w **$ H ■ . ■ L.4' ■ i'J mm «d- &\tf 6teJ^~ v "^ BY PROFESSOR HOLMES. CUEKENTS AND COIJNTEE-CUEEENTS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. With other Essays. 1 vol. 12mo. Uniform with this volume. Cloth, $ 1.26. TICKNOR AND FIELDS, Publishers. BOKDEE LINES OFMOWLEME IN SOME PROVINCES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AN INTRODUCTORY LECTURE, Delivered before the Medical Class of Harvard University, November 6th, 1861. By OLIVEE WENDELL HOLMES, M. D„ PARKMAN PROFESSOR OP ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. BOSTON: TIOKNOR AND FIELDS 18 62. . . . ' ■ . , . • ' . * tuOuOGt UB3A*& 2^ Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1862, by OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts. Cambridge: Which, Bigelow, and Company, Printers to the University. College Library, November 22, 1861. Professor 0. W. Holmes: — Dear Sir, — At a meeting of the Medical Class it was unanimously voted, that your Introductory Address be published. We therefore take much pleasure in requesting of you a copy for that purpose. Truly your friends, WM. J. RADFORD, Chairman. W. K. FLETCHER, W. H. MACDONALD, \ D. H. HAYDEN, '} Boston, November 25, 1861. Gentlemen: — It pleases me to comply with the request you have addressed me, in accordance with the vote of the Medical Class, to furnish you a copy of my Introductory Lecture for publication. Very truly your friend, 0. W. HOLMES. Messrs. Wm. J. Radford, Chairman. W. K. Fletcher, ~\ W. H. Macdonald, >• Committee. D. H. Hayden, ) 615817 TO THE READER This Lecture appears as it would have been delivered had the time allowed been less strictly limited. Passages necessarily omitted have been restored, and points briefly touched have been more fully considered. A few notes have been added for the benefit of that limited class of students who care to track an author through the high- ways and by-ways of his reading. I owe my thanks to several of my professional brethren who have communi- cated with me on subjects with which they are familiar ; especially to Dr. John Dean, for the opportunity of profit- ing by his unpublished labors, and to Dr. Hasket Derby, for information and references to recent authorities relating to the anatomy and physiology of the eye. LECTURE. The entrance upon a new course of Lectures is always a period of interest to instructors and pupils. As the birth of a child to a parent, so is the advent of a new class to a teacher. As the light of the untried world to the infant, so is the dawning of the light rest- ing over the unexplored realms of science to the stu- dent. In the name of the Faculty I welcome you, Gentlemen of the Medical Class, new-born babes of science, or lustier nurslings, to this morning of your medical life, and to the arms and the bosom of this ancient University. Fourteen years ago I stood in this place for the first time to address those who occu- pied these benches. As I recall these past seasons of our joint labors, I feel that they have been on the whole prosperous, and not undeserving of their pros- perity. For it has been my privilege to be associated with a body of true and faithful workers ; I cannot praise them freely to their faces, or I should be proud to discourse of the harmonious diligence and the noble spirit in which they have toiled together, not merely 6 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE to teach their several branches, but to elevate the whole standard of teaching. I may speak with less restraint of those gentlemen who have aided me in the most laborious part of my daily duties, the Demonstrators, to whom the succes- sive classes have owed so much of their instruction. They rise before me, the dead and the living, in the midst of the most grateful recollections. The fair, manly face and stately figure of my friend, Dr. Sam- uel Parkman, himself fit for the highest offices of teaching, yet willing to be my faithful assistant in the time of need, come back to me with the long sigh of regret for his early loss to our earthly companionship. Every year I speak the eulogy of Dr. Ainsworth's pa- tient toil as I show his elaborate preparations. When I take down my American Cyclopaedia and borrow in- struction from the learned articles of Dr. Kneeland, I cease to regret that his indefatigable and intelligent industry was turned into a broader channel. And what can I say too cordial of my long associated com- panion and friend, Dr. Hodges, whose admirable skill, working through the swiftest and surest fingers that ever held a scalpel among us, has delighted class after class, and filled our Museum with monuments which will convey his name to unborn generations ? This day belongs, however, not to myself and my recollections, but to all of us who teach and all of you who listen, whether experts in our specialties or aliens to their mysteries, or timid neophytes just entering the IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 7 portals of the hall of science. Look in with me, then, while I attempt to throw some rays into its interior, which shall illuminate a few of its pillars and cornices, and show at the same time how many niches and al- coves remain in darkness. Science is the topography of ignorance. From a few elevated points we triangulate vast spaces, enclosing in- finite unknown details. We cast the lead, and draw up a little sand from abysses we shall never reach with our dredges. The best part of our knowledge is that which teaches us where knowledge leaves off and ignorance begins. Nothing more clearly separates a vulgar from a supe- rior mind, than the confusion in the first between the little that it truly knows, on the one hand, and what it half knows and what it thinks it knows, on the other. That which is true of every subject is especially true of the branch of knowledge which deals with living beings. Their existence is a perpetual death and re- animation. Their identity is only an idea, for we put off our bodies many times during our lives, and dress in new suits of bones and muscles.* " Thou art not thyself; . For thou exist' st on many a thousand grains N That issue out of dust." * " Occasio enim praeceps est propter artis materiam, dico autem cor- pus, quod continue Suit et momento temporis transmutatur." — Galen. Com. in Aphorism. Hippoc. 1. 1. 8 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE If it is true that we understand ourselves but imper- fectly in health, it is more signally manifest in disease, where natural actions imperfectly understood, disturbed in an obscure way by half-seen causes, are creeping and winding along in the dark toward their destined issue, sometimes using our remedies as safe stepping-stones, occasionally, it may be, stumbling over them as ob- stacles. I propose in this lecture to show you some points of contact between our ignorance and our knowledge in several of the branches upon the study of which you are entering. I may teach you a very little directly, but I hope much more from the trains of thought I shall suggest. Do not expect too much ground to be covered in this rapid survey. Our task is only that of sending out a few pickets under the starry flag of sci- ence to the edge of that dark domain where the ensigns of the obstinate rebel, Ignorance, are flying undisputed. We are not making a reconnoissance in force, still less advancing with the main column. But here are a few roads along which we have to march together, and we wish to see clearly how far our lines extend, and where the enemy's outposts begin. Before touching the branches of knowledge that deal with organization and vital functions, let us glance at that science which meets you at the threshold of your study, and prepares you in some measure to deal with the more complex problems of the living laboratory. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 9 Chemistry includes the art of separating and com- bining the elements of matter, and the study of the changes produced by these operations. We can hardly say too much of what it has contributed to our knowl- edge of the universe and our power of dealing with its materials. It has given us a catalogue raisonnS of the substances found upon our planet, and shown how everything living and dead is put together from them. It is accomplishing wonders before us every day, such as Arabian story-tellers used to string together in their fables. It spreads the sensitive film on the artificial retina which looks upon us through the optician's lens for a few seconds, and fixes an image that will outlive its original. It questions the light of the sun, and de- tects the vaporized metals floating around the great luminary, — iron, sodium, lithium, and the rest, — as if the chemist of our remote planet could fill his bell- glasses from its fiery atmosphere.* It lends the power which flashes our messages in thrills that leave the lazy chariot of day behind them. It seals up a few dark grains in iron vases, and lo ! at the touch of a single spark, rises in smoke and flame a mighty Afrit with a voice like thunder and an arm that shatters like an earthquake. The dreams of Oriental fancy have be- come the sober facts of our every-day life, and the chemist is the magician to whom we owe them. To return to the colder scientific aspect of chemis- * Scientific Annual for 1861. — Fairbairn's Address before the British Association, 1861. 10 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE try. It has shown us how bodies stand affected to each other through an almost boundless range of com- binations. It has given us a most ingenious theory to account for certain fixed relations in these combina- tions. It has successfully eliminated a great number of proximate compounds, more or less stable, from or- ganic structures. It has invented others which form the basis of long series of well-known composite sub- stances. In fact, we are perhaps becoming overbur- dened with our list of proximate principles, demon- strated and hypothetical. How much nearer have we come to the secret of force than Lully and Geber and the whole crew of juggling alchemists ? We have learned a great deal about the how, what have we learned about the why ? Why does iron rust, while gold remains untarnished, and gold amalgamate, while iron refuses the alliance of mercury ? The alchemists called gold Sol, the sun, and iron Mars, and pleased themselves with fancied relations between these substances and the heavenly bodies, by which they pretended to explain the facts they ob- served. Some of their superstitions have lingered in practical medicine to the present day, but chemistry has grown wise enough to confess the fact of absolute ignorance. What is it that makes common salt crystallize in the form of cubes, and saltpetre in the shape of six-sided prisms ? We see no reason why it should not have W MEDICAL SCIENCE. 11 been just the other way, salt in prisms and saltpetre in cubes, or why either should take an exact geometri- cal outline, any more than coagulating albumen. But although we had given up attempting to explain the essential nature of affinities and of crystalline types, we might have supposed that we had at least fixed the identity of the substances with which we deal, and de- termined the laws of their combination. All at once we find that a simple substance changes face, puts off its characteristic qualities and resumes them at will; — not merely when we liquefy or vaporize a solid, or reverse the process ; but that a solid is literally transformed into another solid under our own eyes. We thought we knew phosphorus. We warm a portion of it sealed in an empty tube, for about a week. It has become a brown infusible substance, which does not shine in the dark nor oxidate in the air. We heat it to 500° F., and it becomes common phosphorus again. We trans- mute sulphur in the same singular way. Nature, you know, gives us carbon in the shape of coal and in that of the diamond. It is easy to call these changes by the name allotrojoism, but not the less do they confound our hasty generalizations. These facts of allotropism have some corollaries con- nected with them rather startling to us of the nine- teenth century. There may be other transmutations possible besides those of phosphorus and sulphur, When Dr. Prout, in 1840, talked about azote and car- bon being "formed" in the living system, it was 12 BOEDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE looked upon as one of those freaks of fancy to which philosophers, like other men, are subject. But when Professor Faraday, in 1851, says, at a meeting of the British Association, that " his hopes are in the direc- tion of proving that bodies called simple were really compounds, and may be formed artificially as soon as we are masters of the laws influencing their combina- tions," — when he comes forward and says that he has tried experiments at transmutation, and means, if his life is spared, to try them again, — how can we be sur- prised at the popular story of 1861, that Louis Napo- leon has established a gold-factory and is glutting the mints of Europe with bullion of his own making ? And so with reference to the law of combinations. The old maxim was, Corpora non agunt nisi soluta. If two substances, a and b, are enclosed in a glass vessel, c, we do not expect the glass to change them, unless a or b or the compound a b has the power of dissolving the glass. But if for a I take oxygen, for b hydrogen, and for c & piece of spongy platinum, I find the first two combine with the common signs of combustion and form water, the third in the mean time under- going no perceptible change. It has played the part of the unwedded priest, who marries a pair without taking a fee or having any further relation with the parties. We call this catalysis, catalytic action, the ac- tion of presence, or by what learned name we choose. Give what name to it we will, it is a manifestation of power which crosses our established laws of combina- IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 13 tion at a very open angle of intersection. I think we may find an analogy for it in electrical induction, the disturbance of the equilibrium of the electricity of a body by the approach of a charged body to it, without interchange of electrical conditions between the two bodies. But an analogy is not an explanation, and why a few drops of yeast should change a saccharine ' mixture to carbonic acid and alcohol, — a little leaven leavening the whole lump, — not by combining with it, but by setting a movement at work, we not only can- not explain, but the fact is such an exception to the recognized laws of combination, that Liebig is unwilling to admit the new force at all to which Berzelius had given the name so generally accepted. The phenomena of isomerism, or identity of compo- sition and proportions of constituents with difference / of qualities, and of isomorphism, or identity of form in crystals which have one element substituted for another, were equally surprises to science ; and although the mechanism by which they are brought about can be to a certain extent explained by a reference to the hypothetical atoms of which the elements are consti- tuted, yet this is only turning the difficulty into a frac- tion with an infinitesimal denominator and an infinite numerator. So far we have studied the working of force and its seeming anomalies in purely chemical phenomena. But we soon find that chemical force is developed by various other physical agencies, — by heat, by light, by 14 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE electricity, by magnetism, by mechanical agencies ; and, vice versa, that chemical action develops heat, light, electricity, magnetism, mechanical force, as we see in our matches, galvanic batteries, and explosive compounds. Proceeding with our experiments, we find that every kind of force is capable of producing all other kinds, or, in Mr. Faraday's language, that " the. various forms under which the forces of matter are made manifest have a common origin, or, in other words, are so directly related and mutually dependent that they are convertible one into another." Out of this doctrine naturally springs that of the conservation of force, so ably illustrated by Mr. Grove, Dr. Carpenter, and Mr. Faraday. This idea is no novelty, though it seems so at first sight. It was maintained and disputed among the giants of philos- ophy. Des Cartes and Leibnitz denied that any new motion originated in nature, or that any ever ceased to exist ; all motion being in a circle, passing from one body to another, one losing what the other gained. Newton, on the other hand, believed that new motions were generated and existing ones destroyed. On the first supposition, there is a fixed amount of force al- ways circulating in the universe. On the second, the total amount may be v increasing or diminishing. You will find in the Annual of Scientific Discovery for 1858 a very interesting lecture by Professor Helm- holtz of Bonn, in which it is maintained that a cer- tain portion of force is lost in every natural process, IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 15 being converted into unchangeable heat, so that the universe will come to a stand-still at last, all force pass- ing into heat, and all heat into a state of equilibrium. The doctrines of the convertibility or specific equiv- alence of the various forms of force, and of its conser- vation, which is its logical consequence, are very gen- erally accepted, as I believe, at the present time, among physicists. We are naturally led to the ques- tion, What is the nature of force ? The three illus- trious philosophers just referred to agree in attributing the general movements of the universe to the imme- diate Divine action.* The doctrine of " pre-established harmony'' was an especial contrivance of Leibnitz to remove the Creator from unworthy association with the less divine acts of living beings. Obsolete as this expression sounds to our ears, the phrase laws of the universe, which we use so contantly with a wider ap- plication, appears to me essentially identical with it. Force does not admit of explanation, nor of proper * " Et generalem quod attinet, manifestum mihi videtur illam [causam] non aliam esse, quam Deum ipsum, qui materiam simul cum motu et quiete in principio creavit, jamque per solum suum concursum ordinarium, tantundem motus et quietis in ea tota quantum tunc posuit conservat: .... eodem plane modo, eademque ratione qua prius creavit, eum etiam tantun- dem motus in ipsa semper conservare." — Des Cartes, Princ. Phil., P. II. § XXXVI. " Concursus Dei, actioni creaturse necessarius." — Leibnitz, Op., Tom. VI. p. 174. " In ipso continentur et moventur universa, sed absque mutua passione. Deus nihil patitur ex corporum motibus : ilia nullam sentiunt resistentiam ex omniprgesentia Dei." — Newton, Principia, Lib. III. Schol. Gen. / 16 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE definition, any more than the hypothetical substratum of matter. If we assume the Infinite as omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent, we cannot suppose Him ex- cluded from any part of His creation, except from rebellious souls which voluntarily exclude Him by the exercise of their fatal prerogative of free-will.* Force, then, is the act of immanent Divinity. I find no meaning in mechanical explanations. Newton's hy- pothesis of an ether filling the heavenly spaces does not, I confess, help my conceptions. I will, and the muscles of my vocal organs shape my speech. God wills, and the universe articulates His power, wisdom, and goodness. That is all I know. There is no bridge my mind can throw from the "immaterial" cause to the "material" effect. The problem of force meets us everywhere, and I prefer to encounter it in the world of physical phenom- ena before reaching that of living actions. It is#only the name for the incomprehensible cause of certain changes known to our consciousness, and assumed to be outside of it. For me it is the Deity Himself in action. I can therefore see a large significance in the some- * M Cum unaquaeque spatii particula sit semper, et unumquodque duratio- nis indivisibile momentum ubique; certe rerum omnium Fabricator ac Dominus non erit nunquam nusquam. Omniprsesens est non per virtutem solam, sed etiam per substantiam ; nam virtus sine substantia subsistere non potest." — Newton, loc. cit. " The Lord of all, himself through all diffused, Sustains and is the life of all that lives." The Task, B. VI. 1. 221, 222. / IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 17 what bold language of Burdach : " There is for me but one miracle, that of infinite existence, and but one mystery, the manner in which the finite proceeds from the infinite. So soon as we recognize this incompre- hensible act as the general and primordial miracle, of which our reason perceives the necessity, but the man- ner of which our intelligence cannot grasp, so soon as we contemplate the nature known to us by experience, in this light, there is for us no other impenetrable mir- acle or mystery." * Let us turn to a branch of knowledge which deals with certainties up to the limit of the senses, and is involved in no speculations beyond them. In certain points of view, Human Anatomy may be considered an almost exhausted science. From time to time some small organ which had escaped earlier observers has been pointed out, — such parts as the tensor tarsi, the otic ganglion, or the Pacinian bodies; but some of our best anatomical works are those which have been classic for many generations. The plates of the bones in Vesalius, three centuries old, are still masterpieces of accuracy, as of art. The magnificent work of Albi- nus on the muscles, published in 1747, is still supreme in its department, as the constant references of the most thorough recent treatise on the subject, that of Theile, sufficiently show. More has been done in unravelling the mysteries of the fasciae, but there has * Physiologie, Trad, de Jourdan, II. 326. 18 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE been a tendency to overdo this kind of material analy- sis. Alexander Thomson split them up into cobwebs, as you may see in the plates to Velpeau's Surgical Anatomy. I well remember how he used to shake his head over the coarse work of Scarpa and Astley Cooper, — as if Denner, who painted the separate hairs of the beard and pores of the skin in his portraits, had spoken lightly of the pictures of Rubens and Vandyk. Not only has little been added to the catalogue of parts, but some things long known had become half- forgotten. Louis and others confounded the solitary glands of the lower part of the small intestine with those which " the great Brunner," as Haller calls him, described in 1687 as being found in the duodenum. The display of the fibrous structure of the brain seemed a novelty as shown by Spurzheim. One is startled to find the method anticipated by Raymond Vieussens nearly two centuries ago. I can hardly think Gordon had ever looked at his figures, though he names their author, when he wrote the captious and sneering arti- cle which attracted so much attention in the pages of the Edinburgh Review.* This is the place, if anywhere, to mention any ob- servations I could pretend to have made in the course of my teaching the structure of the human body. I can make no better show than most of my predecessors in this well-reaped field. The nucleated cells found connected with the cancellated structure of the bones, * June, 1815. W MEDICAL SCIENCE. 19 which I first pointed out and had figured in 1847, and have shown yearly from that time to the present, and the fossa rnasseterica, a shallow concavity on the ramus of the lower jaw, for the lodgement of the masseter muscle, which acquires significance when examined by the side of the deep cavity on the corresponding part in some carnivora to which it answers, may perhaps be claimed as deserving attention. I have also pleased myself by making a special group of the six radiating muscles * which diverge from the spine of the axis, or second cervical vertebra, and by giving to it the name Stella musculosa nuchce. But this scanty catalogue is only an evidence that one may teach long and see little that has not been noted by those who have gone before him. Of course I do not think it necessary to include rare, but already described anomalies, such as the epi- sternal bones, the rectus sternalis, and other interesting exceptional formations I have encountered, which have shown a curious tendency to present themselves sev- eral times in the same season, perhaps because the first specimen found calls our attention to any we may subsequently meet with. The anatomy of the scalpel and the amphitheatre was, then, becoming an exhausted branch of investiga- tion. But during the present century the study of the human body has changed its old aspect, and become fertile in new observations. This rejuvenescence was * Rectus capitis posticus major, obliquus capitis inferior, and semispinalis colli, on each side. 20 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE effected by means of two principal agencies, — new methods and a new instrument. Descriptive anatomy, as known from an early date, is to the body what geography is to the planet. Now geography was pretty well known so long ago as when Arrowsmith, who was born in 1750, published his ad- mirable maps. But in that same year was born Wer- ner, who taught a new way of studying the earth, since become familiar to us all under the name of Geology. What geology has done for our knowledge of the earth, has been done for our knowledge of the body by that method of study to which is given the name of General Anatomy. It studies, not the organs as such, but the elements out of which the organs are con- structed. It is the geology of the body, as that is the general anatomy of the earth. The extraordinary genius of Bichat, to whom more than any other we owe this new method of study, does not require Mr. Buckle's testimony to impress the practitioner with the importance of its achievements. I have heard a very wise physician question whether any important result had accrued to practical medicine from Harvey's discovery of the circulation. But Anatomy, Physiol- ogy, and Pathology have received a new light from this novel method of contemplating the living struc- tures, which has had a vast influence in enabling the practitioner at least to distinguish and predict the course of disease. We know as well what differences IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 21 to expect in the habits of a mucous and of a serous membrane, as what mineral substances to look for in the chalk or the coal measures. You have only to read Cullen's description of inflammation of the lungs or of the bowels, and compare it with such as you may find in Laennec or Watson, to see the immense gain which diagnosis and prognosis have derived from gen- eral anatomy. The second new method of studying the human structure, beginning with the labors of Scarpa, Burns, and Colles, grew up principally during the first third of this century. It does not deal with organs, as did the earlier anatomists, nor with tissues, after the manner of Bichat. It maps the whole surface of the body into an arbitrary number of regions, and studies each region successively from the surface to the bone, or beneath it. This hardly deserves the name of a sci- ence, although Velpeau has dignified it with that title, but it furnishes an admirable practical way for the sur- geon who has to operate on a particular region of the body to study that region. If we are buying a farm, we are not content with the State map or a geological chart including the estate in question. We demand an exact survey of that particular property, so that we may know what we are dealing with. This is just what regional, or, as it is sometimes called, surgical anatomy, does for the surgeon with reference to the part on which his skill is to be exercised. It enables him to see with the mind's eye through the opaque tis- 22 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE sues down to the bone on which they he, as if the skin were transparent as the cornea, and the organs it cov- ers translucent as the gelatinous pulp of a medusa. It is curious that the Japanese should have antici- pated Europe in a kind of rude regional anatomy. I have seen a manikin of Japanese make traced all over with lines, and points marking their intersection. By this their doctors are guided in the performance of acu- puncture, marking the safe places to thrust in needles, as we buoy out our ship-channels, and doubtless indi- cating to learned eyes the spots where incautious med- dling had led to those little accidents of shipwreck to which patients are unfortunately liable. A change of method, then, has given us General and Regional Anatomy. These, too, have been worked so thoroughly, that, if not exhausted, they have at least become to a great extent fixed and pos- itive branches of knowledge. But the first of them, General Anatomy, would never have reached this positive condition but for the introduction of that in- strument which I have mentioned as the second great aid to modern progress. This instrument is the achromatic microscope. For the history of the successive steps by which it became the effective scientific implement we now possess, I must refer you to the work of Mr. Quekett, to an excellent article in the Penny Cyclopaedia, or to that of Sir David Brewster in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. It is a most interesting piece of scientific history, which IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 23 shows how the problem that Biot in 1821 pronounced insolvable was in the course of a few years practically solved, with a success equal to that which Dollond had long before obtained with the telescope. It is enough for our purpose that we are now in possession of an instrument freed from all confusions and illusions, / which magnifies a thousand diameters, — a million times in surface, — without serious distortion or dis- coloration of its object. A quarter of a century ago, or a little more, an instructor would not have hesitated to put John Bell's Anatomy and Bostock's Physiology into a student's hands, as good authority on their respective subjects. Let us not be unjust to either of these authors. John I Bell is the liveliest medical writer that I can remember who has written since the days of delightful old Am- broise Pare*. His picturesque descriptions and bold figures are as good now as they ever were, and his book can never become obsolete. But listen to what John Bell says of the microscope : — " Philosophers of the last age had been at infinite pains to find the ultimate fibre of muscles, thinking to discover its properties in its form ; but they saw just in proportion to the glasses which they used, or to their practice and skill in that art, which is now almost for- saken." * n Dr. Bostock's work, neglected as it is, is one which I value very highly as a really learned compilation, full * Anat. and Phys. of the Human Body, I. 273. 24 BOEDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE of original references. But Dr. Bostock says : " Much as the naturalist has been indebted to the microscope, by bringing into view many beings of which he could not otherwise have ascertained the existence, the physi- ologist has not yet derived any great benefit from the instrument." * These are only specimens of the manner in which the microscope and its results were generally regarded by the generation just preceding our own. I have referred you to the proper authorities for the account of those improvements which about the year 1830 rendered the compound microscope an efficient and trustworthy instrument. It was now for the first time that a true general anatomy became possible. As early as 1816 Treviranus had attempted to resolve the tissues, of which Bichat had admitted no less than twenty-one, into their simple microscopic elements. How could such an attempt succeed, Henle well asks,f at a time when the most extensively diffused of all the tissues, the areolar, was not at all under- stood ? All that method could do had been accom- plished by Bichat and his followers. It was for the optician to take the next step. The future of anatomy and physiology, as an enthusiastic micrologist of the time said, was in the hands of Messrs. Schieck and Pistor, famous opticians of Berlin. In those earlier days of which I am speaking, all * Physiology, p. 281. f Anatomie Generate, (Trad, de Jourdan,) I. 125. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 25 the points of minute anatomy were involved in obscu- rity. Some found globules everywhere, some fibres. Students disputed whether the conjunctiva extended over the cornea or not, and worried themselves over Gaultier de Claubry's stratified layers of the skin, or Breschet's blennogenous and chromatogenous organs. The dartos was a puzzle, the central spinal canal a myth, the decidua clothed in fable as much as the golden fleece. The structure of bone, now so beauti- fully made out, — even that of the teeth, in which old Leeuwenhoek, peeping with his octogenarian eyes through the minute lenses wrought with his own hands, had long ago seen the " pipes," as he called them, — was hardly known at all. The minute structure of the viscera lay in the mists of an uncertain microscopic vision. The intimate recesses of the animal system were to the students of anatomy what the interior of Africa long was to geographers, and the stories of microscopic explorers were as much sneered at as those of Bruce or Du Chaillu, and with better reason. Now what have we come to in our own day ? In the first place, the minute structure of all the organs has been made out in the most satisfactory way. The special arrangements of the vessels and the ducts of all the glands, of the air- tubes and vesicles of the lungs, of the parts which make up the skin and other mem- branes, all the details of those complex parenchymatous organs which had confounded investigation so long, have been lifted out of the invisible into the sight of all 2 26 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE observers. It is fair to mention here, that we owe a great deal to the art of minute injection, by which we are enabled to trace the smallest vessels in the midst of the tissues where they are distributed. This is an old artifice of anatomists. The famous Ruysch, who died a hundred and thirty years ago, showed that each of the viscera has its terminal vessels arranged in its own peculiar way ; * the same fact which you may see illustrated in Gerber's figures after the minute injec- tions of Berres.f I hope to show you many specimens of this kind in the microscope, the work of English and American hands. Professor Agassiz allows me also to make use of a very rich collection of injected prepara- tions sent him by Professor Hyrtl, formerly of Prague, now of Vienna, for the proper exhibition of which I had a number of microscopes made expressly, by Mr. Grunow, during the past season. All this illustrates what has been done for the elucidation of the intimate details of formation of the organs. But the great triumph of the microscope as applied to anatomy has been in the resolution of the organs and the tissues into their simple constituent anatomical elements. It has taken up general anatomy where Bichat left it. He had succeeded in reducing the structural language of nature to syllables, if you will permit me to use so bold an image. The microscopic observers who have come after him have analyzed these * Haller, Bibl. Anat., I. 633. t General and Minute Anatomy, (London, 1842,) Plate XXIIL EN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 27 into letters, as we may call them, — the simple elements by the combination of which Nature spells out succes- sively tissues, which are her syllables, organs which are her words, systems which are her chapters, and so goes on from the simple to the complex, until she binds up in one living whole that wondrous volume of power and wisdom which we call the human body. The alphabet of the organization is so short and simple, that I will risk fatiguing your attention by re- peating it, according to the plan I have long adopted. A. Cells, either floating, as in the blood, or fixed, like those in the cancellated structure of bone, already referred to. Very commonly they have undergone a change of figure, most frequently a flattening which reduces them to scales, as in the epidermis and the epithelium. B. Simple, translucent, homogeneous solid, such as is found at the back of the cornea, or forming the intercellular substance of cartilage. C. The white fibrous element, consisting of very delicate, tenacious threads. This is the long-staple textile substance of the body. It is to the organism what cotton is pretended to be to our Southern States. It pervades the whole animal fabric as areolar tissue, which is the universal packing and wrapping material. It forms the ligaments which bind the whole frame- work together. It furnishes the sinews, which are the channels of power. It enfolds every muscle. It wraps the brain in its hard, insensible folds, and the heart itself beats in a purse that is made of it. 28 BOEDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE D. The yellow elastic, fibrous element, the caout- chouc of the animal mechanism, which pulls things back into place, as the india-rubber band shuts the door we have opened. E. The striped muscular fibre, — the red flesh, which shortens itself in obedience to the will, and thus produces all voluntary active motion. F. The unstriped muscular fibre, more properly the fusiform-cell fibre, which carries on the involun- tary internal movements. G. The nerve-cylinder, a glassy tube, with a pith of some firmness, which conveys sensation to the brain and the principle which induces motion from it. H. The nerve-corpuscle, the centre of nervous power. I. The mucous tissue, as Virchow calls it, common in embryonic structures, seen in the vitreous humor of the adult. To these add X, granules, of indeterminate shape and size, Y, for inorganic matters, such as the salts of bone and teeth, and Z, to stand as a symbol of the fluids, and you have the letters of what I have ven- tured to call the alphabet of the body. But just as in language certain diphthongs and syl- lables are frequently recurring, so we have in the body certain secondary and tertiary combinations, which we meet more frequently than the solitary elements of which they are composed. Thus A B, or a collection of cells united by simple IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 29 structureless solid, is seen to be extensively employed in the body under the name of cartilage. Out of this the surfaces of the articulations and the springs of the breathing apparatus are formed. But when Nature came to the buffers of the spinal column (interverte- bral disks) and the washers of the joints (semilunar fibro-cartilages of the knee, etc.), she required more tenacity than common cartilage possessed. What did she do ? What does man do in a similar case of need ? I need hardly tell you. The mason lays his bricks in simple mortar. But the plasterer works some hair into the mortar which he is going to lay in large sheets on the walls. The children of Israel complained that they had no straw to make their bricks with, though portions of it may still be seen in the crumbling pyra- mid of Darshour, which they are said to have built. I visited the old house on Witch Hill in Salem a year or two ago, and there I found the walls coated with clay in which straw was abundantly mingled; — the old Judaizing witch-hangers copied the Israelites in a good many things. The Chinese and the Corsicans blend the fibres of amianthus in their pottery to give it tenacity. Now to return to Nature. To make her buffers and washers hold together in the shocks to which they would be subjected, she took common car- tilage and mingled the white fibrous tissue with it, to serve the same purpose as the hair in the mortar, the straw in the bricks and in the plaster of the old wall, and the amianthus in the earthen vessels. Thus we 30 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE have the combination ABC, or fibro-cartilage. Again, the bones were once only gristle or cartilage, A B. To give them solidity they were infiltrated with stone, in the form of salts of lime, an inorganic element, so that bone would be spelt out by the letters A, B, and Y. If from these organic syllables we proceed to form organic words, we shall find that Nature employs three principal forms ; namely, Vessels, Membranes, and Parenchyma, or visceral tissue. The most com- plex of them can be resolved into a combination of these few simple anatomical constituents. Passing for a moment into the domain of Pathologi- cal Anatomy, we find the same elements in morbid growths that we have met with in normal structures. The pus-corpuscle and the white blood-corpuscle can only be distinguished by tracing them to their origin. A frequent form of so-called malignant disease proves to be only a collection of altered epithelium-cells. Even cancer itself has no specific anatomical ele- ment, and the diagnosis of a cancerous tumor by the microscope, though tolerably sure under the eye of an expert, is based upon accidental, and not essential points, — the crowding together of the elements, the size of the cell-nuclei, and similar variable characters. Let us turn to Physiology. The microscope, which has made a new science of the intimate structure of the organs, has at the same time cleared up many IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 31 uncertainties concerning the mechanism of the special functions. Up -to the time of the living generation of observers, Nature had kept over all her inner work- shops the forbidding inscription, No Admittance! If any prying observer ventured to spy through his mag- nifying tubes into the mysteries of her glands and canals and fluids, she covered up her work in blinding mists and bewildering halos, as the deities of old con- cealed their favored heroes in the moment of danger. Science has at length sifted the turbid light of her lenses, and blanched their delusive rainbows. Anatomy studies the organism in space. Physiol- ogy studies it also in time. After the study of form and composition follows close that of action, and this leads us along back to the first moment of the germ, and forward to the resolution of the living frame into its lifeless elements. In this way Anatomy, or rather that branch of it which we call Histology, has become inseparably blended with the study of function. The connection between the science of life and that of in- timate structure on the one hand, and composition on the other, is illustrated in the titles of two recent works of remarkable excellence, — the Physiological Anato- my of Todd and Bowman, and the Physiological Chemistry of Lehmann. Let me briefly recapitulate a few of our acquisitions in Physiology, due in large measure to our new instru- ments and methods of research, and at the same time indicate the limits which form the permanent or the 32 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE temporary boundaries of our knowledge. I will begin with the largest fact and with the most absolute and universally encountered limitation. The " largest truth in Physiology " Mr. Paget con- siders to be " the development of ova through multi- plication and division of their cells." I would state it more broadly as the agency of the cell in all living processes. It seems at present necessary to abandon the original idea of Schwann, that we can observe the building up of a cell from the simple granules of a blastema, or formative fluid. The evidence points rather towards the axiom, Omnis cellula e cellula ; that is, the germ of a new cell is always derived from a pre-existing cell. The doctrine of Schwann, as I re- marked long ago (1844), runs parallel with the nebu- lar theory in astronomy, and they may yet stand or fall together. As we have seen Nature anticipating the plasterer in fibro-cartilage, so we see her beforehand with the glass-blower in her dealings with the cell. The artisan blows his vitreous bubbles, large or small, to be used afterwards as may be wanted. So Nature shapes her hyaline vesicles and modifies them to serve the needs of the part where they are found. The artisan whirls his rod, and his glass bubble becomes a flattened disk, with its bull's-eye for a nucleus. These lips of ours are all glazed with microscopic tiles formed of flattened cells, each one of them with its nucleus still as plain and relatively as prominent, to the eye of the micro- IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 33 scopist, as the bull's-eye in the old-fashioned window- pane. Everywhere we find cells, modified or un- changed. They roll in inconceivable multitudes (five millions and more to the cubic millimetre, according to Vierordt*) as blood-disks through our vessels. A close-fitting mail of flattened cells coats our surface with a panoply of imbricated scales, (more than twelve thousand millions, as Harting has computed,!) as true a defence against our enemies as the buckler of the armadillo or the carapace of the tortoise against theirs. The same little protecting organs pave all the great highways of the interior system. Cells, again, preside over the chemical processes which elaborate the living fluids ; they change their form to become the agents of voluntary and involuntary motion ; the soul itself sits on a throne of nucleated cells, and flashes its mandates through skeins of glassy filaments which once were simple chains of vesicles. And, as if to reduce the problem of living force to its simplest expression, we see the yolk of a transparent egg dividing itself in whole or in part, and again dividing and subdividing, until it becomes a mass of cells, out of which the harmonious diversity of the organs arranges itself, worm or man, as God has willed from the beginning. This differentiation having been effected, each sev- eral part assumes its special office, having a life of its own, adjusted to that of other parts and the whole. * Kolliker, Manual, etc., (London, I860,) p. 518. t Valentin's Physiology, (Brinton's Transl.,) p. 13. 2* c 34 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE " Just as a tree constitutes a mass arranged in a definite manner, in which, in every single part, in the leaves as in the root, in the trunk as in the blossom, cells are discovered to be the ultimate elements, so is it also with the forms of animal life. Every animal presents itself as a sum of vital unities, every one of which manifests all the characteristics of life."* The mechanism is as clear, as unquestionable, as ab- solutely settled and universally accepted, as the order of movement of the heavenly bodies, which we com- pute backward to the days of the observatories on the plains of Shinar, and on the faith of which we regulate the movements of war and trade by the predictious of our ephemeris. The mechanism, and that is all. We see the work- man and the tools, but the skill that guides the work and the power that performs it are as invisible as ever. I fear that not every listener took the significance of those pregnant words in the passage I quoted from John Bell, — a thinking to discover its jproperties in its form" We have discovered the working bee in this great hive of organization. We have detected the cell in the very act of forming itself from a nucleus, of transforming itself into various tissues, of selecting the elements of various secretions. But why one cell be- comes nerve and another muscle, why one selects bile and another fat, we can no more pretend to tell, than why one grape sucks out of the soil the generous juice * Virchow, Cellular Pathology, Lect. I. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 35 which princes hoard in their cellars, and another the wine which it takes three men to drink, — one to pour it down, another to swallow it, and a third to hold him while it is going down. Certain analogies between this selecting power and the phenomena of endosmosis in the elective affinities of chemistry we can find, but the problem of foroe remains here, as everywhere, unsolved and insolvable. Do we gain anything by attempting to get rid of the idea of a special vital force because we find certain mutually convertible relations between forces in the body and out of it ? I think not, any more than we should gain by getting rid of the idea and expression Magnetism because of its correlation with electricity. We may concede the unity of all forms of force, but we cannot overlook the fixed differences of its manifes- tations according to the conditions under which it acts. It is a mistake, however, to think the mystery is greater in an organized body than in any other. We see a stone fall or a crystal form, and there is nothing stran- ger left to wonder at, for we have seen the Infinite in action. Just so far as we can recognize the ordinary modes of operation of the common forces of nature, — gravity, cohesion, elasticity, transudation, chemical action, and the rest, — we see the so-called vital acts in the light of a larger range of known facts and familiar analogies. Matteucci's well-remembered lectures contain many and striking examples of the working of physical forces 36 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE in physiological processes. Wherever rigid experiment carries us, we are safe in following this lead ; but the moment we begin to theorize beyond our strict observa- tion, we are in danger of falling into those mechanical follies which true science has long outgrown. Recognizing the fact, then, that we have learned nothing but the machinery of life, and are no nearer to its essence, what is it that we have gained by this great discovery of the cell formation and function ? It would have been reward enough to learn the method Nature pursues for its own sake. If the sov- ereign Artificer lets us into his own laboratories and workshops, we need not ask more than the privilege of looking on at his work. We do not know where we now stand in the hierarchy of created intelligences. We were made a little lower than the angels. I speak it not irreverently ; as the lower animals surpass man in some of their attributes, so it may be that not every angel's eye can see as broadly and as deeply into the material works of God as man himself, looking at the firmament through an equatorial of fifteen inches' aper- ture, and searching into the tissues with a twelfth of an inch objective. But there are other positive gains of a more practi- cal character. Thus we are no longer permitted to place the seat of the living actions in the extreme ves- sels, which are only the carriers from which each part takes what it wants by the divine right of the omnipo- tent nucleated cell. The organism has become, in the IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 37 words already borrowed from Virchow, " a sum of vital unities." The strictum and laxum, the increased and diminished action of the vessels, out of which medical theories and methods of treatment have grown up, have yielded to the doctrine of local cell-communities, be- longing to this or that vascular district, from which they help themselves, as contractors are wont to do from the national treasury. I cannot promise to do more than to select a few of the points of contact between our ignorance and our knowledge which present particular interest in the ex- isting state of physiological knowledge. Some of them involve the microscopic discoveries of which I have been speaking, some belong to the domain of chemistry, and some have relations with other departments of physical science. If we should begin with the digestive function, we should find that the long-agitated question of the nature of the acid of the gastric juice is becoming settled in favor of the lactic. But the whole solvent agency of the digestive fluid enters into the category of that ex- ceptional mode of action already familiar to us in chemistry as catalysis. It is therefore doubly difficult of explanation ; first, as being, like all reactions, a fact not to be accounted for except by the imaginative ap- peal to " affinity," and secondly, as being one of those peculiar reactions provoked by an element which stands outside and looks on without compromising itself. The doctrine of Mulder, so widely diffused in popu- 38 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE lar and scientific belief, of the existence of a common base of all albuminous substances, the so-called protein, has not stood the test of rigorous analysis. The divis- ion of food into azotized and non-azotized is no doubt important, but the attempt to show that the first only is plastic or nutritive, while the second is simply calori- facient, or heat-producing, fails entirely in the face of the facts revealed by the study of man in different cli- mates, and of numerous experiments in the feeding of animals. I must return to this subject in connection with the respiratory function. The sugar-making faculty of the liver is another " catalytic " mystery, as great as the rest of them, and no greater. Liver-tissue brings sugar out of the blood, or out of its own substance ; — why ? Quia est in eo Virtus saccharitiva. Just what becomes of the sugar beyond the fact of its disappearance before it can get into the general circula- tion and sweeten our tempers, it is hard to say. The pancreatic fluid makes an emulsion of the fat contained in our food, but just how the fatty particles get into the villi we must leave Briicke and Kolliker to settle if they can. No one has shown satisfactorily the process by which the blood-corpuscles are formed out of the lymph-cor- puscles, nor what becomes of them. These two ques- tions are like those famous household puzzles, — Where do the flies come from ? and, Where do the pins go to ? IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 39 There is a series of organs in the body which has long puzzled physiologists, — organs of glandular aspect, but having no ducts, — the spleen, the thyroid and thymus bodies, and the suprarenal capsules. We call them vascular glands, and we believe that they elabo- rate colored and uncolored blood-cells ; but just what changes they effect, and just how they effect them, it has proved a very difficult matter to determine. So of the noted glandules which form Peyer's patches, their precise office, though seemingly like those of the lym- phatic glands, cannot be positively assigned, so far as I know, at the present time. It is of obvious interest to learn it with reference to the pathology of typhoid fever. It will be remarked that the coincidence of their changes in this disease with enlargement of the spleen suggests the idea of a similarity of function in these two organs. The theories of the production of animal heat, from the times of Black, Lavoisier, and Crawford to those of Liebig, are familiar to all who have paid any atten- tion to physiological studies. The simplicity of Liebig's views, and the popular form in which they have been presented, have given them wide currency, and incorpo- rated them in the common belief and language of our text-books. Direct oxidation or combustion of the carbon and hydrogen contained in the food, or in the tissues themselves ; the division of alimentary sub- stances into respiratory, or non-azotized, and azotized, — these doctrines are familiar even to the classes in our high-schools. But this simple statement is boldly ques- 40 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE tioned. Nothing proves that oxygen combines (in the system) with hydrogen and carbon in particular, rather than with sulphur and azote. Such is the well-grounded statement of Robin and Verdeil. " It is very probable that animal heat is entirely produced by the chemical actions which take place in the organism^ but the phe- nomenon is too complex to admit of our calculating it according to the quality of oxygen consumed." These last are the words of Regnault, as cited by Mr. Lewes, whose intelligent discussion of this and many of the most interesting physiological problems I strongly rec- ommend to your attention. This single illustration covers a wider ground than the special function to which it belongs. We are learn- ing that the chemistry of the body must be studied, not simply by its ingesta and egesta, but that there is a long intermediate series of changes which must be in- vestigated in their own light, under their own special conditions. The expression " sum of vital unities " applies to the chemical actions, as well as to other actions localized in special parts ; and when the dis- tinguished chemists whom I have just cited entitle their work a treatise on the immediate principles of the body, they only indicate the nature of that profound and subtile analysis which must take the place of all hasty generalizations founded on a comparison of the food with residual products. I will only call your attention to the fact, that the exceptional phenomenon of the laboratory is the pre- IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 41 vailing law of the organism. Nutrition itself is but one great catalytic process. As the blood travels its rounds, each part selects its appropriate element and transforms it to its own likeness. Whether the appropriating agent be cell or nucleus, or a structureless solid like the in- tercellular substance of cartilage, the fact of its pres- ence determines the separation of its proper constitu- ents from the circulating fluid, so that even when we are wounded bone is replaced by bone, skin by skin, and nerve by nerve. It is hardly without a smile that we resuscitate the old question of the vis insita of the muscular fibre, so famous in the discussions of Haller and his contempo- raries. Speaking generally, I think we may say that Haller's doctrine is the one now commonly received ; namely, that the muscles contract in virtue of their own inherent endowments. It is true that Kolliker says no perfectly decisive fact has been brought for- ward to prove that the striated muscles contract with- out having been acted on by nerves. Yet Mr. Bow- man's observations on the contraction of isolated fibres appear decisive enough (unless we consider them inval- idated by Dr. Lionel Beale's recent researches, tending to show that each elementary fibre is supplied with nerves *) ; and as to the smooth muscular fibres, we have Virchow's statement respecting the contractility * Proc. Koyal Society, No. XL. Vol. X., and British and Foreign Med. Chir. Review for April, 1861. 42 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE of those of the umbilical cord, where there is not a trace of any nerves.* In the investigation of the nervous system, anatomy and physiology have gone hand in hand. It is very singular that so important, and seemingly simple, a fact as the connection of the nerve-tubes, at their origin or in their course, with the nerve-cells, should have so long remained open to doubt, as you may see that it did by referring to the very complete work of Sharpey and Quain, (edition of 1849,) the histo- logical portion of which is cordially approved by Kol- liker himself.f Several most interesting points of the minute anat- omy of the nervous centres have been laboriously and skilfully worked out by a recent graduate of this Medical School, in a monograph worthy to stand in line with those of Lockhart Clarke, Stilling, and Schroder van der Kolk.J I have had the privilege of examining and of showing some of you a number of Dr. Dean's skilful preparations. I have no space to give even an abstract of his conclusions. I can * See also the results of experiments with woorara and sul.phocyanide of potassium. The first destroys the irritability of the nerves, the second that of the muscles. The student will find a notice of Bernard's experiments with these poisons in Dr. Dal ton's standard work on Physiology, which if he does not own, he should at once procure. t See also a learned note in Dr. Waldo I. Burnett's " Reviews and Ab- stracts," etc., American Journal of Science, September, 1853. J Microscopic Anatomy of the Lumbar Enlargement of the Spinal Cord. By John Dean, M. D. Cambridge. 1861. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 43 only refer to his proof of the fact, that a single cell may send its processes into several different bun- dles of nerve-roots (Fig. 7, i?), and to his demon- stration of the curved ascending and descending fibres from the posterior nerve-roots, to reach what he has called the longitudinal columns of the cornua (Fig. 8, h, K). I must also mention Dr. Dean's exquisite microscopic photographs from sections of the medulla oblongata, which appear to me to promise a new de- velopment, if not a new epoch, in anatomical art. It having been settled that the nerve-tubes can very commonly be traced directly to the nerve-cells, the object of all the observers in this department of anatomy is to follow these tubes to their origin. We have an infinite snarl of telegraph-wires, and we may be reasonably sure that, if we can follow them up, we shall find each of them ends in a battery somewhere. One of the most interesting problems is to find the ganglionic origin of the great nerves of the medulla oblongata, and this is the end to which, by the aid of the most delicate sections, colored so as to bring out their details, mounted so as to be imperishable, mag- nified by the best instruments, and now self-recorded in the light of the truth-telling sunbeam, our fellow- student is making a steady progress in a labor which I think bids fair to rank with the most valuable con- tributions to histology that we have had from this side of the Atlantic. It is interesting to see how old questions are inci- 44 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE dentally settled in the course of these new investiga- tions. Thus, Mr. Clarke's dissections, confirmed by- preparations of Mr. Dean's which I have myself ex- amined, place the fact of the decussation of the pyra- mids — denied by Haller, by Morgagni, and even by Stilling — beyond doubt. So the spinal canal, the ex- istence of which, at least in the adult, has been so often disputed, appears as a coarse and unequivocal anatomi- cal fact in many of the preparations referred to. While these studies of the structure of the cord have been going on, the ingenious and indefatigable Brown-Se*quard has been investigating the functions of its different parts with equal diligence. The mi- croscopic anatomists had shown that the ganglionic corpuscles of the gray matter of the cord are con- nected with each other by their processes, as well as with the nerve-roots. M. Brown-Se*quard has proved by numerous experiments that the gray substance transmits sensitive impressions and muscular stimula- tion. The oblique ascending and descending fibres from the posterior nerve-roots, joining the " longitudi- nal columns of the cornua," * account for the results of Brown-S6quard's sections of the posterior columns.! The physiological experimenter has also made it evi- dent that the decussation of the conductors of sensi- tive impressions has its seat in the spinal cord, and not in the encephalon, as had been supposed. Not * Dean's Memoir, Fig. 8. t Lectures, (Philadelphia, I860,) Lect. II. p. 26, and Plate I. fig. 7. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 45 less remarkable than these results are the facts, which I with others of my audience have had the opportunity of observing, as shown by M. Brown-Se'quard, of the artificial production of epilepsy in animals by injuring the spinal cord, and the induction of the paroxysm by pinching a certain portion of the skin. I would also call the student's attention to his account of the rela- tions of the nervous centres to nutrition and secre- tion, the last of which relations has been made the subject of an extended essay by our fellow-country- man, Dr. H. F. Campbell, of Georgia. The physiology of the spinal cord seems a simple matter as you study it in Longet. The experiments of Brown-Se'quard have shown the problem to be a complex one, and raised almost as many doubts as they have solved questions ; at any rate, I believe all lecturers on physiology agree that there is no part of their task they dread so much as the analysis of the evi- dence relating to the special offices of the different por- tions of the medulla spinalis. In the brain we are sure that we do not know how to localize functions ; in the spinal cord, we think we do know something ; but there are so many anomalies, and seeming contradictions, and sources of fallacy, that, beyond the facts of crossed pa- ralysis of sensation, and the conducting* agency of the gray substance, I am afraid we retain no cardinal principles discovered since the development of the reflex function took its place by Sir Charles Bell's great discovery. 46 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE By the manner in which I spoke of the brain, you will see that I am obliged to leave phrenology sub Jove, — out in the cold, — as not one of the household of science. I am not one of its haters ; on the contrary, I am grateful for the incidental good it has done. I love to amuse myself in its plaster Golgothas, and listen to the glib professor, as he discovers by his manipula- tions " All that disgraced my betters met in me." I loved of old to see square-headed, heavy-jawed Spurz- heim make a brain flower out into a corolla of marrowy filaments, as Vieussens had done before him, and to hear the dry-fibred but human-hearted George Combe teach good sense under the disguise of his equivocal system. But the pseudo-sciences, phrenology and the rest, seem to me only appeals to weak minds and the weak points of strong ones. There is a pica or false appetite in many intelligences ; they take to odd fancies in place of wholesome truth, as girls gnaw at chalk and charcoal. Phrenology juggles with nature. It is so adjusted as to soak up all evidence that helps it, and shed all that harms it. It crawls forward in all weathers, like Richard Edgeworth's hygrometer. It does not stand at the boundary of our ignorance, it seems to me, but is one of the will-o'-the-wisps of its undisputed central domain of bog and quicksand. Yet I should not have devoted so many words to it, did I not recognize the light it has thrown on human actions by its study of congenital organic tendencies. Its maps of the surface W MEDICAL SCIENCE. 47 of the head are, I feel sure, founded on a delusion, but its studies of individual character are always interesting and instructive. The " snapping-turtle " strikes after its natural fashion when it first comes out of the egg. Children betray their tendencies in their way of dealing with the breasts that nourish them ; nay, I can venture to affirm, that long before they are born they teach their mothers something of their turbulent or quiet tempers. u Castor gaudet equis, ovo prognatus eodem Pugnis." Strike out the false pretensions of phrenology ; call it anthropology ; let it study man the individual in distinc- tion from man the abstraction, the metaphysical or the- ological lay-figure ; and it becomes " the proper study of mankind," one of the noblest and most interesting of pursuits. The whole physiology of the nervous system, from the simplest manifestation of its power in an insect up to the supreme act of the human intelligence working through the brain, is fall of the most difficult yet pro- foundly interesting questions. The singular relations between electricity and nerve-force, — relations which it has been attempted to interpret as meaning identity, in the face of palpable differences, require still more extended studies. You may be interested by Professor Faraday's statement of his opinion on the matter. " Though I am not satisfied that the nervous fluid is only electricity, still I think that the agent in the 48 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE nervous system may be an inorganic force ; and if there be reason for supposing that magnetism is a higher relation of force than electricity, so it may well be imagined that the nervous power may be of a still more exalted character, and yet within the reach of experiment." In connection with this statement, it is interesting to refer to the experiments of Helmholtz on the rapidity of transmission of the nervous actions. The rate is given differently in Valentin's report of these experi- ments and in that found in the Scientific Annual for 1858. One hundred and eighty to three hundred feet per second is the rate of movement assigned for sen- sation, but all such results must be very vaguely approximative. Boxers, fencers, players at the Italian game of mora, " prestidigitators," and all who depend for their success on rapidity of motion, know what dif- ferences there are in the personal equation of move- ment. Keflex action, the mechanical sympathy, if I may so call it, of distant parts ; Instinct, which is crystallized intelligence, — an absolute law with its invariable planes and angles introduced into the sphere of conscious- ness, as raphides are enclosed in the living cells of plants ; Intellect, — the operation of the thinking prin- ciple through material organs, with an appreciable waste of tissue in every act of thought, so that our clergymen's blood has more phosphates to get rid of on Monday than on any other clay of the week; IN MEDICAL SCIENCE 49 Will, — theoretically the absolute determining power, practically limited in different degrees by the varying organization of races and individuals, annulled or per- verted by different ill-understood organic changes ; — on all these subjects our knowledge is in its infancy, and from the study of some of them the interdict of the Vatican is hardly yet removed. I must allude to one or two points in the histology and physiology of the organs of sense. The anterior continuation of the retina beyond the ora serrata has been a subject of much discussion. If H. Miiller and Kolliker can be relied upon, this question is set- tled by recognizing that a layer of cells, continued from the retina, passes over the surface of the zonula Zinnii, but that no proper nervous element is so pro- longed forward. I observe that Kolliker calls the true nervous ele- ments of the retina " the layer of gray cerebral sub- stance." In fact, the ganglionic corpuscles of each eye may be considered as constituting a little brain, connected with the masses behind by the commissure, commonly called the optic nerve. We are prepared, therefore, to find these two little brains in the most intimate relations with each other, as we find the cerebral hemispheres. We know that they are di- rectly connected by fibres that arch round through the chiasma. I mention these anatomical facts to introduce a physiological observation of my own, first announced 50 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE in one of the lectures before the Medical Class, sub- sequently communicated to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and printed in its " Transac- tions " for February 14, 1860. I refer to the appar- ent transfer of impressions from one retina to the other, to which I have given the name reflex vision. The idea was suggested to me in consequence of certain effects noticed in employing the stereoscope. Profes- sor William B. Rodgers has since called the attention of the American Scientific Association to some facts bearing on the subject, and to a very curious experi- ment of Leonardo da Vinci's, which enables the ob- server to look through the palm of his hand (or seem to), as if it had a hole bored through it. As he and others hesitated to accept my explanation, I was not sorry to find recently the following words in the " Ob- servations on Man " of that acute observer and thinker, David Hartley.* " An impression made on the right eye alone by a single object may* propagate itself into the left, and there raise up an image almost equal in vividness to itself; and consequently when we see with one eye only, we may, however, have pictures in both eyes." Hartley, in 1784, had anticipated many of the doctrines which have since been systematized into the theory of reflex actions, and with which I have attempted to associate this act of reflex vision. My sixth ex- periment, however, in the communication referred to, * Vol. I. p. 207. London, 1801. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 51 appears to me to be a crucial one, proving the cor- rectness of my explanation, and I am not aware that it has been before instituted. Another point of great interest connected with the physiology of vision, and involved for a long time in great obscurity, is that of the adjustment of the eye to different distances. Dr. Clay Wallace, of New York, who published a very ingenious little book on the eye about twenty years ago, with vignettes reminding one of Bewick, was among the first, if not the first, to de- scribe the ciliary muscle, to which the power of adjust- ment is generally ascribed. It is ascertained, by exact experiment with the phcenidoscope, that accommodation depends on change of form of the crystalline lens. Where the crystalline is wanting, as Mr. Ware long ago taught, no power of accommodation remains. The ciliary muscle is generally thought to effect the change of form of the crystalline. The power of accommoda- tion is lost after the application of atropine, in conse- quence, as is supposed, of the paralysis of this muscle. This, I believe, is the nearest approach to a demon- stration we have on this point. I have only time briefly to refer to Professor Draper's most ingenious theory as to the photographic nature of vision, for an account of which I must refer to his original and interesting Treatise on Physiology. It were to be wished that the elaborate and very interesting researches of the Marquis Corti, which have revealed such singular complexity of structure in the 52 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE cochlea of the ear, had done more to clear up its doubt- ful physiology ; but I am afraid we have nothing but hypotheses for the special part it plays in the act of hearing, and that we must say the same respecting the office of the semicircular canals. The microscope has achieved some of its greatest triumphs in teaching us the changes which occur in the development of the embryo. No more interesting dis- covery stands recorded in the voluminous literature of this subject than the one originally announced by Mar- tin Barry, afterwards discredited, and still later con- firmed by Mr. Newport and others ; namely, the fact that the fertilizing filament reaches the interior of the ovum in various animals ; — a striking parallel to the action of the pollen-tube in the vegetable. But beyond the mechanical facts all is mystery in the movements of organization, as profound as in the fall of a stone or the formation of a crystal. To the chemist and the microscopist the living body presents the same difficulties, arising from the fact that everything is in perpetual change in the organism. The fibrine of the blood puzzles the one as much as its glob- ules puzzle the other. The difference between the branches of science which deal with space only, and those which deal with space and time, is this : we have no glasses that can magnify time. The figure I here show you* was photographed from an object (pleuro- • From a very interesting paper by Professor 0. N. Rood, of Albany, containing, with other views, the first microscopic stereograph I have seen. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 53 sigma angulatum) magnified a thousand diameters, or presenting a million times its natural surface. This other figure of the same object, enlarged from the one just shown, is magnified seven thousand diameters, or forty-nine million times in surface. When we can make the forty-nine millionth of a second as long as its integer, physiology and chemistry will approach nearer the completeness of anatomy. Our reverence becomes more worthy, or, if you will, less unworthy of its Infinite Object in proportion as our intelligence is lifted and expanded to a higher and broader understanding of the Divine methods of action. If Galen called his heathen readers to admire " the power, the wisdom, the providence, the goodness of the Framer of the animal body," — if Mr. Boyle, the stu- dent of nature, as Addison and that friend of his who had known him for forty years tell us, never uttered the name of the Supreme Being without making a dis- tinct pause in his speech, in token of his devout recog- nition of its awful meaning, — surely we, who inherit the accumulated wisdom of nearly two hundred years since the time of the British philosopher, and of almost two thousand since the Greek physician, may well lift our thoughts from the works we study to their great Artificer. These wonderful discoveries which we owe to that mighty little instrument, the telescope of the inner firmament with all its included worlds ; these simple formulae by which we condense the observations 54 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE of a generation in a single axiom ; these logical analy- ses by which we fence out the ignorance we cannot re- claim, and fix the limits of our knowledge, — all lead us up to the inspiration of the Almighty, which gives under- standing to the world's great teachers. To fear science or knowledge, lest it disturb our old beliefs, is to fear the influx of the Divine wisdom into the souls of our fellow-men ; for what is science but the piecemeal revelation — uncovering — of the plan of creation, by the agency of those chosen prophets of nature whom God has illuminated from the central light of truth for that single purpose ? The studies which we have glanced at are prelim- inary in your education to the practical arts which make use of them, — the arts of healing, — surgery and medicine. The more you examine the structure of the organs and the laws of life, the more you will find how resolutely each of the cell-republics which make up the E pluribus unum of the body maintains its independence. Guard it, feed it, air it, warm it, exercise or rest it properly, and the working elements will do their best to keep well or to get well. What do we do with ailing vegetables ? Dr. Warren, my hon- ored predecessor in this chair, bought a country-place, including half of an old orchard. A few years after- wards I saw the trees on his side of the fence looking in good health, while those on the other side were scraggy and miserable. How do you suppose this IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 55 change was brought about ? By watering them with Fowler's solution ? By digging in calomel freely about their roots ? Not at all ; but by loosening the soil round them, and supplying them with the right kind of food in fitting quantities. Now a man is not a plant, or, at least, he is a very curious one, for he carries his soil in his stomach, which is a kind of portable flower-pot, and he grows round it, instead of out of it. He has, besides, a singu- larly complex nutritive apparatus and a nervous sys- tem. But recollect the doctrine already enunciated in the language of Virchow, that an animal, like a tree, is a sum of vital unities, of which the cell is the ultimate element. Every healthy cell, whether in a vegetable or an animal, necessarily performs its function properly so long as it is supplied with its proper materials and stimuli. A cell may, it is true, be congenitally defective, in which case disease is, so to speak, its normal state. But if originally sound and subsequently diseased, there has certainly been some excess, deficiency, or wrong quality in the mate- rials or stimuli applied to it. You remove this inju- rious influence and substitute a normal one ; remove the baked coal-ashes, for instance, from the roots of a tree, and replace them with loam ; take away the salt meat from the patient's table, and replace it with fresh meat and vegetables, and the cells of the tree or the man return to their duty. I do not know that we ever apply to a plant any 56 BOEDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE element which is not a natural constituent of the vegetable structure, except perhaps externally, for the accidental purpose of killing parasites. The whole art of cultivation consists in learning the proper food and conditions of plants, and supplying them. We give them water, earths, salts of various kinds such as they are made of, with a chance to help themselves to air and light. The farmer would be laughed at who undertook to manure his fields or his trees with a salt of lead or of arsenic. These elements are not constituents of healthy plants. The gardener uses the waste of the arsenic furnaces to kill the weeds in his walks. If the law of the animal cell, and of the animal organism, which is built up of such cells, is like that of the vegetable, we might expect that we should treat all morbid conditions of any of the vital unities be- longing to an animal in the same way, by increasing, diminishing, or changing its natural food or stimuli. " That is an aliment which nourishes ; whatever we find in the organism, as a constant and integral ele- ment, either forming part of its structure, or one of the conditions of vital processes, that and that only deserves the name of aliment." * I see no reason, therefore, why iron, phosphate of lime, sulphur, should not be considered food for man, as much as guano or poudrette for vegetables. Whether one or another of them is best in any given case, — whether they shall * Lewes, Physiology of Common Life, I. 76. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 57 be taken alone or in combination, in large or small quantities, — are separate questions. But they are elements belonging to the body, and even in mod- erate excess will produce little disturbance. There is no presumption against any of this class of sub- stances, any more than against water or salt, provided they are used in fitting combinations, proportions, and forms. But when it comes to substances alien to the healthy system, which never belong to it as normal constitu- ents, the case is very different. There is a presumption against putting lead or arsenic into the human body, as against putting them into plants, because they do not belong there, any more than pounded glass, which, it is said, used to be given as a poison. The same thing is true of mercury and silver. What becomes of these alien substances after they get into the system we cannot always tell. But in the case of silver, from the accident of its changing color under the influence of light, we do know what happens. It is thrown out, in part at least, under the epidermis, and there it remains to the patient's dying day. This is a strik- ing illustration of the difficulty which the system finds in dealing with non-assimilable elements, and justifies in some measure the vulgar prejudice against " min- eral poisons." I trust the youngest student on these benches will not commit the childish error of confounding a pre- sumption against a particular class of agents with a 3* 58 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE condemnation of them. Mercury, for instance, is alien to the system, and eminently disturbing in its influence. Yet its efficacy in certain forms of specific disease is acknowledged by all but the most sceptical theorists. Even the esprit rnoqueur of Ricord, the Voltaire of pelvic literature, submits to the time-honored consti- tutional authority of this great panacea in the class of cases to which he has devoted his brilliant intelligence. Still, there is no telling what evils have arisen from the abuse of this mineral. Dr. Armstrong long ago pointed out some of them, and they have become matters of common notoriety. I am pleased, therefore, when I find so able and experienced a practitioner as Dr. Wil- liams of this city proving that iritis is best treated with- out mercury,* and Dr. Vanderpool showing the same thing to be true for pericarditis. Whatever elements nature does not introduce into vegetables, the natural food of all animal life, — directly of herbivorous, indirectly of carnivorous animals, — are to be regarded with suspicion. Arsenic-eating may seem to improve the condition of horses for a time, — and even of human beings, if Tschudi's stories can bo trusted, — but it soon appears that its alien qualities are at war with the animal organization. So of copper, an- timony, and other non-alimentary simple substances ; every one of them is an intruder in the living system, as much as a constable would be, quartered in our household. This does not mean that they may not, * On the Treatment of Iritis without Mercury, Boston, 1856. LN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 59 any of them, be called in for a special need, as we send for the constable when we have good reason to think we have a thief under our roof; but a man's body is his castle, as well as his house, and the presumption is that we are to keep our alimentary doors bolted against these perturbing agents. Now the feeling is very apt to be just contrary to this. The habit has been very general with well-taught prac- titioners, to have recourse to the introduction of these alien elements into the system on the occasion of any slight disturbance. The tongue was a little coated, and mercury must be given ; the skin was a little dry, and the patient must take antimony. It was like send- ing for the constable and the posse comitatus when there is only a carpet to shake or a refuse-barrel to empty.* The constitution bears slow poisoning a great deal better than might be expected ; yet the most intel- ligent men in the profession have gradually got out of the habit of prescribing these powerful alien substances in the old routine way. Mr. Metcalf will tell you how much more sparingly they are given by our- practitioners at the present time, than when he first inaugurated the new era of pharmacy among us. Still, the presumption in favor of poisoning out every spontaneous reaction of outraged nature is not extinct in those who are trusted * Dr. James Johnson advises persons not ailing to take five grains of blue pill with one or two of aloes twice a week for three or four months in the year, with half a pint of compound decoction of sarsaparilla every day for the same period, to preserve health a,nd prolong life. Pract. Treatise on Dis. of Liver, etc., p. 272. 60 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE with the lives of their fellow-citizens. " On examining the file of prescriptions at the hospital, I discovered that they were rudely written, and indicated a treat- ment, as they consisted chiefly of tartar emetic, ipe- cacuanha, and epsom salts, hardly favorable to the cure of the prevailing diarrhoea and dysenteries." * In a report of a poisoning case now on trial, where we are told that arsenic enough was found in the stomach to produce death in twenty-four hours, the patient is said to have been treated by arsenic, phosphorus, bryonia, aconite, nux vomica, and muriatic acid, — by a prac- titioner of what school may be imagined. The traditional idea of always poisoning out disease, as we smoke out vermin, is now seeking its last refuge behind the wooden cannon and painted port-holes of that unblushing system of false scientific pretences which I do not care to name in a discourse addressed to an audience devoted to the study of the laws of nature in the light of the laws of evidence. It is ex- traordinary to observe that the system which, by its reducing medicine to a name and a farce, has accus- tomed all who have sense enough to see through its thin artifices to the idea that diseases get well with- out being " cured," should now be the main support of the tottering poison-cure doctrine. It has unques- tionably helped to teach wise people that nature heals most diseases without help from pharmaceutic art, but * United States Sanitary Commission, Document No. 25. Report on a Regiment near Washington, dated July 9th, 1861. W MEDICAL SCIENCE. 61 it continues to persuade fools that art can arrest them all with its specifics. It is worse than useless to attempt in any way to check the freest expression of opinion as to the effi- cacy of any or all of the " heroic " means of treatment employed by practitioners of different schools and pe- riods. Medical experience is a great thing, but we must not forget that there is a higher experience, which tries its results in a court of a still larger jurisdiction ; that, namely, in which the laws of human belief are summoned to the witness-box, and obliged to testify to the sources of error which beset the medical practi- tioner. The verdict is as old as the father of medicine, who announces it in the words, "judgment is difficult." Physicians differed so in his time, that some denied that there was any such thing as an art of medicine. One man's best remedies were held as mischievous by another. The art of healing was like soothsaying, so the common people said ; the same bird was lucky or unlucky, according as he flew to the right or left.* The practice of medicine has undergone great chan- ges within the period of my own observation. Vene- section, for instance, has so far gone out of fashion, that, as I am told by residents of the New York Bellevue and the Massachusetts General Hospitals, it is almost obsolete in these institutions, at least in medical practice.f The old Brunonian stimulating * ETepi Aiairrjs 'O^cW, § IV. v. t A similar change has taken place also in English surgical practice. Sir W. Napier speaks of " that inveterate use of the lancet, which dis- 62 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE treatment has come into vogue again in the practice of Dr. Todd and his followers. The compounds of mercury have yielded their place as drugs of all work, and specifics for that very frequent subjective complaint, nescio quid faciam — to compounds of io- dine.* Opium is believed in, and quinine, and "rum," using that expressive monosyllable to mean all alco- holic cordials. If MoliSre were writing now, instead of saignare, purgare, and the other, he would be more like to say, Stimulare^ opium dare et potassio-iodizare. I have been in relation successively with the Eng- lish and American evacuant and alterative practice, in which calomel and antimony figured so largely that, as you may see in Dr. Jackson's last " Letter," Dr. Holyoke, a good representative of sterling old-fash- ioned medical art, counted them with opium and Pe- ruvian bark as his chief remedies ; with the moderately expectant practice of Louis ; the blood-letting " coup mr coup " of Bouillaud ; the contra-stimulant method of Rasori and his followers ; the anti-irritant system of Broussais, with its leeching and gum- water ; I have heard from our own students of the simple opium practice of the renowned German teacher, Oppolzer ; and now I find the medical community brought round by the revolving cycle of opinion to that same old graced the surgery of the times," — the early years of this century. Life and Opinions of Sir Charles James Napier, (London, 1857,) Vol. I. p. 153. * Sir Astley Cooper has the boldness — or honesty — to speak of medi- cines which " are given as much to assist the medical man as his patient." Lectures, (London, 1832,) p. 14. m MEDICAL SCIENCE. bd plan of treatment which John Brown taught in Edin- burgh in the last quarter of the last century, and Miner and Tully fiercely advocated among ourselves in the early years of the present. The worthy physi- cians last mentioned, and their antagonist, Dr. Gallup, used stronger language than we of these degenerate days permit ourselves. " The lancet is a weapon which annually slays more than the sword," says Dr. Tully. " It is probable that, for forty years past, opium and its preparations have done seven times the injury they have rendered benefit, on the great scale of the world," says Dr. Gallup. What is the meaning of these perpetual changes and conflicts of medical opinion and practice, from an early antiquity to our own time ? Simply this : all " methods " of treatment end in disappointment of those extravagant expectations which men are wont to entertain of medical art. The bills of mortality are more obviously affected by drainage, than by this or that method of practice. The insurance compa- nies do not commonly charge a different percentage on the lives of the patients of this or that physician. In the course of a generation, more or less, physicians themselves are liable to get tired of a practice which has so little effect upon the average movement of vital decomposition. Then they are ready for a change, even if it were back again to a method which has already been tried, and found wanting. Our practitioners, or many of them, have got back to 64 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE the ways of old Dr. Samuel Danforth, who, as it is well known, had strong objections to the use of the lancet. By and by a new reputation will be made by some dis- contented practitioner, who, tired of seeing patients die with their skins full of whiskey and their brains muddy with opium, returns to a bold antiphlogistic treatment, and has the luck to see a few patients of note get well under it. So of the remedies which have gone out of fashion and been superseded by others. It can hardly be doubted that they will come into vogue again, more or less extensively, under the influence of that irre- sistible demand for change just referred to. Then will come the usual talk about a change in the character of disease, which has about as much meaning as that concerning " old-fashioned snow- storms." " Epidemic constitutions " of disease mean something, no doubt ; a great deal as applied to mala- rious affections ; but that the whole type of diseases undergoes such changes that the practice must be reversed from depleting to stimulating, and vice versa, is much less likely than that methods of treatment go out of fashion and come in again. If there is any disease which claims its percentage with reasonable uniformity, it is phthisis. Yet I remember that the reverend and venerable Dr. Prince, of Salem, told me one Commencement day, as I was jogging along to- wards Cambridge with him, that he recollected the time when that disease was hardly known; and in confirmation of his statement mentioned a case in IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 65 which it was told as a great event, that somebody down on " the Cape " had died of " a consumption." This story does not sound probable to myself, as I repeat it, yet I assure you it is true, and it shows how cautiously we must receive all popular stories of great changes in the habits of disease.* Is there no progress, then, but do we return to the same beliefs and practices which our forefathers wore out and threw away ? I trust and believe that there is a real progress. We may, for instance, return in a measure to the Brunonian stimulating system, but it must be in a modified way, for we cannot go back to the simple Brunonian pathology, since we have learned too much of diseased action to accept its con- venient dualism. So of other doctrines, each new Avatar strips them of some of their old pretensions, until they take their fitting place at last, if they have any truth in them, or disappear, if they were mere phantasms of the imagination. In the mean time, while medical theories are com- ing in and going out, there is a set of sensible men who are never run away with by them, but practise their art sagaciously and faithfully in much the same way from generation to generation. From the time of Hippocrates to that of our own medical patriarch, there has been an apostolic succession of wise and good practitioners. If you will look at the first aphorism * See Brit, and For. Med.-Chir. Rev. for Oct., 1860, p. 239. The last two paragraphs were in type before I had seen the article here referred to. 66 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE of the ancient Master, you will see that before all rem- edies he places the proper conduct of the patient and his attendants, and the fit ordering of all the condi- tions surrounding him. The class of practitioners I have referred to have always been the most faithful in attending to these points. No doubt they have some- times prescribed unwisely, in compliance with the prejudices of their time, but they have grown wiser as they have grown older, and learned to trust more in nature and less in their plans of interference. I believe common opinion confirms Sir James Clark's observation to this effect. The experience of the profession must, I think, run parallel with that of the wisest of its individual mem- bers. Each time a plan of treatment or a particular remedy comes up for trial, it is submitted to a sharper scrutiny. When Cullen wrote his Materia Medica, he had seriously to assail the practice of giving burnt toad, which was still countenanced by at least one medical authority of note. I have read recently in some medical journal, that an American practitioner, whose name is known to the country, is prescribing the hoof of a horse for epilepsy. It was doubtless sug- gested by that old fancy of wearing a portion of elk's- hoof hung round the neck or in a ring, for this dis- ease. But it is hard to persuade reasonable people to swallow the abominations of a former period. The evidence which satisfied Fernelius will not serve one of our hospital physicians. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 67 In this way those articles of the Materia Medica which had nothing but loathsomeness to recommend them have been gradually dropped, and are not like to obtain any general favor again with civilized com- munities. The next culprits to be tried are the poi- sons. I have never been in the least sceptical as to the utility of some of them, when properly employed. Though I believe that at present, taking the world at large, and leaving out a few powerful agents of such immense value that they rank next to food in impor- tance, the poisons prescribed for disease do more hurt than good, I have no doubt, and never professed to have any, that they do much good in prudent and instructed hands. But I am very willing to confess a great jeal- ousy of many agents, and I could almost wish to see the Materia Medica so classed as to call suspicion upon certain ones among them. Thus the alien elements^ those which do not properly enter into the composition of any living tissue, are the most to be suspected, — mercury, lead, antimony, silver, and the rest, for the reasons I have before mentioned. Even iodine, which, as it is found in certain plants, seems less remote from the animal tissues, gives une- quivocal proofs from time to time that it is hostile to some portions of the glandular system. There is, of course, less prima facie objection to those agents which consist of assimilable elements, such as are found making- a part of healthy tissues. These are divisible into three classes, — foods, poisons, 68 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE and inert, mostly because insoluble, substances. The food of one animal or of one human being is some- times poison to another, and vice versa; inert sub- stances may act mechanically, so as to produce the effect of poisons ; but this division holds exactly enough for our purpose. Strictly speaking, every poison consisting of assimi- lable elements may be considered as unwholesome food. It is rejected by the stomach, or it produces diarrhoea, or it causes vertigo or disturbance of the heart's ac- tion, or some other symptom for which the subject of it would consult the physician, if it came on from any other cause than taking it under the name of medicine. Yet portions of this unwholesome food which we call medicine, we have reason to believe, are assimilated ; thus, castor-oil appears to be par- tially digested by infants, so that they require large doses to affect them medicinally. Even that deadliest of poisons, hydrocyanic acid, is probably assimilated, and helps to make living tissue, if it do not kill the patient, for the assimilable elements which it contains, given in the separate forms of amygdalin and emulsin, produce no disturbance, unless, as in Bernard's ex- periments, they are suffered to meet in the digestive organs. A medicine consisting of assimilable sub- stances being then simply unwholesome food, we un- derstand what is meant by those cumulative effects of such remedies often observed, as in the case of digi- talis and strychnia. They are precisely similar to the IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 69 cumulative effects of a salt diet in producing scurvy, or of spurred rye in producing dry gangrene. As the effects of such substances are a violence to the organs, we should exercise the same caution with re- gard to their use that we would exercise about any other kind of poisonous food, — -partridges at certain seasons, for instance. Even where these poisonous kinds of food seem to be useful, we should still regard them with great jealousy. Digitalis lowers the pulse in febrile conditions. Veratrum viride does the same thing. How do we know that a rapid pulse is not a normal adjustment of nature to the condition it accom- panies? Digitalis has gone out of favor; how sure are we that Veratrum viride will not be found to do more harm than good in a case of internal inflammation, taking the whole course of the disease into considera- tion? Think of the change of opinion with regard to the use of opium in delirium tremens, (which you remember is sometimes called delirium vigilans^) where it seemed so obviously indicated, since the publica- tion of Dr. Ware's admirable essay. I respect the evidence of my contemporaries, but I cannot forget the sayings of the Father of medicine, — Ars longa, judicium difficile. I am not presuming to express an opinion concern- ing Veratrum viride, which was little heard of when I was still practising medicine. I am only appealing to that higher court of experience which sits in judg- 70 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE ment on all decisions of the lower medical tribunals, and which requires more than one generation for its final verdict. Once change the habit of mind so long prevalent among practitioners of medicine ; once let it be every- where understood that the presumption is in favor of food, and hot of alien substances, of innocuous, and not of unwholesome food, for the sick ; that this presump- tion requires very strong evidence in each particular case to overcome it ; but that, when such evidence is afforded, the alien substance or the unwholesome food should be given boldly, in sufficient quantities, in the same spirit as that with which the surgeon lifts his knife against a patient, — that is, with the same reluc- tance and the same determination, — and I think we shall have and hear much less of charlatanism in and out of the profession. The disgrace of medicine has been that colossal system of self-deception, in obedience to which mines have been emptied of their cankering minerals, the vegetable kingdom robbed of all its noxious growths, the entrails of animals taxed for their impurities, the poison-bags of reptiles drained of their venom, and all the inconceivable abominations thus obtained thrust down the throats of human beings suffering from some fault of organization, nourishment, or vital stimulation. Much as we have gained, we have not yet thor- oughly shaken off the notion that poison is the natural IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 71 food of disease, as wholesome aliment is the support of health. Cowper's lines, in The Task, show the matter-of-course practice of his time : — " He does not scorn it, who has long endured A fever's agonies, and/ecZ on drugs." Dr. Kimball, of Lowell, who has been in the habit of seeing a great deal more of typhoid fever than most practitioners, and whose surgical exploits show him not to be wanting in boldness or enterprise, can tell you whether he finds it necessary to feed his patients on drugs or not. His experience is, I believe, that of the most enlightened and advanced portion of the profession; yet I think that even in typhoid fever, and certainly in many other complaints, the effects of ancient habits and prejudices may still be seen in the practice of some educated physicians. To you, young men, it belongs to judge all that has gone before you. You come nearer to the great fathers of modern medicine than some of you imagine. Three of my own instructors attended Dr. Rush's Lectures. The illustrious Haller mentions Rush's in- augural thesis * in his Bibliotheca Anatomica ; and this same Haller, brought so close to us, tells us he remembers Ruysch, then an old man, and used to carry letters between him and Boerhaave.f Look through the history of medicine from Boerhaave to * De Coctione Ciborum in Venlriculo. Edinb. 1768. — Bibl. Anat. II. 657. f " Saepissime bonum senem vidi, ssepe Boerha avium inter et ipsum literarum vector." Ibid., I. 529. 72 BOEDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE this present day. You will see at once that medical doctrine and practice have undergone a long series of changes. You will see that the doctrine and practice of our own time must probably change in their turn, and that, if we can trust at all to the indications of their course, it will be in the direction of an improved hygiene and a simplified treatment. Especially will the old habit of violating the instincts of the sick give place to a judicious study of these same instincts. It will be found that bodily, like mental insanity, is best man- aged, for the most part, by natural soothing agencies. Two centuries ago there was a prescription for scurvy containing " stercoris taurini et anserini par quantitas trium magnarum nucum" of the hell-broth containing which "quoties-eumque sitit ceger, large bibit." * When I have recalled the humane common-sense of Captain Cook in the matter of preventing this disease ; when I have heard my friend, Mr. Dana, describing the avidity with which the scurvy-stricken sailors snuffed up the earthy fragrance of fresh raw potatoes, the food which was to supply the elements wanting to their spongy tissues, — I have recognized that the perfection of art is often a return to nature, and seen in this single instance the germ of innumerable beneficent future medical reforms. I cannot help believing that medical curative treat- ment will by and by resolve itself in great measure into modifications of the food, swallowed and breathed, * Schenck, Observ. Med. Rev., (Lugdnni, 1643,) p. 800. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 73 and of the natural stimuli, and that less will be ex- pected from specifics and noxious disturbing agents, either alien or assimilable. The noted mineral-waters containing iron, sulphur, carbonic acid, supply nutri- tious or stimulating materials to the body as much as phosphate of lime and ammoniacal compounds do to the cereal plants. The effects of a milk and vegetable diet, of gluten bread in diabetes, of cod-liver oil in phthisis, even of such audacious innovations as the water-cure and the grape-cure, are only hints of what will be accomplished when we have learned to discover what organic elements are deficient or in excess in a case of chronic disease, and the best way of correcting the abnormal condition, just as an agriculturist ascer- tains the wants of his crops and modifies the composi- tion of his soil. In acute febrile diseases we have long ago discovered that far above all drug-medication is the use of mild liquid diet in the period of excite- ment, and of stimulant and nutritious food in that of exhaustion. Hippocrates himself was as particular about his barley-ptisan as any Florence Nightingale of our time could be. The generation to which you, who are just enter- ing the profession, belong, will make a vast stride for- ward, as I believe, in the direction of treatment by natural rather than violent agencies. What is it that makes the reputation of Sydenham, as the chief of English physicians ? His prescriptions consisted prin- cipally of simples. An aperient or an opiate, a " car- 4 74 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE diac " or a tonic, may be commonly found in the midst of a somewhat fantastic miscellany of garden herbs. It was not by his pharmaceutic prescriptions that he gained his great name. It was by daring to order fresh air for small-pox patients, and riding on horse- bach for consumptives, in place of the smothering sys- tem, and the noxious and often loathsome rubbish of the established schools. Of course Sydenham was much abused by his contemporaries, as he frequently takes occasion to remind his reader. " I must needs conclude," he says, " either that I am void of merit, or that the candid and ingenuous part of mankind, who are formed with so excellent a temper of mind as to be no strangers to gratitude, make a very small part of the whole." * If in the fearless pursuit of truth you should find the world as ungracious in the nine- teenth century as he found it in the seventeenth, you may learn a lesson of self-reliance from another utter- ance of the same illustrious physician: "'Tis none of my business to inquire what other persons think, but to establish my own observations ; in order to which, I ask no favor of the reader but to peruse my writings with temper." f The physician has 'learned a great deal from the surgeon, who is naturally in advance of him, because he has a better opportunity of seeing the effects of * Of the Small-Pox and Hysteric Diseases. Epistle to Dr. William Cole, § 140, Swan's Translation, t Works, Preface, p. xxi. IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 75 his remedies. Let me shorten one of Ambroise Parens stories for you. There had been a great victory at the pass of Susa, and they were riding into the city. The wounded cried out as the horses trampled them under their hoofs, which caused good Ambroise great pity, and made him wish himself back in Paris. Going into a stable he saw four dead soldiers, and three desper- ately wounded, placed with their backs against the wall. An old campaigner came up. — " Can these fel- lows get well ? " he said. " No ! " answered the sur- geon. Thereupon, the old soldier walked up to them and cut all their throats, sweetly, and without wrath (doulcement et sans cholere). Ambroise told him he was a bad man to do such a thing. " I hope to God," he said, " somebody will do as much for me if I ever get into such a scrape " (accoustre de telle fagoti). " I was not much salted in those days " (lien doux de seZ), says Ambroise, " and little acquainted with the treatment of wounds." However, as he tells us, he proceeded to apply boiling oil of Sambuc (elder) after the approved fashion of the time, — with what torture to the patient may be guessed. At last his precious oil gave out,, and he used instead an insignificant mixture of his own contrivance. He could not sleep that night for fear his patients who had not been scalded with the boiling oil would be poisoned by the gunpowder conveyed into their wounds by the balls. To his surprise, he found them much better than the others the next morning, and resolved never 76 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE again to burn his patients with hot oil for gun-shot wounds.* This was the beginning, as nearly as we can fix it, of that reform which has introduced plain water-dress- ings in the place of the farrago of external applications which had been a source of profit to apothecaries and disgrace to art from, and before, the time when Pliny complained of them. A young surgeon who was at Sudley Church, laboring among the wounded of Bull- Run, tells me they had nothing but water for dressing, and he (being also doux de sel) was astonished to see how well the wounds did under that simple treat- ment. Let me here mention a fact or two which may be of use to some of you who mean to enter the public ser- vice. You will, as it seems, have gun-shot wounds almost exclusively to deal with. Three different sur- geons, the one just mentioned and two who saw the wounded of Big Bethel, assured me that they found no sabre-cuts or bayonet-wounds. It is the rifle-bullet from a safe distance which pierces the breasts of our soldiers, and not the gallant charge of broad platoons and sweeping squadrons, such as we have been in the habit of considering the chosen mode of warfare of ancient and modern chivalry.f * Le Voyage de Thurin, (Euvres, (Paris, 1579,) p. 1198. t Sir Charles James Napier had the same experience in Virginia in 1813. " Potomac. We have nasty sort of fighting here, amongst creeks and bushes, and lose men without show." " Yankee never shows himself, he keeps in the thickest wood, fires and runs off"." " These five thousand IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 77 Another fact parallels the story of the old cam- paigner, and may teach some of you caution in se- lecting your assistants. A chaplain told it to two of our officers personally known to myself. He over- heard the examination of a man who wished to drive one of the " avalanche " wagons, as they call them. The man was asked if he knew how to deal with wounded men. " O yes," he answered ; " if they 're hit here" pointing to the abdomen, " knock 'em on the head, — they can't get well." In art and outside of it you will meet the same bar- barisms that Ambroise Pare* met with, — for men differ less from century to century than we are apt to sup- pose ; you will encounter the same opposition, if you attack any prevailing opinion, that Sydenham com- plained of. So far as possible, let not such experien- ces breed in you a contempt for those who are the subjects of folly or prejudice, or foster any love of dis- pute for its own sake. Should you become authors, express your opinions freely ; defend them rarely. It is not often that an opinion is worth expressing, which cannot take care of itself. Opposition is the best mordant to fix the color of your thought in the gen- eral belief. in the open field might be attacked, but behind works it would be throw- ing away lives." He calls it " an inglorious warfare," — says one of the leaders is " a little deficient in gumption," — but " still my opinion is, that if we tuck up our sleeves and lay our ears back we might thrash them ; that is, if we caught them out of their trees, so as to slap at them with the bayonet." — Life, etc., Vol. I. p. 218, et $eq. 78 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE It is time to bring these crowded remarks to a close. The day has been when at the beginning of a course of Lectures I should have thought it fitting to exhort you to diligence and entire devotion to your tasks as students. It is not so now. The young man who has not heard the clarion-voices of honor and of duty now- sounding throughout the land, will heed no word of mine. In the camp or the city, in the field or the hospital, under sheltering roof, or half-protecting can- vas, or open sky, shedding our own blood or stanching that of our wounded defenders, students or teachers, — whatever our calling and our ability, we belong, not to ourselves, but to our imperilled country, whose danger is our calamity, whose ruin would be our enslavement, whose rescue shall be our earthly salvation ! You cannot all follow the armies of your country to the field. But remember that he who labors for the general good at home is an ununiformed soldier in the same holy cause with those who bear arms or minister at the side of the ambulance and in the camp hospital. Larrey claimed no precedence of Dupuytren, nor Guthrie of Sir Astley Cooper. As for the nobleness of the task for which you are preparing yourselves, I do not know that I can speak of it more strongly in prose than I did in the peaceful times before these days of trial, in the form of verse, and I will so far trespass on your time and patience as to close this Lecture by reading you IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. 79 THE TWO AEMIES. As Life's unending column pours, Two marshalled hosts are seen, — Two armies on the trampled shores That Death flows black between. One marches to the drum-beat's roll, The wide-mouthed clarion's bray, And bears upon a crimson scroll, " Our glory is to slay." One moves in silence by tne stream, With sad, yet watchful eyes, Calm as the patient planet's gleam That walks the clouded skies. Along its front no sabres shine, No blood-red pennons wave ; Its banner bears the single line, " Our duty is to save." For those no death-bed's lingering shade ; At Honor's trumpet-call, With knitted brow and lifted blade In Glory's arms they fall. For these no clashing falchions bright, No stirring battle-cry ; The bloodless stabber calls by night, — Each answers, " Here ami!" 80 BORDER LINES OF KNOWLEDGE IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. For those the sculptor's laurelled bust, The builder's marble piles, The anthems pealing o'er their dust Through long cathedral aisles. For these the blossom-sprinkled turf That floods the lonely graves, When Spring rolls in her sea-green surf In flowery-foaming waves. Two paths lead upward from below, And angels wait above, Who count each burning life-drop's flow, Each falling tear of Love. Though from the Hero's bleeding breast Her pulses Freedom drew, Though the white lilies in her crest Sprang from that scarlet dew, — While "Valor's haughty champions wait Till all their scars are shown, Love walks unchallenged through the gate, To sit beside the Throne ! Cambridge : Stereotyped and Printed by Welch, Bigelow, & Co. 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED msb °°OT the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. JAN 5 1959 De1.'58** BPR-9T95& .952 - AUG_3jJi£4 LD 21-50m-8,'57 (,C8481sl0)476 General Library , University of California Berkeley LOGY 615817 P10L UBRA«¥ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY