THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES BY TEE SAME AUTHOR. A HISTORY OF SOCIALISM. SeconO EDftion, "RevteeD an& Bnlargefc. Crown 8 do., cloth, price 7s. 6d. SOME PRESS OPINIONS. Athenaeum. "So fair, so learned, and so well written, that we have nothing but praise for its author." Daily News. "Like Mr. Robertson Smith in another field, Mr. Kirkup led the grave readers of the ' Encyclopaedia ' into regions where they never expected to find themselves, and he helped to give Socialism in England that defiuite place among economic systems which it holds to-day." British "Weekly. ' ' Every page bears traces of conscientious and scholarly labour, and of wide reading both in English and foreign literature. The work is well worthy to remain the standard text-book on Socialism." Standard. " This bold and luminous outline displays an uncommon grasp of the underlying principles of a movement which is rapidly beginning to play a great part in modern society." Freeman's Journal. " This book is practically indispensable to anyone who wishes to acquire an adequate knowledge of the leading phases of historic Socialism." Leeds Mercury. " The tone in all the argumentative passages of this able and opportune volume is at once sympathetic, independent and fearless." Saturday Review. ' ' Mr. Kirkup has done more than any writer to expound the history and philosophy of the Socialistic movement. ... On all historical and philosophical points connected with his subject the book is notably learned and interesting." Bookman. ' ' Mr. Kirkup's book was recognised at its first appearance as the standard history of Socialism, and careful study has only revealed new excellencies and confirmed our judgment." Pall Mall Gazette. ' ' Those who wish to see the chaff of a movemeut winnowed for them from the grain cannot do better than read the book." Scotsman. " The new matter shows the same thorough mastery of the subject and the same lucidity of exposition as the earlier portions of the book. In its newer form the book thoroughly maintains the reputation it has made for itself as one of the best — if not the best — summaries of the history of Socialism in English." Glasgow Herald. "Writing recently in the New York Outlook, Dr. Washington Gladden remarked upon Mr. Kirkup's insight into the economic tendencies of the time, as shown in his ' Inquiry into Socialism,' published in 1887 : ' Whether or not Mr. Kirkup is alive to-day I do not know ; if he is, the rapidity with which the movement so clearly outlined by him has been advancing to its issue must be observed by him with curious interest.' Happily Mr. Kirkup is still with us, free to watch the fulfilment of his own prophecies and to utter fresh oracles. His latest estimate of social development comes to us with the authority of one whose earlier analysis has been abundantly confirmed. . . . Altogether, the book is at once a concise, luminous and philosophical statement of the underlying principles of the Socialist movement." Manchester Guardian. " Every intelligent student of Socialism will gladly welcome this new edition of Mr. Kirkup's excellent and interesting work, since it is unquestionably the best study of Socialism in the English language, and since it is written from an English standpoint. . . . Mr. Kirkup's enlightened treatment of the whole vast subject is of the utmost value." PUBLISHED BY ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE, LONDON. PROGRESS AND THE FISCAL PROBLEM BY THOMAS KIRKUP AUTHOR OF "A HISTORY OF SOCIALISM," "SOOTH AFRICA, OLD AND NEW," ETC. LONDON ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1905 -. 7 ' ' o 25 NOV.tl» PREFACE The writer of another book on the Fiscal Problem may well be asked why he should add to a pile which is already overgrown. To such an inquiry one might reasonably reply that most of the books already published on the subject bear obvious marks of haste and of bias ; but I would rather give as my main reason for offering such a book to the public my belief that some important points have hitherto been overlooked, and many have not received due attention. These I have tried to bring out, while I have laid special stress on wider aspects of progress which seem to me vitally, if not inseparably, connected with the Fiscal Problem. As the title of my book indicates, it is concerned not only with the Fiscal Problem, but with allied questions of progress. iii 4-' ,8 iv PREFACE I have not treated the subject merely as a technical question of economics, nor have I written in any party interest. As it is more than probable that certain limitations of the insular mind may have a serious influence on the question, I may add that I had the advantage of studying at Gottingen, Berlin, and Tubingen, at Geneva and Paris, and have long been familiar with the best German and French works on history and economics. For the encouragement of prospective readers, I have as far as possible confined statistics to a special chapter, which they can leave alone if they see fit. In conclusion, I wish to express special obligations on several points connected with commercial geography to the standard work, ' Handbook of Commercial Geography ' (Long- mans and Co.), of my friend Mr. G. G. Chisholm, who has also kindly revised the proofs. Such revision should be the more valuable because he differs from me entirely on the main question. T. KIRK UP. CONTENTS CHAPTER I. PAGE INTRODUCTION - - - - - 1 CHAPTEE II. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF GREAT BRITAIN - 16 CHAPTER III. INDUSTRIAL POSITION OF GERMANY - - 32 CHAPTER IV. INDUSTRIAL POSITION OF AMERICA - - 42 CHAPTER V. SUCCESS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION - - 50 CHAPTER VI. FREEDOM AND PROGRESS- - - - 58 CHAPTER VII. FREE TRADE IN THE LIGHT OF HISTORY- - 89 V vi CONTENTS CHAPTER VIII. PAGE A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK - - - - 99 CHAPTER IX. DUMPING- ... - 112 CHAPTER X. SIFTED STATISTICS - - - - 137 CHAPTER XL TARIFF REFORM AND INDUSTRIAL PROGRESS - 162 CHAPTER XII. THE STATE AND PROGRESS - - - 183 PROGRESS AND THE FISCAL PROBLEM CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The unexpected has happened again. If any- one at the beginning of 1903 had ventured to predict that the all-absorbing topic of the country would soon be a proposal to reverse, or at least seriously to modify, the system of Free Trade which we so long have followed, he would have been refused a hearing. Yet proposals to that effect of the most far- reaching character have been made, and by a statesman of the highest eminence. Everyone has been considering and discussing them, and we may be assured that the subject is not 1 2 THE FISCAL PROBLEM one of passing interest, but is likely to be a supreme concern for a long time to come. In the agitation which preceded the repeal ot the Corn Laws we may see a notable means of economic and political education. It was, indeed, the first attempt in English history to instruct the mass of the people in economic problems. The present discussion will be a far more effectual training in national and Imperial business. The question put before the country by Cobden sixty years ago was a simple one compared with those we now have to face. To use the common phrase, Britain was then the workshop of the world. In industry, commerce, and finance she had no rivals. Our colonies were wide in area, but in popula- tion were insignificant. We had only our- selves to think of, and our industrial and commercial position was unchallenged. The proposal of Cobden was merely to remove old restrictions and let things take a free course — for the Government a very easy proceeding. At present we need not stop to contrast this simple problem with the proposals now made by Mr, Chamberlain. We can all see how NTRODUCTION 3 difficult and complicated they are, and that if adopted they place upon the Government and country responsibilities which are very serious, and likely to be permanent. If we must take up the burden, we shall have to bear it with courage and resolution, as becomes an Imperial race. But there can be no doubt that the complexity of our economic position is one of the strongest arguments against any departure from our present system. Wise men will pause to count the cost before venturing upon it. For example, let us take the cotton trade of this country. It exists on a very small margin of profit, and it has most delicate and complicated relations with every nation in the world. How could Government presume to do anything that would hamper such a trade ? May we not rather regard it as the first duty of rulers to leave it alone, to be guided by the experienced men who devote their whole time to it ? It will only be the pressure of hard facts or the prospect of very solid advantages that will move the country to adopt a new course. My own opinion is that it may be 1—2 4 THE FISCAL PROBLEM several years before we again have anything like a settled fiscal policy. As a means of education in the widest sense the fiscal problem may certainly be expected to do lasting good. We have all been incited to study the elements of national well-being in a way we never did before. The business of the country in its various departments — coal - mining, iron, cotton, woollens, and shipping — has been brought home to us with a vividness and in a detail which to most of us have been as informing- as they have been surprising. We have learned, too, to take a wider and more familiar interest in the questions of Empire and of the future of the English-speaking race, which we hope will bear good fruit. If we come to realize how necessary education in the ordinary sense is now for the healthy progress of industry, the agitation caused by Mr. Chamberlain will not have been in vain. I need not say that the fiscal problem, as now put, should be above party and above class. It is a national and Imperial question of the first magnitude. One may, therefore, INTRODUCTION 5 be permitted to express the deepest regret that from the beginning the main points of the question have been obscured by the dust of party controversy. In view of its supreme importance for the nation and the Empire, might we not have expected a wiser abstin- ence from the ordinary party warfare ? At the same time it is a problem which is concerned with the daily life of every man in the country. It has to do with the daily bread of himself and family, and with the employment by which he earns the money to buy it. While it is a national question, therefore, it is a personal matter also of a most serious kind. In this respect the fiscal question is unequalled as a means of economic and political education. We may go further, and say that every man is not only permitted, he is in duty bound, to think of the well-being of the special industry to which he belongs. But a comprehensive and rational discussion of the question demands that we have a due regard to the staple industries on which the well- being of the country chiefly depends. After 6 THE FISCAL PROBLEM a period of unexampled prosperity, a change came over these great industries about the year 1875. Agriculture was the first to show symptoms that a new time had come. The present writer remembers very well how in the autumn of 1876 the pressure of American competition portended a hard future for the British farmer. The opening up in America of immense areas of land of surpass- ing fertility, formerly untouched by the plough, and the great development of trans- port thence to our shores, brought into our market enormous supplies of grain, which permanently lowered prices. Since that time things have not gone well for the farmer. But we may be justified in believing that the tide will now flow the other way. The large increase of population in America is so widening the home market there that it will be less able to send us cheap corn. The virgin soil will in time lose its wonderful fertility. So far recent symptoms may be regarded as encouraging. On the other hand, America has also enormous supplies of coal, iron, and INTRODUCTION 7 copper, which enable her to enter into com- petition with European industries. She can produce coal far more cheaply than we can. Thus she is becoming a formidable competitor, not only in agriculture, but in industry generally. For general industry she has many special advantages not unlike those she has had for agriculture. And now the proposals of Mr. Chamberlain, whatever the precise consequences they may have in the near future, will in all probability make a permanent change in the attitude of people and Government to our industries. In these circumstances we may reasonably expect more favourable consideration for the industry which is in every way the most important — namely, agriculture. Many are beginning to see that it is not a wise policy that the national character and physique should be allowed to suffer permanent deterioration through the decline of rural interests, pursuits, and indus- tries. " Back to the land !" may need to be the social and political watchward of the coming generation. We may require to reconsider most thoroughly what life and industry on 8 THE FISCAL PROBLEM the land mean for national well-being in its widest and deepest sense. The further dis- cussion of the fiscal problem may show that agriculture and the other industries of the country, instead of being opposed, must stand or fall together. It will do no harm to our statesmen if they are obliged in the future to spend less time in the game of parties, and more time in under- standing and promoting industry. In any case we voters are the Csesar to whom they are now appealing. On us falls the hard task, first of enlightening ourselves, and then of deciding what they must do in our interests. Since the fiscal question was raised in the summer of 1903 the country has been over- whelmed with statistics. Side issues, with irrelevant matter of every kind, have been introduced into the discussion. It would be well, therefore, to fix our attention at the out- set on the central and vital points of the controversy. When we decided on a Free Trade policy about sixty years ago our supremacy in industry INTRODUCTION 9 and commerce was beyond challenge. During the last generation formidable rivals have arisen in Germany and America. The people of both those countries belong mainly to the same shrewd, energetic, and enterprising races as ourselves. Both countries are in the temperate zone, and both, especially America, have large natural resources. For various reasons they were late in getting started in their industrial development, but once started they have rapidly come to the front. They excel in all, or nearly all, the staple branches in which we have won our success. What is perhaps even more important, they have carried to a further stage certain forms of industrial organization, variously called trusts, syndicates, or combines, which, in the meantime at least, give them, or seem to give them, great advantages in competition with this country. I say they have carried these forms of organization to a further stage, because we have these forms of organization in this country too, but in a less developed shape. It may be a debatable point whether trusts 10 THE FISCAL PROBLEM could be thoroughly developed in a Free Trade country like ours, nor need we debate it at present. A point on which all will agree is that they have come to the fullest development in two protected countries, America and Germany, and that their growth is certainly favoured by Protection. But the vital matter with regard to the fiscal problem which we are now discussing is as follows : Let us take Germany, with its population of nearly 60,000,000. In Germany the great syndicates control production in the staple industries, and they control this home market of 60,000,000. With regard to wages, they have, of course, to reckon with the work- men, but as the syndicated firms are practically the sole employers, the strength of their position is obvious. As regards the prices in the market, they have to reckon with the consumers ; but as the syndicates command the only sources of supply, I need not point out that they are quite able to charge very good and profitable prices. Thus the German trusts have a most commanding position at home, in a market, be it remembered, of INTRODUCTION 1 1 60,000,000. Germany has other advantages of a special kind, on which I shall not dwell at present. Our home market of 42,000,000 is as open to Germany as it is to us, as is also the entire British Empire, except in so far as our self- governing colonies have given us a preference. Our home market and the Imperial market are in a similiar way open to America, which has a protected home market of 80,000,000. With such a large, secure, and very profit- able home market, the German manufacturers feel encouraged to lay down an enormous plant of the most efficient kind, and to produce goods in vast quantities. As they receive very good prices at home, they can afford to sell at very low prices abroad. The trusts, moreover, have influence enough with the Government to obtain favourable rates for transport on the railways. In this way, naturally enough, the process so well known as "dumping" takes place in this country. It is alleged that they can sell at prices against which our manufacturers cannot compete. 12 THE FISCAL PROBLEM It is obvious that some of our trades benefit by this dumping. Our makers of confectionery have been glad to have very cheap sugar. Our shipbuilders are also very glad to have very cheap steel plates. But the dumping may become a general process. Let us suppose that our iron and steel industries should go the same way as our agriculture and our sugar trade, and suppose, further, that the cotton and woollen manufactures followed our iron and steel industries on the down grade. Let us avoid exaggeration of every kind. I do not say that our agriculture or our sugar trade has gone entirely to ruin ; but no one will deny that they have been on the down grade for a long time. Now, if our staple industries — cotton, iron, and woollens — decline to the same degree, what will become of the economic position of England, and how will employment be found for the millions of workmen in Lancashire, Yorkshire, and on the Tyne and Wear ? I have dealt specially with German competition because it appears at present to be most pronounced and active. But America has natural advantages which INTRODUCTION 13 may in time make it a far more formidable rival than Germany. Germany and America are our most serious competitors. Belgium is a very small country, "with limited possibilities. France competes with us in woollens and silks. She sends us butter from her fine pastures in Normandy and Brittany, and also wine, which we cannot produce. But her stores of coal and iron are not large enough to make her a formidable rival in general industry. With regard to Germany and America the most serious part of the problem is this : During the last twenty years, in the trusts and their international action, forces have come into existence which may affect the industrial and commercial condition of the world in a manner and to a degree which defy human forecast. These forces have come into existence ; but they have not yet come — they are only now coming — into full operation in the national and international spheres. It is this fact, that they are in existence, but have not yet come into anything like full action, that in my opinion constitutes the difficulty with 14 THE FISCAL PROBLEM regard to the present fiscal problem. And we must not forget that even after great forces have come into operation many years may elapse before their full effect is felt or can be calculated. No sifting of statistics, valuable as that may be, will enable us clearly to understand our position. But they can render one very important service : they can reveal tendencies. Through them we can, if we examine them carefully and wisely, discover symptoms which will enable us to see how things are moving, or beginning to move. It is the duty of the wise statesman to study such symptoms, and to take timely action in accordance with them. If we must take action to safeguard our staple industries, it should be clear that agriculture, the greatest of our industries, must receive favourable consideration. Such measures could be carried only by a combina- tion of the manufacturing and agricultural interests. Favourable consideration for agri- culture means reasonable duties on foreign corn and meat, in which is involved pre- ferential treatment of the colonies. Thus the INTRODUCTION 1 5 protection of our staple industries and of agriculture and preferential treatment of the colonies form an organic whole. But the pivot of the entire question is this : Shall we need to safeguard the staple industries in cotton, wool, iron, etc., on which our economic and national well-being depends ? Such is the problem which we must face under the conditions that now prevail, or tend to prevail. We have to consider the com- peting capacity of Germany and America as compared with our own. We must, therefore, contrast the whole industrial position of these countries with our own, remembering that the present industrial position of each is the result of circumstances which are partly natural and partly historical. CHAPTER II INDUSTEIAL DEVELOPMENT OF GREAT BRITAIN In the present controversy it is frequently stated that our industrial prosperity has been due to Free Trade. Speakers and writers on the other side suggest, if they do not assert, that the industrial prosperity of our rivals is owing to Protection. I shall try briefly to explain the real conditions on which our industrial supremacy was based. For many centuries we have not seen an invading army in England, and our national development in all its departments has gone on untrammelled by foreign interference. From early times we have been strong at sea : we have long been supreme on that element ; our geographical position has been most favourable. It was therefore in our power to 16 GREAT BRITAIN 17 establish colonies and trading-stations, and to find access to all the available markets o£ the world. At home Great Britain continued to be mainly an agricultural country till far on into the eighteenth century. But early in that century a series of mechanical inventions and improvements began, which in time made a complete change. Mechanical spinning was the first of the great industrial innovations to be gradually developed. Then followed the effective steam - engine, the first working engine being turned out of the Soho Works of Boulton and Watt at Birmingham in 1776. The power-loom, invented about 1785, did not come into practical use till 1801. Steam navigation was made a success in the early years of the nineteenth century. The steam locomotive and the railway train took working shape with the opening of the Stockton and Darlington Railway in 1825. The electric telegraph dates from 1837, and crossed the Straits of Dover in 1850, only about fifty years ago. These wonderful changes, and others which 2 1 8 THE FISCAL PROBLEM we need not mention, constituted an indus- trial revolution, in which, to use the common phrase, we were first, and the other nations nowhere. In more precise language, we took the lead in a great industrial change, and kept it for more than a hundred years. The details of the revolution are more or less familiar to everyone, and we have here given this brief summary of it merely because its real bearing on our economic position has been so much overlooked in the fiscal controversy. That is to say, we held for a long period a unique position, which we have now lost — a fact of incalculable impor- tance, which we should constantly bear in mind. Our industrial supremacy was established before we adopted Free Trade in 1846. It was won whilst our fiscal system was Protec- tive. There can be no reasonable doubt that in their early stages our industries owed much to the protecting hand of the State. At all times the development of political and of industrial power is closely connected, and it was specially so in former days, when wars were so frequent. For ourselves a strong GREAT BRITAIN 19 fleet was needed, not only for national security, but for commercial and colonial expansion. This was recognised in the Navigation Laws, of which Adam Smith, the expounder of Free Trade, says that they were "as wise as if they had all been dictated by the most deliberate wisdom. National animosity at that particular time aimed at the very same object which the most deliberate wisdom would have recom- mended : the diminution of the naval power of Holland, the only naval power which could endanger the security of England." But it would be a mistake to overestimate the influence of the Protective measures of past times. We took the lead in the industrial revolution, and secured the first-fruits of it, because we were beyond all others at that time a free, progressive, and enterprising people. And we lived under favourable conditions. We had coalfields and iron-ores in close proximity to each other, and a splendid geographical position. It would likewise be a mistake to over- estimate the influence of Free Trade in the period after 1846. As we all know, the 2—2 20 THE FISCAL PROBLEM repeal of the Corn Laws was accomplished by the new industrial class, led by Richard Cobden. For some years before repeal the country suffered the direst misery, but it was only in part owing to the Corn Laws. A long period passed away before the country recovered from the exhaustion caused by the Xapoleonic wars, and from the disturbances in industry and the labour market consequent on the cessation of those wars. There had been a succession of bad seasons from 1839 to 1841. The hand-loom weavers, whose numbers had a few years before been estimated at 250,000, with 800,000 people dependent on them, were dying out by slow starvation, one of the most painful tragedies in the history of industry, and, indeed, in the history of the world. A period of booming prosperity, accompanied with the usual overspeculation and inflation, which had culminated about 1837, had been followed by the usual stagnation and depression in the subsequent years. Moreover, the old Poor Law, which supplemented very low wages by doles out of the rates, had been repealed in GREAT BRITAIN 21 1834, a measure which for a time greatly aggravated the sufferings of the poor. Thus a conjunction of causes produced widespread and long-continued misery. In 1842, out of a population of 16,000,000 in England and Wales, 1,429,000 were on the pauper roll. " In Rochdale five-sixths of the population had scarcely a blanket among them ; eighty-five families had no blanket, and forty-six families had chaff beds, with no covering at all. In Paisley 15,000 persons were in a state of starvation, with little or no clothing, and no bedding on which to lie."* The wretched and insanitary overcrowding was not confined to the towns. " In one parish in Dorsetshire thirty-six persons dwelt on an average in each house, "f These are samples of the awful misery that then pre- vailed in town and country. It will be seen, then, that the Corn Laws were only one important item in a com- plex group of causes which produced the * Spencer Walpole's "History of England," vol. iv., p. 25. t Ibid., p. 25. 22 THE FISCAL PROBLEM misery of the period of which we have been speaking. No one now, I presume, would defend the Corn Laws as they then existed. They were as short-sighted as they were selfish and oppressive, and even to-day the agricultural interest suffers from the associa- tion which was then established in the minds of the people between dear bread and Pro- tection. Trade was reviving, and the agitation for repeal had become much less active, when the very wet autumn of 1845, and, above all, the prospect of famine in Ireland owing to the failure of the potato crop, completed the over- throw of a system which was already under- mined in the minds of our leading statesmen. The repeal of the Corn Laws, it should be remembered, was only the most striking event in a long movement for freer trade which began in 1822, and reached its con- summation in 1860. In truth, our trade was now in such a powerful position that it did not need Protec- tion. We were in all, or nearly all, depart- ments an easy first, and a match for the GREAT BRITAIN 23 world. Agriculture, too, after the wonderful improvements made in it during* the eighteenth century, had no real need of Protection. The landed interests had no right to claim or to expect a continuance of the abnormal prices obtained during the wars against the French. The increase of population and of wealth caused by the enormous development of our trade afforded it a sufficiently wide and secure and profitable market for grain and meat, wool and forage. The adoption of Free Trade was followed by a period of marvellous expansion — the opening up of the goldfields of California and Australia about 1850 ; the vast development of railway construction in every civilized country, and the growth of shipping, especially steam shipping ; the initiating of water and gas works in towns, and many other similar movements. In all these we took the lead, while the progress of our future rivals was hindered by war. But with regard to them all, the reasonable point of view is that Free Trade was merely an important condition of our industrial expansion. The real and 24 THE FISCAL PROBLEM substantial causes of our prosperity were to be found in the skill and energy of the British people, working under most favour- able circumstances, natural and historical. This prosperity culminated, relatively to other countries, about the year 1872. With regard to the industrial development of Great Britian some general reflections occur to us as requiring special attention. In fiscal matters, where regulation was unneces- sary, we pursued a policy of restriction, whilst in relation to labour in factories and mines, where regulation was our imperative duty, we permitted a wild, immoral, and baneful freedom. The physique, the intelligence, and the morale of our working population have not yet recovered from this twofold error. In fact, the system of restraints which culminated in the Corn Laws and the freedom which held sway in our factories and mines were national crimes, from the effects of which our people will suffer for many generations to come. It was just as well that in the triumphant stage of our industrial and commercial development foreign nations did not adopt GREAT BRITAIN 25 Free Trade. Their adoption of Free Trade would have given a great stimulus to our trade, which would have meant a further large increase of a population demoralized by the evils of our factory system and by our policy of laissez /aire, if such a course of selfish indifference and neglect can be dignified with the name of a policy. The circumstances under which such a class came into existence are the greatest blot in English history, and its continued existence and increase are the most serious difficulty which the country has now to face. The further increase of the class which would have been caused by the general adoption of Free Trade about the middle of the century would have been nothing short of a calamity. We need not point out that such a rapid development of trade would also have hastened the exhaus- tion of our coal-fields. In the generation which followed our adoption of Free Trade we sent our new machinery to foreign nations. We also sent them skilled men, who taught them our methods. Our policy of Free Trade was 26 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM thus a real boon to the world, which came into possession of the methods and appliances of the new industry at an earlier date than would have been possible if we had followed a narrower and more selfish policy. We can hardly claim the praise of philanthropy in so doing, as we believed we were simply follow- ing the course and obeying the principles which were best for our own interests. We can, however, reasonably claim that in this very important matter our policy of Free Trade promoted the progress of the world to a very remarkable degree. We are j ustified in maintaining that the more rapid progress was due to the fact that we took an enlightened view of our interests. The net result of these reflections seems to be that we cannot very well form a correct estimate of the value of Free Trade by considering it merely in the abstract. We must try to view it in the light of many circumstances and conditions, physical and social, rational and moral. We must, above all, apply to it the moral test. If we apply this test without prejudice, restraint and GREAT BRITAIN 27 restriction may prove to be not only good, but imperatively necessary, and freedom, instead of being a panacea, may simply be an abuse and a crime. With special regard to the period after 1846, the course of events appeared to afford brilliant justification for the new policy of Free Trade. It was a period in which the twin sisters, Freedom and Opportunity, moved together step by step, scattering blessings of every kind from the capacious horn of plenty. Such a period of commercial and industrial expansion had never before occurred on such a scale in the history of the world. Such a plenitude of opportunities as was then given to England may possibly never again occur to any single nation of the world. We have already briefly referred to some of the features of this industrial expansion ; it will be well now to speak of them more particularly. In 1848 the gold-mines of California were discovered ; in 1851 the gold- mines of New South Wales and Victoria were first opened up. The thirst for gold thus awakened drew adventurers from all the old 28 THE FISCAL PROBLEM seats of civilization, but especially from the British Isles. In America there was a period of unexampled expansion after 1846, when the vast plains of the West and of the North- West, and particularly the valley of the Red River of the North, with a soil of surpassing fertility and suitability for wheat-growing attracted a steadier class of settlers. In Australia the wide pasture-lands were more extensively occupied than they had hitherto been, and such occupation was now supplemented by the spread of arable farming. But the grandest opportunities were found in connection with the industrial revolution, which, after being till this time centred in Great Britain, began to embrace every country of the world. In this, as we have said, we had for a time at least the immense advantage of being pioneers and teachers. Beyond the British Isles we built railways and con- structed telegraph-lines. Gas-works, water- works, and the new eystem of drainage in cities were in many lands established by British enterprise and with British capital. The machinery for the new industry, with GREAT BRITAIN 29 skilled managers, and workmen to set them jxoing', were at the same time sent abroad. Richly-laden merchant fleets, in which steam more and more served as the motive power, brought to our ports in growing abundance the products of every clime. All this, be it remembered, was an addition and a stimulus to trade at home, which went forward at an unprecedented pace. The expansion abroad meant a continually increasing demand for British goods. Lanca- shire, Yorkshire and the Midlands, the Tyne and the Clyde, prospered exceedingly. At home and abroad men grew rich. It was said of the private soldiers who served in the armies of the first Napoleon that every one carried a marshal's baton in his knapsack. In the armies of the industrial revolution, whether serving at home or abroad, every enterprising worker carried in his bag the means of acquiring a modest fortune, if he did not dream of being a millionaire. It was indeed a time of triumphant individualism, and may well be reckoned a new era in history. Thus fortunate was Free Trade, and, to a 30 THE FISCAL PROBLEM large degree, deserved ly so, though without such ample opportunity its fruits would have been much less marvellous. In other respects it was equally happy. As its expounder it had Adam Smith, most eminent in the combination of philosophical and historical knowledge and insight, humanity, moderation, and breadth of mind. Its foremost advocate in 1846 was Richard Cobden, a self-trained thinker of rare integrity and sagacity, lucidity and persuasiveness. In John Bright it had a champion of fervid eloquence and singular nobility of character. Sir Robert Peel, who carried the abolition of the Corn Laws, was in some important respects the best English statesman of the nineteenth century. During the period after 1846 J. S. Mill, an enthusiast in the cause of humanity and an enlightened and progressive thinker, was the accepted teacher of economics in Great Britain. And the movement was specially happy in W. E. Gladstone, who brought to the service of the State a genius, energy, and passionate devotion which have seldom been equalled in the history of any country. GREAT BRITAIN 31 We may be assured that a cause which attracted and was promoted by so many men of the highest worth and capacity had in it elements of enduring value. If it be the duty of each successive generation, not to undo the work of the generation preceding, but to continue and extend it so far as it can stand the test of reason and experience, then it behoves us to hold fast and to incorporate into our thought and action all that is valuable in freedom of trade. How to con- tinue this free development and to reconcile it with other great causes and ideals, human and national, is one of the supreme problems of the twentieth century. eHw CHAPTER III INDUSTRIAL POSITION OF GERMANY In the fiscal controversy many mistakes are being made, I believe, owing to a want of recognition of important facts in the industrial history and position of Germany. Compared with Great Britain, and even with France, Germany was very late in its industrial development. For the reasons of this we must go as far back, at least, as the seventeenth century. In the early half of that century the political and religious divisions of Germany resulted in the Thirty Years' War, which reduced the country to a desolation. Before the war Germany had many cities with promising industries and a progressive life. All was changed by the ruffianly, devastating armies which 32 GERMANY 33 repeatedly traversed the country from end to end. Some estimate that the population was diminished to one-third of what it formerly had been. Whole regions were laid waste again and again. Towns were sacked and depopulated. Germany did not recover from the economic effects of the Thirty Years' War till the middle of the nineteenth century. The moral and political effects of the war were incalculably serious. The German Princes ruled as independent Sovereigns, and were brutal and oppressive to a degree which we happily cannot realize. Peasantry and town workers sank into an almost hopeless poverty and degradation, which lasted for many generations. As the opportunities for colonial expansion enjoyed by other European Powers were then lost to her, Germany thus suffered detriment which cannot possibly be retrieved by any exertions that she can now or henceforward make. The divisions of Germany exposed her to continual interfer- ence and to repeated invasion from France. In the course of the eighteenth century the country began to recover, only to be crushed 3 34 THE FISCAL PROBLEM again under the heel of the first Napoleon. During the nineteenth century Germany pain- fully gathered up the broken threads of her historical development, this time successfully, and the present empire was established in 1871. Thus, while England has had a free and progressive development for centuries, the industrial and political progress of Germany really dates from a period which is well within the memory of persons who can hardly be called old. The power-loom, for instance, was little used in the Rhine country, the most progressive part of Germany, till the middle of last century. Less than twenty years ago about 90 per cent, of the fine silk and kindred fabrics at Krefeld was still made on hand looms ! So late as 1848, when Alfred Krupp took control of the iron business at Essen, which he made so celebrated, it consisted of an establishment of three workmen, and more debts than fortune. Coke for iron-smelting was coming into use about the same time. The annual output of pig-iron did not reach one million tons till 1866. GERMANY 35 We may roughly date the active progress of German}' as an industrial State in the modern sense from 1850, her active competi- tion in the world's markets from 1875. Industrial and commercial progress has naturally gone hand in hand with political progress. In the early part of the nineteenth century a bewildering and hampering maze of diverse tariffs and coinages rendered industrial movement difficult, just as the political condi- tions seemed to be an insuperable obstacle to the realization of national aspirations. Prussia led the way in solving both sets of difficulties. By 1834 substantial progress had been made in establishing a Zollverein, or Customs Union of German States. Between 1864 and 1871 Bismarck, in three wars — with Denmark, with Austria, and with France — made the political unity of Germany an accomplished fact. Recent progress has been rapid. One of its most notable features is that it has been based on knowledge and research in the widest sense. The present writer studied at three German universities — GiJttingen, Berlin, and Tubingen — and he 3—2 36 THE FISCAL PROBLEM came to the conclusion that the German universities were organized and equipped for the acquisition and imparting of knowledge as thoroughly as the German army was organized and equipped for war. The high position that Germany has now attained is due to enlightened, laborious, and persevering in- dustry. She has, besides, many great natural advan- tages. It is true that she has neither the soil nor climate of France. Much of her land is light and sandy, but her people make good use of it by patient labour. Her rivers, supplemented by canals, afford excellent waterways. She has a large railway system, with easy gradients, and she has great mineral wealth in coal, iron, zinc, lead, copper, salt, etc. All these points are, I dare say, known to my readers. A point that is less understood or appreciated is the very favourable geo- graphical position, which gives Germany special advantages for commercial competition. Her position in Central Europe places her in the very midst of about three hundred millions GERMANY 37 of Europeans who are advanced enough to value the benefits of commerce, but are for the most part unable to compete with her on equal terms. With most of those neighbour- ing countries Germany has a system of commercial treaties. The railways by which the Alps have been tunnelled bring her into direct communication with Italy and the Italian ports. A railway system controlled by Germany now extends beyond Konieh (the ancient Iconium), and is intended in due time to run on to Baghdad and the Persian Gulf. It is on the same gauge as that of Germany and Central Europe generally. Train-ferries convey the trains from Europe across the Bosporus to Haidar Pasha, near Skutari, the starting-point of the Asiatic lines. The opening of the Suez Canal has already to a large degree brought back European trade with the East to its ancient routes. The construction of the Baghdad Eailway will complete the process — an event of world- historic importance, which will give Germany an exceptionally advantageous position, as 38 THE FISCAL PROBLEM mainly controlling what will probably be the chief commercial route between the hundreds of millions of Europe and the vast populations of India and China. This great railway is a notable example of the use which Germany makes of her position as the head of the Central European Powers to promote her industrial and commercial aims. The main features of the industrial history and position of Germany, as they bear on the present controversy, may be summed up in a few salient points : 1. In Germany industry had begun to flourish before the present protective system was inaugurated in 1879. It has grown even more rapidly since 1879. Till 1879 the German States generally had a light tariff, approximating to Free Trade. Three great factors may be adduced as, at that date, determining the change towards Protection. The landed interest was menaced by the competition of American farm products. The rising industrial and commercial class in Germany felt themselves quite competent to supply the home market with industrial GERMANY 39 products, and wished to engross it for their own and their country's benefit. The Imperial Government wished to widen the basis of taxation, in order to provide the necessary armaments to wage a possible war on two fronts — on the east against Russia, on the west against France. Thus the powerful landed and commercial classes found themselves in accord with each other and with the Govern- ment, and all three could, with good show of reason, claim that they were speaking and acting as the champions of the highest and most urgent national interests. 2. As compared with this country Germany was very late in starting on her industrial development. She has been very rapidly gaining what we may call her natural position as an industrial nation. It is therefore quite misleading to contrast her rapid advance with our naturally slower rate of progress. 3. The German working class also started from a very low position fifty or sixty years ago. A day's work of fifteen hours, the lowest pay and the poorest diet — such was the lot of the German working man on the Rhine, 40 THE FISCAL PROBLEM in Saxony, and worst of all in Silesia. It was this labour — miserably fed and clothed and housed, and cheap in proportion to its effici- ency — which enabled German manufacturers even then to compete successfully in some departments of the world's market. The German workman had no leaders whom he could trust, and no political training. He had not the right of combination or of free speech in a free meeting. It is therefore totally misleading to contrast the present position of the British workman with that of the German. In point of fact, the German working class was making rapid progress in the years before 1879, and it has been making rapid progress since that year. 4. To industry Germany has applied in- telligence, trained, equipped, and organized in her universities and schools, higher and elementary, with remarkable results, especially in chemistry and electricity. We have con- tinued too long to confide in the qualities of energy and natural sagacity by which we won our early success. Brindley, the founder of our canal system, could barely read and write. GERMANY 4 1 James Watt had only the ordinary education of a Scottish boy of the lower middle class. George Stephenson could not read till the age of eighteen. The Germans have an energy and natural sagacity equal to our own, trained by methods far superior in thoroughness to ours. The moral is obvious. 5. German statesmen do not regard it as the quintessence of wisdom to stand apart from national industries and let things take their course ; but by using the whole influence of the State for the promotion of industry they seek to make things take the course that is best for their country. CHAPTER IV INDUSTRIAL POSITION OF AMERICA If we wish to understand the Fiscal Problem we must be able in some measure to appreciate the industrial position of our two great rivals, Germany and America. In my last chapter I gave a brief sketch of the position of Germany in its bearings on this country. I propose in the present chapter to give a similar survey of the United States. We all vaguely know a good deal about the great republic beyond the Atlantic. Let us try to refresh our view of it with some definite statements. In the first place, we should realize that it is not a country like those we have in Europe, but a self-contained and self- sufficing continent, almost equal in size to Europe itself. Including Alaska, it is just a 42 AMERICA 43 little less than Europe ; excluding Alaska, which is a cold and bleak region, valuable only for its minerals, furs, and fisheries, it is four- fifths the size of Europe. It consists of fifty States and territories, each of which on an average has an area greater than that of England and Wales. The single State of Texas has an area five times that of England and Wales. California is three times the size of England. We should further realize that in climate and in almost every variety of natural wealth the Western republic has advantages that we find nowhere else on the same scale in an} 7 country, with the possible exception of China. With the exception of Alaska, it lies entirely within the temperate zone. The waterways are magnificent. Hardly anywhere else on the globe is there so vast an extent of fertile soil with a sufficient rainfall. Its mineral wealth is enormous, and widely diffused. Besides the motive power derived from coal, it has a gigantic water-power, which may be converted into electric power. Let us take the single State of Alabama, 44 THE FISCAL PROBLEM which seems destined to play a very important part in the industrial development of America. The area of Alabama is about equal to that of England. It has enormous coal and iron mines, with vast quantities of the limestone used in the smelting of iron. Its forests yield valuable timber. Sugar, rice, and cotton, wheat and maize, and a great variety of fruits, are grown within its area. Its rivers afford water-power, which can be utilized for electric power. Thus we see that within the boundaries of a single State, which covers only one-sixtieth of the area of the republic, we have all the elements of an industrial progress which is simply gigantic. I have selected Alabama for special con- sideration for two reasons : it is already the seat of a vigorous iron industry ; and, above all, it is the seat of a rapidly-growing cotton manufacture, which is favoured by the very important facts that it has the raw materials, the motive power, and the cognate industries on the spot. The bearing of all this on the future of our Lancashire cotton industries is obvious. AMERICA 45 Little did the gentlemen adventurers who founded the first English colony in Virginia in 1607 dream of the enormous natural wealth contained in the land where they were settling. For several generations the new colonies continued to be agricultural, with the trades and industries that are subsidiary to agriculture. There was no great change for a long period after the Declaration of Inde- pendence. We may, indeed, date the rise of America as an industrial Power in the modern sense from 1850. Till that year coke had not been much used for iron-smelting. The annual production of pig-iron rose to one million tons for the first time in 1864. When she did begin to move ahead, it was with seven-league boots. The process of transformation from a system of hand and domestic industry to a mechanical industry organized in great factories was completed in less than a generation, let us say about 1878. We may now sum up in a few salient points the features of the industrial develop- ment of America, in special relation to the position of our own country. 46 THE FISCAL PROBLEM 1. America contains within her own borders nearly all the raw materials and appli- ances of industry on an enormous scale, and they are, generally speaking, more accessible, and therefore more easily worked, than in this country. This is one of the results of her more recent industrial developments. The more accessible seams of coal are the more easily worked ; access is obtained in some cases by an adit ; it is unnecessary to sink shafts. The same principle obtains with obvious modifications in other spheres. In agri- culture, for instance, no high-class farming is needed, for a time at least, to profit by the natural fertility of the prairie. 2. Owing to the comparative scarcity of labour, the Americans were obliged to have recourse to all manner of labour-saving devices. This was, however, in accordance with both the natural and acquired genius of the people. From the first the conditions under which the colonists lived in America made them laborious, enterprising, and resourceful. The colonist had to be equally handy with AMERICA 47 the rifle, the axe, and the plough ; with the saw, the hammer, and the plane. He had to make his own house and furniture, and many of his own tools and implements. His wife required to be no less handy. She took the wool as it came from the sheep, dyed, carded, and spun it, finally making it into clothing for her household. This need to master so many trades developed an individuality, ingenuity, readiness, and resource which have probably never been surpassed .since the world began. They had left the ruts and grooves and routine of Europe behind them. We need not wonder, therefore, that the Americans have shown such a marvellous shrewdness, initia- tive, and energy, and have carried inventive skill to a pitch unknown in this or any other country. 3. America is specially favoured with regard to motive power. Besides her enormous coal-fields, she has petroleum and natural gas. Above all, in her splendid rivers she has a water-power of almost incalculable vastness, convertible into electricity. With Canada and China, she stands in the very first rank 48 THE FISCAL PROBLEM amono- the countries of the world in this matter. The industrial and, with it, the political future of the world will largely depend on the possession of such water- power, the water-power being permanent, whereas the coal-fields may be exhausted, or at least not so easily worked. 4. The chiefs of American industry have carried organization to a degree unknown as yet in Europe, though in this respect they are finding excellent imitators or rivals in Ger- many. As she contains within herself nearly all that is needful for the canning on of the most diversified forms of industry, they can be organized from the very rawest of raw materials to the highest of finished products. 5. One of the greatest difficulties in organ- izing American industry, the lack of labour on a scale commensurate with the require- ments of such a vast country, is being gradu- ally overcome. Every year she receives some hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Europe, mostly young people in the prime of life — an economic power of vast importance. 6. As a result of the great size and AMERICA 49 enormous resources of America, all her indus- tries can be conducted on a gigantic scale. In modern mechanical industry this is a vital point, quantity or size being of the very essence of success. CHAPTER V SUCCESS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION It should be clear that in Germany, and especially in the United States of America, we have competitors of a very formidable kind. But we shall be better able to judge how far there is a need for a change in our fiscal policy if we form a definite conception of the conditions which make for success in modern industry. In this chapter I propose to give a summary of these conditions, with reference to the three countries which are now the chief competitors in the world's markets — Great Britain, Germany, and America. The first set of conditions making for success are to be found in the natural advan- tages which each country possesses. These natural advantages consist in good geo- 50 INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION 51 graphical position, in a favourable soil and climate, in natural waterways which facilitate communication, in mineral wealth, and in forests. No country in the world, with the possible exception of China, as I have already said, possesses such a superb combination of natural advantages on such an enormous scale as the United States. It can raise all its own food in almost exhaustless abundance and variety within its own borders. The variety and vastness of its raw materials are equally great. Besides the power derivable from coal, it has in its rivers an inexhaustible supply of motive power, which is convertible into electric power. I have already touched on these points in the chapter on the industrial position of America, and now say no more here ; but we cannot lay too great emphasis on this side of the question, and it is hardly possible to exaggerate its importance. Great Britain and Germany are very far behind America in this respect. A second set of conditions making for success are to be found in the character of the peoples of these three countries, in the 4—2 52 THE FISCAL PROBLEM skill, energy, and general efficiency of the workmen, and in the skill, insight, and initiative shown in management and organization by the industrial chiefs. With regard to those matters it is not easy to make comparisons. Few who know Germany well will, however, deny that the workmen of that country are more frugal and temperate, more law-abiding and better disciplined, than British workmen. The American workman also is more temperate than the British, and he has a higher nervous organization, partly, at least, due to the clearer and more stimulat- ing air in which he lives. On the other hand, neither the American nor the German work- man has to a like degree that special combina- tion of energy and of staying-power which characterizes the Briton. But in too many respects things are not as they should be with us. In regard to the whole subject, we should recognise that we are now suffering for the sins of our fathers. How many of our defects in England are summed up in the single statement that we had no national system of education till 1870! INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION 53 The founders of the great American Commonwealth were wiser men. The school- house rose side by side with the church in every New England village from the begin- ning of the settlements over there. From the outset the wits of the people were sharpened by a sound school education, by the management of their own local affairs, and by theological controversy, as well as by the struggle with the uncleared and untilled wilderness, and with the savage Indians. We need not wonder, then, that the Yankee became the cutest and toughest of mankind, and that he and such as he in America are now making their mark in the business of the world. But the Americans had the good sense not to trust entirely in their own schools and in the natural intelligence with which they had been endowed. From an early period of the nineteenth century many of their best men have studied at German Universities. In all branches of knowledge, from philology to chemistry, the Americans have thus learned from the best teachers in the world. Here, again, they have had a great advantage over 54 THE FISCAL PROBLEM England. While a medieval obscurity still reigned at our Universities the Americans were lighting theirs with the newest German lamps. A third set of conditions on which success in modern industry depends are inherent in the very nature of that industry. As we said in a previous chapter, modern industry began in the eighteenth century with a great series of mechanical inventions, by which machinery was made to do the work of the human hand. Such machinery could be made and procured only by men who possessed a considerable capital, and it could be utilized only in factories where a considerable number of workmen were employed, with a suitable division of labour. These factories, again, turned out a large quantity of goods, which could be cheaply sold in a large market. We see, therefore, that mechanical industry means a large production in comparison with the hand industry which it displaced. With a large production you can sell at a low price, which is suited to a large market. Thus machinery, with an adequate motive power, INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION 55 a large capital, organization of labour on a large scale in a factory, cheap goods, and a large market form parts of an organic whole — that is to say, each element in this system implies all the rest, just as the organs of the human body imply and depend on each other. Such large production also implies a large improvement and growth in the means of communication ; otherwise the raw material could not be brought to the factory, or the finished product carried from the factory to the consumers in sufficient quantities. But the large industry which began to supersede hand industry during the eighteenth century would now be regarded as very small. The first cotton factories, for example, used water-power, and were therefore small. Since that time we have seen a long process by which one stage in the large industry has incessantly been leading on towards a stage still larger. Size and quantity have been deciding factors at every step, for the very simple reason that cheapness goes with size. The large production is cheap production, and 56 THE FISCAL PROBLEM the larger the cheaper. Size, therefore, is of the very essence of success in modern industrial competition. These statements may to some readers seem rather abstract, and to many they may appear elementary. I have laid emphasis upon them because they form the key, not only to success in modern industry, but to the fiscal problem. Their force and cogency rest on the fundamental principle in human nature that men will not go on giving sixpence for an article if they can get one equally satisfactory for three- pence. If the Germans and Americans, with their immense output, and the very profitable prices they obtain in their protected home markets, can sell at lower prices in our markets than our manufacturers can, the staple industries on which the prosperity of this country depends must go down. This dumping, we shall see, is only another phase of the triumph of cheap- ness, based on the larger production, which has marked the whole course of industrial evolution since the middle of the eighteenth century. INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION 57 But some may say size is not everything*. Neither it is. Skill in organizing and managing counts for a great deal. But in modern industry there is no contradiction between the two factors, skill and size. Skill shows itself most of all in understanding the conditions of the market and in adapting to them the whole mechanism of business. The skilled employer or manager utilizes all the conditions under which he works to produce the most satisfactory article at the cheapest profitable price, and he can do so only by producing on a very large scale. Skill and size, instead of being opposed, are really complements of each other. The greatest skill and the largest size are combined to produce the highest efficiency and the utmost possible cheapness. The large scale cheapness and success go together in modern industry. But in comparing the three countries we must take into account all the three sets of conditions on which success depends : natural resources, skill and efficiency of labour and of management, and scale. CHAPTER VI FREEDOM AND PROGRESS In order to understand Free Trade, it will be well to consider the wider meanings and relations of freedom, especially in the light of history. In the historical development of the world the first interests which men aimed at have been security against foreign invasion and order at home, with some approximation to justice. Personal and individual freedom has in past times been sacrificed to this prime need for national independence and security and for internal order. After order and security had been estab- lished came the desire for freedom in the widest sense, and for progress. Valuable in themselves, we need not say that freedom and 58 FREEDOM 59 progress are much more valuable in their combination. Freedom was the supreme ideal of the ancient Greeks. We may regard it also as, on the whole, the supreme ideal of modern times. For several generations it has been the watchword of enlightened and progressive men in religious, political, and social life. It has undoubtedly been a principle of sovereign value and efficacy, and we must all ardently wish for its widest application and extension, in so far as it is consistent with other great human interests and ideals. We may regard freedom, including freedom of trade, as the goal of the human race. But for the present this very desirable consumma- tion cannot be attained as we could wish, because of the imperfections in our moral, social, and national development. Even in our present stage, however, we may safely go the length of maintaining that there should always be a presumption in favour of freedom; that is to say, unless we see some cogent and valid argument, based on morality, order, or reason, for limiting 60 THE FISCAL PROBLEM freedom, we may assume that its claims should prevail. While this is so, we must recognise that the sacred cause of freedom has been the excuse for every kind of disorder, unwisdom, and cruelty. Even yet there are many who seem to believe that the mere name has a magical potency to decide the most important and difficult questions in religion, politics, and social life. The harm thus done is incalculable. A great name and cause have thereby been too often discredited. Human progress has been arrested and turned back. Our want of moral and intellectual prepara- tion for the high calling which the life of freedom means is the chief explanation of our failures. In these circumstances we need not be surprised that the progress of freedom has in many respects been grievously disappointing. Progress has probably been greater during the last hundred years than at any other period of the world's history. Yet we may safely say that everyone of the recent movements for freedom has left behind it FKEEDOM G 1 profound regrets and a painful sense of failure. The French Revolution, the move- ment for negro emancipation, Parliamentary reform in England, Free Trade, the struggles for national freedom in Greece, Hungary, Italy, and Germany, the more recent efforts after economic freedom — these and many others were ushered in and accompanied with great waves of enthusiasm, raised the highest hopes, and have resulted in a considerable measure of success, but have also caused the bitterest disappointment even to those who have learned to be moderate in their expectations. There is no doubt that enthusiasm and idealism will always find reality rather cold and disenchanting. The sense of novelty wears off, and the new thing which we have achieved by so much sacrifice soon begins to have a prosaic and commonplace look. Every change, however successful, must therefore be more or less disappointing, especially to the idealist and enthusiast. The world and human nature have been so made, and we must accept the consequences with what resignation we can command. 62 THE FISCAL PROBLEM Many of the disappointments connected with the development of freedom are un- doubtedly due to the fact that we have not sufficiently recognised the conditions under which freedom can be realized. A slight study of the principles which govern the life of nations in their relation to each other might have prevented the disappointment which has been associated with the history of Free Trade, and perhaps might have materially modified English policy in carrying it out. A little knowledge of the laws of heredity which control the development of races might likewise have prevented the disappointments which have attended the emancipation of the negroes, and possibly might have led to the adoption of more educative methods of treating them. If observers of the French Revolution had given more attention to the laws of history and heredity, it would have saved the world from unutterable trouble at the time and from much labour of unnecessary disquisition since. And we may add that an elementary knowledge of geography would have delivered mankind from many illusions FREEDOM 63 and mistakes regarding the probable develop- ment of freedom in Greece, Italy, and Germany. It may be said, indeed, that enthusiasm and the judicial faculty are in their nature not com- patible. This is to a large extent true. There is, we are sorry to say, a real contradiction between the insight which is the true guid- ing star of progress and the enthusiasm which is its needful motive power. Some might even go on to maintain that as knowledge extends enthusiasm tends to wane. This is only partially correct, but experience no doubt shows that it is difficult to associate enthusiasm with real insight into facts and principles. Enthusiasm is invaluable and indispensable for the achieving of anything great. The progressive movements of the world have generally, if not always, been carried forward on great waves of enthusiasm ; but, unfortu- nately, this great motive power has often been miserably wasted because it has not been guided by knowledge. It would appear to be the persuasion of many that a good cause and 64 THE FISCAL PROBLEM unlimited devotion to it are a sufficient equip- ment in the great warfare of reform. History has proved over and over again the falsity of such a belief. In the history of the world nothing is more melancholy than to contem- plate how the fervid enthusiasms which seemed strong enough to sweep away every abuse and to make all things new have been rendered of little or no avail owing to the want of a wise perception of the route to follow, of ends that were attainable, and of means that were available and applicable under the circumstances that then prevailed. We may take it for granted that the world will again see many an example of this lamentable waste of precious force, but it behoves every true friend of progress to contribute his mite towards averting the too frequent recurrence of such disasters. Men have often been helped out of the difficulty by the fact that you may have enthusiasm in the rank and file, while the insight is supplied by the leaders. This solution is a good one, truly ; but in order to reach it we must fulfil two hard conditions — FREEDOM 65 we must discover the requisite leaders, and the rank and file must be willing to obey — which bring us back pretty nearly to our original difficulty. In truth, if we consider the matter rightly, zeal and enthusiasm are really only neutral qualities, which cannot be pronounced either good or bad until we find how they are directed, what ends they aim at, and by what means. While, therefore, progress cannot be accomplished without the motive power, en- thusiasm, it depends still more essentially on the adoption of worthy and practical aims, on real insight into the principles which control human life generally, and the facts which condition any particular movement. In social politics, as in other spheres, the last word is that of the Hebrew sage : ' Wisdom is the principal thing ; therefore get wisdom ; yea, with all thou hast gotten get understand- ing.' The great aim of wise reform must be to end the sad divorce of insight and enthusiasm which has occurred so frequently and has continued so long. It is, therefore, of the first importance that 5 66 THE FISCAL PROBLEM we should study the conditions under which progress and that freedom which is one of its most precious elements can be realized. Reformers should learn to recognise that it is a dead waste of time to contend against the inevitable, and that it is a first part of wisdom to distinguish between the attainable and unattainable. On every hand we are sur- rounded by facts, either natural or historical, some of which can be modified in varying degrees, but others can hardly be modified at all by human agency. To learn how to deal with them, how to adapt ourselves to them, and how to adapt them to us, is an imperious task, if our efforts after freedom are to have the success which we would desire. The great masters in teaching the world the theory and practice of freedom have been the Greeks. A brief glance at their history brings out in a striking way some of the conditions by which the development of freedom is controlled, and throws considerable light on the difficulties of the greatest political question of the present day — the Eastern Question. Broken up as it was FREEDOM 67 by mountain and sea, ancient Greece was singularly adapted for the growth of free life in the city States which then prevailed. But it was also very badly adapted for the development of the centralized State in the wider form which has been necessary for the permanent preservation of national life. Ancient Greece failed to pass though this process of consolidation. The result was that she had to bow before the supremacy of Macedonia, directed by the energy and ability of Philip and Alexander, and both were obliged to submit to Rome. On the division of the Roman Empire, the Eastern half, in which the Greek language and influence prevailed, was for many centuries entrusted with a task of the highest historical import. In this phase of Greek history there was centralization on the largest scale, but it was centralization at the cost of all free and healthy life. Throughout this period, nevertheless, the Greek race continued to fulfil its great mis- sion as the bulwark of European freedom and civilization against the semi-barbarism of the 5—2 68 THE FISCAL PROBLEM East and the barbarism of the North, till at last, after a changeful career of a thousand years, and after transmitting culture and Christianity to the barbarians of the North, it fell before the unspeakable Turk. During this awful process the Greeks have been crushed, broken, and dispersed to a degree which hardly any other nation has experienced. As they have been the teachers of freedom to the human race, so also have they been its heroes and its martyrs. It must surely be the ardent wish of all who understand the historic deserts of the nations, and who desire to see a reasonable measure of justice obtain among them, that the Greek race should again play a worthy role in the world. If it now had been strong enough in some form to restore the Byzantine Empire, to supplant the Turk in Europe and push him eastwards in Asia, the Eastern Question would be solved. But the Greeks as they now survive are only a remnant of what they might have been. And besides the disadvantage arising from their small numbers, they bear what is, perhaps, equally fatal — the moral FEEEDOM 69 wounds inflicted during ages of degradation under the heel of the oppressor. Let us all hope that Greece may recover from her old wounds, and be enabled to re-enter on her old inheritance. Greece, it is evident, never solved the hard but elementary problem which all great peoples must face — how to reconcile free and healthy local and individual life with the strength derived from consolidation over a wide area. It is equally clear how greatly the development of Greek freedom at the Eastern outposts of civilization has been influenced by geographical facts which are too obvious to need explanation here. In truth, no nation can escape the influence of the geographical conditions under which it lives. Thus the fact that the modern German Empire is geographically situated between two such Powers as France and Russia gives an inevitable form and colouring to the whole national life. The imperative requirements of self-preservation make Germany above all things a military State, with institutions which are all more or less modified in accordance 70 THE FISCAL PROBLEM with the military type. This is unfortunate, but inevitable ; and all aspirations after German freedom, economic, social, and political, must take account of this funda- mental fact. The career of modern Italy also as a free and united nation of the first rank is sadly obstructed by certain elementary considera- tions of a geographical, or, if we go further back, of a geological, nature which are too stubborn to be overcome. Italy has a limited area which is deficient in the minerals required for modern industrial uses, and a large part of her soil is not particularly productive. Under these circumstances the development of a free life for her overcrowded population cannot be easy or happy. Nations live not by freedom alone ; they must have bread. In two important points recent changes are operating in her favour. The opening of the Suez Canal restored to her her advantageous position for trade with the East, and her mountain streams are useful for providing electric power. But these are hardly sufficient to compensate for her other defects. FREEDOM 7 1 Geological forces, which have dealt thus unkindly with modern Italy, have also materi- ally controlled for good or evil the destinies of Ireland. Those forces have fixed her im- movably where she is, not near enough fully to share in the corporate life of England, and not far enough away to enjoy a life inde- pendent of the larger island. As the sug- gestion made by John Bright about unmoor- ing her and refixing her two thousand miles out in the Atlantic is not a practical one. Ireland and England must remain in close partnership ; and any scheme of self-govern- ment which is likely to succeed must corre- spond with the facts of Nature. Perhaps one ought to apologize for making reference to matters so elementary, but it may be necessary to be elementary when even statesmen in Italy and elsewhere imagine that nations can safely act in defiance of facts unchangeably established by geological forces untold ages before the puny race of man made its mark on this planet. Let us now glance at a set of facts which are not so immovable as geology, but which certainly 72 THE FISCAL PROBLEM originated long ago. These are the facts con- veyed in the modern conception of heredity, which are undoubtedly capable of large modi- fication — how far capable is uncertain. Nations and races have their heredity, and it will probably affect their history for all time, so far as our interest in time extends. On the great question whether all the races of mankind have proceeded from a single centre we need not enter now. We know that since they emerged into the light of history the different races have shown heredi- tary differences of temperament which are much more deeply seated than the colour of their skin. It is a fallacy largely due to the influence of Rousseau and his school that there was an original, simple, and unadulter- ated human nature, which you could easily restore by clearing away the evil effects of a corrupt civilization. This fallacy still lives, and vitiates some of our theories of progress. Modern research has entirely disproved the idea, and it should now be dead. But such ideas die hard. This theory of the Rousseau school assumed FREEDOM 73 that the common people were good. We know that they are of like passions as the aristoc- racy. It drew pictures of the free and noble savage. Research proves beyond a doubt that the savage is neither free nor noble. Races like the native Australians and North American Indians had no real freedom of their own, and it is doubtful whether they would be able to acquire ours, even if they should survive in any numbers to make the attempt. Children in impulse and in mental organization generally, they seem by their natural and hereditary temperament unable to assimilate our civilization, or even really to understand it. By many of the good people who assisted in the freeing 1 of the negro it was believed that on the morrow of his emancipation he would come forth in all the virtues of a Christian gentleman. To those who know anything of the heredity and history of the poor blacks such expectations appear utterly groundless. Not the defects owing to slavery alone, but deep-seated characteristics, dating from the life of their ancestors in Africa, 74 THE FISCAL PROBLEM stood in the way of the realization of such a dream. The coloured races in Hayti, Jamaica, and the Southern States of America have turned out as their antecedents and sur- roundings might have led us to anticipate. The freedom they have obtained is of a suffi- ciently mixed and doubtful sort. There, as elsewhere, facts move in their sadly realistic way, and the ideal is ignored or kept waiting. The whole problem of the relation of the nearo races of Africa to our ideals of freedom is a hard and complex one, on which no dis- creet man would care to dogmatize. For the Bantu race, which, however, seems to have a mixture of Semitic blood, the courage, disci- pline, and self-sacrifice shown by the Zulus justify us in anticipating no mean future. As regards the yellow races of the Far East, which stand on a higher plane, the question is different. In the present war the yellow race has won its spurs through its champions, the Japanese. Whatever the final result of the contest may be, it has already proved that once they have mastered the weapons and the methods of the West the men of the yellow FREEDOM 7 5 race are able to hold their own against Euro- peans. Their past failures were not owing to any inherent want of capacit} r , as some believed. It is likely enough, however, that the races of the East, after partially learning the lessons of a free civilization under the guidance or supremacy of Europeans, will, like the Japanese, dispense with their masters, and thereafter run a course of development better suited to themselves. For our present pur- pose it is clear enough that ideals of emanci- pation, without distinction of class, or creed, or colour, must, in view of long-established differences in racial characteristics, receive the most serious modification. So much for the conception of heredity as it may affect the races that lie beyond the European circle of States. Let us now glance at the conception in its relation to one of the greatest efforts for freedom ever made in the world, the French Revolution. After genera- tions of discipline under Roman and Frank, Valois and Bourbon, the groundwork of the French character was substantially the same at the Revolution as that which Caesar found 76 THE FISCAL PROBLEM in Gaul. Moreover, the structure of society continued to be essentially the same down to the eve of the Revolution ; the mass of the people of no political account, and over them the privileged classes, the nobles and the priest- hood. An attentive reader of the " Gallic War" will find in it the beginnings and ele- ments of the " Feudal System." The Christian clergy had indeed, displaced the ancient Druids — a great change, but not one of structure. There was only one material difference in the social structure : that the country had been consolidated into a monarchy, a process to- wards which Gaul was ineffectually tending when Ceesar came on the scene. Till the time of the Revolution nothing had been done to give the mass of the people any political education, to train them in the principles and the practice of self-government, or to cultivate those habits of civic self-control which are absolutely essential for the growth of freedom. The old government and the old social structure were inefficient and corrupt, and therefore doomed. Underneath all this was the old Celtic temperament, ingenious, FREEDOM 77 brilliant, and capable of tbe most fervid devo- tion and enthusiasm, but mobile also and liable to terrible fits of excitement and panic. When such a people, thus goaded by feelings of immemorial injustice and degradation, at last find their opportunity, awful conse- quences are likely to ensue. It was a soil prepared for the theories of Rousseau and the other men of the literary class who now appeared as the spokesmen of a cause that had so long been voiceless ; and under the circum- stances it was natural, too, that the crudest and most superficial ideas should find most acceptance. Historians have been much concerned with the question, when the old regime fell with a mighty crash, how far it might have been possible, at some convenient point, to arrest the rapidly-developing catastrophe. If the able man had come forward, they say, at the right moment he might have stopped the headlong pace and produced a moderate Revolution. To this it is obvious to reply that the forces of heredity and of history had been 78 THE FISCAL PROBLEM inevitably preparing, or been allowed to prepare, for a change which was not moderate. If we consider the state of things for a while, we shall find that they were not calculated to produce the wise and ex- perienced man who might be able to deal with such an unprecedented situation. Where was he to come from ? The men of the old regime were in general corrupt, incapable, hide-bound by the prejudices and traditions of their class. The men who were accessible to the new ideas were unequal to the task. Turgot was an austere doctrinaire ; Necker, as Adam Smith said, was a man of detail, and was totally unfit to cope with the Revolution ; Mirabeau was at the outset discredited by his wild early life, and was soon prematurely exhausted by excess. If the wise and able statesman had been forthcoming when he was so urgently wanted, how persuade the two great parties, the old and the new, to listen to him ? The people of the old regime wearied of Turgot in twenty months, though affairs were still calm, and their own salvation, if they had but known it, FREEDOM 79 depended on taking his advice. How could the revolutionists, whose head and heart were charged with the wild and seductive theories of Rousseau, be induced to follow the voice of wisdom ? If anything can be considered certain in such a season of national hurricane, it is that neither of the conflicting parties will lend an ear to moderate counsels. On the whole, with regard to the progress of the French Revolution, it is an idle specula- tion what might or might not have happened if such and such a contingency inconsistent with the facts had occurred. Evils and ineptitudes that have been accumulating for generations cannot be got rid of with the same facility as we fling aside an old coat. At the French Revolution the laws of historic causa- tion were not suspended that the way of transgressors might be made easy for them. That great event is a stern monition to all rulers who have not a due regard for the rights and the civic education of their subjects that a day of reckoning may come. It should also be clear that it is a gross injustice to put down the excesses of the 80 THE FISCAL PROBLEM Revolution to the discredit of the demo- cracy ; they were the natural outcome of the old order, and the old order should be held responsible for them. It is doubtful if even yet France has succeeded in throwing off the evil habits engendered by the old regime. Let us now briefly consider how the develop- ment of freedom at the present day is affected by the conditions of nationality which have been so powerfully intensitied during the last half-century. For some centuries the political struggles of Europe were chiefly controlled by considerations of dynasty connected with the Hapsburg-Spanish and the Bourbon lines, with the Houses of Tudor, Stuart, and Brunswick. The dynasty is now for the most part superseded by the nation. Whether this intensifying of national forces will eventually lead to the limitation of the military power in society it would need a bold man to prophesy. It is certainly a most interesting field of inquiry. There can be no doubt that as an existing stage in human development it carries with it the most serious FREEDOM 8 1 consequences to human freedom. As a result of the growth of the national idea the old professional army has on the Continent been superseded by the armed nation, a phenome- non which made its entry in world-history at the French Revolution, to the astonish- ment and dismay of European statesmen, and w r hich, inspired by the enthusiasm of the Revolution, made France so long victorious against united Europe. After Jena France was followed by Prussia, and now all over Europe we have the spectacle of nations in arms. The obstacles to human freedom offered by this development of militarism are so familiar to the English mind that we need not dwell upon them here. It will be more profitable to remark on the tendencies making for freedom which are contained in the idea of the armed nation. In the first place, it is surely an important step in advance that the dynasty has been displaced by the nation as the pivot of political evolution. It must also be regarded as a strongly progressive factor that in the present system of scientific war- 6 82 THE FISCAL PROBLEM fare the most efficient soldier will be the free, intelligent citizen who knows what he is fighting for. The adoption of the system of universal military service has brought with it the adoption of universal education. In the armed nation, moreover, it will be a most serious element of weakness if any consider- able section of the population should be discontented, or debilitated either in body or mind, from economic causes. Thus, if we regard the existing militarism as inevitable in the present stage of social evolution, it has also the compensating advantages that it is bringing with it continual improvements in education, the cultivation of a freer and more intelligent civic life, and substantial instal- ments of reform in the social-economic sphere. When Free Trade was adopted by England it was expected by many sanguine people that other nations would soon follow her example. They have not done so, and the disappointment has been great. The explana- tion of the failure is largely to be found in the national evolution of the last fifty years. FREEDOM 83 To guard against even the remote possibility of misapprehension, we need hardly say that Free Trade was the right policy for England, and the only one open to her. The point we wish to bring out here is that the progress of Free Trade on the Continent was limited and obstructed by the interests and necessities of national life. The life of nations is not comprehended and summed up in the business of buying and selling. If the promoters of Free Trade in this country had possessed a deeper insight into the development of Con- tinental countries, they would not have been so sanguine about the speedy triumph of their cause. Cobden himself, w T ho knew the Continent more thoroughly than most of his contemporaries, should not have been so sanguine. The fact that he was so over- confident of the speedy success of Free Trade is the strongest proof that he and his friends failed to read the signs of the time in some of its most important features. If a deeper knowledge had prevailed, it perhaps might have modified with advantage the manner of our adopting Free Trade. 6—2 84 THE FISCAL PROBLEM The recent development of national life has, therefore, many features, some favourable and some unfavourable, to freedom, which may be greatly modified, but which in the main may be regarded as at present inevitable. Not the least of its unhappy features is that the military spirit by which it is attended leads to the fostering of ideals which are opposed to a healthy and genial freedom. Militarism con- tinues to be a fetish, with too much of the unreason of fetish worship. But, after all, it is questionable whether the worship of the cruel god Moloch is much more unfavourable to true freedom than the worship of the base god Mammon, which has its chief seat in English-speaking countries. Mammon, as we know, was the least erected spirit that fell from heaven, and his service cannot be a good training for a noble and enduring freedom. However great may be the evils of the military spirit, it has the advantage of providing a kind of discipline which is essential for the preservation of communities. For we must remember that freedom cannot continue to exist without discipline ; and FREEDOM 8 5 the higher the freedom the higher the discipline that will be needed. As the freedom which all progressive men desire grows and is perfected, so will the discipline which is required to correct and strengthen it need to be perfected. A real and enduring freedom must be based on and associated with character, which must ever largely be the result of discipline. The deficiency in the element of discipline is certainly one of the most doubtful things regarding the future of freedom in the English-speaking world. The discipline of the family and o£ the school has grown weak. The discipline of religion is growing weak. The discipline of the military system is almost wanting. The discipline provided by the industrial system, whilst effectual enough in many ways, would assuredly be more whole- some if it were not so seriously vitiated by the service of Mammon. When we consider the history and present condition of the two great races, the Anglo- Saxon and the Slav, on which the future of the world depends so much, we are struck by the 86 THE FISCAL PROBLEM contrast which they present in this respect. The Slav has had discipline enough, both of the army and of the police, and with it the minimum of freedom. In the English-speak- ing world freedom grows, but discipline is declining. The old disciplines have been disappearing. How are the new ones going to take shape ? From the foregoing we may, among other things, see how little can be gained by con- sidering freedom as an abstract conception. It is, indeed, one of the worst of political habits to bandy about the sacred name of freedom, whether as abstraction or catchword. We must view it in the light of history, and history teaches us that a substantial and enduring freedom can be realized only if we have regard to the concrete circumstances which go to constitute our environment. We must consider the geographical facts, on which the economic condition of a people depends ; without some measure of economic opportunities and advantages freedom may be little better than an idle word. We must, moreover, give due weight to all that is FREEDOM 87 contained in the idea of heredity. We must have regard to character, for on character, above all other things, depends the kind of freedom of which a race or nation is capable. And without the discipline of history, without an adequate social discipline, true freedom cannot be realized. In other words, true freedom can be attained only by conformity to reason, morality, and order. We may therefore lose much by undue insistence on the idea of free- dom. If we use it thoughtlessly, as a mere catchword or formula by which we can with- out further trouble solve, as we imagine, the most difficult questions, we shall simply bring upon ourselves every kind of disappointment. Indeed, we may find it the most ruinous and fatal method of saving ourselves trouble that could be devised. Historical progress is a most complex matter, which will be confused and retarded by one-sided watchwords. Freedom, important though it is, is only one factor in well-being. No question can be solved by appealing to it alone. The best social progress — we might 88 THE FISCAL PROBLEM say the only real and enduring social progress — can be attained only through the balance and harmony of many principles and forces. Above all, we must insist on two cardinal points. An enduring freedom for average humanity must have a solid economic basis. And we must remember that the moral forces govern the world ; true freedom is possible only for those who are loyal to moral law. We may rest assured that in trade, as in all other departments of human activity, freedom can be realized only in so far as moral law is wrought into our spiritual tissue and becomes the daily and spontaneous ordering of our lives. CHAPTER VII FREE TRADE IN THE LIGHT OF HISTORY So much with regard to freedom generally. Let us now briefly consider the question of Free Trade in the light of history. In previous chapters we have already made some remarks on this aspect of our subject. But it is so important that we need offer no apology for returning to it. And here we may begin by quoting the well-known passage from Adam Smith : " All systems either of preference or of restraint, therefore, being thus completely taken away, the obvious and simple system of natural liberty estab- lishes itself of its own accord. Every man, as long as he does not violate the laws of justice, is left perfectly free to pursue his own interest his own way, and to bring both his industry and capital into competition 89 90 THE FISCAL PROBLEM with those of any other man, or order of men. The Sovereign is completely discharged from a duty, in the attempting to perform which he must always be exposed to innumerable delusions, and for the proper performance of which no human wisdom or knowledge could ever be sufficient— the duty of superintending the industry of private people, and of directing it towards the employments most suitable to the interest of the society.""' If we consider the above statement in the light of history, a few observations naturally occur to us. The " Wealth of Nations " was published in 1776, when George III. had been on the throne for sixteen years, and Louis XY. had been dead for only two years. No one will contend that such Sovereigns were com- petent to direct the private industry of their subjects. They were disposed only to main- tain restraints which had become antiquated, vexatious, and oppressive. We need not wonder that Adam Smith entertained strong ideas as to the incompetence of Governments. * " Wealth of Nations," Book IV., chap. ix. FREE TRADE 91 In the same year (1776) the first working steam-engine on Watt's model was turned out of the Soho Works at Birmingham. This event may be regarded as the beginning of an industrial revolution, which meant the set- ting aside of old methods and the break- ing down of old barriers throughout the world. It meant freedom, therefore, in the sphere of industry in a very wide and real sense. But this freedom was free competition, and brought with it evils innumerable. Children were drafted from charities and workhouses to supply labour to the newly- established factories, round which a working population grew up which was of very poor physique, uneducated, and demoralized by long hours of drudgery. To remedy evils which had become intolerable a Government more enlightened and less incompetent than those with which Adam Smith was familiar was obliged to intervene with Factory Acts which seriously limited the freedom of the manu- facturers. Thus the free competition under the "obvious and simple system of natural 92 THE FISCAL PROBLEM liberty " led to terrible evils, which required a new system of restraints. No one need now lose time in defending the Factory Acts. They have been incorporated more or less into the legislation and adminis- tration of every civilized country. Nor need one lose time in justifying the principle of trade unions, which are necessary to maintain the interests of adult male labour, as the Factory Acts were directed towards promoting the well-being of working women and children. Trade unions involve a limitation of the free- dom of individual workmen in order the better to secure the collective good of their class. Or we may put the matter in this way : Individual freedom is in certain respects limited so as to maintain a real and substantial freedom for the whole class. With the general question of trade unions we are not concerned here : we may assume merely that they have done good in the main. They have certainly been to the workmen a neces- sary instrument in the assertion of their rights under the competitive system of industry. FREE TRADE 93 Richard Cobden, who may be regarded as, in England, the executor of the principles of Adam Smith, was not favourable to the Factory Acts, and he was bitterly hostile to trade unions. " Depend upon it," he wrote to his brother, "nothing can be got by fraterniz- ing with trade unions. They are founded on principles of brutal tyranny and monopoly. I would rather live under a Dey of Algiers than a trades committee." Trade unions are still in many respects a subject of dispute ; but there can be no doubt that on the main question as to their necessity and usefulness reason and history alike have decided against Cobden and his friends. In a matter which is far more important even than trade unions, history has decided also against the one-sided exponents of individual freedom. The Corn Laws were repealed in 1846. Only two years afterwards, in 1848, began a move- ment for national development, which, more than anything else, probably, has moulded the history of the world since that time. At that date Germany, Italy, and Hungary made great efforts to secure a free life, undisturbed 94 THE FISCAL PROBLEM by external interference. In the case of Germany and Italy the aim was also to remove internal divisions, but in all these cases the end was the same — a free and full national life, which had been the ideal of ardent patriots for generations. For the time these efforts failed, only, however, to be successfully renewed under other circumstances in later years ; and Germany, Italy, and Hungary have now for over a generation had the free national development which they claimed. Partly owing to their example, but still more owing to the operation of the same causes as influenced them, the principle of nationality has had a new power in Europe. The consequences for Free Trade have been serious. The principle of nationality has led to fresh elements of conflict, or given additional force to the old ones. In the struggle of nations, economic factors play a leading part. The existence of the nation depends on an efficient army, and an efficient army depends on sufficient finance ; and a sufficient finance can be secured only through the development of FREE TRADE 95 the national resources, which, again, can be attained only through an adequate develop- ment of the national industries. Moreover, the implements and the aptitudes needed for success in the scientific warfare of the present day depend directly on the state of industrial development. Factories like those at Elswick and Essen are the result and the expression of a highly-developed industrial technique. As the industries of the Continent could not formerly compete against those of Great Britain, Protection was a necessity for them — at least, in the early stages of their develop- ment. For the nations of the Continent, there- fore, the question of a protective system or of Free Trade has not been a matter of choice : it has been a question of national existence. At the present day, however, the struggle among the leading European nations can hardly be described as one for mere existence, as it is with China, owing to her lack of military efficiency. Among the nations included in the European circle of States it is a struggle for a privileged existence — for an existence involving certain advantages, 96 THE FISCAL PROBLEM especially those o£ an economic character. Germany, for instance, having asserted her right to be a united nation, untrammelled by external interference, desires to have " a place in the sun." In other words, she wishes to have colonies in Africa and elsewhere, spheres of influence in China, influence through her railways and her industrial undertakings in Asia Minor, and along with all these a grow- ing commerce, which will serve as an outlet for her home industries. Such advantages she believes can be best secured among other measures by a well-devised tariff, which will strengthen her home industries, and at the same time protect her agrarian population, on which the military power of the Empire so largely depends. Considerations of an analogous nature have led our Canadian and Australian colonies also to adopt protective tariffs. They are not, like Germany, exposed on many sides to invasion by powerful neighbours ; the shadowy fear of war with the United States need have no great influence on Canadian politics. But they very naturally desire a more fully-developed FREE TRADE 97 national life than is possible by agriculture or mining merely. These two interests, great as they are, do not afford sufficient scope for an enterprising people, conscious of a mighty future. Besides, the development of manu- factures on a wide scale can alone offer an adequate market for the food and the raw materials produced by agriculture and mining. In other words, those great colonies, which are only at the beginning of a career vast beyond human forecast, are desirous of a more complete and better-developed national exist- ence than was possible for them as agricultural provinces of the industrial Motherland. With them Protection is not a matter of necessity, as it is with Germany, but is based on the most enlightened and honourable motives connected with their national life. Thus we see that the vast development of the nation both in principle and practice has had a dominating influence on tariff questions, leading to most important limitations on indi- vidual freedom in the spheres of industry and trade. And it will be seen how closely a free national life and a fully- developed national 7 98 THE FISCAL PROBLEM life are associated, being indeed essential the one to the other. In Great Britain we have been so long accustomed to both that we have painfully to remind ourselves of the elementary conditions on which they depend. CHAPTER VIII A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK In trying to understand the present industrial and commercial position of Great Britain, we were bound to give very special attention to the position and resources of our chief rivals, Germany and America. To the philosopher, the economist, and the statesman questions of social progress and well-being form a study of forces. It is the special duty of the statesman, from the study of these forces, to shape the measures which are necessary to promote the interests of the people committed to his charge. But the voters of this country have a respon- sibility which, though diffused over many mil- lions, is, in every view of it, extremely serious. They have to choose the statesmen and the general policy which they judge most worthy. 99 7_2 100 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM If we are to come to a right decision on questions of Fiscal policy, we must especially endeavour to throw off as far as we can the defects of the insular mind. Among the prominent features of the insular mind was a very robust confidence in ourselves, which per- haps did little harm whilst we were beyond dispute the leading industrial nation. Now, when we are merely one of the leading indus- trial nations, the self-confidence which is based on ignorance may be not only hurtful, but fatal. The mood of self-depreciation which has recently become current amongst us in certain quarters is also to be deprecated. Our aim should be to attain to a clear, reasonable, and accurate estimate of our position as com- pared with that of our rivals. I have, in my previous chapters, tried to bring out some of the chief forces which relate to our present industrial and commercial out- look. In so doing I have sought to avoid using mere catch-words, suppositions, and abstractions, and to dwell on the concrete facts of the actual international situation, especially as regards Germany and the United A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK 101 States. We shall now see how far they sug- gest the necessity for tariff reform. From our brief survey, we may perceive how ample has been the justification for the statement fre- quently made by tariff reformers that circum- stances have completely changed since 1846, when the Corn Laws were repealed. At that time Great Britain was the workshop of the world, and it was generally assumed that she would continue to be the workshop of the world. Countries like Germany and America were, as we have seen, still almost entirely agricultural at that date. Free Trade advo- cates of that period too frequently took for granted that they would remain agricultural. Germany, for instance, would send us grain and timber, while it would be a market for our manufactures. All this is changed now. Germany and America compete with us not only in the markets o£ the world, but in our own markets. All the leading countries aspire to have work- shops of their own. The cotton-mills of India, Japan, and China, as well as those of America, are taking the trade from us in the 102 THE FISCAL PROBLEM markets of the East. These facts are for the most part well known, but their real signifi- cance is not so generally understood. Their real significance is now only beginning to unfold itself. They are the beginnings and first symptoms in a mighty change, the exten- sion to all parts of the world of the forces contained in the industrial revolution, with a corresponding alteration in our economic environment. On the other hand, in the development of our colonies there has been a vast change, which is to our advantage, and which we should try to understand in all its surpassing magnitude and significance. When the Corn Laws were repealed the expansion of our colonies had hardly begun. In 1846 Canada had just become a self-governing colony. It was then our only self-governing colony, and its population and trade were insignificant. At the same date the gold-fields of Australia had not been discovered, and we had only a few pastoral settlements there, still insignificant in population, and, except in wool, insignificant also in trade. Neither Victoria nor Queens- A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK 103 land had become a separate colony, being still unconsidered portions of New South Wales. New Zealand had been a British colony only for six years in 184G. In South Africa we had Cape Colony, extensive enough, but with a small population and very little trade. We had just annexed Natal. We need not stop here to contrast what they were then with what they are now, as everyone knows how they have grown. We have mentioned these matters thus briefly, as they serve to show how totally changed the outlook now is com- pared with what it was sixty years ago as regards our colonies. The alteration in the social and political outlook at home, though different in many ways, has the same character of democratic expansion, and is hardly less momentous. Though the Reform Act of 1832 had been the beginning of a great change, the franchise was still a very narrow one in 1846. The working classes were excluded from it, and the middle class was waging a hard struggle for political power with the landed interest. Besides form- ing one branch of the Legislature entirely, the 104 THE FISCAL PROBLEM land-holding class controlled four-fifths of the House of Commons. Even on the eve of his great triumph, Cobden thus wrote in the spring of 1846 : " In fact, there are not a hundred men in the Commons or twenty in the Lords who are at heart anxious for total repeal."* Thus the Corn Laws, which had been enacted by a landed class controlling Parlia- ment in its own selfish interest, were repealed only under the pressure of a powerful and prolonged outside agitation, assisted by a wet autumn and famine in Ireland. It is needless to say that in such a struggle the strongest antagonism of classes and the bitterest feelings were called forth. We now, happily, live under a better state of things. No one would call it perfect or idyllic. Wealth, rank, and social position still wield far too much influence in the House of Commons. But we can at least say that the political forces which formerly had to act outside of Parliament are now represented and heard in the House of Commons. A long course of * " Life," p. 370. A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK 105 concession to popular opinion has greatly moderated the antagonism of classes, if it has not removed it. Both sides in the present Fiscal controversy appeal to the working classes. The decision now rests with the very people who were excluded from the franchise in 1846. If, therefore, formidable rivals have emerged since 1846, we have magnificent compensa- tion in the goodwill and sympathy of our self- governing colonies, which have enormously grown in industrial and commercial impor- tance since that year, and will long continue to grow. We are also a nation less divided and weakened by the antagonism of classes, and so readier to move as an organic whole in the adoption of measures necessary to our well-being than we were in 1846. In many other respects Ave continue to hold a very strong position. We have capital, with business connections established all over the world, and abundant labour, with the skill acquired by long generations of training in our factories, and we have more conciliatory methods of arranging the disputes between 10G THE FISCAL PROBLEM labour and capital than they have in America. Indeed, there is hardly a country in the world where the conditions are so favourable as in ours for the practical solution of the great questions pending between organized labour and organized capital. We retain many of the advantages of our geographical position, though it is evident that the opening of the Suez Canal has restored to Southern and Central Europe not a little of their old favourable position for trade with the East, and the construction of the Bagdad Railway will mean a further tendency in the same direction. Our manufacturing districts in Lancashire, Yorkshire, and on the Clyde have the advantage of near access to the sea, a very important matter in international com- petition. Our enormous shipping is a most impor- tant element in our international strength. London is still the financial centre of the world, a position which gives us obvious advantages in trade. But we labour under many disadvantages, which have grown since 1846. An increasing A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK 107 proportion of our food and raw materials comes from abroad, and very much of it reaches us after a journey of thousands of miles. Of food we need not speak here. It is more urgent that we should realize that we get a growing part of the timber, the wool and hides, iron, copper, and tin, as well as the whole of the cotton used in our industries, from abroad. These facts may seem rather elementary for mention here. Their signifi- cance for the present controversy lies in the fact that we have to compete with a powerful rival, America, which possesses nearly all its food and raw material in vast abundance within its own borders. Few of us, probably, realize that in the early stages of the industrial revolution, when our supremacy was being established, we produced all, or nearly all, our own wheat. The iron and copper and tin ores, the timber, wool, and hides, produced at home formed a far larger proportion of our total consumption than they do now. It could be shown in detail that the proportion is still declining. As regards tin, for example, the production of ores in Corn- 108 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM wall fell from 10,000 tons in 1875 to 5,000 tons in 1900. In 1875 Cornwall produced one- fourth of the tin ore of the world ; in 1900 it produced only one -fifteenth. The statement that industry will now go to the places where the raw material can best be produced requires some qualification. Success in industry, as we have seen, depends on a combination of advantages. No doubt labour and capital can be transferred to the centres where the richest supply of raw materials can be found. But in estimating the probability of such transfers we must have regard also to considerations of motive power, food, and climate, as well as of market facilities for the finished product. Thus in America it is found most profitable to carry the iron ore from the region about Lake Superior, where coal is not found, to Pittsburg, which has the motive power. And manufacturing energy is not likely to be developed in the tropics so successfully as in temperate climates. Yet, other things being equal, or nearly equal, the tendency of industry will be towards the regions with very abundant raw material. This tendency will A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK 109 obviously in the future not be favourable to Great Britain. We are, in fact, in this by no means favour- able position, that we must procure from abroad an increasing proportion of the appli- ances of all our staple industries, and even as regards these supplies we are not so well situated as we once were. The iron ores in Northern Spain, which have been so useful in our steel industries, are being depleted, and we need to have recourse to Southern Spain and even to low-grade ores in Norway. According to Mr. Carnegie, who ought to know, our own iron ores will be exhausted in about twentj^-five years ; hence the impor- tance of foreign supplies. Germany and the United States, according to the same authority, have known iron ores which will probably last for about a century. With regard to the raw cotton, on which Lancashire depends, there can be no doubt that the American crop, which is by no means unlimited, will in the future be more and more needed for consumption in the country where it is grown. As things are drifting at present, 110 THE FISCAL PRO BLFM we are being heavily handicapped in com- petition with America. Of the appliances of industry, coal is our only strong remaining natural asset. We are using it up at an enormous rate at home, and an increasing proportion of it goes abroad every year to assist our present and future competitors. It has not been pleasant lately to read how large quantities of our South Wales coal — so important to our industries and so essential to our navy, and which may there- fore be regarded as our industrial and national life-blood — have been sold to equip the Russian fleet in the war with Japan. Some day we may succeed in harnessing the tides or focus- sing the sun's rays, and so utilizing them as industrial forces. But a wise national industrial policy should not rest on possi- bilities of that nature. We must build on facts that we know. The moral of this chapter seems abundantly clear, that the time has come for us to reconsider our entire industrial and commercial position, and to revise our Fiscal policy. In the midst of much that is grave, and even anxious, we A CHANGE OF OUTLOOK 1 1 1 have one exceptional point of strength, which, moreover, grows stronger from year to year — our colonies, which desire a system of recip- rocal preference with us in trade. As to the principle there should be no manner of doubt. The only question should be how we can meet this wish of theirs. In fact, our economic principles in some of their most important features have become antiquated. They were suited to a state of things which has passed away, to a time when our commercial supremacy was unchal- lenged, when we had no rivals and no very important self-governing colonies. As com- pared with the generation after 1846 we live in a new economic and political environment, and we shall need to adjust ourselves to it. CHAPTER IX DUMPING In this chapter I purpose to discuss the " dumping " question, with special reference to America. When we consider America as a competitor, present and future, of Great Britain, we must remember that the great country beyond the Atlantic has not yet by any means come to the full measure of its strength. Its enormous resources are not yet completely developed. The organization of its industries and commerce is still imperfect, especially as regards external trade. But great advances are being made. For a long time it was lacking in capital, and was obliged to borrow very extensively in this country. Now it has capital available for foreign investment. The scarcity of labour 112 DUMPING 113 has for a still longer period been a dis- advantage. As we have seen, it receives hundreds of thousands of immigrants annually, most of whom go from Eastern and Southern Europe, and are accustomed to low wages and to a low standard of living. For the lower grades of labour they are a most important addition to the economic power of the country. Owing to the scarcity of labour the Americans were specially impelled to cultivate their natural genius for invention, and they are still inventing to a degree unknown in any other country. The genius for organizing business on a colossal scale has also been developed in America to a degree unknown elsewhere. At present the Americans are weak in shipbuilding and as regards their merchant marine. The message to Congress of President Roosevelt in 1903 is only another proof of the deliberate and far-sighted resolu- tion of the American people to have a merchant marine suited to the great industrial and commercial future of the country. With a similar view the building of a navy is being 8 114 THE FISCAL PROBLEM steadily and energetically pursued. After developing and organizing their home markets and their vast railway system, the Americans are preparing to take a fitting place in external trade, and to some extent they have done so. The interest shown by their statesmen in maintaining the " open door " in China is not a passing incident in diplomacy : it is part of a deliberate policy. After the making of the Panama Canal, which is a phase of the same wider outlook in American policy, they will have a far stronger position in international trade and politics. In America, even more than in Europe, trade and politics go together. We may feel assured that they mean business in the recent events, which constitute a new feature in American history. Other defects in the industrial and com- mercial position of America can be remedied by the development of labour and of transport. Many of the centres of production are not situated near the coal and iron mines ; most of them are a considerable distance inland. The transport of heavy commodities is facilitated by 50-ton cars. The richest and largest iron- DUMPING 1 1 5 mines are in the Lake Superior region, where there is no coal for smelting. Very efficient steamers carry huge cargoes over the mag- nificent water system of the Great Lakes to convenient ports, from which the same gigantic cars convey the ores to Pittsburg, with its enormous stores of coal, petroleum, and natural gas. The United States import large quantities of sugar, coffee, tea, wine, of the finer tex- tiles including silks, and of fruits. Many of these are the products of specially trained labour, which she has not yet had time to develop. The labour which every year is arriving from Europe on such a large scale will in time, we may feel sure, supply the deficiency. Some are the products of the tropics. In the regions which look towards the Gulf of Mexico America raises cotton, sugar, rice, and other subtropical produce. For distinctly tropical products she can turn to Central and South America which lie at her very door. Thus America finds, or can grow, within her own borders almost every variety of raw material peculiar to temperate and subtropical 8—2 116 THE FISCAL PROBLEM climates, and she has some of the richest tropical regions close at hand. As a colossal centre of industry and commerce her career is just begun. She has nearly all the advantages with which we won the fore- most place in the industrial revolution ; she has many which we never had, and she possesses this superb combination of advantages on the most stupendous scale. Such is the country to whose dumping we are exposed. If it were the " surplus " of Belgium or Switzerland, or even of France only, which was being sent to our shores, there would be no special reason for reflection. The dumping which we have to contemplate is that of Germany, and particularly of America, with the vast industrial power which it has already attained, and the far vaster which it will attain in the course of time. There is little to be gained by trying to define or discuss dumping in the abstract. We have to study it in a form which is concrete, actual, and most formidable, and for our present purpose two phases of it should be specially considered. One phase of it may DUMPING 117 be taken as systematic and regular. We may regard it as part of the ordinary business policy of an American corporation to produce a surplus for a foreign market. Everyone conversant with business knows that a second 50,000 of an article can be more cheaply produced than the first 50,000. The organiza- tion, the labour, the plant, are in existence. To produce an additional number you have only to add the necessary material and run the machinery for the necessary time. A good price is obtained for the first 50,000 in the protected home market ; you can afford to sell abroad at a very low price and } T et make a larger profit over the whole transaction than if you had contented yourself with the home market. If at the same time you disturb, depress, or even ruin your foreign rivals, that is their concern ; you are only adapting your- self to the conditions of the market, and if you clear out of the way firms which are troublesome competitors — not only in their own, the British market, but in the world market — so much the better. In the second place, the dumping may be 1 1 8 THE FISCAL PROBLEM involuntary and irregular. That is to say, in times of depression and stagnation there may be a pressure or necessity to sell in varying degrees, according to the position of the seller. It may simply be the need to earn dividends, or it may be the most urgent need to earn cash in order to avert ruin. In the latter extreme case the pressure to sell may be irresistible, and the goods are thrown on the foreign market, to go at any price they can bring. Here, again, let us remember that we are not considering an abstraction. We are deal- ing with the depressions and disturbances that have occurred, that do occur, and may be expected to recur in a country like America, with a gigantic industry yielding a gigantic surplus, which will appear in bewildering forms to disturb and depress industries which are vital to the existence and security of our country. Dumping is not by any means a new phenomenon in trade. It is, we believe, as old as commerce itself. The novelty about it for us at present is that we are now being DUMPING 1 1 9 made the victims of it, whereas in our palmier days we exercised it on other countries. The following was written sixty years ago by the celebrated German economist List : " If the English very often find occasion to offer presents to foreign nations, very different are the forms in which this is done ; it is not unfrequently done against their will. Always does it behove foreign nations well to consider whether or not the present should be accepted. Through their position as the manufacturing and commercial monopolists of the world, their manufactories from time to time fall into the state which they call ' glut,' and which arises from what they call ' overtrading.' At such periods everybody throws his stock of goods into the steamers. After the lapse of eight days the goods are offered for sale in Hamburg, Berlin, or Frankfort, and, after three weeks, in New York, at 50 per cent, under their real value. The English manufacturers suffer for the moment, but they are saved, and they compensate themselves later on by better prices. The German and American manu- facturers receive the blows which were de- 120 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM served by the English : they are ruined. The English nation merely sees the fire and hears the report of the explosion ; the fragments fall down in other countries, and if their inhabitants complain of bloody heads, the intermediate merchants and dealers say, ' The crisis has done it all !' If we consider how often by such crises the whole manufacturing power, the system of credit — nay, the agriculture, and generally the whole economical system — of the nations who are placed in free competition with England are shaken to their foundations, and that these nations have afterwards, not- withstanding, richly to recompense the English manufacturers by higher prices, ought we not, then, to become very sceptical as to the propriety of the commercial conditions of nations being- regulated according to the mere Co o theory of values and according to cosmopolitical principles ? The prevailing economical school has never deemed it expedient to elucidate the causes and effects of such commercial crises."* * " National System of Political Economy," trans- lated by Sampson S. Lloyd, p. 147. DUMPING 1 2 1 So wrote List of English dumping sixty years ago. List may be taken as the representative economist of Germany and the father of the present protective system. His words have no ordinary significance, therefore, as illus- trating the feelings of the more thoughtful of his countrymen towards English dumping. In his speech in the Reichstag on May 2, 1879, Bismarck complained that Germany, by reason of her low tariff, had been the dumping-ground of foreign overproduction. And here is what Mr. Carnegie* wrote about dumping recently : " At first European makers could ' dump their surplus' upon the market and force American makers to accept for their entire output the extreme low rates which had only to be taken by the invader for a small part of his. The party in control of a profitable home market can most successfully invade the foreign markets. In recent years it is the American manufacturer who is ' dumping his surplus ' in foreign territory. First conquer your home market and the foreign market will probably * Carnegie, " Empire of Business," p. 230. 122 THE FISCAL PROBLEM be added to you, is the rule with manufactures in international trade." With regard to the dumping question, it is essential to understand how important a part fixed and permanent charges now play in most large business organizations. A vast capital is invested in a gigantic plant, which must be of the most recent type. As inven- tion is always at work, this plant is being continually displaced by newer forms. This large and costly plant has therefore in general only a short life, and to be profitable its life must of necessity be a full and active one. If the business organization be a steel corporation, it will own its own coal-fields and iron-mines, railways and steamers. This means an enormous capital, on which dividends must, if possible, be earned. Slackness of work may therefore involve a dead loss on an enormous scale. We need not wonder, then, that in the evidence quoted in the Fiscal Blue- Book from the report of the U.S.A. Industrial Commission considerable emphasis is laid on the point of keeping the mills running " steadily and full." DUMPING 123 When the home demand is very active, there is little or no need for recourse to foreign exportation ; but when demand slackens at home, they naturally turn to the foreign markets. In times of depression and stagnation, such as Germany has recently experienced, it is an immense advantage to have open markets like ours, where they can dispose of stocks that are lying heavily on the hands of the manufacturers. If depression results in bankruptcies, the dumping naturally becomes still more importunate. In any case, it is a great relief to have a free market like ours on which to dump the glut of goods. Germany has recovered from her late depres- sion with surprising quickness. The open markets of Great Britain and of the British Empire must undoubtedly have helped in this process of recovery. Of course, particular trades in this country benefit by these sales at very low prices. As we said in a previous chapter, our confectioners have profited by the low price of bounty-fed sugar, and our shipbuilders are the better for dumped steel-plates. In general, the makers 124 THE FISCAL PROBLEM of the finished article will benefit by the cheapening of their raw material. But if the dumping becomes general and long-continued, the results may be very unpleasant, even for the trades that profit by it for a time. There is every prospect that it will be general and long -continued, but obviously varying inversely with the state of trade in the home market of the country carrying it on — i.e., lessening in times of prosperity and increasing in times of depres- sion. As business is conducted on such a colossal and ever-growing scale in America, the surplus of such an industry thus dumped on our shores may very probably be quite sufficient to disturb and depress our staple trades along the whole line to a degree which no lover of his country can contemplate with equanimity. For example, if our shipbuilders got into the habit of depending on dumped steel -plates from America or Germany, they would soon find themselves at the mercy of the trusts and syndicates of those countries, and our shipbuilding trade would be in the position of a house with a fine superstruc- DUMPING 1 2 5 ture from which the foundation had been removed. The energy and ambition of the American men of business are only equalled by their confidence in the future of their country. Here is a quotation from the evidence of Mr. Guthrie, president of one of the com- panies now merged in the United States Steel Corporation, as given in the report already referred to : ° The truth of the matter is, the Creator of all things has been good to us. We have the raw material, the coal, the coke, the ability, the intelligence, and we are pushing it for all it is worth ; and I think it is only a question of time — and a very short time — when we shall control the iron and steel markets of the world." If the reader is not duly impressed by the spread-eagle style of the above quotation, he may be invited to ponder the following reasoned statement of Mr. Carnegie, which goes to the root of the matter and reveals the causes of American success : " Various contributory causes have made steel billets at fifteen dollars a ton possible, among which automatic machinery ranks first, 126 THE FISCAL PROBLEM and in this the American excels. Continuous processes come second. Workshops 1,100 and 1,200 feet long are becoming common, in which the raw material enters at one end and emerges finished at the other without hand- ling, and often without ever stopping, except for reheating. The writer hears of plans to-day for new works upon such a scale that a mile and a quarter of land is required, one shop alone being 3,000 feet in length. One essential for cheap production is magnitude. Concerns making one thousand tons of steel per day have little chance against one making ten. We see this law in all departments of industry. It evolves the 20,000-ton steamship and the 50-ton railroad car. Improved engines and the use of electricity as a motor, the new loading and unloading machinery, are all con- tributory causes to the cheapening of steel."* The following passage will show that Mr. Carnegie is quite as confident of the triumph of American steel in the not distant future as Mr. Guthrie was. Making some allowance, perhaps, for the tone of elation in * Carnegie, " Empire of Business," p. 233. DUMPING 127 which it is expressed, we must admit that the anticipation seems to be perfectly justified. " The influence of our steel-making capacity upon development at home must be marvel- lous, for the nation that makes the cheapest steel has the other nations at its feet so far as manufacturing in most of its branches is concerned. The cheapest steel means the cheapest ships, the cheapest machinery, the cheapest thousand and one articles of which steel is the base. We are on the eve of a development of the manufacturing powers of the Republic such as the world has never seen. " The Republic's progress and commanding position as a steel-producer are told in a few words : In 1873, only twenty-seven years ago, the United States produced 198,796 tons of steel, and Great Britain, her chief com- petitor, 653,500 tons — more than three times as much. Twenty-six years later, in 1899, the Republic made more than twice as much as the Monarchy, the figures being 10,639,857 and 5,000,000 tons respectively — an eight- fold increase for Great Britain and fifty-three- 128 THE FISCAL PROBLEM fold for the Republic ; and it made almost 40 per cent, of all the steel made in the world, which was 27,000,000 tons. Industrial history has nothing to show comparable to this. " So much for the past. As for the future, ere the present century runs one-third its course, perchance only one-fourth, the United States is to make more steel than all the rest of the world combined, and supply the wants of many lands besides our own."* In connection with the Fiscal question, it will be necessary to say something about trusts ; but we shall try to avoid the contro- versial aspects of the subject, except so far as is necessary towards the clearing up of the proper theme of this book. Trusts and syndicates are simply recent phases of the growth and consolidation of capital. This process of growth and consolidation has been proceeding ever since the beginning of the industrial revolution. The novel point about the trusts is that they have attained to a monopoly in so many of the chief articles of * Carnegie, " Empire of Business," p. 241. DUMPING 129 consumption. And even this is hardly novel, as simple firms, as well as companies, have sometimes gained a monopoly in important articles of consumption. In fact, trusts and syndicates are only carrying to a further stage of development tendencies which have been in action for generations ; for it must be understood that it is the aim of business men, not to illustrate the beauties of free competition, which are often ruinous, but to make the greatest possible profit. This they can best obtain, as they believe, by a well-devised monopoly, which, moreover, gives them security against the risks of a competition that is often fatal. Mr. Carnegie, for example, tells us that ninety- five out of a hundred who start business on their own account in America become bankrupt. There is indeed, hardly a firm or company which at one period or another has not been on the brink of ruin. Trusts, then, are largely due to the natural desire to make profits and to avert risk of ruin by the limitation of competition. But this is not the whole account of the matter. 9 130 THE FISCAL PROBLEM Connected with or included in the desire to make profits is the very legitimate wish to secure greater efficiency and economy by operating on a larger scale. This is done by means which are too well known to require statement here — such as lessening of office expenses and expenses of plant by closing superfluous offices and plants, saving of expense on advertising and travellers, etc. Exceptional skill and energy are required for the control of such a gigantic establish- ment as thus grows up, and success is not always gained at the first trial. But we must remember that in America greater energy and brain are put into business than in any other leading country. The opportunities are colossal ; the rewards of success are on a corresponding scale ; and the competing interests of art, literature, and science, of politics and society, are not yet so attractive as in other countries. The success- ful founder or manager of a great trust must be an exceptional man. In fact, it is an important feature of the trusts that they give scope for and stimulus to the energy, DUMPING 1 3 1 ambition, and capacity of the ablest men in America. Thus we have a gigantic business organiza- tion, in which the division of labour and specialization of skill are carried to the highest pitch and on the widest scale, under the control of the ablest men. From the point of view of the national well-beino-, such organizations have serious defects, as well as merits. They are the product of mixed forces and motives. But we are not discussing the general problem at present ; we are considering the relation of trusts to the question of dumping. Have trusts come to stay ? We believe that they have come to stay, like other human institutions, for a time — that is to say, till something more suitable rises up to take their place. How long it will be no mortal man can tell. But this question also is hardly relevant to our present inquiry. The problem of trusts is relevant to the present inquiry, inasmuch as they form an essential and dominating and growing factor in the business of the world as at present conducted. For, after all, " trust " is only the 9—2 132 THE FISCAL PROBLEM popular name for a business organization, differing from other business organizations chiefly by reason of its gigantic size and its tendency to monopoly, gained through the fusion and amalgamation of competing interests. In America they prefer to call them corporations. But whatever their name be, we believe that they will in the near future go on extending and consolidating, till they control the trade, not of a country only, but will have a widening international influence. Such a tendency is already in action. It is certain that the process of growth and consolidation of capital will continue in various forms. Whether we call it a trust, a syndicate, a corporation, or simply a company, the form it takes will be large. The name is a matter of indifference ; the question whether they can retain a monopoly is serious, but even that is not vital with regard to dumping. The vital point is that the forms taken by capital in America will be vast, producing a large surplus for export to this country. We are here concerned, therefore, not with speculative matters, as to the future power of DUMPING 133 trusts and syndicates to survive and retain a monopoly. We must deal with the situation as we find it. Trusts and syndicates exist and are growing. We must face the facts, forces, and tendencies of the actual inter- national position. The great organizations at present, then, are trusts and syndicates. But the vital point for the present question is, not that they are trusts and syndicates — the vital point is that they are gigantic and are likely to produce a large surplus, through which they will continue to depress and disturb our trade. Let us recollect that the Americans have a protected home market of 80,000,000, that our own market of 42,000,000 is at present as free to them as it is to us, and that the entire British Empire, with the exception of such colonies as have given us a preference, is equally open to them. In these circumstances the American industrial chiefs can go on extending and consolidating their businesses with a confidence which we cannot feel. In economic history it is a well-known fact that a period of booming prosperity usually leads 134 THE FISCAL PROBLEM to a large increase of productive power in putting up larger plant, etc., and that a period of depression usually results in a permanent fall of prices. We must in America expect to see a great increase of productive power and falling prices. The Americans can produce coal more cheaply than we can. They maintain that they can produce iron and steel more cheaply than we can. Except in clothing and house rent, American workmen can live as cheaply as ours, and they spend more on these impor- tant departments both because they have more money to spend and have a higher standard of living than our workmen. This means that wages are higher in America, but that fact is more than counterbalanced by its greater efficiency through the larger use of labour- saving machinery. Such are the conclusions one must draw from a very careful examina- tion of the evidence in the Fiscal Blue-Book. As the latest example of American indus- trial organization which has come to the notice of the present writer, the following may be interesting : DUMPING 135 " Co-operation among the Labour Com- missioners of some of the principal grain- growing States of America bids fair to prove of great value to farmers and labourers alike. The States included are Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota, and Minnesota, in which great inconvenience and loss have been caused in the past by short- ness of labour for the ingathering of the immense crops of corn produced, although there have been usually plenty of unemployed men in the cities, who only needed facilities of transportation and an assurance of prolonged employment to induce them to go out as harvesters. Fortunately, the harvesting in the several States named does not take place at the same time. Beginning in Oklahoma, it occurs next in Kansas and Missouri, follow- ing later towards the north in Iowa and Nebraska, and later still in South Dakota and Minnesota. The Labour Commissioners, who expect to obtain cheap tickets for the men for railway journeys, propose to despatch about 45,000 men to help in the earliest harvesting, and then to pass them on to the later districts 136 THE FISCAL PROBLEM as soon as they have finished their first contracts. By this arrangement, if it works well, about half the number of extra hands who would be needed if each man went to only one State will suffice to meet the demand. Farmers, it is expected, will be saved from the need of offering excessively high wages for extra hands, while the men will be benefited by the prolongation of employment at the ordinary but still high wages paid in harvest."* If my readers will be good enough to read the article "Agriculture" in the first of the new volumes of the "Encyclopaedia Britannica," they will see how agriculture generally is organized in America. In view of all these facts and forces, which are not only permanent, but of growing magni- tude, I cannot see how our staple industries can resist the process of dumping if it is permitted to go on. It seems to me that we have no choice in the matter, but must undertake a thorough reform of our Fiscal system. * The Standard, June 10, 1904. CHAPTER X SIFTED STATISTICS (The following statistics are based chiefly on the Fiscal Blue-Book, which is briefly referred to as F. B.-B.) In this chapter I propose to point out some of the leading conclusions regarding our chief industries, which may be fairly drawn from an examination of statistics. First let us take agriculture. The acreage under wheat in the United Kingdom diminished from 3,514,088 in 1875 to 1,456,042 in 1895, rising to 1,901,014 in 1900. The estimated produce in bushels, which had been 75,994,000 in 1890, was only 38,285,000 in 1895, and 54,322,000 in 1900. The number of people occupied in agriculture in England and Wales decreased from 1,904,687 in 1851 to 1,423,854 137 138 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM in 1871, and to 988,340 in 1901. Thus, when we apply the three great tests of acreage under wheat, of produce in wheat, and of number of people employed, we are able to realize how very serious has been the decline in agri- culture. Let us complete this brief summary by stating some facts as to the movement of prices. In 1875 the annual average price per imperial quarter was 45s. 2d. It was 56s. 9d. in 1877, the last year that it rose above 50s. In 1883 it was 41s. 7d., and the annual average has never since risen above 40s. ; since 1892 it has only twice exceeded 30s. The lowest annual average, 22s. 10d., was in 1894, in which year the weekly average sank to 17s. 6d., the lowest on record, and the monthly average price for October was only 17s. 8d. It is a reasonable estimate that the capital value of agricultural land diminished by about £900,000,000 between 1875 and 1900, and the spendable income derived yearly from the land decreased by about £50,000,000 in the same period. In considering the position of our manu- SIFTED STATISTICS 139 facturing industries we should bear in mind the following points : 1. That prices and values tend to go down. 2. That machinery and processes tend to improve, so that less labour is required in proportion to output. 3. That less labour of women and children in proportion to grown - up males is em- ployed. 4. That population has increased, leading to a widening home market, but also to a greater need and capacity for employment. Let us now take the cotton trade from 1890, and apply to it the three tests of value of exports, volume of entire trade, as shown by quantity of raw cotton consumed, and the number of people occupied in the industry. Value of Exports from United Kingdom. 1890. 1893. 1896. Yarn Manufactures £ £ 12,341,000 ! 9,056,000 62,090,000 54,699,000 £ 10,043,000 59,310,000 74,431,000 ! 63,755,000 i 69,353,000 140 THE FISCAL PROBLEM 1899. 1902. Yarn Manufactures ... £ 8,059,000 59,490,000 £ 7,404,000 65,054,000 67,549,000 72,458,000* The estimated consumption of raw cotton in the United Kingdom for the same period was for each year as follows : Million Cwts. 1890 14-8 1891 .. 14-9 1892 .. 13-6 1893 .. 13-2 1894 .. 14-4 1895 .. 14-6 1896 .. 14-7 1897 .. 14-5 1898 .. 15-5 1899 .. 15-7 1900 .. 14-5 1901 ... 14-7 1902 .. 14-61 The number of people employed in the industry in England and Wales decreased * F. B.-B., pp. 34, 35. t Ibid., p. 367. SIFTED STATISTICS 141 from 605,755 in 1891 to 582,119 in 1901.* Under the three tests, therefore, the infer- ence we must draw is the same — that the cotton industry has been slowing down into the stationary stage. There are two im- portant facts, however, which should not be overlooked. The quality of the cotton we consume is increasingly a finer one in pro- portion as our cotton trade tends more and more to produce the finer counts of yarn. Also, fewer children and women are now employed in the trade in proportion to adult males. The fair conclusion is, then, that we are holding our own, but that there is no expansion manifest. In other words, we have on the whole a stationary industry, and, as the estimated consumption of raw cotton would indicate, with comparatively moderate fluctua- tions. In view of the increase in population (amounting to nearly 4,000,000) from 1891 to 1901, we are the more bound to accept this conclusion. As to the woollen industry, on applying * F. B.-B., p. 363. 142 THE FISCAL PROBLEM the same tests we find that the value of exports is as follows : 1890. 1893. 1896. Woollen and worsted yarn Woollen and worsted manu- factures £ 4,086,000 20,419,000 £ 4,532,000 16,404,000 £ 5,655,000 18,269,000 24,505,000 20,936,000 23,924,000 1899. 1902. Woollen and worsted yarn Woollen and worsted manufactures £ 4,875,000 14,789,000 £ 3,530,000 15,264,000 19,664,000 18,794,000* The estimated consumption of wool for the period from 1890 to 1902 was as follows : 1890 1891 1892 1893 Million Lbs. 428 487 467 485 F. B.-B., pp. 36, 37. SIFTED STATISTICS 143 Million Lbs. 1894 ... 507 1895 ... 510 1896 ... 520 1897 ... 495 1898 ... 568 1899 ... 523 1900 .. 502 1901 ... 541 1902 ... 494* From the above list it will be seen that there have been considerable fluctuations in the quantities of wool consumed in the period 1890 to 1902. It should be stated also that in 1889 the amount was 470,000,000 pounds ; but that was a record year, far surpassing previous ones. The conclusion is that since 1889 there has been on the whole a lack of vigorous expansion in our woollen and worsted trade. This conclusion is fully confirmed by the fact that the number of persons employed in it in England and Wales decreased from 258,356 in 1891 to 236,106 in 1901. f Over against this fact that fewer persons are employed we must place the other facts, that processes * F. B.-B., p. 368. f Ibid., p. 364. 144 THE FISCAL PROBLEM and machinery tend to improve, and that less labour of juveniles is employed in proportion to adults. All these considerations, when taken along with the marked decline in the value of exports, point the same way. On the whole, we must come to the conclusion that our woollen and worsted trade has a tendency to be stationary. The total number of persons employed in the lace trade in England and Wales decreased from 61,726 in 1851 to 49,370 in 1871, and 36,439 in 1901. The total number employed in the linen trade in England and Wales decreased from 27,421 in 1851 to 18,680 in 1871, and 4,956 in 1901. In the silk trade there was a decline in the number employed from 130,723 in 1851 to 82,963 in 1871, and 39,035 in 1901.* With regard to the linen trade, we should, however, remember that Ireland is the seat of the industry, and that linen has to a large degree been going out of fashion, in favour of woollen goods, and especially of the finer * F. B.-B., pp. 363, 361 SIFTED STATISTICS 145 cotton goods that can more cheaply be made to serve the same purpose. Compared with other countries, Ireland is holding its own in the linen trade fairly well. In silk our climate and the taste and aptitudes of the people do not very well fit us to compete against coun- tries like France, where the raw material is produced and the people have special aptitudes, produced by generations of training in a finer climate. No real significance can therefore be fairly found in the decline of the linen and silk industries. We now pass from the textiles to the iron and steel trade. A review of the various departments of its export business, except machinery and millwork, show symptoms of stagnation in the period from 1890. Hard- ware and cutlery, with many fluctuations, declined from£2,764,000 in 1890 to£2,178,000 in 1902. Implements and tools experienced a slight improvement from £1,338,000 to £1,573,000 during the same time. Tin-plates, severely injured by American tariffs, as we all know, declined greatly for some years after 1891. The trade began to revive in 1899, 10 146 THE FISCAL PROBLEM and in 1902 its value was about two-thirds of what it had been in 1890. The figures are: 1890. 1891. 1898. 1902. £ 6,362,000 £ 7,166,000 £ 2,744,000* £ 4,333,000 As regards other iron and steel exports, we give the figures for some notable years : 1890. 1894. 1896. £ 24,702,000 £ 14,128,000 £ 20,426,000 1900. 1901. 1902. £ 27,646,000 £ 21,304,000 £ 24,545,0001 The number of persons employed in the iron and steel trades (including dealers) increased from 200,627 in 1881 to 202,406 in 1891, and 216,022 in 1901. Here is a table J giving production and consumption of pig-iron from 1881 to 1902 : * Lowest. t F. B.-B., pp. 34-37. X Ibid., p. 369. SIFTED STATISTICS 147 Year. Production of Pig-iron. Consumptioi i of Pig-iron. Total Per Total Per Million Head Million Head Tons. Cwts. Tons. Cwts. 1881 81 4-6 6-7 3-8 1882 8-6 4-8 6-9 3-9 1883 8-5 4-8 7-0 4-0 1884 7-8 44 66 37 1885 74 4-2 6-5 3-6 1886 7-0 3-8 6-0 3-3 1887 7-6 4-2 6-5 3-6 1888 8-0 44 7-0 3-8 1889 8-3 44 7-2 3-9 1890 7-9 4-2 6-8 36 1891 74 4-0 6-6 3-5 1892 6-7 3-6 6-0 34 1893 7-0 3-6 6-2 3-2 1894 74 3-8 6-6 34 1895 7-7 4-0 6-9 3-5 1896 8-7 44 7-8 3-9 1897 8-8 44 7-8 3-9 1898 8-6 4-2 7-7 3-8 1899 94 4-6 8-2 40 1900 9-0 44 7-7 3-7 1901 7-9 3-8 7-3 3-5 1902 8-7 4-1 7-8 3-7 The above table unmistakably points to the conclusion that the iron and steel trade, like the cotton and woollen industries, is on the whole stationary. There are considerable fluctuations, but no vigorous expansion ; in- 10—2 148 THE FISCAL PROBLEM deed, there is no marked and sustained expan- sion of any kind. The consumption of pig-iron per head of population has been stationary since 1881. The whole consumption was stationary from 1881 to 1894; in 1895 and 1896 it increased, only to become stationary again. There has been a great increase in our exports of machinery and millwork. In 1850 its value was only £1,042,000 ; in 1860 it had risen to £3,838,000, and in the record year of 1873 to £10,020,000. After many fluctuations, it rose in 1890 to £16,411,000. In 1900 it was £19,620,000, and in 1902 £18,755,000.* But from the point of view of British trade and its future prosperity, our gratification at these figures must be qualified by the consideration that this export goes to equip our rivals, and so to enable them to compete against us. The boot and shoe trade now shows very much the same stationary character. After being menaced by American machine-made wares it seems to be holding its own. * P. B.-B., p. 97. SIFTED STATISTICS 149 When we pass to coal, we meet a very different state o£ things. Everyone knows that the coal trade has increased greatly in the amount and value of its output, and in the number of persons employed ; but the bearing of this increase on the economic future of the country raises the most serious reflections. It is one of the largest natural assets of the country — for purely industrial purposes, un- doubtedly the very largest ; and it is being diminished at a rapidly increasing rate. It is certain also that long before we reach the period of exhaustion of our coalfields, it will cease to be economical to work them. If we go beyond these points, we enter the region of speculation. As scientific discovery and invention advance coal may lose its special value as an instrument of industry, and it may prove that we have done well to dispose of it so rapidly. But this is speculation or con- jecture. In tailoring we find a large increase as regards the number of persons employed,* and this is a pleasant feature so far as it points to * F. B.-B., p. 365. 150 THE FISCAL PROBLEM an expanding trade, and a rise in the standard of comfort at home. But we cannot shut our eyes to the fact that it employs a low-grade labour, largely supplied by aliens of a not very desirable class. Building* shows a remarkable increase in the number of persons employed, as does also printing and bookbinding, f In building nearly as many are employed as in agricul- ture, and more than we find occupied in all the great textile industries combined. But the prosperity of the building and print- ing trades must be taken as a result and symptom of the general prosperity of the country, rather than as a cause of it. They may be said to represent the superstructure rather than the foundation of national well- being. Of all the trades in the country we can contemplate with most satisfaction shipping and ship-building. With many and great fluctuations, the latter shows vigorous progress. Here is the record of ship- building for the ten years from 1893 to 1902 : * F. B.-B., p. 363. t Ibid., p. 365. SIFTED STATISTICS 151 1893. 1894. 1895. 1896. 1897. Tons. 584,674 Tons. 669,492 Tons. 647,634 Tons. 736,814 Tons. 644,697 1898. 1899. 1900. 1901. 1902. Tons. 870,608 Tons. 949,010 Tons. 944,267 Tons. 983,133 Tons. 950,425 Recently we have been building a tonnage equal to about ten times that of either France or Germany. As regards shipping, we advanced from 2,768,262 tons in 1840 to 5,690,789 tons in 1870, and to 10,054,770 tons in 1902. We now possess about five times the tonnage of Germany, about ten times that of France, and eleven times the tonnage of the United States registered for oversea traffic. Our shipping, therefore, holds a magnificent position, which may satisfy the most ardent patriot. It is certainly worthy of an industry which is in entire harmony with the needs, the history, and the traditions of the country.* * F. B.-B-, pp. 376-379. 152 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM Our general conclusion must, therefore, be that some of our industries — such as lace, linen, and silk — have decayed. But no special significance with regard to our industrial and commercial position may be attributed to this fact. Of much graver significance is the fact that the great cotton, woollen, and iron and steel industries are showing since 1890 very plain indications that they have been slowing down into the stationary condition. Table VI., pp. 25-27 of the Fiscal Blue-Book, giving quantities exported, clearly confirms this view. Coal-mining and machinery and millwork make progress, but the questionable features attendant on it prevent us from drawing any pleasant conclusions regarding our industrial and commercial future. The progress of the building and printing trades is a satisfactory symptom of national well-being in the past, but they afford no guarantee of the continuance of our prosperity. They are the result, rather than a cause, of our prosperity. SIFTED STATISTICS 153 In ship-building and shipping we see the most gratifying evidence of a healthy and vigorous progress on the old national lines. But even in ship-building the chairmen of leading companies, such as Armstrong and Palmers, testify to the increasing severity of competition. If we look at the general course of our trade, the conclusion we must form is the same. Since the early seventies there has been no increase in the value of our exports of manufactured goods. There has been an increase in volume, but, owing to the fall of prices, no rise in the general value of these exports. Whilst there have been considerable fluctuations since 1890, we may in all fairness conclude that there has been no perceptible increase either in general value or volume. We give the figures for some of the most notable years since 1890 of our total export of manufactures (except ships) : 1890. 1894. 1897. 1899. £ 228,800,000 £ £ 183,500,000 200,900,000 £ 213,500,000 154 THE FISCAL PROBLEM 1900. 1901. 1902. £ 225,200,000 £ 221,000,000 £ 227,600,000* It may be added that a glance at the frontis- piece of the Fiscal Blue- Book will show how far prices have fluctuated during the period 1890 to 1902. Volumes, of course, have fluc- tuated as well. Here is a table with some highly significant figures : Impokts into the United Kingdom of Manu- factured and Partly Manufactured Articles. 1879. 1880. 1890. 1902. £ 70,400,000 £ 83,200,000 £ 98,200,000 £ 148,900,000! Our total imports of manufactured articles rose from £52,881,468 in 1883 to £63,218,167 in 1890, and to £93,275,005 in 1900.J It will be observed how remarkable has been the increase in these imports since 1890. * F. B.-B., p. 22. + Ibid., pp. 5, 6. X Sir A. E. Bateman's Memorandum, p. 50. SIFTED STATISTICS 155 An explanation of this increase will be found on pp. 72 and 73 of the Fiscal Blue-Book. As is well known, a great part of our trade with Holland and Belgium is really in German goods, which come to us through Rotterdam and Antwerp. Our trade with Germany, Holland, and Belgium, must for statistical purposes be treated as one. Our imports of manufactured and partly manufactured goods from Germany increased from £9,447,584 in 1890 to £16,057,099 in 1902 ; from Holland they increased from £15,447,380 in 1890 to £19,785,587 in 1902 ; from Belgium from £12,680,772 in 1890 to £20,684,353 in 1902. Our imports from the three countries, there- fore, increased from about £37,500,000 in 1890 to £56,500,000 in 1902, a total increase of £19,000,000. Of the same class of imports from France there was an increase from £25,848,006 in 1890 to £31,071,418 in 1902; from the United States from £10,279,669 in 1890 to £20,930,627 in 1902. Let us now compare with these statistics the figures of our exports of manufactured or 156 THE FISCAL PROBLEM partly manufactured articles to the same countries for the corresponding years :* 1890. 1902. To Germany To Belgium To Holland To France ... To United States ... £ 15,950,000 6,766,000 9,392,000 12,537,000 29,089,000 £ 16,442,000 7,061,000 6,829,000 10,250,000 19,468,000 73,734,000 60,050,000 Here we have a decline in round numbers of £13,500,000 in these exports to the leading industrial and commercial nations. From the same pages we take the following figures regarding the same class of exports : 1890. 1902. £ £ To British India ... 32,089,000 30,873,000 To self - governing colonies ... 35,516,000 52,211,000 To other British colonies and pos- sessions 11,549,000 12,875,000 79,154,000 95,959,000 F. B.-B., pp. 32, 33. SIFTED STATISTICS 157 This is an increase of nearly £10,000,000. Yet is it not correct to say that but for our colonies there would be a substantial decline in our entire export of manufactured and partly manufactured products. From 1890 to 1902 there was a decrease from £149,651,000 to £131,686,000 in these exports to foreign countries.* But our trade with our colonies shows no evident expansion except during the South African War. The Imperial market is also is being invaded by our rivals, as set out in the following table, showing the average annual proportion of imports received by India and our leading colonies :f United Kingdom : In 1893-1895. In 1898-1900. British India ... Australasia Natal Cape Canada 73 41 72 81 35 64 38 67 68 25 * F. B.-B., pp. 32, 33. t Sir A. E. Bateuian's Memorandum, p. 20. 158 THE FISCAL PROBLEM Proportion from Ger- Proportion from United many : States : In 1893- In 1898- In 1893- In 1898- 1895. 1900. 1895. 1900. British India 2-0 2-2 1-8 1-5 Australasia 1-7 3-2 3-1 6-9 Natal 2-2 31 4-8 9 Cape 3-5 37 4-5 10-9 Canada 3 9 4.4 45-9 59-3 The plain conclusion to be drawn from statistics is just what we all knew in a more or less vague way, and, indeed, what we might under the circumstances naturally expect : that our rivals are invading our home markets, the Imperial markets, and all the markets of the world. This process is well summed up in the following table, showing the increase of total exports of manufactured goods from France, Germany, and the United States :* Years. France. Germany. United States. Million £. Million £. Million £. 1880 74 83 21 1890 80 107 31 1895 76 109 38 1900 90 149 90 Sir A. E. Bateman's Memorandum, p. 17. SIFTED STATISTICS 159 As regards the United States, it will be said that a very large portion of these exports are farm and mineral products, which have passed through only the primary stages of manu- facture. That is true, but a growing pro- portion of them also belongs to the most highly finished stages of manufacture, such as agri- cultural implements and machinery, sewing- machines, typewriters, machine tools, electrical appliances, etc. It is also said that the industrial progress of our rivals is due to natural and inevitable causes, which we can do nothing to prevent. This is to a very large degree true. Whatever we might have done, there would have been a large increase in the German and American output of coal, pig-iron, and steel. In all these departments the Americans have far out- stripped us. The Germans are overtaking, or already have overtaken, us in the output of iron ore, pig-iron, and steel. In so far as these things are inevitable, they must be accepted ; but the fact of their being thus inevitable makes it all the more a mighty change in our economic environment, which 160 THE FISCAL PROBLEM we must seriously consider. The main lesson of statistics, therefore, is that since 1875 there has been in our economic environment a great change, which has begun to show its natural effects more clearly since 1890, these dates being taken roughly as the landmarks of the process. To prevent misconception, I wish to add that no suggestion is made that the country has ceased to be prosperous. During the whole course of the industrial revolution there has been a displacement of labour and industry. That displacement still continues. Besides such features of it as have already been indicated in this chapter, we may speci- ally mention the great increase in services required by the growth of railways, by the vast growth of municipal activity since 1835, and by the growth of the postal and telegraph and other departments of the State. These are all symptoms of advance in a well-ordered and well-equipped community, as is also the notable increase in the numbers of the teach- ing and medical professions. All these, and others we need not specify, afford employment SIFTED STATISTICS 161 in meeting the higher needs of civilization, and mark a vast improvement in our internal condition. With regard to external relations, the services we render by our enormous shipping, as also in insurance and finance, etc., taken along with the interest from our investments abroad, fully account for the difference between our exports and imports. On this question a good deal of needless discussion has taken place. But the very grave fact remains that, following on the serious decline of agricul- ture, our great staple industries in cottons, woollens, iron and steel show plain symptoms of slowing down into the stationary stage. And the causes of this are not less plain. Our trade is hampered or prohibited by the fiscal barriers which so many nations have raised against us, whilst in our own markets, in the imperial markets, and in the world market we are exposed to dumping. In our trade statistics we can undoubtedly see the effects of the forces involved in dumping, which, moreover, have not yet come into anything like full operation. 11 CHAPTER XI TARIFF REFORM AND INDUSTRIAL PROGRESS The study of economic forces and the study of statistics which we have made in preceding chapters appear to lead to the same conclu- sion. Our staple industries are not secure against the process of dumping carried on by such formidable competitors as Germany and the United States. The most ardent and convinced Free Traders will admit that we are bound to exercise the elementary right of self-defence against such competition when it begins to threaten industries which are neces- sary to the well-being of the country and to its security as a leading Power. While it may or may not be desirable that we should pursue a system of reciprocal preferential tariffs with our colonies, it is absolutely 162 TARIFF REFORM 163 necessary to safeguard our staple industries against unfair competition. The latter point is evidently the more urgent, for we may exercise our choice regarding our relations with the colonies ; but if we are to remain a great Power, we must maintain our staple industries. The latter point is therefore the pivot of the whole question. But if we start from this point, all the rest naturally follows. It means in the first place a radical change in the attitude of the manu- facturing classes towards tariff questions. In 1846 the manufacturing classes carried Free Trade ; we may expect that they will now decide the movement towards a modification of that policy. The new policy can be carried only by a combination of the manu- facturing and farming interests, and the two interests will again find themselves in harmony, after a divergence which has con- tinued for more than sixty years. If the farmers may require to pay more for their agricultural implements and other necessaries in order to prevent dumping, they have a claim for favourable consideration which their 11—2 164 THE FISCAL PROBLEM new allies, the manufacturers, cannot resist. This will lead probably, among other things, to a moderate tariff on food, which, again, involves preference with the colonies. In two very important aspects of the whole question the manufacturers will gain materi- ally : they will be safeguarded against dump- ing, and they will obtain in the colonies a preferential market for their goods. It is reasonable to maintain, is it not, that the landed interest has a right to corresponding advantages ? The people who live on the land will have to consider and decide what these advantages should be. But before such advantages can be conceded to agriculture, the people of this country generally will have the right to insist that our land system and our agricultural methods be placed on an enlight- ened and progressive basis. For my part, I think it is premature to go into details at all precisely. We have all learned a good deal since the Fiscal contro- versy began, and I believe we shall have to go on learning for a considerable time before we arrive at anything like a fixed tariff TAEIFF REFORM 165 policy. The details of our Fiscal policy may, probably enough, be a matter of debate for generations to come. Regarding the general direction, however, in which we shall need to move, we must decide before it is too late. In defining the general principles which should guide our tariff policy, let it be clearly understood that it is under the condi- tions which now prevail, or tend to prevail, we consider it necessary to have recourse to protective measures. So far and so long as the conditions leading to dumping may continue, so far and so long must we protect our staple industries. The measures we adopt may be more or less temporary. Their extent and continuance will depend on the necessities of the situation that call them forth. It is a secondary question whether we use the word " Protection " to describe these measures, but it is important that we should discard misleading associations connected with the history of the word. The old Protective system was in the main designed to serve the interests of the land-holding class. The new 166 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM system, if it is adopted, can be carried only by a sufficient number of votes of the whole population and in the national interest. The word, if we continue to use it, will have a new significance. The thing it now denotes will be very different from the old. The details of the measures we adopt will depend on circumstances. The first step is to convince the country that such measures are necessary — that is to say, we must first attain to clearness as to principles. Practical details can be afterwards discussed and arranged. Nor should we forget that the situation may undergo even radical changes. When the tobacco trade of this country was recently menaced by American competition, it promptly organized itself to meet the invasion. It is possible that our iron and steel trades may find it necessary to form some kind of syndicate or trust to deal with dumping. There may be an international agreement among the British, German, and American steel trades to divide the world market among them so far as they can. Proposals to that effect have been mooted. In either case we TARIFF REFORM 1G7 may see a gigantic monopoly established in this country, and whatever happens it will be the duty of Government to see that the country receives no detriment. For it is essential that we continue to have an efficient and flourishing steel industry, and also that it be not a monopoly burdensome to the people. A great British iron and steel syndicate would be fairly adequate to deal with dump- ing. The cheap raw material or partly manufactured article would be welcome, as the organized trade would see that one department should not be injured for the benefit of others, and it could arrange the prices of finished articles to meet the invaders. But, whether fighting its German or American rivals, or operating as a huge monopoly in the home market, it would be for the interest of the country that our Government should be in close touch with it, to support it in international competition, or to control it in its action as a monopoly. For we may assume that the country is not yet prepared to see the iron and steel trade formed into a 168 THE FISCAL PROBLEM public trust on the model of that proposed under the Port of London Bill. Such a trust, we need not say, while going by the same name, would be a thing totally different from the American trust. Such a trust, formed and controlled under public auspices, is a type worthy of serious reflection in connec- tion with the present controversy. On one point, as it seems to me, there is no reason for doubt. We shall need a Govern- ment that will keep itself in closer touch with the business life of the country. The Governments of the United States and of our great self-governing colonies, as well as the Government of Germany, show a far deeper interest and take a far more active part in the industrial and commercial life of their peoples than ours does. With us the theory that the State should stand aloof from trade, leaving it to take its course, has been too long prevalent. If we are to compete against our rivals we must give this theory up. The voters of the country should also insist that a smaller proportion of classically-trained men from Eton and Harrow and a TARIFF REFORM 169 larger proportion of men conversant with business should be found in the higher ranks of the Administration. Our Government should take a worthy part in the promotion of industries vital to the country, and for this purpose it should be itself guided by men who thoroughly understand industrial condi- tions. In many ways Government can support and supplement private enterprise, and in so doing not weaken it, but give it increasing confidence and strength. Let us show how this might be done. Lancashire has been suffering, and is likely to suffer, from the deficiency in the supply of cotton, owing to short crops in the United States. Many parts of the Empire are admirably suited to grow cotton — Queensland, South Africa, East Africa, Central Africa and Nigeria, as well as India and Egypt. Why should not a Government that has a wide out- look ahead have taken more prompt and ener- getic means to promote the growing of cotton in the former regions ? Nigeria and West Africa particularly are very well situate for growing and sending cotton to Lancashire. Bad as 170 THE FISCAL PROBLEM things are in Lancashire at present, they might be vastly worse — for example, if the dealers of cotton in America were to combine with the manufacturers there to cut off our supply altogether, and so ruin our cotton trade entirely. Such a step is not too much for the audacity and energy of speculators beyond the Atlantic. Or take our iron trade. The best of the iron ores very accessible to us at home, in Spain, and in Scandinavia, tend to become depleted. The island of Newfoundland has immense supplies of iron ore. Its Government was in difficulties some time ago, for the development of the island has been retarded by unfavour- able conditions of climate and soil. In those circumstances it should not have been beyond the wit of man to devise arrangements by which, while benefiting the people of New- foundland, we might have secured for our industries a vast supply of iron ore, which could have been cheaply conveyed across the Atlantic to our shores. What we appear above all things to lack, both in our Govern- ment and in our business men, is a sufficient TARIFF REFORM 171 measure of the initiative and energy which we see at work across the Atlantic. We have already spoken of the need for progress in our land system and our agri- cultural methods. The movement for tariff reform leading to favourable consideration for agriculture will give a really progressive Government the right to encourage, if not to insist on, much needed change. It is no exaggeration to say that no working man who has any self-respect or any regard for the future of his children will stay on the land. For generations the intelligent and enterprising rural worker has gone into the towns or to the colonies in search of a decent and honour- able career. The progress in education, by intensifying the discontent with such con- ditions, has only increased this tendency. The time has come when this should be entirely changed. About the w r ay to do so there should be no manner of doubt. Denmark, France, and more recently, Ireland have shown us the way, and we could improve upon it. The rural cultivator should have access to the land, and should have some 172 THE FISCAL PROBLEM kind of fixed relation to it and interest in it. The ideal would be a system of freehold homesteads, occupied under the sanction of the State and worked by co-operative methods. The English rural worker has been a land- less serf, and he has had no home in the true sense of the word. To him the love and joy and pride of home have been feelings hardly known. The freehold homestead would give him a home and a fixed interest in the soil of his country. The area of the homestead should be sufficient to employ and support a family. Being freehold, it would be handed down from father to son, so long as the end be fulfilled for which it is instituted. Around it, therefore, would gather all the beautiful and tender and sacred associations which naturally cling to the family and ancestral home. Under modern conditions such a freehold could be suitably and effectively worked only by co-operative methods. Co-operative banks and co-operative dairies would need to be established on an adequate scale. Co-operative buying of seeds and manures, as well as TARIFF REFORM 173 co-operative selling, should be greatly extended. In many parts of the country co-operative drainage and co-operative weeding would be a prime necessity. Not a hundred miles from London are many districts where the curious traveller is in doubt what the prevailing crop may be — weeds or wheat, weeds or potatoes. It is possible enough that England may never again be a wheat-growing country on the extensive scale that at one time pre- vailed, but for dairy and garden farming, as well as for stock-raising and for root-crops, we have advantages which are not surpassed in any country in the world. Such farming would be eminently suitable for the freehold homestead, and the freeholder would have close at hand one of the very best markets in the world. A long time, unfortunately, may pass before such an ideal be extensively realized, but it is one towards which we should work. Every approximation towards it is desirable. There is another matter which is hardly less important. For three centuries of English history we have had a Poor-Law system which 174 THE FISCAL PROBLEM can only be regarded as a lamentable make- shift, designed to mitigate evils which should never have been allowed to come into existence. The time, we hope, has come when measures more in harmony with good public policy and industrial democracy may be adopted. In past days it has too frequently been the workman's lot after passing through the intermediate horrors of accident, sickness, and want of employment, to look forward to the final horror of the workhouse. However it may be with the unthrifty and dissipated poor, this is not a tolerable lot for the thrifty and indus- trious worker. More than twenty years ago Germany showed us a better way of dealing with accidents, sickness, and old age. The German way may not be the best that we could imagine, but it was at least a beginning. Let us try to improve on the German method. With regard to our commercial relations with foreign countries, we have heard far too much about retaliation in this Fiscal contro- versy. As w r ar is not the first but the last word in diplomacy, so retaliation is not the first but the last word in international trade. TARIFF REFORM 175 A new Fiscal policy would simply be an intimation to foreign countries that we are not prepared to see vital industries ruined by unfair competition. The mere discussion of it raised by Mr. Chamberlain has already had a very salutary influence in Germany. We are the very best customers of France, Germany, and the United States. From the United States we usually take about half the farm products exported ; in 1901 we took 42 per cent, of their entire exports. From France we import to the annual value of about £50,000,000, or three times as much as they import from us. The group of countries, Germany, Holland, and Belgium, which commercially should be regarded as one, imported from us about £26,000,000 less than we got from them in 1902. In such a strong position we could surely do much by friendly negotiation to improve our trade with these countries. The weapon of retaliation would be kept in the remote background. At the same time, one would be quite ready to advocate total prohibition of certain imports if necessary to protect vital industries. 176 THE FISCAL PROBLEM It may now be taken as part of the policy of America to conclude commercial treaties. In accepting the nomination for the Presidency in 1904, Mr. Roosevelt said that, whenever the need arose, there should be a readjustment of the tariff. It was beyond doubt that such changes could be made only by those devoted to the principle of Protection. He added : " We believe in reciprocity with foreign nations on the terms outlined in President McKinley's last speech, which urged the extension of our foreign markets by reciprocal agreements whenever such agreements could be made without injury to American industry and labour." Under a system of commercial treaties not unlike that with France in 1860, our trade with our kinsmen in America would be really much freer than it is now ; and we should also have a freer trade with our neighbours in France, Belgium, Holland, and Germany — freer and more profitable. In connection with this subject it may be well to say something further about the general relation of the State to industry. After the TARIFF REFORM 177 great struggles of the seventeenth century, as we all know, Parliament became the controlling power in the State ; but Parliament itself was mainly controlled by the landed class, which, in general, moved the whole machinery of government in its own interests. During the early part of the nineteenth century that class imposed and upheld the Corn Laws and strenuously opposed reform, especially the reform of the franchise. The result was that the rising industrial middle class and the mass of the people came to look upon the Government as a kind of alien power, or, if you like, a necessary evil, whose operations must be kept within strict bounds. Such a view had a very reasonable historical justification. The movement for freedom in England was to a large degree simply a powerful reaction against a State dominated by a landed aristocracy. Repeated extensions of the franchise have now changed the old state of affairs. The basis of political power in this country is an electorate consisting of the mass of the people. But the theory of government still held by 12 178 THE FISCAL PROBLEM many takes no account of this vital change in the basis of power. They still adhere to the view that the Government is an alien power, which must be distrusted and opposed, or at least curtailed. We do not affirm that there is no justifica- tion whatever now for retaining this view. The Government has defects enough. But the right and reasonable way now is, not to suspect, circumscribe, and weaken it, but to make it a more efficient organ for the promotion of the public good. If we have not such a Govern- ment, the want of it will be serious ; it may be a fatal element of weakness in the competi- tion which we must now wage w T ith foreign countries. The view of the functions of the State to which we have referred, while it had full justification as a phase of history, is at the present time mainly a prejudice ; and it is not an idle or harmless prejudice : it may be a fatal one. One of the worst consequences of such a theory of government is to discourage prevision, and that preparation for the future which is based on prevision. There are many things TARIFF REFORM 170 which Government alone can do, and if Govern- ment is trammelled and disabled, in accordance with the theory, they will not be done at all. Our politicians meanwhile, finding their legiti- mate functions limited, have had plenty of time to play the party game, and so it has become habitual with them to spend an in- ordinate time in playing the party game, to the detriment of the country. Thus the want of prevision and of timely preparation has been elevated almost into a first principle of government, and one of the prime functions of Parliament and of politics generally is to play the party game in the most unedifying manner. Recent events have shown that those two defects are as bad as ever. In past times we have been able, in spite of them, to muddle through by virtue of the vitality and energy of a growing nation, on which more than aught else Anglo-Saxon superiority has depended. It would be the height of unwisdom to rely on our doing so in the altered circumstances of the. country and Empire. The circumstances of the Empire call for 12—2 180 THE FISCAL PROBLEM insight, prevision, and initiative. In the sphere of industry and economics we need a wide constructive policy, in which Protection will be merely an incident, though it may be a very important incident. We are in want of a well-considered organic policy that can rise above routine and pedantry and the miserable, endless strife and sophistry of parties. In Germany the Monarch and his servants of the bureaucracy play too great a part. Government in the United States seems destined, if the people do not assert them- selves in time, to be more and more controlled by combinations of millionaires. Our colonies at the antipodes hold that the State should be and is a co-operative society, in which each citizen has a share. We agree with the colonies. It will indeed be a happy day for this country when every voter feels assured that the theory and practice of government among us rise to something like the colonial ideal. Under such a government it would be clear that the argument of the cheap and the dear loaf belongs to a condition of things which we TARIFF REFORM 181 have for ever left behind. But even in our present circumstancess it is one that should have little real weight. Everyone who has any acquaintance with the working classes knows that the essential thing for them is regular employment at a reasonable wage. It is most important that bread be cheap, but compared with stead}^ employment a difference of a halfpenny in the quartern loaf is of very little consequence. If a system of mutual preference with the colonies gives us a secure and continually expanding market, which will lead to regular employment at home, we may cheerfully pay, if need be, a halfpenny more for our quartern loaf. We get along in life every day by striking a balance of advantages and disadvantages. So it must be in Imperial business. We may be sure that the tariff wall in the colonies will be kept so low as to offer us such a market. The colonists are our kinsmen, and are men of business besides, and would not mock us with vain proposals. Their own industries can thrive in reasonable com- petition with ours. For a really progressive policy the first 182 THE FISCAL PROBLEM condition is to be rid of formulas. Speaking of omens, Hector, son of Priam, said that there was but one best omen — to tight for our country. So the statesman has only one best formula — to think and act for the interests of the country and empire. And if it be urged that such a formula, being agreed to by all, does not afford much guidance, we may reply that we do gain a great deal if we recognise that other formulas are not only useless, but misleading. CHAPTER XII THE STATE AND PROGRESS It will be seen that tariff questions are a most important moment or factor in the evolution of modern States, and in the struggle for existence on which evolution largely depends. The strength of a nation can be duly fostered only by the full utilization of its natural resources and advantages, by the development of the industrial aptitudes of the people which is thus secured, and by the promotion of their physical, mental, and moral well-being in the widest sense. In other words, national strength in the long- run is based on a numerous, efficient, highly- trained, and prosperous population, which is able to make adequate use of its natural resources and opportunities. 183 184 THE FISCAL PKOBLEM From this point of view we may better understand how serious a matter it is that our rural population has declined to such an extent since 1851. Our experiences in the South African War should have brought home to us the lesson that military aptitudes are most likely to be cultivated by life in the country. We can see how essential it is for Germany that the decay of her rural popula- tion should not be the price she has to pay for her industrial prosperity. For France, which has no such great stores of coal and iron as Germany, it has been even more vital to protect her farming population from American competition. Russia has found by bitter experience the disadvantage of depend- ing on foreign countries for manufactures and for the technical skill needed for manufactures and in war, and appears, therefore, to be determined, in the face of great present sacrifices, to build up a native industry. And she is likely to be successful. She is becoming in the widest sense a self-sufficing empire. With regard to cotton, for example, she not only grows her own raw material in THE STATE 185 Central Asia, but manufactures it in her own mills. All these three great countries have, after mature reflection, decided that it is good national business to make sacrifices for the present in order to secure greater future advantages, or to lose in one direction in order to make a larger gain in another. We may be assured, then, that the adoption of Protection by countries like Germany, France, and Russia is not a piece of eccen- tricity, as some Free Traders believe, but a policy arrived at after careful inquiry and long deliberation by their most competent men. It is their method of safeguarding the most vital interests of their people. We may ourselves some day be called upon to decide whether we shall need to safeguard industries which are essential to the equipment of our fleet ; for it is not likely that a highly- developed technique will flourish in the Government dockyards and arsenals after it has begun to decline in the country at large, if we allow certain of our staple industries to go down. We have already referred to the lamentable deterioration of the national 186 THE FISCAL PROBLEM physique caused by the evils of factory life and the decline of agriculture. With regard to a matter of vast importance, we now appear to have reached a turning- point in the history of the world. As the city State made way for the territorial State or nation, so the nation is now passing into the empire or vast aggregate of States. At present there are only four great political systems in the world — the British Empire ; the United States (through the Monroe doctrine exercising a vague kind of protec- torate over the American Continent) ; the Central European Powers, led by Germany ; and the Dual Alliance, consisting of France and Russia. In politics, as in industry, the scale has grown, and success in the future will be largely a question of scale. The greatest problem of all is how to combine efficiency with the large scale. This is specially the problem for the British Empire. We have got an empire sufficiently vast. How can we make it efficient ? Amid much that is difficult and obscure, some points are clear enough. THE STATE 187 The broad foundation of the Empire is to be found in the community of blood, language and literature, history and institutions, social and political ideals, which exists among the people who have founded it ; and the Empire continues by the free assent of this people. Feelings of sentiment and of enlightened self- interest concur to make the assent not only free, but easy and natural. As a powerful navy and a sufficient army are required for the safety of the Empire, the problem of defence is a vital one, which should concern all its parts and members. To all these bonds should the tie of a closer common interest in matters of trade be added ? As the Empire rests on the free assent of its leading members, so it is clear that in all matters pertaining to defence and trade the leading members must exercise perfect freedom. Our self-governing colonies are perfectly justified in retaining in their own hands, so far as they wish it and see good, the general problem of organizing their local defences, both military and naval. They will also retain fiscal autonomy in the fullest sense, 1 8 8 THE FISCAL PROBLEM and we may be sure will not allow their tariffs to be regulated by any body of men sitting in London, however composed. For ourselves we shall claim the same freedom. On this basis there may be wide scope for mutual preferences. Anything like a hard- and-fast arrangement, if attempted, would only do harm. On these points there can hardly be any doubt. The self-governing colonies best know their own circumstances, and they have not yet lost their distrust of Downing Street. Our mismanagement of the War in South Africa, largely due to the spirit of routine and to our want of knowledge and insight into local conditions in that country, has certainly not tended to lessen it. They are members of the Anglo-Saxon family circle who have come of age and who are preparing for a great future, which they must work out in their own way and on their own responsibility. Events like the War in South Africa, which no one can foresee, may, by methods we know not, hasten the consolidation of the Empire. There can be no harm in discussing THE STATE 189 principles and possibilities, but any attempt to hurry things unduly would be mischievous. In the meantime we should remember that the vastness of the scale on which empires are being conducted is growing, and that the responsibilities which the British Empire is imposing are becoming more onerous every year. It is not only desirable, but necessary, that a greater organic unity, leading to a greater efficiency, should be attained. The consolidation, security, and peaceful progress of the Empire are objects so splendid that a considerable economic sacrifice on the part of Great Britain would be justified, if necessary, to obtain them. But no sacrifice beyond what we already make for our navy and in other ways appears to be needed. The system of preferences by which we should always have an available and an expanding market in the colonies would far more than compensate for moderate taxes on food. A system of preferences, once adopted, might in time also assist us in entering into better trade relations with the United States. Next to our own colonies, it would in every 190 THE FISCAL PROBLEM way be desirable to give a preference to the States. As we are their best customers, we should be able, when negotiations for com- mercial advantages began, to do something effectual in the way of bargaining with them. The fear of offending them by granting preferences to the colonies may be dismissed as one of the very worst arguments adduced during the Fiscal controversy. If Britain is to be afraid of doing in the most moderate way what America has been so long doing to excess, if we are the only people in the world who dare not adopt a national Fiscal policy when it suits our interests, then indeed we have been brought low. It is vastly more probable that the Americans, as a practical people, will be ready to deal with us, when bargaining is going on. A reduction of their tariff in certain directions would, we imagine, do no harm to them and much good to us. Their home market is so large, so varied, and so rapidly growing that a moderate share of it for certain classes of our goods would make a serious difference to our manufacturers. The time is surely come when a wider and freer THE STATE 191 comprehension of our business relations with America, and an intelligent management of them, would be better than allowing them to take their course, as we have hitherto done. Reciprocal commercial relations, established in a rational and friendly way, would probably lead to closer political relations. The greatest disaster which the Empire has sustained was, we need not say, the revolt of the American colonies, caused by the obstinate unwisdom of George III. It would be unwisdom tenfold worse if we did not strive to undo the mischief he wrought. Peaceful co-operation, leading to a reunion of the English-speaking peoples on a federal basis, should be our aim. Such a re- union will perhaps not be so difficult as it may appear. In all the vast heritage of the English race the Mississippi Valley, or, to be more accurate, the vast region between the Atlantic and 100° W., the line about which the rainfall ceases to be adequate, has the greatest permanent natural advantages and resources. There can hardly be any doubt that it is destined to be the central home of the race, and the American Republic will naturally become 192 THE FISCAL PROBLEM the head of the race. The Republic need not assert such a position, which will come to it in the inevitable course of events, and all the more readily if it is not prematurely or unduly asserted. The greater will naturally draw unto itself the less. Such a prospect opens up a wide vista of political transformation, along which we may see interesting glimpses of the probable future of the British Empire. So much as to a possible future. For the present, we are sure that it is the bounden duty, in private and public life, of every man who speaks the English tongue and shares in the superb traditions of our race to do nothing that may hinder such a peaceful reunion, and to leave nothing undone that may aid in bringing it to pass. Some of my readers may not agree with me as to the future position of America in the English-speaking world. They may say, and rightly, that in the aggregate the British Empire will continue to be more powerful than the United States is likely to be. But the geographical and other difficulties which hamper the organic action and development THE STATE 193 of the Empire are very serious, whereas the Republic lies in the centre of the English world. Fronting the two great oceans, the Atlantic and the Pacific, the Republic is admirably situated for leading the future destinies of the great nations that will speak our tongue. We will not labour this view, though we believe that it is a simple interpretation of growing facts. The main point for us at present and in the near future is to promote common feeling and harmonious action, with a view to federal reunion. No one need fear that such a federation would lead to aggres- sive policies and militarism. It would be useful for common defence, but it would be little suited for offensive war. It would insure peace over about one-half the land surface, and tend to secure it on all the seas of the globe. Such a federal union need not involve any jealousy of other great Powers. With regard to Germany, for example, everyone who has any knowledge of history, every lover of historical equity, must be glad that the 13 194 THE FISCAL PROBLEM Fatherland has at last won a worthy place among' the nations. After a journey through the dark valley of humiliation, which con- tinued for centuries, she has gained a place in the sue. Her influence in Central Europe has been a steadying one. Her policy is not one of heady adventure, or reckless, irresponsible ambition, but is the far-seeing and enlight- ened pursuit of high national aims. We have for centuries had the best place in the sun, and can keep it without any reasonable cause for misunderstanding with Germany. What we have to do is to cultivate an enlightened sense of our own real interests, national and Imperial, and for these we have ample scope. While this is so, we should uot forget the penalties that wait on national inefficiency. National efficiency must be many-sided. Nations that desire to remain great must be widely skilled in the arts both of war and peace. All these branches of efficiency must be deep- routed in a wise insight, which discerns the signs of the times in which we live ; and no one who discerns the signs of the times can fail to see that the English-speaking race THE STATE 195 again stands at the cross-roads. Issues far beyond human calculation will depend on the road we choose. When the English Monarchy came to the cross-ways at the crisis with the American colonies it made a wrong choice, in a spirit of unwisdom, arrogance, and obstinacy. How unutterably lamentable it will be if from faction, prejudice, or pedantry we choose wrong now ! It is possible we may. But there are many grounds for the sure hope that it will not be so. The signs showing the road we ought to travel are so many and so plain that we can hardly fail to read them aright. Economics and politics, interest and sentiment, all point the same way. It is, indeed, one of the happiest features of the whole situation that the political interests of the English-speaking world agree with its indus- trial and commercial interests in recommending a course of action, which is enjoined also by the highest morality. The great English family of nations, one of the most glorious births of time, has arrived at the stage, to which all families some day come, when the younger members begin power- 13—2 196 THE FISCAL PROBLEM fully to react on the parents. Beyond the Atlantic the great Republic has long been of full age, and Canada has been for more than a generation in the same position. Australia and New Zealand have more recently followed their example. A South African Common- wealth, based on the reconciliation of Boer and Briton will, we hope, soon take a worthy place beside her sisters. There will then be four great daughter States — great on the Continental scale. Freedom will still be an essential condition controlling the relations of the Motherland and her daughters, but it should be free asso- ciation, not free competition. Peace, concilia- tion, arbitration, association, should be growing factors in the development of the mighty family circle. Wise, far-seeing direction in this spirit should take the place of the short-sighted reliance on things muddling through. Circumstances are now quite different with us from the days described by Bismarck in his speech in the German Reichstag on May 2, 1879, when he spoke of the great and mighty England, the strong athlete with well-trained THE STATE 197 muscles, entering the commercial arena and challenging all comers. Those days of vic- torious free competition in trade have for ever passed away from us. Giant athletes have appeared in the arena to take up our challenge. The most oi^antic of all is one of our own children. It will be one of the most fatal delusions that ever afflicted a great people if we imagine that we can contend successfully against such rivals under the conditions which have now set in. There is a better way lying straight and plain before the mind's eye of all men who are able to see. It is the way of friendly under- standing and negotiation, of fair dealing, of straightforward and sympathetic co-operation on the higher levels of industrial, commercial, and political life. In the case of the eldest daughter of the English family circle, it has first of all been the way of reconciliation. We have gone that way already with the less hesita- tion because we knew that the past mischief was entirely of our own making. The best results, encouraging us to further efforts, have followed. We have only to persevere in well-doing. 198 THE FISCAL PROBLEM As is usual and natural, the political con- ditions thus established will react on the economic. The vast and growing requirements of empire are imposing on the Motherland a burden of taxation which might in time prove intolerable ; but as the daughter States take up their share of privilege and responsibility, our obligations will be lightened. In this way we shall be able to reconsider our economic and Fiscal position with reference to our alter- ing circumstances, and thus continually adjust ourselves to our changing environment. It should be our constant endeavour, by strenuous reform at home, and by keeping ourselves in harmony with our environment, to secure a steady, wise, and beneficent progress. THE END BILLING AND SONS, LTD., PRINTERS, GUILDFORD BOOKS BY J. SHIELD NICHOLSON, PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL KCONOMV IN" THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINUL'Rc.ll PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. 3 Volumes, Demy 8vo., cloth. Vol. I. (Books I. and II.) Price 15s. Vol. II. (Book III.) Price 12s. 6d. Vol. III. (Books IV. and V.) Price 15s. " We have no hesitation in affirming our belief that his treatise is destined to attain a wide circulation and to exercise considerable influence, and that it will occupy a place in contemporary economic literature as deservedly high as it promises to be eminently useful." — Economic Journal . "The author goes below the surface of things; he supports his statements by sound argument ; his style is forcible and clear ; his broad views of life cannot fail to help any searcher after truth." — Economic Review. "A masterly treatment of the theory and art of taxation, subjects of some practical importance to citizens at the present time." — Daily Chronicle ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. Demy 8vo„ eloth. Price 7s. 6d. net. This work is intended primarily for the use of students. The leading principles are stated, as far as possible, without the introduction of con- troversial matter. At the same time, throughout the work indications are given of the points still in dispute and of the difficulties involved in the further development of the principles and theories of which an elementary exposition is given. The work is based on the " Principles of Political Economy " (3 vols.), by the same author, but it is not simply an. abstract, and for the present purpose the material used has been almost entirely recast. At the end of each chapter references are given to other works so as to suggest wider and more varied reading. PUBLISHED BY ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE, LONDON. [p.t.o.] BOOKS BY PROF. J. S. NICHOLSON— continued. MONEY, AND ESSAYS ON MONETARY PROBLEMS. Sixth Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Crown 8vo.. cloth. Price 7s. 6d. PRESS OPINIONS. "It is superfluous to say that throughout Trofossor Nicholson writes with a mastery of facts and of style. He is never diffuse and never pedantic ; his conclusions, right or wrong, are made available to all, and the grounds on which they are based are put within the grasp of the least instructed reader." — Economic Review. BANKERS' MONEY, A SUPPLEMENT TO MONEY. Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 2s. 6d. net. STRIKES AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS. Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 3S. 6d. " No one can dispute the lucidity and sugges- tiveness of his reasoning, or the value of this work both for Academic students and for men of business who desire to have a deeper know- ledge of the conditions under which they thrive than can be gained from a knowledge of the mart alone." — Scotsman. ' ' The first, and in some respects the principal, chapter deals with ' Strikes and a Living Wage,' and that a discussion on this matter is oppor- tune will be granted. To say that Mr. Nichol- son's arguments are new would be to say what he himself would not at all agree to ; they are old, but because they are old they are in danger of being forgotten ; they are vital, and therefore ought to be remembered."— Times. HISTORICAL PROGRESS AND IDEAL SOCIALISM. Second Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth. Price is. 6d. " In publishing his address to the British Association at Oxford, Professor Nicholson has made an important contribution to the litera- ture of the socialistic controversy. He has the courage of his convictions, the knowledge by which to support them, and the power of present- ing them in a striking and interesting manner. Professor Nicholson's opponents would do well to consider seriously whether they are in a position to answer his objections.' — Manchester Guardian." THE TARIFF QUESTION. WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO WAGES AND EMPLOYMENT. Crown 8vo., paper covers. Price 6d. This is the Address referred to by Mr. Asquith in his Speech in Fife, October 14, 1903, when he said : ' ' Another contribution to the question which also appears to-day is well worthy of being read and pondered. I refer to the opening address which was given by Professor Nicholson, Pro- fessor of Political Economy in the University of Edinburgh, to his class yesterday. Professor Nicholson is one of the most distinguished of British economists. As far as I know, he is not a politician. I have not the remotest idea to which political party he belongs, or whether he belongs to either, and it is all the more important and significant, therefore, that you should observe that a student moving in the daylight of reason, with no political or party axe to grind, contributes his share by a masterly analysis of the leading factors of the case to demolish the very foundation of this pernicious scheme for the revolution of British industry." PUBLISHED BY ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE, LONDON. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles DUE on the last date stamped below. L D^jffi® 7-4 uA* wy\T ^•i Form L9-25m-9,'47(A5618)444 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY AA 001 007 284