footmen of high rank. 
 Think, republicans ! of noblemen, even aged Peers, waiting 
 upon a young monarch, standing behind his chair, serving at 
 his toilet, and dressing him ; and this degradation for money, 
 for titles, ribbons, stars, so called, and offices of no business ; 
 or, to express it all in one word, for Nobility ! * It is no 
 wonder that Junius was sarcastic, Chatham impatient, fretful, 
 and, at times, contemptuous, in his intercourse with the privi- 
 leged order, when sprigs of it were preferred before such char- 
 acters as General Amherst, whose ill treatment is discussed in 
 Letters, entitled Miscellaneous, between the Numbers XXX. 
 and XLIV. in the younger Woodfall's edition of Junius. 
 They express not merely indignation but resentment. They 
 hint that the manner of the affront was intended as a back-hand- 
 ed blow at Lord Chatham. Sir Jeffery Amherst, a soldier from 
 infancy, and a very popular general, had carried his own fame 
 and that of Pitt's through every town and village of Great 
 Britain, Ireland, and America, — countries where public opin- 
 ion bears on its strong wings every thing good or evil. 
 
 The Right Hon. Henry Bilson Legge had talents and char- 
 acter which made him a most valuable adjunct to Lord Chat- 
 ham. The baleful influence, of which that nobleman com- 
 plained, was exerted to pull this prop from under him. Hence 
 we conceive the indignation of Junius at his dismission, and 
 
 * See, on this head, Horace Walpole, and Lemuel Gulliver's Travels 
 in Lilliput.
 
 NOTICE OF LORD AMHERST. 351 
 
 the almost rage of the same writer at the attempt to pull away 
 the other substantial prop of Chatham's fame, — the popular 
 general. He says of it, " A government shameless or ill ad- 
 vised enough to treat with disregard the obligation due to pub- 
 lic services, not only sets a most pernicious example to its sub- 
 jects, but does a flagrant injury to society. Reflections, such 
 as these, crowded upon my mind the moment 1 heard that the 
 late commander-in-chief had been dismissed, without ceremo- 
 ny, from his government of Virginia. I was grieved to see 
 such a man so treated ; but when I considered this step as an 
 omen of the real resolution of the ministry with respect to 
 America, I forgot, as he himself will do, the "private injury, 
 and lamented nothing but the public misfortune." 
 
 Lord Chatham doubtless saw, in prospective, the course of 
 things in Old England and in New, and dreaded the conse- 
 quences ; dreaded a solution of continuity in the politics of the 
 mother country and her offspring. This was a period of anx- 
 ious solicitude with wise men on both sides of the Atlantic. The 
 celebrated Horace Walpole, writing to his kinsman, General 
 Conway, about that time, says, " The long expected sloop is 
 arrived at last, and is indeed a man of war ! The general 
 Congress have voted (1.) A non-importation. (2.) A non- 
 exportation. And (3.) A non-consumption. The Americans, 
 at least, have acted like men, gone to the bottom at once, and 
 set the whole upon the whole. Our conduct has been that of 
 pert children ; we have thrown a pebble at a mastiff; and are 
 surprised it was not frightened. Now we must be worried by 
 it, or must kill the guardian of the house, which will be plun- 
 dered the moment little master has nothing but the old nurse 
 to defend it." 
 
 It was well that General Amherst was not sent out Prefect to 
 this country, where Lord Botetourt met little else than mortifi- 
 cation. Matters had proceeded too far, for even the prudent 
 and popular Sir Jeffery Amherst to have managed with satis- 
 faction to himself and to America. Patrick Henry in the 
 South, and Samuel Adams in the JVort h, had fixed their steady
 
 352 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 eyes on Independency ; and nothing short of it could pacify 
 those political seers and the few, who, at that early period, felt 
 like them upon the great question of self-government. Not 
 long after the period to which I refer, their sentiments became 
 general ; when every thing about us, even the face and course 
 of nature, the still small voice of religion, — all, — all were con- 
 strued into so many calls, more or less loud, for a separation 
 of vast America from the small island of Britain. 
 
 While w T ar and vengeance were denounced by the ministry 
 against the rebellious people of Massachusetts, the Governor 
 of Virginia was instructed to use the gentlest promises of kind 
 relief and satisfaction towards the Southern Colonists. Ac- 
 cordingly, Lord Botetourt says to the Assembly of Virginia, 
 in May, 1769, " I think myself peculiarly fortunate to be able 
 to inform you, by a letter from the Earl of Hillsborough, that 
 his Majesty's present administration have at no time entertained 
 a design to propose to Parliament to lay any further taxes 
 upon America for the purpose of raising a revenue, and that 
 it is their intention to propose, in the next session of Parlia- 
 ment to take off the duties upon glass, paper, and colors, upon 
 consideration of such duties having been paid contrary to the 
 true principles of commerce." 
 
 In answer to the speech of the royal Governor to the House 
 of Burgesses, they say to him, " We have examined it [the 
 conciliatory proposition] minutely ; we have viewed it in every 
 point of light in which we are able to place it, and with pain 
 and disappointment we must ultimately declare, it only changes 
 the form of oppression without lightening the burden." And, 
 after saying that " Lord Chatham's bill on the one hand, and 
 the terms of the Congress on the other, would have formed a 
 basij for negotiation, which a spirit of accommodation, on both 
 sides, might perhaps have reconciled," they close with these 
 impressive words. " We have decently remonstrated with Par- 
 liament ; they have added new injuries to the old. We have 
 wearied our King with supplications ; he has not deigned to 
 answer us. We have appealed to the native honor and justice
 
 CONSPIRATION OF THE COLONIES. 353 
 
 of the British nation ; their efforts in our favor have been 
 hitherto ineffectual. What then is to be done ? That we com- 
 mit ourselves to the even-handed justice of that Being who 
 doeth no wrong ; earnestly beseeching Him to illuminate the 
 councils, and prosper the endeavours of those to whom Ameri- 
 ca hath confided her hopes, that, through their wise direction, 
 we may again see re-united the blessings of liberty and proper- 
 ty, and the most permanent harmony with Great-Britain." 
 After expressing loyalty to the King and amity to the mother 
 country, they adjourned. But four days after, they, in imita- 
 tion of the Assembly of Massachusetts when they constituted 
 their Provincial Congress, formed themselves into a Conven- 
 tion of Delegates to supply the place of the House of Bur- 
 gesses, and went on in their legislative duties in the same form 
 and order, making their parliamentary business a continuation, 
 rather than a revolution of government. 
 
 Maryland, Virginia's offspring, followed her example ; and 
 amongst other spirited resolves, their convention voted unani- 
 mously, that " We do unite as one band, and solemnly pledge 
 ourselves to each other and to America, that we will, to the 
 utmost of our power, support the present opposition carrying 
 on, as well by arms as the continental association restraining 
 our commerce." They moreover voted to enroll forty com- 
 panies of " minute-men" of every effective freeman between 
 sixteen and fifty, practising physicians and those persons who, 
 from their religious principles, cannot bear arms in any case, 
 excepted." Thus was war lit up at both ends of the United 
 Colonies, which neither Chatham nor Amherst could have 
 averted, so long as the wretched policy of Britain was that of 
 playing one colony against the other, on the imbecile maxim of 
 Divide and conquer. 
 
 45
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF JUNIUs's LETTERS. 
 
 In the foregoing chapter we have inserted notices or sketch- 
 es of those distinguished persons who appear prominent in the 
 volumes of Junius, omitting Sir William Draper, as a mere 
 military character, incidentally brought before the public, and 
 little connected with the design of this inquiry. Those per- 
 sonages were Lord Camden, Lord Mansfield, Henry Fox, 
 Lord Holland, the Duke of Bedford, Duke of Grafton, and 
 General. Lord Amherst. 
 
 We have overcome our reluctance to multiply pages, from 
 a persuasion that we are bound to show, on our hypothe- 
 sis, how Lord Chatham came to feel affinity, or affiliation, with 
 Lord Camden ; and how, also, repulsion as it regarded Lord 
 Chief Justice Mansfield ; and that the same affinity and repul- 
 sion pervade likewise the pages of Junius. We deemed it of 
 some importance to dwell a little upon the mixed feelings of 
 Lord Chatham and of Junius towards Lord Holland, a man 
 of heterogenous composition, superinduced on a firm and hon- 
 orable character. It was impossible to skip over the antipathy 
 between Junius and the Duke of Bedford, Lord Bute's repre- 
 sentative in arranging the articles of the peace at the court 
 of Versailles ; he who tried to demolish the triumphal arch 
 which Fame had erected, out of French materials, to the 
 honor of Pitt, Earl of Chatham. 
 
 Not having, at first view, a clear sight of the cause which 
 produced the remarkable vituperation of Junius towards the 
 Duke of Grafton, we were compelled to bestow more time and 
 attention upon that political camelion, than the subject was 
 really worth, unless it were to confirm the notion, prevalent in 
 this country, that George the Third was in reality his own min- 
 ister from 1762 to the peace with these United States
 
 RESPECT IN AMERICA FOR PITT AND AMHERST. 355 
 
 We dwell with more interest on the article respecting Gene- 
 ral Amherst, as a link in the chain of our own history, and as 
 exhibiting instances of abounding cunning and deficient wis- 
 dom in the efforts of the crown to force America to submit to 
 her arbitrary system of internal taxation. I say internal, in 
 contradistinction to the external contribution, connected with 
 that superintendence which regulates and controls trade and 
 navigation ; the one being private, individual, and sacred ; the 
 other extended, and of complicated consideration, reaching as 
 far as ships can sail or winds can blow. The majority of Par- 
 liament, without confining the remark to the country gentle- 
 men, never appeared to us to understand this vital distinction. 
 
 Americans experience a pleasant consociation of ideas, when- 
 ever the names of Sir Jeffery Amherst and William Pitt * are 
 mentioned. They recall to mind a happy period in our colo- 
 nial history, as it regards those eminent characters, and bring 
 up the pleasant idea of confidential friendship, entwining the 
 palm of the soldier with the laurel of the statesman. 
 
 That Junius should write a dozen Letters, under various 
 signatures, expressive of his disgust at the treatment of General 
 Amherst, and that the British public generally knew that treat- 
 ment was a backhanded stroke at Lord Chatham, are facts of no 
 small importance in establishing our idea of the authorship of 
 Junius. That disinterested nobleman bore the abuse in sullen 
 silence as it regarded individuals ; but he denounced, in the 
 
 * We recollect seventeen towns in the United States, named in 
 honor of Pitt. One built on the site of old Fort Pitt, at the confluence 
 of the Alleghany and Monongahela, forming the Ohio ; now the Bir- 
 mingham of America, in which are a national arsenal and very exten- 
 sive armory. This flourishing town is called Pittsburg. Another of 
 the same name in the county of Chatham, North Carolina. In New 
 Hampshire and Massachusetts, several called Pittsjield, Pittston, Pitts- 
 ville. Pitisford, &c. In New Hampshire is a flourishing town called 
 Amherst ; in Massachusetts another with a college, called after the 
 General ; one or more in the State of New York, and two in Virginia, 
 besides certain mineral springs, bearing the name of Amherst. These 
 are tokens of regard and gratitude, more lasting than statues, and 
 more in character than graven images.
 
 356 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 strongest terms, the political conduct of his enemies. " Were 
 I disposed," said he in the House of Lords, wherr he offered 
 his bill for conciliation with America, " to pursue this theme 
 to the extent that truth would bear me out in, I could demon- 
 strate, that the whole of your political conduct has been one 
 continued series of weakness, temerity, despotism, incapacity, 
 and corruption. On reconsideration, I must allow you one 
 merit, a strict attention to your interests ; in that view you ap- 
 pear sound statesmen and able politicians. You well knew, if 
 the present measure should prevail, that you must instantly re- 
 linquish your places. I doubt much whether you will be able 
 to keep them on any terms ; but sure I am, such are your well 
 known characters and abilities, that any plan of reconciliation, 
 however moderate, wise, and feasible, must fail in your hands. 
 Such, then, being your precarious situations, who would won- 
 der that you can put a negative on any measure which must an- 
 nihilate your power, deprive you of your emoluments, and at 
 once reduce you to that state of insignificance, for which God 
 and nature designed you ? " * 
 
 Lord Chatham gave himself a respite from all kinds of busi- 
 ness in the year 1769. He attended Parliament in 1770 ; 
 but not in 1771, 1772, and 1773 ; but in the year 1774 the 
 affairs of America brought him forward again. In May, 1777, 
 he re-appeared, and made one more effort to conciliate the per- 
 turbed spirits on both sides of the Atlantic, when he said, 
 
 " My Lords, — This is a flying moment ; perhaps but six 
 weeks left to arrest the dangers that surround us. The gath- 
 ering storm may break ; it has already opened, and in part 
 burst. It is difficult for government, after all that has passed, 
 to shake hands with defiers of the King, defiers of the Parlia- 
 ment, defiers of the people. I am a defier of nobody ; but if 
 an end is not put to this war, there is an end of this country. 
 
 * This tremendous philippic against the whole administration was 
 chiefly directed to Lord Sandwich, who insisted that any concession to 
 America was an abandonment of the cause of government, in which 
 he was followed by the Duke of Grafton and Lord Hillsborough.
 
 CHATHAM'S ATTEMPTS AT CONCILIATION. 357 
 
 I do not trust my judgment in my present state of health ; this 
 is the judgment of my better days ; the result of forty years' 
 attention to America. They are rebels ; but what are they 
 rebels for ? Surely not for defending their unquestionable 
 rights ! What have these rebels done heretofore ? I remem- 
 ber when they raised four regiments on their own bottom, and 
 took Louisburg from the veteran troops of France.* But 
 their excesses have been great. I do not mean to be their 
 panegyrist ; but must observe, in extenuation, the erroneous 
 and infatuated councils which have prevailed ; — the door to 
 mercy and to justice has been shut against them. But they 
 may still be taken up upon the grounds of their former sub- 
 mission. [Referring to their petition.] I state to you the im- 
 portance of America ; it is a double market ; the market of 
 consumption and the market of supply. This double market 
 for millions with naval stores, you are giving to your hereditary 
 rival. 
 
 " America has carried you through former wars, and will 
 carry you to your death if you don't take things in time. You 
 have ransacked every corner of Lower Saxony ; but forty 
 thousand German boors never can conquer ten times the num- 
 ber of British freemen ; they may ravage ; they cannot con- 
 quer. But you will conquer, you say ! Why, what would 
 you conquer ? The map of America. I am ready to meet 
 any general officer on the subject (looking at Lord Amherst.) 
 What will you do out of the protection of your fleet ? In the 
 winter, if together, they are starved ; and if dispersed, they 
 are taken off in detail. I am experienced in spring hopes and 
 vernal promises ; I know what ministers throw out ; but at 
 last will come your equinoctial disappointment. [When Lord 
 Chatham uttered this ominous speech, Burgoyne's army was 
 embarking for America. I remember that new maps of its route, 
 just from the press, were as plenty in London, in the hands of 
 
 * The British historians generally pass over in silence this fact so 
 honorable to America, particularly to New England, and more par- 
 ticularly to Boston.
 
 358 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 American refugees, as pamphlets. They talked of little else 
 than driving all before them triumphantly from the Lakes to 
 Boston. But, ere the equinoctial season was passed, that well- 
 appointed army laid down their arms at Saratoga, and surren- 
 dered to the American yeomanry !] 
 
 " If ministers are founded," continues Lord Chatham, " in 
 saying there is no sort of treaty with France, there is still a 
 moment left ; the point of honor is still safe. France must be 
 as self-destroying as England, to make a treaty while you are 
 giving her America at the expense of twelve millions a year. 
 The intercourse has produced every thing to France ; and 
 England, old England, must pay for all. I have, at different 
 times, made different propositions, adapted to the circum- 
 stances in which they were offered. The plan contained in 
 the former bill is now impracticable ; the present motion will 
 tell you where you are, and what you have now to depend 
 upon." 
 
 His motion for conciliation was negatived by a very large 
 majority. 
 
 Our first intention was to bring to probate the last will 
 and testament of Junius only, as witnessed by his printer, 
 Henry Sampson Woodfall, being those Letters prepared by 
 himself for the press. But we must now include a few others, 
 recognised by him in his private correspondence with Mr. 
 Woodfall, — some without signature and some with, — as Atii- 
 cus, Valerius, Lucius, Brutus, Domitian, Anti-Fox, — all bear- 
 ing indubitable marks of the same pen ; while we reject others 
 as too mean in phraseology and epithet to spring from the same 
 tasteful author. Junius saying to his printer, " You know I 
 do not, nor have I time to give an equal care to them all," is 
 not a sufficient excuse for the coarseness and leanness of some 
 of the essays scraped together under the head of Miscellaneous 
 Letters. When Junius predicted that posterity would read 
 his writings, he could not have meant, that every scrap and ex- 
 crescence of ill humor, unwisely exhibited to the eye on paper 
 when he was out of conceit with himself and with the city poli-
 
 HIS ZEAL FOR CONCILIATION. 359 
 
 ticians, instead of being immediately buried, should be left ex- 
 posed above ground. It is a pity that a scavenger had not 
 followed Dean Swift's remains, before editors and printers 
 scrambled for his exuvice ; and so of some later writers. 
 
 The power of Junius in maintaining his invisibility, in spite 
 of the most prying curiosity when winged with vengeance, bor- 
 ders on the wonderful, considering that Britain had a King at 
 that time remarkable for inquisitivcness, and for paying " rather 
 too much attention to the sins of his neighbours," * while he 
 had a double cabinet, over which presided curiosity personi- 
 fied. Yet all combined was, it seems, unable to detect that 
 political Sagittarius, who, fed with lion's marrow, instruct- 
 ed Hercules how to rid the world of its plagues. Still he 
 maintained his sway ; none so high but was reached by his 
 arrows, nor so low as to escape his tomahawk ; and yet he re- 
 mained, like the ancient Hercules, visible only by the effects of 
 his labors. Yet our modern Hero differed from the heathen, 
 seeing he aimed not always to pierce the vitals, but to heal 
 and restore. Hence this salutiferous reformer fingered every 
 sore, probed deep every ulcer through all its sinuosities, and 
 exposed to view each livid spot of mortification in the body 
 politic, without appearing affected by the contortions, wry faces, 
 or agony of the patient. It is neither just nor generous to con- 
 sider Junius, as many do, a malignant, supernal archer, shoot- 
 ing barbed arrows from impenetrable coverts, more like the 
 demon of destruction than a skilful political chirurgeon, whose 
 object was to save by " infusing a portion of new health into 
 the constitution to enable it to bear its infirmities," or to restore 
 it to its pristine vigor, as at the revolution in 1688. 
 
 To rouse up an indolent and sickly people to a sense of 
 their condition, and to induce them to make use of proffered 
 remedies, required the wisdom of a sage and the nice hand of a 
 master. In some countries and periods of the world, before 
 printing gave wings to literature, Prophets and Apostles were 
 
 * Earl Waldegrave, Governor to George the Third, when Prince of 
 
 Wales.
 
 3G0 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 sent to reclaim backsliding kings and a perverse people. But 
 the denunciations of the one, and the exhortations of the other, 
 were confined to narrow bounds, circumscribed to little more 
 than the compass of the human voice ; whereas now the Press, 
 under the guardianship of Liberty, writes the fearful denuncia- 
 tions on the interior of palaces and castles, and its triumph has 
 never been so great as when that most potent engine was worked 
 by the hand of an invisible agent. The histories of honorable 
 deceptions, called stratagems of war, from Hannibal to Wash- 
 ington, from Washington to Napoleon, prove, that they depend- 
 ed altogether on the superior genius of the commander. Infi- 
 nite as the means of deception are, in holding up one thing while 
 intending another, the object is security and efficacy. Strata- 
 gems in war are for an hour, a day, and rarely for months ; 
 but Junius attacked the highest and most powerful characters 
 in the realm, the sacred institutions of the law, and the law- 
 makers, under a mask, and within the circle of a single city, 
 during the long space of three years, when none, nor all, could 
 strip him of his visor, nor even trace the footsteps of the letter- 
 carrier from the writer's dwelling to the printer's, and from the 
 printer back again to the study of the writer. My surprise in- 
 creases at every review of this subject. We have nothing like 
 it in history. The reverend Doctor Gauden deceived the 
 British public in his Icon Basilike, by telling an absolute false- 
 hood ; yet Charles the Second rewarded him with a mitre, for 
 imposing on the world the counterfeit lucubrations of his own 
 brain for the pious effusions of his unhappy father. 
 
 Besides the composition, I have ever considered the tran- 
 scription and transmission of the Letters, for three years, with- 
 out detection, to be the most mysterious and puzzling circum- 
 stances in the history of the ghost of Junius Brutus. None 
 but a man of the first-rate powers and first-rate means could 
 have carried his design, as Junius did, into complete effect. 
 
 We have fixed the authorship of the Letters on the Earl of 
 Chatham, and have rendered it highly probable by the paral- 
 lel passages from his speeches, laid side by side with corre-
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 361 
 
 sponding passages from the Letters. We have shown the mu- 
 tual attachment between Chatham and Camden, as well as be- 
 tween Junius and this nobleman, by recording the unmingled 
 approbation of him by both. We have recalled to the reader's 
 mind the consimilarity of sentiment, expressed by Junius and by 
 Lord Chatham, as to the great learning and extraordinary abili- 
 ties of Lord Mansfield ; and we have pointed out the same de- 
 gree of repulsion in both. We have declared, that no public 
 character had such strong reasons for indignation and resent- 
 ment towards the Duke of Bedford as had Lord Chatham ; 
 for when the Duke signed the articles of the peace, he put a 
 match to the combustibles, that had been three years collecting 
 around the monument which Fame had erected to Pitt's glory. 
 We have exposed the chief reasons of the contempt of Ju- 
 nius for that sham minister, the Duke of Grafton, but we 
 do not believe he was so had, or so weak a man, as he is 
 represented by that violent writer. 
 
 We ask the reader's attention to the anecdotes of General 
 Lord Amherst * and request him to call to mind the history of 
 the wars and conquests in America from 1758 to 1761, and 
 the narrative of the dismission of Sir Jeffery Amherst from 
 his government of Virginia, together with the creation of a 
 third Secretary of Slate, specially made for the subjugation 
 of America. Does not this concatenation of facts corrobo- 
 rate, if not substantiate our idea, and identify Junius with 
 Chatham ? 
 
 Let us return to our rallying point, and see if our great 
 Statesman had qualities and faculties needful for such a delicate 
 task as writing audacious and terrific truths on the interior 
 walls of palaces. The North Briton says of him, " The 
 sight of Pitt's mind was infinite. His schemes were to af- 
 fect, not England, not the present age only, but Europe 
 and posterity. Wonderful were the means by which those 
 
 * The present Earl, son of the General, is named William Pitt Am- 
 herst 
 
 46
 
 362 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 schemes were accomplished ; — always seasonable and always 
 adequate." * 
 
 He had been, from early life, a very active member of the 
 House of Commons, Paymaster-general, and Secretary of 
 State. When Prime Minister he retained the Secretaryship, 
 and, what was very extraordinary indeed, he was in effect, and 
 to all purposes, the Board of Admiralty within himself; having 
 stipulated with George the Second, that he should engross the 
 correspondence with the officers of the fleet abroad and at 
 home, which heretofore appertained to the board at large, and 
 that his orders and instructions should be signed by the Lords 
 of the Admiralty without their knowing what they signed. 
 Napoleon himself had hardly more unfettered power. Hence 
 it was, that promptness, nay, rapidity, marked all his measures. 
 Quick and fiery in his temper, he was yet patient when he di- 
 rected his mind to investigation ; and then he adopted the 
 calm and deliberate steps of the mathematician in search 
 of truth, which, when found, he proclaimed in the thun- 
 ders of oratory, and dazzling flashes of elocution. Thus he 
 stood before the collective nation an object of the highest re- 
 spect, and of dread to its enemies. It is to this extraordinary 
 man we attribute the authorship of the Letters of Junius, — a 
 man, of whom Earl Waldegrave (who did not love him) says, 
 " He has the finest genius, improved by study, and all the 
 ornamental part of classical learning. He has a peculiar clear- 
 ness and facility of expression ; and has an eye as significant 
 as his words. He is not always a fair or conclusive reasoner, 
 but commands the passions with sovereign authority ; and to 
 inflame or captivate a popular assembly is a consummate ora- 
 tor. He has courage of every sort, cool or impetuous, active 
 or deliberate. At present he is the guide and champion of the 
 people. He is imperious, violent, and implacable ; impatient 
 even of the slightest contradiction ; and, under the mask of 
 patriotism, has the despotic spirit of a tyrant. 
 
 * The JVorth Briton was written in Numbers, like the Spectator, by 
 various hands.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 363 
 
 " However, though his political sins are black and dangerous, 
 his private character is irreproachable ; he is incapable of a 
 treacherous or ungenerous action ; and in the common offices 
 of life is justly esteemed a man of veracity and a man of honor. 
 
 " He mixes little in company, confining his society to a 
 small juncto of his relations, with a few obsequious friends, who 
 consult him as an oracle, admire his superior understanding, 
 and never presume to have an opinion of their own.* 
 
 " This separation from the world is not entirely owing to 
 pride, or an unsociable temper ; as it proceeds partly from bad 
 health and a weak constitution. But he may find it an im- 
 passable barrier in the road of ambition ; for though the mob 
 can sometimes raise a minister, he must be supported by per- 
 sons of higher rank, who may be mean enough in some par- 
 ticulars, yet will not be the patient followers of any man who 
 despises their homage and avoids their solicitations. Besides, 
 it is a common observation, that men of plain sense and cool 
 resolution have more useful talents, and are better qualified for 
 public business, than the man of the finest parts, who wants 
 temper, judgment, and the knowledge of mankind. Even par- 
 liamentary abilities may be too highly rated ; for between the 
 man of eloquence and the sagacious statesman there is a wide 
 interval." 
 
 We set a high value on this character of Mr. Pitt writ- 
 ten by a contemporary, no less eminent than Earl Walde- 
 grave, whose grandmother was daughter of James the Second; 
 an accomplished scholar and philosopher ; and selected by 
 George the Second to be governor of his grandson, afterwards 
 George the Third. He was averse to the post, and said to 
 the aged monarch, " Sire, I am too young to govern, and too 
 old to be governed." But he was constrained to submit ; and 
 found, as he feared, that he could not acquire the confidence 
 of his pupil or of his pupiVs mother. 
 
 * Except his sister, Mrs. Annt Pitt.
 
 364 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 Notwithstanding the slight exceptions scattered here and 
 there in the character of Mr. Pitt, Lord Waldegrave adds what 
 would seem to sweep them all away. " From a cornet of horse, 
 then his only subsistence, in less than twenty years he has 
 raised himself to be first minister, and the most powerful sub- 
 ject in this country.'''' " The masterly characteristics by Lord 
 Waldegrave were manifestly intended," says his biographer, 
 " for posterity ; " and his admirable Memoirs look like it.* 
 
 Such a man was Lord Chatham in the opinion of friends 
 and foes. Yet ambidextrous as he was, he could never have 
 written, and prepared for the press, the Letters in question, 
 without the aid and assistance of some eye, brain, and hand, 
 beside his own. It is impossible he could have effected the 
 task alone. Help he must have had ; confidence he must 
 have secured. But of what sort? The help could not have 
 been derived from hired people ; from any pensioned scribe, 
 who might ever be detached from his employer by disgust, 
 harsh treatment, or neglect. I cannot admit for a moment, 
 that his amanuensis could be bound to absolute secrecy, and 
 such a secret too, by any chain, either iron or gold. That is 
 but pseudo-confidence which can be bought ; for whatever can 
 be bought may be sold. Burke's amanuensis betrayed him. 
 Junius's never. His must have been that safe and faithful 
 scribe to be found only in a faithful bosom friend, — that pearl 
 of great price, so rare and so valuable. The mere surmise 
 will lead us to a nearer view of the personage so often men- 
 tioned. Starting with this potulatum of a bosom friend, with 
 caution and diffidence we approach the subject ; yet not with- 
 out a hope and firm belief, that we shall catch a glimpse of 
 that great and substantial blessing. 
 
 * Earl Waldegrave died of small-pox in March, 1763. Without the 
 polish or servile manners of a court, this nobleman was greatly esteem- 
 ed for his probity, benevolence, and literary acquirements. The Duke 
 of Cumberland, son of George the Second, said, that, to his knowledge, 
 death itself would have been more welcome to Lord Waldegrave, than 
 any union with Lord Bute or Mr. Fox. He rejected all offers of em- 
 ployment under the young King.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 365 
 
 The indispensably requisite amanuensis, in the delicate busi- 
 ness before us, — the partner in the vital secret, could have been 
 none else than another self; and may, if rightly considered, veri- 
 fy the assertion of Junius, when he said, " / am the sole de- 
 pository of my own secret." Indeed it is clear, that he meant it 
 should be understood in a qualified sense, from what immedi- 
 ately precedes it, viz. " If I am a vain man, my gratification 
 lies within a narrow circle." The term itself has here a plu- 
 ral meaning, intimating, what could not be otherwise, that there 
 were some ones to whom the secret was known. This idea 
 is confirmed by a trifling anecdote. An idle letter (to Ju- 
 nta), written in a spirt of levity, according not altogether 
 with the serious and dignified character of Junius, he wished 
 therefore to obliterate ; and he writes to Mr. Wood fall, " It 
 was written against my own opinion. The truth is, there are 
 people about me, whom I wish not to contradict, and who woxdd 
 rather see Junius in the papers, ever so improperly, than not 
 at all." 
 
 The important question is, who was the faithful bosom 
 friend, or the confidential friends, forming that narrow circled 
 Throughout this goodly and wondrous frame of nature, of 
 which we ourselves make a part, every generating thing is sent 
 forth in pairs. No one thing stands alone. There is indeed 
 unity, but oneness has no existence this side the eternal world. 
 I leave to the feeling and sagacity of each reader, whether the 
 first impression on his or her mind, was not that the persons about 
 Junius, whom he wished not to contradict, were Women ; as- 
 suming, as we do, that Chatham was the man. Name or 
 imagine the mortal man, if you can, whom William Pitt would 
 hesitate to contradict, if he urged any thing against his opin- 
 ion. Inflexible in his own will, and stubborn as a rock with 
 men, that nobleman was, from all accounts, a pliant domestic 
 man. But who could bend the Statesman ? We shall relate 
 what we have learned concerning him, without lisping a word 
 of impartiality or partiality, or claiming an exemption from pre- 
 judice, which no reader of common sense would believe, seeing 
 every hypothesis is stuck pretty full of both.
 
 366 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 We have said that Mr. Pitt married the sister of Richard 
 Grenville, Earl Temple. She is spoken of as a lady of 
 exemplary goodness and cultivated talents. We judge of her 
 by what has flowed from her own pen, and from circumstan- 
 tials. The editor of the Life of the Right Hon. William Pitt, 
 Earl of Chatham, published by Almon, addressed a letter to 
 her as the Dowager Countess of Chatham, in 1791, when she 
 was far advanced in life, and accompanied it with the volumes. 
 She says in answer, " I cannot delay desiring you to accept 
 of my sincere thanks for this mark of your attention. The 
 sentiments expressed by you of the abilities and virtues of my 
 late dear Lord, are a sort of assurance to me, that I shall find 
 his character and conduct painted in those colors that suit the 
 dignity and wisdom that belonged to them." In the same let- 
 ter she utters her deep regret at the loss experienced by her- 
 self, her country, her family, and friends. If this should be 
 considered as the formal expression of a bereaved widow, mere 
 common-place language, we have a small family-picture by her 
 own hand, clear from any thing of the kind. It is a letter to 
 Dr. Addington, their family-physician and particular friend, 
 and has special reference to an anecdote which excited great 
 public attention in that day (1778.) It related to an overture, 
 said to have been made from the Earl of Bute to the Earl of 
 Chatham, by the agency of Sir James Wright, and through Dr. 
 Addington* who was the family-physician to all three, and 
 whose mind and time were much given to politics. The 
 negotiation, if a loose, informal, out-of-joint conversation could 
 merit that name, had for its ultimate object the return of Lord 
 Chatham, then in a miserable state of health, to the service of 
 his country as Prime Minister, to remedy, if possible, the 
 lamentable condition of the kingdom, the efforts of which were 
 unavailing, and its arms unsuccessful, in every quarter of the 
 globe. Among other heart-sinking calamities was the disaster 
 of General Burgoyne's army, who, after very hard fighting and 
 
 * Father of tbe Prime Minister of that name.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 367 
 
 repeated defeats, were compelled to lay down their arms and 
 surrender to the American militia. Upon this followed the 
 treaty of alliance, offensive and defensive, with France, and 
 our increasing current of success in all our Southern States ; 
 which finally led to the capture of a second British army un- 
 der the command of Earl Cornwallis, and that strong flood 
 of feeling which followed after these events in England and 
 in America. 
 
 In this deplorable situation of affairs, as it regarded Britain, 
 it was a prevalent opinion, that none hut Lord Chatham could 
 save the kingdom from utter ruin. Whatever mortification may 
 pretend, there was something like a negotiation contemplated, 
 and more than contemplated.* The sick Lord Chatham, dis- 
 gusted with a half-way, gossipping piece of business, tried to put 
 an end to it by the following note to Dr. Addington. 
 
 " Hayes, February 1th, [1778.] 
 " The conversations, which a certain gentleman [Sir James 
 Wright] has found means to have with you, are, on his part, 
 of a nature too insidious, and to my feelings too offensive, to 
 be continued, or unrejected. What can this officious emissary 
 mean by all the nonsense he has, at times, thrown out to you ? 
 The next attempt he makes to surprise friendly integrity by 
 courtly insinuation, let him know that his great patron [Lord 
 Bute] and your village friend differ in this ; — one has brought 
 the King and Kingdom to ruin ; the other would sincerely 
 endeavour to save it." 
 
 This note was followed by a letter from Sir James Wright 
 to Dr. Addington, in such high strains of respect and defer- 
 ence for Lord Chatham, as seems to have disarmed the noble 
 sufferer of anger ; as appears by the following letter from 
 Lady Chatham to Dr. Addington. This is the small family- 
 
 * The author was, at that period and two years previous, a member 
 of Dr. Fothergill's family.
 
 368 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 picture ; and all that we have here said of Lord Bute, Dr. Ad- 
 dington, and Sir James Wright, is hut the frame of it. 
 
 From Lady Chatham to Dr. Addington. 
 
 "I write, my dear Sir, from my Lord's bed-side, who has 
 had much pain all last night from gout in his left hand and 
 wrist. The pulse indicates more pain to come. 
 
 " He desires me to express for him the true sense he has of 
 all your very friendly attentions in this very delicate and criti- 
 cal situation. 
 
 " The gentleman's letter, which you transmit, is handsomely 
 written, and sufficiently explicit. At the same time it is im- 
 possible not to remark, how widely it differs from the tenor of 
 some of the intimations conveyed in former strange conversa- 
 tions to you. The letter now before him is written also with 
 much good sense and candor, as coming from a heart touched 
 with the extreme dangers impending over the King and King- 
 dom. Those dangers are indeed extreme, and seem to pre- 
 clude all hope. 
 
 " Hayes, quarter before one, February 9th, 1778." * 
 
 As it is to our purpose to speak of this noble Lady, let us, 
 with respectful steps, approach the dwelling of the supposed 
 author of the famous Letters. This hallowed retreat is situ- 
 ated in the pleasant village of Hayes, sixteen miles from Lon- 
 don, where shone, in dignified retirement, the partner of the 
 great Statesman's honors, cares, and pains. f Ol this excellent 
 woman the Rev. F. Thackeray says, " She possessed a very 
 powerful understanding, combined with great feminine deli- 
 cacy. The ease and spirit with which her Ladyship wrote, 
 rendered her letters very delightful to her friends, and enabled 
 her to assist Lord Chatham, during his attendance in Parlia- 
 
 * Lord Chatham died three months after. 
 
 f From a private letter to Woodfall, March 5, 1772, we infer, that 
 Junius resided in the country.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 269 
 
 merit, or his attacks of the gout, in answering many of his cor- 
 respondents." 
 
 Such domestic aids in the most secret and delicate tran- 
 sactions of a minister's life, are less rare in Europe than here, 
 where, as yet, our government has few or no secrets ; and 
 diplomacy itself but little occasion for exercising those subtle 
 powers of intrigue, stratagem, and honorable artifice, com- 
 mon in most countries. 
 
 We have a delightful picture of the amiable influence of the 
 female character on the life and conduct of a public man, 
 brought down to us through Roman history. It has been ju- 
 diciously re-touched by the Spectator (See No. 525.), and 
 relates to Pliny, who is there described as one of the finest 
 gentlemen and politest writers of the age in which he lived. 
 It is contained in a letter to Hispulla, his wife's aunt, who 
 brought her up. Pliny, speaking of his wife, says, " I am 
 sure it will be a pleasure to you to hear that she proves wor- 
 thy of her father, worthy of you, and of your and her ances- 
 tors. Her ingenuity is admirable ; her frugality extraordinary. 
 She loves me, the surest pledge of her virtue ; and adds to 
 this a wonderful disposition to learning, which she has acquired 
 from her affection to me. She reads my writings, studies 
 them, and even gets them by heart. You'd smile to see 
 the concern she is in when I have a cause to plead ; and the 
 joy she shows when it is over. She finds means to have the 
 first news brought her of the success I meet with in court, — 
 how I am heard, and what decree is made. If I recite any 
 thing in public, she cannot refrain from placing herself pri- 
 vately in some corner to hear, where, with the utmost delight, 
 she feasts upon my applause. Sometimes she sings my verses, 
 and accompanies them with the lute, without any master, ex- 
 cept love, the best of instructers. From these instances, I 
 take the most certain omens of our perpetual and increasing 
 happiness, since her affection is not founded on my youth and 
 person, which must gradually decay ; but she is in Jove with 
 the immortal part of ine, — my glory and reputation. Nor in- 
 
 47
 
 370 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 deed could less be expected from one who had the happiness 
 to receive her education from you. who, in your house, was 
 accustomed to every thing that was virtuous and decent, and 
 even began to love me by your recommendation. For, as you 
 had always the greatest respect for my mother, you were 
 pleased, from my infancy, to form me, to commend me, and 
 kindly to presage I should be one day what my wife fancies I 
 am. Accept, therefore, our united thanks ; mine, that you 
 have bestowed her on me ; and hers, that you have given me 
 to her, as a mutual grant of joy and felicity." 
 
 Here is a beautiful family-picture, painted about eighty 
 years after the birth of Christ, by a contemporary of Tacitus, 
 a subject of Trajan, and a particular pupil of Quintilian, — the 
 all accomplished Pliny ; and it may be justly admired as a 
 faithful delineation of friendship, tenderness, true love, and 
 constancy. 
 
 What forbids our tranferring this charming domestic scene 
 to the quiet habitation of Lord and Lady Chatham at Hayes ? 
 and with felicitous circumstantials, which neither Roman nor 
 Grecian ever enjoyed ? 
 
 Lord Chatham, besides an accomplished spouse, was blessed 
 with a sister, Mrs. Anne Pitt* who is represented by Mr. 
 Burke as a lady of extraordinary powers of mind, a very keen 
 disputant even with her brother, and remarkable for richness 
 and variety of eloquence in discourse, resembling that for which 
 he was famous, and to a degree even to astonish the modern 
 Cicero, who expressed his regret that he had not committed 
 to paper some striking specimens of her brilliancy. f Com- 
 mon as exaggeration is in giving characters, we have no sus- 
 picion of it here, seeing the celebrated Lord Bolingbroke was 
 equally enraptured with the mental powers of Anne Pitt. His 
 
 * Mrs. Anne Pitl died unmarried, in 1789. In England they call 
 single women, of an advanced age, Mrs., and not Miss, as we do in 
 America. We apply that girlish epithet to a maiden lady of ninety or 
 a hundred. 
 
 f See ? ! f Burke.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 37 1 
 
 Lordship had the highest opinion of the genius of Mr. Pitt 
 as a man, and of his sister as a woman. The former he termed 
 sublimity Pitt, and the latter divinity Pitt. Horace Walpole 
 says, in a letter to the Earl of Hertford in April, 1765, " Mr. 
 Caraman is agreeable, informed, and intelligent. He supped 
 at your brother's t'other night, after being at Mrs. Anne Pitt's. 
 As the first curiosity of foreigners is to see Mr. Pitt, and as 
 that curiosity is one of the most difficult points in the world 
 to gratify, he asked me if Mr. Pitt was like his sister. I told 
 him, Qu'ils se ressembloient comme deux gouttes de feu." 
 
 This highly gifted lady is mentioned by Lord Chesterfield, 
 who says to his son, " The fine Mrs. Pitt, who, it seems, saw 
 you often at Paris, speaking of you the other day, said in 
 French, ***********. , Whether it is that you did 
 not pay the homage due to her beauty, or that it did not strike 
 you as it does others, I cannot determine ; but I hope she had 
 some other reason than truth for saying it. I will suppose 
 that you did not care a pin for her ; but, however, she surely 
 deserved a degree of propitiatory adoration from you, which 
 I am afraid you neglected." 
 
 Mrs. Anne Pitt was maid of honor to Queen Caroline, 
 and privy-purse to the Princess Dowager of Wales. She 
 held these courtly stations when her brother was, at one and 
 the same time, Secretary of State and Prime Minister to King 
 George the Second, and afterwards under his grandson George 
 the Third. 
 
 As the historian is at three thousand miles' distance from the 
 great city of the King, may he not be allowed to guess, that 
 the Pitt family had the facility of knowing the domestic 
 scenes of the royal family almost as well as their own, and 
 the more so from the publicity of a royal palace compared 
 with that of subjects.* Junius mentions the variations of the 
 
 *The following paragraph appeared in Wood fall's paper, Dec. 6, 1771. 
 " We liave the pleasure to assure the public, from the most undoubted 
 authority, that the repeated accounts of her Royal Highness, the 
 Princess Dowager of Wales, being very ill, and her life in great dan-
 
 372 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 King's temper and consequent diet, and appears to know every 
 thing concerning him. 
 
 If we renounce the idea of that sort of domestic aid and assis- 
 tance here suggested, we are aground, — unable to stir an inch ; 
 nay, we are confounded, deeming it an impossibility, or next 
 to it, that an insulated individual, separated, through fear of 
 detection, from every one else, should be able to compose, re- 
 ply, and rejoin, as Junius did, with the necessary copying and 
 every needful preparation for the press, with the very nice 
 business of sure and safe transmission, without the kind of help 
 we have suggested. With it all, the difficulty is great, very 
 great, considering the power of those whom Junius had 
 the audacity to attack. That the writer should be able to pre- 
 serve an uninterrupted chain of epistles of such a peculiar 
 character, and even advertise, that such and such letters to 
 Lord Mansfield should appear on a particular day, and be 
 able to keep his promise undetected, is a surprising thing 
 on any hypothesis, and absolutely wonderful upon any hy- 
 pothesis but the one we have advanced. It is conceivable 
 that a lonely individual might write and stick up an epigram 
 or lampoon every week for years, in different parts of an im- 
 mense city, without an accomplice ; but not a consecutive series 
 of libellous essays, attacking the sovereign, the head of the ju- 
 diciary, the army, very powerful individuals, and, amidst 
 threats, setting at defiance the ability of them all to pull off his 
 mask, or to draw him from his dark recess into light and punish- 
 ment. Such a correspondence between the writer and a dis- 
 tant printer could not have been carried on in the city of 
 Paris, where the police resembles the discipline of a camp ; 
 whereas London had no police until Mr. Colquhoun led the 
 way to something like one. London, before that period, was 
 
 ger, are entirely false." Junius thereupon says, at the close of a let- 
 ter to Che Printer, four days after ; " What do you mean by affirming 
 that the Dowager is better ? / tell you that she suckles toads from 
 morning till night." [She died four weeks after of a shocking cancer 
 in the breast, having used the quack-remedy here mentioned.]
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 373 
 
 governed pretty much like our cities in America by the man-' 
 ners of the people. Allowing for this freedom from espionage, 
 the safe transmission of the letters betokens a management be- 
 yond a common character. " The difficulty of corresponding," 
 says Junius to Woodfall, " arises from situation and necessity, 
 to which we must submit. Your letter was twice refused last 
 night, and the waiter as often attempted to see the person who 
 sent for it." (March 3 and 5, 1772.) We attribute the complete 
 success, in all these difficulties, to a man with a mind, whose 
 sight was infinite, whose schemes were always seasonable and 
 always adequate, and whose power of secrecy was deemed 
 wonderful, while he penetrated the secrets of others, from the 
 monarch, with his floating, morbid humors, to his page ; and 
 from the wretched Princess Dowager with her odious quack 
 remedy to the varied cookery of her perturbed son. The man, 
 to whom we attribute the Letters, was singular and remarkable 
 for his knowledge of minutice, while his august mind and 
 manner overawed majesty. It was well known, that George 
 the Second felt royalty so impaired in his presence, that he 
 conspired to remove him in order to be relieved from his su- 
 periority. This could not be concealed from Mr. Pitt, who, 
 after being called to the helm a second time, preserved that 
 uniform and undeviating course of etiquette, which gained the 
 heart of the aged Hanoverian, and preserved it to the last 
 hour of his life. Something of the same overshadowing 
 influence was felt by the more familiar and gentleman- 
 like George the Third. In the memorable audience at the 
 Queen's palace in 1763, which lasted three hours, it was 
 generally supposed, that the great master of eloquence over- 
 powered the judgment of the King, and led it captive ; * for, 
 
 * Dr. Franklin has remarked, that, in his conversations with Lord 
 Chatham on the subject of his plan for settling the troubles in Ameri- 
 ca, he was so full and diffuse, that he could not interrupt him with a 
 remark, nor go through half of his own memorandums. He adds, 
 "He is not easily interrupted, and I had such pleasure in hearing him, 
 that I found little inclination to interrupt him." Such is the power of 
 a superior mind sublimed by eloquence.
 
 374 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 at a second audience, two days after, the King retraced his 
 steps, and excused himself from following the advice given, 
 with saying, that his word was passed, and his honor concern- 
 ed, — a fresh evidence of that secret influence complained of in 
 the earliest part of the reign of that unhappy monarch. 
 
 If we weigh what has been said, to whom but to this great 
 Statesman, consummate orator, and remarkably gifted man, 
 can we attribute the golden pages of Junius ? — for such they 
 truly are compared with any prose writings in our language. 
 Unique as was the manner, doctrine, style, and temper of Lord 
 Chatham, yet he resembles the man behind the curtain, more 
 than any other character hitherto mentioned as the supposed 
 author of the Letters ; and the parallel passages, cited from 
 the speeches of the one and the writings of the other, seem to 
 put it beyond doubt. 
 
 Lord Chatham was a domestic man, made so by his arthritic 
 infirmities ; so was Cardinal Richelieu. Both were abstracted 
 from the fashionable world. Both discarded ceremonial le- 
 vees, dinners, and suppers, — those moths of time, health, and 
 study. Both were great ministers ; both brilliant in literature. 
 Thus situated and circumstanced, and withdrawn from Parlia- 
 ment, who so likely to give vent to his mixed feelings, per- 
 sonal and patriotic, and who more favorably situated for it, 
 than Lord Chatham ? No one will suppose me to insinuate, 
 that he needed any one to help him think, or to express what 
 he thought. We only insist, that, crippled and enfeebled, it was 
 his happy lot to be blest with two very able. amanuenses, — one 
 of them another self, a pearl of great price, — and the other, his 
 brilliant sister, a second jewel in his Urim and Thummim. 
 From such a pectorale sparks of light, truth, and intelligence 
 must have been elicited, in their solemn retirement, amid sober 
 reflections on the varied scenes of their past honorable lives. 
 " It is gratifying to reflect," says the biographer of Chatham,* 
 " that he, who had devoted his life to the severest application 
 
 * Thackeray.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 375 
 
 in the public cause, should have had so accomplished and in- 
 teresting a family, to soothe his declining years, and to exhila- 
 rate his hours of relaxation. Few men were able to enjoy 
 these blessings with a juster sense of their value. Ambition," 
 says he, " may have indurated some feelings of his heart in his 
 intercourse with the political world ; but his conduct, in every 
 domestic relation, was, throughout his life, most exemplary and 
 delightful." 
 
 We submit, with peculiar pleasure, this subject of aid from 
 the female head, heart, and hand, of the indoor circle of post- 
 meridian felicity, to the feelings and judgment of the happy in 
 this favored land, with only one remark, viz. If daugh- 
 ters be educated in literature equally with sons, they write as 
 well, and often better, inasmuch as they perceive quicker and 
 discriminate more nicely, have a more delicate taste, and a 
 more correct judgment respecting the consistency and harmony 
 of things in social life. With more patience than men, they are 
 better disposed to that refinement of humanity, defined com- 
 placency, or an inclination that busies itself in pleasing antici- 
 pations, especially where there is the familiarity of intimacy. 
 They generally feel a deeper interest, a greater ambition in 
 aiding their male connexions, than men feel towards one anoth- 
 er, especially in literary matters, in which many of them are 
 keen critics and admirable polishers, after the hammering, 
 rasping, and filing of a stronger masculine hand. The women 
 of France seem to have put all competition at defiance ; 
 not but what England, Switzerland, and America have jewels 
 of the same kind, but occasion has too rarely produced them 
 to view. 
 
 We reiterate, perhaps to tediousness, that the transcription 
 of the Letters of Junius could never have been made by the 
 hand of a hireling, but by the hand of affection, by one em- 
 barked in the same frail vessel, upon a deep and boundless 
 ocean with a threatening sky, where one fate was to befall 
 both. Conceive, thoughtful reader, a great man of Lord 
 Chatham's matchless genius, rare acquirements, and unique
 
 376 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 style of eloquence, that exhausted the richness of our language, 
 sore with keen excitement from extreme ill usage, working 
 up the bullion of his rich mind to a high degree of perfection 
 as it regards form, and assisted by "people about him whom he 
 would wish not to contradict" for the highest possible polish. 
 We need not suppose such aids took the pen of original com- 
 position, but to converse, debate, surmise, suggest, and 
 criticize, and by these and other kindred means, call forth 
 the strong and various powers of the great original himself. 
 It is probable, nay, it is certain, that through co-operating in- 
 tellects, and by similar means, came forth into mimic life, the 
 greatest wonders of Grecian sculpture. We repeat it, — it is 
 the decree of Heaven, and the undeviating order of nature, 
 that no one thing originates and proceeds alone. 
 
 Junius complained sorely, that no one assisted him in the 
 newspapers, blinding himself with poring over papers for au- 
 thorities, — that he was left to do every thing. Hence he was 
 compelled to make his left hand aid his right under the signature 
 of J 3 iiiLO- Junius ; and, before that, under the signature of Do- 
 mitian, Valerius, Brutus, Lucius, and Atticus, to prepare the 
 way for the entrance on the stage of Junius himself. 
 
 The sort of domestic aid and domestic interest in the labors 
 of a public man is not so rare as many imagine. In that 
 pious forgery, entitled Icon Basilike, palmed on the world 
 as the production of Charles the First in his deepest trou- 
 bles, the real author, Dr. Gauden, could not carry on the 
 deception without domestic help. That supererogant di- 
 vine, not contented with the self-satisfaction of increasing 
 vastly the worshippers of " the royal martyr," and enjoy- 
 ing disinterested benevolence, very eagerly sought a meaner 
 reward on the restoration of the Second Charles, by declar- 
 ing that that very popular book, however pious the language, 
 was given to an admiring public by " a lying spirit." To ob- 
 tain pay for it, Dr. Gauden writes to the Secretary of State, 
 ■S.V Edward Nicholas, thus : " The book and the figure were 
 wholly and only my invention, making, and design, in order to
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 377 
 
 vindicate the king's wisdom, honor, and piety. My wife, in- 
 deed, was conscious of it ; and had a hand in disguising the 
 letters of that copy which I sent to the King in the Isle of 
 Wight, by favor of the Marquis of Hertford." * 
 
 Here the lying spirit, though immortal, f could not prevail 
 without domestic help. Milton exposed the deception ; but 
 it was not the fashion of the day to regard the opinion of a re- 
 publican. Lord Clarendon betrayed his knowledge of the 
 fraud, by a private letter to Bishop Gauden upon the Icon 
 BasiUke, and by his total silence on the subject in his history 
 of " the nineteen years' rebellion." J 
 
 In order to effect certain patriotic purposes through 
 Alderman Savvbridge, Junius wrote several private letters 
 to Mr. Wilkes ; two of considerable length, urging this 
 celebrated man to a more magnanimous line of conduct 
 towards the worthy Alderman, than Wilkes seemed capable 
 of. Mr. Charles Butler once sat down with his friend 
 Wilkes to examine, with great and lawyer-like attention, those 
 epistles, with a view of tracing the author of them. Mr. But- 
 ler, in his pleasant Reminiscences, says, that the same hand- 
 writing marks all of them, except the Letter to the King, and 
 it is like that which well-educated ladies wrote about the be- 
 ginning of the century [written 1780] ; viz. a large open hand, 
 regular, approaching to the Italian ; that Mr. Wilkes had a 
 card of invitation to. dinner from old Lady Temple, written in 
 her own hand ; and on comparing it with Junius's Letters, they 
 thought there was some resemblance between them. The 
 Letter to the King was in a hand-writing perfectly different ; 
 a very regular, staid hand, with no difference between the 
 hair-stroke and the body of the letters [as if first written with 
 a lead-pencil, and traced over with ink.] He says that 
 
 * Edinburgh Review for June, 1826. Art. Icon Basilike. 
 
 f "On eagle's wings immortal scandals fly." — Dryde.v. 
 
 J Dr. Johnson, in his Dictionary, quotes from the Icon Basilike as 
 the words of King Charles ; and Dr. Webster, perpetuates the decep- 
 tion in his more valuable Dictionary. 
 
 48
 
 378 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the lines of the letters were very even ; with very few blots, 
 erasures, or marks of hurry. Mr. Butler adds, " that the 
 letters, generally, if not always, were sent in an envelope 
 (which was then by no means general as it now is), and in the 
 folding up and the direction of the letter, we thought we could 
 see marks of the writer's habit of folding and directing official 
 letters." In a little volume of letters, written by the Earl of 
 Chatham to his nephew Lord Camelford, a youth at College, 
 one dated from the pay-office, April 15, 1755, concludes thus. 
 " Inclose your letters in a cover ; it is more polite." From 
 all which we learn, that the use of an envelope, though rare at 
 that day, was habitual with Lord Chatham and with Junius. 
 Lawyers know the weight of circumstantial evidence. Mr. 
 Wilkes said, that the manner in which Junius corrected the 
 printed sheets showed, that he was accustomed to such an em- 
 ployment, and had a familiar use of the marks of printers in 
 correcting proof-sheets. 
 
 " We thought" says Mr. Butler, " his high-wrought pane- 
 gyric of Lord Chatham loas ironical." So that it never 
 came into their heads as into ours, that his Lordship wrote it 
 himself. 
 
 We understand that Robert Wood, Esq., a gentleman well 
 known for his learned and valuable publications, was, for a long 
 series of years, private secretary to Mr. Pitt, and afterwards of- 
 ficial under-secretary while Lord Chatham was in the govern- 
 ment. Dr. Franklin mentions the same gentleman in his 
 Memoirs, and says, "When I came to England in 1757,1 
 made several attempts to be introduced to Lord Chatham, then 
 Mr. Pitt, at that time first minister, on account of my Penn- 
 sylvania business, but without success. He was then too great 
 a man, or too much occupied in affairs of great moment. I 
 was therefore obliged to content myself with a kind of non- 
 apparent and unacknowledged communication through Mr. 
 Potter and Mr. Wood, his secretaries, who seemed to culti- 
 vate an acquaintance with me by their civilities ; and drew 
 from me what information I could give relative to the Ameri-
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 37O 
 
 can war, with my sentiments, occasionally, on measures that 
 were proposed or advised by others ; which gave me the op- 
 portunity of recommending and enforcing the utility of con- 
 quering Canada. [Between 1757 and 1758.] I afterwards 
 considered Mr. Pitt as inaccessible." 
 
 Mr. Butler has an interesting Chapter on the Letters of Ju- 
 nius. Near the close of it is this paragraph. 
 
 " Mentioning, in one of his letters to Woodfall, the edition, 
 which that gentlemen then projected of his Letters, Junius 
 says, 'When the book is finished, let me have a set bound 
 in vellum, gilt and lettered, as handsome as you can, — the 
 edges gilt ; — let the sheets he well dried before binding? " 
 
 " Who," says Mr. Butler, " is the fortunate possessor of 
 these two vellum volumes ? — The Reminiscent knows as little 
 as the rest of the world, — but thinks it was not unknown to 
 the founder of a noble house, to which the public owes an 
 edition of Homer, which does the nation honor." Thus far 
 Mr. Butler. 
 
 Now who was the editor of this highly extolled edition of 
 Homer ? He was Robert Wood, Lord Chatham's private 
 secretary, just mentioned. Who was the founder of a noble 
 house to whom the public is indebted for that learned work ? 
 It was the grand nephew of Lady Chatham, and places the 
 vellum volumes, about where we had long since conjectured they 
 might be found, — in the Grenville Family, a mere sketch 
 of which we have presumed to make and hold up to our 
 readers. 
 
 Four years after this was written, there appeared the follow- 
 ing article in one of our newspapers, copied from a London 
 paper called " The Globe,'''' viz. 
 
 " Five letters are deposited in the archives of the Grenville 
 family at Stowe, xohich establish, beyond the possibility of 
 doubt, the real author of Junius. This eminent individual 
 was politically connected with Mr. George Grenville, the grand- 
 father of the present Duke of Buckingham, from whom these 
 autograph proofs have descended to the present possessor.
 
 380 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 The venerable Statesman, nearly allied to the Duke of Buck- 
 ingham, has requested the discovery should not be published 
 during his life-time. It is, however, confidently asserted, that, 
 in all the controversies relating to these celebrated Letters, 
 the author has not been named." 
 
 After reaching an age when that great comfort of human 
 life, vanity, is commonly evaporated, if I have made a dis- 
 covery by pursuing the road of patient induction, while others 
 have failed in their search by wandering upon a fenceless com- 
 mon, I hope to be allowed the enjoyment of its few remaining 
 drops ; for during forty years I have preserved a steady opin- 
 ion, and often expressed it, that no man could have felt and 
 written like Junius, save William, Pitt, Earl of Chatham. 
 He was acquainted with the deep disorder in the state of 
 Britain ; and to cure it, like a skilful physician, used only 
 Herculean remedies. 
 
 Englishmen ! erect a Temple to your Magnus APOLLO ! 
 lest we Americans get the start of you ! 
 
 On the seventh of April, 1778, Lord Chatham, in a very 
 feeble state, of health was led into the House of Peers by his 
 son William, and his son-in-law, Lord Mahon. He was 
 dressed in a rich suit of black velvet, and covered up to his 
 knees in flannel. He looked like a dying man, yet never was 
 seen a figure of more dignity.* He appeared like a being of 
 superior species. The Lords stood up, and made a lane for 
 him to pass to his seat, whilst, with a gracefulness of deport- 
 ment, for which he was so eminently distinguished, he bowed 
 to them as he proceeded. Having taken his seat, he listened 
 to the speech of the Duke of Richmond with the most pro- 
 found attention. The Duke, at the close of the grand com- 
 mittee of inquiry, which sat during the greater part of the ses- 
 sion, moved an address to the throne, recapitulating the ex- 
 penses, misconduct, and losses of the war ; intreating the Sov- 
 
 * See Thackeray, and Seward's Anecdotes.
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 381 
 
 ereign to dismiss his ministers ; advising him to withdraw all 
 his force s by sea and land from the revolted provinces, and to 
 adopt amicable means only to recover their friendship, at least, 
 if not their allegiance. This question of independence was 
 enough to kindle all Lord Chatham's English enthusiasm. 
 
 After Lord Weymouth had spoken against the address, 
 Lord Chatham rose with slowness and difficulty from his 
 seat, leaning on his crutches, and supported by his two rela- 
 tions. He took one hand from his crutch and raised it, cast- 
 ing his eyes towards Heaven, and said "J thank God that I 
 have been enabled to come here this day, to perform my duty, 
 and to speak on a subject which is so deeply impressed on my 
 mind. I am old and infirm, — have one foot, — more than one 
 foot, — in the grave. I have risen from my bed, to stand up in 
 the cause of my country, — perhaps never again to speak in 
 this House ! " 
 
 The reverence, the attention, the stillness of the House 
 were here most affecting ; had any one dropped a handker- 
 chief, the noise would have been heard. 
 
 At first, Lord Chatham spoke in that low and feeble tone 
 which is characteristic of severe indisposition ; but as he grew 
 warm, his voice rose, and became as harmonious as ever ; 
 oratorical and affecting, perhaps more so than at any former 
 period. He recounted the whole history of the American 
 war, the measures to which he had objected, and all the evil 
 consequences which he had foretold ; adding, at the end of 
 every period, " And so it proved." 
 
 In one part of his speech, he ridiculed the apprehension of 
 an invasion, and then recalled the remembrance of former in- 
 vasions. " A Spanish invasion, a French invasion, a Dutch 
 invasion, many noble Lords must have read in history ; and 
 some Lords (looking sternly at Lord Mansfield,*) may re- 
 member a Scotch invasion. 
 
 * Chatham retained his antipathy towards Mansfield to his last 
 breath !
 
 382 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 " I rejoice, my Lords, that the grave has not closed upon 
 me, that Lam still alive to lift up my voice against the dismem- 
 berment of this ancient and most noble monarchy ! Pressed 
 down as I am by the hand of infirmity, I am little able to as- 
 sist my country in this most perilous conjuncture ; but, my 
 Lords, while I have sense and memory I will never consent to 
 deprive the royal offspring of the House of Brunswick, the 
 heirs of the Princess Sophia, of their fairest inheritance. I 
 will first see the Prince of Wales, the Bishop of Osnaburg, 
 and the other rising hopes of the royal family, brought down to 
 the committee, and assent to such an alienation. Where is 
 the man that will dare to advise it ? My Lords, his Majesty 
 succeeded to an empire as great in extent as its reputation was 
 unsullied. Shall we tarnish the lustre of this nation by an ig- 
 nominious surrender of its rights and fairest possessions ? 
 Shall this great kingdom, that has survived, whole and entire, 
 the Danish depredations, the Scottish inroads, and the Nor- 
 man conquest ; that has stood the threatened invasion of the 
 Spanish armada, now fall prostrate before the House of Bour- 
 bon ? Surely, my Lords, this nation is no longer what it was ! 
 Shall a people, that, seventeen years ago, was the terror of the 
 world, now stoop so low as to tell its ancient, inveterate ene- 
 my, ' Take all we have, only give us peace ? ' It is im- 
 possible ! 
 
 " I wage war with no man or set of men. I wish for none 
 of their employments ; nor would I co-operate with men who 
 still persist in unretracted error ; or who, instead of acting on 
 a firm, decisive line of conduct, halt between two opinions, 
 where there is no middle path. In God's name, if it is abso- 
 lutely necessary to declare either for peace or war, and the 
 former cannot be preserved with honor, why is not the latter 
 commenced without hesitation ? I am not, I confess, well in- 
 formed of the resources of this kingdom, but I trust it has still 
 sufficient to maintain its just rights, though I know them not. 
 But, my Lords, any state is better than despair. Let us, at 
 least, make one effort ; and if we must fall, let us fall like 
 men ! "
 
 TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSMISSION OF THE LETTERS. 383 
 
 In the course of his speech in reply to Lord Chatham, the 
 Duke of Richmond said, that " he did not doubt but the 
 name of the Earl of Chatham (he begged to apologize for 
 mentioning his Lordship by name) would rouse the spirit of 
 the nation. But that name, great and mighty as it was, could 
 not gain victories without an army, without a navy, and without 
 money. If a large fleet of French ships met a few of ours, 
 did the noble Earl think, that merely telling them that the 
 Earl of Chatham had the conduct of public affairs, would pre- 
 vent us from being beaten ? If the fleet passed our ships, and 
 the French effected an invasion, did the noble Earl imagine, 
 that merely telling the invaders that Lord Chatham was the 
 minister, and that he had roused the spirit of the nation, 
 would induce them to re-imbark and abandon their purpose?" 
 During this and some other parts of the Duke's clumsy 
 speech, Lord Chatham indicated, in countenance and gesture, 
 symptoms of emotion and disgust. When the Duke of Rich- 
 mond sat down, Lord Chatham made an eager effort to rise, 
 as if laboring with some great idea, and impatient to give ut- 
 terance to his feelings. But the body was unable to sustain 
 the energies of the mind. After repeated attempts to retain 
 his erect position, he suddenly pressed his hand to his great 
 heart and fell. He lingered to the eleventh of the month fol- 
 lowing, when he died at his seat in Hayes. 
 
 His firmness of mind was remarkable. On his death-bed 
 he said to his son, who was about to depart for Gibraltar, but 
 was unwilling to leave his father, " Go, my son, go where 
 your country calls you ; let her engross all your attention ; 
 spare not a moment, which is due to her service, in weeping 
 over an old man who will soon be no more"
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE THE THIRD. 
 
 Although Junius observed proper respect for the Throne, 
 it is manifest that he entertained a personal dislike to the King. 
 This is a delicate subject ; yet we must touch it. The official 
 character of George the Third and the history of the Ameri- 
 can revolution and independency, are so interwoven, that we 
 cannot separate them, without making an unseemly rent in the 
 web of our narrative. One reign has passed away since that 
 monarch's death, and another has just commenced. This 
 allows us to speak of him with the same freedom as of any 
 crowned head that preceded him. 
 
 Junius disdains to disguise his contempt of the Duke of 
 Grafton, his antipathy to Lord Mansfield, and his abhorrence 
 of the characters of the Duke of Bedford and of Lord Bar- 
 rington ; and though he tries to throw a veil over his dislike 
 of the King, we now and then discover the truth under some 
 corners of it, which sudden gusts of resentment blow aside. 
 Like Junius and like Lord Chatham, we Americans al- 
 ways maintained a theoretical reverence for the Sovereign, 
 even from the year 1766 to 1776. Then, indeed, what had 
 been, for ten years, dammed up, broke loose and inundated 
 loyalty at once among those in authority, while the people 
 as usual observed no degrees of comparison in their expres-
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 385 
 
 s'ons of regal criminality. Adhering conscientiously to their 
 i ational character, they spoke daggers, but used none.* 
 
 It was the political character and conduct of George the 
 Third which gave birth to Junius. Had his uncle, the Duke 
 of Cumberland, ascended the throne, the Princess Dowager 
 and her son George would have dwelt in comparative privacy, 
 and neither Junius, nor his harbinger, " The North Briton," 
 wotdd have ever appeared, nor the name of John Wilkes have 
 ever been heard beyond the smoke of his chimney. 
 
 The private character of George the Third was almost in 
 every respect unexceptionable. He was correct in les mceurs, and 
 distinguished in les bienscances ; his court was chaste, his queen 
 discreet and remarkably circumspe ', and their children rigid- 
 ly governed as regarded their religious creed, and in the Ger- 
 man system of etiquette. There was an easy, gentleman-like 
 demeanor in the King, that hardly ever betrayed a consciousness 
 of his very high station ; which is remarkable, as in his national 
 government and political measures and conduct, there was 
 something like an unbending self-sufficiency, and unremitting 
 adherence to maxims of state, partly German and partly 
 Scotch, imbibed at an early period of life, before experience 
 had time to judge of and correct them. 
 
 The English people were delighted with the novel circum- 
 stance of having a native-born King " to go in and out before 
 them ; " and the Scotch were greatly pleased at seeing one of 
 their own noblemen the acknowledged favorite of the court, 
 and another at the head of the judiciary. The whole realm 
 appeared to rejoice that they had at length an Englishman on 
 the throne, not tied to Hanover by a natural feeling, or to 
 France, Italy, or Germany, by uxoriousner.s. The public 
 magnified every praiseworthy act in the young monarch, such 
 
 * During a period of great excitement and resentment in Boston 
 against Stir Fran is Barnard, one of the English Commissioners asked 
 the Governor if he was not afraid to walk the streets and over his 
 farm unarmed and alone. He replied, " Not in the least. The Ameri- 
 cans are not a bloody-minded people.'''' 
 
 49
 
 386 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 as making the judges independent of the crown, and liberating 
 a poor Roman Catholic from a Jong, rigorous imprisonment 
 for the crime of worshipping God according to the dictates of 
 his own conscience. They considered this just and this mer- 
 ciful deed as a sure presage of a wise and glorious reign. The 
 novelty-loving English were enraptured with their affable King ; 
 his levee being such a contrast to that of his grandfather, 
 which had some resemblance to a lion's den. In comparing 
 the beginning of the reign of George the Third with the very 
 sad scenes which attended its latter years, one of the historians 
 of his reign* quotes a passage from Grafs "Bard," as appli- 
 cable to the splendor of its dawn and " its subsequent fatal 
 indiscretions." 
 
 " Fair laughs the mom, and soft the zephyr blows, 
 
 While proudly riding o'er the azure realm 
 
 In gallant trim the gilded vessel goes ; 
 
 Youth at the prow, and pleasure at the helm ; 
 
 Regardless of the sweeping whirlwind's sway, 
 That, hush'd in grim repose, expects his evening prey." 
 
 If this were the impression of the wavering public re- 
 specting the character of George the Third, some men of su- 
 perior sagacity differed from them. Lord Camden, then At- 
 torney-General Pratt, said to George the Second's physician, 
 about four months after the intoxication of the coronation was 
 past, " I see already that this ivill be a weak and inglorious 
 reign." It was occasionally whispered, that the King was very 
 obstinate, and would be influenced by none but his mother 
 and Lord Bute. An opinion prevailed, that this Scotch noble- 
 man suggested political opinions and conduct to the Dowager, 
 and she to her son ; but this was hardly correct. She was the 
 source of the baleful influence of which patriotism complained. 
 Bute imbibed her opinions and enforced her directions. She was 
 undoubtedly a shrewd and knowing woman ; yet Earl Walde- 
 grave, possibly a little blinded by disgust, denies to her superior 
 talents or more than an ordinary understanding, while her polit- 
 
 * Belsham.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 387 
 
 ical notions were more becoming a Polish or Hungarian noble- 
 man, than the instructress of a British prince. She incessantly 
 inculcated on her son, — " Be King, and be not shackled by the 
 Whigs, as was your grandfather ; " and George never forgot 
 the lesson. 
 
 John Nicholls, Esq., a distinguished member of Parliament, 
 and son of Dr. F. Nicholls, physician to George the Second, 
 and author of " Recollections and Reflections, Personal and 
 Political, as connected with Public Affairs, during the Reign 
 of George the Third," after saying that the King was sober, 
 temperate, of good domestic habits, addicted to no vice, and 
 swayed by no passion, adds, " that the whole tenor of his life 
 has justified the impression that he was not a weak man ; but 
 that his objects were little and injudiciously chosen ; and that, 
 so far from his reign being marked by favoritism, he has never 
 appeared to entertain kindness for any minister employed, ex- 
 cept for the Earl of Bute ; and that because he was educated 
 by his mother." She had formed her ideas of sovereign 
 power at the court of her father. In Saxe-Gotha, the Sove- 
 reign's personal wishes and opinions are to be obeyed, and he 
 is his own minister ; in Great Britain, the Sovereign is to 
 choose for his ministers those whom he thinks best qualified to 
 advise measures beneficial to the country. If he does not ap- 
 prove of the measures they recommend, he may remove his 
 ministers and appoint others ; but whatever measures are car- 
 ried into effect, the advisers ought not only to be responsible, 
 but distinctly known and recognised as the advisers. This is not 
 an opinion which has been theoretically adopted by those who 
 have treated of the English constitution ; it has been explicitly 
 declared in Parliament. It completely negatives the idea of 
 the King being his oivn minister. The sentiment, which the 
 Princess Dowager had most anxiously impressed on the King's 
 mind was this ; that he should be his own minister ; that 
 he should vigilantly observe every attempt of his ministers to 
 assume a control over him, and use his endeavours to prevent 
 it. The Princess Dowager was led to enforce this senti-
 
 388 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ment on the mind of her son, not only from the manner in 
 which she had seen sovereign power exercised in her father's 
 court, but also from the control which she had seen exercised 
 by the Pelham party over George the Second. The wish to 
 be his own minister, and to exercise his power personally, was 
 the leading feature in George the Third's character through 
 his whole reign. It influenced his domestic as well as his po- 
 litical conduct. There does not appear any interval, in which 
 this sentiment was suspended. 
 
 We now clearly understand the remarks of Junius,* when 
 he says, that " Few nations are in the predicament that we 
 are, to have nothing to complain of but the filial virtues of our 
 Sovereign. Charles the First had the same implicit attach- 
 ment to his spouse." — " In respect to her Royal Highness, I 
 shall deliver my sentiments without any false tenderness or re- 
 serve. I consider her not only as the original creating cause 
 of the shameful and deplorable condition of this country, but 
 as a being, whose operation is uniform and permanent, who 
 watches, with a kind of providential malignity, over the work 
 of her hands, to correct, improve, and preserve it. If the 
 strongest appearances may be relied on, this lady has now 
 brought her schemes to perfection. Every office in govern- 
 ment is filled with men who are known to be her creatures, or 
 by mere ciphers incapable of resistance. Is it conceivable, 
 that any thing less than a determined plan of drawing the 
 power of the crown into her own hands, could have collected 
 such an administration as the present? Who is Lord North ? 
 The son of a poor unknown Earl, who, four years ago, was a 
 needy commissioner of the treasury for the benefit of a sub- 
 sistence, and who would have accepted a commission of hack- 
 ney coaches upon the same terms. The politics of Carlton- 
 house, finances picked up in Mr. Grenville's ante-chamber, 
 and the elocution of Demosthenes, endeavouring to speak plain 
 with pebbles in his mouth, form the stuffing of that figure which 
 
 * Domitian, January 17, 1771, recognised by Junius.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 389 
 
 calls itself minister." [What Is here said of Lord North is, 
 be sure, lampoonical, but riot a word impeaching his character 
 as an honorable and able man.] Of die Dowager, Junius 
 furthermore remarks, that, " Gifted as she is, she could hard- 
 ly fail of success [in preventing war with Spain], if the quar- 
 rels of nations bore any resemblance to domestic feuds, or 
 could be conducted upon the same principle's. The genius of 
 Queen Elizabeth united the nation, collected the strengdi of 
 the people, and carried it forward to resistance and victory. 
 When the demon of discord sits at the helm, what have we to 
 expect but distraction and civil war at home, disgrace and in- 
 famy abroad ? " 
 
 Oliver Cromwell, Frederic of Prussia, and Napoleon 
 Bonaparte were their own ministers, and well they might be ; 
 but for George the Third to undertake, as in 1764, the kingly 
 power personally, showed the folly of his German instructress, 
 and the weak judgment of the man. Hence we account for 
 his extreme pertinacity in the attempt to tax these colonies 
 without their consent, after such a profound lawyer as Lord 
 Camden and such a consummate politician as Lord Chatham 
 had solemnly declared, that neither the King nor the Parlia- 
 ment, nor all three together, had a legal right to do so. The 
 stamp act was undoubtedly the favorite measure of the King, 
 and not of George Grenville, whom he dismissed, because he 
 found him not sufficienily subservient to all his American views; 
 he discarded the Marquis of Rockingham because he repealed 
 the stamp act, and took into his service, as minister, the more 
 pliant Duke of Grafton, who, it was given out at court, was to 
 act under the guidance of Lord Chatham, but who was ac- 
 tually found willing to leave him and pursue the advice of the 
 secret, irresponsible cabinet, in which Mr. Jenkinson, Lord 
 Bute's quondam, private secretary, had more power than 
 the ostensible minister. But when his majesty found that 
 the great lawyer, his most obedient friend, Lord Mansfield, 
 could give him neither clear law nor precedent for taxing an 
 English subject without his consent, he had recourse to craft ;
 
 390 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 but the great master of it, Charles Townsend, made but a 
 bungling piece of work in forcing a mixture of tea and pain- 
 ters' colors down the throat of nauseated America. Then 
 came force with all his terrors, — fire and sword, hlood and 
 ashes. The fight-loving Scotchmen shouted for war, and one 
 of them, not satisfied with the usual instruments of it, most loy- 
 ally invoked starvation ! * 
 
 Not only the scattered remnants of the old Tory faction glad- 
 ly rallied to the cause, but the veteran and faithful band of 
 placemen, pensioners, and bribed representatives came smiling 
 in as volunteers. This will surprise no man ; but that a great 
 majority of the clergy of the Episcopal Anglican church should 
 hasten to rally under the banner of a deluded King, busy, vin- 
 dictive, and blind to consequences, mistaking obstinate inflexi- 
 bility for dignity, is a matter for surprise and mortification. 
 We could bear unmoved the abuse of Lords Suffolk, Gower, 
 and Sandwich, by returning contempt for contempt ; but to be 
 stigmatized, from the sacred desk, as a herd of fanatics and 
 hypocrites, and called Puritans by way of reproach, — a term 
 more hateful to the high church than infidel or atheist, — was 
 more than surprising ; it was shocking. It was somewhat so, 
 as far as they dared, in this country. The virulent language 
 used at that time against the colonies, at the court-end of Lon- 
 don, at Oxford, and Edinburgh, was in the same illiberal, an- 
 ti-Christian style. f The period referred to was when Bur- 
 goyne's fine army was about embarking for America, in the 
 highest flow of spirits and the utmost glee, like a hunting party 
 with the best omens of a fine chase ! 
 
 Distrusting my own feelings, on such heart-moving topics, I 
 turn, whenever I can, to the opinions of the wise, great, and 
 impartial, neither British nor American. Can I go much 
 higher than that of Frederic, the renowned King of Prussia, 
 distinguished among monarchs, as a Hero, Philosopher, and 
 Statesman ? 
 
 * Wedderburne, the vilifier of Franklin before the privy council. 
 f The author was, at that time, in the way of seeing and hearing' 
 what he here relates, in England and in Scotland.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 391 
 
 " England," says he, " at this period, had involved herself 
 in a war with her colonies, undertaken in the spirit ot despot- 
 ism, and conducted in that of folly. It was the Scotchman, 
 Bute, who still governed the King, and directed the councils 
 of the kingdom. Like one of those malignant spirits, who are 
 perpetually talked of, and never seen, he enveloped himself in 
 profound darkness, whilst, by means of his secret instruments 
 and emissaries, he moved the whole political machine at his 
 pleasure. His system was that of the ancient Tories, who 
 maintained the unlimited power of the Crown to be necessary 
 to the public welfare. Haughty and harsh in his deportment, 
 little solicitous as to the selection of the means which he em- 
 ployed in the accomplishment of his purposes, his obstinacy 
 could be exceeded only by his indiscretion ; a civil list of one 
 million scarcely sufficed to gratify the venality of Parliament. 
 
 " The English nation, degraded by its Sovereign, ap- 
 peared to have no will separate from that of the court. But, 
 as if this was not enough, the minister, Lord Bute, engaged 
 the King to attempt an arbitrary taxation of the American colo- 
 nies, at once to augment his revenues and to establish a prece- 
 dent which might, at a future time, be imitated in Great 
 Britain. The Americans, whom the court had not deigned to 
 corrupt, * opposed themselves openly to these imposts, so con- 
 trary to their charters, their customs, and to the liberties which 
 they had enjoyed uninterrupted since their first establishment. 
 A wise government would have hastened to appease these 
 growing troubles, but the court of London acted upon oilier 
 principles. The rigor and violence of their proceedings com- 
 pleted the alienation of the Americans. A Congress was 
 convened at Philadelphia, in which it was determined to 
 shake off the English yoke; and from this lime we see 
 Great Britain engaged in a ruinous war with her own colonies. 
 France, the perpetual rival of England, saw with pleasure 
 
 * They tried to corrupt Samuel Adams and a few others, and suc- 
 ceeded only with Benedict Arnold.
 
 392 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 these civil commotions, and secretly encouraged the Ameri- 
 cans to defend their rights against the despotism which George 
 the Third was desirous to establish, by holding out to them a 
 prospect of future succours." * 
 
 We rejoice in being able to adduce the staid opinion of one 
 of the wisest and greatest monarchs of the age upon the con- 
 duct of George the Third towards the North American Colo- 
 nies. Speaking of France, during this quarrel with America, 
 the King of Prussia says, " Strong in her alliance with Spain, 
 and in the assistance thence to be derived, she was watching 
 the moment to fall, like a falcon, upon her prey, and avenge 
 herself upon Great Britain, for the disasters she had suffered 
 during the preceding war. England was, at this time, under 
 the yoke of the Tories, engaged in a ruinous contest, which 
 augmented the national debts thirty-six millions of crowns per 
 annum. For the purpose of striking a blow upon her right 
 arm with her left, she exhausted all her resources, and ad- 
 vanced with hasty steps to her decline and fall. Her ministers 
 accumulated faults ; but of all these the greatest was the war 
 with America, from which no possible advantage could result. 
 She had needlessly, and without reason, embroiled herself with 
 all the surrounding powers ; and to her own misconduct only 
 could England ascribe that slate of desertion and general aban- 
 donment in which she now found herself." f 
 
 In November, 1777, when a flattering address to the King 
 was under debate, Lord Chatham said, " My Lords, this is a 
 perilous and tremendous moment ! It is not a time for adula- 
 tion. The smoothness of flattery cannot now avail, cannot 
 save us in this rugged and awful crisis. It is now necessary to 
 instruct the Throne in the language of truth." — " The extra- 
 ordinary preparations of the House of Bourbon, by land and 
 sea, from Dunkirk to the Straits — the seas swept by Ameri- 
 can privateers — our channel trade torn to pieces by them ! 
 
 * (1 uvr. de Frederic III, Tome VI. 
 
 t GEuvr. de Frederic III, Tome IV. pp. 164, 165.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 393 
 
 In this complicated crisis of danger, weakness at home, and 
 calamity abroad, terrified and insulted by the neighbouring 
 powers, unable to act in America, or acting only to be de- 
 stroyed, where is the man with the forehead to promise or hope 
 for success in such a situation ? You cannot conciliate Ameri 
 ca by your present measures ; you cannot subdue her by your 
 present or by any measures. What then can you do ? You 
 cannot conquer, you cannot gain, but you can address ; you 
 can lull the fears and anxieties of the moment into an igno- 
 rance of the danger that should produce them. But, my 
 Lords, the time demands the language of truth : we must not 
 now apply the flattering unction of servile compliance, or 
 blind complaisance. In a just and necessary war, to main- 
 tain the rights or honor of my country, I would strip the shirt 
 from my back to support it. But in such a war as this, un- 
 just in its principle, impracticable in its means, and ruinous in 
 its consequences, I would not contribute a single effort, nor a 
 single shilling. 
 
 " My Lords, I have submitted to you, with the freedom 
 and truth which 1 think my duty, my sentiments on your 
 present awful situation. I have laid before you the ruin of 
 your power, the disgrace of your reputation, the pollution of 
 your discipline, the contamination of your morals, the compli- 
 cation of calamities, foreign and domestic, that overwhelm 
 your sinking country. Your dearest interests, your own lib- 
 erties, the Constitution itself totters to the foundation. All this 
 disgraceful danger, this multitude of misery, is the monstrous 
 offspring of this unnatural war. We have been deceived and de- 
 luded too long : let us now stop short : this is the crisis — may 
 be the only crisis, of time and situation, to give us a possibility 
 of escape from the fatal effects of our delusions. But if, in an 
 obstinate and infatuated perseverance in folly, we meanly echo 
 back the peremptory words this day presented to us, nothing 
 can save this devoted country from complete and final ruin. 
 We madly rush into multiplied miseries, and confusion worse 
 confounded. 
 
 50
 
 394 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 "Is it possible, can it be believed, that ministers are yet blind 
 to this impending destruction? — I did hope, that, instead of 
 this false and empty vanity, this overweening pride, engender- 
 ing high conceits and presumptuous imaginations — that min- 
 isters would have humbled themselves in their errors, would 
 have confessed and retracted them, and by an active, though 
 a late repentance, have endeavoured to redeem them. But, 
 my Lords, since they had neither sagacity nor foresight, 
 neither justice nor humanity, to shun these oppressive calami- 
 ties ; since not even severe experience can make them feel, 
 nor the imminent ruin of their country awaken them from 
 stupefaction, the guardian care of Parliament must interpose." 
 
 In November, 1777, than which no session of Parliament 
 since the Revolution of 1688, teemed with events more awful 
 to England, the King from his throne said, — 
 
 " It is a great satisfaction to me that I can have recourse to 
 the wisdom of my Parliament in this conjuncture, when the 
 continuance of the rebellion in North America demands our 
 most serious attention. The powers which you have entrusted 
 me with, for the suppression of this revolt, have been faithfully 
 exerted ; and I have a just confidence that the conduct and 
 courage of my officers, and the spirit and intrepidity of my 
 forces, both by sea and land, will, under the blessing of 
 Divine Providence, be attended with important success : 
 but I am persuaded that you will see the necessity of pre- 
 paring for such further operations as the contingencies of the 
 war, and the obstinacy of the rebels may render expedient ; 
 and if I should have occasion to increase them, by contracting 
 any new engagements, I rely on your zeal and public spirit to 
 enable me to make them good. 
 
 " I receive repeated assurances from foreign powers of their 
 pacific dispositions. My own cannot be doubted." — " I will 
 steadily pursue the measures in which we are engaged for the 
 re-establishment of that constitutional subordination, which, 
 with the blessing of God, I will maintain through the several 
 parts of my dominions : but I shall ever be watchful for an
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 395 
 
 opportunity of putting a stop to the effusion of the blood of my 
 subjects, and the calamities which are inseparable from a state 
 of war. And I still hope, that the deluded and unhappy multi- 
 tude will return to their allegiance ; and that the remembrance 
 of what they once enjoyed, the regret for what they have lost, 
 and the feelings of what they now suffer, under the arbitrary 
 tyranny of their leaders, will rekindle in their hearts a spirit of 
 loyalty to their sovereign, and of attachment to their mother- 
 country ; and that they will enable me, with the concurrence 
 and support of my Parliament, to accomplish what I shall con- 
 sider the greatest happiness of my life, and the greatest glory 
 of my reign, the restoration of peace, order, and confidence 
 to my American colonies." Or, in plain English, — to see 
 America prostrate at my feet. Yes ! from thousands of 
 mouths was uttered at that time this insulting maxim — ' A repeal 
 of our right to tax America cannot be thought of till she is 
 humbled at Lord North's feet ! ' And what was that time, 
 to which we refer ? It was when Burgoyne's army had, thirty 
 days before this speech, laid down their arms, and surrendered 
 to the deluded American militia ! * 
 
 A great majority of the House of Peers voted triumphantly 
 a nattering address — 97 to 28 — replete with terms of appro- 
 bation, thanks, and loyal promises. The House of Commons 
 sung to the same tune ; Parliament adjourned, and its gratified 
 members, and the no less gratified King, enjoyed the festive 
 recess, while the unfortunate Burgoyne, with the remnants of 
 his fine army, passed a sad Christmas on the snow-covered 
 hills now within my sight ; and in the same joyous season 
 America ratified her alliance with France. Previously to the 
 British " holy-days " festivity, Lord Chatham said to his com- 
 
 * The speech was delivered November 18, 1777. Burgoyne sur- 
 rendered on the 17th of October, preceding. After most of his bravest 
 officers were killed, and nearly half his army, the rest laid down their 
 arms, and were marched to this town of Cambridge, where they were 
 cantoned, until Congress ordered them to Virginia, where they re- 
 mained to the time of their embarkation for England and for Germany.
 
 396 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 peers, in a voice of thunder, — " My Lords ! this is a ruinous 
 and ignominious situation, where we cannot act with success, 
 nor suffer with honor ; which calls upon us to remonstrate in 
 the strongest and loudest language of truth, to rescue the ear 
 of majesty from the delusions which surround it. The con- 
 quest of English America is an impossibility. What is 
 your present situation there ? We do not know the worst ; 
 but we know, that in three campaigns we have done nothing, 
 and suffered much. Besides the suffering, perhaps a total loss 
 of the northern army." 
 
 Early in the month of December, 1777, intelligence arrived 
 of the total loss of the northern army ; showing a more ca- 
 lamitous state of things than even the sagacity of Lord Chatham 
 had predicted. The truth could no longer be concealed. 
 Lord North, with deep marks of dejection, and even tears, 
 acknowledged the extent of the disaster, and said that, though 
 unfortunate, his intentions were ever just and upright; that he 
 had been, in a manner, forced Into an office, which he would 
 now willingly and gladly resign, could his resignation facilitate 
 the obtaining that peace and recoiiciliation for which he had 
 ever earnestly wished. Lord George Germaine bore the 
 mortification with more marks of stoicism, saying, in terms of 
 humiliation, that he should be ever ready to submit his con- 
 duct to the judgment of that House. Honest Lord North had 
 been less used to misfortune and disgrace than Minden's hero, 
 and therefore obtained rather more generous pity from the 
 opposition. 
 
 When the catastrophe at Saratoga was communicated to 
 Parliament, a long and profound silence ensued. Amazement 
 and consternation seemed to pervade the house. At length a 
 strong torrent of invective, with taunts bitter and sarcastic, 
 gushed forth from the leaders of the opposition against all the 
 authors of the calamity, save the principal one. They de- 
 nounced the pride, the ignorance, and the incapacity of the 
 planners, counsellors, and ministers of measures which had 
 occasioned more calamity and disgrace to the nation, than had
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 397 
 
 ever befallen the arms of Britain in her most disastrous war. 
 Such was the feeling in their House of Representatives. It 
 was the same in the House of Lords, but mingled with more 
 signs of bitter resentment from deeper wounds of pride. The 
 people out of doors appeared absolutely confounded.* Not 
 being yet directed what to think, they knew not what to say, 
 or how to act. The public for a time, stood idly and stupidly 
 gazing on that portentous meteor which, rolling from the west, 
 blackened all their horizon, and seemed about to burst upon 
 them ! But what were the feelings of the King ? — the author 
 of this calamity and disgrace ! We must gather that from the 
 conduct of " his Friends ;" for suppression and concealment 
 of his feelings was a distinguishing trait in the character of 
 George the Third, and was mistaken for dignity by " his 
 friends," and perhaps by himself. 
 
 Notwithstanding the awful lesson from this side of the Atlan- 
 tic, the self-deluded sovereign soon signified his resolution to 
 persevere in the war against America. He resolved to try 
 again the men-market in Germany. Means were also taken to 
 obtain addresses from the mercantile towns of Liverpool, Man- 
 chester, and several less considerable places in England ; and 
 from the cities of Glasgow and Edinburgh in Scotland. These 
 places evinced their feelings by each raising a full regiment 
 for the use of his Majesty. It is remarkable, that while the 
 king could raise ovAy five thousand troops by private subscrip- 
 tion in England, ten thousand were raised in affectionate Scot- 
 land. In this extraordinary crisis of their national affairs, the 
 crown contrived to have an unusually long recess of Parliament, 
 so that when it convened, the tide of ministerial influence from 
 its lowest ebb appeared to be rising again ; and when it attain- 
 ed its wished for height, the absolute subjugation of America 
 was renevvedly urged in harsher notes than ever. 
 
 After the re-assembling of Parliament, the Commons re- 
 solved themselves into a committee of the whole on the state 
 
 * The author was then an inhabitant of London.
 
 398 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 of the nation, when the capacious-minded and very energetic 
 Charles Fox laid it down as an incontrovertible axiom, that 
 " It was impossible for any country to fall , ivithin so feiv years, 
 from the high pitch of power and glory which we had done, 
 without some radical error in the government ; " — " that 
 the present calamitous state of the nation was evidently to be 
 traced to the blind obstinacy and wretched incapacity of its 
 ministers, who ivould not listen to any overtures of con- 
 ciliation, and who could not carry into effect any plan of 
 coercion." 
 
 Members of Parliament, Peers and Commons, use the terms 
 ministers and ministry theoretically, as they ought in England, 
 where the sovereign is made irresponsible by their constitution, 
 in order to prevent meeting him again on the scaffold, or in the 
 field of blood, while the ministers are the scape-goats by law es- 
 tablished. In these United States it is directly the reverse. 
 The Chief Magistrate is answerable for every measure, and his 
 secretary of State, or prime minister, for none. We, there- 
 fore, when speaking of the attempt to tax us, without our con- 
 sent, and of the consequent warfare, substitute the term King, for 
 that of ministry. All kings are obstinate from the very nature 
 their office. Should it be said that George the Third was con- 
 stitutionally obstinate, the term might possibly bear the con- 
 strained meaning of an equivoque from the tongue of flattery ; 
 I therefore substitute what cannot be twisted awry, — that King 
 George the Third, grandson and successor of George the 
 Second, was, by his peculiar idiosyncrasy, a very obstinate, 
 cold-hearted man, rendered more so by an unfortunate ed- 
 ucation, partly Scotch, but chiefly German, with but little 
 more of the English cast of character than a general sense of 
 justice, and a correct course of domestic and personal morals. 
 When he came unexpectedly to the throne, by the sudden 
 death of his father and grandfather, it was hardly possible 
 that his mind could have been stored with the requisite portion 
 of the science of English government. It must have had 
 blanks on the most important parts of government. His
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 399 
 
 knowledge of America was entire blank — an hiatus valde 
 dejlendus : yet these blanks were hastily filled up, by his 
 mother and Lord Bute, with indelible ink. What could be 
 expected from an honest, dull young man, with no poetry 
 or music within him, thus situated and circumstanced ? " He 
 is strictly honest," says his governor, Earl Waldegrave, " but 
 wants that frank and open behaviour, which makes honesty 
 appear amiable." This distinguished nobleman, and favorite 
 of George the Second, confesses that his task was irksome, 
 and that his spirit and patience were at last exhausted ; — that 
 the mother and the nursery always prevailed, and to them and 
 Lord Bute, it seems, the destined king of Great Britain was 
 left. And he closes his interesting memoirs with this sombre 
 picture of envied grandeur. " The constant anxiety and fre- 
 quent mortifications, which accompany ministerial employments, 
 are tolerably understood ; but the world is totally unacquainted 
 with the situation of those whom fortune has selected to be 
 constant attendants and companions of royalty, who partake of 
 its domestic amusements and social happiness. But I must 
 not lift up the veil ; and shall only add, that no man can have 
 a clear conception how great personages pass their leisure 
 hours, who has not been a prince's governor, or a king's fa- 
 vorite." 
 
 Under the early influence of gossiping conversation, how 
 could a raw, inexperienced, unguarded youth acquire mag- 
 nanimous maxims of state ? He could not obtain them from 
 such a pedlar in politics as Lord Bute, a man void of the least 
 spark of genius, whose constant effort was to make superficies 
 appear solids, and who, with an air of profound wisdom, litter- 
 ed the young monarch's head with trifles, mechanical knick- 
 nacks, and pretty pictures of colored natural history, and 
 systematic botany, baubles, and gimcracks, or varied his 
 nonsense with little tricks of chemistry, the gazing-traps of 
 simpletons, and the ridicule of every legitimate son of science. 
 Had Prince George a single spark of gayety or fun in his 
 composition, it must have excited ridicule of the teacher, gen-
 
 400 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 erating contempt, more fatal to education and kingly govern- 
 ment than even fear or hntred. 
 
 The domestic companions and instructers of the king, una- 
 ble to corrupt his honest heart, or mend it, only hardened it, 
 and warped his young understanding with the falsest notions of 
 men, of things, and of himself. He was taught to believe that 
 men, horses, and dogs, for which Old England was famous, 
 degenerated in America, where nature belittles every thing, 
 save venemous reptiles and noisome insects, and where pejo- 
 rated human nature would naturally approximate the savage, 
 unless restrained by the maternal care and guardianship of 
 henevolent Britannia. 
 
 George the Third carried Lord Bute's routine of solemn 
 trifling pretty much through life. He actually deemed it im- 
 portant to lead his two eldest sons to the love of agriculture, 
 in which they were practically instructed at Windsor to sow, 
 reap, thresh, grind, and sift wheat, to the completion of bread- 
 making. The process of beer-making, and all the curiosities 
 of the brewery, were well known to all his laughter-loving 
 subjects. His rearing the finest breed of merino sheep, ob- 
 tained him the pleasing title of the Royal Shepherd ; and the 
 sale of such as his Majesty did not choose to keep at Windsor, 
 by public auction, at which Sir Joseph Banks presided, and 
 superintended their delivery, — was all so amiably innocent, so 
 simply honest, guileless, and entirely divested of tbe dangerous 
 
 • 
 
 Bonapartean passion, ambition, that I marvel not at the very 
 exalted character given to the sovereign by the poet-laureate, 
 and by almost all the clergy of the eslablisbed church ; for, 
 though trifling in his objects, it does not appear that he was 
 irreligious or cruelly revengeful in his nature, and we charitably 
 hope that, when very wrong, he mistook wrong for right. 
 
 * Peter Pindar,* with his matchless powers of ridicule, could never 
 have set both hemispheres a laughing, had he selected for the subjects 
 of it, either the late King George the Fourth, or the present monarch 
 of England, William IV. 
 
 * Dr. Wolcott.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 401 
 
 Nevertheless, he must have been the primary and efficient 
 cause of the movement in the secret and irresponsible cabinet 
 after February, 1772; for at that period the Dowager died.* 
 By its operation, two systems of administration were formed, 
 one in the real secret and confidence, the other merely osten- 
 sible, to perform the official and executory offices of the state. 
 " This Court Faction,'''' to use the words of Mr. Burke, 
 " proceeded gradually, but not slowly, to destroy every thing of 
 strength which did not derive its principal nourishment from the 
 immediate pleasure of the Court.'''' — " In the beginning of each 
 arrangement, no professions of confidence and support are 
 wanting, to induce the leading men to engage. But while the 
 ministers of the day appear in all the pomp and pride of power, 
 while they have all their canvass spread out to the wind, and 
 every sail filled with the fair and prosperous gale of royal 
 favor, they find, they know not how, a current which sets di- 
 rectly against them, which prevents all progress, which even 
 drives them backwards. That the cabal may be enabled to 
 compass all the ends of its institution, its members are scarcely 
 ever to aim at the high and responsible offices of state. They 
 are distributed with art and judgment through all the secondary 
 but efficient departments of office, and through the households 
 of all the branches of the Royal family. Like Janissaries, 
 they derive a kind of freedom from the very condition of their 
 servitude. The name by which they choose to distinguish 
 themselves is that of the King's Friends." f In the No- 
 
 f It is easily conceivable, that such a cunning arrangement was 
 within the ability of a shrewd woman, whose cast of mind and habits 
 approximated nearer to those of Mary Queen of Scots than to those of 
 Queen Elizabeth ; and that, when once established, this imperium in 
 imperio could be sustained, after her death, by the special aid of Charles 
 Jenkinson, the quondam private secretary of Lord Bute, the confidential 
 adviser of the King and of his Queen Charlotte, the principal spoke 
 in the primary wheel of that internal machinery or clock, to which we 
 have often alluded, and of which the public saw only the face, with its 
 cuckoo, the Duke of G . 
 
 f " Thoughts on the Causes of the Present Discontents." 
 51
 
 402 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 vember session of Parliament, 1779, the Marquis of Rocking- 
 ham, instead of the usual servile echo to the King's speech, 
 moved in the House of Peers an amendment, " to beseech 
 his Majesty to reflect upon the extent of territory, power, and 
 opulence, — of reputation abroad and concord at home, which 
 distinguished the opening of his Majesty's reign, and marked it 
 as the most splendid and happy period in the history of this na- 
 tion ; and to turn his eyes on the present endangered, impov- 
 erished, and distracted state of the empire; and to state to 
 his Majesty, that if any thing can prevent, the consummation of 
 public ruin, it can be only new counsels and new counsellors, 
 a real change, from the conviction of past errors, and not a 
 mere palliation, which must prove fruitless.'" 
 
 Did ever a crowned king receive a more severe and solemn 
 rebuke ? Considering whom it was from, and where delivered, 
 it was a severer denouncement than the American Declaration 
 of Independence, and, one would think, too serious to be made 
 the subject of a monarch's laughter. 
 
 In the House of Commons a similar amendment to the 
 Address was moved by Lord John Cavendish ; a sharp debate 
 ensued, in which Charles Fox was distinguished by his bold- 
 ness. He said that it was not the mere rumor of the streets 
 that the king was his own minister ; but that the fatal truth was 
 too evident to be denied by the members of the administration ; 
 — that it was a doctrine in the highest degree dangerous, to 
 transfer the responsibility of the minister to a personage who 
 could not, by the principles of the constitution, be called to an 
 account." * 
 
 Nor was this all. Mr. Dunning, f in grand committee of 
 the whole House, proposed that it should be resolved, — that 
 " the Influence of the Crown had increased, was increasing, 
 and ought to be diminished" This motion was warmly sup- 
 
 * This defect in the British constitution is wisely remedied in the 
 constitution of these United States, 
 f Lord Ashburton.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 403 
 
 ported by the Speaker of the House of Commons, who, 
 though rarely accustomed to take part in their debates, de- 
 clared that, " on an occasion like the present, he should deem 
 himself criminal in remaining silent ; that the resolution pro- 
 posed contained an allegation which was too notorious to 
 require proof, — which, in its full extent, did not admit oi 
 proof. It could be known only to members of that House, 
 as they were the only persons competent to resolve it. They 
 were bound as jurors, by the conviction arising in their own 
 minds, and were obliged to determine accordingly. The 
 powers constitutionally vested in the executive part of the gov- 
 ernment, were amply sufficient for all the purposes of good 
 government, but its undue influence had increased to a degree 
 absolutely incompatible with every just idea of a limited mon- 
 archy ; — that they were sitting as the representatives of the 
 people, solely for their advantage and benefit, and were pledged 
 to them for the faithful discharge of their trust." 
 
 Another occurrence deserves recording. Earl Goiver, 
 President of the Council, was a most strenuous supporter of 
 the administration, and remarkable for his acrimonious and 
 intemperate opposition to the opinions of Lord Chatham. But 
 at this time, more than a year after that nobleman's death, he 
 testified his change of sentiment, and said " that he had pre- 
 sided some years at the council-table, where he had seen such 
 
 THINGS PASS, THAT NO MAN OF HONOR OR CONSCIENCE COULD 
 
 any longer sit there." This is speaking stronger language 
 than that used by Lord Camden on the same subject. He only 
 said that he often at the council hung down his head with shame. 
 
 In such a humiliating state of things, as it regarded the Su- 
 preme Executive, George the Second would have retired to 
 Hanover, and left the whigs of England to choose a King with 
 sentiments more congenial to their own. 
 
 The war against America commenced in 1775, and con- 
 tinued eight years, during which the arms of the United States so 
 far prevailed as to conquer two British armies, one in the north, 
 commanded by General Bu/goyne, the other in the south,
 
 404 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 commanded by Earl CornwalKs. The people of England, 
 once so fierce for war against us, now clamored for peace. 
 But the king would not listen to it j and it was said that when 
 Lord North told his royal master that he must make peace 
 with America, the King, in a fit of fretfulness, was so overcome 
 with passion as to utter the word impeachment. 
 
 The dignitaries of the church, almost to a man, and the 
 Episcopal clergy generally, made much use of the personal, 
 private, and pious character of the King, and zealously propa- 
 gated the doctrine that the moral and religious character of a 
 King was the circumstance most to be prized by his subjects ; 
 and when the Prince of Wales grew up, the contrast between 
 the father and the son was industriously and malevolently re- 
 marked by the " King's friends," and every courtier. This 
 was the universal language in Canada and Nova Scotia. Mr. 
 Heron, in a note to a passage of the Letter of Junius to the 
 King, speaking of his goodness, virtue, and discretion, says — 
 " How else should he have triumphed over the unpopularity 
 which it was so industriously striven to excite against him, 
 the first twelve years of his reign ? How else should he have 
 retained the fond attachment of his people, amid the disasters 
 of the American war ? Is it not the force of character that 
 has preserved him so much more favor with a nation than his 
 eldest son ? " This writer has not been too well informed on 
 this subject. Neither George the First, Second, nor Fourth, 
 ever met with so many marks of popular hatred and disgust 
 as George the Third, in going to and returning from Parliament. 
 
 It is not worth while for flattery to eulogize the royal 
 character, when such men as Sir George Saville, the Aris- 
 tides of Britain, held this public language to his constituents.* 
 "I at length return to you, with hardly a ray of hope of 
 seeing any change in the miserable course of public calam- 
 ities. On this melancholy day of account, in rendering up to 
 you my trust, I deliver to you your share of a country maimed 
 
 * Sir George Saville was member for the rich county of York.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 405 
 
 and weakened, its treasure lavished and misspent, its honors 
 laded, and its conduct the laughing-stock of Europe ; our 
 nation in a manner without allies or friends, except such as we 
 have hired to destroy our fellow-subjects, and to ravage a coun- 
 try in which we once claimed an invaluable share. 
 
 " Forbearing as well the forward promises as the superficial 
 humbleness of phrase in use on these occasions, I make it a 
 solemn duty to lay before you, without disguise or palliation, 
 the present state of your concerns, as they appear to me, and 
 the gloomy prospect which lies before us. Some have been 
 accused of exaggerating the public misfortunes — nay, of hav- 
 ing endeavoured to help forward the mischief, that they might 
 afterwards raise discontents. I am willing to hope that neither 
 my temper nor my situation in life will be thought naturally to 
 urge me to promote misery, discord, or confusion, or to exult 
 in the subversion of order, or the ruin of property. Trust 
 not, however, to my report : reflect, compare, and judge for 
 yourselves. But under all these disheartening circumstances, 
 I could yet retain a cheerful hope, and undertake again the 
 commission with alacrity as well as zeal, if I could see any 
 effectual steps taken to remove the original cause of the mis- 
 chief: THEN THERE WOULD BE A HOPE. Till the purity of 
 
 the constituent body, and thereby that of the representatives, 
 be restored, there is none. I look upon restoring election 
 and representation in some degree — for I expect no miracles — 
 to their original purity, to be that without which all other efforts 
 will be vain and ridiculous." 
 
 The King of England had not a more respectable subject in 
 point of character and influence than Sir George Saville, and 
 what he said was like a body falling from a great height. Its 
 impression was deep and lasting. Had the people of England 
 more reason to rise up against the conduct of King Charles 
 the First, than against the obstinate conduct of George the 
 Third ? His pertinacity and their forbearance are wonders in 
 the history of England. Who can be surprised at the sharp 
 pen of Junius in lieu of a keener instrument ? It was the indi-
 
 40G CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 redness of the attack upon English liberty through the sides of 
 America, which preserved the third George from the greatest 
 personal calamity. Lord Chatham, and a few more real 
 Whigs were sensible that, in this respect, America was, 
 during eight long years, a battered shield held up to protect 
 even Britannia from the uplifted hand of tyranny. It was not 
 the greatest of misfortunes that England had such a phlegmatic 
 man to succeed George the Second, — a man rather too good 
 for another public warning to deluded monarchs ; and not wise 
 enough to be borne with patient dignity. There must be 
 something rotten in the state of England, to generate such a 
 condition of things, and to excite such universal discontent. 
 George the Third, though born in London, was altogether 
 German. There was no John- Buttery about him. No — his 
 friend, the strong-spoken Lord Thurlow, monopolized that 
 character even to its dregs. 
 
 On the ISth of October, 1781, Earl Cornwattis surren- 
 dered his army at Yorktown to General Washington. The 
 second session of the new Parliament commenced the 27th of 
 the following November, when the King, alluding to that disas- 
 ter, declared in his speech, that " he retained a firm confidence 
 in the protection of Divine Providence, and a perfect con- 
 viction of the justice of his cause ; and called for the 
 concurrence of Parliament in a vigorous, animated, and 
 united exertion of the faculties and- resources of his 
 
 PEOPLE." 
 
 Upon this strange language from the Throne, under these 
 disastrous events and circumstances, a respectable and candid 
 historian* remarks, that the whole speech was plainly indica- 
 tory of a fixed and resolute determination to prosecute a war, 
 of which it might well be supposed that "fools as gross as 
 ignorance made drunk" might by this time have seen the 
 hopelessness and the absurdity. 
 
 This extraordinary speech underwent as severe animadver- 
 sion as the rules of Parliament would allow, particularly from 
 
 * Memoirs of the Reign of George the Third, by W. Belsham, vol. iii.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 407 
 
 Charles Fox, who said that " he and many others expected 
 to hear on this occasion his Majesty declare from the Throne, 
 that he had heen deceived, and imposed upon by misinfor- 
 mation and misrepresentation ; that in consequence of his 
 delusion, the Parliament had been deluded, but that now the 
 deception was at an end ; that instead of requesting the Par- 
 liament to devise the most speedy and efficacious means of 
 putting an end to the public calamities, they had heard a 
 speech breathing little else than vengeance, misery, and blood. 
 Those who were ignorant of the personal character of the 
 Sovereign, and who imagined the speech to originate with 
 him, might be led to suppose that he was an unfeeling despot, 
 rejoicing in the horrid sacrifice of the liberty and lives of his 
 subjects, who, when all hope of victory was vanished, still 
 thirsted for revenge. The ministers, said he, who advised this 
 speech, are a curse to the country over the affairs of which 
 they had too long been suffered to preside." * 
 
 William Pitt, the younger, said on this occasion, " That the 
 duty he owed his Sovereign and his country compelled him to 
 exert every effort to prevent the House from precipitately vot- 
 ing an address, which pledged them to the support of that fatal 
 system which had led this country, step by step, to the most 
 calamitous and disgraceful situation to which a once flourishing 
 and glorious empire could be reduced. Was it becoming the 
 Parliament of a free people to echo back the words which a 
 minister, long practised in the arts of delusion, had dared 
 to put into the royal mouth ? He implored the House not to 
 vote for an address fraught with treachery and falsehood, 
 which could not have been framed by any who felt for the 
 honor of the King, the dignity of Parliament, or the interest 
 of the nation." 
 
 The Duke of Richmond said, in the House of Peters, that 
 the misfortunes of the country were owing to that wretched 
 system of government which had been early adopted in the 
 reign of his present Majesty, and to the influence of that In- 
 
 * Ibid.
 
 408 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 terior Cabinet, which had been the ruin of the country ; 
 and he recalled to the recollection of the House the memora- 
 ble declaration of the Earl of Chatham, " that he was duped 
 and deceived, and that he had not been ten days in the cabinet 
 before he felt the ground rotten under his feet." 
 
 Yet flattering addresses were voted in both Houses, by great 
 majorities. 
 
 On the 12th of December Sir James Lowther said that 
 "the late speech from the Throne had given a just alarm to 
 the nation ; it had shown them that the ministers were deter- 
 mined to persevere in the American war, — that more blood, 
 and more money were to be lavished in this fatal contest ; the 
 men invested with the powers of government derived no ad- 
 vantage from experience, — the surrender of one army only 
 gave them spirit to risque a second, and the surrender of the 
 second only instigated them to venture a third. There was no 
 end of loss and of madness." 
 
 Mr. Poivys, a distinguished leader of that respectable body 
 of men, denominated in England the country gentlemen, fol- 
 lowed in the same track, and said that the war with the Colo- 
 nies was the idol of his Majesty's [ministers;] they had bowed 
 before it themselves, and made the nation bow. The conduct 
 which at the commencement might be denominated firmness, 
 had now degenerated into obstinacy; an obstinacy which 
 called upon all honest and independent men to desert the 
 present administration, unless a change of measures were 
 adopted. 
 
 General Burgoyne took the same side in the debate, and 
 acknowledged that " he was now convinced the principle of the 
 American war was wrong, though he had not been of that 
 opinion when he engaged in the service. Passion and preju- 
 dice," said he, " and interest were now no more, and reason and 
 observation had led him to a very different conclusion: and he 
 now saw that the American war was only one part of a sys- 
 tem levelled against the constitution, and the general rights of 
 mankind."
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 409 
 
 The Secretary for " the American department " Lord 
 George Germaine, stated to the House that the ministry in- 
 tended to change the plan of the war, and not send another 
 army to supply the place of that just captured at Yorktown ; 
 but only to preserve such posts in America, as might facilitate 
 and co-operate with the enterprises of their fleet. This called 
 up that firm and faithful patriot, Sir George Saville, who said 
 that he had not heard the King's speech on its first delivery ; 
 but when it reached him in his retirement, he read it with 
 horror. We are given to understand, said he, that a change 
 is to be made in the mode of conducting the American war. 
 The ministers do not intend to prosecute it in the same manner 
 as before. — Why? Because they could not, if they would. 
 He ridiculed in the most pointed manner, the mean, futile, 
 servile, empty-sounding echoes of the King's speeches. He 
 said the ministers had lost the two hands of the empire in the 
 prosecution of this frantic and ineffectual war. By a continu- 
 ance of it they would risque the head. Such a conduct 
 resembled, if it did not indicate, the violence of insanity. 
 
 General Conway declared himself anxious for the return of 
 the fleets and armies from America. As to the idea now sug- 
 gested, of a war of posts, he asked — what garrisons would be 
 able to maintain them, when it was well known that even Sir 
 Henry Clinton did not consider himself safe at New York ? 
 
 Mr. Pitt reprobated, with an eloquence resembling that of 
 his illustrious father, this renewal of the war on a new plan, as 
 a species of obstinacy bordering upon madness. Nor was the 
 noble city of London silent on this solemn topic. In their 
 petition to the King they implore his Majesty to dismiss from 
 his presence and councils all the advisers, both public and 
 secret, of the measures pursued and contemplated. 
 
 After the King in high displeasure had turned his back on 
 the unfortunate Burgoyne for not performing impossibilities, he 
 thought fit to reward Lord George Germaine with a peerage, 
 which was considered an insufferable indignity to the House 
 
 of Peers, and an outrageous insult to the public. Lord Abing- 
 
 52
 
 410 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ton said of him, " What has that person done to merit honors 
 superior to his fellow citizens ? His only claim to promotion 
 was, that he had undone his country by executing the plan of 
 that cursed invisible though efficient cabinet, from whom as he 
 received his orders, so he had obtained his reward." Before 
 the great seal was affixed to the patent, the Marquis of Car- 
 marthen moved in the House of Peers, " that it was highly 
 derogatory to the honor of that House, that any person 
 laboring under the sentence of a court martial, styled in the 
 public orders issued by his late Majesty, l a censure much 
 worse than death,' and adjudged unfit to serve his Majesty in 
 any military capacity, should be recommended to the Crown 
 as a proper person to sit in that House." Lord George Ger- 
 maine, who had actually taken his seat, rose up and denied the 
 justice of the sentence passed upon him, and affirmed " that 
 he considered his restoration to the Council Board, at a very 
 early period of the present reign, as amounting to a virtual 
 repeal of that iniquitous verdict." 
 
 The Duke of Richmond said that he himself was present at 
 the battle of Minden, and could have proved that the time 
 lost, when Lord George Germaine delayed to advance was not 
 less than one hour and an half, and that his Lordship's cavalry 
 were a mile and a quarter only from the scene of action. Lord 
 Southampton, who was aid-de-camp to Prince Ferdinand on that 
 memorable day, and delivered the message of his Serene High- 
 ness to Lord G. Germaine, vindicated the equity of the sentence. 
 
 Yet such was the overwhelming influence of the Sovereign, 
 and the servility of ninety-three Lords, against twenty-eight, that 
 the " Minden hero " enjoyed a seat in the House of Lords, as a 
 Peer I and it appeared that he never enjoyed himself much out 
 of that House, or at a distance from St. James's. 
 
 Wellbore Ellis, next to Charles Jenkinson, was the most 
 busy, steady, and efficient member of the secret and invisible 
 cabinet. His great zeal in the prosecution of Mr. Wilkes, 
 gave birth to this striking passage in Junius " — " The mine 
 was sunk, combustibles provided, and Wellbore Ellis, the Guy
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 4H 
 
 Faux of the fable, waited only for the signal of command," — 
 which exquisite graphical description gave birth to a satirical 
 engraving, entitled " Gun-powder Plot " ; in which Mr. Ellis 
 was drawn with a lantern, setting fire to the combustibles, pre- 
 pared for blowing up the Constitution ; and Lord Bute in the 
 back ground, with a truncheon in his hand, giving the word of 
 command. 
 
 On the King's raising our old enemy Lord George Germaine 
 to the peerage, Wellbore Ellis was appointed to fill his place 
 as Secretary for the American Department. He informed the 
 House of Commons, in February 1782 — that now [since the 
 capture of Earl Cormoallis and his army] the war was to be 
 carried on against America on a more contracted scale, and 
 that hostilities were to be prosecuted by means very dissimilar 
 from the past. That " the unhappy faction in America, which 
 still continued its resistance to the government of this kingdom, 
 though less numerous than the party of the royalists, could only 
 be rooted out by pushing the war with vigor against France. 
 In order to obtain peace with America we must vanquish the 
 French ; and as in the late war [that carried on by Lord 
 Chatham] France had been said to be conquered in Germa- 
 ny } — go in this America must be conquered in France " ! — 
 Here is a specimen of the wisdom and of the information of 
 a member of the interior cabinet. This strange speech of Mr. 
 Ellis called forth the indignation and contempt of the all-sensi- 
 tive Burke, who said " that the honorable gentleman was 
 indeed an old member, but a young Secretary — that hav- 
 ing studied at the feet of Gamaliel, he had entered into full 
 possession of all the parliamentary qualifications, by which his 
 predecessor had been so conspicuously distinguished ; — the 
 same attachments, the same antipathies, the same extrava- 
 gant delusion, the same wild phantoms of the brain, marked 
 the Right Hon. gentleman as the true ministerial heir and res- 
 iduary legatee of the noble viscount ; and notwithstanding the 
 metamorphosis he had recently undergone, he was so truly the 
 same thing in the same place, that justly might it be said of
 
 412 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 him, " 'Alter et idem nascitur" Being of the caterpillar spe- 
 cies, he had remained the destined time within the soft and 
 silken folds of a lucrative employment, till having burst his 
 ligaments, he fluttered forth the butterfly minister of the day." 
 
 On General Conway's motion " for an address to the King, 
 earnestly imploring his Majesty, that he would be graciously 
 pleased to listen to the humble prayer and advice of his faithful 
 Commons, that the war on the continent of North America 
 might no longer be pursued, for the impracticable purpose of 
 reducing that country to obedience by force," Mr. Ellis op- 
 posed it by a very long speech, of which we have given a 
 short specimen, not much to the credit of the speaker, on the 
 score of information. He was, however, a man of talents and 
 industry, ingenious in evading, palliating, explaining away, and 
 straining precedents. He could magnify trifles, and trace simil- 
 itudes where none ever existed, and deny and assert when the 
 proofs were not within reach : on the whole, he was a very use- 
 ful member of the secret cabinet, a junto, described, or rather 
 alluded to by Junius, in as bitter a paragraph as ever issued 
 from the pen of that matchless writer, viz. 
 
 " Without attempting to account for all the political changes, 
 which have happened since his Majesty's auspicious accession 
 to the Throne, it requires but little sagacity to observe that the 
 general principle, from which they have arisen, is uniform and 
 consistent with itself. A Prince of the house of Brunswick 
 searches for consolation and endearments of private sociality 
 and friendship in the loyal hearts of Jacobites, Tories, and 
 Scotchmen; — a devout Prince, whose sincere, unaffected piety 
 would have done honor even to Charles the First, intrusts the 
 public government of his affairs to Grafton, North, Halifax, and 
 Sandwich. The first choice naturally led to the second. The 
 private convivial hours of Jonathan Wild * were happily unbent 
 in the company of the lower adepts in pilfering and petty 
 
 * A notorious highwayman, and captain of a gang of thieves, cele- 
 brated by Fielding.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 4] 3 
 
 larceny. In public, he resumed his state, and never appeared 
 without an attendant knot of highwaymen and assassins." 
 
 Junius never penned a more impertinent, if not impudent 
 paragraph, than this against the Sovereign, his ostentible, and 
 his secret counsellors. It was contained in a letter to the 
 printer, Dec. 20, 1770, and signed Domitian, and concludes 
 thus — "Give me leave, Mr. Wood fall, to ask you a serious 
 question. How long do you think it possible for this manage- 
 ment to last ? How long is this great country to be governed 
 by a boot and a petticoat ? — by the infamous tools of a Scotch 
 exile, and her Royal Highness the Princess Doivager of Wales'? 
 — by North, Ellis, Barrington, Jenkinson, Hillsborough, Jerry 
 Dyson, and Sandwich ? — I will answer you with precision. It 
 will last, until there is a general insurrection of the English 
 nation, or until the house of Bourbon have collected their 
 strength and strike you to the heart." 
 
 Junius, under the same recognised signature of "Domi- 
 tian," Jan. 17, 1771, says — "His Majesty, God bless him ! 
 has now got rid of every man whose former services or present 
 scruples could be supposed to give offence to her Royal High- 
 ness the Princess Dowager of Wales. The security of our 
 civil and religious liberties cannot be more happily provided for 
 than while Lord Mansfield pronounces the law, and Lord 
 Sandwich represents the religion of St. James's. Such law 
 and such religion are too closely united to suffer even a momen- 
 tary intervention of common honesty between them. Her Royal 
 Highness' scheme of government, formed long before her hus- 
 band's death, is now accomplished. She has succeeded in 
 disuniting every party, and dissolving every connexion ; and, 
 by the mere influence of the Crown, has formed an adminis- 
 tration, such as it is, out of the refuse of them all. 
 
 " There are two leading principles in the politics of St. 
 James's, which will account for almost every measure of gov- 
 ernment since the King's accession. The first is, that the 
 prerogative is sufficient to make a lackey a prime minister, and 
 to maintain him in that post, without any regard to the welfare
 
 414 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 or to the opinion of the people. — The second is, that none but 
 persons insignificant in themselves, or of tainted reputation, 
 should be brought into employment. Men of greater conse- 
 quence and abilities will have opinions of their own, and will 
 not submit to the meddling, unnatural ambition of a mother, 
 who grasps at unlimited power, at the hazard of her son's de- 
 struction. They will not suffer measures of public utility, 
 which have been resolved upon in council, to be checked and 
 controlled by a secret influence in the closet. Such men con- 
 sequently will never be called upon but in cases of extreme 
 necessity. When that ceases, they find their places no longer 
 tenable." 
 
 How consonant is all this to what we have related of the 
 Earl of Chatham, and to what he himself said in the House of 
 Peers, respecting the secret influence, or that influence behind 
 the Throne, greater than the Throne itself. 
 
 We have said already that when the Princess Dowager of 
 Wales found she could not make a Solomon of her son, she 
 resolved to make him a Joseph. Her wish was to marry him 
 to one of the Princesses of the Saxe-Gotha family; but 
 George the Second opposed it, saying he had enough of that 
 already. He strongly recommended a Princess of Bruns- 
 wick, for the transcendency of her person and mind ; but the 
 Dowager was opposed to her as an unfit character for her 
 sober and phlegmatic son, and signified that such a brilliant 
 woman would influence George entirely, which idea militated 
 against her policy ; and so they adopted a middle course, and se- 
 lected Princess Charlotte of Mecklenberg-Strelitz. Mons. 
 Le Montagnard Parvenu says that " Heaven, through the in- 
 termediate agency of the new Secretary of State, Lord Bute, 
 pointed out that Princess for Queen." She was a woman of 
 safe qualities of person, mind, and conduct, not but what she 
 had her opinions, and occasional influence in the interior cabi- 
 net, where her esteemed Mr. Jenkinson was not the least of 
 its influential members.* 
 
 * Charles Jenkinson, late Lord Liverpool, was Solicitor General to 
 the Queen, and greatly confided in by her Majesty.
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 415 
 
 The royal mother had probably a perfectly correct idea of 
 her son's character — a young man of a slow but sure under- 
 standing, of obtuse feelings as it regarded himself and others 
 about him, with more mathematics in his composition, than 
 poetry or music, and commonly obtaining a clear insight 
 into men and things within a narrow compass. She inculcated 
 with entire success the church common-prayer book, and all 
 the mechanical parts of good breeding becoming a perfect gen- 
 tleman. Had his male instructors been equally successful, it 
 might have been better for the realm, and happier for its mon- 
 arch. It seems to us that he had never been wisely instructed 
 in the royal prerogative, down through a long succession of 
 English Kings. That a young monarch ignorant of the world 
 and of himself, should incline his ear to the maxims of the 
 house of Stuart, and to those of Saxe-Gotha, where the sove- 
 reignty is property, and not magistracy as in England, is not much 
 to be wondered at. The intoxicating view of the kingly power 
 as displayed in English law books, is illusive ; there his sacred 
 Majesty is said to be absolute ruler of the State ; supreme judge 
 among its inhabitants ; sole owner of its land ; commander of 
 its forces ; representative of its existence abroad ; fountain of 
 its honors — immortal, infallible, everywhere present, and in- 
 capable of doing or meaning wrong ; and to be a corporation 
 sole.* The distinguished personage invested with such mighty 
 authority is a mere creature of legal theory ; his power in 
 practice is checked ; his defects are supplied in various ways ; 
 he cannot act in any way without some adviser, and some 
 instrument answerable for what is done, which makes the 
 power, in the law book stated to be supreme, in practice 
 exceedingly limited. In a word, this British sovereignty, 
 though an ideal creature, places the King high beyond all com- 
 petition. Hence it is that there is no Christian monarch who 
 is approached with so many tokens of veneration and respect, 
 bordering upon awe, as the Kings of Great Britain, even since 
 
 * See Edinburgh Review for October, 1830, article VIII. Growth of 
 the Royal Prerogative. By John Allen.
 
 416 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 the revolution of 1688. Their footmen or body attendants are 
 noblemen, and the waiting-maids of their Queens a species of 
 nobility. 
 
 The sovereign power of Great Britain is a first-rate man of 
 war, and the most potent ship of the line : — call her, if you 
 please to excuse the jumble of sexes, the Royal George in all 
 its gallant trim, bearing at her mast-head the emblem of sove- 
 reignty with gorgeous decorations — a triple set of officers and 
 a numerous crew, ample stores and warlike equipments — a 
 rapidly moving battery of the heaviest cannon exceeding in 
 number most forts of stone ; a sort of tremendous thunder cloud ; 
 a mischief, undreamt of in Greece and Rome, and beyond their 
 poet's imagination or philosophy's credibility ; a beauty to gaze 
 at — at once the pride, nay, perfection of human art and power, 
 whether we contemplate its construction, arrangement, and econ- 
 omy, or its management to its destined end, by bridling the winds, 
 and making air and water obedient to man's command, while it 
 pours forth fire and destruction, thunder and lightning, on its en- 
 emies, itself being in safety. To complete the wonder, the whole 
 is carried rapidly through the trackless ocean in the darkest 
 night, by the inscrutable influence of a little stone to all appear- 
 ance worthless, giving a fresh instance that, in the affairs of men, 
 Providence uses the smallest and most contemptible means to 
 operate the greatest and most powerful effects. Such is the 
 splendid emblem of the constitutional power of a British King and 
 ministry, the pride of man and the perfection of Art, that distin- 
 guishing attribute of human nature. Yet are the Commons, that is, 
 the people, the Water-, without which the Royal George cannot 
 stir an inch, and which they can at any time draw off by denying 
 supplies, and leave this eighth wonder of the world, aground, ab- 
 solutely immoveable, with no power beyond that of cannon and 
 musquet shot, — to perish, an object of commiseration and 
 tears, rather than of fear and reverence. Such a thing is but a 
 costly pageant, without its origin and support, water, that ele- 
 ment which enters into everything in a growing state, that refresh- 
 es, recruits, and makes fruitful, and which when extracted, that
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 417 
 
 thing perishes and crumbles to dust. If such were not the 
 condition and the fate of Charles the First of England, and 
 Louis the Sixteenth of France, I have read their history to little 
 advantage. — I write for my countrymen. 
 
 It is difficult and hazardous to pronounce on the compound 
 character of a king. We must compare kings with one ano- 
 ther, and not with men in lower and less exposed stations. The 
 late President Jefferson, for whose memory I retain a very great 
 respect without subscribing to all his opinions, says of them 
 in a letter to General Washington dated Paris, May 2, 1788 — 
 " I was much an enemy to monarchies before I came to Eu- 
 rope. I am ten thousand times more so, since I have seen 
 what they are. There is scarcely an evil known in these 
 countries which may not be traced to their king as its source, 
 nor a good which is not derived from the small fibres of repub- 
 licanism existing among them. I can further say with safety, 
 that there is not a crowned head in Europe whose talents or 
 merits could entitle him to be elected a vestry man by the peo- 
 ple of any parish in America." 
 
 In a letter from the same distinguished character to Gov- 
 ernor Langdon of New Hampshire, in 1810, he says, — 
 " When I observed that the King of England was a cipher, I 
 did not mean to confine the observation to the mere individual 
 now on the throne. The practice of kings marrying only 
 into the family of kings, has been that of Europe for some 
 centuries. Now, take any race of animals, confine them in 
 idleness and inaction, whether in a stye, a stable, or a state 
 room, — pamper them with high diet, gratify all their appetites, 
 immerse them in sensualities, nourish their passions, let every 
 thing bend before them, and banish whatever might lead them 
 to think, and in a few generations they become all body and 
 no mind ; and this, too, by a law of nature — by that very law 
 by which we are in the constant practice of changing the char- 
 acters and propensities of the animals we raise for our own pur- 
 poses. Such is the regimen in raising kings, and this is the 
 
 way they have gone on for centuries. While in Europe, I often 
 
 53
 
 418 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 amused myself with contemplating the characters of the then 
 reigning sovereigns of Europe. Lewis the Sixteenth was a 
 fool, of my own knowledge, and in despite of the answers made 
 for him at his trial. The king of Spain was a fool ; of Naples 
 the same. They passed their lives in hunting, and despatched 
 two couriers a week, 1000 miles, to let each other know what 
 game they had killed the preceding days. The King of Sar- 
 dinia was a fool. All these were Bourbons. The queen of 
 Portugal, a Braganza, was an idiot by nature ; and so was the 
 king of Denmark. Their sons, as regents, exercised the 
 powers of government. The king of Prussia, successor to 
 the great Frederic, was a mere hog, in body as well as in 
 mind. Gustavus of Sweden, and Joseph of Austria, were 
 really crazy, and George of England, you know, was in a strait 
 waistcoat. 
 
 " There remained, then, none but old Catharine, who had 
 been too lately picked up to have lost her common sense. In 
 this state Bonaparte found Europe j and it was this state of its 
 rulers which lost it with scarce a struggle. These animals 
 had become without mind and powerless ; and so will every 
 hereditary monarch be after a few generations. Alexander, 
 the grandson of Catharine, is yet an exception. He is able 
 to hold his own. But he is only of the third generation. His 
 race is not yet worn out. And so endeth the book of Kings, 
 from all of which the Lord deliver us." 
 
 Although we must not set aside the moral character of public 
 men in forming an estimate of their merits, yet there is danger 
 of allowing too much weight, when good or when bad. John 
 Wilkes was represented by the courtiers, even by Lord Sand- 
 wich, as too bad to live at large, and his sovereign as too good 
 not to be, in a degree, worshipped. Yet see how these things 
 operate. Had Wilkes possessed a character as good as Sir 
 George Saville's, that, together with his cause, the pen of Ju- 
 nius, the eloquence of Chatham and of Charles Fox, would have 
 placed George the Third where Charles the Tenth of France 
 now is. The domestic character of the British King, his decency
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 419 
 
 and decorum, his assenting conversation, and general becoming 
 behaviour gave great weight to whatever he deliberately pro- 
 nounced, whether from the throne, at the reception of ambas- 
 sadors, or at the levee. Yet Junius * places this to little ac- 
 count, by an artful, and I had like to have said, malignant allusion 
 to the characters of King Edward the Second, and Richard 
 the Second, two among the worst kings of England. After 
 saying that George the Third, for many months, heard nothing 
 from his people but the language of complaint, he adds, that it 
 was the daily triumph of his courtiers that he heard it with an 
 indifference approaching to contempt. He subjoins ; "On a 
 prorogation of parliament, the members retire into summer 
 quarters, and rest from the disgraceful labors of the campaign ; 
 but it is not so with the sovereign, he has a permanent 
 existence ; he cannot withdraw himself from the complaints, 
 the discontents, the reproaches of his subjects ; they pursue him 
 to his retirement, and invade his domestic happiness." Junius 
 adds with as much bitterness as ability these sarcastic remarks — 
 " A new system has not only been adopted in fact, but profess- 
 ed upon principle. Ministers are no longer public servants of 
 the state, but the private domestics of the sovereign. One 
 particular class of men are permitted to call themselves " the 
 King's friends ." as if the body of the people were the king's 
 enemies ; or as if his majesty looked for a resource or consola- 
 tion in the attachment of a few favorites, against the general 
 contempt and detestation of his subjects. Edward and Rich- 
 ard the Second made the same distinction between the collec- 
 tive body of the people, and a contemptible party who sur- 
 rounded the throne. The event of this mistaken conduct 
 might have been a warning to their successors. Yet the errors 
 of those princes were not without excuse. They had as many 
 false friends as George the Third, and infinitely greater tempta- 
 tions to seduce them. They were neither sober, religious, nor 
 demure. Intoxicated with pleasure, they wasted their inherit- 
 ance in pursuit of it. Their lives were like a rapid torrent, 
 
 * Letter XXXIX.
 
 420 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 brilliant in prospect, though useless or dangerous in its course. 
 In the dull, unanimated existence of other princes, we see 
 nothing but a sickly, stagnant water, which taints the atmo- 
 sphere without fertilizing the soil. The morality of a king is 
 not to be measured by vulgar rules. His situation is singular. 
 There are faults that do him honor, and virtues that disgrace 
 him. — A faultless, insipid equality in his character, is neither 
 capable of vice nor virtue in the extreme. — Secluded from the 
 world, attached from his infancy to one set of persons, and 
 one set of ideas, he can never open his heart to new connexions, 
 nor his mind to better information. A character of this sort is 
 the soil fittest to produce that obstinate bigotry in politics and 
 religion, which begins with a meritorious sacrifice of the under- 
 standing, and finally conducts the monarch and the martyr to 
 the block. 
 
 " At any other period, I doubt not the scandalous disorders 
 which have been introduced into the government of all the 
 dependencies in the empire would have roused the attention of 
 the public. The odious abuse and prostitution of the prerog- 
 ative at home, the unconstitutional employment of the military, 
 the arbitrary fines and commitments by the House of Lords, 
 and Court of King's Bench, the mercy of a chaste and pious 
 prince extended cheerfully to a wilful murderer, because that 
 murderer is the brother of a common prostitute, would I think, 
 at any other time, have excited universal indignation. But 
 the daring attack upon the constitution, in the Middlesex elec- 
 tion, makes us callous and indifferent to inferior grievances. 
 No man regards an eruption upon the surface when the noble 
 parts are invaded, and he feels a mortification approaching to 
 his heart." * 
 
 * See Junius to the Duke of Grafton, Letter VIII, on the King's par- 
 doning Edward McQuirk for the murder of George Clark. McQuirk 
 had been active in a mob at Brentford, on the ministerial side in the 
 election of Wilkes, and bis pardon was very generally execrated, 
 while the King would not grant a pardon to the twin brother of Daniel 
 Perreau (a man in gay life condemned for forgery) who was in no
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 421 
 
 From what has been said, collected from Junius, and other 
 high authorities, the American reader will be able to see in a 
 narrow compass, the causes of that discontent of the people of 
 England, which commenced soon after the accession of King 
 George the Third, and prevailed, more or less, from that period 
 to the time when he was compelled, sorely against his will, to 
 relinquish the contest with America ; because he could find no 
 man of sufficient hardihood to become his minister for carrying 
 it on. After the capture of the second army, under Earl Corn- 
 wallis, the least gleam of success in Georgia or in the Carolinas, 
 gave fresh hopes, and renewed force to the monarch's ruling 
 
 way implicated in the crime ; but perjured himself to save, as he hoped, 
 his brother Robert from the gallows. This gentleman was a respectable 
 practitioner of physic in London, kept his carriage, had numerous friends, 
 and was much esteemed. Though condemned as an accessary, no one 
 believed that he would be hanged for a lie. But the public were disap- 
 pointed. The pity excited by Dr. Perreau's hard fate was universal, and 
 his execution was deeply deprecated. The indignation, horror, and dis- 
 gust at the moving sight of the two twin brothers swung off holding each 
 other by the hands, in despite of the earnest intercession of thousands, 
 were loud, deep, and universal. The feeling in the individual, who denied 
 the prayer of the people, was not akin to that which impelled Junius 
 Brutus to order the execution of his own son. It was nearer that of 
 Pharaoh, whose hardness of heart brought plagues innumerable upon 
 the land he misgoverned. I would not deprive a merciful king of a jot 
 of praise merited. George the Third granted a pardon to a certain sex- 
 ton and his partner " a resurrection-man" who were under sentence to 
 be whipped round the bounds of a parish, for taking from a grave the 
 body of a female for one of his best customers to dissect. The anato- 
 mist who employed the man was physician to the Queen, a Scotch- 
 man, and a distinguished favorite in the royal family, having admirable 
 powers of mimetical story-telling, which he often exercised to the great 
 diversion of thefrst man in the realm. The Doctor upon his knees most 
 earnestly implored the pardon of these men, urging that the streets were 
 filled with people ready to tear the culprits to pieces for a deed to them 
 so abhorrent, but necessary to him as a teacher, being, by the king's ap- 
 pointment, anatomical lecturer to the Royal Academy of painting ; and 
 the offenders were pardoned accordingly, however singular in the history 
 of Royal grace !
 
 422 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 passion, the subjugation of America, and his imagined fruits of 
 a rich revenue. But alas ! the shortsightedness of man, and 
 the miscalculation of princes ! — The Alchymists of the middle 
 ages sought for gold and found gun-powder, and so it happened 
 with George the Third in his dreams of riches to be drawn from 
 America. I however put a more charitable construction on most 
 of the errors of the king than Junius has. I believe that the seeds 
 of insanity had sprouted earlier than the ministry, or the peo- 
 ple generally, were apprized of. In 1781, if I am not mistaken 
 by a year, the king turned over two leaves of his largely writ- 
 ten speech from the throne without ever knowing it. The 
 hearers were surprised at its brevity, and the minister mortified. 
 Several members of Parliament in the year 1782, used freely 
 the word insanity, and William Pitt the younger, speaking of 
 the renewal of the war, called it a species of obstinacy, border- 
 ing upon madness ; and so did Sir George Saville. 
 
 Such were the sentiments of the most illustrious of the Eng- 
 lish nation, respecting the great American Question, and the 
 conduct of the King. It would be a departure from justice if 
 we did not record our own complaints, and the reasons of our 
 resistance and final separation from Great Britain, as deliber- 
 ately and solemnly proclaimed in our Declaration of Inde- 
 pendence. 
 
 " The history of the present king of Great Britain, 
 
 is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in 
 direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over 
 these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid 
 world. 
 
 " He has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome 
 and necessary for the public good. 
 
 " He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of im- 
 mediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their 
 operation, till his assent should be obtained ; and when so sus- 
 pended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. He has 
 refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large 
 districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 423 
 
 right of representation in the legislature ; a right inestimable 
 to them, and formidable to tyrants only. 
 
 " He has called together legislative bodies at places un- 
 usual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of 
 their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into 
 compliance with his measures. 
 
 " He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for 
 opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of 
 the people. 
 
 " He has refused, for a long time after such dissolutions, 
 to cause others to be elected ; whereby the legislative 
 powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people 
 at large, for their exercise ; the state remaining, in the mean 
 time, exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and 
 convulsions within. 
 
 " He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these 
 states ; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization 
 of foreigners ; refusing to pass others to encourage their 
 migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropria- 
 tions of lands. 
 
 " He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing 
 his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers. 
 
 " He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for 
 the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of 
 their salaries. 
 
 " He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither 
 swarms of officers, to harass our people, and eat out their 
 substance. 
 
 " He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, 
 without the consent of our legislatures. 
 
 " He has affected to render the military independent of, and 
 superior to the civil power. 
 
 " He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdic- 
 tion foreign to our constitutions, and unacknowledged by our 
 laws ; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation ; 
 " For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us :
 
 424 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 " For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment 
 for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants 
 of these states : 
 
 " For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world : 
 " For imposing taxes on us without our consent : 
 " For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial 
 by jury : 
 
 " For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretend- 
 ed offences : 
 
 " For abolishing the free system of English laws in a 
 neighbouring province, establishing therein an arbitrary gov- 
 ernment, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it 
 at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the 
 same absolute rule into these colonies : 
 
 " For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valu- 
 able laws, and altering, fundamentally, the forms of our 
 governments : 
 
 " For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring 
 themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases 
 whatsoever. 
 
 " He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of 
 bis protection, and waging war against us. 
 
 " He has plundered our seas, ravaged out coasts, burnt our 
 towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. 
 
 " He is, at this time, transporting large armies of foreign 
 mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and 
 tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and per- 
 fidy, scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally 
 unworthy the head of a civilized nation. 
 
 " He has constrained our fellow-citizens, taken captive on 
 the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become 
 the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall them- 
 selves by their hands. 
 
 " He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and 
 has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, 
 the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare
 
 CHARACTER AND POLICY OF GEORGE III. 425 
 
 is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and con- 
 ditions. 
 
 " In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for 
 redress in the most humble terms : our repeated petitions have 
 been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose 
 character is thus marked by every act which may define a ty- 
 rant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people." 
 
 We have recorded the accusation or allegation against 
 George the Third, our former king, as manifested to the 
 world July 4, 1776, by the representatives of the American 
 people in Congress assembled, in the form of a solemn Decla- 
 ration of our Independency. Lest it should appear to contain 
 too deep marks of resentment, we think it fair, in our justifi- 
 cation, to record also the sentiments of an illustrious English- 
 man, we mean the great reformer Junius, respecting the 
 general conduct of his sovereign, as nobly expressed in his 
 famous Letter to the King, in order to show that we were 
 not the only subjects of that monarch who had cause of com- 
 plaint, and that the Whigs, on both sides of the Atlantic, were 
 animated by the same sacred principle of liberty. 
 
 We ask the reader to set before his chastened imagination 
 the character and person of any and every one of those to 
 whom the authorship of this far-famed address has been attrib- 
 uted : and after fixing in his mind the dignity of the scene, 
 let him ask himself whether he can admit any one of them to the 
 honor of being the Mentor to a good-intentioned, moral, but mis- 
 guided king ; and whether our original hypothesis (for we claim 
 to have made the discovery, by induction,) be not reconcilable 
 to his feelings and judgment, viz. that Lord Chatham was this 
 venerable father advising a son. The picture has impressed my 
 imagination nearly forty years — an Aristotle advising, admonish- 
 ing, and controlling an Alexander; — aMagus respectfully, kindly 
 advising, and conscientiously admonishing a young, inexperi- 
 enced Eastern king — a monarch with an honest heart, a very 
 confined horizon, and surrounded with bad examples. To 
 
 54
 
 426 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 express our ideas mythologically ; — it was Minerva in the shape 
 of Mentor, cautioning, advising, and lamenting over his beloved 
 Telemachus, who was left in his cradle to be educated by his 
 mother and other women, while his knight-errant of a father 
 was roaming over the world in search of renown. 
 
 Upon this idea of a venerable sage and most eminent states- 
 man, exceeding all others in political knowledge, native talents, 
 matchless industry, happy eloquence, tried integrity, disinter- 
 ested patriotism, unsullied morals, proud honor, and courage 
 of all kinds, is there not a congruity, a naturalness, and consis- 
 tency throughout the whole procedure of Junius towards the 
 king, and towards worse men ? Him he treats with constitu- 
 tional regard and respect, while he takes the dissecting scalpel to 
 others, whom, after exposing their morbid condition, he has pre- 
 served as so many dried preparations for the instruction of those 
 ministers and courtiers who shall come after them. No man 
 hitherto guessed to be Junius will bear our test. Weighed in 
 the balance, they have all been found wanting. During nearly 
 forty years I have scanned them all, after my first suspicion 
 that the celebrated eulogy on Lord Chatham in the fifty-fourth 
 letter of Junius was a se.pse portrait. This our opinion frees 
 us from innumerable difficulties which incumber every other hy- 
 pothesis, every one else marring the noble picture. Our hypoth- 
 esis would read well in poetry, look well upon canvass, and still 
 better in chaste history, provided the idea of a conscientious Re- 
 former be never, for a moment, lost sight of, and that of a malig- 
 nant satirist and cowardly assassin be put entirely out of the 
 question. The deep disease — the something rotten in the state of 
 Britain, called loudly for such a Hercules in politics ; and his 
 salutiferous deeds have been, and long will be, operative in 
 these United States, and are actually now operating good in 
 the best part of Europe. 
 
 It is a saying almost proverbial, that heavenly inspiration has 
 ceased in these latter days. I do not believe it. I believe 
 that the inspiration of the Almighty still giveth extraordinary 
 understanding : — nor can I ever believe that Columbus, Chat-
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 427 
 
 ham, and Napoleon gave to themselves those superior powers 
 of mind, which have effected, and are still effecting, mighty 
 changes in the affairs of men. — But I keep the reader too 
 long from the sight of a solid structure, which, like some of the 
 venerable temples of antiquity, would have been debased by 
 a profusion of ornament. 
 
 TO 
 
 the Printer of the Public Advertiser.* 
 
 " 19 December, 1769. 
 " When the complaints of a brave and powerful people are 
 observed to increase in proportion to the wrongs they have 
 suffered ; when, instead of sinking into submission, they are 
 roused to resistance ; the time will soon arrive, at which every 
 inferior consideration must yield to the security of the sove- 
 reign, and to the general safety of the state. There is a mo- 
 ment of difficulty and danger, at which flattery and falsehood 
 can no longer deceive, and simplicity itself can no longer be 
 misled. Let us suppose it arrived. Let us suppose a gra- 
 cious, well-intentioned Prince, made sensible at last of the 
 great duty he owes to his people, and of his own disgraceful 
 situation : that he looks round him for asistance ; and asks 
 for no advice, but how to gratify the wishes, and secure the 
 happiness of his subjects. In these circumstances, it may be 
 matter of curious speculation to consider, if an honest man 
 were permitted to approach a king, in what terms he would 
 address himself to his sovereign. Let it be imagined, no 
 matter how improbable, that the first prejudice against his 
 character is removed ; that the ceremonious difficulties of an 
 audience are surmounted ; that he feels himself animated by 
 the purest and most honorable affections to his King and coun- 
 try ; and that the great person whom he addresses has spirit 
 enough to bid him speak freely, and understanding enough to 
 listen to him with attention. Unacquainted with the vain irn- 
 
 * Letter XXXV.
 
 428 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 pertinence of forms, he would deliver his sentiments with dig- 
 nity and firmness, but not without respect." 
 
 " Sir, 
 
 " It is the misfortune of your life, and originally the cause of 
 every reproach and distress which has attended your govern- 
 ment, that you should never have been acquainted with the 
 language of truth, until you heard it in the complaints of your 
 people. It is not, however, too late to correct the error of 
 your education. We are still inclined to make an indulgent 
 allowance for the pernicious lessons you received in your 
 youth, and to form the most sanguine hopes from the natural 
 benevolence of your disposition.* We are far from thinking 
 you capable of a direct, deliberate purpose, to invade those 
 original rights of your subjects, on which all their civil and 
 political liberties depend. Had it been possible for us to en- 
 tertain a suspicion so dishonorable to your character, we should 
 
 " * The plan of tutelage and future dominion over the heir apparent, 
 laid many years ago at Carleton- Mouse, between the Princess Dowa- 
 ger and her favorite the Earl of Bute, was as gross and palpable, as 
 that which was concerted between Anne of Austria and Cardinal Ma- 
 zarin, to govern Lewis the Fourteenth, and in effect (o prolong his 
 minority until the end of their lives. That prince had strong natural 
 parts, and used frequently to blush for his own ignorance and want of 
 education, which had been wilfully neglected by his mother and her 
 minion. A little experience, however, soon showed him how shamefully 
 he had been treated, and for what infamous purposes he had been kept 
 in ignorance. Our great Edward, too, at an early period, had sense 
 enough to understand the nature of the connexion between his aban- 
 doned mother and the detested Mortimer. But, since that time, hu- 
 man nature, we may observe, is greatly altered for the better. Dowa- 
 gers may be chaste, and minions may be honest. When it was proposed 
 to settle the present king's household as Prince of Wales, it is well 
 known that the Earl of Bute was forced into it, in direct contradiction 
 to the late king's inclination. That was the salient point, from which 
 all the mischiefs and disgraces of the present reign took life and mo- 
 tion. From that moment, Lord Bute never suffered the Prince of 
 Wales to be an instant out of his sight We need not look farther."
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 429 
 
 long since have adopted a style of remonstrance very distant 
 from the humility of complaint. The doctrine inculcated by our 
 laws, that the King can do no wrong, is admitted without reluc- 
 tance. We separate the amiable, good-natured Prince, from 
 the folly and treachery of his servants ; and the private virtues 
 of the man, from the vices of his government. Were it not for 
 this just distinction, I know not whether your Majesty's condi- 
 tion, or that of the English nation, would deserve most to be 
 lamented. I would prepare your mind for a favorable recep- 
 tion of truth, by removing every painful, offensive idea, of 
 personal reproach. Your subjects, Sir, wish for nothing but 
 that, as they are reasonable and affectionate enough to sep- 
 arate your person from your government, so you, in your 
 turn, should distinguish between the conduct which becomes 
 the permanent dignity of a King, and that which serves 
 only to promote the temporary interest and miserable ambition 
 of a minister. 
 
 "You ascended the throne with a declared, and, I doubt 
 not, a sincere resolution, of giving universal satisfaction to your 
 subjects. You found them pleased with the novelty of a young 
 Prince, whose countenance promised even more than his words; 
 and loyal to you, not only from principle, but passion. It was 
 not a cold profession of allegiance to the first magistrate ; but 
 a partial, animated attachment, to a favorite Prince, the native 
 of their country. They did not wait to examine your conduct, 
 nor to be determined by experience ; but gave you a generous 
 credit for the future blessings of your reign, and paid you in 
 advance the clearest tribute of their affections. Such, Sir, was 
 once the disposition of a people, who now surround your 
 throne with reproaches and complaints. Do justice to your- 
 self. Banish from your mind those unworthy opinions, with 
 which some interested persons have labored to possess you. 
 Distrust the men, who tell you that the English are naturally 
 
 light and inconstant ; that they complain without a cause. 
 
 Withdraw your confidence equally from all parties ; from min-
 
 430 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 isters, favorites, and relations : and let there be one moment 
 in your life, in which you have consulted your own under- 
 standing. 
 
 " When you affectedly renounced the name of Englishman, 
 believe me, Sir, you were persuaded to pay a very ill-judged 
 compliment to one part of your subjects, at the expense of 
 another. While the natives of Scotland are not in actual re- 
 bellion, they are undoubtedly entitled to protection ; nor do I 
 mean to condemn the policy of giving some encouragement to 
 the novelty of their affections for the House of Hanover. I am 
 ready to hope for every thing from their new-born zeal, and 
 from the future steadiness of their allegiance. But, hitherto, 
 they have no claim to your favor. To honor them with a de- 
 termined predilection and confidence, in exclusion of your 
 English subjects, who placed your family, and in spite of 
 treachery and rebellion have supported it, upon the throne, 
 is a mistake too gross, even for the unsuspecting generosity of 
 youth. In this error, we see a capital violation of the most 
 obvious rules of policy and prudence. We trace it, however, 
 to an original bias in your education, and are ready to allow 
 for your inexperience. 
 
 " To the same early influence we attribute it, that you have 
 descended to take a share, not only in the narrow views and 
 interests of particular persons, but in the fatal malignity of their 
 passions. At your accession to the throne, the whole system 
 of government was altered j not from wisdom or deliberation, 
 but because it had been adopted by your predecessor. A little 
 personal motive of pique and resentment was sufficient to 
 remove the ablest servants of the Crown ; * but it is not in 
 this country, Sir, that such men can be dishonored by the 
 
 "* One of the first acts of the present reign was to dismiss Mr. 
 Legge, because he had, some years before, refused to yield his interest 
 in Hampshire to a Scotchman recommended by Lord Bute. This was 
 the reason publicly assigned by his Lordship."
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 431 
 
 frowns of a king. They were dismissed, but could not be 
 disgraced. Without entering into a minuter discussion of the 
 merits of the peace, we may ohserve, in the imprudent hurry 
 with which tiie first overtures from France were accepted, in 
 Mhe conduct of the negotiation and terms of the treaty, the 
 strongest marks of that precipitate spirit of concession with 
 which a certain part of your subjects have been at all times 
 ready to purchase a peace with the natural enemies of this 
 country. On your part, we are satisfied that every thing was 
 honorable and sincere ; and, if England was sold to France, 
 we doubt not that your Majesty was equally betrayed. The 
 conditions of the peace were matter of grief and surprise to 
 your subjects, but not the immediate cause of their present dis- 
 content. 
 
 " Hitherto, Sir, you had been sacrificed to the prejudices 
 and passions of others. With what firmness will you bear the 
 mention of your own ? 
 
 " A man, not very honorably distinguished in the world, com- 
 mences an attack upon your favorite ; considering nothing, but 
 how he might best expose his person and principles to detesta- 
 tion, and the national character of his countrymen to contempt. 
 The natives of that country, Sir, are as much distinguished by 
 a peculiar character, as by your majesty's favor. Like ano- 
 ther chosen people, they have been conducted into the land of 
 plenty, where they find themselves effectually marked, and di- 
 vided from mankind. There is hardly a period at which the 
 most irregular character may not be redeemed. The mistakes 
 of one sex find a retreat in patriotism ; those of the other, in 
 devotion. Mr. Wilkes brought with him into politics, the same 
 liberal sentiments by which his private conduct had been di- 
 rected ; and seemed to think that, as there are few excesses in 
 which an English gentleman may not be permitted to indulge, the 
 same latitude was allowed him in the choice of his political prin- 
 ciples, and in the spirit of maintaining them I mean to state,
 
 432 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 not entirely to defend, his conduct. In the earnestness of his 
 zeal, he suffered some unwarrantable insinuations to escape 
 him. He said more than moderate men would justify ; but 
 not enough to entitle him to the honor of your Majesty's per- 
 sona] resentment. The rays of royal indignation, collected 
 upon him, served only to illuminate, and could not consume. 
 Animated by the favor of the people on one side, and heated 
 by persecution on the other, his views and sentiments changed 
 with his situation. Hardly serious at first, he is now an en- 
 thusiast. The coldest bodies warm with opposition, the hard- 
 est sparkle in collision. There is a holy mistaken zeal in 
 politics as well as religion. By persuading others, we convince 
 ourselves. The passions are engaged, and create a maternal 
 affection in the mind, which forces us to love the cause for 
 which we suffer. ...Is this a contention worthy of a king ? Are 
 you not sensible how much the meanness of the cause gives 
 an air of ridicule to the serious difficulties into which you have 
 been betrayed ? The destruction of one man has been now, 
 for many years, the sole object of your government ; and, if 
 there can be any thing still more disgraceful, we have seen, for 
 such an object, the utmost influence of the executive power, 
 and every ministerial artifice, exerted without success. Nor 
 can you ever succeed, unless he should be imprudent enough 
 to forfeit the protection of those laws to which you owe your 
 crown, or unless your ministers should persuade you to make 
 it a question of force alone, and try the whole strength of gov- 
 ernment in opposition to the people. The lessons he has re- 
 ceived from experience, will probably guard him from such 
 excess of folly ; and, in your Majesty's virtues, we find an 
 unquestionable assurance, that no illegal violence will be at- 
 tempted. 
 
 " Far from suspecting you of so horrible a design, we would 
 attribute the continued violation of the laws, and even this last 
 enormous attack upon the vital principles of the constitution, 
 to an ill-advised, unworthy, personal resentment. From one
 
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 433 
 
 false step you have been betrayed into another ; and, as the 
 cause was unworthy of you, your ministers were determined 
 that the prudence of the execution should correspond with the 
 wisdom and dignity of the design. They have reduced you to 
 the necessity of choosing out of a variety of difficulties ;....to 
 a situation so unhappy, that you can neither do wrong without 
 ruin, nor right without affliction. These worthy servants have 
 undoubtedly given you many singular proofs of their abilities. 
 Not contented with making Mr. Wilkes a man of importance, 
 they have judiciously transferred the question, from the rights 
 and interests of one man, to the most important rights and 
 interests of the people ; and forced your subjects, from wishing 
 well to the cause of an individual, to unite with him in their 
 own. Let them proceed as they have begun, and your majesty 
 need not doubt that the catastrophe will do a dishonor to the 
 conduct of the piece. 
 
 " The circumstances to which you are reduced will not ad- 
 mit of a compromise with the English nation. Undecisive, 
 qualifying measures, will disgrace your government still more 
 than open violence ; and, without satisfying the people, will 
 excite their contempt. They have too much understanding 
 and spirit to accept of an indirect satisfaction for a direct injury. 
 Nothing less than a repeal, as formal as the resolution itself, 
 can heal the wound that has been given to the constitution, nor 
 will any thing less be accepted. I can readily believe, that 
 there is an influence sufficient to recall their pernicious vote. 
 The House of Commons undoubtedly consider their duty to 
 the crown as paramount to all other obligations. To us they 
 are only indebted for an accidental existence, and have justly 
 transferred their gratitude from their parents to their benefac- 
 tors from those who gave them birth, to the minister from 
 
 whose benevolence they derive the comforts and pleasures of 
 their political life.... who has taken the tenderest care of their 
 infancy, and relieves their necessities without offending their 
 
 delicacy. But, if it were possible for their integrity to be de- 
 
 55
 
 434 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 graded to a condition so vile and abject, that, compared with 
 it, the present estimation they stand in is a state of honor and 
 respect, consider, Sir, in what manner you will afterwards 
 proceed. Can you conceive that the people of this country 
 will long submit to be governed by so flexible a House of 
 Commons ? It is not in the nature of human society, that any 
 form of government, in such circumstances, can long be pre- 
 served. In ours, the general contempt of the people is as 
 fatal as their detestation. Such, I am persuaded, would be 
 the necessary effect of any base concession made by the pres- 
 ent House of Commons ; and, as a qualifying measure would 
 not be accepted, it remains for you to decide, whether you 
 will, at any hazard, support a set of men who have reduced 
 you to this unhappy dilemma, or whether you will gratify the 
 united wishes of the whole people of England by dissolving 
 the parliament. 
 
 " Taking it for granted, as I do very sincerely, that you 
 have personally no design against the constitution, nor any 
 view inconsistent with the good of your subjects, I think you 
 cannot hesitate long upon the choice which it equally concerns 
 your interest and your honor to adopt. On one side, you haz- 
 ard the affections of all your English subjects ; you relinquish 
 every hope of repose to yourself, and you endanger the estab- 
 lishment of your family for ever. All this you venture for no 
 object whatsoever, or for such an object as it would be an af- 
 front to you to name. Men of sense will examine your con- 
 duct with suspicion ; while those who are incapable of com- 
 prehending to what degree they are injured, afflict you with 
 clamors equally insolent and unmeaning. Supposing it possible 
 that no fatal struggle should ensue, you determine at once to 
 be unhappy, without the hope of a compensation either from 
 interest or ambition. If an English king be hated or despised, 
 he must be unhappy ; and this, perhaps, is the only political 
 truth which he ought to be convinced of without experiment. 
 But, if the English people should no longer confine their re-
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 435 
 
 sentment to a submissive representation of their wrongs ; if, 
 following the glorious example of their ancestors, they should 
 no longer appeal to the creature of the constitution, but to that 
 high Being who gave them the rights of humanity, whose gifts 
 it were sacrilege to surrender, let me ask you, Sir, upon what 
 part of your subjects would you rely for assistance ? 
 
 " The people of Ireland have been uniformly plundered and 
 oppressed. In return, they give you every day fresh marks 
 of their resentment. They despise the miserable governor 
 you have sent them,* because he is the creature of Lord Bute ; 
 nor is it from any natural confusion in their ideas, that they are 
 so ready to confound the original of a king with the disgraceful 
 representation of him. 
 
 " The distance of the Colonies would make it impossible for 
 them to take an active concern in your affairs, if they were as 
 well affected to your government as they once pretended to be 
 to your person. They were ready enough to distinguish be- 
 tween you and your ministers. They complained of an act of 
 the Legislature, but traced the origin of it no higher than to 
 the servants of the crown : they pleased themselves with the 
 hope that their sovereign, if not favorable to their cause, at 
 least was impartial. The decisive personal part you took 
 against them, has effectually banished that first distinction from 
 their minds. f They consider you as united with your servants 
 
 " * Viscount Townshend, sent over on the plan of being resident 
 Governor. The history of his ridiculous administration shall not be 
 lost to the public." 
 
 " f In the king's speech of 8 November 1768, it was declared, ' That 
 the spirit of faction had broken out afresh in some of the Colonies ; 
 and, in one of them, proceeded to acts of violence and resistance to 
 the execution of the laws ; that Boston was in a state of disobedi- 
 ence to all law and government, and had proceeded to measures sub- 
 versive of the constitution, and attended with circumstances that 
 manifested a disposition to throw off their dependence 1 on Great 
 Britain.' "
 
 436 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 against America ; and know how to distinguish the sove- 
 reign and a venal parliament on one side, from the real 
 sentiments of the English people on the other. Looking for- 
 ward to independence, they might possihly receive you for 
 their king ; but if ever you retire to America, be assured they 
 will give you such a covenant to digest, as the Presbytery of 
 Scotland would have been ashamed to offer to Charles the 
 Second. They left their native land in search of freedom, 
 and found it in a desert. Divided as they are into a thousand 
 forms of policy and religion, there is one point in which they 
 
 all agree : they equally detest the pageantry of a king, and 
 
 the supercilious hypocrisy of a bishop. 
 
 " It is not, then, from the alienated affections of Ireland or 
 America, that you can reasonably look for assistance ; still less 
 from the people of England, who are actually contending for 
 their rights, and in this great question, are parties against you. 
 You are not, however, destitute of every appearance of sup- 
 port : You have all the Jacobites, Nonjurors, Roman Catho- 
 lics, and Tories, of this country ; and all Scotland, without 
 exception. Considering from what family you are descended, 
 the choice of your friends has been singularly directed ; and 
 truly, Sir, if you had not lost the Whig interest of England, I 
 should admire your dexterity in turning the hearts of your en- 
 emies. Is it possible for you to place any confidence in men 
 who, before they are faithful to you, must renounce every 
 opinion, and betray every principle, both in church and state, 
 which they inherit from their ancestors, and are confirmed in 
 by their education ? whose numbers are so inconsiderable, that 
 they have long since been obliged to give up the principles and 
 language which distinguish them as a party, and to fight under 
 the banners of their enemies ? Their zeal begins with hypoc- 
 risy, and must conclude in treachery. At first they deceive ; 
 at last they betray.
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 437 
 
 " As to the Scotch, I must suppose your heart and under- 
 standing so biassed from your earliest infancy, in their favor, 
 that nothing less than your oivn misfortunes can undeceive you. 
 You will not accept of the uniform experience of your ances- 
 tors, and, when once a man is determined to believe, the very 
 absurdity of the doctrine confirms him in his faith. A bigotted 
 understanding can draw a proof of attachment to the house of 
 Hanover, from a notorious zeal for the house of Stuart, and 
 find an earnest of future loyalty in former rebellions. Appear- 
 ances are, however, in their favor : so strongly, indeed, that 
 one would think they had forgotten that you are their lawful 
 king, and had mistaken you for a pretender to the crown. Let 
 it be admitted, then, that the Scotch are as sincere s in their 
 present professions, as if you were, in reality, not an English- 
 man, but a Briton of the North. You would not be the first 
 prince, of their native country, against whom they have rebel- 
 led, nor the first whom they have basely betrayed. Have you 
 forgotten, Sir, or has your favorite concealed from you that 
 part of our history, when the unhappy Charles (and he too had 
 private virtues) fled from the open, avowed indignation of his 
 English subjects, and surrendered himself at discretion to the 
 good faith of his own countrymen ? Without looking for sup- 
 port in their affections as subjects, he applied only to their 
 honor as gentlemen, for protection. They received him as 
 they would your Majesty, with bows, and smiles, and falsehood, 
 and kept him until they had settled their bargain with the 
 English parliament ; then basely sold their native king to the 
 vengeance of his enemies. This, Sir, was not the act of a few 
 traitors, but the deliberate treachery of a Scotch parliament, 
 representing the nation. A wise prince might draw from it 
 two lessons of equal utility to himself. On one side, he might 
 learn to dread the undisguised resentment of a generous peo- 
 ple, who dare openly assert their rights, and who, in a just 
 cause, are ready to meet their sovereign in the field. On the 
 other side, he would be taught to apprehend something far more
 
 
 438 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 formidable; a fawning treachery, against which no prudence 
 
 can guard, no courage can defend. The insidious smile upon 
 the cheek, would warn him of the canker in the heart. 
 
 " From the uses to which one part of the army has been too 
 frequently applied, you have some reason to expect that there 
 are no services they would refuse. Here, too, we trace the 
 partiality of your understanding. You take the sense of the 
 army from the conduct of the guards, with the same justice 
 with which you collect the sense of the people from the repre- 
 sentations of the ministry. Your marching regiments, Sir, will 
 not make the guards their example, either as soldiers or sub- 
 jects. They feel, and resent, as they ought to do, that invaria- 
 ble, undistinguishing favor, with which the guards are treated ; * 
 while those gallant troops, by whom every hazardous, every 
 laborious service is performed, are left to perish in garrisons 
 abroad, or pine in quarters at home, neglected and forgotten. 
 If they had no sense of the great original duty they owe their 
 country, their resentment would operate like patriotism, and 
 leave your cause to be defended by those to whom you have 
 lavished the rewards and honors of their profession. The 
 Praetorian Bands, enervated and debauched as they were, had 
 still strength enough to awe the Roman populace ; but when 
 the distant legions took the alarm, they marched to Rome, and 
 gave away the empire. 
 
 " * The number of commissioned officers in the guards are to the 
 marching regiments as one to eleven ;..... the number of regiments 
 given to the guards, compared with those given to the line, is about 
 three to one, at a moderate computation : consequently, the partiality 
 in favor of the guards is as thirty-three to one So much for the offi- 
 cers The private men have four-pence ' a day to subsist on ; and five 
 
 hundred lashes, if they deseit. Under this punishment they frequently 
 expire. With these encouragements, it is supposed they may be de- 
 pended upon, whenever a certain person thinks it necessary to butcher 
 his fellow-subjects."
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 439 
 
 " On this side, then, which ever way you turn your eyes, 
 you see nothing but perplexity and distress. You may deter- 
 mine to support the very ministry who have reduced your af- 
 fairs to this deplorable situation : you may shelter yourself under 
 the forms of a parliament, and set your people at defiance. But 
 be assured, Sir, that such a resolution would be as imprudent 
 as it would be odious. If it did not immediately shake your 
 establishment, it would rob you of your peace of mind for ever. 
 
 " On the other, how different is the prospect ! How easy, 
 how safe and honorable, is the path before you ! The English 
 nation declare they are grossly injured by their representatives, 
 and solicit your majesty to exert your lawful prerogative, and 
 give them an opportunity of recalling a trust which they find 
 has been scandalously abused. You are not to be told, that 
 the power of the House of Commons is not original, but dele- 
 gated to them for the welfare of the people from whom they 
 received it. A question of right arises between the constituent 
 and the representative body. By what authority shall it be 
 decided ? Will your majesty interfere in a question in which 
 you have properly no immediate concern ? It would be a step 
 equally odious and unnecessary. Shall the Lords be called 
 upon to determine the rights and privileges of the Commons ? 
 They cannot do it, without a flagrant breach of the constitution. 
 Or, will you refer it to the judges ? They have often told your 
 ancestors, that the law of parliament is above them. What 
 party then remains, but to leave it to the people to determine 
 for themselves ? They alone are injured ; and, since there is 
 no superior power to which the cause can be referred, they 
 alone ought to determine. 
 
 " I do not mean to perplex you with a tedious argument 
 upon a subject already so discussed that inspiration could hardly 
 throw a new light upon it. There are, however, two points of 
 view, in which it particularly imports your majesty to consider 
 the late proceedings of the House of Commons. By depriving
 
 440 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 a subject of his birth-right, they have attributed to their own 
 vote an authority equal to an act of the whole legislature ; and, 
 though perhaps not with the same motives, have strictly follow- 
 ed the example of the Long Parliament, which first declared 
 the regal office useless, and soon after, with as little ceremony, 
 dissolved the House of Lords. The same pretended power 
 which robs an English subject of his birth-right, may rob an 
 English king of his crown. In another view, the resolution of 
 the House of Commons, apparently not so dangerous to your 
 majesty, is still more alarming to your people. Not contented 
 with divesting one man of his right, they have arbitrarily con- 
 veyed that right to another. They have set aside a return as 
 illegal, without daring to censure those officers who were par- 
 ticularly apprized of Mr. Wilkes's incapacity, not only by the 
 declaration of the House, but expressly by the writ directed 
 to them, and who nevertheless returned him as duly elected. 
 They have rejected the majority of votes, the only criterion by 
 which our laws judge of the sense of the people ; they have 
 transferred the right of election from the collective to the re- 
 presentative body ; and by these acts, taken separately or to- 
 gether, they have essentially altered the original constitution of 
 the House of Commons. Versed, as your majesty undoubt- 
 edly is, in the English history, it cannot easily escape you, how 
 much it is your interest, as well as your duty, to prevent one 
 of the three estates from encroaching upon the province of the 
 other two, or assuming the authority of them all. When once 
 they have departed from the great constitutional line by which 
 all their proceedings should be directed, who will answer for 
 their future moderation ? Or what assurance will they give 
 you, that, when they have trampled upon their equals, they 
 will submit to a superior ? Your majesty may learn, hereafter, 
 how nearly the slave and tyrant are allied. 
 
 " Some of your council, more candid than the rest, admit 
 the abandoned profligacy of the present House of Commons, 
 but oppose their dissolution, upon an opinion, I confess, not
 
 JUNIUS TO THE KING. 44 A 
 
 very unwarrantable, that their successors would be equally at 
 the disposal of the treasury. I cannot persuade myself that 
 the nation will have profited so little by experience. But, if 
 that opinion were well founded, you might then gratify our 
 wishes at an easy rate, and appease the present clamors against 
 your government, without offering any material injury to the 
 favorite cause of corruption. 
 
 " You have still an honorable part to act. The affections of 
 your subjects may yet be recovered. But before you subdue 
 their hearts, you must gain a noble victory over your own. 
 Discard those little, personal resentments, which have too long 
 directed your public conduct. Pardon this man the remainder 
 of his punishment ; and, if resentment still prevails, make it, 
 what it should have been long since, an act, not of mercy, but 
 of contempt. He will soon fall back into his natural station.... 
 a silent senator, and hardly supporting the weekly eloquence 
 of a newspaper. The gentle breath of peace would leave him 
 on the surface, neglected and unremoved. It is only the tem- 
 pest that lifts him from his place. 
 
 " Without consulting your minister, call together your whole 
 council. Let it appear to the public, that you can determine 
 and act for yourself. Come forward to your people. Lay 
 aside the wretched formalities of a king, and speak to your 
 subjects with the spirit of a man, and in the language of a gen- 
 tleman. Tell them you have been fatally deceived. The ac- 
 knowledgement will be no disgrace, but rather an honor, to 
 your understanding. Tell them you are determined to remove 
 every cause of complaint against your government ; that you 
 will give your confidence to no man who does not possess the 
 confidence of your subjects ; and leave it to themselves to de- 
 termine, by their conduct at a future election, whether or no it 
 be, in reality, the general sense of the nation, that their rights 
 have been arbitrarily invaded by the present House of Com- 
 
 56
 
 442 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 mons, and the constitution betrayed. They will then do justice 
 to their representatives and to themselves. 
 
 " These sentiments, Sir, and the style they are conveyed in, 
 may be offensive, perhaps, because they are new to you. Ac- 
 customed to the language of courtiers, you measure their af- 
 fections by the vehemence of their expressions ; and when 
 they praise you indirectly, you admire their sincerity. But 
 this is not a time to trifle with your fortune. They deceive 
 you, Sir, who tell you that you have many friends whose affec- 
 tions are founded upon a principle of personal attachment. 
 The first foundation of friendship is not the power of confer- 
 ring benefits, but the equality with which they are received, 
 and may be returned. The fortune which made you a king, 
 forbade you to have a friend. It is a law of nature, which 
 cannot be violated with impunity. The mistaken prince, who 
 looks for friendship, will find a favorite, and in that favorite the 
 ruin of his affairs. 
 
 " The people of England are loyal to the house of Hanover, 
 not from a vain preference of one family to another, but from 
 a conviction that the establishment of that family was necessary 
 to the support of their civil and religious liberties. This, Sir, 
 is the principle of allegiance equally solid and rational 5 — fit for 
 Englishmen to adopt, and well worthy of your Majesty's en- 
 couragement. We cannot long be deluded by nominal distinc- 
 tions. The name of Stuart, of itself, is only contemptible ;.... 
 armed with the sovereign authority, their principles are formi- 
 dable. The prince, who imitates their conduct, should be 
 warned by their example ; and, while he plumes himself upon 
 the security of his title to the crown, should remember that, 
 as it was acquired by one revolution, it may be lost by another. 
 
 " JUNIUS."
 
 LORD SHELBURNE REPINES AT INDEPENDENCY. 443 
 
 This address appears to us, at this distance of time and 
 space, remarkably dignified, benevolent, respectful, and preg- 
 nant with wisdom. Had it been communicated privately, a 
 prudent king, situated and circumstanced like George the 
 Third, would have sought the wise man out and listened to his 
 advice ; like Pharaoh, who finding Joseph more wise and 
 holy than any around him, hastened to place him at the head 
 of his affairs. 
 
 Whatever had been said of inflexibility of character in 
 the King, the public saw little or nothing of it after the 
 provisional articles of peace with America were signed. He 
 said to his parliament in December. 1782 — "That he had 
 lost no time in giving the necessary orders for prohibiting of- 
 fensive operations against America, and had been directing his 
 views to a cordial reconciliation with the Americans. Such 
 being his own inclination, and such the sense of his parliament 
 and people, he had not hesitated to conclude with them pro- 
 visional articles of peace, by which they were acknowledged 
 free and independent states. He deplored this dismemberment 
 of the empire, which had become a matter both of policy and 
 prudence ; but testified a hope that religion, language, interest, 
 and affection, would yet prove a permanent tie of union be- 
 tween the two countries." 
 
 Lord Shelburne, who made the peace, declared that he had 
 exerted every effort to preserve America to Britain ; that he 
 had not voluntarily yielded up this independency, but merely 
 submitted to the controlling power of necessity and fate; and 
 added — " It was not I that made this cession. It was the evil 
 star of Britain. It was the blunders of a former administra- 
 tion. It was the power of revolted subjects, and the mighty 
 arms of the house of Bourbon." In this, Earl Shelburne 
 felt like Chatham. After the peace with America, George the 
 Third found himself surrounded by Whigs, with the son of Lord 
 Chatham for prime minister, and the principles of Junius 
 triumphant !
 
 444 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 One parting glance at America ! General Washington made 
 his public entry into the cit}^ of New York in 1782, amid the 
 acclamations of his grateful countrymen. He then repaired 
 to Congress, and on a clay appointed for that ceremony, he, 
 addressing the President, " asked leave to surrender into their 
 hands the trust committed to him, and, having finished the 
 work assigned him, to retire from the great theatre of action to 
 the tranquil scenes of private life ; earnestly recommending to 
 the protection of Almighty God the interests of his dear 
 country, and those who had the superintendence of them to 
 his holy keeping." 
 
 The President replied — " The United States in Congress 
 assembled, receive with emotions too affecting for utterance the 
 solemn resignation of the authority under which you have led 
 our troops ivith success through a perilous and doubtful war. 
 Called upon by your country to defend its invaded rights, you 
 accepted the sacred charge before it had formed alliances, and 
 whilst it was without friends or a government to support you. — 
 You have conducted the great military contest with wisdom and 
 fortitude, invariably regarding the rights of the civil power 
 through all disasters and changes ; — you have, by the love and 
 confidence of your fellow-citizens, enabled them to display their 
 martial genius, and transmit their fame to posterity. Having 
 defended the standard of liberty in this new world, having 
 taught a lesson useful to those ivho inflict, and to those tvho 
 feel oppression, you retire with the blessings of your country ; 
 but the glory of your virtues will not terminate with your mil- 
 itary command, it will continue to animate remotest ages. 
 
 " May the Almighty foster a life so beloved, with his pecu- 
 liar care, and may your future days be as happy as your past 
 have been illustrious." * 
 
 * Mr. Belsham, who is freer from mistakes respecting American 
 matters than any other British historian, Gordon excepted, speaking 
 of the sad fate of Major Andre, a young British officer every way unfit 
 for a spy, says— that the high character of the American commander 
 would have derived additional lustre from indulging the earnest and
 
 JOHN ADAMS'S FIRST AUDIENCE WITH THE KING. 445 
 
 In June, seventeen hundred and eighty-five, John Adams, the 
 first minister plenipotentiary from the United States to the 
 court of London, had his introductory audience with King 
 George the Third. An event so extraordinary with circum- 
 stances so novel to us in America, led Mr. Adams to narrate 
 the particulars, in a letter to an intimate friend ; which 
 was kept private till after the death of that good man. It was 
 thus ; 
 
 " At one o'clock on Wednesday, 1st of June, the master of 
 ceremonies called at my house, and went with me to the Sec- 
 retary of State's office in Cleaveland-row, where the Marquis 
 of Carmarthen received me, and introduced me to Mr. Frazier, 
 his under Secretary, who had heen, as his Lordship said, un- 
 interruptedly in that office, through all the changes in adminis- 
 tration for thirty years, having first been appointed by the Earl 
 of Holderness. 
 
 " After a short conversation upon the subject of importing 
 my effects from Holland, which Mr. Frazier himself introduc- 
 
 sole request of Major Andre to die as a soldier, not as a felon. The 
 fact was (I had it from several officers of rank and high character), 
 Washington would not venture to risk the indulgence, and merged 
 his personal feelings in necessity. The British had hung three or four 
 American officers as spies with no regard to their feelings as gentle- 
 men. When it was whispered in camp that Andre would be shot, there 
 was a general expression of discontent, progressing to clamor. The offi- 
 cers said — ' What ! — shall we risk our lives, as several of us have done, 
 and some be taken and hanged like dogs, and shall a detected British 
 spy meet a milder fate ? ' Alarming resignations would have been the 
 consequence. 
 
 That celebrated fault-finder Horace Walpole relates an anecdote of 
 Washington when a young officer, at the time of Braddook's defeat in 
 1754 ; whom he states to have said that the whistling of balls ivas grateful 
 music to his ears; and applies to him the epithet of braggart. Such an 
 idle story was told in this country, which induced the Rev. Dr. Gordon 
 the historian, to ask the truth of it from the General himself, who re- 
 plied — "I do not recollect having ever said any thing like it ; but if I 
 did, T must have been very young indeed." \ had this from Gordon 
 himself.
 
 446 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 ed, Lord Carmarthen invited me to go with him in his coach 
 to court. When we arrived in the ante-chambers, the master 
 of ceremonies introduced me, and attended me while the Sec- 
 retary of State went to take the commands of the king. While 
 I stood in this place, where it seems all ministers stand upon 
 such occasions, always attended by the master of ceremonies, 
 the room was very full of ministers of state, bishops, and all 
 other sorts of courtiers, as well as the next room, which is the 
 king's bed-chamber. You may well suppose I was the focus 
 of all eyes. I was relieved, however, from the embarrassment 
 of it, by the Swedish and Dutch ministers, who came to me 
 and entertained me with a very agreeable conversation during 
 the whole time. Some other gentlemen whom I had seen be- 
 fore, came to make their compliments too, until the Marquis of 
 Carmarthen returned, and desired me to go with him to his 
 Majesty. I went with his lordship through the levee-room into 
 the king's closet. The door was shut, and I was left with 
 his Majesty and the Secretary of State alone. I made the 
 three reverences ; one at the door, another about half way, 
 and the third before the presence — according to the usage es- 
 tablished at this, and all the northern courts of Europe ; — and 
 then I addressed myself to his Majesty in the following 
 words ; 
 
 " ' Sire — The United States have appointed me Minister 
 Plenipotentiary to your Majesty ; and have directed me to de- 
 liver to your Majesty this letter, which contains the evidence of 
 it. It is in obedience to their express commands, that I have 
 the honor to assure your Majesty of their unanimous disposi- 
 tion and desire to cultivate the most friendly and liberal inter- 
 course between your Majesty'' s subjects and their citizens, and 
 of their best wishes for your Majesty' 's health and happiness, and 
 for that of your f ami y. 
 
 " ' The appointment of a minister from, the United States to 
 your Majesty's court will form an epoch in the history of Eng- 
 land and America. I think myself more fortunate than all 
 my fellow-citizens, in having the distinguished honor to be the
 
 MR. ADAMS'S ADDRESS, AND THE KING'S REPLY. 447 
 
 first to stand in youfMajcsty's royal presence in a diplomatic 
 character ; and I shall esteem myself the happiest of men if I 
 can be instrumental in recommending my country more and 
 more to your Majesty's royal benevolence, and of restoring an 
 entire esteem, confidence, and affection : or, in better words, " the 
 old good nature and the good old humor" between people, who, 
 though separated by an ocean, and under different governments, 
 have the same language, a similar religion, a kindred blood. I beg 
 your Majesty's permission to add, that although 1 have sometimes 
 before been instructed by my country, it was never in my ivhole life 
 in a manner so agreeable to myself.'' 
 
 " The King listened to every word I said, with dignity it is 
 true, but with apparent emotion. Whether it was my visible 
 agitation, for I felt more than I could express, that touched 
 him, I cannot say ; but he was much affected, and answered 
 me with more tremor than I had spoken with — and said, — 
 
 " ' Sir — The circumstances of this audience are so extraordina- 
 ry, the language you have now held is so extremely proper, and 
 the feelings you have discovered so justly adapted to the occasion, 
 that I must say, that 1 not only receive with pleasure the assurance 
 of the friendly disposition of the United States, but that I am 
 glad the choice has fallen upon you to be their minister. 1 ivish 
 you, Sir, to believe, and that it may be understood in America, 
 that 1 have done nothing in the late contest but what 1 thought 
 myself indispensably bound to do, by the duty .which 1 owed to my 
 people. 1 ivill be frank with you. 1 was the last to conform to 
 the separation ; but the separation having been made, and having 
 become inevitable, I have always said as 1 now say, that I would 
 be the first to meet the friendship of the United States as an 
 independent power. The moment I see such sentiments and lan- 
 o-nao-e as yours prevail, and a disposition to give this country the 
 preference, that moment I shall say — Let the circumstances of 
 language, religion, and blood, have their natural and full 
 
 effect.' 
 
 " I dare not say that these were the king's precise words : 
 and it is even possible that I may have, in some particulars,
 
 448 CONCERNING JUNIUS AND HIS LETTERS. 
 
 mistaken his meaning ; for although his pronunciation is as dis- 
 tinct as I ever heard, he hesitated sometimes between members 
 of the same period. He was, indeed, much affected, and I 
 was not less so, and therefore I cannot be certain that I was so 
 attentive, heard so clearly, and understood so perfectly, as to 
 be confident of all his words, or sense ; and think that all 
 which he said to me should, at present, be kept secret in 
 America, except his Majesty, or his Secretary of State should 
 judge proper to report it. — This I do say, that the foregoing is 
 his Majesty's meaning, as I then understood it, and his own 
 words, as nearly as I can recollect them. 
 
 " The king then asked me whether I came last from France; 
 and upon my answering in the affirmative, he put on an air of 
 familiarity, and smiling, or rather laughing, said, ' There is an 
 opinion among some people that you are not the most attach- 
 ed of all your countrymen to the manners of France.' I was 
 surprised at this, because I thought it an indiscretion, and a de- 
 scent from his dignity. I was a little embarrassed, but deter- 
 mined not to deny the truth on the one hand, nor lead him to 
 infer from it any attachment to England on the other. — I threw 
 off as much gravity as I could, and assumed an air of gayety, 
 and a tone of decision, as far as was decent, and said, ' That 
 opinion, Sir, is not mistaken. I must avow to your Majesty, I 
 have no attachment but to my own country.' The king re- 
 plied as quick as lightning, ' An honest man will never have 
 any other. ,' 
 
 " The king then said a word or two to the Secretary of 
 State, which being between them, I did not hear ; and then 
 turned round, and bowed to me, as is customary with all kings 
 and princes, when they give the signal to retire. I retreated, 
 stepping backwards, as is the etiquette ; and making my last 
 reverence at the door of the chamber, I went away. The 
 master of the ceremonies joined me the moment of my coming 
 out of the king's closet, and accompanied me through all the 
 apartments down to my carriage."
 
 CONCLUSION. 449 
 
 And thus ended the great question between Great Britain 
 and the North American Colonies after an eight years' war, to 
 the entire satisfaction of the people of these United States. 
 
 In one point of view it cannot be called a revolution, 
 seeing our state governments have proceeded with little varia- 
 tion, as before, through all their legislative, judiciary, and ex- 
 ecutive forms from the governor to the constable, while the gen- 
 eral, national, or federative government approaches in several 
 points to that of a very limited monarchy, the President being 
 to all intents and purposes a King for the circumscribed period 
 of four years. 
 
 In another view, our separation from Britain was a great 
 revolution. It changed our sentiments for more correct opin- 
 ions of British bravery, British humanity, and of the know- 
 ledge possessed by Kings, privy-counsellors, lords and com- 
 mons. On the other hand, the struggle led to new and more 
 correct opinions of France and Frenchmen, and gave us a new, 
 powerful, and efficient friend in a nation we had heretofore 
 been taught to believe our natural enemy, dangerous, at once, 
 to our temporal and spiritual interest. It gave us a better 
 opinion of ourselves. And while we acquired a confidence 
 in our own strength, we felt a pride of country from the 
 success of our arguments and arms, and the character of the 
 man who enabled his fellow-citizens to display their martial 
 genius, and transmit their fame to posterity. May we feel 
 a pride still more noble, an intellectual pride, in the Constitu- 
 tion of our confederated government, which we believe to be 
 one of the noblest works of man, and the glory of the human 
 understanding ! 
 
 THE END. 
 
 57
 
 
 5 o? 
 
 1 
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 Santa Barbara 
 
 THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW. 
 
 Series 9482
 
 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 AA 000 238 614 2