. THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES arijfcne oPfTis Ma. n I THE WORKS FRANCIS BACON, BARON OF VERULAM, VISCOUNT ST. ALBAN, AND LORD HIGH CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND. COLLECTED AND EDITED BY JAMES SPEEDING, M.A. OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE ; ROBERT LESLIE ELLIS, M.A. I.ATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; AXD DOUGLAS DENON HEATH, UARRISTER-AT-LAW : LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. VOL. I. LONDON: LONGMAN AND CO. ; SIMPKIN AND CO. ; HAMILTON AND CO. ; WIIITTAKER AND CO. ; J. BAIN ; E. HODGSON ; WASHBOTJRNE AND CO. ; H. G. BOHN ; RICHARDSON BROTHERS : HOTJLSTON AND CO. ; BICKERS AND BUSH ; m WILLIS AND SOTHERAN ; J. CORNISH ; L. BOOTH ; AND J. SNOW. 1857. The right of translation is reseri-ed. LONDON : Printed by SPOTTISWOODE & Co. New-street-Square. HISTORY AND PLAN THIS EDITION. BACON'S works were all published separately, and never collected into a body by himself ; and though he had deter- mined, not long before his death, to distribute them into consecutive volumes, the order in which they were to suc- ceed each other was confessedly irregular; a volume of moral and political writings being introduced between the first and second parts of the Instauratio Magna, quite out of place, merely because he had it ready at the time. 1 In arranging the collected works therefore, every editor must use his own judgment. Blackbourne, the first editor of an Opera Omnia 2 , took the Distributio Operis as his groundwork, and endea- voured first to place the various unfinished portions of the Instauratio Magna in the order in which they would have stood had they been completed according to the original design ; and then to marshal the rest in such a sequence that they might seem to hang together, each leading by a natural transition to the next, and so connecting themselves into a kind of whole. But the several pieces were not written with a view to any such connexion, which is alto- gether forced and fanciful ; and the arrangement has this 1 Debuerat sequi Novum Organum : interposui tamen Scripta mea Moralia et Politica, quia magis erant in promptu Atque hie tomus (ut diximus) interjectus est et non ex ordine Instaurationis." Ep. ad Fulgenthnn, Opuscula, p. 172. 2 Francisci Raconi, -c., Opera Omnia, rjuatuor voluminibus compreliensa. Londmi, MDCC'XXX. A 2 3069469 IV HISTORY AND PLAN great inconvenience it mixes up earlier writings with later, discarded fragments with completed works, and pieces printed from loose manuscripts found after the author's death with those which were published or prepared for publication by himself. Birch, the original editor of the quarto edition in four volumes 1 \vhich (reprinted in ten volumes octavo) has since kept the market and is now known as the " trade edition," followed Blackbourne's arrangement in the main, though with several variations which are for the most part not improvements. The arrangement adopted by Mr. Montagu 2 is-in these respects no better, in all others much w r orse. M. Bouillet, in his (Euvres Philosophiques de Francois Bacon 3 , does not pro- fess to include all even of the Philosophical works ; and he too, though the best editor by far who has yet handled Bacon, has aimed at a classification of the works more systematic, as it seems to me, than the case admits, and has thus given to some of the smaller pieces a prominence which does not belong to tbem. In the edition of which the first volume is here offered to the public 4 , a new arrangement has been attempted ; the nature and grounds of which I must now explain. When a man publishes a book, or writes a letter, or delivers a speech, it is always with a view to some parti- cular audience by whom he means to be understood without the help of a commentator. Giving them credit for such knowledge and capacity as they are presumably furnished with, he himself supplies what else is necessary to make his meaning clear ; so that any additional illustrations would be 1 The Works of Francis Bacon, &c., in five volumes. London, 1 763. 2 The Works of Francis Bacon, Lord Chancellor of England. A new edition by Basil Montagu, Esq. London, 1825-34. * Paris, 1834. 4 The announcement in Messrs. Longman's monthly list for December was made without my knowledge, or I should have objected to it as apparently implying that a volume would be published every month until the whole work were completed. The fact is that the first three volumes, which include the whole of the Philosophical works, are ready now and will appear at monthly intervals ; the 4th and 5th containing the translations, and the 6th and 7th containing the Literary and Professional works will I hope be ready to follow in order. But I cannot make any promise at present as to the time when the remaining portion will be ready. OF THIS EDITION. to that audience more of a hindrance than a help. If how- ever his works live into another generation or travel out of the circle to which they were originally addressed, the conditions are changed. He now addresses a new set of readers, differently prepared, knowing much which the others were ignorant of, ignorant of much which the others knew, and on both accounts requiring explanations and elucidations of many things which to the original audience were suffi- ciently intelligible. These it is the proper business of an editor to supply. This consideration suggested to me, when consulted about a new edition of Bacon, the expediency of arranging his works with reference not to subject, size, language, or form but to the different classes of readers whose require- ments he had in view when he composed them. So classi- fied, they will be found to fall naturally into three principal divisions. First, we have his works in philosophy and general literature ; addressed to mankind at large, and meant to be intelligible to educated men of all generations. Secondly, we have his works on legal subjects ; addressed to lawyers, and presuming in the reader such knowledge as belongs to the profession. Thirdly, we have letters, speeches, charges, tracts, state-papers, and other writings of business; relating to subjects so various as to defy classification, but agreeing in this they were all addressed to particular per- sons or bodies, had reference to particular occasions, assumed in the persons addressed a knowledge of the circumstances of the time, and cannot be rightly understood except in relation to those circumstances. In this division every thing will find a place which does not naturally fall into one of the two former ; and thus we have the whole body of Bacon's works arranged in three sufficiently distinguishable classes, which may be called for shortness, 1st, The PHILO- SOPHICAL and LITERARY ; 2nd, The PROFESSIONAL ; and 3rd, The OCCASIONAL. In each of these there is work for an editor to do, but the help he can render differs in the several cases both in A 3 vi HISTORY AND PLAN nature and amount, and requires qualifications differing 1 ac- cordingly. To understand and illustrate the Philosophical works in their relation to this age, a man must be not only well read in the history of science both ancient and modern, but himself a man of science, capable of handling scientific questions. To produce a correct text of the Professional works and supply what other help may be necessary for a modern student, a man must be a lawyer. To explain and interpret the Occasional works, and set them forth in a shape convenient for readers of the present generation, a man must have leisure to make himself acquainted by te- dious and minute researches among the forgotten records of the time with the circumstances in which they were written. Now as it would not be easy to find any one man in whom these several qualifications meet, it was thought expedient to keep the three divisions separate, assigning each to a separate editor. It was agreed accordingly that the Philosophical works should be undertaken by Mr. Robert Leslie Ellis ; the Professional works by Mr. Douglas Denon Heath ; the Occasional and the Literary works by me ; each division to be made complete in itself, and each editor to be solely responsible for his own part of the work. Such was our original arrangement. It was concluded in the autumn of 1847 and Mr. Ellis, whose part was to come first, had already advanced so far that he expected to have it ready for the press within another half year, when unhappily about the end of 1849 he was seized with a rheu- matic fever, which left him in a condition of body quite incompatible with a labour of that kind. At which time, though the greater portion was in fact done, he did not con- sider any of it fit to be published as it was ; many blanks having been left to be filled up, and some doubtful notes to be corrected, in that general revision which the whole was to have undergone before any part were printed. It was long before he could finally resolve to abandon his task. As soon as he had done so, he handed all his papers over to me, with permission to do with them whatever I thought best. And OF THIS EDITION. Vll hence it is that my name appears in connexion with the Philosophical works ; with which otherwise I should not have presumed to meddle. As soon however as I had arranged and examined his papers, I felt that, however imperfect they might be com- pared with his own ideal and with what he would himself have made them, they must on no account be touched by anybody else ; for that if any other man were allowed to make alterations in them, without notice, according to his own judgment, the reader could have no means of knowing when he was reading the words of Mr. Ellis and when those of his editor, and so their peculiar value would be lost. Perfect or imperfect, it was clear to me that they must be kept as he left them, clear of all alien infusion ; and not knowing of any one who was likely to take so much inte- rest or able to spend so much time in the matter as myself, I proposed to take his part into my own hands and edit it ; provided only that I might print his notes and prefaces exactly as I found them ; explaining the circumstances which had prevented him from completing or revising them, but making no alteration whatever (unless of errors obviously accidental which I might perhaps meet with in verifying any of the numerous references and quotations) without his ex- press sanction. That the text should be carefully printed from the proper authorities, and all the bibliographical in- formation supplied which was necessary to make the edition in that respect complete, this I thought I might venture to promise. And although I could not undertake to med- dle with purely scientific questions, for which I have neither the acquirements nor the faculties requisite, or to bring any stores of learning, ancient or modern, to bear upon the va- rious subjects of inquiry, although I had no means, I say, of supplying what he had left to be done in those depart- ments, and must therefore be content to leave the work so far imperfect, yet in all matters which lay within my com- pass I promised to do my best to complete the illustration and explanation of the text ; adding where I had anything Vlll HISTORY AND PLAN to add, objecting where I had anything to object, but always distinguishing as my own whatever was not his. To this proposal he agreed, as the best course that could be taken in the circumstances. Early in 1853 I took the work in hand ; and in the three volumes which follow, the reader will find the result. The things then for which in this division I am to be held responsible are 1st. All notes and prefaces marked with my initials, and all words inserted between brackets, or otherwise distinguished as mine. 2dly. The general distribution of the Philosophical works into three parts, whereby all those writings which were either published or intended for publication by Bacon himself as parts of the Great Instauration are (for the first time, I believe) exhibited separately, and distinguished as well from the independent and collateral pieces which did not form part of the main scheme, as from those which, though originally designed for it, were afterwards superseded or abandoned. 3dly. The particular arrangement of the several pieces within each part ; which is intended to be according to the order in which they were composed ; a point however which is in most cases very difficult to ascertain. For the grounds on which I have proceeded in each case, and for whatever else in my part of the work requires ex- planation, I refer to the places. But there are two or three particulars in which this edition differs from former ones, and which may be more conveniently explained here. In the third and last division of the entire works, accord- ing to the scheme already explained, every authentic writing and every intelligibly reported speech of Bacon's (not be- longing to either of the other divisions) which can be found in print or in manuscript will be set forth at full length, each in its due chronological place ; with an explanatory nar- rative running between, in which the reader will be supplied to the best of my skill and knowledge with all the information OF THIS EDITION. ix necessary to the right understanding of therm In doing this, since the pieces in question are very numerous, and scattered with few and short intervals over the whole of Bacon's life, I shall have to enter very closely into all the particulars of it ; so that this part when finished will in fact contain a complete biography of the man, a biography the most copious, the most minute, and by the very necessity of the case the fairest, that I can produce ; for any material mis- interpretation in the commentary will be at once confronted and corrected by the text. The new matter which I shall be able to produce is neither little nor unimportant ; but more important than the new matter is the new aspect which (if I may judge of other minds by my own) will be imparted to the old matter by this manner of setting it forth. I have generally found that the history of an obscure transaction be- comes clear as soon as the simple facts are set down in the order of their true dates ; and most of the difficulties pre- sented by Bacon's life will be found to disappear when these simple records of it are read in their natural sequence and in their true relation to the business of the time. By this means a great deal of controversy which would disturb and encumber the narrative, and help to keep alive the memory of much ignorant and superficial criticism which had better be forgotten, will I hope be avoided. And until this is done I do not think it desirable to attempt a summary biography in the ordinary form. Such a biography may be easily added, if necessary, in a supplemental volume ; but I am persuaded that the best which could be written now would be condemned afterwards as altogether unsatisfactory. It is true however, that a reader, before entering on the study of an author's works, wants to know something about himself and his life. Now there exists a short me- moir of Bacon, which was drawn up by Dr. Rawley in 1657 to satisfy this natural desire, and prefixed to the Re- suscitatio, and is still (next to Bacon's own writings) the most important and authentic evidence concerning him that we possess. The origin cf Dr. Rawley's connexion with X HISTORY AND PLAN Bacon is not known, but it must have begun early. It was in special compliment to Bacon that he was presented on the 18th of January, 1616 17> (being then 28 years old,) to the rectory of Landbeach ; a living in the gift of Benet's College, Cambridge. 1 Shortly after, Bacon becom- ing Lord-Keeper selected him for his chaplain ; and during the last five years of his life, which were entirely occupied with literary business, employed him constantly as a kind of literary secretary. Nor did the connexion cease with life ; for after Bacon's death Rawley was intrusted by the ex- ecutors with the care and publication of his papers. Raw- ley's testimony must therefore be regarded as that of a witness who, however favourable and affectionate, has the best right to be heard, as speaking not from hearsay but from intimate and familiar knowledge during many years and many changes of fortune ; and as being moreover the only man among Bacon's personal acquaintances by whom any of the particulars of his life have been recorded. This memoir, which was printed by Blackbourne, with inter- polations from Dugdale and Tenison, and placed in front of his edition of 1730, but is not to be found I think in any more modern edition, I have printed entire in its original shape ; adding some notes of my own, by help of which it may serve a modern reader for a sufficient biogra- phical introduction. The Latin translation of it, published by Rawley in 1658 as an introduction to a little volume entitled Opuscula Phi- losophica, and now commonly prefixed to the De Auymentis Scientiarum, I have thought it superfluous to reproduce here ; this edition being of little use to those who cannot read English, and the translation being of no use to those who can. And this brings me to the second innovation which I have ventured to introduce. 1 " Ad quam prsesentatus fuit per honorand. virum Franciscum Bacon mil. Regiac maj. advocatum generalem, ejusdem vicaviae [rectorise] pro hac unica vice, ratione concessions magistri ct sociorum Coll. C. C. (uti asserebatur) patronus." Collections prefixed to Blackbourne's edition 1730, i. 218. Bacon's father was a member and benefactor of Benet's ; which accounts for this compliment. OF THIS EDITION. xi Bacon had no confidence in the permanent vitality of Eng- lish as a classical language. " These modern languages," he said, " will at one time or other play the bankrupts with books." Those of his works therefore which he wished to live and which were not originally written in Latin, he trans- lated or caused to be translated into that language "the universal language," as he called it. This, for his own time, was no doubt a judicious precaution. Appearances however have greatly changed since ; arid though it is not to be feared that Latin will ever become obsolete, it is certain that Eng- lish has been rapidly gaining ground upon it, and that of the audience whom Bacon would in these days have especially desired to gather about him, a far greater number would be excluded by the Latin dress than admitted. Considering also the universal disuse of Latin as a medium of oral communi- cation, and the almost universal disuse of it as a medium of communication in writing, even among learned men, and the rapid spreading of English over both hemispheres, it is easy to predict which of the two languages is likely to play the bankrupt first. At any rate the present edition is for the English market. To those who are not masters of English it offers few attractions ; while of those who are, not one I suppose in a hundred would care to read a translation even in Baconian Latin, when he had the choice of reading the original in Baconian English. And since the translations in question would increase the bulk of this work by four or five hundred pages and the cost in proportion, it has been thought better to leave them out. In one respect, it is true, they have a value independent of the English originals. Having been made later and made under Bacon's own eye, the differences, where they are greater than can be naturally accounted for by the dif- ferent idiom and construction of the languages, must be con- sidered as corrections ; besides which, when the meaning of the original is obscure or the reading doubtful, they serve sometimes as a glossary to decide it. This being an ad- vantage which we cannot afford to sacrifice, I have thought xii HISTORY AND PLAN it my duty in all instances to compare the translation care- fully with the original, and to quote in foot-notes those pas- sages in which the variation appeared to be material ; and as this is a labour which few readers would take upon them- selves, I conceive that by the course which I have adopted the English student will be a gainer rather than a loser. I have also departed from the practice of former editors in not keeping the Latin and English works separate. Such separation is incompatible with the chronological ar- rangement which I hold to be far preferable. I see no inconvenience in the change which is at all material ; and I only mention it here lest any future publisher, out of re- gard to a superficial symmetry, should go back to the former practice and so destroy the internal coherency of the present plan. It may be thought perhaps that in arranging the works which were to form parts of the Great Instauration, I ought to have followed the order laid down in the Distributio Ope- ris, marshaling them according to their place in the scheme rather than the date of composition j and therefore that the De Augmentis Scientiarum which was meant to stand for the first part, should have been placed before the two books of the Novum Organum, which were meant for the com- mencement of the second. But the truth is that not one of the parts of the Great Instauration was completed according to the original design. All were more or less abortive. In every one of them, the De Augmentis and the Novum Or- ganum itself not excepted, accidental difficulties, and con- siderations arising out of the circumstances of the time, interfered more or less with the first intention and induced alterations either in form or substance or both. They can- not be made to fit their places in the ideal scheme. ,It was the actual conditions of Bacon's life that really moulded them into what they are ; and therefore the most natural order in which they can be presented is that in which they stand here; first, the Distributio Qperis, setting forth the perfect work as he had conceived it in his mind, and then the series of OF THIS EDITION. xiii imperfect and irregular efforts which he made to execute it, in the order in which they were made. The text has heen corrected throughout from the original copies, and no verbal alteration (except in case of obvious errors of the press) has been introduced into it without notice. The spelling in the English works has been altered according to modern usage. I have endeavoured however to distinguish those variations which belong merely to the fashion of orthography from those which appear to involve changes in the forms of words. Thus in such words as president (the invariable spelling in Bacon's time of the substantive which is now invariably written precedent, and valuable as showing that the pronunciation of the word has not changed), prejudice, fained, mathematiques, chymist, &c., I adopt the modern form ; but I do not substitute lose for leese, politicians for politiques, external for externe, Solomon for Salomon, accommodated for the past participle accommodate ; and so on ; these being changes in the words themselves and not merely in the manner of writing them. In the spelling of Latin words there are but few differences between ancient and modern usage ; but I have thought it better to preserve the original form of all words which in the original are always or almost always spelt in the same way ; nsfcetix, author, chymista, chymicus, Sfc. In the matter of punctuation and typography, though I have followed the example of all modern editors in altering at discretion, I have not attempted to reduce them entirely to the modern form ; which I could not have done without sometimes introducing ambiguities of construction, and some- times deciding questions of construction which admit of doubt. But I have endeavoured to represent the effect of the original arrangement to a modern eye, with as little departure as possible from modern fashions. I say endea- voured ; for I cannot say that I have succeeded in satisfying even myself. But to all matters of this kind I have at- tended personally ; and though I must not suppose that my mind has observed everything that my eyes have looked at, XIV HISTORY AND PLAN I am not without hope that the text of this edition will be found better and more faithful than any that has hitherto been produced. It was part of our original design to append to the Philo- sophical works an accurate and readable translation of those originally written in Latin ; at least of so much of them as would suffice to give an English reader a complete view of the Baconian philosophy. Mr. Ellis made a selection for this purpose. Arrangements were made accordingly ; and a translation of the Novum Organum was immediately be- gun. As successive portions were completed, they were for- warded in the first instance to myself ; were by me carefully examined ; and then passed on to Mr. Ellis, accompanied with copious remarks and suggestions of my own in the way of correction or improvement. Of these corrections Mr. Ellis marked the greater part for adoption, improved upon others, added many of his own, and then returned the manuscript to be put into shape for the printer. But as he was not able to look over it again after it had received the last corrections, and as the translator did not wish to put his own name to it, and as this edition was to contain nothing for which somebody is not personally responsible, I have been obliged to take charge of it myself. In my final revision I have been careful to preserve all Mr. Ellis's cor- rections which affect the substance and sense of the trans- lation. In matters which concern only the style and manner of expression, I have thought it better to follow my own taste ; a mixture of different styles being commonly less agreeable to the reader, and mine (as the case now stands) being necessarily the predominating one. For the same reason I have altered at discretion the translation of the prefaces, &c. which precede the Novum Organum ; which were done by another hand, and have not had the advantage of Mr. Ellis's revision. For those which follow, the translator (Mr. Francis Headlam, Fellow of University College, Oxford) will himself be responsible. OF THIS EDITION. XV Though this volume is already twice as thick as I would have had it, I must add a few words concerning 1 the portraits of Bacon ; a subject which has not received the attention which it deserves, and upon which, if picture-dealers arid collectors and inheritors of family portraits would take an interest in it, some valuable light might probably be thrown. The portrait in the front of the volume is taken from an old engraving by Simon Pass ; which came, (as Mr. Smith of Lisle Street informed me, from whom I bought it some years ago,) out of a broken-up copy of Holland's Baziliologia. 1 The original has a border, bearing the words HONORATISS : D s . FRANCISCUS BACON '. EQUES AU : MAG : SIGILL ! ANGL '. cusTos. Above are his arms, with the motto MONITI ME- LIORA. Below the chancellor's bag, on which the left hand rests. These accessories, as being presumably the device of the engraver and not suitable to the modern style which has been preferred for the copy, have been dispensed with ; but the inscription underneath lias been copied verbatim 2 , and enables us to fix the date of the work. Bacon was created Lord Chancellor on the 4th of January, 1617-18, and Baron Verulam on the 1 2th of the following July ; and as it is not to be supposed that his newest title would have been omitted on such an occasion, we may infer with tolerable certainty that the engraving was published during the first half of the year 1618. Below this inscription are engraved in small letters the words " Simon Passceus sculpsit L. Are to be sould by John Sudbury and George Humble at the signe of the white horse in Pope's head Ally" The plate ap- pears to have been used afterwards for a frontispiece to the Sylva Sylvarum, which was published in 1627, the year after Bacon's death. At least I have a copy of the second 1 This work was published in 1618; and though one would not expect from the title to find Bacon there, Brunet mentions a copy in the Biblioth. du Roi at Paris " qui, outre les portraits qui composent ordinairement. le recueil, renferme encore d'autres portraits du meme genre, representants des reines, des princes du sang, et des seigneurs de la cour des Rois Jacques I er et Charles I or ," &c. The copy in the British Museum has no portrait of Bacon ; but as the plates are not numbered, and there is no table of contents, one cannot be sure that any copy is perfect. 2 The righte Honourable S r Frauncis Bacon knight, Lorde highe Chance-Hour of Englande and one of his Ma* 1 " most hon bl privie Counsel!. xvi HISTORY AND FLAN edition of that work (1628) in which the same print is in- serted, only with the border and inscription altered ; the title which originally surrounded it, together with the Chan- cellor's bag and the names of the engraver and publishers, being erased ; the coat of arms altered ; and the words underneath being changed to The riyht Hon ble Francis Lo. Verulam> Viscount S* Alban. Mortuus 9 Aprilis, Anno Dm 1626, Annoy. Aetat. 66. It is probable that the rapid demand for the Sylva Sylmrum wore out the plate ; for none of the later editions which I have seen contain any portrait at all ; and that which was prefixed to the Resus- citatio in 1657, though undoubtedly meant to be a fac-simile of Simon Pass's engraving, has been so much altered in the process of restoration, that I took it for a fresh copy until Mr. Holl showed me that it was only the old plate retouched. The lower part of the face has entirely lost its individuality and physiognomical character ; the outline of the right cheek has not been truly followed ; that of the nose has lost its shapeliness and delicacy ; and the first line an d- half of the inscription underneath has apparently been erased in order to give the name and titles in Latin. Nevertheless the adoption by Dr. Rawley of this print sufficiently authen- ticates it as a likeness at that time approved ; only the like- ness must of course be looked for in the plate as Sirnon Pass left it, not in restorations or copies. This Mr. Holl has endeavoured faithfully, and in my opinion very success- fully, to reproduce ; it being understood however that his aim has been to give as exact a resemblance as he could, not of the old engraving (the style of which has little to recommend it), but of the man whom the engraving repre- sents. I selected this likeness by preference, partly because ori- ginal impressions are scarce, and none of the others which I have seen give a tolerable idea of it; whereas the rival portrait by Van Somer is very fairly represented by the en- graving in Lodge's collection ; but chiefly because I have some reason to suspect that it was made from a painting by Cornelius OF THIS EDITION. xvii Janssen, and some hope that the original is still in existence and that this notice may lead to the discovery of it. Janssen is said to have come over to England in 1618, the year in which, as I have said, the engraving must have been published, Bacon did sit for his portrait to somebody (but it may no doubt have been to Van Somer) about that time ; at least 331, was " paid to the picture drawer for his Lp's picture," on the 12th of September, 161S. 1 Now I have in my possession an engraving in mezzotinto, purporting to be a portrait of Bacon, representing him in the same position and attitude, and the same dress (only that the figure on the vest is dif- ferent), and having a similar oval frame with the same kind of border. In the left-hand corner, where the painter's name is usually given, are the words Cornelius Johnson pinxit. The engraver's name is not stated ; but there is evidence on the face of the work that he was a poor per- former. In all points which require accuracy of eye and hand, and a feeling of the form to be described, it differs much from Pass's work, and is very inferior ; but in those which the most unskilful artist need never miss, such as the quantity of face shown, the disposition of the hair, and generally what may be called the composition of the pic- ture, there is no more difference between the two than may be well accounted for by the difficulty which is often found in ascertaining the true outlines of the obscure parts of a dark or damaged picture, or by the alterations which an engraver will often introduce when the size of his plate obliges him to cut off the lower part of the figure. The hat, for instance, which is dark against a dark background, sits differently on the head ; sits in fact (in the mezzotint) as it could not possibly have done in nature ; and the flap of the brim follows a somewhat different line, though the ir- regularity is of the same kind ; also the light and shadow are differently distributed over the folds of the frill ; the fur hangs differently ; the figure is cut off too short to admit the 1 See a book of accounts preserved in the State Paper Office. VOL. i. a xviii HISTORY AND PLAN hand ; and the ribbon round the neck, the lower part of which is concealed in Pass's print, is changed into a George and Garter. 1 But such varieties as these are of ordinary occurrence in copies of the same picture by different hands ; especially where one copier is attending chiefly to the out- lines of the forms without caring to represent the effect of the picture (the practice I think of engravers in Simon Pass's time), and the other is attending to the effect of the picture without caring, or without being able, to preserve the individual details, according to the practice of the popu- lar engravers of the eighteenth century ; whereas in two independent and original portraits of the same face the cor- respondencies which I have mentioned can hardly occur. But however that may be, this mezzotinto appears at least to prove that when it was made there was in existence a portrait which somebody believed to be a portrait of Bacon by Cornelius Johnson, that is (no doubt) Cornelius Janssen. When it was made becomes therefore an interesting ques- tion ; and I regret to say that it is a question which I have no data for determining, beyond the fact that it is in mezzotinto (an art of comparatively modern invention) ; that it was "sold by J. Cooper in James Street Covent Garden ;" and that there was an English engraver called Richard Cooper, who flourished about the year iy63, and among whose en- gravings a portrait of Francis Bacon Lord Keeper and Chancellor is mentioned as one. 2 With reference to this subject of portraits, I may add that the various engravings of Bacon are all (with one exception which I will mention presently) derived directly or through successive copies from one or other of two originals. One is Simon Pass's print; the features of which may be traced through many generations of copies, each less like than its predecessor; though always to be identified by the hat with irregular brim curving upwards towards the sides, and 1 If the original picture really has this badge, we may conclude, I suppose, that it was not a portrait of Bacon at all. And I should not be very much surprised if it turned out to be a Charles I. ' See Bryan's Painters and Engraters. OF THIS EDITION. XIX bound with a scarf. The other is a portrait by Van So- mer; the same I suppose that Aubrey saw at Gorharnbury in 1656; which has become the parent of two separate families ; one wearing 1 a hat with a brim describing a regu- lar curve doivnwards towards the sides, which sufficiently distinguishes it from Pass's portrait ; the other without any hat ; the composition being in other respects the same. Of both these the originals are at Gorhambury ; and they are both ascribed to Van Somer. But the latter is so very inferior to the former in every quality of art, that unless there be some evidence of the fact more to be relied on than an ordinary family tradition, I shall never be able to believe that it is by the same hand. It seems to me far more probable that at some later period when the fashion of painting people with the head covered had gone out, some one, wishing to have a portrait of Bacon without his hat, employed the nearest artist to make a copy of Van Somer's picture (Van Somer himself died in 1621, two or three years after it was painted, about the time when Bacon was in the Tower) with that alteration j and that this is the work he produced. That he was not a skilful artist is sufficiently apparent from the execution of those parts which were in- tended to be copies ; the peculiar character and expression of eyebrows, eyes, nose and mouth, being entirely missed ; and the whole handling being weak and poor, and without any sense of form. Moreover the hair is of a different texture ; and although we have neither any description nor any drawing of the upper part of Bacon's full-grown head, we know what it was like in his boyhood from two very ad- mirable representations, quite independent of each other and yet exactly agreeing ; and it is plain that such a head could never have grown into a shape at all like that which the painter has invented. However, they were both called portraits by Van Somer ; and the first (which is a very good work, as far as the painting goes) was engraved by Houbraken ; the last by Vertue. Unfortunately, these two artists, whose style of XX HISTORY AND PLAN execution made them very popular and gave them almost a monopoly of English historical portraiture in the 18th cen- tury, were both utterly without conscience in the matter of likeness. And though many of their works are brilliant specimens of effect in line-engraving, yet regarded as like- nesses of the men, they are all alike worse than worthless. The original from which Vertue's engraving of Bacon was taken, being itself destitute of all true physiognomical cha- racter, is indeed represented well enough. But if any one wishes to form a notion of Bacon's face as interpreted by Van Somer, he must consult the more modern engraving in Lodge's collection, which is at least a conscientious at- tempt to translate it faithfully; Houbraken's can only mis- lead him. The other engraving to which I have alluded as not derived from either of the originals above mentioned, is the small head engraved for Mr. Montagu's edition of Bacon's works. This was taken from a miniature by Hilliard then in the possession of John Adair Hawkins, Esq., representing Ba- con in his eighteenth year ; a work of exquisite beauty and delicacy. But here also, I regret to say, the laudable attempt to bring an image of it within reach of the general public has been attended with the same infelicity. The engraver has so completely failed to catch either expression, feature, character, or drawing, that I think no one can have once seen the original without wishing, in justice both to subject and artist, that no one who has not seen it may ever see the copy. Judging from the issue of Mr. Montagu's attempt to obtain an engraving of this miniature, it is perhaps fortunate that he did not fulfil the intention which he announced of giving an engraving of a bust in terra cotta representing Bacon in his twelfth year, which is at Gorhambury, in the possession of the Earl of Verulam. But this also is a work of great merit, and extremely interesting. It is coloured, and (like Hilliard's miniature) shows the head. I have been told by artists that it is probably of Italian workmanship j OF THIS EDITION. XXl and certainly the work of an accomplished sculptor, who had a delicate perception of form and character. A faithful re- presentation of it would be one of the most valuable con- tributions which could be made to our collections of the faces of memorable men. There are other portraits of Bacon in existence, but I have not myself seen any which can be relied upon as authentic or which appear to have any independent value. If the foregoing' remarks should be the means of bringing any such out of their hiding-places, I shall think them well bestowed ; and I need scarcely add that I should be most happy to receive any communication on the subject, and to afford what help I can towards putting them in their true light. JAMES SPEDDING. 60. Lincoln's Inn Fields, January, 1 85". VOL. I. ERRATA. for read V.l. I. p. 46. note 4 Erdman Erdmann. 72. note 1. naturale . natural!. 75. note 1. 74. - : . 73. 76. note 1. law of gravitation - those laws. 210. note 2. Aughiera - Anghiera. 218. note 1. line 11. vel . id. 242. note 2. a molluscous animal serpent medusae . . . ... is ... it de- are . . . they derive rives ... it . . . . them. 327. note 3. Pancosmias . Pancosmia. 338. line 1. Sic - Sit. 577. line 19. dele 3. 758. line 5. homino - homini. 771. note 5. XpOTV - (tporov. CONTENTS THE FIRST VOLUME, Page LIFE OF THE RIGHT HONOURABLE FRANCIS BACON, BARON OF VERULAM, BY WILLIAM RAWLEY, D.D. - 1 PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. GENERAL PREFACE to the PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS, by ROBERT LESLIE ELLIS - - - - - -21 PART I. WORKS PUBLISHED, OR DESIGNED FOR PUBLICATION, AS PARTS OF THE INSTAURATIO MAGNA. NOVUM ORGANUM. PREFACE TO THE NOVUM ORGANUM, by ROBERT LESLIE ELLLIS 71 INSTAURATIO MAGNA - 119 Prsefatio 125 Distributio Operis - 134 PARS SECUNDA OPERIS, QU^E DICITUR NOVUM ORGANUM - 149 Prsefatio - 151 Aphorism! de Interpretations Naturae et Rcgno Hominis 157 Liber Secundus Aphorismorum de Interpretatione Na- turae sive de Regno Hominis ... 227 xxiv CONTENTS OF THE FIRST VOLUME. taf PARASCEVE AD IIISTORIAM NATURALEM ET EXPERIMENTALEM. PREFACE - - 369 DESCRIPTIO HISTORIC NATDRALIS ET EXPERIMENTALIS QUALIS SUFFICIAT ET SIT IN ORDINE AD BASIN ET FUNDAMENTA PHILOSOPHISE VER^ - - - 393 APHORISMI DE CONFICIENDA HISTORIA PRTMA - - 395 CATALOGITS HISTORIARUM PARTICULARIUM, SECUNDUM CAPITA 405 DE AUGMENTIS SCIENTIARUM. PREFACE - - - 415 PARTITIONES SCIENTIARUM, ET ARGUMENTA SINGULORUJI CA- PITUM - - 425 DE DlGNITATE ET AUGMENTIS SCIENTIARUM Liber primus - - 431 secundus - 485 tortius - 539 quartus - - 579 quintus - 614 sextus - - 651 septimus - 713 octavus - - 745 nonus - - 829 Novus ORBIS SCIENTIARUM, SIVE DESIDERATA - 8.38 APPENDIX ON THE ART OF WRITING IN CIPHER - - 841 THE THE RIGHT HONOURABLE FRANCIS BACON, BARON OF VERULAM, VISCONNT ST. ALBAN. WILLIAM RAVLEY, D.D. HIS LORDSHIP'S FIRST AND LAST CHAPLAIN AND OF LATE HIS MAJESTIES CHAPLAIN IN ORDINARY. [This is the title of an edition printed in 1670, after Dr. Rawley's death, and pre- fixed to the ninth edition of the Sylva Sylvarum. The text of the Life itself is taken from the second edition of the Resuscitatio, the latest with which Rawley had anything to do. I have, however, modernised the spelling ; altered at discretion the typographical arrangement as to capitals, italics, and punctuation, which is very perplexing to a modern eye and has nothing to recommend it ; and added the notes. J. S 1 .] VOL. I. B THE LIFE THE HONOURABLE AUTHOR, 1 FRANCIS BACON, the glory of his age and nation, the adorner and ornament of learning, was born in York House, or York Place, in the Strand, on the two and twentieth day of January, in the year of our Lord 1560. His father was that famous counsellor to Queen Elizabeth, the second prop of the kingdom in his time, Sir Nicholas Bacon, knight, lord-keeper of the great seal of England ; a lord of known prudence, sufficiency, moderation, and integrity. His mother was Anne, one of the (laughters of Sir Anthony Cook ; unto whom the erudition of King Edward the Sixth had been committed ; a choice lady, and eminent for piety, virtue, and learning^; being exquisitely skilled, for a woman, in the Greek and Latin tongues. These being the parents, you may easily imagine what the issue was like to be ; having had whatsoever nature or breeding could put into him. His first and childish years were not without some mark of eminency ; at which time he was endued with that pregnancy and towardness of wit, as they were presages of that deep and universal apprehension which was manifest in him afterward ; and caused him to be taken notice of by several persons of worth and place, and especially by the queen ; who (as I have been informed) delighted much then to confer with him, and to 1 This Life was first, published in 1657, as an introduction to the volume enti- tled " Resuscitatio ; or bringing into public Ijpht several pieces of the works, civil, historical, philosophical, and theological, hitherto sleeping, of the Right Honour- able Francis Bacon, Baron of Verulam, Viscount St. Alban ; according to the best corrected copies." Of this volume a second edition, or rather a re-issue with fresh titlepage and dedication, and several sheets of new matter inserted, appeared in 1661 ; the "Life of the Honourable Author" being prefixed as before, and not altered otherwise than by the introduction of three new sentences ; to make room for which two leaves were cancelled. A third edition was brought out in 1671 by the original publisher, containing a good deal of new matter ; for which however Dr. Rawley, who died in 1667, is not answerable. B 2 4 DR. RAWLEY'S LIFE OF BACON. prove him with questions; unto whom he delivered himself with that gravity and maturity above his years, that Her Majesty would often term him, The young Lord-keeper. Being asked by the queen how old he teas, he answered with much discre- tion, being then but a boy, That he was two years younger than Her Majesty's happy reign ; with which answer the queen was much taken. 1 At the ordinary years of ripeness for the university, or rather something earlier, he was sent by his father to Trinity College, in Cambridge 2 , to be educated and bred under the tuition of Doctor John White-gift, then master of the college ; afterwards the renowned archbishop of Canterbury ; a prelate of the first magnitude for sanctity, learning, patience, and humility ; under whom he was observed to have been more than an ordinary proficient in the several arts and sciences. Whilst he was commorant in the university, about sixteen years of age, (as his lordship hath been pleased to impart unto myself), he first fell into the dislike of the philosophy of Aristotle; not for the worthlessness of the author, to whom he would ever ascribe all high attributes, but for the unfruitfulness of the way ; being a philosophy (as his lordship used to say) only strong for disputa- tions and contentions, but barren of the production of works for the benefit of the life of man ; in which mind he continued to his dying day. After he had passed the circle of the liberal arts, his father thought fit to frame and mould him for the arts of state ; and for that end sent him over into France with Sir Amyas Paulet then employed ambassador lieger into France 3 ; by whom he was after awhile held fit to be entrusted with some message or advertisement to the queen ; which having performed with great approbation, he returned back into France again, with intention to continue for some years there. In his absence in France his father the lord-keeper died 4 , having collected (as I 1 This last sentence was added hr^ne edition of 1661. The substance of it had appeared before in the Latin Life prefixed to the Opuscula Philosophica in 1658, which is only a free translation of this, with a few corrections. 2 He began to reside in April 1573 ; was absent from the latter end of August 1574 till the beginning of March, while the plague raged; and left the university finally at Christmas 1575, being then on the point of sixteen. See Whitgift's ac- counts, printed in the British Magazine, vol. xxxii. p. 365., an.d xxxiii. p. 444. 3 Sir Amyas landed at Calais on the 25th of September 1576, and succeeded Dr. Dale as ambassador in France in the following February. See Burghley's Diary, Murdin, pp. 778, 779. 4 In February DR. RAWLEY'S LIFE OF BACON. 5 have heard of knowing^ persons) a considerable sum of money, which he had separated, with intention to have made a compe- tent purchase of land for the livelihood of this his youngest son (who was only unprovided for ; and though he was the youngest in years, yet he was not the lowest in his father's affection) ; but the said purchase being unaccomplished at his father's death, there came no greater share to him than his single part and portion of the money dividable amongst five brethren; by which means he lived in some straits and necessities in his younger years. For as for that pleasant site and manor of Gor- humbury, he came not to it till many years after, by the death of his dearest brother, Mr. Anthony Bacon l , a gentleman equal to him in height of wit, though inferior to him in the endowments of learning and knowledge; unto whom he was most nearly conjoined in affection, they two being the sole male issue of a second venter. Being returned from travel, he applied himself to the study of the common law, which he took upon him to be his pro- fession 2 ; in which he obtained to great excellency, though he made that (as himself said) but as an accessary, and not his principal study. He wrote several tractates upon that sub- ject: wherein, though some great masters of the law did out-go him in bulk, and particularities of cases, yet in the science of the grounds and mysteries of the law he was exceeded by none. In this way he was after awhile sworn of the queen's council learned, extraordinary ; a grace (if I err not) scarce known be- fore. 3 He seated himself, for the commodity of his studies and 1 Anthony Bacon died in the spring of 1601. See a letter from Mr. John Cham- berlain to Sir Dudley Carlton, in the State Paper Office, dated 27th May 1601. 2 He had been admitted to Gray's Inn as "ancient" on the 21st of November 1576 ; commenced his regular career as a student in 1579 ; became " utter barrister " on the 27th of June 1582; bencher in 1586; reader in 1588; and double reader in 1600. See Harl. MSS. 1912. 9 In the Latin version of this memoir, for " after a while " Rawley substitutes nondum tyrocinium in lege egressus, by which he seems to assign a very early period as the date of this appointment. But I suspect he was mistaken, both as to the date and the nature of it. The title he got no doubt from a letter addressed by Bacon to King James, about the end of January 16201. "You found me of the Learned Council, Extraordinary, without patent or fee, a kind of individuum vagum. You established me and brought me into Ordinary." Coupling this probably with an early but undated letter to Burghley, in which Bacon thanks the queen for " ap- propriating him to her service," he imagined that the thanks were for the appoint- ment in question. This however is incredible. A copy of this letter in the Lands- downe Collection gives the date, 18 October 1580; at which time Bacon had not been even a student of law for more than a year and a half, and could not therefore have been qualified for such a place ; still less could such a distinction have been conferred upon him without being much talked of at the time and continually re- ferred to afterwards. Moreover, we have another letter of Bacon's to King James, B 3 6 DR. RAWLEYS LIFE OF BACON. practice, amongst the Honourable Society of Gray's-Inn, of which house he was a member ; where he erected that elegant pile or structure commonly known by the name of The Lord Bacon's Lodgings, which he inhabited by turns the most part of his life (some few years only excepted) unto his dying day. In which house he carried himself with such sweetness, comity, and generosity, that he was much revered and beloved by the readers and gentlemen of the house. Notwithstanding that he professed the law for his livelihood and subsistence, yet his heart and affection was more carried after the affairs and places of estate ; for which, if the majesty royal then had been pleased, he was most fit. In his younger years he studied the service and fortunes (as they call them) of that noble but unfortunate earl, the Earl of Essex ; unto whom he was, in a sort, a private and free counsellor, and gave him safe and honourable advice, till in the end the earl inclined too much to the violent and precipitate counsel of others his adherents and followers ; which was his fate and ruin. 1 His birth and other capacities qualified him above others of his profession to have ordinary accesses at court, and to come frequently into the queen's eye, who would often grace him with private and free communication, not only about matters of his profession or business in law, but also about the arduous affairs of estate ; from whom she received from time to time written in 1606, in which he speaks of his "nine years' service of the crown." This would give 1597 as the year in which he began to serve as one of the learned council ; at which time it was no extraordinary favour, seeing that he had been recommended for solicitor-general three or four years before, both by Burghley an 3 38 GENERAL PREFACE TO This omission is doubtless connected with the kind of realism which runs through Bacon's system, and which renders it practically useless. For that his method is impracticable cannot I think be denied, if we reflect not only that it never has produced any result, but also that the process by which scientific truths have been established cannot be so presented as even to appear to be in accordance with it. In all cases this process involves an element to which nothing corresponds in the tables of comparence and exclusion ; namely the application to the facts of observation of a principle of arrangement, an idea, existing in the mind of the discoverer antecedently to the act of induction. It may be said that this idea is precisely one of the naturae into which the facts of observation ought in Bacon's system to be analysed. And this is in one sense true ; but it must be added that this analysis, if it be thought right so to call it, is of the essence of the discovery which results from it. To take for granted that it has already been effected is simply a petitio principii. In most cases the mere act of induction follows as a matter of course as soon as the appropriate idea has been introduced. If, for instance, we resolve Kepler's disco- very that Mars moves in an ellipse into its constituent elements, we perceive that the whole difficulty is antecedent to the act of induction. It consists in bringing the idea of motion in an ellipse into connexion with the facts of observation ; that is, in showing that an ellipse may be drawn through all the observed places of the planet. The mere act of induction, the sTrayarytj, is perfectly obvious. If all the observed places lie on an ellipse of which the sun is the focus, then every position which the planet successively occupies does so too. This inference, which is so obvious that it must have passed through the mind of the discoverer almost unconsciously, is an instance of induction " per enumerationem simplicem;" of which kind of induction Bacon, as we have seen, has said that it is utterly vicious and incompetent. The word realism may perhaps require some explanation. I mean by it the opinion, which Bacon undoubtedly entertained, that for the purposes of investigation, the objects of our thoughts may be regarded as an assemblage of abstract conceptions, so that these conceptions not only correspond to realities, which is of course necessary in order to their having any value, but may also be said adequately to represent them. In his view of the THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 39 subject, ideas or conceptions (notiones) reside in some sort in the objects from which we derive them; and it is necessary, in order that the work of induction may be successfully accom- plished, that the process by which they are derived should be carefully and systematically performed. But he had not per- ceived that which now at least can scarcely be doubted of, that the progress of science continually requires the formation of new conceptions whereby new principles of arrangement are introduced among the results which had previously been ob- tained, and that from the necessary imperfection of human knowledge our conceptions never, so to speak, exhaust the essence of the realities by which they are suggested. The notion of an alphabet of the universe, of which Bacon has spoken more than once, must therefore be given up ; it could at best be only an alphabet of the present state of knowledge. And similarly of the analysis into abstract natures on which the process of exclusion, as we have seen, depends. No such analysis can be used in the manner which Bacon prescribes to us ; for every advance in knowledge presupposes the introduc- tion of a new conception, by which the previously existing analysis is rendered incomplete, and therefore erroneous. We have now, I think, succeeded in tracing the cause both of the peculiarities of Bacon's method, and of its practical inutility. Some additional information may be derived from an examination of the variations with which it is presented in different parts of his writings; less however than if we could arrange his smaller works in chronological order. Nevertheless two results, not without their value, may be thus obtained; the one, that it appears probable that Bacon came gradually to see more of the difficulties which beset the practical application of his method; and the other, that the doctrine of Forms is in reality an extraneous part of his philosophy. (10.) In the earliest work in which the new method of induc- tion is proposed, namely, the English tract entitled Valerius Terminus, no mention is made of the necessity of correcting commonly received notions of simple natures. The inductive method is therefore presented in its simplest form, unembar- rassed with that which constitutes its principal difficulty. But when we advance from Valerius Terminus to the Partis secundce Delineatio et Argumentum, which is clearly of a later date, we find that Bacon has become aware of the neces- D 4 40 GENERAL PREFACE TO sity of having some scientific method for the due construction of abstract conceptions. It is there said that the " pars infor- mans," that is, the description of the new method, will be divided into three parts the ministration to the senses, the ministration to the memory, and the ministration to the reason. In the first of these, three things are to be taught ; and of these three the first is how to construct and elicit from facts a duly formed abstract conception (bona notio); the second is how the senses may be assisted ; and the third, how to form a satis- factory collection of facts. He then proposes to go on to the other two ministrations. Thus the construction of conceptions would have formed the first part of the then designed Novum Organum ; and it would seem that this arrangement was not followed when the Novum Organum was actually written, because in the meantime Bacon had seen that this part of the work involved greater difficulties than he had at first supposed. For the general division into " ministrationes " is preserved in the Novum Organum 1 , though it has there become less prominent than in the tract of which we have been speaking. In the ministration to the senses, as it is mentioned in the later work, nothing is expressly included but a good and sufficient natural and experimental historia; the theory of the formation of conceptions has altogether disappeared, and both this ministration and that to the memory are post- poned to the last of the three, which contains the theory of the inductive process itself. We must set out, Bacon says, from the conclusion, and proceed in a retrograde order to the other parts of the subject. He now seems to have perceived that the theory of the formation of conceptions and that of the establishment of axioms are so intertwined together, that the one cannot be presented independently of the other, although in practice his method absolutely requires these two processes to be carried on separately. His view now is, that at first axioms must be established by means of the commonly received con- ceptions, and that subsequently these conceptions must them- selves be rectified by means of the ulterior aids to the mind, the fortiora auxilia in usum intellectus, of which he has spoken in the nineteenth aphorism of the second book. But these fortiora auxilia were never given, so that the difficulty which 1 Nov. Org. ii. 10. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 41 Bacon had once proposed to overcome at the outset of his undertaking remained to the last unconquered. The doctrine of the Novum Organum (that we must first employ commonly received notions, and afterwards correct them) is expressly laid down in the De Interpretation Naturae Sententice Duodecim. l Of this however the date is uncertain. It is clear that while any uncertainty remains as to the value of the conceptions (notiones) employed in the process of exclu- sion, the claim to absolute immunity from error which Bacon has made on behalf of his general method, must be more or less modified ; and of this he seems to have been aware when he wrote the second book of the Novum Organum.* (11.) Thus much of the theory of the formation of conceptions. With regard to the doctrine of Forms, it is in the first place to be observed that it is not mentioned as a part of Bacon's system, either in Valerius Terminus or in the Partis secundce Delineatio, or in the De Interpretatione Naturce Sententice Duodecim, although in the two last-named tracts the definition of science which is found at the outset of the second book of the Novum Organum is in substance repeated. This definition, as we have seen, makes the discovery of Forms the aim and end of science ; but in both cases the word form is replaced by causes. It is however to be admitted that in the Advancement of Learning, published in 1605, Forms are spoken of as one of the subjects of Meta- physique. Their not being mentioned except ex obliquo in Valerius Terminus is more remarkable, because Bacon has there given^a distinct name to the process which he afterwards called the discovery of the Form. He calls it the freeing of a direction, and remarks that it is not much other matter than that which in the received philosophies is termed the Form or formal cause. Forms are thus mentioned historically, but in the dogmatic statement of his own view they are not introduced at all. 3 The essential character of Bacon's philosophy, namely the analysis of the concrete into the abstract, is nowhere more pro- minent than in Valerius Terminus. It is there said "that every particular that worketh any effect is a thing compounded more or less of diverse single natures, more manifest and more obscure, and that it appeareth not to whether (which) of the 1 Vide viii. of this tract. 2 Nov. Org. ii. 19. 3 I refer to my preface to Valerius Terminui for an illustration of some of the diffi- culties of this very obscure tract. 42 GENERAL PREFACE TO natures the effect is to be ascribed." 1 Of course the great problem is to decide this question, and the method of solving it is called " the freeing of a direction." In explanation of this name, it is to be observed that in Valerius Terminus the prac- tical point of view predominates. Every instance in which a given nature is produced is regarded as a direction for its artificial production. If air and water are mingled together, as in snow, foam, &c., whiteness is the result. This then is a direction for the production of whiteness, since we have only to mingle air and water together in order to produce it. But whiteness may be produced in other ways, and the direction is therefore not free. We proceed gradually to free it by re- jecting, by means of other instances, the circumstances of this which are unessential : a process which is the exact counterpart of the Exclusiva of the Novum Organum. The instance I have given is Bacon's, who developes it at some length. Here then we have Bacon's method treated entirely from a practical point of view. This circumstance is worthy of notice because it serves to explain why Bacon always assumes that the knowledge of Forms would greatly increase our command over nature, that it " would enfranchise the power of man unto the greatest possibility of works and effects." It has been asked what reason Bacon had for this assumption. " Whosoever knoweth any Form," he has said in the Advancement, " knoweth the utmost possibility of superinducing that nature upon any variety of nature." Beyond question, the problem of super- inducing the nature is reduced to the problem of superinducing the Form ; but what reason have we for supposing that the one is more easy of solution than the other ? If we knew the Form of malleability, that is, the conditions which the intimate con- stitution of a body must fulfil in order that it may be malleable, does it follow that we could make glass so ? So far as these questions admit of an answer, Valerius Terminus appears to suggest it. Bacon connected the doctrine of Forms with practical operations, because this doctrine, so to speak, repre- sented to him his original notion of the freeing of a direction, which, as the phrase itself implies, had altogether a practical significance. Even in the Novum Organum the definition of the Form is 1 Val. Ter. c. 17. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 43 made to correspond with the praeceptum operand!, or practical direction. 1 The latter is to be "certum, liberum, et disponens sive in ordine ad actionem." Now a direction to produce the Form as a means of producing the given nature is certain, because the presence of the Form necessarily determines that of the nature. It is free, because it requires only that to be done which is necessary, since the nature can never be present unless its Form is so too. Thus far the agreement between the prac- tical and the scientific view is satisfactory. But to the third property which the practical direction is to possess, namely its being in ordine ad actionem, or such as to facilitate the production of the proposed result, corresponds the condition that the Form is to be " the limitation of a more general nature ; " that is to say, the Form presents itself as a limita- tion of something more general than the given nature, and as determining, not merely logically but also causatively, the existence of the latter. At this point the divergence between the practical and the scientific view becomes manifest ; practical operations do not, generally speaking, present to us anything analogous to the limitation here spoken of, and there is no reason to suppose that it is easier to see how this limitation is to be introduced than to see how the original problem, the e% ap-xfi? Trpoxetfjisvov, may be solved. But this divergence seems to show that the two views are in their origin heterogeneous ; that the one contains the fundamental idea of Bacon's method, while the other represents the historical element of his philo- sophy. We shall however hereafter have occasion to suggest considerations which may seem to modify this conclusion. (12.) In a survey of Bacon's method it is not necessary to say much of the doctrine of prerogative instances, though it occupies the greater part of the second book of the Novum Organum. It belongs to the unfinished part of that work ; at least it is probable that its practical utility would have been explained when Bacon came to speak of the Adminicula Inductionis. Twenty-seven kinds of instances are enumerated, which are said to excel ordinary instances either in their practical or their theoretical usefulness. To the word instance Bacon gives a wide range of signification. It corresponds more nearly to 1 Nov. Org. ii. 4., which is the best comment on the dictum, Knowledge is power. 44 GENERAL PREFACE TO observation than to any other which is used in modern scientific language. Of some classes of these instances collections are to be made for their own sake, and independently of any investigation into particular natures. Such, for instance, are the instantiae con- formes ; Bacon's examples of which are mostly taken from com- parative anatomy. One of them is the analogy between the fins of fishes, the feet of quadrupeds, and the feet and wings of birds ; another, the analogy of the beak of birds and the teeth of other animals, &C. 1 The other classes of prerogative instances have especial re- ference to particular investigation, and are to be collected when individual tables of comparence are formed. It would seem from this that the theory of prerogative in- stances is intended to guide us in the formation of these tables. But it is difficult to see how the circumstances which give any instance its prerogative could have been appreciated a priori. An instantia crucis 2 , to take the most celebrated of all, has its distinguishing character only in so far as it is viewed with re- ference to two contending hypotheses. In forming at the outset of an inquiry the appropriate tables, nothing would have led the interpreter to perceive its peculiar value. This theory, whatever may be its practical utility, may sup- ply us with new illustrations of the importance in Bacon's method of the process of exclusions. At the head of the list and placed there, we may presume, from the importance of the end which they promote stand the instantiae solitariaa, whose prerogative it is to accelerate the Exclusiva. 3 These are instances which exhibit the given nature in subjects which have nothing in common, except that nature itself, with the other subjects which present it to us. Thus the colours shown by the prism or by crystals are a solitary instance of colour, because they have nothing in common with the fixed colours of flowers, gems, &c. Whatever therefore is not in- dependent of the particular constitution of these bodies must be excluded from the form of colour. .Next to the instantiae solitariae are placed the instantiae migrantes, which show the given nature in the act of appearing 1 Nov. Org. ii. 27. It does not seem that Bacon added much to what he found in Aristotle on the subject of these analogies. * Nov. Org. ii. 36. * Nov. Org. ii. 22. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 45 or of disappearing ; as when glass, being pounded, becomes white. Of these it is said that they not only accelerate and strengthen the Exclusiva, but also confine within narrow limits the Affirm- ative, or Form itself, by showing that it is something which is given or taken away by the observed change. A little far- ther on Bacon notices the danger in these cases of confounding the efficient cause with the Form, and concludes by saying " But this is easily remedied by a legitimately performed Ex- clusiva." Other remarks to the same effect might be made with re- ference to other classes of instances; but these are probably sufficient. I shall now endeavour to give an account of Bacon's views on some questions of philosophy, which are not immediately connected with the reforms he proposed to introduce. (13.) It has sometimes, I believe, been supposed that Bacon had adopted the atomic theory of Democritus. This however is by no means true ; but certainly he often speaks much more favourably of the systems of the earlier physicists, and espe- cially of that of Democritus, than of the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. In doing this he may, perhaps, have been more or less influenced by a wish to find in antiquity something with which the doctrines he condemned might be contrasted. But setting this aside, it is certain that these systems were more akin to his own views than the doctrine of the schools of which Socrates may be called the founder. The problems which they proposed were essentially physical, given certain material first principles, to determine the origin and causes of all pheno- mena. They were concerned, for the most part, with that which is accessible to the senses, or Avhich would be so if the senses were sufficiently acute. In this they altogether agree with Bacon, who, though he often speaks of the errors and shortcomings of the senses, yet had never been led to consider the question which stands at the entrance of metaphysical phi- losophy, namely whether the subjective character of sensation does not necessarily lead to scepticism, if no higher grounds of truth can be discovered. The scepticism of Protagoras, and Plato's refutation of it, seemed to him to be both but idle sub- tleties. Plato, Aristotle, and their followers, were in his ophiion but a better kind of sophists. What Dionysius said to 46 GENERAL PREFACE TO Plato, that his discourse was but dotage, might fitly be applied to them all. 1 It cannot be denied, that to Bacon all sound philosophy seemed to be included in what we now call the natural sciences ; and with this view he was naturally led to prefer the atomic doctrine of Democritus to any metaphysical speculation. Every atomic theory is an attempt to explain some of the phenomena of matter by means of others ; to explain secondary qualities by means of the primary. And this was what Bacon himself pro- posed to do in investigating the Forms of simple natures. Nevertheless he did not adopt the peculiar opinions of De- mocritus and his followers. In the Novum Organum he rejects altogether the notion of a vacuum and that of the unchange- ableness of matter. 2 His theory of the intimate constitution of bodies does not, he remarks, relate to atoms properly so called, but only to the actually existing ultimate particles. Bacon cannot therefore be said to be a follower of Demo- critus, though he has spoken of him as being, of all the Greek philosophers, the one who had the deepest insight into nature. 3 But though Bacon was not an atomist, he was what has been called a mechanical physiologist. Leibnitz's remark that the restorers of philosophy 4 all held the principle that the properties of bodies are to be explained by means of magnitude, figure, and motion (a statement which envelopes every such theory of matter as that of Descartes, together with the old atomic doc- trine), is certainly true of Bacon. (14.) The opinion which Bacon had formed as to the class of subjects which ought to be included in Summary Philosophy (the English phrase by which he renders the expression he some- times uses, namely prima philosophia), is worthy of attention. In the writings of Aristotle, the first philosophy denotes the science which since his time has been called metaphysics. It is the science of first principles, or as he has himself defined it, the science of that which is, as such. In the first book of the Metaphysics we find a proof of the necessity of having such a science, distinct from and in a manner superior to all others. Bacon, adopting Aristotle's name, applied it differently. With 1 Redargut. Phil, et Nov. Org. i. 71. 2 Nov. Org. ii. 8. Compare Cogit. De Nat. Rerum. * Nov. Org. i. 51.; also Parm. Teles, and Dem. PhiL 4 Namely, the Cartesians, Verulam, Hobbes, &c. See his letter to Thomasiu=, p. 48. of the edition of his philosophical works by Erdman. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 47 him, the first philosophy is divided into two parts. Of these the first is to be a receptacle of the axioms which do not belong exclusively to particular sciences, but are common to more than one ; while the second is to inquire into the external or adventi- tious conditions of existences such as the much and the little, the like and the unlike, the possible and impossible, &c. In illustration of the contents of the first part, Bacon quotes several axioms which are applicable in more than one science. Of these the first is, " If to unequals are added equals, the sums are unequal," which is a mathematical principle, but which, Bacon says, referring to the distinction laid down by Aristotle between commutative and distributive justice, obtains also in moral science ; inasmuch as it is the rule by which distributive justice must be guided. The next is, " Things which agree with a third, agree with one another," which is also a mathe- matical principle, but yet, differently stated, forms the founda- tion of the theory of syllogism. Thus far Bacon's doctrine does not materially dissent from Aristotle's, who has taught the necessity of recognising in all sciences two kinds of principles, those which are proper to the subject of each science, and those which, connecting themselves with the doctrine of the catego- ries, are common to all. The last are in his nomenclature axioms, though Bacon, following probably Kamus, who in his turn followed Cicero and the Stoics, gives a much more general sense to this word ; and it is to be remarked that Aristotle has given as an instance of an axiom the first of the two which I have quoted from Bacon, or at any rate another which is in effect equivalent to it. But most of the instances which Bacon goes on to give are of a different nature. They are not derived from the laws of thought, but on the contrary involve an em- pirical element, and therefore are neither self evident, nor capable of an a priori proof. Thus the axiom that " a discord resolved into a concord improves the harmony," is, Bacon says, not only true in music, but also in ethics and the doctrine of the affections. But this axiom is in its literal sense merely a result of observation, and its application to moral subjects is clearly only analogical or tropical. Again, that " the organs of the senses are analogous to instruments which produce reflec- tion," is, Bacon says, true in perspective, and also in acoustics ; being true both of the eye and ear. Here we have a result of observation which is made to enter into two different sciences 48 GENERAL PREFACE TO simply in virtue of the classification employed. For this axiom, if true, properly belongs to physiology, and neither to perspec- tive nor to acoustics ; though in a secondary and derivative manner a portion of the truth it includes may be introduced into these sciences. And so on. There is however one of these axioms which is of higher authority : " Quantum naturae nee minuitur nee augetur :" which, Bacon says, is true not only in physics, but also in natural theology, if it be stated in a modified form; viz. if it be said that it belongs to Omnipo- tence to make something out of nothing, or vice versa. Of this axiom it may be remarked, that it is common to physics and natural theology simply because the subjects of these sciences are, in some measure, common to both; wherein it differs from the Aristotelian conception of an axiom. But it is of more interest to observe, that this axiom of which the truth is derived from our notion of substance, and which can never be established by an empirical demonstration, is constantly quoted by Bacon as a principle of incontestable truth ; of which his theory of specific gravities is in some sort only an application. The question arises both with regard to this axiom and to the others, In what manner Bacon supposed that they ought to be demonstrated ; or, if he thought they required no demonstra- tion, in what manner he conceived that the mind apprehended their truth ? He has certainly affirmed in express terms that there can be only two ways of arriving at truth, namely syllo- gism and induction ; both of which are manifestly inapplicable to some at least of the principles which he includes in the philosophia prima. But whether he would have admitted that this dictum admits of exception in relation to these cases, or on the other hand had not been led to consider the nature of the difficulty which they present, we have, I think, no means of deciding. It is to be observed that the philosophia prima is spoken of as a collection (receptaculum) of axioms a phrase which implies that it is not a science in itself, having its own principles and an independent development, but that, contrari- wise, it derives from the contributions of other sciences the elements of which it is composed. Of the second part we are unable to speak more definitely than of the first. It is obviously a reflexion of the Aristotelian doctrine of the categories ! , from 1 Trendelenberg has accordingly quoted the passages in the De Augmentis which relate to it, in the historical part of his work on the categories. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 49 which, however, Bacon intended to contrast it by requiring that the " conditiones entium," which he has doubtless called tran- scendent from their applicability to all classes of objects, should be treated not logically but physically. 1 But then what are the questions to be resolved in this mode of treating them ? Bacon gives some examples of the discus- sions which ought to occupy this part of philosophy. The first is, why there is so much of one kind of substance, and so little of another why, for instance, so much more iron in the world than gold, &c. This belongs to the inquiry " de multo et parvo." Again, in treating " de siniili et diverse," it ought to be explained why between dissimilar species are almost always interposed others which partake of the nature of both, and form, as it were, ambiguous species for instance, bats between birds and quadrupeds, or moss between corruption and plants, &c. The difficulty however which I have already mentioned in speaking of the other part of the philosophia prima recurs with reference to this, namely by what method were the questions here proposed to be answered ? If by induction, by induction on what data ? and if not, by what other way of arriving at truth ? The illustrations which Bacon has given, and perhaps his way of looking at the whole subject, connect themselves with what has recently been called palaezetiology. The questions which Bacon proposes are questions as to how that which actually exists, and which in the present order of things will continue to exist, came into being whether abruptly or by slow transitions, and under what agency. He seems to point, though from a distance, to discussions as to the formation of strata and the succession of species. Yet on the other hand the discussion on Like and Unlike was to include at least one portion of a different character, namely why, in despite of the maxim " similia similibus gaudent," iron does not attract iron but the magnet, nor gold gold, but quicksilver. (15.) Another subject, sufficiently interesting to be here mentioned, though less connected with Bacon's general views, is the doctrine which he entertained touching the nature of the soul. He distinguishes in several parts of his writings between the animal soul, common, at least in kind, to man and to the brutes, and the immortal principle infused by the divine favour 1 De Augmentis iii. 4. VOL. I. E 50 GENERAL PREFACE TO into man only. 1 To the latter he gave the name of spiraculum, which was of course suggested by the text, " Spiravit in faciem ejus spiraculum vite." M. Bouillet,, in his edition of Bacon's philosophical works 2 , condemns this doctrine of man's having two souls, and goes on to remark that Bacon was led to adopt it in deference to the opinions of the schoolmen, and that it is also sanctioned by S. Augustine. In these remarks he is much less accurate than usual ; the truth being that the doc- trine of the duality of the soul is condemned very strongly by S. Augustine and by the schoolmen, and that there is no doubt as to the source from which Bacon derived it, namely from the writings of Telesius. The notion of a lower soul, distinct in essence from the higher principle of man's nature, is in reality much older than Telesius. We find it for instance among the Manichees a circumstance which makes it singular that S. Augustine should have been supposed to countenance it. Both in his work DP. Ecclesics Dogmatibus, and nearly in the same words in that De Anima, he rejects in the most precise and accurate manner the doctrine of two distinct souls, affirming that there is but one, which is at once the principle of nutri- tion, of sensation, and of reason. In opposing the tenets of the Manichseans, he has more than once condemned the same doc- trine, though less at length than in the works just mentioned. The schoolmen also peremptorily rejected the doctrine which M. Bouillet has affirmed that Bacon derived from them. Thus S. Thomas Aquinas says, " Impossible est in uno homine esse plures animas per essentiam differentes, sed una tantum est anima intellectiva quae vegetative et sensitive et intellective officiis fungitur." 3 And this follows at once from the received opinion, that the soul is joined to the body as its form (ut forma unitur corpori). It would be easy to multiply citations to the same effect ; but as no schoolman could venture to con- tradict an emphatically expressed opinion of S. Augustine, it appears unnecessary to do so. 4 1 De Augmentis iv. 3. * CEuvres Philosophiques de Bacon. Paris, 1834. J. S. 3 S. Thorn. Prim. Q. 76. a. 3. Concl. 4 With what bold ignorance the schoolmen are sometimes spoken of is well seen in Dr. Gutwauer's preface to his edition of Leibnitz De Principio Individui. The sixth proposition in the Corolfarium attached to this disputation is as follows : " Hominis solum una est anima quae vegetativam et sensitivam virtualiter includat." The learned Doctor declares that in this statement Leibnitz set himself in direct op- position to the schoolmen, and that it contains the germ of Leibnitz's own psychology ; the statement being almost a literal transcript of that of St. Thomas Aquinas. Sum. i. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 51 Telesius of Cozensa, whom Bacon has commended as " the best of the novellists," was one of the Italian reformers of phi- losophy. Tennemann's remark that the reform which he at- tempted to introduce was but partial, as having reference only to the natural sciences, is not altogether accurate, but it describes with sufficient correctness the general character of his writings. They contain an attempt to explain all phenomena, including those of animal life, on the hypothesis of the continuous conflict and reciprocal action of two formal principles, heat and cold. His other doctrines are either subordinated to this kind of dualism, or are merely the necessary complements of a system of philosophy. In proposing to inquire into the nature and origin of the soul, he had no other end in view than to arrive at an explanation of the phenomena of sensation, voluntary motion, &c., which should be in accordance with his fundamental hypothesis. He therefore sets out from the phy- siological point of view ; and in order to explain the phenomena of animal and vegetable life, refers them to an indwelling spi- ritus, or animal soul, which in planta resides in the bark and fibres, and in animals in the white and exsanguine parts of the body, the bones being however excepted. l The animal and vegetable souls are in essence alike, but the latter is "paulo quam qui in animalibus inest crassior." In both cases the origin of this anima is the same ; it is educed from the seed (educta ex semine), and is to all intents as truly material as any other part of the body. In the application of these views to the soul of man, Telesius was met by considerations of another order. The soul educed ex semine, was (like the body which it animated, and of which it was only the subtlest portion) propagated by generation; whereas it was decided by orthodox theology that souls are not ex traduce, do not pass from parent to child in the way Telesius must have supposed. The soul is a gift, which after death is to return to Him who gave it. I do not conceive that Telesius's attempt to co-ordinate this doctrine with his own views arose merely from a wish to avoid the imputation of heresy. His writings are, I think, free from that tone of mocking deference to authority by which those of many of his contemporaries are Q. 76. a. 3., to which I have already referred. Leibnitz scarcely thought that in following the Angelic Doctor, he was protesting against scholasticism. 1 De Rerum Nat. v. 1. et vi. 26. E 2 52 GENERAL PREFACE TO disfigured. They have, on the contrary, much of the melan- choly earnestness which characterises those of his disciple Campanella. The difference between the faculties of men and brutes appeared to him to be such that merely a subtler organi- sation of the spiritus would be insufficient to account for it. Man's higher faculties are to be ascribed to a higher principle, and this can only be conceived of as a divinely formed soul. The question as to the relation between the two souls may be presented under two aspects, namely what are the faculties in man which ought to be ascribed to each of them ? and again are these two souls wholly independent, and if not, how are they connected? The criterion by which Telesius would de- cide what ought to be reserved as the peculiar appanage of the divinely created soul, appears to be this that which in man is analogous to the faculties we recognise in brutes ought to be ascribed to the principle by which they are animated and which we possess in common with them. Whatever, on the contrary, seems peculiar to man, more especially the sense of right and wrong, which is the foundation of all morality, ought to be ascribed to the principle which it is our prerogative to possess. l As to the connexion between the two, Telesius decides " both on grounds of human reason and from the authority of Scripture" that they cannot be wholly independent of each other, and he accordingly affirms that the divinely created soul is the Form of the whole body, and especially of the spiritus itself. That the soul is the Form of the body he could not without heresy deny 2 , although he condemns Aristotle for say- ing so ; asserting that Aristotle refers to the spiritus, and not to the true soul, with which probably he was unacquainted. 3 The tendency of these views is towards materialism ; the immaterial principle being annexed to the system, as it were, ab extra. Accordingly Telesius's disciple Donius, whom Bacon has more than once referred to, omits it altogether. 4 Comparing the views of Telesius with those of Bacon, we 1 De Rerum Natura, v. 2. * The collection known as the Clementines contains an authoritative decision on this point. "Ut quisque deinceps asserere defendere aut tenere pertinaciter praesump- serit, quod anima rationalis non sit forma corporis humani per se et essentialiter tanquam hsereticus sit censendus." I quote from Vulpes on Duns Scotus, Disp. 46. a. 5. To this decision Telesius seems to allude, De Ker. Nat. v. 40. Campanella has expressly mentioned it 8 De Rer. Nat. v. 3. * See his De Nat. Hominis. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 53 see that in both the duality of the soul is distinctly asserted, and that in both the animal soul is merely material. 1 Our know- ledge of the divinely derived principle must rest principally on revelation. Let this knowledge be drawn, he counsels us, from the same fountain of inspiration from whence the substance of the soul itself proceeded. Bacon rejects or at least omits Telesius's formula, that this higher soul is the Form of the body a formula to which either in his system or that of Telesius no definite sense could be attached. He differs from his predecessor in this also, that with him the spiritus is more a physiological and less a psychological hypothesis than with Telesius it is at least less enwrapped in a psychological system than we find it in the De Rerum Na- On the other hand, he has not, I think, recognised so dis- tinctly as Telesius or Campanella the principle that to the rational soul alone is to be referred the idea of moral responsibility ; and the fine passage on the contrast of public and private good in the seventh book of the De Augmentis seems to show (if Bacon meant that the analogy on which it is based should be accepted as anything more than an illustration) that he conceived that something akin to the distinction of right and wrong is to be traced in the workings, conscious or unconscious, of all nature. (16.) We are here led to mention another subject, on which again the views of Telesius appear to have influenced those of Bacon. That all bodies are animated, that a principle of life pervades the whole universe, and that each portion, beside its participation in the life of the world, has also its proper vital principle, are doctrines to which in the time of Bacon the ma- jority of philosophical reformers were at least strongly inclined. The most celebrated work in which they are set forth is perhaps the De Sensu Rerum of Campanella. The share which it had in producing the misfortunes of his life is well known, and need not here be noticed. In one of his letters to Thomasius 2 , Leibnitz points out how easy the transition is from the language which the schoolmen held touching substantial forms and the workings of nature to that of Campanella : " Ita reditur ad tot deunculos quot for- mas substantiales et Gentilem prope polytheismum. Et certe 1 Proceeding e matricibus elementorum, De Augm. iv. 3. 8 P. 48. of Erdmann's edition of his philosophical works. E 3 54 GENERAL PREFACE TO omnes qui de substantiis illis incorporalibus corporum loquun- tur non possunt mentem suam explicare nisi translatione a Men- tibus sumpta. Hinc enim attributus illis appetitus vel instinctus ille naturalis ex quo et sequitur cognitio naturalis, hinc illud axioma : Natura nihil facit frustra, omnis res fugit sui destruc- tionem, similia similibus gaudent, materia appetit formam nobi- liorem, et alia id genus. Quum tamen revera in natura nulla sit sapientia, nullus appetitus, ordo vero pulcher ex eo oriatur, quia est horologium Dei." To the censure implied in these remarks Aristotle is himself in some measure liable, seeing that he ascribed the various changes which go on around us to the half-conscious or unconscious workings of an indwelling power which pervades all tilings, and to which he gives the name of Nature. Nature does nothing in vain and of things possible realises the best, but she does not act with conscious prevision. She is, so to speak, the instinct of the universe. It is on account of these views that Bacon charges Aristotle with having set aside the doctrine of a providence, by putting Nature in the place of God. 1 Nevertheless Bacon himself thought it possible to explain large classes of phenomena by referring them, not certainly to the workings of Nature, but to the instincts and appetites of individual bodies. His whole doctrine of simple motions is full of expressions which it is very difficult to understand without supposing that Bacon had for the time adopted the notion of universally diffused sensation. Thus the " motus nexus " is that in virtue of which bodies, as delighting in mutual contact, will not suffer themselves to be separated. All bodies, we are told, abhor a solution of con- tinuity, and the rising of cream is to be explained by the desire of homogeneous elements for one another. The distinction which Bacon has elsewhere taken between sensation and perception, which corresponds to Leibnitz's dis- tinction between apperception and perception, does not appear to accord with these expressions. He there asserts that inani- mate bodies have perception without sensation. But such words as desire and horror imply not only a change worked in the body to which they are applied in virtue of the presence of another, but also a sense of that presence, that is, in Bacon's language, not only perception but sensation. * 1 De Aug. iii. 4. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 55 The contrast between the expressions I have quoted and those of which he made use in other parts of his writings, is remarkable. In stating the doctrine of simple motions, he speaks as if all phenomena were to be explained by means of the desires and instincts of matter, every portion of which is more or less consciously sentient. But in other passages we find what at first appears to be a wholly different view, namely that phenomena are to be explained by the site, form, and con- figuration of atoms or ultimate particles, capable neither of desire nor fear, and in all their motions simply fulfilling the primary law impressed on them by Providence. Nevertheless there is here no real inconsistency. For Bacon, following Telesius, ascribed all the phenomena of animal life to the spiritus, which, though it is the subtlest portion of the body .vhich it animates, is notwithstanding as truly material as any other part. In every body, whether animated or not, dwells a portion of spirit, and it was natural therefore to ascribe to it some share of the powers which the more finely constituted spirits of animals were supposed to possess. How far however this analogy between animate and inanimate bodies ought to be carried, was a doubtful question ; and we need not be surprised to find that Bacon sometimes denies and sometimes appears to admit that the latter as well as the former are, to a certain extent at least, consciously sentient. But in all cases he pro- posed to explain the phenomena of animal life by means of the ultimate constitution of matter. Thus such phenomena as the rising of cream, the subsidence of the lees of wine, the clinging of gold leaf round the finger, &c., were to be explained in the first instance by the instincts and appetites of portions of matter, and afterwards to receive a deeper and more fundamental expla- nation when these instincts and appetites were themselves shown to result from the site, form, and configuration of the ultimate particles of which all bodies are composed. To the doctrine of universally diffused sensation, so far as he adopted it, Bacon was led by the writings of many of his contemporaries, and in particular by those of Telesius. Brucker has remarked, and with perfect truth, that this doctrine is stated as distinctly, though not so conspicuously, by Telesius as by Campanella. Added to which this doctrine serves to explain phenomena of which, without it, no explanation could readily be given. Thus Bacon is much disposed to ridicule B 1 56 GENERAL PREFACE TO Gilbert for the pains he had bestowed on the subject of electrical attraction, affirming that it is merely the result of the power which friction possesses to excite the appetite of bodies for contact. This appetite " aerem non bene tolerat, sed aliud tangibile mavult." (17.) Bacon's opinion as to Final Causes has often been dis- cussed. It seems however scarcely necessary to refute the interpretation which on no just grounds has been given to the phrase, " causarum finalium inquisitio tanquam virgo Deo con- secrata nihil parit." l Nihil parit, as the context plainly shows, [means simply non parit opera]. 2 Bacon is speaking of the classification of physics and metaphysics the one being the science of the material and efficient cause, and the other con- taining two parts, namely the doctrine of forms and the doctrine of final causes. To physics corresponds in practical application mechanica or mechanics to metaphysics, magia or natural magic. But magia corresponds to metaphysique because the latter contains the doctrine of Forms ; that of final causes admit- ting from its nature of no practical application. It is this idea which Bacon has expressed by saying that the doctrine in ques- tion is, as it were, a consecrated virgin. It is not sufficiently remarked that final causes have often been spoken of without any reference to a benevolent intention. When it is said that the final cause of a stone's falling is "locus deorsum," the remark is at least but remotely connected with the doctrine of an intelligent providence. We are to remember that Bacon has expressly censured Aristotle for having made use of final causes without referring to the fountain from which they flow, namely the providence of the Creator. And in this censure he has found many to concur. Again, in any case in which the benevolent intention can be perceived, we are at liberty to ask by what means and according to what laws this benevolent intention is manifested and made efficient. If this question is not to be asked, there is in the first place an end of physical science, so far as relates to every case in which a benevolent intention has been or can be recognised ; and in the second, the argument a posteriori founded on the 1 De Augm. iii. 5. See note on the place J. S 1 2 I have supplied these words to complete the sentence, which ends abruptly at the bottom of a page, a fresh page having apparently been substituted for that which originally followed. J. S. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 57 contrivance displayed in the works of creation is entirely taken away. This is, in effect, what Bacon says in the passage of the De Augmentis in which he complains of the abuse of final causes. If, he affirms, the physical cause of any phenomenon can be assigned as well as the final, so far is this from derogating from our idea of the divine wisdom, that on the contrary it does but confirm and exalt it. "Dei sapientia effulget mirabilius cum natura aliud agit, providentia aliud elicit, quam si singulis sche- matibus et motibus naturalibus providentise characteres essent impressi." 1 And a little farther on he expresses an opinion which we shall do well always to remember, namely that so far is the study of physical causes from withdrawing men from God and providence, that on the contrary those who have occupied themselves in searching them out have never been able to find the end of the matter without having recourse at length to the doctrine of divine providence. In one respect Bacon seems to have overlooked the advan- tage which is to be derived from the study of final causes. In the sciences which relate to animal and vegetable life, the con- viction that every part of the organisation has its appropriate function which conduces to the well-being of the whole, serves not only to direct our thoughts to the wisdom of the Creator, but also to guide our investigation into the nature of the orga- nisation itself. (18.) It will now, I think, be well to attempt to arrange the fundamental ideas of Bacon's system in the order in which, as we may conceive, they presented themselves to his mind. To do this will necessarily involve some degree of repetition ; but it will enable us to form a better idea of the scope and spirit of his philosophy. When, at the outset of his philosophical life, he looked round on the visible, universe, it would seem that to him the starry heavens, notwithstanding the grandeur of the spectacle they present to us, were of less interest than things on earth. The stars in their courses declare the glory of God ; but, excepting the great lights which rule the day and night, they exert no conspicuous influence on the welfare of mankind. And on the 1 De Aug. iii. 4. 58 GENERAL PREFACE TO other hand it is certain that we can in nowise affect the causes by which these phenomena are produced. But on the earth beneath, and in the waters under the earth, Nature is perpe- tually working in ways which it is conceivable that we may be able to imitate, and in which the beneficence of the Creator, wherein His glory is to us chiefly visible, is everywhere to be traced. Wherever we turn, we see the same spectacle of un- ceasing and benevolent activity. From the seed of corn Nature developes the stalk, the blade, and the ear, and superinduces on the yet immature produce the qualities which make it fit for the sustenance of man. And so, too, animal life is developed from its first rudiments to all the perfection which it is capable of attaining. And though this perfection is necessarily tran- sitory, yet Nature, though she cannot perpetuate the individual, yet continues the species by unceasing reproduction. But the contemplation of God's works, glorious as they are, is not the whole of man's business here on earth. For in losing his first estate he lost the dominion over the creatures which was its highest privilege, and ever since has worn out few and evil days, exposed to want, sickness, and death. His works have all been vanity and vexation of spirit, his labour nearly profitless, his knowledge for the most part useless. Is his condition altogether hopeless, or may it not be possible to soften, though not to set aside, the effects of the primal curse? To this question Bacon unhesitatingly made answer, that of His great mercy God would bless our humble endeavours to restore to suffering humanity some part at least of what it had lost ; and thus he has more than once described the instauration of the sciences as an attempt to regain, so far as may be, that of which the Fall deprived us. A deep sense of the misery of mankind is visible throughout his writings. The principal speaker in the Redargutio Philo- sophiarum, and the son [father] of Solomon's House in the New Atlantis, both express Bacon's idea of what the philosopher ought to be ; and of both it is said that their countenance was as the countenance of one who pities men. Herein we see the reason why Bacon has often been called an utilitarian; not because he loved truth less than others, but because he loved men more. The philosopher is therefore not merely to contemplate the works of the Creator, but also to employ the knowledge thus THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 59 obtained for the relief of man's estate. If we ask how this is to be done, we find, Bacon tells us (and here he still seems to recur to the idea that the new philosophy is to be in some sort a re- storation to man of his original condition), that as no one can enter into the kingdom of heaven " nisi sub persona infantis," so, too, in order to obtain a real and fruitful insight into Nature, it is necessary to become as a little child, to abnegate received dogmas and the idols by which the mind is most easily beset* and then to follow with childlike singleness of purpose the indications which Nature gives us as to how her operations are performed. For we can command Nature only by obeying her ; nor can Art avail anything except as Nature's handmaiden. We can affect the conditions under which Nature works ; but things artificial as well as things natural are in reality pro- duced not by Art but Nature. Our power is merely based upon our knowledge of the procedure which Nature follows. She is never really thwarted or controlled by our operations, though she may be induced to depart from her usual course, and under new and artificial conditions to produce new phenomena and new substances. Natural philosophy, considered from this point of view, is therefore only an answer to the question, How does Nature work in the production of phenomena ? When, to take a trivial instance, she superinduces yellowness on the green leaf, or silently and gradually transforms ice into crystal, we ask how are these changes brought about? what conditions are neces- sary and sufficient in order that the phenomena we observe may be engendered? If we knew what these conditions are, we might ourselves be able to determine their existence, and then the corresponding phenomena would necessarily follow, since the course of Nature is absolutely uniform. At this point of the development of Bacon's system, the question of method would naturally present itself to him. Having determined what the object of our inquiries is to be, we must endeavour to find a way of attaining it. For this end Bacon, as we have seen, proposes to examine all the cases in which the phenomenon to be reproduced has been observed, and to note all the conditions which in each case accompany its production. Of all these those only can be ne- cessary which are universally concomitant. Again he proposes to observe all the cognate cases in which, though certain of the 60 GENERAL PREFACE TO conditions before mentioned are present, they are not accom- panied by the required phenomenon. By these two classes of observations all the superfluous conditions may be rejected, and those which remain are what we seek. Wherever we can determine their existence we can produce the phenomenon in question. This process is what Bacon calls, in Valerius Terminus, the freeing of a direction, and in his later writings the investigation of the Form. His thinking that this process would in all cases, oreven generally, be successful, arose from his not having sufficiently appreciated the infinite variety and complexity of Nature. Thus he strongly condemns as most false and pernicious the common opinion that the number of individual phenomena to be observed is sensibly infinite, and commends Democritus (a commendation which seems rather to belong to Lucretius) for having perceived that the appearance of limitless variety which the first aspect of Nature presents to us disappears on a closer inspection. The transition from this view of Nature to the idea that it was possible to form an alphabet of the universe, and to analyse all phenomena into their real elements, is manifestly easy. By the new method of induction it would be possible to ascertain the conditions requisite and sufficient for the produc- tion of any phenomenon ; and as this determination was meant chiefly to enable us to imitate Nature, or rather to direct her operations, Bacon was naturally led to assume that the con- ditions in question would be such that it would in all cases be possible to produce them artificially. Now the power of man is limited to the relations of space. He brings bodies together, he separates them ; but Nature must do the rest. On the other hand the conditions of the existence of any phenomenon must be something which inheres more closely in the essence of the substance by which that phenomenon is exhibited than the phenomenon itself. And this something is clearly the inward configuration of the substance ; that is, the form and arrangement &c. of its ultimate particles. Whiteness, for instance, depends on an even arrangement of these particles in space ; and herein we perceive a perfect analogy between what man can do and what Nature requires to be done. The familiar processes of the arts consist simply in giving particular forms to portions of matter, in arranging them and setting them in motion according THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 61 to certain rules. Between arranging stones so as to form a house, and arranging particles so as to produce whiteness, there is no difference but that of scale. So in other cases. The difference of scale once set aside, it seemed to follow that the knowledge of the Form would in all cases lead to great practical results. Thus far of the end which the new philosophy proposes to itself, and of the method which it must employ. The next question relates to the mode of procuring and arranging the materials on which this method is to work. In this part of the subject we again perceive the influence of Bacon's opinion touching the limitedness of Nature. No one acquainted with the history of natural philosophy would think it possible to form a collection of all the facts which are to be the materials on which any science is to operate, antecedently to the formation of the science itself. In the first place, the observations necessary in order to the recognition of these facts would never have been made except under the guidance of some preconceived idea as to the subject of observation ; and in the second, the statement which embodies the result of observation always involves some portion of theory. According to the common use of language, it is a fact and not a theory that in ordinary refraction the sine of the angle of in- cidence is to the sine of the angle of refraction in a given ratio. But the observations on which this statement is based, and the statement itself, presuppose the recognition of a portion of the theory of light, namely that light is propagated in straight lines in other words, they presuppose the conception of a ray. Nor would these observations have been made but for the idea in the mind of the observers that the magnitude of the angle of refrac- tion depends on that of the angle of incidence. As we advance farther in any science, what we call facts in- volve more and more of theory. Thus it is a fact that the tangent of the angle of polarisation is equal to the index of re- fraction. But no one could have made the observations which prove it, or have stated their result in words, without a distinct conception, first of the law of refraction, and secondly of the distinguishing character of polarised light. The history of science and the nature of the case concur in showing that observation and theory must go on together ; it is impossible that the one can be completed before the other 62 GENERAL PREFACE TO begins. Now although Bacon did not think that observation and experiments might altogether be laid aside when once the process of interpretation had begun (we see on the contrary that one of the works of Solomon's House was the trying of experiments suggested by previously obtained conclusions), he certainly thought it possible so to sever observation from theory that the process of collecting facts and that of deriving conse- quences from them might be carried on independently and by different persons. This opinion was based on an imperfect ap- prehension of the connexion between facts and theories; the connexion appearing to him to be merely an external one, namely that the former are the materials of the latter. With these views that which has been already noticed touching the finiteness of Nature, namely that there are but a finite and not very large number of things which for scientific purposes require to be observed *, is altogether in accordance. The facts on which the new philosophy was to be based, being conceivable apart from any portion of theory, and more- over not excessively numerous, they might be observed and recorded within a moderate length of time by persons of ordinary diligence. If this registering of facts were made a royal work, it might, Bacon seems to have thought, be completed in a few years : he has at least remarked that unless this were done, the foundation of the new philosophy could not be laid in the lifetime of a single generation. The instauration, he has said in the general preface, is not to be thought of as something infinite and beyond the power of man to accomplish ; nor does he believe that its mission can be fully completed (rem omnino perfici posse) within the limits of a single life. Something was therefore left for posterity to do ; and probably the more Bacon meditated on the work he had in hand, the more was he convinced of its extent and difficulty. But the Distributio Operis sufficiently shows that he believed, when he wrote it, that the instauration of the sciences might speedily become an opus operatum. Of the Historic, Naturalis on which it was to be based he there speaks, not less than of the Novum Organum, as of a work which he had himself accomplished, " Tertia pars operis complectitur Phaenomena Universi," not " complecti debet." Doubtless 1 See the Phaenomena Universi, and toe Partis secundje Del., &c. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 63 the preface was written before the work itself was commenced ; still if he had not thought it possible to make good what he here proposes to do, he would have expressly said so. l In a letter to Fulgenzio, written probably when Bacon was "dagli anni e da fortuna oppresso," he remarks that "these things " (the instauration of the sciences) require some ages for the ripening of them. But though he despaired of completing his design himself, and even thought that some generations must pass before it received its consummation, yet he always regarded it as a thing which sooner or later would be effectually accomplished, and which would thenceforth remain as a /m/^a ss dsl. His instauration of the sciences had a definite end, in which when it was once attained it would finally acquiesce; nor is there anything in his writings to countenance the assump- tion which has been often made, that in his opinion the onward progress of knowledge was to continue throughout all time. On the contrary, the knowledge which man is capable of might, he thought, be attained, not certainly at once, but within the compass of no very long period. In this doubtless he erred ; for knowledge must always continue to be imperfect, and therefore in its best estate progressive. Bacon has been likened to the prophet who from Mount Pisgah surveyed the Promised Land, but left it for others to take possession of. Of this happy image perhaps part of the felicity was not perceived by its author. For though Pisgah was a place of large prospect, yet still the Promised Land was a land of definite extent and known boundaries, and moreover it was certain that after no long time the chosen people would be in possession of it all. And this agrees with what Bacon promised to himself and to mankind from the instauration of the sciences. A truer image of the progress of knowledge may be derived from the symbol which, though on other grounds, Bacon him- self adopted. Those who strive to increase our knowledge of the outward universe may be said to put out upon an apparently boundless sea : they dedicate themselves " To unpathed waters undreamed shores ; " and though they have a good hope of success, yet they know 1 The sixth part, containing the new philosophy itself, is spoken of at the end of the Distributio as at least an inchoate work, which others must finish, but to which he hopes to give " initia non contemnenda." 64 GENERAL PREFACE TO they can subdue but a small part of the new world which lies before them. (19.) In this respect then, as in others, the hopes of Francis Bacon were not destined to be fulfilled. It is neither to the technical part of his method nor to the details of his view of the nature and progress of science that his great fame is justly owing. His merits are of another kind. They belong to" the spirit rather than to the positive precepts of his philosophy. He did good service when he declared with all the weight of his authority and of his eloquence that the true end of know- ledge is the glory of the Creator and the relief of man's estate. The spirit of this declaration runs throughout his writings, and we trust has worked for good upon the generations by which they have been studied. And as he showed his wisdom in coupling together things divine and human, so has he shown it also in tracing the demarcation between them, and in rebuking those who by confounding religion and philosophy were in danger of making the one heretical and the other superstitious. When, not long before Bacon's time, philosophy freed itself from the tutelage of dogmatic theology, it became a grave ques- tion how their respective claims to authority might be most fitly co-ordinated. It was to meet, perhaps rather to evade, this question, that the distinction between that which is true in philosophy and that which is true in religion was proposed and adopted. But it is difficult to believe that the mind of any sincere and truth-loving man was satisfied by this distinction. Bacon has emphatically condemned it, " There is," he affirms, " no such opposition between God's word and his works." Both come from Hun who is the father of lights, the fountain of all truth, the author of all good ; and both are therefore to be studied with diligence and humility. To those who wish to discourage philosophy in order that ignorance of second causes may lead men to refer all things to the immediate agency of the first, Bacon puts Job's question, " An oportet mentiri pro Deo," will you offer to the God of truth the unclean sacrifice of a lie ? The religious earnestness of Bacon's writings becomes more remarkable when we contrast it with the tone of the most il- lustrious of his contemporaries. Galileo's works are full of in- sincere deference to authority and of an affected disbelief in his own discoveries. Surely he who loves truth earnestly will be THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 65 slow to believe that the cause of truth i8 to be served by irony. But we must not forget the difference between the circum- stances in which the two men were placed. Next to his determination of the true end of natural philo- sophy and of the relation in which it stands to natural and to revealed theology, we may place among Bacon's merits his clear view of the essential unity of science. He often insists on the importance of this idea, and has especially commended Plato and Parmenides for affirming " that all things do by scale ascend to unity." The Creator is holy in the multitude of his works, holy in their disposition, holy in their unity : it is the prerogative of the doctrine of Forms to approach as nearly as possible towards the unity of Nature, and the subordinate science of Physics ought to contain two divisions relating to the same subject. One of these ought to treat of the first principles which govern all phenomena, and the other of the fabric of the universe. 1 All classifications of the sciences ought to be as veins or markings, and not as sections or divisions ; nor can any object of scientific inquiry be satisfactorily studied apart from the analogies which connect it with other similar objects. But the greatest of all the services which Bacon rendered to natural philosophy was, that he perpetually enforced the ne- cessity of laying aside all preconceived opinions and learning to be a follower of Nature. These counsels could not to their full extent be followed, nor has he himself attempted to do so. But they contain a great share of truth, and of truth never more needful than in Bacon's age. Before his time doubtless the authority of Aristotle, or rather that of the scholastic interpreta- tion of his philosophy, was shaken, if not overthrown. Never- theless the'systematising spirit of the schoolmen still survived, and of the reformers of philosophy not a few attempted to sub- stitute a dogmatic system of their own for that from which they dissented. Nor were these attempts unsuccessful. For men still leaned upon authority, and accepted as a test of truth the appearance of completeness and scientific consistency. This state of things was one of transition ; and probably no one did more towards putting an end to it than Bacon. To the dealers in systems and to their adherents he opposed the solemn declaration, that 1 The latter is in effect what is now called Kosmos. VOL. I. F 66 GENERAL PREFACE TO they only who come in their own name will be received of men. He constantly exhorted the seeker after truth to seek it in intercourse with Nature, and has repeatedly professed that he was no founder of a sect or school. He condemned the arro- gance of those who thought it beneath the dignity of the philo- sopher to dwell on matters of observation and experiment, and reminded them that the sun " seque palatia et cloacas ingreditur ; nee tamen polluitur." We do not, he continues, erect or de- dicate to human pride a capitol or a pyramid ; we lay the foundations in the mind of man of a holy temple, whereof the exemplar is the universe. Throughout his writings the re- jection of systems and authority is coupled with the assertion, that it is beyond all things necessary that the philosopher should be an humble follower of Nature. One of the most remarkable parts of the Novum Organum is the doctrine of Idola. It is an attempt to classify according to their origin the false and ill- defined notions by which the mind is commonly beset. They come, he tells us, from the nature of the human mind in general, from the peculiarities of each man's individual mind, from his intercourse with other men, from the formal teaching of the re- ceived philosophies. All these must be renounced and put away, else no man can enter into the kingdom which is to be founded on the knowledge of Nature. 1 Of the four kinds of idols Mersenne has spoken in his V'erite des Sciences, published in 1625, as of the four buttresses of the Organum of Verulam. This expression, though certainly inaccurate, serves to show the attention which in Bacon's time was paid to his doctrine of idola, 2 His rejection of syllogistic reasoning in the proposed process for the establishment of axioms, was not without utility. In the middle ages and at the reform of philosophy the value of the syllogistic method was unduly exalted. Bacon was right in denying that it was possible to establish by a summary process and a priori the first principles of any science, and thence to deduce by syllogism all the propositions which that science could contain; and though he erred in rejecting deductive reasoning altogether, this error could never have exerted any practical influence on the progress of science, while the truth 1 Nov. Org. i. 68. The word idolon is used by Bacon in antithesis to idea. He does not mean by it an idol or false object of worship. 2 Compare Gassendi, Inst. Log. THE PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. 67 with which it was associated was a truth of which his contem- poraries required at least to be reminded. The reason of his error seems to have been that he formed an incorrect idea of the nature of syllogism, regarding it rather as an entirely arti- ficial process than as merely a formal statement of the steps necessarily involved in every act of reasoning. However this may be, it is certain that whenever men attempted to set aside every process for the discovery of truth except induction, they must always have been led to recognise the impossibility of doing so. Lastly, the tone in which Bacon spoke of the future destiny of mankind fitted him to be a leader of the age in which he lived. It was an age of change and of hope. Men went forth to seek in new-found worlds for the land of gold and for the fountain of youth; they were told that yet greater wonders lay within their reach. They had burst the bands of old authority ; they were told to go forth from the cave where they had dwelt so long, and look on the light of heaven. It was also for the most part an age of faith ; and the new philosophy upset no creed, and pulled down no altar. It. did not put the notion of human perfectibility in the place of religion, nor deprive mankind of hopes beyond the grave. On the contrary, it told its followers that the instauration of the sciences was the free gift of the God in whom their fathers had trusted that it was only another proof of the mercy of Him whose mercy is over all his works. F 2 PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS. PART I. WORKS PUBLISHED, O& DESIGNED FOR PUBLICATION, AS PARTS OF THE INSTAURATIO MAGNA ; ARRANGED ACCORDING TO THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY WERE WRITTEN. Consilium est universum opus Instaurationis potius promovore in multis quam perficere in panels ; hoc perpetuo maximo cum ardore (qualemDeus mentibus ut plane confidimus addere sold) appetentes ; ut quod adhuc nunquara tentatum sit Id ne jam frustra tentetur. Auctoris Monitum, 1622. T 3 NOVUM ORGANUM. NOTE. Mr. Ellis's preface to the Novum Organum was written when he was travelling abroad and had not his books of refer- ence about him. He was at work upon it the night he was taken ill at Mentone, a d was not afterwards able either to finish or to revise it. I have added a page or two at the end, by which the analysis of the first book is completed. Of the se- cond book it was not necessary to say anything ; the subject of it being Bacon's method, which has been fully discussed in the Ge- neral Preface. A few bibliographical inaccuracies of little con- sequence in themselves I have corrected, either in notes or by the insertion of words within brackets. These were merely over- sights, hardly avoidable in the first draft of a work written in such circumstances. But there are also a few opinions expressed incidentally in which I cannot altogether concur, though they have evidently been adopted deliberately. With regard to these (Mr. Ellis not being in a condition to enter into a discussion of them) I had no course but to explain the grounds of my dissent, and leave every man to decide for himself upon the questions at issue. To avoid inconvenient interruptions however, I have thrown my arguments into an appendix, and contented myself in the foot notes with marking the particular expressions which I hold to be questionable. J. S. 71 BY EGBERT LESLIE ELLIS. THE Novum Organum was published in 1620. Certain pro- legomena to the whole of the Instauratio were prefixed to it, namely a Procemium beginning " Franciscus de Verulamio sic cogitavit," a dedication to King James, a general preface, and an account, entitled Distributio Operis, of the parts of which the Instauratio was to consist. Of these the Novum Organum is the second ; the De Augmentis, which was not then published, occupying the place of the first. Accordingly in most editions of Bacon's works the prolegomena are prefixed, not to the Novum Organum, but to the De Augmentis ; and this is doubt- less their natural place. Nevertheless as Bacon's general design was not completed, it seems better to allow them to remain in their original position, especially as in the Prooemium Bacon explains why he publishes one portion of the Instauratio apart from the rest. " Decrevit," he there says, speaking of himself, " prima quaeque quae perficere licuit in publicum edere. Neque haec festinatio ambitiosa fuit, sed sollicita, ut si quid illi huma- nitus accideret, exstaret tamen designatio quaedam ac destinatio rei quam animo complexus est," &c. After the Proosmium and the dedication we come to the Pras- fatio Generalis, in which Bacon speaks of the unprosperous state of knowledge and of the necessity of a new method ; and then follows the Distributio Operis. The Instauratio is to be divided into six portions, of which the first is to contain a general survey of the present state of knowledge. In the second men are to be taught how to use their understanding aright in the investigation of Nature. In the third all the phenomena of the universe are to be stored up as in a treasure-house, as the mate- rials on which the new method is to be employed. In the fourth examples are to be given of its operation and of the results to 72 PREFACE TO which it leads. The fifth is to contain what Bacon had accom- plished in natural philosophy without the aid of his own method, but merely " ex eodem intellectus usu quern alii in inquirendo et inveniendo adhibere consueverunt." It is therefore less important than the rest, and Bacon declares that he will not bind himself to the conclusions it contains. Moreover its value will alto- o-ether cease when the sixth part can be completed, wherein will be set forth the new philosophy the result of the application of the new method to all the phenomena of the universe. But to complete this, the last part of the Instauratio, Bacon does not hope : he speaks of it as a thing " et supra vires et ultra spes nostras collocata." The greater part of the plan traced in the Distributio remained unfulfilled. Not to speak of the last division of the Instauratio, no part of Bacon's writings can properly be referred either to the fourth or fifth, except two prefaces which are found among the fragments published by Gruter. l To the fifth division however M. Bouillet 2 is disposed to refer several of Bacon's philosophical writings ; as, for instance, the tracts entitled De Fluxu et Refluxu Marts, and Thema Cceli. But though they correspond with the description which Bacon gives of the con- tents of the fifth part of the Instauratio, there is no reason to suppose that they would have been comprised in it. They were written a considerable time before the publication of the Novum Organum ; the Thema Cceli being clearly of the same date as the Descriptio Globi intellectualis, written in 1612 3 , and the De Fluxu et Refluxu Maris being probably written before Bacon had become acquainted with Galileo's theory of the tides. This theory was published in 1616; and it is reasonable to suppose that Bacon, who speaks of it in the Novum Organum, would have mentioned it in the De Fluxu, if the latter had not been written either before it was published, or but a short time after- wards. 4 These tracts, and the others which M. Bouillet men- 1 Francisci Baconi de Verulamio Scripta in naturale et universal! Philosophia. Amst. 1G53. For a particular account of this volume, see my preface to Part III. J. S. 2 (Euvres Philosophiques de Bacon, publiees d'apres les textes originaux, avec notice, sommaires et eclaireissemens, par M. N. Bouillet. Paris, 1834. J. S. 3 See the Preface to the Descriptio Globi intellectual! a. J. S. 4 That the De Fluxu was written before the Thema Cceli is almost proved by the allusion to it in the following passage : " Verum hujusce rei demonstrations et evidentias in anticipatione nostra de fluxu et refluxu maris plene tractavimus." I say almost proved, because Bacon in writing a piece which was designed to come after another which was not yet written, would sometimes refer to that other as if it were already done. But it is not likely that he thould have done so here; for in any THE NOVUM ORGANUM. 73 tions, are clearly occasional writings not belonging to the circuit of the Instauratio. To the fourth part have been referred the Historia Ventorum, the Historia Vita et Mortis, &c. This however is contrary to Bacon's description of them in the dedication to Prince Charles prefixed to the Historia Ventorum. They are there spoken of as the " primitive Historic nostrce naturalis." Even the general title with which the Historia Ventorum and the titles of five other Historite were published, shows that they belong not to the fourth but to the third part of the Instauratio. It is as follows : Historia Naturalis ad condendam Philosophiam, sive Ph&nomena Universi, qua est Instaurationis Magnoe pars tertia. It is moreover manifest that as the fourth part was to contain applications to certain subjects of Bacon's method of induction, these treatises, in which the method is nowhere employed, can- not belong to it. M. Bouillet, though he justly dissents from Shaw's ' arrangement, by whom they are referred to the fourth part, nevertheless commits an error of the same kind by intro- ducing into this division of the Instauratio a fragment on Motion, published by Gruter with the title Filum Labyrinthi, sive Inquisitio legitima de Motu. This fragment, which is doubt- less anterior to the Novum Organum, contains many thoughts and expressions which are found more perfectly developed either in the Novum Organum itself, or in the Distributio Operis. It is not to be supposed that Bacon, after thus expressing himself in the Distributio "Neque enim hoc siverit Deus ut phantasiae nos- trse somnium pro exemplari mundi edamus ; sed potius benigne faveat ut apocalypsim ac veram visionem vestigiorum et sigillo- rum Creatoris super creaturas scribamus " would have repeated this remarkable sentence with scarcely any alteration in another part of the Instauratio 2 ; nor that he would have repeated in general scheme .the Thema Cceli would have come before the De Fluxu. In a letter to Bacon, dated 14th April 1619, Tobie Matthew speaks of Galileo's having answered Bacon's discourse touching the flux and reflux of the sea : but he alludes apparently to a discourse of Galileo's on that subject which had never been printed. J. S. 1 The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, Baron of Verulam, &c. ; methodised and made English from the Originals, by Peter Shaw, M.D. London, 1733. J. S. * I doubt whether this argument can be safely relied upon. Among the works which were certainly meant to stand as part of the Instauratio several remarkable passages occur twice and more than twice. But there are other grounds for con- cluding that the Inquisitio de Motu was written soon after the Cogitata et Visa (1607). In the Commentarivs solutus, a kind of diary which will be printed among the Occa- sional Works, I find the following entry under the date July 26. 1608: " The finish- ing the 3 tables De Motu, De Galore et Frigore, De Sono." After which follow 74 PREFACE TO a somewhat less finished form the whole substance of the hun- dred and twenty-fifth aphorism of the first book of the Novum Organum. Yet we must admit this improbable supposition, if we decide on giving to the Inquisitio legitima the place which M. Bouillet has assigned to it. The truth is, that many of Bacon's shorter tracts preserved by Gruter and others are merely, so to speak, experimental fragments, of which the sub- stance is embodied in his more finished writings. Of the fourth and fifth parts of the Instauratio nothing, as I have already remarked, has been preserved except the prefaces, if indeed any other portion of them ever existed. But of the third, though it is altogether incomplete, we have nevertheless large fragments. Two years after the publication of the Novum Organum Bacon published the Historia Naturalis ad con- dendam Philosophiam, which has been already mentioned. In this however only the Historia Ventorum is contained in ex- tenso ; and of the five other Historiae of which Bacon speaks in the dedication, and of which he proposed to publish one every month, only two are now in existence, namely the Historia Vit