- : ^z^c c><-£-^L 7 $f Uu<^^^ **wv J^v A «3 BIOMEDICAL LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO DATE DUE FEB 9 - RECTI AUG 9 1QQH . AUG l f i hbA ■ 1 1 u .- DFP 11 DCPft KfcLTl MR' . 15W Rflflfl nQ*(J CAYLORD PRINTED IN USA. ill ii i mi mi in ill in ill 111 iii urn mil ii in ii 3 1822 01222 6213 -/— - ' V-. CLINICAL NOTES OH UTERINE SURGERY. WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE STERILE CONDITION. By J. MARION SIMS, A.B., M.D. LATE SURGEON TO THE WOMAN'S HOSPITAL, NEW YOKE, Fellow of the New York Academy of Medicine ; of the New York Pathological Society ; of th« New York Historical Society ; of the New York State Medical Society ; of the Royal Medical and Chirurgical Society, London; of the London Medical Society ; of the Pathological Society ; Hon. Fellow of the Obstetrical Society, London ; Honorary Member of the • German Society of Physicians and Naturalists, Paris ; Hon. Fellow of the Im- perial Academy of Medicine of Belgium ; Knight of the Legion d'Honneur, &c. NEW YORK: WILLIAM WOOD & CO., 27 GREAT JONES ST. Trow's Printing and Bookbinding Co., 205-213 East 1 2th St., NEW YORK. TO SIR JOSEPH F. OLLIFFE, M.D., (UNIV. PARIS), , FELLOW OP TflE ROYAL COLLEGE OP PHYSICIANS (LOND.) ; PHYSICIAN TO HER MAJESTY'S E1IBA891 AT PAKIS ; OFFICER OP Till! LEGION OP HONOUR, ETC. ETC. My Dear Sir Joseph, When I came to Europe, now more than three years ago, I had no idea of remaining here permanently. But I found in you a warm and generous friend, whose wise counsels and noble liberality elevated me at once into a most favorable position. It was princi- pally through your influence that I was able to reach the highest circles of practice. Without you my sojourn here would have been temporary and fruitless. Let me assure you, my dear Sir Joseph, that it is not only to you, as a learned and accomplished Physician, whose great talents and attainments have placed him so deservedly in the foremost ranks of his Profession ; but it is also to you as a true man of noble impulses and generous nature; it is to you as a Friend, when I most needed a cheering comforting word, that I now come with this Volume, and beg you to accept it simply as a token of Gratitude for the many acts of kindness and friendship which you have so lavishly bestowed upon me. J. MARION SIMS. PREFACE. In 1862, I voluntarily left my own country, on account of its political troubles. Our unfortunate civil war continued much longer than any of us, North or South, anticipated. In consequence of this my residence abroad was prolonged far beyond my original intention. I therefore had time to look over my note-books, and to cull such facts as illustrate the method of treating Uterine Disease at the Woman's Hospital. These facts are strung together in the form of these " Notes." Having an innate horror of writing, I have not tried to make a book ; on the contrary, I have simply related in detail my various operations, and given the history of cases in which circumstances led me to adopt a modified procedure, or for which I have devised new forms of instruments. A clinical report of this sort very naturally divides itself into groups of cases which may be made illustrative of the principles of practice. In my own country my contributions have generally been received with kindness ; and although I have reason to hope that they will have a friendly reception here, still, as I make no literary pretensions, it is with the greatest diffidence that I appear as an author on this side of the Atlantic. As its title indicates, this collection of " Clinical Notes" lays no claim whatever to the character of a systematic work. It is simply a voice fron the Woman's Hospital, which, in all v j PREFACE. probability, would never have been heard if I had remained at home. I wish most sincerely that I could have produced some- thing more worthy of the position so long held by me in that noble Charity ; for to this I owe all that I know practically of the subjects herein treated. In looking over this volume, it would seem that I owe an apology to, and must claim the indulgence of, my brethren for three things: — 1st. A clinical review of personal experience, taken from note-books, as this has been, must almost of necessity be written in the first person. 2nd. It may be necessary to excuse to my senior readers the minuteness of detail in which I have sometimes indulged ; but, at the same time, I must plead the necessity of such minuteness for the guidance of my younger brethren, for whom principally these pages were penned. 3rd. The illustrations are not all as good as I would have bad them. Most of them are mere diagrams made by myself. For any inaccuracies I alone am responsible ; for any artistic value that they may possess, the credit is wholly due to Leveille, Lackerbauer, and Yien, of Paris ; and to Mr. Orrin Smith, of London. A word of explanation on another point. It will be seen that I have not touched upon the accidents of parturition, such asfistuke of the bladder, rectum, and vagina, lacerated perineum, &c. It is only just to myself to say that I have ignored these for the present, because I hope, if time and circumstances permit, to prepare, at no distant day, a fully illustrated mono- graph on these subjects. To have done them ample justice here would have interfered, in some sort, with the plan, and aug- mented very considerably the size of this volume. PREFACE. y jj In conclusion I beg leave to say that I am under special obligations to Dr. Tbos. D. Pratt for timely aid ; and I take tbi? occasion to return my sincere thanks to my friend, Mr. Ernest Hart, for useful suggestions and valuable assistance rendered as these pages were passing through the press. London : 1, Bolton Row, May Faib, 1st January, 1860. CONTENTS Introduction, , , , . 1 On the Method of Uterine Examination, 5 SECTION L Conception occurs only during Menstrual Life, .... 27 Early Pregnancy, 29 Conception without Menstruation, ....... 30 Errors in Diagnosis, 32 False Quickening, 34 SECTION II. Menstruation should be such as to snow a Healthy Condition of the Uterine Cavity, Scanty Menstruation, Profuse Menstruation, Menorrhagia from Granular Erosion, from Fibrous Engorgement of the Cervix, from Fungoid Granulations, Sponge Tents, now to make and introduce, Sea Tangle Tent, Menorrhagia from Polypus, .... Use of Glycerine in Uterine Surgery, Diagnosis of Polypous Tumours, The Ecraseur, Intka-Uterine Polypi, Polypi of the Fundus and Posterior Wall, The Operation for the Removal of Polypi, Fibroid Tumours, 37 39 41 43 44 4G 47-C5 6G 67 71 72 76 82 86 90 94 CONTENTS. Uterine Probes, 104 Menorrhagia from Inversion of the Uterus, .... 123 Painful Menstruation, 138 Incision of the Os and Cervix, • 153 SECTION III. The Os and Cervix Uteri should be sufficiently open, not only to permit the Free Exit of the Menstrual Flow, but also to admit the Ingress of the Spermatozoa, 175 Normal Conditions and Relations of the Uterus, . . . 175 Anomalies, 178 Os Tinoe — abnormal, 181 SECTION IV. The Cervix Uteri should be of Proper Size, Form, and Density, . 197 Hypertrophic or Defective Development of Cervix Uteri, . 200 Method of Amputation, 201 Proper Form of the Cervix, 213 Illustrations of the Conical Cervix, 216 Induration of the Cervix, 222 SECTION V. The Uterus should be in a Normal Position, i. e. verted nor perroverted to any great degree Position and Relations of the Pelvic Organs, Uterine Displacements, Anteversion, Retroversion, Pessaries, Procidentia Uteri, NEITHER ANTE- 226 227 229 232 249 26-1 287 SECTION VI. The Vagina must be capable of Receiving and Retaining the Sper- matic Fluid, . 313 Imperforate Hymen, . .315 Vaginismus, 317 Atresia Vaginje 326 Absentia Vaginae, 340 Short Vagina, 342 Non-retaining Vagina 345 CONTENTS. X] SECTION VII. For Conception, Semen with Living Spermatozoa should be deposited in the Vagina at the proper time, Nature and Properties of Semen, Spermatozoa, .... Artificial Fertilization, Period for Conception, 349 351 352 364 371 SECTION VIII. The Secretions of the Cervix and Vagina should not poison or kill the Spermatozoa, 377 The Vaginal Secretions, 379 Vaginitis, 379 Leucorriicea, 383 Vaginal Injection, 385 Endo-Cervicitis, 391 Cervical Mucus, 393 Intra-Uterine Abscess, ........ 396 Endo-Metritis, 397 UTERINE SURGERY. INTRODUCTION. I i»o not propose to write a complete monograph on Ute- rine Surgery, or on the treatment of sterility, but simply to interweave the two, while taking a glance at such surgical difficulties as seem ordinarily to interfere with conception. To make a work of this sort complete would be to write a book on all the diseases of women, and on some of those of the opposite sex. But this is not my object, and I shall confine myself to the consideration of such cases as ordinarily come under the observation of the practitioner. An inquiry into the conditions favourable to concep- tion would almost necessarily involve a consideration of those opposed to it ; and this would lead very naturally to the investigation of the best means of overcoming such obstacles. This is the order in which I propose to consider the subject ; but it is not the one by which my experience was gained. It came by a very different pro- cess. In the course of treating the diseases of women, I, like others similarly engaged, found many cases of sterility accidentally cured simply by curing some uterine affec- tion. After a while I discovered that they were as various and as varying as the diseases upon which they depended. Then, by a classification of all diseases of the 2 UTERINE SURGERY. uterus just as they were encountered, I found sterility to be incident to many of them. These naturally arranged themselves into two classes ; viz., — 1st. Those who had never conceived ; and — 2nd. Those who had ; but who for some reason had ceased to do so for a time, say five years, or more. The first I called " Natural Sterility ; " the second, " Acquired Sterility." In looking over my note-books for a series of years, I was surprised to see how nearly equal these two classes were. Sometimes one and then the other would predo- minate ; but they were so evenly balanced, that from 3 to 6 per cent, would cover the variation either way. I mean that this is so, taking all cases of uterine dis- ease as they are promiscuously presented. If we consider the cases of those only who come to consult us merely on the subject of sterility, without reference to disease or actual suffering, the first class will, of course, greatly predominate. But it is by a study of all, that we de- duce the principles that are to guide our judgment in individual cases. It is by this that we are able to specify the conditions most opposed to conception ; and, at the same time, those most favorable to it. The trouble in one case may depend upon mere con- traction of the os ; in another upon malformation of the same — in another upon engorgement of the cervix — in another upon elongation — in another upon hypertrophy — in another upon simple induration — in another upon curvature of the canal of the cervix — in another upon polypus — in another upon a fibroid — in another upon malposition of the uterus — in another upon some anato- mical anomaly or malformation of the vagina — in ano- ther upon vitiated secretions of the cervix — in another upon those of the vagina, the one generally acting me- chanically, the other chemically — in another upon the INTRODUCTION. 3 absence of spermatozoa ; while others may be compli- cated with several of these anomalies all subjects of study and investigation. And when we come to analyze these various causes and complications, they are resolved into one great gene- ral principle, embracing all manner of obstructions to the free passage of living spermatozoa into the cavity of the womb. In all curable cases ovulation must be per- fect, and the faulty link must be found in defective fruc- tification, or else all our efforts are in vain. If the wo- man has passed the period of ovulation, of course we can do nothing for her. If the ovum never passes into the fallopian tubes, a thing impossible to determine, it is equally beyond remedy. We may safely assume a nor- mal menstruation as a sign of normal ovulation. This being our guide, we may hope, in the majority of cases, to find some of the troubles above enumerated, many of which are eventually curable. It is self-evident that if we knew exactly all the conditions of the uterus and its appendages absolutely essential to fecundation, it would not be very difficult to determine, in any given case, in what particular it dif- fered from the proper standard. And, on the other hand, if we knew exactly the conditions of the uterus and appendages absolutely opposed to fecundation, it would not be very difficult to determine at once the chances of cure. This is but another way of saying that here, as in every other department of medicine, knowledge of both normal action and abnormal condition is essential to safe and sure methods of treatment. A few years ago, the subject of conception was wrapped in the profoundest mystery ; but now, thanks to the labours of Martin Barry, of Bischoff, of Coste, of 4 UTERINE SURGERY. Pouchet, and other modern physiologists, its laws are much better understood. As usual, pathology is here behind its great pioneer, physiology, and yet quite in advance of therapeutics ; for until a comparatively recent period we had no rational views on the treatment of the sterile condition ; and almost all that is now known has emanated from the Edinburgh school. Indeed, little or nothing has been added to the labours of Mcintosh and of Simpson ; and the English language presents us with but one com- plete monograph on the subject, — that by Dr. A. K. Gardner,* of New York. Macintosh f discovered that most of his sterile pa- tients had a contracted os and cervix ; and he con- ceived the idea of dilating these by bougies, such as were used ordinarily for stricture of the urethra. His success was very remarkable, but none of his followers were able to attain equally good results. Simpson, seeing the uncertainty and even danger of dilatation, had the happy thought of incising the os and cervix to render their enlargement more thorough and more permanent. The results have not been all that were hoped for ; but enough has been done to show that we are at last on the highway of improvement ; and it seems to me that further advances must be made as heretofore, by means almost purely surgical. From any point of view this subject is one of great importance ; for the perpetuation of names and families, the descent of property, the happiness of individuals, and occasionally the welfare of the State, and even * " On the Causes and Curative Treatment of Sterility," by A. K. Gard* ner, M.D., &c., New York. 1856. t Macintosh's " Pathology and Practice of Physic." INTRODUCTION. 5 the permanence of dynasties and governments, may depend upon it. Without further preliminary remarks, let us then inquire, " What are the conditions essential to Con- ception ?", 1. — It occurs only during menstrual life. 2. — Menstruation should be such as to show a healthy state of the uterine cavity. 3. — The os and cervix uteri should be sufficiently open to permit the free exit of the menstrual flow, and also to admit the ingress of the spermatozoa. 4. — The cervix should be of proper form, shape, size, and density. 5. — The uterus should be in a normal position, i.e., neither ante-verted, nor retro-verted to any great degree. 6. — The vagina should be capable of receiving and of retaining the spermatic fluid. 7. — Semen, with living spermatozoa, should be deposited in the vagina at the proper time. 8.- -The secretions of the cervix and vagina should not poison or kill the spermatozoa. I lay these down as postulates, embracing the general principles or laws most favourable — indeed, essential to fecundation ; and I propose to take them up seriatim, and to show, from clinical experience, wherein the sterile condition differs from the fecund, and to point out, so far as we know, the surest methods of relief. But before entering upon this discussion, it will be well, perhaps, to say something On the Method of Uterine Examination. — Almost 6 UTERINE SURGERY. every physician accustomed to treat the diseases of women has educated himself to some peculiar method of examination. I propose here to give my own plan. Every thorough uterine investigation is naturally divided into two stages, the first requiring the touch, the second the sight ; the dorsal decubitus for the one, the left lateral for the other. For the touch alone, the patient may lie on a sofa or a bed ; but the one is too low, and the other too soft and yielding, for a speculum examination. I therefore prefer a common table, two or three feet wide, and four or five feet long, covered with a wadded quilt, or blankets folded. This is a little more formidable, but it is better for both physician and patient. Indeed, it is essential, if we wish to make a very thorough examination. The table being properly prepared, the patient is requested to loosen all the fastenings of the dress and corsets, so that there may be nothing to constrict the waist or to compress the abdomen. While this is being done, the physician should bathe his hands in warm water, and wash them well. It may seem odd to insist upon this, but I do most earnestly ; 1st, because it softens and warms the hands ; 2nd, because it insures their clean, ness ; and 3rd, because it assures our patient against any dread of contamination by the touch, a thing by no means to be despised. All being ready, the patient is now requested to sit on the edge of the table, and then to lie down on the back, with -the head, but not the shoulders, supported by a pillow, while the feet rest momentarily on a chair. Many practitioners allow the feet to hang down, each on a chair, but this is by no means the best plan for either physician or patient, nor is it the most deli- INTRODUCTION. f cate. As soon as the patient is laid comfortably back on the table, the surgeon will raise her feet from the chair, upon which he is now to sit down, and place them on the edge of the table, with the heels separated some ten ov twelve inches, while the knees are a little wider apart. This flexure of the thighs and legs in- sures the relaxation of the abdominal walls. Some patients will at first, in spite of our entreaties, place the soles of the feet together, and let the knees fall widely apart, while others will unconsciously hold the knees closely together, and brace the feet firmly out- wards, each condition being equally opposed to an easy exploration of the vagina. The patient once on the back, with the extremities properly flexed and fixed, must be assured that there is to be neither pain nor exposure of person ; this last being more dreaded than the most intense suffering. Everything being ready, let the left index finger be well lubricated, not with sweet oil, which is often gummy and sticky, nor with grease, which is often rancid, but with warm water and Castile or other fine soap, which is a cleaner, cheaper, and better lubricant than any other. Pass the finger into the vagina — do it gently — if otherwise, we may jar the nervous system, and produce involuntary spasmodic action of the abdo- minal muscles. The patient may become agitated and alarmed, and we may perhaps be compelled to pro- crastinate a very minute examination to some future *time. As the finger passes, let it ascertain if there is anything abnormal about the ostium vaginae. Is it contracted, rigid? Is the hymen present or absent? Is it irritable or tender? Then as to the vagina : Does it dip down towards the coccyx ? Does it run more in the direction of the axis of the pelvis ? Is it of normal g UTERINE SURGERY. temperature? Is it short? Is it deep? Is it nar- row ? Is it capacious ? Does it contain any foreign body ? If so, is it something inorganic, previously in- troduced? Or, is it something organic, growing on the walls of the vagina, on the os tincse, or does it come from the cavity of the uterus ? Is it benign or malig- nant? Then what of the womb? Is the os open or closed, large or small ? Is the cervix too long, too pointed, too small, too large ? Is it indurated or ulcerated ? Is the body of the organ in its proper position? Is it ante-verted, retro-verted, or flexed in any direction ? Is it larger or smaller than natural ? Is it of proper form ? Is it indurated ? Is it fixed or movable ? Is there any complication, ovarian or fibroid ? All of these conditions are ascertainable by the touch alone. We need no speculum to tell us of the volume, position, and relations of the uterus and its appendages. But I should not omit to say that the mere touch by the vagina is not alone sufficient. It is necessary to make pressure with the right hand on the abdomen in the hypogastric region at the same time that the left index is carried into the vagina. The two hands then act conjointly in ascertaining the con- dition and relations of the uterus. Is it in its normal position? Then the os uteri will rest on the end of the left index finger, while the fundus will be distinctly felt by the other hand, in a line drawn from the os, in the direction of the umbilicus. Is it ante-verted ? Then the os will be very far back towards the hollow of the sacrum, while the fundus will be felt by the index just behind the symphysis pubis, pressing down upon and perhaps parallel with the anterior wall of the vagina. But I repeat that the touch by the vagina is not INTRODUCTION. 9 enough to determine this point positively, and it is essentia] always to make pressure at the same time with the other hand, just above the pubes. It will Fig. i. then be very easy to measure the size and shape of the body of the womb, for it will be held firmly between the fingers of the two hands, and its outline and irre- gularities will be ascertained with as much nicety as if it were outside of the body. Thus isolated, we deter- mine its condition as easily as we would that of a pear wrapped up in a common towel or napkin. The retro-uterine region, represented here as being occupied by a small tumour, is quite as easily explored by the touch alone. To do this, pass the left index finger to the posterior cul de sac, hook it up behind the cervix uteri, raise this upwards, draw it forwards, and at the same time press the outer hand in the direction of the point of the left index. In a thin subject, where there is nothing abnormal, 10 UTERINE SURGERY. the external finders and the internal one can "be brought very near together behind the cervix, with- out pain to the patient or inconvenience to the operator; and if there is anything abnormal, this manipulation is sure to detect it. We may now and then be obliged to pass the finger into the rectum to clear up some doubtful point ; but this is rarely necessary. By this method, versions, flexions, fibroid offshoots, and other irregularities, are readily detected ; and if at any time there is a doubt about the direction or depth of the uterine cavity, the sound will at once clear it up. Having ascertained all these points by the touch, we are ready for the second stage of the examination — viz., that by the speculum. As before said, for the digital examination, the dorsal decubitus is preferable ; but for the speculum, the left lateral semi-prone position is the best. In 1845 I first used my speculum for vesico- vaginal fistula operations, placing the patient on the knees. I rarely resort to this method now, but as it may some- times be necessary in a complicated case of vesico-vaginal fistula, or in some forms of malignant disease, I shall here quote the following from my first paper on this subject, published in the American Journal of Medical Sciences, January, 1852. "In order to obtain a correct view of the vaginal canal, I place the patient on a table, about two and a half by four feet, on her knees, with the nates ele- vated and the head and shoulders depressed. The kuees must be separated some six or eight inches, the thighs at about right angles with the table, and the clothing all thoroughly loosened, so that INTRODUCTION. 11 there shall be no compres- sion of the abdominal pa- rietes. An assistant on each side lays a hand in the fold between ,the glutei muscles and the thigh, the ends of the fingers extending quite to the labia majora ; then by simultaneously pulling the nates upwards and outwards, the os externum opens, the pelvic and abdominal viscera all gravitate towards the epi- gastric region, the atmosphere enters the vagina, and by its pressure, soon stretches this canal out to its utmost limits, affording an easy view of the os tincae, fistula, not wish to claim it as mine. To adapt it to my own practice I had it made 24 inches wide instead of IS, and 30 inches high instead 22 UTERINE SURGERY. of 22. I have added legs or uprights, a, a, to support the lower part of the chair when it is extended in the form of an operating-table (fig. 7). There is also an elastic cord, £, to pull these uprights back under the chair when it is changed from a table to a mere chair again. For all practical purposes it is really no better, Pig. 1. as before said, than a common table ; but any patient would sit in the chair without nervous agitation, while some become greatly alarmed at being requested to mount a table. The patient once seated, is told that the chair is only a couch, and she is requested to lean back and extend it horizontally by her own weight, with perhaps a little assistance from the nurse who stands at the back of the chair. I am almost afraid to write these little things, but I do it only for my younger brethren, who may need to learn the importance of educating their patients to feel that everything is being done that delicacy and propriety require on an occasion so trying to a sensitive nature. When the patient lies back and the chair is extended in the form of a table, it will be necessary to draw the INTRODUCTION. 23 person down to the lower edge of it, c 4) illustrates the diagnosis. 106 UTERINE SURGERY. On introducing the uterine probe, it passed four inches, striking the anterior wall of the uterus on a line with the upper edge of the pubes ; but was this truly the whole depth of the organ % A gum elastic bougie Fig. 42 would settle this point. On making the effort, it passed easily more than eleven inches into the cavity of the uterus, measuring from the os tincse. But it is not always easy to pass a bougie. If it is large enough not Pig. 43. to bend on itself, it may not pass through some narrow point, and so will deceive us. And if it be too small, OF MENSTRUATION. JQf it will bend on itself in the vagina, and hence it will be difficult -to pass it at all. To overcome these objections, take a bougie about No, 6, sometimes smaller, and run a strong wire in it, and give it a gentle curvature at the distal end, as shown in the diagram (fig. 43). Introduce this just within the os uteri, and then hold the handle of the wire, a, firmly in one hand, and push the bougie, £, along it with the other. The wire thus stiffens the bougie external to the uterus, but allows it to pass onwards to the cavity, taking, of course, the easiest route, and measuring accurately its depth. Whether this direction be in the central axis of the organ, ante- riorly or posteriorly, would be afterwards determined by the sponge tent. In this case the bougie passed nearly its whole length into the cavity of the womb, marking a depth of over eleven inches. This proved that its enlargement was due to a fibroid. It was then a question whether this fibroid was intra-mural or intra- uterine. This was proved at once by a very singular fact, viz. that the gum elastic bougie, when introduced into the cavity of the uterus, could be felt through the thin walls of the abdomen, and thinner of the uterus, from just above the pubes, quite to the fundus far above the umbilicus (see fig. 42). This alone showed that the tumour projected into the cavity of the uterus from the posterior wall of that organ. Was it, then, an enormous fibroid polypus — i. e., an intra-uterine pedunculated tumour, or was it a sessile fibrous tumour, with a broad attachment to the uterine walls ? The sponge tent was to unravel that mystery. It was accordingly resorted to ; the finger was then carried up into the uterus, and the anterior portion of the organ was found to be free, while on the posterior, about an inch above the os tincae, we felt a large tense tumour, having attachments poste- 108 UTERINE SURGERY. riorly at the cervix, which widened out on either side as the finger was thrown in front and around it. The finger detected its attachment posteriorly below, while the probing with the elastic bougie demonstrated it above ; thus proving that the tumour grew from the posterior wall of the uterus, and that it had a base of attachment along this wall of probably not less than eight or nine inches. The tumour itself was unusually tense to the touch, and we concluded to explore it by puncture. In the presence of Dr. Emmet, Dr. Pratt, and Professor Elliot, I passed a trocar into it at its lowest point, and in the direction of its long axis, and there were discharged more than twenty ounces of a colored serum. The puncture was enlarged for two inches, to prevent its closing. There was at once a sensible diminution in the size and tension of the abdo- men. The discharge kept up for some time ; and this, together with occasional injections into the very fundus of the uterus, with the liquor ferri persulphatis, diluted with three or four parts of water, arrested very promptly the haemorrhages, and the patient was dismissed in two months in a very comfortable condition, and with strength enough to walk six or eight miles. Indeed, so far as the hgernorrhages were concerned, she was cured. She returned in a few weeks with ruddy looks to report that she was in very good health, although the abdomen was seemingly as large as ever. It was evidently a fibro- cystic tumour, its first element remaining in statu quo, while its second was destroyed by the puncture and slitting up of the cyst. Within the course of a year afterwards this poor woman died of cholerine of a few hours' duration, which her physician did not think in any way dependent upon the fibroid tumour. We all know that fibroids of the uterus are harmless OP MENSTRUATION. 109 unless they produce haemorrhage or press injuriously on some of the pelvic viscera. I have seen many cases where there were fibroids larger than the foetal head, and the patients were not aware of their existence. I was consulted in' Paris in October, 1863, by a lady who had been married fifteen years without offspring, and she wished to know the cause of her sterility. She had a pedunculated fibroid tumour, large enough to rest on the brim of the pelvis, which drew the uterus forwards and upwards, raising its fundus much above the level of the pubes. Her health was perfect in every respect, and she felt no inconvenience from the tumour, which will doubtless never shorten her life a day. Of late years a good deal has been written on the treatment of fibroid tumours of the uterus. Professor Channing, of Boston, claims to have cured many by internal medication ; while Dr. Simpson seems to have great faith in the long-continued use of the bromide of potassium. Dr. Emmet and myself have tried this and other constitutional remedies in the Woman's Hospital and in private practice, and I am sorry to say we have not been as fortunate as the gentle- man named above. On the contrary, I have never seen the slightest effect produced on such tumours by any internal medication. Dr. Atlee, of Philadelphia, and Mr. Baker Brown, of London, have each attacked uterine fibroids surgically and in a heroic way. Dr. Atlee has had a success in enucleation which has not been equalled by any one else. He advocates a total eradication of the adventitious growth ; while Mr. Baker Brown is satisfied with maiming or mutilating the tumour by what he terms a gouging process. His success has also been very great, not in curing the disease, but in curing its worst manifestation — haemor- 110 UTERINE SURGERY. rhage. And with this we should feel well satisfied ; for, as a general rule, I do not think we should interfere with these tumours unless they endanger life. That there are cases in which we must interfere I readily admit ; and the success of Atlee and Brown will justify such a course. I have not been so fortunate as they in attacking very large intra-uterine fibroids. I have lost two patients in the Woman's Hospital as a consequence of operative procedures ; one from an attempt at enucle- ation, the other from the removal of a bit of the tumour; Fig. 44. the one in imitation of Dr. Atlee, the other in imitation ' of Dr. Brown. The first was the case of an unmarried lady, twenty-eight years old. Menstruation occurred at, sixteen, and continued regular and normal for ten } 7 ears, when it suddenly became abundant and painful. Two years afterwards, in November, 1859, she was admit- ted to the Woman's Hospital. The flow was then profuse, exhausting, and attended with severe forcing pains, from which she suffered for a whole week before the menses made their appearance. The uterus OF MENSTRUATION. 1H was about the size of the organ at the sixth mouth of pregnancy. The os and cervix were small, while the body of the organ was large, hard, and roundish. Its outline and relations are represented in fig. 44. The sound could be passed in the direction of the uterine cavity for only about four inches, being arrested at «, by striking against the anterior wall of the uterus. But the gum elastic bougie showed that the cavity was more than nine inches deep. Then the sponge tent demon- strated that the tumour was intra-uterine, with a broad base of attachment to the posterior wall, beginning just within the os, at e. The great pain preceding and attending each period; the excessive loss of blood at the time ; the increasing prostration ; and the entreaties of the patient, determined ine to enucleate the tumour if possible. The first step towards this was to enlarge the canal of the cervix, which, as before stated, was very small. For this purpose it was split widely open up to the insertion of the vagina, and even to the os internum. The haemorrhage was very profuse, but easily checked. The parts healed before the recurrence of the next flow, which was in no way modified by the opera- tion. The forcing pains and the haemorrhage were quite as great as before. After this, the next step of enucleation was taken, viz. cutting open the capsule of the tumour. Instead of making a long incision through this from above downwards, as practised by Dr. Atlee, I simply cut the capsule transversely at e, making an opening in it about two inches and a half long, and then passed a sound for six or seven inches in the direction of the dotted line e b, extensively lacerating the cellular tissue that bound the posterior wall of the uterus and the tumour together. I now think Dr. Atlee's plan ;Q2 UTERINE SURGERY. of incisiug the capsule would have been the best The bleeding was very profuse, but it was wholly from the first incision, and not from the subsequent lacera- tion. This was checked by a tampon. After Miss M. recovered from the effects of this operation, it was thought advisable for her to go to the country, and wait the efforts of nature in forcing the tumour down through the artificial opening made in its capsule. She returned in two or three months with the mouth of the uterus about two inches and a half in diameter, and a portion of the tumour projecting through it into the vagina. The pain and the haemorrhage were rather worse, whether in consequence of the operation, or in spite of it, I do not know. The attachments of the tumour were now further incised, and its adhesions extensively broken up, but unfortunately Miss M. was attacked with diphtheria, from which she barely escaped with her life. So great was her prostration from this disease and the haemor- rhages combined, that she was again removed from the hospital. She returned six months afterwards (in October, 1860), but the haemorrhages were in no way modified by the process of enucleation, which had been slowly going on for months. The uterus had greatly increased in size, notwithstanding the fact that the tumour, now filling up the whole vagina, was quite as large as the foetal head at full term. Indeed, it seemed that the removal of the obstructions at the cervix uteri only invited and promoted the growth of the tumour down- wards, without dislodging any portion of it from the body of the organ. Its size was so enormous that it was thought advisable to remove all that portion of it OF MENSTRUATION. J] 3 that projected through the dilated cervix, preparatory to the real enucleation and ablation of what occupied the body of the womb. Accordingly, a cord was passed around it in the direction of the dotted line a (fig. 45), where it was severed. The haemorrhage was fearful, and she lost a large amount of blood before it could be con- trolled by a tampon. She scarcely rallied at all from the effects of the chloroform, and died of exhaustion in thirty-six hours afterwards. FlG I think that death in this case was caused by the unexpected and immense loss of blood that suddenly took place in the brief space of time between the severance of the tumour and its removal from the vagina. The prolonged use of the chloroform in all proba- bility exerted a very pernicious influence. The portion of the tumour removed was so large that it was with great difficulty extracted from the vagina. Indeed, to do this, it was necessary to enlarge the ostium vagina? by perineal incisions, one on each side of the fourchette. A similar case to this was operated on at the Woman's Hospital the year before. That part of the tumour projecting into the vagina was removed by ecrasement, in October, 1859. Our patient recovered from the effects of the anaesthesia and the operation, and we expected to enucleate the remainder of the tumour, when she was suddenly attacked with peritonitis, four months afterwards, which carried her off. 8 114 UTERINE 8URGEEY. In June, 1861, a widow lady, aged 30, who had been for two years subject to menorrhagia, was ad- mitted into the Woman's Hospital. These periodical haemorrhages were profuse and exhausting, and she had all the evidence of extreme anaemia. The os tincae was small, and the cervix firm and indurated, while the body of the organ was felt to be as large as the two fists. The depth of the uterus was five inches. The enlargement and the haemorrhage were evidently due to one of two things — either a fibroid tumour or a polypus. A spouge tent or two enabled the finger to pass into the uterine cavity, when a very firm and unusually hard tumour was found project- ing from the posterior wall of the uterus, having a broad, strong attachment to its whole posterior surface. A puncture was made in that portion of the tumour nearest the cervix, and a large quantity (eight ounces) of a clear, limpid, transparent, straw-coloured serum was evacuated. To make sure of a radical cure, a bit of the sac of this fibro-cystic growth was removed with scissors. It was elliptical, and about one inch and a half long by three quarters of an inch wide. This was done in imitation of Mr. Baker Brown's gouging process. I had seldom felt so well satisfied with an operation ; but unfortunately irritative fever set in, and my patient died of pyaemia in the course of twenty days. These four cases are all that have been subjected to any opera- tion for radical cure in the Woman's Hospital. Two recovered from the operations, but both died within a year afterwards — one from peritonitis; the other from cholerine of a few hours' duration. Two died from the immediate effects of operative pro- cedures — one of these from exhaustion produced by loss of blood aided by chloroform poisoning ; the other OF MENSTRUATION. \ ] 5 from pyaemia. It may be thus literally stated that two died and two recovered ; for death in the last two was due to accidental causes which were most probably independent of the operations. The complete eradication of an intra-uterine fibroid with abroad sessile attachment is exceedingly hazardous, while the removal of an intra-uterine fibroid with a peduncular attachment is comparatively one of the safest operations in surgery. But why take so much time with fibroid tumours? Could the removal of such immense tumours be followed by conception and safe delivery ? It might very well be a question, whether such a hazardous operation as the enucleation of a large fibroid tumour should be performed simply for the removal of sterility, and when the life of the sufferer was not jeopardized by severe haemorrhage. But I could very well imagine cases where it would be justifiable. Suppose a dynasty w r as threatened with extinction, and the cause of sterility was ascertained to be an enucleable fibroid: here the perpetuity of a good government and the welfare of the State might depend upon the result. Or suppose an ancient family of great name, influential position, and large fortune, desirous of perpetuating these noble heritages in a line of direct descent : would such an operation be justifiable, if the parties, knowing the risks, were willing to assume the responsibilities ? But could we promise the possibility of conception after all had been successfully done ? As a rule, while there is menstruation there is ovulation, and any woman that ovulates can be impreg- nated, provided the spermatozoa and the ovum can be brought in contact at the proper time and place, and under favourable circumstances. HQ UTERINE SURGERY. The neck of the uterus may have been destroyed by sloughing, or by other means ; there may be loss of the greater part of the vagina ; there may be partial atresia of it ; there may be an ovarian tumour ; there may be fibroid tumours, pedunculated, sessile, interstitial, or intra-uterine ; there may have been hematocele, pelvic cellulitis, or even carcinoma of the neck of the womb, and yet conception is always possible, provided men- struation, the sign and symbol of ovulation, be such as to warrant a healthy condition of the uterine cavity, the nidus of the new beino;. Our literature teems with cases of delivery compli- cated with fibroid tumours in some part of the uterine structure, and our experience and observation teach us that these tumours are a very frequent source of sterility. But to return to the question — "Is conception possible, and safe delivery probable, after the enuclea- tion and removal of a large intra-uterine fibroid ?" It is not at all uncommon to see this follow the removal of the intra-uterine pedunculated fibroid, called polypus — and why not the sessile fibroid, called intra-uterine fibroid tumour ? But the proof of this is fortunately not left to hypothesis or analogy. And the question is answered affirmatively by the record of one of the most interesting cases to be found in English medical literature, by Mr. Grimsdale,* of Liverpool. The interest of the subject will justify me in extracting the general features of the case from Mr. Grimsdale's published account. * A Case of Artificial Enucleation of a large Fibroid Tumour of the Uterus ; with some Remarks on the Surgical Treatment of these Tumours. By Thomas F. Grimsdale, Surgeon to the Lying-in Hospital, and Lecturer on Diseases of Children, at the Liverpool Royal Infirmary School of Medi- cine. — Liverpool Medico - Chirurgical Journal, January, 1857. OF MENSTRUATION. J If Ou the 12tli October, 1855, Mr. Grimsclale first saw Margaret West, aged 33 years, a stout healthy-looking woman, married three years ; eleven months after marriage (say in 1853) delivered prematurely of a still- born child, profuse Hooding, checked with difficulty ; in 1854 conceived a^ain, but miscarried at three months on Christmas ; this also attended with great flooding ; menstruation very profuse, but regular after this, till three months ago (say in July, 1858) ; supposed herself pregnant, but there was no nausea. The uterus was about the size of this or^an at six months, but without the usual elastic feel of pregnancy. A loud bruit heard all over the tumour, cervix uteri pushed forward, os open, lips everted, hard and granular. Mr. Grimsdale's diagnosis was, "fibroid tumour of the uterus ; probably pregnancy in addition." He watched her for a fortnight. She had occasional profuse discharges of blood. On consultation with Mr. Bickersteth, they agreed that the safety of the patient demanded the in- duction of abortion at once. Sponge tents were used, the cavity probed for seven inches, the tumour found to be adherent to the whole extent of the posterior wall. Mr j Bickersteth made the incision for enucleation with a straight bistoury through the posterior wall of the cervix, about three-quarters of an inch within the canal, and, coming down on the capsule of the tumour, plunged the knife into it ; index finger passed through incision nearly to the second joint, and the tumour was thus separated for some distance from the proper tissue of the uterus. But little bleeding followed the incision, which was plugged, the lint being forced up between the tumour and the uterine wall. 1st day after operation. — Pulse 96 ; vagina hot ; tampon removed ; vagina syringed. I 13 UTERINE SURGERY. 2nd day. — Aborted a four months' foetus and placenta. 1th day. — Bat little variation ; vagina syringed and opening plugged daily. 8th day. — Uterine pains; watery discharge ; tumoui began to protrude through the artificial opening, which was dilated a little more; presenting part of tumour soft ; discharge offensive ; pulse 120 ; countenance pale, anxious ; tongue dry ; thirst. During the next week her condition changed a little for the better. She took beef-tea, opium, ergot, and had- the vagina syringed twice a day. The tumour gradually dilated the artificial os, when, on the 14th day, the fingers could not reach the uterus; the tumour had passed through, so as to fill the upper part of the vagina It was soft and sloughy ; pulse 96. 15th day. — Much worse; had a chill this morning ; since then very low; pulse 112 ; thready; tongue dry ; glazy ; countenance anxious ; very desponding; ordered brandy and beef-tea. 9 p.m. — Messrs. Bickersteth, Blower, and Fitzpatrick present ; pulse a little better, but thrilling ; tongue as before ; countenance bad ; put her under the influence of chloroform, which improved the pulse. Mr. Grimsdale then passed his hand by the side of the tumour into the cavity in the posterior uterine wall, and easily separated the few attachments that remained at its middle and lower portions. He found the great bulk of the tumour soft and sloughy, some- what like the placenta of a child dead some time in utero, and already separate from the uterus. Pos- teriorly, and high up near the fundus, some firm fibrous bands passed from the uterus to the tumour, which resisted all efforts to break through them they OF MENSTRUATION. HQ extended over about three square inches of uterine surface ; there were eight or ten distinct bands — one as large as the finger flattened out, and containing soft sloughy tissue. Finding it impossible to lacerate these bands, he held his hand in the uterus till Mr. Bickersteth went for a large pair of scissors, which occupied some thirty minutes. Even then the completion of the operation was difficult and tedious, for he says — " After continuous efforts for nearly an hour, I succeeded in dividing entirely its attachments, and removed the tumour, a sloughy mass about the size of an ordinary placenta." There was no haemor- rhage, and withdrawing the hand and the tumour, the uterus contracted down exactly as after the extraction of a placenta, and felt externally to be about the size of a normally contracted uterus after an ordinary labour. From this time her restoration to health was gradual, but sure. In a fortnight all fetid discharges had ceased. In two months the uterus had quite recovered its natural size and position, and on the sixty-eighth day after the operation she began to menstruate. It lasted four days, painless and normal in quantity and quality. So far this case is most interesting surgically. If Mr. Grimsdale had not removed the decaying, slough- ing mass as he did on the fifteenth day, his patient would evidently have died of pyaemia in a very short time. But, to me, the most interesting part of the case is to be related. The operation was performed on the 4th November, 1855 ; the tumour removed on the 20th. Menstrua- tion returned on the 27th January, 185G; again on the 25th February ; and she probably menstruated again about the 24th or 25th of March, for in a foot- 120 UTERINE SURGERY. note in Mr. Grimsd ale's report, he says, " Since the above was in type, I have delivered this patient of a well-grown eight-and-a-half months child, stillborn. The membranes ruptured suddenly on the 17th December, 1856. There was a slight discharge of blood soon after, but no pain till the 20th. At this date the fcetal heart-sounds were heard distinctly. The os dilated very slowly ; the presentation was foot- ling; and there was very inefficient expulsive action in the second stas^e of labour. On the morninsr of the 22 nd I got hold of the left foot, and completed the delivery. The child had. evidently been dead many hours, the cuticle of the feet having begun to desqua- mate. It measured twenty-one inches in length, and was plump and well . formed. The placenta, large and healthy-looking, came away immediately, without haemorrhage. The uterus contracted well and remained so." The evident bearing of this case on the subject under consideration is my apology, if any were needed, for giving so minutely its synopsis and sequel. For it is a direct answer to the question, -' Is conception possi- ble and safe deliver)* probable afcer the enucleation and removal of large fibroid tumours?" Before dismissing this subject, I may state that Mr. Baker Brown does not now mutilate the fibroid, but satisfies himself with simply incising the os and cervix uteri. But the most philosophical and, indeed, the most successful treatment of haemorrhages from fibroids is that of Dr. Savage, of the Samaritan Hospital. He dilates the canal of the cervix with a sponge tent, and injects the cavity of the uterus with a solution of iodine, which has been so far both harmless and efficient. His f orniula is this : — OF MENSTRUATION. 121 R Iodine 3 i- loci. Potassium 3 >j. Rect. spt. wine § U- Water % vi. It invariably stops the bleeding, and, he says, when repeated at each occurrence of the flow, for five or six months, the tumours undergo a sensible diminution, and in some instances have entirely dis- appeared. I have seen remarkable results from this treatment of Dr. Savage, and if the experience of others should be as fortunate as his, he will have substituted a simple, safe, and most successful method for one fraught with doubt, difficulty, and danger. Dr. Kouth* follows the plan of Dr. Savage, but substitutes a solution of the perchloride of iron for the iodine. I have used both agents, and the objection that I make to the iron is, that while it arrests the bleeding promptly, by coagulation, it takes two or three days for the uterus to expel the large masses of coagula, which often provoke very severe forcing pains. Whereas when the iodine is used the patient complains only of a little sensation of internal warmth, which is quite transitory. It is very probable that the curative process of Mr. Baker Brown's simple incision of the os, and of Dr. Savage's iodine injection, and Dr. Routh's iron, all depend more or less on bringing about a degree of subacute inflammation in the uterine cavity, for I hear from Dr. Greenhalgh that Mr. Brown's operation when * " On some Points connected with Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treat- ment of Pibrous Tumours of the Womb ; being the Lettsomian Lectures,' &c. By C. H. F. Routh, M.D., &c. London : T. Richards. 18G4. ]_22 UTERINE SURGERY. successful always produces a great degree of consti' tutional disturbance, with considerable tenderness over the whole abdomen, but especially in the uterine region. I had the opportunity of making a post-mortem examination in a case of fibroid tumour, alluded to on page 1 13, where the removal of a portion of the tumour, nearly as large as a foetal head, was followed by a most marked improvement in the hemorrhage. Indeed, after this it could not be called a menorrhasHa. The woman died four months afterwards of an acute attack of peritonitis, lasting but a few days. On opening the abdomen the evidences of this suddenly developed and rapidly fatal disease were everywhere visible. On laying open the uterus there were found strong old adhesions, here and there, firmly uniting the anterior wall of the uterus to the opposite surface of the tumour, which grew from the posterior wall. These bands of adhesion were in all probability the result of the inflammatory action necessarily set up in the part by the recuperative powers of nature after the ablation of the large vaginal portion of the tumour, four months before. This probability is reduced to a certainty when I call to mind the fact that previously to this operation the hand was several times, for the purpose of diagnosis, carried into the uterus, and passed freely and without obstruction between the contiguous surfaces of the uterus and tumour, where they were now found adherent in patches. This condition of things must, then, have been the result of the operation four months before, and was most probably the cause of the great improvement in the menstrual flow. While we admit that good results may follow the incision of the os and cervix uteri, after Mr. Baker OF MENSTRUATION. 123 Brown's plan, and equally good, with less risk, may follow the injecting process, after that of Dr. Savage, 1 believe we are not in accord as to their rationale. I venture to suggest that they act beneficially by bringing about the same result, viz., an endo-metritis, minus the suppurative stage. If this be so, then we should adopt the iodine treatment on theoretical as well as practical grounds, as the one most conducive to the production of plastic or adhesive inflammation. Dr. Greenhalsrh informs me that he has had five successful cases from the iodine and sponge-tent treat- ment, combined with Recaiuier's method of scraping out fungous granulations, and that they were all cured promptly by a single injection for each ; and that both he and Dr. Savage now use the pure undiluted officinal tincture of iodine, instead of the solution. It must not be forgotten that the uterine injection is to be always and invariably preceded by the use of the sponge tent ; that this is an essential part of the treat- ment, and by no means to be neglected, not even if the canal of the cervix should appear to be large enough to permit the easy exit of the fluid. To Dr. Savage we are particularly indebted for this practice, which renders this operation, once most painful and hazardous, now simple and safe. Many years ago I relinquished the practice of inject- ing the cavity of the uterus, having seen the most violent and alarming: attacks of uterine colic follow the injection of but one drop of a bland fluid ; but now, according to the plan of Dr. Savage, the cavity of the uterus is made tolerant of any quantity of even the undiluted tincture of iodine. Of Menorrhagia from Inversion of the Uterus. — » 124 UTERINE SURGERY. Inversion of the uterus is fortunately of rare occurrence, yet as it may happen at any time and in the practice of any one, we shall devote some consideration to it. My countryman, Professor Charles A. Lee,** has given us a very complete monograph on this subject. He has collected from various sources 148 cases, be^innin^ with the writings of Dr. Robert Lee, and ending with those of Dr. Tyler Smith and Professor White, of Buffalo. I would refer the reader to this excellent paper for a large amount of most valuable information which is condensed into a few pages. In many cases of inversion the cause is said to be, pulling on the cord.' It sometimes occurs spontaneously, especially when the labour has been very rapid. It doubtless occasionally happens at a period more or less remote after confinement. But I am disposed to believe that an adherent placenta, particularly to the fundus, is the most frequent direct cause of this accident, whether the cord be pulled upon or not. Some five or six years ago, Dr. Lewis A. Sayre, Professor of Surgery in the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New York, showed me a case of inverted prolapsed uterus, which occurred in a woman who had never borne children. The inver- sion was evidently the consequence of a fibroid polypus attached to the fundus by a short thick unyielding pedicle, which, as it passed through the cervix, must have drawn the fundus with it. This case excited at the time a good deal of interest amongst the medical men connected with the hospital, on account of the obscurity of its history and the difficulties of its diagnosis. The * "A Statistical Inquiry into the Causes, Symptoms, Pathology, and Treatment of Inversion of the Womb." By Charles A. Lee, M.D. — Ameri- oin Journal of the Medical Sciences, October, 1860, pp. 313 to 363. OF MENSTRUATION, 125 woman had passed the time of menstruation ; she there* fore suffered no longer from haemorrhages, but complained only of the mechanical inconveniences of the proci- dentia. Dr. McClintock describes a case so exactly similar to this, that the drawing of it in his book (page 98) would pass for an accurate representation of Dr. Say re's case. Dr. Lee's paper contains references to several cases similar to these, reported respectively by Browne,* Hig- gins,f Oldham, Rigby, Le Blanc, and Velpeau, the last four in " Ashwell on Diseases of Women," pp. 403-5. Dr. Alexander H. Stevens, of New York, has had a chronic case of inverted uterus under observation for more than thirty years. It had existed for some years before he saw it. His patient suffered from periodi- cal haemorrhages, which ceased with change of life, when the inverted organ diminished in size, as it always does at this critical period. The fundus is now not more than half the size that it was during menstrual life. Dr. Charles A. Lee J has seen one of twenty-five years' duration, which had remained undetected till he was consulted. The patient was then forty-five years of ap;e. She had had haemorrhages at intervals, and was quite anemic. In the course of twelve months after- wards (March, 1858) the menses ceased, her health became vigorous, and there was no need of surgical interference. Dr. Lee § quotes one case of congenital inversion, * DubKn Medical Journal, vol. vi. p. 33. f Edinburgh Monthly Journal, July, 1849, p. 889. \ American Journal of the Medical Sciences, October, 1860, p. 340, case 140 § hoc. cit, p. 323. 126 TJTERI3TE SURGERY. reported to the French Academy of Medicine by Dr, Williame, of Metz. His paper also contains two cases of inversion occurring at an earlier period of pregnancy. One of partial inversion, reported by Dr. Spae in the Northern Journal of Medicine, July, 1845 ; the other of complete inversion at the fifth month of pregnancy, by Dr. John A. Brady, in the New Yorlc Medical Times, February, 1856. But the most remarkable case of this sort is that of Dr. Woodson,* of Kentucky. The patient, aged twenty-seven or twenty-eight years, pregnant about four months, was ensraored in washing, some distance from the house, when violent labour pains came on, and she was not able to get home. She was greatly alarmed, felt the foetus protrude from the vagina, and took hold of it and forcibly pulled it away, which brought the uterus entirely out, producing complete inversion. She tore off most of the placenta which was adherent, forced the uterus back into the vagina, and did not call for medical aid for five days afterwards. Dr. Woodson then saw her, in consultation with the family physician ; and found the uterus inverted, lying just within the vagina, with a portion of decomposed placenta still adhering. He ordered vaginal washes and an anodyne for the time, and on the next day, the sixth after the accident, he succeeded in replacing the uterus. The loss of blood was not great or alarming, although it had continued from the time the accident occurred. The replacement of a chronic inversion was formerly thought to be impossible. Now, however, it is proven * American Journal of the Medical Sciences, October, I860, Art. XL, " Complete Inversion of the Uterus at four months of Utero-gestation. Keplaeed six days after the accident." By E. W. Woodson, M.D., of Wood- ville, Kentucky. OF MENSTRUATION. 127 to be not only possible, but quite practicable. Dr. Tyler Smith * replaced one after twelve years of inver- sion. It required eight days with the india-rubber air-ball pessary, conjoined with manipulation night and morning for ten minutes at a time. Dr. Charles West f has replaced one of twelve months' standing. He also used the graduated pressure of an india-rubber air-ball, after Dr. T} T ler Smith's plan. Both of these cases reco- vered. Professor White, J of Buffalo, New York, replaced one of fifteen years' standing. The operation was done in fifty minutes, under chloroform. Unfortunately the patient, thirty-two years of age, died of peritonitis sixteen days afterwards. Dr. Noeggerath, § of New York, has succeeded in one case of thirteen years' standing. This great revolution in practice in the treatment of chronic inversion is due to Dr. Tyler Smith, who was the first, I believe, in this country, to demonstrate its practicability, and to Professor White, who was the first in America to perform this operation successfully. I have had but two cases of chronic inversion. In one, the uterus was removed by the ecraseur ; in the other it was replaced in five minutes under the influence of ether. One had existed for nine months, the other for twelve. One was at the Woman's Hospital ; the other in private practice. The first case was sent to the hospital in June, 1859, by Dr. Maxwell, of Johnstown, New York. This patient, aged thirty-nine, married five years, had * Medical Times and Gazette, April 24th, 1858. t Medical Times and Gazette, October 29th, 1859. \ American Journal of the Medical Sciences, July, 1858. § American Medical Times, April 26th, 1862, p. 230. 128 UTERINE SURQERY. had one miscarriage and two labours at full term, the last on the 26th December, 1858. She was in labour nine hours. The pains continued very strong after the expulsion of the child. The placenta was retained. The physician was obliged to remove it, and in so doing, remarked that something had come down which would have to go back again. The mother of the patient saw a large bleeding mass protruding, which the physician pushed up into the vagina. The haemorrhage and the pains continued for nearly twenty-four hours afterwards. On the next day another physician was called in, who succeeded in checking the haemorrhage and relieving: the constant pains. About a month after delivery, the haemorrhage suddenly returned with great force, but was controlled by a tampon. From this time she was never entirely free from more or less ljsemorrhage, up to the time of her admission to the Woman's Hospital. She was so completely blanched from loss of blood, and so exhausted, that I hardly had a hope of doing anything for her relief. I have seldom seen any one recover from such a state of exhaustion. The pulse was very rapid and feeble, the heart giving full evidence of her anaemic condition. She could not be raised up in bed without fainting, and would often faint while in the recumbent posture. Her recovery from this condition was wholly due to the extraordinary efforts and attention of Dr. Emmet, whose eminent ability I have so often mentioned in these pages. He arrested the flow by a tampon of the liq. ferri persulphatis of Dr. Squibb ; he relieved the disposition to frequent syncope by elevating the foot of the bed, making it an inclined plane, and inviting what little blood she had to the brain ; while by stimulants, tonics, and good nutrition, a little by the stomach and a great deal by the rectum, we had the happiness of seeing OF MENSTRUATION. 129 our patient rally and gain blood and strength enough to undergo operative procedures. We were afraid of chlo- roform in her enfeebled condition. She was therefore cautiously etherized. The hand was then passed into the vagina, the uterus grasped, and steady efforts made to replace the organ. These efforts were continued for nearly four hours. The uterus was partially replaced ; that is, it was reinverted to such a degree as to place the fundus up within the os uteri, but it could not be passed farther. The diagram (fig. 46) would represent what I mean. It took but a short time to reinstate the organ thus far, but no efforts could do more. A tampon, with some styptic lotion, was applied to hold the uterus in situ. And here is where I made the great mistake. If, instead of the styptic tampon, I had adopted Dr. Tyler Smith's, plan with the elastic air-bag, the result might have been different. A day or two afterwards, when the tampon was renewed, I was horrified to discover that the vagina, particularly at its posterior cul-de-sac, had an ecchymosed appearance, as if it had been stretched almost to the verge of being ruptured. I am now satisfied that we continued our efforts for too long a time, although they were not made spasmodically. The tampon was changed daily, the uterus beiDg retained as presented in the diagram. There was no pain, no hemorrhage, and our patient ate and slept well, and improved rapidly in looks and strength. About eighteen days after this (July 12th) Mrs. R. was placed again under the influence of ether, and 9 Pig. 46. 130 UTERINE SURGERY. another effort made to replace the uterus; but after an hour's time we were obliged to desist. The late lamented Drs. Valentine Mott and John W. Francis, of the Consulting Board of the hospital, were both preseut at each trial, and they were of the opinion, that in this case the entire ablation of the organ would be a safer operation than to make another effort to reinvert it. A few days afterwards menstruation came on, was exceedingly profuse, and the fundus was again forced somewhat into the vagina in spite of the tampon. The uterus was then pulled down into the vagina, and a strong ligature was passed round the cervix, and firmly tightened by a small screw ecraseur, with the intention of ultimately removing the organ. The ligature controlled at once the haemorrhage, and wholly arrested the circulation of the fundus, as mani- fested by its sudden deep purple colour. But the con- stitutional disturbance was so intense and alarming that we were compelled to remove the ligature ap- paratus at the end of two hours. The great pain, excessive nausea, rapid pulse, clammy skin, jactitation and pinched features were too distressing to be wit- nessed, much less endured, and so the ligature was removed, and opiates were freely given till she was entirely relieved. A general course of invigorating treatment was followed. Menstruation in August lasted eleven days, but the flow was not very great at any time. After the September menstrual period, one more effort was made to reinvert the uterus ; but we could effect no more than is shown in the diagram (fig. 46). After this she and her husband begged to have the organ removed, as we promised to do it with the ecraseur without "oain. OF MENSTRUATION. 13} Accordingly, on the 1st of November, she was chloroformed, and the chain of the ecraseur was passed round the cervix, near the os, and tightened. When the operation was half finished, a link parted. Another chain was applied, and with this the organ was cut through ; but the broad ligament on the right side was fortunately not wholly severed. As the chain was felt to pass suddenly through the uterine tissue, I was about to remove it and the severed tumour together, when all at once the most fearful haamorrha^e I ever encountered took place, and in an instant the vagina was full of arterial blood. If the bleeding had been from the blood-vessels of that portion of the broad ligament already severed and retracted within the peritoneal cavity, it would have been beyond reach, and, of course, our patient would have died before she could have reco- vered from the effects of the chloroform. Fortunately, the bleeding was from that part of the broad ligament still adherent to the severed uterus. Quickly drawing it forward, I passed the fore and middle fingers through the cervix uteri into the abdominal cavity, and with them compressed the remains of the ligament against the edge of the cervical opening, which promptly arrested the haemorrhage. The blood was then sponged out of the vagina, and the undivided portion of the broad ligament with the artery was tied ; after which a few sponge probangs were passed into the peritoneal cavity, and the blood that had found its way there was carefully removed. It must not be forgotten that the patient was in the usual lateral semi-prone position. The divided edges of the cervix were united by five or six interrupted silver sutures. The one on the extreme right was made to transfix the ligated portion of the broad ligament, which had 132 UTERINE SURaERY. been drawn through into the vagina. The edges of the cervix united by the first intention. The opening through the cervix, before it was closed by the sutures, would easily have admitted the passage of three fingers at a time into the peritoneal cavity. This was rather a fortunate thing under the circum- stances, as it afforded great facility for sponging out the blood from the peritoneal cavity. The patient recovered rapidly. Dr. Emmet gave her opiates at stated intervals for two or three days, with good nutriment. She bad a small vaginal discharge for a short time, till the little projecting portion of broad ligament was removed. Ten days after the operation the bowels were opened by enemata. Two of the sutures were cut off close, and left to be permanently sacculated. I have occasionally heard from Mrs. K. since the operation, and she remained in good health. This cut (fig. 47) is copied from a drawing made mam Fig. 47. immediately after the uterus was removed. It shows that portion of the ligament in which the bleeding artery was found. The artist has slightly exaggerated the long diameter of the organ. OF MENSTRUATION. 133 With mv next case I was more fortunate. This was a case of a lady in Springfield, Massachusetts, who was attended in her labour by one of the most eminent of our New England practitioners. I presume it was an example of spontaneous inversion at. a some- what remote period after confinement, for the character of the physician is a sufficient guarantee that it could not have resulted from any mismanagement on his part; nor could it have occurred spontaneously at the time of his attendance without being detected by him A few weeks after this lady's delivery, her physician went abroad. Some months afterwards she called another physician, who treated her for menorrhagia. She did not improve ; and by-and-by a consultation was held, when the case was ascertained to be one of inversion. She was then etherized, and efforts at reduction were made, and continued for an hour without effect. Two or three weeks after this I was sent for ; the patient was etherized as before, and I was able to reduce the inverted uterus to its normal relations in less than five minutes. This was in May, 1860, about twelve months after the labour. The medical brethren present gave me great credit for the facility with which the operation was performed. But its speedy accom- plishment was a little accidental. Introducing the left hand into the vagina, I grasped the uterus, and soon restored it to the position represented by fig. 46 (page 129), where the fundus is shown as just within the os uteri. At this moment I changed my hold on the uterus, and, rather by accident than design, deeply indented the right cornu, «, with the thumb of the left hand; the fingers compressed the opposite side of the organ, b, and while the thumb pushed the tissue 134 UTERINE SURGERY. in which it was imbedded upwards, the fingers rather acted in a contrary direction on the opposite side ; and to my great surprise, the uterus jumped, as it were, out of my hand, assuming its proper normal position. I certainly had not the remotest idea of restoring the organ under a half-hour's effort. The case reported by Dr. Noeggerath was reduced very much on the principle of the above ; but instead of its being accidental, as with me, he reasoned out the process after he had failed by the ordinary method. As before said, we are indebted to Dr. Tvler Smith, of London, and Professor White, of Buffalo, for our present success in the treatment of inversion of the uterus. These two distinguished gentlemen seem to have worked out the problem about the same time, and independently of each other. Dr. Tyler Smith takes the slower method of persistent and gradual pressure with the air-bag; Dr. White, the more brilliant but more dangerous plan of immediate reduction by manipulation, under the influence of chloroform. I fear that in my own country we have been too much captivated by the eclat of sudden success. I am sure now that it would be safer to combine the plans of Dr. Tyler Smith and Dr. White. I would hesitate a long time before removing another inverted uterus. Judging from the experience of my two cases, the great difficulty seems to be in passing the fundus through the os internum. It was easy enough in each instance to reinstate the organ to the condition represented by the diagram (fig. 46). That being the case, I should infer that there were no peritoneal adhesions to prevent the completion of the operation. UTERINE SURGERY. 135 There is one point that I wish to dwell on particu- larly. Those who follow the plan of my distinguished countryman Professor White (whom I have imitated), would do well always to make counter-pressure with the outer hand over the abdomen, as represented in this diagram (fig. 48). In pushing the uterus upwards by the hand in the Fig. 48. vagina, there is certainly some danger of lacerating the vagina and tearing the uterus asunder from its attach- ments at the posterior cul-de-sac. Counter-pressure will obviate that danger. Another advantage of counter- pressure is that the fingers pushed down on the uterus, as the cervix is doubled on itself, assist very materially in dilating that portion through which the fundus is to be forced upwards. From what I have already said, it would appear that the reduction of an inverted uterus naturally divides itself into two stages : the first, that of pushing the bodv of the uterus up within the cervix, as represented in fig. 136 UTERINE SURGERY. 45 ; and the second, that of completing the operation by forcing the fundus through the os internum. The first stage is accomplished by directly pressing the body of the uterus upwards, and putting the vagina well on the stretch, which, as Dr. White* says, '* pulls open, first its mouth, then its neck, and finally, if persevered in, doubles the body upon itself also ; " the second, by compressing the fundus laterally, and deeply imbedding the thumb in the cornus uteri (fig. 46, a), by which means we slide one-half of the organ at a time through the os internum instead of the whole fundus, which presents a greater diameter. Pressure antero-posteriorly would avail nothing, because we would simply compress two flat unyielding surfaces together ; but the cornus can be dimpled and forced inwards and upwards by the thumb. It is useless to attempt this manoeuvre till we complete the first stage of the operation. I do not think that, as a rule, we should continue our operative procedures more than thirty minutes at a time. If we fail to restore the organ at once, then we should introduce an india-rubber air-bag, after the plan of Dr. Tyler Smith, and wait for our patient to recover fully before trying again. But suppose after proper efforts we fail to restore the uterus, should we amputate it ? In the hands of Professor Channing, of Boston, and Dr. M'Clintock, of Dublin, amputation of the inverted uterus has proved to be a very successful operation, and one to be justified if all legitimate means of restoration, patiently and perseveringly tried, fail to reinstate the inverted organ. * American Journal of the Medical Sciences, July, 1858, p. 23. OF MENSTRUATION. 137 Pig. 49, But before taking this last resort, I would, rather than amputate, make longitudinal incisions from the os tincaB along the cervix to a point beyond the os internum, for the purpose of facilitating the process of reduction. I would make at least three — one on each side, as represented in this diagram (fig. 49, a a), and another similar on the posterior surface. I say posterior only because it would be easier to make it there than on the anterior surface if the patient be on the left side, with my speculum as it is ordinarily used. The object of these incisions would be to divide the circular fibres of the uterine tissue, and thereby to remove one of the principal barriers to the reduction of the fundus. I hope I have said enough to show that we should not resort to the operation of amputation till we have tried persistently and patiently every possible means for reinstating the organ to its normal position. The patient in whom I was so fortunate as to restore the organ after twelve months of inversion, subsequently conceived; and thus we see the important bearing of this operation upon the subject of sterility. Even Dr. Tyler Smith's successful case of reduction after nearly twelve years of inversion, was followed by conception ; and these two cases are, I think, sufficient to warn us against a too hasty resort to the operation of amuuta- o tioii I have just heard from Dr. Tyler Smith (July 12th, 186/)), that his patient "lias had several children since the operation (in 1856), and that the medical man who 138 UTERINE SURGERY. attended her in her first confinement after the reduction of the inversion, says that complete inversion occurred spontaneously after that confinement, which he readily and at once reduced." Of Painful Menstruation. — Menstruation may be attended by a general malaise, but should not, as a rule, be accompanied by any very severe degree of suffering. If there is much pain, either preceding its irruption or during the flow, there will generally be a physical condition to account for it, and this will be of a nature to obstruct mechanically the egress of the fluid from the cavity of the womb. The obstruction may be the result of inflammation and attendant turgescence of the cervical mucous membrane, whereby this canal becomes narrowed merely by the tumefaction of its lining coat. But by far the most frequent cause of obstruction is purely anatomical and mechanical. For instance, the os and canal of the cervix uteri may be preternaturally small, or the cervix may be flexed ; or these may be complicated with the presence of a polypus, or with that of a fibroid tumour, in either the anterior or poste- rior wall of the uterus, and occasionally in the antero- lateral portion. Of 250 married women who had never borne chil- dren, 129, or more than half, had pain of an abnormal kind attending the menstrual flow. I have been in the habit of dividing these into two classes, calling the one painful, and the other excessively painful or dysmenor- rhoeal. Of these 129, 100 were painful, or 1 in 2£ of the whole number ; 29 were dysmenorrhceal, or 1 in 8^0. Of the 100 painful menstruations, 58 had ante ver- sion, or more properly speaking, anteflexion ; 17 of these had fibroid tumours in the anterior wall : 25 had retro- OF MENSTRUATION. 139 version; 7 of these had fibroid tumours in the posterior wail ; and in 17 the position was normal, one of these having a fibroid tumour. Of the 29 dysmenorrhceal cases, 23 had ante version ; 14 of these had fibroid tumours in' the anterior wall : 3 had retroversion ; all of these had fibroid tumours in the posterior wall : and in 3 the position was normal. Of the 100 cases of painful menstruation, the os was normal in but 6, unnaturally contracted in 90, otherwise abnormal in 4. Of the 29 cases of dysmenorrhoea, properly speaking, the os was not normal in a single case, being contracted in 26, and otherwise abnormal in the other 3. The following tabular statement presents the parti- culars at a glance : — f Os was normal in but -» _.« „ . „. „ contracted in Of 100 cases ol painful men- j ~ n .. . < Cervix was Hexed in struatioo, Of 29 cases of excessively painful menstruation, ,, congested in b There were polypi in ' Os was normal in . . „ contracted in . Cervix was flexed in . „ had polypi in „ was congested in 6 90 61 7 2 26 23 2 1 From this it would appear that the pain of menstru- ation is almost wholly due to mechanical causes, for of the whole 129, only 8 had engorgement or congestion of the linins: membrane of the canal of the cervix, and some of these were complicated either with flexure of the cervix, or with fibroid growths in some portion of the body of the uterus. I would not deny that men- struation may be painful merely from a congested state of the cervical membrane, where there is no fibroid growth, no polypus, no contracted os, and no flexure of 140 UTERINE SURGERY. the cervix ; but such cases are rare, while the great majority of dysmenorrhoeal cases have a contracted os and a narrowed cervical canal or a flexed one. In some instances the os is not larger than a pin's head, or it may be large enough to admit a No. 4 bougie. Again, the os may be quite large enough, but the canal may be flexed so as to form a valvular obstruction to the egress of the menstrual fluid. Sometimes we find the os small and the canal flexed without painful menstruation, and here the cervix is not indurated, but soft and elastic to the touch. Of the 129 cases of painful menstruation, but 20 had the uterus in its normal position, while 81 had anteversion (31 of these with fibroids in anterior wall), 28 retroversion (10 of these with fibroids). In a great many cases, in addition to a contraction or flexure of the canal, the cervix will be long, pointed, and indurated. If the flexure be anteriorly, we often find the intravaginal portion of the cervix unequally developed — that is, the posterior part, from the os to the insertion of the va- gina at a (fig. 50) may be an inch and a quarter long, while the ante- rior, from the os to the insertion of the anterior cul-de-sac at b : may not be more than one-third as long. The size of the os and the position and relations of the cervix may be ascertained by the touch, as already explained (p. 9). But it is well always to resort to the sound to determine definitely the course, curvature, and contraction of the canal. To the touch and the sight the os may seem to be quite large enough, and then we may find a flexure, perhaps a very acute one, at the Fig. 50. OF MENSTRUATION". 14 [ junction of the cervix and body of the womb, due most probably to the presence of a small fibroid in the ante- rior wall of the uterus (fig. 41, page 105). According to the facts stated above, it would seem that the pathology of dysmenorrhoea is yet to be written. I am fully of the opinion that it is simply a sign or symptom of disease, to be found in some abnormal organic condition. This may be inflammation, or it may be the cause of inflammation, or it may exist without it. But whether inflammatory or not, its action is mechanical. I lay it down as an axiom, that there can be no dysmenorrhoea, properly speaking, if the canal of th° neck of the womb be straight, and large enough to permit the free passage of the menstrual blood. In other words, that there must be some mechanical obstacle to the egress of the flow at some point between the os internum and the os externum, or throughout the whole cervical canal. Dr. Bennet* says, "I have always taught that menstruation may be painful, even acutely painful, from its dawn to its close, without any mischief or impediment existing of any kind whatever." Many years ago I believed all this, simply because Dr. Benuet and others said so ; but now I do not believe in any such doctrine, because experience has taught me otherwise. There is no such thing as what is called " constitutional dysmenorrhoea." There was a time when we looked upon dropsy as an entity, a disease in itself; but now we know that it is only a symptom of various diseases. It is a symptom of disease of the heart, of the kidneys, of the liver; or it may follow haemorrhages or diarrhoea. So is it with * Lancet, June 24, 1865, p. 673. 142 UTERINE SURGERY. dysmenorrhea: it is only a symptom of disease, which may be inflammation of the cervical mucous membrane ; retroflexion; anteflexion; fibroid tumour in one wall of the uterus or the other; contraction of the os internum or os externum ; flexures of the canal of the cervix, either acute or gently curved, either at the os internum, at the insertion of the vagina, or extend- ing throughout the whole length of the canal : all of w T hich are but so many mechanical causes of obstruction, which must be recognized and remedied if we expect to cure the dysmenorrhea. We do not talk of constitutional toothache, of constitutional colic, or of constitutional fractures, or constitutional dis- locations. Nor should we speak of " constitutional dysmenorrhoea." This is but a high-sounding term that means absolutely nothing. The fact is, that most of the diseases of the uterus are as purely surgical as are those of the eye, and require the same nice discrimination of the true surgeon. And if we fail to detect the abnormal condition that produces dis- eased manifestations, whe'ther of sensation or secretion, it is plainly our fault. For of all organs the uterus is now most subservient to the laws of physical ex- ploration ; and in every case of diseased action, if we cannot map out accurately the peculiar condition of the uterus producing or accompanying it, it is simply because we do not apply our knowledge of those physi cal laws to its investigation. The treatment of dysmenorrhea was formerly very empirical. Dewees cured many cases with his ammo- niated tincture of guaiacum, but I have not seen any one who had derived the least benefit from it. The remedy is so nauseous that I could never get a patient to persevere with it. I must confess, however, that of OF MENSTRUATION. 143 late years, since I Lave learned more intimately the nature of the disease, I have not prescribed it at all. My friend Professor E. D. Fenner * of New Orleans, has been very successful with the bichloride of mercury in minute doses; but I have no experience with the remedy. Many prescribe belladonna and other nar- cotics, but they can only produce a merely palliative effect. The operation of enlarging the canal by incision is not always successful, but it is the only procedure from which I have derived the least benefit. The whole philosophy of the operation consists in opening the canal and keeping it open, so as to allow the easy passage of the menstrual flow. M'Intosh dilated the cervix with bougies ; but whoever has followed him must have been struck with the uncer- tainty of the result, as well as with its painfulness, to say nothing of its danger. A priori, it would seem a trifling thing to pass a bougie along the cervix uteri, but I have known it to be followed by most serious results. In 1859, Professor Metcalfe, of New York, referred one of his sterile clysmenorrhoeal cases to my care. There was slight anteversion, with a small fibroid in the anterior wall. The os was very small ; the cervix long, pointed, and indurated ; and the canal, though straight, was very narrow. I advised the operation of incising the os and cervix, which was objected to by the lady, although Professor Metcalfe was anxious to have it done. I explained to her the process of dilatation, and she wished to try it. Accordingly, a small bougie was passed in to the depth of two inches, and allowed to remain a few minutes. On the next day a larger one was used, and * New Orleans Medical News, 1858. 144 UTERINE SURGERY. in two or three days more a conical bougie was passed dilating the os externum to about a No. 9. She com« plained of a good deal of pain at the time, and there was a slight laceration of the contracted os. That night she had a rigor, followed by fever, and a most intense attack of metro-peritonitis, which lasted many weeks, and from which she barely escaped with her life. Her recovery was slow and tedious. This was my last bougie case. I have known several cases of the same sort in the hands of others in my own country, and I have seen two in Paris during my short sojourn there. In November, 1861, in Paris, a medical friend asked me to see a case of dysmenorrhcea, which was sterile after a marriage of eight or nine years. The os aud cervical canal were very small; the cervix long, pointed, and indurated. It was just the case for an operation, or there was nothing to be done. I advised him to incise the cervix. He was afraid of it, and a year afterwards he introduced a screw bougie made of ivory deprived of its earthy constituents, which was allowed to remain in the cervix, and dilate it mechani- cally by absorbing moisture, and expanding to twice its original size. A violent attack of metro-peritonitis was the consequence, and I saw this lady when she had been ill about a week. She had a pulse of 140, and continued in a very dangerous condition for a long time, but eventually recovered. The other case of metro-peritonitis from mechanical dilatation occurred in the hands of one of the most eminent physicians in Paris. Fortunately the lady recovered after three weeks of fever, attended with very great suffering. This experience warns against merely mechanical OF , MENSTRUATION. 145 dilatation. But it may reasonably be asked, "Is it more dangerous than splitting up the neck of the womb?" I answer, "Yes." I cannot now say how many hundreds of times (certainly more than five hundred) the operation of cutting open the os and cervix has been done by Dr. Emmet, and myself at the Woman's Hospital and in private practice, and I now remember but a single instance in which it was followed by inflammatory symptoms, and this resulted in pelvic cellulitis and abscess. The case was badly chosen for operation, and if I had known that this patient had had a pelvic abscess once before, I certainly should not have operated on her. The house-surgeon of the hospital inadvertently overlooked this part of the history of the case, and hence the accident. Some prefer to dilate the cervix by sponge tents. Foremost amongst these stand the distinguished names of Bennet and Tilt. I have tried this method, and the results were anything but satisfactory. Professor A. K. Gardner, of New York, has used it most extensively and perse veringly, but has now abandoned the practice as unfruitful. Dr. Tilt thinks the incision of the cervix "an unjustifiable operation,"* and objects to it because it produces pain and " flooding to an alarming, if not to a fatal extent." As to the pain, I am sure I have seen far more caused by a bougie than I ever saw by the operation. Indeed the operation is not a painful one. I have often performed it on delicate, timid women, who were conscious that something was being done, but had no idea that it was a surgical operation. I am opposed to operating on any rational being without first explain- ing what is to be done, and the wherefore. In the cases * " Uterine Therapeutics," p. 255. 10 ^46 UTERINE SURGERY. alluded to the operations were performed at the sugges- tion and earnest wish of husbands, who feared that they might not be submitted to if fully explained. In 1858 I advised this operation in a case of dys- menorrhceal sterility, sent to me by Dr. Vanderpoel, of Albany, New York. There was anteflexion, with slight hypertrophy of the anterior wall, curved canal, and contracted os. The Doctor had tried the bougie system for some time without any permanent improvement, and, fully satisfied that an operation was necessary, he sent his patient to me. But the very idea of cutting was so terrible to her imagination that she went to another physician, who pronounced the operation " butcherous " and dangerous, and promised to cure her by dilatation alone. Of course this poor frightened, nervous sufferer gladly accepted the alternative, and at once placed herself under his treatment. She remained in New York for several months, undergoing daily dilatation, and then returned home without any permanent benefit. Three months afterwards she consulted me again, and on examination I found the uterus just as it was seven or eight months before. Being now fully convinced that the operation afforded the only hope of relief, she submitted to it. When it was all over she could hardly believe it, and declared that she suffered more each time the bougie was used than she did from the operation. But so far as mere pain is concerned, it might be left entirely out of the question in these days of anaesthesia. When, however, we come to speak of the dangers of the procedure, I readily admit that we may debate that point. If, then, we compare the dangers of the opera- tion with those of mechanical dilatation, I do not hesi- tate a moment to declare the former much the safer. OF MENSTRUATION ]_£« while in permanent results it is infinitely superior. For A r bilel have frequently known pelvic cellulitis to follow the use of the bougie and the tent, I have never seen it but once after the operation ; and while the bougie and the tent can only produce temporary improvement, we know that the operation is often followed by a perfect and persistent cure. But it may be asked, is there no risk in the operation? The only trouble that I have encountered is haemorrhage ; but that was in my early operations, and before experience taught me that there was any danger to be apprehended. Now, however, I have no such accident, because I take pains to guard against it. When Dr. Simpson first published on the subject, he said he never had haemorrhage or other unfavourable result, either directly or secondarily ; so that I was emboldened to perform the operation at my house, and allow patients to ride home afterwards. But I was soon undeceived on this point, for in the short space of two months I had five cases of haemorrhage that w r ere truly alarming. One occurred in a lady residing in Jersey city, who rode a distance of five miles in stages after the operation. The bleeding began just as she arrived at her home. She was, of course, very much alarmed, and sent immediately for me, and also for her family physician, who, being near by, soon arrived, removed the dressing, retamponed the vagina, and arrested the bleeding promptly, before I made my frightened appearance. The other cases, though nearer to me, were equally alarming. I then made up my mind never again to operate on patients in the consulting room. I asked Dr. Simpson, when I was in Edinburgh in August, 1861, if the operation was still as safe in his hands as he had at first represented it, telling him, at 148 UTERINE SURGERY. the same time, my experience, when lie declared that be never had any trouble from bleeding. How to account for this difference in our experience I could not imagine, unless it should be that I cut more extensively than he did. To satisfy my mind on this score Dr. Simpson kindly invited me to witness the operation in his hands. It was the case of a lady from some of the British possessions. The os was small ; the canal narrow; the cervix long, pointed, and indurated. It was precisely the case to justify the operation, for the gristly induration of the cervix rendered any other method quite out of the question. The operation was performed with the Doctor's usual dexterity. Then a camel's hair pencil, saturated with a solution of the per- chloride of iron, was thrust into the vagina two or three times, and in ten or fifteen minutes from the time we entered the lady's apartment, we were in the street making other visits. He had such confidence in the operation and in his styptic that he did not wait for consequences. Before the operation, he requested me to examine the condition of the cervix uteri by the touch, and I found it as already described. After- wards 1 repeated the touch, and found the cervix as thoroughly divided from the os externum to the os internum as it was possible to do it, proving that the difference in our experience as to haemorrhage did not depend upon any difference in the extent of the operation. I do not pretend to account for the fact, that the operation is not followed by haemorrhage in Scotland while it is in America ; and I would warn my own countrymen to take every precaution against its occurrence, as it is almost the only accident that can attend this operation. I may be pardoned for pressing this subject a little OF MENSTRUATION. 149 farther. I look upon this operation, simple as it is, a9 one of the great surgical advances of the day ; and I am so well satisfied of its merits, that I would warn young men to he careful not to bring it into discredit by permitting an accidental complication that should never under any circumstances be allowed to take place. I know a most talented, promising young physician in my own country, whose reputation was well nigh ruined by blindly following authority, and operating with the belief that there was no danger from bleeding. Having been taught to look upon the operation as a trifling one, devoid of all risk, he unguardedly operated on his patient at his own house, and allowed her in a few hours afterwards to ride home, a distance of four or five miles. Haemorrhage unfortunately supervened ; the doctor was sent for; he was not at home. Some time elapsed before he could be found, and when he reached his patient she was in a collapse from loss of blood from which fthe never recovered. This is the only well- authenticated case of death from haemorrhage that I have known to follow this operation. Of course it could not have happened but for the overweening confidence of the surgeon in the innocuousness of the operation, and it should never happen again. Such an accident as this may be smothered up in a great city, but if it occurs in the hands of a country practitioner, it may wholly ruin him for ever. The case above alluded to happened in a small country village, and the public excitement may be imagined when everybody began to discuss the subject, and to censure a noble young physician for causing the sudden death of a citizen who was supposed to enjoy the most vigorous health. An eminent professor of obstetrics testified that the operation was a recognized |50 UTERINE SURGERY. justifiable one; that it had been well done, and that death was the result of a rare and unexpected accident. This testimony was corroborated by others, and thus the popular indignation was appeased, aud the young practitioner reinstated in public confidence. But it may be asked, is there no other danger ? I can only here reiterate what I have before stated, that out of the hundreds operated on in the Woman's Hospital and in my private practice, I have seen but the one case of pelvic cellulitis already noticed, which is the only risk of the operation that I know of. While this has occurred but once in my hands from the operation, it has happened frequently under my observation as the result of mechanical dilatation by bougies and sponge tents. The position I take is this : that, as a rule, the operation is less painful than the use of the bougie, which must be repeated for months ; that it is entirely devoid of danger from haemorrhage, provided we exer- cise ordinary prudence in the after-treatment ; that it is less frequently followed by pelvic inflammation than either the bougie or the sponge tent ; that it is more certain and permanent in its results than either or both ; and that, if we exclude it, there are great numbers of curable cases which would be placed beyond the pale of treatment. Thus, from my stand-point of view, the operation, when indicated, is always to be j)referred to any and all other means of enlarging the cervical canal. T am surprised to find that this operation is so seldom performed in Great Britain out of Edinburgh. In London it is condemned by the great body of the profes- sion, although performed by several eminent men. But where we find one man to uphold it, we may point to OF MENSTRUATION. J 5 \ scores who oppose it. This cannot long remain so ; foi where honesty, intelligence, aud earnest inquiry reign supreme, as they do here, the truth must and will prevail. On the 'Continent, so far as I know, this operation is almost completely ostracized. When I went to Paris in September, 18(52, a lady of very high position asked my opinion in reference to her sterility. She had been married thirteen years without issue. On examination, I was convinced that conception could never by any possibility occur unless the neck of the womb were well opened by incision. All sorts of mechanical dilatation had already been fruitlessly employed, producing metro- peritonitis, and leaving the os and cervix as contracted as at the beginning. When the husband asked me, u What are the risks of the operation?" I replied, "In America or England nothing but haemorrhage, and that we control. I cannot say what they would be in Paris, for here you have erysipelas often following the most trifling wounds. Ask your own surgeon about it." They sent for my friend Professor Nelaton, who said that in France the operation would be attended with great risk to life. Such a decision from such an authority of course put the operation wholly out of the question for the time being. However, soon after this I had the good fortune to meet Sir Joseph Olliffe, who invited me to perform the operation on one of his patients in the upper ranks of life. When I told him what I have related above, he said he was perfectly familiar with British and American literature on the subject, and knowing the safety of the operation, would assume all responsibility in the matter. This operation, the first of the sort that I did in Paris, was performed on the 31st of October, 18G2, for Sir Joseph Olliffe, 1 52 UTERINE SURGERY. His patient recovered without the slightest trouble ; and on the 2nd of December we operated on the lady whose case was first mentioned. To guard against any risk from the atmosphere of Paris, we went to their chateau, not many leagues from the city. The case got well rapidly, as usual, and conception fortunately occurred seven or eight months afterwards. She is now (Septem- ber, 1865) the happy mother of two beautiful children, — one a boy, sixteen months old ; the other a girl, less than a month old ; and this after a sterile marriage of thirteen years. I am a little minute in this merely historical part of the introduction of the operation into France, for I wish to show that it may be done as well and as safely there as elsewhere. My third case was that of a native, and I went with her to the country to perform the operation. The next was an American, operated on in Paris ; then another American ; and then I began to operate on natives of France, and in the city of Paris, with the same fearless- ness that I did on Americans. I may be excused for these minute details ; for as the operation was condemned by the highest authority in France, it was important, not so much for myself as for the advancement of surgery, that I should exercise every precaution to guard against accident or untoward results. I have performed this operation twenty-four times on the Continent without accident, except the occurrence of haemorrhage in one case on the sixth day after operation, which was promptly controlled by Sir Joseph Olliffe in my absence. My patients varied in age from twenty-two to forty. They were natives of France, Vienna, Frankfort, England, Scotland, Ireland, and the United States. The operations were performed in the autumn, winter, spring, and summer. ' Twenty OF MENSTRUATION. J 53 were done in Paris, two near Paris, and two at Baden ; and in all there was the same rapid and safe recovery from the effects of the operation as I had always seen in New York. Of course this small number of successful operations is not enough to establish fully its acclimatiza- tion and its claims to universal favour there ; but they are certainly sufficient to attract the notice and consideration of the profession in France. But we were speaking of painful menstruation and its almost invariable concomitants, contracted os and narrowed cervical canal ; and having said so much in a general way about the various methods of overcoming these, we may now proceed to discuss the plan of ope- rating, together with the after-treatment necessary to protect against haemorrhage and to ensure a patulous canal. For the operation of incising the os and cervix uteri, we are indebted to Dr. Simpson. His method is followed by most operators, both in my country and in this. He places his patient on the left side, introduces the index finger of one hand into the vagina, pushes the fundus uteri up if it be ante verted, passes his uterotome (fig. 51) along the cervix through the os internum, springs the blade, and withdraws the instrument, cutting open one Fig. 51. side of the cervix ; then reintroducing the instrument, the other side is cut in like manner ; thus making a bilateral incision of the cervix larare enough to allow the index finger to be passed to the os internum ; and, as 154 UTERINE SURGERY. before stated, he then passes into the vagina a large camel's-hair pencil, saturated with a solution of the perchloride of iron. Dr. Greenhalgh has modified Dr. Simp- son's instrument by giving it two blades, which cut through both sides of the cervix at once, thus ensuring an equilateral unifor- mity of section that cannot always be predi- cated of the single-bladed instrument. His instrument (fig. 52) is a masterpiece of ingenuity, and answers well in his prac- tised hands. But I object to both these methods, because they are done in the dark, and too much is left to the execution of a machine instead of the judgment of the surgeon. Suppose it were necessary to amputate an elongated uvula, — by no means an uncommon operation, — would it be judi- cious to run one finger down the throat and guide by it some machine for performing the operation in the dark? Or would it be more surgical and more precise to look into the throat, seize the part with a proper appliance, and amputate it where our judg- ment would determine to be risrlit and best for the individual case? There are ope- rations that must be done by the touch alone ; but we never select this plan if it be possible to aid the manipulatory process by the sight. Besides the objections already urged against instruments of this class, there is another to which all instruments on the principle of cutting from Fig. 52. OF MENSTRUATION. 155 above downwards are obnoxious — viz., that as the ute- rus is uot fixed, it may glide upwards to some extent by the mere centrifugal force of the expanded blade or blades, and thus we can never feel altogether certain of the length and breadth of the cut. Whether too much O or too little, it is not safely remediable afterwards. The operation, as I prefer to perform it, differs from Dr. Simpson's, not in its aim and scope, but merely in its mechanical execution. He and his followers operate in the dark ; I bring everything plainly into view. They cut from within outwards ; I, in the contrary direction, from the os externum upwards to the cavity of the womb. They, as a rule, do not tampon the vagina after the operation ; I always do, for the double purpose of guarding agaiust haemorrhage and ensuring an open os. I place the patient on the left side, as for all the operations in uterine surgery. The speculum (fig. 5, p. 18) is introduced ; a small tenaculum is hooked into the central portion of the anterior lip of the os tincse ; the uterus is gently pulled forwards ; one blade of a pair of curved scissors is passed into the canal of the cervix till the outer one comes almost in contact with the insertion of the vagina on the side of the cervix, and the portion thus embraced is divided at one blow of the scissors. Then the opposite side is in like manner divided, and the operation is almost finished (fig. 53). It only remains, while the uterus is still held in position by the tenaculum, to sponge away the blood, and pass a narrow- bladed, blunt-pointed knife (at a proper angle with its handle) and divide the small amount of tissue on each side) leading from the scissor-cuts up to the very cavity of the womb. The scissors never cut the whole amount of tissue embraced between the blades. They will spring 256 UTERINE SURGERY "back a little, making only a deep notch on each side of the os. The advantage of cutting the edges of the os with Fig. 53. scissors is that we make the incisions perfectly equilateral and symmetrical. Fig. 54 [I now often use scissors with short straight blades, but curved above the joint, as here shown.] Fig. 55 represents the knife with the blade in proper position for cutting the left side of the canal. To cut the right side, it is necessary to turn the blade in the opposite direction, as shown by the dotted line. The blade may be fixed firmly at any angle by the screw at the end of the handle, which drives a shaft up into little holes, as seen in fig. 56, where the razor-shape of the blade is also shown. The operation is quickly OF MENSTRUATION. 157 Fig. 55. m Fig. 56. done, and the judgment . of the surgeon deter- mines whether the pe- culiarities of the case demand more or less cut- ting. The haemorrhage is usually unimportant, but sometimes it is profuse ; and I have occasionally seen it come with such a rush that the vagina would be filled before a set of sponges could be washed out. But there is nothing to be feared. Press one or two sponge probangs (fig. 57) right into the neck of the uterus, but at the same time be sure to keep the organ firmly fixed by the tenaculum ; for if the bleeding be profuse, it is a very awkward and unlucky thing to let it slip out, par- ticularly if the vagina is lax and deep. A minute or two will usu- ally suffice to control the bleeding by the pressure of the probangs. When that is done, the dressing may be proceeded with. Two or three small pieces of cot- ton, large enough when moistened to fill up the gaping os, are to be thoroughly saturated with water, then squeezed as dry as possible, and afterwards wetted in a mixture of one part of Deleau's neutral solution of the perchloride of iron with four or five parts of water, or in Dr. Squibb's liq. ferri persulphatis similarly dilut- ed. Squeeze out the superfluous fluid, and place a bit of the cotton in an angle of the wound, pressing a por- 158 UTERINE SURGERY. tion of it up into the cervical canal, and holding it in place with the sponge probang. Apply another bit of cotton similarly prepared on the op- posite side, and press it down with another sponge probang- If necessary, another portion of cotton may be placed cen. trally; then, if there is no bleeding, some cotton wet with water or glycerine, may be laid over the neck of the womb, to be covered with dry cotton to the extent of sup- porting the whole dressing neatly and comfortably in its place. The patient is put to bed, having been perhaps five or six minutes on the table. She eats and drinks as usual, but the recumbent pos- ture is enjoined for a few days. She may pass water lying, or it may be drawn off. The only object of the recumbent posture is to ensure the retention of the dressing in situ. I formerly allowed my patients to sit up and walk about the room the day after the opera- tion ; but I was so often annoyed by the supervention of haemorrhage that I at length adopted the plan of keeping them down till the spontaneous separation of the intra-cervical dressing. On the day after the operation, the whole of the vaginal portion of the tampon is to be carefully removed ; placing the patient in the position as for the operation, and using the speculum, which must be introduced so as Fig. 57. [This cut is introduced here simply to show the mechanism of the sponge-holder, and the proper size of the sponge. We often use too large a sponge to be passed with ease into the cervix. We should have a few much smaller than this.] OF MENSTRUATION". 159 not to derange the relations of the dressing. When it is all removed down to the intra-cervical portion, a wad of cotton saturated with Price's glycerine, and large enough to cover completely the cervix and its first dress- ing, is laid over it, and the patient again lifted into bed. The action of this, as already fully explained, is to induce a profuse watery discharge from the vagina, which keeps the part cleanly drained of all secretions or exuda- tions from the decomposition of the blood contained in the original dressing. This glycerined cotton is to be removed and renewed daily till the suppurative process throws off the dressing from the neck of the womb. This will not be under three or four days. In the mean time the glycerine, by its detergent and antiseptic properties, keeps everything sweet and clean ; and its affinity for water, which by osmosis it extracts from the tissues with which it lies in contact, keeps the parts entirely clear of any secretion that might be re-absorbed and poison the blood, if not thus drained off by the chemico-capillary action of the dressing. No one can thus apply glycerine to the neck of the womb and not be struck with its peculiar power and properties. The intra-cervical dress- ing will be loosened on the third day or later, and it may then be gently removed with forceps. If it adheres obstinately, let it alone, but cover it and the whole cervix with the cotton glycerole, and at the next dress- ing it may come away easily. I have frequently provoked bleeding by a little impatience in removing it prema- turely. When it is once safely out, then the cervix is to be plugged with a small bit of cotton glycerole, and the whole covered as before with the same. This dressing is to be renewed daily till the parts have entirely healed, which usually takes from twelve to seventeen days, or perhaps till the recurrence of the next menstrual period 1Q0 UTERINE SURGERY. Aiid this reminds me that the operation should always be performed within from three to five days after a men- strual epoch, so that we may have time enough for the healing process to be wholly completed before the recur- rence of the next period. There is sometimes great trouble in keeping the mouth of the womb sufficiently open. It never remains just as we cut it. The tendency of all cicatrizing wounds to contract as they heal is wonderfully illustrated here. I have often been amazed to find the os contracted in a month to one-fourth of the size of the original incisions. I have frequently seen it cut open large enough to admit the index-finger up to the os internum, and then close in a few weeks to such a degree as not to admit a No. 4 or 5 bougie, and this in spite of persevering efforts to prevent the contraction. This is the case where there is great induration of the cervix, with deposits of fibrous tissue. I have frequently been compelled to repeat the opera- tion, and I remember several patients upon whom I have operated as often as three times in the course of a few months, and even then the result was not wholly satisfac- tory. These may be called exceptional cases, but it is well to know that they are not very rare. Even when the os tincse remains open enough, we may have some trouble in keeping the contracted portion above of normal dimensions. This may be the case if there is much of a flexure, particularly anteriorly. And here I would recommend the occasional passage of a bougie after the first week. Dr. Emmet is in the habit of using the sound as early as the third day after the operation, passing it into the cavity of the womb, and pressing it pretty firmly first against one side of the canal and then against the other in withdrawing it. I have in a few cases followed his example, but with a little timidity. OF MENSTRUATION. 161 Dr. Greenhalgh uses a self-retaining intra-uterine stern, which is very ingenious, and an- swers well in his hands. Dr. Priestley's instrument* (fig. 58) may be found useful under these circumstances. Introduced as an ordinary sound, it is then dilated as shown in the cut. Incision of the os often cures dysmenorrhcea ; sometimes it only modifies it. zVnd again, I have seen cases where it produced no beneficial effect whatever. The first menstrual flow after it is usually ushered in without the premoni- tions that had so long harassed the poor sufferer, and she may pass through the whole period with comparative comfort ; but I think it advisable for such patients to take very good care of themselves at each return of the flow, and to avoid all unnecessary exposure or fatigue. If there is pain enough to lie down, I direct an anodyne by the rectum, and for this purpose McMunn's elixir of opium is the very best. It is less apt to nau- seate or to produce headache than crude opium or any of its alka- loids. It is more efficacious by the rectum than by the mouth, because Fig. 58. * Medical Times and Gazette, March 5th, 1864. 11 Ig2 UTERINE SURGERY. it is more immediately in conjunction with the nenes of the affected part. But suppose the bilateral incision produces no per- manent amelioration, are we to give up the case as beyond the reach of surgery ? By no means. We must then reinvestigate ; for there may still be some mecha- nical obstacle undetected, or, if detected, unrelieved by the operation. For instance, dysmenorrhcea may persist m consequence of an undetected polypus, or of acute flexure with contraction of the canal of the cervix at the os internum ; or it may be tbe result of a curvature of the cervix, at the insertion of the vagina, with elonga- tion of the iutravaginal portion, and a consequent unequal development of its anterior and posterior seg- ments. I propose to give examples of each of these classes. I have on more than one occasion found the pain to be due to an undetected polypus, so diminutive as to elude observation. A single illustration will serve as an example of its class, and at the same time be a warning and a guide to the inexperienced. Mrs. , aged thirty-two, married at twenty-four, sterile, had dysmenorrhoea for some years before marriage, worse after. Her sufferings were excru- ciating for about two hours on the second day. She had in the course of twelve years been treated by sixty different physicians without permanent benefit, — the largest number I ever knew any one person to consult. She had been under the care of many of the most eminent men in at least five or six of the great capitals of Europe, besides her consultations at home. I saw her in January, 1857. Her general health was good ; her only trouble seemed to be the much dreaded dysmenorrhoea. OF MENSTRUATION. J 53 The uterus was of normal size and in proper position. Os and cervix both small, but not indurated. I re- sorted to the sponge tent, but found no polypus, no fibroid, and no flexure of the canal. Three days after (January 12), the os presented precisely the same appearance that it did before the use of the tents. The next menstruation was quite as painful as usual, if not more so. As the canal was straight, and the cervix soft, I would hardly have expected severe pain, although the os was rather small. Yet I did not know what else to do but to incise the os and cervix, hoping that some benefit might be derived from it. Accordingly, the operation was performed on the 22nd January, and the parts were healed before the next menstrual period ; but the pain was still the same, and so continued for three or four months, in spite of treatment. I was now quite perplexed. I had used the sponge tent and found no polypus. I had then enlarged the cervical canal without the least im- provement; but the symptoms were so evidently those of mechanical obstruction, that I concluded to make another exploration of the cavity of the uterus. I accordingly introduced a small sponge tent, and on its removal I passed another, larger and long enough to enter the cavity of the womb. On its removal, I had the satisfaction of finding and bringing away a polypus, which was but little larger than a common garden pea. Its attachment and relations, represented in the diagram (fig. 59), suggest at once the rationale of the symptoms. The violent agonizing pain always supervened on the second day of the flow. When I first felt the tumour, it was protruding through the os internum after the removal of the tent ; but by the pressure 164 UTERINE SURGERY. ~-^«~-„ Fig. 59. of the finger it suddenly slipped upwards, and I could not touch it again till the fin- ger was gently forced through the os internum to the fundus, when I fortunately seized it with forceps and brought it away. My explanation of the pain is this — By the second day coa- gula formed above the tumour, which pressed it downwards, its slender pedicle yielding till it blocked up completely the os internum just like a ball-and- socket valve. Then would come the violent neuralgic throes con- tinuing for two hours or more, till the tumour either dilated the contracted part, or was compelled to retreat again into the uterine cavity by displaced coagula driven between it and the poste- rior face of the uterus by the expulsive efforts of the organ. The case illustrates the necessity of a very thorough investigation before a correct diagnosis can always be made out in obscure c^ses. The leeching, the physicking, the blistering, the anodynes, the baths, the mountain excursions, the sea-bathing and sea voyages that this poor patient suffered and endured for years are almost incredible. As contemptible as the little polypus was, it took me nearly four months (shall I say ?) of empirical observation to find out that it was the source of all the mischief. It is now plain enough, but the difficulties of dia- gnosis may be appreciated when we remember the history of the case and the great number of dis- OF MENSTRUATION. 1Q5 tinguished physicians who were baffled in their honest efforts to elucidate it. I have already said that sometimes after the cervical canal is freely opened by the bilateral incision it con- tracts again, and the pain of dysmenorrhea may be just as severe as before the operation, and that this is more apt to be the case if there is much flexure, particularly anteriorly. We shall then in all proba- bility be compelled to repeat the operation, and exer- cise greater care in keeping the canal open afterwards. We may occasionally find the obstruction at the os internum with flexure and contraction, while the lower portion of the canal may be of normal size. This, however, is by no means common. Yet I have seen several examples of it. Its most perfect type I found in a patient of Sir Joseph Olliffe. This lady was about thirty-six years of age, and had suffered from painful menstruation most of her menstrual life. Sir Joseph had dilated the os externum and the cervix up to the os internum, but had never been able to pass a sound through this. One of the most eminent surgeons of Paris saw her in consultation with Sir Joseph about four years ago, and, failing to pass the sound, proposed to enlarge the contracted portion by the use of the actual cautery ! This treatment was not carried out,, and on my arrival in Paris, in the fall of 1862, Dr. Olliffe kindly invited me to see her. I found the fundus lying just behind the inner face of the symphysis pubis, with quite a sharp flexure at the os internum. The sound could be easily passed to the os internum, where it met with an unyielding barrier, and I was obliged to have a small one made, quite probe like, just to suit the case ; and even this could not be passed with the patient on the back ; but by placing her on the 166 UTERINE SURGERY. side, using the speculum, and fixing the cervix with a tenaculum, it passed into the uterine cavity seemingly through a dense inelastic ring of fibrous tissue, which resisted not only the ingress but the egress of the olive-shaped point of the probe. I at once agreed with Sir Joseph's opinion that an incision of the part was the only safe and speedy method of overcoming the difficulty. The neck of the uterus was split bila- terally, just as if it had been contracted all the way to the os tincse. When we came to cut the gristly circular band at a (fig. 60), the blunt- pointed knife was passed through it with some little difficulty, and the cuts on each side were attended with the peculiar creaking sensation that we experience in cutting through cartilage. The wound FlG , 60 was treated in the usual way, as previously laid down, and all was well by the time of the next menstruation. The os internum was, after the fourth or fifth day, . forcibly pressed open laterally by the sound, as practised by Dr. Emmet. But the pain of menstruation may continue even after all our best efforts to enlarge the os internum as well as the cervical canal by the bilateral incision. It is then often the consequence of curvature, with elongation of the vaginal portion of the cervix, accompanying ante- flexion. When this is the case, we shall find the os tincse looking in the direction of the axis of the vagina, the posterior portion of the cervix from the os tincse to the posterior cul-de-sac being two or three times as long OF MENSTRUATION. 167 Fig. 61. as the anterior, measuring from the os to the anterior cul-de-sac. I have repeatedly performed the bilateral operation on such cases as this without improvement, and for the best of reasons. If we take a flexible tube the size of the cervical canal, and curve it as represented by the diagram (fig. 61), it flattens out laterally, and the inner concavo-convex surfaces, necessarily brought into close apposition, present an almost val- vular mechanical obstacle to the passage of a fluid in either direc- tion. By referring to the diagram, it will be seen at once that a bila- teral incision could only widen the canal a little transversely, but not at all antero-posteriorly ; that the curvature would remain the same, and consequently the distances between the two opposing surfaces of the cervical canal would in no way be modified by such operation. Having so often failed, under such circumstances, to afford the relief anticipated from the bilateral incision, I at last devised and practised the following method. To remove the flexure of the canal would be to remove the obstacle to the easy passage of the menstrual flow. To do this, it is only necessary to split the posterior portion of the cervix from the os tincae in a straight line back- wards, nearly to the insertion of the vagina, and thus the canal of the cervix is made to run in a straight line from the cavity of the uterus to the terminus of the incision at «, instead of curving round to the os tincae. The method of doing this is very simple. The patient as usual on the left side; the speculum introduced; the anterior lip of the os tincse is held by the tenaculum, as 168 UTERINE SURGERY. so often described ; and then with a straight pair of scissors the posterior portion of the cervix is split at cne blow, as far as can be easily and conveniently done by scissors, which would be about as far as represented by the dotted line a c, fig. 61. Then the blunt-pointed knife (fig. 62), bent at a proper angle with its shaft, and cutting backwards, is passed up to the cavity of the uterus, and the part's cut in the direction of the line a d, thus straighten- ing out the canal, and thereby removing the mechanical obstacle due to its flexure. Fig 63 is intended to represent the second stage of the operation. The uterus is firmly fixed by the tenaculum, while the razor-shaped blade of the blunt knife is seen in the act of cutting the canal back- wards. The case is to be treated on the same general principles laid down for the management of the bilateral operation. There is some little care necessary to avoid cutting through the vaginal cul-de-sac into the peritoneal cavity — an unpardonable blunder that no true surgeon could possibly make. The operation has succeeded admi- rably in these cases, but is wholly inappli- cable except in just such cases as the one Fig. 62. above described. I have often performed the operation in this way, and my colleague, Dr. Emmet, has repeated it more frequently than I have ; for the relief it affords is a great tempta- tion to its performance. In operating for dysmenorrhcea, we must not lose sight of doing it in such a way as to favour the chances of conception. How often do we hear even medical OF MENSTRUATION. 169 men say, " If she could only have a child it would cure her.' 1 To this I always feel inclined to reply, u If we Fig. 63. could only cure her, she would have a child." We should remember that the physical causes that obstruct the easy egress of the catamenia, likewise obstruct the easy ingress of the spermatozoa ; and to remove the one is in some degree to relieve the other. If an inflamed, turffid cervical mucous membrane is a mechanical bar- rier to the passage from one direction, it is equally so to it from the other. If a contracted os shuts the door to an outlet, it closes it equally to an inlet. If a cervi- cal canal, flexed to such a degree as to bring its oppo- site walls into close contact, will produce the pain of dysmenorrhcea, it will as certainly prevent the pain of parturition, but only by preventing conception. Thus, to treat dysmenorrhcea successfully, is to treat many, but by no means all, cases of sterility successfully. Those who have adopted the operation of enlarging the canal of the cervix for the cure of dysmenorrhcea, seem satis- 1^0 UTERINE SURaERT. fied to rest upon it alone for the relief of sterility. But more remains to be done. It would seem that I have already said enough on the subject of dysmenorrhea, and the operations for its relief; but as my views previously published* have been controverted by some of the most eminent medical men in England, I shall say a few words more. Dr. Henry Bennetf objects to the operation of in- cising the cervix, because he thinks he can accomplish the same result by sponge tents ; and Dr. Gream,J because he thinks the bougie system, as introduced and practised by M'Intosh, answers every purpose. Dr. Gream says he has seen a case in which the neck of the womb was so largely opened that he could easily pass his finger through it, and touch the membranes of the ovum, at the third month of gestation. His patient aborted soon after ; and he thinks the abortion was not the result of passing the finger into the cavity of the uterus, but of the inability of the organ to retain its contents, in consequence of the extensive division of the circular fibres of the cervix. This is, I admit, a very rational inference ; at ail events we must accept the fact, and inquire into its cause. Mr. Spencer Wells § advocates the operation, but says he has seen several cases in which the cervix was too largely incised, and the lips of the os tincse were in consequence everted, rolled back, and almost lost in the insertion of the vagina. This is certainly a very grave objection to the operation of bilateral incision. Bat I have never seen this accident after the operation, * Lancet, March 4th and 11th, April 1st, and June 3rd, 1865. t Lancet, June 24th, 1865. \ Lancet, April 8 th, 1865. § Lancet, May 27th, 1865. OF MENSTRUATION. ^71 as performed by ray method, and, as before stated, Dr Emmet and myself have done it several hundred times Let us, then, inquire why it occasionally follows this operation in the hands of English surgeons and not in ours. At first I was disposed to believe that the gen- tlemen alluded to above had encountered unique and isolated cases ; but upon inquiry I am now convinced that this accident does occasionally follow the use of the metro-tome cache. It is well to know this fact, so as to guard against its occurrence. A short time as;o, a friend invited me to see a case of fibroid of the uterus, attended by severe haemorrhages, in which he had divided the cervix after the plan of Mr. Baker Brown. The operation had been done by some one before, but the bleedings continued, and my friend, desirous of giving the operation a fair chance, determined to make a more thorough division of the cervix, for which purpose he set the blades of the metro- tome cache very widely, so as to cut deeply. The con- sequence was a complete division of the cervix through the whole of the circular fibres, from the os tincae quite to the cavity of the uterus, which produced the defor- mity that Mr. Spencer Wells speaks of. After seeing this case, I could no longer doubt. Why does this accident happen after the metro-tome cache method of operating, and not after my plan ? The reason is obvious enough, if we consider the difference in the two methods of operating. To illustrate this, let the diagram (fig. 64) represent the natural size of the uterus. This outline is taken from Dr. Savage's* picture of a dissection of a uterus of natural size. I have made * " Illustrations of the Surgery of the Female Pelvic Organs." By Henry Savage, M.D., Physician to the Samaritan Hospital for Women. Plate 8, fig. 3. 172 UTERINE SURGERY. the cervix project a little more into the vagina, as we Fig. 64. usually find it so in the majority of cases requiring operation. According to my plan of operating, the dotted line a b would represent the proportion of cervical tissue divided by the scissors (page 156), while the dotted lines a c,b c would represent the extent of the incisions made by the blunt-pointed knife (fig. 55, page 157) up towards the cavity of the uterus. Now, upon this same diagram, let us see what would be the nature and extent of the incisions made by the metrotome cache. We will take Dr. Greeuhalsfh's instrument, as now made in London by Weiss, and in Paris by Charriere, as being the safest and best of its class. Lay it down upon this diagram, with the point at the fundus d, and the shoul- OF MENSTRUATION. 17c der at the os tiucae, hold it firmly as we would in ope- rating upon a patient, then draw the blades slowly down, and the extent of their movements will be shown by the dotted lines e d,fd. The two* methods differ theoretically as well as prac- tically. The one is based upon the idea that the obstacle to be overcome usually exists in the lower portion of the cervical canal ; the other upon the belief that it is always found at the os internum. Now, by comparing the in- cisions made by these two methods, it will be seen that the metro-tome cache divides the circular fibres of the cervix to a greater extent at the os internum, and through- out the entire cervix, than is done by my method. As before said, too large a division of the cervix is sometimes followed by eversiou and rolling back of the two lips of the os tinose. But why only sometimes ? Large and small are always relative terms. What may be small in one case may be comparatively large in another. The metro-tome cache cuts so much whether the cervix be large or small. We know very well that the size of the cervix varies greatly in the unimpregnated uterus, and that in the class of cases requiring this operation, it is sometimes less than an inch in diameter. Now, if we use an instrument that cuts more than this, it must of necessity cut through the cervix from side to side ; and hence the danger of the accidents that are said to some- times follow this operation. I have seen, in several shops, metro-tomes that could be opened from one and a half to two inches. I am not going out of the way to caution my younger brethren against machines of this sort, when I call to mind the fact that a friend of mine recently used one of them, and was afterwards glad to see his patient ultimately recover from the serious consequences of his rashness. If we 174 UTERINE SURGERY. must use a metro-tome cache, let us take Dr. Green* halgh's, with its maximum expansion, as shown in the diagram above. But why do the lips of the os tincse roll back when the cervix is too extensively incised ? The rationale is this : The longitudinal fibres of the uterus run down from the fundus to be inserted or incorporated antero- posterior^ with the circular fibres of the cervix. These two sets of muscular fibres are antagonistic in their action physiologically. In a normal labour, the contraction of the longitudinal fibres of the body must be accompanied or followed by a relaxation of the circular fibres of the cervix, or the labour could not be finished. They are as antagonistic as are the flexors and extensors of the hand. Destroy the power of the one set of muscles, and the other will inevitably take on a tonic contraction, and draw the hand in the direction of the line of their action. In the operation of dividing the circular fibres of the cervix uteri by the metro-tome cache, if the whole dia- meter of the cervix be cut entirely through, we must of necessity cut the whole of its circular muscular fibres, which destroys their contractility, and removes the force that bound, as it were, in a bundle the terminal extre- mities of the longitudinal fibres, which then take on a tonic rigidity, retracting the divided lips of the os tincae, and producing the deformity that, we must admit, is occasionally seen to follow the metro-tome cache method of operating. Whether my explanation be correct or not, does not in the least affect the fact under consideration ; and the young surgeon cannot be too careful, for if he should unfortunately cut too much, there is no remedy for his mistake. It is far better to cut too little, even at the risk of being compelled to repeat the operation. SECTION III. THE OS AND CERVIX UTERI SHOULD BE SUFFI- CIENTLY OPEN, NOT ONLY TO PERMIT THE FREE EXIT OF THE MENSTRUAL FLOW, BUT ALSO TO ADMIT THE INGRESS OF THE SPERMA- TOZOA. ' SECTION III. THE OS AND CERVIX UTERI SHOULD BE SUFFICIENTLY OPEN, NOT ONLY TO PERMIT THE FREE EXIT OF THE MEN- STRUAL FLOW, BUT ALSO TO ADMIT THE INGRESS OF THE SPER ^ATOZOA. In the preceding pages we have followed symptomatology to the detection and treatment of organic disease, but now we propose to ask in what particular organic struc- ture varies from a normal condition, irrespective of rational signs ? It will then be necessary to inquire into the normal conditions and relations of the uterus, before speaking of its anomalies, and their influence on concep- tion. Anatomists tell us that the uterus is pear-shaped, and flattened a little antero-posteriorly ; that it is from two and a half to three inches long ; an inch and a half wide, more or less, at its largest part ; and about an inch thick ; that it is divided into fundus, body, and cervix ; that its cavity is from two and a quarter to two and a half inches lon^, the canal of the cervix beinsj a little longer than that of the body ; that the os tincse is generally round in the nulliparous uterus ; elliptical and transverse after child-bearing ; and that the cervix is rounded and embraced by the vagina, which is inserted higher behind than before, thus making the posterior intravaginal portion of the cervix a little longer than the anterior. But anatomists do not tell us how far the intravaginal portion of the cervix should project into the 178 UTERINE SURGERY. vagina, or what proportion it should bear to the supra- vaginal section, which, by the bye, is an important matter to determine. Not having time or inclination to go to the dead-house for the verification of this point, I shall describe the neck of the womb as I see it in daily investigations on the living. I assume that a normal os tincse, whether round or transverse and elliptical, should be open, and filled with a slippery translucent mucus of slightly alkaline reaction ; that the cervix should be rounded, truncated, and elastic to the touch ; that the intravaginal portion should be about a fifth or not more than a fourth of its whole length, i.e., from a quarter to a third of an inch anteriorly, and a fraction more poste- riorly ; that the canal of the cervix should be straight or curved slightly forward ; and that the axis of the whole organ should stand at about right angles with that of the vagina, being neither anteverted nor retro- verted to any great degree. Any woman with such a state of the uterus will always conceive in three or four months after marriage, if everything else is ri^ht. Having laid down this ideal of what the womb should be, an ideal that has not been imagined, but drawn from actual observation in the clinique and the consulting-room, we shall proceed to the examination of the sterile, unimpregnated uterus, to see where and how it may differ from a normal conceptive state. This neces- sarily embraces anomalies or deviations from a normal state ; 1st, of the mouth of the womb ; 2nd, of the cervix ; and 3rd, of the body : and this brings us at once to the third general subdivision of our subject, viz., that the os and cervix uteri should be sufficiently open not only to permit the free discharge of the menstrual flow, but also to admit the iugress of the spermatozoa. It might appear, at the first glance, that this propo- OS TINC^E- ABNORMAL. 1^9 siticn liad been embraced, and sufficiently discussed, in the preceding article on painful menstruation. But experience teaches us differently ; for instance, how often do we see sterility where there is no symptom of disease so far as physical suffering is concerned ? Menstruation may be perfectly normal, there may be no back-ache, no vesical tenesmus, no bearing-down, no leucorrhcea, indeed, no sign of diseased action ; and when we come to a physical exploration, we may even find the uterus of proper size, in a normal position, and with a straight cervical canal, but the os may not be larger than a pin's head, and if to this be added induration of the cervix, the case is almost necessarily sterile ; for while the os and cervix are capacious enough to transmit the outward flow, the os itself is not capable of admitting the sperm, and without this there can, of course, be no conception. This is not theoretical, and I might give numerous illus- trations in proof, but one will suffice. Mrs. X., of fine form and vigorous health, had been married many years (thirteen or fourteen) without offspring. Menstruation regular, normal; never had leucorrhcea, or any other symptom of uterine disease ; and people wondered why such a fine specimen of womankind should not become a mother; and they very generally and erroneously inferred that it could not be the fault of such a physical organization. She consulted many eminent medical men, and took baths and mineral waters, and cordials, elixirs, and nostrums without number. She had submitted to be bougied till an attack of pelvic cellulitis supervening had well-nigh cost her her life. Indeed, I never saw any woman so determined on having offspring, and for that purpose she was read}^ to suffer anything and to take any reason- able risk. On examination, I found the uterus in proper 180 UTERINE SURGERY. position, and rather under size ; but as menstruation was perfectly normal, the size of the organ was not deemed of any great importance. The canal was straight, but the os was exceedingly small, and the cervix felt to the touch like a little round marble, and almost as hard. Of course there was but one thing to be done, viz., to open the os and cervix by the bilateral operation. This lady, who had already suffered so much from dilata- tion, thought the operation a small affair compared to the result hoped for. In this case, I was able to say beforehand that she would almost certainly conceive after the operation. Very often we can say to one, "Yes, you are almost sure to conceive ;" while to another we are compelled to say, " Conception is probable ;" to another, " It is possible ;" and to others, "It is impos- sible." This diagram (fig. 65) re- presents the relative condition of the os and cervix. The ope- ration was done in April, and conception occurred in Decem- ber following. Here there was no dysmenorrhea, as already remarked. And why ? Simply because there was no mechanical obstruction to the flow. The canal of the cervix was small, but straight ; and its mucous membrane was not congested. Had it been a little crooked, there would probably have been pain, for it was very small. But as small as the os was, it per- mitted the easy exit of the menstrual flow, while it prevented the ingress of the sperm. This is proved by Pig. 65. OS TINCLE— ABNORMAL. 181 the fact that she was sterile for thirteen or fourteen years, during which time she tried all sorts of remedies to overcome it, and then became pregnant in a few months after the performance of the operation. I have seen many other similar cases, and a great many like it artificially produced by the injudicious use of potassa fusa, potassa c. calce, and even nitrate of silver. Sometimes the os tincse becomes wholly occluded by the prolonged use of these agents ; more frequently it is partially closed, and the cervix always feels indurated. Whether the induration is due to the action of the reme- dy, or to the inflammation that called for its applica- tion, I shall not pretend to say ; but I have generally found artificial occlusion of the os to co-exist with indu- ration of the cervix. This produces a state of acquired sterility. I have met with it more frequently amongst those who had once borne children, though I have seen it in those who had not. A marked example of this was found in the out-door practice of the Woman's Hos- pital, in a young unmarried woman who had had potassa c. calce applied some months before at one of our dis- pensaries. When the finger was introduced into the vagina, the cervix was found in proper position, but it was perfectly round and hard, and no os was to be felt. When the speculum was used, we found the os com- pletely bridged over by a dense fibrous band of union, with a little opening at each extremity, which would not admit an ordinary-sized probe. Fig. 66 represents the appearance of the os in Fig. 66. ^32 UTERINE SURGERY. this case, and shows the two little points a a, whence issued the menstrual flow. I saw, in consultation with Sir Joseph Olliffe in Paris, in 186 3, a lady in the higher ranks of life, who had been twice married without offspring, and whose os tincse had been thus artificially agglutinated by the pro- longed use of the nitrate of silver during her first marriage. When this mechanical obstruction to the esrress of the menses is thus artificially produced, we may find more or less suffering and general malaise attending the flow, which becomes unusually prolonged, always very dark-coloured, often of tarry consistence, and sometimes offensive. The cessation of the flow is then followed by a dark-brownish fine coffee-grounds-like mucus, which continues for a few days, and frequently irritates the parts with which it comes in contact. The mechanical obstruction at the os preventing the easy outlet of the flow, causes a partial retention of the secretions, which thereby undergo some change, that reacts upon the tis- sues, and produces a sort of subacute endo-metritis. Of course the only remedy is the restoration of the os and cervix to a normal state, by cutting the canal open, and keeping it so. This species of artificial occlusion of the os by caustic applications is not, I am glad to say, very common, but I fear it occurs more frequently than it should. Fortu^ nately its effects are easily remedied if they are recog- nized. The cases of it that have fallen under my observation did not present themselves on account of the sterility that it engendered, but because of the ordinary symp- toms of uterine disease from which they suffered. Several of these, when cured of the organic difficulty, were rendered fruitful again. OS TINCLE— ABNORMAL. ^33 1 have repeatedly said that the subjects of sterility are naturally arrauged in two great classes ; viz., those who have never borne children, and those who, having once conceived, cease, from some cause or other, to con« ceive again. Very perfect illustrations of this last class may be found in those who have had the os uteri artificially sealed up by the injudicious use of the potassa fusa or potassa c. calce. Amongst the cases of this sort that I have seen, I now call to mind two ladies, who had been treated by the same physician. They are important enough in their bearings on this subdivision of our subject, to give a few particulars. A lady, aged thirty years, married at twenty-one, had two children, the youngest six years old. There was nothing peculiar about the labours, but she was subject to leucorrhoea after the last one, for which she had gene- ral constitutional treatment, and, after a while, local applications of the potassa c. calce, nit. arg., &c. Menses rather profuse but otherwise normal, till about two years ago, they became gradually veiy tedious and pro- longed, lasting nine or ten days, instead of three or four, as they did previously to the potassa c. calce treatment. The flow was now scanty, very dark-coloured, almost black, attended with nausea, nervous irritability, and a sense of utter prostration, together with bearing-down, weight and soreness in the rectum, and neuralgic pains at the end of the coccyx. She also had great tender- ness and sensitiveness at the mouth of the vagina. The fundus was considerably hypertrophied, the cervix was also hypertrophied and indurated, and felt more like a small globe pessary than anything else ; and it was utterly impossible to detect the os tinese by the touch. 184 UTERINE SURGERY Fie. 67 shows about the size and relation of the little opening through which the menses made their tedious escape. The canal was opened by the bilateral incision. The whole cervix was of fibrous hardness, and the resist- ance to the knife was very great. As usual in these cases, there was but little haemorrhage, but there was great trouble in keeping the os open. However, it remained sufficiently so. The next menstruation was normal, and in four months she conceived again, after an acquired sterility of six years, due, firstly, to granular Fig. 67. engorgement, and its attendant leucorrhcea, and lastly, to the potassa c. calce treatment and its result, occlusion of the os. I do not object to the use of potassa c. calce judi- ciously applied, but it is well for us to know that it is ail-powerful to do mischief, while we intend only to do good with it. I feel, therefore, justified in pressing this matter a little more on the attention of the reader. Mrs. M., aged thirty-six, three children, youngest six years; some uterine trouble ever since the last labour; was treated for "ulceration" by potassa c. calce three years before I saw her in April, 1856. Her menses, OS UNCLE— ABNORMAL. 1g5 scanty, dark-coloured, of a tarry appearance, were now preceded by pain for a week. It is a waste of time to give general or even local symptoms. The uterus was anteverted,tlie fundus hypertrophied, the cervix almost as hard as cartilage, and the os was contracted to a little round point, that could not be detected by the touch. The os was cut open ; the next menstruation was painless and normal, and the enlargement of the fundus soon subsided as a consequence of the easy exit of the menses, and conception occurred a few months after- wards. - But I pass from this class of cases to another, where the os is open enough to permit the easy exit of the flow, but where there may still be a mechanical obstruc- tion to the ingress of the spermatozoa. It is not suffi- cient to say that the mouth of the womb is large enough, and that it admits easily the passage of a bougie or a sound. To illustrate my meaning I turn to my note-book. Mrs. — — , aged thirty-five, two children, youngest ten years old. She had been in bad health for a long time, and was treated by a very eminent physician, Dr. Duane, of Schenectady, who sent her to me in June, 1856. The uterus was anteverted, and greatly hypertrophied, being three inches and three quarters to the fundus ; the cervix was the seat of fibrous engorgement ; the menses were profuse, lasting five or six days, returning in seven- teen ; and she was anemic and prostrated. A course of treatment, local and constitutional, was agreed upon, and Dr. Duane sent his patient to me again in the autumn. She was somewhat improved ; the depth of the uterus was three and a quarter inches 186 UTERINE SURGERY. instead of three and three quarters ; and the hyper- trophy and induration of the cervix were better, but there was little or no improvement otherwise. I was at a loss what more to do for her relief, and felt very sure that her ten years of sterility was due not so much to the state of her general health as to the peculiar conformation of the mouth of the womb, which certainly prevented the ingress of the sper- matozoa. Many of us think that a pregnancy will often modify the nutritive functions of the uterus in such a way as to remove engorgements, hypertrophic condi- tions, and even small fibroids. With my mind full of this idea, I asked my patient, rather jocularly, if she would like to have more offspring. She promptly re- plied, "No." "Well," said I, "it's difficult for me to determine what else to do, if you will not consent for me to rectify the condition of the mouth of the womb, so that conception may take place." She did not think it possible, and hardly believed me to be in earnest. Now it may be asked what could be the trouble with the mouth of the womb, when she had had children, and when she still menstruated without the least difficulty. From the birth of the last child she had had leucorrhoea, as a consequence of granular engorgement of the cervix. Dr. Duane had cured this long ago, and there still remained, as previously stated, some hypertrophy of the cervix. This, too, he had removed, in a great mea- sure, during the summer, by two small potassa c Fig. 68. OS TINC^E— ABNORMAL. 187 calce issues, one on each lip of the os tincse. But there still remained the same mechanical obstruction at the os as before, which is represented by fig. 68. A cres- centic-shaped os is by no means uncommon. We often see -it in ante versions, and I have frequently seen it where the position of the uterus was nor- mal. We may have it where there has never been conception, or it may occur after child-bearing, as a consequence of chronic inflammation of the cervix, with hypertrophy of the cervical mucous membrane. Here it presented no barrier whatever to an outward flow; but a glance at the peculiar projection a from the anterior- lip, shows what a perfectly valvular closure it opposed to any inward flow. When this little tubercle a was hooked with a small tenaculum and pulled down- wards, so as to open the canal of the cervix, and permit a view of its cavity, this hypertrophic condition was seen to extend up along the anterior face of the cervix for an inch. The curvilinear dotted line c shows the course of the incision bv which this was removed. It was a triangular wedge, as seen in fig. 69, the apex having reached nearly to the os in- ternum. There was but little bleeding, and this was controlled at once by the pressure of a sponge probang, and then by the applica- tion of a pledget of cotton, wet with a solu- tion of the percbloride of iron. Fig. go. The wound was healed by the time of the next menstruation; and my patient went home with the os presenting a perfectly normal appearance. Not- withstanding her feeble state of health, and the length of time since the birth of her last child, conception occurred a month after the operation. She went the full time, and was safely delivered by Dr. Duane of a fine 188 UTERINE SURGERY. boy. But I am constrained to say that the pregnancy produced no good effect either constitutionally or locally. I had occasion to examine the uterus some four or five months after delivery, and its condition was about the same as at the time of conception. The case is valuable only as illustrating one of the mechanical obstacles to conception. It is not exceptional, for I have seen other similar cases. Again, the mouth of the womb may be open enough to let the menses flow out freely, and it may be even large enough to admit easily a No. 8 or 10 bougie, and yet be absolutely closed to the ingress of the sperma- tozoa ; and that without any excrescence or malforma- tion. This condition is a very common cause of acquired sterility, and occurs in this way : Labour is followed by a chronic inflammation of the cervix, which becomes hypertrophied ; the inflammation or granular erosion is cured, but the hypertrophic condition conjoined with induration remains, and the two indurated, thickened lips of the os tincse lie in close apposition, yielding readily to any fluid passing down, but opposing any passing up the canal. We too often overlook this cause of sterility, common as it is. We are apt to say the mouth of the womb is all right, because it admits a large bougie, and gives free vent from the uterine cavity. Now, what is to be done with such a case ? The os is a straight transverse line, with the two opposite bor- ders crowded obstinately against each other (fig. 70). It is long enough from side to side, but antero-posteri- Fig. TO. OS TINGS— ABNORMAL. 189 orly it has lost its gaping, graceful oval form, and although quite as large as it ought to be, it is still to all intents and purposes practically closed. Such an os as this may be bougied till both surgeon and patient are mutually tired out, without any result whatever ; and there is but one thing to do, viz., to incise the cervix as for dysmenorrhoea. It may seem paradoxical to enlarge an os that is already large enough, but the only way in which I have ever succeeded in causing a permanent receding of such compressed lips, is by a bilateral divi- sion of the circular fibres of the indurated cervix. In March, 1859, a lady, twenty-seven years old, con- sulted me on account of acquired sterility. She had had one child five years before, — no conception since. As she and her husband were both in vigorous health, she wished to know the cause of what was to them a source of great unhappiness. She had been told by her family physician that there was no reason why she should not conceive. On the contrary, I said that conception was utterly impossible, with the mouth of the womb as it was, and explained the necessity of a surgical operation. Being satisfied of its painlessness and its safety, she sub- mitted to it at once. The cervix was hard and gristly, but the incisions produced the desired result of giving the os an elliptical shape. It required nice care to prevent a contraction of the os to its former condition. Fortunately all went on well, and in less than twelve months from the elate of the operation the mother was safely delivered of twins, which, she said, made up amply for her lost time. In fifteen months after this she gave birth to another child, which proved that the mouth of the womb re- mained properly open. I might go on to enumerate various other changes 190 UTERINE SURGERY. that take place in the appearance and form of the os> as a result of accident, inflammation, engorgement, or hypertrophy, any and all of which may in some sort in- terfere with the passage of the spermatozoa to the cavity of the uterus. Mauy of these we will recognize and remedy, while great numbers, even when fully under- stood, will baffle our efforts. We all know that a protracted labour with impacted head often produces sloughings of the vagina, which result in fistulous openings into the bladder or rectum ; but sometimes we have the impaction in the superior strait before the head has passed through the cervix, and then we may have a sloughing of some part of the cervix without necessarily a fistulous communication with the bladder or rectum. Sometimes we see the anterior lip destroyed ; again the lateral portion of the cervix ; again the posterior lip ; and a few years ago, Professor Isaac E. Taylor, of the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, showed me the entire cervix that had been thrown off by slough, in consequence of impaction. In almost all the cases, the cicatrizing process produces malforma- tions of the os that mechanically prevent conception. I might give an immense number of illustrations of these unfortunate cases, drawn from the records of the Wo- man's Hospital, but one will suffice. Fig. 71 represents the appearance of a case that was in the Woman's Hospital in 1856 ; the anterior lip of the os tincse was entirely destroyed, but the posterior being intact, projected slightly forwards, so as to hide the small opening leading to the canal of the cervix. There was a minute vesico- vaginal fistula which was easily cured, but the mouth of the womb remained contracted, puckered, and over-lapped by the posterior lip in such a OS TINOffi— ABNORMAL. 191 way as to form a complete barrier to a subsequent conception. Professor Fordyce Barker, of the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, sent me a case in 1858, in which the whole cervix had sloughed off without injury to the Fig. 71. vagina ; and the cicatrizing process had here produced a complete obliteration of the os. When the finger was passed into the vagina, we could feel the womb as if it were sitting on this canal, seemingly attached to it by a narrow neck, but not projecting into it at all. Here, not only the os but the canal of the cervix was oblite- rated. It was no easy matter to make an opening through this dense isthmus of fibrous tissue up to the cavity of the organ. But I fortunately succeeded, and kept the canal open with an intra-uterine stem for two months, and the patient left the Hospital ; but she returned ia two or three months afterwards, just as she- was when I first saw her. The operation was repeated a second and even a third time, and the canal was eventually obliterated a second and a third time. But other deformities of the os tineas may occur of a less formidable character, still resulting in complete sterility. A.s so often said, any organic condition 192 UTERINE SURGERY. whatever that tends to prevent the passage of the spermatozoa, necessarily prevents conception. Wishing to impress this point on the young surgeon, I shall continue clinical illustrations of my meaning. A lady, aged twenty-six years, had had two labours at full term, the last six years ago. This labour was violent and very rapid, lasting only half an hour. The child was large, and the head was probably forced through the neck of the womb before it was sufficiently dilated, and the os was, consequently, lacerated from side to side. This healed slowly, but she remained sterile afterwards. Fig. 72 represents the appearance of the os : the anterior half of the cervix was twice as thick as the posterior, while the posterior lip of the os over-lapped the anterior, closing it valvularly and perfectly. The cervix was indurated, and the cicatrices resulting from the laceration and subsequent healing could be distinctly seen extending laterally from the os to the insertion of the vagina. This lady was anxious for more offspring ; and I proposed to cut off the poste- rior over-lapping lip of the os, as indicated by the dotted line «, which would straighten the canal and open the door to the entrance of the spermatozoa, that is, if the healing process could be managed so as to prevent undue contraction. However, she was frightened at the idea of an operation, and would have nothing done. But it may be said. " Your views of conception are Pig. 72. OS TINC^E— ABNORMAL. 193 entirely too mechanical." The act of copulation is purely mechanical. It is only necessary to get the semen into the proper place at the proper time. It makes no difference whether the copulative act be performed with great vigour and intense erethism, or whether it be done feebly, quickly, and unsatisfactorily ; provided the semen be deposited at the mouth of the womb, everything else being as we would have it. Thus far I accept the charge of mechanical views. To illustrate the principles of the operation above suggested, here is a case in point. A widower in the prime of life, in good health, the father of children, married a young wife, who at the end of five years remained sterile. The fault was not with the husband, as shown by his previous marriage. The wife's men- struation was regular, lasted two days, and not painful to any great degree, except when she was exposed to cold during the advent of the flow. She suffered slightly from con- stipation and haemorrhoids, but her great trouble was leucorrhcea, with pruritus. An examination showed that there was no granular ero- sion of the os, and that the irritating secretion was a pure utorrhoea. Fig. 73 represents the an- atomical peculiarities of the os and cervix and the course of the canal. The position of the uterus was normal. The intra-vaginal portion of the cervix was irregularly developed, the anterior 13 Fig. 73. 194 UTERINE SURGERY. segment being not more than one-fourth as long as the posterior. In other words, the os tincse was fouLcl, as it were, on the anterior face of the cervix instead of being central, as at , then its mere incision will not so easily restore it to anything like a normal condition. We sometimes find the cervix as conical as a mole's head, gradually tapering from the insertion of the vagina almost to a point at the os tincae, being very much longer than it is broad. Calling to mind the fact that in 218 cases it was straight, conical, and elongated in 116, or more than half, I now think that the great mistake I have made in the treatment of these cases, was that of simply incising the os and cervix ; and the same mistake has been made by all other surgeons. I now propose to amputate a portion of the cervix in all such cases, for the purpose of giving it as near a normal form as possible. For instance, in fig. 82, let the cervix be amputated at the point designated by the dotted line. We have all been afraid to trun- cate the cervix in this way (if any of us ever thought of it before), and were satisfied with simply splitting it up for the relief of the pain of menstruation, thinking that if we were successful in this we might hope for success in other things. I have cut open the neck of the womb, and often seen conception follow soon after; and I have cut open scores, nay, hundreds of others, sometimes with relief to suffering ; but how often have I been disappointed in the great object of the operation! And why? I now see that, in many cases, more must be done than to open the canal of the cervix. When I run my eye over the list of cases in which Fig. 82. 216 UTERINE SURGERY. the operation has been quickly followed by conception, I discover that while almost all had a contracted os, all had also a cervix of no unusual length ; and when 1 examine closely all those who have had a division of the os and cervix without its being followed by con- ception, I find almost every one of them either with an elongated conical cervix, or with some other com- plication equally if not more unfavourable. Does not the inference follow from this, that if we expect to treat such cases with more certainty and greater success, we must, other things being equal, approximate a nor- mal condition as much as possible, by truncating the cervix to a proper size and form ? It was but the other day I had the opportunity of examining the cervix of an unmarried lady upon whom I had performed amputation two years ago ; and so perfectly normal was the appearance of the os and cervix, that there wera no evidences whatever of the fact that an operation had ever been done. Before closing this subject, I may give a few more illustrations of the conical cervix. For instance, it may be found with a flexure, the anterior and posterior portions being unequally developed, as in fig. 83; and here we may cut open the cervix bilaterally, or split the posterior lip directly backwards; but 1 think it would be much better to amputate in the direction of the dotted line, and afterwards to cut open the cervix bilaterally, if the prime object of all treatment be offspring. Again, we may have the conical cervix with a straight canal ; the whole organ having the feel of a hard inverted cone (fig. 84). These cases I have always cut open bilaterally, but I can call to mind few that were followed by conception. CERVIX UTERI— ABNORMAL. 217 In all such cases I am now very sure that it would be better to amputate, and restore the cervix at once to a normal condition. Pig. 83. Fig. 84. It is not at all uncommon to find a concoid cervix accompanied with retroversion. Sometimes the mal- position seems to be the result of the elongated conoid cervix pressing against the posterior wall of the vagina. Conception is impossible in a womb of this relative size, form, and position (fig. 85). Fig. 85. These examples of conoidity are enough to impress upon our minds its general character and appearance ; but there are cases that cannot be called conoid, and yet are to be treated in the same way if we expect offspring. For example, I saw, in consultation in Paris, in May, 1863, a lady, about 27 years old, who had been 218 UTERINE SURGERY. married six or seven years without offspring. She had had dysmenorrhoea ever since her marriage, and had been treated by very distinguished physicians, one of whom told her that she might possibly fall into the hands of some surgeon who might wish to cut open the neck of the womb, against which he would most seriously protest, as an operation fraught with danger. It is useless for me to dwell upon her menstrual suffer- ings, and general nervous, irritable condition. There was auteversion, with hypertrophic enlargement of the fundus antero-posteriorly, as at or, b (fig. 86). Fig. 86. The cervix was curved, as shown in the diagram. The posterior lip overlapped the anterior, giving the os a crescentic shape. The anterior lip was granular. The cervix was not, properly speaking, conoid ; but it was elongated, too long for easy conception, even if it had been straight and patulous. The canal of the cervix could not be called contracted, and yet the flexure was such as to bring the antero-posterior surfaces in close apposi- tion, like laying the bowl of one spoon in another, which always presents a very complete obstruction to the egress of the menstrual flow. As a consequence of this mechanical barrier, she had a persistent endometritis, as CERVIX UTERI— ABNORMAL. 219 seen by the dark brownish mucus that was always found hanging from the cervical canal. I here proposed to divide the cervix bilaterally, at the same time saying that amputation would give us a better chance for permanent relief. Her medical attendant agreed to the operation of incising the os and cervix. Our object was to relieve the dysnienorrhcea and endometritis by opening the canal, knowing full well that it would be a most difficult thing to render it permanent unless we could keep the posterior lip everted or rolled backwards. However, the operation was thus performed, much against the wishes of the patient herself, who begged for amputa- tion, as affording her the surest, if not the safest, method of cure. Her first menstruation after the operation was entirely painless, but unfortunately it did not remain so, and further treatment was necessary. In cases like this I am sure it would be better to amputate the cervix first, and then incise it at some subsequent period. If experience should prove that I am correct in my views in regard to the necessity of amputating an elongated conoid cervix, for the purpose of augmenting the chances of conception, 1 feel that it is important to simplify the operation as much as possible. The ampu- tation of the cervix by scissors, as I have always done it, is easy enough in the hands of a practised surgeon, but every one will not find it always so easy to make a good even stump by this method. I have not been able to get a pair of scissors curved sufficiently to do the work neatly. But I think I have at last hit upon something better, which I would term the uterine guillotine. This instrument is made in London by Mayer, and in Paris by Charriere. The idea of the uterine guillotine occurred to me in this way. In July last (18G5) my 220 UTERINE SURGERY. friend Dr. Henry Bennet invited me to amputate a a elongated hypertrophied cervix in a patient of his who had had procidentia for a long time. The cervix pro- jected from the vulva about an inch and a half. It was necessary to remove three-fourths of an inch of it. Dr. Fig. 87. Bennet held the uterus firmly with a double tenaculum forceps (fig. 87), seizing the cervix autero-posteriorly, just above the point of election for the amputation. I then caught hold of the end of the cervix, and with a bistourie cut it instantly off. The stump was covered over with mucous membrane in the usual way with silver sutures. The operation was done so quickly and withal so neatly, that I immediately said, "Why should we not have an instrument, like those for the tonsils, to amputate the cervix all at once, while the organ is in situ?" This idea I gave to Mr. Mayer, and fig. 88 represents the instrument. It consists simply in adding a blade to the ecraseur. At first I had a wire to con- strict the part to be amputated, but I found that it would bend a little from a right line when tightened, and so strike the edge of the knife as it was pushed forwards; then, at M. Charriere's suggestion, a loop of narrow watch spring doubled three or four times was substituted, giving a flat surface along which the blade glides without obstruction. CERVIX UTERI— ABNORMAL. 221 J\ In applying the instrument, let the loop f encircle the cervix where we wish to cut it off ; ^ turn the screw-nut b till the loop em- braces the part firmly and immovably ; transfix the' cervix with the needle by means of the slide d ; then push the blade e quickly forwards by forcing down the shaft #, and the part will be instantly cut through. The dotted lines I, i, j show the relations of the loop, needle, and knife, when the opera- tion is finished. The patient is to be, of course, in the left lateral semi-prone position, and the operation executed without traction on the uterus. The stump is to be covered over with mucous membrane, as previously de- scribed and figured (p. 207). There is always some contraction of the os ex- ternum after all amputations of the cervix. It is better as a rule to let things take their course, and in two or three months afterwards cut open the os and cervix, and treat it just as we would under ordinary circumstances requiring such an operation. If we attempt to keep the os normally open, there is danger of interfering with the covering of the stump ; and if we re- sort to the operation of incising it too soon after the amputation, say just after the next menstrual flow, we may in our manipulations tear the vaginal covering of the stump from the surface to which it has Fig. 88. 222 UTERINE SURGERY. recently adhered. I "have had this accident happen in my own hands; and hence the warning to guard against it. Induration of the cervix is so often an attendant of the sterile condition that it is appropriate to speak of it here in connection with the size and form of the cervix. It may be natural or acquired ; natural when we find a little gristly-feeling cervix in a dysmenorrhceal case, where there is often a small fibroid in the anterior wall of the uterus ; acquired, when we find it following a chronic inflammation of the cervix, in which the granular condition disappears after a very long time and perhaps a long treatment. I have no specific treatment to suggest, and I look upon it as important, more particularly as it may influence the size, form, and relations of the os and cervix. If there is a deposit of fibrous tissue in the cervix, as a result of inflammatory action, I know of no short way of causing its absorption, and I deal with it only incidentally, as my attention is directed to the rec- tification of the anatomical and mechanical peculiarities already discussed. I know that physicians give altera- tives, absorbents, and general constitutional remedies, and apply all sorts of things locally ; that they melt down the cervix with potassa cum calce ; but even then the induration remains; and I would prefer immediate amputation to this tedious uncertain process. It is sup- posed that the drain of the caustic issue softens the parts ; but I have not seen it so, and some years ago I often used this potent agent. I must say, however, that Professor Fleetwood Churchill's iodine treatment has in my hands produced a greater amelioration in these cases than anything else; but it is tedious. Dr. Churchill tells me that I have failed with it because I have not persevered long enough in its use. I beg leave here to CERVIX UTERI— ABNORMAL. 223 refer the reader to his learned and classic work on the Diseases of Women for minute information oa thia point. Dr. Barnes has recently (June 7th, 1865) presented a paper to the London Obstetrical Society, in which he discusses very ably the influence exercised by the conoid cervix upon the sterile condition. The following sum- mary* is extracted from the report of the Secretary, Dr. Meadows : — " Dr. Barnes described and figured the form of cervix uteri which projected into the vagina as a conical body, the vagina appearing to be reflected off at a point nearer the os internum than normal. The os externum was unusually minute, scarcely admitting the uterine sound. This (the os externum) was the real seat of constriction. The os internum was normally a narrow opening, and in these cases of dysmenorrhcea and sterility it was commonly found to be uf normal character. It was therefore unnecessary to divide it. It was, moreover, dangerous to divide it, on account of the close proximity of the large vessels and plexuses run- ning into the uterus on a level with it Discussing the question of treatment, Dr. Barnes showed that dila- tation was unsatisfactory ; that incision of the os inter- num as practised by Dr. Simpson's single bistourie cache, and by Dr. Greenhalgh's double bistourie cache, was unsafe and superfluous. He objected to the latter instru- ment, especially that it must cut as it was set, that it was too much of an automatic machine, not leaving scope for the judgment of the operator. His (Dr. Barnes's) own instrument, constructed like a pair of * Lancet, July 15th, 1865 : " On the Dysmenorrhcea, Metrorrhagia, Ovari- tis, and Sterility associated with a Peculiar Form of the Cervix Uteri, and the Treatment by Division," By Robert Barnes, M.D. 224 UTERINE SURGERY. scissors, acted on the same principle as Dr. Sims's ; it divided only the os externum, so as to open the cavity of the cervix, the part to be cut being first seized between the two blades. The operation was perfectly free from risk ; the haemorrhage was usually slight, and a good os was made. He had performed the operation many times, both in hospital and private practice, and was well satisfied with the results. One advantage of incision over dilatation was, that it relieved the engorge- ment and inflammation." Dr. Barnes's admirable paper gave rise to a length- ened discussion ; he and Mr. Baker Brown alone, amongst all the speakers, holding the same views that I do in regard to the relative infrequency of contraction at the os internum as compared with that at the os externum. SECTION V. THE UTERUS SHOULD BE IN A NORMAL POSITION— i. e., NEITHER ANTEVERTED NOR RETRO VERTED TO ANY GREAT DEGREE. 16 SECTION V. THE UTERUS SHOULD BE IN A NORMAL POSITION L e., NEITHER ANTEVERTED NOR RETRO VERTED TO ANY GREAT DEGREE. Before treating of displacements of the uterus, let us first fix in our minds a correct idea of its normal position and relations. Not wishing to write one unnecessary page, I shall, as hitherto, avoid minute anatomical and histological detail, which can be better learned from anv of our text-books. I would say, however, that some of the discrepancies of authors may be reconciled when we remember that one speaks of the condition of things in the living subject, and another in the dead. Thus, one will tell us that the uterus is about two and a half inches deep, while another will say it is less. Both are right; for the uterus, an erectile organ, full of blood, is larger and longer in the living body than in the dead. The knowledge of one is gained in the clinic ; of the other in the dissecting-room. I do not know of any anatomical plates that repre- sent correctly the position and relations of the pelvic organs. The artist has not succeeded perfectly in this cut (fig. 89), but it is near enough to give us a good general idea of the subject. [I was at great pains to get a correct outline of a vertical section of the pelvic bones as here shown. For this I am under special obligations to M. Pean, of Paris, Prosecteur des Hopitaux, who politely afforded me every facility at Clamart, both in its museums and dead-house ; 228 UTERINE SURGERY. also to my talented young friend Edward Souchon, of New Orleans, Louisiana, who made for me repeated dis- sections, which were photographed, and from which Mr. Vien made the drawing.] Fig. 89. The uterus occupies, normally, very nearly a central position in the pelvis, being, perhaps, a little nearer to the sacrum than to the pubes. Its long axis should stand at about right angles to that of the vagina ; the fundus pointing in the direction of the umbilicus, and the os tincae towards the end of the coccyx. The fun- dus may be tilted a little one way or the other without the position being necessarily abnormal. The condition and contents of the bladder and rectum may temporarily influence it to some extent. If it turn forwards pr back- wards for 25 u or 30°, it does not amount to a malposi- tion ; but if to 40° in either direction without soon recti- fying itself, it is abnormal, and usually goes from bad to worse, till the malposition becomes persistent. A glance at the cut will show us that if the uterus fall backwards in a line drawn from the os to the promontory of 0m UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 229 sacrum, it will describe an angle of 45°, and will present its broadest surface to the pressure of the superincumbent viscera, which will necessarily force it eventually lower and lower ; and if it turn forward to the same extent, the same power exerted on its broad posterior surface neces- sarily increases this abnormal tendency. But an ante ver- sion never goes relatively to so great an extent as a retroversion, simply because it meets with more resist- ance. Anteversion often stops at 45°, but may go to 90°, as when we have a complete version, with the whole organ lying flatly down on the anterior wall of the vagina, and parallel with it, while a retroversion sel- dom or never stops under 90°, and often goes to 135°, simply because there is less opposition to its downward progress. It then follows that if the fundus of the uterus is found constantly lying just behind, or even near, the symphysis pubis, it is an anteversion ; but if it is found lying persistently back under the promontory of the sacrum, it is a retroversion. But when only the body of the uterus is turned forwards or backwards, the os seeming to be in rather a normal relation with the vagina, there is necessarily a bending of the cervix some- where between the os externum and the os internum, and we call this a flexion. Most, but not all, versions become flexions ; so that, as a general rule, they are but different stages or degrees of the same thing. I have not, therefore, thought it of practical importance to say that out of so many anteversions and retrover- sions, there was such a proportion of flexions, simply because these distinctions will not modify the general principles of treatment. Time was, and not very long ago, when the diagnosis uterine displacements was attended with great difii- 230 UTERINE SURGERY. culty, but there is nothing easier now. Formerly, all uterine disease was known under the sweeping term of prolapsus ; a term that has been used so vaguely and indefinitely that it should be banished from uterine tech- nology ; for in England it is applied to a descent of the organ through the vulvar outlet, while in my own coun- try it is often applied to its various intrapelvic devia- tions. Formerly, if any woman here had a little vesical tenesmus with a constant sense of weight in the pelvis, and bearing down, it was called a prolapsus ; but now we know very well that these symptoms may exist as a sign of engorgement, or granular erosion of the os, without the least displacement of the organ. To be accurate, then, the malposition should be ascer- tained exactly, and we should apply to it the term that would express precisely the deviation from a normal position. If we use the term retroversion, of course we all understand it, because its meaning is defined. If we say anteversion, for the same reason, there can certainly be no misunderstanding. If we say antero-lateral version, it is equally significant of the position, provided we add the qualifying adjectives, right or left, as the case may be. If we say procidentia, we mean that the cervix uteri has passed beyond the mouth of the vagina, to a greater or less degree ; but to say there is prolapsus is to hide up the real condition of the uterus under a vague generality. I therefore use the terms anteversion and retroversion to designate the relative deviations of the body of the uterus from a normal position while within the pelvic cavity, and the term procidentia to designate its passage out of the pelvis through the mouth of the vagina. Ante versions are often clu? to adventitious develop- ment of some sort in the anterior wall; retroversions UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 231 frequently occur as a sequence of debility, or relaxation in the ligaments that support the uterus. In both we often find an enlargement of that portion of the body which is most dependent. In the first, this enlarge- ment frequently induces the deviation; in the second, it is oftener the consequence of it. When we remember that about every eighth mar- riage is sterile, we see the necessity of investigating all particulars that can by any possibility bear upon the elucidation of this important subject. At the beginning (page 2) I said that I had, for obvious reasons, divided my sterile patients into two classes ; viz., natural, and acquired sterility. The following table shows at a glance what an influence mere displacements of the uterus must exercise over the sterile condition in each of these classes : — ? o °: 0f Anteversions. Retroversions. „ , Tot .^ Cases. ■ tt " lc c '°*" Malpositions. 1st Class 250 103 68 171 2nd Class 255 61 111 172 Total 505 164 179 343 Thus we see in 250 married women, who had never borne children, that 103 had ante version, and 68 retro- version ; while in 255 who had once borne children, but for some reason ceased to conceive before the natural termination of the child-bearing period, 61 had anteversion, and 111 retroversion, the sum total in each class bearing almost exactly the same relation to the number observed, being about two-thirds of the whole. Hence we infer that if the malposition exercises an influence to prevent conception in the one class, it is of equal importance in preventing it in the other. The mere position of the uterus is here stated without 232 UTERINE SURGERY. reference to causes or complications. T have purposely avoided saying how many of these had granulations, engorgements, hypertrophies, fibroids, ovarian cysts, or other complications. The table shows that two-thirds of all sterile women labour under some form of uterine displacement, without reference to the particular cause of such displacement; and that the anteversions and retroversions in the two classes are in inverse propor- tion : the anteversions in the first being about equal to the retroversions in the second ; and the retroversions of the first nearly the same as the anteversions of the second. Without further general remarks, let us proceed to consider in turn these various forms of displacement. I have not thought it worth while to make a distinct heading for anterolateral flexions. They comprise but a small class, and are almost always secondary, being the result of some other affection. Of Anteversion. — According to the tabulated state- ment above, nearly one-third of all sterile women have anteversion. In natural sterility the proportion is 1 in 2*42 ; in acquired, it is 1 in 4*18, being nearly twice as frequent in the first as in the second. It would here be appropriate to lay down the rules of diagnosis in reference to this particular form of dis- placement ; but as its principles have been already amply stated, whether by bi-manual palpation or probing (see pages 7, 8, and 101 to 105), it is unnecessary to repeat them here. I will now only say that we are never under any circumstances to probe the uterine cavity till we have by the touch first ascertained its probable direc- tion ; and then the sound is to be curved or not, accord- ing to the suspected curvature of the canal of the cervix. UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 238 Anteversion may depend upon a variety of causes ; sometimes the uterus seems to be bent upon its own axis, in consequence of an abnormal elongation of the organ. For instance, suppose the sound passes three inches and -a half into the cavity of the uterus, we would then say it is at least an inch too long. This must depend upon one of three things: either an elonga- tion of the intra-vaginal portion of the cervix ; elonga- tion of the supra-vaginal portion ; or hypertrophy of the fundus. If on the first, the touch, sight, and absolute measurement will at once determine it ; if on the second, the unerring bi-manual palpation will demonstrate to our sense of touch, a long, delicate, slender, flexible supra- vaginal cervix;' if on the third, it can be equally as well measured and judged by the touch alone, pro- vided we apply the principles of diagnosis already re- ferred to. We sometimes find the uterus undeveloped, entirely too small, often not more than an inch and a half deep; and again, it is not uncommon to find it over-developed, with the supra-vaginal portion of the cervix long and slender ; and when this is the case, the fundus must of necessity fall one way or another, and most usually forwards, producing anteversion or flexion. Again, anteversion seems to be occasionally the re- sult of a shortening of the utero-sacral ligaments ; or else these ligaments become shortened by the long-continued malposition. Nothing is more common in old retrover- sions than to see the anterior wall of the vagina con- tracted in consequence of the long-continued malposi- tion; and here it often presents a formidable barrier to a permanent rectification of the displacement. Now in the same way it is presumable that the utero-sacral ligaments, if not congenitally too short, may become 234 UTERINE SURGERY. shortened by long disuse, just as the round ligaments may become relaxed and lengthened by long error of position. Be this as it may, we sometimes meet with ante- versions where we encounter great difficulty, and inflict great pain in drawing the os tincse forwards. In these cases the vagina is long and narrow, and the os tincae, instead of pointing towards the end of the coccyx, may look directly back towards the hollow of the sacrum. Now, if we here insert a tenaculum into the anterioi lip of the os tincaa, and pull it towards the urethra, feel- ing at the same time unusual resistance to this traction, there will be one of two things to account for it : either the fundus of the uterus is bound down anteriorly by adhesions, or the cervix is held back posteriorly by shortened utero-sacral ligaments. If the first, which is very rare, then it will be impossible to elevate the fun- dus to a normal position by the usual method of elevat- ing the anterior cul-de-sac of the vagina up behind the inner face of the pubes with the left index finger, while the fundus is pushed backwards by the other hand act- ing upon it in the hypogastrium through the parietes of the abdomen ; but if it be due to the second, then, by introducing the index finger into the rectum, or even to the posterior cul-de-sac of the vagina, at the same time that we draw down the cervix with the tenaculum, we shall feel the utero-sacral ligaments as tense and resistent as two well-stretched guitar-strings. I must admit that such cases are not very common ; but their infrequency makes it the more important to be able to recognize them when we meet with them. One of the most common causes of anteversion is a small fibroid in the anterior wall, as represented in fig. 00. It is very interesting to observe the influence of UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 235 such tumours in producing the various displacements of the uterus. If a fibroid uot larger than an English walnut is attached in any way to the posterior wall of the uterus above the level of the os internum, it almost invariably pulls the uterus over backwards, producing retroversion ; but if a similar-sized tumour is attached to the posterior wall of the uterus below the level of the os internum, whether it be pedunculated or not, it will almost as invariably push the fundus of the uterus over forwards, or produce anteversion. In other words, a small tumour of the body of the uterus posteriorly will produce retroversion, while the same sized tumour of the cervix posteriorly will produce anteversion ; and vice versa, a small tumour in the anterior wall of the body anteverts the uterus, but if it grow anteriorly below the •~.tt> it Fig. 90. i'lG. 91. level of the os internum, it invariably retroverts it. The reasons are anatomical and most obvious. Let fio\ 91 represent the uterus in its normal relations with the axis of the vagina. A small tumour on the posterior wall at a will, as before said, retrovert the uterus, but a similar-sized one attached low down on the cervix at h will as invariably antevert it. In the first instance the 236 UTERINE SURGERY. uterus obeys the laws of gravity, by which an additional weight on one side of the fundus must pull it in the direction of said force ; while in the second instance, the tumour finds a point d'appui in the utero-sacral liga- ments, rectum, and cul-de-sac of the vagina, which oppose its downward pressure ; and thus, as the tumour grows, it gradually pushes the fundus forwards. For the same reasons a tumour anteriorly at d, as a rule, anteverts, while one at c invariably retroverts the uterus, because it finds a point of resistance in the walls of the bladder at its junction with the cervix. Another reason for this curious law of displacement in consequence of small growths on the supra-vaginal cervix may be found in the fact that the tumour acts like a splint upon the side of the naturally slender and flexible cervix. These rules are applicable to small tumours only, and all tumours must have had a small beginning. When they grow large enough to rest upon the brim of the pelvis, they elevate or depress the body of the uterus more by their volume and rela- tions to the pelvic cavity than by the mere place of their accidental attachment. I have in many instances seen the cervix curved, anteriorly where it seemed to be produced by an amor- phous growth on its posterior surface. The relative position and outline of this anomalous projection is represented, in fig. 92, a. I do not know what to call it ; it is not a fibroid tumour. To the touch it has a fibro-cartila^inous feel : I suppose I have seen a dozen cases of it. It is very uniformly of the Fig. 92. J J shape and form here represented, always pointed below ; it almost always projects, as UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 237 here, a little below the insertion of the vagina. I have never found anything like it growing on any other portion of the uterus. I have seen it in two cases in which there was no curvature of the cervix. Each of these was sterile, each had the cervix incised ; one conceived four months afterwards, the otjier in eight. Both of these had had metro-peritonitis some time before I saw them. From these two cases we may infer that this growth may possibly be the product of inflamma- tory action, and that it does not, per se, interfere with conception and child-bearing. In the other instances I could not trace its history to any predisposing cause. The first, case of this anomalous growth that I ever saw was in the Woman's Hospital, in 1856, in a young Irish girl, who had painful menstruation as the consequence of a curved contracted cervical canal. Dr. Emmet and myself called it the cock's-cornb excrescence. We called it this merely to give it a name. The name was sug- gested by the form of the growth, by its mobility, by its gristly feel, and by the manner of its attachment. It has a sessile attachment to the neck of the womb, perhaps half an inch wide above, growing narrower as it descends. It can be diagnosed with the greatest faci- lity by the bi-manual method of palpation. Indeed I never consider any obscure condition of the uterus thoroughly made out till we manipulate the whole surface of the organ almost as completely as if we had it outside of the body. This affection is not described in the books, but I have no doubt that others will find it where they have not, as yet, suspected anything of the sort ; and the professional mind once directed towards it, I have as little doubt that some one will be able, some time or other, to give us its pathological appear- ances from post-obit examinations. 238 UTERINE SURGERY. But to return to anteversions. We may have them from other causes. We often see granular engorgement of the anterior lip, accompanied by a corresponding engorgement, or hypertrophy of the anterior wall of the uterus. And here there is always anteversion. Some think that these corresponding conditions of the cervix and body anteriorly are pathologically one and the same thing ; but we often see the engorged condition of the os and cervix cured without the least impression being produced, either on the hypertrophy of the anterior wall or on the relative position of the fundus. We sometimes have the uterus bound down by liga- mentous adhesions, the result, most probably, of some former peritoneal inflammation. These cases are com- paratively rare ; but that they do exist is proved both by observation on the living, and by post-mortem examina- tion. We more frequently find ligamentous adhesions in retroversions tlun in anteversions. Of course we can do nothing for the rectification of malpositions dependent upon adhesions, nor as a rule will they require any interference, for the adhesions naturally sustain and support the uterus in its abnormal relations, and protect it against the pressure of the super- incumbent viscera, which would otherwise force it still lower in the cavity of the pelvis. In those cases in which I have found the uterus bound down by adhesions, there was little or no complaint of the symptoms ordinarily attendant upon such displacement. So far as the treatment of the sterile condition in connection with anteversion is concerned, I fear that our efforts must be confined almost wholly to seeing that the os tincse is open enough, that the cervix is of proper form and size, and that the secretions of the vagina and of the cervix are suited to the viability of the spermatozoa. UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 239 The introduction of the uterine sound by Simpson constitutes an era in obstetric surgery. Before this we knew as little about the rectification of displacements as we did about their diagnosis. It was, and is still, used as a redresser of displacements, in retroversions, with much show of science and precision, if not of skill and success ; but in anteversions with none of these. As a mere probe, it is, as I have said before, very valuable, although the practised touch seldom needs its aid ; but as a redresser, it is capable of doing great mischief, and should no longer be used as such. Even as a probe, merely to determine the course, curvature, and exact depth of the uterine cavity, it is possible to do harm with it. In anteversion I now seldom ever use it in the dorsal decubitus ; but place the patient in the left lateral semiprone position, as for all uterine operations. When the cervix is brought into view, it is pulled gently forwards by a small tenaculum (figs. 14 and 53), and then the annealed probe (fig. 40), more or less curved to suit the previously ascertained or suspected curvature of the canal, is to be introduced with great gentle- ness. As soon as it passes the os internum, it goes to the fundus al- most by its own weight, simply by elevating the handle of the instru- ment towards the sacrum. We can never do harm or even produce pain, if we adapt the size and curvature of the probe to the peculiarities of the individual case. We may occasionally need one not Fig. 93. 240 UTERINE SURGERY. larger than that shown in fig. 93, and we sometimes need to curve it quite as much iu complete anteflexion, such as are represented in figs. 41 and 60. Putting the cervix on the stretch by means of the tenaculum hooked into the anterior lip of the os greatly facilitates the use of the probe in difficult cases, by fixing the uterus and by straightening the curvature of the canal. I am sure that much harm has been done with the sound; 1st, by having it too large; 2nd, by having it too straight, or always fixed at the same curva- ture, as shown in fig. 39 ; and 3rd, by using too much force. Again let me repeat that we are never to forget that it is simply a probe, and that we are to handle it as delicately as we would a probe for any other surgical purpose. While we then accept the sound as a probe, we must wholly reject it as a redresser. For diagnosis it is valuable ; for treatment it is dangerous. During the learned discussion in the French Academy of Medicine a few years ago, on the uses and abuses of this instru- ment, the fact was fully established, that it had, per- haps more than once, been forced through the fundus uteri, and that death was the consequence of this rude and awkward accident. This could only have happened by using it with violence as a redresser. There is some show of philosophy to justify ics use in retroversion, but why it should ever have been used to replace an ante- verted uterus I cannot understand ; and yet I have seen patients with anteversion, who had for months been subjected to the introduction of the sound almost daily ; I need hardly add, without the least benefit. To replace in this way, or in any other, an anteverted uterus with the expectation of its remaining in a normal position by this means alone, is perfectly futile ; for it UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 241 invariably falls back into its abnormal position the very moment that the force is removed that replaced it. For the replacement of an anteverted uterus we need no instrument whatever. The process is simple enough, and is effected easier and better by mere manipulation than by any instrumental aid. The bladder empty, the patient on the back, introduce the left index finger, as shown in fig. 1, to the anterior cul-de-sac ; make pressure outwardly with the other hand, to be sure that the uterus is anteverted ; then remove the outer pressure, and with the index finger still resting a little anterior to the cervix, elevate the os tincae in the direction of the pubes, by carrying the anterior wall of the vagina on the point of the index finger up behind its inner face ; — this pressure bringing the cervix forwards and upwards, necessarily elevates the fundus from its bed behind the pubes and throws it slightly upwards ; — now push the ends of the fingers of the right hand on the outside from above, down into the hypogastrium closely behind the pubes, so that the fingers of the two hands shall feel that there is nothing between them but the thin walls of the abdomen and the thinner walls of the vagina and bladder. While the right hand is thus held firmly, the fingers occupying, as it were, the place just filled by the fundus uteri, quickly slide the left index from the anterior to the posterior cul-de-sac of the vagina, and push this before it till the finger lies snugly up behind the cervix uteri ; then elevate it, as it were, against the points of the fingers of the right hand, with which push back the fundus, and retrovert the whole organ while we hold it up almost in contact with the abdominal parietes. Thus we are able not only to straighten up the 16 242 UTERINE SURGERY. organ, but to manipulate every portion of the external surface of the uterus : the fundus and body, before we attempt to replace it (fig. 1) ; the remainder by the above manoeuvre. This is ordinarily easily done, even in very fat woman, because nature provides a sulcus between the fatty deposit in the walls of the abdomen, and the pubic covering in which the outer hand is readily carried down behind the pubes as above directed. We only find trouble in delicate, nervous, hysterical women, where there is involuntary spasm of the abdo- minal walls, or where the cervix uteri is firmly held back by shortened utero-sacrai ligaments. It is by thus passing the left index finger behind the cervix uteri, and then drawing the whole organ directly forwards, almost against the inner face of the pubes, and pushing the ends of the fingers of the outer hand down behind the uterus instead of before it, that we can dia- gnose with the greatest accuracy fibroid tumours, whether sessile or pedunculated, and such offshoots as are repre- sented in fig. 92, page 236. It was but the other day that a friend of great eminence in the profession asked my opinion in reference to a fibroid suspected to be in the posterior wall of the uterus. He was hesitating whether to attack it through the cavity of the uterus or through the cul-de-sac of the vagina. By this bimanual method of palpation alone, I was able in a moment to say that the tumour, nearly as large as the foetal head at term, was pedunculated, and that the pedicle, about an inch long and three-fourths of an inch thick, was attached to the posterior face of the uterus, about half-way between the insertion of the vagina and the fundus uteri (fig. 1)4). It is not necessary to say more about the peculiarities of the case here, except that in the UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 243 course of a few minutes my friend was perfectly con- vinced of. the exactness of the diagnosis. But to return to the subject of ante version. So far as the mechanical treatment of anteversion per se is con- FiG. 94. cerned, I know of but one instrument that has the power of rectifying the position perfectly and at once, and that is the intra-uterine stem (with disk) of Dr. Simpson. But unfortunately the risks of the instrument are too great ; and I know but three practitioners in my own country who have not, after repeated trials, discarded it altogether. These are Professor Peaslee and Professor Conant, of New York City, and Professor Mack, of Buffalo. In the practice of the Woman's Hospital, Dr. Emmet and myself were long ago compelled to discontinue its use, on account of frequent accidents, such as haemor- rhage, metritis, and pelvic cellulitis. Sometimes a small Meigs's gutta-percha ring will afford relief, not so much by rectifying the position as by elevating the organ slightly in the pelvis, and taking some of its weight from the bladder. Sometimes we derive considerable comfort from a small globe pessary, particularly if it can be made to rest just anterior to the cervix uteri. For 244 UTERINE SURGERY this purpose I have now and then attached a stem to the globe, which projects externally, and is curved ap over the pubes, to prevent the ball from running down into the posterior cul-de-sac. Fig. 95 will represent a very common form of ante- version. Now, if we introduce a globe pessary an inch and a quarter in diameter, it will ordinarily pass to the very bottom of the vagina at a, resting there under the cervix, and elevating it, while the fundus will be thereby rather depressed anteriorly than otherwise ; thus aggra- vating the malposition : but if we attach a malleable stem to the globe, and curve it externally at the proper length to prevent it from passing further than the anterior cul- de-sac, its tendency is to throw the fundus upwards in a normal direction by its pressure or traction on the an- terior wall of the vagina at b. Its action is readily understood by press- ing the index finger forcibly up behind the symphysis pubis, which easily elevates the anteverted uterus. If the ball be too large, its pressure here will retro vert the uterus, just as a tumour growing low down on the cervix anteriorly will throw the fundus backwards. But all instruments with external projections annoy and irritate a naturally sensitive nervous system, already rendered more irritable by disease, and are to be avoid- ed if possible, i It was the fashion a short time ago to use a sponge, with a string for its removal. To this practice there are two serious objections: 1st, nothing could be more disgusting than a sponge thus worn for six or eight hours ; and 2nd, the sponge always swells considerably by absorbing moisture, and soon patients feel the need UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 245 of increasing its size, and they generally get to intro- ducing two instead of one. The patient that once con- tracts the habit of wearing a spouge in the vagina will find it very difficult to break it up. But what is better than this, and, indeed, better than almost anything of the sort, is the application of a small wad of cotton, not more than an inch in diameter when moderately compressed, which may be used simple or moistened with glycerine, or otherwise medicated. In- stead of expanding, it gets smaller by the pressure of the parts. A pessary of simple cotton should never be retained more than twenty-four hours : moistened with glycerine, it may be worn two or three days, or till it come away spontaneously. The cotton pessary secured with a string for its removal, is to be applied by means of a porte-tampon, described and figured fur- ther on. In very aggravated cases of anteversion, where the whole organ lies flatly down on the anterior wall of the vagina aud parallel with it, we often, indeed almost always, find the vagina unusually deep, with the ante- rior wall greatly elongated. For such cases I devised and executed an operation in 1857, which has answered a most admirable purpose. It was under these circumstances. A lady was sent to me by Professor Josiah C. Nott, of Mobile, Alabama, in December, 1856, who had a most complete antever- sion, the fundus uteri being drawn down behind the inner face of the pubic symphysis by a fibroid tumour on the fundus anteriorly. Fig. 96 represents the rela- tive position of the uterus and tumour a. I have never seen a more complete anteversion. The diagram does not in any way exaggerate any of the details of the case. She had a cervical leucorrhcea, which was cured in a 246 UTERINE SURGERY. few weeks ; but the cystorrhcea, vesical tenesmus, and malposition, with its other inconveniences, persisted. For the relief of the displacement I tried all sorts of pessaries, but nothing did any good. ' The pelvis was Fig. 96. deep, the vagina capacious, the anterior wall unusually long, and the uterus laid down on and parallel with it. I discovered that the malposition could be entirely rectified by hooking a tenaculum in the anterior lip Fig. 97. of the os tincse, and drawing the cervix down towards the urethra. By continuing this traction till the cervix was brought forward about an inch and a half, the fuudus rose up in the pelvis into rather a normal position, not- UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 247 withstanding the weight of the tumour on its anterior portion. When the os tincse was thus drawn forwards, the elongated, relaxed anterior wall of the vagina was naturally folded upon itself, presenting the appearance of an enormous anterior cul-de-sac, as at d, fig. 97. Under these circumstances, could anything have been more positively indicated than an operation, to retain the uterus in the position in which it was thus held by the tenaculum ? The operation of shortening the elongated anterior wall of the vagina, by attaching the cervix uteri to it at the point , fig. 112, Pig. 112. pass up behind the neck of the womb, while the proxi- mal end a has a slight counter-curvature where it presses the neck of the bladder against the symphysis pubis. Great nicety is necessary in fitting an instrument so as not to injure by pressure the neck of the bladder, the posterior cul-de-sac, or the floor of the vagina, upon which rests the great curvature. It will be difficult to get one instrument with its exact proportions to fit any two cases ; and it is often difficult to fit any given case. It has frequently taken me a fortnight, and sometimes much longer, to adjust an instrument UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 273 accurately; and sometimes it has been utterly impossible for me to do it at all. When I succeed in fitting the case exactly, i. e. in supporting the womb in its normal position without undue pressure on the vaginal parietes, I usually send the model made of this malleable mate- rial to the instrument-maker, to be duplicated in vulca- nite or silver, if the patient is to leave my care wearing an instrument. The block-tin pessary is quite as good as a silver one ; but then the patient in removing and replacing it may spoil its shape, and make it hurtful instead of beneficial. If, however, the patient lives near enough for me to see her occasionally, I seldom order any other instrument than the block-tin one. As I said before, the case related on p. 266 gave me new views of practical utility, that were not lost ; for a lady, twenty-six years old, soon after this came with her husband to consult me on account of her sterility (ac- quired). She had had one child six years before. It died early, and they were exceedingly anxious for more offspring. She had been treated at different times by several distinguished physicians, all of whom put her through "a course of caustic,"* but her symptoms remained the same, and her sterility persisted. On examination, I found the pelvis deep, the vagina capa- cious, the perineum relaxed, and the uterus completely retroverted, but not difficult to replace. The posterior wall was, as in all such cases of prolonged malposition, somewhat hypertrophiecl, and there was also some little engorgement of the posterior lip. Her symptoms of vesical tenesmus, bearing down, &c, were evidently the result of the error of position, and I told them it was * It was unfortunately the fashion a few years ago in my own country to cau- terize the neck of the womb, without reference to conditions or indications. 18 274 UTERINE SURGERY. quite impossible for her to conceive with the uterus in its abnormal position. I concluded to treat the case entirely mechanically, but it was very difficult, for I did not then possess the tact in adapting an instrument to the peculiarities of the case, that observation and enlarg- ed experience can alone give. It took me nearly a month to adjust it so that it could be worn without pain or undue pressure ; but once fitted, there was no incon- venience from it ; on the contrary, the greatest comfort. The ring, moulded as described, was fully three inches and one-eighth in diameter before giving it the form of a sigmoid parallelogram. A special injunction was that it should be worn during sexual intercourse. Concep- tion occurred in three months. She continued to wear the instrument till after the third month, when the uterus had risen up above the brim of the pelvis, and then it was removed. She was delivered, at full term, of a fine healthy boy, which was turned over to a wet- nurse. She was in hopes that conception would soon occur again, but it did not ; and at the end of eighteen months she returned to ask an investigation of her con- dition, and, if necessary to insure an early conception, the reapplication of the instrument. I found the uterus precisely as it was when I first saw her. It had no self-adjusting power whatever. It could be replaced with facility, but dropped back as soon as the finger was removed. I gave it as my opinion that conception could hardly occur again with the uterus persistently retroverted. I therefore re- applied the same instrument with injunctions to wear it as before during coition. Conception occurred in eight weeks afterwards. About fifteen months after the birth of the second child, she came again, and I found the uterus precisely as it was at the first consultation. UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 275 I adjusted another instrument to prop it up, and gave the same injunctions, and in ten months afterwards she was again a mother. Now, in this case, I believe that conception could have been' brought about as easily five years sooner, if the same treatment had been adopted. To establish the utility of the pessary during coition, in cases of sterility dependent upon retroversion, I must continue my notes. The case above was uncom- plicated. There was simple relaxation of all the pelvic supports of the uterus, and it tilted over backwards, and will remain so always, unless it be propped up mechanically. Occasionally a malposition of this sort is cured by a pregnancy, but often it is not. In 1856, a lady was brought to the Woman's Hospital, who had been bed-ridden for more than two years. She was thirty-two years old ; was married at twenty ; gave birth to a child in ten months, but she remained sterile afterwards. She became a widow, and married again at thirty. Twelve months after- wards she ran hurriedly into the garden to bring in some clothes that had been hung out to dry. On reaching up quickly, she felt something suddenly give way in the pelvis ; she had great pain, and immediately went to bed, suffering also from nausea, vomiting, and excessive prostration. Her physician was sent for, and attended her for many months, but without much improvement. I found the uterus completely retro- verted, and greatly enlarged, with the fundus directed towards the left sacro-iliac symphysis. The enlargement, or rather elongation of the organ, was due to a fibrous tumour growing from the fundus, which explained its diagonal direction, for it was too long to lie retro verted in the median line. To remove the fibrous tumour was 276 UTERINE SURGERY. out of the question; to allow* the uterus to remain where I found it, was to consign her to her fate without an effort for her relief. My only hope of affording her any permanent benefit was in elevating the uterus, supporting it in position, and giving her the possibility of a conception. When it was so elevated into position, the tumour could be distinctly felt on the fundus, above the promontory of the sacrum. But of course it would fall back into its old position, as soon as the finger and the uterine elevator were removed. By repeating this every day for a week, the uterus became sufficiently tolerant of manipulation to allow the use of an intra- vaginal support. A malleable block-tin ring, about two inches and a half in diameter, w*as fashioned into the form of a parallelogram, and curved on its long axis, as already described, so as to give it a slight sigmoid flexure. The vagina was rather small, and great care was necessary not to inflict injury by undue pressure in the posterior cul-de-sac, or against the neck of the bladder and the symphysis pubis. The instrument was worn at first for a few hours, but soon it was worn dur- ing the whole day, and after a short time she was able to walk. In two or three months she returned home, not cured it is true ; but the uterus was elevated into a proper position, and there supported by the simple little contrivance already described. With the hope that conception would take place, she was directed to wear the uterine supporter always during coition. Six months after leaving the Hospital she returned for observation, and was found to be pregnant four months and a half, having conceived in six weeks after return- ing home. She had worn the instrument all the time except when she removed it for cleaning. She went the full term and was safely delivered. I UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 271 saw her some months after the birth of her child. The uterus was in its proper position, but the tumour was about the same. Without mechanical aid here, I do not see how it would have been possible to have done any- thing at all for this poor sufferer. There was nothing whatever attempted for her but the replacement of the dislocated uterus, with this vaginal splint, as it were, to support it in its proper relations. This case might be called cured, so far as the mere position of the womb was concerned. It is very probable that the fibrous tumour had existed a long time on the fundus, and that it assisted by its weight when the uterus was suddenly retroverted in holding it down in its abnormal position, and I have as little doubt that the same condition now assists in holding the uterus erect. The pelvis in this case was of ordinary capacity, while in the case pre- viously related it was very deep, with a rather straight sacral promontory. It might be supposed a priori that any instrument in the vagina would interfere with coition. I usually make it a rule to explain the necessity of the treatment to the husband as well as the wife. So far as our sex is concerned, the knowledge of the presence of a vaginal support might be an unpoetical association ; but if it is properly adjusted, it is not at all in the way. Some- times the wife has insisted that it was not necessary for the husband to know that the uterus was thus artificially braced up. The instrument should be neither too large nor too small, and should fit snugly up behind the symphysis pubis. In 1861 I was consulted by a young widow, who had a proposition of marriage. Daring her first marriage she had had one full term labour, and three or four mis- carriages at about the third month. Her physicians told 278 UTERINE SURGERY. her that she would probably always miscarry at the third month. It was her opinion that few men would many if they did not expect to be blessed with off spring, and she herself looked upon children as necessary to the complete happiness of married life. With these views she was unwilling to marry unless she could have some assurance that the habit of aborting could be broken up ; and upon this point my opinion was asked. I found the uterus completely retroverted, with some enlargement of the posterior wall from long error of position. I explained to her that her miscarriages were almost certainly due to the retroversion ; that conception would in all probability occur with her, and that the j)regnancy would go to its full term, provided the uterus was kept in its normal position, till it got large enough to rise above the brim of the pelvis. On this assurance the offer of marriage was accepted ; and in two months my patient was ready for its fulfilment. Having adjusted an instrument to hold the uterus in proper position, and having instructed her in its man- agement, the wedding day was fixed at the time she expected to finish the menstrual period. The marriage took place early in January, on the very day of the cessation of the flow. The happy couple immediately left for New Orleans, and in a month afterwards I received a note from my patient saying she was undoubt- edly pregnant. As she did not wish to consult any other physician, and as I was exceedingly anxious for her to pass the third month without a miscarriage, I directed her to wear the instrument till she quickened, and then to remove it. At the full term she was safely delivered. Now here was a case in which the husband had no idea that there had ever been any uterine disease or any UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 279 mechanical treatment, and does not know it to this day. The case is valuable as showing the protective power of a normal position against the dangers of abortion. There is no more common cause of abortion than retroversion, if we except imprudent and excessive coition, and for the simplest of all reasons. A retroverted womb is impregnated ; impregnation only aggravates the mal- position ; the uterus and its contents grow apace till it is jammed with the fundus under the promontory of the sacrum, from which it has no natural tendency to escape. When it gets to the third month, it must either rise above the brim of the pelvis, or throw off its contents. If it fail to do the one, the other generally takes place. If we do not detect the malposition, and rectify it in time, a miscarriage is the almost inevitable result. I am sure I have often prevented miscarriage by rectifying a retroverted uterus. Here is an example. A lady, twenty-eight years old, had had two labours at full term. Afterwards she had a miscarriage at the third month. She subsequently became pregnant, and at the end of two months and a half she was again violently threatened with all the symptoms of a speedy miscarriage. I found the uterus retroverted, with the cervix against the pubes, and the fundus jammed under the sacral promontory. The uterus was gently replaced, and a Meigs ring three inches in diameter was introduced to hold it in its proper position. The rectification of the malposition was imme- diately followed by a relief of all uterine symptoms. The instrument was worn for a month, bein^r changed every three or four days. She went the full time, and was safely delivered. This case serves very well as an illustration of a principle, and as an example of its class. The cases already narrated as exhibiting the influence 280 UTERINE SURGERY. of the pessary in facilitating conception, and, therefore, in curing the malposition, were such as had conceived previously. But I have frequently seen the same thing in the naturally sterile. In 1858 Dr. Silas D. Scuclder, then house-physician at the Woman's Hospital, found amongst the out-door patients a woman married ten years without issue, who was very desirous of offspring. She had retroversion, but what the complications were, if any, I do not know. However he fitted a malleable block-tin ring to the vagina, and she conceived in two months afterwards. He allowed her to wear the instru- ment long enough to guard against a miscarriage (three months), and she went the full term. In 1857 a lady from the South consulted me in reference to her sterility. She had been married fifteen years without conceiving. Her beautiful physique and fine general health were all that could be desired ; but she had painful menstruation. The uterus was retro- verted, and she had a fibrous tumour, as large as an English walnut, in the posterior wall, while the os was contracted and the cervix indurated. The uterine sound, sponge tent, and bi-manual pal- pation, showed that the enlargement a (fig. 113) was Fig. 113. a distinct tumour, and not a mere hypertrophy of tissue, as we so often see in old retroversions. The indications UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 281 were the same as if there had been no fibroid tumour ; viz., to enlarge the os and cervix by incision, and theu to adjust an instrument to hold the uterus in situ during coition. From the contraction of the os and the induration of the cervix, I was satisfied that the case would have been sterile even with a normal position of the uterus. Besides, given a perfect state of the os and cervix, the malposition would militate against the probabilities of conception. Therefore the os and cervix were divided bilaterally in April, 1857. The ring was fitted after the next menstruation in May, and in August she conceived ; but unfortunately a fall, three months afterwards, in November, produced a miscarriage ; and she had another miscarriage in June, 1858, at about the third month. This, too, was associated with an acci- dental fall. It was accompanied by great loss of blood, and followed by a serious metritic inflammation, from which she did not recover tor several weeks, during which time she was carefully attended by Dr. Griscom, of New York. As soon as she was able to leave the city, we sent her to Saratoga to recuperate, and she re- turned to New York in November, her general health being again very good. It was now eighteen months since we began to treat her case. She had had two mis- carriages, which we might have attributed to the fibroid tumour, if the attending circumstances had not each time been sufficient to have produced the unfortunate result. But the worst feature of the case was that we were now precisely where we started, for the metritic inflammation following the last miscarriage had repro- duced the contracted puckered condition of the os, which now looked as if it had never been subjected to a surgical operation ; while the cervix felt, perhaps, more gristly than before. What was to be done? We were 282 UTERINE SURGERY. all in a hurry for another conception. Her husband could not remain much longer away from home. I pro- posed to repeat the operation of incising the os and cervix, to which, like a true woman, she at once assent- ed, and it was done after the next menstruation. In a few weeks (January, 1859), she was pronounced, fit for the married, life. The os was open, and the uterus held erect by a well-adjusted instrument, which, as before, she was directed to wear during coition. Conception fortunately occurred just after the next menstruation, and we watched her most carefully during the whole period of utero-gestation. She wore the instrument nearly up to the time of quickening, when it was re- moved altogether. ■ She now acknowledged to having removed it as soon as she found out she was pregnant, each time before, which doubtless had much to do with the miscarriages that followed the falls. She went safely the full term, and was delivered by Dr. Grrisconi, of a son, on the 1st December, 1859. We kept this patient in the horizontal position for five or six weeks after confinement, with the hope that a perfect involution would be effected before she re- sumed the erect posture, and that the uterus might stand a good chance of remaining in its proper position afterwards without instrumental aid. When she left for the South, two mouths after her delivery, the uterus remained in a normal position ; but the best evidence of a perfect cure having been effected, is afforded by the fact that fifteen months after her confinement in New York, she was safely delivered of twins at her home in the South. This case is interesting in many particulars :— » 1st. It shows, what has been observed by others, and what I have seen many times before and since, UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 283 that a fibroid tumour does not necessarily impede conception, gestation, or delivery, all other things being equal. 2nd. It shows that it is possible, even in very diffi- cult cases, 'to understand the obstacles to conception, and to remove them by persistent continued effort, if our patient has sufficient fortitude and endurance. 3rd. It shows that it is possible to cure a retrover- sion, and even to cause the disappearance of a fibroid by the modified nutrition of utero-gestation. I am aware that this reiteration of cases is irksome ; but, as I have said before, I write mainly for the young and inexperienced ; and how am I to impress upon their minds the truth of my views but by giving them the facts and circumstances that have gradually led my own convictions where I myself find them, without any prejudices or preconceived opinions on the sub- ject? I could here detail many, very many cases like those already related ; but enough has been said, and I leave this part of the subject with the simple statement of the above facts, which strike me as having an important bearing on the subject under consideration. It might be supposed from what I have said about pessaries, that every case of retroversion is capable of being rectified by an instrument. If so, let me hasten to correct the error. I am sorry to say that there are numbers of cases in which a pessary is absolutely out of the question. In many women the vagina is so deli- cately organized that it is perfectly intolerant of any hard substance, and in a few, about the time of change of life, it will not bear the presence of a soft sponge, or even a bit of cotton. In some there is a chronic metritis, which forbids mechanical means ; and in 84 UTERINE SURGERY. others peri-uterine inflammation or a prolapsed inflamed ovary. We occasionally find a retroversion conjoined with an anteflexion. When this is the case, the infra-vaginal cervix is almost always too long; and we often find the supra-vaginal portion indurated, tender, and very sensi- tive, just above the insertion of the posterior wall of the vagina. In such cases it will be impossible for the patient to wear a pessary, on account of its pressure behind the cervix. I have not as yet amputated a cervix under these circumstances, but I am very sure that it would be better to do this, if we wish to treat the sterile condition successfully. I have been in the habit latterly of managing these obstinate cases simply by introducing a plug of fine cotton, or, as it is called in Eug- land, cotton-wool. I have alluded to this before, p. 245. A pessary of cotton can be worn with great comfort if the vagina itself is in a normal condition. In pre- paring it, we must be careful not to pull the cotton in pieces, but let it be one compact mass of the desired size, carefully tied in the middle with a strong thread for its ready removal. We may use it simply so, or medicated with glycerine or tannin, or anything else we may wish. If it is unmedicated, it must not be worn longer than twenty-four hours. It is enough to wear it while awake. If we use glycerine, we may leave this tampon pessary two or three days, or till it falls out. The glycerine is disinfectant, and the cotton remains without odour. It is important for the convenience and comfort of the patient, to teach her to apply and remove the cotton pessary herself. For this purpose I have invented a porte-tampon, which answers a most admi« rable purpose. UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 285 Fig. 114 represents the porte-tampon. The requisite quantity of cotton, tied in the middle with a strong thread some eight or ten inches long, is placed in the porte-tampon ; the lid is shut; the instrument is introduced like an ordinary speculum, the patient on the back ; it is to be pushed firmly and forcibly backwards and downwards under the cervix to the posterior cul- de-sac. When we are satisfied that it can go no further without producing pain, then the piston is to be pushed forwards ; the tampon is left in its place, and the instrument is withdrawn. The string previously attached to the cotton, hangs from the vagina, and with this the tampon is removed when necessary. One, and almost the only objection to the cotton nowadays, is its expensive- ness. Tow is much cheaper, and an- swers tolerably well. I have had many patients who could not remain long enough under treatment to be radically cured of engorgements, iJ. Fig. 116. of an irregular mass of fibroid tumours, which fill the pelvis and crowd the uterus down ; but not even then without the co-operating conditions above cited. In very old cases of procidentia, the vagina, from long exposure to the air, becomes dry, and assumes UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 289 almost a dermoid appearance. It is the opinion of many, that the cervix uteri is the first in the order of exit, that it always comes down, to open like a wedge the parts through which the whole mass descends. I cannot say, that this is not so at first, but I can with the greatest confidence say that it is not so in the great majority of cases, when they become chronic. Fig. 117. In an old procidentia, the vagina attains enormous proportions, in consequence of its being constantly expanded by the distending power of its hernial con- tents. To observe the order of descent in a case like this, reduce the parts to their normal relations, and let the patient force them out again, whether in the erect 19 290 UTERINE SURGERY. posture or on the back, and we shall see the anterior wall of the vagina, first forced downwards against the perineum, in the form of a cystocele ; a slight straining pushes this beyond the vulva, and the cervix follows immediately, bringing down the posterior wall of the vagina. If we would reduce a procidentia with ease, we must invert this order ; push back the posterior cul-de- sac first ; then the cervix ; and then the anterior wall of the vagina and bladder follow as a matter of course. Fig. 117 is from a photograph of a patient of Dr. Thierry-Meig, in Paris, and represents a cystocele as the first stage of procidentia. By a little effort she could effect its complete protrusion. She is a Grerman, twenty-three years of age, the mother of three children, the youngest being five months old. She is a street- sweeper, and has had procidentia ever since her last confinement. Besides this she has haemorrhoids, as seen in the cut. Sometimes we find the intra- vaginal cervix elongated, but oftener the supra- vaginal. Occasionally we see a complete descent of the whole uterus through the vulva. However, I have met with but few cases of this sort. One of these was shown to me by Dr. Chepmell, of Paris. It was the case of a maiden lady, some forty years old, who had been subject to it for twelve or fifteen years, and often suffered greatly from retention of urine, and the other ordinary attendants of this affection. The doctor tells me that he has repeatedly found the proci- dentia girdled by an ulcerated sulcus at its neck, and seemingly bordering upon the verge of sphacelus, in consequence of its obstructed circulation. Its great peculiarity consisted in the fact that the uterus was but one inch and a half deep. Many eminent medical men had seen the case before, and were of opinion that the UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 291 utero-cervical canal was obstructed at this depth by some mechanical barrier that prevented the further pas- sage of the probe ; but we were able to settle this point very easily, by palpation alone, while the uterus was in the pelvis-; and when it came down, it passed entirely through the vulva, and we could easily grasp it between the two hands, by passing the index-finger of one hand into the rectum, and hooking it forwards over the fundus, while pressure was made by the other on the front of the tumour, just below the urethra. Indeed we could even tilt the fundus downwards and backwards across the long axis of the procidentia ; and this move- ment gave us great facility in diagnosing the contents of this great hernial protrusion, which consisted of intestine as well as of uterus and bladder. In this case the vagina was immense, the perineum greatly relaxed, and the pubic rami unusually divergent. But while we only occasionally find a procidentia thus associated with a uterus, under or even of normal size, we often find it where there is hypertrophy of some part of this organ. For instance, there may be hyper- trophy of the cervix, or merely elongation of its intra- vaginal portion, or of the supra-vaginal portion ; if the former, the body of the uterus may be of normal pro- portions ; if the latter, it is more apt to be hypertro- phied. And sometimes the cervix is elongated in its two segments, both infra and supra-vaginal. In these cases of cervical elongation, we often find the utero-cervical canal four and five inches deep ; the supra-vaginal portion of the cervix being slender, atte- nuated, and, when examined per rectum, feeling not larger than the finger. This elongation is evidently secondary. I believe it to be a sequence of the procidentia, for we are more apt to find supra-vaginal elongation where the 900 UTERINE SURGERY. £i %1 *J fundus uteri is from some cause or other too large to pass out of the pelvis. If the body of the uterus passes out of the pelvis, there is no supra- vaginal elongation; if not, there is ; and for the simplest reason. Suppose the cervix uteri projecting through the vulva, the fundus, from some cause, cannot follow, but remains fixed, as it were, within the pelvis by hypertrophic or fibroid enlargement ; the cervix once through the vulva, pres- sure around it from above soon pushes down the two culs-de-sac, resulting in a de facto hernia. This gets larger and larger, and the uterus retained in the pelvic cavity becomes one of the principal points of support for this mass, which hangs by the cervix, and the cervix consequently becomes not hypertrophied but attenuated and elongated, feeling like a mere cord, not more than half its normal size. And this elongation is gradually produced by these two antagonistic forces ; one acting on the body of the uterus to retain it in the pelvic cavity, the other on the lower end of the cervix, to push it downwards. When the procidentia is due to a mass of tumours filling the pelvic cavity, and crowding the uterus down- wards, as I have seen in several instances, we cannot, I regret to say, promise much relief. Fig. 118 represents a procidentia of more than twenty years' standing, in a woman nearly seventy years of age, whose pelvis was filled with a number of small fibroids of bony hardness. One large tumour is not so apt to produce procidentia as several smaller ones, say from the size of an orange to that of the fist, loosely bound together; because the single one may grow large enough to rise above and rest upon the brim of the pelvis, while the smaller ones accommo- date themselves to the pelvic cavity, displacing what- UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 293 ever may interfere with their develornnent. The above was the largest hernial procidentia I have ever seen. It reached nearly half-way down the thighs, and con- tained a large quantity of intestine. When it was reduced She felt less comfortable than when it pro- truded. On this account no effort was made for its relief. Huguier has written extensively on procidentia Fig. 118, uteri, find I believe he was the first to point out the distinctive characteristics of its anatomical peculiarities. He found elongation of the cervix in all cases, either above or below the insertion of the vagina; and he suggested and performed amputation of the neck of the uterus in every case, and with great success. For 294 UTERINE SURGERY. special information in regard to his views, I must refer the reader to his memoir.* I amputate the cervix only when its lower segment is too large or too long, and projects so far into the vagina as to present a mechanical obstacle to the retention of the uterus in situ when replaced. This will be sufficient in some cases, such as that met with by Dr. A. K. Gardner, of New York, who amputated a cervix weighing §iv. 3 1 j - 3ij., which is, perhaps, "the largest on record as having been removed during life."f Dr. Gardner says, "The organ drew up far into the vagina after the portion was removed, and in order to arrest a persistent haemorrhage it was necessary to draw it down into view with hooks." Of course all such cases as this are readily cured by amputation, and, as a rule, it is the only thing to be done. But this is nob a type of the great class of cases that w r e are called upon to treat. If there should be elongation of the infra- vaginal cervix, amputation is the remedy ; but we often find procidentia without any extraordinary elongation of the infra-vaginal portion of the cervix. There is then nothing to amputate. ■ In these cases Mr. Baker Brown, Dr. Savage, and others, contract the vulvar outlet by the perineal opera- tion ; but generally I prefer to narrow the vagina above, which usually very effectually retains the uterus in some- thing like a normal position within the pelvis. * " Memoire sur les Allonge ments hypertrophiques du Col de 1' Uterus dans les Affections designees sous les noms de Descente, de Precipitation de cet Organe, et sur leur traitement par la resection, ou 1 amputation de la totalite du Col, suivant la variete de la Maladie." Par P. C. Huguier, Membre de l'Academie Imperiale deMedecine, &c. Paris: J. B. Bailliere et Fils. 1860. t "Amputation of the Cervix Uteri." By A. K. Gardner, M.D , Pro£, &c. &c. UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 095 The idea of narrowing the vagina is by no means new. I suppose we may justly claim it for the great Marshall Hall. However I do not think the operation ever succeeded till my own day, — and this success is due wholly to metallic sutures. I propose now to give a brief sketch of the steps by which we arrived at the method of operating herein advocated. In 1856, Dr. Warren Stone and Dr. Axson, of New Orleans, referred a patient of theirs to my care, who had had procidentia for three years. She was about thirty years of age, tall, slender, and bony, and had enjoyed good health till the yellow-fever epidemic of 1853, in New Orleans. The labour, lifting, and fatigue which she underwent as a nurse during that terrible epidemic left her with a double inguinal hernia and a complete procidentia uteri. I have seldom seen a more distressing case. She wore a double truss for the hernial protrusions ; and, for the procidentia, the largest globe-pessary that I ever saw. But notwithstanding the immense size of the globe, which was nine inches in cir- cumference, it was impossible for her to retain it in the vagina by any bandage ; so it was constantly slipping away, and that too at rather inopportune moments. I arranged a pessary with a stem and a " ' bandage, which kept the parts within the pelvis. In the course of two months she had regained some 25 pounds of flesh, and was on the eve of returning home harnessed up with trusses and bandages to a most uncomfortable degree, when I happened to ask her if she would be willing to submit to a surgical operation, if we could promise to get rid of the pessary and its bandage. She promptly replied, "Yes." Previously to this we had been in the habit of per- 29Q UTERINE SURGERY. forming the perineal operation after the plan of Mr. Baker Brown, and for some reason we had not been successful. Dr. Emmet and myself both thought that we could hardly promise any better success by it in this case than we had formerly met with. This was the first time that I had had a good opportunity of observing and studying the manner in which the procidentia occurred. After replacing it and allowing it to descend again, which always occurred very quickly on assuming the erect posture, I noticed, as before described, that the descent was not at first by the protrusion of the cervix uteri, but invariably by a prolapse of the anterior wall of the vagina, which always preceded the cervix, and drew down the uterus. I found that this cystocele was but another hernia (she had double inguinal hernia), and I discovered that she could not force it down again, when simply the point of the index finger was held in the auterior cul-de-sac. Then by pinching up the ante- rior wall of the vagina into a longitudinal fold, with two tenacula or a pair of forceps, I saw that the parts had no tendency whatever to come down ; and that it was impossible for our patient to force them down if we thus prevented the anterior wall of the vagina from descend- ing. Hence the idea of wholly removing the redundant portion of the anterior wall of the vagina occurred to me ; but it did not occur to me to operate simply by removing strips of vaginal mucous membrane. I seri- ousty proposed to this lady to make a complete vesico- vaginal fistula, by removing at once, as it were, a large portion of the base of the bladder with the anterior wall of the vagina. She agreed to it ; and I laid the plan of operating before the Consulting Board of the Hospital, and it was adopted. The vagina and its outlet were enormous. When the patient was placed on the knees, UTERINE DISPLACEMENTS. 297 or on the left side, with the perineum elevated by the speculum, it presented about the relative proportion shown in fig. 119. The measurements made repeatedly by Dr. Emmet and myself, gave the following propor- FiG. 119. tions. From the meatus urinarius to the perineum, a to Z>, when this was pulled back by the speculum, was three inches ; from the meatus urinarius to the pos- terior cul-de-sac, a to