B 3 110 ^75 GIFT OF c— -^ THE ';;;>!* MECHANICAL CAUSE iiPi OF Gravitation and the Tides BY H. D. HOUGHAM THE MECHANICAL CAUSE OF Gravitation and tlie Tides BY H. D. HOUGHAM OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA ARTISTIC LIFE PRESS 1899 COPYRIGHTED I have written no preface for this pamphlet. If it has merit it will write its own preface in the future ; if it has no merit, it will do the same thing for its epitaph. H. D. HOUGHAM. Oakland, Cal. Oct. I, 1899. 374415 THE MECHANICAL CAUSE OF GRAVITATION AND THE TIDES Dear Reader: — At the time I authorized the following in- terview in the Call, I had not decided to give the result of my experiments and study to the public; as you will see, there is no explanation of the mechanism of the system,- for, as I believed then, and still believe, there is an economic value in my discover}'. Failing health, however, has decided me to present it to the world, and though the explanation in this pamphlet may be so crude and rambling as not to be rightly understood, I have tried, as much as possible, to avoid the use of technical terminology, and to use plain, household words that all can understand, — I am not writing for a class, but for the general public. I claim I can maintain my theory, and am willing to go before any body of men with full faith in my ability to demonstrate the correctness of my theories. THE INTERVIEW [From the San Francisco Call, April 4, 1897] /||\R H. D. HOUGHAM of Oakland thinks that he has dis- covered the mechanical "why" for gravitation; the "why" whose existence Sir Isaac Newton conceded, and at the same time confessed that he could not find it. Mr. Hougham has been working over the problem for forty years, and he now believes that he has solved it, and that success has finally crowned his labors. The scientist was visited in his home across the bay by a Sunday Call reporter, to whom he talked most interestingly concerning his supposed discovery of a new principle in mechani- cal science. " After forty years of experimenting and study," said Mr. Hougham, "I claim to have discovered the mechanical and mathe- <.v -:. • • ^ 6 — matical principles in which electricity, heat and other forces of matter, both materialized and etherealized, operate to produce many of the phenomena that we see in nature, as we call it, but as I believe there is an economic value in my discovery, at present I can give you only some of the cardinal points leading up to it. " When Newton picked out the latin words ' centrum pelo ' and 'centrum fugo,' out of which he coined the two English words centripetal and centrifugal, and applied them as names to the two motions or forces which he claims to have discovered and explained that always exist in a body revolving on an axis, he assumed at once that our earth was endowed with the same condition of force and motion, and as he found that the centrifugal force was from the centre at a right angle from the radia of that centre, he found that force not to be in harmony with world-building, and then claimed to have discovered what he called the law of gravitation to counteract his other force — that is, a law that clothes matter with the power of acting at a distance, altliough he admitted that he believed that there was a mechanical 'why' for gravitation, liut he could not find it. and claimed the credit of discovering only the mathematical 'whw' The mechanical 'why' is what I claim to have discovered, and I do not claim it as a theory alone. " I would not give a fig for any man's theory or a cent for my own if I had one, if I did not have something tangible behind it. I claim in describing it I can materially demonstrate, mechanically illustrate and methematically prove it. If I should go into my mill to put in some additional machinery and I should find that some of the old pulleys were running the wrong way to suit the new pulleys, what would 1 do ? Reverse the engine ami shafting ? By no means. 1 would cross \.\\u ])clt and the new pulley would run the right way. Now, that is just what nature does. She crosses her belts. T>ut one may sa>- thai there is no such thing as a \isible tangible Ijelt in tlic nebular liypolhesis. I grant it : but what is the operation of a visible tangible belt? Nothing l)ul force operating upon the lines of least resistance within the form and substance of the belt, and that is what electricity and all other forces in nature do, — always act on tlie lines of least resistance within the hnni and svibstance of whatever they are acting in, and the forces in their operations in nature as we call it, cross these line.s ot least resist- ance, and the scientist has never been able to explain their mechan- ism. They point out the many crossed lines in astronomy and physical geography, and the crossing of the nerves as they pass from the spinal cord to the brain at the medulla oblongata, the motor optic, and nearly all the nerves of the human and animal body on which flow the nervous fluid, but the} have never been able to explain the mathematical and mechanical operation of these systems of vibratory energy, and like our earth, the cyclone, water- spout, the shot falling from the shot-tower, hail, rain, and many other systems of energy that seem a puzzle to them — that is what I claim to be able to explain 1 "The explanation carries with it no puzzle or seeming incon- sistencies, as there is in some of Newton's theories. Take one of his theories that space has three dimensions, then just consider a body of matter like our earth, 8,000 miles through, with all its mountain ranges and inequalities, with free access to this space revolving upon but one axis, what is there to keep it from deviating or turn- ing on some other axis, and if it should, what is there to stop it or bring it back? Within the last few years I have read a number of pamphlets from different authors, wherein they claim that there is the fourth dimension to space, and our failure to comprehend it is the cause of our ignorance of the mechanism of the universe. " Now. I deny that there is any such thing as dimension to space. What we call space is a condition between forms, and is not an entity, and has no existence in fact, and you cannot give dimensions to a non-existing nothing. What seems to designate to us the condition we call space is nothing but the principles that govern the possibilities and impossibilities of the vibratory energy of the absolute of the form, together with the joint product of that vibratory energy governed by all the possibilities and impossi- bilities of the motion of the form itself. " The reason why, as I claim, that there is stability apparent in our planet, is that the motion that we see is the elusive motion of form, that is, the combined product of the invisible mathemati- cal, mechanically organized S3'Stems of the vibratory energy of the absolute of matter, or the mathematically arranged units of form. " In a system that I can show is a spontaneity in nature wherein all the systems so arranged themselves as in the snowflake that the vibratory energy is constantly recurring back to itself, or back to first primary motion, so that, when the system is once created, like a waterspout over the ocean, for instance, every system of vi- bratory energy embodies within itself both cause and eff'ect, for the kinetic energy of each system is so utilized by crossing the lines of least resistance, that all the generative forces in the form are — 8 — turned in upon themselves, and create a pressure toward a common center. I can show that that system is in harmony with world- building without the invention of any law of gravitation or any other law separate from matter or force, for a law is nothing and does nothing. " Laws do not execute themselves. It takes force to create motion. "To show how easily Newton might have been deceived, I will illustrate. I will place you in a boat with a man rowing you due west. You know the boat is going west; you see the man rowing you west at the same time that a wind is blowing >ou due north. You know the boat is going north. You feel the wind blowing you north. Now, your judgnient and understanding, governed by your reasoning faculties, tell you that the boat cannot go north and west at the same time in separate paths; that the two systems of vibratory energy, created within the form and substance of the boat by the two forces, the man and the wind, impel the boat to form a resultant motion, and grant, lor this illvistration, that the force of the wind was etiual lo the force of the man, that resultant motion would be due northwest. " Now, suppose >-ou could not see the man nor feel tin.' wind, and the existence of those two separate and di.-tiiict causes were unknown to you, and could not be recognized by any of your senses or modes of observation, what would you say was the cause of the motion of the boat northwest, which you see? Would \"ou say, as Newton did ab nit that apple, that there was something in the northwest that attracted it? "You see in ihi^ illustration out of the man\- possible nu)tions of the form of the boat I have employed only two, and out of the possible number of systems of vitiratory energy that could be created williiii tlie form and sui)Stance of tlic boat by force. I liave employed only two. ''Now I want to sa\- about Ne-wton's apple, that the apjile before it fell Irom tlic tree was fulliHing all tla- possibilities of motion and \ibration and was only a i)art of a s\stem, the forces of which are .so mechanically and matlK'Uialie'ally arranged, that the system controls and utilizes all ot tiie e(.iUritugal and kiiietit- energies in such a way as to recur llieni bat-k to tlie sv^lLin and create a motion and ])ressure, and when the ap])le fell it was obev- ing a force and not a law, and that force was a pri-duit of \ ibration, and that vibration was within the su1)stance of the apple and not — 9 — outside of it. Nature never gets outside of itself. If it could. Newton might put his centrifugal force where nature could not handle it. "If 3'ou are a contractor and I give you a job to lay a stone sidewalk, about the first question you will ask is, in what shape do I want the block put down. I will tell you that there are but three shapes that will fit a superficial area without interstices between, and they are the equilateral triangle, the hexagon and square. You may make forms all your lif and make untold millions of them, but you never can make forms but the three, that will fit a superficial area without leaving interstices between, but all the millions that you could make equal onl>' the three, for the three embody all their lines. And so it is with the solid figures. There are but five solid figures that can have an equal mathematical and mechanical division with a common center, and they are called the platonic figures, after Plato, who discovered them. Now you may make untold millions of solid figures, but you can never make one that can have a mathematical division with a common center but the five, and all the millions that you can make will equal only the five, for they embody all their lines. " vSo, too, with the principles of vibration and life that run this universe. There are millions of conditions of vibration, as many as there are forms in it, or as many as all the forms you can create, but there is but one condition, or system of vibration, and life, wherein the vibration recurs back to first cause, or primary motion ; but all the millions of conditions of vibrations that you can create equal only the one, for the one embodies all the others. Nature never gets outside of itself. And this recurrence of the vital force of life back to the system of life, as I can show, is what causes the thud or pulse in thi- human and animal system or body, and that ever-present pnlse can be detected in every and all forms of organized life, even back to the protoplasm; and not only in organized life, but in organized force or energy, as in the galvanic battery, the waterspout, thunder cloud or storm, and even in the lines of force in the stationary magnet. The ever-present pulse can be detected, and so it is from the plajiet on which we live down to the smallest organization of life or force within its grasp. •'Some scientists tell us that evolution is a spontaneous change from a uniform structure, or a change from a homogeneous to a heterogeneous condition. Now what I claim is that the spon- taneitv is in the uniformitv and not in the change ; that the lO — change is caused by the environments. What makes it seem to us as a spontaneit}' is because the environments are ever present within the uniformity of the structure of the vibratory system that runs the planet on which we live and holds in its grasp all forms that can evolute and binds them within some kind of environment. " The most discouraging part of the work of a student is seeking the truth. After finding something that he thought real, he discovers that it was only an illusion, and that the real is still further away, and after he has followed his investigations for a lifetime and cleared away illusion after illusion from his bewildered senses, he falls hack upon his reasoning laculties and asks himself the question : Is there an absolute reality within and beyond the reach of human ken, and if there is, is all this side of it a world of illusion ? "To show you what I mean by illusion I will illustrate. I will place eight cannon balls on the arms of a four-foot wheel and give that wheel a certain revolution and it will look to you like a solid iron rim or balance wheel, but you know it is not, and why ? Because you have been undeceived. You have seen it start and stop, or .seen some other wheel start and stoj), l)ut if you had never been undeceived, you never would know l)ut what this was a solid iron wheel. All the knowledge that comes to you from the out- side world comes to you through some of your five senses. Now there are four of your senses that have nothing to do with the analysis of that problem ; you cannot smell it, you cannot taste it, 5'ou cannot hear it, you cannot feel it, and the onl\- sense that von have left, your sight, is completely deceived, and if >-ou had never been undeceived you ne\'er wonld know i)ut what it was a solid iron rim. "Now, if eight cannon balls, large objects that you can ordi- narily see with the naked eye at a very slow \-flocit\-, can so deceive the only sense you have that has anything to tlo willi tlic problem, and make you believe that a condition or form is an entity wlu-n it is not — m;d-:L' von believe tlial ;in illusion is a reality — liow much easier it is for the iiiikscMil):il»l\ small ;it(un< that cannot be seen with llie l)est mii-roscope, with an inconcei\able velocity, to deceive any and all \(iur senses, ami make nou think other tilings are real when the\- are not, but oid\- the condition of something that is real. What the somelhin.L; is we do not know. Call it atoms, call it s])irit, call it electricity, call it force, call it — II — mind, call it God ; but calling an unknowable thing a name gives us no additional knowledge of what it is. "I see that lamp-post there, and why do I see it? I see it because there is an intervening medium between me and the post, and the form of that post is vibrating through that medium on to the retina of my eye, thence across the optic ner\^e to my brain, making me cognizant of the fact that the post is there ; but if you could take away the intervening medium and create an absolute void between me and the post, I never would know that the post was there. How many intervening mediums exist between our senses and forms, we do not know. Between the hardest steel and the X ray there are many. How many beyond the X ray no man can answer. " What I claim is that there is the last intervening medium, the absolute of form or what we call matter ; the absolute reality of this univer.se can act as an intervening medium between all the forms it creates and the human mind, but there is nothing to act as an interv^ening medium between itself and the human mind. Any gross substance cannot act, and a more etherealized or spiritual substance there is none. I claim that no human being will ever know what the absolute reality is ; that there always will be an empty void between tlieni, but what it does and how it does it is a problem that can be soh-ed by the human mind. " You ask me what it is ? I answer it has no is. What is it like? It has no like. But when you ask mc what it does, I say it does nothing only through form and in form. That is what I claim to be able to explain ; that when it acts in form and through form it acts mechanically and mathematically, and in no other way.' ' The preceding interview sets forth some of the phenomena that I claim to be able to explain, but as I cannot treat of them all in a short pamphlet like this, I will take up but two of them here — Gravitation and the Tides — and lea\-e the others for a future effort. Now, on the question of Gravitation, I will .say that all motion of form, that we can see or recognize by any of our senses or ph_vs- ical modes of observation other than deductions of the intellect through the process of our reasoning faculties, is produced by the joint forces of some condition of vibration of the absolute or ulti- mate substance composing the form in question. To make it more — 12 — clear, let me illustrate. 1 will take ten oranges in my two hands and put them together so that they will touch each other, and ask you what I have. You will say that I have a bunch of oranges or a cluster of oranges, but I will tell you that a cluster or a bunch of oranges is not an entity and has no real existence ; that it is only a condition of the oranges ; take away the oranges and where is your bunch or cluster ? Then I will move the cluster north and ask you what I moved north, and you will say, "The cluster." I will say, "No, it was the oranges." There was nothing else to move, and the motion of the oranges is not real, only an illusion of our senses ; the only real thing that moved would be the absolute or ultimate substance of the form of the oranges. Apply the same principle to the motion of all forms. Although the ab.solute or ultimate substance of all forms may not be recognized as possessing form or tangibility, as the oranges do, yet we must admit that this universe is not entirely an illusion save to the senses ; our intellect will decide that there is a reality in it, even if it is hidden from our senses within the form. And if the real exists, it must be the foundation on which the mechanism and mathematics of this uni- verse is based, and not on the unreal and illusive form. I claim thai the reason that the scientists have made no better progress in explaining the mechanism of the universe is that they have used the wrong kind of mathematics. Becau.se there is no limit to the divisibility of form that is recognized by our senses, they tell us there is no limit to figuring on the conic sections and the squaring of the circle; that there is no limit to the use of the decimal or vulgar fraction and that the circle cannot be squared. Now, I claim that there is a limit to the divisibility of form, and that limit lies between the form and the real that creates and maintains it, so when you get into the realm of form to ligmntc, tla-rt.- is no limit to the use of fractions until that dividing line is reached ; hut .when you go into tlie realm of the reality to figurate, you must leave your fractions behind, for you are figuring on something that was never created, never can be divided, changed or destroyed: and here is where the mechani.sm and the mathematics of this uni- verse rest, and this I hope to be able to show by self-evident facts that 1 shall ])resent. I believe I shall demonstrate that the nvolu- tions and motions that we see are not causes, but the effect ot' the invisible systems of x-ilnalion behind or within lluni, sxstcnis of \-ibration that ])rodnce the onl\' motion that wc can see, the motion of the form. Now, when I sjieak of forms, 1 mean to include all forms, ])(>th material and ethereal, to include electriiMt\- and nt'buhe. as well as iron and stone, for all forms are governed by the same principal of limit to the possibility and impossibilty of the number and condition of their motions, both primary and kinetic. I will now try to set out some of the cardinal principles of my theorum. From any given point in space, form can move in opposite direc- tions, but it is impossible for it to move in opposite directions sim- ultaneously, though it can move in diff rent directions at the same time. The question arises, how many ? The answer is, three, and no more; one motion for each dimension of form — length, breadth and thickness, or what some scientists call the three dimensions of space. When form is moving in two separate and distinct direc- tions at the same time, there is but one resultant motion ; Init when form is moving in three separate directions at the same time, it has three separate and distinct resultant vibratory forces. This principle of limit to the possibility and impossibility of the vibra- tory forces of the absolute of the form in the form makes the unreal and elusive form appear to our senses to act; what some scientist or professor terms, Governed by Law, the Law of Motion, The Law of Mechanics, but they have never told us how a law acts to grant, prohibit, or create motion to a form, and they never will as long as they look to the unreal form instead of to its real units for their knowledge. Now, these three vibratory forces above referred to merge into a common product of visible motion. As the square of the distance from the lines of its primary motions, and the only motion that is visible about this, is the motion of the form, the mechanism within the form that is not seen is the vibra- tion of the absolute or ulimate substance of the form, and when all the conditions of vibrations are created that can be created, there exists a uniformity of action and a mechanism of structure in the lines of force within the form. Now, if form cannot move in opposite directions at the same time, it cannot revolve in opposite directions at the same time, but it can revolve in different directions at the same time, and the question arises, how many ? The answer is, three, and no more. Three first or primary revolutions, one revolution for each dimension of form, or each possible three planes of vibration in the form. All the powers in the universe cannot make a body or form revolve in more than three directions at the same time on three primary axes. Not that form is real, but that the real within, that created and maintains it, cannot vibrate in more than three planes at the same time within the form, for to exceed that limit would be granting to substance the power to annihilate itself, or move in opposite directions at the same time, — 14 — with the attributes of Omnipresence. When matter or form has free access to space, like a rain-drop, or a shot falling from a shot- tower, it first commences to revolve, simultaneously or alternately, on three axes that produce three resultant revolutions that merge toward a common revolution, as the square of the distance from their primary lines of force. Let me describe the mechanism in detail. Take a form of electricity or nebula, or a form of any other matter, either visible or invisible, tangible or intangible. They are all governed by the same principle of action when free to act. Take for this illustration a form of nebula regardless of its shape, for out of the millions of shapes into which it can form, it is impossible for it to have more than three dimensions, length, breadth and thickness, or three planes of vibratory action. Now let this form of nebula commence to revolve on three axes, either simultaneously or in rotation. You .see the three axes would all be at right angles to each other, and following the lines of least resistance of each others revolution, they will maintain tliat right angle position if the form has free access to space and as there is no infinitx- in stability until all the possibilities of motion ha\e been created in the form, for as there is no stabilit\- in a torm revolving in free space on one primary axis, the revolution on the other two possible axes becomes a spontaneity ; for as there is no stability, deviation on ihe other axis is snre to follow . and devia- tion is revolution and the limit is three. Von see the instant the three revolutions are created there will l)e three resnltant revolu- tions, and each of these resultants will form a resultant with one of the three primary revolutions that created them, and merge into one common product or revolution, and the three resultant re\-olu tions will form a resultant with each other :uul nierL;e that \-ihra- torv force to the .same common centre or rexolnlion ;in the >qn;ue of the distance from their primar\' lines of re\olution. Now, this product of the primary system i-; the only motion that can be detected by any of our senses, and is a visiltle revolution of the form on one visible axis, and as 1 show in the inter\-ie\\ , in the illustration of the boat and the man, when three priniar\ revolu- tions are not \isil)le or not recognizable 1)\ our senses, the cause of the product becomes a puzzle lo thosi.' who have not L;one deeper into the mechanisiu of nature. Now, the produi-t of the priinar\- system, this resultant revolution on an axis, pnnlnces within the ultimate sul)stance of that toini what Xewton eiilled tin.' i-eiitiifu gal force of a revolvinj.; bodw and as the three |>riinnr\ revolutions transferred their centrifugal force to tlu' x'isihle revolulioii, :ind the — 15 — forces between the primar}' and resultant was an action of the units and not the form, the primary' revolutions display no centrifugal force save in the product. A body revolving on one axis will manifest centrifugal force, but the instant the body commences to revolve on a second axis, the centrifugal force is transferred to the resultant revolution. Now, I will try to show how the other invisible system of kinetic energy operates to utilize and control the centrifugal forces of the resultant revolution and throw them back into the three primary revolutions completing the endless chain of vibratory cause and effect within the form and complete a uniformity in the mechanism of that vibratory system. Let me say here that the words " inertia ", "momentum", "centrifugal force" and "kinetic energy" all relate to motions, but I have selected "kinetic energy" as the term to express what I mean when dealing with forms that are already in motion. To better understand it let me illustrate. I will place a grind-stone hung in bearings on a platform car going north on a true, level, straight track at the rate of sixty miles an hour. If the stone is not revolving in its bearings there is no kinetic energy, but momen- tum and inertia the same as the substance of the car ; but revolve the stone in its bearings and the resultant motion or energy pro- duced by the joint product of the motion of the car and revolution of the stone is what I call kinetic energy. The reader will note that, if the stone revolves on the car with its axis vertical, that there will be two conditions of kinetic energy in the stone, one in each half of the stone. If the side of the stone facing north is revolving east, the east half of the stone's motion will be in conflict with the motion of the car and the west half will be in union with the motion of the car, and form a stronger kinetic energy than the east half. You see the difference of the kinetic energy is divided by halves in the stone, but switch the car off onto a curve or circle from the straight track, say of a mile radius, the instant the kinetic energy changes from a dual condition to a quadral condition in the stone, there will be two quarters of the stone where the forces of the car and stone conflict, and two quar- ters where the}' conspire, and that condition of motion or force is constantly changing and swinging around in the stone and always faces the center of the car's orbit or revolution, and the stone revolves around in that changeable condition of motion and kinetic energy combined, the same as the earth does in her plane around the common center with the moon; and here you have the mechan- ism of the tides. In one plane or dimension of form, as described — TB — — in another part of this pamphlet, the four quarters represented by the tvventj^-four hours, six for each quarter, a low tide facing the moon in one quarter and a high tide and the same on the opposite side of the earth; and this kinetic motion is limited by the same limit of the three dimensions of form that govern primary motion; and as I deny there is any such thing as dimensions to space, either three or four, and as it is a self-evident fact that there are but three dimensions to form, yet I hope to be able to show how form, although it cannot move or revolve in more than three directions in its primary motions at the same time, not only can but does go into the fourth condition by a union of all the possible motions of the two systems of primary and kinetic motion. In fact, it is a spontaneity in the nature of matter or substance, whenever form has free access to space, as in the case of the rain-drop, the fourth con- dition of motion is the final limit of motion; that a sphere is the final limit of form, the mechanism that that fourth condition of motion creates, when form has free access to space witli a pressure toward a common center called gravity. The reader will note in the interview what is said about the three forms that will fit a superficial area, and the five solid figures. Now, the limit of form, the sphere, is not created by a single act of vibration, motion or revolution, but by a succession of different systems of vibration and revolution that work in mechanical harmony, that follow all the lines of the regular bodies from the lowest to the highest, tin.- lines of least resistance defined by the triad condition of motion. Nature's limit of primary revolution marks out the lines of the tetrahedron and the equilateral triangle, and the whole system when in action does not change its parallelism. The six poles of that triad condition of revolution define the lines of the hexahe- dron and the sciuare, and the six resultant i evolutions of the pri- mary and kinetic systems, with their twcl\L- j)oks, define the dodecahedron and hexagon. The eight poles of the fourth con- dition of revolution represent the octahedron and triangle, and tlie eight poles last named, and their unison with the resultant poles of the dodecahedron, represent the icosahedron, the form of twent\- faces. Thus you have all the regular bodies. 'I'he platonic figures well-defined in nature's mechanism, like the motion that creates them, are limited in nunil)er, and on these limits rest the mechan- ism and stability of the uiii\erse, systems of \il)rator\- rex'olution that are constantly changing their lines of force wilhiii tiie form, by uniting, with the lines of foree, the kinetic s\stems of xihralion and re\-()lntion, tinis aetins; in a dual mechanism in each jilane of — .1^ — ^ action or dimension of the form, cbntinually renewing and chang- ing the lines of force from the tetrahedron, by graduation through all the lines of the regular bodies to the icosahedron, a twenty- sided regular body, one of the platoinic figures, and from that to the sphere, the final limit of the form, as the carpenter's auger is the final limit of the primary motion of any or all of his tools. If it were not so. some genius would make a tool beyond an auger, but it never will be done unless tools can be endowed with the attributes of Omnipresence. For the auger when in use is fulfill- ing all the possibilities of primary motion, centripital, centrifugal and forward, and no tool can do more, for in order to do more it would have to move in opposite directions at the same time in one of its planes of dimension, length, breadtli or thickness ; but if the auger was composed of a pliable or plastic substance, and had free access to space like a rain-drop, or a waterspout, so that the spon- taneous systems of kinetic motion, with their cross-lines of least resistance could unite with the primary motion referred to when the auger was in use, matter or form would then go into the fourth condition of motion, the final limit of motion, and form a sphere, the final limit of form. If it were not so, some ingenious carpenter would build a form beyond the sphere, but it never has been done. It is easy for the mechanic to follow the lines and forms the other way until he arrives at the tetrahedron, where mathematics seem to be of little use to him in his search for regular bodies below it in uniformity. Would it be unreasonable to sug- sre-st that the mathematical lines of vibration, defined in the tetra- hedron, have any relation to the triad principle of primary motion that pervades this whole universe? In order to have the reader understand this S3'stem of kinetic energy and the fourth condition of motion, I will emplo\' a well-known form, one of the platonic figures, to illustrate. Take the hexahedron, or cube ; commence to revolve it simultaneously on three axes, the six poles to repre- .sent the center ot the six faces of the cube : the three axes will all stand at right angles to each other, and as there is no conflict with each other's lines of least resistance in that right angle position, they will maintain that relation to each other if free to act. The instant the three revolutions commence to act within the form, they produce three resultants, and as soon as the three resultants commence to act within the form, they form a resultant revolution with the three primary revolutions, all thus merging to one com- mon center of revolution. The axes of the three resultant revolu- tions would be at an angle of forty-five degrees from the primary — I8 — - - axes and represent three of the six equilateral diagonals of the cube. Now, this resultant revolution, the product of the primary systems, has received from the three primarN- revolutions all of their energy, and as there is no centrifugal force shown in the form in either of the three planes of primary revolution, the centrifugal force shown in the product was derived from the substance of the form in the primary planes of motion; and as the three lines of least resistance of the three primary systems are crossed, the cen- trifugal forces of the resultant system are acting on opposite sides of the primary axis, and support three kinetic revolutions, the axes of which will be the other three equilateral diagonals of the cube. This action is a generativ^e force and is constantly being renewed, for it is derived from the centrifugal force which is a spontaneit>" in nature; for as the axes of a revolving body are the lines of least resistance of that body, and the lines of least resistance in this case are crossed, the centrifugal force of the resultant revolution is acting on six opposite sides of the six poles of the three axes of the primary revolutions and becomes a generative force. You will see that the resultant axes of the three primary revolutions, the poles of which stand for two of the corners, of the cube, represent the diagonal between those two corners and cross the lines of least resistance of the three primary revolutions. The kinetic revolu- tions, created by the centrifugal force of the resultant revolution, form three resultant revolutions with the three primary revolutions, the poles of which represent the other six corners of the cube, between which the three axes run witli their six poles. Tims you have the fourth condition of motion, or revolution. The four axes represent the eight corners of the cube, with their eight poles. Now, I claim that this system of vibratory mechanism is all between the ultimate parts and not of the form only in the final product of revolutions, or the final resultant, the only action that can be recognized by our senses; that the vibratory systems are within and behind the motions of the form, the same as a bod>- revolving in one axis; as Newton described it, it is moving in two directions continually, centripital and centrifugal, l)ut the only motion we see or can recognize by any of our senses is the motion in the curve or circle. If Newton had looked to the ultimate sub- stance of the form, instead of to the illusive form for a solution of the problem, it would have saveil him the trouble of inventing his \/dw of (ira\-itation ; he would ha\e seen titat the motion of the form was an illusion and it was the ultinuite sul)slani'e that w.is moving in the twlane. ami if eit lu'r ot the t-auses ceases to act , there would be no tide>. Xow , the earth does not cease to re\'ol\e, but tiure is no motion at the poles in each plane of jirimary revolution, conseciuently there is no tide there for those planes, but a full tide there tor tlic other ]>l:ine of rex'olution that ac-ts at riijht anijles with it. 21 The tide of the great circle with the sun merges with the other two tides and the earth's relative position is constantly changing as to the center of that orbit, but as it swings around only once in 25,000 years, the human race has >ct no record of that tide ; but it has made many thousand swings around that center since this planet w^as nebulous. When the scientific world understands this theory, the emergence of this continent and the submergence of the Atlantas, the glacial period, the receding of the ocean at Norway and Spitzbergen, and the advancing of the ocean at other places, the alternate stratas of Arctic and tropical fossil animals and plants in Florida and Alaska, these are all made plain to the mechanical mind, for it is seen that the earth is changing the relative position of its poles as to the sun in that plane of its orbit, as well as in the other orbits around the sun and moon, all of which I can materi- ally demonstrate, mechanically illustrate and mathematically prove. If the earth was 25,000 years travelling once around its orbit in the plane with the moon, instead of 28 days, the changes in the tides that we now have every 14 days, at the new and full of the moon, would only occur once every 1 2,500 years, at the new and full of the moon. This s\stem will account for the tide on the opposite side of the earth from the moon, that never has been explained mechanicall3% even grant the Newtonian theory- of Gravitation to be true. But in this system there is one quarter of the circle of the earth in the plane with the moon that conflicts with the orbicular motion that is opposite from the moon, and one quarter that is facing the moon, so the change of the horizontal of the water occurs in those quarters every six hours in tliat plane of dimension or motion. The three tides are all acting at right angles to each other tide, each tide runs to nothing at its own axis, and is the deepest at the axis of Its neighboring tide. I claim to he able mechanically to illustrate all the conditions of motion, the final product of which produce the tangible visible tides that we recognize by our senses and physical modes of observation. When we go into the realm of form to figurate on the question of motion, it is limited to three planes or dimensions in its primary motion, and it can change its direction in three planes at the same time; but when we go into the realm of the reality to figurate, the question arises, is the absolute or ultimate substance of that form governed by the same limit in its motion ? Is it limited more or less? Let me suggest that all motion of form, inertia, centrifugal force and momentum, of or in a form, is the product of the vibra- tions of the absolute or ultimate substance of that form. A form 22 can change its direction of motion by the vibration of its parts mechanically; but it it is an absolute solid, and not composed of parts, it would be as impossible to change a direction of a moving body as it would be to move it in opposite directions at the same time, and to do either one or the other it would have to possess the attributes of Omnipresence and be in two places at the same time. For it will appear as a self-evident fact to the student of science, when he has given this question the required study, that if an absolutely solid body, not composed of parts and not able to vibrate within its form, were moving north, it would be impossible for it to move east without first stopping its motion north ; but in this realm of form, where the motion or" form has deceived our senses so long in that regard that the scientists have made no dis- tinction in regard to motion of the form and the absolute that creates and maintains it, the question of Omnipresence is as well defined or applied between north and east, as it is between nt)rth and south, or any other directions of dual or triad motions for an absolute solid. What I claim is that the atoms, the absolute of form, never change their directions of motion; that when an atom moves or is moved, it never changes the direction of that motion; that there is no power in the universe tiiat can make it change its direction of motion; that when it is once in motion it keeps moving in that direction until it meets another atom and then it stops and starts in another direction. Now, this collision of atoms stopping and starting, is vibration pure and simple, \ibra- tion within the form. It makes no dilTerence whether the form is a uniformity or a promisquity, it is vibration all the same; the only difference is the vibration is in the cell or crystal or any other uniform structure, the joint product of all ihc vibration in the form operates mechanically in a system in tlie i'orm. I would have the reader note here that there is a diff"erence between vibra- tion in the form and an alternate rapid motion itf the form. Xow. some scientists tell us that the action of the reed in the llute or organ and the tuning-fork is vibration ; I claim that the\- are onl\- alternate rapid motion of the visible form; that the vibrations are invisible actions of the absolute of the form that produced tlie motion of the form that we see, all of which was produced 1>\ tlie force of concussion or contact with some other form, either elheri- alized or tangible, and the\ in turn received their force fioin \ ibra- tion, and so on ad inlinituin. .\11 the motion oi' a planet that organizes is a vibratory system of mechanism in the fourth condi- tion of motion and wonld create but one common center of graxitv. — 23 — so called, if it had no orbicular motion ; but the orbicular motion, b}' forming a resultant motion with the axillary motion, changes the center of gravity, so called, in two quarters of the planet in each of the three planes of its orl^icular motion. Thus we have in the system, six quarters in the three planes that have a common center, and six quarters that do not have a common center of gravity. The question may be asked, why does a planet move in its orbit, and where does it get its motive power ? The lines of vibratory force that would seek a common center, if the planet had no orbicular motion, are diverted from their course by the orljicular motion in two quarters of the circle in each plane of revolution in the three orbits, and seek a center pressure or gravity, so called, a little ahead of what it would be if the planet was at rest in its orbit, and impels the planet forward in its three orbits or three planes of revolution. The question may be asked, what is the center of gravity ? The center of revolution is an imaginary line drawn through the center of a revolving body from pole to pole. The center of gravit}' is an imaginary point where three such lines cross each other at right angles in their center ; the point where all the mechanical lines of a planet, operating in the fourth condition of motion. cro.ss the point where duration exists but where there is no measure ment of time ; the point from which all the motions of that planet are measured. The question may be asked, what is time? Time is the measurement of events and has the same relation to form that motion has to matter. Without something to move, there can be no motion ; without something to create the event, there can be no time. Even the event of the existence of our own body produces the illusion we call duration ; but when we go into the realm of the reality, where there are no forms to measure events, fthe Bible says. "Unto God, the Alxsolute. one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as one day " ) the absolute is not deceived by the illusions of forms, as our senses are here in this realm of form. What is a da>-, a month, a year ? A day is the event of the earth revolving on its axis once in 24 hours. Place on the equator 24 houses an equal distance apart : you will have just one hour between each house. Then move them ten degrees farther north ; the houses are much closer together, but it is an hour between them ju.st the same. Then move them to the north pole, so the houses touch each other. Then cut a door from each house into the adjoining one, and by walking one way a man can walk a thousand \'ears into the past ; and by walking the other way, he can walk a thousand years into the future ; and by keeping step over the twelve o'clock mark he will be in the Everlasting Now, and there will be to him no past or future ; there will be no event to measure time for him ; the only thing he can recognize is the event of his own being. His own existence makes him recognize the condition we call duration, and if his l^ody did not exist there would be no duration for him. No more than you can have momentum with- out matter, so time cannot exist without form, and cannot be measured without a motion of that form. Some scientists may say that these things are governed by law ; that the fundamental principles connecting force and motion in the physical universe are obviousl\" to be derived from experiments alone, since intuitive reasoning cannot possibly give usan\- inform- ation as to what may be, or what may not be a law of nature. But if we take the ground that there is no such thing as law, separate and distinct from matter or form, that the absolute of form is the law, or a law unto itself; that it can act only in and through form ; that form is an illusion and not real ; that all experiments deal with form and cannot be performed without motion and vibration of and in that form and without a knowledge of the final limit of thai motion and vibration, the experiment will be elusive and deceptive to our senses and can only be removed by the application of (Uir intuitive reasoning faculties. Laws are not entities, or real, and cannot act. Laws do not execute themselves, are nothing and do nothing. All motion of form is the product of vibration and law cannot pre duce it. \"ibration is pioduced by force and not bv law, and motion is the product of its action. The absolute is the only thing that acts and it makes the form appear to our senses to do what the absolute cannot do — change its direction of motion — and it does it 1)\- the vibration of tlie units in the form. The material laws, .-o called, expressed by mathematics, are few and simple, but the b(cl\' of the science consists ot a vast scheme of numerical computations whose value seems to ai'|)ear in its application to astronomv and the other j)]iysical sciences, bnt as long as it vloes apjK-ar and is u^ed bv scientists, they will never arrive at the final truth ol the mechanism ol the universe; bnt when tlu\' are satisfiestini ot niechaiiisni and uni- formity, there is a perfei-t inlinit\- in llu' stabilitN of tin w liole svs- ti-m ; ii it was not so, chaos, instead ofoidei. would hIl^u supreme. I am an engineer by trade and know something al>ont a steam boiler, and I will say that the only difference between the action of vibration in the steam boiler and in the dynamo in the power- house is that the vibratory energy in the boiler is vil)ration in pro- miscuity, has a pressure in all directions, is held in place by the shell of the boiler and is taken out in a pipe and used in the cylin- der. The vibration in the dynamo is vibration in unilbnnity, and organizes in a mechanical s>steni tliac confines itself and has a pressure toward a common center — a wire is run in and takes it out and uses it, for instance, in the motor under a car, that has less pressure than the dynamo. Here let me say that ever\- rain-drop organizes that way and has a pressure toward a common center and not only organizes water, but heat and other etherealized sub- stances in a sphere around it, as our earth does the atmosphere. And this solves the query of why a thunder-shower cools the air. The air being a poor conductor of heat, it cannot descend alone, so each rain-drop takes some down to the earth, which is a good conductor of heat. There is no such condition as a constant pull from the center of a revolving body, caused by what Newton called the centrifugal force ; the pull is caused by vibration and is a generative force ; as the form is moving in two directions at the same time, as Newton showed, the resultant is what he called the centrifugal force. Now, that force being generative and from two causes, dual in its action and continually renewing that dual condition, the product must be an alternate condition of motion and rest ; but our senses are not acute enough to detect the rest, for it is not an action of the form but the vibration of the ultimate substance of the form, and the illusive pull is the action of the absolute in form, or ot form ; and as I show in the illustration of the sheep, the units ot the form are not doing what the form appears to our senses to be doing, and neither our sen.se of sight nor our sense of feeling is acute enough to detect the rest in the vibrations, which are al\\a>s dual in their action. In any one plane any three points in spacf are always in one plane. The pull from the center of a revolving- body seems like a constant pull from the center ; we cannot detect the rest, but a second revolution will do it, and in the primary revolutions there is nocentifugal force of the form — that force is in the form and not of it, and is transferred to the product or result- ant fr(mi the two j)rimary re\-olutions. Now, if two primary revolutions are able to convert or divert their centrifugal force to a resultant revolution as they do, and three primary revolutions — 28 — divert their centrifugal forces to a common product of revolution as they do, why will not the common product or resultant revolu- tion, by crossing its lines of least resistance, be able to convert its centrifugal forces through the khietic energy back into the first primary revolution, and create a never-ending chain of vibratory action in a system of uniiorm mechanical action ? Now, in the common transactions of every day life, we think it nothing strange or unreasonable to see two or more separate and distinct physical causes operating to bring about one effect, as when we travel on a steamboat propelled by two engines, a coach drawn by six horses, or a boat rowed by ten men ; but it seems never to have occurred to any one to look for more than one cause for gravitation and the tides. Now, what I claim is that all effects are the product of motions and vibration, and without motion and vibration there can be no effect ; that the vibration in the form is a separate and distinct cause in each of its separate planes of dimension, and, when free to act, works in harmony to bring about one effect, and the effect is the only action we can recognize by our senses. Let me illustrate this centrifugal force. Seat your self in a chair at the center of a revolving table, say forty feet in diameter; seat another man in a chair at the circumference or outer edge facing you ; connect your hand with his by a string ; then revolve the table at the rate of one hundred revolutions a minute. The man in tlie outer chair will pull on the string one-half of the way around during the first revolution, and slacken the string the other half; the second revolution he will j)ull and slacken twice, the third revolution he will pull and slacken four times ; the fourth, eight times; the fifth, sixteen times ; the sixth, thirty-two times, and so on, sixty-four, one hundred and twenlx' eight, etc. How far would he have to dcjuble the pull and slack before it would deceive the sense of feeling of the man at the center, and make him think that it was a constant pnll '^ lUit it ne\er \\t)uKi lie. if you ran it up into the hundreds of millions. .As Tesla tells abt)ut that other condition of vibration, so this centrifugal force is not a constant pull l)Ut a generative force, and constantly being renewed. But no revolution was ever created bv man so rapid that the second rex'olution, on another axis of the same form, would not form a resultant with the first centrifugal force and transfer the two centrifugal forces to the resultant rexoliition. Let me give another illustration. 1 will >tand \(in in a \alley five miles away, facing a side hill witli a nnitonu >;rade, at an angle — 29 ^ of forty-five degrees. I will mark the hill off in ten foot squares, with the diagonal of the squares facing you. I will then place two sheep on each corner of the squares, facing down the lines of the squares, and have them all commence to walk down the lines of the squares. I will ask you what you see on the hill. You will say that you see a band or herd of sheep that are so far away that you cannot see an individual sheep, but you see the band or herd that they create. I will tell you that a band or herd of sheep is not an entity, that it has no existence as a reality, that it is only a con- dition of the sheep ; take away the sheep and where is your band or herd ? I ask you what are they doing ? You will say the band is coming straight down the hill, which would be on the lines of the diagonals of the .squares. I hand you a spy-glass and you look through it at the band, and you say, " Oh ! yes, I was mistaken ; they are not coming straight toward me, it was an illusion of the sight ; each sheep is coming at an angle of forty-five degrees to the diagonal of the squares. I can see the units that create the illu- sion, and not the form." Apply this to the absolute of all form and you will see that the illusion can never be removed by our senses, for the abso- lute can never be seen. Anything real can have but one name, all other names are names of conditions ; but in order to place these names properly we must know on which side of the line we stand, that line that lies between the realm of form and the realm oi" the real ; and that line will be defined, not alone by studying what matter is, but what it does ; for all the knowledge that can be grasped by the human mind is the product of action, as well as being, since all forms are created and maintained by action. Some years since I visited the University of California, and enjoyed an interview with Prof John Le Conte. While showing me his experimental appliances he had occasion to display the gyroscope, and referred to it as the mechanical paradox. I said to him. " Professor, why do you call the gyroscope a mechanical par- adox? Is not the top as much a paradox as the gyroscope ? " He said, " Yes, fully as much, so I do not know why we have not called it such." I then put the question, " What is your theory of the action of the top ? The top is a cone sitting on its apex. Place a piece of wood in a lathe fashioned as true as human skill can build ; turn it down as accurately as human art can accomplish ; set it on its apex and level it with a spirit level, leave it to itself, and at the least oscillation it will fall, and the oscillation is bound to come. — 30 — No human being ever made a cone set on its apex ; but if you give it a spinning motion it will not fall ? Now, Professor, what is your theory of the reason that it does not fall, Avhen running as when standing ? ' ' "Yes," he said, "that is the question — you have stated it correctly. We have but one theory and I am not prepared to say that it is correct ; but it is the only one we have, and we will have to keep it until we have another." Then I said. " Professor, what is the theory ?" He replied, " It is impossible to create z. perfect point; grind a needle down with the greatest of skill and then look at it through the microscope, and you will see a blunt point. The top not hav- ing a perfect point, works to an upright position on this imperfect point as it revolves." " Professor." said I, "That theorx- will not work, there is nothing in it." He laughingl\- said that he was not prepared to say that there was, but it was the only theory extant. I continued: "Now, Professor, I ha\-e a theory why the top does not fall when running as it does when standing." "What is it?" he inquired. " I told him to let me have a piece of paper and allow me to demonstrate. 1 then marked out two tops, one standing vertical and the other at an angle of about thirty degrees, and showed that it was impossible for matter or form to move in more than three directions at the same time in its primary motions; that the top. when revoh'ing. is fullfilling that limit in all its parts ; that when the top is N-ertical these three motions are all at right angles to each other and have three resultant motions. Consider the two motions as defined b\' Newton in a revolving body, the centripetal and centrifugal, and a downward motion toward the center of the earth, the centripetal motion of the earth —but that motion we do not notice for we nio\e with it. Now, the two resultant motions on opposite sides of the to]), the product of the downward motion and the centripetal motion, press toward the axis ot the toj) and form e(|uilateral lines of ])ressure ; but, as the downward motion never changes, if the to]) leans over a little the centrii)etal motion on one side oi tlie top forms an obtuse angle and on thr other an acute angle with the downward moti()n, thus tlirowing the lop up to a vertical position, if the re\-olution is strong enough. The Professoi reflected a inonnail and said, " 1 ,ini not pre- pared to sa\' that nou arc wrong ; I will look into it." — . 31 — Illusions that are created and maintained b\' the motion of form are sometimes removed i)y the proper exercise of our senses, but the illusions that are created by the vibration of the absolute of the form, can only be removed by our reasoning faculties in con- nection with a knowledge of all the possible conditions of vibration within the form itself. Speaking of the fourth condition of motion, I will sa\- to those men who are talking so much about the bringing of rain by firing of cannon and exploding gases in the air, that there is a right way and a wrong way to explode and fire your cannon. You can shoot in uniformity or promiscuity, as explained in another place. When matter organizes in the fourth condition of motion, a sphere is the final limit of form and it has a pressure toward a common center ; that sphere is held in that form by the fourth condition of motion, as is our earth, a cyclone or a waterspout. Now, in order to create that condition by the firing of cannon, it must be done mechanically. Take the hexahedron or cube, place it mechani- cally with the four cardinal points of the compass, take forty-eight cannon more or less — as long as the number is uniform in division with the six sides of the cube — place eight on the north side shoot- ing west, eight on the south side shooting east, eight on the west side shooting up, eight on the east side shooting down, eight on the top shooting south, eight on the bottom shooting north. Then if these cannon are shot, one on each of the six sides simul- taneously, in rapid succession until they are all discharged, you will create the three primary revolutions, as descrii)ed in another place in this book ; and the other kinetic system is a spontaneity and creates itself without cannon and merges with the primary system, and you have the fourth condition of motion of torm, a sphere of air, and like a cyclone or a waterspout w itli a pressure toward a common center; and it will condense the moisture and produce rain as the cyclone and cloudburst do. On this coast it would gather the moisture and condense the vapor, that is con- stantly being drifted into the interior by the sea breeze, and hold it until it bursts, then you have the rain ; but let me say that this should be done as high in the air as possible, for if done on the ground in a narrow vallev it would not be a success. It should be performed on the top of a hill, so as to give it room to organize, and to act after organizing, and to travel in its three orbits. Speaking again of the fourth condition of motion, let me say to the men who are experimenting with the flying machine, that if they will imitate the bird they will have better success. The bird being the nucleus of a magnetic vibratory system, and being insu- lated witli its feathers, a gootl non-conductor, the bird has the power witli its wings to change in rapid succession the center of common pressure of the fourth condition of nioticni, up and down and forward, and the bird takes a visible resultant ])alh ; the faster the bird flies, the further forward the common CLMiter is thrown; the bird's orbicular motion forms a resultant with the axillary motion of the magnetic system around and in the l)ird's body and creates a pressure a little ahead of what it would be if the bird was at rest. The bird may have the power to change the common cen- ter to some extent. In- tlie volition of its will, by a contraction of its muscles through the operation of its nerves. I do not expect to gain credit from the scientific world 1)\- writing this pamphlet, for, amateur and unlettered as I am, I can- not claim that it has been done with that clearness and l)riiliancy which has distinguislied the writings of men like Faraday, Darwin and Pasteur; but I do expect to see the day when the scientific world will be as unwilling to admit the truth of Newton's theory of the laws of gravitation and the tides, as they now are to admit tho.se other theories that they had in their text books, such as, that nature abhors a vacuum, and that the stm's light was a radiation instead of a vibration through an intervening medium, aiid now in their text books, in their colloquial language, they say that bal- loons, hot air, etc., rise because they are light. In their older books it was stated more explicitly, and therefore much more clearl\ , that the\- possessed a qualit\' called "levity," which was opposed to heaviness; heaviness made things tend downward, levity made things tend upward ; it was a sort of action at a dis- tance, at least it would have required such an hypothesis if it had survived until Newton told them that heaviness was due to the action of the earth. I presume if .some scientist had not proved that the air had weight the text books by this time would have told us that levity was due to the action of Heaven, and where is the theory received from Newton, "gravity" in place of " heaviness, " any better than levity without a mechanical cause to support it? A mechan- ical cause was found for levil\-, and I i-laini that I have found a mechanical cause for gravity. Their " le\-it\- and i^iaxitx theory " acting ill opposite directions, u]) and down, acting at a distance without any claim of an intervening medium or mechauital cause, had as much reason to support it, as their theory i>l the two tides, one on each side of the earth, aiiing in opposite directions from a cause acting' in one direction. When Galileo said the earth revolved he was called crazy, and now that I say that tlie illusive, visible and resultant revolu- tion of the form that he discovered, is only the resultant product of the vibratory mechanical systems of the real invisible revolu- tions of the ultimate substance of the form, I, too, will be called crazy. But I will console myself with the knowledge that these people of to-day are but the descendants of those who murdered Socrates, tolerated the persecutions of Galileo, and deserted Columbus; that the evolution of the human race is slow and many errors mingle with the knowledge transmitted from one generation to another; and it is too often the case, at this late day of toleration and enlightenment, that the persons who are the first to discover these errors are denounced as cranks and lunatics. It is difficult to dislodge error from the minds of some men who have sustained and believed them for a life-time; " convince a man against his will, he's of the same opinion still." I will add : " \Mien proven wrong by facts and truth. Hell cling to hobbies taught in youth." So it is, both in science and religion, men will cling to the crude theories of ancient times without either reason or sense for their support, and they do this rather than believe in a new theory having both reason and sense for support, and carrying indisputa- ble facts for their conviction. 4} lUtiill i-iiiililll!!-' IQ 15083 Caylord Bros. Makers Syracuse, N Y. NtT.JIIM.24. I9es ill! Mil*! mi' W Hi: t" Hi!! gli! r 37441 i> UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 1 1: ■ il; m