XLD 
 
 /3BP!3K3i 
 
 NRLF 
 
 o 
 
 o 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. 
 
 FROM THE LIBRARY OF 
 
 BENJAMIN PARKE AVERY. 
 
 GIFT OF MRS. AVERY, 
 
 August, 1896. 
 
 Accessions No. h^>(ptL ^~ Class No. 
 
\M* 
 
 
 
THE WONDERS OF ENGRAVING. 
 
mm*-{~ Qhucfimo c cr r 
 
 Autotype. 
 
 SAINT CHRISTOPHER. 
 
 />w// the early Woodcut in the possession of Earl Spencer. 
 Frontispiece.] 
 
THE 
 
 W N D E B S 
 
 OF 
 
 ENGEAVING 
 
 GEORGES DUPLESSIS. 
 
 ILLUSTRATED WITH TEN REPRODUCTIONS IN AUTOTYPE ; 
 
 AND THIRTY-FOUR WOOD-ENGRAVINGS, 
 
 BY P. SELLIER. 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 SAMPSON LOW, SON, AND MARSTON, 
 
 CROWN BUILDINGS, 188, FLEET STREET. 
 
 1871. 
 

THE 
 
 W O N D E E S 
 
 OF 
 
 ENGEAVING 
 
 GEORGES DUPLESSIS. 
 
 ILLUSTRATED WITH TEN REPRODUCTIONS IN AUTOTYPE 
 AND THIRTY-FOUR WOOD-ENGRAVINGS, 
 BY P. SELLIER. 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 SAMPSON LOW, SON, AND MARSTON, 
 
 CROWN BUILDINGS, 188, FLEET STREET. 
 
 1871. 
 
PRINTED BY WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, 
 STAMFOBD STREET AND CHARING CROSS. 
 
NOTE. 
 
 The present volume is a translation of Les Mer- 
 veilles de la Gravure, by M. GEORGES DUPLESSIS, 
 which has already appeared in the well-known 
 Series now in course of publication by Messrs. 
 L. Hachette et Cie. 
 
 The author has made Engraving and Engravers 
 his special study ; his chapters on the Italian, 
 Flemish, German, and French schools will, we 
 think, be considered exhaustive ; and nothing can 
 be clearer than his account of the processes em- 
 ployed : but he has scarcely done justice to this 
 country many of our most illustrious names are 
 unnoticed, whilst others are brought into undue 
 prominence. This omission may, we hope, be 
 rectified by the publication of a separate volume 
 on English Engravers, which is evidently much 
 needed. 
 
 The translator need only add an earnest hope 
 that the present version of Les Merveilles de la 
 Grav^^,re may be acceptable to all lovers of this 
 important and deeply interesting branch of Art. 
 
 N. R. E. M. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 THE ORIGIN OF ENGRAVING . i 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN ITALY. Engravers on Wood Nielli- 
 Copperplate Engraving at Florence, in the Northern 
 Cities, at Milan, Parma, Bologna, and Rome . . 5 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN SPAIN. Giuseppe Ribera and Francesco 
 
 Goya 74 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN THE Low COUNTRIES. Engravers on 
 Wood in the i$th Century Early Engravers on 
 Metal Holland : Rembrandt, Ruysdael, and Paul 
 Potter Belgium : Rubens, Bolswert, Paul Pontius, 
 and Anthony Vandyck 82 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN GERMANY. Early Engravers on Wood 
 Maximilian's Engravers Engraving on Metal The 
 Master of 1466, Martin Schongauer and Albert Diirer 138 
 
viii CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 ENGRAVING IN ENGLAND. Engraving on Wood W. 
 Caxton The Influence of Foreign Masters on English 
 Art Its Originality in the Eighteenth Century, and 
 its Influence on our Age . . . . . .182 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN FRANCE. Engravers on Wood En- 
 gravers on Metal The School of Fontainebleau 
 Portrait-painters Nicolas Poussin and Jean Pesne 
 Charles Lebrun and Gdrard Audran The School of 
 Watteau Vignette Engravers The School of David 207 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 PROCESSES. Engraving on Wood, Camaieu Copper- 
 plate Engraving Line Engraving, Etching, Dry 
 Point, Combination of Etching and Line Engraving, 
 Mezzotint, Aquatint, Chalk style, Engraving in Colour, 
 Physionotracy, Heliography or Photography Printing 308 
 
 INDEX OF ENGRAVERS' NAMES 331 
 
ILLUSTRATIONS. 
 
 *SAINT CHRISTOPHER . . . From the early Wood- 
 cut (Frontispiece]. 
 
 "CORONATION OF THE VIRGIN . Maso Finiguerra . 10 
 
 SAINT SEBASTIAN .... Niello . . .11 
 
 SIBYL AGRIPPINA .... Botticelli . . 18 
 
 VIRGIN AND CHILD . . . Mantegna . . 27 
 
 A YOUTH Campagnola . . 33 
 
 LUCRETIA Raimondi . . 57 
 
 A POET Ribera ... 75 
 
 THE CONDEMNED .... Goya ... 79 
 
 *ECCE HOMO L. van Leyden . 88 
 
 THE UYLENSPIEGEL ... 90 
 
 *JAN SYLVIUS Rembrandt . . 94 
 
 A LANDSCAPE .... 97 
 
 Two Cows Paul Potter . .103 
 
 *SHEEP AND GOATS . . . K. du Jardin . . 105 
 
 A CORNFIELD .... Ruysdael . . 107 
 
 COSTUME Goltzius . .113 
 
 SAINT CATHERINE .... Rubens . . .125 
 
 PORTRAIT OF SNYDERS . . . Vandyck. . .133 
 
 DANCE OF DEATH (after Holbein} H. Lutzelburger . 147 
 
 SAMSON AND THE LION . . Master 0/1466 . 149 
 
 *FLIGHT INTO EGYPT . M. Schongauer . 152 
 
 THE INFANT JESUS ... . . 154 
 
ILL USTRA TIONS. 
 
 
 
 TAGS 
 
 *SAINT JEROME 
 
 . Albert Dilrer 
 
 1 60 
 
 VIRGIN AND INFANT JESUS . 
 
 
 
 I6 3 
 
 GERMAN COSTUME . 
 
 . Aldegrever . 
 
 171 
 
 A LADY OF BALE . 
 
 . W. Hollar . 
 
 176 
 
 *THE ROYAL EXCHANGE 
 
 
 
 177 
 
 PORTRAIT OF R. BAYFEILD . 
 
 IV. Faithorne 
 
 I8 7 
 
 MARRIAGE A LA MODE . 
 
 . W. Hogarth . 
 
 201 
 
 HENRI II 
 
 . Geoffroy Tory. 
 
 215 
 
 HEAD OF CHRIST . 
 
 Claude Mellan 
 
 239 
 
 CLAUDE DERUET . 
 
 . Jacques C allot 
 
 247 
 
 SUNRISE 
 
 . Claude Lorraine 
 
 251 
 
 TIME DISCLOSING TRUTH 
 
 . G. Audran, after 
 
 
 
 Nicolas Poussin 
 
 260 
 
 ARABESQUE ORNAMENT 
 
 . J. Lepautre . 
 
 280 
 
 A "COSTUME .... 
 
 . A. Watteau . 
 
 283 
 
 STUDIO OF A COPPER -PLATE 
 
 ENGRAVER Abraham Bosse . 313 
 
 THE MOUNTEBANK . . . Rembrandt . .316 
 
 VANITY J.Callot. . .317 
 
 A PORTRAIT Prince Rupert . 320 
 
 COPPER-PLATE ENGRAVING . . A. Bosse . . 327 
 
 * These Illustrations are reproduced by the Autotype process, 
 and printed by Messrs. CUNDALL and FLEMING under license 
 from the Autotype Company, Limited. 
 
WONDERS OF ENGRAVING. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE ORIGIN OF ENGRAVING. 
 
 EFORE reviewing the various schools of En- 
 graving, and studying the growth of this art 
 in each separate country, it seems expedient to us 
 to recapitulate in a few words, the very diverse and 
 often contradictory opinions put forth concerning 
 its origin. By doing this, we shall avoid unneces- 
 sary repetition, and, without occupying ourselves 
 unduly with the purely archaeological question, we 
 can ascertain the characteristics of each school, ex- 
 amine the works worthy of attention executed in each 
 country, and enumerate the artists whom future gene- 
 rations will remember and judge. We must not 
 forget to say that we intend to occupy ourselves 
 solely with that kind of Engraving from which 
 impressions are taken ; and, purposely neglecting 
 ancient engraving, we commence our work only at 
 
 E 
 
2 . WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 the period when, Printing having been discovered, 
 Engraving became a new art and produced important 
 results. 
 
 Let us bear in mind, to begin with, that there 
 are two processes, very different in their execution, 
 although similar enough in their results engraving 
 on metal and engraving on wood ; in the first, all that 
 is to be impressed on the paper is cut in sunken lines 
 on the metal ; the second involves work of a diametri- 
 cally opposite kind ; all that is to appear in the proof 
 must be raised on the wood, and the graver must 
 carefully remove all those parts which the printer's 
 press is not to touch. 
 
 Whole volumes might be written if we wished to 
 discuss or even to review the opinions put forth by 
 scholars on the origin of engraving. Every country 
 has taken part in the discussion, and eminent men on 
 all sides have become the champions, each of his own 
 country. National pride has often interfered in the 
 dispute, and it would have run the risk of becoming 
 bitter had it descended to the arena of personalities 
 instead of remaining in the hands of earnest workers. 
 
 The French have the greater facility for discussing 
 the various opinions on this matter, inasmuch as they 
 have no claim to be considered its inventors. France 
 has indeed put forth some pretensions on this matter, 
 and has been willing to consider one Bernard Milnet 
 (an artist whose very name is more than problema- 
 tical) the most ancient engraver ; but, after a careful 
 
THE ORIGIN OF ENGRA VING. 3 
 
 investigation, this opinion is now abandoned by all, 
 even by those who first adopted it. 
 
 It is not the same with our neighbours : for a long 
 time the 'St. Christopher' of 1423 was thought the 
 most ancient known example of engraving. But 
 lately a discovery by the Baron of Reiffenberg, over- 
 threw this opinion ; and the engraving of 1418, which 
 he obtained for the Museum of Brussels (the date of 
 which appears to us incontestable), transported the 
 real period of the invention five years backward. In 
 our day, thanks to two plates printed on the leaves 
 of a manuscript which M. Henri Delaborde has 
 described and commented on* with remarkable clear- 
 ness, we know, that in 1406, the art of wood-engrav- 
 ing must have existed and the printing-press been 
 brought into use. 
 
 The history of copper-plate engraving, properly so 
 called, has passed through the same vicissitudes. 
 Before the Abbe Zani found in one of the collections 
 of prints in Paris, a proof of the ' Pax of Florence,' 
 executed in 1452 by Maso Finiguerra as shown by 
 the official registers German scholars looked upon 
 Martin Schongauer as the true inventor of copper- 
 plate engraving ; quoting in testimony some impres- 
 sions executed, according to them, about 1460. From 
 this period, already far removed from us (as the 
 Abbe Zani's discovery took place only at the end 
 
 t 
 
 * 'Gazette des Beaux-arts/ March, 1869. 
 
4 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 of the eighteenth century), investigators have not been 
 discouraged, and their efforts have been crowned 
 with success. Passavant, in the 'Archives de Nau- 
 mann' (4e Annee, 1858, p. i), has carefully described 
 a figure of the Virgin, bearing date 1451. Renouvier, 
 in a very learned pamphlet, has revealed the existence 
 of a series of prints of the 'Passion,' executed in 
 1446. Persevering efforts in this direction might, 
 without doubt, lead to some new discovery. Some 
 day or other, we doubt not, Germany or Flanders will 
 be proclaimed the inventor of printed engravings ; and 
 that the archives of history, examined with great care, 
 and turned over in every possible way, will furnish a 
 document before which every ambition must succumb. 
 But we should be much surprised if all these patient 
 researches led to anything more than the knowledge 
 of a mere fact ; and we shall be much mistaken if 
 any art-object worthy of the name can be cited to 
 contradict our theory, that it was in 1452, in Italy, at 
 Florence, that the first really important specimen of 
 the art of engraving appeared ; an event brilliant 
 enough to be in itself alone an historical landmark. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN ITALY. 
 
 Engravers on Wood Nielli Copperplate Engraving at Flo- 
 rence, in the Northern Cities, at Milan, Parma, Bologna, 
 and Rome. 
 
 THE history of engraving in Italy follows that of 
 painting tolerably closely ; many painters were 
 also engravers, and those who did not themselves 
 take the trouble of engraving upon metal or wood, 
 were sufficiently greedy of fame to gather around 
 them engravers who multiplied the works they pro- 
 duced under their supervision. 
 
 Wood-engraving did not in Italy, as in other 
 countries, precede engraving on metal. It appeared 
 at the same time. It is in printed books that we 
 must look for the first instances of this useful art, 
 which, when combined with the text, is peculiarly well 
 suited to bring the author's thought visibly before 
 the eyes, whilst the words explain it to the mind. 
 
 In Italy, wood-engraving was slower in acquiring 
 real importance than in other countries. Although 
 
6 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 from the first half of the fifteenth century, we find 
 many specimens of Italian wood-engraving, recog- 
 nisable solely by their style, none of these attempts 
 bear certain dates, and it is only at the end of the 
 fifteenth century that this form of art was seriously 
 cultivated and practised by true artists. Until then 
 it had been in the hands of artisans, who were more 
 desirous of instructing the faithful than of conforming 
 to the laws of beauty. 
 
 The most curious specimens of Italian wood-en- 
 graving are met with in a rare book called the ' Hyp- 
 nerotomachia Poliphilii,' printed at Venice by the 
 brothers Aldus, in 1499, a book in which are unfolded, 
 amongst dreams more or less fantastic, some reflec- 
 tions on ideal beauty, or the theory of art, composed 
 by Francesco Columna ; this work would have run 
 great risk of remaining in oblivion had it not been 
 embellished by some excellent wood-engravings. 
 This book exhibits compositions which were attri- 
 buted successively to Andrea Mantegna and Giovanni 
 Bellini, executed in a very summary fashion, but with 
 a firmness of touch which proves that their author 
 possessed rare knowledge of drawing. It is true that 
 we do not here recognise the style of these two 
 masters ; but, at the same time, we do not hesitate to 
 affirm that a superior artist alone could have guided 
 the hand of the engraver in this work. 
 
 The sermons of Savonarola, published at Florence 
 the day after they were delivered, also contain a 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 
 
 certain number of woodcuts, which reproduce with 
 accuracy the beautiful Florentine designs of the fif- 
 teenth century. From their first appearance, these 
 engravings had a success sufficiently great to warrant 
 their being simultaneously employed in different pub- 
 lications. The plates which adorn the text of Savona- 
 rola's sermons are again found in ' L'Art de Bien 
 Mourir,' printed at Florence, in 1513 ; and a diligent 
 search would certainly discover these engravings in 
 other publications, as they were well suited to the 
 mystical books of the beginning of the sixteenth 
 century. 
 
 At Rome the art of engraving on wood did not 
 attain the same degree of beauty as in other* Italian 
 cities. The discovery of printing spread there less 
 rapidly, and the artists of the Eternal City seem from 
 the first to have required for their work a field larger 
 than that offered by a book. 
 
 It was in the north, and at Venice particularly, 
 that printers encouraged and employed the best artists 
 of this class. Amongst books brought out in this city, 
 special attention is due to Doni's publications, usually 
 printed by Francesco Marcolini da Forli, and em- 
 bellished by more beautiful wood-engravings than 
 had until then appeared. We must not forget to 
 remark that these works appeared in the middle of 
 the sixteenth century, from 1550 to 1553, when 
 Italian art was already at its zenith. About the same 
 period, many engravers applied themselves to repro- 
 
8 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 duce compositions which Giulio Campagnola and 
 Titian himself drew for that purpose. They executed 
 some admirable engravings engravings properly so 
 called, as not intended merely to adorn a book or 
 illustrate a text, but entirely devoted to producing in 
 fac-simile, and making popular, the works of these 
 masters. As yet, the artist did not dream of showing 
 his own dexterity, but occupied himself solely in 
 faithfully transferring to the wood the design which 
 had been confided to him. He was content (and 
 herein lay his chief merit) to follow scrupulously the 
 outlines traced by the pen or pencil of the painter, 
 and he seems to be far more anxious for the glory of 
 his model than for his own. 
 
 Among the wood-engravers who habitually took 
 their inspiration from Titian's works, Niccolo Bol- 
 drini an artist to whom posterity has been unjust 
 must take first rank. 
 
 The origin of engraving en camaieu * also dates 
 from the sixteenth century. Andrea Andreani, Ugo da 
 Carpi, and Antonio da Trenta, the principal repre- 
 sentatives of this new art, showed remarkable genius 
 in their works. They copied the compositions of 
 Raphael and of Parmigiano in preference to those of 
 other masters, and, by means of several consecutive 
 printings, succeeded in imitating washed drawings, 
 
 * This term is applied to painting or printing in a single 
 colour, varied only in depth of tints (as red, blue, bistre, &c.). 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 
 
 and giving an exact . representation of designs exe- 
 cuted in many tints, and therefore more difficult than 
 others to be faithfully copied. 
 
 During the two centuries which followed, engraving 
 on wood was suddenly, and almost entirely, abandoned 
 in all countries. In the middle of the eighteenth 
 century we only find one engraver in Italy endeavour- 
 ing to restore to favour a process formerly employed 
 with such happy results by the artists we have named. 
 Antonio Maria Zanetti published at Venice, in 1749, a 
 series of prints, executed en camaieu by himself, after 
 designs by Parmigiano ; but he had no imitators, and 
 confined himself to this one publication. Even now 
 that wood-engraving has by degrees regained a very 
 important position, it hardly exists in Italy, which 
 has hitherto been the first to adopt every new inven- 
 tion, and, until the middle of the sixteenth century, 
 had taken the first place in every branch of art. 
 
 Engraving on Metal Nielli. A goldsmith of Flo- 
 rence, Maso Finiguerra, had just put the last touch 
 to an engraving of a ' Pax,'* ordered by the brothers 
 of the church of St. John, and wishing to see the effect 
 of his work, filled the lines traced by his graver 
 
 * ' Pax,' is the name given to a plate of chased metal, enamelled 
 or niello, still used in the solemn feasts of the Agnus Dei. It 
 was called 'Pax' because, after it had been kissed by the offi- 
 ciating priest, the acolyte, in presenting it to each of the assisting 
 ecclesiastics, pronounced the words " Pax tecum." (Littre, 
 { Dictionnaire de la Langue Franchise,' t. ii., p. 906). 
 
io WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 with a liquid composed of oil and lamp-black. By 
 chance, a pile of damp linen was placed upon the 
 silver plate thus prepared, and the sunk lines filled 
 with black liquid were reproduced upon the linen. 
 
 Such, we are assured, was the origin of engravings. 
 Is this legend true or false ? It is impossible to cite 
 any trustworthy document either for or against it ; 
 but no one doubts that Maso Finiguerra is the author 
 of the ' Coronation of the Virgin,' a niello, engraved 
 in 1452. The original plate is in the Urfizi Gallery, 
 at Florence, and the only known impression from it is 
 carefully preserved in the Bibliotheque de Paris. 
 Must we believe that no engraving appeared before 
 this time? and are we to consider 1452 the date of 
 the origin of engraving on metal ? This opinion was 
 accepted for a long time, but now scholars 'have 
 brought to light prints which contradict it. If, how- 
 ever, we are to admit that an art is not really invented 
 before it produces a choice work, we may, until further 
 information, consider the ' Pax ' of Maso Finiguerra 
 the first specimen known of the art of engraving. 
 
 At Florence, as in other Italian cities, goldsmiths' 
 work was very much in fashion at the beginning of the 
 fifteenth century ; and this, like other branches of art, 
 was then practised by men of real merit. At this 
 time goldsmiths adorned most of their works with 
 sunken designs, and these designs were called " nielli." 
 Their mode of testing their work was as follows. 
 When they had engraved the required design upon 
 
A PAX. 
 From the Niello by Maso Finiguerra. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 1 1 
 
 the metal, they first took an impression in very fine 
 clay ; upon this they sprinkled sulphur, and then, by 
 filling in the engraved parts with lamp-black, they 
 were able to obtain a just notion of their work. 
 Until perfectly sure of the final result, they would not 
 have dreamt of pouring in the indestructible enamel 
 or coloured matter called " nigellum," which, when 
 once in its place, prevented any further impression 
 being taken. 
 
 When they discovered that damp paper firmly 
 pressed upon the plate, im- 
 pregnated with a certain ink, 
 gave the same result, they 
 abandoned the use of sul- 
 phur, and their trials on paper 
 became engravings. They did 
 not at once see all that their 
 discovery involved. For a 
 long time workers in gold 
 confined themselves to the 
 small number of impressions 
 necessary to the progress 
 of their work ; and it is to 
 this indifference that we must Fi> I '- 
 
 attribute the extreme rarity of these early impressions, 
 and the great value which amateurs attach to them. 
 (The neuter noun "nigellum," is usually called 
 " niello," and is applied indiscriminately to the plate 
 itself and the impression taken from it.) 
 
12 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 The nielli are by no means all of equal merit, and 
 were it not for their rarity many would be scarcely 
 worthy of a place in choice collections. Indeed, 
 although the Italian masters, and men of true genius, 
 were the first to express grandeur of form and perfect 
 beauty on metal, we must not ignore the fact that 
 there were many second-rate artists working and pros- 
 pering at the same time. Instead of always deriving 
 their inspiration from the examples before them, they 
 were sometimes imprudent enough to borrow their 
 models from the neighbouring countries, thereby 
 voluntarily depriving their works of the stamp of 
 nationality, which generally distinguished Italian pro- 
 ductions of the fifteenth century. We must not sup- 
 pose that the use of niello was given up as soon as 
 the means of taking impressions by other processes 
 were discovered. The previous demand for nielli 
 still continued, and goldsmiths were not inclined to 
 put in jeopardy an art which brought them honour 
 and profit ; they thus still covered with engravings the 
 plates which were to ornament furniture, armour, or 
 caskets. It was only towards the beginning of the 
 sixteenth century, when public taste took another 
 direction, that they abandoned this kind of work. 
 
 We know the names of a certain number of niel- 
 lists, but this is about all we do know. These artists 
 did not appear worthy of special mention to the his- 
 torians who wrote of the sixteenth century, and the 
 few works they have signed reveal nothing of their 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 13 
 
 lives. We can put the names of Maso Finiguerra, 
 Peregrini da Cesena, Antonio Pollajuolo, Matteo di 
 Giovanni Dei, Francesco Raibolini, called Francia, and 
 of Marc-Antonio Raimondi under the works attributed 
 to them with almost absolute certainty, or great proba- 
 bility, but it would be difficult to give the smallest 
 biographical details about many of them ; say for in- 
 stance of Matteo di Giovanni Dei, to whom tradition 
 ascribes two plates, preserved in the Uffizi Gallery 
 at Florence, the ' Crucifixion,' and the ' Conversion of 
 St. Paul ;' but as we cannot compare these anonymous 
 works with any signed drawings of Matteo di Giovanni 
 Dei, we ought scarcely to sanction this tradition. On 
 the contrary, some official reports published by Gaye 
 in his ' Carteggio d'Artisti ' prove undeniably that the 
 most illustrious of all these artists, Maso Finiguerra is 
 really the author of the Florence ' Pax,' representing 
 the ' Coronation of the Virgin,' and this is enough to 
 prove that other nielli which denote singular know- 
 ledge and exquisite taste, may be attributed to the 
 same hand. 
 
 Peregrini da Cesena engraved a considerable number 
 of nielli on metal, which he sometimes signed in full 
 and sometimes with a monogram only. He was 
 evidently greedy of fame, for he is the only artist who 
 signed the greater part of his productions. 
 
 The painter and engraver Antonio Pollajuolo, is 
 thought to be the author of two other small nielli 
 which are remarkable for the somewhat puerile exact- 
 
14 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 ness of the drawing of the muscles and bones of the 
 human body. 
 
 As for Francesco Francia and Marc- Antonio 
 Raimondi, we know enough of their works to be able 
 to admire the nielli attributed to them without fear 
 of mistake. After being for a long time much under- 
 rated, Francia is now, by some enthusiastic admirers, 
 considered a painter of the first order. To us both 
 opinions appear equally exaggerated. The pictures, 
 incontestably by this artist, exhibited in the Pinacoteca 
 at Bologna, his native place, certainly show great 
 artistic feeling and rare knowledge of drawing, but 
 does this entitle their author to take rank among and 
 share the renown of the greatest masters ? Certainly 
 not : and while on this subject, we must say that we 
 consider the nielli attributed to him, of which we 
 have seen the original plates at Bologna, are by no 
 means so beautiful as the indiscriminate admirers of 
 every work of his would have us believe. These plates 
 represent ' Christ on the Cross ' and the ' Resurrection.' 
 The arrangement and style of the figures recall the 
 designs engraved by Marc-Antonio Raimondi after 
 Francia, -and this is equivalent to saying that they 
 have neither imaginative power, nor grandeur of style 
 sufficient to warrant the fame they enjoy. Marc- 
 Antonio Raimondi has nothing to gain by being con- 
 sidered an engraver in niello. The few prints attri- 
 buted to him which we have seen in Paris, or in Count 
 Durazzo's collection at Bologna, add no new lustre to 
 
ENGRA VING IN IT A LY. 15 
 
 his glory ; we will therefore merely remember his 
 name, reserving our appreciation of him as an artist 
 until we consider Italian engraving ; for he devoted his 
 talent almost exclusively to reproducing the sublime 
 works of Raphael. 
 
 The number of anonymous artists who worked in 
 niello is very considerable. It would perhaps be 
 interesting to try and discover the authors of composi- 
 tions which are often excellent and worthy of an illus- 
 trious name, but this is not the place for such an 
 undertaking, and we think it will be more to the point 
 to show how Italians may profit by the discovery of 
 printed proofs, and to review briefly the history of 
 engraving, properly so called. 
 
 Engravings, properly so called. When Italian gold- 
 smiths, unconsciously to themselves, discovered en- 
 graving, artists to whom the process of chasing was 
 necessarily familiar, availed themselves of it, and 
 created for themselves the name of engravers. This 
 transition was made insensibly and unnoticed by all. 
 As soon, however, as Italian art assumed a character- 
 istic style, it divided itself into several schools, which 
 must be separately studied. The Florentine artists 
 aspired to another ideal than did those of the northern 
 cities, who again differed essentially from the masters 
 of Umbria, or the Roman States. Thus Florence, 
 Venice, Milan, Rome, Modena, and Bologna, who took 
 so great a part in the development of the new art, all 
 
16 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 demand attention, for reasons often very different, as 
 each one produced engravers who were clever in pre- 
 serving the national originality, which characterises 
 these schools. There were as many schools as cities. 
 We will endeavour to point out their distinctive cha- 
 racteristics, and at the same time make them serve as 
 divisions of our work. 
 
 Florence. In engravings properly so called, as well 
 as in nielli, Florence is in advance of the other Italian 
 cities. This city was really predestined to lead. After 
 producing in the middle ages the best works of the 
 early Italian masters, Florence was also the cradle of 
 engraving ; it seemed indeed that these two arts, which 
 so much assist each other, were destined to be born 
 under the same sky. 
 
 The first engravings on metal executed in Italy are 
 found in the ' Monte Santo di Dio ' (1477), and in an 
 edition of ' Dante ' (1481). If Vasari is to be believed, 
 a great painter supplied the designs and even assisted 
 in the engraving. This artist was Sandro Botticelli, 
 and for a fellow-labourer seems to have had Baccio 
 Baldini, an artist whose life is little known, but to 
 whom Bartsch attributes a number of engravings. 
 Those of the ' Prophets ' and the ' Sibyls ' in the ' Monte 
 Santo di Dio ' and ' Dante,' betray an inexperienced 
 hand, but they are valuable on account of their accu- 
 rate drawing ; they betoken a great appreciation of 
 beauty, and though the artists to whom they are 
 
<IVN DO SARA WEZTO 10AV1D DILETTO 
 nX) CH^ARAMCHARWATO 
 
 CRlATO 
 
 E LPVALFEPO DAhOLTl. 
 
 RIPKEN DERA CONDOLClKf A DAMORE 
 
 EREI EUVOt/1 riELDRPREGIo 
 
 Fig. 2. Sibyl Agrippa. SANDRO BOTTICELLI. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 19 
 
 attributed, expressed their thoughts imperfectly, owing 
 to their ignorance of all the resources of the new pro- 
 cess, they are still full of interest and worthy of the 
 highest respect. The two series of the ' Prophets ' and 
 the ' Sibyls ' were so much sought after when they 
 appeared, that the plates were worn out and required 
 retouching in a very short time. They were copied 
 by German artists about the beginning of the sixteenth 
 century, and this shows that they were of sufficient 
 merit to be attributed with every probability to Sandro 
 Botticelli. The general style and the treatment of the 
 heads are the same as in this great master's pictures. 
 To give an example from the authentic works of the 
 great Florentine, we will notice a ' Recumbent Venus/ 
 formerly in the possession of the Marquis Campana, 
 but now in the Emperor Napoleon's collection. The 
 head of the goddess is exactly the same as that of 
 the ' Sibyl Agrippa,' and, making due allowance for 
 the difference between painting and engraving, it is 
 clear that the artist has in both cases worked on a 
 settled plan, not troubling himself much with his 
 model until he has given the outline of the face and 
 form he means to represent in a few firm and skilful 
 strokes. 
 
 A contemporary of Maso Finiguerra, and like him 
 a niellist and goldsmith, Antonio Pollajuolo, seems to 
 have worked at the same time as the artists of whom 
 we have spoken above. He was born at Florence in 
 1426, as testified by an inscription on his tomb. He 
 studied successfully under Bartoluccio and Lorenzo 
 
20 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Ghiberti, but he left the studios of these artists to 
 work in gold on his own account. If Vasari is to be 
 believed (and he is the only historian who has trans- 
 mitted authentic documents relating to this artist) 
 Pollajuolo had a marvellous talent for working in 
 metal ; and although his productions were most ex- 
 quisite and soon widely sought after, he was not 
 content with being an excellent goldsmith, but wish- 
 ing to study painting he asked his brother, Piero 
 Pollajuolo, to teach him the secrets of this great art. 
 Endowed with marvellous energy and of an invincible 
 will, his renown as a painter was soon equal to that 
 which he had gained as a goldsmith. However this 
 may be, his pictures are rare enough. Those which 
 we were able to see at Florence, Milan, and London, 
 appeared to us as remarkable for the pedantry with 
 which the artist has paraded his knowledge of 
 anatomy, ,as for the really noble taste of the designs. 
 This systematic exaggeration of human forms, com- 
 bined with praiseworthy refinement of style, is cer- 
 tainly reproduced in three engravings attributed to 
 him: 'Combat of Ten Naked Men,' 'Hercules and 
 Antaeus,' and the ' Combat of Two Centaurs.' It is 
 true that only one of these is signed, but what does 
 that matter if the others are proved to have come 
 from the same studio ? Besides Pollajuolo is easily 
 recognisable in his works ; he had certain peculiar 
 notions about designs, and he would not, like most of 
 his contemporaries, have left unrevealed the secrets of 
 an art which he had fathomed. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 21 
 
 If we believe certain recent documents, Fra Filippo 
 Lippi was both the artist and engraver of an 'An- 
 nunciation ' and a ' Crucifixion/ which form part of a 
 series of fifteen pictures relating to the ' Life of the 
 Virgin.' It is certainly not improbable that the two 
 plates were executed after designs by Fra Filippo 
 Lippi ; but that they were by his own hand appears 
 to us, at least, doubtful. In comparing them with 
 some anonymous prints executed at the same period, 
 ' The Preaching of St. Mark/ ' David slaying Goliath/ 
 'Solomon appearing before the Queen of Sheba/ and 
 ' The Last Judgment/ for example, we recognise that 
 the hand which somewhat inaccurately engraved these 
 wonderful and skilful designs is that of the author of 
 the prints in question. Again, if Filippo Lippi were 
 really the author of these engravings he would have 
 marked them with his own monogram, and he would 
 not, particularly in the 'Life of the Virgin/ have omitted 
 the head of Lucrezia Buti, which he had taken for his 
 prototype of the mother of Christ, and which occurs 
 so frequently amongst the faces of his women in his 
 pictures and frescoes. Let us add, that if indeed their 
 author was Fra Filippo Lippi, he must have produced 
 them very early in his adventurous life, and even this 
 idea is contradicted by weighty arguments ; as Lippi's 
 very first pictures show a feeling for beauty of which 
 there is but little trace in these disputed prints ; and 
 though not presenting much skill in workmanship, 
 these plates would show a firmness in design and a 
 
22 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 decision in expression of which there is not even a 
 foreshadowing. 
 
 Vasari, who has given a long chapter to engravers 
 by profession, does not mention Robetta. He seems 
 to have considered this artist a mere goldsmith. 
 Whatever may be the cause of this forgetfulness 
 and it is of little consequence, the plates being more 
 eloquent than the best authenticated descriptions 
 we must assert that the prints signed with this name 
 merit special attention. Drawn with unvarying beauty 
 and elegance, and engraved with a boldness and ease 
 rare amongst the early Italians, they may sometimes 
 be marred by timidity and inexperience, never by 
 want of taste or incorrectness of design. Unlike 
 most of the engravers of his time, Robetta was not 
 content to draw fully-draped forms alone, he attempted 
 nude figures also, in order to show how deeply he had 
 studied anatomy. The men in his works, who are 
 mostly young, seldom display much muscular develop- 
 ment, except as in ' Hercules and Antaeus,' when the 
 subject demands it, they are agile and supple rather 
 than vigorous, masses of curling hair shade their 
 brows, and instead of the austerity usual in contem- 
 porary Florentine compositions, their faces wear mild 
 and smiling expressions. The delicate and graceful 
 forms of his women are perfectly chaste in their 
 absolute nudity ; they are full of elegance, and there 
 is a strange charm in their pure unveiled bodies. 
 Although belonging to the old school, Robetta ad- 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 23 
 
 vanced his art so much, that he may be considered 
 the last of the early engravers. 
 
 It is a strange fact that we must now turn to France 
 to find artists who retained the peculiarities of the 
 Florentine school. Florentine taste, considerably 
 modified no doubt, is certainly easily recognised in 
 some works by our fellow-countrymen. Francis I. 
 and Henry II., as is well known, attracted Leonardo 
 da Vinci and Andrea del Sarto to their court ; these 
 two artists, quickly followed by Primaticcio and Rosso, 
 were accompanied by a number of engravers, who, 
 labouring alike at French and Italian works of art, 
 introduced their native style and founded the famous 
 school of Fontainebleau, which occupies so important 
 a position in the history of art. If it had not been for 
 engravings the memory of this famous school might 
 never have been preserved. The works of Rosso have 
 entirely disappeared, and, with the exception of the 
 grand ' Galerie des Fetes,' which has already required 
 constant restoration, there is scarcely a trace of Pri- 
 maticcio's sojourn in France. Still the influence of 
 these artists was immense. Under their auspices art 
 underwent a complete metamorphosis. After deriving 
 their inspiration now from Flanders, now from Italy, 
 the French in their turn inspired artists from all coun- 
 tries. The Italians, too, modified their style, and 
 Rosso, who had just decorated the walls of the con- 
 vent of the Annunziata at Florence with an admirable 
 fresco, broke with the traditions of his school and 
 
 ^ Of THl^^^ 
 
 TrinyBRsiTTl 
 
24 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 changed his style as soon as he set foot on French 
 soil. In fact he changed so completely that he soon 
 became more French than the French themselves. 
 Art, hitherto exclusively Christian, now borrowed 
 subjects largely from mythology ; and, from a powerful 
 auxiliary of the Church, she now suddenly became 
 pagan, and chose to represent the adventures of gods 
 and goddesses and the exploits of fabulous heroes on 
 the walls of Fontainebleau. This was certainly quite 
 a new opening and a strange and significant change. 
 If these mystical paintings had not coincided with the 
 tastes of the masters of Fontainebleau would they 
 have preferred such subjects ? To ask the question is 
 to answer it. Nothing is more natural than that the 
 walls of a gay mansion, where the court lived in a 
 perpetual round of gaiety should be covered with 
 bacchanals, sirens, and fauns, rather than with biblical 
 personages. Rosso was the first to be entrusted with 
 the decoration of Fontainebleau. He thoroughly 
 understood the necessities of his work, he identified 
 himself with the idea he had to carry out, and for a 
 time at least he was able to forget where he had learnt 
 his art and to devote himself entirely to fulfilling the 
 wishes of his employers. 
 
 When we consider French engraving, we will ex- 
 amine more thoroughly the extraordinary importance 
 of this school of Fontainebleau ; at present we content 
 ourselves with noticing the part Florence took in this 
 movement, and the ascendency which a master of her 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 25 
 
 school obtained over his contemporaries. But Floren- 
 tine art, so homogeneous and full of life at the begin- 
 ning, declined rapidly at the close of the sixteenth 
 century. Historians notice some marks of talent 
 without naming any prominent individual. Hence- 
 forth the first place belongs to neighbouring coun- 
 tries. 
 
 The cities of Northern Italy. One of the artists 
 who adopted the new style with the greatest success, 
 seems to have been Andrea Mantegna. Born at 
 Padua in 1431, he learned drawing under Francesco 
 Squarcione, and when quite young devoted himself 
 to painting. His genius procured him the protec- 
 tion of Luigi da Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua, and 
 he was chosen by Pope Innocent VIII. to decorate 
 the chapel of the Belvidere. As a painter his fame 
 became immense, and his works have been extremely 
 admired ever since his time. His wish to see the 
 compositions he proposed to execute and did exe- 
 cute later in the palace of the Duke of Mantua 
 widely spread, was evidently one of his chief motives 
 for adopting and patronising engraving. Unfortu- 
 nately he could not finish his series of engravings of 
 the ' Triumph of Caesar ;' the slowness of the process, 
 the necessity of producing works of a different kind, 
 compelled him to abandon it, but happily for the 
 greater glory of art he still sometimes handled the 
 graver, and brought out several plates worthy of the 
 
26 . WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 admiration they always excite. It is true that his 
 prints have not the truth, the correctness of detail, 
 the exquisite finish of his paintings ; but if we miss 
 the minute exactness unattainable on metal, we have 
 the bold and skilful strokes of a hand which is con- 
 tent with a sketch, and reserves its full power for 
 the painting. But does this apparent negligence or 
 rather freedom and ease interfere with the correctness 
 of the outline or the force of the expression ? Not in 
 the least. We may even assert that the studied rug- 
 gedness and the systematic intention to avoid pic- 
 turesque effects, have stamped this master's engravings 
 ' The Entombment,' and the ' Descent to Hades/ for 
 instance with a gloomy grandeur of their own, ad- 
 mirably suited to the subjects. Mantegna appeals to 
 the soul, not to the eye. Always in quest of beauty, 
 but of beauty rather majestic than graceful, he has a 
 great predilection for touching scenes and mournful 
 episodes. His figures have ever a peculiar nobility 
 and grandeur, whether he call upon us to mourn the 
 dead Christ with St. John, or to look at a drunken 
 youth reclining on a wine cask, supported by a faun. 
 The Virgin, as he understands her, is neither mild 
 nor resigned ; how proud she is, on the contrary, of 
 her divine Son adored by the eastern kings how 
 overwhelmed she is with sorrow at the entombment ! 
 But Mantegna has elsewhere expressed beauty of 
 quite a different type. In a print attributed to him 
 of ' St. Sebastian,' he has given a perfect notion of 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 
 
 27 
 
 elegance and youth. Agile and supple this figure 
 might pass for a personification of adolescence. 
 
 Andrea Mantegna's prints ought, strictly speaking, 
 to be considered the first engravings executed in Italy. 
 
 Fig. 3. Virgin and Child. MANTEGNA. 
 
 Until then many goldsmiths, sometimes ot excep- 
 tional talent, had, it is true, devoted themselves to 
 engraving at Florence, Venice, Bologna, and other 
 towns ; but Mantegna was the first artist of note who 
 
28 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 engraved plates to be printed from, which were des- 
 tined to inspire and lead an entire school. 
 
 The school formed by Mantegna's works, and 
 directed by the master himself for some years, defi- 
 nitely naturalised engraving in Northern Italy, but 
 the artists who belonged to it are almost unknown. 
 Careless of fame, they generally neglected to sign 
 their works with a monogram or any mark of identifi- 
 cation, and if by chance they did sign them, it was 
 with initials only, so that recognition is still difficult. 
 
 The names of two artists, Zoan Andrea and Gio- 
 vanni Antonio da Brescia are preserved to us ; but if 
 we are able to attribute some few prints to them, 
 numbers still remain unappropriated. 
 
 The greater number of plates issued from Man- 
 tegna's school have no very striking qualities. Exe- 
 cuted under the eye of the master, or at least in his 
 style, they may show accurate knowledge and lofty 
 aspirations, but none of them deviate sufficiently 
 from the school-routine to have a distinct personality. 
 They are works of docile pupils, who set small store 
 by their own originality. There were, however, ex- 
 ceptions to this. Where it seemed less needed, Man- 
 tegna's pupils gave decided proofs of original power ; 
 we allude to the ornaments and arabesques, which 
 they arranged with marvellous skill. They had ad- 
 mirable sculptures at hand in the churches and palaces 
 of Northern Italy, accurate and varied traceries sur- 
 rounding the porticos, decorating the tombs, or cover- 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 29 
 
 ing the friezes of the monuments. In these works, 
 where imagination is free, and the human form, if 
 employed, accommodates itself to the exigencies or 
 caprices of the artists, without prejudice to art, Man- 
 tegna's pupils were able to give the reins to their 
 fancy ; and whilst remaining faithful to the principles 
 of their school, they invented and distributed with 
 their engravings a number of charming arabesques, 
 such as but for them could only have been admired 
 at Venice, Verona, or Padua. 
 
 Great as was Mantegna's authority with the en- 
 gravers of Northern Italy, a school of art was formed 
 at Venice independently of him. The master of the 
 Venetians' choice and affection was the famous Gio- 
 vanni Bellini, and if by chance they were attracted by 
 Mantegna's frescoes belonging to the Eremitani of 
 Padua, or in the Gonzaga's palace, they soon gave 
 fresh evidence in their work of their exclusive and 
 unchangeable admiration for G. Bellini, Titian, and 
 Giorgione. Fortunate city to entertain such a band 
 of men of genius ! fortunate engravers to find such 
 magnificent models in the works of contemporary 
 artists ! But are we to suppose that Venetian en- 
 gravers always borrowed from others that they never 
 themselves invented their subjects ? Certainly not. 
 Although all their works are to some extent under 
 a common influence, we cannot suppose, when we ex- 
 amine plates by Mocetto, Giulio and Domenico Cam- 
 pagnola, Benedetto Montagna, or Giacomo di Barbari, 
 
30 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 that these artists were always content with the modest 
 office of interpreters. They were mostly painters, 
 and we can understand that they engraved their own 
 works in preference to those of others. Even when 
 they borrowed their subjects, they stamped them with 
 an originality all their own. 
 
 Girolamo Mocetto, whose life is almost unknown, 
 was at the same time a painter and an engraver. 
 Many paintings signed in full by him do not give a 
 very great idea of his talent as a painter. They are 
 neither remarkable for originality nor beauty of style. 
 But his engravings present him in a more favourable 
 light. Though the hand is somewhat harsh and in- 
 experienced, it has knowledge and a great feeling for 
 drawing. Mocetto reproduced compositions in Man- 
 tegna's style with great skill, taking his chief inspira- 
 tion from this master ; he sometimes reflected also 
 the grandeur of certain of Bellini's works. His prints 
 were executed from very soft copper, which accounts 
 for their rarity. The richest collections contain very 
 few examples, but the Cabinet des Estampes in Paris 
 possesses more than all other collections added to- 
 gether. Two plates, ' Judith and Holofernes,' and 
 ' Bacchus beneath a Vine,' are sufficient to give a very 
 high opinion of their artist's talent. These engrav- 
 ings, which are the finest of Mantegna's works, in- 
 terest us especially, because they prove that, like the 
 greater number of his contemporaries, he knew no- 
 thing of Albert Diirer's engravings, introduced into 
 
ENGRA VING IN IT A LY. 31 
 
 Italy at this period, or if he did know them, he 
 entirely ignored them. 
 
 Giulio Campagnola was a scholar ; he read Greek 
 and Latin, and knew Hebrew. His father, being a 
 learned man, took care to give his son, when young, a 
 good education. But whilst pursuing his study of 
 languages his taste for art betrayed itself, and was 
 so conspicuous that one of his contemporaries, Matteo 
 Bosso, writing to Hector Theophanes, did not hesitate 
 to say, " his works may compete with those of the 
 great Venetian masters ; he can render a painting of 
 Mantegna's or Bellini's better than any other artists, 
 and he is more successful in portrait-taking than were 
 any of his predecessors." Making due allowance for 
 the exaggeration of this Matteo Bosso was a personal 
 friend of the Campagnolas we cannot but own that 
 the young painter's first efforts must have been very 
 brilliant. We know, positively, that he was among 
 the men of genius attracted to the court of Ferrara by 
 Hercules d'Este. We are ignorant in what capacity he 
 mixed in this august assembly ; if in that of a painter, 
 we are unable to pronounce on his merits, for his pic- 
 tures are now unknown, having been lost, destroyed, 
 or attributed to some more famous masters, a common 
 fate we must remark by the way of unsigned works, 
 or of those which recall some illustrious style. In 
 any case, none of Giulio Campagnola's pictures are 
 preserved to us. We can judge of his style only by the 
 engravings he has signed, and which time has spared. 
 
32 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 They are not all distinguished by the same qualities : 
 some are influenced by Albert Diirer, and remarkable 
 for the peculiar nature of the work to which the artist 
 has devoted himself, others reproduce compositions 
 which may safely be attributed to Giorgione, Giovanni 
 Bellini or Mantegna ; they honestly preserve the style 
 of these masters without giving the figures very ex- 
 actly, the engraver having been content to sacrifice 
 strict truth to the charm of colour. Giulio's land- 
 scapes taken from the countries he lived in, show 
 greater study of nature than his figures. Giulio Cam- 
 pagnola was one of the first who conceived the idea of 
 representing in engraving the colour of pictures. This 
 he did by small dots nearer or further apart, which 
 contrivance to a certain degree anticipated the inven- 
 tion of aquatint engraving. 
 
 Dominico's relation to Giulio Campagnola is not well 
 established ; but the two namesakes worked together 
 as shown in a plate called ' The Concert,' and also in a 
 design of ' St. John the Baptist/ Dominico's talent 
 differs in many respects from Giulio's. In too great a 
 hurry to work out his ideas on canvas or metal, he is 
 not sufficiently careful about correctness of form, and 
 he is indifferent to beauty ; his enthusiasm carries him 
 away ; and although he attended Titian's studio, some 
 of his works seem to imply that he belonged to the 
 school of a less correct master Jacopo Robusti, called 
 ' Tintoretto.' He deliberately exaggerates outlines, 
 movements, and expressions, under pretence of making 
 
Fig. 4. A youth. GIULIO CAMPAGNOLA. 
 
 D 
 
TIH7IE3IT1 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 35 
 
 them more distinct. The story of his master's jealousy 
 of him will lose all probability when his works are 
 examined. Granted that his landscapes resemble 
 Titian's more than any others, does that justify this 
 famous jealousy ? We think not. With Titian land- 
 scape certainly occupied a large space, but it is gene- 
 rally only the framework of a composition with figures, 
 it is merely an accessory in most of his pictures, and 
 contributes accidentally to his renown. Campagnola's 
 first plans are not nearly so grand as Titian's, and if 
 the skilful execution of his distances justifies this com- 
 parison, so glorious for him, there is nevertheless a 
 uniformity and a want of force in his works which 
 happily do not mar those of the illustrious Venetian. 
 
 Benedetto Montagna, born at Verona, like Mo- 
 cetto, worked from 1505 to 1524. His engravings 
 are less refined and his drawing is less correct than 
 those of his fellow-countryman. He yielded to the 
 influence of Albert Diirer more than any of the artists 
 we have named. His first engravings, after his own 
 paintings, are wanting in grace. But the ' Sacrifice of 
 Abraham ' is cleverly composed and skilfully executed ; 
 the drawing, too, is better than usual. Fine proofs of 
 Montagna's engravings are rare ; executed on scft 
 metal they could only bear a limited amount of 
 printing, and when once they are a little worn they 
 lose nearly all their beauty. 
 
 No birthplace was ever more disputed than was that 
 of Giacomo de' Barbari, known under the name of the 
 
36 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 ' Master of the Caduceus.' Some call him a German, 
 others the contemporary and fellow-countryman of 
 Lucas of Leyden. Some consider France his birth- 
 place, others Ferrara. Recent authors confound him 
 with a certain Jacob Walch, born at Nuremberg. The 
 truth is that he was born at Venice about 1450, a date 
 rendered probable by a picture signed by him and 
 bearing date 1472. It is only fair to add that his 
 style of engraving explains the difference of opinion 
 about him. Remembering the beauty of the limbs of 
 his figures, and a certain grandeur of style in his prints, 
 as in ' Sebastian bound to a Tree,' we do not hesitate 
 to recognise in him a descendant of the school of 
 which Mantegna was the chief ; but again, his plates 
 seem to bear witness to a Teutonic origin. Such 
 opposite qualities in this artist need not surprise when 
 we know that Philip of Burgundy, natural son of 
 Philip the Good, retained Giacomo de' Barbari in his 
 service, and took him first to Nuremberg, and then to 
 Holland, in which country the painter-engraver exer- 
 cised great influence on art. Giacomo de' Barbari 
 died in 1516. His scarce pictures, preserved in 
 private or public galleries, testify still more than his 
 engravings to his Italian origin. Of little imaginative 
 power, he executed a single figure better than a com- 
 position ; but even his figures are out of proportion : 
 they are thin, with heads unduly large or absurdly 
 small. His chief merit consists in the grace of his 
 figures, and the ingenious rendering of the limbs which, 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 37 
 
 in spite of gross incorrectness of drawing, show a deli- 
 cacy of touch and power of colouring, which lead us 
 to suppose him to have belonged to the school of 
 Giovanni Bellini and Giorgione. 
 
 Titian and his pupils were not fortunate in their 
 engravers. With the exception of the author of the 
 woodcuts mentioned above, not a single contemporary 
 artist dedicated his talent to reproduce pictures ; and 
 the small number of plates engraved at that time are 
 the work of men without experience, incapable of 
 copying the models before them. We will not recall 
 the names of these unskilful interpreters, they are 
 unworthy of being rescued from oblivion. At Venice, 
 as in nearly all the other cities of northern Italy, the 
 art had attained its zenith during the fifteenth and 
 sixteenth centuries, but the decadence quickly followed 
 this glorious period. We have made the same remark 
 about the Florentine school, and we shall have to 
 repeat it. Engravers followed the general progress 
 of art in Italy, and after having enthusiastically em- 
 braced the new invention, and after having produced 
 works in which the feeling for colour and form is 
 expressed with peculiar talent, they appear to have 
 suddenly sunk into inactivity. The distance which 
 separates the masters of the fifteenth and sixteenth 
 centuries from their next successors is immense, and 
 the style which belongs to works of the early school 
 is gone beyond recall. In the seventeenth century a 
 Flemish artist, Valentin Lefevre, passed the greater 
 
3 8 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 part of his life at Venice, and engraved with conside- 
 rable minuteness the best works of Titian and Paul 
 Veronese. But being mere sketches, his engravings 
 only give the compositions of these masters, missing 
 the powerful effect and splendid colouring of the 
 originals. 
 
 The Venetian school claims another artist of high 
 merit, though only a landscape painter ; but he did not 
 flourish until the eighteenth century. We allude to 
 Canaletto, who by the aid of his magic needle trans- 
 ferred to copper the charm of his pictures. In his 
 numerous views of Venice, full of vivid lights and soft 
 shadows, his figures cradled in gondolas or walking in 
 the Piazza of St. Mark, or gravely seated under the 
 Doge's palace, are grouped in a talented manner and 
 cleverly hit off. A thousand indefinable things the 
 unrivalled temperature of Venice, the transparency of 
 the atmosphere, the purity of the air, &c., are rendered 
 with surprising felicity. Canaletto's pictures on the 
 walls of our museums seem to Might up the works 
 around and to transport us to this happy land of 
 brightness and sunshine, of glowing horizons and 
 marble palaces. The same qualities in a less degree 
 the graver being less suited than the brush to give the 
 magic of chiaroscuro are also found in the etchings 
 by this master. Canaletto stands alone in the modern 
 Venetian school ; and although one artist, named 
 Guardi, tried to imitate his paintings, not a single 
 engraver took his inspiration from his etchings. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 39 
 
 Whilst Canaletto was working at the best known 
 and most picturesque parts of Venice, a painter who 
 enjoys a somewhat exaggerated reputation was en- 
 graving his own and his father's works, and giving 
 proof of considerable talent. Domenico Tiepolo cer- 
 tainly knew how to obtain charming results by the 
 etching needle ; and although his paintings are in- 
 harmonious, the predominating colour being yellow, 
 his etchings are delightful on account of their life 
 and brightness. One may look in vain for a correct 
 form or an exact outline, his figures are terribly ill- 
 drawn ; but the entire want of accuracy ought not 
 to make us withhold our admiration from these seduc- 
 tive and delightful plates. Justly estimated, Tiepolo's 
 prints are useful examples ; amongst other things, 
 they show what may be done in engraving when the 
 light is well distributed, and many an artist might 
 learn the laws of chiaroscuro by studying them. 
 
 Marco Pitteri engraved the ' Seven Sacraments ' 
 after Pietro Longhi. Avoiding cross-hatching alto- 
 gether, he employed parallel strokes only, varying 
 them in strength according to the amount of light and 
 shade required. Although not very agreeable to the 
 eye, this kind of engraving looks well enough at a 
 little distance. The series of the ' Seven Sacraments,' 
 which are this artist's best works, throw a curious light 
 on Venetian manners in the eighteenth century ; but 
 it is in his subjects taken from domestic life that 
 Pitteri best repays study. Indeed, in his engravings 
 
40 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 of nearly life-sized heads of Jesus Christ, the Virgin, 
 the evangelists, the apostles, or in his portraits after 
 J. B. Piazzetta, we see the inadequacy of his style to 
 copy living models. His plates of this sort are posi- 
 tively painful to look at. But we regain our natural 
 interest in every trustworthy work which gives the 
 customs of a country when we look at four plates 
 after Pietro Longhi : ' A Nobleman setting out for 
 the Chase ; his Retainers making their preparations, 
 cleaning their Arms ;' and again, 'The Nobleman at 
 Table jovially finishing the Day with his Companions/ 
 Longhi's pictures engraved by Pitteri gained for their 
 author the too flattering title of the Chardin of Italy. 
 Whatever merit they may have, they are not worthy 
 of such a comparison, and all the engraver's pains in 
 rendering them . could not remedy the poverty of the 
 design or supply qualities which were wanting. 
 
 We could easily name other engravers of the eigh- 
 teenth century who worked at Venice, and placed their 
 talent at the disposal of the painters who flourished 
 at this period. Amongst them we should have to 
 notice Giacomo Leonardis and Pietro Monaco ; but 
 the part these artists took in the general progress of 
 art was so small that they merit no more than mention. 
 Before leaving the north of Italy, we must glance at 
 the engravers of Milan, Parma, and Bologna, who 
 are worthy of serious attention as much on account 
 of their own merits as for the tendencies of their 
 schools. 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 41 
 
 Milan. At Milan, one great painter inspired a whole 
 school, and his genius influenced an entire generation 
 of artists. Leonardo da Vinci, whose sublime works 
 are not very numerous, was expert in every branch of 
 art. As a painter he executed the famous and well- 
 known ' Last Supper ' on the wall of Santa Maria delle 
 Grazie ; as a sculptor, he modelled the equestrian 
 statue of Francesco Sforza, destroyed by the French 
 in 1499, when Louis XII. entered Milan; as an archi- 
 tect and engineer he superintended the works of the 
 Arno Canal ; he was a musician also, and Vasari relates 
 that L. da Vinci appeared before Francesco Sforza for 
 the first time, at a fete given by the Duke, holding a 
 lyre made by himself, and the company were so 
 delighted with the melodious sounds he produced, that 
 although many musicians were present all the applause 
 was given to him. It is not improbable that he also 
 handled graving and carving tools ; documents pre- 
 served at Paris, Milan and in England, bear witness 
 to the versatility of his genius, and justify this sup- 
 position. In the dedication of his book, ' De Propor- 
 tione Divina,' Luca Paccioli positively asserts that 
 Leonardo da Vinci is the author of the woodcuts 
 which adorn this work : " Nee vero multo post, spe ani- 
 mos alente, libellum cui de Divina Proportions tituhis 
 est, Ludovico Sphorcice, dud Mediolanensi, nuncupavi. 
 Tanto ardore ut schemata quoque sua Vincii nostri 
 Leonardi manibus scalpta f" The text is so explicit as 
 almost to preclude discussion, but after examining the 
 
42 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 volume we find it difficult to believe that L. da Vinci 
 did more than supply the designs. How can we sup- 
 pose that one of the greatest artists ever born would 
 have spent his precious time carefully cutting out 
 letters, cubes, or triangles in wood, when any engraver 
 could have done it equally well ? Amongst the 
 numerous woodcuts illustrating this book, the first 
 alone is of real artistic value. It is a single form in 
 unshaded profile. The precision of the drawing, and 
 the sweet, rather than powerful expression of the face, 
 betray the hand of a Milanese, and the name of 
 Leonardo da Vinci might be written under this figure 
 and never, as we think, be contested. Several other 
 prints are attributed to him, and one, we believe, with 
 justice. Unless these peculiar ornaments, which appear 
 to be composed of knotted cords, may belong, notwith- 
 standing the inscription in the centre " Academia Leo- 
 nardi Vinci," both as regards composition and engraving 
 to some other artist ; indeed, we are aware that some 
 woodcuts signed with Albert Diirer's monogram, repro- 
 duce them exactly. It is not the same with ' Three 
 Horses' Heads ;' we know not to whom to attribute 
 these unless to Leonardo da Vinci. We first saw this 
 plate among a number of engravings of the early 
 Italian school, and it reminded us so much of designs 
 by Leonardo, which we had seen at Milan and Florence, 
 that we at once pronounced this master to be the author. 
 So great was our interest that we were anxious to know 
 if it had been noticed by other historians, and we found 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 43 
 
 that our idea was at least near the truth, as Passavant 
 attributes this engraving to Verrocchio, L. da Vinci's 
 master, and Ottley is disposed to consider it the work 
 of this great artist himself. Since we noticed this print 
 we have studied the three manuscript volumes by Leo- 
 nardo da Vinci, preserved in the splendid collection at 
 Windsor. Great was our delight when we found the 
 engraving in question pasted into one of the books and 
 quoted in support of an opinion written by Leonardo's 
 own hand. This, although not conclusive evidence 
 Leonardo might have taken one of his master's works 
 as an example certainly merits serious attention. 
 We do not like to speak positively about the other 
 plates attributed to this master. We have examined 
 those in the British Museum, and whilst acknow- 
 ledging that we are reminded of the style of the illus- 
 trious Milanese in ' A Woman in Bust and Profile ; ' 
 'A Woman crowned with Ivy/ and 'The Head of an 
 Old Man,' the bust attributed by Bartsch to Man- 
 tegna, we reserve our judgment until further ex- 
 amination, merely suggesting that although certainly 
 inspired by the great master they may have been 
 executed in metal by one of his intelligent pupils. 
 
 If we have lingered long over the engravings attri- 
 buted to this great master, it is because we shall not 
 again have so illustrious a subject to discuss in these 
 pages. The works of the Milanese school are not very 
 numerous, so we can afford to give special attention to 
 those of exceptional merit. As they are nearly all 
 
44 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 anonymous, it is sometimes difficult to know how 
 to treat them. Three early plates, engraved after 
 Leonardo's ' Last Supper/ reproduce this great com- 
 position in a modified form, they are so inferior to the 
 original that we cannot say much for them. 'The 
 slightly bent Head of a young Girl ;' ' A Lover caress- 
 ing his Mistress,' and ' A Young Girl courted by a Man 
 dressed as a Fool,' remind us slightly of the school of* 
 Leonardo da Vinci, but they are unsigned, and cannot 
 be attributed to anyone with certainty. The drawing 
 is that of a pupil, rather than of a master. 
 
 We are less doubtful about three plates attributed 
 to Cesare da Sesto. Although there is no proof that 
 this artist himself transferred his designs to metal, 
 we think we recognise his hand in the ' Beheading of 
 John the Baptist.' The executioner in the 'costume 
 of the sixth century, and wearing a plumed cap, is 
 sheathing his sword, and Salome, carrying the Bap- 
 tist's head on a dish, is following the retreating figure 
 of Herodias. This well-conceived composition reminds 
 us of a hasty sketch, incontestably by L. da Vinci, 
 contained in a volume of his designs lately added to 
 the collection in the Louvre. The two other engrav- 
 ings attributed to Cesare da Sesto are of quite a 
 different kind, they represent ' A Hind reclining on an 
 Isle,' and 'A Browsing Stag.' It is possible that they 
 were engraved by the author of ' John the Baptist,' 
 but he certainly did not draw them. 
 
 Before leaving the artists of the early Milanese 
 

 ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 45 
 
 school, we must say a word on a precious volume 
 containing wood-cuts. They are exquisitely drawn 
 and belong entirely to the school guided by Leonardo 
 da Vinci. This book an account of St. Veronica was 
 printed at Milan in 1518. Amongst the ten engravings 
 it contains, three of them, remarkable for the softness 
 of the drawing and the tenderness of the expres- 
 sion, were certainly designed by Luini. They form 
 the frontispieces of Books III. V. and VI. and are : 
 ' Christ and St. Veronica reading,' * An Angel guiding 
 St. Veronica's Hand, who is writing/ and ' St. Veronica 
 reading from a Book held by an Angel before whom 
 she is kneeling.' 
 
 Parma. We know that it would have seemed 
 more reasonable to speak of the school of Parma after 
 we had reviewed the works executed at Rome ; but 
 we prefer to finish our history of engraving in Italy, 
 with the town where the art attained its highest per- 
 fection. The influence of the Roman school upon that 
 of Parma, great as it was, was not complete. Maz- 
 zuoli, called Parmigiano, followed Raphael it is true, 
 but only in drawing ; the charm, the beautiful colour- 
 ing of his engravings, are far more suggestive of his 
 countryman, the unrivalled Correggio, than of any 
 other master. Antonio Allegri of Parma stands 
 alone in glory ; he towers far above the rest of his 
 school, he overawes his pupils, he makes engravers 
 tremble. Before the indefinite charm of his works, 
 
46 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 which with good reason they consider inimitable, they 
 are absolutely paralysed. So much grandeur over- 
 powers them, and they only recover calmness enough 
 to continue their occupation when they turn to the 
 paintings of Mazzuoli, who, though far less powerful 
 than Allegri, is very clever, and justly considered to 
 be the one who first inspired the school of engraving 
 at Parma. 
 
 Francesco Parmigiano was not only the best en- 
 graver of his school, he was also the first, judging 
 from the results he obtained, to develop fully the 
 resources of the etching needle. Albert Durer, and 
 many of his predecessors, had used this process with- 
 out improving on it at all. In tracing the design upon 
 the varnish the needle should never imitate the work 
 of the graver ; it has its own mission to fulfil, which is 
 to transmit numerous proofs of the same design, which, 
 conceived and promptly executed by the painter, does 
 not require the dangerous interposition of an inter- 
 preter. Etching is, above all other, the engraving 
 best suited to a painter, and anyone with a knowledge 
 of drawing will easily learn it. Francesco Mazzuoli 
 found hitherto unknown resources in this process. 
 Although the engravings signed by him betray in- 
 difference to purity and want of finish, they contain 
 all that makes a painter; they are full of grace 
 and fascination, and of a kind of beauty which is 
 inferior neither to the bold and vigorous, nor to the 
 free and easy style. They also show a knowledge of 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 47 
 
 chiaroscuro, which had escaped the predecessors of 
 Parmigiano, and in this their connection with the 
 school which gave birth to Correggio is clearly seen. 
 
 Religious subjects did not suit Parmigiano's taste so 
 well as those taken from mythology. His ' Christ' is 
 too suggestive of Adonis ; under his needle the 'Virgin' 
 is vain and worldly. Out of place in many instances, 
 this affectation is not so painful in heathen figures 
 such as ' Polyhymnia,' or ' Venus drying herself in 
 leaving the Bath,' where the artist's fancy is freer. 
 From their first appearance, the etchings by Parmi- 
 giano were as successful as his paintings. They were 
 greedily sought after, and several of his pupils, anxious 
 to share their master's popularity, endeavoured to 
 appropriate the process he had raised to such honour. 
 One of them, A. Meldolla, succeeded so well, that his 
 works were sometimes mistaken for Mazzuoli's. 
 Modern learning has rectified this confusion. Working 
 side by side with Parmigiano, under his daily influence, 
 and generally copying his works, Meldolla at last 
 became so identified with his master in his manner of 
 looking at and rendering nature, that the mistakes to 
 which his engravings have given rise are quite ex- 
 cusable. This obedience to his master's principles 
 was so complete, that when Meldolla engraved 
 Raphael's works, he made them so suggestive o 
 Mazzuoli's style, that had not the author of the 
 originals been well known, they might have been 
 attributed to Parmigiano. Yet these two artists 
 
48 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 (Meldolla and Mazzuoli) engraved by different pro- 
 cesses. Whilst Mazzuoli always employed aquafortis 
 only, Andrea Meldolla sometimes called the graver to 
 his aid, and did not hesitate to employ the dry-point, 
 that is to say, he drew with a needle on the bare 
 metal, so as to obtain results which the acid eating 
 into the plate could not reproduce, and which the 
 graver is incapable of rendering. He also made 
 attempts at chiaroscuro engraving on copper. By 
 means of two or three successive printings, he tried to 
 produce what engravers "en camaieu" obtained so 
 well the appearance of a washed drawing ; and this 
 attempt at Parma is curious, as it was in that town 
 that engravers "m camaieu" seem to have combined 
 together to render Francesco Mazzuoli's works. A 
 composition signed with Meldolla's name and dated 
 1540, 'The carrying away of Helen/ admitted him 
 to the rank of an engraver ; but until the end of the 
 eighteenth century his prints were nevertheless attri- 
 buted to Andrea Schiavone, a Venetian painter, a 
 pupil of Titian and Giorgione, or they were mixed up 
 with the anonymous works of the school of Parma. 
 
 Francesco Mazzuoli had no successors : he had 
 guided a large school ; he had enjoyed an immense 
 renown during his life, but his influence died with 
 him, and when her chief was gone, Parma no longer 
 possessed a school of engraving. 
 
 Bologna. Whoever has been to Bologna can testify 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 49 
 
 to the homogeneity of the school which arose there. 
 No museum gives a better notion of the artists of a 
 country than the Pinacoteca of Bologna, where the 
 national masters are represented by their best works, 
 and celebrated pictures are chronologically arranged 
 from the time of the origin of the art to the middle of 
 the sixteenth century. It would be impossible to form 
 a better idea elsewhere of Bolognese artists. The 
 archives and official papers have been carefully searched, 
 and the great works examined by the historians of 
 local art, but all this avails engraving very little, and 
 it is necessary to see the works themselves to judge of 
 the artists born at Bologna or influenced by her 
 school. 
 
 The earliest engraver, Francesco Raibolini, called 
 il Francia, engraved several nielli referred to above. 
 He had two relations, both painters, Giulio and Gia- 
 como Francia, who engraved with little refinement, 
 and in whose works the style of this school is easily 
 seen. The type of their figures is almost Venetian, 
 but the chiaroscuro is wanting, and the engraving 
 itself betrays inexperience. These two artists, per- 
 haps, deserve severe criticism, but side by side with 
 them arose an engraver whose works placed him in 
 front among the masters of his art. Marc- Antonio 
 Raimondi was born at Bologna, he worked under 
 Francesco Francia, learnt the rudiments of his art 
 from him, and at first copied his designs. It was 
 later, when through copying Albert Diirer's prints, he 
 
 E 
 
50 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 had acquired perfect knowledge of drawing and great 
 skill in handling the graver, that he thought of de- 
 voting himself entirely to the service of Raphael. 
 When we consider the Roman school it will be time 
 enough to reflect on the merits of this most celebrated 
 of the engravers of Bologna, and we shall then show 
 the influence which Marc- Antonio exercised over the 
 school of which he was the founder and the chief. 
 The truth is, that the school of Bologna did not 
 assume real importance until the end of the sixteenth 
 century. Just before the time of the Carracci, artists 
 in Bologna began to handle the graver, and their style 
 was subsequently developed by the Carracci. Barto- 
 lomeo Passarotti, Camillo Procaccini and Domenico 
 Tibaldi, belonged to a community where artists and 
 artisans mixed freely together, but they soon left it, 
 and established a rival society headed by Passarotti. 
 But these artists, whose style was rough and their 
 drawing somewhat coarse, failed to attract artists to 
 their school. They needed an authority which their 
 works did not give them. It was the Carracci who 
 established, if they did not actually found, the school 
 of Bologna. The first who began this work was Luigi 
 Carracci. He was a laborious worker of some creative 
 power ; and these qualities, added to a great desire for 
 fame, were excellent in a reformer. Being extremely 
 energetic, the irksomeness of the work only increased 
 his perseverance. His cousins, Agostino and Anni- 
 bale, who were more talented than himself, seconded 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 5 1 
 
 his efforts, and whilst he devoted himself chiefly to 
 the study of drawing, they endeavoured to bring 
 artists back to true study of nature and a real know- 
 ledge of the works of the great masters. Raphael, 
 Correggio, and Titian were their favourite models, 
 and after travelling about to obtain a thorough ac- 
 quaintance with the works of the masters of their 
 choice, they returned to Bologna and opened the 
 celebrated academies, 'degli Desiderosi' and 'degl' 
 Incaminati.' In the first were classed rising artists, 
 pupils of the Carracci, in the second there were none 
 but artists whose genius was already developed, or 
 amateurs who recognised the founders of the school 
 as the true reformers of art. The Carracci revived 
 engraving as well as painting. Luigi was again the 
 first to give expression to his ideas on copper, but he 
 had no greater facility for this art than for painting. 
 He only accomplished six or seven plates, none of 
 which show as much cleverness as those by his 
 cousins. 
 
 Notwithstanding the prodigious number of his 
 paintings, Annibale Carracci found time to engrave a 
 few plates. Two of them in particular assure him a 
 high position among Italian engravers : ' The Dead 
 Christ supported by the Holy Women'* (1597), 
 known under the name of the ' Christ of Caprarola/ 
 because it was executed in that town, is engraved 
 
 * The original plate is still in the Academy of Fine Arts at 
 Bologna. 
 
52 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 entirely with the graving tool with a fineness of touch 
 and justice of expression rarely attained by, this 
 artist ; and ' A Drunken Silenus drinking from a 
 Leathern Bottle, held to him by a Satyr,' shows the 
 same qualities. In this print, Annibale Carracci has 
 not striven for effect, he has been content to illustrate 
 the science of design, and he has succeeded perfectly. 
 In another plate, ' The Holy Family ' (Anni. Car. in 
 fe, 1 590), he has concerned himself chiefly with colour. 
 But here he overrated his power, the transition from 
 black to white are too abrupt and hard ; the faces are 
 not as carefully drawn as usual, and though the head 
 of the Virgin is accurately designed, the plate is of 
 no great merit. 
 
 The two Carracci of whom we have been speaking 
 only gave a small portion of their time to engraving. 
 It was different with Agostino Carracci. We know of 
 a good many paintings by him, but his works in en- 
 graving are still more numerous ; they consist of head 
 and tail-pieces for books, sacred images, historical pic- 
 tures and portraits. His style too often reminds us of 
 that of Italianised artists, such as Cornelius Cort and 
 Philip Thomasin. Agostino Carracci, who drew better 
 than any of them, and understood more thoroughly the 
 art of engraving, made the mistake of producing too 
 much. When he reproduced works by Paul Veronese 
 or Tintoretto, he did not succeed in rendering their 
 grandeur and beauty, and without the charm of colour, 
 their designs are made to appear inadequate and 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 53 
 
 sometimes coarse. It is the same with an engraving 
 of 'Ecce Homo' after Correggio, which is a harsh 
 rendering of that great master's work. But in the 
 most famous of his works, in all respects worthy of 
 the favour it enjoys, the superb portrait of Titian, 
 Agostino Carracci has surpassed himself. The noble 
 master is represented in bust, wearing a cap and the 
 fur-lined cloak he loved so well. We can imagine 
 that in working at this portrait of Titian by himself, 
 the engraver was inspired by the genius of the master 
 whose features he was copying, for never before had 
 he showed so much talent or so thorough a compre- 
 hension of the human countenance. 
 
 The influence of the school directed by the Carracci 
 was great, and the artists belonging to it remained 
 faithful to the principles there instilled. Amongst 
 them there were many whose works until quite recently 
 were attributed to their masters. This led to many 
 names remaining unknown. Two artists have escaped 
 oblivion, Francesco Brizzio, author of the ' Repose in 
 Egypt,' after Correggio, engraved with a very heavy 
 graver, and Giovanni Valesio, a painter, poet, master 
 of the lute, of dancing, and of fencing, who, living at a 
 distance from his master, Agostino Carracci, neverthe- 
 less almost always reproduced his works. Giovanni 
 Lanfranco belongs to the same school, and his ability 
 as a painter his talent was too facile and his taste 
 sometimes doubtful gives him a distinguished place 
 beside the Carracci whose pupil he was. We are 
 
54 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 indebted to him for some engravings after the 
 ' Loggie ' of Raphael, dedicated to Annibale Carracci. 
 They are remarkable for an ease and skill rare 
 amongst the engravers of these immortal works. 
 
 When the influence of the school of the Carracci 
 began to decline, new artists arose who revived 
 the principles of their predecessors and restored the 
 art of Bologna to its former splendour. Guido Reni, 
 who left many admired paintings, also etched a num- 
 ber of plates. The ordinary type of his gainted 
 figures is feeble and insignificant, and he engraved 
 them with too much freedom. Good workmanship 
 is not all that is required ; we could have wished for 
 more grandeur in his ' Holy Families,' more majesty 
 in the heads of Christ and of the Virgin. These 
 etchings are well and artistically designed, but it 
 is a pity that the 'Virgin adoring the Infant Christ' 
 is too pretty and not sufficiently divine ; her smile 
 is often studied and unreal, and the general expres- 
 sion of her face insipid and affected. Still the exe- 
 cution is graceful and contains effects which none 
 of this master's imitators have been able to render. 
 Simone Cantarini, called the Pesarese, whose style 
 most resembled that of Guido Reni, was not so 
 successful with drapery, but in the pose of the head 
 he has quite equalled his master. Andrea Sirani, 
 Lorenzo Lolli, and some other painters preserved 
 Guido Reni's manner, and followed him accu- 
 rately in their etchings, but as these are mere 
 
ENGRA VING IN IT A LY. 55 
 
 copies they do not deserve a place in the history 
 of art. 
 
 It is different with Domenico Zampieri, an artist of 
 high rank, who though born at Bologna, was thoroughly 
 imbued with the exalted principles of the Roman 
 school, and gained for himself an exceptionally high 
 place among artists. Poussin considered him one of 
 the greatest masters after Raphael, and Guido assigned 
 him similar rank. He did not engrave, at least no 
 plate is attributed to him with certainty. We may 
 well be surprised that his style and knowledge in- 
 spired so few of his contemporaries, for we cannot 
 consider the two we are about to mention his en- 
 gravers. Giacomo Margottini executed one plate, the 
 six 'Christian Virtues,' after this master, and Piero 
 del P6 sometimes followed his style, though generally 
 preferring the works of Nicolas Poussin. If contem- 
 porary artists cared little to reproduce Domenichino's 
 works, those of the next generation rescued them 
 from undeserved oblivion, and largely multiplied and 
 distributed them. Their plates have often served as 
 models to artists ; and although Domenichino's in- 
 fluence was not at first sufficiently great, it lasted long, 
 and his works are now, we are glad to say, estimated 
 at their true value. 
 
 Giovanni Francesco Barbieri, better known as 
 Guercino, may be considered the last celebrated artist 
 of the Bolognese school, but he attached himself to 
 no master in particular. He worked under the super- 
 
56 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 vision of the Carracci, it is true, but he departed so 
 widely from their style, that, fairly speaking, he cannot 
 be considered their pupil. He holds a high place in 
 their school, we think too high. We do not approve 
 of his sudden changes from shadow to light. He 
 had little true love of art, though his facility of 
 production was immense, and his etchings exact re- 
 presentations of his numerous drawings, share their 
 faults. In them clever and rapid execution take the 
 place of correctness of drawing and nobility of ex- 
 pression. 
 
 Rome. At Rome there were not so many skilful 
 engravers as in other Italian cities. Like painting, 
 engraving developed there slowly, and the founder of 
 the Roman school, Marc- Antonio Raimondi was a 
 native of Bologna. We have already spoken of him, 
 but at that time he was still seeking his vocation, 
 hovering between the school of his master Francia 
 and that of the Venetian artists, and even influenced 
 by Albert Durer, whose engravings had just penetrated 
 into Italy. But his style was permanently formed as 
 soon as he arrived in the Eternal City, to which he 
 was attracted by the fame of Raphael. Guided by 
 this master, he engraved 'Lucretia stabbing Herself 
 with such success, that Raphael at once decided to 
 retain so clever an engraver near him ; and it would 
 appear that he gave him the exclusive right to re- 
 produce his works. 
 
Fig. 5. Lucretia stabbing Herself. MARC- ANTONIO RAIMONDI, 
 
U1U7BRSIT7 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ITAL Y. 59 
 
 Raimondi's engravings now succeeded each other in 
 quick succession. The ' Massacre of the Innocents/ 
 
 * Adam and Eve/ * The Judgment of Paris/ and 
 
 * Poetry/ to mention only extraordinary works, are 
 splendid instances of the intelligence with which the 
 engraver rendered on metal the drawings of the 
 painter. Marc-Antonio reproduced drawings only, 
 and never attempted to copy direct from the paintings 
 of Raphael >a fact worthy of notice, as did one not 
 know the cause, the engravings, deprived of their 
 picturesque effects, might be accused of not giving 
 the tone of the original paintings. For those who 
 know Raphael's works this observation will appear of 
 little value. It is easy to perceive that ( Poetry/ 
 engraved by Raimondi, is no more an exact image of 
 the fresco in the Vatican than is his ' St. Cecilia ' of 
 the painting in the Bologna Museum. Remembering 
 that engraving in Marc-Antonio's hands was not 
 suited to rendering his paintings, Raphael preferred 
 to give him his preparatory studies on paper, and in 
 this he showed his admirable taste and clear judgment. 
 
 Marc-Antonio devoted the greater part of his ex- 
 istence to multiplying Raphael's works. But he was 
 not content with this. We have already said, that 
 before founding the Roman school of engraving, he 
 hesitated a long time, and showed great perseverance 
 in seeking a path for himself. Arrived at Rome, the 
 great master whom he joined did not discourage his 
 looking round on the works then sharing public atten- 
 
60 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 tion with his own ; and we could mention engrav- 
 ings executed in Rome by Marc-Antonio Raimondi 
 after other masters than Raphael. But he is so im- 
 bued with the exalted principles of the master of his 
 choice, that he cannot altogether ignore them. In 
 ' The Climbers/ for example, engraved after the cele- 
 brated cartoon of Pisa by Michael Angelo, or in the 
 ' Martyrdom of St. Lawrence,' by Baccio Bandinelli, 
 we find an amount of precision, a reserved power pro- 
 bably rather exceeding that of the original drawings. 
 Nor is it impossible that Marc- Antonio engraved some 
 compositions in which the figures, at least, were origi- 
 nal. But the plates attributed to his pencil, as well as 
 to his graver, are inferior in precision and knowledge 
 to the others. Must we not conclude that this artist, 
 so clever in interpreting the works of others, requires 
 a powerful hand to guide and a strong mind to advise 
 him. The truth is, that unlike most artists, Marc- 
 Antonio Raimondi obtained his great reputation 
 because he was able to renounce his own personality, 
 because he reproduced contemporary works faithfully, 
 with respect, almost with veneration, for the painters 
 at whose service he placed his knowledge and his 
 skill. 
 
 This rare power, added to consummate knowledge 
 of drawing and engraving, bore ample fruit. Having 
 obediently submitted himself to Raphael, Marc- 
 Antonio became a master in his turn. Pupils hurried 
 from all countries eager to take lessons from him and 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 61 
 
 profit by his counsels ; and, thanks to his influence, 
 Rome at length acquired a school of engraving. Those 
 who approached most nearly to the master's style were 
 Agostino Veneziano and Marco of Ravenna. Under 
 Marc-Antonio's direct influence, often working with 
 his eye upon them, they imitated his style so exactly 
 that their works were sometimes taken for his an 
 error which sufficiently proves their merits. 
 
 Like Marc- Antonio, Agostino Veneziano was a long 
 time finding his vocation. In order to acquire ease in 
 handling the graver, he copied some engravings by 
 Giulio Campagnola, rendered compositions by A. 
 Diirer, and on joining the Roman school, not having 
 as yet yielded to the all-powerful fascination of 
 Raphael, he rendered several compositions by Bandi- 
 nelli with all their exaggeration and bombast. He 
 did not place himself under Raphael's influence until 
 towards the end of that master's life, about 1516. 
 His manner at once acquired a power and nobility of 
 which there is no hint in his early works, and the 
 prints he engraved from this date are undoubtedly his 
 best. 
 
 Marco Dente, or Marco of Ravenna (he is known 
 under the latter name in France) was more ready to 
 assimilate himself to his master's style. He rendered 
 several of Marc-Antonio's engravings, and although 
 his copies have not the same precision of drawing or 
 firmness of touch, they give a very good notion of the 
 originals. If we admit, with some authors, that the 
 
 X?^^S\ 
 
 PZU7ERSIT71 
 
62 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 second plate, known as the ' Massacre of the Inno- 
 cents/ is the work of Marco of Ravenna, we must 
 add that the pupil has in this one case approached 
 his master very nearly. This engraving leaves us 
 very doubtful as to its author. The firmness of 
 touch, or, we should rather say, the general beauty, 
 is very striking, and places its author, whoever he 
 may be, beside Raimondi. If it be by Marco of 
 Ravenna, it is his only work of great merit, and but 
 for it, the modest office of copyist, to which he 
 almost exclusively devoted himself, would scarcely 
 have sufficed to give him a prominent place in the 
 history of art. Several artists, though they pro- 
 ceeded from his school, departed in some points 
 from Raimondi's rules. Amongst them was Jacopo 
 Caraglio, an artist of Verona, mentioned by Aretino 
 in the ' Cortigiana ;' according to him, Caraglio is the 
 cleverest engraver after Marc- Antonio. It is only 
 just to add that he owes this very favourable mention 
 to the ' Loves of the Gods ' engraved after Pierino 
 del Vaga and Rosso ; and it was probably the sub- 
 ject, rather than the execution, which interested and 
 fascinated the engraver's apologist. It is difficult to 
 define Caraglio's manner. It is manifold. Now he 
 engraves with a free hand, as in the ' Loves of the 
 Gods ;' now, as in an extensive series of ' Heathen 
 Deities in Niches/ his style is precise and correct, 
 and reminds one by its neatness of Marc-Antonio's 
 manner ; at other times his drawing is coarse and 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 63 
 
 offensive. Caraglio seldom expresses grace, he excels 
 more in force, as seen in his engraving of the ' Virgin 
 and St. Anne between St. Sebastian and St. Roch,' 
 which he composed himself, and which is really valu- 
 able for its rarity rather than for the exalted style of 
 the Virgin's beauty. 
 
 Giulio Bonasone departs still further from Marc- 
 Antonio's school than even Caraglio. His pleasing 
 graver often conceals gross negligence. His numerous 
 works comprise engravings of every sort. Executed 
 from 1531 to 15/4, they vary in value according to 
 the rank of the artists after whom they were com- 
 posed. Bonasone reproduced some drawings by 
 Raphael and Michael Angelo, and, though falling far 
 short of the originals, his engravings are not without 
 charm ; generally, however, he succeeded better with 
 less exalted masters, who were more within his reach. 
 Parmigiano supplied him with a great number of sub- 
 jects to engrave, and he has reproduced on copper 
 several compositions of his own. On the whole, re- 
 membering the originals of Bonasone's prints, we 
 think we cannot call them more than ingenious. 
 They have none of the best qualities ; arranged with 
 ease, perhaps with too much ease, they err in the 
 drawing which wants power, and they err in the 
 execution which is too hasty. The engraver has 
 sacrificed quality to quantity, working much without 
 caring to work well. Cesare Reverdino, a fellow- 
 countryman and contemporary of Bonasone, engraved, 
 
64 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 sometimes with the needle and sometimes with the 
 graver, several small compositions which, in their size 
 at least, remind us of the works of inferior German 
 artists, or of the engravers of the school of Lyons. 
 He was the first Italian artist who succeeded in ren- 
 dering complicated subjects in such a limited space 
 without sacrificing the expression or losing the pic- 
 turesque effect. These engravings were executed 
 from 1531 to 1554. The 'Master of the Die* was 
 one of the cleverest of the artists, who were strongly 
 influenced by Marc- Antonio, and endeavoured to copy 
 his style without taking direct lessons from him. He 
 often copied Raphael, and when not following him he 
 did not leave the Roman school, but sought his 
 models in the works of Giulio Romano and Balthazar 
 Peruzzi. The ' History of Psyche ' was entirely en- 
 graved by the 'Master of the Die.' Several of these 
 important plates have been considered Marc- Antonio's 
 compositions, but the engraving is more clumsy than 
 his and the design less scholarly. In spite of this 
 the care with which the artist has preserved the cha- 
 racter of the drawings attributed to some Fleming 
 copying Raphael's works, gives the 'Master of the 
 Die ' a high position in the Roman school. 
 
 A native of Parma, ^Eneas Vico, came to Rome as 
 soon as he knew enough to profit by regular instruc- 
 tion. He at once yielded to the influence of Marc- 
 Antonio. His first occupation on arriving in Rome 
 was to reproduce the engravings by that master in 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 65 
 
 order to gain facility in the use of the graver. Com- 
 pelled later to comply with the requirements of the 
 editor Tomaso Barlacchi, who shared with Andrea 
 Salamanca the trade in engravings at Rome, he 
 copied simultaneously the compositions of Mazzuoli, 
 of Perino del Vaga, and of Vasari. Towards 1545 
 he left Rome and went to Florence, where, under the 
 special protection of Cosmo II. of Medici, he occu- 
 pied himself entirely with the reproduction of the 
 works of Baccio Bandinelli. His talent had now 
 attained its fullest development, and the ' Leda,' exe- 
 cuted after Michael Angelo, must be considered one 
 of his best engravings. The execution in this plate 
 recalls to us the dignity of Marc-Antonio's works, 
 but at the same time Michael Angelo's drawing, full 
 of his genius and energy, is faithfully rendered. 
 ^Eneas Vico remained only five years at Florence. 
 In 1550 we find him at Venice. There his first en- 
 graving was the ' Portrait of Charles V.,' which was 
 most successful. It was presented to the emperor 
 with ceremony, several descriptions of it were pub- 
 lished, and many artists copied it. At Rome ^Eneas 
 Vico was able to appreciate the monuments of an- 
 tiquity. Having been instrumental in the discoveries 
 of paintings and bas-reliefs made in the sixteenth 
 century, he engraved some of these venerable relics 
 of bygone civilisations. At Venice he turned towards 
 this kind of work from choice. He published several 
 collections of antique medals, and designed ornaments 
 
 F 
 
66 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 in the manner of the ancients. In this he may be 
 said not only to have followed but to have inaugurated 
 a new style, and one which we own corresponded with 
 the requirements of the age ; erudition already occu- 
 pied a large place in Italian art, now, alas ! deprived 
 of its primitive charm. 
 
 An entire family of engravers, natives of Mantua, 
 adopted Marc-Antonio's style on arriving in Rome, 
 and they endeavoured to modify it to suit their own 
 inclinations, but the inevitable result of their study of 
 his works was that they became disciples of the great 
 Roman school. This family, the head of which was 
 Giovanni Battista Scultori, passed the greater part of 
 their existence at Rome. After working as a painter 
 in the ' Palazzo del T. ' at Mantua, under Giulio 
 Romano, Giovanni Battista practised engraving. He 
 has left about twenty plates, almost all after Giulio 
 Romano, which fairly render that master's manner. 
 They are carefully executed, and 'The Naval Combat/ 
 Scultori's chief work, is distinguished by remarkable 
 knowledge of drawing, and great command of the 
 burin. But Giovanni Battista's two children, Diana 
 and Adamo, gained more renown than their father. 
 It is believed that they devoted themselves entirely 
 to engraving. As was natural, Diana at first took 
 lessons from her father, and she was also guided at 
 first by the influence of Giulio Romano, but when 
 she went to Rome and her taste became formed, her 
 style completely changed. As she arrived long after 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 67 
 
 the death of Raphael, she could not have the benefit 
 of direct instruction from this great master, and she 
 had nothing to guide her but the works of his inferior 
 pupils, Raphaellino da Reggio and the Zuccari. Yet 
 in her engravings she contrived to recall the style of 
 the great school which she knew only through the 
 works of Giulio Romano, and she did this with truly 
 marvellous skill in her later works after this master, 
 viz., ' The Nuptials of Psyche,' ' The Banquet of the 
 Gods/ and the ' Bath of Mars and Venus/ These 
 three engravings, which, with a fidelity of execution 
 rare in a woman, most faithfully reproduce the fres- 
 coes preserved in the ' Palazzo del T.' are the most 
 celebrated of Diana Scultori's works. Adamo, Diana's 
 brother, began work very young ; his father placed 
 the burin in his hand at a very early age. There exists 
 a 'Virgin nursing the Infant Jesus,' signed 'Adamo 
 Sculptor, an. xi.' So that when only eleven years old 
 he had already copied an engraving of his father's. 
 Beginning so young, his works were of course very 
 numerous ; we know more than a hundred engravings 
 which bear his name. 
 
 They remind us of those by Diana, and, like hers, 
 they render happily the compositions of Giulio Romano. 
 They show particular aptitude in rendering the antique 
 style of that master's works, and they even exaggerate 
 the appearance of bas-relief in certain of his com- 
 positions. Adamo Scultori engaged in trade in en- 
 gravings. We find his name under a great many 
 
68 WONDERS OF ENGRA V1NG. 
 
 prints which he published without taking part in their 
 production. Amongst these some were executed at 
 the end of the century after Martinelli and Zuccharo. 
 We have restored their own name, Scultori, to these 
 artists. It is not many years since they passed for 
 members of the Ghisi family, because an artist of that 
 name, the most illustrious of the Mantuan engravers, 
 so completely combined all the essential qualities of the 
 school founded under the influence of Giulio Romano, 
 that he eclipsed the fame of the artists who preceded 
 him. But there was no relation between Giorgio Ghisi 
 and the Scultori. Their country was the same, that 
 was all. Giorgio was born about 1520. He is sup- 
 posed to have worked under Giovanni Battista Scultori 
 with Diana and Adamo, with whom he had several 
 qualities in common. He, however, soon surpassed 
 them and left the school of Mantua earlier than they 
 did. He went to Rome when still very young. There 
 he studied Marc-Antonio's engravings, trying to imitate 
 them, and taking his inspiration from compositions by 
 Raphael and Michael Angelo. He engraved the 
 ' Prophets and the Sibyls," after the latter, in which 
 he showed consummate knowledge of drawing, and he 
 managed to translate the grandeur of the compositions 
 in the vault of the Sistine Chapel to his engravings. 
 And yet, his burin being rather heavy, it has given a 
 dull appearance to these noble figures, and the execu- 
 tion looks laboured. Nevertheless, these engravings by 
 Giorgio Ghisi are very superior to those by other 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 69 
 
 artists of the school of Mantua, and with Marc- Anto- 
 nio's works they are worthy to share the exalted posi- 
 tion held by Giulio Romano's paintings after Raphael. 
 In a word, they restore the style of that school, which, 
 after being formed under Giulio Romano, was destined 
 to rise to new eminence at Rome, where, at last, its 
 members could admire the noble masterpieces of that 
 great master, whose unrivalled style they had hitherto 
 only seen as interpreted by his pupil. 
 
 After Giorgio Ghisi's death the influence of Marc- 
 Antonio declined rapidly. Like the school of the 
 great masters, Raphael and Michael Angelo, which 
 disappeared completely in Italy at the end of the 
 sixteenth century, after having attracted to their 
 lessons not only nearly all the engravers of Italy, 
 but even Frenchmen like Beatrizet, Germans like 
 George Penez, Earth, Beham and Jacob Binck, his 
 school also rapidly lost its authority. A new school 
 sprang up at Rome, and the art was preserved for 
 some time, but it abandoned the old principles, and in 
 allowing themselves greater freedom of execution the 
 successors of Marc-Antonio lost the noble and beauti- 
 ful style so universal in Italian productions which had 
 flourished until the middle of the sixteenth century. 
 Mannerism replaced feeling, ease of style took the 
 place of careful thought and true expression. The 
 influence of Agostino Carracci now appears to have pre- 
 dominated, at least his manner was copied by a great 
 many artists, who came to Rome in the seventeenth 
 
;o WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 century to the school of art which then attracted as 
 many foreigners as native Italians. Battista Franco 
 gave proof, at long intervals, of respect and admira- 
 tion for great traditions, and his work was principally 
 devoted to antique objects, but though his very careless 
 drawing does not recall the style of Marc-Antonio, yet 
 he was the only artist who still seems to have remem- 
 bered that master. As for those who followed Franco 
 Giov. Batt. Coriolano and Valerian Regnart, the first 
 engraved a number of vignettes coldly and incorrectly, 
 the pompous subjects of which were suggested by the 
 masters of his school ; and the second gave his time 
 to the reproduction of architectural drawings, armorial 
 bearings, and allegorical compositions ; for Allegory 
 was now forcing its way everywhere, and was often 
 incomprehensible by reason of its being so far-fetched ; 
 nevertheless, Oliviere Gatti, Francesco Brizio, Raffaelo 
 Guidi, and many other Italians, habitually took their 
 inspiration from it. 
 
 Cardinal Barberini, who became pope under the 
 title of Urban VI I L, patronised engraving, and sug- 
 gested a great number of these futile inventions ; the 
 bees of the Papal armorial bearings fluttered in swarms 
 about these prints, which were both harsh and wanting 
 in individuality. Cornelius Cort, Franz Villamene, 
 Jo. Fred. Greuter, and Theodore Cruger, arrived from 
 Germany ; Philip Thomassin, with a few competitors, 
 hastened from France ; and all, German and French 
 alike, yielding tothegeneral fascination, eagerly strove 
 
ENGRA VING IN 1TAL Y. 71 
 
 to adopt the style of the most fashionable Roman 
 artists. It is too certain that all the plates executed in 
 Italy in the seventeenth century were so much alike that 
 they might have been attributed to the same artists, 
 had not their authors been careful to sign them. These 
 engravers took their inspiration from late painters of 
 Michael Angelo's school, and it is well known that 
 this once admirable school, whose chief had executed 
 such beautiful works, had already suffered from ex- 
 aggeration of style under Baccio Bandinelli. In the 
 works of the second generation of the disciples of the 
 painter of the Sistine Chapel the style became alto- 
 gether false, coarse, and bombastic. 
 
 Amongst the artists of the Roman school who 
 remain to be named we must not forget Pietro Santo 
 Bartoli, who with his skilful needle, seconded by his 
 burin, reproduced a great number of bas-reliefs and 
 antique statues. Winckelmann advised young people 
 anxious to form a good idea of works of antiquity, to 
 consult the engravings of Pietro Santo Bartoli, and 
 this advice from the famous historian of art surely 
 speaks well for the artist's works. But we are more 
 exacting now than formerly. In our day the means 
 of reproduction have attained such high excellence 
 that we are not disposed to give Bartoli such un- 
 limited admiration. His engravings after the Trajan 
 column, for instance, whilst giving valuable informa- 
 tion about the costumes and arms of the ancients, fail 
 to give a correct idea of the figures of this monument. 
 
72 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 The casts in the museum of the Louvre, which enable 
 us to compare the copy with the original, compel us 
 to be somewhat reserved. But in any case, Pietro 
 Santo Bartoli was one of the first, if not to copy 
 exactly the true character of ancient monuments, at 
 least to devote his talent to them almost exclusively, 
 and it was by aid of his engravings almost as much 
 as by the works themselves, that Grecian and Roman 
 art were made known to most of the artists born at 
 the beginning of this century. 
 
 At the end of the eighteenth century, when engra- 
 ving seemed almost extinct in the rest of Italy, it still 
 survived in Rome. Two artists of about equal talent, 
 Domenico Cunego and Antonio Capellani, applied 
 themselves to reproducing several works by Michael 
 Angelo, which could only be known at Rome. 
 Domenico was born at Verona in 1727, and at first 
 devoted himself to painting ; he worked with Fran- 
 cesco Ferrari ; then, after studying the first principles of 
 engraving in Germany he established himself in Rome, 
 and it was there that he became so enamoured of 
 Michael Angelo, that he set himself to engrave the 
 paintings in the Sistine Chapel ; Antonio Capellani 
 joined him in this enterprise. Born at Venice about 
 1740, he had left his home to settle at Rome, and he 
 engraved 'The Creation of Woman,' and 'Adam and 
 Eve driven from the Garden of Eden.' Neither of 
 these artists drew with sufficient accuracy to copy these 
 almost sublime works. They fell far short of their 
 
ENGRA VING IN ITAL Y. 73 
 
 models, their engravings are heavy and wanting in 
 ease, and give but a very inadequate idea of the 
 originals, and the principal merit of these artists is 
 that they rendered works which no one had hitherto 
 attempted to copy. 
 
 Here must close the history of engraving in Italy. 
 To pursue our inquiry further would be to exceed the 
 limits of our plan. We could doubtless further notice 
 the ultra-picturesque works of the brothers Piranesi, 
 and refer to artists nearer our own time, who for a 
 moment appeared likely to revive the art of engrav- 
 ing in Italy. Raphael Morghen, Paolo Toschi, and 
 Giuseppe Longhi, enjoyed a considerable reputation at 
 the beginning of this century, which was justified to a 
 certain extent by their skill in handling the graver. 
 But these artists, working almost entirely at pictures 
 produced two centuries before, could not identify them- 
 selves with their models, and therefore remained 
 inferior to them. In occupying ourselves only with 
 the masters of art, and mentioning the names of those 
 artists who at different times drew upon themselves 
 the attention of men of taste, and were remarkable 
 for great originality, we have perhaps given a better 
 notion of the grandeur of Italian art than we should 
 have done had we spoken of every one and meted out 
 to each a portion of praise or blame. 
 
74 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN SPAIN. 
 Giuseppe Ribera and Francesco Goya. 
 
 IT is almost impossible to write the history of en- 
 graving in Spain. Scarcely anything is known 
 of the art of this country beyond its own shores, and 
 native historians, or those who resided long enough in 
 Spain to make the national art the object of their 
 studies, agree in stating that engraving was very 
 little practised and still less encouraged. We know 
 that some anonymous prints are attributed to Velas-' 
 quez and Murillo ; they do recall the style of these 
 masters, and are evidently reproductions of their pic- 
 tures, but we cannot name their authors with any 
 certainty. Without conclusive proofs all conjectures 
 are valueless. Ribera is the only celebrated painter 
 born in Spain whom we know to have been also a 
 line-engraver. His style is easy, and the colouring of 
 
Fig. 6. A Poet. Engraved by GIUSEPPE RIBERA. 
 
TUTI7ERSIT7] 
 
ENGRA VING IN SPAIN. 77 
 
 his engravings, like that of his paintings, is somewhat 
 harsh ; his prints deserve the esteem in which they 
 are generally held ; ' Poetry ' and ' The Martyrdom 
 of St. Bartholomew,' Ribera's best works, would be 
 an honour to any school. 
 
 But after that of Ribera we find no famous name 
 until the beginning of the seventeenth century ; the 
 plates by Salvador Carmona, Manuel Esquivel, Fran- 
 cesco Muntaner and other artists equally inferior in 
 talent are not enough to represent a school. These 
 engravers, who confined themselves to the burin, gene- 
 rally copied valueless works, which they reproduced 
 barrenly and without beauty, and if they did turn to 
 a master, like Velasquez, they failed to render the 
 grandeur and harmonious colouring of that great 
 master's works. To find a man of real originality 
 and skill, therefore, we must pass on to Francesco 
 Goya, the only engraver of whom Spain may be justly 
 proud. He was born at Fuendetolos, in Aragon, on 
 the 3<Dth of March, 1746, and died at Bordeaux on 
 the 1 6th of April, 1828. He was in turn a painter, 
 an engraver, and a lithographer. His latest historian, 
 M. Charles Yriarte, has reviewed his frescoes, his genre 
 paintings, portraits, and engravings, in a large volume. 
 They are very numerous, but judging from those we 
 have seen and the copies in Yriarte's book, we think 
 Goya's reputation is enhanced when he is studied 
 through his engravings, for then his skill cannot be 
 denied, whereas we are of opinion that the merits of 
 
78 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 many of his portraits and paintings, especially those 
 of sacred subjects, have been much exaggerated.* 
 They are remarkable for a certain sombre harmony of 
 tint, but the drawing of his figures is careless, and the 
 artist does not value beauty highly enough, he seems 
 voluntarily to set it aside, and to delight in horrible 
 scenes. His engravings show the same tendencies, 
 but they call up our admiration by the skill of the 
 execution ; and the truthfulness of the action depicted 
 in some measure rewards one for what is repulsive 
 and gloomy in the subjects chosen. Goya is the 
 painter of passion and of life, he is a sceptic, a mocker 
 never satisfied. He has constituted himself the 
 apostle of liberty for his oppressed country, and he is 
 entirely engrossed with this one idea. The awful 
 massacres at which he invites us to look, are the work 
 of despotism, and, as interpreted by his imagina- 
 tion, they appear more horrible than they were in 
 reality. Fancy plays a large part in Goya's en- 
 gravings, and the magic charm of chiaroscuro is 
 called in to conceal incorrectness of drawing and pal- 
 pable errors of taste. This engraver's special task, 
 the skilful combination of aquatint and etching, is 
 also full of interest. Goya was pre-eminently suc- 
 cessful in this method of engraving which no artist 
 
 * The greater number of engravings published by Goya were 
 after his own drawings, but some few reproduce portraits by 
 Velasquez. The latter, entirely etched, give a very good idea 
 of the original paintings. 
 
Fig. 7. The Condemned. An etching by FRANCISCO GOYA. 
 
ENGRA VING IN SPAIN. Si 
 
 before his time had employed, and he is the only 
 artist of genius of a distinctively Spanish character. 
 He will be remembered also because he introduced a 
 process of engraving which Rembrandt himself, the 
 master of chiaroscuro, the prince of etchers, had fore- 
 seen but not employed. 
 
 G 
 
82 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN THE LOW COUNTRIES. 
 
 Engravers on Wood in the i$th Century. Early Engravers on 
 Metal Holland : Rembrandt, Ruysdael, and Paul Potter 
 Belgium : Rubens, Bolswert, Paul Pontius and Anthony 
 Vandyck. 
 
 IT is difficult to abstain from studying the art of 
 Flanders and that of Holland together. From 
 the first these two countries had interests in common : 
 art assumed the same character for a time, and did 
 not attain to separate and distinct importance until 
 the middle of the seventeenth century, when Rem- 
 brandt on one side, and Rubens on the other, founded 
 and directed a school, each in his respective country. 
 
 The question as to whether the first wood en- 
 gravings were printed in Germany or the Low Coun- 
 tries has always been the subject of earnest debate. 
 Strange to say, the history of the origin of engraving, 
 which is intimately connected with that of printing, 
 becomes more and more obscure in proportion to the 
 
, THE LOW COUNTRIES. 83 
 
 number of fresh documents discovered. Those who 
 bring out these documents, with a date throwing back 
 the invention for a few years, are generally too much 
 blinded by vanity to be much enlightened by them. 
 The greater number of the historians of engraving, 
 who are Germans at heart and by birth, are unwilling 
 to relinquish for their country the honour of the in- 
 vention of engraving, but the Dutch energetically 
 maintain a right of priority, which we consider worthy 
 of belief. Let us not forget to add, that the Italians, 
 not without? pride, bring documents to support similar 
 pretensions ; and that the French have attempted, 
 but it must be owned without any success, to take a 
 place among the first inventors of this art. 
 
 Engraving on Wood. We think that it was in the 
 Low Countries, at Haarlem, that the 'Speculum 
 Humanae Salvationis' first appeared. It is a religious 
 work ornamented with woodcuts, which show some 
 knowledge of art, and testify much more to a desire 
 for good composition than the single pictures pre- 
 viously published. Four editions of this work, all 
 without date, the name of the printer, or of the town 
 in which they were published, succeeded each other. 
 Two, however, are in Dutch, and two in Latin, and 
 certain scholars, good judges in such matters, think 
 the Dutch dialect the same as that spoken in the Low 
 Countries about the close of the fourteenth century or 
 the beginning of the fifteenth, thereby justifying our 
 opinion of the origin of these books. We look in vain 
 
84 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 in Germany or elsewhere for any former work at all 
 equal to the ' Speculum Humanae Salvationist or the 
 ' Biblia Pauperum.' In them the influence of the Van 
 Eycks is manifest, the style resembles theirs in every 
 particular. The authority of the Van Eycks was greater 
 than that of any painter until the beginning of the 
 fifteenth century. This fact must be borne in mind, 
 for a school does not really exist until it produces a 
 work worthy of admiration or interest ; in art, as in 
 everything else, an invention is not truly useful or 
 praiseworthy until its results are tangible. 
 
 Although compelled to deny to the Germans a 
 glory, in the defence of which they have employed so 
 much patient study, real knowledge, and long re- 
 search, we cannot but acknowledge, that the advan- 
 tage enjoyed by the Low Countries is more than 
 counterbalanced by the important part taken by 
 Germany in the development of engraving, and we 
 must carefully study the art at the head of which 
 stand two such great German masters as Albert Diirer 
 and Martin Schongauer. 
 
 To the Low Countries, then, in addition to the 
 honour of the discovery of printing (subsequently 
 turned to such good account by Gutenberg), belongs 
 also the equal distinction of having produced the first 
 woodcuts worthy of notice. The books quoted above 
 replaced the manuscripts hitherto in use. This was 
 a great boon, for the latter, requiring much careful 
 labour, were very expensive, and of course attainable 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 85 
 
 only by those in easy circumstances, the poor being 
 inevitably compelled to remain in ignorance. It is 
 true that several engravings with short legends at- 
 tached to them were published, but they could not be 
 considered efficient means of education. Printing 
 happily changed this great inequality, and we can 
 understand how useful xylography and typography 
 were to each other when combined. 
 
 The school of painting directed by the Van Eycks, 
 and in which Hans Memling was a pupil, became so 
 famous that a new impulse was given to engraving ; 
 many artists gladly availing themselves of it to mul- 
 tiply the works of these masters. Although not 
 sharing all the resources of painting this art is more 
 directly profitable and does not require such thorough 
 study.* At Amsterdam and Antwerp books were 
 published, which proved the usefulness of the discovery, 
 containing engravings remarkable for clearness of exe- 
 cution and rare truthfulness. There were, indeed, no 
 models to be found elsewhere equal to those that 
 Flemish artists had at their command, and when not 
 copying the master's works literally they could not 
 entirely free themselves from their influence. 
 
 The names of the numerous woodcutters of the 
 fifteenth and the beginning of the sixteenth centuries 
 are unknown, and it is therefore difficult to describe 
 
 * The engravings on wood which appeared in the Low Coun- 
 tries about the I5th century are very numerous. 
 
86 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 their works accurately. All early Flemish engravings 
 were influenced by the style of art in fashion at the 
 court of the Dukes of Burgundy, and the engraved 
 designs on box or pear-tree wood resemble each other 
 too much to admit of classification. The figures are 
 stunted, often deformed, the heads poor, the expres- 
 sions exaggerated ; but the movements are generally 
 justly rendered, and the actual cutting is skilful. 
 Those bearing the monogram LA. separated by a 
 double A. crossed by a V., and attributed to Jacob 
 Cornelisz or John Walter Van Assen, are picturesque 
 and cut with manual dexterity. 
 
 Engraving on Metal. Early engravers on metal in 
 the Low Countries resembled their predecessors, the 
 wood engravers, in their style, if one may apply such 
 a term to these primitive efforts. They were inspired 
 by the same influence, guided by the same mind. An 
 anonymous artist, called, for want of better information, 
 ' The Engraver of 1480,' left a great number of prints. 
 We have examined them in the museum at Amster- 
 dam. The drawing of all exhibits the same inde- 
 cision, but they are well engraved. They are of sacred 
 subjects or gay scenes, and are fair specimens of the 
 art of the period. Designs which were thoroughly 
 worked out by miniature and other painters lost much 
 of their perfection under the hands of line engravers, 
 the movements of the figures became distorted, and 
 sometimes almost grotesque. The Van Eycks and 
 Hans Memling exercised but little influence over ' The 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 87 
 
 Engraver of 1480 ;' he failed, for instance, to give to 
 the face of the Virgin the purity and simplicity in 
 which the masters of the school of Bruges so much 
 delighted He preferred to take his inspiration from 
 the early painters of Cologne, and his style in conse- 
 quence partly resembles that of the school on the 
 borders of the Rhine, but he was thoroughly Dutch 
 in his mode of working on copper. This was his chief 
 merit, his line engravings are fine and of delicate 
 workmanship, and he may have been a goldsmith 
 before he became an engraver of prints. 
 
 Another anonymous artist, known as the ' Master of 
 the Shuttle/ or Zwoll, worked, according to historians, 
 about the same time as the ' Master of 1480,' but his 
 art is more advanced, and his style more decided. 
 The harshness of some of his plates recalls the early 
 school, but others seem to have been produced as late 
 as the middle of the sixteenth century. In ' Christ on 
 the Cross/ for instance, a very large engraving for the 
 age in which it appeared, the Virgin lying insensible 
 at the foot of the cross is not unlike the same figure 
 in a painting by Quentin Matsys, exhibited in the 
 museum of Antwerp. We do not mean to say that 
 the engraver copied the works of the great Antwerp 
 painter born about 1460, but we do think that he 
 was one of his imitators, or was at least aided by 
 his genius. He used the graver skilfully, but he was 
 ignorant of the progress made in other countries. The 
 ' Master of the Shuttle ' probably never left the Low 
 
88 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 Countries, or heard of the engravings of Italy and 
 Germany ; his style is entirely free from foreign 
 influence, and he copied none but compositions of 
 sacred subjects in the style of the school patronized 
 by the Dukes of Burgundy. He certainly would have 
 yielded to the influence of Martin Schongauer, who 
 lived before him, had he studied his works. 
 
 Soon after the artists we have named, a master arose 
 who revived all the peculiarities of the early school, 
 and occupies a large space in the history of art. We 
 allude to Lucas of Ley den, born in 1493. He learnt 
 engraving with an armourer and goldsmith, and gave 
 early proof of talent. In 1 508, that is, at fifteen years 
 of age, he produced his first engraving, ' which, with 
 his succeeding work, presaged a glorious future, al- 
 though his style as yet was timid. Lucas of Leyden 
 paid more attention to perspective than any former 
 engraver. This carefulness of relative proportions 
 added greatly to the apparent size of the space in which 
 the scenes were depicted. Lucas of Leyden knew 
 Albert Dtirer, and when that great artist visited Ant- 
 werp in 1520, exchanged some engravings with him, 
 but he did not borrow so much from the illustrious 
 German as other contemporary artists. He retained 
 his peculiar style of interpreting nature, and his mode 
 of engraving remained unchanged. Experience gave 
 him greater mastery over his tools, but his manner is 
 the same in his earliest and latest works. He took 
 his models from those around him, and did not hesitate 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 89 
 
 to dress the Queen of Sheba, Esther, or Dalilah in the 
 costumes of the richer classes of Holland. His innate 
 sense jof beauty enabled him to realize a glorious ideal 
 far nearer true beauty than that attained by any other 
 master of his time. His ' Ecce Homo ' may be con- 
 sidered one of his chief compositions from an artistic 
 point of view ; but it is also full of another kind of 
 interest The scene is laid in the public square of a 
 Flemish town surrounded by gabled houses, and here, 
 as usual, indifferent to historical truth, the engraver 
 has given the executioners and spectators the costumes 
 of his own age. We are, therefore, indebted to him 
 for a very important record of the manners and cos- 
 tumes of the people of the Netherlands in the first 
 half of the sixteenth century. Lucas of Leyden did 
 not despise homely scenes, although he preferred 
 sacred and exalted subjects. He produced works in 
 which peasants and beggars are the chief actors. 
 One of them, ' The Peasants Travelling,' known as 
 'The Uylenspiegel, is the choicest and most sought 
 after of all his works. This engraving, by an artist 
 devoted to elegance and refinement, led to the pro- 
 duction of an enormous number of prints of beggars 
 and peasants by Teniers, the Ostades, Dusart, and 
 their followers. 
 
 The contemporary engravers of Lucas of Leyden, 
 who worked with him, shared neither his genius nor 
 his style, they shook off his influence, and their works 
 are poor. Dirck van Staren, surnamed the ' Master 
 
9 o 
 
 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 of the Star/ was an exception. He has proved him- 
 self a clever engraver and designer in some engravings 
 signed with the letters D. V., separated by a star, viz., 
 * St. Luke painting the Virgin,' 'The Deluge/ and 'A 
 
 Fig. 8. The Uylenspiegel. Engraved by LUCAS OF LEYDEN. 
 
 Saint kneeling before the Virgin, holding the Infant 
 Jesus in her arms.' The figures are elegant and 
 refined, and rare skill in ornamentation is seen in the 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 91 
 
 decoration of St. Luke's studio. The style resembles 
 that of Lucas of Leyden, and these engravings by 
 the ' Master of the Star ' are worthy of all esteem. 
 
 The ' Master of the Crab ' worked about the same 
 time as the ' Master of the Star ;' he was of an inde- 
 pendent spirit, and troubled himself little about the 
 style of his predecessors. The Madonnas he engraved 
 are ugly and pretentious, exaggerated and badly 
 drawn ; his original figures are stunted and awkward, 
 he drew coarsely, and his work with the graver was 
 unskilful. Indeed, we think his works are famous for 
 their rarity rather than for their merit, which has 
 been much exaggerated. Albert Claas published and 
 signed a number of engravings about the same time 
 as the 'Master of the Crab.' He had not much 
 original power. At first he was content to be a mere 
 copyist. He imitated engravings by Lucas of Leyden, 
 Beham, Aldegrever, and Albert Diirer, and he might 
 be included amongst the petits maitres (the Little 
 Masters), but his style of engraving had not that firm- 
 ness of hand which is seen in the work of the artists 
 included under this title. His figures are not suffi- 
 ciently careful ; he used a sharp graver, and his strokes 
 are very far apart. He did not confine himself to 
 copies alone, but the drawings in which the compo- 
 sition and engraving are both attributed to him are 
 not original enough to render them worthy of esteem ; 
 they betoken facility of execution, but the design is 
 poor, and the expression worthless. 
 
92 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 Cornelius Matzys, another Dutch artist, also partly 
 belongs to the school of the petits maitres. The 
 engravings signed with his monogram, produced 
 between 1537 and 1552, are mostly small. They are 
 also his best ; he is at home and interesting when he 
 represents peasant men and women talking in twos 
 and threes, running together, or telling one another 
 their troubles. Unfortunately he went to Italy, altered 
 his style, and unsuccessfully tried to improve himself 
 by studying Italian masterpieces. ' The Miraculous 
 Draught of Fishes/ a large engraving for him, fell 
 short of his former works ; he could not reproduce 
 Raphael, his rendering of the celebrated cartoon is 
 poor and incorrect. It was the same with all Matzys' 
 engravings produced under Italian influence. This 
 was not surprising, for the new principles, the new 
 traditions, were totally opposed to those of his own 
 land. A Dutchman might give a certain Italian 
 appearance to his works, it is true, but they could 
 scarcely fail to lose in the process. Unfortunately the 
 mania for Italy and the Italian style was universal in 
 the Low Countries in the sixteenth century, and artists 
 did not discover their mistake until the seventeenth 
 century, when Rembrandt and Rubens introduced a 
 new order of things. From the time of Lucas of 
 Leyden until then no work worthy of remark was 
 produced by the artists of Holland or of Flanders. 
 Lambert-Lombard, Adrien Collaert, Martin Hemrs- 
 kerke, Dirck Volkert Curenbert, and a number of 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 93 
 
 others spent the greater part of their lives at Rome, and 
 exhausted their powers in striving after an ideal beyond 
 their reach. The immense number of their works 
 only injured their art. Working for trade, engravers 
 inundated the market with sacred subjects, and devot- 
 ing themselves to allegory, the passion of Italy in her 
 decline, they forgot to care for beauty and truth in 
 their haste to produce fresh impressions. 
 
 It is a relief to turn to works which are the glory 
 of the school of the Netherlands, and prove how 
 powerful it really was. 
 
 Hitherto we have considered Dutch and Flemish 
 art together ; we can no longer do so, for their interests 
 and tendencies cease to be identical. Holland takes 
 an independent position ; a great master is born to 
 her, who abruptly changes the customs of her school, 
 and assumes the lead in art. His name is Rembrandt 
 Van Rhyn. 
 
 Rembrandt was born in 1607.* His birthplace is 
 
 * The date of Rembrandt's birth has been much discussed. 
 The registers of the municipality of Leyden, which alone could 
 have decided the question, are lost for the period under discus- 
 sion. We are, therefore, left to conjectures which rest on the 
 authority of Orlers, the Burgomaster of Leyden, and upon some 
 dated engravings and the artist's marriage certificate, in which 
 he declares himself to be 26 years old on the loth of June, 1634. 
 We here adopt the opinion of M. C. Vosmaer (Rembrandt 
 Harmens van Rijn> ses precurseurs et ses annees cfapprentissage, 
 printed at Hague, 1863, pp. iv.-vi.), who, after examining all the 
 accounts by historians of this master, concludes, although with 
 hesitation, that Rembrandt was born in 1607. 
 
94 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 unknown, but everything seems to prove that he first 
 saw the light in Leyden, where his family had been 
 established for a long time. His father at first in- 
 tended him to study law, and began by making him 
 learn Latin, that he might be prepared to go through 
 the course required at the University of Leyden. But 
 Rembrandt had so great a taste for drawing and 
 painting, that his parents yielded to his wishes, and 
 placed him with Jacob Isaacson van Swanenburg, an 
 artist almost unknown in our time. Rembrandt 
 studied with this painter for three years ; he then 
 attended successively the studios of Peter Lastman 
 and Jacob Pinas. Having learnt the elements of his 
 art from them, he returned to his father's house at 
 Leyden to work alone. He soon gained an extensive 
 reputation, his first engravings and paintings were so 
 good that he received several orders for portraits from 
 Amsterdam. On the 22nd of June, 1634, Rembrandt 
 married a wealthy native of Friesland, Saskia Uilen- 
 burg. By this marriage he had two children, one of 
 whom died very young, and the other, Titus Rem- 
 brandt, followed his father's profession, but without 
 success. After eight years of married life Saskia also 
 died, leaving her entire fortune under her husband's 
 control, on condition that he should give her son a 
 thorough education and allot him a portion on his 
 marriage. 
 
 Rembrandt did not long remain a widower ; there 
 is no authentic record of his second marriage, but the 
 
A iitotype. 
 
 JAN SYLVIUS. 
 
 From the Etching by Rembrandt, 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 95 
 
 registers of Amsterdam prove the birth of two chil- 
 dren some time after Saskia's death. Rembrandt's 
 life, devoted to study, furnishes small material for 
 biography. He seldom left Amsterdam, never went 
 abroad, and found plenty of models of every kind 
 ready to his hand. Rembrandt's works, now so sought 
 after and prized by amateurs, and which are disputed 
 for by museums and public buildings, were not thought 
 much of during his life. In 1656, after the production 
 of his best works, Rembrandt was declared insolvent, 
 and compelled to sell his house, his furniture, his very 
 studio ! This unfortunate occurrence was a terrible 
 blow to the artist. Although he worked hard and 
 produced many masterpieces, amongst others, 'The 
 Trustees of the Draper's Guild/ in the Museum of 
 Amsterdam (1661), he sank more and more into 
 obscurity. The date of his death remained long un- 
 known or was incorrectly reported, and it was not 
 discovered until lately in a document taken from the 
 civil registers of Amsterdam : " Rembrandt was buried 
 in this town on the 8th of October, 1669." 
 
 Rembrandt founded the Dutch school properly so 
 called, and we may add that he completely repre- 
 sents it. He created every variety of subject, and 
 in every style proved himself to be an inimitable 
 artist. In compositions of the highest order, such 
 as 'Jesus Christ healing the Sick,' or 'The Resur- 
 rection of Lazarus,' his magic needle obtained re- 
 sults from etching of which it was not deemed 
 
96 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 capable. This branch of engraving would appear to 
 be suited only to homely subjects, or compositions to 
 be dashed off at one sitting, but Rembrandt's genius 
 raised it to the height of glory, and enabled it to 
 compete successfully with the engraving of history. 
 And when the master turns to domestic scenes, when 
 he leads us to the synagogue, or shows us the sculptor 
 modelling a statuette, or the cook surrounded by 
 her children tossing her cakes in the frying-pan, he 
 gives to these familiar subjects a spirit, a power, a 
 touch of nature, which are irresistibly interesting and 
 attractive. He surpasses every one in his noble 
 and life-like portraits. Jan Lutma, the Burgomaster 
 Six, or Rembrandt himself, will live for ever in 
 the etchings which so faithfully render the wit, the 
 energy, and the singularity of their physiognomies. 
 Rembrandt was also a thorough master of landscape 
 design. Holland has had many great landscape 
 painters, but none represented this artificial country 
 with so much truth as Rembrandt. The boundless 
 horizons of this flat country, the wondrous canals, the 
 windmills, are all given without monotony or exagge- 
 ration ; and so admirably has Rembrandt chosen his 
 point of view and arranged his subjects, that, whilst 
 strictly adhering to truth, he has given an interesting 
 and picturesque appearance to this damp and melan- 
 choly land. Rembrandt had some imitators, but 
 no pupils who followed his example step by step. 
 Too original himself to tolerate servile copying, or to 
 
ir 
 
. 
 
 TT; 
 
 %snSkfife 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 99 
 
 do more than encourage, his unthinking genius could 
 only arouse the ambition of some few engravers to 
 follow up the work he had begun. Thus J. Livens, 
 Ferdinand Bol, and Van Uliet, in attempting to con- 
 form themselves strictly to the examples of this 
 master's style, remained far behind their models, and 
 in the end obtained but a moderate reputation. The 
 inferiority of these artists is seen when, applying them- 
 selves directly to the works of Rembrandt, they sought 
 to reproduce the distinguishing beauties by the process 
 employed by that artist. These three imitators re- 
 peatedly engraved Rembrandt's works, and not with- 
 out talent ; their engravings never show more beauty 
 than when they trod in their illustrious master's foot- 
 steps. As for their own compositions, which they 
 produced on copper, they betray an intention to imi- 
 tate Rembrandt, and at the same time an exaggera- 
 tion in the drawing which spoils the figures ; and 
 though Rembrandt himself, even w,hen drawing com- 
 mon and low phases of life, always remained grand 
 and gave a poetry to the most insignificant subjects, 
 his imitators, less scrupulous because less clever, were 
 not afraid of deviating from truth in the action of 
 their figures which are often frightful. 
 
 We are indebted' to this love of humble subjects, 
 such as beggars and peasants, for a great number of 
 excellent Dutch compositions. The artists who chose 
 this kind of work were evidently painters as well as 
 engravers, and, unlike their predecessors, they did not 
 
ioo ENGRA VI NG IN 
 
 go abroad, but were content with the plentiful models 
 close at hand. Their works are charming because 
 they are true. As their country did not offer types 
 of grandeur in the inhabitants, or varied aspects of 
 beauty in the scenery, they applied themselves to the 
 faithful representation of what really met their eyes. 
 The smoking rooms and taverns to which we are in- 
 troduced by Ostade or Brauwer are full of life and 
 animation. We see that their engraver was at home 
 in them. Adrien Brauwer, of Haarlem, is said to 
 have frequented them too much ; according to some 
 historians he led a life of drunkenness and de- 
 bauchery. He died at the age of thirty-four, leaving 
 some etchings of great delicacy and power. Adrien 
 Van Ostade led a less irregular life, and as an en- 
 graver he takes higher rank. He devoted his excep- 
 tional talent to the home scenes of his native land ; 
 his numerous engravings are delightful on account of 
 the spirit and life, of the figures. Whether gay and 
 joyous, or busy over household cares, his characters 
 do well what they are employed in ; their faces are 
 true, their gestures life-like ; they act, they live, they 
 are full of individuality. Ostade possessed this gift 
 of vivid representation in a great degree ; when he 
 shows us an artist at work in his studio in a tall cap, 
 we distinctly see how the painter's attention is fixed 
 on his work, how carefully he is covering his canvas. 
 
 The imitators of Ostade fell far short of their model. 
 Cornelius Dusart drew heavily, and his ideal is even 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 101 
 
 more insignificant and trivial than that of his contem- 
 poraries. It is strange that the Dutch, so successful 
 with physiognomy, could not represent youth ; their 
 lovers, male and female, are wrinkled and frightfully 
 ugly ; the children playing round their parents are old 
 and clumsy, their attitudes are all that is young about 
 them. These second-rate Dutch artists never so much 
 as dreamt of representing beauty and elegance of 
 form. Cornelius Bega, another pupil of Ostade, imi- 
 tated his master as closely as did Dusart He, too, 
 delighted to represent peasants at table in taverns., gos- 
 siping at the door of an inn, or busied with household 
 cares, but his engravings are wanting in the delicacy 
 which distinguishes those of Ostade. They are harsh, 
 and the faces of his beggars are not always correct. 
 
 We have said that Dutch artists of the seventeenth 
 century did not attempt to make the human figure at 
 all beautiful. To atone for this, a number of artists 
 equally skilful with brush and graver, applied them- 
 selves with the greatest success to the representation 
 of animals in all their beauty and nobility. Of these 
 masters Paul Potter is the most distinguished, and the 
 animals he painted or engraved are grander than any 
 before produced. He idealised his model without 
 compromising truth. His- engraving of the ' Friesland 
 Horse' is bold in execution, and competes with the 
 productions of these schools which were famous for 
 their grandeur. 
 
 Nicolas Berghem was as successful with animals as 
 
102 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 any of his fellow-countrymen. His much-sought-for 
 paintings and engravings are equally delicate, clear, 
 and refined. His compositions in which the animals 
 are better than the figures are set in landscapes 
 designed with great care. He delighted in foliage ; 
 his delicate needle has thrown the light on the right 
 places, the shadows are never confused, the air circu- 
 lates freely, giving life to all it touches. 
 
 Adrian Van der Velde painted both animate and 
 inanimate nature, but he engraved animals only. He 
 had great original talent, and the power and correct- 
 ness of his work recalls the style of Berghem. Theo- 
 dore Stoop was less confined and crowded in his 
 work ; he gave his chief attention to horses, and the 
 figures he introduces are cleverly designed and ar- 
 ranged. Philip Wouvermann has signed but one en- 
 graving. But in this finely caparisoned young horse 
 he has shown with what success he could work at 
 etching. His evident inexperience has not injured 
 the correctness of the forms, and in spite of its soiled 
 appearance this engraving is well worth the attention 
 of amateurs. Karel Dujardin evidently loved the life 
 of the fields. He strictly followed Paul Potter as long 
 as he remained in his native land. He engraved num- 
 bers of animals, illustrating their habits and explain- 
 ing their natures. Some sleep in sheer idleness, 
 stretched on their sides or wallowing in the mud ; 
 others accustomed to work, ruminate peacefully, or 
 browse carelessly upon the grass. Dujardin's en- 
 
gniun 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 105 
 
 graving is clear, the outlines bold and distinct ; he 
 never betrays weariness. One day, under pretence of 
 seeing a friend off who was going to Leghorn, Karel 
 Dujardin set out for Italy. He was so much struck 
 with the skies and landscapes of the Roman Empire, 
 that he deserted animals and became a landscape 
 painter. His works in Italy were large, but the ar- 
 rangement of them is not always good, and the exe- 
 cution is laboured. No wonder the successful Dutch 
 artist found such a complete change of style very 
 difficult, and felt almost intimidated before the gran- 
 deur of the scenery round Rome. 
 
 Other landscape painters followed Karel Dujardin's 
 example, and went to Italy after studying in Holland, 
 but these distant wanderings were less injurious than 
 we should have feared, as the emigrants did not leave 
 their country until they knew enough of their art to 
 be able to profit by the novel instructions they were 
 going to receive. John Both, the most celebrated of 
 them, gained the surname of ' Both of Italy.' He was 
 born at Utrecht in 1610. In company with his brother 
 Andrew Both, with whom he generally worked, he 
 travelled first through France and then through Italy, 
 making a long stay in the latter. It is strange that 
 he learnt to understand Italian art through the works 
 of the well-known French artist Claude Gellee. The 
 influence of the Lorraine master is more evident in 
 his paintings than in his etchings ; in his engravings 
 he addressed himself directly to nature. He truth- 
 
106 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 fully rendered the vast horizons bounded by high 
 mountains and enlivened by large trees and well- 
 known buildings. His art accommodated itself to 
 the peculiarities of different countries, and his style 
 was affected by the beauty of the landscapes he 
 subsequently visited. William of Heusch, a fellow- 
 countryman and disciple of John Both, followed his 
 example and sought his models in Italy. He engraved 
 the scenes of that country very truthfully, and we 
 must not be severe in our criticism, remembering how 
 much he accomplished by means of a process so little 
 fitted to render the grandeur of the scenes he chose. 
 Herman Swanevelt spent the greater part of his life 
 in Italy, and yielded entirely to the influence of 
 Claude Lorraine, addressing himself directly to that 
 master's works. His engravings show this influence, 
 but the execution is cold and monotonous. 
 
 Jacob Ruysdael, the greatest landscape painter of 
 Holland, did not know Italy, and never left his native 
 town, Haarlem. We need not here speak of his talent 
 as a painter, and some of his engravings are quite 
 equal to his pictures. His style is easy, his drawing 
 skilful and decided ; he is pre-eminently successful 
 in rendering trees and foliage ; his work is always 
 clear and distinct. The light is vivid and cleverly 
 distributed, whilst the shadows are rendered with 
 truth and care. The warm colouring of his pictures 
 is reproduced in his engravings. His works are not 
 numerous ; ' The Corn Field/ and the ' Travellers,' 
 
UNIVERSITY 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 109 
 
 are good illustrations of his great and noble genius. 
 The first is an unrivalled work. A simple corn-field 
 shut in by tall trees, the leafy boughs, the tangled 
 shrubs, the gentle breeze, the tender light, even the 
 refreshing fragrance of the country, are all happily 
 and clearly rendered. Anthony Waterloo never left 
 Holland, and was seldom absent from Utrecht, his 
 native place. Unlike most of the artists we have 
 named, he acquired greater reputation as an engraver 
 than as a painter. His fame exceeded his merits. 
 His etchings are monotonous and laboured, and he 
 had recourse to the burin to bring any object, such 
 as the trunk of a tree or a tangled bough, into promi- 
 nence. This practice was new to the Dutch school, 
 and had its disadvantages. It is easy enough to make 
 soft and pleasing strokes with the graver, but they re- 
 tain undue importance when the rest of an etching 
 begins to fade from the worn-out plates. Bad impres- 
 sions are the result, and Waterloo's works were no 
 exceptions. The scenes he represented are of little 
 variety or extent. A corner of a forest with a wind- 
 ing lane, a mill above a torrent, a cottage over- 
 shadowed by a few trees, such are the aspects of 
 nature in which this artist delighted. He never at- 
 tempted to render Holland's characteristic landscapes, 
 its vast horizons, or its boundless plains watered by 
 countless canals. 
 
 The sea shared with the forests, the green hillocks, 
 and the plains of Holland, the enthusiasm of inter- 
 
1 10 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 preters, and Rembrandt, who inaugurated the marine 
 style, was as successful in it as in everything else. 
 Those who followed him were not so fortunate. Louis 
 Backuysen, one of the cleverest Dutch painters, en- 
 graved several sea-pieces with the needle, which are 
 wanting in his usual skill. The effect of the wind 
 on the sea is well given, but his last efforts were too 
 hastily executed, and the figures on the sterns of the 
 vessels are clumsy and incorrect. On canvas Backuy- 
 sen renders eloquently the most majestic aspects of 
 the sea, but on copper he is weak and irresolute. 
 
 Isaiah Van der Velde was not more successful ; he 
 tried to represent seaports crowded with ships, or 
 skaters gliding over the ice ; but the abrupt and harsh 
 hatchings of his needle, crossed by strokes of the 
 graver, most inadequately render the appearance of 
 the sea, the river, or the canal he is drawing. Peter 
 Bout used a very fine needle, and drew charming little 
 villages-washed and shut in by the sea ; but the figures 
 in his sea-pieces want character, and his designs are 
 not well finished Nevertheless, he accomplished some- 
 thing, and his five or six known sea-pieces give a true 
 idea of the appearance of the North Sea. Rene 
 Nooms, now generally known under the name of 
 Zeeman (seaman), was born at Amsterdam about 1612. 
 He was so passionately fond of painting the sea, that 
 he embarked as a simple sailor, and made several 
 voyages in order to study the fickle element in her 
 smiling and angry moods, and to learn the construe- 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. in 
 
 tion of vessels. It is to this special education that 
 his engravings owe the truthfulness so little shared by 
 contemporary works ; and if the gazer does not find 
 in Zeeman's engravings an understanding of effect, or 
 great beauty in the execution, the historian will prize 
 them for their truthfulness and precision, as well as 
 for the information they afford. 
 
 Side by side with the followers of Rembrandt, who 
 produced famous and valuable etchings, arose an 
 equally celebrated school of artists who employed 
 the graver, and left to posterity striking proofs of 
 their talent. We have spoken of the unfortunate ten- 
 dency of beginners to desert their own land for Italy, 
 and especially for Rome, where they learnt of the 
 artists of the decadence, and parodied their works. 
 We have now to consider artists who took a higher 
 tone. They too left their country for a time, but 
 when they had learnt all they could from foreign 
 masters they returned home and devoted the greater 
 part of their existence to reproducing the works of 
 their fellow-countrymen. This school of Dutch line- 
 engravers did not arise till the seventeenth century. 
 After Crispin Van de Pass, who gave to his works a 
 warm and pleasant tint, we find a number of artists 
 who, we may say, used the graver too boldly. At 
 first Henry Goltzius was timid and almost too anxious 
 about delicacy and precision, his small portraits 
 rivalled miniatures, and were equal to the most deli- 
 cate works ever engraved, but as soon as he felt himself 
 
1 1 2 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 master of his instrument, he took an entirely different 
 course, and, recalling Albert Diirer's style, he pub- 
 lished some of the most extravagant prints imagina- 
 tion ever conceived. By means of deep strokes at wide 
 intervals he tried to reproduce works complicated and 
 pedantic, and succeeded too well in literally copying 
 these exaggerated forms, and whilst gaining the repu- 
 tation of being one of the cleverest line-engravers of 
 Holland, he lost that of a correct and skilful designer, 
 which his first works had gained for him. It is to be 
 regretted that he had many imitators. His manner 
 attracted those who were fond of novelty and cared 
 little by what means they attained notoriety. 
 
 Amongst the least intelligent of Goltzius' imitators 
 were John Saenredam and John Miiller. It is impos- 
 sible to exceed their skill in using the needle, or en- 
 graving on copper ; but their very ease of execution 
 led them to delight in terribly distorted forms. Their 
 ambition was to vanquish apparently insurmountable 
 difficulties and they were always absorbed in the 
 desire to show their power. They took their models 
 chiefly from Bartholomew Spranger, the most affec- 
 ted artist of the school. James Matham, another 
 pupil of Goltzius, was not content with his master's 
 lessons. He made a long stay in Italy, and at Rome 
 took counsel with his countryman, Cornelius Bloe- 
 maert. But this new teaching spoilt his originality, 
 although he learnt from it to seek something better 
 than complicated subjects and exaggerated forms : he 
 
Fig. 12. Costume. Engraved by HENRY GOLTZIUS. 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 115 
 
 engraved after Zuccaro, and sometimes even after 
 Raphael and Titian. His prints merely produce with 
 a weary monotony the works of these great masters. 
 His portraits alone, which show careful study of 
 physiognomy, are worthy of notice. Henry Hondius 
 never left the Hague, his native place. For fifty 
 years he superintended a studio there in which many 
 artists were educated. It is not easy to define his 
 manner, it is dry and wanting in grandeur. He 
 had not sufficient talent to give his pupils and the 
 artists he employed for he was rather a publisher 
 than a master-engraver a true impulse ; the prints 
 which bear his name, either as publisher or engraver, 
 are of no particular value. 
 
 After line-engraving had been practised in Holland 
 for a long time, with more or less success, a moment 
 came when this art attained to so considerable a 
 position that neighbouring countries might well have 
 been jealous. In the middle of the seventeenth cen- 
 tury a national school of painting arose entirely under 
 the influence of Rembrandt, and engravers sprung up 
 ready to reproduce the new painters' compositions 
 and their own, and to spread abroad the fame of those 
 who guided them. A Dutchman, Peter Soutman, 
 born at Haarlem about 1580, who attended Rubens' 
 studio, and successfully engraved some of his works, 
 seems to have given the impulse to this new school of 
 engraving. He attracted and won the confidence of 
 young engravers. Jonas Suyderoef entered his studio 
 
1 1 6 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 and borrowed from his master the convenient process 
 of combining line engraving with etching. In this 
 mode of working aquafortis plays a secondary part, 
 being employed merely to prepare the plate and is 
 disused altogether when the graver begins its work. 
 Amongst Jonas Suyderoefs works important on 
 account of the portraits after P. Soutman, Franz 
 Hals, and Rubens, which they contain there is one 
 plate which would alone suffice to render him famous 
 as an artist. We allude to the ' Peace of Munster/ 
 after Gerard Terburg, which contains no less than fifty 
 portraits those of the plenipotentiaries met together 
 to sign the treaty. This grand engraving shows ex- 
 ceptional knowledge of physiognomy, the picture is 
 reproduced with extraordinary exactness, and in this 
 case we may safely assert that the engraver was a 
 worthy rival of the painter. Cornelius Visscher was 
 also a pupil of P. Soutman. His style differs from 
 his master's more than did that of Jonas Suyderoef. 
 From Soutman, it is true, he learnt scrupulously to 
 respect the models before him ; but his mode of re- 
 producing the works he composed or copied was very 
 different. He seldom used aquafortis, but worked on 
 the bare copper with the tool. At first his style was 
 very formal, and his plates resembled the feeblest 
 efforts of a Polish painter, Jeremiah Falck, who spent 
 some time in Holland. His manner, however, rapidly 
 changed as his talent became developed. Visscher 
 engraved the portrait of Peter Scriverius under the 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 117 
 
 direction of Peter Soutman, and he did not fail to 
 bear witness to his master's share in this work, which 
 he signed thus : ' Corn. Visscher sculpsit. P. Soutmanuo 
 dirigente! An act of respect the more praiseworthy, 
 as in this engraving the pupil is already seen to be 
 superior to his master. Visscher's works are too 
 numerous for us to name all the best, it will be better 
 merely to single out those which are universally ad- 
 mired : ' The Ratcatcher ' and ' The Cook ' are worthy 
 of taking first rank in the history of engraving. This 
 artist was still more successful with his portraits ; he 
 excelled in representing flesh, and his works, like his 
 subjects, are of infinite variety. A clear and powerful 
 colourist, a skilful and accurate designer, he knew how 
 to profit by the examples of his predecessors, and his 
 works bear witness to his great admiration for Rem- 
 brandt, Franz Hals, and Van der Heist. 
 
 Cornelius Van Dalen, who followed C. Visscher's 
 instructions, did not handle the graver with equal 
 ease. But in this excellent school he acquired respect 
 for good drawing and knowledge of colouring. The 
 portraits of Alphonse d'Este, of Aretino, and of 
 Boccaccio are considered Cornelius Van Dalen's best 
 works ; they are certainly his simplest. C. Van 
 Dalen required to work from a good model or from 
 nature ; when employed on an inferior composition 
 his want of interest is evident. When he engraved 
 works after Rubens or Flinck, which suited his taste, 
 he rendered the powerful colouring of these masters 
 
Ii8 ENGRAVING IN 
 
 with peculiar skill, and at the same time gave proof 
 of his own great knowledge. But his portraits are his 
 best works. Whether he drew from nature or bor- 
 rowed his model from Gov. Flinck, J. Livens, or other 
 less famous Dutch portrait-painters, his works are 
 remarkable for powerful execution and knowledge of 
 physiognomy. 
 
 Abraham Bloteling also belonged to the school of 
 Cornelius Visscher. He was born at Amsterdam in 
 1634. His works are very numerous and more varied 
 than those of the artists we have named ; and although 
 they do not take first rank, they show that their 
 author had a certain skill in different styles. His 
 etchings are poor with the exception of one master- 
 piece, the portrait of the painter, Gov. Flinck ; but 
 all his portraits are better than his compositions. 
 He employed mezzotint largely and has left many 
 engravings in it. He only attained true superiority 
 when he left his own country for England, and worked 
 at pictures by Sir Peter Lely and other clever portrait- 
 painters. 
 
 At the end of the seventeenth century Dutch art 
 began to decline, or rather it almost entirely disap- 
 peared. Genius became rarer and rarer. We find 
 good workmen it is true, but they were workmen, not 
 artists ; the skill of Rembrandt and his imitators, with 
 Cornelius Visscher at their head, was gone never to 
 return. Romyn de Hooghe engraved a great variety 
 of subjects with surprising rapidity ; battles, ceremo- 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 119 
 
 nials, costumes, portraits, were all rendered by this 
 artist's fertile imagination, but he had no taste and 
 was ignorant of the laws of drawing. John Luyken 
 although far less skilful than Romyn de Hooghe, had 
 also a fertile imagination and rare facility of execu- 
 tion, but his needle served his intellect badly, it was 
 heavy and monotonous, so that his] etchings are dull 
 and without character. James Houbraken strove in 
 vain, during a great part of the eighteenth century, 
 to revive the beautiful style of etchings brought to 
 so high a pitch by Cornelius Visscher and his pupils. 
 His drawing is incorrect, and he only showed great 
 skill in handling the graver. In addition to his nume- 
 rous portraits he produced some clever engravings 
 after C. Troost which represent scenes of local in- 
 terest. 
 
 In the year 1780, the date of the death of Hou- 
 braken, the history of engraving in Holland must end. 
 If we pursued our inquiry further we should have to 
 name a number of inferior artists, and this, we think, 
 would lead to confusion and be unjust to those who 
 really advanced their art, and deserve to be remem- 
 bered. 
 
 We have named Rembrandt as the inaugurator of 
 the Dutch school, and Peter Paul Rubens takes the 
 same position in Flanders. We do not mean to ignore 
 numerous painters who preceded him and took lessons 
 of Van Eyck and Memling ; but we are considering 
 the history of engraving, not of painting, and we think 
 
120 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 we may justly assert that a true school was not founded 
 in Flanders until Rubens gave engravers an aim, and 
 aroused their ambition by his works. The art could 
 not, of course, spring into fame and power at once, and 
 before it made its name known many inferior engravers 
 were at work. The engravings of Wierix are executed 
 with talent, still they do not betoken any great know- 
 ledge, unless we except a few portraits which are 
 finished with great beauty and delicacy. The Sadelers 
 made up for want of skill by great fertility of imagina- 
 tion. Ad. Collaert devoted himself to allegory and 
 sacred subjects ; the compositions of Martin de Vos 
 and Stradan were his chief favourites. Finally, Cor- 
 nelius, Theodore, and Philip Galle excelled the en- 
 gravers we have named ; their early works show great 
 power, but their genius was not fully developed until 
 they came under the influence of Rubens, to whom 
 was reserved the honour of founding the national 
 Flemish school of engraving. 
 
 Peter Paul Rubens was born at Siegen, in May, 
 1577 ; he spent his early years there, and then went 
 to Cologne for a time ; he did not reside at Antwerp 
 with his mother until the year 1588, after the death of 
 his father. When settled in Antwerp, the first care of 
 Maria Pypeling, Rubens' mother, was to obtain a good 
 education for her son. His studies over, Rubens 
 entered the service of the widow of the Count of 
 Lalaing, Margaret of Ligne, as a page. He did not 
 long remain in this, to him, uncongenial position, but 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 121 
 
 obtained his mother's permission to adopt the profes- 
 sion of an artist, for which he had long shown a great 
 inclination. His first master was Tobias Verhaegt, 
 a painter almost unknown now ; he did not remain 
 with him long, but before going to the studio of his 
 true master, Otto Venius, to complete his studies, he 
 was for a time under Adrian Van der Noort. After 
 four years with Venius, Rubens determined to go to 
 Italy. He left Antwerp on the Qth of May, 1600, and 
 visited successively Venice, Mantua, Rome, Genoa, and 
 Milan. He lived by preference at Venice, and during 
 a long stay there, enthusiastically copied paintings by 
 Paul Veronese, Titian, and Tintoretto. It was in 
 Venice, too, that he made friends with a gay young 
 officer of good family, who took him to the court of 
 the Duke of Mantua, Vincenzo da Gonzaga. The 
 duke, who was devoted to literature and the fine arts, 
 liked to be surrounded by the chief authors and 
 painters of the day ; he retained the Flemish artist 
 near him, and entrusted him with the execution of 
 several works. Better still, he discovered that Rubens 
 had the qualities of a courtier as well as those of a 
 great painter, and that he might be more useful than 
 many of those who studied diplomacy as a profession. 
 He was so convinced of this, that when he wished to 
 send some splendid presents to Philip III., king of 
 Spain, he chose Rubens as his ambassador. The 
 painter having proved himself worthy of the confidence 
 reposed in him, received a great reward on his return ; 
 
122 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 the duke gave him permission to go to Rome to study 
 the masterpieces of which the Papal city is full. 
 Rubens lingered some time in Italy, and was thinking 
 of going to France, when sudden tidings reached him 
 at Milan which abruptly ended his wanderings ; his 
 mother was seriously ill and longed to embrace her 
 son before her death. Rubens set out without delay, 
 but his haste availed him nothing, his mother died 
 whilst he was still far from Antwerp. Overcome with 
 grief, he took refuge in the convent of St. Michael, 
 where she was buried, and devoted the leisure hours 
 of this voluntary seclusion to raising a tomb in his 
 mother's honour, the designs for which he supplied 
 himself. He composed the epitaph also, and placed a 
 picture he had painted at Rome beneath the Mauso- 
 leum. When the first sharpness of grief had passed 
 away, Rubens returned to society, and took up his 
 abode in Antwerp, where he had a house built which 
 he embellished with works of art of every description. 
 He now devoted himself entirely to work, and many 
 long years of study; but little occurred worthy of 
 notice. On the I3th of October, 1609, he married 
 Isabella Brandt; in 1620 he went to Paris to paint 
 the Luxembourg Gallery by order of Maria de 
 Medicis. He remained some time in Paris and then 
 returned to Antwerp, which he did not again leave 
 until the death of his wife, when, being unable to 
 continue his art by grief, he accepted a mission en- 
 trusted to him by the Archduke Albert and the 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 123 
 
 Archduchess Isabella. The rest of Rubens' existence 
 was devoted rather to politics than art. He was sent 
 to Spain and England to negotiate peace between the 
 two countries which had been at war with one another 
 for many years. He had occasion to use his brush 
 in these successive missions, as he often explained the 
 object of his mission while taking the portraits of the 
 monarchs to whom he was accredited. He has left 
 many glorious traces of his visit both at Madrid and 
 London. In November 1630, he married again. His 
 second wife was his niece, Helen Fourment, by whom 
 he had five children. Rubens died at Antwerp of an 
 attack of gout on the 3Oth of May, 1640. His funeral 
 was celebrated with very great pomp. In him Flanders 
 not only lost her greatest painter but one of her 
 greatest men. 
 
 Rubens' influence upon engraving was most decided. 
 Not only were his paintings excellent models for the 
 artists who engraved them, but he superintended their 
 works himself, and touched them up with great skill, 
 never allowing a print to be published without his 
 approbation. It is to this constant vigilance, to this 
 self-respect, so to speak, that Rubens owes his immense 
 reputation. Engravings of his works are widely dis- 
 tributed, and give an excellent idea of the painter's 
 genius to those who have not seen the originals. It is 
 worthy of remark, that Rubens' paintings, famous as 
 they are for their life and power, for their harmony of 
 tone and vividness of colouring, offered exceptional 
 
124 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 difficulties to engravers, who have only two colours, 
 black ink and white paper, at their command ; but all. 
 difficulties were surmounted by the great master's 
 untiring supervision ; and engravers, who confined 
 themselves to the burin, brought out copies in all 
 respects worthy of the originals. We are assured that 
 Rubens himself executed some engravings ; but we 
 find it difficult to believe that the plates signed, 
 ' Rubens fecit' l invenif or ' excudit} were really by 
 him. Only one engraving, ' St. Catherine/ can, we 
 think, be attributed to him with any justice. It has 
 qualities of the first order, although the execution is 
 not very superior. When we have studied the works 
 of those who generally copied Rubens on copper, we 
 shall scarcely regret that he did not leave more of his 
 own engravings. 
 
 The most skilful of the artists formed in Rubens' 
 school was Schelte of Bolswert, who was born at Bols- 
 wert, in Friesland, about 1586. With his brother, 
 Boethius of Bolswert, an artist of less talent and inferior 
 reputation, he came to study engraving at Antwerp, 
 where he was a fellow-pupil of Paul Pontius. He was 
 the first who tried to do more than coldly imitate a 
 painting in engraving, he chose as models works full 
 of life and vivid colouring, and tried to express these 
 qualities in his work. He succeeded perfectly. He 
 was a complete master of the process and obtained 
 the most pleasing results by his skilfully disposed 
 strokes. The white paper throws up high lights and 
 
Frg. 13. Saint Catherine. Engraving attributed to P. P. RUBENS. 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 1 27 
 
 the dark portions are admirably given by bold strokes 
 ending in dots. In the works which Bolsweft exe- 
 cuted in the zenith of his powers there is no display of 
 his own personal talent ; he did not parade his skill 
 as a line-engraver, his ambition was something higher ; 
 he aimed to render as faithfully as possible, by a 
 process which could not call in the aid of colour, the 
 works of his contemporaries. He naturally preferred 
 Rubens' paintings, for that master was at the head of 
 his school ; but he was not therefore indifferent to 
 good works by Rubens' pupils. His engravings of 
 ' The Musicians,' after Jordaens, and the ' Drunken 
 Silenus,' after Anthony Vandyck, may rank with his 
 magnificent copies of ' The Assumption,' ' The Mira- 
 culous Draught of Fishes,' and * The Resurrection/ 
 
 Paul Pontius, who worked side by side with Schelte 
 of Bolswert, and shared with him the friendship of 
 Rubens, was almost equally gifted, and reproduced 
 the master's works as successfully. His engraving 
 was plastic and correct ; he rendered the colour and 
 consistency of flesh and the flowing folds of drapery 
 with equal power. Paul Pontius carried the science 
 of chiaroscuro further than any engraver of Rubens' 
 school, and his constant endeavour to give the luminous 
 appearance of paintings in his plates saved him from 
 undue striving after brilliant execution. 
 
 He engraved many of Rubens' pictures ; and ' The 
 Feast of Pentecost,' ' The Assumption,' ' Susannah 
 at the Bath,' 'The Presentation in the Temple,' and 
 
128 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 others, are by no means inferior to Bolswert's best 
 plates ; they have the same knowledge of design and 
 execution, the same conscientious drawing, which 
 neither excludes originality nor fetters the individual 
 imagination. One of the best known and most 
 famous of Paul Pontius' engravings is after the cele- 
 brated picture by Jordaens in the Museum of the 
 Louvre, entitled ' Le Roi Boit,' or ' Le Fete du Roi.' 
 The spirited engraving gives the somewhat coarse 
 colouring of the picture and the life-like expression 
 of the figures with surprising felicity. 
 
 The style of Lucas Vorsterman differs somewhat 
 from that of the preceding artists. His manner of 
 engraving is not so spirited, but it is equally clever ; 
 he reproduced Rubens' pictures by means of the com- 
 bination of many different kinds of work. By varied 
 lines he appropriately rendered the different parts of a 
 picture ; curved and facile strokes give the outlines of 
 the limbs, and draperies are produced by more or less 
 condensed lines, according to the strength of the light 
 upon them. ' Susannah and the Elders,' ' The Ado- 
 ration of the Shepherds,' and several ' Holy Families,' 
 show the great genius of Vorsterman, and prove him 
 to have been one of Rubens' most faithful interpre- 
 ters. His ambition was not contented with producing 
 Rubens' works with fidelity, and therefore he went to 
 England, where he spent eight years in copying paint- 
 ings of another and different style. Whether he turned 
 to Raphael, to Annibale Carracci, or Caravaggio, he 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 1 29 
 
 could not shake off the influence of Rubens. Under 
 his graver, Raphael's outlines lost their exquisite 
 purity and grace, and the figures acquired an appear- 
 ance of good living of which the great Italian master 
 certainly never dreamt. Vorsterman could never shake 
 off the style of the naturalistic school in which he had 
 been reared ; he could not realise the majestic and 
 noble ideal of these masters. He was more at ease 
 with a canvas by Michaelangelo of Caravaggio, ' The 
 Virgin Adored by Two Pilgrims/ the sober colouring 
 of which he faithfully rendered ; but it was a fellow- 
 countryman of his, Anthony Vandyck, who inspired 
 the best engravings he produced in England. 
 
 Peter de Jode, the younger, also belongs to the 
 school of Rubens. He was born at Antwerp in 1606. 
 He studied and worked for a long time with Peter de 
 Jode, the elder ; and in his early works, which were 
 clumsy and inexperienced, he reproduced his father's 
 style. It is not easy to distinguish his first engravings 
 from those of the elder Jode. Peter, the younger, 
 showed no original power until he ceased to work for 
 the publisher Bonenfant, with whom his father had 
 placed him. He then turned to paintings by Rubens, 
 Vandyck, and Jordaens. In his engravings after 
 these masters he shows himself a worthy rival of 
 Bolswert, Paul Pontius, and Lucas Vorsterman. His 
 touch is easy yet powerful, he delights in rich com- 
 binations, and is extremely successful in rendering 
 pictures full of colour on copper. ' The Marriage of 
 
 K 
 
130 ENGRAVING IN 
 
 St. Catherine,' ' The Three Graces/ after Rubens, 
 'St. Augustine/ after Vandyck, and 'The Miracle of 
 St. Martin of Tours/ after Jordaens, place Peter de 
 Jode, the younger, amongst the best engravers of the 
 Flemish school. 
 
 The school which Rubens raised and directed in- 
 cludes many other artists. We have spoken of the 
 most illustrious ; but there are some amongst the 
 second-rate artists of the same time who occasionally 
 most successfully imitated their master. Amongst 
 them was Peter Soutman. Dutch by birth, he crossed 
 the Scheldt, and came to Antwerp to study under 
 Rubens. He r used etching largely, and was chiefly 
 skilful in rendering the delicate figures in his master's 
 works. We will enumerate a few others : Hans 
 Withdceck, who heightened his engravings with tints, 
 and by this method made them look like chiaroscuro 
 on copper ; Cornelius Galle, who engraved ' Judith 
 and Holofernes ' somewhat clumsily ; Andrew Stock, 
 a Dutchman established at Antwerp, whose engraving 
 of the ' Sacrifice of Abraham ' is not equal to the 
 original ; Peter Van Sompel, a pupil of Peter Sout- 
 man, and an expert designer, who, though superior to 
 the others, never mastered the difficulties of repre- 
 senting colour; Michael Natalis, who joined the 
 studio of Cornelius Bloemaert at Rome, where he 
 acquired a frigid and inharmonious style of engraving, 
 which he could not shake off, even when working at 
 paintings by Rubens ; James Matham, a pupil of 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 1 3 1 
 
 Goltzius, who could not free himself from his master's 
 mannerism, and whose engravings, with all their pro- 
 found knowledge of art, failed to give the colouring or 
 symmetry of Rubens' works ; Alexander Voet, who 
 drew incorrectly, but, being a pupil of Paul Pontius, 
 excelled in colouring, and whose engravings after 
 Rubens ('Judith and Holofernes' amongst others) 
 give a fair notion of the originals, although the bold 
 and masterly drawing is wanting. To conclude this 
 list, Christopher Jegher, a German wood-engraver, 
 left his country to establish himself in Flanders. His 
 engravings were noticed by Rubens, who wished to 
 have some of his own works reproduced by this pro- 
 cess. The great master himself drew some designs on 
 wood, and the engraver had only to follow scrupu- 
 lously his outlines and hatchings. The engravings 
 thus executed by Jegher are true fac-similes of Rubens' 
 designs. Sometimes, like the Italians, Jegher imi- 
 tated several tints by means of successive plates, the 
 tinting thus rounding off the outlines ; and to this day 
 these cama/ieux, as they are called, give us with a valu- 
 able exactitude copies of the Flemish painter's designs. 
 The artists who took lessons from Rubens did not, 
 however, confine themselves exclusively to his paint- 
 ings. We have already spoken of engravings after 
 Jordaens, Seghers, and Vandyck, by followers of 
 Rubens. Works of this kind are very numerous ; 
 and Anthony Vandyck's paintings were especially 
 admired and patronised by engravers. 
 
132 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 When considered apart from other painters, Anthony 
 Vandyck is a master of the first order ; his figures 
 are all unrivalled in distinguished character, deli- 
 cacy and elegance, but, as compared with Peter Paul 
 Rubens, he can only take the second place. This is 
 but just ; he came after Rubens, and profited by his 
 example, neither had he the same wonderful creative 
 power as his master. In his portraits, however, Van- 
 dyck is not inferior to Rubens ; he looks at nature 
 from a different point of view, caring, it is true, more 
 for character than grandeur, but then, his works have 
 greater interest for us than those of his master. Let 
 us explain. He was not content merely to look over 
 engravings after his works by Bolswert, Paul Pontius, 
 or Vorsterman, or to superintend engravers ; he used 
 the tools himself, and has left brilliant proofs of his 
 skill in this kind of work. His compositions are not 
 his best works : ' Christ Crowned with Thorns/ and 
 ' Titian and his Mistress/ do not show much talent, his 
 work is laboured, he covered his paper too closely in 
 copying flesh ; but he made up for this in the eighteen 
 portraits which he most delicately and skilfully en- 
 graved with the needle. They are of artists and 
 amateurs, friends of the painter. The features are 
 lifelike and wear their best expression. Vandyck 
 was more successful than any earlier painter in seizing 
 a likeness. After a few impressions had been taken 
 of the portraits which this great master himself drew 
 on copper, they were retouched and completed with 
 
Fig. 14. Portrait of Snyders, an etching, by ANT. VANDYCK. 
 
THE LOW CO UNTRIES. 1 3 5 
 
 the graver by professional engravers ; a uniformity 
 was thus given which fitted them to be included in the 
 series of ' Icones Pictorum/ published successively by 
 Giles Hendricx and Martin Van den Enden. En- 
 graved by L. Vorsterman, Bolswert, Paul Pontius, 
 Peter de Jode, and others, this magnificent series does 
 justice to the genius of Vandyck. There are a 
 hundred personages, all drawn with surprising correct- 
 ness, who appear to be living, thinking, moving beings ; 
 their attitudes are natural and simple, whether pensive 
 or animated, the features reflect the intelligence of the 
 sitter, and the engravers of these portraits have faith- 
 fully rendered the master's work. They gave the 
 spirit, the grace, and even the colouring of the ori- 
 ginals, although they used the graver, which is not so 
 facile an instrument as the needle. 
 
 The example set by Vandyck was followed by 
 many of his contemporaries, and other Flemish painters 
 largely employed etching. They deserve mention, 
 although their talent did not equal Vandyck's. Cor- 
 nelius Schut, a pupil of Rubens, and the most diligent 
 of these engravers, had not very refined taste. He 
 drew heavily, his figures are clumsy and vulgar, his 
 Madonnas and heathen deities are very much alike. 
 The same head surmounts the bust of the Virgin and 
 that of Ceres ; it is not easy to distinguish one from 
 the other. It is the delicate work with the needle 
 which justifies the fame of Cornelius Schut's en- 
 gravings ; he wanted only rather more taste to have 
 
136 ENGRA VING IN 
 
 produced valuable works. Francis Van den Wyn- 
 gaerde, who traded in engravings at Antwerp, and 
 signed a number of good plates of that school, 
 with exc. (excudii) after his name, used the needle 
 also. His manner is not easy to define, for he tried 
 every style, and fell short of his models in all. His 
 ' Holy Family/ after Cornelius Schut, is badly drawn 
 and coldly engraved. The same faults are seen in a 
 'Flight into Egypt/ after John Thomas, a Flemish 
 painter who is now scarcely known, but who succeeded 
 better with etching than most of his contempo- 
 raries. Van den Wyngaerde, who used a very fine 
 needle, engraved several battles, which have the one 
 fault of being too confused. He shows real skill in 
 ' Hercules and the Nemsean Lion/ 'after Rubens, and 
 the ' Portrait of Lucas Vorsterman/ ,after J. Livens ; 
 his style, although still rather clumsy, faithfully 
 renders the manner of these masters. Theodore Van 
 Thulden studied with Rubens, and accompanied his 
 master to Paris when he went to decorate the gallery 
 of Luxembourg. He worked with Rubens at many 
 of his pictures, and left several works at Paris, amongst 
 others, the paintings which filled the choir of the 
 ' Eglise des Mathurins/ since destroyed. These pic- 
 tures represent many episodes in the life of St. John 
 of Matha ; Van Thulden reproduced them himself, 
 and these engravings give a better notion of his talent 
 than those of the l History of Ulysses/ after pictures 
 at Fontainbleau by Nicolo dell' Abbate, which were 
 
THE LOW COUNTRIES. 137 
 
 designed by Primaticcio. We think that these en- 
 gravings have only one good point, they are repro- 
 ductions of compositions which are now lost, but they 
 have none of the characteristic taste of the Italian 
 master. William Panneels, a painter and engraver of 
 Antwerp, also took lessons of Rubens. He engraved 
 so many of his master's works, that he must evidently 
 have admired Rubens extremely ; but his talent did 
 not equal his admiration, and his engravings fell far 
 short of the powerful originals. With an idea of 
 showing his great knowledge of chiaroscuro, he made 
 the most abrupt changes from deep black to clear 
 white ; his engravings, in consequence, were harsh and 
 gloomy, unlike his earlier works, which were either 
 bathed in soft light, or lit up with splendour. 
 
 The Flemish school of engraving declined and 
 finally became extinct, in the hands of these second- 
 rate artists. It attained its highest distinction under 
 Rubens, and disappeared almost entirely in the 
 eighteenth century ; the works produced at that 
 period scarcely merit notice. The constant wars 
 which desolated Flanders were little calculated to 
 encourage artists ; they dispersed abroad, some esta- 
 blished themselves in France, where art was at its 
 greatest height ; and when we treat of the French 
 artists, we shall meet with many engravers from 
 Antwerp. They largely influenced the progress of art 
 in France, and we must carefully note the novelties 
 introduced by foreign masters into that country. 
 
138 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN GERMANY. 
 
 Early Engravers on Wood. Maximilian's Engravers. En- 
 graving on Metal. The Master of 1466, Martin Schongauer 
 and Albert Diirer. 
 
 IT would be useless to resume the discussion as 
 to Germany's right to be considered the first 
 inventor of engraving. Scholars of high position give 
 the best reasons for so many diverse opinions that the 
 question is further from settlement than ever. We 
 will therefore pass it by and confine our attention to 
 works of excellence without caring whether they were 
 of the earliest date or not. We repeat that we con- 
 sider the first specimen of engraving the ' Speculum 
 Humanae Salvationis ' for instance to be the work of 
 some carver of images of the Low Countries ; German 
 historians refuse to give this credit to others, although 
 they will probably agree with us when we say that no 
 wood engravers were equal to the German masters of 
 the end of the fifteenth and the beginning of the six- 
 teenth centuries. 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 139 
 
 The ' St. Christopher ' of 1423 is a good starting 
 point for every discussion ; we shall not do more than 
 glance at it or at the many early anonymous wood- 
 cuts ; passing on to the second half of the fifteenth 
 century before we find real talent in Germany or else- 
 where. Engravings produced before 1450 were mere 
 copies of little talent. We have not forgotten that 
 the ' Biblia Pauperum ' has been attributed with some 
 justice to German artists, and that bibliographers 
 mention primers which were published, and probably, 
 also, composed in Germany ; but, nevertheless, no true 
 artist was born until 1460. Until then wood-engraving, 
 of which we are at the present moment speaking, was 
 under the universal influence of the school of Bruges, 
 and a distinctive German style was scarcely recog- 
 nisable. Pfister is for us the earliest German wood- 
 engraver. He learnt the trade of a printer and engraver 
 from Gutenberg, established himself at Bamberg 
 about 1458, and, out of his private resources, published 
 a number of works mentioned by M. Leon de Laborde 
 in his important work, ' Les Debuts de rimprimerie a 
 Mayence et a Bamberg.' These engravings in early 
 printed works are decidedly coarse and of little talent ; 
 but then they are entirely free from foreign influence, 
 and are interesting to us because thjey decide the origin 
 of wood-engraving at least to have been German. 
 
 Although xylography was quite a new art in Ger- 
 many and elsewhere in the fifteenth century, an 
 immense number of woodcuts were published at this 
 
140 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 period both separately and in printed books. This 
 fertility of production had its disadvantages ; the 
 gifted artists who supplied the designs did not watch 
 their engravers enough, and the work produced did 
 not do justice to the originals. Ugliness and deformity 
 were carried to extremes by these early engravers ; 
 their sole merit indeed was their skill in carving wood. 
 The ' Bible ' of Koburger contains eighty-six cuts of 
 better execution than most of the early engravings ; 
 they are not now thought much of, although some 
 were honoured by being copied for Holbein's Bible, 
 and Albert Diirer borrowed from them for his apoca- 
 lyptic designs. In the stunted figures and the stiff 
 heavy folds of drapery we recognise productions of 
 the German school ; but we are not, therefore, justified 
 in considering all these engravings to be by Michael 
 Wolgemuth and Wilhelm Pleydenwurff, to whom they 
 are attributed by the printer, Koburger, in his preface. 
 Their styles are too diverse and their merits too un- 
 equal to stamp them as the work of two artists only. 
 Wolgemuth and Pleydenwurff may have superintended 
 them, or even have executed some of the more impor- 
 tant plates, but many are unworthy in every respect 
 of artists whose other works have obtained for their 
 authors something closely resembling celebrity. 
 
 Michael Wolgemuth was Albert Diirer's master, and 
 the glory of the pupil is reflected on the teacher. In 
 these days of universal scepticism, people are unwilling 
 to consider Albert Dtirer a wood-engraver; they 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN GERMANY. 141 
 
 attribute to artists working under his supervision the 
 splendid engravings of the ' Apocalypse,' and those of 
 the ' Life of the Virgin,' and the greater number are 
 said to be by Jeremiah Resch, a wood-carver and 
 medallist. Such, at least, is the opinion of a historian 
 of Nuremberg. We must needs bow to the decision 
 of a man whose knowledge cannot be denied ; but we 
 hardly like to exclude these masterly engravings from 
 the list of Albert Diirer's works. If he did not him- 
 self engrave the plates he must have watched over 
 the artists to whom he entrusted them with untiring 
 solicitude, for they never worked better than when 
 interpreting the designs of Germany's greatest painter. 
 Lucas Cranach, born in Saxony about the same 
 time as Albert Diirer, was not uninfluenced by the 
 example of his contemporary. His style, however, is 
 very different ; he cared less for beauty and finish 
 than the master of Nuremberg. The engravers he 
 employed for it is very doubtful whether he himself 
 used the graving tool worked in a more picturesque 
 though less correct style than those who followed 
 Diirer, and the beauty of the designs at which they 
 worked were also of a less exalted type. Lucas 
 Cranach was an intimate friend of Luther, and enthu- 
 siastically adopted the principles of the Reformation. 
 He painted portraits of Luther and his wife, of Melanc- 
 thon, and Frederick the Wise ; he placed his talent at 
 the service of the new religion, and illustrated with 
 engravings the outspoken pamphlets of the Reformer. 
 
142 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 In his works we meet with many attacks on the 
 papacy. He was full of zeal for the new religion, and 
 his crude way of treating Biblical subjects proves how 
 prejudiced he was, and that art was not his only 
 occupation. The wood-engravers who reproduced his 
 designs aimed at an exact copy, they avoided cross- 
 hatchings, and simplified their work as much as pos- 
 sible ; indeed they sacrificed most unselfishly their 
 own originality to that of their master. 
 
 At the beginning of the sixteenth century a new 
 impulse was given to wood-engraving. The Emperor 
 Maximilian entrusted to the best artists of Germany 
 four works which were to immortalise his glory, and 
 in the composition of which he himself took a part. 
 ' The Wise King ' (' Der Weisse Kcenig ') contains a 
 number of woodcuts designed by Hans Burgmair, 
 and engraved by several artists of different ability. 
 The ' Theuerdanck/ a moral and allegorical poem by 
 the Emperor Maximilian and his secretary, Melchior 
 Pfintzing, is illustrated by engravings, the designs of 
 which are attributed to Hans Schauflein. The most 
 important of these works, and that which most con- 
 tributed to the sovereign's glory, was almost entirely 
 confided to Hans Burgmair, who proved himself 
 worthy of his great commission. To him we are also 
 indebted for the male and female ' Saints of the 
 Imperial Family/ which are equal in beauty and im- 
 portance to the engravings mentioned above. The 
 death of Maximilian interrupted these noble works, 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 143 
 
 various difficulties prevented their immediate publica- 
 tion, and for many years only rare specimens were 
 known of the ' Triumph of Maximilian/ and of the 
 'Saints of the Imperial Family.' Later, a lucky acci- 
 dent led to the discovery of the original blocks, which 
 had happily not been entirely destroyed by worms. 
 This discovery was followed by another. At the back 
 of the original engravings the names of the engravers 
 were found. This was most fortunate. Thanks to 
 these inscriptions, we can name the skilful artists who 
 interpreted the designs of the masters employed by 
 Maximilian. They were Jeremiah Resch, Jan of Bonn, 
 Cornelius Liefrinck, Wilhelm Liefrinck, Alexis Lindt, 
 Josse of Negker, Vincent Pfarkecher, James Rupp, 
 Jan Taberith, Hans Franck, and Saint - German. 
 These well-authenticated names of engravers of the 
 sixteenth century are of assistance even now in the 
 deciphering of monograms, and they throw a light on 
 the eventful history of the origin of engraving in 
 Germany. 
 
 Hans Baldung Grim was born in Swabia in 1475, 
 and died at Strasburg in 1552. He worked under 
 Albert Diirer. Jackson tells us, in his 'Treatise on 
 Wood-Engraving/ that the pupil's reverence for his 
 master was so great that he preserved a lock of 
 Diirer's hair as a precious relic all his life. This re- 
 spect was still more evident in the designs he caused 
 to be engraved. His style much resembled Diirer's, 
 but it was exaggerated ; and Grim seems to have had 
 
144 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 an unfortunate affection for ugliness when left to his 
 own devices ; he invented stunted figures, grinning 
 heads, and unnatural movements, which were only too 
 literally rendered by his engravers. Baldung Griin 
 was a painter and a designer, but his pictures are not 
 now highly valued, although his master thought well 
 enough of them to offer one to Joachim Patenier. 
 They are confounded at present amongst the innume- 
 rable anonymous paintings brought to light by the 
 researches of enthusiasts. 
 
 Hans Ulrich Vaechtlein, also known by the name 
 of the ' Master of the Crossed Staves/ or of the ' Pil- 
 grim,' worked about the same time as Baldung Griin. 
 The date of his birth is unknown, but M. Loedel, who 
 has devoted much study to this artist, thinks his life 
 was spent at Strasburg. A skilful and well-improved 
 artist, he is in Germany considered the inventor of 
 engraving en camaleu. His valuable and rare plates 
 are remarkable for the skill of their execution, and for 
 an exactness of design which is less exclusively Teu- 
 tonic in style than that of most of his contemporaries. 
 Eleven of his works are known which show that he 
 was not indifferent to Albert Durer's works, but they 
 are famous rather for cleverness of style than for 
 inventive power. 
 
 We have not nearly exhausted the list of German 
 wood-engravers. In addition to anonymous artists, 
 and those known only by their monograms, there are 
 many who merit notice. It is true that among trios*, 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 145 
 
 we are about to name, Jost Amman, Henry Alde- 
 grever, Albrecht Altdorfer, Hans Sebald Beham, 
 Virgilius Solis, or Daniel Hoffper did more as copper- 
 plate than as wood engravers, and, as we shall have to 
 allude to them later, we will now close our notice of 
 German wood-engravers. We must, however, pause 
 for one moment at Bale, where a great master was 
 born, and where also numerous very clever wood- 
 engravers exercised their craft. 
 
 Urs Graf, who worked at the beginning of the six- 
 teenth century, died at Bale in 1530. He designed a 
 great number of vignettes for wood-engravers which 
 were of no great imagination or refinement. He was 
 slightly influenced by Martin Schongauer, whose 
 school he attended for a time, but he did not care 
 enough for grandeur of style, and always copied that 
 master's feeblest works. He is almost the only known 
 artist of the numbers who were born at Bale and pub- 
 lished their works in that city, but he took no part in 
 the revival of art which was going on under his eyes, 
 and which was, so to speak, completed by Hans 
 Holbein the younger. 
 
 It is generally believed that Hans Holbein was 
 born at Bale about 1498. He was fortunate enough 
 to have a wood-engraver beside him who reproduced 
 almost all his works, and spread abroad his fame. Both 
 as a painter and designer Holbein has left a great 
 name. For a long time the numerous engravings on 
 tc?cle-pages, head-lines, and tail-pieces in books printed 
 
 L 
 
146 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 at Bale were supposed to have been designed and 
 engraved by Hans Holbein. A monogram of * H. L.' 
 somewhat puzzled the critics, but it would have been 
 passed over had not an unexpected circumstance re- 
 vealed to the clear-sighted an alphabet generally 
 attributed to Holbein, with this remark accompany- 
 ing it : ' Hans Lutzelburger, Formschneider, genant 
 Franck/ which gave the honour which was his due to 
 Hans Lutzelburger, the real author. Although this 
 artist succeeded better with Holbein's designs than 
 any others, he did not confine himself to them. He 
 was called by the Abbe Zani "the prince of wood- 
 engravers." Mariette, so good a judge of engraving, 
 says, in his manuscript notes, that it is impossible to 
 admire sufficiently the delicacy of his work and the 
 fineness and spirit of his touch. " I think," he says, 
 " that Holbein's designs, which were not too well 
 finished, needed the completeness given to them by 
 this artist, who deserves the esteem in which he is 
 held by the publisher of Lyons. His name, which 
 deserves to be transmitted to posterity, remains in~ 
 oblivion, but his initials, H. L., are seen on the lower 
 part of a bed on which reclines a young woman at the 
 point of death." This name, unknown to the scholar 
 Mariette, is no longer a mystery. Hans Lutzelburger 
 is certainly the author of the * Dance of Death ' (1538), 
 and of ' The Old and New Testament ' (' Icones Histo- 
 riarum Veteris Testamenti ' ; Lyons ; Jean Frellon ; 
 1547). His powerful and facile graver rendered these 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 
 
 147 
 
 compositions by Holbein with extreme delicacy. They 
 are small if the size be measured, but large and grand 
 in conception and thought. Certain of his subjects 
 which might be contained within the surface of a die, 
 if executed on a large scale, would lose nothing of 
 their merit, so well balanced is the general composi- 
 
 Fig. 15. Engraved from Holbein's Dance of Death, by H. LUTZELBURGER. 
 
 tion, so careful and accurate the design of the figures. 
 The talent of Lutzelburger was shown in the power 
 with which he interpreted the master's designs on 
 wood in a very limited space by means of the skilful 
 disposition of his strokes. Many other artists repro- 
 duced Holbein's works, but none whose works we have 
 
148 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 seen, with the success of Lutzelburger ; their style is 
 heavy and exaggerated, and they missed the power 
 and life of the master's compositions. 
 
 Engraving on Metal. If, since the Abbe Zani's 
 discovery, Germany's pretensions to the invention of 
 engraving on metal have been overthrown, we must not 
 deny the part the Germans took in the early history of 
 this art because we refuse to consider them its inven- 
 tors. About the same time that great works of art 
 appeared at Florence, in 1452, a number of engravings 
 were published on the other side of the Rhine. Many 
 of the anonymous plates brought out by the German 
 school appear, by the roughness of the drawing and 
 imperfectness of execution, to be of a very ancient 
 date. After examining these specimens of an art in 
 its infancy we do not hesitate to assert, though we 
 can give no formal reasons, that the means of taking 
 impressions on paper from engraved metal was dis- 
 covered simultaneously in Italy and Germany. Italy, 
 as having produced the first work of genius by means 
 of Maso Finiguerra, must take the precedence ; but 
 Germany followed closely in her steps, and soon gave 
 birth to an artist of great talent, whose name, alas, is 
 unknown. He is generally called the " Master of 
 1466." Amongst the many anonymous artists who 
 preceded this engraver, M. Duchesne considers the 
 ' Master of the Streamers ' to be the author of a few 
 plates which, though roughly drawn, are engraved in 
 a peculiar manner, and much sought for on account of 
 
Fig. 16. Samson and the Lion. Engraving of the MASTER of 1466. 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN GERM A NY. 151 
 
 their archaic style. The figures in this unknown 
 artist's works are covered with imperceptible strokes 
 which appear to have been obtained with a pointed 
 instrument, and not with a cutting one. The metal 
 must have been very soft ; it is rather fretted than 
 hollowed out. It does not appear to have been printed 
 from ; indeed, neither the metal nor the small quantity 
 of ink spread upon it could have borne much pressure- 
 There is one important fact in favour of our opinion 
 that impressions were obtained by friction ; there are 
 no marks made by the plate in any part of these 
 engravings, and we have seen some of the proofs by 
 this anonymous artist which are in a sufficiently per- 
 fect condition to have shown the marks of the edges 
 of the metal had they undergone much pressure. 
 From this we may conclude that the ' Master of the 
 Streamers ' (so named on account of the ribbons 
 covered with legends on all his figures) did not know 
 all the resources of his art, and may, therefore, be con- 
 sidered one of the earliest engravers of the German 
 school. 
 
 Another anonymous artist whose engravings, signed 
 E. S., with the date 1466 and 1467, are very nume- 
 rous, is justly called a Master. He was wonderfully 
 expert with the graver, and although the drawing of 
 his varied and well-conceived compositions is not 
 always correct, it is easy and expressive. 'The 
 Adoration of the Magi ' forcibly reminds us of one of 
 the justly admired miniatures of the preceding century. 
 
152 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 The " Master of 1466 " made the limbs of his figures 
 too attenuated and thin, but when he had to design a 
 piece of jewelry, a paten, or a branch of ornamental 
 foliage, he was in his element and produced tasteful and 
 graceful compositions. He was a thoroughly Gothic 
 artist his ideal of beauty was different from ours, 
 different from that of the early Italians ; with him 
 grandeur of form and design were secondary to justice 
 of expression and simplicity of feeling. In this he 
 resembled the extraordinary artists too long depre- 
 ciated, who built Strasburg Cathedral, and other 
 superb monuments of the Middle Ages. Like them, 
 he understood the disposition of ornament, and he 
 treated the human figure with a simplicity not with- 
 out majesty. The heads, it is true, are too large, the 
 hands and feet too small, the folds of drapery too 
 irregular, recalling the wood carvings of his pre- 
 decessors ; but art requires something more than a 
 literal representation of reality, she requires to give 
 expression to an idea, to a sentiment, and from this 
 point of view the " Master of 1466 " deserves all 
 praise, for he was the first German engraver who 
 devoted his talent to rendering feeling and expression. 
 Martin Schongauer almost immediately followed 
 the " Master of 1466." He may be considered the 
 father of the German school, so great was his influence 
 over it. He is now justly famous ; but after being 
 honoured in his own age to such an extent, that un- 
 scrupulous publishers did not hesitate to place his name 
 
Autotype. 
 
 THE FLIGHT INTO EGYPT. 
 From the Engraving by Martin Schongauer. 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 153 
 
 under works by others to enhance their value in the 
 eyes of inexperienced amateurs. He was classed 
 during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, with 
 all his contemporaries, amongst those Gothic artists 
 in whom even well-informed historians recognised no 
 talent. To this unfortunate injustice is due the loss 
 of many paintings, which, not being sought for, as 
 their merits deserved, were damaged or destroyed. 
 And when at last modern Criticism, with better judg- 
 ment, turned to these leading masters, she was in a 
 dilemma, for the long despised authentic specimens of 
 early art, and important documents relating to their 
 authors, had disappeared ; so that we do not even 
 know when and where Martin Schongauer was born. 
 
 Aided by some signed and dated works, we think 
 we may consider 1420 about the time of his birth. 
 His family, natives of Strasburg, say he was born 
 there ; some authors, finding traces of his living at 
 Ulm, call that his birthplace ; but the greater number 
 agree in saying that he first saw the light at Colmar. 
 He certainly lived there for a long time, and produced 
 many paintings in the latter town ; and he died on the 
 day of the Purification, 1488, as proved by the certifi- 
 cate of burial in the registers of the parish of St. 
 Martin of Colmar, a fac-simile of which has been 
 recently published. Although we cannot write the 
 biography of Martin Schongauer, his authentic en- 
 gravings enable us justly to appreciate his genius. 
 He evidently knew and was influenced by the engrav- 
 
154 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 ings of the "Master of 1466," but he was a more 
 skilful designer, and although the limbs of many of 
 his figures are out of proportion, some of the extremi- 
 ties being too small, and in others enormous feet sup- 
 
 Fig. 17. The Infant Jesus. Engraved by MARTIN SCHONGAUER. 
 
 porting small bodies, he invented and engraved some 
 very different compositions. One justly celebrated 
 engraving, ' The Bearing of the Cross/ was honoured 
 by Raphael's notice, and considered worthy of study 
 by him. ' The Temptation of St. Anthony/ copied, 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERM A NY. 155 
 
 according to an old tradition, by Michael Angelo, and 
 ' The Conversion of St. Paul/ are works unrivalled by 
 any of the German school. Besides these justly 
 famous engravings, Martin Schongauer produced 
 several excellent compositions. The face of the Virgin 
 in his ' Annunciation/ a work of small dimensions, 
 wears a sweet and tender expression which is almost 
 beautiful, and there is a grace about the head of the 
 celestial messenger, reminding us of the Milanese school. 
 In the ' Flight into Egypt/ Martin Schongauer's best 
 work, as we think, the Virgin clasping the divine 
 infant in her arms, is passing, riding on an ass, beneath 
 a palm-tree covered with angels, and St. Joseph is 
 gathering some dates from the tree. This ingenious 
 composition is remarkable for the evident joy with 
 which the Virgin embraces her Son, rescued from the 
 wrath of Herod and adored by angels. It was in such 
 touching subjects that all the Gothic artists excelled. 
 They had faith, and their faith determined, enlightened, 
 and ennobled their ambition. How many works bear 
 charming witness to this ! We might name many 
 engravings by Schongauer, as remarkable for feeling 
 as for successful execution : ' The Death of the 
 Virgin/ ' The Wise and Foolish Virgins/ ' The Sym- 
 bols of the Four Evangelists/ 'Jesus Christ crowning 
 the Virgin/ and others, are works of high excellence. 
 In them all the artfst's power of invention, his know- 
 ledge of drawing and skill in engraving, are clearly 
 manifested. 
 
156 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 But the great German artist did not devote himself 
 entirely to exalted subjects, he also engraved some 
 homely scenes, such as the ' Departure for the Mar- 
 ket/ known up to the i/th century as the ' Uylen- 
 spiegel,' because it was like an engraving of that name 
 by Lucas of Leyden, and * The Peasants ' playing or 
 wrestling together. He gave brilliant proof also of 
 his powers as an inventor, and engraver in design 
 for jewelry or ornaments. It is the glory of Schon- 
 gauer, that surrounded as he was by artists absorbed 
 in their love of literal truth, he was able, in his artistic 
 compositions, to realize an ideal beauty of a noble and 
 elevated order. His right to the title of " Master of 
 German Art " is indisputable. His works were admired 
 by his successors, and influenced them strongly even 
 when they were not actually copying them. 
 
 We consider that the artists who came after Martin 
 Schongauer enjoy greater renown than they deserve. 
 Albert Glockenton has merely coarsely and inade- 
 quately reproduced the master's engravings, robbing 
 them of their exquisite simplicity and their graceful 
 charm. He also executed a few plates from designs 
 of his own, but they are without originality, and 
 although the drawing is correct the engraving is always 
 harsh. Israel Van Mecken owes his fame rather to 
 the quantity than the quality of the engravings bearing 
 his name. We are glad to suppose that the author of 
 these plates was as much a print-seller as an artist. 
 The style of more than one of these engravings is 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 157 
 
 earlier than its execution, and perhaps the plates 
 being dimmed by the first printings, were retouched in 
 Mecken's studio, and there received the name they bear. 
 
 All the engravings which were at all celebrated in 
 Van Mecken's time, were copied in his studio. The 
 'Paten' of the "Master of 1466," the ' Bearing of the 
 Cross, and the 'St. Anthony,' by Martin Schongauer, 
 ' The Three Graces,' by Albert Durer, served as 
 models to his pupils ; their copies, however, were so 
 rough as to be of little value, they reproduced neither 
 the masterly boldness of the drawing, nor the skill of 
 the original engravings. In default of artistic power, 
 we own, however, that some of the rarer works pro- 
 duced in Van Mecken's studio, are valuable on account 
 of the interesting information they contain on the 
 habits of life, and the costumes of that period. Van 
 Mecken was far more successful with home scenes 
 than when copying engravings by great masters. He 
 interpreted nature and copied living figures with un- 
 deniable talent, and one well-known engraving, ' The 
 Concert,' shows what he could do in this secondary 
 style. 
 
 Franz Van Bocholt, another copyist of Schongauer, 
 spent his life in inventing and engraving works which, 
 though they resembled, did not equal the compositions 
 of the master he imitated. He shows real genius in 
 the ' Virgin at the Foot of the Cross,' which is his 
 best work. The Virgin's face is full of genuine suffer- 
 ing, and the draperies are arranged with fair enough 
 
1 58 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 taste. An artist called Mair, who signed his works in 
 full, appears to have followed Israel Van Mecken 
 rather than Martin Schongauer. The engravings we 
 know signed by him are of domestic scenes and cos- 
 tumes, more valuable to. the historian than to the 
 artist. The figures, in the dress of the fifteenth cen- 
 tury, are poor, and the bad drawing, partly disguised 
 by the draperies, is too evident in those parts which 
 are uncovered. Martin Zagel also professed great 
 admiration for Van Mecken. He had an incredible 
 love of ugliness, and produced a number of harsh and 
 inferior engravings, which were not all even original. 
 
 We do not meet with another true master in 
 Germany until the end of the fifteenth century. At 
 that time, however, an artist of Nuremberg arose whose 
 influence nearly equalled that of Schongauer and whose 
 fame is greater. Albert Diirer was the third of 
 eighteen children. His father established himself as 
 a goldsmith at Nuremberg in 1455 ; he could not 
 afford to give his son a thorough education, but he 
 tried to give him the love of work. Albert Diirer 
 learnt his father's trade and quickly surpassed his 
 teachers. But as soon as he was in a position to 
 study painting he left the goldsmith with whom he 
 had been working, and entered the studio of Michael 
 Wolgemuth, whose fame had already spread through 
 Germany. Anthony Koberger, the celebrated printer, 
 and Albert Diirer's godfather, probably knew of this 
 intention, for he published his ' Chronicles of Nurem- 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN GERMANY. 159 
 
 berg ' about this time, and entrusted the supervision 
 of the engravings for this book to Wolgemuth. Natu- 
 rally, young Diirer was readily and kindly received by 
 his godfather's colleague, and when he had served his 
 apprenticeship he visited in succession the Low Coun- 
 tries and the north of Italy. The route he followed 
 is unknown, and we could not speak positively about 
 this trip, but for the evident proofs of his influence in 
 works of the schools of northern Italy and Flanders 
 from the beginning of the sixteenth century. 
 
 In 1494 Albert Diirer was summoned back to Nu- 
 remberg by his father, who had arranged a marriage 
 for him with Agnes Frey, the daughter of a mechanic 
 of the town. Report says, perhaps with exaggeration, 
 that this was not a happy marriage. There was 
 certainly incompatibility of temper between Albert 
 Diirer and his wife. He was open-hearted and gene- 
 rous, she was cold, selfish, and disagreeable. It was 
 impossible for two such uncongenial dispositions to be 
 happy together, and, therefore, on the death of his 
 father in 1502, after providing for his mother and his 
 brothers, Hans and Andrew, Durer left his native 
 town and directed his steps towards Venice, where he 
 was most cordially welcomed. He had scarcely ar- 
 rived before he received an order for a painting for 
 the 'Fondaco dei Tedeschi,' and Giovanni Bellini, 
 anxious to know so famous an artist, sent for him and 
 requested a picture, for which he was even willing to 
 pay, a pleasing announcement to Diirer, who often 
 
160 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 complains in his letters of the parsimony of the Vene- 
 tians. This visit r to Venice and his constant excur- 
 sions to Bologna, formed the happiest time of his life. 
 Young, courted, loaded with honours, alone, and free, 
 he forgot for a time his petty domestic troubles. 
 
 At last, however, he was obliged to return to Nu- 
 remberg, and, fortunately, -he undertook a long piece 
 of work, which lessened his regret for Venice, with its 
 bright skies and refining recreations. Nuremberg, 
 too, appeared under a more favourable aspect to him 
 now. His great genius, as is often the case, being 
 first recognised by strangers, attracted the artists and 
 men of note of the city to his house. His friendship 
 and society were courted by the most distinguished 
 men of the country. The Emperor Maximilian, a 
 great patron of art, delighted to visit him and watch 
 him at work. He showed the greatest regard for him, 
 and wrote and thanked both him and his friend Perk- 
 heimer for the dedication of the beautiful series of 
 wood engravings which Diirer drew for his ' Triumph.' 
 After a long sojourn at Nuremberg, Albert Diirer was 
 again seized with a longing to travel. He set out, 
 but this time he took his wife and servant with him, 
 and went into the Low Countries, where he had before 
 been so heartily received. He has left a journal of 
 this journey, in which he records day by day the 
 honours rendered him, the visits he received and paid, 
 the works he produced, his expenses, his impressions, 
 and the facts which interested him. 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN GERMANY. 161 
 
 But on a certain Friday in 1521, the report spread 
 to Antwerp that Luther had been taken prisoner, and 
 put to death. Albert Diirer immediately wrote a true 
 profession of faith, and in the form of a prayer pub- 
 lished his admiration for the bold Reformer. This 
 enthusiasm met with no approval in the Catholic 
 Netherlands. The Archduchess Margaret, who had 
 hitherto shown great favour to Diirer, became cold 
 and reserved towards him. 
 
 The news of the artist's disgrace quickly spread, 
 and the consequences to him were disastrous. People 
 shunned him ; those who had most admired his talent 
 gradually changed their minds, and turn-ed from him. 
 Fully aware of the sudden alteration of opinion, 
 Albert Diirer prepared to return to his native country, 
 when Christian II., King of Denmark, who had just 
 arrived at Antwerp, gave him an order for his portrait. 
 The painter undertook it, and for a moment hoped for 
 a return to favour, but at a dinner given by the king of 
 Denmark at Brussels, at which the Archduchess Mar- 
 garet and the Queen of Spain were present, the sove- 
 reigns avoided taking the slightest notice of him, and 
 he felt that there was nothing left for him to do but 
 to return to Nuremberg. 
 
 A few months after his return he lost his father-in- 
 law, Hans Frey, and two years later his mother-in-law. 
 Left alone with his wife, whose temper was still more 
 soured by adversity, he endeavoured to find in work 
 a peace which his home could not afford him. But 
 
 M 
 
1 62 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 his powers were inferior to his will. On the 6th of 
 April, 1528, he expired. His funeral was magnificent 
 An epitaph, composed by his friend Pirckheimer, and 
 engraved on a brass plate, at first marked the spot in 
 the cemetery of St. John at Nuremberg, where Albert 
 Diirer reposes. Later, two inscriptions were substi- 
 tuted for it, one in Latin, placed there by the care of 
 Sandrart, and the other in German verse. They are 
 posterity's homage to the greatest artist Germany 
 ever produced. 
 
 Albert Diirer owes his great reputation to his many 
 paintings, and the knowledge of the human figure 
 shown in them ; but his engravings are perhaps even 
 more admired than his paintings. Had Albert Diirer 
 devoted himself entirely to painting, we should have 
 had to admire him on trust ; for his pictures, little 
 valued at first on account of the Gothic style, so much 
 disliked for two centuries, are now nearly all lost or 
 destroyed, and those which remain would not have 
 justified his contemporaries in calling him a master. 
 Happily, his great genius and his habitual tendencies 
 are seen in the engravings he signed and dated. 
 Albert Diirer cared more for truth than beauty ; he 
 drew a great variety of objects with scrupulous fidelity, 
 and instead of shrinking from human ugliness, he 
 ventured to employ his marvellous skill in engraving 
 an old woman with a swollen body, clumsy hands and 
 feet, and a hideous face, to whom he gave the name 
 of ' Nemesis ;' she is now inappropriately called ' La 
 
Fig. 18. The Virgin and the Infant Jesus. Engraved by 
 ALBERT DURER. 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 165 
 
 Grande Fortune.' Diirer had not a true idea of 
 beauty. He knew nothing of the works of antiquity, 
 and had he studied them, it is probable he would have 
 compromised his own originality without gaining any- 
 thing in exchange. He was his own good model for 
 his figures of Christ. The head of the Son of God, 
 as interpreted by him, is manly and full of power ; 
 long hair shades a face betokening physical suffering 
 and inward peace ; thick eye-brows imply strength ; 
 the lines of the lofty forehead intellect, the deep-set 
 eyes thought and sorrow. The Virgin is a good 
 mother, watching her child with loving eyes, or press- 
 ing him tenderly to her breast ; sometimes she is more. 
 She is compassed about with majesty, and though her 
 features are not strictly beautiful, her attitude and 
 expression are full of true nobility. In the Madonna's 
 flowing robes Albert Diirer shows his great skill in 
 arranging draperies, and his command of all the mys- 
 teries of his art. 
 
 Albert Diirer is unrivalled as an engraver ; he drew 
 figures and moulded outlines with inimitable skill. 
 With a very fine graver he hollowed out the metal 
 with an infinite number of lines, which are admirably 
 suited to his designs. His justly celebrated original 
 engravings show no signs of fatigue, although they 
 required such slow, careful, and laborious work. ' Me- 
 lancholia* (a design we scarcely understand), 'The 
 Horse of Death/ 'The Nativity/ 'St. Hubert/ and 
 several small Madonnas, well suited to arouse alike 
 
1 66 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 the zeal of Christian believers, and the admiration of 
 artists, are perhaps worthy of honour, rather on ac- 
 count of the great manual skill than the inventive 
 power displayed in them. Albert Diirer excelled all 
 goldsmiths in carving metal, and all artists in his skill 
 as a designer, and in his knowledge of engraving. 
 
 All Albert Diirer's landscapes, intersected and en- 
 livened by rivers and full of fortified castles and tur- 
 reted houses, are engraved with a pleasing fineness of 
 execution. It is true that the aerial perspective is not 
 very good, but the incorrectness of the relative propor- 
 tions is in a great measure atoned for by the delicate 
 finish of the distances. Albert Diirer excelled in 
 every style. His engraved portraits show his great 
 knowledge of physiognomy, his execution is always 
 good, and his works are excellent models for his suc- 
 cessors, who have only to yield to his influence to be 
 successful. 
 
 Albert Altdorfer lived at Ratisbon ; yet he was 
 entirely under the influence of Albert Diirer, and 
 tried to imitate his style. He is supposed to have 
 introduced into Germany the fashion of engraving in 
 miniature a practice which gained for the German 
 engravers who adopted it the title of petits maitres. 
 Following Diirer's example, most of these petits 
 maitres went to Italy, where they gained a certain 
 beauty of style hitherto unknown in their country. 
 Altdorfer, however, who copied many of Marc- An- 
 tonio's engravings, and palpably borrowed from them 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 167 
 
 in his own compositions, did not gain anything either 
 by his reproductions or his thefts. His drawing 
 remains inferior, without character or expression ; his 
 heads are ugly, and sometimes grotesque ; his en- 
 graving, which is delicate and often skilful, is only of 
 real interest when he employs himself in goldsmith's 
 work or ornaments. These German petits maitres 
 were all jewellers ; and as they always looked at nature 
 in miniature, it is only as workers in gold that they 
 repay study. 
 
 Bartholomew Beham felt the expediency of con- 
 fining himself to this kind of work, and executed 
 with rare delicacy, ' The Virgin Nursing the Infant 
 Jesus/ ' Cleopatra/ ' Children Lying by Deaths' 
 Heads/ and twenty other engravings, in which the 
 skilful and careful work makes up for some unfor- 
 tunate errors of taste, which are to be regretted in an 
 artist of talent Two portraits of Charles V. and 
 Ferdinand L, engraved in 1531, are Bartholomew 
 Beham's principal works ; and they are so true to 
 nature, that they may rank among the best produc- 
 tions of the German school. Hans-Sebald Beham, like 
 his uncle and master, Bartholomew Beham, worked at 
 Nuremberg. He scrupulously followed the lessons 
 he received ; and his engravings differ so little from 
 those of his master, that it would be difficult to dis- 
 tinguish them from each other, but for the initials 
 beneath them. Neither of them shrank from ugli- 
 ness, and both were equally skilled in all the resources 
 
1 68 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 of the graver, which enabled them to cut into the 
 copper with a rare dexterity. Hans-Sebald Beham 
 produced more works than his uncle. Unfortunately 
 he sometimes exceeded the bounds of propriety, and 
 some of his engravings gained for their author the 
 reputation of a debauchee and drunkard, which is 
 contradicted, however, by the rest of his works. No- 
 thing but constant application and hard work could 
 have enabled him to produce so many engravings ; 
 and we cannot therefore believe that a man who 
 produced so many works with so much patience and 
 talent could have passed his life in public-houses. 
 We will therefore erase from the history of art this 
 imputation which Sandrart has cast on Hans-Sebald 
 Beham ; we prefer to consider him, what he in reality 
 was, an earnest and hard-working man, who made the 
 mistake cf sometimes turning aside to represent 
 scenes which were not condemned in his day as they 
 are in ours. 
 
 James Binck, who was born at Cologne, and died 
 at Konigsburg about 1 560, copied from all the great 
 masters Marc- Antonio, Albert Diirer, Martin Schon- 
 gauer, and Hans-Sebald Beham ; and succeeded in 
 fairly imitating the style of each. With Albert Diirer 
 and Marc-Antonio his engraving is soft, with Beham 
 it is father heavy. 
 
 When engraving his own original compositions, he 
 is scarcely the same artist. The close and clear-cut 
 strokes of his work, when he is reproducing copies 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 169 
 
 by the great masters, is replaced by thin and widely- 
 distanced lines, which scarcely suffice to mark the 
 outlines. Binck's style of figures is not so ugly as 
 that of most of his contemporaries. He spent two 
 years in Italy (1529 and 1530), and was not unin- 
 fluenced by the beauty he was able to study there. 
 
 If George Pencz had engraved nothing but ' Jesus 
 surrounded by Little Children,' he would have ranked 
 high among these petits maitres. In this well- 
 arranged composition, the mothers and children are 
 dressed in the German style of the sixteenth century ; 
 and it is therefore not only a really artistic work, but 
 also an authentic record of the costumes of the period. 
 The same may be said of his other numerous works. 
 His figures are generally represented in the costume 
 of that time, and this custom, which has in our day 
 brought upon it so much criticism, is more trustworthy 
 evidence on this vexed question than the false histo- 
 rical records in favour during the following centuries. 
 If Italy influenced George Pencz, it was northern 
 Italy ; Venice and her painters pleased him better 
 than Rome and the pupils of Raphael, and he doubt- 
 less had Giovanni Bellini, Titian, and Giorgione in his 
 mind when designing some of the figures of his com- 
 positions. It is true that he chiefly looked at the 
 smaller and more minute side of nature a peculiarity 
 of many goldsmiths who, even when most talented, 
 diminished not only the size, but also the character, 
 of all they represented. 
 
i;o WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Among the best of petits maitres who faintly 
 reflected Diirer's style, Henry Aldegrever must take 
 a place. He was born in Westphalia in 1502, and 
 died about 1555 ; he passed the greater part of his 
 life at Nuremberg with Dtirer's engravings constantly 
 before him. He caught his style in a great measure, 
 especially in the pose of his heads. Aldegrever tried 
 every style, but was most successful when he merely 
 represented the people of his time ; no invention was 
 needed in them, and his copies are admirable ; he gets 
 rid of his usual exaggeration, or the undue length of 
 his figures is disguised by the draperies, which do not 
 hang in such abrupt folds as in designs of his own 
 invention. He surpassed all competitors in the orna- 
 ments and figures with which he embellished the 
 sheaths of knives and daggers, showing far more skill 
 and imaginative power in them than in works with 
 the human figure for its principal object. 
 
 Some few artists practised etching at the time when 
 line-engraving was justly rising to such distinction in 
 Germany. Albert Durer set the example ; but he 
 did not succeed so well with it as with his other works. 
 His style and manner were not much copied. This 
 mode of engraving seems not to have suited the 
 Germans ; they preferred a less expeditious process, 
 which would allow them to mature their conceptions 
 before giving expression to them. The Hopffers 
 David, Jerome, and Lambert had little taste for 
 drawing, and their etching shows but little variety. 
 
Fig. 19. German Costume. H. ALDEGREVER. 
 

 ^ 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 173 
 
 It would not be easy to explain the esteem in which 
 their works are held, for the copies of their prede- 
 cessors' compositions are valueless on account of their 
 inexactitude. Hans-Sebald Lautensack and Augus- 
 tine Hirschvogel, both painters from Nuremberg, also 
 left a number of etchings ; but they do no more 
 to raise our opinion of German etchers than those 
 by the Hopffers. Although drawn with a fine and 
 incisive needle, these small landscapes by Lauten- 
 sack do not equal his portraits in line-engraving. 
 The latter are remarkable for much character 
 and for the truth of the physiognomy ; they even 
 excel his portrait of George Rockenbach, which is 
 merely etched. Neither do Augustine Hirschvogel's 
 plates raise our opinion of etching in Germany, 
 although they may be of value to collectors of 
 curiosities. It was scarcely worth while to notice 
 these artists, as they left no good specimens of their 
 work. 
 
 Line-engraving declined when the school founded 
 by Albert Diirer began to lose its renown. The taste 
 for small things, such as ornaments and jewelry, sur- 
 vived, but the art was doomed. It had lost much that 
 it had once possessed in the hands of the skilful en- 
 gravers we have named. The period of originality 
 had gone by, and we find none but second-rate artists, 
 who had lost their own individuality in imitating their 
 predecessors. 
 
 Virgilius Solis was born at Nuremberg in 1514, and 
 
174 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 died in the same town in 1570. Like the petits 
 maitres, he attempted to perpetuate the style of his 
 predecessors ; but he was very inferior to them. He 
 could scarcely draw a life-like figure if he did not 
 copy it. His work is, meagre, and without softness 
 or charm ; among his numerous works a few prettily 
 decorated pieces of jewelry are alone worthy of 
 notice. Virgilius Solis and Jost Amman engraved a 
 series of portraits of the kings of France, which added 
 nothing to their reputation. Jost Amman, who sup- 
 plied numerous designs to wood-engravers, has left a 
 number of fine and delicate, but monotonous, etchings. 
 The designs are small and confused. One of Amman's 
 best works of this kind is a portrait of Gaspard de 
 Coligny, surrounded with ornaments and small scenes 
 relating to his life. His own wood-engravings, and 
 those he caused to be executed after his designs, are, 
 however, far superior to any of his etchings ; and 
 the series of costumes published in his name show 
 little knowledge, but a varied and fertile imagina- 
 tion, and contribute more to his fame than all his 
 etchings. 
 
 Theodore de Bry also belongs to this group of late- 
 coming imitators of the petits mattres. He was 
 born at Liege in 1528, and established himself at an 
 early age at Frankfurt, where he died in 1 598. He 
 was one of the most industrious artists of the sixteenth 
 century. His works prove his great predilection for 
 jewelry. He was aided in his large publications, such 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 175 
 
 as ' The Long and Short Voyages/ by his sons, espe- 
 cially by John, who often showed himself equal to his 
 father. But he appears to us to have succeeded best 
 with small subjects in which thousands of small figures 
 are represented, or when he engraved ornaments, 
 which betoken a decided style and a vivid imagination. 
 In this he resembled those engravers who rivalled 
 goldsmiths in their delicate handling and love of small 
 dimensions. Theodore de Bry closes the list of 
 German engravers who worked in miniature, and 
 aspired to no style and to no ideal. 
 
 At the end of the sixteenth century German art 
 took a new direction ; or. to be more exact, it lost all 
 its originality. Native engravers were monopolised 
 by publishers, who were more anxious that they 
 should work much than well. Matthew Merian, the 
 author of an immense number of views of towns ; 
 the Kilian family, all engravers of portraits ; Dominic 
 Gustos, a Fleming naturalized at Augsburg ; Martin 
 Greuter, a great admirer of allegorical subjects and 
 armorial bearings ; the Hai'ds, who employed mezzo- 
 tint engraving ; and many others, are only worthy of 
 remembrance in the history of art on account of their 
 portraits of distinguished persons, and their copies of 
 monuments and compositions which are now destroyed. 
 Many of their engravings are skilfully executed, that 
 is all. The Germans of the seventeenth and eigh- 
 teenth centuries all yielded to the same temptation, 
 and thought too much of fine strokes. They de- 
 
WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 lighted, above all things, in showing off their skill of 
 execution, and forgot that knowledge of drawing is 
 indispensable to a good engraving. 
 
 Wenceslas Hollar was an exception to this. In his 
 frequent and long journeys he was able to compare 
 
 Multer Bafilienfir . 3\9 r 
 Fig. 20. A Lady of Bale. W HOLLAR. 
 
 rival schools, and all his engravings are so entirely 
 original that not one betrays the influence of his 
 master, Matthew Merian. Hollar's execution is vivid 
 and harmonious, Merian's cold and dull. The pupil 
 
UHI7IRSITY 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 177 
 
 excelled in copying the human face, he rendered 
 admirably the transparency of glass, the brilliancy of 
 metals, the hair or feathers of animals, and the gloss 
 of textile fabrics. But he required a good model 
 before him, and when he was without one his en- 
 gravings were decidedly inferior. 
 
 Wendel Dieterlin, unlike Hollar who travelled in- 
 cessantly, never left Alsace. He was not content with 
 being a skilful architect and a celebrated painter, he 
 also published, in a collection which is now highly 
 valued, a number of specimens of decorative art of a 
 most original style. Highly gifted and full of en- 
 thusiasm he was daunted by nothing ; with admirable 
 spirit he invented forms of the greatest variety, and, 
 had he not imprudently introduced figures of question- 
 able taste into these ornaments, he might have taken 
 honourable rank among the architectural engravers 
 of the Renaissance. His adventurous needle, while 
 remaining entirely under his control, went boldly to 
 work on the copper, producing ingenious and .facile 
 strokes, and his wildest efforts were often crowned 
 with unexpected success. 
 
 After these artists, true art appears to have become 
 extinct in Germany. J.-E. Ridinger, Ch. Dietrich, 
 .Ch.-B. Rode and Weirotter were painters of inferior 
 talent, who occasionally used the needle, but with 
 very little success. Hans-Elias Ridinger owes the 
 little reputation he has rather to his hunting-pieces 
 and scenes from animal life, than to the talent of his 
 
 N 
 
i;8 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 engravings. Dietrich struggled hard, but without 
 avail, to recall Raphael's style, but he did not impose 
 even on the most ignorant ; his engraving was clumsy, 
 his drawing bad, and he knew nothing of chiaroscuro. 
 Christian-Bernard Rode, born at Berlin in 1725, jour- 
 neyed a great deal ; but gained nothing by his travels ; 
 his engravings are pretentious and very careless ; 
 there is no real thought in his pompous composi- 
 tions, they have neither order, taste, nor knowledge of 
 effect. The landscapes of Francis Edmund Weirotter 
 are of scarcely any interest, and to complete our 
 review of engravers of the German school we must 
 cross the Rhine and go to Paris, where artists appear 
 to have assembled to learn from French masters 
 the secrets of an art which their own country had 
 lost. 
 
 John George Wille and his friend George Frederick 
 Schmidt went to France at an early age, and there 
 began to study engraving. They remained in that 
 country and earned their living by working with the 
 publisher Odieuvre. Wille soon out-distanced his 
 competitors by his ease of execution. Hyacinthe 
 Rigaud soon saw some of his engravings, and at once 
 recognised their merits ; he aided the young artist by 
 introducing him to amateurs and enabling him to 
 copy important works, and the young German's repu- 
 tation was soon greater than that of any French 
 engraver of his time. Every distinguished visitor to 
 Paris who cared at all for art, solicited an introduction 
 
ENGRA VING IN GERMANY. 179 
 
 to him, and each one justly acknowledged the great- 
 ness of his genius and the refinement of his taste ; 
 for John George Wille possessed a large collection of 
 art objects and pictures, and many of the latter are 
 reproduced in his engravings. The chief beauty of his 
 best works is their brilliant and careful execution ; 
 none knew better than he how to vary his work to 
 suit the object represented. This perfect execution 
 has its drawbacks. It gives the engraving a decidedly 
 metallic appearance, and we are distracted by the 
 beauty of the details when we would fain admire the 
 work as a whole. The artist thinks more of his own 
 fame than that of his model ; and in this he has 
 mistaken his aim ; for should not an engraver identify 
 himself entirely with his original and devote his whole 
 energy to re-producing faithfully the work of the 
 painter he has chosen ? 
 
 George Frederick Schmidt began life with his in- 
 timate friend and fellow-countryman Wille. They 
 came to Paris together, and their early struggles were 
 the same. Schmidt found a friend in Nicholas Lan- 
 cret, as Wille had in Hyacinthe Rigaud. Schmidt 
 was introduced to the engraver Larmessin and pre- 
 pared his plates for him, employing his few moments 
 of leisure in engraving small portraits for the publisher 
 Odieuvre, which, if they added little to his reputation, 
 at least helped to earn him a living. He soon thought 
 of setting up for himself, and Hyacinthe ^Rigaud, who 
 had seen some of Schmidt's works, again proved his 
 
i8o WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 sagacity by entrusting to the young artist a portrait of 
 the Count of Evreux, which he had finished. He was 
 completely satisfied with the result. This was most 
 fortunate for Schmidt, as Rigaud, convinced of his 
 powers, gave him, with the prelate's consent, the por- 
 trait of St. Albin, archbishop of Cambray, to copy, 
 and the cordial and well-deserved reception of this 
 beautiful engraving completely established its author's 
 fame. From this time (1/42) Schmidt brought out 
 engravings every year, all testifying to his knowledge 
 and industry. 
 
 His style of engraving somewhat resembled that of 
 Wille. He generally used the graver only, and, in 
 addition to ease of execution, the beauty of his pro- 
 ductions is enhanced by his knowledge of colouring. 
 Sometimes, unfortunately, his cleverness led him also 
 astray, and he did not copy with sufficient care the 
 painting he was rendering. He was less successful 
 in etching. Although some of his portraits in this 
 style fetch a high price at sales, we cannot admire 
 them much. Etching needs great freedom of execu- 
 tion ; and in this branch of art Schmidt did not 
 excel. He seems to have entered with his needle into 
 a hopeless competition with the graver. 
 
 In any case J. G. Wille and G. Fr. Schmidt, who 
 went to study French art, themselves greatly in- 
 fluenced it. Their fame exceeded that of their fellow- 
 students. Bervic, the master of modern French en- 
 graving, studied diligently under the judicious direction 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN GERMANY. 181 
 
 of J. G. Wille, and afterwards faithfully transmitted to 
 his own pupils the lessons he had himself received. 
 
 After these self-exiled masters, Germany can 
 proudly name several artists who had the restoration 
 of engraving in their native country much at heart. 
 Christian Frederick Miiller gained well-merited dis- 
 tinction by his engraving after the ' Madonna di San 
 Sisto.' Joseph Keller in his engraving after Raphael's 
 celebrated cartoon of ( The Dispute on the Sacra- 
 ment/ and other works, has shown his power of faith- 
 fully rendering the grandeur of the most exalted 
 compositions. Finally James Felsing, who did not 
 aspire to works of equal difficulty, also gave proof of 
 the practical skill he had acquired by his studies of 
 the works of his predecessors. 
 
1 82 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN ENGLAND. 
 
 Engraving on Wood W. Caxton The Influence of Foreign 
 Masters on English Art Its Originality in the Eighteenth 
 Century, and its Influence on our Age. 
 
 IN England there are schools both of painting and 
 engraving. They are worthy of careful study, 
 whatever those may think who have never crossed the 
 Channel. They were established rather late, but are 
 now more than a century old, and in this short time 
 they have reached the same excellence as the schools 
 in neighbouring countries ; if England has attracted 
 to her shores foreign masters such as Holbein, Van- 
 dyck, Petitot, Largilliere and others, she has profited 
 by their examples, and the French, who were at one 
 time aided in the same manner by the Italians, should 
 be the last to reproach her with this. Besides, in 
 modern times, the English school has had a great 
 influence upon the French, which it would be uncandid 
 to deny. We allude to the romantic movement which 
 replaced the principles of David (still followed by 
 some few Frenchmen) by others of a very different 
 kind. However, we have now to consider engraving 
 only, and we must begin by stating that the English 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 183 
 
 were at first less enthusiastic than the French about 
 the new discovery, although they were equally ready 
 to avail themselves of it. This coldness may be 
 accounted for by the strictness of their religion, which 
 excluded paintings from their churches and engravings 
 from their prayer-books ; whereas the earliest wood- 
 cuts of Italy, Germany, France, and the Low Coun- 
 tries appeared in devotional works. 
 
 It is strange that the earliest book printed by the 
 first English printer, William Caxton, is in French, 
 and it is also the first printed in that language. 
 Its title is, ' Cy commence le volume intitule le 
 recueil des hystoires de Troyes compose par vene- 
 rable homme Raoul le feure pretre chappellain de mon 
 tres-redoubt seigneur Monseigneur le due Philippe 
 de Bourgongne en 1'an de grace mil cccc Ixiiii.' Un- 
 fortunately, in England as in other countries, en- 
 graving had at first no individual character. William 
 Caxton seldom illustrated his books with engravings, 
 and when he did indulge in them he could only 
 employ awkward carvers of images ; and on this 
 account his plates are of no artistic value. The second 
 edition (but without date) of the first book printed in 
 England in 1471 ('The Game and Playe of the 
 Chesse'), contains representations of a player at a 
 chess-board, a king, two knights, and a bishop, but 
 there is nothing to betray their origin or nationality 
 except the text which surrounds them. It is the 
 same with another book not quite so rare, ' Thymage, 
 
1 84 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 or Mirrour of the World/ 1481. The few engravings 
 in it represent a professor teaching grammar, or a 
 logician lecturing his pupils from his chair, they are 
 as devoid of art as the preceding ones, a decisive 
 proof of the small skill of the early English en- 
 gravers. In an edition of ^Esop's Fables (' The Subtyl 
 Hystoryes and Fables of Esope') published three 
 years later, in 1484, by Caxton, we find some en- 
 gravings copied from preceding Latin and French 
 editions, which would seem to confirm our opinion of 
 the inferiority of other nations to ourselves, if any 
 comparison be possible between works of no talent 
 and possessing archaeological interest only. 
 
 There were certainly many other books containing 
 woodcuts published in England in the fifteenth and 
 sixteenth centuries, but it would not be worth while 
 to detain the reader by mentioning them. We will 
 merely state that English authors asserted the merits 
 of their own engravings, and took part in the discus- 
 sion on the origin of the invention, emphatically repu- 
 diating the claims of all competitors by the assertion 
 that engraving is not a modern invention at all, 
 because, according to a certain verse in Genesis, Tubal 
 Cain invented it.* The argument is original, but it 
 
 * The text of Genesis upon which the authors who fix 2975 
 
 B.C. as about the date of the invention of engraving rely, is as 
 
 follows : " And Zillah, she also bare Tubal-cain, an instructor 
 
 of every artificer in brass and iron : and the sister of Tubal- 
 
 . cain was Naamah." Gen. iv. 22. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 185 
 
 would be waste of time to refute it. Instead of going 
 so far back, we will commence our study when English 
 engraving acquired an individual character and was 
 practised by men of talent. 
 
 We begin with John Payne, who was born in 
 London in 1606, and died in the same place in 1648. 
 He did not form a school or at once rise to eminence, 
 but his engravings, executed with the graver alone, 
 are superior to those of his predecessors. He was a 
 pupil of Simon de Passe, a Flemish artist, who spent 
 many years in England. John Payne executed, some- 
 what harshly, vignettes, ornaments, and portraits, 
 succeeding better, like most of his fellow-countrymen, 
 with the human face than with anything else. William 
 Faithorne was born in 1620, about the same time as 
 John Payne, and died in 1691. He raised engraving 
 in England to a high standard of excellence. His 
 biography is interesting. A pupil of Peack, an Eng- 
 lish painter, Faithorne, like his master, embraced 
 the cause of Charles I. ; was made prisoner on the 
 fall of that monarch and shut up at Aldersgate. He 
 employed the leisure moments of his captivity in 
 engraving, and it was in prison that he executed the 
 portrait of the Duke of Buckingham. The reputation 
 of his early works, and the influence of his friends, 
 obtained him his liberty. But on leaving prison he 
 refused to swear allegiance to Cromwell, and was 
 therefore banished from his country. He came to 
 France and continued his studies, first with Philip of 
 
1 86 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Champagne and then with Robert Nanteuil, whose 
 lessons were of great service to him. He soon became 
 famous, and when events allowed of his return to 
 England in 1650, he was cordially welcomed by his 
 fellow-countrymen on account of his talent. Like his 
 friend and master, Nanteuil, he drew portraits in three 
 shades with perfect success, and they soon became 
 much in vogue. Fortunately, he did not give up 
 engraving, and he was most apt in seizing the expres- 
 sion of the physiognomy, as seen in the numerous 
 engravings and drawings he has left. It would be 
 impossible to excel his interesting and life-like por- 
 traits. Formed by the lessons he received from Nan- 
 teuil, and imbued with his principles, he sometimes 
 equalled him, but never imitated him so much as to 
 lose his own originality. Nanteuil's portraits betoken 
 a profound knowledge, and at the same time, are in 
 the self-contained and reserved style peculiar to the 
 French school ; whilst Faithorne's engravings after 
 Vandyck or his admirers, or designed by the artist 
 himself, show the influence which the illustrious pupil 
 of Rubens exercised on the rising school, and are 
 remarkable for a power of colouring to which the 
 French engraver never aspired. The portraits of 
 R. Bayfeild, William Paston, William Sanderson, and 
 others, fully justify the esteem in which the works of 
 William Faithorne, surnamed the Elder, are held. 
 His other engravings are not equally clever. 'The 
 Holy Family/ after Simon Vouet, or 'The Virgin 
 
Fig 21. Portrait of R. Bay feild. Engraved. by WILLIAM FAITHORNE. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 189 
 
 caressing the Infant Jesus,' after Laurent de la Hyre, 
 which slightly recall the style of Couvay and of 
 Mellan, without all their talent, would not alone 
 entitle Faithorne to very high rank. 
 
 Many artists endeavoured to follow the manner of 
 William Faithorne, but not one had sufficient origin- 
 ality to merit a place in our review of the English 
 school. They were all inferior. Their fellow-country- 
 men had so poor an opinion of them that they sent 
 across the Channel whenever they wished to have a 
 valuable work engraved. Nicolas Dorigny was sent 
 for from France to reproduce on copper Raphael's 
 famous cartoons, preserved at Hampton Court ;* 
 Baron copied the paintings of Rubens and Van- 
 dyck in English collections, and it was not until the 
 eighteenth century that we find artists in England 
 sufficiently skilful with the graver to reproduce the 
 best works of art which had accumulated in their 
 country. 
 
 We must not suppose that there were no engravers 
 in England during this long period. Wenceslas 
 Hollar, a German established in London, gave a 
 praiseworthy impulse to etching. Again, Prince 
 Rupert introduced into the United Kingdom the 
 style of engraving called mezzotint or the English 
 style, so successfully have English artists adopted it. 
 We must speak more particularly of these two 
 processes later, now we are concerned merely with 
 
 * Now in the South Kensington Museum. 
 
WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 line engraving and we must again allude to French 
 influence. 
 
 Robert Strange, born in 1723, died in London in 
 1795. When quite young he crossed the Channel 
 and went to study in Paris with Philip Lebas, who 
 taught him the first elements of engraving. But 
 Robert Strange soon surpassed his master in the 
 handling of his tools, and left the studio in which his 
 talent had been developed to go to Italy and study the 
 great masters. He spent five years in that country, 
 working with enthusiasm at paintings by Raphael, 
 Titian, Correggio, Guido, and Carlo Maratti. He did 
 not return to establish himself in London until his 
 studies were so complete that he imagined he had 
 nothing more to learn. Unfortunately he overrated 
 the advantages of his ease of execution, and his en- 
 gravings show insufficient knowledge of drawing. 
 Few artists excelled Strange in engraving ; his work 
 is pleasing and well shaded, his strokes are admirably 
 managed, rounding off the outlines and crossing each 
 other without monotony or confusion. There are no 
 signs of weakness or weariness in any engraving of 
 his ; all show thorough and profound knowledge of 
 the resources of his art. What a pity that all this 
 should be marred by imperfection of drawing ! The 
 artist with all his intelligence thought more of giving 
 the exact appearance of the designs before him than 
 of interpreting their character and style. 
 
 William Woollett, also born in England, and a 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 191 
 
 pupil of John Finney, directed his attention to land- 
 scape. He engraved figures also, and some important 
 compositions, such as ' The Battle of the Hogue,' and 
 the ' Death of General Wolfe/ but he never succeeded 
 better than in his reproductions of pictures by Claude 
 Lorraine, Wilson, or Pillement The beautiful grada- 
 tions and fine proportions of his plates are unsurpassed ; 
 no predecessor obtained such varied results by the aid 
 of the graver alone. The distant horizons, lit up by 
 a last ray from the setting sun, are accurately designed, 
 and are perfectly distinct although so far away. They 
 diminish gradually whilst the trees and grass of the 
 foregrounds stand out in bold relief. The latter are 
 cut with a very large graver which deeply penetrates 
 the copper, leaving large grooves far apart from each 
 other into which the ink is plentifully absorbed. 
 Claude, whose works, as is well known, have always 
 been highly prized in England, inspired Woollett's 
 best engravings. The engraver was irresistibly at- 
 tracted by the grand and masterly disposition of the 
 forms, the deep infinite horizons, and the beautiful 
 scenery of the landscapes, and he succeeded in in- 
 terpreting the great qualities of the painter. Claude 
 Lorraine was never better understood than by Wool- 
 lett, and he so thoroughly identified himself with his 
 model, that his engravings are rivalled by none but 
 the superb etchings from the great landscape painter's 
 own hand. 
 
 Francis Vivares, though born in France near Mont- 
 
192 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 pellier, may be included in the English school, because 
 he spent the greater part of his life in England, and 
 learnt his art there. He rendered Claude. Lorraine's 
 works with almost as much skill as Woollett. He 
 too confined himself almost entirely to landscapes of a 
 particular style by Lorraine, Caspar Poussin, or Patel. 
 His plastic style of work admirably suited grand 
 compositions such as theirs. The judiciously distri- 
 buted light, affecting each object differently, in which 
 these masters delighted, is transmitted to copper with 
 remarkable accuracy. It would appear impossible for 
 art to render the sun, especially with no resources at 
 its command but black ink and white paper, and 
 yet his rays seem to inundate these engravings by 
 Vivares. Like the master from whom he took his 
 inspiration, the engraver thoroughly understood the 
 laws of light and shadow. A man of ingenuity and 
 resource, he arranged his shadows so that those 
 parts meant to be in the direct rays of the sun were 
 scarcely covered by light strokes, and by being placed 
 in juxtaposition with condensed lines were thrown up 
 with extraordinary brilliancy by the shadows which 
 surrounded them. 
 
 William Wynne Ryland, born in London in 1732, 
 learnt engraving with Ravenet, a French artist 
 established in England. He afterwards- went to 
 France, entered the studio of Boucher, where he 
 etched two landscapes after that -master, with some 
 ability. He then took lessons for a time from James 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 193 
 
 Philip Lebas, and returned to his native land after 
 five years' absence. Unfortunately, on his return to 
 England, he neither profited by what he had learnt in 
 France, nor by the examples set before him, but was 
 attracted by a new style introduced by an Italian 
 engraver, Francesco Bartolozzi, which consisted in imi- 
 tating with the graver the effect produced on paper 
 with a pencil. In the hands of a good draughtsman 
 this process could, and did, accomplish much ; but 
 Ryland had not talent enough to turn it to good 
 account ; and then he generally worked at the vulgar 
 creations of Angelica Kauffmann, thereby gradually 
 losing the position he had gained by his first works. 
 An accidental circumstance, however, suddenly com- 
 pelled him to give up engraving. He was accused of 
 forgery, tried, convicted, and condemned, and after 
 that his name was never heard again. 
 
 The list of English line-engravers is soon exhausted : 
 there remain two only, George Vertue and Abraham 
 Raimbach, who may be said to have attained any dis- 
 tinction in the history of English art. George Vertue 
 excelled in reproducing the pictures of Sir Godfrey 
 Kneller. His engraving is very correct, almost monoto- 
 nously so ; but the English aristocracy patronised him 
 because he was very skilful with physiognomy, and 
 rendered most happily the distinguished air of lords 
 and ladies. The Prince of Wales charged him to 
 make a collection of engravings for him, and Horace 
 Walpole, who stood high as a man of letters and a poli- 
 
194 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 tician, did not scorn to use the notes on English artists 
 collected by the engraver. In the first edition of his 
 Anecdotes of Painting,' published in 1762, he places 
 his own name after that of George Vertue ; and at the 
 end of his work he has a long note on the English 
 artist, in which he awards just praise to the talent of 
 his fellow-countryman. 
 
 Abraham Raimbach closes the list of English en- 
 gravers. He seemed born to interpret the works of 
 the painter Wilkie. He has reproduced the well-con- 
 ceived and spirited pictures called * Blind Man's Buff/ 
 'The Rent-Day,' and the 'Village Politicians' with 
 surprising delicacy and skill. In spite of their large 
 size these prints are what are called genre engravings ; 
 they are prepared and nearly finished in etching, and 
 then almost entirely retouched with the graver ; and 
 as combined by Raimbach, the two processes pro- 
 duced most pleasing results. The joyous or grave 
 faces of the children playing round their fathers, or 
 the small tenants impatiently waiting to pay the 
 money which is due, are faithfully transferred to the 
 metal. The bright and pleasing appearance of the 
 paintings is also rendered, and there is a general 
 harmony about Raimbach's engravings which Wilkie's 
 canvasses have now in some measure lost. Abraham 
 Raimbach is certainly worthy to rank high among his 
 fellow-countrymen ; and in a general history of the 
 art of engraving, his works class him amongst those 
 who best understood all the resources of their art, and 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 195 
 
 excelled in rendering the different passions depicted 
 in the human countenance. 
 
 Francis Barlow deserves mention on account of his 
 delicate and skilful etchings of animals. 
 
 Although there were so few clever line-engravers or 
 etchers in England, in spite of the efforts and attrac- 
 tive example of Wenceslas Hollar, Mezzotint Engrav- 
 ing, introduced, as we have said, by Prince Rupert, 
 was at once enthusiastically adopted in that country. 
 It was more successful in England than elsewhere, 
 and its rapid triumphs are easily accounted for. The 
 works of Sir Joshua Reynolds, of Gainsborough, and of 
 Sir Thomas Lawrence, softly and agreeably coloured, 
 and not very strictly drawn, were well suited to this 
 kind of engraving, which allows of vagueness of out- 
 line and great freedom of treatment. Anthony Van- 
 dyck's portraits taken in England were equally good 
 subjects. This was at once recognised by a number of 
 English artists. Not only were there more mezzotint 
 engravers in England than elsewhere, they were also 
 more skilful and of readier invention than any of their 
 foreign competitors. We are not sure who founded 
 this school of engraving, who was the first master, or 
 what influence he exercised over his contemporaries. 
 
 Richard Earlom, whose name is perhaps the best 
 known, did not, like most of his contemporaries, excel 
 in portraiture, he owes his reputation rather to his 
 justly admired engravings of fruit and flowers after 
 Van Huysum , and his ' Bathsheba leading Abishag 
 
196 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 to David ' is considered the chef-(T<zuvre of mezzotint 
 engraving. We ourselves do not admire his works 
 sufficiently to consider him the founder of a school, 
 and we still hold to our opinion, that English artists 
 treated portraiture better than historical or genre 
 paintings. It is easy to review other English works 
 of exalted style, but it would take a long time to enu- 
 merate only the best of the portrait-painters. Sir 
 Joshua Reynolds, the most celebrated of them, sup- 
 plied eager engravers with numerous subjects, and a 
 review of his works would introduce us to all the 
 mezzotint engravers of England. Amongst so many 
 beautiful engravings it is difficult to know which to 
 prefer. J. R. Smith, in his portraits of Master John 
 Crewe and Lady Caroline Montagu, shows equal talent 
 to that of V. Green in the portraits of the Duke of Bed- 
 ford, of W. Chambers, or the Lady Caroline Howard ; 
 and MacArdell, J. Watts, James Ward, J. Faber, J. and 
 Thomas Watson, E. Fisher, John Dixon, W. Dickin- 
 son, G. Clint, C. H. Hodges, C. Turner, John Murphy, 
 C. Corbutt, S. Paul, J. Grozer, John Jones, J. Spils- 
 bury, and R. Dunkarton, engraved with equal 
 skill the portraits of Mrs. Beaufoy, Joseph Baretti, 
 Richard Burke, the Duke of Devonshire, Drummond, 
 the Archbishop of York, John Paterson, Garrick, 
 Lady Elizabeth Lee, the Duke of Leinster, Lady 
 Charles Spencer, Robert Haldane, John Lee, Viscount 
 G. Maiden and Lady Capel, the Duke of Portland. 
 Mrs. Chambers, Viscountess Spencer, Lady Seaford, 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 197 
 
 Fox, Miss Jacob, and Miss Horneck. These engrav- 
 ings are such exact imitations of the originals, that 
 Reynolds must himself have superintended the artists. 
 None of the engravers, however, had any individual 
 character to distinguish them from each other. In 
 spite of the difference of their educations they all 
 worked with about equal skill, all were acquainted 
 with the resources of mezzotint, all equally careful to 
 render the gradations of shade in the works they 
 copied. Many used bistre instead of black ink, as 
 being better suited to the transitions from light to 
 dark, and producing altogether a more harmonious 
 effect. 
 
 Godfrey Kneller, although born at Lubeck in 1648, 
 and formed in Rembrandt's school, must be included 
 among English painters, notwithstanding his foreign 
 origin and education. He established himself in 
 London when very young, and never again left it ; his 
 style of painting resembles that of English artists 
 more than any other, and he seems to have forgotten 
 the lessons he had received from the moment he 
 set foot in Britain. Many line-engravers copied 
 his paintings, but J. Smith was almost the only one 
 who rendered them in mezzotint, and in return the 
 painter took the engraver's portrait, which he at once 
 transferred to copper. Amongst the other portraits 
 engraved by J. Smith after Sir Godfrey Kneller, the 
 principal are those of William III., King of Eng- 
 land, the painter William Vandevelde, the Countess 
 
198 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 of Salisbury, and John, Duke of Marlborough. These 
 engravings are exact copies of the master's somewhat 
 formal paintings, but the execution is heavy and rather 
 inharmonious. 
 
 Thomas Gainsborough, a charming painter, whose 
 works were deservedly successful during his life, had 
 not the will or the opportunity to gather around 
 him engravers to reproduce his works. Yet mezzotint 
 is peculiarly well suited to render the light effects of 
 his paintings ; and portraits of the Prince of Wales 
 engraved by John Raphael Smith, of Richard Warren 
 by John Jones, of the Earl of Derby by George Keat- 
 ing, and of Henry Duke of Buccleuch by J. Dixon, 
 not only show the talent of their engravers, but also 
 how well mezzotint could interpret the brightness and 
 freshness of these pictures which are true and grand 
 representations of the English aristocracy. Unfortu- 
 nately only a few of Gainsborough's paintings have 
 been engraved, and the very pretty picture called 
 'The Blue Boy/ which was so justly admired in the 
 Exhibition of 1862, was not reproduced by engravers 
 in the time of the painter. Sir Thomas Lawrence was 
 more fortunate ; he had not, it is true, many imitators, 
 but he met with one engraver, Samuel Cousins, who 
 produced a fine masterpiece after one of his paintings. 
 We allude to the portrait of Pius VII., the best mezzo- 
 tint engraving of modern times. Thoroughly well- 
 instructed in his art, the engraver has preserved all 
 the life and grandeur of the original ; he has managed 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 199 
 
 the light with the greatest tact, and drawn the pontiff's 
 head with a power unknown to most of his contempo- 
 raries. Charles Turner also engraved an excellent 
 portrait of William Pitt after Lawrence ; and he him- 
 self, England's last great master, was fortunate enough 
 to find many contemporary artists who thoroughly 
 understood his works, and interpreted them with 
 praiseworthy talent. 
 
 We have not yet spoken of the humourist school. 
 It however gained great distinction in England ; and 
 we intend to close our study of English engraving 
 with a notice of this style, which is of rather historical 
 than artistic interest, as it borrowed its subjects largely 
 from literature, politics, and contemporary customs ; 
 and would lose much by being considered from a 
 merely artistic point of view. 
 
 William Hogarth is the master of this style. Born 
 of poor parents, he was apprenticed to a goldsmith 
 instead of being sent to a good master, who could 
 have prepared him for a literary career. His father 
 had struggled in vain all his life, in spite of a good 
 education, to attain a higher position than that of a 
 printer's overseer, and his example early showed his 
 son the illusory character of a literary life. He turned 
 resolutely from literature, and this m#n, who was to 
 inaugurate a new style of art, began life by chasing 
 metals, and engraving armorial bearings, figures, and 
 arabesques on silver, gold, or bronze. It was thus he 
 learnt the trade of an engraver. After working for 
 
200 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 some years with a goldsmith, he determined to leave 
 the humble profession of a copyist and devote himself 
 to art properly so-called. He studied nature with 
 enthusiasm, looking always at the picturesque side of 
 every .creature and of every thing, and noting in his 
 memory or on paper that which struck his attention 
 on his rambles. The wretched life of his parents had 
 left a tone of sadness on his observing and inquiring 
 mind, which made him see the saddest and most pain- 
 ful side of humanity. Thus his ideal was not beauty 
 of form, or elegance of outline, not graceful action or 
 noble attitude, but truth and power of expression. 
 Though harsh and rough sometimes, his work is always 
 full of energy and character. Fielding said of his friend 
 Hogarth : "The figures of other painters breathe, those 
 of Hogarth think." He was right. Hogarth is more of 
 a philosopher than an artist. His paintings, often dull 
 and inharmonious, are no doubt cleverly composed, 
 and some figures are really artistic ; but the thought 
 is everything ; the subject absorbs all attention and 
 interest at the expense of the drawing and execution. 
 'The Harlot's Progress/ 'The Rake's Progress,' or 
 ' Marriage a la Mode,' are really comedies in several 
 acts, moral comedies in which the author does not 
 shrink from a coarse and revolting representation of 
 certain actions, for the sake of teaching how terribly 
 they are afterwards expiated. William Hogarth did 
 not confine himself merely to composing pictures, he 
 also engraved them, a fortunate circumstance, as his 
 
fc-C 
 
 
 
ENGRA VING IN ENGLAND. 203 
 
 works retained their original style and attractions 
 better than they could have done in the hands of other 
 artists. His engravings were nearly completed in 
 etching, and then most skilfully retouched with the 
 graver. Thinking above all of expression, he used 
 the needle or graver for that purpose as readily as the 
 brush, and his engravings not only possess all the 
 qualities of his pictures, but excel them in their har- 
 mony. 
 
 There is a wide difference between William Hogarth 
 and other English painters of manners and carica- 
 turists. The master is anxious about the philosophical 
 side of his work, and desirous of giving to his com- 
 positions all the value of a moral lesson, but the cari- 
 caturists who succeeded him cared little to make their 
 works of general interest. If they intended to ridicule 
 anyone they exaggerated his physical defects, or re- 
 presented him in rags, or wretched and scorned, that 
 was all ; and if they did depict one of the thousand 
 miseries, of life they carried buffoonery to the greatest 
 extreme, the figures, the gesture, the expression, the 
 dress, are exaggerated to such an extent that they do 
 not always provoke even a laugh. 
 
 James Gillray, the most famous of these carica- 
 turists, was born at Lanark, in 1757 : like Hogarth, 
 he began work under a goldsmith, but his passion for 
 the theatre was so great, that he quitted the studio, 
 which he had but irregularly attended, to join a stroll- 
 ing company of players. In this new career, he had 
 
204 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 to endure mortifications of all kinds. After wander- 
 ing from town to town without meeting in any with 
 the success he had dreamt of, he had the good sense 
 to leave those who had led him astray and return to 
 the paternal roof. On his return to London he went 
 through the course of study at the Royal Academy, 
 and we are told joined the studio of W. Ryland. He 
 began as a caricaturist in 1779 and devoted himself to 
 this kind of work without intermission. Every event 
 of any importance furnished him with materials for 
 caricature, and every conspicuous person had to 
 appear before Gillray's tribunal. When at the height 
 of his power, William Pitt is represented playing at 
 cup-and-ball with the terrestrial globe. Later, in 
 1797, when the minister, lately so powerful, could not 
 meet the rush upon the funds caused by the fear of 
 invasion, he is drawn as King Midas, with an ass's 
 head. The Emperor Napoleon is said to have sup- 
 plied the English engraver with the subject of many 
 caricatures. The greater number are coarse. A 
 political caricaturist, Gillray placed his talent at the 
 service of the passions of the moment, and this entitles 
 him to be considered one of the artists who contributed 
 much to throwing light upon the history of England in 
 the reign of George III. 
 
 Thomas .Rowlandson may be classed with Gillray, 
 although he did not take up exactly the same line. 
 He was born a year earlier, in July, 1756, and directed 
 his attention rather to the manners of the people than 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN ENGLAND. 205 
 
 to politics. The action of his characters is excellent, 
 and he was most successful in the arrangement of a 
 number of figures in one group. He used the needle 
 as much as the pencil or pen ; he engraved merely for 
 the sake of multiplying the grotesque scenes he 
 invented, without caring at all about the process he 
 employed or to display his own skill. His chief aim 
 was to expose the absurdities of his contemporaries, 
 and in this he generally succeeded. Towards the 
 close of his life Thomas Rowlandson designed vignettes 
 for books. The illustrated book which gained him 
 the greatest success in England was ' Doctor Syntax/ 
 an account of the innumerable adventures of a luck- 
 less traveller pursued by misfortune. The etchings, 
 coloured by hand, which accompany the text show 
 the witty side of Thomas Rowlandson's talent, and 
 may be considered some of his best productions. 
 Rowlandson squandered his fortune in Paris, partly at 
 play. When his resources were all but exhausted he 
 wisely determined to work hard again. He returned 
 to London and went through the course of study at 
 the Royal Academy. But his old propensities regained 
 the mastery and led him into fresh follies. He needed 
 the spur of necessity to make him work, and his life 
 was a series of alternations between want and prodi- 
 gality. When old and infirm, with faculties as much 
 impaired by dissipation as by age, he sank into 
 poverty and died on the 22nd of April, 1827. 
 
 George Cruickshank, who was also a caricaturist, 
 
206 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 flourished soon after the artists we have named. His 
 name is attached to an immense number of most 
 comic vignettes. Although he produced some few 
 good political engravings, he preferred scenes of man- 
 ners which were simply and avowedly grotesque. He 
 and his brother Robert learnt drawing with their 
 father, Isaac Cruickshank, and he remained so long 
 under the paternal tuition that it was quite late in life 
 before he signed his works. The works of the father 
 and the two brothers are so much alike that it is not 
 easy to distinguish them. George was nevertheless 
 the most talented. He may be considered the chief 
 of the comic and humourist school which still exists 
 in England. He is now old and works less than he 
 did ; but his influence is still great over young artists, 
 and his style is still much in favour. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 207 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ENGRAVING IN FRANCE. 
 
 Engravers on Wood Engravers on Metal The School of 
 Fontainebleau Portrait-painters Nicolas Poussin and 
 Jean Pesne Charles Lebrun and Gerard Audran The 
 School of Watteau Vignette Engravers The School of 
 David. 
 
 RANGE has small claim to the invention of 
 engraving, although she did not remain inac- 
 tive while the movement was taking place in other 
 countries. Several French woodcuts are known to 
 belong to the middle of the fifteenth century, and are 
 in fact contemporaneous with the earliest engravings 
 brought out in other countries. Better still, some 
 playing-cards of undoubted antiquity, as proved by 
 the emblems on them, which were in use in certain 
 reigns only, were brought out in France before the 
 time of engravings, properly so called ; and the bar- 
 barous style of some prints, with a text or legend in 
 French attached to them, would furnish material for 
 the researches of modern learning. But it would be 
 
208 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 useless to revive the question of priority ; we will leave 
 it to the archaeologists, and only notice the time when 
 French art manifested itself in a decided and definite 
 manner. The first book embellished with engravings 
 appeared in France at the end of the fifteenth century, 
 but the * Romance of Fierabras ' (Lyons, 1480), ' Belial, 
 or the Consolation of the Poor Fishers' (1484), and 
 other works with wood-cuts, have a fictitious value 
 only in the eyes of amateurs on account of their 
 antiquity, and can scarcely be regarded as really sig- 
 nificant specimens of wood engraving. In fact, Antoine 
 Verard's publications, ' The Sea of Histories ' (La 
 Mer des Histoires), amongst others, printed by Jean 
 Dupre in 1491, are the first works in which this art 
 takes a true position ; the hatching of the engraving 
 is still coarse ; the ornaments are without delicacy, 
 and recall in many points the complicated arabesques 
 of French architectural monuments of the fifteenth 
 century ; but the invention is often happy, and we see 
 the same love of truthful representation in them with 
 which we are familiar in earlier miniatures. The sim- 
 plicity of the expressions, the life of the figures, make 
 up for the want of knowledge of composition, and 
 render us indulgent to the faults of drawing, and the 
 imperfections which abound in these early efforts. 
 The ' Dance of Death,' printed for the first time in 
 1485, by Antoine Verard, and often reprinted since, 
 perhaps contains more interesting engravings than the 
 ' Sea of Histories.' The persons successively sum- 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 209 
 
 moned by Death, each receive the gloomy messenger 
 in a characteristic way ; the face of each has its own 
 individual expression ; the Pope prepares to follow 
 the skeleton which draws him to the tomb, with a 
 resignation of which the Emperor is incapable ; the 
 merchant leaves his business with despair ; the usurer 
 cannot make up his mind to relinquish his treasure ; 
 the knight tries to struggle with Death, who is hurry- 
 ing him away ; in fact, each one is rendered in his true 
 character, and surely the inventor of these figures is 
 worthy to be included amongst the engravers who 
 first raised themselves to the rank of artists. 
 
 When the French became accustomed to engrav- 
 ings in their histories and romances, which brought 
 the scenes recounted visibly before them, they wished 
 to have the same thing in the devotional books issued 
 for their edification. They were not content with the 
 old missals and prayer-books ornamented with minia- 
 tures, as none but rich men could possess them, and 
 the invention of printing had created a passion for 
 reading unknown before. Wood-engraving found a 
 good opening in these religious works, and largely 
 profited by it. Numbers of artists were employed by 
 publishers anxious to meet the wishes of the public ; 
 and although the names of these men of talent are 
 lost, we can enumerate the printers who employed 
 them and facilitated their efforts. Antoine Verard 
 and Simon Vostre occupy the first place among these 
 printers. Books issued by them and bearing their 
 
 P 
 
210 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 marks, contain small ornamental subjects, which frame 
 the verses of psalms or short prayers, and are not 
 always applicable to the accompanying text. The 
 artist has turned to the Old and New Testaments, 
 and sometimes to private life, for the subjects of 
 his ornaments. Occasionally, by some strange whim, 
 a profane object, such as a centaur drawing a bow, 
 is introduced among sacred ornaments. The com- 
 position is as varied as the invention, but the style 
 of the engravers is always the same. The figures 
 always stand out on a back -ground covered with 
 stippling, which is supposed to imitate the golden 
 back-grounds of miniatures. The figures are dis- 
 posed without affectation, the action is simple and 
 life-like. There is a larger engraving at the begin- 
 ning of each service, which generally represents a 
 biblical subject; 'The Creation of Eve/ 'The An- 
 nunciation/ ' The Visitation/ or ' The Resurrection.' 
 Although simplicity is their chief merit, there is a 
 certain attempt at composition which shows, that 
 although still in its infancy, the art was gradually 
 progressing. Here and there we can detect foreign 
 influence ; some engravings recall German works, 
 others Flemish figures, but the greater number seem 
 to have taken their inspiration from the French minia- 
 tures, those excellent models which French engravers 
 of the end of the fifteenth century should never have 
 lost sight of. 
 
 The impulse once given, numbers of printers placed 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRA NCE. 2 1 1 
 
 their presses at the service of the new art. Philip 
 Pigouchet and Simon Vostre together brought out in 
 1488 a ' Book of Hours ' according to the Church of 
 Rome. Thielman Kerver either borrowed or had 
 copied the engravings of the same printer for his 
 books of devotion. Gilles Hardouin, with the same 
 object in view, employed a succession of artists, 
 who produced some interesting works, although they 
 were too much influenced by German art. William 
 Eustache, William Godart, and Francis Regnault, 
 also took part in the movement, and brought out 
 curious works, but their publications were inferior, as 
 they had not such skilful artists at their command. 
 At last, however, trade encroached on art, and the 
 demand for cheap editions led to the production of 
 works by no means equal to the earlier ones. 
 
 But, fortunately, the sixteenth century was now 
 opening ; the movement known as the ' Renaissance ' 
 was beginning, and France, perhaps, took as active a 
 part in it as any other country. The sculptors, Jean 
 Goujon and Germain Pilon ; the architects, Bullant, 
 Philibert Delorme, and Pierre Lescot ; the painters, 
 Jean Cousin and the Clouets, had added entirely new 
 lustre to French art. Engraving did not linger 
 behind. Guided by these masters, wood-engravers in 
 their humbler sphere showed talent at least equal to 
 that of their neighbours. They cut wood with the 
 same ease and delicacy, and they copied the excellent 
 models before them so faithfully as sometimes to 
 
212 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 sacrifice their own personality to that of the masters 
 whose works they were rendering. The most indus- 
 trious of these second-rate French masters is known 
 under the name of the ' Petit Bernard.' He never 
 added his name or monogram to his engravings, and 
 we should not know who was the artist who produced 
 so many prints in the sixteenth century, in which the 
 delicacy of the work rivals the nicety of the drawing, 
 but for the following notice in an edition of the Bible, 
 dated 1680 : "The figures which we give here are from 
 the hand of an excellent worker, known in his day 
 by the name of Salomon Bernard, or the Little 
 Bernard, who was always well thought of by connois- 
 seurs in this sort of work." These small compositions 
 are animated by thousands of figures in easy groups ; 
 their action is natural, and they are drawn with 
 elegance. French art in them clearly displays its 
 national wit and vivacity. 
 
 The extraordinary success of the engravings of 
 * Petit Bernard ' naturally led other artists to attempt 
 the same style. They soon became skilful in it. At 
 first publishers ordered devices from them to distin- 
 guish their publications from others, then followed 
 borders of flowers, tail pieces, capital letters, in which 
 minute works rare talent was shown, proving that art 
 requires neither large spaces nor public applause to 
 make its way everywhere. Unfortunately, it is dim- 
 cult to class the publications of this period. One 
 thing is certain, they are by different artists. But 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 213 
 
 not one took the precaution of signing his works, and 
 if a few names have escaped oblivion, it is not always 
 certain under which works they should be placed. 
 The name of the talented artist who drew and en- 
 graved two small works which may be considered the 
 best wood-engravings of the sixteenth century, is ab- 
 solutely unknown. We allude to the ' Figures of the 
 Apocalypse' (Paris, Estienne Groulleau, 1547), and 
 ' The Loves of Cupid and Psyche ' (Paris, Jeanne de 
 Marnef, widow of Denis Janot, 1546). The transla- 
 tion of the * Dream of Polyphilus' (Paris, 1546), also 
 contains engravings of a most elegant style. They 
 reproduce the engravings of the Italian artist who 
 adorned the edition published by the brothers Aldus 
 at Venice in 1499, but they are modified to suit French 
 taste. We have long sought in vain for any trust- 
 worthy evidence as to the name of the artist. Hitherto 
 one only of this great number of wood-engravers has 
 been the subject of a special work, and by means of 
 the numerous engravings collected and published by 
 his biographer, we can form a very fair idea of his 
 talent. Geoffrey Tory, of Bourges, whose life has 
 been completely written by M. Auguste Bernard, was 
 at the head of a school of engravers, and all the works 
 issued from his studio were marked with a double 
 cross, which was, to use a modern expression, their 
 trade-mark. The master himself worked at engraving, 
 and although he seldom employed any sign but that 
 common to the studio, he doubtless hoped that his 
 
214 WONDERS OF ENGRA VI NG. 
 
 peculiar style of working on wood would suffice to 
 prevent his productions from being .confounded with 
 those of his pupils. Indeed, it is not difficult to detect 
 the manner of Geoffroy Tory in a certain number of 
 engravings marked with the cross of Lorraine only, 
 which evidently at least passed through his hands. 
 If we take as a guide the ' Hours of the Virgin/ 
 published by Simon de Colines and signed in full, 
 Geoffroy Tory, we are sure not to make a mistake. 
 The drawing of the ornaments and figures is that of 
 an artist acquainted with all the resources of the art. 
 The cutting of the wood scrupulously follows the 
 direction of the required form, thousands of small 
 broken-off strokes attest alike the inexperience of the 
 engraver and his intention not to swerve from the 
 outlines given. The style of the arabesques is bor- 
 rowed from the purest sources, and resembles the 
 antique ; the supple graceful figures show the love of 
 elegance which the artists of Fontainebleau carried to 
 extremes. Reasoning by analogy, and without refer- 
 ring to any engravings but those bearing the cross of 
 Lorraine, we can without hesitation ascribe to Geoffroy 
 Tory 'The Entry of Henry II. into Paris in 1549,' 
 ' The Old and New Covenants/ an allegorical compo- 
 sition engraved on a design, recalling the manner of 
 Jean Cousin, and ' Francis I. listening to Machault 
 reading his Translation of Diodorus Siculus.' These 
 engravings, which are worthy of the first place in every 
 choice collection, are the only ones which we feel sure 
 
Fig. 23. Henri II. From the " Entry of Henry II. into Paris in 1549." 
 By GEOFFROY TORY. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 217 
 
 were entirely engraved by Geoffrey Tory. But we 
 must not expect too much ; we can, it is true, name 
 but few of the early French engravers, but this appears 
 to us an additional reason for not slighting those 
 worthy of our notice. Let not the French follow the 
 example of some nations, who, blinded by a mistaken 
 national pride, and thinking to enhance the glory of 
 their fellow-countrymen, have passed over in silence 
 many French wood-engravers of the sixteenth century, 
 and left the most remarkable productions in oblivion. 
 
 After Geoffroy Tory and the anonymous engravers 
 of his time who tried to imitate his manner, wood- 
 engraving rapidly declined. Engraving on metal was 
 coming into favour. Olivier Codore, the author of the 
 plates which decorate the ' Entry of Charles IX. into 
 Paris on the 6th of March, 1672,' worked heavily, and 
 in spite of the correctness of his drawing and his 
 careful execution, seems to have heralded the deca- 
 dence of this art. Wood-engraving, with which some 
 French artists had succeeded so well, soon fell into 
 the hands of artisans who looked upon it merely as 
 an economical way of depicting passing events, or an 
 easy mode of satisfying with biblical and fabulous 
 subjects the popular love for allegorical and religious 
 pictures. 
 
 It was then that Perissim and Tortorel engraved on 
 wood the sad events of the reign of Charles IX. ; 
 their engravings met with such success that they were 
 immediately copied on copper in France, Holland, 
 
218 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 and Germany, and multiplied in immense numbers. 
 This success was owing rather to the subjects them- 
 selves, drawn in the heat of the moment, as they 
 occurred day by day, than to the talent of the artists 
 who produced them. 
 
 At the foot of the large engravings of religious or 
 secular subjects brought out in the sixteenth century, 
 there are the names of many little-known publishers, 
 who may themselves also have handled the graver ; 
 Jean Leclerc, Denis de Mathoniere, Marin Bonnemer, 
 Germain Hoyau, Nicolas Prevost, Francois de Gour- 
 mond, and some few more, must be considered not 
 only as traders in the engravings of others, but also 
 as artists who both directed studios, and set an ex- 
 ample to their pupils by themselves taking part in 
 the work. Unfortunately, the necessity for rapid pro- 
 duction was detrimental to these engravings. They 
 still retain a faint and distant resemblance to the 
 graceful and spirited works of French art of the six- 
 teenth century, but they are clumsily and carelessly 
 executed. Sometimes, however, in spite of all the 
 hasty work of the engraver, the drawing shows excel- 
 lent taste and incontestable ability ; it is only when 
 trade encroaching on art first invaded and then took 
 possession of it, that wood-engraving, so successfully 
 practised in France for more than a century, dis- 
 appeared entirely, to remain in complete oblivion for 
 two centuries ; that is to say, until our own time, when 
 some picturesque publications forced themselves on 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 219 
 
 public notice, and a great and unexpected demand 
 arose for similar productions. In the eighteenth 
 century the works of Papillon, the somewhat diffuse 
 historian of wood-engraving, created little interest 
 The heavy and monotonous execution of the inferior 
 designs reproduced by him could scarcely attract atten- 
 tion at a time when so many copper-plate engravers 
 were designing and engraving with such charming 
 grace all kinds of vignettes, groups of flowers and 
 tail-pieces for the ornamentation of books. The time 
 was ill-chosen. Far more talent than Papillon pos- 
 sessed was required to effect a revival of wood-en- 
 graving, and his attempt proved abortive. Fifty years 
 later the same design was conceived, and being worked 
 out with talent and enthusiasm, it met with decided 
 and brilliant success. Large publications were set on 
 foot, and owing to the earnest intelligence of those 
 who conducted them, they prospered beyond expecta- 
 tion ; publishers called the most experienced designers 
 to their aid, who in their turn trained engravers ; the 
 different processes were improved or perfected, good 
 taste was generally diffused; the long-neglected art 
 flourished once more, and no one now dreams of dis- 
 puting the superiority -of France in this popular style 
 of engraving. 
 
 Engraving on Metal. The French have no more 
 claim to the invention of this than of wood-engraving. 
 Some authors look upon certain plates engraved by a 
 
220 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 peculiar process, called manure criblee, as the oldest 
 specimens of engraving, but we do not think this 
 opinion will have any weight with those who know 
 and appreciate the ( Pax' of Maso Finiguerra. Nor 
 is France the only country which availed itself of this 
 process. 
 
 One word only as to the execution of works done in 
 the maniere criblee. After covering his plate with an 
 infinite number of small white dots on a uniformly 
 black ground, the artist if a worker of this kind 
 deserve the title marked out the shape of the figure 
 he tried to copy with heavy strokes, and, not content 
 with a mere copy, he even attempted shading by 
 means of small lines produced with an instrument 
 which rather fretted than made incisions on the metal. 
 Being engraved on very soft material, on silver or on 
 tin, these plates are of archaeological value only in- 
 teresting from an historical, not an artistic point of 
 view. The name of Bernard Milnet, given without 
 consideration to the author of engravings in maniere 
 criblee, because of an inscription at the foot of the 
 ' Virgin with the Infant Jesus in her Arms,' is now 
 more than doubtful. Different interpretations have 
 been given of this inscription. Every one is agreed 
 that scarcely an artist of the fifteenth century, what- 
 ever his merit, cared enough for fame to sign his name 
 in full ; the greatest masters sometimes placed their 
 monogram or some figurative sign in a corner of their 
 plates, but many left no mark by which they can be 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 221 
 
 recognised. The work, however, is so different that it 
 is evident one artist could not have produced all the 
 engravings of this kind. Many engravers then used 
 the manifoe criblee according to their ability, but none 
 passed that boundary so difficult to define which 
 separates true artists from artisans. 
 
 There was no distinguishing original power in the 
 engravings in Breydenbach's book, called ' Holy 
 Pilgrimages to Jerusalem and the adjacent Neighbour- 
 hood' (Lyon, Michel Topic de Pymont and Jacques 
 Heremberck, 1488). They reproduce on copper, wood- 
 engravings published at Mayence two years before, 
 and they give us panoramas of Venice, Parenzo, 
 Corfu, Modon, Candia, Rhodes, and a general view of 
 the Holy Land and its environs. The engraving is in 
 a very backward stage, but the architectural designs 
 are careful, and on this account their author called 
 the Engraver of 1488 deserves honourable mention 
 in a comprehensive review of French artists. Noel 
 Gamier, who came soon after him, and was quite a 
 primitive engraver, signed the greater number of his 
 prints in full or with his initials. His copies of en- 
 gravings by Albert Du'rer, George Pencz, and Hans- 
 Sebald Beham are characterized by deplorable feeble- 
 ness, and show no talent whatever ; he must not 
 escape severe judgment, for at the time he lived good 
 models were not rare, great masters were within his 
 reach (some of the engravings he copied were exe- 
 cuted as late as 1 540) but he could not avail himself 
 
222 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 of the advantages around him and the inferiority of 
 his work is without excuse. 
 
 The first engraver on metal of whom France may 
 be proud, and who deserves the title of master, is Jean 
 Duvet. He was born at Langres in 1485. However 
 much Italy may have influenced his genius he still 
 retained his native individuality. Mantegna seems to 
 have been his favourite master, and Jean Duvet's best 
 work, 'The Martyrdom of St. Sebastian,' belongs to 
 the school of the Paduan master. The series of 
 ' The Apocalypse' and the engravings relating to the 
 ' Amours of Henry II.,' however, seem to have been 
 produced quite independently of foreign influence. 
 These compositions are rather confused ; the work 
 is too much alike, the accessories are brought out as 
 carefully as the principal figures, and the result is 
 that the interest is divided and the eye does not at 
 once seize the intention of the whole. Two artists 
 of Lyons, Claude Corneille, and Jean de Gourmont 
 signed their engravings with their monograms ; a double 
 C and a J and G interlaced. They were probably 
 jewellers before they became engravers. Their style 
 of working on copper resembles that of the second- 
 rate wood-engravers who flourished at Lyons in the 
 sixteenth century, and they were probably guided by 
 them. They chiefly excelled in small compositions. 
 They delighted in complicated architecture, and 
 peopled their porticos and unfinished rotundas with 
 small biblical or fabulous personages, which they drew 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 223 
 
 with some spirit ; the neat and careful execution be- 
 traying their former occupation of goldsmiths. One of 
 them, Jean de Gourmont, was also a painter. There is 
 a picture of his in the Louvre, ' The Nativity/ which 
 was formerly in the magnificent castle of Ecouen, and 
 the same delicacy of touch and taste for architecture 
 are observable in the painter as in the engraver. 
 
 Jean Cousin, one of the greatest artists of the 
 ' Renaissance/ with whom most modern historians 
 begin the history of painting in France, did not disdain 
 to handle the needle. He was not content with supply- 
 ing wood-engravers with the excellent designs which 
 illustrate his " Treatise on Perspective' and his ' Book 
 of Portraiture/ he wished himself to fathom the diffi- 
 culties of an art which, although almost at its zenith 
 in other countries, was only beginning to make head 
 in France. He engraved and signed three plates : 
 ' The Conversion of St. Paul/ ' The Annunciation/ and 
 ' The Entombment/ impressions from which are very 
 rare. Boldly and skilfully engraved, they would alone 
 suffice to give a very complete idea of Jean Cousin's 
 talent, In them we find the grandeur of style and 
 the subdued elegance which are characteristic of this 
 master. The different expressions of the figures are 
 all appropriate, each face well conveys the meaning 
 intended by the artist. Look at the holy women who 
 are wrapping Christ's body in its shroud, they testify 
 their grief in different ways ; some bathe the feet of the 
 corpse with tears, others, wrapped in fervent contem- 
 
224 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 plation, are content to adore. In the ' Annunciation,' 
 the celestial messenger is a contrast to the modest and 
 shrinking Virgin, who receives the news with gratitude, 
 mingled with a kind of dread. Finally 'St. Paul/ 
 stretched on his back, among his soldiers, seems to 
 implore Divine mercy, with his arms extended towards 
 Heaven. We look in vain amongst early French 
 engravers for the grand style of beauty, for the truth 
 of action and expression which are so conspicuous in 
 the works of this talented master. 
 
 In the sixteenth century engraving advanced in 
 France with rapid strides. Line-engravers and etchers 
 of great original power are very numerous, even with- 
 out including those of the school of Fontainebleau. 
 The style of Pierre Woeiriot, an artist of Lorraine, in his 
 engravings after his own designs, resembles that of his 
 predecessor, Jean Duvet. He, too, overdid the work 
 in his figures. All his portraits are not of equal merit, 
 but we are favourably impressed by his engraved like- 
 nesses of Louise Labbe, Francois de Serocourt, 
 Antoine Le Pois, and of himself. In them he is seen 
 to great advantage, either because these faces suited 
 him better, or because they were really superior models, 
 they entitle him to rank among the excellent and 
 prolific portrait-takers who flourished throughout the 
 sixteenth century in France. 
 
 Nicolas Beatrizet and Nicolo della Casa, fellow- 
 countrymen of Woeiriot, passed their lives in Italy. 
 They were French by birth only, and their style 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 225 
 
 resembles that of many Italian masters the Ghisi, 
 for instance far more than that of any Frenchmen. 
 Their talent was not so great that the French need 
 care to lay claim to it ; they yielded to the influence 
 of Michael Angelo's successors, and, like all the late 
 disciples of this great master, they copied his exag- 
 gerations, and missed the true beauty and style of his 
 works. Etienne Duperac, who also lived at Rome, 
 devoted himself entirely to copying the picturesque 
 sites and monuments around him. His style is cold, 
 but his drawing is correct, and there is much valuable 
 archaeological evidence on the ancient monuments of 
 Rome to be found in his works. 
 
 Paris was not, in the sixteenth century, what she 
 became later, a centre of attraction to all artists. 
 Until then the provinces also had their schools of 
 engraving, and each department, so to speak, could 
 cite some honourable name. Orleans, amongst others, 
 could pride herself on having produced the engraver 
 Etienne Delaune. He was certainly one of the most 
 prolific of the clever engravers of the French Re- 
 naissance. His style gives evident proof that he had 
 studied a goldsmith's trade. This accounts for his 
 love of small works. He did produce two or three 
 large engravings, after compositions by Jean Cousin ; 
 but he was not nearly so much at his ease in this style. 
 When left to himself, or when he engraved his son's 
 designs, he managed to produce complicated compo- 
 sitions in very small spaces, and yet, with so much 
 
 Q 
 
226 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 exactness, that each person and object is admirably 
 proportioned and could not be better placed. In 
 engraving he first drew a general outline, and moulded 
 it into shape with little dots, now and then heightened 
 with strokes a usual practice with goldsmiths who 
 had to finish off every portion of their plates with 
 minute and loving care, as they were submitted to 
 the direct gaze of the public. Numerous ornaments, 
 some elegant arabesques, some pieces of jewelry, and 
 two rare engravings of the interior of a goldsmith's 
 studio, complete the works of the engraver of Orleans, 
 and justify the esteem in which he is held. 
 
 Jean Chartier and Pierre Vallet were born and 
 worked at Orleans. The former executed, with a 
 certain harshness, about ten engravings of allegorical 
 figures 'Force/ ' Abundance/ ' Justice/ &c. The 
 drawing shows that the artist had kept pace with 
 the progress made in France in his age, but the 
 engraving has fallen far short of the designer's inten- 
 tion, and is miserably poor. 
 
 Pierre Vallet was much more skilful. He etched 
 the celebrated map of Paris, prepared by Francois 
 Quesnel, with ease combined with exactness. He 
 was an equally true interpreter of the human counte- 
 nance, as proved by his own portrait and that of the 
 botanist, Jean Robin ; and in his engravings of the 
 romance of ' Theagene' and ' Chariclee/ he has shown 
 that he could also cleverly render the designs of others. 
 
 Joseph Boillot was a native of Langres. He has 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 227 
 
 left two works of totally different styles ; in his ' Livre 
 des Termes,' the engraving is heavy and the plate is 
 overloaded with useless strokes ; but in another of 
 his books, M'Art Militaire' (1598), on the contrary, 
 his work is picturesque, harmonious, and easy, without 
 being incorrect. 
 
 Pierre Sablon etched his own portrait at Chartres, 
 and has taken care to tell us to what we are indebted 
 for his likeness in the following lines : 
 
 " Me contemplant un jour en deux diverses glaces 
 Je veis le mien profil despeinct naivement 
 Lors je de'libere en moy soudainement 
 De graver ce pourtraict dont vous voyez les traces." 
 
 At Bourges, Jean Bouchier, a very clever artist, but 
 of little celebrity, whose works show real talent, 
 engraved six pilates with so much elegance and grace, 
 that we think he must have taken his inspiration from 
 the school of Parma. His best work represents the 
 ' Virgin Standing with the Infant Jesus in her arms, 
 who is holding up his mouth to kiss her.' The 
 divine Child's action, stretching up to reach his 
 mother's face, is prettily conceived, and the artist has 
 most happily rendered the mother's joy in finding 
 herself thus beloved. Jean Bouchier's engravings are 
 distinguished rather for correctness of drawing and 
 justice of expression than for practical ability, for the 
 execution is unskilful, and shows that the artist had 
 not studied the process. Other provincial engravers 
 worthy of notice might be named, but it is not 
 
228 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 desirable to pursue this inquiry further ; by naming a 
 few we have sufficiently indicated the state of the art 
 of engraving in France in the sixteenth century. 
 
 Paris, too, had her share ; indeed, she was the centre 
 in which the engravers of greatest talent met together. 
 Pierre Biard executed an extensive series of original 
 engravings in a picturesque style ; but he succeeded 
 better when he followed the designs of others ; and 
 two copies ' The Slave/ after Michael Angelo, and 
 1 Venus jealous of Psyche urging Love to avenge her 
 wrongs/ after Giulio Romano although rather too 
 freely rendered, give a more favourable idea of his 
 talent than all his other works. 
 
 In some engravings which adorn the ' Ballet 
 Comique de la Royne faict aux nopces de Monsieur 
 le Due de Joyeuse et de Madamoyselle de Vaudemont' 
 (Paris, 1582, in 4to), Jacques Patin gave proof of 
 considerable talent ; the drawing of the large figures 
 might be better, but the finely-executed engraving, as 
 a rule, deserves all praise. 
 
 Side by side with these artists arose a group of 
 engravers who were content to reproduce the works 
 of others, probably because they themselves lacked 
 all power of invention. There being no well-organised 
 school of painting in France, although many of their 
 neighbours possessed an almost embarrassing number, 
 some sought their models in Flanders, some in Italy. 
 Charles Mallery, Pierre Firens, and Jean Baptiste 
 Barbe took their inspiration from the works of Wierix, 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 229 
 
 and did not fail to imitate his feeble style of inter- 
 preting nature. Like their patrons, they succeeded 
 better with portraits than with religious subjects. 
 The latter, indeed, are executed with wearisome 
 monotony, everything is worked out with equal care, 
 and the art of bringing the interesting parts into 
 relief is altogether wanting. Philip Thomassin, Va- 
 lerien Regnart, and other Frenchmen of the same 
 period, turned to Italy ; but instead of studying the 
 masterpieces of Marc-Antonio and his pupils, they 
 addressed themselves to Cornelius Cort, a Flemish 
 artist established at Rome, and tried to imitate his 
 pompous and insipid style. By this strange fancy 
 they gained nothing and sacrificed their own origi- 
 nality. Their harsh engravings of these compositions 
 of questionable taste could give them but a very 
 inferior position as artists. 
 
 The engravers of whom we have been speaking 
 were indifferent to the school of Fontainebleau, to 
 which Francis I. had attracted experienced masters 
 from all countries. It was otherwise with those who 
 are now to occupy us. Italians, French, and Flemish, 
 while breathing the same air, seem to have forgotten 
 their own nationality, or rather their works were com- 
 binations of the styles peculiar to each country. 
 
 Two Italian masters, Rosso and Primaticcio, directed 
 the school. They were both highly gifted, and their 
 works taught better lessons than any amount of the 
 best theoretic instruction could have given. While 
 
230 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 architects enlarged the king's favourite palace, artists 
 assembled in France covered the walls with immense 
 frescoes, which supplied engravers with innumerable 
 subjects. 
 
 Among the best engravers of the school of Fon- 
 tainebleau whose names are preserved to us we must 
 name Antonio Fantuzzi, Leonard Tiry, Rene Boyvin, 
 and Guido Ruggieri. They left many works signed 
 in full, or with a monogram, and w r orked under the 
 supervision of Rosso or Primaticcio. This accounts 
 for the marvellous exactness with which they copied 
 the almost exaggerated grace and elegance of some 
 of these masters' paintings. Antonio Fantuzzi, some- 
 times called Maitre Fantose in France, was the most 
 talented of the engravers of the school. He seemed 
 born to copy the designs of Primaticcio. In the 
 * Parnassus,' a composition full of figures, he succeeded 
 by the nicety of his work in giving to each group, to 
 each figure, its. true distinctness and its true pro- 
 portions. In an equally complicated composition 
 representing ' Jupiter sending Juno, Venus, and 
 Minerva to Paris,' he heightened his etching with 
 some strokes of the graver, which relieve the work 
 without injuring the harmony of the engraving ; but 
 when he used the graver only, as in the ' Grottoes of 
 Fontainebleau,' signed in full, 'Ant. Fantuz. J. D. 
 Bologna fecit an. D. MD. 45,' he was evidently fettered 
 by the limited capabilities of his tools, and his work 
 is cold compared with his etchings. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRA NCE. 2 3 1 
 
 Leonard Tiry, a Fleming by birth, who passed part 
 of his life in Italy, and came to France when his talent 
 was developed, was the most prolific of the engravers 
 of Fontainebleau. He was a true artist ; his etchings 
 are easy, and his line engravings so free that we forget 
 the process employed. He rendered the works of 
 Rosso and Primaticcio with perfect fidelity, and with 
 such facility that he seemed to be working out his own 
 ideas, rather than compelled to follow the designs of 
 others. His landscapes show a strange mixture of 
 the styles of the countries he had successively in- 
 habited. His architecture proves his visit to Italy, 
 his costumes his sojourn in France, and the general 
 appearance of his engravings, the slim, jagged, abrupt 
 strokes, tell plainly that he lived in that country whose 
 scenery has been rendered with such marvellous exact- 
 ness by Francis Hogenberg. Vasari not unreasonably 
 conjectures that Leonard Tiry (called by some his- 
 torians of engraving, Leon Daven), was formerly a 
 painter, and had worked with Rosso, which would 
 account for the engraver's great ability. 
 
 Rene Boyvin was born at Angers. Nothing is 
 known of his life, of the date of his birth, or the name 
 of his master. But we are aware, and this, perhaps, 
 is all that is necessary, that he was a very skilful 
 engraver and a zealous admirer of the painters of 
 Fontainebleau. He employed the graver only, and 
 this instrument, so difficult to manage, became lissome 
 and graceful in his hand, producing excellent results. 
 
232 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Boyvin's numerous engravings after Rosso, Prima- 
 ticcio, and Lucas Penni, show profound respect for 
 the talent of those masters, and prove that line- 
 engraving under a clever artist is as well fitted to 
 render complicated subjects as etching. The series 
 called the ( History of Jason/ after Rosso, speak well 
 for Rene Boyvin's powers. Each small subject is 
 enclosed in a different border, showing the painter's 
 fertile imagination and the engraver's ease of handling 
 the burin. Guido Ruggieri followed Rosso and Prima- 
 ticcio when in France ; he, too, used the graver, and 
 succeeded in rendering with it the works of the 
 masters whom he took as models. His productions 
 are not numerous, but they are such as to justify the 
 favour in which he is held. 
 
 Leonard Limousin, the celebrated enameller, pro- 
 duced a few engravings only, which were mere speci- 
 mens of patterns to be reproduced in enamel. They 
 were original, and their style resembles that of the 
 school of Fontainebleau. Four plates with his initials, 
 dated 1544, are of subjects from the New Testament ; 
 they are rather harsh, but the handling is clear, bold, 
 and free. The compositions, too, are happily con- 
 ceived ; the drawing is firm, correct, and powerful. 
 The outlines merely of the figures are given, the 
 artist reserving the rest of the work for a process 
 which he understood better. 
 
 Geoffroy Dumonstier, a member of a celebrated 
 family of painters in France, produced some vigorous 
 
ENGRA VING IN* FRANCE. 233 
 
 etchings of an ultra-picturesque style. His slender 
 figures of the Virgin or the Shepherds adoring the 
 infant Jesus are exggerations of Rosso's favourite 
 forms (we may remark that the painter-engraver 
 treated this subject five times), the distribution of the 
 light, which is concentrated on the Divine Infant, is 
 all that redeems the work of Dumonstier, who owes 
 his reputation to his name rather than to his pro- 
 ductions. 
 
 Jacques Prevost, born at Gray, has left a portrait of 
 Francis L, which is full of life and character. He has 
 copied the toothless mouth of the old monarch with 
 an exactness which must have been displeasing to the 
 king and his courtiers ; but it is attractive to those 
 who value correctness of drawing and persevering 
 pursuit of truth, as it proves that the artist of Franche 
 Comte thought more of these than of Court favour. 
 
 We will merely mention the existence of the nume- 
 rous anonymous engravings inspired by the artists of 
 Fontainebleau ; any discussion of their merits would 
 delay us too long. Their authors are known under 
 the collective name of the anonymous engravers of 
 the school of Fontainebleau. 
 
 Engraving only played a secondary part in the 
 general movement of art at this period. It served to 
 multiply and spread abroad the works of the school, 
 but it was not appreciated at the time ; not until age 
 and successive mutilations had injured the palace of 
 Fontainebleau was its real usefulness apparent. En- 
 
234 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 gravings alone remain to prove how much talent was 
 employed during the Renaissance. But for Jacques 
 Androuet du Cerceau's collection of engravings in his 
 book on the ' Best Buildings of France/ we should 
 know nothing of a number of castles now destroyed, 
 or of the precious monuments which rose up on every 
 side in every corner of France in the sixteenth cen- 
 tury. Without the engravers named above, we should 
 know none of Primaticcio's works. Time and the 
 hand of man have destroyed or damaged the admi- 
 rable paintings by the Florentine artist on the walls 
 of Francis I.'s palace ; and it would be a great honour 
 for the engravers of this famous school if they had 
 done nothing but preserve the remembrance of it. 
 But they have another title to glory no less honour- 
 able. They gave an impulse to French artists which 
 no fellow-countrymen would have done ; and we must 
 remember that we have to thank the gallant engravers 
 of Fontainebleau, in a great measure, for that school 
 which was subsequently founded with such unequalled 
 success by the engravers of France. 
 
 While prolific and untiring decorators were vieing 
 with each other in covering the walls of Fontainebleau 
 with scenes from mythology in a style which com- 
 bined that of the Italian, Flemish, and French schools, 
 an art entirely national was coming into fashion at 
 Court, and spreading throughout France. We allude 
 to portrait-painting. We know that the beautiful 
 series of portraits produced in the sixteenth century 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRA NCR. 2 3 5 
 
 are said to be traceable to Flanders, and that John 
 Van Eyck and Hans Memling have been named as 
 the sponsors of this art in France. But without any 
 intention of detracting from the merits of the portraits 
 by these Flemings, we must assert that the style of 
 the French artists differs entirely from theirs. Van 
 Eyck and Memling painted every portion of the 
 human form, even the smallest details, with great 
 care ; the French, on the contrary, give the general 
 outline, care nothing for details, and think only of 
 rendering the human face with all its spirit, life, cha- 
 racter, and individuality. Little do they care for the 
 processes employed, or for the complete sacrifice of 
 their own personality. The crayons ascribed to Clouet, 
 Quesnel, and Dumontier are admirable. Their sim- 
 plicity is marvellous ; it is difficult to say how they 
 are done ; the paper is scarcely covered, the tones are 
 blended with incomparable perfection, the detail of 
 the work escapes us ; they seem to have been pro- 
 duced by a breath, a breath fixing the life and ex- 
 pression of the face, which, after the lapse of three 
 centuries, has lost nothing of its freshness or of its 
 grace. 
 
 Engraving could not entirely master the difficulties 
 of such works ; the genius of the artists who practised 
 it was powerless before the striking truth of these life- 
 like portraits. Obliged to give outline and shading 
 in strokes, the artist could, indeed, render the style of 
 the drawing and the appearance of the face, but to 
 
236 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 give the harmonious aspect of the originals was 
 beyond his powers. Jean Rabel, Thomas de Leu, 
 Leonard GualtLer, Pierre Daret, Claude Mellan, and 
 Michel Lasne, the best artists, interpreted the designs 
 entrusted to them, each in his own way, with great 
 practical ability and knowledge of drawing. But they 
 never really transferred to metal the exquisite charm 
 of these unrivalled crayon drawings. Jean Rabel's 
 engravings prove that he was himself a painter and 
 skilful designer ; he excelled in rendering the face and 
 character of all his models. He has given us natural 
 portraits of Remi Belleau, Antoine Muret, the presi- 
 dent DeThou, and the chancellor De 1'Hopital ; they 
 are like what history leads us to believe, we feel in 
 looking at them that Rabel has left us true and 
 favourable likenesses. Although his engraving is 
 somewhat timid and inexperienced, it faithfully renders 
 the design, and never shows awkwardness or want of 
 knowledge of drawing. Thomas de Leu never sur- 
 passed Jean Rabel, although he was a far more skilful 
 engraver. His ability only injured his drawing by 
 making it laboured. We must thank him for putting 
 the names of those from whom he took his models 
 under many of his plates. This precaution establishes 
 the anthenticity of great masters' works, and rescues 
 many artists from oblivion. Isai'e Fournier, James 
 Blame, Jacob Bunel, Darlay, G. Guibert, Quesnel, 
 Daniel and Pierre Dumonstier, are indebted to him 
 for all or part of their fame. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 237 
 
 The chief merit of Thomas de Leu was the faithful- 
 ness with which he copied the painter's work. It is 
 difficult to choose amongst the many portraits en- 
 graved by Thomas de Leu. The skill is about the 
 same in all, there are few faults in the work ; his por- 
 traits all show great knowledge of physiognomy and 
 correctness of drawing. His likenesses of Pierre de 
 Brach, Barnabe Brisson, of Gabrielle D'Estrees, or of 
 Antoine Caron, are of equal merit ; the delicacy of the 
 expression and the clearness of the engraving is the 
 same in all. At first Thomas de Leu was influenced 
 by the pompous compositions and monotonous en- 
 gravings of Wierix ; he profited, it is true, by his 
 excellent portraits, but copied his faults as well as his 
 good points. Fortunately, he soon turned from ascetic 
 subjects to nature, and when he addressed himself 
 either directly or through masters, to the human 
 figure, he brought out works far superior to his cold 
 engravings after poor compositions without beauty or 
 grandeur. 
 
 Leonard Gualtier, who engraved about an equal 
 number of vignettes and portraits, was the contempo- 
 rary of Thomas de Leu, and we may almost say his 
 rival. Being neighbours, the two artists often took 
 the same persons' portraits. Their styles were different. 
 Leonard Gualtier's work was less condensed than that 
 of Thomas de Leu ; his strokes were deeper and wider 
 apart ; he caught a likeness equally well, but his por- 
 traits were harsher and less pleasing than those of Leu. 
 
238 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Briot, Jean Picard, and Jaspar Isac, who imitated 
 the style of Thomas de Leu and of Leonard Gualtier, 
 tried, but without success, to reproduce the works of 
 the skilful crayon designers of the sixteenth century. 
 Their drawing was poor, and their engraving un- 
 pardonably dull. The faces of the figures hardly 
 stand out from the copper, so harsh and inadequate is 
 the engraving. Jacques de Fornazeris, who may be 
 the same as Isai'e Fournier, after whom Thomas de 
 Leu engraved, recalls the style of the master more 
 than any contemporary. He has reproduced some 
 French designs of the sixteenth century with delicacy 
 and sufficient exactness ; and engraved a good many 
 vignettes. Finally, Jacques Granthomme and Charles 
 Mallery were too anxious to imitate Flemish works to 
 be included in the French school. Their works re- 
 semble the engravings of Wierix, and never have any 
 attempt at individuality. 
 
 To continue this uninterrupted list of portrait-takers 
 who are such an honour to the French school, we 
 must pass on to the seventeenth century, and consider 
 Pierre Daret, Claude Mellan, and Michel Lasne, of 
 whom we have before spoken, and who were under 
 Louis XIII. what Thomas de Leu and Leonard 
 Gualtier had been under Henry IV. Few persons of 
 any celebrity or importance escaped these experienced 
 artists. Unfortunately, although they drew well, their 
 style of engraving was very unpleasing. Pierre Daret, 
 whose work with the graver was generally cold and 
 
Fig 24. Head of Christ. Engraved by CLAUDE MELLAN. 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN FRANCE. 241 
 
 monotonous, yet managed to reproduce very fairly the 
 Abbe of Saint Ciran, after Daniel Dumonstier. Claude 
 Mellan, who rather paraded his skill in drawing a full- 
 faced head of Christ with one unbroken stroke of the 
 tool, showed a happier taste in the portrait of Peiresc 
 and in some female faces after his own crayons. Our 
 attention is unfortunately called from the good draw- 
 ing to the wide and often monotonous lines of the 
 execution. 
 
 After his earliest engravings it is easy to see that 
 Michel Lasne for a time turned to foreign models in- 
 stead of being content with those close at hand. This 
 was a pity ; Frangois Villamene and the Sadelers 
 exercised an unfortunate influence over him ; and it 
 was not until late in life that he with difficulty freed 
 himself from it, and asserted his own independence. 
 It was about 1630 his first engraving bears date 
 1617 that he adopted his subdued style of cross- 
 hatching and working out the face which gained him 
 so high a position in the French school. The portraits 
 which belong to this new period, of Pierre Seguier and 
 Pierre de Marcassus after D. Dumonstier, of Strozzi 
 after Simon Vouet, of Brunyer and Evrard Jabach 
 after Vandyck, are remarkable for a firmness of 
 handling and knowledge of physiognomy rare amongst 
 French artists. Honesty of interpretation has not 
 excluded from the engraving life, likeness, or indi- 
 viduality. Unfortunately, at the end of his career, 
 Michel Lasne swerved from the right path. He was 
 
 R 
 
242 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 jealous of the success of Claude Mellan, determined 
 to imitate him, and proceeded to make his strokes as 
 wide apart as possible, and, to use an authorized ex- 
 pression, he manoeuvred so much, that he sacrificed 
 correct drawing to the useless display of his know- 
 ledge. In this mistaken endeavour, he lost his best 
 characteristic, the simplicity, not without energy, 
 with which he had formerly interpreted the character 
 and physiognomy of his portraits. 
 
 The artists whom we have been considering were 
 most successful with portraits, but they have never- 
 theless left some works in other styles which deserve 
 mention. They were not indifferent to passing events, 
 and took care to depict the most important of them ; 
 besides the wood-cuts of Perissim and Tortorel, we 
 know of some historical engravings by which we 
 understand engravings of battles, victories, or any 
 actions of a people or a sovereign signed by Thomas 
 de Leu, Leonard Gualtier, or Pierre Firens. ' The Con- 
 secration of Louis XIII. in the Cathedral of Rheims,' 
 ' The Consecration of Marie de Medicis,' ' Henri IV. 
 laying hands on those afflicted with the King's Evil,' 
 and a good many unsigned engravings of the same 
 kind are of real skill and rare correctness ; and in 
 addition to the interest which always attaches to a 
 contemporary representation of an historical event, 
 they are of value on account of their artistic composi- 
 tion and practical ability. 
 
 Up to this period we have not found France taking 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 243 
 
 the initiative in the art of engraving. Even when in 
 the hands of the best masters, French art had hitherto 
 remained under Flemish, Italian, or other foreign influ- 
 ence. But with the reign of Louis XIII. a new era 
 commenced for her ; it was then her turn to take the 
 lead, and to give both lessons and masters to foreign 
 countries. Artists anxious to complete their education, 
 or to establish their reputation, hurried to France from 
 every side. She developed talents and gave lustre to 
 reputations already acquired. Her influence on art 
 itself was ever on the increase, and even now fresh 
 successes are constantly proving that she still retains 
 the pre-eminence she then attained. 
 
 Jacques Callot, born in Lorraine, was influenced by 
 no one. His genius was thoroughly French, his style 
 entirely original, and he therefore occupies an ex- 
 ceptional position in the history of art. His life was 
 strange and worth relating. He was born at Nancy, 
 in 1 592 ; at twelve years old he set off secretly for 
 Rome with a band of gypsies, but being recognised 
 on the road by a merchant of Nancy, he was brought 
 back to his family and remained some time in his 
 native town. He again tried to escape, and was again 
 brought back by his elder brother, who met him in 
 a street of Turin. This perseverance convinced his 
 parents that resistance was useless, and they decided 
 to yield to his inclinations, and to send their young 
 son to Rome, a favourable opportunity presenting 
 itself. This soon occurred. In 1609 an ambassador, 
 
244 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 accredited to the Pope by Henry II., of Lorraine, was 
 willing to take charge of Jacques Callot, who had 
 already given proof of exceptional ability in a few 
 engravings. His stay in Rome decided his fate. 
 When in the Eternal City he is said to have at first 
 followed the lessons of Ant. Tempesta, probably with 
 his fellow countrymen, Israel Henriet and Claude 
 Deruet, who arrived before him. If he did join this 
 studio he could not have remained there long, for we 
 find no trace of the lessons he received in it, and the 
 best informed biographers say that Philippe Tho- 
 massin, a French engraver who had been established 
 in Rome for many years before Callot's arrival, was 
 his first master. Callot began with the study of line 
 engraving. In this style he executed several plates, 
 which show the influence and recall the manner of 
 Thomassin ; but as soon as he became master of the 
 process and was left to himself, he threw off this 
 control and acquired the entirely original style which 
 he never again lost. Callot remained for some time 
 at Florence, and was noticed by Cosmo II. de Medici, 
 who retained him near him and entrusted him with 
 the engraving of ' The Funeral of the Queen of Spain.' 
 He acquitted himself creditably of this commission, 
 and this first important work gave him considerable 
 reputation, which was increased and established by a 
 successful invention. He wished to give up line en- 
 graving, and find some mode of working better suited 
 to his prolific and ingenious spirit, to his ardent and 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 245 
 
 vivid imagination. Etching had, it is true, been 
 already practised by Albert Diirer, Parmigiano, and a 
 few other artists, but the process they employed was 
 inferior and uncertain. Callot set himself to work to 
 bring it to perfection. He spread a thick coat of 
 varnish on a moderately heated plate, thereby ob- 
 taining a uniformly even surface, upon which he could 
 draw as with a pen on paper. His genius did the 
 rest. He entirely discarded the graver, never again 
 to use anything but the needle ; he executed several 
 engravings of this kind at Florence, and returned to 
 Lorraine in 1622, preceded by a brilliant reputation. 
 He then engraved two series of twelve compositions, 
 called 'The Aristocracy' (La Noblesse), and 'The 
 People ' (Les Gueux), in which were displayed all his 
 great genius, all the spirit and unprecedented power 
 of his needle. He came to Paris in 1629, and there 
 again met his fellow-countryman Israel Henriet, who 
 was a trader in engravings, and, like almost all mer- 
 chants of the kind at that time, an engraver also. In 
 Paris he began a charming portrait of a celebrated 
 collector of engravings, Charles Delorme, which he 
 completed the next year at Nancy. 
 
 In 1633, on the entry of Louis XIII. into the chief 
 city of Lorraine, our engraver attracted notice by his 
 proud and noble patriotism. The king, having heard 
 of the artist's talent, proposed to Callot that he should 
 engrave the siege of Nancy. He refused without 
 hesitation, and his answer to the king has been trans- 
 
246 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 mitted to us by Felibien in his own words : " Sire, I 
 am a native of Lorraine, and I think I ought to do 
 nothing against the honour of my prince and my 
 country." He testified his horror of war in a still 
 more decided manner in his series of fine and sar- 
 castic original engravings known as ' The Miseries of 
 War.' In eighteen compositions, all most picturesque, 
 he depicted the unheard-of sufferings, the fearful 
 tortures his fellow-countrymen had been made to 
 endure throughout the struggle. Two years later, on 
 the 24th of March, 1635, after a long illness, during 
 which he produced several engravings, Jacques Callot 
 died, leaving no children. His wife's name was 
 Catherine Puttinger. A tomb worthy of his memory 
 was raised in his native town, and another etcher, 
 Abraham Bosse, of less inventive power, perhaps, but 
 able to go on with the master's work, has left us an 
 engraving of this mausoleum, which has the following 
 inscription in the centre : " A la Posterite. Passant 
 jette les yeux sur cette escriture, quand tu sgauras 
 de combien mon voyage a este advance, tu ne seras 
 pas marri que ie retarde un peu le tien : Je suis 
 Jacques Calot, ce grand et excellent calcographe, qui 
 repose en ce lieu en attandant la resurrection des corps. 
 Ma naissance fut mediocre, ma condition noble, ma 
 vie courte et heureuse ; mais ma renommee a este et 
 sera sans pareille ; personne ne m'a este esgal en toute 
 sorte de perfection pour le dessein et.la graveure sur 
 1'airain. Toute la terre a consent! aux louanges ex- 
 
Fig. 25. Portrait of CLAUDE DERUET. Etching by JACQUES C ALLOT. 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN FRANCE. 249 
 
 traordinaires qui men out este donnees sans que pour 
 cela je sois ja'mais sorti de ma modestie naturelle. Je 
 nasquis a Nancy, 1'annee 1594, et mourus aussi a 
 Nancy le 23* Mars 1635, au regret incroyable de la 
 Lorraine, ma patrie, et de tous les plus rares esprits 
 de notre siecle, et principalement de damoiselle 
 Catherine Puttinger, mon espouse qui pour un dernier 
 temoignage d'amitie m'a faict dresser ce tombeau. 
 Prie Dieu pour celuy qui ne te priera jamais de rien 
 et passe." 
 
 Abraham Bosse was born and worked at the same 
 time as Jacques Callot, but his career was much 
 longer. He is one of the most interesting of French 
 artists. His numerous works give most authentic 
 historical information on the costumes and manners 
 of the time of Louis XIII. His works on engraving 
 and architecture show an erudition rare amongst 
 artists, and give us information on the state of art at 
 a time when treatises by the trading classes were 
 certainly not common. His engravings have a charm 
 all their own, independent of the subject represented. 
 We must, however, make one reservation in our 
 favourable notice. Although in his ' Treatise on 
 Engraving ' Abraham Bosse testifies the truest respect 
 for Callot's invention, he unfortunately did not follow 
 the example of that master. Instead of merely using 
 the needle on copper, like a pen on paper, he too often 
 tried to imitate the strokes of the graver ; in spite of 
 this, however, his drawing was always spirited, and 
 
250 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 his compositions were generally well arranged. In 
 his charming series of costumes engraved after the 
 designs of the witty artist of Normandy, Jean de 
 Saint-Igny, who himself engraved a few plates, Bosse 
 has proved that it was from choice, not from incom- 
 petency, that he had recourse to the graver ; and the 
 freely-executed plates of these two series should be 
 reckoned among his best works. 
 
 Like most really original artists, Jacques Callot had 
 no immediate pupils, properly so called. His manner 
 was attractive to a great many artists, but not one 
 took direct lessons from the Lorraine master. Claude 
 Deruet alone may have received advice from him ; but 
 he was a painter, and only engraved three plates, 
 which show the influence, but scarcely the actual 
 intervention, of Callot. Nicolas Cochin, the elder, 
 engraved the backgrounds of their compositions for 
 different engravers, and evidently wished to imitate in 
 them the manner of Callot, but he did not attain to 
 anything like the same delicacy of handling. Stefano 
 della Bella, although born at Florence and educated 
 in Italy, was far more influenced by the engravings of 
 the Lorraine master executed in Florence, than by 
 the more majestic works of his Yellow-countrymen. 
 His works, prettily conceived and delicately executed, 
 are all of small subjects ; and when we say that they 
 remind us of Jacques Callot, we are giving them the 
 highest praise. 
 
 Sebastian Leclerc flourished later ; he was born at 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 253 
 
 Metz on the 26th of September, 1637, and died in Paris 
 on the 25th of October, 1714. He nevertheless pre- 
 served the remembrance of Callot, and in his small 
 original engravings of costumes he often reminds us of 
 the master whom France so justly counts among her 
 most illustrious children. 
 
 Lorraine gave birth to another of the most celebrated 
 engravers of the seventeenth century. He was a 
 painter, and only used the needle occasionally ; but 
 when he did employ it he produced masterpieces. 
 Claude Gellee, better known as Claude Lorraine, pro- 
 duced some etchings which have all the qualities of 
 his paintings. He distributed the light and diffused 
 the air in his landscapes with unrivalled success. His 
 two chief engravings, the ' Sunrise/ and the ' Cow- 
 herd,' are excellent" models for modern etchers of 
 landscapes. With the same easy grace his needle has 
 rendered the lucid water, the solid buildings, the leaves 
 quivering in the wind ; the air seems to pervade every- 
 thing ; the artist engraved as he would have painted 
 without caring about correct strokes and neat outlines. 
 He softens the tones before him whilst faithfully ren- 
 dering them, he takes his inspiration direct from 
 nature, and his poetic spirit does the rest. At no 
 time has landscape been treated with such majesty, 
 grace, and bold simplicity ; and whether he be con- 
 sidered as a painter or as an engraver Claude Lorraine 
 is undoubtedly the greatest interpreter of nature the 
 world has ever produced. 
 
254 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Claude Gellee stands alone in the French school. 
 The few imitators he had remained far behind their 
 master. Attention was called in another direction, 
 and engravers preferred to reproduce the works of 
 Simon Vouet, a figure painter, who was then much 
 sought after. When young, this artist had travelled a 
 great deal in England, Turkey, and Italy, and on his 
 return to France he soon became so famous, that his 
 reputation spread to the court, and Louis XIII. wished 
 to receive lessons in drawing from a master of such 
 renown. We can imagine how much this honour 
 added to the painter's popularity. Orders flowed 
 into Vouet's studio from all sides. All the great 
 nobles were anxious to possess paintings by him, or 
 wished him to decorate their palaces and reception- 
 rooms. Engravers, always attracted by a painter's 
 success, hastened to multiply his works. Simon 
 Vouet himself did not scorn the needle, he etched two 
 plates, 'David and Goliath' and 'The Virgin and the 
 Infant Jesus, to whom St. Joseph is presenting a bird,' 
 which we must own cannot have contributed much 
 to his renown. However, if he himself produced few 
 engravings, the husbands of his two daughters, Michel 
 Dorigny and Francois Tortebat, seemed to have de- 
 voted their existence to'spreading the renown of their 
 father-in-law. Of these two painter-engravers, Michel 
 Dorigny was by far the more skilful ; his easy and 
 sometimes bold needle rendered the limpid colouring 
 and the occasionally incorrect drawing of Simon Vouet 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN FRANCE. 255 
 
 with remarkable fidelity. He represented almost all 
 the important compositions of the painter with scru- 
 pulous exactness ; indeed, so great was Simon Vouet's 
 influence over his son-in-law, that Dorigny's original 
 paintings were mere fac-similes of his. Tortebat's 
 style was more decided less docile and less plastic. 
 His needle was heavy, his engravings almost without 
 charm. His first signed prints bear date 1664, his 
 last 1668. He evidently soon gave up engraving to 
 devote himself entirely to painting. 
 
 Frangois Perrier, Pierre Daret, Michel Lasne, and 
 Claude Mellan also belonged to the school of Vouet 
 and were influenced by him. Each one, however, had 
 his own peculiar style of engraving. Francois Perrier, 
 whose best piece is the portrait of Simon Vouet, was a 
 painter also. His other numerous engravings are 
 often poor, and fail to render the softness of the 
 paintings of the French school at the beginning of the 
 sixteenth century. We have already spoken of Daret, 
 Lasne, and Mellan, amongst the engravers of crayons. 
 We shall not review them again ; the blame or praise 
 already awarded applies equally to their line-engrav- 
 ings after Vouet or his imitators. We merely state that 
 we consider the esteem in which the works of these en- 
 gravers are held is somewhat exaggerated. Laurent 
 de la Hyre and Frangois Chauveau did not resist the 
 influence of the all-powerful master, but they freed 
 themselves in a measure from the yoke which op- 
 pressed the French school, and showed their inde- 
 
256 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 pendence in some engravings of exaggerated elegance, 
 which remind us of the school of Fontainebleau. They 
 both employed etching ; Laurent de la Hyre used 
 almost too fine and thin a needle, and Chauveau cut 
 into the copper rather too vigorously. He wasted his 
 powers also in working for publishers who were anxious 
 to profit by his proficiency, which was really great, 
 and who cared more that he should produce many 
 works, than good ones requiring care and reflection. 
 
 Whilst engraving in Paris was assuming a new and 
 independent style, a similar movement was going on 
 in the provinces. On all sides French engravers 
 arose who were decidedly original, although their 
 drawing was not very pure or their ideas on art very 
 refined. At Tours, Claude Vignon engraved a con- 
 siderable number of plates, the etching of which is 
 beautiful in spite of the inferior taste and style. At 
 Nancy, Jacques Bellange carried exaggeration of style 
 to its utmost limits, but his manner of engraving was 
 very easy and agreeable. At Mantes, Pierre Brebiette 
 produced some light and spirited engravings ; at Tou- 
 louse, the painter and poet Hilaire Pader drew some 
 original designs on copper, and published a translation 
 of the ' Treatise on the Proportions of the Human 
 Body/ by Giovanni Pablo Lomazzo, and a strange 
 book called ' The enigmatical Dream of the Speaking 
 Picture ' (Le Songe enigmatique de la PeintureParlante.) 
 At Chateaudun, Nicolas Chapron transferred to metal 
 some designs he had executed in Rome after the 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 257 
 
 paintings of Raphael in the loggie of the Vatican, he 
 appears to have understood these great works better 
 than any artist who has, as yet, arisen ; at Aries, 
 Nicolas Delafage engraved in a style somewhat like 
 that of Italy in the seventeenth century ; his figures 
 of the Virgin are skilfully executed, but they are not 
 very remarkable. Indeed we might find one or two 
 artists in almost every province who successfully em- 
 ployed engraving which had now become acclimatised 
 in France. 
 
 But all this provincial enthusiasm was not enough. 
 Art requires a higher education than all France could 
 give to achieve any great success ; and, therefore, 
 artists who had their reputation at heart flocked to 
 Italy, the great and inexhaustible centre of the arts, 
 to study at Rome those masterpieces of antiquity and 
 of the Renaissance, which remained to testify to her 
 former grandeur. 
 
 The greater number of these artists remained some 
 years in Rome, others established themselves there per- 
 manently ; among the latter was the immortal Nicolas 
 Poussin, the greatest artist France has ever produced. 
 As a painter he does not come within the range of our 
 criticism but his distinguishing qualities have been 
 rendered with such fidelity by some engravers that we 
 may form a really just idea of his talent by examining 
 plates after his celebrated compositions ; and this we 
 think is not the case with any other master. It is 
 because the beauty of his works consists in the 
 
 S 
 
258 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 arrangement and style of his figures, in the grandeur 
 of the lines, and the expression of the faces and 
 gestures rather than in the composition or the colouring. 
 We are aware that the master used a red preparation 
 for his canvases, which from the first injured his 
 colours, and gave them the sober, gloomy, sad ap- 
 pearance which they still retain ; the engraver had 
 not to contend with the different tints, as he could 
 but express general harmony by means of black and 
 white, and he. has, therefore, transmitted the master's 
 compositions to us with all their spirit and feeling, 
 without the unfortunate obscurity which often prevents 
 our grasping the meaning of the originals all at once. 
 Jean Pesne devoted himself to the reproduction of 
 Poussin's works, rendering to the French master the 
 same good service that Marc-Antonio did to Raphael, 
 with the difference that he worked from paintings, and 
 the engraver of Bologna from drawing, only. Jean 
 Pesne worked with docility under the eyes of the 
 master, and was well instructed in all the resources of 
 engraving. Ha obtained excellent results by means 
 of etching alone. His style is bold and sure, never 
 pedantic or laboured ; he was as much at his ease on 
 copper as on paper, proving afresh that it is necessary 
 to excel in drawing before excelling in engraving. To 
 Pesne we are indebted for rendering Poussin's works 
 in all their majestic beauty. He was equally suc- 
 cessful with subjects of every variety. He is never 
 inferior to his model, whether he is engraving the 
 
UII7BBSITT 
 

ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 261 
 
 ' Seven Sacraments/ the ' Trance of St. Paul,' or the 
 ' Triumph of Galatea.' He pays untiring attention to 
 the correctness of the figures or objects, and gives us 
 a faithful copy of the painting before him, thinking 
 far more of exactly rendering the master's work than 
 of parading his own manual skill. 
 
 How rare are these conscientious copies ! how few 
 instances of them are furnished by history ! Nicolas 
 Poussin was one of those painters who best inspired 
 engravers. 
 
 Gerard Audran, the most skilful draughtsman of 
 the French school, and evidently a master of drawing, 
 engraved the best work of Nicolas Poussin, which may 
 perhaps also be considered a wonder of engraving. 
 ' Time disclosing Truth ' is a magnificent composition 
 in which the painter put forth all his powers to prove 
 the injustice of his contemporaries towards him, and 
 it found an admirable interpreter in Gerard Audran. 
 " Using by turns the needle and the graving-tool, he 
 seems," says M. Denon, " to have employed these two 
 instruments to supplement each other like the different 
 tints under a painter's brush." The work is in fact so 
 beautifully blended together, that in looking at it we 
 see the composition only, and forget until we examine 
 it closely that the engraver's skill must almost have 
 equalled that of the painter, for him to have rendered 
 so faithfully the work he had undertaken. Although 
 Gerard Audran only occasionally placed his talent at 
 the service of Nicolas Poussin, and produced very few 
 
262 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 engravings after that master, he must still be classed 
 with Jean Pesne, and a female artist, of whom we shall 
 presently speak, amongst the chief of the engravers 
 who took their inspiration from Poussin's works. 
 
 Claudine Stella, niece of the painter, Jacques Stella, 
 was born at Lyons in 1634, and died at Paris in 1697. 
 It is rare to find a woman, even among the most 
 highly gifted, with sufficient strength of mind to iden- 
 tify herself entirely with work of an exalted kind, more 
 especially when that work requires an extended educa- 
 tion and a knowledge of the human mind such as in 
 our present state of civilisation is usually monopolised 
 by man. The genius of Poussin was of a masculine 
 type, and therefore Claudine Stella's engravings after 
 his works may be considered the more extraordinary. 
 Indeed, they show great knowledge of drawing, and 
 positively manly energy, and the execution is so easy 
 that .Wattelet has not hesitated to say, " No man 
 understood Poussin's true character as did Claudine 
 Stella." This statement appears to us exaggerated, 
 because we know the engravings of J. Pesne and 
 Gerard Audran ; it is, however, partly justified by the 
 ' Striking of the Rock,' after a picture which once 
 formed part ' ex Musaeo Anth. Stella, Parisiis.' This 
 plate, reproducing one of Poussin's most important 
 compositions, interprets the painting as faithfully as 
 possible. Tne sad expression of the weary longing to 
 quench their thirst, the joyful looks of those who feel 
 their spirit returning to them, are rendered with sur- 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 263 
 
 prising exactness ; and, but that the work in the first 
 proof was rather too metallic, we should unreservedly 
 agree with Wattelet that " Claudine Stella excelled all 
 engravers in rendering Poussin's colouring." 
 
 We have now named the chief engravers after 
 Poussin, but we should not be doing justice to his in- 
 fluence on the French school if we confined our notice 
 to works inspired directly by his compositions. His 
 pictures have never ceased to guide artists in search 
 of beauty and grandeur of style, and even now many 
 an excellent engraving takes its inspiration from 
 Poussin's works. Giovanni Dughet, Poussin's brother- 
 in-law, engraved his compositions, of which works the 
 best is the ' Assumption of the Virgin.' The Chevalier 
 Avice, of noble birth and an artist by choice, showed 
 talent in his engraving of the ' Adoration of the 
 Magi ' after the painting in the Museum of the 
 Louvre, and in a ' Group of Cupids playing on 
 the borders of a forest,' ' The Martyrdom of St. 
 Bartholomew,' engraved by Jean Couvay, shows more 
 skill in handling the graver than in interpreting 
 Poussin ; ' The Baptism of Christ ' by Louis de Cha- 
 tillon happily renders the appearance of the picture. 
 Gerard Edelinck, whose works are generally worthy of 
 all praise, and who was usually most skilful, failed to 
 obtain his ordinary success in his engraving of the 
 'Annunciation;' finally, Etienne Gantrel, Jean Len- 
 fant, Etienne Baudet, Antoine Gamier, Michel Natalis, 
 Jean Nolin, Pierre Van Somer, and many others often 
 
264 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 took their inspiration from Nicolas Poussin, and were 
 only worthy of notice when they had the good taste 
 to follow that master. Many an engraver who cannot 
 produce a good original plate, will execute a remark- 
 able work with an excellent model before him. 
 
 Nicolas Poussin certainly exercised a most useful 
 and lasting influence on the French school. Imper- 
 fect as they were, we must notice the efforts of those 
 artists who tried to restore the art which must always 
 conform to the eternal laws of beauty. They called 
 Poussin's works to their aid in their endeavour to 
 check the universal spread of bad taste and evil 
 tendencies. Peyron thought he could not better 
 illustrate his notions of reform than by recommending 
 the admirable design ' The Daughters of Jethro ' as a 
 model for beginners, and an example for masters. 
 This was but just homage to the artist who so suc- 
 cessfully studied antiquity. It would be unjust not to 
 refer the origin of the Renaissance, of which w r e are 
 speaking, to the greatest master of the French school. 
 Engraving also, though led astray for a time by frivo- 
 lous, though often witty compositions, began to aspire 
 to higher works ; and M. Boucher-Desnoyers, to quote 
 one amongst many contemporary engravers, has skil- 
 fully executed a plate, ' Eliezer and Rebecca/ a splen- 
 didly treated subject which will always be admired by 
 those who understand art. 
 
 A number of second-rate artists in the beginning of 
 the seventeenth century, whose works still deserve 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 265 
 
 mention, arose at the same time as these gifted 
 masters, with their lofty ideal ; these men devoted 
 their talent to preserving the memory of important 
 historical events, they copied the splendid castles of 
 their day in order to bequeath authentic records of 
 the dominant taste of their own age to their descend- 
 ants. They are, of course, more interesting to the 
 historian than to the artist, but are of some artistic 
 value also on account of the information they give 
 about their authors. If the work be badly engraved 
 the intelligence conveyed in it is probably incorrect. 
 If it be signed by an artist of talent it is most likely a 
 trustworthy representation of the monument or fact 
 depicted. We value highly the historical compositions 
 of Crispin de Passe, Heli Dubois, Jacques Callot, and 
 Abraham Bosse, on account of the celebrity of their 
 authors. The last-named, of whom we have before 
 spoken, was the most zealous of all in working at the 
 history and manners of his time. An historian of the 
 reign of Louis XIII. would lose much valuable in- 
 formation if he neglected to look carefully through 
 the numerous works of this engraver. 
 
 It would be the same with any one who should 
 attempt to give a history of French architecture, and 
 ignore the engravings of Claude Chatillon, Israel 
 Silvestre, or of Gabriel Perelle, three artists who 
 devoted their lives to copying the royal mansions and 
 principal castles of France. Their order of talent was 
 different, but their works are all executed with a con- 
 
266 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 scientiousness for which they are justly valued. Claude 
 Chatillon's engravings of views of the ' Hdtel de Ville 
 of Paris/ of the ' Hospital of St. Louis/ of the ' Hotel 
 de Nevers/ ' The Place Dauphine/ and ' The Sainte 
 Chapelle/ show us exactly the early state of these 
 monuments now destroyed or altered. By means of 
 the delicate and spirited engravings of Israel Silvestre 
 we are well acquainted with ' Rambouillet, near the 
 Gate of St. Antoine/ the property of the father-in-law 
 of Tallemant des Reaux, with the ' Old Chamber of 
 the Peers/ and the ' Church and Cemetery of the 
 Innocents at Paris ;' and Gabriel Perelle, whose 
 etching is less picturesque, but equally faithful, has 
 preserved the memory of many lost monuments, and 
 enabled us to fancy the original state of many grand 
 residences, which are now either mutilated or fallen 
 from their first estate. 
 
 Whilst engraving was falling into the hands of in- 
 ferior artists, and losing its high position everywhere 
 except in Flanders and Holland, French artists were 
 proving themselves more original than ever, and forcing 
 their way up to that high position from which they have 
 never since receded. That great master, Gerard Audran, 
 of whom we have previously spoken, was at the head of 
 the school. He belonged to a family of artists, and learnt 
 the first elements of his art in the paternal house. His 
 father, Claude Audran, was but an inferior engraver, but 
 fortunately he knew enough to guide a beginner. It 
 was under his direction that Gerard produced his first 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 267 
 
 engravings which showed no decided taste, and gave 
 no hint of the future works which were to come from 
 the master's hand. A visit to Italy in early life 
 settled his taste and expanded his mind. When he 
 went to Rome he already knew enough of drawing to 
 appreciate the works he saw there, and he had ac- 
 quired sufficient skill in using the graver to be able at 
 once to set to work profitably. Although he had 
 gained admission to the studio of Carlo Maratti, he 
 chiefly copied antique statues and the works of great 
 masters, and we can imagine that this style of working 
 improved him more than the lessons of his teacher. 
 
 During his stay in Rome, and whilst following the 
 lessons of Carlo Maratti, and drawing in the galleries, 
 Gerard Audran found time to engrave a charming 
 portrait of Jordanus Hilling, a ceiling painted by 
 Pietro da Cortona in the Sacchetti Palace, another 
 ceiling by the same artist in the Pamphili Gallery, 
 and four plates after Domenichino, ' David dancing 
 before the Ark,' ' Judith shov/ing the head of Holo- 
 fernes to the People,' ' Esther before Ahasuerus,' and 
 ' Solomon making Bathsheba sit upon his Throne.' As 
 they were executed with talent these engravings drew 
 attention in France to their author, and oh his return 
 he was at once chosen by Lebrun to engrave the 
 series of the ' Battles of Alexander/ which the first 
 painter of the king had just finished. Perhaps no 
 artist had ever been more worthy of a painter's confi- 
 dence. Full of earnestness and enthusiasm, Gerard 
 
268 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Audran set to work without delay, and at the end of 
 six years he had accomplished this really gigantic 
 task (1672 1678). He employed line-engraving and 
 etching alternately, and has rendered the original 
 paintings with such fidelity that we can still estimate 
 them at their true value, although time has almost 
 entirely destroyed their power and harmony. At the 
 same time that he was transferring these celebrated 
 compositions to metal he finished the ' Pyrrhus saved/ 
 after Nicolas Poussin, an admirable engraving which 
 procured for him the title of Member of the French 
 Academy, 1674. A few years later he attained the 
 highest rank in this illustrious society which is possible 
 to an engraver, he was named Counsellor. But instead 
 of abating, his activity was ever on the increase, and 
 his talent being now fully developed all his works 
 were masterpieces. 
 
 In addition to the engravings we have named after 
 Poussin and Charles Lebrun, we must mention as 
 exceptionally superior works by Gerard Audran, 'The 
 Burning Bush,' after Raphael ; ' The Martyrdom of 
 St. Gervais and St. Protais ;' ' The Aurora ;' and ' The 
 Martyrdom of St. Lawrence,' after Eustache Lesueur ; 
 1 The Plague of Egina ;' ' The Cupola of the Val de 
 Grace;' and 'The Ceiling of the King's Chamber at 
 Versailles,' after Pierre Mignard. A few engravings 
 after the statues of Michel Anguier, Gaspard de 
 Marsy, and Girardon, close our list of this indefati- 
 gable artist's excellent works. Until his death at 
 
ENGRA VI NG IN FRANCE. 
 
 Paris on the 26th' of July, 1/03, Gerard Audran 
 devoted his great talent to the fine arts. We have 
 also a treatise embellished with engravings by this 
 master on ' The Proportions of the Human Body, 
 after the finest Figures of Antiquity.' This work is 
 still worthy of the honour in which it has been held 
 since its publication (1683). 
 
 Gerard Edelinck, Robert Nanteuil, and Jean Morin, 
 superior artists of surprising ability, worked at the 
 same time as Gerard Audran. They addressed them- 
 selves more directly to the works of Charles Lebrun, 
 Pierre Mignard, and Philippe de Champagne ; but 
 they did not confine themselves entirely to their 
 paintings or designs. 
 
 Gerard Edelinck was born at Antwerp in 1640, but 
 he became naturalised in France by spending his 
 entire life in Paris, and by his acceptance of the title 
 of member of the Royal Academy there, which was 
 bestowed on him on the 6th of March, 1677. His 
 works are of such equal merit that it is difficult to 
 distinguish the earlier from the later engravings. 
 However, the portrait of Madame de la Valliere, 
 which was published by Balthasar Montcornet, a 
 publisher of the beginning of the reign of Louis XIV., 
 appears to us to have been one of Gerard Edelinck's 
 first works ; we are led to this conclusion both by 
 the publisher's imprint on the engraving and also by 
 a certain harshness of execution which the artist 
 would not have left unaltered had his powers been 
 
2;o WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 fully developed. The drawing and colouring are, 
 nevertheless, very well rendered. We can only speak 
 in the highest terms of the greater number of Ede- 
 linck's other engravings ; it would take us too long 
 to enumerate all his masterpieces ; we will be content 
 with naming * The Holy Family/ after Raphael ; ' The 
 Tent of Darius,' after Lebrun ; the portraits of Charles 
 Lebrun, Frangois Tortebat, Hyacinthe Rigaud, Paul 
 Tallemant, John Dryden, Fagon, Martin Desjardins, 
 and Philippe de Champagne. No artist succeeded 
 better in truthfully rendering life or in identifying 
 himself with the genius of others ; Raphael had no 
 more skilful interpreter, and the painters of the reign 
 of Louis XIV. gained greater renown through Ede- 
 linck's engravings of their works than they would 
 probably have done by their own unseconded efforts. 
 
 Robert Nanteuil, who lived near Gerard Edelinck, 
 usually drew the designs for his own engravings. 
 Many of his portraits have come down to us. Being 
 a very skilful designer, he, of course, easily transferred 
 his happy likenesses to copper. He could not give 
 the same vivid and powerful colouring as Edelinck, 
 but his manual dexterity was quite as great. He did 
 not at once acquire this skill ; before he produced the 
 masterpieces which earned him a glorious name, he 
 vacillated a long time, and tried to discover in the 
 works of his predecessors how he could best give 
 expression to all that he felt within him ; now he 
 employed stippling, as in the engravings of Jean 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 271 
 
 Boulanger ; now, like Claude Mellan, he used single 
 strokes with cross-hatching ; at intervals again, he 
 tried careful cross-hatching, following the outlines, 
 like his master and fellow-countryman, Nicolas Reg- 
 nesson ; and at last he began to assume his own 
 individual style, which consisted in modelling with 
 the greatest precision every shade in the face, and 
 employing different kinds of work for the other parts 
 of the engraving. In this manner he engraved the 
 portraits of Pomponne- de Bellievre, Gilles Menage, 
 Jean Loret, Lamothe le Vayer, of the Duchess of 
 Nemours, of J. B. Van Steenberghen, and some twenty 
 others, all equally perfect and admirable, which must 
 always continue to excite the admiration of artists 
 and men of taste. 
 
 In addition to the esteem in which Robert Nanteuil 
 is held on account of his works, the art of engraving 
 is truly indebted to him for the celebrated Edict of 
 1660, dated from St. Jean de Luz, which he obtained 
 from Louis XIV. By this edict, engraving was de- 
 clared free and distinct from the mechanical arts, 
 amongst which it had hitherto been unjustly con- 
 founded, and engravers, delivered from thraldom, 
 became independent. From this epoch they shared 
 the privileges of other artists. 
 
 The engravers of whom we have just been speaking 
 employed line-engraving exclusively, and obtained 
 marvellous results from this inadequate process ; 
 another equally celebrated engraver, however, con- 
 
272 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 fined himself almost entirely to etching. Jean Morin 
 took lessons of Philippe de Champagne, and inter- 
 preted his paintings better than any of his contem- 
 poraries. He rendered the master's taste and style 
 without sacrificing his own, and his works share the 
 calm colouring and clearness for which the originals 
 are distinguished. He engraved many compositions 
 and landscapes, but he succeeded best with portraits, 
 although he did not, like Robert Nanteuil, give most 
 of his attention to them. 
 
 He was a devoted admirer of Anthony Vandyck, 
 and delighted to reproduce his portraits ; he partly 
 borrowed this artist's mode of engraving, improving 
 upon it, and modifying it to suit French taste. Having 
 given the outline and chief characteristics of the face, 
 he shaded the flesh with a quantity of stippling, which, 
 being mellowed and softened by the acid, produced 
 an excellent result ; but the process employed was so 
 difficult that Anthony Vandyck and Jean Morin are 
 the only two artists who succeeded with it. The 
 portraits of Cardinal Bentivoglio, the master's, best 
 work, of Antoine Vitre, of the Abbe de Richelieu, 
 Marguerite Lemon, J. F. P. de Gondi, N. Christyn, 
 and all the plates now so sought after of this artist, 
 are engraved by this peculiar process. Some engravers 
 tried to imitate Morin's style, but not one, not even 
 Jean Alix or Nicolas de Plattemontagne, who were 
 nearest to it, ever really succeeded in giving the 
 combined ease and firmness which make the master's 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 273 
 
 portraits real masterpieces. They obtained counter- 
 feits, nothing more, they missed the life-likeness which 
 is so striking in Jean Morin's engravings. 
 
 At no other time did France possess a greater 
 number of good engravers. Besides the chief masters, 
 who formed the public taste, there were many of less 
 talent, but of sufficient ability to attract the attention 
 of amateurs and men of taste. Francois de Poilly, 
 engraved the ( Vierge au Linge/ after Raphael, in a 
 very praiseworthy manner, and a great number of 
 portraits after French artists, which prove his know- 
 ledge* of physiognomy and his refined taste. Antoine 
 Masson carried line-engraving to the greatest per- 
 fection possible ; and if technical skill were everything, 
 he might tak'e one of the highest positions in the 
 history of art, but the French appreciate rather 
 correct drawing than manual dexterity in engraving, 
 and therefore we must class Antoine Masson amongst 
 secondary artists, and the only work of his to be 
 recommended is the portrait of Brisacier, which is 
 certainly his best engraving ; it is less laboured than 
 his others, and the face and expression are much better 
 rendered. 
 
 Peter Van Schuppen, though born at Antwerp in 
 1623, lived in France. He had very great ability, but 
 produced no exceptionally good works ; all his en- 
 gravings are well executed, his drawing is correct, but 
 the. style is not very exalted, nor is there real origi- 
 nality in his works. Nicolas Pitau showed more 
 
 T 
 
274 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 spirit in his portrait of Benjamin Prioli than in any 
 other of his engravings. In this plate we detect the 
 influence of his fellow-countryman, Gerard Edelinck, 
 and a faint remembrance of the great school inaugu- 
 rated at Antwerp under the control of Rubens ; 
 Pierre Lombard, born at Paris, also yielded to the 
 influence of Edelinck, and learnt from him a style of 
 colouring which suited well the portraits of the news- 
 man of Holland, Lafond, after Henry Gascard, and 
 those after Vandyck's beautiful works. Antoine 
 Trouvain, born at Montdidier about 1666, followed 
 the same direction, which he turned to good account 
 in his admirable portrait of ' Rene Antoine Houasse,' 
 which obtained him the title of Academician, and is 
 still considered his best work. Frangofs Spierre and 
 Jean Louis Roullet did not care sufficiently about 
 good drawing, and often copied worthless works, so 
 that they did not become as famous as their talent 
 for engraving would perhaps otherwise have made 
 them. Spierre's only justly valued work is ' The 
 Virgin and the Infant Jesus,' after Correggio. Boullet 
 is rescued from oblivion by his portraits of ' Sully/ 
 and of ' The Marquis de Beringhen,' after Mignard, 
 and that of ' Cam. Letellier,' after Largilliere. 
 
 Some of the best painters of the time of Louis XIV. 
 did not scorn to employ the needle, but they produced 
 few works worthy of attention. We will, therefore, 
 review them rapidly. Lebrun produced some etchings, 
 which add nothing to his glory, and remind us of 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 275 
 
 Vouet. Sebastien Bourdon was in turn attracted by 
 the artists of the Roman school of Parma and of 
 Venice, and transferred numerous compositions to 
 copper, betraying the influence which was dominant 
 at the time ; but though his style varied, his engraving 
 remained obstinately poor and cold. 
 
 The taste in Jacques Stella's engravings is inferior 
 to that in his paintings. The latter seemed to be 
 inspired by the lofty ideal and the refinement of form 
 of which such perfect examples are seen in the works 
 of Nicolas Poussin, whilst his etchings are hastily and 
 boldly conceived in a style not unlike that of Jacques 
 Callot. If an authentic signature did not exclude all 
 doubt, we could scarcely believe that 'The Ceremony of 
 Paying Tribute to the Grand Duke of Tuscany ' is from 
 the hand which painted the beautiful series of ' The 
 Passion,' the designs of which have been unhesitatingly 
 attributed to Nicolas Poussin by a modern editor. 
 
 Louis de Boullongne and Michel-Ange Corneille 
 followed the same track in engraving as in paint- 
 ing, and gave no proofs of originality in either. 
 Their engravings, like their paintings, prove their 
 great admiration for Poussin, whilst they give but a 
 poor opinion of their own imagination or knowledge. 
 Simon Guillain, who was one of the twelve elders of 
 the Academy of Painting, has left but one engraving 
 * The Cries of Bologna,' after Annibal Caracci ; and 
 something more would be required to give him the same 
 rank as an engraver which he holds as a painter. 
 
276 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 A landscape painter, Francis Millet, engraved three 
 etchings, which are now very rare, and are quite worthy 
 of his paintings. The composition is superior, and 
 they give a very good idea of the scenery round 
 Rome. The artist's needle, like his brush, has admi- 
 rably rendered the noble beauties of that glorious 
 neighbourhood, which have inspired and affected so 
 many artists. To conclude, Claude Lefevre, a most 
 talented portait painter, has engraved two or three 
 compositions, which would have made him famous, 
 even if his paintings did not exist. His own portrait, 
 executed with a masterly ease which reminds us of 
 Vandyck, is one of the most valuable of the en- 
 gravings of the French school ; indeed, we may say, 
 one of the finest portraits ever engraved in any 
 country. 
 
 It was during the reign of Louis XIV. that Mezzo- 
 tint Engraving, invented by Louis of Siegen, was most 
 successfully practised in France. The novelty of the 
 discovery and the valuable results attainable by its 
 means, attracted several French artists, who became 
 familiar with it as readily as with every other form of 
 art. A French artist of Flemish taste, Wallerant 
 Vaillant, borne at Lille in 1623, produced the first 
 really skilful mezzotint engravings under the guidance 
 of Prince Rupert, the friend and confidant of Louis 
 Siegen. Very few proofs were printed from them in 
 Holland, and, judging by the time which elapsed 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 277 
 
 between their publication and the adoption of the 
 new style by French artists, they were not known in 
 France until much later. Isaac Sarrabat was one of 
 the first who ventured to employ the unfamiliar pro- 
 cess in that country, and his boldness was successful. 
 His drawing was agreeable rather than grand, but his 
 tints were harmonious, and he has shown more know- 
 ledge and experience than could have been expected 
 from an artist employing a new process, in the portraits 
 of the engraver ' Etienne Gantrel/ after Largilliere ; 
 of the ' Marquis of Praslin ; and of ' G. J. B. de 
 Choiseul,' after H. Rigaud ; of the printer ' Alexander 
 Boudan ;' and in 'The Adoration of the Shepherds/ 
 after L. Herluyson. About the same time the cele- 
 brated amateur, Boyer d'Aguilles, had the greater 
 number of the pictures in his gallery at Aix repro- 
 duced in mezzotint by a skilful engraver, Sebastien 
 Barras, whom he retained near him. He himself 
 aided in the work, and executed a few engravings by 
 the same process, which show good will and a taste 
 superior to that of most amateurs, although, which is 
 not surprising, he had no great practical ability. 
 
 We must name a few French artists who occasionally 
 used mezzotint, although they did not confine them- 
 selves to it. The painter Andre Bouys engraved his 
 own portrait ; the colouring is skilful, indeed he 
 proved himself master of the process from the first ; 
 Jean Cossin, the author of a justly prized ' St. Agnes ;' 
 L. Bernard, who, in choosing the 'Virgin' of Cor- 
 
2;3 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 reggio, showed that he understood that coloured 
 works are better suited than others for reproduction 
 in mezzotint, and that chiaroscuro effects are better 
 rendered in it than delicate drawing or careful out- 
 lines ; finally, Bernard Picard, a cold and monotonous 
 engraver, who seems for once to have been carried 
 away by the charm of colour in his portrait of Demo- 
 critus, executed in 1698. 
 
 At the end of the seventeenth century we again meet 
 with the artists we have named above, now devoting 
 themselves to recording the events of the reign of 
 Louis XIV. Few remarkable works were published 
 at this time, although * engraving was more widely 
 practised than ever before, the fashion of carefully 
 engraving immense almanacks, giving the important 
 events of the past year in numerous medallions, was 
 introduced into France. These immense plates in which 
 the calendars occupied but a small space, were hastily 
 engraved by Edelinck, Poilly, Sebastien Leclerc, and 
 Albert Flamen, to meet the demand of the moment, 
 and added little to the reputation of their authors. 
 The same observation applies to the weighty theolo- 
 gical or philosophical theses dedicated to the king or 
 the nobles of the court by students. The argument is 
 surmounted by a portrait or a pompous allegorical 
 subject ; and though Robert Nanteuil, Francois de 
 Poilly, Pitau, or Gerard Edelinck may be the authors, 
 these plates are beneath the reputation of the above- 
 named artists. 
 

 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 281 
 
 In the reign of Louis XIV. numerous monuments 
 were raised testifying to the fertile imagination and 
 the science of the artists employed by that ostenta- 
 tious monarch. Jean Marot, an engraver, has left for 
 the benefit of posterity a representation of the greater 
 number of the buildings he saw erected. Thanks 
 to his intelligent care, we can easily give an account 
 of monuments now destroyed, and write the history of 
 French architecture in the i/th century. What Jean 
 Marot did for architecture Jean Lepautre, Jean Berain, 
 and Daniel Marot did for the decoration of interiors. 
 These three artists, who were equally skilful in dif- 
 ferent styles, have left a number of engravings which 
 are complete and authentic records of the ornamenta- 
 tion of apartments in their day. The abundant and 
 graceful arabesques which have escaped destruction in 
 the Palace of Versailles or the splendid mansions of 
 France are met with again in innumerable spirited 
 engravings by Lepautre, and bold and careful designs 
 by Berain and Daniel Marot. 
 
 During all the first half of the eighteenth century, 
 engravers were almost entirely occupied in render- 
 ing the works of one artist, Antoine Watteau, the 
 painter of festive gatherings and rural picnics. He 
 was a colourist after Rubens. No doubt his style was 
 very different to that of his favourite master, but he 
 never lost sight of, he never ceased to admire, the 
 splendid and attractive colouring of the master of the 
 Medicean Gallery. Rubens treated grand and stately 
 
282 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 subjects, Watteau only painted familiar scenes ; but 
 he had exceptional talent for decoration, he inaugu- 
 rated a new style, and in a great measure realised 
 the ideal he had conceived ; and all this entitles this 
 industrious and pleasing painter to the title of master. 
 He was not content with transferring the delightful 
 inventions of his fertile genius to canvas, he has left 
 some rare etchings, which are as spirited and delicate 
 as his paintings. He was very much sought after ; 
 all his contemporaries, and even his rival Frangois 
 Boucher, vied with each other in their eagerness to 
 reproduce his compositions on metal with all their 
 elegance and exceptional delicacy. The influence of 
 the school which was raised to honour by Gerard 
 Audran's excellent works was then at its greatest 
 height. Antoine Watteau was therefore just in time 
 to profit by the fortunate impulse given to engraving ; 
 he saw his best works faithfully reproduced, indeed 
 few masters of the French school were more fortunate 
 in their engravers. At no other time could France 
 boast of so many talented engravers, the names of 
 Benoit Audran, Laurent Cars, Nicolas Cochin, Michel 
 Aubert, Nicolas de Larmessin, Ph. Lebas, Jean Moy- 
 reau, Louis Desplaces, and of Bernard Lepicie, are 
 guarantees for correctness of reproduction. 
 
 We will now say a few words on the processes 
 employed by these engravers in their scrupulous 
 copies of painters' compositions. Like their master, 
 Gerard Audran, they began with etching, and only 
 
Fig. 29. A Costume. Etching by A. WATTEAU. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 285 
 
 used the graver after the outline was correctly drawn 
 by the aquafortis, they then retouched the parts 
 which were to stand out, shaded the figures, finished 
 off the accessories, never sending their plates to the 
 printer until they were sure that their work corre- 
 sponded exactly with the painting before them. We 
 are indebted to this mode of proceeding for some 
 remarkable works, and although the greater number 
 of Watteau's paintings have now disappeared, we are 
 fortunately still able to appreciate this most spirited 
 master, to whom posterity was for so long indifferent. 
 Amongst these many highly gifted and faithful 
 engravers of the eighteenth century there are some few 
 who deserve special mention. Laurent Cars, for 
 instance, who was born at Lyons in 1702, and died at 
 Paris in 1771, gave proof of his adaptive talent and 
 great facility in his ' Venetian Fetes ' and ' Fortune- 
 teller' after Watteau, and in ' Hercules and Omphale ' 
 after Francois Lemoine. Nicolas de Larmessin ren- 
 dered the ' Pilgrims of the Isle of Cythera ' by Watteau 
 with admirable fidelity, and obtained admission to the 
 Academy by his portrait of ' Guillaume Coustou ' after 
 Jacques de Lien ; Jean Moyreau, who reproduced 
 almost all the works of the Dutch painter, Philip 
 Wouverman, softened his style a little in copying 
 the paintings of his contemporaries ; Louis Surugue 
 had the good sense to take all his models from living 
 masters, who could guide him, and this precaution 
 saved him from ever producing inferior works ; he was 
 
286 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 quite equal to rendering the . paintings of Antoine 
 Coypel, Frangois Boucher, G. B. Pater, or Watteau, 
 and he often gave a harmony to his engravings which 
 the originals did not possess ; finally, Girard Scotin, 
 who spent the greater part of his life in England, in 
 his engravings after Watteau of the ' Pleasures of the 
 Ball,' the ' Hardships of War,' ' Le Lorgneur' and 'La 
 Lorgneuse/ and the ' Cascade,' proves that his correct 
 drawing and plastic graver were uninjured by his 
 having worked for'publishers who were not particular as 
 to what works they ordered from him. But he owes 
 his fame to copies of superior models, for his works 
 produced in England would not have made him cele- 
 brated. Watteau's imitators were equally attracted 
 by the works of Boucher, Lancret, and Pater, and as 
 ready to reproduce them. They had some qualities 
 in common with' those of Watteau, and they sold well. 
 If these engravings after relatively inferior artists are 
 less admired by connoisseurs than those after Watteau, 
 it is the fault of the paintings rather than of the 
 copies, for the artists were in all cases scrupulously 
 faithful to their models. Boucher's designs, which 
 were much run after, led his fellow-countrymen to 
 introduce a style of engraving which had not hitherto 
 been practised in France. We allude to the fac-simile 
 reproductions of drawings which copy even the faults 
 and mistakes of the artist. Giles Demarteau, Jean 
 Charles Francois Bonnet, Christophe Leblond, and 
 Gautier Dagoti, struggled, each by a special process, 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 287 
 
 to obtain in engraving an exact reproduction of a 
 sketch or of a picture, and they sometimes succeeded. 
 Although these fac-similes cannot deceive experienced 
 men accustomed to study works of art, they give so 
 just an idea of the originals that it is possible by their 
 means to study the master's style and follow his mode 
 of working. 
 
 Jean Baptiste Simeon Chardin, who stood almost 
 alone in the eighteenth century, but has had many 
 imitators since, attracted engravers, who rendered the 
 firmness of his painting and the easy grace of his 
 figures with praiseworthy fidelity. Bernard Lepicie 
 must be counted amongst those who best caught the 
 expression of the face in Chardin's works. His 
 engravings after the ' Teetotum/ the ' Raker/ and the 
 ' Governess ' are very correctly designed, and have as 
 harmonious an appearance as the originals. Laurent 
 Cars, Charles Nicolas Cochin, Fillceul, Lebas, and 
 Surugue also took their inspiration from Chardin's 
 works. Whether these engravers worked under the 
 master's supervision, or were so imbued with admira- 
 tion of his bold and fascinating paintings that they 
 required no assistance, we may assert without fear of 
 contradiction that few artists were so fortunate as 
 Chardin in their interpreters. 
 
 Several French painters of the eighteenth century 
 took the needle into their own hands and produced 
 some etchings quite equal in point of merit to their 
 paintings. The Coypels, Noel (1628-1707), Antoine 
 
288 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 (1661-1722), Noel Nicolas (1688-1734), and Charles 
 Antoine (1694-1752), used etching. None of them 
 left engravings worthy of notice. Their works of this 
 kind are little more than sketches, and it would be 
 unfair to judge of these painters by their hasty 
 etchings. Honore Fragonard, whose numerous paint- 
 ings, long neglected, are now overrated, was a clever 
 engraver, and deserves to rank high amongst the 
 many witty artists of the eighteenth century. His 
 four ' Bacchanals/ and his ' Armoire,' not to speak of 
 other compositions, have earned him this distinction. 
 He did not think much of the exact form of objects 
 or figures, but he expressed life happily. He gene- 
 rally treated frivolous subjects only, and we must 
 admit that he invented them with great facility. 
 
 Gabriel de St. Aubin drew all that took his fancy. 
 He made clever and spirited sketches of all that most 
 interested him in every collection of works of art 
 which he visited. He appears to have been an intel- 
 ligent observer who foresaw with what avidity the 
 smallest historical facts relating to the eighteenth 
 century would one day be sought after. lie used the 
 needle with as much ease as the pencil. His ( View 
 of a Saloon in the Louvre in 1753,' (Vue du Salon du 
 Louvre en 1753), the 'Fair of Bezon' (La Foire de 
 Bezon),' ' The Burning of the Fair of St. Germain 
 (LTncendie de la Foire St. Germain)' and the ' Thea- 
 tre of the Tuileries (Le Spectacle des Tuileries),' 
 are all executed in a delicate and sprightly manner 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 289 
 
 Small as they are they please and amuse us, because 
 they truthfully and unpretendingly reproduce the 
 spots which St. Aubin knew so well. Jean Baptiste 
 Pierre engraved several of his own designs, and pre- 
 served the memory of a Chinese masquerade got up 
 at Rome in 1735 by the pensioners of the Academic 
 de France. His best etchings are four compositions 
 suggested to him at Subleyras by La Fontaine's tales, 
 ' Brother Luke ' the ' Courtisane Amoureuse' (the 
 Amorous Courtesan), the * Falcon,' and ' Brother 
 Philip's Geese.' Loutherbourg passed a great part of 
 his life in England, and in this long absence from 
 France he compromised his national originality, and 
 some of his engravings seem to have been inspired by 
 Hogarth rather than by any French artist. Antoine 
 Rivalz was born at Toulouse in 1677, and died in 
 1735. He embellished the ' Treatise on Painting/ by 
 Bernard Dupuy du Grez, with four etchings which 
 remind us more of Lebrun's manner than of that of the 
 pleasing masters of the eighteenth century. Hubert 
 Robert executed in a very picturesque and spirited 
 manner a series of twelve engravings, the ' Soirees of 
 Rome,' dedicated to a female artist, Marguerite Le- 
 comte. He took lessons of Claude Henri Wattelet, 
 and with him engraved a number of etchings of no 
 great merit, which might be signed by either the pupil 
 or the master. Wattelet, the author of the ' Dictionary 
 of Painting,' justly valued on account of the compre- 
 hensive information it contains on art and artists of 
 
 U 
 
2QO WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 all times and countries, and its just and clear criticisms, 
 was but an inferior painter, better able to recognise the 
 talent of others than to exercise personal influence 
 over artists. Thomas Desfriches was born at Orleans, 
 and was scarcely more than an amateur, although he 
 took some spirited views on the banks of the Loire. 
 L. C. de Carmontelle, a writer of merit, engraved 
 some portraits with great intelligence, showing rare 
 knowledge of physiognomy. The Count of Caylus, an 
 archaeologist and celebrated man of letters, drew with 
 ease, and devoted his talent to reproducing a number 
 of designs of antique objects, and engraving a few 
 original compositions. He had not, it is true, any 
 great appreciation of antiquity, or a very profound 
 comprehension of masterpieces, but his works are 
 illustrations of many different styles, and he evidently 
 had a true love of beauty. One quasi-royal hand 
 deigned to practise engraving we allude to the Mar- 
 quise de Pompadour. Besides a number of engravings 
 after lithographs by Jacques Quay she has signed 
 three or four plates which would not be unworthy of 
 famous engravers. In them we see children blowing 
 soap bubbles, drinking milk, or resting in the country, 
 and they are engraved with so much ease that we 
 should not be much surprised if it should turn out 
 that Boucher, Cochin,- or some other master, had aided 
 the powerful marchioness, and for politic reasons 
 allowed her name to appear at the foot of the work 
 instead of his own. 
 
ENGRA VING IN ERANCE. 291 
 
 We have already said that the French were parti- 
 cularly successful with portraits. In the eighteenth 
 as in preceding centuries artists carefully preserved the 
 likeness of every person of rank or talent in their day. 
 Engravers sprung up around every distinguished 
 painter, eager to reproduce his works. The Drevets, 
 father and son, generally took their models from 
 Hyacinthe Rigaud and Nicolas de Largilliere, and 
 their engravings may be said to be in all respects 
 worthy of the original works. 
 
 Pierre Drevet, the father, studied in the school 
 which immediately succeeded that inaugurated in 
 France by Nanteuil and Edelinck ; he conceived the 
 idea of rendering in their full size the masses of 
 drapery which surround and almost overwhelm the 
 figures in the original painting. Of his many works 
 we will notice the portraits of 'Jean Forest,' after 
 Largilliere, of * Andre Felibien,' after Rigaud, and 
 of ' Hyacinthe Rigaud,' after a painting by the master 
 himself. The engraver copied the best works only, 
 and was fully equal to his great task, rendering these 
 pictures so instinct with life, with manly energy. 
 
 The portrait of Bossuet by Pierre Drevet, the son, 
 after Rigaud, immortalises the name of the engraver, 
 and gives a most exact likeness of the great orator. 
 We like to fancy the illustrious prelate standing, 
 leaning on his Oraisons funebres, his episcopal robes 
 wrapped majestically around him, captivating the 
 crowd or the royal assembly he is addressing by his 
 
292 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 noble presence ; and the engraver, doubtless inspired 
 not only by Rigaud's superb portrait, but also by the 
 grandeur of the man himself, has produced a master- 
 piece worthy to rank with the finest engravings of the 
 French school. Pierre Drevet, the son, employed 
 processes much resembling those used by his father. 
 He too used the graver alone, but it was so completely 
 under his control that it adapted itself readily to the 
 exigencies of different forms and styles. His stuffs 
 always fall in rich and heavy folds, they are most 
 artistically arranged and engraved in wide strokes, 
 whilst the head and hands, which require greater pre- 
 cision of outline, are expressed by finer and closer 
 lines, which allow of more perfect and condensed 
 shading, bringing the important parts of a portrait 
 into relief. Claude Drevet, who flourished later, em- 
 ployed the same process which his relations had raised 
 to honour, with the important difference that his line en- 
 graving was often cold and disagreeably monotonous. 
 The engravers of whom we have spoken produced 
 many portraits after Rigaud or Largilliere, but other 
 painters also supplied them with excellent models, we 
 will name : Jean-Marc Nattier, Louis Tocque, Maurice 
 Quentin de la Tour, Jean Siffred Duplessis, Jacques 
 Aved, and Tournieres ; Jean Daulle, whose work with 
 the graver was certainly brilliant, took the Academy 
 by storm in 1742, by his engraving of ' Hyacinthe 
 Rigaud painting his Wife's Portrait.' Jacques Beau- 
 varlet made the mistake of overloading his plates with 
 
' ,.. . 
 
 ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 293 
 
 monotonous lines. His portrait of the sculptor Bou- 
 chardon obtained him the title of Academician. It is 
 neither his best engraving nor an exceptional work. 
 Jacques Balechou, whose style much resembles that 
 of Beauvarlet, executed with some talent the portrait 
 of M. de Julienne holding a paper on which Watteau's 
 face is seen, after a painting by J. B. de Troy. This 
 engraving is really superior to his more celebrated one 
 after Vanlop's ' St. Genevieve tending her Flock.' 
 
 John George Wille and George Frederick Schmidt 
 were both natives of Germany, but established them- 
 selves in France at an early age, and produced their 
 celebrated works in that country. Our notice of them 
 must be brief, as we have already spoken of them 
 amongst German artists. Wille engraved numerous 
 portraits after Tocque and De la Tour, and several 
 compositions after Terburg, Dietrich, and his son 
 Peter Alexander Wille. His work is excessively neat, 
 almost too much so, and his engravings have a weari- 
 some metallic appearance, which does not do justice 
 to the original paintings. French artists have never 
 been guilty of either of these faults. Wille's figures, 
 draperies, and furniture are all equally harsh ; in 
 looking at his prints we seem to have the glittering 
 lines and shining hollows of the plate itself, before us. 
 We must, however, admit that his execution shows 
 rare talent. G. F. Schmidt shared the faults and 
 talent of Wille ; he too was an excellent line engraver, 
 and many of his works justify his renown. 
 
294 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Two brothers, Pierre Charles and Frar^ois Robert 
 Ingouf, engraved together a numerous series of por- 
 traits which show little originality or practical skill. 
 Charles Nicholas Cochin (Paris 1715 1788) engraved 
 profile portraits, in round medallions, of all the great 
 men of his day. The painter took great pains to give 
 individuality to each face, but the real value of the 
 work is obscured by the tiring monotony of so many 
 heads engraved in the same circle. The engravings of 
 Etienne Ficquet, Pierre Savart, and Jean Baptiste 
 Grateloup stand with regard to portraits in the same 
 relation that miniatures do towards historical painting. 
 These artists engraved, with the aid of a very strong 
 magnifying glass, some very pleasing portraits, which 
 are now highly prized. Ficquet, the most skilful of 
 the three, has left very good likenesses of Moliere, La 
 Fontaine, Corneille, and Boileau. P. Savart, like 
 Ficquet's other pupils, could not attain to the delicacy 
 of his master's works, and his name is now almost for- 
 gotten. J. B. Grateloup was so enamoured of fine 
 strokes that he tried to imitate with the graver the 
 work produced by the rocking tool balanced on the 
 metal ; he spent his whole life over nine engravings, 
 and we do not wonder that he became blind when we 
 examine his portrait of Bossuet after Rigaud's paint- 
 ing, which, should it possess no other merit, has that 
 of being a feat of great dexterity. 
 
 In the eighteenth century appeared a new style of 
 illustration until then unknown, we allude to vignettes. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 295 
 
 They were small, it is true, but well suited to the 
 literature of that period. By a vignette we under- 
 stand an engraving of small dimensions illustrating a 
 text, a poem, or a romance. Artists produced such 
 spirited and clever vignettes that a taste for them was 
 created, and scarcely a book appeared which did not 
 contain several plates intended to fix on the mind of 
 the reader the principal scenes in the book. Hubert 
 Gravelot, who was undeniably the best designer of 
 vignettes, illustrated, as we should say now, the 
 ' Moral Tales of Marmontel,' the ' Decameron ' of 
 Boccaccio, and the ' Works of Corneille.' The grace 
 which distinguished his compositions was faithfully 
 rendered by his engravers, Laurent Cars, J. Ph. Lebas, 
 Cl. Duflos, Choffart, and Aug. de St. Aubyn. It is 
 true that the designer has represented the heroes of 
 Corneille and Boccaccio in rooms decorated in the 
 fashion of his own day, with gilded ceilings and deco- 
 rated with flowers ; but we can forgive these anachro- 
 nisms on account of the spirited composition of the 
 whole, and the faithful record the artist has left us oi 
 the interior decorations of his time. In these finely 
 conceived and well drawn engravings we have compre- 
 hensive information of the manners and customs of 
 the French in the eighteenth century, that age of rapid 
 decline and general recklessness. Eisen drew less 
 correctly than Gravelot, but holds a good position 
 nevertheless. His designs in the ' Metamorphoses of 
 Ovid/ engraved by Nic. Ponce, Delaunay, Baquoy, 
 
296 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING, 
 
 Ghendt, and Noel Lemire show both inventive power 
 and ability in interpreting the ideas of others. P. P. 
 Choffard was pre-eminently successful in composing 
 and engraving designs for tail-pieces and head-lines ; 
 invitation cards, addresses, or frames for maps, and 
 his skill in these inferior works did not prevent him, 
 when occasion required, from drawing in an agreeable 
 manner several compositions the subjects of which he 
 took from contemporaneous writers. A few years 
 before his death he published a ' Notice of the Art of 
 Engraving in France.' In it he not only proves his 
 practical ability, but also his love of his profession and 
 his respect for the masters who preceded him. This 
 work, small as it is, contains some very wise observa- 
 tions, which are valuable from such an artist as Chof- 
 fard. Marillier, Augustin de St. Aubin, Noel Lemire, 
 Delvaux, Tilliard, Simonet, and Longueil, engraved 
 their own and others' designs. Their works show that 
 they were all influenced by Gravelot and Eisen, but 
 many have also considerable individual merit. Moreau 
 the younger at first followed the example of his pre- 
 decessors, and produced some excellent and spirited 
 vignettes at the end of the eighteenth century ; but 
 unfortunately he was afterwards led astray by an evil 
 influence which altered his style and seemed to para- 
 lyze his powers. His engravings in the 'Songs' of 
 Laborde, the ' Judgment of Paris,' a poem by Imbert, 
 and the ' Good Soldier,' by Boussanelle, sparkle with 
 wit and are arranged with ease, whilst his engravings 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 297 
 
 for the ' Holy Bible ' and the ' Metamorphoses of 
 Ovid ' are pretentious and laboured. When Moreau 
 composed the vignettes for the latter works, David 
 was the reigning master, and his reforms were largely 
 influencing the taste and style of the French school. 
 Moreau the younger, vainly endeavoured to go with 
 the stream, he could not conform to rules so different 
 from those which had guided his early efforts, and in 
 the attempt he entirely, or nearly, lost the dexterity, 
 the spirit, and the elegance for which he had been 
 famed. 
 
 These designers of vignettes, who have left us such 
 trustworthy records of interior decoration in the 
 eighteenth century, were not equally successful with 
 architecture. Decorators by profession, such as 
 Gilles Marie Oppenort, Juste Aurele Meissonnier, 
 Babel, and Balechou have, however, left some en- 
 gravings of their designs, which are good guides to 
 the student of the style of that period. We must not 
 now detain the reader by discussing the singular ten- 
 dency of the eighteenth century, their contortions of 
 even the smallest mouldings, and their dislike of a 
 straight line, which was one of the peculiarities of the 
 art of this period ; we will merely notice, that in 
 default of superior taste and love of simplicity, the 
 architects of that day were certainly most skilful 
 decorators, and the artists we have named above were 
 good interpreters of their productions, and have trans- 
 mitted exact and complete records of their works. 
 
298 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 We have purposely refrained from speaking of Jean 
 Baptiste Greuze at the same time as Watteau, Lancret, 
 Pater, and Chardin. He belonged to the school of 
 the eighteenth century indirectly only ; his works, 
 with the exception of his portraits, are pompous and 
 theatrical. His best subjects are taken from domestic 
 life, but he did not altogether succeed with them. 
 The ' Paternal Malediction,' the 'Village Bride,' the 
 ' Reading of the Bible,' the ' Paralytic waited on by 
 his Children,' are pure melodrama with him, and he 
 seems to have missed the simplicity and the home- 
 liness which, in the eighteenth century as now, must 
 have characterised family life. In painting, he con- 
 trasted colours without entirely blending them. Some 
 engravers endeavoured to imitate him. Jean Jacques 
 Flipart (1723-1782) employed etching almost entirely, 
 and tried to counterfeit the bold dashes of a thick 
 brush with a needle, using the graver merely to deepen 
 the coloured parts and to finish off the engraving. 
 His best engravings, the 'Village Bride,' the 'Para- 
 lytic,' and the ' Twelfth Cake,' are in this style. P. C. 
 Ingouf worked in the same manner, and succeeded 
 equally well. The ' Peace of the Household ' and the 
 ' Good Teaching ' show practical ability, and an evi- 
 dent desire to be faithful to the painting. Jean Mas- 
 sard profited by the lessons of his master, George 
 Wille, and gave proof of talent in the ' Broken Pitcher/ 
 the ' Benevolent Lady/ and the ' Well-loved Mother/ 
 Jean Charles Levasseur produced good engravings of 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 299 
 
 the 'Stepmother/ the 'Destroyed Will/ the 'Little 
 Scapegrace/ and ' Youthful Study/ which give a very 
 just idea of Greuze's paintings. Numbers of engravers 
 contributed greatly to the fame of this artist's works, 
 and he was most fortunate in finding so many skilful 
 interpreters in his own time. Great and exaggerated 
 as was Greuze's success, his conventional and preten- 
 tious manner of treating domestic joys and woes was 
 imitated by few. Not more than three or four artists, 
 J. E. Schenau, Et. Aubry, and P. A. Wille, took their 
 line from him ; but after this brief delusion, a new era, 
 inaugurated by Louis David, began for art, and models 
 were sought for in the works of antiquity. Engraving 
 followed the example of painting ; it left for ever the 
 quick and easy style, and once and for all aspired to 
 compositions of a high order, such as suited the 
 earnest, reflective, and docile genius of the French. 
 
 Nevertheless, the return to the study of the antique 
 was not accomplished in a day. So radical a change 
 required a transition state. Liberated society, long 
 oppressed, was unsettled for a time, and it was the 
 same with art. The Count of Caylus was the first to 
 endeavour, by his writings and engravings, to make 
 the beauties of antiquity and of the Renaissance 
 known and appreciated. Jean Francois Peyron was 
 equally zealous in the good cause. He engraved some 
 of Poussin's works, and brought out original composi- 
 tions in the same style. Joseph Marie Vien followed 
 up Peyron's efforts, and assumed the subdued manner. 
 
300 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 He attracted many young artists by his talent, but he 
 could not carry out the noble work. He has but the 
 honour of having guided the first efforts of the artist who 
 was to exercise such long and despotic influence over 
 French art, and to lead it on to its glorious destiny. 
 We allude to Jacques Louis David, who had very 
 many pupils, but, strange to say, is perhaps the only 
 one of the great masters who did not attract engravers 
 anxious to reproduce his works and to share his 
 renown. 
 
 The Revolution so entirely absorbed public atten- 
 tion, that, during the Republic, art was exclusively 
 occupied with the events of the day. The chief aim 
 of engravers was to supply the public with news, and 
 they generally rapidly etched the outlines of their 
 subjects, leaving the rest to professional colourists, 
 who added flat tints to each proof. These coarse 
 representations are of no artistic value, but they may 
 be consulted with profit by an historian interested in 
 the smallest actions of a great nation in a state of 
 transition. Some few artists excelled in this style of 
 engraving, and produced creditable works. Duplessis 
 Bertaux, compared by his contemporaries to Callot, 
 engraved an immense number of the events of the 
 Revolution. His etching was delicate, often spirited ; 
 he was most skilful in arranging complicated compo- 
 sitions, but when he had to deal with larger figures 
 than usual his power deserted him, and his drawing 
 became heavy and very incorrect. In this he resem- 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 301 
 
 bled his predecessors, the engravers of vignettes, who 
 thought more of general harmony than of correct 
 detail. 
 
 Louis Philibert Debucourt (1755 1832) was the 
 cleverest of the engravers of the Revolution. In the 
 years before and after the death of Louis XVI. he 
 engraved in colour the ' Garden of the Palais Royal/ 
 the ' Gallery of the Palais Royal,' the ' Shrubberies,' 
 the ' Compliment,' ' Annette and Lubin,' and several 
 other familiar subjects. He was of an observing and 
 inquiring mind, and had decided talent for engraving. 
 At first, he obtained excellent colouring by means of 
 successive plates ; his spirited drawing was well suited 
 to this process, which, in his hands, fulfilled all the 
 requirements of art. When the storms of the Revolu- 
 tion were over, Debucourt attempted a totally different 
 style, that of aquatint, with which, however, he was 
 not equally successful. He now turned to the works 
 of others in preference, and only occasionally pro- 
 duced anything original. He aged rapidly, and the 
 engravings of his early life alone are worthy of study. 
 
 At this transition period, Sergent Marceau also dis- 
 tinguished himself by some spirited engravings, but 
 he was not very fertile, and his works are now of little 
 value. The other artists of the Revolution are scarcely 
 worth mentioning ; their works are interesting as 
 referring to one of the most important eras of French 
 history, but not from an artistic point of view. Suffice 
 it to say that they are very numerous, and may be 
 
302 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 consulted in public institutions, where they have been 
 collected and carefully preserved. 
 
 Towards the end of the eighteenth century the art 
 of portrait-taking, which had been carried to such 
 perfection, was almost abandoned in France. An 
 engraver named Quenedey invented an instrument 
 which mechanically reproduced the human profile on 
 copper ; the artist had merely to touch up the work 
 of the machine, so that he could quickly and cheaply 
 supply the public demand. The invention became so 
 fashionable that few families were without likenesses 
 in physionotracy. Pupils and imitators took advan- 
 tage of Quenedey's success. Chretien in France, and 
 Saint Mesmin in America, engraved numberless por- 
 traits with a similar instrument, but as art was only 
 an auxiliary in the process, these likenesses were all 
 equally dull-looking, and very soon lost the brief 
 favour they had enjoyed. 
 
 Before closing our review of engraving in France, 
 we must speak of one artist who used etching himself, 
 and employed two very clever engravers. Pierre Paul 
 Prud'hon belongs as much to the nineteenth as to the 
 eighteenth century. He himself transferred his charm- 
 ing design of ' Phrosyne and Melidora ' to copper. 
 There are evident signs of inexperience in this 
 engraving. It is rather the work of a good painter 
 than of an engraver. Louis Copia and Barthelemy 
 Roger engraved Prud'hon's chief works under his 
 supervision, and seem to have entirely caught the 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 303 
 
 spirit of the painter. Their line-engravings, which 
 were finished off with well-distributed stippling, enable 
 every one to admire the ' French Constitution,' * Inno- 
 cence beguiled by Love/ ' Innocence preferring Love 
 to Wealth/ the 'Thirst of Gold/ and many other 
 equally superior works, which might otherwise have 
 been entirely lost, or known only to a few privileged 
 persons. 
 
 The reform effected in art by David extended to 
 engraving, which recovered its former splendour. 
 Charles Clement Bervic (May, 1756 March, 1822) 
 gave early proof of great talent for drawing. He was 
 one of John George Wille's best pupils. Like his 
 master, he employed the graver only, but his strokes 
 are easier and more symmetrical, and his engravings 
 have not the metallic appearance which we condemned 
 in those by Wille. We know how justly successful 
 were his ' Education of Achilles ' after Regnault, the 
 ' Rape of Deianeira ' after Guido, the ' Portrait of 
 Louis XVI' after Callot, and the ' Laocoon.' In 
 these engravings the artist has succeeded, by good 
 management, in concentrating the attention on the 
 chief parts of the composition, and they retain the 
 value which every well-studied work must have in the 5 
 eyes of good judges, and have been most useful exam- 
 ples to the modern French school of engraving. 
 
 Pierre Alexander Tardieu, who took lessons of 
 Wille with Bervic, was almost equally talented, 
 although he was less famous, and had few pupils. 
 
304 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 His masterpiece, the portrait of the Earl of Arundel 
 after A. Vandyck, may be considered one of the most 
 remarkable works of the French school. This engrav- 
 ing admirably renders the bright and harmonious 
 colouring of the great Flemish painter's work ; it is 
 executed entirely with the graver, and the same pro- 
 cess was employed as in Gerard Edelinck's justly 
 admired portraits. P. A. Tardieu brought out an 
 engraving after the dead figure of 'Lepelletier de 
 St. Fargeau/ painted by David for the Convention 
 Hall, which is now lost or carefully withheld from the 
 public. The plate fared no better than the painting, 
 it was destroyed, but the rare impressions from it 
 which have been saved give us a very high opinion 
 both of the original painting and of the engraver's 
 appreciation of it ; the general style is subdued, and 
 great knowledge of drawing is shown in the figure 
 stretched on the bed. Antoine Alexander Morel took 
 one of his best engravings from another of David's 
 designs for the Convention Hall, ' Marat in his Bath.' 
 We are indebted to the same artist for talented inter- 
 pretations of the celebrated compositions of the 'Oath 
 of the Horatii,' and 'Belisarius' by David. 
 
 Boucher Desnoyers' first works were of little value ; 
 he employed a disagreeable and feeble kind of stip- 
 pling, but later he conceived great admiration for 
 Raphael. He at once saw that profound study of 
 drawing and constant application could alone enable 
 him to cope with the difficulties of the great master's 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 305 
 
 paintings, and with rare courage he set to work and re- 
 commenced his education. He began by superintend- 
 ing the publication of a collection of copies from old 
 pictures, but as soon as he felt himself master of the 
 difficulties of drawing he ventured to engrave ' La 
 belle Jardiniere ' after the painting in the Louvre. 
 He was completely successful, and his fame was at 
 once established in a brilliant manner. Orders flowed 
 in on every side, and in a few years he successfully 
 engraved the ( Portrait of the Emperor Napoleon/ 
 that of 'M. de Talleyrand/ and 'Belisarius' after 
 Gerard, the ' Madonna della Sedia/ the ' Madonna di 
 Foligno/ the ' Vierge au Linge/ the * Vierge de la 
 Maison d'Albe ' after Raphael, and the ' Vierge aux 
 Rochers ' after Leonardo da Vinci. This fertility is 
 the more surprising when we note the care and deli- 
 cacy of the execution of the smallest details in Boucher 
 Desnoyers' engravings. He interpreted Raphael's 
 paintings better than any of his predecessors. The 
 * Transfiguration ' was his last work. When his powers 
 were already failing him, he determined once more to 
 testify his admiration for the great painter who had, 
 so to speak, filled his life. He therefore composed an 
 ' Appendix to the History of Raphael/ published by 
 Quatremere de Quincy, in which he showed his undy 
 ing love and unfading appreciation of the master of 
 his choice. 
 
 Boucher Desnoyers is not the only distinguished 
 engraver of the nineteenth century. Messrs. Forster, 
 
306 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 Martinet, Calamatta, and Mercuri rank high in the 
 school ; and M. Henriquel-Dupont, author of ' The 
 Lady/ after Vandyck, ' Lord Stafford/ ' The Portrait 
 of M. Bertin,' and the ' Hemicycle du Palais des 
 Beaux-Arts/ has recently shown in his ' Disciples of 
 Emmaus ' that his powers are still at their zenith, or, 
 if we may so speak of a master, that they are even 
 on the increase. This new work, executed with ease 
 and consummate skill, should, we think, be considered 
 a masterpiece, and as such it is a good study for 
 artists who still care to work at engraving, which is 
 now superseded, not because there is less talent than 
 formerly, but by the discovery of many mechanical 
 processes, useful in their way, but fatal to the art of 
 the engraver. At no other time were there more 
 skilful artists of every kind in France. Messrs. 
 Francois, Salmon, Rousseaux, Levasseur, and Huot 
 appear likely to reproduce the line-engraving of better 
 days. M. Gaillard devotes himself entirely to superior 
 works, and renders their character and their peculiar 
 beauty well on metal ; M. Leopold Flameng has 
 worked his way to the rank of a master ; in a diffe- 
 rent style of art Messrs. Gaucherd and Jules Jacque- 
 mart have been pre-eminently successful. On every 
 side engravers are working at etching, their only 
 fault being their over haste to multiply their works ; 
 had they a little more painstaking industry, a little 
 more study of drawing, they might become famous, 
 and even found a true school of etching in France. 
 
ENGRA VING IN FRANCE. 307 
 
 Our work must now close. We have seen how 
 French engraving drew its inspiration now from 
 Flanders, now from Italy, but speedily became a 
 national art with characteristic peculiarities. After 
 being devoted for some time to the works of others, 
 or to the reproduction of their own intelligent compo- 
 sitions, engravers turned to the engraving of history. 
 They submitted themselves to the influence of Poussin 
 and Lebrun. We have seen how they succeeded. 
 This grand style suited them admirably, and they 
 remained true to it in their interpretation of the works 
 of the painters then at the head of the school. For 
 a short while they turned aside, attracted by vignette 
 engraving, in which, however, they were most suc- 
 cessful. From the beginning of this century they 
 have again been devoted to historical engraving, and 
 to it they are indebted for their great renown. The 
 glory which surrounds French engravers is well 
 merited ; in their skilful, bold, and powerful works 
 have they not spread abroad the love of the beautiful ? 
 Did they not lead the way in the progress now being 
 carried out ? 
 
308 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 PROCESSES. 
 
 Engraving on Wood, Camaieu Copper-plate Engraving Line 
 Engraving, Etching, Dry Point, Combination of Etching and 
 Line Engraving, Mezzotint, Aquatint, Chalk style, Engraving 
 in Colour, Physionotracy, Heliography or Photography 
 Printing. 
 
 T)EFORE closing our history of engraving and 
 -D engravers it will be as well to say a few words 
 on the many different processes employed. Engraving 
 requires, above all, a thorough knowledge of drawing. 
 Without it, an engraver may become a skilful work- 
 man, but never an artist. All the great masters in 
 engraving have paid special attention to this branch 
 of their art, and the most skilful were also talented 
 painters. There are many different modes of en- 
 graving ; the most popular are wood-engraving, 
 line-engraving, and etching. The other processes are 
 derived from these. We will consider them sepa- 
 rately. 
 
PROCESSES. 309 
 
 Engraving on Wood. Wood-engraving is earlier 
 than any other kind, it even preceded printing, pro- 
 perly so called ; characters were engraved on wood 
 before moveable types were invented. The first works 
 embellished with woodcuts, the ' Speculum Humanae 
 Salvationis/ the ' Biblia Pauperum/ and others less 
 celebrated, appeared at a time when manuscripts 
 were becoming inadequate to supply the wants of the 
 increasing number 'of readers. So great was the 
 impatient and commendable curiosity awakened on 
 all sides, that copyists could not work fast enough 
 to supply the increasing demand ; and this led to 
 the printing from engraved characters on a block, 
 but it was not then that engraving itself was in- 
 vented. For the real origin of this art we must 
 go back to the -most remote times ; the Greeks, the 
 Egyptians, and the Romans cut inscriptions on wood 
 or metal for the instruction of the people ; but the 
 secret of printing was still unknown, and it was the 
 yearning for knowledge in the fifteenth century which 
 led to its discovery. At the end of a few years 
 moveable types were invented, and, of course, the 
 entire mystery of printing was solved. Pictures were 
 used from the first as being easily understood by the 
 people and likely to impress facts on their minds. A 
 wooden block was employed for taking off the first 
 engravings, such as had been used for printing " letters 
 of indulgence." Wood being easily cut, was at first 
 employed by the " picture carvers," so called because 
 
310 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 they cut strokes in the wood roughly, but which out- 
 lined their designs. The earliest woodcut with a 
 positive inscription bears date 1418. The only known 
 impression is in the Royal Library of Brussels. For 
 a long time the ' St. Christopher/ with an inscription 
 and the date 1423, was thought to be the first wood- 
 cut ; the invention is now, however, moved back five 
 years, and some new discovery may even yet fix it a 
 few years earlier. This question is but of secondary 
 interest to the history of engraving ; artists look 
 upon the first production of a really beautiful work 
 as the true beginning of an art. The religious pictures 
 brought out by poor engravers, who thought less of 
 artistic beauty than of exciting devotion, could scarcely 
 be called works of art. The work of the wood- 
 engraver is as follows : with a very sharp tool he cuts 
 away all those parts of the block of box or pear-tree 
 wood which the designer has not covered ; he must 
 follow every line of the artist's drawing, cutting away 
 the whites and leaving the blacks. He must never 
 work independently, unless the strokes are not indi- 
 cated, or a mere wash gives the shading in any object. 
 The tools employed by a wood engraver are called 
 burins, or gravers, scopers, needles, chisels, gouges, 
 scrapers, and mallets. 
 
 Engraving en Camaien. Engraving en camaieu 
 involves the same processes as wood-engraving, or, 
 rather, it is a superior kind of wood-engraving. It 
 may be as well to note how this superiority was 
 
PROCESSES. 311 
 
 obtained. When printing was first introduced the 
 only object was to multiply or counterfeit manuscripts, 
 and printers generally left a small space at the head 
 of each chapter for an ornamental initial letter or 
 title. This they supposed would contribute to the 
 illusion. Different tones were necessary to imitate 
 painting ; they therefore used blocks of wood inked 
 separately with different tones, and clamped together 
 so as to be printed from all in one. This combination 
 of blocks led to the invention of engraving en camaieu, 
 which rapidly improved in the hands of skilful artists. 
 A first block gave an exact outline of the form to be 
 produced, a second provided the shadows, and the 
 white of the paper was reserved for the lights. We 
 must observe that, by the aid of an exact register, the 
 second printing was taken upon the first impres- 
 sion. The first block gave the print the appearance 
 of a pen-sketch, and the second that of a washed 
 drawing. 
 
 We have now considered the process in which two 
 blocks were used and three tones obtained the out- 
 line, the shadow, and the light. This was the mode of 
 working at first ; later, by means of a greater number 
 of blocks, the tints were multiplied and numerous 
 gradations obtained. Two blocks were, however, 
 sufficient to produce what is called an engraving en 
 camaieu. The word camaieu thus applied is derived 
 from cameo, a stone in layers of different colours, 
 so much and so successfully employed in antique 
 gem engraving. 
 
3 i2 WONDERS OF ENGRAVING. 
 
 Copper-plate Engraving. This process is diametri- 
 cally opposite to that employed in engraving on 
 wood. In the latter all that is to be dark in the 
 impression is left in relief, in the former the dark 
 lines are cut into the metal plate, and the damp paper 
 is subjected to so much pressure that it sucks up the 
 ink from the hollows. Copper-plate engraving neces- 
 sitates long and careful work, and somewhat intricate 
 preliminary studies. Having made a correct drawing 
 of the composition or figure to be produced on copper 
 or steel, the engraver transfers his design to metal by 
 means of an exact copy on tracing paper, which gives 
 the outlines, the strong shadows, and the half-tints. 
 This done, the artist begins to trace with the graver 
 lines more or less deep, according to the amount of 
 light required. These first strokes form the foundation 
 of the subsequent work, and they require most correct 
 and careful drawing. Sometimes the lines are crossed 
 again, and yet again, to mark and shade the design 
 more effectually. A stroke may be introduced be- 
 tween parallel lines when the shadows require deepen- 
 ing, or in engraving flesh, to avoid the unpleasing 
 effect of too much lozenge or square-shaped shading. 
 Sometimes the engraver avoids too abrupt a transition 
 from light to shade by the use of dots, which soften 
 the tone. Such, briefly stated, are the labours of a 
 line-engraver, whose work is peculiarly well suited to 
 compositions of a high order. Some artists have used 
 the graver to improve the appearance and heighten 
 
PROCESSES. 315 
 
 the colouring of their etchings. We will speak 
 of them when we have considered the process of 
 etching. 
 
 Etching. We have said that line-engraving, which 
 requires slow and careful execution and complete 
 finish, is chiefly suitable for compositions of a high 
 order ; the easy and rapid process of etching, on the 
 contrary, is best adapted to homely and familiar 
 scenes or sketches, although artists of genius may 
 occasionally employ it for grand conceptions. The 
 process is as follows : The plate of copper or steel is 
 first moderately heated, and whilst it is held over the 
 fire it is covered with a very thin .coating of varnish 
 coloured with lamp-black and adhering to every part 
 equally. The engraver then marks out his sketch 
 with needles of varying size, according- to the depth 
 of the stroke required, working on the varnish as he 
 would on paper, with a pen or pencil. An incision is 
 thus made in the varnish wherever marks are to appear 
 in the print ; and the plate is protected in those parts 
 which are to be untouched and to be white in the im- 
 pression. A border of wax is now raised round the 
 plate, and nitric acid is poured over it, diluted with 
 water, lest it should affect the plate too much, which 
 would prevent the proper management of the biting 
 in. When the acid is on the plate, it is as well to 
 spread it about with a very soft brush, that it may act 
 equally in every part. When the acid has thoroughly 
 
316 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 done its work it is removed, the plate is cleaned, and 
 the varnish taken off with a rag soaked in spirits of 
 turpentine. The drawing, which before appeared on 
 the varnish, is now seen in sunken lines on the metal. 
 The plate goes to the printer, who takes a proof of it, 
 by which the artist can judge of his work. If any 
 
 Fig. 31. The Mountebank, etched by REMBRANDT. 
 
 parts are too much or too little accented, it is no great 
 matter, the faults of a first biting-in can easily be 
 remedied. A roller, saturated with varnish, is lightly 
 passed over the plate, which is thus entirely re- 
 covered ; the work is then gone over with the needle 
 wherever it requires strengthening, and bitten in 
 
PROCESSES. 317 
 
 again. Any lines too strongly bitten in the first 
 time are rubbed up with a burnisher, a round tool 
 used for that purpose. 
 
 So many facilities were attractive to painters, and 
 numbers employed etching ; it is the only mode oT 
 engraving which does not require preliminary study, 
 
 Fig. 32. Vanity, etched by J. CALLOT. 
 
 experience is all that is needed to give firmness of 
 hand and knowledge of effect, and this an artist who 
 can draw will rapidly acquire. Although this mode 
 of engraving is so very simple that any one may learn 
 it, those who have excelled in it are few. The drawing 
 being the chief thing, it is absolutely necessary to be 
 a skilful designer before becoming a good etcher 
 
3 1 8 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 It is essential, also, to have sufficient knowledge of 
 chiaro-oscuro to be able to obtain all the gradations of 
 light and shade by means of the black ink and the 
 white paper. It follows that distinguished etchers are 
 rare, and that in this, as in every branch of art, to 
 excel in it is the exception and not the rule. 
 
 Engraving ^vith the Dry Point. By this we under- 
 stand a process which generally accompanies, and 
 often gives finish to, etching. The artist draws on 
 the bare metal with a very sharp needle, thereby 
 raising a burr, which leaves a very soft and delicate 
 stroke. These burrs, which are so effective in Rem- 
 brandt's works, will not stand much printing from, and 
 soon disappear. This is why the first proofs of en- 
 gravings with a dry point are so much valued and 
 fetch so high a price at sales. 
 
 The Combination of Etching and Line Engraving. 
 This kind of engraving must be noticed in a history 
 of the art, because in it etching plays a secondary 
 and preparatory part only. The engraver transfers an 
 exact tracing of his design to the metal covered with 
 a coat of varnish, which is obtained thus : the copy is 
 pricked with a needle on a sheet of tracing paper, the 
 holes are filled with coloured powder, generally red ; 
 it is spread on the plate, and rubbing it with the nail 
 is all that is needed to make an impression of it on 
 the varnish. This first operation performed, the en- 
 
PROCESSES. 319 
 
 graver goes over the lines in the varnish with a steel 
 needle, passing over the clear parts and marking out 
 the shadows, in fact, leaving nothing to be done after 
 the biting in but the heightening, doubling or trebling 
 of the hatching, as occasion requires. The sculptor, 
 as we know, entrusts the rough hewing of the marble 
 for his statue to a workman, who gives the general 
 outline of the model supplied to him ; in the same 
 way the engraver often takes up and completes the 
 work in his own individual style when the mechanical 
 part is done, allowing some clever pupil to prepare 
 the plate and do the etching. 
 
 Mezzotint Engraving. Horace Walpole, anxious 
 to give the honour of the invention of this style to a 
 fellow-countryman, tells us, in his 'Anecdotes of 
 Painting/ vol. v. p. 161 (Ed. 1828), how Prince Rupert, 
 the nephew of Charles I., was led to its discovery when 
 living in retirement at Brussels, after the year 1649. 
 "Going out early one morning, he observed the 
 sentinel at some distance from his post, very busy 
 doing something to his piece. The prince asked what 
 he was about. He replied, the dew had fallen in the 
 night, had made his fusil rusty, and that he was 
 scraping and cleaning it. The prince looking at it, 
 was struck with something like a figure eaten into the 
 barrel, with innumerable little holes close together, 
 like friezed work on gold or silver, part of which the 
 fellow had scraped away. 
 
32O 
 
 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 " One knows what a mere good officer would have 
 said on such an accident ; if a fashionable officer, he 
 might have damned the poor fellow, and given him a 
 shilling, but the 'genie fecond en experiences ' from 
 
 33 
 
 -A profile Portrait, Mezzotint Engraving by Prince RUPERT 
 Palatine of the Rhine. 
 
 so trifling an accident conceived mezzotinto. The 
 prince concluded that some contrivance might be 
 found to cover a brass plate with such a grained 
 ground of fine-pressed holes, which would undoubtedly 
 give an impression all black, and that by scraping 
 away proper parts the smooth superficies would leave 
 the rest of the paper white. Communicating his idea 
 
PROCESSES. 321 
 
 to Wallerant Vaillant, a painter whom he maintained, 
 they made several experiments." 
 
 Unfortunately for the English historian, mezzotint 
 engraving had already been invented for several years, 
 and Louis of Siegen, a German officer, had employed 
 it in 1643, f r m " s portrait of Amelia Elizabeth, the 
 Landgravine of Hesse-Cassel ; and a certain Frangois 
 Aspruck had engraved a series of thirteen plates of 
 Christ and the Apostles, and one of 'Venus and 
 Cupid,' which all bear the date 1601, by means of 
 some process giving a result very similar to that 
 obtained from mezzotint. " Novo hoc in aere typi 
 genere" 
 
 In mezzotint engraving the copper or steel plate is 
 scraped with an instrument called a rocking tool, 
 which requires careful balancing. It is a semi-circular 
 steel tool much roughened at one end, which pene- 
 trates the metal and produces numberless little dents 
 very near each other. When the surface is equally 
 furrowed with this rocking tool, a scraper is used to 
 soften the ridges more or less as the lights are to be 
 stronger or fainter, and to remove them entirely when 
 high lights are required. This is quite a different 
 operation to that employed in other kinds of en- 
 graving. Instead of merely drawing all that is to 
 be shaded in the impression, those parts alone are 
 worked at which are to be removed or softened. 
 There is a danger of imperfect results from mezzotint 
 engraving. If not very carefully managed, the work 
 
 Y 
 
322 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 with the rocking tool may make the proof look 
 spiritless and confused, the transitions from light to 
 shade may so easily be slurred over that the greatest 
 precaution is needed to obtain good and pleasing 
 gradations of tone. Another thing which discourages 
 the use of mezzotint is that the plate will not bear 
 much printing from. After furnishing a few hundred 
 prints the roughness obtained by the rocking tool, 
 and which gives tone to the impression, becomes 
 crushed in the press, and in some parts even disap- 
 pears altogether. 
 
 Aquatint Engraving. This process resembles 
 mezzotint in its results, and is often confounded with 
 it, but it is in reality quite different. Instead of first 
 furrowing the plate with the rocking tool, the engraver 
 begins by tracing the outlines of his design on the 
 bare plate,. which he then sprinkles equally with very 
 fine sand or resin from a sieve. Resin is preferable to 
 sand or anything else, as it adheres readily to the 
 plate when slightly warmed. The acid slowly but 
 plentifully poured on to the surface thus prepared 
 corrodes all the imperceptible spaces between the 
 grains of resin, and this mass of similar and equi- 
 distant dots makes the print look soft and harmonious. 
 The tone produced resembles that of a washed 
 drawing to such an extent that the first aquatint 
 engravings by J. B. Leprince, the inventor (about 1787), 
 were often taken for washed drawings. The art has 
 
PROCESSES. 323 
 
 been perfected since the time of Leprince, and some 
 able artists have obtained admirable results from it. 
 
 The Chalk Style supplies a modern demand, and 
 was really invented by Francois and Dumarteau, al- 
 though the origin may be traced back to John Lutma. 
 The imitation in engraving of the effect of chalk on 
 the grain of the paper allows of the multiplication of 
 fac-simile copies of the handiwork of the greatest 
 masters, which are most accurate and excellent, and 
 therefore very useful to collectors and young artists, 
 serving them as models and guides, without which 
 they would err inevitably. To obtain these fac-similes 
 the engraver uses a revolving wheel or roulette, which 
 is a small cylinder of steel turning on an axle fixed 
 to a handle and proportioned to the size of the stroke 
 about to be produced. The outer part of this little 
 wheel is covered with sharp teeth, which bite the 
 varnished copper in several places at once. When 
 the aquafortis has acted on this first work, the artist, 
 with the same instrument, retouches on the bare copper 
 those parts he wishes to mark more strongly. A tool 
 with the end unequally roughened, which produces 
 similar effects to the roulette, is sometimes used. To 
 give the appearance of drawings in red or bistre, the 
 greater number of Francois and Demarteau's en- 
 gravings have been printed in red or brown, thereby 
 aiding the illusion. 
 
 Engraving in Colour naturally followed the chalk 
 
324 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 style, and the process is rather like that of engraving 
 en camateu. It was invented by James Christopher 
 Leblon, an artist of Frankfort, who conceived the idea 
 of printing on the same sheet of paper from plates 
 impregnated with differently coloured inks. By means 
 of an exact register he was able to print the colours in 
 the correct places. He obtained surprising results, 
 and executed a portrait of Louis XV. which at a dis- 
 tance might really deceive the most experienced eye. 
 To imitate drawings he employed the same process 
 as Frangois and Demarteau. The only difference be- 
 tween the two styles consists in the variation of tone 
 obtained by means of superposed printings. En- 
 graving in colour has been practised by many skilful 
 French artists. It has not succeeded entirely with 
 figures, but it is worthy of attention, as many subjects 
 from anatomy and natural history, and monuments of 
 many-coloured architecture, could not have been well 
 rendered without great expense by any other process 
 before the invention of chromo-lithography. 
 
 Physionotracy. At the end of the eighteenth century 
 a French artist named Quenedey invented a machine 
 by means of which he copied the human profile mathe- 
 matically. The outline alone was fixed on the copper 
 in one unbroken line, and the artist shaded and worked 
 out the shape with sufficient skill to give a certain 
 appearance of truth to the physiognomy. His inven- 
 tion had great success at first, but for a short time only. 
 
PROCESSES. 325 
 
 Photography. Photographic engraving is a modern 
 invention. To M. Niepce de St. Victor belongs the 
 honour of having discovered how to print a photo- 
 graphic proof like a copper-plate engraving. He was 
 the first to obtain satisfactory results, but he had the 
 advantage of the experience of many wise men and of 
 his uncle Nicephore Niepce, whose researches were 
 cut short by death. Photography has made great 
 efforts in this direction. Messrs. Riffaut, Ch. Negre, 
 Baldus, Durand, and Gamier have brought out excel- 
 lent proofs, obtained by some secret but evidently 
 very effective process, and we think we may now look 
 upon all difficulties as conquered. Still better results 
 will doubtless be obtained, and engravers, to whom 
 photography was a fatal blow, may console themselves 
 with the thought that there are some difficulties which 
 art alone can master, and with which the most perfect 
 mechanical process is unable to cope. 
 
 Printing. The printing of engravings, of whatever 
 kind, always requires great care. Wood-engravings, 
 generally combined with the text, are printed like 
 letter-press. In his ' Grammar of the Arts of Design/ 
 p. 695, Charles Blanc speaks with his usual clearness 
 of the care required in printing wood-engravings with 
 the text : " One thing is wanted," he says, " in early 
 woodcuts, the finish now given to them in printing by 
 a contrivance called decoupage. By attaching portions 
 of paper or pasteboard, of suitable thickness, to certain 
 parts of the tympan (a thick sheet of leather through 
 
326 WONDERS OF ENGRA VING. 
 
 which the pressure is applied to the wood block) 
 more or less pressure is obtained on the different parts 
 as required. If it be necessary to bring forward the 
 foreground of an engraving, a pad is applied to the 
 part corresponding therewith, and to throw back the 
 distance a thin slice of the pad is removed, which 
 softens the pressure, lessens the quantity of ink, and 
 thereby lightens the tone." 
 
 The process of printing is quite different in copper- 
 plate engraving. We have already stated that all 
 that is to appear in the proof is engraved in sunken 
 lines. The paper, which is first damped or soaked, is 
 pressed hard enough to suck up the ink from the 
 hollows. Having placed the plate over a fire which 
 slightly heats it, the workman fills the engraving with 
 ink in every part, he then carefully wipes the plate 
 with a pad of thick muslin, so as to remove the ink 
 where it is not wanted, and proceeds to rub whiting over 
 the metal with the palm of his hand until it is quite 
 bright. Thus prepared the plate is laid upon blankets, 
 the damp paper, which is to receive the impression, is 
 spread upon it, and with all its accessories it is passed 
 between the rollers, the flannels preventing undue 
 pressure, and a proof is obtained which must be care- 
 fully removed, as the ink makes it adhere a little to 
 the metal, and the paper is still damp. To remove 
 any ink that may have remained in the lines, the 
 printer cleans the engraving with spirits of turpentine, 
 and proceeds as before. 
 
I 
 
 "S 
 5 
 
 PH 
 
PROCESSES. 329 
 
 To omit nothing we ought perhaps to explain the 
 numerous processes by which peculiar effects are pro- 
 duced in printing engravings. But this would detain 
 us too long. Suffice it to state that the printer, work- 
 ing under the supervision* of the artist, may often be 
 of great service to him. This co-operation, however, 
 is only possible with etchings. In line-engravings 
 there is little room for skill or management, every- 
 thing is so completely finished that the printer has 
 nothing to do but to spread the ink equally upon the 
 plate so that the proof may exactly tally with the 
 engraver's work upon the copper. 
 
 Some painters who employed etching took the 
 trouble of printing their own engravings. By inking 
 some parts more or less strongly they obtained dif- 
 ferent degrees of strength. Rembrandt, the master of 
 etching, entrusted the printing of his engravings to no 
 one, he reserved that task for himself. His skill in 
 effects was so great that proofs taken from the same 
 copper differ entirely from each other. Some, filled 
 with ink and not much worked up, make the design 
 look dark and gloomy ; whilst others, lightly inked, 
 throw it out and almost flood it with light. 
 
INDEX OF ENGRAVERS' NAMES. 
 
 Aldegrever (Henry), 91, 145, 170 
 
 Alix (Jean), 272 
 
 Altdorfer (Albrecht), 145, 166 
 
 Amman (Jost), 145, 174 
 
 Andrea (Zoan), 28 
 
 Andreani (Andrea), 8 
 
 Androuet du Cerceau (Jacques), 234 
 
 Assen (John Walter van), 86 
 
 Aubert (Michel), 282 
 
 Audran (Benoit), 282 
 
 Andran (Gerard), 261, 262, 266, 
 
 267, 268, 269, 282 
 Agostino (Veneziano), 6r 
 A vice (Chevalier), 263 
 
 Babel, 297 
 
 Backuysen (Louis), HO 
 
 Baldini (Baccio), 16 
 
 Baldus, 325 
 
 Balechou (Jacques), 293 
 
 Baquoy, 295 
 
 Barbari (Giacomo de), 29, 35, 36 
 
 Barbe (Jean-Baptiste), 228 
 
 Barbieri (Giovanni Francesco) called 
 
 Guercino, 55 
 Barlow (Francis), 195 
 Baron (Bernard), 189 
 Ban-as (Sebastien), 277 
 Bartoli (Pietro Santo), 72 
 Bartolozzi (Francesco), 193 
 Baudet (Etienne), 263 
 Beatrizet (Nicolas), 69, 224 
 
 Beauvarlet (Jacques), 292, 293 
 Bega (Cornelius), 101 
 Beham (Bartholomew), 69, 91, 167 
 Beham (Hans Sebald), 145, 167, 
 
 168, 221 
 
 Bella (Stefano della), 250 
 Bellange (Jacques), 256 
 Berghem (Nicolas), 101 
 Bernard (L.), 277 
 Bernard (Salomon), 212 
 Bervic (Charles Clement), 180, 303 
 Binck (Jacob), 69, 168, 169 
 Bloemaert (Cornelius), 112, 130 
 Bloteling (Abraham), 118 
 Bocholt (Franz van), 157 
 Boillot (Joseph), 226 
 Bol (Ferdinand), 99 
 Boldrini (Niccolo), 8 
 Bolswert (Boethius of), 124 
 Bolswert (Schelte of), 124, 127, 
 
 128, 132, 135 
 Bonasone (Giulio), 63 
 Bonn (Jan of), 143 
 Bonnemer (Marin), 218 
 Bosse (Abraham), 249, 265 
 Both (Andrew), 105 
 Both (John), 105, 106 
 Botticelli (Sandro), 16, 19 
 Boucher (Fra^ois), 282, 286 
 Boucher-Desnoyers (Auguste), 264, 
 
 305 
 Bouchier (Jean), 227 
 
 2 A 
 
332 
 
 ENGRA VERS' NAMES. 
 
 Boulanger (Jean), 271 
 Boullongne (Louis de), 275 
 Bourdon (Sebastian), 275 
 Bout (Peter), no 
 Bouys (Andre), 277 
 Boyer d' Aiguilles, 277 
 Boyvin (Rene), 230, 232 
 Brauwer (Adrien), 100 
 Brebiette (Pierre), 256 
 Brescia (Antonio da), 28 
 Briot, 238 
 
 Brizzio (Francesco), 53, 70 
 Bry (Theodore de), 174, 175 
 Burgmair (Hans), 142 
 
 Calamatta (Luigi), 306 
 
 Callot (Jacques), 243, 244, 245, 
 
 246, 249, 250, 253, 265, 275 
 Campagnola (Domenico), 29, 32, 
 
 35 
 Campagnola (Giulio), 29, 31, 32, 
 
 35, 61 
 
 Canaletto (Antonio), 38, 39 
 Cantarini (Simone), called the Pesa- 
 
 rese, 54 
 
 Capellani (Antonio), 72 
 Caraglio (Jacopo), 62 
 Carmona (Salvador), 77 
 Carmontelle (L. C. de), 290 
 Carpi (Ugo da), 8 
 Carracci (Agostino), 50, 51, 52, 
 
 56,69 
 
 Carracci (Annibale), 50, 51, 52, 56 
 Carracci (Luigi), 50, 51 
 Cars (Laurent), 282, 285, 287, 295 
 Casa (Niccolo della), 224 
 Caxton (William), 183, 184 
 Caylus (Count of), 290 
 Chapron (Nicolas), 256 
 Chartier (Jean), 226 
 Chatillon (Claude), 265 
 Chauveau (Fra^ois), 256 
 
 Choffart (P. P.), 295 
 
 Chretien, 302 
 
 Claas (Albert), 91 
 
 Clint (G.), 196 
 
 Cochin (Charles Nicolas), 287, 290, 
 
 294 
 
 Cochin (Nicolas), 282, 287 
 Codore (Ollivier), 217 
 Collaert (Adrien), 92, 120 
 Copia (Louis), 302 
 Corbutt (C), 196 
 
 Coriolano (Giovanni Baptista), 70 
 Corneille (Claude), 222 
 Corneille (Michel Ange), 275 
 Cornelisz (Jacob), 86 
 Cort (Cornelius), 52, 70, 229 
 Cossin (Jean), 223 
 Cousins (Samuel), 198 
 Couvay (Jean), 189, 263 
 Coypels (The), 287 
 Cranach (Lucas), 141 
 Cruickshank (George), 205 
 Cruickshank (Isaac), 206 
 Cruickshank (Robert), 206 
 Cunego (Domenico), 72 
 Curenbert (Dirck Volkart), 92 
 Custos (Dominic), 175 
 
 Dalen (Cornelius van), 117 
 Daret (Pierre), 236, 238, 255 
 Daulle (Jean), 292 
 Daven (Leon, or Tiry), 231 
 Debucourt (Louis Philibert), 301 
 Dei (Matteo di Giovanni), 13 
 Delafage (Nicolas), 257 
 Delaunay (Robert), 295 
 Delaune (Etienne), 225 
 Delvaux (Joseph), 296 
 Demarteau (Giles), 286, 324 
 Dente (Marco) or Marco of Ravenna, 
 
 61 
 Deruet (Claude), 244, 250 
 
ENGRAVERS' NAMES. 
 
 333 
 
 Desfriches (Thomas), 290 
 
 Desplaces (Louis), 282 
 
 Dickinson (W.), 196 
 
 Dieterlin (Wendel), 177 
 
 Dietrich (Charles), 177 
 
 Dixon (John), 196, 198 
 
 Dorigny (Michel), 254, 255 
 
 Drevet (Claude), 292 
 
 Drevet (Pierre), the father, 291 
 
 Drevet (Pierre), the son, 291, 292 
 
 Dubois (Heli), 265 
 
 Duflos (Claude), 295 
 
 Dughet (Giovanni), 263 
 
 Dujardin (Karel), 102, 105 
 
 Dumoustier (Geoffrey), 232 
 
 Dunkarton (B.), 196 
 
 Duperac (Etienne), 225 
 
 Duplessis (Bertaux), 300 
 
 Dupre (Jean), 208 
 
 Durand, 325 
 
 Diirer (Albert), 30, 35, 42, 46, 56, 
 61, 84, 88, 91, 112, 140, 141, I43> 
 144, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 
 165, 166, 168, 170, 221, 245 
 
 Dusart (Cornelius), 89, 100, 101 
 
 Duvet (Jean), 222, 224 
 
 Dyck (Anthony van), 127, 129, 131, 
 132, 135 
 
 Earlom (Richard), 195 
 
 Edelinck (Gerard), 263, 269, 270, 
 
 274, 278, 291, 304 
 Esquivel (Manuel), 77 
 Eustache (William), 211 
 
 Faber (J.), 196 
 
 Faithorne (William), 186, 189 
 Falck (Jeremiah), 116 
 Fantuzzi (Antonio), 230 
 Felsing (James), 181 
 Ficquet (Etienne), 294 
 Fillceul (Pierre), 287 
 
 Finiguerra (Maso), 3, 9, 10, 13, 19, 
 
 148 
 
 Firens (Pierre), 228, 242 
 Fisher (E.), 196 
 Flamen (Albert), 278 
 Flameng (Leopold), 306 
 Flipart (Jean- Jacques), 298 
 Forster (Francois), 305 
 Fragonard (Honore), 288 
 Francia (Francesco Raibolini, 
 
 called), 13, 14, 49 
 Franck (Hans), 143 
 Franco (Battista), 70 
 Franois (Alphonse), 306 
 Fran?ois (Jean Charles), 286, 323 
 
 Gaillard (Ferdinand), 306 
 
 Galle (Cornelius), 120, 130 
 
 Galle (Philip), 120 
 
 Galle (Theodore), 120 
 
 Gantrel (Etienne), 263 
 
 Gamier, 325 
 
 Gamier (Antoine), 263 
 
 Gamier (Noel), 221 
 
 Gatti (Oliviere), 70 
 
 Gaucherel (Leon), 306 
 
 Gaultier (Leonard), 236, 237, 238, 
 
 242 
 
 Gautier-Dagoti, 286 
 Gellee (Claude), called Claude Lor 
 
 raine, 105, 106, 253, 254 
 Ghent (de), 296 
 Ghisi (Giorgio), 68, 69, 225 
 Gillray (James), 203, 204 
 Glockenton (Albert), 156 
 Godart (William), 211 
 Goltzius (Henry), in, 112 
 Gourmond (Fra^ois de), 218 
 Goya (Francesco), 88, 91, 92 
 Graf (Urs), 145 
 Granthomme (Jacques), 238 
 Grateloup (Jean Baptiste), 294 
 
334 
 
 ENGRA VERS* NAMES. 
 
 Gravelot (Hubert), 295 
 
 Green (V.), 196 
 
 Greuter (John Fred.), 70 
 
 Greuter (Martin), 175 
 
 Greuze (Jean Baptiste), 298, 299 
 
 Grozer (J.), 190 
 
 Grim (Hans Baldung), 144 
 
 Guidi (Raffaello), 70 
 
 Guillain (Simon), 275 
 
 Haids (the), 175 
 
 Hardouin (Gilles), 21 1 
 
 Hemrskerke (Martin), 92 
 
 Henriet (Israel), 244, 245 
 
 Henriquel-Dupont, 306 
 
 Heusch (William of), 106 
 
 Hirschvogel (Augustine), 173 
 
 Hodges (C. H.), 196 
 
 Hogarth (William), 199, 200, 203 
 
 Hogenberg (Francis), 231 
 
 Hollar (Wenceslas), 176, 177, 189, 
 
 195 
 
 Hondius (Henry), 115 
 
 Hooghe (Romyn de), 119 
 
 Hopffers (David, James, and Lam- 
 bert), 173 
 
 Hopffer (Daniel), 145 
 
 Houbraken (James), 119 
 
 Hoy an (Germain), 218 
 
 Huot (Adolphe), 306 
 
 Ingouf (Frangois Robert), 294 
 Ingouf (Pierre Charles), 294, 298 
 Isac (Jaspar), 238 
 
 Jacquemart (Jules), 306 
 
 Jegher (Christopher), 131 
 
 Jode (Pierre, the elder), 129 
 
 Jode (Pierre, the younger), 129, 
 
 130, 135 
 Jones (John), 196, 198 
 
 Keating (George), 198 
 Keller (Joseph), 181 
 Kerver (Thielman), 21 1 
 Kilians (The), 175 
 Koburger, 140 
 
 La Hyre (Laurent de), 256 
 Lanfranco (Giovanni), 53 
 Larmessin (Nicolas), 179, 282, 285 
 Lasne (Michel), 236, 238, 255 
 Lautensack (Hans Sebald), 173 
 Lebas (Jacques Philippe), 193, 282, 
 
 287, 295 
 Leblond (Jacques Christophe), 286, 
 
 324 
 
 Lebrun (Charles), 274 
 Leclerc (Jean), 218 
 Leclerc (Sebastien), 250, 278 
 Lecomte (Marguerite), 289 
 Lefevre (Claude), 276 
 Lefevre (Valentin), 37 
 Lemire (Noel), 296 
 Lenfant (Jean), 263 
 Leonardis (Giacomo), 40 
 Lepautre (Jean), 281 
 Lepicie (Bernard), 282, 287 
 Leu (Thomas de), 236, 237, 238, 
 
 242 
 
 Levasseur (Jean Charles), 298 
 Liefrinck (Wilhelm and Cornelius), 
 
 H3 
 
 Limosin (Leonard), 232 
 Lindt (Alexis), 143 
 Lippi (Fra Filippo), 21 
 Livens (John), 99 
 Lolli (Lorenzo), 54 
 Lombard (Lambert), 92 
 Lombard (Pierre), 274 
 Longhi (Giuseppe), 73 
 Longueil (Joseph of), 296 
 Loutherbourg (Philippe), 289 
 
ENGRA VERS NAMES. 
 
 335 
 
 Lucas of Leyden, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 
 
 156 
 
 Lutma (John), 323 
 Lutzelburger (Hans), 146, 147, 148 
 Luyken (John), 119 
 
 Mac Ardell, 196 
 
 Mair, 158 
 
 Mallery (Charles), 228, 238 
 
 Mantegna (Andrea), 25, 26, 27, 28, 
 
 29, 3, 3i, 3 2 > 3 6 43> 222 
 Marco of Ravenna (Dente), 61, 62 
 Margottini (Giacomo), 55 
 Mariller, 296 
 Marot (Daniel), 281 
 Marot (Jean), 281 
 Martinet (Achille), 306 
 Massard (Jean), 298 
 Masson (Antoine), 273 
 Master of 1406 . . 3 
 Master of 1446 . . 4 
 Master of 1451.. 4 
 Master of 1466 .. 148, 152, 154, 157 
 Master of 1480.. 86 
 Master of the Caducevs (Giacomo 
 
 de Barbari), 36 
 Master of the Crab, 91 
 Master of the Crossed Staves (Hans 
 
 Ulrick Vaechtlein), 144 
 Master of the Die, 64 
 Master of the Shuttle (Zwoll), 87 
 Master of the Star (or Dirck van 
 
 Staren), 90, 91 
 Master of the Streamers, 148 
 Matham (James), 112 
 Mathoniere (Denis of), 218 
 Matzys (Cornelius), 92 
 Mazzuoli (Francesco), called Parmi- 
 
 giano, 45, 46, 47, 48, 63, 245 
 Mecken (Israel van), 156, 157, 158 
 Meissonnier ( Juste- Aurele), 297 
 Meldolla (Andrea), 47, 48 
 
 Mellan (Claude), 189, 238, 255, 271 
 
 Merian (Matthew), 175, 176 
 
 Millet, 276 
 
 Milnet (Bernard), 2, 220 
 
 Mocetto (Girolamo), 29, 30, 35 
 
 Monaco (Pietro), 40 
 
 Montagna (Benedetto), 29, 35 
 
 Montcornet (Balthazar), 269 
 
 Moreau (the younger), 297 
 
 Morel (Antoine Alexander), 304 
 
 Morghen (Raphael), 73 
 
 Morin (Jean), 269, 272 
 
 Moyreau (Jean), 282, 285 
 
 Miiller (Christian Frederick), 181 
 
 Miiller (John), 112 
 
 Muntaner (Francisco), 77 
 
 Murphy (John), 196 
 
 Musi (Ag.) Agostino Veniziano, 61 
 
 Nanteuil (Robert), 186, 269, 270, 
 
 271, 278, 291 
 
 Natalis (Michael), 130, 263 
 Negker (Josse), 143 
 Negre (Charles), 325 
 Niepce de Saint Victor, 325 
 Nolin (Jean), 263 
 Nooms (Rene), orZeeman, no, in 
 
 Oppenort (Gilles Marie), 297 
 Ostade (Adrien van), 89, 100, 101 
 
 Fader (Hilaire), 256 
 
 Panneels (William), 137 
 
 Papillon, 219 
 
 Passarotti (Bartolomeo), 50 
 
 Pass (Crispin Van de), in, 265 
 
 Patin (Jacques), 228 
 
 Paul (S.), 196 
 
 Payne (John), 185 
 
 Pencz (George), 69, 169, 221 
 
 Peregrini da Cesana, 13 
 
 Perelle (Gabriel), 265 
 
336 
 
 ENGRA VERS NAMES. 
 
 Perissim, 217, 242 
 
 Perrier (Franois), 255 
 
 Pesne (Jean), 238, 258, 262 
 
 Peyron (J. F. P.), 264 
 
 Pfarkecker (Vincent), 143 
 
 Picard (Jean), 238 
 
 Pierre (Jean Baptiste), 289 
 
 Pigouchet (Philip), 211 
 
 Pilgrim (Vaechtlein), 144 
 
 Pitau (Nicolas), 273, 278 
 
 Pitteri (Marco), 39 
 
 Plattemontagne (Nicolas de), 272 
 
 Pleydenwurff (Wilhelm), 140 
 
 P6 (Piero del), 55 
 
 Poilly (Fran9ois de), 273, 278 
 
 Pompadour (Marchioness of), 290 
 
 Ponce (Nicolas), 295 
 
 Pontius (Paul), 124, 127, 128, 129, 
 
 131, 132, 135 
 Potter (Paul), 101, 102 
 Prevost (Jaques), 232 
 Prevost (Nicolas), 218 
 Primaticcio, 23, 229, 230, 232 
 Procaccini (Camillo), 50 
 Prud'hon (P. P.), 302 
 
 Quenedey, 302, 324 
 
 Rabel (Jean), 236 
 
 Raibolini (called Fran cia), 13, 14, 49 
 
 Raibolini (Giacomo), 49 
 
 Raibolini (Giullo), 49 
 
 Raimbach (Abraham), 194 
 
 Raimondi (Marc Antonio), 13, 14, 
 5> S 6 , 59 60, 6 1, 62, 63, 64, 65, 
 66, 68, 69, 70, 166, 229, 258 
 
 Ravenet (Simon), 192 
 
 Regnart (Valerian), 70, 229 
 
 Regnesson (Nicolas), 271 
 
 Rembrandt, 81, 82, 93, 94, 95, 96, 
 99, 1 10, in, 118, 119, 329 
 
 Reni (Guido), 54, 55 
 
 Resch (Jeremiah), 141, 143 
 
 Reverdino (Cesare), 63 
 
 Ribera (Giacomo), 74, 77 
 
 Ridinger (John Elias), 177 
 
 Riffaut (A.) 325 
 
 Rivalz (Antoine), 289 
 
 Robert (Hubert) 289 
 
 Robetta, 22 
 
 Rode (Christian Bernard), 178 
 
 Roger (Barthelemy), 302 
 
 Rosso, 23, 24, 229, 230, 232 
 
 Roullet (Jean Louis), 274 
 
 Rousseaux (Emile), 306 
 
 Rowlandson (Thomas), 204, 205 
 
 Rubens (Peter Paul), 82, 92, 115, 
 116, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 
 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 135, 
 136, 137 
 
 Ruggieri (Guido), 230, 232 
 
 Rupert (Prince), 189, 276, 319, 320 
 
 Rupp (James), 143 
 
 Ruysdael (Jacob), 106 
 
 Ryland (William Wynne), 192, 204 
 
 Sablon (Pierre), 227 
 
 Sadelers (The), 120, 241 
 
 Saenredam (John), 112 
 
 Saint Aubin (Augustine de), 295, 
 
 296 
 
 Saint Aubin (Gabriel de), 288, 289 
 Saint German, 143 
 Saint Igny (Jean de), 250 
 Saint Mesmin, 302 
 Salmon, (Adolphe), 306 
 Sarrabat (Isaac), 277 
 Savart (Pierre), 294 
 Schauflein (Hans), 142 
 Schmidt (George Frederick), 178, 
 
 179, 1 80, 293 
 Schongauer (Martin), 3, 84, 88, 
 
 145, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 
 
 158, 168 
 
ENGRAVERS' NAMES. 
 
 337 
 
 Schuppen (Peter van), 273 
 
 Schut (Cornelius), 135 
 
 Scotin (Girard), 286 
 
 Scultori (Adamo), 66, 67, 68 
 
 Scultori (Diana), 66, 67, 68 
 
 Scultori (Giovanni Baptiste), 66, 68 
 
 Sergent Marceau, 301 
 
 Sesto (Cesare da), 44 
 
 Siegen (Louis of), 321 
 
 Silvestre (Israel), 265 
 
 Simonet ( Jean-Bap tiste), 296 
 
 Sirani (Andrea), 54 
 
 Smith (John Raphael), 196, I 97 
 
 Solis (Virgilius), 145, 173, 174 
 
 Somer (Peter van), 263 
 
 Sompel (Peter van), 130 
 
 Soutman (Peter), 115, 116, 117, 130 
 
 Spierre (Fra^ois), 274 
 
 Spilsbury (Y.), 196 
 
 Staren (Dirck van), 90, 91 
 
 Stella (Claudine), 262, 263 
 
 Stella (Jacques), 262 
 
 Stock (Andrew), 130 
 
 Stoop (Theodore), 102 
 
 Strange (Robert), 190 
 
 Surugue (Louis), 285, 287 
 
 Suyderoef (Jonas), 115, 116 
 
 Swanevelt (Herman), 106 
 
 Taberith (Jan), 143 
 
 Tardieu (Pierre Alexander), 303 
 
 Tempesta (Antonio), 244 
 
 Thomas (John), 136 
 
 Thomassin (Philip), 52, 70, 229, 244 
 
 Thulden (Theodore van), 136 
 
 Tibaldi (Domenico), 50 
 
 Tiepolo (Domenico), 39 
 
 Tilliard (Jean Baptiste), 296 
 
 Tiry (Leonard), 230, 231 
 
 Tortebat (Franyois), 254 
 
 Tortorel, 217, 242 
 
 Tory (Geoffroy), 214, 217 
 
 Toschi (Paolo), 73 
 Trenta (Antonio da), 8 
 Trouvain (Antoine), 274 
 Turner (Ch.), 196, 199. 
 
 Uliet (Van), 99 
 
 Vaechtlein (Hans Ulrich), called Pil- 
 grim, 144 
 
 Vaillant (Wallerant), 276, 321 
 Valesio (Giovanni), 53 
 Vallet (Pierre), 226 
 Velde (Adrien van de), 102 
 Velde (Isaiah van de), no 
 Verard (Antoine), 208, 209 
 Verrochio (Andrea), 43 
 Vertue (George), 194 
 Vico (^Eneas), 64, 65 
 Vignon (Claude), 256 
 Villamene (Franz), 70 
 Vinci (Leonardo da), 41, 42, 43, 44, 
 
 45 
 Visscher (Cornelius), 116, 117, 118, 
 
 119 
 
 Vivares (Francis), 191, 192 
 Voet (Alexander), 131 
 Vorsterman (Lucas), 128, 129, 132, 
 
 135 
 
 Vostre (Simon), 209, 211 
 
 Ward (James), 196 
 
 Waterloo, 109 
 
 Watson (J. and Thomas), 196 
 
 Watteau (Antoine), 282, 285 
 
 Wattelet (Claude Henri), 289 
 
 Watts (F.), 196 
 
 Weirotter (Francis Edmund), 177 
 
 Wierix (The), 120 
 
 Wille (John George), 178, 179, 180, 
 
 181, 293, 299, 303 
 Withdoeck (Hans), 130 
 
338 
 
 ENGRA VERS NAMES. 
 
 Woieriot (Pierre), 224 
 Wolgemuth, 140, 158, 159 
 Woollett (William), 190, 191 
 Wouverman (Philip), 102 
 Wyngaerde (Francis Van den), 136 
 
 Zagel (Martin), 158 
 Zanetti (Antonio Maria), 9 
 Zeeman (surname of Rene Nooms), 
 
 no, in 
 Zwoll, 87 
 
 IOKDON : PHIKTED BY W CLOWES AND SDKS, STAMFOED STRBET 
 AND CHAIUNG CKOSS. 
 
NOW PUBLISHING, 
 
 TWO CHOICE SERIES OF BOOKS, 
 i. 
 
 THE BAYARD SERIES. 
 
 COMPRISING PLEASURE BOOKS .OF LITERATURE PRODUCED IN THE CHOICEST 
 STYLE, AS COMPANIONABLE VOLUMES AT HOME AND ABROAD. 
 
 Price 2S. 6d. each Vohime, complete in itself, printed at the Chiswick Press, 
 bound by BURN, flexible cloth extra, gilt leaves, with silk Headbands and 
 Registers. 
 
 THE STORY OF THE CHEVALIER BAYARD. By M. 
 
 DE BERVILLE. 
 
 DE JOINVILLE'S ST. LOUIS, KING OF FRANCE. 
 THE ESSAYS OF ABRAHAM COWLEY, including all his 
 
 Prose Works. 
 
 ABDALLAH ; OR, THE FOUR LEAVES. By EDOUARD 
 LABOULLAYE. 
 
 TABLE-TALK AND OPINIONS OF NAPOLEON BUONA- 
 PARTE. 
 
 VATHEK : AN ORIENTAL ROMANCE. By WILLIAM 
 BECKFORD. 
 
 THE KING AND THE COMMONS : a Selection of Cavalier 
 and Puritan Song. Edited by Prof. MORLEY. 
 
 WORDS OF WELLINGTON : Maxims and Opinions of the 
 Great Duke. 
 
 DR. JOHNSON'S RASSELAS, PRINCE OF ABYSSINIA. 
 
 With Notes. 
 HAZLITT'S ROUND TABLE. With Biographical Introduction. 
 
 THE RELIGIO MEDICI, HYDRIOTAPHIA, AND THE 
 LETTER TO A FRIEND. By Sir THOMAS BROWNE, Knt. 
 
 BALLAD POETRY OF THE AFFECTIONS. By ROBERT 
 
 BUCHANAN. 
 COLERIDGE'S CHRISTABEL, and other Imaginative Poems. 
 
 With Preface by ALGERNON C. SWINBURNE. 
 
 LORD CHESTERFIELD'S LETTERS, SENTENCES, AND 
 
 MAXIMS. With Introduction by the Editor, and Essay on Chesterfield 
 by M. DE ST. BEUVE, of the French Academy. 
 
 ESSAYS IN MOSAIC. By THOMAS BALLANTYNE. 
 
 OTHER VOLUMES IN ACTIVE PROGRESS. 
 
 A suitable Case containing 12 volumes, price 31$. 6d. ; or, the Case separate, 
 price 3-y. 6c/. 
 
THE BAYARD SERIES. 
 EXTRACTS FROM LITERARY NOTICES. 
 
 "The present series taking its name from the opening volume, which contained 
 a translation of the Knight without Fear and without Reproach will really, we 
 think, fill a void in the shelves of all except the most complete English libraries. 
 These little square-shaped volumes contain, in a very manageable and pretty 
 form, a great many things not very easy of access elsewhere, and some things 
 for the first time brought together." /W/ Mall Gazette. 
 
 " We have here two more volumes of the series appropriately called the 
 ' Bayard,' as they certainly are ' sans reproche.' Of convenient size, with clear 
 typography and tasteful binding, we know no other little volumes which make 
 such good gift-books for persons of mature age." Examiner. 
 
 "St. Louis and his companions, as described by Joinville, not only in their 
 glistening armour, but in their every-day attire, are brought nearer to us, become 
 intelligible to us, and teach us lessons of humanity which we can learn from 
 men only, and not from saints and heroes. Here lies the real value of real 
 history. It widens our minds and our hearts, and gives us that true knowledge 
 of the world and of human nature in all its phases which but few can gain in the 
 short span of their own life, and in the narrow sphere of their friends and enemies. 
 We can hardly imagine a better book for boys to read or for men to ponder over." 
 Times. 
 
 " Every one of the works included in this series is well worth possessing, and 
 the whole will make an admirable foundation for the library of a studious 
 youth of polished and refined tastes." Illustrated Times. 
 
 II. 
 
 THE GENTLE LIFE SERIES. 
 
 Printed in Elzevir, on Toned Paper, handsomely bound, forming suitable 
 
 Volumes for Presents. 
 
 Price 6s. each ; or, in calf extra, price IDJ. (>d. 
 I. 
 
 THE GENTLE LIFE. Essays in aid of the Formation 
 of Character of Gentlemen and Gentlewomen. Ninth Edition. 
 
 " His notion of a gentleman is of the noblest and truest order. The 
 volume is a capital specimen of what may be done by honest reason, high 
 feeling, and cultivated intellect. A little compendium of cheerful philo- 
 sophy." Daily News. 
 
 "Deserves to be printed in letters of gold, and circulated in every 
 house." Chambers' Journal. 
 
 II. 
 
 ABOUT IN THE WORLD. Essays by the Author 
 of " The Gentle Life." 
 
 " It is not easy to open it at any page without finding some happy idea." 
 Morning Post. 
 
 "Another characteristic merit of these essays is, that they make it their 
 business, gently but firmly, to apply the qualifications and the corrections, 
 which all philanthropic theories, all general rules or maxims, or principles, 
 stand in need of before you can make them work." Literary Churchman. 
 
THE GENTLE LIFE SERIES continued. 
 
 in. 
 
 LIKE UNTO CHRIST. A new translation of the 
 " De Imitatione Christi," usually ascribed to Thomas a Kempis. 
 With a Vignette from an Original Drawing by Sir Thomas 
 Lawrence. Second Edition. 
 
 " Evinces independent scholarship, a profound feeling for the original, 
 and a minute attention to delicate shades of expression, which may well 
 make it acceptable even to those who can enjoy the work without a trans- 
 lator's aid." Nonconformist. 
 
 "Could not be presented in a more exquisite form, fora more sightly 
 volume was never seen." Illustrated London News. 
 
 IV. 
 
 FAMILIAR WORDS. An Index Verborum, or Quo- 
 tation Handbook. Affording an immediate Reference to 
 Phrases and Sentences that have become embedded in the 
 English language. Second and enlarged Edition. 
 
 " Should be on every library table, by the side of ' Rogers Thesaurus.' " 
 Daily News. 
 
 "The most extensive dictionary of quotation we have met with." 
 Notes and Queries. 
 
 " Will add to the author's credit with all honest workers." Examiner. 
 
 V. 
 
 ESSAYS BY MONTAIGNE. Edited, Compared, Re- 
 vised, and Annotated by the Author of " The Gentle Life." 
 With Vignette Portrait. Second Edition. 
 
 "We should be glad if any words of ours could help to bespeak a large 
 circulation for this handsome, attractive book ; and who can refuse his 
 homage to the good-humoured industry of the editor?" Illustrated Times. 
 
 VI. 
 
 THE COUNTESS OF PEMBROKE'S ARCADIA. 
 
 Written by Sir PHILIP SIDNEY. Edited, with Notes, by the 
 Author of "The Gentle Life." Dedicated, by permission, to 
 the Earl of Derby, js. 6d. 
 
 "All the best things in the Arcadia are retained intact in Mr. Friswell's 
 edition, and even brought into greater prominence than in the original, by 
 the curtailment of some of its inferior portions, and the omission of most 
 of its eclogues and other metrical digressions." Examiner. 
 
 VII. 
 
 THE GENTLE LIFE. Second Series. Third Edition. 
 
 " There is not a single thought in the volume that does not contribute in 
 some measure to the formation of a true gentleman." Daily News. 
 " This charming collection of essays." London Review. 
 
VIII. 
 
 VARIA : Readings from Rare Books. Reprinted, by 
 permission, from the Saturday Review, Spectator, &c. 
 
 "The books discussed in this volume are no less valuable than they are 
 rare, but life is not long enough to allow a reader to wade through such 
 thick folios, and therefore the compiler is entitled to the gratitude of the 
 public for having sifted their contents, and thereby rendered their treasures 
 available to the general reader." Observer, 
 IX. 
 
 A CONCORDANCE OR VERBAL INDEX to the 
 
 whole of Milton's Poetical Works. Comprising upwards of 
 20,000 References. By CHARLES D. CLEVELAND, LL.D. 
 With Vignette Portrait of Milton. 
 
 * # * Affords an immediate reference to any passage in any 
 Edition of Milton's Poems. 
 
 "An invaluable Index, which the publishers have done a public service 
 in reprinting." Notes and Queries. 
 
 ." By the admirers of Milton the book will be highly appreciated, but its 
 chief value will, if we mistake not, be found in the fact that it is a compact 
 word-book of the English language." Record. 
 
 X. 
 
 THE SILENT HOUR : Essays, Original and Selected. 
 By the Author of " The Gentle Life." Second Edition. 
 
 " Out of twenty Essays five are from the Editor's pen, and he has 
 selected the rest from the writings of Barrow, Baxter, Sherlock, Massillon, 
 
 Latimer, Sandys, Jeremy Taylor, Ruskin, and Izaak Walton 
 
 The volume is avowedly meant ' for Sunday reading,' and those who have 
 not access to the originals of great authors may do worse on Sunday or 
 any other afternoon, than fall back upon the ' Silent Hour' and the golden 
 words of Jeremy Taylor and Massillon. All who possess the ' Gentle 
 Life ' should own this volume." Standard. 
 XI. 
 
 ESSAYS ON ENGLISH WRITERS, for the Self- 
 
 improvement of Students in English Literature. 
 
 " The author has a distinct purpose and a proper and noble ambition to 
 win the young to the pure and noble study of our glorious English literature. 
 The book is too good intrinsically not to command a wide and increasing 
 circulation, and its style is so pleasant and lively that it will find many 
 readers among the educated classes, as well as among self-helpers. To all 
 (both men and women) who have neglected to read and study their native 
 literature we would certainly suggest the volume before us as a fitting 
 introduction." Examiner. 
 
 XII. 
 
 OTHER PEOPLE'S WINDOWS. By J. HAIN FRIS- 
 
 WELL. Second Edition. 
 
 " The chapters are so lively in themselves, so mingled with shrewd views 
 of human nature, so full of illustrative anecdotes, that the reader cannot 
 fail to be amused. Written with remarkable power and effect. ' Other 
 People's Windows ' is distinguished by original and keen observation of 
 life, as well as by lively and versatile power of narration." Morning Post. 
 
 LONDON: SAMPSON LOW, SON, AND MARSTON, 
 
 CROWN BUILDINGS, 188, FLEET STREET, 
 
ten too?