tm^ix i C^v^ , IL^ ~ \^Dt .% UeSB LIBRARY AUNT ELINOR'S LECTURES ^rct)itectuie. LONDON: GILEF.RT iV RIVINGTON, PRINTERS, ST. johk's square. FRONTISPIECE. \ 1 ^U^»^k^^J_ North Transept, "Winchester Cathedral. AUNT ELINOR'S LECTURES ^tct)iUctute, DEDICATKI) TO THE LADIES OF ENGLAND, Fall if ye must, ye Towers and Pinnacles, With what ye symbolize; authentic story Will say, ye disappear'd with England's glory. Wo II DS WORTH. - 0\DON : PRINTED FOR J. G. F. & J. RIVINGTON, SI. TAUL'S CHURCH YARD, AM) WATERLOO PLACE, PALL MA 1. 1.. MDCCCXLlir. C O N T E N T S. Lecture Page Introductory Letter 1 I. Architecture In general 8 II. English Church Architecture 22 Table showing the duration of the Stj'les of English Archi- tecture 35 List of Technical Terms ib. III. The Anglo-Norman Style, 1065— 1189 40 Anglo-Norman Churches in Sussex and Hants 51 IV. The Early- English Style, 1189— 1307 55 Early English Churches in Sussex 69 V. The Decorated Style, 1307—1377 75 Decorated Churches in Sussex 85 Decorated Churches in Hants 87 VI. The Perpendicular Style, 1377—1546 88 Perpendicular Churches in Sussex 99 Vll. Fonts and Altars 102 Vlll. Stained Glass 122 Illuminating Manuscripts 135 Conclusion 139 List of Works for Study 143 AUNT ELINOH'S LECTURES ON ARCHITECTURE. Jntrotiuctorj) Eettcr. MISS MONTAGUE TO THE REV. AUSTIN MONTAGUE. Elminghurst Rectory, May 29, 1842. My DEAR Austin, 1 AM determined to be the first to announce to you that Aunt Elmor is coming before the world as an authoress ! Here is the history of the event. No doubt, you remember my telhng you last January that Aunt had been so kind as to draw up some Lectures on Architecture for the children's winter- evenings' amusement. Our neighbours at the Hall heard of them, and begged to be present at the read- ings. I believe the Hall was imcommonly dull just then. The Irbys were at Brighton, the Lortons at Paris, and the only visitors at Elminghurst Hall were that agreeable trio, Messrs. Harbottle, Hubert, and Tantivy. Mr. Dalton used to hunt all day, and sleep on the sofa after dinner, so the girls were glad of an excuse to spend an evening at the Rectory. The INTRODUCTORY LETTER. lectures were found so amusing, that Aunt Elinor continued them all through the winter ; and the Daltons were so much delighted with the study — quite a new one to them — that they have had a mania for antiquities ever since, Agatha has made sketches of all the interiors, fonts, &:c. for miles round, and Miss Dalton has nearly succeeded in persuading her father to give up his pew, and consent to the open sittings. Nay, more, as soon as "the Squire" gives in, they mean to go with me to lay siege to the churchwardens and Mr. Oakley, and try whether the united voices of three yomig ladies will be able to talk over the old farmers, and persuade them that they might attend church just as profitably without shutting themselves up in deal boxes. But to return to Aunt Elinor and her book. Who should appear at the Rectory-gate last Wednesday but dear old Dr. Spelman ! He took the journey to see the relics of the painted window, which were found in the churchyard. He pronounces them very fine, and says that, with patience and judgment, the fragments may be put together again ; and Aunt Elinor and Agatha Dalton have spent the last three mornings in trying to arrange the pieces, under the old antiquary's superintendence. The doctor asked to see Aunt Elinor's Lectures, and was so much pleased with them, that he insisted on their being published ; and Aunt Elinor has at last consented. She intends devoting the profits to the fund we are trying to raise towards restoring the church ; the parish will grant a rate for the necessary repairs, and INTRODUCTORY LETTER. 3 we must exert ourselves to treble or quadruple the sum, in order to restore the church to any thing like its pristine beauty. Agatha Dalton proposed a bazaar ; but of course we would not hear of such a thincr. I told you lonjy ajjo that Mr. Dalton had given £20, and the girls £10 each, towards the re- pairs ; but since they have read and thought so much on ecclesiastical architecture and local history, they are beginning to feel how small a sum that is to offer out of their abundance, in comparison with the generous deeds of their ancestors. The girls have both doubled their own donation, and Catharine has told me (in confidence) that she means to give the sum she had intended to spend on a musical work- box in addition. They mean to attack their father on the subject, and to tell him that they will give up the visit to Leamington he promised them this sum- mer, if he will devote the sum it would cost to the church ; and they are sure he will willingly do it, as he detests going to watering-places, and would give a good deal to escape fulfilling his promise. Is not this a change in the Daltons, dear Austin, delightful to witness ? I must tell you an anecdote of our little Lucy, which will delight you. She told me, as a great secret, that she wanted to give to the church the £3 her godfather sent her, and wished me to tell papa of it for her, and to beg him not to say any thing about it to her, especially before the other children, because it makes her " so red and trembling." Long as this letter is growing, I must tell you of R 5 INTRODUCTORY LETTER. my triumph in gaining over farmer Bull to our side about the pews. xA-t the vestry meeting last week, papa proposed to demolish the clerk's desk, (you know what an unsightly thing it is,) and substitute for it a stool and letturn. Nobody at first seemed willing to oppose papa's project (though he saw by their faces they thought it nonsensical). At last farmer Bull suddenly rose, and exclaimed in a loud voice, (pronouncing the a in the word change as if there were no final e,) " I don't like change ! I won't have change ! ! and there shan't be change ! ! ! " con- cluding with an energetic thump on the table. Several of the other farmers called him to order ; and Mr. Bull, recollecting himself, apologized to papa for his warmth. I must give it to you verbatim. " I couldn't very well be disrespectful to you. Sir, seeing as there's not a man in the 'varsal world — no, not the duke hisself — I esteems and respects more than the rector of Elminghurst."' After this amende honorable horn. Mr. Bull, the other fanners ventured to say, that though they would not oppose any alteration, if Mr. ^Montague decidedly wished it, nevertheless and not- withstanding, they would not pretend to say, but that they thought it was putting the parish to a useless expense, and that they disliked the new-fangled ways of pulling the churches about, to make them look pretty ! As papa thought a lecture on the sublime and beautiful would be thrown away just then, he resolved not to press the point for the present, and leave Isaac Adams to continue a more prominent object than the altar a little while longer. INTRODUCTORY LETTER. When papa told us this, we began to be alarmed for our favourite scheme of the open sittings. How- ever, yesterday evening I went to see old Nanny Ray, who, by the way, is better, and charged me to send her duty to Master Austin when I wrote next, and tell him she found the value of the " Bishop Andrewes" he gave her more every day. I stayed longer than I intended, and the sun was setting as I crossed the brook-fields. There I encountered Mr. Bull. He was surprised to see me so far from home at that hour, and insisted on seeing me across Walton Heath at least, though I had no fear myself. I thought I would take the opportunity of trying my eloquence upon him, and soon introduced the Arch- deacon's remarks on the sad state of the interior of our fine old church. Mr. Bull is not wanting in reli- gious feeling, and it was ignorance, not stinginess, which made him so averse to the proposed alterations. I gave him a sketch of the rise and progress of the pew system. I told him the date of the foundation, repairing, and pewing of our church. I proved to him that pews were an innovation, and very unchristian as well as ugly articles. Finally, I described the con- duct of the Puritans as detailed in the history of Elminghurst ; their giving the font for a horse-trough to the " Dalton Arms," from which degrading office I reminded him that papa rescued it in his own memory — their smashing all the beautiful painted windows — tlieir turning the rector out of doors, and putting a blacksmith in his place — their stealing the comnmnion plate — and, finally, their erecting pews! 6 INTRODUCTORY LETTER. Farmer Bull's face showed he did not hear this tale unmoved. When I came to that tragical part of the history, of the rector's wife dying concealed in a loft at Wood Farm, whilst her husband was in prison, the farmer passed his hand across his eyes, and ex- claimed, " The rascally villains ! hanging was too good for them." As we came in sight of the church, he said, " Thank you, Miss Margaret, for your story, you've changed my notions altogether, and I'm not too proud to own it. I shall never be able to 'bide the sight of a pew again, and you may hurl down mine to-night, if you please, and I'll pay my share willingly towards the expense of the new-old sittings." As Mr. Bull is the most influential farmer in the parish, I think it is a great point gained. I must really bring this letter to an end ; so believe me. Dearest Austin, Your affectionate Sister, Margaret. P. S. Will you send Aunt Elinor a sketch of the fine Noi-man doorway you spoke of? She will also be much obliged to you for any information respect- ing the Somersetshire churches you can give her. Dr. Spelman sends fifty kind messages to you. He says he is half inclined to regret that your present curacy suits you so well, as he w^ants to have you near him in Devonshire ; but you, dear Austin, I know, would never consent, for any selfish consideration, to quit a spot where you are permitted to be useful, and where the guiding hand of Divine Providence seems to have led you. INTRODUCTORY LETTER. 2nd P. S. Agatha Dalton wants Aunt Elinor to add two chapters on staining glass, and on embroider- ing altar-cloths, fald-stools, &:c. ; as she thinks there are many ladies who have the ability, time, inclina- tion, and money, to execute such decorations, if they did but know how to set about it. Give us your advice on this point. Rev. Austin Montague, Kelvestone, Somerset, LECTURE I. " Firm was their faith, the ancient bands, The wise of heart, in wood and stone ; Who rear'd, with stern and tnisting hands, The dark gi'ay towers of days unkno^^■n : They fill'd those aisles with many a thought, They bade each nook some truth recall, The pillar'd arch its legend brought, A doctrine came with roof and wall !" British Magazine. Architecture is the art of erecting edifices, whether for worship, for habitation, for ornament, or for de- fence. In these lectures, I shall confine myself to English Ecclesiastical Architecture, which may be considered as one branch of the style commonly known by the name of Gothic. However, for the sake of method, and for the assistance of my juvenile hearers, I will first say a few words on Architecture in general, and give a slight sketch of the Classical Orders. That architecture is of the first antiquity, is unde- niable. The necessity of sheltering themselves from PLATE I. P. DRUIDICAL. Part cf a TemisV ^ n n n f iTrnrrr ' •■^ -U ■■g "111 ■ £.£rly ■Wooden Temple. Jevn-,- V. t... Fart ci EriJiA-crt:- CLu.-^i:, liorthamptonshire. LECTURE I. 9 the heat of the sun, and the inclemency of the wea- ther, would at once suggest to mankind the idea of architecture ; and in the course of time, that love of order and beauty, which seems implanted by Almighty God in almost every human heart (though circum- stances may either increase or deaden it), would lead them to improve the forms of their rude buildings, and to add such decorations as struck their fancy. But a few strokes of the pencil will say more on this head than pages of description, and I refer you to Plate I. for an idea of the rise and progress of archi- tecture. The study of these engravings, with their accompanying explanations, having given you a clear notion of architecture considered as an art, I will describe the Antique Orders, as they are called. They are five, of which three were invented by the Greeks, and two more were in use amiong the Romans. The Grecian orders are the Doric, Ionic, and Corin- thian ; the Roman orders — the Tuscan and Com- posite. The Greek orders may claim the double merit of originality and perfect beauty, the Roman orders being imitated from them, but without improving upon them ; for whilst it is universally admitted, that the Doric and Corinthian orders approach as near perfection as possible, many critics of refined taste object to the Tuscan and Composite. Before describing the orders, it is necessary to explain the technical terms which must occur even in the simplest description. There are three grand divisions in a complete order, viz. : — 10 LECTURE I. 1. The Column. 2. The Pedestal, which supports the column. 3. The Entablature, the part immediately sup- ported by the column. These are again subdivided into three parts : — 1. The Pedestal, into base or lower mouldings — dado or die ; the plain central space ; and sur-base, or upper mouldings. 2. The Column, into base, shaft, and capital. 3. The Entablature, into architrave, frieze, and cornice. These parts are again subdivided ; but I shall, not enter into further detail on this head, wishing to avoid needless technicalities at the outset. The five orders of Classical i\.rchitecture then are, the Tuscan, Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, and Com- posite. 1. The Tuscan is without any ornament, and remarkable for strength and massiveness. 2. The Doric is an order of peculiar grandeur, uniting simplicity with dignity, and boldness with grace. The Romans made such considerable altera- tion in this order, that it must be divided into Grecian and Roman Doric. In Greece, the columns of this order were generally placed on the floor without pedestal or base ; tlie capital had no astragal, a, but a few plain fillets, h, under the ovolo, c, and a small channel under the fillets. On diis ovolo was laid the abacus, which was only a plain tile. The ornaments (in Greece) peculiar to the Doric were, the projecting intervals in the frieze, LECTURE I. 11 called triglyphs, with the guttse, or drops, (vide Plate,) and the flutings of the column. The best examples of Grecian Doric are, the Parthenon, or temple of Minerva, at Athens ; the temple of Theseus at Athens ; several other temples in Greece and Sicily ; and the three famous temples at Paestum. The Roman Doric I shall pass by, only remarking that we have but one example of the Doric of an- cient Rome, viz. the theatre of Marcellus, believed to have been erected by Augustus. The style usually called Roman Doric ought to be considered Italian rather than Roman, being really the Doric worked by modern Italian architects. 3. The distinguishing feature of the Ionic Order is the capital, which has four spiral projections called volutes, the idea of which is said to have been taken from a ram's skull, placed at the top of a post, sup- porting a roof (vide Plate). The temple on the llissus at Athens Tnow destroyed) was the most beautiful specimen of this order. The aqueduct of Adrian is Ionic. 4. The rich and beautiful Corinthian is distin- guished by the height of its capital, and the foliage and volutes with which it is ornamented. The idea of the Corinthian capital is said to have been taken from a basket, with a tile on its top, which had been left in a garden long enough for an acanthus plant to entwine itself round it. The chief examples of Corinthian are a portico, and the arch of Adrian, at Athens ; the celebrated Sibyl's temple, at Tivoli ; and at Rome, the temples of Vesta, Mars, and Antoninus ; the por- 12 LECTURE I. tico of Severus, the forum of Nerva, the baths of Dioclesian, part of the Pantheon, and two temples of Jupiter. 5. The Composite Order was formed from a mixture of the Corinthian and Ionic capitals. The examples of this order are the temple of Bacchus, the arch of Septimius Severus, and the arch of the Goldsmiths, all at Rome. The baths of Dioclesian, and the arch of Titus, are a mixture of Corinthian and Composite. In and near Athens are some small edifices which possess great beauty, though they do not belong to any one of the five orders. They are the Choragic monument of Thrasyllus, the temple of the "Winds, the lantern of Demosthenes, and the temple of Pan- drosus. Having finished this slifjht sketch of the Classical Orders, I proceed to the main subject of our inquiries, viz. : — (2rn$Ii5l) (l?ftlr5ia^ttfal ^rrljiterture. Those architects who endeavour to separate Church architecture from Church principles, make a mistake at the very outset, which does not fail to place an immovable barrier to their attaining any thing like perfection in their art. Bishop Berkeley, comparing a church with the Christian faith, says, " The divine order and economy of the one seems to be emble- matically set forth by the just, plain, and majestic architecture of the other : and, as the one consists of a gi-eat variety of parts united in the same regular LECTURE I. 13 design, according to the truest art and most exact proportion, so the other contains a decent subordina- tion of members, various sacred institutions, sublime doctrines, and soHd precepts of morality, digested into the same design, and, with an admirable concurrence, tending to one view, — the happiness and exaltation of human nature." In a church every thing should partake of a sacramental character, i. e. all external things should have a hidden meaning; every part should be a memorial of some great truth ; every object that meets the eye should convey to the mind a doctrine or a lesson. The wood and stone, which the Gentiles rendered accursed by worshipping, may, when blessed and consecrated by faith, be made to speak of their Creator ; inanimate matter, when deli- vered from the curse, which Adam's fall entailed on the very dust of the earth, may join in the great choir of the universe to celebrate the glory of God. To those who look on a church as a building raised to enable people to enjoy the eloquence of popular preachers, the view I am taking of church- building will appear fanciful, perhaps childish and ridiculous : but to those who have accustomed them- selves to a higher tone of thought, who can under- stand Milton's " Studious cloisters pale ;" and Shakspeare's " Tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, Sermons in stones, and good in every thing ;" whether they have any knowledge of ecclesiastical 14 LECTURE I. history or not, whether they possess the blessing of minds trained in sound church principles or not, such persons will not fail to enter into the beauty and reasonableness of making every portion of a sacred edifice emblematical of some point of Christian doc- trine. The Churchman takes higher ground. He does not rest his argument for the duty of construct- ing churches on this principle, solely on the beauty and self-evident propriety of such an idea. He brings forward the example of the most famed ser- vants of God among the chosen nation, and the testi- mony of history to the practice of the Christian Church ; argiunents which cannot be controverted, except by those sects of dissenters who profess to make religion wholly spiritual, and who reject ordi- nances of every kind, even the blessed sacraments instituted by our Redeemer. The examples of Moses, of David, of Solomon, and of Ezra, will not be with- out weight to reflecting minds. True, it may be objected, that the law is not binding on us, and that the saints of the old dispensation are not in every respect models for Christians to imitate. Still we can- not doubt that those parts of their characters, which were peculiarly pleasing in God's sight, may be safely copied to the end of time ; and zeal in offering the most costly and precious of their substance to enrich the sanctuary, is certainly always mentioned in terms of the highest commendation. And, surely, when we recollect that our Creator deigned not only to instruct Moses in the general design of the tabernacle, but even condescended to describe the subordinate details LECTURE I. 15 of the decorations, it is not for us to speak of the smallest portion of the arrangement of a church as beneath our attention. But to those who still fall back upon our Christian liberty, and the different spirit of the two dispensations, I would urge the example of the early Christians. As soon as free- dom from persecution allowed the Christians to build churches, they constructed them on the following plan : — The church was built from west to east, its length exceeding its breadth, and terminating in a semicircle. This form was adopted to represent a ship, in refer- ence to St. Peter's ship, from which our Saviour taught the people, which was always considered a type of the church. The early churches were divided into three parts. First, the porch for catechumens and penitents, — for those who were receiving the church's teaching, and who might join in a portion of her worship, but who had not yet been instructed in that mysterious part of the Christian faith which was so carefully veiled from the catechumens, viz. the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar, and for those who were, whilst in penitence, forbidden to receive the Holy Eucharist, and banished from the neighbour- hood of the altar, till they had made satisfaction for their sin. Next, was the body of the Church, or the nave, for the communicants or perfect Christians, as they were called : and still farther eastward was the Sanctuary, containing the altar, and appropriated to the clergy. Each of these portions of the church was separated 16 LECTURE I. from the other two by a screen or a veil, to intimate the reality and importance of the distinction which they signified between the different classes of Chris- tians. The altar was not at the extreme east end, the throne of the bishop being behind it, so that he sat facing both the altar and the people. The priests sat on either side of the bishop, in a semi-circle. The deacons stood in the presence of the presbyters. It appears not improbable, that the most ancient of our minsters were constructed with a view to this primi- tive arrangement. Bentham, in his " History of Ely," says, "That the apsis (or semi-circle) was a feature of most of the ancient Saxon churches. The eastern ends of Can- terbury, Norwich, Peterborough, and Westminster, are semi-circular or elliptical. At Canterbury the patriarchal chair of stone, now removed into the eastern chapel, called Becket's crown, formerly stood in the space behind the altar. The name of Pres- bytery is still given in some clmrches to the eastern part of the choir, beyond the stalls. In the abbey of St. Denis, in France, the choir still occupies a semi- circle behind the altar. But, after all, it must be acknowledged that we have no positive proof that the apsis ever formed the chancel in England, and it is quite certain that the choirs were arranged as at present, that is, to the west of the altar, from a very early period. Though the plan of the primitive churches was tolerably uniform, there were particular variations arising from peculiar circumstances, of which the most frequent, and in its effects the most LECTURE 1. 17 lamentable, was the conversion of heathen temples into churches. These, of course, could only be adapted to their holy use, as they best might ; and would, after all, be wanting in some of the more beautiful features of Christian architecture. In all those temples which were converted into churches, and even in those churches which were erected, though for the purpose of Christian worship, before architecture was christianized, so to speak, there was a struggle between the structure and character of the fabric and its sacred use. A temple erected to the honor of Jupiter, or of Venus, could not be supposed very capable of assuming a Christian character, and the parts and ornaments which had grown out of idolatrous uses would be worse than unmeaning in a Christian church. In proportion as the Pagan and Classical Architecture answered the purposes for which it was intended, it refused a happy adaptation to the wants of the church ; and, of course, it was not all at once that the builders of churches emancipated themselves from the tyranny of hea- then devices. The Byzantine architecture struggled, but ineffectually, against these difficulties. It still retained too much of the character of the orders devoted to heathen usages. But there arose in the west, in the middle ages — the dark ages, as we com- placently call them — a style of architecture, grow- ing in all its parts and chiiracters out of the wants of the Church, and adapting itself to the expression of the very things which the Church desires to express, in all her methods of embodying herself to the eyes c 18 LECTURE I. of the world, and to the hearts of her sons. And so entirely did this style arise out of the strivings of the Church to give a bodily form to her teaching, that it seems to have clothed her spirit almost as if the invisible things had put forth their energies unseen, but powerful and plastic, and gathered around them on all sides the very foiTns and figures which might best serve to embody them to the eye of sense. A Gothic church, in its perfection, is an exposition of the distinctive doctrines of Christianity, clothed with a material fomi, and is, as Coleridge has more forcibly expressed it, ' the petrifaction of our religion.' The greater mysteries concerning the divine object of our worship are sjTnbolized in the fimdamental design of the structure ; other Christian verities are set forth in the minor arrangement, and in the ornamental details. For instance : the mystery of the Holy and Undi- vided Trinity, and the great doctrine of the Atone- ment, are expressed in the greater elements of the structure, in the ground-plan, and in the more im- portant lines of elevation. Other articles, as the Doctrine of Regeneration in Holy Baptism, and the Commimion of Saints, find their expression in the subordinate arrangements : and the precepts of the moral law, with the promises and threatenings of the Gospel, and some of the more important parts of Ecclesiastical History, afford endless varieties of de- corative details. Such is the Gothic, or, as it may well be termed, the Ecclesiastical style of Architec- ture, wliich is theological, ecclesiastical, and mystical in all its parts and characters." LECTURE I. 19 The foregoing eloquent and forcible description of Gothic architecture, and its origin, is, for the most part, extracted from a work which has furnished me with several valuable hints. It is curious and not uninstructive to contrast its touching language with that of the sneering, sceptical Horace Walpole, who has also given us a short sketch of Gothic architecture, and its origin \ The superficial phi- losopher of Strawberry Hill was forced, by his correct eye and refined taste, to bow down before the sublimity of ecclesiastical architecture ; but he saw only the outward sign — the true meaning, discerni- ble only by the eye of faith and devotion, was hidden from the view of the scoffing materialist. This con- trast offers too another additional proof, that poetry and truth are more closely connected than some prosaic people are willing to allow. Horace Walpole, with all his acuteness and his boasted common sense, makes an absurd blunder as to the origin of Gothic architecture. "Who that considers the lives and writings of such men as St. Gregory the Great, St. Otto, St. Anselm, St. Bernard, St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Richard Bishop of Chichester, Thomas a Kempis, and many more eminent saints of "the dark ages;" besides hosts of less illustrious, but not less holy characters, which one meets with in local histories, as bishops ^ He asserts that we owe the awful character peculiar to Gothic work, to the skill of an artful priesthood, who sought by this means to gain power over the minds of men less crafty than themselves. c 2 20 LECTURE I. and builders of cathedrals, — who, I say, that examines the characters of such men, can for a moment suppose them capable of hypocrisy and artifice — of forming deep-laid schemes of aggrandizing themselves, and enslaving the people through the medium of their senses to a system of religion which they knew to he corrupt ? It would be easier to fancy Horace Wal- pole humble and devout, than to imagine those simple-minded and self-denying Christians ambi- tious and scheming politicians. But we cannot de- scribe what we do not understand. What syjnpathies could the selfish and earth-bound virtuoso have with the lofty natures of those holy men ? Consequently, not being able to enter into the characters of those whose motives he took upon himself to answer for, he falls back upon his own fancy to form a theory, which shall have some show of plausibility, and with all his cant of liberality and love of truth, he displays a mind warped by prejudice, and utterly miable to discern the root of the matter he discourses of so dogmatically. A person must be, himself, a devout son of the Church, having sympathies with our pious forefathers, and with the saints, who were altogether beyond Horace Walpole's sphere, to be enabled to judge and interpret fairly their views and intentions. There can be, I think, no question, that those who enter a fine cathedral without a lively faith, and a reverential tone of mind, will see but a very small portion of the astonishing sublimity and touching beauty of the holy edifice. I hope I have in this first Lecture given you a clear LECTURE 1. 21 idea of Architecture in general, and of the peculiar character you must expect to find in Ecclesiastical Architecture. In my next Lecture, I shall enter upon the technical details of English Church Architecture. LECTURE 11. " Where'er I I'oam in this fair English land. The vision of a temple meets my eyes : IModest without ; within, all glorious rise Its love-enclustered columns, and expand Their slender ai*ms. Like olive-plants they stand, Each answering each, in home's soft sjTapathies, Sisters and brothers. At the altar sighs Parental fondness, and with anxious hand. Tenders its offering of young vows and prayers. The same and not the same, go where I will, The vision beams ! ten thousand shrines all one. Dear fertile soil ! What foreign culture beai's Such fruit ? And I through distant climes may run My weai"j- round, yet miss thy likeness still." Lyra Apostolica. I TRUST I have succeeded in giving you a clear idea of architecture in general, and of the tone of feeling with which Ecclesiastical Architecture should be stu- died. Let us now proceed to take a survey of the progress of the art of building in this island from the earliest period. We have no clear account of the architecture of the ancient Britons before the Roman THE CLASSICAL OF.DERJ ■^i — I 11^- ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 23 invasion; but Stonehenge alone affords ample proof that the Druids expended art and labour on their stupendous temples. There is, however, no attempt at anything like elegance in the mighty monuments of their mechanical skill which remain to us. They consist merely of huge stones, two standing upright, and another placed horizontally across them, forming an impost, arranged in circles and ovals. The Romans, of course, introduced their own architecture into Bri- tain. Many Roman remains are still to be seen, but Lincoln gate is perhaps the only specimen which is still used for the purpose for which it was originally designed. The greatest part of the Roman work dis- covered in England is rude, and very inferior to the antiquities of Greece and Italy. The age of purity in the Roman architecture reaches down to several of the earlier emperors ; but very soon a profusion of orna- ment was introduced, w^hich led the way to something like debasement of composition. The palace of Dio- cletian, at Spalatro, the date of which may be consi- dered from A. D. 290 to 300, displays, amidst a profusion of ornament, a poverty of composition, and combinations of mouldings in a most barbarous taste, quite wonderful as being the work of architects who had before their eyes such models as remain to tliis day at Rome. This same palace of Diocletian con- tains, it is curious to observe, the ornament so pro- fusely used in Norman buildings, viz. the zig-zag moulding. Constantine the Great (who died a.d. 337) erected the church of St. Paul witliout the walls of Rome, a composition wliich closely resembles a Nor- 24 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. man building, and proves that the heavy early Norman style was merely an imitation of the Roman. When the Romans left the island, it is most likely that the Britons endeavoured to imitate the Roman work without being able to execute it on principle, and thus their architecture became debased into the Saxon and early Norman, intermixed with orna- ments perhaps introduced by the Danes. After the Conquest, the rich Norman barons, erecting magnifi- cent castles and churches, the execution manifestly improved, though the style still resembled the Roman mode debased. The introduction of shafts instead of the massive pier first led to an approach to that lighter mode of building which, by the introduction of the pointed arch, and by an increased delicacy of execution and boldness of composition, ripened at the close of the twelfth century into the simple yet beautiful early English style. In the course of another century, the early English became the Decorated Style, so called from the general use of flowered ornaments and the increased richness of the windows, which were divided by mullions, and decorated with flowing tracery. This style has been pronounced by some critics to be the perfection of the English mode. The flowing lines in the tracery of the windows were very diflficult to execute, and towards the close of the fourteenth cen- tury, we find these flowing lines giving way to per- pendicular and horizontal ones, the use of which continued to increase till the arches were almost ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. lost in a continued series of pannels. In one building, viz. King Henry the Seventh's chapel, thick pan- nelling covered completely both the outside and inside, fatiguing the eye by a constant repetition of small parts, which seeks in vain for the bold gran- deur of design, so nobly conspicuous in the preceding style. This florid mode is called the Perpendicular Style. The Reformation seems to have put an end to church building. Conventual churches were rifled ; the funds originally given by the founders for the purpose of keeping these magnificent structures in repair, were bestowed by the king on his favourites, and a ten- dency to despise all external pomp of worship became general. Horace Walpole tells us that " the Gothic taste remained in vogue till towards the end of the reign of Henry VHI." Henry the VHth's chapel is entirely of that style : so is Wolsey's tomb-house at Windsor. But soon after the Grecian style was introduced by the Italians entertained in the king's service. But they either were wanting in pure taste themselves, or were not allowed to introduce so great an innovation all at once. The classical style was jumbled together with the Gothic, in a most barbarous manner. Regular columns with ornaments, neither Grecian nor Gothic, and half embroidered with foliage, were crowded over frontispieces, facades, and chimneys, setting order and purity of style at defiance. This mongrel architecture lasted till late in the reign of James I. The square-pannelled and mullioned windows, with the wooden-pannelled roofs and walls 2G ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. of the great houses of the time of queen EHzabeth, seem rather a debased Enghsh than any regular style. It is not, however, without its charms for secular builchngs, and few objects are more delightful to the eye than the interior of a large and well kept up hall, in a fine Elizabethan mansion, with its great mul- lioned windows filled with stained glass ; its gigantic entrance door ; its carved-stone mantelpiece ; its deco- rations of family portraits, armour, swords, armorial bearings, and antlers, carved tables and chairs, and splendid old china ; its spacious and richly-orna- mented staircase, seen partially perhaps at one end ; its venerable and solid-looking stone pave- ment ; and its lofty and rich open roof, the crowning beauty of the whole. In the reign of James I. the Italian style rapidly became popular. The banquet- ing-house at Whitehall seems to mark the complete introduction of Roman workmanship. The tower of the schools at Oxford is a specimen of the debased English mentioned above. We find there the five Classical Orders crowded over each other into a building, with pinnacles and mullioned windows ! Some of the works of Inigo Jones are little removed from barbarism. This architect, during his residence at Venice and in other parts of Italy, had acquired a love for the Roman architecture, and during the reign of James I. he built Whitehall and St. Paul's church, Covent Garden, and was employed in making a Grecian front to the old St. Paul's cathedral. Archbishop Laud adorned his own college at Oxford (St. John's) with an additional quadrangle, which ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. was completed after designs by Inigo Jones, in 1635, at a cost of 5000/. The seventeenth century produced a man who ranks as the greatest of our modem archi- tects, Sir Christopher Wren. This remarkable man was the son of the Rev. C. Wren, dean of Windsor, and was bom at Knoyle, in Wilts, in 1632. He stu- died at Wadham College, Oxford, where he took the degree of Master of Arts in 1653, and afterwards became a fellow of All Souls. When very young he showed a genius for mathematics, and had made great progress in that science before he reached the age of sixteen. In 1657 he was made professor of astro- nomy at Gresham College, and his lectures were much admired. One subject of his lectures was the telescope, to the improvement of which he had greatly contri- buted. He also lectured on the atmosphere. About the year 1658 he resolved the problem proposed by Pascal to all the English mathematicians, and re- turned another to the mathematicians in France, to which they never gave any solution. It is recorded of him, that he proposed several methods by which to account for the shadows returning backwards ten degrees on the dial of king Ahaz, by the laws of nature, an attempt which is to be looked at with sus- picion, considering the irreverent spirit of the age in which he lived. In 1661 (having just been created LL.D.) he was sent for from Oxford by order of king Charles the Second, to assist Sir J. Denham, sur- veyor-general of the works, as he was celebrated for possessing considerable skill in architecture. In 1665 he went to France, to examine the public build- 28 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. ings and mechanical works of that country : we are told he made many useful observations. It is to be presumed, however, that he paid more attention to the palaces than to the churches of France. Sir Christopher Wren was undoubtedly a man of genius, but he lived in times even more unfavourable than our own to church principles, and, consequently, to poetic feeling and lofty aspirations. It is worthy of remark, that in an age of luxury and irreligion there is always a tendency to admire and imitate Pagan art. We see it in the times of those popes and car- dinals of the middle ages, whose self-indulgence and luxury brought down upon the Catholic church a chastisement, sent, we may hope, as a merciful correction as well as a judgment. We see it in the vicious age of Louis Quatorze, and his predecessor and successor, and in that of his contemporary, our o\\Ti Charles II. The cold and irreverent pohtical religion of the next age was equally unfavourable to Christian art; and I suppose it will be generally allowed, that the money-making, steam-going, self- sufficient nineteenth century has produced an atmo- sphere in which poetry can hardly breathe. Of the classical mania of republican France I do not speak. In open and undisguised infidels such a taste is perfectly consistent. But it is difficult to understand the feeling which makes persons, who are, without doubt, sincere believers in Christianity, gaze with more pleasure on a Greek temple than on the noblest Gothic cathedral, make the heathen authors their companions and solace, and leave the ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 29 holy fathers for ever closed. Will they say that a Gothic church is not a mighty work of art, as well as an appeal to our loftiest and best feelings ? Will they pronounce St. Clement and St. Chrysostom wanting in originality and imagination ? Will they deny to St. Ambrose an exquisite poetic feeling ; and to St. Austin agi-asp of mind, and a metaphysical acuteness, seldom equalled, and never surpassed? But I have wandered from my subject, though not so much as you may fancy, since my object is as much to make you feel the intimate connexion between catholicity and the loftiest works of art, as to make you familiar with the various styles of church building. To return to Sir C. Wren. After the great fire of London, he made a design for rebuilding the city on a uniform plan, which was rejected by parliament. After the death of Sir J. Denham, Wren had the direction of the public buildings, to be raised in conse- quence of the fire. He built St. Paul's, the Monu- ment, part of Hampton Court, Chelsea College, one of the wings of Greenwich Hospital, the churches of St. Stephen Walbrook and St. Mary-le-Bow, with upwards of sixty other churches and public works. He also built the theatre at Oxford. In 1674 he was knighted, and in 1680 chosen president of the Royal Society. Sir Christopher sat twice in parlia- ment. He died in 1723, at the age of ninety-one, and was buried with great solemnity in St. Paul's cathe- dral, in the vault under the south wing of the choir It seems scarcely fair to omit all mention of the metropolitan cathedral, in a book professing to treat 30 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. of Church Architecture ; yet St. Paul's, not belonging to the style properly called Ecclesiastical, cannot be described in the plan I have adopted. I think, however, it is allowable to give you a slight sketch of our national church in this place, and with it I shall close this lecture. St. Paul's cathedral stands in the very centre and most elevated part of the city of London. The edi- fice is built of fine Portland stone, and on the plan of a Latin cross, a form which expands easily to the eye of the spectator, and exhibits its beautiful combina- tions at one view. The whole length of the church with its portico is 500 feet, and the circumference of the building is 2292 feet. At the intersection of the nave and transept rises a magnificent dome, from the top of which springs a lantern, surmounted by a gilded ball and cross. The architectural elevation of this grand edifice consists of two orders, the lower one Corinthian, the upper one Composite. Architectural critics object to the body of the church being divided into two equal orders, instead of an attic only being added, as in St. Peter's, at Rome. The surface of the building being crowded with festoons, &:c. is another great defect. The cathedral was not built after Sir Chris- topher Wren's original design, though the great architect himself preferred it to the one afterwards adopted. In the first design the whole fabric con- sisted of one order only. The lower division of the western portico is composed of twelve coupled columns, of the Corinthian order, on a basement, ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 31 formed by a double flight of steps of black marble, and the upper of only eight columns, supporting an entablature and pediment, the tympan of which is a bas relief, representing the Conversion of St. Paul, the patron saint of the church, sculptured by Bird. On the apex of the pediment is a colossal statue of St. Paul, and at the extremities are figures of St. Peter and St. James. The dome, the most remark- able and magnificent feature in the building, is uni- versally allowed to possess great beauty and dignity. The nave and choir of the cathedral are each flanked by three arches, springing from piers, which are strengthened as well as decorated on their inner faces by Corinthian pilasters, crowned by an entabla- ture. Mr. Gwilt, an architect, who has written a description of St. Paul's, admits that Wren was a consummate mechanician ; but will not allow him to be equally great as an architect. The conical wall between the inner and outer domes, upon which the stone lantern, of enormous weight, is supported, displays great mechanical skill ; but is open to criticism on other accounts. The interior of the cupola is painted in two colours by Sir James Thomhill, representing, in eight compartments, the chief events of St. Paul's life. The dome is pierced, and through it a vista is carried up to the small dome, in which the cone ter- minates. The whole height seen through the opening forms a point of view of singular beauty and fascina- tion. The choir screen is a Corinthian colonnade, supporting a gallery for the organ, and bears the following tribute to the memory of the architect : — 32 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. SUBTUS. CONDITUR. HUJUS. ECCLESI^. ET. URBIS. CONDITOR. CHRISTOPHORUS. WREN. QUI. VIXIT. ANNOS. ULTRA. NONA- GINTA. NON. SIBl. SED. BONO. PUBLICO. LECTOR. SI. MONUMEN- TUM. REQUIRIS. CIRCU3ISPICE. " Underneath lies the builder of this church and city, Chris- topher Wren, who lived beyond ninety years, not for himself, but for the public. Reader, if you ask for his monument, look around." On each side of the choir is a range of fifteen stalls, exclusive of the bishop's throne on the south side, and a stall for the Lord Mayor on the north. The pulpit was erected about 1802. The letturn is a brass eagle, richly gilt. The apsis or tribune is the semi-circular termination to the choir, and is enriched with pilasters, painted in imitation of lapis lazuli — objectionable, as nothing that is not true and real should be admitted into the decorations of a church. Real marble, of a less costly kind, would be preferable to an ornament which affects to be what it is not. In the year 1773 a design was formed for deco- rating the cathedral with the works of our most emi- nent painters and sculptors, when the president and members of the Royal Academy offered to fill some of the compartments with pictures, without charge but the scheme, though approved by the king, was objected to by the Archbishop (Comwallis), and the Bishop of London, as savouring of popery ! It is sur- prising that these prelates did not propose taking down the bas relief of the Conversion of St. Paul, and espe- cially the images of St. Paul, St. James, and St. Peter, on the outside. About the year 1793 (Archbishop ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 33 Cornwallis having been succeeded by Arclibishop Moore), it was proposed to break the monotony of tlie interior of the cathedral, by the admission of national monuments, in honour of eminent men. Howard, the philanthropist, and Dr. Johnson, were the first to whom monuments were raised in St. Paul's. Sir W. Jones and Sir Joshua Reynolds followed. The expenses attending the erection of the cathedral were defrayed by a tax on sea-coal imported into London, the amiual proceeds of which were some- times less than the yearly charges for materials and labour. The deficiency was supplied by voluntary contributions, and by the sale of the old materials. The whole expense of erecting the edifice, deducting the money spent in attempts to repair the old cathe- dral, was 736,752/. 25. 3d. The foundation-stone of St. Paul's was laid by Sir C. Wren, on the 21st of June, 1675. In ten years the walls of the choir and aisles were finished, together with the northern and southern porticos, and the great piers of the dome were brought to the same height. The choir of the church was first opened for divine service on occasion of the thanksgiving for the peace of Ryswick, Dec. 2, 1697. Service was first per- formed in the morning prayer chapel, on the soutli side of the church, Feb. 1, 1699, and in 1710 the highest and last stone on the top of the lantern was laid by Mr. C. Wren, son of the architect, in the presence of Mr. Strong, principal mason, and others who had been employed in the execution of the work. Thus the church of St. Paul's was completed in the D 34 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. period of five and thirty years, under the superin- tendence of one architect, under the direction of one principal mason, and during the occupation of the see of London by one bishop : and it has received no alteration or addition since its original erection. In this respect the metropolitan church affords a strong contrast to our ancient cathedrals, as they were gene- rally founded by one man (frequently the Bishop), carried on by another, completed by another, and enlarged, beautified, and adorned by succeeding bene- factors. Yet in most instances we find that unity of feeling and taste enabled these various architects who built at different periods, to carry on the work with due attention to harmony and propriety, and the alterations and improvements in style, which were struck out in the course of time, seem for the most part to have arisen gradually and naturally, and harmonize with the original design instead of shock- ing the eye by gross incongruities, as modem addi- tions to ancient churches generally do. My next Lecture will be devoted to a particular description of the Norman style, and I shall leave you in the meantime the subjoined Table, w^hich I advise you to get by heart, and a list of technical terms with explanations, which you must be quite familiar with before our next meeting. ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 35 TABLE SHOAVING THE DURATION' OF THE STYLES OF ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE. William I. . . . William II. . . . Henry I Stephen .... Hem-y II. 1154 to Richard I. . . . .John Henry III. . . . Edward I. 1272 to 10G5- lon: 1100 1135 118.9. >5-| Anglo- Norman 1189^ 1199 1 Earlv 1216 r English 13071 Edward II. . . . Edward III. 1325 to 13071 Decorated 1377/ English Richard II. Henry IV. Henry V. . Henry V^I. Edward IV. Edward V. Richard III Henrv VII. Henry VIII. 1509 to 1377> 1309 1412 1422 1460 1483 1483 1485 1546y Perpendi- ' cular Endish Prevailed little more than 124 years, no re- mains REALLY KNOWN to be more than a few yeare older than the Conquest. /Prevailed about 118 \_ years. ^Continued perhaps 10 J or 15 years later. 1 Prevailed little more t than 70 years. SFe w, if any Avhole build- ings, executed in this St vie later than Henry VIII. This style used in ad- I ditions and rebuild- I ing, but often much I debased, as late as V 1630 or 1640. LIST OF TECHNICAL TERMS. Cathedrals and large churches are usually built in the form of a cross. The eastern part of the cross is the Choir. The western part the Nave. The part running north and south, the Cross or Transept. The Lady Chapel is a space beyond the altar. The Screen is a frame-work, generally richly carved, placed at the west-end of the choir. The th visions beyond the piers are Aisles. The Choir is the part immediately in front of the altar, and does not extend beyond the piers, nor include the side aisles leading 36 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. to the Lady Chapel. Chapels are attached to all parts, and are frequently additions. The Font is generally placed at the west-end, and ought never to be placed far from the entrance to the church, that position being emblematical of Baptism being the door to Christ's Church. In some ancient churches the font is placed outside the door, in a sort of chapel erected over it, called the Baptistery. The Porch is a small building attached to the door. In large churches the doors are generally at the west end ; in small ones often at the north and south sides. Cloisters are a covered walk, forming originally the chief means of communication between the various parts of the monastery attached to the church. They generally form a quadrangle, inclosing an open space in the centre. In general one side of the cloisters is joined to the church, the others consist of a series of open arches, through which the central space is visible. The Chapter-House is a room where the ecclesiastics, forming what is called the Chapter in monastic and cathedral institutions, meet on parti- cular occasions. Piers are the walls in the interior between the arches. A Steeple is a building above the roof: if it be square-topped it is a Tower. A Lanternis a short tower of light work. An opening into the tower in the interior above the roof, is also called a Lantern. Turrets are towers of great height, in proportion to their diameter, often containing stair- cases. A Spire is a tall tower, tapering to a point. Buttresses are the projections at the corners of the building, and between the windows. Set-offs are the ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 37 mouldings and slopes which divide them into stages. A Parapet is the crowning part of the walls when plain ; if indented it is a Battlement. Macchicola- tions are openings in the battlements of castellated work, for the purpose of discharging missiles. Arches are either round, pointed, or mixed. A Semi-circular Arch has its centre in the same line with its spring. A Segmental Arch has its centre lower than the spring. A Horse-shoe Arch has its centre above the spring. Pointed Arches are either Equilateral, or Drop Arches, or Lancet Arches. An Equilateral Arch is described from two centres, the whole breadth of the arch from each other, and form the arch about an equilateral triangle. The Drop Arcli has a radius shorter than the breadth of the arch, and' is described about an obtuse-angled triangle. A Lancet Arch (lias a radius longer than the breadth of the arch, and is described about an acute-angled triangle. All these arches may be of the nature of segmental arches, and have their centres below their springs. Mixed Arches are of three centres, which look nearly like elliptical arches ; or of four centres, commonly called the Tudor Arch ; this is flat for its span, and has two of its centres in or near the spring (or point from which the arch springs), and the other two far below it. The Oyee or Contrasted Arch has four centres. Spandrells are the spaces included between the arch and the square outside it. Mullions are the upright divisions in windows. Transoms are the hori- zontal divisions of windows or pannelling. Tracery is the ornamental divisions at the heads of windows, &c. 38 ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. When the lines branch out into leaves, arches, &'C. the tracery is said to be flowing — when the mullions are continued throughout, it is said to be perpendicular. Featherings are small points ornamenting the parts of tracery. Cusps are little arches in the tracery. According to their number they are called Tre- foils, Quatrefoils, Cinquefoils. Double feathering is when the Cusps are feathered again. Tablets are small projecting moiddings, or strings, mostly hori- zontal. Cornice is the tablet at the top under the battlement. Basement is that at the bottom. Drip- stone is the tablet that runs round doors and windows. When ornamented it is called a Canopy. Bands are small strings round shafts, or a horizontal line of square, round, or other paimels, used to ornament towers, spires, &:c. Niches are small arches sunk in walls, often ornamented very richly with canopies, and intended to hold images. A Corbel is an orna- mented projection from the wall, to support an arch, beam, niche, or other weight ; it is generally a figure or head, an angel holding a shield, Sec. Pinnacle is a small spire, generally four-sided and ornamented ; it is placed on the tops of buttresses, both external and internal. Crockets are the small bunches of foliage ornamenting pinnacles and canopies. Finials are the larger bunches on the top. Stalls are seats for the dean, canons, and other dignitaries, in the choirs of collegiate churches. The Throne is a rich seat for the bishop. Tabernacle ivork is the ornamented open work at the top of the stalls, and behind the altar, and any ENGLISH CHURCH ARCHITECTURE. 39 minute fret-work in general. The Rood-loft is a screen, with a large projection on the top to hold images \ placed between the nave and chancel, Sedilia are stone stalls on tlie south side of tlie altar, cut out of the wall, designed for the deacons or priests assisting at the Holy Eucharist. They vary in number from one to five, but three is the usual number. The Piscina is a stone basin (having a small liole at the bottom to carry off water), where the priest washed his hands before he approached the altar. In some old churches it is a rude niche, in others much ornamented with canopy and pinnacles. The Credence or Credentia is a ledge (generally within the same niche as the Piscina), intended as a place for the elements before their consecration. Stoups are small niches with basins, intended for holy water. The Crypt is a vaulted chapel under the church. ^ The Crucifix or Rood, with its attendant Images of the Blessed Vii-gin and St. John. LECTURE III. 1065—1189. " Not raised in nice proportions was the pile, But large and massy, for duration built." Wordsworth. I SHALL confine myself this evening to describing to you the first of the four styles of English Architec- ture, mentioned in the Table I left with you, viz. the Anglo-Norman. I ought first to remark, that many writers talk of the Saxon style, and describe buildings known to be Norman as specimens of the Saxon architecture. But it is now generally allowed, that the earliest remains we have are not older than the Conquest ; if we except the edifice of stone built by Paulinus, first bishop of York, on the occasion of the conversion of Edwyn, king of Northumbria, early in the seventh century. Paulinus built a wooden oratory over the spring in which he administered the sacrament of Baptism to the royal convert in the ARCHES. PLATE in. i-. 4:. THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. 41 year 627 ; but this soon gave place to a more sub- stantial stone fabric, parts of which were discovered beneath the choir of the York Minster during the repairs, rendered necessary by the mad act of the incendiary Martin. In the first number of " Brown's History of the Edifice of the Metropolitan Church of St. Peter, York," in Plate 3, is given a plan of Pau- linus' second edifice, where the probable position of the wooden baptistery inclosing a spring, is pointed out. These are perhaps as well authenticated Saxon remains as any in the kingdom. Mr. Rickman thinks it probable, that in some obscure country churches some real Saxon work, of very early date, may be discovered ; but he appears not to have been able to meet with any himself, and makes no mention of Paulinus' oratory. He mentions, however, two towers, which he thinks may possibly be genuine Saxon. They are the towers of the old church, St. Peter's, Barton, Lincolnshire, and that of Clapham church, Bedfordshire \ The Anglo-Norman style is for the most part massive and plain, and is distinguished by the semi- circular arch, and large solid pillars. It has some- times been called the Romanesque style, from its resemblance to the classical mode, from which it ^ In the fourth edition of Mr. Rickman 's work, a chapter is added on Saxou buildings, which jjroves that his more recent researches have discovered a great number of remains built before the Conquest ; but there Ls nothing in Saxon architec- ture to entitle it to rank as a distinct style. It is but a variety of the debased Roman. 42 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. undoubtedly was derived. In my last Lecture I remarked to you, that some of the debased composi- tions of the later Roman architects closely resembled the early Norman buildings. We find in the latter heavy columns with capitals, always having square abaci, and ranges of semi-cir- cular arches, strikingly like those of the Roman edifices ^. The earliest Anglo-Norman structures are heavy and plain, but those erected towards the close of the twelfth century possess elegance and lightness. The semi-circular arch is the distinctive mark of a Norman building. There are however a few Norman arches of very curious shapes, being more than a semi-circle, or what is called a horseshoe. The pointed arch appears to have arisen naturally from intersecting semi-circular arches. The true Norman arch appears to have continued to the latest date of the style, even when other parts of the buildings were quite advanced into the next style. Of this the Temple church is a curious in- stance. We find there several features of the suc- ceeding style, and also pointed arches formed by a range of intersecting arches, and over this the old round-headed Norman window. The ivindows in this style are small, except in very large buildings. There are no mullions ; but a double window, divided by a shaft, is not uncommon. In small rich churches 2 The Abacus, literally tile, is the uppermost division of the capital. It is an essential part of the column m the classical orders, and is very distinct in the earlier Gothic styles, but gradually becomes less perceptible in the later styles. THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. 43 the exterior is often a series of arches, of which a few are pierced as windows, and the others left blank. The existing Norman windows are generally in build- ings retaining still the entire character of that style ; for in most Norman churches they have been taken out, and others of later styles put in, as at Durham and many other cathedrals. There seems to have been little if any attempt at feathering or foliating the heads of Norman doors and windows. Norman doors are very remarkable, being generally much ornamented, and sometimes possessing great beauty and elegance. There seems to have been a desire in the archi- tects who succeeded the Normans, to preserve the doors of their predecessors. Whence we have so many of these noble, though generally rude efforts of skill remaining. In many small churches, where all else has been swept away to make room for alterations, even in the perpendicular style, the Norman door has been suf- fered to remain. The mode of increasing the richness of these doorways was by increasing the number of bands of moulding, and, consequently, the depth of the arch. Shafts are often used, and we often find in the same building one door with shafts, and another without. The mouldings of the arch are very rich. The wave or zigzag ornament is almost universal. A large round moulding, with heads on the outer edge, is common. There are also mouldings with a series of figures inclosed in a running ornament. At one church at York these figures are the zodiacal signs. The exterior moulding often goes down no 44 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. lower tlian the spring of the arch, thus fomiing an apparent dripstone. The door is often square, and the interval between it and the arch filled with carv- ings. Amongst the great variety of these doors in excellent preservation, Iffley church, near Oxford, is perhaps the best specimen, as it contains three doors, all of which are different, and the south-door is nearly unique from the flowers in its interior mouldings. South Ockendon church, Essex, has a door of un- common beauty of desicm, and elegance of execution. The cathedrals of Ely, Durham, Rochester, Wor- cester, and Lincoln, have fine Noniian doors. The western front of Rochester cathedral is one of the most perfect specimens of early Anglo-Norman archi- tecture. The central doorway is fomied by a very beautifully recessed semi-circular arch, composed of enriched mouldings, and supported by four pillars, the capitals of which consist of wreathed foliage, with birds and animals introduced. The pillars are annu- lated, or enriched by ornamental bands, and rise from a plain plinth, which has possibly been constructed in the room of an enriched base, which had become decayed. Two of the pillars take the form of cary- atides (columns in which figures supply the place of shafts), and present statues of king Henry, and his queen Matilda of Scotland, without question two of the most ancient statues remaining in England. All the mouldings of the arch are highly enriched with sculpture, representing arabesques, and medallions of heads and animals, with foliage intermixed. The lintel across the imposts of the doorway bears a THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. 45 representation of tlie twelve Apostles ; and in the tym- pan (or flat space between the top of a door, and the arch over it,) is a bas-relief, of our blessed Saviour holding a book, and in the act of giving the benediction. Such figures were anciently placed on the porch or entrance of the church, as a security against the influence of evil spirits. One of the peculiarities of Anglo-Nor- man architecture is its covering the surface of the wall with projecting ornaments, of great diversity in the detail. Upon this remarkable difference from the antique, Mr. Hope has made some observations. The severity of ancient architecture required that two component sides of an entire edifice, situated right and left of the common central point or line, should correspond not only in the general dimensions, but in the peculiar designs of their ornamental parts. If there had been a thousand columns in a single row, each would have been similar in its capital and minutest embellishment to all the rest. The architects of the middle ages were less strict : bassi relievi, in- serted in different sides of a single front, correspond not even in size, seldom do they in subject ; if one contains figures, that opposite perhaps displays foliage ; the opposite shafts or joints of the same porch are often of a different design ; and as to the capitals, when they are highly wrought, the making two alike would have been considered as poverty of invention. A church which you have all seen in this neighbourhood, will probably occur to your minds as illustrating what 1 have just said. I mean Steyning, which we saw during our last exploring 46 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. expedition in November. You were all struck with die richness of the ornamented arches, supported by massy pillars in the nave, and still more so with observing, that the carved work of each was different. The well-known wavy or zigzag ornament was however predominant throughout the whole of the building. It cannot be denied ^ that the early Nomian sculp- ture is i-ude and barbarous, when we consider the design of particular parts separately ; but it is at the same time universally confessed, that its effect as a whole is strikingly beautifid. The truth is, that there is a beauty of aggregation as well as a beauty of separate designs, and of the former the architects of the twelfth century were as perfect masters, as they were deficient in the latter. For beauty of form in works of art, and in die sepa- rate decorations, they seem to have had no taste, which is clear from their neglecting entirely the real store- house of beauty, nature ; but of the splendour of effect arising from a vast aggregation of particulars, without reference to the separate beauties of each, those artists were perfect masters — as no one will deny, when standing before the Norman doorway of Malmesbury abbey, or of Rochester cathedral. Anglo-Norman pillars are of various kinds. There is the heavy column of enormous diameter, with a capital sometimes round and sometimes square. They are generally plain, but we meet with them oma- 2 Rex. G. Pooies Ltctures. THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. mented, with channels in various forms, zigzag, net- work, and spiral. Sometimes the Norman cokmins are round, or octagonal ; in other cases square, or hexagonal ; and in a great many instances the pillars are composed of cylindrical shafts attached to each other, and set in square recesses. Examine the plates of Winkle's Cathedrals, and you will find all these varieties. It was a common practice of the Norman builders to enrich the blank surfaces of their walls with a series of arcades, whose sides were formed generally of small shafts, supporting round arches, which often intersected each other. The west-fronts of churches are frequently decorated in this manner, and some of the pannels are often perforated to fonii windows, as at Barfreston in Kent, and St. Peter's, Northampton. The walls, being of considerable thickness, and not usually of great height, did not require the additional strength and support of buttresses, which are some- times omitted altogether, or when introduced are very secondary features, being merely broad, flat, ungra- duated members, with a slight projection that finishes under the cornice or corbel table ; the parapets appear to have been quite plain. Those examples of Norman ])uttresses with small shafts at the angles, as at Glastonbury abbey, are of transition character, and are more generally found in buildings of the early English style. Anglo-Noniian porches are generally small and shallow, and in some instances, as at Ifltley, they are merely compartments of the wall, having a slight pro- jection to receive the richly moulded doorway. The 48 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. Norman cornice is frequently only a plain face of parapet, but a row of blocks is often placed under it, sometimes plain, sometimes carved in grotesque heads, and in some instances the grotesque heads sup- port small arches, when it is called a corbel-table. A plain string is also sometimes used as a cornice. The next most important tablet is the di'ipstone, or outer moulding of windows and doors, this is some- times undistinguished, but oftener a square string continued horizontally from one window to another round the buttresses. We often find in Anglo-Nor- man churches niches of various shapes over doors, most of them retaining the figures originally placed in them. The ornaments of the Anglo-Nonnan style consist principally of the different kinds of carved moiddings surrounding doors and windows, and used as tablets. The first and most frequent is the zigzag or chevron moulding, generally used in great profusion. The next most common or door-moulding is the beak- head moulding, consisting of heads of beasts or birds, whose tongues or beaks encircle the round. After these come many varieties, a good collection of which may be seen in the second part of Le Keux's Glossary of Architecture. The capitals of piers and shafts are often very rudely carved, in grotesque devices of animals and leaves. The crjq^t of York cathedral offers an example of these rude but rich capitals. There is one moulding, which is to be found very nearly of the same pattern and propor- tions over every part of England, viz. the moulding THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. 49 of the square abacus over the flowered or cut part of the capital. It consists of a broad fillet and hollow, which are separated by a little sunk channel, and it is sometimes continued as a tablet along the walls. The Anglo-Norman towers are generally very short and massive ; but they possess a certain rude gran- deur about them which is imposing. The cathe- drals of Norwich and Winchester, and Tewkesbury church, are fine specimens of Norman towers. They are generally plain, but sometimes ornamented by intersecting arches, and have usually the flat buttress ; that of St. Alban's runs into a round turret at each corner of the upper stage, and at St. Peter's, North- ampton, there is a singidar buttress of three parts of circles, but its date is uncertain. The nearest approach to a spire in this style of architecture, which we find in England, are the pyra- midal terminations of the large conical-headed pinna- cles at Rochester cathedral, and at St. Peter's-in- the-East, Oxford, and Cleve, Gloucestershire. The Anglo-Norman wooden roof appears in the most ancient specimens to have been left open to the actual timbers — the inclination of the braces forming a kind of arch, as at Ely cathedral. At Rochester and Winchester we see the open roof to this day ; but at Peterborough is a real flat boarded ceil- ing, in fine preservation, having lately been care- fully repainted from the original. It consists of a sort of rude mosaic, full of stiff lines, and its general division is into lozenges, with flowers of Norman character, the whole according in design with the ? 1 50 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. | ^1 i ornaments of that style. This kind of roof, particu- j larly when the exterior was covered with shingles, contributed much to spread those destructive fires we so frequently read of in the historj' of early churches. Of the Norman groined roof we have many fine examples. The greater part of the Norman west- fronts have been much changed by the introduction of windows of later date (mostly large perpendicular windows). The ruins of Lindisfarne (Northumber- land) however present us with one nearly perfect. This consists of a large door, with a gallery or tri- forium over it, of which some of the arches have been pierced through for windows, and above, one larger window. Rochester and Lincoln cathedrals. Castle Acre priory, and Tewkesbury church, all show what the Norman west-fronts were, with the exception of the introduction of the large window. There are a few large buildings with apses or semi- circular east ends ; Norwich and Peterborough cathedrals are fine specimens, but in both the windows are altered by the insertion of tracery, and, in parts, of new windows. The general appearance of Anglo-Norman build- ings is bold and massive. Very few large buildings remain without much alteration and mixture with other styles. Perhaps the naves of Peterborough and Rochester cathedrals present as little mixture as any, though in these the windows have been altered. Bar- freston in Kent, Stewkley in Bucks, and Adel in Yorkshire, offer smaller churches with very little alteration ; Tickencote, Rutlandshire, till within a few years, was one of the most valuable remains in the THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. 51 kingdom, but it has been rebuilt sufficiently near to its original to deceive many, and so far from it as to render it an imitation instead of a copy. The intenor arrangement of large Norman buildings is varied. Sometimes the large circular pier is used alone, as at Gloucester cathedral ; sometimes mixed with the pier composed of shafts, as at Durham; and sometimes of that pier and shafts only, as at Peterborough, Norwich, &:c. There are two buildings of the Anglo-Norman style worthy of particular attention, one for its sim- plicity and beauty of composition — the other from being unique, and also a fine specimen of ornament. The first is the vestibule or entrance to the Chapter- house, Bristol — the other, the staircase leading to the registry at Canterbury cathedral. I will close this Lecture with a list of the Nonnan churches in our own neighbourhood, first observing, that it is singular that in a district so early occupied by the Normans, we should find so few Norman churches, and such a preponderating number of Early English. In Sussex we find Chichester cathedral mentioned first, as being the mother church, for it is by no means to be called Anglo-Norman, the chief part of it being Early English. Part of the nave (the lower part of the walls) is Norman, and there is a consider- able mixture of Antjlo-Norman and Earlv English fonns and ornaments in some parts. — The church at Battle contains some Nornian piers, and die font is of mixed Nornian and Early English character. — Boxgrove contains Norman remains, especially a doorway, with three arches, opening into the cloister, E 2 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. which extended to the refectory of the monastery. — Clymping has a Norman tower. — St. Anne's and St. John's at Lewes have portions of Norman. — Rye ditto. — Shipley has a Norman tower, and several other parts of the same style. — New Shoreham has various portions of fine late Norman, running into Early English forms and details. This church is an excellent one for practical study, particularly when compared with its neighbours, Steyning and Old Shoreham. — Old Shoreham is also a cross church, with fine Norman arches to the tower, and various other Norman features ; it has, however, various inser- tions and mutilations. The font is circular and plain, standing on a circular pedestal. — Compting has Early English work, only just clear of Anglo-Norman, and an arch from the tower to the church, like rude Roman work. — Southwick church has a Norman tower, nave, and chancel, with windows of a later date inserted. — Steyning is a very curious Norman church, with a great variety of excellent and elabo- rate detail. — The churches of Alciston, Amberley, Beding, Bishopstone, Bramber, Burpham, Elsted, Jevington, Iping, Newhaven, North Marden, Tels- combe, Treyford, and Wilmington, have all Norman portions. — In Hants we find Winchester cathedral : the Norman parts are of a bold, simple character, and w^ell executed. The tower was built by Bishop Wakelyn, in the reign of William the Conqueror. The transept was also the work of this prelate, and remains yet in a firmer and securer state than any part of the building of later construction. To an THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. 53 architect there are few studies equal in vahie to this transept. It has been remarked, that the architects of the Anglo-Norman period, affecting loftiness in churches as well as length, were accustomed to pile arches and pillars on one another, sometimes to the height of three stories, as seen in Bishop Wakelyn's work, in this cathedral. They also imitated the three arches in the enrichment of plain walls, and by way of ornament and variety in the masonry, sometimes caused three plain round arches to intersect each other, as in the upper part of this southern transept, being probably the earliest instance of this interesting ornament to be met with in the kingdom. — The Hos- pital of St. Cross is a curious structure. The chapel is a cross church, having Norman characters, but sof- tened gradually into Early English, and at the west end even to a decorated character, by such easy steps as to form a valuable study. Some of the piers are circular, some clustered, some have Norman mould- ings, others Early English. The arches are mostly pointed ; but the eastern windows are chiefly Norman, with circular heads and zigzag ornament. There is a water-drain or piscina worth examination. — Christ Church, Twynan, is the priory church, and a magnificent structure. The nave is Norman. — Rom- sey church is large and curious ; its general exterior appearance is Norman ; so are the central portion and the transepts, with the sides of the clianceh Some portions of the Norman part are cnriclied with the zig- zag and otlier ornaments. — Corhampton, East Mcon, Porchester, Southampton, St. iMichael, and Warne- 54 THE ANGLO-NORMAN STYLE. ford with Shiilfleet, Whippingham, Wootton, and Yaverland, in the Isle of Wight. Norman fonts are particularly numerous; but as I mean to devote a Lecture to interior decorations^ I shall speak of fonts collectively in that. LECTURE IV. 1189—1307. " They dreamt not of a perishable home, Who thus could build." The Early English style of architecture is of extreme beauty, its compositions being always distinguished for their chaste simplicity and purity of design, and at the same time uniformly celebrated for the superior excellence of their workmanship ; it is decidedly preferable to the Anglo-Norman mode of building, and it has been well remarked, " that it cannot be justly regarded as inferior to either of the subsequent styles in light and elegant proportion, or in rich and elaborate detail." This style prevailed to the end of Edward the First's reign, and is distinguished by pointed arches, long narrow windows without mul- lions, called lancet, and a peculiar ornament, named, from its resemblance to the teeth of a shark, the 56 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. tooth ornament. As the Norman doorway is distin- guishable by the circular arch, so the Early English may be said to be always pointed. For though we find small interior doors of this style with flat tops, and the sides of the top supported by a quarter circle, yet the exterior ornamented doorways are universally pointed. The large doors of this style are often double, the two being divided by either one shaft, or several clustered, and a quatrefoil or other ornament over them. The recess of these doors is often as deep as the Norman, but the bands and shafts are more numerous, being smaller ; and in the hollow mouldings they are frequently enriched with the peculiar ornament of this style just now men- tioned, a singular toothed projection, which, when well executed, has a fine effect. But there are many doors of this style quite plain ; that of Christ Cliurch, Hants, is a good specimen. In our own neighbourhood we find numerous specimens, as most of the Sussex churches, especially those near us, are Early English. I recommend you to take a walk to-morrow, with a view to finding Early English doors and windows, and you will be sure to find specimens without going out of your usual rounds, whichever road you happen to take. I do not mean that you will find any ornamented doorways, for those about here are plain. At Oving, if you like to drive in that direction, you may find the tooth ornament. If you go a little farther, you will find a church vei*y valuable for study, Boxgrove. It is a part of an ancient priory, founded as early as 1100, by Robert de Haia (Lord PLATE IV. P. 5e. '^:?C EARLY ENGLISH. VTcattt-Li-ster. Crosby Eall. THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 5/ of Halnaker, in the reign of Henry I.) for three monks of the Benedictine order. Ceciha his daughter, her husband, and her sons, increased the number of the monks to fifteen, and added greatly to the domains of the priory. Henry VHI. frequently sold monastic property to the highest bidders, and many pious per- sons purchased conventual lands and churches, and instead of pulling down the sacred edifices for the sake of the materials, as was too generally done, permitted them to remain, as they were, for the celebration of divine service. Sir Thomas Pope pur- chased the conventual church of St. Alban's, Herts, and gave it to the parishioners ; in the same way Sir Thomas West, Lord La War, who possessed the lordship of Halnaker at the time of the Refor- mation, purchased tlie church of Boxgrove, and the goods and furniture of the priory. This gentle- man must have been anxious to preserve the church from destruction, as he had erected a sacellum or chapel in it in the year 1532. This chapel is wor- thy of examination, and indeed forms too striking an object to be passed over by the most unobservant eye. It is on the right hand, as one stands looking towards the altar, not far from it. It is composed of Caen stone, most elaborately carved, painted, and gilt. It is fourteen feet long and twelve high ; upon the columns you see the following inscription : — " Of yf^r charitie pray foi' y^ souls of Thomas La Ware, Sc Elizabeth His Wyf.' Thomas ! La ! War ! Anno Dni ! :mvxxxii. Elizabeth ! La ! War !" 58 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. It does not appear that this beautiful chapel, though often called a monument, was designed for a burial place. No doubt it was what the French call " Autel privilegie," erected to contain an altar, on which masses were to be offered up for the souls of Thomas and Elizabeth La War. You will find much at Boxgrove to interest you. There are remains of various eras, which will show you how one style blended into another. There you will see Norman arches, and doorways with pointed arches, and slender columns. There are sedilia on the south side of the altar, and several table tombs and other sepulchral monuments worthy of examina- tion. The present church consists of a nave and chancel, without division. These were anciently the choir. There are two aisles. The south transept is imperfect, and the north was ceiled with a flat timber frame, and otherwise altered in the reign of Henry VII. The roof is painted in the same style as the ante-room leading to the Lady chapel at Chichester cathedral. You will observe the tooth ornament used profusely in the vaulting. The dividing arcade is formed by low pointed arches, resting on circular pillars : above them is an ambulatory or gallery, through which the monks walked in procession. Light is admitted to this by open triforia, differing in point of style from those on the near transept, having an octangular pillar, of Sussex marble, with arches, and in the spandrel an open quatrefoil, under a circular moulding. The east window has three large lights, separated in the interior by tall marble shafts, and THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 59 flourished capitals. This mixture of ornamental parts is a proof that the structure is of the date of Henry I. Stephen, or Henry H. when the round Norman arch was abandoned, and several novelties intro- duced, which prevailed but a short time, and are to be met witli only in a few instances. I have been thus particular in describing Boxgrove church, to show you what to look for, and also to try whether you are familiar with the technical terms. And now to return to the Early English style. Fine specimens of enriched Early English doorways remain at York, Lincoln, Chichester, and Salisbury, and Beverley Minster has one of great beauty. Lichfield cathedral presents a door curious for its resemblance to some foreign cathedrals : it is placed in a shallow porch, formed in the thickness of the wall, the arch of which is richly feathered, and otherwise ornamented ; the interior aperture is divided into two doorways by a pier of shafts, and this pier, as well as the side piers, has a statue resting on a corbel, and crowned with a canopy. The recess is groined, and the whole is worked with great delicacy, and is full of rich orna- ment. The doors appear original, and are covered with beautiful ramifications of scroll work in iron. The Early English windoivs are almost universally long, narrow, and lancet-headed, generally without feathering, but in some instances trefoiled. The pure lancet window is of very graceful proportions, and does not require the aid of enrichment, although, in the later examples, the head is often decorated with a small and delicate trefoil ; the sides also in 60 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. ricli buildings are frequently ornamented with slen- der detached shafts, sometimes divided by projecting bands. The architects of the middle ages never introduced the wide lancet windows, excepting in cathedrals and such vast fabrics, where their great size appears in unison with the bold character of the buttresses, but they are altogether unfit for small paro- chial churches, for which the long narrow windows are admirably adapted, more particularly in the absence of stained glass, since they do not admit too much light, and consequently preserve to the interior of the sacred edifice a quiet and solemn aspect, which is very impressive. Two, three, and five of these windows are occasionally, in large buildings, grouped together, the divisions between them being often so trifling, that the combination has very much the appearance of one window with several bays. In the north transept of York cathedral, there is a beautiful window of five lights, called the five sisters, from a tradition that the stained glass with which it is adorned, was the gift of five maiden sisters. Though they are in reality five distinct lancet windows, the slender dimensions of the shafts which separate them give them somewhat the appearance of one large window, divided by mullions ; and one can easily fancy a decorated window suggesting itself to the mind of a designer, whilst looking at the five sis- ters. These windows are nearly fifty feet high, and from six to eight feet wide, and have a very beau- tiful effect. Surely, no lady of the nineteenth cen- tury can look upon this monument of the munificence THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 61 and taste of the five sisters of York, without confess- ing with shame, that in spite of all our boasted supe- riority of education and refinement, we are far below the ladies of " the dark ages " in some points. Windows formed within the lines of a spherical equi- lateral triangle light the triforium over the vault- ings of the aisles of the north transept of the abbey church of St. Peter, at Westminster. We find them also in the clerestory of Lichfield cathedral, in the Abbot's Barn at Glastonbury, and in the south tran- sept of York Minster. The circular windows of this period are very fine. The examples at York, Lincoln, and Beverley, are most imposing. Those in the gables of the west front of Peterborough cathedral are of smaller dimensions ; but their composition is excellent, and they afford models for imitation, which are particularly applicable for ordinary sized churches. The window of two lights under one arch, having an open circle or quatrefoil in the head, was very frequently used in Early English buildings, during the latter part of the thirteenth century : there is a good plain specimen at Cotterstock, Northampton, and there are others of a more ornate character at Westminster abbey, and Stone church, Kent. The stained glass of this period was very elegant. There are two distin- guishing marks of Early English piers ; first, the division by bands of the shafts which compose them, and secondly, the arrangement of these shafts for the most part in a circle. At Salisbury and Westminster we find the surrounding shafts few in number, set 62 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. round a large circular one. At Lincoln and York we find them so numerous as nearly to hide the central shaft; there are a few, as in the choir at Chester, which come very near the appearance of decorated piers. There is an uncommon pier at Beverley Minster, and in a few other churches. It consists of shafts, some of which are plain round, others filleted round, and some whose plan is a spherical triangle, with the edge outwards. At Runcorn church, Che- shire, is a pier, consisting of four of these triangular shafts, with a flowered capital, which has a good effect. The capitals of these shafts are various ; in many they are plain, consisting of a bell, with a moulding under it, and a sort of capping, with more mouldings above. The dividing bands are formed of annulets and fillets, and are often continued under windows, &c. as tablets. A richer capital, with leaves, is sometimes used, as at York and at Lincoln. The plain multangular pier, with a plain capital, of a few simple mouldings, and a plain sloped arch, is sometimes very puzzling, and it requires much dis- crimination to refer such piers to their proper date. In general, the capitals and bases will carry in their character sufficient marks to determine their date, except in the transition from Early English to Deco- rated. The buttress most commonly used in the Early English edifices either had its edges chamfered, or small shafts inserted at the exterior angles. It was often divided into two or more stages, and was finished generally with a triangular head, surmounted by a small cross or flower, which, in the later build- THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. G3 ings of this style, assumed the form of a plain pin- nacle, as at Westminster abbey. What is called the Flying Buttress arose at this period. Salisbury, Chi- chester, and Exeter, afford examples of the flying buttress. It is so called, because it is arched or detached, and has a suspended appearance. It pos- sesses great lightness. When I first saw Notre Dame de Paris, the flying buttresses of that noble church brought Exeter cathedral strongly to my memory. The Early English cornice is sometim.es rich in mould- ings, and often with an upper slope, making the face of the parapet perpendicular to the wall below. There are cornices of this style still, resembling the Norman parapet, but they consist of several mould- ings. The hollow moulding of the cornice is generally plain, seldom containing flowers or carvings, except the tooth ornament ; but under the m.ouldings there is often a series of small arches resembhng the corbel table. The dripstone of this style is various, some- times of several mouldings. In some buildings the dripstone is returned, and runs as a tablet along the walls. We find bands of trefoils, &c. : in large build- ings, a sort of canopy is used occasionally over some of the niches of this style, but it is not found over doors or windows. In buildings where they are found, they appear to be additions. The most im- portant niches in Early English buildings are the sedilia and piscinae in the southern wall of the chan- cel. Early English steeples are much more lofty than the Norman, and on the tower the architects of this period placed that beautiful addition, the spire. 64 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. Some of our finest spires are of this age. That of Chichester is clearly of this character, and Salisbury spire, though not erected till within the period of the Decorated Style, is yet in its composition completely of Early English character, though its ornaments are more advanced. In beauty of pro- portion it is unrivalled. There is a sentiment about the " heaven-y-pointing spire," which will always render it dear to a Christian. The humblest vil- lage spire possesses grace and beauty. Though I ought to except one spire that T see by your faces is rising to the mind's eye of each. I must confess that the spire you are thinking of is clumsy, and ill-pro- portioned in design, and that the unlucky inclination it has taken to one side, gives it an air of deformity, and makes it irresistibly ludicrous when seen from some points near at hand. Still even that unfortunate spire has a pretty effect, rising from the midst of trees, seen at the distance of a mile from the fields near the bridge. Chichester spire is certainly fine, but I cannot but consider it very inferior to that of Salisbury. Salisbury spire produces a singular effect on the mind ; there is a poetry about it, a har- mony and perfection which seems unearthly ; it rises towards the clouds as if it longed to fly heavenwards, and lifts the soul of the beholder to the unseen world. The towers of this age are usually flanked by octa- gonal turrets, or square buttresses, and in most in- stances the details are particularly excellent. The tower of St. Mary's, Stamford, in Lincolnshire, and that erected over the north-west transept of Peter- THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 65 borough cathedral, are admirably designed. There is a beautiful bell turret in this style at Glastonbury : it has two arched openings, over which a trefoil- headed niche, inclosing a small figure, is very happily introduced, and the whole composition is charac- terized by much richness and simplicity. There is another at Shipton OUifFe, Gloucestershire. During the whole of this style the Parapet, in many places plain, in others ornamented, continued to be used. Perhaps some of the earliest battlement is that at the west end of Salisbury cathedral. There is a greater variety in the Early English fronts, than in those of any other style. The west front of Salisbury is the finest, but the transept ends of Salisbury, York, and Beverley, are very fine, and all different in com- position. The ruins of Tynemouth priory, Valle Crucis, Byland, and Whitby abbeys, all exhibit the remains of excellent work. Of the smaller works, the east end of the Lady chapel, Salisbury, the ex- treme east end of Hereford cathedral ; and the north transept of Headon church, near Hull, deserve atten- tion ; so does the west front of Lincoln. The old Norman front is encompassed by Early English, and a large feathered circle over the great door possesses singular beauty. The west front of Peterborough is quite different from all the rest. It is enriched with a profusion of the tooth ornament. This ornament, one of the principal characteristics of the st}'le, is not easily described or drawn. It appears to be the regular progression from the Norman zigzag to the delicate four-leaved flowers, so common in decorated 66 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. English buildings. Like the zigzag, it is generally straight-sided, and not round, like the leaves of a flower, though, at a distance in front, it looks some- thing like a small flower. It may be described as a succession of low square pyramids pierced and set on the edges of a hollow moulding. This enrich- ment is difficult to execute, but when well sculptured has an exquisite effect : in the late buildings of this date, the surfaces of the walls of the choir or chancel are often covered with diaper-work, a succession of squares inclosing four-leaved flowers, a most delicate and elegant decoration, admirably adapted for the pannels of an altar-screen. Early English foliage may be distinguished by the leaves curling in a peculiarly free and graceful man- ner. Whenever we find crockets and finials, they are bold and plain ; when richly carved, they belong to the two succeeding styles of Gothic architecture. At Beaulieu abbey, Hants, there is a curious and beau- tiful stone pulpit of this era. Early English fonts are rarely to be met with, and are only to be distinguished from those of the later Anglo-Norman period by their characteristic mould- ings and other ornaments. The roof of the nave of Salisbury cathedral presents the best specimen of Early English Groined Roof: it has cross springers, and the rib from pier to pier ; but it has no rib running longitudinally or across at the point of the arches. The cloisters at Chester and Lichfield cathe- dral offer very fine specimens of Early English groin- ing. There do not appear to be any Early English THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. wooden roofs wliich can clearly be distinguished to be such. Early English Porches are in general larger than Norman ones. The north porch of Salisbury cath- edral, and the south porch at Lincoln, are good specimens. The general appearance of Early English building is magnificent and rich, rather from the number of the parts than from its details. In those buildings where very long windows are used, there is a gran- deur arising from the height of the divisions : in smaller buildings there is much simplicity of appear- ance, and there is a remarkable evenness in the value of the workmanship. In the other styles we often find work which is evidently the copy, by an inferior hand, of fine workmanship elsewhere, but in Early English work all appears well designed and carefully executed. AVe liave the advantage of possessing one large building of the Early English style, worked in its best manner, and in excellent preservation. This is Salisbury cadiedral, and it gives a high idea of the great improvement of this style on the Anglo-Nor- man, magnificent yet simple, equally removed from rudeness and meretricious ornament ; it forms a uni- foiTTi whole, full of grace and harmony. The west front is ornamented, but by no means loaded with decoration, and the north side is perhaps equal to the side of any cathedral in England. The west front of Lincoln is fine, but the old Norman front is too visible, not to break it into parts. Peterborough and Ely have perliaps tlie most ornamented fronts of thi: F 2 68 THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. Style. As interiors, after Salisbury, the transepts of York may be reckoned the best specimens. In the interior arrangement we find the triforium a very prominent feature ; it is large in proportion to the work above and below it, and is generally the most ornamented part of the work. In small churches the triforium is generally omitted. The triforium is a sort of gallery over the aisles, or a range of arches, resting on the principal arcade, which stands on the ground. Above it we generally find another range with windows, called the clerestory. At Norwich we find the triforium of great height, and composed of arches and pillars nearly as high as those on which they stand. At Exeter, the triforium is very low, and the clerestory above of equally extraordinary height. Early English staircases (except round ones in towers) are not common. There is one of rich cha- racter at Beverley ]Minster, leading from the north aisle of the choir to some adjacent building. There is another in the refectory (now a grammar-school) at Chester, leading up to a large niche or sort of pulpit for the reader. It is one of the monastic rules that some edifying book should be read aloud during meals. Nicholas Ferrar, one of the holiest members of our Church, introduced this rule into the monastic institution which he founded at Little Gidding, in H untingdonshi re . Whilst speaking of this style, I must not forget to mention the beautiful crosses erected by king Ed- ward I. to the memory of queen Eleanor. One at THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 69 Geddington, Northamptonshire, is plain; but those of Northampton and Waltham are peculiarly rich, and of elegant composition. There is enough orna- ment to give them a claim to be classed in the Decorated style ; but still there is enough of Early English character to mark their date. If the transition from Norman to Early English was gradual, the change of Early English into Deco- rated was still more so. We have several curious examples of this transition on a large scale. West- minster abbey, though carried on for a long time, was carefully continued in the original style, but the cloisters show gradation. Ely cathedral possesses a pure and perfect specimen of each of the three successive styles of Gothic architecture, pure as being free from all transition mixture, and perfect as to the design and execution of the detail. The Galilee and Presbytery were built when the Early English style was settled and perfected ; the octagon, the three arches east of it, and the Lady chapel, when the Decorated English was in its zenith; and Bishop Alcock's chapel, when the Perpendicular style had reached the height of perfection. (Sarin fi?ngli&f) Ctiuvcfjcs of Sussex. The whole of Chichester cathedral, except the lower part of the walls of the nave, which are Norman, and the two additional naves, which are decorated, having been added early in Edward the Third's reign. THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. Bosham : an Early English church without much mixture ; it has a tower and spire, nave and south aisle, and large chancel, which has double lancets at the sides, and five lancets on the east window. — East- bourne : a large church, with a clerestory, a massive tower, and some insertions of late date. — Boxgrove : the remains of a large cross church, with a low tower; nave nearly destroyed, choir and transepts form the present church. It has bold flying buttresses and some decorated windows. The nave had Norman piers with pointed arches. — Chiddingly has a hand- some tower and spire, partly Early English ; church of later date, and poor composition. — Clymping, a very curious church, with good lancet windows. It has a Norman tower at the end of the south transept. — Finden : mostly Early English, with a Decorated east window. — West Grinstead: partly Early English, partly Decorated, and has a Perpendicular wooden porch. — Heathfield: spire most Early English, Deco- rated east window, and quatrefoils for clerestory win- dows. — West Hoathly : lofty spire. Early English nave, and Decorated chancel. — St. Anne's and aS'^. John's^ at Lewes^ have Early English portions. — Oving church : Early English, with some Decorated and Perpendicular windows inserted. — Rye : large and curious cross church ; part of the choir Early English, and fine lancet windows. — New Shoreham : transi- tion character. — Sompting : very curious tower, cross church, mostly Early English, just clear of Norman. The tower is valuable, as it is clearly one of the early works described as long and short work : it links THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 71 witli Whittingliam in Northumberland, and Barton- on-the-Humber, but has curious parts different from either. — Sonthease : circular tower, mostly Early English. — Sonthwick has an Early English belfry story on a Norman tower. Winchelsea is but the eastern portion of a very fine chvu'ch, principally of Early English and Deco- rated character, with excellent details. On the south side are two monuments, three stalls, and a water- drain or piscina ; and on the north-side, several monu- ments : all of the richest design and execution. — South Bursted : nave and two aisles, cylindrical and multangidar piers, pointed arches of a double order, and lancet windows. The whole body has been badly rebuilt, and the spire is crooked. There is a piscina and something like the vestiges of sedilia. — Felpham : tower square, with some PerpcndicuLar work ; some Decorated windows, the rest Early English ; piscina and credence, a very large old font, very early Nor- man, or perhaps Saxon. The old open oak sittings remain. — Yapton : nave and two aisles divided by a double arcade alternately round and octangular, with capitals in foliage of the style prevalent in Henry the Third's reign. At the west end is a low tower, covered with ivy, and very venerable and picturesque- looking, seen from the road. Chancel rebuilt and modernized. The church was ceiled in 1726. Gal- lery at west end erected in 1730. The additions and improvements of tlie last century are generally of very different character from those of " the dark ages." The font is of black granite, and certainly of great THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. antiquity. — Pagham : a very beautiful cross church, lately restored with great taste and liberality by the rector. The transepts resemble the chancel, with three lancet windows in each. The altar is of black marble, with a white cross inlaid in front. The sanctuary is paved with marble, and the double piscina is care- fully preserved. There is some fine stained glass in the east window, and also in a small window opposite the entrance door, beneath which the font is placed. The subject is the Baptism of our Lord, and nothing can have a finer effect than the curious old Purbeck marble font, certainly a Saxon relic, surmounted by this appropriate and beautiful window. The pews in the nave have been removed, and open sittings substituted for them \ In the vestry are two gigantic brass candlesticks, which we may hope will be one day placed on either side of the altar they are so admirably suited for. — North Mundham : probably built at the expense of the priory of Box- grove, in the reign of Edward III. ; two side aisles, pointed arches, and round pillars. There are some interesting tombs and inscriptions. — Slindon : consist- ing of a nave and two aisles. In the chancel under a niche is the figure of a man, carved in Irish oak, in the armour of Henry the Eighth's time, with his head ^ As far as picturesque effect is concerned, the open seats at Pagham are an improvement on the old style of pewing ; but the retention of a certain number of pews, prevents the worst evil of the old system, (viz, making worldly distinctions between rich and poor in the house of God,) from being re- moved by the partial adoption of open seats. THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. 73 bare, and resting on his helmet. — Eastergate : chancel ancient ; two lancets on the south side, and a good Perpendicular window over the altar. Some stained glass in a window in the nave. Part of the well- finished wooden king-post roof remains ; the rest rude. — Selsey, the ancient bishop's see, removed to Chi- chester by Stigand, chaplain to William the First. No remains of the ancient cathedral. The present church is said to have been built by Bishop Reade in the latter part of the fourteenth century. Nave and two aisles. Oak roof in excellent preservation, and the ancient seats. Very ancient font, perhaps the very one from which St. Wilfrid administered the Sacrament of Baptism to our Saxon forefathers. — Oving (described before). — Mertsham : very small, one aisle with pointed arches, with chamfered edges, low cylindrical columns, with bases apparently an- cient, lancet windows, a per])endicular piscina, and an early Norman font. — Aldinghourne : remains of lancets in the tower ; semi-circular arch leading into the south aisle, with perfect Early English mouldings, and the tooth ornament, which also occurs in the aisle, beautifully executed. Large old font. — Apple- drum, Barcombe, Barlavington, Bamham, Bepton, West Bletchington, Bodiham, Bolney, St. Botolph's, Bury, Chailcy, Cliiltington, Chithurst, Coates, Combes, Didling, Donnington, Fairlight, Farnhurst, Ferring, Fishbourn, Fletching, Goreing, Greetham, Hangleton, Hellingly, Hardham, Hove, Hollington, East Hoathly, Horsham, Hunston, Hurstmonceaux, West Itchenor, Icklesham, Iford, Keymcr, Mid Lavant, Linchmere, THE EARLY ENGLISH STYLE. Ludgershall, Madehiirst, North Stoke, Ovingdean, Paching, Peacemarsh, Pevensey, Playden, Pidinghoe, Plumpton, Portslade, Preston, Rogate, Rottingdean, Rusper, Ruslington, Sellham, Sidlesham, Selmerton, Stedham, South Stoke, West Stoke, Stoughton, Tang- mere, Tarring Neville, West Tarring, Teswick, West Thorney, Tortington, Udimere, Westfield, Washing- ton, Westmerton, Wisborough Green, West Withing, Wivelsfield, are all Early English churches. I ought to include Netley Abbey among the Early English LECTURE V. 1307—1377. This style prevailed little more than seventy years, and is peculiar to the reigns of our second and third Edwards. It is very rich and beautiful, without being overloaded with ornament, and forms, as it were, a link that connects the simple and severe architecture of Early English fabrics with that florid mode of building which was adopted in the fifteenth century. The equilateral arch was most commonly adopted at this period, and it is of very graceful pro- portions. The doors and porches very much resemble those of the preceding style, the difference mainly consisting in the peculiar form of the mouldings and their enrichments : the ornament, resembling a ball within the leaves of a flower, is often inserted in the hollows, with considerable intervals between, and has an excellent effect. Lichfield cadiedral and tlie Nor- wich school-house have very beautiful examples of doors, covered with iron scroll-work. The shafts, 76 THE DECORATED STYLE. instead of standing free, are generally parts of the sweep of the mouldings, and instead of being cut and set up lengthways, all the mouldings and shafts are cut on the arch-stone, thus combining great strength with all the appearance of lightness. The capitals of these shafts differ from the Early English, in being formed of a woven foliage, and not of upright leaves ; this in small shafts has an apparent neck, but in larger ones often appears like a ball of open foliage. There are also plain capitals. — Exeter cathedral and Norwich cloisters afford fine specimens. The doors in general are not so deeply recessed as the Norman and Early English, yet in many large buildings they are very deep. The west doors of York are of the richest execution and of considerable depth. To the open work bands of the last style, succeeds an ornament equally beautiful, and less fragile, viz. the flowered moulding ; and the tooth ornament is ex- changed for an ornament almost as peculiar to the Decorated style, as its predecessor is to the Early English. This is a small round bud of three or four leaves, which open just enough to show a ball in the centre ; this is generally placed in a hollow moulding, and has a beautiful effect. A four-leaved flower also, in a hollow moulding, is used in some buildings, in great profusion. Sometimes heads and figures are introduced in these mouldings. The doors have various canopies. The dripstone is generally supported by a corbel, which is commonly a head. The common canopy is a triangle : the space between it and the dripstone is filled with tracery, and the exterior THE DECORATED STYLE. t t ornamented with crockets, and crowned with a finial. Tlie second canopy is the ogee, which runs about half-way up the dripstone, and then is turned the contrary way, and is finished in a straight line run- ning up into a finial. This has much tracery, and is crocketed. An arch, doubly foliated, running over the door, is sometimes used as a canopy, but is not common. In small churches we often find doors nearly plain. In some doors of this style, a series of niches with statues is carried up, like a hollow moulding ; and in others doubly foliated tracery, standing free from one of the outer mouldings, gives great richness. The south door of Lincoln, and a door in the cloisters of Norwich, are fine speci- mens. The clearest marks of the Decorated style are to be found in the windows. They are usually large and wide, divided into several lights by mul- lions ; but the horizontal bar, or transom, was not often introduced in ecclesiastical buildings previous to the Perpendicular style, excepting in spire-lights, of which there is an example at Witney, Oxon, as early as the middle of the thirteenth century. The tracery of Decorated work is of extreme beauty, and is either composed of circles and other geometrical figures, or of a flowing pattern, which is usual in the later exam- ples. The great east window of Carlisle cathedral is the finest specimen in the kingdom. The great win- dow you have all seen in the south transept of Chi- chester cathedral is Decorated, and possesses great beauty, though it is not equal to the window of the same date at Merton college. In small churches 78 THE DECORATED STYLE. windows of two or three lights are common, but in larger edifices we find four or five lights for the aisles and clerestory windows, five or six for transepts and the end of aisles, and in the east and west windows seven, eight, and even nine lights are used. The west window of York contains eight lights, as does the east window of Lincoln : the west window of Exeter, and the splendid east window of Carlisle, have nine. There are two kinds of tracery, (jeome- trical, containing figures, such as circles, trefoils, &c. touching only at points, and Jloiving, where the mould- ings flow into patterns of great delicacy and intricacy. The windows at Exeter, and those of the nave at York, are specimens of the geometrical. York Min- ster, Beverley Minster, Newark church, and many other northern as well as some southern churches, contain beautiful specimens of the flowing style. There is a beautiful modern window at St. Peter's church, Brighton, with flowing tracery ; indeed, the greater part of that fine church offers much consola- tion to the eye of a lover of architecture accustomed to mourn over the unchurch-like and generally un- sightly buildings which usually disfigure our great towns under the name of modern churches. Cer- tainly we can name some bright exceptions, and a better taste is fast springing up among us, and I hope we may add, a better spirit and greater willingness to offer of the best to Him who gave us all. But to return : a new disposition of shafts marks the Deco- rated style in large buildings. They are arranged diagonally, or diamond- wise, often containing as many THE DECORATED STYLE. 79 sliafts as will stand close to each other at the capital, and only a fillet or small hollow between them. The shaft, which runs up to support the roof, often springs from a rich corbel between the outer archi- trave mouldings of the arches. Exeter and Ely are fine examples. There are other piers, as that rich one at York, where the centre shaft is larger than those on each side, and the three all run through to the spring of the roof. In small country churches the flat-faced multangular pier was used. Buttresses are various, all more or less worked in stages, and the set-offs ornamented. Of rich buttresses examples may be found in the west front of York Minster, and also in the ruins of Howden church, Yorkshire, and the priory at Walsingham, Norfolk. This last is very late, and it seems doubtful whether it might not be classed as Perpendicular. The equilateral arch is not so distinguishing a mark of the Decorated style, as the arches of the two preceding styles are of theirs. At Ely a drop arch is used. The dis- tinction between the multiplied Early English mould- ings and the bold Decorated ones, may be well observed at Chester, where the arch between the choir and Lady chapel is very good Early English, and the arches of the nave are. good Decorated work; and these two also show the difference of character of the two kinds of pier. Decorated niches fomi one great beauty of the style. They are either pan- nelled, having the fronts of canopies even with the face of the wall or buttress they are set to, or they have projecting canopies. These are of various shapes ; 80 THE DECORATED STYLE. some like several triangular canopies joined at the edges, and some with ogee heads. There were also in the latter part of this style some instances of the niche, with a flat-headed canopy, which became so common in the next style. The chancel stalls of this style are often very rich. The most remarkable distinction between the Decorated style and the florid Perpendicular is, that in the former, ornament is used as an accessary ; in the latter, it fonns part of the composition of the building. Though ornament is often profusely used in the earlier style (as its very name of " Decorated " shows), yet these ornaments are like Grecian enrichments, which may be left out without destroying the grand design of the building. In the later style the ornaments are more generally a minute division of parts of the building, as pannels, buttresses, &c. than the mere external ornament of sculpture. In some of the more magnificent Decorated works, a variety of flowered carvings is used all over, and yet the building does not look overloaded, while some of the late Perpendicular buildings, having much less flowered carvings, look burdened with ornament, from the fatiguing recurrence of minute parts, which prevent the comprehension of the general design. But this I shall explain more fully when I define the next style. I have already described the ornaments peculiar to the Decorated style. It is seldom safe to judge of date solely by the character of the ornamental carv- ings, yet in many instances there will be very clear distinctions. It is difficult to describe in words the THE DECORATED STYLE. 81 different characters of Early English, and Decorated foliage, yet any one who attentively examines a few examples of each style, will be seldom mistaken afterwards, unless in buildings so completely transi- tional as to have almost every mark of both styles. The Early EngUsh foliage is bold and regular in form ; the Decorated leaves have a crumpled appearance more resembhng nature. In the cathedrals of York and Ely, the student may find excellent examples of each style, but for the present moment I must refer you to the plate. At the commencement of this style, several fine spires were added to towers then existing, and in after-times many very fine towers and spires were erected. Grantham, Newark, and several other Lin- colnshire spires are very fine. These are generally flanked with buttresses, and crowned with fine pinna- cles. Newark spire deserves particular attention. The lower parts are Early English, but it is the upper story of the tower and spire which are its chief beau- ties. There are many small towers and spires which appear to be Decorated ; but there are so many of them altered, and with appearances so much like the next style, that they require more than common examina- tion before they are pronounced absolutely Decorated; and Mr. Rickman says, he has not been able to find any rich, ornamented tower of large size remain- ing, that is a pure Decorated building. The west towers of York Minster come the nearest to purity, though the tracery of the belfry windows and the battlements are decidedly Perpendicular. 82 THE DECORATED STYLE. A parapet continues frequently to be used in the Decorated style, but it is often pierced in various shapes, of which quatrefoils, in circles, or without that inclosure, are very common: but another, less common, possesses great beauty ; this is a waved line, the spaces of wliich are trefoiled. It is well executed at the church of St. Mary Magdalene, at Oxford. There are very few Decorated porches remaining, but under this head I must notice three beautiful gates, which are in some degree assimilated to porches. These are, the gates of the abbey at Bury St. Edmund's, of Thornton abbey, Lincolnshire ; and of St. Augustine's monastery, Canterbury. They have all rich and beautifully ornamented gateways, with rooms over them, and their fronts ornamented with niches, windows, &:c. The general appearance of Decorated buildings is at once simple and magnifi- cent ; simple from the small number of parts, and magnificent from the size of the windows, the easy flow of the lines of tracery, and the elegance of its ornament. In the interior of large buildings we find great breadth, and an enlargement of the clerestory windows, with a corresponding diminution of the triforium, which is now rather a part of the clere- story opening than a distinct member of the division. The roofing, from the increased richness of the groin- ing, becomes an object of attention. The Decorated groined roof is an increase on the last style in the number of ribs ; those of the simplest kind consisted of the longitudinal and crossing rib, at the point of the arches, with the cross-springers and pier rib, and & THE DECORATED STYLE. 83 an intermediate rib between them and the wall arch. These ribs, increased in number, and adorned with small ribs, forming, by their intersection, stars and other figures, give a variety to the groining almost equal to the tracery of windows. The roof over York Minster is admirably designed, and has an appearance of grandeur and simplicity, on account of the shafts from which the moulded ribs radiate, ascending direct from the floor without any hori- zontal interruption. There remain a few roofs, which appear to be of Decorated character, that are open to the roof framing, and have a sort of pannelled work in ogee quatrefoils in timber, between the principals, which have arched ornamental work. Of this kind is the roof of Eltham palace. The east fronts of Decorated buildings consist so often of one large window for the chancel or choir, and two smaller ones for the aisles, if there be any, that little need be said of their com- position, as its variation depends on the variety of buttresses. Sec. used as finishings. The east ends of Lincoln and Carlisle cathedrals are examples. The east end of Lichfield cathedral is a semi-hexagon, with very fine long windows of rich tracery. This is late in the style, and seems to have been much repaired at a still later period. The west front of York has been called the finest in England. The three doors are splendid specimens of Decorated doors. The east end of Trinity church, Hull, deserves attention ; the windows are very fine, but the centre one has a trace of Perpendicular work in it. Though we have not the advantage of possessing any one 84 THE DECORATED STYLE. large building of this style in its pure state, like Salisbury cathedral, which offers so perfect a speci- men of the Early English style, yet we have the advantage of four beautiful models in the highest preservation. These are at Lincoln, Exeter, York, and Ely, and, though differently worked, are all of excellent execution. Of these, Exeter and York are far the largest, and York, from the grandeur and simplicity of the design, is certainly the finest. Orna- ment is lavished on it, yet there is a simplicity that charms. Lincoln is assimilated to the Early English work about it, and Ely has, from the same necessity of considering former work, a larger triforium than common ; though not so bold in its composition as the nave of York, the work at Ely is valuable for the beauty and delicacy of its details. Among the many smaller churches, the church of the Holy Trinity, at Hull, deserves peculiar notice, from its Decorated parts being of a character which could be well imitated in modem work, from the great height of the piers, and the smallness of their size. The remains of Melrose are very rich, and, though in niins, its parts are clearly distinguishable. Li imitations of this style, great care is required to prevent its running into the next, which, from its straight perpendicidar and horizontal lines, is so much more easily worked. There are many good fonts of this style remaining, though they are less numerous than Norman and Perpendicular fonts. At Luton, Bedfordshire, there is a beautiful baptis- tery. As an example of transition from this style to the next, the choir of York may be cited. The THE DECORATED STYLE. piers and arches retain the same form as in the Deco- rated work in the nave ; but the windows, the screens, and above all, the east end, are clearly Perpendicular. In the stained glass of this period, the openings of the windows were generally occupied by one figure only, an effigy of the patron saint or benefactor. Heraldry had made great advances, and the laws by which heraldic colours are contrasted, invariably pro- duce a full and perfect effect on stained glass \ Hist of Decoratcti (!Ii)urci^es in Sussex. Chichester cathedral contains a splendid Decorated w^indow in the south transept. The windows of the side chapels of the nave, added in the time of Edward III., are of early Decorated work, but very plain ex- amples of the style. — Boxcjrove has some Decorated windows. — St. Nicholas, Brighton, has some Decorated parts. — Etchingham has Decorated work in the tower. — Finden : Decorated east window. — Firle : good De- corated windows, but some later, with modem inser- tions. — West G r instead : partly Decorated. — Heath- field : Decorated east window, and quatrefoils for ^ Many persons object to armorial bearings, on the ground that they are of a worldly character ; but as long as they are kept in a subordinate place, I do not see any force in the objection. Even when they are made to usurp the places originally assigned to saints and martyrs, they are far less shocking to many minds, than the general custom of placing the Royal arms where the image of our blessed Redeemer once stood. 86 THE DECORATED STYLE. clerestory windows. — West Hoathley: Decorated chan- cel. — Kingston: small plain church of good Decorated character, with some handsome doors and windows. — Oving : Decorated windows inserted. — Sompting : re- mains of a side chapel of the Decorated style. — Wal- tham : windows with trefoiled heads ; but they may be insertions. — Winchehea : parts of early Decorated character. The churches in the following list have an admix- ture of Decorated portions, with the Early English ; sometimes merely one or two windows, sometimes with a little Perpendicular work : — Arlington, Ashurst, Beckley, Bodingham, Bignor, Broadwater, East Bletchington, Burwash, Buxted, Catsfield, Cocking, Compton, Denton, Ditchling, Earnley, Eartham, Eastergate, Ewhurst, Felpham, Fittleworth, Frampfield, Frant, Graffliam, Hartfield, Harting, Horsted Keynes, I field, Merston, Newick, Northiam, Patcham, Salehurst, Stopham, Street, Sut- ton, Wadhurst, Waldron, Woodmancoat. The following churches are of Decorated character, some of them with but little admixture : — Ardingley, Ashburnham, Berwick, Chalvington, Ford, Isfield, North Chapel, Nuthurst, Petworth, Seaford, Slaugham, Tillington, Trotton, Cold Wal- tham, Wiston. The churches of Alfriston, Ashing- ton, Crawley, Heyshot, Lindfield, Poynings, and Rype, have an admixture of the Decorated and Per- pendicular styles. THE DECORATED STYLE. The ruins of Mayfield Palace, once the seat of the Archbishops of Canterbury, afford fine specimens of domestic Decorated work. The entrance-gate and some other portions of Battle Ahhey are of Decorated character, with excellent details. Decovatctr Cf)uvcf)cs of f^ants. Winchester Cathedral : there is not much Decorated work ; the old screen at the back of the space behind the altar-screen is excellent Decorated work. — The Hospital of St. Cross: west end early Decorated. — Rornsey : windows at the east end, evidently inserted, very fine ones, with early Decorated tracery. — Cornp- ton. — Soherton. LECTURE VI. CJe letjpcntdcular Stele, 1377—1546. " Full many a bard hath sung the solemn gloom Of the long Gothic aisle and stone-ribb'd roof, O'er-canopying shrine and gorgeous tomb, Carved screen, and altar glimmering far aloof, And blending with the shade — a matchless proof Of high devotion, which hath now waxed cold." Walter Scott. The Perpendicular Gothic is a style almost peculiar to this country, and in its earlier specimens possesses much of the richness and elegant simplicity of the preceding period ; but in the later examples a lavish display of intricate and minute ornaments was often carried to such an excess, as eventually to be destruc- tive of all the solemn character and beauty of Pointed Architecture. The Perpendicular style prevailed about one hundred and sixty-nine years, beginning in the reign of Richard II. and continuing till the reign of THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 89 Henry VIII. It is true there are examples of it, used as additions and repairs as late as 1630 or 1640, but the style is then much debased. Few if any whole buildings were executed in this style later than Henry Vlllth's time. The four-centred Tudor arch is almost invariably used in the later structures of this era, but its appearance is inferior to that of the simple pointed form, which was often adopted in the earlier edifices. The massive round Anglo- Norman pier, lessened in size and extended in length, with shafts set round it, became the Early English pier ; the shafts were multiplied, and set into the face of the pier, which became, in its place, lozenge, and formed the Decorated pier. We now find the pier altering in shape again, becoming much thinner be- tween the arches, and larger from the nave to the aisle. This is managed by having those shafts, which run to the roof to support the springings of the groins, added in front, and not forming a part of the miouldings of the arch, but having a bold hollow between them. This is very apparent at King's Col- lege Chapel, Cambridge, St. George's, Windsor, and Henry Vllth's Chapel, the three great models of the enriched Perpendicular style ; but it is observ- able in a less degree in many other buildings. In small churches, the pier mentioned in the last style is much used ; but many small churches have humble imitations of the magnificent arrangement of shafts and mouldings just mentioned. There are still some plain octagonal. Sec. piers in small churches which may belong to this age. The great distinction of Perpen- 90 THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. dicular doors is the almost constant square head over the arch, which is surrounded by the outer moulding of the architrave, and the spandrel filled with some ornament ; and over all a dripstone is gene- rally placed. This ornamented spandrel in a square head occurs in the porch to Westminster Hall, one of the earliest Perpendicular buildings, and is continued to the latest period of good execution, and in a rough way much later. In large very rich doors, this square head includes a canopy, and sometimes niches are added, as at King's College, Cambridge. The shafts used in these doors are small, and have mostly plain capitals. But there are still, in the early part of the style, some flowered capitals. The mouldings of the capitals often contain (more parti- cularly in the later dates of the style) a member which is precisely the cyma-recta of Grecian work, which is a compound moulding, having the hollow uppermost and projecting. The architraves of these doors have generally one or more large hollows, sometimes filled with statuary niches, but more plain: this large hollow, in the architraves of both doors and windows, is one of the best marks of this style. Perpendicular windows are easily distinguished by their mullions running in perpendicular lines, and the transoms which are now general. The varieties of the last style were in the disposition of the principal lines of the tracery : in this they are rather in the disposition of the minute parts. A window of four or more lights is generally divided into two or three parts, by strong mullions running quite up, and the THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 91 portion of arch between them doubled from the centre of the side division. The heads of windows, instead of being filled with flowing ramifications, have slender mullions running from the heads of the lights, between each principal mullion, and these have small tran- soms, till the window is divided into a series of small pannels, and the heads, being arched, are trefoiled or cinquefoiled. In the later windows of this style, the transoms are often ornamented with small battle- ments, and sometimes with flowers, which, when well executed, have a very fine effect. It is difficult to particularize among the immense number of Perpendicular windows, for half the win- dows in English edifices are of this style. I may, however, mention St. George's, Windsor, for four lights, and the clerestory windows of Henry Vllth's Chapel for five, as among the best executed. For a large window, the east window of York has no equal, and, by taking its parts, a window of any size may be formed. It is necessary to mention a window^ which may be mistaken for a Decorated window. This is one of three lights, used in many country churches ; the mullions simply cross each other, and are cinque- foiled in the heads and quatrefoiled in the three upper spaces. To distinguish this from a Decorated win- dow, it will generally be necessary to examine its arch, its mullion mouldings, and its dripstone, as well as its being (as it often is) accompanied by a clearly Perpendicular window at the end, or con- nected with it so as to be evidently of that time. Its 92 THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. arch is very often four-centred, which at once de- cides its date ; its mullion mouldings are often small, and very delicately worked ; its dripstone in many instances has some clear mark ; and when the Deco- rated tracery is become familiar, it will be distin- guished from it by its being a mere foliation of a space, and not a flowing quatrefoil with the mould- ings carried round it. Large circular windows do not appear to have been in use in this style ; but the tracery of the circles in the transepts of Westminster Abbey appear to have been renewed during this period. In Henry Vllth's Chapel, a window is used in the aisles which seems to have led the way to that wretched substitute for fine tracery, the square-headed windows of Queen Elizabeth's and King James Ist's time. When canopies are used, which is not so often as in the last style, they are generally of the ogee character, beautifully crock- eted. Perpendicular English arches offer, as I said be- fore, great variety. But the four-centred — also called the Depressed, Henry VHth's, and the Tudor arch — is the one most frequently used in large buildings. The triforium disappears, and its place is supplied by pannels, as at St. George's, Windsor, or statuary niches, as in Henry VHth's Chapel, or it is left without substitute, as at Bath, Manchester old church, &c. The buttresses differ very little from those of the preceding style, and are generally crowned with pinnacles ; the flying buttresses are often pierced with rich and elaborate tracery. Perpendicular THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 93 porches are very frequently of two stories ; and generally those attached to large churches are elabo- rately ornamented with pannelling, rich canopied niches, armorial bearings, and other sculptured deco- rations. The Perpendicular groined roof was often of a very complicated design, the ribs being disposed in a variety of ways, and generally adorned with richly carved bosses. The roof with /«/? tracery is a roof peculiar to the Perpendicular style. It is the most delicate description of roof, and displays the most elaborate workmanship. One glance at the plate will say more than a laboured description, and will show immediately the propriety of the name — the fan tracery being so very striking. The earliest and most elegant specimen is that of the Cloisters at Gloucester. Next in merit are King's College, Cam- bridge, Henry Vllth's Chapel, and the Abbey Church at Bath : to these I may add the aisles of St. George's Chapel, and the eastern addition at Peter- borough. To some of these roofs are attached pendants, which in Henry VHth's Chapel and the Divinity School, Oxford, come down as low as the springing line of the fans. These pendants are beau- tiful, and have an exquisite effect for refectories, halls, and other l)uildings of a domestic character; but there is a something light and festive about them which renders them less suitable for churches. The common timber church roof of this style is sim- ple and rich, and not difficult of construction ; its design consists of a number of square compartments, which are formed by a moulded rib above each pier, 94 THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. being crossed by another in the centre of the nave. These spaces are again subdivided. At each inter- section a flower, shield, or other ornament, was usually placed; and at this period the ceiling was frequently painted blue, studded with gilt stars, to represent the firmament. In Suffolk and the adjoin- ing counties, the churches generally have open wooden roofs, of extreme beauty, and of a character perfectly distinct from the ordinary roofs over halls, refectories, and other domestic buildings. Of Perpendicular English steeples we possess spe- cimens of almost every description, from the plain short tower of a country church, to the elaborate and gorgeous towers of Gloucester and Wrexham. There are various fine spires of this style, but their age may be generally known by their ornaments, or the towers supporting them. Almost every conceivable varia- tion of buttress, battlement, and pinnacle, is used ; and the appearance of many of the towers combines, in a very eminent degree, extraordinary richness of execution and grandeur of design. Few counties in England are without some good examples. Besides Gloucester and Wrexham, I may mention Boston in Lincolnshire ; All Saints in Derby, St. Mary's, Taunton, Huish, near Langport, St. George's, Doncaster, are celebrated ; and the plain but excellently proportioned tower of Magdalen Col- lege, Oxford, deserves attention. Among the smaller churches there are many towers of great beauty, but few exceed Gresford, between Chester and Wrex- ham ; indeed, the whole of this church, both exterior THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 95 and interior, is worth attentive examination. To notice all the magnificent towers of this style would be impossible ; but the cathedrals of Canterbury and York must not be omitted. At Canterbury, the cen- tral tower, which has octagonal turrets at the corners, is a very fine one, and the south-west tower is little inferior. At York, the centre tower is a most mag- nificent lantern. The surfaces of the buildings erected at this period are generally more or less covered with pannelling ; and the ornaments most usually introduced are — the rose and portcullis of Henry VII., the Tudor flower, and angels, with expanded wings, holding shields, which are often charged with armorial bearings, or with symbols of a religious and mystical character. Some of the screens, monuments, and chantry chapels, are so overloaded with elaborate and minute enrich- ments, that the skill and perseverance of the sculptor hardly excite our admiration ; and we forcibly per- ceive the truth of the remark of Forsyth, "that mere difficulty surmounted never gives pleasure but to the artist himself; for in the fine arts we never consider the labour bestowed, we consider only the excellence produced." In many Perpendicular buildings the ornament takes the foremost place, instead of being merely sub- ordinate to the general design ; and this being con- trary to order and propriety, displeases instead of charming. The interior of King's College, Cam- bridge, is all pannel except the floor ; for the doors and windows are nothing but pierced pannels, in- 96 THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. eluded in the general design, and the very roof is a series of them of different shapes. Another peculiar ornament of this style is the angel cornice used at Windsor, and in Henry Vllth's Chapel ; but though according with the character of those buildings, it is by no means fit for general use. These angels are used as supporters of shields and as corbels to sup- port roof-beams, &c. Plain as the Abbey Church at Bath is in its general execution, it has a variety of angels as corbels for different purposes. Flowers of various kinds continue to ornament cornices, and crotchets were variously formed towards the end of the style ; those of pinnacles were often very much projected, which has a disagreeable effect. There are many of these pinnacles at Oxford, worked in the decline of the style. The cornice in large builchngs is often composed of several small mouldings, and ornamented occasionally with grotesque animals. Of this there are curious examples at Gresford and Mold, Flintshire, where we find a complete chace of cats, rats, mice, dogs, and a variety of imaginary figures, amongst which various grotesque monkeys are very conspicuous. The origin of the grotesque ornaments with which Gothic architecture abounds has never been fully explained. Horace Walpole accounts for it, in his usual positive tone, by speaking slightingly of the Middle Ages. He says, "It may be a satisfaction to antiquarians to know who first invented those grotesque monsters and burlesque faces, with which the spouts and gutters of ancient buildings are decorated. It was one Marchion, of THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 9? Arezzo, architect to Pope Innocent III. (1 198 — 1216.) Indeed I speak now critically : Marchion used those grinning animals only to support columns ; but in so fantastic an age they were sure of being copied, and soon arrived at the top." I have lately met with a very poetic and beautiful idea respecting the sym- bolical meaning of the grotesque monsters on the corbel-table and cornice, which has quite reconciled me to the sight of them, but I do not feel sure that there is not more fancy than truth in it. It is, that they are intended to represent evil spirits tormented by the sound of sacred music. Perpendicular English niches are very numerous, as among them we must include nearly all the stall, tabernacle, and screen- work in the English churches ; for there appears little wood-work of an older date, and it is probable that much screen-work was de- faced at the Reformation, but restored in Queen Mary's time, and not again destroyed. The remains of oak screen-work and tracery are much greater than would be conceived possible, con- sidering the varied destructions of the Reforma- tion and Rebellion. Most of our cathedrals, and very many smaller churches, contain tabernacle and screen-work in excellent condition, and of beautiful execution. The art of carving in wood was prac- tised at a time when all idea of executing good English work in stone seems to have been lost. There is some excellent screen- work at Huyton, Lancashire, in which 1663 is cut in a manner which proves that it must have been done at the time the II 98 THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. work was carved. Many niches are simple recesses, with rich ogee canopies, and others have over- hanging square-headed canopies, with many minute buttresses and pinnacles crowned with battlements, or, in the later part of the style, with the Tudor- flower, an ornament often profusely strewed over the roofs, ficc. of late rich buildings. Of these niches the best specimens are those in Henry Vllth's chapel, between the arches and clerestory windows. Of the plain recesses with ogee canopies, there are some spe- cimens at Windsor. The finest Perpendicular west front is that of Beverley Minster. What the west front of York is to the Decorated style, that of Beverley is to the Perpendicular, with this addition, that in the latter one style only is seen — all is har- monious. The west fronts of Winchester, Glou- cester, Chester, Bath, and Windsor, are all of this style. At Bath there is a curious representation of Jacob's dream, the ladders forming buttresses, and angels filling the space about the great window. Of small churches, St. George's, Doncaster, and Trinity, Hull, have good west fronts ; and the east ends of Louth church, Lincolnshire, and Warwick church, as well as its companion, the Beauchamp chapel, are fine examples. Of Perpendicular porches there are so many, that it is no easy matter to choose examples. That attached to the south-west tower of Canterbury Cathedral, which is covered with niches, the south porch at Gloucester, and the third north porch at Beverley, are perhaps the finest examples. The last, as a THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 99 pannelled front, is unequalled. Of small porches, that of King's College chapel, Cambridge, is one of the finest. The monumental chapels of this style are peculiarly deserving attention, and often of the most elaborate workmanship. The one at Boxgrove, erected by Lord La War in 1532, is of course late Perpendicular. In the choir at Arundel are several monuments, one very rich of late Perpendicular. Perpenthcular fonts are very numerous, and of all sorts of workmanship, from the roughest description to the most elaborate ; but they are more generally rich than plain. At this period the wooden covers were often very splendid and elaborate compositions ; sometimes of tabernacle- work, sometimes representing a pelican, often painted and gilt. And now I close my descriptions of the four styles of English Ecclesiastical Architecture, hoping I have enabled you to fomi some idea, on entering a church, of the period in which it was built. As you seem so much interested in the subject, I intend adding a few more lectures on Stained Glass, Eccle- siastical Furniture, &c. When we meet next, I shall speak of the two most important points of interior decoration (if indeed such a term as decoration can be used for what is indispensable), viz. Fonts and Altars. Hist of i;^crpcn"tiiculav C!)!!!^!)^?! in Sussex, Chichester cathedral : the Cloisters. Arundel : a very beautiful cross church, built H 2 100 THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 1380. It is exquisitely proportioned, but remark- ably plain. The nave and transepts only are used for divine service, and the chancel was for many years shut up, and left to decay. It is exceedingly beautiful, and adorned with several splendid monu- ments to the memory of members of the noble family of Arundel, ancestors of the present duke of Nor- folk. The choir is at present undergoing repair, which every lover of Gothic architecture must rejoice at. The windows are decidedly Perpendicular. If it were not for that, the first glance gives the idea of an Early English Church. There is an exquisitely beautiful stone pulpit, which it makes one's heart ache to see fitted up as a pew, and a tall ugly wooden one, with reading pew and clerk's desk, erected under the tower. This and the pews of course injure the harmony of the whole, and do as much as any thing can do towards concealing the exquisite proportions of the nave. The cutting off the choir, placing the communion-table in the south transept (the old stone altar remaining in the ruined choir), is of course a most serious defect, and it is much to be wished that this beautiful church, one of the most perfect in Sussex, could be restored in perfectly good taste. Among the monuments in the chancel are, a large sculptured table-tomb in the centre, (of alabaster, formerly painted and gilt,) of Thomas, Earl of Arundel, son of the founder, and Beatrix his wife ; an open bier, with an emaciated figure in a shroud below ; the head supported by two angels, and a large and lofty sacellum, very similar to the one at THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE. 101 Boxgrove. By the way, I did not observe that Lord La War's chapel is now fitted up as a pew, with windows let in, &:c. — as melancholy a sight as the pulpit at Arundel. There is a good Perpendicular font, removed a few years ago from the porch to the altar : it is to be hoped it will soon be moved back again. — Battle : the south aisle is Perpendicular. — Etchingham : some parts Perpendicular. — Lewes : St. Thomas a Becket and St. Michael's, portions of Perpendicular ; All Saints tower. — Oviny : some windows inserted. — Rye : east window. East Angmering, Billinghurst, West Bourne, Brede, Brightling, St. Andrew's (Chichester), St. Peter-the-Great (ditto), Crowhurst, Cuckfield, Dar- lington, Gestling, Hailsham, Henfield, Hooe, May- field, North Mundham, Ore, Parham, Penhurst, Poking, Pyecombe, Ringmer, Singleton, Ticehurst, Uckfield, Wiggenhall, Westham, Wytham, — all Per- penchcular, but none of them very large or fine examples. Chichester Cross is the richest market cross in England ; it is Late Perpendicular. The following churches ought rather to have been mentioned under the head of Early Englisli, but they have Perpen- dicular insertions and additions : Alboume, Bexhill, Chidham, Folkington, Edburton, West Hampnett, Little Hampton, Hanney, Houghton, Kirdford, Laughton, East Lavant, Litthngton, Maresfield, Pul- borough, Rachton, Rodmill, Rotherfield, Sedles- comb, Selsey, SuUington, Thakeham, Walberton, WilHngdon. LECTURE VII. dFonts anb Altars. " There dwells in this deep fount Anointing, souls to lave. And from beneath this holy mount Goes forth the heahng wave. " Here Christ, of His own blood. Himself the chalice gives, And feeds His own with angels' food, On which the spirit lives." Hymn at the Consecration of a Church. {Parisian Breviary.) The first object which should arrest our attention as we enter a church is the Font. It is (or rather ought to be) invariably placed at the west end, near the entrance, to symbolize the great truth, that holy Baptism, of which the font is the instrument, is the sacrament of admission into the Christian church. Before Christianity was established in the land, Bap- tism was administered in fountains and rivers ; but afterwards baptisteries were provided and consecrated, FONTS AND ALTARS. 103 for the sake of order and reverence, and were, with reference to the fountains, called *' fonts." Great varieties of form and arrangement are found in fonts. The earlier ecclesiastics of this kingdom held holy Baptism to be a high mystery and privilege, and therefore lavished on the font the greatest possible care and art. There is no part of the church, or its furniture, which has been so often preserved through all the changes which have taken place in the sur- rounding buildings, as the font. Hence we have more Norman fonts than Norman churches ; and it is probable that several fonts, now existing in build- ings of comparatively recent date, are among the very oldest relics of ancient Ecclesiastical Archi- tecture. Of this our own neighbourhood offers us many striking examples : Pagham, Felpham, Yapton, Selsey, Mertsham, all Early English churches, have fonts of great antiquity. They are of the very ear- liest Norman period, if not Saxon. Indeed, I can never see the rude fonts at Felpham, Pagham, and Selsey, without a feeling of reverence, almost amount- ing to awe, from a lurking belief that from those very fonts St. Wilfred himself administered the life- giving waters of Baptism to our Saxon forefathers. The fonts at Selsey and Pagham resemble each other closely : a square block of marble with circular aperture, now raised on a large shaft, surrounded by four smaller ones, brought from the monastic ruins. I cannot help remarking the good taste and right feeling shown in placing the old font at Pagham in so striking and beautiful a situation. It stands just 104 FONTS AND ALTARS. under a lancet window, which is filled with stained glass, representing the Baptism of our Lord. There is much quaint beauty in the design of that little window. The font at Felpham is square, with rude arches in low relief, and is raised on a cylindrical column ; the lowest step is let into the ground. All the ancient fonts are large enough to immerse a child, and as immersion is the rule of our church, (though by means of a sort of dispensation or indul- gence, we seldom comply with the rule,) it is highly improper to substitute a small basin or porringer for a large font. The people at large seem scarcely to have an idea that immersion is still ordered by the Rubric, unless the child is delicate. You will not soon forget the clerk, who, when showing us one of the churches in this neighbourhood, informed us that the reason the font was so large was that it was very ancient, and that " it was supposed that in old times they used to dip the children." There are fonts much ruder than those I have mentioned. The fonts at Little Maplestead and Heron Gate, Essex, are little more than large stones, scarcely reduced to any shape, except near the top, and then hollowed to contain the water. We observed a very rude font of this kind, raised on shafts of more modem date, at Steyning. The first well-defined form the font assumes is a circular tub-shaped vessel, with little grace of form, except that which arises from the base being somewhat smaller than the rim. Some of these fonts may be Saxon, many of them are cer- FONTS AND ALTARS. 105 tainly Norman ; and when adorned with a series of arches and pillars in relief, and elevated on a step, such a font is not unworthy of the west end of an Anglo-Norman church. Somewhat later came the square stone, hollowed in the centre, and supported by a single massive colunm, as at Felpham, or on one central and four smaller columns, as at Pagham. This arrangement obviously affords room for deco- rating the sides with symbolical figures, and we find the Norman sculptures soon adorning the fonts pro- fusely. At East Meon church, Hants, there is a curious font, on which is described the Fall of man, the part of Scripture history best adapted to the entrance of the church, and admirably placed on the font in which is washed away the stain which thence descends upon all the children of Adam. The font of Winchester cathedral is very like that of East Meon, but the design of the sculpture is more ob- scure. The font of Burnham Deepdale, in Norfolk, represents the labours of the husbandman, probably with reference to the Lord's vineyard. At St. Nicholas church, Brighton, there is a very curious font, which some persons have imagined to be a trick upon antiquaries, i. e. an imitation of an early Nor- man font, carved in modem times. The clearness and freshness of the sculpture is wonderful : the figures are grotesque and ludicrous, yet there is spirit and expression in some of them. One side repre- sents the sacrament of the Lord's Supper; our Saviour is in the act of blessing the bread, and the apostles lift up their hands and eyes in utter amaze- 106 FONTS AND ALTARS. ment at the miraculous change. If this font be really ancient, then there is nothing irreverent about it, as the figures carved by a rude people would not be ludicrous in the eyes of those who could make nothing better ; but if it be the work of a modem artist, and executed by way of joke, it is a melancholy specimen of perverted skill — I may say, of shocking profane- ness. Fonts afterwards changed in shape : hexagonal and octagonal fonts were introduced. The former is unecclesiastical and unmeaning. The octagon is un- doubtedly the most appropriate form for a font, and the most beautiful, as well as the most ecclesiastical. It is symbolical, according to the ancient method of spiritualizing numbers, of the new birth in baptism ; for the seven days' creation of the natural world are symbolized by the number seven, and the new crea; tion by Christ Jesus by the number eight ; in allusion to the eighth day, on which He rose again from the dead ; and this reason St. Ambrose, more than fourteen centuries ago, assigned for the octagonal form of the baptistery. At Ware, in Hertfordshire, we find an octagonal font charged with whole length figures, in very bold relief, of the Salutation, of St. John the Baptist, of St. James the Less, St. Catherine, St. George, St. Christopher, and of St. Margaret and the dragon. Between the compartments busts of angels hold musical instruments, and the instru- ments of the passion. Anglo-Norman fonts are very numerous. Early English fonts are exceedingly rare, and can be dis- FONTS AND ALTARS. 107 tinguished from those of the Anglo-Norman period only by their characteristic mouldings and other or- naments. At Plymstock, Devon, Bainton, North- amptonshire, and St. Giles's, Oxford, there are Early English fonts. Decorated fonts are by no means com- mon. That in the church of St. Mary Magdalen, Ox- ford, is a very elegant example of this style. At Grant- chester, Cambridgeshire, there is a Decorated font, plain enough to be taken at first sight for a Norman one. At Laughton-en-le-Morthen, Yorkshire, there is a very elegant font of the Decorated style. Perpendicular fonts are very numerous, and, as I said before, vary greatly in design and execution. They are almost invariably octagonal, and generally enriched with pannelling and the ornaments of the style, but not always. At Worsted, and at East Dereham, Nor- folk, there are very graceful and rich fonts. Towards the end of the fourteenth century, cano- pies were introduced. At Luton there is a stone canopy, supported by eight pillars, about twenty- eight feet high, making a small oratory round the font, capable of holding eight people. This is, perhaps, unique ; but it is only an expansion of the canopy, at one time almost universal. The Puritans were great enemies to these canopies. William Dowsing, one of those wise men who — " Call fire, and sword, and desolation, A godly, thorough reformation," was terribly scandalized at Sefford, by "a glorious cover over the font, like a Pope's triple crown, witli 108 FONTS AND ALTARS. a pelican on the top picking its breast, all gilt over with gold." I mentioned before, that in the ancient church baptisteries were usual : the finest specimens remaining are those of Pisa, Florence, and Parma. In England we have hardly any. At Canterbury there is a building called the baptistery, in which the font is now placed ; but it is very doubtful that the building was originally intended for the purpose. It was by no means uncommon, a few years ago, to see the ancient font removed, and a small basin made to supply its place. You may remember that at F a stone trough, which had served for a sink under a pump in the rectory garden for many a long year, was discovered by antiquarian eyes to be the upper part of the old font, destroyed, probably, during the great rebellion. Our own font, you know, served for a cattle trough at the public-house from the days of the Puritans to our own. In some churches the old fonts w^ere removed to make room for an additional pew, and a basin or porringer sub- stituted. But better times have dawned. Every day we hear of old fonts being rescued from lumber places, or from desecrating purposes, and placed where they ought to be ; or of new fonts, formed on ancient models, being erected in churches. At St. Paul's church, Edinburgh, there is a modern font, unfor- tunately hexagonal and too small, but still possessing much beauty and richness, being ornamented with bas-reliefs of the Baptism of our Lord, and other ap- propriate subjects. At Hedingly church, Yorkshire, FONTS AND ALTARS. 109 there is a modern font of good design, though too small. At St. Peter's, Brighton, there is a modern font, quite on an ecclesiastical model, and, though plain, possessing some grace. And now to speak of the holiest part of the church. In cathedrals the space about the altar is called the choir, in parish churches the chancel. If the church be built in the form of a cross, the choir should be the spot where our blessed Redeemer's breast lay when stretched on the cross. " Pace we the ground ! our footsteps tread A cross — the builder's holiest form — The awful couch, where once was shed The blood with man's forgiveness warm. And here, just where his mighty breast Throbb'd the last agony away, They bade the voice of worship rest, And white-rob'd Levites pause and pray !" There is such exceeding beauty in this idea, that I cannot give the preference to an oblong form for a church over the cruciform, though I am aware that critics of the finest taste, and of truly catholic feeling, have objected to the cruciform plan for small churches^ on the score that, unless the edifice is on a large scale, the cross gives an idea of a miniature or plaything cathedral, and is far less solemn than the long simple parallelogram. But surely being able to take in the whole design of the cross at a glance, which the great size (aided by the numerous screens, partitions, and monuments) of our vast cathedrals prevents the eye from doing, is an advantage which 110 FONTS AND ALTARS. may almost compensate for the objection advanced. Pagham church has nothing of the baby-house cha- racter attributed to small crucifonii churches, in spite of its being too light, and having the enormous dis- advantage of a flat plaistered ceiling, enough in itself to banish every thing Hke sublimity from a church. In most of the Sussex churches we find the chancel higher than the nave, a great advantage, and one which has been lost sight of too often in modem churches. The steps by which you ascend to the altar at Felpham and South Burstead are the width of the church, and give dignity to the chancel. I mentioned before, that on the south side of the altar we frequently find sedilia, a sort of seats hollowed out in the wall, where the deacons, or assistant priests, sat at the celebration of the holy Eucharist ; or, rather, at the sermon, for I do not imagine they sat during the rest of the service. The piscina is a niche, sometimes very plain, and very often of great beauty, according to the style of the church. I men- tioned those in this neighbourhood before. In Chel- tenham church there is one of great beauty, in the Decorated style. There is another, very elegant, at Helmsley, Yorkshire. In the town of Leicester, the churches of St. Margaret, St. Martin, St. Mary, and St. Nicholas, have sedilia and piscinae worthy of examination. And now to consider the altar itself The first Christian altars were no doubt of wood, being, in fact, the ordinary tables which were found in the upper chambers in which the Christian assemblies FONTS AND ALTARS. Ill were held. The Christians were so anxious to con- secrate to a religious use the vessels and furniture of the sanctuary, that buildings were set apart for divine services, and sacred vessels accounted the property of the church, long before the age of persecution had passed away. Still, even after the time of Constan- tine, altars were made of wood, as we find from the accounts of the sacrilegious outrages of the Donatists (a branch of the African church which in the fourth century seceded from the communion of the church catholic), who set the example of profaning altars, which was followed by the Independents and Pres- byterians in Oliver Cromwell's time. We read of persons being beaten with fragments of broken altars, and of altars being burnt, which proves that they must have been of wood. Mr. Poole says that he remarks this fact more especially, because the Anglican church sanctions wooden altars, while the Roman ritual makes a stone slab, consecrated by a bishop, an essential part of the altar. It is, however, certain that stone altars were used very early, and the custom, after a time, became general. In the earliest ages of the church. Christians, for the sake of concealment, often solemnized the rites of their faith in burial places. The tombs of the martyrs would naturally present themselves as the most commodious, and, what was infinitely more valued, the most sacred spots on which to consecrate the holy Eucharist. The affections of the Christians clung to these recol- lections, and afterwards, when they were able to choose the place and manner of their service, they 112 FONTS AND ALTARS. erected altars, as much as might be, resembling those at which they had worshipped in the days of per- secution. They often chose the spot on which some martyr had received his crown, and made his tomb the ahar of a Christian church. The church of St. Alban's is said to have been erected on the very spot where the blood of the first British martyr was shed. But churches soon multiphed beyond the number of martyrs, or, at least, beyond the number of places at which martyrs had suffered ; still a stone altar was raised, and, to supply the deficiency, relics of saints were buried under it. Hence arose the custom, eventually enjoined by the church of Rome, of having none but stone altars, inclosing relics of saints. At the time of the Reformation there was a strong connexion in the minds of the common people between stone altars and the doctrine of transubstan- tiation, which led our reformers to substitute a wooden table for a stone altar. This was a very strong measure, and perhaps not quite a right one. Certainly the scandalous treatment which these modem altars were permitted to receive at the hands of the Puritans, was partly the consequence of their being of wood, and moveable. The first thing that the Puritan reformers did on entering a church to pillage it, was to drag the communion-table from the chancel, and place it in the middle of the church. Very often they sat upon it, and treated it with every possible mark of contempt. In some cases they thrust the communion-tables out of the churches, and rONTS AKD ALTARS. 113 used them for the meanest purposes. We read of carpenters using them for planing boards ; and we know that the parliamentary soldiers drank their ale and smoked their tobacco round the altar at West- minster, under the very eyes of the parliament. This is apt to make some persons fear that removing the original altars was not pleasing to Almighty God, and that the desecration of the wooden tables which took their places was permitted as a judgment. Not that we can feel sure of this. It is treading on deli- cate and dangerous ground, to decide on what are judgments and what are not. I merely say, that one cannot help fearing that it might be so. We must not forget that the Reformers were after all but fallible men ; and we are not to make idols of them, and con- sider them in the light of inspired apostles, however grateful we may feel for what benefits we have received through their zeal and courage. At any rate, we conceive ourselves quite free to depart from many things they ordered, as, for instance, that there should be two lights upon the altar (which were ordered by King Edward Vlth, ratified by the Par- liament, and confirmed by Queen Elizabeth, and have never been counter-ordered since). There- fore I conceive we do not consider the Reformers' opinions in such minor matters as binding on us, and that we may consider ourselves at liberty to have stone altars, now that all fear of the common people connecting them with transubstantiation is over. At Pagham church there is an altar of black mar- ble, and at the church of St. Mary Magdalen, Ripon, 114 FONTS AND ALTARS. there is a modern stone altar. The very interesting little church of Perranzabiiloe, so lately brought to light, has a rude stone altar. It must be acknowledged that stone is preferable, both from its superior beauty and durability, and also from its offering more opposition to the profaneness of radical church reformers. The altar should be provided with a covering of velvet or silk, on which the Holy Name, the cross, and various other sacred and mystical emblems may be appropriately em- broidered. And here you will expect me to dwell upon a part of the church's furniture, which seems to come more immediately within our own peculiar province than any other part of the interior decorations. Why should not we, like the ladies of the olden time, con- sider it a blessed and lofty privilege to be called on to spend time, money, and talents, in providing a cover for the Lord's table ? Is it not the greatest possible pleasure to bestow thought, and time, and actual labour, on any article of our handywork, which is to be bestowed on a dear friend? What woman is there that has not felt the delight which springs from working for those she loves ? Even they who chslike the needle at other times, find the little glittering piece of steel invested with a magic charm, when it is used in the service of those dear to them ; and shall Christian women deny themselves the hallowed delight of employing their talents and in- dustry in the service of the Lord Jesus ? We cannot, like the zealous and active Martha, FONTS AND ALTARS. 115 " wait with reverence meet" on our Lord in the body ; neither can we break the alabaster box, perfume His sacred feet with costly spikenard, and wipe them with our hair. No ; we are placed at a humbler distance from Him ; we see Him only with the eye of faith, and we must be content to offer Him homage of a more shadowy kind. Nevertheless, let us not be discontented with our own lot. Let us consider that we possess ad- vantages unknown to the primitive saints, in the glorious spectacle of fulfilled prophecy. Let us not forget the fiery trial that they had to pass through ; and when we reflect on our own lukewamn zeal, and frames weakened by habits of self-indulgence, let us be thankful that we are not called upon to follow them in the martyrs' fiery road, or the con- fessors' thorny path, and let us redouble our efforts to do our duty in the humbler state marked out for us. Surely, when we think of the sacrifices offered in days long past, we shall blush at our own self- indulgent habits, and try to make some sacrifices, slight though they may be, still something to testify our wisli to offer of His own to Him who gave us all. And let us not be tempted to doubt that He will accept the offering. Holy Scripture abounds with precepts and examples, both in the Old and New Testament, which show that God does not despise such offerings. Let us not say, such things are trifling and puerile. If Almighty God deigned to mention such particulars as the blue fringes, and the I 2 116 FONTS AND ALTARS. curtains with their loops, the candlestick with the almond-branches, the knops, and the flowers, surely it ill becomes dust and ashes like ourselves to assume a lofty attitude, and speak of such things as if they were too trifling for our serious attention. And if we really love the Lord Jesus, if our hearts bleed when we look upon the cross, or read the gospel narrative of His sufferings, if we long to behold Him with our eyes, if we envy those blessed women who were permitted to minister to Him, surely it will be our greatest earthly delight to be able to adorn His altar — the sacred place on which the unbloody sacri- fice is still offered up, the table whence we are fed with heavenly manna, the sanctuary where we behold our Redeemer face to face ! In the present day it is very common to hear of ladies uniting to present testimonials of respect to clergymen. We find young people, all zeal and energy, entering into schemes of the kind. I do not mean to speak slightingly of this feeling ; it is an amiable one, and doubtless every pastor who receives testimonials of the gratitude of his flock, has reason to thank God for having given him the power of gaining their affections. Still I should like to see this done, and the other not left undone. And more, I should like to see the first place given to the church. I feel sure that there is hardly a clergyman who would not be more gratified at receiving an altar- cloth, fald-stools, or stained glass, for his church, from the hands of the ladies of his flock, than a piece of plate, a gown, or six dozen cambric handkerchiefs. FONTS AND ALTARS. 117 But I must not forget that many individuals among us have already set us a good example. Her most gracious majesty the Queen Dowager has presented more than one altar-cloth to the church, and we have heard the names of several ladies who have followed in Queen Adelaide's path. The altar-cloth at cathedral is the work of a young lady. The altar- cloth of a recently built church in the parish of , near Bristol, was worked by four sisters. It may be urged that so costly a gift can be offered by very few. I would suggest that young ladies should unite both their money and their labour, and this plan would have several advantages. The greatest would be the bond of union it would create. Nothing knits hearts closer than a sympathy of feel- ing and sentiment, brought out into a stronger light by opportimity of acting in concert. And, indeed, in these hard selfish days we want a bond of union, and we ought to encourage every thing that would tend to make yoimg people more simple in their tastes, more affectionate, less fond of ridiculing warmth of feeling and lofty aspirations. Many a young woman, whose heart glows with kind feeling, as- sumes a habit of saying sarcastic things, from a dread of being thought romantic or sentimental. Many a girl is accused of heartlessness and frivolity, because she has been trained from childhood to say she despises poetry and heroics. It is the fashion of the day to bring up girls on the principle of looking after the main chance ; and yet people wonder that they meet with young ladies in society, vulgar- 118 FONTS AND ALTARS. minded, interested, and mercenary, in spite of accom- plishment and grace. A dread of making a bad match, or of dying an old maid, is instilled into girls ; they look upon the space between their first entering the world and their marriage as a sort of transition state — something too uncertain to be worth thinking of. As long as they do not neglect some of their self-evident duties, as daughters, and sisters, and Christians, (for I am not speaking of girls brought up altogether without religion,) they are satisfied that nothing more will be required of them, and they never imagine it necessary to think of ac- counting for time and money wasted on things that bring no real pleasure, and that end in weariness of spirit. We must all have something to fix our energies and minds upon. Men have public life, professions, business : women till they marry (excepting in parti- cular cases), nothing. Why it is I do not imdertake to say ; but it is an admitted fact, that there are more single ladies in the world now than there used to be, and yet nobody seems to believe that they are so from their own choice. And, certainly, the educa- tion so common now-a-days, imfits women for a single life to a remarkable degree. Now if children were brought up to love the Church as something real and tangible, to mingle more poetry and senti- ment with their religion, to consider this life as a mere passage to another, and to behold in the Church the type of the heavenly Jerusalem, their feelings and tastes would insensibly take a loftier tone ; they FONTS AND ALTARS. 119 would think more of God, and less of themselves; that flippancy and love of ridicule, which is so com- mon among girls otherwise amiable, would vanish, they would become more humble, and at the same time more dignified ; that restless craving for atten- tion, that love of display, which we see carried even into religion, would be lessened, if not destroyed, by a real enthusiasm for art, consecrated to the adornment of the church ; in their companions they would see fellow-pilgrims and sisters in Christ, instead of acquaintances to be cherished one day, and cast off for more agreeable friends another. If they married, their path would be self-evident, and their former habits would not interfere with the performance of their new duties ; but if, as the chances seem against their forming new ties, they are destined to a single life, then the full value of the tastes and habits they have acquired will shine forth. The church is indeed a home for the lonely ; a single life enables persons to devote themselves more entirely to heavenly things, without neglecting every day duties. Much as it is the fashion to decry religious celibacy, Holy Scrip- ture certainly warrants our believing the single state to be more conducive to holiness than the married. Who can read St. Paul, and not see this clearly ? Far be it from me to say, that equal holiness is not attainable in the married state ; I merely mean, that the single woman has the easier task. She has not the temptations of making idols of husband and children, of loving the world for their sake, of devot- ing? the whole of her time and thou<;hts to their 120 FONTS AND ALTARS. welfare, to the neglect of her religious duties. And I though, no doubt, most women are fitted by nature for wedded life, I am sure that there are more than the despisers of religious celibacy would believe, who are intended to remain single. " They kept from earthly fire, That holier love might them inspire ; And when themselves their Lox'd's to be They bound in stern fidelity, He more and more did bind the chain, And aye with them remain, " Lest worldly image, brought O'er the pui-e mirror of their thought, Should sully the heav-n-openmg soul. Which they to God devoted whole ; Their mind upon itself was driven, Theu' eye and ear in heav'n ^" Whatever the sceptical may say to this idea, it cannot be denied that there are a great number of single ladies in the world, who seem to lead an aim- less, cheerless existence, because they are not at the head of a household, and because they live in ex- pectation of being ridiculed as "old maids." Surely it would be a great increase of happiness, if women of this class could see the matter in the light I have shown it, and find a centre for their thoughts and affections in the Church, the true ark of refuge to the weary soul, which flies over the waves of this trou- blesome world, seeking a resting-place in vain. I have wandered far from architecture to-night ; 1 Parisian B^e^^arv. FONTS AND ALTARS. 121 but I think you will pardon this digression, seeing that it is on a subject that cannot fail of being inte- resting. I have no more to say on the subject of altar-cloths but this — that if twelve young ladies chose to associate themselves to work an altar-cloth for their parish church, they would find that a very moderate share of money and time from each indi- vidual would enable them to get through their under- taking in a year. The material may be velvet, rich silk, or cloth. The altar cloth at Hill, near Bristol, worked by the four daughters of a cler- gj^man, is of dark cloth, with a rich border of an ecclesiastical pattern, formed of scarlet and bright blue cloth applique, the edges being concealed by gold braid, and short sentences in Latin, such as " Gloria Deo," worked with gold braid in missal characters, within compartments, at stated distances in the border. Designs of a strictly ecclesiastical character may be obtained in London, together with embroider^' materials, and directions for using them. LECTURE VIII.