c*- 
 
 
 
 LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. 
 
 < V T 1 ^ L OR 
 
 ~J2 
 
 Received _^*feX , f*£ 
 
 
 Accessions No. ^7^ c ^ Shelf No: 
 
 -i 
 
#, 
 
9>v^^i^X^^r Q&Zr- /t 
 
 THE 
 
 GOSPEL OF THE RESURRECTION. 
 
(Eambtfoge: 
 
 PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. 
 AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
THE 
 
 GOSPEL OF THE RESURRECTION: 
 
 THOUGHTS ON ITS RELATION TO 
 REASON AND HISTORY. 
 
 BROOKE FOSS WESTCOTT, B.D. 
 it 
 
 FORMERLY FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. , 
 
 Ronton antr ©ambrfoge: 
 MACMILLAN AND CO. 
 
 1 866. 
 
\AJ -f 
 
 EyAorcoc 6 AiA<\ck<\Aoc hmcon e'AereN. 
 TINEI0E TPAnEZITAI AOKIMOI. 
 
w 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 'EaN OMOAOpHCHC €N TtO CTOMATl' COY KypiOM 'Ih- 
 COfN KAI niCTCyCHC €N TH KApAlA COY OTI 6 960C 
 AYTON HreipeN 6K NeKpCON, CCO0HCH. 
 
 HHHE present Essay is an endeavour to consider 
 ■*■ some of the elementary truths of Christianity 
 as a miraculous Revelation from the side of His- 
 tory and Reason. There seems to be a growing 
 impression, for it is too vague to be called a belief, 
 that such a fact as the Resurrection cannot be 
 brought into harmony with what we see of the 
 life of the world or what we feel of the laws of 
 individual thought. The opponents of Christi- 
 anity tacitly assume that a miracle must be ex- 
 plained away ; and its defenders neglect to notice 
 the manifold lines of culture and thought which 
 converge towards the central lessons of the Gos- 
 pel and again start from them with the promise 
 of richer fruitfulness. If the arguments which t 
 
vi Preface. 
 
 are here adduced are valid they will go far to 
 prove that the Resurrection, with all that it in- 
 cludes, is the key to the history of man, and the 
 complement of reason. At least they will shew 
 that the supposed incompatibility of a devout be- 
 lief in the Life of Christ with a broad view of tne 
 course of human progress and a frank trust in the 
 laws of our own minds, is wholly imaginary. In- 
 deed it is not too much to assert that the fact of 
 the Resurrection (as the typical miracle of the 
 Gospel) becomes more natural as we take a more 
 comprehensive view of history, and more harmo- 
 nious with reason as we interrogate our instincts 
 more closely. A conviction of the certainty of the 
 facts of the Gospel seems to be best gained either 
 by the most general or by the most personal view 
 of their import. They fill up the most critical 
 place in the great record of the progress of man- 
 kind ; and they satisfy wants which each man feels 
 for himself. Christianity has many sides ; and 
 those are by no means the least noble which are 
 thus opened to the student of life and thought. 
 
 The object which I proposed to myself neces- 
 sarily involved a mode of treatment wholly un- 
 
Preface. vii 
 
 theological. Many topics consequently are dealt 
 with otherwise than they would be dealt with in 
 1 a doctrinal exposition ; and many are wholly omit- 
 ted which would have found a place in such a work. 
 But while I have endeavoured to avoid technical 
 language, I trust that no word in the Essay will 
 be found at variance with the fulness of Catholic 
 truth. 
 
 He who has long pondered over a train of rea- 
 soning becomes unable to detect its weak points. 
 It is so, I am conscious, with what I now offer to 
 the criticism of others. But the only desire which 
 he can have who writes on such a subject must 
 be to learn the truth fully that in turn he may 
 speak it. The questions which are raised are mo- ^ 
 mentous and personal If we believe that the 
 answers which I have given are true or like the 
 truth, our modes of thought and our lives must 
 bear witness to our Faith. 
 
 And it seems impossible not to acknowledge 
 that the recognition of the Resurrection as a fact 
 which has moulded the thoughts of Christians and 
 yet retains the fulness of its vital power, is less 
 spontaneous and instinctive among us than it 
 
 1)2 
 
viii Preface, 
 
 ought to be in a Christian age. Nay more, its 
 teachings are not so much neglected as absolutely 
 unperceived in popular estimates of what Christi-* 
 anity claims to be and is. Two passages from 
 recent works, which have perhaps nothing else in 
 common, will illustrate my meaning. 'There is 
 1 no hope/ we are told, ( of a good understanding 
 ' with Orientals [i. e. Muslims] until Western Chris- 
 'tians can bring themselves to recognize what 
 'there is of common faith contained in the two 
 1 religions ; the real difference consists in all the 
 1 class of notions and feelings (very important ones, 
 'no doubt) which we derive not from the Gospels 
 ' but from Greece and Rome, and which are alto- 
 1 gether wanting here [in the East]/ And again : 
 ' Christian morality (so called) has all the charac- 
 ' ters of a re-action ; it is, in great part, a protest 
 ' against Paganism. Its ideal is negative rather 
 ' than positive : passive rather than active : Inno- 
 cence rather than Nobleness: Abstinence from 
 ' Evil rather than energetic Pursuit of Good; in its 
 1 precepts (as has been well said) " thou shalt not " 
 
 * predominates unduly over " thou shalt " 
 
 ' It holds out the hope of heaven and the threat of 
 
Preface. ix 
 
 'hell as the appointed and appropriate motives to 
 
 ' a virtuous life Even in the morality of pri- 
 
 1 vate life, whatever exists of magnanimity, high- 
 * mindedness, . personal dignity, even the sense of 
 'honour, is derived from the purely human, not the 
 ' religious part of our education, and never could 
 ' have grown out of a standard of ethics in which 
 1 the only worth, professedly recognized, is that of 
 ' obedience* Now, apart from all other criticism, 
 to which these statements lie open, it is not too 
 much to say that they absolutely could not have 
 been written if their authors had realized that 
 Christianity is emphatically the Gospel of the 
 Resurrection, in which fact lies a spring of human 
 dignity and social fellowship infinitely deeper and 
 fuller than anything which was anticipated in 
 classical teaching. 
 
 During the passage of the Essay through the 
 press I have been indebted to many friends, and 
 especially to one, for important suggestions and 
 criticisms. Of some I have been able to make 
 use: others, if an opportunity be given me, I shall 
 hope to use hereafter; for all I render them my 
 sincere thanks. And the deepest obligation whicli 
 
x Preface. 
 
 any reader can confer upon me will be to point out 
 whatever seems obscure or faulty or erroneous in 
 what is here advanced. For writer and- for reader 
 Truth is the common aim. The subject is not a 
 vain thing for tis : it is oar life. 
 
 B. F. W. 
 
 Cambridge, 
 
 Dec. i6th, [865. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 STATEMENT OF THE QUESTION . pp. i— u 
 
 The Resurrection as the central truth of Christianity (§§ I— 3) ; 
 either true or false : no mean (4). 
 Morally a Revelation (5). 
 Historically a Fact (6). 
 
 A religion of the world necessarily historical (7). 
 The history essentially moral (8). 
 Preliminary questions (9). 
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 IDEASOFGOD,NATURE,MIRACLES. pp.13— 43 
 
 The difficulties of Christianity essentially included in common 
 
 HMIi), 
 
 which offers mysteries insoluble by us (2), 
 
 reducible to the final antithesis of finite and infinite (3), 
 
xii Contents. 
 
 I. Christianity assumes the existence of 
 
 An Infinite Personal God, 
 A finite human will (4). 
 
 Explanation of the terms (5). 
 Hence we gain some conceptions of 
 (o) Nature in relation to God (6). 
 
 The idea of Succession belongs to our apprehension of 
 God's action and not to His action in itself (7). 
 
 (p) Laws of Nature : Simply laws of human observation (8), 
 which include the operation of an unknown force (9), 
 and cannot therefore be absolute (10). 
 
 Indeterminate powers in Nature (11, 12). 
 
 I I. Christianity claims to be miraculous (13). 
 
 The idea of a miracle (14). 
 A miracle not impossible (15), 
 nor unnatural (16). 
 
 (a) In relation to God 
 
 A miracle not an afterthought (17), 
 nor due to a material cause (18). 
 
 (/3) In relation to man 
 
 A miracle generally involves an indeterminate element 
 
 (19), 
 
 and is predominantly subject to moral conditions (20). 
 Why a scientific age is incredulous of miracles (21). 
 
 Yet instinct is not conquered by science (22). 
 Miraculous records not antecedently incredible (24). 
 
 The alternative (25). 
 
Contents. xiii 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE RESURRECTION AND HISTORY. 
 
 pp.44— 1 18 
 
 • 
 
 Christianity claims to restore harmony to all creation (§1). 
 A historical Progress observable in the physical (2, 3) and moral 
 worlds (4, 5). 
 
 With which Christianity is intimately connected (6), accord- 
 ing to the teaching of the Apostles (7), whether the ad- 
 vance was realized among the Jews or Gentiles (8). 
 And Christianity itself is a history (9), and has been de- 
 veloped historically (10). 
 In this lies its distinguishing characteristic (n), which cen- 
 tres in faith in the Person of Christ (12). 
 If therefore the circumstances of its origin were unique, so 
 also may have been the phenomena which it included 
 
 I. Christianity in connexion with Universal History. 
 
 (a) The relation of Christianity to pre-Christian history (16). 
 
 (a) Jewish History. Characteristics of the history of 
 the Jews (17 — 20). 
 
 (1) The discipline of Egypt (21). 
 
 Sinai (22). 
 The Conquest (23). 
 The Kingdom (24, 25). 
 The Captivity (26). 
 The Dispersion (27, 28). 
 
 (2) The development of the idea of a Deliverer (29). 
 
 The doctrine of Messiah (30). 
 
 The Word (31). 
 Contrast of the two doctrines (32). 
 
xiv Contents. 
 
 (b) Gentile history (33). 
 
 (1) , Greek literature and thought (34). 
 
 (2) Roman statesmanship and law (35). 
 The crisis (36). 
 
 (j8) The relation of Christianity to post • Christian history (37). 
 General outline of its progress (38, 39). 
 
 (a) The Church of the first centuries. Orthodox (40). 
 
 (b) The mediaeval Church. Catholic (41). 
 
 (c) The Church of Modern Europe. Evangelical (42). 
 The divisions mark a real but not final advance (43, 44). 
 
 II. The special evidence for the Resurrection (45). 
 (a) The testimony of St Paul (46). 
 
 Conclusive as to the universal and definitely ex- 
 pressed belief of Christians within ten years 
 afterwards that the event was historically true 
 (47—49). 
 03) The character of the event 
 
 (a) Excludes the possibility of delusion (50). 
 (6) Not anticipated by any popular belief (51). 
 (c) Contrary to the Messianic expectations of the 
 Jews (52), 
 to the ideas of the Apostles (53). 
 
 (7) The effects of the event 
 
 (a) On the character of the Apostles (54), 
 
 (b) On the Apostolic view of the Person of Christ (55), 
 
 (c) Especially on St Paul's teaching on the Death of 
 
 Christ (56, 57), and our relation to Him (58). 
 
 (5) The relation of the belief in the event to other parts of 
 Christian doctrine. 
 The return of Christ (59). 
 The Holy Sacraments (60). 
 Summary (61). 
 
Contents. xv 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 THE RESURRECTION AND MAN pp. 1 19— 167 
 
 The final elements of every moral question : God, the World, 
 Self (§2). 
 The individual 'self ('I') felt at present to bo twofold (3), 
 and the antithesis which it includes is essential to our 
 personality (4). 
 
 Hence arise the questions 
 
 I. Will our Personality be preserved after 
 death? 
 
 II. What is the future relation of Self to 
 God? 
 
 III. What is the relation of Self to the 
 World? 
 
 I. Personality, as far as we can see, depends upon the special 
 limitation (body) through which the soul acts (6). 
 
 (a) Keason can shew that we survive death by shewing 
 either that 
 
 (a) The soul will itself have a personal existence ; 
 or that 
 
 (b) It will act through an organism corresponding to 
 its present one. 
 
 But (a) On principles of Reason there is no reason to 
 think that the individual soul is personal (8). 
 
 (i) The judgment of Aristotle (9, 10). 
 
xvi Contents. 
 
 (2) The arguments adduced in support of the 
 belief apply to the past as well as to the 
 
 future (11). 
 
 (3) Plato's teaching based on instinct not 
 reason (12). 
 
 (b) We have no ground for supposing that the soul 
 can take to itself any organization soever (13). 
 
 Thus there remains a final conflict between Instinct 
 and Reason as to our future Personality (14). 
 
 (ft) The doctrine of the Resurrection preserves the idea of 
 our Personality completely (15). 
 The Lord's Body the same (16, 17), 
 
 yet changed (18). 
 After death the whole complex nature of man is en- 
 nobled (19). 
 
 II. The final relation of man to God depends upon the reality 
 and issues of sin (20). 
 
 (a) What reason teaches of sin. 
 
 (a) The possibility of sin included in the idea of 
 a finite, free being (21). 
 
 (b) Its realization not required for moral develop- 
 ment, though in some forms it may be subser- 
 vient to it (22 — 26). 
 
 (c) It is indeed essentially foreign to our nature, 
 and yet when once realized permanent in its 
 effects (28, 29). 
 
 Thus there remains an Instinct which looks for for- 
 giveness of sin, and Reason which points to the 
 inexorable sequence of the results of action (30). 
 
Contents. xvii 
 
 (/3) The light which the Resurrection throws on the 
 forgiveness of sin (31). 
 
 In what way the Lord's Suffering and Triumph 
 belong to us (32 — 38). 
 
 III. The relation of Self to the World. 
 
 This is indicated by the dignity assigned to the body 
 (39), which is the seed of that which shall be (40). 
 
 Effects of the doctrine: 
 
 I. Morally as to the individual and society (41 — 43). 
 
 II. Physically in relation to the outer world (44, 45). 
 Summary (46 — 48). 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE RESURRECTION AND THE CHURCH 
 
 pp. 168 — 216 
 
 Various images under which the Christian society is described 
 
 (a) A Kingdom (§§ 1, 1). 
 
 03) A Temple (3, 4). 
 
 (y) A Body (5). 
 How these images are seen in the light of the Resurrection. 
 
 (a) A spiritual kingdom: a new heaven and a new 
 earth (7, 8). 
 
 (/3) A structure reared through many ages and hal- 
 lowed by One Spirit (9). 
 
 (7) The visible Body of the Risen Christ (10). 
 
xv in Contents. 
 
 Contrast between the fundamental idea of Christianity as the 
 basis of a society and those of 
 
 Paganism (13), 
 Judaism (14). 
 The principle of unity (16, 17) 
 
 Illustrated by the Resurrection (18). 
 The principle of life (19). 
 
 I. The essential unity of the Church does not require external 
 unity (21), 
 
 nor one visible centre of authority such as was for a time 
 established at Jerusalem (22), or 
 Rome (23). 
 
 The extent of variation consistent with sub- 
 stantial unity not to be determined antece- 
 dently (24); 
 
 illustrated by the history of the Jewish 
 Church (25). 
 
 The admission of the necessity of variations in 
 the Church does not sanction sectarianism 
 (26, 27). 
 
 Progress itself implies antagonism (28) and in- 
 dividuality (29). 
 
 II. The essential unity of the Church seen in its historic deve- 
 lopment (30, 31). 
 
 This development one of organization (32) 
 
 not of doctrine absolutely (33), 
 
 corresponding to the general progress of civili- 
 zation (34), and the complexity of the Chris- 
 tian Body (35). 
 
Contents. xix 
 
 Hence it includes many partial and transitional de- 
 velopments, which are set aside when their work 
 is done (36). 
 How far this development is due to human imperfec- 
 tion (37). 
 
 Scripture the unchanging test of development (38). 
 Our age presents an epitome of all past ages (39). 
 Churches l redeem each other ' (40). 
 Grounds of hope in the midst of the contradictions of 
 modern life (41, 4a). 
 Conclusion (44). 
 
STATEMENT OF THE QUESTION. 
 
 KaXbv t6 dOXov Kal 77 iXirls fieyaXf]. 
 
 PLATO. 
 
 j TEAN PAUL, in one of his magnificent ^ate 
 *J Dreams, has endeavoured to present question. 
 to the mind an image of the infinite extent and 
 fulness of the Universe. He represents his dis- 
 embodied Spirit as carried by thought from sys- 
 tem to system through the starry skies under the 
 conduct of some Angel of light. Wearied at 
 length and bowed down with the overwhelming 
 sense of his littleness as he traverses the desolate 
 intervals between world and world, he prays that 
 he may go no further : * I am lonely in creation : 
 1 lonelier in these wastes. The full world is great ; 
 'but Vacancy is greater/ And the answer came 
 1 In the sight of God there is no Vacancy. Even 
 ' now, child of man, let thy quickened eye be- 
 • hold, and thy dreaming heart embrace the depths 
 ' of Being which are around thee/ Then his eye 
 was opened and a sea of light filled all the spaces 
 which had seemed desolate before, and his heart 
 
 1 
 
2 The Resurrection is the 
 
 felt the presence of an unspeakable power, swell- 
 griQj, ing in varied forms of existence around him. 
 Suns and planets were seen to float as mere 
 specks in the vast ocean of life which was re- 
 vealed to him. For a time he was conscious of 
 no pain. Immeasurable joy and thanksgiving 
 tilled his soul. But in this glorious splendour his 
 guide had vanished. He was alone in the midst 
 of life, and he yearned for some companionship. 
 ' Then there came sailing onwards/ he continues, 
 'from the depth, through the galaxies of stars, a 
 ' dark globe along the sea of light; and a human 
 'form, as a child, stood upon it, which neither 
 'changed nor yet grew greater as it drew near. 
 'At last I recognised our Earth before me, and on 
 'it the Child Jesus, and He looked upon me with 
 'a look so bright and gentle and loving, that I 
 awoke for love and joy/ 
 
 ± The thought which inspires this grand 
 LOB is that which I wish now to develope and 
 confirm. It is my object to shew that a belief in 
 the Resurrection of our Lord is not indeed the 
 solution (for that we cannot gain), but the illu- 
 mination of the mysteries of life : that in this 
 fact the apparent contradictions of the immensity 
 and insignificance of the individual are harmo- 
 nized i that in this lies an end to which pre- 
 
8 
 
 central truth of Christianity. 3 
 
 Christian history converged, a spring from which ^^ E - 
 post- Christian history flows: that in this man question. 
 finds the only perfect consecration of his entire 
 nature : that in this there is contained a promise ) 
 for the future which removes, as far as may be, 
 the sense of isolation which belongs to our finite 
 nature, and unites our world again to the absolute 
 ml eternal. That in this, to sum up all briefly, 
 we may contemplate Christianity in relation to 
 history, to man, and to the future, not as a vague 
 idea, or as a set of dogmas, or even as a system, 
 but as the witness to actual events, in the sub- 
 stantial reality of w T hich lies all its power and all 
 its hope. 
 
 3. At the outset it is important to define the 
 field within which the foundation of our inquiry 
 lies, and to close it within the narrowest limits. 
 It includes only the Cross and the Sepulchre. 
 It is open to the full light of day. The Death, 
 the Burial, and the Resurrection of Christ, claim 
 to be facts exactly in the same sense, to be sup- 
 ported by evidence essentially identical in kind, 
 and to be bound together indissolubly as the 
 groundwork of the Christian Faith. If they are 
 true, then they will be seen to form the centre 
 round which other truths group themselves, not 
 less real, nor less significant, though they are not 
 
 1—2 
 
•i The Resurrection 
 
 state- equally capable of being directly subjected to 
 
 question, historical tests. If they are not true, then 'is our 
 
 1 faith vain/ Christianity is a name and nothing 
 
 more, a sentiment, an aspiration, the expression 
 
 and not the satisfaction of human need. 
 
 4. The natural indistinctness of common lan- 
 guage seems to leave room for a vague impression 
 that in this case there is some mean between 
 truth and falsehood: that though the Resurrec- 
 tion was not a fact (as the Crucifixion was a fact), 
 yet it was something more than a fiction: that 
 it expressed (it may be) an intuition or a divine 
 belief. Yet it is obvious that the power of the 
 Resurrection, as the ground of religious hope, lies 
 in the very circumstance that the event which 
 changed the whole character of the disciples was 
 external to them, independent of them, unex- 
 pected by them. We are speaking here, of course, 
 of things as they present themselves to the senses, 
 and in this light the Resurrection claims to have 
 been of the same order as the Burial of the Lord. 
 Its objectivity is essential to its significance. A 
 conviction that a particular person had risen again, 
 when he had not, is simply false, however it may 
 have been produced. And if the conviction em- 
 bodies itself in a circumstantial narrative of facts 
 intended to establish the imaginary event, the 
 
true or false : no mean. 5 
 
 narrative is simply a falsehood and nothing more. SMSS 
 There are cases where fictitious or unreal details quIst?o E n 
 convey a true idea of the whole, and it might 
 be so with the details of the Resurrection; but 
 here it is the whole and not the details which, 
 on such a supposition, is imaginary. The Resur- 
 rection then is either a fact in itself wholly in- 
 dependent of those who w r ere witnesses to it, 
 or it is a fiction — it matters not whether designed 
 or undesigned — on which no belief can be found- 
 ed. It is a real link between the seen and the 
 unseen worlds, or it is at best the expression of 
 a human instinct. Christ has escaped from the 
 corruption of death ; or men, as far as the future 
 is concerned, are exactly where they were before 
 He came. Whatever may be the civilizing power 
 of Christian morality, it can throw no light upon 
 the grave. If the Resurrection be not true in 
 the same sense in which the Passion is true, then 
 Death still remains the great conqueror. As far 
 as all experience goes, no pledge has been given to 
 us of his defeat. A splendid guess or a vague 
 desire alone have sought to pierce the darkness 
 beyond the tomb, if Jesus has not (as we believe) 
 borne our human nature into the presence of 
 God. 
 
 5. When once we grasp clearly the momen- 
 
G The Resurrection 
 
 W£jg tons interests which are involved in the belief in 
 1!! N the Resurrection, we shall be prepared to under- 
 stand how it formed the central point of the 
 Apostolic teaching; and yet more than this, how 
 the event itself is the central point of history. 
 It often seems indeed as if we do not realize the 
 vastness of the consequences which it brings. 
 An influential Christian teacher has sail that 
 the Resurrection belongs to the teaching on 
 Scripture rather than to the teaching on the 
 Person of Christ, forgetting that faith in Christ 
 the Saviour did not precede but follow it. 
 Even, those who hold most firmly to a faith in 
 the Resurrection are tempted to regard it as a 
 doctrine rather than as a fact, as an article of 
 belief rather than as a sensible ground of hope. 
 Gradually we have been led to dissociate faith 
 in the resurrection of the body from the actual 
 Resurrection of Christ, which is the earnest of it. 
 And not unfrequently we substitute for the ful- 
 ness of the Christian creed the purely philosophic 
 conception of an immortality of the soul, which 
 destroys, as we shall see hereafter, the idea of 
 the continuance of our distinct personal existence. 
 But according to the divine instinct of the first 
 age, the message of the Resurrection sums up in 
 one fact the teaching of the Gospel. It is the 
 one central link between the seen and the un- 
 
J 
 
 morally a Revelation. 7 
 
 We cannot allow our thoughts to be vague state 
 or undecided upon it with impunity. We must A§bstk)S 
 place it in the very front of our confession, with/ 
 all that it includes, or we must be prepared to 
 lay aside the Christian name. Even in its ethi- 
 cal aspect Christianity does not offer a system of I 
 morality, but a universal principle of morality 
 which springs out of the Resurrection. The ele- 
 ments of dogma and morality are indeed insepa- 
 rably united in the Resurrection of Christ ; for the 
 same fact which reveals the glory of the Lord, 
 reveals at the same time the destiny of man and 
 the permanence of all that goes to make up the 
 felnesa of human life. If the Resurrection be 
 not true, the basis of Christian morality, no less 
 than the basis of Christian theology, is gone. 
 Thus the issue cannot be stated too broadly. 
 To preach the fact of Resurrection was the first 
 function of the Evangelists; to embody the doc- 
 trine of the Resurrection is the great office of 
 the Church; to learn the meaning of the Resur- 
 rection is the task not of one age only, but of 
 all. Yet there seem to be times when the truth 
 has a special significance: times, like our own, 
 when the spirit of material progress tends to con- 
 fine the thoughts of men within the limits of its 
 own domain, and the sense of the infinite vastness 
 (so to speak) of our present finite being turns 
 
8 The Resurrection as a fact 
 
 the sou] away from its natural aspirations towards 
 the absolute and the unseen. 
 
 6. This is one aspect of our subject. The 
 Resurrection is a revelation, so far as sucli a 
 revelation is possible, of the spiritual world and 
 of our own connexion with it. But it has also 
 another aspect as a fact in the common history 
 of the world. Its essentially objective character 
 is not less important than its divine message. 
 For we may notice that every religion which is 
 to move the world must be based on a history. 
 A religion drawn solely from the individual con- 
 sciousness of man can only reflect a particular 
 form of intellectual development. Its influence 
 is limited by the mould in which it is cast. Its 
 applicability is confined to those who have at- 
 tained to a special culture. Even to the last it 
 is essentially of the mind and not of the heart or 
 of the life. This is obvious equally from the 
 record of the speculations on Natural Theology, 
 and from the history of all those religions which 
 have had any power in the world. A subjective 
 religion brings with it no element of progress 
 and cannot lift man out of himself. A historical 
 revelation alone can present God as an object of 
 personal love. The external world answering to 
 human instinct suggests the conception of His 
 
the basis of Christianity. 9 
 
 eternal power, but offers nothing which justifies \ ^[atk 
 in us the confidence of ' sons/ Man is but one question. 
 of the many elements of creation and cannot 
 arrogate to himself any special relationship with 
 his Maker. Pure Theism is unable to form a \ 
 living religion. Mahommedanism lost all reli- 
 gious power in a few generations. Judaism sur- 
 vived for fifteen centuries every form of assault 
 in virtue of the records of a past deliverance on 
 which it was based, and the hope of a future 
 Deliverer which it included. 
 
 7. It is possible that individual exceptions 
 may be found to the general truth of these state- 
 ment8. Faith is indeed without question the 
 spring of all progressive or universal religion; 
 and the essence of faith lies in the transference 
 of trust to something outside the believer. Yet 
 on the other hand 'some great souls appear to 
 have an immediate perception of isolated truths, 
 so that in their case a thought becomes a dis- 
 tinct reality, contemplated, as it were, apart from 
 the thinker. For such men faith in a thought is 
 possible, and is the source of all that approaches 
 most nearly to a new creation in human history. 
 These solitary heroes can in some measure at 
 least live as seeing the unseen by the force of 
 their innate power; but for the mass faith needs 
 
10 The fact and the idea 
 
 some outward pledge to rest upon, and some 
 question, outward fact to call it into action. Exactly in 
 proportion as the popular idea of religion is sepa- 
 rated from the personal relation of the worshipper 
 to the Deity, attested (or supposed to be attested) 
 by historical manifestations, the worship itself 
 degenerates into a discipline or a form. Even 
 Christianity is capable of such a degradation; 
 but we need only to go back to the Evangelists 
 to regain a pure conception of its majesty. As 
 it is seen in their narratives it satisfies equally 
 the wants of the few and of the many; and that 
 most signally in the message of the Resurrection, 
 wind i was the assurance of the establishment of 
 the kingdom of God. The facts of the visible 
 Life of Christ are for all time a living Gospel ; 
 and the doctrine which they include meets and 
 carries forward the boldest speculations of philo- 
 sophy. 
 
 8. For it is evident that the events recorded 
 by the Evangelists while they are most truly his- 
 torical are not merely history. Their significance 
 is not in the past only or even chiefly. And so 
 also the evidence by which they are supported is 
 l not simply that of direct testimony. The au- 
 thority of testimony is supplemented by that of 
 the instinct within us which recognises the har- 
 
necessarily combined. 11 
 
 mony of a Revelation claiming to be divine with s ™™- 
 the essential wants of man. And thus in d is- -question. 
 
 ring the truth of the Resurrection as a fact it-' 
 is impossible not to take into consideration its 
 moral significance. Evidence which would be 
 felt to be insufficient to prove the occurrence of 
 a prodigy, may be amply sufficient to establish 
 the objective reality of a fact which is found to 
 r to circumstances or conditions of our 
 nature. Nay more, it may be affirmed that no 
 external evidence alone could ever establish more 
 tli.ii an 'otiose* belief in the occurrence of an 
 isolated or seemingly arbitrary miracle in a dis- 
 tant age, while the combination of external and 
 internal evidence is capable of producing a mea- 
 sure of conviction which is only less certain than 
 an immediate intuition. 
 
 9. But in order to estimate the spiritual 
 significance of the Resurrection we must first 
 take into account the relation in which it stands 
 to many elementary thoughts which lie at the 
 very foundation of our ordinary life. "Above all 
 it is necessary that we should set down clearly 
 what must be taken for granted and not proved : 
 what is the conception which we form of Nature, 
 and of miracles : what are the limits within which 
 human speculation is confined. Till these points 
 
12 Outline of the plan. 
 
 WAf£ are determined, as far as they seem to admit of 
 
 KENT ' J 
 
 question, determination, all further discussion must be 
 fruitless. If, for example, a miracle is inherently 
 incredible, it is idle to reason about a fact which 
 in the end must be explained away. If on the 
 other hand we hold that miracles are, in certain 
 cases, as credible as ordinary events generally, it 
 is necessary that we should shew how this belief 
 is reconcileable with the ideas which we entertain 
 of an Infinite God and of the constancy of natural 
 laws. These fundamental questions will form the 
 subject of the Introduction ; and afterwards we 
 shall be in a position to consider the Resurrection 
 in itself and in its application to History, to the 
 Individual, and to Society. 
 
INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Tptyourai iravres ol avOpumivoi v6[xot vtt6 tv6$ rod Oelov' 
 Kpartei yap tojovtov 6k6jov ZOtXei ko.1 t^apKe'ei wdaiv ical 
 
 it epty Literal. 
 
 ffEJL4CJ.rr is. 
 
 1. HPHE simplicity of the Gospel is not due introbuc- 
 J- to the absence of difficulties, but to the 
 coincidence of the difficulties which it involves 
 With the inherent difficulties of human existence, 
 when existence is taken as a subject of specu- 
 lation. Christianity does indeed involve many 
 difficulties, but it does not create them. Thv 
 difficulties themselves beset us in our daily life ; 
 but as long as they take a practical form, they 
 receive a practical answer. Christianity, however, 
 which reveals the significance of life makes us 
 also feel its mysteries. It brings out what was 
 ill-defined before, like the light which does not 
 make the shadows, though they are seen by 
 contrast with it. The truth involved in this dis- 
 tinction is of vital importance towards the under- 
 standing of its claims. An imperious instinct 
 
14 The difficulties of Christianity 
 
 ;; 'duo- commands us to look beyond or beneath the 
 phenomena of physical life. We cannot acquiesce 
 in ignorance; and that religion necessarily claims 
 our allegiance which answers most completely to 
 all the conditions of our nature. If it could be 
 shewn that Christianity introduces some idea into 
 life wholly alien from its common tenor, or assumes 
 principles which we do not act upon, or asserts 
 consequences at variance with the natural reason 
 of men, we might pause before receiving its teach- 
 ing. But if on the contrary its mysteries rest on 
 fundamental mysteries of our finite being; if it 
 kes its stand on human nature as it is and 
 interprets ii if it carries on thoughts 
 
 of which we feel the beginnings within ourselves, 
 and opens gleams of hope where we acknowledge 
 that our prospect is clouded ; then it cannot but 
 be monstrous to reject it for reasons on which we 
 might with equal justice declare life itself to be 
 impossible. 
 
 2. For instance, the existence of matter, the 
 relation of soul and body, the existence of evil, 
 existence absolutely, and in time and space, indi- 
 vidual freedom and general laws of sequence, are 
 all fundamental and final mysteries from which 
 we can never escape. They are taken account of 
 and dealt with in the doctrines of Christianity, 
 
difficulties of Life. 15 
 
 but Christianity does not make them. It will be IN ^5 UC * 
 seen hereafter how they are dealt with, but for 
 the present it is enough to notice that the rejec- 
 tion of the mysteries of Christianity will not 
 eliminate the element of mystery from life. The 
 very idea of life involves the antithesis of finite 
 and infinite, and the special difficulties which 
 have been enumerated simply represent the 
 various forms which this one fundamental diffi- 
 culty assumes when contemplated in connexion 
 with the physical world pr with human action. 
 
 3. This antithesis of the finite and the infi- 
 nite which meets us as soon as we lift our thoughts 
 above single phenomena is the final basis of all 
 religion. It is apprehended more or less sharply 
 in different ages or races, but the essence of wor- 
 ship even in its lowest form necessarily includes 
 the tendency towards a true perception of it. In 
 this respect Christianity differs from all other 
 religions, not in principle, but in virtue of the 
 absolute clearness with which the idea of the 
 antithesis is laid down. The two terms are re- 
 garded in their most complete separation and 
 then they are combined in One Person. But 
 in saying this we are anticipating what will 
 appear more natuTally afterwards. It is not 
 necessary yet to consider how Christianity re- 
 
16 Fundamental 
 
 introduc- solves or harmonizes the antithesis on which it, 
 equally with all religions, is founded. That which 
 is essential to our argument is that the antithesis 
 If is not brought into being by Christianity, 
 but is the clear expression 'of an instinct, which 
 has sought at all times to embody itself in reli- 
 gious thought and worship — in thought as well as 
 in worship: for the mind which strives to e 
 bl isli its own relation to the unseen by the wor- 
 ship of a God, is always led at the same time to 
 ponder on the relation of the world to the same 
 Power. 
 
 4. Christianity therefore as the absolute re- 
 ligion of man assumes as its foundation the exist- 
 ence of an Infinite Personal God and a finite 
 human will. This antithesis is assumed and not 
 proved. No arguments can establish it. It is a 
 primary intuition and not a deduction. It is 
 capable of illustration from what we observe 
 around us; but if either term is denied no reason- 
 ing can establish its truth. Each man for him- 
 self is supposed to be conscious of the existence of 
 God and of his own existence. We can go no 
 further. If he has not, or says he has not 
 this consciousness, he must be regarded as one 
 whose powers are imperfect. It would be as vain 
 to reason with him on religion as to reason on 
 
Assumptions, 17 
 
 the phenomena of light with a blind man. No ^Tggg 17 ^ 
 proof can establish the existence of that within 
 a man of which he alone has the final cognizance. 
 Practically every one is found to act as if he 
 believed that he had a will, and also as if he were 
 justly accountable for his actions : he is conscious 
 of satisfaction within himself, and awards praise 
 or blame to others; but whether this be univer- 
 sally true or not is of no real moment to us. It 
 is taken for granted that religion is possible ; and 
 if so the conceptions which are involved in the 
 fundamental antithesis on which it reposes are 
 also assumed to be true, though they do not 
 admit of a formal proof. If they are not axioms 
 we claim them as postulates. 
 
 5. But though we appeal to the individual 
 consciousness for the recognition of the truth of 
 the assumptions which have been made, the lan- 
 guage in which one term of the antithesis is ex- 
 pressed requires explanation. We speak of God 
 as Infinite and Personal. The epithets involve 
 a contradiction, and yet they are both necessary. 
 In fact the only approximately adequate concep- 
 tion which we can form of a Divine Being is 
 under the form. of a contradiction. For us per- 
 sonality is only the name for special limitation 
 exerting itself through will ; and will itself im- 
 
 2 
 
18 Nature in 
 
 IX noN. UC " plies the idea of resistance. But as applied to 
 God the notions of limitation and resistance are 
 eluded by the antithetic term infinite. For us 
 again infinity excludes the conception of special 
 action: it belongs to the nature and not to the 
 manifestation of being. But as applied to God 
 it is necessarily connected with action and with 
 phenomena, because it is only through these that 
 personality, so far as we observe it, can shew 
 itself. Thus it follows that by speaking of God as 
 Infinite we simply mean that none of the deduc- 
 tions which can be drawn from corresponding 
 attributes or powers, or the uses of power in man, 
 (in b* tyr&nsfarred to Him. It would be false 
 for instance to argue from the usual sense of the 
 terms employed that what He 'does' or 'pur- 
 poses ' is in itself bound by time and space. And 
 on the other hand by speaking of Him as Perso- 
 nal we wish to express that He rules and creates 
 if it were by will, with a purpose towards 
 which all things are guided. So only can we 
 guard against the representation of God as the 
 Absolute simply, whether the Absolute be re- 
 garded as the Unchangeable which lies beneath 
 the changing phenomena of the world, or as the 
 sum of all that ' is/ 
 
 6. This conception of the Divine Being, 
 
relation to God. 
 which, it must be remembered, is not peculfcr to introdic- 
 
 ^^v TION. 
 
 Christianity, except in the distinctness of its enunX^ 
 ciation, clears the way to our apprehension of the 
 course and phenomena of Nature. For we can- 
 not contemplate Nature apart from God. Hence 
 it is against all reason to press the results of our 
 observation of phenomena to consequences in- 
 consistent with our conception of His infinite and 
 personal Being. Two errors are specially to be 
 guarded against which are most fruitful of fallaci- 
 ous issues. The one is the transference of the 
 phenomena of succession and gradual growth and 
 slow sequence, which are necessarily part of our 
 observation of nature, to Nature as the expression 
 of the Divine will. The other is the supposition 
 that 'laws' have in themselves (so to speak) a 
 motive force : that the law, which declares the 
 mode in which phenomena present themselves to 
 us, has some virtue by which the phenomena are 
 absolutely; or, in other words, that the Law not / 
 only declares how we see things, but makes them 
 such as we see them. Each of these misconcep- 
 tions will require to be noticed a little more in 
 detail. 
 
 7. The only idea which we can form of 
 Nature, that is of the sum of all phenomena, in 
 relation to an Infinite Mind is as one thought. 
 
 2—2 
 
£0 Succession not true for God. 
 
 ^moh 110 " ^ or ^ 0D a ^ * s one an( ^ a ^ oncel - He * s cognizant 
 (if we may so say) of things themselves, and not, 
 as we naturally think and reason, of our percep- 
 tions of them. He sees them as they are and not 
 as we observe them. Indeed, if we reflect, there 
 is something strangely absurd in applying to the 
 Pivine Power conclusions which are based on 
 human apprehensions of things. We must, be- 
 cause we are finite, conceive of things as hap- 
 pening in time; and in the same way we must 
 conceive of God as acting, whenever He acts, 
 in time ; but it is equally clear that we must not 
 argue as if time belonged really to the Di 
 
 ition to the world, or as if God acted at this 
 time and that, or at every moment, one after 
 another. Any conclusion which rests on this 
 supposition as a premiss is radically false. The 
 statement that 'God acts' is true at all times 
 
 1 The reader will be glad to recal the thought as it is worke4 
 out in Tennyson's noble words : 
 
 To your question now, 
 Which touches on the workman and his work. 
 Let there be light and there was light : 'tis so ; 
 For was, and is, and will be, are but is ; 
 And all creation is one act at once, 
 The birth of light : but we that are not all, 
 As parts, can see but parts, now this, now that, 
 And live, perforce, from thought to thought, and make 
 One act a phantom of succession : thus 
 Our weakness somehow shapes the shadow, Time. 
 
Laws of Observation. 21 
 
 in regard to our human conception of Him. in ™on UC ~ 
 We can say justly that He acts now, that He 
 acted then, that He will act at some future mo- 
 ment; but when we reason on the human element 
 in these statements, that is on the temporal limi- 
 tations, it is obvious that this process of reason- 
 ing can give us no conclusion with regard to the 
 action of God. 
 
 8. Again, a 'law of nature* can mean no- « 
 thing else than the law of the human apprehen- ' 
 sion of phenomena. We are forced to regard j 
 things under conditions of time and space and 
 the like, and the consequence is that phenomena 
 are grouped together according to certain rules. 
 We find that for us (such is the constitution of 
 our powers) the sequence of phenomena is this 
 and not that. Partial sequences are compared 
 and combined and thus more general sequences 
 are discovered. But however far we may go we 
 never go beyond ourselves. The law at last is , 
 a law for men: its form depends on limitations 
 which are characteristic of men. We have not 
 the least reason for supposing that it has any 
 absolute existence. For it is obviously a very 
 different thing to say that things when observed 
 by men will be observed by them under such and 
 such limitations* and therefore according to such 
 
-- Laws presuppose Force 
 
 ni »M? ,ro \ am * suc ^ ^ aws> ^ rom sa y m s suca an( ^ sucn are tne 
 
 laws of things in themselves and for all intelli- 
 gent beings. And if we know nothing of the 
 laws of things in themselves, how can we know 
 anything of things in relation to God ? 
 
 — i* / 9. From what has been said it is evident 
 that a law, which expresses nothing more than 
 the result of our observation of phenomena, can- 
 not make phenomena what they are. It is no 
 explanation of how the phenomena came to be 
 or continue to be. It would have appeared to be 
 insisting on a truism to dwell on this, were it not 
 for the general idea which seems to find currency, 
 that when a law (as of gravitation) is laid down 
 nothing more remains to be explained. The law 
 may afterwards (it is admitted) be found to be 
 part of one much wider and more comprehensive, 
 l>ut, as far as it goes, this satisfies all our inqui- 
 ries. In reality it tells us that something pro- 
 duces results (as far as we are concerned) in such 
 and such a way. But obviously if the knowledge 
 were within our reach our chief desire would be 
 to know what produces the results ? What brings 
 about the phenomena according to the law ? We 
 can shew that if a body be projected in a certain 
 direction and acted upon by a central force vary- 
 ing in a particular way it will describe an orbit 
 
and cannot be absolute. 23 
 
 like that of the earth round the sun. But to go I *Sg5 U0 ' 
 no further, What projected the earth ? It would 
 be easy to follow up this question by others ; but 
 this alone is sufficient to shew that in the sim- 
 plest phenomena we are face to face with a power 
 of which observation can tell us nothing but the 
 fact of its existence. 
 
 10. There is then nothing absolute in laws 
 of nature. They are relative to man, and do 
 not explain either the origin or the preservation 
 of things. It is quite possible for us to conceive 
 that the unknown power through which pheno- 
 mena are produced in this way might have caused 
 them to be produced in another way wholly differ- 
 ent. The belief in the immutability of the ob- 
 served law springs wholly from ourselves, and is 
 simply a special expression of the axiom that the 
 same power will produce the same results under 
 the same circumstances. But we have no right 
 to assume that the circumstances will always be x 
 the same. The range of our observation is bound 
 within very narrow limits. And if, as we have 
 supposed, the divine thought of the world leaves 
 room for the exercise of free human will, it is 
 antecedently likely that we should be enabled 
 in some way to be made sensible of what we call 
 by a figure the Divine wilL We may expect from 
 
24 1 1 power* 
 
 time to time in the evolution of the whole scheme 
 of creation to be made aware of the presence of a 
 Personal Power, not by the suspension of the laws 
 of sequence which we commonly observe, but by 
 the action of some new force. Or to put the sub- 
 ject in another light; as changed circumstances 
 would lead to different results under the action of 
 the same power, so we must allow that there are 
 many cases in which the exertion of the free 
 human will must modify not indeed the Divine 
 ion in itself, but the phenomena in which the 
 results of it are presented to us. The building of 
 a city, for example, which depends on the free 
 action of individuals, may modify to an alii 
 indefinite extent the physical character of its im- 
 mediate neighbourhood, and so more or less of all 
 other districts, in a manner which we can gene- 
 rally follow out ; and thus also we can conceive 
 that the natural though unseen action of God 
 may make itself felt with varying distinctness in 
 the course of ages, though in this case the law of 
 sequence is undiscoverable by us. At least gene- 
 rally it is undeniable that if we believe in the 
 existence of a Personal God by whose influence 
 we are affected, there is no more difficulty in 
 admitting the reality of His action in various ways 
 and degrees on the physical world, than in recog- 
 nizing it (as we do) in our own souls. Indeed the 
 
in Nature. 25 
 
 difficulty in the latter case is greater; for it is per- IN I££P UC ~ 
 haps impossible for us to conceive how the Infinite 
 Divine will can act on the human will (as it is 
 felt to do) without destroying the freedom of man. 
 
 11. Further, it is evident from what has been 
 said as to the extent of creation, of which we 
 see but the least fraction, and of the connexion of 
 its parts one with another, and of the presence 
 about us of forces which we are wholly incompe- 
 tent to estimate, that we are absolutely unable to 
 judge, whether we may not from time to time 
 be capable of calling into action ourselves or 
 otherwise coming under the influence of powers 
 which are usually dormant. Every one must 
 have felt at critical moments that he has a fund 
 of physical strength and also a capacity for mov- 
 ing others bv vigour of will of which under ordi- 
 
 O v O 
 
 nary circumstances he is wholly unconscious. The 
 crisis brings out the gift, and when the crisis is 
 over we fall back again into our usual state. Nor 
 is this the case with individuals only. History 
 shews that there are epochs of extraordinary, and 
 as we should say, who live in calmer times, of 
 unnatural activity and power in societies and 
 nations. A city or a race under the pressure of 
 some great passion works wonders. Above all 
 religious enthusiasm, whether in men or in bodies 
 
26 Christianity 
 
 1N tiu.\ UC °^ Inen, * s ^P^le °f producing results which 
 under ordinary circumstances would be regarded 
 as impossible. It seems as if the idea of an imme- 
 diate intercourse with a spiritual world, quite 
 apart from the special form which it takes, were 
 al»le to quicken mans powers with a marvellous 
 energy and in some degree work out its own ac- 
 complishment. 
 
 12. Thus in contemplating nature from its 
 moral side we find ourselves in the presence of 
 two indetenni n.it t forces. Not only are we forced 
 to admit that there is room in the whole scheme 
 of the world (of which we are poor and imperfect 
 judges) for changed conditions which necessarily 
 include changed results; but also we find that 
 men and mankind generally are possessed of facul- 
 ties capable of vast and indefinite energy. We 
 ( ai mot measure, as we cannot explain, the influ- 
 ence which one mind can exercise on another, or 
 which the mind can exercise on the body. The 
 in H in -nee is obvious, but what are the springs and 
 what the limits of it we cannot tell. In such a 
 case even past experience is no final judge. And 
 this reflection brings us to another fundamental 
 assumption of Christianity. 
 
 13. Christianity assumes, as we have seen, 
 
essentially Miraculous. 27 
 
 the existence of an Infinite Personal God and of a IN1 ^}^ U0 " 
 finite human will : it claims also to be miraculous. 
 It takes for granted that 'miracles' are recognized 
 modes of Divine action. From the conception 
 which we are necessarily led to form of the rela- 
 tion of Nature to the Creator it has been shewn 
 that exceptional action in its course is not only 
 not excluded by the laws which we base on ob- 
 servation, but even antecedently likely. Chris- 
 tianity affirms that this exceptional action does 
 actually take place. And in doing this it only 
 affirms what every other historical religion must 
 affirm ; for all alike appeal to an immediate reve- 
 lation as their original basis. It follows then 
 that all religion which can influence the mass of 
 men (p. 8, § 6) is declared to be impossible if 
 such an exceptional manifestation of God is in- 
 conceivable or unaccomplished. Nothing remains 
 but a faith which begins and ends within the in- 
 dividual. But not to dwell on this, it is evident 
 that if the claim to be a miraculous religion is 
 essentially incredible apostolic Christianity is 
 simply false. If Christ did not rise again — the 
 words cannot be too often repeated — then is our 
 faith vain. Something may be left — a system of 
 morals or the like — but that is not Christianity. 
 The essence of Christianity lies in a miracle ; and 
 if it can be shewn that a miracle is either im- 
 
-8 The idea of a Miracle. 
 
 possible or incredible, all further inquiry into the 
 details of its history is superfluous in a religious 
 point of view. The rise of Christianity will still 
 furnish a historical or philosophical problem of 
 surpassing interest, but the data which it presents 
 will contain nothing on which to found the faith 
 of a world. Thus we are forced to consider whe- 
 ther the difficulties which are supposed to lie in 
 the conception of a miracle are a fatal hindrance 
 to the literal acceptance of the Gospel. 
 
 W-. By a miracle (using the word in its 
 test sense) we mean a phenomenon which 
 either in itself or from the circumstances under 
 which it is presented, suggests the immediate 
 working of a personal power producing results 
 not explicable by what we observe in the ordi- 
 nary course of nature. Thus some facts are in 
 (heir essential character miraculous, as the Re- 
 surrection; others, again, are perfectly natural in 
 themselves, but miraculous from the circum- 
 ices under which they occur, as the miraculous 
 draught of fishes, or to take a different example, 
 the true prediction of a special event. But they 
 have this in common, that they lead us to recog- 
 nize the action of some personal power: they in- 
 volve, as a general rule, an appeal to or a decla- 
 ration of divine strength. Some facts again, as 
 
Miracles not impossible. 29 
 
 many of the cases of healing, may be regarded as 1N ™^ UC " 
 natural or miraculous, according as we look at 
 them as resulting from powers already existing in 
 man and evoked, or as immediate acts of divine 
 blessing. This indeed is a mere question of 
 interpretation. The principle is attested in a 
 single case. He who believes in the Resurrec- 
 tion will feel no anxiety as to the exact limits 
 within which the divine working is to be con- 
 fined. Probably he will see it everywhere and in 
 the same sense, for the difference or identity of 
 mode will seem to him to depend on causes which 
 he cannot investigate. 
 
 15. From what has been already said it will 
 be seen that a miracle cannot be declared impos- 
 sible by any one who believes in a Personal God. 
 Nature is the expression of His will, and ante- 
 cedently to experience we could not have deter- 
 mined that it would be manifested in one way 
 rather than in another. Nor again can all con- 
 ceivable experience give us a complete knowledge 
 of the conditions which may affect its manifesta- 
 tion to us so as to exclude variety. On the con- 
 trary under particular circumstances which may 
 happen if God reveals Himself to men, miracles 
 are as probable as ordinary phenomena under 
 common circumstances. If the result is different, 
 
30 i not 
 
 the power being the same, we suppose that the 
 conditions are different; and conversely if the 
 conditions are different, we suppose that the 
 result will be changed. Nor, again, in speaking 
 of a fact as a miracle do we offer any explanation 
 of its being or becoming. The mystery as to how 
 God acts is left untouched. Whether He acts as 
 He ordinarily does (naturally), or in an extraor- 
 dinary way (miraculously), this fundamental diffi- 
 culty remains absolutely the same. It is neither 
 nor less in the one case than in the 
 other. The power which produces the pheno- 
 iin n.i is iiid. t< lininate and indeterminable. Thus 
 while it Mould be impossible that two and two 
 should ever make five, because the law on which 
 the result depends lies wholly within us; yet it is 
 not impossible that an (unknown) power which 
 as far as our observation reaches has always pro- 
 duced (say) four phenomena of a particular kind, 
 should on a particular occasion produce five such 
 phenomena. 
 
 1G. Yet further it will appear that a miracle 
 is not unnatural that is contrary to and not 
 only different from the observed course of phe- 
 nomena. It would be unnatural only if it were 
 supposed that the miraculous and the ordinary 
 result were both produced by the same force 
 
unnatural. 31 
 
 acting under the same conditions. Or, if for a introduc- 
 
 ° TION. 
 
 moment we may use common language, if it 
 were supposed that the same law could produce 
 different effects. But on the other hand it is dis- 
 tinctly laid down that in the case of a miracle 
 a new force is introduced, or rather, as the source 
 of all force is one, that the force which usually 
 acts freely in a particular way now acts freely in 
 another. Or, to continue to use popular lan- 
 guage, the law is not suspended, but its natural 
 results are controlled. The law produces its full 
 effect, but a new power supervenes, and the final 
 result represents the combined effect of the two 
 forces. Let it once be seen that the law neces- 
 sarily involves the idea of a power acting accord- 
 ing to the law, and acting freely [ for the law is 
 evidently subsequent to and not essentially regu- 
 lative of the action,7and there will be no more 
 difficulty in feeling that the miraculous action of 
 God is as truly natural, that is in accordance with 
 what we may expect from a consideration of the 
 whole scheme of nature, as His ordinary action. 
 To affirm that miracles are unnatural is to consti- 
 tute general laws of observation into a fate supe- 
 rior to God, or to deny His personal action. And 
 it must be observed that the denial of His per- 
 sonal action in the physical world involves the 
 denial of His action on the hearts of men; for 
 
 
 
 
\ 
 
 Miracles not an afterthought ; nor 
 
 oduo- there is not the least reason to suppose that what 
 is seen is less immediately dependent upon Him 
 than what is unseen, or that it can be affirmed 
 beforehand that He is more likely to act on one 
 part of that which He has created than on another. 
 In other words, if miracles are unnatural, thru 
 we are hopelessly enclosed within the barriers of 
 material laws and absolutely shut off from all 
 intercourse with the Infinite. But this is against 
 the fundamental axiom of religion. 
 
 4 o* 
 
 17. It may however be objected thai this 
 view of miracles as occasional manifestations of 
 i he power of God is a conception unworthy of His 
 Majesty: that it represents Him (so to speak) as 
 dependent on time and circumstance. The objec- 
 tion, as far as it has any force, would lie equally 
 against all action of God among men. It 
 indeed, a mystery wholly beyond our comprehen- 
 sion how an Infinite Being can reveal or in any 
 way manifest Himself to finite creatures. But 
 in obedience to an instinct which we cannot qu< 
 tion we have taken it for granted that he doea 
 so. And yet further the iuvidiottshess of the 
 objection lies in the transference to God of those 
 ideas of time and succession which as we have 
 seen (§ 7) are proper only to men. There is no 
 ' occasion ' to God. The world and all its history 
 
necessarily due to a material cause. 33 
 is for Him necessarily one. His action which we introduc- 
 
 J TION. 
 
 contemplate now in one (general) mode, and now 
 in another (exceptional) mode, is not in itself 
 divided, though we are forced so to regard it. 
 The principle (if we may so speak) which accord- 
 ing to His wisdom directs the form of the general 
 action and the principle which directs the form of 
 the exceptional action, are not separated, so that 
 the one is subsequent to and corrective of the 
 other, but simultaneous or coincident. What is 
 unfolded to us in a gradual process of ' becoming ' 
 in relation to an infinite mind simply 'is/ We 
 are obliged to speak of • the purpose of God's will/ 
 and so we are obliged to speak of His 'Special 
 Providence ' or miraculous working ; but the ori- 
 ginal phrase and the adaptation of the phrase to 
 facts are both accommodations ; and we must care- 
 fully guard against any deductions based upon 
 the human element in them (§ 5). 
 
 18. Nor yet again can it be said that mate- 
 rial results involve a material cause. We know 
 absolutely nothing of cause. We know nothing 
 of the power manifested in material results (§ 9). 
 And unless we believe in the eternity of matter, 
 (which is an absolute contradiction,) some material 
 results must have had an immaterial cause. More- 
 over we experience daily the influence of will in 
 
 3 
 
34 Mir! 
 
 1NI ni».\ l c ourse l ves - And it nas teen assumed that our 
 finite will is a real power and potentially free, 
 for otherwise religion is as completely destroyed 
 as by denying the personality of God. 
 
 19. There is yet another aspect in which we 
 may regard Miracles. Viewed from the human 
 Bide, when man himself is looked upon as the 
 centre of the power by which they are wrought, 
 they fall into distinct groups, corresponding to the 
 subject-matter (so to speak) on which they are 
 wrought. Tli us man may be conceived as acting 
 upon the external world absolutely, where the 
 general law is modified by his interference, as if 
 he were to walk on water or control the move- 
 ments of the heavenly bodies : or he may act upon 
 the external world in immediate relation to him- 
 self or to those about him, as if he were to modify 
 die perception of external phenomena in particu- 
 lar cases : or he may act upon man directly, either 
 himself or others, as in the removal of disc , 
 Now in the two latter cases an indeterminate 
 element is introduced, the influence of man upon 
 man, or the working of spirit upon spirit and 
 matter in limited relation to itself ; and prior to 
 observation it is impossible to determine what 
 varying effects may be produced by its opera- 
 tion. Experience alone can determine in each 
 
in relation to Man. 35 
 
 instance what phenomena may be produced by introduc- 
 human will; and the vast range of the power of 
 will and the unknown depth of its relations, sug- 
 gest the possibility of an almost infinite variety 
 of results produced by its action under new con- 
 ditions. From time to time we are startled by 
 occurrences which reveal a power of one mind 
 over another, or of the mind over the body which 
 seems to be practically indeterminate. In these 
 cases then there is (it may be said) a natural open- 
 ing for miracles: they have a point of contact with 
 what we observe in the course of life. In the first 
 case, on the contrary, this 'natural* conception of 
 A miracle is inadmissible. We can understand 
 how the individual will can affect other individuals 
 upon whom it can work immediately, but we can- 
 not see how it can act upon the external world 
 with which it has, as far as we know, nothing 
 homogeneous, or, which would come to the same 
 thing, upon the universal perception of men. 
 Thus in miracles of this kind we are face to face 
 with a final difficulty. Yet even here the miracle 
 has a corresponding phenomenon in life. Special 
 prayer is based upon a fundamental instinct of 
 our nature. And in the fellowship which is esta- 
 blished in prayer between man and God we are 
 brought into personal union with Him in whom 
 all things have their being. In this lies the pos- 
 
 2— 2 
 
36 Moral limitation 
 
 "^jfggjf 5 ' ability of boundless power; for when the con- 
 nexion is once formed, who can lay down the 
 limits of what man can do in virtue of the com- 
 munion of his spirit with the Infinite Spirit? 
 But in one respect all three cases are alike. 
 Whether man works upon nature or upon his 
 fellow-men, it is in virtue of a trust in the unseen. 
 Personal faith is the condition of effectual action; 
 and where God is supposed to act immediately 
 the same condition is satisfied in the recognition 
 of His working. 
 
 20. It follows that the moral element in mi- 
 racles is both essential and predominant. There 
 is ilways a natural relation between the acts and 
 those for whom or by whom they are wrought. 
 They must be therefore (generally speaking) a 
 function of the age in which they are wrought. 
 That which at one time would suggest the idea of 
 God working would not do so at another. The 
 miracles of one period or state of society might be 
 morally impossible in another. It seems certain 
 that knowledge limits faith. For instance, when 
 any particular physical phenomena are appre- 
 hended as subject to a clear law, which is felt to 
 be a definite expression of the Divine Will, it is 
 inconceivable that faith could contemplate an 
 interference with them, not because it would be 
 
of Miracles. 37 
 
 impossible, but because the prayer for such an in- IN lj,Ronuc- 
 terference would itself be disloyal. For example, it 
 would be positively immoral for us now to pray 
 that the tides or the sun should not rise on a par- 
 ticular day. The corresponding act is represented 
 in the Gospels as suggested by the Tempter. But Matt. iv. 
 as long as the idea of the physical law which rules 5 ~~ ' ' 
 them was unformed or indistinct, the prayer would 
 have been reasonable, and (may we not suppose) 
 the fulfilment also. We cannot act when we feel 
 that our influence is excluded; and may not the 
 converse also be true ? May not all things be 
 possible for us which we firmly hold to be possible, 
 if at least the result would be such as to convey 
 the idea of the personal action of God ? An age 
 records only what it believes; but, in a certain 
 sense also, it does what it believes. 
 
 21. These reflections serve to explain the 
 real force which lies in two remarks on miracles 
 which have at present gained a very wide cur- 
 rency. It is said that ' a belief in miracles de- 
 creases with the increase of civilization'; and, 
 further, that ' our age in virtue of its advanced 
 \ civilization is essentially and inevitably incredu- 
 ' lous of miracles/ Within certain limits both ob- 
 servations are undoubtedly true, but the limits 
 within which their truth is circumscribed exclude 
 
38 Aspect of Miracles 
 
 ggyc- the <h Auctions which are drawn from tliem. The 
 sense of the antecedent likelihood of a miracle 
 proceeds from a comprehensive view of all nature, 
 moral and physical, according to the full develop- 
 ment of the mutual relations of its parts, as con- 
 m i tuting a scheme for us practically infinite. But 
 the necessary condition of all scientific inquiry, 
 arid the progress of science is here assumed to be 
 the test of the progress of civilization, is to put out 
 of sight the indeterminate element in nature, and 
 thus to untamiliarize the mind with those aspects 
 of the world in Which the miracle finds its proper 
 place. And not only so, but the requirements of 
 exact science bind the attention of each student 
 to some one small field, and this little fragment 
 almost necessarily becomes for him the measure 
 of the whole, if indeed he has ever leisure to lift 
 his eyes up to the whole at all. The more inti- 
 mately we are acquainted with any one subject, 
 and the more sensible we become of the fulness of 
 thought which it contains, the less we are fitted to 
 take a due measure of its proper relations to other 
 subjects, or to acknowledge instinctively that the 
 conditions under which we contemplate it are not 
 in themselves absolute. Thus in an inductive 
 laws of observation are treated, and with a view 
 to the immediate results which are sought, treated 
 rightly, as laws of nature. If the moral element 
 
in a Scientific age. 39 
 
 of life — the idea of personality — be neglected, we XNT ^Jg5 uc " 
 cannot of necessity take account of any results 
 which are not entirely physical. For the physical 
 student as such (i. § 10), and for those who take 
 their impressions of the universe solely from them, 
 miracles can have no real existence. Nor is this 
 all: not miracles only, and this is commonly for- 
 gotten, but every manifestation of will is at the 
 same time removed from the world: all life falls 
 under the power of absolute materialism, a con- 
 clusion which is at variance with the fundamental 
 idea of religion, and so with one of the original 
 assumptions on which our argument is based, 
 
 22. While then we admit that the tendency 
 of a scientific age is adverse to a living belief in 
 miracles, we see that this tendency is due not to 
 the antagonism of science and miracle, but to the 
 neglect and consequent obscuration by science of 
 that region of thought in which the idea of the 
 miraculous finds scope. And even here the power 
 of general feeling makes itself most distinctly felt 
 against the power of abstract reason. Exactly 
 when material views of the universe seem to be 
 gaining an absolute ascendancy, popular instinct 
 finds expression now in this form of extravagant 
 credulity, and now in that. Arrogant physicism 
 is met by superstitious spiritualism ; and there is 
 
40 Records of Miracles 
 
 IN ti!! T \ UC " ri S ht on botn sides - Th e harmony of a true faith 
 finds a witness to its fulness in the independent 
 assertion of the antithetic elements which it tem- 
 pers and reconciles. 
 
 23. It is however foreign to our purpose to 
 consider what may be the causes which impress a 
 very distinct character on different cycles of mira- 
 cles, and on the form which the belief in the mira- 
 culous assumes at different periods. The investi- 
 gation itself is full of interest, and contributes in 
 a remarkable degree to illustrate the progrc^ 
 forms of revelation. But for the present we are 
 concerned simply with the possibility of a miracle, 
 which is seen to be included in the idea of a Per- 
 sonal God. Whether the possibility has been 
 realized in the Resurrection still remains for con- 
 sideration ; but the consideration is now open. 
 
 2 1 . For if miracles are neither impossible, 
 nor unnatural, it follows that the records of them 
 cannot be inherently incredible. But on the other 
 hand in proportion as an event is rare, we are 
 s< -ni] m Inns in examining the evidence by which the 
 truth of its occurrence is established; and the 
 more so, if the event itself is such as to be easily 
 misapprehended or referred to wrong causes, or 
 connected with false antecedents or consequents. 
 
not antecedently incredible. 41 
 
 Cases of healing, for example, except under *$iy ihtboduo. 
 peculiar circumstances, cannot be alleged as cer- 
 tainly miraculous (§ 14). Other events are un- 
 equivocal in this respect. The Resurrection is 
 either a miracle or it is an illusion. Here there 
 is no alternative: no ambiguity. It is not an 
 accessory of the Apostolic message, but the sum 
 of the message itself. Its unique character is 
 the very point on which the first teachers of 
 Christianity support all their arguments. It 
 claims to be the opening of a new life to the 
 world. It cannot then.be rightly contemplated 
 by comparing it with the events of common his- 
 tory. It is, according to the original interpre- 
 tation of it, as singular in the history of the whole 
 race of men as birth is in the existence of the 
 individual. In dealing with the evidence adduced 
 in confirmation of such a fact, it is therefore 
 necessary to take into account its relation to 
 preceding and subsequent history ; for it may 
 well happen that the presumption in its favour 
 gathered from the preparation which found its 
 fulfilment in it, and from the results which 
 flowed out of it, will more than counterbalance 
 the natural distrust which is raised at first sight 
 by its exceptional character. On a comprehensive 
 survey of all nature, as far as we can judge from 
 the results which are obtained by a faint approxi- 
 
42 A belief in Miracles 
 
 iktkobuo- mation to such a view, the Resurrection of our 
 Lord, including, as it does, the resurrection of 
 man, may be as natural as events like birth and 
 death, which are accepted as natural, not because 
 we can explain them in any way, but because 
 the range of our experience includes the obser- 
 vation of their constant recurrence. 
 
 25. So far then we have cleared the ground 
 for our inquiry. If we grant the two assumptions 
 which Christianity makes as being a religion for 
 man, there is nothing antecedently improbable in 
 the Apostolic Gospel of the Resurrection considered 
 as miraculous. The same principles which would 
 exclude as impossible a belief in such a miracle 
 as the Resurrection, would equally exclude a belief 
 in anything beyond ourselves and the range of 
 present physical observation. Thus the question 
 practically is not simply Is Christianity true? but 
 Is all hope, impulse, knowledge, life, absolutely 
 bounded by sense and the world of sense? Is the 
 present and the finite the definite limit (not only 
 of the mode but) of the object of human thought? 
 Is each individual personality bounded on both 
 sides 1 Is life as well as science of phenomena 
 only? Is the spirit as well as the understanding 
 confined by present laws of observation not only 
 in the embodiment of ideas but in intuition? Or 
 
and the alternative. 43 
 
 can the soul reach forward to fuller forms of being, in 5Iq2 xjc " 
 not so much future as absolute? Can it, with a 
 consciousness of its divine destiny, look beyond the 
 limits of time? Can it rejoice in feeling what is 
 the glorious part which it has to play in the whole 
 economy of the universe, and regard as its proper 
 heritage a future appearance in the fulness of a 
 
 glorified humanity before the presence of God? 
 
CHAPTER I. 
 THE RESURRECTION AND HISTORY. 
 
 $>i\o<To<f>la 97 'EWrjviKrj olov irpoKadalpet. kclI irpotBlfa ttjv \f/vxyv 
 els irapahoxty Tr/crrews, £<p' 7} tt}v ^vGhjiv iiroiKodoLiei i) &\r)daa. 
 
 CLEMEXS ALEX. 
 
 (hap. 1. 1. TT is the common object of all religion to 
 -*- establish or realize a definite relation be- 
 tween the worshipper and the Divine Being whom 
 he approaches. Christianity goes much further 
 and proposes to reveal the relation between man- 
 kind, or more fully between the world and God, 
 and to restore the original harmony of all crea- 
 John i. 29. tion. It addresses not the individual only, but 
 the race ; its effects are declared to extend not to 
 Epb. i. 10. man only, but to 'all things which are in heaven 
 FhiLiuio anc ^ wn * cn are on earth.' It is universal before it 
 Rom. viii. j g particular. Just as Aristotle taught that the 
 Rot. v. 13. State is prior to the Man, so Christianity claims 
 to address the World before it addresses the Indi- 
 vidual. To use two common phrases, it contains 
 a Philosophy of History, as well as a Philosophy 
 
Life of the World. \&fip 
 
 of Salvation. It disregards nothing in the rich chap. t. 
 development of human life. It takes account 
 alike of the evil and of the good. It refers to final 
 principles — final, that is, for our present powers — 
 the progress which we can observe in societies and 
 nations, and the moral and spiritual education of 
 men, 
 
 2. For all creation is progressive. It is a 
 law as well in the moral as in the physical world 
 that nothing is lost. All that has been modifies 
 all that is and all that will be. The present 
 includes all the past and will itself be contained 
 in the future. Each physical change, each indi- 
 vidual will contributes something to the world 
 to come. The earth on which we live and the 
 civilization which fashions our conduct is the 
 result of immeasurable forces acting through vast 
 periods of time. There are crises in the his- 
 tory of nature and in the history of man, periods 
 of intense and violent action and again periods 
 of comparative repose and equilibrium, but still 
 the continuity of life is unbroken. Even when 
 the old order is violently overthrown the new 
 order is built in part out of its ruins and not only 
 upon them. 
 
 3. The conception of a life of the universe, 
 
4G Life of the World. 
 
 chap. i. of a general law which unites and directs the 
 successive forms of all organized beings, is ne- 
 cessarily of modern growth. It could not be 
 formed till History had called Geology to her 
 aid, and men were familiarized to some extent 
 with the vast space covered by the records of 
 the ancient world. Even now the researches of 
 science are far too limited to do more than sug- 
 gest the idea and mark some salient points in its 
 realization. Yet it is impossible not to feel that 
 it falls in with our general notions of the working 
 of God from whatever source they may be derived ; 
 whether they lie in the original conception of a 
 Divine Being, or are suggested by what we observe 
 in the noblest forms of human action. There 
 is something soothing and elevating in the thought 
 of a scheme of Divine government reaching through 
 all time and space thus opened to our contempla- 
 tion. So far from obscuring the presence of the 
 Creator it enlarges and strengthens our faith in 
 His operation. It teaches trust and hope when 
 we are inclined to be dismayed at what we reckon 
 as immobility or waste in the moral world. The 
 sea- worn cliffs which are once again fashioned 
 before our eyes into records of a new order by 
 the same power through which they were first 
 built up, teach patience with a silent eloquence 
 which would be irresistible if we could enter into 
 
Life of Mankind. 47 
 
 its force. Surely we can afford to wait when God chap, i. 
 works thus slowlv. 
 
 4. The belief in a common life of mankind is 
 of far older date. This is the result of intuition 
 and not of science. It was the teaching of the 
 prophet first and not of the philosopher. If it 
 was permitted to a later generation to see the 
 pledge of a personal immortality in a covenanted Matt. xxii. 
 relation which God granted to the patriarchs, it 3l ~~ 33 ' 
 must have been equally clear at an earlier time 
 that all men who are ' the offspring of God ! were 
 in some degree under His government and work- 
 ing out His will. The exclusiveness of the Jews 
 was something wholly different from the exclu- 
 siveness of the Greeks or Romans. It was based 
 essentially on moral and not on political or social 
 differences. It was religious and not national. 
 The privileges of Judaism were offered to him 
 who accepted the responsibilities and claims of 
 Judaism. The Jew was taught to look forward 
 to the time when all the nations of the earth 
 should worship his God. The triumph towards 
 which he was to strive, was to win fellow-wor- 
 shippers and not to raise himself as a lord 
 over enslaved peoples. Hence the later pro- 
 phets were led to regard 'the kingdoms of the 
 'world' in their relation to 'the kingdom of God/ 
 
4S Connexion of Christianity 
 
 chap, l* of which the Jewish Church was the figure and 
 seed. 
 
 5. Something of the same notion lies in the 
 Eastern representation of the successive ages of 
 the world, which was borrowed by the earliest 
 Greek poets, and again adopted by the writers of 
 the so-called Sibylline books shortly before the 
 Christian era. But the vastness of the scale on 
 which this thought was moulded, deprived it of 
 all practical importance. When transferred to 
 life it expressed at most the contrast which we 
 find in the New Testament between 'this age' 
 and 'the age to come/ Its units, so to speak, 
 were periods, dispensations, as we call them, and 
 not nations. It expressed a far-reaching faith in 
 the general advance of ' the ages ' through distress 
 and disorder towards a glorious end, but it had no 
 connexion with the progress or development of 
 the ■ age ' itself in which we live. 
 
 6. The view which is thus opened to us of 
 the course of history throws a fresh light on the 
 position of Christianity. It is not an isolated 
 system, but the result of a long preparation. 
 According to the teaching of the Apostles, Christ 
 came when all things were ready, and the 
 measure of the appointed seasons was accom- 
 
with the past. 49 
 
 pi i shed. Christianity cannot then be regarded cuw i 
 alone and isolated from its antecedents. It is 
 part of a whole which reaches back historically 
 from its starting-point on the day of Pentecost 
 for nearly two thousand years. It professed to 
 be itself the fulfilment and not the abolition of 
 that which went before : to reveal outwardly the 
 principle of a Divine Fatherhood by which all 
 the contradictions and disorders of life are made 
 capable of a final resolution ; and to possess 
 within it that universal truth which can trans- 
 figure without destroying the various character- 
 istics of men and nations. It is then possible 
 that what we feel to be difficulties in its his- 
 toric form are removed or lessened if we place 
 it in its due relation to the whole life of man- 
 kind ; and, on the other hand, the obvious fitness 
 with which it carries on and completes a long 
 series of former teachings will confirm with sin- 
 gular power its divine claims. 
 
 7. Again: though the birth of Christianity 
 was comparatively late in time, yet in fact # it 
 claims to have existed from the beginning as part 
 of the Divine Counsel. We have seen that we 
 are obliged to regard the purposes and acts of God 
 as following one another, though in themselves all 
 the results of creation simply are, without dis- 
 
 4 
 
50 Connexion of Christianity 
 
 i -map. i. tinction of succession. But even thus the apostles 
 expressly caution us against supposing that the 
 mission of our Lord was in any way an after- 
 thought consequent upon creation. Without touch- 
 ing upon the abstract truth of the absence of tem- 
 poral limitations in the Divine Mind, they teach, 
 what is in this case the practical equivalent, that 
 Ki>h. i. 4 . 'before the foundation of the world' God had fore- 
 lPetl - 20 - ordained the coming of Christ. "We do not at 
 present demand more for this statement than a 
 recognition of its significance. At least it places 
 before us what the first exponents of Christianity 
 believed it to be. It was according to their in- 
 terpretation eternal in its essence, as well as uni- 
 versal in its application. 
 
 > 
 
 8. It follows necessarily from this view of 
 Christianity that it must have been intimately 
 connected with the divine discipline of the world 
 in former ages. As we cannot conceive of the 
 world as abandoned by God, and as the coming of 
 Christ is declared to be the complete expression of 
 ]Jis love, Christianity must have gathered up and 
 ratified either implicitly or by a direct sanction 
 whatever men had truly hoped or learned of 
 Him in earlier times. And this is exactly what 
 our Lord and His apostles professed to do. They 
 came not to destroy but to fulfil: — to lay open 
 
with previous History. 51 
 
 and enforce the spiritual meaning of the Law and chap. r. 
 the Prophets, in which the Jews 'thought that 
 1 they had eternal life;' and to declare to the Gen- 
 tiles the God whom they ' ignorantly worshipped.' 
 They appealed to all history and to the experience 
 of all men in support of the Gospel. Christ came, 
 so St Paul teaches, in the fulness of time, when 
 the due measure of the appointed seasons was ac- 
 complished, each of which was charged with the 
 realization of some part of the Divine Will. God 
 spoke at last to us in the person of a Son (so it Heb.i. 1,2. 
 is written) when He had spoken of old time to 
 our fathers in the prophets, revealing His Counsel 
 gradually (in many parts), as men were able to 
 bear it, and variously (in many ways), as they 
 could best enter into its purport. There have I 
 been attempts in all ages to separate Christianity 
 from Judaism and Hellenism; but to carry out 
 Mich an attempt is to construct a new religion, 
 and not to interpret Christianity. It was bound 
 up (so the Apostles said) with promises and bless- 
 ings by which the Jewish people had been mould- 
 ed through many centuries. It answered to wants 
 of which the Gentiles had become conscious 
 through long periods of noble effort and bitter 
 desolation. It came not at an arbitrary moment, 
 but at a crisis when ' all things were now ready/ 
 If it was divine in its essence, it was no less 
 
 4—2 
 
52 Christianity a 
 
 chap. i. human in the form of its embodiment, and in the 
 circumstances of its reception. 
 
 9. Christianity was connected at its origin 
 with a vast history — with the history of the whole 
 ancient world — and it is also a history itself. It 
 is a history so far as it is a revelation; and it is 
 a history also so far as it is the informing power 
 of modern society. The doctrines of Christianity 
 flow from alleged facts. The belief in the historic 
 event precedes the belief in the dogma. The Life 
 of Christ (if we may use this illustration) comes 
 first, and then the teaching of the Spirit. The 
 substance of our Creed lies in what Christ was 
 and what He did, and not in what He taught. 
 Or, to put the same idea in another way, His 
 teaching was in His Person and in His Life, and 
 not in His words only or chiefly. It is impossible 
 to resolve Christianity into sentiment or morality. 
 The sentiment which it involves springs out of a 
 historical union of man and God : the morality 
 which it enforces is based on the reality and sig- 
 nificance of Christ's Death and Eesurrection. 
 
 I 
 
 10. And yet more than this. From the time 
 of the first preaching of the Apostles, Christianity 
 has been a power in the world acting upon society 
 and acted upon by it. It conquered the Roman 
 
History itself. 53 
 
 Empire, and remained unshaken by its fall. Tt chap. i. 
 sustained the shock of the Northern nations, and 
 in turn civilized them. It suffered persecution 
 and it wielded sovereignty. It preserved the trea- 
 B u res of ancient thought and turned them to new 
 uses. It inspired science, while it cherished 
 mysteries with which science could not deal. It 
 assumed the most varied forms and it moulded 
 the most discordant characters. And all this was 
 done and borne in virtue of its hisj^ric^founda- 
 tion. For its strength lay not in the zeal of a 
 hierarchy who were the depositaries of hidden 
 doctrines, but in the open proclamation of a 
 Divine Saviour. The Cross has remained in 
 every age the symbol and the monument of its 
 power. 
 
 11. These characteristics of Christianity by 
 which it is distinguished from every other religion, 
 even if they are considered only in their most 
 obvious and indisputable form, sufficiently prove 
 that its origin was an event wholly unique and 
 unparalleled in the history of the world. There 
 have been conquerors who in the course of a life- 
 time have overrun half the world and left lasting 
 memorials of their progress in cities and king- 
 doms founded and overthrown. There have been 
 nionarchs who have by their individual genius 
 
54* Christianity centres in the 
 
 chap. i. consolidated vast empires and inspired them with 
 a new life. There have been teachers who through 
 a small circle of devoted hearers have rapidly- 
 changed the modes of thought of a whole genera- 
 tion. There have been religious reformers who 
 by force or eloquence have modified or recon- 
 structed the belief of nations. There have been 
 devotees whose lives of superhuman endurance 
 have won for them from posterity a share of divine 
 honour. There have been heroes cut off by a 
 sudden and mysterious fate, for whose return their 
 loyal and oppressed countrymen have looked with 
 untiring patience as the glorious and certain sign 
 of dawning freedom. There have been founders 
 of new creeds who have furnished to later gene- 
 rations in the image of their work the ideal 
 of supreme good. But in all the noble line of 
 the mighty and the wise and the good, in the 
 great army of kings and prophets and saints and 
 martyrs, there is not one who has ever claimed 
 for himself or received from his followers the title 
 of having in any way wrought out salvation for 
 men by the virtue of his life and death, as being 
 in themselves, and not only by the moral effect of 
 their example, a spring of divine blessings. It 
 is of comparatively little moment how and by 
 whom the Christian religion was first propagated, 
 wonderful and exceptional as that may seem. 
 
doctrine of the Person of Christ. 55 
 
 The one absolute mark by which its establishment chap. i. 
 is distinguished from that of all other systems lies 
 in its very essence. The Gospel differs from every 
 message delivered as from God to men, in that its 
 substance was contained in what befel a Teacher 
 to Whom the Apostles had listened, in what He 
 did and suffered. Christ was Himself the Word 
 and the Truth which He announced. 
 
 12. For us Christianity is so naturally iden* /_ 
 tified with abstract statements of doctrine and 
 ecclesiastical arrangements, that we are in danger 
 of losing sight of the essentially personal basis on 
 which it rests. It requires an effort to realize 
 with any distinctness the sublime originality of a 
 faith not in the might and goodness and love of a 
 Prophet, but in the inherent power and virtue of 
 the Person and Death of a Saviour. The concep- 
 tion of such a faith was equally novel and un- 
 equivocal in the apostolic age. The relation of 
 the Lord to men, viewed simply historically, was 
 set forth as something wholly singular and mar- 
 vellous. Within thirty years after the death of 
 Christ, if we adopt the most extreme views of 
 chronologers, He was habitually mentioned to- 
 gether with the Father as the source of spiritual 
 grace. We need only place any other name for 
 a moment in the same position, if our soul does 
 
56 The origin of Christianity unique, 
 
 chap. i. not revolt from the thought, to feel what must 
 have been the intuitive consciousness of a divine 
 presence which enabled the Apostles to adopt such 
 a formula and to consecrate it for universal use. 
 And the effort is comparatively easy for us, which 
 for them (till it was hallowed by some unquestion- 
 able sanction of God) must have been blasphe- 
 / mous. We are familiarized in theory with the 
 idea of God dwelling as man with men, but a Jew 
 had no such belief to soften the awful grandeur 
 of the truth which he acknowledged. 
 
 13. Exactly in proportion as we apprehend 
 the exceptional (but not unnatural) character of 
 Christianity, we shall be better able to judge of 
 all the phenomena by which (as we believe) it 
 was attended. If it was — and this cannot be 
 denied — wholly original in its fundamental idea, 
 if it effected a revolution in the popular concep- 
 tion of the relation of man to God, if it came to a 
 world prepared to receive but not to create it, if 
 it was bound up with a long anterior history, and 
 has been in turn the life of modern nations, then 
 we may expect to find that the circumstances 
 which attended its origin were themselves also 
 exceptional but not unnatural. The reality of the 
 Resurrection is an adequate explanation of the 
 significance which was attached to the Death of 
 
and so the circumstances of its origin. 57 
 
 3t. It seems impossible to discover anything cuap. i. 
 else which can be. 
 
 14. Nothing, indeed, can be more unjust than 
 the common mode of discussing the miracles of 
 the first age. Instead of taking them in connexion 
 with a crisis in the religious history of the world, 
 disputants refer them to the standard of a period 
 of settled progress. The epoch at which they are 
 said to have been wrought was confessedly crea- 
 tive in thought, and that in a sense in which no 
 other age ever has been, and there seems a posi- 
 tive fitness in the special manifestation of God in 
 the material as in the spiritual world. The cen- 
 tral idea of the time which, dimly apprehended at 
 Rome and Alexandria, found its complete ex- 
 pression in the teaching of the Apostles, was the 
 union of earth and heaven, the transfiguration of 
 our whole earthly nature; and the history of 
 ancient speculation seems to shew that nothing 
 less than some outward pledge and sign of its 
 truth could have led to the bold enunciation of 
 this dogma as an article of popular belief. If, as 
 we have seen, miracles are not in themselves 
 either unnatural or incredible, in this case there is 
 even an antecedent presumption for their reality. 
 
 15. It has been said, and said rightly, though -' 
 
58 Historic tests of Miracles. 
 
 chap. i. the statement has been strangely misunderstood, 
 that science can take no cognizance of miracles. 
 Science deals simply with the ordinary working of 
 God, with what experience shews to be for us 
 laws of nature. It represents the power according 
 to its general action and then assumes it to be 
 . immutable. It cannot from its very nature deal 
 with exceptions which are so rare as not to be 
 capable of being grouped according to our present 
 knowledge. But while miracles do not belong to 
 Science, they belong to History; and if they are 
 not to be rejected without examination, the 
 simple question in each case when they are al- 
 leged is What is the evidence in their favour i Is 
 there anything in the character or work of the 
 time which leads us to expect that God should 
 reveal Himself outwardly as He does inwardly? 
 Is there anything which thus makes miracles in 
 some degree natural events according to the 
 larger sense of the word ? And then Is the special 
 evidence for the miraculous fact as clear as we 
 should be content to act on in ordinary cases ? 
 This is all which we can require; for the neces- 
 sary presumption against a miracle, as an excep- 
 tional occurrence, is removed by an affirmative 
 answer to the former question; and religion is 
 essentially a practical matter. 
 
The Apostolic Age. 59 
 
 16. The position which the apostolic age occu- chap. i. 
 
 3 with regard to the development of ancient 
 life has often been investigated. Yet even thus 
 there are many points in the historic bearing of 
 Christianity which are commonly neglected. It 
 is true that tue can see how the lines of Jewish 
 and Gentile progress converge towards it. It 18 
 true that we can see how it satisfies instincts which 
 found expression more or less vague in earlier ) 
 times. It is true that the Gospel was preached 
 first at an epoch when the organization of society 
 more favourable to its spread than at any 
 other. But this is not all; nor indeed are these 
 essentially the most important features of the 
 preparation by which the Advent was preceded. 
 If this were a complete statement of the case it 
 might be said that Christianity was a natural pro- 
 duct of the concurrence of Rome and Greece and 
 Palestine : that the anticipations of men after 
 periods of eager expectation fashioned for them- 
 selves an imaginary fulfilment : that the circum- 
 stances of the age offer an explanation of the suc- 
 cess of a mere creation of enthusiasm. A full 
 view of the character of the preparation for the 
 Gospel excludes such interpretations of its signifi- 
 cance. There was a tendency towards the central 
 truth of Christianity, but there was no tendency 
 to produce it. Religious speculations had branched 
 
60 The Apostolic Age. 
 
 chap, i. out in so many ways that nothing short of the 
 coming of Christ could have harmonized the vari- 
 ous results to which they led ; but till He came 
 the results were simply conflicting and irrecon- 
 cileable, and even after He came the solution 
 which He brought to the riddles of earlier life 
 was long misunderstood. Philosophers and mora- 
 / lists had variously discussed the destiny of man 
 \ and the grounds of right and duty and knowledge, 
 / but the debates had ended practically in exhaus- 
 tion and despair. The records of their specula- 
 tions shew at once their power and their weak- 
 ness : they reveal what man aspires to know and 
 confess his inability to gain the knowledge for 
 himself. The combination of various nationalities 
 I in the Roman Empire necessarily made broader 
 views of the union of men possible ; but at the 
 same time the triumph of imperialism tended to 
 suppress every independent power. The material 
 advantages which it offered for free intercourse 
 were more .than counterbalanced by the depressing- 
 influence of its overwhelming might. The time 
 was marked by the simultaneous existence of 
 countless adverse powers then first forced into 
 contact, but Christianity bears no trace of any 
 temporal or local character. It came as some- 
 thing wholly new to a world whose course was 
 already run. It belonged to no time and to no 
 
Characteristics of Jewish History. Gl 
 
 place. It was a beginning even more than it was chap i 
 an end. And as there are periods in the indivi- 
 dual life when the exceptional becomes natural, 
 it may be so with that vast and complex pro- 
 gress of humanity, which we are forced equally 
 by instinct and experience to regard under the 
 form of a common life. 
 
 17. The very conception of the history of 
 humanity as a life, which is now an axiom with 
 the conflicting schools, was due (as we have 
 already seen) in the first instance to the Jews. 
 In spite of the exclusiveness of their natural re- 
 ligion they faithfully maintained the belief in a 
 real unity of the human race, out of which the 
 idea of a common life of humanity springs. The 
 Romans had partially witnessed to the truth when 
 they acknowledged the inherent supremacy of 
 Greece in art : the Stoics had taught it as part of 
 their stern theory of the world ; but the Jews held 
 it, however imperfectly, as lying at the very foun- 
 dation of their religion. The promise to which 
 they looked for the pledge of their divine election 
 extended at the same time a heavenly blessing to 
 all nations. The history of Israel was a continual 
 advance towards the realization of this fellowship 
 of nations. Each crisis left the chosen people 
 nearer to that kingdom of heaven of which they 
 
62 Jewish Character 
 
 chap. i. were the sign and the prophets. And the typical 
 prophet of the Captivity looking upon the great 
 powers of the world portrays them at once in 
 Dan.ii.vii. their organic unity, and in the separate complete- 
 ness of their distinctive energies. In this respect 
 it is of no consequence how we interpret the 
 visions of Daniel, or to what date we assign the 
 book which bears his name. The idea of a life of 
 mankind, of a law binding together different mo- 
 narchies and states is there; and from the time 
 when the book became current this idea has been 
 part of the heritage of men. The book of Daniel 
 is (on its human side) the first philosophy of 
 history, even as the book of Genesis is the pledge 
 that such a philosophy is possible. 
 
 18. The long continuance and varied for- 
 tunes of the Jewish nation enabled it to be be- 
 yond any other nation the messenger of unity and 
 progress. And more than this, the purely intel- 
 lectual defects with which the Semitic character 
 is charged fitted the people to perform this their 
 appointed work. The forms of literature which 
 our western training leads us to regard as the 
 highest, the Epic and the Drama, found no place 
 ( among the Jews. The free culture of art among 
 them was forbidden. Or, in other words, they 
 were led to dwell upon the indeterminate and 
 
and History. 63 
 
 infinite and not upon the fixed and limited in the chap, l 
 world. For them all separate histories and lives 
 and embodiments of beauty were incomplete. 
 They were unwilling and unable to see every- 
 where one formula reproducing itself. The whole 
 history of mankind was for them an Epic, a 
 dj — the one Epic, the one Tragedy, of 
 which the fortunes of generations or families or 
 men were but scattered fragments. They looked 
 upon history as a life directed by will, and not as 
 catastrophes ruled by destiny or phenomena pro- 
 duced by law. 
 
 19. Thus it is that the work of the Jews 
 is written on their character. But it is yet more 
 legibly written in their history. It is difficult to 
 say whether their national integrity or their 
 power of assimilation is more surprising. One 
 catastrophe after another overwhelmed them and 
 they rise the same yet nobler from the fire in 
 which they were purified. The old spirit re- 
 mained, but it clothed itself in a new form. The 
 conqueror lived in the conquered. The people 
 fell beneath each of the great forms of ancient 
 civilization and received from each the choicest 
 treasures which it could bestow. 
 
 20. Egypt, Persia, Greece and Rome — the 
 
64? The Discipline 
 
 chap. i. great powers of the East and West — contributed 
 to discipline the mind and further the work of 
 the Jews. The hopes of the people were kindled 
 by times of triumph and chastened by times of 
 captivity. A theocracy, a monarchy, a hierarchy, 
 brought out in succession various sides of their 
 complex character and gave to it solidity and 
 completeness. Meanwhile the spiritual teaching 
 of the nation was carried on from stage to stage, 
 so that while nothing was lost which could serve 
 for the training of the simplest, something was 
 ever added which might elevate the faith of those 
 wlio saw deepest into the divine truth. When 
 the Law, fixed and external, failed to satisfy all 
 the wants which were called out by the manifold 
 growth of a high social civilization, the prophets 
 laid open its inner meaning and drew the outlines 
 of a spiritual kingdom. This new creative period 
 itself came to a close, and the learned diligence 
 of priests and scribes then framed out of the 
 materials which it provided a system which gave 
 definiteness and consistency to the noblest belief 
 of the past throughout a scattered and tributary 
 people. 
 
 21. We are often reminded that the fore- 
 father of the Jews was an Arab Sheikh. Abra- 
 ham, it is true, was a Sheikh, but he was much 
 
°f Egypt- W 
 
 more. His true representative was not the Be- chap. i. 
 d on in Esau, but Jacob, in whom lay the promise 
 of a nation. The fulfilment of this promise was 
 first prepared in Egypt. Without entering in 
 detail into the various influences of Egypt upon 
 the Jews, we may notice this the greatest of 
 all: the descendants of Jacob were there bound 
 together into one body by prosperity alike and 
 by suffering. Every power which goes to con- 
 solidate and unite a people was brought to bear 
 upon them. The recollection of a noble descent, 
 the consciousness of a high destiny, the presence 
 of a hostile nation, common occupations, practical 
 isolation in life and worship, combined to create 
 and keep alive a feeling of fellowship and mutual 
 dependence among the growing host. The sense 
 of unity and nationality may have been degraded, 
 though it could not be destroyed, by the con- 
 ditions of ancient slavery. In this aspect the 
 circumstances of the Exodus are seen in their 
 true light. The voice of the God of their fathers 
 quickened again the true life of the children of 
 Abraham; and the faith which was called out 
 by the sight of terrible judgments on their ene- 
 mies, was deepened with awful intensity by a 
 lonely sojourn in the wilderness in the very pre- 
 sence of the Lord their Saviour. 
 
66 The discipline of Sinai: 
 
 ohap. i. 22. The Jews left Egypt a host of fugitives: 
 they entered the promised land a conquering 
 army. But an entire lifetime lay between the 
 two events. A new generation grew up in the 
 wilderness to whom the Lord revealed Himself 
 as King. Henceforth the people never wholly 
 forgot their divine allegiance. They were the 
 people of the Lord even when they most fatally 
 misinterpreted the meaning of their title. The 
 majesty of Sinai rests on the whole of their later 
 history. The sense of a personal relation of each 
 I Jew to his God gave strength to the nation 
 / and dignity to the citizen. Moses made use, 
 we must believe, of 'the wisdom of the Egyp- 
 * tians/ of their skill in science, in art, in organi- 
 zation, even in sacred symbolism; but the con- 
 ****9 / stitution which he frameo^was infinitely nobler 
 
 than that of Egypt. It was based on the word 
 sJL^L 5 / ' of God addressed to all : it was free from the 
 v » j degradation of caste : it included the possibility 
 of progress. Egypt made the body of the nation, 
 so to speak ; Sinai infused into it its spirit. 
 Egypt united the race : Sinai inspired each man 
 with the consciousness of his own direct covenant 
 with the Lord who had redeemed His people. 
 f Each individual life, in all its parts, no less than 
 / the life of the nation, was consecrated to God. 
 
of the period of the Judges. 67 
 
 To realize the kingdom of heaven — the perfect chap. r. 
 Sovereignty of the Lord among men — was from 
 this time the acknowledged mission of the Jew. 
 
 23. After the conquests of Joshua and the 
 first settlement of the tribes followed times of 
 disruption and disaster. The nation was not yet 
 disciplined sufficiently by common trials to trust 
 in an unseen Power. Hitherto heroic leaders 
 had represented to them the personality of the 
 Theocracy, and momentous crises had called out 
 their utmost energy. But all was changed when 
 they once entered on their inheritance. In times 
 of distress they still remembered that God was 
 their king; but they forgot Him in times of peace. 
 The lessons of the wilderness were not at once 
 applicable to the course of common life. The 
 people acknowledged a spiritual deliverer, but 
 they were not ripe for a spiritual sovereignty. 
 This was indeed the end of their hopes, but the 
 time was not yet. To lead them to look on- 
 ward, to reveal the inherent weakness of domi- 
 nion based on external might, even though the 
 might was from God, to prepare the way for a 
 more gradual training, based upon the instinctive 
 feelings of the nation — in respect of this progres- 
 sive development the type of all nations — was, 
 as it appears, the use of the troubled period of 
 
 5—2 
 
68 The discipline of the Kingdom: 
 
 chap. i. the Judges. The free uncentralized government, 
 and the moveable Tabernacle, shewed by no un- 
 certain symbols the nature of the kingdom which 
 God designed for His people : arbitrary authority 
 and unhallowed sanctuaries shewed that they 
 were not yet prepared to submit to its sway. The 
 idea of the Theocracy, if the phrase may be al- 
 lowed, was presented at the outset of the national 
 life ; and experience proved that it could only be 
 realized by a long season of discipline. 
 
 24. Thus the establishment of the kingdom 
 was in the truest sense a defection from God, and 
 yet, humanly speaking, it was a necessary de- 
 fection. An earthly king fell infinitely short of 
 the type of divine government represented by 
 Moses, or Joshua, or Samuel ; but he was at once 
 a definite centre and a clear sign of something 
 greater than himself. If he presented the spiritual 
 idea in a fixed and limited form, he also gave dis- 
 tinctness to the conception of the present moral 
 sovereignty of God, and furnished imagery under 
 which the prophets could construct a more glorious 
 picture of the future. 
 
 C 
 
 25. The establishment of the kingdom was 
 necessarily connected with the building of the 
 Temple. And the Temple occupied the same 
 
of the Captivity. 69 
 
 place with regard to the Tabernacle as the mon- CITAP - L 
 archy with regard to the Theocracy. Both were 
 earthly and partial, though at the time necessary, 
 representatives of something greater and more 
 spiritual. In both we see the attempt to give a 
 limited and permanent shape to that which was, 
 in its original revelation, divine in essence and 
 transitory in its embodiment. But even as God 
 was pleased to use the monarchy for the exhibition 
 of higher truth, so also He used the Temple ; and 
 we cannot see now how else the lessons conveyed 
 through it to the Jews and to us could otherwise 
 have been realized. 
 
 26. The kingdom and the Temple were de- 
 stroyed when they had fixed indelibly upon the 
 heart of the nation the idea of the unity of the 
 sovereignty and worship of God which they sym- . 
 bolized. The Captivity then spiritualized by the 
 teaching of facts, as the prophets by word of 
 mouth, the lessons which had been taught in a 
 material form. The people came up from Egypt 
 a united nation: they returned from Babylon a 
 small colony to form the centre of a religious 
 commonwealth. A great revolution had been 
 wrought in their national hopes, in their social 
 organization, in their spiritual creed. They were 
 no longer outwardly bound together by civil ties. 
 
70 The Discipline 
 
 i. Subject to different monarchs, they even served 
 in adverse armies. Their hereditary sovereignty 
 was lost. But political separation did not de- 
 stroy true fellowship. The unity of a church suc- 
 ceeded to the unity of a nation ; and the scattered 
 members of the religious society looked forward 
 in common to the eternal kingdom of a future 
 Son of David. At the same time the service of 
 the synagogues grew up around that of the 
 
 S Temple. A hierarchy whose power was derived 
 from education and not from descent, grew up, 
 and more than rivalled the power of the priests. 
 The labour of these scribes witnessed to the ces- 
 sation of prophecy, and jealously guarded the 
 heritage which it had left. As a necessary conse- 
 quence religion assumed a more distinctly per- 
 sonal character. The place of prayer and the 
 . skilled teacher brought it close to the home of 
 each Jew. Exile had taught men, removed from 
 their holy place, the full blessing of spiritual com- 
 munion with God. In the strength of this faith 
 they were allowed to gaze upon the conflicts of 
 good and evil in a higher world; and the enemy 
 of God was seen at length in his personal power. 
 
 27. Thus Persia wrought out its work upon 
 the Jews, and when the discipline was ended the 
 people were prepared to meet the new influences 
 
of the Dispersion. 71 
 
 of Greece. The most abiding monument of the <WAF i. 
 triumphs of Alexander was the city which he 
 chose to bear his name in the border land of 
 the East and West ; and the spirit of Alexandria 
 nowhere found a truer expression than in the 
 Jewish colony which from the first formed an 
 important element in its population. The Alex- 
 andrine Jews penetrated deeply into the specula- 
 tions of Greek philosophy, and their national faith 
 gained breadth without losing its individuality. 
 Nor was the influence of Greece upon Judaism, 
 which was strong at Alexandria, confined to that 
 centre. It was spread from the first more or less 
 throughout Asia Minor and Syria. The policy 
 of conquerors and the instinct of commerce scat- 
 tered the Jews over the whole civilized world. 
 The dispersion, which was begun on the return 
 from Babylon, was extended. Judaism adopted a 
 new language for its ancient doctrines. A people 
 who had once been bound by the strictest ritual- 
 ism within the narrow limits of one land were 
 found throughout all nations witnessing to the 
 spiritual truths which they had inherited and 
 preparing the way for a universal faith. The 
 Hellenists were thus • at once missionaries and 
 prophets. They proclaimed a purer creed to the 
 heathen, who gathered round the synagogue with- 
 out formally taking upon themselves the cove- 
 
72 The Growth of the 
 
 ciiai\ i. nant of Israel; and they lifted the thoughts of 
 their countrymen to the prospect of a spiritual 
 law limited by no requirements of season or place. 
 
 28. One special feature of the growth of Hel- 
 lenism among the Jews demands a passing notice. 
 The spirit of independent thought led to the 
 foundation of sects. The conflicting tendencies 
 which coexist everywhere in religious societies 
 found separate embodiments. Freedom, ritual- 
 ism and asceticism found a characteristic expres- 
 sion in Sadducees, Pharisees and Essenes. The 
 whole breadth and depth of the national faith, so 
 to speak, was tested. Nor was a fiery trial want- 
 ing when the elements of truth and error were in 
 danger of being fatally confounded. The Macca- 
 bsean conflict restored the Law to its true supre- 
 macy while it left untouched all that was nobler 
 in the lessons of Greek art and culture. A final 
 struggle fixed the limits of the teaching of the 
 ancient prophets, and founded the stability of the 
 nation on the victorious profession of its completed 
 faith. 
 
 29. Meanwhile through these vicissitudes of 
 disaster and triumph one faith grew in many 
 fashions and in many parts. The Jews never lost 
 the sense of the blessing which was to come 
 
doctrine of Messiah 73 
 
 through them to all the nations. Up to the chap. i. 
 giving of the Law no personal trait of the pro- 
 mised Redeemer is found. Hope was centered in a 
 narrower circle at each great crisis in the spiritual 
 history of mankind, in a race, in a nation, in a 
 tribe. For the first time the work of Moses fur- 
 nished occasion to a special portraiture of Mes- 
 siah's office. He was to be the mediator of a new 
 Law. To establish an abiding covenant between 
 God and man was declared to be the substance of 
 his work. The Law alone was unable to train 
 bhe Jews to their appointed work. A kingdom 
 was established, and with it a new conception of 
 siah was added The king who gave unity 
 and security to the nation was but a type of 
 the Son of David whose kingdom should extend 
 in eternal blessings over all the world. The 
 earthly sovereignty of the line of David fell. The 
 chosen people passed into captivity, and under the 
 pressure of national disaster learnt from the teach- 
 ing of prophets to see in their promised Messiah 
 ' the Son of Man/ who should sympathize with 
 the sufferings of those whom He came to save as 
 well as to govern. Thus the central belief, in 
 virtue of which Judaism lived, was providentially 
 shaped in the progress of the history of the chosen 
 people. Nothing was lost as the conception of 
 the Redeemer was gradually completed. Each 
 
7'J? The doctrine of Messiah : 
 
 chap. i. period added something which belongs essentially 
 to the fulness of the conception. And so at last 
 the Lawgiver, the King, the Prophet, the Priest, 
 the Man, are all included in the Christ whom 
 the Gospels present to us. 
 
 30. Two characteristic doctrines which be- 
 longed in their completest forms respectively to 
 Palestine and Alexandria summed up this na- 
 tional belief at the time of the Lord's Coming. 
 The expectation of a Messiah ' who should redeem 
 1 Israel/ and the belief in a Divine Word by whom 
 God could reveal Himself to mankind at large. 
 The first hope found expression in a series of 
 so-called apocryphal writings which generally 
 agree in describing a period of intense suf- 
 fering, followed by the advent of a triumphant 
 Conqueror, who should bring beneath his sceptre 
 and the Law all the nations of the earth. The 
 process of the consummation is variously pictured 
 according to the position in which the several 
 writers stood. At one time an era of blessing, at 
 another an era of vengeance fills the imagination 
 of the seer. But the earth is the scene of both. 
 ) The purification of the soul through suffering, the 
 end of the great tragedy of human life, finds no 
 fitting place in the schemes of outward aggran- 
 dizement. ' The master of Israel' was startled at 
 
of the Word. 75 
 
 the seeming paradox of a second birth. In pro- chat, i 
 portion as the teaching of the prophets was made 
 more definite, its traits were exaggerated and 
 externalized. But in spite of error and prejudice 
 the hope of the Palestinian Jew was in a Person, 
 a Saviour. The deliverance for which he con- 
 fidently looked was to be wrought out among 
 men. It was to be historical in its foundation 
 and not moral only or intellectual. He through 
 whom it should be accomplished was recognized 
 as ' the Son of God,' but none the less its* end was 
 to be the restoration of the kingdom. 
 
 31. At the same time when this external 
 conception of Messiah was gaining definiteness 
 ami strength, wider views of the general action 
 of God were gradually opened. Religious think- 
 ers, especially in Egypt, pondered on the way in 
 which we may conceive an Infinite Being in con- 
 nexion with the finite. The result was a wide- 
 spread doctrine of a Divine Word through whom 
 God was supposed to be revealed in action and in 
 utterance. In Palestine this Word was regarded 
 chiefly as the medium of outward communica- 
 tion, like the angel of the Pentateuch: at Alex- 
 andria as the power in virtue of which a fellow- 
 ship between God and man is rendered possible. 
 'The one doctrine tended towards the recogni- 
 
7G The doctrine of the Word, 
 
 chap. i. tion of a divine Person subordinate to God: the 
 other to the recognition of a twofold personality 
 / in the divine nature/ In Greek writers, like Philo, 
 the conception of the Word was further enlarged by 
 the ambiguity of the term Logos, which was used 
 to express it. As this might be taken for ' Word ' 
 or 'Reason/ so the corresponding idea fluctuated 
 between the objective manifestation of the Divine 
 will and the subjective correlative, whether in the 
 mind of God in which the primal thought lay, or 
 in the mind of man by which he apprehends the 
 revelation. Each varying notion has obvious 
 points of connexion with Christian dogma, and 
 just as the Jewish belief in Messiah preserved 
 the belief in a historic Saviour, so the Jewish 
 belief in the Word prepared the way for a larger 
 view of a revelation of God in man and through 
 
 32. The two complementary conceptions of a 
 Saviour manifested on earth and of an eternal om- 
 nipresent Word thus existed side by side, but they 
 were absolutely unconnected. ' Philo may have 
 conceived of the Word as acting through Messiah, 
 but not as one with Him. The lines of thought 
 which pointed to the action of a second Person in 
 the Godhead, and to the victories of some future 
 conqueror, was not even parallel but divergent/ 
 
The preparation of the Gentile world. 77 
 
 It was reserved for St John to unite the antithetic chap ;. 
 truths in one divine phrase, which could not have 
 entered into the mind of Philo. ' The Word was J° hn *• 
 * God,... and the Word was made flesh, and dwelt 
 1 among us/ 
 
 33. But the preparation of Judaism was not 
 the only preparation for Christianity. In another 
 sense the Gentile world were making all things 
 ready for the advent. The vast monarchies of 
 the East, the intellectual culture of Greece, the 
 civil organization of Rome, each fitted men in 
 some peculiar way for the reception of the message 
 of the Gospel. The spirit of the East made itself 
 felt directly through the Jewish nation while 
 prophets yet spoke to interpret its lessons. The 
 teaching of Greece was reflected more or less 
 clearly in the common version of the Sacred 
 Books and in the speculations of an influential 
 school of Jewish teachers, both in Palestine and 
 in the Dispersion. The material unity and order 
 of the Roman Empire prepared the way for the 
 spread of a new Faith. But it is not our purpose 
 now to consider the relative effects of Greece or 
 Rome on Judaism or Christianity, but rather to 
 estimate generally what ancient life in its noblest 
 forms was in itself as a step in the progress of 
 humanity. 
 
78 The development 
 
 chap. i. 34. Something, indeed, has been said already 
 
 of the direct influence of Greece upon Jewish de- 
 velopement. But the independent progress of 
 classical thought and life had in itself, though 
 indirectly, a more important bearing on the con- 
 summation of the crisis of human life at the time 
 when Christ came. In a word, it may be said 
 that the history of the ancient world is generally 
 the history of the gradual separation of man from 
 God, so far as the original relation was the ground- 
 work of faith and personal devotion. The idea of 
 Imperialism is the human antithesis to the Ho- 
 meric sovereignty of Zeus. It would be easy to 
 trace out the necessary progress of this elimination 
 of the heavenly, externally religious, element from 
 Gentile life in society, literature, and thought. 
 The instinct from which this element derived its 
 origin and strength could not bear a rigid analy- 
 sis, nor meet the manifold difficulties of a com- 
 plex polity. Step by step the patriarchal com- 
 munities, in which the ruler and the priest were 
 one, passed into the great republics, where a so- 
 lemn ceremonial witnessed to a feeling of reli- 
 gion, powerful only as an instrument to rule the 
 masses. A single century, but that a century 
 which ranks in the richness and variety of its 
 mental results only after the first and sixteenth, 
 saw the passage from the pious theocratic history 
 
of Greek life. 79 
 
 of Herodotus to the self-reliant, human analysis chap. i. 
 of national fortunes in Thucydides, from the aw- 
 ful questionings on fate and foreknowledge, and 
 future punishment in ^Eschylus, which sound like 
 echoes of a Hebrew prophet, to the self-complacent 
 intellectualism of Euripides, from the rude choric 
 song, m which still lingered some sense of the 
 personal bounty of a God of gladness, to the con- 
 ventional portraiture of an artificial life in the 
 comedies of Menander. The advance of philoso- 
 phy was scarcely less rapid. The discussions on 
 being, which occupied the earliest thinkers, passed 
 into discussions on knowing. Aristotle sums up 
 tlio results of all who had gone before him with 
 stern impartiality, and a school of scepticism fol- 
 lowed. Thenceforth philosophy was content to 
 treat of duty and to abdicate the higher preroga- 
 tives which it had once claimed. 
 
 35. The growth of the Roman Empire is the 
 noblest spectacle of the natural triumph of human 
 power, as it was based upon the surest of human 
 affections. But like Greek philosophy the Roman 
 constitution contained essentially in itself the 
 seeds of its own ruin. The conception of the 
 family bound together by a common worship on 
 which the state was built was unequal to meet 
 the difficulties of enlarged dominion. First arose 
 
80 The development 
 
 chap. i. the divisions in the capital itself when the pater- 
 nal authority of those who had been once fathers 
 in act as well as in name was unable to satisfy the 
 wants of the multitude who had placed themselves 
 under their protection. Next the policy of iso- 
 lation and civil independence, by which the early 
 republic had sought to keep in contented loyalty 
 her subject states, was inapplicable to the wider 
 dominion of later times. The idea of the family 
 and with it that of religion was lost; and when 
 Rome had conquered the world, it was felt on 
 every side that one irresponsible will could alone 
 wield the resources of the state. The soul was 
 gone when the body had reached its full develop- 
 ment. Yet even thus the influence of Rome upon 
 Christianity was not less than that of Greece. If 
 the speculations of Greek thinkers had raised 
 problems and fashioned a language which could 
 aid Christian teachers in unfolding the doctrine of 
 the Divine Nature, the determinations of Roman 
 jurists were equally powerful in preparing for the 
 exhibition of the relation of man to God, whicli 
 was the office of the Latin Church. But this work 
 was still future and unperceived. For the pre- 
 sent even the splendours of the reign of Augustus 
 were a sign of failure. Greek speculation had 
 ended in scepticism. The constitutional liberty 
 of Rome had issued in Imperialism. The pro- 
 
of Roman life. 81 
 
 mise which the Jew had inherited from his fathers chap. i. 
 alone awaited for an accomplishment, which each 
 change seemed to bring nearer. 
 
 36. Thus the fulness and the exhaustion of 
 hope met at the epoch of Chrises coming. The 
 hope of an external deliverance which had been 
 gradually moulded through a long history was 
 waiting its fulfilment. The hope which man had 
 formed of working out his own way to truth and 
 freedom was wellnigh quenched. Old forms of 
 belief, old modes of government, were passing 
 away. It was felt that the world's great age was 
 even then to begin anew. Carried away by this 
 belief, Romans saw in the rise of Imperialism the 
 promise of a Golden Age. But the imagery of 
 the Augustan poet, who described the advent of 
 this glorious time, was borrowed from the East, 
 and it was to the East that many still looked for 
 the great Conqueror. So firm and so widespread 
 was this expectation that nearly seventy years 
 afterwards Vespasian was thought to have ful- 
 filled the prophecy by passing from Syria to the 
 throne of the Caesars. It is needless however to 
 dwell upon this instinctive homage of the age to 
 the Lord whom it knew not. It may have been 
 a mere echo of Jewish hopes, or one of those 
 intuitive interpretations of a great crisis which 
 
 6 
 
82 Revealed Religion 
 
 chap. i. seem to rise simultaneously in the hearts of na- 
 tions. So much at least is clear to us now that 
 the Coming of Christ coincided with the beginning 
 of a new life in mankind, with a new development 
 of history which is not yet completed ; and, yet 
 more than this, that the principles of this life are 
 found in their simplest form in the Gospels. 
 
 37. Judaism had existed in the face of every 
 form of antagonistic religion, but it had not sub- 
 dued them. It had the power of life, but not the 
 power of conquest. The life of Christianity lay 
 in progress. It was essentially aggressive and es- 
 sentially human. Christ was the Son of Man as 
 well as the Son of David. And thus through the 
 Apostles first all the treasures of the East were 
 brought to the western nations in a form which 
 they could appreciate and accept. The strength 
 of modern civilization lies in the combination of 
 faith and reason — to use the shortest phrase — 
 which was the issue of their message. The power 
 of their Gospel was felt far beyond the range of 
 its acknowledged influence. The old philosophies 
 were quickened with a new life. Christianity had 
 revealed the seat of their weakness, and enthusi- 
 astic teachers endeavoured to supply what was 
 wanting in them. Classical paganism itself was 
 made to assume a new dress, and the bitterest 
 
progressive. 83 
 
 enemy of the faith acknowledged its inherent ciiap. i. 
 power by a vain endeavour to transfer its spirit 
 to the polytheistic creed. 
 
 38. It has been said that while science is 
 progressive religion is stationary. The modes of 
 advance in the two are certainly not the same, 
 but the advance in science is not more real than 
 the advance in religion. The advance in religion 
 is not measured by an addition to a former state, 
 which can be regarded in its fulness separately, 
 but by a change : it is represented not by a com- 
 mon difference but by a common ratio. Viewed in 
 this light, we can trace on a great scale the triple 
 division of post-Christian history as marked by 
 the successive victories of the Faith. The fact 
 of the Resurrection is its starting point, the real- 
 ization of the Resurrection is its goal. The ful- 
 ness of the Truth is once shewn to men, as in 
 old times the awful splendours of the Theocracy, 
 and then they are charged to work out in the 
 slow struggles of life the ideal which they have 
 been permitted to contemplate. Thus it is that 
 we can look without doubt or misgiving upon 
 the imperfections of the sub-apostolic Church or 
 the corruptions of the middle ages or the excesses 
 of the Reformation. Even through these the 
 divine work went forward. The power of the 
 
 6—2 
 
84 Religion progressive. 
 
 chap. i. Resurrection was ever carried over a wider field. 
 At first Christianity moved in the family, hallow- 
 ing every simplest relation of life. This was the 
 work of the primitive Church. Next it extended 
 its sway to the nation and the community, claim- 
 ing to be heard in the assemblies of princes and 
 in the halls of counsellors. This was the work of 
 the mediaeval Church. Now it has a still wider 
 mission, to assert the common rights and fellow- 
 ship of men, to rise from the family and the nation 
 to humanity itself. To accomplish this is the 
 charge which is entrusted to the Church of the 
 Present ; and no vision of the purity or grandeur 
 of earlier times should blind us to the supreme 
 majesty of the part which is assigned to us in 
 the economy of faith. 
 
 39. It is at once obvious that these great 
 divisions of Christian history, or even more truly 
 speaking of the post- Christian world, answer in a 
 remarkable degree to the periods of Jewish his- 
 tory which have been already marked out. The 
 law of progress is the same in both. But if his- 
 tory repeats itself, it is, at least in this case, on 
 an ampler field and with more momentous issues. 
 The discipline of a nation is replaced by the dis- 
 cipline of a world; and (as we believe) an Advent 
 of Triumph answers to an Advent of Redemp- 
 
The Greek Period: Orthodox. 85 
 
 tion. Without following out this parallel further, chap. I 
 though it seems to include many unexpected har- 
 monies in things old and new, we must yet notice 
 a progress in Christianity itself corresponding 
 with this progress in its work. The three words 
 which by common consent characterize the great 
 representative churches of the different periods 
 describe the successive stages into which it 
 may be divided, Orthodoxy, Catholicity, Evangeli- 
 calism. 
 
 40. At first the Christian Faith was simply 
 historic. As long as its work was confined in the 
 narrow limits of the family or the small commu- 
 nities scattered throughout the Empire, consider- 
 able latitude in interpreting the fundamental 
 facts on which it rested was natural or even ne- 
 cessary. The principles of Truth were held firm, 
 but no deductions from them were authorized. 
 The rapid spread of Christianity through every 
 rank made this state of things impossible for any 
 great length of time. Philosophers became Apo- 
 logists and they reasoned in turn upon the truths 
 which they defended. Yet even thus heresy was 
 long active in every direction laying down false 
 conclusions before the Church assumed the peril- 
 ous function of defining the Truth. But the 
 work was done by those who by natural gifts 
 
8G The Greek Period, 
 
 chap. i. and intellectual training were best fitted for its 
 accomplishment. It was the glory of the Greek 
 Church to win the title of Orthodox. But the 
 work of the Orthodox Church though necessary 
 was full of danger. There is a strange fascination 
 in reasoning on mysteries. As the argument pro- 
 ceeds men are unwilling to limit their conclu- 
 sions, and they end too often by measuring Being 
 by our conceptions of it. But yet more than 
 this : Doctrine itself is external to us. There is 
 no right doctrine which ought not to affect con- 
 duct, but as doctrine it has no necessary effect 
 on life: no conquering or transforming power. 
 The Orthodox Church is the least inclined of all 
 churches to missionary work. Orthodoxy as such 
 is the translation of facts into a dialectic form; 
 but the life remains in the facts. Unhappily the 
 Greek Church from the time when its great mis- 
 sion was fulfilled was united with Imperialism. 
 Its potential dangers were thus realized, and 
 Mohammedanism conquered the East. It has 
 been said that the Byzantine Empire died of 
 Christianity: it would be more just to say that 
 the Byzantine Empire sought to imperialize 
 Christianity and perished in the attempt, for 
 Greek Christianity was strong enough only to 
 rescue itself and not the State from the ruins of 
 the judgment which followed. 
 
The Soman Period: Catholic. 87 
 
 41. But meanwhile a greater Church had chap, l 
 risen. When Constantine transferred the dignity 
 of Empire to his new capital he was unable to 
 bear away to Byzantium the ancient glory and 
 name of Rome. The majesty which had grown 
 round the City during a thousand years remained 
 undisturbed as the prize of the power which 
 should prove worthy to claim it. And the Roman 
 Church was alone able to bear the weight of 
 sovereignty, for she alone had life amidst the 
 shadows which lingered round the ancient seats 
 of honour. From the first, if we can interpret 
 rightly its fragmentary records, the Roman Church 
 had adopted something of the policy of the 
 State. It had regarded ecclesiastical problems 
 from the point of view of society. Its character- 
 istic was breadth rather than precision. In pro- 
 portion as it embodied more and more openly 
 the style and power of the Caesars Catholicity 
 became more conspicuously its ruling principle. 
 Its aim was to incorporate rather than to assi- 
 milate the people who were brought under its 
 control. The Republic received the gods of con- 
 quered nations within its Pantheon, and the 
 Church accepted under new titles whatever po- 
 pular belief or superstitions could be clothed in 
 a Christian dress. From its position and from its 
 inherent character the Roman Church became a 
 
88 The Roman Period. 
 
 chap, l sovereign power. At Constantinople the attempt 
 was made to imperialize the Church: at Rome 
 the Church became an Empire. The transforma- 
 tion was subservient if not essential to the fulfil- 
 ment of its work. By the glory of its name and 
 the strength of its organization it conquered the 
 northern tribes and preserved the treasures of 
 ancient civilization for a nobler use. Its function 
 with regard to discipline was as needful as that 
 of the Greek Church with regard to Truth. But 
 at the same time the traditional policy which 
 was its strength prepared the way for its corrup- 
 tion. When the Church became nobler outwardly 
 it engrossed more completely the devotion of its 
 members, and conversely it became more de- 
 pendent on popular opinion. At last the Chris- 
 tian was in danger of losing his sense of a per- 
 sonal connexion with Christ; and the simplicity 
 of Truth was hidden beneath the accretions of 
 centuries. The spirit of Northern Europe, which 
 had never been completely Romanized, had in 
 the meantime gained maturity, and claimed in 
 the full consciousness of life to hold communion 
 with God face to face. 
 
 42. Thus a third development of the Church 
 began corresponding to a new period of life; but 
 it differed from those which preceded by the fact 
 
7%6 Evangelical Period, \W* 9 ' #£ 
 
 that it was manifold and not one. It was eS^n- - CUAr - r 
 tially the expression of individual faith and no^Q^VIii. 
 of common belief. Its ecclesiastical forms fol- 
 lowed from the concurrence of private convictions, 
 and did not underlie and mould the societies 
 which arose. Its strength lay in the confident 
 affirmation of two great principles, that the Chris- 
 tian is continuously in direct spiritual intercourse 
 with God through Christ, and that he is throughout 
 continuously responsible to Him for his judgment 
 in divine matters. Personal vitality was infused 
 into religion. Faith claimed the homage of free 
 reason. Individuality was added to Catholicism. 
 
 43. It would be easy to point out the weak- 
 ness of the Eeformation in itself as a power of 
 organization. Its function was to quicken rather 
 than to create, to vivify old forms rather than to 
 establish new. But however we may grieve over 
 its failure where it arrogated the office not of re- 
 storation but of reconstruction, it was a distinct 
 advance in Christian life. Where it failed, it failed ■ 
 from the neglect of the infirmities of man and 
 of the provisions which have been divinely made 
 to meet them. On the other hand, the lessons 
 which it taught are still fruitful throughout 
 Christendom, and destined, as we hope, to bring 
 forth a still more glorious harvest. What that 
 
90 The successive periods 
 
 chap. i. may be as yet we cannot know, but all past 
 history teaches us that the power of the Gospel 
 is able to meet each crisis of human progress, 
 and we can but look forward with trust to the 
 fulfilment of its message to our age. The advance 
 towards that perfection of Christian fellowship 
 which we can all imagine, and to look forward to 
 which is our noblest hope, may be slow, but it is 
 slow only in the same sense in which the life of 
 nations is slow. Generations are the days by 
 which it is measured, but in the end it will not 
 fail. The parable of nature is fulfilled in the 
 history of the Church. 
 
 44?. The student of history will readily see 
 that the great forms of Christian progress which 
 have been marked out correspond in a remarkable 
 manner with other great periods in art and litera- 
 ture and science. The divisions are neither arbi- 
 trary nor partial. The final result of each was a 
 permanent advance, and the life by which each 
 was animated was drawn from the Gospel. If the 
 fact of the Kesurrection be in itself, as it confess- 
 edly is, absolutely unique in all human experi- 
 ence, the point which it occupies in history is 
 absolutely unique also. To this point all former 
 history converges as to a certain goal : from this 
 point all subsequent history flows as from its life- 
 
mark an advance. 91 
 
 giving spring 1 . If the Resurrection were alleged to CHAP - l - 
 have occurred abruptly in the middle of a series of 
 events which passed on slowly to their consumma- 
 tion unaffected by its interruption ; if it stood in 
 no definite relation to the past, as in some sense a 
 solution of the riddle which had baffled exhausted 
 nations : if its significance had not been witnessed 
 to at once by the rise of a new and invincible 
 power which fashioned the development of all 
 aftertime : then we might have paused in doubt 
 before so stupendous a miracle, and pleaded the 
 uniformity of nature against the claims of such an 
 event upon our belief. But now the testimony of 
 nature itself is in favour of the fact. We form 
 our notions of a result from what we know of the 
 conditions under which the forces act, no less 
 
 1 Tert. de Yirg. Vel. I. Nihil sine aetate est: omnia tempus 
 expectant.... Aspice ipsam creaturam paulatiin ad fructum, pro- 
 moveri. Granum est primo, et de grano frutex oritur, et de 
 frutice arbuscula enititur. Deinde rami et frondes invalescunt, 
 ct totum arboris nomen expanditur : inde germinis tumor, et 
 flos de germine solvitur, et de flore fructus aperitur. Is quoque 
 rudis aliquamdiu et informis paulatim aetatem suam dirigens 
 eruditur in mansuetudinem saporis. Sic et justitia (nam idem 
 Deus justitiae et creaturae) primo fuit in rudimentis, natura 
 Deum metuens. Dehinc per legem et prophetas promo vit in 
 infantiam. Dehinc per evangelium efferbuit in juventutem. 
 Nunc (the words admit a Catholic interpretation) per Paracletum 
 componitur in maturitatem ... I should despair of rendering the 
 words adequately into English. As a master of rhetorical lan- 
 guage the ■ barbarian ' Tertullian has few rivals. 
 
92 The Special Evidence 
 
 chap. i. than from what we know of the forces themselves. 
 If the force is the same we are sure that it must 
 act differently under varied circumstances. If 
 the circumstances are absolutely singular in all 
 experience we conclude that an event will occur 
 without a parallel. If a long train of occurrences 
 before and after lead us to expect that the event 
 would be of some specific kind, then its singu- 
 larity is an argument in favour of its credibility 
 and not against it. On a large view of the life of 
 humanity the Resurrection is antecedently likely. 
 So far from being beset by greater difficulties 
 than any other historical fact, it is the one fact 
 towards which the greatest number of lines of 
 evidence converge. In one form or other pre- 
 Christian history is a prophecy of it and post- 
 Christian history an embodiment of it. 
 
 45. If we next turn to consider the direct 
 evidence for the Resurrection, we shall find in it 
 several elements of singular force. These are the 
 more deserving of attention, because the narrative 
 of the event itself in the Gospels, is in no wise dis- 
 tinguished from the narrative of any other ordi- 
 nary fact which they record. The Evangelists 
 treat the Resurrection as simply, unaffectedly, 
 inartificially, as everything else which they touch. 
 The miracle to them seems to form a natural part 
 
for the Resurrection. 93 
 
 of the Lord's history. They shew no conscious- CHAP - '• 
 ness that it needs greater or fuller authentication 
 than the other events of His life. Their position 
 and office indeed excluded such a thought. They 
 wrote not to create belief but to inform those 
 already believing. A knowledge of the chief events 
 in the Lord's ministry, including the Resurrec- 
 tion, and a general conviction of their reality 
 and significance, is everywhere assumed in the 
 apostolic writings. The existence of a Christian 
 society is the first and (if rightly viewed) the 
 final proof of the historic truth of the miracle on 
 which it was founded (§§ 49, 50). It may indeed 
 be said that the Church was founded upon the 
 belief in the Resurrection, and not upon the 
 Resurrection itself: and that the testimony must 
 therefore be limited to the attestation of the be- 
 lief, and cannot reach to the attestation of the 
 fact. But belief expressed in action is for the 
 most part the strongest evidence which we can 
 have of any historic event. Unless therefore it 
 can be shewn that the origin of the Apostolic 
 belief in the Resurrection, with due regard to 
 the fulness of its characteristic form, and the 
 breadth and rapidity of its propagation, can be 
 satisfactorily explained on other grounds, the be- 
 lief itself is a sufficient proof of the fact. We 
 shall be in a position to consider whether such an 
 
94 The witness 
 
 chai\ i. explanation is possible when we have examined 
 the form in which the outward record of the be- 
 lief has come down to us. 
 
 46. The letters of St Paul are amongst the 
 earliest, if not actually the earliest writings in the 
 New Testament. Of these one important group 
 has been recognized as certainly genuine even 
 by the most sceptical critics. No one doubts that 
 the Epistles to the Corinthians, Galatians, and 
 Eomans were composed by St Paul, and addressed 
 to the Churches whose name they bear. Nor is 
 there much uncertainty as to the date at which 
 they were written. The most extreme opinions 
 fix them between A.D. 52 — 59, that is under no 
 circumstances more than thirty years after the 
 Lord's death (A.D. 30 — 33). There can then be 
 no doubt as to the authority of their evidence as 
 expressing the received opinion of Christians at 
 this date, and there can be no doubt as to the 
 opinion itself. In each of the Epistles the literal 
 fact of the Resurrection is the implied or ac- 
 knowledged groundwork of the Apostle's teaching. 
 The very designation of God is ' He who raised 
 c up the Lord from the dead/ In this miracle lay 
 the sum of the new revelation, the sign of Christ's 
 Sonship. To believe this fact and confess it was 
 the pledge of salvation. On many points there 
 
of St Paul 95 
 
 was a diversity of judgment among the Apostles, CIIAP - L 
 and a wider discrepancy of belief among their 
 professed followers, but on this there is no trace 
 of disagreement. Some, indeed, questioned the 
 reality of our own resurrection, but they were 
 met by arguments based on the Resurrection of 
 Christ which they acknowledged. Whatever else 
 was doubted this one event was beyond dispute. 
 
 47. Moreover the fact itself was treated histo- 
 rically and not ideally. It was not regarded as the 
 embodiment of a great hope, or as a consequence 
 of some pre-conceived notion of the Person of 
 Christ. On the contrary, the hope was expressly 
 rested on the fact; and the apostolic view of the 
 nature of Christ is deduced from His rising again. 
 (§§ 56 ff.) In one place St Paul has given an 
 outline of ' the Gospel ' by which men ' were saved/ i Cor. xv. 
 1 1 delivered unto you first of all that which I also 
 1 received, how that Christ died for our sins accord- 
 ing to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, 
 1 and that He rose again the third day, according 
 'to the Scriptures: and that He was seen of Ce- 
 'phas, then of the twelve. After that He was 
 1 seen of above five hundred brethren at once, of 
 ' whom the greater part remain unto this present, 
 ■ but some are fallen asleep. After that He was 
 1 seen of James; then of all the Apostles. And last 
 
96 The witness 
 
 chap. i. ( of all He was seen of me also, as of one born 
 'out of due time... Therefore whether I or they, 
 1 so we preach, and so ye believed.' Nothing can 
 be more simply historic. What we call the mira- 
 culous facts are placed beside the others without 
 any difference. The Resurrection of the Lord, 
 and His appearances after the Resurrection, are 
 taught as events of the same kind essentially, and 
 to be received in the same way as His Death and 
 Burial. Together they formed 'the Gospel;' and 
 in this respect, whether it was ' the Three/ or St 
 Paul who preached, the substance of their preach- 
 ing was the same. 
 
 48. Of 'the five hundred' to whom Christ 
 appeared many were still alive when St Paul 
 wrote. So too were most of the Apostles, who 
 were their fellow-witnesses, as well as St Paul 
 himself. Thus we stand, as it were, in the direct 
 presence of the immediate witnesses of the fact. 
 But it has been said that the very circumstance 
 that St Paul reckons the appearance revealed to 
 himself in the same list with the other appear- 
 ances, shews that he did not insist on their ob- 
 jective reality: they may have been merely sub- 
 jective visions as this is assumed to be. The 
 exact converse is, however, the true explanation 
 of the fact. St Paul believed, and always acted 
 
of St Paul 97 
 
 as if he believed, that the Lord did appear in chap. i. 
 His human nature as really to him as to the 
 other witnesses of the Kesurrection. He asserts 
 that all the appearances were equally actual, that 
 is, external manifestations of the Lord, but not 
 that they were all like in circumstances. There 
 was an objective reality in the revelation of Christ 
 made to him no less than in the revelations to 
 others; but this objective reality was not limited 
 to one outward shape. It was apprehended (as it 
 appears) variously by various minds. Thus we 
 find that the forms of the Lord's manifestation 
 were, according to the Evangelists, most varied 
 (n. § 17). A marvellous change had passed over 
 Him. He was the same and yet different. He 
 was known only when He revealed Himself. 
 He conformed to the laws of our present life, and 
 yet He w r as not subject to them. These seeming 
 contradictions were necessarily involved in the 
 moral scope of the Resurrection. Christ sought 
 (if we may so speak) to impress on His disciples 
 two great lessons, that He had raised man's body 
 from the grave, and that He had glorified it. 
 Nor can we conceive any way in which these 
 truths could have been conveyed but by appear- 
 ances at one time predominantly spiritual, at an- 
 other predominantly material, though both were 
 alike real For the same reason we may suppose 
 
 7 
 
98 The witness 
 
 chap. i. that the Lord took up into His glorified Body 
 the material elements of that human body which 
 was laid in the grave, though, as we shall see 
 (ii. § 6), true personality lies in the individual 
 law which rules the organization in each case, 
 and not in the actual but ever changing organi- 
 zation, which may exist at any moment 1 . The 
 resumption of the Crucified Body conveyed to 
 ordinary minds a conception which could not 
 otherwise easily be gained, while at the same 
 time it brought the fact of the Resurrection 
 within the reach (as far as could be) of continuous 
 observation. For us the appearance to St Paul 
 would certainly in itself fail to satisfy in some 
 respects the conditions of historic reality — it 
 might have been an internal revelation — but for 
 him it was essentially objective and outward 2 ; 
 and when taken in connexion with his life and 
 the other appearances which he records, it lays 
 
 1 This consideration will help to explain a difficulty which 
 has been felt as to the appearances of the Lord after the Resur- 
 rection. His dress (it has been said) must have been purely sub- 
 jective. But a little reflection will shew that the special outward 
 forms in which the Lord was pleased to make Himself sensibly 
 recognizable by His disciples were no more necessarily connected 
 with his glorified Person than the robes which he wore. 
 
 It is important to observe that on another occasion St 
 Paul notices the doubt which he felt as to the objective charac- 
 ter of the revelation which he received : u Cor. xii. i ff. 
 
of the Apostles. 99 
 
 open something more of the Divine fulness of the chap, i 
 exalted Manhood of the risen Saviour. 
 
 49. It is unnecessary to dwell longer on St 
 Paul's direct testimony to the "Resurrection, which 
 is thus carried up to the time of his Conversion, 
 that is to a date not more, at most, than ten 
 years after the Lord's death. No one probably 
 will deny that the Resurrection was announced 
 as a fact immediately after the Passion. No- 
 thing else will explain the origin of the Chris- 
 tian Church. We may go even further, and take 
 for granted that the Apostles who announced it, 
 believed in its reality. The life of St Paul may 
 be considered conclusive on this point; and even 
 if his life were explicable on any other theory 
 than that of a faith which he claimed to share 
 with the other Apostles, it is long since a critic 
 has been found to maintain that the miraculous 
 narrative was an intentional fiction of those by 
 whom it was promulgated. It remains then, if 
 the Resurrection be unhistoric, that they were 
 deceived, and if so, that they were predisposed to 
 a credulous and ill-grounded belief, either by 
 their own character, or by the popular expecta- 
 tions of the time. 
 
 50. Before examining whether this was so 
 
 7—2 
 
100 No predisposition to 
 
 chap. i. we may observe how incredible it is from the 
 nature of the testimony alleged that the Apostles 
 could have been deceived. The sepulchre in which 
 the Lord had been laid was found empty. This 
 fact seems to be beyond all doubt, and ia one 
 where misconception was impossible. On the 
 other hand, the manifestations of the Risen Sa- 
 viour were widely extended both as to persons 
 and to time. St Paul, and in this his record is 
 in exact accordance with that of the Evangelists, 
 mentions His appearances not only to single wit- 
 nesses, but to many together, to 'the twelve* 
 and to 'five hundred brethren at once/ One 
 person might be so led away by enthusiasm as to 
 give an imaginary shape to his hopes, but it is 
 impossible to understand how a number of men 
 could be simultaneously affected in the same 
 manner 1 . The difficulty of course is further in- 
 
 1 It must be observed that the question here is not as to 
 the propagation of a belief in a statement through a large num- 
 ber of men, but as to the simultaneous perception by many of 
 an alleged phenomenon. The former is intelligible even if the 
 belief be in fact unfounded : the latter is not intelligible un- 
 less the phenomenon be really objective. In this connexion too 
 it is most instructive to notice that the report of the Lord's 
 Resurrection was in each case disbelieved. Nothing less than 
 sight convinced those who had the deepest desire to believe the 
 tidings ; and even sight was not in every case immediately con- 
 vincing (Matt, xxviii. 17). See [Mark] xvi. 9—11, 13, 14. 
 Luke xxiv. 11, 13, 22—24. John xx. 25. In St Matthew the 
 
believe in the Resurrection. 101 
 
 creased if we take account of the variety as well chap. i. 
 as of the number of the persons who were ap- 
 pealed to as witnesses of the fact during their 
 lifetime; and of the length of time during which 
 the appearances of the Lord were continued. 
 It is stated in the Acts that the necessary quali- 
 fication of an Apostle was that he should be a 
 personal witness of the Resurrection; and St 
 Paul admits the qualification, and shews that it 
 was fulfilled in bis case. Every avenue of delu- 
 sion seems to be closed up. For forty days Christ 
 was with the disciples talking with them of the 
 things pertaining to the kingdom of God. If we 
 cannot believe that the Apostles deceived others, 
 it seems (if possible) still more unlikely that they 
 were the victims of deception. 
 
 51. For there was no popular belief at the 
 time which could have inspired them with a faith 
 in an imaginary Resurrection. There was, it is 
 true, a popular belief that Elijah, or some other of 
 the old prophets, should be sent from heaven, whi- 
 ther they had been specially withdrawn ; but this 
 
 promised sight of the Lord is the message of joy which the 
 women are to carry to the disciples: xxviii. 7, 10. In St Luke 
 the contrast between the effects of the report of the appearance 
 of the Lord and the sight of Him is vividly given: xxiv. 34, 35, 
 compared with 36 ff. 
 
102 The Resurrection not 
 
 ' I:u> % belief had no real connexion either in its ground 
 or in its scope with the Resurrection of Christ, as 
 preached by the Apostles. It centred in a direct 
 mission from God and not in a rising from the 
 grave to a new life : it culminates in the accom- 
 plishment of a work among men, and not in the 
 elevation of humanity to heaven. After the death 
 of John the Baptist, again, some said 'that he 
 1 was risen from the dead ' when they heard of the 
 works of Christ, but this was simply the interpre- 
 tation of a report in connexion with the opinion 
 that John was indeed Elias. Nothing was based 
 upon the conjecture. Others, again, in the course 
 of the Lord's ministry were, according to the 
 Evangelists, restored to life, but this restoration 
 was to a mortal and not to an immortal life. 
 Such a resurrection, so far from being a parallel 
 to the Resurrection of Christ, is the very opposite 
 to it. The belief in the resuscitation of the dead 
 to the vicissitudes of ordinary life would indispose 
 for the belief in a rising to a life wholly new in 
 kind and issue. And such is the life of the Risen 
 Lord which is portrayed in the Gospels. Thus 
 while we admit all the records of resuscitation 
 contained in the Scriptures, there is absolutely 
 not the slightest anticipation in all earlier his- 
 tory of such a Resurrection as that of Christ. 
 The conception as expressed by the Evangelists 
 
anticipated by popular belief . 103 
 
 and Apostles has itself the characteristics of a chap, i 
 Revelation. 
 
 52. But it may be said that the idea was in- 
 cluded in that of Messiah. There were it is true 
 very vivid anticipations of a coming Messiah, of 
 some triumphant King who should restore the old 
 glories of the house of David, but the path which 
 was marked out for Him by common consent was 
 that of victory and not of defeat and death. 
 There is no evidence that the Jews in our Lord's 
 time had formed any conception of a suffering 
 Messiah. If Christ spoke of His Passion as the 
 Son of Man, they could only ask with wonder, 
 Who this Son of Man was ? If the Prophet de- 
 scribed a deliverer, despised and afflicted, the 
 question rose to their lips whether ' He spoke 
 \ of himself or some other.' And if the idea of 
 Messiah's death was unknown, so also was that of 
 the Resurrection, which is the complement of it. 
 
 53. Nor were the disciples in this respect 
 more far-seeing or better instructed than their 
 countrymen. On this point the Gospels are an 
 unexceptionable authority; and nothing is more 
 striking than the apparent inability of the Apo- 
 stles, who were nearest to the Lord, to lay aside 
 the hopes in which they had been reared. When 
 
104- The effects of the Resurrection 
 
 chap. i. the Lord was raised from the dead they under- 
 stood at last what He had said to them, but not 
 
 Matt xvi. before. The thought of His death was one which 
 ai — 23. 
 
 they felt ought to be cast aside as a temptation to 
 
 Luke xxiv. distrust. And when at last He died, their hope 
 
 * as gone. There is not a word to indicate that 
 
 this catastrophe led them to any truer view of 
 
 His work. Those who loved him most devotedly 
 
 came to embalm his corpse. The first tidings of 
 
 His Resurrection seemed as 'idle talk;' and the 
 
 Evangelists paint in vivid colours, the strangeness 
 
 of whieli proves them to be faithful, 'the slow- 
 
 1 ness' and ' hardness of heart/ which hindered the 
 
 disciples from believing a fact which brought 
 
 with it a revolution of their ancient faith. 
 
 54. But the revolution was accomplished. If 
 we compare the portraiture of the Apostles as 
 given in St Luke's Gospel with that in his book 
 of the Acts, we cannot but feel that we are look- 
 ing on the same men, but transfigured in the 
 latter case by the working of some mighty in- 
 fluence. There are the old traits of individuality, 
 but they are ennobled. The relation in which 
 the disciples stand to their Lord is not less per- 
 sonal, but it is less material. He is regarded 
 as their Saviour as well as their Teacher. What 
 was before vague and undecided is defined and 
 
on the character of the Apostles. 105 
 
 organized. Those who when Christ was yet with chap. i. 
 them wavered in spite of their love for Him, 
 mistook His words, misunderstood His purpose, 
 forsook Him at His Passion, after a brief interval 
 court danger in the service of a Master no longer 
 present, proclaim with unfaltering zeal a message 
 hitherto unheard, build up a society in faith on 
 His Name, extend to Samaritans and Gentiles 
 the blessings which were promised to the people 
 of God. However we explain it the change is 
 complete and certain. Their whole moral nature 
 was transformed. As far as we can see there was 
 no spring of hope within them which could have 
 had such an issue. The anticipations which they 
 shared with their countrymen and those which 
 the immediate presence of Christ had awakened, 
 were dissipated by His death. Whatever new 
 impulse moved and animated them must have 
 been from without, clear, and powerful It must 
 have been clear, to make itself felt to men who 
 were in no way predisposed to yield to it : power- 
 ful, to remould once and for ever their notions 
 of the work of Messiah. The Resurrection satis- 
 fies both conditions. As a fact with which the 
 disciples were familiarized by repeated proofs it 
 was capable of removing each lingering doubt : as 
 a Revelation of which the meaning was finally 
 made known by the withdrawal of Christ from 
 
10G The effects of the Resurrection 
 
 tli, it opened a new region and form of 
 life, the apprehension of which would necessarily 
 influence all their interpretations of the Divine 
 promises. If the crucified Lord did rise again, we 
 can point to effects which answer completely to 
 what we may suppose to have been the working 
 of the stupendous miracle on those who were 
 the first witnesses of it: if He did not, to what 
 must we look for an explanation of phenomena 
 for which the Resurrection is no more than an 
 adequate cause ? 
 
 65. In nothing is the spiritual transformation 
 Of the Apostles more striking than in their view 
 of the Person of Christ. The words in which He 
 spoke of the atonement which He should make 
 necessarily fell unheeded by those who could not 
 realize the fitness of His Death. There is nothing 
 in the Gospels (and for this we may fairly quote 
 them) to shew that personal deliverance from sin 
 and corruption — the transfiguration of all man's 
 natural powers — was ever connected with His work 
 Johnxii. by those who heard Him. ' These things,' it is 
 Luke xviii. emphatically said, 'understood not His disciples 
 94- < at the first/ He received sinners, it is true, but 
 
 it was not felt that their restoration was a type 
 of the restoration of all men. Still less, if possi- 
 ble, is there any indication that the Apostles un- 
 
on the belief of the Ajiostles. 107 
 
 derstood before the Resurrection that the Blood 
 of Christ should ratify a new Covenant to be em- 
 bodied in a Universal Church. The meaning of 
 the Last Supper was hidden from them, as subse- 
 quent events shewed, till after the Lord's Death. 
 But then, from some source or other, a flood of 
 light is seen to have been poured on all which 
 they had regarded with silent and hesitating 
 wonder. The first invitation which they addressed 
 to those who had joined in the Crucifixion was 
 ' to be baptized into the name of Jesus Christ for 
 'the remission of sins/ The day of Pentecost 
 sealed the testimony of Easter. And from that 
 time forth union with Christ by baptism was the 
 first condition of Apostolic fellowship. His name 
 was declared to be the 'only name under heaven 
 'given among men whereby we must be saved.' 
 His Passion was acknowledged as part of the di- 
 vine counsel. His Return was set forth as the 
 certain object of the believers hope. Nor are we 
 left in doubt as to the power which had wrought 
 the change. The ground on which the Apostles 
 rested their appeal was the Resurrection : the 
 function which they claimed for themselves was 
 to bear witness to it; Their belief was not an 
 idle assent, but the spring of a new life. And 
 the belief itself was new in kind. It was not 
 like that affectionate credulity with which an 
 
108 The fact of the Resurrection 
 
 oppressed state or party believes in the reappear- 
 ance of a lost leader. It was a confession of error 
 before it was an assertion of faith. It involved 
 a renunciation of popular dogmas in which those 
 who held it had been reared. It proclaimed a 
 truth altogether new and unlike any which men 
 had held before (§51). If ever the idea of de- 
 lusion can be excluded, it must be in a case when 
 it is alleged to explain a conviction which trans- 
 formed at once the cherished opinions of a large 
 body of men of various character and power, and 
 forced them to a painful and perilous work for 
 which outwardly they had no inclination or 
 advantages. 
 
 56. If we look a little deeper at the Apostolic 
 -faith we shall feel still more strongly the effect of 
 the belief in the Resurrection. To do this we 
 must turn to the Epistles of St "Paul, as the 
 earliest memorials of Christian teaching addressed 
 to Christians; for hitherto we have noticed only 
 the simple message addressed to mixed and un- 
 believing hearers. In many respects, as we might 
 naturally expect, there is a wide difference be- 
 tween the contents of these two forms of the Gos- 
 pel; but their groundwork is identical. The fuller 
 and more developed doctrine of St Paul is as essen- 
 tially historical as the first address of an Evange- 
 
XX. 
 
 as the basis of St Paul's teaching. 109 
 
 list to Jews or Gentiles. This has been pointed 
 out already (§§ 44 ff.) ; but one most important ele- 
 ment of faith which St Paul brings out from the 
 history remains yet to be considered. In the first 
 addresses of the Apostles reported in the Acts the 
 Death of Christ is treated rather as a difficulty to 
 be explained, than as a spring of blessing. If we 
 realize the circumstances under which they spoke, 
 it could not be otherwise, and this peculiarity 
 alone justifies us in assuming that the narrative 
 is in the main authentic. But St Paul in writing 
 to Christians (and no less in speaking to Chris- c.^. Acts 
 tians) treats this fact very differently. The Death 
 of Christ — the mode and the issue of that Death 
 — is the centre round which all his doctrine turns; 
 for to the Christian the Death of Christ involves 
 the Resurrection. 'I determined not to know 
 1 anything among you/ he says to the Corinthians, 
 i save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified/ ' God for- 
 'bid/ he writes in another place 'that I should 
 1 glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ/ 
 And the reason is obvious; since the Death of 
 Christ for the Christian includes the whole mys- 
 tery of the Redemption. The Resurrection is 
 necessarily involved in it, when we acknowledge 
 that He who died was the Son of God. Thus the 
 great Epistles to which we confine ourselves 
 abound with such passages as the following: 
 
110 The fact of the Resurrection 
 
 9HAP. i. 'Christ gave Himself for our sins/ 'We are not 
 
 Gal. i. 4. < our own . we we re bought with a price/ ' If 
 
 so, 'one died for all, then all died... Behold all things 
 
 i* t 18. ' 'have become new. But all things are of God, 
 
 'who reconciled us to Himself through Jesus 
 
 Rom. v. 8, 'Christ/ 'God commendeth His love towards us, 
 
 ' in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for 
 
 'us. Much more then, being now justified by 
 
 ' His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through 
 
 'Him/ 
 
 57. With these passages are connected others 
 which present the same truth in different points 
 
 1 Cor. viii. of view. Thus : 'To us there is one God, the 
 'Father, of Whom are all things, and we unto 
 ' Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through Whom 
 
 Rom.xii.5. 'are all things, and we through Him/ And 
 again : ' We being many, are one body in Christ, 
 
 Gal.iii.s6, 'and every one members one of another/ We 
 ' are all the children of God by faith in Christ 
 'Jesus... There is neither Jew nor Greek, there 
 'is neither bond nor free, there is neither male 
 ' nor female : for (we) are all one in Christ Jesus/ 
 Or, in other words, Christ, as He is revealed to 
 us, in His Life, His Death, His Resurrection, is 
 the One Mediator by Whom every blessing comes ; 
 the one all-containing Presence by Whom men 
 are bound together. In His Person every differ- 
 
as the basis of Christian teaching. Ill 
 
 ence of race, of station, of nature, is done away. chap, i, 
 i In Christ/ to use the favourite phrase of the Rom. vii. 
 
 r 2 ; i Cor. 1. 
 
 Apostle, our whole life and being and work are 30; Rom. 
 centred. 
 
 58. Long familiarity with such words has 
 made it very difficult for us to realize the magni- 
 tude of the revelation which they convey. The 
 fitness of the doctrine to satisfy the wants of men 
 makes us inclined to believe that it is natural. 
 But if we place on the one side the outward cir- 
 cumstances of Christ's Death, and on the other 
 these interpretations of its significance : if we 
 measure what seemed to be the hopeless ignominy 
 of the catastrophe by which His work was ended, 
 and the Divine prerogatives which are claimed for 
 Him, not in spite of, but in consequence of that 
 suffering of shame ; we shall feel the utter hope- 
 lessness of reconciling the fact and the triumphant 
 deduction from it without some intervening fact 
 as certain as Christ's Passion and glorious enough 
 to transfigure its sorrow. For we must ever bear 
 in mind that the Apostles do not deal with ab- 
 stract doctrine, but with doctrine centred in facts. 
 They do not teach a redemption to be wrought 
 out by each man for himself, after the example of 
 Christ, but of redemption wrought for each by 
 Christ, and placed within their reach. They do 
 
112 The fact of the Resurrection 
 
 chap i. not teach merely an original union of men, but a 
 union accomplished in the Person of Christ. They 
 do not teach a liberty which sets aside the dis- 
 tinctions and duties of society, but a liberty which 
 springs from the transformation of every claim oi 
 life into a spontaneous act of filial love through 
 the revelation of the Father in His Son. They 
 do not teach an immortality of the soul as a con- 
 sequence flowing from any conceptions of man's 
 essential nature, but a resurrection of the body 
 not only historically established in the rising again 
 of Christ, but given to us through Him who is 
 1 the Resurrection and the Life/ If Christ rose, 
 to repeat the alternative which we have proposed 
 ImIoiv, all this is intelligible. The miracle was aa 
 ft Hew-birth of humanity. If Christ did not rise, 
 we have not only to explain how the belief in His 
 Resurrection came to be received without any pre- 
 vious hopes which could lead to its reception; 
 I but also how it came to be received with that in- 
 tensity of personal conviction which could invest 
 the Life and Person of Christ with attributes never 
 before assigned to any one, and that by Jews, who 
 had been reared in the strictest monotheism. 
 
 59. There is yet one other aspect in which 
 we may see the power of the early faith in the 
 Resurrection. Next to the fact that Christ rose 
 
witnessed by the constitution of tlie Church. 113 
 
 from the dead, the topic most frequently insisted CIIAP - l - 
 on in the Apostolic writings is that He will come 
 again from heaven. It would be out of place to 
 discuss the form which this belief took, or the in- 
 terpretation of the passages of the Epistles in 
 which it is enforced. One point only may be 
 noticed. The material imagery in which the be- 
 lief was popularly embodied shews in what sense 
 the Resurrection itself was understood. In pro- 
 portion as the Return of Christ was apprehended 
 in a definite outward shape, so also must His 
 Departure have been held to have taken place 
 in the same manner. The two events were com- 
 pletely correlative. The fact of the Resurrection 
 explains the confident expectation of Christ's 
 Second Coming in the mode in which the early 
 Christians looked for it. 
 
 60. The same also may be said of the Apos- 
 tolic interpretation of the Sacraments. It has 
 been frequently argued that the Christian doc- 
 trine of the Sacraments corresponds with the 
 Christian doctrine of the Incarnation. It could 
 be shewn that it is equally closely connected, 
 though the correspondence is necessarily less 
 complete, with the fact of the Resurrection. Rut 
 it does not fall within our scope to examine the 
 essential conception of a Sacrament. It is enough 
 
 8 
 
Hi Tlie witness of the Sacraments. 
 
 chap. i. to observe that the external forms in which the 
 conception was realised witness to the transform- 
 ing power of the belief in the fact of Christ's 
 rising again. The belief in the Resurrection 
 which was the groundwork of the Church . pene- 
 trated every part of its faith and worship. The 
 Bam. Ep. earliest Christians kept 'the eighth day for joy, 
 I5 ' 'as that on which Jesus rose from the dead;'... 
 
 and the two rites which were of universal ob- 
 servance commemorated not obscurely the same 
 central fact. The celebration of the Holy Eu- 
 charist is absolutely unintelligible without faith 
 i Cor. xi. in a risen Saviour. ' As often as ye eat this bread 
 ' and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death 
 'till He come/ The rite was not a memorial 
 of death simply, but of death conquered by life. 
 Rom. iv. The seal of the efficacy of the death of Christ 
 ** was given in the Resurrection; and the limit of 
 
 the commemoration of His Passion w r as looked 
 for in His Return. Baptism, again, was regarded 
 as embodying the teaching of the same facts: 
 Rom. vi. 4. 'We are buried with Him by baptism unto death: 
 ' that like as Christ was raised up from the dead 
 ' by the glory of the Father, even so we also should 
 'walk in newness of life/ So thoroughly was 
 the faith in the Resurrection of Christ inwrought 
 into the mind of the first Christians that the 
 very entrance into their society was apprehended 
 
Summary. 115 
 
 under the form of a resurrection. The fact was CHAP - V 
 not an article of their creed, but the life of it. 
 It was confessed in action as well as in word. 
 And no evidence of the power or reality of a 
 belief can be less open to suspicion than that 
 which is derived from public services contempo- 
 raneous with its origin and perpetuated through- 
 out the body which holds it. 
 
 61. To sum up briefly what has been said. 
 It has been shewn that the Resurrection is not an 
 isolated event in history, but at once the end and 
 the beginning of vast developments of life and 
 thought ; that it is the climax of a long series of 
 Divine dispensations which find in it their com- 
 plement and explanation : that it has formed the 
 starting-point of all progressive modern societies, 
 ever presenting itself in new lights according to 
 the immediate wants of the age. It has been 
 shewn that in the character of the fact there is 
 nothing which can appear incredible or, in such 
 a connexion, even improbable to any one who 
 believes in a Personal God. It has been shewn 
 that the direct evidence for the event is exactly 
 of the same kind which we have for the other 
 events in the Life of Christ ; that St Paul appeals 
 to his own experience and to the experience of the 
 Apostles for the certainty of its literal accomplish- 
 
 8—2 
 
116 Summary of the 
 
 chap. i. ment ; that it is incontestable that the Apostles 
 acted from the first as if they believed it, and 
 that their sincerity cannot be doubted ; that the 
 nature of the outward proof alleged seems to 
 render it impossible that they could have been 
 victims of a delusion ; that the substance of their 
 belief was something wholly novel, removed 
 equally from the belief in a phantastic vision, and 
 from the belief in a restoration to a corruptible 
 life ; that the effects of it were such upon them- 
 selves that the conviction must (so to speak) have 
 been forced upon them by overwhelming power, 
 capable of changing their personal character, of 
 transforming their hereditary faith, of inspiring 
 them with new thoughts and hopes; that the 
 Christian Church was founded upon the belief, 
 and embodied it in rites coeval with its founda- 
 tion. Nothing has been said of the testimony of 
 St John, and St Peter, and the first three Evan- 
 gelists, lest exception might be taken to their au- 
 thority. Every conclusion has been rested upon 
 documents which criticism has never assailed. 
 But at this point we may take account of the 
 evidence from other sources. The common con- 
 tents of the Synoptic Gospels can be shewn (I 
 believe) to be anterior to the Epistles of St Paul, 
 and to contain the sum of the earliest Apostolic 
 preaching in Judaea; if this be so we have in 
 
evidence for the Resurrection. 117 
 
 them the testimony not of one witness only, but chap. i. 
 the common testimony of most of those who saw 
 the Lord after He rose again. The authenticity 
 of the first Epistle of St Peter cannot be ques- 
 tioned without the most arbitrary neglect of ex- 
 ternal evidence, and in that the Apostle to whom 
 Christ first shewed Himself speaks of Him as 
 ' foreordained before the foundation of the world, l Peter l - 
 
 20, 21. 
 
 'but (made) manifest in these last times for 
 ' (those) who by Him do believe in God, that 
 'raised Him up from the dead, and gave Him 
 1 glory ; that (their) faith and hope might be in 
 ' God.' The Gospel of St John, again, seems to 
 me an indubitable work of the disciple whom 
 Jesus loved; and after recounting some of the 
 appearances of the Lord after His Resurrection, 
 the Evangelist completes his Gospel, as it stood 
 originally, with the words : ■ Many other signs John xx. 
 1 truly did Jesus in the presence of His disciples, ' 
 1 which are not written in this book ; but these 
 ' are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is 
 'the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing 
 'ye might have life through His name/ 
 
 Indeed taking all the evidence together, it is 
 not too much to say that there is no single his- 
 toric incident better or more variously supported 
 than the Resurrection of Christ. Nothing but 
 the antecedent assumption that it must be false 
 
118 Summary. 
 
 chap. i. could have suggested the idea of deficiency in the 
 proof of it. And it has been shewn that when it 
 is considered in its relation to the whole revela- 
 tion of which it is a part, and to the conditions of 
 the divine action, which we have assumed, this 
 miraculous event requires a proof in no way dif- 
 fering in essence from that on which the other 
 facts with which it is associated are received as 
 true. In a word, the circumstances under which 
 God is said to have given a revelation to men in 
 the Resurrection of the Lord Jesus were such as 
 to make the special manifestation of power likely 
 or even natural; and the evidence by which the 
 special Revelation is supported is such as would 
 in any ordinary matter of life be amply sufficient 
 to justify our acting in the full belief of the con- 
 clusion to which it leads. 
 
 If we next turn from History to the Individual 
 man, it will appear that the Resurrection throws 
 as much light on the mysteries of personal life as 
 it does on the whole progress of mankind. 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 THE RESURRECTION AND MAN 
 
 C'est un des grands principes du Christianisme, que tout ee qui 
 est arrive & Jssus-Christ doit se passer dans Vdme et dans le 
 corps de chaque Chretien. 
 
 PASCAL. 
 
 1. "1 JITHERTO we have considered the Resur- cn.\r 
 
 J--L rection simply as a fact, the central point 
 of universal history, the outward cause of revolu- 
 tions in thought and in society. It still remains 
 to analyse the essential meaning of the fact in re- 
 ference to the individual, to discover, if it may be, 
 what are the special lessons as to our nature and 
 destiny of the Revelation which it contains. Some 
 of these we have indeed already touched on in 
 considering the views of our Lord's Person and 
 Work which were presented by the Apostles after 
 He rose from the dead (i. §§ 55 ff.). But we may go 
 yet further, and consider the relation of the Resur- 
 rection, accepted as a fact, to some of the great 
 problems of life, apart from the earliest historical 
 interpretation of its teaching. 
 
120 Final elements of Life. 
 
 chap. ii. 2. That we may do this in any way satisfac- 
 torily, it is necessary that we should go back for 
 a moment to take account of the simplest elements 
 to which the questions which are involved in the 
 discussion can be reduced. It appears then that 
 we are conscious of three distinct existences, Self, 
 the World, and God. We cannot prove the real- 
 ity of these existences as we have already seen 
 (Intr. § 4) ; but on the other hand in some form 
 or other all our life testifies to our conviction that 
 they are. It is impossible to hold that Self is 
 the only true being or self-existent : it is equally 
 impossible to hold that Self is the only manifes- 
 tation of the Being on which it depends. Thus 
 we are forced to accept that mystery as final, 
 which represents as essentially distinct, yet for 
 us in inseparable juxtaposition, on one side the 
 Creator, on the other Creation, of which the in- 
 dividual l Y is a part. 
 
 3. If again we look at that which we each 
 call /, it will be seen to be essentially twofold. 
 There is an organism, and something which acts 
 through the organism. There is a unity of will 
 with a multiplicity of functions. There is an ele- 
 ment of permanence in the midst of constant 
 change. There are laws and a power which 
 makes itself felt in accordance with these laws. 
 
The constitution of the Individual. 121 
 
 The organism, with all its variety of sense, its chap, n 
 capacity for service, its laws of decay and assimi- 
 lation, we call the body: the self-moving power, 
 which originates and controls action we call the 
 soul. And this twofold being is naturally influ- 
 enced by a twofold affinity. On the one side, 
 through the 'body,' it is connected with the 
 world: on the other, through the 'soul/ with 
 God. Or in other words the body is inherently 
 finite, the soul aspires at least towards the infi- 
 nite. To sum up what has been said briefly: 
 consciousness reveals to us in ourselves indivi- 
 dually a fundamental antithesis corresponding to 
 the antithesis which we are forced to recognize 
 without us. 
 
 4. Yet more the I consists in this antithesis. 
 Nothing is more common than to hear it assumed 
 that the ' soul' is the real self. Yet nothing can 
 be more clear upon reflection than that the only 
 'self of which we are conscious is made up of 
 'soul* and 'body.' The workings of these two 
 are absolutely inseparable. We cannot contem- 
 plate the independent action of either for an 
 instant. If we try to do so, we find at the outset 
 the presence of some condition or power which is 
 due to the complementary part in our whole 
 nature. One remarkable proof of this duality (so 
 
122 The problems of human life. 
 
 chap. ii. to speak) in our life — of all that we are, as far as 
 we can observe ourselves — may be found in the 
 fact that some speculators have seen in life nothing 
 but the manifestation of the one element, and 
 others nothing but the manifestation of the other, 
 since the demonstrable presence on every occa- 
 sion of either taken alone seemed to exclude the 
 presence of the other. Nor is there, indeed, any 
 possible refutation of the 'materialist' or 'spi- 
 ritualist' systems except in the appeal to the in- 
 dividual consciousness. 
 
 5. Thus we find ourselves face to face with 
 two great personal problems : What' is the perma- 
 nent relation of soul and body? and next What is 
 the relation of the complex self to God ? in which 
 latter question is included the mystery of sin. To 
 these may be added one other question, not per- 
 sonal but yet inevitable to man: What is the 
 relation of the individual self to the world ? In 
 other words Shall we be hereafter? and, if so, 
 What shall we be? and What is the destiny of 
 creation generally ? Round these three ques- 
 tions the noblest thoughts of the ancient world 
 turned: to these the most daring speculations 
 of later times have been addressed. What light 
 is thrown upon them by faith in the Resurrec- 
 tion? 
 
Elements of Personality. 1 23 
 
 G. Our present personality, as we have seen chap. ii. 
 (§ 3), involves the antithesis of soul and body. 
 One element is not more needful to it than the 
 other. Indeed, the clearest conception which we 
 can form of a person is the special limitation of 
 a self-moving power. The mode of the limita- 
 tion, including the original laws by which it is 
 governed, and the special acts by which the effects 
 of these laws are modified, expresses the differ- 
 ences of personality, and presents to the mind an 
 easy method of conceiving of the change of cha- 
 racter in the same person, and likewise of the 
 continuous effect of soul and body upon one an- 
 other while the body is in constant flux. For 
 us the body is the outward expression of the 
 limitation in each particular case. For we cannot 
 understand by body simply a particular aggre- 
 gation of matter, but an aggregation of matter 
 as representing in one form the action of a par- 
 ticular law. The specific law of assimilation and 
 combination is that which is really essential and 
 permanent. The same material elements may 
 enter into a thousand bodies, but the law of each 
 body, as explained above, gives to it that which 
 is peculiar to and characteristic of it. To take 
 an illustration from Chemistry. The same ele- 
 ment, pure carbon for instance, can exist in forms 
 wholly different. This difference we represent to 
 
124 There is no reason to suppose that the 
 
 chap. ii. ourselves under the idea of some peculiar law of 
 arrangement of the similar particles in each case. 
 And conversely we can conceive how if the con- 
 stituent element were changed the action of the 
 different laws of arrangement (supposed to con- 
 tinue) would produce substances truly answering 
 to those which resulted from their action before. 
 In other words we can understand how the law 
 which at present rules the formation of our body 
 may find its realization hereafter in some other 
 element (so to speak), while the new body will 
 be essentially the same as the old one, as express- 
 ing the corresponding action of the same law in 
 relation to the new sphere in which it may be 
 supposed to be placed. All the forms of being 
 would thus be changed and each body would be 
 changed harmoniously with the remainder and in 
 due proportion to the whole. 
 
 7. This consideration will help us in exa- 
 mining on grounds of simple reason the question 
 of the permanence of our personality after death. 
 This, as far as we can see, can happen only in 
 two ways. It may be argued that the soul after 
 death will itself have a personal existence; or 
 that it will continue to act through an organiza- 
 tion (where the word is used in its widest sense) 
 which is itself the expression of the same law as 
 
Soul separate from the Body is x>ersonal. 125 
 
 moulds all that we now call our body. These cn.uv u 
 alternatives must be considered separately. 
 
 8. First then on principles of reason there 
 seems to be no ground whatever for supposing that 
 the soul as separate from the body is personal 1 . 
 There is indeed an imperious instinct which 
 affirms that we shall survive death, but this in- 
 stinct does not attempt to analyse our being, or 
 deal with its constituent elements. It teaches 
 simply that the dissolution of which our present 
 senses are cognizant is net the destruction of our- 
 selves; but it does not define, nor even tend to 
 define, in what the I consists, further than this. 
 Personality implies special limitation, and this 
 limitation (as far as we can see) is conveyed per- 
 fectly by our bodies. It is conceivable that the 
 soul may have some individual inner limitation 
 (so to speak), but of this we have and can have 
 naturally no knowledge. Doubtless • the soul is 
 limited by general laws, which circumscribe its 
 powers and capacities, for otherwise it would not 
 only have an affinity with the infinite, but be 
 infinite; but these general laws do not constitute 
 
 1 Nothing is here said of the intermediate state of the soul 
 after death and before the "Resurrection ; and probably there is 
 something wholly deceptive in our use of words of time (' before' 
 and ' after') in such a connexion. 
 
126 The Judgment 
 
 chap, i r. individual personality. Again: if souls are ori- 
 ginally the same at their connexion with the 
 body we cannot shew how they can be so affected 
 by it as that they should bear away, when wholly 
 dissociated from it, the various results of the con- 
 nexion. Nor if they are originally different can 
 we see how the original differences would be 
 modified; while the assumption of the original 
 difference introduces a fresh difficulty into the 
 question, unless we supplement the assumption 
 by the assertion of the previous existence of 
 souls. 
 
 9. Popular language and belief are so strong 
 in the assertion of the personal immortality of 
 the soul in our post-Christian times, that it is 
 very difficult for us to realize the true state of the 
 problem. The firmness of Christian faith, even 
 where its presence is least suspected, influences 
 the conclusions if not the processes of indepen- 
 dent reasoning. Happily, the noble speculations 
 of the Greek philosophers are a monument of 
 what thought alone could do on this and kindred 
 topics. Yet even here instinct will make itself 
 felt ; and again and again the sequence of an 
 argument is broken by the independent assertion 
 of the truth which instinct and not reason fore- 
 sees or feels. One writer, however, follows the 
 
of Aristotle. 127 
 
 guidance of his logic to its last conclusions. In -chap. ir. 
 his formal treatise On the Soul Aristotle has 
 examined with the most elaborate care the vari- 
 ous elements included in it, and their mutual 
 relations. He seems to watch the process which 
 he guides as one wholly unconcerned in its issue. 
 Sternly and pitilessly he states the last conclusion 
 on man's natural hope of immortality as tested 
 by reason ; and the very coldness of his words 
 give them an undescribable pathos. 
 
 ' In every natural object there are/ he says, J>t Animd 
 1 two elements, the one the characteristic matter 
 ' (so to speak), which includes potentially all the 
 ' manifestations of the object, and the other the 
 ' causative and active principle. These differences 
 'therefore must exist essentially in the soul; an4 
 1 the rational part of man is necessarily twofold. 
 ' On the one side is the " reason" which is to be 
 'so called in virtue of its becoming everything ; 
 'on the other that which takes its name from 
 ' making everything, in the manner in which (to 
 'take an example) light does; for in a certain 
 'sense light makes colours existing potentially, 
 ' to be colours actually. And this latter reason — 
 ' that is, the active reason which has an absolute 
 'existence — is separable and impassive and un- 
 ' mixed in essence.' [It is not dependent in any 
 sense on the present organism of man; it is not 
 
128 The arguments reach 
 
 chap. ii. affected by the changes which it reveals ; it is not 
 modified in any manner by the connexion in 
 which it is placed. It is independent of a union 
 which is begun and ended in time], 'and when 
 ' separated it is that alone which it is essentially.' 
 [It carries with it no trace of its temporary 
 combination with the passive "reason"]; 'and 
 'this alone — this impersonal and unchangeable 
 'reason — is immortal and eternal.' [It has been 
 and we are unconscious of the past. It will be 
 and we shall be unconscious of the present]. 
 'We have no recollection' [of any former exist- 
 ence, and we shall have none hereafter of our 
 life on earth,] 'because this [eternal reason which 
 alone survives] 'is impassive, while the passive 
 ' and susceptible reason ' — the reason which is the 
 seat of all personal feeling and emotion and im- 
 pression — ' is corruptible, and without the eternal 
 ' reason is incapable of thought or consciousness.' 
 
 10. One very important reflexion will illus- 
 trate the force and bearing of Aristotle's judg- 
 ment. We commonly interrogate the soul only 
 as to the future : it can speak equally w r ell of the 
 past. Every argument for the soul's permanence 
 based upon its essential character, tells equally in 
 favour of its preexistence. Keason cannot take 
 into account the idea of its creation ; and all the 
 
backward as well as forward. 129 
 
 presumptions drawn from what we can observe of chap n. 
 its nature and action to shew that it will be, shew 
 equally that it has been. The idea of ? conti- 
 nuance' is equally applicable to the beginning 
 and the end of the life which falls under our ob- 
 servation. In other words, the logical arguments 
 which are supposed to prove that the soul is 
 immortal, prove that it is eternal ' ; and the legiti- 
 
 1 In this aspect the opening chapter of the Analogy is a 
 most instructive lesson in the weakness of pure reason to esta- 
 blish that instinctive hope of a future life, which has existed more 
 or less in every period. Here only, perhaps, Bp. Butler has 
 been unable to cast off the influences of the time in which he 
 lived, and adopted the narrow methods of popular argument 
 which were current in a mechanical age. Throughout he assumes 
 that the * living being' or 'agent,' of which he gives no definition, 
 is separable from our present organization and in itself per- 
 sonal. And again he never notices the application of his argu- 
 ments to a prior as well as to a future existence. This is the 
 more remarkable as he considers with remarkable candour and 
 wisdom the objection urged from the extension of his reasoning 
 to the life of brutes. From whatever cause the defects arose, 
 and it seems most likely that the thoughts which he failed to 
 meet were wholly foreign to the speculations of the time, the 
 fact remains that he assumes the two great principles which 
 above all others he ought to prove, the possibility of conceiving 
 our personality apart from our present bodies, which, though 
 changeable, are yet changeable according to observed laws ; and 
 next that what is true if we look back to the first origin of our 
 present life is not true if we look forward to its close. How 
 momentous the latter assumption is may be seen at once if any 
 one will substitute 'birth' for ' death,' and 'origin' for 'destruc- 
 tion' in the earlier arguments of the chapter. The former as- 
 sumption is even more obviously the assumption of the chief 
 point in the conclusion. 
 
 9 
 
130 The teaching 
 
 chai\ ii. mate deduction is, that as we are now unconscious 
 of any previous existence, and cannot in any way 
 connect our present circumstances and characters 
 in this world with our conduct in another former 
 world, so, if we survive in any future state, we 
 shall be equally unconscious of this through which 
 we are now passing, and not recognise any retri- 
 butive justice in the conditions under which we 
 shall exist. At least any presumption that we 
 shall be conscious hereafter of our present life 
 while we are not conscious of that which we have 
 passed through before, could only be drawn from 
 the observation of a corresponding difference be- 
 tween the conditions and circumstances of our 
 present and past lives which obviously lies wholly 
 without the range of our faculties. For us, as far 
 as the teaching of nature goes, this life stands 
 absolutely alone. The application of the experi- 
 ence which it gives is confined within the limits 
 of its duration. 
 
 11. The judgment of Aristotle sums up the 
 final result of Greek Philosophy on the soul, as a 
 subject of pure speculation. From his time phi- 
 losophy became essentially practical. The great 
 questions of being and knowledge were merged in 
 those of morals, -in which instinct has a legitimate 
 exercise. Later writers therefore furnish nothing 
 
of Plato. 131 
 
 of importance to the exact discussion of the hope cii-vr. n 
 of immortality ; but it is impossible not to com- 
 pare the conclusions of Aristotle with those of 
 Plato. The master is as confident and sanguine 
 as the scholar is sceptical and passionless. But 
 the method of Plato is as full of instruction as the 
 results of Aristotle. Plato is sure of his belief 
 beforehand. His arguments are merely to justify 
 it. And when he feels that these — though 
 strengthened by the bold proposition that we do 
 bring with us to earth traces of our former exist- 
 ence — are unequal to support the weight of his 
 conclusion, he makes, as he expresses it, a bold 
 venture, and presents the substance of his faith 
 in one of those magnificent myths, by which he 
 endeavours to bridge over the chasm between the 
 seen and unseen worlds. His "Republic" closes 
 with the noble legend of Er the son of Armenius, 
 who saw in a trance the judgment of the dead, 
 and the hidden glories of the world. For once, 
 he tells us, a soul was allowed to return to the 
 body without drinking the waters of Forgetfulness. Plat. iiesp. 
 And so 'this story was saved and not lost, and it x * 621 
 will save us/ he adds, 'should we listen to its 
 ' teaching ; and then we shall happily cross the 
 1 river of Lethe and not defile our souls ; but 
 ' deeming that the soul is immortal and capable 
 1 of bearing every evil and winning every good, 
 
 9—2 
 
132 The soul has no power 
 
 .hap. ii. < we shall keep close to the upward path, and 
 * practise in every way justice and wisdom, that 
 'we may be friends to ourselves and friends to 
 g* 'the gods/ 'To confidently affirm that [the fate 
 
 114. 'of souls] is such as I have described/ Socrates 
 
 'says at the end of the "Phsedo," 'becomes no 
 ' reasonable man. But I do think that it becomes 
 ' him to believe that it is either this or like this, 
 ' if at least the soul is shewn to be immortal ; 
 ' and that it is worthy of him to face peril boldly 
 ' in such a belief, for the peril is glorious ; and 
 'such thoughts he ought to use as a charm to 
 1 allay his own misgivings, in which spirit I have 
 t. ' myself dwelt thus long upon the story.' For in 
 
 such questions the really brave man ' will either 
 ' learn or discover the truth, or if this be impos- 
 ' sible he will take at any rate the best of human 
 1 words and that which is most irrefragable, and 
 1 carried on this as on a raft sail through life in 
 ' perpetual jeopardy, unless one might make the 
 'journey on a securer vessel, some divine word if 
 ' it might be, more surely and with less peril/ 
 
 12. If then pure reason cannot suggest any 
 arguments to establish the personality of the soul 
 when finally separated from the body, and for us 
 personality is only another name for existence, 
 still less can it shew any grounds for supposing 
 
 icedo, 85 
 
to make an organization for itself. 133 
 
 that it possesses in itself the power of assuming at chap. n. 
 death another organization corresponding to our 
 present body whereby its personality may be pre- 
 served. Our present body is not in any way, as 
 far as we can see, due primarily to the action of 
 the soul, which acts through and upon it; and 
 when the body is dissolved, the only action of the 
 soul of which we can have naturally any know- 
 ledge ceases. It may have some inherent energy 
 in virtue of which it manifests itself throughout 
 the ages, now in this form, now in that. It may, 
 but that seems harder to conceive, have gained on 
 earth the means of realizing a personal existence 
 hereafter. It may, as many thought even among 
 God's ancient people, go back to Him who gave 
 it and continue to exist only as part of His Infi- 
 nite Being. Our utter incapacity of forming a 
 clear conception of any mode of existence differing 
 in essence from our own, and not simply in extent 
 of similar powers, forces us to contemplate these 
 and other alternatives, and to withhold our judg- 
 ment till we gain some new light. If we look 
 within or without we have absolutely no analogy 
 to carry our thoughts one step onward into a 
 realm wholly unknown: none to shew that the 
 soul will exert a power there which has been un- 
 developed or dormant here. Every change which 
 we can follow is simply of the earth. Faith, or 
 
13-fc The conflict of Instinct and Reason 
 
 chap. ii. love, or instinct, may cross the dark river, but 
 they go alone : reason cannot follow them. Nay 
 more : reason shews that the visions which they 
 see are mere shadowy projections of what we see 
 and feel now. 
 
 13. Thus we are placed before a final con- 
 tradiction. On the one side instinct clings to the 
 belief in the continuance of our personality after 
 death : on the other reason points to death as a 
 phenomenon absolutely singular which closes life, 
 as far as we know it, and takes away the con- 
 ditions of our life. But if experience can shew 
 that these conditions are not destroyed, but sus- 
 pended as far as we observe them, or modified 
 by the action of some new law : that what seems 
 to be a dissolution is really a transformation : 
 that the soul does not remain alone in a future 
 state, but is still united with our body, that is 
 with an organism which in a new sphere ex- 
 presses the law which our present body now ex- 
 presses in this ; then reason will welcome the 
 belief in our future personality no less than in- 
 stinct. For the truth is not against reason but 
 beyond it. Reason shews simply that what we 
 commonly see, and what we can learn from the 
 analysis of our own nature lends no support to 
 the conclusion which we cannot abandon. But 
 
solved by the Resurrection, 135 
 
 let some new fact come in, and all will be changed, chap. ii. 
 if that reveals to us something of the character of 
 life after death. 
 
 14. Such a fact is the Kesurrection. In one 
 sense no event can be more natural than this, so 
 far as it answers to a craving for knowledge of 
 the unseen world, which by its intensity indicates 
 that it was intended to be satisfied, as much as 
 any other original instinct of man. In another 
 sense nothing can be more beyond nature, for it 
 introduces us to a new phase of being, of which 
 we feel even in the presence of this revelation that 
 we can know only a part darkly. For the Resur- 
 rection is not like any one of the recorded miracles 
 of raising from the dead. It is not a restoration 
 to the old life, to its wants, to its special limita- 
 tions, to its inevitable close. It is not an exten- 
 sion of an existence with which we are acquainted, 
 but the manifestation of an existence for which we 
 hope. It is not like any of the fabled apotheoses 
 of the friends of gods, whose spirits purified by 
 the funeral fire from the stains of earth, were 
 carried to the immediate presence of those whom 
 they had loved. It is not a withdrawal from men 
 or a laying aside of humanity, complete, final, and 
 immediate. It is not the putting off of the body, 
 but the transfiguration of it. It is not like any 
 
136 The character of 
 
 chap. ir. of the dreams in which earlier poets had endea- 
 voured to convey to others the hope which they 
 cherished. Its teaching is conveyed in a series of 
 facts. Now one incident and now another brings 
 out some aspect of the whole truth, as far as we 
 can apprehend it. No vision is opened of glory 
 or suffering. No display is made of fresh powers. 
 No overpowering exhibition of majesty strikes 
 unwilling conviction into the hearts of those who 
 were before unbelieving 1 . The Lord rose from 
 
 1 It has been objected that our Lord revealed Himself only 
 to believers or to those inclined to believe. If we regard the 
 Resurrection as a revelation of a new life it is obvious that it 
 could not have been otherwise. In order to establish the belief 
 in the reality of this new existence it was necessary that some 
 power should exist in the witnesses to apprehend it. There was 
 a spiritual side to the manifestation of the Risen Christ which 
 could only be discerned spiritually. If it had been necessary 
 merely to shew the restoration of the Lord to the condition of 
 an ordinary human life, as in the case of Lazarus, the testimony 
 of indifferent spectators would have been adequate. But if the 
 appearances were designed to be a revelation of a glorified 
 human life, then the manifestation to unbelievers would not only 
 have been contrary to the usual method of the Providence of God, 
 but also, as far as we can see, unavailing. For if the Lord 
 had appeared to them as a man simply, their evidence would 
 have gone to establish a false view of His Risen Person : if He 
 had appeared to them under new conditions of being, they 
 would have been unable to acknowledge the reality of His mani- 
 festation. The believer who had familiarly known Christ and 
 felt His power could alone grasp and harmonize the two modes 
 of the Revelation of His Person. Afterwards, when the idea 
 of the Risen Christ was fully established, we find an appearance 
 
the appearances of the Lord. 
 
 the grave ; and those who had known Hi: 
 knew that He was the same and yet chang< 
 
 15. In this respect the narratives of the 
 Resurrection are unparalleled. The Evangelists 1 
 record the miracle so calmly, looking solely, as 
 we must think, at its historic aspect, that in read- 
 ing of it, we lose sight of its stupendous signifi- 
 cance from the natural simplicity of the details 
 in which its lessons are conveyed. The mani- 
 festations of the risen Saviour are mixed with 
 scenes of fear, of misgiving, of unbelief. He ap- 
 peared in Galilee and at Jerusalem : now at night, 
 and again in the early morning: in the upper 
 room and under the open sky: in an assembly 
 gathered, as it would seem, for religious exercise, 
 and to men busy with their ordinary work. 
 Nothing is (if we may so speak) farther from the 
 thoughts of the Evangelists than to give a doc- 
 trinal view of the mystery which they declare. 
 Christ was the same and yet changed. That was 
 
 different in kind granted to St Paul, which carried with it 
 immediate conviction to an unbeliever; but till this idea was 
 established, as far as we can judge, such an appearance would 
 have been without effect. 
 
 1 At this point I shall use the writings of the New Testa- 
 ment without reserve. If the Resurrection is admitted on other 
 grounds to be a fact, no one will (I believe) question the general 
 veracity of the Evangelists. 
 
138 The Lord the same 
 
 chap. ii. i n substance what the}' had to tell ; and in that 
 lies the full answer to the first great question 
 before us. The body is not destroyed by death. 
 Its union with the soul is for a time (as we are 
 forced to conceive of it, though perhaps quite 
 wrongly) interrupted but not closed. Our specu- 
 lative doubts are met, as they could only be met, 
 by a fact. 
 
 16. It is unnecessary to dw T ell on the various 
 
 details by which the identity of the Lord's human 
 
 body is brought out in the Gospels. It is obvious 
 
 from a mere enumeration that they meet each 
 
 John xx. misgiving. The body which the disciples had laid 
 
 in the sepulchre was no longer to be found when 
 
 they looked for it. The marks of the Passion were 
 
 made sensibly present in the Risen Saviour to him 
 
 who would not otherwise believe. Nay more, 
 
 Christ Himself offered this very proof to those 
 
 Luke xxiv. who ' supposed that they had seen a spirit/ ' Be- 
 
 1 hold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself : 
 
 1 handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh 
 
 Comp. 'and bones, as ye see me have '../And He took 
 
 John xx. c r mea ^i an( j d^ ea t before them/ And it can 
 
 Comp. hardly be without reference to this incident that 
 
 johni.ii. St John in his Epistle reckons this 'handling' 
 
 last among the various revelations which God 
 
 had given of His Son. The length of time too 
 
yet changed. 139 
 
 during which the appearances were extended fa- chap. ii. 
 
 miliarized the disciples (so to speak) with the 
 
 mystery which had at first filled them with terror. 
 
 For forty days He ' shewed Himself alive to them Acts i. 3. 
 
 1 by many infallible proofs, being seen of them and 
 
 1 speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom 
 
 'of God/ 
 
 17. But this Body which was recognized as 
 essentially the same Body, had yet undergone 
 some marvellous change, of which we can gain a 
 faint idea by what is directly recorded of its mani- 
 festations. Under a physical image that change is Luke xxiv. 
 presented to us by our Lord Himself in the ab- ^ 9 ' h 
 sence of blood, the symbol and seat of corruptible 
 life. The significance of the omission must have 
 been at once intelligible to Jews, accustomed to 
 the provisions of the Mosaic ritual, and nothing 
 would have impressed upon them more forcibly 
 the transfiguration of Christ's Body. We find 
 moreover that His Person was not recognized 
 directly by those who saw Him. However firm 
 their conviction was afterwards that they had 
 'seen the Lord,' they knew Him first when He 
 was pleased to make Himself known. Human 
 sense alone was not capable of- discerning Who He 
 was. It could not be otherwise if His Body was 
 glorified, for our senses can only apprehend that 
 
140 The Resurrection the pledge of the 
 
 < hap ir. Avliich is of kindred nature with themselves. At 
 
 : ■ one time it was by a word of general or per- 
 
 John xx. S onal tenderness, that Christ awakened the faith 
 io, 19. 
 
 by which sense was quickened : at another time 
 
 Lukexxiv. by the celebration of that holy rite which He 
 
 John xxi. nac l instituted before His death : at another by 
 
 a mighty act which symbolized the blessing of 
 
 the apostolic work. 
 
 18. And as Christ's Body was no longer 
 
 necessarily to be recognized, so also it was not 
 
 bound by the material laws to which its action 
 
 was generally conformed. He is found present, 
 
 no one knows from whence. He passes away, 
 
 no one knows whither. He stands in the midst 
 
 John xx. of the little group of the Apostles 'when the 
 
 Luke xxiv. ' doors were shut for fear of the Jews/ ' He 
 
 31 * 'vanished out of the sight* of those whose eyes 
 
 were opened that they knew Him. And at last 
 
 Acts i. 9. ' while they beheld, He was taken up, and a cloud 
 
 1 received Him out of their sight.' It is impossible 
 
 not to feel in reading the narratives that we are 
 
 regarding a form of existence human, indeed, yet 
 
 indefinitely ennobled by the removal of needs and 
 
 limitations to which we are at present subject. 
 
 It is vain for us to speculate on the nature of 
 
 that transformed human Body. We can form no 
 
 clear positive conception which is not shaped by 
 
 the present laws of thought. Negatively we can 
 
transfiguration of our whole being. 141 
 
 only say that it was not bound by those laws of chap. ii. 
 space (for example) which necessarily enter into 
 all that we think or do. The life which is re- 
 vealed to us is not the continuation of the pre- 
 sent life, but a life which takes up into itself 
 all the elements of our present life, and trans- 
 figures them by a glorious change, which we can 
 regard at present only under signs and figures. 
 
 19. Thus the Resurrection answers as com- 
 pletely as it can be answered the first great question 
 by which we are met. In the Person of Christ 
 we see the whole of man, his body and soul, 
 raised together from the grave. No part is left 
 behind. The whole complex nature is raised and 
 glorified. It is not that the soul only lives; nor 
 yet that the body, such as it was, is restored to 
 its former vigour. The Saviour, as far as we 
 regard His Manhood, is not unclothed, to use St 
 Paul's image, but clothed upon. Nothing is taken 
 away, but something is added by which all that 
 was before present is transfigured. * The corrup- 
 1 tible puts on incorruption : the mortal puts on 
 1 immortality/ 
 
 20. This thought brings us to the second 
 question, the final relation of man to God, of man, 
 that is, as subject to the consequences of sin. 
 
142 The idea of Sin. 
 
 chap. ii. And here it will be necessary to consider somewhat 
 carefully the idea which lies at the root of sin, 
 lest it may seem that we are dealing with a mere 
 phantom. But still we may leave out of our 
 investigation some questions which have been 
 connected with it. Our inquiry does not extend 
 to the obstacles which material nature places in 
 the way of man, of whatever form they may be, 
 nor yet to the mutual relations of animals to one 
 another or to man. We are obviously wholly 
 incapable of knowing any thing of the position in 
 ay 1 rich any beings except ourselves stand towards 
 God, or of their latent powers, or of their future 
 destiny. It is quite conceivable that what ap- 
 pears to us in the light of suffering and decay in 
 beings wholly unlike ourselves may to a higher 
 intelligence assume a different aspect; or (and this 
 seems even from a view of nature far more pro- 
 bable) the fate of the physical and animal crea- 
 tion may be bound up by some mysterious influ- 
 ence with that of man. At least, we can see the 
 difference between what we call evil in inorganic 
 or brute nature, and evil (moral evil) in man 
 which involves the operation of a free will, and 
 an acknowledged relation between the person of 
 the sinner and God. Whether these conditions 
 of action can exist in the case of other creatures 
 or not we are wholly unable to determine ; but it 
 
Sin not necessary for mans development 143 
 
 is at least remarkable that as soon as the pheno- chap. ii. 
 mena of free will are observable in animals (as in 
 the case of those which have been long associated 
 with man) we attribute to them a measure of 
 responsibility by according praise and blame. 
 
 21. The possibility of sin is necessarily in- 
 cluded in the creation of a finite, free being ; for 
 the simplest idea which we can form of sin, is the 
 finite setting itself up against the infinite. Self- 
 ishness, which exists potentially as soon as 'self' 
 exists is the ground of all sin. Hence we can see 
 how a perfect finite being may yet be exposed to 
 temptation, for the sense of limitation brings 
 ay i th it the thought, or the possibility of the 
 thought, of passing the limit. 
 
 22. And not only is a perfect finite being in 
 this way necessarily under a moral probation, but 
 the actual existence of sin is not required for his 
 moral development. It is necessary to dwell on 
 this point, for if it could be shewn that sin belongs 
 essentially to the idea of individual human pro- 
 gress as one of the conditions of its realization, we 
 might at once dismiss as vain the obstinate ques- 
 tionings with which we ponder over its future 
 issues. It is only if sin is an intrusive corruption 
 of our nature that we need feel anxious about the 
 
! I I Evil may he the occasion 
 
 chap. ii. permanence of its results. But it follows from 
 the final analysis of sin which has been given that 
 man, though he had not sinned, might yet have 
 practised some (at least) essentially human vir- 
 tues : all indeed which are comprised in self- 
 control and the recognition of dependence. No- 
 thing therefore can be more false than to say that 
 * moral good and moral evil — as distinguished 
 from the possibility of good and evil — came into 
 being together.' A command implies the possi- 
 bility of obedience and disobedience, but obedience 
 is no less real though disobedience in fact never 
 takes place. Love, again, the centre of all social 
 virtues, and truth the centre of all intellectual 
 virtues, are both wholly independent of the pre- 
 sence of evil among men. 
 
 23. But it may be said, that if moral evil 
 were removed from the world ' life would be im- 
 poverished.' So indeed it appears at first sight 
 to us who are habituated to the startling con- 
 trasts of life : for us shadow is a necessity of dis- 
 tinct vision. Yet it would be difficult to shew 
 that the more splendid qualities which are brought 
 out (for instance) by war are better, in any sense, 
 than their correlatives which need no such field 
 for their display : that the heroic forgetfulness or 
 contempt of danger or suffering, which springs 
 
but not the condition of good. 1 1 •"> 
 
 from a great passion or a generous impulse in chap. ii. 
 the midst of a fierce conflict or under the sense of 
 a deep wrong, is better than that rational self- 
 control which we have seen can exist in the high- 
 est degree without the presence of evil. We are 
 too apt to think that virtue which is seen on a 
 larger scale is itself magnified. On the other hand 
 it may be allowed that evil itself serves as part 
 of our discipline : that it gives occasion for the 
 exercise of special virtues, and by antagonism calls 
 them into play; yet this is only to say that it 
 has been so ordered that evil shall in some de- 
 gree minister to its own defeat. 
 
 24. And while we grant that in society evil 
 may be the occasion of good, it is by no means 
 clear that this is true in the individual As far as 
 we can see, the presence of evil, that is the wilful 
 transgression of limit as distinguished from the 
 original limitation, is neither the occasion, nor 
 the condition of good, nor on the narrow stage of 
 human life the preliminary to it. The highest 
 conception of active virtue — duty — is absolutely 
 untouched by it both in its origin and in its ful- 
 filment, even when evil is regarded under the ex- 
 treme form of pain. 
 
 25. Moreover it must be observed that evil 
 
 10 
 
146 Sin foreign to our natiwe, and yet 
 
 chap. ii. while it may be the occasion of good, is never 
 transmuted into good. Evil remains evil to the 
 last in whatever form it may shew itself. Sin 
 remains sin : pain remains pain : ignorance (so 
 far as it is culpable) remains ignorance : though 
 sin and pain and ignorance may call forth efforts 
 of love and fortitude and patience. 
 
 26. Nor can it be said that sin realized, and 
 not merely the possibility of sin by the action of 
 a free will, is the necessary condition of human 
 virtue, and consequently of human happiness. 
 For if this were true, then it would follow either 
 that evil itself will be eternal, or that human life 
 in its true sense will cease to be. Whatever may 
 be the function of evil in the social discipline of 
 men whose powers are already impaired by sin, 
 we have no reason to think that it could find any 
 place for giving occasion to new or higher good in 
 a society of men animated by those active and 
 personal virtues which have been seen to be 
 wholly independent of it (§§ 22, 24) ; not to speak 
 of the possibility of other forms of virtuous cha- 
 racter inconceivable in our present mixed state ; 
 for the permanence of the antitypes or perfections 
 of our present virtues in another state by no 
 means excludes the possibility of the existence of 
 other virtues as yet unknown, which may come 
 
to Reason its results seem permanent. 147 
 
 into play from the manifestations of new relations CIIvr n 
 between ourselves or of ourselves to other intelli- 
 gent beings. 
 
 27. It follows then that sin — moral evil as 
 involving the action of will — is in fact something 
 wholly foreign to human nature : that in its essen- 
 tial character it remains always evil even when 
 it is the occasion of good : that it is not a lower 
 form of goodness or a necessary condition for its 
 exercise, but the conscious transgression of limit : 
 that in the individual it leads to no good: that 
 even in society at large its disciplinary power only 
 effects by sacrifice and imperfectly what the ob- 
 servance of the true bounds of nature would effect 
 perfectly. It is then a foreign element in our* 
 nature, and absolutely abhorrent from our proper 
 destiny. But it is also, as far as reason can trace, 
 permanent. 
 
 28. It is this fact which gives to the idea 
 of sin its most terrible significance. As far as 
 we can conceive by the help of reason the effects 
 of every action must be infinite, and in regard to 
 the agent (whatever they may be to others) cor- 
 responding to and like the action. But all sin (as 
 such) necessarily involves the idea of suffering to 
 the person who commits it; for selfishness, the 
 
 10—2 
 
148 Suffering no expiation. 
 
 0HAF. P- final element of sin, is the contrary of love, and 
 therefore when set against Infinite Love must 
 bring the misery of unavailing desire and isolation* 
 Hence punishment (for all consequences must at 
 at last be referred to the Will of the Personal 
 Creator), or (in another light) suffering as the 
 natural consequence of selfishness, must exist as 
 long as sin exists ; and so in any particular case 
 the past sin must still work its full effect in sepa- 
 r.iting the sinner from God without end, unless 
 some new power be interposed. 
 
 29. For it must be noticed that suffering has 
 in itself no power or tendency to remove or ex- 
 piate sin, the consequences of which are best con- 
 ceived as evolved (so to speak) naturally and cen- 
 tering in the changed character of the guilty, and 
 not imposed externally according to any fixed 
 
 ndard. Nor again has it in itself any power 
 to produce repentance, by which in the inter- 
 course of man and man the effects of wrong-doing, 
 as far as their mutual relations are concerned, 
 may be removed. But even in this latter case no 
 repentance can cancel the consequences of the 
 wrong action, either without the doer or within 
 him. These throughout life and (as far as we can 
 see) beyond it are inwrought into the world and 
 into his nature. Future punishment is a conclu- 
 
Conflict of Instinct and Reason. 149 
 
 sion of reason, if we grant the future continuance chap, it 
 of our personality. The mystery which reason 
 cannot of itself apprehend is that this punish- 
 ment can be stayed. Thus if we approach the 
 subject from this side it is the forgiveness, or 
 rather the ' washing away ' of sins and not their 
 punishment, which is the real subject of Revela- 
 tion. If on the other hand we confine our view 
 to this life, the idea of a Supreme Being tempering 
 suffering with a view to repentance answers to an 
 instinct of man and not to any logical process ; 
 and Scripture first teaches us to believe that the 
 instinct is true. 
 
 30. For just as there is an instinct within us 
 which claims the inheritance of a future life, so 
 we feel that after sin repentance is still possible 
 and efficacious, and that our Heavenly Father can 
 do away our sins. But Reason which deserted us 
 before equally deserts us now. It tells us from 
 the observation of what we see around and from 
 the conception which we are forced to make of 
 the dependence of the future on the past, that 
 we must be for ever, in relation to God, what 
 we are, and bear about with us the scars and 
 wounds which sin has inflicted upon us. 
 
 31. Here again the fact of the Resurrection 
 
150 The Resurrection in connexion 
 
 chap. u. meets our doubts with a new Revelation. If 
 we look at our Blessed Lord simply as He was 
 seen outwardly, He bore in Himself all the con- 
 sequences of sin. ■ He was tempted in all points 
 'like as we are' except by personal sin. He took 
 our flesh with its liabilities to hunger, and fatigue, 
 and pain upon Him : He shared the emotions of 
 anger, and sorrow, and affection : He bore death 
 with its most terrible accompaniments, the last 
 issue of sin, and that sense of utter isolation from 
 God, which is its complete punishment. What- 
 ever sin could work He took upon Himself; 
 and when all was ended God raised Him up 
 'for our justification/ and the Lord Jesus bore 
 our human nature, over which sin had no longer 
 power, to the immediate presence of the Father. 
 
 32. But it will be said that the Lord's suffer- 
 ings were not the result (as ours are) of personal 
 sin, and consequently that we can draw no com- 
 fort from His triumph over death. To this objec- 
 tion it is in part an answer to reply that the 
 sufferings of Christ were as though they were due 
 to Himself. How this could be in regard to the 
 more general consequences of sin, as want or 
 grief, is sufficiently intelligible from the fact that 
 He was truly man. But how He could take sin 
 upon Him is a mystery which we cannot solve, 
 
with tlie forgiveness of Sin. 151 
 
 though in fact it is only a mystery of the same chap. ii. 
 
 kind as His taking upon Him our nature. Yet 
 
 even here so much at least we can see, that in the 
 
 Agony and on the Cross He suffered, yet with 
 
 an intensity which we cannot appreciate, even as 
 
 those do who bear the consequences of personal 
 
 sin. ' He offered up prayers and supplications Heb. v. 7. 
 
 1 with strong crying and tears unto Him that was 
 
 ' able to save Him from death, and was heard in 
 
 ! that He feared/ 
 
 33. The complete answer lies somewhat 
 deeper, as has been already indicated, in the 
 recognition of our Lord's Divine Person. It is 
 impossible to understand the Resurrection com- 
 pletely apart from the Incarnation. It may 
 indeed be said that the Resurrection is the his- 
 toric seal of the Incarnation, which remains for 
 ever a mystery removed from all witness. And 
 it was in this sense that the first teachers of 
 Christianity understood and interpreted it. After 
 the Resurrection, as we have seen (1. §§ 55 &.), 
 they saw in Christ a Saviour of boundless power. 
 His Life and Death were contemplated in their 
 atoning virtue : His Name was given as that 
 whereby men might be saved : in Him was Life. 
 The contrast between that which was appre- 
 hended, if with the deepest reverence, we may so 
 
152 How the 11 ' >n of Clirist 
 
 chap. ii. speak, as personal discipline and redeeming power, 
 
 Heb. ii. was placed in its broadest light. ' It became' God 
 
 'to make Him perfect through suffering/ and 
 
 even thus ' He tasted death for every man.' He 
 
 . i. 4 . was 'declared to be the Son of God with power, 
 
 ' according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resur- 
 
 Heb. v. 8, ' rection from the dead/ And ' Though He were 
 
 9- * a Son, yet learned He obedience by the things 
 
 1 which He suffered ; and being made perfect, He 
 
 ' became the author of eternal salvation unto all 
 
 'them that obey Him.' 
 
 34. Apart from this faith in the Divinity of 
 Christ, His Resurrection loses its highest signifi- 
 cance. It has in itself and absolutely no direct 
 and immediate connexion with ourselves. It is 
 an isolated incident in the history of mankind, 
 glorious and full of hope but not the new birth of 
 humanity. It answers to that view of the Lord 
 which represents Him as a Teacher simply, and 
 does not, according to the apostolic pattern, bring 
 out into chief prominence .what He did and what 
 He was. If Christ was only man, such as we are 
 in nature, then His triumph over death is no 
 Gospel for those who are bowed down with the 
 John xiv. weight of guilt. In Him we can feel that ' the 
 1 Prince of this world when he came had nothing:' 
 Death could not hold Him. For ourselves, 'we 
 
includes our Resurrection. 153 
 
 'receive' in corruption 'the due reward of our chap, n 
 
 Lul 
 41. 
 
 1 deeds : but this man hath done nothing amiss/ 
 
 35. On such a theory no hope like that of 
 St Paul could repose. But once introduce the 
 belief in Christ's divine nature, and His Death 
 and Resurrection are no longer of the individual 
 but of the race. Nor in doing this are we taking 
 refuge in an arbitrary assumption to help our 
 argument. On the contrary, we simply repeat 
 the interpretation which the Apostles placed on 
 the whole work of the Saviour. It was on this 
 belief that the Church was founded and built up. 
 The belief was not indeed always drawn out with 
 exact prepision, yet it was always implied in the 
 relation which the believer was supposed to hold 
 to God in Christ. The formula of Baptism, which 
 has never changed, is unintelligible without it. 
 The Eucharist is emptied of the blessing which 
 every age has sought in that Holy Sacrament, if 
 it be taken away. 
 
 36. If Christ took our nature upon Him (as 
 we believe) by an act of love, it was not that of 
 one but of all. Mankind are (so to speak) orga- 
 nically united with Him. His acts are in a true 
 sense our acts, so far as we realize the union : H i - 
 death is our death : His Resurrection, our Resur- 
 
1 8 I The acts of Christ belong 
 
 (hap. ir. rection. Nothing can be plainer than the asscr- 
 
 i Cor. vi. tion of this doctrine. Our ' bodies are members 
 of Christ ;' and conversely a Christian society is 
 
 i Cor. xii. ' a body of Christ/ * I have been/ St Paul says, 
 
 Gal. ii. 10. ' crucified with Christ/ ' If we died with Christ, 
 he writes to the Romans, 'we believe that we 
 
 ' shall also live with Him Reckon ye also 
 
 * yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but living 
 'unto God in Christ Jesus/ And yet more 
 
 Eph. ii. 5, plainly, ' When we were dead in sins [God] quick- 
 1 ened us together with Christ, and raised us up 
 1 together, and made us sit together in the hea- 
 
 Col. ii. ii, t venlv realm in Christ Jesus/ 'In whom also ye 
 'were circumcised with the circumcision made 
 'without hands, in putting off the boojy of the 
 Us of the flesh, in the circumcision of Christ, 
 'buried with Him in baptism, wherein also ye 
 'were raised with Him through faith in the opera* 
 ' tion of God who raised Him from the dead/ So 
 
 i Pet. 1.3. again St Peter speaks of God ' who begat us 
 1 again to a living hope through the resurrection 
 ' of Jesus Christ from the dead ; ' and his final 
 
 1 Pet. v. salutation is, ' Peace be with you all who are in 
 ' Christ Jesus/ 
 
 37. The ground of these and similar state- 
 ments is found in the words of our Lord, which 
 first receive through them their full significance. 
 
 '4 
 
to the whole Body of Christ loo 
 
 * Abide in me and I in you ... I am the Yine ; ye chap. ii. 
 'are the branches. He that abideth in me and I °, nxv 
 
 4» 5* 
 
 ' in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit ; for 
 ' without (apart from) me ye can do nothing/ And 
 again, in His last great prayer for His disciples, He 
 says : ' For their sakes I sanctify myself, that they 
 ' also may be sanctified in truth. Neither pray I 
 'for these alone, but for them also which shall 
 1 believe on me through their word ; that they all 
 ' may be one ; as Thou, Father, art in me and I 
 'in Thee, that they also may be one in us... I in 
 1 them, and Thou in Me, that they may be made 
 'perfect in one/ 
 
 38. The full doctrine of the Resurrection can- 
 not be understood without constant reference to 
 these deeper revelations of Christ's Person ; nor 
 again is the Apostolic doctrine of the Person of 
 Christ intelligible without the light of the glorious 
 manifestations of Himself which He made to His 
 disciples after He was risen from the dead. But 
 it is not our object now to follow out the mutual 
 relations of these two elements of our Creed, or to 
 trace them both back to the Incarnation. It is 
 enough to have indicated in what way we can 
 conceive that the efficacy of the Resurrection is 
 extended to those for whom Christ died; and 
 having done this we may next notice how the 
 
L56 The personal significance 
 
 niAP. ii. teaching of the Resurrection on the dignity of 
 the body tends to explain the relation of the 
 individual self to the world. 
 
 39. The noblest of the ancient moralists 
 looked upon man's body as a hopeless burden and 
 fatal hindrance to the soul; and in this they 
 have been followed by the noblest non-Christian 
 moralists in every age. The famous thanksgiving 
 of Plotinus that 'he was not tied to an immortal 
 'body* expresses the common feeling of all who 
 have not felt the power of the Resurrection. But 
 Christianity transfigures what philosophy would 
 destroy. It shews that the corruption by which 
 we are weighed down does not belong to our 
 proper nature, and is not necessarily bound up 
 with it for ever. It lays open with a deeper and 
 more searching criticism than a system of morality 
 could direct, the internal struggles to which the 
 'flesh' must give occasion, and the inevitable de- 
 feats which we must suffer in our efforts towards 
 the divine life. Plato does not describe more 
 sadly than St Paul the afflictions by which we are 
 Philiii.ii. beset while yet oppressed by 'the body of humi- 
 1 liation.' Or to take an example from a different 
 sect and age, M. Aurelius does not express more 
 keenly than St John a sense of the evils of the 
 present life. But there is an immeasurable chasm 
 
of the Resurrection of the Body. 1-57 
 
 between the Apostles and Platonists or Stoics, chap. ii. 
 
 1 We that are in this tabernacle do groan, being 
 
 1 burdened,' St Paul writes : ' not for that we would 2 Cor - v - 4- 
 
 'be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality 
 
 ' may be swallowed up by life.' The better change 
 
 for which he longed was not the destruction but 
 
 the ennobling of his body, so that it might 'be Phil.iii.21. 
 
 ' fashioned like unto [Christ's] body of glory, ac- 
 
 ' cording to the working whereby he is able even to 
 
 ' subdue all things unto Himself/ And the power 
 
 by which this transformation should be effected 
 
 was the simple contemplation of Christ in His 
 
 essential majesty. Nay, in some sense the change 
 
 is already begun on earth, so far as that we can 
 
 look forward with full hope to its accomplishment ; 
 
 for 'we all, with open face beholding as in a glass 2C0r.iii.18. 
 
 ' the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same 
 
 ' image from glory to glory/ ' Beloved, now are we 1 John Hi. 
 
 ' the sons of God,' such are St John's words, ' and 
 
 ' it doth not yet appear what we shall be : but we 
 
 ' know that, when He shall appear, we shall be like 
 
 ' Him, for we shall see Him as He is.' 
 
 40. In a word our present body is as the \j 
 seed of our future body. The one rises as naturally 
 from the other as the flower from the germ. ' It J Cor - xv - 
 'is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorrup- 
 ' tion : it is sown in dishonour, it is raised in glory : 
 
158 The moral significance 
 
 ciiap. ii. ' it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power : it 
 'is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual 
 1 body/ We cannot, indeed, form any conception 
 of the change which shall take place, except so 
 far as is shewn in the Person of the Lord. Its 
 fulfilment is in another state, and our thoughts 
 are bound by this state. But there is nothing 
 (^against reason in the analogy. Every change of 
 life which we can observe now must be from one 
 material form to another equally falling under our 
 senses ; but such a change may help us to under- 
 stand how a form at present sensible may pass 
 through a great crisis into another, which is an 
 expression of the same law of life, though our 
 present senses cannot naturally take cognizance 
 of it (i. § 1). If the analogy were to explain the 
 passage of man from an existence of one kind 
 (limited by a body) to ;m existence of another 
 kind (unlimited by a body), it would then be 
 false; but as it is, it illustrates by a vivid figure, 
 the perpetuity of our bodily life, as proved in the 
 Resurrection of Christ. 
 
 41. The moral significance of such a doctrine 
 as the Resurrection of the body cannot be over- 
 rated. Both personally and socially it places the 
 sanctions if not the foundations of morality on 
 a new ground. Each sin against the body is no 
 
of the Resurrection of the Body. 159 
 
 longer a stain on that which is itself doomed to chap. ii. 
 perish, but a defilement of that which is con- 
 secrated to an eternal life. To injure another, is 
 to injure one with whom we are bound by the 
 closest ties through a common fellowship in 
 Christ. * The body is not for fornication, but for i Cor. vi. 
 1 the Lord ; and the Lord for the body. And God 
 ' both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us 
 * by His power. Know you not that your bodies 
 'are the members of Christ V 'Speak every man Eph.iv.25. 
 ' truth with his neighbour : for we are members one 
 ' of another/ Each Christian society is ' a body of 
 ' Christ/ of which the members are charged with 
 various functions; and these 'bodies' again are 
 ' members' of other ' bodies' wider and greater, and 
 these at last 'members' of that universal Church 
 which is the 'fulness of Christ,' its heavenly 
 Head. 
 
 42. In this way the doctrine of the Resur- 
 rection turned into a reality the exquisite myth 
 of Plato, in which he represented tyrants and 
 great men waiting for their final sentence from 
 the judges of Hades, with their bodies scarred and 
 wounded by lust and passion and cruelty. And at 
 the same time the notion of civic union in which 
 lay so much of the strength and virtue of classical 
 life, is freed from the dangers of party and class 
 
1G0 The moral 'nee 
 
 (ii\r. ii and extended to the utmost limits of a human 
 brotherhood. The earliest religious instinct of 
 men taught them to regard each class, each guild, 
 each city, each state, as standing in a corporate 
 connexion with some particular deity, and enjoy- 
 ing his protection: Christianity satisfies the in- 
 stinct, and harmonizes the idea of a special re- 
 lationship to a Divine Lord with that of catholic 
 union in Him. It gives the largest range to the 
 sympathies and obligations of men at the very 
 time when it lays the greatest weight on the 
 distinct importance and eternal issues of every 
 isolated human action. 
 
 43. The perfect reconciliation of the claims 
 and duties of the individual and of the society 
 is no less characteristic of the teaching of Chris- 
 tianity than the hallowing (so to speak) of the 
 mutual relationship of soul and body; and both 
 doctrines alike find their historical basis and the 
 pledge of their realization in the Kesurrection. 
 In prae-Christian times the individual was either 
 sacrificed to the state, or contemplated wholly 
 apart from it. The Platonist, in theory, regarded 
 the man in a perfect society as simply living for 
 it, and having independently no personal worth. 
 The Stoic stood apart in proud loneliness, and 
 looked on the turmoil of statemanship and war 
 
of the resurrection of the Body. 161 
 
 with the stern indifference of despair or resig- chap. ii. 
 nation. In practice both were more or less un- 
 faithful to their creed. Socrates found problems 
 of life which were so absorbing that till he had 
 solved these, he affirmed that he could not inter- 
 fere with politics. M. Aurelius, while he steeled 
 himself against the future by steadfastly affirming 
 the existence of a fated cycle of human destinies, 
 yet laboured with a faithful will to discharge the 
 offices of the empire. But neither had any prin- 
 ciple to justify the combination of the conflicting 
 elements of action and thought. Instinct only 
 was stronger than logic. But the Apostles could 
 declare that the sanctity of the man rests on the 
 same fact as the sanctity of the society : that the 
 dignity of personal action is not in conflict, but 
 in absolute harmony, with that of social action: 
 that duties to self and to others are simply dif- 
 ferent expressions of the same belief in one abso- 
 lute unity. No power which has ever effectually 
 stirred men to heroism or self-devotion is lost, 
 but all are seen in one source. 
 
 44. The glorious view which is thus opened 
 of the one life 'fulfilled in many ways' which 
 animates mankind, potentially at least, does not 
 exhaust the prospect which Christianity offers to 
 the eye of faith. Glimpses are given of a yet 
 
 11 
 
162 The doctrine of the Resurrection 
 
 chap. ii. wider harmony and a vaster change. Eeference 
 has been made already to the passages in which 
 the apostolic writings notice the fellowship of 
 nature in the blessings of Redemption (i. § 1). It 
 is evident from our ignorance of the forces at 
 work in the outer world, of which we can ob- 
 serve only some effects according to our limited 
 powers of perception, that we are quite unable 
 to form any notion of ' a new heaven and a new 
 ' earth.' Yet the fact of the Resurrection of the 
 body suggests most forcibly the literal truth of 
 
 Acts iii. 1 1. that 'restitution of all things' which was an- 
 nounced from the first by St Peter. The enno- 
 bling of our material organization contains, as 
 it were, the promise of a more complete transfi- 
 guration of Nature. It is possible that the change 
 lies nearer to us than we are apt to imagine. It 
 may perhaps be the case that what appear to us 
 to be imperfections and evils in the physical or 
 animal world may derive the character which 
 we attribute to them from the incompleteness of 
 our own faculties; and that this transfiguration 
 (relative to us) may lie within us and not with- 
 out. 
 
 45. Whether this view is true or not it con- 
 tains an important element of truth which is 
 commonly neglected. What we call ' laws of 
 
in relation to our perception of Nature. 163 
 
 'nature' are, as has been seen (Introd. § 8), no- 
 thing more than laws of our present observation 
 of nature. They are a resultant, so to speak, of 
 some unknown force without and our own powers 
 of sensation and thought. The permanence of 
 the law depends on the permanence of these two 
 elements: if either is changed the resultant is 
 also changed. If then our bodily powers are 
 transfigured, as we see in the Resurrection of the 
 Lord, our powers of observation and the limitations 
 (as of space or time and the like) according to 
 which we class phenomena, will undergo a pro- 
 portionate change. Thus for us the 'law* will 
 be changed while the power whose working we 
 notice and describe by it is itself unchanged. 
 But still there is no abruptness, no arbitrary re- 
 volution, in this new aspect of Nature. The new 
 law must be conceived as springing out of our 
 new powers, just as the present law springs from 
 our present powers, when they are turned to the 
 objects which fall under them. If our present 
 body is the germ of that which will be, so is the 
 present law of that which will hereafter regulate 
 our perceptions. Thus to the Christian the laws 
 of Nature are not laws only, but prophecies. In 
 the light of the Resurrection they are symbols 
 of something broader and more glorious beyond 
 them. They do not confine hope but guide it. 
 
 11—2 
 
164 Summa 
 
 chap, ii 46. The line of thought which has been just 
 
 opened leads to the Christian solution — as far as 
 a solution is possible — of the last question which 
 arises out of the simplest views of life, our rela- 
 tion to the world; but the fuller discussion of 
 this must be reserved for a separate section. 
 Meanwhile we have gained some insight into the 
 doctrinal significance of the Resurrection in rela- 
 tion to the fulness of our future personal exist- 
 ence and to our hope of restoration before God. 
 It has been seen that our present self is essen- 
 tially twofold; and that we cannot in any way 
 conceive that we can remain the same if either 
 of the elements of which it is made up wants its 
 proper representative. The doctrine of the ■ im- 
 •' mortality of the soul* is therefore wholly insuffi- 
 cient to satisfy that desire for a life hereafter for 
 which man naturally craves. In confirmation of 
 this conclusion it has been shewn that Aristotle 
 and Plato, while approaching the subject from 
 very different points, equally indicate that no 
 arguments of pure reason can establish the future 
 personal existence of the soul, as a conscious con- 
 tinuance of our present existence. Aristotle de- 
 nies the conclusion on the strength of a direct 
 analysis: Plato clothes his instinctive hope in the 
 form of a story, confessing, as it were, that his 
 logical process fails him. Yet further the argu- 
 
Summary. 165 
 
 merits which point forward, point backward also, ohap. ii. 
 and thus fail to establish the conscious depend- 
 ence of the future on the present. Introduce the 
 belief in the Resurrection and each difficulty 
 disappears. In the Person of the Lord we see 
 how we can hereafter be the same and yet indefi- 
 nitely ennobled : how our souls and bodies may 
 be for ever united, so that the individual self 
 remains, while the body is transformed by a glo- 
 rious change. 
 
 47. In the next place it has been shewn that 
 while the possibility of sin is necessarily included 
 in the existence of a free finite will, actual sin 
 is wholly alien from the perfection of man's na- 
 ture: that in itself and in the individual sin is 
 inherently and immutably bad, though it may 
 give occasion to good by antagonism: and that 
 while it is such it must bring with it suffering, 
 which has no virtue to remove sin or the conse- 
 quences of sin, of which it is itself one. Naturally 
 then we cannot see how the evil of which we are 
 conscious can ever cease to work out torment, 
 though at the same time we instinctively turn to 
 God as a Father ready to forgive and also (but 
 how we know not) wash away sin. Again the 
 Resurrection presents to us the fulfilment of 
 man's triumph in Christ over the issues of sin, 
 
166 mmary. 
 
 chap. ii. wliich culminate in death. But here the full sig- 
 nificance of the Resurrection, and our personal 
 share in it was seen to be bound up with the 
 Apostolic teaching on the Person of Christ as un- 
 folded in His Life and ^scension, on which the 
 Church was founded, and in which we find all our 
 hopes fulfilled, in virtue of a fellowship potential 
 for the race and actual by faith for the individual. 
 € In Christ ' we can stand without fear in the very 
 presence of God. 
 
 48. Further we were led to notice some of 
 the moral consequences of a belief in the Resur- 
 rection: how it revealed a majesty in the body 
 which philosophers had denied, and the conse- 
 quent importance of every human action : how it 
 hallowed with a new sanction the idea of society 
 at the same time and in the same way as it raised 
 the dignity of the individual : how it harmon- 
 ized by the faith in the gathering together of all 
 humanity in Christ, claims which before were 
 thought to be contradictory in their origin and in 
 their fulfilment : how finally it casts a light over 
 the destiny of the world and helps us to under- 
 stand how our perception of nature will be indefi- 
 nitely raised, even if nature itself is unchanged, 
 by the ennobling of our own faculties and the re- 
 moval, or proportionate transformation of those 
 
Summary. 167 
 
 limitations by which they are at present con- chap. ii. 
 fined. 
 
 It remains to consider more in detail some of 
 these thoughts as illustrating what may be called 
 the social aspects of the Resurrection, so far as it 
 contains a revelation of our relation to the world 
 around us, and of the character of that Church 
 which is the divine witness and embodiment of 
 its truth. 
 
CHAPTER III. 
 THE RESURRECTION AND THE CHURCH. 
 
 WilUt du ins Unendliche schreiten, 
 
 Oth nur im Endlichen nack alien Seiten. 
 
 chap. iii. 1. '"PHE first announcement of the Gospel con- 
 -*- nects it with the establishment of a society. 
 
 Matt. iv. It is emphatically • the Gospel of the Kingdom.' 
 
 13 ' ■ The Kingdom of heaven is at hand ' was equally 
 
 the message of the Baptist and of Christ Himself 
 
 Matt. xi. at the beginning of His teaching. At one time 
 
 xvii 21 C ^ s Kingdom is contemplated as still future, at 
 another as already present. We are taught to pray 
 for its 'coming/ and encouraged to press as it 
 were by force and claim by violent effort a share 
 
 Matt. xiii. in its immediate blessings. Its origin, its growth, 
 the manner of its reception, the perils to which it 
 would be exposed, the variety of elements which 
 it would include, are portrayed under a rich 
 
 Luke xxii. variety of parables. ' I appoint unto you a King- 
 1 dom ' were among the last words which the Lord 
 
The Church a Kingdom. 169 
 
 addressed to His disciples ; and after His Resur- chap. hi. 
 rection, during the forty days, He spoke ' of the 
 1 things pertaining to the Kingdom of God/ The 
 idea which was thus prominent during the minis- 
 try of Christ was included in the groundwork of 
 the Apostolic preaching. The first address of St 
 Peter on the day of Pentecost declared 'Jesus to 
 1 be the Lord and Christ ' Whom God had promised 
 1 to raise up to sit on the throne of David/ The 
 first record of a mission beyond the limits of Ju- 
 daea describes Philip 'preaching the things con- 
 1 cerning the Kingdom of God/ The definite charge 
 which was brought against St Paul when he first 
 preached in Europe was that he did ' contrary to Acta xvii. 
 ' the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another J^ 2™ p * 
 1 King, one Jesus/ 
 
 2. It is unnecessary to consider the various 
 misconceptions to which this proclamation of 
 Christ's 'Kingdom* was exposed. Even to the 
 time of the last manifestation of the Lord on 
 earth, the Apostles seem to have confounded 'the 
 ' Kingdom of God ' with that which was its figure, Acts i. 3, 6. 
 'the Kingdom of Israel/ But there is not the 
 least trace that the Christian idea of a heavenly 
 kingdom was ever mixed up with direct political 
 aims. The very bitterness with which the Jewish 
 zealots at the time of their rising persecuted the 
 
170 The Church a Kingdom. 
 
 chap. in. Christians, is a sufficient proof that these ' chil- 
 1 dren of the Kingdom ' were as far as possible re- 
 moved from schemes of temporal ambition. The 
 Christian belief did away with the bitterness of 
 civil bondage, and substituted a higher hope for 
 the dreams of national enthusiasm. But none 
 the less the Kingdom whose coming believers 
 were charged to hasten, was regarded as a society 
 truly answering to the name, though its establish- 
 ment was referred to the action of Divine Provi- 
 dence, and not to human design. The kingdoms of 
 the earth were types of this kingdom which should 
 be on earth though not of the earth. In other 
 words the glorious society in which the Gospel 
 was to find its outward embodiment would have a 
 Sovereign, of whose Personal Rule His subjects 
 would be conscious and by Whose Will they would 
 be guided, an organization, by which the relative 
 functions and duties and stations of those included 
 within it would be defined and sustained, a com- 
 mon principle of action, and common rights of 
 citizenship. This was the earliest form under 
 which the establishment of a Christendom, at first 
 militant and then triumphant (though this dis- 
 tinction was but faintly perceived), was realized. 
 The old Kingdom of God whose history could be 
 traced in the Old Testament furnished the lan- 
 guage in which it was described, and the wide-felt 
 
The Church a Temple. 171 
 
 presence of the Eoman Empire gave distinctness chap. hi. 
 to the broader traits of universal dominion and 
 unity. 
 
 3. But the idea of a Kingdom was not the 
 only one under which the Church — the whole 
 society of Christians — was regarded. 'Thou art 
 'Peter {Petros)' our Lord said, in answer to the 
 confession which the great Apostle had made, 
 'and on this Rock (Petra, the living rock, from 
 ' which the Petros is hewn or taken) I will build 
 ' my Church/ This then is a second figure : the 
 church is a building, or more specially a house 
 or temple. And it is worthy of notice that 
 St Peter, in his first Epistle, brings out this con- 
 ception into the clearest light. ' Ye/ he writes, i Pet. ii. 4, 
 
 - o 
 
 'coming to the Lord, a living stone,... as living 
 'stones are built up a spiritual house/ of which 
 ' the stone which the builders disallowed is made 
 ' the head of the corner/ And St Paul yet more 
 in detail follows out the structure of this Chris- 
 tian sanctuary. Reckoning up the blessings of 
 the Gentile converts, he tells them that they are 
 now 'fellow-citizens of the saints... since they have Eph. ii. 
 'been built upon the foundation of the apostles ' 9 ~ 
 ' and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief 
 ' corner-stone, in whom every part of the build- 
 ' ing, fitly framed together, groweth unto an holy 
 
172 The Church a Kingdom. 
 
 chap. in. 'temple in the Lord; in which ye also are builded 
 
 ' together for an habitation of God in the Spirit/ 
 
 It is, however, to be observed that the same image 
 
 which is used of the society is used also of the 
 
 Heb. Hi. 6 ; individuals. We are ' Christ's house/ * God's build- 
 
 \ cor/vi?' * m g>' <tne temple of the living God/ w r here the 
 
 l6, words are used of the many to whom or in whose 
 
 person the Apostle is speaking ; and on the other 
 
 hand he asks, 'Know ye not that your body' (in 
 
 each separate case ; or better perhaps, according 
 
 to another reading, your bodies) ' are a temple of 
 
 1 the holy Spirit which is in you/ 
 
 4. This figure of a Temple has several points 
 in common with that of a Kingdom, from which 
 it is distinguished in its essential scope. In both 
 there is the design of the whole to which the 
 parts are subordinated, a variety of office and po- 
 sition in the constituent elements, a central power 
 on which the stability of all depends. But there 
 is no necessary connexion between the Temple 
 and Him Who dwells within it, such as is implied 
 in the reciprocal duties of governor and governed. 
 The house may be defiled or desolated, while the 
 occupant seeks some other abode ; but the King 
 is such in virtue of his special sovereignty. Briefly 
 the Temple prefigures the Church in its outward 
 fabric, in its splendour, in the vastness of its plan, 
 
The Church a Body. 173 
 
 in the variety of materials of which it is con- ohap. hi. 
 structed, in the consecration of all which men l G £ T ' lu# 
 
 ion. 
 
 have to God by men and so through God by His 
 Presence. It is the material as contrasted with 
 the moral type of the Christian society. 
 
 5. But there is yet another image under 
 which St Paul presents the relation of the Church 
 to God. It is not only His Kingdom, and the 
 Temple of the Holy Spirit : it is also the Body of 
 Christ. Our Lord indicated this vital connexion 
 between Himself and His disciples in the parable 
 of the Vine and the branches; and after His 
 Death and Resurrection the truth thus signified 
 grew plainer and more prominent. It was seen 
 that Christians had not only severally works to 
 do, but different works : they were felt to be not 
 branches merely, but members of Him from whom 
 they drew their life. So it is that this idea of the 
 Church as the Body of Christ includes in itself 
 both the idea of the Kingdom and that of the 
 Temple. Sovereignty and organization are im- 
 plied in the Headship of Christ, and in the 
 mutual action and dependence of the members : 
 external structure and multiformity and consecra- 
 tion, in the framework of the body, and in the 
 variety of its parts, and in the relation of the 
 whole to the vital Spirit by which it is informed 
 
174 The images of the Church 
 
 chap. in. But it also adds much to the ideas which it thus 
 harmonizes. The connexion of life is substituted 
 for that of government or occupancy. We live in 
 Christ, and He in us. We grow in Him ; and He 
 is seen more and more perfectly in the society of 
 Christians. The government of a society shews 
 something of the character of the ruler : the fabric 
 of a building something of our conception of him 
 for whom we rear it ; but the body reveals in part 
 the very person of him whose it is, and is the 
 organism by which alone his acts can be mani- 
 fested or fulfilled. 
 
 6. We are not perhaps justified in pressing 
 the details of these three images in an examina- 
 tion of the general characteristics of the Christian 
 Church, but so much at least is evident that they 
 mark it as ruled by a personal Governor, possessed 
 of an outward organization, inspired by an imme- 
 diate divine life. What light then, it may be 
 asked, does the Resurrection throw upon the 
 nature of this Kingdom of God, this Temple of 
 the Holy Spirit, this Body of Christ, for it is with 
 this subject only that we are immediately con- 
 cerned. Yet it must be observed that the ideas 
 are by no means always kept distinct. Language 
 borrowed from one is used in the development of 
 9 . '.another. 'Ye... are built up a spiritual house... 
 
in relation to the Resurrection. 175 
 
 ' ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an chap. hi. 
 
 1 holy nation, a peculiar people/ The gifts which 
 
 Christ has variously distributed among men are 
 
 'for the building up of His body/ 'Know ye not Epb.iv.12. 
 
 'that your bodies are members of Christ?... Know 15, 19. 
 
 ■ ye not that your body is (or bodies are) a temple of 
 
 1 the Holy Spirit which is in you ?' One relation 
 
 runs into the other, just as in all other cases 
 
 we stand in threefold connexion with Him who 
 
 created, redeemed and sanctified us. 
 
 7. ' My Kingdom/ our Lord said, in answer to 
 Pilate, 'is not of this world/ And yet He added 
 presently, ' Thou sayest [rightly] that I am King. 
 'For this purpose have I been born, and for this 
 ' cause have I come into the world that ;1 may 
 'bear witness to the Truth. Every one who is 
 'of the Truth heareth my voice/ The Kesurrec- 
 tion was the passage to the proper realm of truth 
 — of that which really is ; and in the contempla- 
 tion of the Resurrection the Christian learns some- 
 thing of things as they are in the sight of God. 
 The Resurrection is a new birth : to realize it as 
 an actual fact with the consequences which it in- 
 volves, is to share in it ; and thus we gain the full 
 meaning of Christ's words to the Teacher who 
 seemed to boast of the insight into spiritual things 
 which his training had given him : 'Verily, verily, John iii. 3. 
 
176 A spiritual realm opened to us. 
 
 chap. in. < I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he 
 1 cannot see the kingdom of God* — he will have no 
 faculties to apprehend that which it contains. 
 Plato, in one of his grandest myths, has repre- 
 sented the progress of unembodied spirits in the 
 train of the gods in the face of all that is. When 
 they fall to earth, as their powers fail them in 
 their course, their destiny is determined by the 
 clearness and extent of the impressions which they 
 retain. These recollections form the basis of all 
 that men know of truth. The Christian reverses 
 the idea. He is going to a kingdom of absolute 
 Truth, and is not fallen from one. The Resurrec- 
 tion is the bridge by which the passage to the 
 unseen is effected. Resting on that he looks out 
 to the heavenly state of which he is a citizen : he 
 feels the constraining force of his allegiance to a 
 spiritual King: he apprehends something of the 
 divine hierarchy to a fellowship with which he is 
 admitted, and according to whose laws he works : 
 he sees the enemies against whom he has to con- 
 
 Eph.vi. i2. tend, 'principalities, and powers, and rulers of the 
 1 darkness of the world, and spiritual wickedness 
 'in the heavenly realm/ The order, the scene, 
 the persons, the objects of this spiritual kingdom, 
 answer to what we see now on earth, but no 
 more. A new heaven and a new earth await the 
 manifestation of Christ, even as men themselves 
 
The building of the Church. 177 
 
 will be transfigured by His presence (n. §§ 44, chap. hi. 
 
 45). 
 
 8. It is obvious that there is great danger in 
 dwelling exclusively on this royal aspect of the 
 Church. It is likely that either the relations and 
 duties of men on earth will be neglected and dis- 
 paraged, or conflicts and differences here will be 
 absolutely confounded with those which are essen- 
 tially spiritual. History furnishes many examples 
 of both errors. 'The kingdom of God* has been 
 the watchword equally of those who have cast 
 aside the restraints and claims of life, and of those 
 who have sought to mould its form by the most 
 merciless fanaticism. And it was perhaps in part 
 due to their vivid anticipation of Christ's Return 
 with kingly majesty that the early Christians 
 took so little interest in civil affairs. Yet it must 
 also be remembered that in the Roman Empire 
 politics, as we understand the word, had no place; 
 and Christianity, as such, has no special relation 
 to any one form of government. In the long run 
 it tends to certain results, but in virtue of its 
 universality it is capable of the highest develop- 
 ment under any outward circumstances. 
 
 9. But the Church is not a kingdom only. 
 It is a structure complex and multiform. The 
 
 12 
 
178 The manifold building of the Church. 
 
 chap. in. society, as a whole is a dwelling-place of the 
 Holy Spirit. It is reared from age to age by the 
 
 i Cor. iii. accumulated efforts of all who serve God. Each 
 brings that which he has of special worth and it 
 is built into the fabric. All work is not the same, 
 yet all which can bear the presence of God is 
 equally employed in some or other of its parts. 
 If the notion of a Kingdom suggests the essential 
 majesty of the Church, this of a Temple brings 
 out the human interest of its progress. The 
 Church is itself the record of its history: it is a 
 monument and a shrine. Each race, each nation, 
 each century, nay each faithful workman, has left 
 some mark upon it. Time gradually harmonizes 
 parts which once seemed incongruous. Additions 
 which were at first thought to mar the symmetry 
 of the plan are felt at a later period to increase 
 its rich&esa One Spirit hallows all, and that 
 Spirit is a gift consequent on the Resurrection. 
 The local withdrawal of Christ from among men 
 in the one limited form in which they had known 
 Him, and the transfiguration of that form ' by the 
 1 glory of the Father/ were the conditions through 
 which they could realize His unseen presence 
 John xvi. through the Spirit ' It is expedient for you that 
 * I go away/ the Lord said to His disciples on the 
 eve of His Departure ; ' for if I go not away, the 
 1 Comforter will not come unto you ; but if I depart, 
 
The Church the visible body of Christ 179 
 
 * I will send Him unto you/ He first wakened chap. hi. 
 their souls to the perception of His new Life, and 
 then removed all which might still seem to con- 
 fine its manifestation. ' Cling not to me/ was the John xx. 
 loving reproof to her whose eyes he had opened R om . vi 4. 
 by a familiar word, 'for I am not yet ascended 
 1 to my Father/ No love, however true, which 
 sought to keep Him as He was seen on earth, 
 could know the fulness of Christ's majesty. The 
 Ascension was the necessary completion of His 
 work. So only could men trust in His abiding 
 power ever testing, and receiving and consecrat- 
 ing the many offerings of every generation, and 
 using all in due measure for the service of that 
 society in which He was pleased to dwell. 
 
 10. So far we have touched upon those 
 aspects of the Church which represent its eternal 
 constitution and its temporal growth. The Re- 
 surrection gives force and distinctness to both. 
 But it is more especially in the last figure of the 
 Church, as the Body of Christ, that it finds its 
 peculiar application. The idea which it expresses 
 springs indeed properly out of the belief in a 
 Risen Saviour. Anticipations of the idea are 
 found in the later discourses of Christ which have 
 been already noticed; and elsewhere He spoke of 
 His continual Presence among men in the per- 
 
 12—2 
 
180 The fundamental idea of Christianity 
 
 ciiAr. in. sons of the poor and of His ministers. But th< 
 
 and other intimations of like kind fall far short of 
 the full grandeur of the conception which St Paul 
 l.i vs open. Nor can it be without significance 
 that the revelation is made to us through him 
 
 iCor.v. 1 6. who was resolved not to know 'a Christ according 
 4 to the flesh/ and to whom the Lord was first ma- 
 nifested in the majesty of His divine glory. The 
 Church is (if we may so speak) the visible Body 
 of the Risen Christ: it is through this that He 
 still works, in this that He still lives. 
 
 11. Three principal relations are included in 
 this conception of the Gfctrcb as the Body of 
 Christ. Christians as such are essentially united 
 together in virtue of their relation to Christ, and 
 that irrespective of any feeling or will of their own. 
 Next they are bound to one another by the obli- 
 gation of mutual offices, the fulfilment of which is 
 necessary for the wellbeing of the whole. And 
 lastly, all alike derive their life from their Head 
 Who is in heaven. The Body is one : it is multi- 
 form ; and it is quickened by a power which is not 
 of itself but from above. Now this element in its 
 constitution, now that, is brought into prominence, 
 but none can be neglected if we wish to form an 
 adequate notion of its power and functions. For 
 the present it will be enough to consider a little 
 
in relation to that of Paganism, 181 
 
 more exactly the principle of unity, and that in chap. hi. 
 which the unity consists, the principle of life. The 
 multiformity of Christendom will be noticed suffi- 
 ciently while we endeavour to establish its unity. 
 
 12. Before doing so however it may be well 
 to notice how the fundamental idea of Christianity 
 as the basis of a society is related to the corre- 
 sponding ideas of Judaism and Paganism. It has 
 been frequently argued that modern civilization 
 has lost some essential element of good which 
 ancient civilization possessed. It has been said 
 that we are less self-reliant than the nations of 
 classical antiquity: less conscious of a Divine Pre- 
 sence than the Jews. Without pausing to inquire 
 whether this is so in fact or not we may be con- 
 tented to ask whether there is anything in Chris- 
 tianity itself which tends to produce such a result : 
 whether the evil or loss if it be actual is also 
 necessary. 
 
 13. The noblest lesson of Paganism is with- 
 out doubt the revelation which it makes to us of 
 the inherent dignity of human nature : of the 
 powers of endurance and self-denial and faith : of 
 the perceptions of beauty and truth : by which 
 the soul is at all times capable of asserting its 
 divine relationship. The work of Paganism was, 
 
182 The idea of Christianity in relation 
 
 iap in. W e are led to believe, the complete exhibition of 
 these natural faculties, in their strength and in 
 their weakness. The nobility of man as man and 
 as standing apart from God is that portion of its 
 teaching by which it still appeals most forcibly to 
 the sympathies of our own time. There is a dark 
 side to the picture which we are apt to forget, but 
 still there is an abiding grace and manliness in 
 classical life as it is seen in history and literature 
 and art. Unaffected interest in every human 
 feeling, manysided culture, stern and indomitable 
 will, claim our respect and awaken in us respon- 
 sive efforts. But so far as we admire Paganism 
 there is nothing in Christianity antagonistic to it. 
 Paganism closed its eyes to suffering and death. 
 Christianity takes account of the whole nature of 
 man, of its good and its evil, and justifies in the 
 face of the contradictions of life the instinct which 
 affirms its dignity. It looks death face to face 
 not as an inevitable necessity but as a final conse- 
 quence of sin, and yet realizes even now more than 
 a victory. It lays bare, what each one must feel 
 for himself, our natural infirmity, and yet ad- 
 dresses us as ' partakers of the divine nature/ It 
 represents life as a struggle, and yet as a struggle 
 only to realize the blessings which are already 
 won for man and within his reach. It claims 
 his entire homage, but at the same time it con- 
 
to those of Paganism and Judaism. 183 
 
 secrates to its own service the natural exercise of chap, hi 
 every power which he possesses, and the fulfilment 
 of every situation in which he is placed. It looks 
 upon the world as suffering with him, but it 
 regards it no less as destined to share his glorious 
 future. It differs from Paganism as a whole dif- 
 fers from a part. It takes up into itself and har- 
 monizes with the rest of our experience the. 
 isolated truths to which Paganism bears witness. 
 
 14. This is equally true of the relation in 
 which Christianity stands to Judaism. If Pa- 
 ganism is a testimony to the self-assertion and 
 independence of man, Judaism is the confession of 
 his dependence. In the first we contemplate man 
 in himself : in the other man as the creature of 
 God. In Paganism, at least when it reached its 
 full development, an appeal is made to a com- 
 mon conscience, or to necessary laws of thought, 
 or to history : in Judaism the binding message is 
 ' the Word of the Lord/ In the one men obey 
 because they recognize the essential justice of the 
 command or submit to a stronger force : in the 
 other the statutes of right are not primarily based 
 on intuitions or suggested by experience, but em- 
 bodied in a Law which is absolute, not in virtue 
 of its inherent character but as coming from Je- 
 hovah. The one, if we look to the principle by 
 
181 The principle of unity 
 
 chap in. which it lived, is a witness to human freedom: the 
 other to Divine sovereignty. And as the principles 
 which they respectively embody are eternal, so are 
 the spirit of Paganism and the spirit of Judaism. 
 The history of Christianity is little more than the 
 history of the approximate harmonization of the 
 two. Now the solution turns in this direction 
 and now in that according as the spirit of Greece 
 or of Rome prevails — the theology of Athanasius 
 or of Augustine — but apostolic Christianity recog- 
 nizes and hallows both elements. The coming of 
 the Lord invests humanity, even as it is, with a 
 more awful majesty than man could have claimed 
 for himself ; and at the same time connects the 
 realization of that majesty with the direct revela- 
 tion of the Divine Will. Paganism proclaims the 
 grandeur of man : Judaism the supremacy of God. 
 Christianity accepts the antithesis and vindicates 
 by the message of the Resurrection the grandeur 
 of man in and through God. 
 
 15. This then is the work of Christianity, 
 first to establish the common dignity of men as 
 m<m, and to place on a sure basis all purely human 
 virtues ; and next to connect the life of men 
 with its source and consummation and bring it 
 into fellowship with God. Both these results are 
 grounded on the historic facts of the Gospel. 
 
in Christianity. 185 
 
 The unity of the Christian Society, to which cuap. hi. 
 potentially all men belong, depends not on any 
 personal feeling but on a common relation in 
 which men as belonging to the society stand to 
 God. And the reality of this divine fellowship is 
 at once the seal of th£ nobility of man and the 
 pledge of the possibility of its final perfection. 
 
 16. 'As the body is one/ St Paul writes, " Cor - *«• 
 
 12, 13. 
 
 'and hath many members, and all the members 
 ' of the 1 body being many are one body: so also is 
 
 • Christ. For in one Spirit we all were baptized 
 'into {i.e. by baptism incorporated in) one body, 
 
 * whether we be Jews or Greeks, whether we be 
 ■ bond or free ; and were all made to drink 2 one 
 1 Spirit.' Here the unity is seen to spring out of a 
 definite outward act, and the participation in a 
 spiritual blessing consequent upon it. No other 
 conditions are added. Yet it must be observed that 
 according to the formula which Christ Himself en- 
 joined, Baptism includes a profession of faith, such 
 as has been connected with it in all ages, in which 
 the historic facts of the Lord's Life are plainly 
 set forth. Hence in another place St Paul says 
 
 more fully : ' There is one body, and one spirit, E ph- It. 4- 
 1 even as ye were called in one hope of your calling : 
 1 one Lord, one faith, one baptism.' The act once 
 
 1 Omit one. 2 Omit into. 
 
f86 The principle of unity 
 
 chap. in. done brings with it, in virtue of Christ's work, fel- 
 Roiu. vi. 3, lowsliip with Him, in which lies unity. 'Know ye 
 1 not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus 
 1 Christ, were baptized into His death ? Therefore 
 1 we were buried with Him by baptism into death; 
 1 that like as Christ was raised up from the dead 
 * by the glory of the Father, even so we also should 
 4 walk in newness of life/ Here the issue is viewed 
 from the human side. It is ours to realize in 
 action the fulness of the heavenly life of which 
 we are made partakers. Elsewhere it is viewed 
 in relation to God, and in this aspect all is accom- 
 Eph. ii. 5, plished once for all. 'When we were dead in 
 'sins [God] quickened us together with Christ, 
 1 and raised us up together [with Him] and made 
 us sit together in the realms of heaven in Chris! 
 1 Je> 
 
 17. The participation in Christ's Death and 
 Resurrection through Baptism is then the final 
 condition of unity : to work out the Resurrection 
 in life the means and measure of its preservation. 
 For unity is not uniformity. Differences of race, 
 class, social order obviously have no influence 
 upon it. They are of earth only. But more than 
 this, it is consistent with serious differences in 
 the apprehension of the common faith on which 
 it reposes. St Paul naturally insists on the re- 
 
in Christianity. 187 
 
 moval of the partition between Jew and Gentile chap. in. 
 by the Death of Christ, whereby He 'made ofEpK.fi. 15. 
 ' twain one new man/ Primarily without doubt he 
 regarded the contrast as it was before the Gospel; 
 but it seems equally certain that he included 
 within the scope of Christ's reconciliation those 
 diversities of opinion by which the Jewish and 
 Gentile Churches were separated. The Apostles GaL ii. 7 ff. 
 of the circumcision recognized in him the aposto- 
 late of the uncircumcision ; and he gladly received 
 from them 'the right hand of fellowship.' The 
 divergences of practice between the teachers, and 
 of belief to a certain extent between the disciples 
 of the two schools, were not sufficient to destroy 
 their true unity. Love still found its expression 
 among them in acts of charity. It was only Gal. ii. 10 
 when the attempt was made to enforce, one partial 
 system as universal that the unity of the whole 
 was endangered. The first serious effort to estab- 
 lish uniformity threatened to end (as it did after 
 the time of the Apostles) in a schism. 
 
 18. It may not, indeed, be a mere fancy to 
 regard the manifold appearances of the Lord after 
 His Resurrection as prefiguring in some way the 
 varieties which should exist in after time in His 
 Church. The unity of His Person was not in any 
 way impaired, and yet He shewed Himself to His 
 
188 The principle of life 
 
 chap. in. disciples in different 'forms/ And it may be still 
 Mark xvi. that the faithful eye can see a Body of Christ 
 where His Presence is hidden from others. For 
 even in the one body, there are many bodies ; 
 and as the whole Church is sometimes contem- 
 plated in its completeness as distinct from Christ, 
 Kj.li. v. 27. though most closely bound to Him, as His bride; 
 
 Anoc xxi 
 
 2, 9. so also is the same true of separate Churches. ' Ye 
 
 1 ( «>r. xii. \ are a body {not the body) of Christ, and members 
 'in particular' St Paul says to the Church of 
 Corinth. The definite article destroys the force 
 of his argument. And so again in his second 
 1 Cor. xi. Epistle : ' I espoused you ' — the congregation to 
 which he is writing — 'to one husband, that I may 
 'present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.' Thus 
 the whole is not only relatively complete but it is 
 made up of parts (so to speak) similar to itself. 
 And this is true if we regard even the ultimate 
 members of which it is composed. The individual 
 i hristian — a temple of the Holy Spirit as well as 
 a living stone of a more glorious Temple — is like 
 the special Church of which he is a member, even 
 this is like that Universal Church in which it 
 discharges some special function. 
 
 19. But while the Christian, the separate 
 Churches, and the Universal Church have seve- 
 rally, in some sense, a completeness in themselves, 
 
 2. 
 
in Christianity. 189 
 
 yet their real life is solely in their connexion with chap. hi. 
 
 Christ ' the Head of the man/ and * the Head of i Cor. xi. 3. 
 
 'the Church/ From him flows that energy by Eph'.iv.i6.' 
 
 which every member is enabled to discharge its 
 
 function effectually and in due proportion to 
 
 the harmonious working of the whole : from Him, 
 
 that power of love by which the several parts are 
 
 fitted and knit together: from Him that vital 
 
 force by which the multiform body 'increaseth 
 
 'with the increase of God/ Each phase of this 
 
 divine Life is distinctly marked. 'The bread' — Jolmvi.51. 
 
 the heavenly manna — 'which I will give/ the 
 
 Lord said, ' is my flesh, for the life of the world/ 
 
 — ' Because I live, ye [my disciples] shall live John xiv. 
 
 'also' — 'I am the Resurrection and the Life/ j^' hn xi 
 
 'Ye died/ St Paul writes to the Colossians, 'and J?; ... 
 
 9 Col. 111. 3, 4. 
 
 'your life hath been hidden with Christ in Goi>: 
 
 'but when Christ, is manifested, our Life, then 
 
 ' shall ye also be manifested with Him in glory/ 
 
 ' It is no longer I who live/ he says in another Gal. ii. 20. 
 
 place, 'but Christ liveth in me/ 'He that hath \ 2 ° 
 
 ' the Son hath life ; but he that hath not the Son 
 
 ' of God hath not life/ 
 
 20. It is then necessary to bear two things 
 in mind in treating of the Unity of the Church. 
 The Unity of the whole is consistent with a wide 
 variety of parts, each having to a certain degree 
 
190 Essential unity does not 
 
 chap. in. a corresponding unity in itself. And next, the 
 essential bond of union is not external but spi- 
 ritual : it consists not in one organization but in 
 a common principle of life. Its expression lies in 
 a personal relation to Christ and not in any out- 
 ward system. Of the life of the Church part is 
 open, part is hidden. We can see divisions, dif- 
 ferences, limitations ; but all that is eternal and 
 infinite in it, all that controls actions which per- 
 plex us and harmonizes discords which are un- 
 resolved to our senses, is not to be perceived on 
 , earth but is with Christ in heaven. 
 
 21. It follows necessarily from what has been 
 said that external, visible, unity is not required 
 for the essential unity of the Church. To recur 
 to the example which has been already used, the 
 congregations of Jewish and Gentile Christians 
 were no less One in Christ, though the outward 
 fellowship between them was imperfect or wanting : 
 their common life lay deeper than the controversies 
 which tended to keep them apart. Their isola- 
 tion was a proof of imperfection, but not of death. 
 What errors are deadly, it does not fall to our 
 part to attempt to determine. It is enough to 
 observe that differences of opinion which were 
 once thought by many to be fatal to unity were 
 really consistent with it. The promise of Christ 
 
require external unity. 191 
 
 does not reach to the unity of the outward fold cHAr. in. 
 at any time. ' Other sheep/ He said, ' I have, j h. x. 16. 
 ' which are not of this fold : them also I must 
 ' bring, and they shall hear my voice ; and there 
 ' shall become one flock, one Shepherd' — one flock 
 in however many folds it be gathered, because it 
 listens to the voice of the One Shepherd. 
 
 22. If the true unity of the whole Church, 
 which is derived from the participation in the 
 Spirit of Christ, is compatible with the existence 
 of outward divisions on earth, it is no less com- 
 patible also with the existence of independent 
 centres of local and partial authority in its mani- 
 fold organization. Christ Himself is the One 
 Head ; and He left no single successor to repre- 
 sent in outward form the relation in which He 
 stands to the Body. For a time indeed an idea 
 seems to have prevailed in one province of Chris- 
 tendom that the office of Christ (if we may so 
 speak) and not of the Apostles only was to be 
 perpetuated. The Jewish Bishops of Jerusalem, 
 who were taken as long as might be from the 
 family of the Lord, were held by many to be (even 
 though they did not claim the title themselves) 
 His successors. They were ■ bishops of bishops/ 
 Their authority as far as can be learnt now was 
 supposed to extend over the whole world and not 
 
192 /• external unify 
 
 ( hap. in. to be confined to a single diocese or district. Tin v 
 symbolized the idea of an earthly kingdom which 
 was characteristic of the party who professed to 
 maintain their opinions. It would be idle to 
 speculate on the form which this belief might 
 have taken if Jerusalem had not been destroyed. 
 As it is, it is impossible not to feel that the effect 
 of the desolation of 'the Holy City* must have 
 been to chasten and purify (as soon as they could 
 bear the discipline) those who had hoped to mould 
 the Christian Church after the pattern of J u« la ism. 
 The conception of unity based on a historic and 
 divine succession in the religious centre of tin 
 world was proved to be no part of the true idea 
 of the Church. The thoughts of men were turned 
 with a deeper faith to that ' Jerusalem which is 
 'above/ to which from the first St Paul had di- 
 rected them. 
 
 The outward unity whirl i was aimed at 
 in the early Jewish Church was based upon a 
 religious idea. The outward unity which after- 
 wards grew up round the Roman Church sprang 
 from political influences. The two systems are 
 essentially distinct in their origin, though finally 
 they can be traced in theory to the same prin- 
 ciples. The Roman system became in the end 
 what the Jewish system was from the first, but 
 
was aimed at. 193 
 
 with one remarkable difference. The priesthood chap. hi. 
 which was in both cases the visible representative 
 and instrument of the theocracy was limited in 
 Judaism to a distinct family succession : in Ro- 
 manism the succession was spiritual and effec- 
 tually disconnected from hereditary ties. In the 
 Christian Church of Jerusalem the fleshly descent 
 was observed for several generations, but there is 
 no trace of a similar custom at Rome. The idea 
 of spiritual supremacy seems indeed absolutely to 
 exclude it. But it must be enough to have in- 
 dicated the external contrast between systems 
 essentially similar. This is not the place to follow 
 out the steps of their parallel but converse de- 
 velopment. Nor can we dwell on the marvellous 
 process by which the Roman Church was pre- 
 pared for the preservation of Christianity on the 
 dissolution of the Empire. It would be foreign to 
 our purpose to trace the steps by which the bishop 
 of the imperial city received one by one the pre- 
 rogatives of sovereignty, and in due time seated 
 himself on the vacant throne of the Caesars. It 
 would be equally out of place to attempt any 
 estimate of the strength which the mediaeval 
 Church thus received for the execution of the 
 work with which it was charged. The facts are 
 of vast significance, and occupy so large a space 
 in the history of Christendom that they may not 
 
 13 
 
194 The extent of permissible variation 
 
 chap. in. lightly be passed over. They formed, as many 
 will believe, part of the providential scheme of 
 the historical growth of the Church. But the 
 unity to which they led was no necessary part of 
 the constitution of the Church. It answered to 
 the one Empire of the first age, and not to the 
 many kingdoms of the maturer life of Europe. 
 It supplied a bond between the disorganized na- 
 tions till the state-systems into which they were 
 formed were firmly consolidated. Under its pro- 
 tection the Romanic and German elements were 
 allowed to gather strength till they were ready 
 to fulfil their independent office. But without 
 dwelling upon this temporal function of the ex- 
 ternal unity of the Christian society we can at 
 least see from the fall of its prototype after the 
 Jewish Return (i. §§ 27 f.) that the spiritual unity 
 of the Church is independent of it. The outward 
 unity arose from historic causes: it was broken 
 by historic causes. No external organization can 
 supersede the original relation in which the So- 
 ciety stands to its Founder. The gift of the Holy 
 Spirit was the outward sign of the elevation of 
 humanity to glory at the right hand of God : the 
 sharing in that gift is the life of the Church : the 
 absolute oneness of the source from which the gift 
 flows is the ground of essential unity in the con- 
 gregations of which the Church is composed. 
 
not to be determined antecedently. 195 
 
 24 But though the principle of the unity of chap. hi. 
 the Christian Church is spiritual and not neces- 
 sarily connected with uniformity of constitution or 
 even with intercommunion, it by no means follows 
 that the outward organization of the whole of the 
 constituent Churches is a matter of indifference. 
 On the contrary the direct teaching of the Resur- 
 rection points to the inherent connexion between 
 the outward and the spiritual, the organization 
 and the life. The range of variation in the con- 
 stitution of the Christian societies must be limited 
 by their fitness to embody the fundamental ideas 
 of Christianity. Of this fitness history on a large 
 scale gives the final j udgment. Whatever may be 
 the immediate issue of controversy, however false 
 may be the issues on which it is decided, however 
 blinding the influences by which its progress has 
 been modified, in the end it is seen in its true 
 light, and the final judgment which is ratified by 
 general practice or belief is commonly the true 
 one. In this sense history is the arbiter not of 
 truth but of the right embodiment of truth. The 
 early records of the Church are little more than the 
 records of conflicts which once seemed doubtful; 
 but in each case that which had in it the element 
 of permanence lived on, and Catholicity stood in 
 full strength against the broken forms of partial 
 and erroneous teachings. 
 
 13—2 
 
196 Possible divisions illustrated 
 
 chap. in. 25. It is possible perhaps to extend this view 
 of a historic development of Christianity to later 
 ages. It seems difficult to believe that the Greek 
 and Latin Churches include the only two great 
 aspects of Christian truth, so that it remains for 
 us at present only to recur to the principles on 
 which they were built, and to strive vainly to re- 
 produce in another period a transcript of the past. 
 The vast advances of civilization, the further 
 growth of national life, the wider range of know- 
 ledge, which brings with it the recognition of the 
 importance of special views, seem to force upon 
 us the conviction that the various Churches of 
 modern times fulfil under the changed conditions 
 of society the same functions as could be discharg- 
 ed in earlier times by a single Church. Even in 
 the history of Judaism something of the same 
 kind may be noticed. In no way, as we should 
 judge, could the possibility of variation, and still 
 more of division be excluded with greater certainty 
 than by the institutions of the Jewish Church, 
 and yet in that outward union was soon broken, 
 and the rupture (so to speak) sanctioned. The 
 Temple — the permanent (i. § 25) symbol of unity 
 — was hardly completed, before a large part of the 
 nation was shut out from the use of it. The poli- 
 tical and religious schism of which Israel was a 
 monument was not passed over without rebuke, 
 
by the history of the Jewish Church. 197 
 
 but in spite of that a distinct spiritual work was CHAP - IIL 
 carried on in Israel, not less blessed by outward 
 signs than that which was simultaneously accom- 
 plished in Judah. At a later time the office which 
 was discharged by the Jews of the Dispersion, and 
 specially by the Alexandrine Jews, in modifying 
 and extending their traditional faith, was still 
 more manifestly recognized by God in the provi- 
 dential office which He allowed it to fulfil for the 
 spread of Christianity. Here as elsewhere it seems 
 as if the sins and wilfulnesses of men gave occasion 
 to the accomplishment of the Divine plans. The 
 rebellion of Israel, the schism of Alexandria, the 
 permanent settlement of Jews throughout the 
 East and West which involved a violation of large 
 parts of the Mosaic law, were in themselves evils, 
 and had their spring in selfishness and disobe- 
 dience, but none the less they served to work out 
 a vast counsel, which, as far as we can see, could 
 not otherwise have been perfected. In the his- 
 tory of that earlier kingdom of God, which was 
 essentially outward, we are taught by special ex- 
 amples not to judge every thing by our own 
 standard of unity. At least no argument can be 
 drawn from the circumstances which attend the 
 rise of any great movement against the impor- 
 tance of the part which it may have to discharge 
 in the furtherance of the purposes of God. 
 
198 Tlie admission of variation 
 
 chap. in. 26. But it may be said that such a view 
 sanctions sectarianism. If we are to suppose that 
 the form of the Christian Church in each nation 
 will (within certain limits) embody the common 
 peculiarities of the national character, just as on 
 a larger scale the Greek Church is Orthodox and 
 the Latin Church Catholic, differences will still 
 exist in the body thus formed. Each nation will 
 include men most widely at variance in their re- 
 ligious tendencies. Are they then to be held 
 blameless if they seek to attach themselves to a 
 communion which expresses most clearly their 
 own views ? The national character is not reflect- 
 ed in them; and the same general principle which 
 justifies the formation of a separate national 
 Church may be appealed to in support of an in- 
 definite number of subordinate associations. 
 
 27. Disregarding for the present all con- 
 siderations of ecclesiastical organization, it may be 
 sufficient for us to answer to such a line of reason- 
 ing that it applies equally well to all social com- 
 binations. No one will deny that there is a 
 tendency in every nation towards the establish- 
 ment of a government best suited to it. This 
 tendency which may be latent in the mass, though 
 really there, will be developed most strongly in 
 those who are the true leaders of popular thought. 
 
no sanction of Sectarianism, 199 
 
 And though various obstacles may hinder or mo- chap. hi. 
 dify the embodiment of the idea which they re- 
 present, in the end it finds an adequate expres- 
 sion. But even then individuals in the state 
 will find themselves at variance with the consti- 
 tution. This divergence however will not release 
 them from the duties of loyal obedience, nor yet 
 deprive the government of its right to be regarded 
 as the representation of the national feelings. The 
 state though made up of individuals has an exist- 
 ence of its own. The individual will exercise 
 his full influence in preparing for further changes, 
 but meanwhile the whole claims a sacrifice of the 
 part. It is so also in the case of a national Church. 
 No general principles can be laid down to justify 
 a schism or a revolution. The future alone can 
 decide on the sufficiency of the alleged causes 
 from which they arose. And in many cases the 
 issue which is sanctioned by experience may have 
 been occasioned though not caused by selfish 
 motives. 
 
 28. History has in fact sanctioned divisions 
 in the Christian Church whatever we may think 
 of the events which first led to them, or of the 
 actors by whom they were made : however deeply 
 we may deplore the loss of that outward fellow- 
 ship which would, if it could have been preserved, 
 
200 Progress implies antagonism 
 
 cnAP. in. have increased a thousandfold the power of the 
 Church upon the world; yet it is impossible not 
 to feel that God has revealed His purposes and 
 furthered His work not only in spite of, but even 
 through the separate societies which have seve- 
 rally appropriated this or that part of the whole 
 truth as the characteristic object of their devout 
 study. And even without regarding the lessons 
 of the past it is hard to see how the fulness of 
 Christianity could have been manifested among 
 men otherwise than by antagonism and conflict. 
 Antagonism is the preliminary to our apprehen- 
 sion of anything which is not itself absolutely 
 bounded by our finite powers. Every spiritual 
 truth can be followed out to a final antithesis; 
 and this antithesis finds its most complete ex- 
 pression in societies rather than in individuals. 
 
 29. The same law which holds in all other 
 fields of human activity, holds also in the noblest. 
 The condition of advance in the comprehension 
 of the whole Gospel is the special mastery of its 
 parts in life. Progress implies a separate deve- 
 lopment of powers. The tendency to division 
 grows as knowledge widens. There was a time 
 when all nature seemed to lie within the range 
 of one mind. Deeper inquiry has shewn that 
 each fragment includes phenomena which may 
 
and individuality. 201 
 
 occupy a lifetime. And so it is in religion. The chap. hi. 
 complexity of modern society, which is in part a 
 creation of Christianity, lays before us endless 
 problems of right and duty, and opens countless 
 avenues for the entrance of truth into the mani- 
 fold life of men which could not have been pre- 
 sented under simpler conditions of existence. As 
 a necessar} r consequence of this, each nation, each 
 association, each man has, in proportion to the 
 distinctness of character, a tendency to do one 
 thing; and the tendency to do it springs (as a 
 general rule and upon a large scale) from the 
 fitness for doing it. There is thus, in virtue of 
 the universality of Christianity, a constant ap- 
 proximation towards the complete manifestation 
 of its power. And when each age and race and 
 individual has fulfilled its proper function — and 
 so far as it fulfils it — a glorious harmony must 
 result, which is true Catholicity. 
 
 30. The recognition of some such historic 
 development of Christianity vaiying according to 
 the wants of particular ages or races, as belonging 
 to its present form, restores to the divided churches 
 a true unity. One of the earliest images under 
 which the unity of Christendom was described 
 was that of many streams flowing from one source. 
 The longer the streams flow, the greater will be 
 
202 The essential unity of the Church 
 
 chap. in. their divergence; but the divergence is due to 
 progress and does not in any way destroy the 
 original unity of the waters which pass along the 
 various courses. But the streams will not always 
 be divided. They start from one source and they 
 end in one ocean. They have been united out- 
 wardly, and they will again be united. Mean- 
 while the fashion of their currents is moulded by 
 the country through which they pass, and this in 
 turn furnishes the peculiar elements which they 
 bear down to their common resting-place to form 
 the foundations of a world to come. 
 
 31. There is indeed much of human selfish- 
 ness in the present administration and conduct of 
 Christian societies, even as there was in their 
 establishment and organization. It is not argued 
 that the divisions as we see them are not de- 
 formed by much that is unchristian. The petty 
 rivalries of the day are an evil, though they are 
 an evil which may be borne. But the line of 
 thought which has been opened leads to a trustful 
 and reasonable view of Christendom. It enables 
 us to regard the progress of the Church as we 
 regard the progress of civil society. It encou- 
 rages us to extend our sympathies beyond the 
 limits of our own communion : to look forth with- 
 out despair upon a world, in part hardly reached 
 
seen in its external development. 203 
 
 by the very sound of Christ's message, in part CHAP - m 
 divided as to the exact meaning of it. It teaches 
 us to watch with patience the slow and painful 
 and wavering advance of truth through long ages, 
 as falling in with what we observe in nature of 
 the enormous scale and gradual progress of the 
 accomplishment of His operations (i. §§ 2, 3). The 
 example of the Jewish Church, the legible chroni- 
 cle of past centuries, shew that under circum- 
 stances similar to those which exist now, though 
 simpler and narrower, God wrought out His work 
 and used the fruits of man's wilfulness and one- 
 sidedness for the accomplishment of His designs. 
 So we trust it will be now, and in confidence we 
 can fulfil the task which we find ready to our 
 hands, without distrusting the means placed within 
 our reach for furthering the coming of the King- 
 dom of Christ. 
 
 32. Some law of development Christianity 
 must have. The Christianity of the first age, 
 regarded as a whole, is not the Christianity of 
 any later age; and no view of the Church can 
 be complete or satisfactory which does not include 
 and explain the principle of the change. It is 
 impossible for a Christian of today to date the 
 descent of his faith from any critical epoch in 
 modern times, and neglect ten or fifteen centuries 
 
20-i The development one of 
 
 chap, iil as a mere parenthesis in the history of the Ca- 
 tholic Church. All the past is included in the 
 present. The Reformation was the fruit of ages 
 gone by no less than the germ which should 
 spring to maturity in ages to come. There can 
 be no suspension in the fulfilment of the divine 
 promise, however varied may be the forms under 
 which it is accomplished. The leaven still works 
 in the manifold mass : the seed advances stage by 
 stage towards its ripe perfection: the tree grows 
 under every change of season and climate, and 
 offers shelter to all who repose beneath its 
 branches. Each image under which we are taught 
 to contemplate the function of the Church pre- 
 sents at once an element of permanence and an 
 element of change. There is the essential life 
 by which the whole body is quickened, absolutely 
 one and immutable, and the organization which 
 the vital force moulds and by which it reveals 
 itself, which is mutable and fashioned out of ele- 
 ments earthly and transitory. But even so the 
 continuity of the organization is necessary for the 
 preservation of the complex life. 
 
 33. The principle of life is one and immutable. 
 In this there is no development. The faith which 
 is written in the facts of the Gospel, and the im- 
 mediate apostolic interpretation of them, admit 
 
organization not of dogma. 205 
 
 of no necessary and authoritative additions. A CHAP 1IL 
 dogmatic development of Christianity, in the sense 
 of an increase of the fundamental doctrines of the 
 faith, is foreign to the whole spirit of the apostolic 
 writings, and is itself inconceivable without a new 
 revelation. Such a development would only take 
 place by the addition of new dogmas in virtue of 
 the direct action of an adequate power, or by 
 deductions from existing dogmas. But both me- 
 thods are excluded by the nature of the case. 
 Christianity rests essentially on facts. Its ele- 
 mentary doctrines are presented to us in the 
 shape of facts ; and thus, even if any central 
 power existed with absolute dogmatic power, new 
 facts would be required for the basis of new doc- 
 trines, for the Apostles declare with unmistakeable 
 distinctness the full significance of the Incarnation 
 and the Mission of the Holy Spirit. And again, 
 the truths which answer to the facts of the Gospel 
 belong in themselves to a higher form of exist- 
 ence, and cannot be brought within the domain 
 of our powers of reasoning. Every process which 
 we pursue involves necessarily at each step limita- 
 tions (as, for example, of time and space) to which 
 the Divine Being is not subject. Every conclu- 
 sion, therefore, which we form, so far as it is 
 presented as an absolute truth, must have in it 
 an element of error. Indeed, on reflection, it 
 
206 The development of the Cliurch corresponds 
 
 chap. in. cannot but seem infinitely presumptuous that we 
 should venture to speculate on that of which, even 
 in its simplest form, we can give no positive con- 
 ception. Nor is there any characteristic by which 
 the apostolic writings are more clearly distin- 
 guished from the greatest writings of masters of 
 theology than the absence of secondary deductions 
 in them from the principles which they enforce. 
 In this respect they differ equally from the meta- 
 physical and speculative theology of the East, and 
 from the moral and legal theology of the West. 
 They contain a record of facts, and an immediate 
 application of the facts, but no more : life and 
 not thought is the object to which they primarily 
 minister, and so they minister (as no other writ- 
 ings ever could do) to thought through life. 
 They set forth with simple distinctness that a fact 
 or truth is, but not how it is or why it is. What 
 there is more than this in later speculations, how- 
 ever beautiful and however precious it may be, is 
 wholly different in kind. From the first the 
 difference has been instinctively felt. The records 
 of the most critical struggle for the truth in the 
 history of the Church shew how wide-spread was 
 the unwillingness to introduce into the historic 
 creed of Catholic Christendom a single word which 
 was not found in the Scriptures though it was the 
 necessary exponent of their teaching in opposition 
 
to the general progress of nations. 207 
 
 to error : the language of the noblest champion chap. hi. 
 of orthodoxy shews how far he was willing to 
 dispense with the acceptance of a word when the 
 fact which it imperfectly expressed was admitted. 
 
 34. But while the principle of life, the record 
 of the facts of the Gospel, remains the same, the 
 form in which it is embodied may change. Thus 
 we naturally turn to history as shewing the con- 
 ditions and ruling the mode of the development 
 of Christianity. Here we can see on a large 
 scale how the same truths are apprehended by 
 different races, how they are embodied under 
 different circumstances and according to different 
 modes of thought, how they conquer, and array 
 themselves in the spoils of the conquered. No 
 one would deny that in successive ages special 
 aspects or parts of Truth are brought out. The 
 general outline of the history, including both the 
 history of dogma and the history of practice, has a 
 necessary connexion with that of civil and intel- 
 lectual history. The one is, so to speak, a func- 
 tion of the other. And it follows that as we can 
 trace in the general condition of man a constant 
 advance towards a true fulfilment of the capabili- 
 ties of his nature, so we may hope for a corre- 
 sponding progress in the Church, towards that 
 ideal which is held before us in Scripture as its 
 
208 The progress of the whole includes 
 
 chap. in. proper consummation. Advance in the first case 
 is not only consistent with wars, revolutions, iso- 
 lated action, but (as far as we can judge) is even 
 dependent on these which we are tempted to call 
 hindrances in its way. And it may be so with 
 Christianity. The divisions and rivalries and 
 heresies and schisms by which the Church is torn 
 may be means towards the fulfilment of its office. 
 As we look back we can scarcely doubt that it 
 is so. The storm no less than the sunshine is 
 needed that the rainbow, the visible token of 
 Gods covenant with man, may be seen upon the 
 cloud. 
 
 35. It is indeed impossible to regard the 
 Church as a body without recognising the neces- 
 sity of a constant change in its organization. 
 Growth itself is change ; and in proportion as the 
 life of the body is complex we may expect the 
 forms in which it is clothed to be varied. There 
 are times when the individual is forgotten in the 
 society, and conversely when the society is for- 
 gotten in the individual. In the apostolic view 
 of the future of Christianity there is a distinct 
 recognition of a progressive work in both. The 
 life of the Church is continuous even as the life 
 of the man ; but with this difference (as we have 
 seen, § 18,) that this life is manifested not in one 
 
transitional developments of parts. 209 
 
 outward embodiment, but in many, which are chap. hi. 
 severally similar to the whole which they combine 
 to form. 
 
 36. It is no part of our task to attempt to 
 follow out in detail the various phases of the life 
 of the Christian Churches. But it would not be 
 difficult to shew that institutions or dogmas have 
 wrought a most important work for the cause of 
 Christ in one age, which in another have been 
 converted into obstacles to the full apprehension 
 of the Truth. There is always a great danger 
 that that which has been found of critical use at 
 one time will be pronounced necessary for all time. 
 Mistaken gratitude changes the outward means of 
 deliverance into an idol. The organization through 
 which the spirit once worked is reckoned holy, 
 even when the spirit has left it. And thus that 
 which once was a development of life becomes a 
 coiTuption, not because it has (in every case) 
 changed in itself, but because it stands in a different 
 relation to the whole. The work of the mediaeval 
 Church (for example) required modes of operation 
 which could not be retained now without a faith- 
 less neglect of the lesson which God has taught 
 us in the last four centuries. The same pheno- 
 menon meets us at every step in the economy of 
 individual life. The seed from which rises the 
 
 14 
 
210 How far this development 
 
 < hap. in. fruit-bearing tree, to which the visible society of 
 Christendom is likened, gives birth to a thousand 
 successive organizations, from the seed-leaf to the 
 flower, which fall away when their peculiar office 
 is fulfilled. They perish, but their work remains, 
 and remains because they perish. 
 
 37. This consideration brings with it the 
 answer to a general objection which may be urged 
 against the belief in a divine historical develop- 
 ment of Christianity. It may be said that the 
 development is due to the imperfection of man : 
 that so far from carrying forward the perception 
 of the Truth, he lowers the truth to his own level 
 and confines it in a form borrowed from his own 
 weakness. The objection is true if it be directed 
 to any particular point of the development. The 
 Truth itself is infinite, and it is simply because 
 the powers of man are imperfect and finite that 
 any development is necessary. He can only 
 realize step by step, and by successive efforts, 
 what is indeed from the beginning. According to 
 the position in which he finds himself, he takes 
 now this, now that fragment of the whole, because 
 it meets his wants. Every embodiment of the 
 Truth must be wrought out in this way. And the 
 nearest approximation which we can form to the 
 complete truth is by the combination of the par- 
 
is due to the infirmity of man. 211 
 
 tial realizations of it which history records. The chap, in 
 imperfection of each stage of the development is 
 then only perilous when an attempt is made to 
 transfer the forms of thought or practice of a parti- 
 cular period to another, without any regard to their 
 bearing upon the whole life of the time. The 
 interpretation of ecclesiastical history, like the 
 interpretation of Scripture, is based upon a pro- 
 portion. Neither admits a rigid literalism. The 
 training of the child and of the man will be dif- 
 ferent, if both are according to the same law ; but 
 the man may learn still (if he reads them rightly) 
 from the lessons of the child. 
 
 38. It is not denied that there will be a 
 tendency in man not only to seize that element 
 in the Truth which he himself needs, but also to 
 exaggerate its importance, to array it in fancies 
 of his own, to transmit his embodiment of it as 
 an inviolable heritage to all who shall come after. 
 If it w r ere not so, superstition would have no 
 vitality. But while we look to history for the 
 record of the continuous growth of the Church, 
 we carry the Holy Scriptures with us, as the test 
 whereby to try the essential value of each de- 
 velopment. The history of the Old Covenant is 
 enacted afresh in the history of the New. The 
 fulness of the apostolic writings has not yet been 
 
 14—2 
 
212 Scripture the test of true development. 
 
 in exhausted in the life of eighteen centuries. The 
 providence of God is at every stage interpreted by 
 His Word 
 
 39. The same test which is applied to the 
 past history of the Church, can be applied to the 
 present. The vast complexity of modern life, the 
 various degrees of national culture, the broad 
 differences between class and class in the same 
 nation, set before us simultaneously, so to speak, 
 distinct periods of the simpler life of the ancient 
 world. We live (and the statement is not a mere 
 figure) in the presence of many ages. We cannot be 
 
 prised then if we see around us many Christian 
 societies distinct, and subserving in virtue of their 
 • listinctness to distinct types of thought and feel- 
 ing. Differences which once were found in the 
 same external body are now seen embodied in 
 separate societies. We lose something by the 
 change, but we gain more. We are led to look 
 for the spiritual basis of unity instead of reposing 
 in the fact of formal unity. And more than this. 
 The full development of each part is best secured 
 by independent action. Division (if we regard 
 the imperfection of our nature) appears to be 
 the preliminary of that noblest catholicity, which 
 will issue from the separate fulfilment by each 
 part in due measure of its proper function towards 
 the whole. 
 
Churches 'redeem each other.* 213 
 
 40. It has been nobly said that ' nations re- chap. hi. 
 'deem each other.' One supplies that which an- 
 other lacks in moral character and purpose ; and 
 the existence of a deficiency in one place is not 
 unfrequently the stimulus and the occasion for 
 the display of the corresponding virtue in another. 
 At least it is evident that we cannot understand 
 how with our present powers the full grandeur of 
 humanity could be exhibited or developed except 
 by the coexistence of many peoples distinct and 
 even antagonistic. And that which is true of 
 humanity in a political or social aspect is true of 
 it also in a religious aspect. Separate organiza- 
 tions appear to be as necessary for the complete 
 manifestation of the many sides of Christian truth 
 in relation to man, as they are confessedly for the 
 manifestation of national life. But we do not 
 rest in the contemplation of a divided humanity 
 or of a divided Church. Under the varieties of 
 race and character there exist tokens of an essen- 
 tial union which may yet be realized and towards 
 which the current of events is ever turned. There 
 are indications, faint it may be and often baffling, 
 of a common life grander than the life of men and 
 the life of nations, which is struggling to assert 
 its sovereignty. And in the Church there is yet 
 more than this, the certainty of the presence of a 
 Holy Spirit who ' is able to subdue all things unto 
 
'21± Grounds of hope in the 
 
 ; in. * Himself.' But whether we look to nations or 
 churches, it is needful that we should pause before 
 we claim to exercise the prerogatives of a know- 
 ledge which belongs to a higher sphere. As citi- 
 zens and Christians we stand in varied relations 
 to a universe of which we can see but the least 
 part. This world is not all ; and if we look confi- 
 dently for a unity of the whole, we dare not at- 
 tempt to construct it in imagination upon the 
 little field which is open to us. 
 
 41. The forms which present divisions as- 
 sume are, it is admitted, and must remain causes 
 for the deepest sorrow. Nothing can be more 
 grievous than the partial wilfulness with which 
 Christian men and Christian societies exalt from 
 time to time with an idolatrous devotion special 
 fragments of truth, which tend to lose their essen- 
 tial character by being isolated. But such reflec- 
 tions as have been suggested, while they leave 
 the special evils of a divided Christendom just as 
 they are, yet enable the devout mind to regard 
 them without despair: nay more to regard them, 
 . as it would regard the disorders of the physical 
 world, with quiet confidence and faith. We can- 
 not yet see how the whirlwind or the earthquake 
 falls in with an infinitely benevolent system of 
 nature; but we do not doubt that it does do 
 
midst of antagonisms. 215 
 
 so. In looking on human life we have even chap hi. 
 better grounds for faith. There we can see faint 
 beginnings of a final harmony, converging tenden- 
 cies towards a divine order, which will embrace 
 all the varieties of thought and life in their 
 richest fulness. When we see what the belief in 
 Christ and the power of His Resurrection has 
 done, how it has interpreted and conquered this 
 and that instinctive feeling, how it has found an 
 embodiment, natural if not complete, under every 
 variety of external circumstances, how it includes 
 in itself a principle of unity capable of combining 
 whatever there is in these of permanent value, 
 we can look out upon the conflict of sects without 
 distrust, and look forward to that golden age to 
 which and not from which the history of the 
 Church advances. 
 
 42. Nothing is more paralysing than a sense , 
 
 of isolation : nothing is more cheering than a con- 
 sciousness of fellowship in the combined action of 
 a great nation or of a great society. Christendom 
 is weak not only because it is divided but chiefly 
 because each section is enfeebled by a sense of 
 the littleness of its power as it measures the tri- 
 umphs of Christianity by its own peculiar stand- 
 ard. Our strength will be indefinitely increased 
 if we believe that God works not only through us 
 
216 Conclusion. 
 
 chap. in. or in our way and according to our notions, but 
 uses us according to the measure of our capacities, 
 and others with us in the accomplishment of the 
 designs of His Love. Every energy will be turned 
 to its proper work as our thoughts rest on the 
 glory of the Risen Saviour. 
 
 43. Wherever we look the first question 
 which arises is ever: To what purpose is this 
 waste ? On all sides we see a prodigal wealth of 
 powers which to us appear to pass away without 
 effect, of germs of life which never fulfil what we 
 think to be their proper destiny, of beauty which 
 gladdens no human eye. In the moral world the 
 same mystery recurs. One man out of many; one 
 family of many, one nation of many, one world of 
 many (if our thoughts dare wander so far), are 
 centres of blessings of which all are equally capable 
 of sharing, and we cannot trace the law by which 
 their influence gradually reaches to the furthest 
 limits of being, while we see multitudes perish 
 unconscious of their common heritage. All na- 
 ture teaches the same lesson. We know in part. 
 It is enough. If Christ be risen, in that fact lies 
 Actsiii.21. the pledge of 'the restitution of all things' towards 
 which men are encouraged to work. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR. 
 I. 
 
 GENERAL SURVEY OF THE HISTORY 
 
 OP THE 
 
 CANON OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 
 
 DURING THE FIRST FOUR CENTURIES. 
 A new and revised Edition, crown 8vo. cloth, price ios. 6d. 
 
 ii. 
 
 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF 
 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 
 
 A new and revised Edition, crown 8vo. cloth, price icw. 6d. 
 
 in. 
 
 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GOSPEL 
 MIRACLES. 
 
 Sermons preached before the University of Cambridge, with 
 Notes. Crown 8vo. cloth, price 4*. 6d. 
 
 IV. 
 THE BIBLE IN THE CHURCH. 
 
 A popular account of the Collection and reception of the Holt 
 Scriptures in the Christian Churches, i8mo. cloth, price 
 4*. 6d. 
 
 (One of Macmillan's School Class- Books.) 
 
THEOLOGICAL WORKS. 
 
 DISCUSSIONS ON THE GOSPELS. 
 
 In Two Parts. Part I. On the Language employed by Our 
 Lord and His disciples. Part II. On the Original Lan- 
 guage of St Matthew's Gospel, the Origin and Authenticity 
 of the Gospels. By the Rev. Alexander Roberts, D.D. 
 Second Edition, revised and enlarged. 8vo. cloth, price 
 1 6s. 
 
 CHRISTIAN EVIDENCES AND THE 
 BIBLE. 
 
 Being Sermons preached in St Martin's Church, Leicester. 
 With a Preface and Notes. By the Rev. David James 
 Vaughan, M.A. Vicar of St Martin's, Leicester, and late 
 Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Fcap. 8vo. cloth, 
 price 5s. 6d. Second Edition, revised and enlarged. 
 
 A CLASS-BOOK OF OLD TESTAMENT 
 HISTORY. 
 
 By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, M.A. Assistant- Preacher at the 
 Temple Church, London. This Work forms a Class-Book 
 of Old Testament History for the lower as well as the 
 higher forms in Schools. In its preparation, the most re- 
 cent authorities have been consulted ; and wherever it has 
 appeared useful, notes have been subjoined, illustrative of 
 the history. For the sake of more advanced theological 
 students, references are added to larger works. A copious 
 Index h. s been so arranged as to form a concise Dictionary 
 of the persons and places mentioned in the narrative; 
 while the Maps have been prepared with considerable care. 
 Tables are appended, containing Lists of the Patriarchs and 
 their descendants ; the Kings and Prophets, Contempora- 
 neous History, Weights and Measures, &c. The Second 
 Edition, v*ith four Maps, i8mo. cloth, price 43. 6d. 
 
 Also, by the same Author. 
 
 A CLASS-BOOK OF NEW TESTAMENT 
 HISTORY. 
 
 Including the Connexion of the Old and New Testament. With 
 Map=». i8mo. cloth. Uniform with Macmiilan's School 
 Class-Books. 
 
ECCE HOMO. 
 
 A Survey of the Life and Work of Jesus Christ. 8vo. price ios. 6J. 
 
 THE HEAVENLY EATHEB. 
 
 By Ernest Naville, Corresponding Member of the Institute 
 of France, and formerly Professor of Philosophy in the 
 University of Geneva. Translated by Henry Downton, 
 M.A. English Chaplain at Geneva. Extra fcap. 8vo. price 
 78. 6d. 
 
 THE VOICE OF GOD IN THE PSALMS. 
 
 A Course of Sermons by Granville Forres, Rector of Brough- 
 ton, Author of "Village Sermons by a Northamptonshire 
 Rector." Crown 8vo. cloth, 6s. 6d. 
 
 NOTES OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE. 
 
 A Selection of Sermons. By Henry Rorert Reynolds, B. V. 
 President of Cheshunt College, and Fellow of University 
 College, London. Crown 8vo. cloth, price 7s. 6d. 
 
 SERMONS PRE A GHED IN MANCHESTER. 
 
 By Alexander Maclaren. New and cheaper Edition. Fcap. 
 8vo. 4*. 6d. 
 
 VILLAGE SERMONS. 
 
 By G. F. De Teissier, B.D. Rpctor of Brampton, near North- 
 ampton, late Fellow and Tutor of Corpus Christi College, 
 Oxford. Second Series, Crown 8vo. cloth, 8s. 6d. Also 
 First Series, Crown 8vo. 9*. 
 
 THE BIBLE WOBD-BOOK. 
 
 A Glossary of Old English Bible Words. By J. Eastwood, 
 M.A. of St John's College, and W. Aldis Wright, M.A. 
 Trinity College, Cambridge. i8mo. cloth. Uniform with 
 Macmillan's School Class-Books. 
 
ST PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE 
 QALATIANS. 
 
 A Revised Text, with Notes and Dissertations. By J. B. 
 Liohtfoot, D.D. Hulsean Professor of Divinity in the 
 University of Cambridge. 8vo. cloth, ios. 6d. 
 
 THE SYNONYMS OF THE NEW 
 TESTAMENT, 
 
 By Richard Chenevix Trench, D.D. Archbishop of Dublin. 
 New and Revised Edition, in one vol. 8vo. price ios. 6d. 
 
 A TREATISE ON THE PASTORAL 
 OFFICE. 
 
 Addressed chiefly to Candidates for Holy Orders, or to those 
 who have recently undertaken the cure of souls. By the 
 Rev. John W. Bcbgon, M.A. Vicar of St Mary-the-Vir- 
 gin's, Oxford, and Fellow of Oriel College. 8vo. 128. 
 
 A HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN 
 CHURCH 
 
 DURING THE MIDDLE AGES AND THE REFORMATION. 
 
 By Charles Hardwick, M.A. late Fellow of St Catharine's 
 College, Divinity Lecturer at King's College, and Christian 
 Advocate in the University "of Cambridge. Second Edi- 
 re vised by Francis Procter, M.A. late Fellow of St 
 Catharine's College, and Vicar of ^Yitton, Norfolk. Two 
 Vols. Crown 8vo. cloth, 218. Sold separately price 10s. 6d. 
 each. 
 
 By the same AutJtf>r 9 
 . CHRIST AND OTHER MASTERS 
 
 A Historical Inquiry into some of the Chief Parallelisms and 
 Contrasts between Christianity and the Religious Systems 
 of the Ancient World. Two vols. Crown 8vo. 155. 
 
 THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE. 
 
 By James Brtce, B.A. Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford. A New 
 Edition, revised. Crown 8vo. 
 
 MACMILLAN AND CO. LONDON. 
 
THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW 
 
 AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS 
 
 WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN 
 THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY 
 WILL INCREASE TO SO CENT9 ON THE FOURTH 
 DAY AND TO $1.00 ON THE SEVENTH DAY 
 
 fit 
 
 inn 
 
 ffip 
 
TTf 
 
 I IWIYKRSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY